Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Haskell snippet.
import Control.Monad (zipWithM) egcd :: Int -> Int -> (Int, Int) egcd _ 0 = (1, 0) egcd a b = (t, s - q * t) where (s, t) = egcd b r (q, r) = a `quotRem` b modInv :: Int -> Int -> Either String Int modInv a b = case egcd a b of (x, y) | a * x + b * y == 1 -> Right x | otherwise -> Left $ "No modular inverse for " ++ show a ++ " and " ++ show b chineseRemainder :: [Int] -> [Int] -> Either String Int chineseRemainder residues modulii = zipWithM modInv crtModulii modulii >>= (Right . (`mod` modPI) . sum . zipWith (*) crtModulii . zipWith (*) residues) where modPI = product modulii crtModulii = (modPI `div`) <$> modulii main :: IO () main = mapM_ (putStrLn . either id show) $ uncurry chineseRemainder <$> [ ([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]) , ([10, 4, 9], [11, 22, 19]) , ([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]) ]
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Generate an equivalent C version of this J code.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Generate an equivalent C# version of this J code.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original J snippet.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of J, keeping it the same logically?
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this J code.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from J to Java without modifying what it does.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in J.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Write a version of this J function in Python with identical behavior.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this J implementation.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of J, keeping it the same logically?
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of J, keeping it the same logically?
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
crt =: (1 + ] - {:@:[ -: {.@:[ | ])^:_&0@:,:
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this Julia implementation.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Julia snippet.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Julia implementation.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Port the following code from Julia to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Julia.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Julia.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Generate a Java translation of this Julia snippet without changing its computational steps.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Change the following Julia code into Java without altering its purpose.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Julia to Python, same semantics.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Convert this Julia snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Julia, keeping it the same logically?
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Julia to VB, same semantics.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Port the provided Julia code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Julia code.
function chineseremainder(n::Array, a::Array) Π = prod(n) mod(sum(ai * invmod(Π ÷ ni, ni) * (Π ÷ ni) for (ni, ai) in zip(n, a)), Π) end @show chineseremainder([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2])
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Lua code.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Generate a C translation of this Lua snippet without changing its computational steps.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Lua.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original Lua code.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Lua.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Generate a C++ translation of this Lua snippet without changing its computational steps.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Convert this Lua block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Lua to Python.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Lua to VB.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Translate the given Lua code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Lua code.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Convert this Lua block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
function prodf(a, ...) return a and a * prodf(...) or 1 end function prodt(t) return prodf(unpack(t)) end function mulInv(a, b) local b0 = b local x0 = 0 local x1 = 1 if b == 1 then return 1 end while a > 1 do local q = math.floor(a / b) local amb = math.fmod(a, b) a = b b = amb local xqx = x1 - q * x0 x1 = x0 x0 = xqx end if x1 < 0 then x1 = x1 + b0 end return x1 end function chineseRemainder(n, a) local prod = prodt(n) local p local sm = 0 for i=1,#n do p = prod / n[i] sm = sm + a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p end return math.fmod(sm, prod) end n = {3, 5, 7} a = {2, 3, 2} io.write(chineseRemainder(n, a))
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in Mathematica.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Convert this Mathematica block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Mathematica to C#.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of Mathematica, keeping it the same logically?
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Mathematica.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Generate an equivalent Java version of this Mathematica code.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Port the provided Mathematica code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Mathematica code.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Generate an equivalent VB version of this Mathematica code.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Mathematica version.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this Mathematica implementation.
ChineseRemainder[{2, 3, 2}, {3, 5, 7}] 23
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Port the provided MATLAB code into C while preserving the original functionality.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original MATLAB code.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Generate a C# translation of this MATLAB snippet without changing its computational steps.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Port the provided MATLAB code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from MATLAB to C++ without modifying what it does.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Port the provided MATLAB code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Translate the given MATLAB code snippet into Java without altering its behavior.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from MATLAB to Java, same semantics.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the MATLAB version.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from MATLAB to Python.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Convert the following code from MATLAB to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in MATLAB.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Translate the given MATLAB code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Write the same code in Go as shown below in MATLAB.
function f = chineseRemainder(r, m) s = prod(m) ./ m; [~, t] = gcd(s, m); f = s .* t * r';
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Convert this Nim snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Nim.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Port the following code from Nim to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Nim to C#, same semantics.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Convert the following code from Nim to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Convert this Nim block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Nim to Java without modifying what it does.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Nim version.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Nim.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original Nim code.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Convert this Nim block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
proc mulInv(a0, b0: int): int = var (a, b, x0) = (a0, b0, 0) result = 1 if b == 1: return while a > 1: let q = a div b a = a mod b swap a, b result = result - q * x0 swap x0, result if result < 0: result += b0 proc chineseRemainder[T](n, a: T): int = var prod = 1 var sum = 0 for x in n: prod *= x for i in 0..<n.len: let p = prod div n[i] sum += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p sum mod prod echo chineseRemainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2])
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Convert this OCaml block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from OCaml to C without modifying what it does.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this OCaml implementation.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of OCaml, keeping it the same logically?
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this OCaml implementation.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original OCaml snippet.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Port the following code from OCaml to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Generate a Java translation of this OCaml snippet without changing its computational steps.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Translate the given OCaml code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Write a version of this OCaml function in Python with identical behavior.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Convert this OCaml snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Port the provided OCaml code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Port the following code from OCaml to Go with equivalent syntax and logic.
exception Modular_inverse let inverse_mod a = function | 1 -> 1 | b -> let rec inner a b x0 x1 = if a <= 1 then x1 else if b = 0 then raise Modular_inverse else inner b (a mod b) (x1 - (a / b) * x0) x0 in let x = inner a b 0 1 in if x < 0 then x + b else x let chinese_remainder_exn congruences = let mtot = congruences |> List.map (fun (_, x) -> x) |> List.fold_left ( *) 1 in (List.fold_left (fun acc (r, n) -> acc + r * inverse_mod (mtot / n) n * (mtot / n) ) 0 congruences) mod mtot let chinese_remainder congruences = try Some (chinese_remainder_exn congruences) with modular_inverse -> None
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Convert this Pascal snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Pascal snippet.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }