prompt stringlengths 22 39.2k | prompt_id stringlengths 64 64 | chosen listlengths 2 2 | rejected listlengths 2 2 | messages listlengths 2 2 | score_chosen float64 5.19 10 | score_rejected float64 0 10 | other_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 6.923077 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 30,
"raw_score_ratio": 10,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 4014,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 6.923077 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 30,
"raw_score_ratio": 10,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 10347,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 6.794872 | 4.683761 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 28,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.1111111111,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 2149,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 6.794872 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 28,
"raw_score_ratio": 9.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 3926,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 6.410256 | 4.965812 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4444444444,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 17959,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 6.410256 | 0.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 13403,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 6.410256 | 0.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 19736,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.576923 | 3.576923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 1777,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.512821 | 3.846154 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 17165,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.512821 | 3.846154 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 23498,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.512821 | 2.512821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 119,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.448718 | 4.115385 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 18107,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.448718 | 4.115385 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 24440,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.448718 | 2.948718 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 1061,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 28582,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 30049,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 34915,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 11536,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 36382,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 13003,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 13579,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate school? My advisor has funds for me to use for research from his grant so that I don't have to teach in my final semester. Unfortunately my department is denying the request and forcing me to teach a course to be funded since they are low on teachers. 75% of other students are being allowed to use research funding in my department, and I am one of the 5 who is not being allowed. The reasoning is because of timing and a change of policy that once the department determined they were running low on instructors they started denying requests for research funding. I have exhausted avenues within my department and have still been denied. I do have a lot of savings and could afford not to be funded at all. Honestly, I am tempted to deny teaching altogether. Of course I would not earn my 10-15K + health insurance + tuition benefit that I would get for research funding or teaching or being on the grant for research, but it is doable and honestly tempting to me right now. I am really upset about this. Teaching takes 20-30 hours a week of my time. I am going into my last semester and need time to finish my thesis, find a job, and everything else that comes with graduating. I simply do not have time to teach and have been counting on this funding from my advisor. I think it is completely ludicrous that the department is telling my advisor he cannot fund me using the grant money which was set aside for me. Can you think of anything I can do to fight this? It seems both immoral and illegal to me. Should I contact the graduate school or the dean of students? Do I have any legal recourse for this? It just feels they are stealing the grant money from me because they won't allow my advisor to give me the grant money meaning I am forced to teach if I want to get paid. If anyone has any ideas, I am open to hear them. I can also clarify things if anything is unclear. Thank you. | c5e82b9a50a3d73507a1a554d90695a7d23d8283eff63b421554bf92286619e7 | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | [
{
"content": "Department forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to fund me from a grant TLDR: My department is forcing me to teach a course even though my advisor has funds available to pay me from a grant. Is this even legal? Should I contact the dean of students or graduate s... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qnu5lt",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 19072,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.86
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 7.435897 | 6.852564 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 38,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5833333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 24,
"seconds_difference": 3270,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 6.282051 | 2.282051 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 20,
"raw_score_ratio": 5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 842,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.384615 | 4.884615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 10507,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.320513 | 5.070513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 25930,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.384615 | 3.384615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 7151,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 10055,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 22574,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 9019,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 7018,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously retain students for years on end, when they stop getting their salaries. I know for a fact that most of them could graduate earlier, but the advisors keep piling on more work on them. Unfortunately due to the friendship between some faculty in the department, you cannot go to someone else if they’re a friend of your PI. What systems does your university have to help graduate students give power to negotiate with the department/faculty? | 064349d2d06c1dfc241c5548112b6ab906892a11e2991005688f9ab13f405241 | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | [
{
"content": "What systems does your university have in place to prevent issues such as advisors not letting students graduate for years on end? Basically, what systems does your university have to mediate conflicts between advisors and students? For example, many advisors in a country I studied in previously r... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ty8x9u",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 12519,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \- Since science sometimes discovers new things or feedback is provided for clarification, this could be continuously changed to the page. \- People can mark a line in the text and add a comment suggesting an improvement or add sources that might disprove or align with the idea. \- Every time the page is updated with information, it becomes a new "version". \- A button on the page exist called "download document and citation" and the citation will include the name of the latest version that was downloaded. \- You will also have access to previous versions, where the text that has been changed is marked in a colour. Questions: \- Do you think this is a good way of holding updated information and managing the citation? \- Do you think this could be applied to academic publications as well? Where the feedback or new discoverings could be data added to a model inside the publication, and the publication would then automatically be updated and uploaded with this extra data using a coding programme. Next gen automated science? \- When would this be a good use and when would it be a bad use? | 71dee1f0278264c39b08ae08e5a93d4fd76b578854eb807eb2aecdf437f9dcf4 | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | 8.461538 | 5.861538 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rkn9jq",
"raw_score_chosen": 54,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 15,
"seconds_difference": 174,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \- Since science sometimes discovers new things or feedback is provided for clarification, this could be continuously changed to the page. \- People can mark a line in the text and add a comment suggesting an improvement or add sources that might disprove or align with the idea. \- Every time the page is updated with information, it becomes a new "version". \- A button on the page exist called "download document and citation" and the citation will include the name of the latest version that was downloaded. \- You will also have access to previous versions, where the text that has been changed is marked in a colour. Questions: \- Do you think this is a good way of holding updated information and managing the citation? \- Do you think this could be applied to academic publications as well? Where the feedback or new discoverings could be data added to a model inside the publication, and the publication would then automatically be updated and uploaded with this extra data using a coding programme. Next gen automated science? \- When would this be a good use and when would it be a bad use? | 71dee1f0278264c39b08ae08e5a93d4fd76b578854eb807eb2aecdf437f9dcf4 | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | 5.833333 | 3.583333 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rkn9jq",
"raw_score_chosen": 13,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 7933,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \- Since science sometimes discovers new things or feedback is provided for clarification, this could be continuously changed to the page. \- People can mark a line in the text and add a comment suggesting an improvement or add sources that might disprove or align with the idea. \- Every time the page is updated with information, it becomes a new "version". \- A button on the page exist called "download document and citation" and the citation will include the name of the latest version that was downloaded. \- You will also have access to previous versions, where the text that has been changed is marked in a colour. Questions: \- Do you think this is a good way of holding updated information and managing the citation? \- Do you think this could be applied to academic publications as well? Where the feedback or new discoverings could be data added to a model inside the publication, and the publication would then automatically be updated and uploaded with this extra data using a coding programme. Next gen automated science? \- When would this be a good use and when would it be a bad use? | 71dee1f0278264c39b08ae08e5a93d4fd76b578854eb807eb2aecdf437f9dcf4 | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | 5.833333 | 0.333333 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rkn9jq",
"raw_score_chosen": 13,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 8369,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \- Since science sometimes discovers new things or feedback is provided for clarification, this could be continuously changed to the page. \- People can mark a line in the text and add a comment suggesting an improvement or add sources that might disprove or align with the idea. \- Every time the page is updated with information, it becomes a new "version". \- A button on the page exist called "download document and citation" and the citation will include the name of the latest version that was downloaded. \- You will also have access to previous versions, where the text that has been changed is marked in a colour. Questions: \- Do you think this is a good way of holding updated information and managing the citation? \- Do you think this could be applied to academic publications as well? Where the feedback or new discoverings could be data added to a model inside the publication, and the publication would then automatically be updated and uploaded with this extra data using a coding programme. Next gen automated science? \- When would this be a good use and when would it be a bad use? | 71dee1f0278264c39b08ae08e5a93d4fd76b578854eb807eb2aecdf437f9dcf4 | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rkn9jq",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 436,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \- Since science sometimes discovers new things or feedback is provided for clarification, this could be continuously changed to the page. \- People can mark a line in the text and add a comment suggesting an improvement or add sources that might disprove or align with the idea. \- Every time the page is updated with information, it becomes a new "version". \- A button on the page exist called "download document and citation" and the citation will include the name of the latest version that was downloaded. \- You will also have access to previous versions, where the text that has been changed is marked in a colour. Questions: \- Do you think this is a good way of holding updated information and managing the citation? \- Do you think this could be applied to academic publications as well? Where the feedback or new discoverings could be data added to a model inside the publication, and the publication would then automatically be updated and uploaded with this extra data using a coding programme. Next gen automated science? \- When would this be a good use and when would it be a bad use? | 71dee1f0278264c39b08ae08e5a93d4fd76b578854eb807eb2aecdf437f9dcf4 | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | [
{
"content": "What do you think of the concept of a continuously changing publication in the form of a website page? How it would work is this: \\- You have a website page that explains a concept with the goal of providing the newest most accurate version of the information. \\- Since science sometimes disco... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rkn9jq",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 20335,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 8.910256 | 3.132479 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 61,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.7777777778,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 243,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 6.217949 | 6.162393 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.0555555556,
"raw_score_rejected": 18,
"seconds_difference": 1709,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 6.217949 | 5.106838 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.1111111111,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 3856,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 6.153846 | 5.153846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 18,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 2147,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 8487,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 28888,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 27275,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 20401,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they aren’t paying you to get it”. Is this still a true statement? Was it ever ? I’m not sure I’m willing to spend another 50k to 100k in loans a doctorate if it would not be taken seriously because I paid for it. I am in social sciences, I know that makes a difference. | 309f2cb3d8b7edcfb32bd779ee6dab65258c44f948fcfacdb81d694052274bb8 | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | [
{
"content": "Should a person get a PhD or EdD if they have to pay for it themselves ? Same as the title, I’ve been mulling the idea recently to go beyond a masters but I’ve been in the work force of academia for almost 20 years without a doctorate. I had always heard the adage, “don’t get a doctorate if they ... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "vnpzp9",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 18788,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.87
} |
How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedical image processing, as is the majority of my supervisor's research output in the past decade. He and I are physiotherapists by first qualification, but this is quite tangential to the research because it's so based on biomedical engineering and epidemiology now. Would you list it as PhD, Biomedical Engineering? It's not in that faculty though... PhD, Musculoskeletal Imaging? That's not even a subject. PhD, Radiological Medicine? I have no clue. | 7dfb169c4225a5f0ac0ef38002599aaa0268571b6dc128f4ba427a0e0aa8e462 | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | 6.089744 | 4.661172 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xg96fs",
"raw_score_chosen": 17,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4285714286,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 629,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.81
} |
How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedical image processing, as is the majority of my supervisor's research output in the past decade. He and I are physiotherapists by first qualification, but this is quite tangential to the research because it's so based on biomedical engineering and epidemiology now. Would you list it as PhD, Biomedical Engineering? It's not in that faculty though... PhD, Musculoskeletal Imaging? That's not even a subject. PhD, Radiological Medicine? I have no clue. | 7dfb169c4225a5f0ac0ef38002599aaa0268571b6dc128f4ba427a0e0aa8e462 | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | 5.512821 | 5.369963 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xg96fs",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1428571429,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 18981,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.81
} |
How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedical image processing, as is the majority of my supervisor's research output in the past decade. He and I are physiotherapists by first qualification, but this is quite tangential to the research because it's so based on biomedical engineering and epidemiology now. Would you list it as PhD, Biomedical Engineering? It's not in that faculty though... PhD, Musculoskeletal Imaging? That's not even a subject. PhD, Radiological Medicine? I have no clue. | 7dfb169c4225a5f0ac0ef38002599aaa0268571b6dc128f4ba427a0e0aa8e462 | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | 5.512821 | 4.512821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xg96fs",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 8962,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.81
} |
How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedical image processing, as is the majority of my supervisor's research output in the past decade. He and I are physiotherapists by first qualification, but this is quite tangential to the research because it's so based on biomedical engineering and epidemiology now. Would you list it as PhD, Biomedical Engineering? It's not in that faculty though... PhD, Musculoskeletal Imaging? That's not even a subject. PhD, Radiological Medicine? I have no clue. | 7dfb169c4225a5f0ac0ef38002599aaa0268571b6dc128f4ba427a0e0aa8e462 | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | [
{
"content": "How do you list a PhD in a resume if it's quite multidisciplinary? This is honestly just semantics, but I also don't want to get in trouble with industry recruiters should something look fishy. My PhD's primary supervisor is in the Faculty of Medicine and Health. My work is predominantly biomedic... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xg96fs",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 28485,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.81
} |
I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funded PhD in a GREAT University in a GREAT environment/lab, but somehow, probably counterintuitively, I think this actually hurts my chances of applying at other universities. ​ **Long Version (Wall of Text warning):** During my Masters' thesis, I made it known to my advisor that I wanted to pursue a PhD instead of going into Industry so we tailored the topic accordingly. Additionally I worked really hard to produce good work and get a good recommendation letter to improve my chances of getting accepted at very competitive Universities. In the end, the professor liked my work and actually straight-up offered me a (fully funded) position at her lab to pursue a PhD. At some point after that I mentioned that my dream university was \[Insert University\] because I didn't want to create the expectation that I'd 100% continue for a PhD at her lab, to which my advisor responded trying to persuade me by listing the lab's Pros vs the Cons of my dream university. All in all, I don't think I'll accept the offer (even though I'm incredibly honored and grateful) because I really want to apply at 3-4 specific Universities. ​ ​ The problem is now twofold: ​ *1) I don't know how to bring this up to my advisor.* First and foremost, I don't want to insult my advisor by somehow implying that this University/PhD/Lab isn't good enough for me. Second, I don't want to sour our relationship for the little remainder of my Master's thesis. If the expectation was that I was somehow being trained/tried for a PhD position at the Lab, will it change the dynamic if I decline? Third, I was counting on her recommendation letter for my applications to these other universities. Asking for a recommendation letter to apply somewhere else feels ... ill-advised? On one hand, I need this recommendation letter for my applications. As you know, the applications for grad school typically require 2-3 recommendation letters and strictly from professors/academics (not from jobs/internships/old teachers etc), therefore I have limited choices. Additionally, how would it look like if I didn't have the recommendation from the professor I did my Master's thesis with? On the other hand, I'm afraid it might be similar to asking the guy you friend-zoned to introduce you to his friend. I've heard stories about professors actually giving negative letters even though the students were made to think otherwise, and they kept being rejected because they didn't know they had a bad recommendation. So who's to say I won't get a bad letter out of spite? I highly doubt my professor is this kind of person, but I can't really know for sure. Am I being paranoid? ​ *2) I have to make my decision before I apply to the other universities.* This offer is for this year, so I have to accept or reject the offer now. If I apply at the other universities, I won't know the result until February/March 2021. I could ask to move the offer for next year on the basis of waiting for all application results, but: *a)* I don't think it's possible (the funding comes from a programme that will start now) *b)* I don't want to practically "accept" the offer for next year unless I'm accepted by my top 3 schools. I feel like postponing the offer for next year could also serve as a motivation for a bad recommendation so I won't get accepted by the other schools (again, paranoia). ​ ​ So my questions to you, /r/askacademia, are: 1. How do I approach my advisor about all this? How do say that I don't think I'll accept the offer but still don't want to burn this bridge / sour the relationship? 2. Should I even ask for a recommendation letter at all? 3. Can I somehow protect myself from bad recommendation letters? 4. Am I paranoid? Please tell me I am... 5. Hypothetically, should I have applied last year (before I was done with my thesis and without the recommendation letter) so that I'd have all results by now? 6. Any other advice? ​ ​ Thank you if you've read my paranoid wall of text. All of your input/thoughts/advice will be greatly appreciated! | 045d5341e4ef41ddc3f0981a725975e045988a9ecd55d9f9c864fe5880bd792f | [
{
"content": "I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funde... | [
{
"content": "I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funde... | [
{
"content": "I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funde... | 6.538462 | 6.395604 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ipnhej",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1428571429,
"raw_score_rejected": 21,
"seconds_difference": 288,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funded PhD in a GREAT University in a GREAT environment/lab, but somehow, probably counterintuitively, I think this actually hurts my chances of applying at other universities. ​ **Long Version (Wall of Text warning):** During my Masters' thesis, I made it known to my advisor that I wanted to pursue a PhD instead of going into Industry so we tailored the topic accordingly. Additionally I worked really hard to produce good work and get a good recommendation letter to improve my chances of getting accepted at very competitive Universities. In the end, the professor liked my work and actually straight-up offered me a (fully funded) position at her lab to pursue a PhD. At some point after that I mentioned that my dream university was \[Insert University\] because I didn't want to create the expectation that I'd 100% continue for a PhD at her lab, to which my advisor responded trying to persuade me by listing the lab's Pros vs the Cons of my dream university. All in all, I don't think I'll accept the offer (even though I'm incredibly honored and grateful) because I really want to apply at 3-4 specific Universities. ​ ​ The problem is now twofold: ​ *1) I don't know how to bring this up to my advisor.* First and foremost, I don't want to insult my advisor by somehow implying that this University/PhD/Lab isn't good enough for me. Second, I don't want to sour our relationship for the little remainder of my Master's thesis. If the expectation was that I was somehow being trained/tried for a PhD position at the Lab, will it change the dynamic if I decline? Third, I was counting on her recommendation letter for my applications to these other universities. Asking for a recommendation letter to apply somewhere else feels ... ill-advised? On one hand, I need this recommendation letter for my applications. As you know, the applications for grad school typically require 2-3 recommendation letters and strictly from professors/academics (not from jobs/internships/old teachers etc), therefore I have limited choices. Additionally, how would it look like if I didn't have the recommendation from the professor I did my Master's thesis with? On the other hand, I'm afraid it might be similar to asking the guy you friend-zoned to introduce you to his friend. I've heard stories about professors actually giving negative letters even though the students were made to think otherwise, and they kept being rejected because they didn't know they had a bad recommendation. So who's to say I won't get a bad letter out of spite? I highly doubt my professor is this kind of person, but I can't really know for sure. Am I being paranoid? ​ *2) I have to make my decision before I apply to the other universities.* This offer is for this year, so I have to accept or reject the offer now. If I apply at the other universities, I won't know the result until February/March 2021. I could ask to move the offer for next year on the basis of waiting for all application results, but: *a)* I don't think it's possible (the funding comes from a programme that will start now) *b)* I don't want to practically "accept" the offer for next year unless I'm accepted by my top 3 schools. I feel like postponing the offer for next year could also serve as a motivation for a bad recommendation so I won't get accepted by the other schools (again, paranoia). ​ ​ So my questions to you, /r/askacademia, are: 1. How do I approach my advisor about all this? How do say that I don't think I'll accept the offer but still don't want to burn this bridge / sour the relationship? 2. Should I even ask for a recommendation letter at all? 3. Can I somehow protect myself from bad recommendation letters? 4. Am I paranoid? Please tell me I am... 5. Hypothetically, should I have applied last year (before I was done with my thesis and without the recommendation letter) so that I'd have all results by now? 6. Any other advice? ​ ​ Thank you if you've read my paranoid wall of text. All of your input/thoughts/advice will be greatly appreciated! | 045d5341e4ef41ddc3f0981a725975e045988a9ecd55d9f9c864fe5880bd792f | [
{
"content": "I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funde... | [
{
"content": "I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funde... | [
{
"content": "I was offered a fully funded PhD position at a great university/lab! ...Is this a bad thing? I'm currently in a very bizarre situation and I need your advice because I'm paralyzed with indecisiveness and paranoia. ​ **Short Version**: During my Masters' Thesis I was offered a fully funde... | 5.384615 | 3.384615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ipnhej",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 10062,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants to co-author the article together. I don't have any background in academia or article writing. Is it a good thing that a professor wants to write with me? What do you think of this? Why would a professor want to write with me? | 1abd5a854b8eb1c1dae8ddad78e96b98a52a9e93beca16c06a68d141e75a6639 | [
{
"content": "thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants... | [
{
"content": "thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants... | [
{
"content": "thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants... | 6.410256 | 0.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "83nyn3",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 1935,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.83
} |
thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants to co-author the article together. I don't have any background in academia or article writing. Is it a good thing that a professor wants to write with me? What do you think of this? Why would a professor want to write with me? | 1abd5a854b8eb1c1dae8ddad78e96b98a52a9e93beca16c06a68d141e75a6639 | [
{
"content": "thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants... | [
{
"content": "thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants... | [
{
"content": "thesis supervisor wants to co-write journal article with me - is this a good thing? I wrote a master's thesis and it was well-received. During my thesis defence, my committee strongly suggested that I write a journal article based on my thesis. My thesis supervisor talked to me privately and wants... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "83nyn3",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 1945,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.83
} |
Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is always a bit of "you're the expert, you know better" coming from them. Seeing that this relationship is going to be about methodology and approach more than content, I always want to share more with them but feel like it is not appropriate. Most of our meetings end up being about general questions of methodology, which are beneficial but I also need more specific advice. For example, would it be appropriate to share with them an overview of what I have so far? (X thousand words on this, Y thousand words on that, a list of this, a list of that, an outline of two chapters...) and have them judge my progress more in detail? Or is this not professional enough? \[One supervisor is British and one is American\] | 4cb318fdf0cb2609ca999aabb7f62c3bc997c8eaadb19974a3d36f8ff7c17fcf | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | 6.794872 | 3.128205 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tcjjmp",
"raw_score_chosen": 28,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 480,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is always a bit of "you're the expert, you know better" coming from them. Seeing that this relationship is going to be about methodology and approach more than content, I always want to share more with them but feel like it is not appropriate. Most of our meetings end up being about general questions of methodology, which are beneficial but I also need more specific advice. For example, would it be appropriate to share with them an overview of what I have so far? (X thousand words on this, Y thousand words on that, a list of this, a list of that, an outline of two chapters...) and have them judge my progress more in detail? Or is this not professional enough? \[One supervisor is British and one is American\] | 4cb318fdf0cb2609ca999aabb7f62c3bc997c8eaadb19974a3d36f8ff7c17fcf | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | 5.384615 | 4.884615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tcjjmp",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 59643,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is always a bit of "you're the expert, you know better" coming from them. Seeing that this relationship is going to be about methodology and approach more than content, I always want to share more with them but feel like it is not appropriate. Most of our meetings end up being about general questions of methodology, which are beneficial but I also need more specific advice. For example, would it be appropriate to share with them an overview of what I have so far? (X thousand words on this, Y thousand words on that, a list of this, a list of that, an outline of two chapters...) and have them judge my progress more in detail? Or is this not professional enough? \[One supervisor is British and one is American\] | 4cb318fdf0cb2609ca999aabb7f62c3bc997c8eaadb19974a3d36f8ff7c17fcf | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | 5.384615 | 4.384615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tcjjmp",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 61170,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is always a bit of "you're the expert, you know better" coming from them. Seeing that this relationship is going to be about methodology and approach more than content, I always want to share more with them but feel like it is not appropriate. Most of our meetings end up being about general questions of methodology, which are beneficial but I also need more specific advice. For example, would it be appropriate to share with them an overview of what I have so far? (X thousand words on this, Y thousand words on that, a list of this, a list of that, an outline of two chapters...) and have them judge my progress more in detail? Or is this not professional enough? \[One supervisor is British and one is American\] | 4cb318fdf0cb2609ca999aabb7f62c3bc997c8eaadb19974a3d36f8ff7c17fcf | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | 5.384615 | 3.384615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tcjjmp",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 27072,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is always a bit of "you're the expert, you know better" coming from them. Seeing that this relationship is going to be about methodology and approach more than content, I always want to share more with them but feel like it is not appropriate. Most of our meetings end up being about general questions of methodology, which are beneficial but I also need more specific advice. For example, would it be appropriate to share with them an overview of what I have so far? (X thousand words on this, Y thousand words on that, a list of this, a list of that, an outline of two chapters...) and have them judge my progress more in detail? Or is this not professional enough? \[One supervisor is British and one is American\] | 4cb318fdf0cb2609ca999aabb7f62c3bc997c8eaadb19974a3d36f8ff7c17fcf | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | 5.384615 | 3.384615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tcjjmp",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 10980,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is always a bit of "you're the expert, you know better" coming from them. Seeing that this relationship is going to be about methodology and approach more than content, I always want to share more with them but feel like it is not appropriate. Most of our meetings end up being about general questions of methodology, which are beneficial but I also need more specific advice. For example, would it be appropriate to share with them an overview of what I have so far? (X thousand words on this, Y thousand words on that, a list of this, a list of that, an outline of two chapters...) and have them judge my progress more in detail? Or is this not professional enough? \[One supervisor is British and one is American\] | 4cb318fdf0cb2609ca999aabb7f62c3bc997c8eaadb19974a3d36f8ff7c17fcf | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | [
{
"content": "Is there such a thing as sharing too much of your progress with your PhD supervisor? I am doing a PhD in history, currently in second year, and my supervisors are very nice and praiseworthy but somewhat intimidating characters. Nevertheless, they are not specialists in my area and thus there is al... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tcjjmp",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 1527,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, and demoralizing. He has never insulted or yelled at me, but he's always impatient and act like he couldn't care less during our meetings and frequently never let me finish my sentences. A few times he'd checked his phone while I was talking and then realized he should speak when I hadn't spoken for a while. It's like he wasn't even paying attention and just wants to be done and move on. All these have been making me feel like I'm a very low priority on his list and punched a hole in my self-confidence. I have been dreading our weekly meetings and often times needed an hour or two afterwards just to regain any motivation to get back to work. He has a big lab so he's probably overworked meeting with everyone, and to be fair, this project has been dragging for a while now, but we're at the verge of finishing, so maybe he's losing interest and just wants to be done. Even so, I'd expect some level of interest and engagement, professionally-speaking. I was contrasting this with advisors at my previous university, and oh man, the differences are so stark. I always felt like I was listened to and respected and that my advisors genuinely cared about my research. Never had I feel like I was talking to myself all the time when I met with them, or anxiety when meeting time approaches. Just want to vent since this has been on my chest for a while. I'm wondering if others can offer perspective or experience so I can conclude if this advisor is truly a jerk or just displaying "normal behaviors" of PI of a large lab. | f4fd5c8d415862f15b83abb033dc77ec5acf4ab1f21f0c63fd4bb49777f587ce | [
{
"content": "can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, ... | [
{
"content": "can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, ... | [
{
"content": "can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, ... | 5.641026 | 3.307692 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "wmwlen",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2643,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, and demoralizing. He has never insulted or yelled at me, but he's always impatient and act like he couldn't care less during our meetings and frequently never let me finish my sentences. A few times he'd checked his phone while I was talking and then realized he should speak when I hadn't spoken for a while. It's like he wasn't even paying attention and just wants to be done and move on. All these have been making me feel like I'm a very low priority on his list and punched a hole in my self-confidence. I have been dreading our weekly meetings and often times needed an hour or two afterwards just to regain any motivation to get back to work. He has a big lab so he's probably overworked meeting with everyone, and to be fair, this project has been dragging for a while now, but we're at the verge of finishing, so maybe he's losing interest and just wants to be done. Even so, I'd expect some level of interest and engagement, professionally-speaking. I was contrasting this with advisors at my previous university, and oh man, the differences are so stark. I always felt like I was listened to and respected and that my advisors genuinely cared about my research. Never had I feel like I was talking to myself all the time when I met with them, or anxiety when meeting time approaches. Just want to vent since this has been on my chest for a while. I'm wondering if others can offer perspective or experience so I can conclude if this advisor is truly a jerk or just displaying "normal behaviors" of PI of a large lab. | f4fd5c8d415862f15b83abb033dc77ec5acf4ab1f21f0c63fd4bb49777f587ce | [
{
"content": "can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, ... | [
{
"content": "can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, ... | [
{
"content": "can't tell if PI is a bad advisor or not I've been working with my advisor for a few years now, and at the beginning he was great, but I'm recently questioning if he's a bad advisor overall. For the past year or so his communications with me have been increasingly demotivating, negative, curt, ... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "wmwlen",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 11332,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: "Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider while trying for a job?" I can tell you from my personal experience that there have been instances from my life where I have seen people excel so much in their lives. Like one of the people I know (with whom I have studied basically) is being recognized by many people outside of my country. He's doing some pretty amazing business collaborations (UX and stuff, tbh) and I am grinding myself to learn how drug delivery systems work! I don't even know whether people would recognize this in the future or not. It might sound like I am jealous of him. Well, in a way, you would be right! I might be jealous that wonderful things are happening to everyone else other than me. I have been really pushing myself to do some cool stuff and I must say that I have succeeded in some as well (that I am proud of, tbh!) but in real life, it seems I am out of the race and they are far beyond my reach. Is this my guilt of not driving in the right way as him? Or, is it my imposter syndrome that is hindering me to make progress? Have you felt like this is now the stopping point in my life and feel like you are engulfed by total darkness and nothing seems to be okay now! What are your personal experiences? Could you share? How did you find a way to tackle it, if you have any! Would love any advice or hear your story out! | de8145edfc39a49ee7d07cf1ff9ac324827570304cee40cae2a7b0b7209016d9 | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | 6.217949 | 3.417949 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qplqdn",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 2076,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.96
} |
Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: "Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider while trying for a job?" I can tell you from my personal experience that there have been instances from my life where I have seen people excel so much in their lives. Like one of the people I know (with whom I have studied basically) is being recognized by many people outside of my country. He's doing some pretty amazing business collaborations (UX and stuff, tbh) and I am grinding myself to learn how drug delivery systems work! I don't even know whether people would recognize this in the future or not. It might sound like I am jealous of him. Well, in a way, you would be right! I might be jealous that wonderful things are happening to everyone else other than me. I have been really pushing myself to do some cool stuff and I must say that I have succeeded in some as well (that I am proud of, tbh!) but in real life, it seems I am out of the race and they are far beyond my reach. Is this my guilt of not driving in the right way as him? Or, is it my imposter syndrome that is hindering me to make progress? Have you felt like this is now the stopping point in my life and feel like you are engulfed by total darkness and nothing seems to be okay now! What are your personal experiences? Could you share? How did you find a way to tackle it, if you have any! Would love any advice or hear your story out! | de8145edfc39a49ee7d07cf1ff9ac324827570304cee40cae2a7b0b7209016d9 | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | 6.025641 | 3.825641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qplqdn",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 18525,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.96
} |
Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: "Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider while trying for a job?" I can tell you from my personal experience that there have been instances from my life where I have seen people excel so much in their lives. Like one of the people I know (with whom I have studied basically) is being recognized by many people outside of my country. He's doing some pretty amazing business collaborations (UX and stuff, tbh) and I am grinding myself to learn how drug delivery systems work! I don't even know whether people would recognize this in the future or not. It might sound like I am jealous of him. Well, in a way, you would be right! I might be jealous that wonderful things are happening to everyone else other than me. I have been really pushing myself to do some cool stuff and I must say that I have succeeded in some as well (that I am proud of, tbh!) but in real life, it seems I am out of the race and they are far beyond my reach. Is this my guilt of not driving in the right way as him? Or, is it my imposter syndrome that is hindering me to make progress? Have you felt like this is now the stopping point in my life and feel like you are engulfed by total darkness and nothing seems to be okay now! What are your personal experiences? Could you share? How did you find a way to tackle it, if you have any! Would love any advice or hear your story out! | de8145edfc39a49ee7d07cf1ff9ac324827570304cee40cae2a7b0b7209016d9 | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | [
{
"content": "Imposter syndrome or guilt? Has there been any instance in your life where you felt like: \"Okay, my life has come to a halt! People around me are doing crazy amazing jobs and what am I doing? Grinding myself into the whirl of higher knowledge and studies, that someone might not even consider whil... | 6.025641 | 1.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "qplqdn",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 4236,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.96
} |
Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used is not the focus of the paper, just a means to an end and its pretty standard normal stuff. But, I am paralyzed with dread. Is this normal? Also, this is my first publication, in case that info helps! | 3547514541031a6a4b6449369dd3cb5f7357f0be269a1cc36c1cd5fe50dce338 | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | 10 | 3.384615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "d8bm6f",
"raw_score_chosen": 99,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.6153846154,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 67,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.96
} |
Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used is not the focus of the paper, just a means to an end and its pretty standard normal stuff. But, I am paralyzed with dread. Is this normal? Also, this is my first publication, in case that info helps! | 3547514541031a6a4b6449369dd3cb5f7357f0be269a1cc36c1cd5fe50dce338 | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | 6.987179 | 5.602564 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "d8bm6f",
"raw_score_chosen": 31,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.3846153846,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 7692,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.96
} |
Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used is not the focus of the paper, just a means to an end and its pretty standard normal stuff. But, I am paralyzed with dread. Is this normal? Also, this is my first publication, in case that info helps! | 3547514541031a6a4b6449369dd3cb5f7357f0be269a1cc36c1cd5fe50dce338 | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | 6.987179 | 4.112179 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "d8bm6f",
"raw_score_chosen": 31,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.875,
"raw_score_rejected": 8,
"seconds_difference": 6044,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.96
} |
Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used is not the focus of the paper, just a means to an end and its pretty standard normal stuff. But, I am paralyzed with dread. Is this normal? Also, this is my first publication, in case that info helps! | 3547514541031a6a4b6449369dd3cb5f7357f0be269a1cc36c1cd5fe50dce338 | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | [
{
"content": "Imposter Syndrome but manifesting weirdly! I have a manuscript accepted at a thing. I promised to post the code I used in the paper. But now I have a sinking feeling, that when I post it, everybody will pick it apart and tear me apart for not-great/bad coding practices. I mean, the code I used i... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "d8bm6f",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 5625,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.96
} |
The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just think about the post and why i don't deserve it . My only strategy right now is to apply to various multiple positions as much as possible. I hate this uncertainty during the job search. | 6668316701119e66abe69bfaa85208c6d09a5439daac1f2570eaa8dffb7bf658 | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "eo5vps",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 17058,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.92
} |
The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just think about the post and why i don't deserve it . My only strategy right now is to apply to various multiple positions as much as possible. I hate this uncertainty during the job search. | 6668316701119e66abe69bfaa85208c6d09a5439daac1f2570eaa8dffb7bf658 | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "eo5vps",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 14896,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.92
} |
The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just think about the post and why i don't deserve it . My only strategy right now is to apply to various multiple positions as much as possible. I hate this uncertainty during the job search. | 6668316701119e66abe69bfaa85208c6d09a5439daac1f2570eaa8dffb7bf658 | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | [
{
"content": "The imposter syndrome during job search This is my final year in PhD and searching for jobs in industry and academia. I always end up feeling that i am not good enough or not fit for the job, even though i have all the skillset. I dont know what to do.. I often end up with paralysis where i just t... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "eo5vps",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 13208,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.92
} |
Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimental results were cherry-picked and my committee never realized. My advisor wants to re-submit two papers that never got through while I was a student, but I can't seem to bring myself to do new experiments for these papers. Doing these experiments brings back a lot of memories throughout the last 6 years that are tough to deal with. I can't seem to bring myself to work on my PhD line of research at all. The two papers to work on have been rejected several times already: 1 was rejected twice, and the other was rejected three times. I just want to be done with this chapter of my life, but I worry that my advisor will always want to do more. The paper that's been rejected 3 times is a joint paper with another prof and student, and everybody is waiting on me to do more. I'm not sure that I'm emotionally ready to start working on these papers again, and that makes me feel weak, unprofessional, and like a disappointment. Has anyone experienced this lingering imposter syndrome and/or anxiety? Did you ever overcome it? | c804a01ab1e51f1dec6af6fcee07a52a42d6d7c8e3cd4d104e12a1ff383f25b3 | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | 6.346154 | 5.596154 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "cgwp5e",
"raw_score_chosen": 21,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 12,
"seconds_difference": 2504,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimental results were cherry-picked and my committee never realized. My advisor wants to re-submit two papers that never got through while I was a student, but I can't seem to bring myself to do new experiments for these papers. Doing these experiments brings back a lot of memories throughout the last 6 years that are tough to deal with. I can't seem to bring myself to work on my PhD line of research at all. The two papers to work on have been rejected several times already: 1 was rejected twice, and the other was rejected three times. I just want to be done with this chapter of my life, but I worry that my advisor will always want to do more. The paper that's been rejected 3 times is a joint paper with another prof and student, and everybody is waiting on me to do more. I'm not sure that I'm emotionally ready to start working on these papers again, and that makes me feel weak, unprofessional, and like a disappointment. Has anyone experienced this lingering imposter syndrome and/or anxiety? Did you ever overcome it? | c804a01ab1e51f1dec6af6fcee07a52a42d6d7c8e3cd4d104e12a1ff383f25b3 | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | 6.346154 | 4.346154 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "cgwp5e",
"raw_score_chosen": 21,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 7387,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimental results were cherry-picked and my committee never realized. My advisor wants to re-submit two papers that never got through while I was a student, but I can't seem to bring myself to do new experiments for these papers. Doing these experiments brings back a lot of memories throughout the last 6 years that are tough to deal with. I can't seem to bring myself to work on my PhD line of research at all. The two papers to work on have been rejected several times already: 1 was rejected twice, and the other was rejected three times. I just want to be done with this chapter of my life, but I worry that my advisor will always want to do more. The paper that's been rejected 3 times is a joint paper with another prof and student, and everybody is waiting on me to do more. I'm not sure that I'm emotionally ready to start working on these papers again, and that makes me feel weak, unprofessional, and like a disappointment. Has anyone experienced this lingering imposter syndrome and/or anxiety? Did you ever overcome it? | c804a01ab1e51f1dec6af6fcee07a52a42d6d7c8e3cd4d104e12a1ff383f25b3 | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | 5.769231 | 5.054945 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "cgwp5e",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.7142857143,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 4883,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimental results were cherry-picked and my committee never realized. My advisor wants to re-submit two papers that never got through while I was a student, but I can't seem to bring myself to do new experiments for these papers. Doing these experiments brings back a lot of memories throughout the last 6 years that are tough to deal with. I can't seem to bring myself to work on my PhD line of research at all. The two papers to work on have been rejected several times already: 1 was rejected twice, and the other was rejected three times. I just want to be done with this chapter of my life, but I worry that my advisor will always want to do more. The paper that's been rejected 3 times is a joint paper with another prof and student, and everybody is waiting on me to do more. I'm not sure that I'm emotionally ready to start working on these papers again, and that makes me feel weak, unprofessional, and like a disappointment. Has anyone experienced this lingering imposter syndrome and/or anxiety? Did you ever overcome it? | c804a01ab1e51f1dec6af6fcee07a52a42d6d7c8e3cd4d104e12a1ff383f25b3 | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | 5.384615 | 5.184615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "cgwp5e",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 15515,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimental results were cherry-picked and my committee never realized. My advisor wants to re-submit two papers that never got through while I was a student, but I can't seem to bring myself to do new experiments for these papers. Doing these experiments brings back a lot of memories throughout the last 6 years that are tough to deal with. I can't seem to bring myself to work on my PhD line of research at all. The two papers to work on have been rejected several times already: 1 was rejected twice, and the other was rejected three times. I just want to be done with this chapter of my life, but I worry that my advisor will always want to do more. The paper that's been rejected 3 times is a joint paper with another prof and student, and everybody is waiting on me to do more. I'm not sure that I'm emotionally ready to start working on these papers again, and that makes me feel weak, unprofessional, and like a disappointment. Has anyone experienced this lingering imposter syndrome and/or anxiety? Did you ever overcome it? | c804a01ab1e51f1dec6af6fcee07a52a42d6d7c8e3cd4d104e12a1ff383f25b3 | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | 5.384615 | 5.184615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "cgwp5e",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 7865,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimental results were cherry-picked and my committee never realized. My advisor wants to re-submit two papers that never got through while I was a student, but I can't seem to bring myself to do new experiments for these papers. Doing these experiments brings back a lot of memories throughout the last 6 years that are tough to deal with. I can't seem to bring myself to work on my PhD line of research at all. The two papers to work on have been rejected several times already: 1 was rejected twice, and the other was rejected three times. I just want to be done with this chapter of my life, but I worry that my advisor will always want to do more. The paper that's been rejected 3 times is a joint paper with another prof and student, and everybody is waiting on me to do more. I'm not sure that I'm emotionally ready to start working on these papers again, and that makes me feel weak, unprofessional, and like a disappointment. Has anyone experienced this lingering imposter syndrome and/or anxiety? Did you ever overcome it? | c804a01ab1e51f1dec6af6fcee07a52a42d6d7c8e3cd4d104e12a1ff383f25b3 | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | [
{
"content": "Lingering imposter syndrome and anxiety I graduated with my PhD in a STEM field in June, but I am still feeling major imposter syndrome effects. I had a rough time emotionally through my PhD (as most people do) and nearly left twice. I'm not impressed with my work. I feel like some of my experimen... | 5.384615 | 4.384615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "cgwp5e",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 5076,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 103,
"raw_score_ratio": 17.1666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 995,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 8.269231 | 7.144231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 51,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.125,
"raw_score_rejected": 24,
"seconds_difference": 3180,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 8.269231 | 4.169231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 51,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.1,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 3701,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 8.269231 | 0.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 51,
"raw_score_ratio": 8.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 8551,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 6.538462 | 5.138462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 521,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 6.538462 | 3.538462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 5371,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 5.641026 | 4.974359 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 4850,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 5.576923 | 5.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 42490,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 5.576923 | 4.326923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 15124,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a crucial part of the paper's results - it is called out directly in the abstract, results, conclusion, and even the title of the paper. It's not like we wrote out a contract or anything but it was generally understood that I'd be part of this paper. So I do my part and the project goes on for a few years and I check in occasionally while the main author does her thing. Imagine my surprise when, last week, I find the paper published in PNAS without even so much as a mention of my name in either the author list or the acknowledgments! Nevermind that my contribution was one of the headline results or that it took up over a year of my time (and funding, grumble). The paper was led by our collaborators but a professor in my department, who is on my committee, was heavily involved in the paper and was the main connection between us and our collaborators. It's shocking and disappointing that she would somehow neglect to include me in the discussions. To add to the political aspect, somebody else is on the paper who I'm certain did little work - he was an author on our last paper on the same topic but did not do any of the computational modeling work that is being showcased in this new paper... I know for a fact he doesn't know how. I have no idea how that could be but it looks like he was just thrown on the authorship list for some reason. Needless to say, I'm quite frustrated. But now I'm not sure what to do. Way after the fact, she wrote me an uncharacteristically friendly email showing the paper was published and privately acknowledging my contribution (but not apologizing...), maybe meant to just make me feel better? She downplayed how much I would have benefited from the authorship but that, frankly, seems insane to me. I don't feel like I have power in this situation but I feel I was severely exploited. Is there a way to post-hoc edit the authorship list somehow...? How do I prevent this from happening again? Any similar stories from others here? | 19843cf5a25fc6e2b71d2a7f858e43eecb9678604d85644366a02f9715c43969 | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | [
{
"content": "Left off of author list I'm a late stage PhD candidate with a bit of a conundrum... I'd spent about 1.5 years developing and implementing an important model run for a paper with some collaborators. My part was done relatively quickly compared to the rest of the paper, but it alone ended up being a... | 5.384615 | 4.884615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8y0m22",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 38857,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 1
} |
Can you publish a paper excluding one of the authors? I have completed an internship and the paper is due to be published. It was between myself, another intern and a supervisor. However, the supervisor and the intern are still in touch and it appears that she took credit for the work I have done. The supervisor is also saying the research is her “own”. I have not received any updates regarding the paper or the publications, yet they are still in touch. I’m afraid they will get rid off my name when submitting the paper for publication. What can I do? Is there anything that would be good to prepare (save or obtain) in case they will actually remove my name? Are there any organisations that could support me? I still have messages from them, where we were discussing the work and the draft of the paper saved. They deleted the website where we listed who did what (however I doubt this has ever been checked in advance since specific graphs I created, the supervisor later said it was the other girl who did them) | 9e4fd5fb204c46114845c8f3600b11cc1691f3e26b6ec8ad95b416c9e648d92d | [
{
"content": "Can you publish a paper excluding one of the authors? I have completed an internship and the paper is due to be published. It was between myself, another intern and a supervisor. However, the supervisor and the intern are still in touch and it appears that she took credit for the work I have done... | [
{
"content": "Can you publish a paper excluding one of the authors? I have completed an internship and the paper is due to be published. It was between myself, another intern and a supervisor. However, the supervisor and the intern are still in touch and it appears that she took credit for the work I have done... | [
{
"content": "Can you publish a paper excluding one of the authors? I have completed an internship and the paper is due to be published. It was between myself, another intern and a supervisor. However, the supervisor and the intern are still in touch and it appears that she took credit for the work I have done... | 5.448718 | 5.048718 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ze6evk",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 13668,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 10 | 9.897959 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 108,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1020408163,
"raw_score_rejected": 98,
"seconds_difference": 5730,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 10 | 9.229508 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 108,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.7704918033,
"raw_score_rejected": 61,
"seconds_difference": 5471,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 10 | 2.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 108,
"raw_score_ratio": 8.3076923077,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 5542,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 8.910256 | 5.217949 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 61,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.6923076923,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 71,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 6.217949 | 6.100302 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1176470588,
"raw_score_rejected": 17,
"seconds_difference": 8052,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 6.089744 | 5.782051 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 17,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3076923077,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 7824,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 6.089744 | 2.839744 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 17,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 49,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 6.217949 | 5.75641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.4615384615,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 15876,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 6.217949 | 5.317949 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.9,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 5041,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 6.217949 | 2.467949 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 8101,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some reason, every group before us has presented a PowerPoint and organized their “lesson” by author/article without synthesizing the key concepts of ALL the readings and teaching a comprehensive lesson based on the major points the authors are making through the texts. They have basically been going slide by slide saying “author x said this and this is what he meant by that. Author y said this, and this is what he meant by that”. This is not how I understood the assignment to be completed, and our professor has had to come back behind each group to connect the pieces of information together and reteach the class. Our group met last week and I explained to them that I did not want to be like the previous groups before us and that I wanted to actually meet the expectations set out by our professor. They all seemed passionate and excited about the assignment, however one of the group members sent us a PowerPoint 2 weeks before any of us had even met with it organized exactly how the previous groups had theirs organized. I explained during the meeting my opinion of how I believe the professor wants a conceptual, comprehensive lesson as opposed to independent summaries of the articles. I don’t think she understood what I was trying to say, but our other group member eventually caught on and agreed. She admitted to not doing so well on the weekly essays we’re assigned and our other group member admitted to scoring C’s on her last few. I kept quiet during this conversation because I haven’t received a grade lower than a 93 on anything I’ve turned in, and didn’t want to be off putting. But after going back and forth for awhile trying to explain it to her, we agreed to read the readings independently and then reconvene next week. Last night she sends me the “updated” PowerPoint via email asking if I can fill in the last two slides. Nothing changed regarding its organization so I don’t email back and opt to discuss today at tonight’s meeting. A few minutes ago, she texts the group chat asking again if I could have the authors organized by year by Tuesday. I’m annoyed and at a loss on how to proceed. Do I just cave and risk taking a lower grade for the sake of maintaining the peace? | 825c04492d0429c15a23e94820af008fe57032902a2d3ad7b0d9aeb94d168fdc | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | [
{
"content": "I [24F] cannot come to an agreement with my group members for a grad school group project Our assignment is to pretty much lead the class/discussion for the week. We’re basically the professors for the course material that week. Each week, we’re assigned 4-5 scholarly articles to read. For some re... | 5.641026 | 4.141026 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xmb0jv",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 3060,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.