original_problem stringlengths 162 931 | original_solution stringclasses 6
values | augmented_problem stringlengths 281 1.35k | augmented_solution stringclasses 68
values | distractor_metadata dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Problem: Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Saturated fats in meat help the immune and nervous system. Choose one option: (A) Support (B) Undermine
Solution: B | B | Problem: Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Saturated fats in meat help the immune and nervous system. Additionally, as a separate judgment, indicate whether the perspective is primar... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs moral) was fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate the two judgments.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate —... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Lean red meat, eaten in moderation, can be a healthful part of a balanced diet.
Choose the best option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) neutral/irrelevant
(D) both supports and undermines
(E... | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Lean red meat, eaten in moderation, can be a healthful part of a balanced diet.
Choose the best option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) neutral/irrelevant
(D) both supports and undermines
(E... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (menu-item vegetarian classification) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and avoid letting the unrelated subtask influence the original judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Red meat can be unhealthy if eaten in large quantities and too often but is healthy in moderation. Respond with either the single word support ... | undermine | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Red meat can be unhealthy if eaten in large quantities and too often but is healthy in moderation. As an additional, unrelated micro-task (fuse... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent factual-judgment subtask into the main claim-perspective evaluation, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and avoid cross-task interference.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A balanced and healthy diet consists of vegetables and lean red meat. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A balanced and healthy diet consists of vegetables and lean red meat. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent sub-task, evaluate the following simple syllogism and answer true or false: "All mammals b... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent syllogism-checking sub-task was fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the added reasoning affect the main judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Lean red meat can be healthy.
Question: Based only on whether the perspective agrees with or contradicts the claim, choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective is neutral or ambi... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Lean red meat can be healthy.
Also consider this separate, unrelated logic sub-problem: "If all A are B, and some B are C, does it necessarily follow that some A are C?"
Question: Based only on whether the perspective agrees with or contradicts the claim, c... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical sub-question (a syllogism) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate the unrelated sub-problem from the main claim-vs-perspective judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficu... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Lean red meat is not necessarily unhealthy. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Support (B) Undermine (C) Both support and undermine (D) Neither support nor undermine | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Lean red meat is not necessarily unhealthy. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Support (B) Undermine (C) Both support and undermine (D) Neither support nor undermine. Separately, as an unrelated attention check, indicate whe... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent factual sub-question was fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate the unrelated attention-check task from the primary inference about whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.",
"name": "Compositional u... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Vegetarian diets can cause the death of animals too. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Vegetarian diets can cause the death of animals too. Separately, the pamphlet accompanying the claim asks an unrelated question: it lists 15 plant-based recipes and 7 vegan snacks — how many... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numeric sub-problem (counting items) was fused into the original argumentative judgment task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two distinct subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Animals can also die as a result of vegetarian diets.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
Solution: B | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Animals can also die as a result of vegetarian diets.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
Additional (independent) task: Separately, classify the perspective itself as either a "counterargument" (i... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as 'counterargument' or 'limitation') is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two related-but-distinct questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Animals will still die even if everyone were to follow a vegetarian diet.
Question: Based on the perspective, choose the option that best describes whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Options:
(A) Strongly supports the claim
(B) Undermi... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Animals will still die even if everyone were to follow a vegetarian diet.
Question: Based on the perspective, choose the option that best describes whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Options:
(A) Strongly supports the claim
(B) Undermi... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask was fused into the prompt so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — introduces an additional, plau... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Vegetarian diets can cause the death of animals too.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option by letter.
Options:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) strongly supports
(D) strongly undermines
(... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Vegetarian diets can cause the death of animals too.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option by letter.
Options:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) strongly supports
(D) strongly undermines
(... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical inference sub-question was fused into the original ethical evaluation problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Eating meat increases the risk of getting type 2 diabetes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Eating meat increases the risk of getting type 2 diabetes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Separately, ev... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, contextually related sub-problem (about smoking vs vaping) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two problems and not let the unrelated sub-problem affect the original judgement.",
"name": "Compositional underst... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Eating More Meat is Linked to Higher Risk of Type 2.
Question: Does the perspective support, undermine, or is it neutral/irrelevant to the claim?
Options:
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
(C) Neutral/Irrelevant | A | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Eating More Meat is Linked to Higher Risk of Type 2.
Additionally, as a separate sub-question, indicate whether the perspective is asserting a causal claim (that eating more meat causes a higher risk of Type 2) or is only reporting a correlation between meat... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-question (causal vs. correlational interpretation) into the main problem so the solver must separate the tasks and not let the extra question alter the primary support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: "Everyone should go vegetarian." Perspective: "Processed vegetarian protein options such as tofu can cause more greenhouse gas pollution than farming meat." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) T... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: "Everyone should go vegetarian." Perspective: "Processed vegetarian protein options such as tofu can cause more greenhouse gas pollution than farming meat." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) T... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classifying the claim as normative vs. empirical) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the unrelated subtask affect the main perspective-support judgment.",
"name": "C... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Farming meat can produce less pollution than companies that process vegetarian proteins like tofu. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Farming meat can produce less pollution than companies that process vegetarian proteins like tofu. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines. Additionally, in a separate sub-question (answer i... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-problem (empirical vs. value judgment) was fused into the original judgment task so the solver must separate and solve both tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Some vegetarian options... | B | Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Some vegetarian options... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (survey percentage calculation) is fused into the main textual entailment-style judgment, forcing the solver to separate two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Processed vegetarian protein is less environmentally friendly than eating meat.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both supports and undermines
(D) neutral or insufficient informa... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Processed vegetarian protein is less environmentally friendly than eating meat. Separately, as an independent sub-problem, evaluate whether that perspective is primarily an empirical claim about life-cycle environmental impacts (an assertion about measured e... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent analytic sub-task (classify the perspective as empirical vs. value judgement) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and handle two distinct analyses.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated... |
Statement: Given the claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. And the perspective: It is not necessary to become vegetarian to lower our environmental footprint. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Given the claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. And the perspective: It is not necessary to become vegetarian to lower our environmental footprint. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, indicate whether the perspective is making an empirical claim (about measurable e... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question was fused into the original task so the solver must separate the assessment of support/undermine from a classification of the perspective as empirical vs. normative.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimat... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: There are ways other than giving up meat to help the environment.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) support
(B) undermine
(C) both support and undermine
(D) neither support nor undermine
(E) ambiguous
... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: There are ways other than giving up meat to help the environment. (Separate sub-problem: evaluate whether this sentence is making a factual claim about the effectiveness of those other ways at reducing environmental harm, or merely pointing out that alternat... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent analytical sub-question about whether the perspective asserts effectiveness of alternatives is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate that sub-problem from the original claim-comparison.",
"name": "Compositional under... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: People do not have to stop eating meat to improve environmental conditions.
Options:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Answer with the letter of the best option. | B | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: People do not have to stop eating meat to improve environmental conditions.
Separately, if a survey of 100 individuals reported 30 vegetarians, 45 omnivores, and 25 flexitarians, w... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic/sub-question about survey percentages was fused into the original argumentative evaluation, requiring the solver to separate the unrelated subtask from the primary reasoning about support vs. undermine.",
"name": "Compositional u... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegetarian diet conserves water. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Options: (A) support (B) undermine | A | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegetarian diet conserves water. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Options: (A) support (B) undermine. Separately, if a farmer uses 2400 liters of water to irrigate 3 equal fields, how many liters does each field receive? (Answer the ari... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (dividing 2400 liters among 3 fields) was fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct reasoning tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: People can conserve water by becoming a vegetarian. Choose the best option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) Neutral
(D) Irrelevant
(E) Contradicts
(F) Strengthens the opposite
(G) Partially ... | A | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: People can conserve water by becoming a vegetarian. Choose the best option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) Neutral
(D) Irrelevant
(E) Contradicts
(F) Strengthens the opposite
(G) Partially ... | Main classification answer: A (supports). Explanation: The perspective provides a benefit—water conservation—that gives a practical reason in favor of everyone going vegetarian, so it supports the claim.
Separate calculation: 250 liters/person/day * 4 people * 3 days = 3000 liters. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (computing water saved) is fused into the original classification task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Becoming a vegetarian is healthy for the environment because people conserve more water. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Becoming a vegetarian is healthy for the environment because people conserve more water. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. Separately, as an independent subtask (do not let it affect ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (empirical vs. value) is fused into the original judgement task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct decisions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate —... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Becoming vegetarian will not help alleviate world hunger.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Reply with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Becoming vegetarian will not help alleviate world hunger.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Reply with a single word: support or undermine.
Separate sub-problem (unrelated): Statement: Claim: Recycling reduces pollution.
Perspec... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent claim/perspective pair (a separate question about recycling) into the original prompt so the solver must separate and evaluate two independent sub-problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_in... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: World hunger can not be fixed by vegetarianism.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: World hunger can not be fixed by vegetarianism.
Additionally, consider this separate sub-problem: Some people argue the following unrelated inference — 'If a policy cannot completely eliminate a problem, then advocating it is unjustified.' Does that inferenc... | B
Explanation: The given perspective denies that vegetarianism would fix world hunger; if the claim that everyone should go vegetarian is (at least partly) justified by solving world hunger, then the perspective undermines that justification. The injected separate sub-problem is independent and does not change the rela... | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (about whether inability to completely eliminate a problem makes a policy unjustified) is fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate and evaluate two pieces of reasoning.",
"name": "Compositional under... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: There must be access to meats in order to alleviate world hunger. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: There must be access to meats in order to alleviate world hunger. Separately (unrelated sub-task): suppose a survey of 500 people found that 40% cite "cultural tradition" as their primary reason for eating meat; how many respondents is that? Determine whethe... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (survey percentage calculation) is fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the unrelated calculation affect the support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Co... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Vegetarian diets won't help world hunger. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Vegetarian diets won't help world hunger. (Separate subtask: independently decide whether the perspective is making an empirical claim about food distribution or a normative claim about ethical obligations; treat that as a distinct evaluation and do not let ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "A separate, independent sub-question was fused into the main problem asking the solver to classify the perspective as empirical or normative. This forces the model to separate two tasks (type-classification and support/undermine judgment) rather than treating t... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Vegetarianism doesn't reduce world hunger.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective both supports and undermines the ... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Vegetarianism doesn't reduce world hunger.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective both supports and undermines the ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical sub-question (a syllogism about dogs and mammals) is fused into the original multiple-choice question so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid conflating their reasoning.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Raising animals for food contributes to air and water pollution. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Provide a single-word answer: support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Raising animals for food contributes to air and water pollution. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Provide a single-word answer: support or undermine. Separate task (unrelated): As an independent annotation, for the st... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated binary classification task was fused into the prompt so a model must separate the two tasks and not let the secondary task affect the main judgement.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Vegetarians live longer. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) support (B) undermine | A | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Vegetarians live longer. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) support (B) undermine. Separate, independent sub-task: For this unrelated quick check, state whether the mathematical statement 'All squares are rectangles' is True... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate true/false math check) is fused into the main judgement task, forcing the solver to separate and address two distinct tasks within one prompt.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficult... |
Problem: Statement: Given the claim and a perspective below, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: It has been proven that Vegetarians Live Longer.
Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Given the claim and a perspective below, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: It has been proven that Vegetarians Live Longer.
Additionally, as a separate exercise unrelated to the claim-perspective evaluation, compu... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (sum of integers 1 to 10) is fused into the original inference question, forcing the solver to separate the tasks and avoid using the unrelated computation when judging support or undermine.",
"name": "Compositional u... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Eating meat provides a better source of iron than a v... | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Eating meat provides a better source of iron than a v... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (compute 47 + 58) was fused into the original classification task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the arithmetic distract from the primary judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Iron from meat is often cited as better than vegetables. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Iron from meat is often cited as better than vegetables. Answer with either support or undermine. As a separate sub-task (do not conflate with the main judgment), indicate which form of diet... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (identify which iron form is absorbed more efficiently) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the secondary question alter the main support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Com... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: I think iron from meat eating is healthier than the vegetarian way. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective both supports... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: I think iron from meat eating is healthier than the vegetarian way. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective both supports... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (factual vs. opinion) is fused into the main inference problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve both parts independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase"... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Producing one hamburger destroys 55 square feet of rainforest.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Options:
(A) support
(B) undermine
Solution: A | A | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Producing one hamburger destroys 55 square feet of rainforest. Separately, as an additional calculation task, if producing one hamburger destroys 55 square feet, approximately how many hamburgers would destroy one acre (43,560 square feet)?
Question: Does th... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (how many hamburgers equal one acre of rainforest destroyed) was fused into the original environmental-argument classification task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating the numeric calculatio... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports, undermines, or is neutral toward the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Rainforests are destroyed to support animals used for food. Choose one option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C... | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports, undermines, or is neutral toward the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Rainforests are destroyed to support animals used for food. Choose one option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (solve 3x - 4 = 11) is fused into the original classification task so the solver must separate and handle two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mode... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: There is nothing inherently cruel about raising animals for food.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Options:
(A) supports
(B) undermines | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: There is nothing inherently cruel about raising animals for food.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Options:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Additionally, as a separate sub-problem (unrelated to the reasoning above), answer... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, similar classification sub-problem was fused into the item so the solver must separate the two problems and not conflate their reasoning.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — Thi... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Eating meat is part of the cycle of life.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting, otherwise it is undermining. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Eating meat is part of the cycle of life.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting, otherwise it is undermining.
Additionally, as a se... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent factual sub-question about decomposition and nutrient cycles is fused into the main inference task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct reasoning processes.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Raising animals for food is not cruel. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Raising animals for food is not cruel. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. For additional, unrelated context (which may require separate reasoni... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, self-contained claim-perspective pair (Claim B / Perspective B) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate and ignore or separately reason about it while answering the original pair.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: It is not cruel or wrong to raise animals to be eaten. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: It is not cruel or wrong to raise animals to be eaten. As a separate, independent task, also classify whether the perspective sentence is normative (expresses a value judgment) or descriptiv... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification task (normative vs. descriptive) is fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two sub-problems and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: There is nothing inherently cruel about raising animals for food.
Choose the single best option from the following:
(A) supports
(B) undermi... | B | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: There is nothing inherently cruel about raising animals for food.
Choose the single best option from the following:
(A) supports
(B) undermi... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical-inference sub-problem was fused into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate tasks and not conflate answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — li... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Eating meat is not cruel or unethical; it is a natural part of the cycle of life. Answer either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Eating meat is not cruel or unethical; it is a natural part of the cycle of life. As a separate, unrelated task, determine whether the number 37 is prime or composite. Answer either support ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (a simple primality question) is fused into the main instruction so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the independent subtask affect the main evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Meat is the best source of vitamin B12, a vitamin necessary to nervous and digestive system health. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) Neither (D) Both (E) Inconclusive (F) Strong... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Meat is the best source of vitamin B12, a vitamin necessary to nervous and digestive system health. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) Neither (D) Both (E) Inconclusive (F) Strong... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic subproblem (division of supplements among clinics) is fused into the original reasoning task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct subproblems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_inc... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: It was proven the b12 from meat is helps the nervous and digestive system. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: It was proven the b12 from meat is helps the nervous and digestive system. Additionally, as a separate task, rewrite the perspective in grammatically correct English (do not change... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent subtask (rewrite the perspective grammatically) is fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate and handle two subtasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "mode... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: For optimum nervous and digestive health, b12 from meat is ideal.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: For optimum nervous and digestive health, b12 from meat is ideal.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. Additionally, as a separate exercise unrelated to evaluating the claim, if ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about meal counts was fused into the dietary evaluation prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — introdu... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet leads to lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet leads to lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine.
Separately (unrelated subtask): For a short logical entailment check, decide w... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical entailment subtask (about tabby cats) is fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate two unrelated problems and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficu... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: If people became vegetarian, greenhouse gases would reduce.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
Options:
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
(C) both supports and undermines the claim
(D) neither supp... | A | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: If people became vegetarian, greenhouse gases would reduce. Separately, a peer reviewer asks whether the perspective should be read as a factual causal claim (that greenhouse gases would actually decrease) or as a mere opinion — evaluate that as an independe... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (classification of the perspective as factual vs. opinion) is fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate that sub-problem from the main support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet is better for the planet because it reduces greenhouse gases.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
Solution: A | A | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet is better for the planet because it reduces greenhouse gases. Additionally, a short empirical note in the same report lists numerical results from two towns: Town A (60% vegetarian adoption) experienced a 12% per-capita emissions reduction,... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (compute the average of two percentages) is fused into the main textual reasoning task, forcing the solver to separate the numeric calculation from the argumentative support judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understa... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet delivers complete nutrition and can provide health benefits.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet delivers complete nutrition and can provide health benefits.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine.
Separate independent sub-problem (completely unrelated ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a second claim + perspective) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two evaluations and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Statement: Given the claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Given the perspective: In addition to health benefits, a vegetarian diet also gives you everything your body needs. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the correct option: (A) Supports (B) Undermines | A | Statement: Given the claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Given the perspective: In addition to health benefits, a vegetarian diet also gives you everything your body needs. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the correct option: (A) Supports (B) Undermines. Separately (independe... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question about whether the perspective makes an environmental claim is fused into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estima... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Complete nutrition and health benefits can be had with a vegetarian diet. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Complete nutrition and health benefits can be had with a vegetarian diet. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately (as an independent sub-question), indicate whether the perspective's central sentence "Complete nutrition an... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective sentence as empirical vs. value claim) was fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two questions and not let the secondary classification alter the main support/undermine judgment."... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegetarian diet promotes a healthy weight. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegetarian diet promotes a healthy weight. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.
Separately (unrelated): Statement: Claim: Everyone should reduce sugar intake. Perspective: Reducing su... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent claim-and-perspective pair was added alongside the original one, forcing the solver to separate two similar sub-problems and avoid conflating their evidence.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increas... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Healthy weight can be achieved with a vegetarian diet. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Healthy weight can be achieved with a vegetarian diet. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately (as an independent sub-task that should not affect the main judgment), evaluate the following related proposition and state ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (evaluation of a separate proposition about soy allergies and vegetarian diets) was fused into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid conflating their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understan... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet contributes to a healthy weight.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
Solution: A | A | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: A vegetarian diet contributes to a healthy weight.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
Separate task (independent): A small observational study reports that a... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent descriptive-statistics sub-problem is fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the second task influence the judgment about whether the perspective supports the claim.",
"name": "Com... |
Problem: Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegetarian diet helps build healthy bones because vegetarians absorb more calcium than meat eaters. Choose the best option: (A) Suppor... | A | Problem: Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegetarian diet helps build healthy bones because vegetarians absorb more calcium than meat eaters. As a separate task, decide whether... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent true/false geometry sub-problem into the same prompt so the solver must separate two different reasoning tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the extra independent qu... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Vegetarian diets allow more calcium to be absorbed than from meat and leads to healthy bones.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting... | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Vegetarian diets allow more calcium to be absorbed than from meat and leads to healthy bones.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent judgment (a true/false sub-claim about leafy greens containing vitamin C) into the main task so the solver must separate the two sub-problems and not conflate them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffi... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Meat is the most convenient protein source available.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Optio... | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Meat is the most convenient protein source available.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Optio... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "A second, independent but structurally similar sub-problem (analogy about commuting) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two problems and reason about the original claim without being misled by the added sub-problem.",
"n... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian
Perspective: Meat is the most readily available protein
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) N/A
(D) N/A
(E) N/A
(F) N/A
(G) N/A
(H) N/A
(I) N/A
(J) N/A | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian
Perspective: Meat is the most readily available protein
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) N/A
(D) N/A
(E) N/A
(F) N/A
(G) N/A
(H) N/A
(I) N/A
(J) N/A
Separately (unrelated sub-task): Evaluat... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent, separate nutrition true/false sub-question about whether tofu is a complete protein into the original entailment-style judgment, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the sub-question affect the main claim evaluation."... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Most find that meat is a very convenient source of protein. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Both (D) Neither | B | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Most find that meat is a very convenient source of protein. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Both (D) Neither
Separate question (independent): In a survey of 50 people, 60% say they prefer meat because it'... | B (Undermines). Separate question answer: 30. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (survey percentage to count) was fused into the original argument-analysis question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the simple math distract from the main inference.",
"name": "Compos... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: It will facilitate world food distribution. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: It will facilitate world food distribution. Additionally, as a separate question, state whether the statement "A square is a rectangle" is true or false. | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent true/false sub-problem (about geometry) is fused into the main evaluative task, requiring the solver to separate the two problems and answer the main one without being distracted by the extra part.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Meat consumption should be reduced, but does NOT need to be eradicated. Options: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) both supports and undermines (D) neutral or irrelevant (E... | A | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Meat consumption should be reduced, but does NOT need to be eradicated. Options: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) both supports and undermines (D) neutral or irrelevant (E... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-question (area of a rectangle) was fused into the main classification task so the solver must separate and solve two independent subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": ... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegan diet would not be practical in most parts of the world. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: A vegan diet would not be practical in most parts of the world. Unrelated sub-problem (for separate consideration): Suppose three regions have 60%, 70%, and 80% of households that cannot reliably obtain plant-based staples; if the regions have equal populati... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the text so the solver must separate the incidental calculation from the main textual judgment task.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — the... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: A 'wall' on the shared USA and Mexico border would be ineffective. Perspective: At the very least it slows people down. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: A 'wall' on the shared USA and Mexico border would be ineffective. Perspective: At the very least it slows people down. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately (and unrelated to the main question), as a side task count the... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (counting words and stating parity) is fused into the original instruction, requiring the solver to separate the side task from the main entailment judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim using this rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: The Mona... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim using this rule: if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: The Mona... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated analytic sub-problem (character-count comparison) is fused into the original classification task so a solver must separate and mentally manage two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: The Monarchy system is biased and inefficient.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim | A | Statement: Claim 1: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: The Monarchy system is biased and inefficient.
Additionally, evaluate the following independent sub-claim using the same perspective. Claim 2: Britain should retain the monarchy only for ceremonial/traditional purposes. (This is a separate evaluation ... | Claim 1: A
Claim 2: B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate claim about keeping a ceremonial monarchy) was fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two evaluations and answer each independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estim... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use 'support' if the perspective could convince someone with a different view, otherwise use 'undermine'. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Regressive and biased is how the Monarchy ... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use 'support' if the perspective could convince someone with a different view, otherwise use 'undermine'. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Regressive and biased is how the Monarchy ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent grammaticality judgment sub-question is fused into the original entailment task, forcing the solver to separate two different subtasks (inference + grammarcheck).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_in... |
Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: The Monarchy contrasts the meaning of Democracy.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise, it is undermining. Answer with a s... | support | Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: The Monarchy contrasts the meaning of Democracy.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise, it is undermining. Answer with a s... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical subtask (a syllogism validity check) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate and handle two different reasoning tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "mod... |
Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: It is costing the tax payers money which could be better spent | support | Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: It is costing the tax payers money which could be better spent. Separately, for the purposes of a quick numerical illustration (this is an independent sub-question and does not affect the m... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent numeric sub-problem (per-household cost calculation) into the main argumentative judgement task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Statement: Given the claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. And the perspective: Tax payers money could be spent more appropriately. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine | support | Statement: Given the claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. And the perspective: Tax payers money could be spent more appropriately. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, unrelated sub-problem that appears in the same debate, consider the perspective: "Scrapping the monar... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a second perspective about tourism revenue) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two evaluations and answer only the original task.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: The taxpayers are the ones losing out on money that could be spent properly. Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: The taxpayers are the ones losing out on money that could be spent properly. Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines
Separate (independent) task — distractor: Independently classify... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent secondary sub-question is fused into the problem, requiring the solver to separate and answer two distinct tasks (main claim-support judgement and a classification of the perspective).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"e... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: tax payers money is valuable. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: tax payers money is valuable. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Additionally, as a separate and independent sub-task, indicate wh... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (checking spelling/grammar of the perspective phrase) is fused into the main task so the solver must separate the two tasks and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficult... |
Statement: Given the claim: "Britain should scrap the monarchy." and the perspective: "tax payers money should be useful only to the public", decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Reply with exactly one of the words: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Given the claim: "Britain should scrap the monarchy." and the perspective: "tax payers money should be useful only to the public", decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent subtask, indicate whether the perspective statement is normative or descriptive (th... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent subtask (classify the perspective as normative vs descriptive) into the main problem so the solver must separate and handle two distinct judgments.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": ... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Monarchy is a child's creation. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Monarchy is a child's creation. Answer with either support or undermine. Separately, and unrelated to the main evaluation, determine whether the following syllogism is logicall... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical-validity subtask (a syllogism judgment) is fused into the instruction so the solver must separate and solve two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — mid... |
Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: Monarchy is just childish.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Both supports and undermines the claim
(D) Neither supports nor undermines th... | A | Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: Monarchy is just childish.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Both supports and undermines the claim
(D) Neither supports nor undermines th... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify whether the phrase is an ad hominem vs institutional critique) is fused into the original question, forcing the solver to separate and answer two analyses independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Monarchy is an infantile idea. | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Monarchy is an infantile idea. Additionally, as a separate task, determine whether the word "infantile" contains an odd or even number of letters... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (parity of letter count) is fused into the main instruction so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the auxiliary task affect the core judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffi... |
Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: it is high time to scrap monarchy. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim | A | Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: it is high time to scrap monarchy. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent sub-question, indicate whether the perspective expres... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (classify urgency vs. descriptive) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid letting the added classification alter the original support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional unde... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy
Perspective: monarchy in britain led to lots of chaos in the past
Answer with a single word: support or undermine
Solution: support | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy
Perspective: monarchy in britain led to lots of chaos in the past
As a separate, independent task (do not let this affect your main judgment), classify the sentence "monarchy in britain led to lots ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective sentence as fact vs. opinion) was fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two independent items.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Most other countries in Europe have abandoned the monarch. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Most other countries in Europe have abandoned the monarch. (Separately, as an independent sub-task, consider whether the sentence "Most other countries in Europe have abandoned the monarch" is an empirical claim or a value judgment; you do not need to re... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent small classification task (is the perspective empirical or normative?) is fused into the prompt, forcing the solver to separate that sub-problem from the main support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: The head of state should be a position that is separate ... | B | Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: The head of state should be a position that is separate ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent secondary claim is fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two sub-problems and evaluate them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the extra, re... |
Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Politics should not include the head of the state as in a monarchy. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choices: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: Politics should not include the head of the state as in a monarchy. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choices: (A) supports (B) undermines. As an independent administrative subtask (unrelated to the argument), suppose a ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent combinatorics sub-problem (selecting co-chairs from a panel) is fused into the original argument-classification task, requiring separation of two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "... |
Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: There should be a separation from the head of state and politics. Respond with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy. Perspective: There should be a separation from the head of state and politics. Separately, as an independent subtask, classify whether the example "The prime minister sits in the legislature" illustrate... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify an example as separation or fusion of powers) was fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid mixing answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimate... |
Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: There is no divine right to leadership or privilege.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Use 'support' if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, otherwise use 'undermine'. Answer with a single wo... | support | Statement: Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: There is no divine right to leadership or privilege.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Use 'support' if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, otherwise use 'undermine'. Answer with a single wo... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent second judgement task (a separate claim/perspective pair) is fused into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate the two sub-problems and answer the correct one.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Statement: Given the claim and a perspective below, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine.
Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: Leadership and privilege are not divine rights. | support | Statement: Given the claim and a perspective below, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine.
Claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
Perspective: Leadership and privilege are not divine rights.
Separately, and unrelated to the judgment ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent grammatical-analysis subtask (a yes/no question about whether the perspective sentence contains an adjective modifying a noun) into the main judgment task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two unrelated problems.",
"name": "... |
Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paying housewives for their work is an important form of economic empowerment. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Support (B) Undermine (C) Neutral/No clear stance | A | Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paying housewives for their work is an important form of economic empowerment. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Support (B) Undermine (C) Neutral/No clear stance. Additionally, as a separate evaluation (independ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate true/false/undetermined evaluation) was fused into the original question so the solver must separate the two tasks and answer each independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Being paid as a housewife is economically empowering.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. | A | Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Being paid as a housewife is economically empowering.
Separate sub-task (independent): Classify the following independent statement as either an "empirical claim" or a "value judgment": "Paying housewives would increase household bargaining power.... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task was fused into the main prompt so the solver must separate the tasks (classify a sentence as empirical vs. value) from the primary support/undermine evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"e... |
Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paid housewives have a better economic power. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single lowercase word: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paid housewives have a better economic power. As a separate sub-problem, consider whether paying housewives would necessarily increase recorded household income or change national GDP accounting or labor force participation — this is an independen... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem about macroeconomic effects (recorded household income, GDP accounting, labor force participation) was fused into the original judgment task so the solver must separate the main normative inference from the unrelated economic question... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Payment and obligation works differently in public and in private. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Payment and obligation works differently in public and in private. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, independent sub-task included here, also judge whether t... | Main task: undermine. Separate sub-task (grammaticality): ungrammatical. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent grammaticality-judgment sub-task into the original inference task, requiring the solver to parse and answer two unrelated questions in one prompt.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "... |
Statement: Given the claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. And the perspective: Payments would be more difficult to quantify in private transactions. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Given the claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. And the perspective: Payments would be more difficult to quantify in private transactions. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. Also, as a separate and independent task (do not let ... | undermine; For the unrelated syllogism: cannot be concluded. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent syllogistic reasoning task was fused into the original question so the solver must separate and solve two distinct problems rather than treating them as one combined inference.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: It would be too inconvenient to make payments to housewives. Choose the best answer: (A) The perspective supports the claim (B) The perspe... | B | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: It would be too inconvenient to make payments to housewives. As a separate, unrelated task, if housewives were paid $200 per week for thei... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (compute annual pay from a weekly wage) was fused into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and ignore the added calculation when deciding the claim/perspective relation.",
"name": ... |
Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Paying housewives is financially impractical.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Paying housewives is financially impractical.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(Separate, independent sub-problem - do not let this change the main judgment): Classify... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task (is the perspective empirical/practical or moral/normative) is fused into the original supports/undermines judgment, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional unders... |
Statement: Given the claim: 'Housewives should be paid for their work.' and the perspective: 'Paying housewives would be inconvenient', determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Given the claim: 'Housewives should be paid for their work.' and the perspective: 'Paying housewives would be inconvenient', determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent sub-problem (do not let this affect your primary judgment), classify the perspective s... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the type of objection and count words) is fused into the main inference task, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paying housewives would be difficult to achieve in the real world. Choose the best answer from the options below: (A) supports (B) undermi... | B | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paying housewives would be difficult to achieve in the real world. Choose the best answer from the options below: (A) supports (B) undermi... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fuses an independent arithmetic sub-problem (budget calculation) into the main textual inference task so the solver must separate and solve them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate... |
Statement: Determine whether the given perspective supports or undermines the claim. Return exactly one of the words: support or undermine.
Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Housewives are entitled to pay | support | Statement: Determine whether the given perspective supports or undermines the claim. Return exactly one of the words: support or undermine.
Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Housewives are entitled to pay
Additionally, as a separate task, compute the following independent value: if 4 housewi... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the original classification task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct tasks: label the perspective and compute a numeric total.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Women who are housewives should be paid
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, label it support; otherwise label it undermine. Answer must be eithe... | support | Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Women who are housewives should be paid
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, label it support; otherwise label it undermine. Answer must be eithe... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as normative vs empirical) is fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate and answer both parts correctly.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Statement: Given the claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paying housewives reduces social mobility. Respond with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Given the claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: Paying housewives reduces social mobility. As an independent subtask (not part of the main label), classify the unrelated sentence "Paid compensati... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An unrelated classification subtask was fused into the prompt, requiring the reader to separate the main binary support/undermine decision from an independent causal-vs-correlational judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimate... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Housewives would lack incentives to find better paying, more fulfilling work.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best single option from the list below.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Bot... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Housewives would lack incentives to find better paying, more fulfilling work.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best single option from the list below.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Bot... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (estimating monthly monetary value of housework) was fused into the main evaluative task, requiring the solver to separate the evaluation of the perspective from the numeric calculation.",
"name": "Compositional under... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Paying housewives would give them less incentives to find better conditions.
Options: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither supports nor undermi... | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Paying housewives would give them less incentives to find better conditions.
Additionally, as a separate, unrelated side question: if 120 people were polled about paying housewive... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (a poll-count question) is fused into the main argumentative classification task, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mo... |
Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Paying housewives promotes more positive images of women and family life.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim | A | Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Paying housewives promotes more positive images of women and family life.
Additionally, as a separate policy-detail sub-problem, suppose a government proposes a payment of $12,000 per year to each housewife and plans to levy a flat 10% tax on that... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent arithmetic sub-problem (tax calculation) into the original rhetorical evaluation so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid letting the numeric sub-problem influence the support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional un... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: When a housewife is paid, they have a better stand in society. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work. Perspective: When a housewife is paid, they have a better stand in society. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines
Separately, consider the following independent pa... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent second claim-perspective pair is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two problems and answer only the original one.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — likely t... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Being paid as a housewife promotes more positive images.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.
Solution: support | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
Perspective: Being paid as a housewife promotes more positive images. (As an independent, extra sub-task: for classification only, indicate whether the sentence "Being paid as a housewife promotes more positive images." reads more like an empirical cl... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the sentence as empirical claim vs. opinion) was fused into the main task so the solver must separate the two tasks and ignore the auxiliary classification when deciding support/undermine.",
"name": "Compositional unde... |
Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Fair use can be misused. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Fair use can be misused. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines. Separately, as an independent subtask, decide whether ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (identify whether a sentence is a slippery slope fallacy) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.