subreddit
stringclasses
7 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
id
stringlengths
5
7
content
stringlengths
67
30.4k
score
int64
0
140k
programmingcirclejerk
YM_Industries
jgthk0h
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>> You know how we cover "being harsh" in the professional world? > 1. Go to the bookmarked Google Docs rejection letter; > 2. Copy; > 3. Paste; > 4. Change the name to that of the applicant; > 5. Send. Yawn, this is considered harsh these days? You know how we cover "being harsh" in the unprofessional (read: FOSS) world? 1. [Mauro, SHUT THE FUCK UP!](https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/23/75) 2. Fix your f*cking "compliance tool" 3. Send<|eor|><|sor|>Who is this Linus guy? I like the cut of his jib.<|eor|><|sor|>He's a programming personality best known for his [entertaining roasts](/r/LinusRants). I don't think Linus is his real name (it doesn't sound like a real name at least), I think he just uses it online to piggyback off the success of LTT.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
31
programmingcirclejerk
JayCroghan
jgt6moz
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>> You know how we cover "being harsh" in the professional world? > 1. Go to the bookmarked Google Docs rejection letter; > 2. Copy; > 3. Paste; > 4. Change the name to that of the applicant; > 5. Send. Yawn, this is considered harsh these days? You know how we cover "being harsh" in the unprofessional (read: FOSS) world? 1. [Mauro, SHUT THE FUCK UP!](https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/23/75) 2. Fix your f*cking "compliance tool" 3. Send<|eor|><|sor|>Who is this Linus guy? I like the cut of his jib.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
26
programmingcirclejerk
sowelijanpona
jgu5y92
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>> w3c validator is mostly irrelevant. working in the sf / bay area for 7 years<|eor|><|sor|>standards considered harmful<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
25
programmingcirclejerk
Forward-Error-9449
jgu9mom
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>> I'm Dutch, it's in my culture to be more direct and I held back That my friend is a naturalised Dutchie or somebody with a Dutch grandfather, not a native.<|eor|><|sor|>Wtf happened that no native Dutch have native grandfathers?!<|eor|><|sor|>They all learned Rust. The population of grandcatgirls is through the roof though<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
24
programmingcirclejerk
mobotsar
jgs16ex
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>WTF is a w3c? (Please don't tell me I don't want to know.)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
cheater00
jgtsnxu
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>> I'm Dutch, it's in my culture to be more direct and I held back That my friend is a naturalised Dutchie or somebody with a Dutch grandfather, not a native.<|eor|><|sor|>> I'm Dutch, it's in my culture to be more direct and I held back i've heard this kind of bullshit before from Dutch people specifically, it's like someone said that in a bad TV soap at some point and all the douchebags integrated it into their core being.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
tomwhoiscontrary
jgs0cw5
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>They hated mahade because he told them the truth.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
21
programmingcirclejerk
aikii
jgt2n9q
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>10/10 would watch a reality show where this guy is interviewing candidates<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
21
programmingcirclejerk
HINDBRAIN
jgt6yar
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>If your react todo example app isn't xhtml, wcag, section 508 and gdrp-compliant, what are you even doing with your life?<|eor|><|sor|>Generating a xhtml page for a pdf renderer: "NOOO WHERE IS THE BOILERPLATE HAVE A PISSINGANDSHITTINGEXCEPTION".<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
18
programmingcirclejerk
brotatowolf
jgs4bjj
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>> webshit<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
16
programmingcirclejerk
JayCroghan
jgt67gp
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Right hand still jerkin while I type but lol! 50! Those are rookie numbers. Visual Studio says I have 10k+ warnings in our enterprise project. Can I get a nice?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
15
programmingcirclejerk
loopsdeer
jgtgm17
<|sols|><|sot|>Every single fucking time, "nice" Redditors reply: "Looks good!", "Amazing!", "Good Job!". When there are 50+ W3C validation errors<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/12pk6ew/comment/jgo2j66/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3<|eol|><|sor|>> I'm Dutch, it's in my culture to be more direct and I held back That my friend is a naturalised Dutchie or somebody with a Dutch grandfather, not a native.<|eor|><|sor|>Wtf happened that no native Dutch have native grandfathers?!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
15
programmingcirclejerk
starlevel01
xusey3
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
139
programmingcirclejerk
irqlnotdispatchlevel
iqxcrlq
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting V jerk.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
111
programmingcirclejerk
ubernostrum
iqxgx00
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>> Just this once, we would use the line for changing semantics instead of for adding a feature or removing a feature. Within five years the line is going to be "go 1.23/Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/104.0.5112.79 Safari/537.36"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
70
programmingcirclejerk
senj
iqxmso0
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>> That is, this code has a bug. After this loop executes, all contains len(items) identical pointers, each pointing at the same Item, holding the last value iterated over. This happens because the item variable is per-loop, not per-iteration: &item is the same on every iteration, and item is overwritten on each iteration insane that people take this shitlang seriously<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
69
programmingcirclejerk
tamasfe
iqx89ys
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>And the wrongly inserted item can be simply deleted with `all = all[:i+copy(all[i:], all[i+1:])]`, I don't see the problem.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
66
programmingcirclejerk
Kamoda
iqxlqwc
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting V jerk.<|eor|><|sor|>A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
30
programmingcirclejerk
cabbagebot
iqy4j95
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>We can't expect college graduates to understand for loop variables.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
30
programmingcirclejerk
MCRusher
iqxiwu4
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>wow, yet another reason to never use go. It keeps getting better<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
29
programmingcirclejerk
tamasfe
iqxbqam
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>~~Iterators~~ slices when iterated over could emit either ~~references~~ pointers or copied values, and have the variables that are ~~moved into~~ captured by closures have an associated lifeti... ah fuck it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
25
programmingcirclejerk
MorrowM_
iqz2uf2
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I don't know Go, but surely having item be the same on every iteration of the loop kills the entire purpose of a loop? Is this an issue with the loop? Or an issue with the address? Where the code goes and changes every single value of that list every time? I fail to see what's going on...<|eor|><|sor|>I think the variable is the same variable throughout the loop, but with every iteration the value it stores is different.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
20
programmingcirclejerk
pauseless
iqz3khi
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I don't know Go, but surely having item be the same on every iteration of the loop kills the entire purpose of a loop? Is this an issue with the loop? Or an issue with the address? Where the code goes and changes every single value of that list every time? I fail to see what's going on...<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Basically for loops written like for _, x := range xs { behave more or less as if youve written x := 0 for _, x = range xs { so its just updating the same x variable in memory each iteration. Capture a reference to that in the loop and boom. This change creates a new x each time around and is more like for i := range xs { x := xs[i]<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
12
programmingcirclejerk
ugherm_
iqyx95d
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I don't know Go, but surely having item be the same on every iteration of the loop kills the entire purpose of a loop? Is this an issue with the loop? Or an issue with the address? Where the code goes and changes every single value of that list every time? I fail to see what's going on...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
another_day_passes
iqzprge
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>> Just this once, we would use the line for changing semantics instead of for adding a feature or removing a feature. Within five years the line is going to be "go 1.23/Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/104.0.5112.79 Safari/537.36"<|eor|><|sor|>GNU/Linux/systemd/wayland/pipewire<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
never_inline
ir6s8g1
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>> That is, this code has a bug. After this loop executes, all contains len(items) identical pointers, each pointing at the same Item, holding the last value iterated over. This happens because the item variable is per-loop, not per-iteration: &item is the same on every iteration, and item is overwritten on each iteration insane that people take this shitlang seriously<|eor|><|sor|>It makes sense to me because I already know compiler authors put minimum effort.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
7
programmingcirclejerk
alecStewart1
ir1u516
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>> Just this once, we would use the line for changing semantics instead of for adding a feature or removing a feature. Within five years the line is going to be "go 1.23/Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/104.0.5112.79 Safari/537.36"<|eor|><|sor|>GNU/Linux/systemd/wayland/pipewire<|eor|><|sor|>> GNU/Linux/s6/seatd/zsh/wayland/hyprland/eww/pipewire/wireplumber There, more ~~sweaty~~ based.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
7
programmingcirclejerk
ugherm_
iqz7cme
<|sols|><|sot|>Again the fix is the same: add v := v.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56010<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I don't know Go, but surely having item be the same on every iteration of the loop kills the entire purpose of a loop? Is this an issue with the loop? Or an issue with the address? Where the code goes and changes every single value of that list every time? I fail to see what's going on...<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Basically for loops written like for _, x := range xs { behave more or less as if youve written x := 0 for _, x = range xs { so its just updating the same x variable in memory each iteration. Capture a reference to that in the loop and boom. This change creates a new x each time around and is more like for i := range xs { x := xs[i]<|eor|><|sor|>Interesting choice of semantics for sure.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
5
programmingcirclejerk
illustrious_trees
w1n1xl
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
142
programmingcirclejerk
mrpimpunicorn
iglcncv
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>If ssh was so good they'd have invented it first.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
99
programmingcirclejerk
exploooooosions
iglk9vq
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>If ssh was so good they'd have invented it first.<|eor|><|sor|>I'm sure we'd have ssh2 by now if it really was that successful.<|eor|><|sor|>Plus ssh uses port 22 and telnet is 23. Telnet has one more port.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
81
programmingcirclejerk
tamasfe
igler3t
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>If ssh was so good they'd have invented it first.<|eor|><|sor|>I'm sure we'd have ssh2 by now if it really was that successful.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
64
programmingcirclejerk
Weak-Opening8154
igleo15
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>I'm selling systems without ram. We don't need latency caused by ram above the L3<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
59
programmingcirclejerk
SickMoonDoe
iglanrk
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>If you're scared go to church. Rest of us out here telephoning our homies on the net RAW!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
45
programmingcirclejerk
djavaisadog
iglmw33
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>I'm selling systems without ram. We don't need latency caused by ram above the L3<|eor|><|sor|>And really, even L3 is a stretch. Might as well avoid that multi-stage caching garbage slowing us down.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
30
programmingcirclejerk
1LargeAdult
igludke
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>I'm selling systems without ram. We don't need latency caused by ram above the L3<|eor|><|sor|>And really, even L3 is a stretch. Might as well avoid that multi-stage caching garbage slowing us down.<|eor|><|sor|>6502 register gang<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
20
programmingcirclejerk
senj
igluqgm
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>jokes on you guys I built the same thing in gopher<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
17
programmingcirclejerk
Zambito1
ignecfw
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>jokes on you guys I built the same thing in gopher<|eor|><|sor|>actually im a gemini <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
14
programmingcirclejerk
magi093
igogmhh
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>I'm selling systems without ram. We don't need latency caused by ram above the L3<|eor|><|sor|>this is unironically what high frequency trading people are like<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
Boz0r
igo2xr2
<|sols|><|sot|>Not to scare you, but Im building the same thing in telnet rather than ssh. It wont be slowed down by all that encryption and secured authentication.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32133173<|eol|><|sor|>If ssh was so good they'd have invented it first.<|eor|><|sor|>I'm sure we'd have ssh2 by now if it really was that successful.<|eor|><|sor|>Plus ssh uses port 22 and telnet is 23. Telnet has one more port.<|eor|><|sor|>This one goes to 23<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
6
programmingcirclejerk
NiceTerm
uy4vu0
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
138
programmingcirclejerk
NeverComments
ia2kbl7
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Using goncurrency with goroutines lets the go runtime gompute your gode faster than any legacy programming language. Its a new era of gogramming.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
135
programmingcirclejerk
NeverComments
ia2xpzh
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Using goncurrency with goroutines lets the go runtime gompute your gode faster than any legacy programming language. Its a new era of gogramming.<|eor|><|sor|>Tully, after gonerics, all it needs is goceptions and the cycle will be complete.<|eor|><|sor|>Dare I dream of gonads?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
84
programmingcirclejerk
half_stack_developer
ia21drl
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Similar ? Nah. I'm pretty sure it's faster than the computer it's running on. Just download some additional ram and you are set to Go.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
77
programmingcirclejerk
tripledjr
ia2ntxg
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Personally I like to get really low level to really squeeze out every last bit of performance that's why I stick to languages like Python and visual programming.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
74
programmingcirclejerk
closer_now
ia2l47h
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>I just want to take a moment to say how disgusting the GO mascot is. It makes me want to vomit.<|eor|><|sor|>he cute<|eor|><|sor|>non-anime girl mascot, language invalid<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
61
programmingcirclejerk
Orgox
ia2uez7
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Using goncurrency with goroutines lets the go runtime gompute your gode faster than any legacy programming language. Its a new era of gogramming.<|eor|><|sor|>Tully, after gonerics, all it needs is goceptions and the cycle will be complete.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
58
programmingcirclejerk
KaranasToll
ia2adhc
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>I just want to take a moment to say how disgusting the GO mascot is. It makes me want to vomit.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
48
programmingcirclejerk
Snail_Lad
ia2b0t8
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>I just want to take a moment to say how disgusting the GO mascot is. It makes me want to vomit.<|eor|><|sor|>he cute<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
40
programmingcirclejerk
feral_brick
ia34e4a
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Lol half the code snippets are error handling<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
39
programmingcirclejerk
lindgrenj6
ia2j5oc
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>When you're a turtle, anything thats faster than a turtle is "extremely fast". Thats why I always use the slowest language possible, so I can stronghand management into letting me do a rewrite in **GO** (tm)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
37
programmingcirclejerk
tomwhoiscontrary
ia2bmoi
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>lol generics<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
37
programmingcirclejerk
dangerbird2
ia55q7u
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Using goncurrency with goroutines lets the go runtime gompute your gode faster than any legacy programming language. Its a new era of gogramming.<|eor|><|sor|>Tully, after gonerics, all it needs is goceptions and the cycle will be complete.<|eor|><|sor|>Dare I dream of gonads?<|eor|><|sor|>A gonad is just a gonoid in the category of endogunctors<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
36
programmingcirclejerk
stone_henge
ia3mdnq
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>> to that of Java or C++ Incorrect comparison as theyre in different performance leagues. Java was proven to be faster than C, and C is faster than C++, so. Miles away.<|eor|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|sor|>java is faster because minecraft is written in java<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
31
programmingcirclejerk
never_inline
ia2yf34
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Tell me you're a webshit without telling me you're a webshit.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
30
programmingcirclejerk
DietOk3559
ia37sbv
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>I just want to take a moment to say how disgusting the GO mascot is. It makes me want to vomit.<|eor|><|sor|>Error handling and some other pitfalls are irritating but yeah I agree mascot is the worst thing about Go.<|eor|><|sor|>The mascot is actually the only thing I like about Go. It vibes perfectly with its userbase, which is what a mascot must do. If you want a better mascot than that, you'll have to pick a better language (like LISP).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
29
programmingcirclejerk
Mackie5Million
ia2ba3a
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>> to that of Java or C++ Incorrect comparison as theyre in different performance leagues. Java was proven to be faster than C, and C is faster than C++, so. Miles away.<|eor|><|sor|>That's why this post is on /r/programmingcirclejerk.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
27
programmingcirclejerk
UnheardIdentity
ia5aqec
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Personally I like to get really low level to really squeeze out every last bit of performance that's why I stick to languages like Python and visual programming.<|eor|><|sor|>Lego mindstorm is peak programming.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
buckeyebrad24
ia3k8nt
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>Using goncurrency with goroutines lets the go runtime gompute your gode faster than any legacy programming language. Its a new era of gogramming.<|eor|><|sor|>Tully, after gonerics, all it needs is goceptions and the cycle will be complete.<|eor|><|sor|>Dare I dream of gonads?<|eor|><|sor|>No. They're Gone. Reduced to atoms<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
21
programmingcirclejerk
HeavyDutyCockInhaler
ia3lcex
<|sols|><|sot|>Go is fast! Go is extremely fast. The performance is similar to that of Java or C++.<|eot|><|sol|>https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/03/03/why-we-switched-from-python-to-go/<|eol|><|sor|>C++ is always fast, that's why it, and C, are the benchmark to beat. And sure, Go is close to C++ in many cases, but it's also significantly slower in others. "Go is typically 40 times faster than Python." Everything on the planet including my grandmother in a wheelchair is faster than Python. In summary: Go will never be a 10x language you dirty 1x gophers<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
18
programmingcirclejerk
AccurateCandidate
qg5jvx
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
142
programmingcirclejerk
RustEvangelist10xer
hi3zvl2
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>Words can't describe how poorly you come across here. >Your comment comes off as elitist and patronizing, for what it's worth. >jeez, you need to relax. That was a normal question, no need to behave yourself like that. You know you've surpassed the 10xer status when HN Superstars start asking you to calm down because they can't handle the bombs you're dropping.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
117
programmingcirclejerk
muntaxitome
hi5559l
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>Why don't the Rust guys just write their own Kernel? Also, didn't some woman on the Rust project just got killed by Alec Baldwin? Doesn't sound like a very secure project if you ask me.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
72
programmingcirclejerk
isthistechsupport
hi4cj8b
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>I couldn't care less about what non-kernel-developers think about this issue, but "since you mention this": please do mind your own business. Their horse is so high I don't think they're getting much oxygen up there<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
46
programmingcirclejerk
Flesh_Bike
hi5jeyh
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>Why don't the Rust guys just write their own Kernel? Also, didn't some woman on the Rust project just got killed by Alec Baldwin? Doesn't sound like a very secure project if you ask me.<|eor|><|sor|>well the gun was put in an unsafe block<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
44
programmingcirclejerk
isthistechsupport
hi48tua
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>Words can't describe how poorly you come across here. >Your comment comes off as elitist and patronizing, for what it's worth. >jeez, you need to relax. That was a normal question, no need to behave yourself like that. You know you've surpassed the 10xer status when HN Superstars start asking you to calm down because they can't handle the bombs you're dropping.<|eor|><|sor|>Linux kernel devs confirmed to be 10000000000000xers<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
42
programmingcirclejerk
Karyo_Ten
hi49h63
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>Words can't describe how poorly you come across here. >Your comment comes off as elitist and patronizing, for what it's worth. >jeez, you need to relax. That was a normal question, no need to behave yourself like that. You know you've surpassed the 10xer status when HN Superstars start asking you to calm down because they can't handle the bombs you're dropping.<|eor|><|sor|>Linux kernel devs confirmed to be 10000000000000xers<|eor|><|sor|>So much for Rust preventing buffer overflows.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
39
programmingcirclejerk
duckbill_principate
hi46b9s
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>geez got my entire recommended daily serving of pretentiousness and I havent even had breakfast yet. i guess Ill have to skip the soylent today, thanks a lot <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
38
programmingcirclejerk
ECUIYCAMOICIQMQACKKE
hi4rp6c
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>As a Linux kernel developer, I feel like non-kernel developers like yourself telling me which language I should use is definetly overstepping a boundary. >I couldn't care less about what non-kernel-developers think about this issue, but "since you mention this": please do mind your own business. based /uj fucking based<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
36
programmingcirclejerk
camelCaseIsWebScale
hi4bt3b
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>> my code, my body, my rules Not your project, not your second seat in public transport, fuck off<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
28
programmingcirclejerk
nuggins
hi4veqa
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>Words can't describe how poorly you come across here. >Your comment comes off as elitist and patronizing, for what it's worth. >jeez, you need to relax. That was a normal question, no need to behave yourself like that. You know you've surpassed the 10xer status when HN Superstars start asking you to calm down because they can't handle the bombs you're dropping.<|eor|><|sor|>Linux kernel devs confirmed to be 10000000000000xers<|eor|><|sor|>So much for Rust preventing buffer overflows.<|eor|><|sor|>> 2021 > using less than 64 bits to store how much better you are than the average dev<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
28
programmingcirclejerk
ProgVal
hi566g9
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>I couldn't care less about what non-kernel-developers think about this issue, but "since you mention this": please do mind your own business. Their horse is so high I don't think they're getting much oxygen up there<|eor|><|sor|>lol no oxidation<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
26
programmingcirclejerk
THICC_DICC_PRICC
hi6wheb
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>This is one of those dudes that writes some shitty WiFi card driver for a random company thats mostly copy pasted off another driver and calls himself a linux kernel maintainer as if hes making high level decisions about it<|eor|><|sor|>Do you have a link to the shitty drivers he's written?<|eor|><|sor|>Do you have a link to my peer reviewed paper that says my source has a link to the evidence?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
24
programmingcirclejerk
onthefence928
hi57mk4
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>> I couldn't care less about what non-kernel-developers think about this issue this has flair potential, how do i claim it? lol<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
THICC_DICC_PRICC
hi5i9j4
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>This is one of those dudes that writes some shitty WiFi card driver for a random company thats mostly copy pasted off another driver and calls himself a linux kernel maintainer as if hes making high level decisions about it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
duckbill_principate
hi5k8j7
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>As a Linux kernel developer, I feel like non-kernel developers like yourself telling me which language I should use is definetly overstepping a boundary. >I couldn't care less about what non-kernel-developers think about this issue, but "since you mention this": please do mind your own business. based /uj fucking based<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>yeah, it sounds like they rewrote some piece of the kernel in rust and their pull request was denied<|eor|><|sor|>The pull request: /* TODO: rewrite this function in Rust. */<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
camelCaseIsWebScale
hi4ygvo
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>> > GC garbage collection in a different "managed" language. The tradeoff is higher RAM footprint, extra cpu and GC pauses for tracing scanners > It would hardly mean a problem for most programs, including OS kernels, especially that kernels are themselves GCs for resources like processes, file handlers, etc. > Also, GC pauses are overblown, most of the tasks can be done in parallel.<|eor|><|sor|>OS is overrated. Most of programs can be run on different computers.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
21
programmingcirclejerk
NiceTerm
hi8bj0i
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>Why don't the Rust guys just write their own Kernel? Also, didn't some woman on the Rust project just got killed by Alec Baldwin? Doesn't sound like a very secure project if you ask me.<|eor|><|sor|>Ahhh there it is, was waiting for this joke. Too soon? Too late Id say.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
16
programmingcirclejerk
amazing_rando
hi5aqk1
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>>As a Linux kernel developer, I feel like non-kernel developers like yourself telling me which language I should use is definetly overstepping a boundary. >I couldn't care less about what non-kernel-developers think about this issue, but "since you mention this": please do mind your own business. based /uj fucking based<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>yeah, it sounds like they rewrote some piece of the kernel in rust and their pull request was denied<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
15
programmingcirclejerk
e-dt
hi5k6hr
<|sols|><|sot|>It really is that simple. My code, my body, my rules.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28999300<|eol|><|sor|>This code is my body. Run this in remembrance of me.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
14
programmingcirclejerk
Hexafluoride74
otbc6e
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
137
programmingcirclejerk
csb06
h6ucmzr
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Checkmate https://apps.apple.com/us/app/turing-machine-simulator/id303032123 /uj Say you dont know what Turing complete means in one post speedrun challenge Edit: It turns out this guy is pretty accomplished; he is a co-creator of the recent JPEG XL standard and apparently has a doctorate in CS. I guess everyone has their own weird hill to die on (or maybe we should be a little concerned about JPEG XL lol).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
92
programmingcirclejerk
Bizzaro_Murphy
h6unk45
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Wait until they find out that having infinite memory is a requirement to be Turing complete and thus their precious arch machines arent Turing complete either.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
68
programmingcirclejerk
republitard_2
h6vyikg
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Checkmate https://apps.apple.com/us/app/turing-machine-simulator/id303032123 /uj Say you dont know what Turing complete means in one post speedrun challenge Edit: It turns out this guy is pretty accomplished; he is a co-creator of the recent JPEG XL standard and apparently has a doctorate in CS. I guess everyone has their own weird hill to die on (or maybe we should be a little concerned about JPEG XL lol).<|eor|><|sor|>Turing completeness means it runs Python 2 code directly. The more directly it runs Python 2, the more Turing completenesser it is.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
48
programmingcirclejerk
categorical-girl
h6w9n7d
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>I wasn't aware app loading/installation was a concern with being Turing complete. TIL.<|eor|><|sor|>> Turing completeness requires full access to the underlying hardware, such as the microphone and accelerometer. - Alain Turning, 1897<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
36
programmingcirclejerk
LazyRefenestrator
h6uefvi
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>I wasn't aware app loading/installation was a concern with being Turing complete. TIL.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
26
programmingcirclejerk
onthefence928
h6v6vpu
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Wait until they find out that having infinite memory is a requirement to be Turing complete and thus their precious arch machines arent Turing complete either.<|eor|><|sor|>duh, when you get close to the end of your available memory, just download more RAM<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
25
programmingcirclejerk
hugolive
h6xe8x5
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Wait until they find out that having infinite memory is a requirement to be Turing complete and thus their precious arch machines arent Turing complete either.<|eor|><|sor|>Memory just wraps around, so as long as you don't look back you can act like you have infinite memory.<|eor|><|sor|>This has also been my experience with alcoholism.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
24
programmingcirclejerk
r2d2_21
h6wkq3q
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Checkmate https://apps.apple.com/us/app/turing-machine-simulator/id303032123 /uj Say you dont know what Turing complete means in one post speedrun challenge Edit: It turns out this guy is pretty accomplished; he is a co-creator of the recent JPEG XL standard and apparently has a doctorate in CS. I guess everyone has their own weird hill to die on (or maybe we should be a little concerned about JPEG XL lol).<|eor|><|sor|>OK, but consider this: You need to install a Turing machine **simulator** on iOS because iOS is not Turing complete itself. Checkmate, atheists!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
muntaxitome
h6uj0ro
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>If it doesn't come with an infinite tape, is it really Turing complete?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
22
programmingcirclejerk
republitard_2
h6vyv53
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>I wasn't aware app loading/installation was a concern with being Turing complete. TIL.<|eor|><|sor|>If there's a padlock preventing you from putting the tape in, is it really a Turing machine?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
20
programmingcirclejerk
irqlnotdispatchlevel
h6vot79
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Wait until they find out that having infinite memory is a requirement to be Turing complete and thus their precious arch machines arent Turing complete either.<|eor|><|sor|>Memory just wraps around, so as long as you don't look back you can act like you have infinite memory.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
17
programmingcirclejerk
PatrickLechat
h6v8ec6
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>"Learn How to Jerk the Hard Way" - a modern classic<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
14
programmingcirclejerk
jess-sch
h6uyb2j
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>I was with him until that last part. How the fuck can you fuck up a comment this hard<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
hugolive
h6xe742
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>Checkmate https://apps.apple.com/us/app/turing-machine-simulator/id303032123 /uj Say you dont know what Turing complete means in one post speedrun challenge Edit: It turns out this guy is pretty accomplished; he is a co-creator of the recent JPEG XL standard and apparently has a doctorate in CS. I guess everyone has their own weird hill to die on (or maybe we should be a little concerned about JPEG XL lol).<|eor|><|sor|>OK, but consider this: You need to install a Turing machine **simulator** on iOS because iOS is not Turing complete itself. Checkmate, atheists!<|eor|><|sor|>So then how come I installed one of those job simulator games but I still only know Haskell?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
moon-chilled
h6wrn1s
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>iOS runs [python3](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pythonista-3/id1085978097), therefor it is not turing complete.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
6
programmingcirclejerk
r2d2_21
h6wktx1
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>You actually want your phone to not be Turing complete, because if it is, it means it can, and will, be turned into a Bitcoin miner without your consent.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
6
programmingcirclejerk
recycle4science
h6vmv2x
<|sols|><|sot|>That makes iOS devices basically the only devices with powerful general-purpose hardware that are not actually Turing complete.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/osj2i8/for_developers_apples_safari_is_crap_and_outdated/h6st21y/<|eol|><|sor|>> No, I am not. I don't see what you think is funny about this. I think it's quite sad, tbh. \*chef's kiss\*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
5
programmingcirclejerk
ProgVal
m74hl8
<|sols|><|sot|>I've run as root whenever possible for over a decade with 0 problems. I'm not going to relegate myself to constantly asking my own computer for permission to do anything.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26493004<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
140
programmingcirclejerk
duckbill_principate
gr9gvrj
<|sols|><|sot|>I've run as root whenever possible for over a decade with 0 problems. I'm not going to relegate myself to constantly asking my own computer for permission to do anything.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26493004<|eol|><|sor|>> the additional pain of all those bandaids proposed here it not worth it. I did crash servers, deleted clusters, botched up firewalls and routing by misclicks. But any damage caused by this does not approach the pain caused by misguided attempts to avoid it. This is the kind of guy who ends up getting a leg amputated because going to a doctor is too hard.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
112