subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | boy-griv | j6llh87 | <|sols|><|sot|>I think we should transition to Rust and aim to have it done by the next major release: ... Being written in Rust will help fish continue to be perceived as modern and relevant<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512<|eol|><|sor|>Here's the bigger jerk
>> Essentially, distros like Debian will just ship an older version of your program, just like they do for almost everything else.
>To me, this is why distros like Debian are slowly moving into irrelevance. Nix/NixOS seems a much better approach.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=debian,fedora%20linux,linux%20mint,arch%20linux,kali%20linux
Must be hella slow<|eor|><|sor|>wow, really? google trends? do you really think its insightful that a billion of the most mid humans on the planet are searching for the most mid distro on the planet? be honest.
seriously, what self respecting dev even uses google any more? I havent even heard anyone around me mention google in at least a decade.
If you want to really know what the future of tech holds for linux, look at trends.ycombinator.com or trends.lists.gnu.org and *at a minimum* filter it down to people using brave, iridium, or qute.<|eor|><|sor|>Who uses Google? Well, people with full time jobs, for starters...<|eor|><|sor|>No one on pcj then<|eor|><|sor|>why would we have jobs? most of us cashed out and retired before we were 28 or 30.<|eor|><|sor|>well, I was checked out and tired before 30 if thats what you mean<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | dangerbird2 | j6lji44 | <|sols|><|sot|>I think we should transition to Rust and aim to have it done by the next major release: ... Being written in Rust will help fish continue to be perceived as modern and relevant<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512<|eol|><|sor|>Here's the bigger jerk
>> Essentially, distros like Debian will just ship an older version of your program, just like they do for almost everything else.
>To me, this is why distros like Debian are slowly moving into irrelevance. Nix/NixOS seems a much better approach.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=debian,fedora%20linux,linux%20mint,arch%20linux,kali%20linux
Must be hella slow<|eor|><|sor|>Its almost Debian is slow to upgrade package versions because like 90% of servers worldwide use some variant of Debian, and Debian releasing unstable software would literally break the internet<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | warmwaffles | j6lvh21 | <|sols|><|sot|>I think we should transition to Rust and aim to have it done by the next major release: ... Being written in Rust will help fish continue to be perceived as modern and relevant<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512<|eol|><|sor|>> sorry but citation needed. This statement contradicts the reality I observe
Man, these old timers and their endless worries about "reality" are an endless drag to our omnirust future.<|eor|><|sor|>Ziggy future you mean.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | covercash2 | j6n2txy | <|sols|><|sot|>I think we should transition to Rust and aim to have it done by the next major release: ... Being written in Rust will help fish continue to be perceived as modern and relevant<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512<|eol|><|sor|>CMake is such a great piece of software that is universally loved. it boggles the mind why they would want to use anything else<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kodiologist | j6mnfum | <|sols|><|sot|>I think we should transition to Rust and aim to have it done by the next major release: ... Being written in Rust will help fish continue to be perceived as modern and relevant<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512<|eol|><|sor|>I'm not sure what's sadder, the idea that fish is "perceived as modern and relevant" or the belief that such perceptions matter. That's the kind of clout-chasing that gets you choose Rust over C++ not because you like Rust better, but because you're afraid that all the popular kids using Rust will bully you on the playground for using C++ like the uncool loser you are.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | BillyIII | j6n5rtx | <|sols|><|sot|>I think we should transition to Rust and aim to have it done by the next major release: ... Being written in Rust will help fish continue to be perceived as modern and relevant<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512<|eol|><|sor|>too much implicit unjerk in here. What are the mods doing to keep this place safe and moral?<|eor|><|sor|>Mahatma Gandhi, when asked about subreddit moderation, had this to say:
> We but mirror the world. All the tendencies present in the outer world are to be found in the world of our body. If we could change ourselves, the tendencies in the world would also change. As a man changes his own nature, so does the attitude of the world change towards him. This is the divine mystery supreme. A wonderful thing it is and the source of our happiness. We need not wait to see what others do.
Do your part and report the violations! Mods need the help of their community.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | K4r4kara | j6nkvto | <|sols|><|sot|>I think we should transition to Rust and aim to have it done by the next major release: ... Being written in Rust will help fish continue to be perceived as modern and relevant<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512<|eol|><|sor|>Transition? Wtf is that woke bullshit?<|eor|><|sor|>Rust does things to your sexuality.<|eor|><|sor|>And gender<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | g0liadkin | uuutp2 | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 148 |
programmingcirclejerk | wzdd | i9i1n78 | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>I once wrote a Typescript type checker in McDonald's during my lunch break while eating a cheeseburger. I ran it against the Angular code base and it finished in 0.001ms and found a whole bunch of type bugs which nobody had ever found before. As the output scrolled by all the other customers stood up and clapped and gave me $100.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 223 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | i9hyq1m | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 98 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | i9ihxmp | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>C++? So someone too dumb to know standard ML?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 48 |
programmingcirclejerk | rpkarma | i9jb739 | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>C++? So someone too dumb to know standard ML?<|eor|><|sor|>I use standard ML coz I hate the French<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 46 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | i9iu2xy | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|sor|>Oh my God imagine webshits writing lisp.<|eor|><|sor|>> The Nimble type inferencer required about 30 seconds to type the TAK function given above on a 4 Megabyte Macintosh Plus with a 16MHz 68020 accelerator running Coral Common Lisp. While this is quite slow, it would have been about 100 times slower without the careful tuning of the bit-vector and bit-array manipulation routines described in [Baker90b].
still faster than rustc<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 42 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | i9jawn6 | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|sor|>more than 34 types, rather<|eor|><|sor|>sir does this look like r/statisticscirclejerk<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | PragmaticBoredom | i9k6uvh | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>Who needs 100% compatibility when you have *C++ speed*.
Also shout out to the reply guy who said he would only pay for it if it was written in Rust.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | zickige_zicke | i9jlpji | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>I once wrote a Typescript type checker in McDonald's during my lunch break while eating a cheeseburger. I ran it against the Angular code base and it finished in 0.001ms and found a whole bunch of type bugs which nobody had ever found before. As the output scrolled by all the other customers stood up and clapped and gave me $100.<|eor|><|sor|>True story<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | recycle4science | i9irec6 | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|sor|>Oh my God imagine webshits writing lisp.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | anon25783 | i9iscwb | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|sor|>Oh my God imagine webshits writing lisp.<|eor|><|sor|>websites written in lisp? what, like news.ycombinator.com?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | YM_Industries | i9jr0wt | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>Helps if you know what you are
building. Typescript is not a type checker, it is a programming language that compiles to JS.<|eor|><|sor|>TypeScript is not a type checker, but it does include a typechecker.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | affectation_man | i9o1sax | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>C++? So someone too dumb to know standard ML?<|eor|><|sor|>I use standard ML coz I hate the French<|eor|><|sor|>'ate OCaml
'ate Eiffel
'ate Coq
luv SML
luv Ada
luv Women
Simple as.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | NiceTerm | i9n5vpj | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>I once wrote a Typescript type checker in McDonald's during my lunch break while eating a cheeseburger. I ran it against the Angular code base and it finished in 0.001ms and found a whole bunch of type bugs which nobody had ever found before. As the output scrolled by all the other customers stood up and clapped and gave me $100.<|eor|><|sor|>\> gave me $100
Which caused you to return $95.01 in change, and serve up a happy meal.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | moon-chilled | i9j4wuh | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|sor|>more than 34 types, rather<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | dethnight | i9k3j77 | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>Why doesn't he code it up Assembly? Is he scared?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | avdnl | i9j7leg | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|sor|>Oh my God imagine webshits writing lisp.<|eor|><|sor|>websites written in lisp? what, like news.ycombinator.com?<|eor|><|sor|>Like reddit? Oh sorry, not anymore<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | GhostOfGlennPai | i9j8bgd | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>I can do it in half the time half the cost.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | RepresentativeNo6029 | i9lvp1g | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>If people would pay for it, I have a polynomial time solution to 3-SAT. Its probably approximately correct 98.314% of the time. But I doubt people would pay a dime<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | i9jr8y4 | <|sols|><|sot|>If people would pay for a faster TypeScript type checker, I could write one in C++ within two months that is much faster and 98% compatible with the current version. But I doubt people would pay a dime for it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/MarcJSchmidt/status/1527774080912482304<|eol|><|sor|>98% compatible could be pretty bad, depending on how you slice it. Does it mean 2% of types don't work? People who use more than 50 types are in for trouble then.. No idea how you quantify it, though they probably didn't.
Also just use the [Nimble type inferencer](https://junk.8325.org/hbaker/TInference.html) it is 1990 smh<|eor|><|sor|>It supports every feature except generics.<|eor|><|sor|>good enough for Go before 1.12 I guess<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | ptxgoj | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 151 |
programmingcirclejerk | grapesmoker | hdzcvqh | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>The best part of reading that verge article was the increased feeling of security about my job. In the land of the blind, truly the one-eyed man is king, or at least a senior engineer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 145 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | hdzbr2d | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>10x package layout: put all source files for all projects in one single huge directory and let God sort it out<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 111 |
programmingcirclejerk | freak_dessert2 | hdz68hr | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> The quote tweets of this are filled with people who are precious about Ancient Computer Truths which apparently shouldnt be changed.
> At least Twitter is doing a good job keeping these garbage replies out of my notifications<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 66 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | he03pvh | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>The best part of reading that verge article was the increased feeling of security about my job. In the land of the blind, truly the one-eyed man is king, or at least a senior engineer.<|eor|><|sor|>As a 10xer myself, I normally only associate with other 10xers. Astrophysicists, Nobel Laureates, emacs developers, those sorts of people. Sometimes I wonder, when Im around these people, if Im really all that smart.
Which is why I value my coworkers so much. After all, if I didnt have them, I might completely lose perspective on how smart I actually am.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 62 |
programmingcirclejerk | GOPHERS_GONE_WILD | hdzy7r4 | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>>PM at...
worthless job worthless opinions lmao.
Good to see he's seething about getting raked over the coals by a bunch of turbonerds.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 52 |
programmingcirclejerk | MCRusher | hdz6fur | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>I thought everything was in the almighty cloud?
​
This matter requires more research.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | infinite-red | he0j61v | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Um, OSX and iOS are unix operating systems. In unix they are called "directories", not folders. You cretin. You idiot. You babbling buffoon.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheWheez | he0d95o | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> The quote tweets of this are filled with people who are precious about Ancient Computer Truths which apparently shouldnt be changed.
> At least Twitter is doing a good job keeping these garbage replies out of my notifications<|eor|><|sor|>Damn those greybeards and their Ancient Computer Truths like data structures and human computer interfaces!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 39 |
programmingcirclejerk | YM_Industries | he0kzhz | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Unironically biggest reason I don't have an iPhone is because I fell for the iPod touch meme as a preteen. Upon finding it didn't have "folder support" while "Android did" promptly regarded an unjailbroken iOS device as irredeemable trash and my view on this hasn't changed since.<|eor|><|sor|>Error RD8008: Comment implicitly has 'unjerk' content.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 39 |
programmingcirclejerk | ikatono | he0zu3c | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> The quote tweets of this are filled with people who are precious about Ancient Computer Truths which apparently shouldnt be changed.
> At least Twitter is doing a good job keeping these garbage replies out of my notifications<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Have these people ever written a single program cause holy shit where would main.py or main.cpp go?
Have they ever had two versions of anything, or is that bougie desktop luxury?<|eor|><|sor|>main_old.py
main_old_old.py<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 38 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | he0y6e4 | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> The quote tweets of this are filled with people who are precious about Ancient Computer Truths which apparently shouldnt be changed.
> At least Twitter is doing a good job keeping these garbage replies out of my notifications<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Have these people ever written a single program cause holy shit where would main.py or main.cpp go?
Have they ever had two versions of anything, or is that bougie desktop luxury?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | he03x4t | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>10x package layout: put all source files for all projects in one single huge directory and let God sort it out<|eor|><|sor|>100x project layout: upload all files to npm with package names like [directory]-[subdirectory]-[file]<|eor|><|sor|>1000x project layout: a single smalltalk image<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | doomvox | he0nojh | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Unironically biggest reason I don't have an iPhone is because I fell for the iPod touch meme as a preteen. Upon finding it didn't have "folder support" while "Android did" promptly regarded an unjailbroken iOS device as irredeemable trash and my view on this hasn't changed since.<|eor|><|sor|>Error RD8008: Comment implicitly has 'unjerk' content.<|eor|><|sor|> alias unironically="unjerk"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | integralWorker | he0b0fw | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Unironically biggest reason I don't have an iPhone is because I fell for the iPod touch meme as a preteen. Upon finding it didn't have "folder support" while "Android did" promptly regarded an unjailbroken iOS device as irredeemable trash and my view on this hasn't changed since.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | scavno | hdzbpr1 | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>
import github.ru/potin/ungjerk
I dont actually give a shit whilst on my phone.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | Blaz3 | he1vig2 | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Well the tweet is gone, but I'll still jerk.
I totally agree, but I think people aren't going far enough. For example, when I go and buy something, clothes, food, electronics, furniture, I just dump it in a gigantic pile in the middle of my house.
Then every time I need something, I just search for it. It's a nice easy flat structure where I know where everything is, because it's all together.
Thanks apple, finally life is easier<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | he030zo | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>>PM at...
worthless job worthless opinions lmao.
Good to see he's seething about getting raked over the coals by a bunch of turbonerds.<|eor|><|sor|>> Good to see he's seething about getting raked over the coals by a bunch of turbonerds.
Gotta appreciate the Linuses of the world.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | he0ytqs | <|sols|><|sot|>It took a decade, but Apple just completely removed the need for understanding files and folders with the iPhone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/thijsniks/status/1440766272162070529?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>I am surprised that a file system even exists on an iphone.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj All the underlying stuff needs one.
These people are talking about how humans don't need one as if a computer is just a thing you plop down and use.
The filesystem is there so that programs can interact, and so that humans can interact with programs in the well-defined way that is expected by programs.
Saying "Just search lol" is saying "I never had to automate anything more complex than a toaster in my entire life"
/rj I _am_ **VERY** SMART<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | alibix | psb37i | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 148 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Theory | hdop75d | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>I havent read a single paper in 49 years and dont intend to start now<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 96 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | hdojul7 | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Jon Blow?
*clicks*
Jon Blow. Also aren't you supposed to not hire idiots rather than debug bugs they write? Also also Smalltalk solved debugging in 1976 but Jon wouldn't know that cause it's not used in AAA games.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 77 |
programmingcirclejerk | NeverComments | hdonj9z | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> Confusing the issue is that the entire Web social scene is about not knowing the past, and reinventing things that were already done 5 times in the past (but worse this time because the foundations are less stable and computers are less understood).
Wheres the lie<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 75 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | hdp40id | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>I havent read a single paper in 49 years and dont intend to start now<|eor|><|sor|>The Golang of people.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 73 |
programmingcirclejerk | satanikimplegarida | hdomwyu | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>/unjerk
It's time to talk about the elephant in the room openly: does rule 3 apply to JBlow posts?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 72 |
programmingcirclejerk | RustEvangelist10xer | hdom035 | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Software technology stopped advancing? Please. Let me ask you this: when was Rust invented? When was Go invented? When did we start enjoying all the niceties of functional programming in .5xer languages?
Stalled? Pffft.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 57 |
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | hdp8u16 | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Jon Blow?
*clicks*
Jon Blow. Also aren't you supposed to not hire idiots rather than debug bugs they write? Also also Smalltalk solved debugging in 1976 but Jon wouldn't know that cause it's not used in AAA games.<|eor|><|sor|>As a smalltalker, and maybe related to the subject, I'd like to see mathematical proof of correctness apply to this language/system. That would be so neat!
Anyway glad you mentioned smalltalk which is amazing.
And I think that most of the research has been done before the 80s. Now we just have more tools and means to share it.<|eor|><|sor|>wait are you /uj or /j<|eor|><|sor|>In Smalltalk these concepts are merged.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmingcirclejerk | OctagonClock | hdp5az3 | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|soopr|>/uj honestly I'm undecided. I'm not informed enough or old enough really to make a judgement. Maybe he has a point at least with regards to "software creation technology"? I just don't have any opposing views and I see a lot of these "good old days" type things a lot and rarely the opposite.
If anyone more educated could argue in favour or against...<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj
If you stay around long enough you'll start seeing people getting excited about "new" ideas that are the exact same "new" ideas circulating now. They're always big concepts that pitch well, but don't play out in practice how people hope. For example, microservices are basically the exact same thing that services were supposed to be in the 90s and 00s. For example, the FP weenery that's seeping into OOP languages now is so diluted that it's just sugar on top of the same OOP shit that we've been doing since the 80s. For example, parser combinators are just a special snowflake variety of recursive descent. For example, Docker images are just statically linked programs with extra steps, one of which includes dynamic linking. For example, JITting is an impossible to benchmark and unreliable version of profile guided AoT. For example, unit tests are an old concept, and are always misunderstood by the people who champion them the most.
There have been advancements, but compare 1960 to 1990, and then compare 1990 to 2020, and you'll see a stagnant field that's more interested in following aesthetic trends than making better, more ambitious software.
Let me put it this way: Most coders now spend their days working on over-engineered webforms that don't do anything that webforms from 15 years ago couldn't do, and yet somehow they manage to be orders of magnitude heavier. We have incredible hardware sold at ridiculously low prices, and this is how we're using so much of it? That's shameful.<|eor|><|sor|>Critical warning: Long unjerk detected. Deploying Eurofighters.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | hdozx2f | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> Confusing the issue is that the entire Web social scene is about not knowing the past, and reinventing things that were already done 5 times in the past (but worse this time because the foundations are less stable and computers are less understood).
Wheres the lie<|eor|><|sor|>It was actually done 6 times in the past.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | hdozqqo | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>/unjerk
It's time to talk about the elephant in the room openly: does rule 3 apply to JBlow posts?<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
Why would it? He's right more often than he's wrong. He's not crazy, he's just cranky and needs his binkie.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | alibix | hdol0ne | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Jon Blow?
*clicks*
Jon Blow. Also aren't you supposed to not hire idiots rather than debug bugs they write? Also also Smalltalk solved debugging in 1976 but Jon wouldn't know that cause it's not used in AAA games.<|eor|><|soopr|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440093616018362373?s=19
He mentions GC here. I concur really. Sure it's important for the small minded developers who cannot manage memory but that isn't a *real* advancement.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 38 |
programmingcirclejerk | YM_Industries | hdp8k1z | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Software technology stopped advancing? Please. Let me ask you this: when was Rust invented? When was Go invented? When did we start enjoying all the niceties of functional programming in .5xer languages?
Stalled? Pffft.<|eor|><|sor|>Go is proof that software technology is regressing. Generics have been around since the 1980s.<|eor|><|sor|>Sir, this is pcj. Are you lost?<|eor|><|sor|>Do you think my lolnogenerics comment isn't jerk?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 38 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | hdp1jqo | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|soopr|>/uj honestly I'm undecided. I'm not informed enough or old enough really to make a judgement. Maybe he has a point at least with regards to "software creation technology"? I just don't have any opposing views and I see a lot of these "good old days" type things a lot and rarely the opposite.
If anyone more educated could argue in favour or against...<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj
If you stay around long enough you'll start seeing people getting excited about "new" ideas that are the exact same "new" ideas circulating now. They're always big concepts that pitch well, but don't play out in practice how people hope. For example, microservices are basically the exact same thing that services were supposed to be in the 90s and 00s. For example, the FP weenery that's seeping into OOP languages now is so diluted that it's just sugar on top of the same OOP shit that we've been doing since the 80s. For example, parser combinators are just a special snowflake variety of recursive descent. For example, Docker images are just statically linked programs with extra steps, one of which includes dynamic linking. For example, JITting is an impossible to benchmark and unreliable version of profile guided AoT. For example, unit tests are an old concept, and are always misunderstood by the people who champion them the most.
There have been advancements, but compare 1960 to 1990, and then compare 1990 to 2020, and you'll see a stagnant field that's more interested in following aesthetic trends than making better, more ambitious software.
Let me put it this way: Most coders now spend their days working on over-engineered webforms that don't do anything that webforms from 15 years ago couldn't do, and yet somehow they manage to be orders of magnitude heavier. We have incredible hardware sold at ridiculously low prices, and this is how we're using so much of it? That's shameful.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | Shikadi297 | hdombhk | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | YM_Industries | hdp3hdy | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Software technology stopped advancing? Please. Let me ask you this: when was Rust invented? When was Go invented? When did we start enjoying all the niceties of functional programming in .5xer languages?
Stalled? Pffft.<|eor|><|sor|>Go is proof that software technology is regressing. Generics have been around since the 1980s.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | glider97 | hdpihgf | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>I havent read a single paper in 49 years and dont intend to start now<|eor|><|sor|>The Golang of people.<|eor|><|sor|>Im stealing this insult.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | earthisunderattack | hdoysrk | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Step right up everyone! Step right up. Extra! Extra! Jon Blow says the 10xer is dead in his weekly cope column! Read all about it!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | OctagonClock | hdoqwp7 | <|sols|><|sot|>This weekend I gave a speech saying that software technology has mostly stopped advancing, and stalled sometime in the mid-1990s. I had difficulty convincing many people (and seemed inable to communicate the idea clearly).<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1440034780209303559?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>https://i.imgur.com/YAXxqQW.png<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | RainOnYourTirade | ofsdrk | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 147 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | h4emeg4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>and here i thought "proof of work" meant punching in my hours or showing that my code runs. i never knew employment could be so easy!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 80 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | h4fkvfd | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>> ## Will you Rewrite it in Rust (TM)?
>
> ~~It wouldn't be too hard. Feel free to submit a pull request whose commit hash starts with at least 32 zero bits.~~I have received news that someone is doing this.
Oh well thank God that someone is!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | RainOnYourTirade | h4eprqi | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|soopr|>It makes your commit hashes start with a lot of zeroes. Git is a blockchain and we should start acting like it, so now you can mint gitcoins with this program.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | h4ewn3r | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|soopr|>It makes your commit hashes start with a lot of zeroes. Git is a blockchain and we should start acting like it, so now you can mint gitcoins with this program.<|eoopr|><|sor|>This is perfect for my team where we address commits by prefix. I'm gonna have so much fun with this<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 38 |
programmingcirclejerk | xmcqdpt2 | h4f4o6o | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I know what I'm doing every April 1st from now on<|eor|><|sor|>this one
https://github.com/not-an-aardvark/lucky-commit
is even better because you can customize your prefix to whatever you want.
abadbabe?
b16b00b5?
deadd00d?
the choice is yours.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | h4eyxk8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>and here i thought "proof of work" meant punching in my hours or showing that my code runs. i never knew employment could be so easy!<|eor|><|sor|>Proof of Work means finding a bug in a downstream system, complaining that it is blocking my entire story, moving it to the next sprint, and kicking back on my balcony with a bottle of Ciroc and a pack of Camel's while a utility I wrote moves my mouse every 4:59 to make sure Teams stays online.<|eor|><|sor|>Does proof of work require wearing pants? I don't want to wear pants.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | pctammela | h4f7tyb | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>Virgin commit hash: random useless characters
Chad commit hash: a lot of leading zeros for no reason<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | Infernio | h4gonkh | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>> ## Will you Rewrite it in Rust (TM)?
>
> ~~It wouldn't be too hard. Feel free to submit a pull request whose commit hash starts with at least 32 zero bits.~~I have received news that someone is doing this.
Oh well thank God that someone is!<|eor|><|sor|>> There is also [lucky-commit, written in Rust](https://github.com/not-an-aardvark/lucky-commit), that has the same idea as git-power, but with GPU acceleration and the ability to choose a custom prefix. Looks like their Rust implementation (with or without GPU) is significantly faster than this C++ implementation. **Crab language wins again, so it seems.**
Was there ever any doubt?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | NakeyDooCrew | h4ewlgx | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|soopr|>It makes your commit hashes start with a lot of zeroes. Git is a blockchain and we should start acting like it, so now you can mint gitcoins with this program.<|eoopr|><|sor|>In the future you won't be paid for the code you write - rather you will write the code just for the opportunity to mint gitcoins. Every occupation will have it's own currency, and every product must be purchased in its own currency. It's all the convenience of straight up bartering for everything but with extra steps and carbon emissions.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | minhaz1217 | h4eopls | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | h4ff3hp | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|soopr|>It makes your commit hashes start with a lot of zeroes. Git is a blockchain and we should start acting like it, so now you can mint gitcoins with this program.<|eoopr|><|sor|>https://gitcoin.co/<|eor|><|sor|>>web3 technology like open source protocols and decentralized blockchains
tf is this
>Growing networks with aligned incentives towards the wellbeing of each participant and the system as a whole. Through distributed funding and organizations, we build together toward our shared goals.
hey I know we joke a lot about blockchain being a cult, but like, is this an actual cult<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | h4ewkpv | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I know what I'm doing every April 1st from now on<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | general656 | h4etm4b | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|soopr|>It makes your commit hashes start with a lot of zeroes. Git is a blockchain and we should start acting like it, so now you can mint gitcoins with this program.<|eoopr|><|sor|>No ... No .... nooooooooo. NO!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | sebamestre | h4frxca | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>and here i thought "proof of work" meant punching in my hours or showing that my code runs. i never knew employment could be so easy!<|eor|><|sor|>Proof of Work means finding a bug in a downstream system, complaining that it is blocking my entire story, moving it to the next sprint, and kicking back on my balcony with a bottle of Ciroc and a pack of Camel's while a utility I wrote moves my mouse every 4:59 to make sure Teams stays online.<|eor|><|sor|>Exactly. That's where the 'block' in blockchain comes from.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | Infernio | h4gozir | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I know what I'm doing every April 1st from now on<|eor|><|sor|>this one
https://github.com/not-an-aardvark/lucky-commit
is even better because you can customize your prefix to whatever you want.
abadbabe?
b16b00b5?
deadd00d?
the choice is yours.<|eor|><|sor|>It's also written in _**Rust**_ <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | h4fzqam | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|soopr|>It makes your commit hashes start with a lot of zeroes. Git is a blockchain and we should start acting like it, so now you can mint gitcoins with this program.<|eoopr|><|sor|>https://gitcoin.co/<|eor|><|sor|>>web3 technology like open source protocols and decentralized blockchains
tf is this
>Growing networks with aligned incentives towards the wellbeing of each participant and the system as a whole. Through distributed funding and organizations, we build together toward our shared goals.
hey I know we joke a lot about blockchain being a cult, but like, is this an actual cult<|eor|><|sor|>Etherium contracts n such.
Metamask is an example of a tool that can transact on the blockchain. Here is web3 specifically.
https://web3js.readthedocs.io/en/v1.3.4/
Socialism.
I dont think they are forcing anyone or anything, socialism is like paying firefighters and legit obvious things to do.<|eor|><|sor|>The software industry is pretty much at the apex of power, wealth, and privilege over the entire world, and we've somehow convinced ourselves that socialism is giving money to each other by investing in fake currency<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | swimmermroe | h4eyxsr | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|soopr|>It makes your commit hashes start with a lot of zeroes. Git is a blockchain and we should start acting like it, so now you can mint gitcoins with this program.<|eoopr|><|sor|>https://gitcoin.co/<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | CAPSLOCK_USERNAME | h4g1xz1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>I have read the readme at least 7-10 times. I still have no idea what this repo does... Can someone please explain? I would really appreciated it.<|eor|><|sor|>It uses the same "proof of work" algorithm bitcoin does. It tweaks some non-printing data in the commit header randomly, then computes the cryptographic hash. Repeat with random data brute-force style until you get a hash with the characterstics you want (in this case, N leading zeroes).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | h4htf74 | <|sols|><|sot|>Some joke about "Git is a blockchain" went too far, now we have this.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/CouleeApps/git-power<|eol|><|sor|>> ## Will you Rewrite it in Rust (TM)?
>
> ~~It wouldn't be too hard. Feel free to submit a pull request whose commit hash starts with at least 32 zero bits.~~I have received news that someone is doing this.
Oh well thank God that someone is!<|eor|><|sor|>> There is also [lucky-commit, written in Rust](https://github.com/not-an-aardvark/lucky-commit), that has the same idea as git-power, but with GPU acceleration and the ability to choose a custom prefix. Looks like their Rust implementation (with or without GPU) is significantly faster than this C++ implementation. **Crab language wins again, so it seems.**
Was there ever any doubt?<|eor|><|sor|>> Was there ever any doubt?
Plaudits to all involved!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | hedgehog1024 | j6014m | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 149 |
programmingcirclejerk | orgulodfan82 | g7vhbal | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>No big deal. Go has a lot of generic algorithms that make for loops unnecessary most of the time.
Oh, nevermind, I was thinking of every language other than Go.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 159 |
programmingcirclejerk | hedgehog1024 | g7vjfoe | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>Simply write loops as tail recursion and inline the recursive calls.<|eor|><|soopr|>/uj
They unironically suggest using goto as workaround. Probably the funniest part is that it actually helps.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 103 |
programmingcirclejerk | lordlicorice | g7vql03 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>I swear to god, if golang could get away with it they'd declare that loops are "too complex" and make programmers copy/paste unroll their loops. All loops have statically-determinable upper bounds when you have finite memory, right?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 74 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | g7vn7id | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>How can you be so ignorant about core feature of the language "for loops"?
Rob pike: no. Core feature of the language is ignorance.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 64 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | g7w9k4k | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>Simply write loops as tail recursion and inline the recursive calls.<|eor|><|soopr|>/uj
They unironically suggest using goto as workaround. Probably the funniest part is that it actually helps.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Sounds very blue-collar. None of that ivory-tower "looping"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 57 |
programmingcirclejerk | hedgehog1024 | g7vepcq | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|soopr|>Jerk while you can because [the fix is on the way](https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/256459/)<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | hedgehog1024 | g7vjc9m | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>No big deal. Go has a lot of generic algorithms that make for loops unnecessary most of the time.
Oh, nevermind, I was thinking of every language other than Go.<|eor|><|soopr|>It's for loops all the way down.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | g7w02lk | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>I swear to god, if golang could get away with it they'd declare that loops are "too complex" and make programmers copy/paste unroll their loops. All loops have statically-determinable upper bounds when you have finite memory, right?<|eor|><|sor|>Hey, NASA does it! So it must be good!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | haulwhore | g7w6oyq | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>Gophers be like, yeah thats why we have the goto keyword<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | g7vtqni | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>Just don't use functions. If you want to inline code, inline the code, don't need a compiler for it. Do you live in the 70s where you need to preserve space for your code or something like this?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | hedgehog1024 | g7wnjvh | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|soopr|>Jerk while you can because [the fix is on the way](https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/256459/)<|eoopr|><|sor|>Not for labeled for-loops<|eor|><|soopr|>Who needs them anyway? Labeled for loops is an indicator of excessive complexity in your program. Go helps you to keep your program simple.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | silentconfessor | g7ws6hm | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|soopr|>Jerk while you can because [the fix is on the way](https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/256459/)<|eoopr|><|sor|>Not for labeled for-loops<|eor|><|soopr|>Who needs them anyway? Labeled for loops is an indicator of excessive complexity in your program. Go helps you to keep your program simple.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Go helps you keep your program simple by silently imposing a performance penalty on all code that doesn't conform to its arbitrary standards.
Oh wait, that's actually all garbage-collected languages.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | g7w4ic4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>Go: the language whose features is that it has none.
That tag line becomes ever more accurate the more we learn about Go.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | Noughmad | g7w0f52 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go compiler can't inline functions with for loops (since at least 2016)<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14768<|eol|><|sor|>I've never used ~~inline functions with~~ for loops, and I've never missed them.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.