Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Change the following REXX code into Python without altering its purpose.
parse arg target stopAt chunkette . if target=='' | target=="," then target= 0 if stopAt=='' | stopAt=="," then stopAt= 1 y= 0 zz= 'archbishop -915 covariate 590 mycenae 183 brute 870 balm 397 fiat 170' , 'smokescreen 423 eradicate 376 efferent 54 bonnet 452 vein ...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this REXX implementation.
parse arg target stopAt chunkette . if target=='' | target=="," then target= 0 if stopAt=='' | stopAt=="," then stopAt= 1 y= 0 zz= 'archbishop -915 covariate 590 mycenae 183 brute 870 balm 397 fiat 170' , 'smokescreen 423 eradicate 376 efferent 54 bonnet 452 vein ...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Transform the following REXX implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
parse arg target stopAt chunkette . if target=='' | target=="," then target= 0 if stopAt=='' | stopAt=="," then stopAt= 1 y= 0 zz= 'archbishop -915 covariate 590 mycenae 183 brute 870 balm 397 fiat 170' , 'smokescreen 423 eradicate 376 efferent 54 bonnet 452 vein ...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Translate the given REXX code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
parse arg target stopAt chunkette . if target=='' | target=="," then target= 0 if stopAt=='' | stopAt=="," then stopAt= 1 y= 0 zz= 'archbishop -915 covariate 590 mycenae 183 brute 870 balm 397 fiat 170' , 'smokescreen 423 eradicate 376 efferent 54 bonnet 452 vein ...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Ruby code.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct { char *word; int weight; } item_t; item_t items[] = { {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ruby to C without modifying what it does.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct { char *word; int weight; } item_t; item_t items[] = { {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {...
Generate a C# translation of this Ruby snippet without changing its computational steps.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace SubsetSum { class Item { public Item(string word, int weight) { Word = word; Weight = weight; } public string Word { get; set; } public int Weight { get; set; } public override string ToStrin...
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Ruby.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace SubsetSum { class Item { public Item(string word, int weight) { Word = word; Weight = weight; } public string Word { get; set; } public int Weight { get; set; } public override string ToStrin...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const std::string& str) { return out << str.c_str(); } std::vector<std::pair<std::string, int>> items{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", ...
Port the provided Ruby code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const std::string& str) { return out << str.c_str(); } std::vector<std::pair<std::string, int>> items{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", ...
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in Ruby.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
public class SubsetSum { private static class Item { private String word; private int weight; public Item(String word, int weight) { this.word = word; this.weight = weight; } @Override public String toString() { return String.form...
Generate an equivalent Java version of this Ruby code.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
public class SubsetSum { private static class Item { private String word; private int weight; public Item(String word, int weight) { this.word = word; this.weight = weight; } @Override public String toString() { return String.form...
Generate a Python translation of this Ruby snippet without changing its computational steps.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ruby to Python.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ruby code in Go.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ruby to Go without modifying what it does.
weights = { 'alliance' =>-624, 'archbishop'=>-915, 'balm' => 397, 'bonnet' => 452, 'brute' => 870, 'centipede' =>-658, 'cobol' => 362, 'covariate'=> 590, 'departure' => 952, 'deploy' => 44, 'diophantine'=> 645, 'efferent' => 54, 'elysee' =>-326, 'eradicate' => 376, 'escritoire' => ...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Port the provided Scala code into C while preserving the original functionality.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct { char *word; int weight; } item_t; item_t items[] = { {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in Scala.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct { char *word; int weight; } item_t; item_t items[] = { {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {...
Convert this Scala snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace SubsetSum { class Item { public Item(string word, int weight) { Word = word; Weight = weight; } public string Word { get; set; } public int Weight { get; set; } public override string ToStrin...
Generate an equivalent C# version of this Scala code.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace SubsetSum { class Item { public Item(string word, int weight) { Word = word; Weight = weight; } public string Word { get; set; } public int Weight { get; set; } public override string ToStrin...
Transform the following Scala implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const std::string& str) { return out << str.c_str(); } std::vector<std::pair<std::string, int>> items{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", ...
Generate a C++ translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const std::string& str) { return out << str.c_str(); } std::vector<std::pair<std::string, int>> items{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", ...
Port the following code from Scala to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
public class SubsetSum { private static class Item { private String word; private int weight; public Item(String word, int weight) { this.word = word; this.weight = weight; } @Override public String toString() { return String.form...
Convert the following code from Scala to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
public class SubsetSum { private static class Item { private String word; private int weight; public Item(String word, int weight) { this.word = word; this.weight = weight; } @Override public String toString() { return String.form...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Scala implementation.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Convert the following code from Scala to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Port the provided Scala code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Convert this Scala block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
class Item(val word: String, val weight: Int) { override fun toString() = "($word $weight)" } val items = arrayOf( Item("alliance", -624), Item("archbishop", -915), Item("balm", 397), Item("bonnet", 452), Item("brute", 870), Item("centipede", -658), Item("cobol",...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to C.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct { char *word; int weight; } item_t; item_t items[] = { {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {...
Port the following code from Tcl to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct { char *word; int weight; } item_t; item_t items[] = { {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Tcl, keeping it the same logically?
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace SubsetSum { class Item { public Item(string word, int weight) { Word = word; Weight = weight; } public string Word { get; set; } public int Weight { get; set; } public override string ToStrin...
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Tcl snippet.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace SubsetSum { class Item { public Item(string word, int weight) { Word = word; Weight = weight; } public string Word { get; set; } public int Weight { get; set; } public override string ToStrin...
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const std::string& str) { return out << str.c_str(); } std::vector<std::pair<std::string, int>> items{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", ...
Convert the following code from Tcl to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
#include <iostream> #include <vector> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const std::string& str) { return out << str.c_str(); } std::vector<std::pair<std::string, int>> items{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", ...
Convert this Tcl block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
public class SubsetSum { private static class Item { private String word; private int weight; public Item(String word, int weight) { this.word = word; this.weight = weight; } @Override public String toString() { return String.form...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Tcl code in Java.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
public class SubsetSum { private static class Item { private String word; private int weight; public Item(String word, int weight) { this.word = word; this.weight = weight; } @Override public String toString() { return String.form...
Port the provided Tcl code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Tcl code.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
words = { "alliance": -624, "archbishop": -925, "balm": 397, "bonnet": 452, "brute": 870, "centipede": -658, "cobol": 362, "covariate": 590, "departure": 952, "deploy": 44, "diophantine": 645, "efferent": 54, "elysee": -326, "eradicate": 376, "escritoire": 856, "exorcism": -983, "fiat": 170, "filmy": -874,...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to Go.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Convert this Tcl block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
proc subsetsOfSize {set size} { if {$size <= 0} { return } elseif {$size == 1} { foreach elem $set {lappend result [list $elem]} } else { incr size [set i -1] foreach elem $set { foreach sub [subsetsOfSize [lreplace $set [incr i] $i] $size] { lappend result [lappend sub $elem] } } } ...
package main import "fmt" type ww struct { word string weight int } var input = []*ww{ {"alliance", -624}, {"archbishop", -915}, {"balm", 397}, {"bonnet", 452}, {"brute", 870}, {"centipede", -658}, {"cobol", 362}, {"covariate", 590}, {"departure", 952}, {"deploy", 44...
Port the following code from Ada to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Man_Or_Boy is function Zero return Integer is begin return 0; end Zero; function One return Integer is begin return 1; end One; function Neg return Integer is begin return -1; end Neg; function A ( K : Integer; X1, X2, X3, X4, X...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Ada.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Man_Or_Boy is function Zero return Integer is begin return 0; end Zero; function One return Integer is begin return 1; end One; function Neg return Integer is begin return -1; end Neg; function A ( K : Integer; X1, X2, X3, X4, X...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ada code in C++.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Man_Or_Boy is function Zero return Integer is begin return 0; end Zero; function One return Integer is begin return 1; end One; function Neg return Integer is begin return -1; end Neg; function A ( K : Integer; X1, X2, X3, X4, X...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to Go without modifying what it does.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Man_Or_Boy is function Zero return Integer is begin return 0; end Zero; function One return Integer is begin return 1; end One; function Neg return Integer is begin return -1; end Neg; function A ( K : Integer; X1, X2, X3, X4, X...
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ada to Java, same semantics.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Man_Or_Boy is function Zero return Integer is begin return 0; end Zero; function One return Integer is begin return 1; end One; function Neg return Integer is begin return -1; end Neg; function A ( K : Integer; X1, X2, X3, X4, X...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Ada implementation.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Man_Or_Boy is function Zero return Integer is begin return 0; end Zero; function One return Integer is begin return 1; end One; function Neg return Integer is begin return -1; end Neg; function A ( K : Integer; X1, X2, X3, X4, X...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Write the same code in C as shown below in BBC_Basic.
HIMEM = PAGE + 200000000 : FOR k% = 0 TO 20 PRINT FNA(k%, ^FN1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN1(), ^FN0()) NEXT END DEF FNA(k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%) IF k% <= 0 THEN = FN(x4%)(x4%) + FN(x5%)(x5%) LOCAL b{} DIM b{fn%, k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%} b...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in BBC_Basic.
HIMEM = PAGE + 200000000 : FOR k% = 0 TO 20 PRINT FNA(k%, ^FN1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN1(), ^FN0()) NEXT END DEF FNA(k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%) IF k% <= 0 THEN = FN(x4%)(x4%) + FN(x5%)(x5%) LOCAL b{} DIM b{fn%, k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%} b...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Translate the given BBC_Basic code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
HIMEM = PAGE + 200000000 : FOR k% = 0 TO 20 PRINT FNA(k%, ^FN1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN1(), ^FN0()) NEXT END DEF FNA(k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%) IF k% <= 0 THEN = FN(x4%)(x4%) + FN(x5%)(x5%) LOCAL b{} DIM b{fn%, k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%} b...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Translate the given BBC_Basic code snippet into Java without altering its behavior.
HIMEM = PAGE + 200000000 : FOR k% = 0 TO 20 PRINT FNA(k%, ^FN1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN1(), ^FN0()) NEXT END DEF FNA(k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%) IF k% <= 0 THEN = FN(x4%)(x4%) + FN(x5%)(x5%) LOCAL b{} DIM b{fn%, k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%} b...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original BBC_Basic code.
HIMEM = PAGE + 200000000 : FOR k% = 0 TO 20 PRINT FNA(k%, ^FN1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN1(), ^FN0()) NEXT END DEF FNA(k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%) IF k% <= 0 THEN = FN(x4%)(x4%) + FN(x5%)(x5%) LOCAL b{} DIM b{fn%, k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%} b...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Translate the given BBC_Basic code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
HIMEM = PAGE + 200000000 : FOR k% = 0 TO 20 PRINT FNA(k%, ^FN1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN_1(), ^FN1(), ^FN0()) NEXT END DEF FNA(k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%) IF k% <= 0 THEN = FN(x4%)(x4%) + FN(x5%)(x5%) LOCAL b{} DIM b{fn%, k%, x1%, x2%, x3%, x4%, x5%} b...
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Change the following Common_Lisp code into C without altering its purpose.
(declare a) (defn man-or-boy "Man or boy test for Clojure" [k] (let [k (atom k)] (a k (fn [] 1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] 1) (fn [] 0)))) (defn a [k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5] (let [k (atom @k)] (letfn [(b [] (swap! k dec) (a k b x1 x2 x3 x4))...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
(declare a) (defn man-or-boy "Man or boy test for Clojure" [k] (let [k (atom k)] (a k (fn [] 1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] 1) (fn [] 0)))) (defn a [k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5] (let [k (atom @k)] (letfn [(b [] (swap! k dec) (a k b x1 x2 x3 x4))...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Common_Lisp.
(declare a) (defn man-or-boy "Man or boy test for Clojure" [k] (let [k (atom k)] (a k (fn [] 1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] 1) (fn [] 0)))) (defn a [k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5] (let [k (atom @k)] (letfn [(b [] (swap! k dec) (a k b x1 x2 x3 x4))...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Common_Lisp snippet.
(declare a) (defn man-or-boy "Man or boy test for Clojure" [k] (let [k (atom k)] (a k (fn [] 1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] 1) (fn [] 0)))) (defn a [k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5] (let [k (atom @k)] (letfn [(b [] (swap! k dec) (a k b x1 x2 x3 x4))...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Common_Lisp to Python, same semantics.
(declare a) (defn man-or-boy "Man or boy test for Clojure" [k] (let [k (atom k)] (a k (fn [] 1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] 1) (fn [] 0)))) (defn a [k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5] (let [k (atom @k)] (letfn [(b [] (swap! k dec) (a k b x1 x2 x3 x4))...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Change the programming language of this snippet from Common_Lisp to Go without modifying what it does.
(declare a) (defn man-or-boy "Man or boy test for Clojure" [k] (let [k (atom k)] (a k (fn [] 1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] -1) (fn [] 1) (fn [] 0)))) (defn a [k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5] (let [k (atom @k)] (letfn [(b [] (swap! k dec) (a k b x1 x2 x3 x4))...
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in D.
import core.stdc.stdio: printf; int a(int k, const lazy int x1, const lazy int x2, const lazy int x3, const lazy int x4, const lazy int x5) pure { int b() { k--; return a(k, b(), x1, x2, x3, x4); } return k <= 0 ? x4 + x5 : b(); } void main() { printf("%d\n", a(10, 1, -1, -1, 1, ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in D.
import core.stdc.stdio: printf; int a(int k, const lazy int x1, const lazy int x2, const lazy int x3, const lazy int x4, const lazy int x5) pure { int b() { k--; return a(k, b(), x1, x2, x3, x4); } return k <= 0 ? x4 + x5 : b(); } void main() { printf("%d\n", a(10, 1, -1, -1, 1, ...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Write a version of this D function in C++ with identical behavior.
import core.stdc.stdio: printf; int a(int k, const lazy int x1, const lazy int x2, const lazy int x3, const lazy int x4, const lazy int x5) pure { int b() { k--; return a(k, b(), x1, x2, x3, x4); } return k <= 0 ? x4 + x5 : b(); } void main() { printf("%d\n", a(10, 1, -1, -1, 1, ...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Convert this D block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
import core.stdc.stdio: printf; int a(int k, const lazy int x1, const lazy int x2, const lazy int x3, const lazy int x4, const lazy int x5) pure { int b() { k--; return a(k, b(), x1, x2, x3, x4); } return k <= 0 ? x4 + x5 : b(); } void main() { printf("%d\n", a(10, 1, -1, -1, 1, ...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Port the provided D code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
import core.stdc.stdio: printf; int a(int k, const lazy int x1, const lazy int x2, const lazy int x3, const lazy int x4, const lazy int x5) pure { int b() { k--; return a(k, b(), x1, x2, x3, x4); } return k <= 0 ? x4 + x5 : b(); } void main() { printf("%d\n", a(10, 1, -1, -1, 1, ...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Write a version of this D function in Go with identical behavior.
import core.stdc.stdio: printf; int a(int k, const lazy int x1, const lazy int x2, const lazy int x3, const lazy int x4, const lazy int x5) pure { int b() { k--; return a(k, b(), x1, x2, x3, x4); } return k <= 0 ? x4 + x5 : b(); } void main() { printf("%d\n", a(10, 1, -1, -1, 1, ...
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Change the following Delphi code into C without altering its purpose.
type TFunc<T> = reference to function: T; function C(x: Integer): TFunc<Integer>; begin Result := function: Integer begin Result := x; end; end; function A(k: Integer; x1, x2, x3, x4, x5: TFunc<Integer>): Integer; var b: TFunc<Integer>; begin b := function: Integer begin Dec(k); Result := ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Delphi code in C#.
type TFunc<T> = reference to function: T; function C(x: Integer): TFunc<Integer>; begin Result := function: Integer begin Result := x; end; end; function A(k: Integer; x1, x2, x3, x4, x5: TFunc<Integer>): Integer; var b: TFunc<Integer>; begin b := function: Integer begin Dec(k); Result := ...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Convert the following code from Delphi to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
type TFunc<T> = reference to function: T; function C(x: Integer): TFunc<Integer>; begin Result := function: Integer begin Result := x; end; end; function A(k: Integer; x1, x2, x3, x4, x5: TFunc<Integer>): Integer; var b: TFunc<Integer>; begin b := function: Integer begin Dec(k); Result := ...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Write a version of this Delphi function in Java with identical behavior.
type TFunc<T> = reference to function: T; function C(x: Integer): TFunc<Integer>; begin Result := function: Integer begin Result := x; end; end; function A(k: Integer; x1, x2, x3, x4, x5: TFunc<Integer>): Integer; var b: TFunc<Integer>; begin b := function: Integer begin Dec(k); Result := ...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
type TFunc<T> = reference to function: T; function C(x: Integer): TFunc<Integer>; begin Result := function: Integer begin Result := x; end; end; function A(k: Integer; x1, x2, x3, x4, x5: TFunc<Integer>): Integer; var b: TFunc<Integer>; begin b := function: Integer begin Dec(k); Result := ...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Port the following code from Delphi to Go with equivalent syntax and logic.
type TFunc<T> = reference to function: T; function C(x: Integer): TFunc<Integer>; begin Result := function: Integer begin Result := x; end; end; function A(k: Integer; x1, x2, x3, x4, x5: TFunc<Integer>): Integer; var b: TFunc<Integer>; begin b := function: Integer begin Dec(k); Result := ...
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
[<EntryPoint>] let main (args : string[]) = let k = int(args.[0]) let l x = fun() -> x let rec a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = if k <= 0 then x4() + x5() else let k = ref k let rec b() = k := !k - 1 a !k b x1 x2 x3 x4 b()...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in F#.
[<EntryPoint>] let main (args : string[]) = let k = int(args.[0]) let l x = fun() -> x let rec a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = if k <= 0 then x4() + x5() else let k = ref k let rec b() = k := !k - 1 a !k b x1 x2 x3 x4 b()...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of F#, keeping it the same logically?
[<EntryPoint>] let main (args : string[]) = let k = int(args.[0]) let l x = fun() -> x let rec a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = if k <= 0 then x4() + x5() else let k = ref k let rec b() = k := !k - 1 a !k b x1 x2 x3 x4 b()...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Generate an equivalent Java version of this F# code.
[<EntryPoint>] let main (args : string[]) = let k = int(args.[0]) let l x = fun() -> x let rec a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = if k <= 0 then x4() + x5() else let k = ref k let rec b() = k := !k - 1 a !k b x1 x2 x3 x4 b()...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Please provide an equivalent version of this F# code in Python.
[<EntryPoint>] let main (args : string[]) = let k = int(args.[0]) let l x = fun() -> x let rec a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = if k <= 0 then x4() + x5() else let k = ref k let rec b() = k := !k - 1 a !k b x1 x2 x3 x4 b()...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in F#.
[<EntryPoint>] let main (args : string[]) = let k = int(args.[0]) let l x = fun() -> x let rec a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = if k <= 0 then x4() + x5() else let k = ref k let rec b() = k := !k - 1 a !k b x1 x2 x3 x4 b()...
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Forth.
: A {: w^ k x1 x2 x3 xt: x4 xt: x5 | w^ B :} recursive k @ 0<= IF x4 x5 f+ ELSE B k x1 x2 x3 action-of x4 [{: B k x1 x2 x3 x4 :}L -1 k +! k @ B @ x1 x2 x3 x4 A ;] dup B ! execute THEN ; 10 [: 1e ;] [: -1e ;] 2dup swap [: 0e ;] A f.
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Forth.
: A {: w^ k x1 x2 x3 xt: x4 xt: x5 | w^ B :} recursive k @ 0<= IF x4 x5 f+ ELSE B k x1 x2 x3 action-of x4 [{: B k x1 x2 x3 x4 :}L -1 k +! k @ B @ x1 x2 x3 x4 A ;] dup B ! execute THEN ; 10 [: 1e ;] [: -1e ;] 2dup swap [: 0e ;] A f.
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Forth snippet.
: A {: w^ k x1 x2 x3 xt: x4 xt: x5 | w^ B :} recursive k @ 0<= IF x4 x5 f+ ELSE B k x1 x2 x3 action-of x4 [{: B k x1 x2 x3 x4 :}L -1 k +! k @ B @ x1 x2 x3 x4 A ;] dup B ! execute THEN ; 10 [: 1e ;] [: -1e ;] 2dup swap [: 0e ;] A f.
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in Forth.
: A {: w^ k x1 x2 x3 xt: x4 xt: x5 | w^ B :} recursive k @ 0<= IF x4 x5 f+ ELSE B k x1 x2 x3 action-of x4 [{: B k x1 x2 x3 x4 :}L -1 k +! k @ B @ x1 x2 x3 x4 A ;] dup B ! execute THEN ; 10 [: 1e ;] [: -1e ;] 2dup swap [: 0e ;] A f.
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Convert this Forth snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
: A {: w^ k x1 x2 x3 xt: x4 xt: x5 | w^ B :} recursive k @ 0<= IF x4 x5 f+ ELSE B k x1 x2 x3 action-of x4 [{: B k x1 x2 x3 x4 :}L -1 k +! k @ B @ x1 x2 x3 x4 A ;] dup B ! execute THEN ; 10 [: 1e ;] [: -1e ;] 2dup swap [: 0e ;] A f.
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Forth to Go, same semantics.
: A {: w^ k x1 x2 x3 xt: x4 xt: x5 | w^ B :} recursive k @ 0<= IF x4 x5 f+ ELSE B k x1 x2 x3 action-of x4 [{: B k x1 x2 x3 x4 :}L -1 k +! k @ B @ x1 x2 x3 x4 A ;] dup B ! execute THEN ; 10 [: 1e ;] [: -1e ;] 2dup swap [: 0e ;] A f.
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Fortran to C#, same semantics.
module man_or_boy implicit none contains recursive integer function A(k,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) result(res) integer, intent(in) :: k interface recursive integer function x1() end function recursive integer function x2() end function recursive integer function x3() end function ...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Translate the given Fortran code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
module man_or_boy implicit none contains recursive integer function A(k,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) result(res) integer, intent(in) :: k interface recursive integer function x1() end function recursive integer function x2() end function recursive integer function x3() end function ...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this Fortran implementation.
module man_or_boy implicit none contains recursive integer function A(k,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) result(res) integer, intent(in) :: k interface recursive integer function x1() end function recursive integer function x2() end function recursive integer function x3() end function ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Fortran version.
module man_or_boy implicit none contains recursive integer function A(k,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) result(res) integer, intent(in) :: k interface recursive integer function x1() end function recursive integer function x2() end function recursive integer function x3() end function ...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Fortran, keeping it the same logically?
module man_or_boy implicit none contains recursive integer function A(k,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) result(res) integer, intent(in) :: k interface recursive integer function x1() end function recursive integer function x2() end function recursive integer function x3() end function ...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Change the programming language of this snippet from Fortran to PHP without modifying what it does.
module man_or_boy implicit none contains recursive integer function A(k,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) result(res) integer, intent(in) :: k interface recursive integer function x1() end function recursive integer function x2() end function recursive integer function x3() end function ...
<?php function A($k,$x1,$x2,$x3,$x4,$x5) { $b = function () use (&$b,&$k,$x1,$x2,$x3,$x4) { return A(--$k,$b,$x1,$x2,$x3,$x4); }; return $k <= 0 ? $x4() + $x5() : $b(); } echo A(10, function () { return 1; }, function () { return -1; }, function () { return -1; }, ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Groovy to C, same semantics.
def a; a = { k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 -> def b; b = { a (--k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } k <= 0 ? x4() + x5() : b() } def x = { n -> { it -> n } }
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Groovy.
def a; a = { k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 -> def b; b = { a (--k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } k <= 0 ? x4() + x5() : b() } def x = { n -> { it -> n } }
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Translate the given Groovy code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
def a; a = { k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 -> def b; b = { a (--k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } k <= 0 ? x4() + x5() : b() } def x = { n -> { it -> n } }
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Groovy implementation.
def a; a = { k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 -> def b; b = { a (--k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } k <= 0 ? x4() + x5() : b() } def x = { n -> { it -> n } }
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Groovy to Python without modifying what it does.
def a; a = { k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 -> def b; b = { a (--k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } k <= 0 ? x4() + x5() : b() } def x = { n -> { it -> n } }
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Transform the following Groovy implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
def a; a = { k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 -> def b; b = { a (--k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } k <= 0 ? x4() + x5() : b() } def x = { n -> { it -> n } }
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in Haskell.
import Data.IORef (modifyIORef, newIORef, readIORef) a :: (Enum a, Num b, Num a, Ord a) => a -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = do r <- newIORef k let b = do k <- pred ! r a k b x1 x2 x3 x4 if k <= 0 then (+) <$> x4 <*> x5 else b where f !r = mo...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct arg { int (*fn)(struct arg*); int *k; struct arg *x1, *x2, *x3, *x4, *x5; } ARG; int f_1 (ARG* _) { return -1; } int f0 (ARG* _) { return 0; } int f1 (ARG* _) { return 1; } int eval(ARG* a) { return a->fn(a); } #define MAKE_ARG(...) (&(...
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Haskell.
import Data.IORef (modifyIORef, newIORef, readIORef) a :: (Enum a, Num b, Num a, Ord a) => a -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = do r <- newIORef k let b = do k <- pred ! r a k b x1 x2 x3 x4 if k <= 0 then (+) <$> x4 <*> x5 else b where f !r = mo...
using System; delegate T Func<T>(); class ManOrBoy { static void Main() { Console.WriteLine(A(10, C(1), C(-1), C(-1), C(1), C(0))); } static Func<int> C(int i) { return delegate { return i; }; } static int A(int k, Func<int> x1, Func<int> x2, Func<int> x3, Func<int> x...
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Haskell.
import Data.IORef (modifyIORef, newIORef, readIORef) a :: (Enum a, Num b, Num a, Ord a) => a -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = do r <- newIORef k let b = do k <- pred ! r a k b x1 x2 x3 x4 if k <= 0 then (+) <$> x4 <*> x5 else b where f !r = mo...
#include <iostream> #include <tr1/memory> using std::tr1::shared_ptr; using std::tr1::enable_shared_from_this; struct Arg { virtual int run() = 0; virtual ~Arg() { }; }; int A(int, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>, shared_ptr<Arg>); class B : public Arg, public enable_shar...
Convert this Haskell snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
import Data.IORef (modifyIORef, newIORef, readIORef) a :: (Enum a, Num b, Num a, Ord a) => a -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = do r <- newIORef k let b = do k <- pred ! r a k b x1 x2 x3 x4 if k <= 0 then (+) <$> x4 <*> x5 else b where f !r = mo...
import java.util.function.DoubleSupplier; public class ManOrBoy { static double A(int k, DoubleSupplier x1, DoubleSupplier x2, DoubleSupplier x3, DoubleSupplier x4, DoubleSupplier x5) { DoubleSupplier B = new DoubleSupplier() { int m = k; public double...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Haskell to Python, same semantics.
import Data.IORef (modifyIORef, newIORef, readIORef) a :: (Enum a, Num b, Num a, Ord a) => a -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = do r <- newIORef k let b = do k <- pred ! r a k b x1 x2 x3 x4 if k <= 0 then (+) <$> x4 <*> x5 else b where f !r = mo...
import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(1025) def a(in_k, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5): k = [in_k] def b(): k[0] -= 1 return a(k[0], b, x1, x2, x3, x4) return x4() + x5() if k[0] <= 0 else b() x = lambda i: lambda: i print(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(-1), x(1), x(0)))
Port the provided Haskell code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
import Data.IORef (modifyIORef, newIORef, readIORef) a :: (Enum a, Num b, Num a, Ord a) => a -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b -> IO b a k x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 = do r <- newIORef k let b = do k <- pred ! r a k b x1 x2 x3 x4 if k <= 0 then (+) <$> x4 <*> x5 else b where f !r = mo...
package main import "fmt" func a(k int, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 func() int) int { var b func() int b = func() int { k-- return a(k, b, x1, x2, x3, x4) } if k <= 0 { return x4() + x5() } return b() } func main() { x := func(i int) func() int { return func() int { return i } } fmt.Println(a(10, x(1), x(-1), x(...