Split (1)

train · 1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

original_problem stringlengths 162 931	original_solution stringclasses 6 values	augmented_problem stringlengths 281 1.35k	augmented_solution stringclasses 68 values	distractor_metadata dict
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess is highly popular and should be represented. Choose the best option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) b...	A	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess is highly popular and should be represented. Additionally, separately indicate whether the perspective...	Main task: A (supports). Additional subtask: 1 (popularity). Explanation: The perspective argues for representation on the basis of popularity, which supports the claim that mind sports should be Olympic sports; the added classification about popularity vs skill is an independent annotation and does not change the supp...	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification subtask (popularity vs skill) is fused into the original judgment problem, requiring the solver to separate and resolve two distinct decisions.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increa...
Statement: Given the claim: "Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports." and the perspective: "Chess is popular worldwide and should be an Olympic sport." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Statement: Given the claim: "Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports." and the perspective: "Chess is popular worldwide and should be an Olympic sport." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, unrelated sub-task, also decide whether the factua...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent factual sub-question about chess (whether its board has 64 squares) is fused into the main inference task, forcing the solver to separate two tasks: (1) judge support/undermine and (2) evaluate a factual claim.", "name": "Compositional unde...
Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: The popularity of Chess worldwide sets it up as an appropriate Olympic sport. Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine	support	Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: The popularity of Chess worldwide sets it up as an appropriate Olympic sport. Separately, as a side question, if an 8-player single-elimination chess final is held, how many matches are needed to determine a champi...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, small sub-problem (a tournament match-count question) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate two distinct reasoning tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate ...
Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess is one of the popular sport that should be represented at the Olympic. Question: Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess is one of the popular sport that should be represented at the Olympic. Separately (unrelated to the main judgement), label the sentence 'Quizzing builds quick recall skills' as either FACT or OPINION. Questio...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent labeling task (fact vs opinion) was fused into the main problem so a model must separate two sub-problems and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate; mid-tier m...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. A perspective is supporting if it could plausibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Pe...	A	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. A perspective is supporting if it could plausibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Pe...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a small combinatorial/math question about tournament rounds) is fused into the main natural language inference task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid answering the wrong one.", "name": "Compositional und...
Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess cannot ensure fair play. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim	B	Statement: Claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports. Perspective: Chess cannot ensure fair play. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent subtask, ind...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, context-related subtask (classify the perspective sentence as opinion vs. fact) is fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate and resolve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "es...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity allows people to speak the truth without fearing harm to their careers. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity allows people to speak the truth without fearing harm to their careers. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine. (Independe...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent numeric sub-problem (a simple fraction/count calculation) was fused into the main natural-language reasoning task so the solver must separate the two tasks and answer them independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], ...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity encourages honesty. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity encourages honesty. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, evaluate the following independent item (answer it as a separate judgment, not as part of the ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, related sub-problem is fused into the original question so the solver must separate the two evaluations and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — forces the...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity enables citizens to exercise their right to free speech. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim Solution...	A	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity enables citizens to exercise their right to free speech. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim Additio...	A; Invalid	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent logical-validity sub-problem (affirming the consequent) is fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the sub-problem influence the primary judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" ...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Anonymity online allows for free speech. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine	support	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Anonymity online allows for free speech. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Separately, as an independent task, classify the follow...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification subtask is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid letting the secondary task influence the main judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase"...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity leads to spam. Answer with one word: support or undermine	undermine	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity leads to spam. Separately, classify the tone of the perspective as 'practical' or 'emotional' — this is an independent mini-tas...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent mini-task (tone classification) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and handle two subproblems independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — mid-tier ...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Span proliferates with anonymity on the internet. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words: support or undermine	undermine	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Span proliferates with anonymity on the internet. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words: support or undermine. As a separate, independent task (do no...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent secondary classification task is fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks (judging support/undermine vs. identifying primary concern) and avoid cross-contamination of reasoning.", "name": "Compositional understa...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity increases cyberbullying and trolling. Answer with either support or undermine	undermine	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity increases cyberbullying and trolling. Answer with either support or undermine. Separately, a survey reported that 70% of docume...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Fused an independent arithmetic sub-problem (compute 70% of 210) into the original classification task so the solver must separate and solve two distinct tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat...
Problem: Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Individuals are more likely to bully and troll when they are anonymous. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option: (A) The perspective supports the claim (B) The...	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Individuals are more likely to bully and troll when they are anonymous. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option: (A) The perspective supports the claim (B) The...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent subtask (classify a sentence as factual or opinion) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and address two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": ...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Cyberbullying and trolling are more common when people's internet activity is anonymous. Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Cyberbullying and trolling are more common when people's internet activity is anonymous. Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines Separate, independen...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about counting anonymous posts was fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate and solve two tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity allows people to experiment and construct with new social identities. Solution: support	support	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity allows people to experiment and construct with new social identities. Separately, as an independent sub-problem, state whether ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent true/false sub-question about the capital of Australia is fused into the task, requiring the solver to separate the main perspective-vs-claim judgment from the unrelated factual check.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "e...
Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this decision rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the intern...	support	Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this decision rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the intern...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent logical sub-problem is fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and solve them independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — for...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: The anonymity of the internet allows people to create new social identities for themselves. Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: if the perspective could possibly...	support	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: The anonymity of the internet allows people to create new social identities for themselves. Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: if the perspective could possibly...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent yes/no subtask is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two problems and not let the secondary decision interfere with the main classification.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_incre...
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity allows internet users to engage in illegal activities. Answer with either support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: Internet anonymity allows internet users to engage in illegal activities. For this first claim, answer with either support or undermine....	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate claim-and-perspective evaluation about identity verification) is fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ...
Problem: Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: When internet users are anonymous, they are more easily able to engage in illegal activities. Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly con...	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: When internet users are anonymous, they are more easily able to engage in illegal activities. Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly con...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, small quantitative sub-question (a survey prevalence choice) was fused into the main reasoning task so the solver must separate the two problems and not let the sub-question influence the main judgement.", "name": "Compositional understand...
Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: There is less deterrence to illegal activities on the internet when people are able to remain anonymous. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: If the perspective could poss...	undermine	Statement: Claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law. Perspective: There is less deterrence to illegal activities on the internet when people are able to remain anonymous. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule: If the perspective could poss...	undermine; empirical	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification sub-problem (empirical vs normative) was fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_inc...
Statement: Claim: Sports initiations should be banned. Perspective: Encourages binge drinking and bullying. Based only on this claim and perspective, does the perspective support or undermine the claim?	support	Statement: Claim: Sports initiations should be banned. Perspective: Encourages binge drinking and bullying. Based only on this claim and perspective, does the perspective support or undermine the claim? In a separate, independent sub-problem, consider another perspective that might be offered: "Fosters camaraderie and ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (evaluating a different perspective) was fused into the original prompt, requiring the solver to separate and answer two perspective-evaluation tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess ought to qualify as an Olympic sport. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim	A	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess ought to qualify as an Olympic sport. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim Separate sub-problem (independent): Determine whether the statement "Chess req...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, additional classification sub-problem about chess is fused into the original entailment/support task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating their answers.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: It would be appropriate for Chess to become an Olympic sport. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Reply with exactly one word: support or undermine	support	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: It would be appropriate for Chess to become an Olympic sport. As a separate, unrelated classification task for your internal reasoning only, decide whether the perspective sentence expresses primarily a value judgment or a factual prediction (do not include ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-task (classify the perspective as a value judgment or factual prediction) is fused into the problem, requiring the solver to separate that sub-problem from the main entailment question.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ],...
Statement: Given the claim and perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess is currently not an Olympic sport, but it should be. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine	support	Statement: Given the claim and perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess is currently not an Olympic sport, but it should be. (Separately, as an independent sub-problem, you may note whether the perspective contains an ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent auxiliary analysis (identifying factual vs. normative components) is fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate the auxiliary sub-problem from the primary support/undermine decision.", "name": "Compositional understanding" ...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: chess should be included in the list of Olympic sport. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: chess should be included in the list of Olympic sport. Additionally, as a separate question, state whether the arithmetic statement '7 × 8 = 56' is true or false (answer true or false). Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem ('7 × 8 = 56?') is fused into the original inference task so the solver must separate and solve two unrelated tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — li...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Opening up the Olympics for borderline sports is bad in itself. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Opening up the Olympics for borderline sports is bad in itself. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines Separate (independent) planning task: For budgeting purposes, suppose 8 borderline sports ...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (budget calculation) is fused into the main inference task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and ignore the irrelevant calculation when answering the original question.", "name": "Compositional understan...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess lacks the necessary physical activity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option from (A) through (J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) neutral or unclear (D) both supp...	B	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess lacks the necessary physical activity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option from (A) through (J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) neutral or unclear (D) both supp...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent second claim-perspective pair (about eSports and the Olympics) is fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two evaluations and not conflate them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_d...
Statement: Given the claim and a perspective below, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Olympic sports are suppose to be physical.	undermine	Statement: Given the claim and a perspective below, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Olympic sports are suppose to be physical. Additionally, as a separate task (independent from the main evaluation), indicate whether the claim 'Chess...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the claim as normative/descriptive and count words) is fused into the original task so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficu...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess is highly popular and should be represented. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. (A) support (B) undermine	A	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess is highly popular and should be represented. Additionally, as a separate unrelated sub-problem, answer whether 47 is a prime number by choosing 'Yes' or 'No'. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. (A) support...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (is 47 prime?) is fused into the main textual inference task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two unrelated tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Modera...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess is popular worldwide and should be an Olympic sport. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option.	A	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess is popular worldwide and should be an Olympic sport. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option. Separately, as an independent sub-problem, consider the claim: "Soccer must be at the Olympics." Perspectiv...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, structurally identical sub-problem about a different sport (soccer) was fused into the original problem to force the solver to separate and evaluate two parallel claims independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "e...
Statement: Given the claim: "Chess must be at the Olympics." and the perspective: "The popularity of Chess worldwide sets it up as an appropriate Olympic sport.", determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Statement: Given the claim: "Chess must be at the Olympics." and the perspective: "The popularity of Chess worldwide sets it up as an appropriate Olympic sport.", additionally, if a single-elimination chess tournament begins with 128 players, how many rounds are required to determine a champion? Determine whether the p...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (computing rounds in a single-elimination tournament) is fused into the original inference task so the solver must separate the two tasks and ignore the irrelevant sub-problem when judging support/undermine.", "name": "Compositi...
Problem: Statement: Given the claim: "Chess must be at the Olympics." and the perspective: "Chess is one of the popular sport that should be represented at the Olympic." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine	support	Problem: Statement: Given the claim: "Chess must be at the Olympics." and the perspective: "Chess is one of the popular sport that should be represented at the Olympic." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. Additionally, as a separate, unre...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent factual sub-problem ('Chess tournaments use clocks') is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid reporting the sub-answer.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficu...
Statement: Given the following claim and perspective, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim using this rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Introducin...	support	Statement: Given the following claim and perspective, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim using this rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Introducin...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic/sub-problem (counting matches in a single-elimination tournament) was fused into the main natural-language evaluation so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the added calculation distract from the primary judgment.", ...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A) through (J) below. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess cannot ensure fair play. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) nei...	B	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A) through (J) below. Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Chess cannot ensure fair play. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) nei...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent true/false chess trivia subtask was fused into the main classification problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": ...
Statement: Given the claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. And the perspective: Mind sports are some of the world's oldest and most contested competitive sports. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Statement: Given the claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. And the perspective: Mind sports are some of the world's oldest and most contested competitive sports. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate task (independent of the claim-perspective reasoning), indicate whether the ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (voice identification and verb counting) is fused into the original inference task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_inc...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Mind sports have been around for centuries and are competitive. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Choose o...	A	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Mind sports have been around for centuries and are competitive. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Choose o...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (a small prime-number attention check) is fused into the main prompt so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid letting the unrelated task influence the main judgement.", "name": "Compositional understanding" ...
Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Mind sports is the oldest and most highly competitive sports. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim	A	Statement: Claim: Chess must be at the Olympics. Perspective: Mind sports is the oldest and most highly competitive sports. Separately (independent subtask): In a standard chess set each player starts with 8 pawns and 2 knights. How many pawns and knights are there on the board at the start in total? (This subtask is i...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, self-contained subtask about piece counts in chess is fused into the problem, forcing the solver to separate the unrelated arithmetic sub-problem from the main argumentative judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "e...
Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council. Perspective: It would make the UNSC more effective and efficient. Solution: ['support']	['support']	Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council. Perspective: It would make the UNSC more effective and efficient. Additionally, indicate whether this perspective is primarily an empirical claim (predicting or reporting e...	['support']	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs. value judgment and justify) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate two tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase...
Statement: Claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council. Perspective: Argument 2: UNSC sanctions become powerless without PM. Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose one option labeled (A) through (J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) neutral (D) both supports a...	A	Statement: Claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council. Perspective: Argument 2: UNSC sanctions become powerless without PM. As a separate sub-problem, if the Security Council has 15 members and 5 are permanent members, what percentage of the Council is made up of permanent members? Based on ...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-question about the proportion of permanent members (percentage of 5 out of 15) is fused into the primary normative question, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understan...