Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
use warnings; use strict; sub mdr { my $n = shift; my($count, $mdr) = (0, $n); while ($mdr > 9) { my($m, $dm) = ($mdr, 1); while ($m) { $dm *= $m % 10; $m = int($m/10); } $mdr = $dm; $count++; } ($count, $mdr); } print "Number: (MP, MDR)\n====== =========\n"; foreach my $n (...
package main import "fmt" func mult(n uint64, base int) (mult uint64) { for mult = 1; mult > 0 && n > 0; n /= uint64(base) { mult *= n % uint64(base) } return } func MultDigitalRoot(n uint64, base int) (mp, mdr int) { var m uint64 for m = n; m >= uint64(base); mp++ { m = mult(m, base) } return mp, int(m...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Racket code in C.
#lang racket (define (digital-product n) (define (inr-d-p m rv) (cond [(zero? m) rv] [else (define-values (q r) (quotient/remainder m 10)) (if (zero? r) 0 (inr-d-p q (* rv r)))])) (inr-d-p n 1)) (define (mdr/mp n) (define (inr-mdr/mp m i) (if (< m 10) (values m i) (inr-mdr/mp (di...
#include <stdio.h> #define twidth 5 #define mdr(rmdr, rmp, n)\ do { *rmp = 0; _mdr(rmdr, rmp, n); } while (0) void _mdr(int *rmdr, int *rmp, long long n) { int r = n ? 1 : 0; while (n) { r *= (n % 10); n /= 10; } (*rmp)++; if (r >= 10) _mdr(rmdr, rmp, r); el...
Convert this Racket snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
#lang racket (define (digital-product n) (define (inr-d-p m rv) (cond [(zero? m) rv] [else (define-values (q r) (quotient/remainder m 10)) (if (zero? r) 0 (inr-d-p q (* rv r)))])) (inr-d-p n 1)) (define (mdr/mp n) (define (inr-mdr/mp m i) (if (< m 10) (values m i) (inr-mdr/mp (di...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; class Program { static Tuple<int, int> DigitalRoot(long num) { int mp = 0; while (num > 9) { num = num.ToString().ToCharArray().Select(x => x - '0').Aggregate((a, b) => a * b); mp++; } ...
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original Racket code.
#lang racket (define (digital-product n) (define (inr-d-p m rv) (cond [(zero? m) rv] [else (define-values (q r) (quotient/remainder m 10)) (if (zero? r) 0 (inr-d-p q (* rv r)))])) (inr-d-p n 1)) (define (mdr/mp n) (define (inr-mdr/mp m i) (if (< m 10) (values m i) (inr-mdr/mp (di...
#include <iomanip> #include <map> #include <vector> #include <iostream> using namespace std; void calcMDR( int n, int c, int& a, int& b ) { int m = n % 10; n /= 10; while( n ) { m *= ( n % 10 ); n /= 10; } if( m >= 10 ) calcMDR( m, ++c, a, b ); else { a = m; b = c; } } void table() { map...
Convert the following code from Racket to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
#lang racket (define (digital-product n) (define (inr-d-p m rv) (cond [(zero? m) rv] [else (define-values (q r) (quotient/remainder m 10)) (if (zero? r) 0 (inr-d-p q (* rv r)))])) (inr-d-p n 1)) (define (mdr/mp n) (define (inr-mdr/mp m i) (if (< m 10) (values m i) (inr-mdr/mp (di...
import java.util.*; public class MultiplicativeDigitalRoot { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("NUMBER MDR MP"); for (long n : new long[]{123321, 7739, 893, 899998}) { long[] a = multiplicativeDigitalRoot(n); System.out.printf("%6d %4d %4d%n", ...
Convert the following code from Racket to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
#lang racket (define (digital-product n) (define (inr-d-p m rv) (cond [(zero? m) rv] [else (define-values (q r) (quotient/remainder m 10)) (if (zero? r) 0 (inr-d-p q (* rv r)))])) (inr-d-p n 1)) (define (mdr/mp n) (define (inr-mdr/mp m i) (if (< m 10) (values m i) (inr-mdr/mp (di...
try: from functools import reduce except: pass def mdroot(n): 'Multiplicative digital root' mdr = [n] while mdr[-1] > 9: mdr.append(reduce(int.__mul__, (int(dig) for dig in str(mdr[-1])), 1)) return len(mdr) - 1, mdr[-1] if __name__ == '__main__': print('Number: (MP, MDR)\n====== ...
Transform the following Racket implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
#lang racket (define (digital-product n) (define (inr-d-p m rv) (cond [(zero? m) rv] [else (define-values (q r) (quotient/remainder m 10)) (if (zero? r) 0 (inr-d-p q (* rv r)))])) (inr-d-p n 1)) (define (mdr/mp n) (define (inr-mdr/mp m i) (if (< m 10) (values m i) (inr-mdr/mp (di...
package main import "fmt" func mult(n uint64, base int) (mult uint64) { for mult = 1; mult > 0 && n > 0; n /= uint64(base) { mult *= n % uint64(base) } return } func MultDigitalRoot(n uint64, base int) (mp, mdr int) { var m uint64 for m = n; m >= uint64(base); mp++ { m = mult(m, base) } return mp, int(m...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in REXX.
numeric digits 100 parse arg x if x='' | x="," then x=123321 7739 893 899998 say center('number', 8) ' persistence multiplicative digital root' say copies('─' , 8) ' ─────────── ───────────────────────────' ...
#include <stdio.h> #define twidth 5 #define mdr(rmdr, rmp, n)\ do { *rmp = 0; _mdr(rmdr, rmp, n); } while (0) void _mdr(int *rmdr, int *rmp, long long n) { int r = n ? 1 : 0; while (n) { r *= (n % 10); n /= 10; } (*rmp)++; if (r >= 10) _mdr(rmdr, rmp, r); el...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from REXX to C#.
numeric digits 100 parse arg x if x='' | x="," then x=123321 7739 893 899998 say center('number', 8) ' persistence multiplicative digital root' say copies('─' , 8) ' ─────────── ───────────────────────────' ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; class Program { static Tuple<int, int> DigitalRoot(long num) { int mp = 0; while (num > 9) { num = num.ToString().ToCharArray().Select(x => x - '0').Aggregate((a, b) => a * b); mp++; } ...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this REXX code.
numeric digits 100 parse arg x if x='' | x="," then x=123321 7739 893 899998 say center('number', 8) ' persistence multiplicative digital root' say copies('─' , 8) ' ─────────── ───────────────────────────' ...
#include <iomanip> #include <map> #include <vector> #include <iostream> using namespace std; void calcMDR( int n, int c, int& a, int& b ) { int m = n % 10; n /= 10; while( n ) { m *= ( n % 10 ); n /= 10; } if( m >= 10 ) calcMDR( m, ++c, a, b ); else { a = m; b = c; } } void table() { map...
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
numeric digits 100 parse arg x if x='' | x="," then x=123321 7739 893 899998 say center('number', 8) ' persistence multiplicative digital root' say copies('─' , 8) ' ─────────── ───────────────────────────' ...
import java.util.*; public class MultiplicativeDigitalRoot { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("NUMBER MDR MP"); for (long n : new long[]{123321, 7739, 893, 899998}) { long[] a = multiplicativeDigitalRoot(n); System.out.printf("%6d %4d %4d%n", ...
Translate the given REXX code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
numeric digits 100 parse arg x if x='' | x="," then x=123321 7739 893 899998 say center('number', 8) ' persistence multiplicative digital root' say copies('─' , 8) ' ─────────── ───────────────────────────' ...
try: from functools import reduce except: pass def mdroot(n): 'Multiplicative digital root' mdr = [n] while mdr[-1] > 9: mdr.append(reduce(int.__mul__, (int(dig) for dig in str(mdr[-1])), 1)) return len(mdr) - 1, mdr[-1] if __name__ == '__main__': print('Number: (MP, MDR)\n====== ...
Change the following REXX code into Go without altering its purpose.
numeric digits 100 parse arg x if x='' | x="," then x=123321 7739 893 899998 say center('number', 8) ' persistence multiplicative digital root' say copies('─' , 8) ' ─────────── ───────────────────────────' ...
package main import "fmt" func mult(n uint64, base int) (mult uint64) { for mult = 1; mult > 0 && n > 0; n /= uint64(base) { mult *= n % uint64(base) } return } func MultDigitalRoot(n uint64, base int) (mp, mdr int) { var m uint64 for m = n; m >= uint64(base); mp++ { m = mult(m, base) } return mp, int(m...
Convert the following code from Ruby to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
def mdroot(n) mdr, persist = n, 0 until mdr < 10 do mdr = mdr.digits.inject(:*) persist += 1 end [mdr, persist] end puts "Number: MDR MP", "====== === ==" [123321, 7739, 893, 899998].each{|n| puts "%6d: %d %2d" % [n, *mdroot(n)]} counter = Hash.new{|h,k| h[k]=[]} 0.step do |i| counter[mdroot(i...
#include <stdio.h> #define twidth 5 #define mdr(rmdr, rmp, n)\ do { *rmp = 0; _mdr(rmdr, rmp, n); } while (0) void _mdr(int *rmdr, int *rmp, long long n) { int r = n ? 1 : 0; while (n) { r *= (n % 10); n /= 10; } (*rmp)++; if (r >= 10) _mdr(rmdr, rmp, r); el...
Transform the following Ruby implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
def mdroot(n) mdr, persist = n, 0 until mdr < 10 do mdr = mdr.digits.inject(:*) persist += 1 end [mdr, persist] end puts "Number: MDR MP", "====== === ==" [123321, 7739, 893, 899998].each{|n| puts "%6d: %d %2d" % [n, *mdroot(n)]} counter = Hash.new{|h,k| h[k]=[]} 0.step do |i| counter[mdroot(i...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; class Program { static Tuple<int, int> DigitalRoot(long num) { int mp = 0; while (num > 9) { num = num.ToString().ToCharArray().Select(x => x - '0').Aggregate((a, b) => a * b); mp++; } ...
Convert the following code from Ruby to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
def mdroot(n) mdr, persist = n, 0 until mdr < 10 do mdr = mdr.digits.inject(:*) persist += 1 end [mdr, persist] end puts "Number: MDR MP", "====== === ==" [123321, 7739, 893, 899998].each{|n| puts "%6d: %d %2d" % [n, *mdroot(n)]} counter = Hash.new{|h,k| h[k]=[]} 0.step do |i| counter[mdroot(i...
#include <iomanip> #include <map> #include <vector> #include <iostream> using namespace std; void calcMDR( int n, int c, int& a, int& b ) { int m = n % 10; n /= 10; while( n ) { m *= ( n % 10 ); n /= 10; } if( m >= 10 ) calcMDR( m, ++c, a, b ); else { a = m; b = c; } } void table() { map...
Convert this Ruby snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
def mdroot(n) mdr, persist = n, 0 until mdr < 10 do mdr = mdr.digits.inject(:*) persist += 1 end [mdr, persist] end puts "Number: MDR MP", "====== === ==" [123321, 7739, 893, 899998].each{|n| puts "%6d: %d %2d" % [n, *mdroot(n)]} counter = Hash.new{|h,k| h[k]=[]} 0.step do |i| counter[mdroot(i...
import java.util.*; public class MultiplicativeDigitalRoot { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("NUMBER MDR MP"); for (long n : new long[]{123321, 7739, 893, 899998}) { long[] a = multiplicativeDigitalRoot(n); System.out.printf("%6d %4d %4d%n", ...
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Ruby version.
def mdroot(n) mdr, persist = n, 0 until mdr < 10 do mdr = mdr.digits.inject(:*) persist += 1 end [mdr, persist] end puts "Number: MDR MP", "====== === ==" [123321, 7739, 893, 899998].each{|n| puts "%6d: %d %2d" % [n, *mdroot(n)]} counter = Hash.new{|h,k| h[k]=[]} 0.step do |i| counter[mdroot(i...
try: from functools import reduce except: pass def mdroot(n): 'Multiplicative digital root' mdr = [n] while mdr[-1] > 9: mdr.append(reduce(int.__mul__, (int(dig) for dig in str(mdr[-1])), 1)) return len(mdr) - 1, mdr[-1] if __name__ == '__main__': print('Number: (MP, MDR)\n====== ...
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Ruby.
def mdroot(n) mdr, persist = n, 0 until mdr < 10 do mdr = mdr.digits.inject(:*) persist += 1 end [mdr, persist] end puts "Number: MDR MP", "====== === ==" [123321, 7739, 893, 899998].each{|n| puts "%6d: %d %2d" % [n, *mdroot(n)]} counter = Hash.new{|h,k| h[k]=[]} 0.step do |i| counter[mdroot(i...
package main import "fmt" func mult(n uint64, base int) (mult uint64) { for mult = 1; mult > 0 && n > 0; n /= uint64(base) { mult *= n % uint64(base) } return } func MultDigitalRoot(n uint64, base int) (mp, mdr int) { var m uint64 for m = n; m >= uint64(base); mp++ { m = mult(m, base) } return mp, int(m...
Convert this Scala snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
fun multDigitalRoot(n: Int): Pair<Int, Int> = when { n < 0 -> throw IllegalArgumentException("Negative numbers not allowed") else -> { var mdr: Int var mp = 0 var nn = n do { mdr = if (nn > 0) 1 else 0 while (nn > 0) ...
#include <stdio.h> #define twidth 5 #define mdr(rmdr, rmp, n)\ do { *rmp = 0; _mdr(rmdr, rmp, n); } while (0) void _mdr(int *rmdr, int *rmp, long long n) { int r = n ? 1 : 0; while (n) { r *= (n % 10); n /= 10; } (*rmp)++; if (r >= 10) _mdr(rmdr, rmp, r); el...
Port the provided Scala code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
fun multDigitalRoot(n: Int): Pair<Int, Int> = when { n < 0 -> throw IllegalArgumentException("Negative numbers not allowed") else -> { var mdr: Int var mp = 0 var nn = n do { mdr = if (nn > 0) 1 else 0 while (nn > 0) ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; class Program { static Tuple<int, int> DigitalRoot(long num) { int mp = 0; while (num > 9) { num = num.ToString().ToCharArray().Select(x => x - '0').Aggregate((a, b) => a * b); mp++; } ...
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Scala snippet.
fun multDigitalRoot(n: Int): Pair<Int, Int> = when { n < 0 -> throw IllegalArgumentException("Negative numbers not allowed") else -> { var mdr: Int var mp = 0 var nn = n do { mdr = if (nn > 0) 1 else 0 while (nn > 0) ...
#include <iomanip> #include <map> #include <vector> #include <iostream> using namespace std; void calcMDR( int n, int c, int& a, int& b ) { int m = n % 10; n /= 10; while( n ) { m *= ( n % 10 ); n /= 10; } if( m >= 10 ) calcMDR( m, ++c, a, b ); else { a = m; b = c; } } void table() { map...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
fun multDigitalRoot(n: Int): Pair<Int, Int> = when { n < 0 -> throw IllegalArgumentException("Negative numbers not allowed") else -> { var mdr: Int var mp = 0 var nn = n do { mdr = if (nn > 0) 1 else 0 while (nn > 0) ...
import java.util.*; public class MultiplicativeDigitalRoot { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("NUMBER MDR MP"); for (long n : new long[]{123321, 7739, 893, 899998}) { long[] a = multiplicativeDigitalRoot(n); System.out.printf("%6d %4d %4d%n", ...
Transform the following Scala implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
fun multDigitalRoot(n: Int): Pair<Int, Int> = when { n < 0 -> throw IllegalArgumentException("Negative numbers not allowed") else -> { var mdr: Int var mp = 0 var nn = n do { mdr = if (nn > 0) 1 else 0 while (nn > 0) ...
try: from functools import reduce except: pass def mdroot(n): 'Multiplicative digital root' mdr = [n] while mdr[-1] > 9: mdr.append(reduce(int.__mul__, (int(dig) for dig in str(mdr[-1])), 1)) return len(mdr) - 1, mdr[-1] if __name__ == '__main__': print('Number: (MP, MDR)\n====== ...
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Scala.
fun multDigitalRoot(n: Int): Pair<Int, Int> = when { n < 0 -> throw IllegalArgumentException("Negative numbers not allowed") else -> { var mdr: Int var mp = 0 var nn = n do { mdr = if (nn > 0) 1 else 0 while (nn > 0) ...
package main import "fmt" func mult(n uint64, base int) (mult uint64) { for mult = 1; mult > 0 && n > 0; n /= uint64(base) { mult *= n % uint64(base) } return } func MultDigitalRoot(n uint64, base int) (mp, mdr int) { var m uint64 for m = n; m >= uint64(base); mp++ { m = mult(m, base) } return mp, int(m...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Tcl.
proc mdr {n} { if {$n < 0 || ![string is integer $n]} { error "must be an integer" } for {set i 0} {$n > 9} {incr i} { set n [tcl::mathop::* {*}[split $n ""]] } return [list $i $n] }
#include <stdio.h> #define twidth 5 #define mdr(rmdr, rmp, n)\ do { *rmp = 0; _mdr(rmdr, rmp, n); } while (0) void _mdr(int *rmdr, int *rmp, long long n) { int r = n ? 1 : 0; while (n) { r *= (n % 10); n /= 10; } (*rmp)++; if (r >= 10) _mdr(rmdr, rmp, r); el...
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
proc mdr {n} { if {$n < 0 || ![string is integer $n]} { error "must be an integer" } for {set i 0} {$n > 9} {incr i} { set n [tcl::mathop::* {*}[split $n ""]] } return [list $i $n] }
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; class Program { static Tuple<int, int> DigitalRoot(long num) { int mp = 0; while (num > 9) { num = num.ToString().ToCharArray().Select(x => x - '0').Aggregate((a, b) => a * b); mp++; } ...
Convert this Tcl block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
proc mdr {n} { if {$n < 0 || ![string is integer $n]} { error "must be an integer" } for {set i 0} {$n > 9} {incr i} { set n [tcl::mathop::* {*}[split $n ""]] } return [list $i $n] }
#include <iomanip> #include <map> #include <vector> #include <iostream> using namespace std; void calcMDR( int n, int c, int& a, int& b ) { int m = n % 10; n /= 10; while( n ) { m *= ( n % 10 ); n /= 10; } if( m >= 10 ) calcMDR( m, ++c, a, b ); else { a = m; b = c; } } void table() { map...
Port the following code from Tcl to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
proc mdr {n} { if {$n < 0 || ![string is integer $n]} { error "must be an integer" } for {set i 0} {$n > 9} {incr i} { set n [tcl::mathop::* {*}[split $n ""]] } return [list $i $n] }
import java.util.*; public class MultiplicativeDigitalRoot { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("NUMBER MDR MP"); for (long n : new long[]{123321, 7739, 893, 899998}) { long[] a = multiplicativeDigitalRoot(n); System.out.printf("%6d %4d %4d%n", ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Tcl to Python without modifying what it does.
proc mdr {n} { if {$n < 0 || ![string is integer $n]} { error "must be an integer" } for {set i 0} {$n > 9} {incr i} { set n [tcl::mathop::* {*}[split $n ""]] } return [list $i $n] }
try: from functools import reduce except: pass def mdroot(n): 'Multiplicative digital root' mdr = [n] while mdr[-1] > 9: mdr.append(reduce(int.__mul__, (int(dig) for dig in str(mdr[-1])), 1)) return len(mdr) - 1, mdr[-1] if __name__ == '__main__': print('Number: (MP, MDR)\n====== ...
Port the following code from Tcl to Go with equivalent syntax and logic.
proc mdr {n} { if {$n < 0 || ![string is integer $n]} { error "must be an integer" } for {set i 0} {$n > 9} {incr i} { set n [tcl::mathop::* {*}[split $n ""]] } return [list $i $n] }
package main import "fmt" func mult(n uint64, base int) (mult uint64) { for mult = 1; mult > 0 && n > 0; n /= uint64(base) { mult *= n % uint64(base) } return } func MultDigitalRoot(n uint64, base int) (mp, mdr int) { var m uint64 for m = n; m >= uint64(base); mp++ { m = mult(m, base) } return mp, int(m...
Write a version of this Ada function in C# with identical behavior.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ada code in C.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original Ada code.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Generate a Go translation of this Ada snippet without changing its computational steps.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Ada snippet.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Convert this Ada snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Ada.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Arturo to C.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = nΒ % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Port the following code from Arturo to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = nΒ % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Arturo code in C++.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = nΒ % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Arturo code in Java.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = nΒ % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Arturo.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = nΒ % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Arturo.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = nΒ % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Arturo version.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = nΒ % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Port the provided AutoHotKey code into C while preserving the original functionality.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(...
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from AutoHotKey to C#.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(...
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(...
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Generate a Java translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(...
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from AutoHotKey to Python.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(...
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(...
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Change the programming language of this snippet from AutoHotKey to Go without modifying what it does.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(...
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Write a version of this AWK function in C with identical behavior.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Generate a C# translation of this AWK snippet without changing its computational steps.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this AWK code.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Port the provided AWK code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this AWK code in Python.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Change the programming language of this snippet from AWK to VB without modifying what it does.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Port the following code from AWK to Go with equivalent syntax and logic.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Please provide an equivalent version of this BBC_Basic code in C.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Rewrite this program in C# while keeping its functionality equivalent to the BBC_Basic version.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from BBC_Basic to C++, same semantics.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Generate an equivalent Java version of this BBC_Basic code.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in BBC_Basic.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Convert this BBC_Basic block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Port the provided BBC_Basic code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Transform the following Clojure implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Convert this Clojure snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of Clojure, keeping it the same logically?
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Clojure to Java.
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Clojure code.
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Clojure.
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Translate the given Clojure code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Port the provided Common_Lisp code into C while preserving the original functionality.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Convert this Common_Lisp block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Generate a C++ translation of this Common_Lisp snippet without changing its computational steps.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Generate a Java translation of this Common_Lisp snippet without changing its computational steps.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Port the provided Common_Lisp code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Port the provided Common_Lisp code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Convert this Common_Lisp snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Generate an equivalent C version of this D code.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Write the same code in C# as shown below in D.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this D implementation.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Translate the given D code snippet into Java without altering its behavior.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in D.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Translate the given D code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this Elixir implementation.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i,...
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Write a version of this Elixir function in C# with identical behavior.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i,...
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Port the provided Elixir code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i,...
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Elixir to Java, same semantics.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i,...
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Elixir to Python, same semantics.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i,...
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Transform the following Elixir implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i,...
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...
Convert the following code from Elixir to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i,...
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Erlang code in C.
is_perfect(X) -> X == lists:sum([N || N <- lists:seq(1,X-1), X rem N == 0]).
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } ...
Write a version of this Erlang function in C# with identical behavior.
is_perfect(X) -> X == lists:sum([N || N <- lists:seq(1,X-1), X rem N == 0]).
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i =...
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Erlang version.
is_perfect(X) -> X == lists:sum([N || N <- lists:seq(1,X-1), X rem N == 0]).
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ )...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Erlang to Java without modifying what it does.
is_perfect(X) -> X == lists:sum([N || N <- lists:seq(1,X-1), X rem N == 0]).
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Erlang code in Python.
is_perfect(X) -> X == lists:sum([N || N <- lists:seq(1,X-1), X rem N == 0]).
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Convert the following code from Erlang to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
is_perfect(X) -> X == lists:sum([N || N <- lists:seq(1,X-1), X rem N == 0]).
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors...