original_problem stringlengths 162 931 | original_solution stringclasses 6
values | augmented_problem stringlengths 281 1.35k | augmented_solution stringclasses 68
values | distractor_metadata dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Nuclear weapons give states valuable agenda-setting power on the international stage.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B)... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Nuclear weapons give states valuable agenda-setting power on the international stage.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B)... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical inference question was fused into the main political evaluation task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct sub-problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Countries with nuclear weapons have the ability to set their own agenda. Question: Does the perspective support or ... | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Countries with nuclear weapons have the ability to set their own agenda. Question: Does the perspective support or ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-question about UN peacekeeping influence is fused into the original task, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid mixing evidence between them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: States with nuclear weapons are afforded more authority to set agendas at international levels.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: if the perspective could possibly convi... | support | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: States with nuclear weapons are afforded more authority to set agendas at international levels.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: if the perspective could possibly convi... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a simple fractional calculation about representatives) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating the arithmetic with the argumentative judgement.",
"name": "Compositional ... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: All countries have a right to defend themselves with nuclear weapons, even when they lack the capacity in conventional weapons.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support o... | support | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: All countries have a right to defend themselves with nuclear weapons, even when they lack the capacity in conventional weapons.
Separately (unrelated to the judgment below), as a quick compositional check: a poll shows 70% o... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic subtask (averaging poll percentages) was fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the unrelated computation from the core judgement about whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.",
"name": "Composi... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear def... | A | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear def... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (about whether 'state' and 'country' are strictly synonymous) was fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the side question affect the main judgement.",
"name": "Compositional und... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: To use nuclear weapons in defense of the nation is lawful for all countries. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: To use nuclear weapons in defense of the nation is lawful for all countries. Additionally, independently classify whether the perspective is primarily a nor... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, related sub-question (classify the perspective as normative or descriptive/legal) is fused into the original task so the solver must separate the two problems and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
]... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: countries have to right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapon. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? | support | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: countries have to right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapon. Separately, as an independent editorial task, identify any grammatical or typographical errors in the perspec... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent editorial subtask (identify and correct grammatical/typographical errors) was fused into the main semantic classification problem, requiring the solver to separate and handle two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: all countries are entitled to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they do not have the capacity to carry conventional weapons.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single wo... | support | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: all countries are entitled to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they do not have the capacity to carry conventional weapons.
Separate task (independent): Classify the following sentence as 'normative' or 'descript... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task (normative vs descriptive) was fused into the main claim-support decision, requiring the solver to separate and solve two independent tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Possessing nuclear weapons will be counter to the peaceful interests of states.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Possessing nuclear weapons will be counter to the peaceful interests of states.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classifying the perspective as empirical vs. normative) is fused into the original question so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, and unrelated to the judgment above, if Country A's defense budget rose from $120 billion to $138... | undermine; 15% | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numeric sub-problem about defense budget percentage change is fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and solve both independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: It's conceivable that the wrong people will have the weapons.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) supports
(B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: It's conceivable that the wrong people will have the weapons.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Separate side-task (independent of the main question): Cla... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent side-task (classification of the perspective as empirical vs moral) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the main evaluation (support vs undermine) from the unrelated sub-question.",
"name": "Compositional understa... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: The nukes can end up being used against us. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: The nukes can end up being used against us. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Also, as a separate task (to be treated independently), classify whether the perspective exemplifies consequenti... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (ethical-classification) is fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two distinct items.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate —... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Terrorists will steal nuclear weapons from poorly guarded arsenals. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Terrorists will steal nuclear weapons from poorly guarded arsenals. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) supports (B) undermines
As a separate, independent sub-problem (do not let this change your answer... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (about whether strong safeguards negate the theft-based objection) into the main prompt so the solver must separate the two questions and not let the added scenario alter the verdict on the original claim.",
"name": "Compo... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: [Iran specific] Iran has threatened to destroy Israel.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
Solution: B | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: [Iran specific] Iran has threatened to destroy Israel.
Question 1: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
Question 2 (separate): Based solely on the single sentence 'Iran has th... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-question is appended, forcing the solver to separate two tasks (evaluating support/undermining vs. classifying the nature of the sentence) and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"e... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Iran has Israel targeted. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. Options: (A) Support (B) Undermine (C) Neutral (D) Both support and undermine (E) Insufficient informa... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Iran has Israel targeted. Also, as a separate sub-question, state whether the perspective statement ('Iran has Israel targeted') is best read as a factual claim, a stated threat, or an opinion — treat that classific... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as fact/threat/opinion) is fused into the original task, forcing the solver to separate two reasoning threads and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_d... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective und... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective und... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical sub-problem (a syllogism validity question) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and answer the political support question independently from the unrelated logic question.",
"name": "Compos... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: The United States has an obligation to protect international stability due to its unique military strength.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or u... | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: The United States has an obligation to protect international stability due to its unique military strength.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or u... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent additional question about unilateral vs. multilateral action is fused into the prompt so a solver must separate the main classification (support/undermine) from the appended sub-problem.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: The US must protect the international community.
Instruction: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different vi... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: The US must protect the international community.
Instruction: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different vi... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask is fused into the original instruction, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks (the original support/undermine judgment and a fact/opinion classification) independently.",
"name": "Compositional understand... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Supporting means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Pe... | B | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Supporting means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Pe... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task was fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two different problems (support/undermine decision and fact/opinion classification).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective (Iran-specific): Others, particularly Israel, would act if the United States did not. Determine whether this perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Solution: undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective (Iran-specific): Others, particularly Israel, would act if the United States did not. Determine whether this perspective supports or undermines the claim. Additionally (separate task): classify whether the perspectiv... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-problem (empirical vs. normative) was fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two different types of questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diff... |
Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: If the US does not act on Iran, Israel will. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is ... | undermine | Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: If the US does not act on Iran, Israel will. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent labeling subtask (classify the sentence as prediction/threat/causal/other) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_d... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Nuclear waste disposal is rarely safe/efficient; it is too much to expect a sqeaky clean disposal/disarmament of nuclear weapons.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the ... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Nuclear waste disposal is rarely safe/efficient; it is too much to expect a sqeaky clean disposal/disarmament of nuclear weapons. (Separate note: if dismantling 10 warheads produces 25 tonnes of nuclear waste, how m... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about waste tonnage per number of dismantled warheads is fused into the main argumentative task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficul... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Disarmament is impossible, rendering efforts to disarm pointless and simply wasteful.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Options: (A) support (B) undermine
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Disarmament is impossible, rendering efforts to disarm pointless and simply wasteful.
At the end of the debate the moderators also mentioned an unrelated logical example for discussion: "All mammals are animals. All... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical sub-problem (a simple syllogism validity question) was fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the unrelated exercise from the main political reasoning question.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: The abolition of nuclear weapons would actually incentivize the development and use of even more dangerous weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A... | A | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: The abolition of nuclear weapons would actually incentivize the development and use of even more dangerous weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (a simple two-step percentage reduction question) was fused into the original political evaluation question to force the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it supports; otherwise it undermines. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Pro... | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it supports; otherwise it undermines. Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence. Perspective: Pro... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical sub-question is fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and ignore the unrelated sub-problem when producing the single-word support/undermine answer.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: States will give terrorists nuclear weapons.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Neutral or insufficient information
Solution: B | B | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: States will give terrorists nuclear weapons.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Neutral or insufficient information
Secondary (independent) ques... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question about a related nuclear-policy topic is fused into the original item, requiring the solver to separate and evaluate two claims independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Irrational leaders make the possession of nuclear weapons dangerous.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: Irrational leaders make the possession of nuclear weapons dangerous.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Independent mini-debate (separate sub-proble... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, self-contained sub-problem (about solar adoption and GDP) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate two distinct reasoning tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimate... |
Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: It is immoral to use the threat of nuclear annihilation in order to achieve foreign policy aims.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Support
(B) Undermine | B | Statement: Claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
Perspective: It is immoral to use the threat of nuclear annihilation in order to achieve foreign policy aims.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
[Separate exercise... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, thematically related sub-question is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate two parallel judgment tasks and avoid conflating their reasoning.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals." Perspective: "Too many innocents killed". If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, label supporting; otherwise label undermining. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals." Perspective: "Too many innocents killed". If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, label supporting; otherwise label undermining. S... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-task (a grammaticality judgment) is fused into the original semantic labeling problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the additional judgment interfere with the main label.",
"name": "Compositional unde... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Many innocents have been killed because of the death penalty. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim | B | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Many innocents have been killed because of the death penalty. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim. Additionally, as a sepa... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (sentiment classification) is fused into the original inference task, requiring the solver to separate and handle two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_inc... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty has led to innocent people dying.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Solution: B | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty has led to innocent people dying.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Also, as a separate and independent sub-question ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the original reasoning task so a model must separate the two tasks and avoid letting the unrelated calculation affect the entailment judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estim... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Can be reserved for the worst of the worst. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Can be reserved for the worst of the worst. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. (Separately — as an independent subtask that should not change your main judgment — indicate whether the phra... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classifying the phrase 'worst of the worst' as categorical vs. relative) is fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the secondary judgment affect the main support/undermine decision.",
... |
Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty should be used for the worst cases. If the perspective could possibly convince someone wit... | support | Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty should be used for the worst cases. Also, as a separate sub-problem included in the same p... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem ('7 * 8 = 56?') is fused into the main labeling task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": ... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty is saved for the most horrible criminals.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option (A)-(J).
Options: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Neutral or... | A | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty is saved for the most horrible criminals.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option (A)-(J).
Options: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Neutral or... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, secondary yes/no sub-question was fused into the main prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks (the main A–J evaluation and the unrelated word-presence check).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficu... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, related sub-problem is fused into the main problem so a solver must separate the tasks and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — likely to confuse mid-t... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty should be used if someone commits first-degree murder. They would receive the same treatment that they gave. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support... | support | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty should be used if someone commits first-degree murder. They would receive the same treatment that they gave. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical-evaluation sub-problem (a syllogism validity check) was fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the additional inference affect the main support/undermine decision.",
"name":... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty should apply as punishment for first-degree murder; an eye for an eye. Question: Does the perspec... | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty should apply as punishment for first-degree murder; an eye for an eye. Question: Does the perspec... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (identify the moral theory: retributive vs utilitarian) is fused into the same prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the added classification change the support/undermine decision.",
"name... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Killers must die to satisfy society.
Solution: support | support | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Killers must die to satisfy society. (Unrelated check: separately, compute the sum of the first three prime numbers greater than 20.)
... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (sum of three primes) is fused into the classification task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — likely ... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: "We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals." Perspective: "There are more efficient policies than death penalty" Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: "We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals." Perspective: "There are more efficient policies than death penalty" Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. (A) supports (B) undermines. Separately (independently of the above), as an additional ... | B; C | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent annotation task (classify the perspective as empirical vs. moral) was fused into the original judgement task so a solver must separate the two sub-problems and answer each independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Other policies are more efficient than using the death penalty. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone ... | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Other policies are more efficient than using the death penalty. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (another claim/perspective pair) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and solve them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — the adde... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. A perspective that could possibly convince someone with a different view is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty is not an efficien... | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. A perspective that could possibly convince someone with a different view is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty is not an efficien... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent subtask (identifying whether the perspective concerns efficiency or morality) into the main classification problem, requiring the solver to separate and handle two judgments independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: we are increasing the hate inside terrorist organizations and the dead person will be seen as a hero that animates their fight. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either suppor... | undermine | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: we are increasing the hate inside terrorist organizations and the dead person will be seen as a hero that animates their fight. As a separate subtask, without letting it affect the main judgment, also identify which rheto... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent subtask (classify the rhetorical tactic) was fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the tasks (rhetorical classification vs. support/undermine judgment) and not let the extra task change the core decision.",
"name": "Com... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: It is dangerous to impose the death penalty because the dead person would be seen as a hero to their terrorist organization. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: It is dangerous to impose the death penalty because the dead person would be seen as a hero to their terrorist organization. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Aside from evaluating this a... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (compute 13 * 7) is fused into the original reasoning task so the solver must separate and solve two unrelated tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — t... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty for terrorists causes their organizations to hate more and to idolize their dead.
Solution: undermine | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty for terrorists causes their organizations to hate more and to idolize their dead. Separately (as an independent sub-problem), classify ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs. value-based) is fused into the original task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficult... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Execution helps alleviate the overcrowding of prisons. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherw... | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Execution helps alleviate the overcrowding of prisons. Additionally, as a separate and independent sub-question (which should be solved separately and mu... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (prime check) is fused into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid contaminating the main judgment with the unrelated calculation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: We could make more room in the prison with execution punishment. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim | A | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: We could make more room in the prison with execution punishment. Additionally, suppose a state currently has 10,000 inmates and carries out 100 executions in a year while admitting no new inmates — what is the percentage ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (percentage decrease) is fused into the main rhetorical judgment task, forcing the solver to separate tasks and avoid conflating the numeric computation with the support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Compositional un... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The solution to the overcrowding in prisons is execution.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The solution to the overcrowding in prisons is execution.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine.
[Separate independent exercise — compositiona... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent claim/perspective pair was added so the solver must separate two similar sub-problems and avoid conflating their relations.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — likely to confuse ... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice.
Answer choices: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice.
Answer choices: (A) supports (B) undermines
... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (identifying active vs. passive voice) is fused into the original task so the solver must separate and solve two different problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate... |
Statement: Determine whether the given perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty is too absolute and too irreversible. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the given perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty is too absolute and too irreversible. Also, as an unrelated short exercise, determine whether 221 is a prime number. Answer with ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent short math sub-problem (primality of 221) is fused into the main task so the solver must separate the two tasks and focus on the original classification question.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_in... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty is not justice.
Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty is not justice.
As an unrelated compositional check (do not include this in your final single-word answer), consider the syllogism: "All A are B; Some B are C; therefore some A are C." Decide f... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical-syllogism sub-problem is fused into the main question as an aside, forcing the solver to separate two tasks (moral stance classification and syllogistic validity) and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Task: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words support or undermine.
Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty is a financial burden on the state. | undermine | Statement: Task: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words support or undermine.
Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty is a financial burden on the state. For dataset quality co... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (17 + 26) was fused into the main classification task so the solver must separate the unrelated computation from the perspective classification.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficul... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The expense of the death penalty financial hardship on the state. Using the rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherw... | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The expense of the death penalty financial hardship on the state. Using the rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherw... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, separate evaluation task is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two problems and not let the added task affect the original judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_inc... |
Statement: Determine whether the given perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: It's a financial loss to the state enforcing the death penalty. Respond with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the given perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: It's a financial loss to the state enforcing the death penalty. Additionally, as a separate mini-task (independent of your evaluation above), compu... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent numerical sub-problem about litigation/incarceration costs into the main evaluation task, requiring the solver to separate an unrelated arithmetic calculation from the rhetorical judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}... |
Statement: Given the following claim and perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Crime can be prevented by threatening the death penalty. | support | Statement: Given the following claim and perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: Crime can be prevented by threatening the death penalty. Separately (unrelated exercise): determine whether the f... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical entailment sub-problem was fused into the original judgment task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not confuse them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the e... |
Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty acts as a deterrent to crime.
Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The death penalty acts as a deterrent to crime.
Separately, and as an independent micro-task, classify the foll... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify a separate sentence as fact or opinion) was fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated task affect the main support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Compositional unde... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: With the death penalty in place, crime is deterred.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: With the death penalty in place, crime is deterred.
Separately, as an independent sub-problem, classify the perspective as an empirical claim or a moral assertion (you do not need to provide that classification in your fi... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-problem (empirical vs. moral) was fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid answering the irrelevant sub-question when giving the single-word response.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty deters crime. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | A | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The death penalty deters crime. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines. Separately, consider this independent perspective: Some studies argue the death penalty is sign... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (about cost) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the two perspectives and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate; the mod... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: Execution prevents the accused from committing further crimes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with either support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: Execution prevents the accused from committing further crimes.
As a separate subtask, classify this perspective as primarily an argument about deterrence or about incapacitation (answer with either deterrence or incapacit... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (deterrence vs incapacitation) was fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the extra classification alter the main support/undermine judgement.",
"name": "Compositional... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: State-sanctioned killing is wrong.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: State-sanctioned killing is wrong.
Independent sub-problem (separate/compositional): Which ethical theory best fits the perspective "State-sanctioned killing is wrong"? Choose one option independently of the main... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem about classifying the ethical theory is fused into the original item, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moder... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: It's wrong to have the state enforce killing. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one word: support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: It's wrong to have the state enforce killing. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one word: support or undermine. As an independ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (primality of 29) was fused into the original political judgment task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two distinct questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_inc... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The sanctioning of the State to kill is just immoral. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals. Perspective: The sanctioning of the State to kill is just immoral. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Additionally, as a separate task, indicate whether the perspective is best characterized as a deont... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the moral theory behind the perspective) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate two distinct inferences: (1) relation between perspective and claim, and (2) classification of argument type.",
... |
Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned. Perspective: Unmanned salons are legal, yet deadly. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim | A | Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned. Perspective: Unmanned salons are legal, yet deadly. As a separate aside in the same report, it mentions that in a district with 20 salons, 5 were reported as unmanned; if each unmanned salon had 3 sunbeds, how many sunbeds were in unmanned salons? Question: Does the perspecti... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about numbers of unmanned salons/sunbeds is fused into the main prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks (one numerical, one entailment) and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
Perspective: Unmanned salons are deadly.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Choose the best option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines | A | Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
Perspective: Unmanned salons are deadly.
Question 1: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Choose the best option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermin... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent entailment/judgement sub-problem is fused into the original claim-vs-perspective question, requiring the solver to separate and solve two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": ... |
Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
Perspective: Unmanned salons are very deadly.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the correct option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Neither
(D) Both
(E) Irrelevant
(F) Ambiguous
(G) Strongly supports
(H) Strongly undermines
(I) Mixed
(J) Ca... | A | Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
Perspective: Unmanned salons are very deadly. [Separate sub-problem — unrelated to the core claim: an independent report indicates that prices for tanning sessions in unmanned salons decreased by 30% last year. Independently, consider whether that price drop alone would justi... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, separate sub-problem (about price change) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the unrelated subtask from the main support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned. Perspective: Unmanned salons, while legal, are also deadly. Determine whether the perspective supports, undermines, or is neutral toward the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned. Perspective: Unmanned salons, while legal, are also deadly. Determine whether the perspective supports, undermines, or is neutral toward the claim. Separately (as an independent subtask that should not affect your judgment about the claim), classify the unrelated sentence "In... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, separate classification subtask is fused into the main prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated subtask influence the original judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diff... |
Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
Perspective: Unmanned salons may be legal, but they also may be deadly.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, classify it as Supports; otherwise classify it as Underm... | A | Statement: Claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
Perspective: Unmanned salons may be legal, but they also may be deadly.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, classify it as Supports; otherwise classify it as Underm... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (expected incident count) is fused into the original classification task so the solver must separate and answer two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: Decreased Conflict and the end of the mercenary age. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim | A | Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: Decreased Conflict and the end of the mercenary age. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim. Additionally, as a separate and unrelated subtask, d... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent arithmetic sub-problem into the original question so the solver must separate two tasks (main textual inference and an unrelated numeric check).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mo... |
Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: The end of the mercenary age is related to decreased conflict.
Task: Based only on the claim and the perspective above, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of the words: support or... | support | Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: The end of the mercenary age is related to decreased conflict.
Task: Based only on the claim and the perspective above, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of the words: support or... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent secondary sub-question is fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate - ... |
Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Mercenaries are still hired by NGOs.
Question: Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. | B | Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Mercenaries are still hired by NGOs.
Question: Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. Additionally (separate task): classify the perspective sentence "Mercenaries are still hired by NGOs."... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the sentence as empirical vs. normative) is fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the secondary classification influence the main support/undermine judgment.",
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: NGOs still hire mercenaries. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: NGOs still hire mercenaries. Additionally, for a separate task, if three NGOs each hire two private contractors, how many contractors are hired in total? (This arithmetic sub-problem is independent of the evaluation below.) D... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the main natural language inference task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two unrelated problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "modera... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The prevalence of 'African mercenaries' is decreasing. Perspective: There is still a place for mercenaries working for NGOs. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option from (A) through (J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) neutral or irrelevant (... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: The prevalence of 'African mercenaries' is decreasing. Perspective: There is still a place for mercenaries working for NGOs. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option from (A) through (J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) neutral or irrelevant (... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task (descriptive vs. prescriptive) is fused into the main inference problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate... |
Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: Mercenaries still have a presence in coups. Choose the best option (A-J) that describes the relationship between the pers... | B | Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: Mercenaries still have a presence in coups. Choose the best option (A-J) that describes the relationship between the pers... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent geographic-identification subtask is fused into the main judgment task, requiring the solver to parse and answer two separate questions and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_in... |
Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Mercenaries are still often involved in political coups.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) N/A
(D) N/A
(E) N/A
(F) N/A
(G) N/A
(H) N/A
(I) N/A
(J) N/A
Solution: ... | B | Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Mercenaries are still often involved in political coups. As an additional, independent task included in the same prompt, consider this separate data point: in one dataset 12 out of 40 documented coups in a past decade involved mercena... | B
Explanation: The perspective states that mercenaries are still often involved in political coups, which directly contradicts the claim that their prevalence is decreasing, so it undermines the claim. (Separate calculation: percent decrease from 12 to 4 = (12 - 4) / 12 = 8/12 = 66.666...% ≈ 66.7%.) | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numerical sub-problem (percentage decrease calculation) is fused into the main natural language inference task, forcing the solver to separate and handle two distinct subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated... |
Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Mercenaries can still be found in coups.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective both s... | B | Statement: Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Mercenaries can still be found in coups.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective both s... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classifying literal vs. metaphorical usage) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: Legislation against mercenaries. Choose the best option from the list below.
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both suppo... | A | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing. Perspective: Legislation against mercenaries. Choose the best option from the list below.
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both suppo... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent, logically separate sub-problem (classify the perspective as supply-side/demand-side) into the main question so the solver must separately handle two inferences and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Laws are being passed against mercenaries.
Select one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
Perspective: Laws are being passed against mercenaries.
Select one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Separately (independent task): Eva... | First pair: A
Second pair (separate task): A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent claim–perspective pair is appended, requiring the solver to separate two distinct classification tasks and avoid conflating evidence between them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "modera... |
Statement: Claim: We must use Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to strike terrorist targets.
Perspective: Using drones blurs the distinction between war and peace.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: We must use Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to strike terrorist targets.
Perspective: Using drones blurs the distinction between war and peace.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine.
[Separate task — independent question, do not ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify a sentence as descriptive or normative) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two independent questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums preserve and display our heritage and therefore should be accessible to all of the public free of charge.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
(C) Neither
(D) Both
(E) ... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums preserve and display our heritage and therefore should be accessible to all of the public free of charge.
Separate sub-problem (unrelated to the main selection): Based solely on the perspective above, does the statement "All institutions ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "A separate, independent sub-problem is fused into the original question so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid conflating their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the add... |
Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Since museums essentially maintain our collective histories, there should be free access to all citizens. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Since museums essentially maintain our collective histories, there should be free access to all citizens. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, independent subtask (do not let this affect your main judgment), also ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify normative vs empirical reasoning and propose a contradicting empirical observation) is fused into the original judgment task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not conflate them.",
"name": "Compositional und... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums exist as an archive of our shared experiences and history, and as such, should grant access to all without charge.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums exist as an archive of our shared experiences and history, and as such, should grant access to all without charge.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines... | First question (multiple choice): A
Second (independent) subtask — primary justification: Historical preservation (the perspective emphasizes museums as an archive of shared experiences and history, which points to preservation as the main justification). | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the primary justification) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": ... |
Statement: Given the claim: Make all museums free of charge. And the perspective: State funding should be used elsewhere. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines | B | Statement: Given the claim: Make all museums free of charge. And the perspective: State funding should be used elsewhere. Separately (independent question): if the government has $10,000,000 and decides to allocate 3% to a pilot recycling program, how much funding does that program receive? Decide whether the perspecti... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (budget allocation) is fused into the main natural language inference task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_dif... |
Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Funding for museums is wasteful. Choose the best answer: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Both supports and undermines the c... | B | Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Funding for museums is wasteful. Choose the best answer: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Both supports and undermines the c... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-problem (about parks/property values) is fused into the original museums support/undermine task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and reason about each independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: We should not expect the state to fund museums.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: We should not expect the state to fund museums.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
Additionally, as a separate and unrelated sub-question, suppose a small local museum charges $7 p... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the main semantic judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the numerical calculation influence the claim-vs-perspective judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums are a crucial source of inspiration and education.
Question: Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim that museums should be free of charge? Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums are a crucial source of inspiration and education.
Separately, evaluate this unrelated mini-problem: Statement: Claim: Implement free school lunches. Perspective: Free lunches improve student concentration. Based solely on that perspective... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, parallel classification sub-problem (about free school lunches) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two classification tasks and avoid cross-contamination of evidence or labels.",
"name": "Compositional un... |
Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Museums are a necessary part of a society's understanding of culture and edification. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) support (B) undermine | A | Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Museums are a necessary part of a society's understanding of culture and edification. Additional unrelated mini-question (answer not required to judge the main claim): Is the sentence "Free admission increases attendance" best classified as (1) a causal hy... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (classification of a sentence) is fused into the problem so the solver must separate the unrelated mini-task from the main inference about support/undermine.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffi... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums are critical to the motivations as well as the education of a society as a whole.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Museums are critical to the motivations as well as the education of a society as a whole.
Administrative subtask (separate): A museum recorded 1,200 visitors in a month; 30% were students admitted free of charge. How many paying visitors attended ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic/admin sub-problem is fused into the original argumentative evaluation, forcing the solver to separate tasks and avoid being distracted by the unrelated calculation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_... |
Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Museum charges can be offset by government funding. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge. Perspective: Museum charges can be offset by government funding. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate exercise (independent of the claim assessment), suppose a museum charges $10 per visitor and currently has 100,000 annual ... | support
Separate exercise: Original revenue = $10 * 100,000 = $1,000,000. New attendance = 100,000 * 1.25 = 125,000; new revenue = $10 * 125,000 = $1,250,000. Revenue increases by $250,000. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numerical subproblem (attendance/revenue calculation) was fused into the original textual judgment task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficu... |
Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Free museums encourage attendance.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: Free museums encourage attendance.
Subproblem (independent): Claim: Limit museum capacity at peak times to protect fragile exhibits. Perspective: Limiting capacity improves preservation but may reduce immediate attendance.
Question: For the first claim (Ma... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent claim-perspective sub-problem about limiting museum capacity was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve two distinct sub-problems and focus on the original claim.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: People are more likely to attend museums if they are free.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer using a single word: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: People are more likely to attend museums if they are free.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer using a single word: support or undermine.
Separate note (independent sub-problem): Evaluate whether the additional statement "... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question about whether free admission necessarily doubles attendance was fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate the main claim-evaluation from this unrelated logical entailment task.",
"name": "Compositional understandi... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: If state-funded, there is little incentive to increase numbers of visitors.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Make all museums free of charge.
Perspective: If state-funded, there is little incentive to increase numbers of visitors.
Separately, three local galleries together currently attract 150 visitors a day; if they eliminate fees and combined daily visitors rise to 210, what is the percent increa... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent numeric sub-problem (a percent-change calculation about gallery visitors) into the main prompt so the solver must separate the arithmetic task from the evaluative judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimat... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess lacks the necessary physical activity. Answer with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess lacks the necessary physical activity. Additionally, as a separate classification task (do not include this in your final answer), state whe... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classifying the perspective as empirical vs. value judgment) is fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid producing the secondary classification as the final answer.",
"name": "Compositi... |
Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Olympic sports are suppose to be physical. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Olympic sports are suppose to be physical. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. Additionally, as a separate sub-task (independent of the ma... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task (normative vs. descriptive) is fused into the main support/undermine task so the solver must separate the two analyses and not let the auxiliary judgment affect the main relation decision.",
"name": "Compositional un... |
Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: Mind sports are some of the world's oldest and most contested competitive sports.
Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective suppo... | A | Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: Mind sports are some of the world's oldest and most contested competitive sports.
Also, as a separate classification task, indicate... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-task (classify the sentence as fact or opinion) is fused into the original evaluation task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two different problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Statement: Given the claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. And the perspective: Mind sports have been around for centuries and are competitive. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Treat a perspective as supporting if it could possibly convince som... | support | Statement: Given the claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. And the perspective: Mind sports have been around for centuries and are competitive. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Treat a perspective as supporting if it could possibly convince som... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent counting sub-problem (single-elimination tournament match count) was fused into the main classification task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: Mind sports is the oldest and most highly competitive sports.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) support (B) undermine | A | Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: Mind sports is the oldest and most highly competitive sports.
Question 1: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) support (B) undermine
Separate, unrelated question (answer independent... | Question 1 answer: A
Question 2 answer (separate): D | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-problem (is the sentence a fact or opinion) was fused into the original inference task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two distinct questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_d... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess ought to qualify as an Olympic sport. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess ought to qualify as an Olympic sport. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent subtask, indicate whether the perspective would also imply that... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (whether the perspective implies e-sports should be Olympic) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the secondary question affect the primary judgment.",
"name": "Composi... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: It would be appropriate for Chess to become an Olympic sport.
Choose the best option:
(A) The perspecti... | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: It would be appropriate for Chess to become an Olympic sport.
Choose the best option:
(A) The perspecti... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, related sub-problem (about eSports and Olympic recognition) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two similar classification problems independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess is currently not an Olympic sport, but it should be. Answer with exactly one word: support or undermine | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess is currently not an Olympic sport, but it should be. As a separate, independent check (do not let this change your final output), consider w... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent fact-checking sub-task about the factual accuracy of the perspective's opening clause was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the evaluation of factual accuracy from the main support/undermine judgment.",
"name... |
Statement: Given the claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: chess should be included in the list of Olympic sport. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Given the claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: chess should be included in the list of Olympic sport. Answer with either support or undermine. As a separate, ind... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent true/false sub-problem into the original task so the solver must separate and solve two independent items rather than only evaluating the claim-perspective relation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diff... |
Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: Opening up the Olympics for borderline sports is bad in itself.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? | undermine | Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
Perspective: Opening up the Olympics for borderline sports is bad in itself.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Separately (as an independent subtask), classify the sentence "Opening up the Olympics... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, clearly separable sub-problem (classify the perspective sentence as normative vs descriptive) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid letting the subtask influence the main inference.",
"name": "C... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.