original_problem stringlengths 162 931 | original_solution stringclasses 6
values | augmented_problem stringlengths 281 1.35k | augmented_solution stringclasses 68
values | distractor_metadata dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. 'Supports' means the perspective could convince someone that the claim is true; 'Undermines' means it argues against the claim. Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Junk food can hinder the br... | ['support'] | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. 'Supports' means the perspective could convince someone that the claim is true; 'Undermines' means it argues against the claim. Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Junk food can hinder the br... | ['support'] | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask is fused into the main instruction so a model must separate the two tasks (deciding support/undermine vs. fact/opinion) and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Brain function is inhibited by unhealthy foods. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Brain function is inhibited by unhealthy foods. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, unrelated subtask (do not let this affect your judgment on the main task), decide whether... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask is fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the unrelated sub-problem from the main inference about claim-perspective support.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_d... |
Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Banning Junk Food In Schools Could Decrease The Frequency Of Heart Disease. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Banning Junk Food In Schools Could Decrease The Frequency Of Heart Disease. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine.
(Compositional subtask — unrelated and to be solved separately): Given th... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical-entailment sub-problem is fused into the original judgement task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two different problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Heart disease can be caused by junk food. Choose the best option: (A) supports (B) undermines | A | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Heart disease can be caused by junk food. Additionally, if a school has 400 students and 25% buy junk food daily, how many students buy junk food? Choose the best option: (A) supports (B) under... | A. The perspective supports the claim. (Additional sub-problem answer: 25% of 400 = 100 students.) | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (percentage of students buying junk food) was fused into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_... |
Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools.
Perspective: The frequency of heart disease in schools could be lowered by banning junk food.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with either support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools.
Perspective: The frequency of heart disease in schools could be lowered by banning junk food.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with either support or undermine. As a separate, independent sub-problem (do not let this affect your judgment... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (compute 30% of 1,200) is fused into the original entailment question, forcing the solver to separate tasks and avoid letting the unrelated calculation influence the main inference.",
"name": "Compositional understand... |
Statement: Given the claim Ban junk food from schools. and the perspective Junk Food Can Have Negative Affects On Bone Health, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine | support | Statement: Given the claim Ban junk food from schools. and the perspective Junk Food Can Have Negative Affects On Bone Health, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Additionally, independently evaluate whether the perspective Sugary Drinks Contribute To Childhood Obesity supports or underm... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, structurally similar sub-problem about sugary drinks and a separate school policy is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and focus only on the requested output.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Eating junk food can be detrimental to bone health. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools. Perspective: Eating junk food can be detrimental to bone health. Separately, and as an independent micro-task, classify the following short sentence as a factual claim or an opinion: "Junk food contains large amounts of added sugars." Determine whether the perspect... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (classify a short sentence as factual or opinion) into the main problem so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools.
Perspective: Junk food has been associated with poor bone health.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines | A | Statement: Claim: Ban junk food from schools.
Perspective: Junk food has been associated with poor bone health.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
Also consider the following independent sub-problem that is related to student health time allocation. S... | Original: A; Distractor sub-problem: A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent multiple-choice sub-problem about tutoring and GPA is fused after the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two reasoning chains.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moder... |
Statement: Claim: Throw Russia out of the G8. Perspective: The biggest action the west can take without sanctions. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: Throw Russia out of the G8. Perspective: The biggest action the west can take without sanctions. Additionally, as an independent thought exercise, consider this separate pair (do not include its answer in your response): Statement B: Claim: Suspend Russia from major international sporting events. Pers... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate claim/perspective pair about sporting suspensions) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and reason about two distinct items.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Throw Russia out of the G8. Perspective: Simply narrows the G8 making it irrelevant. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Throw Russia out of the G8. Perspective: Simply narrows the G8 making it irrelevant. Separately, as an unrelated subtask, decide whether the sentence 'The G8 originally had eight members.' is a factual statement or an opinion. Determine whether the perspective ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fuses an independent classification sub-problem (fact vs. opinion) into the main entailment task so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate... |
Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: It is hypocritical and will not benefit civilians.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: It is hypocritical and will not benefit civilians.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine.
(Separate task — in one word, label the sentence 'The Earth revolves around the Sun' as... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "A separate, independent classification sub-task was appended to the original problem, requiring the solver to identify and separate two different tasks before answering.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Innocent people are always going to be a factor in arming a police force. | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Innocent people are always going to be a factor in arming a police force.
Also, as a separate and unrelated task (do not let this affect your ju... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent supports/undermines judgement is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate and evaluate two similar but independent pairs.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate ... |
Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: When the police are armed, mistakes will lead to innocent people getting shot. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: When the police are armed, mistakes will lead to innocent people getting shot. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Separate (independent) mini-question: Claim B: Regular firearms training for officers reduces accidental shoo... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, related mini-question (Claim B / Perspective B) is fused into the original item so the solver must separate and answer two sub-problems independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "m... |
Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Arming the police will cause an escalation in criminal violence. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Both supports and undermines (D) Neither suppo... | B | Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Arming the police will cause an escalation in criminal violence. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. (Separately, as an independent subtask, evaluate the distinct viewpoint: 'Arming the police reduces police response time' ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (evaluate a different viewpoint about response time) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate and answer the original judgement while ignoring or separately handling the added evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional und... |
Statement: Given the claim: "Arming the police is a good idea." And the perspective: "Policing is a dangerous job. Police officers should be allowed to arm themselves" Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Given the claim: "Arming the police is a good idea." And the perspective: "Policing is a dangerous job. Police officers should be allowed to arm themselves" Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately (and not as part of the support/undermine judgment), classify whether the... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classification of moral justification type) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate tasks and avoid conflating the two.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increas... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: If the police are not armed, only the bad guys will have guns. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: If the police are not armed, only the bad guys will have guns. Separately, and unrelated to the evaluation above, determine whether the following sentence is expressing a causal claim: 'L... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify whether a sentence expresses a causal claim) was fused into the original task so the solver must separate and solve two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: An armed police force will deter criminal behaviour.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option from the list below.
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both supports and undermines
(D) neither supports nor undermine... | A | Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: An armed police force will deter criminal behaviour. Separately, suppose a public survey reports that 70% of respondents believe that increasing police force presence reduces crime; does that survey result by itself prove that arming police will reduce cr... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a survey-causation question) was fused into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating survey evidence with the logical relation between perspective and claim.",
"name": "Composition... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Arming the police makes communities feel safer. | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Arming the police makes communities feel safer. Separately, for an administrative check, if a precinct has 12 officers and each officer is issued ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about equipment issuance is fused into the textual judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two sub-problems and avoid letting the arithmetic distract from the classification.",
"name": "Compositional under... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: Everyone saw the extent of damage caused several years ago when the Hollywood, CA police department was completely outgunned. The police had to break into a gun store to get better fire power. Many lives could have been saved if they had the pro... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: Everyone saw the extent of damage caused several years ago when the Hollywood, CA police department was completely outgunned. The police had to break into a gun store to get better fire power. Many lives could have been saved if they had the pro... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent arithmetic subtask (logistics calculation about magazines/rounds) into the main evaluation prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: Arming the police is a necessary step.
Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: Arming the police is a necessary step.
Separately, as an independent exercise, determine whether the following claim and perspective supp... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (a second claim/perspective pair about street lighting) into the original classification task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two independent relations.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estim... |
Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: It is never a good idea when the police force is out gunned by the criminals.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines | A | Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: It is never a good idea when the police force is out gunned by the criminals.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
Separate, independent sub-problem (unrelated to the support/undermine que... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical sub-problem about badges is fused into the main question so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated logic question influence the main judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated... |
Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: One of the first principals of defense is to have superior resources.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of the words: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: One of the first principals of defense is to have superior resources.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of the words: support or undermine.
As a separate, independent subtask (unrelated to your main... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (computing the remainder when 37 officers are divided into 6 shifts) is fused into the political/inferential task, forcing the solver to separate and handle two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understandin... |
Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: The police should be equipped to react to contemporary social problems.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
Solution: A | A | Statement: Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: The police should be equipped to react to contemporary social problems.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
Independent sub-problem (unrelated to the answer above): Claim 2: Police s... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, related sub-problem (about body cameras and de-escalation training) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the two questions and not let the extra task change the judgment on the original claim.",
"name": "Compositional... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine.
Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: Arming the police does not deal with the causes underlying violence | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine.
Claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
Perspective: Arming the police does not deal with the causes underlying violence
---
Additional (independent) ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent arithmetic truth-evaluation subtask into the original natural language inference task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two unrelated problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Statement: Claim: "Arming the police is a good idea." Perspective: "Just because police have weapons, it doesn't mean the main issues of violence are being dealt with." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A) through (J).
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
... | B | Statement: Claim: "Arming the police is a good idea." Perspective: "Just because police have weapons, it doesn't mean the main issues of violence are being dealt with." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A) through (J).
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent empirical evaluation subtask was fused into the original judgement task, forcing the solver to separate two problems and avoid letting the independent judgement influence the main inference.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
]... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help. Choose the best option from (A) through (J). Options: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) neutral or unr... | B | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help. Additionally, as a separate subtask, determine whether the number of words in the perspective sentence is odd or even. C... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated subtask (counting parity of words in the perspective) is fused into the instruction so the solver must separate two tasks and avoid letting the extra task influence the core judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Arming the police will do more harm than good. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer exactly one word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: Arming the police will do more harm than good. As an additional independent subtask (do not include this in your final answer), classify whether the perspective is primarily an empirical prediction or a moral judgm... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs. moral) into the original task so the solver must separate the two subtasks and avoid letting the added classification affect the required single-word output.",
"name": "Compositio... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Science can determine human values.
Perspective: Science can't produce faith.
Choose exactly one of: support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Science can determine human values.
Perspective: Science can't produce faith.
Choose exactly one of: support or undermine. Also, as a separate and independent task (do not let this influence yo... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, additional sub-problem is fused into the main instruction so the solver must separate two tasks and avoid letting the extra task influence the original support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estim... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science can produce practical solutions and propose new policies to improve overall happiness. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either sup... | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science can produce practical solutions and propose new policies to improve overall happiness. Additionally, as an independent subtask, classify which ethical framework this perspective... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the ethical framework) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the secondary classification alter the original support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional un... |
Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science can measure and analyse the effect of certain moral behaviour on others. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science can measure and analyse the effect of certain moral behaviour on others. As a separate, independent task, also decide whether the following logical statement is valid: 'If all A ar... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical-validity sub-problem is fused into the main classification task, forcing the solver to separate two independent reasoning processes.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — r... |
Statement: Claim: Science can determine human values.
Perspective: Science shouldn't be prescribing what we do.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Science can determine human values.
Perspective: Science shouldn't be prescribing what we do.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. (Separately — as an independent sub-problem that should not change the above judgement — classify whet... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (empirical vs. normative) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and answer the main judgement independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Reply with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science can't have a spiritual aspect. | undermine | Statement: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Reply with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science can't have a spiritual aspect. Separately (as an independent sub-problem), also decide whether the perspective supports or undermine... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent secondary judgement is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid conflating their conclusions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — increases chanc... |
Statement: Claim: Science can determine human values.
Perspective: Spirituality has no place in science.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both supports and undermines
(D) neither supports nor undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Science can determine human values.
Perspective: Spirituality has no place in science.
Separate sub-problem (independent): In a small survey, 2 out of 5 participants preferred scientific explanations to spiritual ones — what percentage is that?
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the c... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (computing a percentage from 2/5) is fused into the main philosophical question, forcing a model to separate and solve two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_inc... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science and spirituality do not go hand in hand. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Science can determine human values. Perspective: Science and spirituality do not go hand in hand. As a separate, independent sub-task, briefly classify the perspective as primarily an empirical claim, a normative claim, or a... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task (empirical/normative/metaphysical) is fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two related but distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated... |
Statement: Given the following claim and perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this decision rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is support; otherwise it is undermine. Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. P... | undermine | Statement: Given the following claim and perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this decision rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is support; otherwise it is undermine. As an independent sub-problem (do not let this affect your ma... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent syntactic sub-problem (voice identification) is fused into the task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two independent questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — likel... |
Statement: Given the claim: "Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned." and the perspective: "The police cannot enforce the law." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Given the claim: "Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned." and the perspective: "The police cannot enforce the law." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate and independent task (do not conflate with the judgment above), evaluate the unrelated empirical ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent empirical sub-problem was fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate the normative/support judgment from an independent factual evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficult... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Regulating arranged marriages in EU countries would be impossible. Based on this claim and perspective, state whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Regulating arranged marriages in EU countries would be impossible. Based on this claim and perspective, state whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Additionally, indicate whether the sentence "Arranged marriages in E... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fuses an independent sub-problem (grammatical/semantic classification of the claim sentence) into the main reasoning task, requiring the solver to split attention and solve two separate subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estim... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: It would be impossible to enforce a ban on arranged marriages in EU countries. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Supports (B) Undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: It would be impossible to enforce a ban on arranged marriages in EU countries. Separately (independent subtask): For annotation purposes only, classify the sentence "Arranged marriages should be banned" as either a factual claim or a va... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask was fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and answer two distinct tasks (main support/undermine judgment and a sentence-type classification) independently.",
"name": "Compositional understandin... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine | ['undermine'] | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine.
As a separate, independent sub-problem (do not let it ... | ['undermine'] | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic question was fused into the main prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated sub-problem influence the main inference.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Perspective: The state should not regulate such personal matters.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option (A) through (J):
(A) Strongly supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Weakly supports the clai... | B | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Separately consider an unrelated example: Statement 2: The EU should ban smoking in all public places. Perspective 2: Personal liberty should be preserved even if it allows harmful behavior. Question 2: Does Perspective 2 support or undermine Statem... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, similarly formatted sub-problem (about banning smoking and personal liberty) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and focus on the original claim.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimate... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Personal matters should not be regulated by the state. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Personal matters should not be regulated by the state. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Additionally, consider a separate evaluation: Statement 2: 'Sex education in schools should be mandatory.' Pe... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a second statement and perspective about sex education and public health) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate two parallel evaluations and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Perspective: Arranged marriages remains a personal choices and as such shouldn't be banned by the state.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the single best answer from the options below.
Options:
(A)... | B | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Perspective: Arranged marriages remains a personal choices and as such shouldn't be banned by the state.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the single best answer from the options below. As a separat... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-task (word count of the Perspective sentence) was fused into the main classification problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the auxiliary task influence the main judgement.",
"name": "Compositional und... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Perspective: It will cause resentment and make certain communities feel targeted.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned.
Perspective: It will cause resentment and make certain communities feel targeted.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines
Separately, identify whether the sentence "It will cause resent... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (classify the sentence as empirical vs. normative) into the main problem so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": ... |
Problem: Statement: Given the claim: "Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned." And the perspective: "To ban arranged marriages in EU countries would initiate resentment from certain communities." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Problem: Statement: Given the claim: "Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned." And the perspective: "To ban arranged marriages in EU countries would initiate resentment from certain communities." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent sub-problem, ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (rhetorical type) is fused into the main inference task, forcing the solver to separate and handle two different problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Several communities in EU countries would feel targeted and begin to resent authorities should arranged marriages be banned. Based on this perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? | undermine | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Several communities in EU countries would feel targeted and begin to resent authorities should arranged marriages be banned. Based on this perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Separately, as an unrelated exercise, classi... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-problem was fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the tasks (determine support/undermine vs. classify the type of claim).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Integration and the acceptance of Western values are important. Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) both supports and u... | A | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Integration and the acceptance of Western values are important. Separately, indicate whether this perspective primarily reflects 'individualist' or 'collectivi... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-question (about whether the perspective is 'individualist' or 'collectivist') into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate and handle two sub-problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"e... |
Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Th... | support | Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Th... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (counting how many states adopt in year two given totals) was fused into the original classification task, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_... |
Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Forced marriage is a barrier to integration. Based on the claim and the perspective, choose whether the perspective supports, undermines, or is neutral toward the claim. Select one option. | A | Statement: Claim: Arranged marriages in EU countries should be banned. Perspective: Forced marriage is a barrier to integration. Based on the claim and the perspective, choose whether the perspective supports, undermines, or is neutral toward the claim. Select one option. Additionally, as a separate task (do not let it... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify a short sentence as factual vs. normative) was fused into the original judgment task so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid letting the secondary task influence the primary inference.",
"name": "Compositio... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: Life after death is strongly stated in the bible. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: Life after death is strongly stated in the bible. Additionally, as a separate and independent sub-task (unrelated to the claim evaluation), indicate whether the perspective sentence 'Life after ... | support; active voice | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (grammatical voice classification) is fused into the main judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and solve them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_inc... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: The bible states that there is life after death. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: The bible states that there is life after death. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine. Separately, as an independent subtask, indicate whether... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (appeal-to-authority yes/no) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "M... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: There is with certainty a Heaven and Hell. Choose the best option from (A) through (J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) neutral (D) both supports and undermines (E) contradicts (F) irrelevant (G... | A | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: There is with certainty a Heaven and Hell. Also, independently, decide whether this perspective implies moral reward or punishment after death (answer Yes or No). Choose the best option from (A)... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (about moral reward/punishment) was fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mod... |
Statement: Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: There is a Heaven and there is a Hell. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Neutral or unrelated (D) Both supports and undermines (E) Inconclusive (F) Depe... | A | Statement: Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: There is a Heaven and there is a Hell. Additionally, as an independent subtask, count the number of words in the Perspective sentence ('There is a Heaven and there is a Hell.') and report it; this subtask is unrelated to the claim evaluation. Determine whether t... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent side-task (counting words) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — introduces an extra i... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: yes there is a heaven and a hell. Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim | A | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: yes there is a heaven and a hell. Also, as a separate question, determine whether the syllogism 'All birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore penguins can fly.' is valid or invalid. Choose t... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a syllogism validity check) was fused into the original task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated sub-question affect the main classification.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: My strong belief is that Heaven and Hell exist. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: My strong belief is that Heaven and Hell exist. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, as an unrelated sub-problem that must be considered independently: Statement: All swans are white. Perspective: I have observ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (about swans) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the new sub-problem change the judgment on the original claim.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: There definitely exists a Heaven and Hell. Options: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim | A | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: There is life after death. Perspective: There definitely exists a Heaven and Hell. Options: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim. Separately, classify whether the perspective's assertion about Heaven and Hell is best charac... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-question (empirical vs. metaphysical) was fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two distinct items.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: The right to drink should have a higher age of initiation because of the dangers posed by drinking. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Reply with exactly one word: support or undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: The right to drink should have a higher age of initiation because of the dangers posed by drinking. Also consider whether age limits should differ by beverage type (for example, allowing beer at 18 but keeping spirits a... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem about whether age limits should vary by beverage type into the main question, forcing the solver to separate two lines of reasoning.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "mo... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: The American public overwhelmingly supports MLDA 21. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option from (A) through (J). (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Neutral (D) Both supports and ... | B | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: The American public overwhelmingly supports MLDA 21. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option from (A) through (J). (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Neutral (D) Both supports and ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent arithmetic sub-problem (computing a poll percentage) into the main semantic inference task so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid letting the numeric subtask affect the claim-vs-perspective judgment.",
"name": "Compositio... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Lowering the drinking age will invite more use of illicit drugs among 18-21 year olds.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option from (A) through (J).
(A) Supports
(B) Undermi... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Lowering the drinking age will invite more use of illicit drugs among 18-21 year olds.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option from (A) through (J).
(A) Supports
(B) Undermi... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (identify whether the perspective commits a logical fallacy) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: State governments should have the right to establish a lower legal dr... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: State governments should have the right to establish a lower legal dr... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent subtask (classify a sentence as factual or normative) was fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid letting the unrelated classification affect the primary judgement.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 to 18 will irresponsibly allow a greater segment of the population to drink alcohol in bars and nightclubs, which are not safe environments.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose ... | B | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 to 18 will irresponsibly allow a greater segment of the population to drink alcohol in bars and nightclubs, which are not safe environments. (Separately, as an independent thought experiment: in a town of 1,000 ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (a population/counting thought experiment) is fused into the argument text, forcing the solver to separate the unrelated numeric task from the main argumentative evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering the drinking age would allow younger people to go to more unsafe places. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering the drinking age would allow younger people to go to more unsafe places. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, answer this independent mini-question (unrelated to the drinking a... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An unrelated sub-problem (about high school start times) is fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate two independent inference tasks and avoid conflating their evidence.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: MLDA 21 helps prevent underage binge drinking. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with one word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: MLDA 21 helps prevent underage binge drinking. As a separate task (do not conflate with the main question), indicate whether the following factual claim is true or false: 'The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 establishe... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "A separate, independent factual judgement about the National Minimum Drinking Age Act is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks (main argumentative relation vs. the factual true/false subtask).",
"name": "Compositional understandi... |
Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: they drink anyway why not let them do it legaly
Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting;... | A | Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: they drink anyway why not let them do it legaly
Also, as a side, unrelated question: if a bookstore has 13 copies of a book and sells 5, how many... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem is fused into the main classification task so the solver must separate and solve two unrelated tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate. Mid-tier models ma... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: MLDA 21 is largely ineffective because teens consume regardless.
Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim | A | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: MLDA 21 is largely ineffective because teens consume regardless.
Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
As a separate, independent exercise, d... | Main question answer: A (supports the claim).
Additional question answer: True (the deductive form is valid). | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent logical-validity sub-problem into the original question so the solver must separate the two tasks and not conflate them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the extra, plau... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Kids will drink when they want, making it legal will reduce petty crimes. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Kids will drink when they want, making it legal will reduce petty crimes. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. Separately (independent sub-problem): If a... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the evaluation of the argument from a separate numerical calculation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficu... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Kids aren't waiting until 21 now, they already don't care about the law. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (the perspective provides reasons that favor ... | A | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Kids aren't waiting until 21 now, they already don't care about the law. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate sub-problem (answer independently of the main choice), also decide whethe... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs. normative) is fused into the main classification task, forcing the solver to separate two analyses.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Allowing 18- to 20-year-olds to drink alcohol in regulated environments with supervision would decrease unsafe drinking activity. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) N... | A | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Allowing 18- to 20-year-olds to drink alcohol in regulated environments with supervision would decrease unsafe drinking activity. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) N... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic/survey sub-problem was fused into the main natural language inference task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mo... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: The MLDA should stay at 21 because people tend to be more mature and responsible at 21 than 18. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: The MLDA should stay at 21 because people tend to be more mature and responsible at 21 than 18. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately (as an independent subtask), indicate whether the perspe... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent secondary classification task (empirical vs moral justification) is fused into the original judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the two subproblems and not conflate their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 would be medically irresponsible. Based on this perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermine | B | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 would be medically irresponsible. Based on this perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermine. Additionally, as an independent subtask, classify whether the statemen... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (normative vs. descriptive) is fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the additional classification change the support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering the drinking age is a bad idea. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A-J): (A) The perspective supports the claim (B) The perspective undermines the claim (C) The ... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering the drinking age is a bad idea. Additionally, as a separate subtask, indicate whether the sentence 'Lowering the drinking age is a bad idea.' expresses an opinion or a factual claim. Decide whether the perspect... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the sentence as opinion vs. fact) is fused into the main entailment-style judgment, forcing the solver to separate two tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moder... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: MLDA 21 exerts valuable social pressure on potential underage drinkers and those who may serve them.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use the following options and definitions:
(A) sup... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: MLDA 21 exerts valuable social pressure on potential underage drinkers and those who may serve them.
(Separately, in an independent subtask) Additionally, state whether the sentence "MLDA 21 exerts valuable social press... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (empirical vs normative) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two subtasks and not let the added judgment interfere with the main support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Composition... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 would give high schoolers and even middle schoolers easier access to alcohol. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C)... | B | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 would give high schoolers and even middle schoolers easier access to alcohol. As an unrelated side exercise, if three schools reported increases in underage access of 5%, 7%, and 9% respectively, what is the ave... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numeric sub-problem (computing an average percentage) is fused into the original argument-evaluation task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and ignore the irrelevant arithmetic when determining the stance relation.",
"name": "... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 would be good for the economy. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering MLDA 21 would be good for the economy. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Separately (independent sub-problem): If lowering the MLDA increased annual alcohol sales by 8% and current an... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numeric sub-problem (a simple tax-revenue calculation) is fused into the main prompt so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid letting the calculation influence the main claim-evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: MLDA 18 is not a right.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) Support
(B) Undermine | B | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: MLDA 18 is not a right.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one:
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
As an additional, separate detail mentioned in the same article, a survey footnote reports that 1,200 ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (computing 35% of 1,200) is fused into the original judgement task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two different problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: It is not a right to drink when you are 18 years old.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one word: support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: It is not a right to drink when you are 18 years old.
In a separate, unrelated sub-problem, consider this: Claim B: The voting age should be 18. Perspective B: 18-year-olds have sufficient civic understanding to vote. Decide fo... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, parallel judgment about a different age-related claim (voting age) was inserted so a model must separate the two sub-problems and not conflate them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mod... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: There are fewer drunk driving traffic accidents and fatalities in many countries with MLDA of 18. Based on this perspective, choose the option that best describes whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: There are fewer drunk driving traffic accidents and fatalities in many countries with MLDA of 18. Based on this perspective, choose the option that best describes whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (percent reduction) was fused into the main evaluative problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Young adults drinking could cause more problems in the future.
Solution: undermine | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Young adults drinking could cause more problems in the future. Additionally, in a separate judgment, classify the perspective itself as either an 'emp... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as 'empirical' or 'normative') was fused into the main task, forcing the solver to separate the two subtasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: If you can fight for your country in Iraq, why can't you have a beer?
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Both suppo... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: If you can fight for your country in Iraq, why can't you have a beer?
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Both suppo... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent but analogous sub-problem about lowering the voting age to 16 was appended, requiring the solver to separate the two evaluations and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase"... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated math verification task is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate two tasks and avoid letting the added subtask influence the claim evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: The drinking age should be 21 years of age.
Choose the best option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neutral / No clear effect... | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: The drinking age should be 21 years of age.
Choose the best option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neutral / No clear effect... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about survey counts is fused into the main classification task, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: 21 years old should be the drinking age. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: 21 years old should be the drinking age. Separately (this is an independent sub-problem and should not be used to answer the main question), indicate ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent true/false sub-problem was fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the unrelated subtask from the primary supports/undermines judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: People can not be allowed to drink until they are 21.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Neutral or unrelated | B | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: People can not be allowed to drink until they are 21.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Neutral or unrelated
Additionally, eval... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, similarly-structured sub-problem (about seatbelt laws) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Young adults in college won't get in trouble with the law. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Young adults in college won't get in trouble with the law. Answer with either support or undermine. As a separate and independent task, indicate wheth... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent factual-entailment subtask was fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the added classification affect the original support/undermine judgement.",
"name": "Compositional understandin... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering the age will cut down on young adults drinking. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Lowering the age will cut down on young adults drinking. Separately, decide whether the premise 'All mammals are warm-blooded' entails the hypothesis 'Dolphins are warm-blooded.' (This is an independent sub-problem and does not ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical inference sub-problem was fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate two reasoning chains and avoid cross-contamination.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase"... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Lowering the age to drink will make it less interesting since everyone can do it.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
(C) Both support and undermine
(D) Neither
(E) N... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Lowering the age to drink will make it less interesting since everyone can do it.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
(C) Both support and undermine
(D) Neither
(E) N... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent, self-contained sub-problem (a separate claim/perspective pair about driving age) into the original problem so the solver must separate the two problems and ignore the unrelated one when answering the original question.",
"name": "Com... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Use reverse psychology on kids to remove the appeal of drinking.
Question: Does the perspective support or ... | A | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: Use reverse psychology on kids to remove the appeal of drinking. Separately, as an independent sub-question,... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-task was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate two tasks: (1) judge support/undermine and (2) label the tactic as a behavioral nudge or legal reform.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: If you can drive a lethal weapon (moterized vehicle) why cant you drink?
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Solution: support | support | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age.
Perspective: If you can drive a lethal weapon (moterized vehicle) why cant you drink?
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Separate (independent) task: Classify the argumentative technique used in the perspective—p... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the rhetorical technique and identify any factual claim needing evidence) is fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understandin... |
Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: you can vote at 18 why cant you drink? Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | A | Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: you can vote at 18 why cant you drink? Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines
Separate, unrelated task (do not conflate with the main question): In a student counc... | A
Explanation: The perspective presents the argument that 18-year-olds have the civic responsibility of voting, so they should also be allowed to drink — this supports the claim. (The separate election fraction task is independent and does not change this conclusion.) | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (a simple fraction computation about a student council vote) is fused into the prompt so a solver must separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated computation affect the main inference.",
"name": "Compositional u... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Being an adult at 18 should be all encompassing across society, including drinking. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Solution: support | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: The drinking age should be lowered from 21 to a younger age. Perspective: Being an adult at 18 should be all encompassing across society, including drinking. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, an unrelated poll of 1,000 respondents reported that 58... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a simple polling math question) is fused into the main verbal reasoning task, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diff... |
Statement: Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: College football should replace the bowl championship series (BCS). Perspective: The proposed playoff system alternatives are actually less fair than the BCS system in place. Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) un... | B | Statement: Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: College football should replace the bowl championship series (BCS). Perspective: The proposed playoff system alternatives are actually less fair than the BCS system in place. Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) un... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, separate sub-problem (a simple fraction-simplification math question) is fused into the main classification task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_... |
Statement: Claim: College football should replace the bowl championship series (BCS). Perspective: The BCS rankings are designed to favor consistency over the course of the entire season. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: College football should replace the bowl championship series (BCS). Perspective: The BCS rankings are designed to favor consistency over the course of the entire season. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines
Separately, as an independ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a win-percentage comparison) was fused into the original prompt so a solver must separate the two tasks and not let the side calculation affect the main judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_... |
Statement: Claim: College football should replace the bowl championship series (BCS). Perspective: A playoff system would not mean the end of the BCS rankings, which could still be used to determine the top 4, 8, 12, or 16 teams, depending on how many playoff games are feasible. Question: Does the perspective support o... | support | Statement: Claim: College football should replace the bowl championship series (BCS). Perspective: A playoff system would not mean the end of the BCS rankings, which could still be used to determine the top 4, 8, 12, or 16 teams, depending on how many playoff games are feasible. Question: Does the perspective support o... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (counting games in an 8-team single-elimination bracket) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and solve two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increas... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised.
Perspective: In addition to our first argument: There is no legal bar on the purchase of alcoholic drink and cigarettes, though both are often addictive.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised.
Perspective: In addition to our first argument: There is no legal bar on the purchase of alcoholic drink and cigarettes, though both are often addictive. As a separate exercise, consider this unrelated logical sub-problem: is the statement "If all A are B, ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logical sub-problem was fused into the original question so the solver must separate two tasks: evaluate the perspective about drug decriminalisation and independently assess a logic validity problem.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. Perspective: In addition to our fourth argument: Decriminilisation of drugs will diminish organised crime. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. Perspective: In addition to our fourth argument: Decriminilisation of drugs will diminish organised crime. Also, there is a separate pair to consider (independent exercise): Statement: Local councils should legalise street vending. Perspective: Legalisation... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, similarly formatted sub-problem (a separate statement/perspective pair about street vending) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two pairs and not conflate them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Given the claim: "All drugs should be decriminalised." and the perspective: "Decriminilisation of drugs will diminish organised crime" determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. (A) Supports (B) Undermines | A | Statement: Given the claim: "All drugs should be decriminalised." and the perspective: "Decriminilisation of drugs will diminish organised crime" determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. (A) Supports (B) Undermines. Separately, decide whether decriminalisation is equivalent to legalization (Y... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (Is decriminalisation equivalent to legalization?) was fused into the main judgement task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two distinct questions rather than only assessing support/undermine.",
"name": "Compositional u... |
Statement: Given the claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. And the perspective: In addition to our third argument: Individuals should be free to do whatever they like with themselves as long as this harms no one else. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? | support | Statement: Given the claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. And the perspective: In addition to our third argument: Individuals should be free to do whatever they like with themselves as long as this harms no one else. MAIN QUESTION: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Separate, independent task (... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent but thematically related sub-question (about abolishing taxation) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the secondary task influence the main verdict.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. Perspective: Individuals should be free to do whatever they like with themselves as long as this harms no one else. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. Perspective: Individuals should be free to do whatever they like with themselves as long as this harms no one else. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, independent sub-problem, also assess whether the same pers... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (about employer drug-testing) was fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the tasks and avoid conflating their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "m... |
Statement: Task: Given a claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Pensions should be privatised.
Perspective: Government pension schemes are not a viable or sustainable option.
Options:
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
Choose the single best option. | A | Statement: Task: Given a claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Pensions should be privatised.
Perspective: Government pension schemes are not a viable or sustainable option.
Options:
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
Choose the single best option.... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent multiple-choice arithmetic/number-theory subtask (prime identification) was fused into the original inference task, requiring the solver to separate and solve both tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"e... |
Statement: Using the rule: if a perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Pensions should be privatised. Perspective: senior citizens should not and cannot be exposed to such naked risk on moral grounds. Decide whether the perspective suppor... | undermine | Statement: Using the rule: if a perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Pensions should be privatised. Perspective: senior citizens should not and cannot be exposed to such naked risk on moral grounds. Decide whether the perspective suppor... | Main task: undermine. Explanation: The perspective argues that exposing senior citizens to the risks of privatised pensions is morally unacceptable, which opposes the claim that pensions should be privatised and so would not convince someone who favors privatisation. Mini-task (separate): undermine. Explanation: The pe... | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, separate sub-problem (another claim/perspective classification) was fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the extra sub-problem interfere with the original judgment.",
"name": "Compositional ... |
Statement: Claim: Pensions should be privatised.
Perspective: Private Enterprise is more suited to long-term planning and sustainability.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. | A | Statement: Claim: Pensions should be privatised.
Perspective: Private Enterprise is more suited to long-term planning and sustainability.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
Also, for context consider this additional numerical question about pension returns: suppose a... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numerical sub-problem (doubling-time calculation) is fused into the original evaluative task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two different questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.