Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from REXX to C.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Convert this REXX snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Port the following code from REXX to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Generate a C++ translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Convert this REXX block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Convert the following code from REXX to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Port the provided REXX code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from REXX to VB, same semantics.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Produce a functionally identical VB code for the snippet given in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Generate an equivalent Go version of this REXX code.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary import java.lang.management. memoryInfo() digDeeper(0) * Just keep digging * @param level depth gauge */ method digDeeper(level = int) private static binary do digDeeper(level + 1) catch ex = Error System.out.println('Recursion got' level 'levels deep on this system.') System.out.println('Recursion stopped by' ex.getClass.getName()) end return * Display some memory usage from the JVM * @see ManagementFactory * @see MemoryMXBean * @see MemoryUsage */ method memoryInfo() private static mxBean = ManagementFactory.getMemoryMXBean() -- get the MemoryMXBean hmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the heap MemoryUsage object nmMemoryUsage = mxBean.getNonHeapMemoryUsage() -- get the non-heap MemoryUsage object say 'JVM Memory Information:' say ' Heap:' hmMemoryUsage.toString() say ' Non-Heap:' nmMemoryUsage.toString() say '-'.left(120, '-') say return
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ruby to C.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Translate the given Ruby code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Change the following Ruby code into C# without altering its purpose.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Change the following Ruby code into C# without altering its purpose.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Ruby snippet.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original Ruby code.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Ruby implementation.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Write a version of this Ruby function in Java with identical behavior.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Port the provided Ruby code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Convert this Ruby snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Port the provided Ruby code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
def recurse x puts x recurse(x+1) end recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Translate the given Scala code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Port the provided Scala code into C while preserving the original functionality.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Change the following Scala code into C# without altering its purpose.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to C#.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Convert this Scala snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Change the following Scala code into C++ without altering its purpose.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Port the provided Scala code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to Java.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Transform the following Scala implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Write a version of this Scala function in Python with identical behavior.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original Scala code.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Please provide an equivalent version of this Scala code in Go.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to Go.
fun recurse(i: Int) { try { recurse(i + 1) } catch(e: StackOverflowError) { println("Limit of recursion is $i") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) = recurse(0)
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in Swift.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Generate a C translation of this Swift snippet without changing its computational steps.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Swift to C#.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Translate the given Swift code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Write a version of this Swift function in C++ with identical behavior.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Swift.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Convert this Swift snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Swift, keeping it the same logically?
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Swift, keeping it the same logically?
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Port the provided Swift code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Ensure the translated VB code behaves exactly like the original Swift snippet.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in Swift.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Change the following Swift code into Go without altering its purpose.
var n = 1 func recurse() { print(n) n += 1 recurse() } recurse()
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Tcl code.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Tcl.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
#include <stdio.h> void recurse(unsigned int i) { printf("%d\n", i); recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); return 0; }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Tcl snippet.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Convert the following code from Tcl to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
using System; class RecursionLimit { static void Main(string[] args) { Recur(0); } private static void Recur(int i) { Console.WriteLine(i); Recur(i + 1); } }
Convert this Tcl snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
#include <iostream> void recurse(unsigned int i) { std::cout<<i<<"\n"; recurse(i+1); } int main() { recurse(0); }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Tcl.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original Tcl code.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
public class RecursionTest { private static void recurse(int i) { try { recurse(i+1); } catch (StackOverflowError e) { System.out.print("Recursion depth on this system is " + i + "."); } } public static void main(String[] args) { recurse(0); } }
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Tcl version.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Tcl to Python, same semantics.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
import sys print(sys.getrecursionlimit())
Change the programming language of this snippet from Tcl to VB without modifying what it does.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Port the following code from Tcl to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
Option Explicit Sub Main() Debug.Print "The limit is : " & Limite_Recursivite(0) End Sub Function Limite_Recursivite(Cpt As Long) As Long Cpt = Cpt + 1 On Error Resume Next Limite_Recursivite Cpt On Error GoTo 0 Limite_Recursivite = Cpt End Function
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Tcl.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Tcl.
proc recur i { puts "This is depth [incr i]" catch {recur $i}; } recur 0
package main import ( "flag" "fmt" "runtime/debug" ) func main() { stack := flag.Int("stack", 0, "maximum per goroutine stack size or 0 for the default") flag.Parse() if *stack > 0 { debug.SetMaxStack(*stack) } r(1) } func r(l int) { if l%1000 == 0 { fmt.Println(l) } r(l + 1) }
Port the following code from Rust to PHP with equivalent syntax and logic.
fn recurse(n: i32) { println!("depth: {}", n); recurse(n + 1) } fn main() { recurse(0); }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Rewrite the snippet below in PHP so it works the same as the original Rust code.
fn recurse(n: i32) { println!("depth: {}", n); recurse(n + 1) } fn main() { recurse(0); }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Port the provided Ada code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Recursion_Depth is function Recursion (Depth : Positive) return Positive is begin return Recursion (Depth + 1); exception when Storage_Error => return Depth; end Recursion; begin Put_Line ("Recursion depth on this system is" & Integer'Image (Recursion (1))); end Test_Recursion_Depth;
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Translate the given Ada code snippet into PHP without altering its behavior.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Recursion_Depth is function Recursion (Depth : Positive) return Positive is begin return Recursion (Depth + 1); exception when Storage_Error => return Depth; end Recursion; begin Put_Line ("Recursion depth on this system is" & Integer'Image (Recursion (1))); end Test_Recursion_Depth;
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Port the following code from Arturo to PHP with equivalent syntax and logic.
recurse: function [x][ print x recurse x+1 ] recurse 0
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Can you help me rewrite this code in PHP instead of Arturo, keeping it the same logically?
recurse: function [x][ print x recurse x+1 ] recurse 0
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Write the same algorithm in PHP as shown in this AutoHotKey implementation.
Recurse(0) Recurse(x) { TrayTip, Number, %x% Recurse(x+1) }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Please provide an equivalent version of this AutoHotKey code in PHP.
Recurse(0) Recurse(x) { TrayTip, Number, %x% Recurse(x+1) }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Port the following code from AWK to PHP with equivalent syntax and logic.
BEGIN { x() print("done") } function x() { print(++n) if (n > 999999) { return } x() }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Convert this AWK block to PHP, preserving its control flow and logic.
BEGIN { x() print("done") } function x() { print(++n) if (n > 999999) { return } x() }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in PHP.
PROCrecurse(1) END DEF PROCrecurse(depth%) IF depth% MOD 100 = 0 PRINT TAB(0,0) depth%; PROCrecurse(depth% + 1) ENDPROC
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Change the following BBC_Basic code into PHP without altering its purpose.
PROCrecurse(1) END DEF PROCrecurse(depth%) IF depth% MOD 100 = 0 PRINT TAB(0,0) depth%; PROCrecurse(depth% + 1) ENDPROC
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in Clojure.
=> (def *stack* 0) => ((fn overflow [] ((def *stack* (inc *stack*))(overflow)))) java.lang.StackOverflowError (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) => *stack* 10498
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Convert the following code from Clojure to PHP, ensuring the logic remains intact.
=> (def *stack* 0) => ((fn overflow [] ((def *stack* (inc *stack*))(overflow)))) java.lang.StackOverflowError (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) => *stack* 10498
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Common_Lisp to PHP, same semantics.
(defun recursion-limit (x) (if (zp x) 0 (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" x) (1+ (recursion-limit (1+ x))))))
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Transform the following Common_Lisp implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
(defun recursion-limit (x) (if (zp x) 0 (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" x) (1+ (recursion-limit (1+ x))))))
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in D.
import std.c.stdio; void recurse(in uint i=0) { printf("%u ", i); recurse(i + 1); } void main() { recurse(); }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Write the same algorithm in PHP as shown in this D implementation.
import std.c.stdio; void recurse(in uint i=0) { printf("%u ", i); recurse(i + 1); } void main() { recurse(); }
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Change the following Delphi code into PHP without altering its purpose.
program Project2; uses SysUtils; function Recursive(Level : Integer) : Integer; begin try Level := Level + 1; Result := Recursive(Level); except on E: EStackOverflow do Result := Level; end; end; begin Writeln('Recursion Level is ', Recursive(0)); Writeln('Press any key to Exit'); Readln; end.
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Delphi to PHP, same semantics.
program Project2; uses SysUtils; function Recursive(Level : Integer) : Integer; begin try Level := Level + 1; Result := Recursive(Level); except on E: EStackOverflow do Result := Level; end; end; begin Writeln('Recursion Level is ', Recursive(0)); Writeln('Press any key to Exit'); Readln; end.
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Generate a PHP translation of this F# snippet without changing its computational steps.
let rec recurse n = recurse (n+1) recurse 0
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Transform the following F# implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
let rec recurse n = recurse (n+1) recurse 0
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Write the same algorithm in PHP as shown in this Factor implementation.
: recurse ( n -- n ) 1 + recurse ; 0 recurse
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Write a version of this Factor function in PHP with identical behavior.
: recurse ( n -- n ) 1 + recurse ; 0 recurse
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Convert this Forth block to PHP, preserving its control flow and logic.
: munge 1+ recurse ; : test 0 ['] munge catch if ." Recursion limit at depth " . then ; test
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in Forth.
: munge 1+ recurse ; : test 0 ['] munge catch if ." Recursion limit at depth " . then ; test
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Translate the given Fortran code snippet into PHP without altering its behavior.
program recursion_depth implicit none call recurse (1) contains recursive subroutine recurse (i) implicit none integer, intent (in) :: i write (*, '(i0)') i call recurse (i + 1) end subroutine recurse end program recursion_depth
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Write the same algorithm in PHP as shown in this Fortran implementation.
program recursion_depth implicit none call recurse (1) contains recursive subroutine recurse (i) implicit none integer, intent (in) :: i write (*, '(i0)') i call recurse (i + 1) end subroutine recurse end program recursion_depth
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Generate an equivalent PHP version of this Groovy code.
def recurse; recurse = { try { recurse (it + 1) } catch (StackOverflowError e) { return it } } recurse(0)
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in Groovy.
def recurse; recurse = { try { recurse (it + 1) } catch (StackOverflowError e) { return it } } recurse(0)
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in Haskell.
import Debug.Trace (trace) recurse :: Int -> Int recurse n = trace (show n) recurse (succ n) main :: IO () main = print $ recurse 1
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Rewrite this program in PHP while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Haskell version.
import Debug.Trace (trace) recurse :: Int -> Int recurse n = trace (show n) recurse (succ n) main :: IO () main = print $ recurse 1
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();
Generate an equivalent PHP version of this Icon code.
procedure main() envar := "MSTKSIZE" write(&errout,"Program to test recursion depth - dependant on the environment variable ",envar," = ",\getenv(envar)|&null) deepdive() end procedure deepdive() static d initial d := 0 write( d +:= 1) deepdive() end
<?php function a() { static $i = 0; print ++$i . "\n"; a(); } a();