Instruction stringlengths 45 106 | input_code stringlengths 1 13.7k | output_code stringlengths 1 13.7k |
|---|---|---|
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Scala. |
typealias Func = (Int) -> IntArray
fun calc(f: Func, n: Int): Double {
var temp = 0.0
for (i in n downTo 1) {
val p = f(i)
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp)
}
return f(0)[0] + temp
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val pList = listOf<Pair<String, Func>>(
"sqrt(2)" to { n -> int... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Scala code. |
typealias Func = (Int) -> IntArray
fun calc(f: Func, n: Int): Double {
var temp = 0.0
for (i in n downTo 1) {
val p = f(i)
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp)
}
return f(0)[0] + temp
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val pList = listOf<Pair<String, Func>>(
"sqrt(2)" to { n -> int... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Port the following code from Scala to VB with equivalent syntax and logic. |
typealias Func = (Int) -> IntArray
fun calc(f: Func, n: Int): Double {
var temp = 0.0
for (i in n downTo 1) {
val p = f(i)
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp)
}
return f(0)[0] + temp
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val pList = listOf<Pair<String, Func>>(
"sqrt(2)" to { n -> int... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Convert this Scala snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent. |
typealias Func = (Int) -> IntArray
fun calc(f: Func, n: Int): Double {
var temp = 0.0
for (i in n downTo 1) {
val p = f(i)
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp)
}
return f(0)[0] + temp
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val pList = listOf<Pair<String, Func>>(
"sqrt(2)" to { n -> int... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Generate a Go translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps. |
typealias Func = (Int) -> IntArray
fun calc(f: Func, n: Int): Double {
var temp = 0.0
for (i in n downTo 1) {
val p = f(i)
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp)
}
return f(0)[0] + temp
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val pList = listOf<Pair<String, Func>>(
"sqrt(2)" to { n -> int... | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... |
Convert the following code from Scala to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact. |
typealias Func = (Int) -> IntArray
fun calc(f: Func, n: Int): Double {
var temp = 0.0
for (i in n downTo 1) {
val p = f(i)
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp)
}
return f(0)[0] + temp
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val pList = listOf<Pair<String, Func>>(
"sqrt(2)" to { n -> int... | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... |
Port the following code from Swift to C with equivalent syntax and logic. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... |
#include <stdio.h>
typedef double (*coeff_func)(unsigned n);
double calc(coeff_func f_a, coeff_func f_b, unsigned expansions)
{
double a, b, r;
a = b = r = 0.0;
unsigned i;
for (i = expansions; i > 0; i--) {
a = f_a(i);
b = f_b(i);
r = b / (a + r);
}
a = f_a(0);
return a + r;
}
double sqrt2_a(unsi... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... |
#include <stdio.h>
typedef double (*coeff_func)(unsigned n);
double calc(coeff_func f_a, coeff_func f_b, unsigned expansions)
{
double a, b, r;
a = b = r = 0.0;
unsigned i;
for (i = expansions; i > 0; i--) {
a = f_a(i);
b = f_b(i);
r = b / (a + r);
}
a = f_a(0);
return a + r;
}
double sqrt2_a(unsi... |
Translate the given Swift code snippet into C# without altering its behavior. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ContinuedFraction {
class Program {
static double Calc(Func<int, int[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0.0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
int[] p = f(ni);
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp);
... |
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Swift. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ContinuedFraction {
class Program {
static double Calc(Func<int, int[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0.0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
int[] p = f(ni);
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp);
... |
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original Swift code. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | #include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
typedef std::tuple<double,double> coeff_t;
typedef coeff_t (*func_t)(int);
double calc(func_t func, int n)
{
double a, b, temp = 0;
for (; n > 0; --n) {
std::tie(a, b) = func(n);
temp = b / (a + temp);
}
std::tie(a, b) = func(0)... |
Convert this Swift snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | #include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
typedef std::tuple<double,double> coeff_t;
typedef coeff_t (*func_t)(int);
double calc(func_t func, int n)
{
double a, b, temp = 0;
for (; n > 0; --n) {
std::tie(a, b) = func(n);
temp = b / (a + temp);
}
std::tie(a, b) = func(0)... |
Translate the given Swift code snippet into Java without altering its behavior. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Test {
static double calc(Function<Integer, Integer[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
Integer[] p = f.apply(ni);
temp = p[1] / (double) (p[... |
Generate an equivalent Java version of this Swift code. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Test {
static double calc(Function<Integer, Integer[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
Integer[] p = f.apply(ni);
temp = p[1] / (double) (p[... |
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Swift code. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Port the following code from Swift to Python with equivalent syntax and logic. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Port the provided Swift code into VB while preserving the original functionality. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Port the following code from Swift to VB with equivalent syntax and logic. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Swift code. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... |
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go. | extension BinaryInteger {
@inlinable
public func power(_ n: Self) -> Self {
return stride(from: 0, to: n, by: 1).lazy.map({_ in self }).reduce(1, *)
}
}
public struct CycledSequence<WrappedSequence: Sequence> {
private var seq: WrappedSequence
private var iter: WrappedSequence.Iterator
init(seq: Wrapp... | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... |
Generate an equivalent C version of this Tcl code. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... |
#include <stdio.h>
typedef double (*coeff_func)(unsigned n);
double calc(coeff_func f_a, coeff_func f_b, unsigned expansions)
{
double a, b, r;
a = b = r = 0.0;
unsigned i;
for (i = expansions; i > 0; i--) {
a = f_a(i);
b = f_b(i);
r = b / (a + r);
}
a = f_a(0);
return a + r;
}
double sqrt2_a(unsi... |
Port the following code from Tcl to C with equivalent syntax and logic. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... |
#include <stdio.h>
typedef double (*coeff_func)(unsigned n);
double calc(coeff_func f_a, coeff_func f_b, unsigned expansions)
{
double a, b, r;
a = b = r = 0.0;
unsigned i;
for (i = expansions; i > 0; i--) {
a = f_a(i);
b = f_b(i);
r = b / (a + r);
}
a = f_a(0);
return a + r;
}
double sqrt2_a(unsi... |
Convert the following code from Tcl to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ContinuedFraction {
class Program {
static double Calc(Func<int, int[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0.0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
int[] p = f(ni);
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp);
... |
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Tcl. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ContinuedFraction {
class Program {
static double Calc(Func<int, int[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0.0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
int[] p = f(ni);
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp);
... |
Transform the following Tcl implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | #include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
typedef std::tuple<double,double> coeff_t;
typedef coeff_t (*func_t)(int);
double calc(func_t func, int n)
{
double a, b, temp = 0;
for (; n > 0; --n) {
std::tie(a, b) = func(n);
temp = b / (a + temp);
}
std::tie(a, b) = func(0)... |
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | #include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
typedef std::tuple<double,double> coeff_t;
typedef coeff_t (*func_t)(int);
double calc(func_t func, int n)
{
double a, b, temp = 0;
for (; n > 0; --n) {
std::tie(a, b) = func(n);
temp = b / (a + temp);
}
std::tie(a, b) = func(0)... |
Convert this Tcl snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Test {
static double calc(Function<Integer, Integer[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
Integer[] p = f.apply(ni);
temp = p[1] / (double) (p[... |
Transform the following Tcl implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Test {
static double calc(Function<Integer, Integer[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
Integer[] p = f.apply(ni);
temp = p[1] / (double) (p[... |
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in Tcl. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Tcl code. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Ensure the translated VB code behaves exactly like the original Tcl snippet. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to VB. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to Go. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... |
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into Go without altering its behavior. | package require Tcl 8.6
proc r2 {} {
yield {1 1}
while 1 {yield {2 1}}
}
proc e {} {
yield {2 1}
while 1 {yield [list [incr n] $n]}
}
proc pi {} {
set n 0; set a 3
while 1 {
yield [list $a [expr {(2*[incr n]-1)**2}]]
set a 6
}
}
proc cf {generator {termCount 50}} {
set terms [... | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... |
Write the same algorithm in Rust as shown in this C implementation. |
#include <stdio.h>
typedef double (*coeff_func)(unsigned n);
double calc(coeff_func f_a, coeff_func f_b, unsigned expansions)
{
double a, b, r;
a = b = r = 0.0;
unsigned i;
for (i = expansions; i > 0; i--) {
a = f_a(i);
b = f_b(i);
r = b / (a + r);
}
a = f_a(0);
return a + r;
}
double sqrt2_a(unsi... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Translate this program into Rust but keep the logic exactly as in C. |
#include <stdio.h>
typedef double (*coeff_func)(unsigned n);
double calc(coeff_func f_a, coeff_func f_b, unsigned expansions)
{
double a, b, r;
a = b = r = 0.0;
unsigned i;
for (i = expansions; i > 0; i--) {
a = f_a(i);
b = f_b(i);
r = b / (a + r);
}
a = f_a(0);
return a + r;
}
double sqrt2_a(unsi... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from C++ to Rust. | #include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
typedef std::tuple<double,double> coeff_t;
typedef coeff_t (*func_t)(int);
double calc(func_t func, int n)
{
double a, b, temp = 0;
for (; n > 0; --n) {
std::tie(a, b) = func(n);
temp = b / (a + temp);
}
std::tie(a, b) = func(0)... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Rewrite the snippet below in Rust so it works the same as the original C++ code. | #include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
typedef std::tuple<double,double> coeff_t;
typedef coeff_t (*func_t)(int);
double calc(func_t func, int n)
{
double a, b, temp = 0;
for (; n > 0; --n) {
std::tie(a, b) = func(n);
temp = b / (a + temp);
}
std::tie(a, b) = func(0)... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Convert the following code from C# to Rust, ensuring the logic remains intact. | using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ContinuedFraction {
class Program {
static double Calc(Func<int, int[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0.0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
int[] p = f(ni);
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp);
... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Translate this program into Rust but keep the logic exactly as in C#. | using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ContinuedFraction {
class Program {
static double Calc(Func<int, int[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0.0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
int[] p = f(ni);
temp = p[1] / (p[0] + temp);
... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Translate the given Java code snippet into Rust without altering its behavior. | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Test {
static double calc(Function<Integer, Integer[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
Integer[] p = f.apply(ni);
temp = p[1] / (double) (p[... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Write the same code in Rust as shown below in Java. | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Test {
static double calc(Function<Integer, Integer[]> f, int n) {
double temp = 0;
for (int ni = n; ni >= 1; ni--) {
Integer[] p = f.apply(ni);
temp = p[1] / (double) (p[... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Change the following Go code into Rust without altering its purpose. | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Change the programming language of this snippet from Go to Rust without modifying what it does. | package main
import "fmt"
type cfTerm struct {
a, b int
}
type cf []cfTerm
func cfSqrt2(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] = cfTerm{2, 1}
}
f[0].a = 1
return f
}
func cfNap(nTerms int) cf {
f := make(cf, nTerms)
for n := range f {
f[n] =... | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... |
Convert this Rust block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic. | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Rust. | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Port the following code from Rust to VB with equivalent syntax and logic. | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... | Public Const precision = 10000
Private Function continued_fraction(steps As Integer, rid_a As String, rid_b As String) As Double
Dim res As Double
res = 0
For n = steps To 1 Step -1
res = Application.Run(rid_b, n) / (Application.Run(rid_a, n) + res)
Next n
continued_fraction = Application.Run... |
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Rust code. | use std::iter;
macro_rules! continued_fraction {
($a:expr, $b:expr ; $iterations:expr) => (
($a).zip($b)
.take($iterations)
.collect::<Vec<_>>().iter()
.rev()
.fold(0 as f64, |acc: f64, &(x, y)| {
x as f64 + (y as f64 / acc)
... | from fractions import Fraction
import itertools
try: zip = itertools.izip
except: pass
def CF(a, b, t):
terms = list(itertools.islice(zip(a, b), t))
z = Fraction(1,1)
for a, b in reversed(terms):
z = a + b / z
return z
def pRes(x, d):
q, x = divmod(x, 1)
res = str(q)
res += "."
for i in range(... |
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original Ada code. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ada to C, same semantics. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Generate an equivalent C version of this Ada code. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Convert the following code from Ada to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Change the following Ada code into C++ without altering its purpose. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Ada snippet. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\taΒ := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n"
fmt.Printf(a, a)
}
|
Convert this Ada snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\taΒ := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n"
fmt.Printf(a, a)
}
|
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to Java without modifying what it does. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Port the provided Ada code into Java while preserving the original functionality. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Ada snippet. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ada to Python, same semantics. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Convert this Ada block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| Public Sub quine()
quote = Chr(34)
comma = Chr(44)
cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)
n = Array( _
"Public Sub quine()", _
" quote = Chr(34)", _
" comma = Chr(44)", _
" cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _
" n = Array( _", _
" For i = 0 To 4", _
" Debug.Print n(i)", _
" Next i", _
" For i = 0 ... |
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to VB without modifying what it does. | with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='"';A:String:="with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Self is Q:Character:='';A:String:=;begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;";begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(A(1..49)&Q&A(50..61)&Q&A&Q&A(62..A'Last));end Self;
| Public Sub quine()
quote = Chr(34)
comma = Chr(44)
cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)
n = Array( _
"Public Sub quine()", _
" quote = Chr(34)", _
" comma = Chr(44)", _
" cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _
" n = Array( _", _
" For i = 0 To 4", _
" Debug.Print n(i)", _
" Next i", _
" For i = 0 ... |
Write a version of this Arturo function in C with identical behavior. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Generate an equivalent C version of this Arturo code. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Arturo. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Arturo. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Convert the following code from Arturo to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Please provide an equivalent version of this Arturo code in Java. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Port the following code from Arturo to Java with equivalent syntax and logic. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Convert this Arturo snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Arturo. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Arturo to VB, same semantics. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| Public Sub quine()
quote = Chr(34)
comma = Chr(44)
cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)
n = Array( _
"Public Sub quine()", _
" quote = Chr(34)", _
" comma = Chr(44)", _
" cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _
" n = Array( _", _
" For i = 0 To 4", _
" Debug.Print n(i)", _
" Next i", _
" For i = 0 ... |
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Arturo. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| Public Sub quine()
quote = Chr(34)
comma = Chr(44)
cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)
n = Array( _
"Public Sub quine()", _
" quote = Chr(34)", _
" comma = Chr(44)", _
" cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _
" n = Array( _", _
" For i = 0 To 4", _
" Debug.Print n(i)", _
" Next i", _
" For i = 0 ... |
Convert the following code from Arturo to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\taΒ := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n"
fmt.Printf(a, a)
}
|
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go. | block: [print ["block:" as .code block "do block"]] do block
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\taΒ := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n"
fmt.Printf(a, a)
}
|
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original AutoHotKey snippet. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Write a version of this AutoHotKey function in C with identical behavior. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Transform the following AutoHotKey implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Transform the following AutoHotKey implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Translate the given AutoHotKey code snippet into Java without altering its behavior. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Write a version of this AutoHotKey function in Python with identical behavior. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Generate an equivalent VB version of this AutoHotKey code. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| Public Sub quine()
quote = Chr(34)
comma = Chr(44)
cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)
n = Array( _
"Public Sub quine()", _
" quote = Chr(34)", _
" comma = Chr(44)", _
" cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _
" n = Array( _", _
" For i = 0 To 4", _
" Debug.Print n(i)", _
" Next i", _
" For i = 0 ... |
Convert this AutoHotKey snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| Public Sub quine()
quote = Chr(34)
comma = Chr(44)
cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)
n = Array( _
"Public Sub quine()", _
" quote = Chr(34)", _
" comma = Chr(44)", _
" cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _
" n = Array( _", _
" For i = 0 To 4", _
" Debug.Print n(i)", _
" Next i", _
" For i = 0 ... |
Generate a Go translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\taΒ := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n"
fmt.Printf(a, a)
}
|
Generate a Go translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps. | FileRead, quine, %A_ScriptFullPath%
MsgBox % quine
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\taΒ := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n"
fmt.Printf(a, a)
}
|
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this AWK implementation. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the AWK version. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| #include <stdio.h>
static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\"";
int main(void) {
const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0... |
Translate the given AWK code snippet into C# without altering its behavior. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Convert this AWK block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
|
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in AWK. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from AWK to C++. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| #include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio>
int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
|
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original AWK snippet. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| module test
{
@Inject Console console;
void run()
{
console.print($./test.x);
}
}
|
Port the provided AWK code into Python while preserving the original functionality. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Generate a Python translation of this AWK snippet without changing its computational steps. | BEGIN{c="BEGIN{c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c,34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
| w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)"
print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.