Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Convert this Pascal block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
program PerfectNumbers; function isPerfect(number: longint): boolean; var i, sum: longint; begin sum := 1; for i := 2 to round(sqrt(real(number))) do if (number mod i = 0) then sum := sum + i + (number div i); isPerfect := (sum = number); end; var candidate: longint; begin writeln('Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:'); for candidate := 2 to 33550337 do if isPerfect(candidate) then writeln (candidate, ' is a perfect number.'); end.
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Change the following Pascal code into Java without altering its purpose.
program PerfectNumbers; function isPerfect(number: longint): boolean; var i, sum: longint; begin sum := 1; for i := 2 to round(sqrt(real(number))) do if (number mod i = 0) then sum := sum + i + (number div i); isPerfect := (sum = number); end; var candidate: longint; begin writeln('Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:'); for candidate := 2 to 33550337 do if isPerfect(candidate) then writeln (candidate, ' is a perfect number.'); end.
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Pascal.
program PerfectNumbers; function isPerfect(number: longint): boolean; var i, sum: longint; begin sum := 1; for i := 2 to round(sqrt(real(number))) do if (number mod i = 0) then sum := sum + i + (number div i); isPerfect := (sum = number); end; var candidate: longint; begin writeln('Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:'); for candidate := 2 to 33550337 do if isPerfect(candidate) then writeln (candidate, ' is a perfect number.'); end.
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Port the following code from Pascal to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
program PerfectNumbers; function isPerfect(number: longint): boolean; var i, sum: longint; begin sum := 1; for i := 2 to round(sqrt(real(number))) do if (number mod i = 0) then sum := sum + i + (number div i); isPerfect := (sum = number); end; var candidate: longint; begin writeln('Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:'); for candidate := 2 to 33550337 do if isPerfect(candidate) then writeln (candidate, ' is a perfect number.'); end.
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Please provide an equivalent version of this Pascal code in Go.
program PerfectNumbers; function isPerfect(number: longint): boolean; var i, sum: longint; begin sum := 1; for i := 2 to round(sqrt(real(number))) do if (number mod i = 0) then sum := sum + i + (number div i); isPerfect := (sum = number); end; var candidate: longint; begin writeln('Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:'); for candidate := 2 to 33550337 do if isPerfect(candidate) then writeln (candidate, ' is a perfect number.'); end.
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Convert this Perl block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
sub perf { my $n = shift; my $sum = 0; foreach my $i (1..$n-1) { if ($n % $i == 0) { $sum += $i; } } return $sum == $n; }
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Perl.
sub perf { my $n = shift; my $sum = 0; foreach my $i (1..$n-1) { if ($n % $i == 0) { $sum += $i; } } return $sum == $n; }
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Generate a C++ translation of this Perl snippet without changing its computational steps.
sub perf { my $n = shift; my $sum = 0; foreach my $i (1..$n-1) { if ($n % $i == 0) { $sum += $i; } } return $sum == $n; }
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
sub perf { my $n = shift; my $sum = 0; foreach my $i (1..$n-1) { if ($n % $i == 0) { $sum += $i; } } return $sum == $n; }
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Perl implementation.
sub perf { my $n = shift; my $sum = 0; foreach my $i (1..$n-1) { if ($n % $i == 0) { $sum += $i; } } return $sum == $n; }
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Convert this Perl block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
sub perf { my $n = shift; my $sum = 0; foreach my $i (1..$n-1) { if ($n % $i == 0) { $sum += $i; } } return $sum == $n; }
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Perl to Go.
sub perf { my $n = shift; my $sum = 0; foreach my $i (1..$n-1) { if ($n % $i == 0) { $sum += $i; } } return $sum == $n; }
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Port the following code from PowerShell to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
Function IsPerfect($n) { $sum=0 for($i=1;$i-lt$n;$i++) { if($n%$i -eq 0) { $sum += $i } } return $sum -eq $n } Returns "True" if the given number is perfect and "False" if it's not.
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this PowerShell implementation.
Function IsPerfect($n) { $sum=0 for($i=1;$i-lt$n;$i++) { if($n%$i -eq 0) { $sum += $i } } return $sum -eq $n } Returns "True" if the given number is perfect and "False" if it's not.
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from PowerShell to C++, same semantics.
Function IsPerfect($n) { $sum=0 for($i=1;$i-lt$n;$i++) { if($n%$i -eq 0) { $sum += $i } } return $sum -eq $n } Returns "True" if the given number is perfect and "False" if it's not.
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in PowerShell.
Function IsPerfect($n) { $sum=0 for($i=1;$i-lt$n;$i++) { if($n%$i -eq 0) { $sum += $i } } return $sum -eq $n } Returns "True" if the given number is perfect and "False" if it's not.
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this PowerShell code in Python.
Function IsPerfect($n) { $sum=0 for($i=1;$i-lt$n;$i++) { if($n%$i -eq 0) { $sum += $i } } return $sum -eq $n } Returns "True" if the given number is perfect and "False" if it's not.
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
Function IsPerfect($n) { $sum=0 for($i=1;$i-lt$n;$i++) { if($n%$i -eq 0) { $sum += $i } } return $sum -eq $n } Returns "True" if the given number is perfect and "False" if it's not.
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in PowerShell.
Function IsPerfect($n) { $sum=0 for($i=1;$i-lt$n;$i++) { if($n%$i -eq 0) { $sum += $i } } return $sum -eq $n } Returns "True" if the given number is perfect and "False" if it's not.
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in R.
is.perf <- function(n){ if (n==0|n==1) return(FALSE) s <- seq (1,n-1) x <- n %% s m <- data.frame(s,x) out <- with(m, s[x==0]) return(sum(out)==n) } is.perf(28) sapply(c(6,28,496,8128,33550336),is.perf)
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in R.
is.perf <- function(n){ if (n==0|n==1) return(FALSE) s <- seq (1,n-1) x <- n %% s m <- data.frame(s,x) out <- with(m, s[x==0]) return(sum(out)==n) } is.perf(28) sapply(c(6,28,496,8128,33550336),is.perf)
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this R implementation.
is.perf <- function(n){ if (n==0|n==1) return(FALSE) s <- seq (1,n-1) x <- n %% s m <- data.frame(s,x) out <- with(m, s[x==0]) return(sum(out)==n) } is.perf(28) sapply(c(6,28,496,8128,33550336),is.perf)
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the R version.
is.perf <- function(n){ if (n==0|n==1) return(FALSE) s <- seq (1,n-1) x <- n %% s m <- data.frame(s,x) out <- with(m, s[x==0]) return(sum(out)==n) } is.perf(28) sapply(c(6,28,496,8128,33550336),is.perf)
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Transform the following R implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
is.perf <- function(n){ if (n==0|n==1) return(FALSE) s <- seq (1,n-1) x <- n %% s m <- data.frame(s,x) out <- with(m, s[x==0]) return(sum(out)==n) } is.perf(28) sapply(c(6,28,496,8128,33550336),is.perf)
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Please provide an equivalent version of this R code in VB.
is.perf <- function(n){ if (n==0|n==1) return(FALSE) s <- seq (1,n-1) x <- n %% s m <- data.frame(s,x) out <- with(m, s[x==0]) return(sum(out)==n) } is.perf(28) sapply(c(6,28,496,8128,33550336),is.perf)
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from R to Go, same semantics.
is.perf <- function(n){ if (n==0|n==1) return(FALSE) s <- seq (1,n-1) x <- n %% s m <- data.frame(s,x) out <- with(m, s[x==0]) return(sum(out)==n) } is.perf(28) sapply(c(6,28,496,8128,33550336),is.perf)
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Port the following code from Racket to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
#lang racket (require math) (define (perfect? n) (= (* n 2) (sum (divisors n)))) (filter perfect? (filter even? (range 1e5)))
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Change the following Racket code into C# without altering its purpose.
#lang racket (require math) (define (perfect? n) (= (* n 2) (sum (divisors n)))) (filter perfect? (filter even? (range 1e5)))
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Convert this Racket block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
#lang racket (require math) (define (perfect? n) (= (* n 2) (sum (divisors n)))) (filter perfect? (filter even? (range 1e5)))
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Racket, keeping it the same logically?
#lang racket (require math) (define (perfect? n) (= (* n 2) (sum (divisors n)))) (filter perfect? (filter even? (range 1e5)))
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Generate a Python translation of this Racket snippet without changing its computational steps.
#lang racket (require math) (define (perfect? n) (= (* n 2) (sum (divisors n)))) (filter perfect? (filter even? (range 1e5)))
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Convert the following code from Racket to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
#lang racket (require math) (define (perfect? n) (= (* n 2) (sum (divisors n)))) (filter perfect? (filter even? (range 1e5)))
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Please provide an equivalent version of this Racket code in Go.
#lang racket (require math) (define (perfect? n) (= (* n 2) (sum (divisors n)))) (filter perfect? (filter even? (range 1e5)))
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Change the following COBOL code into C without altering its purpose.
$set REPOSITORY "UPDATE ON" IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. perfect-main. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. REPOSITORY. FUNCTION perfect . DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 i PIC 9(8). PROCEDURE DIVISION. PERFORM VARYING i FROM 2 BY 1 UNTIL 33550337 = i IF FUNCTION perfect(i) = 0 DISPLAY i END-IF END-PERFORM GOBACK . END PROGRAM perfect-main.
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Write a version of this COBOL function in C# with identical behavior.
$set REPOSITORY "UPDATE ON" IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. perfect-main. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. REPOSITORY. FUNCTION perfect . DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 i PIC 9(8). PROCEDURE DIVISION. PERFORM VARYING i FROM 2 BY 1 UNTIL 33550337 = i IF FUNCTION perfect(i) = 0 DISPLAY i END-IF END-PERFORM GOBACK . END PROGRAM perfect-main.
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from COBOL to C++, same semantics.
$set REPOSITORY "UPDATE ON" IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. perfect-main. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. REPOSITORY. FUNCTION perfect . DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 i PIC 9(8). PROCEDURE DIVISION. PERFORM VARYING i FROM 2 BY 1 UNTIL 33550337 = i IF FUNCTION perfect(i) = 0 DISPLAY i END-IF END-PERFORM GOBACK . END PROGRAM perfect-main.
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original COBOL snippet.
$set REPOSITORY "UPDATE ON" IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. perfect-main. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. REPOSITORY. FUNCTION perfect . DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 i PIC 9(8). PROCEDURE DIVISION. PERFORM VARYING i FROM 2 BY 1 UNTIL 33550337 = i IF FUNCTION perfect(i) = 0 DISPLAY i END-IF END-PERFORM GOBACK . END PROGRAM perfect-main.
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Convert the following code from COBOL to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
$set REPOSITORY "UPDATE ON" IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. perfect-main. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. REPOSITORY. FUNCTION perfect . DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 i PIC 9(8). PROCEDURE DIVISION. PERFORM VARYING i FROM 2 BY 1 UNTIL 33550337 = i IF FUNCTION perfect(i) = 0 DISPLAY i END-IF END-PERFORM GOBACK . END PROGRAM perfect-main.
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Change the programming language of this snippet from COBOL to VB without modifying what it does.
$set REPOSITORY "UPDATE ON" IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. perfect-main. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. REPOSITORY. FUNCTION perfect . DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 i PIC 9(8). PROCEDURE DIVISION. PERFORM VARYING i FROM 2 BY 1 UNTIL 33550337 = i IF FUNCTION perfect(i) = 0 DISPLAY i END-IF END-PERFORM GOBACK . END PROGRAM perfect-main.
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in COBOL.
$set REPOSITORY "UPDATE ON" IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. perfect-main. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. REPOSITORY. FUNCTION perfect . DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 i PIC 9(8). PROCEDURE DIVISION. PERFORM VARYING i FROM 2 BY 1 UNTIL 33550337 = i IF FUNCTION perfect(i) = 0 DISPLAY i END-IF END-PERFORM GOBACK . END PROGRAM perfect-main.
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Translate the given REXX code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
-- first perfect number over 10000 is 33550336...let's not be crazy loop i = 1 to 10000 if perfectNumber(i) then say i "is a perfect number" end ::routine perfectNumber use strict arg n sum = 0 -- the largest possible factor is n % 2, so no point in -- going higher than that loop i = 1 to n % 2 if n // i == 0 then sum += i end return sum = n
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from REXX to C#.
-- first perfect number over 10000 is 33550336...let's not be crazy loop i = 1 to 10000 if perfectNumber(i) then say i "is a perfect number" end ::routine perfectNumber use strict arg n sum = 0 -- the largest possible factor is n % 2, so no point in -- going higher than that loop i = 1 to n % 2 if n // i == 0 then sum += i end return sum = n
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in REXX.
-- first perfect number over 10000 is 33550336...let's not be crazy loop i = 1 to 10000 if perfectNumber(i) then say i "is a perfect number" end ::routine perfectNumber use strict arg n sum = 0 -- the largest possible factor is n % 2, so no point in -- going higher than that loop i = 1 to n % 2 if n // i == 0 then sum += i end return sum = n
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Port the provided REXX code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
-- first perfect number over 10000 is 33550336...let's not be crazy loop i = 1 to 10000 if perfectNumber(i) then say i "is a perfect number" end ::routine perfectNumber use strict arg n sum = 0 -- the largest possible factor is n % 2, so no point in -- going higher than that loop i = 1 to n % 2 if n // i == 0 then sum += i end return sum = n
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original REXX snippet.
-- first perfect number over 10000 is 33550336...let's not be crazy loop i = 1 to 10000 if perfectNumber(i) then say i "is a perfect number" end ::routine perfectNumber use strict arg n sum = 0 -- the largest possible factor is n % 2, so no point in -- going higher than that loop i = 1 to n % 2 if n // i == 0 then sum += i end return sum = n
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Change the programming language of this snippet from REXX to VB without modifying what it does.
-- first perfect number over 10000 is 33550336...let's not be crazy loop i = 1 to 10000 if perfectNumber(i) then say i "is a perfect number" end ::routine perfectNumber use strict arg n sum = 0 -- the largest possible factor is n % 2, so no point in -- going higher than that loop i = 1 to n % 2 if n // i == 0 then sum += i end return sum = n
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Convert this REXX block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
-- first perfect number over 10000 is 33550336...let's not be crazy loop i = 1 to 10000 if perfectNumber(i) then say i "is a perfect number" end ::routine perfectNumber use strict arg n sum = 0 -- the largest possible factor is n % 2, so no point in -- going higher than that loop i = 1 to n % 2 if n // i == 0 then sum += i end return sum = n
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ruby to C.
def perf(n) sum = 0 for i in 1...n sum += i if n % i == 0 end sum == n end
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Convert the following code from Ruby to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
def perf(n) sum = 0 for i in 1...n sum += i if n % i == 0 end sum == n end
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Ruby snippet.
def perf(n) sum = 0 for i in 1...n sum += i if n % i == 0 end sum == n end
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
def perf(n) sum = 0 for i in 1...n sum += i if n % i == 0 end sum == n end
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Convert this Ruby snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
def perf(n) sum = 0 for i in 1...n sum += i if n % i == 0 end sum == n end
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Ruby snippet.
def perf(n) sum = 0 for i in 1...n sum += i if n % i == 0 end sum == n end
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Scala to C without modifying what it does.
fun isPerfect(n: Int): Boolean = when { n < 2 -> false n % 2 == 1 -> false else -> { var tot = 1 var q: Int for (i in 2 .. Math.sqrt(n.toDouble()).toInt()) { if (n % i == 0) { tot += i q = n / i if (q > i) tot += q } } n == tot } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("The first five perfect numbers are:") for (i in 2 .. 33550336) if (isPerfect(i)) print("$i ") }
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Scala to C# without modifying what it does.
fun isPerfect(n: Int): Boolean = when { n < 2 -> false n % 2 == 1 -> false else -> { var tot = 1 var q: Int for (i in 2 .. Math.sqrt(n.toDouble()).toInt()) { if (n % i == 0) { tot += i q = n / i if (q > i) tot += q } } n == tot } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("The first five perfect numbers are:") for (i in 2 .. 33550336) if (isPerfect(i)) print("$i ") }
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Write a version of this Scala function in C++ with identical behavior.
fun isPerfect(n: Int): Boolean = when { n < 2 -> false n % 2 == 1 -> false else -> { var tot = 1 var q: Int for (i in 2 .. Math.sqrt(n.toDouble()).toInt()) { if (n % i == 0) { tot += i q = n / i if (q > i) tot += q } } n == tot } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("The first five perfect numbers are:") for (i in 2 .. 33550336) if (isPerfect(i)) print("$i ") }
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Convert the following code from Scala to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
fun isPerfect(n: Int): Boolean = when { n < 2 -> false n % 2 == 1 -> false else -> { var tot = 1 var q: Int for (i in 2 .. Math.sqrt(n.toDouble()).toInt()) { if (n % i == 0) { tot += i q = n / i if (q > i) tot += q } } n == tot } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("The first five perfect numbers are:") for (i in 2 .. 33550336) if (isPerfect(i)) print("$i ") }
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to Python, same semantics.
fun isPerfect(n: Int): Boolean = when { n < 2 -> false n % 2 == 1 -> false else -> { var tot = 1 var q: Int for (i in 2 .. Math.sqrt(n.toDouble()).toInt()) { if (n % i == 0) { tot += i q = n / i if (q > i) tot += q } } n == tot } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("The first five perfect numbers are:") for (i in 2 .. 33550336) if (isPerfect(i)) print("$i ") }
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Port the provided Scala code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
fun isPerfect(n: Int): Boolean = when { n < 2 -> false n % 2 == 1 -> false else -> { var tot = 1 var q: Int for (i in 2 .. Math.sqrt(n.toDouble()).toInt()) { if (n % i == 0) { tot += i q = n / i if (q > i) tot += q } } n == tot } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("The first five perfect numbers are:") for (i in 2 .. 33550336) if (isPerfect(i)) print("$i ") }
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Scala version.
fun isPerfect(n: Int): Boolean = when { n < 2 -> false n % 2 == 1 -> false else -> { var tot = 1 var q: Int for (i in 2 .. Math.sqrt(n.toDouble()).toInt()) { if (n % i == 0) { tot += i q = n / i if (q > i) tot += q } } n == tot } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("The first five perfect numbers are:") for (i in 2 .. 33550336) if (isPerfect(i)) print("$i ") }
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Swift to C without modifying what it does.
func perfect(n:Int) -> Bool { var sum = 0 for i in 1..<n { if n % i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } for i in 1..<10000 { if perfect(i) { println(i) } }
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Swift code in C#.
func perfect(n:Int) -> Bool { var sum = 0 for i in 1..<n { if n % i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } for i in 1..<10000 { if perfect(i) { println(i) } }
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
func perfect(n:Int) -> Bool { var sum = 0 for i in 1..<n { if n % i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } for i in 1..<10000 { if perfect(i) { println(i) } }
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in Swift.
func perfect(n:Int) -> Bool { var sum = 0 for i in 1..<n { if n % i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } for i in 1..<10000 { if perfect(i) { println(i) } }
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Swift to Python, same semantics.
func perfect(n:Int) -> Bool { var sum = 0 for i in 1..<n { if n % i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } for i in 1..<10000 { if perfect(i) { println(i) } }
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Transform the following Swift implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
func perfect(n:Int) -> Bool { var sum = 0 for i in 1..<n { if n % i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } for i in 1..<10000 { if perfect(i) { println(i) } }
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Generate a Go translation of this Swift snippet without changing its computational steps.
func perfect(n:Int) -> Bool { var sum = 0 for i in 1..<n { if n % i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } for i in 1..<10000 { if perfect(i) { println(i) } }
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Tcl.
proc perfect n { set sum 0 for {set i 1} {$i <= $n} {incr i} { if {$n % $i == 0} {incr sum $i} } expr {$sum == 2*$n} }
#include "stdio.h" #include "math.h" int perfect(int n) { int max = (int)sqrt((double)n) + 1; int tot = 1; int i; for (i = 2; i < max; i++) if ( (n % i) == 0 ) { tot += i; int q = n / i; if (q > i) tot += q; } return tot == n; } int main() { int n; for (n = 2; n < 33550337; n++) if (perfect(n)) printf("%d\n", n); return 0; }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Tcl.
proc perfect n { set sum 0 for {set i 1} {$i <= $n} {incr i} { if {$n % $i == 0} {incr sum $i} } expr {$sum == 2*$n} }
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:"); for (int x = 0; x < 33550337; x++) { if (IsPerfect(x)) Console.WriteLine(x + " is perfect."); } Console.ReadLine(); } static bool IsPerfect(int num) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 1; i < num; i++) { if (num % i == 0) sum += i; } return sum == num ; }
Write a version of this Tcl function in C++ with identical behavior.
proc perfect n { set sum 0 for {set i 1} {$i <= $n} {incr i} { if {$n % $i == 0} {incr sum $i} } expr {$sum == 2*$n} }
#include <iostream> using namespace std ; int divisor_sum( int number ) { int sum = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i < number ; i++ ) if ( number % i == 0 ) sum += i ; return sum; } int main( ) { cout << "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:\n" ; for ( int num = 1 ; num < 33550337 ; num++ ) { if (divisor_sum(num) == num) cout << num << '\n' ; } return 0 ; }
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into Java without altering its behavior.
proc perfect n { set sum 0 for {set i 1} {$i <= $n} {incr i} { if {$n % $i == 0} {incr sum $i} } expr {$sum == 2*$n} }
public static boolean perf(int n){ int sum= 0; for(int i= 1;i < n;i++){ if(n % i == 0){ sum+= i; } } return sum == n; }
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Tcl version.
proc perfect n { set sum 0 for {set i 1} {$i <= $n} {incr i} { if {$n % $i == 0} {incr sum $i} } expr {$sum == 2*$n} }
def perf1(n): sum = 0 for i in range(1, n): if n % i == 0: sum += i return sum == n
Convert this Tcl snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
proc perfect n { set sum 0 for {set i 1} {$i <= $n} {incr i} { if {$n % $i == 0} {incr sum $i} } expr {$sum == 2*$n} }
Private Function Factors(x As Long) As String Application.Volatile Dim i As Long Dim cooresponding_factors As String Factors = 1 corresponding_factors = x For i = 2 To Sqr(x) If x Mod i = 0 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & i If i <> x / i Then corresponding_factors = x / i & ", " & corresponding_factors End If Next i If x <> 1 Then Factors = Factors & ", " & corresponding_factors End Function Private Function is_perfect(n As Long) fs = Split(Factors(n), ", ") Dim f() As Long ReDim f(UBound(fs)) For i = 0 To UBound(fs) f(i) = Val(fs(i)) Next i is_perfect = WorksheetFunction.Sum(f) - n = n End Function Public Sub main() Dim i As Long For i = 2 To 100000 If is_perfect(i) Then Debug.Print i Next i End Sub
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Tcl, keeping it the same logically?
proc perfect n { set sum 0 for {set i 1} {$i <= $n} {incr i} { if {$n % $i == 0} {incr sum $i} } expr {$sum == 2*$n} }
package main import "fmt" func computePerfect(n int64) bool { var sum int64 for i := int64(1); i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { sum += i } } return sum == n } func isPerfect(n int64) bool { switch n { case 6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328, 2305843008139952128: return true } return false } func main() { for n := int64(1); ; n++ { if isPerfect(n) != computePerfect(n) { panic("bug") } if n%1e3 == 0 { fmt.Println("tested", n) } } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in PHP instead of Rust, keeping it the same logically?
fn main ( ) { fn factor_sum(n: i32) -> i32 { let mut v = Vec::new(); for x in 1..n-1 { if n%x == 0 { v.push(x); } } let mut sum = v.iter().sum(); return sum; } fn perfect_nums(n: i32) { for x in 2..n { if factor_sum(x) == x { println!("{} is a perfect number.", x); } } } perfect_nums(10000); }
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Transform the following Ada implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
function Is_Perfect(N : Positive) return Boolean is Sum : Natural := 0; begin for I in 1..N - 1 loop if N mod I = 0 then Sum := Sum + I; end if; end loop; return Sum = N; end Is_Perfect;
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Generate an equivalent PHP version of this Arturo code.
divisors: $[n][ select 1..(n/2)+1 'i -> 0 = n % i ] perfect?: $[n][ n = sum divisors n ] loop 2..1000 'i [ if perfect? i -> print i ]
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in AutoHotKey.
Loop, 30 { If isMersennePrime(A_Index + 1) res .= "Perfect number: " perfectNum(A_Index + 1) "`n" } MsgBox % res perfectNum(N) { Return 2**(N - 1) * (2**N - 1) } isMersennePrime(N) { If (isPrime(N)) && (isPrime(2**N - 1)) Return true } isPrime(N) { Loop, % Floor(Sqrt(N)) If (A_Index > 1 && !Mod(N, A_Index)) Return false Return true }
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Ensure the translated PHP code behaves exactly like the original AWK snippet.
$ awk 'func perf(n){s=0;for(i=1;i<n;i++)if(n%i==0)s+=i;return(s==n)} BEGIN{for(i=1;i<10000;i++)if(perf(i))print i}' 6 28 496 8128
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Rewrite the snippet below in PHP so it works the same as the original BBC_Basic code.
FOR n% = 2 TO 10000 STEP 2 IF FNperfect(n%) PRINT n% NEXT END DEF FNperfect(N%) LOCAL I%, S% S% = 1 FOR I% = 2 TO SQR(N%)-1 IF N% MOD I% = 0 S% += I% + N% DIV I% NEXT IF I% = SQR(N%) S% += I% = (N% = S%)
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Convert this Clojure block to PHP, preserving its control flow and logic.
(defn proper-divisors [n] (if (< n 4) [1] (->> (range 2 (inc (quot n 2))) (filter #(zero? (rem n %))) (cons 1)))) (defn perfect? [n] (= (reduce + (proper-divisors n)) n))
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in PHP.
(defun perfectp (n) (= n (loop for i from 1 below n when (= 0 (mod n i)) sum i)))
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in D.
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.range; bool isPerfectNumber1(in uint n) pure nothrow in { assert(n > 0); } body { return n == iota(1, n - 1).filter!(i => n % i == 0).sum; } void main() { iota(1, 10_000).filter!isPerfectNumber1.writeln; }
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Generate an equivalent PHP version of this Elixir code.
defmodule RC do def is_perfect(1), do: false def is_perfect(n) when n > 1 do Enum.sum(factor(n, 2, [1])) == n end defp factor(n, i, factors) when n < i*i , do: factors defp factor(n, i, factors) when n == i*i , do: [i | factors] defp factor(n, i, factors) when rem(n,i)==0, do: factor(n, i+1, [i, div(n,i) | factors]) defp factor(n, i, factors) , do: factor(n, i+1, factors) end IO.inspect (for i <- 1..10000, RC.is_perfect(i), do: i)
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Write the same algorithm in PHP as shown in this Erlang implementation.
is_perfect(X) -> X == lists:sum([N || N <- lists:seq(1,X-1), X rem N == 0]).
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Port the provided F# code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
let perf n = n = List.fold (+) 0 (List.filter (fun i -> n % i = 0) [1..(n-1)]) for i in 1..10000 do if (perf i) then printfn "%i is perfect" i
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Factor to PHP, same semantics.
USING: kernel math math.primes.factors sequences ; IN: rosettacode.perfect-numbers : perfect? ( n -- ? ) [ divisors sum ] [ 2 * ] bi = ;
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Transform the following Forth implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
: perfect? 1 over 2/ 1+ 2 ?do over i mod 0= if i + then loop = ;
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Port the provided Fortran code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
FUNCTION isPerfect(n) LOGICAL :: isPerfect INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: n INTEGER :: i, factorsum isPerfect = .FALSE. factorsum = 1 DO i = 2, INT(SQRT(REAL(n))) IF(MOD(n, i) == 0) factorsum = factorsum + i + (n / i) END DO IF (factorsum == n) isPerfect = .TRUE. END FUNCTION isPerfect
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in Groovy.
def isPerfect = { n -> n > 4 && (n == (2..Math.sqrt(n)).findAll { n % it == 0 }.inject(1) { factorSum, i -> factorSum += i + n/i }) }
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Port the provided Haskell code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
perfect n = n == sum [i | i <- [1..n-1], n `mod` i == 0]
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Rewrite the snippet below in PHP so it works the same as the original Icon code.
procedure main(arglist) limit := \arglist[1] | 100000 write("Perfect numbers from 1 to ",limit,":") every write(isperfect(1 to limit)) write("Done.") end procedure isperfect(n) local sum,i every (sum := 0) +:= (n ~= divisors(n)) if sum = n then return n end link factors
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Change the following J code into PHP without altering its purpose.
is_perfect=: +: = >:@#.~/.~&.q:@(6>.<.)
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Port the provided Julia code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
isperfect(n::Integer) = n == sum([n % i == 0 ? i : 0 for i = 1:(n - 1)]) perfects(n::Integer) = filter(isperfect, 1:n) @show perfects(10000)
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Write the same code in PHP as shown below in Lua.
function isPerfect(x) local sum = 0 for i = 1, x-1 do sum = (x % i) == 0 and sum + i or sum end return sum == x end
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in Mathematica.
PerfectQ[i_Integer] := Total[Divisors[i]] == 2 i
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Ensure the translated PHP code behaves exactly like the original MATLAB snippet.
function perf = isPerfect(n) total = 0; for k = 1:n-1 if ~mod(n, k) total = total+k; end end perf = total == n; end
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Change the following Nim code into PHP without altering its purpose.
import math proc isPerfect(n: int): bool = var sum: int = 1 for d in 2 .. int(n.toFloat.sqrt): if n mod d == 0: inc sum, d let q = n div d if q != d: inc sum, q result = n == sum for n in 2..10_000: if n.isPerfect: echo n
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in PHP.
let perf n = let sum = ref 0 in for i = 1 to n-1 do if n mod i = 0 then sum := !sum + i done; !sum = n
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }
Rewrite the snippet below in PHP so it works the same as the original Pascal code.
program PerfectNumbers; function isPerfect(number: longint): boolean; var i, sum: longint; begin sum := 1; for i := 2 to round(sqrt(real(number))) do if (number mod i = 0) then sum := sum + i + (number div i); isPerfect := (sum = number); end; var candidate: longint; begin writeln('Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:'); for candidate := 2 to 33550337 do if isPerfect(candidate) then writeln (candidate, ' is a perfect number.'); end.
function is_perfect($number) { $sum = 0; for($i = 1; $i < $number; $i++) { if($number % $i == 0) $sum += $i; } return $sum == $number; } echo "Perfect numbers from 1 to 33550337:" . PHP_EOL; for($num = 1; $num < 33550337; $num++) { if(is_perfect($num)) echo $num . PHP_EOL; }