Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Convert this Julia snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Julia to Java without modifying what it does.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Julia implementation.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Translate the given Julia code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Julia.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Julia to VB, same semantics.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Julia.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Julia snippet.
isflat(x) = isempty(x) || first(x) === x function flat_mapreduce(arr) mapreduce(vcat, arr, init=[]) do x isflat(x) ? x : flat(x) end end
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Translate the given Lua code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Lua, keeping it the same logically?
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Lua to C# without modifying what it does.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Convert the following code from Lua to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original Lua code.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this Lua code.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Lua snippet.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in Lua.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Lua snippet.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Write a version of this Lua function in Python with identical behavior.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Lua to VB, same semantics.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Convert the following code from Lua to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
function flatten(list) if type(list) ~= "table" then return {list} end local flat_list = {} for _, elem in ipairs(list) do for _, val in ipairs(flatten(elem)) do flat_list[#flat_list + 1] = val end end return flat_list end test_list = {{1}, 2, {{3,4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}} print(table...
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Port the provided Mathematica code into C while preserving the original functionality.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Mathematica.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to C#, same semantics.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Mathematica to C#.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Port the provided Mathematica code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Mathematica.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to Java, same semantics.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Port the provided Mathematica code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to Python, same semantics.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Convert this Mathematica block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Port the following code from Mathematica to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Convert this Mathematica snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
Flatten[{{1}, 2, {{3, 4}, 5}, {{{}}}, {{{6}}}, 7, 8, {}}]
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Nim snippet.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Port the following code from Nim to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Nim snippet.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Convert the following code from Nim to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Convert this Nim block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Transform the following Nim implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Nim snippet.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Transform the following Nim implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Nim.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Port the following code from Nim to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Nim, keeping it the same logically?
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Nim code in Go.
type TreeList[T] = object case isLeaf: bool of true: data: T of false: list: seq[TreeList[T]] proc L[T](list: varargs[TreeList[T]]): TreeList[T] = for x in list: result.list.add x proc N[T](data: T): TreeList[T] = TreeList[T](isLeaf: true, data: data) proc flatten[T](n: TreeList[T]): seq[T] = ...
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Please provide an equivalent version of this OCaml code in C.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Convert this OCaml block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this OCaml implementation.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this OCaml implementation.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Port the following code from OCaml to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this OCaml code.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original OCaml code.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Convert this OCaml block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Port the following code from OCaml to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Write the same algorithm in VB as shown in this OCaml implementation.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in OCaml.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Convert this OCaml block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
# let flatten = List.concat ;; val flatten : 'a list list -> 'a list = <fun> # let li = [[1]; 2; [[3;4]; 5]; [[[]]]; [[[6]]]; 7; 8; []] ;; ^^^ Error: This expression has type int but is here used with type int list # flatten [[1]; [2; 3; 4]; []; [5; 6]; [7]; [8]] ;; - : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6...
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Change the following Perl code into C without altering its purpose.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Convert this Perl block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Port the provided Perl code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Perl implementation.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Convert this Perl snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Perl snippet.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Port the following code from Perl to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Convert this Perl block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Translate the given Perl code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Port the provided Perl code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Ensure the translated VB code behaves exactly like the original Perl snippet.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Perl code in VB.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this Perl implementation.
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Perl, keeping it the same logically?
sub flatten { map { ref eq 'ARRAY' ? flatten(@$_) : $_ } @_ } my @lst = ([1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []); print flatten(@lst), "\n";
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Generate an equivalent C version of this PowerShell code.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Convert the following code from PowerShell to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Convert the following code from PowerShell to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from PowerShell to C#, same semantics.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Write a version of this PowerShell function in C++ with identical behavior.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from PowerShell to C++.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in PowerShell.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in PowerShell.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Please provide an equivalent version of this PowerShell code in Python.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Convert the following code from PowerShell to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Write the same code in VB as shown below in PowerShell.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Please provide an equivalent version of this PowerShell code in VB.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
class flattener dim separator sub class_initialize separator = "," end sub private function makeflat( a ) dim i dim res for i = lbound( a ) to ubound( a ) if isarray( a( i ) ) then res = res & makeflat( a( i ) ) else res = res & a( i ) & separator end if next makeflat = res end f...
Translate the given PowerShell code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Translate the given PowerShell code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
function flatten($a) { if($a.Count -gt 1) { $a | foreach{ $(flatten $_)} } else {$a} } $a = @(@(1), 2, @(@(3,4), 5), @(@(@())), @(@(@(6))), 7, 8, @()) "$(flatten $a)"
package main import "fmt" func list(s ...interface{}) []interface{} { return s } func main() { s := list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list(), ) fmt.Println(s) fmt.Println(flatten(s)) } func...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in R.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Please provide an equivalent version of this R code in C.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct list_t list_t, *list; struct list_t{ int is_list, ival; list *lst; }; list new_list() { list x = malloc(sizeof(list_t)); x->ival = 0; x->is_list = 1; x->lst = 0; return x; } void append(list parent, list child) { parent->lst = realloc...
Change the programming language of this snippet from R to C# without modifying what it does.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this R implementation.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
using System; using System.Collections; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaCodeTasks { static class FlattenList { public static ArrayList Flatten(this ArrayList List) { ArrayList NewList = new ArrayList ( ); NewList.AddRange ( List ); while ( NewList.OfType<ArrayList> ( ).Count ( ) > 0 ) { int...
Write a version of this R function in C++ with identical behavior.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the R version.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
#include <list> #include <boost/any.hpp> typedef std::list<boost::any> anylist; void flatten(std::list<boost::any>& list) { typedef anylist::iterator iterator; iterator current = list.begin(); while (current != list.end()) { if (current->type() == typeid(anylist)) { iterator next = current; ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from R to Java, same semantics.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Convert this R snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
import java.util.LinkedList; import java.util.List; public final class FlattenUtil { public static List<Object> flatten(List<?> list) { List<Object> retVal = new LinkedList<Object>(); flatten(list, retVal); return retVal; } public static void flatten(List<?> fromTreeList, List<Object> toFlatList) { for (...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this R implementation.
x <- list(list(1), 2, list(list(3, 4), 5), list(list(list())), list(list(list(6))), 7, 8, list()) unlist(x)
>>> def flatten(lst): return sum( ([x] if not isinstance(x, list) else flatten(x) for x in lst), [] ) >>> lst = [[1], 2, [[3,4], 5], [[[]]], [[[6]]], 7, 8, []] >>> flatten(lst) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]