Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Mathematica.
Extra = "little"; StringReplace["Mary had a X lamb.", {"X" -> Extra}] ->"Mary had a little lamb."
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Port the provided Mathematica code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
Extra = "little"; StringReplace["Mary had a X lamb.", {"X" -> Extra}] ->"Mary had a little lamb."
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Convert this Mathematica block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
Extra = "little"; StringReplace["Mary had a X lamb.", {"X" -> Extra}] ->"Mary had a little lamb."
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
import strutils var str = "little" echo "Mary had a $ echo "Mary had a $
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Nim.
import strutils var str = "little" echo "Mary had a $ echo "Mary had a $
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Nim.
import strutils var str = "little" echo "Mary had a $ echo "Mary had a $
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
import strutils var str = "little" echo "Mary had a $ echo "Mary had a $
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in Nim.
import strutils var str = "little" echo "Mary had a $ echo "Mary had a $
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Ensure the translated VB code behaves exactly like the original Nim snippet.
import strutils var str = "little" echo "Mary had a $ echo "Mary had a $
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Transform the following Nim implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
import strutils var str = "little" echo "Mary had a $ echo "Mary had a $
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Port the provided OCaml code into C while preserving the original functionality.
let extra = "little" in Printf.printf "Mary had a %s lamb." extra
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from OCaml to C#.
let extra = "little" in Printf.printf "Mary had a %s lamb." extra
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original OCaml code.
let extra = "little" in Printf.printf "Mary had a %s lamb." extra
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original OCaml code.
let extra = "little" in Printf.printf "Mary had a %s lamb." extra
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of OCaml, keeping it the same logically?
let extra = "little" in Printf.printf "Mary had a %s lamb." extra
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of OCaml, keeping it the same logically?
let extra = "little" in Printf.printf "Mary had a %s lamb." extra
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Generate a Go translation of this OCaml snippet without changing its computational steps.
let extra = "little" in Printf.printf "Mary had a %s lamb." extra
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Perl code.
$extra = "little"; print "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf "Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra;
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Perl.
$extra = "little"; print "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf "Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra;
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Convert the following code from Perl to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
$extra = "little"; print "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf "Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra;
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
$extra = "little"; print "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf "Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra;
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Change the following Perl code into Python without altering its purpose.
$extra = "little"; print "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf "Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra;
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Perl, keeping it the same logically?
$extra = "little"; print "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf "Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra;
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Perl.
$extra = "little"; print "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf "Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra;
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Convert this PowerShell snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
$extra = "little" "Mary had a {0} lamb." -f $extra
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this PowerShell implementation.
$extra = "little" "Mary had a {0} lamb." -f $extra
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from PowerShell to C++.
$extra = "little" "Mary had a {0} lamb." -f $extra
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Convert this PowerShell block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
$extra = "little" "Mary had a {0} lamb." -f $extra
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Generate a Python translation of this PowerShell snippet without changing its computational steps.
$extra = "little" "Mary had a {0} lamb." -f $extra
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the PowerShell version.
$extra = "little" "Mary had a {0} lamb." -f $extra
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Generate a Go translation of this PowerShell snippet without changing its computational steps.
$extra = "little" "Mary had a {0} lamb." -f $extra
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Translate the given Racket code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
#lang racket (format "Mary had a ~a lamb" "little")
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Write a version of this Racket function in C# with identical behavior.
#lang racket (format "Mary had a ~a lamb" "little")
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Racket.
#lang racket (format "Mary had a ~a lamb" "little")
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Transform the following Racket implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
#lang racket (format "Mary had a ~a lamb" "little")
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Port the following code from Racket to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
#lang racket (format "Mary had a ~a lamb" "little")
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Racket.
#lang racket (format "Mary had a ~a lamb" "little")
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Change the following Racket code into Go without altering its purpose.
#lang racket (format "Mary had a ~a lamb" "little")
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Write the same code in C as shown below in COBOL.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. interpolation-included. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 extra PIC X(6) VALUE "little". PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY FUNCTION SUBSTITUTE("Mary had a X lamb.", "X", extra) GOBACK .
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Write a version of this COBOL function in C# with identical behavior.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. interpolation-included. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 extra PIC X(6) VALUE "little". PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY FUNCTION SUBSTITUTE("Mary had a X lamb.", "X", extra) GOBACK .
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from COBOL to C++ without modifying what it does.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. interpolation-included. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 extra PIC X(6) VALUE "little". PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY FUNCTION SUBSTITUTE("Mary had a X lamb.", "X", extra) GOBACK .
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Generate a Java translation of this COBOL snippet without changing its computational steps.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. interpolation-included. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 extra PIC X(6) VALUE "little". PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY FUNCTION SUBSTITUTE("Mary had a X lamb.", "X", extra) GOBACK .
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original COBOL snippet.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. interpolation-included. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 extra PIC X(6) VALUE "little". PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY FUNCTION SUBSTITUTE("Mary had a X lamb.", "X", extra) GOBACK .
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from COBOL to VB, same semantics.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. interpolation-included. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 extra PIC X(6) VALUE "little". PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY FUNCTION SUBSTITUTE("Mary had a X lamb.", "X", extra) GOBACK .
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Generate a Go translation of this COBOL snippet without changing its computational steps.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. interpolation-included. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 extra PIC X(6) VALUE "little". PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY FUNCTION SUBSTITUTE("Mary had a X lamb.", "X", extra) GOBACK .
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Port the provided REXX code into C while preserving the original functionality.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols import java.text.MessageFormat import java.text.FieldPosition useBif() useMessageFormat() return method useBif public static st = "Mary had a %1$ lamb." si = 'little' say st.changestr('%1$', si) return method useMessageFormat public static result = StringBuffer('') args = Object [ - Object Integer(7), - Object Date(), - Object 'a disturbance in the Force' - ] msgfmt = MessageFormat('At {1, time} on {1, date}, there was {2} on planet {0, number, integer}.') result = msgfmt.format(args, result, FieldPosition(0)) say result return
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols import java.text.MessageFormat import java.text.FieldPosition useBif() useMessageFormat() return method useBif public static st = "Mary had a %1$ lamb." si = 'little' say st.changestr('%1$', si) return method useMessageFormat public static result = StringBuffer('') args = Object [ - Object Integer(7), - Object Date(), - Object 'a disturbance in the Force' - ] msgfmt = MessageFormat('At {1, time} on {1, date}, there was {2} on planet {0, number, integer}.') result = msgfmt.format(args, result, FieldPosition(0)) say result return
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols import java.text.MessageFormat import java.text.FieldPosition useBif() useMessageFormat() return method useBif public static st = "Mary had a %1$ lamb." si = 'little' say st.changestr('%1$', si) return method useMessageFormat public static result = StringBuffer('') args = Object [ - Object Integer(7), - Object Date(), - Object 'a disturbance in the Force' - ] msgfmt = MessageFormat('At {1, time} on {1, date}, there was {2} on planet {0, number, integer}.') result = msgfmt.format(args, result, FieldPosition(0)) say result return
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Transform the following REXX implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols import java.text.MessageFormat import java.text.FieldPosition useBif() useMessageFormat() return method useBif public static st = "Mary had a %1$ lamb." si = 'little' say st.changestr('%1$', si) return method useMessageFormat public static result = StringBuffer('') args = Object [ - Object Integer(7), - Object Date(), - Object 'a disturbance in the Force' - ] msgfmt = MessageFormat('At {1, time} on {1, date}, there was {2} on planet {0, number, integer}.') result = msgfmt.format(args, result, FieldPosition(0)) say result return
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Port the provided REXX code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols import java.text.MessageFormat import java.text.FieldPosition useBif() useMessageFormat() return method useBif public static st = "Mary had a %1$ lamb." si = 'little' say st.changestr('%1$', si) return method useMessageFormat public static result = StringBuffer('') args = Object [ - Object Integer(7), - Object Date(), - Object 'a disturbance in the Force' - ] msgfmt = MessageFormat('At {1, time} on {1, date}, there was {2} on planet {0, number, integer}.') result = msgfmt.format(args, result, FieldPosition(0)) say result return
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols import java.text.MessageFormat import java.text.FieldPosition useBif() useMessageFormat() return method useBif public static st = "Mary had a %1$ lamb." si = 'little' say st.changestr('%1$', si) return method useMessageFormat public static result = StringBuffer('') args = Object [ - Object Integer(7), - Object Date(), - Object 'a disturbance in the Force' - ] msgfmt = MessageFormat('At {1, time} on {1, date}, there was {2} on planet {0, number, integer}.') result = msgfmt.format(args, result, FieldPosition(0)) say result return
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Write the same code in Go as shown below in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols import java.text.MessageFormat import java.text.FieldPosition useBif() useMessageFormat() return method useBif public static st = "Mary had a %1$ lamb." si = 'little' say st.changestr('%1$', si) return method useMessageFormat public static result = StringBuffer('') args = Object [ - Object Integer(7), - Object Date(), - Object 'a disturbance in the Force' - ] msgfmt = MessageFormat('At {1, time} on {1, date}, there was {2} on planet {0, number, integer}.') result = msgfmt.format(args, result, FieldPosition(0)) say result return
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
irb(main):001:0> extra = 'little' => "little" irb(main):002:0> "Mary had a => "Mary had a little lamb." irb(main):003:0> "Mary had a %s lamb." % extra => "Mary had a little lamb."
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Write a version of this Ruby function in C# with identical behavior.
irb(main):001:0> extra = 'little' => "little" irb(main):002:0> "Mary had a => "Mary had a little lamb." irb(main):003:0> "Mary had a %s lamb." % extra => "Mary had a little lamb."
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Ruby implementation.
irb(main):001:0> extra = 'little' => "little" irb(main):002:0> "Mary had a => "Mary had a little lamb." irb(main):003:0> "Mary had a %s lamb." % extra => "Mary had a little lamb."
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Ruby.
irb(main):001:0> extra = 'little' => "little" irb(main):002:0> "Mary had a => "Mary had a little lamb." irb(main):003:0> "Mary had a %s lamb." % extra => "Mary had a little lamb."
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Ruby version.
irb(main):001:0> extra = 'little' => "little" irb(main):002:0> "Mary had a => "Mary had a little lamb." irb(main):003:0> "Mary had a %s lamb." % extra => "Mary had a little lamb."
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Translate the given Ruby code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
irb(main):001:0> extra = 'little' => "little" irb(main):002:0> "Mary had a => "Mary had a little lamb." irb(main):003:0> "Mary had a %s lamb." % extra => "Mary had a little lamb."
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Transform the following Ruby implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
irb(main):001:0> extra = 'little' => "little" irb(main):002:0> "Mary had a => "Mary had a little lamb." irb(main):003:0> "Mary had a %s lamb." % extra => "Mary had a little lamb."
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Scala code in C.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { val s = "little" println("Mary had a $s lamb") println("Mary had a ${s.toUpperCase()} lamb") println("Mary had a ${s}r lamb") }
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Generate a C# translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { val s = "little" println("Mary had a $s lamb") println("Mary had a ${s.toUpperCase()} lamb") println("Mary had a ${s}r lamb") }
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of Scala, keeping it the same logically?
fun main(args: Array<String>) { val s = "little" println("Mary had a $s lamb") println("Mary had a ${s.toUpperCase()} lamb") println("Mary had a ${s}r lamb") }
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to Java, same semantics.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { val s = "little" println("Mary had a $s lamb") println("Mary had a ${s.toUpperCase()} lamb") println("Mary had a ${s}r lamb") }
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Generate a Python translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { val s = "little" println("Mary had a $s lamb") println("Mary had a ${s.toUpperCase()} lamb") println("Mary had a ${s}r lamb") }
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Scala.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { val s = "little" println("Mary had a $s lamb") println("Mary had a ${s.toUpperCase()} lamb") println("Mary had a ${s}r lamb") }
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Change the programming language of this snippet from Scala to Go without modifying what it does.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { val s = "little" println("Mary had a $s lamb") println("Mary had a ${s.toUpperCase()} lamb") println("Mary had a ${s}r lamb") }
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Generate an equivalent C version of this Swift code.
let extra = "little" println("Mary had a \(extra) lamb.")
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original Swift code.
let extra = "little" println("Mary had a \(extra) lamb.")
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
let extra = "little" println("Mary had a \(extra) lamb.")
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Generate a Java translation of this Swift snippet without changing its computational steps.
let extra = "little" println("Mary had a \(extra) lamb.")
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Port the following code from Swift to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
let extra = "little" println("Mary had a \(extra) lamb.")
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Convert this Swift snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
let extra = "little" println("Mary had a \(extra) lamb.")
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Swift, keeping it the same logically?
let extra = "little" println("Mary had a \(extra) lamb.")
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
set size "little" puts "Mary had a $size lamb." proc RandomWord {args} { lindex $args [expr {int(rand()*[llength $args])}] } puts "Mary had a [RandomWord little big] lamb."
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Port the following code from Tcl to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
set size "little" puts "Mary had a $size lamb." proc RandomWord {args} { lindex $args [expr {int(rand()*[llength $args])}] } puts "Mary had a [RandomWord little big] lamb."
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this Tcl code.
set size "little" puts "Mary had a $size lamb." proc RandomWord {args} { lindex $args [expr {int(rand()*[llength $args])}] } puts "Mary had a [RandomWord little big] lamb."
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << newString << " \n" ; return 0 ; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
set size "little" puts "Mary had a $size lamb." proc RandomWord {args} { lindex $args [expr {int(rand()*[llength $args])}] } puts "Mary had a [RandomWord little big] lamb."
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Change the programming language of this snippet from Tcl to Python without modifying what it does.
set size "little" puts "Mary had a $size lamb." proc RandomWord {args} { lindex $args [expr {int(rand()*[llength $args])}] } puts "Mary had a [RandomWord little big] lamb."
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Tcl.
set size "little" puts "Mary had a $size lamb." proc RandomWord {args} { lindex $args [expr {int(rand()*[llength $args])}] } puts "Mary had a [RandomWord little big] lamb."
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Convert this Tcl snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent.
set size "little" puts "Mary had a $size lamb." proc RandomWord {args} { lindex $args [expr {int(rand()*[llength $args])}] } puts "Mary had a [RandomWord little big] lamb."
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Port the following code from Rust to PHP with equivalent syntax and logic.
fn main() { println!("Mary had a {} lamb", "little"); println!("{1} had a {0} lamb", "little", "Mary"); println!("{name} had a {adj} lamb", adj="little", name="Mary"); }
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Generate a PHP translation of this Ada snippet without changing its computational steps.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slice ( Original, Index, Index + Tbr'Length - 1, New_Str)); end String_Replace;
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in Arturo.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Ensure the translated PHP code behaves exactly like the original AutoHotKey snippet.
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Port the provided AWK code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Convert this Common_Lisp block to PHP, preserving its control flow and logic.
(let [little "little"] (println (format "Mary had a %s lamb." little)))
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Port the provided D code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.string; "Mary had a %s lamb.".format("little").writeln; "Mary had a %2$s %1$s lamb.".format("little", "white").writeln; }
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Transform the following Delphi implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
program Project1; uses System.SysUtils; var Template : string; Marker : string; Description : string; Value : integer; Output : string; begin Template := 'Mary had a X lamb.'; Marker := 'X'; Description := 'little'; Output := StringReplace(Template, Marker, Description, [rfReplaceAll, rfIgnoreCase]); writeln(Output); Template := 'Mary had a %s lamb.'; Description := 'little'; Output := format(Template,[Description]); writeln(Output); Template := 'Mary had a %s lamb. It was worth $%d.'; Description := 'little'; Value := 20; Output := format(Template,[Description, Value]); writeln(Output); end.
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Ensure the translated PHP code behaves exactly like the original Elixir snippet.
x = "little" IO.puts "Mary had a
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Generate an equivalent PHP version of this F# code.
let lambType = "little" printfn "Mary had a %s lamb." lambType
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Change the programming language of this snippet from Factor to PHP without modifying what it does.
USE: formatting SYMBOL: little "little" little set little get "Mary had a %s lamb" sprintf
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Port the provided Forth code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
variable 'src variable #src variable 'out variable #out : Replace~ dup [char] ~ = if 'out @ 1+ #out @ type drop else emit then ; : format 0 begin dup #src @ u< while 1+ dup 'src @ + c@ replace~ repeat ; Here 'src ! ," Mary had a ~ lamb" here 'src @ - #src ! page cr ." Original  : " 'src @ 1+ #src @ type cr ." 1st Replacement : " here 'out ! ," little" here 'out @ - #out ! format cr ." 2nd Replacement : " here 'out ! ," BIG" here 'out @ - #out ! format
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Change the following Fortran code into PHP without altering its purpose.
program interpolate write (*,*) trim(inter("Mary had a X lamb.","X","little")) contains elemental function inter(string,place,ins) result(new) character(len=*), intent(in) :: string,place,ins character(len=len(string)+max(0,len(ins)-len(place))) :: new integer :: idx idx = index(string,place) if ( idx == 0 ) then new = string else new = string(1:idx-1)//ins//string(idx+len(place):len(string)) end if end function inter end program interpolate
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Rewrite this program in PHP while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Groovy version.
def adj = 'little' assert 'Mary had a little lamb.' == "Mary had a ${adj} lamb."
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Convert this Haskell block to PHP, preserving its control flow and logic.
import Text.Printf main = printf "Mary had a %s lamb\n" "little"
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Generate a PHP translation of this Icon snippet without changing its computational steps.
s2 := "humongous" s3 := "little" s1 := "Mary had a humongous lamb." s1 ?:= tab(find(s2)) || (=s2,s3) || tab(0) while s1 ?:= tab(find(s2)) || (=s2,s3) || tab(0)
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Generate an equivalent PHP version of this J code.
require 'printf' 'Mary had a %s lamb.' sprintf <'little' Mary had a little lamb. require 'strings' ('%s';'little') stringreplace 'Mary had a %s lamb.' Mary had a little lamb. 'Mary had a %s lamb.' rplc '%s';'little' Mary had a little lamb.
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Write the same code in PHP as shown below in Julia.
X = "little" "Mary had a $X lamb"
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Generate an equivalent PHP version of this Lua code.
str = string.gsub( "Mary had a X lamb.", "X", "little" ) print( str )
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>
Transform the following Mathematica implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
Extra = "little"; StringReplace["Mary had a X lamb.", {"X" -> Extra}] ->"Mary had a little lamb."
<?php $extra = 'little'; echo "Mary had a $extra lamb.\n"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", $extra); ?>