HaptalAI's picture
Add leaderboard table to README, include human operator row
5189a0f verified
---
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
- robotics
- tabular-classification
tags:
- robotics
- failure-detection
- robot-training-data
- annotation-quality
- manipulation
pretty_name: Haptal Robotics Failure Benchmark v1.0
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
---
# Haptal Robotics Failure Benchmark v1.0
The first public benchmark for robot training data annotation quality and failure detection in manipulation episodes.
## What this is
A held-out test set of 600 robot episodes across 6 failure classes generated from real LeRobot trajectories with physics-based failure injection. The test set is fixed. Anyone can evaluate their annotation pipeline against it and get a comparable score.
## Why it exists
No standardized benchmark currently exists for robot training data annotation quality. Open X-Embodiment, BridgeData V2, DROID and LeRobot are dataset collections. None measure annotation quality or failure detection accuracy. We built this to fill that gap.
## Failure classes
| Class | Description |
|---|---|
| `grasp_slip` | Grip force drops causing object slip |
| `nominal` | Successful episode, no failure |
| `overcorrect` | Post-failure panic response |
| `stuck_joint` | Motor stall or joint lock |
| `trajectory_deviation` | Drift from intended path |
| `velocity_spike` | Sudden joint velocity anomaly |
## Dataset splits
| Split | Episodes |
|---|---|
| Train | 2,400 |
| Test (fixed) | 600 |
## Leaderboard
| Rank | Model | Accuracy | Macro F1 | Cohen's κ | OOD F1 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | Haptal (multi-dataset RF) | **93.6%** | **0.937** | **0.923** | **0.907** | **0.030** |
| — | Human operator (pass/fail only)* | 83.1% | — | 0.661 | — | — |
| — | Majority baseline | 53.1% | — | 0.000 | — | — |
\* Human operators provide binary pass/fail only — no failure type, no timestep.
Submit your model → `aarav@haptal.ai` · see `leaderboard.json` for full entry details.
## Haptal baseline results
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| In-distribution accuracy | 93.6% |
| OOD accuracy (unseen robot) | 90.8% |
| Generalization gap | 0.03 |
| Macro F1 | 0.937 |
| Cohen's Kappa | 0.923 |
| Weakest class F1 | 0.887 (grasp_slip) |
## How to use
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("haptal-ai/robotics-failure-benchmark")
train = dataset["train"]
test = dataset["test"]
```
## How to score your model
1. Run your model on the test split
2. Save predictions as a CSV with columns `episode_id` and `predicted_class`
3. Run `python score.py your_predictions.csv`
4. Email results to [aarav@haptal.ai](mailto:aarav@haptal.ai) to be added to the leaderboard
## Base datasets
Generated from real robot trajectories across multiple platforms:
- `lerobot/pusht`
- `lerobot/xarm_lift_medium_replay`
- `lerobot/xarm_push_medium_replay`
- `lerobot/aloha_sim_transfer_cube_human`
## License
Apache 2.0. Base trajectories from LeRobot (MIT license).
## Citation
```bibtex
@dataset{haptal2026rfb,
title = {Haptal Robotics Failure Benchmark v1.0},
author = {Bedi, Aarav},
year = {2026},
publisher = {HuggingFace},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/haptal-ai/robotics-failure-benchmark}
}
```
## Contact
[aarav@haptal.ai](mailto:aarav@haptal.ai)
[haptal.ai](https://haptal.ai)