text
stringlengths
0
2.46k
[5068.86 --> 5069.36] I love Ruby.
[5069.44 --> 5069.94] I love Python.
[5070.08 --> 5070.30] I don't.
[5070.42 --> 5070.80] I'm just.
[5071.10 --> 5071.26] Yeah.
[5071.48 --> 5071.62] Yeah.
[5071.80 --> 5075.18] Nobody's poopooing on those communities, but there's just a lot of poopooing on Node, which
[5075.18 --> 5075.90] I don't like.
[5075.92 --> 5076.30] Yeah.
[5076.50 --> 5080.50] I'm, you know, you can do the same thing with those languages, by the way.
[5080.58 --> 5084.76] You can run event based computation on Ruby and Python.
[5084.90 --> 5085.62] It doesn't matter.
[5085.80 --> 5086.00] OK.
[5086.36 --> 5087.24] It's the same logic.
[5087.38 --> 5087.56] OK.
[5087.62 --> 5092.12] So you have languages that are capable of running multiple requests.
[5092.20 --> 5095.68] A lot of them, actually thousands on the same process.
[5095.68 --> 5100.54] Most of our apps literally take some data from a database and send it out.
[5100.86 --> 5100.92] OK.
[5100.92 --> 5105.54] So when one database query is running, I can definitely send another one down the line
[5105.54 --> 5110.18] because I'm not, you know, my CPU and memory are basically idling there.
[5110.56 --> 5110.64] OK.
[5111.24 --> 5116.42] Now, so Node.js made a huge splash because it was asynchronous and it was able to handle
[5116.42 --> 5119.90] thousands of concurrent requests from a single tiny node process.
[5120.06 --> 5124.76] Even a tiny Raspberry Pi can run hundreds of concurrent requests on most things.
[5124.76 --> 5125.08] OK.
[5125.94 --> 5132.08] Now, AWS convinced everybody that running more than one request at a time per process was
[5132.08 --> 5132.56] wrong.
[5133.40 --> 5138.46] And, you know, they have you pay per second even when that CPU is idle.
[5139.26 --> 5140.50] This is AWS Lambda.
[5141.12 --> 5146.18] So if you use AWS Lambda, you are paying even if your CPU is literally doing nothing.
[5146.18 --> 5155.30] And everybody is believing in this massive lie, essentially, that that is a better model.
[5155.90 --> 5157.20] It's better for them.
[5157.86 --> 5158.02] OK.
[5158.34 --> 5160.56] It's, you know, you need to know the tradeoffs.
[5160.72 --> 5165.12] Lambdas are great at low volume because they scale to zero and start very fast in genetic
[5165.12 --> 5166.36] scheme of thing.
[5166.92 --> 5170.52] Try running a lot of Lambdas and then check your AWS bill.
[5170.52 --> 5176.74] So, OK, this is going to be, you're going to be hit pretty heavily down if you have a
[5176.74 --> 5181.98] lot of Lambda calls because, or even worse, you know that there is a massive amount of
[5181.98 --> 5185.52] limit of how many Lambdas you can spawn on a single AWS account.
[5186.02 --> 5187.24] I don't know if you know this, but.
[5187.42 --> 5188.38] Oh, I didn't know that.
[5188.46 --> 5188.92] Oh, wow.
[5189.06 --> 5191.10] How many can you have simultaneously spun up?
[5191.10 --> 5193.08] I think by default is, I think, 256.
[5194.00 --> 5198.76] So at maximum, you can handle 256 concurrent requests on the default account.
[5199.38 --> 5200.10] You need to raise it.
[5200.10 --> 5201.00] That's not, that's not great.
[5201.16 --> 5201.38] Yeah.
[5201.62 --> 5202.20] Oh, wow.
[5202.48 --> 5206.26] And if you run out, OK, then they start getting queued.
[5206.92 --> 5207.32] Wow.
[5207.84 --> 5210.94] And in the same time, you can, you know, oh, wait a sec.
[5210.98 --> 5213.50] I can spawn 10,000 Lambdas.
[5213.72 --> 5214.04] OK.
[5214.78 --> 5215.32] Wait a second.
[5215.46 --> 5222.86] I can run 10,000 concurrent requests on a single machine on Fargate and it's significantly
[5222.86 --> 5223.94] better performant.
[5223.94 --> 5227.90] And, but very interesting, they don't ship scale to zero on Fargate.
[5227.90 --> 5228.74] Sorry.
[5228.96 --> 5234.92] You know, I'm just calling out the AWS bad market strategy to, to sabotage the industry,
[5234.92 --> 5237.36] but that's the, to make more money, which is great for them.
[5237.36 --> 5244.24] Well, to just remind everybody, youtube.com slash changelog.
[5244.74 --> 5245.02] Yes.
[5245.24 --> 5246.92] Videos, shorts, clips.
[5247.40 --> 5247.72] Mm-hmm.
[5247.82 --> 5249.94] We now have the podcasts tab there.
[5250.00 --> 5251.12] I'm not sure what's going on there.
[5251.12 --> 5252.80] What's happening with the podcast tabs?
[5252.96 --> 5253.64] How's this work?
[5253.64 --> 5259.22] They like halfway adopted podcasts and they think a few of our playlists are podcasts,
[5259.22 --> 5261.82] even though they're not, they're clips from podcasts.
[5262.28 --> 5263.62] So it's just a hot mess.
[5263.94 --> 5265.22] And that tab, I just would ignore it.
[5265.22 --> 5268.78] I don't think anybody knows that tab exists because that's how YouTube rolls.
[5268.92 --> 5271.70] You know, they roll out features and they don't do anything else with them.
[5272.44 --> 5276.54] The occasional poll, which is good, like backslashes for or against.
[5276.78 --> 5277.04] Yeah.
[5277.10 --> 5279.28] We'll, we'll do our unpop polls there every once in a while.
[5279.28 --> 5284.18] So, but a good place to consume if you just want clips, if you're just, if you're overwhelmed
[5284.18 --> 5287.36] with the feed and you're like, man, I want to unsubscribe, not because I hate it, because
[5287.36 --> 5288.28] I just can't keep up.
[5288.76 --> 5289.00] Mm-hmm.
[5289.06 --> 5289.66] Check out YouTube.
[5290.06 --> 5290.86] Keep up on the small.
[5291.52 --> 5291.88] Okay.
[5291.96 --> 5293.88] Here comes Skalk's BMC remix.
[5294.44 --> 5297.48] So it's super hard, but I'm going to give it a try.
[5297.48 --> 5299.54] I'll start with.
[5303.92 --> 5307.18] That was pretty darn sweet.
[5307.18 --> 5316.66] And then just a couple of quick ones.
[5319.66 --> 5325.46] And then practice.
[5326.40 --> 5328.14] That was pretty cool.
[5328.64 --> 5330.78] Last, but certainly not least.
[5330.86 --> 5333.32] It is Tillman Jex.
[5333.64 --> 5334.74] Hello, everyone.
[5335.02 --> 5336.72] Thank you for another excellent year.
[5336.72 --> 5344.80] I would give my favorite episodes as Story Time with Steve Yeager, Pushing Back on Unconstrained
[5344.80 --> 5347.04] Capitalism, which was with Cory Doctorow.