Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Convert this PowerShell block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Rewrite this program in C# while keeping its functionality equivalent to the PowerShell version.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original PowerShell snippet.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Please provide an equivalent version of this PowerShell code in C++.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Transform the following PowerShell implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write a version of this PowerShell function in Java with identical behavior.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Generate a Python translation of this PowerShell snippet without changing its computational steps.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Convert this PowerShell block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Generate an equivalent VB version of this PowerShell code.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Produce a functionally identical VB code for the snippet given in PowerShell.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Convert this PowerShell block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from PowerShell to Go, same semantics.
$S = '$S = $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)' $S.Substring(0,5) + [string][char]39 + $S + [string][char]39 + [string][char]10 + $S.Substring(5)
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in R.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Generate a C translation of this R snippet without changing its computational steps.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original R snippet.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Generate a C# translation of this R snippet without changing its computational steps.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Translate the given R code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of R, keeping it the same logically?
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Convert this R block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from R to Java without modifying what it does.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write the same code in Python as shown below in R.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Write the same code in Python as shown below in R.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Convert the following code from R to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the R version.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from R to Go, same semantics.
(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-"(function(){x<-intToUtf8(34);s<-%s%s%s;cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()";cat(sprintf(s,x,s,x))})()
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Racket code.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Convert this Racket block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Racket.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Racket.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Convert this Racket snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Convert the following code from Racket to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in Racket.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Convert this Racket snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Generate an equivalent VB version of this Racket code.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Racket, keeping it the same logically?
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Generate a Go translation of this Racket snippet without changing its computational steps.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original COBOL snippet.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Change the following COBOL code into C# without altering its purpose.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Transform the following COBOL implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from COBOL to C++, same semantics.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from COBOL to C++, same semantics.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Convert this COBOL block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Convert the following code from COBOL to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Generate an equivalent Python version of this COBOL code.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Convert the following code from COBOL to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Generate a VB translation of this COBOL snippet without changing its computational steps.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of COBOL, keeping it the same logically?
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original COBOL code.
linkage section. 78 c value "display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.". display 'linkage section. 78 c value ' x'22' c x'222e20' c.
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Change the following REXX code into C without altering its purpose.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Please provide an equivalent version of this REXX code in C.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from REXX to C++, same semantics.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from REXX to C++.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Change the programming language of this snippet from REXX to Java without modifying what it does.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this REXX implementation.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Generate an equivalent VB version of this REXX code.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Produce a functionally identical VB code for the snippet given in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this REXX implementation.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Generate a Go translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary Q = "'" S = "\\" N = "\n" A = "&" code = [ - ' 'options replace format comments java crossref savelog symbols nobinary', - '', - 'Q = "&QS"', - 'S = "&ESC"', - 'N = "&NL"', - 'A = "&AMP"', - 'code = [ -', - '&REP', - ' ]', - ...
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Convert the following code from Ruby to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Ruby.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Ruby snippet.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Generate a Java translation of this Ruby snippet without changing its computational steps.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Ruby.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Convert this Ruby snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ruby code in VB.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ruby code in VB.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in Ruby.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Convert this Ruby snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent.
_="_=%p;puts _%%_";puts _%_
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Scala version.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Scala, keeping it the same logically?
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Scala, keeping it the same logically?
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Convert this Scala block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Scala.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Scala.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(#include<cstdio> int main(){char n[]=R"(%s%c";printf(n,n,41);})";printf(n,n,41);}
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Scala version.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Port the provided Scala code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
module test { @Inject Console console; void run() { console.print($./test.x); } }
Write a version of this Scala function in Python with identical behavior.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Change the programming language of this snippet from Scala to Python without modifying what it does.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
w = "print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)" print('w = ' + chr(34) + w + chr(34) + chr(10) + w)
Generate an equivalent VB version of this Scala code.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Scala to VB without modifying what it does.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
Public Sub quine() quote = Chr(34) comma = Chr(44) cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95) n = Array( _ "Public Sub quine()", _ " quote = Chr(34)", _ " comma = Chr(44)", _ " cont = Chr(32) & Chr(95)", _ " n = Array( _", _ " For i = 0 To 4", _ " Debug.Print n(i)", _ " Next i", _ " For i = 0 ...
Transform the following Scala implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Scala code.
const val F = """ const val F = %c%c%c%s%c%c%c fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) } """ fun main(args: Array<String>) { System.out.printf(F, 34, 34, 34, F, 34, 34, 34) }
package main import "fmt" func main() { a := "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n\ta := %q\n\tfmt.Printf(a, a)\n}\n" fmt.Printf(a, a) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
({print($0+$0.debugDescription+")")})("({print($0+$0.debugDescription+\")\")})(")
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Swift code in C.
({print($0+$0.debugDescription+")")})("({print($0+$0.debugDescription+\")\")})(")
#include <stdio.h> static char sym[] = "\n\t\\\""; int main(void) { const char *code = "#include <stdio.h>%c%cstatic char sym[] = %c%cn%ct%c%c%c%c%c;%c%cint main(void) {%c%cconst char *code = %c%s%c;%c%cprintf(code, sym[0], sym[0], sym[3], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[2], sym[3], sym[3], sym[0], sym[0], sym[0...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Swift, keeping it the same logically?
({print($0+$0.debugDescription+")")})("({print($0+$0.debugDescription+\")\")})(")
class Program { static void Main() { var s = "class Program {{ static void Main() {{ var s = {0}{1}{0}; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); }} }}"; System.Console.WriteLine(s, (char)34, s); } }