Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in Icon.
procedure main() a := create !["a","b","c"] b := create !["A","B","C"] c := create !["1","2","3"] while write(@a,@b,@c) end
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Please provide an equivalent version of this Icon code in VB.
procedure main() a := create !["a","b","c"] b := create !["A","B","C"] c := create !["1","2","3"] while write(@a,@b,@c) end
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Icon snippet.
procedure main() a := create !["a","b","c"] b := create !["A","B","C"] c := create !["1","2","3"] while write(@a,@b,@c) end
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Translate the given J code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
,.&:(":"0@>)/ 'abc' ; 'ABC' ; 1 2 3 aA1 bB2 cC3
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Convert this J block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic.
,.&:(":"0@>)/ 'abc' ; 'ABC' ; 1 2 3 aA1 bB2 cC3
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original J code.
,.&:(":"0@>)/ 'abc' ; 'ABC' ; 1 2 3 aA1 bB2 cC3
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Write a version of this J function in Java with identical behavior.
,.&:(":"0@>)/ 'abc' ; 'ABC' ; 1 2 3 aA1 bB2 cC3
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of J, keeping it the same logically?
,.&:(":"0@>)/ 'abc' ; 'ABC' ; 1 2 3 aA1 bB2 cC3
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of J, keeping it the same logically?
,.&:(":"0@>)/ 'abc' ; 'ABC' ; 1 2 3 aA1 bB2 cC3
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
,.&:(":"0@>)/ 'abc' ; 'ABC' ; 1 2 3 aA1 bB2 cC3
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Transform the following Julia implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
foreach(println, ('a', 'b', 'c'), ('A', 'B', 'C'), (1, 2, 3))
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Julia snippet.
foreach(println, ('a', 'b', 'c'), ('A', 'B', 'C'), (1, 2, 3))
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of Julia, keeping it the same logically?
foreach(println, ('a', 'b', 'c'), ('A', 'B', 'C'), (1, 2, 3))
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Transform the following Julia implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
foreach(println, ('a', 'b', 'c'), ('A', 'B', 'C'), (1, 2, 3))
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Julia snippet.
foreach(println, ('a', 'b', 'c'), ('A', 'B', 'C'), (1, 2, 3))
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Convert the following code from Julia to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
foreach(println, ('a', 'b', 'c'), ('A', 'B', 'C'), (1, 2, 3))
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
foreach(println, ('a', 'b', 'c'), ('A', 'B', 'C'), (1, 2, 3))
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Change the following Lua code into C# without altering its purpose.
a1, a2, a3 = {'a' , 'b' , 'c' } , { 'A' , 'B' , 'C' } , { 1 , 2 , 3 } for i = 1, 3 do print(a1[i]..a2[i]..a3[i]) end
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Write a version of this Lua function in C++ with identical behavior.
a1, a2, a3 = {'a' , 'b' , 'c' } , { 'A' , 'B' , 'C' } , { 1 , 2 , 3 } for i = 1, 3 do print(a1[i]..a2[i]..a3[i]) end
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Lua version.
a1, a2, a3 = {'a' , 'b' , 'c' } , { 'A' , 'B' , 'C' } , { 1 , 2 , 3 } for i = 1, 3 do print(a1[i]..a2[i]..a3[i]) end
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Port the following code from Lua to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
a1, a2, a3 = {'a' , 'b' , 'c' } , { 'A' , 'B' , 'C' } , { 1 , 2 , 3 } for i = 1, 3 do print(a1[i]..a2[i]..a3[i]) end
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Please provide an equivalent version of this Lua code in VB.
a1, a2, a3 = {'a' , 'b' , 'c' } , { 'A' , 'B' , 'C' } , { 1 , 2 , 3 } for i = 1, 3 do print(a1[i]..a2[i]..a3[i]) end
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
a1, a2, a3 = {'a' , 'b' , 'c' } , { 'A' , 'B' , 'C' } , { 1 , 2 , 3 } for i = 1, 3 do print(a1[i]..a2[i]..a3[i]) end
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Mathematica to C without modifying what it does.
MapThread[Print, {{"a", "b", "c"}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {1, 2, 3}}];
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Convert this Mathematica block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic.
MapThread[Print, {{"a", "b", "c"}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {1, 2, 3}}];
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Mathematica to C++.
MapThread[Print, {{"a", "b", "c"}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {1, 2, 3}}];
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Transform the following Mathematica implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
MapThread[Print, {{"a", "b", "c"}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {1, 2, 3}}];
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Translate the given Mathematica code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
MapThread[Print, {{"a", "b", "c"}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {1, 2, 3}}];
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Port the following code from Mathematica to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
MapThread[Print, {{"a", "b", "c"}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {1, 2, 3}}];
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to Go, same semantics.
MapThread[Print, {{"a", "b", "c"}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {1, 2, 3}}];
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
let a = @['a','b','c'] b = @["A","B","C"] c = @[1,2,3] for i in 0..2: echo a[i], b[i], c[i]
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Convert the following code from Nim to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
let a = @['a','b','c'] b = @["A","B","C"] c = @[1,2,3] for i in 0..2: echo a[i], b[i], c[i]
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Convert this Nim block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
let a = @['a','b','c'] b = @["A","B","C"] c = @[1,2,3] for i in 0..2: echo a[i], b[i], c[i]
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Nim to Java, same semantics.
let a = @['a','b','c'] b = @["A","B","C"] c = @[1,2,3] for i in 0..2: echo a[i], b[i], c[i]
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
let a = @['a','b','c'] b = @["A","B","C"] c = @[1,2,3] for i in 0..2: echo a[i], b[i], c[i]
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Nim.
let a = @['a','b','c'] b = @["A","B","C"] c = @[1,2,3] for i in 0..2: echo a[i], b[i], c[i]
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Translate the given Nim code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
let a = @['a','b','c'] b = @["A","B","C"] c = @[1,2,3] for i in 0..2: echo a[i], b[i], c[i]
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of OCaml, keeping it the same logically?
let a1 = [| 'a'; 'b'; 'c' |] and a2 = [| 'A'; 'B'; 'C' |] and a3 = [| '1'; '2'; '3' |] ;; Array.iteri (fun i c1 -> print_char c1; print_char a2.(i); print_char a3.(i); print_newline() ) a1 ;;
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in OCaml.
let a1 = [| 'a'; 'b'; 'c' |] and a2 = [| 'A'; 'B'; 'C' |] and a3 = [| '1'; '2'; '3' |] ;; Array.iteri (fun i c1 -> print_char c1; print_char a2.(i); print_char a3.(i); print_newline() ) a1 ;;
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this OCaml code.
let a1 = [| 'a'; 'b'; 'c' |] and a2 = [| 'A'; 'B'; 'C' |] and a3 = [| '1'; '2'; '3' |] ;; Array.iteri (fun i c1 -> print_char c1; print_char a2.(i); print_char a3.(i); print_newline() ) a1 ;;
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
let a1 = [| 'a'; 'b'; 'c' |] and a2 = [| 'A'; 'B'; 'C' |] and a3 = [| '1'; '2'; '3' |] ;; Array.iteri (fun i c1 -> print_char c1; print_char a2.(i); print_char a3.(i); print_newline() ) a1 ;;
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this OCaml implementation.
let a1 = [| 'a'; 'b'; 'c' |] and a2 = [| 'A'; 'B'; 'C' |] and a3 = [| '1'; '2'; '3' |] ;; Array.iteri (fun i c1 -> print_char c1; print_char a2.(i); print_char a3.(i); print_newline() ) a1 ;;
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Change the following OCaml code into VB without altering its purpose.
let a1 = [| 'a'; 'b'; 'c' |] and a2 = [| 'A'; 'B'; 'C' |] and a3 = [| '1'; '2'; '3' |] ;; Array.iteri (fun i c1 -> print_char c1; print_char a2.(i); print_char a3.(i); print_newline() ) a1 ;;
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from OCaml to Go without modifying what it does.
let a1 = [| 'a'; 'b'; 'c' |] and a2 = [| 'A'; 'B'; 'C' |] and a3 = [| '1'; '2'; '3' |] ;; Array.iteri (fun i c1 -> print_char c1; print_char a2.(i); print_char a3.(i); print_newline() ) a1 ;;
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Perl code.
sub zip (&@) { my $code = shift; my $min; $min = $min && $ for my $i(0..$min){ $code->(map $_->[$i] ,@_) } } my @a1 = qw( a b c ); my @a2 = qw( A B C ); my @a3 = qw( 1 2 3 ); zip { print @_,"\n" }\(@a1, @a2, @a3);
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Write a version of this Perl function in C# with identical behavior.
sub zip (&@) { my $code = shift; my $min; $min = $min && $ for my $i(0..$min){ $code->(map $_->[$i] ,@_) } } my @a1 = qw( a b c ); my @a2 = qw( A B C ); my @a3 = qw( 1 2 3 ); zip { print @_,"\n" }\(@a1, @a2, @a3);
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
sub zip (&@) { my $code = shift; my $min; $min = $min && $ for my $i(0..$min){ $code->(map $_->[$i] ,@_) } } my @a1 = qw( a b c ); my @a2 = qw( A B C ); my @a3 = qw( 1 2 3 ); zip { print @_,"\n" }\(@a1, @a2, @a3);
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Perl, keeping it the same logically?
sub zip (&@) { my $code = shift; my $min; $min = $min && $ for my $i(0..$min){ $code->(map $_->[$i] ,@_) } } my @a1 = qw( a b c ); my @a2 = qw( A B C ); my @a3 = qw( 1 2 3 ); zip { print @_,"\n" }\(@a1, @a2, @a3);
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Convert this Perl block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
sub zip (&@) { my $code = shift; my $min; $min = $min && $ for my $i(0..$min){ $code->(map $_->[$i] ,@_) } } my @a1 = qw( a b c ); my @a2 = qw( A B C ); my @a3 = qw( 1 2 3 ); zip { print @_,"\n" }\(@a1, @a2, @a3);
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Perl, keeping it the same logically?
sub zip (&@) { my $code = shift; my $min; $min = $min && $ for my $i(0..$min){ $code->(map $_->[$i] ,@_) } } my @a1 = qw( a b c ); my @a2 = qw( A B C ); my @a3 = qw( 1 2 3 ); zip { print @_,"\n" }\(@a1, @a2, @a3);
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Write a version of this Perl function in Go with identical behavior.
sub zip (&@) { my $code = shift; my $min; $min = $min && $ for my $i(0..$min){ $code->(map $_->[$i] ,@_) } } my @a1 = qw( a b c ); my @a2 = qw( A B C ); my @a3 = qw( 1 2 3 ); zip { print @_,"\n" }\(@a1, @a2, @a3);
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Change the following PowerShell code into C without altering its purpose.
function zip3 ($a1, $a2, $a3) { while ($a1) { $x, $a1 = $a1 $y, $a2 = $a2 $z, $a3 = $a3 [Tuple]::Create($x, $y, $z) } }
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Port the provided PowerShell code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
function zip3 ($a1, $a2, $a3) { while ($a1) { $x, $a1 = $a1 $y, $a2 = $a2 $z, $a3 = $a3 [Tuple]::Create($x, $y, $z) } }
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in PowerShell.
function zip3 ($a1, $a2, $a3) { while ($a1) { $x, $a1 = $a1 $y, $a2 = $a2 $z, $a3 = $a3 [Tuple]::Create($x, $y, $z) } }
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original PowerShell snippet.
function zip3 ($a1, $a2, $a3) { while ($a1) { $x, $a1 = $a1 $y, $a2 = $a2 $z, $a3 = $a3 [Tuple]::Create($x, $y, $z) } }
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in PowerShell.
function zip3 ($a1, $a2, $a3) { while ($a1) { $x, $a1 = $a1 $y, $a2 = $a2 $z, $a3 = $a3 [Tuple]::Create($x, $y, $z) } }
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original PowerShell code.
function zip3 ($a1, $a2, $a3) { while ($a1) { $x, $a1 = $a1 $y, $a2 = $a2 $z, $a3 = $a3 [Tuple]::Create($x, $y, $z) } }
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in PowerShell.
function zip3 ($a1, $a2, $a3) { while ($a1) { $x, $a1 = $a1 $y, $a2 = $a2 $z, $a3 = $a3 [Tuple]::Create($x, $y, $z) } }
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
multiloop <- function(...) { arguments <- lapply(list(...), as.character) lengths <- sapply(arguments, length) for(i in seq_len(max(lengths))) { for(j in seq_len(nargs())) { cat(ifelse(i <= lengths[j], arguments[[j]][i], " ")) } cat("\n") ...
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of R, keeping it the same logically?
multiloop <- function(...) { arguments <- lapply(list(...), as.character) lengths <- sapply(arguments, length) for(i in seq_len(max(lengths))) { for(j in seq_len(nargs())) { cat(ifelse(i <= lengths[j], arguments[[j]][i], " ")) } cat("\n") ...
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in R.
multiloop <- function(...) { arguments <- lapply(list(...), as.character) lengths <- sapply(arguments, length) for(i in seq_len(max(lengths))) { for(j in seq_len(nargs())) { cat(ifelse(i <= lengths[j], arguments[[j]][i], " ")) } cat("\n") ...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Convert this R snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
multiloop <- function(...) { arguments <- lapply(list(...), as.character) lengths <- sapply(arguments, length) for(i in seq_len(max(lengths))) { for(j in seq_len(nargs())) { cat(ifelse(i <= lengths[j], arguments[[j]][i], " ")) } cat("\n") ...
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
multiloop <- function(...) { arguments <- lapply(list(...), as.character) lengths <- sapply(arguments, length) for(i in seq_len(max(lengths))) { for(j in seq_len(nargs())) { cat(ifelse(i <= lengths[j], arguments[[j]][i], " ")) } cat("\n") ...
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Transform the following R implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
multiloop <- function(...) { arguments <- lapply(list(...), as.character) lengths <- sapply(arguments, length) for(i in seq_len(max(lengths))) { for(j in seq_len(nargs())) { cat(ifelse(i <= lengths[j], arguments[[j]][i], " ")) } cat("\n") ...
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Convert this R block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
multiloop <- function(...) { arguments <- lapply(list(...), as.character) lengths <- sapply(arguments, length) for(i in seq_len(max(lengths))) { for(j in seq_len(nargs())) { cat(ifelse(i <= lengths[j], arguments[[j]][i], " ")) } cat("\n") ...
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Generate an equivalent C version of this Racket code.
#lang racket (for ([x '(a b c)] [y #(A B C)] [z "123"] [i (in-naturals 1)]) (printf "~s: ~s ~s ~s\n" i x y z))
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Racket.
#lang racket (for ([x '(a b c)] [y #(A B C)] [z "123"] [i (in-naturals 1)]) (printf "~s: ~s ~s ~s\n" i x y z))
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Convert this Racket snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
#lang racket (for ([x '(a b c)] [y #(A B C)] [z "123"] [i (in-naturals 1)]) (printf "~s: ~s ~s ~s\n" i x y z))
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Change the programming language of this snippet from Racket to Java without modifying what it does.
#lang racket (for ([x '(a b c)] [y #(A B C)] [z "123"] [i (in-naturals 1)]) (printf "~s: ~s ~s ~s\n" i x y z))
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Port the following code from Racket to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
#lang racket (for ([x '(a b c)] [y #(A B C)] [z "123"] [i (in-naturals 1)]) (printf "~s: ~s ~s ~s\n" i x y z))
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Transform the following Racket implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
#lang racket (for ([x '(a b c)] [y #(A B C)] [z "123"] [i (in-naturals 1)]) (printf "~s: ~s ~s ~s\n" i x y z))
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Write a version of this Racket function in Go with identical behavior.
#lang racket (for ([x '(a b c)] [y #(A B C)] [z "123"] [i (in-naturals 1)]) (printf "~s: ~s ~s ~s\n" i x y z))
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Change the following COBOL code into C without altering its purpose.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. Loop-Over-Multiple-Tables. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 A VALUE "abc". 03 A-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 B VALUE "ABC". 03 B-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 C VALUE "123". 03 C-Va...
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this COBOL code in C#.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. Loop-Over-Multiple-Tables. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 A VALUE "abc". 03 A-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 B VALUE "ABC". 03 B-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 C VALUE "123". 03 C-Va...
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. Loop-Over-Multiple-Tables. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 A VALUE "abc". 03 A-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 B VALUE "ABC". 03 B-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 C VALUE "123". 03 C-Va...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Change the programming language of this snippet from COBOL to Java without modifying what it does.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. Loop-Over-Multiple-Tables. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 A VALUE "abc". 03 A-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 B VALUE "ABC". 03 B-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 C VALUE "123". 03 C-Va...
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from COBOL to Python, same semantics.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. Loop-Over-Multiple-Tables. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 A VALUE "abc". 03 A-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 B VALUE "ABC". 03 B-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 C VALUE "123". 03 C-Va...
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Port the following code from COBOL to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. Loop-Over-Multiple-Tables. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 A VALUE "abc". 03 A-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 B VALUE "ABC". 03 B-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 C VALUE "123". 03 C-Va...
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original COBOL code.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. Loop-Over-Multiple-Tables. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 A VALUE "abc". 03 A-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 B VALUE "ABC". 03 B-Vals PIC X OCCURS 3 TIMES. 01 C VALUE "123". 03 C-Va...
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Port the following code from REXX to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary say 'Using arrays' aa = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] bb = ['A', 'B', 'C'] cc = [1, 2, 3, 4] loop x_ = 0 for aa.length do ax = aa[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ax = ' ' end do bx = bb[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExcepti...
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Generate a C# translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary say 'Using arrays' aa = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] bb = ['A', 'B', 'C'] cc = [1, 2, 3, 4] loop x_ = 0 for aa.length do ax = aa[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ax = ' ' end do bx = bb[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExcepti...
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Write a version of this REXX function in C++ with identical behavior.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary say 'Using arrays' aa = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] bb = ['A', 'B', 'C'] cc = [1, 2, 3, 4] loop x_ = 0 for aa.length do ax = aa[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ax = ' ' end do bx = bb[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExcepti...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Transform the following REXX implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary say 'Using arrays' aa = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] bb = ['A', 'B', 'C'] cc = [1, 2, 3, 4] loop x_ = 0 for aa.length do ax = aa[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ax = ' ' end do bx = bb[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExcepti...
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Change the programming language of this snippet from REXX to Python without modifying what it does.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary say 'Using arrays' aa = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] bb = ['A', 'B', 'C'] cc = [1, 2, 3, 4] loop x_ = 0 for aa.length do ax = aa[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ax = ' ' end do bx = bb[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExcepti...
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Translate the given REXX code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary say 'Using arrays' aa = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] bb = ['A', 'B', 'C'] cc = [1, 2, 3, 4] loop x_ = 0 for aa.length do ax = aa[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ax = ' ' end do bx = bb[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExcepti...
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Write the same code in Go as shown below in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary say 'Using arrays' aa = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] bb = ['A', 'B', 'C'] cc = [1, 2, 3, 4] loop x_ = 0 for aa.length do ax = aa[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ax = ' ' end do bx = bb[x_] catch ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExcepti...
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Port the following code from Ruby to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
['a','b','c'].zip(['A','B','C'], [1,2,3]) {|i,j,k| puts "
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Generate an equivalent C# version of this Ruby code.
['a','b','c'].zip(['A','B','C'], [1,2,3]) {|i,j,k| puts "
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Convert this Ruby block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
['a','b','c'].zip(['A','B','C'], [1,2,3]) {|i,j,k| puts "
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ruby to Java without modifying what it does.
['a','b','c'].zip(['A','B','C'], [1,2,3]) {|i,j,k| puts "
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Convert the following code from Ruby to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
['a','b','c'].zip(['A','B','C'], [1,2,3]) {|i,j,k| puts "
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Convert this Ruby snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
['a','b','c'].zip(['A','B','C'], [1,2,3]) {|i,j,k| puts "
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
['a','b','c'].zip(['A','B','C'], [1,2,3]) {|i,j,k| puts "
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }
Convert this Scala snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
("abc", "ABC", "123").zipped foreach { (x, y, z) => println(x.toString + y + z) }
#include <stdio.h> char a1[] = {'a','b','c'}; char a2[] = {'A','B','C'}; int a3[] = {1,2,3}; int main(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { printf("%c%c%i\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]); } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Scala to C# without modifying what it does.
("abc", "ABC", "123").zipped foreach { (x, y, z) => println(x.toString + y + z) }
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { char[] a = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; char[] b = { 'A', 'B', 'C' }; int[] c = { 1, 2, 3 }; int min = Math.Min(a.Length, b.Length); min = Math.Min(min, c.Length); for (int i = 0; i < min; i++) Console.WriteLine(...
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Scala snippet.
("abc", "ABC", "123").zipped foreach { (x, y, z) => println(x.toString + y + z) }
#include <iostream> #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::vector<char> ls(3); ls[0] = 'a'; ls[1] = 'b'; ls[2] = 'c'; std::vector<char> us(3); us[0] = 'A'; us[1] = 'B'; us[2] = 'C'; std::vector<int> ns(3); ns[0] = 1; ns[1] = 2; ns[2] = 3; std::vector<char>::const_iterator lIt = ls....
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
("abc", "ABC", "123").zipped foreach { (x, y, z) => println(x.toString + y + z) }
module LoopOverMultipleArrays { @Inject Console console; void run() { Char[] chars = ['a', 'b', 'c']; String[] strings = ["A", "B", "C"]; Int[] ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; console.print("Using array indexing:"); for (Int i = 0, Int longest = chars.size...
Port the following code from Scala to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
("abc", "ABC", "123").zipped foreach { (x, y, z) => println(x.toString + y + z) }
>>> print ( '\n'.join(''.join(x) for x in zip('abc', 'ABC', '123')) ) aA1 bB2 cC3 >>>
Change the following Scala code into VB without altering its purpose.
("abc", "ABC", "123").zipped foreach { (x, y, z) => println(x.toString + y + z) }
Module Program Sub Main() Dim a As Char() = {"a"c, "b"c, "c"c} Dim b As Char() = {"A"c, "B"c, "C"c} Dim c As Integer() = {1, 2, 3} Dim minLength = {a.Length, b.Length, c.Length}.Min() For i = 0 To minLength - 1 Console.WriteLine(a(i) & b(i) & c(i)) Next ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to Go, same semantics.
("abc", "ABC", "123").zipped foreach { (x, y, z) => println(x.toString + y + z) }
package main import "fmt" var a1 = []string{"a", "b", "c"} var a2 = []byte{'A', 'B', 'C'} var a3 = []int{1, 2, 3} func main() { for i := range a1 { fmt.Printf("%v%c%v\n", a1[i], a2[i], a3[i]) } }