Split (1)

train · 1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

original_problem stringlengths 162 931	original_solution stringclasses 6 values	augmented_problem stringlengths 281 1.35k	augmented_solution stringclasses 68 values	distractor_metadata dict
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Socialism is Dead. Perspective: Capitalism is less secure than socialist systems. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of the words support or undermine	undermine	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: Socialism is Dead. Perspective: Capitalism is less secure than socialist systems. Separately, as an independent sub-problem, determine (mentally) whether the sentence "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" is a pangram (contains every letter of the Engli...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a pangram check) was fused into the prompt so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — increases chance of con...
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: It is a moral imperative to constantly seek to expand the boundaries of knowledge. Use this rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, ...	support	Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: It is a moral imperative to constantly seek to expand the boundaries of knowledge. Additionally, separately (do not include this in your single-word answer), classify the p...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification subtask (normative vs descriptive) was fused into the original judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the two decisions.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderat...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: State-sponsored space programs can utilize the infrastructure built up in the last half-century, and therefore be substantially cheaper. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the single best option from (A) through (J)...	A	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: State-sponsored space programs can utilize the infrastructure built up in the last half-century, and therefore be substantially cheaper. Separately, as an independent aside: suppose an uncrewed mission that previously cost $100 million can reduce its...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent numerical sub-problem (cost reduction calculation) was fused into the main reasoning problem, requiring separation of tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate. Mid-tier models ma...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Space exploration leads to technological advancement. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Space exploration leads to technological advancement. For additional context, a separate and independent pair is provided: Claim B: Urban gardening reduces food insecurity. Perspective B: Community gardens increase local food access. Determine whethe...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a second claim-perspective pair about urban gardening) was fused into the original problem to force the solver to separate and reason about two independent items and focus on the correct one.", "name": "Compositional understand...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Space exploration takes resources away from more worthy causes. Choose the best option: (A) The perspective supports the claim (B) The perspecti...	B	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Space exploration takes resources away from more worthy causes. Choose the best option: (A) The perspective supports the claim (B) The perspecti...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent grammatical classification subtask is fused into the main judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two subtasks and not conflate them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat...
Statement: Task: Given a claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the single best option letter. Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: there are other issues to worry about. Options: (A) strongly supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C)...	B	Statement: Task: Given a claim and a perspective, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Additionally, as a separate subtask, indicate whether the perspective expresses a prioritization/resource-allocation concern or a factual denial (this is an independent classification and does not change t...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent subtask (classify whether the perspective is about prioritization vs factual denial) is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve two classifications independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" }...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: The cost of space exploration exceeds the positive benefits. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: The cost of space exploration exceeds the positive benefits. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine. Separately, for an unrelated sub-problem, decide whether the perspective supports ...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent (claim, perspective) pair is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the secondary judgment interfere with the primary decision.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_d...
Statement: Given the claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. And the perspective: Space exploration is too expensive to have many positive benefits. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: Given the claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. And the perspective: Space exploration is too expensive to have many positive benefits. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine. Separately, as an independent subtask (do not let this ...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Fused an independent subtask (classify the sentence as empirical or value judgment) into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_i...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: While there are some benefits, space exploration has too high a cost. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Support (B) Undermine	B	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: While there are some benefits, space exploration has too high a cost. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Support (B) Undermine Additionally, independently determine whether the perspective is primarily an evaluative j...	Main question: B (Undermine). Additional classification: C (Evaluative).	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-question (classify the perspective as evaluative or factual) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and answer both independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estima...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: The 'space race' fuels nationalistic sentiment and antagonism. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option: (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: The 'space race' fuels nationalistic sentiment and antagonism. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option: (A) supports (B) undermines. Additionally, as a separate and independent task, indicate whether th...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-question (tone classification) is fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and reason about each independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase":...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Nationalistic sentiment and antagonism are fueled by the 'space race.' Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Nationalistic sentiment and antagonism are fueled by the 'space race.' As a separate aside, the author also asks whether calling space efforts a 'race' in this context primarily denotes competitive rivalry rather than collaborative scientific endeavo...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (interpreting whether 'space race' implies competition vs. collaboration) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate two inferences.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Nationalistic sentiment (and antagonism) is powered by the space race. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine	undermine	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Nationalistic sentiment (and antagonism) is powered by the space race. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, as an independent subtask, classify the sentence "National pride often motivates space policy" as d...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification subtask is fused into the prompt so the model must separate and solve two tasks (main support/undermine judgment and a descriptive/normative classification) rather than treating them as one.", "name": "Compositional understan...
Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Space exploration has improved communications on Earth. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?	support	Statement: Claim: It is crucial to explore the universe. Perspective: Space exploration has improved communications on Earth. For additional context (an independent aside often mentioned in policy briefs), consider a separate calculation: if three newly launched communication satellites each enable 7 additional indepen...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (satellite channel count) is fused into the main argumentative task, forcing the solver to separate the two problems.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — i...
Statement: Given the claim: "The International Criminal Court is a force for good." and the perspective: "The ICC does not have enough checks on prosecutorial powers, inviting prosecutorial abuse." Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports...	B	Statement: Given the claim: "The International Criminal Court is a force for good." and the perspective: "The ICC does not have enough checks on prosecutorial powers, inviting prosecutorial abuse." Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, separate sub-problem (a second claim/perspective pair) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and not conflate their judgments.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The prosecutorial abuse potential is high, due to its lack of checks on its power. Solution: undermine	undermine	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The prosecutorial abuse potential is high, due to its lack of checks on its power. Separately, as an unrelated subta...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent claim/perspective pair is fused into the problem so the solver must separate the two subproblems and focus only on the original pair.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — likely t...
Problem: Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC needs more checks on its prosecutorial authority in order preclude abuse of power. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both (D) neither (E) ...	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC needs more checks on its prosecutorial authority in order preclude abuse of power. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both (D) neither (E) ...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as normative or descriptive) into the original problem so the solver must separate two tasks and not let the second task affect the main judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ]...
Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC is not democratic in nature and is likely to be used as a political tool by powerful nations. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) nei...	B	Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC is not democratic in nature and is likely to be used as a political tool by powerful nations. Separately, indicate which single issue the perspective most directly addresses (choose one): (1) democratic legitimacy, (2) politica...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification sub-task (choosing which issue the perspective addresses) is fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "es...
Problem: Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The EU has a high potential to be used as a political ploy as it is not known for its democracy. Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Options: (A) Supports (B) Undermines	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The EU has a high potential to be used as a political ploy as it is not known for its democracy. Separately (independent task): Classify the phrase 'not known for its democracy' as primarily an objective factual assertion or a...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification sub-task (fact vs. opinion) was fused into the main political evaluation so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the auxiliary task change the main judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], ...
Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC is mainly not a democratic institution, thereby allowing for political malfeasance. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC is mainly not a democratic institution, thereby allowing for political malfeasance. Separately, as an independent task, indicate whether this perspective is primarily an empirical claim about the court's institutional structure...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification task was fused into the original prompt, forcing the solver to separate and answer two different questions (the original support/undermine judgment and a separate empirical vs. normative classification).", "name": "Compositio...
Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC interferes with national operations (both military and humanitarian) because of how loosely the Rome Statue can be interpreted. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option below. (A) Support...	B	Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC interferes with national operations (both military and humanitarian) because of how loosely the Rome Statue can be interpreted. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option below. (A) Support...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent factual sub-question is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently (evaluate the perspective vs. evaluate a historical true/false fact).", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "es...
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC impedes a nation's core operations as as Rome Statue is not rigid in its interpretation. Choose the best option ...	B	Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC impedes a nation's core operations as as Rome Statue is not rigid in its interpretation. Choose the best option ...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent simple arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the main semantic judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the unrelated subtask influence the main decision.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ...
Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The Rome Statute of the ICC hinders national operations due to its wide flexibility. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	undermine	Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The Rome Statute of the ICC hinders national operations due to its wide flexibility. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Additionally, as a separate annotation task (do not conflate with the main evaluat...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a linguistic classification of voice) is fused into the main reasoning task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct tasks and avoid conflating their analyses.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated...
Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC infringes upon national sovereignty by inherently implying that there is a higher court nations must answer to. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. Options: (A) Supports (B) Un...	B	Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC infringes upon national sovereignty by inherently implying that there is a higher court nations must answer to. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. Options: (A) Supports (B) Un...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, separate sub-question about ratification and sovereign immunity is fused into the original evaluation task, requiring the solver to separate the two problems and avoid letting the secondary question influence the main judgment.", "name": "...
Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC's criminal court marginalizes individual national courts. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Claim: The International Criminal Court is a force for good. Perspective: The ICC's criminal court marginalizes individual national courts. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines Separately (unrelated sub-problem): Classify the following senten...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification sub-question is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate two tasks (evaluating the perspective vs. classifying a sentence) and avoid letting the unrelated sub-problem influence the main judgment.", "name": "Com...
Statement: Given the claim: "The International Criminal Court is a force for good." and the perspective: "The ICC messes up national independence by marginalizing individual member courts.", determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	undermine	Statement: Given the claim: "The International Criminal Court is a force for good." and the perspective: "The ICC messes up national independence by marginalizing individual member courts.", determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate subtask (for record-keeping), also state whethe...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, unrelated subtask (word-count parity) was fused into the main problem so a solver must separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them when deciding support vs. undermine.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_di...
Statement: Claim: Governments Should Pay Compensation For Terrorist Atrocities Carried Out By Their Citizens. Perspective: Set up an international fund to pay compensation. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) support (B) undermine	A	Statement: Claim: Governments Should Pay Compensation For Terrorist Atrocities Carried Out By Their Citizens. Perspective: Set up an international fund to pay compensation. (As an unrelated administrative note for archiving, indicate whether the perspective sentence 'Set up an international fund to pay compensation.' c...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a word-count parity check) is fused into the main question so the model must separate the tasks and not let the unrelated subtask affect the main inference.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_diffic...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Governments Should Pay Compensation For Terrorist Atrocities Carried Out By Their Citizens. Perspective: Governments in countries where terrorism is prevalent should allocate tax dollars to a pool to compensate nations that have been victims. Question: Does the perspective support or undermin...	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: Governments Should Pay Compensation For Terrorist Atrocities Carried Out By Their Citizens. Perspective: Governments in countries where terrorism is prevalent should allocate tax dollars to a pool to compensate nations that have been victims. Separate sub-problem (unrelated to the support/und...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent quantitative sub-problem was fused into the original classification task so the solver must separate the two problems and not let the numeric task distract from the main support/undermine judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" ...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Governments Should Pay Compensation For Terrorist Atrocities Carried Out By Their Citizens. Perspective: The UN should allocate a fund to compensate nations that have been victims of terrorism.	support	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Governments Should Pay Compensation For Terrorist Atrocities Carried Out By Their Citizens. Perspective: The UN should allocate a fund to compensate nations that have been victims of terrorism. (Separately, and as an independent subta...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (identify the rhetorical device) was fused into the main task so a solver must separate the two tasks and not conflate their answers.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Policing and financing the system is unmanageable. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Both supports and undermines (D) Not enough information	B	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Policing and financing the system is unmanageable. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Both supports and undermines (D) Not enough information Separately, as an independent sub-...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (resource planning for polling stations) was fused into the text so the solver must separate the classification task about the claim from the unrelated numeric calculation.", "name": "Compositional understanding" ...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It would be extremely difficult to police and finance mandatory voting. Choose the best option from (A) through (J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) Both supports and undermines (D) Neithe...	B	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It would be extremely difficult to police and finance mandatory voting. Separately, as a completely independent operational question, suppose a small district runs 12 polling stations for ...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about polling-station payroll is fused into the original stance-classification task, forcing models to separate and solve two problems.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increa...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It is unreasonable to expect that compulsory voting could be financed and verified. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. Options: (A) Strongly support (B) Undermine (C) Support (D) Neutral (E) Contradict (F...	B	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It is unreasonable to expect that compulsory voting could be financed and verified. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. Options: (A) Strongly support (B) Undermine (C) Support (D) Neutral (E) Contradict (F...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Appended an independent logistical/mathematical sub-problem (a staff/time verification calculation) that must be separated from the main textual-entailment judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mo...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Voting is a civic duty. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option letter. (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Both supports and undermines the claim (D) Irrelevant or neutral	A	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Voting is a civic duty. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option letter. (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim (C) Both supports and undermines the claim (D) Irrelevant or neutral Separately, evaluate...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (classifying a sentence as empirical vs normative) is appended to the main task so the solver must separate and solve two unrelated tasks instead of only the original one.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "es...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: A true democratic mandate for the government. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: A true democratic mandate for the government. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. Additionally, as a separate mini-task, classify the rhetorical appeal of the slogan "The people have ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (classify a rhetorical appeal) is fused into the main political-judgment task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two different problems within one prompt.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Voting is the duty of every individual in a democratic society. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Voting is the duty of every individual in a democratic society. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. Additionally, as a separate exercise, consider this unrelated claim: Claim B: Publ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate claim and perspective about public libraries) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and reason about them independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "es...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It is the duty of every citizen to vote. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine	support	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It is the duty of every citizen to vote. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately (as an independent subtask), decide whether the sentence 'Recycling should be mandatory for all residents.' is a normative or descriptiv...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification subtask (normative vs descriptive) was fused into the instructions so the solver must separate the two tasks and ignore the extra classification when producing the single-word output.", "name": "Compositional understanding" ...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: There are alternatives that tackle the real causes of voter disengagement. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: There are alternatives that tackle the real causes of voter disengagement. (Separate task) Statement B: Claim: Lowering the voting age to 16 would increase youth turnout. Perspective B: Introducing mandatory school-based civics classes aims to improve youn...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent secondary sub-problem (Claim B / Perspective B) is fused into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct questions.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mode...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Compulsory voting broadens representation of disadvantaged groups. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option from A through J. Options: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) both supports a...	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Compulsory voting broadens representation of disadvantaged groups. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option from A through J. Options: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) both supports a...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent numeric sub-problem about turnout change was fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the policy-evaluation task from the arithmetic task.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Disadvantage groups are better represented when voting in mandatory. Choose one option: (A) Support (B) Undermine	A	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: Disadvantage groups are better represented when voting in mandatory. Choose one option: (A) Support (B) Undermine. Separately, consider this independe...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent numerical sub-problem about voter turnout was fused into the classification task, requiring the solver to separate the classification judgment from the arithmetic calculation.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: By making voting mandatory, disadvantaged groups improve their representation. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim	A	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: By making voting mandatory, disadvantaged groups improve their representation. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim Separate question (independent): In a city with 10,00...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the main evaluation task, requiring the solver to separate two tasks (political evaluation and numeric calculation) and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estim...
Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It will cause more people to become interested in politics. Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option from (A) through (J). Options: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither supports n...	A	Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory. Perspective: It will cause more people to become interested in politics. Question: Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option from (A) through (J). Options: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither supports n...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, related sub-problem (about lowering the voting age to 16) is fused into the original item so the solver must separate the two problems and not let the second influence the answer to the first.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ...