Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Change the following AutoHotKey code into Python without altering its purpose.
a = 1 a_next = b b = 2 b_next = c c = 3 traverse("a") return traverse(element) { MsgBox % element . "= " . %element% name := element . "_next" while, %name% { element := %name% msgbox % %name% . "= " . %element% name := %name% . "_next" } }
for node in lst: print node.value
Write the same code in VB as shown below in AutoHotKey.
a = 1 a_next = b b = 2 b_next = c c = 3 traverse("a") return traverse(element) { MsgBox % element . "= " . %element% name := element . "_next" while, %name% { element := %name% msgbox % %name% . "= " . %element% name := %name% . "_next" } }
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Write the same code in Go as shown below in AutoHotKey.
a = 1 a_next = b b = 2 b_next = c c = 3 traverse("a") return traverse(element) { MsgBox % element . "= " . %element% name := element . "_next" while, %name% { element := %name% msgbox % %name% . "= " . %element% name := %name% . "_next" } }
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in BBC_Basic.
DIM node{pNext%, iData%} DIM a{} = node{}, b{} = node{}, c{} = node{} a.pNext% = b{} a.iData% = 123 b.iData% = 789 c.iData% = 456 PROCinsert(a{}, c{}) PRINT "Traverse list:" pnode% = a{} REPEAT !(^node{}+4) = pnode% PRINT node.iData% pnode% = node.pNext% UNTIL pnode% = 0 END DEF PROCinsert(here{}, new{}) new.pNext% = here.pNext% here.pNext% = new{} ENDPROC
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this BBC_Basic implementation.
DIM node{pNext%, iData%} DIM a{} = node{}, b{} = node{}, c{} = node{} a.pNext% = b{} a.iData% = 123 b.iData% = 789 c.iData% = 456 PROCinsert(a{}, c{}) PRINT "Traverse list:" pnode% = a{} REPEAT !(^node{}+4) = pnode% PRINT node.iData% pnode% = node.pNext% UNTIL pnode% = 0 END DEF PROCinsert(here{}, new{}) new.pNext% = here.pNext% here.pNext% = new{} ENDPROC
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Port the provided BBC_Basic code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
DIM node{pNext%, iData%} DIM a{} = node{}, b{} = node{}, c{} = node{} a.pNext% = b{} a.iData% = 123 b.iData% = 789 c.iData% = 456 PROCinsert(a{}, c{}) PRINT "Traverse list:" pnode% = a{} REPEAT !(^node{}+4) = pnode% PRINT node.iData% pnode% = node.pNext% UNTIL pnode% = 0 END DEF PROCinsert(here{}, new{}) new.pNext% = here.pNext% here.pNext% = new{} ENDPROC
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
DIM node{pNext%, iData%} DIM a{} = node{}, b{} = node{}, c{} = node{} a.pNext% = b{} a.iData% = 123 b.iData% = 789 c.iData% = 456 PROCinsert(a{}, c{}) PRINT "Traverse list:" pnode% = a{} REPEAT !(^node{}+4) = pnode% PRINT node.iData% pnode% = node.pNext% UNTIL pnode% = 0 END DEF PROCinsert(here{}, new{}) new.pNext% = here.pNext% here.pNext% = new{} ENDPROC
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Transform the following BBC_Basic implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
DIM node{pNext%, iData%} DIM a{} = node{}, b{} = node{}, c{} = node{} a.pNext% = b{} a.iData% = 123 b.iData% = 789 c.iData% = 456 PROCinsert(a{}, c{}) PRINT "Traverse list:" pnode% = a{} REPEAT !(^node{}+4) = pnode% PRINT node.iData% pnode% = node.pNext% UNTIL pnode% = 0 END DEF PROCinsert(here{}, new{}) new.pNext% = here.pNext% here.pNext% = new{} ENDPROC
for node in lst: print node.value
Port the provided BBC_Basic code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
DIM node{pNext%, iData%} DIM a{} = node{}, b{} = node{}, c{} = node{} a.pNext% = b{} a.iData% = 123 b.iData% = 789 c.iData% = 456 PROCinsert(a{}, c{}) PRINT "Traverse list:" pnode% = a{} REPEAT !(^node{}+4) = pnode% PRINT node.iData% pnode% = node.pNext% UNTIL pnode% = 0 END DEF PROCinsert(here{}, new{}) new.pNext% = here.pNext% here.pNext% = new{} ENDPROC
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of BBC_Basic, keeping it the same logically?
DIM node{pNext%, iData%} DIM a{} = node{}, b{} = node{}, c{} = node{} a.pNext% = b{} a.iData% = 123 b.iData% = 789 c.iData% = 456 PROCinsert(a{}, c{}) PRINT "Traverse list:" pnode% = a{} REPEAT !(^node{}+4) = pnode% PRINT node.iData% pnode% = node.pNext% UNTIL pnode% = 0 END DEF PROCinsert(here{}, new{}) new.pNext% = here.pNext% here.pNext% = new{} ENDPROC
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in Common_Lisp.
(defun traverse (xs) (if (endp xs) (cw "End.~%") (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs)) (traverse (rest xs)))))
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Common_Lisp.
(defun traverse (xs) (if (endp xs) (cw "End.~%") (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs)) (traverse (rest xs)))))
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Common_Lisp to C++.
(defun traverse (xs) (if (endp xs) (cw "End.~%") (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs)) (traverse (rest xs)))))
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Convert this Common_Lisp block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
(defun traverse (xs) (if (endp xs) (cw "End.~%") (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs)) (traverse (rest xs)))))
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Common_Lisp code.
(defun traverse (xs) (if (endp xs) (cw "End.~%") (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs)) (traverse (rest xs)))))
for node in lst: print node.value
Port the following code from Common_Lisp to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
(defun traverse (xs) (if (endp xs) (cw "End.~%") (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs)) (traverse (rest xs)))))
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Common_Lisp code.
(defun traverse (xs) (if (endp xs) (cw "End.~%") (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs)) (traverse (rest xs)))))
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original D snippet.
struct SLinkedNode(T) { T data; typeof(this)* next; } void main() { import std.stdio; alias N = SLinkedNode!int; auto lh = new N(1, new N(2, new N(3, new N(4)))); for (auto p = lh; p; p = p.next) write(p.data, " "); writeln(); }
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Write a version of this D function in C# with identical behavior.
struct SLinkedNode(T) { T data; typeof(this)* next; } void main() { import std.stdio; alias N = SLinkedNode!int; auto lh = new N(1, new N(2, new N(3, new N(4)))); for (auto p = lh; p; p = p.next) write(p.data, " "); writeln(); }
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in D.
struct SLinkedNode(T) { T data; typeof(this)* next; } void main() { import std.stdio; alias N = SLinkedNode!int; auto lh = new N(1, new N(2, new N(3, new N(4)))); for (auto p = lh; p; p = p.next) write(p.data, " "); writeln(); }
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Change the following D code into Java without altering its purpose.
struct SLinkedNode(T) { T data; typeof(this)* next; } void main() { import std.stdio; alias N = SLinkedNode!int; auto lh = new N(1, new N(2, new N(3, new N(4)))); for (auto p = lh; p; p = p.next) write(p.data, " "); writeln(); }
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Write a version of this D function in Python with identical behavior.
struct SLinkedNode(T) { T data; typeof(this)* next; } void main() { import std.stdio; alias N = SLinkedNode!int; auto lh = new N(1, new N(2, new N(3, new N(4)))); for (auto p = lh; p; p = p.next) write(p.data, " "); writeln(); }
for node in lst: print node.value
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from D to VB.
struct SLinkedNode(T) { T data; typeof(this)* next; } void main() { import std.stdio; alias N = SLinkedNode!int; auto lh = new N(1, new N(2, new N(3, new N(4)))); for (auto p = lh; p; p = p.next) write(p.data, " "); writeln(); }
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original D code.
struct SLinkedNode(T) { T data; typeof(this)* next; } void main() { import std.stdio; alias N = SLinkedNode!int; auto lh = new N(1, new N(2, new N(3, new N(4)))); for (auto p = lh; p; p = p.next) write(p.data, " "); writeln(); }
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Delphi code.
uses system ; type plist = ^List ; List = record data : pointer ; next : pList ; end; begin while not (pList^.Next = NIL) do pList := pList^.Next ; end;
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Transform the following Delphi implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
uses system ; type plist = ^List ; List = record data : pointer ; next : pList ; end; begin while not (pList^.Next = NIL) do pList := pList^.Next ; end;
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Delphi.
uses system ; type plist = ^List ; List = record data : pointer ; next : pList ; end; begin while not (pList^.Next = NIL) do pList := pList^.Next ; end;
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Convert this Delphi snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
uses system ; type plist = ^List ; List = record data : pointer ; next : pList ; end; begin while not (pList^.Next = NIL) do pList := pList^.Next ; end;
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Delphi implementation.
uses system ; type plist = ^List ; List = record data : pointer ; next : pList ; end; begin while not (pList^.Next = NIL) do pList := pList^.Next ; end;
for node in lst: print node.value
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original Delphi code.
uses system ; type plist = ^List ; List = record data : pointer ; next : pList ; end; begin while not (pList^.Next = NIL) do pList := pList^.Next ; end;
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Delphi version.
uses system ; type plist = ^List ; List = record data : pointer ; next : pList ; end; begin while not (pList^.Next = NIL) do pList := pList^.Next ; end;
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Factor, keeping it the same logically?
: list-each ( linked-list quot: ( data -- ) -- ) [ [ data>> ] dip call ] [ [ next>> ] dip over [ list-each ] [ 2drop ] if ] 2bi ; inline recursive SYMBOLS: A B C ; A <linked-list> [ C <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ B <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ . ] list-each
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Generate a C# translation of this Factor snippet without changing its computational steps.
: list-each ( linked-list quot: ( data -- ) -- ) [ [ data>> ] dip call ] [ [ next>> ] dip over [ list-each ] [ 2drop ] if ] 2bi ; inline recursive SYMBOLS: A B C ; A <linked-list> [ C <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ B <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ . ] list-each
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Factor snippet.
: list-each ( linked-list quot: ( data -- ) -- ) [ [ data>> ] dip call ] [ [ next>> ] dip over [ list-each ] [ 2drop ] if ] 2bi ; inline recursive SYMBOLS: A B C ; A <linked-list> [ C <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ B <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ . ] list-each
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original Factor code.
: list-each ( linked-list quot: ( data -- ) -- ) [ [ data>> ] dip call ] [ [ next>> ] dip over [ list-each ] [ 2drop ] if ] 2bi ; inline recursive SYMBOLS: A B C ; A <linked-list> [ C <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ B <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ . ] list-each
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Produce a functionally identical Python code for the snippet given in Factor.
: list-each ( linked-list quot: ( data -- ) -- ) [ [ data>> ] dip call ] [ [ next>> ] dip over [ list-each ] [ 2drop ] if ] 2bi ; inline recursive SYMBOLS: A B C ; A <linked-list> [ C <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ B <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ . ] list-each
for node in lst: print node.value
Port the provided Factor code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
: list-each ( linked-list quot: ( data -- ) -- ) [ [ data>> ] dip call ] [ [ next>> ] dip over [ list-each ] [ 2drop ] if ] 2bi ; inline recursive SYMBOLS: A B C ; A <linked-list> [ C <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ B <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ . ] list-each
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Convert the following code from Factor to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
: list-each ( linked-list quot: ( data -- ) -- ) [ [ data>> ] dip call ] [ [ next>> ] dip over [ list-each ] [ 2drop ] if ] 2bi ; inline recursive SYMBOLS: A B C ; A <linked-list> [ C <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ B <linked-list> list-insert ] keep [ . ] list-each
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Change the following Forth code into C without altering its purpose.
: last begin dup @ while @ repeat ;
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Forth to C#, same semantics.
: last begin dup @ while @ repeat ;
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Forth.
: last begin dup @ while @ repeat ;
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Forth to Java without modifying what it does.
: last begin dup @ while @ repeat ;
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Port the provided Forth code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
: last begin dup @ while @ repeat ;
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Change the programming language of this snippet from Forth to Go without modifying what it does.
: last begin dup @ while @ repeat ;
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Port the provided Fortran code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
subroutine traversal(list,proc) type(node), target :: list type(node), pointer :: current interface subroutine proc(node) real, intent(in) :: node end subroutine proc end interface current => list do while ( associated(current) ) call proc(current%data) current => current%next end do end subroutine traversal
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Convert this Fortran snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
subroutine traversal(list,proc) type(node), target :: list type(node), pointer :: current interface subroutine proc(node) real, intent(in) :: node end subroutine proc end interface current => list do while ( associated(current) ) call proc(current%data) current => current%next end do end subroutine traversal
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Write a version of this Fortran function in C with identical behavior.
subroutine traversal(list,proc) type(node), target :: list type(node), pointer :: current interface subroutine proc(node) real, intent(in) :: node end subroutine proc end interface current => list do while ( associated(current) ) call proc(current%data) current => current%next end do end subroutine traversal
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Transform the following Fortran implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
subroutine traversal(list,proc) type(node), target :: list type(node), pointer :: current interface subroutine proc(node) real, intent(in) :: node end subroutine proc end interface current => list do while ( associated(current) ) call proc(current%data) current => current%next end do end subroutine traversal
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
subroutine traversal(list,proc) type(node), target :: list type(node), pointer :: current interface subroutine proc(node) real, intent(in) :: node end subroutine proc end interface current => list do while ( associated(current) ) call proc(current%data) current => current%next end do end subroutine traversal
for node in lst: print node.value
Port the provided Fortran code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
subroutine traversal(list,proc) type(node), target :: list type(node), pointer :: current interface subroutine proc(node) real, intent(in) :: node end subroutine proc end interface current => list do while ( associated(current) ) call proc(current%data) current => current%next end do end subroutine traversal
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Port the following code from Haskell to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
map (>5) [1..10] map (++ "s") ["Apple", "Orange", "Mango", "Pear"] foldr (+) 0 [1..10] traverse :: [a] -> [a] traverse list = map func list where func a =
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
map (>5) [1..10] map (++ "s") ["Apple", "Orange", "Mango", "Pear"] foldr (+) 0 [1..10] traverse :: [a] -> [a] traverse list = map func list where func a =
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Haskell.
map (>5) [1..10] map (++ "s") ["Apple", "Orange", "Mango", "Pear"] foldr (+) 0 [1..10] traverse :: [a] -> [a] traverse list = map func list where func a =
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Change the following Haskell code into Java without altering its purpose.
map (>5) [1..10] map (++ "s") ["Apple", "Orange", "Mango", "Pear"] foldr (+) 0 [1..10] traverse :: [a] -> [a] traverse list = map func list where func a =
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Haskell.
map (>5) [1..10] map (++ "s") ["Apple", "Orange", "Mango", "Pear"] foldr (+) 0 [1..10] traverse :: [a] -> [a] traverse list = map func list where func a =
for node in lst: print node.value
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
map (>5) [1..10] map (++ "s") ["Apple", "Orange", "Mango", "Pear"] foldr (+) 0 [1..10] traverse :: [a] -> [a] traverse list = map func list where func a =
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Haskell to Go.
map (>5) [1..10] map (++ "s") ["Apple", "Orange", "Mango", "Pear"] foldr (+) 0 [1..10] traverse :: [a] -> [a] traverse list = map func list where func a =
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Convert this Icon block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
procedure main () ns := Node(1, Node(2, Node (3))) until /ns do { write (ns.value) ns := ns.successor } end
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Icon implementation.
procedure main () ns := Node(1, Node(2, Node (3))) until /ns do { write (ns.value) ns := ns.successor } end
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Icon version.
procedure main () ns := Node(1, Node(2, Node (3))) until /ns do { write (ns.value) ns := ns.successor } end
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in Icon.
procedure main () ns := Node(1, Node(2, Node (3))) until /ns do { write (ns.value) ns := ns.successor } end
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Icon snippet.
procedure main () ns := Node(1, Node(2, Node (3))) until /ns do { write (ns.value) ns := ns.successor } end
for node in lst: print node.value
Port the following code from Icon to VB with equivalent syntax and logic.
procedure main () ns := Node(1, Node(2, Node (3))) until /ns do { write (ns.value) ns := ns.successor } end
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Icon code.
procedure main () ns := Node(1, Node(2, Node (3))) until /ns do { write (ns.value) ns := ns.successor } end
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original J code.
foo"0 {:"1 list
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original J code.
foo"0 {:"1 list
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Generate a C++ translation of this J snippet without changing its computational steps.
foo"0 {:"1 list
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in J.
foo"0 {:"1 list
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the J version.
foo"0 {:"1 list
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from J to Go, same semantics.
foo"0 {:"1 list
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Write a version of this Julia function in C with identical behavior.
Base.start(ll::LinkedList) = ll.head Base.done(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st isa EmptyNode Base.next(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st.data, st.next lst = LinkedList{Int}() push!(lst, 1) push!(lst, 2) push!(lst, 3) for n in lst print(n, " ") end
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Julia to C# without modifying what it does.
Base.start(ll::LinkedList) = ll.head Base.done(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st isa EmptyNode Base.next(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st.data, st.next lst = LinkedList{Int}() push!(lst, 1) push!(lst, 2) push!(lst, 3) for n in lst print(n, " ") end
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Julia.
Base.start(ll::LinkedList) = ll.head Base.done(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st isa EmptyNode Base.next(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st.data, st.next lst = LinkedList{Int}() push!(lst, 1) push!(lst, 2) push!(lst, 3) for n in lst print(n, " ") end
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Julia to Java, same semantics.
Base.start(ll::LinkedList) = ll.head Base.done(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st isa EmptyNode Base.next(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st.data, st.next lst = LinkedList{Int}() push!(lst, 1) push!(lst, 2) push!(lst, 3) for n in lst print(n, " ") end
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
Base.start(ll::LinkedList) = ll.head Base.done(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st isa EmptyNode Base.next(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st.data, st.next lst = LinkedList{Int}() push!(lst, 1) push!(lst, 2) push!(lst, 3) for n in lst print(n, " ") end
for node in lst: print node.value
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Julia, keeping it the same logically?
Base.start(ll::LinkedList) = ll.head Base.done(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st isa EmptyNode Base.next(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st.data, st.next lst = LinkedList{Int}() push!(lst, 1) push!(lst, 2) push!(lst, 3) for n in lst print(n, " ") end
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Transform the following Julia implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
Base.start(ll::LinkedList) = ll.head Base.done(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st isa EmptyNode Base.next(ll::LinkedList{T}, st::AbstractNode{T}) where T = st.data, st.next lst = LinkedList{Int}() push!(lst, 1) push!(lst, 2) push!(lst, 3) for n in lst print(n, " ") end
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Mathematica, keeping it the same logically?
Print /@ {"rosettacode", "kitten", "sitting", "rosettacode", "raisethysword"}
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Mathematica.
Print /@ {"rosettacode", "kitten", "sitting", "rosettacode", "raisethysword"}
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Convert the following code from Mathematica to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
Print /@ {"rosettacode", "kitten", "sitting", "rosettacode", "raisethysword"}
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Change the following Mathematica code into Java without altering its purpose.
Print /@ {"rosettacode", "kitten", "sitting", "rosettacode", "raisethysword"}
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Convert this Mathematica block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
Print /@ {"rosettacode", "kitten", "sitting", "rosettacode", "raisethysword"}
for node in lst: print node.value
Convert this Mathematica block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
Print /@ {"rosettacode", "kitten", "sitting", "rosettacode", "raisethysword"}
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Mathematica.
Print /@ {"rosettacode", "kitten", "sitting", "rosettacode", "raisethysword"}
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Please provide an equivalent version of this MATLAB code in C.
list = 1:10; for k=1:length(list) printf(' end;
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this MATLAB implementation.
list = 1:10; for k=1:length(list) printf(' end;
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
list = 1:10; for k=1:length(list) printf(' end;
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Convert the following code from MATLAB to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
list = 1:10; for k=1:length(list) printf(' end;
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Please provide an equivalent version of this MATLAB code in VB.
list = 1:10; for k=1:length(list) printf(' end;
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original MATLAB snippet.
list = 1:10; for k=1:length(list) printf(' end;
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
type Node[T] = ref object next: Node[T] data: T proc newNode[T](data: T): Node[T] = Node[T](data: data) var a = newNode 12 var b = newNode 13 var c = newNode 14 proc insertAppend(a, n: var Node) = n.next = a.next a.next = n a.insertAppend(b) b.insertAppend(c) iterator items(a: Node) = var x = a while not x.isNil: yield x x = x.next for item in a: echo item.data
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
type Node[T] = ref object next: Node[T] data: T proc newNode[T](data: T): Node[T] = Node[T](data: data) var a = newNode 12 var b = newNode 13 var c = newNode 14 proc insertAppend(a, n: var Node) = n.next = a.next a.next = n a.insertAppend(b) b.insertAppend(c) iterator items(a: Node) = var x = a while not x.isNil: yield x x = x.next for item in a: echo item.data
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Nim snippet.
type Node[T] = ref object next: Node[T] data: T proc newNode[T](data: T): Node[T] = Node[T](data: data) var a = newNode 12 var b = newNode 13 var c = newNode 14 proc insertAppend(a, n: var Node) = n.next = a.next a.next = n a.insertAppend(b) b.insertAppend(c) iterator items(a: Node) = var x = a while not x.isNil: yield x x = x.next for item in a: echo item.data
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Nim implementation.
type Node[T] = ref object next: Node[T] data: T proc newNode[T](data: T): Node[T] = Node[T](data: data) var a = newNode 12 var b = newNode 13 var c = newNode 14 proc insertAppend(a, n: var Node) = n.next = a.next a.next = n a.insertAppend(b) b.insertAppend(c) iterator items(a: Node) = var x = a while not x.isNil: yield x x = x.next for item in a: echo item.data
LinkedList<Type> list = new LinkedList<Type>(); for(Type i: list){ System.out.println(i); }
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Nim code.
type Node[T] = ref object next: Node[T] data: T proc newNode[T](data: T): Node[T] = Node[T](data: data) var a = newNode 12 var b = newNode 13 var c = newNode 14 proc insertAppend(a, n: var Node) = n.next = a.next a.next = n a.insertAppend(b) b.insertAppend(c) iterator items(a: Node) = var x = a while not x.isNil: yield x x = x.next for item in a: echo item.data
for node in lst: print node.value
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Nim.
type Node[T] = ref object next: Node[T] data: T proc newNode[T](data: T): Node[T] = Node[T](data: data) var a = newNode 12 var b = newNode 13 var c = newNode 14 proc insertAppend(a, n: var Node) = n.next = a.next a.next = n a.insertAppend(b) b.insertAppend(c) iterator items(a: Node) = var x = a while not x.isNil: yield x x = x.next for item in a: echo item.data
Private Sub Iterate(ByVal list As LinkedList(Of Integer)) Dim node = list.First Do Until node Is Nothing node = node.Next Loop End Sub
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Nim.
type Node[T] = ref object next: Node[T] data: T proc newNode[T](data: T): Node[T] = Node[T](data: data) var a = newNode 12 var b = newNode 13 var c = newNode 14 proc insertAppend(a, n: var Node) = n.next = a.next a.next = n a.insertAppend(b) b.insertAppend(c) iterator items(a: Node) = var x = a while not x.isNil: yield x x = x.next for item in a: echo item.data
start := &Ele{"tacos", nil} end := start.Append("burritos") end = end.Append("fajitas") end = end.Append("enchilatas") for iter := start; iter != nil; iter = iter.Next { fmt.Println(iter) }
Translate the given OCaml code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
# let li = ["big"; "fjords"; "vex"; "quick"; "waltz"; "nymph"] in List.iter print_endline li ;; big fjords vex quick waltz nymph - : unit = ()
struct link *first; struct link *iter; for(iter = first; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) { }
Please provide an equivalent version of this OCaml code in C#.
# let li = ["big"; "fjords"; "vex"; "quick"; "waltz"; "nymph"] in List.iter print_endline li ;; big fjords vex quick waltz nymph - : unit = ()
var current = [head of list to traverse] while(current != null) { current = current.Next; }
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this OCaml code.
# let li = ["big"; "fjords"; "vex"; "quick"; "waltz"; "nymph"] in List.iter print_endline li ;; big fjords vex quick waltz nymph - : unit = ()
#include <iostream> #include <forward_list> int main() { std::forward_list<int> list{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; for (int e : list) std::cout << e << std::endl; }