Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in AWK.
BEGIN { split("a,b,c", a, ","); split("A,B,C", b, ","); split("1,2,3", c, ","); for(i = 1; i <= length(a); i++) { print a[i] b[i] c[i]; } }
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Write the same code in Java as shown below in AWK.
BEGIN { split("a,b,c", a, ","); split("A,B,C", b, ","); split("1,2,3", c, ","); for(i = 1; i <= length(a); i++) { print a[i] b[i] c[i]; } }
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original AWK snippet.
BEGIN { split("a,b,c", a, ","); split("A,B,C", b, ","); split("1,2,3", c, ","); for(i = 1; i <= length(a); i++) { print a[i] b[i] c[i]; } }
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Convert the following code from AWK to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
BEGIN { split("a,b,c", a, ","); split("A,B,C", b, ","); split("1,2,3", c, ","); for(i = 1; i <= length(a); i++) { print a[i] b[i] c[i]; } }
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Generate an equivalent Go version of this AWK code.
BEGIN { split("a,b,c", a, ","); split("A,B,C", b, ","); split("1,2,3", c, ","); for(i = 1; i <= length(a); i++) { print a[i] b[i] c[i]; } }
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original BBC_Basic snippet.
DIM array1$(2), array2$(2), array3%(2) array1$() = "a", "b", "c" array2$() = "A", "B", "C" array3%() = 1, 2, 3 FOR index% = 0 TO 2 PRINT array1$(index%) ; array2$(index%) ; array3%(index%) NEXT
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Write a version of this BBC_Basic function in C# with identical behavior.
DIM array1$(2), array2$(2), array3%(2) array1$() = "a", "b", "c" array2$() = "A", "B", "C" array3%() = 1, 2, 3 FOR index% = 0 TO 2 PRINT array1$(index%) ; array2$(index%) ; array3%(index%) NEXT
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Translate the given BBC_Basic code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
DIM array1$(2), array2$(2), array3%(2) array1$() = "a", "b", "c" array2$() = "A", "B", "C" array3%() = 1, 2, 3 FOR index% = 0 TO 2 PRINT array1$(index%) ; array2$(index%) ; array3%(index%) NEXT
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of BBC_Basic, keeping it the same logically?
DIM array1$(2), array2$(2), array3%(2) array1$() = "a", "b", "c" array2$() = "A", "B", "C" array3%() = 1, 2, 3 FOR index% = 0 TO 2 PRINT array1$(index%) ; array2$(index%) ; array3%(index%) NEXT
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Please provide an equivalent version of this BBC_Basic code in Python.
DIM array1$(2), array2$(2), array3%(2) array1$() = "a", "b", "c" array2$() = "A", "B", "C" array3%() = 1, 2, 3 FOR index% = 0 TO 2 PRINT array1$(index%) ; array2$(index%) ; array3%(index%) NEXT
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Translate the given BBC_Basic code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
DIM array1$(2), array2$(2), array3%(2) array1$() = "a", "b", "c" array2$() = "A", "B", "C" array3%() = 1, 2, 3 FOR index% = 0 TO 2 PRINT array1$(index%) ; array2$(index%) ; array3%(index%) NEXT
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original BBC_Basic code.
DIM array1$(2), array2$(2), array3%(2) array1$() = "a", "b", "c" array2$() = "A", "B", "C" array3%() = 1, 2, 3 FOR index% = 0 TO 2 PRINT array1$(index%) ; array2$(index%) ; array3%(index%) NEXT
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Generate a C translation of this Clojure snippet without changing its computational steps.
(doseq [s (map #(str %1 %2 %3) "abc" "ABC" "123")] (println s))
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Clojure snippet.
(doseq [s (map #(str %1 %2 %3) "abc" "ABC" "123")] (println s))
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Clojure.
(doseq [s (map #(str %1 %2 %3) "abc" "ABC" "123")] (println s))
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Translate the given Clojure code snippet into Java without altering its behavior.
(doseq [s (map #(str %1 %2 %3) "abc" "ABC" "123")] (println s))
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Convert this Clojure block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
(doseq [s (map #(str %1 %2 %3) "abc" "ABC" "123")] (println s))
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Transform the following Clojure implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
(doseq [s (map #(str %1 %2 %3) "abc" "ABC" "123")] (println s))
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Clojure code in Go.
(doseq [s (map #(str %1 %2 %3) "abc" "ABC" "123")] (println s))
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
(defun print-lists (xs ys zs) (if (or (endp xs) (endp ys) (endp zs)) nil (progn$ (cw (first xs)) (cw "~x0~x1~%" (first ys) (first zs)) (print-lists (rest xs) (rest ys) (rest zs)))...
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Common_Lisp implementation.
(defun print-lists (xs ys zs) (if (or (endp xs) (endp ys) (endp zs)) nil (progn$ (cw (first xs)) (cw "~x0~x1~%" (first ys) (first zs)) (print-lists (rest xs) (rest ys) (rest zs)))...
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Write a version of this Common_Lisp function in C++ with identical behavior.
(defun print-lists (xs ys zs) (if (or (endp xs) (endp ys) (endp zs)) nil (progn$ (cw (first xs)) (cw "~x0~x1~%" (first ys) (first zs)) (print-lists (rest xs) (rest ys) (rest zs)))...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Convert this Common_Lisp block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
(defun print-lists (xs ys zs) (if (or (endp xs) (endp ys) (endp zs)) nil (progn$ (cw (first xs)) (cw "~x0~x1~%" (first ys) (first zs)) (print-lists (rest xs) (rest ys) (rest zs)))...
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Write a version of this Common_Lisp function in Python with identical behavior.
(defun print-lists (xs ys zs) (if (or (endp xs) (endp ys) (endp zs)) nil (progn$ (cw (first xs)) (cw "~x0~x1~%" (first ys) (first zs)) (print-lists (rest xs) (rest ys) (rest zs)))...
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original Common_Lisp code.
(defun print-lists (xs ys zs) (if (or (endp xs) (endp ys) (endp zs)) nil (progn$ (cw (first xs)) (cw "~x0~x1~%" (first ys) (first zs)) (print-lists (rest xs) (rest ys) (rest zs)))...
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Write a version of this Common_Lisp function in Go with identical behavior.
(defun print-lists (xs ys zs) (if (or (endp xs) (endp ys) (endp zs)) nil (progn$ (cw (first xs)) (cw "~x0~x1~%" (first ys) (first zs)) (print-lists (rest xs) (rest ys) (rest zs)))...
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Port the following code from D to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
import std.stdio, std.range; void main () { foreach (a, b, c; zip("abc", "ABC", [1, 2, 3])) writeln(a, b, c); }
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Translate the given D code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
import std.stdio, std.range; void main () { foreach (a, b, c; zip("abc", "ABC", [1, 2, 3])) writeln(a, b, c); }
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of D, keeping it the same logically?
import std.stdio, std.range; void main () { foreach (a, b, c; zip("abc", "ABC", [1, 2, 3])) writeln(a, b, c); }
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original D code.
import std.stdio, std.range; void main () { foreach (a, b, c; zip("abc", "ABC", [1, 2, 3])) writeln(a, b, c); }
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Change the programming language of this snippet from D to Python without modifying what it does.
import std.stdio, std.range; void main () { foreach (a, b, c; zip("abc", "ABC", [1, 2, 3])) writeln(a, b, c); }
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in D.
import std.stdio, std.range; void main () { foreach (a, b, c; zip("abc", "ABC", [1, 2, 3])) writeln(a, b, c); }
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Translate the given D code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
import std.stdio, std.range; void main () { foreach (a, b, c; zip("abc", "ABC", [1, 2, 3])) writeln(a, b, c); }
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Generate an equivalent C version of this Delphi code.
program LoopOverArrays; uses SysUtils; const ARRAY1: array [1..3] of string = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ARRAY2: array [1..3] of string = ('A', 'B', 'C'); ARRAY3: array [1..3] of Integer = (1, 2, 3); var i: Integer; begin for i := 1 to 3 do Writeln(Format('%s%s%d', [ARRAY1[i], ARRAY2[i], ARRAY3[i]])); Readln...
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Transform the following Delphi implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
program LoopOverArrays; uses SysUtils; const ARRAY1: array [1..3] of string = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ARRAY2: array [1..3] of string = ('A', 'B', 'C'); ARRAY3: array [1..3] of Integer = (1, 2, 3); var i: Integer; begin for i := 1 to 3 do Writeln(Format('%s%s%d', [ARRAY1[i], ARRAY2[i], ARRAY3[i]])); Readln...
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Write a version of this Delphi function in C++ with identical behavior.
program LoopOverArrays; uses SysUtils; const ARRAY1: array [1..3] of string = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ARRAY2: array [1..3] of string = ('A', 'B', 'C'); ARRAY3: array [1..3] of Integer = (1, 2, 3); var i: Integer; begin for i := 1 to 3 do Writeln(Format('%s%s%d', [ARRAY1[i], ARRAY2[i], ARRAY3[i]])); Readln...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
program LoopOverArrays; uses SysUtils; const ARRAY1: array [1..3] of string = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ARRAY2: array [1..3] of string = ('A', 'B', 'C'); ARRAY3: array [1..3] of Integer = (1, 2, 3); var i: Integer; begin for i := 1 to 3 do Writeln(Format('%s%s%d', [ARRAY1[i], ARRAY2[i], ARRAY3[i]])); Readln...
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Delphi version.
program LoopOverArrays; uses SysUtils; const ARRAY1: array [1..3] of string = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ARRAY2: array [1..3] of string = ('A', 'B', 'C'); ARRAY3: array [1..3] of Integer = (1, 2, 3); var i: Integer; begin for i := 1 to 3 do Writeln(Format('%s%s%d', [ARRAY1[i], ARRAY2[i], ARRAY3[i]])); Readln...
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Convert this Delphi block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
program LoopOverArrays; uses SysUtils; const ARRAY1: array [1..3] of string = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ARRAY2: array [1..3] of string = ('A', 'B', 'C'); ARRAY3: array [1..3] of Integer = (1, 2, 3); var i: Integer; begin for i := 1 to 3 do Writeln(Format('%s%s%d', [ARRAY1[i], ARRAY2[i], ARRAY3[i]])); Readln...
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
program LoopOverArrays; uses SysUtils; const ARRAY1: array [1..3] of string = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ARRAY2: array [1..3] of string = ('A', 'B', 'C'); ARRAY3: array [1..3] of Integer = (1, 2, 3); var i: Integer; begin for i := 1 to 3 do Writeln(Format('%s%s%d', [ARRAY1[i], ARRAY2[i], ARRAY3[i]])); Readln...
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Elixir.
l1 = ["a", "b", "c"] l2 = ["A", "B", "C"] l3 = ["1", "2", "3"] IO.inspect List.zip([l1,l2,l3]) |> Enum.map(fn x-> Tuple.to_list(x) |> Enum.join end)
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
l1 = ["a", "b", "c"] l2 = ["A", "B", "C"] l3 = ["1", "2", "3"] IO.inspect List.zip([l1,l2,l3]) |> Enum.map(fn x-> Tuple.to_list(x) |> Enum.join end)
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Convert this Elixir block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
l1 = ["a", "b", "c"] l2 = ["A", "B", "C"] l3 = ["1", "2", "3"] IO.inspect List.zip([l1,l2,l3]) |> Enum.map(fn x-> Tuple.to_list(x) |> Enum.join end)
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Elixir, keeping it the same logically?
l1 = ["a", "b", "c"] l2 = ["A", "B", "C"] l3 = ["1", "2", "3"] IO.inspect List.zip([l1,l2,l3]) |> Enum.map(fn x-> Tuple.to_list(x) |> Enum.join end)
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Elixir version.
l1 = ["a", "b", "c"] l2 = ["A", "B", "C"] l3 = ["1", "2", "3"] IO.inspect List.zip([l1,l2,l3]) |> Enum.map(fn x-> Tuple.to_list(x) |> Enum.join end)
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Elixir.
l1 = ["a", "b", "c"] l2 = ["A", "B", "C"] l3 = ["1", "2", "3"] IO.inspect List.zip([l1,l2,l3]) |> Enum.map(fn x-> Tuple.to_list(x) |> Enum.join end)
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Elixir code.
l1 = ["a", "b", "c"] l2 = ["A", "B", "C"] l3 = ["1", "2", "3"] IO.inspect List.zip([l1,l2,l3]) |> Enum.map(fn x-> Tuple.to_list(x) |> Enum.join end)
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Erlang, keeping it the same logically?
lists:zipwith3(fun(A,B,C)-> io:format("~s~n",[[A,B,C]]) end, "abc", "ABC", "123").
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Port the following code from Erlang to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
lists:zipwith3(fun(A,B,C)-> io:format("~s~n",[[A,B,C]]) end, "abc", "ABC", "123").
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Port the provided Erlang code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
lists:zipwith3(fun(A,B,C)-> io:format("~s~n",[[A,B,C]]) end, "abc", "ABC", "123").
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Please provide an equivalent version of this Erlang code in Java.
lists:zipwith3(fun(A,B,C)-> io:format("~s~n",[[A,B,C]]) end, "abc", "ABC", "123").
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Erlang implementation.
lists:zipwith3(fun(A,B,C)-> io:format("~s~n",[[A,B,C]]) end, "abc", "ABC", "123").
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Erlang version.
lists:zipwith3(fun(A,B,C)-> io:format("~s~n",[[A,B,C]]) end, "abc", "ABC", "123").
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Erlang to Go.
lists:zipwith3(fun(A,B,C)-> io:format("~s~n",[[A,B,C]]) end, "abc", "ABC", "123").
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Change the following F# code into C without altering its purpose.
for c1,c2,n in Seq.zip3 ['a';'b';'c'] ['A';'B';'C'] [1;2;3] do printfn "%c%c%d" c1 c2 n
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Translate the given F# code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
for c1,c2,n in Seq.zip3 ['a';'b';'c'] ['A';'B';'C'] [1;2;3] do printfn "%c%c%d" c1 c2 n
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in F#.
for c1,c2,n in Seq.zip3 ['a';'b';'c'] ['A';'B';'C'] [1;2;3] do printfn "%c%c%d" c1 c2 n
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the F# version.
for c1,c2,n in Seq.zip3 ['a';'b';'c'] ['A';'B';'C'] [1;2;3] do printfn "%c%c%d" c1 c2 n
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from F# to Python, same semantics.
for c1,c2,n in Seq.zip3 ['a';'b';'c'] ['A';'B';'C'] [1;2;3] do printfn "%c%c%d" c1 c2 n
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Convert this F# block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
for c1,c2,n in Seq.zip3 ['a';'b';'c'] ['A';'B';'C'] [1;2;3] do printfn "%c%c%d" c1 c2 n
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
for c1,c2,n in Seq.zip3 ['a';'b';'c'] ['A';'B';'C'] [1;2;3] do printfn "%c%c%d" c1 c2 n
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Generate a C translation of this Factor snippet without changing its computational steps.
"abc" "ABC" "123" [ [ write1 ] tri@ nl ] 3each
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Factor snippet.
"abc" "ABC" "123" [ [ write1 ] tri@ nl ] 3each
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Transform the following Factor implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
"abc" "ABC" "123" [ [ write1 ] tri@ nl ] 3each
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
"abc" "ABC" "123" [ [ write1 ] tri@ nl ] 3each
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
"abc" "ABC" "123" [ [ write1 ] tri@ nl ] 3each
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Convert the following code from Factor to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
"abc" "ABC" "123" [ [ write1 ] tri@ nl ] 3each
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Factor snippet.
"abc" "ABC" "123" [ [ write1 ] tri@ nl ] 3each
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Change the following Forth code into C without altering its purpose.
create a char a , char b , char c , create b char A , char B , char C , create c char 1 , char 2 , char 3 , : main 3 0 do cr a i cells + @ emit b i cells + @ emit c i cells + @ emit loop cr a b c 3 0 do cr 3 0 do rot dup @ emit cell+ loop loop drop drop drop ;
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Port the provided Forth code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
create a char a , char b , char c , create b char A , char B , char C , create c char 1 , char 2 , char 3 , : main 3 0 do cr a i cells + @ emit b i cells + @ emit c i cells + @ emit loop cr a b c 3 0 do cr 3 0 do rot dup @ emit cell+ loop loop drop drop drop ;
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this Forth code.
create a char a , char b , char c , create b char A , char B , char C , create c char 1 , char 2 , char 3 , : main 3 0 do cr a i cells + @ emit b i cells + @ emit c i cells + @ emit loop cr a b c 3 0 do cr 3 0 do rot dup @ emit cell+ loop loop drop drop drop ;
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Convert the following code from Forth to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
create a char a , char b , char c , create b char A , char B , char C , create c char 1 , char 2 , char 3 , : main 3 0 do cr a i cells + @ emit b i cells + @ emit c i cells + @ emit loop cr a b c 3 0 do cr 3 0 do rot dup @ emit cell+ loop loop drop drop drop ;
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Forth to Python.
create a char a , char b , char c , create b char A , char B , char C , create c char 1 , char 2 , char 3 , : main 3 0 do cr a i cells + @ emit b i cells + @ emit c i cells + @ emit loop cr a b c 3 0 do cr 3 0 do rot dup @ emit cell+ loop loop drop drop drop ;
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Port the following code from Forth to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
create a char a , char b , char c , create b char A , char B , char C , create c char 1 , char 2 , char 3 , : main 3 0 do cr a i cells + @ emit b i cells + @ emit c i cells + @ emit loop cr a b c 3 0 do cr 3 0 do rot dup @ emit cell+ loop loop drop drop drop ;
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this Forth implementation.
create a char a , char b , char c , create b char A , char B , char C , create c char 1 , char 2 , char 3 , : main 3 0 do cr a i cells + @ emit b i cells + @ emit c i cells + @ emit loop cr a b c 3 0 do cr 3 0 do rot dup @ emit cell+ loop loop drop drop drop ;
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Fortran to C#.
program main implicit none integer,parameter :: n_vals = 3 character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ls = ['a','b','c'] character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: us = ['A','B','C'] integer,dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ns = [1,2,3] integer :: i do i=1,n_vals write(*,'(A1,A1,I1)')...
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Translate the given Fortran code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
program main implicit none integer,parameter :: n_vals = 3 character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ls = ['a','b','c'] character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: us = ['A','B','C'] integer,dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ns = [1,2,3] integer :: i do i=1,n_vals write(*,'(A1,A1,I1)')...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Write the same code in C as shown below in Fortran.
program main implicit none integer,parameter :: n_vals = 3 character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ls = ['a','b','c'] character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: us = ['A','B','C'] integer,dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ns = [1,2,3] integer :: i do i=1,n_vals write(*,'(A1,A1,I1)')...
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Fortran version.
program main implicit none integer,parameter :: n_vals = 3 character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ls = ['a','b','c'] character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: us = ['A','B','C'] integer,dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ns = [1,2,3] integer :: i do i=1,n_vals write(*,'(A1,A1,I1)')...
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Fortran code.
program main implicit none integer,parameter :: n_vals = 3 character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ls = ['a','b','c'] character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: us = ['A','B','C'] integer,dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ns = [1,2,3] integer :: i do i=1,n_vals write(*,'(A1,A1,I1)')...
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
program main implicit none integer,parameter :: n_vals = 3 character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ls = ['a','b','c'] character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: us = ['A','B','C'] integer,dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ns = [1,2,3] integer :: i do i=1,n_vals write(*,'(A1,A1,I1)')...
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Translate the given Fortran code snippet into PHP without altering its behavior.
program main implicit none integer,parameter :: n_vals = 3 character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ls = ['a','b','c'] character(len=*),dimension(n_vals),parameter :: us = ['A','B','C'] integer,dimension(n_vals),parameter :: ns = [1,2,3] integer :: i do i=1,n_vals write(*,'(A1,A1,I1)')...
$a = array('a', 'b', 'c'); $b = array('A', 'B', 'C'); $c = array('1', '2', '3'); //These don't *have* to be strings, but it saves PHP from casting them later if ((sizeOf($a) !== sizeOf($b)) || (sizeOf($b) !== sizeOf($c))){ throw new Exception('All three arrays must be the same length'); } foreach ($a as $key => $va...
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Groovy code.
def synchedConcat = { a1, a2, a3 -> assert a1 && a2 && a3 assert a1.size() == a2.size() assert a2.size() == a3.size() [a1, a2, a3].transpose().collect { "${it[0]}${it[1]}${it[2]}" } }
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Rewrite this program in C# while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Groovy version.
def synchedConcat = { a1, a2, a3 -> assert a1 && a2 && a3 assert a1.size() == a2.size() assert a2.size() == a3.size() [a1, a2, a3].transpose().collect { "${it[0]}${it[1]}${it[2]}" } }
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Groovy snippet.
def synchedConcat = { a1, a2, a3 -> assert a1 && a2 && a3 assert a1.size() == a2.size() assert a2.size() == a3.size() [a1, a2, a3].transpose().collect { "${it[0]}${it[1]}${it[2]}" } }
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Convert this Groovy block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
def synchedConcat = { a1, a2, a3 -> assert a1 && a2 && a3 assert a1.size() == a2.size() assert a2.size() == a3.size() [a1, a2, a3].transpose().collect { "${it[0]}${it[1]}${it[2]}" } }
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Groovy to Python, same semantics.
def synchedConcat = { a1, a2, a3 -> assert a1 && a2 && a3 assert a1.size() == a2.size() assert a2.size() == a3.size() [a1, a2, a3].transpose().collect { "${it[0]}${it[1]}${it[2]}" } }
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Change the programming language of this snippet from Groovy to VB without modifying what it does.
def synchedConcat = { a1, a2, a3 -> assert a1 && a2 && a3 assert a1.size() == a2.size() assert a2.size() == a3.size() [a1, a2, a3].transpose().collect { "${it[0]}${it[1]}${it[2]}" } }
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Groovy snippet.
def synchedConcat = { a1, a2, a3 -> assert a1 && a2 && a3 assert a1.size() == a2.size() assert a2.size() == a3.size() [a1, a2, a3].transpose().collect { "${it[0]}${it[1]}${it[2]}" } }
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Generate an equivalent C version of this Haskell code.
main = sequence [ putStrLn [x, y, z] | x <- "abc" | y <- "ABC" | z <- "123"]
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Haskell implementation.
main = sequence [ putStrLn [x, y, z] | x <- "abc" | y <- "ABC" | z <- "123"]
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Haskell.
main = sequence [ putStrLn [x, y, z] | x <- "abc" | y <- "ABC" | z <- "123"]
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Generate an equivalent Java version of this Haskell code.
main = sequence [ putStrLn [x, y, z] | x <- "abc" | y <- "ABC" | z <- "123"]
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Haskell to Python without modifying what it does.
main = sequence [ putStrLn [x, y, z] | x <- "abc" | y <- "ABC" | z <- "123"]
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Haskell to VB, same semantics.
main = sequence [ putStrLn [x, y, z] | x <- "abc" | y <- "ABC" | z <- "123"]
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Port the following code from Haskell to Go with equivalent syntax and logic.
main = sequence [ putStrLn [x, y, z] | x <- "abc" | y <- "ABC" | z <- "123"]
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Port the following code from Icon to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
procedure main() a := create !["a","b","c"] b := create !["A","B","C"] c := create !["1","2","3"] while write(@a,@b,@c) end
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Icon, keeping it the same logically?
procedure main() a := create !["a","b","c"] b := create !["A","B","C"] c := create !["1","2","3"] while write(@a,@b,@c) end
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of Icon, keeping it the same logically?
procedure main() a := create !["a","b","c"] b := create !["A","B","C"] c := create !["1","2","3"] while write(@a,@b,@c) end
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Change the following Icon code into Java without altering its purpose.
procedure main() a := create !["a","b","c"] b := create !["A","B","C"] c := create !["1","2","3"] while write(@a,@b,@c) end
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...