Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of MATLAB, keeping it the same logically?
>> get(0,'RecursionLimit') ans = 500 >> set(0,'RecursionLimit',2500) >> get(0,'RecursionLimit') ans = 2500
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in MATLAB.
>> get(0,'RecursionLimit') ans = 500 >> set(0,'RecursionLimit',2500) >> get(0,'RecursionLimit') ans = 2500
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Convert this Nim block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Port the provided Nim code into C while preserving the original functionality.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Convert the following code from Nim to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Nim snippet.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Port the provided Nim code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Nim version.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original Nim code.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Generate a Java translation of this Nim snippet without changing its computational steps.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Transform the following Nim implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in Nim.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Convert the following code from Nim to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Please provide an equivalent version of this Nim code in VB.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Nim code.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Port the provided Nim code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
proc recurse(i: int): int = echo i recurse(i+1) echo recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in OCaml.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Write the same code in C as shown below in OCaml.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original OCaml snippet.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Convert this OCaml snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original OCaml code.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Please provide an equivalent version of this OCaml code in Java.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Port the provided OCaml code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Convert the following code from OCaml to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this OCaml implementation.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Convert this OCaml snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Convert the following code from OCaml to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from OCaml to Go, same semantics.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original OCaml code.
# let last = ref 0 ;; val last : int ref = {contents = 0} # let rec f i = last := i; i + (f (i+1)) ;; val f : int -> int = <fun> # f 0 ;; stack overflow during evaluation (looping recursion?). # !last ;; - : int = 262067
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Perl, keeping it the same logically?
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Write a version of this Perl function in C with identical behavior.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Port the following code from Perl to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Perl snippet.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Perl to C++.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Perl to Java, same semantics.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Perl implementation.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Change the following Perl code into Python without altering its purpose.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Write a version of this Perl function in Python with identical behavior.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Perl.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Perl to VB, same semantics.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Please provide an equivalent version of this Perl code in Go.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Port the following code from Perl to Go with equivalent syntax and logic.
my $x = 0; recurse($x); sub recurse ($x) { print ++$x,"\n"; recurse($x); }
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Translate the given PowerShell code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the PowerShell version.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Translate the given PowerShell code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Convert the following code from PowerShell to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Port the following code from PowerShell to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the PowerShell version.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Convert this PowerShell snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from PowerShell to Python, same semantics.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Port the provided PowerShell code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Generate an equivalent VB version of this PowerShell code.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Translate the given PowerShell code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Generate an equivalent Go version of this PowerShell code.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Write the same code in Go as shown below in PowerShell.
function TestDepth ( $N ) { $N TestDepth ( $N + 1 ) } try { TestDepth 1 | ForEach { $Depth = $_ } } catch { "Exception message: " + $_.Exception.Message } "Last level before error: " + $Depth
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in R.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from R to C, same semantics.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Transform the following R implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Convert this R snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Change the following R code into C++ without altering its purpose.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Write a version of this R function in C++ with identical behavior.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Port the following code from R to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in R.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Write the same code in Python as shown below in R.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Translate the given R code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from R to VB.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Write a version of this R function in VB with identical behavior.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this R implementation.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original R snippet.
options("expressions") options(expressions = 10000) recurse <- function(x) { print(x) recurse(x+1) } recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Racket code in C.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Convert this Racket snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Rewrite this program in C# while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Racket version.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Racket to C#.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Racket to C++, same semantics.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Racket to C++ without modifying what it does.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Racket version.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Convert this Racket snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Port the provided Racket code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Racket.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Please provide an equivalent version of this Racket code in VB.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Racket, keeping it the same logically?
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Racket code.
#lang racket (define (recursion-limit) (with-handlers ((exn? (lambda (x) 0))) (add1 (recursion-limit))))
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of COBOL, keeping it the same logically?
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Write a version of this COBOL function in C with identical behavior.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Port the provided COBOL code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Generate an equivalent C# version of this COBOL code.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Generate a C++ translation of this COBOL snippet without changing its computational steps.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from COBOL to C++.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original COBOL snippet.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Generate a Java translation of this COBOL snippet without changing its computational steps.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in COBOL.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Translate the given COBOL code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Convert the following code from COBOL to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Convert this COBOL block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of COBOL, keeping it the same logically?
identification division. program-id. recurse. data division. working-storage section. 01 depth-counter pic 9(3). 01 install-address usage is procedure-pointer. 01 install-flag pic x comp-x value 0. 01 status-code pic x(2) comp-5. 01 ind pic s9(9) comp-5. linkage section. 01 err-msg pic x(325). procedure division. 100-main. set install-address to entry "300-err". call "CBL_ERROR_PROC" using install-flag install-address returning status-code. if status-code not = 0 display "ERROR INSTALLING ERROR PROC" stop run end-if move 0 to depth-counter. display 'Mung until no good.'. perform 200-mung. display 'No good.'. stop run. 200-mung. add 1 to depth-counter. display depth-counter. perform 200-mung. 300-err. entry "300-err" using err-msg. perform varying ind from 1 by 1 until (err-msg(ind:1) = x"00") or (ind = length of err-msg) continue end-perform display err-msg(1:ind). exit program.
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from REXX to C, same semantics.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }