Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
x="println(\"x=\$(repr(x))\\n\$x\")" println("x=$(repr(x))\n$x")
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Lua snippet.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Generate a C translation of this Lua snippet without changing its computational steps.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Lua implementation.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Lua.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Port the following code from Lua to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Convert the following code from Lua to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Lua implementation.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Change the following Lua code into Java without altering its purpose.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Port the provided Lua code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Lua.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Lua to VB.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Lua.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Generate a Go translation of this Lua snippet without changing its computational steps.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Lua code.
s=[[io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)]];io.write('s=[','[',s,']','];',s)
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this Mathematica implementation.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Mathematica.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to C#, same semantics.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original Mathematica code.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Port the following code from Mathematica to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to C++, same semantics.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Generate a Java translation of this Mathematica snippet without changing its computational steps.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Transform the following Mathematica implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write a version of this Mathematica function in Python with identical behavior.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Change the programming language of this snippet from Mathematica to Python without modifying what it does.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Mathematica version.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Write a version of this Mathematica function in VB with identical behavior.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Mathematica.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Translate the given Mathematica code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
a="Print[\"a=\",InputForm[a],\";\",a]";Print["a=",InputForm[a],";",a]
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the MATLAB version.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Generate a C translation of this MATLAB snippet without changing its computational steps.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Generate an equivalent C# version of this MATLAB code.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Convert this MATLAB snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this MATLAB code.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this MATLAB implementation.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in MATLAB.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this MATLAB code in Java.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original MATLAB snippet.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Write a version of this MATLAB function in Python with identical behavior.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Translate the given MATLAB code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Write the same algorithm in VB as shown in this MATLAB implementation.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in MATLAB.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Translate the given MATLAB code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
x='{>\(y>(((-y-(((<(^<ejtq)\{-y.2^*<';z=['x=''',x,''';'];disp([z,x-1]);
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Nim code.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Generate a C translation of this Nim snippet without changing its computational steps.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Port the following code from Nim to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Nim.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in Nim.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Nim version.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Port the following code from Nim to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Please provide an equivalent version of this Nim code in Python.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Convert the following code from Nim to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Convert the following code from Nim to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Convert this Nim block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Convert this Nim block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
var x = "var x = echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]" echo x[0..7],chr(34),x,chr(34),chr(10),x[8 .. ^1]
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Change the following OCaml code into C without altering its purpose.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Please provide an equivalent version of this OCaml code in C.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Generate an equivalent C# version of this OCaml code.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Change the following OCaml code into C# without altering its purpose.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original OCaml snippet.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the OCaml version.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of OCaml, keeping it the same logically?
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in OCaml.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Port the following code from OCaml to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Please provide an equivalent version of this OCaml code in Python.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Generate a VB translation of this OCaml snippet without changing its computational steps.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Translate the given OCaml code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original OCaml snippet.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original OCaml snippet.
class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s := "class Program { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { s :=; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print(s)->Print(34->As(Char))->PrintLine(s->SubString(61, 129)); } }"; IO.Console->Print(s->SubString(61))->Print(34->As(Char))->Print...
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Write the same code in C as shown below in Pascal.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Pascal to C.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Write a version of this Pascal function in C# with identical behavior.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Pascal to C#.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Convert this Pascal block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Pascal.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Pascal.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Pascal implementation.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Convert this Pascal snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Please provide an equivalent version of this Pascal code in Python.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Convert the following code from Pascal to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Convert this Pascal snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Translate the given Pascal code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Pascal.
const s=';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.';begin writeln(#99#111#110#115#116#32#115#61#39,s,#39,s)end.
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Port the following code from Perl to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Convert the following code from Perl to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Perl to C#, same semantics.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Generate an equivalent C# version of this Perl code.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Transform the following Perl implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Perl.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Convert the following code from Perl to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Perl.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Perl code in Python.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Perl snippet.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Generate a VB translation of this Perl snippet without changing its computational steps.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Generate an equivalent VB version of this Perl code.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Change the following Perl code into Go without altering its purpose.
$s = q($s = q(%s); printf($s, $s); ); printf($s, $s);
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of PowerShell, keeping it the same logically?
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...