claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
Proactive communication about reclaiming personal effects from police custody is outside the state's responsibilities.
[ "City of West Covina v. Perkins" ]
null
Refuted
United States courts' judge-made standards do not govern negligence claims against depository institution staff.
[ "Atherton v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" ]
null
Supported
State laws that automatically remove a former spouse as a beneficiary after divorce do apply to federal employee life insurance policies, overriding federal regulations and ensuring the former spouse's beneficiary status is revoked.
[ "Hillman v. Maretta" ]
null
Refuted
Police officers are prohibited from using deadly force to stop a fleeing vehicle, even when the driver poses an immediate and substantial risk of harm to others.
[ "Scott v. Harris" ]
null
Refuted
Forcing state civil servants who are not members of a labor organization to provide financial resources to it conflicts with constitutional expressive freedoms.
[ "Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31" ]
Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington
Overruled
Subnational authorities must adhere to national data protection standards even when jurisdictional codes permit disclosure of unique identifiers.
[ "Reno v. Condon" ]
null
Supported
U.S. foundational law mandates that courts review exemption requests to forgo family communication before pregnancy termination and determine if the process advances youth well-being.
[ "Lambert v. Wicklund" ]
null
Refuted
Indispensable operational responsibilities of polities established by constitutional compact do not prevent union-level authority's taxation under the foundational legal framework.
[ "Massachusetts v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Employers are prohibited from implementing gender-specific quotas.
[ "Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty." ]
null
Supported
A guardian's ability to restrict a minor's movement between sovereign nations constitutes a residence-controlling right under the 1980 transnational agreement for youth relocation arbitration.
[ "Abbott v. Abbott" ]
null
Refuted
The government has a legal duty to manage tribal resources in the best interest of Native American tribes, even without explicit legal mandates.
[ "United States v. Navajo Nation" ]
null
Refuted
Statutes restricting communicative activity in the vicinity of sites where voters cast ballots must be essential for preserving electoral integrity without exceeding necessary scope.
[ "Burson v. Freeman" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional procedural safeguards permit the removal of students with educational deficiencies without a formal proceeding before the institution's final decision-makers.
[ "Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz" ]
null
Refuted
Judicial personnel are under no obligation to reevaluate earlier misconduct records when adjusting penalties under updated regulatory standards.
[ "Dillon v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
The state is required to establish specific circumstances that elevate the offense's gravity before capital punishment authorization.
[ "Walton v. Arizona" ]
null
Supported
The branch tasked with enforcing statutes may not take possession of assets owned by citizens without explicit congressional direction, irrespective of any national crisis.
[ "Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer" ]
null
Refuted
State charter revisions mandating exclusion of ethnic background and gender from admission decisions in taxpayer-funded academic settings do not conflict with the federal mandate for uniform legal treatment.
[ "Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action" ]
null
Refuted
Humorous imitation of existing works legally incorporates key portions necessary for conveying commentary.
[ "Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc." ]
null
Supported
State authorities can mandate the revelation of personally identifying details for individuals supporting a law requiring direct electoral approval when a vital community need exists.
[ "Doe #1 v. Reed" ]
null
Supported
When dispute resolution authorities affirm actual happenings, courts' ability to modify those determinations is severely limited regardless of any misjudgments.
[ "Major League Baseball Players Association v. Garvey" ]
null
Refuted
Conducting a chemical assay to determine whether a compound is unlawful violates confidentiality guarantees because it unveils hidden specifics about a courier item's interior that can't be perceived by the naked eye and aren't evident from the exterior.
[ "United States v. Jacobsen" ]
null
Refuted
Constitutional guarantees of free expression do not prevent government-operated universities from requiring all campus groups to accept any enrolled individual, even when disagreeing with the group's core doctrines.
[ "Christian Legal Society Chapter v. Martinez" ]
null
Refuted
A statute authorizing pregnancy-prevention agents for certain uses violates constitutional principles if it restricts those agents for other reasons based on whether individuals are married or single, provided there's no reasonable connection to a proper governmental purpose.
[ "Eisenstadt v. Baird" ]
null
Refuted
Under constitutional guarantees for expressive freedom, verbal communication designed to inflict major psychological injury on private persons is not legally actionable.
[ "Snyder v. Phelps" ]
null
Refuted
The right to call witnesses in your defense applies to all state courts.
[ "Washington v. Texas" ]
null
Supported
Judges are barred from invoking societal consensus to invalidate contractual dispute resolutions.
[ "Eastern Associated Coal Corporation v. United Mine Workers of America, District 17" ]
null
Supported
When the federal government files an antitrust lawsuit, the time limit for related private lawsuits stops running until the government's case is resolved.
[ "Leh v. General Petroleum Corporation" ]
null
Supported
In transit hubs serving air travelers, communication exhibits reduced constitutional safeguards, permitting government action to regulate usable expression forms.
[ "International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee" ]
null
Supported
The Second Amendment right to bear arms is not automatically applicable to state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
[ "McDonald v. Chicago", "United States v. Miller" ]
null
Refuted
Medical treatment institutions may pursue legal action in federal courts against sovereign public entities when compensation for medical services under federal poverty assistance programs is less than required to ensure efficient facility operation.
[ "Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Association" ]
null
Supported
Pecuniary claims by the United States are subject to a 6-year statute of limitations only when pursued in judicial proceedings, not agency directives.
[ "BP America Production Co. v. Burton" ]
null
Supported
When state executive authorities reassess prison terms, incarcerated individuals may talk without counsel, and this does not impede their constitutional protection against self-incrimination.
[ "Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard" ]
null
Supported
When the national revenue authority fails to register a statutory obligation against land assets, local regulations determine creditor reimbursement priority from asset disposition proceeds.
[ "United States v. Estate of Romani" ]
null
Supported
Judicial officers are permitted to adjust punishment frameworks due to opposition to the rationale for those frameworks, even when not exclusively dependent on proceeding-related particulars.
[ "Spears v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Statutorily mandated coverage for workplace injuries is not considered a staff welfare program in determining creditor repayment order under U.S. Code Title 11.
[ "Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co." ]
null
Supported
The U.S. executive branch cannot obstruct foreign journeys for people with U.S. citizenship or condition border transit permits on ideological associations.
[ "Kent v. Dulles" ]
null
Refuted
The granting of access to private quarters is invalidated when premised on false judicial authority claims.
[ "Bumper v. North Carolina" ]
null
Supported
Statements by government personnel given under legal requirements are constitutionally protected when honest and unrelated to their role.
[ "Lane v. Franks" ]
null
Supported
Federal legislative bodies may eliminate state protection from federal lawsuits when public services are denied to people requiring accommodations for physical or cognitive differences, provided repeated procedural justice breaches are evidenced and remedies are proportionate.
[ "Tennessee v. Lane" ]
null
Refuted
Even when federal law does not designate territory as a specific sovereignty-related classification, indigenous governments can impose financial charges on external parties conducting commercial activity within their control if there is mutual agreement or a need to preserve self-determination.
[ "Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government", "Atkinson Trading Company, Inc. v. Shirley" ]
null
Refuted
Police may search without a warrant only to find people who need urgent help or suspects still present.
[ "Flippo v. West Virginia" ]
California v. Acevedo; New York v. Belton; Pennsylvania v. Mimms
Overruled
States have sole control over procedures for determining intellectual disability in death penalty cases, which may exclude all non-professional decision-makers.
[ "Schriro v. Smith" ]
null
Supported
The chief national executive has authority to withdraw from international treaties independent of legislative consent.
[ "Goldwater v. Carter" ]
null
Refuted
Being part of a political group alone doesn't stop someone from getting a professional license; there must be proof the group membership affects their job duties.
[ "Baird v. State Bar of Arizona" ]
null
Supported
State-funded pregnancy termination services ensure uniform healthcare access alongside bodily autonomy protection.
[ "Webster v. Reproductive Health Services" ]
null
Refuted
The standard for constitutional protections hinges on objective assessment of freedom of movement, not public safety personnel's subjective determinations.
[ "Stansbury v. California" ]
null
Supported
Penalties for environmental noncompliance forestall recurrences rather than solely punish prior breaches.
[ "Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc." ]
null
Refuted
In federal caseloads derived from state statutes, state-imposed litigation rules may not consistently outrank safeguards guaranteed by the founding document when vital to the judiciary's proper operation.
[ "Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.", "Engle v. Isaac", "Koehler v. Engle" ]
null
Refuted
A conscious breach of laws prohibiting workplace bias by date of birth occurs when an employer acts with knowledge of their actions' unlawfulness or shows flagrant indifference to legal compliance.
[ "Hazen Paper Company v. Biggins" ]
null
Supported
A law cannot be declared unconstitutional unless the parties have challenged its constitutionality during the case.
[ "United States v. Sineneng-Smith" ]
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
Overruled
Changes threatening maritime safety or violating global standards cannot be mandated for vessels registered outside the United States by United States law.
[ "Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd." ]
null
Supported
Government agencies are liable for negligence claims even if their inspection method was a choice made by officials rather than a required procedure, and the discretionary function exception does not protect them from such liability.
[ "United States v. S.A. Empressa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines)" ]
null
Refuted
Official records are examined to preserve prior administrative actions without impairing freedom of association when minimal intrusion is necessary to serve vital societal welfare.
[ "Nixon v. Administrator of General Services" ]
null
Supported
Minor population imbalances across voting jurisdictions are legally permissible; rectification is unnecessary until the subsequent national enumeration.
[ "Abrams v. Johnson" ]
Wesberry v. Sanders
Overruled
State-imposed fees for public road usage that remain constant irrespective of miles traveled are lawful only when they do not impose disproportionate burdens on commerce across jurisdictions or cause trade obstructions upon universal application.
[ "American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Scheiner" ]
null
Refuted
State legislative frameworks granting higher judicial bodies the power to reassess compensatory sums violate constitutional protections against reexamining facts determined by civil juries.
[ "Gasperini v. Center for Humanities Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Requiring a doctor to tell parents before an abortion for a minor is not an unreasonable burden.
[ "Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health" ]
null
Supported
Requiring actions that inherently convey a message of endorsement does violate the First Amendment, as demonstrated by the Solomon Amendment compelling universities to provide access to military recruiters, thereby forcing them to participate in speech they disagree with.
[ "Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
State procedural norms regarding proper claim assertion in judicial proceedings make additional requests for release from unlawful detention unnecessary; federal mechanisms to correct prior judgments resolve the matter.
[ "Abdur'Rahman v. Bell" ]
null
Supported
Courts generally cannot stop someone from suing just because another person with the same lawyer already lost a similar case.
[ "Taylor v. Sturgell" ]
null
Supported
If the Supreme Court has not required states to follow the double jeopardy rule, then state courts can retry a person for the same crime.
[ "Palko v. Connecticut" ]
null
Supported
Entitlements to aquatic resources remain unchanged by agreements defining territorial demarcations unless explicitly covered in the accord.
[ "Arizona v. California" ]
null
Supported
Regardless of how defense counsel is compensated—publicly or privately—the standard for assessing judicial expediency remains identical for all persons charged.
[ "Vermont v. Brillon" ]
null
Supported
Legal challenges regarding how the state implements the ultimate sanction are not bound by identical constraints as petitions contesting the court's judgment.
[ "Hill v. McDonough", "Nelson v. Campbell" ]
null
Supported
Sweeping assumptions about immune-compromising conditions cannot form the foundation for withholding medical care; decisions must be tied to individualized medical evidence.
[ "Bragdon v. Abbott" ]
null
Supported
Statutory protections for artistic expression forbid the copying and distribution of a creator's output in a distinct digital archive absent authorization, irrespective of whether the archive is deemed a new iteration of the source material.
[ "New York Times Company, Inc. v. Tasini" ]
null
Refuted
Federal bodies with authority over commercial transactions between states regulate pricing for cargo crossing national borders with sections in the nation's territory.
[ "Canada Packers, Ltd. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company" ]
null
Refuted
Constitutional safeguards against unlawful seizures impose no obligation that the substantive basis for detention match the rationale expressed during custody.
[ "Devenpeck v. Alford" ]
null
Supported
After enabling retirement benefits, any new conditions blocking sustained disbursement constitute prohibited reductions of accrued entitlements.
[ "Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz" ]
null
Supported
Legal action may proceed despite an incorrect designation of the liable party if the correct entity received notification of the claim.
[ "Krupski v. Costa Crociere, S.p.A." ]
null
Supported
A regulation that blocks a specific development but allows other uses of the land is not considered a taking under the Constitution.
[ "Penn Central Transportation Company v. New York City" ]
null
Supported
State law mandates that substantive issues be introduced at the first opportunity for judicial review; omission at that stage bars any future reference to the issue regardless of the reason.
[ "Murray v. Carrier" ]
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex rel. Flowers
Overruled
When government representatives engage in joint efforts to undermine constitutional guarantees, national law applies; such issues are not exclusively governed by subnational regulatory frameworks.
[ "United States v. Price" ]
null
Refuted
Statutory authority permits revenue officials to determine unreported service gratuities through application of standardized rates from cashless transaction data to overall income totals.
[ "United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Deprivation of judicially required legal reference materials for individuals proceeding without counsel does not, by itself, breach the constitutional right to personally defend against prosecution.
[ "Kane v. Garcia Espitia" ]
null
Refuted
When federal dollars fund public works ventures, conservation law obligations endure irrespective of funding timing.
[ "Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill" ]
null
Refuted
Juries require clear guidelines to select between capital punishment and perpetual detention.
[ "Maxwell v. Bishop" ]
null
Supported
Legal actions pursuing monetary sanctions for environmental infractions remain justiciable even after the offender complies with rules, since such sanctions address previous harm and discourage subsequent misconduct.
[ "Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Federal legislation addressing indigenous land rights in America's largest state does not automatically confer jurisdictional status for tribal control over real estate.
[ "Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government" ]
null
Refuted
Congressional statutes limit custody duration, prohibiting continued confinement past the deportation deadline.
[ "Zadvydas v. Davis" ]
null
Supported
Laws mandating exclusive creator rights can limit the First Amendment by reducing society's ability to access and employ unique creations, even with permitted instances and the concept-physical separation.
[ "Golan v. Holder" ]
null
Refuted
When factual assertions are added to a modified legal filing, such claims do not inherit the earlier submission's timestamp solely due to overlapping incidents; their concrete details and proof sources must precisely mirror those from the original proceeding.
[ "Mayle v. Felix" ]
null
Refuted
A jurisdiction has the authority to impose fiscal obligations on economic operations spanning multiple regions even when no physical assets exist within its proximity
[ "Colonial Pipeline Company v. Traigle" ]
null
Refuted
Automatic dismissal protection is not afforded to a judicial claim submitted after exceeding the statutory time limit solely because it was initially included in a group litigation.
[ "China Agritech v. Resh", "Jinks v. Richland County, South Carolina" ]
null
Refuted
Electoral district alterations must not increase barriers preventing traditionally underserved communities from electing preferred candidates compared to prior schemes.
[ "Georgia v. Ashcroft" ]
null
Supported
Justification is unnecessary when disqualifying individuals scheduled for courtroom service, and it is allowed even when the action is tied to skin tone.
[ "Batson v. Kentucky", "Foster v. Chatman", "Georgia v. McCollum", "Miller-El v. Dretke", "Powers v. Ohio" ]
null
Refuted
Labor organizations are lawfully allowed to acquire aid from workplace management entities in exchange for commitments to avoid labor walkouts, protest demonstrations, and other measures that might adversely affect commercial operations.
[ "Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall" ]
null
Refuted
Abrogating immunity for lawsuits over artistic works requires legislative provisions congruent with the illustrated protective needs for creators' exclusive entitlements.
[ "Allen v. Cooper" ]
null
Refuted
Details about proposed corporate transactions are significant if they influence market participants' investment choices, irrespective of closing probability or timing.
[ "Basic Inc. v. Levinson" ]
null
Refuted
Private relators must submit appeals within thirty days for cases alleging fraud against public funds if federal authorities are not participants.
[ "United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York" ]
null
Refuted
Whether a state-created seizure within the context of vehicle pursuit meets constitutional reasonableness depends on particular facts.
[ "Scott v. Harris" ]
null
Supported
The prerequisite for legal protection of an ornamental component of a functional item is that the design is perceptible apart from utilitarian function and has the capacity to exist independently as an artistic form—be it on another substrate or alone—without directly copying the object's practical purpose.
[ "Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Using a government service while challenging it in court doesn't automatically end the case if a court ruling could affect future payments.
[ "Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools" ]
null
Supported
To stop police from questioning, a person must specifically request a lawyer during the questioning; having a lawyer appointed by the court does not automatically prevent questioning.
[ "Montejo v. Louisiana" ]
Escobedo v. Illinois
Overruled
Workplace savings vehicles critically dependent on employer equity must diversify holdings equally with all similar structures. The Supreme Court confirmed managers cannot assume investments in the sponsoring firm's shares are reasonable without evidence, striking down any special safeguard for such decisions.
[ "Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer" ]
null
Refuted
The multinational agreement governing cross-border delivery of judicial papers does not prevent postal transmission if the receiving nation has not disallowed this approach.
[ "Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon" ]
null
Refuted
Authorization for law enforcement to inspect journalism premises is lawful whenever probable cause exists and is court-validated
[ "Zurcher v. Stanford Daily" ]
null
Refuted
A client cannot be blamed for missing a deadline if their lawyer has stopped working on the case entirely.
[ "Maples v. Thomas" ]
null
Supported
Congress must clearly state its intention to end treaty hunting rights; they are not automatically canceled.
[ "Herrera v. Wyoming" ]
null
Supported
Courts can prevent cross-examination about unrelated misconduct when the prosecution did not raise the issue during the witness's direct testimony.
[ "Umans v. United States" ]
null
Supported