Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Pascal snippet.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original Pascal code.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Pascal.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Change the following Pascal code into Python without altering its purpose.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Pascal, keeping it the same logically?
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Translate the given Pascal code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Please provide an equivalent version of this Pascal code in Go.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Write a version of this Pascal function in Go with identical behavior.
program ChineseRemThm; uses SysUtils; type TIntArray = array of integer; procedure Solve2( const res1, res2, mod1, mod2 : integer; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var a, c, d, k, m, m1, m2, r, temp : integer; p, p_prev : integer; q, q_prev : integer; begin if (mod1 = 0) or (mod2 = 0) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Solve2: Modulus cannot be 0'); m1 := Abs( mod1); m2 := Abs( mod2); c := m1; d := m2; p :=0; p_prev := 1; q := 1; q_prev := 0; a := 0; while (d > 0) do begin temp := p_prev - a*p; p_prev := p; p := temp; temp := q_prev - a*q; q_prev := q; q := temp; a := c div d; temp := c - a*d; c := d; d := temp; end; Assert( c = p*m2 + q*m1); k := (res2 - res1) div c; if res2 - res1 <> k*c then begin res_out := 0; mod_out := 0; end else begin m := (m1 div c) * m2; r:= res2 - k*p*m2; Assert( r = res1 + k*q*m1); if (r >= 0) then r := r mod m else begin r := (-r) mod m; if (r > 0) then r := m - r; end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; end; procedure SolveMulti( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray; out res_out, mod_out : integer); var count, k, m, r : integer; begin count := Length( mod_array); if count <> Length( res_array) then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are different sizes') else if count = 0 then raise SysUtils.Exception.Create( 'Arrays are empty'); k := 1; m := mod_array[0]; r := res_array[0]; while (k < count) and (m > 0) do begin Solve2( r, res_array[k], m, mod_array[k], r, m); inc(k); end; res_out := r; mod_out := m; end; function ArrayToString( a : TIntArray) : string; var j : integer; begin result := '['; for j := 0 to High(a) do begin result := result + SysUtils.IntToStr(a[j]); if j < High(a) then result := result + ', ' else result := result + ']'; end; end; procedure ShowSolution( const res_array, mod_array : TIntArray); var mod_out, res_out : integer; begin SolveMulti( res_array, mod_array, res_out, mod_out); Write( ArrayToString( res_array) + ' mod ' + ArrayToString( mod_array) + ' --> '); if mod_out = 0 then WriteLn( 'No solution') else WriteLn( SysUtils.Format( '%d mod %d', [res_out, mod_out])); end; begin ShowSolution([2, 3, 2], [3, 5, 7]); ShowSolution([3, 5, 7], [2, 3, 2]); ShowSolution([10, 4, 12], [11, 12, 13]); ShowSolution([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 7, 9, 11]); ShowSolution([11, 22, 19], [10, 4, 9]); ShowSolution([2328, 410], [16256, 5418]); ShowSolution([19, 0], [100, 23]); end.
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Port the following code from Perl to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Perl to C without modifying what it does.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Perl to C#.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Convert this Perl block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Write a version of this Perl function in C++ with identical behavior.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Perl.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Perl version.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Perl to Java without modifying what it does.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Perl to Python.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Convert this Perl snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Convert this Perl snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Please provide an equivalent version of this Perl code in VB.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Translate the given Perl code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Write a version of this Perl function in Go with identical behavior.
use ntheory qw/chinese/; say chinese([2,3], [3,5], [2,7]);
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Change the following Racket code into C without altering its purpose.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Convert this Racket block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Translate the given Racket code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of Racket, keeping it the same logically?
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Racket.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original Racket code.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Port the following code from Racket to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Racket snippet.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Change the programming language of this snippet from Racket to Python without modifying what it does.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Convert this Racket snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Generate an equivalent VB version of this Racket code.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in Racket.
#lang racket (require (only-in math/number-theory solve-chinese)) (define as '(2 3 2)) (define ns '(3 5 7)) (solve-chinese as ns)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Write the same code in C as shown below in REXX.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this REXX code in C.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original REXX code.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Generate a C# translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original REXX code.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in REXX.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Port the provided REXX code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Write a version of this REXX function in Python with identical behavior.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Generate a VB translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original REXX code.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in REXX.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Write the same code in Go as shown below in REXX.
parse arg Ns As . if Ns=='' | Ns=="," then Ns= '3,5,7' if As=='' | As=="," then As= '2,3,2' say 'Ns: ' Ns say 'As: ' As; say Ns= space( translate(Ns, , ',')); #= words(Ns) As= space( translate(As, , ',')); _= words(As) if #\==_ then do; say "size of number sets don't match."; exit 131; end if #==0 then do; say "size of the N set isn't valid."; exit 132; end if _==0 then do; say "size of the A set isn't valid."; exit 133; end N= 1 do j=1 for # n.j= word(Ns, j); N= N * n.j a.j= word(As, j) end do x=1 for N do i=1 for # if x//n.i\==a.i then iterate x end say 'found a solution with X=' x exit 0 end say 'no solution found.'
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Ruby.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Port the provided Ruby code into C while preserving the original functionality.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Transform the following Ruby implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Port the following code from Ruby to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Generate a Java translation of this Ruby snippet without changing its computational steps.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Ruby code.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Ruby version.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ruby code in VB.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original Ruby code.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ruby to Go.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Ruby snippet.
def chinese_remainder(mods, remainders) max = mods.inject( :* ) series = remainders.zip( mods ).map{|r,m| r.step( max, m ).to_a } series.inject( :& ).first end p chinese_remainder([3,5,7], [2,3,2]) p chinese_remainder([10,4,9], [11,22,19])
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Scala.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to C, same semantics.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Convert this Scala block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Scala snippet.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Transform the following Scala implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to C++.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Scala, keeping it the same logically?
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to Java.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Convert this Scala snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to VB, same semantics.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Scala code.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Scala code.
fun multInv(a: Int, b: Int): Int { if (b == 1) return 1 var aa = a var bb = b var x0 = 0 var x1 = 1 while (aa > 1) { val q = aa / bb var t = bb bb = aa % bb aa = t t = x0 x0 = x1 - q * x0 x1 = t } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b return x1 } fun chineseRemainder(n: IntArray, a: IntArray): Int { val prod = n.fold(1) { acc, i -> acc * i } var sum = 0 for (i in 0 until n.size) { val p = prod / n[i] sum += a[i] * multInv(p, n[i]) * p } return sum % prod } fun main(args: Array<String>) { val n = intArrayOf(3, 5, 7) val a = intArrayOf(2, 3, 2) println(chineseRemainder(n, a)) }
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Swift snippet.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Convert this Swift block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Generate a C# translation of this Swift snippet without changing its computational steps.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Generate an equivalent C# version of this Swift code.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this Swift code.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Swift code in C++.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Swift.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Port the following code from Swift to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
import static java.util.Arrays.stream; public class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int chineseRemainder(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = stream(n).reduce(1, (i, j) -> i * j); int p, sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int mulInv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b; int x0 = 0; int x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { int q = a / b; int amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; int xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] n = {3, 5, 7}; int[] a = {2, 3, 2}; System.out.println(chineseRemainder(n, a)); } }
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Swift version.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Please provide an equivalent version of this Swift code in Python.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
def chinese_remainder(n, a): sum = 0 prod = reduce(lambda a, b: a*b, n) for n_i, a_i in zip(n, a): p = prod / n_i sum += a_i * mul_inv(p, n_i) * p return sum % prod def mul_inv(a, b): b0 = b x0, x1 = 0, 1 if b == 1: return 1 while a > 1: q = a / b a, b = b, a%b x0, x1 = x1 - q * x0, x0 if x1 < 0: x1 += b0 return x1 if __name__ == '__main__': n = [3, 5, 7] a = [2, 3, 2] print chinese_remainder(n, a)
Port the provided Swift code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Generate a VB translation of this Swift snippet without changing its computational steps.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
Private Function chinese_remainder(n As Variant, a As Variant) As Variant Dim p As Long, prod As Long, tot As Long prod = 1: tot = 0 For i = 1 To UBound(n) prod = prod * n(i) Next i Dim m As Variant For i = 1 To UBound(n) p = prod / n(i) m = mul_inv(p, n(i)) If WorksheetFunction.IsText(m) Then chinese_remainder = "fail" Exit Function End If tot = tot + a(i) * m * p Next i chinese_remainder = tot Mod prod End Function Public Sub re() Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{3,5,7}], [{2,3,2}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,12,13}], [{10,4,12}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{11,22,19}], [{10,4,9}]) Debug.Print chinese_remainder([{100,23}], [{19,0}]) End Sub
Translate the given Swift code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Port the provided Swift code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
import Darwin func euclid(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> (Int,Int) { if m % n == 0 { return (0,1) } else { let rs = euclid(n % m, m) let r = rs.1 - rs.0 * (n / m) let s = rs.0 return (r,s) } } func gcd(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Int { let rs = euclid(m, n) return m * rs.0 + n * rs.1 } func coprime(_ m:Int, _ n:Int) -> Bool { return gcd(m,n) == 1 ? true : false } coprime(14,26) func crt(_ a_i:[Int], _ n_i:[Int]) -> Int { let divs = n_i.enumerated() divs.forEach{ n in divs.filter{ $0.0 < n.0 }.forEach{ assert(coprime(n.1, $0.1)) } } let N = n_i.map{$0}.reduce(1, *) var s:[Int] = [] n_i.forEach{ s += [euclid($0, N / $0).1] } var x = 0 a_i.enumerated().forEach{ x += $0.1 * s[$0.0] * N / n_i[$0.0] } return x % N } let a = [2,3,2] let n = [3,5,7] let x = crt(a,n) print(x)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" ) var one = big.NewInt(1) func crt(a, n []*big.Int) (*big.Int, error) { p := new(big.Int).Set(n[0]) for _, n1 := range n[1:] { p.Mul(p, n1) } var x, q, s, z big.Int for i, n1 := range n { q.Div(p, n1) z.GCD(nil, &s, n1, &q) if z.Cmp(one) != 0 { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d not coprime", n1) } x.Add(&x, s.Mul(a[i], s.Mul(&s, &q))) } return x.Mod(&x, p), nil } func main() { n := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(5), big.NewInt(7), } a := []*big.Int{ big.NewInt(2), big.NewInt(3), big.NewInt(2), } fmt.Println(crt(a, n)) }
Convert this Tcl snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
proc ::tcl::mathfunc::mulinv {a b} { if {$b == 1} {return 1} set b0 $b; set x0 0; set x1 1 while {$a > 1} { set x0 [expr {$x1 - ($a / $b) * [set x1 $x0]}] set b [expr {$a % [set a $b]}] } incr x1 [expr {($x1 < 0) * $b0}] } proc chineseRemainder {nList aList} { set sum 0; set prod [::tcl::mathop::* {*}$nList] foreach n $nList a $aList { set p [expr {$prod / $n}] incr sum [expr {$a * mulinv($p, $n) * $p}] } expr {$sum % $prod} } puts [chineseRemainder {3 5 7} {2 3 2}]
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Tcl code.
proc ::tcl::mathfunc::mulinv {a b} { if {$b == 1} {return 1} set b0 $b; set x0 0; set x1 1 while {$a > 1} { set x0 [expr {$x1 - ($a / $b) * [set x1 $x0]}] set b [expr {$a % [set a $b]}] } incr x1 [expr {($x1 < 0) * $b0}] } proc chineseRemainder {nList aList} { set sum 0; set prod [::tcl::mathop::* {*}$nList] foreach n $nList a $aList { set p [expr {$prod / $n}] incr sum [expr {$a * mulinv($p, $n) * $p}] } expr {$sum % $prod} } puts [chineseRemainder {3 5 7} {2 3 2}]
#include <stdio.h> int mul_inv(int a, int b) { int b0 = b, t, q; int x0 = 0, x1 = 1; if (b == 1) return 1; while (a > 1) { q = a / b; t = b, b = a % b, a = t; t = x0, x0 = x1 - q * x0, x1 = t; } if (x1 < 0) x1 += b0; return x1; } int chinese_remainder(int *n, int *a, int len) { int p, i, prod = 1, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) prod *= n[i]; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sum += a[i] * mul_inv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sum % prod; } int main(void) { int n[] = { 3, 5, 7 }; int a[] = { 2, 3, 2 }; printf("%d\n", chinese_remainder(n, a, sizeof(n)/sizeof(n[0]))); return 0; }
Convert the following code from Tcl to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
proc ::tcl::mathfunc::mulinv {a b} { if {$b == 1} {return 1} set b0 $b; set x0 0; set x1 1 while {$a > 1} { set x0 [expr {$x1 - ($a / $b) * [set x1 $x0]}] set b [expr {$a % [set a $b]}] } incr x1 [expr {($x1 < 0) * $b0}] } proc chineseRemainder {nList aList} { set sum 0; set prod [::tcl::mathop::* {*}$nList] foreach n $nList a $aList { set p [expr {$prod / $n}] incr sum [expr {$a * mulinv($p, $n) * $p}] } expr {$sum % $prod} } puts [chineseRemainder {3 5 7} {2 3 2}]
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
proc ::tcl::mathfunc::mulinv {a b} { if {$b == 1} {return 1} set b0 $b; set x0 0; set x1 1 while {$a > 1} { set x0 [expr {$x1 - ($a / $b) * [set x1 $x0]}] set b [expr {$a % [set a $b]}] } incr x1 [expr {($x1 < 0) * $b0}] } proc chineseRemainder {nList aList} { set sum 0; set prod [::tcl::mathop::* {*}$nList] foreach n $nList a $aList { set p [expr {$prod / $n}] incr sum [expr {$a * mulinv($p, $n) * $p}] } expr {$sum % $prod} } puts [chineseRemainder {3 5 7} {2 3 2}]
using System; using System.Linq; namespace ChineseRemainderTheorem { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int[] n = { 3, 5, 7 }; int[] a = { 2, 3, 2 }; int result = ChineseRemainderTheorem.Solve(n, a); int counter = 0; int maxCount = n.Length - 1; while (counter <= maxCount) { Console.WriteLine($"{result} ≡ {a[counter]} (mod {n[counter]})"); counter++; } } } public static class ChineseRemainderTheorem { public static int Solve(int[] n, int[] a) { int prod = n.Aggregate(1, (i, j) => i * j); int p; int sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.Length; i++) { p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * ModularMultiplicativeInverse(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } private static int ModularMultiplicativeInverse(int a, int mod) { int b = a % mod; for (int x = 1; x < mod; x++) { if ((b * x) % mod == 1) { return x; } } return 1; } } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Tcl to C++, same semantics.
proc ::tcl::mathfunc::mulinv {a b} { if {$b == 1} {return 1} set b0 $b; set x0 0; set x1 1 while {$a > 1} { set x0 [expr {$x1 - ($a / $b) * [set x1 $x0]}] set b [expr {$a % [set a $b]}] } incr x1 [expr {($x1 < 0) * $b0}] } proc chineseRemainder {nList aList} { set sum 0; set prod [::tcl::mathop::* {*}$nList] foreach n $nList a $aList { set p [expr {$prod / $n}] incr sum [expr {$a * mulinv($p, $n) * $p}] } expr {$sum % $prod} } puts [chineseRemainder {3 5 7} {2 3 2}]
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }
Generate a C++ translation of this Tcl snippet without changing its computational steps.
proc ::tcl::mathfunc::mulinv {a b} { if {$b == 1} {return 1} set b0 $b; set x0 0; set x1 1 while {$a > 1} { set x0 [expr {$x1 - ($a / $b) * [set x1 $x0]}] set b [expr {$a % [set a $b]}] } incr x1 [expr {($x1 < 0) * $b0}] } proc chineseRemainder {nList aList} { set sum 0; set prod [::tcl::mathop::* {*}$nList] foreach n $nList a $aList { set p [expr {$prod / $n}] incr sum [expr {$a * mulinv($p, $n) * $p}] } expr {$sum % $prod} } puts [chineseRemainder {3 5 7} {2 3 2}]
#include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <vector> #include <execution> template<typename _Ty> _Ty mulInv(_Ty a, _Ty b) { _Ty b0 = b; _Ty x0 = 0; _Ty x1 = 1; if (b == 1) { return 1; } while (a > 1) { _Ty q = a / b; _Ty amb = a % b; a = b; b = amb; _Ty xqx = x1 - q * x0; x1 = x0; x0 = xqx; } if (x1 < 0) { x1 += b0; } return x1; } template<typename _Ty> _Ty chineseRemainder(std::vector<_Ty> n, std::vector<_Ty> a) { _Ty prod = std::reduce(std::execution::seq, n.begin(), n.end(), (_Ty)1, [](_Ty a, _Ty b) { return a * b; }); _Ty sm = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n.size(); i++) { _Ty p = prod / n[i]; sm += a[i] * mulInv(p, n[i]) * p; } return sm % prod; } int main() { vector<int> n = { 3, 5, 7 }; vector<int> a = { 2, 3, 2 }; cout << chineseRemainder(n,a) << endl; return 0; }