Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Pascal, keeping it the same logically?
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Transform the following Pascal implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Pascal snippet.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Convert this Pascal snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Pascal code in Java.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Pascal code in Java.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Generate a Python translation of this Pascal snippet without changing its computational steps.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Port the following code from Pascal to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Port the provided Pascal code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Write a version of this Pascal function in Go with identical behavior.
program Derangements_RC; function FirstDerangement( var val : array of integer) : boolean; var n, j : integer; begin n := Length( val); result := (n <> 1); if n < 2 then exit; if Odd(n) then begin val[n - 3] := n - 2; val[n - 2] := n - 1; val[n - 1] := n - 3; dec( n, 3); end; j := 0; ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Perl to C.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Perl version.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Perl to C#.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Convert this Perl snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Convert this Perl block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Convert this Perl block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Perl code.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Perl code.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Perl version.
sub d { $ grep { $_[$_] != @{$_[0]} } 1 .. $ : $_[0] } sub deranged { my ($result, @avail) = @_; return $result if !@avail; my @list; for my $i (0 .. $ next if $...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Write a version of this Racket function in C with identical behavior.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Translate the given Racket code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Generate an equivalent C# version of this Racket code.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Racket to Java without modifying what it does.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Transform the following Racket implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Port the following code from Racket to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Racket to Python.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Write a version of this Racket function in Go with identical behavior.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
#lang racket (define (all-misplaced? l) (for/and ([x (in-list l)] [n (in-naturals 1)]) (not (= x n)))) (define (derangements n) (define (all-misplaced? l1 l2) (or (null? l1) (and (not (eq? (car l1) (car l2))) (all-misplaced? (cdr l1) (cdr l2))))) (define l (range n)) (for/list ([p (p...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Convert the following code from REXX to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from REXX to C#.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from REXX to Java, same semantics.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Convert the following code from REXX to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Change the programming language of this snippet from REXX to Python without modifying what it does.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this REXX implementation.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Convert the following code from REXX to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Generate a Go translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
numeric digits 1000 parse arg N .; if N=='' | N=="," then N=4 d= derangeSet(N) say d 'derangements for' N "items are:" say do i=1 for d say right('derangement', 22) right(i, length(d) ) ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Transform the following Ruby implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ruby to C#.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Convert this Ruby snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ruby to Java without modifying what it does.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Generate an equivalent Java version of this Ruby code.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Translate the given Ruby code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Transform the following Ruby implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ruby to Go, same semantics.
def derangements(n) ary = (1 .. n).to_a ary.permutation.select do |perm| ary.zip(perm).all? {|a,b| a != b} end end def subfact(n) case n when 0 then 1 when 1 then 0 else (n-1)*(subfact(n-1) + subfact(n-2)) end end puts "derangements for n = 4" derangements(4).each{|d|p d} puts "\n n derange su...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Convert this Scala snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Scala code in C.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to C#, same semantics.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Transform the following Scala implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Scala.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in Scala.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Scala implementation.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to Python.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Scala code.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Change the following Scala code into Go without altering its purpose.
fun <T> permute(input: List<T>): List<List<T>> { if (input.size == 1) return listOf(input) val perms = mutableListOf<List<T>>() val toInsert = input[0] for (perm in permute(input.drop(1))) { for (i in 0..perm.size) { val newPerm = perm.toMutableList() newPerm.add(i, toI...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this Tcl implementation.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Generate an equivalent C version of this Tcl code.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long long LONG; LONG deranged(int depth, int len, int *d, int show) { int i; char tmp; LONG count = 0; if (depth == len) { if (show) { for (i = 0; i < len; i++) putchar(d[i] + 'a'); putc...
Port the following code from Tcl to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Tcl.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
using System; class Derangements { static int n = 4; static int [] buf = new int [n]; static bool [] used = new bool [n]; static void Main() { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) used [i] = false; rec(0); } static void rec(int ind) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (!used [i] && i != in...
Write a version of this Tcl function in Java with identical behavior.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in Tcl.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; public class Derangement { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("derangements for n = 4\n"); for (Object d : (ArrayList)(derangements(4, false)[0])) { System.out.println(Arrays.toString(...
Convert the following code from Tcl to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Convert the following code from Tcl to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
from itertools import permutations import math def derangements(n): 'All deranged permutations of the integers 0..n-1 inclusive' return ( perm for perm in permutations(range(n)) if all(indx != p for indx, p in enumerate(perm)) ) def subfact(n): if n == 2 or n == 0: return 1 elif ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Tcl, keeping it the same logically?
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Port the provided Tcl code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
package require Tcl 8.5; package require struct::list; proc derangements lst { if {![llength $lst]} {return {{}}} set result {} for {set perm [struct::list firstperm $lst]} {[llength $perm]} \ {set perm [struct::list nextperm $perm]} { set skip 0 foreach a $lst b $perm { if {[set skip ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) func dList(n int) (r [][]int) { a := make([]int, n) for i := range a { a[i] = i } var recurse func(last int) recurse = func(last int) { if last == 0 { for j, v := range a { ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to C# without modifying what it does.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slic...
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Generate an equivalent C version of this Ada code.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slic...
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Ada.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slic...
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << new...
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in Ada.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slic...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Change the following Ada code into Java without altering its purpose.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slic...
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Ada.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slic...
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
with Ada.Strings.Fixed, Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Strings, Ada.Text_IO; procedure String_Replace is Original : constant String := "Mary had a @__@ lamb."; Tbr : constant String := "@__@"; New_Str : constant String := "little"; Index : Natural := Fixed.Index (Original, Tbr); begin Put_Line (Fixed.Replace_Slic...
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Port the provided Arturo code into C while preserving the original functionality.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Port the provided Arturo code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Transform the following Arturo implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << new...
Port the following code from Arturo to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Change the following Arturo code into Python without altering its purpose.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Arturo.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Translate the given Arturo code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
sizeOfLamb: "little" print ~"Mary had a |sizeOfLamb| lamb."
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in AutoHotKey.
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << new...
Change the programming language of this snippet from AutoHotKey to Java without modifying what it does.
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Change the following AutoHotKey code into Python without altering its purpose.
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of AutoHotKey, keeping it the same logically?
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Translate the given AutoHotKey code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
LIT = little string = Mary had a %LIT% lamb. LIT := "little" string := "Mary had a" LIT " lamb." MsgBox %string%
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from AWK to C.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this AWK code in C++.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
#include <string> #include <iostream> int main( ) { std::string original( "Mary had a X lamb." ) , toBeReplaced( "X" ) , replacement ( "little" ) ; std::string newString = original.replace( original.find( "X" ) , toBeReplaced.length( ) , replacement ) ; std::cout << "String after replacement: " << new...
Change the following AWK code into Java without altering its purpose.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
String original = "Mary had a X lamb"; String little = "little"; String replaced = original.replace("X", little); System.out.println(replaced); System.out.printf("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); String formatted = String.format("Mary had a %s lamb.", little); System.out.println(formatted);
Write a version of this AWK function in Python with identical behavior.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
>>> original = 'Mary had a %s lamb.' >>> extra = 'little' >>> original % extra 'Mary had a little lamb.'
Translate the given AWK code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
Dim name as String = "J. Doe" Dim balance as Double = 123.45 Dim prompt as String = String.Format("Hello {0}, your balance is {1}.", name, balance) Console.WriteLine(prompt)
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original AWK code.
BEGIN { str="Mary had a gsub(/ print str }
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Mary had a %s lamb" txt := "little" out := fmt.Sprintf(str, txt) fmt.Println(out) }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Common_Lisp to C, same semantics.
(let [little "little"] (println (format "Mary had a %s lamb." little)))
#include <stdio.h> int main() { const char *extra = "little"; printf("Mary had a %s lamb.\n", extra); return 0; }
Port the following code from Common_Lisp to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
(let [little "little"] (println (format "Mary had a %s lamb." little)))
class Program { static void Main() { string extra = "little"; string formatted = $"Mary had a {extra} lamb."; System.Console.WriteLine(formatted); } }