subreddit
stringclasses
7 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
id
stringlengths
5
7
content
stringlengths
67
30.4k
score
int64
0
140k
programmingcirclejerk
lambda-male
rh0kw0
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
130
programmingcirclejerk
closer_now
hono1mn
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>> Identifiers cannot contain emoji 1984<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
113
programmingcirclejerk
ishdx
hono29x
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>This is one of the most important problems in current programming languages, congratulations to rust team for solving it <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
66
programmingcirclejerk
wzdd
honk481
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>Missed opportunity to add as an identifier in the rust compiler plus a special-case exception for the rust compiler in the rust compiler<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
54
programmingcirclejerk
TheGhostOfInky
honz5ag
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>> Identifiers cannot contain emoji 1984<|eor|><|sor|>Another win for C++ [https://imgur.com/IFSKARd](https://imgur.com/IFSKARd)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
54
programmingcirclejerk
RustEvangelist10xer
honppsb
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>While silly languages are busy playing catch-up by implementing basic features in 2021, Rust continues to be moral, safe and environmentally friendly. With the added excitement of friendly error messages like this. What a great day to be a Rustacean!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
47
programmingcirclejerk
corona-info
honf9cr
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>Plaudits to all involved for keeping compiler error messages so friendly. Truly, what a great community.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
32
programmingcirclejerk
KaranasToll
honimr3
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine not having Unicode identifiers<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
25
programmingcirclejerk
GOPHERS_GONE_WILD
hopcp26
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>RESUME: CONTRIBUTED TO RUST COMPILER.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
19
programmingcirclejerk
camelCaseIsWebScale
honhu1l
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>I have achieved komedy.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
18
programmingcirclejerk
RefrigeratorCute5952
hoo7clc
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>coding with emojis is the type of utopia i want to be apart of<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
crowbarous
hooel0k
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>coding with emojis is the type of utopia i want to be apart of<|eor|><|sor|>This but leave it to ambiguity whether there's a space in "apart"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
8
programmingcirclejerk
tfehring
honzq0x
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|> rustc is powerless against emoji <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
7
programmingcirclejerk
lambda-male
horstki
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|soopr|>update: [this patch has a bug](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476#issuecomment-995712151)<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
7
programmingcirclejerk
coolreader18
hoqq5vl
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>Missed opportunity to add as an identifier in the rust compiler plus a special-case exception for the rust compiler in the rust compiler<|eor|><|sor|>Try `fn main() { break rust; }`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
6
programmingcirclejerk
diegovsky_pvp
hop3t1z
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>coding with emojis is the type of utopia i want to be apart of<|eor|><|sor|>APL but millennial<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
6
programmingcirclejerk
watcher202010
hoqt9kn
<|sols|><|sot|>Improve 'cannot contain emoji' error.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91476<|eol|><|sor|>While silly languages are busy playing catch-up by implementing basic features in 2021, Rust continues to be moral, safe and environmentally friendly. With the added excitement of friendly error messages like this. What a great day to be a Rustacean!<|eor|><|sor|>Where is our "security expert"? Need to hear about implementing languages yourself.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
5
programmingcirclejerk
Fearless_Process
q46vzn
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
134
programmingcirclejerk
scratchisthebest
hfyep17
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>> The standard library's LinkedList isn't the best example tbh, since it doesn't currently support the ability to do things like inserting or removing individual elements in the middle of the list Oh so like, the thing people use linked lists for.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
81
programmingcirclejerk
Evinceo
hfxm56s
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>It's not just linked lists, it's any nontrivial data structure. Data considered harmful?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
60
programmingcirclejerk
NiceTerm
hfxtfxx
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>It's not just linked lists, it's any nontrivial data structure. Data considered harmful?<|eor|><|sor|>Our team is going dataless<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
57
programmingcirclejerk
xactac
hfwma9b
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>Lol no cdr coding<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
54
programmingcirclejerk
MCRusher
hfykwnh
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>> The standard library's LinkedList isn't the best example tbh, since it doesn't currently support the ability to do things like inserting or removing individual elements in the middle of the list Oh so like, the thing people use linked lists for.<|eor|><|sor|>It's a vector but with all the disadvantages of a linked list and none of the advantages. But it must have some hidden meaning, Rust is the perfect language.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
51
programmingcirclejerk
Mango1666
hfwoohd
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>i have been using linked lists for everything all the time... mutable strings, immutable strings, bytestrings, utf-8 strings, utf-16 strings, utf-32 strings... anything you can think of. even ascii strings (yes ascii still exists sweaty x10ers). no matter what, i cannot actualize the fact that linked lists are bad. my career would never take off if this were true.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
49
programmingcirclejerk
ProfessorSexyTime
hfwqmtt
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>Lol no cdr coding<|eor|><|sor|>Sounds like Lisp - 3 Rust - 0<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
48
programmingcirclejerk
northrupthebandgeek
hfxv31j
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>It's not just linked lists, it's any nontrivial data structure. Data considered harmful?<|eor|><|sor|>Our team is going dataless<|eor|><|sor|>Can't have a data breach if you don't have any data.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
34
programmingcirclejerk
LuciferK9
hfy86se
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj why would I want to implement something that should be in the standard library?<|eor|><|sor|>'cause you can make the wheel rounder<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
33
programmingcirclejerk
LuciferK9
hfy849x
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>It's not just linked lists, it's any nontrivial data structure. Data considered harmful?<|eor|><|sor|>Tried to learn Rust ages ago by implementing a binary tree and it felt so needlessly complicated.<|eor|><|sor|>Option<Box<Self<T>> considered harmful<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
26
programmingcirclejerk
MCRusher
hfykpcr
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>i have been using linked lists for everything all the time... mutable strings, immutable strings, bytestrings, utf-8 strings, utf-16 strings, utf-32 strings... anything you can think of. even ascii strings (yes ascii still exists sweaty x10ers). no matter what, i cannot actualize the fact that linked lists are bad. my career would never take off if this were true.<|eor|><|sor|>Store references to every link in the list in an array and you can have O[1] random access too.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
23
programmingcirclejerk
hugolive
hfyc11o
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj why would I want to implement something that should be in the standard library?<|eor|><|sor|>'cause you can make the wheel rounder<|eor|><|sor|>wheels dont scale<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
21
programmingcirclejerk
Haugerud
hg0t0uv
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>LinkedList is unnatural in rust. Contiguous arrays/vectors are unnatural in Haskell. Let the two beasts do battle, and in the sea of blood The Mighty Gopher shall rise.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
19
programmingcirclejerk
RustEvangelist10xer
hfy8x4q
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>It's not just linked lists, it's any nontrivial data structure. Data considered harmful?<|eor|><|sor|>Our team is going dataless<|eor|><|sor|>Can't have a data breach if you don't have any data.<|eor|><|sor|>It's virtually impossible for data breaches to happen as long as your code is in Rust. Rust safety got you covered. This explains why I never run into data breaches, no matter what project I work on.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
17
programmingcirclejerk
PaulExpendableTurtle
hfyic0g
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>It's not just linked lists, it's any nontrivial data structure. Data considered harmful?<|eor|><|sor|>Tried to learn Rust ages ago by implementing a binary tree and it felt so needlessly complicated.<|eor|><|sor|>Option<Box<Self<T>> considered harmful<|eor|><|sor|>Of course, because <> are unbalanced<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
16
programmingcirclejerk
r2d2_21
hfyflmb
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj why would I want to implement something that should be in the standard library?<|eor|><|sor|>Well, somebody has to implement the standard library <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
14
programmingcirclejerk
superjoe30
hfye9zq
<|sols|><|sot|>Does that fact the linked lists are awkward to implement in Rust mean that linked lists are bad?<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/q3iokp/linked_lists_and_rust/<|eol|><|sor|>linked lists are [bad](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZErvASwdlU). They're wicked. I would even say they are sick!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
9
programmingcirclejerk
senj
pj6p6o
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
133
programmingcirclejerk
fp_weenie
hbuzyxy
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>/Unjerk I'm genuinely curious about the kind of software these people create where abstractions are considered harmful.<|eor|><|sor|>> I'm genuinely curious about the kind of software these people create where abstractions are considered harmful. There's no such software, they're just dumb lmao<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
53
programmingcirclejerk
waxroy-finerayfool
hbv2nj1
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>/Unjerk I'm genuinely curious about the kind of software these people create where abstractions are considered harmful.<|eor|><|sor|>abstraction hurt Og head, revert to assemble<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
46
programmingcirclejerk
xX_MEM_Xx
hbuutxq
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine thinking generics aren't useful...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
40
programmingcirclejerk
roguas
hbv9s20
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>[I'm just going to leave this here!](https://github.com/search?q=%22func+Min%22&type=Code), at least some Go developers admit they need generics after all. >[With generics, the standard library can provide a generic Min function and we can be done with this reimplementation madness. (The same, of course, applies to many other functions). Having generics in the language is damned useful even if you never write any generic code yourself.](https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/hbus0wu?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)<|eor|><|sor|>Wait till they figure out Max function, GoogleConf 2030 - Avarage & Median<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
38
programmingcirclejerk
leaningtoweravenger
hbuvara
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine thinking generics aren't useful...<|eor|><|sor|>>Imagine thinking generics are~~n't~~ useful... ftfy<|eor|><|sor|>Lol generics<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
28
programmingcirclejerk
ComfortablyBalanced
hbuytv0
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>[I'm just going to leave this here!](https://github.com/search?q=%22func+Min%22&type=Code), at least some Go developers admit they need generics after all. >[With generics, the standard library can provide a generic Min function and we can be done with this reimplementation madness. (The same, of course, applies to many other functions). Having generics in the language is damned useful even if you never write any generic code yourself.](https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/hbus0wu?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
27
programmingcirclejerk
stone_henge
hbwmk2n
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine thinking generics aren't useful...<|eor|><|sor|>>Imagine thinking generics are~~n't~~ useful... ftfy<|eor|><|sor|>I'm sorry people don't understand the point of the sub and downvote you. The key point here is our users are PCJers, theyre not researchers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant jerk but we want to use them to build good circlejerks. So, the jerk material that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
27
programmingcirclejerk
cmov
hbw4wxf
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine thinking generics aren't useful...<|eor|><|sor|>> Imagine thinking That's not their strong suit.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
25
programmingcirclejerk
Bizzaro_Murphy
hbwm885
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>/Unjerk I'm genuinely curious about the kind of software these people create where abstractions are considered harmful.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj if Im doing < 200 lines in a solo environment I am happy to use JS over TS. If I can fit all the code in one file I dont miss the type system that much. I now dont need a compiler or build tool or worry about source map inaccuracies<|eor|><|sor|>I will reword my question, then: > I'm genuinely curious about the kind of software these people create where you're doing < 200 lines in a solo environment, other than toy one off scripts. Also: LOL webshit stuff.<|eor|><|sor|>Hey NodeJS can be used for the nonwebshit<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah NodeJS really is great for non-web stuff and the only downside is it runs at 5% the speed of native while taking 100x the RAM<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
24
programmingcirclejerk
senj
hbwbh52
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>One use case for generics is [emitting 332 copies of the code to free a pointer](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/10065)<|eor|><|soopr|>In Go you would copy and paste those 332 deallocs by hand and then spend the rest of the day telling other gophers how much more efficient and pragmatic your copy and paste based skill set is.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
19
programmingcirclejerk
scratchisthebest
hbvxg36
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>One use case for generics is [emitting 332 copies of the code to free a pointer](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/10065)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
18
programmingcirclejerk
NiceTerm
hbv5ibz
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>/Unjerk I'm genuinely curious about the kind of software these people create where abstractions are considered harmful.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj if Im doing < 200 lines in a solo environment I am happy to use JS over TS. If I can fit all the code in one file I dont miss the type system that much. I now dont need a compiler or build tool or worry about source map inaccuracies<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
18
programmingcirclejerk
GOPHERS_GONE_WILD
hbv47vk
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>He's never used generics and he's never missed them...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
17
programmingcirclejerk
senj
hbvg6so
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>[I'm just going to leave this here!](https://github.com/search?q=%22func+Min%22&type=Code), at least some Go developers admit they need generics after all. >[With generics, the standard library can provide a generic Min function and we can be done with this reimplementation madness. (The same, of course, applies to many other functions). Having generics in the language is damned useful even if you never write any generic code yourself.](https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/hbus0wu?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)<|eor|><|soopr|>Looks like mean()s back on the menu boys!<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
17
programmingcirclejerk
roguas
hbvh7ye
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine elementary school kids having more powerful toolchain than you, a veteran google engineer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
9
programmingcirclejerk
leaningtoweravenger
hbuv7al
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine thinking generics aren't useful...<|eor|><|sor|>>Imagine thinking generics are~~n't~~ useful... ftfy<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
9
programmingcirclejerk
MisterOfScience
hbxdgj7
<|sols|><|sot|>In my 4 years with Go, I never felt any need for generics. Interfaces serve me well. Is there any practical use case for generics?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/pj4va2/never_felt_need_for_generics_did_you/<|eol|><|sor|>/Unjerk I'm genuinely curious about the kind of software these people create where abstractions are considered harmful.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj if Im doing < 200 lines in a solo environment I am happy to use JS over TS. If I can fit all the code in one file I dont miss the type system that much. I now dont need a compiler or build tool or worry about source map inaccuracies<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Using a dynamic language is a bit different than using a typed language without generics. One of the solutions to lack of generics in go was to copy-paste code, at least JS just works as long as you don't make any errors.<|eor|><|sor|>> at least JS just works as long as you don't make any errors Nice! Thats a really cool language feature !<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
9
programmingcirclejerk
SkiddyX
phzzza
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
133
programmingcirclejerk
SkiddyX
hbm6mm8
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|soopr|>This guy makes absolute bangers on the *daily* - other hits include: - why you shouldn't hire hot woman at your startup - confesses to not knowing SQL despite being a founder of a (now defunct) NoSQL startup - admitting that he was on the "knifes edge" of becoming Elizabeth Holmes<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
95
programmingcirclejerk
duckbill_principate
hbm8rvb
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|soopr|>This guy makes absolute bangers on the *daily* - other hits include: - why you shouldn't hire hot woman at your startup - confesses to not knowing SQL despite being a founder of a (now defunct) NoSQL startup - admitting that he was on the "knifes edge" of becoming Elizabeth Holmes<|eoopr|><|sor|>> confesses to not knowing SQL despite being a founder of a (now defunct) NoSQL startup the past 15 years of webshittery in a nutshell<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
93
programmingcirclejerk
infinite-red
hbm8h9q
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>If Haskell is so great how come I can't make a abstract car object with a protected wheels attribute?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
92
programmingcirclejerk
IWannaFuckLarryPage
hbm7lv8
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|soopr|>This guy makes absolute bangers on the *daily* - other hits include: - why you shouldn't hire hot woman at your startup - confesses to not knowing SQL despite being a founder of a (now defunct) NoSQL startup - admitting that he was on the "knifes edge" of becoming Elizabeth Holmes<|eoopr|><|sor|>NoSQL means I need to know no SQL<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
70
programmingcirclejerk
NiceTerm
hbmmo49
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Actually lol no algebraic data types and no match<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>In Typescript, types are not types, they are hearty recommendations<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
53
programmingcirclejerk
zygohistomoronism
hbndpef
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>TypeScript, featuring : - no monads - `undefined` - `null` - `any` - [`is-arrayish`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-arrayish) - amazing type coercion - no pattern matching - no meta programming - no HKTs - no typeclasses - no green threads - no threads of any color - npm Both languages really are identical, we should just all switch to the webshit one. At least people are payed to use it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
45
programmingcirclejerk
freak_dessert2
hbmctt9
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>If Haskell is so great how come I can't make a abstract car object with a protected wheels attribute?<|eor|><|sor|>Better question is: why didn't they code themselves a Haskell 2?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
41
programmingcirclejerk
YM_Industries
hbnotlp
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>TypeScript, featuring : - no monads - `undefined` - `null` - `any` - [`is-arrayish`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-arrayish) - amazing type coercion - no pattern matching - no meta programming - no HKTs - no typeclasses - no green threads - no threads of any color - npm Both languages really are identical, we should just all switch to the webshit one. At least people are payed to use it.<|eor|><|sor|>Being able to distinguish between `""`, `0`, `-0`, `NaN`, `undefined`, and `null` is really useful. Personally I think JS/TS should introduce `nil` and `None` as well, so that developers can represent even more types of nothing.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
35
programmingcirclejerk
lambda-male
hbm7g28
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Actually lol no algebraic data types and no match<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
34
programmingcirclejerk
pareidolist
hbm6ulw
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>If Haskell is so great, how come it doesn't have a `keyof` operator?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
27
programmingcirclejerk
YM_Industries
hbnoj3w
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|soopr|>This guy makes absolute bangers on the *daily* - other hits include: - why you shouldn't hire hot woman at your startup - confesses to not knowing SQL despite being a founder of a (now defunct) NoSQL startup - admitting that he was on the "knifes edge" of becoming Elizabeth Holmes<|eoopr|><|sor|>> confesses to not knowing SQL despite being a founder of a (now defunct) NoSQL startup This is tautology. EDIT: Determining whether the tautology is in "now defunct NoSQL startup" or "not knowing SQL despite being a founder of a NoSQL startup" is left as an exercise to the reader.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
26
programmingcirclejerk
ProfessorSexyTime
hbmcg2a
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>> JavaScript is Lisp for the masses too, but only 5% as useful since we got closures but not macros. REEEEEEEE >>Macros are a really fun but devastatingly bad idea. ### REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
25
programmingcirclejerk
Nilstrieb
hbmifl5
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>Typescript has some amazing type magic like string interpolation and being able to use values as types, but it's held back be the technology of our time (j*vascript)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
18
programmingcirclejerk
Badel2
hbmo88p
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Actually lol no algebraic data types and no match<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>In Typescript, types are not types, they are hearty recommendations<|eor|><|sor|>They are type hints, not type obligations.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
17
programmingcirclejerk
xigoi
hbnxxx0
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>If Haskell is so great how come I can't make a abstract car object with a protected wheels attribute?<|eor|><|sor|>Better question is: why didn't they code themselves a Haskell 2?<|eor|><|sor|>For great bad.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
12
programmingcirclejerk
_green_is_my_pepper
hbmaucf
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>lol no TCO lol no lazy evaluation<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
throwawhatwhenwhere
hbqc9vn
<|sols|><|sot|>"Typescript is Haskell for the masses. 10% as powerful, 10,000% as useful."<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1434018146243923974<|eol|><|sor|>TypeScript, featuring : - no monads - `undefined` - `null` - `any` - [`is-arrayish`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-arrayish) - amazing type coercion - no pattern matching - no meta programming - no HKTs - no typeclasses - no green threads - no threads of any color - npm Both languages really are identical, we should just all switch to the webshit one. At least people are payed to use it.<|eor|><|sor|>Being able to distinguish between `""`, `0`, `-0`, `NaN`, `undefined`, and `null` is really useful. Personally I think JS/TS should introduce `nil` and `None` as well, so that developers can represent even more types of nothing.<|eor|><|sor|>I propose '', the empty Char<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
9
programmingcirclejerk
etaionshrd
myqn7l
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
133
programmingcirclejerk
mizzu704
gvwmitm
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No, but he's shipped industrial-grade malware. If you know what I mean. (I mean C++)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
141
programmingcirclejerk
lampshadish2
gvx7fy1
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No compilers are industry grade because they dont use cloud-first, event-driven, microservice architecture.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
43
programmingcirclejerk
BufferUnderpants
gvx2yle
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|> Bjarne wouldnt last a day in the rigors of internal ERP development<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
39
programmingcirclejerk
camelCaseIsWebScale
gvwsqy4
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No, but he's shipped industrial-grade malware. If you know what I mean. (I mean C++)<|eor|><|sor|>He has only specified it. (Cfront was not industry grade btw..)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
34
programmingcirclejerk
tnbd
gvx73a2
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No, but he's shipped industrial-grade malware. If you know what I mean. (I mean C++)<|eor|><|sor|>Overly complex, full of bugs and undefined behavior, not fun too use compared to newer alternatives* but has lock-in due to its age... Doesn't get more industrial grade than that! * R u s t u s t<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
25
programmingcirclejerk
muntaxitome
gvx1vgn
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>Industrial grade? Is that like the SCADA software where every line of code has a vulnerability?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
22
programmingcirclejerk
voidvector
gvyslen
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No, but he's shipped industrial-grade malware. If you know what I mean. (I mean C++)<|eor|><|sor|>Calling C++ a malware is a disservice to the honorable and hardworking malwares everywhere that strive to put food on the table for their benefactors.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
21
programmingcirclejerk
PL_Design
gvx71rg
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>til barney starsoup is a professional rubber ducky. i wish to take him into the bath with me<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
19
programmingcirclejerk
YM_Industries
gvwy4zj
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>Bjarne certainly isnt up to React standards. Dont know if hed be capable of writing JavaScript<|eor|><|sor|>Npm isnstall c++<|eor|><|sor|>I'd definitely like to isn'tall npm.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
18
programmingcirclejerk
PrimozDelux
gvxwd41
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No, but he's shipped industrial-grade malware. If you know what I mean. (I mean C++)<|eor|><|sor|>Meh, to be fair I'd say creating C++ is quite an accomplishment, especially considering its use in games today. There's plenty of other people we could make fun of for their software circlejerking and lack of actual software accomplishments (Martin Fowler lol?) but I don't think he's one of them.<|eor|><|sor|>I use it because it's the language LLVM was written in, and C++ is so utterly mediocre at best that I just can't picture Bjarne as a brilliant guy. To me he's more of a committee-wrangler that accidentally made a language just barely less awful than the competition and now he and the rest of us is stuck with his mess. Written in a superposition of jerk/unjerk<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
16
programmingcirclejerk
doyouevensunbro
gvxvhhv
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|> Bjarne wouldnt last a day in the rigors of internal ERP development<|eor|><|sor|>Indeed, my job in erotic role play development was incredibly intense and rigorous.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
15
programmingcirclejerk
BufferUnderpants
gvxwasy
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No compilers are industry grade because they dont use cloud-first, event-driven, microservice architecture.<|eor|><|sor|>More like "real programmers work in shitcode Enterprise applications built in 8 layers on a twice-deprecated version of a framework that blows at runtime three times for every line of code changed"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
10
programmingcirclejerk
camelCaseIsWebScale
gvx5hxv
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>Industrial grade? Is that like the SCADA software where every line of code has a vulnerability?<|eor|><|sor|>Sounds like C++.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
8
programmingcirclejerk
hnerixh
gvxp7tc
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>/uj I hate how he insists on using sans-serif for code and names variable like a 15 yo acne riddled teen.<|eor|><|sor|>Computer Modern is the only legitimate choice.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
8
programmingcirclejerk
usernameqwerty005
gvxz1p4
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No, but he's shipped industrial-grade malware. If you know what I mean. (I mean C++)<|eor|><|sor|>Overly complex, full of bugs and undefined behavior, not fun too use compared to newer alternatives* but has lock-in due to its age... Doesn't get more industrial grade than that! * R u s t u s t<|eor|><|sor|>E n t e r p r i s e<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
8
programmingcirclejerk
lampshadish2
gvxvsl8
<|sols|><|sot|>I wonder, has Bjarne Stroustrup even shipped any industrial-grade software?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26938693<|eol|><|sor|>No compilers are industry grade because they dont use cloud-first, event-driven, microservice architecture.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Can't wait to implement a compile time bitcoin miner using C++ templates...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
6
programmingcirclejerk
alibix
mt8dhx
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
132
programmingcirclejerk
lazic_
guy8qst
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>/uj Holy crap is LinkedIn a toxic slum.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
100
programmingcirclejerk
voidvector
guydro6
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> A computer scientist **in theory** should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. In practice they design blasphemous entities such as Go and JabbaScript<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
82
programmingcirclejerk
alibix
guy766k
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>STOP CALLING ME A FUCKING CODER OR PROGRAMMER SHOW ME SOME RESPECT AND CALL ME BY MY JOB TITLE, S O F T W A R E E N G I N E E R<|eor|><|soopr|>Sure. Show me your reimplementation of CPython<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
75
programmingcirclejerk
GOPHERS_GONE_WILD
guy5mef
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>STOP CALLING ME A FUCKING CODER OR PROGRAMMER SHOW ME SOME RESPECT AND CALL ME BY MY JOB TITLE, S O F T W A R E E N G I N E E R<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
71
programmingcirclejerk
SelfDistinction
guyc23t
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>/uj Holy crap is LinkedIn a toxic slum.<|eor|><|sor|>Either you die an underappreciated platform or you live long enough to see yourself become a toxic slum.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
49
programmingcirclejerk
avinassh
guyy798
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>STOP CALLING ME A FUCKING CODER OR PROGRAMMER SHOW ME SOME RESPECT AND CALL ME BY MY JOB TITLE, S O F T W A R E E N G I N E E R<|eor|><|soopr|>Sure. Show me your reimplementation of CPython<|eoopr|><|sor|> use std::process::Command; fn Rython() -> Result<()> { Command::new("python3").arg("codez.py").output()?; } I implemented it in Rust and I call it Rython, it has zero cost abstraction, memory safety, blah blah blah blah, and it is moral.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
48
programmingcirclejerk
alibix
guyfrlf
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|soopr|>In theory, the title "software engineer" should only be applied as a title if you use vim<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
40
programmingcirclejerk
trollman_falcon
guy7c31
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Degreetards BTFO The real software engineers are us bootchads <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
38
programmingcirclejerk
camelCaseIsWebScale
guy9zhj
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Normie psychology is not my specialization. Come back again once you understand cache locality and out of order execution.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
36
programmingcirclejerk
tnbd
guyhtp6
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>> A computer scientist **in theory** should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. In practice they design blasphemous entities such as Go and JabbaScript<|eor|><|sor|>More like a Haskal++ or a prover such as the one formerly known as "The Coq". The languages you mentioned are more aimed towards children aged 5 to 15<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
35
programmingcirclejerk
alibix
guy9jpr
<|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Social jerk.<|eor|><|soopr|>If you ignore the mansplaining bit it's a classic bootcamp vs degree fight<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|>
35