Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Port the provided Racket code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
#lang racket (require racket/generator) (define (memoize f) (define table (make-hash)) (λ args (hash-ref! table args (thunk (apply f args))))) (define fusc (memoize (λ (n) (cond [(<= n 1) n] [(even? n) (fusc (/ n 2))] [else (+ (fusc (/ (sub1 n) 2)) (fusc (/ (add1 n) 2)))])))) (de...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
#lang racket (require racket/generator) (define (memoize f) (define table (make-hash)) (λ args (hash-ref! table args (thunk (apply f args))))) (define fusc (memoize (λ (n) (cond [(<= n 1) n] [(even? n) (fusc (/ n 2))] [else (+ (fusc (/ (sub1 n) 2)) (fusc (/ (add1 n) 2)))])))) (de...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Change the following Racket code into VB without altering its purpose.
#lang racket (require racket/generator) (define (memoize f) (define table (make-hash)) (λ args (hash-ref! table args (thunk (apply f args))))) (define fusc (memoize (λ (n) (cond [(<= n 1) n] [(even? n) (fusc (/ n 2))] [else (+ (fusc (/ (sub1 n) 2)) (fusc (/ (add1 n) 2)))])))) (de...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Racket code.
#lang racket (require racket/generator) (define (memoize f) (define table (make-hash)) (λ args (hash-ref! table args (thunk (apply f args))))) (define fusc (memoize (λ (n) (cond [(<= n 1) n] [(even? n) (fusc (/ n 2))] [else (+ (fusc (/ (sub1 n) 2)) (fusc (/ (add1 n) 2)))])))) (de...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Racket to Go.
#lang racket (require racket/generator) (define (memoize f) (define table (make-hash)) (λ args (hash-ref! table args (thunk (apply f args))))) (define fusc (memoize (λ (n) (cond [(<= n 1) n] [(even? n) (fusc (/ n 2))] [else (+ (fusc (/ (sub1 n) 2)) (fusc (/ (add1 n) 2)))])))) (de...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original REXX code.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Generate a C# translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from REXX to C++.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Convert the following code from REXX to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Convert this REXX block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this REXX implementation.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original REXX code.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Port the following code from REXX to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Port the provided REXX code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Translate the given REXX code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this REXX implementation.
parse arg st # xw . if st=='' | st=="," then st= 0 if #=='' | #=="," then #= 61 if xw=='' | xw=="," then xw= 0 list= xw<1 @.=; @.0= 0; @.1= 1 mL= 0 ...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ruby code in C.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ruby to C, same semantics.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ruby to C# without modifying what it does.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ruby code in C#.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this Ruby code.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in Ruby.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Write a version of this Ruby function in Java with identical behavior.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Ruby code.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Write a version of this Ruby function in VB with identical behavior.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Write a version of this Ruby function in VB with identical behavior.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ruby to Go, same semantics.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Transform the following Ruby implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
fusc = Enumerator.new do |y| y << 0 y << 1 arr = [0,1] 2.step do |n| res = n.even? ? arr[n/2] : arr[(n-1)/2] + arr[(n+1)/2] y << res arr << res end end fusc_max_digits = Enumerator.new do |y| cur_max, cur_exp = 0, 0 0.step do |i| f = fusc.next if f >= cur_max cur_exp +...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Generate a C translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Transform the following Scala implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Generate a C# translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Scala snippet.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Convert this Scala snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Translate the given Scala code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Generate a Java translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Convert this Scala snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Generate a Python translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Translate the given Scala code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Scala version.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Convert this Scala snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Scala code.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Scala.
fun fusc(n: Int): IntArray { if (n <= 0) return intArrayOf() if (n == 1) return intArrayOf(0) val res = IntArray(n) res[1] = 1 for (i in 2 until n) { if (i % 2 == 0) { res[i] = res[i / 2] } else { res[i] = res[(i - 1) / 2] + res[(i + 1) / 2] } } ...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Port the following code from Swift to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original Swift code.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Transform the following Swift implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Convert this Swift block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Swift to C++ without modifying what it does.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Swift implementation.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Convert this Swift snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Swift code.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Convert this Swift snippet to VB and keep its semantics consistent.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Write the same algorithm in VB as shown in this Swift implementation.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Swift code in Go.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Port the provided Swift code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
struct FuscSeq: Sequence, IteratorProtocol { private var arr = [0, 1] private var i = 0 mutating func next() -> Int? { defer { i += 1 } guard i > 1 else { return arr[i] } switch i & 1 { case 0: arr.append(arr[i / 2]) case 1: arr.append(arr[(i - 1) / 2] + arr[...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to C.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to C.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
Generate a C# translation of this Tcl snippet without changing its computational steps.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Tcl.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Tcl implementation.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Transform the following Tcl implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Tcl to Java without modifying what it does.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
Convert this Tcl snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Port the following code from Tcl to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Tcl version.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Write a version of this Tcl function in Go with identical behavior.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
proc fusc n { if {$n < 2} { return $n } if {[info exists ::g_fusc($n)]} { return $::g_fusc($n) } if {$n % 2} { ; set r [expr {[fusc [expr {($n-1)/2}]] + [fusc [expr {($n+1)/2}]]}] } else { ; set r [fusc [expr {$n/2}]] } if {$n < 999...
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
Port the following code from C to Rust with equivalent syntax and logic.
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Produce a functionally identical Rust code for the snippet given in C++.
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Convert this C++ snippet to Rust and keep its semantics consistent.
#include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <sstream> #include <vector> const int n = 61; std::vector<int> l{ 0, 1 }; int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.size()) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.push_back(f); return f; } int main() { ...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Change the following C# code into Rust without altering its purpose.
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Rust.
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Rewrite this program in Rust while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Java version.
public class FuscSequence { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Show the first 61 fusc numbers (starting at zero) in a horizontal format"); for ( int n = 0 ; n < 61 ; n++ ) { System.out.printf("%,d ", fusc[n]); } System.out.printf("%n%nS...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Convert this Go snippet to Rust and keep its semantics consistent.
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Rust snippet.
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Rust.
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Convert this Rust block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Module Module1 Dim n As Integer = 61, l As List(Of Integer) = {0, 1}.ToList Function fusc(n As Integer) As Integer If n < l.Count Then Return l(n) fusc = If((n And 1) = 0, l(n >> 1), l((n - 1) >> 1) + l((n + 1) >> 1)) l.Add(fusc) End Function Sub Main(args As String()) ...
Generate a Rust translation of this Go snippet without changing its computational steps.
package main import ( "fmt" "strconv" ) func fusc(n int) []int { if n <= 0 { return []int{} } if n == 1 { return []int{0} } res := make([]int, n) res[0] = 0 res[1] = 1 for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if i%2 == 0 { res[i] = res[i/2] } els...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Rust instead of C, keeping it the same logically?
#include<limits.h> #include<stdio.h> int fusc(int n){ if(n==0||n==1) return n; else if(n%2==0) return fusc(n/2); else return fusc((n-1)/2) + fusc((n+1)/2); } int numLen(int n){ int sum = 1; while(n>9){ n = n/10; ...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from C# to Rust without modifying what it does.
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; static class program { static int n = 61; static List<int> l = new List<int>() { 0, 1 }; static int fusc(int n) { if (n < l.Count) return l[n]; int f = (n & 1) == 0 ? l[n >> 1] : l[(n - 1) >> 1] + l[(n + 1) >> 1]; l.Add(f); return...
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Rust, keeping it the same logically?
fn fusc_sequence() -> impl std::iter::Iterator<Item = u32> { let mut sequence = vec![0, 1]; let mut n = 0; std::iter::from_fn(move || { if n > 1 { sequence.push(match n % 2 { 0 => sequence[n / 2], _ => sequence[(n - 1) / 2] + sequence[(n + 1) / 2], ...
from collections import deque from itertools import islice, count def fusc(): q = deque([1]) yield 0 yield 1 while True: x = q.popleft() q.append(x) yield x x += q[0] q.append(x) yield x def longest_fusc(): sofar = 0 for i, f in zip(count(), ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
with Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists; with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io; procedure Traversal_Example is package Int_List is new Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists(Integer); use Int_List; procedure Print(Position : Cursor) is begin Put_Line(Integer'Image(Element(Position))); end Print; The_Li...
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Port the provided Ada code into C while preserving the original functionality.
with Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists; with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io; procedure Traversal_Example is package Int_List is new Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists(Integer); use Int_List; procedure Print(Position : Cursor) is begin Put_Line(Integer'Image(Element(Position))); end Print; The_Li...
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Change the following Ada code into C++ without altering its purpose.
with Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists; with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io; procedure Traversal_Example is package Int_List is new Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists(Integer); use Int_List; procedure Print(Position : Cursor) is begin Put_Line(Integer'Image(Element(Position))); end Print; The_Li...
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in Ada.
with Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists; with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io; procedure Traversal_Example is package Int_List is new Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists(Integer); use Int_List; procedure Print(Position : Cursor) is begin Put_Line(Integer'Image(Element(Position))); end Print; The_Li...
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Ada snippet.
with Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists; with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io; procedure Traversal_Example is package Int_List is new Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists(Integer); use Int_List; procedure Print(Position : Cursor) is begin Put_Line(Integer'Image(Element(Position))); end Print; The_Li...
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Port the provided Ada code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
with Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists; with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io; procedure Traversal_Example is package Int_List is new Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists(Integer); use Int_List; procedure Print(Position : Cursor) is begin Put_Line(Integer'Image(Element(Position))); end Print; The_Li...
for node in lst: print node.value
Write the same algorithm in VB as shown in this Ada implementation.
with Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists; with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io; procedure Traversal_Example is package Int_List is new Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_Lists(Integer); use Int_List; procedure Print(Position : Cursor) is begin Put_Line(Integer'Image(Element(Position))); end Print; The_Li...
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
a = 1 a_next = b b = 2 b_next = c c = 3 traverse("a") return traverse(element) { MsgBox % element . "= " . %element% name := element . "_next" while, %name% { element := %name% msgbox % %name% . "= " . %element% name := %name% . "_next" } }
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Please provide an equivalent version of this AutoHotKey code in C#.
a = 1 a_next = b b = 2 b_next = c c = 3 traverse("a") return traverse(element) { MsgBox % element . "= " . %element% name := element . "_next" while, %name% { element := %name% msgbox % %name% . "= " . %element% name := %name% . "_next" } }
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Convert this AutoHotKey snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
a = 1 a_next = b b = 2 b_next = c c = 3 traverse("a") return traverse(element) { MsgBox % element . "= " . %element% name := element . "_next" while, %name% { element := %name% msgbox % %name% . "= " . %element% name := %name% . "_next" } }
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Generate a Java translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps.
a = 1 a_next = b b = 2 b_next = c c = 3 traverse("a") return traverse(element) { MsgBox % element . "= " . %element% name := element . "_next" while, %name% { element := %name% msgbox % %name% . "= " . %element% name := %name% . "_next" } }
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }