Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { intArrayOf(4, 5, 6).forEach lambda@ { if (it == 5) return@lambda println(it) } println() loop@ for (i in 0 .. 3) { for (j in 0 .. 3) { if (i + j == 4) continue@loop if (i + j == 5) break@loop println(i + j) ...
Public Sub jump() Debug.Print "VBA only allows" GoTo 1 Debug.Print "no global jumps" 1: Debug.Print "jumps in procedures with GoTo" Debug.Print "However," On 2 GoSub one, two Debug.Print "named in the list after Debug.Print "and execution will continue on the next line" On 1 GoTo on...
Convert the following code from Scala to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { intArrayOf(4, 5, 6).forEach lambda@ { if (it == 5) return@lambda println(it) } println() loop@ for (i in 0 .. 3) { for (j in 0 .. 3) { if (i + j == 4) continue@loop if (i + j == 5) break@loop println(i + j) ...
package main import "fmt" func main() { outer: for i := 0; i < 4; i++ { for j := 0; j < 4; j++ { if i + j == 4 { continue outer } if i + j == 5 { break outer } fmt.Println(i + j) } } k := 3 if k == 3 { goto later } fmt.Println(k) later...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
fun main(args: Array<String>) { intArrayOf(4, 5, 6).forEach lambda@ { if (it == 5) return@lambda println(it) } println() loop@ for (i in 0 .. 3) { for (j in 0 .. 3) { if (i + j == 4) continue@loop if (i + j == 5) break@loop println(i + j) ...
package main import "fmt" func main() { outer: for i := 0; i < 4; i++ { for j := 0; j < 4; j++ { if i + j == 4 { continue outer } if i + j == 5 { break outer } fmt.Println(i + j) } } k := 3 if k == 3 { goto later } fmt.Println(k) later...
Translate the given Ada code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Combinations is generic type Integers is range <>; package Combinations is type Combination is array (Positive range <>) of Integers; procedure First (X : in out Combination); procedure Next (X : in out Combination); procedure Put ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Ada.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Combinations is generic type Integers is range <>; package Combinations is type Combination is array (Positive range <>) of Integers; procedure First (X : in out Combination); procedure Next (X : in out Combination); procedure Put ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Change the following Ada code into C++ without altering its purpose.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Combinations is generic type Integers is range <>; package Combinations is type Combination is array (Positive range <>) of Integers; procedure First (X : in out Combination); procedure Next (X : in out Combination); procedure Put ...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Convert the following code from Ada to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Combinations is generic type Integers is range <>; package Combinations is type Combination is array (Positive range <>) of Integers; procedure First (X : in out Combination); procedure Next (X : in out Combination); procedure Put ...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Ada snippet.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Combinations is generic type Integers is range <>; package Combinations is type Combination is array (Positive range <>) of Integers; procedure First (X : in out Combination); procedure Next (X : in out Combination); procedure Put ...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Ada.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Combinations is generic type Integers is range <>; package Combinations is type Combination is array (Positive range <>) of Integers; procedure First (X : in out Combination); procedure Next (X : in out Combination); procedure Put ...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Ensure the translated VB code behaves exactly like the original Ada snippet.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Combinations is generic type Integers is range <>; package Combinations is type Combination is array (Positive range <>) of Integers; procedure First (X : in out Combination); procedure Next (X : in out Combination); procedure Put ...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this AutoHotKey implementation.
MsgBox % Comb(1,1) MsgBox % Comb(3,3) MsgBox % Comb(3,2) MsgBox % Comb(2,3) MsgBox % Comb(5,3) Comb(n,t) {  IfLess n,%t%, Return Loop %t% c%A_Index% := A_Index i := t+1, c%i% := n+1 Loop { Loop %t% i := t+1-A_Index, c .= c%i% " " c .= "`n"   j := 1, i := 2 Loop ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from AutoHotKey to C# without modifying what it does.
MsgBox % Comb(1,1) MsgBox % Comb(3,3) MsgBox % Comb(3,2) MsgBox % Comb(2,3) MsgBox % Comb(5,3) Comb(n,t) {  IfLess n,%t%, Return Loop %t% c%A_Index% := A_Index i := t+1, c%i% := n+1 Loop { Loop %t% i := t+1-A_Index, c .= c%i% " " c .= "`n"   j := 1, i := 2 Loop ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from AutoHotKey to C++, same semantics.
MsgBox % Comb(1,1) MsgBox % Comb(3,3) MsgBox % Comb(3,2) MsgBox % Comb(2,3) MsgBox % Comb(5,3) Comb(n,t) {  IfLess n,%t%, Return Loop %t% c%A_Index% := A_Index i := t+1, c%i% := n+1 Loop { Loop %t% i := t+1-A_Index, c .= c%i% " " c .= "`n"   j := 1, i := 2 Loop ...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
MsgBox % Comb(1,1) MsgBox % Comb(3,3) MsgBox % Comb(3,2) MsgBox % Comb(2,3) MsgBox % Comb(5,3) Comb(n,t) {  IfLess n,%t%, Return Loop %t% c%A_Index% := A_Index i := t+1, c%i% := n+1 Loop { Loop %t% i := t+1-A_Index, c .= c%i% " " c .= "`n"   j := 1, i := 2 Loop ...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from AutoHotKey to Python, same semantics.
MsgBox % Comb(1,1) MsgBox % Comb(3,3) MsgBox % Comb(3,2) MsgBox % Comb(2,3) MsgBox % Comb(5,3) Comb(n,t) {  IfLess n,%t%, Return Loop %t% c%A_Index% := A_Index i := t+1, c%i% := n+1 Loop { Loop %t% i := t+1-A_Index, c .= c%i% " " c .= "`n"   j := 1, i := 2 Loop ...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Translate the given AutoHotKey code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
MsgBox % Comb(1,1) MsgBox % Comb(3,3) MsgBox % Comb(3,2) MsgBox % Comb(2,3) MsgBox % Comb(5,3) Comb(n,t) {  IfLess n,%t%, Return Loop %t% c%A_Index% := A_Index i := t+1, c%i% := n+1 Loop { Loop %t% i := t+1-A_Index, c .= c%i% " " c .= "`n"   j := 1, i := 2 Loop ...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
MsgBox % Comb(1,1) MsgBox % Comb(3,3) MsgBox % Comb(3,2) MsgBox % Comb(2,3) MsgBox % Comb(5,3) Comb(n,t) {  IfLess n,%t%, Return Loop %t% c%A_Index% := A_Index i := t+1, c%i% := n+1 Loop { Loop %t% i := t+1-A_Index, c .= c%i% " " c .= "`n"   j := 1, i := 2 Loop ...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original AWK code.
BEGIN { if (length(r) == 0) r = 3 if (length(n) == 0) n = 5 for (i=1; i <= r; i++) { A[i] = i if (i < r ) printf i OFS else print i} while (A[1] < n - r + 1) { for (i = r; i >= 1; i--) { if (A[i] < n - r + i) { A[i]++ p = i break}} for (i...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Change the following AWK code into C# without altering its purpose.
BEGIN { if (length(r) == 0) r = 3 if (length(n) == 0) n = 5 for (i=1; i <= r; i++) { A[i] = i if (i < r ) printf i OFS else print i} while (A[1] < n - r + 1) { for (i = r; i >= 1; i--) { if (A[i] < n - r + i) { A[i]++ p = i break}} for (i...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from AWK to C++, same semantics.
BEGIN { if (length(r) == 0) r = 3 if (length(n) == 0) n = 5 for (i=1; i <= r; i++) { A[i] = i if (i < r ) printf i OFS else print i} while (A[1] < n - r + 1) { for (i = r; i >= 1; i--) { if (A[i] < n - r + i) { A[i]++ p = i break}} for (i...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Change the programming language of this snippet from AWK to Java without modifying what it does.
BEGIN { if (length(r) == 0) r = 3 if (length(n) == 0) n = 5 for (i=1; i <= r; i++) { A[i] = i if (i < r ) printf i OFS else print i} while (A[1] < n - r + 1) { for (i = r; i >= 1; i--) { if (A[i] < n - r + i) { A[i]++ p = i break}} for (i...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Change the following AWK code into Python without altering its purpose.
BEGIN { if (length(r) == 0) r = 3 if (length(n) == 0) n = 5 for (i=1; i <= r; i++) { A[i] = i if (i < r ) printf i OFS else print i} while (A[1] < n - r + 1) { for (i = r; i >= 1; i--) { if (A[i] < n - r + i) { A[i]++ p = i break}} for (i...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Change the programming language of this snippet from AWK to VB without modifying what it does.
BEGIN { if (length(r) == 0) r = 3 if (length(n) == 0) n = 5 for (i=1; i <= r; i++) { A[i] = i if (i < r ) printf i OFS else print i} while (A[1] < n - r + 1) { for (i = r; i >= 1; i--) { if (A[i] < n - r + i) { A[i]++ p = i break}} for (i...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Write the same code in Go as shown below in AWK.
BEGIN { if (length(r) == 0) r = 3 if (length(n) == 0) n = 5 for (i=1; i <= r; i++) { A[i] = i if (i < r ) printf i OFS else print i} while (A[1] < n - r + 1) { for (i = r; i >= 1; i--) { if (A[i] < n - r + i) { A[i]++ p = i break}} for (i...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in BBC_Basic.
INSTALL @lib$+"SORTLIB" sort% = FN_sortinit(0,0) M% = 3 N% = 5 C% = FNfact(N%)/(FNfact(M%)*FNfact(N%-M%)) DIM s$(C%) PROCcomb(M%, N%, s$()) CALL sort%, s$(0) FOR I% = 0 TO C%-1 PRINT s$(I%) NEXT END DEF PROCcomb(...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original BBC_Basic code.
INSTALL @lib$+"SORTLIB" sort% = FN_sortinit(0,0) M% = 3 N% = 5 C% = FNfact(N%)/(FNfact(M%)*FNfact(N%-M%)) DIM s$(C%) PROCcomb(M%, N%, s$()) CALL sort%, s$(0) FOR I% = 0 TO C%-1 PRINT s$(I%) NEXT END DEF PROCcomb(...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original BBC_Basic snippet.
INSTALL @lib$+"SORTLIB" sort% = FN_sortinit(0,0) M% = 3 N% = 5 C% = FNfact(N%)/(FNfact(M%)*FNfact(N%-M%)) DIM s$(C%) PROCcomb(M%, N%, s$()) CALL sort%, s$(0) FOR I% = 0 TO C%-1 PRINT s$(I%) NEXT END DEF PROCcomb(...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Convert this BBC_Basic snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
INSTALL @lib$+"SORTLIB" sort% = FN_sortinit(0,0) M% = 3 N% = 5 C% = FNfact(N%)/(FNfact(M%)*FNfact(N%-M%)) DIM s$(C%) PROCcomb(M%, N%, s$()) CALL sort%, s$(0) FOR I% = 0 TO C%-1 PRINT s$(I%) NEXT END DEF PROCcomb(...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this BBC_Basic code in Python.
INSTALL @lib$+"SORTLIB" sort% = FN_sortinit(0,0) M% = 3 N% = 5 C% = FNfact(N%)/(FNfact(M%)*FNfact(N%-M%)) DIM s$(C%) PROCcomb(M%, N%, s$()) CALL sort%, s$(0) FOR I% = 0 TO C%-1 PRINT s$(I%) NEXT END DEF PROCcomb(...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in BBC_Basic.
INSTALL @lib$+"SORTLIB" sort% = FN_sortinit(0,0) M% = 3 N% = 5 C% = FNfact(N%)/(FNfact(M%)*FNfact(N%-M%)) DIM s$(C%) PROCcomb(M%, N%, s$()) CALL sort%, s$(0) FOR I% = 0 TO C%-1 PRINT s$(I%) NEXT END DEF PROCcomb(...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Translate the given BBC_Basic code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
INSTALL @lib$+"SORTLIB" sort% = FN_sortinit(0,0) M% = 3 N% = 5 C% = FNfact(N%)/(FNfact(M%)*FNfact(N%-M%)) DIM s$(C%) PROCcomb(M%, N%, s$()) CALL sort%, s$(0) FOR I% = 0 TO C%-1 PRINT s$(I%) NEXT END DEF PROCcomb(...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Clojure.
(defn combinations "If m=1, generate a nested list of numbers [0,n) If m>1, for each x in [0,n), and for each list in the recursion on [x+1,n), cons the two" [m n] (letfn [(comb-aux [m start] (if (= 1 m) (for [x (range start n)] (list x)) (for [x (range start n) xs (comb-aux (d...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
(defn combinations "If m=1, generate a nested list of numbers [0,n) If m>1, for each x in [0,n), and for each list in the recursion on [x+1,n), cons the two" [m n] (letfn [(comb-aux [m start] (if (= 1 m) (for [x (range start n)] (list x)) (for [x (range start n) xs (comb-aux (d...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Write a version of this Clojure function in C++ with identical behavior.
(defn combinations "If m=1, generate a nested list of numbers [0,n) If m>1, for each x in [0,n), and for each list in the recursion on [x+1,n), cons the two" [m n] (letfn [(comb-aux [m start] (if (= 1 m) (for [x (range start n)] (list x)) (for [x (range start n) xs (comb-aux (d...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Port the provided Clojure code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
(defn combinations "If m=1, generate a nested list of numbers [0,n) If m>1, for each x in [0,n), and for each list in the recursion on [x+1,n), cons the two" [m n] (letfn [(comb-aux [m start] (if (= 1 m) (for [x (range start n)] (list x)) (for [x (range start n) xs (comb-aux (d...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Convert this Clojure block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
(defn combinations "If m=1, generate a nested list of numbers [0,n) If m>1, for each x in [0,n), and for each list in the recursion on [x+1,n), cons the two" [m n] (letfn [(comb-aux [m start] (if (= 1 m) (for [x (range start n)] (list x)) (for [x (range start n) xs (comb-aux (d...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Generate an equivalent VB version of this Clojure code.
(defn combinations "If m=1, generate a nested list of numbers [0,n) If m>1, for each x in [0,n), and for each list in the recursion on [x+1,n), cons the two" [m n] (letfn [(comb-aux [m start] (if (= 1 m) (for [x (range start n)] (list x)) (for [x (range start n) xs (comb-aux (d...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Generate a Go translation of this Clojure snippet without changing its computational steps.
(defn combinations "If m=1, generate a nested list of numbers [0,n) If m>1, for each x in [0,n), and for each list in the recursion on [x+1,n), cons the two" [m n] (letfn [(comb-aux [m start] (if (= 1 m) (for [x (range start n)] (list x)) (for [x (range start n) xs (comb-aux (d...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Common_Lisp version.
(defun map-combinations (m n fn) "Call fn with each m combination of the integers from 0 to n-1 as a list. The list may be destroyed after fn returns." (let ((combination (make-list m))) (labels ((up-from (low) (let ((start (1- low))) (lambda () (incf start)))) (mc (...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Translate the given Common_Lisp code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
(defun map-combinations (m n fn) "Call fn with each m combination of the integers from 0 to n-1 as a list. The list may be destroyed after fn returns." (let ((combination (make-list m))) (labels ((up-from (low) (let ((start (1- low))) (lambda () (incf start)))) (mc (...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Common_Lisp implementation.
(defun map-combinations (m n fn) "Call fn with each m combination of the integers from 0 to n-1 as a list. The list may be destroyed after fn returns." (let ((combination (make-list m))) (labels ((up-from (low) (let ((start (1- low))) (lambda () (incf start)))) (mc (...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Port the provided Common_Lisp code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
(defun map-combinations (m n fn) "Call fn with each m combination of the integers from 0 to n-1 as a list. The list may be destroyed after fn returns." (let ((combination (make-list m))) (labels ((up-from (low) (let ((start (1- low))) (lambda () (incf start)))) (mc (...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Common_Lisp.
(defun map-combinations (m n fn) "Call fn with each m combination of the integers from 0 to n-1 as a list. The list may be destroyed after fn returns." (let ((combination (make-list m))) (labels ((up-from (low) (let ((start (1- low))) (lambda () (incf start)))) (mc (...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Common_Lisp, keeping it the same logically?
(defun map-combinations (m n fn) "Call fn with each m combination of the integers from 0 to n-1 as a list. The list may be destroyed after fn returns." (let ((combination (make-list m))) (labels ((up-from (low) (let ((start (1- low))) (lambda () (incf start)))) (mc (...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original Common_Lisp snippet.
(defun map-combinations (m n fn) "Call fn with each m combination of the integers from 0 to n-1 as a list. The list may be destroyed after fn returns." (let ((combination (make-list m))) (labels ((up-from (low) (let ((start (1- low))) (lambda () (incf start)))) (mc (...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Generate a C translation of this D snippet without changing its computational steps.
T[][] comb(T)(in T[] arr, in int k) pure nothrow { if (k == 0) return [[]]; typeof(return) result; foreach (immutable i, immutable x; arr) foreach (suffix; arr[i + 1 .. $].comb(k - 1)) result ~= x ~ suffix; return result; } void main() { import std.stdio; [0, 1, 2, 3].comb(2...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Convert the following code from D to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
T[][] comb(T)(in T[] arr, in int k) pure nothrow { if (k == 0) return [[]]; typeof(return) result; foreach (immutable i, immutable x; arr) foreach (suffix; arr[i + 1 .. $].comb(k - 1)) result ~= x ~ suffix; return result; } void main() { import std.stdio; [0, 1, 2, 3].comb(2...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this D code in C++.
T[][] comb(T)(in T[] arr, in int k) pure nothrow { if (k == 0) return [[]]; typeof(return) result; foreach (immutable i, immutable x; arr) foreach (suffix; arr[i + 1 .. $].comb(k - 1)) result ~= x ~ suffix; return result; } void main() { import std.stdio; [0, 1, 2, 3].comb(2...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original D code.
T[][] comb(T)(in T[] arr, in int k) pure nothrow { if (k == 0) return [[]]; typeof(return) result; foreach (immutable i, immutable x; arr) foreach (suffix; arr[i + 1 .. $].comb(k - 1)) result ~= x ~ suffix; return result; } void main() { import std.stdio; [0, 1, 2, 3].comb(2...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Transform the following D implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
T[][] comb(T)(in T[] arr, in int k) pure nothrow { if (k == 0) return [[]]; typeof(return) result; foreach (immutable i, immutable x; arr) foreach (suffix; arr[i + 1 .. $].comb(k - 1)) result ~= x ~ suffix; return result; } void main() { import std.stdio; [0, 1, 2, 3].comb(2...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Please provide an equivalent version of this D code in VB.
T[][] comb(T)(in T[] arr, in int k) pure nothrow { if (k == 0) return [[]]; typeof(return) result; foreach (immutable i, immutable x; arr) foreach (suffix; arr[i + 1 .. $].comb(k - 1)) result ~= x ~ suffix; return result; } void main() { import std.stdio; [0, 1, 2, 3].comb(2...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
T[][] comb(T)(in T[] arr, in int k) pure nothrow { if (k == 0) return [[]]; typeof(return) result; foreach (immutable i, immutable x; arr) foreach (suffix; arr[i + 1 .. $].comb(k - 1)) result ~= x ~ suffix; return result; } void main() { import std.stdio; [0, 1, 2, 3].comb(2...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Elixir version.
defmodule RC do def comb(0, _), do: [[]] def comb(_, []), do: [] def comb(m, [h|t]) do (for l <- comb(m-1, t), do: [h|l]) ++ comb(m, t) end end {m, n} = {3, 5} list = for i <- 1..n, do: i Enum.each(RC.comb(m, list), fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
defmodule RC do def comb(0, _), do: [[]] def comb(_, []), do: [] def comb(m, [h|t]) do (for l <- comb(m-1, t), do: [h|l]) ++ comb(m, t) end end {m, n} = {3, 5} list = for i <- 1..n, do: i Enum.each(RC.comb(m, list), fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Elixir implementation.
defmodule RC do def comb(0, _), do: [[]] def comb(_, []), do: [] def comb(m, [h|t]) do (for l <- comb(m-1, t), do: [h|l]) ++ comb(m, t) end end {m, n} = {3, 5} list = for i <- 1..n, do: i Enum.each(RC.comb(m, list), fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Translate the given Elixir code snippet into Java without altering its behavior.
defmodule RC do def comb(0, _), do: [[]] def comb(_, []), do: [] def comb(m, [h|t]) do (for l <- comb(m-1, t), do: [h|l]) ++ comb(m, t) end end {m, n} = {3, 5} list = for i <- 1..n, do: i Enum.each(RC.comb(m, list), fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Elixir implementation.
defmodule RC do def comb(0, _), do: [[]] def comb(_, []), do: [] def comb(m, [h|t]) do (for l <- comb(m-1, t), do: [h|l]) ++ comb(m, t) end end {m, n} = {3, 5} list = for i <- 1..n, do: i Enum.each(RC.comb(m, list), fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Elixir version.
defmodule RC do def comb(0, _), do: [[]] def comb(_, []), do: [] def comb(m, [h|t]) do (for l <- comb(m-1, t), do: [h|l]) ++ comb(m, t) end end {m, n} = {3, 5} list = for i <- 1..n, do: i Enum.each(RC.comb(m, list), fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Convert this Elixir block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
defmodule RC do def comb(0, _), do: [[]] def comb(_, []), do: [] def comb(m, [h|t]) do (for l <- comb(m-1, t), do: [h|l]) ++ comb(m, t) end end {m, n} = {3, 5} list = for i <- 1..n, do: i Enum.each(RC.comb(m, list), fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Change the following Erlang code into C without altering its purpose.
-module(comb). -compile(export_all). comb(0,_) -> [[]]; comb(_,[]) -> []; comb(N,[H|T]) -> [[H|L] || L <- comb(N-1,T)]++comb(N,T).
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Port the following code from Erlang to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
-module(comb). -compile(export_all). comb(0,_) -> [[]]; comb(_,[]) -> []; comb(N,[H|T]) -> [[H|L] || L <- comb(N-1,T)]++comb(N,T).
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Convert this Erlang block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
-module(comb). -compile(export_all). comb(0,_) -> [[]]; comb(_,[]) -> []; comb(N,[H|T]) -> [[H|L] || L <- comb(N-1,T)]++comb(N,T).
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
-module(comb). -compile(export_all). comb(0,_) -> [[]]; comb(_,[]) -> []; comb(N,[H|T]) -> [[H|L] || L <- comb(N-1,T)]++comb(N,T).
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in Erlang.
-module(comb). -compile(export_all). comb(0,_) -> [[]]; comb(_,[]) -> []; comb(N,[H|T]) -> [[H|L] || L <- comb(N-1,T)]++comb(N,T).
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Produce a functionally identical VB code for the snippet given in Erlang.
-module(comb). -compile(export_all). comb(0,_) -> [[]]; comb(_,[]) -> []; comb(N,[H|T]) -> [[H|L] || L <- comb(N-1,T)]++comb(N,T).
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
-module(comb). -compile(export_all). comb(0,_) -> [[]]; comb(_,[]) -> []; comb(N,[H|T]) -> [[H|L] || L <- comb(N-1,T)]++comb(N,T).
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of F#, keeping it the same logically?
let choose m n = let rec fC prefix m from = seq { let rec loopFor f = seq { match f with | [] -> () | x::xs -> yield (x, fC [] (m-1) xs) yield! loopFor xs } if m = 0 then yield prefix else for (i, s) in l...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this F# code in C#.
let choose m n = let rec fC prefix m from = seq { let rec loopFor f = seq { match f with | [] -> () | x::xs -> yield (x, fC [] (m-1) xs) yield! loopFor xs } if m = 0 then yield prefix else for (i, s) in l...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Change the following F# code into C++ without altering its purpose.
let choose m n = let rec fC prefix m from = seq { let rec loopFor f = seq { match f with | [] -> () | x::xs -> yield (x, fC [] (m-1) xs) yield! loopFor xs } if m = 0 then yield prefix else for (i, s) in l...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Transform the following F# implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
let choose m n = let rec fC prefix m from = seq { let rec loopFor f = seq { match f with | [] -> () | x::xs -> yield (x, fC [] (m-1) xs) yield! loopFor xs } if m = 0 then yield prefix else for (i, s) in l...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Convert the following code from F# to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
let choose m n = let rec fC prefix m from = seq { let rec loopFor f = seq { match f with | [] -> () | x::xs -> yield (x, fC [] (m-1) xs) yield! loopFor xs } if m = 0 then yield prefix else for (i, s) in l...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
let choose m n = let rec fC prefix m from = seq { let rec loopFor f = seq { match f with | [] -> () | x::xs -> yield (x, fC [] (m-1) xs) yield! loopFor xs } if m = 0 then yield prefix else for (i, s) in l...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in F#.
let choose m n = let rec fC prefix m from = seq { let rec loopFor f = seq { match f with | [] -> () | x::xs -> yield (x, fC [] (m-1) xs) yield! loopFor xs } if m = 0 then yield prefix else for (i, s) in l...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in Factor.
USING: math.combinatorics prettyprint ; 5 iota 3 all-combinations .
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Factor implementation.
USING: math.combinatorics prettyprint ; 5 iota 3 all-combinations .
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Write a version of this Factor function in C++ with identical behavior.
USING: math.combinatorics prettyprint ; 5 iota 3 all-combinations .
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Port the following code from Factor to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
USING: math.combinatorics prettyprint ; 5 iota 3 all-combinations .
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
USING: math.combinatorics prettyprint ; 5 iota 3 all-combinations .
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Transform the following Factor implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
USING: math.combinatorics prettyprint ; 5 iota 3 all-combinations .
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Transform the following Factor implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
USING: math.combinatorics prettyprint ; 5 iota 3 all-combinations .
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Translate the given Fortran code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Fortran version.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Fortran code.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Translate the given Fortran code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Fortran code.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Produce a functionally identical VB code for the snippet given in Fortran.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Rewrite this program in PHP while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Fortran version.
program Combinations use iso_fortran_env implicit none type comb_result integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: combs end type comb_result type(comb_result), dimension(:), pointer :: r integer :: i, j call comb(5, 3, r) do i = 0, choose(5, 3) - 1 do j = 2, 0, -1 write(*, "(I4, ' ')", ...
<?php $a=array(1,2,3,4,5); $k=3; $n=5; $c=array_splice($a, $k); $b=array_splice($a, 0, $k); $j=$k-1; print_r($b); while (1) { $m=array_search($b[$j]+1,$c); if ($m!==false) { $c[$m]-=1; $b[$j]=$b[$j]+1; print_r($b); } if ($b[$...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Groovy version.
def comb comb = { m, list -> def n = list.size() m == 0 ? [[]] : (0..(n-m)).inject([]) { newlist, k -> def sublist = (k+1 == n) ? [] : list[(k+1)..<n] newlist += comb(m-1, sublist).collect { [list[k]] + it } } }
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Port the provided Groovy code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
def comb comb = { m, list -> def n = list.size() m == 0 ? [[]] : (0..(n-m)).inject([]) { newlist, k -> def sublist = (k+1 == n) ? [] : list[(k+1)..<n] newlist += comb(m-1, sublist).collect { [list[k]] + it } } }
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Convert this Groovy block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
def comb comb = { m, list -> def n = list.size() m == 0 ? [[]] : (0..(n-m)).inject([]) { newlist, k -> def sublist = (k+1 == n) ? [] : list[(k+1)..<n] newlist += comb(m-1, sublist).collect { [list[k]] + it } } }
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Groovy snippet.
def comb comb = { m, list -> def n = list.size() m == 0 ? [[]] : (0..(n-m)).inject([]) { newlist, k -> def sublist = (k+1 == n) ? [] : list[(k+1)..<n] newlist += comb(m-1, sublist).collect { [list[k]] + it } } }
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Translate the given Groovy code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
def comb comb = { m, list -> def n = list.size() m == 0 ? [[]] : (0..(n-m)).inject([]) { newlist, k -> def sublist = (k+1 == n) ? [] : list[(k+1)..<n] newlist += comb(m-1, sublist).collect { [list[k]] + it } } }
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
Change the programming language of this snippet from Groovy to VB without modifying what it does.
def comb comb = { m, list -> def n = list.size() m == 0 ? [[]] : (0..(n-m)).inject([]) { newlist, k -> def sublist = (k+1 == n) ? [] : list[(k+1)..<n] newlist += comb(m-1, sublist).collect { [list[k]] + it } } }
input "Enter n comb m. ", n input m outstr$ = "" call iterate (outstr$, 0, m-1, n-1) end subroutine iterate (curr$, start, stp, depth) for i = start to stp if depth = 0 then print curr$ + " " + string(i) call iterate (curr$ + " " + string(i), i+1, stp, depth-1) next i end subroutine
Generate a Go translation of this Groovy snippet without changing its computational steps.
def comb comb = { m, list -> def n = list.size() m == 0 ? [[]] : (0..(n-m)).inject([]) { newlist, k -> def sublist = (k+1 == n) ? [] : list[(k+1)..<n] newlist += comb(m-1, sublist).collect { [list[k]] + it } } }
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { comb(5, 3, func(c []int) { fmt.Println(c) }) } func comb(n, m int, emit func([]int)) { s := make([]int, m) last := m - 1 var rc func(int, int) rc = func(i, next int) { for j := next; j < n; j++ { s[i] = j ...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Haskell version.
comb :: Int -> [a] -> [[a]] comb 0 _ = [[]] comb _ [] = [] comb m (x:xs) = map (x:) (comb (m-1) xs) ++ comb m xs
#include <stdio.h> typedef unsigned long marker; marker one = 1; void comb(int pool, int need, marker chosen, int at) { if (pool < need + at) return; if (!need) { for (at = 0; at < pool; at++) if (chosen & (one << at)) printf("%d ", at); printf("\n"); return; } comb(pool, need - 1, chosen | (one ...
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original Haskell code.
comb :: Int -> [a] -> [[a]] comb 0 _ = [[]] comb _ [] = [] comb m (x:xs) = map (x:) (comb (m-1) xs) ++ comb m xs
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class Program { public static IEnumerable<int[]> Combinations(int m, int n) { int[] result = new int[m]; Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); stack.Push(0); while (stack.Count > 0) { ...
Port the following code from Haskell to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
comb :: Int -> [a] -> [[a]] comb 0 _ = [[]] comb _ [] = [] comb m (x:xs) = map (x:) (comb (m-1) xs) ++ comb m xs
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <string> void comb(int N, int K) { std::string bitmask(K, 1); bitmask.resize(N, 0); do { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) { if (bitmask[i]) std::cout << " " << i; } std::cout << std::endl; } while (std::pr...
Generate a Java translation of this Haskell snippet without changing its computational steps.
comb :: Int -> [a] -> [[a]] comb 0 _ = [[]] comb _ [] = [] comb m (x:xs) = map (x:) (comb (m-1) xs) ++ comb m xs
import java.util.Collections; import java.util.LinkedList; public class Comb{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(comb(3,5)); } public static String bitprint(int u){ String s= ""; for(int n= 0;u > 0;++n, u>>= 1) ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
comb :: Int -> [a] -> [[a]] comb 0 _ = [[]] comb _ [] = [] comb m (x:xs) = map (x:) (comb (m-1) xs) ++ comb m xs
>>> from itertools import combinations >>> list(combinations(range(5),3)) [(0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 3), (0, 2, 4), (0, 3, 4), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]