Datasets:
willtheorangeguy
/
2018-WAN-Show-Transcripts

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
text
stringlengths
14
502
[2418.02 --> 2418.14] Okay.
[2418.14 --> 2418.92] Let's say 2021.
[2419.54 --> 2422.82] It's because like it could be three years before they release a follow up.
[2422.88 --> 2423.24] I don't know.
[2423.24 --> 2424.04] The way things are going.
[2425.46 --> 2425.98] So.
[2426.32 --> 2427.86] That's kind of true, actually.
[2428.00 --> 2432.56] So there's actual dedicated silicon in the chip for RTX.
[2433.02 --> 2433.18] Yeah.
[2433.22 --> 2436.84] But they know that this feature doesn't add value for a lot of their customers.
[2437.26 --> 2441.78] So I was looking at it going, okay, they went straight from 10 to 20.
[2442.24 --> 2445.50] They've got this feature that costs them real money.
[2445.94 --> 2449.36] Actually costs them money that they actually have to charge you for.
[2449.64 --> 2451.58] I mean, they don't have to, but they're not a charity.
[2451.58 --> 2454.06] Um, so it actually costs you money.
[2454.06 --> 2458.96] And for a lot of people doesn't deliver tangible value.
[2458.96 --> 2463.60] Especially as you come down from the upper tier of cards into the lower ones.
[2463.92 --> 2465.66] So this makes sense now.
[2466.50 --> 2470.72] Rumors are circulating that NVIDIA is set to launch, this is posted by Robin M on the forum,
[2471.34 --> 2480.08] a GeForce RTX 2060 and a GT and a GTX 1160 in mid-January.
[2480.08 --> 2482.46] Some say it will actually be an 1160 Ti.
[2482.72 --> 2486.54] So these new cards would be Turing GPUs, but different variants.
[2486.64 --> 2488.20] So there will be a TU-106.
[2488.32 --> 2489.16] That's the 2060.
[2489.40 --> 2491.46] And a TU-116.
[2491.84 --> 2493.56] And that is the GTX.
[2493.70 --> 2496.16] So that's with all the RTX features cut out.
[2496.40 --> 2502.76] So it would have the Turing shaders instead of ray tracing, which will remain exclusive to RTX models.
[2502.76 --> 2511.14] There is rumored to be no RTX 2050, which would mean that these mid-range and entry-level parts would be GeForce 11 only.
[2511.34 --> 2512.76] So I would fully...
[2513.42 --> 2514.02] Okay, no.
[2514.22 --> 2514.84] What do you think?
[2515.22 --> 2517.68] So will they go as far as then?
[2517.98 --> 2519.44] So will they keep them segmented?
[2519.68 --> 2520.30] If you want...
[2520.30 --> 2521.80] If you're a high-end gamer, whatever.
[2522.02 --> 2522.70] You pay for RTX.
[2522.82 --> 2526.80] You want that ray tracing stuff in your Battlefield V and other games, theoretically, at some point.
[2526.80 --> 2531.60] And then if you're a low-end gamer, well, honestly, the hardware wasn't going to run it anyway.
[2531.76 --> 2532.36] So get rekt.
[2532.44 --> 2533.48] You can just not run RTX.
[2533.84 --> 2533.94] Yeah.
[2534.12 --> 2542.24] Or do you think that they will actually offer a value-performance GTX option like an 1180 or something like that?
[2542.40 --> 2543.58] I don't think they're going to.
[2544.14 --> 2546.36] And I really wish they did this whole thing differently.
[2546.68 --> 2546.96] Both.
[2547.10 --> 2547.72] I will say both.
[2547.80 --> 2548.04] Okay.
[2548.14 --> 2549.96] I would like to hear both of these stories.
[2550.08 --> 2552.28] So I don't think they're going to go back up, necessarily.
[2553.00 --> 2553.56] No, I'm just kidding.
[2553.62 --> 2554.06] I am listening.
[2554.40 --> 2554.76] Wow.
[2555.18 --> 2556.06] It was a sponsor spot.
[2556.06 --> 2557.40] I was dealing with a flow plane problem.
[2558.44 --> 2564.94] So I don't think they're going to go back up, for one, because I do think they want to keep their high-end prices.
[2565.06 --> 2565.32] Sorry.
[2565.48 --> 2566.08] I'm listening.
[2566.48 --> 2570.38] I do think they want to keep their high-end prices as, like, one kind of product.
[2570.50 --> 2572.10] They want to have their one premier product.
[2572.36 --> 2576.74] You don't want to have, like, oh, you don't like ray tracing, which we want to focus on, but you want a maximum experience.
[2576.76 --> 2581.76] So we can have, like, RTX and, like, GTX and, like, I don't know, LTX, like, Lite.
[2582.18 --> 2583.64] Lite TX or something.
[2583.96 --> 2584.92] Oh, no, I wasn't even thinking.
[2585.12 --> 2585.74] Oh, right.
[2586.06 --> 2586.50] Oh.
[2588.44 --> 2588.76] Oh.
[2589.18 --> 2590.10] Don't let me forget.
[2590.24 --> 2590.84] We have more news about that.
[2590.84 --> 2591.64] We have big LTX news.
[2591.80 --> 2591.86] Yeah.
[2591.86 --> 2591.88] Yeah.
[2591.88 --> 2592.06] Okay.
[2592.16 --> 2592.38] Go ahead.
[2592.44 --> 2592.98] No, I'm on it.
[2592.98 --> 2600.06] I think what they should have done is kept the 2000-whatever because people don't like number variants.
[2600.30 --> 2601.74] That gets people really confused.
[2601.96 --> 2602.14] Sure.
[2602.16 --> 2602.66] And that's okay.
[2602.94 --> 2605.90] I think they just, as you get on the stack, should have switched to GTX.
[2607.16 --> 2607.84] Oh, okay.
[2607.84 --> 2609.52] Interesting.
[2609.52 --> 2609.56] Interesting.
[2609.56 --> 2611.36] But then what if they wanted...
[2611.36 --> 2611.98] Or, like, TTX.
[2611.98 --> 2617.00] What if they wanted to have, like, 1160 and 2060?
[2617.42 --> 2622.38] Like, where they're both a 60 variant, but just with and without a feature.
[2623.12 --> 2626.52] Because suffixes used to be a thing.
[2626.52 --> 2627.86] Like, what about a suffix?
[2628.22 --> 2628.80] Or that.
[2628.96 --> 2629.14] Yeah.
[2629.52 --> 2632.88] Like, I hate that it's RTX now.
[2632.94 --> 2634.80] I've screwed that up a handful of times already.
[2634.90 --> 2636.96] But you could have a GTX 2060.
[2636.96 --> 2637.48] 2080R.
[2637.52 --> 2640.72] And you could have a RTX 2060.
[2640.72 --> 2644.60] You could have two 2060s and just have GTX RTX.
[2644.70 --> 2645.78] See, I hate the suffix.
[2645.88 --> 2646.82] Or I hate the prefix.
[2647.24 --> 2649.24] I'd rather have a suffix, personally.