archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
fuzzynyanko
null
I'll have to try this in Java later.
null
0
1315801246
False
0
c2j7rgu
t3_kchtc
null
t1_c2j7rgu
t3_kchtc
null
1427588713
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
batasrki
null
You mean, google engineer led HTML 5 spec?
null
0
1315801337
False
0
c2j7rvf
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j7rvf
t1_c2j78gi
null
1427588718
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
shawnturner
null
TFS seems to be as useful as the people who actually understand how it works. I do believe its true many companies pay a firm to set it up, and then noone is left who actually knows how it works beyond checking in and out. As a developer, It's one more system to at least partially learn. It would be implementation specific to determine if it's good or bad for a given project. I strongly disliked it at first. The more time I'm forced to use it, the more productive it seems to be. Funny how that works.
null
0
1315801365
False
0
c2j7rzb
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2j7rzb
t3_kc5di
null
1427588719
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cdsmith
null
Feel free to start such a thing. Seriously, Google is spending a lot of money on this in return for about $0 in extra advertising revenue versus someone else doing a good job of it for them. I'm sure they'd *love* it if someone else stepped up and created a good well-designed toolable and efficient replacement for JavaScript, and got other browser vendors to buy in. The problem is, no one else has done so, and so Google is working on it. Maybe they will succeed and maybe not (note they call it a high risk project), but at least someone is trying.
null
0
1315801581
False
0
c2j7swj
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j7swj
t1_c2j7q0k
null
1427588730
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
xiongchiamiov
null
Once upon a time, this guy named Zed Shaw wrote a rant. It was a rant about the Ruby on Rails community, and it was called "Rails is a Ghetto". He was pretty harsh on people, and perhaps a bit unfair, but Zed's a master at ranting - even if you know he's going overboard, it's entertaining to read. Then Some Random Guy decided to write a blog post about some various things he finds annoying about Erlang. Now, since everyone has things they find annoying about a language, he had to make sure that people paid attention to his complaints. "A ha!", he thought. "I can use a title that reminds people of that infamous Zed Shaw rant. That'll reel them in!" Unfortunately, proggit saw through his disguise. No upvotes for you, little man.
null
0
1315801662
False
0
c2j7t92
t3_kcpdg
null
t1_c2j7t92
t3_kcpdg
null
1427588734
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
throwaway-o
null
Correct.
null
0
1315801721
False
0
c2j7ti0
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j7ti0
t1_c2j5h2h
null
1427588737
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cdsmith
null
That's too bad... I use Chromium because I can't stand the bright colors in the Chrome icon (I know, silly reasons...) but I'd honestly enable the data collection if they asked for it. I'm always happy to provide information that helps software vendors who give me free cool stuff.
null
0
1315801748
False
0
c2j7tmc
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j7tmc
t1_c2j5qze
null
1427588750
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315801787
False
0
c2j7tsl
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j7tsl
t1_c2j596o
null
1427588745
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hiffy
null
> a deliberate design decision Yeah, I read something somewhere by mathowie to that affect. I tend to disagree with the outcome – any popular thread very quickly degenerates in offtopic discussions regardless. Unfortunately for me, I derive a lot of value from the comments, but in their current state browsing through them exacts a large opportunity cost. I honestly think that reddit-style (… I guess slashdot inspired) threading is a whole paradigm shift in forum UI. It's not perfect, but it definitely allows for any given thread to scale much more efficiently. In both systems the first ten or twenty people to comment dominate the discussion but in reddit land all I have to do is click "[-]" and blop! I can keep browsing other discussion branches without trying to figure who is replying to what, etc. ---- ON THE OTHER HAND, reddit *does* discourage longer posts.
null
0
1315801808
False
0
c2j7tvm
t3_kajta
null
t1_c2j7tvm
t1_c2j5bi7
null
1427588747
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
It's like reading a memo from MS 10 years ago.
null
0
1315802242
False
0
c2j7vtf
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j7vtf
t1_c2j4fex
null
1427588775
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hiffy
null
> Bytecode representations for high-level languages tend to be tied to the semantics of a given language. Can you give me examples? Turing machines being turing machines and all that. I would happily accept native support for another prototype based dynamic language without as many warts.
null
0
1315802498
False
0
c2j7x00
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j7x00
t1_c2j6fmu
null
1427588788
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
thcobbs
null
>Google is spending a lot of money on this in return for about $0 in extra advertising revenue Bullshit. They collect every search, click, etc and turn it in targeted adverts. >I'm sure they'd love it if someone else stepped up and created a good well-designed toolable and efficient replacement for JavaScript No they wouldn't because it would compete with them > The problem is, no one else has done so, and so Google is working on it. For their own profit. Imagine if this wasn't google, but instead MSoft or Apple... The reddit community would be up in arms and damn near riot.
null
0
1315802553
False
0
c2j7x8f
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j7x8f
t1_c2j7swj
null
1427588790
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SuperGrade
null
Confession: I have yet to read every word in this PDF but will get around to it. . . . What I find interesting is that they seek to define "complexity". While everyone will agree that that negative word is bad, I've had the troubling experience of seeing arguments where opposing sides claim they are avoiding it. For example, they mention state and code volume/duplication as sources of complexity. Yet cut-paste coding and state are staples of many who call themselves programmers - and I have had them invoke the term "complexity" against the tools or techniques to the contrary. "Why you make it so complicated - just cut-paste it 6 times." or "Why you make it complicated, just use global mutable variable."
null
0
1315802660
False
0
c2j7xom
t3_kc6bw
null
t1_c2j7xom
t3_kc6bw
null
1427588795
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
albertzeyer
null
Related code: https://github.com/albertz/chromehacking
null
0
1315802710
False
0
c2j7xvd
t3_kcqvs
null
t1_c2j7xvd
t3_kcqvs
null
1427588796
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hiffy
null
>Word processing? Text editing? Image editing? Software development? Playing text adventures? Reading books? Managing a music library? Whenever I do any of these things I use a native application. Sure — there are web-based alternatives — but they come up severely short with respect to functionality and are, for the most part, relatively niche. Bullshit. >Word processing? Text editing? You could pass college easily without ever using Word. > Image editing? For 90% of users we're there already. > Software development? Talk about niche activities > Playing text adventures? Reading books? Managing a music library? Have you played [telehack](http://telehack.com/)? Did you know there's a Kindle web client now? I've met a number of people who basically only use Grooveshark and Youtube for music. > I simply can’t imagine anything with respect to which a web app would be more functional — on my iPhone or on my desktop — than a native app. For anything not computation heavy (i.e. 90% of your non gaming activities) we're *almost* there as it is in both iPhones and desktops. In five years, you'll be able to get away with writing immensely complicated and responsive javascript apps. It's just so clearly *the future*, and it will be here hella fast.
null
0
1315802931
False
0
c2j7ysf
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j7ysf
t1_c2j4z0k
null
1427588806
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kampangptlk
null
Meh, you should see asian elevators then. Asian building must not contain number 4, so there's no 4, 13, 14, and so on.
null
0
1315802934
False
0
c2j7ysu
t3_kbdgw
null
t1_c2j7ysu
t1_c2j1p6m
null
1427588807
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kcin
null
Well, I find the Eclipse interface clumsy, I'm an Emacs guy, so if it allows me to combine the advanced language support of Eclipse with the power of the Emacs interface then it's the best of both worlds for me.
null
0
1315803083
False
0
c2j7zhh
t3_kbz68
null
t1_c2j7zhh
t1_c2j4f0v
null
1427588825
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315803244
False
0
c2j806b
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j806b
t1_c2j4k7z
null
1427588830
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cdsmith
null
You don't seem to have understood anything I said. Google doesn't make any more money if the JavaScript alternative is the one they designed versus the one someone else defined. They don't make any more money if you click an ad in Firefox than if you click it in Chrome. Your economic model is wrong. Google isn't selling Chrome, and they aren't selling a programming language. They are selling advertising on the web, and their goal here is to get more people using the web. They have no reason to care whether people are using Chrome or Dash or whatever to do it. They make those things for just one reason: by making people's experience more pleasant on the web, people are less likely to welcome closed, proprietary applications like iOS apps that compete against the web (and where Google has far less advertiser market share). I don't even know how to respond to that last bit. Actually, there are plenty of times when Microsoft or Apple have implemented a new web technology, it turned out to be helpful, and people have encouraged its implementation in other web browsers, too, and the web has benefited greatly from it. For example, AJAX came about that way. A lot of the current JavaScript event model and modern CSS came about that way. No one dislikes these things just because they were originally implemented as proprietary extensions by single web browser vendors.
null
0
1315803491
False
0
c2j814m
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j814m
t1_c2j7x8f
null
1427588841
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
greendude
null
there's a good chance that if you believe that, that you don't really know what open source is. look up precisely the differences between GPL and Apache. AOSP is open source, but not copyleft.
null
0
1315803679
False
0
c2j81vj
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j81vj
t1_c2j6psq
null
1427588848
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315803949
False
0
c2j82zk
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2j82zk
t1_c2j3lpl
null
1427588862
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
fatnino
null
today i updated firefox on one of my neglected machines. when it started again, firefox said that flash was out of date, pretty standard fare. then the link it provided to get flash from had a check box (prechecked) to also install a side of chrome with your flash order. ಠ_ಠ
null
0
1315804312
False
0
c2j84ff
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j84ff
t1_c2j4vut
null
1427588881
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
xpda
null
Quicksilver?
null
0
1315804314
False
0
c2j84fp
t3_kc0k4
null
t1_c2j84fp
t1_c2j1pk7
null
1427588881
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
vagif
null
It's funny (and telling) how a language that tries to avoid success at all costs (haskell) is at #35 while language that tries (too hard) to be successful lingers at #50. Scala's main target is java programmers. And it is clear by now, that java programmers largely did not swallow the bait. Heck even here on reddit, r/scala has only 1600 subscribers whereas haskell more than 7000. Even r/clojure (abomination in the eyes of java programmers with its lisp syntax) has more subscribers.
null
0
1315804335
False
0
c2j84io
t3_kaxjq
null
t1_c2j84io
t1_c2iud6l
null
1427588883
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
there have been bugs which persisted for months. which version of IE is questionable, during what timeframes also, but the fact remains: i don't if it work in ie9 but not in ie8. it should work in all. i develop sites that are backward compatible across all 5 browsers, several versions... it's just people who like to use the latest features of the spec, some of which isnt even yet complete and then complain that it isnt supported yet.
null
0
1315804723
False
0
c2j8604
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8604
t1_c2j7gso
null
1427588903
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
slyf
null
Oh wow, how did I never think of that
null
0
1315804946
False
0
c2j86v0
t3_kchtc
null
t1_c2j86v0
t3_kchtc
null
1427588912
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
quatch
null
> > I can't differentiate between the two greens on the screen one. > >Note: The screen version now only has 1 green. > >Can you give me a specific example, so I know exactly where to look please? Thanks. In the legend, the highlight for the two words in green appears to be slightly different greens. Again, awesome work.
null
0
1315805071
False
0
c2j87bf
t3_k9akm
null
t1_c2j87bf
t1_c2ipbn7
null
1427588918
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
munificent
null
That's small potatoes. ES5 strict mode takes care of that.
null
0
1315805139
False
0
c2j87m9
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j87m9
t1_c2j3vkv
null
1427588922
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pnettle
null
Um what? Open source from a big company allows patent trolls to easily see what their code does EXACTLY. This opens you up for a lot of patent lawsuits for code related things that normally are extremely hard to show that someone did. Someone patentend something similar to a linked list recently, its EASY to show a data structure was used if you have code. If you don't? Its a lot harder. Plus based on the code that interacts with hardware they can get better ideas of what the hardware is doing. Part of the reason a lot of the video card companies fought so hard not to release open source drivers themselves.
null
0
1315805198
False
0
c2j87ty
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j87ty
t1_c2j7r09
null
1427588925
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MatrixFrog
null
Good point. Okay, how about the way there's no "int" type? So you have to do floating-point arithmetic, even when all you really want is integer arithmetic. Although IIRC some JS engines even handle that by using ints behind the scenes for certain numbers.
null
0
1315805320
False
0
c2j88av
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j88av
t1_c2j87m9
null
1427588931
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
how do you figure? of course IE is a more powerful browser in every regard. if you've ever worked for a large company you would know this: GPO support, zones, sandboxing, filtering, locked-down configs, etc... if you were an admin you'd know how to leverage them all... the fact that it doesn't support a few of the latest LAYOUT features means nothing. real devs dont care about rounded corners and shit. btw, read a bit about ie10 and how so far it is the most compliant html5/css3 browser. not the platform preview, but the internal test builds.
null
0
1315805337
False
0
c2j88cq
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j88cq
t1_c2j7mvg
null
1427588931
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
-whileone-
null
they are up to version 3 of the draft. it's not clear what exactly chrome implements, google hasn't (afaik) said, this draft is good, go forth and implement.
null
0
1315805365
False
0
c2j88gt
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j88gt
t1_c2j7isl
null
1427588933
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315805365
False
0
c2j88h2
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j88h2
t3_kc9ai
null
1427588933
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315805415
False
0
c2j88nc
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j88nc
t1_c2j4fex
null
1427588935
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
lessthanthreereddit
null
Why?
null
0
1315805561
False
0
c2j898i
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j898i
t1_c2j4jws
null
1427588944
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tsujiku
null
I certainly do, and the difference was astounding. While it might take several seconds (certainly a noticeable period of time) for Firefox to start, Chrome would start up into a useable state in less than a second. Meanwhile rendering pages on Firefox felt slow and sluggish, while on Chrome the experience seemed much smoother (although I admit this is a much more subjective measure. In theory, you would be able to find a copy of Chrome and Firefox from those days and measure objectively the differences in rendering and start up time for each. Feel free to tell me if my memory is mistaken.)
null
0
1315805742
False
0
c2j89y0
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j89y0
t1_c2j6r19
null
1427588952
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315805747
False
0
c2j89yv
t3_kchtc
null
t1_c2j89yv
t3_kchtc
null
1427588952
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
foobeans
null
If you have to write an article that is basically "no wait! I swear its easy to learn.", then its not easy to learn.
null
0
1315805899
False
0
c2j8aj9
t3_k5d4v
null
t1_c2j8aj9
t3_k5d4v
null
1427588960
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
washort
null
ECMAScript 5, for one. ECMAScript 6 is will be another, soon. (If you haven't looked at [the stuff that's coming in this version](http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proposals) then you really should - Google's Dart/Dash project will have to be pretty awesome to be a clear winner over this.)
null
0
1315805924
False
0
c2j8amz
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8amz
t1_c2j6er9
null
1427588961
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
washort
null
Java and Python and C#/CLR are the obvious examples.
null
0
1315805972
False
0
c2j8at8
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8at8
t1_c2j7x00
null
1427588963
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
noone cares about rgba. seriously. border radius? screw that.. box shadow? lol... these are all gimmicks. if you had said something like SVG support (prior to ie9).. maybe you'da deserved at least some credit... but then again, barely anyone uses SVG so who cares. IE's dx filters are way more powerful, but granted, not standards compliant. who cares: you're talking about gimmicks. a feature that actually makes sense like writing-mode will not be implemented in gecko/webkit for a few months still. its the only way to actually do vertical text. rotate+transform don't set the bounding box, hence fail... seriously, if you've ever been in the publishing business, you'd find vertical text used infrequently, but rounded corners? have you ever seen a newspaper with rounded corners? it is called 'web publishing' <- concerning layout, etc...
null
0
1315806061
False
0
c2j8b5a
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8b5a
t1_c2j78yr
null
1427588968
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315806106
False
0
c2j8bb6
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8bb6
t1_c2j75gs
null
1427588970
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hiffy
null
Are they? JRuby seems to work mostly OK. I mean, how are they so closely coupled? What's the mechanism here?
null
0
1315806116
False
0
c2j8bcn
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8bcn
t1_c2j8at8
null
1427588970
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
muuh-gnu
null
> All other licenses. All other licenses, say BSD, MIT, Apache, Artistic to name a few, exist solely to enable proprietary forks. GPL-like licenses like CDDL have been created solely with the intent to prevent code sharing with the GPL bubble.
null
0
1315806196
False
0
c2j8bn3
t3_kbbbu
null
t1_c2j8bn3
t1_c2j4jgz
null
1427588975
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sfork
null
Chrome gets laggy for no reason also.
null
0
1315806219
False
0
c2j8bqs
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8bqs
t1_c2j4vut
null
1427588976
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
LtArson
null
Ah, I see. I was correct when I surmised that you were designing geocities pages. All bare text. You've probably never written a web app in your life, where things need to be dynamic (AJAX, javascript) and attractive (CSS).
null
0
1315806224
False
0
c2j8bro
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8bro
t1_c2j8b5a
null
1427588977
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
LuxNocte
null
This is why I always ready my torch first. If the monster turns out not to be entirely evil, you can roast marshmallows!
null
0
1315806341
False
0
c2j8c8m
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8c8m
t1_c2j7h9m
null
1427588982
29
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sidneyc
null
Well, I don't know if it's the case, but lying about the motivations could be a way to prevent unrest at a technologically bad, marketing-driven decision among the programmers. I don't work at Google but I would be pretty flipped off at a policy that threatens web homogeneity, and much more so if the admitted reason was to become a technology monopolist.
null
0
1315806437
False
0
c2j8cm0
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8cm0
t1_c2j5gvj
null
1427588988
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
omnilynx
null
Nice, but of course "x --> a" only works if a < x.
null
0
1315806577
False
0
c2j8d32
t3_kchtc
null
t1_c2j8d32
t3_kchtc
null
1427588999
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JohannQ
null
"Don't be evil" originally was just used internally though... and just "invented" for that purpose.
null
0
1315806946
False
0
c2j8eet
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8eet
t1_c2j4z1w
null
1427589011
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
eras
null
Indeed. And if that's not mentioned, maybe there are even greater things that go unmentioned! Well, maybe not.
null
0
1315807669
False
0
c2j8gwl
t3_kbz68
null
t1_c2j8gwl
t1_c2j4cu0
null
1427589044
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
dude, they only became available earlier this year... :\
null
0
1315807888
False
0
c2j8hmi
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8hmi
t1_c2j7c90
null
1427589052
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
masklinn
null
You know who tried to do the same in the late 90s? Microsoft, with ActiveX. They pushed really hard for other browsers to adopt their open standard, so that plugins would become scriptable. Also, Visual Basic Script. In fact, MS's push for VBS as a standard browser scripting mechanism is the whole reason why JS had to be built in 10 days.
null
0
1315808357
False
0
c2j8j6h
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8j6h
t1_c2j4tk9
null
1427589073
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I see. So it's OK to be intellectually dishonest as long as you make a joke about it? andralex (the OP) submitted a link to further the popularity of D based on what he knows to be meaningless. If that's not intellectually dishonest...
null
0
1315808414
False
0
c2j8jdp
t3_kaxjq
null
t1_c2j8jdp
t1_c2j521n
null
1427589075
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
masklinn
null
Google-engineer-led does not mean Google is the sole input to the spec.
null
0
1315808510
False
0
c2j8joj
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8joj
t1_c2j7rvf
null
1427589079
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
masklinn
null
> In other words, this is like using Coffeescript to write your client-side code. No. The first and main target of Dash is to run in Chrome, natively. The second target is a (likely restricted) compiler for a few applications Google thinks it can throw bones at people about/for. > This is an obvious move - if you're designing a new standard They're not designing a new standard anymore than Microsoft was when they built ActiveX and VBS (and they did try to get those into browsers).
null
0
1315808703
False
0
c2j8ka5
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8ka5
t1_c2j5tti
null
1427589087
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
munificent
null
> Good point. Okay, how about the way there's no "int" type? Numeric types in a dynamically typed language is surprisingly hard to get right. (Case in point, take a look at some of the evolution Python has had in that area.) Always doing floating point is a pain if you're coming from a statically-typed or lower-level language background (and is definitely the semantics you want in some cases). But if you *don't* come from that background, then the semantics they imply are utterly baffling to you. Try asking your non-technical friend what "5 divided by 2" is. Then ask them what "5.0 divided by 2.0" is. JavaScript was designed to be friendly to users like that, so "floating point" always isn't *that* bad of a choice. What would you propose instead? > Although IIRC some JS engines even handle that by using ints behind the scenes for certain numbers. Yeah, V8 has "SMI"s which are unboxed integers that it uses when it knows it's safe to do so, but the user-visible semantics are always "floating-point everywhere". SMIs are an implementation detail.
null
0
1315808918
False
0
c2j8kx2
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8kx2
t1_c2j88av
null
1427589096
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dleary
null
They are already doing this with Native Client, which currently supports a subset of actual native code as a 'bytecode', and is slated to support llvm bitcode for true portability.
null
0
1315808949
False
0
c2j8l17
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8l17
t1_c2j62f5
null
1427589097
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
fokov
null
If support or sales are in the building, at least one dev or real dev mgmt needs to be there. If for only the purpose of controlling fires.
null
0
1315809029
False
0
c2j8lak
t3_k9z9s
null
t1_c2j8lak
t1_c2ivewj
null
1427589101
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonzinip
null
GCC stands for GNU Compiler Collection. Right now it supports C, C++, Java, Ada, Go, Objective-C. Other front-ends (at least D and Pascal) are available out of tree.
null
0
1315809113
False
0
c2j8ljn
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8ljn
t1_c2j7gi6
null
1427589106
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
harsman
null
24 has improved support, but deftheme and provide-theme is in Emacs 23 as well. It might even be in 22, I haven't checked. It really is a feature of custom.el, not something related to just colors. See here: http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/emacs/Custom-Themes.html
null
0
1315809360
False
0
c2j8m97
t3_kbz68
null
t1_c2j8m97
t1_c2j3zer
null
1427589114
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hackinthebochs
null
This is wrong. Openness is an all or nothing proposition. It's just when marketers get a hold of the idea, then it becomes degrees of openness so they can say well we're more open than those guys. It's a subtle trick to get credit for being "open" while at the same time being completely closed where it actually matters. It's like how the word freedom used to be all or nothing, but now its degrees. "They hate us for our *freedoms*" was a common line from Bush. Freedom can now be enumerated, and thus some can be taken away while still claiming to be "free". It's subtle.
null
0
1315809470
False
0
c2j8mlc
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8mlc
t1_c2j7czh
null
1427589119
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
RobotBuddha
null
>They publish a "spec" but in reality the code is the spec, and since launching it they have made zero real effort to make it a true open standard. On that one, I think the same could be said of webkit. And that's turned out pretty well.
null
0
1315809531
False
0
c2j8mrm
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8mrm
t1_c2j67v2
null
1427589120
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MatrixFrog
null
> What would you propose instead? I certainly don't think I'm smart enough to come up with my own language, because I have no idea what I would propose, among other reasons. Python has the same goal of being easy to use for beginners but it also ends up being confusing for more experienced developers sometimes. I only brought up this issue because one of Google's claims is that JavaScript has "inherent performance problems" so I'm doing my best to guess specifically what they mean by that. This *might* be one of the things they mean, and if it is, they have some tough choices to make about how they're going to support integer arithmetic without violating the principle of least surprise with the "5/2" situation. On the other hand, as you say, they've managed to do that already in some cases while maintaining "floating-point everywhere" semantics. So maybe this isn't what they mean. I really don't know what they mean, I'm just speculating. It will be interesting to see what they come up with...
null
0
1315809607
False
0
c2j8mzn
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8mzn
t1_c2j8kx2
null
1427589123
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MatrixFrog
null
I happen to like when memes leak into non-meme-based reddits, but I still downvoted this because: putStr "\n"
null
0
1315809693
False
0
c2j8n96
t3_k90mr
null
t1_c2j8n96
t3_k90mr
null
1427589127
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
user741
null
> to take someones code and leave the freedom bubble I've never understood what exactly is wrong with that. As it's been said time and time again on reddit, *sharing* ≠ *theft*. It's not like you lose ownership of the code when someone uses it in their application and doesn't release the source of the whole application afterwards.
null
0
1315809710
False
0
c2j8nau
t3_kbbbu
null
t1_c2j8nau
t1_c2j2eb0
null
1427589127
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pnettle
null
'optimally' != 'necessary' Besides which monopoly is STILL a shitty word for this. A monopoly on what? The browser that can optimally view their sites? Its not a monopoly on ANYTHING.
null
0
1315809762
False
0
c2j8ngh
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8ngh
t1_c2j8bb6
null
1427589139
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
littleendian
null
Personally I find the "drama queens" to be the least productive members of a team. Good developers spot problems and get them fixed without making a lot of noise. > Using TFS **looks** ... I use both git and TFS on a daily basis both do their job very well and neither gets in the way. DVCS's are clearly the future but that doesn't equate to everything else being unusable.
null
0
1315809825
False
0
c2j8nmy
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2j8nmy
t1_c2j55aw
null
1427589133
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
thenuge26
null
Pretty sure the CLR is closed source, so good luck with that. The JVM on the other hand...
null
0
1315810460
False
0
c2j8pfq
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8pfq
t1_c2iy080
null
1428194410
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Shaper_pmp
null
Fair point - perhaps "propaganda" would have been a better choice of word.
null
0
1315810476
False
0
c2j8phb
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8phb
t1_c2j5mrd
null
1428194412
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
drgath
null
Tweaking your prefixed -box-shadow CSS3 property is one thing. Adding a whole new runtime into the browser is another. Dash and NativeClient are not, and will likely never be W3C/WHATWG recommendations. As such, they have no business being inside of a web browser, and they especially shouldn't [be touted](http://chrome.blogspot.com/2011/08/building-better-web-apps-with-new.html) as a way to enhance your [web app](http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/).
null
0
1315810552
False
0
c2j8poh
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8poh
t1_c2j5yl6
null
1427589169
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
dude, i dont even have to argue with you. your vocabulary and breadth of knowledge in this regard is clearly inferior. stop trying to fool people, put it on your resume, hope someone cares. 'dynamic' lol... 'ajax'... lmfao...
null
0
1315810591
False
0
c2j8psg
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8psg
t1_c2j8bro
null
1427589159
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
CCSS
null
I think the lack of developers is a case of natural selection at work
null
0
1315811067
False
0
c2j8r0z
t3_kctmn
null
t1_c2j8r0z
t3_kctmn
null
1427589176
58
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gotebe
null
Of course, I didn't want to say that there is a better alternative. It's just... Understanding that: 1. there's memory leaks in GC environments 2. GC environments do less for your WRT all other resource management than e.g. C++ or D. is paramount to using GC environments well.
null
0
1315811179
False
0
c2j8rb1
t3_k8gr4
null
t1_c2j8rb1
t1_c2izwrr
null
1427589182
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
meh, i wouldn't want any 'standards' from mozilla. they cant even implement the w3c standards, and keep reiterating that their implementation is the correct one, when it obviously is not in some cases. not to mention their misleading marketing 'safer, faster' browsing experience. lol, both are fantasies.
null
0
1315811214
False
0
c2j8re7
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8re7
t1_c2j5x5q
null
1427589184
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Dislexsick
null
Statistical outlier. Google have stated that is a once off. If it continues, we have cause for concern. Furthermore, any manufacturer in the Open Handset Alliance can indeed get the source code. It's open source, but access to the source requires you to have valid reason to access it.
null
0
1315811269
False
0
c2j8ril
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8ril
t1_c2j6psq
null
1427589187
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315811295
False
0
c2j8rkx
t3_kctmn
null
t1_c2j8rkx
t3_kctmn
null
1427589196
-6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sod1864
null
What I wouldn't like to see is the repeat of Microsoft. Where if you are not on their platform, then you are treated as a second class citizen (if you are lucky). We are already starting to see this in their iPad applications. All of Googles iPad web applications are broken or usability is poor. Well below par what I've come to expect from Google. Even when so many complained about bad Web Search UI they added a "classic" link back to the real site. Except that it doesn't remember you picked that, and the link is at the bottom of the page. Making it a useless option. So if they plan to make a great new standard, well and good. But please don't lets have a repeat of the last 10-15 years in stifling of innovation.
null
0
1315811302
False
0
c2j8rld
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8rld
t3_kc9ai
null
1427589196
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bigfig
null
After embracing distributed computing (remember "The Network is the Computer") Sun ran away from it, which was odd because that was what they pushed for so long. Maybe it was due to the polluted jre that Microsoft was pushing onto the PC at the time, and they didn't have the cash to fight back with marketing and client side development. Not sure but what a complete turnaround.
null
0
1315811314
False
0
c2j8rmo
t3_kbdp7
null
t1_c2j8rmo
t1_c2j6k44
null
1427589196
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
othermaciej
null
1. It's been about 2 years since Google's acquisition of On2 and a year since they announced WebM. Since then, they haven't submitted it to a standards body. 2. It may be labeled an experiment but Chrome uses it to talk to google.com servers, by default. That's production use by anyone's standard, surely? When IE used a special faster protocol to talk to IIS, that certainly got more attention. 3. The NPAPI is standardized by the informal plugin-futures group. As for your final point - you say that Google wants to develop complete products before they release things. But all the things we are talking about are already released. So by your definition, they must be complete. Heck, in many cases they are in end-to-end production use. But Google doesn't seem interested in actually bringing them to standards bodies. I am not sure you are familiar with how standards work. I have been very involved with the W3C for about a decade now, so let me explain a bit. Standards groups don't generally attempt a "hostile takeover" of someone's existing nonstandard technology. Sometimes that happens, but it's not usually a good basis for building a standard, if you don't have the vendor's cooperation. Furthermore, standards groups don't usually like it when you bring them a complete, finalized soution as a fait accompli at a point where it is too late to make changes because it is already in use in production. The point of the open standards process is to give everyone a say in the direction of the technology. Google is definitely not behaving as a good Web standards citizen here. That is there right, but it is also fair to call them on it.
null
0
1315811336
False
0
c2j8rpb
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8rpb
t1_c2j7r6u
null
1427589188
23
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
othermaciej
null
In fact, it definitely isn't, and the editor of HTML5 started it long before he worked for Google. I do give Google credit for paying him to continue the work.
null
0
1315811379
False
0
c2j8rt9
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8rt9
t1_c2j8joj
null
1427589199
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
danuker
null
Here's a valid reason: curiosity.
null
0
1315811396
False
0
c2j8rux
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8rux
t1_c2j8ril
null
1427589199
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
clintm
null
Someone who loves oop giving his opinion. No biggie.
null
0
1315811451
False
0
c2j8s0d
t3_kc5gh
null
t1_c2j8s0d
t1_c2j6eaz
null
1427589192
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
othermaciej
null
WebKit is a big pile of code that implements other standards. I'm not sure how you would "make it a true open standard". (Incidentally I happen to be one of the earliest contributors to the WebKit project.) Gecko (the engine inside Firefox) has an independent implementation of many of the same standards. As a result, the same content works in both out of the box. That's the difference between open standards and open source in a nutshell.
null
0
1315811504
False
0
c2j8s52
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8s52
t1_c2j8mrm
null
1427589194
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
othermaciej
null
CLR and JVM are fairly tied to the semantics of C# and Java respectively. Languages that are successful on the JVM either adopt a lot of the semantics of C#/Java (mainly the object model), or they have poorly performing default implementations, or they have no non-JVM/CLR implementation in the first place.
null
0
1315811648
False
0
c2j8shz
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8shz
t1_c2j6ina
null
1427589201
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
othermaciej
null
Different Turing-equivalent machines are equivalent up to a polynomial factor of performance. In other words, yes, you can build any language on top of any sufficiently general VM, but that doesn't mean it's going to be as fast as it could be.
null
0
1315811712
False
0
c2j8snv
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8snv
t1_c2j7x00
null
1427589204
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sod1864
null
That is Wikimedia traffic analysis. It is not reflective of the whole internet.
null
0
1315811719
False
0
c2j8soo
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8soo
t1_c2j7ejj
null
1427589204
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Do you mean to imply that def section_link(name,options) if options[:action] == @current_action and options[:controller] == @current_controller link_to(name, options), :class => 'on') else link_to(name,options) end end is not idiomatic Ruby!!?
null
0
1315811785
False
0
c2j8sup
t3_kcnuw
null
t1_c2j8sup
t1_c2j7guo
null
1427589204
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
monotux
null
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/CoffeeMode
null
0
1315811792
False
0
c2j8svb
t3_kbz68
null
t1_c2j8svb
t1_c2j31wx
null
1427589204
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Kaerigan
null
Yeah, ok, maybe not Perl.
null
0
1315811904
False
0
c2j8t58
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8t58
t1_c2j5ljr
null
1427589206
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
How so?
null
0
1315811959
False
0
c2j8t9w
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8t9w
t1_c2j5n0i
null
1427589209
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sod1864
null
> I'm far from being a Google fan boy but I agree with their analysis of the state of JavaScript. There isn't any. Just insinuation, but no substance. ( I would certainly like to read it, if it is mentioned elsewhere).
null
0
1315812034
True
0
c2j8th2
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8th2
t1_c2j4hjd
null
1427589209
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315812169
True
0
c2j8try
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8try
t1_c2j8ngh
null
1427589214
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315812351
False
0
c2j8u7i
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2j8u7i
t1_c2j5yju
null
1427589219
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
FredFnord
null
Laugh? I nearly started.
null
0
1315812558
False
0
c2j8up5
t3_kchtc
null
t1_c2j8up5
t3_kchtc
null
1427589224
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mrargh
null
Why would code ever be committed to trunk?!?!?!?!? Use branches and then merge down complete units of development.
null
0
1315812559
False
0
c2j8up9
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2j8up9
t1_c2j44jb
null
1427589224
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mrargh
null
Which is why you review a diff after the merge, and run your full suite of automated tests.
null
0
1315812849
False
0
c2j8ve9
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2j8ve9
t1_c2j3x0m
null
1427589233
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
syranex
null
a.) No. I'm not going to waste my time on this because the original was bad. b.) The title is misleading, at first I thought you were saying that SWG was the Original MMORPG, as in the first MMORPG.
null
0
1315812905
False
0
c2j8viw
t3_kctmn
null
t1_c2j8viw
t3_kctmn
null
1427589235
-41
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
well, soon you won't have to be second-class because all tablets will run windows 8. no more 'mobile' operating system.
null
0
1315812919
False
0
c2j8vju
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2j8vju
t1_c2j8rld
null
1427589235
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mrargh
null
No, but it is a productivity drain. I'll stick with best of breed where I don't have to deal with crap like that.
null
0
1315813016
False
0
c2j8vri
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2j8vri
t1_c2j604h
null
1427589238
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null