subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | 32gbsd | h7cgpv5 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm always amazed when people ship cool software with what I judge to be crappy, obsolete, or even downright dangerous processes/practices. Yet even though I (by my own judgement) use superior processes and practices (VSCode + Git + CI pipelines, etc.), I haven't shipped anything nearly as cool.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18399474<|eol|><|sor|>Shipped anything at all?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | YqQbey | h7cui92 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm always amazed when people ship cool software with what I judge to be crappy, obsolete, or even downright dangerous processes/practices. Yet even though I (by my own judgement) use superior processes and practices (VSCode + Git + CI pipelines, etc.), I haven't shipped anything nearly as cool.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18399474<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>I'm the type to constantly look for better tooling/editors/frameworks and get tired of "working" before actually starting the project.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | h7hemx0 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm always amazed when people ship cool software with what I judge to be crappy, obsolete, or even downright dangerous processes/practices. Yet even though I (by my own judgement) use superior processes and practices (VSCode + Git + CI pipelines, etc.), I haven't shipped anything nearly as cool.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18399474<|eol|><|sor|>I painted flames on the side of my car; why isn't it going faster?<|eor|><|sor|>because you didn't take out the muffler, you dingus. it can't just look fast, it has to sound fast, too<|eor|><|sor|>also it needs to smell fast. Smother that car with some KFC chicken pieces. Fast food = fast smell.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | CoinForWares | nkh6xj | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 143 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | gzdgbgy | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 165 |
programmingcirclejerk | Flesh_Bike | gzd2c6b | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>You know what looks even better? 5<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 118 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gzdjw4q | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|sor|>Please tell me youre a consultant. We need someone like you to help set the direction of our enterprise architecture.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 102 |
programmingcirclejerk | CoinForWares | gzd72hj | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>You know what looks even better? 5<|eor|><|soopr|>sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to evaluate expressions. i personally like the look of 2 + 3 more than 5<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 73 |
programmingcirclejerk | roguas | gzdmbca | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|sor|>Please tell me youre a consultant. We need someone like you to help set the direction of our enterprise architecture.<|eor|><|sor|>Your enterprise architecture is bad. You should do more microservices, more kubernetes, more serverless. Generally more.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 73 |
programmingcirclejerk | roguas | gzdm8el | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|sor|>1. always start with factory
2. if you start with factory always start with abstractFactory<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | THICC_DICC_PRICC | gzdvr7a | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|sor|>Please tell me youre a consultant. We need someone like you to help set the direction of our enterprise architecture.<|eor|><|sor|>Your enterprise architecture is bad. You should do more microservices, more kubernetes, more serverless. Generally more.<|eor|><|sor|>...and that would be $5000. Let me know when you hit a road block so I can come back and say thats not a true micro service architecture for another $5000<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | G3Kappa | gzdg79e | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>You know what looks even better? 5<|eor|><|soopr|>sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to evaluate expressions. i personally like the look of 2 + 3 more than 5<|eoopr|><|sor|>Sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to define natural numbers. I for one prefer the look of `2 succ 3` much better than `2 + 3`.<|eor|><|sor|>Sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to define numbers. I for one prefer the look of `s(s(s(s(s(0)))))` much better than `2 succ 3`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | Infernio | gzdpdmc | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|> In [3]: %timeit f_5(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
130 ns 3.42 ns per loop (mean std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000000 loops each)
In [4]: %timeit c_5(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
982 ns 122 ns per loop (mean std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
Absolutely nuking whatever performance Python had left to own the Haskallers <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 48 |
programmingcirclejerk | Clockwork757 | gzeanwj | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|sor|>You should really be wrapping those integer literals with classes for ergonomics.
class Two {
private static final int two = 2;
int getTwo() {
return self.two
}
}
class Three {
private static final int three = 3;
int getThree() {
return self.three
}
}
New Adder()
.addNumber((New Two()).getTwo())
.addNumber((New Three()).getThree())
.getSum()<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | syndbg | gzdjpz8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>>Why you might want to go on a date with me give me a job
The about page tho<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | purely-dysfunctional | gzdxxbv | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>Enthusiastic youngster<|eor|><|sor|>Nah, according to his "about me" section the picture is from 2012 so he's fair game.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | 757DrDuck | gzdre1f | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>You know what looks even better? 5<|eor|><|soopr|>sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to evaluate expressions. i personally like the look of 2 + 3 more than 5<|eoopr|><|sor|>Sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to define natural numbers. I for one prefer the look of `2 succ 3` much better than `2 + 3`.<|eor|><|sor|>Sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to define numbers. I for one prefer the look of `s(s(s(s(s(0)))))` much better than `2 succ 3`<|eor|><|sor|>_Principia Mathematica_ has entered chat.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | BufferUnderpants | gze2dvw | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|sor|>Make `addNumber` return `void` for a true Java < 1.8 vintage feel.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | hellishcookie | gzeftsk | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|> In [3]: %timeit f_5(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
130 ns 3.42 ns per loop (mean std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000000 loops each)
In [4]: %timeit c_5(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
982 ns 122 ns per loop (mean std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
Absolutely nuking whatever performance Python had left to own the Haskallers <|eor|><|sor|>lol imagine caring about irrelevancies like performance in a language thats not turing complete currying is purely for aesthetics (NOT math (see ur flair) (code was meant to be read (reddit IS a lisp)))!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | smurfkiller013 | gzdy4qr | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>I like the look of
New Adder()
.addNumber(2)
.addNumber(3)
.getSum()
to
add(2)(3)<|eor|><|sor|>1. always start with factory
2. if you start with factory always start with abstractFactory<|eor|><|sor|>Then make a factory factory
/uj I wish I couldn't say I've seen this in the wild<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | LeeHide | gzdgqvo | <|sols|><|sot|>Sometimes it can also be a stylistic choice to curry functions. I for one prefer the look of add(2)(3) much better than add(2, 3).<|eot|><|sol|>https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-currying/<|eol|><|sor|>You know what looks even better? 5<|eor|><|soopr|>sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to evaluate expressions. i personally like the look of 2 + 3 more than 5<|eoopr|><|sor|>Sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to define natural numbers. I for one prefer the look of `2 succ 3` much better than `2 + 3`.<|eor|><|sor|>Sometimes it can be a stylistic choice to define numbers. I for one prefer the look of `s(s(s(s(s(0)))))` much better than `2 succ 3`<|eor|><|sor|>prolog moment<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | te_9 | n5ri56 | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 141 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gx39tai | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Hey guys, Jon here (founder, principal innovation engineer, and YC class of 18).
I dont see what the issue is. If you cant afford it just cram some leet code and get a job at a FAANG.
For those who are already there, let me take this opportunity to clear up some misunderstandings, because PG and the other VCs and I talked a lot about this over the weeks, and we know it may be difficult for some of you to realize the value proposition here.
Look, Im tired of hearing the luddites complain about every innovative, disruptive tech that comes along. This is a revolutionary advancement in safety. Through a sophisticated suite of builtin sensors, and a unique over the air monitoring service, our Safety As A Service offering can track millions of individual data points about your unique driving characteristics, what makes you, *you*. Combined with our advanced AIs, we are able to dynamically adjust your safety profile in real time to make your life safer and more convenient in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago. For example, the breathalyzer can measure your microbrew intake and recommend a nearby coffee shop to stop and pretend to sober up, and by leveraging our large affiliate network, recommend one with an available coupon. We can monitor your route and suggest alternate routes that avoid the homeless. When the active camera detects a nearby el camino or drum circle, the builtin HUD can display nearby dispensaries that have been vetted to only have strains that are guaranteed not to induce an unsafe
body buzz. By monitoring your mood we can suggest the exact EDM mix that will keep you focused and safe. And If you link your gear to a Facebook, Amazon, or Google account, we can learn from your social and financial history precisely how much you should pay for insurance, and offer a plan through our partners that appears to be cheaper.
The ~~recurring subscription fees~~ opportunities are endless, and if some doomsayers cant see that, well, youre welcome to ride the bus with the poor people.
If our vision excites you and you want to join us shape the future of safety service, feel free to send me a DMwe are growing rapidly and hiring engineers across the board (legal engineers, lobbyist engineers, dark pattern scientists, adtech devs, forward deployed claims engineers, and more!).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 189 |
programmingcirclejerk | RAKtheUndead | gx32pil | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>"Safety as a service".
/uj This is fucking horrifying.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 109 |
programmingcirclejerk | Moarbid_Krabs | gx339g3 | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>```releaseJerkConstraints();```
How is this even legal? I see a nasty lawsuit in Klim's future as soon as someone with a lapsed subscription has an accident.
```enableJerkConstraints();```
It WOULD be Klim pushing some shit like this.
Guess the weekend-warrior ADV dads on overpriced KTMs and BMWs that are the motorcycle equivalent of lifted "off-road" pickup trucks only used for getting groceries that make up their customer base needed something new to waste money on instead of actually going out and riding.
I for one support this new "haddalayerdown" tax if these morons wanna keep wrecking out and jacking up my insurance premiums because they never learned how to corner properly or ride defensively.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 42 |
programmingcirclejerk | fundriedtomatoes | gx362am | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>```releaseJerkConstraints();```
How is this even legal? I see a nasty lawsuit in Klim's future as soon as someone with a lapsed subscription has an accident.
```enableJerkConstraints();```
It WOULD be Klim pushing some shit like this.
Guess the weekend-warrior ADV dads on overpriced KTMs and BMWs that are the motorcycle equivalent of lifted "off-road" pickup trucks only used for getting groceries that make up their customer base needed something new to waste money on instead of actually going out and riding.
I for one support this new "haddalayerdown" tax if these morons wanna keep wrecking out and jacking up my insurance premiums because they never learned how to corner properly or ride defensively.<|eor|><|sor|>I wouldnt want one knowing theres a block of code inside it that determines whether the air bag is or isnt going to deploy. Even if I was a paying customer that thing is going to mess up now and then<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | LunaPowder | gx3527u | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>"Safety as a service".
/uj This is fucking horrifying.<|eor|><|sor|>Service as a safety substitute<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | avinassh | gx4cw7x | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Hey guys, Jon here (founder, principal innovation engineer, and YC class of 18).
I dont see what the issue is. If you cant afford it just cram some leet code and get a job at a FAANG.
For those who are already there, let me take this opportunity to clear up some misunderstandings, because PG and the other VCs and I talked a lot about this over the weeks, and we know it may be difficult for some of you to realize the value proposition here.
Look, Im tired of hearing the luddites complain about every innovative, disruptive tech that comes along. This is a revolutionary advancement in safety. Through a sophisticated suite of builtin sensors, and a unique over the air monitoring service, our Safety As A Service offering can track millions of individual data points about your unique driving characteristics, what makes you, *you*. Combined with our advanced AIs, we are able to dynamically adjust your safety profile in real time to make your life safer and more convenient in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago. For example, the breathalyzer can measure your microbrew intake and recommend a nearby coffee shop to stop and pretend to sober up, and by leveraging our large affiliate network, recommend one with an available coupon. We can monitor your route and suggest alternate routes that avoid the homeless. When the active camera detects a nearby el camino or drum circle, the builtin HUD can display nearby dispensaries that have been vetted to only have strains that are guaranteed not to induce an unsafe
body buzz. By monitoring your mood we can suggest the exact EDM mix that will keep you focused and safe. And If you link your gear to a Facebook, Amazon, or Google account, we can learn from your social and financial history precisely how much you should pay for insurance, and offer a plan through our partners that appears to be cheaper.
The ~~recurring subscription fees~~ opportunities are endless, and if some doomsayers cant see that, well, youre welcome to ride the bus with the poor people.
If our vision excites you and you want to join us shape the future of safety service, feel free to send me a DMwe are growing rapidly and hiring engineers across the board (legal engineers, lobbyist engineers, dark pattern scientists, adtech devs, forward deployed claims engineers, and more!).<|eor|><|sor|>I write Haskell, any jobs for me?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | a45ed6cs7s | gx4pran | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Hey guys, Jon here (founder, principal innovation engineer, and YC class of 18).
I dont see what the issue is. If you cant afford it just cram some leet code and get a job at a FAANG.
For those who are already there, let me take this opportunity to clear up some misunderstandings, because PG and the other VCs and I talked a lot about this over the weeks, and we know it may be difficult for some of you to realize the value proposition here.
Look, Im tired of hearing the luddites complain about every innovative, disruptive tech that comes along. This is a revolutionary advancement in safety. Through a sophisticated suite of builtin sensors, and a unique over the air monitoring service, our Safety As A Service offering can track millions of individual data points about your unique driving characteristics, what makes you, *you*. Combined with our advanced AIs, we are able to dynamically adjust your safety profile in real time to make your life safer and more convenient in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago. For example, the breathalyzer can measure your microbrew intake and recommend a nearby coffee shop to stop and pretend to sober up, and by leveraging our large affiliate network, recommend one with an available coupon. We can monitor your route and suggest alternate routes that avoid the homeless. When the active camera detects a nearby el camino or drum circle, the builtin HUD can display nearby dispensaries that have been vetted to only have strains that are guaranteed not to induce an unsafe
body buzz. By monitoring your mood we can suggest the exact EDM mix that will keep you focused and safe. And If you link your gear to a Facebook, Amazon, or Google account, we can learn from your social and financial history precisely how much you should pay for insurance, and offer a plan through our partners that appears to be cheaper.
The ~~recurring subscription fees~~ opportunities are endless, and if some doomsayers cant see that, well, youre welcome to ride the bus with the poor people.
If our vision excites you and you want to join us shape the future of safety service, feel free to send me a DMwe are growing rapidly and hiring engineers across the board (legal engineers, lobbyist engineers, dark pattern scientists, adtech devs, forward deployed claims engineers, and more!).<|eor|><|sor|>I write Haskell, any jobs for me?<|eor|><|sor|>Janitor position is open, i heard.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | avinassh | gx4qs2j | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Hey guys, Jon here (founder, principal innovation engineer, and YC class of 18).
I dont see what the issue is. If you cant afford it just cram some leet code and get a job at a FAANG.
For those who are already there, let me take this opportunity to clear up some misunderstandings, because PG and the other VCs and I talked a lot about this over the weeks, and we know it may be difficult for some of you to realize the value proposition here.
Look, Im tired of hearing the luddites complain about every innovative, disruptive tech that comes along. This is a revolutionary advancement in safety. Through a sophisticated suite of builtin sensors, and a unique over the air monitoring service, our Safety As A Service offering can track millions of individual data points about your unique driving characteristics, what makes you, *you*. Combined with our advanced AIs, we are able to dynamically adjust your safety profile in real time to make your life safer and more convenient in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago. For example, the breathalyzer can measure your microbrew intake and recommend a nearby coffee shop to stop and pretend to sober up, and by leveraging our large affiliate network, recommend one with an available coupon. We can monitor your route and suggest alternate routes that avoid the homeless. When the active camera detects a nearby el camino or drum circle, the builtin HUD can display nearby dispensaries that have been vetted to only have strains that are guaranteed not to induce an unsafe
body buzz. By monitoring your mood we can suggest the exact EDM mix that will keep you focused and safe. And If you link your gear to a Facebook, Amazon, or Google account, we can learn from your social and financial history precisely how much you should pay for insurance, and offer a plan through our partners that appears to be cheaper.
The ~~recurring subscription fees~~ opportunities are endless, and if some doomsayers cant see that, well, youre welcome to ride the bus with the poor people.
If our vision excites you and you want to join us shape the future of safety service, feel free to send me a DMwe are growing rapidly and hiring engineers across the board (legal engineers, lobbyist engineers, dark pattern scientists, adtech devs, forward deployed claims engineers, and more!).<|eor|><|sor|>I write Haskell, any jobs for me?<|eor|><|sor|>Janitor position is open, i heard.<|eor|><|sor|>I said Haskell, not Golang<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | RecDep | gx3feu3 | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Its ~~expensive~~ deadly to be poor.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | PC__LOAD__LETTER | gx49c4o | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>I cant jerk to this. How dystopian.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | Moarbid_Krabs | gx36ia8 | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>"Safety as a service".
/uj This is fucking horrifying.<|eor|><|sor|>The ADV riders who buy shit like this are the motorcycle equivalent of those "outdoorsy" people spending thousands of dollars at REI on gear just to show off once when they go glamping or day-hiking.
KTM (The poster child company for overpriced status symbol "off-road" bikes) pioneered the firmware performance unlock bullshit Tesla gets called out for years before Tesla did.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | tesch34 | gx3cees | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>just rewrite it in rust<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | Moarbid_Krabs | gx38jlf | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>```releaseJerkConstraints();```
How is this even legal? I see a nasty lawsuit in Klim's future as soon as someone with a lapsed subscription has an accident.
```enableJerkConstraints();```
It WOULD be Klim pushing some shit like this.
Guess the weekend-warrior ADV dads on overpriced KTMs and BMWs that are the motorcycle equivalent of lifted "off-road" pickup trucks only used for getting groceries that make up their customer base needed something new to waste money on instead of actually going out and riding.
I for one support this new "haddalayerdown" tax if these morons wanna keep wrecking out and jacking up my insurance premiums because they never learned how to corner properly or ride defensively.<|eor|><|sor|>I wouldnt want one knowing theres a block of code inside it that determines whether the air bag is or isnt going to deploy. Even if I was a paying customer that thing is going to mess up now and then<|eor|><|sor|>My thoughts exactly.
I'm all for ATGATT and anything that makes riding safer but not if it's something like this that's failure prone and provides a false sense of security.
It's why a lot of riders still refuse to use ABS or automatic traction control even if it came built in to their bikes.
It's great when it works as intended but too often it just ends up being a crutch that prevents newer riders from developing good skills and habits or engaging precisely when you don't want it to and causing very dangerous situations out of nowhere.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | dfirecmv | gx48ter | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Hey guys, Jon here (founder, principal innovation engineer, and YC class of 18).
I dont see what the issue is. If you cant afford it just cram some leet code and get a job at a FAANG.
For those who are already there, let me take this opportunity to clear up some misunderstandings, because PG and the other VCs and I talked a lot about this over the weeks, and we know it may be difficult for some of you to realize the value proposition here.
Look, Im tired of hearing the luddites complain about every innovative, disruptive tech that comes along. This is a revolutionary advancement in safety. Through a sophisticated suite of builtin sensors, and a unique over the air monitoring service, our Safety As A Service offering can track millions of individual data points about your unique driving characteristics, what makes you, *you*. Combined with our advanced AIs, we are able to dynamically adjust your safety profile in real time to make your life safer and more convenient in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago. For example, the breathalyzer can measure your microbrew intake and recommend a nearby coffee shop to stop and pretend to sober up, and by leveraging our large affiliate network, recommend one with an available coupon. We can monitor your route and suggest alternate routes that avoid the homeless. When the active camera detects a nearby el camino or drum circle, the builtin HUD can display nearby dispensaries that have been vetted to only have strains that are guaranteed not to induce an unsafe
body buzz. By monitoring your mood we can suggest the exact EDM mix that will keep you focused and safe. And If you link your gear to a Facebook, Amazon, or Google account, we can learn from your social and financial history precisely how much you should pay for insurance, and offer a plan through our partners that appears to be cheaper.
The ~~recurring subscription fees~~ opportunities are endless, and if some doomsayers cant see that, well, youre welcome to ride the bus with the poor people.
If our vision excites you and you want to join us shape the future of safety service, feel free to send me a DMwe are growing rapidly and hiring engineers across the board (legal engineers, lobbyist engineers, dark pattern scientists, adtech devs, forward deployed claims engineers, and more!).<|eor|><|sor|>/uj this is a top tier shitpost<|eor|><|sor|>Is it close to becoming a copypasta...?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gx55osh | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Hey guys, Jon here (founder, principal innovation engineer, and YC class of 18).
I dont see what the issue is. If you cant afford it just cram some leet code and get a job at a FAANG.
For those who are already there, let me take this opportunity to clear up some misunderstandings, because PG and the other VCs and I talked a lot about this over the weeks, and we know it may be difficult for some of you to realize the value proposition here.
Look, Im tired of hearing the luddites complain about every innovative, disruptive tech that comes along. This is a revolutionary advancement in safety. Through a sophisticated suite of builtin sensors, and a unique over the air monitoring service, our Safety As A Service offering can track millions of individual data points about your unique driving characteristics, what makes you, *you*. Combined with our advanced AIs, we are able to dynamically adjust your safety profile in real time to make your life safer and more convenient in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago. For example, the breathalyzer can measure your microbrew intake and recommend a nearby coffee shop to stop and pretend to sober up, and by leveraging our large affiliate network, recommend one with an available coupon. We can monitor your route and suggest alternate routes that avoid the homeless. When the active camera detects a nearby el camino or drum circle, the builtin HUD can display nearby dispensaries that have been vetted to only have strains that are guaranteed not to induce an unsafe
body buzz. By monitoring your mood we can suggest the exact EDM mix that will keep you focused and safe. And If you link your gear to a Facebook, Amazon, or Google account, we can learn from your social and financial history precisely how much you should pay for insurance, and offer a plan through our partners that appears to be cheaper.
The ~~recurring subscription fees~~ opportunities are endless, and if some doomsayers cant see that, well, youre welcome to ride the bus with the poor people.
If our vision excites you and you want to join us shape the future of safety service, feel free to send me a DMwe are growing rapidly and hiring engineers across the board (legal engineers, lobbyist engineers, dark pattern scientists, adtech devs, forward deployed claims engineers, and more!).<|eor|><|sor|>I write Haskell, any jobs for me?<|eor|><|sor|>Yes, we are an equal opportunity employer and fully support all provisions of the ADA. Also, our benefits package has excellent mental health coverage.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | dreamin_in_space | gx4osc8 | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>Hey guys, Jon here (founder, principal innovation engineer, and YC class of 18).
I dont see what the issue is. If you cant afford it just cram some leet code and get a job at a FAANG.
For those who are already there, let me take this opportunity to clear up some misunderstandings, because PG and the other VCs and I talked a lot about this over the weeks, and we know it may be difficult for some of you to realize the value proposition here.
Look, Im tired of hearing the luddites complain about every innovative, disruptive tech that comes along. This is a revolutionary advancement in safety. Through a sophisticated suite of builtin sensors, and a unique over the air monitoring service, our Safety As A Service offering can track millions of individual data points about your unique driving characteristics, what makes you, *you*. Combined with our advanced AIs, we are able to dynamically adjust your safety profile in real time to make your life safer and more convenient in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago. For example, the breathalyzer can measure your microbrew intake and recommend a nearby coffee shop to stop and pretend to sober up, and by leveraging our large affiliate network, recommend one with an available coupon. We can monitor your route and suggest alternate routes that avoid the homeless. When the active camera detects a nearby el camino or drum circle, the builtin HUD can display nearby dispensaries that have been vetted to only have strains that are guaranteed not to induce an unsafe
body buzz. By monitoring your mood we can suggest the exact EDM mix that will keep you focused and safe. And If you link your gear to a Facebook, Amazon, or Google account, we can learn from your social and financial history precisely how much you should pay for insurance, and offer a plan through our partners that appears to be cheaper.
The ~~recurring subscription fees~~ opportunities are endless, and if some doomsayers cant see that, well, youre welcome to ride the bus with the poor people.
If our vision excites you and you want to join us shape the future of safety service, feel free to send me a DMwe are growing rapidly and hiring engineers across the board (legal engineers, lobbyist engineers, dark pattern scientists, adtech devs, forward deployed claims engineers, and more!).<|eor|><|sor|>/uj this is a top tier shitpost<|eor|><|sor|>Is it close to becoming a copypasta...?<|eor|><|sor|>It's a bit too specific for a good pasta right now, but I see potential.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | Moarbid_Krabs | gx38rmc | <|sols|><|sot|>This Motorcycle Airbag Vest Will Stop Working If You Miss a Payment<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.vice.com/en/article/93yyyd/this-motorcycle-airbag-vest-will-stop-working-if-you-miss-a-payment<|eol|><|sor|>"Safety as a service".
/uj This is fucking horrifying.<|eor|><|sor|>Service as a safety substitute<|eor|><|sor|>Safety As A Service As A Skill Substitute<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | RealKingChuck | lt7k26 | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 141 |
programmingcirclejerk | desumn | govxwzy | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Function are for weak programmers who need to fragment their code to keep it clean.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 115 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | gowcsln | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>if a language needs features, then it's clearly not a good language because real programmers don't use features<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 78 |
programmingcirclejerk | n3f4s | gowaq44 | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Function are for weak programmers who need to fragment their code to keep it clean.<|eor|><|sor|>If you need programming languages then you're a week programmer already. I know, I know, a tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the programming language learners that they can not get rid of it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 57 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | gow1mln | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>type weenie horseshoe theory: I find static type weenies posting and dynamic type weenies' immediate reaction equally incredibly painful<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | leaningtoweravenger | goydf1j | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>At the end, the CPU knows only about electric current variations, who are we to need more than that?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | sidrkrulz | goyy8vb | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine needing to know what the memory in a register represented. Sad!<|eor|><|sor|>Its all bytes anyways. As a programmer you should already know the type based on the context<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | KindPills | goxmb2x | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>auto response = "u wat m8?";<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | waxroy-finerayfool | goycctl | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>10x programmers simply recall all the program's data structures from memory, who needs a type checker when you have the ol noggin?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | gp0t2vf | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Function are for weak programmers who need to fragment their code to keep it clean.<|eor|><|sor|>Functions are for fools who don't have the discipline to make everything a jump.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | Infernio | goyrz1s | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I was super confused as to what the parent comment's problem was with [the mathematical optimization method](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming) until I realized they meant dynamic *typing*.
/rj Software is too complex because, err, bazaars and cathedrals are both big things so software is big too. And types aren't. Checkmate, type slaves <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | dscottboggs | gozh5sc | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine needing to know what the memory in a register represented. Sad!<|eor|><|sor|>Its all bytes anyways. As a programmer you should already know the type based on the context<|eor|><|sor|>This is how we get code littered with `@param foo int` comments<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | gp02p3e | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>type weenie horseshoe theory: I find static type weenies posting and dynamic type weenies' immediate reaction equally incredibly painful<|eor|><|sor|>Did you try `===`?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | archysailor | goyasw0 | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>> new jersey BSD<|eor|><|sor|>New Jersey is the home of Bell Labs, and the BSDs used to be prime examples of the so-called "cathedral" model for development. "Worse is Better", the famous essay, addresses Unix Philosophy as "the New Jersey school", so this is probably where he got that from.
Still serious jerk material, but this part was fine.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | oldmanwillow21 | goyh8w9 | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Dont do drugs kids.<|eor|><|sor|>Don't do kids drugs.<|eor|><|sor|>Don't do kids' drugs.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | gp02iio | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine needing to know what the memory in a register represented. Sad!<|eor|><|sor|>Its all bytes anyways. As a programmer you should already know the type based on the context<|eor|><|sor|>True programmers know that everything is in binary, that's why RollerCoaster Tycoon was the only good game ever, it was made in assembly which is bare metal and nobody can program it anymore, it's like Damascus Steel
/r/todayididntlearn_triviaisntlearning<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | Clockwork757 | gox7lc6 | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>> new jersey BSD<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | nmarshall23 | goyml5a | <|sols|><|sot|>If you need types then you are a weak programmer already as-is. I know, I know, tons of hackers wanna disagree, but their brain is so enslaved into the type madness that they can not get rid of it.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lszsbj/-/gouvr7y<|eol|><|sor|>Who needs Rust when you could program with Op Codes.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | linus_stallman | i15t0g | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 141 |
programmingcirclejerk | sebamestre | fzv5ovm | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 68 |
programmingcirclejerk | sebamestre | fzvfr5i | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>So maybe it's a JS-only thing, or maybe it's just a delusion, but why would iterating over an array backwards be faster?<|eor|><|sor|>On some ancient architectures, comparing your index with zero takes fewer cycles than comparing against a value in a register.
This is pretty much an assembler-only optimization, and one not very relevant in modern architectures at that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 63 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fzviivl | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>Using too much hand sanitizer can dry out your hands, best to smear dirt on them so you aren't tempted.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | sirgroovy | fzvf0tr | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>So maybe it's a JS-only thing, or maybe it's just a delusion, but why would iterating over an array backwards be faster?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | zygohistomoronism | fzutncc | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>where's the jerk ?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fzvig98 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>So maybe it's a JS-only thing, or maybe it's just a delusion, but why would iterating over an array backwards be faster?<|eor|><|sor|>lol not using the `/` adverb
Post made by #J gang<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | YourGamerMom | fzvih3k | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>So maybe it's a JS-only thing, or maybe it's just a delusion, but why would iterating over an array backwards be faster?<|eor|><|sor|>I'm not sure since my mind hasn't been sullied by JS, but it might be cheaper to use `arr.length` once and do the comparisons with a constant than to calculate the length again for every loop. Of course then if you add items to the list inside the loop you won't iterate over them, but maybe that's a price you'd be willing to pay.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | Beefster09 | fzxl2bg | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>You don't understand. Those 10 cycles *really add up* over several weeks of uptime.
/uj
Performance is hard to grasp because it doesn't always align with intuition. To the surprise of many, it is sometimes faster to redundantly compute what seems like an expensive expression than to branch to avoid the computation. Compilers are also really good at micro-optimizations like iterating over loops efficiently and magically converting divisions into wtf multiplications and bit twiddling. Unfortunately that's just not what makes code slow. Most slowness comes from I/O and bad data layout.
Basically the hiearchy of slowness goes something like this: (biggest impact to smallest)
- External Network
- Internal Network
- Hard Disk Access
- Solid State Writes
- Solid State Reads
- Spawning A Process
- Spawning a Thread
- Loopback Network I/O
- Cache Misses (why you should use arrays instead of linked lists)
- Branch Mispredictions (why interpreted languages are slow)
- Multiply/Divide vs Bit Twiddling (let the compiler do this)
A couple of the early points are probably out of order.
Servers probably only need to focus on cutting out unnecessary I/O. Anything on a client machine should probably focus on avoiding converting data structures all the time.
/rj
Also, Fuck the DOM. Render directly to a canvas if you want things to be fast and you're stuck with Javascript.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | fzxbykg | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>Using too much hand sanitizer can dry out your hands, best to smear dirt on them so you aren't tempted.<|eor|><|sor|>Being around people makes your immune system stronger.
That's why I find people with COVID and have them cough on me during unprotected penetrative sex.
Pretty soon I'll be immune to everything.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | marmakoide | fzvm7yu | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>So maybe it's a JS-only thing, or maybe it's just a delusion, but why would iterating over an array backwards be faster?<|eor|><|sor|>On some CPUs, comparing with zero is faster. It was significant back when pipelines, caches, etc were not really a thing. I think somebody should mention loop unrolling to some JS devs, I'll grab the popcorn.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | sebamestre | fzvmxsl | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>Look at mister Ivory Tower over here, being all elitist !<|eor|><|sor|>Jerks are just ejaculations on the category of irony. What's the problem?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | SuspiciousScript | fzxogzf | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>You don't understand. Those 10 cycles *really add up* over several weeks of uptime.
/uj
Performance is hard to grasp because it doesn't always align with intuition. To the surprise of many, it is sometimes faster to redundantly compute what seems like an expensive expression than to branch to avoid the computation. Compilers are also really good at micro-optimizations like iterating over loops efficiently and magically converting divisions into wtf multiplications and bit twiddling. Unfortunately that's just not what makes code slow. Most slowness comes from I/O and bad data layout.
Basically the hiearchy of slowness goes something like this: (biggest impact to smallest)
- External Network
- Internal Network
- Hard Disk Access
- Solid State Writes
- Solid State Reads
- Spawning A Process
- Spawning a Thread
- Loopback Network I/O
- Cache Misses (why you should use arrays instead of linked lists)
- Branch Mispredictions (why interpreted languages are slow)
- Multiply/Divide vs Bit Twiddling (let the compiler do this)
A couple of the early points are probably out of order.
Servers probably only need to focus on cutting out unnecessary I/O. Anything on a client machine should probably focus on avoiding converting data structures all the time.
/rj
Also, Fuck the DOM. Render directly to a canvas if you want things to be fast and you're stuck with Javascript.<|eor|><|sor|>>why you should use arrays instead of linked lists
This is only if you don't anticipate appending elements, right? Like if you need to request more heap space that is going to be slower than a lot of cache misses, right?<|eor|><|sor|>`PROCEDURE UNJERK.`
Linked lists have very few good uses. In this case you'd be much better off using whatever language _x_'s version of an `ArrayList` is; i.e., an array that automatically doubles in size when you fill it to the brim. Any decent language will let you pre-allocate a certain size to avoid unnecessary `realloc`s, too.
`STOP RUN.`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | mwassler | fzxth3d | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>I don't get it. If you've already written your code in rust what more optimizations could you even do?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | fzx00rz | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>where's the jerk ?<|eor|><|sor|>SBCL is fast f**ck ..<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
Well SBCL actually has static type checking. I don't know about CCL or ECL, but I know SBCL does.
And you can also specify types with `declaim`/`declare` with `type` and `ftype`, it just ends up as ugly. `deftype` can help a little but it can still get ugly.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | dreamwavedev | fzvwf35 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Plus, working in a dynamically typed language heavily discourages premature optimization because you already threw performance out the window." (2013)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6343905<|eol|><|sor|>This is no jerk, but also not true. I have heard js people say that
for(let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; --i)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
Is waaaaay more efficient than
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
extremely_expensive_function(arr[i]);
And then proceed to only iterate backwards in their code that does thousands of string splitting operations on strings that were previously split with a different separator
People just don't understand performance<|eor|><|sor|>So maybe it's a JS-only thing, or maybe it's just a delusion, but why would iterating over an array backwards be faster?<|eor|><|sor|>On some ancient architectures, comparing your index with zero takes fewer cycles than comparing against a value in a register.
This is pretty much an assembler-only optimization, and one not very relevant in modern architectures at that.<|eor|><|sor|>Seems like a trivial optimization to perform automatically on archs that would benefit from it when you already have that info for attempting vectorization/unrolling anyway...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | ptitz | hg7ig6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 141 |
programmingcirclejerk | NakeyDooCrew | fw2kkf4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>I'm glad somebody had the balls to stand up and say what everybody was saying.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 145 |
programmingcirclejerk | 28f272fe556a1363cc31 | fw2xwkq | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>That face when you realize you've conflated OOP with inheritance.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 86 |
programmingcirclejerk | Waghlon | fw2m6p1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>"Maybe I convince people OOP is bad, employers won't care that I'm shit at it"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 72 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | fw34ffo | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>That face when you realize you've conflated OOP with inheritance.<|eor|><|sor|>A _real_ programmer would conflate OOP with slow message-passing and green threads for every pointer<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 59 |
programmingcirclejerk | disintegore | fw2fgzp | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?<|eor|><|sor|>maybe this : "I had no problems with this thing in the decades that I used it until it became unfashionable"
still a good and correct post though<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 56 |
programmingcirclejerk | Testiclese | fw3071y | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>Serious opinion: I'm not sure I really understand the usefulness of inheritance (yet?)<|eor|><|sor|>Since when is usefulness a good metric? If it were, Commander Pike wouldve allowed Go to have generics. Instead, he saw the value of good old fashioned manual labor - nothing like digging your own ditch on a hot summer day to make you appreciate a real tough-as-nails blue-collar lifestyle. Its how real men are forged.
Furthermore, Orange Crab has deemed inheritance immoral and forbade it from Rust.
Basically inheritance is immoral bourgeois decadence that has no place in todays society.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 52 |
programmingcirclejerk | iEliteTester | fw401oc | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>I'm glad somebody had the balls to stand up and say what everybody was saying.<|eor|><|sor|>Just because you use OOP doesn't mean you're designing it well. There's a reason code smells and design patterns exist. It's not easy, and it's not something you can just intuitively get right. The author of this article is clearly overusing inheritance, and has never heard the term "cohesive".<|eor|><|sor|>The author has also not heard of the following words:
* Moral
* Fearless
* Concurrency
In that order.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | usernameqwerty003 | fw3nlep | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>Computer science is to science what alchemy is to chemistry.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | internet_user1013 | fw3sd75 | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>I'm glad somebody had the balls to stand up and say what everybody was saying.<|eor|><|sor|>Just because you use OOP doesn't mean you're designing it well. There's a reason code smells and design patterns exist. It's not easy, and it's not something you can just intuitively get right. The author of this article is clearly overusing inheritance, and has never heard the term "cohesive".<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | BufferUnderpants | fw2y3mr | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>"Maybe I convince people OOP is bad, employers won't care that I'm shit at it"<|eor|><|sor|>We're all sinners when practicing OOP. Where can I find an OOP church and confess to a priest?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | SuspiciousScript | fw27a4m | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | fw3xqwe | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>This guy is just following the hype train. Has no clue why anything is anything.<|eor|><|sor|>we should make a subreddit for posts like that<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | usernameqwerty003 | fw44xug | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>Computer science is to science what alchemy is to chemistry.<|eor|><|sor|>Computer science predated and gave rise to science? What?<|eor|><|sor|>You heard me.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | a_rather_small_moose | fw3ov0j | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>Serious opinion: I'm not sure I really understand the usefulness of inheritance (yet?)<|eor|><|sor|>It adds complexity Im payed by the hour to fix.
<uj>
It adds complexity Im payed by the hour to fix.
</uj><|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | themagicalcake | fw3ogsd | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>Once he said functional programming I clapped<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | Karyo_Ten | fw2wal8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Goodbye, Object Oriented Programming<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53<|eol|><|sor|>I have never used OOP and never missed it.
But I'll gladly take your Gorilla, Jungle and Banana, we don't have that in my country.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | brennennen | g8u09r | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 142 |
programmingcirclejerk | somewhataccurate | fopsuli | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>wow what an unpopular and brave take
ill bring it up when my boss asks about why
decorator.type<uiwidget.widget::normal_wiwidget>(widget_tag::no_input(), widget_tag::void_widget())->open_widget()
doesnt include an object for the result<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 84 |
programmingcirclejerk | tgf63 | foqc9qx | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>>Sorry to burst your stereotype, but I flunked out of college
Well this all makes sense now<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 55 |
programmingcirclejerk | synchronium | foqyb3b | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>The remaining 0.001% is that codebase of ancient legend involving an Animal base class inherited by Dog and Cat child classes.
The coders of the new world have similar myths about a Vehicle class begetting a Car and a Bus class.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | Karyo_Ten | foq7e5v | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>And the other 0.001% is written in C, Cobol and Javascript?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | pcopley | foqcs3e | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>wow what an unpopular and brave take
ill bring it up when my boss asks about why
decorator.type<uiwidget.widget::normal_wiwidget>(widget_tag::no_input(), widget_tag::void_widget())->open_widget()
doesnt include an object for the result<|eor|><|sor|>It's a shame this is too long to be added to the flairs<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | disintegore | foqf3o1 | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk he's right<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>it all started with the original sin, the release of the 8088<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | iFarmGolems | foq5l84 | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk he's right<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | foqfk3u | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>wow what an unpopular and brave take
ill bring it up when my boss asks about why
decorator.type<uiwidget.widget::normal_wiwidget>(widget_tag::no_input(), widget_tag::void_widget())->open_widget()
doesnt include an object for the result<|eor|><|sor|>It's a shame this is too long to be added to the flairs<|eor|><|sor|>`Since C++23` part he forgot, that will do<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | Willuminatus | for58cf | <|sols|><|sot|>"The observation that OOP is a mistake is an easy one. 99.999% of software is written based on this mistake."<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/g72ysr/things_i_wished_more_developers_knew_about/fohq0h6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x<|eol|><|sor|>The remaining 0.001% is that codebase of ancient legend involving an Animal base class inherited by Dog and Cat child classes.
The coders of the new world have similar myths about a Vehicle class begetting a Car and a Bus class.<|eor|><|sor|>Experts are still trying to determine if the circle class is also a shape class<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.