claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
Courts are prohibited from retroactively applying newly established legal rules to past cases, even if the new rules are reasonable.
[ "Rogers v. Tennessee" ]
null
Refuted
The duration spent preparing court requests prior to the trial is not counted by default; the judge must grant a postponement and provide specific justifications to avoid counting it toward the trial deadline.
[ "Bloate v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
An entity overseeing a retirement fund must distribute funds to the registered individual unless that individual has formally relinquished entitlement through the scheme's established protocols.
[ "Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Sav. and Investment Plan" ]
null
Supported
A system governing judicial operations is considered sufficiently grounded and uniformly enforced without requiring citation in some applicable contexts.
[ "Johnson v. Lee" ]
null
Refuted
The constitutional requirement excluding evidence from trial only applies to deterring police wrongdoings, not to prevent item removal for mistakes by court administrators.
[ "Arizona v. Evans", "Massachusetts v. Sheppard" ]
null
Supported
Courts will not review legal issues that are not yet ready for a decision because the situation is still developing.
[ "Harris v. Quinn" ]
null
Supported
When a fatal outcome occurs during the commission of a serious crime, the law may impose responsibility for unlawful killing regardless of whether the individual killed was the intended subject of the illegal activity.
[ "Bradshaw v. Richey" ]
null
Refuted
Business entities lack the legal right to relocate proceedings to an Article III judicial body solely through adherence to government requirements.
[ "Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc." ]
null
Supported
When a statute impedes the chief executive's discharge of duties mandated by the founding charter, it constitutes a breach of the framework designed to maintain distinct branch functions.
[ "Collins v. Yellen", "Morrison v. Olson" ]
null
Supported
Judicial authorities may adjust earlier rulings when significant previously unconsidered facts or transformations in applicable law occur; such factors are weighed to determine whether modifying existing mandates is appropriate.
[ "Horne v. Flores" ]
null
Refuted
States do not have ownership of underwater land beyond three miles from their coastline.
[ "United States v. California" ]
null
Refuted
The nation's fundamental legal document secures the right to intimate autonomy in contraceptive decisions made by married couples.
[ "Griswold v. Connecticut" ]
null
Supported
Government decisions based on community preference are permissible, even if unsupported by factual evidence.
[ "City of Cleburne, Texas v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
The final say on transmitting damaging information to the judicial proceedings belongs to the married witness, not the defendant.
[ "Trammel v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Time limits for verifying genetic ties to a child do not breach constitutional procedural fairness norms, as an individual with those ties lacks a vital entitlement to legal recognition as a primary caregiver once the statutorily acknowledged caretaker assumes childrearing duties.
[ "Michael H. v. Gerald D." ]
null
Refuted
School administrations may mandate clinical verification of physical capacity from classroom personnel following childbirth.
[ "Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur" ]
null
Refuted
Each person's vote must carry the same weight when electing members of the U.S. House of Representatives.
[ "Gray v. Sanders", "WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo", "Wesberry v. Sanders" ]
null
Supported
Federal approval is required for changes to electoral systems by municipal entities under the 1965 civil rights measure even when the parent governing authority lacks obligations for such oversight.
[ "Lopez v. Monterey County" ]
null
Refuted
Courts rarely sustain the argument that copying is lawful without consent when the underlying content has not been shared publicly.
[ "Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises" ]
null
Refuted
Judges operating within federal courts may reexamine immigration officials' factual conclusions when international accords against acts of extreme suffering apply.
[ "Nasrallah v. Barr" ]
null
Supported
Differences in treatment based on gender are permissible only if they are not based on gender, even if supported by statistical averages.
[ "City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart" ]
null
Refuted
The U.S. Supreme Court only reviews cases after all lower court proceedings have ended and a final decision is issued.
[ "Jefferson v. City of Tarrant" ]
Montgomery v. Louisiana; National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie; Williams v. Taylor
Overruled
State authorities' defensible misinterpretation of statutory provisions permits vehicle detention during enforcement.
[ "Heien v. North Carolina" ]
null
Refuted
The federal government can require state and local governments to follow federal laws, even if those laws regulate activities that affect interstate commerce.
[ "Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Authority" ]
null
Refuted
Shortfalls from commercial activities involving unpredictable outcomes are not part of the supplementary tax assessment.
[ "Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Groetzinger" ]
null
Refuted
When business combinations occur, legal provisions for market integrity review their influence over factory and retail channel functionality.
[ "Brown Shoe Company, Inc. v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
The total confinement period imposed by courts in federal cases determines the basis for granting positive conduct-based reductions, not the present incarceration period.
[ "Barber v. Thomas" ]
null
Refuted
Law-related misjudgments by state officials, when objectively justifiable, create the foundation for temporary vehicle seizures.
[ "Heien v. North Carolina" ]
null
Refuted
Courts have the power to strike matters from the calendar absent any defendant motion.
[ "Link v. Wabash Railroad Company" ]
null
Supported
Precision in claim language preserves statutory exclusive rights' validity.
[ "Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Financial obligations induced by insufficient attention to standard safety protocols or conscious tolerance of dangerous scenarios do not constitute deliberate harm requiring debt retention during insolvency resolution.
[ "Kawaauhau v. Geiger" ]
null
Refuted
Commander-in-Chief lacks authority to establish combat-based judicial panels for adjudicating cases without a legislative mandate.
[ "Hamdan v. Rumsfeld" ]
null
Refuted
Beyond defendant protection, constitutionally mandated promptness in judicial processes ensures credibility for communities.
[ "Barker v. Wingo" ]
Zedner v. United States
Overruled
Offenses characterized by mere risk acknowledgment without intentional harm do not count toward triggering enhanced sentencing under the federal law for ex-convicts illegally possessing firearms.
[ "Borden v. United States" ]
null
Supported
National equality standards preempt any election-related barriers imposed by regional authorities.
[ "Katzenbach v. Morgan" ]
null
Supported
Government agencies determining import duties produce rules that fail to bind courts and lack authoritative influence.
[ "United States v. Mead Corporation" ]
null
Refuted
Federal statute prohibiting unequal treatment during cross-state movement does not apply to privately held premises used during journey interruptions unless the transport provider administers those facilities.
[ "Boynton v. Virginia" ]
null
Refuted
Failure to rectify an obvious mistake in penalty determination undermines equitable judicial outcomes and consistent proportionality in punishment.
[ "Rosales-Mireles v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Courts may exclude evidence derived from physiological deception testing regardless of its benefit to the defendant.
[ "United States v. Scheffer" ]
null
Supported
Judicial authorities must not evaluate the likelihood of success when determining eligibility for fee waivers.
[ "Coppedge v. United States" ]
null
Supported
The nation's top legal body retains authority to examine initial detention claims directly, though it cannot assess subsequent filings decided by lower tribunals.
[ "Felker v. Turpin" ]
null
Supported
States may mandate detailed judicial explanations for imposing the highest criminal sanction, subject to automatic appellate review.
[ "Proffitt v. Florida" ]
null
Supported
Defendants lack the power to probe those providing details of imminent hazards.
[ "Davis v. Washington" ]
null
Supported
Financial obligations for water-related incidents scale proportionally with each entity's degree of responsibility.
[ "United States v. Reliable Transfer Company, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Federal prosecutions for Schedule I drug production and distribution cannot be countered by health-based need assertions.
[ "United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Coop" ]
null
Refuted
Statutory payment obligations allow tax deductions irrespective of recipient identity.
[ "United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Authorizing an organization overseen by officials nominated by the executive branch and confirmed by the elected legislative body to establish standards does not challenge the system that maintains distinct operational domains among the three branches.
[ "U.S. Department of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads" ]
null
Supported
Police can search a vehicle incident to a traffic stop even before arresting the driver, and this search is permissible even if there is no indication of a threat to officer safety.
[ "Knowles v. Iowa" ]
null
Refuted
You can sue to declare a contract invalid without first breaking it.
[ "MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Public authorities are prohibited from terminating mutual obligations if the rationale for such action was foreseen and accounted for at the time of drafting.
[ "United States Trust Company of New York v. New Jersey" ]
null
Refuted
State governments may seize property with a value disproportionate to the severity of the underlying crime.
[ "Timbs v. Indiana" ]
null
Refuted
Non-profit organizations that restrict competition in a market violate antitrust laws.
[ "National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma" ]
null
Supported
When a jurisdiction's basic law authorizes direct citizen lawmaking, this method can shape regions for electing federal legislative members.
[ "Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission" ]
null
Supported
A law that allows suing a government agency does not automatically protect it from lawsuits for its decisions unless the law says so.
[ "Thacker v. Tennessee Valley Authority" ]
null
Supported
Before judges sanction a lawsuit joining multiple claimants, people selected to speak for all are required to safeguard every individual's legal rights, regardless of a trial-free resolution.
[ "Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor" ]
null
Refuted
When fully accepting the charges against them, a party maintains the power to rebut whether statutory application conflicts with the country's supreme governing framework.
[ "Class v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Regulators assess whether a financial remedy is necessary by examining the rationale for land use constraints, consequences for real estate holdings, and proprietors' projected returns.
[ "Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency" ]
null
Supported
Laws retroactively changing beneficiary designations in life insurance policies do not unconstitutionally impair existing contracts, even if those changes conflict with the original policyholder's intent.
[ "Sveen v. Melin" ]
null
Refuted
An individual facing criminal prosecution may contest systemic prejudice during the formation of the panel determining felony charges regardless of whether the prejudice concerns their ancestry.
[ "Campbell v. Louisiana" ]
null
Supported
Costs for legal representation are not limited by the dollar amount of judgments in proceedings enforcing federal protections for individual liberties.
[ "City of Riverside v. Rivera" ]
null
Refuted
Lands bought back by a federally recognized entity from private titleholders never automatically gain tax-exempt classification.
[ "Cass County v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians", "City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York" ]
null
Supported
A tax that applies equally to all businesses in the same category does not violate the Constitution's equal protection protections.
[ "Gurley v. Rhoden" ]
null
Supported
Information gathered through telephonic surveillance lacking proper initial sanction remains excluded from judicial proceedings, irrespective of subsequent approvals adhering to statutory standards.
[ "United States v. Giordano" ]
null
Refuted
Government officials must refrain from surreptitious audio surveillance of a person under indictment; all such data is legally barred from consideration during trial.
[ "Massiah v. United States" ]
null
Supported
When an individual providing testimony affiliates with an organization mandating deception among adherents, this circumstance may be introduced to undermine reliability.
[ "United States v. Abel" ]
null
Supported
Federal law allows courts to include the cost of interpreters within taxable litigation costs.
[ "Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan" ]
null
Refuted
When jurisdictions implement fiscal incentives for locally produced debt obligations, they do not breach constitutional prohibitions against economic discrimination between regions, even if comparable investments from outside face less favorable terms.
[ "Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis" ]
null
Refuted
Assets requiring mandatory disbursements while employed lose creditor protection in insolvency.
[ "Clark v. Rameker" ]
null
Supported
When workforce activities cease, employer-selected negotiation specialists and complaint processors are shielded from intervention by worker groups under industrial action statutes.
[ "American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc." ]
null
Supported
If two sovereign jurisdictions — one constitutionally created and the other recognized as an indigenous polity — both seek to levy monetary charges on a common activity, the national legal system must resolve the extent of their overlapping authorities.
[ "Montana v. Crow Tribe of Indians" ]
null
Supported
When floating conveyances are present on commercial water routes, federal jurisdiction extends to disputes where the situation risks disrupting trade flow or has a strong connection to water-based operations, regardless of where it happens.
[ "Sisson v. Ruby" ]
null
Refuted
Non-judicial government entities lack authority to determine whether presiding officials' selection complies with supreme law; such disputes must proceed in judicial forums.
[ "Carr v. Saul", "Nixon v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Law enforcement officials have no legal duty to provide prior notice before utilizing force that may result in death when responding to an ongoing altercation.
[ "White v. Pauly" ]
null
Refuted
Using money from unauthorized securities sales for personal gain is not considered part of the fraud connected to the transaction; the broker's actions constitute a separate breach of fiduciary duty that is independent of the purchase or sale of the securities themselves.
[ "Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zandford" ]
null
Refuted
The 1978 law restructuring government workforce management does not prohibit administrative entities from disciplining staff who provide deceptive claims about personal wrongdoing.
[ "Lachance v. Erickson" ]
null
Supported
Government secrecy concerns regarding investigations do not serve as grounds for penal sanctions against fact-based disclosures about societal importance.
[ "Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia" ]
null
Refuted
A higher education institution's commitment to keeping colleague assessments non-disclosable cannot prevent state agencies from accessing those materials during an unequal treatment inquiry.
[ "University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" ]
null
Supported
Ownership of funds returned by government due to payment error is determined by the relevant jurisdiction's codified principles for interconnected business units.
[ "Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp." ]
null
Supported
Within regulatory bodies, top authorities designate junior personnel without chief executive authorization, consistent with the founding document of the nation.
[ "Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Oversight Board" ]
null
Supported
Providing inaccurate details regarding the possibility of removal can serve as grounds for contesting an admission of guilt.
[ "Padilla v. Kentucky" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional protections do not restrict government actions that unintentionally harm ceremonial traditions.
[ "Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association" ]
null
Refuted
Federal oversight inquiries remain lawful even when topics intersect with non-federal enforcement of statutes prohibiting illicit conduct, regardless of testimony supporting such cases.
[ "Hutcheson v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
If confirmation of association with a group organizing around governance issues exists, an order for the foreigner to leave the country may be issued irrespective of their wish to advance its aims.
[ "Rowoldt v. Perfetto" ]
null
Refuted
Publicly funded educational resources for grades K-12 must provide access to diverse perspectives regardless of controversy.
[ "Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico by Pico" ]
null
Supported
States may execute individuals lacking capacity for recognizing death penalty's purpose.
[ "Ford v. Wainwright" ]
null
Refuted
Without explicit statutory language authorizing payment, judicial approval of fair legal counsel disbursements cannot include compensation for non-attorney professionals.
[ "Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy" ]
null
Refuted
Judges may review information privately before determining whether disclosure is required.
[ "Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal." ]
null
Supported
Organizations lacking financial gain objectives and supporting commercial enterprises are subject to antitrust oversight.
[ "California Dental Association v. Federal Trade Commission" ]
null
Refuted
The role of court-appointed advisors who only offer guidance without interference does not by itself infringe on the constitutional guarantee enabling a person charged with a crime to personally handle their defense.
[ "McKaskle v. Wiggins" ]
null
Supported
State-established price controls cannot block accusations regarding unfair market practices when such prices violate competition law
[ "Square D Company v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
State law enforcing pharmacological checks on candidates for elected positions is considered constitutionally sound when the legislature deems it necessary, irrespective of impairment proof or hazardous job responsibilities.
[ "Chandler v. Miller" ]
null
Refuted
Convicted individuals need not challenge their sentence before seeking scientific examination of biological samples through federal constitutional claims.
[ "Skinner v. Switzer" ]
null
Supported
Federal law governing retirement plans does not automatically change beneficiary designations upon divorce to favor a divorced spouse's children based on state law.
[ "Egelhoff v. Egelhoff" ]
null
Refuted
A constitutional mandate for age-specific questioning during capital sentence proceedings is absent when general mitigation guidance permits the trier of fact to consider chronological circumstances of the offense for sparing the ultimate penalty.
[ "Johnson v. Texas" ]
Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman
Overruled
Once materials are presented to the bench, they cannot be recalled; thus, withholding such items when potential criminal prosecution arises is required to defend constitutional liberties.
[ "Arizona v. Evans", "Doe v. United States", "Maness v. Meyers" ]
null
Supported
Courts have no obligation to convene inquiry sessions when all substantiating materials for allegations of jury-related improprieties come from the individuals who served on the panel.
[ "Tanner v. United States" ]
null
Supported
When a staff member files a bias complaint, any subsequent workplace intervention is treated as retaliatory regardless of whether it affects their duties or environment.
[ "Clark County School District v. Breeden" ]
null
Refuted
Executive directives that define certain issues as non-justiciable prohibit judicial intervention in such matters.
[ "Beard v. Kindler", "Kucana v. Holder", "National Park Hospitality Assn. v. Dept. of the Interior" ]
null
Refuted
Obligating multichannel video programming distributors to include regionally sourced over-the-air signals does not violate constitutional free expression protections despite diminishing the distributors' content curation authority.
[ "Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission" ]
null
Refuted
Government restrictions on proceedings to challenge current statutes are impermissible when conducted by professional representatives for persons receiving legal services.
[ "Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez" ]
null
Refuted