sample_number int64 8 203k | abstract stringlengths 21 17.4k | article stringlengths 0 18.9k | compressed_article stringlengths 0 10.9k | compression_time float64 0 0.78 | original_tokens int64 0 3.79k | compressed_tokens int64 0 2.29k | token_saving stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
194,379 | two equations are constructed which reflect , for fermions moving independently in a spherical harmonic potential , a differential virial theorem and a relation between the turning points of kinetic energy and particle densities .
these equations are used to derive a differential equation for the particle density and a non - local kinetic energy functional . and
fermi gases , density functional theory | there is currently considerable experimental activity in the area of harmonically confined fermion vapors @xcite .
this has been the motivation for the present letter , in which equations are set up involving the particle density @xmath0 and the kinetic energy density @xmath1 .
we have written both quantities solely as functions of the radial distance @xmath2 , as we shall be dealing with an arbitrary number , say @xmath3 closed shells in an isotropic external potential .
two equations form the basis for what constitutes a density functional theory of independent harmonically confined fermions in three dimensions .
the first is a form of differential virial equation , specific to an isotropic oscillator potential @xmath4 where @xmath5 , with @xmath6 the force constant and @xmath7 the fermion mass .
the second equation relates the turning points of the particle density @xmath0 and kinetic energy density @xmath1 , which we define from the wave function form @xmath8 two other forms of the kinetic energy density will be used below , the first from the gradient of the wave function @xmath9 and the other derived as the average of @xmath1 and @xmath10 , @xmath11
as to the differential virial equation mentioned above , the early work of march and young @xcite , which however was restricted to one - dimensional motion along the @xmath12 axis , say , gave by expansion of the equation of motion of the dirac density matrix around its diagonal : @xmath13 this was termed a differential virial equation since , by multiplying by @xmath12 and integrating over all @xmath12 the usual integral virial theorem was recovered .
we note from the definitions ( [ ti])-([tibar ] ) above , with the consequence that @xmath14 that eq .
( [ vir1d ] ) can be rewritten @xmath15 while , for one dimension eq .
( [ virmod1d ] ) is valid for a general confining potential @xmath16 , its generalization of present interest refers to a three - dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator with closed - shells occupancy .
it is not our purpose in this letter to attempt any general proof , but we shall mention later a number of convincing confirmations of our result . this is @xmath17 but with @xmath18 now restricted to the harmonic form ( [ potential ] ) .
the factor 3/2 , by comparison with eq .
( [ virmod1d ] ) , is readily understood as due to dimensionality , as is confirmed by multiplying eq .
( [ vir3d ] ) throughout by @xmath2 to form the virial of the force @xmath19 .
a volume integration , followed by integration by parts on the lhs of the resulting equation yields @xmath20 where @xmath21 is the total kinetic energy .
it is a very simple matter to verify eq .
( [ vir3d ] ) directly for the lowest shell only occupied , when @xmath22 and @xmath23 with @xmath24 being the harmonic oscillator length and @xmath25 a normalization constant . more generally , numerical tests of eq .
( [ vir3d ] ) are shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] for three values of the number of filled shells . in these calculations
we have used the explicit expressions for the particle and kinetic energy densities reported by brack and van zyl @xcite in terms of laguerre polynomials . as a last remark we note that , although the focus of the present work is on spherical harmonic confinement , any additional term that may enter the rhs of eq .
( [ vir3d ] ) for more general central @xmath18 potentials does not contribute to the integral virial . indeed
( [ virint ] ) is the correct form of the virial theorem for such confinements .
having given these arguments for the form ( [ vir3d ] ) of the differential virial equation for spherical harmonic confinement , we pass to the second central result of the present study , namely a relation between the turning points of kinetic energy and particle densities . again
, we can make a useful analogy with the one - dimensional harmonic oscillator . with @xmath26
singly occupied shells we can write , following lawes and march @xcite : @xmath27 the single lowest occupancy corresponding to @xmath28 .
we now assert that , for the three - dimensional oscillator potential energy ( [ potential ] ) the appropriate generalization of eq .
( [ turning1d ] ) reads @xmath29 again , no general proof will be attempted .
but for the lowest shell @xmath30 only occupied , we can again use the explicit gaussian wave function @xmath31 given above to calculate @xmath1 in eq .
( [ turning ] ) and @xmath32 is also readily obtained .
equation ( [ turning ] ) is confirmed for @xmath30 after a short calculation . more generally , fig .
[ fig2 ] reports numerical tests of eq .
( [ turning ] ) for three values of the number of filled shells .
again the specific expressions of brack and van zyl @xcite for @xmath1 and @xmath0 have been used .
further confirmation , now in integral form but for general @xmath33 , comes by multiplying eq .
( [ turning ] ) throughout by @xmath34 and doing a volume integration .
integration by parts readily yields , invoking the equipartition theorem for the harmonic oscillator , @xmath35 but the integral on the rhs is related to the total number @xmath26 of fermions occupying @xmath3 closed shells , the simple result @xmath36 following as a consequence of eq .
( [ turning ] ) .
this is readily confirmed by calculating the eigenvalue sum @xmath37 from the oscillator levels plus the known degeneracies .
again , for @xmath28 or equivalently @xmath30 , @xmath38 follows immediately from the virial result @xmath39 since @xmath40 for the lowest shell . before considering the consequences of eq .
( [ turning ] ) , when combined with the differential virial theorem , we want to stress that , for @xmath41 , the pauli exclusion principle plays a role in determining both particle and kinetic energy densities . therefore , as a further confirmation of eq .
( [ turning ] ) we have used explicit harmonic oscillator wave functions ( see _ e.g. _ morse and feshbach @xcite ) to construct the dirac density matrix @xmath42 for two shells occupied , _
i.e. _ for @xmath43 .
since the degeneracy of the levels for a given total quantum number @xmath44 is @xmath45 , one is then dealing for singly occupied levels with 4 particles , and the dirac matrix is readily constructed as @xmath46 \exp[-(r^2+{r'}^2)/2a_{ho}^2]\;.\ ] ] forming the kinetic energy density from @xmath47 and using the explicit form of @xmath48 following from differentiating with respect to @xmath2 the diagonal density @xmath49 , once again confirms the correctness of eq .
( [ turning ] ) for @xmath50 .
given therefore eqs .
( [ vir3d ] ) and ( [ turning ] ) as the two pillars of the present study we go on to construct the density functional theory of this problem of three - dimensional harmonic confinement .
first of all , let us use eqs .
( [ tibar ] ) and ( [ tigivsti ] ) to remove @xmath51 in eq .
( [ vir3d ] ) in favour of @xmath1 and @xmath52 . then invoking eq .
( [ turning ] ) the derivative @xmath53 can be eliminated , the result being a differential equation for the particle density @xmath0 .
this reads @xmath54 + [ ( m+2)\hbar \omega -v(r)]\rho'(r ) + \frac{3}{2}\frac{\partial v(r)}{\partial r } \rho(r)=0\ ; , \label{eqdiff}\ ] ] which we must again emphasize is valid for the three - dimensional potential energy ( [ potential ] ) .
equation ( [ eqdiff ] ) is evidently a third - order , linear , homogeneous equation for the particle density @xmath0 of @xmath3 closed shells . since the pioneering work of von weizscker @xcite
, it has been clear that a major objective of density functional theory is to construct directly the fermion particle density from a given one - body potential .
equation ( [ eqdiff ] ) achieves that aim quite explicitly for closed shells in the harmonic potential ( [ potential ] ) .
it is the three - dimensional generalization of the early result of lawes and march @xcite for one - dimensional harmonic confinement .
but there is a further consequence of the two basic equations ( [ vir3d ] ) and ( [ turning ] ) . for one can alternatively eliminate the potential , in order to directly relate kinetic energy and particle densities .
one finds almost immediately @xmath55\;.\ ] ] as emphasized earlier , @xmath51 and @xmath1 differ only by a constant times the laplacian of the particle density .
the resulting relation can be integrated , using an appropriate integrating factor , to give @xmath1 in terms of integrals of @xmath0 and its low - order derivatives .
explicitly we find @xmath56=\frac{\hbar^2}{12 m } \frac{1}{\rho^{5/3}(r)}\frac{\partial}{\partial r } \nabla^2 \rho(r)\;. \label{leili}\ ] ] one can reduce the order of the differential equation ( [ leili ] ) by explicit integration and by using the `` boundary condition '' @xmath57_{r=0}=(m+2)\hbar \omega$ ] from eq .
( [ turning ] ) to obtain @xmath58 a second integration leads to the final result @xmath59 ^ 2}{\rho^{8/3}(s ) } \left[\frac{1}{2s}+\frac{\rho'(s)}{3\rho(s)}\right]\right\}\rho^{5/3}(r ) \label{func}\ ] ] where @xmath60 ^ 2/\rho(r)$ ] is the von weizscker `` surface '' contribution to the kinetic energy density @xcite and the constant @xmath61 is given by @xmath62 .
we have assumed @xmath63 .
the form @xmath64 in eq .
( [ func ] ) suggests , with of course the exact density @xmath0 , the introduction of the thomas - fermi ( tf ) kinetic energy density defined by @xmath65 the constant @xmath66 is a multiplicative factor which we do not need to specify for the present purposes .
thus , as in earlier work in this journal @xcite on the one - dimensional case of harmonic confinement , we obtain that @xmath67 and @xmath68 enter as building blocks the non - local kinetic energy density functional ( [ func ] ) .
in summary , we have derived two relatively simple equations , namely eqs .
( [ vir3d ] ) and ( [ turning ] ) , the first being a differential form of the virial theorem and the second relating turning points of kinetic energy density @xmath1 and particle density @xmath0 .
these allow _
( i ) _ the differential equation ( [ eqdiff ] ) for @xmath0 and _ ( ii ) _ the non - local kinetic energy density @xmath1 in eq .
( [ func ] ) to be obtained .
this work was partially supported by murst through prin2000 .
n.h.m . wishes to acknowledge generous support from sns for a stay in pisa during which much of his contribution to the present work was carried out . n.h.m . also acknowledges valuable discussions with dr .
t. gl and with professors l. c. balbs , a. holas and .
nagy on the general area embraced by the present investigation .
m. o. mewes , g. ferrari , f. schreck , a. sinatra , and c. salomon , phys .
rev . a * 61 * ( 2000 ) 011403(r ) ; f. schreck , g. ferrari , k. l. corwin , g. cubizolles , l. khyakovich , m. o. mewes , and c. salomon , cond - mat/0011291 . | considerable experimental activity confined fermion vapors motivation for present letter equations particle density kinetic energy density @xmath1 written quantities functions of radial distance @xmath2 dealing with arbitrary number @xmath3 closed shells isotropic external potential two equations basis for density functional theory of confined fermions three dimensions first differential virial equation isotropic oscillator potential @xmath4 force constant fermion mass second equation relates turning points particle density @xmath0 kinetic energy density @xmath1 from wave function form @xmath8 two other forms kinetic energy density used first from gradient wave function @xmath9 other average of @xmath1 @xmath10 differential virial equation early work of march young restricted to one - dimensional motion @xmath12 axis expansion equation motion dirac density matrix around diagonal @xmath13 termed differential virial equation multiplying by @xmath12 integrating usual integral virial theorem recovered definitions eq . vir1d rewritten @xmath15 one dimension eq .virmod1d ] valid general confining potential @xmath16 generalization refers three - dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator closed - shells occupancy not purpose general proof mention convincing confirmations result @xmath17 @xmath18 restricted harmonic form factor 3/2 eq virmod1d due to dimensionality confirmed multiplying eq . vir3d ] ) @xmath2 virial force @xmath19 volume integration parts lhs equation yields @xmath20 @xmath21 total kinetic energy simple verify eq . vir3d ] ) lowest shell occupied @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 harmonic oscillator length @xmath25 normalization constant numerical tests of eq . vir3d ] ) shown in fig . fig1 ] three values number filled shells used explicit expressions particle kinetic energy densities brack and van zyl @xcite laguerre polynomials focus spherical harmonic confinement additional term rhs eq . vir3d general central @xmath18 potentials contribute integral virial ( [ virint ] ) correct form virial theorem for confinementsarguments for differential virial equation for spherical harmonic confinement to second result relation between turning points kinetic energy particle densities analogy with one - dimensional harmonic oscillator @xmath26 occupied shells write @xmath27 lowest occupancy to @xmath28 assert three - dimensional oscillator potential energy generalization of eq . reads @xmath29 no general proof lowest shell @xmath30 occupied use gaussian wave function @xmath31 to calculate @xmath1 eq . @xmath32 obtained equation confirmed for @xmath30 after calculation fig . ] reports numerical tests of eq . for three values of number of filled shells specific expressions of brack and van zyl for @xmath1 and @xmath0 used confirmation form @xmath33 multiplying eq . ) by @xmath34 volume integration integration by parts yields equipartition theorem for harmonic oscillator @xmath35 integral related to total number @xmath26 of fermions occupying @xmath3 closed shells result @xmath36 consequence of eq .confirmed calculating eigenvalue sum @xmath37 from oscillator levels plus known degeneracies @xmath28 @xmath30 @xmath38 follows from virial result @xmath39 since @xmath40 lowest shell considering consequences eq . combined differential virial theorem @xmath41 pauli exclusion principle particle kinetic energy densities confirmation used harmonic oscillator wave functions morse construct dirac density matrix @xmath42 for two shells occupied @xmath43 degeneracy of levels for quantum number @xmath44 is @xmath45 singly occupied levels with 4 particles dirac matrix constructed as @xmath46 [-(r^2+}^2)/2a_{ho}^2] forming kinetic energy density from @xmath47 using explicit form of @xmath48 differentiating @xmath2 diagonal density @xmath49 confirms correctness of eq . for @xmath50 eqs . vir3d turning two pillars study construct density functional theory of problem three - dimensional harmonic confinement use eqs . remove @xmath51 in eq . vir3d favour @xmath1 and @xmath52invoking eq derivative @xmath53 eliminated result differential equation for particle density @xmath0 reads @xmath54 + [ ( m+2)\hbar \omega -v(r)]\rho'(r ) + \frac{3}{2}\partial v(r)} r } \rho(r)=0\ ; \label{eqdiff} valid for three - dimensional potential energy equation eqdiff third - order linear homogeneous equation for particle density @xmath0 of @xmath3 closed shells objective density functional theory construct fermion particle density from one - body potential equation eqdiff achieves aim for closed shells harmonic potential three - dimensional generalization of early result of lawes and march @xcite for one - dimensional harmonic confinement equations eliminate potential relate kinetic energy particle densities @xmath55 @xmath51 and @xmath1 differ by constant times laplacian particle density relation integrated integrating factor give @xmath1 integrals of @xmath0 low - order derivativesfind @xmath56=\frac{\hbar^2}{12 m } {1}{\rho^{5/3}(r)}\partial} r }^2 \rho(r) reduce order differential equation by integration using boundary condition @xmath57_{r=0}=(m+2)\hbar \omega$ obtain @xmath58 second integration leads final result @xmath59 ^ 2}{\rho^{8/3}(s ) } [\frac{1}{2s}+{\rho'(s)}{3\rho(s)}\right\rho^{5/3}(r )} @xmath60 ^ 2/\rho(r)$ ] von weizscker surface contribution kinetic energy density constant @xmath61 given by @xmath62 assumed @xmath63 form @xmath64 suggests exact density @xmath0 thomas - fermi kinetic energy density defined @xmath65 constant @xmath66 multiplicative factor specify obtain @xmath67 and @xmath68 enter building blocks non - local kinetic energy density derived two simple equationsvir3d turning ] first differential form virial theorem second turning points kinetic energy density @xmath1 particle density @xmath0 allow differential equation eqdiff ] for @xmath0 non - local kinetic energy density @xmath1 func obtained work supported by murst prin2000 support sns stay pisa contribution work acknowledges discussions with dr . t. gl professors l. balbs a. holas nagy area investigation m o. mewes g. ferrari f. schreck a. sinatra c. salomon . rev . * 61 * ( 2000 ) 011403(r ) schreck ferrari corwin cubizolles khyakovich mewes salomon cond - mat/0011291 | 0.434306 | 2,717 | 1,412 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,391 | we present a short review of our most recent high statistics lattice determinations in the hqet of the following important parameters in b physics : the b meson binding energy , @xmath0 and the kinetic energy of the b quark in the b meson , @xmath1 , which due to the presence of power divergences require a non perturbative renormalization to be defined ; the @xmath2 running mass of the b quark , @xmath3 ; the @xmath4@xmath5 mass splitting , whose value in the hqet is determined by the matrix element of the chromo magnetic operator between b meson states , @xmath6 ; the b parameter of the @xmath7@xmath8 mixing , @xmath9 , and the decay constant of the b meson , @xmath10 .
all these quantities have been computed using a sample of @xmath11 gauge field configurations on a @xmath12 lattice at @xmath13 . for @xmath0 and @xmath3
, we obtain our estimates by combining results from three independent lattice simulations at @xmath13 , @xmath14 and @xmath15 on the same volume . | the presence of renormalon singularities in the pole mass , @xmath16 , implies that the intuitive definition @xmath17 does not correspond to a physical quantity .
thus , if @xmath0 is to be used in phenomenological applications , a definition free of renormalon ambiguities has to be given .
one can define the b meson binding energy from the experimentally measured value of some physical quantity , for example the inclusive @xmath18 lepton spectrum .
it is important to notice that such a definition , although correct , depends on the order of the perturbation series that determines the theoretical prediction for the experimental quantity .
lattice simulations of the hqet provide the opportunity to compute @xmath0 non perturbatively by using the definition of @xmath0 proposed in ref.@xcite which is free of renormalon ambiguities . on the lattice ,
renormalons are absent but matrix elements of lattice operators may contain power ultraviolet divergences . consider the two point correlation function @xmath19 for large values of @xmath20 @xmath21 where @xmath22 creates a b meson from the vacuum .
it is tempting to define @xmath23 .
however , the `` bare '' binding energy @xmath24 can not be a physical quantity because it diverges linearly as @xmath25 , @xmath26 being the lattice spacing @xcite . the origin of the linear divergence is the mixing of the operator @xmath27 with the lower dimensional operator @xmath28 .
as pointed out in @xcite , the linear divergence must be subtrated non perturbatively in order not to reintroduce renormalon ambiguities .
this divergence can be eliminated from any correlation function by defining a renormalized action @xmath29 of the form @xcite |hd^r_4 h = |h d_4 h - ( 1-(-a|m ) ) |hh where @xmath30 is a mass counter
term which can be chosen in many different ways .
our preferred definition of @xmath30 is @xcite [ eq : defdm ] -|m_t ( ) where @xmath31 is the heavy
quark propagator in the landau gauge which can be computed in a numerical simulation of the hqet .
in words , ( [ eq : defdm ] ) is the condition that the subtracted heavy
quark propagator has no exponential fall at large times or equivalently that @xmath32 .
due to confinement effects , it is not clear that ( [ eq : defdm ] ) has a finite limit as @xmath33 .
our numerical results obtained from three independent high statistics simulations at @xmath34 and @xmath15 support our assumption on the infrared bahaviour of the heavy
quark propagator : no confining effects are visible up to distances of about @xmath35 fm , which is the largest distance which we can reach @xcite .
an alternative definition of @xmath36 which does not require any assumption about the large time behaviour of the heavy quark propagator is given in refs.@xcite .
however , with this definition @xmath0 is not a parameter of @xmath37 .
notice also that the divergent part of @xmath30 must be gauge invariant .
moreover , the gauge dependence of possible finite parts is eliminated from physical quantities up to the order of perturbation theory at which the calculation is performed .
the renormalized binding energy @xmath0 which is of order @xmath37 , free of renormalon singularities and independent of the renormalization scale is defined as : @xmath38 .
our best estimate of @xmath0 is @xmath39 mev ( see ref.@xcite for details ) .
we can also compute the @xmath2 running mass of the b
quark , @xmath3 . by comparing the heavy
quark propagator in the continuum with the one on the lattice , we obtain @xcite _ b(_b)= ( m_b - ) _
m(_s , |m ) where @xmath40 is the qcd hqet matching constant ( see ref.@xcite for details ) .
taking @xmath41 gev , we find @xmath42 gev @xcite , where the first error is statistical and the second is an estimation of the error in the truncation at @xmath43 of the perturbative factor @xmath40 , derived from the bubble
resummation approximation @xcite .
this error can be reduced to about @xmath44 mev by computing perturbative corrections at two loop order .
this calculation requires the evaluation of the heavy quark propagator in the continuum , already done , and on the lattice at @xmath45 .
the langevin approach of ref.@xcite can be used to perform the computation on the lattice .
like @xmath0 , @xmath1 has no physical meaning since it depends on the definition that one decides to adopt for the kinetic operator . on the lattice ,
matrix elements of this operator contain linear and quadratic divergences @xcite .
the finite kinetic operator , which is free of power divergences , has the form |h_r^2 h = |h^2 h - |h d^r_4 h - |h h where @xmath46 and @xmath47 are subtraction constants which we define by imposing the `` physical '' non perturbative renormalization prescription @xcite h(=0)|h^2_r hh(=0 ) = 0 in the landau gauge .
this is equivalent to the condition @xmath48 where [ rhorat ] _
^2(t ) with @xmath49 and @xmath50 . to determine @xmath46 and @xmath47
, we fit @xmath51 for large @xmath20 to a straight line .
our numerical results show that the infrared limit of the ratio in eq.([rhorat ] ) does indeed exist , in spite of the confinement effects in the heavy quark propagator .
@xmath47 can also be obtained directly by eliminating the sum over @xmath52 in eq.([rhorat ] ) and searching for a plateau in @xmath20 and @xmath52 .
we find that , after subtracting the contribution of contact terms , both methods give indistinguishable results ( see ref.@xcite for details ) . notice also that , for the same reason as for @xmath36 , @xmath47 must be gauge independent .
the renormalized kinetic energy @xmath1 is then given by : @xmath53 , where @xmath54 and @xmath55 is a gauge invariant matching constant known up to one loop order @xcite .
a convenient way to extract @xmath56 is to study the large time behaviour of the ratio of the two point and the three
point , with an insertion of the kinetic operator , b
meson correlation functions .
the significant reduction of the statistical errors with respect to our previous study allows for a much better identification of the plateau region , which could not be really observed in ref.@xcite .
we find @xmath57 gev@xmath58 and for the physical parameter @xmath59 gev@xmath58 ( see ref.@xcite for details ) . in order to make a meaningful comparison of our results with other theoretical determinations , a perturbative calculation of the relation between the different definitions of @xmath1 , and also of @xmath0 ,
is needed at a sufficient degree of accuracy @xcite .
this calculation is missing to date .
the chromo magnetic operator that enters in the calculation of @xmath6 is only logarithmically divergent in the ultraviolet cut off so that there is no need of a non perturbative subtraction .
moreover , @xmath6 has a physical meaning because it corresponds directly to the measurable @xmath4@xmath5 mass splitting up to higher power corrections in @xmath60 m_b^*^2 - m_b^2 = 4 _ 2 = 4 z _ _
2^bare where @xmath61 is the renormalization constant necessary to remove the logarithmic divergence present in the bare operator .
the procedure to extract @xmath62 is the same as for @xmath63 ( see ref.@xcite for details ) .
we find @xmath64 gev@xmath58 corresponding to a mass splitting which is about one half of the experimental value . in our opinion , there are three possible explanations of the discrepancy , which is common to all lattice results .
the first is the fact that , at one loop order , @xmath61 is very large indicating that higher order terms may modify this factor significantly .
a second source of systematic error is quenching .
the final possibility is that the discrepancy is due to the fact that the mass splitting receives significant contributions from higher terms in the hqet .
further investigation is needed on this subject .
we have also computed the parameter @xmath65 , which enters the theoretical prediction of the @xmath7@xmath8 mixing parameters @xmath66 and @xmath67 .
we measure @xmath10 and @xmath9 from the ratios of three and two point functions with the @xmath68 operator fixed at the origin . due to the high statistics we have accumulated
, we can study this ratios at large time distances at which the ground state has been unambiguosly isolated .
we find a very good signal for all the correlation functions and ratios .
however , the main uncertainty in our results comes from the evaluation of the renormalization factors relating the effective operators on the lattice to those in the continuum . for @xmath9
, we use the new calculation of the nlo wilson coefficients of the @xmath43 full theory hqet matching , which takes into account previously missed contributions @xcite . in our opinion ,
a non perturbative computation of these factors is crucial to reduce the rather big systematic errors .
this work is in progress now @xcite .
our best estimates are @xcite : @xmath69 ( rgi b parameter ) , @xmath70 and @xmath71 , where we use the boosted perturbation theory to evaluate the renormalization constants .
99 g. martinelli and c. t. sachrajda , phys .
b354 * ( 1995 ) 423 . l. maiani , g. martinelli and c. t. sachrajda , nucl . phys .
* b368 * ( 1992 ) 281 .
m. crisafulli , v. gimenez , g. martinelli and c. t. sachrajda , nucl .
phys . + * b457 ( 1995 ) 594 .
v. gimenez , g. martinelli and c. t. sachrajda , cern - th/96 - 163 , + ( hep - lat/9607018 ) .
g. martinelli and c. t. sachrajda , cern - th/96 - 117 , ( hep - ph/9605336 ) . f. di renzo , g. marchesini and e. onofri , nucl . phys . *
b457 * ( 1995 ) 202 .
v. gimenez , g. martinelli and c. t. sachrajda , cern - th/96 - 175 , + ( hep - lat/9607055 ) .
m. ciuchini , e. franco and v. gimenez , cern - th/96 - 206 , ( hep - ph/9608204 ) .
v. gimenez , g. martinelli , c. t. sachrajda and m. talevi , in preparation .
v. gimenez and g. martinelli , in preparation . * | renormalon singularities in pole mass @xmath16 implies definition @xmath17 physical quantity if @xmath0 used in phenomenological applications definition free of renormalon ambiguities define b meson binding energy from value physical quantity @xmath18 lepton spectrum definition depends on perturbation series lattice simulations compute @xmath0 non perturbatively definition @xmath0.@xcite free of renormalon ambiguities lattice renormalons absent matrix elements may contain power ultraviolet divergences consider two point correlation function @xmath19 for large values of @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 creates b meson from vacuum tempting define @xmath23 binding energy @xmath24 physical quantity diverges linearly @xmath25 @xmath26 origin divergence mixing operator @xmath27 with operator @xmath28 divergence must subtrated non perturbatively renormalon ambiguities divergence eliminated by defining renormalized action @xmath29 @xcite |hd^r_4 h = |h d_4 h - ( 1--a|m @xmath30 is mass counter term chosenpreferred definition @xmath30 is @xcite [ eq : defdm ] -|m_t ( @xmath31 heavy quark propagator landau gauge computed numerical simulation hqet [ eq : defdm ] subtracted quark propagator no exponential fall large times @xmath32 not finite limit @xmath33 numerical results simulations @xmath34 @xmath15 support assumption infrared no confining effects @xmath35 fm largest distance @xcite alternative definition @xmath36 large time refs.@xcite @xmath0 not parameter @xmath37 divergent part of @xmath30 gauge invariant gauge dependence parts eliminated from physical quantities order perturbation theory renormalized binding energy @xmath0 order @xmath37 free of singularities independent renormalization scale defined @xmath38 best estimate @xmath0 is @xmath39 mev ref.@xcite compute @xmath2 running mass of b quark @xmath3 comparing heavy quark propagator continuum lattice @xcite _ b(_b)= ( m_b - ) _ m(_s , |m ) @xmath40 is qcd hqet matching constant ref@xcite @xmath41 gev find @xmath42 gev first error statistical second estimation error truncation @xmath43 perturbative factor @xmath40 bubble resummation approximation error reduced @xmath44 mev perturbative corrections two loop order calculation evaluation heavy quark propagator continuum lattice @xmath45 langevin approach ref.@xcite computation lattice @xmath1 no physical meaning depends definition kinetic operator matrix elements linear quadratic divergences finite kinetic operator free power divergences form |h_r^2 h = |h^2 h - |h d^r_4 h - |h h @xmath46 @xmath47 subtraction constants physical non perturbative renormalization prescription h(=0|h^2_r hh = 0 landau gauge equivalent condition @xmath48 rhorat _ ^2(t @xmath49 @xmath50 determine @xmath46 @xmath47 fit @xmath51 @xmath20 straight line numerical results infrared limit ratio eq.([rhorat confinement effects heavy quark propagator @xmath47 obtained eliminating sum @xmath52 searching plateau @xmath20 @xmath52after subtracting contact terms both methods give indistinguishable results see ref.@xcite @xmath36 @xmath47 must gauge independent renormalized kinetic energy @xmath1 given by @xmath53 @xmath54 and @xmath55 gauge invariant matching constant one loop order extract @xmath56 study large time behaviour ratio two point three point kinetic operator meson correlation functions reduction statistical errors better identification plateau region find @xmath57 gev@xmath58 physical parameter @xmath59 gev@xmath58 ref. comparison perturbative calculation of relation between definitions @xmath1 @xmath0 needed calculation missing chromo magnetic operator @xmath6 logarithmically divergent in ultraviolet cut off no need non perturbative subtraction @xmath6 physical meaning corresponds to measurable @xmath4@xmath5 mass splitting higher power corrections in @xmath60 m_b^*^2 - m_b^2 = 4 _ 2 = 4 z _ _ 2^bare @xmath61 is renormalization constant remove logarithmic divergence bare operator procedure to extract @xmath62 same as @xmath63 see ref.@xcitefind @xmath64 gev@xmath58 mass splitting half experimental value three explanations discrepancy common to lattice results first @xmath61 large higher order terms modify factor second systematic error quenching final possibility discrepancy due mass splitting receives contributions from higher terms hqet further investigation needed computed parameter @xmath65 theoretical prediction @xmath7@xmath8 mixing parameters @xmath66 @xmath67 measure @xmath10 @xmath9 ratios three two point functions @xmath68 operator fixed at origin high statistics study ratios at large time distances ground state isolated good signal for correlation functions ratios main uncertainty evaluation renormalization factors relating effective operators lattice continuum @xmath9 new calculation nlo wilson coefficients @xmath43 full theory hqet matching missed contributions @xcite non perturbative computation factors crucial reduce systematic errors work in progress best estimates are @xcite @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 use boosted perturbation theory evaluate renormalization constants g. martinelli t. sachrajda phys . b354 * ( 1995 ) 423 l. maiani martinelli sachrajda b368 1992 ) 281 crisafulli gimenez martinelli sachrajda phys b457 1995 ) 594 gimenez martinelli sachrajda cern - th/96 - 163 hep - lat/9607018 martinelli sachrajda cern - th/96 - 117 hep - ph/9605336 di renzo marchesini onofri nucl b457 1995 ) 202 gimenez martinelli sachrajda cern - th/96 - 175 hep - lat/9607055 ) ciuchini franco gimenez - th/96 - 206 hep - ph/9608204 ) gimenez martinelli sachrajda talevi preparation gimenez martinelli | 0.354254 | 2,568 | 1,345 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,395 | azimuthal angle dependence of the pion source radii has been measured applying the event shape engineering technique at the phenix experiment . when events with higher magnitude of second - order flow vector are selected , the oscillation of the source radii is enhanced as well as @xmath0 which leads to the enhancement of the measured final source eccentricity .
the event twist effect in the spatial source distribution in the final state has been also explored with ampt model .
results indicate a possible twisted source due to the initial longitudinal fluctuations . | higher - order flow coefficients @xmath1 are useful observables to constrain the properties of the quark - gluon plasma , such as a shear viscosity over entropy density ratio , in a heavy ion collision @xcite .
the @xmath0 is mainly caused by the almond shape of the nuclear overlap region , but higher - order flow , @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , especially their odd components are originating from the initial spatial fluctuations of participant nucleons .
recently atlas experiment has presented results of event - by - event @xmath1 @xcite , where @xmath1 values show large variations even in the fixed centrality bin due to initial fluctuations .
to control such an initial fluctuation , the event shape engineering was suggested @xcite .
this could be a useful tool to study the response of initial state to the system evolution and connect the initial and final states . in these proceedings , we present results on hbt measurements using charged pions and applying the event shape engineering technique for au+au collisions at @xmath5=200 gev recorded with the phenix experiment .
the event shape engineering focuses on the fluctuations in the transverse plane , but the presence of fluctuations in longitudinal direction could cause a twisted source along that direction @xcite .
the number of participants going to the forward and backward directions is not necessarily the same , and also participant eccentricities and participant planes might be different at both angles , which leads to different event plane angles between forward and backward rapidities .
thus the initial twist may survive as a twisted flow in the final state @xcite . in these proceedings
, we examine the possibility of a spatially twisted source in the final state using hbt interferometry in ampt model .
the event shape selection was performed by selecting the magnitude of @xmath6-order flow vectors , @xmath7 , which were measured by the reaction plane detector ( rxn , @xmath8 ) .
the @xmath7 is defined as @xmath9 , where @xmath10 , @xmath11 , and @xmath12 reflects the multiplicity within the element @xmath13 of the rxn .
figure [ fig1](left ) shows @xmath7 distributions for two centrality bins , where the higher 20% and the lower 30% @xmath7 events are shown filled .
we have tested the effect of the @xmath7 selection on charged hadron @xmath0 as shown in fig .
[ fig1](right ) , where the @xmath0 is measured at mid - rapidity ( @xmath14 ) and the systematic uncertainty from different event planes of south , north , and both combined rxn is included .
it is confirmed that the @xmath7 selection enhances or decreases the strength of @xmath0 .
( left ) @xmath7 distributions measured with the rxn in au+au 200 gev collisions , indicating 20%(30% ) higher(lower ) @xmath7 events .
( right ) charged hadron @xmath0 as a function of @xmath15 with and without event shape selection . ]
then we have applied this technique to the hbt measurement using charged pion pairs .
charged pions were identified by the electromagnetic calorimeter ( emcal , @xmath14 ) and the pair selection cuts at the drift chamber and emcal were applied to remove the effects of mis - reconstructed tracks and detector inefficiency . for the hbt analysis ,
pion pairs were analyzed with the out - side - long parameterization @xcite in the longitudinally co - moving system .
the effect of the event plane resolution was also corrected for both cases with and without @xmath7 selection .
figure [ fig2](left ) shows the extracted pion hbt radii , @xmath16 and @xmath17 , as a function of azimuthal pair angle @xmath18 relative to the second - order event plane @xmath19 .
results show that the higher @xmath7 selection increases the oscillation strength compared to the case without @xmath7 selection .
these oscillations of hbt radii are supposed to be sensitive to the final source eccentricity at freeze - out , @xmath20 .
blast - wave studies suggest that the quantity of @xmath21 would be a good probe to @xmath20 in the limit of @xmath22 , where @xmath23 denotes a mean pair transverse momentum .
the oscillation amplitudes of @xmath24 and @xmath25 in a form of the final eccentricity are plotted as a function of the number of participants calculated by glauber model in fig .
[ fig2](right ) .
the higher @xmath7 selection enhances the measured @xmath20 as well as @xmath0 .
it could be originating from a larger initial eccentricity , although there should be a contribution from the selected flow itself because the radii modulations also depend on the anisotropy in the momentum space @xcite .
( left and center ) azimuthal angle dependence of @xmath26 and @xmath27 relative to @xmath19 .
( right ) 2@xmath28-order azimuthal oscillation on @xmath29 and @xmath30 . in both panels ,
results with and without higher @xmath7 selection are shown . ]
to study the twisted source in the final state , we used the data of pb+pb 2.76 tev collisions simulated using ampt model ( v2.25 with string melting ) , where the impact parameter was fixed to @xmath31 fm . for the hbt study ,
the interference effect between two identical particles , @xmath32 , was calculated and weighted to the relative pair momentum distributions .
then the correlation functions were reconstructed by taking a ratio of the distributions with and without the weight .
also , all charged pions were allowed to make a pair with each other including @xmath33 to increase the statistics ( the consistency between results for positive and negative pairs was checked ) .
the event plane was determined using particles in @xmath34 , where particles were divided into two sub - groups .
a set of forward and backward event planes ( @xmath35 ) were used for the event cut which requires finite difference between @xmath36 and @xmath37 as a event twist selection , whereas the other set of events was used for a reference angle of azimuthal hbt measurement .
figure [ fig3](left ) shows @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath38 as a function of azimuthal pair angle relative to the @xmath37 , @xmath39 , for four @xmath40 regions , where @xmath41 was required .
the oscillations of three hbt radii measured in positive @xmath40 regions are shifted to negative direction , which is the direction of @xmath36 in the current event cut .
this phase shift can be understood to be a possible twist effect in the final source distribution .
azimuthal angle dependence of @xmath26 , @xmath27 , and @xmath42 relative to the backward @xmath19 with the event cut of @xmath41 , where the dashed lines show @xmath43.,scaledwidth=99.0% ] these oscillations were fitted with the following functions : @xmath44 to extract the magnitude of the phase shift , which is taken into account with @xmath45 .
the phase shift parameter @xmath45 obtained from the results with respect to @xmath36 and @xmath37 is plotted as a function of @xmath40 in fig .
the @xmath45 increases with going from backward to forward angle in all cases .
the variation of @xmath45 in the @xmath40 dependence is comparable to the difference between results relative to @xmath36 and @xmath37 at the same @xmath40 .
these results indicate that the source in the final state is also twisted due to longitudinal fluctuations in the initial state , as well as the twisted event plane and flow as discussed in ref
. @xcite .
phase shift parameters @xmath45 obtained from the @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath46 as a function of @xmath40 .
results measured with respect to forward and backward event planes ( @xmath36 , @xmath37 ) are shown , with event cut of @xmath41.,scaledwidth=99.0% ]
we presented the results of hbt measurements using event shape engineering for collisions recorded with the phenix experiment .
we found that the higher @xmath7 selection enhances the measured final source eccentricity as well as @xmath0 .
although the model comparison is needed to disentangle both spatial and dynamical effects on the hbt radii , this study clarifies the relation between initial and final eccentricity and constrains better the system dynamics .
we have also studied the event twist effect using the ampt model . when selecting events with finite difference between forward and backward event plane angles , the oscillations of hbt radii are shifted in the phase and the phase shift increases with @xmath40 .
the results indicate a possible twisted source in the final state preserving the initial twist due to the longitudinal fluctuations . this effect could be measured in experiments at rhic and the lhc
. both techniques could be useful to probe and control initial fluctuations in transverse plane and longitudinal directions , as well as to study the response of the system to the space - time evolution .
9 a. adare _ et al . _
( phenix collaboration ) , phys .
rev . lett . * 107 * , 252301 ( 2011 ) . c. gale , s. jeon , b. schenke , p. tribedy , and r. venugopalan , phys .
lett . * 100 * , 012302 ( 2013 ) .
et al . _ ( atlas collaboration ) , jhep * 11 * ( 2013 ) 183 . j. schukraft , a. timmins , and s. a. voloshin , phys .
b * 719 * , 394 ( 2013 ) .
p. boek , w. broniowski , and j. moreira , phys .
c * 83 * , 034911 ( 2011 ) .
f. retire and m. a. lisa , phys .
c * 70 * , 044907 ( 2004 ) . c. j. plumberg , c. shen , and u. heinz , phys .
c * 88 * , 044914 ( 2013 ) .
j. jia and p. huo , phys .
c * 90 * , 034915 ( 2014 ) .
j. jia and p. huo , phys .
c * 90 * , 034905 ( 2014 ) .
s. pratt , phys .
d * 33 * , 72 ( 1986 ) .
g. bertsch , m. gong , and m. tohyama , phys .
c * 37 * , 1896 ( 1988 ) . | higher - order flow coefficients properties quark - gluon plasma viscosity entropy density in heavy ion collision @xmath0 caused by almond shape nuclear overlap region higher - order flow odd components from initial spatial fluctuations of participant nucleons atlas experiment results event - by - event @xmath1 values show large variations fixed centrality bin due to initial fluctuations event shape engineering suggested study response initial state to system evolution connect initial final states present results on hbt measurements using charged pions event shape engineering technique for au+au collisions at @xmath5=200 gev phenix experiment event shape engineering focuses on fluctuations transverse plane fluctuations longitudinal direction could cause twisted source number of participants participant eccentricities planes different different event plane angles initial twist may survive as twisted flow in final state examine possibility of spatially twisted source in final state using hbt interferometry in ampt model event shape selection magnitude of @xmath6-order flow vectors measured by reaction plane detector@xmath7 defined as @xmath9 multiplicity @xmath13 rxn shows @xmath7 distributions two centrality bins higher 20% lower 30% events filled tested effect @xmath7 selection on charged hadron @xmath0 measured at mid - rapidity systematic uncertainty from event planes included @xmath7 selection enhances decreases strength @xmath0 @xmath7 distributions measured with rxn in 200 gev collisions 20%(30% higher(lower @xmath7 events charged hadron @xmath0 function of @xmath15 with without event shape selection applied technique to hbt measurement using charged pion pairs identified by electromagnetic calorimeter @xmath14 pair selection cuts applied remove mis - reconstructed tracks detector inefficiency pion pairs analyzed with out - side - long parameterization @xcite in longitudinally co - moving system effect event plane resolution corrected with without @xmath7 selection extracted pion hbt radii @xmath16 function of azimuthal pair angle @xmath18 relative to second event plane @xmath19 higher @xmath7 selection increases oscillation strengthoscillations hbt radii sensitive to final source eccentricity freeze - out @xmath20 blast - wave studies suggest quantity @xmath21 good probe @xmath20 limit @xmath22 @xmath23 mean pair transverse momentum oscillation amplitudes @xmath24 @xmath25 final eccentricity number participants glauber model fig higher @xmath7 selection enhances @xmath20 @xmath0 from larger initial eccentricity flow radii modulations depend on anisotropy momentum space azimuthal angle dependence @xmath26 @xmath27 relative to @xmath19 2@xmath28-order azimuthal oscillation on @xmath29 @xmath30 results with without higher @xmath7 selection shown study twisted source final state used data 2.76 tev collisions ampt model impact parameter fixed to @xmath31 fm interference effect between two identical particles @xmath32 calculated weighted to relative pair momentum distributions correlation functions reconstructed ratio distributions with without weight all charged pions allowed pair including @xmath33 increase statistics event plane determined using particles in @xmath34 divided two sub - groupsforward backward event planes @xmath35 used for event cut difference between @xmath36 @xmath37 event twist selection other for reference angle azimuthal hbt measurement figure shows @xmath24 function of azimuthal pair angle relative to @xmath37 @xmath40 regions @xmath41 required oscillations of three hbt radii in positive @xmath40 regions shifted to negative direction @xmath36 current event cut phase shift possible twist effect in final source distribution azimuthal angle dependence of @xmath26 backward @xmath19 event cut @xmath41 dashed lines show @xmath43 oscillations fitted with functions @xmath44 magnitude phase shift @xmath45 phase shift parameter @xmath45 from results @xmath36 function of @xmath40 increases with backward to forward angle variation of @xmath45 in @xmath40 dependence comparable to difference results @xmath36 @xmath37 indicate source final state twisted due to longitudinal fluctuations initial state twisted event plane flow phase shift parameters @xmath45 from @xmath24 @xmath46 function of @xmath40results measured forward backward event planes @xmath36 shown event cut @xmath41,scaledwidth=99.0% presented results hbt measurements event shape engineering collisions phenix experiment higher @xmath7 selection enhances final source eccentricity @xmath0 model comparison needed spatial dynamical effects hbt radii study clarifies relation initial final eccentricity constrains system dynamics studied event twist effect ampt model selecting events finite difference forward backward event plane angles oscillations hbt radii shifted phase increases @xmath40 results indicate possible twisted source final state preserving initial twist longitudinal fluctuations effect measured experiments rhic lhc techniques useful probe control initial fluctuations transverse longitudinal directions study response system space - time evolution adare phenix collaboration phys . rev 107 252301 ( 2011 ) gale jeon schenke tribedy venugopalan 100 012302 ( 2013 ) atlas collaboration 11 2013 ) 183 schukraft timmins voloshin phys 719 394 ( 2013 ) boek broniowski moreira phys 83 034911 ( 2011 )retire lisa phys c 70 044907 ( 2004 ) plumberg shen heinz phys c 88 044914 ( 2013 ) j jia p. huo phys 90 034915 ( 2014 ) 90 034905 2014 ) pratt phys . d 33 72 ( 1986 ) bertsch m. gong tohyama . c 37 1896 ( 1988 ) | 0.350658 | 2,378 | 1,200 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,401 | comparative analysis of different types of initial mass spectra of primordial black holes ( pbhs ) is carried out .
it is assumed that primordial density fluctuations have power law spectrum and the spectral index is constant throughout all scales .
it is shown that densities of background radiations ( @xmath0 , @xmath1 ) from pbh evaporations strongly depend on the type of gravitational collapse and on the way of taking into account the spread of horizon masses at which pbhs can form . constraints on spectral index values based on pbh evaporation process and on atmospheric and solar neutrino data are obtained . | the initial mass function of primordial black holes ( or , it is better to say , the initial mass spectrum ) is determined , first of all , by the peculiarities of a gravitational collapse near the threshold of a black hole formation . according to analytic calculations of seventies @xcite
a critical size of the density contrast needed for the pbh formation , @xmath2 , is about @xmath3 . besides
, it was argued that all pbhs have mass roughly equal to the horizon mass at a moment of the formation , independently of the perturbation size .
however , it was shown recently that near the threshold of black hole formation the gravitational collapse behaves as a critical phenomenon @xcite . in this case
the initial mass function will be quite different from the analogous function in the analytic calculations @xcite .
the main feature is that the pbh mass formed depends on the size of the fluctuation @xcite , @xmath4 in this formula @xmath5 is the horizon mass at the time the fluctuation enters the horizon ; @xmath2 , @xmath6 , @xmath1 are parameters of a concrete model of the critical collapse @xcite
. it is seen from eq.([1 ] ) that pbh mass may be arbitrarily small independently of the value of @xmath5 . besides , the value of the critical overdensity , @xmath2 , in such models is typically @xmath7 , i.e. , about a factor of 2 larger than the value found analytically @xcite .
the second important ingredient of a pbh initial mass function calculation is a taking into account the spread of horizon masses at which pbhs are formed .
this problem exists independently of a nature of gravitational collapse .
it is assumed very often that the majority of the black hole formation occurs at the shortest possible scale . in particular , the authors of ref.@xcite determined the pbh initial mass function under the assumption that all pbhs form at the same horizon mass .
the accuracy of such approximation was studied in the work @xcite using the excursion set formalism , and it was found that it is good enough , at least in the case of power - law density perturbation spectra with the spectral index close to @xmath8 ( i.e. , slightly `` blue '' spectra , with the value of @xmath9 satisfying observational constraints ) .
recently , in the works of kim @xcite and present authors @xcite the expression for the pbh mass spectrum ( for the critical collapse case ) was obtained which takes into account the accumulation of pbhs formed at all epochs after the beginning of the ordinary radiation dominated era .
the derivation is based on the press- schechter formalism @xcite . resulting formula for the pbh mass spectrum , taking into account the spread of horizon masses , depends on the horizon crossing amplitude @xmath10 which is a function of horizon mass @xmath5 . in the present paper
we assume a power law of primordial density perturbations for all scales , and in this case one has ( @xmath11 ) @xmath12 @xmath13 in these formulas @xmath14 is the non - smoothing horizon crossing amplitude ( which is time - independent ) , @xmath15 is the present horizon mass , @xmath16 is the horizon mass at the moment of matter - radiation equality , @xmath17 is the numerical coefficient arising as a result of the smoothing procedure ( the top - hat form of the window - function was used in all numerical calculations ) .
the amplitude is normalized on cobe data ( see @xcite for detailes and references ) .
the expression for the pbh mass spectrum is @xcite @xmath18 @xmath19 here , @xmath20 amd @xmath21 are the background density and the horizon mass at @xmath22 ( @xmath22 is the moment of a beginning of growth of the density fluctuations ) . the value of pbh mass @xmath23 is connected with @xmath5 by the relation ( [ 1 ] ) . the upper limit of integration in eq.([4 ] )
is determined by the expression @xmath24.\ ] ] note , that in ref.@xcite the upper limit of integration in the expression for @xmath25 was erroneously put equal to 1 .
all numerical calculations were carried out with the following values of parameters @xcite : @xmath26 the known formula @xcite for the pbh mass spectrum in the standard collapse case can be obtained from eq.([4 ] ) by using the substitutions @xcite @xmath27 and the approximate relation @xmath28 substituting eqs.([6b ] ) and ( [ 6c ] ) in eq.([4 ] ) one obtains @xmath29 in this case the relation between @xmath23 and @xmath30 is independent on @xmath31 : @xmath32 we carried out in this work the calculations of the neutrino background spectra from pbh evaporations using the mass spectrum given by eq.([4 ] ) and , in parallel , the mass spectrum from ref.@xcite , @xmath33 ^ 2}{2\sigma_h^2}}.\ ] ] in this expression the amplitude @xmath10 is determined by the same formula ( [ 2 ] ) , as above , but with the constant value of @xmath5 , @xmath34 , in accordance with the assumption of authors of ref.@xcite that all pbhs form at the smallest scale .
our approach has two free parameters : the spectral index @xmath9 , giving the perturbation amplitude ( normalized on cobe data on large scales ) and @xmath22 , the moment of time just after reheating , from which the process of pbhs formation started .
the value of @xmath22 is connected with a value of the reheating temperature , @xmath35 ( @xmath36 is the number of degrees of freedom in the early universe ) . typical results of pbh mass spectrum calculations are shown on fig.1 .
we use , for convenience , the following abbreviations : kl , nj and bk signify , correspondingly , the pbh mass spectra calculated by formulae of kim and lee @xcite ( eq.([6d ] ) ) , niemeyer and jedamzik @xcite ( eq.([6 ] ) ) and bugaev and konishchev @xcite ( eq.([4 ] ) ) .
one can see from fig.1 that at large values of the spectral index there is a clear difference in a behavior of two mass spectra , nj and bk , based both on a picture of the critical collapse : bk spectrum is less steep at @xmath37 . of course , this difference is not so spectacular in cases when the spectral index @xmath9 is more close to 1 ( it is proved by another method in ref.@xcite ) .
the common feature of nj and bk spectra is the maximum at @xmath38 . besides
, both spectra have same slope in the region @xmath39 .
evolution of a pbh mass spectrum due to the evaporation leads to the approximate expression for this spectrum at any moment of time : @xmath40 where @xmath41 accounts for the degrees of freedom of evaporated particles and , strictly speaking , is a function of a running value of the pbh mass @xmath42 . in all our numerical calculations we use the approximation @xmath43 where @xmath44 is the value of @xmath23 in the initial mass spectrum corresponding to the maximum of this spectrum .
special study shows that errors connected with such approximation are rather small .
the expression for the spectrum of the background radiation is @xcite @xmath45 \cdot f(e\cdot ( 1+z),m)e^{-\tau(e , z)}\nonumber\\ \\ \equiv \int f(e , z)d \log_{10 } ( z+1).\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this formula @xmath46 is a total instantaneous spectrum of the background radiation ( neutrinos or photons ) from a black hole evaporation .
it includes the pure hawking term and contributions from fragmentations of evaporated quarks and from decays of pions and muons ( see @xcite for details ) .
the exponential factor in eq.([10 ] ) takes into account an absorption of the radiation during its propagation in space .
the processes of the neutrino absorption are considered , in a given context , in ref.@xcite . in last line of eq.([10 ] ) we changed the variable @xmath47 on @xmath48 using , for simplicity , the flat model with @xmath49 for which @xmath50 several examples of @xmath48-distributions ( the integrands of the integral over @xmath48 in eq.([10 ] ) ) are shown on fig.2 . again one can see the rather strong difference of two cases : the existence of a tail of heavy masses in bk spectrum leads to a relative enhancement of low @xmath48-contributions .
the effect becomes more distinct with a rise of the reheating temperature .
the sharp cut - off of all @xmath48-distributions near @xmath51 is entirely due to the neutrino absorption @xcite .
the shrinkage of @xmath48-distributions at large @xmath52 in nj - case is due to the absence of large masses in the spectrum ( pbhs of small masses evaporated earlier , and their radiation today is more redshifted ) .
some results of calculations of the neutrino background spectra are shown on figs.3 - 5 .
the functional form of these spectra is qualitatively the same as in the standard collapse case @xcite : @xmath53 law at large neutrino energies and a flat part at low energies with the crossover energy depending on @xmath52 .
the only new feature is the sharp steepening of the spectra at high values of @xmath52 in nj case ( fig.4 ) connected with the corresponding shrinkage of the @xmath48-range .
fig.5 shows the sensitivity of background neutrino intensities to a chosen value of the spectral index @xmath9 , at a fixed @xmath52 .
one can see from this figure that the neutrino background flux from pbh evaporations is comparable with the atmospheric neutrino flux at @xmath54 if @xmath55 ( at @xmath56 ) .
such large values of the spectral index are , probably , excluded by the recent large - scale experiments .
next figure shows the constraints on the spectral index following from data of neutrino experiments , as a function of the reheating temperature . as in our previous work , we used for a description of these constraints the data of the kamiokande atmospheric neutrino experiment @xcite and the experiment on a search of an antineutrino flux from the sun @xcite ( see @xcite for details ) . for completeness
, we show on the same figure the constraints following from extragalactic diffuse gamma ray data ; part of them ( nj case ) is in qualitative agreement with the results of ref.@xcite .
it is seen that the constraints are much more weak in nj case ( at @xmath57 ) .
it is again the result of an absence of the tail of large masses in nj spectrum , leading to a shrinkage of the @xmath48-distriburions and to a steepening of the background neutrino spectra .
\1 . the initial concentration of pbh s is larger in the case of the standard picture of the gravitational collapse ( as compared with the critical collapse case ) .
it is due to relatively small value of the critical overdensity ( @xmath58 ) . in the region near the maximum of pbh
mass spectra the ratio of intensities is given by the approximate relation @xmath59 correspondingly , densities of the neutrino and gamma backgrounds produced by pbh s evaporations are smaller and spectral index constraints are weaker in the critical collapse case .
the summation over all epochs of pbh s production ( i.e. , the transition from nj to bk case ) leads to an appearing of the tail of large pbh masses in the pbh mass spectrum .
this tail is especially sufficient if the spectral index @xmath9 is relatively large .
spectral index constraints following from the comparison of neutrino background predictions with existing data of neutrino experiments are rather weak if the purely power law of primordial density fluctuations is assumed for all scales ( and , correspondingly , the normalization on cobe data is used ) .
however , it does not mean that neutrino background intensities from pbh s evaporations can not be noticeable . if , for example , the spectrum of primordial density fluctuations is a combination of two simple power law spectra @xcite , i.e. , @xmath61 then the small value of @xmath62 ( @xmath63 ) which follows , in particular , from cobe data , does not contradict with the possibility that @xmath64 is large and , correspondingly , @xmath10 at small scales is also large . if @xmath65 and @xmath66 are known from somewhere , one can easily obtain from the neutrino data the constraints on the small scale spectral index @xmath67 , in the same manner as it is done above for the all scale spectral index @xmath9 .
several cosmological models of such kind , which predict a large density fluctuation amplitude just on small scales ( while the amplitude on large scales is constrained by the small cmbr anisotropy ) appeared recently ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
b. j. carr and s. w. hawking , mon . not .
* 168 * , 399 ( 1974 ) .
b. j. carr , astrophys .
j. * 201 * , 1 ( 1975 ) .
j. c. niemeyer and k. jedamzik , phys .
lett . * 80 * 5481 ( 1998 ) .
j. c. niemeyer and k. jedamzik , phys .
d * 59 * 124013 ( 1999 ) .
a. m. green and a. r. liddle , phys .
d * 60 * , 063509 ( 1999 ) .
h. i. kim , phys .
d * 62 * 063504 ( 2000 ) .
e. v. bugaev and k. v. konishchev , _ astro - ph/_0005295 .
e. v. bugaev and k. v. konishchev , _ astro - ph/_0103265 . w. h. press and p. schechter , astrophys .
j. * 187 * , 425 ( 1974 ) .
h. i. kim and c. h. lee , phys .
d * 54 * , 6001 ( 1996 ) .
e. v. bugaev and v. a. naumov , phys .
b * 232 * , 391 ( 1989 ) .
k. s. hirata _
et al . _ ,
b * 280 * , 146 ( 1992 ) .
m. aglietta _
et al . _ , pisma zh .
. fiz . * 63 * , 753 ( 1996 ) .
g. d. kribs , a. k. leibovich , and i. z. rothstein , phys . rev . * 60 * , 103510 ( 1999 ) .
l. randall , m. soljacic , and a. h. guth , nucl .
b * 472 * , 377 ( 1996 ) .
j. garcia - bellido , a. d. linde , and d. wands , phys .
d * 54 * , 6040 ( 1996 ) . | initial mass function of primordial black holes determined by gravitational collapse near threshold formation to analytic calculations critical size of density contrast for pbh formation is about @xmath3 all pbhs have mass equal to horizon mass at formation independently of perturbation size near threshold black hole formation gravitational collapse critical initial mass function different from pbh mass depends on size of fluctuation @xmath5 is horizon mass fluctuation @xmath2 @xmath6 @xmath1 are parameters of model of critical collapse pbh mass may be arbitrarily small independently of value of @xmath5 value of critical overdensity @xmath2 is typically @xmath7 about factor of 2 larger than value found analytically @xcite second important ingredient of pbh initial mass function calculation is spread of horizon masses at pbhs are formed problem exists independently of gravitational collapse majority of black hole formation occurs at shortest scale authors of ref.@xcite determined pbh initial mass function under all pbhs form at same horizon massaccuracy approximation studied in work @xcite excursion set formalism good enough power - law density perturbation spectra spectral index close to @xmath8 blue spectra value @xmath9 satisfying observational constraints works kim @xcite present authors expression pbh mass spectrum critical collapse case obtained accumulation of pbhs epochs after ordinary radiation era derivation based on press- schechter formalism @xcite formula pbh mass spectrum depends on horizon crossing amplitude @xmath10 function of horizon mass @xmath5 assume power law of primordial density perturbations for all scales @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 non - smoothing horizon crossing amplitude time - independent present horizon mass horizon mass moment matter - radiation equality numerical coefficient smoothing procedure amplitude normalized on cobe data see @xcite expression for pbh mass spectrum is @xcite @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 background density horizon mass at @xmath22 beginning growth density fluctuations value pbh mass @xmath23 connected with @xmath5 by relation ( [ 1 ] )upper limit integration in eq.([4 ] ) determined by expression @xmath24. ref.@xcite upper limit @xmath25 erroneously equal to 1 numerical calculations with values parameters @xcite : @xmath26 formula for pbh mass spectrum standard collapse case obtained from eq.([4 ] ) substitutions @xcite @xmath27 approximate relation @xmath28 substituting eqs.([6b and 6c[4 obtains @xmath29 relation between @xmath23 and @xmath30 independent on @xmath31 : @xmath32 calculations neutrino background spectra from pbh evaporations using mass spectrum eq.([4 ] ) from ref.@xcite @xmath33 amplitude @xmath10 determined by same formula constant value of @xmath5 , @xmath34 all pbhs form at smallest scale approach has two free parameters spectral index @xmath9 perturbation amplitude @xmath22 moment after reheating formation value @xmath22 connected with reheating temperature @xmath35 results pbh mass spectrum calculations shown on fig.1 use abbreviations : kl nj bk signify pbh mass spectra calculated by formulae kim lee niemeyer jedamzik bugaev konishchev fig.1 at large values spectral index difference in behavior of mass spectra nj and bk based on picture critical collapse : bk spectrum less steep at @xmath37 difference not spectacular spectral index @xmath9 close to 1 proved common feature of nj bk spectra maximum at @xmath38 both spectra have same slope in region @xmath39 evolution of pbh mass spectrum due to evaporation leads to approximate expression : @xmath40 @xmath41 accounts for degrees freedom of evaporated particles function of running value pbh mass @xmath42 numerical calculations use approximation @xmath43 @xmath44 is value of @xmath23 initial mass spectrum maximum errors smallexpression spectrum background radiation is @xcite @xmath45 \cdot f(e ( 1+z),m)e^{-\tau(e , z)}\nonumber\\\equiv \int f(e , z)d \log_{10 } ( z+1).\nonumber\end{aligned} formula @xmath46 is total spectrum background radiation from black hole evaporation includes hawking term contributions fragmentations evaporated quarks decays pions muons see @xcite exponential factor in eq.([10 ] ) absorption radiation during propagation processes neutrino absorption considered in ref.@xcite changed variable @xmath47 on @xmath48 using flat model with @xmath49 @xmath50 examples @xmath48-distributions shown on fig.2 difference tail heavy masses leads enhancement low @xmath48-contributions effect distinct reheating temperature cut - off @xmath48-distributions near @xmath51 due to neutrino absorption shrinkage @xmath48-distributions at @xmath52 due absence large masses small masses evaporated radiation redshifted results calculations neutrino background spectra shown on figs.5 functional form spectra same as standard collapse case @xcite @xmath53 law at large energies flat part at low energies crossover energy on @xmath52 new feature steepening spectra at high values @xmath52 in nj case fig.4 shrinkage @xmath48-range fig.5 shows sensitivity background neutrino intensities to spectral index @xmath9 fixed @xmath52 neutrino background flux from pbh evaporations comparable with atmospheric neutrino flux at @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 large values spectral index excluded by recent large - scale experiments figure shows constraints spectral index from data neutrino experiments function reheating temperature used data kamiokande atmospheric neutrino experiment experiment antineutrino flux from sun constraints from extragalactic diffuse gamma ray data nj case agreement with results ref.@xcite constraints more weak in nj case at @xmath57 ) result absence tail large masses in nj spectrum shrinkage @xmath48-distriburions steepening background neutrino spectra initial concentration of pbh s larger in standard picture gravitational collapse critical collapsedue to small value critical overdensity @xmath58 ) region near maximum pbh mass spectra ratio intensities by relation @xmath59 densities neutrino gamma backgrounds pbh evaporations smaller spectral index constraints weaker in critical collapse case summation over epochs pbh production transition from nj to bk leads to tail large pbh masses in mass spectrum sufficient if spectral index @xmath9 large spectral index constraints comparison neutrino background predictions with data weak if power law primordial density fluctuations assumed for all scales normalization on cobe data used neutrino background intensities from pbh evaporations noticeable spectrum primordial density fluctuations combination of two power law spectra @xmath61 small value of @xmath62 @xmath63 contradict @xmath64 large @xmath10 at small scales large if @xmath65 and @xmath66 known obtain from neutrino data constraints on small scale spectral index @xmath67 spectral index @xmath9 cosmological models predict large density fluctuation amplitude on small scales large constrained by small cmbr anisotropy appearedb. j. carr w hawking 168 399 ( 1974 ) carr astrophys 201 ( 1975 ) c. niemeyer k. jedamzik phys 80 5481 ( 1998 ) jedamzik phys 59 124013 ( 1999 ) a. m. green a r. liddle phys 60 063509 ( 1999 ) h i. kim 62 * 063504 ( 2000 ) bugaev k v konishchev astro - ph/_0005295_0103265 h. press p schechter astrophys 187 425 ( 1974 ) h. i. kim c. h. lee 54 6001 ( 1996 ) v bugaev v a. naumov phys 232 391 ( 1989 ) hirata 280 146 ( 1992 ) aglietta 63 753 ( 1996 ). d. kribs k. leibovich i z. rothstein phys . 60 * 103510 ( 1999 ) l. randall. soljacic a. h. guth nucl 472 377 ( 1996 ) j. garcia - bellidolinde d. wands phys. 54 6040 1996 | 0.565619 | 3,382 | 1,760 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,432 | the recently announced super - kamiokande data on atmospheric neutrino oscillation seems to require a maximal mixing between the @xmath0 and @xmath1 within the conventional three neutrino picture .
it is then tempting to suggest as has been done in literature , that the solar neutrino deficit be also understood as resulting from a maximal mixing between @xmath2 and @xmath0 . in this letter
, we propose a left - right symmetric extension of the standard model where permutation symmetry leads to one of the maximal mixing patterns in a technically natural manner .
the double seesaw mechanism gives small majorana masses for neutrinos needed to understand the atmospheric as well as the solar neutrino puzzles .
umd - pp-98 - 132 | the announcement by the super - kamiokande collaboration@xcite of evidence for neutrino oscillation ( and hence nonzero neutrino mass ) in their atmospheric neutrino data is a major milestone in the search for new physics beyond the standard model .
an outstanding feature of these oscillations is the maximal mixing between the @xmath0 and @xmath1 ( @xmath3 ) in sharp contrast with the mixing pattern in the quark sector . also the inferred @xmath4 ev@xmath5 is lower than most `` see - saw motivated '' extrapolations from @xmath6 values in the small or large angle msw solutions to the solar neutrino problem@xcite : @xmath7ev@xmath5 with @xmath8 and @xmath9 ev@xmath5 with @xmath10 .
the solar neutrino problem provided the first indication for neutrino oscillation and this evidence keeps building up .
it can also be resolved by the maximal @xmath11 vacuum oscillation with fine tuned small mass difference @xmath12 ev@xmath5 .
maximal mixing with larger @xmath13 values yield an energy independent suppression of all solar neutrinos ( except when it is in the large angle msw range mentioned above ) . while this does not resolve the solar neutrino problem at present , it does considerably ameliorate it .
all the above suggests considering maximal ( @xmath11 ) mixing alongside maximal ( @xmath14 ) mixing@xcite .
three specific `` bimaximal mixing '' patterns@xcite having particularly simple forms are : _ case ( a)@xcite : _ @xmath15 where @xmath16 ; we will call this the symmetric mixing pattern .
_ case ( b)@xcite : _
@xmath17 this has been called in the literature as bimaximal mixing@xcite . _ case ( c)@xcite : _ @xmath18
we call this democratic mixing . in the above equations ,
we have defined @xmath19 as follows : @xmath20 with @xmath21 being the weak eigenstates and @xmath22 , the mass eigenstates .
our goal is to explore possible extensions of the standard model that may provide a theoretical understanding of the maximal mixing patterns .
attempts to understand the pattern ( a ) , made in our previous paper@xcite were largely unsuccessful . also the chooz upper bound@xcite on @xmath23 oscillation with @xmath24 ev@xmath5 , tends together with super - kamiokande data , to disfavor this possibility .
there has been several recent attempts to derive the second pattern ( b)@xcite . here we will show by using an extension of the standard model , that it is possible to generate the pattern ( c ) in a consistent and natural way .
our motivation is quite clear : if nature presents us with such a neutrino mixing pattern , we must seek an extension of the standard model that can naturally lead to it .
hopefully a theory that naturally provides this pattern will have other testable predictions . in ref.@xcite , permutation symmetry was imposed on the charged lepton mass matrix and not on the neutrino mass matrices in order to motivate the pattern ( c ) .
no underlying theoretical justification was discussed for such a hypothesis . in the framework of gauge theories ,
such an assumption is hard to understand apriori since the charged leptons and the neutrinos are members of the same isodoublet of the standard model gauge group @xmath25 and therefore the permutation symmetry could lead to a similar mass matrix for both the charged lepton sector as well as the neutrino sector . if that happens , the neutrino mixing matrix which is given by @xmath26 could substantially differ from ( c ) .
it is therefore important to investigate whether the above mixing pattern arises in a complete theory .
also the putative mass pattern @xmath27 should be provided by the model rather than arbitrarily fixed .
it is considerations such as these which motivate us to add this brief note to the exploding literature on neutrino models .
we find that by combining the permutation symmetry @xmath28 with a @xmath29 symmetry in the left - right symmetric extension of the standard model , we can obtain the maximal mixing pattern ( c ) in a technically natural manner ( i.e. without setting any parameters to zero by hand ) . in the limit of exact permutation symmetry , all the neutrinos are degenerate as are the elctron and the muon . as a result
, the mixing angles can be rotated away . however , once one admits permutation breaking terms to accomodate the electron muon mass difference , the neutrino degeneracy is removed and the democratic form ( pattern c ) of the maximal mixing pattern remains .
in fact , the masses of @xmath2 and @xmath0 get related to the elctron and muon masses arising completely from radiative corrections . to avoid arbitrary deviations from the maximal pattern , we assume that the permutation symmetry ( but not the @xmath29 ) is softly broken .
this adds only small , finite , corrections to the mixing pattern and one obtains a complete and realistic gauge theoretic derivation of the maximal mixing pattern c.
we consider a left - right symmetric extension of the standard model with the usual fermionic field content@xcite .
we omit the discussion of the quark sector for now . denoting the leptons by @xmath30 ,
the @xmath31 transform as the @xmath32 doublets respectively under the left - right gauge group @xmath33 .
the subscript @xmath34 stands for the generations .
we choose the following set of higgs bosons to achieve the symmetry breaking : three sets of left and right doublets dnoted by @xmath35 ( @xmath36 ) ; the @xmath37 vev will break the @xmath38 gauge symmetry down to the standard model @xmath39 group .
we choose three bidoublets @xmath40 to break the electroweak @xmath41 symmetry and give mass to the quarks and charged leptons as well as the dirac mass for the neutrinos . in order to implement the double seesaw@xcite mechanism for neutrino masses ,
we introduce three gauge singlet fermion fields , @xmath42 . in order to get the desired pattern for lepton masses , we demand the theory to respect the symmetry @xmath43 for all dimension four terms .
we assume that all interactions of dimension four are invariant under permutation of the three indices @xmath36 for the fields that carry the subscript @xmath34@xcite .
this symmetry will be softly broken by terms of dimension @xmath44 .
we assume that under left - right symmetry @xmath45 and @xmath46 the transformation of the various fields under symmetry @xmath47 is given in table i. the quark fields are assumed to be singlets under the above groups .
the yukawa couplings invariant under the above symmetries are : @xmath48 it is then clear that after the @xmath40 acquire vev s , they will give dirac mass to the charged leptons and the neutrinos . to get the desired pattern of charged lepton masses and the dirac mass for the neutrinos , we choose the vev pattern for the @xmath49 s as follows : @xmath50 . on the other hand , for the fields @xmath51 , we choose @xmath52 . due to left - right symmetry
, one can assure that @xmath53 .
it is crucial that the the vev pattern for @xmath51 is stable since this is what distinguishes the neutrino sector from the charged lepton sector and leads to the maximal mixing pattern ( c ) of democratic type for the neutrinos .
it is important for this that there be no tadpole terms involving the @xmath54 components of the @xmath51 fields .
this is verified by making the observation that all the @xmath55 have same @xmath56 quantum number ; as a result terms like @xmath57 which could generate the tadpoles are not present in the potential .
the above vev pattern has the consequence that all elements of the charged lepton mass matrix are nonzero whereas the dirac mass matrix for the neutrinos is diagonal . to see the resulting mixing matrix ,
let us write the charged lepton mass matrix : @xmath58 where @xmath59 and @xmath60 .
three eigen vectors of this mass matrix can be written as : @xmath61 where the particles in the above equation with superscript zero denote that they are the weak eigenstates prior to the diagonalization of the mass matrix .
note that this matrix is precisely the matrix in eq .
the corresponding eigenvalues are : @xmath62 it is then easy to see that if the majorana mass matrix for the neutrinos is diagonal , the consequent neutrino mixing matrix determined by the diagonalization of the charged lepton matrix above and is precisely of type ( c ) described above .
note however that the muon and the electron masses are equal .
in order for them to be much less than the @xmath63 mass as observed , we must have @xmath64 .
it is interesting to note that if instead of @xmath28 symmetry , one assumes @xmath65 then indeed one ends up with @xmath66 as has been noted already@xcite .
as alluded to before , we must have permutation symmetry breaking terms to split their masses . before proceeding to that discussion ,
let us turn to the neutrino sector to make sure that no mixing angles emerge in the neutrino sector that could vitiate the maximal pattern .
equation ( 3 ) and the @xmath67 vev pattern imply that the dirac mass matrix for the three neutrinos is diagonal with all @xmath68 given by @xmath69 . in order to understand the small neutrino masses
we must implement a seesaw mechanism .
it turns out that in this case the appropriate one for us is the double seesaw mechanism discussed in @xcite .
from the terms involving the gauge singlet fermions @xmath42 s in the lagrangian : @xmath70 the @xmath71 mass matrix comes out to be @xmath72 with @xmath73 providing the largest mass scale in the problem .
each of the entries in eq .
( 7 ) except the @xmath74 is a @xmath75 unit matrix . in the limit of exact permutation symmetry
, @xmath76 would also be a unit matrix .
the light neutrino eigenvalues are given by : @xmath77 it is important to emphasize that there is no mixing in the purely neutrino sector so that in the basis where the charged leptons are diagonal , we have the desired maximal mixing pattern .
this in our opinion is the big model building challenge that we have solved in this article .
clearly , if permutation symmetry had not been broken by the different @xmath42 masses , the mixing matrix would have been arbitrary .
to get a feeling for the scale of new physics @xmath78 , we note that @xmath79 gev . therefore ,
assuming @xmath80 , we get @xmath81 gev ; and for @xmath82 gev and @xmath83 , we get @xmath84 ev . if we choose @xmath85 gev and @xmath86 , we get @xmath87 ev , which is in the range required to solve the atmospheric neutrino puzzle . at this stage
it might appear that the muon- and electron - neutrino masses can be chosen at will by adjusting the @xmath88 .
but this is not so since the muon and electron masses which are tiny at the tree level ( if we choose @xmath66 ) must also arise out of the mass splitting among the @xmath42 s at the one loop level .
the radiative contributions to the muon and electron masses arise from the diagram of type shown in fig.1 and we can estimate this contribution to be : @xmath89 where @xmath90 is the typical heavy higgs boson mass that appears in the loop .
we have also used the fact the vevs of @xmath91 satisfy the relation @xmath92 .
= 8.5 cm = 8.5 cm choosing @xmath93 and @xmath94 , @xmath95 and @xmath96 , we estimate @xmath97 note that since we need to get the entire masses for the muon and the electron from the one loop correction , we must choose @xmath98 gev and @xmath99 gev .
this then implies that @xmath100 ev and @xmath101 ev .
we thus see that @xmath102 relevant for solving the solar neutrino problem is @xmath103 ev@xmath5 .
this is comfortably in the right range for solving the solar neutrino problem using the large angle msw solution .
let us now discuss the vev pattern assumed in the preceding analysis .
two points need to be discussed are ( i ) the specific vev pattern for the field @xmath51 that differentiates the neutrino dirac mass from the charged lepton mass matrix and ( ii ) the induced @xmath104 vev .
note that due to the nontrivial transformation of the @xmath105 field under the @xmath106 symmetry , the only allowed terms involving it in the potential are @xmath107 , @xmath108 , @xmath109 .
similar thing happens for @xmath110 .
note further that the @xmath56 symmetry forbids terms like @xmath111 .
the absence of terms of the form @xmath112 guarantees that once we choose the vev of the form @xmath113 , there are no tadpole like terms that can destabilize that vacuum . finally the fact that under left - right symmetry @xmath114 guarantees there is a discrete symmetry between these two fields leading to a stable minimum with @xmath53 .
turning now to the second point , note that the potential involving the @xmath115 fields has the form @xmath116 where sum over @xmath34 has been omitted for simplicity . minimizing this
we get that @xmath117 .
a few comments about the model are in order .
\(i ) it is worth pointing out that in presence of the permutation symmetry breaking terms in the singlet fermion sector , there will be small deviations from the equality of the @xmath118 s and consequently of the scalar doublet masses .
but these effects are small and they do not alter any of our conclusions .
\(ii ) the quark fields are assumed to be singlets under @xmath119 .
therefore , their masses arise from the @xmath120 couplings only and thus are not constrained by the patterns in the lepton sector .
\(iii ) the lightest of the singlet fermions @xmath121 which couples to electrons can be produced at lep energies but has a cross section of order @xmath122 which at the highest lep energies is about @xmath123 cm@xmath5 and is thus practically invisible .
in conclusion , we have succeeded in constructing a natural gauge model for the democratic maximal mixing for neutrinos suggested by the present neutrino data if lsnd results are not included .
the models also predicts a small mass difference between the @xmath2 and @xmath0 as needed for the large angle msw solution to the solar neutrino problem . to the best of our knowledge ,
this is the first time that a gauge model for understanding the democratic lepton mass matrix in an extension of the standard model has been constructed .
the model is essentially an electroweak scale model with low scale for the right handed @xmath125 s and uses the double seesaw mechanism to generate small neutrino masses .
some of the new fermions of the model are light in the sense of collider physics .
but their couplings to known particles are weak and thus there is no conflict with existing data . | announcement super - kamiokande collaboration of evidence for neutrino oscillation nonzero neutrino mass in atmospheric neutrino data major milestone new physics beyond standard model maximal mixing between @xmath0 @xmath1 with quark sector inferred @xmath4 ev@xmath5 lower than see - extrapolations from @xmath6 values in small angle msw solutions solar neutrino problem @xmath7ev@xmath5 @xmath8 @xmath10 solar neutrino problem first indication for neutrino oscillation evidence keeps building resolved by maximal @xmath11 vacuum oscillation with tuned small mass difference @xmath12@xmath5 maximal mixing with @xmath13 values energy independent suppression of all solar neutrinos except large angle msw range resolve solar neutrino problem suggests considering maximal @xmath11 ) mixing alongside maximal @xmath14 ) mixing three bimaximal mixing patterns @xmath15 @xmath16 symmetric mixing pattern @xmath17 bimaximal mixing democratic mixingdefined @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 weak eigenstates @xmath22 mass eigenstates goal explore extensions standard model theoretical understanding maximal mixing patterns attempts understand pattern ( a ) previous paper@xcite unsuccessful chooz upper bound@xcite @xmath23 oscillation with @xmath24@xmath5 super - kamiokande data possibility recent attempts to derive second pattern ( b)@xcite show extension standard model generate pattern ( c ) motivation clear if nature presents neutrino mixing pattern seek extension model theory provides pattern testable predictions.@xcite permutation symmetry imposed on charged lepton mass matrix not neutrino mass matrices motivate pattern ( c ) no theoretical justification discussed hypothesis gauge theories assumption hard to understand apriori charged leptons neutrinos same isodoublet standard model gauge group @xmath25 permutation symmetry could lead similar mass matrix charged lepton neutrino sector neutrino mixing matrix @xmath26 could differ from ( c ) important to investigate mixing pattern in complete theory putative mass pattern @xmath27 should provided by model fixedconsiderations motivate note literature neutrino models combining permutation symmetry @xmath28 @xmath29 symmetry - model maximal mixing pattern c without setting parameters zero limit permutation symmetry neutrinos degenerate elctron muon mixing angles rotated permutation breaking terms electron muon mass difference neutrino degeneracy removed democratic form pattern c mixing remains masses of @xmath2 @xmath0 related to elctron muon masses from radiative corrections avoid deviations assume permutation symmetry not @xmath29 softly broken adds small corrections mixing pattern obtains complete derivation maximal mixing pattern c consider left - right symmetric extension standard model fermionic field content@xcite omit discussion quark sector denoting leptons @xmath30 @xmath31 transform as @xmath32 doublets under left - right gauge group @xmath33 subscript @xmath34 stands for generations choose higgs bosons achieve symmetry breaking three sets left right doublets dnoted by @xmath35 @xmath36 ) @xmath37 vev @xmath38 gauge symmetry to standard model @xmath39 groupchoose three bidoublets @xmath40 break electroweak @xmath41 symmetry give mass quarks charged leptons dirac mass neutrinos double seesaw@xcite mechanism neutrino masses introduce three gauge singlet fermion fields @xmath42 pattern lepton theory respect symmetry @xmath43 dimension four terms interactions dimension four invariant permutation three indices @xmath36 fields subscript @xmath34@xcite symmetry broken terms dimension @xmath44 left - right symmetry @xmath45 @xmath46 transformation fields symmetry @xmath47 table i quark fields singlets groups yukawa couplings invariant symmetries @xmath48 @xmath40 vev s give dirac mass charged leptons neutrinos desired pattern charged lepton masses dirac mass neutrinos choose vev pattern @xmath49 s @xmath50 fields @xmath51 choose @xmath52 left - right symmetry @xmath53 crucial vev pattern @xmath51 stable distinguishes neutrino sector charged lepton sector leads maximal mixing pattern neutrinos no tadpole terms involving @xmath54 components @xmath51 fieldsverified by @xmath55 have same @xmath56 quantum number terms like @xmath57 tadpoles not present in potential vev pattern all elements charged lepton mass matrix nonzero dirac mass matrix for neutrinos diagonal mixing matrix write charged lepton mass matrix : @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 . three eigen vectors written as @xmath61 particles with zero weak eigenstates prior to diagonalization matrix matrix in eq . corresponding eigenvalues are : @xmath62 majorana mass matrix for neutrinos diagonal neutrino mixing matrix determined by diagonalization matrix type ( c ) described muon electron masses equal for less than @xmath63 mass must have @xmath64 @xmath28 symmetry assumes @xmath65 ends up with @xmath66 must permutation symmetry terms to split masses turn to neutrino sector no mixing angles vitiate maximal pattern equation ( 3 ) @xmath67 vev pattern imply dirac mass matrix for three neutrinos diagonal with all @xmath68 given by @xmath69 understand small neutrino masses implement seesaw mechanismappropriate double seesaw mechanism in @xcite gauge singlet fermions @xmath42 s lagrangian @xmath70 @xmath71 mass matrix @xmath72 @xmath73 largest mass scale entries in eq . ( 7 ) except @xmath74 @xmath75 unit matrix permutation symmetry @xmath76 unit matrix light neutrino eigenvalues by @xmath77 no mixing in purely neutrino sector charged leptons diagonal desired maximal mixing pattern big model building challenge solved if permutation symmetry broken by different @xmath42 masses mixing matrix arbitrary scale new physics @xmath78 @xmath79 gev assuming @xmath80 get @xmath81 gev @xmath82 gev @xmath83 @xmath84 ev @xmath85 gev @xmath86 get @xmath87 ev solve atmospheric neutrino puzzle muon- electron - neutrino masses chosen by adjusting @xmath88 not muon electron masses tiny tree level @xmath66 arise mass splitting among @xmath42 s loop level radiative contributions to muon electron masses arise from diagram of type fig.estimate contribution @xmath89 @xmath90 typical heavy higgs boson mass in loop vevs @xmath91 satisfy relation @xmath92 = 8.5 cm choosing @xmath93 @xmath94 estimate @xmath97 need entire masses muon electron from loop correction choose @xmath98 gev @xmath99 gev implies @xmath100 ev @xmath101 ev @xmath102 relevant solar neutrino problem @xmath103 ev@xmath5 right range solar neutrino problem large angle msw solution discuss vev pattern specific vev pattern field @xmath51 differentiates neutrino dirac mass charged lepton mass matrix induced @xmath104 vev nontrivial transformation @xmath105 field under @xmath106 symmetry allowed terms @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath109 similar @xmath110 @xmath56 symmetry forbids terms @xmath111 absence terms form @xmath112 guarantees vev @xmath113 no tadpole terms destabilize vacuum under left - right symmetry @xmath114 guarantees discrete symmetry between fields stable minimum with @xmath53second point potential @xmath115 fields has form @xmath116 sum over @xmath34 omitted for minimizing @xmath117 comments about model permutation symmetry breaking terms in singlet fermion sector small deviations from equality @xmath118 s scalar doublet masses effects small alter conclusions quark fields assumed singlets under @xmath119 masses arise from @xmath120 couplings not constrained by patterns lepton sector lightest singlet fermions @xmath121 couples to electrons produced at lep energies cross section of order @xmath122 highest lep energies about @xmath123 cm@xmath5 practically invisible natural gauge model for democratic maximal mixing for neutrinos present neutrino data results predicts small mass difference between @xmath2 and @xmath0 for large angle msw solution solar neutrino problem first time gauge model for understanding democratic lepton mass matrix standard model constructed model electroweak scale model low scale for @xmath125 s uses double seesaw mechanism small neutrino masses new fermions light couplings to known particles weak no conflict with existing data | 0.505348 | 3,375 | 1,771 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,440 | the rise and fall of online social networks has recently generated an enormous amount of interest among people , both inside and outside of academia .
gillette [ businessweek magazine , 2011 ] did a detailed analysis of myspace , which started losing its popularity since 2008 .
recently , cannarella and spechler [ arxiv , 2014 ] used a model of disease spread to explain this rise and fall of myspace . in this paper
, we give an alternative explanation for the same .
our explanation is based on the well - known barabasi - albert model of generating random scale - free networks using preferential attachment mechanism . | the last decade has seen the emergence of highly popular online social networks like myspace , orkut and facebook .
myspace was founded in 2003 and it gained its peak popularity in 2008 @xcite .
however , most of the users have started abandoning it since 2008 @xcite .
cannarella and spechler @xcite have modified the sir model of disease spread @xcite to explain this phenomenon . the disease spread model has also been used to study the arrival and departure dynamics of the users in social networks @xcite . in this paper , we give an alternative explanation of the rise and fall of myspace . to begin with
, we note that people join social networks due to the presence of their friends in these networks and leave them due to the inactivity of these friends @xcite .
it is also known that a large number of the social network friendships are not active or strong friendships between the users @xcite , where a _ strong friendship _ between a pair of social network friends is indicated by regular communication between them .
in fact , the well - known dunbar s number @xcite says that an individual can comfortably maintain a stable relationship with around 150 other people only .
it means that the strong friendships are limited in a social network , even though there is no bound on the number of friends one can have in most social networks . in order to identify the strong friendships between people in a social network , onella et .
al @xcite did an empirical study to establish that greater neighbourhood overlap between a pair of friends corresponds to stronger friendships between them .
the _ neighbourhood overlap _ between a pair of users @xmath0 and @xmath1 in a network is defined as the number of nodes who are neighbours of both @xmath0 and @xmath1 divided by the number of nodes who are neighbours of at least one of them . since
strong or active friendships are important for a user to remain in a social network @xcite , we study the change in the number of users who have at least a certain minimum number of strong friendships in an evolving social network created by the barabasi - albert random graph model @xcite , where we define a pair of users to be strong friends if their neighbourhood overlap is larger than a certain constant .
we also study the change in the size of the largest connected component in the strong friendship subgraph of the evolving barabasi - albert random graph .
this is motivated by the observation that the nodes in the core of a social network are more likely to survive than the nodes at the periphery @xcite .
we consider the largest connected component in the strong friendship subgraph of a social network to be its _ core _ that is important to retain most of its users .
our model is based on the well - known barabasi - albert model @xcite of social networks .
the barabasi - albert model is an algorithm to generate random scale - free networks based on preferential attachment and growth .
the preferential attachment is the property that a node with a higher degree is more likely to get connected to new nodes as the network grows . starting with an initial collection of @xmath2 connected nodes
, the barabasi - albert algorithm adds one node at a time to the network .
each new node is connected to @xmath3 existing nodes as follows .
the probability that the new node is connected to node @xmath4 is @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the degree of node @xmath4 and @xmath7 is the sum of the degrees of all the nodes in the current network .
the degree distribution resulting out of barabasi - albert model follows power law .
let @xmath8 be the initial graph with @xmath2 vertices , and @xmath9 be the random graph after @xmath10 nodes have been added by the barabasi - albert algorithm . for a constant @xmath11 , we define two users in @xmath9 to be strong friends if their neighbourhood overlap is more than @xmath12 . for a given @xmath12 , the strong friendship subgraph @xmath13 of @xmath9 is defined as follows .
the graph @xmath13 contains the same set of nodes as @xmath9 , and a pair of nodes @xmath0 and @xmath1 are connected by an edge in @xmath13 if and only if they are connected by an edge in @xmath9 and their neighbourhood overlap w.r.t .
@xmath9 is more than @xmath12 .
we run our experiments with three different values of @xmath12 , the threshold for the strong friendship between a pair of users . in each of the cases , we start with a complete graph with @xmath14 vertices , where @xmath15 is the the number of nodes every new node is connected to . in figures
[ fig1 ] , [ fig2 ] and [ fig3 ] , we plot the number of the users having at least @xmath16 ( @xmath16 and @xmath17 , respectively ) strong friends in @xmath13 against the size of the graph @xmath13 for a given @xmath15 and @xmath12 . in each of these plots
, we observe that this number increases till a point before starting to decrease . in figures
[ fig4 ] , [ fig5 ] and [ fig6 ] , we plot the size of the largest connected component ( lcc ) in @xmath13 against the size of the graph @xmath13 for a given @xmath15 and @xmath12 . in each of these plots , we observe that the size of the largest connected component increases till a point , before it reaches a peak and starts decreasing . also , the decline is sharper for higher values of @xmath12 .
our observations indicate that one possible explanation for the fall of myspace is that many of the users started to abandon it after they had a few strong friendships left in the network .
moreover , the remaining users found it difficult to survive as the core of the strong friendship subgraph started reducing in size .
since this might be the effect of preferential attachment where a popular user is likely to befriend a large number of other users , it would be interesting to see whether the same observation does nt hold for random evolving networks that have a restriction on the number of friends each person can have .
it is also an interesting open problem to estimate the size of the network where the plots turn downward , as a function of @xmath15 and @xmath12 , for either of the properties mentioned above .
j. p. onnela , j. saramaki , j. hyvonen , g. szabo , d. lazer , k. kaski , j. kertesz , and a. l. barabasi .
structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks .
usa , 104 : 7332 - 7336 , 2007 .
s. wu , a. das sarma , a. fabrikant , s. lattanzi and a. tomkins .
arrival and departure dynamics in social networks .
proceedings of the sixth acm international conference on web search and data mining ( wsdm ) , 233 - 242 , 2013 . | last decade seen emergence of popular online social networks like myspace orkut facebook myspace founded 2003 gained peak popularity 2008 most users abandoning it since 2008 cannarella spechler modified sir model of disease spread to explain this phenomenon disease spread model used to study arrival and departure dynamics of users in networks paper alternative explanation of rise and fall of myspace people join social networks due to presence friends leave due to inactivity friends large number social network friendships not active or strong friendships between users strong friendship indicated by regular communication dunbar s number says individual can maintain stable relationship with around 150 other people only strong friendships limited in social network no bound on number friends identify strong friendships onella et . al study greater neighbourhood overlap between friends corresponds to stronger friendships _ neighbourhood overlap _ between users and defined as number of nodes neighbours of both and divided by number of nodes neighbours of onestrong friendships important for user in social network @xcite study change in number of users minimum strong friendships in evolving social network by barabasi - albert model define strong friends if neighbourhood overlap larger than constant study change in size of largest connected component in strong friendship subgraph motivated by observation nodes in core more likely to survive than periphery consider largest connected component in strong friendship core important to retain most users model based on barabasi - albert model random scale - free networks based on preferential attachment growth preferential attachment node with higher degree more likely connected to new nodes as network grows adds one node at a time each new node connected to @xmath3 existing nodes probability new node connected to node @xmath4 is @xmath5 @xmath6 is degree of node @xmath4 and @xmath7 is sum of degrees of all nodes in current network degree distribution follows power law @xmath8 be initial graph with @xmath2 vertices @xmath9 random graph after @xmath10 nodes addedconstant @xmath11 define two users @xmath9 strong friends if neighbourhood overlap more than @xmath12 given @xmath12 strong friendship subgraph @xmath13 of @xmath9 defined graph @xmath13 contains same nodes as @xmath9 nodes @xmath0 and @xmath1 connected by edge @xmath13 if @xmath9 neighbourhood overlap @xmath9 more than @xmath12 run experiments with three values of @xmath12 threshold for strong friendship users start with complete graph with @xmath14 vertices @xmath15 number of nodes new node connected to figures fig1 fig2 fig3 plot number users having least @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) strong friends in @xmath13 against size graph @xmath13 for @xmath15 and @xmath12 number increases before figures fig4 fig5 fig6 plot size of largest connected component lcc ) in @xmath13 against size graph @xmath13 for @xmath15 @xmath12 size largest component increases decline sharper for higher values of @xmath12 observations indicate possible explanation fall of myspace users abandon after strong friendships leftremaining users difficult survive strong friendship subgraph reducing size effect preferential attachment popular user large interesting see observation random networks number friends problem estimate size network where plots turn downward function @xmath15 @xmath12 j p. onnela j. saramaki hyvonen g szabo d lazer k kaski j kertesz a l. barabasi structure tie strengths in mobile communication networks usa , 104 : 7332 - 7336 2007 s. wu a. das sarma. fabrikant s. lattanzi a. tomkins arrival departure dynamics in social networks proceedings sixth international conference web search data mining 233 - 242 , 2013 | 0.264497 | 1,537 | 768 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,442 | an investigation of the polar angle distribution of charged hadrons is presented using data taken by the jade experiment at the petra collider at centre - of - mass energies of @xmath0 and @xmath1 gev . from fits to the polar angle distribution the longitudinal , @xmath2 , and transverse , @xmath3 , cross - section relative to the total hadronic are determined at an average energy scale of @xmath4 gev .
the results are @xmath5 where total errors are given and the results are exactly anti - correlated . using the next - to - leading order qcd prediction for the longitudinal cross - section , the value @xmath6 of the strong coupling constant is obtained in agreement with the world average value of @xmath7 evolved to an energy scale of @xmath4 gev . to * measurement of the + longitudinal and transverse cross - section + in e@xmath8e@xmath9 annihilation at @xmath10-@xmath11 gev
* m. blumenstengel@xmath12 , o. biebel@xmath12 , p.a .
movilla fernndez@xmath12 , p. pfeifenschneider@xmath13 , s. bethke@xmath12 , s. kluth@xmath12 and the jade collaboration@xmath14 submitted to phys .
lett .
b @xmath12 max - planck - institut fr physik , d-80805 mnchen , germany + contact e - mail : biebel@mppmu.mpg.de + @xmath14 for a full list of members of the jade collaboration see reference @xcite + @xmath15 now at sap deutschland ag & co. kg , neurottstrae 15 , 69190 walldorf , germany | the energy and the momentum spectrum of a hadron @xmath16 produced in the annihilation process @xmath17 is described by a fragmentation function @xmath18 . here
@xmath19 is either the fractional momentum , @xmath20 , or the fractional energy , @xmath21 , carried by a hadron @xmath16 , and @xmath22 is the centre - of - mass energy of the annihilation process with total hadronic cross - section @xmath23 . in the case of unpolarized e@xmath24 beams , and
averaging over the polarization of the hadron @xmath16 , the fragmentation function receives contributions from the transverse ( @xmath25 ) and longitudinal ( @xmath26 ) polarization states of the intermediate electroweak vector bosons , @xmath27 and , and from their interference yielding an asymmetric contribution ( @xmath28 ) .
the most general form of the differential cross - section for the inclusive single - particle production in annihilation is @xcite @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the polar angle between the direction of the incoming and the outgoing hadron @xmath16 . at centre - of - mass energies much larger than the mass of the produced quark @xmath31 , the longitudinal contribution is negligible @xcite due to the helicity structure at the quarks production vertex .
a sizeable contribution to the longitudinal fragmentation function , however , comes from gluon radiation from the @xmath32 system in the final state @xcite .
the asymmetric contribution is largest at energies below and above but very small at the z peak . even though it is @xmath33-@xmath34% of the transverse cross - section @xcite in the energy range of @xmath0 through @xmath1 gev considered for this analysis , the required experimental distinction of quark and antiquark renders a measurement of the asymmetric contribution virtually impossible .
it , therefore , was not considered for this analysis .
the fragmentation functions are related to the perturbatively calculable ratios of the longitudinal , @xmath2 , and transverse , @xmath3 , cross - sections to the total cross - section .
integrating eq .
( [ eqn - costheta - dependence ] ) over @xmath35 and respecting energy conservation for the integral over @xmath19 yields @xcite @xmath36 where @xmath37 the contribution of gluon radiation to @xmath38 has been calculated in second order of @xmath7 @xcite . at first order
the qcd correction in the total cross - section contributes only to the longitudinal part @xcite : @xmath39 where @xmath40 is the born level cross - section .
this allows tests of qcd and determinations of @xmath7 from measurements of @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
the longitudinal and transverse fragmentation functions were already investigated by the slac / lbl magnetic detector collaboration at the spear collider at @xmath43 gev @xcite , by the tasso collaboration at the petra collider at @xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 gev @xcite , and by the opal , aleph , and delphi collaborations at the lep collider at @xmath47 @xcite .
ratios @xmath41 to derive @xmath48 were only determined by the opal and delphi collaborations @xcite . due to the sum rule eq .
( [ eqn - sumrule ] ) all details of the unknown fragmentation functions disappear from the longitudinal and transverse cross - sections up to corrections suppressed by some power of @xmath49 .
a measurement of these cross - sections at centre - of - mass energies different from @xmath50 is , therefore , indispensable to experimentally investigate the question whether power corrections to eq .
( [ eqn - sigma_tot ] ) are required and whether these are of the form @xmath49 or @xmath51 @xcite . the analysis presented in the
following determines @xmath41 , @xmath42 , and @xmath7 at an average energy of @xmath52 gev .
it uses data measured with the jade detector @xcite at the petra collider to be introduced in section [ sec - detector ] .
the measurement of the @xmath35 distribution and the investigation of the experimental systematics are detailed in section [ sec - costheta ] .
section [ sec - observables ] presents the results from the fits to the measured @xmath35 distribution .
power corrections to eq .
( [ eqn - sigma_tot ] ) are considered in section [ sec - powercorrection ] .
our final results for @xmath41 , @xmath42 , and @xmath7 are summarized in section [ sec - summary ] .
.[tab - selection - cuts ] the main cuts are listed for the selection of multihadronic events which were varied to assess systematic uncertainties ( see text ) . @xmath53 and @xmath54 are energy and 3-momentum of tracks and clusters . [ cols="<,<",options="header " , ] in this table , the contributions of the statistical uncertainties due to data and monte carlo simulation are given separately to illustrate the possible gain from a larger sample of simulated events on the total errors .
[ fig - sigmal - vs - q ] shows our result and those obtained at the z peak @xcite for the ratio of the longitudinal and total cross - section versus the centre - of - mass energy .
neither the measurement of the slac / lbl magnetic detector @xcite nor that of the tasso collaboration @xcite were considered for the study of power corrections . the results published by the slac / lbl collaboration , from which @xmath55(stat . ) at @xmath56 gev can be derived , are solely quoted with statistical uncertainties .
the tasso collaboration used for their investigations a limited the @xmath19 range of @xmath57-@xmath58 only .
longitudinal cross - section relative to the total cross - section is presented versus centre - of - mass energy .
the results obtained at the z peak are also shown .
the dotted and solid lines show , respectively , the jetset @xcite expectation for partons and stable particles .
the dashed line is the second order qcd prediction , eq .
( [ eqn - qcd - prediction ] ) , using @xmath59 @xcite .
, scaledwidth=100.0% ] even though the application of the sum rule , eq .
( [ eqn - sumrule ] ) , should absorb all the details about the fragmentation functions a large difference exists between the jetset expectations at parton and at hadron level .
this indicates a substantial hadronization correction which is expected to behave as a leading order @xmath49 power correction @xcite . for the study of the power correction to the longitudinal cross - section we used the parametrization of @xcite where the power correction is given by @xmath60 here
@xmath61 is the milan factor , @xmath62 , usually chosen to be @xmath63 gev , is the infrared matching scale of the non - perturbative term with the perturbative terms .
the non - calculable parameter @xmath64 is to be determined from a fit to the data .
the coefficient of the power correction for @xmath2 given in @xcite is @xmath65 when being adapted for the parametrization chosen in eq .
( [ eqn - powcor - formula ] ) . since the available @xmath41 data are not sufficiently precise for a detailed test of the power corrections , we solely quote for illustrative purposes the result @xmath66 and @xmath67 from fitting the second order plus power correction prediction .
this yielded : @xmath68 where the errors propagated from the total uncertainties of the @xmath41 data . with the large uncertainties and without further data no definite conclusion about the power correction for the longitudinal cross - section is possible .
the size of the power correction expected at the z peak was estimated to be @xmath69 @xcite using the measured value of @xmath41 at @xmath70 quoted in @xcite .
this paper presents the first measurement of the longitudinal and transverse cross - sections at petra energies of 35 through 44 gev .
values of @xmath71 were obtained for the longitudinal and transverse cross - sections relative to the total hadronic cross - section , where the errors are statistical and systematics .
the two results are exactly anti - correlated since the relative transverse cross - section was obtained using the relation ( [ eqn - sigma_tot ] ) .
the statistical errors are due to the data and the limited monte carlo simulation statistics which are about equal in size . using the second order qcd prediction for the relative longitudinal cross - section ,
a value of @xmath72 was determined for the strong coupling constant at the luminosity weighted average centre - of - mass energy of @xmath4 gev . evolved to the z peak using the 3-loop formula from @xcite
this result corresponds to @xmath73 with total errors , which is in agreement with the current average @xmath74 @xcite .
power corrections to the longitudinal cross - section were considered .
the available measurements at @xmath4 gev and @xmath75 gev are not sufficient yet for a definite conclusion .
m.b . thanks the members of the iii .
physikalisches institut of the rwth aachen for their generous hospitality and many helpful discussions .
t. sjstrand : comput .
* 39 * ( 1986 ) 347 , + t. sjstrand and m. bengtsson : comput .
* 43 * ( 1987 ) 367 .
+ we used version 6.3 of jetset as used by the jade collaboration with parameters from @xcite to generate the events . | energy momentum spectrum hadron @xmath16 annihilation process described by fragmentation function @xmath18 @xmath19 fractional momentum energy carried by hadron @xmath16 @xmath22 centre - of - mass energy hadronic cross - section @xmath23 unpolarized@xmath24 beams over polarization hadron fragmentation function receives contributions from transverse longitudinal polarization intermediate electroweak vector bosons @xmath27 interference asymmetric contribution @xmath28 differential cross - section for single particle production annihilation is @xcite @xmath29 polar angle between incoming outgoing hadron @xmath16 at centre - of - mass energies larger than quark @xmath31 longitudinal contribution negligible due to helicity structure production vertex sizeable contribution longitudinal fragmentation from gluon radiation @xmath32 system asymmetric contribution largest at energies below above small at z peak @xmath33-@xmath34% of transverse cross - section energy range through distinction of quark antiquark measurement asymmetric contribution impossible not consideredfragmentation functions related to ratios longitudinal transverse @xmath3 cross - sections to total cross - section integrating eq - dependence over @xmath35 respecting energy conservation @xmath19 yields @xmath36 contribution gluon radiation to @xmath38 calculated second order @xmath7 qcd correction contributes to longitudinal part @xmath39 @xmath40 born level cross - section allows tests qcd determinations @xmath7 from measurements @xmath41 @xmath42 longitudinal transverse fragmentation functions investigated by slac / lbl magnetic detector collaboration spear collider tasso collaboration collider opal aleph delphi collaborations ratios @xmath41 to @xmath48 determined by opal delphi collaborations sum rule details unknown fragmentation functions disappear from longitudinal transverse cross - sections corrections suppressed by power @xmath49 measurement cross - sections at centre - mass energies different from @xmath50 indispensable to investigate power corrections to eq - sigma_tot required @xmath49 or @xmath51 @xciteanalysis determines @xmath41 @xmath7 average energy @xmath52 gev uses data jade detector @xcite petra collider sec - detector measurement @xmath35 distribution investigation experimental systematics detailed in sec - costheta ] sec - observables presents results @xmath35 distribution power corrections to eq considered in section sec - powercorrection ] final results for @xmath41 @xmath7 summarized sec - summary ] - selection - cuts main cuts for multihadronic events varied systematic uncertainties @xmath53 @xmath54 are energy 3-momentum tracks clusters contributions statistical uncertainties due data monte carlo simulation gain larger sample total errors fig - sigmal - vs - q ] shows result z peak @xcite ratio longitudinal total cross - section versus centre - of - mass energy measurement slac / lbl magnetic detector @xcite tasso collaboration @xcite considered for power corrections results slac / lbl collaboration @xmath55 @xmath56 quoted with statistical uncertainties tasso collaboration @xmath19 range @xmath57-@xmath58longitudinal cross - section versus centre - of - mass energy results at z peak dotted solid lines show jetset @xcite expectation for partons stable particles dashed line second order qcd prediction using @xmath59 @xcite scaledwidth=100.0% sum rule large difference between jetset expectations at parton hadron level indicates substantial hadronization correction leading order @xmath49 power correction @xcite power correction used parametrization @xcite power correction by @xmath60 @xmath61 milan factor @xmath62 infrared matching scale of non - perturbative term perturbative terms non - calculable parameter @xmath64 determined from fit data coefficient of power correction for @xmath2 in @xcite is @xmath65 for parametrization @xmath41 data not precise for power corrections quote for illustrative result @xmath66 and @xmath67 from fitting second order plus power correction prediction yielded @xmath68 errors propagated from uncertainties @xmath41 data large uncertainties without further data no definite conclusion about power correction for longitudinal cross - section possiblepower correction z peak estimated @xmath69 @xcite @xmath41 @xmath70 paper presents first measurement longitudinal transverse cross - sections at petra energies 35 44 gev values @xmath71 obtained longitudinal transverse cross - sections hadronic cross - section errors statistical systematics results anti - correlated relative transverse cross - section obtained relation eqn - sigma_tot ] statistical errors due to data monte carlo simulation statistics equal second order qcd prediction longitudinal - section value @xmath72 determined strong coupling constant luminosity weighted average centre - - mass energy @xmath4 gev z peak 3-loop formula @xcite result corresponds @xmath73 total errors agreement average @xmath74 @xcite power corrections longitudinal cross - section considered measurements at @xmath4 @xmath75 gev not sufficient definite conclusion iii physikalisches institut aachen hospitality discussions sjstrand 1986 347 bengtsson 1987 367 used version 6.3 jetset parameters @xcite events | 0.314793 | 2,129 | 1,056 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,460 | we use gauge / string duality to _ analytically _ evaluate the renormalized polyakov loop in pure yang - mills theories . for @xmath0 , the result is in a quite good agreement with lattice simulations for a broad temperature range . | it is well known that a pure @xmath1 gauge theory at high temperature undergoes a phase transition .
this phase transition is of special interest because of many its aspects can be characterized precisely @xcite . in particular , the order parameter is given by the polyakov loop @xmath2 \,,\ ] ] where the trace is over the fundamental representation , @xmath3 is a periodic variable of period @xmath4 , with @xmath5 the temperature , @xmath6 is a gauge coupling constant , and @xmath7 is a vector potential in the time direction .
the usual interpretation of is as a phase factor associated to the propagation of an infinitely heavy test quark in the fundamental representation of the gauge group . until recently ,
the lattice formulation , still struggling with limitations and system errors , and effective field theories were the main computational tools to deal with non - weakly coupled gauge theories .
the polyakov loop was also intensively studied ( see , for example , @xcite and references therein ) .
the situation changed drastically with the invention of the ads / cft correspondence @xcite that resumed interest in another tool , string theory . in this note
we continue a series of recent studies @xcite devoted to a search for an effective string description of pure gauge theories . in @xcite ,
the model was presented for computing the heavy quark and multi - quark potentials at zero temperature .
subsequent comparison @xcite with the available lattice data has made it clear that the model should be taken seriously .
later , this model was extended to finite temperature .
the results obtained for the spatial string tension @xcite and the thermodynamics @xcite are remarkably consistent with the lattice , too . as is known , qcd is a very rich theory supposed to describe the whole spectrum of strong interaction phenomena .
the question naturally arises : how well does the model describe other aspects of quenched qcd ? here , we attempt to _ analytically _ evaluate the polyakov loop as an important step toward answering this question @xcite . in addition
, a good motivation for this test is lattice data revealed recently by @xcite . before proceeding to the detailed analysis ,
let us set the basic framework .
as in @xcite , we take the following ansatz for the five - dimensional background geometry @xmath8 where @xmath9 .
@xmath10 is a deformation parameter whose value can be fixed from the critical temperature @xcite .
we take a constant dilaton and discard other background fields . in discussing the wilson and polyakov loops within the gauge / string duality @xcite , one first chooses a contour @xmath11 on a four - manifold which is the boundary of a five - dimensional manifold .
next , one has to study fundamental strings on this manifold such that the string world - sheet has @xmath11 as its boundary . in the case of interest
, @xmath11 is an interval between @xmath12 and @xmath4 on the @xmath3-axis .
the expectation value of the polyakov loop is schematically given by the world - sheet path integral @xmath13 where @xmath14 denotes a set of world - sheet fields .
@xmath15 is a world - sheet action . in principle , the integral can be evaluated approximately in terms of minimal surfaces that obey the boundary conditions .
the result is written as @xmath16 $ ] , where @xmath17 means a renormalized minimal area whose weight is @xmath18 .
given the background metric , we can attempt to calculate the expectation value of the polyakov loop by using the nambu - goto action for @xmath15 in @xmath19 here @xmath20 is the background metric . in the case of interest , this action describes a fundamental string stretched between the test quark on @xmath11 ( at @xmath21 ) and the horizon at @xmath22 .
since we are interested in static configurations , we choose @xmath23 , @xmath24 .
this yields @xmath25 where @xmath26 . a prime stands for a derivative with respect to @xmath27 .
now it is easy to find the equation of motion for @xmath28 @xmath29'=0 \,.\ ] ] it is obvious that eq . has a special solution @xmath30 that represents a straight string stretched between the boundary and the horizon .
since this solution makes the dominant contribution , as seen from the integrand in , we wo nt dwell on other solutions here .
having found the solution , we can now compute the corresponding minimal area . since the integral is divergent at @xmath21 due to the factor @xmath31 in the metric
, we regularize it by imposing a cutoff @xmath32 @xmath33 subtracting the @xmath34 term ( quark mass ) and letting @xmath35 , we get a renormalized area @xmath36 where @xmath37 is a normalization constant which is scheme - dependent .
next , we can perform the integral over @xmath27 .
the result is @xmath38 in this formula @xmath39 is given by @xmath40 @xcite . combining the weight factor with the normalization constant as @xmath41 , we find @xmath42 \,,\ ] ] with @xmath43 the imaginary error function
this is our main result .
it is of great interest to compare the temperature dependence of with other results for the high temperature phase of @xmath1 gauge theory . in doing so , we start with lattice
qcd . clearly , @xmath44 is of primary importance . in fig.1
a comparison is shown with the recent data of @xcite .
we see that our model is in a quite good agreement with the lattice for a broad temperature range @xmath45 .
the maximum discrepancy occurred at @xmath46 is of order 15% .
it rapidly decreases with temperature reaching 2% at @xmath47 and becoming almost negligible up to @xmath48 .
then , it starts to grow back again . for completeness , we can fit the value of @xmath49 to be @xmath50 that significantly improves accuracy .
for example , at @xmath46 it becomes of order 6% .
one possible explanation for the better fit is that we have evaluated classically ( in terms of strings ) .
if we take into account semi - classical corrections , then the value of @xmath49 gets renormalized . for practical purposes , the expression looks somewhat awkward .
following @xcite , we expand @xmath51 and @xmath52 in powers of @xmath53 . if we ignore all higher terms , then a final result can be written in two simple forms : @xmath54 \,,\ ] ] or @xmath55 in fig.2 we have plotted the results . as can be seen , above @xmath56
the discrepancy between the expression and approximations - is negligible . at lower t the approximation ( exponential law )
it shows a significant deviation from the lattice .
in particular , the discrepancy occurred at @xmath46 is of order 27% . on the other hand ,
the agreement between the approximation ( power law ) and the lattice is spectacular .
for the temperature range @xmath45 the power law provides a reliable approximation to lattice qcd with accuracy better than 5% !
moreover , one can use it to describe all available lattice data of @xcite at lower @xmath5 .
then , the maximum discrepancy occurred at the lowest available value @xmath57 is of order 7% .
it is worth noting that the exponential law has been suggested in @xcite based on a dimension - two condensate @xmath58 @xcite .
such a condensate as well as its possible links to the uv renormalon and @xmath59 corrections got intensively discussed in the qcd literature @xcite . as was first shown in @xcite ,
the deformation parameter @xmath10 of the background geometry is tied into the appearance of the quadratic corrections .
it is not , therefore , surprising that we have recovered in our calculations .
interestingly , the power law is very similar to that observed for the pressure in @xcite .
indeed , for @xmath60 the pressure is simply @xmath61 .
in this note we have evaluated the polyakov loop using the now standard ideas motivated by gauge / string duality .
a key point is the use of the background metric which is singled out by the earlier works @xcite .
( note that there is no need for any free parameters except a scheme - dependent normalization constant @xmath62 . )
the overall conclusion is that the same background metric results in a very satisfactory description of the polyakov loop as well .
of course , we still have a lot more to learn before answering the question posed at the beginning of this note .
we would like to thank r.d .
pisarski and p. weisz for useful discussions , and s. hofmann for reading the manuscript .
this work is supported in part by dfg " excellence cluster and the alexander von humboldt foundation under grant no .
phys0167 .
99 a.m. polyakov , phys.lett.b * 72 * , 477 ( 1978 ) ; g.t hooft , nucl.phys.b * 138 * , 1 ( 1978 ) ; l. susskind , phys.rev.d * 20 * , 2610 ( 1979 ) ; b. svetitsky and l.g .
yaffe , nucl.phys.b * 210 * , 423 ( 1982 ) .
pisarski , `` qcd phase diagram , lectures presented at the ' ' 47 internationale universit " atswochen f " ur theoretische physik
, schladming , austria , march 2009 ; + see also http://physik.uni-graz.at/itp/iutp/iutp@xmath6309/ + lecturenotes/pisarski/pisarski@xmath632.pdf .
maldacena , adv.theor.math.phys .
* 2 * , 231 ( 1998 ) ; + s.s .
gubser , i.r .
klebanov , and a.m. polyakov , phys . + lett .
b * 428 * , 105 ( 1998 ) ; e. witten , adv.theor.math .
* 2 * , 253 ( 1998 ) .
o. andreev and v.i .
zakharov , phys.rev.d * 74 * , 025023 ( 2006 ) ; o. andreev , phys.rev.d * 78 * , 065007 ( 2008 ) .
o. andreev and v.i .
zakharov , phys.lett.b * 645 * , 437 ( 2007 ) ; o. andreev , phys.lett.b * 659 * , 416 ( 2008 ) .
o. andreev , phys.rev.d * 76 * , 087702 ( 2007 ) .
white , phys.lett.b * 652 * , 79 ( 2007 ) .
see also the earlier work which deals with numerical estimates , o. andreev and v.i .
zakharov , jhep * 04 * , ( 2007 ) 100 .
s. gupta , k. huebner , and o. kaczmarek , phys.rev .
d*77 * , 034503 ( 2008 ) .
alternatively , it may be fixed from the heavy quark potentials @xcite .
while a significant literature on the wilson loops has grown , there has been relatively little investigation of the polyakov loop . for some developments , see however e. witten , adv.theor.math.phys . * 2 * , 505 ( 1998 ) ; a. hartnoll and s. prem kumar , phys.rev.d*74 * , 026001 ( 2006 ) ; m. headrick , phys.rev.d*77 * , 105017 ( 2008 ) .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola , and l.l .
salcedo , jhep * 0601 * , 073 ( 2006 ) .
celenza and c.m .
shakin , phys.rev.d * 34 * , 1591 ( 1986 ) . for a review ,
zakharov , nucl.phys.proc.suppl .
* 74 * , 392 ( 1999 ) and references therein .
o. andreev , phys.rev.d * 73 * , 107901 ( 2006 ) .
pisarski , prog.theor.phys.suppl.*168 * , 276 ( 2007 ) . | pure @xmath1 gauge theory at high temperature undergoes phase transition transition aspects characterized @xcite order parameter given by polyakov loop @xmath2 trace over fundamental representation @xmath3 is periodic variable of period @xmath4 @xmath5 temperature @xmath6 gauge coupling constant @xmath7 vector potential in time direction usual interpretation phase factor associated to propagation of infinitely heavy test quark in fundamental representation gauge group lattice formulation effective field theories were main computational tools non - weakly coupled gauge theories polyakov loop studied situation changed with invention ads / cft correspondence @xcite resumed interest in string theory recent studies @xcite for effective string description of pure gauge theories model presented for computing heavy quark and multi - quark potentials at zero temperature comparison with lattice data model seriously extended to finite temperature results for spatial string tension thermodynamics consistent with lattice qcd rich theory strong interaction phenomena question how well does model describe other aspects of quenched qcd ? attempt to evaluate polyakov loop important step toward answering questionmotivation for test is lattice data by @xcite before analysis set basic framework ansatz for five - dimensional background geometry @xmath8 @xmath10 deformation parameter fixed from critical temperature constant dilaton discard background fields discussing wilson polyakov loops gauge / string duality chooses contour @xmath11 on four - manifold boundary of five - dimensional manifold study fundamental strings on manifold - @xmath11 boundary @xmath11 interval between @xmath12 and @xmath4 on @xmath3-axis expectation value of polyakov loop by world - sheet path integral @xmath13 @xmath14 world - sheet fields @xmath15 world - sheet action integral evaluated minimal surfaces boundary conditions result as @xmath16 @xmath17 renormalized minimal area weight is @xmath18 calculate expectation value polyakov loop nambu - goto action for @xmath15 @xmath20 background metric describes fundamental string between test quark on @xmath11 and horizon at @xmath22 static configurations choose @xmath23 @xmath24 yields @xmath25 @xmath26 prime for derivative @xmath27 easy to find equation of motion for @xmath28 @xmath29'=0 eq . has special solution @xmath30 straight string between boundary horizon solution dominant contribution found solution compute minimal area integral divergent at @xmath21 due to factor @xmath31 regularize cutoff @xmath32 @xmath33 subtracting @xmath34 term quark mass @xmath35 renormalized area @xmath36 @xmath37 normalization constant scheme - dependent perform integral over @xmath27 result is @xmath38 @xmath39 given by @xmath40 @xcite combining weight factor normalization constant @xmath41 find @xmath42 with @xmath43 imaginary error function main result compare temperature dependence high temperature phase of @xmath1 gauge theory start with lattice qcd @xmath44 primary importance fig.1 comparison with recent data @xcite model good agreement with lattice for broad temperature range @xmath45 maximum discrepancy at @xmath46 15% decreases temperature 2% at @xmath47 negligible up to @xmath48 fit value of @xmath49 to @xmath50 improves accuracyat @xmath46 6% explanation evaluated classically strings semi - classical corrections value of @xmath49 renormalized expression looks awkward following expand @xmath51 @xmath52 in powers of @xmath53 ignore higher terms final result in two forms : @xmath54 or @xmath55 in fig.2 plotted results above @xmath56 discrepancy between expression approximations negligible lower approximation shows significant deviation from lattice discrepancy at @xmath46 27% agreement between approximation power law and lattice spectacular for temperature range @xmath45 power law provides reliable approximation to lattice qcd accuracy better than 5% describe all lattice data of @xcite at lower @xmath5 maximum discrepancy at lowest value @xmath57 7% exponential law suggested in @xcite based on dimension - two condensate @xmath58 @xcite condensate links to uv renormalon @xmath59 corrections discussed in qcd literature @xcite deformation parameter @xmath10 of background geometry tied into appearance quadratic corrections recovered in calculations power law similar to pressure in @xcite @xmath60 pressure @xmath61 evaluated polyakov loop standard ideas gauge / string duality key point background metric singled out earlier works @xcite no need free parameters except scheme - dependent normalization constant @xmath62 conclusion background metric satisfactory description polyakov loop more to learn before answering question thank r pisarski p. weisz discussions s. hofmann manuscript supported by dfg cluster alexander von humboldt foundation grant phys0167 polyakov phys.lett.b * 72 477 ( 1978 ) hooft nucl.phys.b 138 1 1978 ) susskind phys.rev.d 20 2610 ( 1979 ) svetitsky yaffe nucl.phys.b 210 423 ( 1982 ) pisarski qcd phase diagram lectures 47 internationale universit atswochen theoretische physik schladming austria march 2009 http://physik.uni-graz.at/itp/iutp@xmath6309 lecturenotes/pisarski@xmath632.pdf maldacena adv.theor.math.phys . 2 231 ( 1998 ) gubser klebanov polyakov phys . lett428 105 ( 1998 ) witten adv.theor.math 2 253 ( 1998 ) andreev zakharov.rev.d 74 025023 ( 2006 ) andreev 78 065007 ( 2008 ) andreev zakharov phys.lett.b 645 437 ( 2007 ) 659 416 ( 2008 ).rev.d 76 087702 ( 2007 ) white.lett.b 652 79 ( 2007 ) earlier work numerical estimates andreev zakharov jhep 04 * 2007 ) 100 gupta huebner o kaczmarek.rev d*77 034503 ( 2008 ) fixed heavy quark potentials literature wilson loops little investigation polyakov loop witten adv.theor.math.phys 2 505 ( 1998 ) hartnoll prem kumar phys.rev.d*74 026001 ( 2006 ) headrick phys.rev.d*77 * 105017 ( 2008 ) e megias ruiz arriola salcedo jhep 0601 073 ( 2006 ) celenza shakin phys.rev.d 34 * 1591 ( 1986 )review zakharov nucl.phys.proc.suppl 74 392 1999 ) references andreev.rev 73 107901 2006 pisarski prog.theor.phys.suppl.*168 276 2007 ) | 0.434872 | 2,769 | 1,463 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,469 | e@xmath0e@xmath1 annihilation data recorded by the jade detector at petra were used to measure the @xmath2-parameter for the first time at @xmath3 and @xmath4 gev .
the distributions were compared to a resummed qcd calculation which recently became available for this observable .
in addition , we applied extended resummed calculations to the heavy and wide jet broadening variables , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , which now include a proper treatment of the quark recoil against multi - gluon emission with single - logarithmic accuracy .
we further investigated power corrections to the mean values of the observables mentioned above . in this study , we considered all available e@xmath0e@xmath1 data between @xmath7 and @xmath8 gev . to * measurement of @xmath2-parameter + and determination of @xmath9 from +
@xmath2-parameter and jet broadening + at petra energies * p.a .
movilla fernndez@xmath10 , o. biebel@xmath10 , s. bethke@xmath10 + and the jade collaboration@xmath11 @xmath10 \iii .
institut der rwth aachen , d-52056 aachen , germany + contact e - mail : otmar.biebel@physik.rwth-aachen.de + @xmath11 for a full list of members of the jade collaboration see reference @xcite | in a recent publication @xcite we have presented a study of event shapes observables and determinations of @xmath9 using data of @xmath12 annihilations at @xmath13 to @xmath4 gev recorded with the former jade detector @xcite at the petra collider .
this study provided valuable information which was not available before from @xmath14-annihilations in the petra energy range .
the results on @xmath9 , obtained in a similar manner as those from the experiments at lep , demonstrated that the energy dependence of @xmath15 is in good agreement with the prediction of quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) . evolved to the @xmath16 mass scale , the results are in good agreement with those obtained at lep , and are of similar precision .
in addition , power corrections , applied to analytic qcd calculations of the mean values of event shape distributions , were found to qualitatively and quantitatively match the effects of hadronisation .
thus qcd could be tested without the need of phenomenological hadronisation models .
meanwhile the perturbative calculations for the jet broadening variables were improved by including a proper treatment of quark recoil @xcite .
furthermore for the @xmath2-parameter a resummation of leading and next - to - leading logarithm terms to all orders of @xmath9 ( nlla ) became available @xcite . beside these advances in the perturbative description of event shape observables progress was made in the understanding of non - perturbative power corrections to the event shape observables and their mean values .
in particular two - loop calculations of such corrections were performed @xcite which modify the one - loop result of the power correction to the event shapes by a factor ( milan factor ) . in this paper
we complement our previous publication by a new @xmath17+nlla determination of @xmath9 from @xmath2-parameter and update the determination from jet broadening at @xmath18 and @xmath4 gev in the sections [ sec - procedure ] and [ sec - alphas ] .
we also applied power corrections to the @xmath2-parameter distributions and re - investigated those for the mean values of the thrust , heavy jet mass and both jet broadening observables in section [ sec - meanvalues ] .
we start in section [ sec - data ] with a brief summary of the data samples used and draw conclusions from our results in section [ sec - conclusions ] .
we analysed data recorded with the jade detector in 1984 to 1986 at centre - of - mass energies of @xmath19-@xmath20 gev and around @xmath21 gev .
the jade detector was operated from 1979 until 1986 at the petra electron - positron collider at centre - of - mass energies of @xmath22 to @xmath20 gev .
a detailed description of the jade detector can be found in @xcite .
the main components of the detector were the central jet chamber to measure charged particle tracks and the lead glass calorimeter to measure energy depositions of electromagnetic showers , which both covered almost the whole solid angle of @xmath23 .
multihadronic events were selected by the standard jade selection cuts @xcite .
all charged particle tracks , assumed to be pions , with a total momentum of @xmath24 mev@xmath25 were considered in the analysis .
energy clusters in the electromagnetic calorimeter , assumed to be photons , were considered if their energies exceeded @xmath26 mev after correction for energy deposited by associated tracks .
background from two - photon processes and @xmath27-pair events and from events with hard initial state photon radiation were removed by cuts on the visible energy @xmath28 , the total missing momentum @xmath29 ( @xmath30 and @xmath31 are the 3-momentum and the energy of the tracks and clusters ) , the longitudinal balance relative to the @xmath12 beam axis of momenta @xmath32 and the polar angle of the thrust axis , @xmath33 : * @xmath34 ; * @xmath35 ; * @xmath36 ; * @xmath37 .
thus the backgrounds from @xmath38 and @xmath27-pair events were reduced to less than @xmath39 and @xmath40 , respectively @xcite .
the numbers of events which were retained after these cuts for this analysis are listed in table [ tab - eventnumbers ] .
.[tab - eventnumbers ] number of events in data and in monte carlo detector simulation retained after application of the multihadron selection cuts described in the text . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] | recent publication presented study event shapes observables determinations @xmath9 using data @xmath12 annihilations @xmath13 to @xmath4 gev recorded former jade detector @xcite petra collider study provided information @xmath14-annihilations petra energy range results @xmath9 experiments lep demonstrated energy dependence @xmath15 prediction quantum chromodynamics qcd ) evolved @xmath16 mass scale results agreement lep similar precision power corrections applied analytic qcd calculations mean values event shape distributions match effects hadronisation qcd tested without phenomenological hadronisation models perturbative calculations jet broadening variables improved treatment quark recoil @xmath2-parameter resummation leading next - - leading logarithm terms all orders @xmath9 available advances progress understanding non - perturbative power corrections mean values two - loop calculations corrections performed modify one - loop result power correction factor paper complement previous publication new @xmath17+nlla determination @xmath9 @xmath2-parameter update determination jet broadening at @xmath18 @xmath4 gev sections [ sec - procedure ] sec - alphas ]applied power corrections @xmath2-parameter distributions re - investigated mean values thrust heavy jet mass jet broadening observables section sec - meanvalues - data summary data samples draw conclusions analysed data jade detector 1984 to 1986 energies @xmath19-@xmath20 gev @xmath21 gev operated 1979 until 1986 petra electron - positron collider centre mass energies @xmath22 to @xmath20 gev detailed description detector in @xcite components central jet chamber lead glass calorimeter energy depositions electromagnetic showers covered solid angle @xmath23 multihadronic events selected standard jade selection cuts charged particle tracks pions total momentum @xmath24 mev@xmath25 considered energy clusters electromagnetic calorimeter photons considered if exceeded @xmath26 mev after correction energybackground two - photon processes @xmath27-pair events hard initial state photon radiation removed by cuts visible energy @xmath28 missing momentum @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 3-momentum energy tracks clusters longitudinal balance @xmath12 beam axis @xmath32 polar angle thrust axis @xmath33 backgrounds from @xmath38 @xmath27-pair events reduced less than @xmath39 @xmath40 numbers events retained after cuts listed in table [ tab - eventnumbers ] number events data monte carlo detector simulation retained after multihadron selection cuts | 0.1817 | 1,015 | 514 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,484 | in quantum statistical mechanics , equilibrium states have been shown to be the typical states for a system that is entangled with its environment , suggesting a possible identification between thermodynamic and von neumann entropies . in this paper
, we investigate how the relaxation toward equilibrium is made possible through interactions that do not lead to significant exchange of energy , and argue for the validity of the second law of thermodynamics at the microscopic scale .
the vast majority of phenomena we witness in every day life are irreversible . from the erosion of cliffs under the repeated onslaughts of the ocean to the erasure of our memories , we experience the unyielding flow of time .
thermodynamics , originally the science of heat engines , allows us to predict simple macroscopic processes such as the melting down of an ice cube forgotten on the kitchen table , by the mean of two laws : the conservation of energy and the growth of entropy . among the wealth of things we are given to perceive ,
there are also a few phenomena showing a high degree of regularity . through the trajectories of planets and stars in the sky , through the swinging of a pendulum clock ,
we encounter the immutability of time .
these led to the development of mechanics and time - reversible dynamical laws .
this description of nature extends below atomic scale provided that quantum variables , represented by non - commuting operators , are introduced .
the revolution initiated in the second half of the @xmath0 century by the founders of statistical mechanics was to understand that thermodynamics emerges from the microscopic structure of matter ; this idea had actually been suggested by d. bernoulli in _ hydrodynamica _ ( 1738 ) .
+ recently , a new approach to the foundations of statistical mechanics , sometimes called typicality , has been proposed @xcite . rather than the usual time or ensemble
averages , this alternative viewpoint finds its roots in the genuinely quantum notion of entanglement . for a composite system in a pure state ,
each component , when taken apart , appears in a probabilistic mixture of quantum states , that is , even individual states can exhibit statistical properties .
for instance , in the case of a system in contact with a heat bath , it has been shown that its density matrix is generically very close to a thermal state @xcite .
this result has been extended to more complicated couplings between the system and its surrounding ( see @xcite for details and proofs ) .
concretely , one considers a system @xmath1 and its environment , subjected to a constraint @xmath2 ( e.g. fixing the total energy ) . in terms of hilbert spaces
, that means @xmath3 .
if the number of degrees of freedom composing the system is small compared to the one of the environment , then for most @xmath4 ( in the sense of the haar measure on the unit sphere ) , one gets @xmath5 in other words , in the framework of typicality , the actual state of the system at some instant of time is very likely to resemble the equilibrium state . for that reason ,
it is legitimate to use the latter to estimate standard statistical quantities like expectation values of observables or von neumann entropy @xmath6 .
however , from this perspective , the formulation of a second law of thermodynamics seems at first sight problematic .
indeed , it is usually taken for granted that fine - grained entropy has to be conserved under the microscopic dynamics imposed by schrdinger s equation , and that thermalization may only be read from a growth in a coarse - grained entropy , such as in boltzmann s @xmath7-theorem . in this work ,
we propose a very simple and practical resolution of this issue , based on the possibility of creating entanglement without exchanging energy ( cf .
@xcite for alternative outlooks on this problem ) . for clarity
, we will focus on a single example , prototype of all irreversible transformations , that is the joule - gay - lussac expansion .
the solution suggested here is nonetheless much more general , and is thought to be relevant for all ordinary thermodynamic systems .
+ the celebrated experiment , initially studied by gay - lussac and used later by joule , has played a central role in the history of thermodynamics .
it consists in the adiabatic free expansion of a gas , initially kept in one side of a thermally isolated container while the other side is empty ( see fig .
[ joule - gay - lussac - exp ] ) .
when the tap separating the two flasks is opened , the gas starts spreading out until homogeneity is achieved .
if the internal energy functional does not depend on the volume , then the initial and final temperatures are found to be equal .
the treatment of the joule - gay - lussac expansion for an ideal gas can be found in all textbooks of thermodynamics and is as follows : there is no exchange of heat nor work between the gas and the outside , and , while the accessible volume is doubled , the entropy of the gas , and therefore of the whole universe , increases by @xmath8 indicating the irreversibility of the process . on the other hand , it is also instructive to have a mechanical description of the joule - gay - lussac expansion .
assuming for simplicity a monoatomic ideal gas , the dynamics of the @xmath9 particles is governed by the hamiltonian @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the potential keeping the particles inside the whole container .
liouville s theorem then ensures the conservation of the volume - form induced by the symplectic structure , that is to say , there can be no loss of information whatsoever at the microscopic scale . shifting to quantum mechanics ,
the evolution is given by the unitary operator @xmath12 where @xmath13 is simply obtained by canonical quantization of the classical hamiltonian .
assuming thermal equilibrium , the initial state for the gas reads @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the potential constraining the particles in one flask only , and @xmath16 is the inverse temperature at which the gas has been prepared .
while the von neumann entropy of the gas initially matches with the thermodynamic one , it is inevitably preserved under the unitary evolution , namely @xmath17 the tension between the irreversible macroscopic thermodynamics and the reversible microscopic mechanics is manifest .
our proposal is that an increase of von neumann entropy is actually allowed by a more careful analysis of what a thermally isolated system is .
+ consider a classical particle arriving with a momentum @xmath18 perpendicularly to a wall initially at rest .
assuming an elastic collision , and given the large ratio between the masses of the wall and the particle , one obtains that after the bounce , the particle has a momentum @xmath19 , while the wall has acquired a momentum @xmath20 . the kinetic energy transferred to the wall being negligible
, the energy of the particle is conserved over the bounce with a very good approximation .
consequently , the classical dynamics of the gas is well described by the effective hamiltonian . from the point of view of quantum mechanics ,
the situation is more delicate .
the total energy and momentum are also conserved during a rebound , so that the state for the composite system made of the particle and the wall evolves from @xmath21 to @xmath22 . by linearity , if the particle started in a superposition @xmath23 , then the unitary transformation associated to the bounce reads @xmath24 and , after tracing out the wall s degrees of freedom , the evolution of the state of the particle becomes @xmath25 which is , in general , not unitary .
hence , the bounce is accompanied with a rise of von neumann entropy .
the model presented above is of course very schematic , the physics of the interaction between the gas and the container , and the initial state of the latter , are in fact much more complicated .
however , it already shows that such an interaction must affect their quantum correlations , and can lead to an increase of von neumann entropy for the gas ( see @xcite for a general result ) . in other words , at the quantum level , the energy distribution of the gas is conserved yet the evolution is not unitary , and the naive canonical quantization of does not strictly apply .
it is now possible to derive the final state for the gas from its quantum mechanical description alone .
the space @xmath26 of accessible states is such that the energy distribution for the gas remains unchanged ( for instance , @xmath27 ) . after a transient phase , characterized by a relaxation time @xmath28 , during which the gas and its environment get more entangled ,
the state of the universe @xmath29 can be seen as a generic unit vector in @xmath26 . following the conclusion of typicality
, we find that the gas reaches a new equilibrium state , namely @xmath30 as a consequence , after a long - enough time , the variation of von neumann entropy of the gas matches the increase of entropy expected from thermodynamics .
+ let us now have a quick look at a slightly different experiment : the adiabatic reversible expansion of a gas pushing a piston .
contrary to the joule - gay - lussac expansion , the temperature of the gas is decreasing as work is performed on the piston . during this process
, the space @xmath26 of accessible states is changing , but its dimension remains constant since the size of the container and the thermal de broglie wavelength are increasing in the same way .
later , if the piston is slowly pushed back , the gas reverts to its initial temperature . in this transformation
, reversibility can not be understood as the possibility to return to the initial microstate , which is practically impossible as soon as a few particles are involved , but only as conservation of von neumann entropy . on the contrary ,
when a constraint initially applied to the system is suddenly relaxed , like in joule - gay - lussac s experiment , the space of accessible states is enlarged . the new states , of possibly higher entropy , can only be reached through interaction with the environment .
however , this interaction does not need to involve significant energy transfer , the quantum system remains thermally isolated , and the growth of entanglement is responsible for the irreversibility of its evolution .
+ let us mention that the idea of varying entropy without exchanging energy has recently been suggested as a solution to the information loss paradox in black holes evaporation @xcite .
more precisely , at the very last stage of its life , a black hole is believed to have lost almost all its mass in the form of hawking s radiation , leaving a planckian size object and a matter field in a thermal state , with an entropy proportional to the initial black hole area .
hence , it has been argued that a huge amount of information should be encoded adiabatically into correlations with geometric degrees of freedom , in order to ensure purity of the final quantum state .
+ to summarize , the second law of thermodynamics , characterizing irreversible transformations , is usually considered at a mesoscopic level , by the mean of a coarse - grained entropy , while no information loss nor thermalization is expected to occur for the fundamental degrees of freedom .
on the other hand , the framework of typicality attempts to make use of properties of quantum systems , specifically entanglement , as foundations for equilibrium statistical mechanics .
in particular , it identifies thermodynamic and von neumann entropies . in that context , it is legitimate to raise the issue of thermalization , namely how an isolated system can reach the maximal entropy state .
the observation that , for quantum systems , being thermodynamically isolated is qualitatively very different from being exactly isolated , opens the possibility of nontrivial quantum interactions without significant exchange of energy , and provides a physical ground for the second law at the microscopic scale .
it is worth noting that recent work involving heat baths in squeezed states also points out the role of quantum correlations in thermodynamic processes @xcite .
finally , this approach offers a fresh look at irreversibility .
if the entropy of a system evolving unitarily has to be constant , it is not the case for those of its components .
indeed , the nonextensivity of von neumann entropy allows for subsystems to see their entropy growing , due to a stronger entanglement between them , without any contradiction with the conservation of total information .
that might be of relevance for explaining the arrow of time in cosmology : any region of space is constantly interacting with new degrees of freedom entering its past light cone , and , assuming a separable initial state , new quantum correlations can be established . this viewpoint may help us to understand the emergence , locally , of classical mixtures rather than highly - quantum states , and the increase of entropy for the observable universe . | we are grateful to goffredo chirco , tommaso de lorenzo , alejandro perez , and carlo rovelli , for interesting discussions and useful comments . | grateful goffredo tommaso lorenzo alejandro perez carlo rovelli discussions comments | 0.064777 | 37 | 22 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,486 | for the recent four years we have been studying feedback heating in cooling flow ( cf ) clusters by agn activity that inflate bubbles by jets ; this short contribution to a meeting summarizes our main results . to achieve our results we had to self - consistently inflate the bubbles with jets , rather than inject them artificially .
our main results are as follows ( 1 ) feedback mechanisms that are based on bondi accretion fail . instead , the accretion to the central super - massive black hole ( smbh ) is in the form of cold dense blobs that fall - in from an extended region .
( 2 ) slow massive wide ( smw ) jets , or rapidly precessing jets , can inflate bubbles similar to those observed in cf clusters .
( 3 ) contrary to some claims in the literature , the inflated bubbles are stable for a relatively long time , becoming unstable only at later times .
( 4 ) a single bubble inflation episode excites multiple sound waves and shocks .
these can then heat the intracluster medium ( icm ) .
( 5 ) mixing of the bubble material to the icm is efficient , and can serve as a main heating channel .
( 6 ) the heating processes work in all directions , and can explain the heating of the icm in cf in clusters and in galaxies . address = dept . of physics , technion , haifa 32000 israel
; soker@physics.technion.ac.il address = dept . of physics , technion , haifa 32000
israel address = osservatorio astronomico di brera , via brera 28 , 20121 milano | * ( 1 ) the failure of the bondi accretion feedback * in several papers and talks we showed that the bondi accretion fails to explain feedback heating in cooling flows ( cfs ) in clusters of galaxies ( soker 2006 ) . for more arguments
the reader should consult that paper .
here we only point to the two main reasons for the failure of a feedback heating based on the bondi accretion . _
( i ) there is no time for the feedback to work .
_ in the bondi accretion process the inflow velocity at the bondi radius @xmath0 is about the sound speed @xmath1 , with typical values for cf clusters . from mass conservation
the inflow velocity varies as @xmath2 ( because the icm density profile is flat in the inner regions of clusters ) , and its typical value at @xmath3 is @xmath4 .
the time it takes for the gas to flow inward from a distance of @xmath5 and feed the smbh is @xmath6 this time is longer than the cooling time of most cf clusters at @xmath3 .
the situation at @xmath7 is hopeless , as the inflow time is more than the age of the cluster . _
( ii ) insufficient heating in clusters . _
most supporters of feedback by bondi accretion cite the paper by allen et al .
. however , allen et al .
( 2006 ) , noted that their results can not be extrapolated to cfs in cluster of galaxies .
most likely , the bondi accretion process can not explain the feedback heating in the process of galaxy formation as well .
* ( 2 ) the cold feedback mechanism * in the cold - feedback model ( pizzolato & soker 2005 ; soker 2006 , 2008b ) mass accreted by the central smbh originates in non - linear over - dense blobs of gas residing in an extended region of @xmath8 ; these blobs are originally hot , but then cool faster than their environment and sink toward the center ( see also revaz et al .
the mass accretion rate by the central black hole is determined by the cooling time of the icm , the entropy profile , and the presence of inhomogeneities ( soker 2006 ) .
most important , the icm entropy profile must be shallow for the blobs to reach the center as cold blobs .
wilman et al .
( 2008 ) suggest that the behavior and properties of the cold clumps they observe in the cluster a1664 support the cold feedback mechanism .
the cold feedback mechanism has the following consequences .
cooling flows do exist , but at moderate mass cooling rates .
the _ moderate cooling flow model _ ( soker et al . 2001 ) .
the cold feedback mechanism explains why real clusters depart from an ` ideal ' feedback loop that is 100% efficient in suppressing cooling and star formation .
simply , the feedback requires that non - negligible quantities of mass cool to low temperatures .
part of the mass falls to small radii .
part ( likely most ) of the inflowing cold gas is ejected back from the very inner region .
this is done by the original jets blown by the smbh ( soker 2008a ) .
the ejection of this gas is done in a slow massive wide ( smw ) bipolar outflow , which are actually two jets .
the most striking example of an smw outflow is presented in the seminal work of moe et al .
( 2009 apj submitted ) . by conducting a thorough analysis , moe et al .
( 2009 ) find the outflow from the quasar sdss j0838 + 2955 to have a velocity of @xmath9 , and a mass outflow rate of @xmath10 , assuming a cover fraction of @xmath11 .
the cooling and ejection back of large quantities of mass , make the feedback process not only of energy ( heating ) , but also of mass ( pizzolato & soker 2005 ) . as we showed in a series of five papers
, such smw jets can inflate the ` fat ' bubbles that are observed in many cfs , in clusters , groups of galaxies , and elliptical galaxies .
the implication is that narrow radio jets that are observed in many cases are not the main source of the energy inflating the bubbles .
we elaborate on this in the last section .
the same mechanism that form smw jets in cf clusters and galaxies , can expel large quantities of mass during galaxy formation , and might explain the smbh - bulge mass correlation ( soker 2009 ) .
in a series of five papers we conducted 2.5d hydrodynamical numerical simulations , and for the first time managed to systematically inflate ` fat ' bubbles ( i.e. , large and almost spherical bubbles ) as observed in cf clusters .
main results of these papers are as follows . *
( 1 ) * fat bubbles can be inflated by smw jets ( sternberg et al .
2007 ; sternberg & soker 2008b , 2009a , b ) .
typical values are : initial jet speed@xmath12 ; mass loss rate into the two jets@xmath13 ; a large half opening angle of @xmath14 . *
( 2 ) * rapidly precession narrow jets have the same effect as wide jets ( sternberg & soker 2008a , 2009a ) , and can also explain the formation of ` fat ' bubbles . *
( 3 ) * bubbles are known to be stable during the inflation phase ( pizzolato & soker 2006 ) .
the reason is that the bubble s boundary is decelerated by the denser icm gas , and hence it is actually rayleigh - taylor _ stable _ during the inflation phase .
when we inflate bubbles self - consistently with jets ( as it should be done , and as we did in all our simulations ) , we further find that the bubbles stay intact for a much longer time after the inflation phase ends ( sternberg & soker 2008b )
. basically , the dense shell moving outward ahead of the bubble ( formed during the inflation phase ) and the vortexes formed inside the bubbles , stabilize the bubble .
these effects can not be studied with bubbles that are artificially injected to the icm . * ( 4 ) * every bubble inflation episode excites multiple sound waves and shocks ( sternberg & soker 2009a ) .
such sound waves are observed in some cf clusters , most clearly in perseus ( fabian et al .
( 5 ) * mixing of very - hot bubble material with hot icm gas can be a major channel to heat the icm ( sternberg & soker 2008b , 2009a ; also brggen et al .
( 6 ) * the last two processes are effective not only in the directions of propagation of the jets and bubbles , but also perpendicular to this symmetry axis .
it seems that these processes provide the energy channel from the jets to the icm in all relevant regions .
again , self - consistent inflation of bubbles by jets is required to show that . * ( 7 ) * narrow very fast ( even relativistic ) jets can have negligible energy content and still fill the bubbles with radio radiation .
we elaborate on this preliminary result next .
in many clusters there is an imperfect morphological correlation between radio emission and deficient x - ray bubbles .
examples were given in the talks by fabio gastaldello and simona giacintucci .
more examples are : ( 1 ) in ngc 5044 the radio emission fills only one of three bubbles ( david et al . 2009 ) ; ( 2 ) hercules a does not show x - ray holes coincident with the radio lobes ( gizani & leahy 2004 ; nulsen et al .
2005 ) ; ( 3 ) in abell 2626 no x - ray deficient bubbles are observed at the locations of strong radio emission ( rizza et al .
2000 ; wong et al . 2008 ) .
we are also motivated by that the energy required to inflate bubbles is larger than the energy in radio emission ( e.g. , de young 2006 ) .
we note that weak radio emission at long wavelength can fill the bubbles .
this is expected as old radio jets might have filled the region . here
we are interested in the radio morphology of recently launched jets .
the simulations were performed using the _ virginia hydrodynamics - i _ code ( vh-1 ; blondin et al .
1990 ) , as described in our previous papers .
for the first 100 myr time period of our simulation we used the parameters of model i ( as described in sternberg & soker 2009b ) , at the end of which a fat bubble has been inflated .
all detail are in that paper .
we study a three - dimensional axisymmetric flow with a 2d grid ( referred to as 2.5d ) .
the fast ` radio ' jet was turned on at the same time the smw jet was turned off . while the smw jet was ejected along the symmetry axis ( horizontal axis in the figures ) ,
the fast jet was injected at an angle of @xmath15 to the symmetry axis . in our 2.5d numerical code
, this physically corresponds to a jet that is rapidly rotating around the symmetry axis at an angle of @xmath15 ( see sternberg & soker 2008a ) .
the fast jet has a half opening angle of @xmath16 , an injection velocity of @xmath17 , a mass loss rate per two jet of @xmath18 , and a total power of the two fast jets of @xmath19 , which is equal to the power of the smw jets that inflated the bubbles up to @xmath20myr . in reality
, we would like the fast ( radio ) jets power to decline from about the power of the smw jets to @xmath21 times the power of the smw jets , and be narrow jets with slow precession .
such a jet covers a solid angle of @xmath22 .
however , what matters for the penetration of the jets through the bubble is the momentum flux ( equals to the ram pressure ) . in our 2.5d code one jet
we inject covers a solid angle of @xmath23 . to maintain the desired momentum flux we had to use a power larger by a factor of @xmath24 .
the evolution of the fast ( radio ) jet , as shown in the figures , teaches us about the propagation of the fast jets and the morphology of their shocked gas , but the total volume filled by the shocked fast jet s material is larger than what a more realistic full 3d code will give .
our code does not explicitly separate the material originating in the smw and the fast jets .
we identify the material originating in the fast jet by its high postshock temperature , @xmath25k . in reality , this is where we expect to detect strong radio emission .
we note that the shocked fast jet material is spreading inside a large volume of the bubble .
however , it is not smooth , but has shapes of loops and arcs , as observed in some cases .
namely , there is no one - to - one ( perfect ) correlation between the shocked fast ( ` radio ' ) jet material and the bubble .
the main reason is that it is injected in one direction , and that the internal velocities of the gas inside the already inflated bubbles spreads the shocked fast wind gas around . in other words ,
the internal motion inside the already existing bubble spreads the shocked fast jet material to large distances and to different directions
. this might give the ( wrong ) impression that the bubble was inflated by the fast jet .
the justification for the transition from smw jets to much faster narrow jets can be explained in the following way in the frame of the cold feedback model .
after most of the cold gas was expelled from the vicinity of the smbh in one of the feedback cycles , two changes occur .
first , the accretion rate declines and so is the power of the jets .
second , the fast narrow jets launched by the smbh do not encounter large quantities of dense gas , that otherwise might prevent them from propagating to large distances ( soker 2008a ) .
therefore , instead of smw jets we observe the narrow radio jets . in reality
the transition will be gradual , and both types of jets might coexist .
we propose this as an explanation to many cases where no perfect correlation exist between the morphologies of strong radio emission and x - ray deficient bubbles .
if true , this implies that the observed radio jets are not the main energy source of the bubbles .
a. sternberg & n. soker _ mnras _ * 384 * , 1327 ( 2008a ) a. sternberg & n. soker _ mnras _ * 389 * , l13 ( 2008b ) a. sternberg & n. soker
_ mnras _ * 395 * , 228 ( 2009a ) a. sternberg & n. soker
_ mnras _ * 398 * , 422 - 428 ( 2009b ) r. j. wilman , a. c. edge , & a. m. swinbank _ mnras _ , * 395 * , 1355 - 1370 ( 2009 ) | 1 failure bondi accretion feedback bondi accretion fails explain feedback heating in cooling flows clusters galaxies soker 2006 consult paper two main reasons for failure feedback heating bondi accretion no time for feedback to work bondi inflow velocity at radius @xmath0 about sound speed @xmath1 typical values for cf clusters inflow velocity varies as @xmath2 icm density profile flat typical value at @xmath3 is @xmath4 time for gas to flow inward @xmath5 feed smbh @xmath6 longer than cooling time of most cf clusters at @xmath3 situation at @xmath7 hopeless inflow time more than age cluster insufficient heating in clusters supporters of feedback bondi accretion cite allen et al . results not extrapolated to cfs in galaxies bondi accretion explain feedback heating in galaxy formation 2 ) cold feedback mechanism model mass accreted by central smbh originates in non - linear over - dense blobs of gas in region of @xmath8 blobs originally hot cool faster sink toward center revaz et al mass accretion rate by central black hole determined by cooling time icm entropy profile inhomogeneities soker 2006 ) icm entropy profile must shallow for blobs to reach center as cold blobs wilman et al 2008 suggest behavior cold clumps in cluster a1664 support cold feedback mechanism cooling flows exist at moderate mass cooling rates moderate cooling flow model soker et 2001 explains clusters depart from ideal feedback loop cooling star formation feedback requires quantities mass cool to low temperatures part mass falls to small radii inflowing cold gas ejected from inner region by original jets blown by smbh soker 2008a ejection in slow massive bipolar outflow two jets example smw outflow in moe et al . 2009 outflow from quasar sdss j0838 + 2955 velocity of @xmath9 mass outflow rate of @xmath10 cover fraction of @xmath11 cooling ejection of large quantities mass make feedback process of energy mass ( pizzolato & soker 2005 )showed in five papers smw jets inflate ` fat ' bubbles observed in cfs clusters galaxies elliptical galaxies implication narrow radio jets not main source energy inflating bubbles elaborate in last section mechanism smw jets in clusters galaxies expel large mass during galaxy formation explain smbh - bulge mass correlation ( soker 2009 ) five papers conducted 2.5d hydrodynamical simulations systematically ` fat ' bubbles large spherical bubbles in cf clusters results fat bubbles inflated by smw jets ( sternberg et al 2007 sternberg soker 2008b 2009a typical values initial jet speed mass loss rate large half opening angle @xmath14 rapidly precession narrow jets same effect as wide jets explain formation of ` fat ' bubbles bubbles stable during inflation phase ( pizzolato soker 2006 ) bubble s boundary decelerated by denser icm gas rayleigh - taylor stable during inflation phase inflate bubbles self - consistently with jets bubbles stay intact longer after inflation phase ends ( sternberg & soker 2008b )dense shell moving outward ahead of bubble during inflation phase vortexes inside bubbles stabilize bubble effects not studied with bubbles artificially injected to icm bubble inflation excites sound waves shocks sternberg soker 2009a sound waves observed in some cf clusters in perseus mixing of - hot bubble material with hot icm gas major channel to heat icm sternberg 2008b 2009a last two processes effective in directions propagation jets bubbles perpendicular to symmetry axis provide energy channel from jets to icm in regions self - consistent inflation of bubbles by jets required narrow fast jets can have negligible energy content fill bubbles with radio radiation in imperfect morphological correlation between radio emission and deficient x - ray bubbles examples in fabio gastaldello simona giacintucci in ngc 5044 radio emission fills one of three bubbles hercules a show x - ray holes coincident with radio lobes in abell 2626 no x - ray deficient bubbles observed at strong radio emission rizza 2000 wong 2008motivated by energy inflate bubbles larger than radio emission de young 2006 weak radio emission long wavelength can fill bubbles expected old radio jets might have filled region interested in radio morphology of recently launched jets simulations performed using virginia hydrodynamics - i code blondin 1990 first 100 myr period used parameters of model i sternberg & soker 2009b fat bubble inflated study three - dimensional axisymmetric flow with 2d grid 2.5d ) fast radio jet turned on smw jet turned off smw jet ejected along symmetry axis fast jet injected at angle @xmath15 to symmetry axis 2.5d numerical code corresponds to jet rotating around symmetry axis angle @xmath15 sternberg soker 2008a fast jet has half opening angle @xmath16 injection velocity @xmath17 mass loss rate per @xmath18 total power @xmath19 equal to smw jets inflated to @xmath20myr fast jets power to decline from to @xmath21 times power smw narrow jets with slow precession jet covers solid angle of @xmath22 .matters for penetration jets through bubble is momentum flux ( equals to ram pressure ) in our 2.5d code one jet covers angle of @xmath23 to maintain desired momentum flux power larger by @xmath24 evolution of fast radio ) jet teaches propagation jets morphology of shocked gas total volume by shocked fast jet s material larger than realistic full 3d code code separate material in smw and fast jets identify material fast jet by high postshock temperature , @xmath25k expect detect strong radio emission shocked fast jet material spreading inside large volume bubble not smooth has shapes of loops arcs no one - to - one correlation between shocked fast jet material and bubble injected in one direction internal velocities gas spreads shocked fast gas internal motion spreads shocked fast jet material to large distances different directions might impression bubble inflated by fast jet justification for transition from smw jets to faster narrow jets explained cold feedback model after cold gas expelled from smbh two changes occur accretion rate declines power of jetsfast narrow jets smbh encounter dense gas distances soker 2008a ) instead smw jets observe narrow radio jets transition gradual both jets might coexist propose explanation no correlation between strong radio emission x - ray deficient bubbles implies radio jets not main energy source bubbles sternberg n. soker mnras * 384 *, 1327 ( 2008a ) 389 * l13 ( 2008b ) 395 * 228 ( 2009a ) 398 * 422 - 428 ( 2009b ). j. wilman a. c. edge m. swinbank _ mnras * 395 *, 1355 - 1370 ( 2009 ) | 0.443233 | 2,876 | 1,429 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,492 | using data collected using the cleo iii detector , we present recent results on decays of the @xmath0 resonances .
we report on three analyses .
they are : ( 1 ) improved measurements of the muonic branching fraction of the @xmath0 , ( 2 ) precision measurements of @xmath1 and @xmath2 photonic transitions , and ( 3 ) new measurements of @xmath3 decays to charmonium final states . # 1#2#3 0 ( 1s)_c0+x 1 ( 1s)_c1+x 2 ( 1s)_c2+x f 4s ( 4s ) 4 ( 4s ) | since their discovery in 1977 , the @xmath4 resonances have provided a unique laboratory for the study of strong interactions ( qcd ) , while the @xmath5 resonance provides a clean source of @xmath6 mesons which are used to probe the weak interaction .
the analyses reported on here make use of approximately 20@xmath710@xmath8 @xmath3 , 9@xmath710@xmath8 @xmath1 , and @xmath9 @xmath2 decays recorded using the cleo iii detector at cesr .
the analyses also utilize 0.2 @xmath10 , 0.4 @xmath10 and 0.2 @xmath10 of data taken just below the @xmath3 , @xmath1 , and @xmath2 resonances ( _ ie . , continuum _ ) , respectively .
the @xmath4 resonances have provided a fertile testing ground for both lattice qcd and qcd - inspired potential models . of particular interest
are the total widths of these resonances , @xmath11 , which can be related to the muonic branching fraction , @xmath12 via @xmath13 , where the electronic decay width , @xmath14 , can be obtained from the integrated resonant cross - section for @xmath15 .
@xmath16 also enters into the determination of other @xmath4 branching fraction measurements , and therefore may present a limiting systematic uncertainty .
cleo is now in a position to provide a much improved measurement of @xmath12 @xcite .
the branching fraction @xmath12 can be extracted by measuring the efficiency - corrected ratio : @xmath17 , which is related to @xmath12 through @xmath18 .
dimuon events are selected by requiring exactly two nearly back - to - back charged tracks ( @xmath19 ) with energy @xmath20 in the range @xmath21 , one which must be detected in the muon system .
hadronic events are selected by requiring @xmath22 , with additional requirements on the energy in the calorimeter when @xmath23 .
the number of dimuon ( hadronic ) events surviving all analysis requirements are @xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) , @xmath26 ( @xmath27 ) , and @xmath28 ( @xmath29 ) for @xmath3 , @xmath1 , and @xmath2 , respectively . event selection and analysis requirement efficiencies
are determined from simulation and are 65% ( 96 - 98% ) for the dimuon ( hadronic ) event selection .
backgrounds are estimated using simulation and are below 3% for the dimuon samples and less than 1% for the hadronic samples .
the branching fractions are found to be : @xmath30 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 , where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic .
the @xmath3 measurement is consistent with previous measurements , but the @xmath1 and @xmath2 are larger by 2 - 3 standard deviations .
these latter two measurements provide factor of 2 - 3 improvement in the precision to which these branching fractions are known while the @xmath3 result is by itself competitive with the world average .
measurements of the radiative decays of the @xmath4 resonances provide clues into the nature of the strong force and provides for unique tests of potential models and lattice qcd .
for example , the electric dipole transition rate , @xmath33 can be determined experimentally , and can in turn be used to extract the corresponding matrix element . the matrix elements and the mass splittings
can be used to learn about the contributing spin - orbit and tensor interactions @xcite . the events for this analysis @xcite use the same hadronic event selection as in the @xmath12 analysis .
radiative transitions are observed through their peaks in the inclusive photon energy spectrum .
photon candidates are required to be isolated from all charged particles and have a shower profile consistent with an electromagnetic shower .
the predominant source of background arises from @xmath34 decay .
application of a @xmath35 veto for low energy photons does not improve the signal significance due to accidental combinations where the signal photon and a random photon have an invariant mass near the @xmath35 mass .
consequently , the @xmath35 veto is not applied to the @xmath36 and @xmath37 analyses . on the other hand ,
a @xmath35 veto is applied to the @xmath38 analysis , where the photon energies are much higher and accidental combinatorial losses are much smaller . the inclusive photon spectrum for @xmath1 data is shown in fig . [ fig : y2s_1p ] .
the top figure shows the data ( points ) and overlayed are the fits to the data ( solid line ) and the background contribution ( dashed line ) .
the lower plot shows the background subtracted peaks along with the fit ( solid line ) and the contributions from the individual @xmath39 states ( dashed line ) .
the background is determined using a combination of continuum and @xmath3 data .
the analogous distributions for @xmath2 data are shown in fig .
[ fig : y3s_2p ] . in both cases ,
large signals are observed for each of the transitions .
the yields , efficiencies , branching fractions and photon energies are summarized in table [ tab : upsrad ] .
the branching fraction measurements are by themselves about a factor of two better than the world average values . using the inclusive photon spectrum , we also observe the rare transition , @xmath40 , which is found to have a branching fraction of @xmath41 .
this is the first measurement of this transition rate . [
cols=">,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
one of the longstanding problems in qcd has been to understand the production mechanism for charmonium in a glue - rich environment . to account for the large excess of charmonium observed at the tevtron ,
an additional color - octet mechanism @xcite was proposed whereby a @xmath42 pair is produced in a color - octet state , and then evolves non - perturbatively into a color - singlet .
the matrix element for the latter was determined as to account for the deficit .
it has been suggested that the study of @xmath43 production in three - gluon decays of @xmath4 provides a unique opportunity to test color - octet predictions .
the most dramatic expectation is a peaking of the @xmath43 momentum spectrum near the kinematic endpoint .
a second mechanism which can also produce @xmath43 in @xmath4 decay is the color - singlet process , @xmath44 , which is inherently soft and should yield two additional open charm particles .
events used in this analysis @xcite are required to pass standard hadronic event selection . in order to suppress background from radiative return ( @xmath45 )
, we reject events which have @xmath46 and either a detected photon with momentum greater than 3.75 gev / c , or an event momentum imbalance of larger than 2 gev / c .
candidates @xmath43 s are reconstructed in the @xmath47 and @xmath48 modes .
in addition to standard track selection criteria , muons are required to be detected in the muon system .
electrons are required to deposit energy in the calorimeter which is consistent with its measured momentum .
the invariant mass distributions for @xmath47 and @xmath48 candidates are shown in fig .
[ fig : mass_1s ] . the continuum contribution ( @xmath49 )
is estimated using data taken on and below the @xmath5 .
this contribution is added to the expected @xmath50 contribution , and the total subtracted from the on-@xmath3 data .
the resulting scaled momentum distributions for @xmath47 and @xmath48 in @xmath3 decays are shown in fig .
[ fig : x_spec ] .
the data are compared to predictions of the color - octet ( solid curve ) and color - singlet ( dashed curve ) .
the data are much softer than the color - octet predictions and moderately softer than the color - singlet predictions . in the latter case , the effects of fragmentation of the recoiling charm into @xmath51 , @xmath52 , @xmath53 , @xmath54 , etc
is not taken into account and is expected to further soften the spectrum . integrating the spectrum , we measure a branching fraction @xmath55 .
this measurement is consistent with predictions of both the color - octet and color - singlet models which predict branching fractions of @xmath56 and @xmath57 , respectively .
we have also made a first observation of the decay , @xmath58 ( see fig . [
fig : psi2s ] ) and found evidence for @xmath59 .
the branching fractions are measured relative to @xmath60 , and are found to be : @xmath61 , @xmath62 , @xmath63 , and @xmath64 at 90% confidence level .
the feed - down contributions to @xmath43 are about a factor of two higher than expected .
these measurements have the potential to shed some additional light on the production mechanisms of charmonium in glue - rich environments .
i gratefully acknowledge the effort of the cesr staff in providing us with excellent luminosity and running conditions .
i also thank the national science foundation and the u.s . dept . of energy for their support of this research . | discovery 1977 @xmath4 resonances unique laboratory strong interactions @xmath5 resonance source @xmath6 mesons weak interaction analyses 20@xmath710 9@xmath710 decays recorded cleo iii detector cesr utilize 0.2 @xmath10 0.4 @xmath10 0.2 @xmath10 data below @xmath3 @xmath2 resonances @xmath4 resonances testing ground for lattice qcd qcd - inspired potential models total widths resonances @xmath11 related to muonic branching fraction @xmath12 @xmath13 electronic decay width @xmath14 obtained from resonant cross - section @xmath15 @xmath16 enters @xmath4 branching fraction measurements systematic uncertainty cleo improved measurement @xmath12 branching fraction @xmath12 extracted measuring efficiency - corrected ratio @xmath17 related to @xmath12 @xmath18 dimuon events two back - to - back charged tracks @xmath19 ) with energy @xmath20 range @xmath21 detected muon systemhadronic events selected @xmath22 additional requirements energy calorimeter @xmath23 dimuon events surviving analysis requirements @xmath24 @xmath26 @xmath28 for @xmath3 @xmath1 @xmath2 event selection analysis efficiencies determined from simulation 65% 96 - 98% ) for dimuon hadronic event selection backgrounds estimated below 3% dimuon less than 1% hadronic samples branching fractions @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 first uncertainty statistical second systematic @xmath3 measurement consistent with previous @xmath1 @xmath2 larger 2 - 3 standard deviations measurements provide 2 - 3 improvement precision branching @xmath3 result competitive with world average measurements radiative decays @xmath4 resonances strong force unique tests potential models lattice qcd electric dipole transition rate @xmath33 determined experimentally extract matrix element elements mass splittings learn spin - orbit tensor interactions @xcite same hadronic event selection @xmath12 analysis radiative transitions observed peaks photon energy spectrum photon candidates isolated from charged particles shower profile consistent with electromagnetic showerpredominant source background from @xmath34 decay @xmath35 veto for low energy photons improve signal significance due to accidental combinations signal invariant mass near @xmath35 mass @xmath35 veto not applied to @xmath36 and @xmath37 analyses @xmath35 veto applied to @xmath38 analysis photon energies higher accidental combinatorial losses smaller inclusive photon spectrum for @xmath1 data shown in fig . top figure shows data fits to data background contribution lower plot shows background subtracted peaks fit contributions from @xmath39 states background determined using continuum and @xmath3 data analogous distributions for @xmath2 data shown in fig . large signals observed for transitions yields efficiencies branching fractions photon energies summarized in table branching fraction measurements factor of two better than world average values rare transition @xmath40 branching fraction of @xmath41 first measurement of this transition rate in understand production mechanism for charmonium in glue - rich environmentexcess charmonium at tevtron color - octet mechanism proposed @xmath42 pair produced color - octet state evolves into color - singlet matrix element deficit study @xmath43 production in three - gluon decays @xmath4 color - octet predictions expectation peaking @xmath43 momentum spectrum near kinematic endpoint second mechanism @xmath43 decay color - singlet process @xmath44 soft two open charm particles events pass hadronic event selection radiative return reject events @xmath46 detected photon momentum 3.75 gev / c or event momentum imbalance 2 gev / c candidates @xmath43 reconstructed in @xmath47 @xmath48 modes muons detected muon system electrons deposit energy in calorimeter consistent with measured momentum invariant mass distributions for @xmath47 @xmath48 candidates shown in fig . continuum contribution @xmath49 ) estimated using data @xmath5 added to @xmath50 contribution subtracted from on-@xmath3 data resulting scaled momentum distributions for @xmath47 @xmath48 in @xmath3 decays shown in fig .data compared to predictions color - octet singlet data softer than color - octet moderately softer color - singlet effects fragmentation recoiling charm into @xmath51 not expected to soften spectrum integrating spectrum branching fraction @xmath55 consistent with predictions color - octet - singlet models branching fractions of @xmath56 @xmath57 first observation of decay @xmath58 evidence for @xmath59 branching fractions measured relative to @xmath60 found @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath64 at 90% confidence level feed - down contributions to @xmath43 factor two higher than expected measurements potential to shed light on production mechanisms charmonium in glue - rich environments acknowledge cesr staff excellent luminosity running conditions thank national science foundation u.s . dept . of energy for support research | 0.316295 | 2,041 | 1,046 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,502 | the @xmath0-asymmetry induced by transfinite partitions makes it impossible for jordan curves to have an infinite length . | as we known from the xviii century , @xmath1-partitions ( as we call them nowadays ) of finite line segments are only possible if the successive adjacent parts of the @xmath1-partition are of a decreasing length .
this inevitable restriction induces a huge asymmetry in the very partition .
in fact , whatever be the length of the @xmath1-partitioned line segment and whatever be the @xmath1-partition , all its parts , except a finite number of them , will necessarily lie within an arbitrarily small final segment .
for the sake of illustration , consider an @xmath1-partition of a @xmath2 light years length segment -the assumed diameter of the universe .
whatever be the @xmath1-partition of this enormous line segment all its infinitely many parts , except a finite number of them , will inevitably lie within a final segment inconceivable less than , for instance , planck length ( @xmath3 cm ) . there is no way of performing a more equitable partition if the partition has to be @xmath1-ordered .
thus , @xmath1-partitions are @xmath1-asymmetrical .
for the same reason it is impossible to consider two proper points in the real line @xmath4 separated by an infinite euclidean distance , in spite of the assumed infiniteness of the real line .
the above simply unaesthetic consequences of @xmath1-partitions become a little more controversial if the partitioned object is a closed line as a jordan curve .
the objective of the following short discussion is just to examine one of those consequences .
the @xmath1-order makes it impossible a more equitable distribution of the available space . ]
let @xmath5 be a real valued function whose graph is a jordan curve @xmath6 in the euclidean plane @xmath7 .
if @xmath8 and @xmath9 are any two @xmath6 s points , we will write @xmath10 to denote the length of the @xmath6 s arc @xmath11 whose endpoints are @xmath8 and @xmath9 .
that is to say : + assume that @xmath6 has an infinite euclidean length .
in these conditions let @xmath13 be any proper real number greater than 0 and assume @xmath6 is partitioned clockwise from a point @xmath14 into a certain number of adjacent parts @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 @xmath18 so that each part @xmath19 has a finite length which is equal or greater than @xmath13 : + evidently these partition @xmath21 must be infinite otherwise , and being finite the length of the parts , @xmath6 would have a finite length .
in addition , and according to cantor @xcite , @xmath21 can not be uncountably infinite .
in fact , consider the sequence of real numbers @xmath22 defined as : + the one to one correspondence @xmath24 between @xmath25 and @xmath22 defined by @xmath26 proves that both sequence have the same cardinality .
so if the first one were uncountably infinite so would be the second .
but @xmath22 can not be uncountably infinite because if that were the case we could pick a different rational number @xmath27 in each real interval @xmath28 and then we would have an uncountable set of different rational numbers , which is obviously impossible @xcite .
the partition @xmath29 must therefore be countably infinite .
on the other hand , the adjacency of @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 @xmath18 implies successiveness and then ordinality . accordingly @xmath29 must have a certain ordinal number , and taking into account its countable nature
, this ordinal can only be transfinite , i.e. an ordinal of the second class according to cantor s classic terminology @xcite .
now consider a point @xmath30 anticlockwise from @xmath14 and such that @xmath31 . according to ( [ eqn : fjc > = r ] ) @xmath30
can only belong to the last element of @xmath29 .
consequently this sequence must have a last element and then must be @xmath32-ordered , being @xmath33 a transfinite ordinal of the second class second kind , and @xmath34 a finite ordinal ; so that @xmath35 is an ordinal of the second class first kind .
if must therefore exist an @xmath33-th second class second kind ordinal in @xmath29 so that @xmath36 can not have an immediate predecessor ( @xmath37 is the limit of a sequence of first kind ordinals ) .
now then , according again to ( [ eqn : fjc > = r ] ) , the point @xmath38 anticlockwise from @xmath37 and such that @xmath39 can only belong to a part immediately preceding @xmath40 , which is impossible if @xmath37 is of the second kind , as it has to be .
this proves that @xmath29 must be , but can not be , @xmath32-ordered , a contradiction we have derived from our initial assumption on @xmath6 infiniteness .
we must therefore conclude that jordan curves of infinite length are inconsistent objects , and so must be any metrical space compatible with them .
in addition , if @xmath6 is finite the above condition ( [ eqn : fjc > = r ] ) can no longer holds , otherwise @xmath6 would have an infinite length .
therefore , transfinite partitions of jordan curves can only be of a decreasing part - length , i.e. @xmath0-asymmetrical . | known from xviii century @xmath1-partitions of finite line segments possible if adjacent parts decreasing length restriction induces asymmetry in partition length of @xmath1-partitioned line segment all parts except finite number within small final segment consider @xmath1-partition of @xmath2 light years length segment assumed diameter universe many parts except finite number within final segment less than planck length ( @xmath3 cm ) equitable partition if @xmath1-ordered @xmath1-partitions are @xmath1-asymmetrical impossible to consider two points in real line @xmath4 separated by infinite euclidean distance unaesthetic consequences of @xmath1-partitions controversial if partitioned object is closed line as jordan curve examine @xmath1-order makes impossible equitable distribution of available space let @xmath5 be real valued function graph is jordan curve @xmath6 in euclidean plane @xmath7 if @xmath8 and @xmath9 are @xmath6 s points write @xmath10 to length of @xmath6 s arc @xmath11 whose endpoints are @xmath8 and @xmath9 assume @xmath6 has infinite euclidean length let @xmath13 be number greater than 0 assume @xmath6 partitioned clockwise from @xmath14 into adjacent parts @xmath15 each part @xmath19 has finite length equal or greater than @xmath13 partition @xmath21 must be infinite finite length @xmath6 finite length @xmath21 not be uncountably infinite consider sequence of numbers @xmath22 one to one correspondence between @xmath25 and @xmath22 proves same cardinality if first one uncountably infinite so be second @xmath22 can not be uncountably infinite could pick different rational number @xmath27 in each interval uncountable set different rational numbers impossible partition @xmath29 must be countably infinite adjacency of @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 implies successiveness ordinality @xmath29 must have certain ordinal number ordinal can only be transfinite ordinal of second class consider point @xmath30 anticlockwise from @xmath14 @xmath30 can only belong to last element of @xmath29sequence must have last element @xmath32-ordered @xmath33 transfinite ordinal second class second kind @xmath34 finite ordinal @xmath35 is ordinal second class first kind @xmath33-th second class second kind ordinal in @xmath29 @xmath36 immediate predecessor @xmath37 limit sequence first kind ordinals fjc > point @xmath38 anticlockwise from @xmath37 @xmath39 belong to part preceding @xmath40 impossible if @xmath37 second kind @xmath29 must be @xmath32-ordered contradiction from initial assumption @xmath6 infiniteness jordan curves infinite length inconsistent objects metrical space compatible if @xmath6 finite condition eqn : fjc > = r ] no holds @xmath6 infinite length transfinite partitions of jordan curves decreasing part - length @xmath0-asymmetrical | 0.185556 | 1,228 | 649 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,503 | * abstract*. a comparative study on as cast and annealed rare earth bulk metallic glass ( bmg ) with composition tb@xmath0sm@xmath1al@xmath2co@xmath1 has been carried out by magnetization measurements .
the as cast amorphous sample shows non - ergodic magnetization but does not show the behavior expected from magnetic glass .
after annealing , the partially crystallized bmg shows this magnetic glass behavior .
this is confirmed by the established measurement protocol of cooling and heating in unequal fields ( chuf ) . | structural glasses are disordered materials which lack crystalline periodicity and are mechanically solids .
most metals crystallize on cooling , arranging their atoms into a regular pattern called lattice , but if crystallization does not occur and the atoms settle in a random arrangement , the final form is a metallic glass@xcite .
the critical cooling rate is much slower for bmg s , enabling metglass samples of larger dimensions@xcite . a similar kind of arrested kinetics of the first order magnetic transition from ferromagnetic ( fm ) to antiferromagnetic ( afm ) or vice versa has been observed in half doped manganites and in various intermetallic alloys like doped cefe@xmath3 , co doped mn@xmath3sb , ferh and ferromagnetic shape memory alloys in recent years .
these materials have been examined thoroughly by various protocols including the novel protocol chuf conceived and developed to identify the magnetic glasses and its low temperature equilibrium state @xcite .
the commonality between the structural and magnetic glass is the arrested kinetics resulting in the persistence of high temperature state as the metastable state at low temperature . in this manuscript , we highlight on the possibility of a rare - earth bulk metallic glass with composition tb@xmath0sm@xmath1al@xmath2co@xmath1 to be a magnetic glass . we have compared the magnetization behavior of as cast and annealed specimen in order to find the correlation between structural glass and magnetic glass .
the as cast bmg - tb@xmath0sm@xmath1al@xmath2co@xmath1 sample is prepared by arc melting the pure elements in an argon atmosphere and then suck - cast into a cu mold to get a cylindrical rod of 2 mm diameter .
a small piece of this sample was crystallized by annealing at 450@xmath4c .
the amorphous and crystalline nature of the sample is confirmed by x - ray diffraction using bruker ( d8 advance ) x - ray diffractometer with cu k@xmath5 radiations .
magnetization measurements were carried out using a commercial 14t - vsm ppms .
the reported glass transition temperature ( t@xmath6 ) , crystallization temperature ( t@xmath7 ) , and the melting temperature ( t@xmath8 ) of the bmg tb@xmath0sm@xmath1al@xmath2co@xmath1 is 309@xmath4c , 383@xmath4c and 659@xmath4c respectively @xcite .
bmgs are partially crystallized by isothermal annealing at a temperature in the supercooled liquid region or by fast annealing just above crystallization temperature @xcite .
this is known as partial devitrification of bmgs which gives rise to the formation of composites or multi - phases .
the magnetic behavior is complex especially in re based bmgs when multiphases are present after tailoring them by different heat treatments . in order to understand whether the inhomogeneous structure arising from multi - phases can hinder the critical dynamics ,
we have performed the zero field cooled ( zfc ) and field cooled magnetization ( fc ) measurements at various fields on as cast as well as annealed sample .
sm@xmath1al@xmath2co@xmath1 . ] figure 1(a ) shows zfc and fc behavior of the m(t ) measurements at 0.5 t , 1 t and 2 t on as cast sample .
the bifurcation between the zfc and fc curves is an indication of non - ergodicity .
this temperature where the bifurcation between two curves begin , decreases with increase in magnetic field suggesting the irreversibility process begins at lower temperature as field rises .
the difference in zfc and fc magnetization at low temperature is defined as the thermomagnetic irreversibility ( @xmath9 m = @xmath10 ) which increases upto 1 t and then decreases thereafter at 2 t for as cast sample as shown in the inset of figure1(a ) .
similar type of non - ergodic behavior and @xmath9 m has been observed in spin glasses .
figure 1(b ) shows the zfc and fc magnetization behavior of the crystalline counter part at 0.5 , 1 and 2 t which shows an antiferromagnetic transition ( t@xmath11 ) at @xmath12 30k and it decreases to 29k at 2 t .
this fm - afm transition is not seen in the as cast sample .
inset of figure 1(b ) shows the thermo - magnetic irreversibility behavior which increases with field in contrary to the as cast sample .
@xmath9 m rising with field has been observed in magnetic glasses mentioned above . to validate the kinetically arrested state in the crystalline counter part we have performed the well known protocol chuf on as cast as well as on the partially crystallized sample as shown in figure 2 .
figure 2 ( a and b ) shows the temperature dependent magnetization at 1 t and 2 t after cooling in various fields on the as cast sample .
magnetization measurements at 1 t after cooling in 0 , 0.5,1 , 2 , 3 , and 10 t demonstrates the non - ergodic behavior of as cast sample below 14k , which reduces to 13k on increasing the warming field to 2 t . on the other hand m(t )
behavior on annealed sample shows two transitions when cooling field ( h@xmath11 ) is higher than the warming field ( h@xmath13 ) while only one transition when h@xmath14 as shown in figure 2(c and d ) .
the sudden fall in magnetization at low temperatures for h@xmath15 signifies the devitrification of the magnetic glassy state and we note that for h@xmath15 we have non - ergodic behavior below @xmath16 15k where as for h@xmath17 , it is observed at a higher temperature at @xmath16 20k . [ ! h ] sm@xmath1al@xmath2co@xmath1 . ] hence , our measurements show that the as cast amorphous bmg sample does not become a magnetic glass whereas the annealed ( partially crystallized ) sample resembles a magnetic glass
a. l. greer , science * 267 * , 1947 ( 1995 ) . | structural glasses are disordered materials lack crystalline periodicity mechanically solids metals crystallize on cooling atoms into pattern lattice if crystallization atoms settle random final form is metallic glass critical cooling rate slower for bmg s larger dimensions similar arrested kinetics transition from to antiferromagnetic observed in half doped manganites intermetallic alloys like doped cefe ferromagnetic shape memory alloys materials examined by protocols including novel protocol chuf magnetic glasses low temperature equilibrium state commonality between structural magnetic glass arrested kinetics persistence of high temperature state state at low temperature possibility of rare - earth bulk metallic glass with composition tb magnetic glass compared magnetization behavior of as cast annealed specimen correlation between structural glass magnetic glass as cast sample prepared by melting elements in argon atmosphere suck - cast into cu mold cylindrical rod of 2 mm diameter small piece crystallized by annealing at 450@xmath4c amorphous crystalline nature sample confirmed by x - ray diffractionmagnetization measurements using commercial 14t - vsm ppms reported glass transition crystallization melting temperature of bmg 309 383 659@xmath4c @xcite bmgs partially crystallized by isothermal annealing supercooled liquid or fast annealing above crystallization temperature @xcite partial devitrification of bmgs formation of composites multi - phases magnetic behavior complex in based bmgs when multiphases present after heat treatments understand inhomogeneous structure from multi - phases critical dynamics performed zero field cooled field cooled magnetization fc measurements at various fields cast annealed sample figure 1(a ) shows zfc fc behavior measurements at 0.5 t 1 t 2 t cast sample bifurcation between zfc fc curves non - ergodicity decreases with magnetic field irreversibility begins difference in zfc fc magnetization at low temperature thermomagnetic irreversibility ( = @xmath10 ) increases upto 1 t decreases at 2 t for sample similar non - ergodic behavior observed in spin glassesfigure 1(b ) shows zfc fc magnetization crystalline counter part at 0.5 1 2 t antiferromagnetic transition at @xmath12 30k decreases to 29k at 2 t transition not seen in as cast sample thermo - magnetic irreversibility increases with field @xmath9 m rising with field observed in magnetic glasses kinetically arrested state performed protocol chuf on as cast partially crystallized sample figure 2 shows temperature dependent magnetization at 1 t 2 t after cooling magnetization measurements at 1 t after cooling 0.5 2 3 10 t non - ergodic behavior below 14k reduces to 13k on warming field to 2 t m(t behavior annealed sample shows two transitions when cooling field higher than warming one transition when h@xmath14 figure 2(c sudden fall in magnetization at low temperatures h@xmath15 devitrification magnetic glassy state non - ergodic behavior below @xmath16 15k observed higher temperature @xmath16 20k measurements show as cast amorphous bmg sample magnetic glass annealed sample resembles magnetic glass greer science 267 1947 | 0.186832 | 1,371 | 646 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,520 | fits of the @xmath0 covariant @xmath1 baryon chiral perturbation theory to lattice qcd nucleon mass data from several collaborations for 2 and 2 + 1 flavors are presented .
we consider contributions from explicit @xmath2 degrees of freedom , finite volume and finite spacing corrections .
we emphasize here on our @xmath3 study .
we obtain low - energy constants of natural size that are compatible with the rather linear pion - mass dependence of the nucleon mass observed in lattice qcd .
we report a value of @xmath4 mev in the 2 flavor case and @xmath5 mev for 2 + 1 flavors . | through lattice qcd simulations ( lqcd ) it is possible to study qcd at current quark masses which are not restricted to their physical values .
data points obtained for such a scenario represent a powerful pool of information to fix free low - energy constants ( lecs ) of the ( baryon ) chiral perturbation theory ( b@xmath6pt ) ; lecs that also enter calculations for experimental observables .
thus , adjusting the b@xmath6pt to lqcd data in the unphysical region allows for predictions at the physical point .
in our study we performed such a matching for the quark - mass ( @xmath7 ) dependence of the nucleon mass @xmath8 .
we fit lqcd data for the @xmath9 flavors , two light degenerated quarks , as well as for the @xmath10 ensembles , two light degenerated and one heavy quarks . here , we concentrate on our @xmath3 results and refer to ref .
@xcite for more details on the @xmath9 ones . a measure of the contribution from the explicit chiral symmetry breaking to the nucleon mass is given by the so - called @xmath11-term .
it is the nucleon scalar form factor at zero momentum transfer squared which can be isolated from @xmath12-scattering experiments .
alternatively , the @xmath11 can also be obtained by the hellmann - feynman theorem from @xmath8 : @xmath13 as a result , the function @xmath8 , which has mainly unphysical values , connects lqcd , b@xmath6pt and experiment .
the b@xmath6pt up to @xmath0 describes the nucleon mass by : @xmath14 with @xmath15 and @xmath16 as the pion mass and pion decay constant .
we fit the three lecs @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 to lqcd data and obtain through eq .
( [ eq : hf ] ) a @xmath11 value .
explicit @xmath20 contributions can appear in the loop - contributions @xmath21 and we refer to ref .
@xcite for all technical details .
generally , lqcd data is given in the dimensionless form @xmath22 where each collaboration sets its scale through a specific value for the lattice spacing @xmath23 . in the @xmath3 case
, we fit the data after converting to physical units .
since all three quantities are subject to statistical uncertainties , the @xmath23 uncertainty translates into a correlated uncertainty for the normalization of data points belonging to the same set .
we take this correlation into account by defining a correlation matrix @xmath24 containing all these uncertainties , and minimize the function : @xmath25 with @xmath26 being the data and @xmath27 and @xmath28 the b@xmath6pt infinite volume nucleon mass and its finite volume corrections .
the constants @xmath29 parametrize finite spacings effects for each lqcd - action separately in our @xmath1 b@xmath6pt analysis we only include @xmath3 lqcd data for which the strange quark mass is kept constant approximately at its phenomenological value .
for this case the strange quark mass corrections to the nucleon mass can be seen as being integrated out into the lecs we are fitting .
furthermore , to ensure controllable finite volume corrections and a reasonable chiral convergence of our results , we only account for data points with @xmath30 and @xmath31 mev , with @xmath32 being the lattice box size . following this , we include data from the bmw @xcite , hsc @xcite , lhpc @xcite , milc @xcite , nplqcd @xcite , pacs @xcite and rbcuk - qcd @xcite collaborations .
fits . right : the blue - solid ( green - dashed ) line shows our result for the @xmath33 b@xmath6pt fit with(out ) @xmath20 contributions by excluding the two data points from the hsc and nplqcd collaborations . the red - dotted line is a b@xmath6pt fit with @xmath20
including also this data .
left : same results depicted for a smaller @xmath34 range.,title="fig:",width=245 ] fits .
right : the blue - solid ( green - dashed ) line shows our result for the @xmath33 b@xmath6pt fit with(out ) @xmath20 contributions by excluding the two data points from the hsc and nplqcd collaborations . the red - dotted line is a b@xmath6pt fit with @xmath20 including also this data .
left : same results depicted for a smaller @xmath34 range.,title="fig:",width=245 ] the fig .
[ fig-1 ] shows several b@xmath6pt fit strategies to the above listed @xmath3 lqcd data .
we obtain consistent descriptions of the pion - mass dependence of the nucleon mass where the slope - variations are below the resolution of the current data . however , by looking to the pion - mass dependence of the @xmath11 term , left graph of fig .
[ fig-2 ] , we observe that these small variations translate into noticeable changes . for successively including explicit @xmath20 contributions and finite spacing corrections in our fit formula , the @xmath11 term at the physical point changes by up to @xmath35 mev from @xmath36 mev to @xmath37mev down to @xmath38 mev
in view of this , we take a conservative standpoint and give the following weighted average as our final @xmath3 @xmath11 value at the physical point : @xmath39 where the second ( systematical ) uncertainty spans all the above central values . the right graph of fig .
[ fig-2 ] compares our b@xmath6pt results from separate fits to lqcd data from @xmath9 and @xmath3 ensembles . also here , differences are within the spread and uncertainties of the input data but result in a slightly smaller @xmath11 value for the @xmath40 case : @xmath41 concerning the uncertainties , these two values are compatible , however , show a slight tension which we mostly trace back to the different data point distributions . on the one hand
, the current @xmath9 data does not constrain the low-@xmath34 region as much as the @xmath3 data .
this region is dominated by the lec @xmath17 which is the @xmath11 at leading order .
consequently , we obtain by @xmath42 % different @xmath17-values with correspondingly different contributions to the total @xmath11 . on the other hand , in the @xmath9 case one direct data point @xcite of the @xmath11 at @xmath43 mev
could be included in the fit .
a positive outcome was that the above spread of our results with and without inclusion of @xmath20 contributions is lifted .
since no such data point at low-@xmath34 is available for the @xmath3 case , a spread of @xmath44 mev remains .
note that in the hb@xmath6pt formalism @xcite this spread is more than @xmath45 mev . to compare our above numbers also with phenomenology
, we cite the latest value extracted from pure @xmath46-n scattering data : @xmath47 mev @xcite . in conclusion
, we performed fits of the @xmath0 @xmath1 covariant b@xmath6pt with and without explicit @xmath20 contributions to lqcd nucleon mass data . even though the present data set is extensive , we spotted systematic effects coming mainly from the distribution of the data points .
these systematic effects would further be reduced by new data for : a ) more @xmath9 data points in the low-@xmath34 region , b ) already one direct calculation of the @xmath11 at @xmath48 mev for the @xmath49 case .
term from @xmath3 fits .
the color code is the same as in fig .
[ fig-1 ] .
the red - diamond is our predicted @xmath11 value at the physical point .
right : comparison of b@xmath6pt @xmath0 fits with @xmath20 to @xmath9 ( red - triangles ) and @xmath3 ( blue - squares ) lqcd data .
the blue - circle is the physical nucleon mass.,title="fig:",width=245 ] term from @xmath3 fits . the color code is the same as in fig .
[ fig-1 ] .
the red - diamond is our predicted @xmath11 value at the physical point .
right : comparison of b@xmath6pt @xmath0 fits with @xmath20 to @xmath9 ( red - triangles ) and @xmath3 ( blue - squares ) lqcd data .
the blue - circle is the physical nucleon mass.,title="fig:",width=245 ]
the work has been supported by the spanish ministerio de economa y competitividad and european feder funds under contracts fis2011 - 28853-c02 - 01 and fis2011 - 28853-c02 - 02 , generalitat valenciana under contract prometeo/2009/0090 and the eu hadron - physics3 project , grant no .
jmc also acknowledges support from the science technology and facilities council ( stfc ) under grant st / j000477/1 , the grants fpa2010 - 17806 and fundacin sneca 11871/pi/09 .
0 l. alvarez - ruso , t. ledwig , j. martin - camalich , m.j .
vicente - vacas , _ phys .
d _ * 88 * , 054507 ( 2013 ) .
s. durr et al .
( bmw collaboration ) , _ phys .
d _ * 85 * , 014509 ( 2012 ) .
lin et al .
( hs collaboration ) , _ phys .
d _ * 79 * , 034502 ( 2009 ) .
bratt et al .
( lhpc collaboration ) , _ phys .
d _ * 82 * , 094502 ( 2010 ) .
d. toussaint et al .
( milc collaboration ) , private communication .
beane et al .
( nplqcd collaboration ) , _ phys .
d _ * 84 * , 014507 ( 2011 ) .
s. aoki et al .
( pacs collaboration ) , _ phys .
d _ * 79 * , 034503 ( 2009 ) . c. jung et al .
( rbc and ukqcd collaborations ) , _ pos lattice2012 _ , 164 ( 2012 ) .
bali et al .
( qcdsf collaboration ) , nucl .
b * 866 * , 1 ( 2013 ) .
a. walker - loud , _
pos lattice2008 _ , 005 ( 2008 ) .
alarcon , j. martin camalich , j.a .
oller , _ phys .
d _ * 85 * , 051503 ( 2012 ) . | lattice qcd simulations study qcd at current quark masses not restricted to physical values data points represent information low - energy constants baryon chiral perturbation theory enter calculations for experimental observables adjusting b@xmath6pt to lqcd data unphysical region allows predictions at physical point matching for quark - mass @xmath7 dependence nucleon mass @xmath8 fit lqcd data for @xmath9 flavors light @xmath10 ensembles concentrate on @xmath3 results refer to ref @xcite for details @xmath9 contribution from chiral symmetry breaking to nucleon mass @xmath11-term nucleon scalar form factor at zero momentum transfer squared isolated from @xmath12-scattering experiments @xmath11 obtained by hellmann - feynman theorem from @xmath8 function @xmath8 connects lqcd b@xmath6pt experiment b@xmath6pt describes nucleon mass by @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 pion mass pion decay constant fit lecs @xmath17 to lqcd data obtain @xmath11 value@xmath20 contributions in loop - contributions @xmath21 refer @xcite for technical details lqcd data dimensionless form @xmath22 collaboration sets scale lattice spacing @xmath23 @xmath3 fit data after converting to physical units quantities statistical uncertainties @xmath23 uncertainty translates into correlated uncertainty for normalization data points correlation matrix @xmath24 uncertainties minimize function @xmath25 @xmath26 data @xmath27 @xmath28@xmath6pt infinite volume nucleon mass finite volume corrections constants @xmath29 parametrize finite spacings each lqcd - action analysis include @xmath3 lqcd data strange quark mass constant strange quark mass corrections nucleon mass integrated into lecs controllable finite volume corrections chiral convergence account for data points with @xmath30 @xmath31 mev @xmath32 lattice box size include data from bmw hsc lhpc milc nplqcd pacs rbcuk - qcd collaborationsblue line shows result @xmath33 b@xmath6pt fit @xmath20 contributions excluding two data points hsc nplqcd collaborations red - dotted line b@xmath6pt fit with @xmath20 data results smaller @xmath34 range blue - solid line shows result @xmath33 b@xmath6pt fit @xmath20 excluding two data points hsc nplqcd collaborations red - dotted line b@xmath6pt fit with @xmath20 data same results smaller @xmath34 range shows b@xmath6pt fit strategies to @xmath3 lqcd data consistent descriptions pion - mass dependence nucleon mass slope - variations below resolution current data pion - mass dependence @xmath11 term small variations translate into noticeable changes including @xmath20 contributions finite spacing corrections fit formula @xmath11 term physical point changes by @xmath35 mev from @xmath36 to @xmath38 mev conservative weighted average final @xmath3 @xmath11 value physical point : @xmath39 second uncertainty spans central valuesfig-2 ] compares b@xmath6pt results to lqcd data from @xmath9 @xmath3 ensembles differences within spread uncertainties input data smaller @xmath11 value for @xmath40 case values compatible show slight tension data point distributions current @xmath9 data constrain low-@xmath34 region @xmath3 data region dominated by @xmath17 @xmath11 different @xmath17-values different contributions to total @xmath11 @xmath9 case one data point @xcite @xmath11 at @xmath43 mev included in fit spread results without @xmath20 lifted no data point at low-@xmath34 @xmath3 case spread of @xmath44 mev remains in hb@xmath6pt formalism spread more than @xmath45 mev latest value from @xmath46-n scattering data : @xmath47 mev @xcite performed fits of @xmath0 @xmath1 covariant b@xmath6pt with without @xmath20 contributions to lqcd nucleon mass data systematic effects from distribution data pointssystematic effects reduced by new data more @xmath9 data points low-@xmath34 region direct calculation @xmath11 at @xmath48 mev @xmath49 case term @xmath3 fits color code same fig . red - diamond predicted @xmath11 value physical point comparison b@xmath6pt @xmath0 fits with @xmath20 to @xmath9 @xmath3 blue - circle physical nucleon mass @xmath3 color code same red - diamond predicted @xmath11 value physical point comparison@xmath6pt @xmath0 fits with @xmath20 to @xmath9 blue - circle physical nucleon mass work supported by spanish ministerio de economa competitividad european feder funds contracts fis2011 - 28853-c02 - 01 - 02 generalitat valenciana eu hadron - project grant support from science technology facilities council grant j000477/1 grants fpa2010 - 17806 fundacin sneca 11871/pi/09 l. alvarez - ruso ledwig martin - camalich vicente - vacas 054507 2013 durr et albmw collaboration phys d 85 * 014509 ( 2012 ) lin hs collaboration phys 79 * 034502 ( 2009 ) bratt lhpc collaboration phys 82 * 094502 ( 2010 ) milc collaboration private communication beane nplqcd collaboration 84 * 014507 ( 2011 ) aoki pacs collaboration 79 * 034503 ( 2009 ) jung rbc ukqcd collaborations pos lattice2012 164 ( 2012 ) bali qcdsf collaboration nucl 866 * 2013 ) walker - loud pos lattice2008 005 ( 2008 ) alarcon martin camalich j oller phys . d 85 * 051503 ( 2012 ) | 0.351834 | 2,453 | 1,294 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,526 | in this article we construct a series of new infinite families of strongly regular graphs with the same parameters as the point - graphs of non - singular quadrics in @xmath0 . corresponding author : dr susan barwick , university of adelaide , adelaide 5005 , australia .
phone : + 61 8 8313 3983 , fax : + 61 8 8313 3696 , email : susan.barwick@adelaide.edu.au keywords : strongly regular graphs , projective geometry , quadrics ams codes : 51e20 , 05b25 , 05c62 | a strongly regular graph srg@xmath1 , is a graph with @xmath2 vertices such that each vertex lies on @xmath3 edges ; any two adjacent vertices have exactly @xmath4 common neighbours ; and any two non - adjacent vertices have exactly @xmath5 common neighbours .
we consider the strongly regular graphs constructed from a non - singular quadric @xmath6 in @xmath7 . the _ point - graph _
@xmath8 of @xmath6 has vertices corresponding to the points of @xmath6 .
two vertices in @xmath8 are adjacent if the corresponding points of @xmath6 lie on a line contained in @xmath6 .
it is well known ( see for example @xcite ) that @xmath8 is a strongly regular graph . in this article
we let @xmath9 , and construct from @xmath8 approximately @xmath10 new strongly regular graphs with the same parameters as @xmath8 ( see table [ table3 ] for a precise count ) .
this article proceeds as follows .
section [ background ] contains several preliminary results we need .
section [ sec : const ] describes our construction of a series of infinite families of strongly regular graphs , the proof of the construction is given in section [ sec : pf ] . in section [ sec - cliques ] , we classify and count the maximal cliques in the new graphs . in section
[ sec - new ] we prove that our construction yields new families of strongly regular graphs . finally , in section [
sec : autgp ] , we determine the automorphism group of the new graphs . in previous work , kantor @xcite constructed a strongly regular graph from @xmath8 with the same parameters in the case when @xmath6 contains a spread .
kantor conjects that his graph is not isomorphic to @xmath8 .
we show in section [ sec : kantor ] that the graph constructed by kantor is not isomorphic to any of our new graphs .
abiad and haemers @xcite construct several strongly regular graphs from the symplectic graph over @xmath11 .
the dual of these graphs have the same parameters as the point - graph of a non - singular parabolic quadric , so @xmath12 is even .
it is not known if these graphs are isomorphic to our examples with @xmath12 even .
background in @xcite , godsil and mckay take a graph @xmath13 , and use a vertex partition to construct a new graph @xmath14 that has the same spectrum as @xmath13 .
it is well - known ( see for example @xcite ) that if a graph @xmath14 has the same spectrum as a strongly regular graph @xmath13 , then @xmath14 is also strongly regular with the same parameters as @xmath13 . specialising the godsil - mckay construction to a partition of size two in a strongly regular graph
gives the following result .
gmk 1 .
a _ godsil - mckay partition _ of a graph is a partition of the vertices into two sets @xmath15 satisfying : * the set @xmath16 induces a regular subgraph . *
each vertex in @xmath17 is adjacent to @xmath18 , @xmath19 or @xmath20 vertices in @xmath16 .
2 . _ godsil - mckay construction .
_ let @xmath13 be a strongly regular graph with godsil - mckay partition @xmath15 .
construct the graph @xmath14 with the same points and edges as @xmath13 , except : for each vertex @xmath21 in @xmath17 with @xmath19 neighbours in @xmath16 , delete these @xmath19 edges and join @xmath21 to the other @xmath19 vertices in @xmath16 .
then the graph @xmath14 is strongly regular with the same parameters as @xmath13 .
let @xmath6 be a non - singular quadric in @xmath7 .
the _ projective index _
@xmath22 of @xmath6 is the dimension of the largest subspace contained in @xmath6 .
a @xmath22-space contained in @xmath6 is called a _ generator _ of @xmath6 .
if @xmath23 is even , then a non - singular quadric is called a parabolic quadric , denoted @xmath24 , which has projective index @xmath25 . if @xmath26 is odd , then there are two types of non - singular quadrics : the elliptic quadric denoted @xmath27 has projective index @xmath25 ; and the hyperbolic quadric denoted @xmath28 has projective index @xmath29 .
the points and generators of @xmath6 also form a polar space of rank @xmath30 .
we repeatedly use the following two properties of quadrics and polar spaces , see ( * ? ? ?
* chapter 22 ) for more information on quadrics , and ( * ? ? ?
* section 26.1 ) for more information on polar spaces .
quadric - deg let @xmath6 be a non - singular quadric in @xmath7 and let @xmath31 be a @xmath3-space . if the quadric @xmath32 contains a @xmath33-space , then @xmath32 is either @xmath31 , or one or two @xmath33-spaces .
property - star let @xmath6 be a non - singular quadric in @xmath0 , with projective index @xmath22 .
let @xmath34 be a generator of @xmath6 , and @xmath35 a point of @xmath6 not in @xmath34 .
then there is a unique generator @xmath31 of @xmath6 that contains @xmath35 and meets @xmath34 in a @xmath36-space .
further , the points in @xmath34 which lie on a line of @xmath6 through @xmath35 are exactly the points in @xmath37 .
sec : const | strongly regular graph@xmath1 with @xmath2 vertices each on @xmath3 edges two adjacent vertices have @xmath4 common neighbours non - adjacent vertices @xmath5 common neighbours strongly regular graphs from non - singular quadric @xmath6 in @xmath7 point - graph @xmath8 of @xmath6 has vertices corresponding to points @xmath6 two vertices in @xmath8 adjacent if points on line @xmath6 @xmath8 strongly regular @xmath9 construct from @xmath8 @xmath10 new strongly regular graphs same parameters as @xmath8 table for article proceeds section background preliminary results sec const construction of infinite families strongly regular graphs proof section sec : pf ] - cliques classify count maximal cliques in new graphs sec - new construction yields new families strongly regular graphs autgp determine automorphism group of new graphs kantor @xcite constructed strongly regular graph from @xmath8 same parameters @xmath6 spread kantor graph not isomorphic to @xmath8 graph not isomorphic to new graphsabiad haemers construct regular graphs from graph @xmath11 graphs same parameters as point - graph non - singular parabolic quadric @xmath12 even not known if graphs isomorphic to examples with @xmath12 godsil mckay take graph @xmath13 vertex partition construct new graph @xmath14 same spectrum as @xmath13 if graph @xmath14 same spectrum as regular graph @xmath13 regular parameters godsil - mckay construction to partition size two in regular graph result godsil - mckay partition vertices into two sets set @xmath16 induces regular subgraph each vertex in @xmath17 adjacent to vertices in @xmath16 @xmath13 be regular graph with godsil - mckay partition construct graph @xmath14 with same points edges as @xmath13 each vertex @xmath21 @xmath17 delete edges join @xmath21 to other @xmath19 vertices graph @xmath14 regular same parameters as @xmath13 let @xmath6 be non - singular quadric in @xmath7projective index @xmath22 @xmath6 largest subspace @xmath22-space generator @xmath6 if @xmath23 even non - singular quadric parabolic quadric @xmath24 projective index @xmath25 if @xmath26 odd two types non - singular quadrics elliptic quadric @xmath27 index @xmath25 hyperbolic quadric @xmath28 @xmath29 points generators @xmath6 form polar space @xmath30 properties quadrics polar spaces chapter 22 section 26.1 polar spaces @xmath6 non - singular quadric in @xmath7 @xmath31 @xmath3-space quadric @xmath32 contains @xmath33-space @xmath32 @xmath31 or @xmath33-spaces @xmath6 non - singular quadric in @xmath0 projective index @xmath22 @xmath34 generator @xmath6 @xmath35 point of @xmath6 not unique generator @xmath31 of @xmath6 contains @xmath35 meets @xmath34 in @xmath36-space points in @xmath34 on line @xmath6 through @xmath35 points in @xmath37 | 0.18413 | 1,326 | 700 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,527 | the nemo-3 experiment is located in the modane underground laboratory ( lsm ) and has been taking data since 2003 with seven isotopes .
it is searching for the double beta decay process with two ( @xmath0 ) or zero ( @xmath1 ) neutrinos emitted in the final state .
precision measurements of the half - life of the isotopes due to @xmath0 decay have been performed and new results for @xmath2\cdot10^{19}y$ ] , @xmath3\cdot10^{19}y$ ] and @xmath4 \cdot10^{19}y$ ] are presented here .
measurements of this process are important for reducing the uncertainties on the nuclear matrix elements .
no evidence for @xmath1 decay has been found and a 90% confidence level lower limit on the half - life of this process is derived . from this an upper limit can be set on the effective majorana neutrino mass using the most recent nuclear matrix elements ( nme ) calculations . | the objective of the nemo 3 experiment is to search for the double beta decay process with two ( @xmath0 decay ) or zero ( @xmath1 decay ) neutrinos in the final state in the seven different @xmath5 isotopes listed in table [ tab : t12 ] .
the experimental search for @xmath1 decay is of major importance in particle physics .
if this process is observed then it will reveal the majorana nature of the neutrino ( @xmath6 ) and may allow an access to the absolute neutrino mass scale .
the process @xmath1 decay also violates the principle of lepton number conservation and is , therefore , a direct probe for physics beyond the standard model . in the case of the neutrino - mass mechanism
the @xmath1 decay rate can be written as @xmath7^{-1 } = \langle m_{\nu}\rangle^2 \cdot |m^{0\nu}(a , z)|^2 \cdot g^{0\nu}(q_{\beta\beta},z ) , \label{eq : nme}\ ] ] where @xmath8 is the effective neutrino mass , @xmath9 is the nuclear matrix element ( nme ) , and @xmath10 is the kinematical factor proportional to the transition energy to the fifth power , @xmath11 . the @xmath0 decay process is a rare second order weak interaction process .
the accurate measurement of its rate of decay is important since it constitutes the ultimate background in the search for @xmath1 decay signal and is a valuable input for the theoretical calculations of the nme .
the detector @xcite is located in the lsm in the frejus tunnel at the depth of 4800 m w.e .
it is cylindrical with thin source foils ( @xmath12 ) situated in the middle of the tracking volume surrounded by the calorimeter .
the source foils are composed of almost 10 kg of enriched @xmath5 isotopes , listed in table [ tab : t12 ] .
observation of the @xmath5 decay is accomplished by fully reconstructing the tracks of the two electrons and measuring their energy .
a tracking chamber containing 6180 open drift cells , operating in the geiger mode , provides a vertex resolution of about 1 cm and a 25 g magnetic field is used to curve the tracks for charge identification .
a calorimeter consisting of 1940 plastic scintillator blocks with photomultiplier readout gives an energy resolution of 14 17%/@xmath13 fwhm .
a time resolution of 250ps allows excellent suppression of the external background due to electrons crossing the detector .
the detector is capable of identifying e@xmath14 , e@xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 particles and allows good discrimination between signal and background events .
the detector is covered by two layers of shielding against external @xmath16 rays and neutrons .
the @xmath18 events are selected by requiring two reconstructed electron tracks with a curvature corresponding to the negative charge , originating from a common vertex in the source foil .
the energy of each electron measured in the calorimeter should be higher than 200kev .
each track must be incident upon a separate scintillator block and the time difference of the two pmt signals is compared to the estimated time as if the two electrons had originated from a common vertex .
the background can be classified in three groups : external one from incoming @xmath19 , radon inside the tracking volume and internal radioactive contamination of the source .
all three were estimated from the nemo-3 data with events of various topologies .
in particular , radon was measured with e@xmath20 and e@xmath21 events and internal @xmath22bi with e@xmath21 .
the e@xmath20@xmath20 , and e@xmath20@xmath20@xmath20 events are used to measure the @xmath23tl activity requiring the detection of the 2.615 mev @xmath20-ray typical of the @xmath23tl @xmath24 decay .
single electron events are used to measure the foil contamination by @xmath24-emitters .
the external background is measured with the events with the detected incoming @xmath20-ray producing an electron in the source foil .
the external background is checked with two - electron events originating from pure copper and natural tellurium foils .
measurements performed with an hpge detector and radon detectors are used to verify the results .
measurements of the @xmath25 decay half - lives have been performed for the seven isotopes available in nemo-3 and for completeness previous results as well as new results are given in table [ tab : t12 ] .
new preliminary results based on higher statistics than used previously are presented here for the three isotopes , @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
.nemo-3 results of @xmath25 decay half - life measurements for seven isotopes .
[ tab : t12 ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] the measurement of the @xmath27 half - life was performed using the data collected for 925 days .
a total of 678 events was selected , with an expectation of 328 background events .
the largest background contribution is due to the internal @xmath29 contamination of the sample .
the distributions of the sum of the energies of the two electrons and their angular separation are shown in fig .
[ fig : bb_zr96 ] , demonstrating good agreement between the data and the monte carlo simulation .
the @xmath25 efficiency is estimated to be 7.6% .
the measured half - life is @xmath30\cdot10^{19}y$ ] .
zr.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 ] zr.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 ] the measurement of the @xmath26 half - life was performed using the data collected for 943 days .
a total of 133 events was selected , with 17 background events expected .
the two - electron energy sum distribution and single - electron energy spectrum are presented in fig .
[ fig : bb_ca48 ] .
the @xmath31ca sample is known to be contaminated with @xmath32sr ( t@xmath33=28.79y , @xmath34=0.546mev ) .
its daughter @xmath32y ( t@xmath35=3.19h , @xmath36=2.282mev ) is the major background source in this case .
an activity of approximately 1700mbq / kg was measured for @xmath32y using single - electron events .
both @xmath37sr and @xmath32y are essentially pure @xmath38 emitters and imitate @xmath18 events through mller scattering . to suppress this background contribution , events with the energy sum greater than 1.5 mev and @xmath39
are selected .
the @xmath25 efficiency is 3.3% , and the measured half - life is @xmath40\cdot10^{19}y$ ] .
ca.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 ] ca.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 ] the measurement of the @xmath28 half - life was performed using the data collected within 939 days .
a total of 2853 events was selected , with 765 background events expected .
the distributions of the sum of the energies of the two electrons and their angular separation are shown in fig .
[ fig : bb_nd150 ] , demonstrating good agreement between the data and the monte carlo simulation .
the @xmath25 efficiency is estimated to be 7.6% and the half - life is measured to be @xmath41 \cdot10^{19}y$ ] .
nd.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 ] nd.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 ] in the case of the mass mechanism , the @xmath1 decay signal is expected to be a peak in the energy sum distribution at the position of the transition energy @xmath42 ( with a long non - gaussian tail due to energy losses in the source foil ) .
since no excess is observed at the tail of the distribution for @xmath43zr , see fig .
[ fig : bb_zr96 ] ( left ) , nor for @xmath44ca , fig .
[ fig : bb_ca48 ] ( left ) , limits are set on the neutrinoless double beta decay t@xmath45 using the cls method @xcite . a lower half - life limit is translated into an upper limit on the effective majorana neutrino mass @xmath8 ( see eq .
[ eq : nme ] ) .
the following results are obtained using the nme values from @xcite for @xmath43zr and from @xcite for @xmath44ca : t@xmath46 ( 90% c.l . ) , @xmath47 7.4 20.1ev and t@xmath48 ( 90% c.l . ) , @xmath47 29.7ev .
similarly a limit has been set for @xmath8 for @xmath28 .
it is complicated by whether the deformation of the nucleus is taken into account .
the limit has been calculated for both scenarios : t@xmath49 ( 90% c.l . )
with @xmath47 1.7 2.4ev using qrpa model ( no deformation ) @xcite and @xmath47 4.8 7.6ev using so(3 ) model ( with deformation ) @xcite .
all of these limits should be compared with the one set previously by nemo-3 of @xmath47 0.8
1.3ev for @xmath50 @xcite .
no evidence was found for @xmath1 decay and limits on the neutrino mass , @xmath8 , have been set .
new measurements for the half - lives due to @xmath25 decay for the three isotopes , @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 has been presented .
the nemo-3 experiment continues taking data but will eventually be superceded with a new experiment called supernemo .
the baseline design of supernemo envisages using 100 kg of @xmath51 or @xmath28 to reach a sensitivity to the majorana neutrino mass of 0.05 0.1ev . | objective nemo 3 experiment for double beta decay process with two or zero neutrinos in final state in seven @xmath5 isotopes in table t12 search for @xmath1 decay in particle physics if observed majorana nature neutrino @xmath6 ) access absolute neutrino mass scale @xmath1 decay violates lepton number conservation direct probe for physics beyond standard model neutrino - mass @xmath1 decay rate written as @xmath7^{-1 } = ^2 @xmath8 effective neutrino mass @xmath9 nuclear matrix element nme @xmath10 kinematical factor proportional transition energy to fifth power @xmath0 decay process rare second order weak interaction process accurate measurement rate decay important background search for @xmath1 decay signal valuable input for theoretical calculations nme detector @xcite in frejus tunnel depth 4800 m cylindrical with thin source foils ( @xmath12 ) middle tracking volume by calorimeter source foils 10 kg enriched @xmath5 isotopes table tab t12 observation @xmath5 decay reconstructing tracks electrons measuring energy tracking chamber 6180 open drift cells geiger mode vertex resolution 1 cm 25 g magnetic field tracks for charge identification calorimeter 1940 plastic scintillator blocks photomultiplier readout energy resolution 14 17%/@xmath13 fwhm time resolution 250ps suppression external background electrons crossing detector e@xmath14@xmath15 @xmath17 particles discrimination between signal background events two layers shielding against @xmath16 rays neutrons @xmath18 events two reconstructed electron tracks curvature negative charge common vertex source foil energy each electron higher than 200kev each track separate scintillator block time difference pmt signals compared to estimated time background three groups external @xmath19 radon inside tracking volume internal radioactive contamination source three estimated from nemo-3 data topologies radon measured with e@xmath20 e@xmath21 events internal @xmath22bi with e@xmath21e@xmath20 events measure @xmath23tl activity 2.615 mev @xmath20-ray typical @xmath24 decay single electron events measure foil contamination by @xmath24-emitters external background measured with detected incoming @xmath20-ray electron in source foil background checked with two - electron events from pure copper natural tellurium foils measurements with hpge detector radon detectors verify results measurements @xmath25 decay half - lives performed for seven isotopes in nemo-3 previous results new results in table new preliminary results for isotopes @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 results of @xmath25 decay half - life measurements for seven isotopes measurement @xmath27 half - life data 925 days 678 events selected expectation 328 background events largest background contribution to internal @xmath29 contamination distributions of energies two electrons angular separation shown in fig . agreement data carlo simulation @xmath25 efficiency 7.6% measured half - life is @xmath30\cdot10^{19:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 measurement @xmath26 half - life data 943 days 133 events selected 17 background events expected two - electron energy sum distribution single - electron energy spectrum in fig . @xmath31ca sample contaminated with @xmath32sr (=28.79y.546mev ) daughter @xmath32y.19h=2.282mev ) major background source activity 1700mbq / kg measured for @xmath32y single - electron events @xmath37sr @xmath32y pure @xmath38 emitters imitate @xmath18 events suppress events energy sum greater than 1.5 mev @xmath39 selected @xmath25 efficiency 3.3% measured half - life @xmath40\cdot10^{19}y$:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 measurement @xmath28 half - life data 939 days 2853 events selected 765 background events expected distributions energies two electrons angular separation shown in fig . agreement data monte carlo simulation @xmath25 efficiency 7.6% half - life @xmath41 ^{19}y$,title="fig:",scaledwidth=41.0%,height=162 mass mechanism @xmath1 decay signal peak in energy sum distribution at transition energy @xmath42 long non - gaussian tail due to energy losses source foil no excess at tail for @xmath43zr @xmath44ca limits set on neutrinoless double beta decay t@xmath45 using cls method @xcite lower half - life limit translated into upper limit on effective majorana neutrino mass @xmath8 eq results obtained using nme values from @xcite for @xmath43zr @xmath44ca : t@xmath46 90% @xmath47 7.4 20.1ev@xmath48 @xmath47 29.7ev limit set for @xmath8 @xmath28 complicated by deformation nucleus limit calculated for both scenarios t@xmath49 90% @xmath47 1.7 2.4ev @xmath47 4.8 7.6ev limits compared with set nemo-3 of @xmath47 0.8 1.3ev for @xmath50 @xcite no evidence for @xmath1 decay limits on neutrino mass @xmath8 setmeasurements half - lives due @xmath25 decay isotopes @xmath26 presented nemo-3 experiment continues superceded supernemo baseline design supernemo 100 kg @xmath51 or @xmath28 sensitivity majorana neutrino mass 0.05 0.1ev | 0.34857 | 2,309 | 1,197 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,529 | some aspects of the current neutrino oscillation phenomenology are briefly discussed , with emphasis on the status of mass - mixing parameters relevant for scenarios with three active neutrinos @xmath0 , and with an additional fourth sterile neutrino @xmath1 . | at present , the best evidence in favor of @xmath2 oscillations comes from the super - kamiokande ( sk ) atmospheric @xmath2 experiment @xcite , corroborated the macro and soudan2 measurements @xcite .
the sk data , in general , indicate that ( at least ) two mass eigenstates ( say , @xmath3 and @xmath4 ) are nondegenerate @xmath5 , and that @xmath3 is mixed with active flavor states ( @xmath6 ) and , possibly , with a fourth sterile state ( @xmath7 ) , @xmath8 where one has @xmath9 from the data and @xmath10 from unitarity .
i briefly review some mixing scenarios relevant for atmospheric @xmath2 phenomenology , pointing out also their interplay with solar @xmath2 s @xcite and with lsnd @xcite , as well as some outstanding issues .
such scenarios are parametrized in table 1 , where @xmath11 , @xmath12 , and @xmath13 are appropriate neutrino mixing angles @xmath14 , and @xmath15 is the relevant atmospheric @xmath2 squared mass difference ( @xmath16 ) in the various cases ( see @xcite for details on the @xmath17 , @xmath18 , and @xmath19 notation ) . assuming @xmath17 mixing , the present atmospheric data @xcite provide us with two solid bounds , @xmath20 \sin^2\psi & \simeq & 0.50\pm 0.17\ , \\
\end{array}\right.\ ] ] that are not significantly modified @xcite when passing to @xmath18 and @xmath19 scenarios .
( or @xmath21 ) rather than @xmath22 , especially in contexts where physics can be asymmetric in the two octants of a mixing angle @xmath23 @xcite .
] ccccccc + + case & @xmath3&@xmath15&@xmath24 & @xmath25 & @xmath26 & @xmath27 + + @xmath17&@xmath28&@xmath29 & & @xmath30 & @xmath31 & + @xmath18&@xmath32&@xmath33&@xmath34&@xmath35&@xmath36 & + @xmath19&@xmath37&@xmath38 & & @xmath30 & @xmath39 & @xmath40 + + outstanding @xmath17 issues : @xmath41 can the @xmath15 uncertainty be significantly reduced before future long - baseline projects @xcite ?
@xmath42 is @xmath43 mixing exactly maximal @xmath44 or not ?
@xmath45 besides monotonic @xmath46 disappearance , can we also observe one @xmath46 disappearance+appearance cycle @xcite ?
in atmospheric @xmath2 phenomenology , the small squared mass difference @xmath47 is often neglected . in this case , @xmath48 mixing ( see table 1 ) .
detailed analyses of sk data show that the bounds in eq .
( 2 ) are basically preserved for unconstrained @xmath12 @xcite , and that an upper limit can be placed on @xmath49 .
such limit is significantly strengthened by the chooz reactor results : @xmath50 the bounds ( 2)(4 ) are compatible with all typical solutions to the solar @xmath2 problem .
figure 1 presents the current solutions in the @xmath51 mass - mixing plane @xmath52 , at fixed values of @xmath12 @xmath53 .
unfortunately , there is still an embarrassing multiplicity of allowed @xmath54 regions @xcite .
however , such regions typically favor relatively small values of @xmath12 , thus providing a nontrivial , independent consistency check of the bounds ( 3,4 ) in @xmath18 scenarios .
outstanding @xmath18 issues : @xmath41 can sk atmospheric data reveal @xmath55 @xcite ?
@xmath42 if @xmath56 , how far can we push the experimental sensitivity to earth matter effects @xcite and to sign(@xmath57 ) @xcite ?
@xmath45 are there subleading effects ( e.g. , cp violation @xcite ) induced by @xmath58 on atmospheric @xmath2 oscillations ( or , conversely , by @xmath15 on solar @xmath2 oscillations ) ?
@xmath59 can the multiplicity of solar @xmath2 solutions be reduced in the near future @xcite ?
attempts to reconcile all the solar , atmospheric , and lsnd pieces of evidence for oscillations require @xmath19 scenarios with one sterile neutrino @xmath7 , and mass spectra of the kind `` 2 + 2 '' @xcite or `` 1 + 3 '' @xcite . in the 2 + 2 case
, the atmospheric @xmath2 mixing can be approximately described as in the third line of table 1 , involving the usual @xmath60 parameters plus an additional mixing @xmath61 @xcite . for @xmath62 ( @xmath63 ) ,
the atmospheric oscillation channel is purely @xmath64 ( @xmath65 ) ; intermediate values of @xmath61 correspond instead to mixed active+sterile oscillations .
a recent analysis of sk atmospheric results @xcite in the 2 + 2 scenario shows that the bounds in eq .
( 2 ) are not significantly modified , and that there is room for relatively large values of @xmath61 : @xmath66 this result shows that , although sk @xcite ( as well as macro @xcite ) disfavors pure sterile oscillations @xmath67 , one could have sizable sterile mixing besides the standard @xmath68 mixing @xcite . independently , one can study how the usual @xmath54 solar @xmath2 solutions are modified for generic @xmath61 in @xmath19 models @xcite .
it turns out that solar @xmath2 data prefer relatively large values of @xmath61 @xcite .
one can roughly say that , at present , @xmath69 up to variations related to the chosen solution .
therefore , unlike the @xmath18 case , the @xmath19 case shows some `` tension '' between atmospheric ( 5 ) and solar ( 6 ) results not strong enough , however , to prevent their combination . from ( 5,6 ) one might get a possible indication for nonzero @xmath7 mixing , @xmath70 which favors maximal amplitude of both active and sterile channels in atmospheric and solar @xmath19 oscillations ( `` fourfold maximal mixing '' @xcite ) .
outstanding @xmath19 issues : @xmath41 @xmath41 will the solar - atmospheric data `` tension '' be weakened or not by future data ?
@xmath42 can we detect matter effects associated to @xmath7 mixing @xcite ? @xmath45
how can we discriminate the 2 + 2 and 1 + 3 spectra @xcite ?
the bounds from atmospheric @xmath17 oscillations in the @xmath64 channel [ eq .
( 2 ) ] are robust , and are preserved by @xmath18 and @xmath19 extensions . in @xmath18 scenarios , the sk+chooz data provide a bound [ eq . ( 4 ) ] on the amplitude of @xmath71 mixing . in @xmath19 scenarios , the solar+atm data are still compatible with nonzero @xmath7 mixing within present uncertainties [ eq .
further theoretical and experimental work is needed to nail down the atmospheric @xmath2 mixing amplitudes in table 1 , as well as to reduce the multiplicity of solar @xmath2 solutions in fig . 1 . 99 t. kajita , these proceedings .
f. ronga , these proceedings .
y. suzuki , these proceedings .
spentzouris , these proceedings .
fogli _ et al .
_ , prd 54 , 2048 ( 1996 ) .
fogli _ et al .
_ , prd 59 , 033001 ( 1999 ) .
fogli _ et al .
_ , hep - ph/0009299 .
j. hill , these proceedings .
p. antonioli , these proceedings .
d. montanino , these proceedings .
m. chizhov , these proceedings .
b. gavela , these proceedings .
m. lindner , these proceedings .
minakata , these proceedings .
palazzo , these proceedings .
noble , these proceedings .
e. meroni , these proceedings . c. giunti , these proceedings .
o. peres , these proceedings .
marrone , these proceedings . | best evidence @xmath2 oscillations from super - kamiokande atmospheric @xmath2 experiment @xcite macro soudan2 measurements sk data indicate two mass eigenstates @xmath3 @xmath4 nondegenerate @xmath5 @xmath3 mixed with active flavor states @xmath6 possibly fourth sterile state @xmath7 @xmath9 data @xmath10 unitarity review mixing scenarios for atmospheric @xmath2 phenomenology interplay with solar @xmath2 s @xcite lsnd @xcite outstanding issues scenarios parametrized in table 1 @xmath11 @xmath13 appropriate neutrino mixing angles @xmath14 @xmath15 relevant atmospheric @xmath2 squared mass difference @xmath16 in cases assuming @xmath17 mixing present atmospheric data provide two solid bounds @xmath20 \sin^2\psi \simeq & 0.50\pm 0.17 not significantly modified when passing to @xmath18 @xmath19 scenarios mixing angle @xmath23 @xciteccccccc case @xmath3 @xmath17 @xmath30 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath30 @xmath17 issues @xmath41 @xmath15 uncertainty reduced future long - baseline projects ? @xmath42 @xmath43 mixing maximal @xmath44 ? @xmath45 @xmath46 disappearance observe @xmath46 disappearance+appearance cycle @xcite ? atmospheric @xmath2 small squared mass difference @xmath47 neglected @xmath48 mixing table 1 bounds 2 ) preserved for unconstrained @xmath12 @xcite upper limit on @xmath49 limit strengthened by chooz reactor results @xmath50 bounds ( 2)(4 ) compatible with solutions solar @xmath2 problem figure 1 current solutions @xmath51 mass - mixing plane @xmath52 fixed values @xmath12 @xmath53 embarrassing multiplicity allowed @xmath54 regions @xcite regions favor small values @xmath12 nontrivial consistency check bounds ( 3,4 ) @xmath18 scenarios@xmath18 issues @xmath41 atmospheric data reveal @xmath55 @xcite ? @xmath42 @xmath56 push experimental sensitivity earth matter effects @xcite@xmath57 ? @xmath45 subleading effects cp violation @xmath58 atmospheric @xmath2 oscillations @xmath15 solar @xmath2 oscillations ? @xmath59 multiplicity solar @xmath2 solutions reduced ? solar atmospheric lsnd require @xmath19 scenarios one sterile neutrino @xmath7 mass spectra 2 + 2 @xcite 1 + 3 2 + 2 atmospheric @xmath2 mixing third line table 1 @xmath60 parameters additional mixing @xmath61 @xcite @xmath62 @xmath63 atmospheric oscillation channel @xmath64 @xmath65 ) intermediate values @xmath61 mixed active+sterile oscillations analysis atmospheric results 2 + 2 scenario not modified room large values @xmath61 @xmath66 disfavors pure sterile oscillations @xmath67 sterile mixing besides @xmath68 mixing study @xmath54 solar @xmath2 solutions @xmath61 @xmath19 models @xcitesolar @xmath2 data prefer large values @xmath61 @xcite @xmath69 variations chosen solution unlike @xmath19 case shows tension between atmospheric solar 6 results not combination 5,6 ) possible indication for nonzero @xmath7 mixing @xmath70 favors maximal amplitude active sterile channels atmospheric solar @xmath19 oscillations @xmath19 issues @xmath41 solar - atmospheric data tension weakened by future data ? @xmath42 detect matter effects @xmath7 mixing @xcite ? @xmath45 discriminate 2 + 2 1 + 3 spectra @xcite ? bounds from atmospheric @xmath17 oscillations in @xmath64 channel robust preserved by @xmath18 @xmath19 extensions sk+chooz data provide bound on amplitude @xmath71 mixing solar+atm data compatible with nonzero @xmath7 mixing uncertainties further theoretical experimental work needed to atmospheric @xmath2 mixing amplitudes table 1 reduce multiplicity of solar @xmath2 solutions fig . 1 kajita ronga suzuki spentzouris fogli 54 2048 1996fogli _ et al ., prd 59 , 033001 ( 1999 ) hep - ph/0009299 j. hill proceedings p. antonioli proceedings d. montanino m. chizhov b. gavela m. lindner minakata palazzo noble e. meroni c. giunti o. peres marrone proceedings | 0.310225 | 1,930 | 1,012 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,538 | within the context of exoplanetary atmospheres , we present a comprehensive linear analysis of forced , damped , magnetized shallow water systems , exploring the effects of dimensionality , geometry ( cartesian , pseudo - spherical and spherical ) , rotation , magnetic tension and hydrodynamic and magnetic sources of friction . across a broad range of conditions , we find that the key governing equation for atmospheres and quantum harmonic oscillators are identical , even when forcing ( stellar irradiation ) , sources of friction ( molecular viscosity , rayleigh drag and magnetic drag ) and magnetic tension are included .
the global atmospheric structure is largely controlled by a single , key parameter that involves the rossby and prandtl numbers .
this near - universality breaks down when either molecular viscosity or magnetic drag acts non - uniformly across latitude or a poloidal magnetic field is present , suggesting that these effects will introduce qualitative changes to the familiar chevron - shaped feature witnessed in simulations of atmospheric circulation .
we also find that hydrodynamic and magnetic sources of friction have dissimilar phase signatures and affect the flow in fundamentally different ways , implying that using rayleigh drag to mimic magnetic drag is inaccurate .
we exhaustively lay down the theoretical formalism ( dispersion relations , governing equations and time - dependent wave solutions ) for a broad suite of models . in all situations ,
we derive the steady state of an atmosphere , which is relevant to interpreting infrared phase and eclipse maps of exoplanetary atmospheres .
we elucidate a pinching effect that confines the atmospheric structure to be near the equator .
our suite of analytical models may be used to decisively develop physical intuition and as a reference point for three - dimensional , magnetohydrodynamic ( mhd ) simulations of atmospheric circulation . | with the atmospheres of exoplanets now accessible to astronomical scrutiny , there is motivation to understand the basic physics governing their structure .
since highly - irradiated exoplanets are most amenable to atmospheric characterization , a growing body of work has focused on hot earths / neptunes / jupiters , ranging from analytical models to simulations of atmospheric circulation ( e.g. , @xcite ) , in one , two and three dimensions ( 1d , 2d and 3d ) . the path towards full understanding requires the construction of a hierarchy of theoretical models of varying sophistication @xcite . in this context ,
analytical models have a vital role to play , since they provide crisp physical insight and are immune to numerical issues ( e.g. , numerical viscosity , sub - grid physics , spin - up ) .
atmospheres behave like heat engines .
sources of forcing ( e.g. , stellar irradiation ) induce atmospheric motion , which are eventually damped out by sources of friction ( e.g. , viscosity , magnetic drag ) .
it is essential to understand atmospheric dynamics , as it sets the background state of velocity , temperature , density and pressure that determines the spectral and temporal appearance of an atmosphere .
it also determines whether an atmosphere attains or is driven away from chemical , radiative and thermodynamic equilibrium .
even if an atmosphere is not in equilibrium , it must be in a global state of equipoise sources of forcing and friction negate one another ( e.g. , @xcite ) . in the present study , this is our over - arching physical goal : to analytically derive the global , steady state of an exoplanetary atmosphere ( the exoclime " ) in the presence of forcing , friction , rotation and magnetic fields .
-plane ( pseudo - spherical geometry ) and in full spherical geometry .
the key quantity to solve for is the meridional ( north - south ) velocity , from which the zonal ( east - west ) velocity , shallow water height perturbation and magnetic field perturbations straightforwardly follow . ]
[ fig : schematic ] shallow water models are a decisive way of studying exoclimes .
the term shallow water " comes from their traditional use in meteorology and oceanography @xcite and refers to the approximation that the horizontal extent modeled far exceeds the vertical / radial one .
they have been used to understand the solar tacocline @xcite , the atmospheres of neutron stars @xcite and exoplanetary atmospheres @xcite .
our over - arching technical goal is to perform a comprehensive theoretical survey across dimensionality ( 1d and 2d ) , geometry ( cartesian , pseudo - spherical and spherical ) and sources of friction ( molecular viscosity , rayleigh drag and magnetic drag ) for forced , damped , rotating , magnetized systems . to retain algebraic tractability , we study the limits of purely vertical / radial or horizontal / toroidal background magnetic fields .
our main finding is that the global structure of exoplanetary atmospheres is largely controlled by a single , key parameter at least in the shallow water approximation which we denote by @xmath0 . in the hydrodynamic limit , @xmath0
is directly related to the rossby and prandtl numbers . in forced ,
damped atmospheres with non - ideal mhd , @xmath0 encapsulates the effects of molecular viscosity , rayleigh drag , forcing , magnetic tension and magnetic drag . due to the technical nature of the present study
, we find it useful to concisely summarize a set of terminology that we will use throughout the paper . from a set of perturbed equations
, we will obtain wave solutions for the velocity , height and magnetic field perturbations .
we assume that the waves have a temporal component of the form @xmath1 , where @xmath2 is the wave frequency .
generally , the wave frequency has real and imaginary components ( @xmath3 ) , which describe the oscillatory and growing or decaying parts of the wave , respectively . for each model
, we will obtain a pair of equations describing @xmath4 and @xmath5 , which we call the oscillatory dispersion relation " and the growth / decay dispersion relation " , respectively
. we will refer to them collectively as dispersion relations " .
a balanced flow " corresponds to the situation when @xmath6 .
the steady state " of an atmosphere has @xmath7 .
we will refer to molecular viscosity , rayleigh drag and magnetic drag collectively as friction " .
if we are only considering molecular viscosity and rayleigh drag , we will use the term hydrodynamic friction " .
we will use the terms friction " and damping " interchangeably , but not qualify the latter as being hydrodynamic or mhd in nature .
we will refer to systems as being free " if forcing and friction are absent .
similarly , we will use the terms fast " and rapid " interchangeably when referring to rotation .
the zeroth order effect of including a magnetic field introduces a term each into the momentum and magnetic induction equations we will refer to the effects of these ideal - mhd terms as magnetic tension " .
when non - ideal mhd is considered , we include a resistive term in the induction equation that mathematically resembles diffusion we will refer to its influence as magnetic drag " . we will examine an approximation for including the effects of non - constant rotation , across latitude , on a cartesian grid , known traditionally as the @xmath8-plane approximation " ( e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) .
note that this is _ not _ the same as a departure from solid body rotation .
rather , it is an approximation to include the dynamical effects of sphericity .
there are two flavors of this approximation : the simpler version solves for waves that are oscillatory in both spatial dimensions ( simply called @xmath8-plane " ) , while a more sophisticated version allows for an arbitrary functional dependence in latitude ( equatorial @xmath8-plane " ) .
since the equatorial @xmath8-plane treatment more closely approximates the situation on a sphere , we will refer to it as being pseudo - spherical " . in constructing the mathematical machinery in this paper
, we often have to evaluate long , complex expressions . to this end
, we find it convenient to separate out the real and imaginary components using a series of separation functions " , which we denote by @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 .
the definitions of these dimensionless quantities vary from model to model .
we note that @xmath14 also functions like a generalized friction that includes magnetic tension .
in [ sect : equations ] , we state the governing equations and derive their linearized , perturbed forms . in [ sect:1d ] , we review and extend the 1d models .
we extend our models to 2d cartesian geometry in [ sect:2d ] and begin to consider the effects of sphericity in [ sect:2d_beta ] . in [ sect : spherical ] , we present results for 2d models in spherical geometry .
applications to exoplanetary atmospheres are described in [ sect : apps ] .
we summarize our findings in
[ sect : discussion ] .
table 1 lists the most commonly used quantities and the symbols used to denote them .
table 2 compares our study with previous analytical work .
table 3 summarizes the salient lessons learnt from studying each shallow water model .
figure [ fig : schematic ] provides a graphical summary of our technical achievements .
[ tab : symbols ] .commonly used symbols [ cols="<,^,^",options="header " , ] + note : all 2d models include rotation .
+ hd : hydrodynamic .
mhd : magnetohydrodynamic .
some useful , commonly used expressions include @xmath15 the expression involving @xmath16 makes the approximation that @xmath17 . | atmospheres of exoplanets accessible to motivation to understand basic physics structure highly - irradiated exoplanets amenable to atmospheric characterization growing work focused on hot earths neptunes jupiters analytical models to simulations of atmospheric circulation @xcite in one two three dimensions path towards full understanding requires hierarchy of theoretical models varying sophistication analytical models vital provide physical insight immune to numerical issues atmospheres behave like heat engines sources forcing stellar irradiation induce atmospheric motion damped by friction essential to understand atmospheric dynamics sets background state of velocity temperature density pressure determines spectral temporal appearance of atmosphere determines atmosphere chemical radiative thermodynamic equilibrium if atmosphere not in equilibrium must be in global state of equipoise sources forcing friction negate @xcite ) present study goal to analytically derive global steady state of exoplanetary atmosphere exoclime in presence of forcing friction rotation magnetic fields - spherical full spherical geometrykey quantity is meridional north - south ) velocity zonal east - west velocity shallow water height perturbation magnetic field perturbations follow fig schematic shallow water models studying exoclimes term water from meteorology oceanography horizontal extent exceeds vertical / radial used understand solar tacocline atmospheres of neutron stars exoplanetary atmospheres technical goal comprehensive theoretical survey across dimensionality geometry - sources of friction ( molecular viscosity rayleigh drag magnetic drag for forced damped rotating magnetized systems study limits of vertical / radial horizontal / toroidal background magnetic fields global structure of exoplanetary atmospheres controlled by single key parameter shallow water approximation @xmath0 @xmath0 related to rossby prandtl numbers forced damped atmospheres non - ideal mhd @xmath0 encapsulates effects of molecular viscosity rayleigh drag forcing magnetic tension magnetic drag summarize terminology paper from perturbed equations obtain wave solutions for velocity height magnetic field perturbations assume waves have temporal component of form @xmath1 @xmath2 is wave frequencywave frequency has real imaginary components @xmath3 describe oscillatory growing or decaying parts wave each model equations describing @xmath4 @xmath5 oscillatory dispersion relation growth / decay dispersion relation refer as dispersion relations balanced flow corresponds @xmath6 steady state of atmosphere has @xmath7 refer molecular viscosity rayleigh drag magnetic drag as friction considering molecular viscosity rayleigh drag use term hydrodynamic friction use terms friction damping interchangeably not hydrodynamic or mhd refer systems free if forcing friction absent use terms fast rapid " interchangeably rotation zeroth order effect of magnetic field introduces term into momentum magnetic induction equations effects ideal - mhd as magnetic tension non - ideal mhd resistive term in induction equation diffusion influence as magnetic drag examine approximation for including effects of non - constant rotation across latitude on cartesian grid as @xmath8-plane approximation not same as departure from solid body rotation approximation to include dynamical effects of sphericitytwo flavors approximation simpler version solves waves oscillatory in spatial dimensions ( @xmath8-plane sophisticated version allows arbitrary functional dependence in latitude ( equatorial @xmath8-plane equatorial @xmath8-plane treatment approximates situation sphere pseudo - spherical constructing mathematical machinery evaluate long complex expressions separate real imaginary components using separation functions denote by @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath14 definitions dimensionless quantities vary model to model @xmath14 functions like generalized friction magnetic tension sect : equations state governing equations derive linearized perturbed forms review extend 1d models extend models to 2d cartesian geometry consider effects of sphericity_beta spherical present results for 2d models in spherical geometry applications to exoplanetary atmospheres described in sect : apps summarize findings in : discussion table 1 lists commonly used quantities symbols table 2 compares study with previous work table 3 summarizes lessons each shallow water model figure schematic graphical summary of technical achievements tab : symbolsused symbols cols="<,^,^",options="header " 2d models include rotation hd hydrodynamic mhd magnetohydrodynamic expressions include @xmath15 expression @xmath16 @xmath17 | 0.31081 | 1,694 | 802 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,539 | we present a study of the 3-pt angular correlation function @xmath0 of ( adimensional ) temperature anisotropies measured by the wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe ( wmap ) .
results can be normalized to the 2-point function @xmath1 in terms of the hierarchical : @xmath2 or dimensionless : @xmath3 amplitudes .
strongly non - gaussian models are generically expected to show @xmath4 or @xmath5 .
unfortunately , this is comparable to the cosmic variance on large angular scales . for gaussian primordial models
, @xmath6 gives a direct measure of the non - linear corrections to temperature anisotropies in the sky : @xmath7 with @xmath8 for the leading order term in @xmath9 .
we find good agreement with the gaussian hypothesis @xmath10 within the cosmic variance of simulations ( with or without a low quadrupole ) .
the strongest constraints on @xmath6 come from scales smaller than 1 degree .
we find @xmath11 for ( pseudo ) collapsed configurations and an average of @xmath12 for non - collapsed triangles .
the corresponding non - linear coupling parameter , @xmath13 , for curvature perturbations @xmath14 , in the sachs - wolfe ( sw ) regime is : @xmath15 , while on degree scales , the extra power in acoustic oscillations produces @xmath16 in the model .
errors are dominated by cosmic variance , but for the first time they begin to be small enough to constrain the leading order non - linear effects with coupling of order unity . | we study the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) anisotropies measured by wmap @xcite from the point of view of the 3-point angular correlation @xmath17 .
current models for structure formation predict that the initial seeds , that later give rise to the observed structure in the universe , were gaussian . if so , one would expect the angular 3-point cmb temperature correlations to be almost zero . even for a gaussian field ,
any non - linear processing of the primordial perturbations would lead to small non - gaussianities . for an excellent review see @xcite and references therein .
angular correlations have some advantages over spherical harmonic analyses .
the main disadvantage is that different angular bins are highly correlated , which means that we need to use the full covariance matrix to assess the significance of any departures between measurements and models .
the advantage of using the n - point function is that correlations can be easily sampled from any region of the sky , even when a foreground mask is required , provided the region is large enough . in comparison , harmonic decomposition breaks the angular symmetry in the sky into orthogonal bases which have an arbitrary phase orientation .
this is not a problem in the case of full sky coverage , but the results will be coordinate - dependent if a mask is used
. moreover , higher order correlations , such as the bispectrum , have to focus on some small portion of the mutidimensional space of triangle configurations ( see @xcite ) . the formal equivalence between the bispectrum and the 3-point function is hardly realized in practice and as such it is of interest to study both separately .
our analysis procedure is similar to that presented in @xcite , to which the reader can refer for further details .
we use the same simulations where we ve generated maps using the standard model and a low - q model , a fiducial variation of the model with low values of the quadrupole and octopole .
we concentrate our analysis on the v - band wmap maps ( fwhm = 21 at 61ghz ) generated using healpix @xcite with pixel resolution n=512 ( 7 pixels ) and to which we apply the conservative wmap kp0 foreground mask @xcite , the resulting maps have approximately 2.4 million pixels .
the 2-point angular correlation function is defined as the expectation value or mean cross - correlation of temperature fluctuations : ( ) at two positions @xmath18 and @xmath19 in the sky : w_2 ( ) , where @xmath20 , assuming that the distribution is statistically isotropic .
we normalize fluctuations to be dimensionless , @xmath21k , or dimensional with @xmath22 . to estimate @xmath23 from the pixel maps we use : w_2 ( ) = _ i , j _ i _ j w_i w_j , where @xmath24 and @xmath25 are the observed temperature fluctuations on the sky and the sum extends to all pairs @xmath26 separated by @xmath27 .
the mean temperature fluctuation is subtracted so that @xmath28 .
the weights @xmath29 can be used to minimize the variance when the pixel noise is not uniform , however this introduces larger cosmic variance . here
we follow the wmap team and use uniform weights ( i.e. @xmath30 ) . at the largest scales we use bins @xmath31 whose size is proportional to the square root of the angle @xmath32 and use linear bins of @xmath33 degrees at the smallest scales . in a similar fashion , the 3-point angular correlation function is defined as the cross - correlation of temperature fluctuations at 3 positions @xmath18 , @xmath19 and @xmath34 on the sky : w_3(_12 , _ 13 , _ 23 ) , where @xmath35 .
consider a triplet of pixels with labels 1,2,3 on the sky .
let @xmath36 and @xmath37 be the angular separations between the corresponding pairs of pixels and @xmath38 the interior angle between these two sides of the triangle .
assuming that the distribution is statistically isotropic , @xmath17 only depends on the sides of the triangles that define the 3 positions on the sky .
one can characterize the configuration - dependence of the three - point function by studying the behavior of @xmath39 for fixed @xmath36 and @xmath37 . to estimate @xmath40 from the pixel maps we use : w_3(_12 , _ 13 , _ 23 ) = _ i , j , k _ i _ j _ k
w_i w_j w_k , where @xmath24 , @xmath25 and @xmath41 are the temperature differences in the map and the sum extends to all triplets separated by @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath44 .
we use same bins and weights as in the 2-point function above .
the 3-point function can either be normalized to a dimensionless amplitude : d_3 where @xmath45 , or a hierarchical amplitude : q_3 .
the covariance matrix between different angular bins can be calculated from the simulations : c_ij & & w_2(_i ) w_2(_j ) + & = & 1 _ l=1^n w_2^l(_i ) w_2^l(_j ) , where @xmath46 . here
@xmath47 is the 2-point or 3-point function measured in the @xmath48-th realization ( @xmath49 ) and @xmath50 is the mean value for the @xmath51 realizations .
the case @xmath52 gives the error variance : @xmath53 .
an estimate of the errors for correlations measured on the real sky can be obtained using a variation of the jackknife error scheme .
this has the potential advantage of producing an error estimate which is model independent .
the accuracy of the jack - knife covariance have been tested for both wmap @xcite and the apm and sdss survey @xcite , @xcite , @xcite . in the estimation ,
the sample is first divided into @xmath54 separate regions on the sky , each of equal area . the analysis is then performed @xmath54 times , on each occasion removing a different region .
these are called the ( jackknife ) subsamples , which we label @xmath55 .
the estimated statistical covariance for @xmath56 at scales @xmath57 and @xmath58 is then given by : c_ij & = & m-1 _ k=1^m w_2^k(_i ) w_2^k(_j ) + & & w_2^k(_i ) w_2^k(_i ) - ( _ i ) where @xmath59 is the measure 2 or 3-point function in the @xmath60-th subsample ( @xmath61 ) and @xmath62 is the mean value for the @xmath54 subsamples .
the case @xmath52 gives the error variance .
note how , if we increase the number of regions @xmath54 , the jackknife subsamples are larger and each term in the sum is smaller .
we typically take @xmath63 corresponding to a division of the sphere into 8 octants .
note that the 3-point correlation function is in general a function of 3 variables .
we will fix two of these variables and show variations of @xmath17 or @xmath6 as a function of a single variable , for which we estimate the covariance with the above prescription .
estimation of correlations in configuration space is quite time consuming .
a brute force algorithm to estimate all pair separations in a map with @xmath51 pixels takes @xmath64 operations .
to do all triplets in eq.[[w3est ] ] we need @xmath65 operations . in the healpix @xmath66 wmap maps ( 7 arcmin pixel s )
we have @xmath67 ( with the kp0 mask galactic cut ) so a brute force analysis requires @xmath68 operations , well beyond current computing power .
we overcome this difficulty in two steps . for large scales , @xmath69 degree , we reduce the resolution of the maps to @xmath70 ( 1 degree resolution ) by averaging fluctuations over nearby pixels .
the resulting correlation function contains the same information at scales larger than the new resolution scale .
now the number of pixels is reduced to @xmath71 and the number of operations to @xmath72 , which lies within current computer power ( teraflops ) . for scales smaller than a few degrees
we can reduce the number of operations by precalculating the distance between neighboring pixels .
the number of operations is then reduced to @xmath73 , where @xmath74 is the number of neighbors . in our case
we have @xmath75 for pixels around @xmath76 degrees , and thus @xmath77 as in the case for the larger angles . in our implementation
we have an overlap between the large and small scale estimations at around @xmath78 degrees .
the agreement between both estimates here is quite good for both @xmath79 and @xmath17 . in the case of the 2-point function
we have compared both estimates in the whole range @xmath80 degrees and find excellent agreement .
3.3 in 3.3 in results are presented in figures [ w3co ] and [ q3al ] . at large scales fig.[w3co ] shows the results of @xmath17 in units of @xmath81 ( eg @xmath82 in eq.[[delta ] ] ) .
note that @xmath83 at small scales , so that @xmath84 in these units ( see eq.[[d3 ] ] ) .
errorbars in both cases are from jackknife subsamples and agree well with errors estimated from the simulations ( see gaztaaga etal 2003 for more details ) .
the results for the equilateral and collapsed triangle configurations can be compared to the cobe analysis presented in fig.1 of @xcite .
the pseudo - collapsed case in @xcite would correspond here to @xmath85 here .
we can see how the cobe and wmap results are in good agreement where the two curves even see the very same bumps and valleys .
this is not totally surprising given the very good match between cobe and wmap temperatures maps , pixel by pixel , when smoothed on large scales .
the top panel in figure [ w3co ] also shows two new triangle configurations : one that is elongated , @xmath86 ( short dashed line ) , and a wide triangle , @xmath87 ( continuous line ) .
the results for intermediate angular configurations are similar . in all cases
the agreement with the gaussian prediction @xmath88 is excellent , given the strong covariance . at small scales
we show the 3-point function in terms of the reduced amplitude @xmath6 in eq.[[q3 ] ] where the best constraints are found on the smallest scales . as can be seen in the figure ,
as we approach triangles with side @xmath89degree , the cosmic errors become large @xmath90 .
we have fit the data to a constant value of @xmath6 , independent of scale using a @xmath91-test : ^2 = _ i , j=1^n _ i c_ij^-1 _ j , where @xmath92 is the difference between the `` observation '' @xmath93 and the @xmath94 value . in order to eliminate the degeneracies in the covariance matrix , we perform a singular value decomposition ( svd ) of the covariance matrix ( see gaztaaga 2003 for more details ) .
a joint fit with the jackknife covariance matrix for collapsed configurations with @xmath95 degree , yields : q_3^collapsed = 19 141 .
the best signal - to - noise is found for the non - collapsed triangle configurations with @xmath96 degree we find : q_3 = 336 218 ; = 0.5 deg providing a marginal detection at about 90% confidence ( shown as dashed line in fig.[q3al ] ) .
this fit corresponds to the jackknife covariance matrix .
a similar result is found for the covariance matrix in the low - q simulations .
the errors increase by almost a factor of two when using the covariance of the standard simulations .
this increase is due to the larger cosmic variance introduced by the quadrupole and octopole which are larger than in the wmap data ( see @xcite , citepgaz03 for a discussion ) .
our bounds on @xmath13 seem marginally better than the ones presented in @xcite from the wmap bispectrum , but a direct comparison is not straight forward .
first of all , our modelling provides a measurement of non - linearities in the final @xmath107 while @xcite provide a modelling for non - linear primordial curvature perturbations @xmath14 , before radiation transfer .
thus while limits on @xmath6 are model independent , direct limits on @xmath13 depend on the assumed model for radiation transfer . secondly , the bispectrum configurations used by @xcite are a subset of all possible triangle configurations so that both approaches are neither equivalent nor optimized in the same way . in both cases ,
errors are dominated by cosmic variance , and they begin to be small enough to constrain the leading order non - linear effects with coupling @xmath13 which are of order unity .
eg acknowledged support from inaoe , the spanish ministerio de ciencia y tecnologia , project aya2002 - 00850 , ec - feder funding and the supercomputing center in barcelona ( cepba and cesca / c4 ) , where part of these calculations were done .
jw thanks eric hivon for providing assistance during the installation of healpix and acknowledges support from a conacyt grant ( 39953-f ) and a scholarship from inaoe .
grski , k. m. , hivon , e. , & wandelt , b. d. , 1999 , in proceedings of the mpa / eso cosmology conference `` evolution of large - scale structure '' , eds .
banday , r.s .
sheth and l. da costa , printpartners ipskamp , nl , pp .
37 - 42 ( also astro - ph/9812350 ) . | study cosmic microwave background anisotropies measured by wmap @xcite 3-point angular correlation @xmath17 models for structure formation predict initial seeds observed structure gaussian angular 3-point cmb temperature correlations almost zero gaussian field non - linear processing of primordial perturbations to small non - gaussianities review see @xcite references angular correlations advantages over spherical harmonic analyses disadvantage different angular bins highly correlated need full covariance matrix to assess departures between measurements models advantage of n - point function correlations sampled from any region sky foreground mask region large harmonic decomposition breaks angular symmetry into orthogonal bases arbitrary phase orientation not problem in full sky coverage results coordinate - dependent if mask used higher order correlations focus on small portion mutidimensional space of triangle configurations @xcite formal equivalence between bispectrum and 3-point function hardly realized study both separately analysis procedure similar to @xcite for use same simulations generated maps using standard model and low - q model low values of quadrupole octopoleanalysis on v - band wmap maps 21 at 61ghz healpix @xcite pixel resolution n=512 7 pixels conservative wmap kp0 foreground mask @xcite maps 2.4 million pixels 2-point angular correlation function - correlation temperature fluctuations at @xmath18 @xmath19 sky_2 @xmath20 distribution isotropic normalize fluctuations dimensionless dimensional with @xmath22 estimate @xmath23 w_2 ( ) = j @xmath24 @xmath25 observed temperature fluctuations sky sum extends to all pairs @xmath26 separated by @xmath27 mean temperature fluctuation subtracted @xmath28 weights @xmath29 minimize variance pixel noise introduces larger cosmic variance follow use uniform weights @xmath30 largest scales use bins @xmath31 proportional to square root angle @xmath32 linear bins @xmath33 degrees smallest scales 3-point angular correlation function cross - correlation temperature fluctuations at 3 positions @xmath18 sky w_3(_12 13 23 @xmath35 triplet of pixels labels 1,2,3 sky@xmath36 angular separations between pixels @xmath38 interior angle sides triangle distribution isotropic @xmath17 depends on sides triangles 3 positions sky configuration - dependence three - point function behavior @xmath39 @xmath36 @xmath37 estimate @xmath40 from pixel maps : w_3(_12 13 23 ) = i j k @xmath24 @xmath41 temperature differences map sum extends to triplets separated by @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 same bins weights 2-point function 3-point function normalized to dimensionless amplitude d_3 or hierarchical amplitude q_3 covariance matrix between angular bins calculated from simulations : c_ij w_2(_i_2(_j ) + = 1 _ l=1 w_2^l @xmath46 @xmath47 2-point 3-point function in @xmath48-th realization @xmath50 mean value for @xmath51 realizations @xmath52 error variance : @xmath53 estimate of errors for correlations real sky jackknife error scheme error estimate model independentjack - knife covariance tested for wmap @xcite apm sdss survey estimation sample divided into @xmath54 regions equal area analysis performed @xmath54 times removing different region jackknife subsamples label @xmath55 estimated covariance for @xmath56 at scales @xmath57 @xmath58 given by c_ij & = m-1 _ k=1^m w_2^k( )_2^k(_j + - @xmath59 measure 2 3-point function in @xmath60-th subsample @xmath62 mean value for @xmath54 subsamples @xmath52 gives error variance increase number regions @xmath54 jackknife subsamples larger term sum smaller take @xmath63 division sphere into 8 octants 3-point correlation function function of 3 variables fix two variables show variations of @xmath17 or @xmath6 as function single variable estimate covariance estimation correlations in configuration space time consuming estimate pair separations map with @xmath51 pixels takes @xmath64 operations need @xmath65 operationshealpix @xmath66 wmap maps 7 arcmin pixel s @xmath67 kp0 mask galactic cut brute force analysis requires @xmath68 operations beyond current computing power overcome difficulty two steps large scales @xmath69 degree reduce resolution to @xmath70 1 degree resolution averaging fluctuations nearby pixels correlation function contains same information scales larger number pixels reduced to @xmath71 operations @xmath72 within current computer power teraflops scales smaller reduce operations precalculating distance between neighboring pixels operations reduced to @xmath73 @xmath74 number neighbors @xmath75 pixels around @xmath76 degrees @xmath77 larger angles overlap large small scale estimations @xmath78 degrees agreement estimates good @xmath79 @xmath17 2-point function compared estimates whole range @xmath80 degrees excellent agreement 3.3 results figures [ w3co ] [ q3al ] large scales fig.[w3co results @xmath17 units @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 small scales @xmath84 units errorbars from jackknife subsamples agree with errors simulations gaztaaga etal 2003 detailsresults for equilateral collapsed triangle configurations compared to cobe analysis fig.1 @xcite pseudo - collapsed case to @xmath85 cobe wmap results two curves see same bumps valleys not good match between cobe wmap temperatures maps on large scales top panel figure shows two new triangle configurations elongated @xmath86 wide triangle @xmath87 continuous line results intermediate angular configurations similar agreement with gaussian prediction @xmath88 excellent strong covariance small scales 3-point function reduced amplitude @xmath6 eq best constraints on smallest scales triangles with side @xmath89degree cosmic errors become large @xmath90 fit data to constant value of @xmath6 independent scale using @xmath91-test = @xmath92 difference between observation @xmath93 @xmath94 value to eliminate degeneracies covariance matrix singular value decomposition covariance matrix see gaztaaga 2003 details joint fit with jackknife covariance matrix for collapsed configurations with @xmath95 degree yields q_3^collapsed = 19 141 .best signal - to - noise non - collapsed triangle configurations with @xmath96 degree q_3 = 336 218 ; = 0.5 deg marginal detection 90% confidence dashed line fig.[q3al fit corresponds to jackknife covariance matrix similar result low - q simulations errors increase factor two standard simulations due to larger cosmic variance quadrupole octopole larger wmap data on @xmath13 better than @xcite direct comparison not straight forward our modelling non - linearities final @xmath107 @xcite non - linear primordial curvature perturbations @xmath14 before radiation transfer limits on @xmath6 model independent limits @xmath13 depend on assumed model radiation transfer bispectrum configurations @xcite subset of triangle configurations approaches neither equivalent optimized errors dominated by cosmic variance small constrain leading order non - linear effects coupling @xmath13 unity support from inaoe spanish ministerio de ciencia y tecnologia project aya2002 - 00850 ec - feder funding supercomputing center barcelona thanks eric hivon assistance installation healpix support conacyt grant scholarship from inaoegrski hivon wandelt 1999 proceedings mpa eso cosmology conference evolution large - scale structure eds banday sheth l da costa ipskamp nl pp 37 - 42 astro - ph/9812350 | 0.50043 | 3,056 | 1,586 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,544 | let @xmath0 be a prime . in this paper we give a proof of the following result : a valued field @xmath1 of characteristic @xmath2 is @xmath0-henselian if and only if every element of strictly positive valuation if of the form @xmath3 for some @xmath4 . | throughout this paper , all fields have characteristic @xmath2 .
first we recall some definitions and notations .
let @xmath5 be the valuation ring associated with @xmath6 .
it is a local ring , and @xmath7 is its maximal ideal .
let @xmath8 be the residue field ( or @xmath9 when there is no danger of confusion ) .
we let @xmath10 denote the _ compositum _ of all finite galois extensions of @xmath11 of degree a power of @xmath0 .
a valued field @xmath1 is @xmath0-henselian if @xmath6 extends uniquely to @xmath10 .
equivalently ( see @xcite , thm 4.3.2 ) , if it satisfies a restricted version of hensel s lemma ( which we call @xmath0-hensel lemma ) : @xmath11 is @xmath0-henselian if and only if every polynomial @xmath12 $ ] which splits in @xmath10 and with residual image in @xmath13 $ ] having a simple root @xmath14 in @xmath15 , has a root @xmath16 in @xmath17 with @xmath18 .
furthermore , another result ( see @xcite , thm 4.2.2 ) shows that @xmath1 is @xmath0-henselian if and only if @xmath6 extends uniquely to every galois extension of degree @xmath0 .
+ the aim of this note is to give a complete proof of the following result : + * theorem*. let @xmath1 be a valued field .
@xmath1 is @xmath0-henselian _ if and only if _ @xmath19 .
+ this result was announced in @xcite , proposition 1.4 , however the proof was not complete .
the notion of @xmath0-henselianity is important in the study of fields with definable valuations , and in particular it is important to show that the property of @xmath0-henselianity is an elementary property of valued fields .
the proof we give is elementary , and uses extensively pseudo - convergent sequences and their properties . recall that a sequence @xmath20 indexed by an ordinal @xmath21 is said to be _ pseudo - convergent _ if for all @xmath22 : @xmath23 a pseudo - convergent sequence @xmath24 is called _ algebraic _ if there is a polynomial @xmath25 in @xmath26 $ ] such that @xmath27 ultimately for all @xmath28 , _ i.e _ : @xmath29 otherwise , it is called _
transcendental_. we assume familiarity with the properties of pseudo - convergent sequences , see @xcite for more details , and in particular theorem 3 , lemmas 4 and 8 .
first , we prove a lemma in order to restrict our study to immediate extensions : + * observation*. _ let @xmath1 be a valued field and @xmath30 be a galois extension of degree a prime @xmath31 .
then , if @xmath32 is residual or ramified , @xmath33 is the unique extension of @xmath6 to @xmath34 . _ the fundamental equality of valuation theory ( see @xcite , thm 3.3.3 ) tells us that if @xmath34 is a galois extension of @xmath11 , then @xmath35 = e(l / k)f(l / k)gd\ ] ] where @xmath36 is the ramification index , @xmath37 the residue index , @xmath38 the number of extensions of @xmath6 to @xmath34 and @xmath39 , the defect , is a power of @xmath0 .
the forward direction is an immediate application of the @xmath0-hensel lemma.conversely , assume that @xmath44 .
every galois extension of @xmath11 of degree @xmath0 is an artin - schreier extension , _
i.e _ is generated over @xmath11 by a root @xmath16 of a polynomial @xmath45 , with @xmath46 .
the previous observation gives us the result when @xmath47 is not immediate .
let @xmath34 be an immediate galois extension of degree @xmath0 and @xmath48 an extension of @xmath6 to @xmath34 ( hence with the same value group @xmath49 and residue field @xmath50 as @xmath11 ) .
we can write @xmath51 where @xmath52 .
+ step 1 : ( claim ) the set @xmath53 is contained in @xmath54 and has no last element .
first observe that @xmath55 : if @xmath56 , then the equation @xmath57 has a root in @xmath11 , so that @xmath58 : contradiction .
let @xmath59 , @xmath60 such that @xmath61 . as @xmath62 is immediate
there is @xmath63 such that @xmath64 . if @xmath65 then @xmath66 and @xmath67 in @xmath68 , which as above give a contradiction .
hence @xmath69 , and from @xmath70 , we deduce that @xmath71 , and @xmath72 .
this shows the claim .
+ step 2 : we extract a strictly well - ordered increasing and cofinal sequence from @xmath73 .
if we write @xmath74 , we get a sequence @xmath24 in @xmath11 such that the sequence @xmath75 is stricly increasing and cofinal in @xmath73 .
thus , the sequence @xmath76 is pseudo - convergent ( with @xmath77 one of its limits ) . as @xmath78
, we have @xmath79 for @xmath80 .
thus , the sequence @xmath81 is also pseudo - convergent .
furthermore , @xmath24 has no limit in @xmath11 : if @xmath82 is a limit of @xmath24 then @xmath83 is a limit of @xmath76 . as @xmath84 is cofinal in @xmath73
, @xmath85 would be a maximal element of @xmath73 : contradiction .
+ step 3 : ( claim ) let @xmath86 $ ] , and assume that @xmath87 is strictly increasing ultimately .
then @xmath88 .
+ we take such a @xmath89 of minimal degree , assume this degree is @xmath90 , and will derive a contradiction .
one consequence of lemma 8 in @xcite is that : @xmath91 where @xmath92 is the ultimate valuation of @xmath93 and @xmath94 is the valuation of @xmath95 for @xmath96 ( which does not depend on @xmath97 as @xmath24 is pseudo - convergent ) .
we write @xmath98 with @xmath99 . then , @xmath100 is ultimately of constant valuation , and we let @xmath101 be this valuation . as @xmath24 has no limit in @xmath11 , it is easy to see that @xmath102 , so that @xmath103 . by lemma 4 in @xcite
, there is an integer @xmath104 such that we have ultimately : @xmath105 then , ultimately : @xmath106 thus , we have ultimately @xmath107 . as @xmath108 ,
the left hand side of the equation increases strictly monotonically with @xmath109 .
but the right hand side is constant : it has no dependence in @xmath109 !
we have a contradiction , thus @xmath110 . + step 4 : clearly , @xmath24 is of algebraic type . by theorem 3 in @xcite , if @xmath111 is a root of @xmath25 , we get an immediate extension @xmath112 .
let @xmath113 , we have @xmath114 isomorphic to @xmath115 .
thus : @xmath116 \quad \tilde{v}\big(q(a)\big ) = v'\big(q(a)\big ) = v\big(q(a_\rho)\big ) \text { ultimately}\ ] ] this shows the uniqueness of @xmath48 and concludes the proof of the theorem . | paper fields characteristic @xmath2 recall definitions notations @xmath5 valuation ring @xmath6 local ring @xmath7 maximal ideal @xmath8 residue field or @xmath9 no danger confusion @xmath10 denote compositum finite galois extensions @xmath11 @xmath0 valued field @xmath1 @xmath0-henselian if @xmath6 extends to @xmath10 4.3.2 satisfies restricted version hensel s lemma @xmath0-hensel lemma @xmath11 @xmath0-henselian polynomial @xmath12 splits in @xmath10 residual image @xmath13 simple root @xmath14 @xmath15 root @xmath16 in @xmath17 @xmath18 result 4.2.2 shows @xmath1 @xmath0-henselian if @xmath6 extends to every galois extension degree @xmath0 aim complete proof result @xmath1 valued field @xmath1 @xmath0-henselian if @xmath19 result announced @xcite proposition 1.4 proof not complete notion @xmath0-henselianity important study fields definable valuations @xmath0-henselianity elementary property valued fieldsproof elementary uses pseudo - convergent sequences properties sequence @xmath20 indexed by ordinal @xmath21 pseudo - convergent @xmath22 @xmath23 pseudo - convergent sequence @xmath24 algebraic polynomial @xmath25 in @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 transcendental familiarity properties pseudo - convergent sequences @xcite theorem 3 lemmas 4 8 prove lemma restrict study immediate extensions @xmath1 valued field @xmath30 galois extension @xmath31 @xmath32 residual ramified @xmath33 unique extension @xmath6 to @xmath34 equality valuation theory @xmath34 galois extension of @xmath11 @xmath35 = e(l / k)f(l / k)gd @xmath36 ramification index @xmath37 residue index @xmath38 number of extensions @xmath6 to @xmath34 @xmath39 power of @xmath0 forward direction application @xmath0-hensel lemma @xmath44 galois extension @xmath11 artin - schreier extension generated over @xmath11 by root @xmath16 polynomial @xmath45 @xmath46observation @xmath47 not immediate @xmath34 extension @xmath0 @xmath48 @xmath6 @xmath34 same value group @xmath49 residue field @xmath50 @xmath11 write @xmath51 where @xmath52 set @xmath53 @xmath54 no last element @xmath55 @xmath56 equation @xmath57 root @xmath11 @xmath58 contradiction @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 immediate @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 in @xmath68 contradiction @xmath69 @xmath70 deduce @xmath71 @xmath72 claim step extract increasing cofinal sequence from @xmath73 @xmath74 sequence @xmath24 in @xmath11 @xmath75 increasing cofinal in @xmath73 sequence @xmath76 pseudo - convergent @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 for @xmath80 sequence @xmath81 pseudo - convergent @xmath24 no limit in @xmath11 @xmath82 limit @xmath24 @xmath83 limit @xmath76 @xmath84 cofinal @xmath73 @xmath85 maximal element @xmath73 contradictionstep 3 claim @xmath86 assume @xmath87 increasing @xmath88 @xmath89 minimal degree assume degree @xmath90 derive contradiction consequence lemma 8 @xcite @xmath91 @xmath92 valuation @xmath93 @xmath94 valuation @xmath95 @xmath96 depend on @xmath97 @xmath24 pseudo - convergent write @xmath98 with @xmath99 @xmath100 constant valuation @xmath101 valuation @xmath24 no limit in @xmath11 see @xmath102 @xmath103 lemma 4 @xcite integer @xmath104 ultimately @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 left hand side equation increases monotonically with @xmath109 right side constant no dependence in @xmath109 contradiction @xmath110 step 4 @xmath24 algebraic type theorem 3 @xcite @xmath111 root of @xmath25 immediate extension @xmath112 @xmath113 @xmath114 isomorphic to @xmath115 @xmath116 \big(q\big = v\big(q\big = v\big\big ) shows uniqueness @xmath48 concludes proof theorem | 0.26504 | 1,818 | 1,050 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,547 | the radiative corrections to the pure leptonic decay @xmath0 up - to one - loop order is presented .
we find the virtual photon loop corrections to @xmath1 is negative and the corresponding branching ratio is larger than @xmath2 .
considering the possible experimental resolutions , our prediction of the radiative decay @xmath3 is not so large as others , and the best channel to determine the @xmath4 or @xmath5 is @xmath6 . how to cancel the infrared divergences appearing in the loop calculations , and the radiative decay @xmath7 is shown precisely .
it is emphasized that the radiative decay may be separated properly and may compare with measurements directly as long as the theoretical ` softness ' of the photon corresponds to the experimental resolutions .
9.in 6.2 in @xmath8 , department of physics , fujian normal university , fuzhou 350007 , china + @xmath9 , institute of theoretical physics , academia sinica , p.o.box 2735 , beijing 100080,china + @xmath10 , department of physics , nankai university , tianjin 300070 , china + @xmath11 , ccast ( world laboratory ) p.o .
box 8730 , beijing 100080 , china . | the pure leptonic decays of the heavy - light meson @xmath12 are very interesting . in principle
, the pure - leptonic decay @xmath13(see , fig.1 ) can be used to determine the decay constant @xmath5 if the fundamental cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa matrix element @xmath4 of standard model ( sm ) is known .
conversely if we know the value of decay constant @xmath5 from other method@xcite , these process also can be used to extract the matrix element @xmath4 .
but there are the well known effect of helicity suppression and there are only one detected finial state , the measurement of pure leptonic decays of such pseudoscalar meson is very difficult .
the pure leptonic weak decays of the pseudoscalar meson corresponding to fig.1 are helicity suppressed by factor of @xmath14 : @xmath15 of them only the process @xmath16 is special , it does not suffer so much from the helicity suppression , and its branching ratio may reach to @xmath17 .
however the produced @xmath18 will decay promptly and one more neutrino is generated in the cascade decay at least , thus it makes the decay channel difficult to be observed .
for the channels when the lepton is @xmath19 or @xmath20 and their neutrinos , besides the small branching ratios , there are only one detected finial state , the measurement of such channels are very difficult .
fortunately , having an extra real photon emitted in the leptonic decays , the radiative pure leptonic decays can escape from the suppression@xcite , furthermore , as pointed out in ref.@xcite , with the extra photon to identify the decaying pseudoscalar meson @xmath12 in experiment from the backgrounds has advantages , since one more particle can be detected in the detector . although the radiative corrections are suppressed by an extra electromagnetic coupling constant @xmath21 , it will not be suppressed by the helicity suppression .
therefore , the radiative decay may be comparable , even larger than the corresponding pure leptonic decays@xcite .
so , the problem to increase the accuracy of the theoretical calculation , at least up to the first order radiative corrections , emerges .
the radiative pure leptonic decays , theoretically , have infrared divergences and will be canceled with those from loop corrections of the pure leptonic decays . in all the existing calculation of radiative decays@xcite ,
this part is ignored , since they do not include the radiative corrections of the pure leptonic decays . in this paper , we are interested in considering the radiative decays and the pure leptonic decays with one - loop radiative corrections together .
since the process @xmath16 dose not suffer the helicity supression and has a large branching ratio , the corresponding loop correction(virtual photon ) to these process should has a considerable larger branching ratio , at least comparing with the radiative decay , and can not be ignored . the paper is organized as follow : in section ii , we present the calculations of radiative pure leptonic contributions : _
i ) _ besides the leptonic decays shown as fig.1 , the radiative decays into three family leptons with a real photon appearing in the final state as shown in fig.2 ; _ ii ) _ the virtual photon corrections to the pure leptonic decays , i.e. , a photon in loop as shown in figs.3.1 , 3.2 , 3.3 , 3.4 . in section iii
, we evaluate the values of the decays . as uncertainties the dependence of the results on the parameters appearing in the considered model
is discussed .
finally , preliminary conclusion is obtained .
let us start with the radiative decay .
these contributions are corresponding to the four diagrams in fig.2 . according to the constituent quark model which is formulated by bethe - salpeter ( b .- s . )
equation , the amplitude turns out to be the four terms @xmath22 : @xmath23\times\ ] ] @xmath24 { \epsilon}^{\lambda}\times\ ] ] @xmath25 @xmath26{\frac { i \left(-g^{\mu\nu}+ \frac{p^{\mu}p^{\nu}}{m_{w}^{2}}\right)}{p^{2}-m_{w}^{2}}}\ ] ] @xmath27 @xmath28\ ] ] @xmath29 @xmath30\ ] ] @xmath31 where @xmath32 is bethe - salpeter wave function of the meson @xmath12 ; @xmath33 is the momentum of @xmath12 ; @xmath34 are the polarization vector and momentum of the emitted photon . in the quark model ,
the momenta of @xmath35-quarks inside the bound state , i.e. , the @xmath12 meson , are : @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the relative momentum of the two quarks inside the @xmath12 meson . as the @xmath12 meson is a nonrelativistic bound state in nature ,
so the higher order relativistic corrections may be computed precisely , but being an approximation for a @xmath38-wave state , and focusing the light on the radiative decay corrections only at this moment now , we ignore @xmath37 dependence , i.e. , we may still have the non - relativistic spin structure for the wave function of the meson @xmath12 ( a @xmath39 state ) correspondingly : @xmath40 here @xmath41 is the wave function at origin , and by definitions it connects to the decay constant @xmath5 : @xmath42 where m is the mass of @xmath12 meson .
moreover we note that for convenience we take unitary gauge for weak bosons to do the calculations throughout the paper . with a straightforward computation
, the amplitude can be simplified as : @xmath43 @xmath44(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell},\ ] ] @xmath45 @xmath46 & + & \left .
is_{1}\varepsilon^{\alpha\mu\beta\nu}p_{\alpha } \epsilon_{\mu}k_{\beta}\gamma_{\nu}\right]+ \frac{(\not\ !
{ p}-\not\ ! { k})}{m_{w}^{2}}p\cdot{\epsilon}(m^{2}-p\cdot{k } )
\right\}(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell } , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath47 is the momentum of the charged lepton , and @xmath48 @xmath49 as a matter of fact , there is infrared infinity when performing phase space integral about the square of matrix element at the soft photon limit .
it is known that the infrared infinity can be cancelled completely by that of the loop corrections to the corresponding pure leptonic decay @xmath50 . in eqs.(7 ) and ( 8) , the infrared terms can be read out : @xmath51(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell}.\ ] ] as the diagrams ( g ) , ( h ) , ( i ) , ( j ) in figs.3.3 , 3.4 always have a further suppression factor @xmath52 to compare with the other loop diagrams , and there is no infrared infinity in these four loop diagrams , we may ignore the contributions from these four diagrams safely . furthermore we should note that in our calculations throughout the paper , the dimensional regularization to regularize both infrared and ultraviolet divergences is adopted , while the on - mass - shell renormalization for the ultraviolet divergence is used .
if feynman gauge for photon is taken ( we always do so in the paper ) , the amplitude corresponding to the diagrams ( a ) , ( b ) of fig.3.1 can be written as : @xmath53}\right]\ ] ] @xmath54 ( -\gamma_{\nu})(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell},\ ] ] @xmath55}\right]\ ] ] @xmath56 ( -\gamma_{\nu})(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell},\ ] ] where the @xmath57 , @xmath58 denote the momenta of the loop and the neutrino respectively .
these two terms also have infrared infinity when integrating out the loop momentum @xmath57 . after doing the on - mass - shell subtraction , the terms corresponding to vertex and self - energy diagrams ( c ) , ( d ) , ( e )
, ( f ) can be written as : @xmath59 @xmath60@xmath61.\ ] ] now let us see the cancellation of the infrared divergencies precisely .
the infrared parts of the decay widths which are from the interference of the self - energy and vertex correction diagrams with the tree diagrams : @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 \ ; ; \ ] ] the infrared part of the decay widths from the interference of the `` box '' correction diagrams with the tree diagrams : @xmath65\ ; ; \ ] ] the infrared part of the decay width from the real photon emission : @xmath66 @xmath67 \;.\ ] ] here @xmath68 is a small energy , which corresponds to the experimental resolution of a soft photon so that the phase space of the emitting photon in fact is divided into a soft and a hard part by @xmath68 . where @xmath20 is the dimensional parameter appearing in the dimensional regularization .
it is easy to check that when adding up all the parts : the real photon emission @xmath69 and the virtual photon corrections @xmath70 , the infrared divergences @xmath71 are canceled totally and the @xmath20 dependence is also cancelled .
hence we may be sure that we finally obtain the pure leptonic widths for the @xmath12 meson decays to the three families of leptons which are accurate up - to the ` next'-order corrections and ` infrared finite ' but depend on the experimental resolution @xmath68 .
first of all , let us show the ` whole ' leptonic decay widths , i.e. , the sum of the corresponding radiative decay widths and the corresponding pure leptonic decay widths with radiative corrections , and put them in table ( 1 ) . why we put the radiative decay and the pure leptonic decay with radiative corrections together here
is to make the width not to depend on the experimental resolution for a soft photon .
the values for the parameters @xmath72 , @xmath73@xcite , @xmath74 gev , @xmath75 gev , @xmath76 gev and @xmath77 gev@xcite . + considering the possible experimental resolutions , our prediction of the radiative decay widths @xmath78 and @xmath79 are close to the values in ref@xcite , but our prediction of @xmath80 is much smaller than the one in ref@xcite . in our model , if we using a smaller cut @xmath81 , the obtained @xmath82 will become larger , but since the decay widths depend on @xmath83 , the change of branching ratios will be not so much on the selecting of @xmath81 , we can see this in table ( 5 ) and ( 6 ) , and for another example , if @xmath84 , the @xmath85 , @xmath86 , @xmath87 , but it is very difficult to obtain so small a @xmath81 in experiment .
we can conclude that the best radiative decay channel is easy to search is @xmath88 . for the convenience to compare with experiments , we present the photon spectrum of the radiative decays in fig.4 and fig.5 .
in addition , we should note that the widths are quite sensitive to the decay constant @xmath5 , and are sensitive to the values of the quark masses @xmath89 and @xmath90 .
s2 as.abada et al .
phys . b*376 * ( 1992 ) 172 .
c.r.allton et al . , ape collaboration , nucl .
b(proc . suppl.)*34 * ( 1993 ) 465 .
c.w.bernard et al . , phys .
rev . d*49 * ( 1994 ) 2536 .
gustavo burdman , t.goldman and daniel wyler , phys .
rev . d*51 * ( 1995 ) 111 .
d.arwood , g.eilam and a.soni , mod .
a11 ( 1996 ) 1061 .
c.q.geng,c.c.lih and wei - min zhang,*hep - ph*/0012066 .
chang , c - d l , g .-
wang and h .- s .
zong , phys .
rev . d*60 * ( 1999 ) 114013 .
d.e.groom et al . , the european physical journal c*15 * ( 2000 ) 1 .
c.r.allton et al . ,
ape collaboration , nucl .
* 34 * ( 1993 ) 456 . | pure leptonic decays heavy - light meson @xmath12 interesting pure - leptonic decay @xmath13 fig.1 determine decay constant @xmath5 if fundamental cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa matrix element @xmath4 standard model known if value decay constant @xmath5 other method@xcite extract matrix element @xmath4 effect helicity suppression one detected finial state measurement pure leptonic decays difficult pure leptonic weak decays meson.1 helicity suppressed by factor @xmath14 : @xmath15 process @xmath16 special suffer helicity suppression branching ratio reach to @xmath17 @xmath18 decay promptly one more neutrino generated in cascade decay decay channel difficult channels lepton @xmath19 or @xmath20 small branching ratios one detected finial state measurement difficult extra photon leptonic decays radiative pure leptonic decays escape suppression@xcite extra photon identify decaying pseudoscalar meson @xmath12 experiment advantages one more particle detected detectorradiative corrections suppressed by electromagnetic coupling constant @xmath21 not suppressed by helicity suppression radiative decay may be larger than pure leptonic decays@xcite problem to increase accuracy of theoretical calculation first order radiative corrections emerges radiative pure leptonic decays have infrared divergences canceled with loop corrections existing calculation of radiative decays@xcite part ignored include radiative corrections leptonic paper interested in considering radiative decays pure leptonic decays with one - loop radiative corrections together process @xmath16 suffer helicity supression large branching ratio loop correction(virtual photon ) should larger branching ratio can not be ignored paper organized in section ii present calculations of radiative leptonic contributions decays decays into three family leptons with real photon fig.2 virtual photon corrections to pure leptonic decays photon in loop figs.3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 evaluate values of decays dependence of results on parameters model discussed preliminary conclusion obtained start with radiative decaycontributions to four diagrams in fig.2 constituent quark model formulated by bethe - salpeter equation amplitude four terms @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24\epsilon\lambda\times @xmath25 @xmath26\left @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 bethe - salpeter wave function of meson @xmath12 @xmath33 momentum @xmath12 @xmath34 polarization vector momentum of emitted photon quark model momenta of @xmath35-quarks inside meson are @xmath36 @xmath37 relative momentum of two quarks inside @xmath12 meson meson nonrelativistic bound state higher order relativistic corrections may be computed precisely for @xmath38-wave state radiative decay corrections ignore @xmath37 dependence non - relativistic spin structure wave function meson @xmath12 @xmath39 state @xmath40 @xmath41 wave function origin connects to decay constant @xmath5 @xmath42 m mass @xmath12 meson unitary gauge weak bosons calculations amplitude simplified as @xmath43 @xmath44(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell} @xmath45 @xmath46}\varepsilon^{\alpha\mu\beta\nu}p\alpha\epsilon\beta}\gamma_{\nu}{-_^{2}}p\cdot{\epsilon}(m^{2}-p\cdot{k-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell } @xmath47 momentum charged lepton @xmath48 @xmath49 infrared infinity phase space integral matrix element soft photon limit infrared infinity cancelled by loop corrections pure leptonic decay @xmath50 eqs.(7 ) ( 8) infrared terms @xmath51(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{\ell} diagrams ( g ) ( h ) i ) ( j ) figs.3.3, 3.4 have suppression factor @xmath52 compare loop diagrams no infrared infinity four loop diagrams ignore contributions calculations dimensional regularization infrared ultraviolet divergences adopted on - mass - shell renormalization ultraviolet divergence used feynman gauge photon taken amplitude diagrams ( a ) b ) fig.3.1 written @xmath53}\right @xmath54 ( -\gamma_{\nu})(1-\gamma_{5})\nu @xmath55} @xmath56 ( -\gamma_{\nu})(1-\gamma{5}\nu} @xmath57 @xmath58 denote momenta loop neutrino terms have infrared infinity integrating loop momentum on - mass - shell subtraction terms vertex self - energy diagrams ( c ) d ) e ) f ) written @xmath59 @xmath60@xmath61. cancellation infrared divergenciesinfrared parts decay widths from interference self - energy vertex correction diagrams tree diagrams : @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 infrared interference box '' correction diagrams tree diagrams @xmath65 real photon emission : @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 small energy corresponds experimental resolution soft photon phase space emitting photon divided into soft hard part by @xmath68 @xmath20 dimensional parameter dimensional regularization adding real photon emission @xmath69 virtual photon corrections @xmath70 infrared divergences @xmath71 canceled @xmath20 dependence cancelled obtain pure leptonic widths for @xmath12 meson decays three families leptons accurate next'-order corrections infrared finite depend on experimental resolution @xmath68 show whole ' leptonic decay widths sum corresponding radiative decay widths pure leptonic decay widths with radiative corrections in table ( 1 ) radiative decay leptonic corrections width not depend on experimental resolution soft photonvalues parameters @xmath72 gev gev gev@xcite resolutions prediction radiative decay widths @xmath78 close to ref@xcite @xmath80 smaller than@xcite smaller cut @xmath81 obtained @xmath82 larger decay widths depend on @xmath83 change branching ratios not much @xmath81 table ( 5 ) ( 6 ) @xmath84 difficult to obtain small @xmath81 experiment best radiative decay channel @xmath88 photon spectrum radiative decays in fig.4 fig.5 widths sensitive to decay constant @xmath5 values quark masses @xmath89 @xmath90.abada et al . . b*376 * 1992 ) 172 c.r.allton et al . collaboration nucl . b(proc suppl.)*34 * 1993 ) 465 c.w.bernard et al phys . rev . d*49 * 1994 ) 2536 gustavo burdman t.goldman daniel wyler phys . rev . d*51 * 1995 ) 111 d.arwood g.eilam a.soni mod a11 1996 ) 1061.geng.lih wei - min zhang - ph/0012066 chang d l wang zong. rev.*60 1999 ) 114013 d.e.groom european physical journal*15 2000 ) c.r.allton ape collaboration nucl 34 1993 ) 456 | 0.494652 | 2,853 | 1,510 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,555 | the magnetic field of the cp star hd 14437 was discovered by glagolevskij et al .
( 1985 ) using the 6-m telescope of the special astrophysical observatory .
no polarity changes have been found during 2 years of observations .
a very long ( @xmath0 34 years ) period of rotation was proposed to explain the measurements . to check this hypothesis
, we made a new series of magnetic field observations for this star 10 years later with the 6-m telescope .
the polarity of the longitudinal magnetic field is still negative and has not shown any change during more than 10 years of observations .
we found the most probable periods to be several days .
it means that we have observed a star where the magnetic and rotation axes are inclined at a small angle , and the negative pole is not far from the line of sight . | hd 14437 is a poorly studied peculiar a star with a magnitude of @xmath1 , effective temperature @xmath2 ( glagolevskij , 1995 ) .
observations of the 1980s with the 6-m telescope showed a variability of the longitudinal magnetic field with an amplitude of about 2 kg and a constant negative sign .
the description of the observations and data reductions are presented by glagolevskij et al .
( 1985 ) in more details .
in this paper we present new observations of hd 14437 which were carried out in 199697 using the ccd detector ( chuntonov & glagolevskij , 1997 ) . we have observed the spectra of the star on the 6-m telescope with a spectral resolution @xmath3 .
the context nice ( knyazev & shergin , 1995 ) in the midas system was used .
the new and old observational data are presented in table [ observations ] ( jd 24446552445900 : with photographic plates , jd 2449555 and jd 2449556 : with the hydrogen lines magnetometer , from jd 2450000 on : with the ccd detector ) .
we have carried out the line identification using the vienna astrophysical line data base ( vald ) ( piskunov et al . , 1995 ) and moore s tables ( moore , 1945 ) . in view of determining the individual land factor of each spectral line used in our measurements
, we have identified the lines in the following spectral ranges : @xmath459556385 and @xmath444604680 .
si and cr are observed to be overabundant .
we have found an underabundance of o by the lack of the lines oi @xmath46155.97 , 6556.78 and 6158.18 which are usually strong at spectral class a2 .
we have determined the effective magnetic field using babcock s standard formula with the individual land factor @xmath5 for each line .
the measurements are given in table [ observations ] .
lr|lr jd 2400000&@xmath6,g&jd 2400000&@xmath6,g + 44655.208&@xmath7 & 50415.240&@xmath8 + 44656.308&@xmath9 & 50415.269&@xmath10 + 44659.188&@xmath11 & 50499.196&@xmath12 + 44660.196&@xmath13 & 50499.221&@xmath14 + 44860.541&@xmath15 & 50500.161&@xmath16 + 45303.354&@xmath17 & 50500.188&@xmath18 + 45303.362&@xmath19 & 50617.507&@xmath20 + 45476.541&@xmath21 & 50643.521&@xmath22 + 45900.493&@xmath23 & 50705.451&@xmath24 + 49555.472&@xmath25*&50706.410&@xmath26 + 49556.420&@xmath27*&50707.412&@xmath28 + 50413.523&@xmath29 & 50709.602&@xmath30 + 50414.125&@xmath31 & 50710.432&@xmath32 + 50415.217&@xmath33 & & + the effective magnetic field has preserved its sign for about ten years .
the suggestion about the long period of the star contradicts our data , because we have observed the longitudinal component of the magnetic field to undergo significant changes within a few days only .
so , we can draw the conclusion that the axis of rotation , the magnetic axis and the line of sight are inclined at small angles .
having the observational data of the effective magnetic field @xmath34 , we tried to find the rotational period of hd 14437 .
it has been determined by yurkevich s method in the interval of 0100 days .
we have found three groups of probable periods : 13 , 16 and 30 days .
the best fitted variability curve of @xmath34 was derived for the period of @xmath35 .
independently , a search for the period has been performed by mathys et al .
( 1997 ) on the basis of the surface field @xmath36 .
they have found three groups of probable periods : 15 , 30 and 350 days .
later , wade ( 1997 ) proposed another period , close to @xmath37 , which he has calculated using 100 points of hipparcos photometry .
the variability curve of the effective magnetic field for @xmath37 looks somewhat worse than for @xmath35 because of greater dispersion , nethertheless it remains quite acceptable . besides
, determination of the period by photometry , with a much larger number of homogeneous points , undoubtedly gives a more reliable result .
the @xmath34 phase diagram for @xmath38 is presented in figure [ curv26 ] .
we would like to thank v. g. elkin for his help in observations and discussions of the results , and g. wade for the information about the 26 days period of hipparcos photometry .
this work was partly supported by a rfbr grant 970216247 . | hd 14437 poorly studied star magnitude @xmath1 temperature @xmath2 glagolevskij 1995 ) observations 1980s 6-m telescope showed variability longitudinal magnetic field amplitude 2 kg constant negative sign description data reductions glagolevskij et al . 1985 ) new observations hd 14437 199697 ccd detector chuntonov glagolevskij 1997 ) observed spectra 6-m telescope spectral resolution @xmath3 context knyazev shergin 1995 ) midas system used new old data table [ observations ] jd 24446552445900 photographic plates jd 2449555 jd 2449556 hydrogen lines magnetometer jd 2450000 ccd detector line identification vienna astrophysical line data base piskunov 1995 moore s tables 1945 identified lines spectral ranges @xmath459556385 @xmath444604680 si cr overabundant underabundance o lack lines oi @xmath46155.97 6556.78 6158.18 strong spectral class a2 determined effective magnetic field babcock s standard formula individual land factor @xmath5 each line measurements table [ observations ] jd 2400000&@xmath6 44655.208@xmath7 50415.240 + 44656.308 50415.269 + 44659.188 50499.196 + 44660.196 50499.221 + 44860.541 50500.161 + 45303.354 50500.188 + 45303.362 50617.507 + 45476.541 50643.521 + 45900.493 50705.451 + 49555.472*&50706.410 + 49556.420*&50707.412 + 50413.523 50709.602 + 50414.125 50710.432 + 50415.217 effective magnetic field preserved sign ten years long period contradicts data longitudinal field changes few days axis rotation magnetic axis line of sight inclined small angles observational data magnetic field @xmath34 rotational period of hd 14437 determined yurkevich s method 0100 days found three probable periods 13 16 30 days best variability curve @xmath34 derived period @xmath35 search for period by mathys et al . 1997 ) surface field @xmath36found three groups probable periods 15 30 350 days wade 1997 proposed another period close to @xmath37 calculated using 100 points hipparcos photometry variability curve magnetic field @xmath37 worse @xmath35 greater dispersion remains acceptable determination period by photometry larger homogeneous points reliable result @xmath34 phase diagram @xmath38 presented figure [ curv26 v. g. elkin g. wade information 26 days period hipparcos photometry work supported rfbr grant 970216247 | 0.184016 | 1,197 | 625 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,556 | cluster number counts offer sensitive probes of the dark energy if and only if the _ evolution _ of the cluster mass versus observable relation(s ) is well calibrated .
we investigate the potential for internal calibration by demanding consistency in the counts as a function of the observable . in the context of a constant dark energy equation of state , known initial fluctuation amplitude expected from the cmb , universal underlying mass function , and an idealized selection , we find that the ambiguity from the normalization of the mass - observable relationships , or an extrapolation of external mass - observable determinations from higher masses , can be largely eliminated with a sufficiently deep survey , even allowing for an arbitrary evolution .
more generally , number counts as a function of both the redshift and the observable enable strong consistency tests on assumptions made in modelling the mass - observable relations and cosmology . | the number density of massive galaxy clusters is exponentially sensitive to the amplitude of initially gaussian density fluctuations and has long been recognized as a sensitive cosmological probe @xcite . in particular
, the evolution of the number counts above a given mass threshold can determine the properties of the dark energy that accelerates the expansion @xcite .
this potential can only be realized if , in addition to the cluster redshifts , the cluster masses themselves are known , at least statistically .
unfortunately the total mass is not a direct observable and must be inferred through scaling relations with , e.g. the sunyaev - zeldovich ( sz ) flux decrement , the @xmath0-ray flux or temperature , weak lensing shear , or optical velocity dispersion . indeed
the normalization of the mass - temperature relation is currently the leading source of ambiguity in interpreting the local cluster abundance ( e.g. @xcite ) .
it compromises dark energy constraints if the cluster mass selection can not be defined to a few percent in mass @xcite .
the mass - observable relation can potentially be calibrated within a survey itself if its effect on the number counts is not degenerate with the cosmology .
for example , with a single cut on the temperature , the survey itself can calibrate the mass - temperature normalization to better than the tens of percent that span the determinations in the current literature , if it does _ not _ evolve @xcite .
however this method fails if the relationship has uncertain evolution that mimics the cosmology @xcite .
because the number density of clusters as a function of mass has a fixed functional form given by cosmological simulations ( e.g. @xcite ) , cluster number counts as a function of the observable in principle have the ability to self - calibrate even an evolving mass - observable relation .
here we study the potential for internal calibration and consistency checks in idealized future cluster number count surveys .
the cosmological utility of cluster counts stems from the simulation - based prediction of their comoving differential number density as a function of mass @xcite , @xmath1\ , .
\label{eqn : massfun}\ ] ] here @xmath2 is the variance in the linear density field smoothed with a top hat that encloses @xmath3 at the mean matter density today @xmath4 .
the cosmological sensitivity comes from these quantities and the comoving volume element in a redshift slice and solid angle . to assess the sensitivity of counts to various cosmological and mass - observable scaling parameters @xmath5
, we employ the fisher matrix technique @xcite @xmath6 where the covariance matrix is given by @xmath7 the first term represents sample covariance in the volume @xmath8 from large - scale structure , calculated as described in @xcite , and the second term shot variance . here the number density in a bin @xmath9 is defined by the redshift interval @xmath10 around @xmath11 and a selection based on some observable quantity @xmath12 , such as the sz flux decrement .
note that sampling errors for the selections in the same redshift bin completely covary .
the fisher matrix is a local approximation to the covariance matrix of the parameters @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the covariance matrix from prior information .
the fisher matrix is evaluated around a fiducial choice of parameters .
for the cosmology , we take : the dark energy density @xmath15 , equation of state @xmath16 , physical matter density @xmath17 , physical baryon density @xmath18 , tilt @xmath19 , and the initial normalization of the curvature fluctuations @xmath20 at @xmath21 mpc@xmath22 @xcite ( more conventionally : @xmath23 , @xmath24 , or @xmath25 ) .
we will however work in a future context where the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) has constrained the high redshift universe parameters with 1@xmath26 errors of @xmath27 ( e.g. @xcite ) in a flat universe , leaving the dark energy parameters to be determined by the survey . for the mass - observable relation
, we take the form @xmath28 where @xmath29 and @xmath30 are dimensional constants and the normalization parameter @xmath31 is dimensionless .
we take the scaling parameters as the amplitudes of a piecewise constant form @xmath32 and @xmath33 .
specifically , given a variation @xmath34 and @xmath35 from the fiducial model , the true mass is related to the apparent mass as @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the pivot mass scale that defines a normalization point for possible external information .
this generalizes previous treatments which have assumed constant normalization @xcite and power law evolution @xcite . in the limit of small redshift bins
, these simpler cases can be recovered from our more general treatment by noting that under a re - parameterization of the space to the set @xmath38 , possibly of lower dimension , the covariance matrix transforms as @xmath39 the fisher matrix definition itself can be so viewed . in the usual approach ( e.g. @xcite ) , all of the clusters in a given redshift bin above a given observable threshold are simply binned together . clearly , allowing for arbitrary variations @xmath40
no cosmological information can be extracted .
however the data at a given redshift may be binned into several _
apparent _ mass bins based on the observable @xmath12 .
the additional information supplied by multiple bins allows for a breaking of the degeneracy . likewise ,
even if the normalization is fixed by detailed followup by @xmath0-ray or weak lensing measurements at some mass @xmath41 ( e.g. @xcite ) , an uncertain scaling index @xmath42 would again destroy the cosmological information with a single bin if @xmath43 .
multiple bins again in principle allow the cosmology and the mass - observable relations to be jointly determined .
= 3.25truein this treatment ignores intrinsic scatter in the mass - observable relation as well as measurement error in the observable .
more realistically the selection function is not sharp in mass but assuming its functional form is well characterized this does not substantially compromise the cosmological information @xcite . for definiteness ,
let us take a fiducial cluster survey with specifications similar to the planned south pole telescope ( spt ) survey for clusters with the sz effect : an area of 4000 deg@xmath44 survey and a sensitivity corresponding to a constant @xmath45 ( e.g. @xcite ) .
we divide the number counts into bins of redshift @xmath46 out to @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
this crude binning is sufficient to retain the cosmological information . for illustration purposes ,
we take a pivot mass scale of @xmath49 to reflect potential mass measurement followup on the high mass end .
let us first consider that simulations or mass followup with different observables have placed strong priors on the mass - observable normalization and scaling index @xmath50 . in this case ,
the division into mass bins yields nearly independent measurements of the dark energy for a consistency check . in fig .
[ fig : consistency ] , we illustrate the consistency check in the @xmath51 plane for individual mass bins of @xmath52 from @xmath53 .
although the strongest constraints do come from the lowest mass bin , as expected from the increasing rarity of massive clusters at high redshift , the first 6 bins show significant constraints on the dark energy .
this consistency test demonstrates that there is sufficient information in the mass binning to attempt some degree of self - calibration of the mass - observable relations .
let us next keep the scaling index fixed @xmath54 but allow the normalization @xmath55 to vary ( see fig .
[ fig : plotwl ] ) .
solid lines represent constraints with the 6 mass bins and dashed lines those with a single mass bin or mass threshold .
we first allow only a redshift - independent normalization factor @xmath56 .
as shown in @xcite , even a single mass bin is sufficient to calibrate the relation to good enough accuracy for dark energy constraints ( here @xmath57 ) .
we next employ a power law evolution in the normalization @xmath58 . here
errors on the dark energy parameters degrade substantially with a single mass bin @xcite , but much of the loss is recovered from the multiple binning . finally , we take a fully arbitrary evolution in the redshift bins , i.e. no constraint on the form of @xmath34 .
as expected , there is no constraint on the dark energy with a single mass bin , but with multiple bins interesting constraints on the dark energy can still be extracted .
the key here is that the dark energy evolution is assumed to be smooth and parameterized by two numbers and so can not compensate an arbitrary variation in the normalization evolution .
= 3.25truein figure [ fig : aerror ] ( top ) shows the errors on @xmath34 with roughly 10% constraints on the normalization in each redshift band out to @xmath59 .
note that the covariance between the bands is nearly complete so that the overall normalization is still only known to @xmath60 but that the evolution is highly constrained .
conversely , external information on the mass - observable normalization would have to be substantially better than @xmath61 to improve on the internal results . in the context of our fiducial cosmology ,
the critical prior assumption is that the initial amplitude of the fluctuations is fixed by the cmb .
otherwise what is constrained by the multiple mass bins is a degenerate combination of the initial amplitude and the mass - observable normalization .
we have so far assumed that the scaling index @xmath62 is known a priori but of course that too is part of the uncertain mass - observable relation .
allowing for arbitrary variations @xmath34 _ and _ @xmath35 destroys most of the information on the dark energy .
however in the less drastic cases of adding a constant @xmath63 to a constant @xmath64 for a two parameter model , the additional degradation @xmath65 is a negligible @xmath66 and of the addition of power law variation in @xmath62 , @xmath67 to power law variation in @xmath64 for a 4 parameter model , a factor of @xmath68 for a total of @xmath69 .
another interesting case to consider is if some independent mass calibration , say from weak lensing or @xmath0-ray temperature followup , normalizes the mass - observable relation on the high mass end .
extrapolation down to the survey mass limit can be dangerous due to the uncertain physics of low mass clusters .
for illustrative purposes , let us take this constraint as @xmath70 at the pivot mass of @xmath49 .
despite the constraint on the normalization , if we allow for arbitrary variations in the scaling index and retain only a threshold at @xmath71 , no constraint on the dark energy can be extracted . with multiple bins ,
the errors on @xmath72 are only degraded by a factor of 1.16 to @xmath73 for a completely arbitrary @xmath35 . furthermore the errors on @xmath63 shown in fig .
[ fig : aerror ] ( bottom ) are at the several percent level and would be of interest in studying cluster physics .
as in the case of classical cosmological tests for the dark energy involving standardized candles and rulers , e.g. supernovae and the peaks in the cmb power spectrum , cluster number count tests require a standardized mass based on observable quantities . we have demonstrated that consistency with the well - determined shape of the mass function from cosmological simulations can in principle be used to calibrate the survey internally .
two examples are a normalization that has an arbitrary evolution in redshift and a scaling from the more easily calibrated high mass end that has an arbitrary evolution in the index .
our study involves a number of idealizations that merit future study and so internal calibration is best viewed as a useful check on cross - calibration studies with detailed multi - wavelength followup ( e.g. @xcite ) and cosmological simulations .
the crucial assumptions are that the survey be sufficiently deep to explore a substantial dynamic range in the mass function , the underlying mass function is known given a cosmology , the mass - observable selection function is sharp compared with the binning , the mean mass - observable relation is power law in form , the high redshift normalization of the fluctuations is fixed by future cmb data , and the dark energy equation of state is constant . in the fiducial model , a depth comparable to that planned for the spt sz survey is sufficient to make self - calibration useful but note that the necessary mass limit scales roughly with the non - linear mass scale @xmath74 . that depends on the currently uncertain normalization and so
if the normalization is lower than our fiducial choice it may be beneficial to sacrifice survey width for depth .
while the mass function form is based on simulations and currently its scaling with cosmology is only known to the @xmath75 level @xcite , determination requires only the well - understood gravitational physics of the dark matter and is far more secure than simulation - based mass - observable relations . in any case
, this knowledge is a prerequisite for any cluster number count study of cosmology .
we have assumed a deterministic mass - observable relation that makes the selection function sharp in apparent mass .
gaussian scatter in this relation does not seriously compromise the cosmological information @xcite but long uncharacterized tails to low mass would , given the steep mass function .
likewise the cluster physics of preheating and cooling can enter into the low mass end to make the mass - observable relations deviate from a power law . here
the binning serves as a useful consistency test for the implicitly assumed cluster physics .
the required prior information on the initial normalization is within reach of the upcoming cmb satellite missions if the extent of reionization can be determined ( e.g. @xcite ) .
if not , binning still serves to constrain the evolution of the mass - observable relation but leaves a degeneracy between the overall normalization of the relations and the fluctuations which can be fixed , e.g. by cmb lensing , ly@xmath76 forest clustering or even local cluster abundance studies .
conversely , external calibration of the mass - observable relation at the percent level can determine the fluctuation normalization at a comparable level .
binning can then provide tests of the dark energy model assumptions @xcite or other cosmological priors .
it is especially valuable if redshifts are available only locally ( e.g. @xmath77 from current optical surveys ) . in summary , utilizing the extra information in counting clusters as a function of both the redshift and their observable properties allows for joint solutions to the mass - observable relations and cosmology , if they are both simple .
if not , it offers valuable internal consistency checks against overly simplistic assumptions . _ acknowledgments : _ i thank z. haiman , a.v .
kravtsov , j.j .
mohr , c. pryke and the chicago thunch group for useful conversations and j. valdes for * nix expertise in file recovery .
wh is supported by nasa nag5 - 10840 and the doe oji program .
evrard , astrophys .
j , * 341 * , l71 ( 1989 ) ; c.s .
frenk , s.d.m .
white , g. efstathiou , m. davis , ibid , * 351 * , 10 ( 1990 ) ; j.p .
henry , m. arnaud , ibid , * 372 * , 410 ( 1991 ) ; p.b .
lilje , ibid , * 386 * , l33 ( 1992 ) ; n.a . bahcall , r.y .
cen , ibid , * 565 * , l5 ( 1992 ) . | number density of massive galaxy clusters sensitive to gaussian density fluctuations recognized as sensitive cosmological probe evolution of number counts above mass threshold can determine properties dark energy expansion potential if cluster cluster masses known total mass not direct observable inferred through scaling relations with sunyaev - zeldovich flux decrement-ray flux temperature weak lensing shear optical velocity dispersion normalization of mass - temperature relation leading source of ambiguity in interpreting local cluster abundance compromises dark energy constraints if cluster mass selection defined to few percent in mass mass - observable relation can be calibrated within survey if effect on number counts not degenerate with cosmology single cut on temperature survey can calibrate mass - temperature normalization to than tens of percent if method fails if relationship uncertain evolution cosmology number density of clusters as function of mass fixed functional form simulations cluster number counts self - calibrate evolving mass - observable relation study potential for internal calibration consistency checks in future cluster number count surveyscosmological utility cluster counts from simulation prediction differential number density function mass @xmath2 variance in linear density field @xmath3 mean matter density @xmath4 cosmological sensitivity from quantities volume element in redshift slice solid angle assess counts to cosmological mass - scaling parameters fisher matrix technique covariance matrix by @xmath7 first term sample covariance volume @xmath8 from large - scale structure second term shot variance number density in bin @xmath9 defined by redshift interval @xmath10 around @xmath11 selection based on observable quantity @xmath12 sampling errors for selections redshift bin covary fisher matrix local approximation to covariance matrix parameters @xmath13 @xmath14 covariance matrix from prior information fisher matrix evaluated around fiducial choice of parameters cosmology dark energy density @xmath15 equation of state @xmath16 physical matter density physical baryon density tilt @xmath19 initial normalization curvature fluctuations @xmath23work future context cosmic microwave background high redshift universe parameters@xmath26 errors @xmath27 flat universe dark energy parameters determined by survey mass - observable relation form @xmath28 @xmath29 dimensional constants normalization parameter @xmath31 dimensionless scaling parameters amplitudes of piecewise constant form @xmath32 @xmath33 variation @xmath34 @xmath35 from fiducial model true mass related to apparent mass @xmath36 @xmath37 pivot mass scale normalization point external information generalizes previous treatments constant normalization @xcite power law evolution small redshift bins simpler cases recovered re - parameterization space @xmath38 covariance matrix transforms as @xmath39 fisher matrix definition usual approach clusters in redshift bin above observable threshold binned together arbitrary variations @xmath40 no cosmological information extracted data redshift binned into several mass bins based observable @xmath12 additional information multiple bins allows breaking degeneracy normalization fixed by detailed followup @xmath0-ray weak lensing measurements at mass @xmath41@xcite uncertain scaling index @xmath42 cosmological information single bin @xmath43 multiple bins allow cosmology mass - observable relations jointly determined treatment ignores scatter mass - observable relation measurement error selection function not sharp in mass functional form compromise cosmological information fiducial cluster survey specifications similar south pole telescope survey area 4000 deg@xmath44 survey sensitivity constant @xmath45 divide number counts into bins redshift @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 crude binning sufficient retain cosmological information pivot mass scale of @xmath49 potential mass measurement followup high mass end simulations mass followup different observables strong priors on mass - observable normalization scaling index @xmath50 division into mass bins yields independent measurements dark energy for consistency check fig . consistency consistency check in @xmath51 plane for mass bins @xmath52 from @xmath53 strongest constraints from lowest mass bin first 6 bins show significant constraints on dark energy consistency test sufficient information in mass binning self - calibration mass - observable relationskeep scaling index fixed @xmath54 allow normalization @xmath55 vary fig solid lines represent constraints with 6 mass bins dashed lines single mass bin allow redshift - independent normalization factor @xmath56 single mass bin sufficient relation for dark energy constraints @xmath57 employ power law evolution in normalization @xmath58 errors dark energy parameters degrade with single mass bin @xcite loss recovered from multiple binning fully arbitrary evolution in redshift bins no constraint on form @xmath34 no constraint on dark energy with single mass bin multiple bins constraints dark energy can be extracted dark energy evolution smooth parameterized by two numbers not compensate arbitrary variation normalization evolution figure shows errors on @xmath34 10% constraints on normalization each redshift band to @xmath59 covariance between bands nearly complete overall normalization known to @xmath60 evolution highly constrained external information on mass - observable normalization better than @xmath61 to improve internal results initial amplitude fluctuations fixed by cmb constrained by multiple mass bins combination initial amplitude mass - observable normalizationassumed scaling index @xmath62 known part of uncertain mass - observable relation allowing arbitrary variations @xmath34 @xmath35 destroys information dark energy adding constant @xmath63 to @xmath64 two parameter model additional degradation @xmath65 negligible @xmath66 addition of power law variation @xmath62 @xmath67 to @xmath64 4 parameter model factor of @xmath68 total @xmath69 independent mass calibration weak lensing-ray temperature followup normalizes mass - observable relation high mass end extrapolation to survey mass limit dangerous due uncertain physics of low mass clusters constraint as @xmath70 at pivot mass of @xmath49 despite constraint allow arbitrary variations in scaling index retain threshold at @xmath71 no constraint on dark energy multiple bins errors on @xmath72 degraded by factor 1.16 to @xmath73 for arbitrary @xmath35 errors on @xmath63 in fig . several percent level interest in studying cluster physics cluster number count tests require standardized mass based observable quantitiesdemonstrated consistency with mass function from cosmological simulations calibrate survey examples are normalization arbitrary evolution in redshift scaling from high mass end arbitrary evolution in index study involves idealizations future study internal calibration on cross - calibration studies with multi - wavelength followup cosmological simulations assumptions survey deep dynamic range mass function underlying mass function known mass - selection function sharp mean mass - observable relation power law in high redshift normalization fixed by future cmb data dark energy equation of constant fiducial model depth comparable to spt sz survey sufficient self - calibration necessary mass limit scales with non - linear mass scale @xmath74 depends on uncertain normalization if lower sacrifice survey width for depth mass function form based on simulations scaling with cosmology known to @xmath75 level @xcite determination requires gravitational physics of dark matter more secure than simulation relations knowledge prerequisite for cluster number count study of cosmology assumed deterministic mass - observable relation selection function sharp in mass gaussian scatter compromise cosmological information @xcite long uncharacterized tails to low mass wouldcluster physics preheating cooling low mass end relations deviate from power law binning consistency test for cluster physics prior information on initial normalization within reach cmb satellite missions if reionization determined @xcite if not binning evolution mass relation leaves degeneracy between normalization fluctuations fixed by cmb lensing forest clustering local cluster abundance studies external calibration mass relation percent level determine fluctuation normalization binning tests dark energy model assumptions @xcite cosmological priors valuable if redshifts available locally @xmath77 optical surveys utilizing extra information in counting clusters redshift observable properties allows joint solutions to mass - observable relations cosmology if if not offers consistency checks against simplistic assumptions z. haiman kravtsov j mohr c. pryke chicago thunch group for conversations j. valdes for expertise file recovery supported by nasa nag5 - 10840 doe oji program evrard astrophys . j 341 l71 ( 1989 ) frenk white efstathioudavis 351 * 10 ( 1990 ) j henry arnaud 372 410 ( 1991 ) lilje 386 * l33 ( 1992 ) bahcall cen * 565 * l5 ( 1992 ) | 0.574746 | 3,380 | 1,664 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,571 | in this paper we present a generating function approach to two counting problems in elementary quantum mechanics . the first is to find the total ways of distributing @xmath0 identical particles among @xmath1 different states .
the second is to find the degeneracies of energy levels in a quantum system with multiple degrees of freedom .
our approach provides an alternative to the methods in textbooks . | generating function ( gf ) is a terminology frequently used in combinatorial mathematics as a bridge between discrete mathematics and continuous analysis .
it functions like a clothesline on which we hang up a sequence of numbers for display @xcite .
a gf may have different aliases in different contexts , e.g. partition function in statistical physics @xcite and @xmath2-transform in signal analysis @xcite .
it can be used to find certain characteristics of a sequence like expectation value or standard deviation @xcite .
sometimes that will be much more efficient than a direct evaluation .
there are many ways to construct a gf for a sequence , the simplest of which is using power series . given @xmath3 ( @xmath4 )
, we may construct its gf as @xmath5 note that @xmath6 can take a continous value and @xmath7 is analytic with respect to @xmath6 , which may give us some computational power using techniques of derivation or integration .
the paper is organized as follows .
section ii shows how a gf can find the number of distinct ways of assigning @xmath0 identical bosons or fermions to @xmath1 different states .
section iii discusses the gf approach to find the degeneracies of energy levels of a harmonic oscillator and a confined free particle both in higher dimensions . in our discussion
, we follow the notation @xmath8\,f(t)$ ] used in ref .
@xcite to mean the coefficient of @xmath9 term in the power series expansion of @xmath7 .
for example , we have @xmath8\,\mathrm{e}^t=1/{n!}$ ] @xmath10 .
the problem of how many ways there are to distribute @xmath0 identical particles among @xmath1 different states lies at the heart of quantum statistics .
it determines the specific distribution function that identical particles obey , i.e. bose - einstein distribution for bosons and fermi - dirac distribution for fermions .
textbooks generally tackle the problem by a combinatorial method @xcite . here
we show how to solve it by a gf .
pauli s exclusion principle has that a quantum state can accommodate one fermion at most .
this makes the counting problem to be much easier than that of bosons .
the number is simply the binomial coefficient @xmath1 choose @xmath0 : @xmath11 we can do it in another way .
the occupation number for fermions is @xmath12 and @xmath13 only .
we thus associate each state with a gf @xmath14 .
it is obvious that the coefficient of term @xmath15 in the expansion of @xmath16 is exactly the total ways that we can pick out @xmath0 candidates from @xmath1 states : ( @xmath17 ) @xmath18 } f^m ( t ) & = & { [ t^n]}\,(1+t)^m\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{1}{n!}\,{[t^0]}\,\frac{\mathrm{d}^n}{\mathrm{d}x^n}\,(1+t)^m\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{1}{n!}\,{[t^0]}\,m(m-1)\cdots(m - n+1)(1+t)^{m - n}\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{m!}{n!\,(m - n)!}\nonumber\\ & = & { m \choose n}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the gf approach recovers the binomial coefficient @xmath1 choose @xmath0 .
furthermore , the approach can be easily adapted to the boson case
. there can be an arbitrary number of bosons in one quantum state in principle , i.e. the occupation number can be @xmath12,@xmath13,@xmath19,@xmath20 .
it is not easy to figure out a combinatorial method to find the total ways in this case . with the help of gf
, we now associate each quantum state with @xmath21 .
notice that @xmath22 has an explicit form when @xmath6 is within its region of convergence : @xmath23 just as what we have done for fermions , we multiply @xmath1 copies of @xmath22 together . as a result ,
the number of total ways to distribute @xmath0 bosons among @xmath1 different states is just the coefficient of term @xmath15 in the expansion of @xmath24 : @xmath18 } b^m ( t ) & = & { [ t^n]}\,\frac{1}{(1-t)^m}\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{1}{n!}\,{[t^0]}\,\frac{\mathrm{d}^n}{\mathrm{d}t^n}\,\frac{1}{(1-t)^m}\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{1}{n!}\,{[t^0]}\,(-m)(-m-1)\cdots(-m - n+1)\frac{(-1)^n}{(1-t)^{m+n}}\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{(n+m-1)!}{n!\,(m-1)!}\nonumber\\ & = & { n+m-1 \choose n}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is exactly the same as what is derived from a combinatorial method @xcite , but we are using techniques from calculus for continuous variables .
the gf approach also has an advantage when the occupation numbers are distributed in some random way , e.g. , @xmath13,@xmath19,@xmath25,@xmath20 .
energy levels are usually quantized in a quantum system . furthermore
, degeneracies often occur in a system with independent degrees of freedom . in this section
we employ the gf to count the degeneracies .
problem of this kind can be formulated as follows .
suppose the system hamiltonian @xmath26 can be written as @xmath27 where the subscripts @xmath28,@xmath29,@xmath30,@xmath20 represent independent degrees of freedom .
suppose further that the energy spectrum of @xmath31 is @xmath32 with degeneracies @xmath33 , @xmath34 .
since the degrees of freedom are independent , the schrdinger equation of the system is separable .
therefore , the energy spectrum of the system hamiltonian @xmath26 consists of all possible sums of @xmath35 .
the degeneracy of a certain energy level @xmath36 is then given by the total number of @xmath1-tuples @xcite @xmath37 that satisfy @xmath38 with @xmath1 being the total number of degrees of freedom .
now we associate each degree of freedom @xmath39 with a gf @xmath40 and multiply them together over all @xmath39 . as a result
, we obtain a polynomial @xcite of @xmath6 , whose coefficients give exactly the degeneracies we want . to be specific , the degeneracy of energy level @xmath36 is given by @xmath41}\,\prod_{\delta}g_{\delta}(t).\end{aligned}\ ] ] a harmonic oscillator ( ho ) is not only exactly soluble in both classical and quantum physics , but also of great physical relevance .
for example , the problem of finding the landau levels of an electron in a magnetic field reduces to finding energy levels of an equivalent ho .
a 1d ho has a simple structure of energy spectrum , whose levels are non - degenerate and equally spaced : @xmath42 consider now a 2d homogeneous ho with potential @xmath43 its energy spectrum can be solved in a planar polar coordinate system , noting that @xmath44 .
a much simpler way is to treat the 2d system as two uncoupled 1d hos .
consequently , the energy levels are determined by a couple of integers @xmath45 as @xmath46 where @xmath47 . for a given integer @xmath48
, there correspond @xmath49 different couples of quantum numbers @xmath45 , namely , @xmath50 , @xmath51 , @xmath20 , @xmath52 .
the degeneracy of energy level @xmath53 is therefore @xmath54
now we apply the gf approach to find the degeneracy .
subtracting the zero point energy @xmath55 from the spectrum of each 1d ho and setting @xmath56 , we obtain @xmath57 , @xmath58 .
then we associate each 1d ho with a gf @xmath59 which reduces to @xmath60 for @xmath61 . the degeneracy @xmath62 of energy level @xmath63 is therefore given by @xmath64}\,h_{\mathrm{1d}}^2(t)\nonumber\\ & = & { [ t^n]}\,\frac{1}{(1-t)^2}\nonumber\\ & = & { n+2 - 1 \choose n}\nonumber\\ & = & n+1,\end{aligned}\ ] ] using result from section ii - b .
we can go further to find the degeneracies of energy levels for a 3d homogeneous ho whose potential is @xmath65 it is straightforward to write down that @xmath66 and the corresponding degeneracy @xmath67}\,h_{\mathrm{1d}}^3(t)\nonumber\\ & = & { [ t^n]}\,\frac{1}{(1-t)^3}\nonumber\\ & = & { n+3 - 1 \choose n}\nonumber\\ & = & \frac12 ( n+1)(n+2).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the sequence of @xmath68 goes like @xmath13,@xmath69,@xmath70,@xmath71,@xmath72,@xmath73,@xmath20 , which is consistent with the results derived by solving in spherical coordinates .
it is not difficult to generalize above to the case of inhomogeneous hos , e.g. @xmath74 .
as long as the ratio @xmath75 is some rational number , we can always find appropriate gfs to calculate the degeneracies of the system energy levels .
consider first a 1d free particle confined to some region of length @xmath78 .
it has non - degenerate energy levels @xcite as @xmath79 in the following , we choose @xmath78 such that @xmath80 for simplicity .
accordingly , the levels @xmath81 have a gf as @xmath82 @xmath83 can be used to find the degeneracies of energy levels of a free particle confined in a square of @xmath84 or even a cube of @xmath85 .
finding the degeneracies in each case ( 1d , 2d and 3d ) is a basic problem in quantum mechanics . in solid state physics @xciteit
is also concerned with the density of states per unit energy @xmath86 . in two dimensions ,
the density of states @xmath87 is independent of the energy @xmath36 , whereas @xmath88 in 1d and @xmath89 in 3d .
textbooks @xcite usually derive the density of states by using a quasi - continuous approximation of the distribution of energy levels in @xmath90-space .
below we use @xmath83 to find the level degeneracies in 2d and 3d .
following eq .
( 9 ) , the degeneracies are @xmath94\,f_{\mathrm{1d}}^2(t),\\ d_{\mathrm{3d}}(e ) & = & [ t^e]\,f_{\mathrm{1d}}^3(t).\end{aligned}\ ] ] unfortunately , series like @xmath83 does not have a known explicit sum .
thanks to the advanced math softwares like mathematica , we can use a computer to perform the evaluation .
coefficientlist " function can extract the coefficients in the expansion of eqs . ( 20 - 22 ) .
then we are able to count the total number of states whose energies fall into the interval @xmath95 $ ] .
table [ degeneracies ] gives a detailed list of number of states within certain energy intervals for a 1d , 2d and 3d free particle , respectively .
the list plots of the number of states are further presented in fig .
[ density plot ] .
there are totally @xmath96 energy intervals and each interval has a length of @xmath97 . since the interval length is far more than the minimum separation between energy levels , the quasi - continuous approximation is valid and the plots will reflect approximately the dependence of density of states on the energy . a comparison between the discrete number of states and the continuous density of states
is made in fig .
[ density plot ] ( depicted as dots and solid lines , respectively ) .
it can be seen that the exact numbers of states derived by a gf approach comply well with @xmath98 , @xmath92 and @xmath89 .
herbert s. wilf , _ generatingfunctionology _ ( a k peters , ltd . , 2006 ) , 3rd ed .
see , for example , kerson huang , _ introduction to statistical physics _
( crc press , 2001 ) see , for example , alan v. oppenheim et al .
, _ signals and systems _
( prentice hall , 1996 ) , 2nd ed .
it is commonly used in probability theory .
see , for example , athanasios papoulis and s. unnikrishna pillai , _ probability , random variables and stochastic processes _ ( mcgraw - hill , 2002 ) , 4th ed .
david j. griffiths , _ introduction to quantum mechanics _
( benjamin cummings , 2004 ) , 2nd ed .
if an element @xmath99 in the tuple corresponds to a level of degeneracy @xmath100 , that tuple should be counted for @xmath100 times .
assume the energy levels are quantized so that their separations are multiples of some unit .
that is usually the case in a simple quantum system .
the spin degeneracies are excluded from the discussion .
see , for example , charles kittel , _ introduction to solid state physics _
( wiley , 2004 ) , 8th ed . | generating function gf in combinatorial mathematics bridge between discrete mathematics continuous analysis functions like clothesline sequence numbers display gf aliases contexts partition function statistical physics @xmath2-transform signal analysis used find characteristics sequence like expectation value standard deviation more efficient than direct evaluation ways construct gf for sequence simplest using power series @xmath3 construct gf as @xmath5 @xmath6 continous value @xmath7 analytic computational power derivation integration paper organized section ii shows gf ways assigning identical bosons fermions to @xmath1 states section iii discusses gf approach find degeneracies of energy levels of harmonic oscillator confined free particle higher dimensions notation @xmath8\,f(t)$ ] coefficient of @xmath9 term in power series expansion of @xmath7 @xmath8\^t=1/{n}$ ] @xmath10 problem of ways distribute @xmath0 identical particles among @xmath1 states quantum statistics determines specific distribution function bose - einstein distribution for bosons fermi - dirac distribution for fermionstextbooks tackle problem combinatorial method @xcite here we show solve by gf pauli s exclusion principle quantum state one fermion makes counting problem easier than bosons number is binomial coefficient @xmath1 choose @xmath0 : @xmath11 another way occupation number for fermions is @xmath12 and @xmath13 only associate each state with gf @xmath14 coefficient of term @xmath15 in expansion @xmath16 is total ways pick out @xmath0 candidates from @xmath1 states : ( @xmath17 ) @xmath18 } =)\nonumber\\{1} - n+1 gf approach recovers binomial coefficient @xmath1 choose @xmath0 approach adapted to boson case arbitrary number of bosons in one quantum state occupation number be @xmath12,@xmath13@xmath19,@xmath20 not easy to figure out combinatorial method to find total waysgf associate each quantum state with @xmath21 @xmath22 explicit form when @xmath6 within region convergence : @xmath23 multiply @xmath1 copies of @xmath22 ways distribute @xmath0 bosons among @xmath1 states coefficient of term @xmath15 expansion @xmath24 : @xmath18 } b^m ( t ) t^n]}\frac{1}{(1-t)^m}\nonumber\\\frac{1}{n!}[t^0]}\mathrm{d}^n}}t^n-t)^m}{1}{n}[t^0]}(-m)(-m-1)(-m - n+1)\frac{(-1)^n}{(1-t)^{m+n}}\frac{(n+m-1)!}(m-1)} n+m-1 n}{aligned same combinatorial method @xcite using techniques calculus for continuous variables gf approach advantage when occupation numbers distributed random @xmath13 energy levels quantized in quantum system degeneracies occur in system independent degrees freedom employ gf to count degeneracies problem formulatedsystem hamiltonian @xmath26 written as @xmath27 subscripts represent degrees freedom energy spectrum @xmath31 is @xmath32 degeneracies @xmath33 degrees freedom independent schrdinger equation separable energy spectrum @xmath26 sums of @xmath35 degeneracy energy level @xmath36 given by @xmath1-tuples @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath1 total degrees freedom associate each degree freedom @xmath39 with gf @xmath40 multiply over all @xmath39 obtain polynomial @xcite of @xmath6 coefficients give degeneracies degeneracy of energy level @xmath36 given by @xmath41\delta harmonic oscillator ho ) soluble in classical quantum physics physical relevance problem finding landau levels electron magnetic field reduces to energy levels equivalent ho 1d ho simple energy spectrum levels non - degenerate equally spaced 2d homogeneous ho with potential @xmath43 energy spectrum solved in planar polar coordinate system treat 2d system as two uncoupled 1d hosenergy levels determined by integers @xmath45 integer @xmath48 correspond quantum numbers @xmath45 degeneracy of energy level @xmath53 is @xmath54 apply gf approach find degeneracy subtracting zero point energy @xmath55 from spectrum 1d ho setting @xmath56 obtain @xmath57 @xmath58 associate each 1d ho with gf @xmath59 reduces to @xmath60 @xmath61 degeneracy @xmath62 of energy level @xmath63 given by @xmath64{1d}}^2(t)\nonumber\\ t^n-t)^2 n+2 - 1 result section ii - bfind degeneracies energy levels 3d homogeneous ho potential @xmath65 straightforward write @xmath66 degeneracy @xmath67\mathrm{1d}}^3(t)\nonumber\\ = { [ t^n]}\frac{1}{(1-t)^3}\nonumber\\ n+3 - 1 n}\frac12 ( n+1)(n+2).{aligned} sequence @xmath68 @xmath13@xmath69@xmath70@xmath71@xmath20 consistent with results solving spherical coordinates generalize inhomogeneous hos @xmath74 ratio @xmath75 rational number find appropriate gfs calculate degeneracies system energy levels consider 1d free particle length @xmath78 non - degenerate energy levels @xmath79 choose @xmath78 @xmath80 simplicity levels @xmath81 gf @xmath82 @xmath83 find degeneracies energy levels free particle square @xmath84 or cube @xmath85 finding degeneracies basic problem quantum mechanics solid state physics density of states per unit energy @xmath86 density states @xmath87 independent of energy @xmath36 @xmath88 1d @xmath89 3dtextbooks @xcite derive density states quasi - continuous approximation distribution energy levels @xmath90-space use @xmath83 find level degeneracies in 2d 3d eq . 9 degeneracies are @xmath94\mathrm{1d}}^2{3d}}(e{1d}}^3(t). series @xmath83 explicit sum advanced math softwares mathematica computer evaluation coefficientlist function coefficients expansion eqs 20 - 22 ) count total number states energies interval @xmath95 table [ degeneracies ] detailed list number states energy intervals 1d 2d 3d free particle list plots number states presented in fig . [ density plot ] @xmath96 energy intervals each interval length @xmath97 interval length more than minimum separation energy levels quasi - continuous approximation valid plots reflect density states on energy comparison discrete number states continuous density in fig . [ density plot ] exact numbers states derived gf approach comply with @xmath98 @xmath92 @xmath89 herbert s. wilf generatingfunctionology k peters 2006 3rd edkerson huang introduction statistical physics crc press 2001 alan v. oppenheim signals systems prentice hall 1996 2nd ed used probability theory athanasios papoulis unnikrishna pillai probability random variables stochastic processes mcgraw - hill , 2002 4th ed david j. griffiths introduction quantum mechanics benjamin cummings , 2004 2nd ed element @xmath99 tuple corresponds degeneracy @xmath100 tuple counted @xmath100 times energy levels quantized separations multiples unit simple quantum system spin degeneracies excluded charles kittel introduction solid state physics wiley 2004 8th ed | 0.501878 | 3,135 | 1,625 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,572 | wave - wave interaction in plasmas is a topic of important research since the 16th century .
the formation of langmuir solitons through the coupling of high - frequency ( hf ) langmuir and low - frequency ( lf ) ion - acoustic waves , is one of the most interesting features in the context of turbulence in modern plasma physics .
moreover , quantum plasmas , which are ubiquitous in ultrasmall electronic devices , micromechanical systems as well as in dense astrophysical environments are a topic of current research . in the light of notable interests in such quantum plasmas , we present here a theoretical investigation on the nonlinear interaction of quantum langmuir waves ( qlws ) and quantum ion - acoustic waves ( qiaws ) , which are governed by the one - dimensional quantum zakharov equations ( qzes ) .
it is shown that a transition to spatiotemporal chaos ( stc ) occurs when the length scale of excitation of linear modes is larger than that of the most unstable ones .
such length scale is , however , to be larger ( compared to the classical one ) in presence of the quantum tunneling effect .
the latter induces strong qiaw emission leading to the occurrence of collision and fusion among the patterns at an earlier time than the classical case .
moreover , numerical simulation of the qzes reveals that many solitary patterns can be excited and saturated through the modulational instability ( mi ) of unstable harmonic modes . in a longer time , these solitons are seen to appear in the state of stc due to strong qiaw emission as well as by the collision and fusion in stochastic motion .
the energy in the system is thus strongly redistributed , which may switch on the onset of langmuir turbulence in quantum plasmas . | quantum zakharov equations ( qzes ) @xcite describe the nonlinear interaction of high - frequency ( hf ) quantum langmuir waves ( qlws ) and the low - frequency ( lf ) quantum ion - acoustic waves ( qiaws ) in quantum plasmas .
this set of equations basically extends the classical zakharov equations ( czes ) @xcite with higher - order dispersive terms associated with the bohm potential . unlike czes , qzes have been deduced using a quantum fluid model under the similar quasineutral assumption and the multiple time scale technique .
recently , much attention has been paid to investigate the dynamics of qzes in the context of e.g. , the formation of langmuir solitons through modulational instability ( mi ) as well as langmuir turbulence through the process of chaos ( see , e.g. , refs .
the statistical properties of the qzes have been analyzed using kinetic treatment and to show that the quantum coupling parameter ( @xmath0 ) can be responsible for reducing the mi growth rate @xcite .
the latter is , however , shown to be maximized in the limit of @xmath1 .
a variational approach was conducted to study the quantum effects on localized solitary structures @xcite .
moreover , some general periodic solution using lie point symmetries @xcite , some exact solutions @xcite as well as both temporal @xcite and spatiotemporal dynamics @xcite in the context of chaos and langmuir turbulence of the qzes have been investigated in the recent past .
furthermore , a comprehensive work on the dynamics of langmuir wave packets in three spatial dimensions @xcite as well as some investigations on arrest of langmuir wave collapse @xcite by the quantum effects can be found in the recent works .
notice that when the wave electric field is strong such that it approaches the decay instability threshold , the interaction of qlws and the qiaws is said to be in ` weak turbulence ' , and then qlws are essentially scattered off qiaws . on the other hand , when the electric field intensity is so strong that the mi threshold is exceeded , the interaction results in ` strong turbulence ' regime in which qlws are typically trapped by the density cavities associated with the qiaws .
such phenomena can frequently occur in plasmas .
moreover , the transfer of energy to few stronger modes with small spatial scales can take place due to a chaotic process , and this energy transfer can be faster when the chaotic process in a subsystem of the qzes is well developed @xcite . in the present work , we will investigate the full qzes numerically especially when the wave number of modulation is small enough from its critical value .
the latter , in turn , excites many unstable harmonic modes which in a longer time collide and fuse into fewer new incoherent patterns due to qiaw emission .
we will show that since the critical wave number of modulation ( below which the mi sets in ) depends on the quantum coupling parameter @xmath2 the length scale of excitation for the transition from temporal chaos ( tc ) to spatiotemporal chaos ( stc ) is to be larger than the classical case .
moreover , lower the values of @xmath3 , the higher is the number of unstable harmonic modes .
furthermore , we will show that the solitary waves thus formed due to mi will lose their strength after a long time through random collision and fusion among the patterns under strong qiaw emission .
this process becomes quicker whenever the density correlation due to quantum fluctuation becomes strong with higher values of the quantum parameter @xmath0 .
the stc state is then said to emerge , and the energy of the system is thus redistributed to new incoherent patterns as well as to few stronger modes with small length scales .
the nonlinear interaction of qlws and qiaws is described by the following one - dimensional qzes @xcite .
@xmath4@xmath5 where @xmath6 is the slowly varying wave envelope of the hf electric field and @xmath7 is the lf plasma density perturbation due to qiaw fluctuation .
also , @xmath8which is associated with the bohm potential , represents the ratio of the ion plasmon energy to the electron thermal energy . here
@xmath9 is the scaled planck s constant , @xmath10 is the boltzmann constant , @xmath11 is the electron temperature and @xmath12 is the ion ( electron ) plasma frequency with @xmath13 denoting the constant background density and @xmath14 the ion ( electron ) mass .
the electric field @xmath15 is normalized by @xmath16 , the density @xmath17 by @xmath18 .
moreover , the space and time variables are rescaled by @xmath19 and @xmath20 , where @xmath21 is the electron debye length .
note that by disregarding the term @xmath22 in eqs .
( [ 1 ] ) and ( [ 2 ] ) , one recovers the well - known czes @xcite .
the latter have been widely studied in the context of solitons , chaos and langmuir turbulence in many areas of plasma physics ( see , e.g. , refs .
it is thus of natural interest to investigate the qzes in the quantum realm , which may be useful for understanding the onset of plasma wave turbulence at nanoscales in both laboratory and astrophysical plasmas .
the growth rate of mi can be obtained from eqs .
( [ 1 ] ) and ( [ 2 ] ) by assuming the perturbations of the form exp@xmath23 from a spatially homogeneous pump electric field @xmath24 as @xcite @xmath25 ^{1/2 } , \label{3}%\ ] ] where @xmath26 and @xmath27 it can be shown that the growth rate is maximum at @xmath1 and decreases for increasing values of @xmath0 with cut - offs at lower wave numbers of modulation @xcite . in order to solve numerically the eqs . ( [ 1 ] ) and ( [ 2 ] ) we choose the following initial condition @xcite @xmath28 , \text { } n(x,0)=-\sqrt{2}% e_{0}k\beta\cos(kx ) , \label{4}%\ ] ] where @xmath24 is the amplitude of the pump langmuir wave field and @xmath29 is a constant of the order of @xmath30 to emphasize that the perturbation is very small .
we use runge - kutta scheme with time step size @xmath31 and consider the grid size @xmath32 so that @xmath33 corresponds to the grid position @xmath34 .
the spatial derivatives are approximated with centered second - order difference approximations .
the results are presented in figs . 1 - 6 after the end of the simulation with @xmath35 and @xmath36 ( upper panel ) and the associated density fluctuation @xmath37 ( lower panel ) with respect to the space @xmath38 after time @xmath35 in the numerical simulation of the qzes for @xmath39 , @xmath1 and @xmath40.,width=288,height=288 ] constant corresponding to the evolution as in fig
this shows that pattern selection leads to many solitary patterns which due to qiaw emission collide and get fused into few incoherent patterns after a long time .
the stc state emerges .
, width=288,height=288 ] note that as above the mi sets in for wave numbers satisfying @xmath41 where @xmath42 is a real root of the cubic @xmath43 and @xmath44 defines the curve along which pitchfork bifurcation takes place .
moreover , the dynamics is subsonic in the regime @xmath45 where the mi growth rate is small .
as @xmath46 is lowered from @xmath47 many unstable modes with higher harmonic modes will be excited . again
, the master mode can , in principle , result in the excitation of @xmath48 unstable harmonic modes where @xmath49 $ ] with @xmath50 there may also exist many solitary patterns with spatially modulated length @xmath51 where @xmath52 is for master mode ( @xmath53 ) and @xmath54 are for the unstable harmonic modes . as a result
, the envelope @xmath15 can be expressed as : @xmath55 @xmath56 in which the first term on the right - side of eq .
( [ 5 ] ) comes from the master mode and unstable harmonic modes with @xmath57 being due to pattern selection , whereas the second term is due to the nonlinear interaction among the patterns formed .
, @xmath58 and other parameters remain the same as in fig .
1.,width=288,height=288 ] constant with respect to space and time corresponding to the evolution as in fig .
this shows that pattern selection leads to many more solitary patterns than the classical case ( fig .
2 ) which due to qiaw emission collide and get fused into few incoherent patterns after a long time .
the collision is random and not confined between two patterns .
few stable modes are also excited .
the system energy is then redistributed to new incoherent patterns and few stable modes with small length scales .
the system is in the state of stc.,width=288,height=288 ] the profiles of the electric field and the density fluctuation at the end of simulation are shown in fig.1 for @xmath39 and @xmath1 .
we observe an excited electric field of the order @xmath59 highly correlated with density depletion @xmath60 or @xmath61 from fig .
2 , we find that many solitary patterns are formed from the master mode and unstable harmonic modes by means of pattern selection .
two solitary patterns initially peaked in @xmath62 collide to form a new mode which again collides with the master pattern peaked at @xmath63 and fuses into a new strong mode .
after few more other collisions and fusions , there remain only four distorted patterns . the system is then said to emerge the stc state . when @xmath46 is further lowered many solitary trains
are excited and saturated .
as soon as the collisions and fusions among the solitary patterns take place and the new incoherent trains are formed under strong qiaw emission , these incoherent patterns then collide with some others repeatedly and finally there remain few incoherent patterns in stochastic motion with the greater part of the system energy .
meanwhile many stronger modes are also excited to share the energy .
these are shown in figs . 3 , 4 and figs . 5 , 6 for different values of @xmath0 : @xmath64 and @xmath65 respectively .
we observe that though the number of remaining modes are the same for both the cases , however , many more ( compared to fig .
6 ) solitary patterns are seen to form initially ( fig .
4 ) which later participate into the collisions and fusions under qiaw emission . moreover , the new incoherent patterns formed with the lapse of long time are more stronger as in fig .
6 than those in fig .
4 . furthermore , for higher values of @xmath0 ( fig .
6 ) the collisions and fusions take place at an earlier time than the case of lower @xmath0 ( fig.4 ) .
thus , a certain amount of energy which was initially distributed among many solitary waves , will now be transferred to a few incoherent patterns as well as to some stable higher harmonic modes with short wave lengths .
so , if initially there form many solitary pattern trains due to mi with different modulational lengths , collision and fusion among most them can lead to the stc state . there must exist a critical wavelength or wave number @xmath66 at which the transition from temporal chaos to stc takes place .
this value , in the quantum case ( @xmath67 ) is quite different from the classical one ( @xmath1 ) . for detail investigations readers
are referred to works , e.g. , in refs .
@xcite . .
other parameters remain the same as in fig .
3 . , width=288,height=288 ] constant with respect to space and time corresponding to the evolution as in fig . 5 . here
the pattern selection leads to many solitary patterns , but less than that in fig .
4 . though , the collision is random and not confined between two patterns , but they fuse into new incoherent patterns in a shorter time than the case of @xmath64 ( fig .
4 ) due to strong qiaw emission .
the system is also in the stc state.,width=288,height=288 ]
we have performed a simulation study of the qzes to show that many coherent solitary patterns can be excited and saturated through the mi of unstable harmonic modes by a modulation wave number of qlws .
it is observed that there exist critical values of @xmath46 for which the motion of the coherent solitary patterns is in the state of tc or in stc .
the transition from tc to stc occurs when @xmath68 for @xmath1 or , for @xmath69when @xmath70 it is shown that the dispersion due to quantum tunneling induces strong qiaw emission leading to collision and fusion among the patterns to occur at an earlier time than the classical case .
the collision and fusion among some trains take place and the new incoherent pattern trains are formed accompanying strong qiaw emission due to quantum effects . the stc state is then said to emerge . as a result ,
the system energy in the stc state is spatially redistributed in the process of pattern collision , fusion and distortion , which may switch on the onset of langmuir turbulence in quantum plasmas .
this work was prepared in honor of professor p. k. shukla s 60th birthday .
m gratefully acknowledges support from the kempe foundations , sweden . | quantum zakharov equations describe nonlinear interaction of high - frequency quantum langmuir waves low - ion - acoustic waves in quantum plasmas extends classical zakharov equations with higher - order dispersive terms bohm potential qzes deduced using quantum fluid model quasineutral assumption multiple time scale technique attention dynamics of qzes in formation of langmuir solitons through modulational instability langmuir turbulence through chaos statistical properties of qzes analyzed using kinetic treatment quantum coupling parameter @xmath0 ) reducing mi growth rate maximized in limit of @xmath1 variational approach quantum effects on localized solitary structures general periodic solution lie point symmetries exact solutions temporal spatiotemporal dynamics in context chaos langmuir turbulence of investigated comprehensive work on dynamics of langmuir wave packets in three spatial dimensions investigations arrest of langmuir wave collapse by quantum effects in recent workswave electric field strong approaches decay instability threshold interaction of qlws qiaws in weak turbulence qlws scattered off qiaws when electric field intensity strong mi threshold exceeded interaction results in strong turbulence qlws trapped by density cavities qiaws in plasmas transfer of energy to stronger modes with small spatial scales due to chaotic process faster when process in subsystem qzes developed @xcite investigate full qzes numerically when wave number of modulation small from critical value excites unstable harmonic modes collide fuse into fewer new incoherent patterns critical wave number of modulation depends on quantum coupling parameter @xmath2 length scale of excitation for transition from temporal to spatiotemporal chaos larger than lower values of @xmath3 higher number of unstable harmonic modes solitary waves formed due to mi lose strength through random collision fusion under strong qiaw emission process quicker density correlation due to quantum fluctuation strong with higher values of quantum parameter @xmath0stc state energy redistributed to incoherent patterns stronger modes small length scales nonlinear interaction of qlws qiaws described by one - dimensional qzes @xcite @xmath4@xmath5 @xmath6 varying wave envelope hf electric field @xmath7 lf plasma density perturbation due to qiaw fluctuation @xmath8which bohm potential ratio ion plasmon energy to electron thermal energy @xmath9 scaled planck s constant boltzmann constant electron temperature ion plasma frequency @xmath13 constant background density @xmath14 ion electron ) mass electric field @xmath15 normalized by @xmath16 density @xmath18 space time variables rescaled by @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 electron debye length disregarding term @xmath22 in recovers czes @xcite studied in solitons chaos langmuir turbulence plasma physics investigate qzes in quantum realm understanding onset plasma wave turbulence at nanoscales laboratory astrophysical plasmas growth rate of mi from eqs .1 2 ) assuming perturbations@xmath23 from homogeneous pump electric field @xmath24 @xcite @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 growth rate maximum at @xmath1 decreases increasing values @xmath0 cut - offs lower wave numbers modulation @xcite solve numerically eqs choose initial condition @xcite @xmath28{2} @xmath24 amplitude pump langmuir wave field @xmath29 constant order @xmath30 perturbation small use runge - kutta scheme with time step size @xmath31 consider grid size @xmath32 @xmath33 corresponds to grid position @xmath34 spatial derivatives approximated with centered second - order difference approximations results presented in figs . 1 - 6 after end simulation @xmath35 @xmath36 density fluctuation @xmath37 space @xmath38 time @xmath35 numerical simulation qzes for @xmath39 @xmath1 @xmath40=288,height=288 constant evolution pattern selection leads to solitary patterns into incoherent patterns stc state emergeswidth=288,height=288 mi sets for wave numbers @xmath41 @xmath42 root of cubic @xmath43 @xmath44 defines curve pitchfork bifurcation dynamics subsonic in regime @xmath45 mi growth rate small @xmath46 lowered from @xmath47 unstable modes higher harmonic modes excited master mode excitation @xmath48 unstable harmonic modes @xmath49 @xmath50 solitary patterns with spatially modulated length @xmath51 @xmath52 for master mode @xmath53 @xmath54 unstable harmonic modes envelope @xmath15 expressed as @xmath55 @xmath56 first term right - side from master mode unstable harmonic modes @xmath57 due to pattern selection second term to nonlinear interaction among patterns @xmath58 parameters same fig .=288,height=288 constant space time evolution pattern selection leads to solitary patterns emission collide into incoherent patterns collision random not few stable modes excited system energy redistributed to incoherent patterns stable modes small length scales system in state of stc.=288,height=288 profiles electric field density fluctuation simulation shown in fig.1 for @xmath39 and @xmath1 excited electric field @xmath59 correlated with density depletion @xmath60 or @xmath61 from fig . 2 solitary patterns formed from master mode unstable harmonic modes pattern selection two solitary patterns @xmath62 collide new mode collides with master pattern @xmath63 fuses into strong mode after collisions fusions four distorted patterns system stc state @xmath46 lowered solitary trains excited saturated collisions fusions new incoherent trains formed under strong qiaw emission incoherent patterns collide few incoherent patterns in stochastic motion with system energy stronger modes share energy shown in figs . 3, 4 5 , 6 for values @xmath0 @xmath64 @xmath65 number remaining modes same more solitary patterns form initially participate into collisions fusions under qiaw emission new incoherent patterns formed with long time more stronger in fig . 6 than 4 higher values of @xmath0collisions fusions earlier than lower @xmath0 ( fig.4 ) energy distributed among solitary waves transferred to incoherent patterns stable higher harmonic modes with short wave lengths if many solitary pattern trains different modulational lengths collision fusion can lead to stc state critical wavelength @xmath66 transition from chaos to stc value in quantum case ( @xmath67 ) different from classical ( @xmath1 ) detail investigations to works parameters same as in fig . 3 constant space time evolution as fig . 5 pattern selection leads to many solitary patterns less than fig . 4 collision random not fuse into new incoherent patterns shorter time than @xmath64 4 due to strong qiaw emission system in stc state simulation study many coherent solitary patterns be excited saturated through unstable harmonic modes by modulation wave number of qlws critical values of @xmath46 for motion of coherent solitary patterns in tc or stctransition from tc to stc occurs @xmath68 @xmath1 dispersion due to quantum tunneling induces qiaw emission to collision fusion patterns earlier collision fusion new incoherent pattern trains formed qiaw emission due quantum effects stc state system energy spatially redistributed in pattern collision fusion distortion switch on onset langmuir turbulence in quantum plasmas work prepared honor of professor p k shukla s 60th birthday support from kempe foundations sweden | 0.517727 | 2,982 | 1,512 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,578 | results by the babar and belle experiments of the measurements @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath2 along with the ckm matrix elements @xmath3 and @xmath4 are presented .
the babar and belle experiments @xmath5 results for @xmath1 are in good agreement with each other , comfortably establishing @xmath6 violation within @xmath7 decays .
however , there is a 3.5 standard deviation between this result and @xmath1 measured by the belle experiment using @xmath8 decays .
belle also find evidence for @xmath6 violation through time dependent measurements of the decay @xmath9 , whilst a tighter constraint has been placed on the unitarity angle @xmath10 by babar , using time dependent studies of the decay @xmath11 .
= 14.5pt | since the discovery of @xmath6 violation in 1964 @xcite , great effort has been placed in understanding the origin and mechanism of this asymmetry . in 1973 ,
kobayashi and maskawa proposed a model where @xmath6 violation is accommodated within the weak interaction as an irreducible complex phase in the quark mixing matrix @xcite .
today we refer to this as the ckm matrix and with three known fermion families it can be written as @xmath12 the unitary nature of the matrix implies there are six orthogonality conditions obtained by row - column multiplication with its inverse .
one of these conditions which is relevant to @xmath7 decays is : @xmath13 each orthogonality condition requires the sum of three complex numbers to be zero , and therefore can be represented geometrically in the complex plane as a triangle .
these are known as ` unitary triangles ' , and for the condition expressed in equation [ buni ] , we refer to the angles in the triangle as @xmath10 = @xmath14 , @xmath15 = @xmath16 and @xmath17 = @xmath14 .
two @xmath7-factories have been built , babar at slac usa and belle at kek japan , with the aim of measuring @xmath6 violation in the @xmath7 system and to constrain further the ckm matrix using information from @xmath7 meson decays .
we can write the time dependent amplitude of the @xmath18 state at @xmath19 = 0 decaying into a final state @xmath20 as @xmath21,\ ] ] where @xmath22 = @xmath23 is the amplitude of the @xmath18 decay to the final state @xmath20 , @xmath24 is the amplitude for @xmath25 and @xmath26 give the weak eigenstates @xmath27 in the ( @xmath18 , @xmath25 ) basis @xmath28 . the average between the h and l masses
is @xmath29 and the difference is @xmath30 , whilst we make the approximation @xmath31 .
when both @xmath18 and @xmath25 can decay to the same final state @xmath20 , @xmath6 violation can occur through the interference between mixing ( @xmath32 ) and the decay ( @xmath33 ) , even if @xmath6 is conserved in both @xmath34 .
pairs of @xmath7 mesons are generated at the @xmath35 resonance where the two mesons oscillate coherently between the @xmath18 and @xmath25 until one decays .
we consider the time interval @xmath36 between the decay of one @xmath7 flavor eigenstate ( or `` tag '' ) and the decay of the other @xmath7 to a @xmath6 eigenstate @xmath20 where the decay rate in terms of @xmath36 can be written as @xmath37 where @xmath38 and it is assumed @xmath39 and the @xmath40 sign represents the @xmath18(@xmath25 ) tag . in the @xmath35 center of mass frame the @xmath7 meson is nearly at rest , leading to a strong correlation between the reconstructed mass and the missing mass of the partner @xmath7 .
therefore the typical choice for an independent pair of kinematic variables is @xmath41 where the asterisk refers to the @xmath35 frame and the subscript @xmath7 denotes the reconstructed @xmath7 .
true @xmath7 decays tend to be peak at @xmath42 = 0 and @xmath43 = @xmath44 .
the tagged @xmath7 does not need to be fully reconstructed as the important information required is simply the decay vertex and whether it s a @xmath18 or @xmath25 .
the flavor of the tagged @xmath7 is determined by the sign of the charge in the ( @xmath45 ) , leading charged track .
the efficiency @xmath46 and the mistag fraction @xmath47 for each tagging algorithm is measured with fully reconstructed eigenstate decays .
the effective efficiency is given by @xmath48 , where the babar and belle experiments report average measured values of ( @xmath49)% and ( @xmath50)% respectively .
the decay rate as a function of @xmath36 is modified as a consequence of the tagging efficiency and also the convolution with the resolution function @xmath51 .
the resulting decay rate becomes @xmath52 where @xmath53 is the @xmath7 lifetime .
we look for asymmetries between @xmath18 and @xmath25 tagged events having a @xmath54 ) dependence with a known angular frequency @xmath30 and an amplitude that is given by @xmath55 multiplied by the dilution factor @xmath56 .
the interesting physics lies within @xmath55 as it contains the factor @xmath32 which is common to all decay modes . depending on the decay mode under study , it is @xmath55 which is measured to help provide information on @xmath10 , @xmath15 or @xmath57 .
considering decays @xmath60 ( @xmath58 or @xmath59 ) , the time dependent decay rate can be further written as @xmath61,\ ] ] where the @xmath6 violating asymmetry parameters @xmath62 and @xmath63 and @xmath64 will be used throughout the document with subscripts referring to the decay in question . ]
(= @xmath65 ) are expressed as @xmath63 = ( 1 @xmath66)/(1 + @xmath67 ) and @xmath62 = 2im@xmath68/(1 + @xmath67 ) , where @xmath68 is a parameter that depends on @xmath69 mixing and the amplitudes for @xmath18 and @xmath70 decaying to @xmath71 . if these decays proceed only via @xmath72 tree amplitudes , @xmath73 and @xmath74
. if there are penguin contributions to the amplitude then @xmath62 = @xmath75 and @xmath76 .
a limit on the difference between @xmath10 and @xmath77 can be set using the grossman - quinn bound @xcite which is @xmath78 where @xmath79 is the branching fraction of @xmath80 and @xmath81 is the branching fraction of @xmath82 .
based on a dataset of 81 fb@xmath83 and 140 fb@xmath83 used by the babar and belle experiments respectively , the results in table [ tab : pipi ] where obtained for the decay @xmath9 .
._babar and belle measurements of the @xmath6 violating parameters @xmath84 and @xmath85_. [ cols="^,^,^ " , ]
given the semileptonic decay @xmath86 one can reconstruct the neutrino where then it is possible to measure the hadronic mass @xmath87 @xcite . in the case where @xmath88 the hadronic mass is greater than or equal to the mass of the @xmath89 meson .
however when @xmath90 the hadronic mass distribution extends below the @xmath89 meson mass such that a cut @xmath91 significantly enhances the relative contribution @xmath72 compared to @xmath92 . a measurement of the rate can then be used directly to measure @xmath3 or @xmath4 .
this approach was first used by cleo @xcite and is now being used by babar @xcite and belle @xcite .
we can study the moments of the invariant mass distributions , @xmath93 and @xmath94 where the moments are extracted directly from the measured @xmath87 and @xmath95 distributions directly , taking into account corrections for mass scales , the detector efficiency and small residual backgrounds .
theoretical calculations of the second moment @xmath94 have been performed using an operator product expansion ( ope ) in powers of the strong coupling constant @xmath96 and @xmath97 up to the order of @xmath98 . a review on this subject
can be found here @xcite .
combining measurements of @xmath94 for values of the momentum threshold with other measurements of semileptonic branching fractions and @xmath7 lifetimes we can further constrain the @xmath99 quark mass , @xmath100 in the kinematic mass scheme @xcite and the ckm matrix element @xmath101 @xcite .
based on a dataset of 82 fb@xmath83 corresponding to 89 million @xmath7 meson pairs the following results where obtained .
@xmath101 = ( 41.4 @xmath102 0.4@xmath103 @xmath102 0.4@xmath104 @xmath102 0.2@xmath105 @xmath102 0.6@xmath106 @xmath100 = 4.61 @xmath102 0.05@xmath103 @xmath102 0.04@xmath104 @xmath102 0.02@xmath105 gev / c@xmath107 where in both cases the first error is due to the experimental uncertainty of the measurement , the second is a consequence of heavy quark expansion ( hqe ) and the third is due to the uncertainty contribution from @xmath108 . for @xmath101
the last error is due to the uncertainty from the hqe of the semileptonic width @xmath109 .
babar use a data sample of 82 fb@xmath83 containing 89 million @xmath110 pairs . one @xmath7 is fully reconstructed and the other @xmath7 is analyzed for semileptonic decays .
for semileptonic decay candidates , a high momentum lepton is required such that @xmath111 1.0 gev / c .
all the reconstructed particles not associated with the fully reconstructed @xmath7 are used to calculate the missing four - momentum of the semileptonic decay . this missing four - momentum
is taken as being the neutrino four - momentum .
a kinematic fit is performed on the event to determine @xmath87 .
additional cuts are then applied to improve the quality of events , such as requiring the invariant mass of the neutrino to be small in order to improve the @xmath87 resolution .
a fit is performed on the @xmath87 distribution whereby the region @xmath112 1.55 gev / c@xmath107 is dominated by @xmath113 and is used to fix the scale for the @xmath92 distribution in @xmath87 .
the number of @xmath114 events below @xmath115 1.55 gev / c@xmath107 is then extracted from the fit from which they calculate : @xmath116 = ( 4.62 @xmath102 0.28 @xmath102 0.27 @xmath102 0.40 @xmath102 0.26 ) @xmath117 where the first error is statistical , the second is systematic , the third is due to the error on @xmath114 modeling and the fourth is due to the error on the known relationship between the rate and @xmath116 .
belle follow a similar procedure to that descried above .
they require one fully reconstructed @xmath7 in the events and look for the other @xmath7 to decay semileptonically . with the knowledge of which particles belong to the fully reconstructed @xmath7 and which belong to the semileptonic decay , the values for @xmath87 and @xmath118 ( mass of the virtual @xmath119 squared ) are calculated .
candidates are required to have @xmath120 1.5 gev / c@xmath107 and @xmath121 7 gev / c@xmath107 .
the @xmath92 events are subtracted and from the @xmath114 events in the @xmath87 distribution they find @xmath116 = ( 4.66 @xmath102 0.28 @xmath102 0.35 @xmath102 0.58 @xmath102 0.17 @xmath102 0.08 ) @xmath117 where the first error is statistical , the second is systematic , the third is theoretical and the fourth and fifth errors are due to @xmath92 and @xmath72 modeling respectively .
babar and belle have established @xmath6 violation in @xmath18 decays through the measurement of @xmath122 , where the constraint on the ckm unitarity triangle is shown in figure [ fig : tri ] .
this @xmath6 asymmetry is well accommodated within the standard model , however we are starting to see evidence for inconsistencies from charmless decays .
also , @xmath6 violation in the decay @xmath9 has been reported by belle , though not yet confirmed by babar .
we look forward to additional data which will provide definitive results regarding these measurement , helping to further constrain the angles @xmath10 and @xmath17 and with the help of theorists provide more precise measurements of the ckm elements @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
i am extremely grateful to the organizers of the conference and would like to thank them for providing an interesting and enlightening physics program .
it is also a pleasure to thank the babar and belle experiments for their achievements in obtaining high luminosity with which they have provided a wide range of physics results .
christenson _ et al _ , phys .
* 13 * , 138 ( 1964 ) .
m. kobayashi and t. maskawa , prog .
. phys . * 49 * , 652 ( 1973 ) .
y. grossman and h.r .
quinn , phys .
d * 58 * , 017504 ( 1998 ) .
m. benecke and m. neubert , hep - ph/0308039 ( 2003 ) .
i.dunietz , phys . lett .
b * 427 * , 179 ( 1998 ) .
l. wolfenstein , phys .
lett . * 51 * , 1945 ( 1983 ) .
d. cronin - hennessy _ et al _ ( cleo collaboration ) , phys .
rev . lett . *
87 * , 251808 ( 2001 ) .
scott e. roberts , ph.d thesis , univ . of rochester ( 1997 ) .
b. aubert _ et al _ ( babar collaboration ) , hep - ph/0307062 . h. kakuno ( belle collaboration ) , cipanp2003 .
n. uraltsev , hep - ph/0409125 ( 2004 ) .
i. i. bigi , m. shiffman , n. uraltsev and a. vainshtein , phys .
d * 56 * , 4017 ( 1997 ) .
p. gambino and n. uraltsev , eur .
j. c * 34 * , 181 ( 2004 ) . | discovery @xmath6 violation 1964 effort understanding origin mechanism asymmetry 1973 kobayashi maskawa proposed model @xmath6 violation weak interaction irreducible complex phase quark mixing matrix refer ckm matrix three fermion families written as @xmath12 unitary nature matrix implies six orthogonality conditions row - column multiplication inverse relevant @xmath7 decays @xmath13 orthogonality condition requires sum three complex numbers zero represented triangle known unitary triangles condition expressed equation refer angles triangle @xmath10 = @xmath14 @xmath15 = @xmath16 @xmath17 = @xmath14 two @xmath7-factories built measuring @xmath6 violation @xmath7 system constrain ckm matrix information @xmath7 meson decays write time dependent amplitude @xmath18 state @xmath19 = 0 decaying final state as @xmath21 @xmath22 = @xmath23 amplitude @xmath18 decay final state @xmath24 amplitude @xmath25 @xmath26 weak eigenstates @xmath27 basis average between h l masses @xmath29 difference @xmath30 approximation @xmath31 .@xmath18 @xmath25 decay final state @xmath6 violation interference mixing decay @xmath6 conserved in @xmath34 @xmath7 mesons generated at @xmath35 resonance oscillate between @xmath18 @xmath25 until one decays time interval between decay @xmath7 eigenstate decay rate @xmath36 written as @xmath37 @xmath40 sign represents @xmath18(@xmath25 tag @xmath35 center mass frame @xmath7 meson nearly at rest strong correlation between reconstructed mass missing mass @xmath7 typical choice for independent kinematic variables @xmath41 asterisk refers @xmath35 frame subscript @xmath7 denotes reconstructed @xmath7 @xmath7 decays peak at @xmath42 = 0 = @xmath44 tagged @xmath7 reconstructed decay vertex @xmath18 or @xmath25 flavor of tagged @xmath7 determined by sign of charge in @xmath45 track efficiency @xmath46 mistag fraction @xmath47 for each tagging algorithm measured with reconstructed eigenstate decaysefficiency by @xmath48 babar belle experiments report values @xmath49) @xmath50)% decay rate @xmath36 modified tagging efficiency convolution with resolution function @xmath51 decay rate becomes @xmath52 @xmath53 is @xmath7 lifetime asymmetries between @xmath18 @xmath25 events @xmath54 dependence angular frequency @xmath30 amplitude by @xmath55 multiplied by dilution factor @xmath56 @xmath55 factor @xmath32 common to decay modes @xmath55 measured information on @xmath10 @xmath57 decays time dependent decay rate as @xmath61 @xmath6 violating asymmetry parameters @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 used decay as @xmath63 = @xmath66)/(1 + @xmath67 @xmath62 =@xmath68/(1 + @xmath67 on @xmath69 mixing amplitudes for @xmath18 @xmath70 decaying to @xmath71 decays proceed via @xmath72 amplitudes @xmath73 @xmath74 penguin contributions @xmath62 = @xmath75 @xmath76limit difference @xmath10 @xmath77 set using grossman - quinn bound @xcite @xmath78 @xmath79 branching fraction @xmath80 @xmath82 dataset 81 fb@xmath83 140 fb@xmath83 babar belle experiments results table decay @xmath9 belle measurements @xmath6 violating parameters @xmath84 @xmath85 semileptonic decay @xmath86 reconstruct neutrino measure hadronic mass @xmath87 @xmath88 hadronic mass greater or equal mass @xmath89 meson @xmath90 hadronic mass distribution extends below @xmath89 meson mass cut @xmath91 enhances relative contribution @xmath72 @xmath92 measurement rate measure @xmath3 or @xmath4 approach used by cleo now babar belle study moments invariant mass distributions @xmath93 @xmath94 extracted from measured @xmath87 @xmath95 distributions corrections mass scales detector efficiency small residual backgrounds theoretical calculations second moment @xmath94 performed using operator product expansion powers strong coupling constant @xmath96 @xmath97 order @xmath98 review heremeasurements @xmath94 momentum threshold semileptonic branching fractions @xmath7 lifetimes constrain @xmath99 quark mass @xmath100 kinematic mass scheme @xcite ckm matrix element @xmath101 @xcite dataset 82 fb@xmath83 89 million @xmath7 meson pairs results obtained @xmath101 = 41.4 @xmath102 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.6@xmath106 @xmath100 = 4.61 @xmath102 0.05 0.04 0.02@xmath107 first error due experimental uncertainty second heavy quark expansion third uncertainty @xmath108 @xmath101 last error due uncertainty hqe semileptonic width @xmath109 data sample 82 fb@xmath83 89 million @xmath110 pairs one @xmath7 reconstructed other analyzed for semileptonic decays high momentum lepton required @xmath111 1.0 gev / c reconstructed particles calculate missing four - momentum semileptonic decay neutrino four - momentum kinematic fit performed determine @xmath87 additional cuts improve quality invariant mass neutrino small improve @xmath87 resolutionfit performed on @xmath87 distribution region @xmath112 1.55 gev / dominated by @xmath113 scale @xmath92 distribution @xmath114 events below @xmath115 1.55 gev / extracted from fit @xmath116 = ( 4.62 @xmath102 0.28 0.27 0.40 0.26 ) @xmath117 first error statistical second systematic third error @xmath114 modeling fourth error relationship rate @xmath116 belle procedure require one reconstructed @xmath7 other decay semileptonically particles decay values for @xmath87 @xmath118 calculated candidates @xmath120 1.5 gev / c@xmath107 @xmath121 7 gev / c@xmath107 @xmath92 events subtracted @xmath114 events @xmath116 = ( 4.66 @xmath102 0.28 0.35 0.58 0.17 0.08 ) @xmath117 first error statistical second systematic third theoretical fourth fifth errors due to @xmath92 @xmath72 modeling established @xmath6 violation in @xmath18 decays through measurement @xmath122 constraint on ckm unitarity triangle shown in figure@xmath6 asymmetry accommodated standard model evidence inconsistencies from charmless decays @xmath6 violation decay @xmath9 reported by belle not confirmed babar look forward additional data definitive results constrain angles @xmath10 @xmath17 precise measurements ckm elements @xmath3 @xmath4 grateful to organizers conference interesting enlightening program babar belle experiments high luminosity wide range physics results christenson et al phys . * 13 *, 138 ( 1964 ) kobayashi maskawa phys 49 652 ( 1973 ) grossman quinn phys 58 017504 ( 1998 ) benecke neubert hep - ph/0308039 ( 2003 ).dunietz phys . 427 179 ( 1998 ) wolfenstein phys 51 1945 ( 1983 ) cronin - hennessy cleo collaboration phys . 87 251808 ( 2001 ) scott roberts ph.d thesis univ . rochester ( 1997 ) aubert babar collaboration hep - ph/0307062 kakuno belle collaboration cipanp2003 uraltsev hep - ph/0409125 ( 2004 )bigi shiffman uraltsev vainshtein d * 56 * 4017 1997 ) gambino uraltsev * 34 181 2004 ) | 0.50397 | 3,321 | 1,775 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,582 | we have recently obtained deep near - ir keck imaging of a newly - discovered @xmath0 galaxy ( frye & broadhurst 1998 ) .
this is lensed by the rich foreground cluster abell 2390 ( @xmath1 ) into highly - magnified arcs
@xmath2 in length .
our @xmath3- and @xmath4-band keck / nirc imaging allows us to map the balmer@xmath5 break amplitude . in combination with high - quality archival hst / wfpc2 data
, we can spatially resolve stellar populations along the arcs .
the wfpc2 images clearly reveal several bright knots , which may correspond to sites of active star formation . indeed ,
in some spatial regions the keck / lris discovery spectra are consistent with ob - star spectral energy distributions in the rest - ultraviolet
. however , there are considerable portions of the arcs which appear redder with no ly-@xmath6 emission , consistent with being post - starburst regions . | although @xmath7 galaxies are being found in increasing numbers ( _ e.g. _ , c. steidel ; j. lowenthal , this volume ) , their study has been almost exclusively through their ultraviolet ( uv ) flux redshifted into the optical . as such , we merely know about the near - instantaneous star formation rate the uv continuum is dominated by massive short - lived ob stars , and hence is sensitive to star formation on the time - scale of only @xmath8 years . from studies of local galaxies , morphologies in the uv can be very different from the appearance in the optical ( _ e.g. _ , colley _
_ 1996 , apjlett 473 , 63 ) . to comprehensively study the underlying stellar populations
, one should also utilize longer rest wavelengths , where the light from older and less massive stars may dominate .
a useful spectral feature in the study of stellar populations is the 4000 break , which arises from metal - line blanketing in late - type stars .
even if the stellar population is only moderately evolved , there will still be the balmer break . at high-@xmath9
, these rest - frame optical breaks are redshifted into the near - ir ( figure 1 ) . here
we present preliminary results from an infrared study of stellar populations in a newly - discovered lensed galaxy at @xmath0 . at this redshift , in most cosmologies
the age of the universe is less than @xmath10gyr .
evidence for any semi - evolved stellar population would have significant implications for galaxy evolution in the early universe .
= 0.5 = 0.5 =
deep ground - based imaging and more recent hst studies of the cluster abell 2390 ( @xmath12 ) have revealed many giant arcs , arising from gravitational lensing of background galaxies . in particular
, a @xmath13 elliptical close to the critical curve of the cluster bisects an extended pair of thin , near - straight arcs ( figure 2 ) .
the brighter northern arc ( @xmath14 ) is @xmath15 long , with the southern component ( @xmath16 ) @xmath17 in length .
the similarity in colours ( @xmath18 , objects 4&5 in pell _
_ 1991 , apj 366 , 405 ) and their positions relative to the caustic suggest that these arcs are lensed images of the same source .
imaging with hst / wfpc2 reveals that the arcs are marginally resolved in the radial direction ( @xmath19 fwhm ) . taking a nave model of a tangentially - stretched spherical source implies a magnification @xmath20 , and more sophisticated lens geometries lead to a magnification of @xmath21 ( frye & broadhurst 1998 , apjlett _ submitted _ , astro - ph/9712111 ) .
the hst images also reveal the presence of two smaller counter - arcs . an arclet redshift survey by bzecourt & soucail ( 1997 , a&a 317 , 661 ) detected a single emission line at 6137 from the northern component ( their arclet#20 ) , and subsequent keck / lris spectroscopy ( frye & broadhurst 1998 ) confirmed this detection and identified the line as ly-@xmath6 at @xmath0 , on the basis of several rest - frame uv interstellar absorption features .
the southern arc and one of the counter - arcs were also confirmed to be at @xmath0 .
these arcs are amongst the highest - redshift galaxies known , and are not pre - selected for some agn characteristic or extreme luminosity ( they are magnified ) , nor are they preferentially colour - selected for a young stellar population .
thus , we may presuppose them to be lensed images of a ` normal ' galaxy , and this affords us the opportunity to study stellar populations in the early universe , uncontaminated by any contribution from a central engine .
at @xmath22 , the rest - frame optical is redshifted to the near - infrared , and the balmer+4000 break is placed between the @xmath3-band ( at @xmath23 m ) and the @xmath24-band ( at @xmath25 m ) . in figure 1 ( left panel ) we plot the evolution of the @xmath26 colour with age for an instantaneous starburst at @xmath0 .
for this system , the @xmath26 colour is an excellent discriminator of the stellar ages along the arcs .
we recently obtained deep @xmath3 & @xmath4 ( @xmath27 m ) imaging of the arcs in good seeing with the near infrared camera ( nirc ) on the w. m. keck - i telescope ( figure 2 ) .
the @xmath4-band approximates to the rest - frame @xmath28-band , and the integrated flux along the brighter northern arc ( @xmath29 ) suggests an intrinsic luminosity of @xmath30 for a @xmath31 cosmology , where @xmath32 is the magnification , and @xmath33 if @xmath34 .
comparison with the wfpc2 images reveals colour gradients along both arcs .
optical spectroscopy shows that only one of the four bright knots of the northern arc has prominent ly-@xmath6 emission ( labeled n4 in figure 2 ) .
the optical / near - ir colours of this are consistent with an ob star , implying a region of active star formation .
however , the broad - band colours integrated along the entire northern arc ( figure 1 , right panel ) show that the overall spectrum is best fit by a more evolved ( @xmath35myr ) population with extinction intrinsic to the source of @xmath36 .
this implies that there are older stars outside the actively star - forming h ii regions . in some areas , @xmath37 , indicating that @xmath38myr has elapsed since the major episode of star formation ( figure 1 , left ) .
our keck @xmath3- and @xmath4-data allow us to ` age - date ' the stellar populations in this spatially - resolved @xmath11 galaxy by the inferred amplitude of the balmer+4000 break along the transverse extent of the arcs . a more detailed treatment of the near - ir / optical colours will be given in bunker _
et al . _
( 1998 , _ in preparation _ ) .
we would like to thank the organizing committee .
we are grateful to daniel stern for many useful discussions .
this work is based on observations obtained at the w.m .
keck observatory , and with the nasa / esa hubble space telescope , obtained from the data archive at stsci which is operated by the association of universities for research in astronomy , inc .
, under the nasa contract nas 5 - 26555 . | @xmath7 galaxies found increasing study through ultraviolet uv flux redshifted into optical near - instantaneous star formation rate uv continuum dominated by massive short - lived stars sensitive to star formation time - scale @xmath8 years uv different from optical colley 1996 apjlett 473 63 study stellar populations utilize longer rest wavelengths light from older less massive stars spectral feature 4000 break from metal - line blanketing in late - type stars population moderately evolved balmer break high-@xmath9 rest - frame optical breaks redshifted into near - ir figure 1 preliminary results infrared study of stellar populations in newly - discovered lensed galaxy at @xmath0 redshift age universe less than @xmath10gyr semi - evolved stellar population implications for galaxy evolution early universe deep ground - imaging hst studies cluster abell 2390 @xmath12 ) revealed giant arcs from gravitational lensing of background galaxies @xmath13 elliptical curve bisects thin near - straight arcs figure 2brighter northern arc @xmath14 @xmath15 long southern @xmath16 @xmath17 length similarity in colours @xmath18 objects 4&5 1991 366 405 positions suggest arcs lensed images same source imaging hst / wfpc2 arcs marginally resolved radial direction @xmath19 nave model tangentially - stretched spherical source implies magnification @xmath20 sophisticated lens geometries magnification @xmath21 frye broadhurst 1998 astro - ph/9712111 hst images reveal two smaller counter - arcs arclet redshift survey bzecourt & soucail detected single emission line at 6137 northern component arclet#20 keck / lris spectroscopy confirmed identified line as ly-@xmath6 at @xmath0 interstellar features southern arc counter - arcs confirmed at @xmath0 arcs highest - redshift galaxies not pre - selected for agn characteristic extreme luminosity preferentially colour - selected for young stellar population presuppose lensed images of normal galaxy opportunity study stellar populations early universe@xmath22 optical redshifted to near - infrared balmer+4000 break between @xmath3-band @xmath24-band m figure 1 evolution @xmath26 colour with age for starburst @xmath0 @xmath26 colour discriminator stellar ages obtained deep @xmath3 & @xmath4 m ) imaging with near infrared camera w. keck - i telescope 2 @xmath4-band approximates @xmath28-band integrated flux along brighter northern arc @xmath29 ) suggests intrinsic luminosity of @xmath30 for @xmath31 cosmology @xmath32 magnification @xmath33 @xmath34 comparison wfpc2 images reveals colour gradients along arcs optical spectroscopy shows one four bright knots northern arc ly-@xmath6 emission n4 figure 2 optical colours consistent with ob star active star formation broad - band colours northern arc show spectrum fit by evolved ( @xmath35myr ) population extinction source @xmath36 implies older stars outside actively star - forming regions @xmath37 @xmath38myr elapsed since major episode star formationkeck @xmath3- age - date stellar populations spatially - resolved @xmath11 galaxy inferred amplitude balmer+4000 break transverse arcs detailed treatment near - ir optical colours bunker et al . 1998 preparation thank organizing committee grateful daniel stern discussions work based on observations w.m keck observatory nasa / esa hubble space telescope data archive stsci operated association universities research astronomy nasa contract nas 5 - 26555 | 0.26473 | 1,477 | 754 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,586 | we have used isajet and the jas lcd fast simulation to explore the precision of snowmass point sps1a selectron mass reconstruction for the silicon detector concept . simulating collisions at @xmath0 tev
, we have found that most of the information constraining the selectron mass is carried in the forward ( @xmath1 ) region .
we have also found that , for a beam energy spread of 1% ( conventional rf design ) , detector resolution limitations compromise the selectron mass reconstruction only in the forward region .
however , for a beam energy spread of less than 0.2% ( superconducting rf design ) , the detector resolution compromises the selectron mass reconstruction over the full angular region .
1.5 cm * selectron mass reconstruction and the resolution of the linear collider detector * + sharon gerbode , heath holguin , troy lau , paul mooser , adam pearlstein , joe rose , bruce schumm + santa cruz institute for particle physics + university of california , santa cruz we have used isajet and the jas lcd fast simulation to explore the precision of snowmass point sps1a selectron mass reconstruction for the silicon detector concept . simulating collisions at @xmath0 tev , we have found that most of the information constraining the selectron mass is carried in the forward ( @xmath1 ) region .
we have also found that , for a beam energy spread of 1% ( conventional rf design ) , detector resolution limitations compromise the selectron mass reconstruction only in the forward region .
however , for a beam energy spread of less than 0.2% ( superconducting rf design ) , the detector resolution compromises the selectron mass reconstruction over the full angular region .
talk presented at the 2005 international linear collider workshop , stanford university , stanford , california , march 18 - 22 , 2005 | for some time , the santa cruz linear collider r&d group has been interested in exploring the requirements that measuring forward selectron production places on the linear collider detector . with right - handed selectron and lightest neutralino masses of 143 and 95 gev , respectively , snowmass point sps1a produces a substantial forward ( @xmath2 ) population of electrons from selectron decay . over the past two years , the santa cruz group has developed techniques to isolate the forward selectron - decay signal from standard - model backgrounds , as well as techniques to extract the selectron mass from the observed selectron - decay electron spectrum .
this paper reports on the results of those studies .
backgrounds to the selectron - decay electron signal come from two primary sources : four - electron production for which two of the final - state fermions are close in angle to the beam trajectory , and thus escape detection , and the @xmath3-boson fusion process @xmath4 .
during the course of searches for supersymmetry at lep , several cuts were developed to isolate potential susy signals from standard model backgrounds .
* * fiducial region cut : * exactly one final - state positron and one final - state electron pair must be detected in the fiducial region . for this study ,
the fiducial region lies above 5 gev in momentum , and within @xmath5 for central - region studies , or within @xmath6 for studies including the forward region . *
* tagging cut : * no observable electron or positron in the low - angle ` tagging calorimetry ' ( with assumed coverage of 20mrad @xmath7 110mrad ) .
* * transverse momentum cut : * cuts events for which the vector sum of the observed @xmath8 pair transverse momenta is less than 500 gev @xmath9(20 mrad ) . for a signal region of @xmath5 ,
these cuts completely eliminate the four - electron background up to diagrams with additional radiation , and sufficiently select against the @xmath10 process . however , as one attempts to reconstruct the selectron decay signal beyond @xmath11 , both the radiative four - electron background and the @xmath10 backgrounds approach poles in their respective production cross sections , and begin to dominate the selectron signal . to suppress these backgrounds to a degree appropriate for use of the forward selectron decay signal , two additional cuts were applied .
* * photon cut : * remove event if there is an observed photon of 20 gev or greater in either the fiducial or tagging region . * * high - momentum cut : * remove even if the vector sum of the @xmath8 pair momenta has a magnitude of greater than 225 gev . with the application of these cuts to events produced at @xmath0 tev with 80% right - handed - polarized electron beam and unpolarized positrons , it was found that standard model processes provided a negligible background to the right - handed selectron signal .
in addition , the application of these selection criteria did not significantly alter the shape of the selectron - decay electron spectrum in either the central or forward region .
nevertheless , in the analysis that follows all of the selection cuts will be applied to the selectron signal ; however , standard model backgrounds will be ignored from this point on . finally , running with an 80% right - polarized electron beam ,
electrons from the decay of the more massive left - handed selectron provide a diffuse background to the right - handed selectron decay electron spectrum .
this contribution was also ignored in the right - handed selectron analysis .
the selectron signal was generated at @xmath0 tev using the snowmass point sps1a
@xcite parameters @xmath12 gev , @xmath13 gev , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , and sgn(@xmath16 ) = @xmath17 .
the sps1a specifications were implemented within the isajet @xcite package , and included the effects of initial state radiation , beamstrahlung ( @xmath18 ) , and three different values of the fractional beam energy spread ( assuming a gaussian distribution ) : 1.0% , 0.16% , and 0.0% .
for this point in susy parameter space , the endpoint of the selectron - decay electron energy distribution lies above 270 gev , making the precise measurement of the endpoint energy by the tracking system somewhat challenging . nonetheless , the projected @xmath19 resolution of the tracking system at this energy is somewhat better than that expected for the electromagnetic calorimetry .
the @xmath20 distribution of final - state electrons and positrons from the decay of right - handed selectrons is peaked towards @xmath21 , due to the sizeable t - channel contribution admitted by the relatively light selectron and neutralino .
approximately half of the signal lies in the forward region , beyond @xmath11 .
to focus on the accuracy of the selectron mass reconstruction , it was assumed for now that the lightest neutralino mass was known precisely from other measurements .
the santa cruz group plans to relax this assumption in further studies .
the selectron mass was determined by finding the best fit of the selectron energy spectrum to that of a series of ` template ' distributions generated with slightly varying right - handed selectron masses , but with all other aspects of the signal generation , including beam energy spread and detector smearing effects , the same as for the data simulation .
templates were produced for 15 right - handed selectron masses in a range of approximately @xmath22 gev about the nominal sps1a mass of 143.11 gev .
a total of 120 independent data sets , each corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 115 fb@xmath23 , were generated at the nominal sps1a mass .
for each of these data sets , a @xmath24 was formed against each of the templates points , according to @xmath25 where the sum is over energy bins in the selectron - decay electron spectrum , @xmath26 and @xmath27 are the data and template bin contents , respectively , and @xmath28 is the relative sample - size weighting factor . to minimize the statistical contributions of the template files ,
they were generated with an integrated luminosity of approximately 1000 fb@xmath23 each .
for each data set , the @xmath24 contour was fit with a quartic polynomial , which was then minimized to find the best - fit selectron mass .
this procedure was repeated for the 120 data sets , and the mean and root - mean - square deviation was calculated from the distribution of best - fit right - handed selectron masses . in forming the @xmath24 for each of the 120 independent data sets , it was found that the inclusion of energy - spectrum bins not sufficiently close to the upper and lower endpoints to provide useful information on the endpoint location introduced unacceptable scatter in the contour .
thus , for each scenario that was studied ( beam energy spread , detector model , polar angle reach ) , only bins near the upper and lower endpoint were used in forming the @xmath24 .
the exact energy ranges used in the @xmath24 calculation depended on the scenario under study , and was determined in a data - driven manner by examining the spectrum in the region of the endpoints in the generated data samples .
table i shows the regions used in the forming the @xmath24 for the different scenarios . to explore the effects of detector resolution ,
data sets and mass templates were generated assuming perfect detector resolution as well as that of the sdmar01 detector .
detector resolution effects were incorporated via gaussian smearing based on error matrices from billior - based tracking error calculations provided by the lcdtrk program @xcite .
two different ranges in @xmath29 were explored : between 0.0 and 0.8 and between 0.0 and 0.994 .
finally , three different values of the beam energy spread were explored : @xmath30 ( to allow benchmark comparisons to previous studies @xcite ) , @xmath31 ( approximately that expected for the superconducting rf design ) , and , for comparison , 0.0% .
.endpoint fit regions [ cols="<,^,^",options="header " , ] [ l2ea4-t1 ]
figure 1 shows the root - mean - square deviation observed for the 120 independent data sets for the different scenarios that were explored in the study ( in all cases , the mean value of the fit mass was reasonably consistent with the input vale of the right - handed selectron mass of 143.1 gev ) . for a perfect detector ( no measurement uncertainty ) ,
the inclusion of the forward region provides substantial improvement in the selectron mass measurement , independent of beam energy spread .
in fact , the improvement is better than one would expect from the factor - of - two increase in the number of signal electrons that is associated with the inclusion of the forward region .
a study of the two - dimensional frequency distribution of signal electrons as a function of energy and the cosine of the polar angle ( figure 2 ) reveals that the spectrum has a greater contribution at higher energy , where the sensitivity to the selectron mass is greatest , at high values of @xmath20 .
thus , in this case , most of the information on the selectron mass ( and on slepton masses in general ) is in the forward region . for large beam energy spread
, it is seen that the sensitivity to the selectron mass has little dependence on the detector resolution .
for this case , the sid design seems to be adequate to take advantage of the physics capabilities of the accelerator .
however , for smaller beam energy spread , this is not the case . for the energy
spread anticipated for the selected machine design , substantial improvement in the selectron mass determination can be achieved by improving the detector resolution , particularly in the forward region .
to examine the issue of measuring selectron masses in the forward region of the linear collider detector , we have simulated sps1a selectron production at @xmath0 tev . by developing two new selection criteria
, we have demonstrated that the selectron signal can be separated from standard model backgrounds through the entire forward tracking region @xmath32 .
due to the stiffening of the selectron - decay electron spectrum at higher values of @xmath29 , for a light selectron most of the information on selectron mass ( and slepton mass in general ) comes from the forward region . for large beam energy spread ( @xmath30 ) ,
we find that the sid detector design is adequate to exploit the potential of the linear collider ; however , for the expected beam energy spread of the chosen cold rf technology , gains in sensitivity to the selectron mass can be made by further improvements in momentum resolution , in both the central and forward regions .
although they appear as authors on this paper , one of us ( schumm ) would like to acknowledge the dedication and creativity of the other authors , who performed these studies as undergraduate physics majors at the university of california at santa cruz . | santa cruz linear collider r&d group requirements forward selectron production collider detector right - handed selectron lightest neutralino masses 143 95 gev snowmass point sps1a produces substantial forward population electrons from selectron decay developed techniques isolate forward selectron - decay signal from standard - model backgrounds extract selectron mass from decay electron spectrum paper reports results backgrounds selectron - decay electron signal from four - electron production @xmath3-boson fusion process @xmath4 cuts developed to isolate potential susy signals from standard model backgrounds fiducial region cut one final - state positron one electron pair detected in fiducial region above 5 gev momentum within @xmath5 for central @xmath6 forward region tagging cut no observable electron or positron in low - angle tagging calorimetry coverage 20mrad 110mrad transverse momentum cut cuts events vector sum observed @xmath8 pair transverse momenta less than 500 gev @xmath9(20 mrad ) @xmath5 cuts eliminate four - electron background diagrams additional radiation select against @xmath10 processselectron decay signal beyond @xmath11 radiative four - electron @xmath10 backgrounds approach poles dominate suppress backgrounds for forward selectron decay signal two cuts applied photon cut 20 gev or in region high - momentum cut @xmath8 pair momenta than 225 gev cuts to events at @xmath0 tev 80% right - handed - polarized electron beam unpolarized positrons standard model processes provided negligible background to right - handed selectron signal selection criteria alter shape selectron - decay electron spectrum central forward region selection cuts applied to selectron signal standard model backgrounds ignored 80% right - polarized electron beam electrons from decay left - handed selectron provide diffuse background to right - handed selectron decay electron spectrum ignored in right - handed selectron analysis selectron signal generated at @xmath0 tev using snowmass point sps1a @xcite parameters @xmath12 @xmath13 gev sgn(@xmath16 = @xmath17 sps1a specifications implemented isajet @xcite package included effects initial state radiation beamstrahlung @xmath18 three values fractional beam energy spread 1.0% 0.16% 0.0% endpoint selectron - decay electron energy distribution above 270 gev precise measurement challenging projected @xmath19 resolution better than electromagnetic calorimetry @xmath20 distribution of final - state electrons positrons from decay selectrons peaked towards @xmath21 due to t - channel contribution light selectron neutralino half signal in forward region beyond @xmath11 assumed lightest neutralino mass known from other measurements santa cruz group plans to relax assumption selectron mass determined by best fit selectron energy spectrum template distributions with varying selectron masses aspects signal generation beam energy spread detector smearing effects templates produced for 15 selectron masses range approximately @xmath22 gev nominal sps1a mass 143.11 gev 120 independent data sets integrated luminosity of 115 fb@xmath23 generated at nominal sps1a mass data sets @xmath24 formed against templates points @xmath25 sum over energy bins selectron - decay electron spectrum @xmath26 data template bin contents @xmath28 relative sample - size weighting factor minimize statistical contributions template files generated with integrated luminosity 1000 fb@xmath23 each @xmath24 contour fit with quartic polynomial minimized find best - fit selectron mass procedure repeated for 120 data sets mean root - mean - square deviation calculated from distribution best - fit selectron masses @xmath24 energy - spectrum bins not close to upper lower endpoints introduced unacceptable scatter in contour only bins near upper lower endpoint used @xmath24 exact energy ranges calculation depended on scenario determined examining spectrum region endpoints data samples table i shows regions used forming @xmath24 scenarios explore effects detector resolution data sets mass templates generated assuming perfect detector resolution sdmar01 detector detector resolution effects incorporated via gaussian smearing based on error matrices from billior - based tracking error calculations lcdtrk program @xciteranges in @xmath29 explored 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.994 three values beam energy spread explored : @xmath30 benchmark comparisons @xcite @xmath31 for superconducting rf design 0.0%.endpoint fit regions figure 1 shows root - mean - deviation for 120 independent data sets for different scenarios mean value fit mass consistent with input right - handed selectron mass 143.1 gev for perfect detector no inclusion of forward region provides improvement in selectron mass measurement independent of beam energy spread improvement better than from factor - of - two increase in number signal electrons with inclusion forward region study of two - dimensional frequency distribution of signal electrons function energy polar angle reveals spectrum greater contribution at higher energy sensitivity to selectron mass greatest at high values of @xmath20 most information on selectron mass in forward region large beam energy spread sensitivity to selectron mass little on detector resolution sid design adequate physics capabilities accelerator for smaller beam energy spread not case energy selected machine design improvement in selectron mass determination by improving detector resolution particularly in forward regionmeasuring selectron masses forward region linear collider detector simulated sps1a selectron production at @xmath0 tev developing two new selection criteria demonstrated selectron signal separated from standard model backgrounds forward tracking region @xmath32 stiffening selectron - decay electron spectrum at higher values @xmath29 light selectron information selectron mass from forward region large beam energy spread @xmath30 ) sid detector design adequate potential linear collider expected beam energy spread cold rf technology gains selectron mass improvements momentum resolution central forward regions acknowledge dedication creativity other authors performed studies undergraduate physics majors university california santa cruz | 0.356879 | 2,321 | 1,181 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,592 | we give a simple criterion when a gluck twisting an odd smooth @xmath0-manifold along a @xmath1-sphere @xmath2 does not change its diffeomorphism type .
we obtain this by handlebody techniques and plug twisting operation , getting a slightly stronger version of the known fact that gluck twisting of a @xmath1-sphere @xmath2 of a compact smooth @xmath0-manifold with an odd spherical class , in the complement of @xmath3 , does not change the diffeomorphism type of @xmath4 .
this is the best possible result on gluck twisting manifolds with odd homology classes . | an interesting problem of 4-dimensional topology is to determine whether @xmath5 has an exotic smooth structure .
the gluck twisting operation @xcite has been regarded as a potential method to produce an exotic @xmath5 ( cf .
this is the operation of removing an embedded @xmath6 from a 4-manifold and regluing it via the non - trivial diffeomorphism of @xmath7 . in @xcite by gluck twisting operation , an exotic pair of non - orientable 4-manifolds was constructed . on the other hand ,
many families of knotted @xmath1-spheres do not change @xmath5 by gluck twisting ( e.g. @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite ) .
indeed , no exotic pair of orientable 4-manifolds , which are related each other by gluck twist , known to exits .
it is thus interesting to see whether gluck twists can produce an exotic pair of orientable 4-manifolds . for a smooth @xmath0-manifold @xmath4 and a
smoothly imbedded @xmath1-sphere with trivial normal bundle @xmath2 , let @xmath8 denote the tubular neighborhood of @xmath3 .
let @xmath9 be the manifold obtained by surgering @xmath4 along @xmath3 , that is @xmath10 we call a second homology class @xmath11 of @xmath4 is sherical , if @xmath11 is representd by a continuous map of the 2-sphere . in this paper ,
by using handlebody techniques and plug twisting operation , we give an alternative proof of the known result ( corollary [ intro : cor ] ) .
in fact , this approach gives the slightly stronger result below .
[ intro : thm ] let @xmath4 be any compact connected smooth @xmath0-manifold , and @xmath2 be a smoothly embedded @xmath1-sphere with trivial normal bundle .
then , gluck twisting @xmath4 along @xmath3 does not change the diffeomorphism type of @xmath4 , provided there is a @xmath1-dimensional spherical homology class in @xmath12 with odd self intersection .
note that this theorem is the best possible result about gluck twisting odd manifolds .
this is because @xcite implies that one can get an example of a @xmath1-sphere in an odd manifold @xmath2 , where gluck twisting @xmath4 along @xmath3 can change its diffeomorphism type ( consequently @xmath13 does not have any odd spherical class ) .
note that the orientibility is not part of the hypothesis of our theorem .
also note that the condition of having a spherical class in @xmath14 with odd self intersection is equivalent to having a class of odd self intersection in the cohomology group @xmath15 with coefficients , where @xmath16 is the group ring @xmath17 $ ] , since @xmath18 where @xmath19 denotes the universal cover , and @xmath20 cohomology with compact support .
[ intro : cor ] let @xmath4 and @xmath3 be as in theorem [ intro : thm ] .
if @xmath21 has a simply connected codimension 0 submanifold with odd intersection form , then gluck twisting @xmath4 along @xmath3 does not change the diffeomorphism type of @xmath4 .
* acknowledgements .
* this work was done during the second author s stay at michigan state university in march 2012 and march 2013 .
he would like to thank their hospitality .
the authors would like to thank robert gompf for pointing out an error in an earlier draft of this paper .
in this paper we will use the dotted circle notation of 1-handles . now let us recall the definition of the gluck twisting operation :
let @xmath22 be the self - diffeomorphism difined by @xmath23 , where @xmath24 denotes the @xmath25 rotation of the unit 2-sphere about the axis through its poles .
[ def : gluck ] let @xmath4 be a smooth @xmath0-manifold , and let @xmath3 be a 2-sphere in @xmath4 such that its self - intersecion number is zero .
let @xmath26 be the smooth @xmath0-manifold obtained from @xmath4 by removing the regular neighborhood @xmath8 of @xmath3 , and then regluing it via @xmath27 .
this construction @xmath28 is called the gluck twisting of @xmath4 along @xmath3 .
there are several ways to draw a handle diagram of gluck twists , here we recall the simple method pointed out in @xcite
. the usefulness of this new method will be evident in the proof of theorem [ intro : thm ] let @xmath4 and @xmath3 be as in definition [ def : gluck ] .
consider a handle decomposition @xmath29 where we represent @xmath8 by a @xmath30-framed unknot in the handle diagram .
introduce a canceling 1- and 2-handle pair locally as in the right picture of figure [ fig1 ] .
surger the introduced @xmath31 to @xmath6 , and surger @xmath32 to @xmath31 ( i.e. exchange the dot and the @xmath30 as in the bottom picture ) .
note that this is a plug twist along @xmath33 ( see @xcite ) .
this operation in fact describes the gluck twist : along @xmath3,width=336 ] [ gluck_diagram ] the resulting @xmath0-manifold is diffeomorphic to the gluck twist @xmath26 .
if @xmath4 has boundary , then we may assume that the diffeomorphism is the identity on the boundary .
one can easily see that the above operation is removing @xmath8 and regluing it via a self - diffeomorphism ( say @xmath34 ) of @xmath7 . a theorem of gluck @xcite ( cf .
@xcite ) on the diffeotopy group of @xmath7 implies that , we only need to check @xmath34 does not extend to a self - homeomorphism of @xmath6 .
this can be seen by applying the above procedure to the standard handle decomposition of @xmath35 and @xmath36 : the resulting manifold @xmath37 is not homeomorphic to @xmath35 .
we can similarly prove that the gluck twist is obtained by the plug twist along @xmath38 for any integer @xmath39 .
for a 4-dimentional handlebody @xmath40 , we denote by @xmath41 the subhandlebody of @xmath40 consisting of its handles with their indices @xmath42 .
we first prepare the lemma below .
let @xmath40 be a smooth compact connected 4-dimentional handlebody , and let @xmath43 be a continuous map .
we denote by @xmath44 $ ] the second homology class of @xmath40 given by @xmath45 .
suppose @xmath44\neq 0 $ ] .
then , if necessary after introducing canceling 2- and 3-handle pairs and sliding 2-handles , @xmath44 $ ] is represented by a 2-handle of @xmath40 whose attaching circle is null - homotoic in @xmath46 .
we may assume that @xmath45 is an immersion by homotopy .
furthermore , we may assume that the image of @xmath45 is contained in @xmath47 , since the cocore of a 3-handle is codimention 3 .
let @xmath48 be the transverse intersection points of @xmath49 and the cocores of 2-handles of @xmath40 .
let @xmath50 @xmath51 be a small 2-disk neighborhoods of @xmath52 in @xmath53 .
we may assume that each @xmath54 is a core of a 2-handle of @xmath40 and that @xmath55 is contained in @xmath46 . for each @xmath56
, take an arc @xmath57 connecting @xmath50 and @xmath58 , with @xmath59 its tubular neighborhood , so that @xmath60 is a 2-disk in @xmath53 and that each @xmath61 is an embedding .
we can isotope @xmath45 so that each @xmath62 is contained in @xmath63 .
now we obtain a 2-handle of @xmath40 whose attaching circle is @xmath64 , by introducing canceling 2- and 3-handle pairs and sliding 2-handles along the band @xmath65 s .
this 2-handle represents the class @xmath44 $ ] . since @xmath66 is a 2-disk , the attaching circle @xmath67 bounds an immersed disk in @xmath46 .
hence this attaching circle is null - homotopic in @xmath46 .
we next prove the main theorem .
let @xmath68 be the attaching circle of the handle representing the spherical homology class of @xmath12 with odd self intersection . according to the above lemma , we can assume @xmath68 is a null homotopic loop in the codimension zero submanifold @xmath69 of @xmath12 consisting of its @xmath30- and @xmath70-handles .
hence after ( self crossing ) clasp moves @xmath68 can be made to be an unknot . in paricular ,
if there is another handle represented by a small circle @xmath71 linking @xmath68 with zero framing , then by sliding @xmath68 over @xmath71 we can make @xmath68 an unknotted circle as shown in figure [ figa1 ] . having this observation in mind , let us perform the gluck twisting operation to @xmath4 along @xmath3 as shown in figure [ figa2 ] .
now by sliding the middle @xmath70-framed handle over @xmath68 , we get a 2-handle @xmath72 with even framing . by using the above observation
, we can isotope @xmath72 to the standard middle @xmath30-framed circle of the last picture of figure [ figa2 ] . here
consider the subhandlebody of @xmath26 described in the upper left diagram of figure [ fig4 ] .
we reverse the gluck twisting operation applied to @xmath26 .
lemma [ gluck_diagram ] shows that this reversing operation is equivalent to exchanging @xmath30 and the dot as shown in the left procedure of figure [ fig4 ] .
the right procedure of figure [ fig4 ] shows that this is a composition of undone operations ( recall that every self - diffeomorphism of @xmath73 extends to a self - diffeomorphism of @xmath74 . ) . hence @xmath26 is diffeomorphic to @xmath4 .
s. akbulut and k. yasui , _ corks , plugs and exotic structures _ , journal of gkova geometry topology , volume * 2 * ( 2008 ) , 4082 .
f. ding and h. geiges , _ the diffeotopy group of @xmath75 via contact topology _ , compos .
* 146 * ( 2010 ) , no . 4 , 10961112 . h. gluck , _ the embedding of two - spheres in the four - sphere _ ,
soc . * 104 * ( 1962 ) , 308333 .
r. gompf , _ more cappell - shaneson spheres are standard _ , algebr . geom . topol . *
10 * ( 2010 ) , no . 3 , 16651681 .
gompf and a.i .
stipsicz , _ @xmath0-manifolds and kirby calculus _ , graduate studies in mathematics , * 20*. american mathematical society , 1999 .
c. mca .
gordon , _ knots in the 4 -sphere _ , comment . math . helv .
* 51 * ( 1976 ) , no . 4 , 585596 . d. nash and a.i .
stipsicz , _ gluck twist on a certain family of 2-knots _ , arxiv:1103.5571 . | problem 4-dimensional topology determine @xmath5 exotic smooth structure gluck twisting operation potential exotic @xmath5 removing @xmath6 from 4-manifold regluing via non - trivial diffeomorphism @xmath7 exotic pair non - orientable 4-manifolds constructed many families knotted @xmath1-spheres change @xmath5 by gluck twisting no exotic pair orientable 4-manifolds twist exits interesting see gluck twists produce exotic pair orientable 4-manifolds smooth @xmath0-manifold @xmath4 smoothly imbedded @xmath1-sphere with trivial normal bundle @xmath2 @xmath8 denote tubular neighborhood @xmath3 @xmath9 manifold surgering @xmath4 along @xmath3 @xmath10 second homology class @xmath11 of @xmath4 sherical @xmath11 representd continuous map 2-sphere handlebody techniques plug twisting operation alternative proof known result approach gives stronger result @xmath4 compact connected smooth @xmath0-manifold @xmath2 smoothly embedded @xmath1-sphere with trivial normal bundlegluck twisting @xmath4 @xmath3 change diffeomorphism @xmath1-dimensional spherical homology class in @xmath12 with odd self intersection theorem best result about gluck twisting odd manifolds implies @xmath1-sphere in odd manifold @xmath2 gluck twisting @xmath4 diffeomorphism @xmath13 odd spherical class orientibility not part of hypothesis spherical class in @xmath14 with odd self intersection equivalent to odd in cohomology group @xmath15 @xmath16 group ring @xmath17 @xmath19 universal cover @xmath20 cohomology with compact support @xmath4 @xmath3 in theorem if @xmath21 connected codimension 0 submanifold with odd intersection form gluck twisting @xmath4 @xmath3 change diffeomorphism @xmath4 work second author s stay at michigan state university march 2012 2013 robert gompf error earlier draft use dotted circle notation of 1-handles recall definition gluck twisting operation @xmath22 be self - diffeomorphism difined by @xmath23 @xmath24 denotes @xmath25 rotation of unit 2-sphere about axisdef : gluck @xmath4 smooth @xmath0-manifold @xmath3 2-sphere self - intersecion zero @xmath26 smooth @xmath0-manifold from @xmath4 removing regular neighborhood @xmath8 regluing via @xmath27 construction @xmath28 gluck twisting @xmath4 along @xmath3 several ways draw handle diagram gluck twists simple method @xcite usefulness method proof of theorem @xmath4 @xmath3 definition def gluck handle decomposition @xmath29 represent @xmath8 by @xmath30-framed unknot handle diagram introduce canceling 1- 2-handle pair right picture figure surger @xmath31 to @xmath6 @xmath32 to @xmath31 exchange dot @xmath30 bottom picture plug twist along @xmath33 operation describes gluck twist @xmath3 resulting @xmath0-manifold diffeomorphic to gluck twist @xmath26 @xmath4 boundary diffeomorphism identity boundary operation removing @xmath8 regluing via self - diffeomorphism @xmath34 of @xmath7 theorem of gluck @xcite@xcite diffeotopy group @xmath7 implies check @xmath34 self - homeomorphism @xmath6 applying procedure handle decomposition @xmath35 @xmath36 manifold @xmath37 not homeomorphic @xmath35 prove gluck twist obtained plug twist @xmath38 integer @xmath39 4-dimentional handlebody @xmath40 denote @xmath41 subhandlebody @xmath40 handles indices @xmath42 prepare lemma @xmath40 smooth compact 4-dimentional handlebody @xmath43 continuous map denote @xmath44 second homology class @xmath40 @xmath45 @xmath44\neq 0 $ 2- 3-handle pairs @xmath44 represented 2-handle @xmath40 attaching circle null - homotoic @xmath46 assume @xmath45 immersion homotopy image @xmath45 @xmath47 cocore 3-handle codimention 3 @xmath48 transverse intersection points @xmath49 cocores 2-handles @xmath40 @xmath50 @xmath51 small 2-disk neighborhoods @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 core 2-handle @xmath40 @xmath55 @xmath46@xmath56 arc @xmath57 connecting @xmath50 @xmath59 tubular neighborhood @xmath60 2-disk @xmath53 @xmath61 embedding isotope @xmath45 @xmath62 @xmath63 obtain 2-handle @xmath40 attaching circle @xmath64 introducing canceling 2- 3-handle pairs sliding 2-handles band @xmath65 2-handle represents class @xmath44 @xmath66 2-disk attaching circle @xmath67 bounds immersed disk @xmath46 null - homotopic @xmath46 prove theorem @xmath68 attaching circle handle spherical homology class @xmath12 odd self intersection @xmath68 null homotopic loop codimension zero submanifold @xmath69 @xmath12 @xmath30- @xmath70-handles @xmath68 unknot another handle @xmath71 linking @xmath68 zero framing sliding @xmath68 over @xmath71 @xmath68 unknotted circle figure figa1 gluck twisting operation @xmath4 along @xmath3 figure figa2 sliding middle @xmath70-framed handle over @xmath68 2-handle @xmath72 even framingusing observation isotope @xmath72 middle @xmath30-framed circle last picture figure consider subhandlebody @xmath26 upper left diagram figure fig4 reverse gluck twisting operation @xmath26 reversing operation equivalent exchanging @xmath30 dot left procedure figure fig4 right procedure composition undone operations self - diffeomorphism @xmath73 extends self - diffeomorphism @xmath74 @xmath26 diffeomorphic @xmath4 s. akbulut k yasui corks plugs exotic structures journal gkova geometry topology volume 2 2008 ) 4082 f. ding geiges diffeotopy group @xmath75 contact topology 146 2010 ) no 4 10961112 gluck embedding two - spheres four - sphere 104 1962 ) 308333 gompf cappell - shaneson spheres standard algebr geom topol 10 2010 ) no 3 16651681 gompf stipsicz @xmath0-manifolds kirby calculus graduate studies mathematics american mathematical society 1999 gordon knots 4 -sphere comment math 51 1976 ) no 4 585596nash stipsicz gluck twist family 2-knots arxiv:1103.5571 | 0.42907 | 2,759 | 1,541 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,593 | in 2009 , the discovery of two planets orbiting the evolved binary star system hw virginis was announced , based on systematic variations in the timing of eclipses between the two stars .
the planets invoked in that work were significantly more massive than jupiter , and moved on orbits that were mutually crossing - an architecture which suggests that mutual encounters and strong gravitational interactions are almost guaranteed . in this work ,
we perform a highly detailed analysis of the proposed hw vir planetary system .
first , we consider the dynamical stability of the system as proposed in the discovery work . through a mapping process involving 91,125 individual simulations , we find that the system is so unstable that the planets proposed simply can not exist , due to mean lifetimes of less than a thousand years across the whole parameter space .
we then present a detailed re - analysis of the observational data on hw vir , deriving a new orbital solution that provides a very good fit to the observational data .
our new analysis yields a system with planets more widely spaced , and of lower mass , than that proposed in the discovery work , and yields a significantly greater ( and more realistic ) estimate of the uncertainty in the orbit of the outermost body . despite this
, a detailed dynamical analysis of this new solution similarly reveals that it also requires the planets to move on orbits that are simply not dynamically feasible .
our results imply that some mechanism other than the influence of planetary companions must be the principal cause of the observed eclipse timing variations for hw vir .
if the system does host exoplanets , they must move on orbits differing greatly from those previously proposed .
our results illustrate the critical importance of performing dynamical analyses as a part of the discovery process for multiple - planet exoplanetary systems .
binaries : close , binaries : eclipsing , stars : individual : hw vir , planetary systems , methods : n - body simulations | since the discovery of the first planets around other stars @xcite , the search for exoplanets has blossomed to become one of the most exciting fields of modern astronomical research . the great majority of the hundreds of exoplanets that have been discovered over the past two decades have been found orbiting sun - like stars by dedicated international radial velocity programs . among these programmes
are harps ( the high accuracy radial velocity planetary search project , e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , aaps ( the anglo - australian planet search , e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , california ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , lick - carnegie ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , and texas ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
the other main method for exoplanet detection is the transit technique , which searches for the small dips in the brightness of stars that result from the transit of planets across them .
ground - based surveys such as wasp @xcite and hat @xcite have pioneered such observations , and resulted in the discovery of a number of interesting planetary systems . in the coming years , such surveys using space - based observatories will revolutionise the search for exoplanets .
indeed , a rapidly growing contribution to the catalogue of known exoplanets comes from the _ kepler _ spacecraft ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , which will likely result in the number of known exoplanets growing by an order of magnitude in the coming years . in recent years , a number of new exoplanet discoveries have been announced featuring host stars that differ greatly from the sun - like archetype that make up the bulk of detections .
the most striking of these are the circumbinary planets , detected around eclipsing binary stars via the periodic variations in the timing of observed stellar eclipses .
a number of these unusual systems feature cataclysmic variable stars , interacting binary stars composed of a white dwarf primary and a roche lobe filling m star secondary .
sharply - defined eclipses of the bright accretion spot , with periods of hours , can be timed with a precision of a few seconds . in these systems , the eclipse timings are fitted with a linear ephemeris , and the residuals ( @xmath0 ) are found to display further , higher - order variations .
these variations can be attributed to the gravitational effects of distant orbiting bodies which tug on the eclipsing binary stars , causing the eclipses to appear slightly early or late . this light - travel time
( ltt ) effect can then be measured and used to infer the presence of planetary - mass companions around these highly unusual stars .
some examples of circumbinary companions discovered in this manner include uz for @xcite , nn ser @xcite , dp leo @xcite , hu aqr @xcite and sz her @xcite the first circumbinary planets to be detected around hosts other than pulsars were those in the hw vir system @xcite , which features a subdwarf primary , of spectral class b , and a red dwarf companion which display mutual eclipses with a period of around 2.8 hours @xcite .
the detection of planets in this system was based on the timing of mutual eclipses between the central stars varying in a fashion that was best fit by including two sinusoidal timing variations .
the first , attributed to a companion of mass @xmath1 , had a period of 15.8 years , and a semi - amplitude of 77 s , while the second , attributed to a companion of mass @xmath2 , had a period of 9.1 years and semi - amplitude of 23 s. whilst these semi - amplitudes might appear relatively small , the precision with which the timing of mutual eclipses between the components of the hw vir binary can be measured means that such variations are relatively easy to detect . over the last decade ,
a number of studies have shown that , for systems that are found to contain more than one planetary body , a detailed dynamical study is an important component of the planet discovery process that should not be overlooked ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
however , despite these pioneering works , the great majority of exoplanet discovery papers still fail to take account of the dynamical behaviour of the proposed systems .
fortunately , this situation is slowly changing , and recent discovery papers such as @xcite , @xcite and @xcite have shown how studying the dynamical interaction between the proposed planets can provide significant additional constraints on the plausible orbits allowed for those planets .
such studies can even reveal systems in which the observed signal can not be explained by the presence of planetary companions .
the planets proposed to orbit hu aqr are one such case , with a number of studies ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) showing that the orbital architectures allowed by the observations are dynamically unstable on astronomically short timescales .
in other words , whilst it is clear that the observed signal is truly there , it seems highly unlikely that it is solely the result of orbiting planets .
given these recent studies , it is clearly important to consider whether known multiple - planet exoplanetary systems are truly what they seem to be . in this work ,
we present a re - analysis of the 2-planet system proposed around the eclipsing binary hw vir . in section 2 ,
we briefly review the hw vir planetary system as proposed by @xcite . in section 3 , a detailed dynamical analysis of the planets proposed in that work is performed . in section 4
, we present a re - analysis of the observations of hw vir that led to the announcements of the exoplanets , obtaining a new orbital solution for those planets which is dynamically tested in section 5 .
finally , in section 6 , we present a discussion of our work , and draw conclusions based on the results herein .
the hw vir system consists of a subdwarf b primary and an m6 - 7 main sequence secondary .
the system eclipses with a period of 2.8 hours @xcite , and the stars have masses of @xmath3 and @xmath4 @xcite .
changes in the orbital period of the eclipsing binary were first noted by @xcite ; further observations led other authors to suggest that the period changes were due to ltt effects arising from an orbiting substellar companion @xcite . @xcite obtained a further 8 years of photometric observations of hw vir . those data , in combination with the previously published eclipse timings spanning 24 years , indicated that the period changes consisted of a quadratic trend plus two sinusoidal variations with periods of 15.8 and 9.1 years .
@xcite examined alternative explanations for the cyclical changes , ruling out apsidal motion and magnetic period modulation via the applegate mechanism @xcite .
they concluded that the most plausible cause of the observed cyclic period changes is the light - travel time effect induced by two companions with masses 19.2 and 8.5 .
the parameters of their fit can be found in table [ lee09_params ] .
formally , the planets are referred to as hw vir ( ab)b and hw vir ( ab)c , but for clarity , we refer to the planets as hw vir b and hw vir c. | discovery first planets around stars @xcite search for exoplanets blossomed exciting modern astronomical research majority hundreds of exoplanets discovered past two decades found orbiting sun - like stars by international radial velocity programs programmes are harps ( high radial velocity search project * ? ? ? aaps anglo - australian planet search ? ? california lick - carnegie texas ? ? other main method for exoplanet detection is transit technique searches for small dips in brightness stars from transit planets ground - based surveys as wasp @xcite and hat @xcite pioneered such observations resulted in interesting planetary systems surveys using space - based observatories will revolutionise search for exoplanets rapidly growing contribution to catalogue known exoplanets from _ kepler _ spacecraft * ? ? ? * * ? ? ? * * ? ? * likely result in number of known exoplanets growing coming years new exoplanet discoveries announced featuring host stars differ from sun - like archetype detectionsstriking are circumbinary planets detected around eclipsing stars via variations timing eclipses systems feature cataclysmic variable stars interacting binary stars white dwarf primary roche lobe filling m star secondary eclipses of spot periods hours timed few seconds eclipse timings fitted with linear ephemeris residuals @xmath0 display higher variations variations attributed to gravitational effects of distant orbiting bodies eclipsing stars eclipses early or late light - travel time ltt ) effect measured infer presence planetary - mass companions around stars examples circumbinary companions include uz for @xcite nn ser @xcite dp leo @xcite hu aqr @xcite sz her @xcite first circumbinary planets detected around hosts pulsars in hw vir system @xcite subdwarf primary spectral class b red dwarf companion mutual eclipses period 2.8 hours detection based on timing mutual eclipses central stars two sinusoidal timing variations first period 15.8 years semi - amplitude 77 s second 9.1 years semi - amplitude 23 ssemi - amplitudes appear small precision timing of mutual eclipses between hw vir binary measured variations easy to detect last decade studies shown for systems more than one planetary body detailed dynamical study important planet discovery process not overlooked despite pioneering works majority of exoplanet discovery papers fail to take account dynamical behaviour of proposed systems situation slowly changing recent discovery papers @xcite , @xcite @xcite shown studying dynamical interaction between proposed planets provide constraints on plausible orbits for studies can reveal systems observed signal not be explained by presence of planetary companions planets proposed to orbit hu aqr are one such case studies showing orbital architectures dynamically unstable on short timescales observed signal there unlikely solely result of orbiting planets recent studies important to consider known multiple - planet exoplanetary systems what they seem to be in work present re - analysis of 2-planet system proposed around eclipsing binary hw vir in section 2 review hw vir planetary system as proposed by @xcite in section 3 detailed dynamical analysis of planets proposed performedsection 4 re - analysis observations hw vir announcements exoplanets new orbital solution tested section 5 section 6 discussion work conclusions results hw vir system subdwarf b primary m6 - 7 main sequence secondary system eclipses 2.8 hours stars masses @xmath3 @xmath4 changes orbital period eclipsing binary noted by @xcite observations period changes due to ltt effects orbiting substellar companion @xcite 8 years photometric observations hw vir data eclipse timings 24 years period changes quadratic trend two sinusoidal variations periods 15.8 9.1 years @xcite examined alternative explanations cyclical changes ruling out apsidal motion magnetic period modulation concluded plausible cause period changes light - travel time effect by two companions masses 19.2 and 8.5 parameters in table [ lee09_params ] planets referred hw vir ( ab)b hw vir ( ab)c clarity hw vir b and hw vir c | 0.269258 | 1,658 | 799 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,603 | we present ultrahigh - resolution measurements of state - to - state inelastic differential cross sections for no - ne and no - ar collisions , obtained by combining the stark deceleration and velocity map imaging techniques .
we show that for counterpropagating crossed beam geometries , the effect of the velocity spreads of the reagent beams on the angular resolution of the images is minimized .
futhermore , the counterpropagating geometry results in images that are symmetric with respect to the relative velocity vector .
this allows for the use of inverse abel transformation methods that enhance the resolution further .
state - resolved diffraction oscillations in the differential cross sections are measured with an angular resolution approaching 0.3@xmath0 .
distinct structures observed in the cross sections gauge the quality of recent _ ab initio _ potential energy surfaces for no - rare gas atom collisions with unprecedented precision .
the development of experimental methods to study molecular collisions with the highest possible detail has been a quest in molecular collision research since it was established in the 1950s . in recent years , velocity map imaging ( vmi ) has revolutionized our ability to study molecular collision processes in crossed beam experiments @xcite .
the power of the technique derives from the ability to record a two - dimensional image of scattered molecules that directly reflects their recoil velocities and thus the differential cross section ( dcs ) of the scattering process . in the last decade
, vmi has been implemented in many scattering experiments and has made experiments possible that would have been inconceivable only a few years ago @xcite .
precise measurements of dcss provide unique and sensitive tests for the underlying potential energy surfaces ( pess ) that govern the dynamics of interacting molecules . to validate the ever more sophisticated and accurate theoretical descriptions of scattering processes , it is essential to obtain ever higher resolutions in the experimental scattering images .
the inherent resolution of vmi in principle allows for dcs measurements that probe pess with spectroscopic resolution .
the image resolution that is typically obtained in crossed beam experiments , however , is limited by the velocity spreads of both beams involved .
the overlap between the signals from collision partners with different velocities can significantly blur the images , thereby obscuring detailed structures that may be present in the dcs . in the last decade
, several techniques have been developed to obtain complete control over molecules in beams .
in particular , methods such as stark and zeeman deceleration allow for the production of packets of molecules with high density , tunable velocity , near - zero velocity spread and almost perfect quantum state purity @xcite .
clearly , these tamed molecular beams are ideally suited for precise molecular scattering experiments , in particular when combined with state - of - the art detection techniques such as vmi .
recently , we have reported the first crossed beam experiment in which a stark decelerator was combined with vmi , indeed resulting in scattering images with much higher resolution @xcite . yet ,
thus far only one of the reagent beams has been velocity - controlled using a stark decelerator .
the image resolution is then limited by the relatively large velocity spread of the collision partner which is produced via conventional beam methods .
although reduction of this spread using mechanical velocity filters appears feasible , it will be difficult to reach the narrow distribution that is readily achieved for the stark - decelerated reagent beam . here
, we present a method to minimize the contribution of the collision partner s velocity spread to the angular resolution of the scattering images . exploiting the favorable kinematics present
when counterpropagating beams are used , we obtain record - high angular resolutions and thereby probe dcss with unprecedented accuracy .
this is illustrated by fully resolving diffraction oscillations in state - to - state dcss for no - ne and no - ar collisions .
for no - ar , we observe distinct features in the diffraction pattern that appear extremely sensitive to the details of the pess .
these features are used to gauge the quality of two recent pess for this benchmark system .
the influence of the crossed beam geometry on the kinematics and resolution of the experiment is illustrated in figure [ fig : kinematics ] .
for the sake of the argument , newton diagrams are shown for the scattering of two beams containing particles of equal mass and equal pre - collision mean velocity .
beam crossing angles of 90@xmath0 and 180@xmath1 are assumed in panels _ a _ and _ b _ , respectively .
we approximate the kinematics present in our crossed beam experiments ( a stark - decelerated beam with mean velocity @xmath2 crosses with a conventional beam with mean velocity @xmath3 ) by assuming that only the conventional beam has a non - zero velocity spread . to model a structured dcs
, we consider a hypothetical dcs that exhibits a series of block functions , indicated by colored stripes , that are spaced with an angular interval of 12.5@xmath1 .
newton diagrams are shown for scattering with the mean velocity ( blue ) , and the two outermost values from the beam distribution ( red and green ) .
it is seen that for scattering angles around forward scattering ( @xmath4 ) where the most detailed structures in dcss are typically found the _ velocity _ spread of the collision partner does not contribute to the image blurring when a counterpropagating beam geometry is used .
the angular image resolution is then exclusively determined by the _
angular _ spread of the beam , and high angular image resolutions can be achieved by simply collimating the beam .
this sharply contrasts the situation for a 90@xmath1 crossing angle . here , the velocity spread of the collision partner results in both radial _ and _ angular blurring of the image ; angular image resolutions can only be significantly improved by reducing the velocity spread of the collision partner .
the counterpropagating geometry has the additional advantage that scattering images are inherently cylindrically symmetric with respect to the mean relative velocity vector of the colliding beams ( see figure [ fig : kinematics ] ) .
this allows for the use of inverse abel transformation methods to retrieve the angular scattering distributions that underly the three - dimensional newton spheres .
this transformation effectively cancels the additional blurring of images that occurs when these newton spheres are projected onto the detector plane @xcite .
again , this sharply contrasts the situation for a 90@xmath1 crossing angle . here , the inherent angular and radial resolution is different in every part of the image , and symmetry with respect to the mean relative velocity is broken .
further asymmetry in image intensity arises that is related to a detection bias for low laboratory recoil velocities which are preferentially found on one side of the image @xcite .
together , these asymmetries have thus far prevented the use of abel inversion methods in crossed beam scattering experiments .
methods to improve image resolutions by recording only a central slice of the newton sphere have been developed @xcite , but in crossed beam experiments one can not always afford the inherent reduction in signal intensity .
either way , complex forward iterative methods are required to disentangle instrument dependent detection probabilities from the desired scattering intensity distribution .
the use of counterpropagating beam geometries in crossed beam experiments is rather unconventional .
henning meyer successfully used counterpropagating pulsed beam scattering techniques in the early 90 s to facilitate measurements of angular resolved state specific product distributions using time - of - flight detection of the scattered molecules @xcite , but the technique has hardly been used ever since .
we use a crossed beam scattering apparatus in which a packet of no ( @xmath5 ) radicals with a mean velocity of 350 m / s , a velocity spread of 1.2 m / s ( 1@xmath6 ) , and an angular spread of 0.04@xmath1 ( 1@xmath6 ) is produced by passing a beam of no through a 2.6 m long stark decelerator @xcite .
the packet of no collides with a beam of ne or ar atoms at a beam intersection angle of 180@xmath1 , resulting in a relatively high collision energy of 720 @xmath7 and 725 @xmath7 for no - ne and no - ar , respectively .
the rare gas atom beam is well collimated by placing a 1 mm wide slit between the 2 mm diameter skimmer and the interaction region .
scattered molecules are detected state - selectively using a two - color laser ionization scheme and a standard vmi geometry @xcite .
the two laser beams are directed parallel to the detector plane , and cross each other at right angles .
the implementation of a counterpropagating beam geometry in our experiment is aided by the use of reagent beam pulses with a narrow temporal distribution , such that the pulses only spatially overlap within a well defined volume . in the interaction region ,
the packet of no radicals and the rare gas atom beam has a temporal width of 25 @xmath8s and 15 @xmath8s , respectively .
the experiment is synchronized such that the leading edges of both beams overlap for only about 5 @xmath8s before both detection lasers are fired .
figure [ fig : raw - data](_a _ ) and ( _ b _ ) depict the experimental scattering images for inelastic collisions of no ( @xmath9 ) with ne and ar that excite the no radicals to the @xmath10 and the @xmath11 state , respectively . a clear oscillatory structure
originating from the quantum mechanical nature of molecules that leads to diffraction of matter waves during molecular collisions is observed for both scattering systems .
the @xmath12 channel for no - ne has a relatively large integral cross section of 2.7 @xmath13 , and the well - separated diffraction oscillations in this system could be observed in our previous experiments using a @xmath14 beam crossing angle @xcite .
comparison with the present results shows that when a counterpropagating geometry is used , a superior angular resolution is obtained , even though the collision energy is higher resulting in a smaller peak - to - peak separation of the diffraction peaks .
the @xmath15 channel for no - ar has an integral cross section of only 0.77 @xmath13 , and despite various efforts we have been unable to resolve oscillations in the dcs for this system in previous experiments .
the channel displays one of the richest diffraction structures that we have identified thus far , with a peak - to - peak separation between individual diffraction peaks of 1.6@xmath1 ( _ vide infra _ ) .
the clearly resolved oscillations observed here for this system are a testimony of the unprecedented angular resolution afforded by the counterpropagating geometry .
as expected , the images are ( almost ) symmetric with respect to the relative velocity vector . within our experimental geometry ,
doppler and collision induced alignment effects cause a small dependence of the detection probability on the angle between the recoiling molecule and the propagation direction of the excitation laser . however
, this asymmetry in intensity does not affect the inherent radial and angular resolution on either side of the image , and can easily be accounted for from the known geometry of the experiment .
we find that the images are symmetric after correction for the doppler effect ; no indications were found that collision induced alignment plays a significant role for the inelastic channels studied here . a detection bias for low laboratory recoil velocities results in an additional image intensity correction factor that is equal on either side of the image .
after correction , the symmetric images allow for the use of inverse abel transformation methods to enhance the resolution further . using the basex suite of programs @xcite , images as shown in figure [ fig : abel - data]_a _ and _
b _ are obtained for the two scattering systems .
the oscillatory structure is retrieved with a much higher resolution , as is also clear from the three - dimensional representation of the data shown in panels _ c _ and _ d_. figure [ fig : curves ] shows the angular intensity distributions ( red curves ) that are inferred from the experimental image intensities within a narrow annulus around the rims of the images .
the dcss at the mean collision energies of the experiment , that are predicted by high level _ ab initio _ quantum mechanical close - coupling ( qm cc ) calculations that use the most recent no - ne and no - ar pess presently available @xcite , are shown as well ( black dashed curves ) .
the experimentally obtained scattering distributions are fully consistent with the dcss predicted by theory . in particular the angles at
which diffraction peaks are found are in excellent agreement with the theoretical predictions . by definition ,
the theoretical dcss presented in figure [ fig : curves ] predict the angular distributions that would be measured in the ` perfect ' experiment in which no beam spreads or other factors that limit experimental resolution are present .
it is seen that in our experiments , beam spreads and other experimental factors reduce the visibility of the diffraction structure by about a factor 2 - 3 only .
we estimate the angular resolution of the experiment by convoluting the dcss predicted by the qm cc calculations with a gaussian distribution of variable width .
best agreement with the experimental distributions is found for widths ( @xmath16 ) of 0.45@xmath1 and 0.35@xmath1 for no - ne and no - ar , respectively .
the observed diffraction structure is an excellent proxy for the quality of computed pess .
for the @xmath17 channel of no - ar , there is one specific peak observed at @xmath18 , as indicated by the green arrow , that appears to be extremely sensitive to the exact details of the pes .
this is illustrated in figure [ fig : small - peak]_a _ that shows the scattering intensity around forward scattering for no - ar on an enlarged scale .
the experimentally obtained distribution is compared with the distributions that are expected from two different no - ar pess : one developed by cybulski _
et al .
_ in 2012 and one by alexander from 1999 @xcite .
both potentials are of high quality , but minor differences in calculation methodology and fitting procedures result in two slightly different pess , as illustrated in panel _
b_. it is seen that the existence of this peak in the dcs is predicted by only one of the pess , indicating that the level of precision reached in our experiments is sufficient to discriminate between the most state - of - the - art theoretical methods presently available .
surprisingly , our experiments show best agreement with the oldest pes used . in this letter
, we have shown that in crossed beam scattering experiments , the ability to resolve structures in dcss can be significantly enhanced using a beam crossing angle of 180@xmath1 . for scattering angles around forward scattering , the contribution of the velocity spread of the beam(s ) to the angular resolution
is effectively eliminated .
the beneficial kinematics afforded by the counterpropagating geometry allows for the use of inverse abel transformation methods , facilitating the measurement of dcss with high sensitivity and angular resolution .
this allows for the observation of detailed structures in the dcss that provide unique and stringent tests to gauge the quality of pess and quantum scattering calculations .
our approach appears particularly beneficial in scattering experiments that employ stark - decelerated beams , but crossed beam experiments using two conventional beams may also benefit from a 180@xmath1 crossing angle .
it is noted that the arguments outlined here for a counterpropagating geometry also hold for merged beam scattering , i.e. , experiments that use a beam crossing angle of 0@xmath1 @xcite .
this offers prospects for achieving optimal image resolutions in experiments that aim for low collision energies ; an interesting approach to probe dcss at collision energies where the scattering is dominated by quantum scattering resonances . | this work is part of the research program of the foundation for fundamental research on matter ( fom ) , which is financially supported by the netherlands organisation for scientific research ( nwo ) .
s.y.t.v.d.m . acknowledges support from nwo via a vidi and a top grant , and from the european research council via a starting grant .
we thank sean gordon for assistance during a research visit and david parker for fruitful discussions .
the expert technical support by leander gerritsen , chris berkhout , peter claus , niek janssen and andr van roij is gratefully acknowledged . | work part research program foundation fundamental research matter supported by netherlands organisation scientific research nwo acknowledges support nwo vidi top grant european research council starting grant thank sean gordon david parker discussions technical support leander gerritsen chris berkhout peter claus niek janssen andr van roij acknowledged | 0.067882 | 130 | 65 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,609 | quantum - speed - limit ( qsl ) time captures the intrinsic minimal time interval for a quantum system evolving from an initial state to a target state . in single qubit open systems
, it was found that the memory ( non - markovian ) effect of environment plays an essential role in shortening qsl time or , say , increasing the capacity for potential speedup . in this paper
, we investigate the qsl time for multiqubit open systems .
we find that for a certain class of states the memory effect still acts as the indispensable requirement for cutting the qsl time down , while for another class of states this takes place even when the environment is of no memory .
in particular , when the initial state is in product state @xmath0 , there exists a sudden transition from no capacity for potential speedup to potential speedup in a memoryless environment .
in addition , we also display evidence for the subtle connection between qsl time and entanglement that weak entanglement may shorten qsl time even more . | quantum - speed - limit ( qsl ) time @xcite , the intrinsic minimal time interval for a quantum system evolving from an initial state to a target state , is of crucial importance in the fields of quantum computation quantum computer , quantum control control1,control2,control3,control4,control5 , quantum metrology metrology , metrology1,metrology2 , and non - equilibrium thermodynamics thermo .
recent decades have witnessed a great deal of research on qsl time both in closed @xcite and open systems @xcite . in particular , a qsl time based on the schatten @xmath1 norm for an arbitrarily driven open system was presented by deffner and lutz @xcite @xmath2}{\min \left\ { e_{1}^{\tau } , e_{2}^{\tau } , e_{\infty } ^{\tau } \right\ } } , \label{qsl}\ ] ] where @xmath3 denotes the bures angle between the initial state @xmath4 and the target state @xmath5 , which is governed by the time - dependent master equation @xmath6 ( @xmath7 is a superoperator ) .
it is reasonable to employ the bures angle above as a measure for distance between an pure state and a mixed state , since the important riemannian feature is satisfied under such a circumstance @xcite .
the denominator @xmath8 in eq .
( [ qsl ] ) represents the average of @xmath9 over actual driving time duration @xmath10 , i.e. , @xmath11 .
one important application of the qsl time is to evaluate the speed of quantum evolutions under the following two scenarios : ( i ) .
the fastest evolution appears when the actual driving time @xmath10 achieves the qsl time @xmath12 , i.e. , @xmath13 for slower evolutions , @xmath14 and the slower the evolution , the higher ratio @xmath15 should be .
this point of view is clear and unambiguous and has been widely utilized in the field of entanglement assisted speedup of quantum evolutions @xcite .
( ii ) . from another point of view
, @xmath16 indicates the evolution is already the fatest , and possesses no potential capacity for further acceleration , while for @xmath17 the higher ratio @xmath18 ( or equivalently , the much shorter @xmath12 ) , the greater the capacity for potential speedup will be .
this viewpoint has been adopted in exploring the memory effect , characterized by non - markovianity @xcite , on the speed of quantum evolution qslopen3,xu1,xu2 .
it is found that in the damped jaynes - cummings model of a single qubit , the transition from no potential capacity of speedup ( @xmath19 ) to potential speedup ( @xmath14 ) , or say a reduction of qsl in quantum evolution is just the critical point when the memoryless environment becomes of memory @xcite .
furthermore , if evolution of a qubit is already along the qsl time which means its fastest speed in nature environment , the study on it will probably not so urgent as the case of @xmath14 which have speedup potential .
although the memory effect of environment plays a decisive role in the potential acceleration of quantum evolution in a single qubit case , the question may arise whether it will still be true even in multi - qubit cases .
this question is of particular interest , for the qsl time of multi - qubit open systems has now caught increasing attention and several interesting phenomena were discovered . for instances , with the qsl time defined in ref .
( @xcite ) , taddei _
et al_. illustrated that the separable states of a multi - qubit system under markovian dephasing channels perform the same speedup of quantum evolution as the entangled states when the number of qubits is large enough .
on the other hand , del campo _ et al . _ demonstrated , with the bound introduced in ref .
( @xcite ) , that multi - qubit greenberger - horne - zeilinger ( ghz ) states and separable states under markovian and non - markovian dephasing are equivalent in metrological parameter estimation @xcite . in this paper , mainly focused on scenario 2 , we show that for a class of multiqubit states memory effect is a requisite for raising potential ability of speeding up quantum evolution , while for another class of multi - qubit states , memoryless environment is ready to realize the above result .
especially when the open system is initially prepared in product state @xmath20 a transition from no potential capacity for speedup to possess speedup ability is achieved .
the paper is organized as follows : in sec .
ii , we present the qsl time for typical two - qubit , three - qubit , and n - qubit states , respectively .
discussion on the role of entanglement in qsl time is performed in sec .
finally , conclusions are drawn in sec . iv .
we consider n independent two - level atoms ( open system ) each locally coupling to a leaky vacuum cavity ( environment ) .
the dynamics of the multi - qubit open system is fully determined by each pair of atom cavities @xcite with the following hamiltonian @xcite @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the resonant transition frequency of the atom between the excited state @xmath23 and the ground state @xmath24 , and @xmath25 are the pauli raising and lowering operators . @xmath26 and @xmath27 denote the frequency and the annihilation(creation ) operators of the @xmath28th mode of the cavity with @xmath29 the corresponding real coupling constant .
the master equation for the reduced density matrix of the atom in the schrdinger picture is given by @xmath30 with @xmath31 + \gamma _ { t}\left ( { \sigma } _ { + } { \sigma } _ { -}\rho _ { t}+\rho _ { t}{\sigma } _ { + } % { \sigma } _ { -}-2{\sigma } _ { -}\rho _ { t}{\sigma } _ { + } \right ) , \label{master equation}\]]where @xmath32=im@xmath33 and @xmath34=re@xmath35 are the time - dependent lamb shift and decay rate respectively , and @xmath36 is the decoherence function relying on the particular structure of cavity reservoirs @xcite . the reduced density matrix of the atom with an initial state @xmath37 takes the form @xmath38 , \label{density matrix}\ ] ] where the excited state population @xmath39 is denoted by @xmath40 in the following .
as the exact form of qsl time for a general pure initial state is cumbersome , we only consider two typical bell - type initial states respectively , i.e. , @xmath41 and @xmath42 with @xmath43 $ ] . according to the definition of qsl time in eq .
( [ qsl ] ) , we have @xmath44for state @xmath45 and @xmath46 for state @xmath47 , where @xmath48 of a two - qubit open system under a memoryless environment as a function of @xmath49 with initial states @xmath50 ( black dotted line ) , @xmath51 ( red solid curve ) , and @xmath52 @xmath53 ( blue dashed curve ) .
the red circle indicates the maximal speedup of quantum evolution for state @xmath54,width=336 ] obviously , the qsl time ratio @xmath12 of state @xmath55 is the same as the exact form in single qubit cases discovered in refs @xcite , where the reduction in qsl time ( @xmath56 ) only occurs when the environment is of memory ; otherwise the evolution will always be along the qsl time ( @xmath57 ) . in order to illustrate this phenomenon clearly , the qsl time ratio @xmath15 of initial state @xmath55 ( black dotted line )
is depicted in fig . 1 under a memoryless environment , i.e. , @xmath58 with the population @xmath40 monotonically decreasing from 1 to the target @xmath59 .
however , a complex but interesting phenomenon appears for initial state @xmath60 : qsl reduction can also take place even when the environment is of no memory . for instances , @xmath15 versus @xmath59 of initial states
@xmath61 ( red solid curve ) and @xmath62 @xmath63 ( blue dashed curve ) are depicted , respectively , in fig .
1 , where @xmath64 clearly illustrates the intrinsic acceleration potential of quantum evolution under a memoryless environment . especially , there exists a sudden change point in qsl time with the critical point @xmath65 for initial state @xmath66 @xmath67 . to explain this phenomenon ,
we trace back to @xmath68 defined in eq .
( [ qsl ] ) with the following expression @xmath69 where we have employed the condition of memoryless environment @xmath70 therefore , the qsl time ratio @xmath15 of eq .
( [ qsl2 - 2 ] ) can be conveniently calculated as @xmath71one may check that @xmath72 is always satisfied .
in particular , when the initial state is in @xmath73 , the qsl time ratio yields @xmath74the sudden change point of qsl time is therefore justified . in this subsection
, we also consider two typical three - qubit states , i.e. , w type state @xmath75for state @xmath76 and @xmath77 for state @xmath78 , where @xmath79 equation ( [ qsl3 - 1 ] ) bears a resemblance to the case of state @xmath80 , implying that the reduction in qsl only occurs in a memory environment . as for eq .
( [ qsl3 - 3 ] ) , we consider a special case , i.e. , @xmath81 under the environment of no memory ( @xmath82 ) . therefore ,
( qsl3 - 3 ) can be simplified as : @xmath83 indicating that there also exists a sudden transition of speedup potential of quantum evolution even the environment is of no memory .
in this subsection , we show that the above phenomena are ubiquitous in n - qubit cases ( n is an arbitrary positive integer ) .
it is easy to check that if the n - qubit open system is initially prepared in state @xmath84 with @xmath85 the qsl ratio is exactly the same as eqs .
( [ qsl2 - 1 ] ) and ( [ qsl3 - 1 ] ) .
therefore , the memory effect of environment becomes the essential condition for the speedup potential emerge in quantum evolution .
however , if the initial state is in @xmath86 , the qsl ratio is given by @xmath87 in particular when the environment is memoryless , i.e. , @xmath88 eq .
( [ qsln-1 ] ) reduces to @xmath89clearly , @xmath65 is the critical point at which the open system experiences the sudden change of qsl time under a memoryless environment . equation ( [ qsln-2 ] ) also implies that there exists a maximal acceleration potential condition for state @xmath90 when @xmath91 , and the corresponding minimal qsl time ratio is given by : @xmath92 especially when @xmath93 , eq .
( [ maximal speedup ] ) grows to @xmath94 , which is marked in fig . 1 as the red circle . of a lorentzian spectral distribution model versus coupling strength @xmath95
the black dotted , red solid , and blue dashed curves represent the two - qubit initial states @xmath96 , @xmath97 , and @xmath98 @xmath99 , respectively , with parameters @xmath100 , @xmath101 , and @xmath102,width=336 ] in this subsection , we intend to show that memory effect of environment is still an important element for quantum acceleration potential for multi - qubit open systems .
the memory environment we consider here is characterized by the lorentzian spectral distribution @xmath103 , where @xmath104 is the markovian decay rate and @xmath105 is the spectral width @xcite .
@xmath40 is now written as @xcite@xmath106where @xmath107 . in fig .
2 , we take two - qubit initial states as an example and fix the driving time as @xmath108the qsl time ratio @xmath15 versus coupling strength @xmath109 is plotted with three typical two - qubit states @xmath110 ( black dotted line ) , @xmath111 ( red solid curve ) , and @xmath112 ( blue dashed curve ) , respectively , with @xmath113 , @xmath114 , and we set @xmath115 . according to ref .
( book open ) , we know that @xmath116 is the transient point from memoryless environment ( @xmath117 ) to one of memory ( @xmath118 ) . as is clearly shown in fig .
2 , more capacity for potential speedup will take place when the environment enters the memory region .
considering that the qsl time for multiqubit systems can be shortened in a memoryless environment , it is natural to link this phenomenon to entanglement , which only exists in multiqubit cases . in closed composite systems
, entanglement has been taken as a resource in the speedup of quantum evolution [ @xcite ] . in this subsection
, we go a step further to the connection between entanglement and qsl time in bipartite open systems .
the initial state we consider here is an arbitrary pure state : @xmath119 with @xmath120 which is generated by monte carlo method , and the related entanglement is characterized by concurrence @xmath121 in ref .
@xcite , with @xmath122 for a disentangled state and @xmath123 for a maximally entangled state . as a distribution of concurrence @xmath121 for 20000 randomly generated initial pure states ( tiny blue dots ) under the damping model .
the dark red and light green dots represent qsl time ratio with states @xmath124 and @xmath125 respectively.,width=336 ] in fig . 3 ,
20000 random pure states are generated by monte carlo sampling @xcite and their qsl ratios @xmath15 and their qsl time ratios @xmath15 under memoryless environments versus concurrence are marked by tiny blue dots . as is clearly displayed in fig .
3 , the lower bound @xmath16 can always be reached by states @xmath126 ( dark red dots in fig .
3 ) , implying that the concurrence has nothing to do with @xmath18 under this circumstance .
in addition , the upper bound is taken by a subset of states @xmath127 conclusion ---------- in summary , we have explored the quantum - speed - limit time for multi - qubit open systems . for a certain class of initial states , we have demonstrated that the quantum evolution can also be accelerated in a memoryless ( markovian ) environment .
moreover , we have found that entanglement plays a subtle role in the speedup of quantum evolution : weak entanglement may be better for speeding up quantum evolution under certain circumstances .
we have only treated non - correlated environments in this paper .
it will also be of importance and interest to study the qsl time of multi - qubit systems with the presence of initial correlations among the subsystems of composite environments @xcite .
this work was supported by the national natural science foundation of china ( grants no .
11204196 and no . 11074184 ) , the specialized research fund for the doctoral program of higher education ( grant no .
20123201120004 ) , and the priority academic program development of jiangsu higher education institutions . | quantum - speed - limit ( qsl ) time @xcite minimal time interval for quantum system evolving from initial to target state in quantum computation computer control metrology non - equilibrium thermodynamics recent decades research on qsl time in closed and open systems qsl time based on schatten @xmath1 norm for arbitrarily driven open system presented by deffner and lutz @xmath3 denotes bures angle between initial state @xmath4 and target state @xmath5 governed by time - dependent master equation @xmath6 @xmath7 superoperator reasonable to employ bures angle as measure for distance between pure and mixed state riemannian feature satisfied denominator @xmath8 qsl represents average of @xmath9 over actual driving time duration @xmath10 application of qsl time evaluate speed of quantum evolutions under scenarios fastest evolution when actual driving time @xmath10 achieves qsl time @xmath12 slower evolutions slower evolution higher ratio @xmath15point of view clear utilized in entanglement assisted speedup quantum evolutions @xmath16 indicates evolution fatest no potential capacity for acceleration @xmath17 higher ratio @xmath18 shorter @xmath12 ) greater capacity for potential speedup viewpoint adopted in exploring memory effect non - markovianity on speed quantum evolution in damped jaynes - cummings model single qubit transition from no potential capacity speedup @xmath19 to potential speedup @xmath14 ) reduction of qsl evolution critical when memoryless environment becomes memory if evolution qubit along qsl time fastest speed in nature environment study not urgent as @xmath14 speedup potential memory effect environment decisive in potential acceleration quantum evolution in single qubit case question may true in multi - qubit cases qsl time of multi - qubit open systems increasing attention interesting phenomena discovered taddei illustrated separable states of multi - qubit system under markovian dephasing channels perform same speedup quantum evolution as entangled states when number of qubits large enough del campo _ et al demonstratedmulti - qubit greenberger - horne - zeilinger states separable states under markovian non - markovian dephasing equivalent in metrological parameter estimation paper focused on scenario 2 multiqubit states memory effect requisite for speeding quantum evolution another memoryless environment ready result open system prepared in product state transition from no potential capacity for speedup to speedup ability achieved paper organized qsl time for two - three - n - qubit states discussion on role entanglement in qsl time conclusions drawn consider n independent two - level atoms coupling to leaky vacuum cavity dynamics of multi - qubit open system determined by atom cavities hamiltonian @xmath22 resonant transition frequency atom between excited state ground state raising and lowering operators @xmath26 @xmath27 denote frequency annihilation operators of @xmath28th mode of cavity @xmath29 real coupling constantmaster equation for reduced density matrix atom in schrdinger picture by @xmath30 with @xmath31 + \gamma\left \sigma -}\rho+\rho\sigma\rho\right equation @xmath32=im@xmath33 @xmath34=re@xmath35 time - dependent lamb shift decay rate @xmath36 decoherence function structure cavity reservoirs reduced density matrix atom with initial state @xmath37 form @xmath38 excited state population @xmath39 denoted by @xmath40 exact form qsl time for initial state cumbersome consider two typical bell - type initial states @xmath41 and @xmath42 with @xmath43 definition qsl time @xmath44for state @xmath45 @xmath46 for state @xmath47 @xmath48 two - qubit open system under memoryless environment function of @xmath49 with initial states @xmath50 black dotted line @xmath51 red solid curve @xmath53 blue dashed curvered circle indicates maximal speedup quantum evolution state @xmath54 qsl time ratio @xmath12 state @xmath55 same as single qubit cases refs @xcite reduction qsl time @xmath56 occurs when environment memory evolution along qsl time @xmath57 ) qsl time ratio @xmath15 state @xmath55 depicted in fig . 1 under memoryless environment population @xmath40 decreasing from 1 to @xmath59 complex initial state @xmath60 qsl reduction no memory @xmath15 versus @xmath59 initial states @xmath61 depicted in fig . 1 @xmath64 illustrates acceleration potential quantum evolution under memoryless environment sudden change point in qsl time with critical point @xmath65 for initial state @xmath66 @xmath67 trace back to @xmath68 defined @xmath69 condition memoryless environment qsl time ratio @xmath15 of eq . [ qsl2 - 2 ] calculated as @xmath71one @xmath72 always satisfied initial state @xmath73 qsl time ratio yields sudden change point qsl time justifiedconsider two three - qubit states @xmath75for @xmath77 @xmath79 equation ( [ qsl3 - 1 ] ) @xmath80 reduction in qsl occurs memory environment eq. ( [ qsl3 - 3 ] ) special case @xmath81 no memory @xmath82 ( qsl3 - 3 ) simplified as @xmath83 sudden transition speedup potential quantum evolution no memory phenomena ubiquitous in n - qubit cases n - qubit open system prepared @xmath84 @xmath85 qsl ratio same as eqs ( [ qsl2 - 1 ] ) [ qsl3 - 1 ] ) memory effect essential for speedup potential quantum evolution initial state @xmath86 qsl ratio given by @xmath87 when environment memoryless @xmath88 [ qsln-1 ] reduces to @xmath65 critical point open system sudden change of qsl time under memoryless environment equation ( [ qsln-2 ] ) implies maximal acceleration potential @xmath90 @xmath91 minimal qsl time ratio given by @xmath92 @xmath93maximal speedup grows to @xmath94 marked fig . 1 red circle lorentzian spectral distribution model versus coupling strength @xmath95 black red blue curves represent two - qubit initial states @xmath96 parameters @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 memory effect environment important for quantum acceleration multi - qubit systems memory environment characterized by lorentzian spectral distribution @xmath103 @xmath104 markovian decay rate @xmath105 spectral width @xcite @xmath40 written as @xcite@xmath106where @xmath107 . 2 two - qubit initial states driving time as @xmath108the qsl time ratio @xmath15 versus coupling strength @xmath109 plotted with three two - qubit states @xmath110 @xmath112 @xmath113 @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116 transient point from memoryless environment to memory @xmath118 more capacity speedup when environment enters memory region qsl time for multiqubit systems shortened in memoryless environment link to entanglement exists in multiqubit casesclosed composite systems entanglement resource quantum evolution connection between entanglement qsl time bipartite open systems initial state arbitrary pure state @xmath119 with @xmath120 generated by monte carlo method related entanglement concurrence @xmath121 @xmath122 disentangled @xmath123 maximally entangled state distribution of concurrence @xmath121 for 20000 randomly generated initial pure states tiny blue dots damping model dark red light green dots represent qsl time ratio with states @xmath124 and @xmath125 fig . 3 20000 random pure states generated by monte carlo sampling qsl ratios @xmath15 under memoryless environments concurrence marked by tiny blue dots lower bound @xmath16 reached by states @xmath126 dark red dots concurrence nothing with @xmath18 upper bound taken by subset states @xmath127 explored quantum - speed - limit time for multi - qubit open systems quantum evolution accelerated in memoryless environment entanglement subtle role speedup quantum evolution weak entanglement better evolution certain circumstances treated non - correlated environmentsstudy qsl time multi - qubit systems initial correlations subsystems composite environments work supported national natural science foundation china grants 11204196 11074184 specialized research fund doctoral program higher education grant 20123201120004 priority academic program development jiangsu higher education institutions | 0.562236 | 3,473 | 1,780 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,614 | some of the potential capabilities and design challenges of muon colliders are illustrated using self - consistent collider parameter sets at center of mass energies ranging from 0.1 tev to 100 tev . | the main motivation for research and development efforts on muon collider technology is the assertion that affordably priced muon colliders might provide lepton - lepton collisions at much higher center of mass ( com ) energies than is feasible for electron colliders , and perhaps eventually explore the spectrum of elementary particles at mass scales inaccessible even to hadron colliders .
this paper attempts to present some justification for these assertions through discussion and evaluation of the self - consistent muon collider parameter sets given in table 1 , at com energies ranging from 0.1 to 100 tev .
the parameter set at 0.1 tev com energy was included as a lower energy reference point and was constrained to essentially reproduce one of the sets of parameters currently under study[1 ] by the muon collider collaboration ( mcc ) .
in contrast , the other parameter sets represent speculation by the author on how the parameters might evolve with com energy and they have not been studied or discussed in detail within the mcc .
the parameter sets in table 1 were generated through iterative runs of a stand - alone fortran program , lumcalc .
the parameter sets are calculated from the input values for several input parameters namely , the com energy ( @xmath0 ) , the collider ring circumference ( c ) and depth below the earth s surface ( d ) , the beam momentum spread ( @xmath1 ) and 6-dimensional invariant emittance ( @xmath2 ) , the reference pole - tip magnetic field for the final focus quadrupoles ( @xmath3 ) , and the time until the beams are dumped ( @xmath4 ) and from the input of maximum allowable values for several other parameters namely , the bunch repetition frequency ( @xmath5 ) , the initial number of muons per bunch ( @xmath6 ) , the beam - beam tune disruption parameter ( @xmath7 ) , the beam divergence at the interaction point ( @xmath8 ) , the maximum aperture for the final focus quadrupoles ( @xmath9 ) , and maximum allowable neutrino radiation where the plane of the collider ring cuts the earth s surface . as a preliminary stage of calculation
, lumcalc makes any parameter adjustments that may be required to satisfy the input constraints .
these are , in order : 1 ) reducing @xmath8 to the limit imposed by @xmath9 ( based on scaling to existing final focus designs at 0.1 tev and 4 tev[1 ] ) , 2 ) reducing @xmath10 to attain an acceptable @xmath7 , and 3 ) reducing @xmath5 until the neutrino radiation is acceptable .
the output luminosity may be derived in terms of the input parameters as : @xmath11 } & = & { \rm 2.11 \times 10^{33 } \times h_b \times ( 1-e^{-2t_d[\gamma \tau_\mu ] } ) } \nonumber \\ & & \times { \rm \frac { f_b[s^{-1 } ] ( n_0[10^{12}])^2 ( e_{com}[tev])^3 } { c[km ] } } \nonumber \\ & & { \rm \times \left ( \frac{\sigma_\theta [ mr].\delta[10^{-3 } ] } { \epsilon_{6n}[10^{-12 } ] } \right ) ^{2/3 } } .\end{aligned}\ ] ] this formula uses the standard mcc assumption[1 ] that the ratio of transverse to longitudinal emittances can be chosen in the muon cooling channel to maximize the luminosity for a given @xmath2 .
the pinch enhancement factor , @xmath12 , is very close to unity ( see table 1 ) , and the numerical coefficient in equation 1 includes a geometric correction factor of 0.76 for the non - zero bunch length , @xmath13 ( the `` hourglass effect '' ) .
the physics motivation for each of the parameter sets in table 1 is discussed in [ 2 ] .
briefly , the number of @xmath14 events gives a benchmark estimate of the discovery potential for elementary particles at the full com energy of the collider , while the production of hypothesized 100 gev higgs particles indicates roughly how the colliders would perform in studying physics at this fixed energy scale .
further information on the important issue of neutrino radiation can be found in [ 3 ] .
the numbers given in table 1 come from an analytical calculation that is not intended to be accurate at much better than an order of magnitude level and that is deliberately conservative , i.e. it may well overestimate the radiation levels .
the radiation levels are predicted to rise approximately as the cube of the collider energy if other relevant parameters are held fixed ( up to some mitigating factors that come into play at the highest energies ) , rapidly becoming a serious design constraint for colliders at the tev scale and above .
the 1 tev parameter set of table 1 would give about the same luminosity as , for example , the design for the proposed nlc linear electron collider at the same energy , and the physics motivation and capabilities might be relatively similar[2,4 ] .
placement of the collider at 125 meters depth reduces the average neutrino radiation in the collider plane to less than one thousandth of the u.s .
federal off - site radiation limit ( 1 msv / year , which is of the same order of magnitude as the typical background radiation from natural causes ) .
nevertheless , attention would still need to be paid to minimizing the length , l , of any straight sections with low beam divergence , since these produce radiation hotspots with intensity proportional to l[3 ] .
the 4 tev parameter set was chosen as being at about the highest energy that is practical for a `` first generation '' muon collider on an existing laboratory site , due to neutrino radiation , and the muon current has been reduced to lower the radiation to the same level as the 1 tev parameter set , accepting the consequent loss in luminosity .
the 4 tev parameters may be compared to the mcc 4 tev design presented at snowmass96[5 ] , which did not take account of the neutrino radiation issue and hence attained a luminosity higher by more than an order of magnitude
. the lower bunch repetition rate of the current 4 tev parameter set makes some of the design parameters more relaxed than in the snowmass design , particularly in allowing a `` lite front end '' with relaxed rate specifications : the proton driver , pion production target and cooling channel . on the other hand , the desire to recover some of the lost luminosity motivates collider ring parameters that are slightly more aggressive , especially @xmath15 ( 3 mm reduced to 1.2 mm ) and @xmath8 ( 0.9 mrad increased to 1.6 mrad )
this entails a more difficult final focus design and also a more difficult task to shield the detector region from muon decay backgrounds . beyond com energies of a few tev
, it is probably necessary to build the colliders at isolated sites where the public would not be exposed to the neutrino radiation disk .
these will presumably be `` second generation '' machines , arriving after the technology of muon colliders has been established in one or more smaller and less expensive machines built at existing hep laboratories .
the gain from being able to relax the neutrino radiation constraint is evident in the 10 tev parameter set , with an exciting luminosity of @xmath16 at several times the discovery mass reach of the lhc hadron collider . from the progression of the parameter sets it is clear that the final focus design will become progressively more difficult with rising com energy .
consider , for example , the overall beam demagnification , @xmath17 , a dimensionless parameter that should be closely correlated with fractional tolerances in magnet uniformity , residual chromaticity etc .
for the 10 tev example , this has risen to approximately 31 000 in both the x and y coordinates , which as a very crude comparison that ignores considerable differences in the other final focus parameters happens to be approaching the y - coordinate value for both the 0.5 tev ( ia ) and 1.0 tev ( iia ) designs for the nlc linear collider ( i.e. 39 000 , with @xmath18 and @xmath19 ) [ 4 ] .
the spot size clearly indicative of vibration and alignment tolerances is also falling , but even at 100 tev it remains an order of magnitude above the spot size in the y coordinate for the nlc design parameters .
for perspective , then , the design of the final focus at 10 tev com energy may well still be less challenging than the design of the muon cooling channel , and the latter task is essentially independent of the collider energy ( up to assumed advances for later generation colliders ) .
the highest energy parameter set in table 1 , at 100 tev , clearly presents the most difficult design challenge , for several reasons : 1 ) cost reductions will be needed to make a machine of this size affordable , 2 ) siting will be more difficult than at 10 tev , since the neutrino radiation is now well above the u.s .
federal limit , 3 ) @xmath17 is almost an order of magnitude larger than at 10 tev , 4 ) the assumed @xmath20 is 25 times smaller than for the 10 tev parameters , albeit with much smaller bunches , so the assumed phase space density is nearly a factor of two larger , and finally 5 ) the beam power has risen to 170 mw , with synchrotron radiation rising rapidly to contribute a further 110 mw .
most of these extrapolations correspond to incremental advances in technology , particularly involving magnets : magnetic field strength ( for improved cooling and final focus , smaller accelerating rings and collider rings ) , stability and uniformity ( particularly for the final focus ) and cost reduction ( for the accelerating rings and collider rings ) .
hence , it is certainly not ruled out that such a parameter set could become achievable after a couple of decades of research and development dedicated to muon collider technology .
it has been shown that muon collider parameter sets at up to 10 tev com energy may well be realistic by today s standards of technology while muon colliders at the 100 tev energy scale require technological extrapolations that could perhaps be achievable within the relatively near - term future .
[ 1 ] the muon collider collaboration , `` status of muon collider research and development and future plans '' , to be submitted to phys
. rev . e. [ 2 ] b.j .
king , `` muon colliders : new prospects for precision physics and the high energy frontier '' , bnl cap-224-muon-98c , submitted to proc .
latin am . symp . on hep ,
april 8 - 11,1998 , san juan , puerto rico , ed .
available at http://pubweb.bnl.gov / people / bking/. [ 3 ] b.j .
king , `` a characterization of the neutrino - induced radiation hazard at tev - scale muon colliders '' , bnl cap-162-muon-97r , to be submitted for publication . [ 4 ] the nlc design group , `` zeroth - order design report for the next linear collider '' , lbnl - pub-5424 , slac report 474 , ucrl - id-124161 , may 1996 .
.self - consistent parameter sets for muon colliders .
the generation of these parameter sets is discussed in the text . except for the first parameter set , which has been studied in some detail by the muon collider collaboration , these parameters represent speculation by the author on how muon colliders might evolve with energy .
the beam parameters at the interaction point are defined to be equal in the horizontal ( x ) and vertical ( y ) transverse coordinates . [ cols=">,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] | motivation for research muon collider technology is assertion affordably priced muon colliders might provide lepton - lepton collisions at higher mass energies electron colliders explore elementary particles at mass scales inaccessible to hadron colliders paper justification assertions through self - consistent muon collider parameter sets in table 1 at energies 0.1 to 100 tev parameter set at 0.1 tev as lower energy reference point study by muon collider collaboration other parameter sets represent speculation on energy not studied discussed within mcc parameter sets generated through iterative runs fortran program lumcalc parameter sets calculated from input values for parameters com energy collider ring circumference depth below earth s surface beam momentum spread 6-dimensional invariant emittance reference pole - tip magnetic field for final focus quadrupoles time until beams dumped maximum allowable values for other parameters bunch repetition frequency initial number of muons per bunch beam - tune disruption parameter beam divergence at interaction point maximum aperture for final focus quadrupoles @xmath9 maximum allowable neutrino radiation where collider ring cuts earth s surface lumcalc makes parameter adjustments to satisfy input constraints reducing @xmath8 to limit @xmath9 scaling to final focus designs at 0.1 4 tev reducing @xmath10 to acceptable @xmath7 reducing @xmath5 until neutrino radiation acceptableoutput luminosity derived input parameters @xmath11 \rm 2.11 \times 10^{33 } 1-e^{-2t_d[\gamma \tau_\mu ]\nonumber { f_b[s^{-1 } n_0[10^{12}])^2 e_{com}[tev])^3 c[km\left{\sigma_\theta.\delta[10^{-3 } ] \epsilon_{6n}[10^{-12 } ] ^{2/3 }{aligned formula uses mcc assumption ratio transverse to longitudinal emittances chosen muon cooling channel maximize luminosity @xmath2 pinch enhancement factor @xmath12 close to unity table 1 numerical coefficient equation 1 includes geometric correction factor 0.76 non - zero bunch length @xmath13 hourglass effect physics motivation parameter sets table 1 discussed [ 2 ] @xmath14 events discovery potential elementary particles full energy collider production hypothesized 100 gev higgs particles indicates energy information neutrino radiation [ 3 ] numbers in table 1 from analytical calculation not accurate at magnitude deliberately conservative may overestimate radiation levels radiation levels to rise as collider energy if parameters fixed at design constraint for colliders at tev scale and above 1 tev parameter set same luminosity as proposed nlc linear electron collider at same energy motivation capabilities similar collider at 125 meters depth reduces average neutrino radiation to less than one thousandth of u federal off - site radiation limit ( 1 msv / year same as typical background radiation from natural causes attention length straight sections with low beam divergence produce radiation hotspots intensity proportional to l 4 tev parameter set chosen highest energy for first generation muon collider on due to neutrino radiation muon current reduced to radiation same as 1 tev parameter set accepting loss in luminosity 4 tev parameters compared to mcc 4 tev design at snowmass96 neutrino radiation issue attained luminosity higher by more than order of magnitudelower bunch repetition rate current 4 tev parameter set makes design parameters relaxed snowmass design lite front end relaxed rate specifications proton driver pion production target cooling channel desire recover lost luminosity motivates collider ring parameters aggressive especially @xmath15 3 reduced to 1.2 mm @xmath8 increased to 1.6 mrad difficult final focus design shield detector region from muon decay backgrounds necessary build colliders at isolated sites public not exposed neutrino radiation second generation machines after technology muon colliders established smaller less expensive machines hep laboratories gain from neutrino radiation constraint evident in 10 tev parameter set luminosity @xmath16 times discovery mass reach lhc hadron collider final focus design difficult with rising com energy overall beam demagnification , @xmath17 dimensionless parameter correlated with fractional tolerances magnet uniformity residual chromaticity 10 tev example risen to approximately 31 000 in x y coordinates approaching y - coordinate value for 0.5 tev 1.0 tev ( ) designs nlc linear collider 39 000 with @xmath18 @xmath19 )spot size indicative of vibration alignment tolerances falling at 100 tev remains above spot size in y coordinate for nlc design parameters design final focus at 10 tev com energy less challenging than muon cooling channel latter independent of collider energy highest energy parameter set in table 1 at 100 tev presents difficult design challenge for cost reductions needed machine affordable siting difficult neutrino radiation above u.s federal limit @xmath17 almost larger than at 10 tev assumed @xmath20 25 times smaller than 10 tev smaller bunches assumed phase space density nearly factor of two larger beam power risen to 170 mw synchrotron radiation rising further 110 mw extrapolations correspond to incremental advances in technology involving magnets magnetic field strength cooling smaller accelerating rings stability uniformity for cost reduction not parameter set could achievable after decades of research development to muon collider technology muon collider parameter sets at up to 10 tev com energy be realistic by today s standards technology at 100 tev energy scale require technological extrapolations achievable near - term futuremuon collider collaboration status research future plans submitted phys . rev . e b.j . king muon colliders prospects precision physics high energy frontier bnl cap-224-muon-98c submitted proc. latin am symp . april 8 - 11,1998 san juan puerto rico http://pubweb.bnl.gov / people bking b.j . king characterization neutrino - induced radiation hazard tev - scale muon colliders bnl cap-162-muon-97r submitted publication nlc design group zeroth - order design report next linear collider lbnl - pub-5424 slac report 474 ucrl - id-124161 may 1996 - consistent parameter sets muon colliders generation discussed text first parameter set studied speculation muon colliders evolve energy beam parameters interaction point equal horizontal vertical transverse coordinates | 0.432515 | 2,547 | 1,281 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,623 | we present results for the heavy quark potential computed in su(3 ) from magnetic monopoles and from center vortices .
the monopoles are identified after fixing su(3 ) lattice configurations to the maximal abelian gauge .
the center vortices are identified after using an indirect center gauge fixing scheme which we describe for su(3 ) .
z(3 ) center vortices are extracted and used to compute the potential .
the values of the string tensions from monopoles and vortices are compared to the full su(3 ) string tension .
epsf a clear understanding of the confinement mechanism in qcd is still elusive .
two particular mechanisms have gained the most attention : magnetic monopoles and center vortices . here
we present results of calculations in su(3 ) pure gauge theory of the heavy quark potential using methods which test these two different mechanisms . | the maximal abelian gauge is obtained in @xmath0 gauge theory by maximizing the lattice functional @xmath1,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath2 and @xmath3 are the diagonal generators of the fundamental representation of @xmath0 .
the maximization is done by performing local @xmath0 gauge transformations on the links , which in practice is done using an @xmath4 subgroup update@xcite .
once the maximal abelian gauge is obtained , two independent abelian gauge fields are projected out , leaving @xmath5 gauge fields .
magnetic monopoles are then identified in the abelian configurations .
the lattice monopoles are used to directly compute the heavy quark potential@xcite .
the indirect center gauge was used in the first lattice studies of projected center vortices in @xmath4@xcite .
the indirect center gauge is obtained in the following way .
a non - abelian lattice gauge configuration is fixed to the maximal abelian gauge .
abelian projection is performed obtaining the abelian subgroup configurations : in @xmath4 this procedure obtains @xmath6 gauge fields , while in @xmath7 it yields @xmath8^{n-1}$ ] gauge fields .
the remaining @xmath6 configurations are then gauge fixed so that the gauge fields are brought as close as possible to the elements of the center group of the original @xmath7 theory . for the case of @xmath4
this corresponds to maximizing @xmath9 where @xmath10 parameterizes the abelian links .
the maximization is obtained by iteratively performing @xmath6 gauge transformations .
the final step to extract the vortices involves another projection of the lattice gauge fields onto the group elements of @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the unit matrix . in @xmath0 after maximal abelian gauge fixing and projection is done , the links are elements of @xmath13
. the @xmath13 links can be parameterized by the matrix : @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath5 gauge transformations are then applied to these links to bring them as close as possible to the elements of the @xmath0 center group , @xmath16 the necessary gauge transformations can be parameterized using the fundamental , diagonal generators of @xmath0 : @xmath17 where some numerical factors are absorbed into the @xmath18 s and we use @xmath19 @xmath20 the center gauge in @xmath7 is obtained by maximizing the quantity @xmath21 for the indirect case in @xmath0 , this is accomplished by applying the @xmath5 gauge transformations described above to the diagonal @xmath13 links to maximize the quantity @xmath22 gauge transformations must be applied iteratively to each site independently to maximize the global quantity .
there are two local gauge conditions that must be met when the center gauge has been obtained .
the first condition comes from the @xmath23 contribution : @xmath24&=0,\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath25 is the lattice derivative @xmath26 the second gauge condition to be met comes from the @xmath3 contribution : @xmath27&=0.\end{aligned}\ ] ] numerically , neither term can actually be zero . in practice ,
numerical iterations are continued until both terms are on the order of @xmath28 . in the continuum
these two gauge conditions are equivalent to the landau gauge : @xmath29 @xmath30
we generated 400 equilibrium @xmath0 lattice configurations on a @xmath31 lattice with @xmath32 .
at this value of @xmath33 the correlation length is about 4 lattice spacings . using these configurations and smearing techniques@xcite we computed the heavy quark potential and measured the full @xmath0 string tension , @xmath34 .
we found @xmath35 .
next , the 400 configurations were fixed to the maximal abelian gauge and the two species of abelian fields@xcite were projected out .
overrelaxation was used with @xmath36@xcite . in each abelian configuration dirac strings
were located using the @xmath37 plaquettes and the two species of monopole configurations were obtained .
the monopole configurations were used to compute the heavy quark potential ( see fig .
( 2 ) below ) .
results for both monopole species were found to be the same .
the string tension from the potential computed using monopoles was found to be @xmath38 .
this is about @xmath39 lower than the full @xmath0 string tension @xmath34 .
we believe this is the first quantitative calculation of the su(3 ) string tension from monopoles , although hints that the monopole string tension is low have appeared before@xcite .
after gathering the abelian configurations , we next applied our abelian center gauge fixing algorithm .
no closed form solution of the parameters @xmath40 and @xmath41 could be found for the transcendental equations resulting from maximizing @xmath42 .
the @xmath18 s were determined iteratively .
the value of the normalized abelian trace computed from using the @xmath13 links was observed to change from an average value of 0.525 before center gauge fixing to 0.922 after gauge fixing . from the center gauge fixed configurations ,
the links were replaced by the @xmath43 phase each was closest to .
wilson loops were computed using the @xmath43 configurations .
the wilson loop data is presented in figure ( 1 ) .
fits to the potential computed using the @xmath43 wilson loops gave a string tension of @xmath44 .
thus , we find the string tension from indirect center projection to be too low . in figure ( 2 )
we compare the heavy quark potentials .
the potentials computed from the monopoles and projected center vortices show little coulomb behavior at small @xmath45 as compared to the full @xmath0 potential .
this has been observed in other calculations in @xmath4 and @xmath6@xcite .
calculations which demonstrate the confinement mechanism are not required to reproduce the short distance behavior of the potential , only the string tension .
we have presented results for the string tension computed using monopoles and center vortices .
the calculations use operations defined at the level of a single lattice spacing .
neither monopoles nor center vortices reproduce the full @xmath0 string tension .
there is still a need to refine the methods used here if one is to discard or accept monopoles or center vortices as the confinement mechanism in qcd .
we conclude by discussing possible reasons to suspect systematic errors exist in these calculations .
monopoles and vortices are computed using objects defined on the single link level .
the results for the string tension may be corrupted by unphysical degrees of freedom due to misidentification of monopoles and center vortices by using operators defined at the single link level .
also , we may not be using volumes large enough to suppress finite volume effects since monopoles and center vortices are objects that likely extend over many lattice spacings . to investigate the first problem
, we need to construct other methods for identifying monopoles and center vortices . for the second problem
we need to work on larger lattices .
using larger lattices is difficult due to the computationally intensive nature of the gauge fixing methods .
the numerical procedures for the maximal abelian and center gauge fixing suffer from gribov copy problems .
in particular , for the direct and indirect center gauge fixing procedures in @xmath4 the effects of gribov copies on the numerical value of the string tension are large@xcite .
the effect of taking account of the gribov ambiguity for @xmath4 for all cases investigated so far , is to decrease the corresponding string tension .
so for monopoles in the maximal abelian gauge , the monopole string tension for one gauge fix / configuration is quite close to the full @xmath4 value @xcite , and decreases by @xmath46 when account is taken of the gribov ambiguity by generating many copies / configuration @xcite .
our result for the @xmath0 monopole string tension is considerably lower than the full @xmath0 value even at one gauge fix / configuration , and would presumably be reduced somewhat more when gauge ambiguities are accounted for .
thus the @xmath4 and @xmath0 cases appear to be rather different . given the large noise level of our data , we did not succeed in extracting a string tension at the @xmath5 level , before projecting to monopoles or vortices .
given our low results for the monopole and center vortex string tensions , this is now an important quantity to measure . a failure of abelian projection at the @xmath13 level for @xmath0 would have important implications for ideas on confinement in @xmath0 .
we plan to return to this question in future work .
9 n. cabibbo and e. marinari , phys .
b119 ( 1982 ) 387 .
t. banks , r. myerson and j. kogut , nucl .
b 129 ( 1977 ) 493 .
john d. stack , steven d. neiman and roy j. wensley , phys .
d50 ( 1994 ) 3399 .
yoshimi matsubara , sawut ilyar , tsuyoshi okude , kenji yotsuji , tsuneo suzuki , nucl .
42 ( 1995 ) 529 - 531 . l. del debbio , m. faber , j. greensite , and s. olejnik , phys .
d55 ( 1997 ) 2298 .
the ape collaboration(m .
albanese et .
al ) , phys .
lett.*192b * ( 1 987 ) 163 .
k. yee , mod .
. lett . *
a * ( 1994 ) 1991 .
j. mandula and m. ogilvie , phys .
b * 248 * ( 1990 ) 156 .
t. okude , et .
al , nucl . phys .
* b533 * ( 1998 ) 576 j.d . stack and r.j .
wensley , nucl . phys .
* b371 * ( 1992 ) 597 .
bornyakov , d.a .
komarov , m.i .
polikarpov , a.i .
veselov , jetp lett .
71 ( 2000 ) 231 - 234 .
g. s. bali , v. bornyakov , m. muller - preussker , and k. schilling , phys .
d54 ( 1996 ) 2863 . | maximal abelian gauge obtained in @xmath0 theory maximizing lattice @xmath1 diagonal generators maximization @xmath0 gauge transformations on links @xmath4 subgroup update maximal gauge obtained two independent fields projected out leaving @xmath5 gauge fields magnetic monopoles identified in abelian configurations lattice monopoles compute heavy quark potential indirect center gauge used in studies @xmath4 non - abelian lattice gauge configuration fixed to maximal abelian gauge abelian projection abelian subgroup configurations @xmath4 obtains @xmath6 gauge fields @xmath7 @xmath8 gauge fields remaining @xmath6 configurations gauge fixed close to elements center group original @xmath7 theory maximizing @xmath9 @xmath10 parameterizes abelian links maximization iteratively performing @xmath6 gauge transformations final step projection lattice gauge fields onto group elements @xmath11 @xmath12 unit matrix in @xmath0 after maximal abelian gauge fixing projection links are elements of @xmath13@xmath13 links parameterized by matrix gauge transformations applied to links to elements @xmath0 center group necessary gauge transformations parameterized using diagonal generators of @xmath0 numerical factors absorbed into @xmath18 @xmath19 center gauge in @xmath7 obtained maximizing quantity @xmath21 indirect case @xmath0 @xmath5 gauge transformations to diagonal @xmath13 links quantity @xmath22 gauge transformations applied to each site maximize global quantity two local gauge conditions met when center gauge obtained first condition from @xmath23 contribution lattice derivative second condition from @xmath3 contribution neither term can be zero numerical iterations continued until both terms on order of @xmath28 two gauge conditions equivalent to landau gauge generated 400 equilibrium lattice configurations on @xmath31 lattice with @xmath32 correlation length 4 lattice spacings computed heavy quark potential measured full string tension found @xmath35 400 configurations fixed to maximal abelian gauge two species of abelian fields projected outoverrelaxation used @xmath36@xcite abelian configuration dirac strings located @xmath37 plaquettes two monopole configurations obtained monopole heavy quark potential fig 2 results both monopole species same string tension from potential monopoles @xmath38 @xmath39 lower than full @xmath0 string tension @xmath34 first quantitative calculation su(3 ) string tension from monopoles monopole string tension low before abelian configurations applied abelian center gauge fixing algorithm no closed form solution parameters @xmath40 @xmath41 transcendental equations maximizing @xmath42 @xmath18 s determined iteratively normalized abelian trace @xmath13 links 0.525 to 0.922 after links replaced by @xmath43 phase wilson loops computed @xmath43 configurations data figure ( 1 ) potential @xmath43 string tension @xmath44 string tension from indirect center projection too low figure 2 ) heavy quark potentials potentials monopoles center vortices show little coulomb behavior at small @xmath45 full @xmath0 potential observed calculations @xmath4 @xmath6@xcitecalculations confinement mechanism not required reproduce short distance behavior only string tension presented results string tension computed using monopoles center vortices calculations use operations single lattice spacing neither monopoles nor center vortices reproduce full @xmath0 string tension need to refine methods discard or accept monopoles center vortices as confinement mechanism in qcd systematic errors in calculations monopoles vortices computed using single link level results string tension may be corrupted by freedom due misidentification monopoles vortices may not using volumes large enough suppress finite volume effects monopoles center vortices extend over many lattice spacings need construct other methods for identifying monopoles center vortices second problem work on larger lattices difficult due to computationally intensive gauge fixing methods numerical procedures for maximal abelian center gauge fixing suffer from gribov copy problems effects of gribov copies on string tension large effect gribov ambiguity string tension monopoles maximal abelian gauge string tension for one gauge fix close to full value decreases by when gribov ambiguity many copies@xmath0 monopole string tension lower full value gauge fix reduced gauge ambiguities accounted @xmath4 @xmath0 cases different large noise level string tension @xmath5 level before projecting monopoles vortices low results monopole center vortex string tensions important quantity measure failure abelian projection @xmath13 level implications confinement plan return future work n. cabibbo e. marinari phys . b119 ( 1982 ) 387 t. banks . myerson j. kogut 129 ( 1977 ) 493 john d stack steven neiman roy wensley d50 ( 1994 ) 3399 yoshimi matsubara ilyar tsuyoshi okude yotsuji tsuneo suzuki 42 ( 1995 ) 529 - 531 l. del debbio. faber greensite s. olejnik. d55 ( 1997 ) 2298 ape collaboration albanese phys*192b 987 ) 163 1994 ) 1991 j. mandula m. ogilvie phys 248 1990 ) 156. okude phys b533 1998 ) 576 j stack r.jwensley nucl b371 1992 ) 597 bornyakov komarov polikarpov veselov jetp 71 2000 ) 231 - 234 bali bornyakov muller preussker schilling phys d54 1996 ) 2863 | 0.352575 | 2,349 | 1,176 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,635 | the paper deals with a polling game on a graph . initially ,
each vertex is colored white or black . at each round , each vertex is colored by the color shared by the majority of vertices in its neighborhood , at the previous round .
( all recolorings are done simultaneously ) .
we say that a set @xmath0 of vertices is a _ dynamic monopoly _ or _ dynamo _ if starting the game with the vertices of @xmath0 colored white , the entire system is white after a finite number of rounds .
peleg @xcite asked how small a dynamic monopoly may be as a function of the number of vertices .
we show that the answer is o(1 ) . | let @xmath1 be a simple undirected graph and @xmath0 a subset of @xmath2 .
consider the following repetitive polling game . at round 0 the vertices of @xmath0
are colored white and the other vertices are colored black . at each round , each vertex @xmath3 is colored according to the following rule . if at round @xmath4 the vertex @xmath3 has more than half of its neighbors colored @xmath5 , then at round @xmath6 the vertex @xmath3 will be colored @xmath5 .
if at round @xmath4 the vertex @xmath3 has exactly half of its neighbors colored white and half of its neighbors colored black , then we say there is a tie . in this case
@xmath3 is colored at round @xmath6 by the same color it had at round @xmath4 .
( peleg considered other models for dealing with ties .
we will refer to these models in section [ remarks ] .
additional models and further study of this game may be found at @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . )
if there exists a finite @xmath4 so that at round @xmath4 all vertices in @xmath2 are white , then we say that @xmath0 is a _ dynamic monopoly _ , abbreviated _
dynamo_. in this paper we prove [ main ] for every natural number @xmath7 there exists a graph with more than @xmath7 vertices and with a dynamic monopoly of 18 vertices .
we shall use the following notation : if @xmath8 then @xmath9 denotes the set of neighbors of @xmath3 .
we call @xmath10 the _ degree _ of @xmath3 . for every @xmath11
we define @xmath12 as a function from @xmath2 to @xmath13 , so that @xmath14 if @xmath3 is white at round @xmath4 and @xmath15 if @xmath3 is black at this round .
we also define @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19
( the small black circles are the vertices @xmath20 . ) ] [ jj ] let @xmath21 be the graph in figure 1 .
let @xmath22 and let @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
we construct a graph @xmath25 by duplicating @xmath7 times the vertices in @xmath26 .
that is , @xmath27 where @xmath28 \times d\ ] ] and @xmath29 \ } \nonumber \\ \cup \ { ( ( i , u),(i , v ) ) : ( u , v ) \in j , \ : u , v \in d , i \in [ n ] \ } \nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] ( here , as usual , @xmath30 $ ] denotes the set @xmath31 ) .
note that for reasons of symmetry , at a given round , all copies of a vertex in @xmath32 have the same color .
thus we may write `` @xmath33 is white at round 3 '' instead of `` @xmath34 is white at round 3 for every @xmath35 $ ] '' etc .
the following table describes the evolution of @xmath25 .
the symbol 1 stands for white and 0 stands for black .
note that the table does _ not _ depend on @xmath7 .
( this property is peculiar to the graph @xmath32 . in general graphs duplication of vertices may change the pattern of evolution of the graph ) .
@xmath36 the table shows that at round 20 the entire system is white and therefore @xmath0 is a dynamo .
the reader may go through the table by himself , but in order to facilitate the understanding of what happens in the table let us add some explanations as to the mechanism of `` conquest '' used in this graph .
we say that round @xmath37 _ dominates _ round @xmath38 if @xmath39 .
we shall make use of the following obvious fact : [ monotony ] if round @xmath37 dominates round @xmath38 ( @xmath40 ) then round @xmath41 dominates round @xmath42 . by applying this observation @xmath43 times
, we find that if round @xmath37 dominates round @xmath38 then round @xmath44 dominates round @xmath45 ( @xmath46 ) . by looking at the table
one can see that in the graph @xmath25 round 2 dominates round 0 and thus we have [ blinking ] round @xmath47 dominates round @xmath43 in @xmath25 for every @xmath48 we say that a vertex @xmath3 _ blinks _ at round @xmath4 if @xmath49 for every @xmath50 .
we say that a vertex @xmath3 is _ conquered _ at round @xmath4 if @xmath51 for every @xmath50 .
examining rounds @xmath52 to @xmath53 in the table and using corollary [ blinking ] one can see that @xmath54 and @xmath55 are conquered at round 0 , and in addition @xmath56 and @xmath33 are conquered at round 2 .
furthermore , every vertex in @xmath25 blinks either at round 1 or at round 2 .
finally , we have [ tieconquer ] if at round @xmath4 a vertex @xmath3 in @xmath25 has at least half of its neighbors conquered then @xmath3 is conquered at round @xmath57 . _
proof : _ every vertex in @xmath25 blinks either at round 1 or at round 2 , and hence @xmath3 is white either at round @xmath6 or at round @xmath57 . from this round on ,
at least half of the neighbors of @xmath3 are white , so @xmath3 will stay white .
@xmath58 now the vertices will be conquered in the following order : @xmath59 , @xmath60 , @xmath61 . eventually , the entire graph is colored white .
@xmath25 is a graph with @xmath62 vertices and @xmath0 is a dynamo of size 18 , proving theorem [ main ] .
the result of section [ proofmain ] gives rise to the following questions : does there exist an infinite graph with a finite dynamo ? the answer is _
no_. this follows from the following theorem : if @xmath0 is finite then @xmath63 is finite for all @xmath64 . moreover , every vertex in @xmath63 has a finite degree .
_ proof : _ the proof is by induction on @xmath4 . for @xmath65 the theorem is true because every vertex @xmath66 with an infinite degree becomes black at round 1 . for @xmath67 , if @xmath68 and @xmath3 has an infinite degree @xmath69 then by the induction hypotheses @xmath70 and @xmath71 .
hence @xmath72 and @xmath15 .
if @xmath73 has a finite degree then @xmath3 has a neighbor in @xmath74 . by the induction hypotheses
only finitely many vertices have such a neighbor , and thus @xmath63 is finite .
@xmath58 the next question deals with other models considered by peleg : [ 2 g ] do we still have a dynamo of size o(1 ) if we change the rules of dealing with ties ? ( e.g.
if a vertex becomes black whenever there is a tie . )
the answer here is _
yes_. if @xmath1 is a graph , introduce a new vertex @xmath75 for every @xmath8 and consider the graph @xmath76 where @xmath77 and @xmath78 if @xmath0 is a dynamo of @xmath79 according to the model in theorem [ main ] , then it is easy to prove that @xmath80 is a dynamo of @xmath81 .
but all vertices of @xmath81 have odd degrees , and thus ties are not possible and @xmath82 is a dynamo of @xmath81 according to _ any _ rule of dealing with ties .
therefore , for every @xmath83 the graph @xmath84 has a dynamo of size 36 .
let @xmath85 be a real number . consider the following model , which will henceforth be called _ the @xmath86-model_. at every round , for every vertex @xmath3 with @xmath87 neighbors colored black and @xmath88 neighbors colored white , if @xmath89 then @xmath3 is colored white at the next round , otherwise it is black . for the sake of simplicity
we will assume that @xmath86 is irrational and that there are no isolated vertices , so that @xmath90 is impossble .
the most interesting question regarding this model is whether there exist graphs with o(1 ) dynamo like in theorem [ main ] .
this question is as yet open .
we only have some partial results , which can be summarized as follows : 1 .
if @xmath86 is big enough then the size of a dynamo is @xmath91 .
2 . if @xmath86 is small enough then there exist graphs in which the size of a dynamo is @xmath92 .
if there exist graphs with o(1 ) dynamo then the number of rounds needed until the entire system becomes white is @xmath93 . for every @xmath96 ,
let @xmath97 be the set of edges with one vertex in @xmath98 and the other not in @xmath98 .
call @xmath99 .
note that @xmath100 is the set of vertices which are white at both round 0 and round 1 .
every @xmath101 is connected to at most @xmath102 vertices in @xmath103 and at most @xmath104 vertices outside of @xmath0 .
therefore we have @xmath105 let @xmath4 be fixed . by definition @xmath107 .
let @xmath108 , and let @xmath109 .
more than @xmath110 of the neighbors of @xmath3 are white at round @xmath4 and more than @xmath110 of the neighbors of @xmath3 are white at round @xmath111 . thus more than @xmath112 of the neighbors of @xmath3 belong to @xmath98 .
we therefore have @xmath113 which implies @xmath106 . by induction @xmath114 for all
if we begin with a dynamo then for some finite @xmath115 we have @xmath116 and @xmath117 @xmath58
let @xmath122 denote the sum of the degrees of the vertices in @xmath98 .
recall that every @xmath101 is white at both round 0 and round 1 , and thus @xmath123 and @xmath124 .
therefore , @xmath125 .
again , let @xmath4 be fixed , let @xmath126 be as in the proof of theorem [ rho3 ] and let @xmath109
. more than @xmath127 of the neighbors of @xmath3 are white at round @xmath4 and more than @xmath127 of the neighbors of @xmath3 are white at round @xmath111 . thus more than @xmath128
of the neighbors of @xmath3 belong to @xmath98 .
therefore , we have let @xmath136 be as defined in the answer to question [ 2 g ] .
construct @xmath137 by eliminating @xmath138 from @xmath136 and connecting @xmath139 to @xmath33 and @xmath140 ( but _ not _ to @xmath141 ) .
note that in @xmath137 the vertex @xmath141 is connected only to @xmath142 and to @xmath143 .
construct @xmath144 as in the construction of @xmath25 , where the duplicated vertices are all black vertices except for @xmath145 and @xmath146 .
( note that the graphs are constructed separately , namely , the sets of vertices of @xmath147 and @xmath148 are disjoint for @xmath149 . )
now connect the graphs in the following way .
first , eliminate the copies of @xmath150 from all graphs except for @xmath151 .
note that in @xmath147 there are @xmath152 copies of @xmath141 ( when @xmath153 ) . divide them into 32 disjoint sets @xmath154 , of size @xmath155 each .
now connect the vertices in @xmath156 to the copy of @xmath145 in @xmath157 , connect @xmath158 to the copy of @xmath146 , and connect each one of @xmath159 to a respective white vertex in @xmath157 ( see in figure 3 ) . .
the vertices under the numeral 1 are the 32 copies of @xmath141 in @xmath151 . under the numeral 2
are the 32 unduplicated vertices in @xmath160 ( @xmath145 , @xmath146 and the initiallly white vertices ) . under the numeral 3
are the 64 copies of @xmath141 in @xmath160 , under the numeral 4 are the 32 unduplicated vertices in @xmath161 , under the numeral 5 are the 128 copies of @xmath141 in @xmath161 , and so on . ] 1 .
all vertices of the obtained graph blink either at round 1 or at round 2 . 2 .
all vertices of @xmath162 are eventually conquered .
( the evolution of this conquest is similar to the one in theorem [ main ] . )
3 . if all copies of @xmath141 in @xmath147 are conquered at a certain round , then all vertices of @xmath157 are eventually conquered .
( again , the evolution is similar to the one in theorem [ main ] .
note that we need the bound @xmath163 in order to have @xmath145 and @xmath146 conquered . )
bermond and d. peleg , the power of small coalitions in graphs , _ proc .
2nd colloc .
on structural information and communication complexity _ , olympia , greece , june 1995 , carleton univ .
press , 173 - 184 . | @xmath1 undirected graph @xmath0 subset @xmath2 repetitive polling game round 0 vertices @xmath0 colored white other black each round vertex @xmath3 colored rule round @xmath4 vertex @xmath3 more than half colored @xmath5 round @xmath6 vertex @xmath3 colored @xmath5 if round @xmath4 vertex @xmath3 half white half black tie @xmath3 colored round @xmath6 same color round @xmath4 other models ties refer section [ remarks ] additional models study at @xcite @xcite finite @xmath4 round @xmath4 all vertices @xmath2 white @xmath0 dynamic monopoly _ prove natural number @xmath7 graph with more than @xmath7 vertices dynamic monopoly of 18 vertices notation @xmath8 @xmath9 denotes set neighbors of @xmath3 @xmath10 _ degree _ of @xmath3 @xmath11 @xmath12 function from @xmath2 to @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath3 white at round @xmath4 @xmath15 @xmath3 black rounddefine @xmath16 small black circles are vertices @xmath20 let @xmath21 be graph in figure 1 let @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 construct graph @xmath25 by duplicating @xmath7 times vertices in @xmath26 @xmath27 where @xmath28\times d @xmath29\nonumber i v v\nonumber\end{aligned} @xmath30 $ denotes set @xmath31 for symmetry at round all copies of vertex in @xmath32 have same color write @xmath33 is white at round 3 '' instead of @xmath34 white at round 3 for every @xmath35 $ table describes evolution of @xmath25 symbol 1 stands for white 0 for black table not depend on @xmath7 property peculiar to graph @xmath32 duplication of vertices may change pattern evolution @xmath36 table shows at round 20 entire system is white @xmath0 is dynamo facilitate understanding add explanations mechanism of `` conquest '' in graph round @xmath37 dominates round @xmath38 if @xmath39 fact monotony @xmath37 dominates @xmath38 @xmath41 dominates @xmath42 applying observation @xmath43 times @xmath37 dominates @xmath38 @xmath44 dominates @xmath45 graph @xmath25 round 2 dominates round 0 blinking @xmath47 dominates @xmath43 @xmath25 @xmath48 vertex @xmath3 blinks at @xmath4 @xmath49 @xmath50 vertex @xmath3 conquered at @xmath4 if @xmath51 @xmath50 examining rounds @xmath52 to @xmath53 @xmath54 and @xmath55 conquered at round 0 @xmath56 @xmath33 conquered at round 2 vertex @xmath25 blinks at round 1 or 2 tieconquer ] if round @xmath4 vertex @xmath3 half neighbors conquered @xmath3 conquered at round @xmath57 every vertex @xmath25 blinks round 1 or 2 @xmath3 white @xmath6 or @xmath57 half neighbors @xmath3 white @xmath3 white @xmath58 vertices conquered @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 entire graph colored white @xmath25 graph @xmath62 vertices @xmath0 dynamo size 18 proving theorem main ] result section proofmain infinite graph finite dynamo ? answer no follows theorem if @xmath0 finite @xmath63 finite for @xmath64 every vertex in @xmath63 finite degree proof induction on @xmath4 @xmath65 vertex @xmath66 infinite degree becomes black at round 1 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath3 infinite degree @xmath69 induction hypotheses @xmath70 @xmath71 hence @xmath72 @xmath15 @xmath73 finite degree @xmath3 neighbor in @xmath74 induction hypotheses many vertices have neighbor @xmath63 finite @xmath58 question dynamo size o(1 ) if change rules dealing ties ? vertex becomes black tie answer yes @xmath1 graph introduce new vertex @xmath75 @xmath8 consider graph @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath0 dynamo of @xmath79 easy prove @xmath80 dynamo of @xmath81 vertices @xmath81 have odd degrees ties not possible @xmath82 dynamo of @xmath81 rule ties@xmath83 graph @xmath84 has dynamo size 36 @xmath85 real number consider model @xmath86-model_ every round vertex @xmath3 with @xmath87 neighbors colored black @xmath88 white @xmath89 @xmath3 colored white next round otherwise black assume @xmath86 irrational no isolated vertices @xmath90 impossble question graphs with o(1 ) dynamo theorem question open partial results if @xmath86 big size dynamo is @xmath91 if @xmath86 small graphs size dynamo @xmath92 graphs with o(1 ) dynamo number rounds until system becomes white is @xmath93 @xmath96 @xmath97 set edges one vertex in @xmath98 other not @xmath98 call @xmath99 @xmath100 vertices white at round 0 and round 1 @xmath101 connected to @xmath102 vertices @xmath103 @xmath104 vertices outside @xmath0 @xmath105 let @xmath4 fixed @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath109 more than @xmath110 neighbors of @xmath3 white at round @xmath4 more neighbors white at round @xmath111@xmath112 neighbors @xmath3 belong @xmath98 @xmath113 implies @xmath106 induction @xmath114 dynamo @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath58 @xmath122 denote sum degrees vertices @xmath98 @xmath101 white at round 0 1 @xmath123 @xmath124 @xmath125 @xmath4 fixed @xmath126 theorem rho3 @xmath109 @xmath127 neighbors @xmath3 white round @xmath4 @xmath127 neighbors @xmath3 white @xmath111 more than @xmath128 neighbors @xmath3 belong @xmath98 @xmath136 defined answer question [ 2 g construct @xmath137 eliminating @xmath138 @xmath136 connecting @xmath139 to @xmath33 @xmath140 not @xmath141 @xmath137 vertex @xmath141 connected to @xmath142 @xmath143 construct @xmath144 @xmath25 duplicated vertices black except @xmath145 @xmath146 graphs constructed separately sets vertices @xmath147 @xmath148 disjoint for @xmath149 connect graphs eliminate copies @xmath150 graphs except @xmath151@xmath147 @xmath152 copies of @xmath141 @xmath153 divide into 32 sets @xmath154 @xmath155 each connect vertices @xmath156 to @xmath145 @xmath157 @xmath158 to @xmath146 @xmath159 to white vertex @xmath157 figure 3 vertices under numeral 1 32 copies @xmath141 in @xmath151 numeral 2 32 unduplicated vertices in @xmath160 numeral 3 64 copies @xmath141 @xmath160 numeral 4 32 unduplicated vertices @xmath161 numeral 5 128 copies @xmath141 in @xmath161 all vertices graph blink at round 1 or 2 vertices @xmath162 conquered evolution similar to theorem if all copies @xmath141 in @xmath147 conquered round all vertices @xmath157 conquered evolution similar need bound @xmath163 @xmath145 and @xmath146 conquered bermond and d. peleg power of small coalitions in graphs 2nd colloc on structural information communication complexity olympia greece june 1995 carleton univ. press 173 - 184 | 0.452761 | 3,179 | 1,764 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,638 | the leading lie generators , including the chromatic effects , due to hard - edge fringe field of single multipole and solenoid are derived from the vector potentials within a hamiltonian system .
these nonlinear generators are applied to the interaction region of pep - ii to analyze the linear errors due to the feed - down from the off - centered quadrupoles and solenoid .
the nonlinear effects of tune shifts at large amplitude , the synchro - betatron sidebands near half integer and their impacts on the dynamic aperture are studied in the paper . | pep - ii is an asymmetric b - factory that consists of two separate rings with different energies .
the electron and positron beams are brought into head - on collisions at the babar detector as shown in fig .
[ fig : pepii - ip ] . in order to separate the beams fast enough away from the interaction point ( ip ) to avoid the deteriorating effect on the luminosity due to adjacent parasitic collisions , the beams go through many strong magnets inside the solenoid with very large offsets from their center .
these offsets can be as large as a few centimeters as indicated in fig .
[ fig : pepii - ip ] .
the excursion of the design orbit introduces large uncertainty into the optics near the ip .
most problematic , the optics changes , as recently seen in the beam - beam experiments @xcite , when the local orbit varies .
an accurate optical model requires a map of three - dimensional magnetic field in the region . that is rather difficult to compute because of the overlapping fields and complicated geometry . as a first step
, we will use the hard - edge model for the fringe field to estimate the effects analytically in this paper .
the magnetic field of a single normal harmonics , including its fringe field , in the cylindrical coordinate is derived by bassetti and biscari @xcite . to study the single - particle effects of the fringe field using hamiltonian system , we need to know its corresponding vector potential . in the coulomb gauge , @xmath1 , the potential can be expressed as @xmath2 where @xmath3 for a skew multipole , the expression can be obtained by an exchange between sine and cosine . the coulomb gauge is chosen because its potential becomes the conventional multipole expansion . for the solenoid , due to its axial symmetry , it is more convenient to choose the axial gauge : @xmath5 .
the vector potential is given by @xmath6 the potential satisfies maxwell s equation @xmath7 .
any truncation of the series could violate maxwell s equation .
the magnetic field is given by @xmath8 .
in the cartesian coordinate system , the hamiltonian , using the distance @xmath9 as the independent variable for a charged particle moving in a static magnetic field , is given by @xcite @xmath10 where @xmath11 are scaled components of the vector potential along axis x , y , s , respectively ; @xmath12 are the transverse canonical momenta scaled by a reference momentum @xmath13 , @xmath14 , and @xmath15 is the path length .
we expand the square root in eq .
( [ eqn : h ] ) and keep only the first order of the vector potential , @xmath16 .
\label{eqn : hamiltonian}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this hamiltonian is used to compute the dynamical effects on the charged particles due to the fringe field .
taking a solenoid with field @xmath17 as an example and follow the method used by forest and milutinovic @xcite , we choose a hard - edge model @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the unit step function . using this model and the vector potential in eq .
( [ eqn : asolenoid ] ) , we have , @xmath20 and @xmath21 substituting these components into the hamiltonian in eq .
( [ eqn : hamiltonian ] ) , we obtain @xmath22 where @xmath23 and @xmath24 . after the standard manipulation of map and integration by parts @xcite
, we obtain the map @xmath25 : } = e^{:f_s : } , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath26\ ] ] here , @xmath27 $ ] and @xmath28 $ ] denotes the poisson bracket . note that @xmath29 is invariant under the two - dimensional rotation around the axis of the solenoid . similarly , for a dipole magnet , we start with @xmath30 and set @xmath31 in eq .
( [ eqn : amultipole ] ) to obtain the components of the vector potential of a dipole magnet as follows @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the magnetic field of the dipole .
the hamiltonian is derived by substituting the vector potential into eq .
( [ eqn : hamiltonian ] ) .
we have @xmath34 where @xmath35 , \nonumber \\ v_2 & = & -{x\over8\rho}(x^2+y^2),\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath36 and @xmath37 is the bending radius of the dipole magnet .
the final map is written as @xmath38 : } = e^{:f_d : } , \nonumber\ ] ] where , @xmath39.\ ] ] as a first - order kick and @xmath40 , it agrees with the expression found by papaphilippou , wei , and talman @xcite .
similar exercise can be carried out for a quadrupole magnet with @xmath41 .
the final map is given by @xmath42 where , @xmath43 .
\label{eqn : quadrupole}\ ] ] where @xmath44 and @xmath45 is the gradient .
@xmath46 agrees with the expression first found by forest and milutinovic . here
, the maps are derived for the raising edge of the magnet . for the falling edge ,
the maps are obtained by simply switching the sign of the lie generator of the map .
if there is a design off - axis orbit : @xmath47 and @xmath48 in the horizontal plane , the non - linear effects of the fringe field of a quadrupole magnet will feed down to linear optical errors . by substituting @xmath49 with @xmath50 and @xmath51 with @xmath52 into eq .
( [ eqn : quadrupole ] ) , and extracting the quadratic terms of @xmath53 , we find that the tune shifts are given by @xmath54 where @xmath55 and @xmath56 are the courant - snyder parameters at the position of the edge . for pep - ii ,
the estimated tune shifts in the vertical plane relative to the design orbit in the low energy ring are tabulated in table [ tab : tuneshift ] .
.tune shift from the quadrupole adjacent to the ip . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ tab : tuneshift ] note that the outside edges of the quadrupole contribute more because the excursions are larger .
these rather large optical effects are not currently included in our optical model .
the nonlinear fringe transformation at quadrupole edges has been recently implemented in the lego code @xcite .
based on eq .
( [ eqn : quadrupole ] ) , the fringe octupole - like field would generate an amplitude dependent tune shift and excite chromo - geometric octupole resonances .
these effects were observed in pep - ii dynamic aperture calculations . to maximize luminosity ,
the pep - ii horizontal tune is moved close to a half - integer .
however , the tune space in this region is limited by the effects of half - integer resonance and its synchrotron side bands .
the effect of the quadrupole resonances on pep - ii dynamic aperture had been observed in earlier tracking studies @xcite . in this case , the resonance condition is @xmath57 , where @xmath58 is the synchrotron tune . after including the nonlinear fringe in quadrupoles
, the tracking showed a reduction of dynamic aperture for off - momentum particles .
an example of dynamic aperture for pep - ii high energy ring ( her ) is shown in fig .
[ fig : aper ] . in this case , the @xmath59 her upgrade lattice @xcite is used where the ip beta functions and tunes are @xmath60 cm and @xmath61 .
the tracking included synchrotron oscillations , machine errors and various optics corrections . in fig .
[ fig : aper ] , the blue dotted lines show on - momentum dynamic aperture for 10 random error settings , the dash red lines correspond to relative momentum error of @xmath62 , and the solid ellipse shows the @xmath63 beam size for reference .
one can see that the fringe effect increases the on - momentum aperture but reduces the horizontal off - momentum aperture at .510 tune .
the on - momentum improvement is due to the fringe compensation of the amplitude dependent tune shift from sextupoles .
the off - momentum effect was attributed to the 1st octupole side band of the half - integer resonance excited by the fringe . in this case , the octupole resonance condition @xmath64 yields the resonance tune at @xmath65 . moving the tune away from this resonance to 28.518
restored the aperture above the @xmath63 size .
we have found a new lie generator for the hard - edge fringe due to a solenoid magnet . it is a fourth - order generator and gives an octupole - like kick to charge particles .
it can also provide additional x - y couplings through an off - centered orbit .
9 w. kozanecki _
_ , experimental study of crossing - angle and parasitic crossing effects at the pep - ii @xmath66 collider , " pac05 , these proceedings .
m. bassetti and c. biscari , pa * 52 * , 221 ( 1996 ) .
r. ruth , aip conference proceedings no .
153 , vol.1 p166 , m. month and m. dienes editors ( 1985 ) .
y. papaphilippou , j. wei , and r. talman , phys .
e * 67 * , 046502 ( 2003 ) .
e. forest and j. milutinovic , methods phys .
* a269 * , 474 ( 1988 ) . y. cai , _ et al .
_ , slac pub7642 ( 1997 ) .
y. cai , y. nosochkov , slac pub9812 ( 2003 ) .
y. cai , _ et al .
_ , slac pub9810 ( 2003 ) . | pep - ii asymmetric b - factory two rings different energies electron positron beams - collisions at babar detector in fig . pepii - ip separate beams from interaction point ip avoid effect luminosity beams go through strong magnets inside solenoid large offsets from center offsets few centimeters fig ip excursion design orbit introduces uncertainty optics near ip optics changes when local orbit varies accurate optical model requires map of three - dimensional magnetic field difficult to compute overlapping fields complicated geometry hard - edge model for fringe field to estimate effects magnetic field of single normal harmonics including fringe field cylindrical coordinate derived by bassetti and biscari @xcite study effects fringe field need corresponding vector potential coulomb gauge , @xmath1 potential expressed as @xmath2 @xmath3 skew multipole expression exchange between sine and cosine coulomb gauge chosen potential becomes conventional multipole expansion for solenoid axial symmetry convenient choose axial gauge : @xmath5 vector potential by @xmath6 satisfies maxwell s equation @xmath7 truncation could violate maxwell s equation magnetic field by @xmath8 cartesian coordinate system hamiltonian distance @xmath9 independent variable for charged particle in static magnetic field given by @xcite @xmath10 @xmath11 are scaled components of vector potential along axis x y s @xmath12 transverse canonical momenta scaled by reference momentum @xmath13 path length expand square root in eq keep first order of vector potential @xmath16 hamiltonian to compute dynamical effects on charged particles due to fringe field solenoid with field @xmath17 choose hard - edge model @xmath18 @xmath19 is unit step function using model vector potential @xmath20 @xmath21 substituting components into hamiltonian obtain @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 after standard manipulation integration obtain map @xmath25 = e^{:f_s @xmath26 @xmath27 and @xmath28 denotes poisson bracket@xmath29 invariant under two - rotation around axis solenoid dipole magnet start with @xmath30 set @xmath31 in eq . obtain vector potential dipole magnet @xmath32 @xmath33 magnetic field dipole hamiltonian derived substituting vector potential into eq @xmath34 @xmath35{x(x^2+y^2) @xmath36 @xmath37 bending radius dipole magnet final map @xmath38 @xmath39 first - order kick @xmath40 agrees with expression papaphilippou wei talman similar exercise quadrupole magnet with @xmath41 final map by @xmath42 @xmath43 quadrupole @xmath44 @xmath45 gradient @xmath46 agrees with expression forest milutinovic maps derived for raising edge magnet falling edge maps obtained switching sign of lie generator map design off - axis orbit @xmath47 @xmath48 in horizontal plane non - linear effects fringe field quadrupole magnet feed down to linear optical errors substituting @xmath49 with @xmath50 @xmath51 with @xmath52 into eq eqn quadrupole extracting quadratic terms @xmath53 tune shifts by @xmath54 courant - snyder parameters edge pep - ii estimated tune shifts vertical plane design orbit low energy ring tabulated in table tuneshift shift quadrupole adjacent outside edges quadrupole contribute more larger optical effects not included in model nonlinear fringe transformation at quadrupole edges implemented in lego code @xcite fringe octupole - field amplitude dependent tune shift chromo - geometric octupole resonances effects observed in pep - ii dynamic aperture calculations pep - ii horizontal tune moved to half - integer tune space limited by half - integer resonance synchrotron side bands effect quadrupole resonances on pep - ii dynamic aperture observed in earlier studies resonance condition is @xmath57 @xmath58 synchrotron tune nonlinear fringe in quadrupoles reduction dynamic aperture for off - momentum particles example dynamic aperture pep - ii high energy ring in fig .@xmath59 upgrade lattice @xcite used ip beta functions tunes @xmath60 @xmath61 tracking synchrotron oscillations machine errors optics corrections fig blue lines show on - momentum aperture 10 random error settings red lines relative momentum error @xmath62 ellipse @xmath63 beam size fringe effect increases on - momentum aperture reduces horizontal off - momentum aperture .510 tune - momentum improvement fringe compensation amplitude tune shift sextupoles off - momentum effect 1st octupole side band half - integer resonance fringe octupole resonance condition @xmath64 yields resonance tune @xmath65 moving tune 28.518 restored aperture above @xmath63 size new lie generator hard - edge fringe solenoid magnet fourth - order generator octupole - like kick charge particles additional x - y couplings off - centered orbit kozanecki study crossing - angle parasitic crossing effects pep - ii @xmath66 collider bassetti biscari 1996 conference proceedings 153 p166 papaphilippou talman67 046502 ( 2003 ) forest milutinovic methods phys a269 474 ( 1988 ) cai al slac pub7642 ( 1997 ) nosochkov pub9812 ( 2003 ) slac pub9810 ( 2003 ) | 0.352604 | 2,235 | 1,097 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,642 | the report describes the research program on the development of ultra - low - energy germanium detectors , with emphasis on wimp dark matter searches .
a threshold of 100 ev is achieved with a 20 g detector array , providing a unique probe to the low - mas wimp .
present data at a surface laboratory is expected to give rise to comparable sensitivities with the existing limits at the @xmath0 wimp - mass range .
the projected parameter space to be probed with a full - scale , kilogram mass - range experiment is presented .
such a detector would also allow the studies of neutrino - nucleus coherent scattering and neutrino magnetic moments . as - texono/07 - 05 + weakly interacting massive particles ( wimp , denoted by @xmath1 ) are the leading candidates for cold dark matter ( cdm ) @xcite , and supersymmetric ( susy ) particles are the favored wimp candidates .
the popular susy models prefer wimp mass ( @xmath2 ) of the range of @xmath3100 gev , though light neutralinos remain a possibility @xcite . simple extensions of the standard model with a singlet scalar favors light wimps @xcite .
most cdm experiments optimize their design in the high - mass region , and have diminishing sensitivities for @xmath4 , where there is an allowed region if the dama annual modulation data are interpreted as wimp signatures @xcite . to probe this low - mass region , detectors with sub - kev threshold are necessary .
these low - threshold detectors will also open the window to look for wimps bound in the solar system @xcite , as well as non - pointlike susy candidates like q - balls @xcite .
sensitivity to sub - kev energy presents a formidable challenge to detector technology and to background control .
so far , only the cresst - i experiment have derived exclusion limits @xcite with sapphire(@xmath5)-based cryogenic detector at a threshold of 600 ev .
a research program in low energy neutrino and astroparticle physics is pursued @xcite by the texono collaboration at the kuo - sheng(ks ) reactor laboratory .
a scientific goal is to develop advanced detectors with kg - size target mass , 100 ev - range threshold and low - background specifications for wimp searches as well as for the studies of neutrino - nucleus coherent scatterings @xcite and neutrino magnetic moments ( @xmath6 ) @xcite .
the ks laboratory is located 28 m from a 2.9 gw reactor core and has an overburden of about 30 meter - water - equivalence ( mwe ) .
its facilities are described in ref .
@xcite , where the @xmath6-studies with a 1.06 kg germanium detector ( hpge ) at a hardware threshold of 5 kev were reported .
this hpge has also been used for the studies of reactor electron neutrons @xcite as well as searches for reactor axions @xcite .
the experimental procedures were well - established and the background above 12 kev were measured .
in particular , a background level of about @xmath7(cpd ) comparable to those of other underground cdm experiments was achieved .
`` ultra - low - energy '' germanium ( ulege ) detectors , developed originally for soft x - rays detection , are candidate technologies to meet the challenges of probing into the unexplored sub - kev energy domain @xcite .
these detectors typically have modular mass of 5 - 10 grams
. detector array of up to n=30 elements have been successfully built , while there are recent advances in developing single - element ulege of kg - size mass @xcite .
various prototypes based on this detector technology have been constructed .
depicted in figure [ fe55 ] is the measured energy spectrum due to external @xmath8fe calibration sources ( 5.90 and 6.49 kev ) together with x - rays from ti ( 4.51 and 4.93 kev ) , ca ( 4.01 kev ) , s ( 2.46 kev ) and al ( 1.55 kev ) .
random trigger events uncorrelated to the detector provided the zero - energy pedestals .
pulse shape discrimination ( psd ) criteria were applied as illustrated in figure [ psd ] by correlating two output with different electronics amplifications and shaping times .
the electronic noise edge was suppressed by psd and a threshold of 100 ev was achieved .
the deviations of the low energy spectra of the selected events from a flat distribution gave the efficiencies of the psd cuts .
pulse shape discrimination : correlations of signals with different electronic amplifications and shaping times lead to suppression of the noise edge . ]
pulse shape discrimination : correlations of signals with different electronic amplifications and shaping times lead to suppression of the noise edge . ]
low - background data were taken at ks under the same shielding configurations as the magnetic moment experiments @xcite , using a 4-channel ulege detector each having an active mass of 5 g. the recorded spectrum with 0.34 kg - day of data after cosmic - rays and anti - compton vetos and psd selection is displayed in figure [ bkgspect ] .
it can be seen that comparable background level was achieved as the cresst - i @xcite experiment with 1.51 kg - day of data .
a summary of the spin - independent exclusion plot is depicted in figure [ dmplot ] .
comparable limits to cresst - i can be expected from the current ks results .
intensive efforts on the data analysis are underway . the projected sensitivities with 1 kg - year of data at 100 ev threshold and a 1 cpd background level are shown . expected spin - independent sensitivity region for cdm searches using a ulege detector with a mass of 1 kg at 1 cpd background level . also shown are the present exclusion boundaries @xcite and the dama allowed regions @xcite .
the striped region is the parameter space favored by the susy models @xcite . ]
expected spin - independent sensitivity region for cdm searches using a ulege detector with a mass of 1 kg at 1 cpd background level .
also shown are the present exclusion boundaries @xcite and the dama allowed regions @xcite .
the striped region is the parameter space favored by the susy models @xcite . ]
an r&d program towards the realizations of a full - scale experiment is rigorously pursued .
quenching factor measurement for nuclear recoils in ge with sub - kev ionization energy will be performed at a neutron beam facility .
background studies are conducted at both ks and the yang - yang underground laboratory ( 700 mwe ) in south korea with the various prototypes .
background understanding at the sub - kev range is a challenging and unexplored subject in its own right .
external background is expected to be reduced due to self - shielding effects in a kg - mass detector , as well as by additional active veto ge layers enclosing hermetically the ulege inner target @xcite .
studies are under way with a 180-g segmented ulege prototype equipped with a veto ring and dual - readout channels from both the signal and high - voltage electrodes . a 500-g detector similar to the design demonstrated in ref .
@xcite is being constructed . | 9 drees m and gerbier g 2006 _ j. phys . _ * g 33 * 233 , and references therein .
bottino a et al .
2005 _ phys .
* d 72 * 083521 he x g et al .
2007 _ mod .
lett . _ * a 22 * 2121 gondolo p and gelmini g 2005 _ phys . rev . _ * d 71 * 123520 damour t and l.m .
krauss 1998 _ phys .
lett . _ * 81 * 5726 ; collar j i 1999 _ phys .
* d 59 * 063514 gelmini g , kusenko a and nussinov s 2002 _ phys .
lett . _ * 89 * 101302 angloher g et al .
2002 _ astropart .
* 18 * 43 wong h t 2004 _ mod .
lett . _ * a 19 * 1207 wong h t et al . 2006 _ j. phys .
ser . _ * 39 * 266 wong h t and li h b 2005 _ mod . phys .
lett . _ * a 20 * 1103 li h b et al .
2003 _ phys .
lett . _ * 90 * 131802 ; wong h t et al .
2007 _ phys .
* d 75 * 012001 xin b et al . 2005 _ phys .
* d 72 * 012006 chang h m et al .
2007 _ phys .
* d 75 * 052004 barbeau p a , collar j i and tench o 2007 _ jcap _ * 09 * 009 these proceedings , for complete references and latest updates . | drees gerbier g 2006 phys 33 * 233 references bottino 2005 phys 72 * 083521 he x g 2007 lett 22 * 2121 gondolo p gelmini g 2005 phys 71 * 123520 damour t krauss 1998 phys. lett 81 * 5726 collar 1999 59 * 063514 gelmini kusenko nussinov s 2002 89 * 101302 angloher g 2002 astropart 18 * 43 wong h t 2004 lett 19 * 1207 wong h t 2006 39 * 266 wong h t li h b 2005 phys 20 * 1103 li h b 2003 90 * 131802 wong h t 2007 75 * 012001 xin b 2005 72 * 012006 chang h m 75 * 052004 barbeau p collar j tench o 2007 09 * 009 proceedings references updates | 0.07308 | 405 | 228 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,649 | vbfnlo is a flexible parton level monte carlo program for the simulation of vector boson fusion ( vbf ) , double and triple vector boson ( plus jet ) production in hadronic collisions at next - to - leading order ( nlo ) in the strong coupling constant , as well as higgs boson plus two jet production via gluon fusion at the one - loop level .
this note briefly describes the main additional features and processes that have been added in the new release vbfnlo version 2.6.0 . at nlo qcd diboson production ( @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 ) , same - sign @xmath5 pair production via vector boson fusion and the process
@xmath6 have been implemented ( for which one - loop tensor integrals up to six - point functions are included ) .
in addition , gluon induced diboson production can be studied separately at the leading order ( one - loop ) level .
the diboson processes @xmath7 , @xmath1 and @xmath0 can be run with anomalous gauge boson couplings , and anomalous couplings between a higgs and a pair of gauge bosons is included in @xmath7 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 diboson production .
the code has also been extended to include anomalous gauge boson couplings for single vector boson production via vbf , and a spin-2 model has been implemented for diboson pair production via vector boson fusion .
ka - tp-28 - 2012 , man / hep/2012/09 , mz - th/12 - 27 , + cern - ph - th/2012 - 194 , ippp/12/50 , dcpt/12/100 , + ftuv-12 - 0709 , lpn12 - 078 , ttk-12 - 32 * release note vbfnlo-2.6.0 * k. arnold@xmath8 , j. bellm@xmath8 , g. bozzi@xmath9 , f. campanario@xmath8 , c. englert@xmath10 , b. feigl@xmath8 , j. frank@xmath8 , t. figy@xmath11 , b. jger@xmath12 , m. kerner@xmath8 , m. kubocz@xmath13 , c. oleari@xmath14 , s. palmer@xmath8 , m. rauch@xmath8 , h. rzehak@xmath15 , f. schissler@xmath8 , o. schlimpert@xmath8 , m. spannowsky@xmath10 , d. zeppenfeld@xmath8 @xmath8 institut fr theoretische physik , universitt karlsruhe , karlsruhe institute of technology , 76128 karlsruhe , germany + @xmath9 dipartimento di fisica , universita di milano and infn , 20133 milano , italy + @xmath10 institute for particle physics phenomenology , university of durham , durham , dh1 3le , united kingdom + @xmath11 school of physics and astronomy , the university of manchester , manchester , m13 9pl , united kingdom + @xmath12 institut fr physik ( thep ) , johannes - gutenberg - universitt , 55099 mainz , germany + @xmath13 institut fr theoretische teilchenphysik und kosmologie , rwth aachen university , 52056 aachen , germany + @xmath14 dipartimento di fisica , universit di milano - bicocca and infn , sezione di milano - bicocca , 20126 milano , italy + @xmath15 cern , ch-1211 geneva 23 , switzerland ( on leave from : physikalisches institut albert - ludwigs - universitt freiburg , hermann - herder - str . 3 , 79104 freiburg i m breisgau , germany ) + | vbfnlo @xcite is a flexible monte carlo ( mc ) program for vector boson fusion ( vbf ) , double and triple vector boson ( plus jet ) production processes at nlo qcd accuracy .
the electroweak corrections to higgs boson production via vbf have been included .
in addition , the simulation of @xmath16-even and @xmath16-odd higgs boson production in gluon fusion , associated with two additional jets , is implemented at the ( one - loop ) lo qcd level .
vbfnlo can be run in the mssm , and anomalous couplings of the higgs boson and gauge bosons have been implemented for certain processes .
additionally , two higgsless extra dimension models are included the warped higgsless scenario and a three - site higgsless model for selected processes .
further information , and the latest version of the code , can be found on the vbfnlo webpage http://www-itp.particle.uni-karlsruhe.de/vbfnlo/ a complete process list is given in appendix a.
the latest version of vbfnlo has several new processes implemented at nlo qcd . same sign @xmath5 pair production with two jets via
vector boson fusion @xcite has been included in vbfnlo 2.6.0 .
this process is potentially sensitive to new physics signals and , as it gives rise to same sign dilepton final states , it is also a background to new physics scenarios . to distinguish potential signatures of physics beyond the standard model from the effect of higher order corrections , precise theoretical predictions are essential .
although the qcd corrections to the integrated cross sections were found to be relatively small , their effect on several distributions is appreciable . when nlo qcd corrections are taken into account , the residual scale uncertainties are at the 2.5% level .
the new process ids are given in table [ tab : vvjj ] . | vbfnlo @xcite flexible monte carlo program for vector boson fusion double triple vector boson production at nlo qcd accuracy electroweak corrections to higgs boson production vbf included simulation of @xmath16-even-odd higgs boson production in gluon fusion two additional jets at one - loop lo qcd level run in mssm anomalous couplings higgs boson gauge bosons implemented two higgsless extra dimension models three - site higgsless model information latest version code on vbfnlo webpage http://www-itp.particle.uni-karlsruhe.de/vbfnlo complete process list in appendix a latest version new processes at nlo qcd same sign @xmath5 pair production with two jets via vector boson fusion @xcite included in vbfnlo 2.6.0 sensitive to new physics signals new physics scenarios corrections precise theoretical predictions essential qcd corrections to integrated cross sections small effect on distributions appreciable residual scale uncertainties at 2.5% level new process ids in table | 0.073541 | 414 | 214 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,659 | we analyse a biased random walk on a 1d lattice with unequal step lengths .
such a walk was recently shown to undergo a phase transition from a state containing a single connected cluster of visited sites to one with several clusters of visited sites ( fragments ) separated by unvisited sites at a critical probability @xmath0 [ _ prl * 99 * , 180602 ( 2007 ) _ ] .
the behaviour of @xmath1 , the probability of formation of fragments of length @xmath2 is analysed .
an exact expression for the generating function of @xmath1 at the critical point is derived .
we prove that the asymptotic behaviour is of the form @xmath3 $ ] . | anteneodo and morgado recently discussed an interesting one - dimensional random walk model that exhibits a phase transition @xcite . in this model , at each time step the random walker moves two lattice spacings to the right or one spacing to the left with probabilities @xmath4 and @xmath5 respectively .
the sites visited by such a walk are , depending on @xmath4 , either part of a single connected cluster of visited sites or many clusters of visited sites ( fragments ) separated by single unvisited sites . a transition from one class to the other takes place at the critical probability @xmath6 . at large times
, for @xmath7 the cluster of visited sites contains no gaps , however , for @xmath8 this cluster contains a finite density of unvisited sites . using monte - carlo simulation data , a power law dependence with an exponent @xmath9
was estimated for @xmath10 , the fraction of fragments with length @xmath2 . since the model is a simple one dimensional random walk that is not known to contain any such anamolous exponents , such a behaviour seems unlikely .
we prove below that the correct asymptotic behaviour of @xmath10 at the critical point is @xmath11^{-1}$ ] which is infact hard to distinguish numerically from a power law dependence with exponent @xmath9 . at large times
, it is easy to see ( using the central limit theorem ) that the probability distribution of the position of the walker is a gaussian with mean @xmath12 and variance @xmath13 .
when the walker is biased towards the left ( @xmath14 ) , the probability of the walker being on the left of the origin tends to @xmath15 as @xmath16 . hence the visited sites are part of a single connected cluster . when the walker is biased towards the right , in general the clusters of visited sites
are separated by single unvisited sites .
the fraction of visited sites @xmath17 is defined as @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the average number of distinct sites visited in an @xmath20-step walk and @xmath21 is the average length of an @xmath20-step walk .
the fraction of unvisited sites @xmath22 , is given by @xmath23 .
for this case , @xmath22 can be calculated exactly using methods outlined in @xcite,@xcite . in the large @xmath20 limit , as @xmath24 , @xmath25 , where @xmath26 .
the total number of fragments in a walk is equal to the number of unvisited sites and hence @xmath27 , the average number of fragments is equal to @xmath28 . the single unvisited sites at the edge of each fragment ensure that the probability of formation of a fragment is independent of the previous history of the walker .
the walk can therefore be considered as a discrete process of independent increments where at each step a new fragment of length @xmath2 is added to the positive edge of the walk with probability @xmath1 .
these probabilities are multiplicative , i.e.- the probability of formation of a fragment of length @xmath29 followed by one of length @xmath30 is @xmath31 .
the number of fragments of length @xmath2 in a given walk is @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the total number of fragments .
therefore @xmath34 and hence @xmath35 since @xmath36 .
for a new fragment of length @xmath2 to be formed the walker must ( i ) be at the positive edge of the walk ( at site @xmath37 for convenience ) , ( ii ) hop over site @xmath38 and reach site @xmath2 by visiting each site between @xmath15 and @xmath2 , without visiting sites @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
thus at the end of each step the walker is once again at the positive edge of the walk .
@xmath1 is therefore the probability of event ( ii ) occuring .
hence @xmath1 is the sum of probabilities of all paths that are consistent with ( ii ) .
we calculate @xmath40 , the probability of condition ( ii ) with the constraint of ` visiting every site between @xmath15 and @xmath2 ' relaxed .
hence @xmath40 is the probability of starting at site @xmath37 and reaching site @xmath2 without visiting @xmath38 and @xmath39 . @xmath40
thus includes the probability of formation of smaller fragments within the segment @xmath41 $ ] . for example @xmath42 . in general @xmath43
this translates to the following equation involving generating functions @xmath44 where @xmath45 and @xmath46 .
+ we calculate @xmath40 by summing over probabilities of all paths that are consistent with the above definition of @xmath40 . for example
, @xmath47 simply involves the walker reaching site @xmath15 from @xmath37 by hopping over site @xmath38 .
thus @xmath48 .
it is also easy to see that @xmath49 is @xmath38 since unvisited sites in this walk can not be separated by two lattice sites . in the calculation of @xmath50
we sum over paths in which the walker starting from @xmath37 , jumps over site @xmath38 to reach @xmath15 and then over @xmath51 to reach site @xmath52 with probability @xmath53 .
once at site @xmath52 , the walker can move two leftward steps followed by a rightward step with probability @xmath54 , any number of times , to return to site @xmath52 .
thus @xmath55 . generalizing this procedure of summing over
all relevant walks , we derive below a closed form expression of @xmath40 in two equivalent ways . the walk can be considered as a markov process where at each time step the walker moves either two lattice spacings to the right or one to the left with probabilities @xmath4 and @xmath5 respectively , independent of the previous step .
the probability @xmath40 can be calculated from @xmath56 , the matrix of transition probabilities @xcite with no transitions from the sites @xmath38 , @xmath39 and @xmath57 . for example
@xmath58\ ] ] where the rows correspond to sites [ 0 1 2 3 4 5 ] .
consider the column vector @xmath59 where @xmath60 , the element in row @xmath61 , is the probability of the walker starting at site @xmath15 , being at site @xmath61 at time step @xmath62 .
now @xmath59 evolves as @xmath63 which ensures that @xmath59 only contains probabilities of paths that never visit sites @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
since the walker starts at site @xmath15 , @xmath64 .
we calculate @xmath65 where @xmath66 is the probability of the walker , starting from site @xmath15 being at site @xmath61 , at any time step .
@xmath65 is thus the sum of @xmath59 at every time step .
hence @xmath67 all walks that start at @xmath15 and end at @xmath2 ( at any time step ) contribute to @xmath40 , therefore @xmath68 where @xmath69 and @xmath70 .
thus @xmath40 is the ( @xmath71 ) matrix element of @xmath72 .
the factor @xmath4 is present because the walker must hop over site @xmath38 to reach @xmath15 as in condition ( ii ) .
we thus obtain @xmath73 , @xmath74 , @xmath75 , @xmath76 and so on . subtituting these into eq.([generating ] )
we obtain @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 , @xmath80 and so on .
alternatively , consider @xmath81 , the probability of a walker starting at site -1 , being at site @xmath61 while never visiting @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
now @xmath81 satisfies the difference equation @xmath82 with the boundary conditions @xmath83 and @xmath84 .
a general solution of @xmath81 is @xmath85 which on substitution into eq.([gs ] ) yields the cubic equation @xmath86 .
the solutions to this equation are @xmath87 where @xmath88 . by satisfying boundary conditions we obtain @xmath89 \label{gs - solution}\ ] ] where a is a constant which is determined from the normalization condition @xmath90 . alternatively from the definition of @xmath40 as the connecting probability between @xmath37 and @xmath2 we have @xmath91 we thus have a closed form expression for @xmath40 .
we verify that the two expressions for @xmath40 are equal as the matrix elements of the column corresponding to site 1 in @xmath92 satisfy the same difference equation and , with an appropriate change of variables , the same boundary conditions as g(s ) .
having found the generating function , we can extract the behaviour of @xmath1 for large @xmath2 . from eq.([criticalrho ] ) , @xmath102 where @xmath103 .
we can approximate the summation in the generating function by an integral @xmath104\rho(l)dl$ ] .
the singular part of this integral can be evaluated by equating @xmath105 from which we see that @xmath106 .
alternatively , from the fact that the integral @xmath107/(\log \
l)^2dl$ ] diverges as @xmath108^{-1}(1+o[\frac{1}{\log \epsilon}])$ ] we obtain @xmath109 we thus have an expression for the asymptotic behaviour of @xmath1 .
cases in which the rightward steps are of length @xmath110 can be treated in a similar way . in this case
the independent elements are clusters of visited and unvisited sites separated by @xmath111 zeroes .
i thank prof .
deepak dhar for providing the central ideas that led to these results and r. loganayagam for helpful discussions on the series expansions involved .
+ 9 c. anteneodo and w.a.m .
morgado , phys .
lett . * 99 * , 180602 ( 2007 ) w. feller , _ introduction to probability theory and its applications _ e. w. montroll and g. h. weiss , j. math
* 6 * , 167 ( 1965 ) | anteneodo morgado discussed one - dimensional random walk model phase transition @xcite each walker moves two lattice spacings right or one left with probabilities @xmath4 and @xmath5 sites visited depending @xmath4 single connected cluster or separated by unvisited sites transition from one class to other at critical probability @xmath6 large times for @xmath7 cluster no gaps @xmath8 finite density unvisited sites monte - carlo simulation power law dependence with exponent @xmath9 estimated for @xmath10 fragments length @xmath2 model one dimensional random walk anamolous exponents behaviour unlikely correct asymptotic behaviour of @xmath10 at critical point is @xmath11^{-1}$ hard to distinguish from power law dependence with exponent @xmath9 probability distribution of position walker is gaussian with mean @xmath12 variance @xmath13 walker biased towards left @xmath14 probability tends to @xmath15 @xmath16 visited sites part of single connected cluster walker biased right clusters separated by single unvisited sitesfraction of visited sites @xmath17 defined as @xmath18 @xmath19 average number sites walk @xmath21 average length fraction unvisited sites @xmath22 given by @xmath23 calculated using methods @xcite large @xmath20 limit total number fragments walk equal to unvisited sites @xmath27 average number fragments equal to @xmath28 single unvisited sites at edge each fragment probability formation fragment independent of previous history walker walk discrete process independent increments each new fragment @xmath2 added to positive edge with probability @xmath1 probabilities multiplicative probability formation of fragment @xmath29 is @xmath31 number of fragments length @xmath2 in walk is @xmath32 @xmath33 total number fragments @xmath34 @xmath35 since @xmath36 for new fragment @xmath2 walker must be at positive edge hop over site @xmath38 reach site @xmath2 visiting each site between @xmath15 @xmath2 without visiting @xmath38 and @xmath39 end each step walker at positive edge @xmath1 probability of event ( ii ) occuring@xmath1 sum paths consistent with ( ii ) calculate @xmath40 probability condition ii ) constraint visiting site between @xmath15 @xmath2 @xmath40 starting @xmath37 reaching @xmath2 without visiting includes smaller fragments within segment @xmath41 @xmath43 translates equation generating functions @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 calculate @xmath40 summing probabilities paths consistent with definition @xmath40 @xmath47 walker reaching site @xmath15 from @xmath37 hopping over @xmath38 @xmath48 @xmath49 is @xmath38 unvisited sites separated by lattice sites @xmath50 sum paths walker starting from @xmath37 jumps over @xmath38 to reach @xmath15 @xmath51 reach @xmath52 with probability @xmath53 at site @xmath52 walker move two leftward steps rightward step probability @xmath54 return to site @xmath52 @xmath55 closed form expression of @xmath40 two ways walk markov process walker moves two lattice spacings right or one left with probabilities @xmath4 and @xmath5 independent previous stepprobability @xmath40 calculated from @xmath56 matrix transition probabilities no transitions from sites example @xmath58 rows correspond to sites 0 1 2 3 4 5 column vector @xmath59 @xmath60 row probability walker starting at site @xmath15 @xmath61 step @xmath59 evolves as @xmath63 probabilities paths sites @xmath38 walker starts at site @xmath15 calculate @xmath65 @xmath66 probability walker starting from at site @xmath61 any step @xmath65 sum of @xmath59 at every step @xmath67 walks start at @xmath15 end at @xmath2 contribute to @xmath40 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath40 is @xmath71 matrix element of @xmath72 factor @xmath4 present walker must hop over site @xmath38 to reach @xmath15 obtain @xmath73 subtituting into eq.([generating obtain @xmath77 consider @xmath81 probability walker starting at site -1 site @xmath61 never visiting @xmath38@xmath81 satisfies difference equation @xmath82 boundary conditions @xmath83 @xmath84 general solution @xmath81 is @xmath85 into eq. yields cubic equation @xmath86 solutions are @xmath87 @xmath88 satisfying boundary conditions obtain @xmath89 solution a constant determined from normalization condition @xmath90 definition @xmath40 connecting probability between @xmath37 @xmath2 have @xmath91 closed form expression for @xmath40 two expressions @xmath40 equal matrix elements column site 1 @xmath92 satisfy same difference equation same boundary conditions as g(s found generating function extract behaviour of @xmath1 for @xmath2 eq. @xmath102 @xmath103 approximate summation by integral @xmath104\rho(l)dl$ equating @xmath105 @xmath106 integral @xmath107 diverges @xmath108 obtain @xmath109 expression for asymptotic behaviour of @xmath1 rightward steps length @xmath110 treated independent elements are clusters of visited unvisited sites separated by @xmath111 zeroesdeepak dhar central ideas results r. loganayagam discussions series expansions 9 anteneodo w morgado. lett 99 180602 2007 ) feller introduction probability theory applications w. montroll g. h. weiss math 6 167 1965 ) | 0.34887 | 2,297 | 1,221 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,663 | we introduce a transport approach at fixed shear viscosity to entropy ratio @xmath0 to study the generation of collective flows in ultra - relativistic heavy - ion collisions .
transport theory supplies a covariant approach valid also at large @xmath0 and at intermediate transverse momentum @xmath1 , where deviations from equilibrium is no longer negligible .
such an approach shows that at rhic energies a temperature dependent @xmath0 enhances significantly the @xmath2 respect to the case of constant @xmath0 .
furthermore if njl chiral dynamics is self - consistently implemented we show that it does not modify the relation between @xmath3 and @xmath0 . | the rhic program at bnl has shown that the azimuthal asymmetry in momentum space , namely the elliptic flow @xmath3 , is the largest ever seen in hic suggesting that an almost perfect fluid with a very small shear viscosity to entropy density ratio , @xmath0 , has been created @xcite .
nonetheless it has been found that dissipative effects can not be neglected and even a small shear viscosity to entropy ratio @xmath0 produce sizeable effect increasing with the transverse momentum @xmath1 of the particles @xcite .
this has triggered a lot of activity in developing a relativistic theory of viscous hydrodynamics .
viscous corrections to ideal hydrodynamics are indeed large and a simple relativistic extension of first order navier stokes equations is affected by causality and stability pathologies @xcite .
it is therefore necessary to go to second order gradient expansion , and in particular the israel - stewart theory has been implemented to simulate the rhic collisions providing an upper bound for @xmath4 @xcite . such an approach , apart from the limitation to 2 + 1d simulations , has the more fundamental problem of a limited range of validity in @xmath0 and in the transverse momentum @xmath1
. on the contrary a relativistic transport approach has the advantage to be a 3 + 1d approach not based on a gradient expansion in viscosity that is valid also for large @xmath0 and for out of equilibrium momentum distribution allowing a reliable description also of the intermediate @xmath1 range where the important property of quark number scaling ( qns ) of @xmath5 has been observed @xcite . in this @xmath1 region
viscous hydrodynamics breaks its validity because the relative deviation of the equilibrium distribution function @xmath6 increases with @xmath7 becoming large already at @xmath8 @xcite .
furthermore boltzmann - vlasov transport theory distinguishes between the short range interaction associated to collisions and long range interaction associated to the field interaction , responsible for the change of the equation of state ( eos ) respect to that of a free gas .
this last feature allows to unify two main ingredients that are relevant for the formation of collective flow . in ideal hydrodynamics
the @xmath9 depends strongly on the eos namely on the sound velocity @xmath10 @xcite , while the mean free path @xmath11 is assumed to be vanishing . in the parton cascade approach the eos
is fixed to be the one of a free gas @xmath12 , on the other hand the mean free path @xmath13 is finite . in the first stage of rhic
the two different approaches were able to account for the large @xmath9 observed ; in particular the parton cascade with large scattering cross section predicted the saturation of @xmath9 vs @xmath1 @xcite .
anyway once viscosity is finite both a finite @xmath11 and the eos are important for the generation of the momentum anisotropies .
the basic equation of transport for the ( anti- ) quark phase - space distribution function @xmath14 under a scalar field interaction can be written as : @xmath15 where the first term is related to the free streaming , the second term represents the effect of a scalar field modifying the @xmath16 relation ( giving a finite interaction measure , see fig.2 ( left ) ) and the last term is the effect of the collisions directly associated to a finite @xmath11 and therefore to a finite @xmath0 . in the following
we will show two results obtained with such an approach : one related with the large @xmath2 ratio observed at rhic and the other discussing the role of the njl chiral dynamics on the relation between @xmath9 and @xmath0 .
we will show calculations for @xmath17 at 200 agev ; the density distribution in coordinate space is given by the standard glauber model .
the maximum initial temperature is @xmath18 mev and the initial time is @xmath19 fm / c as usually done also in hydrodynamical calculations .
we first consider the reduction of the transport approach to a cascade , i.e. neglect the field interaction , included in the next section .
in such a case the mass @xmath20 in eq.(1 ) . it has been shown that a fluid at finite @xmath0 can be studied within a transport approach renormalizing locally the scattering cross section according to @xmath21 , for details see ref.s @xcite .
the system of course expands and cools and when the energy density is below @xmath22 it starts the cross - over region and then the hadronic stage . during this phase we increase the @xmath23 of the medium according to fig . 1 ( left ) in order to have finally in the hadronic phase an @xmath24 in agreement with several calculation of @xmath0 . at rhic
it has been observed @xmath25 ratio of about 0.8 - 0.9 quite larger than first ideal hydrodynamical predictions of about 0.5 .
more realistic hydrodynamical calculations show that the ratio can be even lower than 0.5 and viscosity does not strongly affect such a ratio but can bring it up to about 0.6 . furthermore in ref.@xcite
it has been shown that such a ratio is almost independent on the initial eccentricity , on the viscosity , on the particle species .
therefore even if @xmath26 and @xmath3 can depend on several details such a ratio is a quite stable one and its large value should be considered as an oppurtunity to have some new information on the system not yet spot . on the energy density @xmath27 implemented in the transport code .
right : @xmath2 for @xmath17 collisions in the mid - rapidity region @xmath28 at b= 8 fm ; dashed line is the result for a constant @xmath29 , the solid line is the result for a temperature dependence of the @xmath0 like shown by solid line on the left figure.,title="fig:",width=240,height=172 ] on the energy density @xmath27 implemented in the transport code .
right : @xmath2 for @xmath17 collisions in the mid - rapidity region @xmath28 at b= 8 fm ; dashed line is the result for a constant @xmath29 , the solid line is the result for a temperature dependence of the @xmath0 like shown by solid line on the left figure.,title="fig:",width=240,height=192 ] in ref.@xcite we have shown that indeed the formation time of @xmath26 is larger than the @xmath3 one and therefore it is more affected by dynamics of the later stage of the reaction . thanks to the difference in the formation time we argue that such a ratio is significantly affected by the temperature dependence of the @xmath0 .
therefore we have performed two calculations one with a constant @xmath29 in the qgp phase ( dashed line ) and the other , shown by solid line in fig . 1 ( left ) , with a t or @xmath27 energy density dependence @xmath30 where @xmath31 gives the beginning of the cross over region .
we remind that an increase of @xmath0 is expected moving away from the phase transition region on general considerations @xcite . in fig.1 ( left )
we show the results of the two calculations for @xmath17 at 200 agev . for a constant @xmath0
we find a value of about 0.6 while in the case of a temperature dependent @xmath0 , it increases getting very close to experimental data , @xmath32 0.8 .
the reason for the sensitivity of this ratio on the t dependence is that the elliptic flow @xmath3 mainly develops earlier respect to @xmath26 and therefore on the average at larger @xmath0 ( for the solid line case ) , while @xmath26 develops more when the @xmath0 is smaller hence is less suppressed by dissipative effects .
to start the investigation of the role of the field interaction we have implemented the njl dynamics that introduces the generation of a finite mass associated to chiral symmetry breaking .
therefore particles do not have a vanishing mass but a finite one according to the mass gap equation of the njl model : @xmath33 that determines the local mass @xmath34 at the space - time point @xmath35 in terms of the distribution functions @xmath36 . for a gas at finite mass @xmath37
is no longer vanishing as shown in fig.2 ( right ) for several njl parametrization .
eqs.([vlasovnjl ] ) and ( [ noneqmass2 ] ) form a closed system of equations constituting the boltzmann - vlasov equation associated to the njl lagrangian .
the space - time dependence of the mass @xmath38 influences the momenta of the particles because the finite gradient of the condensate generates a force which changes the momentum of a particle proportionally to @xmath39 .
the last is negative because the phase transition occurs earlier in the surface of the expanding qgp fireball .
therefore the phase transition which take place locally results in a negative contribution to the particle momenta that makes the system more sticky respect to a free massless gas . to study a fluid at finite @xmath0 and njl field interaction one has to extend the simple relation @xmath40 valid for a massless gas to the general case of massive relativistic particles and
this has been discussed in ref.@xcite . in fig.[v2-pt ] , we show the elliptic flow as a function of @xmath1 .
we find that the presence of an njl - field that drives the chiral phase transition suppress the @xmath5 by about @xmath41 at @xmath42 gev .
this would imply the need of a parton scattering cross section @xmath43 even larger than that estimated with the cascade model which was already quite larger than the pqcd estimates @xcite in order to describe the data .
on the other hand the mean field modifies both the local entropy density , reduced by the mass generation , and the shear viscosity that increases respect to the massless case . considering that one of the main goal is to determine the @xmath23 of the qgp , we have investigated what is the action of the mean field once the @xmath23 of the system is fixed to be the same with and without the njl field .
this of course implies different values of the cross section in the two cases .
collisions in the mid - rapidity region @xmath28 at b= 7 fm ; see text.,title="fig:",width=192,height=172 ] collisions in the mid - rapidity region @xmath28 at b= 7 fm ; see text.,title="fig:",width=249,height=172 ] the results for @xmath44 are shown by dashed lines in fig .
[ v2-pt ] ( right ) , the ( black ) dashed line is the case with only the collision term ( cascade ) while the ( green ) dashed line is the case with the field .
we can see that once the @xmath23 is fixed there is essentially no difference in the calculations with and without a field dynamics included .
this is a key result that shows that even in a microscopic approach that distinguishes between the mean field and the collisional dynamics the @xmath5 is mainly driven by the @xmath23 of the fluid . in other words we have found that in a microscopic approach the @xmath23 is the pertinent parameter and the language of viscous hydrodynamics is appropriate .
of course this does not mean that @xmath5 in the transport theory is the same as in viscous hydrodynamics ( especially at @xmath45 gev ) , but that the direct relation between @xmath5 and @xmath23 is not modified by the njl field dynamics .
this confirms the validity of the studies pursued till now even if they miss an explicit mean field dynamics and/or the chiral phase transition .
this work for v. baran is supported in part by the romanian ministry for education and research under the cncsis contract pnii id-946/2007 . | rhic program at bnl shown azimuthal asymmetry in momentum space elliptic flow @xmath3 largest seen in hic almost perfect fluid small viscosity to entropy density ratio @xmath0 created dissipative effects small viscosity to entropy ratio @xmath0 effect with transverse momentum triggered activity relativistic theory of viscous hydrodynamics viscous corrections to ideal hydrodynamics large relativistic extension of equations affected by causality stability pathologies necessary second order gradient expansion israel - stewart theory implemented rhic collisions upper bound for @xmath4 @xcite approach limited validity in @xmath0 transverse momentum @xmath1 relativistic transport approach 3 + 1d approach gradient expansion valid for large @xmath0 out of equilibrium momentum distribution reliable description intermediate @xmath1 range quark number scaling @xmath5 observed @xmath1 region viscous hydrodynamics breaks validity relative deviation of equilibrium distribution function @xmath6 increases with @xmath7 large at @xmath8boltzmann - vlasov transport theory distinguishes short range collisions long range interaction field interaction for change equation of state eos free gas two ingredients for collective flow ideal hydrodynamics @xmath9 depends on eos sound velocity mean free path @xmath11 vanishing parton cascade approach eos free gas @xmath12 mean free path @xmath13 finite first stage rhic two approaches for large @xmath9 parton cascade scattering predicted saturation of @xmath9 vs @xmath1 @xcite once viscosity finite @xmath11 and eos important for generation momentum anisotropies basic equation of transport for anti- quark phase - space distribution function @xmath14 under scalar field interaction written as @xmath15 first term related to free streaming second term effect scalar field modifying @xmath16 relation last term effect collisions finite @xmath11 @xmath0 two results one large @xmath2 ratio at rhic role njl chiral dynamics on relation between @xmath9 and @xmath0 calculations for @xmath17 at 200 agev density distribution in coordinate space given by standard glauber modelmaximum initial temperature @xmath18 mev initial time @xmath19 fm / c hydrodynamical calculations consider reduction transport approach to cascade neglect field interaction next section mass @xmath20 in eq.(1 ) fluid at finite @xmath0 studied within transport approach renormalizing scattering cross section @xmath21 see ref.s @xcite system expands cools energy density below @xmath22 starts cross - over region hadronic stage increase @xmath23 medium fig . 1 left ) hadronic phase @xmath24 agreement with calculation @xmath0 rhic observed @xmath25 ratio 0.8 - 0.9 larger than hydrodynamical predictions 0.5 realistic calculations ratio lower than 0.5 viscosity affect ratio up to 0.6 ratio independent on initial eccentricity viscosity particle species @xmath26 @xmath3 depend ratio stable large value new information on system energy density @xmath27 in transport code @xmath2 for @xmath17 collisions in mid - rapidity region @xmath28 at b= 8 fm dashed line result for constant @xmath29 solid line temperature dependence of @xmath0 left figure,title="fig:",width=240,height=172 energy density @xmath27 transport code right @xmath2 @xmath17 collisions mid - rapidity region @xmath28 at b= 8 fm dashed line result constant @xmath29 solid line temperature dependence @xmath0 solid line left figure,title="fig=240,height=192 ref.@xcite formation time @xmath26 larger than @xmath3 affected by dynamics later stage reaction difference formation time ratio affected temperature dependence @xmath0 performed two calculations constant @xmath29 qgp phase other fig . 1 left t @xmath27 energy density dependence @xmath30 @xmath31 beginning cross over region increase @xmath0 expected phase transition region general considerations @xcite fig.1 left ) results two calculations @xmath17 at 200 agev constant @xmath0 value about 0.6 temperature dependent @xmath0 increases experimental data @xmath32 0.8 sensitivity ratio t dependence elliptic flow @xmath3 develops earlier @xmath26 average larger @xmath0 @xmath26 develops more when @xmath0 smaller less suppressed by dissipative effects investigation field interaction implemented njl dynamics generation finite mass chiral symmetry breaking particles vanishing mass finite mass gap equation njl model @xmath33 determines local mass @xmath34 at space - time point @xmath35 distribution functions @xmath36 gas at finite mass @xmath37 no vanishing fig.2 njl parametrization eqs.([vlasovnjl noneqmass2 ] form closed system equations boltzmann - vlasov equation njl lagrangian space - time dependence mass @xmath38 influences momenta particles finite gradient condensate generates force changes momentum particle proportionally to @xmath39 negative phase transition earlier in surface expanding qgp fireball phase transition negative contribution particle momenta system sticky massless gas study fluid at finite @xmath0 njl field interaction extend relation @xmath40 massless gas to case massive relativistic particles discussed ref.@xcite fig.[v2-pt elliptic flow function of @xmath1 njl - field chiral phase transition @xmath5 by @xmath41 at @xmath42 gev parton scattering cross section @xmath43 larger than estimated cascade model mean field modifies local entropy density shear viscosity increases massless casemain goal determine @xmath23 of qgp investigated action mean field once @xmath23 fixed same with and without njl field implies different values cross section cases collisions mid - rapidity region @xmath28 at b= 7 fm results for @xmath44 shown by dashed lines in . black ) dashed line case with collision term green ) line with field once @xmath23 fixed no difference in calculations with and without field dynamics result shows microscopic approach field collisional dynamics @xmath5 driven by @xmath23 fluid microscopic approach @xmath23 is pertinent parameter language of viscous hydrodynamics appropriate not @xmath5 in transport theory same as in viscous hydrodynamics especially at @xmath45 gev direct relation between @xmath5 and @xmath23 not modified by njl field dynamics confirms validity of studies pursued even explicit mean field dynamics chiral phase transition work for v. baran supported by romanian ministry for education and research under cncsis contract pnii id-946/2007 | 0.360738 | 2,613 | 1,387 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,679 | we apply analytic perturbation theory to the qcd analysis of the @xmath0 structure function considering a combined set of deep inelastic scattering data presented by several collaborations , and extract values of the scale parameter @xmath1 , the parameters of the form of the @xmath2 structure function , and the @xmath3-shape of the higher twist contribution .
we study the difference between the results obtained within the standard perturbative and analytic approaches in comparison with the experimental errors and state that the greatest difference occurs for large @xmath3 .
+ _ keywords : _ quantum chromodynamics ; deep inelastic scattering ; structure functions , running coupling ; higher twists . + pacs nos . : 12.38.-t , 12.38.cy , 12.39.bx , 11.55.hx , 11.55.fv * the qcd analysis of the combined set for the @xmath4 structure function data based on the analytic approach * + | high - precision measurements of the deep inelastic scattering data open a possibility for testing new theoretical ideas in a wide kinematic range of @xmath3 and @xmath5 . in the present paper , we report the results of the application of the analytic approach in qcd @xcite , called the analytic perturbation theory ( apt ) , to the qcd analysis of the experimental data on the @xmath2 structure function .
in contrast to the perturbative running coupling which is spoiled by unphysical singularities in the infrared region at a scale @xmath6 , in the framework of the apt , the analytic coupling has no unphysical singularities .
this fact stimulated applications of the apt and its modifications supporting correct analytic properties for various physical processes ( see refs .
@xcite ) , especially after the generalization of the apt method to the noninteger powers of the running coupling @xcite .
this paper is a continuation of our previous analysis @xcite of the @xmath2 structure function data of the ccfr collaboration @xcite . in the present analysis
, we include in the consideration a set of various experimental @xmath2 data : the cdhs @xcite , scat @xcite , bebc - gargamelle @xcite , bebc - wa59 @xcite , nutev @xcite and chorus @xcite .
note that similar perturbative analysis was performed earlier in ref .
@xcite , but later the new data of the nutev and chorus collaborations were published , and we include these data in the present analysis . in accordance with the result of ref .
@xcite concerning the disagreement of cdhs data with perturbative qcd at small @xmath3 , a cut @xmath7 was applied to their data .
the total number of experimental points is 289 and considerably exceeds the number of points considered before in ref .
it allows us to determine parameters of the form of the @xmath2 structure function more precisely .
the kinematic region of a combined set of data is @xmath8 and @xmath9 gev@xmath10 .
thus , in addition to the previous analysis in ref . @xcite the kinematic region @xmath11 gev@xmath10 is now included .
this region provides a possibility for more precise determination of the parameter @xmath1 and the higher twist ( ht ) contribution . in order to achieve a more direct comparison of the perturbation theory ( pt ) and apt results for fit of a combine set of data
, we do not introduce the normalization factors for the data of an individual collaboration . in sec . 2
, we present the relevant theoretical expressions required for our analysis . in sec . 3 , we give the qcd fit results in the pt and apt approaches and compare the deviation of the apt results from the pt ones with the experimental uncertainties .
summarizing remarks are given in sec .
in this section , necessary expressions for our analysis are written and outline how we use them .
we follow the well known approach based on the jacobi polynomial expansion of structure functions .
this method of solution of the dokshitzer - gribov - lipatov - altarelli - parisi ( dglap ) evolution equation @xcite was proposed in refs .
@xcite and developed for both unpolarized @xcite and polarized cases @xcite .
the main formula of this method allows an approximate reconstruction of the structure function through a finite number of mellin moments @xmath12 here @xmath13 is the ht term , @xmath14 are the jacobi polynomials , @xmath15 contain @xmath16- and @xmath17-dependent euler @xmath18-functions where @xmath19 are the jacobi polynomial parameters , fixed by the minimization of the error in the reconstruction of the structure function .
the perturbative renormalization group @xmath5 evolution of moments is well known ( see , e.g. , refs .
@xcite ) and in the leading order reads as @xmath20^{\nu } } { ~[\alpha _ { s}(q_{0}^{2})]^{\nu}}\ , m_3(n , q^2_0 ) , ~~ { \nu(n)}={{{\gamma_{ns}^{(0),n}}/{2\beta_0 } } } , ~n = 2,~3 , ... \,,\ ] ] where @xmath21 is the qcd running coupling , @xmath22 are the nonsinglet one - loop anomalous dimensions , @xmath23 is the first coefficient of the renormalization group @xmath17-function , and @xmath24 denotes the number of active flavors .
unknown quantity @xmath25 in eq .
( [ evol - pt ] ) could be parameterized as the mellin moments of structure function @xmath2 at some point , @xmath26 : @xmath27 the shape of the function @xmath28 in eq .
( [ jacobi ] ) as well as the parameters @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 in eq .
( [ mellin ] ) , and the scale parameter @xmath1 are found by fit of a combined set of @xmath2-data @xcite .
the detailed description of the fitting procedure could be found in ref .
the target mass corrections are taken into account to the order @xmath33 .
we do not take into account the nuclear effect in the @xmath2 ( see estimations of this effect in refs .
@xcite ) . in our analysis
we use the analytic approach in qcd , the apt @xcite .
this approach gives the possibility of combining the renormalization group resummation with correct analytic properties in @xmath5-variable for physical quantities .
it should be noted that the moments of the structure functions should be analytic functions in the complex @xmath5 plane with a cut along the negative real axis ( see ref .
@xcite for more details ) , the ordinary pt description violates analytic properties . in the framework of the apt ,
the analytic coupling has no unphysical singularities and in the low-@xmath5 domain , instead of rapidly changing @xmath5 evolution , as occurs in the pt case , the apt approach leads to rather slowly changing functions ( see , e.g. , refs .
@xcite ) . in the asymptotic region of large @xmath5
the apt and pt results coincide .
the results of the leading order qcd fit of a combined set of @xmath2-data in the pt and apt approaches are presented in table 1 and figs .
[ graph1 ] [ graph6 ] . in both cases
the pt and apt are considered within the kinematic conditions @xmath53 gev@xmath10 , @xmath54 gev@xmath10 , for number of active flavours @xmath55 and @xmath56 . the values of @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath28 and @xmath47 are considered as free parameters .
[ tab:1 ] [ cols="<,^,^ " , ] as seen from table 1 , the analysis of a combined set of the @xmath2-data allows us to determine with good accuracy values of the parameter @xmath1 .
these values are different for the pt and apt cases , although consistent within errors .
errors in table 1 correspond to @xmath57 .
it should be noted that due to the increased volume of experimental data , in the present analysis the errors for @xmath58 and @xmath59 are some times less than in our previous analysis of ccfr data@xcite in which it was obtained @xmath60 mev and @xmath61 mev .
also , one can see from table 1 that the highest twist contribution is defined much more precisely than in our previous analysis @xcite ( for comparison see fig . 4 in ref .
@xcite and fig .
[ graph6 ] below ) .
let us turn now to fig .
[ graph1 ] , in which the extracted @xmath47-values is shown as a point with the corresponding experimental errors .
one could see this point is in the region of small powers of @xmath62 , @xmath63 , which corresponds effectively to small numbers of the mellin moments and , consequently , to small values of @xmath3 .
figure 2 shows the @xmath2-shape obtained in the apt ( solid line ) and the pt ( dotted line ) cases .
one can see that the result for the apt approach is slightly higher than for the pt one for small @xmath3 , and less for large @xmath3 .
further , we will consider the difference between the pt and apt fit results in comparison with the experimental errors and will try to answer the question : in what kinematic areas the deviation goes beyond the experimental uncertainties of the apt - fit result ?
+ [ graph2 ] [ graph3 ] in fig .
[ graph3 ] , we plot the difference in the @xmath3-shape of the @xmath2 structure function @xmath64 in comparison with the experimental uncertainties for @xmath65 at @xmath66 gev@xmath10 .
gray color shows a corridor of experimental errors for @xmath65 . as can be seen from fig .
[ graph3 ] , the difference @xmath67 is beyond the experimental errors as at small @xmath68 as well at large values of a variable @xmath3 , @xmath69 . at large @xmath3 values the deviation of the results of the pt from the apt exceeds several times the width of a corridor of experimental errors .
+ figure [ graph4 ] shows the difference between the moments in the pt and apt determined by using eqs .
( [ evol - pt ] ) and ( [ evol - apt ] ) , respectively , @xmath70 as a function of the number of the mellin moments ( including non integral value of @xmath71 ) in a wide range of @xmath72 at values @xmath73 ( left panel ) and @xmath74 ( right panel ) . comparing the results shown on the left and
right panels in fig .
[ graph4 ] one can see that in case of small @xmath5-values the difference @xmath75 goes beyond experimental errors at @xmath76 and exceeds several times the width of this corridor of the experimental errors at @xmath77 . for @xmath78
this effect is less pronounced .
let us consider the difference between the pt and apt approaches for the evolution factor , @xmath79 , which is given by @xmath80^{\nu}$ ] for the pt and @xmath81 for the apt , see eqs .
( [ evol - pt ] ) and ( [ evol - apt ] ) , respectively . in this case
we consider the quantity @xmath82 as a function of noninteger @xmath36 at @xmath53 gev@xmath10 .
we present @xmath83 in fig .
[ graph5 ] for values @xmath73 ( left panel ) and @xmath74 ( right panel ) .
the shaded area shows the experimental uncertainties of @xmath84 .
this uncertainty is related with errors of the only parameter @xmath52 ( see table 1 ) . + in general , the consideration of figs .
[ graph2 ] [ graph5 ] shows that the greatest difference between the results of the pt and apt approaches should be expected at low @xmath5 and large numbers of mellin moments @xmath71 , which corresponds to large values of the variable @xmath3 . finally , in fig .
[ graph6 ] the results of the @xmath3 dependence for the higher twists contribution in the pt and apt approaches are presented .
they are in qualitative agreement with each other .
our results are in qualitative agreement with the results of other papers on extraction of a contribution of the highest twists in the structure function @xmath2 @xcite .
accuracy of definition of the function @xmath28 considerably ( a few times ) increased , in comparison with our result @xcite of the analysis of ccfr data . in our previous analysis we noticed that @xmath85 for @xmath86 @xcite . here
we confirm this relation with higher accuracy .
it should be noted that this inequality is in qualitative agreement with the result obtained for the shape of the ht contribution for the non - singlet approach for the @xmath87 structure function @xcite .
one could see from fig .
[ graph6 ] that the opposite inequality takes place for small values @xmath88 : @xmath89 .
this work could be considered as a continuation of our work @xcite , in which for the first time the apt approach was applied to the analysis of the @xmath2 structure function data . in this work
, we used a combined set of data presented by various collaborations .
thus , a new kinematic region of experimental data @xmath90 gev@xmath10 was included in analysis . as a result , the qcd scale parameter @xmath47
, the parameters of the shape of the structure function and the @xmath3-shape of the higher twist contribution were defined with high accuracy .
the shape of this contribution is in qualitative agreement with the results of the previous analysis of the @xmath2 structure function data .
we compared the difference of the results of the pt and apt analysis with the corridor of experimental uncertainties .
we revealed that the most essential difference in the pt and apt results should be expected for small @xmath5 and large numbers of mellin moments , which approximately corresponds to large values of a variable @xmath3 .
it is a pleasure for the authors to thank s. v. mikhailov , o. v. teryaev and v. l. khandramai for interest in this work and helpful discussions .
this research was supported by the jinr - belrffr grant f14d-007 , the heisenberg - landau program 2014 , jinr - bulgaria collaborative grant , and by the rfbr grants ( nos .
12 - 02 - 00613 , 13 - 02 - 01005 and 14 - 01 - 00647 ) .
a. j. buras , _ rev . mod .
phys . _ * 52 * , 199 ( 1980 ) .
v. g. krivokhizhin and a. v. kotikov , _ phys .
_ * 40 * , 1059 ( 2009 ) .
f. j. yndurain , _ the theory of quark and gluon interactions _ , 4th ed .
( springer , 2006 ) . | high - precision measurements deep inelastic scattering open testing new theoretical ideas kinematic range @xmath3 @xmath5 present paper report results analytic approach qcd analytic perturbation theory apt to qcd analysis experimental data @xmath2 structure function contrast perturbative running coupling spoiled unphysical singularities infrared region scale @xmath6 apt analytic coupling has no unphysical singularities stimulated applications apt modifications supporting correct analytic properties for physical processes after generalization apt method to noninteger powers running coupling paper continuation of previous analysis @xmath2 structure function data ccfr collaboration analysis experimental @xmath2 data cdhs scat bebc - gargamelle bebc - wa59 nutev chorus similar perturbative analysis performed earlier new data nutev chorus collaborations published present analysis result disagreement cdhs data with perturbative qcd small @xmath3 cut @xmath7 applied to data total experimental points 289 exceeds considered before ref allows determine parameters form @xmath2 structure function precisely kinematic region combined set data is @xmath8 and @xmath9@xmath10 previous analysis ref @xcite kinematic region @xmath11 gev@xmath10 included region provides precise determination parameter @xmath1 higher twist ht contribution direct comparison perturbation theory pt apt results data introduce normalization factors individual collaboration sec . 2 present relevant theoretical expressions analysis sec. 3 qcd fit results pt apt approaches compare deviation apt pt with experimental uncertainties summarizing remarks sec necessary expressions analysis written outline follow approach jacobi polynomial expansion of structure functions method solution gribov parisi evolution equation @xcite proposed in refs @xcite developed for unpolarized polarized cases main formula allows approximate reconstruction structure function through finite number mellin moments @xmath12 @xmath13 ht term @xmath14 jacobi polynomials @xmath15 @xmath16- @xmath17-dependent euler @xmath18-functions @xmath19 jacobi polynomial parameters minimization error reconstruction structure function perturbative renormalization group @xmath5 evolution of moments known refs@xcite leading order reads @xmath20^{\nu }[\alpha _ s}(q_{0}^{2})]^{\nu}} m_3(n , q^2_0 ) \nu(n)}={{{\gamma_{ns}^{(0),n}}/{2\beta_0 } } ~n = 2,~3 , ... \ @xmath21 qcd running coupling @xmath22 nonsinglet one - loop anomalous dimensions @xmath23 first coefficient renormalization group @xmath17-function @xmath24 number active flavors unknown quantity @xmath25 parameterized mellin moments structure function @xmath2 @xmath26 @xmath27 shape function @xmath28 parameters @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 scale parameter @xmath1 found fit combined @xmath2-data @xcite detailed description fitting procedure ref target mass corrections order @xmath33 nuclear effect @xmath2 analytic approach qcd @xcite combining renormalization group resummation correct analytic properties @xmath5-variable physical quantities moments structure functions analytic functions complex @xmath5 plane cut negative real axis@xcite details ordinary pt description violates analytic properties framework apt analytic coupling no unphysical singularities low-@xmath5 domain rapidly changing @xmath5 evolution pt apt approach slowly changing functions refs @xcite asymptotic region large @xmath5 apt pt results coincide results leading order qcd fit combined @xmath2-data pt apt approaches presented table 1 figs pt apt considered kinematic conditions @xmath53 gev@xmath10 @xmath54 gev@xmath10 active flavours @xmath55 @xmath56 values @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath28 @xmath47 free parameters tab:1 table 1 analysis combined @xmath2-data allows determine good accuracy values parameter @xmath1 values different for pt apt cases consistent errors errors table 1 correspond to @xmath57 increased volume experimental data present analysis errors for @xmath58 @xmath59 less than previous analysis ccfr data@xcite @xmath60 @xmath61 mev table 1 highest twist contribution defined more precisely previous analysis @xcite comparison see fig . 4 @xcite fig. graph6 belowturn to fig . extracted @xmath47-values point with experimental errors point in region of small powers of @xmath62 @xmath63 corresponds to small numbers mellin moments small values of @xmath3 figure 2 shows @xmath2-shape in apt and pt cases result apt approach higher than pt small @xmath3 less for large @xmath3 consider difference between pt and apt fit results experimental errors what areas deviation beyond experimental uncertainties apt - fit result ? difference in @xmath3-shape @xmath2 structure function @xmath64 with experimental uncertainties @xmath65 @xmath66@xmath10 gray color shows corridor of experimental errors for @xmath65 difference @xmath67 beyond experimental errors at small @xmath68 large values @xmath3 @xmath69 large @xmath3 values deviation results pt from apt exceeds width corridor of experimental errors figure graph4 shows difference between moments in pt and apt determined eqs .[ evol - pt ] evol - apt ] ) @xmath70 function of number mellin moments including non integral value @xmath71 ) in range @xmath72 at values @xmath73 @xmath74 comparing results graph4 small @xmath5-values difference @xmath75 beyond errors at @xmath76 exceeds errors at @xmath77 @xmath78 effect less pronounced consider difference between pt and apt approaches for evolution factor @xmath79 given by @xmath80^{$ for pt @xmath81 for apt consider quantity @xmath82 function of noninteger @xmath36 at @xmath53 gev@xmath10 present @xmath83 in fig . graph5 ] for values @xmath73 and @xmath74 shaded area shows experimental uncertainties of @xmath84 related with errors of parameter @xmath52 greatest difference between results pt apt approaches at low @xmath5 large numbers mellin moments @xmath71 corresponds to large values variable @xmath3 graph6 ] results of @xmath3 dependence for higher twists contribution in pt and apt approaches presented qualitative agreementresults with papers extraction highest twists structure function @xmath2 @xcite accuracy definition function @xmath28 increased result @xcite analysis ccfr data previous analysis noticed @xmath85 @xmath86 @xcite confirm relation with higher accuracy inequality agreement with result shape ht contribution non - singlet approach @xmath87 structure function @xcite opposite inequality for small values @xmath88 : @xmath89 work continuation of work @xcite apt approach applied analysis @xmath2 structure function data used combined set data collaborations new kinematic region experimental data @xmath90 gev@xmath10 included analysis qcd scale parameter @xmath47 parameters shape structure function @xmath3-shape of higher twist contribution defined high accuracy shape contribution qualitative agreement with previous analysis @xmath2 structure function data compared difference results pt and apt analysis with experimental uncertainties essential difference in pt apt results expected for small @xmath5 large numbers mellin moments corresponds to large values variable @xmath3 authors thank s. v. mikhailov o v. teryaev v. l. khandramai for interest discussionsresearch supported jinr - belrffr grant-007 heisenberg - landau program 2014 jinr - bulgaria grant rfbr grants 12 - 02 - 00613 13 - 02 - 01005 14 - 01 - 00647 buras phys. 52 199 1980 krivokhizhin kotikov. 40 1059 2009 yndurain theory quark gluon interactions 4th ed. springer 2006 | 0.501865 | 3,191 | 1,673 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,685 | i describe the ir and x - ray observational campaign we have undertaken for the purpose of determining the nature of the faint discrete x - ray source population discovered by chandra in the galactic center ( gc ) .
data obtained for this project includes a deep chandra survey of the galactic bulge ; deep , high resolution ir imaging from vlt / isaac , ctio / ispi , and the ukidss galactic plane survey ( gps ) ; and ir spectroscopy from vlt / isaac and irtf / spex . by cross - correlating the gc x - ray imaging from chandra with our ir surveys ,
we identify candidate counterparts to the x - ray sources via astrometry . using a detailed ir extinction map
, we are deriving magnitudes and colors for all the candidates .
having thus established a target list , we will use the multi - object ir spectrograph flamingos-2 on gemini - south to carry out a spectroscopic survey of the candidate counterparts , to search for emission line signatures which are a hallmark of accreting binaries . by determining the nature of these x - ray sources
, this flamingos-2 galactic center survey will have a dramatic impact on our knowledge of the galactic accreting binary population .
address = dept . of astronomy ,
university of florida , gainesville , fl 32611 usa address = dept . of astrophysics ,
university of oxford , oxford ox1 3rh , uk , altaddress = department of physical sciences , p.o .
box 3000 , 90014 university of oulu , finland address = dept . of astronomy ,
university of florida , gainesville , fl 32611 usa address = california institute of technology , pasadena , ca 91125 usa address = dept . of astrophysics ,
university of oxford , oxford ox1 3rh , uk address = dept . of astrophysics ,
university of oxford , oxford ox1 3rh , uk address = dept . of astronomy ,
university of florida , gainesville , fl 32611 usa address = dept . of astronomy ,
university of florida , gainesville , fl 32611 usa | the unprecedented sensitivity and angular resolution of _ chandra _ has been utilized by wang _
et al . _ ( 2002 ; hereafter w02 @xcite ) and muno _ et al . _ ( 2003 ; hereafter m03 @xcite ) to investigate the x - ray source population of the galactic center ( gc ) .
the w02 acis - i survey of the central 0.8@xmath0@xmath12@xmath0of the gc revealed a population of @xmath2800 previously undiscovered discrete weak sources with x - ray luminosities of @xmath3@xmath4erg@xmath4s@xmath5 .
m03 imaged the central 40 pc@xmath6 ( at 8 kpc ) around sgr a * , finding an additional @xmath22300 discrete point sources down to a limiting flux of @xmath7 erg / s .
more recently , a deeper _ chandra _ survey of the central @xmath21@xmath0around sgr a * has been obtained ; the combination of all of these surveys has revealed a total of @xmath810,000 discrete sources ( figure 1 ; muno _ et al . _ 2008 ,
hereafter m08 @xcite ) .
the harder ( @xmath93 kev ) x - ray sources are likely to be at the distance of the gc , while the softer sources are likely to be foreground x - ray active stars or cvs within a few kpc of the sun .
some individual sources have been identified as x - ray transients , high - mass stars , lmxbs , and cvs
. however , the nature of the majority of these newly detected sources is as yet unknown .
we have undertaken an ir and x - ray observational campaign to determine the nature of the faint discrete x - ray source population discovered by _
chandra _ in the gc .
we have begun by cross - correlating the source catalog of muno _ et al . _ ( 2006 ; hereafter m06 @xcite ) with @xmath10images of 26 selected 2.5@xmath11@xmath6 regions obtained with isaac on the vlt to identify candidate ir counterparts to the x - ray sources @xcite . our original search for the counterparts to the gc x - ray sources used positions obtained through private communication with the authors of the w02 survey .
however , m06 re - analyzed the data and produced a significant refinement of the astrometry of the w02 data ; thus the positions reported for @xmath250% of the x - ray sources in the finalized m06 catalog showed a shift of @xmath12@xmath11 from the positions we used for our original cross - correlation analysis .
this astrometric shift has a substantial impact on the identification of candidate ir counterparts , since the average stellar separation in our vlt fields is 1.94@xmath11 in @xmath13-band @xcite .
in addition , the revised m06 analysis revealed that a larger number of x - ray sources were detected in the original _
chandra _ survey than had been previously cataloged . as a result
, our vlt imaging survey covers 130 x - ray sources , compared to the 77 x - ray sources originally reported in @xcite . ; _ middle , green _ : @xmath14 ; and _ right , red _ : @xmath15 .
the large extension towards high values of colour ( _ right _ in each panel ) indicates that there is a significant amount of near - ir extinction.,scaledwidth=99.0% ] comparing the colours and magnitudes of the candidate counterparts to the general field populations ( figure 2 ) , we find no clearly significant difference between the magnitude distribution of candidate counterparts and those of the field population , aside a slight over - abundance of more local , bright , blue candidate counterparts ( see especially the left - hand panel of figure 2 ) .
the colours indicate that the majority of potential counterparts are located at or beyond gc distances ( @xmath16 ) , with a smaller number consistent with a foreground stellar population .
@xmath17 ( 40 ) of the x - ray sources that lie within the area covered by our vlt observations do not have detections within the x - ray error circle in any of the three ir bands .
@xmath18 ( 76 ) of the x - ray sources had zero candidate counterpart detections in the @xmath19-band , compared to @xmath20 ( 63 ) for the @xmath21-band and only @xmath22 ( 47 ) for the @xmath23-band . to examine the significance of these numbers of `` non - matches ''
, we performed a monte carlo test .
we added a random 0@xmath11 30@xmath11 shift to the position of each x - ray source , re - ran the matching of the x - ray and ir data , and recorded the number of candidate counterparts identified for the match ; we performed this test 10,000 times , having different random shifts in the x - ray position for each trial .
the monte carlo test revealed that , given randomized x - ray positions , the expected fraction of x - ray sources that would have no ir counterparts across all three bands is 41.6@xmath244.3% ( @xmath25 error ) . for the actual positions , @xmath17 of x - ray sources had no candidate ir counterpart , which is @xmath26 _
lower_. similarly for @xmath19 , @xmath21 and @xmath23-bands considered individually , the monte carlo simulation revealed that the fraction of x - ray sources for which there would be no matches if the x - ray sources are randomly scattered across the fields are 64.8@xmath244.1% , 58.3@xmath244.3% and 47.5@xmath244.4% respectively .
the numbers of `` non - matches '' for the _ true _ x - ray positions are thus _ lower _ than would be expected from random at the @xmath27 , @xmath28 and @xmath29 levels for @xmath19 , @xmath21 and @xmath23 respectively .
this result indicates that even with the extremely high ir source density in the gc , with the corrected and accurate x - ray astrometry we are now finding significantly _ more _ x - ray / ir matches than would be expected from chance coincidence .
from our analysis of the vlt images , we find that the ir extinction in the gc can vary on scales as small as 5@xmath11 ( 0.2 - 0.6 pc at 8 kpc ; @xcite ) .
some areas show little evidence of this `` granularity '' , while others are highly structured .
the relationship of extinction to wavelength in the ir is a power law with slope @xmath30 @xcite ; the `` canonical '' value for @xmath30 is @xmath22 @xcite . in contrast , for the gc we find a mean value of @xmath31 ; and furthermore , along any given line of sight to the gc @xmath30 varies substantially , ranging from @xmath21.83.6 @xcite .
we find that the `` universal '' ir extinction law is _ not _ universal in the gc . therefore to obtain reddening - corrected stellar photometry in the gc , a local value for the @xmath10extinction ( on scales @xmath32@xmath11 ) must be measured and applied .
the primary accretion signature in the @xmath13-band which distinguishes a true x - ray counterpart from a field star is strong brackett @xmath33 emission ; this technique of identifying xrb counterparts has been verified with observations of several well - studied gc xrbs @xcite . with this technique , using spex on irtf we conclusively identified a heavily - reddened early - type star as the ir counterpart to the gc source `` edd-1 '' ( cxogc j174536.1 - 285638 ; @xcite ) . however , for an additional 16 candidate counterparts for which we obtained @xmath13-band spectra with isaac , we did not detect br-@xmath33emission .
a possible explanation is that the accretion signatures could be too weak to be measureable , for example if the accretion rate was low at the time of observation , or if the emission was self - absorbed by the mass donor .
however , a more likely explanation is that the stars we observed are not the true counterparts to the x - ray sources .
our imaging survey had a limiting magnitude of @xmath13=20 , so our spectroscopic data would only detect xrbs with either early - type ( as in `` edd-1 '' ) or evolved mass donors . therefore it is likely that the majority of the true ir counterparts belong to a lower mass population of stars which includes the mass donors of cvs and lmxbs ( as has been suggested by @xcite , and other authors ) ; at gc distances , these counterparts are fainter than the limits of our survey .
cross - correlation of our ir imaging of the gc with the _ chandra _ surveys will produce a large number of ir candidate counterparts to the x - ray sources .
due to the extremely high stellar density in the nuclear bulge , many of these astrometric `` matches '' are likely to be chance superpositions , as indicated by our initial spectroscopic data . with thousands of candidate counterparts , traditional long - slit single - target spectroscopy would be a prohibitively inefficient method by which to identify true counterparts .
thus we will need to follow - up with multi - object ir spectroscopy to find the true matches : this is the work which will be performed with the flamingos-2 galactic center survey . | unprecedented sensitivity angular resolution of chandra utilized by wang muno 2003 investigate x - ray source population galactic center w02 survey central 0.8@xmath0 revealed @xmath2800 weak sources with x - ray luminosities @xmath3 m03 imaged central 40 pc@xmath6 around sgr a additional @xmath22300 discrete sources flux @xmath7 erg / s deeper _ chandra survey of central @xmath21@xmath0around sgr obtained @xmath810,000 discrete sources figure 1 harder ( @xmath93 x - ray sources likely at distance of gc softer sources foreground x - ray active stars cvs within few kpc of sun some sources identified as x - ray transients high - mass stars lmxbs cvs nature of majority sources unknown undertaken ir x - ray observational campaign to determine nature of faint discrete x - ray source population discovered by chandra in gc cross - correlating source catalog of muno et al 2006 m06 @xcite @xmath10images 26 selected 2.5@xmath11@xmath6 regions isaac vlt identify candidate ir counterparts x - ray sources original search counterparts gc x - ray sources used positions private communication authors w02 survey m06 re - analyzed data refinement astrometry w02 data positions @xmath250% x - ray sources finalized m06 catalog shift @xmath12@xmath11 positions original cross - correlation analysis astrometric shift identification candidate ir counterparts average stellar separation vlt fields 1.94@xmath11 @xmath13-band @xcite revised m06 analysis larger number x - ray sources detected original chandra survey vlt imaging survey covers 130 x - ray sources compared 77 originally @xcite @xmath14 @xmath15 large extension towards high values colour indicates significant near - ir extinction comparing colours magnitudes candidate counterparts general field populations figure 2 no significant difference magnitude distribution candidate counterparts field population slight over - abundance local , bright blue candidate counterparts majority potential counterparts at or beyond gc distances @xmath16 ) smaller number consistent foreground stellar population@xmath17 ( 40 ) x - ray sources vlt observations detections error circle in three ir bands @xmath18 ( 76 ) zero candidate counterpart detections in @xmath19-band compared to @xmath20 ( 63 ) @xmath22 ( 47 ) @xmath23-band non - matches performed monte carlo test added random 0@xmath11 30@xmath11 shift to position each x - ray source re - ran matching data recorded candidate counterparts performed test 10,000 times different random shifts position expected fraction sources no ir counterparts across all three bands is 41.6@xmath244.3% ( @xmath25 error ) @xmath17 had no candidate ir counterpart @xmath26 _ lower for @xmath19 @xmath21 @xmath23-bands fraction sources no matches are 64.8@xmath244.1% , 58.3@xmath244.3% 47.5@xmath244.4% numbers `` non - matches '' for true x - ray positions lower than expected from random at @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 levels for @xmath19 @xmath21 @xmath23result indicates high ir source density in gc corrected x - ray astrometry finding more x - ray / ir matches coincidence analysis vlt images ir extinction gc scales 5@xmath11 ( 0.2 - 0.6 pc at 8 kpc ; @xcite some areas little others structured relationship extinction to wavelength ir power law with slope @xmath30 @xcite canonical value @xmath22 @xcite gc mean value @xmath31 @xmath30 varies from @xmath21.83.6 @xcite universal ir extinction law not universal in gc reddening - corrected stellar photometry local value @xmath10extinction scales @xmath32@xmath11 must measured primary accretion signature in @xmath13-band distinguishes x - ray counterpart from field star is strong brackett @xmath33 emission identifying xrb counterparts verified with observations gc xrbs identified heavily - reddened early - type star as ir counterpart to gc source edd-1 '' ( j174536.1 - 285638 ; @xcite ) additional 16 candidate counterparts detect br-@xmath33emissionpossible explanation accretion signatures weak rate low or emission self - absorbed by mass donor likely explanation stars observed not true counterparts to x - ray sources imaging survey limiting magnitude @xmath13=20 data detect xrbs with early - type or evolved mass donors likely majority true ir counterparts belong to lower mass population donors cvs and lmxbs at gc distances counterparts fainter than limits survey cross - correlation ir imaging with _ chandra _ surveys large number ir candidate counterparts to x - ray sources high stellar density in nuclear bulge astrometric matches likely chance superpositions thousands candidate counterparts traditional long - slit single - target spectroscopy inefficient to identify true counterparts need follow - up with multi - object ir spectroscopy to find true matches work performed with flamingos-2 galactic center survey | 0.324742 | 2,098 | 1,089 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,692 | we study the pion distributions in jets produced in heavy - ion collisions in association with trigger particles restricted to definite momentum ranges .
we determine the centrality dependence of the associated particle distributions for both d+au and au+au collisions in the recombination model .
the central - to - peripheral ratios show significant dependence on centrality for au+au collisions , but negligible dependence for d+au collisions .
the results are in agreement with the qualitative features of the data . 0.5 cm pacs numbers : 25.75.dw , 25.75.gz = 6.5 in = -0.5 in oits 765.1 + july 2005 to be submitted to the + brief report section of the + phys .
rev . c. .75 cm
* rudolph c. hwa@xmath0 and zhiguang tan@xmath1 * .5 cm @xmath0institute of theoretical science and department of physics + university of oregon , eugene , or 97403 - 5203 , usa + @xmath2institute of particle physics , hua - zhong normal university , wuhan 430079 , p. r. china .5 cm in an earlier paper @xcite dihadron correlation in jets produced in heavy - ion collisions ( hic ) was studied in the recombination model @xcite . in that paper the distribution of particles ( @xmath3 at @xmath4 ) associated with a trigger ( @xmath3 at @xmath5 ) was calculated ; it is the conditional distribution for every fixed @xmath5 , denoted by @xmath6 in @xcite this equation is expressed in eq . ( 18 ) there in a form that exposes the hard parton integration .
equation ( [ 1 ] ) was then integrated over @xmath5 for trigger momentum in the range @xmath7 gev / c , corresponding to one of the trigger windows of the star experiment @xcite at the relativistic heavy - ion collider ( rhic ) . however , that integrated result does not correspond to the quantity that is presented by star as the measured associated particle distribution ( apd ) . instead of the integral of the ratio in eq .
( [ 1 ] ) , the experimental apd thus far analyzed is the ratio of the integrals @xmath8 where @xmath9 the ratio in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) was calculated in @xcite for central au+au collisions , and was shown to be in reasonable agreement with the data when due consideration of the differences in the particle types measured is taken into account . in this short paper
we show the centrality dependence of the apd in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) for both d+au and au+au collisions , as well as for two different ranges of the trigger momentum .
it should be noted that if the ranges of integration over @xmath5 in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) are taken to be infinitesimal , there is no essential difference between eqs .
( [ 1 ] ) and ( [ 2 ] ) .
there is nothing wrong with eq .
( [ 1 ] ) , which corresponds to the usual conditional probability often considered in statistical physics .
the apd in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) with a significant range of 2 gev / c for the trigger @xmath10 is preferred for data analysis mainly to gain better experimental statistics . over the intermediate @xmath10 region
where the calculated apds decrease by three orders of magnitudes , they do not differ by very much in the general shape whether eqs .
( [ 1 ] ) or ( [ 2 ] ) is used . however , the ratio of the distributions for central to peripheral collisions depends more sensitively on the trigger range .
the calculation of that ratio according to eq .
( [ 2 ] ) is the main objective of this work . as in @xcite
, we consider here only the correlation between two pions , @xmath11 , one being the trigger particle in two trigger windows , the other being the associated particle in the range @xmath12 .
this is a simpler and trackable system than what has been measured , which includes all charged hadrons , but is rich enough in the various recombination components to provide a meaningful representation of the apd . in our calculation
we use the basic formulas in the recombination model @xcite , for which @xmath13 is @xmath14 , \label{4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the thermal - thermal recombination component ( @xmath15 ) has been omitted , since we study here the particles in a jet . in eq .
( [ 4 ] ) @xmath16 is the distribution of hard partons in hic and is proportional to the number of binary collisions @xmath17 ; @xmath18 is the average fraction of hard partons that emerge from the dense medium to hadronize outside .
@xmath19 is the thermal parton distribution @xcite , whose parametrization for au+au collisions has now been extended to all centralities @xcite .
@xmath20 is the shower parton distribution ( spd ) given in @xcite .
@xmath21 is the fragmentation function from hard parton @xmath22 to pion and accounts for the shower - shower recombination component . for @xmath23 in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) we have @xmath24 where @xmath25 is the recombination function for the formation of a pion , and @xmath26 is 4-parton distribution , which in our case here is @xmath27 where the @xmath15 terms have been omitted for the same reason as in eq .
( [ 4 ] ) .
the details of how @xmath28 and @xmath29 are expressed in terms of spds are described in @xcite . for d+au collisions the hard parton distribution @xmath16 and
the parameters of the thermal distributions at various centralities are given in @xcite , while for au+au collisions the corresponding quantities are given in @xcite .
we now can calculate the apd in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) for d+au collisions , as well as for au+au collisions , for all centralities .
the results for @xmath30 are shown in figs . 1 and 2 for trigger windows @xmath7 gev / c and @xmath31 gev / c , respectively .
what is notable in these figures is that there is negligible centrality dependence in ( a ) for d+au collisions , but significant dependence in ( b ) for au+au collisions .
the ratios dau(cent)/dau(peri ) and auau(cent)/auau(peri ) are shown in fig . 3 as functions of the momentum of the associated particle .
the solid lines in fig .
3 are for au+au collisions and are far from 1 , indicating appreciable dependence on centrality . at @xmath32 gev
/ c the ratio is about 3 , which implies that the thermal partons in central collisions drastically enhance the production of hadrons .
the data shown in triangles are from star @xcite for auau(0 - 5%)/pp for trigger in @xmath33 gev / c with all charged hadrons included in the associated particles .
our result agree with the data for @xmath34 gev / c .
other analysis of the star data @xcite are also in support of our result .
the large factor of 3 around @xmath35 gev / c would be hard to attain by the medium modification of the fragmentation function , if fragmentation is considered instead of recombination for hadronization .
the dashed lines for d+au collisions are just above 1 , and are virtually indistinguishable from one another in the two trigger window cases .
the data shown are preliminary results from phenix on the ratio of the apds for 0 - 20% d+au to p+p collisions for all charged hadrons on the near side in association with a pion trigger in the @xmath10 range of 5 - 10 gev / c @xcite . despite the differences in the calculated and measured quantities
, the general agreement between the two suggests that our model calculation has captured the essence of the nature of the correlation .
there are also other preliminary experimental data on conditional yield in d+au collisions that show approximate independence on centrality @xcite .
the reason why there is less centrality dependence in d+au collisions is that the thermal - shower component plays a much less prominant role than it does in au+au collisions . since the parts in the factors @xmath36 in @xmath13 and @xmath23 in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) that depend on @xmath17 cancel each other , only the @xmath37 terms in eqs .
( [ 4 ] ) and ( [ 6 ] ) produce the centrality dependence , and they are minor in d+au collisions . for au+au collisions
@xmath38 recombination is insignificant in the intermdediate @xmath10 region , so the @xmath39 terms are dominant in eqs .
( [ 4 ] ) and ( [ 6 ] ) , resulting in the dependence on centrality shown in part ( b ) of figs . 1 and 2 .
figure 3 exhibits the difference of the two colliding systems in terms of ratios .
we have calculated the associated particle distributions only for @xmath40 gev / c because our formalism for particle production is not reliable for @xmath41 gev / c .
for that reason we do not integrate the associated particle distribution to determine the yield per trigger , since it is dominated by the contribution from the low @xmath10 region . nevertheless , by inspection of the distributions in figs . 1 and 2
, it is clear that the yield / trigger is not likely to depend on centrality very much for d+au collisions , but significantly for au+au collisions .
our conclusion is that when the associated particle distributions are calculated as the ratio of the integrals given in eq .
( [ 2 ] ) , we find significant dependence on centrality for au+au collisions @xcite , but negligible dependence on centrality for d+au collisions , and is in agreement with the data @xcite .
this work was supported , in part , by the u. s. department of energy under grant no .
de - fg03 - 96er40972
. 99 r. c. hwa and c. b. yang , phys .
rev .
c * 70 * , 054902 ( 2004 ) .
r. c. hwa and c. b. yang , phys .
rev .
c * 70 * , 024905 ( 04 ) .
star collaboration , c. adler _ et al .
_ , phys .
rev .
lett . *
90 * , 082302 ( 2003 ) ; j. adams _ et al .
, ibid .
_ * 91 * , 072304 ( 2003 ) ; nucl - ex/0501016 ; f. wang , j. phys .
g * 30 * , s1299 ( 2004 ) .
r. c. hwa and z. tan , nucl - th/0503052v2 , phys .
rev .
c ( to be published ) .
r. c. hwa and c. b. yang , phys .
rev .
c * 70 * , 024904 ( 2004 ) .
r. c. hwa and c. b. yang , phys .
rev .
lett . * 93 * , 082302 ( 2004 ) .
j. adams et al ( star collaboration ) , nucl - ex/0501016 .
y. guo ( for star collaboration ) , riken bnl research center workshop on jet correlations at rhic " , march 2005 .
n. grau ( for phenix collaboration ) , riken bnl research center workshop on jet correlations at rhic " , march 2005 .
j. bielcikova ( for star collaboration ) , riken bnl research center workshop on jet correlations at rhic " , march 2005 . | fig . 1 . associated particle distribution for @xmath3 as trigger in the range @xmath42 gev / c and for @xmath3 as the associated particle in the range @xmath43 gev / c for all centralities in ( a ) d+au collisions and ( b ) au+au collisions . fig . 2 . associated particle distribution for @xmath3 as trigger in the range @xmath44 gev / c and for @xmath3 as the associated particle in the range @xmath45 gev / c for all centralities in ( a ) d+au collisions and ( b ) au+au collisions .
3 . ratios of auau(central)/auau(peripheral ) and dau(central)/dau(peripheral ) as functions of the momentum of associated @xmath3 for two trigger windows .
the data in triangles are from @xcite for auau(0 - 5%)/pp with trigger in @xmath46 gev / c .
the shaded region shows the systematic uncertainties .
the data in squares are preliminary results from phenix @xcite for dau(0 - 20%)/pp for all charged hadrons on the near side in association with pion trigger in the interval @xmath47 gev / c . | fig . 1 particle distribution @xmath3 trigger @xmath42 gev / c gev / c centralities d+au au+au collisions fig 2 particle distribution @xmath3 @xmath44 gev / c @xmath45 gev / c centralities d+au au+au collisions ratios auau(central)(peripheral dau functions momentum @xmath3 two trigger windows data triangles @xcite auau(0 - 5%)/pp trigger @xmath46 gev / c shaded region systematic uncertainties data squares preliminary results phenix @xcite dau(0 - 20%)/pp charged hadrons side pion trigger interval @xmath47 gev / c | 0.070892 | 268 | 140 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,694 | 1.0 cm 1.0 cm we test the quark mass dependence implemented in the quasiparticle dispersion relations of our quasiparticle model for the qcd equation of state by comparing with recently available lattice qcd data near @xmath0 employing almost physical quark masses .
in addition , we emphasize the capability of our model to successfully describe lattice qcd results for imaginary chemical potential and to analytically continue the latter to real chemical potential . | the equation of state of strongly interacting matter is of paramount interest for understanding and describing the dynamics of relativistic heavy - ion collisions and the early universe and compact stellar objects as well .
the grand canonical potential @xmath1 depends on a set of intensive quantities ( temperature @xmath2 , various chemical potentials accumulated in @xmath3 ) , and parameters like quark masses , flavor number @xmath4 and color number @xmath5 . for qcd as theory of hadrons and quarks and gluons these parameters
are fixed , but it is instructive to study their impact on @xmath1 , given the complexity of qcd .
of particular interest is @xmath1 near the demarcation line ( phase boundary ) @xmath6 of hadrons vs. quarks and gluons .
this region is probed in heavy - ion collisions @xcite and is traversed in the cosmic evolution @xcite . to parameterize the equation of state near @xmath0
we employ a quasiparticle model ( qpm ) @xcite which is adjusted to available lattice qcd data .
the striking simplicity of the model consists in the expressions for net baryon density @xmath7 and entropy density @xmath8 reading @xmath9 @xmath10 + \epsilon_i\frac{(\omega_i-\mu_i)/t}{e^{(\omega_i-\mu_i)/t}+\epsilon_i } + [ \mu_i \rightarrow -\mu_i ] \right ) \
, , \label{eq.2}\ ] ] where @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 and @xmath15 . the pressure @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is the volume , is to be calculated consistently with eqs .
( [ eq.1 ] , [ eq.2 ] ) , cf . @xcite .
we restrict here our attention onto considering one independent chemical potential @xmath18 .
@xmath19 are the dispersion relations for the quasiparticle excitations with self - energies @xmath20 in line with 1-loop approximations and a procedure to include nonzero quark masses according to @xcite @xmath21 where @xmath22 . in the quark sector , the rest masses @xmath23 contain a true rest mass term @xmath24 and an artificial lattice
mass term @xmath25 introduced for calculational purposes on the lattice , @xmath26 .
the interaction generates the self - energy contributions @xmath27 with @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
@xmath32 is an effective coupling strength parametrized at @xmath33 via @xmath34 \!\ !
g^2_{\rm 2-loop}(\zeta(t_c ) ) + b \left(1{-}\frac{t}{t_c}\right ) , \ t{\,<\,}t_c \end{array } \right.\ ] ] with @xmath35 , and approaches smoothly the perturbative region at large temperatures .
near @xmath0 , @xmath32 becomes large , and the shift parameter @xmath36 regulates the coupling .
below @xmath0 , the coupling changes drastically its behavior . the model may be considered as a resummed expression for the thermodynamic potential , as a formal power expansion in @xmath32 generates an infinite series of terms , including also a term proportional to the plasmon term , for instance .
it goes beyond a perturbative expansion scheme as result of the effective coupling @xmath32 , which also may repair possible shortcomings of the 1-loop inspired parameterizations of the dispersion relations . in this form
, the model does not contain critical point ( cf .
@xcite ) or color - flavor locking effects ( cf .
@xcite ) . despite of its simplicity
, the equation of state for real and imaginary chemical potential as well as various susceptibilities are described very well @xcite in the qpm . here
, we describe one new aspect of our model , namely a naive chiral extrapolation of the equation of state .
we emphasize also the capability to extrapolate lattice qcd results from imaginary @xmath18 to real @xmath18 .
we focus on the region @xmath37 , where interaction effects are strong .
it is the region of the strongly coupled quark - gluon plasma @xcite presently explored experimentally at rhic and in near future at lhc and later on at fair .
the qpm parametrization of the lattice qcd results @xcite for @xmath38 with fairly large quark masses , i.e. @xmath39 and @xmath40 , was already presented in @xcite for the scaled pressure @xmath41 at @xmath42 .
the qpm parameters read @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 for @xmath46 .
now we try to accomplish a chiral extrapolation by means of eq .
( [ equ : self ] ) .
neglecting naively a conceivable dependence of @xmath47 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 on @xmath23 , the extrapolated results are exhibited in the left panel of figure [ fig : pnf2 + 1extrap ] ( dashed curve ) for @xmath50 and @xmath51 , corresponding to the set - up in @xcite .
these lattice qcd results @xcite ( squares ) are astonishingly well reproduced , however , by the price of changing the pressure integration constant , @xmath52 , which needs to be readjusted in order to generate the small pressure below @xmath0 .
we note that putting @xmath53 in the strikt chiral limit does not change noticeably the dashed curve on the scale exhibited in figure 1 .
another important test @xcite of the suitability of our hydrodynamic eos is the interaction measure @xmath54 , where @xmath55 denotes the energy density .
as shown in the right panel of figure [ fig : pnf2 + 1extrap ] , the qpm for almost physical quark masses ( i.e. , @xmath50 and @xmath51 ) faithfully reproduces corresponding lattice qcd data @xcite of @xmath56 .
the peak , which is related to the softest point in the qcd equation of state , is located at @xmath57 . for larger temperatures ,
the interaction measure approaches logarithmically zero according to the temperature dependence in the effective coupling @xmath32 , though , is close to the conformal limit @xmath58 already for @xmath59 .
in this section , qcd thermodynamics for @xmath60 at nonzero imaginary chemical potential @xmath61 is considered .
the net quark number density @xmath62 reads in the qpm @xcite @xmath63 which is purely imaginary and an odd function in @xmath64 . in figure
[ fig : densnqimmu ] ( left panel ) , qpm results for @xmath65 , employing the parametrization from @xcite , are compared with the lattice qcd results @xcite . in particular , the pronounced bending for @xmath66 close to @xmath67 , which signals the onset of the first - order roberge - weiss transition @xcite , is accurately reproduced representing a sensible test of the qpm at nonzero @xmath7 . in the qpm , the bending is driven by the increasing @xmath64 dependence in the quasiparticle dispersion relation @xmath68 close to @xmath69 . for temperatures
@xmath70 we observe an independence of @xmath71 considered as a function of @xmath72 on the explicit value of @xmath2 .
this independence follows from eq .
( [ equ : densquarkimmu2 ] ) as long as @xmath68 is approximately independent of @xmath64 .
+ the phase boundary @xmath73 for @xmath60 is shown in the right panel of figure [ fig : densnqimmu ] for imaginary as well as for real baryo - chemical potential @xmath74 , which is accessible by analytic continuation . within the qpm ,
an estimate for @xmath73 follows as self - consistent solution of a partial differential equation based on maxwell s relation emerging at @xmath75 ( cf .
@xmath73 for imaginary @xmath76 and the first roberge - weiss transition line cross each other at @xmath77 and @xmath78 being close to the lattice qcd results @xmath79 and @xmath80 @xcite
. the features of the phase diagram in the imaginary chemical potential sector can be described as follows .
dashed curves represent the analytic sections of the first two roberge - weiss transition lines @xmath81 ( here @xmath82 ) turning into first - order transitions ( solid section ) while the dotted curve shows the first @xmath83 center symmetry line @xmath84 .
the roberge - weiss periodicity @xcite implies that sectors between @xmath85 and @xmath86 ( sector ii for @xmath87 ) are repeated copies of sector i between @xmath88 and @xmath89 .
the subsector between @xmath90 and @xmath89 ( sector i ) is a reflected copy of the subsector between @xmath88 and @xmath91 ( sector i ) mirrored at the first roberge - weiss transition line .
in summary we show that the quasiparticle model with the chosen dispersion relations for quarks and gluons accounts fairly well for the quark mass dependence in the qcd equation of state near @xmath0 as delivered by selected lattice qcd results .
we emphasize further that lattice qcd calculations at imaginary chemical potential , avoiding the sign problem of the fermion determinant , give valuable information which can be continued to real chemical potential within our model .
the feasibility of exploring larger net baryon densities is relevant for future heavy - ion experiments at fair .
+ the work is supported by 06dr136 , gsi - fe , and eu i3hp .
999 m. bluhm , b. kmpfer , r. schulze , d. seipt , and u. heinz , phys .
c * 76 * , 034901 ( 2007 ) .
h. schade , and b. kmpfer , arxiv:0705.2003 .
a. peshier , b. kmpfer , o. p. pavlenko , and g. soff , phys .
b * 337 * , 235 ( 1994 ) .
a. peshier , b. kmpfer , o. p. pavlenko , and g. soff , phys .
d * 54 * , 2399 ( 1996 ) .
a. peshier , b. kmpfer , and g. soff , phys .
c * 61 * , 045203 ( 2000 ) .
a. peshier , b. kmpfer , and g. soff , phys .
d * 66 * , 094003 ( 2002 ) .
m. bluhm , b. kmpfer , and g. soff , phys .
b * 620 * , 131 ( 2005 ) .
m. bluhm , b. kmpfer , r. schulze , and d. seipt , eur .
j. c * 49 * , 205 ( 2007 ) .
r. d. pisarski , nucl .
a * 498 * , 423c ( 1989 ) .
f. karsch , lect .
notes phys .
* 583 * , 209 ( 2002 ) .
d. h. rischke , prog .
phys . * 52 * , 197 ( 2004 ) .
m. bluhm , and b. kmpfer , phys .
d * 77 * , 114016 ( 2008 ) .
m. bluhm , and b. kmpfer , phys .
d * 77 * , 034004 ( 2008 ) .
e. v. shuryak , prog .
. phys . * 53 * , 273 ( 2004 ) ; nucl .
a * 750 * , 64 ( 2005 ) .
m. gyulassy , and l. mclerran , nucl .
a * 750 * , 30 ( 2005 ) .
d. a. teaney , phys .
c * 68 * , 034913 ( 2003 ) ; nucl .
phys . a * 785 * , 44 ( 2007 ) .
f. karsch , k. redlich , and a. tawfik , eur .
j. c * 29 * , 549 ( 2003 ) .
m. cheng et al . , phys .
d * 77 * , 014511 ( 2008 ) . c. m. hung , and e. v. shuryak , phys .
lett . * 75 * , 4003 ( 1995 ) .
m. delia , and m .-
lombardo , phys .
d * 70 * , 074509 ( 2004 ) .
m. delia , f. di renzo , and m .-
lombardo , phys .
d * 76 * , 114509 ( 2007 ) . m. delia , and m .-
lombardo , phys .
d * 67 * , 014505 ( 2003 ) .
a. roberge , and n. weiss , nucl .
b * 275 * , 734 ( 1986 ) . | equation of state of interacting matter for dynamics relativistic heavy - ion collisions early universe compact stellar objects canonical potential @xmath1 depends on intensive quantities ( temperature chemical potentials parameters like quark masses flavor number color number for qcd theory of hadrons quarks gluons parameters fixed instructive to study impact on @xmath1 complexity qcd interest is @xmath1 near demarcation line @xmath6 of hadrons vs. quarks gluons region probed in heavy - ion collisions traversed in cosmic evolution to parameterize equation of state near @xmath0 quasiparticle model ( qpm ) @xcite adjusted to lattice qcd data model in expressions for net baryon density entropy density @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 +\epsilon_i_i.2 where @xmath11 pressure @xmath16 @xmath17 is volume calculated consistently with eqs .1 restrict attention one independent chemical potential @xmath18 @xmath19 dispersion relations quasiparticle excitations self - energies @xmath20 1-loop approximations nonzero quark masses @xcite @xmath21 @xmath22 quark sector rest masses @xmath23 true rest mass term @xmath24 artificial lattice mass term @xmath25 calculational purposes lattice @xmath26 interaction generates self - energy contributions @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 effective coupling strength parametrized @xmath33 @xmath34 2-loop_c @xmath35 approaches perturbative region large temperatures @xmath0 @xmath32 becomes large shift parameter @xmath36 regulates coupling below @xmath0 coupling changes behavior model resummed expression thermodynamic potential formal power expansion @xmath32 generates infinite series terms term proportional plasmon term beyond perturbative expansion scheme effective coupling @xmath32 repair shortcomings 1-loop parameterizations dispersion relations model contain critical point color - flavor locking effects equation state real imaginary chemical potential susceptibilities described @xcite qpm describe new aspect model chiral extrapolation equation state emphasize extrapolate lattice qcd results from imaginary @xmath18 to real @xmath18 focus on region @xmath37 interaction effects strong region strongly coupled quark - gluon plasma explored at rhic lhc fair qpm parametrization lattice qcd results for @xmath38 large quark masses @xmath39 @xmath40 presented in @xcite for scaled pressure @xmath41 @xmath42 qpm parameters read @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 for @xmath46 chiral extrapolation eq . neglecting dependence @xmath47 @xmath49 @xmath23 extrapolated results exhibited in left panel figure for @xmath50 and @xmath51 set @xcite lattice qcd results well reproduced changing pressure integration constant @xmath52 small pressure below @xmath0 @xmath53 in strikt chiral limit change dashed curve scale figure 1 important test @xcite suitability hydrodynamic eos interaction measure @xmath54 @xmath55 denotes energy densityright panel figure qpm physical quark masses @xmath50 @xmath51 reproduces lattice qcd data @xmath56 peak softest point qcd equation at @xmath57 larger temperatures interaction measure approaches zero temperature dependence coupling @xmath32 close to conformal limit @xmath58 @xmath59 qcd thermodynamics @xmath60 at nonzero chemical potential @xmath61 considered net quark number density @xmath62 reads qpm @xcite @xmath63 imaginary odd function in @xmath64 figure left qpm results @xmath65 compared with lattice qcd results @xcite pronounced bending @xmath66 close to @xmath67 onset first - order roberge - weiss transition reproduced test qpm at nonzero @xmath7 bending driven by increasing @xmath64 dependence quasiparticle dispersion relation @xmath68 close to @xmath69 temperatures @xmath70 independence @xmath71 function @xmath72 value @xmath2 independence follows eq @xmath68 independent of @xmath64phase boundary @xmath73 @xmath60 shown right panel figure imaginary real baryo - chemical potential @xmath74 accessible by analytic continuation estimate for @xmath73 solution partial differential equation maxwell s relation @xmath75 @xmath76 first roberge - weiss transition line cross at @xmath77 @xmath78 close to lattice qcd results @xmath79 @xmath80 phase diagram imaginary chemical potential sector dashed curves represent sections first roberge - weiss transition lines @xmath81 first - order transitions dotted curve shows first @xmath83 center symmetry line @xmath84 roberge - weiss periodicity implies sectors between @xmath85 @xmath86 copies sector @xmath88 @xmath89 subsector between @xmath90 @xmath89 first roberge - weiss transition line quasiparticle model dispersion relations for quarks gluons accounts for quark mass dependence in qcd equation near @xmath0 lattice qcd results lattice qcd calculations at imaginary chemical potential give valuable information real chemical potential exploring larger net baryon densities relevant for future heavy - ion experimentswork supported by 06dr136 gsi - fe i3hp bluhm kmpfer schulze. seipt. heinz phys . c * 76 * 034901 ( 2007 ) schade b kmpfer arxiv:0705.2003 peshier kmpfer pavlenko g. soff . b 337 235 ( 1994 ) soff d 54 2399 ( 1996 ) soff c 61 * 045203 ( 2000 ) soff phys d 66 * 094003 ( 2002 ) bluhm kmpfer soff phys . b 620 * 131 ( 2005 ) bluhm schulze d. seipt c * 49 * 205 ( 2007 ) pisarski 498 * 423c ( 1989 ) karsch phys . * 583 * 209 ( 2002 ) rischke phys . 52 * 197 ( 2004 ) bluhm b kmpfer phys . d * 77 114016 ( 2008 ) bluhm kmpfer phys d 77 * 034004 ( 2008 )shuryak . 53 273 ( 2004 ) nucl 750 64 ( 2005 ) gyulassy mclerran nucl 750 30 ( 2005 ) teaney phys . 68 034913 ( 2003 ) phys 785 44 ( 2007 ) karsch redlich tawfik c 29 549 ( 2003 ) cheng . d 77 * 014511 ( 2008 ) hung shuryak phys . 75 * 4003 ( 1995 ) delia lombardo phys . d 70 * 074509 ( 2004 ) delia di renzo lombardo phys d 76 114509 ( 2007 ) delia lombardo d 67 * 014505 ( 2003 ) roberge weiss nucl b 275 * 734 ( 1986 ) | 0.435581 | 3,058 | 1,546 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,696 | in this note , by making use of a hypergeometric series identity derived by guillera , i prove a ramanujan - type series for the catalan s constant .
the convergence rate of this central binomial series representation surpasses those of all known similar series , including a classical formula by ramanujan and a recent formula by lupas .
interestingly , this suggests that an apry - like irrationality proof could be found for this constant .
catalan s constant , hypergeometric series , central binomial sums , convergence acceleration 11y60 , 11m06 , 30b50 , 33f05 , 33c20 | catalan s constant , so named in honor to eugne c. catalan ( 1814 - 1894 ) , who first developed series and definite integrals representations for it , is a classical mathematical constant which may be defined as @xcite @xmath0 this constant is a special value of some important functions such as the dirichlet s beta function @xmath1 , namely @xmath2 , and the clausen s function @xmath3 , namely denotes the dilogarithm function , defined as @xmath4 for real values of @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and extended to @xmath7 , except for the cut @xmath8 , by analytic continuation . ]
@xmath9 and @xmath10 . for positive integer values of @xmath11
, we can trace an analogy between @xmath12 and @xmath13 , the riemann zeta function , since both @xmath14 and @xmath15 are rational multiples of @xmath16 and @xmath17 , respectively , whereas finite closed - form expressions for both @xmath18 and @xmath19 in terms of other basic constants are unknown @xcite .
however , the proof by apry ( 1978 ) that @xmath20 is irrational @xcite has created an ` asymmetry ' in that analogy because the irrationality of @xmath21 , though very suspected , remains unproven . for which @xmath22 is irrational , and that at least one of the seven numbers @xmath23 is irrational @xcite . ] from the point of view of numerical computation , catalan himself ( 1865 ) computed @xmath24 to @xmath25 decimal places @xcite . by making use of a technique from kummer , bresse ( 1867 )
computed it to @xmath26 decimals , a result that was improved to @xmath27 decimals by glaisher ( 1913 ) @xcite . with the advent of computers , @xmath24 has been computed to a large number of digits .
for instance , yee and chan ( 2009 ) computed it to @xmath28 billion decimals @xcite .
their computation employs two formulas , one of which is a central binomial formula due to ramanujan ( 1915 ) @xcite : , as nicely described in ref . @xcite . ]
@xmath29 on searching for similar rapidly converging series , lupas ( 2000 ) has found the following alternating series @xcite @xmath30 this series converges so fast that it has been implemented in _
_ mathematica__@xmath31 ( version @xmath32 ) for computing @xmath24 . on searching for new congruences modulo primes , z .- w .
sun ( 2011 ) has pointed out that the following central binomial series should converge to @xmath24 ( see conjecture a7 of ref .
@xcite ) : @xmath33 he indeed comments that this formula could be derived from a hypergeometric identity proved by guillera in a recent work @xcite , but a complete proof is not provided there in ref .
@xcite . here in this note ,
starting from a guillera s hypergeometric identity i prove a ramanujan - type series representation for catalan s constant similar to that in eq .
whose convergence rate surpasses that of all known central binomial series representations for this constant .
let us adopt the usual notation for the generalized hypergeometric series : @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the pochhammer symbol .
our main result makes use of the lemma below , which determines a special value for @xmath37 , a function that converges at @xmath38 whenever @xmath39 ( see , e.g. , eq . ( 2.2.1 ) of ref .
@xcite ) .
[ lem:3f2 ] @xmath40 we start from a well - known integral representation for generalized hypergeometric functions ( see , e.g. , eq . ( 1.2 ) of ref @xcite ) , namely @xmath41 valid whenever @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
it then follows that @xmath44 now , let us show that , for all @xmath45 , @xmath46 it is well - known that @xmath47 for all non - null values of @xmath48 for which the hypergeometric series at the left - hand side converges ( see eq .
( 1.5.10 ) of ref .
two sucessive applications of the euler transformation formula @xmath49 on eq .
lead us to @xmath50 and , after some algebra , @xmath51 this completes the proof of eq . .
from eqs . and , one has @xmath52 the trigonometric substitution @xmath53 reduces this integral to @xmath54 which can be solved in terms of the dilogarithm function @xmath55 as follows .
first , note that @xmath56 } + i \left [ \mathrm{li}_2{\left(-e^{i \theta}\right ) } - \mathrm{li}_2{\left(e^{i \theta}\right)}\right ] , \label{eq : primitiva}\ ] ] as can be easily checked by differentiating the right - hand side . then @xmath57 -\left\ { \lim_{a \rightarrow 0^{+}}{a \ , \ln{\!\left [ \frac{1-e^{(i a)}}{1+e^{(i a ) } } \right ] } } + i \left [ \mathrm{li}_2{(-1 ) } - \mathrm{li}_2{(1)}\right]\right\ } \nonumber \\ & = & \frac{\pi}{2 } \ , \ln{\!\left [ \frac{(1-i)^2}{2 } \right ] } + i \left[-2\,i \ , \mathrm{cl}_2{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)}\right ]
-\left\{0 + i \left ( -\frac{\pi^2}{12 } -\frac{\pi^2}{6}\right)\right\ } \nonumber \\ & = & \frac{\pi}{2 } \ ,
\ln{\!\left({-\,i}\right ) } + 2 \ , \mathrm{cl}_2{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right ) } + i \ , \frac{\pi^2}{4 } % \nonumber \\ \ : = \ : \frac{\pi}{2 } \ , \left(\ln{1 } -i\,\frac{\pi}{2}\right ) + 2\ , g + i \ , \frac{\pi^2}{4 } \nonumber \\ & = & 2 \ , g \ , , \label{eq:2g}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the special value of the clausen function in eq .
and the principal value of the logarithm function , with @xmath58 $ ] , were taken into account .
are proved computationally with _ _
mathematica__@xmath31 , one finds the integral formula @xmath59 .
our eqs . and
can then be viewed as a formal proof of this formula . ]
the substitution of this result in eq .
completes the proof .
@xmath60 we are now in a position to prove a rapidly converging central binomial formula for the catalan s constant , which is our main result .
[ teo : main ] @xmath61 let @xmath62}\ ] ] be a function of a real variable @xmath48 in the open interval @xmath63 .
then @xmath64 on the other hand , from guillera s third identity in ref .
@xcite , we know that @xmath65 for all values of @xmath48 for which this series converges .
therefore @xmath66 which implies that @xmath67 on substituting the result obtained in lemma [ lem:3f2 ] for @xmath68 , we find @xmath69 . from eq .
, one then has @xmath70 which completes the proof .
@xmath60 the convergence rate of the just proved central binomial series representation for @xmath71 is to be compared to that of other known similar series , including those in eqs . and .
this is done in details in the next section .
let us now check the convergence rate of each ramanujan - type series for @xmath24 mentioned in this work . by applying the stirling
s improved formula , namely @xmath72 which implies that @xmath73 we shall develop an order estimate of the @xmath74-th term for each series . we begin with ramanujan s series , given in eq . .
its @xmath74-th term is @xmath75 the more complex central binomial series by lupas , see eq .
, has an @xmath74-th term whose absolute value can be estimated as follows : @xmath76 for sufficiently large values of @xmath11 , this simplifies to @xmath77 this convergence rate is clearly slower than that of ramanujan s series , not to say the number of basic arithmetic operations needed to compute the @xmath74-th term , which is considerably larger in the lupas series .
( version @xmath32 ) for computing @xmath34 @xcite . ]
the convergence rate of the series we proved in our theorem [ teo : main ] can be estimated as follows .
the @xmath74-th term of our series is @xmath78 for sufficiently large values of @xmath11 , this can be approximated by @xmath79 the factor @xmath80 makes our series converges faster than both the ramanujan and lupas series . in table
[ tabela ] , below , we compare the error committed in approximating @xmath71 by the partial sum of the first @xmath81 terms corresponding to each central binomial series mentioned in this work .
it is clear from this table that our series is the one that yields the smallest absolute error .
the only competitive series is that conjectured by sun , see our eq . , but a direct comparison of its @xmath74-th term with that of the series in our theorem [ teo : main ] shows that it converges slower . therefore ,
even an eventual proof of sun s conjecture will not furnish a central binomial series faster than the one i am presenting here in this work .
thanks are due to mrs . marcia r. souza and mr .
bruno s. s. lima for checking computationally all hypergeometric series discussed in this work . 19
.deviations from @xmath71 of the partial sums obtained by adding the first @xmath81 terms of each central binomial series mentioned in the text . [ cols="<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] | catalan s constant named honor to eugne c catalan 1814 - 1894 developed series integrals classical mathematical constant defined as @xcite special value of functions dirichlet s beta function @xmath1 clausen s function @xmath3 dilogarithm defined as @xmath4 values @xmath5 @xmath6 extended to @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 positive integer values @xmath11 analogy between @xmath12 @xmath13 riemann zeta function @xmath14 @xmath15 rational multiples of @xmath16 @xmath17 finite closed - form expressions for @xmath18 @xmath19 unknown proof by apry 1978 @xmath20 irrational asymmetry analogy irrationality of @xmath21 unproven @xmath22 irrational one of seven numbers @xmath23 irrational catalan ( 1865 ) computed @xmath24 to @xmath25 decimal places bresse ( 1867 ) computed to @xmath26 decimals improved to @xmath27 decimals by glaisher ( 1913 ) computers @xmath24 computed to digitsyee and chan 2009 ) computed @xmath28 billion decimals @xcite computation employs two formulas one central binomial formula due to ramanujan ( 1915 ) described converging series lupas ( 2000 ) found alternating series @xcite @xmath30 converges fast implemented in mathematica__@xmath31 version @xmath32 ) for computing @xmath24 congruences sun ( 2011 ) central binomial series should converge to @xmath24 conjecture @xmath33 formula derived from hypergeometric identity by guillera complete proof not provided starting from guillera s hypergeometric identity prove ramanujan - type series representation for catalan s constant similar convergence rate surpasses known central binomial series representations adopt usual notation for generalized hypergeometric series : @xmath35 where @xmath36 is pochhammer symbol result lemma determines special value for @xmath37 function converges at @xmath38 whenever @xmath39 @xmath40 start from integral representation for generalized hypergeometric functions @xmath41 valid whenever @xmath42 and @xmath43 follows @xmath44 show @xmath45 @xmath46 known @xmath47 non - null values @xmath48 hypergeometric series left - hand side converges see eq . 1.5.10 ) applications euler transformation formula @xmath49 eq lead @xmath50 @xmath51 completes proof eq @xmath52 trigonometric substitution @xmath53 reduces integral to @xmath54 solved dilogarithm function @xmath55 note @xmath56 } + i \left \mathrm{li}_2{(\theta\right - ] \label{eq : primitiva} checked differentiating right - hand side@xmath57 -\left\rightarrow{+}}\left\frac{1-e{1+e{ )\right \left\mathrm{li}_2{(-1 )\mathrm{li}_2{(1)}\right\nonumber \frac{\pi}{2 }\left\frac{(1-i)^2}{2 }\right \left[-2\\mathrm{cl}_2{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right) - -\frac{\pi^2}{12 } -\frac{\pi^2}{6}\right) \nonumber \frac{\pi}{2 }\left({-\right ) + 2\mathrm{cl}_2{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right )\frac{\pi^2}{4 }\nonumber \frac{\pi}{2 }\left(\ln{1 }\frac{\pi}{2}\right ) + 2\frac{\pi^2}{4 } \nonumber = 2\label{eq:2g}\end{aligned} special value clausen function eqprincipal value logarithm function @xmath58 $ proved computationally with mathematica__@xmath31 finds integral formula @xmath59 eqs formal proof formula substitution result in eq . completes proof @xmath60 prove rapidly converging central binomial formula catalan s constant main result @xmath61 @xmath62} function real variable @xmath48 open interval @xmath63 @xmath64 guillera s third identity @xmath65 values @xmath48 series converges @xmath66 implies @xmath67 substituting result lemma:3f2 @xmath68 find @xmath69 eq @xmath70 completes proof @xmath60 convergence rate central binomial series @xmath71 compared other similar series eqs next section check convergence rate each ramanujan - type series @xmath24 applying stirling s improved formula @xmath72 implies @xmath73 develop order estimate @xmath74-th term each series begin with ramanujan s series eq . @xmath74-th term is @xmath75 complex central binomial series by lupas eq .@xmath74-th term value estimated @xmath76 large values @xmath11 simplifies to @xmath77 convergence rate slower than ramanujan s series number basic arithmetic operations compute @xmath74-th term larger in lupas series version @xmath32 ) computing @xmath34 @xcite convergence rate of series theorem estimated @xmath74-th term is @xmath78 large values @xmath11 approximated by @xmath79 factor @xmath80 series converges faster than ramanujan lupas series compare error approximating @xmath71 by partial sum first @xmath81 terms each central binomial series our series yields smallest absolute error competitive series conjectured by sun direct comparison @xmath74-th term series shows converges slower proof of sun s conjecture furnish central binomial series faster than thanks to mrs . marcia r. souza mr . bruno s. s. lima for checking hypergeometric series 19 .deviations from @xmath71 partial sums obtained by adding first @xmath81 terms of each central binomial series cols=" " | 0.350774 | 2,393 | 1,299 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,697 | an estimation of the sensitivity to measure @xmath0-@xmath1 oscillations with the atlas detector is given for the detector geometry of `` initial layout '' .
the @xmath2 reach is derived from unbinned maximum likelihood amplitude fits using @xmath0 events generated with a simplified monte carlo method . | the observed @xmath0 and @xmath1 particles are linear combinations of the two mass eigenstates with masses @xmath3 and @xmath4 and a mass difference of @xmath2 . transitions between the two flavor eigenstates are allowed due to non conservation of flavor in weak current interactions and will occur with a frequency proportional to @xmath5 .
together with the mass difference @xmath6 of the @xmath7 system , which has already been measured with high accuracy ( @xmath8@xcite ) , the measurement of @xmath2 is an important ingredient for the precise determination of the side @xmath9 of the ckm unitarity triangle .
the direct determination of @xmath10 and @xmath11 from @xmath12 and @xmath5 is hampered by hadronic uncertainties .
these uncertainties partially cancel in the ratio of mass differences @xmath13 using the experimentally - measured masses @xmath14 and a value for the factor @xmath15 , which can be computed in lattice qcd , the constraint from the ratio @xmath16 is more effective in limiting the position of the apex of the unitarity triangle than the value obtained by @xmath12 measurements alone .
+ @xmath0 oscillations have been observed recently at the fermilab tevatron collider . whereas the d collaboration is reporting a two - sided bound @xmath17 at 90% cl @xcite
, cdf presents the first measurement of the @xmath0-@xmath1 oscillation frequency finding a signal for @xmath18(stat ) @xmath19(sys ) at 95% cl @xcite .
both results are consistent with the prediction of the standard model for the upper bound of @xmath5 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xcite .
+ the work presented here gives an updated estimate for the @xmath2 sensitivity from the atlas experiment using monte carlo events of the @xmath0 hadronic channels @xmath22 and @xmath23 with @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
the following sections contain a brief discussion of the event selection , analysis cuts and the most important kinematic distributions of the @xmath0 candidates .
a detailed description of the generation , simulation , reconstruction and analysis software tools used for this study as well as a short characterization of the properties of the atlas inner detector layout is given in @xcite .
the atlas b - physics trigger with various strategies for b - trigger selections is described in @xcite .
in the offline analysis the @xmath0 meson is reconstructed from its decay products , applying kinematical cuts on tracks , kinematical and mass cuts on intermediate particles like @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
a vertex fit includes mass constraints and requires that the total momentum of the @xmath0 vertex points to the primary vertex and the momentum of the @xmath26 vertex points to the @xmath0 vertex . to improve the purity of the sample cuts on properties of the @xmath0 candidates like proper time , impact parameter , transverse momentum and mass cuts are imposed . for the @xmath22 channel figure [ massbs ]
shows the fitted invariant mass distribution @xmath28 with a mass resolution of @xmath29 = 42.5 mev ( single gauss fit ) .
invariant mass distribution normalized to @xmath30 .
the core of the distribution is fitted with a single gauss function.,width=245 ] the proper time of the reconstructed @xmath0 candidates is computed from the reconstructed transverse decay length @xmath31 , the @xmath0 mass and the @xmath0 transverse momentum @xmath32 .
parameterized with the sum of two gauss functions around the same mean value the widths of the two gaussians resulting from the fit are @xmath33 = ( 70.3@xmath343.9 ) fs for the core fraction of 54.7% and @xmath35 = ( 156.1@xmath346.8 ) fs for the rest of the tail part of the distribution . for @xmath0 from @xmath36
decays and fitted with the sum of two gauss functions around a common mean value.,width=245 ] the estimation of the maximum value of @xmath5 measurable with atlas is considering @xmath0 candidates from the @xmath37 and @xmath38 channels .
the detailed analysis is done for the @xmath22 channel , whereas numbers for the @xmath23 signal and @xmath39 exclusive background channels are estimated extrapolations .
more details on the event selection including cut values , kinematical resolutions , expected number of events for signal and background channels can be found in @xcite .
the probability density to observe an initial @xmath40 meson ( @xmath41 ) decaying at time @xmath42 after its creation as a @xmath43 meson is given by @xmath44 where @xmath45 , @xmath46 and @xmath47 .
+ for the unmixed case ( an initial @xmath40 meson decaying as a @xmath40 meson at time @xmath42 ) , the probability density is obtained by setting @xmath48 in eq .
[ oscpr ] .
+ experimental effects like the wrong tag fraction and the resolution of the reconstructed proper time of the @xmath0 modify the probability function .
exclusive oscillating background channels and non - oscillating combinatorial background are taken into account as fractions of the probability density called pdf@xmath49 .
+ the likelihood of the total sample is written as @xmath50 the index @xmath51 denotes the @xmath36 channel and @xmath52 the @xmath53 channel , @xmath54 is the total number of events of type @xmath55 , and @xmath56 .
see @xcite for detailed information on the building of the probability density functions .
a simplified monte carlo method is applied to generate a @xmath0 sample using the numbers of reconstructed @xmath0 events and kinematic distributions obtained from the simulation studies in ref . @xcite as input parameters .
@xmath0 signal events oscillating with a given frequency @xmath5(e.g .
@xmath57 , which is far off the expected value for @xmath5 ) , together with @xmath58 background events oscillating with frequency @xmath12 and @xmath59 combinatorial events ( no oscillations ) are generated according to eq .
[ oscpr ] .
the @xmath5 measurement limits are obtained applying the amplitude fit method @xcite to the ` data sample ' generated as described in the previous section . according to this method a new parameter , the @xmath0 oscillation amplitude @xmath60 ,
is introduced in the likelihood function by replacing the term ` @xmath61 ' with ` @xmath62 ' in the @xmath0 probability density function given in eq .
[ oscpr ] . for each value of @xmath5 ,
the new likelihood function is minimized with respect to @xmath60 , keeping all other parameters fixed , and a value @xmath63 is obtained .
one expects , within the estimated uncertainty , @xmath64 for @xmath5 close to its true value , and @xmath65 for @xmath5 far from the true value .
a @xmath66 measurement limit is defined as the value of @xmath5 for which @xmath67 , and a sensitivity at 95% confidence level as the value of @xmath5 for which @xmath68 .
limits are computed with the statistical uncertainty @xmath69 . a detailed investigation on the systematic uncertainties @xmath70 , which affects the measurement of the @xmath0 oscillation ,
is presented in @xcite .
+ for the nominal set of parameters ( as defined in the previous sections ) , @xmath71 and an integrated luminosity of 30 @xmath72 the amplitude @xmath73 is plotted as a function of @xmath5 in fig .
[ ampl_dms ] . the 95% cl sensitivity to measure @xmath5
is found to be 30.5 @xmath74 .
this value is given by the intersection of the dashed line , corresponding to @xmath75 with the @xmath64 horizontal line .
+ oscillation amplitude as a function of @xmath2 for an integrated luminosity of 30 @xmath72 for a specific monte carlo experiment.,width=226 ] from fig .
[ sign_dms ] , which shows the significance of the measurement @xmath76 as a function of @xmath5 , the @xmath77 measurement limit is found to be 22 @xmath74 . for an integrated luminosity of @xmath78.,width=226 ] .the dependence of @xmath2 measurement limits on the integrated luminosity . [ cols="^,^,^ " , ] the dependence of the @xmath5 measurement limits on the integrated luminosity is shown in fig .
[ dms_lum ] , with the numerical values given in table [ tab_dms_lum ] .
measurement limits on the integrated luminosity .
the dotted horizontal line gives the cdf measurement @xcite.,width=245 ] the dependence of the @xmath5 measurement limits on @xmath79 is determined for an integrated luminosity of 30 @xmath72 , other parameters having their nominal value .
the @xmath79 is used as a fixed parameter in the amplitude fit method . as shown in fig .
[ dms_dg ] no sizeable effect is seen up to a @xmath80 of 50% .
+ measurement limits on @xmath79.,width=245 ]
in this summary the performance of the @xmath81 channel and extrapolated numbers for @xmath23 channel are used to calculate the 95% cl exclusion and @xmath66 measurement limits of the @xmath82 oscillation frequency as a function of the integrated luminosity collected with the atlas detector .
the limits are updated for the detector geometry of `` initial layout '' using full rome statistics , but only statistical errors are taken into account . with an integrated luminosity from 10 to 20 @xmath72
a @xmath66 measurement for a range of @xmath83 is possible , covering the recent results from the tevatron collider .
+ the values obtained in this note for the measurement limits should be re - evaluated , taking into account changes in the detector geometry , especially `` complete detector layout '' , and the evolving simulation and reconstruction software . @xmath38 and
exclusive @xmath39background channels will be analyzed independently and investigations looking at the performance of other interesting @xmath0-@xmath1 mixing channels , which might be included in the analysis , will be carried out . 9 s. eidelman et al .
[ particle data group ] , `` review of particle physics '' , phys .
b592 , 1 , 2004 .
d0 collaboration , `` first direct two - sided bound on the @xmath0 oscillation frequency '' , physical review letters 97 , 021802 , 2006 .
cdf collaboration , `` measurement of the @xmath0 - @xmath1 oscillation frequency '' , physical review letters 97 , 062003 , 2006 . m. battaglia , a. buras , p. gambino and a. stocchi , `` workshop on the ckm matrix and the unitarity triangle '' , hep - ph/0304132 and cern-2003 - 002 , 2003 .
b. epp , e. kneringer , h. duer , p. jussel , `` performance of the @xmath84 channel with the atlas detector and prospects for the measurement of @xmath82 oscillations using rome mc simulation '' , atl - phys - pub-2006 - 020 , 2006 . | observed @xmath0 particles linear combinations mass eigenstates @xmath3 mass difference @xmath2 transitions between eigenstates allowed due to non conservation flavor weak current interactions frequency proportional to @xmath5 mass difference @xmath6 system measured measurement @xmath2 important for determination side ckm unitarity triangle determination of @xmath10 from @xmath12 hampered by hadronic uncertainties uncertainties cancel ratio mass differences measured masses value factor @xmath15 constraint ratio @xmath16 position apex unitarity triangle than @xmath12 measurements @xmath0 oscillations observed at fermilab tevatron collider two - sided bound @xmath17 at 90% cl @xcite cdf first measurement @xmath0-@xmath1 oscillation frequency signal @xmath18 @xmath19(sys at 95% cl @xcite results consistent with prediction standard model upper bound of @xmath5 @xcite updated estimate for @xmath2 sensitivity from atlas experiment using monte carlo events @xmath0 hadronic channels @xmath22 with @xmath24 @xmath25sections contain event selection analysis cuts kinematic distributions @xmath0 candidates detailed description generation simulation reconstruction analysis software tools atlas inner detector layout in @xcite atlas b - trigger strategies described @xcite offline analysis @xmath0 meson reconstructed from decay products kinematical cuts on tracks mass intermediate particles @xmath26 @xmath27 vertex fit includes mass constraints requires momentum @xmath0 vertex primary @xmath26 purity cuts properties proper time impact parameter transverse momentum mass cuts imposed @xmath22 channel figure shows invariant mass distribution @xmath28 mass resolution @xmath29 = 42.5 mev single gauss fit invariant mass distribution normalized to @xmath30 core fitted single gauss function proper time reconstructed @xmath0 candidates computed from transverse decay length @xmath31 mass transverse momentum @xmath32 parameterized gauss functions widths gaussians are @xmath33 = ( 70.3@xmath343.9 ) fs for core fraction 54.7% @xmath35 = ( 156.1@xmath346.8 ) fs tail part@xmath0 from @xmath36 decays two gauss functions common mean value estimation maximum value @xmath5 @xmath0 candidates @xmath37 channels detailed analysis @xmath22 channel @xmath23 @xmath39 background channels estimated extrapolations details event selection cut values kinematical resolutions expected number events in @xcite probability density initial @xmath40 meson decaying @xmath42 @xmath43 meson by @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 unmixed case initial @xmath40 meson decaying @xmath40 meson @xmath42 probability density setting @xmath48 in eq experimental effects wrong tag fraction resolution reconstructed time @xmath0 modify probability oscillating background channels non - oscillating combinatorial background fractions probability density@xmath49 likelihood total sample written as @xmath50 index @xmath51 @xmath36 channel @xmath52 @xmath53 channel @xmath54 total number events @xmath55 @xmath56 @xcite probability density functions simplified monte carlo method @xmath0 sample using reconstructed @xmath0 events kinematic distributions simulation studies@xmath0 signal events oscillating frequency @xmath5 far off expected value @xmath58 background events @xmath12 @xmath59 combinatorial events no oscillations generated eq . @xmath5 measurement limits obtained amplitude fit method @xcite data sample new parameter @xmath0 oscillation amplitude @xmath60 introduced replacing @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath0 probability density function. each value @xmath5 new likelihood function minimized @xmath60 other parameters fixed value @xmath63 obtained expects uncertainty @xmath64 @xmath5 close true value @xmath65 @xmath5 far from true value @xmath66 measurement limit defined value @xmath5 95% confidence level value @xmath5 @xmath68 limits computed statistical uncertainty @xmath69 detailed investigation systematic uncertainties @xmath70 measurement @xmath0 oscillation presented @xcite nominal set parameters @xmath71 integrated luminosity 30 @xmath72 amplitude @xmath73 plotted function @xmath5 fig . [ ampl_dms ]95% cl sensitivity @xmath5 30.5 @xmath74 by intersection dashed line @xmath75 with @xmath64 horizontal line oscillation amplitude function of @xmath2 integrated luminosity 30 @xmath72 monte carlo experiment fig . @xmath76 function @xmath5 @xmath77 measurement limit 22 @xmath74 integrated luminosity @xmath78 dependence of @xmath2 measurement limits on integrated luminosity dependence @xmath5 measurement limits integrated luminosity shown in fig . numerical values table dotted horizontal line cdf measurement dependence @xmath5 measurement limits on @xmath79 for integrated luminosity 30 @xmath72 other parameters nominal value @xmath79 fixed parameter in amplitude fit method no sizeable effect up to @xmath80 of 50% measurement limits on @xmath79 performance of @xmath81 channel extrapolated numbers @xmath23 channel calculate 95% cl exclusion @xmath66 measurement limits @xmath82 oscillation frequency function integrated luminosity atlas detector limits updated for detector geometry using full rome statistics statistical errorsintegrated luminosity 10 to 20 @xmath72 @xmath66 measurement range @xmath83 possible results tevatron collider values measurement limits - evaluated changes detector geometry layout evolving simulation reconstruction software @xmath38 @xmath39background channels analyzed independently investigations performance @xmath0-@xmath1 mixing channels eidelman particle data group review particle physics phys . b592 , 2004 d0 collaboration @xmath0 oscillation frequency physical review letters 97 021802 2006 cdf collaboration measurement @xmath0 - @xmath1 oscillation frequency letters 97 062003 2006 battaglia buras gambino stocchi workshop ckm matrix unitarity triangle hep - ph/0304132 cern-2003 - 002 2003 epp kneringer duer jussel performance @xmath84 channel atlas detector measurement @xmath82 oscillations rome mc simulation atl - phys - pub-2006 - 020 2006 | 0.353457 | 2,606 | 1,358 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,705 | the @xmath0 ratios and absorption line - strengths of distant cluster galaxies can be used to directly study their stellar populations , determine their redshift of formation , their scatter in ages , and any dependence of their ages on such internal properties such as velocity dispersion or mass . comparing the zero - point the fundamental plane in the @xmath1 cluster cl1358 + 62 to that in coma , we conclude that the redshift of formation for the stars in massive cluster e / s0s was @xmath2 . the fundamental plane in cl1358 + 62
has the following form : @xmath3 , indicating that the last epoch of star - formation has very little dependence on galaxy mass .
the scatter in the cl1358 + 62 fundamental plane is also very low , equivalent to a scatter in ages of @xmath4.we have also analyzed the @xmath5 ratios of galaxies of type s0/a and later .
these early - type spirals follow a different plane from the e and s0 galaxies , with a scatter that is twice as large as the scatter for the e / s0s
. these residuals also correlate with the residuals from the color - magnitude relation .
preliminary analysis of the absorption line - strengths of the cl1358 + 62 early - types indicate that they are well - described by uniformly old , single - burst stellar populations with metallicity varying as a function of velocity dispersion .
# 1#2 | the fundamental plane ( fp ) is an empirical relation between galaxy half - light radius , @xmath6 , surface brightness , @xmath7 , and central velocity dispersion , @xmath8 for early - type galaxies .
locally , @xmath9 in gunn @xmath10 ( jrgensen 1996 ) . under the assumption of homology , this implies @xmath11 .
the fundamental plane is very thin , with an scatter of @xmath12 in coma in @xmath5 ratio for a given galaxy mass , @xmath13 ( jrgensen 1993 ) . with its low scatter ,
the fp is a very powerful tool for measuring the evolution of galaxy @xmath0 ratios as a function of redshift , @xmath13 , etc . because reasonable stellar populations evolve as @xmath14 ( tinsley & gunn 1976 ) , evolution in the properties of the fundamental plane directly probe the star - formation histories of cluster galaxies .
measurements of the evolution of the fp zero - point , scatter , and slope can be used to constrain the mean epoch of star - formation , the spread in early - type galaxy ages ; and the dependence of galaxy age on , e.g. , @xmath13 .
we exploit high resolution keck spectroscopy for velocity dispersions and line strengths , and wfpc2 imaging for the structural parameters , colors , and morphologies .
details can be found in kelson ( 1999abc ) .
the left - hand panel of figure 1 shows the tight fundamental plane relation in the @xmath1 cluster cl1358 + 62 .
the 30 e / s0s in this sample are fit by the following plane in johnson @xmath15 ( kelson 1999c ) : @xmath16 this sample has comparable depth to the fp samples of coma , ensuring that the comparison of these fp exponents with those determined in nearby clusters is reasonably free from selection effects .
we draw the following three conclusions : @xmath17 mild evolution in the fp zero - point , of @xmath18 ( @xmath19 ) , indicates a mean redshift of formation of @xmath20 for the stars in cluster e / s0s .
@xmath17 the scatter in the color - magnitude relation and fp suggest a 1-@xmath8 scatter in ages of 15% . for @xmath21 and @xmath22
, @xmath23-@xmath8 is equivalent to @xmath24 . @xmath17 no evolution in the fp slope
is seen , indicating that the mean luminosity weighted ages of the stellar populations do not depend significantly on @xmath8 or @xmath13 : @xmath25
our sample contains many galaxies of type s0/a through sb .
these early - type spirals are shown with the e / s0s in the right - hand panel of figure 1 .
the spirals show large scatter about the fp and have systematically higher surface brightnesses for a given @xmath8 and @xmath6 .
the scatter for the early - type spirals is twice as large as that for the e / s0s . for the spirals ,
the fp residuals correlate strongly with residual from the color - magnitude relation ( see kelson 1999c ) . correcting the surface brightnesses of the spirals for their young stellar populations using their residuals from the color - magnitude relation ,
one obtains a new plane for the spirals which follows that of the e / s0s .
we conclude that after several gyr , these spirals , including the low - mass e+as , may evolve into present - day , low - mass s0s and appear in nearby fp samples .
the cl1358 + 62 spectra are of sufficiently high @xmath26 that one can accurately measure absorption line strengths , and use stellar population synthesis models , such as those of vazdekis ( 1996 ) , to constrain the systematic variation of the stellar populations along the fp and color - magnitude relations . in figure 2
, we show that the sequence of e / s0 galaxies in cl1358 + 62 is defined by a tight correlation between c@xmath274668 and restframe @xmath28 color .
the best - fit slope of the correlation is nearly identical to that predicted for a sequence of single - burst stellar population models of constant age , in which only metallicity varies . even with these preliminary measurements ,
this conclusion is reinforced by the correlations of the metal - sensitive c@xmath274668index with the high - order balmer lines . in the first panel of figure 3 ,
the c@xmath274668 index is shown to systematically correlate with the h@xmath29 index in a manner which is also consistent with the line of constant age .
the scatter in these two diagrams is consistent with the small scatter in ages that has been estimated using the fp and color - magnitude relations ( kelson 1999c , van dokkum 1998 ) .
the latter two panels show the correlations of c@xmath274668 and h@xmath29 with central velocity dispersion , indicating that metallicity is strongly correlated with the depth of the galaxy potential .
the solid lines are the best - fit slopes , with the @xmath30-@xmath8 uncertainties indicated by dotted lines . using the vazdekis ( 1996 ) models , these correlations with velocity dispersion imply @xmath31 .
preliminary analysis using monte carlo simulations of real data ( kelson 1999 ) indicate that this correlation can produce an observed fp of the approximate form : @xmath32 , though the precise shape depends on sample selection criteria , and the underlying distribution of bulge - to - disk ratios .
we have found that the slope of the fundamental plane has remained constant with redshift .
together with the absorption line strengths and restframe colors , these data suggest that early - type galaxies in clusters have very uniform stellar population ages , and chemical abundances which are strongly determined by the depths of their potential wells , assuming that the stellar populations of cluster e / s0s can be adequately modeled by simple single - burst models .
the implied correlation of metallicity with @xmath8 appears to be the physical basis behind both the color - magnitude relation and the fundamental plane , though further work is required to fully understand the nature of the selection biases and other systematic effects .
jrgensen i. , franx m. , & kjrgaard p. 1993
, , 411 , 34 jrgensen i. , franx m. , & kjrgaard p. 1996
, , 280 , 167 kelson , d.d . , 1999a , , submitted kelson , d.d . , 1999b , , in press kelson , d.d . , 1999c , , in press kelson , d.d .
1999 , in preparation tinsley , b.m . &
gunn , j.e .
1976 , apj , 203 , 52 van dokkum , p.g . , 1998 , , 500 , 714 vazdekis , a. , 1996 , , 107 , 306 worthey , g. & ottavianni , d.l . 1997 , , | fundamental plane galaxy half - light radius surface brightness central velocity dispersion @xmath8 early - type galaxies @xmath9 @xmath10 1996 implies @xmath11 fundamental plane thin scatter @xmath12 @xmath5 ratio galaxy mass @xmath13 jrgensen 1993 ) low scatter fp powerful measuring evolution galaxy @xmath0 ratios redshift @xmath13 stellar populations evolve as @xmath14 1976 probe star - formation histories cluster galaxies measurements evolution fp zero - point scatter slope constrain mean epoch star - formation spread early - type galaxy ages galaxy age on @xmath13 high resolution keck spectroscopy for velocity dispersions line strengths wfpc2 imaging for structural parameters colors morphologies details in kelson ( 1999abc ) figure 1 tight fundamental plane relation in @xmath1 cluster cl1358 + 62 30 e / s0s fit by plane johnson @xmath15 @xmath16 sample comparable depth to fp samples coma comparison nearby clusters free from selection effectsthree conclusions @xmath17 mild evolution fp zero - point @xmath18 indicates redshift formation @xmath20 cluster e / s0s @xmath17 scatter color - magnitude relation fp suggest 1-@xmath8 scatter ages 15% @xmath21 @xmath23-@xmath8 equivalent to @xmath24 @xmath17 no evolution fp slope mean luminosity weighted ages stellar depend on @xmath8 or @xmath13 @xmath25 sample contains galaxies type s0/a through sb early - type spirals shown e / s0s figure 1 spirals show large scatter fp higher surface brightnesses @xmath8 @xmath6 scatter twice large e / s0s fp residuals correlate with color - magnitude relation correcting surface brightnesses populations obtains new plane follows e / s0s after several gyr spirals low - may evolve into present - day low - mass s0s nearby fp samples cl1358 + 62 spectra high @xmath26 measure absorption line strengths stellar population synthesis models constrain systematic variation stellar populations along fp color - magnitude relationsfigure 2 sequence e / s0 galaxies in cl1358 + 62 defined correlation c@xmath274668 @xmath28 color best - fit slope identical to single - burst stellar population models constant age metallicity varies reinforced by correlations metal - sensitive c@xmath274668index with high - order balmer lines first panel figure 3 c@xmath274668 index with h@xmath29 index consistent with line constant age scatter consistent with small scatter ages estimated using fp color - magnitude relations kelson 1998 panels correlations of c@xmath274668 h@xmath29 with central velocity dispersion metallicity with depth galaxy potential solid lines best - fit slopes @xmath30-@xmath8 uncertainties by dotted lines vazdekis 1996 models correlations with velocity dispersion imply @xmath31 analysis correlation produce observed fp form : @xmath32 shape depends on sample selection bulge - to - disk ratios slope fundamental plane constant with redshiftabsorption line strengths restframe colors data suggest early - type galaxies in clusters uniform stellar population ages chemical abundances determined by depths potential wells stellar populations cluster e / s0s modeled by single - burst models correlation of metallicity with @xmath8 basis color - magnitude relation fundamental plane further work understand selection biases systematic effects jrgensen. franx m. kjrgaard p. 1993 411 , 34 1996 280 , 167 kelson d 1999a 1999b 1999c preparation tinsley , b.m gunn , j.e. 1976 203 , 52 dokkum 1998 500 , 714 vazdekis 1996 107 , 306 worthey ottavianni .l 1997 | 0.263788 | 1,560 | 808 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,706 | i show that if a geodesic space has curvature bounded below locally in the sense of alexandrov then its completion has the same lower curvature bound globally . | let us recall few definitions . * a _ geodesic space _ is a metric space such that any two points can be connected by a minimizing geodesic . *
a _ length space _ is a metric space such that any two points can be connected by a curve with length arbitrary close to the distance between the points . *
a complete length space is an _ alexandrov space with curvature @xmath0 _ if for any quadruple @xmath1 the _ ( 1 + 3)-point comparison _ holds ; i.e. , if @xmath2 or at least one of the model angles @xmath3 is not defined .
_ let @xmath4 be a geodesic space .
assume that for any point @xmath5 there is a neighborhood @xmath6 such that the @xmath7-comparison holds for any quadruple of points in @xmath8 .
then the completion of @xmath4 is an alexandrov space with curvature @xmath0 . _
the question was asked by victor schroeder around 2009 .
later i learned from stephanie alexander , that this statement has an application .
i want to thank stephanie alexander , richard bishop , urs lang , nan li , victor schroeder for the interesting discussions .
a special thanks to alexander lytchak for correcting few mistakes and suggesting an easier proof of lemma [ lem : xyz ] via his favorite ultrapower . in section [ sec :
start ] i give a reformulation of the above theorem , which will be proved in section [ sec : end ] after auxiliary statements proved in section [ sec : prelim ] .
the distance between points @xmath9 and @xmath10 in a metric space will be denoted as @xmath11 .
a geodesic from @xmath9 to @xmath10 will be denoted as @xmath12 $ ] , once we write @xmath12 $ ] we implicitly make a choice of one such geodesic .
also we use the following short - cut notation : @xmath13 x y \r]&=[xy]\backslash\{x\ } , & \l ] x y \r[&=[xy]\backslash\{x , y\ } , & \l [ xy \r[&=[xy]\backslash\{y\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we denote by @xmath14 the model @xmath7-plane and @xmath15 ( so @xmath16 if @xmath17 and @xmath18 otherwise ) .
assume @xmath19 $ ] and @xmath20 $ ] be two geodesics in @xmath4 and @xmath21px\r]$ ] and @xmath22py\r]$ ] . since @xmath7-comparison holds in a neighborhood of @xmath23
the function @xmath24 is nonincreasing in both variables for sufficiently small values of the variables .
it follows that angle @xmath25px\r],\bar y\in \l]py\r],\dist{p}{\bar x}{}\to 0,\dist{p}{\bar y}{}\to 0}\ ] ] is defined for any hinge @xmath26,[py])$ ] in @xmath4 . the same way as for alexandrov space
, one can show that @xmath27 for any three hinges formed by geodesics @xmath19 $ ] , @xmath20 $ ] and @xmath28 $ ] .
it follows that , if @xmath29xy\r[$ ] then @xmath30 to prove the theorem , it is sufficient to show that for any @xmath31 , any point @xmath23 and any geodesics @xmath32 $ ] in @xmath4 we have @xmath33 if @xmath34qs\r]$ ] and @xmath35 is small enough .
indeed , once it is proved , it follows that the inequality [ ( * ) ] holds for all @xmath34qs\r]$ ] .
together with [ bigstar ] , it implies that the ( 1 + 3)-point comparison for all quadruples in @xmath4 ; this can be done exactly the same way as in alexandrov space , see @xcite .
hence the completion @xmath36 of @xmath4 is an alexandrov space with curvature @xmath37 for any @xmath31 . from the standard globalization theorem ( as it is stated in @xcite )
we get the result .
as above we denote by @xmath36 the completion of @xmath4 . note that any point @xmath5 admits an open neighborhood @xmath8 in @xmath36 such that @xmath7-comparison holds for any quadruple of points in @xmath8 .
in particular the following condition holds for any point @xmath38 and geodesic @xmath32 $ ] which lie in @xmath39 .
@xmath40 where @xmath34qs\r]$ ] .
an open domain @xmath8 in @xmath36 which satisfy [ ( * * ) ] will be called a _
@xmath7-domain_. note that to prove that @xmath8 is a @xmath7-domain , it is sufficient to check that [ ( * * ) ] holds only if @xmath41 is sufficiently small .
i.e. , if for any point @xmath23 and geodesic @xmath32 $ ] in @xmath39 , the condition [ ( * * ) ] holds if @xmath41 is small enough then [ ( * * ) ] holds for all @xmath42qs\right]$ ] .
note also that if @xmath43 is a @xmath7-domain in @xmath36 then @xmath7-comparison holds for any quadruple of points in @xmath44 .
the later is proved exactly the same way as in alexandrov space : for a quadruple @xmath45 we choose a geodesic @xmath19 $ ] and apply [ bigstar ] together with [ ( * * ) ] for @xmath21px\r[$ ] such that @xmath46 .
( everything works since geodesics with ends in @xmath44 can not leave @xmath43 . ) in particular , if @xmath8 is a @xmath7-domain in @xmath36 then the curvature at each point of @xmath8 is @xmath0 .
therefore any local construction in alexandrov geometry can be performed inside of @xmath8 .
for example , we can construct so called _ radial curves _ as far as we do not get out of @xmath8 .
the radial curves are formed by trajectories which try to escape from a given point @xmath47 using the greedy algorithm ; these curves parametrized in a special way which makes them behave as geodesics in terms of comparisons .
the following proposition is a local version of _ radial monotonicity _ in @xcite and can be proved exactly the same way .
proposition[prop : rad - loc ] let @xmath48 be a @xmath7-domain and @xmath49 .
assume that @xmath50\subset \omega$ ] and @xmath51 then there is a radial curve @xmath52\to \omega$ ] with respect to @xmath47 such that @xmath53 and the distance @xmath54 satisfies the radial monotonicity for any point @xmath23 in @xmath8 .
i.e. , if @xmath55 $ ] is a triangle in @xmath56 $ ] with sides @xmath57 then the function @xmath58 is a nonincreasing in its domain of definition .
the proposition above is used to prove the following lemma .
key lemma[lem : key ] let @xmath59 and @xmath60 be two @xmath7-domains in @xmath36 .
let @xmath61 consider a triangle @xmath62 $ ] in @xmath14 such that @xmath63 set @xmath64 to be the distance from the side @xmath65 $ ] to @xmath66 .
assume @xmath67 and @xmath50\subset \omega_p\cap\omega_q$ ] .
then @xmath68 note that if @xmath69 , then the lemma follows from the triangle inequality ; further we assume @xmath70 .
let @xmath71 $ ] be a point which minimize the distance to @xmath66 ; so @xmath72 .
fix small @xmath73 ; any value @xmath74 will do .
choose @xmath75wp\r]$ ] and @xmath76wq\r]$ ] so that @xmath77 note that geodesic @xmath78 $ ] lies in @xmath79 $ ] .
by alexandrov s lemma ( stated as in @xcite ) , one can choose a point @xmath80 $ ] so that @xmath81 r50 mm pics / key - lemma(0.7 ) set @xmath82 .
consider the radial curve @xmath83\to \omega$ ] with respect to @xmath47 such that @xmath84 .
set @xmath85 . by proposition [ prop : rad - loc ] , we have @xmath86 hence key lemma follows .
lemma[lem : good+good ] let @xmath59 and @xmath60 be two @xmath7-domains in @xmath36 .
let @xmath87 , @xmath88 and @xmath89\subset x\cap(\omega_p\cup\omega_q)$ ] .
then for any geodesic @xmath32\subset \omega_q\cap x$ ] the condition [ ( * * ) ] holds if @xmath41 is sufficiently small .
choose @xmath90\cap\omega_p\cap\omega_q$ ] .
since @xmath60 is a @xmath7-domain , we have @xmath91 for @xmath34qs\r]$ ] .
therefore @xmath92 note that for small values of @xmath41 , we can apply key lemma ; hence the result .
corollary[cor : good+good ] let @xmath93 and @xmath94 be two @xmath7-domains in @xmath36 .
assume @xmath95 is an open set such that for any two points @xmath96 any geodesic @xmath12 $ ] lies in @xmath97 .
then @xmath98 is a @xmath7-domain .
the following lemma makes possible to produce triple of the domains @xmath93 , @xmath94 and @xmath98 as in the corollary above .
lemma[lem : xyz ] let @xmath89 $ ] be a geodesic in @xmath4 and the points @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath99 appear on @xmath100pq\r[$ ] in the same order .
assume that there are @xmath7-domains @xmath101 $ ] and @xmath102 $ ] in @xmath36 .
then there is an open set @xmath103 which contains @xmath104 $ ] and such that for any two points @xmath105 any geodesic @xmath106 $ ] lies in @xmath97 . in particular , by corollary [ cor : good+good ] , @xmath98 is a @xmath7-domain .
before the proof starts , let us discuss ultralimits of metric spaces briefly ; see @xcite for more details .
fix a nonprinciple ultrafilter @xmath107 on the natural numbers .
denote by @xmath108 the @xmath107-power of @xmath36 .
the space @xmath36 will be considered as a subspace of @xmath108 in the natural way .
given a point @xmath109 , we will denote by @xmath110 and @xmath111 the @xmath112-ball centered at @xmath23 in @xmath36 and in @xmath108 correspondingly . in is straightforward to check the following [ clm : k - domain^o ] if @xmath110 is a @xmath7-domain then so is @xmath111 .
arguing by contradiction , assume that there is a sequence of geodesics @xmath113 $ ] such that @xmath114 $ ] , @xmath115 $ ] and @xmath113\not\subset\omega_1\cup\omega_2 $ ] for each @xmath116 .
the @xmath107-limit of @xmath113 $ ] is a geodesic in @xmath108 from @xmath117 to @xmath118 which does not lie in @xmath89 $ ] .
i.e. , geodesics in @xmath108 bifurcate at some point , say @xmath119 $ ] . according to [ clm : k - domain^o ] , if @xmath120 is small enough , the ball @xmath121 forms a @xmath7-domain , a contradiction .
note that one can split the geodesic @xmath89 $ ] into segments in such a way that each segment lies in a @xmath7-domain .
more precisely , there is a sequence of points @xmath122 on @xmath89 $ ] such that the sequence @xmath123 is increasing and each geodesic @xmath124 $ ] lies in a @xmath7-domain . given @xmath120 , the sequence above can be chosen in such a way that in addition @xmath125 . applying lemma [ lem : xyz ] few times , we get that the segment @xmath126 $ ] belongs to one @xmath7-domain . applying key lemma ( [ lem : key ] ) to three points @xmath127 and @xmath34qs\r]$ ] with small enough @xmath41
, we get that [ ( * ) ] holds for @xmath128 , @xmath32 $ ] and @xmath129 . finally since
@xmath130 can be made arbitrary small , the triangle inequality implies that [ ( * ) ] holds for @xmath23 , @xmath32 $ ] and arbitrary @xmath31 .
an alternative proof of the key lemma can be build on the so called _ cat s cradle construction _ from @xcite . this way you do not have to learn who are the radial curves and what is radial monotonicity .
if you were able to do everything as suggested , you should get a weaker version of key lemma . namely you prove the required estimate if @xmath64 is bigger than bisector of @xmath62 $ ] at @xmath66 .
this is good enough for the rest of the proof . playing a bit with the construction , namely making @xmath112
depend on @xmath116 , you can actually get the key lemma in full generality . | recall definitions geodesic space metric two points connected by minimizing geodesic length space metric points connected by curve length close to distance complete length space alexandrov space with curvature @xmath0 if quadruple @xmath1 ( 1 + 3)-point comparison holds @xmath2 or model @xmath3 not defined @xmath4 geodesic space point @xmath5 neighborhood @xmath6 @xmath7-comparison holds for quadruple points in @xmath8 completion of @xmath4 is alexandrov space with curvature @xmath0 question asked by victor schroeder 2009 learned stephanie alexander statement has application thank stephanie alexander richard bishop urs lang nan li victor schroeder discussions thanks to alexander lytchak correcting mistakes proof of lemma via ultrapower section start reformulation of theorem proved in section end after distance between points @xmath9 and @xmath10 metric space denoted as @xmath11 geodesic from @xmath9 to @xmath10 denoted as @xmath12 choice of one geodesicuse short - notation @xmath13 x y =[xy]\backslash{x y[xy]\backslash[xy{aligned denote @xmath14 model @xmath7-plane @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 assume @xmath19 @xmath20 $ two geodesics in @xmath4 @xmath21px\r$ @xmath22py\r$ @xmath7-comparison holds neighborhood @xmath23 function @xmath24 nonincreasing variables small values angle @xmath25px\r], y]py{p} x 0 y defined for hinge @xmath26,[py]$ ] @xmath4 alexandrov space show @xmath27 three hinges formed geodesics @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath28 $ @xmath29xy\r[$ ] @xmath30 prove theorem sufficient show @xmath31 point @xmath23 geodesics @xmath32 $ @xmath4 @xmath33 @xmath34qs\r]$ @xmath35 small enough proved inequality [ ( * ) ] holds for all @xmath34qs\r]$ ]bigstar implies ( 1 + 3)-point comparison quadruples @xmath4 alexandrov space completion @xmath36 of @xmath4 alexandrov space with curvature @xmath37 @xmath31 standard globalization theorem result @xmath36 completion @xmath4 point @xmath5 admits open neighborhood @xmath8 in @xmath36 @xmath7-comparison holds quadruple points @xmath8 condition holds point @xmath38 geodesic @xmath32 in @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath34qs open domain @xmath8 in @xmath36 [ ( * * ) ] @xmath7-domain prove @xmath8 @xmath7-domain check [ ( * * ) ] holds if @xmath41 small point @xmath23 geodesic @xmath32 @xmath39 condition holds @xmath41 small holds all @xmath42qs @xmath43 @xmath7-domain in @xmath36 @xmath7-comparison holds quadruple of points in @xmath44 alexandrov space quadruple @xmath45 choose geodesic @xmath19 $ apply [ bigstar ] [ ( * * ) ] for @xmath21px\r @xmath46geodesics ends in @xmath44 leave @xmath43 if @xmath8 @xmath7-domain in @xmath36 curvature at each point is @xmath0 local construction alexandrov geometry inside @xmath8 construct radial curves @xmath8 formed by trajectories from point @xmath47 algorithm curves behave as geodesics proposition local version of radial monotonicity in @xcite proved @xmath48 @xmath7-domain and @xmath49 @xmath50\subset \omega and @xmath51 radial curve @xmath52\to \omega @xmath47 @xmath53 distance @xmath54 satisfies radial monotonicity for point @xmath23 in @xmath8 if @xmath55 triangle in @xmath56 sides @xmath57 function @xmath58 nonincreasing in domain definition proposition lemma @xmath59 and @xmath60 @xmath7-domains in @xmath36 @xmath61 triangle @xmath62 in @xmath14 @xmath63 set @xmath64 distance from side @xmath65 to @xmath66 assume @xmath67 and @xmath50\subset \omega_p\cap\omega_q$@xmath68 @xmath69 lemma follows from triangle inequality assume @xmath70 @xmath71 point minimize distance to @xmath66 @xmath72 fix small @xmath73 value @xmath74 choose @xmath75wp @xmath76wq\r @xmath77 geodesic @xmath78 in @xmath79 $ alexandrov s lemma choose point @xmath80 $ @xmath81 r50 mm set @xmath82 radial curve @xmath83\omega$ @xmath47 @xmath84 set @xmath85 @xmath86 key lemma follows @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath7-domains in @xmath36 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89\subset x\cap(\omega_p\omega_q)$ geodesic @xmath32\subset \omega_q condition holds if @xmath41 small choose @xmath90\cap\omega_p\omega_q$ @xmath60 @xmath7-domain @xmath91 for @xmath34qs\r$ @xmath92 small values of @xmath41 apply key lemma result @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath7-domains in @xmath36assume @xmath95 open set two points @xmath96 geodesic @xmath12 $ lies in @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath7-domain lemma triple domains @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath98 corollary lemma @xmath89 geodesic in @xmath4 points @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath99 appear on @xmath100pq same order @xmath7-domains @xmath101 @xmath102 $ in @xmath36 open set @xmath103 contains @xmath104 $ two points @xmath105 geodesic @xmath106 $ ] in @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath7-domain discuss ultralimits metric spaces fix nonprinciple ultrafilter @xmath107 natural numbers denote @xmath108 @xmath107-power of @xmath36 space @xmath36 subspace @xmath108 point @xmath109 denote @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112-ball centered at @xmath23 in @xmath36 @xmath108 check @xmath110 @xmath7-domain so @xmath111contradiction assume sequence geodesics @xmath113 $ @xmath114 @xmath113 each @xmath116 @xmath107-limit of @xmath113 geodesic in @xmath108 from @xmath117 to @xmath118 not in @xmath89 $ ] geodesics @xmath108 bifurcate @xmath119 $ if @xmath120 small @xmath121 forms @xmath7-domain contradiction split geodesic @xmath89 $ into segments each segment in @xmath7-domain sequence points @xmath122 on @xmath89 $ ] sequence @xmath123 increasing each geodesic @xmath124 $ in @xmath7-domain @xmath120 sequence chosen @xmath125 applying lemma segment @xmath126 $ belongs one @xmath7-domain key lemma three points @xmath127 @xmath34qs small @xmath41 [ ( * ) ] holds for @xmath128 @xmath32 @xmath129 @xmath130 arbitrary small triangle inequality implies [ ( * ) ] holds for @xmath23 @xmath32 @xmath31 alternative proof key lemma cat s cradle construction from @xcite learn radial curves radial monotonicity if everything suggested get weaker version key lemma prove required estimate if @xmath64 bigger than bisector @xmath62 at @xmath66 good enough for rest proof playing with construction making @xmath112 depend on @xmath116 get key lemma full generality | 0.492088 | 3,213 | 1,814 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,707 | after the discovery of a scalar resonance , resembling the higgs boson , its couplings have been extensively studied via the measurement of various production and decay channels on the invariant mass peak .
recently , it has been suggested the possibility to use off - shell measurements : in particular , cms has published results based on the high - invariant mass cross section of the process @xmath0 , which contains the contribution of the higgs . while this measurement has been interpreted as a constraint on the higgs width after very specific assumptions are taken on the higgs couplings , in this letter we show that a much more model - independent interpretation is possible .
lycen 2014 - 08 .5 cm * higgs couplings : disentangling new physics with off - shell measurements*.1 cm * giacomo cacciapaglia , aldo deandrea , guillaume drieu la rochelle and jean - baptiste flament * _ universit de lyon , f-69622 lyon , france ; universit lyon 1 , villeurbanne ; + cnrs / in2p3 , umr5822 , institut de physique nuclaire de lyon + f-69622 villeurbanne cedex , france
_ + g.cacciapaglia@ipnl.in2p3.fr , deandrea@ipnl.in2p3.fr , g.drieu-la-rochelle@ipnl.in2p3.fr , j-b.flament@ipnl.in2p3.fr since the discovery of a scalar boson at the lhc by the atlas and cms collaborations , much effort has been devoted to the study of its properties .
so far , most of the information has been obtained by extracting its couplings from the cross - section measurements in various production / decay modes on the resonance peak @xcite . interpreting those results in a beyond the standard model ( bsm ) context can be easily done in terms of a handful of parameters encoding the modification of the couplings to standard particles and , among the many proposals , one has been chosen as an official recommendation by experimentalists and theorists together @xcite . recently ,
a novel kind of measurement has been put forward , where higgs couplings are extracted from the cross - section integrated away from the resonance peak @xcite , and the first results from cms on the @xmath1 leptons have been published @xcite .
this new class of measurements is most welcome , since it carries information on the higgs couplings at a different mass scale than its mass shell , and such a dependence on the partonic centre of mass energy @xmath2 is paramount to distinguishing bsm effects .
although the measurement @xcite was initially proposed as a mean of determining the higgs width , it was quickly recognised in @xcite that such an extraction was too model - dependent to be meaningful . in this short letter
, we want to point out that the measurement can be primarily interpreted as a bound on the coupling of the higgs to tops and on the loop contribution of new heavy states to the coupling to gluons , in the limit of heavy new physics coloured states .
the direct sensitivity to the new loop is novel , as it is not possible to disentangle it from on - peak measurements .
+ in the experimental analysis @xcite the signal region is defined in order to enhance the rate of events coming from the @xmath0 process , which consists of a box diagram plus the s - channel higgs , over the @xmath3 background .
the higgs contribution consists mainly of a gluon fusion production followed by the decay to two @xmath4 bosons , which interferes with the box diagram .
off - shell , the cross section does not depend explicitly on the higgs width : however , one can always compensate for a different value of the width in the peak region by rescaling appropriately the couplings of the higgs to tops and @xmath5 , thus it is the rescaling of the couplings that affects the off - shell cross section .
the interpretation in terms of width , therefore , only works under very specific assumptions : a large contribution to the total width coming from new decay channels , and the absence of new particles running in the higgs to gluons loop .
the latter point , already properly stressed in @xcite , arises from the fact that at a partonic centre of mass energy away from the higgs mass peak , the loops participating in the production ( and decay ) of the higgs may be resolved if the mass of the exchanged particle is light .
this is the case for standard model ( sm ) loops . to be specific
, the measurement in @xcite is dominated by the gluon fusion production , which is mainly mediated by a top loop in the sm .
this loop form factor does depend on the scale and is significantly different at the higgs mass shell @xmath6 gev and in an off - peak region @xmath7 gev above the top pair threshold .
if the particle running in the loop were much heavier , say around 1 tev , the scale dependence would be quite different . in bsm scenarios
, one can typically expect both modifications of the tree level couplings to the top and new heavy coloured states running in the loop .
due to direct searches at the lhc , the mass of the new states is bound to be quite heavy , thus the approximation of heavy new states is justified . for an on - shell higgs , a cancellation between the two effects may and often does occur , so that the presence of new physics may not appear in on - peak measurement .
then it is clear that only measurements at different @xmath2 can distinguish the two effects since the top and the new physics contribution have a different scale dependence . in this perspective
, the parametrisation of the higgs couplings we proposed in @xcite is very handy , as it suggests to separate into two independent parameters the tree level modification of the top coupling and the effect of any loop of new physics states . the two parameters , relevant for our discussion , are defined as is defined in the same way , while the coupling to the gluons is defined as @xmath8 on - shell , the parameters in the two sets are simply related : @xmath9 , while this degeneracy is removed off - shell .
the difference between the two choices for the coupling to the gluons is crucial for the study of bsm effects from off - shell measurements . ]
@xmath10 where @xmath11 stands for the on - shell amplitude of the process , @xmath12 stands for the contribution from new particles while @xmath13 is the contribution from the top loop with sm coupling to the higgs .
the contribution of new physics in the loop is normalised to the top loop following the expectation that the main contribution comes from new particles associated with the top mass generation .
the two parameters enter in the calculation of the cross section in two different combinations on - peak and off - shell , so that the two effects can be clearly separated by using this parametrisation . [
cols="^,^ " , ] the form factor associated with @xmath14 depends on the mass of the particle(s ) running in the loop , however this dependence is suppressed for large values of the mass , as the loop can be replaced by a higher order operator . to quantify this statement , we considered the process @xmath15 and study the dependence of the off - shell cross section . following the experimental study @xcite , by off - shell cross section
we define the cross section integrated over a range @xmath16 gev after the basic experimental cuts .
note however that this is an intermediate definition between the off - shell region defined in @xcite ( @xmath17gev ) and the signal - enriched region ( @xmath18 gev plus a cut on a matrix element mela discriminant ) , since our cross sections is estimated before the mela discriminant cut .
our calculation has been performed by using the code ` gg2vv ` @xcite , modified by us in order to include the effect of a heavy particle loop . to be specific ,
all the results in this paper are based on a top - like fermion running in the loop . in the left panel of figure [ fig : chi2 ]
we show the dependence of the off - shell cross section as a function of the new fermion mass , fixing @xmath19 ( so that the top loop is standard ) and @xmath20 . from the plot
we can see that the value starts becoming fairly independent on the mass between @xmath21 gev and @xmath22 tev : considering the typical direct bounds from lhc on coloured new particles , the approximation of infinite mass is very effective . in the right panel of figure
[ fig : chi2 ] we also show iso - cross section contours as a function of @xmath23 and @xmath14 together with the region of parameters preferred by on - peak measurements and for large new physics mass .
the degenerate direction @xmath24 is now resolved , thus an interpretation of the experimental bound in terms of these two parameters can be useful to resolve this degeneracy and directly probe new physics loops in the higgs to gluon coupling . in table 1 of @xcite , the off - shell signal - enriched region after mela discrimination
is shown to contain @xmath25 events against the expected @xmath26 : these numbers , when compared to the @xmath27 expected @xmath28 events , show that at @xmath29% c.l .
the study is sensitive to an approximate doubling of the @xmath30 cross section .
the actual bound is extracted from a signal enhanced region , thanks to a matrix element discriminant .
however , the experimental analysis is performed in absence of the new physics loop , therefore a direct reinterpretation of the bound can not be done because the energy dependence and kinematics of the top and new physics loops can differ substantially .
we leave a full analysis for a future publication , and for the experimental collaborations .
the main advantage of our proposal is that the analysis results will contain much more information that the interpretation in terms of the higgs width .
the higgs width bound can be recovered in the limit @xmath31 : in this case , a rescaling of the width by a factor @xmath32 can be compensated on - peak by @xmath33 .
therefore , the published bound @xmath34 at 95% cl can be re - expressed as an upper bound on @xmath35 ( dot in figure [ fig : chi2 ] , with the excluded line on the right side ) .
we can see that this dot is close to the iso - contour giving a doubled cross section , consistently with the previous remark about numbers of events .
this bound , however , only applies to positive values of @xmath23 and it does not cover the possibility of negative couplings , for which the interference term has different sign . to compare this bound with the constraints from the on - peak measurements , in figure [ fig : chi2 ] we show the result of the fit @xcite where we leave the two parameters @xmath23 and @xmath36 free , profile over the new physics loop in the di - photon coupling in order to fit the di - photon signal , and set all the other couplings to the standard model value .
the plot clearly show that the on - peak measurements have a degeneracy for @xmath24 , which is removed by the off - shell measurement .
an analysis of the off - shell measurement in terms of the two parameters would clearly add important information on the higgs couplings , independently on its width .
it is finally interesting to quote the direct bound on @xmath23 coming from the measurement of the @xmath37 associated production . assuming that the decay rate in @xmath38 is standard model like
, the cross section is simply proportional to @xmath39 : from the cms published bound @xcite based on an integrated luminosity of 5 fb@xmath40 at 8 tev , we can extract @xmath41 , while the atlas measurement with full 8 tev dataset leads to @xmath42 at 95%cl @xcite .
+ the simple analysis in this letter shows that the off - shell measurement of @xmath0 , performed by cms @xcite , can be recast to a model - independent bound on the couplings of the higgs to the top and on the contribution of new states in the higgs to gluon coupling . in this perspective , the parametrisation of the higgs couplings that we proposed in previous publications @xcite , where two independent parameters are used for the tree level top coupling and new physics loops , are very useful for a model - independent interpretation of off - shell measurements . | we thank s. moretti for pointing out to us the cms measurement , and initiating the discussion leading to this letter .
we also thank s. gascon - shotkin for useful discussion .
we acknowledge partial support from the labex - lio ( lyon institute of origins ) under grant anr-10-labx-66 and frama ( fr3127 , fdration de recherche `` andr marie ampre '' ) .
ad is partially supported by institut universitaire de france . | thank s. moretti cms measurement initiating discussion thank s. gascon - shotkin discussion acknowledge partial support labex - lio lyon institute origins grant anr-10-labx-66 frama recherche marie partially supported institut universitaire france | 0.067138 | 103 | 51 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,724 | we examine gamow s method for calculating the decay rate of a wave function initially located within a potential well . using elementary techniques , we examine a very simple , exactly solvable model , in order to show why it is so reliable for calculating decay rates , in spite of its conceptual problems .
we also discuss the regime of validity of the exponential decay law . | complex - energy `` eigenfunctions '' made their dbut in quantum mechanics through the hands of gamow , in the theory of alpha - decay @xcite .
gamow imposed an `` outgoing wave boundary condition '' on the solutions of the schrdinger equation for an alpha - particle trapped in the nucleus .
since there is only an _ outgoing _ flux of alpha - particles , the wavefunction @xmath0 must behave far from the nucleus as ( for simplicity , we consider an s - wave , and use units such that @xmath1 ) @xmath2 this boundary condition , together with the requirement of finiteness of the wave function at the origin , gives rise to a quantization condition on the values of @xmath3 ( and , therefore , on the values of @xmath4 ) .
it turns out that such values are complex : @xmath5 and so it follows that @xmath6 thus , if @xmath7 , the probability of finding the alpha - particle in the nucleus decays exponentially in time .
the lifetime of the nucleus is then given by @xmath8 , and the energy of the emitted alpha - particle by @xmath9 .
although very natural , this interpretation suffers from some difficulties .
how can the energy , which is an observable quantity , be complex ?
( in other words , how can the hamiltonian , which is a hermitean operator , have complex eigenvalues ? ) also , these `` eigenfunctions '' are not normalizable , since @xmath10 positive implies @xmath11 positive and so , according to ( [ |psi| ] ) , @xmath12 diverges exponentially with @xmath13 . in spite of such problems ( which , in fact , are closely related ) , it is a fact of life that alpha - decay , as well as other types of decay , does obey an exponential decay law and , in many cases , gamow s method provides a very good estimate for the decay rate .
why this method works is a question that has been addressed in the literature using a variety of techniques @xcite .
here we examine this question in a very elementary way , using techniques that can be found in any standard quantum mechanics textbook and some rudiments of complex analysis .
this paper is structured as follows . in section [ ii ] , we show gamow s method in action for a very simple potential . some of the results obtained there are used in section [ iii ] , where we study the time evolution of a wave packet initially confined in the potential well defined in section [ ii ] .
this is done with the help of the propagator , built with the _ true _ eigenfunctions ( i.e. , associated to _
real _ eigenenergies ) of the hamiltonian . as a bonus ,
we show that the exponential decay law is not valid either for very small or for very large times .
this is the content of section [ iv ] , where the region of validity of the exponential decay law is roughly delimited .
in order to exhibit gamow s method in action , we shall study the escape of a particle from the potential well given by : @xmath14 ( escape from this potential well was studied in detail in refs.@xcite . in this section
we follow closely the treatment of ref.@xcite . )
the positive dimensionless constant @xmath15 is a measure of the `` opacity '' of the barrier at @xmath16 ; in the limit @xmath17 , the barrier becomes impenetrable , and the energy levels inside the well are quantized . if @xmath15 is finite , but large , a particle is not confined to the well anymore , but it usually stays there for a long time before it escapes . if @xmath15 is small , the particle can easily tunnel through the barrier , and quickly escape from the potential well .
metastability , therefore , can only be achieved if the barrier is very opaque , i.e. , @xmath18 .
since this is the most interesting situation , we shall assume this to be the case in what follows . to find out how fast the particle escapes from the potential well
, we must solve the schrdinger equation @xmath19 @xmath20 is a particular solution of this equation , provided @xmath21 satisfies the time - independent schrdinger equation @xmath22 denoting the regions @xmath23 and @xmath24 by the indices 1 and 2 , respectively , the corresponding wave functions @xmath25 @xmath26 satisfy the free - particle schrdinger equation : @xmath27 since the wall at the origin is impenetrable , @xmath28 must be zero ; the solution of eq .
( [ free ] ) which obeys this boundary condition is @xmath29 to determine @xmath30 , we follow gamow s reasoning @xcite and require @xmath30 to be an outgoing wave . therefore , we select , from the admissible solutions of eq .
( [ free ] ) , @xmath31 the wave function must be continuous at @xmath16 , so that @xmath32 , or @xmath33 on the other hand , the derivative of the wave function has a discontinuity at @xmath16 , which can be determined by integrating both sides of ( [ sch ] ) from @xmath34 to @xmath35 , with @xmath36 : @xmath37 from which there follows another relation between @xmath38 and @xmath39 : @xmath40 combining ( [ cont1 ] ) and ( [ discont2 ] ) , we obtain a quantization condition for @xmath3 : @xmath41 the roots of eq .
( [ quant ] ) are complex and situated in the half - plane @xmath42 ; when @xmath18 , those which are closest to the origin are given by @xcite @xmath43 ( for each one of these roots , which are located in the fourth quadrant of the complex @xmath3-plane , there is a corresponding one in the third quadrant , given by @xmath44 .
the latter are associated to `` growing states '' @xcite and play no role in what follows . )
the corresponding eigenenergies are @xmath45 the imaginary part of @xmath46 gives rise to an exponential decay of @xmath47 , with lifetime equal to @xmath48 since the corresponding value of @xmath49 is very small ( @xmath50 ) , one may be tempted to say that the probability of finding the particle outside the well is negligible in comparison with the probability of finding the particle inside the well .
normalizing @xmath51 in such a way that the latter equals one when @xmath52 , the probability of finding the particle inside the well at time @xmath53 , if it were in the @xmath54-th decaying state at @xmath52 , would be @xmath55 the trouble with this interpretation is that @xmath56 , and so @xmath57 diverges exponentially as @xmath58 , since , according to ( [ phi2 ] ) , @xmath59 outside the well . because of this `` exponential catastrophe '' , the decaying states are nonnormalizible and , therefore , can not be accepted as legitimate solutions of the schrdinger equation ( although one can find in the literature @xcite the assertion that they are `` rigorous '' solutions of the time - dependent schrdinger equation ) .
we now return to eq .
( [ free ] ) and write , for the solution in region 2 , instead of ( [ phi2 ] ) , the sum of an outgoing plus an incoming wave : @xmath60 continuity of the wave function at @xmath16 implies @xmath61 as before , the derivative of the wave function has a discontinuity at @xmath16 , given by eq .
( [ discont1 ] ) , from which it follows , instead of ( [ discont2 ] ) , @xmath62 solving ( [ cont2 ] ) and ( [ discont3 ] ) for @xmath38 and @xmath39 , we find [ ab ] @xmath63 these expressions show a couple of interesting features : * @xmath64 for real values of @xmath3 , implying a zero net flux of probability through @xmath16 ; therefore , unlike the solution found in the previous section , there is no loss or accumulation of probability in the well region . *
@xmath65 if @xmath66 , except if @xmath3 is close to a pole of @xmath67 , in which case @xmath68 may become very large . to find the poles of @xmath38 we must solve the equation @xmath69 , which , after some algebraic manipulations , reads @xmath70 this is the same as eq .
( [ quant ] ) ! is this a coincidence ?
in fact , no . according to ( [ ab ] ) , @xmath38 and @xmath39 have the same poles ; therefore , near a pole both @xmath68 and @xmath71 are very large , and eqs .
( [ cont2 ] ) and ( [ discont3 ] ) become equivalent to eqs .
( [ cont1 ] ) and ( [ discont2 ] ) , respectively . in
what follows , we shall show that the poles of @xmath38 ( and @xmath39 ) play an important role in the decay process .
suppose that at @xmath52 the particle is known to be in the region @xmath72 with probability 1 ; in other words , its wave function @xmath73 is zero outside the well .
then , at a later time @xmath53 , the wave function is given by @xmath74 where the propagator , @xmath75 , can be written as @xmath76 the function @xmath77 is the solution of eq .
( [ sch ] ) corresponding to the energy @xmath4 : @xmath78 with this normalization , these functions satisfy the completeness relation @xcite @xmath79 eqs .
( [ psi1])([varphi ] ) give , for @xmath72 , @xmath80 where @xmath81 it is clear that the integral over @xmath3 is dominated by the resonances , i.e. , the neighborhood of the poles of @xmath67 .
since , for @xmath82 , @xmath83 when @xmath84 in the fourth quadrant , one can rotate must be an analytic function of @xmath3 , but this can be shown to be the case @xcite if @xmath85 is continuous in @xmath86 $ ] . ]
the integration contour by @xmath87 in the clockwise sense ( see fig
. 1 ) , thus obtaining @xmath88 where @xmath89 and @xmath90 the sum in ( [ psi3 ] ) takes into account the poles of @xmath67 which are situated in the region @xmath91 , and it corresponds to an expansion in gamow states ( for @xmath72 ) .
let us put aside , for a moment , the integral in ( [ psi3 ] ) ( it will be discussed in the next section ) .
then , the `` nonescape '' probability ( i.e. , the probability of finding the particle inside the well ) is given by @xmath92 where @xmath93 .
for @xmath18 , the interference terms are usually negligible , for @xmath94 and , therefore , the functions @xmath95 are approximately orthogonal . on the other hand ,
since the decay rate @xmath10 of the @xmath54-th decaying mode is a rapidly increasing function of @xmath54 ( @xmath96 ) , the decay becomes almost a pure exponential one when @xmath97 .
the system , therefore , `` loses memory '' of the initial state . finally , let us note that no exponential catastrophe occurs with @xmath98 .
in fact , one can easily show , using ( [ psi1 ] ) , ( [ g ] ) , ( [ completeness ] ) and the orthogonality of the eigenfunctions @xmath77 , that @xmath99 so that an exponential growth of @xmath100 is completely ruled out .
in order to derive expression ( [ p(t ) ] ) for the nonescape probability , we had to neglect the first term on the right hand side of ( [ psi3 ] ) . in this section we show that such approximation is not valid either for very small or for very large times . that it can not be valid for very small @xmath53 follows from the fact that initially the decay is slower than exponential @xcite .
this can be easily proved with the help of the continuity equation @xcite : @xmath101_{x = a}.\ ] ] since , by hypothesis , @xmath102 , it follows that @xmath103 when @xmath52 , whereas for the expression ( [ p(t ) ] ) one has @xmath104 at @xmath52 . on the other hand ,
the exponential decay does not last forever .
after a sufficiently long time , it obeys a power law @xcite . to see this , note that the integral in ( [ psi3 ] ) , which we shall denote here by @xmath105 , is dominated by small values of @xmath3 when @xmath106 , and so can it be approximated by @xmath107 therefore , the nonescape probability behaves asymptotically as decays as @xmath108 when @xmath106 , in contrast to eq .
( [ pas ] ) .
however , there is a flaw in their argument ; when properly corrected @xcite , it also leads to @xmath109 asymptotically . ]
@xmath110 comparing ( [ pas ] ) with ( [ p(t ) ] ) , and using ( [ tau ] ) , one finds that they become comparable in magnitude when @xmath111 or , since @xmath18 , when @xmath112 in practice , when the decay begins to obey a power law the nonescape probability is so small @xmath113 that it should be very difficult to observe deviations from exponential decay .
( on the other hand , experimental evidence for non - exponential decay at _ small _ times has been reported recently @xcite . ) in closing this section , we would like to remark that the breakdown of the exponential decay law for either small or large times is not a peculiar feature of the potential ( [ v ] ) .
it is possible to show that an exponential decay can not last forever if the hamiltonian is bounded below @xcite , and can not occur for very small times if , besides that , the energy expectation value of the initial state is finite @xcite conditions which certainly must be satisfied by any realistic hamiltonian or state .
in this paper we showed that decaying states , although plagued by the exponential catastrophe , give a fairly good description of the decay of a metastable state , provided some conditions are satisfied . in fact , the main objective of this paper was to show that one _ can _ compute the decay rate solving the time independent schrdinger equation subject to the `` outgoing wave boundary condition . ''
this is far from being a trivial result , since the corresponding eigenstates are unphysical .
the effectiveness of the decaying states in describing the decay may be understood by noticing @xcite that they are good approximate solutions to the time - dependent schrdinger equation , although nonuniform ones ( i.e. , they are not valid in the entire range of values of @xmath53 and @xmath114 ) .
we thank gernot muenster and pavel exner , for bringing some references to our attention , and gilberto hollauer , for useful discussions .
this work had financial support from cnpq , finep , capes and fujb / ufrj .
1 . complex @xmath3-plane .
the poles of @xmath67 are represented by the small circles .
those in the fourth quadrant give rise to the sum over decaying modes in eq .
( [ psi3 ] ) when one rotates the integration contour of eq .
( [ psi2 ] ) the positive real semi - axis by @xmath87 in the clockwise sense ( dashed line ) . | complex - energy eigenfunctions in quantum mechanics gamow theory of alpha - decay @xcite gamow imposed outgoing wave boundary condition on solutions schrdinger equation for alpha - particle trapped in nucleus outgoing flux of alpha - particles wavefunction @xmath0 must behave far from nucleus units @xmath1 @xmath2 boundary condition requirement of finiteness of wave function origin quantization condition on values @xmath3 @xmath4 ) values complex : @xmath5 @xmath6 probability of finding alpha - particle in nucleus decays exponentially in time lifetime of nucleus given by @xmath8 energy of emitted alpha - particle by @xmath9 interpretation suffers difficulties energy observable quantity complex hamiltonian hermitean operator have complex eigenvalues eigenfunctions not normalizable @xmath10 positive implies @xmath11 positive @xmath12 diverges exponentially with @xmath13 problems closely related fact of life alpha - decay other obey exponential decay law gamow s method provides good estimate for decay rate why method works addressed in literature using techniques @xcite here examine question elementary using techniques in standard quantum mechanics textbook rudiments complex analysis paper structured section [ ii ] show gamow s method for simple potential results used in section [ iii ] study time evolution of wave packet confined in potential well defined ii with propagator built with true eigenfunctions hamiltonian show exponential decay law not valid for small or large times content of section [ iv ] region of validity of exponential decay law roughly delimited exhibit gamow s method study escape of particle from potential well given by @xmath14 escape studied in refs.@xcite follow positive dimensionless constant @xmath15 measure of opacity of barrier at @xmath16 in limit @xmath17 barrier becomes impenetrable energy levels inside well quantized if @xmath15 is finite but large particle not confined to well usually stays there long time before escapes@xmath15 small particle tunnel through barrier escape potential well metastability achieved if barrier opaque @xmath18 assume case particle escapes solve schrdinger equation @xmath19 @xmath20 solution @xmath21 satisfies time - independent schrdinger equation @xmath22 regions @xmath23 @xmath24 indices 1 2 wave functions @xmath25 @xmath26 satisfy free - particle schrdinger equation @xmath27 wall origin impenetrable @xmath28 zero solution @xmath29 determine @xmath30 follow gamow s reasoning require @xmath30 outgoing wave select solutions @xmath31 wave function continuous at @xmath16 @xmath32 @xmath33 derivative wave function discontinuity at @xmath16 determined integrating sides of ( [ sch ] ) from @xmath34 to @xmath35 @xmath36 : @xmath37 relation between @xmath38 @xmath39 : @xmath40 combining ( [ cont1 ] [ discont2 ] ) quantization condition for @xmath3 : @xmath41 roots of eq .[ quant ] ) complex half - plane @xmath42 ; @xmath18 closest to origin given by @xcite @xmath43 ( roots fourth quadrant complex @xmath3-plane corresponding third quadrant by @xmath44 latter associated to growing states @xcite no role follows corresponding eigenenergies are @xmath45 imaginary part @xmath46 exponential decay @xmath47 lifetime equal to @xmath48 value @xmath49 small @xmath50 ) probability finding particle outside well negligible inside well normalizing @xmath51 latter equals one @xmath52 probability finding particle inside well @xmath53 @xmath54-th decaying state @xmath52 @xmath55 trouble @xmath56 @xmath57 diverges exponentially as @xmath58 phi2 ] @xmath59 outside well exponential catastrophe decaying states nonnormalizible not accepted legitimate solutions schrdinger equation literature @xcite rigorous '' solutions time - dependent schrdinger equation return to eq .free ] write solution region 2 instead phi2 ] sum outgoing incoming wave @xmath60 continuity wave function @xmath16 implies @xmath61 derivative wave discontinuity @xmath16 given eq . [ discont1 ] ) instead discont2 ] @xmath62 solving [ cont2 ] discont3 ] @xmath38 @xmath39 find [ ab ] @xmath63 expressions show interesting features @xmath64 real values @xmath3 zero net flux probability @xmath16 no loss accumulation probability well region @xmath65 @xmath66 except @xmath3 close pole @xmath67 @xmath68 large find poles @xmath38 solve equation @xmath69 reads @xmath70 same as eq . ( [ quant ] ) coincidence ? no [ ab ] ) @xmath38 @xmath39 same poles near pole @xmath68 @xmath71 large eqs ( [ cont2 ] ) [ discont3 ] ) equivalent eqs ( [ cont1 ] ) [ discont2 ] ) poles @xmath38 @xmath39 important role decay process@xmath52 particle in region @xmath72 probability 1 wave function @xmath73 zero outside well later @xmath53 wave function by @xmath74 propagator @xmath75 written as @xmath76 function @xmath77 solution of eq . sch energy @xmath4 : @xmath78 functions satisfy completeness relation @xcite @xmath79 eqs . psi1])( @xmath72 @xmath80 @xmath81 integral over @xmath3 dominated by resonances neighborhood of poles @xmath67 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 fourth quadrant rotate analytic function of @xmath3 @xmath85 continuous in @xmath86 integration contour by @xmath87 clockwise sense fig . 1 @xmath88 @xmath89 and @xmath90 sum in ( [ psi3 ] ) poles of @xmath67 region @xmath91 corresponds to expansion in gamow states for @xmath72 ) integral [ psi3 ] ) next nonescape '' probability finding particle inside well by @xmath92 where @xmath93 @xmath18 interference terms negligible @xmath94 functions @xmath95 orthogonal decay rate @xmath10 @xmath54-th mode rapidly increasing function @xmath54 @xmath96 decay becomes pure exponential when @xmath97 system loses memory initial state no exponential catastrophe @xmath98 show [ psi1 ] [ g ] ) completeness ] orthogonality eigenfunctions @xmath77 @xmath99 exponential growth of @xmath100 ruled out derive expression ( [ p(t ) ] ) nonescape probability neglect first term right side ( [ psi3 ] ) approximation not valid for very small large times @xmath53 initially decay slower than exponential @xcite proved continuity equation @xcite : @xmath101_{x = a}.\ ] hypothesis @xmath102 follows @xmath103 when @xmath52 expression ( [ p(t ) ] ) @xmath104 at @xmath52 exponential decay last forever long time obeys power law @xcite integral in ( [ psi3 ] ) by @xmath105 dominated by small values @xmath3 @xmath106 approximated by @xmath107 nonescape probability behaves asymptotically as decays @xmath108 @xmath106 contrast to eq ( [ pas ] ) flaw in argument corrected leads to @xmath109 asymptotically @xmath110 ( [ pas ] ) with ( [ p(t ) ] ) [ tau ] ) comparable in magnitude when @xmath111 or @xmath18 @xmath112 decay power law nonescape probability small @xmath113 difficult to observe deviations from exponential decay experimental evidence for non - exponential decay at small times reported recently @xcite breakdown of exponential decay law for small or large times not peculiar feature potential v ] exponential decay last forever if hamiltonian bounded below @xcite occur for small times if energy expectation value initial state finite decaying states exponential catastrophe give good description of decay of metastable state conditions satisfiedmain objective paper show compute decay rate solving time independent schrdinger equation subject outgoing wave boundary condition trivial result eigenstates unphysical effectiveness decaying states decay understood noticing @xcite good solutions time - dependent schrdinger equation nonuniform not valid entire values @xmath53 @xmath114 thank gernot muenster pavel exner references gilberto hollauer discussions work financial support from cnpq finep capes fujb / ufrj complex @xmath3-plane poles of @xmath67 represented by small circles fourth quadrant sum over decaying modes in eq rotates integration contour eq positive real semi - axis by @xmath87 clockwise sense dashed line | 0.566453 | 3,435 | 1,825 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,726 | we show results for the @xmath0 meson decay constant calculated both for @xmath0 mesons at rest and those with non - zero momentum and using both the temporal and spatial components of the axial vector current .
it is an important check of lattice systematic errors that all these determinations of @xmath1 should agree .
we also describe how well different smearings for the @xmath0 meson work at non - zero momentum - the optimal smearing has a narrow smearing on the @xmath2 quark . | matrix elements involving moving @xmath0 and @xmath3 mesons are important for studies of @xmath4 and @xmath5 decay .
it is necessary to understand the systematic errors in lattice qcd that come from the presence of non - zero momenta and the optimal way in which to handle such mesons on the lattice .
an easy place to study these effects is in the determination of the @xmath0 meson decay constant , @xmath1 @xcite . in the absence of discretisation errors
it should be true that @xmath6 we use both @xmath7 and @xmath8 with all current corrections and renormalisation through @xmath9 @xcite .
results shown are for an ensemble of 278 @xmath10 lattices at @xmath11 = 5.7 .
clover light quarks are used with @xmath12 and nrqcd heavy quarks are used with masses in lattice units of 2 and 8 ( @xmath13 = 4.0 ) .
all momenta are considered up to @xmath14 of 16 in units of @xmath15 , i.e. roughly 4 @xmath16 at this lattice spacing .
we generated heavy and light quark propagators with 3 different smearings : a delta function , a narrow gaussian ( width 1 ) and a broad gaussian ( width 3 ) .
we combined these smearings together to make 6 different smearings for the heavy - light meson and analysed the resulting smeared - smeared meson correlators using the constrained curve fitting methods described in @xcite .
the results are shown in figure 1 , which plots the amplitude of the ground state @xmath0 meson as a function of squared momentum for some of these smearings .
it is clear that the optimal smearing for a moving heavy - light meson is one in which the smearing on the heavy quark is a narrow one and the smearing on the light quark is a broad one .
this is not surprising if one considers that the heavy quark is carrying almost all of the meson momentum .
the overlap as a function of momentum is maximized if the heavy quark has a delta function smearing , but in that case the statistical noise is large because of the well - known problem that an unsmeared heavy quark has a poor signal / noise ratio @xcite . at zero momentum
this has led to the received wisdom that the heavy quark should have a broad smearing - figure 1 shows that this is not correct at non - zero momentum .
figure 2 amplifies this point by showing the rapid plateau and consequent small error on the kinetic energy possible with a good finite - momentum smearing , in contrast to that obtained with a smearing that might have been considered a good one at zero momentum .
we used smearing ` 5 ' from the above analysis and the constrained curve fitting methods to determine @xmath1 for moving @xmath0 mesons and the temporal axial current .
matrix elements for @xmath7 are obtained from a simultaneous fit to _ all _ @xmath17 ( i=0,1,2 ) and @xmath18 ( i=0,1,2,3,4 ) current correlators at a given momentum .
the construction of the continuum @xmath7 from @xmath19 is described in @xcite .
figure 3 shows results for the ratio : @xmath20 for @xmath21=8 using @xmath22 in the renormalisation .
the expected curve @xmath23 is also shown .
no disagreement is seen until the highest momentum . at @xmath21 = 2
, larger discrepancies appear @xcite .
the matrix elements for the spatial axial current behave rather differently to those for the temporal axial current since they must vanish when there is no component of @xmath24 along the direction of the current .
even the leading order current , @xmath25 = @xmath26 then has a matrix element @xmath27@xmath28 with respect to @xmath29 .
this is of the same order as the ` @xmath30 ' suppressed current contributions from @xmath31 = @xmath32 and @xmath33 = @xmath34 .
@xmath31 contributes at tree level and @xmath33 at one - loop to the final result for @xmath8 . to understand the size of different current contributions it is important to use a power - counting in both the external velocity and in @xmath35 @xcite .
figure 4 shows results for the ratio : @xmath36 as a function of @xmath37 for a range of values of @xmath38 , for @xmath21=8 .
the line shown is @xmath39 ( variation with @xmath38 of this line is not significant ) .
good agreement with the line is found for @xmath40 = 1,2 ( @xmath41 ) at all @xmath38 but @xmath40 = 3,4 show signs of deviation , presumably from missing current corrections that are higher order in the external velocity .
figure 4 shows agreement between @xmath1 from @xmath7 and @xmath8 which resolves a long - standing problem .
@xcite found a disagreement of @xmath27(10% ) when comparing the tree - level matrix elements for clover fermions .
this ignores the contribution of @xmath33 and does not allow for the clover equivalent of the different renormalisation of @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
both these effects are included here .
we have demonstrated the usefulness of optimal ( i.e. narrow ) smearing for heavy quarks in moving heavy - light mesons , and of constrained curve fitting in extracting results out to much higher momenta than have previously been attempted .
good agreement is found for @xmath1 at zero and non - zero momentum . for the temporal axial current at large @xmath21 this holds out to the highest momenta studied . to understand the behaviour of the currents at non - zero momentum it is important to use a power - counting appropriate to moving heavy - light mesons . * acknowledgements * sc , gc
, cd and jh are members of the ukqcd collaboration .
we are grateful to the following bodies for support of this work : pparc , doe , nsf and the eu under hprn-2000 - 00145 hadrons / lattice qcd .
9 j. simone , nucl .
. suppl . * 53 * ) 1997 386 .
c. morningstar and j. shigemitsu , prd*59 * ( 1999 ) 094504 .
g. p. lepage , these proceedings .
g. p. lepage , npb ( proc .
* 26 * ) 45 1992 .
s. collins _ et al _ , in preparation . | matrix elements @xmath0 mesons important for studies @xmath4 @xmath5 decay understand systematic errors in lattice qcd non - zero momenta optimal mesons @xmath0 meson decay constant @xmath1 @xcite discretisation errors @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 with corrections renormalisation through @xmath9 @xcite results for 278 @xmath10 lattices at @xmath11 = 5.7 clover light quarks used with @xmath12 heavy quarks with masses lattice units of 2 and 8 ( @xmath13 = 4.0 ) momenta considered up to @xmath14 of 16 units @xmath15 roughly 4 @xmath16 at lattice spacing generated heavy light quark propagators with 3 smearings delta combined 6 smearings for heavy - light meson analysed smeared meson correlators using constrained curve fitting methods results shown in figure 1 amplitude of ground state @xmath0 meson function of squared momentum for optimal smearing for moving heavy - light meson heavy narrow light broad heavy quark all meson momentumoverlap momentum if heavy quark delta function smearing statistical noise large unsmeared quark poor signal / noise ratio zero momentum heavy quark broad smearing not correct at non - zero momentum 2 rapid plateau small error kinetic energy with good finite - momentum smearing zero momentum used smearing 5 ' constrained curve fitting to determine @xmath1 for moving @xmath0 mesons temporal axial current matrix elements for @xmath7 obtained from simultaneous fit to @xmath17 current correlators at momentum construction continuum @xmath7 from @xmath19 described figure 3 results ratio : @xmath20 for @xmath21=8 using @xmath22 renormalisation expected curve @xmath23 shown no disagreement until highest momentum at @xmath21 = 2 larger discrepancies appear matrix elements for spatial axial current differently to temporal axial current vanish when no component of @xmath24 leading order current @xmath25 = @xmath26 has matrix element @xmath27@xmath28 @xmath29 as suppressed current contributions from @xmath31 = @xmath32 =@xmath31 contributes tree level one - loop final result @xmath8 understand current contributions use power - counting external velocity @xmath35 @xcite figure 4 shows results @xmath36 function @xmath37 values @xmath38 @xmath21=8 line shown @xmath39 variation @xmath38 not significant agreement @xmath40 = 1,2 @xmath38 @xmath40 = deviation missing current corrections external velocity figure 4 agreement @xmath1 @xmath7 @xmath8 resolves problem @xcite disagreement @xmath27(10% ) tree - level matrix elements clover fermions ignores contribution @xmath33 allow clover equivalent renormalisation @xmath42 @xmath43 effects included demonstrated usefulness optimal narrow smearing heavy quarks heavy - light mesons constrained curve fitting extracting results higher momenta agreement @xmath1 zero non - zero momentum temporal axial current @xmath21 highest momenta studied understand behaviour non - zero momentum use power - counting heavy - light mesons sc gc cd jh members ukqcd collaboration grateful bodies support pparc doe nsf eu hprn-2000 - 00145 hadrons lattice qcdsimone nucl suppl 53 * 1997 386 morningstar shigemitsu prd*59 1999 ) 094504 p. lepage proceedings npb proc. 26 * ) 45 1992 collins al preparation | 0.26229 | 1,482 | 768 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,729 | systematic studies on the production of strange hyperons and the @xmath0 meson as a function of beam energy and system size performed by the na49 collaboration are discussed .
hadronic transport models fail to describe the production of multi strange particles ( @xmath1 , @xmath2 ) , while statistical models are generally in good agreement to the measured particle yields at all energies .
the system size dependence is well reproduced by the core - corona approach .
new data on @xmath3 production are presented .
the yields of these short - lived resonances are significantly below the statistical model expectation .
this is in line with the interpretation that the measurable yields are reduced due to rescattering of their decay products inside the fireball . | the production of strange particles has always been a key observable in heavy - ion reactions and its enhancement was one of the first suggested signatures for quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) formation @xcite .
the predicted enhancement of strangeness production in nucleus
nucleus collisions relative to proton
proton reactions was established experimentally some time ago @xcite and it was also found that this enhancement is increasing with the strangeness content of the particle type @xcite . however , a clear interpretation of these phenomena requires a systematic investigation of the energy and system size dependence of strangeness production . in the following we report on some aspects of such a study done by the na49 experiment
at mid - rapidity of @xmath4 ( a ) , @xmath5 ( b ) , @xmath6 ( c ) , and @xmath7 ( d ) divided by the pion rapidity densities ( @xmath8 ) in central pb+pb and au+au collisions as a function of @xmath9 @xcite .
the systematic errors are represented by the gray boxes .
also shown are na57 @xcite , ags @xcite , and rhic @xcite data , as well as calculations with hadronic transport models ( hsd , urqmd1.3 @xcite ) and a statistical hadron gas model ( shm(b ) @xcite ) . ] the total yield of @xmath10 divided by the total number of pions @xmath11 ( @xmath12 ) versus the center - of - mass energy @xcite .
the dashed curve shows the prediction from the hadronic transport model urqmd1.3 @xcite . a hadron gas model without strangeness suppression @xcite
is shown by the full curve .
the open squares represent the fits from @xcite including a strangeness under - saturation factor @xmath13 . ]
the rapidity densities @xmath14 at mid - rapidity of @xmath0 divided by the pion rapidity densities ( @xmath8 ) in central nucleus - nucleus collisions as a function of @xmath9 @xcite . also shown are na45/ceres @xcite , and rhic @xcite data , as well as calculations with hadronic transport models ( urqmd1.3 @xcite ) and a statistical hadron gas model ( hgm @xcite ) . ]
figure [ fig : dndypion ] shows a comparison of the energy dependence of mid - rapidity @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and @xmath7 production to several models and results from other experiments . while the transport models urqmd1.3 and hsd provide a reasonable description of the @xmath4/@xmath15 amd @xmath5/@xmath15 ratios , they are clearly below the data points in case of the @xmath6 and @xmath7 .
this might indicate that an additional partonic contribution is necessary to reach the production rates observed for multi - strange particles .
statistical models on the other hand generally provide a better match to the data .
these models are based on the assumption that the particle yields correspond to their chemical equilibrium value and can thus be described by the parameters temperature @xmath16 , baryonic chemical potential @xmath17 , volume @xmath18 , and , in some implementations , by an additional strangeness under - saturation factor @xmath13 .
the curves shown in fig . [ fig : dndypion ] labeled shm(b ) are taken from @xcite and are based on parametrizations of the @xmath9 dependence of @xmath16 and @xmath17 .
the difference between the two model approaches discussed here is even more prominent for the @xmath2 , as demonstrated in fig .
[ fig : omegaedep ] . in this case
the deviation to the hadronic transport model is of the order of a factor of 10 , while both the statistical model approaches shown in fig .
[ fig : omegaedep ] are quite close to the data points .
while multi - strange hyperons generally seem to be close to the full equilibrium expectation at all energies , the @xmath0-meson exhibits significant discrepancies ( see fig .
[ fig : phiedep ] ) .
while at lower energies the @xmath0 production is close to both , the statistical model and the transport model urqmd1.3 , at top sps energies none of the models does match the measurements .
please note that the appearant discrepancy of urqmd1.3 with the @xmath0/@xmath15 ratios at lower energies , as visible in fig .
[ fig : phiedep ] , is rather due to an overestimate of the pion yields and not an underestimate of the @xmath0 yields @xcite . also shown in fig .
[ fig : phiedep ] is a measurement of the @xmath0 yields via the dielectron decay @xmath19 performed by the na45 collaboration at 158 @xcite .
this result agrees quite well with the na49 result , which has been measured using the hadronic decay branch @xmath20 .
divided by the average number of wounded nucleons @xmath21 of @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 at mid - rapidity for pb+pb collisions at 40@xmath22 and 158 , as well as for near - central c+c and si+si reactions at 158 , as a function of @xmath21 @xcite . also shown
are data of the na57 collaboration @xcite ( open stars ) and calculations with the hsd model @xcite ( dotted lines ) , the urqmd2.3 model @xcite ( dashed lines ) , and the core - corona approach ( solid lines ) @xcite . ]
values at mid - rapidity for pb+pb collisions at 40@xmath22 and 158 , as well as for near - central c+c and si+si reactions at 158 @xcite .
the ( anti-)proton data are taken from @xcite . also shown are the results from a fit for @xmath4 and @xmath5 with the core - corona approach ( solid lines ) . ] the system size dependence of @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 production close to mid - rapidity , as measured at sps energies , is summarized in fig .
[ fig : dndy_vs_nw ] . for @xmath4 and @xmath5 a relatively early saturation at @xmath23
is observed by na49 .
however , a clear discrepancy between the data of na49 and na57 is still present .
the transport models urqmd2.3 @xcite and hsd @xcite are close to the data points for @xmath4 , but are slightly below the @xmath5 measurements .
the @xmath6 production is clearly under - predicted at all system sizes .
the core - corona approach @xcite provides generally a much better description of the system size dependence of all strange particle species . here
the relevant quantity is the fraction of nucleons that scatter more than once @xmath24 which can be calculated in a glauber model .
this allows for an interpolation between the yields @xmath25 measured in elementary p+p ( @xmath26 ) and in central nucleus - nucleus collisions ( @xmath27 ) : @xmath28\end{aligned}\ ] ] please note that the curves shown in fig .
[ fig : dndy_vs_nw ] and fig .
[ fig : meanmt_vs_nw ] are based on a function @xmath24 that was calculated for pb+pb interactions
. therefore their comparison to the smaller systems c+c and si+si is not directly possible , since their surface to volume ratio is different .
it is interesting to observe that this approach not only works for yields , but also for dynamical quantities such as @xmath29 ( see fig .
[ fig : meanmt_vs_nw ] ) .
this suggests that the core - corona picture provides in general a reasonable way for understanding the evolution from elementary p+p to central pb+pb collisions .
( @xmath30 ) divided by the total yields of @xmath31 ( @xmath32 ) in p+p and nucleus - nucleus collisions at 158 as a function of the average number of wounded nucleons @xmath21 .
lower panel : the total yield of @xmath3 ( @xmath30 ) , @xmath33 , and @xmath0 in central pb+pb collisions at 158 divided by the expectation from a statistical model fit @xcite as a function of the resonance lifetime @xmath34 . ]
( @xmath30 ) divided by the total yields of @xmath31 ( @xmath32 ) in p+p and nucleus - nucleus collisions at 158 as a function of the average number of wounded nucleons @xmath21 .
lower panel : the total yield of @xmath3 ( @xmath30 ) , @xmath33 , and @xmath0 in central pb+pb collisions at 158 divided by the expectation from a statistical model fit @xcite as a function of the resonance lifetime @xmath34 . ] strange resonances are of particular interest due to their short lifetimes that are in the same order as the lifetime of the fireball . because of
this their yields can still be modified after chemical freeze - out via destruction and regeneration mechanisms .
for instance the particles resulting from the decay of such a resonance can rescatter in the fireball such that the resonance can not be reconstructed any more .
these effects can thus lead to deviations from the chemical equilibrium expectation .
new data on the @xmath3 ( @xmath30 ) production in central nucleus - nucleus collisions at 158 are summarized in fig .
[ fig : kstar ] . the @xmath3 ( @xmath30 )
are reconstructed via the decay @xmath35 ( @xmath36 ) . as shown in the upper panel of fig .
[ fig : kstar ] , the system size dependence of the total @xmath3 yield is clearly different than the one of charged kaons , the ratios @xmath3/@xmath31 ( @xmath30/@xmath32 ) decrease with increasing system size .
this could be indicative of a stronger reduction of the measurable @xmath3 yields in the larger fireball of central pb+pb reactions compared to the smaller one produced in c+c and si+si collsions , because here their decay products have a higher probability of rescattering with the medium .
the lower panel of fig .
[ fig : kstar ] compares the total yields of several resonances ( @xmath3 , @xmath33 , and @xmath0 ) to the expectations from a statistical model fit @xcite .
the fit did not include the resonances themselves .
the deviation is largest for the short lived @xmath3 , while it is slighly less pronounced for the @xmath33 and even less for the @xmath0 , which has a much longer lifetime than the other two resonances .
comparing the yields of resonances with different lifetimes can thus provide a means to study the time - like extension of the hot and dense fireball created in heavy ion reactions . | production strange particles key in heavy - ion reactions enhancement for quark - gluon plasma formation enhancement strangeness production in nucleus collisions proton reactions established increasing with strangeness content particle type interpretation requires investigation of energy system size dependence strangeness production aspects study na49 experiment at mid - rapidity of @xmath4 divided by pion rapidity densities in central pb+pb au+au collisions @xmath9 systematic errors represented by gray boxes shown na57 ags rhic data calculations with hadronic transport models statistical hadron gas model total yield of @xmath10 divided by total number of pions @xmath11 versus center - of - mass energy @xcite dashed curve shows prediction from hadronic transport model hadron gas model without strangeness suppression shown by full curve open squares represent fits from including strangeness under - saturation factor rapidity densities @xmath14 at mid - rapidity of @xmath0 divided by pion rapidity densities in central nucleus - nucleus collisions function @xmath9 @xciteshown na45/ceres rhic @xcite data calculations with hadronic transport models urqmd1.3 statistical hadron gas model hgm figure shows comparison energy dependence of mid - rapidity @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath7 production to models results experiments transport models urqmd1.3 hsd provide reasonable @xmath4/ @xmath5/ ratios below data points @xmath6 @xmath7 additional partonic contribution necessary production rates for multi - strange particles statistical models provide better match data based particle yields correspond to chemical equilibrium value described by temperature baryonic chemical potential volume additional strangeness under - saturation factor @xmath13 curves in fig labeled shm(b taken from @xcite based on parametrizations @xmath9 dependence of @xmath16 @xmath17 difference between model approaches prominent for @xmath2 demonstrated in fig . omegaedep deviation to hadronic transport model factor of 10 statistical model approaches close to data points multi - strange hyperons close to full equilibrium expectation at all energies @xmath0-meson exhibits significant discrepanciesfig : phiedep lower energies @xmath0 production close to statistical model transport model urqmd1.3 top energies none match measurements discrepancy of urqmd1.3 with @xmath0/@xmath15 ratios at lower energies due to overestimate pion yields not underestimate @xmath0 yields measurement @xmath0 yields via dielectron decay na45 collaboration at 158 @xcite result agrees with na49 result measured using hadronic decay branch @xmath20 divided by average wounded nucleons @xmath21 of @xmath4 @xmath6 mid - rapidity for pb+pb collisions at 40@xmath22 158 near - central c+c si+si reactions at 158 data na57 collaboration calculations with hsd model urqmd2.3 model core - corona approach values mid - rapidity for pb+pb collisions at 40@xmath22 158 near - central c+c si+si reactions at 158 anti-)proton data from @xcite results fit for @xmath4 @xmath5 with core - corona approachsystem size dependence of @xmath4 production to mid - rapidity measured at sps energies summarized in fig . early saturation at @xmath23 observed by na49 discrepancy between data na49 and na57 transport models urqmd2.3 @xcite hsd close to data points for @xmath4 slightly below @xmath5 measurements @xmath6 production under - predicted at all system sizes core - corona approach better description of system size dependence of strange particle species relevant quantity is fraction of nucleons scatter more than once @xmath24 calculated in glauber model allows interpolation between yields @xmath25 in elementary p+p central nucleus - collisions curves in fig based on function @xmath24 calculated for pb+pb interactions comparison to smaller systems c+c si+si not possible surface to volume ratio different approach works for yields dynamical quantities @xmath29 core - corona picture understanding evolution from elementary p+p to central pb+pb collisions@xmath30 ) divided by yields @xmath31 ) in p+p nucleus - nucleus collisions at 158 average wounded nucleons @xmath21 total yield of @xmath3 @xmath0 in central pb+pb collisions at 158 divided by statistical model fit resonance lifetime @xmath34 @xmath30 ) divided by yields @xmath31 ) in p+p collisions at 158 average wounded nucleons @xmath21 total yield of @xmath3 @xmath0 in central pb+pb collisions at 158 divided by model fit resonance lifetime @xmath34 strange resonances short lifetimes same as lifetime fireball yields be modified after chemical freeze - out via destruction regeneration particles from decay resonance can rescatter fireball lead to deviations from chemical equilibrium new data on @xmath3 ) production in central nucleus - collisions at 158 summarized in fig . reconstructed via decay @xmath35 ( @xmath36 ) upper fig fig : kstar system size dependence @xmath3 yield different than charged kaons ratios @xmath3/@xmath31/@xmath32 decrease increasing system size indicative reduction @xmath3 yields in larger fireball central pb+pb reactions smaller c+c si+si collsions decay products higher probability rescattering with medium lower panel fig kstar compares yields resonances @xmath3 @xmath33 @xmath0 to expectations statistical model fit @xcite fit include resonances deviation largest for short lived @xmath3 less @xmath33 less @xmath0 longer lifetime comparing yields resonances lifetimes study time - extension of hot dense fireball in heavy ion reactions | 0.353638 | 2,442 | 1,189 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,736 | diffusion of ions through a fluctuating polymeric host is studied both by monte carlo simulation of the complete system dynamics and by dynamic bond percolation ( dbp ) theory .
comparison of both methods suggests a multiscale - like approach for calculating the diffusion coefficients of the ions .
charge transport in polymer ion conductors : a monte carlo study + | chain polymers carrying electro - negative atoms ( e.g. oxygen or nitrogen ) in their repeat unit can act as solvents for certain salts .
well - known examples are li - salts dissolved in polyethylene - oxide ( peo ) . at temperatures sufficiently above the glass - transition temperature these polymer - salt solutions
show significant dc ionic @xmath0 conductivities .
such `` polymer electrolytes '' offer widespread applications in batteries , sensors and fuel cells . from the scientific point of view
, an important goal is to improve our understanding of the electrical conduction mechanism in polymer electrolytes , and in particular to elucidate the interplay between ion diffusion and the polymer network dynamics .
dynamic monte carlo ( mc ) simulation of the diffusion coefficient of few particles ( ions ) in a rearranging environment of polymer chains is hampered by the need to move every monomer ( polymer bead or ion ) with the same probability .
therefore most of the computational time is spent moving the polymeric host without affecting the ionic configurations . on the other hand ,
earlier studies indicate that important features of the ion diffusion within a dynamical matrix of chain molecules can be described by a more coarse - grained model@xcite .
the idea is to map the diffusion process onto dbp - theory @xcite and to determine the central quantity entering this theory , the renewal time distribution @xmath1 , from the time dependence of the local occupational correlation function due to the polymer chain dynamics . in this communication
we perform tests of such a procedure for a hard - core lattice gas and for tracer diffusion in systems of athermal lattice polymers .
it turns out that the dbp - concept compares favourably with simulations of the complete system dynamics and thereby saves about one order of magnitude in computer time .
in order to explain our procedure we treat the simple case of a hard - core lattice gas , i.e. point particles moving on a lattice with no interaction besides hard core repulsion . the tracer diffusion constant @xmath2 as a function of concentration @xmath3 is known to a high degree of accuracy via dynamic pair approximations @xcite which yield a tracer correlation factor @xmath4{\langle}\cos\theta { \rangle}},\ ] ] with @xmath5 for a simple cubic lattice .
now we consider a lattice with static disorder in which randomly chosen sites are blocked and thus not accessible for the tracer particle .
for this standard percolation problem we denote the mean square displacement of the tracer by @xmath6 .
if on the other hand the blocked sites are globally and instantaneously rearranged according to an arbitrary waiting - time distribution @xmath1 , generalized dbp - theory yields the following diffusivity at zero frequency in @xmath7 dimensions @xcite @xmath8 our aim is to map the complete system of coupled ions and lattice chains onto this coarse - grained dbp - model . while @xmath6 can be obtained in a straightforward manner from simulations of ion diffusion in the frozen network , the determination of @xmath1 requires more explanation . within the spirit of previous work on the hard - core lattice gas we propose to determine @xmath1 from the local occupational correlation function @xmath9 of a site i adjacent to a fixed tracer position
let us introduce the probability @xmath10 that no renewal takes place within the time interval @xmath11 $ ] after a previous renewal at an arbitrary @xmath12 .
the joint probability @xmath13 that the lattice point @xmath14 is occupied at @xmath15 and at @xmath16 ( not necessarily by the same particle ) consists of two distinct contributions .
the first one is the probability that @xmath14 is occupied at @xmath15 and that no renewal occurs until @xmath16 , which is given by @xmath17 .
the second contribution describes the situation where one or more renewals have taken place until @xmath16 .
the corresponding probability is given by @xmath18 .
hence @xmath10 is related to @xmath13 via @xmath19 according to @xcite , @xmath20 where @xmath21 denotes the mean renewal time .
equation ( [ eq:2 ] ) thus can be rewritten as @xmath22 where we obtain @xmath10 from ( [ eq:3 ] ) by means of mc simulations for @xmath23 .
the resulting @xmath10 can be fitted with sufficient accuracy by a combination of @xmath24 exponential functions , @xmath25 on the other hand , @xmath26 can by expressed in terms of the simulated mean square displacement @xmath27 of a tracer particle making @xmath28 steps in a frozen network via @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the attempt frequency of the tracer . inserting ( [ eq:5 ] ) and ( [ eq:6 ] ) into ( [ eq:4 ] ) and carrying out the integration one gets @xmath31 independent calculations for @xmath32 showed that in order to keep the error caused by the finiteness of @xmath33 and @xmath34 below the statistical error , values of @xmath35 and @xmath36 were sufficient .
note that the main decay of @xmath10 is roughly represented by a single exponential with decay rate @xmath37 . in figure ( [ fig:1 ] )
we compare the results of this theory with mc simulations ( see also @xcite ) and the dynamic pair approximation equation ( [ eq:1 ] ) and also with an existing effective medium approximation ( ema ) for a percolating lattice renewing itself with only one rate constant @xmath38 @xcite .
as one can see , using more than one rate constant in the representation of @xmath10 according to ( [ eq:5 ] ) improves the results significantly .
this observation suggests to apply the generalized dbp - theory to the situation described in the next section where the non - exponential character of the renewal process is even more pronounced .
in the case of a hard - core lattice gas the procedure described bears no computational advantage over existing methods but was merely considered as a test case .
the situation changes , however , when we apply our approach to ion diffusion in a polymer network . no analytic approximations for @xmath2 of a quality similar to ( [ eq:1 ] )
are available then , and full simulations of @xmath39 become much more demanding because of the internal degrees of freedom of the host molecules and the larger statistical errors connected with the small concentration of tracer particles .
let us consider , for example , a system where the chains are made of ten beads , assigned to lattice sites , and linearly connected via nearest - neighbour bonds .
apart from site exclusion , which mimics a hard core repulsion , no explicit interactions between beads are assumed .
the size of the simulation box is @xmath40 and periodic boundary conditions in all directions are employed . for the chain dynamics we use the standard algorithm as described in ref .
@xcite , while point - particles individually perform nearest - neighbour hops . to apply our theory we again determine @xmath10 in analogy to the hard - core lattice gas , see ( [ eq:5 ] ) , which is now highly non - exponential , indicating the importance of temporal correlations in the associated renewal processes . a superposition of three exponential functions in ( [ eq:5 ] )
, however , still gives a good description of @xmath10 .
mean - square displacements @xmath27 of ions within a frozen network of chains are determined using @xmath41 steps , and the diffusion constant is calculated as before via equation ( [ eq:7 ] ) . in fig.([fig:2 ] ) we compare our results for the tracer correlation factor as a function of the total concentration of occupied sites , c , with full mc simulations .
due to the connectivity of chains blocking effects at a given @xmath3 on average are reduced and the correlation factor @xmath42 is larger than in the case of point particles , at least as long as @xmath43 .
more important from the computational point of view is the fact that dbp - theory very well agrees with the full simulations , but saves about one order of magnitude in computer time .
mapping that problem onto a coarse - grained dbp - model thus appears to constitute an accurate and efficient method for investigating diffusion through a dynamic host of chain molecules . to support this conclusion further work
is being carried out , in particular under varying chain lengths .
k. nakazato and k. kitahara , progr .
64 * , 2261 ( 1980 ) r. a. tahir kheli and r. j. elliott , phys .
b * 27 * , 844 ( 1983 ) w. dieterich , j. stat .
* 39 * , 583 ( 1985 ) h. j. de bruin and g. e. murch , philos . mag .
* 27 * , 1475 ( 1973 ) r. granek and a. nitzan , j. chem
. phys . * 92 * , 1329 ( 1990 ) p.
h. verdier and w. h. stockmayer , j. chem . phys . *
36 * , 227 ( 1962 ) h. j. hilhorst and j. m. deutch , j. chem .
63 * , 5153 ( 1975 ) k. kremer and k. binder , computer reports * 7 * , 259 ( 1988 ) | polymers carrying electro - negative atoms oxygen or nitrogen act as solvents for salts examples are li - salts dissolved in polyethylene - oxide at above glass - transition temperature polymer - salt solutions show ionic conductivities polymer electrolytes offer applications in batteries sensors fuel cells goal to improve understanding electrical conduction in polymer electrolytes elucidate interplay between ion diffusion polymer network dynamics monte carlo simulation of diffusion of particles in polymer hampered by to computational time spent moving polymeric host without affecting ionic configurations studies indicate important features ion diffusion can be described by coarse - grained model idea is to map diffusion process onto dbp - theory determine central quantity renewal time distribution from time dependence of local occupational correlation function due to polymer chain dynamics tests for hard - core lattice gas tracer diffusion in athermal lattice polymers dbp - concept compares favourably with system dynamics saves computer time treat case of hard - core lattice gas particles moving with no interactiontracer diffusion constant @xmath2 function of concentration @xmath3 known accuracy dynamic pair approximations tracer correlation factor @xmath4 with @xmath5 for cubic lattice lattice static disorder randomly sites blocked not accessible for tracer particle mean square displacement tracer by @xmath6 blocked sites rearranged arbitrary waiting - time distribution @xmath1 dbp - theory yields diffusivity at zero frequency in @xmath7 dimensions @xcite @xmath8 aim map complete system of coupled ions lattice chains dbp - model @xmath6 obtained simulations ion diffusion frozen network determination @xmath1 requires explanation determine @xmath1 from local occupational correlation function @xmath9 site adjacent to fixed tracer position probability @xmath10 no renewal time interval @xmath11 after previous renewal arbitrary @xmath12 joint probability @xmath13 lattice point @xmath14 occupied at @xmath15 @xmath16 two contributions first probability occupied no renewal until @xmath16 given by @xmath17 second contribution more renewals until @xmath16 probability given by @xmath18@xmath10 related to @xmath13 via @xmath19 @xmath21 mean renewal time equation eq:2 rewritten as @xmath22 obtain @xmath10 from eq:3 ] ) mc simulations for @xmath23 resulting @xmath10 fitted by @xmath24 exponential functions @xmath25 @xmath26 expressed simulated mean square displacement @xmath27 of tracer particle making @xmath28 steps in frozen network via @xmath29 @xmath30 attempt frequency tracer inserting ( [ eq:5 ] ) eq:6 ] ) into ( [ eq:4 ] ) integration @xmath31 calculations for @xmath32 error @xmath33 @xmath34 values @xmath35 @xmath36 sufficient main decay of @xmath10 represented by single exponential decay rate @xmath37 figure results with mc simulations dynamic pair approximation equation effective medium approximation for percolating lattice renewing with one rate constant @xmath38 using more than one rate constant @xmath10 improves results generalized dbp - theory situation non - exponential character renewal process pronouncedhard - core lattice gas procedure no computational advantage test case situation changes approach to ion diffusion in polymer network no analytic approximations for @xmath2 eq:1 ] ) available simulations of @xmath39 demanding freedom molecules statistical errors small concentration tracer particles consider system chains ten beads assigned to lattice sites connected via nearest - neighbour bonds no explicit interactions between beads size simulation box is @xmath40 periodic boundary conditions chain dynamics standard algorithm @xcite point - particles perform nearest - neighbour hops theory determine @xmath10 hard - core lattice gas highly non - exponential importance of temporal correlations renewal processes superposition of three exponential functions in ( [ eq:5 ] ) good description of @xmath10 mean - displacements @xmath27 of ions within frozen network chains determined using @xmath41 steps diffusion constant calculated via equation ( [ eq:7 ] ) fig:2 results for tracer correlation factor total concentration occupied sites with full mc simulationsconnectivity chains blocking effects @xmath3 reduced correlation factor @xmath42 larger than point particles @xmath43 dbp - theory agrees simulations saves computer time mapping dbp - model method diffusion chain molecules further work varying chain lengths k. nakazato kitahara 64, 2261 ( 1980 ) tahir kheli r j. elliott phys 27 , 844 ( 1983 ) w. dieterich 39 583 ( 1985 ) h j. de bruin g e. murch philos 27 1475 ( 1973 ) r. granek a. nitzan chem phys 92 1329 ( 1990 ) p h. verdier w h. stockmayer 36 227 ( 1962 ) h j. hilhorst j. m. deutch chem 63 5153 ( 1975 ) k. kremer k. binder computer reports 7 259 ( 1988 ) | 0.318672 | 2,035 | 1,027 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,743 | the standard model of particle interactions is extended to include fermion doublets @xmath0 transforming under the gauge group @xmath1 such that @xmath2 is a dirac scotino ( dark - matter fermion ) , with odd @xmath3 parity .
based on recent cdms data , it is shown how this new dark left - right model ( dlrm2 ) favors a @xmath4 gauge boson at around 1 or 2 tev and be observable at the lhc .
the new @xmath5 gauge bosons may also contribute significantly to lepton - flavor - changing processes such as @xmath6 and @xmath7 conversion in a nucleus or muonic atom .
address = physics and astronomy department , university of california , riverside , california 92521 , usa | if the standard model ( sm ) of particle interactions is extended to accommodate @xmath8 , then the conventional assignment of @xmath9 implies the well - known result that @xmath10 and @xmath11 .
there must then be higgs bidoublets @xmath12 both transforming as @xmath13 , yielding lepton dirac mass terms @xmath14 and similarly in the quark sector .
this results in the appearance of phenomenologically undesirable tree - level flavor - changing neutral currents from higgs exchange , as well as inevitable @xmath15 mixing .
if supersymmetry is imposed , then @xmath16 can be eliminated , but then @xmath17 as well as @xmath18 , contrary to what is observed .
hence the prevalent thinking is that @xmath19 is actually broken down to @xmath20 at a very high scale from an @xmath1 higgs triplet @xmath21 which provides @xmath22 at the same time with a large majorana mass from @xmath23 .
the canonical seesaw mechanism for neutrino mass is thus implemented and everyone should be happy .
but wait , no remnant of the @xmath1 gauge symmetry is detectable at the tev scale and we will not know if @xmath22 really exists .
is there a natural way to lower the @xmath24 breaking scale ?
the answer was already provided 23 years ago @xcite in the context of the superstring - inspired supersymmetric @xmath25 model .
the fundamental fermion representation here is decomposed under @xmath26 $ ] as @xmath27 under its maximum subgroup @xmath28 , the is organized instead as @xmath29 , i.e. @xmath30 it was realized @xcite in 1987 that there are actually two left - right options : ( a ) let @xmath25 break down to the fermion content of the conventional @xmath31 , given by @xmath32 , which is the usual left - right model which everybody knows .
( b ) let @xmath25 break down to the fermion content given by @xmath33 instead , thereby switching the first and third rows of @xmath34 and the first and third columns of @xmath35 .
thus @xmath36 becomes @xmath0 and @xmath37 is not the mass partner of @xmath38 .
this is referred to by the particle data group as the alternative left - right model ( alrm ) . here
the usual left - handed lepton doublet is part of a bidoublet : @xmath39 in this supersymmetric model , @xmath38 is still the dirac mass partner of @xmath22 and gets a seesaw mass , whereas @xcite @xmath37 ( which couples to @xmath40 through @xmath41 ) mixes with the usual neutralinos , the lightest of which is a dark - matter candidate .
two simpler nonsupersymmetric versions of the alrm with @xmath37 as dark matter have recently been proposed @xcite .
we call them dark left - right models ( dlrm and dlrm2 ) .
we impose a global u(1 ) symmetry @xmath42 , so that under @xmath43 , where @xmath44 , a generalized lepton number is conserved , such that @xmath45 in dlrm and @xmath46 in dlrm2 .
the resulting dark - matter fermion @xmath37 has @xmath47 ( majorana ) in dlrm and @xmath48 ( dirac ) in dlrm2 .
this talk is on dlrm2 , with particle content @xcite under @xmath43 given below : @xmath49 as a result , the yukawa terms @xmath50 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 , @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 are allowed , whereas @xmath56 , @xmath57 are forbidden together with the bilinear terms @xmath58 , @xmath59 .
the breaking of @xmath60 leaves @xmath46 unbroken , so that @xmath61 [ @xmath62 has @xmath47 ] , but @xmath64 [ @xmath65 has @xmath66 .
the former contributes to @xmath67 and @xmath68 , whereas the latter means that @xmath38 and @xmath37 are not dirac mass partners and can be completely different particles .
in fact , @xmath69 , @xmath70 come from @xmath71 , and @xmath72 , @xmath73 from @xmath74 .
this structure guarantees the absence of tree - level flavor - changing neutral currents . as
for the gauge bosons and their interactions , let @xmath75 , @xmath76 , @xmath77 , then @xmath78 to avoid @xmath79 mixing at tree level , the condition @xmath80 must be imposed . in that case ,
note that @xmath41 does not mix with @xmath82 because they have different @xmath3 parity . in fig . 1
, the present tevatron bound on @xmath83 is shown for various values of @xmath84 , showing a typical bound of about 1 tev .
vs @xmath83 compared against tevatron data.,scaledwidth=80.0% ]
the usual leptons have @xmath85 as expected , but there are now new particles also with lepton number : @xmath86 have @xmath85 and @xmath87 has @xmath88 as well as @xmath89 .
thus they all have odd @xmath3 parity , i.e. @xmath90 , even though the model is nonsupersymmetric .
the scotino @xmath2 has @xmath48 and thus also odd @xmath3 .
the lightest @xmath2 is a dark - matter candidate , and will be considered below in the context of recent data from the cdms - ii collaboration @xcite .
two possible dark - matter signal events were observed with an expected background of @xmath91 .
the most stringent bound on the elastic spin - independent scattering cross section of @xmath92 occurs at @xmath93 gev , and it is @xmath94 pb . in the dlrm2 , @xmath95 where @xmath96 , @xmath97 , @xmath98 .
let @xmath99 , @xmath100 , then @xmath101 ^ 2 \over a^2}.\ ] ] using @xmath102ge , i.e. @xmath103 and @xmath104 , as an estimate , the cdms bound ( of @xmath94 pb at @xmath93 gev ) implies a bound on @xmath83 . in fig . 2 ,
the resulting lower bounds on @xmath83 from the tevatron search and from cdms are plotted as functions of @xmath84 .
vs @xmath84 from the tevatron search ( red solid line ) and from the cdms search at @xmath93 gev ( blue dashed line ) .
the dotted segments assume a simple extrapolation of the tevatron data.,scaledwidth=80.0% ] to obtain the correct dark - matter relic abundance , the annihilation of @xmath105 sm fermions is considered .
the thermally averaged cross section multiplied by the relative velocity of the annihilating particles is given by @xmath106 where @xmath107 .
fixing the above at 1 pb , the values of @xmath72 and @xmath83 are constrained as a function of @xmath84 . for @xmath93
gev , there is no solution , but if @xmath72 is greater than about 300 gev , solutions exist which are consistent with the tevatron bound as well as the cdms bound . in the range @xmath108 tev , the latter is well approximated by @xmath109 pb ( @xmath72/1 tev)@xmath110 . in fig . 3 , the cases @xmath111 and 600 gev are shown .
( blue dashed line ) and its value ( red solid line ) from @xmath112 pb vs @xmath84 for @xmath113 and 600 gev.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] ( blue dashed line ) and its value ( red solid line ) from @xmath112 pb vs @xmath84 for @xmath113 and 600 gev.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] the @xmath114 annihilation to leptons through @xmath5 exchange also contributes , i.e. @xmath115 but it is subdominant and has been neglected .
at the lhc ( @xmath116 gev ) , @xmath4 may be discovered with 10 dilepton events . using the cuts * @xmath117 gev for each lepton , *
@xmath118 for each lepton , * @xmath119 , the sm background is negligible . with an integrated luminosity of 1 fb@xmath120 ,
the discovery reach of the @xmath4 of the dlrm2 is about 2 tev , as shown in fig .
discovery by 10 dielectron events at lhc .
small circles are tevatron limits.,scaledwidth=80.0% ] to distinguish this @xmath4 from others , the following ratios @xcite may be considered : @xmath121 where @xmath122 . in the conventional left - right model , the numerator for @xmath123
is changed to @xmath124 , i.e. 13.6 larger ( @xmath125 ) . in the alrm ,
the denominator for both is changed to @xmath126 , i.e. 2.6 larger ( @xmath125 ) .
there are also important loop effects @xcite on rare processes from the new interactions @xmath127 , @xmath128 , @xmath129 , @xmath130 , etc .
the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon receives a contribution of order @xmath131 , below the present experimental sensitivity of @xmath132 . the flavor - changing radiative decay @xmath133 has the branching fraction @xmath134 where @xmath135 and @xmath136 it is suppressed by @xmath137 and for @xmath138 tev ( corresponding to @xmath139 tev )
, the current experimental bound of @xmath140 implies @xmath141 for @xmath125 .
a more sensitive probe of the existence of these new interactions is @xmath142 or @xmath7 conversion in a nucleus or muonic atom @xcite .
the reason is that there is an effective @xmath143 vertex from @xmath128 and @xmath129 , given by @xmath144 where @xmath145 , which is not suppressed if @xmath146 is not small , which holds even if the @xmath1 scale is much greater than the electroweak scale .
this unusual ( nondecoupling ) property depends crucially on the @xmath128 vertex , which is not available in other extensions of the sm , including all @xmath147 models .
the current experimental bound of @xmath148 on @xmath149 implies @xmath150 for @xmath125 .
the presence of @xmath22 is unavoidable in a left - right gauge extension of the standard model .
however , it does not have to be the dirac mass partner of @xmath38 . in that case
, it should be renamed @xmath37 and could function as a scotino , i.e. a dark - matter fermion . in the context of the recently proposed new dark left - right model ( dlrm2 ) , latest cdms observations are shown to be consistent with the lightest @xmath2 at about a few hundred gev in mass with the new @xmath4 gauge boson at less than 2 tev .
the latter should then be accessible directly at the lhc , while the @xmath5 gauge bosn may contribute indirectly to enhancing rare lepton - flavor - changing processes such as @xmath142 and @xmath7 conversion in a nucleus or muonic atom .
this work was supported in part by the u. s. department of energy under grant no .
de - fg03 - 94er40837 .
i thank d. delepine and the other organizers of the vi international workshop on the dark side of the universe for their great hospitality and a stimulating meeting in leon .
9 e. ma , phys . rev . *
d36 * , 274 ( 1987 ) .
e. ma , phys . rev . *
d62 * , 093022 ( 2000 ) .
s. khalil , h .- s .
lee , and e. ma , phys . rev . * d79 * , 041701(r ) ( 2009 ) .
s. khalil , h .- s .
lee , and e. ma , phys . rev . *
d81 * , 051702(r ) ( 2010 ) .
z. ahmed _ et al .
_ , science * 327 * , 1619 ( 2010 ) . s. godfrey and t. a. w. martin , phys .
* 101 * , 151803 ( 2008 ) .
m. yamanaka , these proceedings . | standard model particle interactions extended @xmath8 conventional assignment @xmath9 implies @xmath10 @xmath11 higgs bidoublets @xmath12 transforming as @xmath13 yielding lepton dirac mass terms @xmath14 quark sector results undesirable tree - level flavor - changing neutral currents from higgs exchange inevitable @xmath15 mixing supersymmetry imposed @xmath16 eliminated @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 broken down to @xmath20 high scale from higgs triplet @xmath21 provides @xmath22 large majorana mass from @xmath23 seesaw mechanism for neutrino mass implemented no remnant @xmath1 gauge symmetry detectable at tev scale if @xmath22 exists lower @xmath24 breaking scale ? answer provided 23 years ago superstring - inspired supersymmetric @xmath25 model fundamental fermion representation decomposed under @xmath26 @xmath27 maximum subgroup @xmath28 organized as @xmath29 @xmath30 1987 two options let @xmath25 break down to fermion content conventional @xmath31 @xmath32@xmath25 break fermion content @xmath33 switching rows @xmath34 columns @xmath35 @xmath36 becomes @xmath0 @xmath37 not mass partner @xmath38 alternative left - right model left - handed lepton doublet bidoublet @xmath39 supersymmetric @xmath38 dirac mass partner @xmath22 seesaw mass @xmath37 couples @xmath40 @xmath41 mixes with neutralinos lightest dark - matter candidate nonsupersymmetric versions with @xmath37 dark matter proposed dark left - right models dlrm dlrm2 impose global u(1 ) symmetry @xmath42 under @xmath43 @xmath44 generalized lepton number conserved @xmath45 in dlrm @xmath46 in dlrm2 dark - matter fermion @xmath37 has @xmath47 in dlrm @xmath48 dirac in dlrm2 talk on dlrm2 particle content @xcite under @xmath43 @xmath49 yukawa terms @xmath50 @xmath51 allowed forbidden bilinear terms @xmath58 @xmath59breaking @xmath60 leaves @xmath46 unbroken @xmath61 has @xmath47 @xmath64 has @xmath66 former contributes @xmath67 latter means @xmath38 not dirac mass partners different particles @xmath69 @xmath70 from @xmath71 from @xmath74 structure guarantees tree - level flavor - changing neutral currents gauge bosons @xmath75 avoid @xmath79 mixing tree level @xmath80 imposed @xmath41 mix with @xmath82 different @xmath3 parity fig . 1 tevatron bound @xmath83 values @xmath84 typical bound 1 tev data usual leptons have @xmath85 new particles lepton number @xmath86 @xmath85 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 odd @xmath3 parity @xmath90 model nonsupersymmetric scotino @xmath2 has @xmath48 odd @xmath3 lightest @xmath2 dark - matter candidate considered context recent data cdms - ii collaboration @xcite two possible dark - matter signal events observed background @xmath91stringent bound elastic spin - independent scattering cross section @xmath92 @xmath93 gev @xmath94 pb @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath99 @xmath101 @xmath102ge @xmath103 @xmath104 cdms bound @xmath94 pb @xmath93 gev implies bound @xmath83 . 2 lower bounds @xmath83 tevatron cdms functions @xmath84 @xmath84 @xmath93 gev dotted segments assume extrapolation tevatron data correct dark - matter relic abundance annihilation @xmath105 sm fermions considered thermally averaged cross section multiplied by relative velocity annihilating particles @xmath106 @xmath107 1 pb values @xmath72 @xmath83 constrained function @xmath84 @xmath93 gev no solution @xmath72 greater than 300 gev solutions exist consistent with tevatron bound cdms bound range @xmath108 tev latter approximated by @xmath109 pb @xmath72/1 tev@xmath110 fig . 3 cases @xmath111 and 600 gev shownblue dashed line value red solid line @xmath112 pb vs @xmath84 @xmath113 600 gev.=45.0% value red @xmath84 @xmath114 annihilation leptons @xmath5 exchange contributes @xmath115 subdominant neglected lhc @xmath116 gev @xmath4 discovered 10 dilepton events cuts @xmath117 gev @xmath118 @xmath119 sm background negligible integrated luminosity 1 fb@xmath120 discovery reach @xmath4 dlrm2 2 tev fig discovery 10 dielectron events at lhc small circles tevatron limits=80.0% distinguish @xmath4 ratios @xcite @xmath121 @xmath122 numerator @xmath123 changed to @xmath124 13.6 larger @xmath125 ) alrm denominator changed @xmath126 2.6 larger @xmath125 ) important loop effects @xcite rare processes new interactions @xmath127 @xmath128 @xmath129 @xmath130 anomalous magnetic moment muon contribution @xmath131 below experimental @xmath132flavor - changing radiative decay @xmath133 branching fraction @xmath134 suppressed by @xmath137 bound @xmath140 implies @xmath141 for @xmath125 sensitive probe interactions @xmath142 or @xmath7 conversion in nucleus muonic atom effective @xmath143 vertex from @xmath128 @xmath144 not suppressed if @xmath146 small holds @xmath1 scale greater electroweak scale property depends on @xmath128 vertex not available in other extensions @xmath147 models bound @xmath148 on @xmath149 implies @xmath150 for @xmath125 presence @xmath22 unavoidable in left - right gauge extension standard model dirac mass partner of @xmath38 renamed @xmath37 function as scotino dark - matter fermion dark left - right model cdms observations consistent with lightest @xmath2 at hundred gev @xmath4 gauge boson at less than 2 tev latter accessible at lhc @xmath5 gauge bosn may lepton - flavor - changing processes @xmath142 @xmath7 conversion nucleus muonic atom work supported by u. s.department energy grant de - fg03 - 94er40837 thank d delepine organizers vi international workshop dark side universe hospitality stimulating meeting leon e ma phys . rev. d36 274 ( 1987 ) rev d62 093022 ( 2000 ) khalil lee e ma rev d79 041701(r ) ( 2009 ) khalil lee d81 051702(r ) 2010 ) ahmed et al. science 327 *, 1619 ( 2010 ) godfrey w. martin phys . 101 * 151803 ( 2008 ) yamanaka proceedings | 0.430436 | 2,887 | 1,549 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,749 | generalizing the collision term in the relativistic boltzmann equation to include nonlocal effects , and using grad s 14-moment approximation for the single - particle distribution function , we derive evolution equations for the relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics and compare them with the corresponding equations obtained in the standard israel - stewart and related approaches .
significance of this generalization on hydrodynamic evolution is demonstrated in the framework of one - dimensional scaling expansion . * relativistic hydrodynamics from boltzmann equation with modified collision term * + * amaresh jaiswal , rajeev s. bhalerao and subrata pal * + tata institute of fundamental research , mumbai , india | relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics has been quite successful in explaining the spectra and azimuthal anisotropy of particles produced in heavy - ion collisions at the rhic and lhc .
apart from its applications , theoretical formulation of relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics is quite a challenging task by itself .
the first - order dissipative fluid dynamics commonly known as relativistic navier - stokes ( ns ) theory involves parabolic differential equations and suffers from acausality and instability .
the second - order or israel - stewart ( is ) theory @xcite with its hyperbolic equations restores causality but may not guarantee stability .
the correct formulation of relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics is still unresolved and is currently under intense investigation @xcite .
it is essential to note that all formulations of the second - order dissipative hydrodynamics employing the boltzmann equation ( be ) make a strict assumption of locality in the configuration space for the collision term @xcite .
this means , the collisions that increase or decrease the number of particles with a given momentum @xmath0 , in an infinitesimal space - time volume element , are assumed to occur at the same point @xmath1 .
this makes the collision integral a purely local functional of the single - particle phase - space distribution function @xmath2 independent of the derivatives @xmath3 .
although @xmath2 may not vary significantly over the length scale of a single collision event , its variation over the length scales extending over many inter - particle spacings may not be negligible . including the gradients of @xmath2 in the collision term
gives rise to different evolution equations for the dissipative quantities . in this article
, we provide a new formulation of the dissipative hydrodynamic equations within kinetic theory by using a nonlocal collision term in the boltzmann equation : @xmath4 $ ] .
for two - body elastic collisions , the collision term is @xmath5= \frac{1}{2 } \int dp ' dk \ dk ' \
w_{pp ' \to kk ' } ( f_k f_{k ' } \tilde f_p \tilde f_{p ' } - f_p f_{p ' } \tilde f_k \tilde f_{k'}),\ ] ] where @xmath6 is the collisional transition rate , @xmath7 , @xmath8 with @xmath9 for fermi , bose , and boltzmann gas and @xmath10 $ ] .
the first and second terms in eq .
( [ coll ] ) refer to the processes @xmath11 and @xmath12 , respectively .
these processes are traditionally assumed to occur at the same space - time point @xmath1 with an underlying assumption that @xmath2 is constant not only over a region characterizing a single collision , but also over an infinitesimal fluid element of size @xmath13 , large compared to the interparticle separation .
it is important to note that the space - time points at which the above two processes occur may be separated by a small interval @xmath14 within @xmath15 ( see fig .
[ flelmnt ] ) . with this realistic viewpoint , the second term in eq .
( [ coll ] ) involves @xmath16 , which on taylor expansion up to second order in @xmath14 , results in the modified be @xcite @xmath17 + \partial_\mu(a^\mu f ) + \partial_\mu\partial_\nu(b^{\mu\nu}f).\ ] ] and @xmath12 separated by a spacetime interval @xmath14 within an infinitesimal fluid element of size @xmath13 , containing a large number of particles represented by dots . ] the momentum dependence of coefficients , @xmath18 can be made explicit by expressing them in terms of the available tensors @xmath19 and the metric @xmath20 as @xmath21 and @xmath22 .
the scalar coefficients @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 are functions of @xmath1 .
the conserved particle current , @xmath26 , and the energy - momentum tensor , @xmath27 have the standard form @xcite : @xmath28 conservation of current , @xmath29 and energy - momentum tensor , @xmath30 , yield the fundamental evolution equations for @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 @xmath34 conservation of current and energy - momentum implies vanishing zeroth and first moments of the collision term @xmath35 $ ] leading to three constraint equations for the coefficients ( @xmath36 ) @xcite , @xmath37 in order to obtain the second - order evolution equations for dissipative quantities , we consider second moment of the modified be , eq .
( [ mbe ] ) @xmath38 + p^\gamma \partial_\gamma(af ) + \partial^2(b_1f_0 ) + ( p \cdot \partial)^2 ( b_2f_0 ) \big].\ ] ] using grad s 14-moment approximation for the single particle distribution function in orthogonal basis , @xmath39 we finally obtain the following evolution equations for the dissipative fluxes @xmath40 in the usual notation @xcite .
the 8 terms " ( `` 9 terms '' ) involve second - order , linear scalar ( vector ) combinations of derivatives of @xmath41 .
we observe that in the above equations , the nonlocal coefficients ( @xmath42 ) modify the standard ns as well as the is terms .
this method is also able to generate all possible second - order terms allowed by symmetry . )
normalized to their initial values ( left panel ) , and anisotropy parameter @xmath43 ( right panel ) .
initial values are @xmath44 fm / c , @xmath45 mev , @xmath46 , @xmath47.,width=340,height=226 ]
to illustrate the numerical significance of the non - locality in the collision term through the new dissipative hydrodynamic equations derived here , we consider bjorken evolution of a massless boltzmann gas ( @xmath48 ) at vanishing net baryon number density @xcite . in terms of the coordinates ( @xmath49 ) where @xmath50 and @xmath51 , the initial four - velocity becomes @xmath52 .
in this scenario @xmath53 and the equation for @xmath54 reduces to @xmath55 where the coefficients are @xmath56 the coupled differential equations ( [ evol ] ) , ( [ param ] ) and ( [ bjpi ] ) are solved simultaneously for a variety of initial conditions relevant for rhic and lhc .
figure [ evolu ] ( left panel ) , shows the evolution of several quantities for a particular choice of initial conditions .
@xmath57 decreases monotonically to the crossover temperature @xmath58 mev at time @xmath59 fm / c .
parameters @xmath24 , @xmath25 vary smoothly to zero at large times indicating reduced but still significant presence of nonlocal effects at late times .
this is also evident in fig .
[ evolu ] ( right panel ) , where the pressure anisotropy @xmath60 shows marked deviation from is .
although the shear pressure @xmath61 vanishes rapidly indicating approach to ideal fluid dynamics , the @xmath43 is far from unity .
faster isotropization for initial @xmath62 may be attributed to a smaller effective shear viscosity in the modified ns equation .
figure [ evol2 ] shows the evolution of @xmath43 for isotropic initial pressure configuration , at various @xmath63 for the lhc energy regime . with small initial corrections ( @xmath64% to ns and @xmath65% to the is terms ) due to @xmath66 , nonlocal hydrodynamics ( solid lines ) exhibits appreciable deviation from the ( local ) is theory ( dashed lines ) .
the above results clearly demonstrate the importance of the nonlocal effects , which should be incorporated in transport calculations as well .
in is ( dashed lines ) and the present work ( solid lines ) for isotropic initial pressure configuration.,width=283,height=219 ]
to summarize , we have derived viscous hydrodynamic equations by introducing a nonlocal generalization of the collision term in the boltzmann equation .
the navier - stokes as well as israel - stewart equations are modified and new terms are obtained in the evolution equations of the dissipative quantities .
the method presented is able to generate all possible terms that are allowed by symmetry . within one - dimensional scaling expansion ,
we find that nonlocality of the collision term has a rather strong influence on the evolution of the viscous medium via hydrodynamic equations . 50 h. song et .
al . , phys .
lett . * 106 * , 192301 ( 2011 ) .
w. israel and j. m. stewart , annals phys . * 118 * , 341 ( 1979 ) .
g. s. denicol , t. koide and d. h. rischke , phys .
lett . * 105 * , 162501 ( 2010 ) .
a. jaiswal , r. s. bhalerao and s. pal , phys .
b * 720 * , 347 ( 2013 ) j. d. bjorken , phys .
d * 27 * , 140 ( 1983 ) . | relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics successful explaining spectra azimuthal anisotropy of particles in heavy - ion collisions at rhic lhc theoretical formulation challenging first - order dissipative fluid dynamics relativistic navier - stokes theory involves parabolic differential equations acausality instability second - order israel - stewart theory hyperbolic equations restores causality guarantee stability correct formulation unresolved under investigation formulations second - order hydrodynamics boltzmann equation make assumption of locality in configuration space for collision term collisions increase decrease number particles with momentum assumed to occur at same point makes collision integral purely local functional of single - particle phase - space distribution function @xmath2 independent of derivatives @xmath3 vary over length scale single collision event variation over inter - particle spacings not negligible gradients of @xmath2 in collision term different evolution equations for dissipative quantities new formulation hydrodynamic equations nonlocal collision term in boltzmann equationtwo - body elastic collisions term @xmath5= \frac{1}{2 } dp ' dk w_{pp ' kk f_k f_{k ' } \tilde f_p f_{p f_p f_{p f_k f_{k' @xmath6 collisional transition rate @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 fermi bose boltzmann gas @xmath10 first second terms refer processes @xmath11 @xmath12 processes assumed same space - time point @xmath1 @xmath2 constant single collision infinitesimal fluid element @xmath13 interparticle separation space - time points processes separated small interval @xmath14 @xmath15 fig second term involves @xmath16 expansion second order @xmath14 results modified @xcite @xmath17 + \partial_\mu(a^\mu f ) + __\nu(b^{\mu\nu}f). @xmath12 separated by spacetime interval @xmath14 infinitesimal fluid element @xmath13 large number particles represented dotsmomentum dependence of coefficients @xmath18 tensors @xmath19 metric @xmath20 @xmath21 scalar coefficients @xmath23 functions of @xmath1 conserved particle current @xmath26 energy - momentum tensor @xmath27 standard form @xmath28 conservation of current energy - momentum tensor yield evolution equations for @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 conservation current energy - momentum implies vanishing zeroth first moments collision term @xmath35 three constraint equations for coefficients @xmath36 @xmath37 second - order evolution equations for dissipative quantities consider second moment of modified @xmath38 + p\gamma\partial^2 s 14-moment approximation for single particle distribution function @xmath39 evolution equations for dissipative fluxes @xmath40 usual notation 8 terms involve second - order linear scalar combinations of derivatives of @xmath41 nonlocal coefficients @xmath42 ) modify standard ns terms method second - order terms allowed by symmetrynormalized initial values left anisotropy parameter @xmath43 right initial values @xmath44 fm / c mev numerical significance non - locality collision term dissipative hydrodynamic equations evolution massless boltzmann gas @xmath48 vanishing net baryon density @xcite coordinates @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 initial four - velocity becomes @xmath52 @xmath53 equation @xmath54 reduces to @xmath55 coefficients @xmath56 coupled differential equations evol param bjpi solved initial conditions rhic lhc figure shows evolution quantities initial conditions @xmath57 decreases to crossover temperature @xmath58 mev @xmath59 fm / c parameters @xmath24 @xmath25 vary to zero large times reduced nonlocal effects late times fig right pressure anisotropy @xmath60 deviation shear pressure @xmath61 vanishes ideal fluid dynamics @xmath43 far from unity faster isotropization @xmath62 smaller effective shear viscosity modified ns equation figure evol2 shows evolution @xmath43 isotropic initial pressure configuration @xmath63 lhc energy regimesmall corrections @xmath64% to ns @xmath65% is terms due to @xmath66 nonlocal hydrodynamics solid lines deviation from local theory dashed lines results demonstrate importance nonlocal effects in transport calculations lines work solid lines isotropic initial pressure configuration derived viscous hydrodynamic equations nonlocal generalization collision term in boltzmann equation navier - stokes israel - stewart equations modified new terms obtained evolution equations dissipative quantities method terms allowed by symmetry nonlocality collision term evolution viscous medium hydrodynamic equations h. song al . phys . lett 106 192301 ( 2011 ) w. israel m. stewart annals phys 118 341 ( 1979 ) denicol t. koide h. rischke phys 105 162501 ( 2010 ) jaiswal. bhalerao s. pal phys 720 347 ( 2013 ) bjorken phys 27 140 ( 1983 ) | 0.315763 | 2,036 | 1,044 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,757 | we have compared the kinematics and metallicity of the main sequence binary and single f stars from the _ hipparcos _ catalog to see if the populations of these stars originate from the same statistical ensemble .
the velocity dispersions of the known unresolved binary f stars have been found to be dramatically smaller than those of the single f stars .
this suggests that the population of these binaries is , in fact , younger than that of the single stars , which is further supported by the difference in metal abundance : the binaries turn out to be , on average , more metal rich than the single stars .
so , we conclude that the population of these binaries is indeed _ younger _ than that of the single f stars .
comparison of the single f stars with the c binaries ( binary candidates identified in suchkov & mcmaster 1999 ) has shown , on the other hand , that the latter stars are , on average , _ older _ than the single f stars .
we suggest that the age difference between the single f stars , known unresolved binaries , and c binaries is associated with the fact that stellar evolution in a binary systems depends on the binary components mass ratio and separation , with these parameters being statistically very different for the known binaries and c binaries ( e.g. , mostly substellar secondaries in c binaries versus stellar secondaries in known binaries ) .
in general we conclude that the populations of known binaries , c binaries , and single f stars do not belong to the same statistical ensemble .
the implications of the discovered age difference between these populations along with the corresponding differences in kinematics and metallicity should be important not only for understanding the evolution of stars but also for the history of star formation and the evolution of the local galactic disk . | binaries are believed to constitute a significant fraction of the local stellar population ( e.g. , duquennoy a. & mayor 1991 , suchkov & mcmaster 1999 ) .
because of that they contribute substantially to the statistics of age , metallicity , and kinematics of the main sequence stars in the solar neighborhood
. since the evolution of the local galactic disk is deduced mostly from these statistics ( e.g. , twarog 1980 , carlberg et al .
1985 , marsakov et al .
1990 , meusinger et al .
1991 , edvardsson et al . 1993 ,
caloi et al . 1999 ) , the presence of binaries may affect inferences regarding the history of star formation and metal enrichment in the disk if the population of these stars is statistically different from that of the single stars . in this paper
we compare the kinematics and metallicity of binary and single f stars to see if they belong to the same statistical ensemble .
we use a sample of the _ hipparcos _ f stars ( @xmath0 ) that have photometry in hauck & mermilliod ( 1998 ) , and treat separately the stars marked in _
hipparcos _ as single stars , unresolved binaries , and resolved binaries .
the latter two groups of stars will be referred to as _ known _ binaries to differentiate them from the binary candidates ( c binaries ) discussed below .
all the stars have tangential velocity obtained from the _ hipparcos _ parallax and proper motion . about a third of them have also radial velocities ( taken mostly from ochsenbein f. 1980 , barbier - brossat et al .
1994 , and duflot et al .
1995 ) , which have been used to compute total spatial velocity .
metallicity has been derived from the data using the metallicity calibration from carlberg et al .
effective temperature , @xmath1 , has been computed from the @xmath2 color , with the algorithm based on moon ( 1985 ) , moon & dworetsky ( 1985 ) .
the sample is constrained to the stars within 200 pc , metallicity range @xmath3}$}\ } < 0.5 $ ] , magnitude accuracy better then 0.003 ( in @xmath4 ) , parallax accuracy better than 3 mas , and proper motion accuracy better than 3 mas in both coordinates .
many of the nearby single stars are in fact yet unidentified binaries ( e.g. , duquennoy & mayor 1991 ) .
numerous binary candidates , called c binaries , were identified in suchkov & mcmaster ( 1999 ) .
the criterion used to isolate c binaries involves the difference between the star s absolute magnitude derived from the _ hipparcos _ parallax and the johnson @xmath4 magnitude , @xmath5 , and the absolute magnitude computed from the dereddened color index @xmath6 , @xmath7 ( the computation of @xmath7 utilizes the algorithm based on moon 1985 , moon & dworetsky 1985 ) .
the discrepancy between the two magnitudes , @xmath8 ( @xmath5 too bright for the star s @xmath9 ) , appears to be a strong signature of a binary system .
so , to reduce the contamination in the sample of the single stars with binaries , we have excluded the stars with @xmath10 ( c binaries at the 3-@xmath11 level ) from that sample .
the same rejection criterion has been applied to the sample of the binary stars to avoid any differential bias .
the anomalously bright `` single '' stars , @xmath10 , have been isolated into a sample of c binaries .
a summary of kinematics and metallicity of all groups of stars considered here is given in table 1 .
lcccr + sample & @xmath12 & @xmath11 & [ fe / h ] & n + & ( mag ) & ( ) & ( @xmath13 ) & + & + single & @xmath14 & 17.1 @xmath15 0.2 & @xmath16 & 6482 + binary & @xmath14 & 15.2 @xmath15 0.4 & @xmath17 & 591 + `` single '' & @xmath18 & 19.7 @xmath15 0.3 & @xmath19 & 1581 + binary & @xmath18 & 17.0 @xmath15 0.5 & @xmath20 & 641 + & + single & @xmath14 & 22.0 @xmath15 0.4 & @xmath21 & 1414 + binary & @xmath14 & 15.9 @xmath15 0.9 & @xmath22 & 147 + `` single '' & @xmath18 & 23.4 @xmath15 0.9 & @xmath23 & 332 + binary & @xmath18 & 17.0 @xmath15 0.8 & @xmath24 & 203 +
figure [ fig - knm ] compares tangential velocity dispersion of the single f stars , known unresolved binaries , and c binaries , revealing a dramatic difference between the three populations .
first , the known binary f stars have significantly smaller velocity dispersions at all distances from the sun .
the latter fact rules out a possible selection bias against distant binaries as a cause of the kinematic differences between the three populations . as seen in table 1 ,
the difference in spatial velocity dispersion is even more dramatic .
we have checked if the sample color selection criterion , @xmath25 , introduces a bias favoring hotter binaries and/or cooler single stars , which could make the sample binary stars younger just because of different age sampling at different effective temperatures . such a bias can arise if , for whatever reasons , binaries are hotter than single stars at the same @xmath26 color
. if this is the case , the relationship between the effective temperature , @xmath27 ( derived from spectroscopic analysis ) , and @xmath26 must be different for the binaries and the single stars .
this is tested in figure [ fig - tef ] , where @xmath27 is from cayrel de strobel et al .
comparison of the upper and lower panels shows that within the uncertainties the two relationships are identical , which rules out any age bias associated with the color selection criterion . among other
known selection effects none was found to introduce a bias favoring low - velocity binary stars .
so , the kinematic discrepancy between the known binaries and the single stars in figure [ fig - knm ] must be intrinsic . for the stellar populations in the solar neighborhood
, smaller velocity dispersion implies younger age .
therefore , the above result means that the known binary f stars are , on average , younger than single f stars .
this conclusion is further supported by the respective discrepancy in the mean metallicity of the two populations .
figure [ fig - feh ] shows that the binary stars are , on average , more metal rich , implying that they are statistically younger than single stars . as with the kinematics ,
the difference in metallicity is present at all distances , and none of the known selection effects was found to introduce a bias favoring metal rich binary stars .
this argues that the metallicity difference and the corresponding age discrepancy between the known binaries and the single stars are real .
if the population of known binaries is indeed younger than that of single f stars , the questions is : why ?
an obvious place to look for an answer is the interaction of the binary components .
depending on separation , the components of close binaries can strongly interact with each other , including mass loss and/or mass transfer , which drastically changes their evolution .
the interaction effects are believed to make the cm diagrams of star clusters look much different from what is expected on the basis of the standard stellar evolution theory as applied to a coeval population of single stars ( see , e.g. , pols & marinus 1994 , and references therein ) .
so , it would be natural to associate the younger , on average , age of the binary f stars with the interaction of binary components in tight pairs , which somehow reduces the main sequence lifetime of the primary component .
this hypothesis is supported by figure [ fig - i1i2mh ] , which provides evidence that component separation is relevant to how long the primary star may live on the ms .
figure [ fig - i1i2mh ] compares the velocity dispersions of the spatially resolved binary f stars ( in fact , these are the binary components having individual entries in the _ hipparcos _ catalog ) with those of the unresolved double stars .
statistically , the spatially resolved binary pairs have obviously wider separations than the unresolved binaries . therefore ,
if there is any impact of component interaction on stellar evolution , it must be less significant among the resolved binaries , so the populations of resolved and unresolved binaries must exhibit statistical differences arising from different stellar evolution in wide and tight binary pairs .
figure [ fig - i1i2mh ] shows that this is indeed the case .
the kinematics of the unresolved binaries turns out to be younger ( smaller velocity dispersion ) than that of the resolved binaries at any distance from the sun , indicating that binary pairs with smaller component have shorter lifetimes .
a crude estimate of the age difference between the binary and single f stars can be obtained using age
velocity relation ( avr ) . to illustrate this , we have derived the avr for the subsample of f stars constrained to the range of @xmath12 shown by the best known single stars within 25 pc , @xmath28 , and metallicity range @xmath29}$}\ } \leq 0.01 $ ] .
the isochrones for isochrone fitting are from demarque et al .
1996 , for the composition matching the metallicity range of the selected stars : @xmath30 , @xmath31 .
this avr is shown in figure [ fig - avr ] .
the slope of the linear regression in figure [ fig - avr ] indicates that a 1 difference in tangential velocity dispersion , @xmath32 , corresponds to a @xmath33 gyr difference in average age .
the unresolved binaries have @xmath32 about @xmath34 smaller than @xmath32 of the single stars ( table 1 ) , which means that they are statistically _ younger _ by at least @xmath35 gyr .
in contrast to the known binaries , the c binaries turn out to be kinematically _ older _ than the single f stars . one can infer this from figure [ fig - knm ] and table 1 , where higher velocity dispersions of the c binaries indicate older age . from the slope of the avr in figure [ fig - avr ] and the average difference in tangential velocity dispersions of @xmath35 ( table 1 )
, we conclude , that the age difference between the two population is @xmath35 gyr .
there is evidence that the older age of c binaries is associated with retarded stellar evolution of a primary f star in a binary system , with @xmath12 being a measure of retardation ( suchkov 1999 ) ; the retardation probably results from component interaction in tight binary pairs , which is suggested by a strong correlation between @xmath12 and binary components separation found for known binaries .
however , if c binaries are double star systems similar to known binaries , the question is , why they evolve differently .
we believe that the solution to this puzzle will eventually be found in the details of interaction in tight binary pairs
. the outcome of the binary components interaction in terms of its impact on stellar evolution should depend on the combination of the binary system parameters , such as the component mass ratio , separation , orbit eccentricity , etc .
it seems plausible that depending on that combination , the interaction of binary components can alter the standard evolution of the main sequence primary either by affecting the hydrogen - burning core and prolonging the star s main sequence lifetime , as implied in some scenarios of blue straggler formation ( cf .
wheeler 1979 ; see also livio 1991 ) , or by various mass loss / transfer events that interrupt the normal main sequence evolution ( e.g. , pols & marinus 1994 ) or both .
the old age of c binaries suggests that the former mechanism statistically dominates the evolution of these stars .
one can speculate that this is because the secondary in many of these systems is probably too small ( substellar ) to evoke appreciable mass loss / transfer but is very close to the primary to tidally induce instabilities leading to enhanced internal mixing , which provides a fresh supply of hydrogen to the core .
in the case of known binaries , both components are stellar , so both of the above mechanisms can operate in these systems .
this means that although stellar evolution in a tight pair can be slower , the primary can prematurely cease to exist as a main sequence f star because of a strong mass loss occurring at some point in the evolution of the binary .
in fact , the latter scenario predicts that the known binaries with far evolved primaries should be , on average , older than expected from the standard stellar evolution models .
this prediction can be verified by comparing velocity dispersions of binaries with different @xmath12 . as mentioned above
, @xmath12 appears to provide a measure of stellar evolution retardation .
the larger @xmath12 the larger amount of extra time spent by the star on the main sequence , so the stars with large @xmath12 must be statistically older than those with small @xmath12 .
this seems to be indeed the case .
based on the age
velocity relation in figure [ fig - avr ] , the difference in tangential velocity dispersion of @xmath36 between the two groups of known binaries ( see table 1 ) implies that those with a strong signature of retardation , @xmath10 , are older ( statistically ) by @xmath35 gyr , this discrepancy is an indicator that such a primary evolves at a much slower pace than expected , so the standard isochrones underestimate its age . ] . in summary
, we conclude that the populations of binary and single f stars do not belong to the same statistical ensemble .
the main difference is in the mean age of the populations , which has important implications for the modeling of both stellar evolution and galactic evolution . | binaries constitute significant fraction local stellar population duquennoy mayor 1991 suchkov mcmaster 1999 contribute to statistics age metallicity kinematics main sequence stars solar neighborhood evolution local galactic disk deduced from statistics twarog 1980 carlberg 1985 marsakov 1990 meusinger 1991 edvardsson 1993 caloi 1999 presence binaries may affect inferences history star formation metal enrichment if population different from single stars paper compare kinematics metallicity of binary single f stars use sample _ hipparcos _ f stars @xmath0 photometry in hauck & mermilliod 1998 ) treat stars marked in _ hipparcos as single stars unresolved binaries resolved binaries latter two groups stars referred to as _ known _ binaries binary candidates stars have tangential velocity from hipparcos _ parallax proper motion third have radial velocities ochsenbein 1980 barbier - brossat 1994 duflot 1995 compute total spatial velocity metallicity derived from data calibration carlberg et al .temperature @xmath1 computed from @xmath2 color algorithm based on moon dworetsky 1985 sample constrained to stars within 200 pc metallicity range @xmath3 < 0.5 $ magnitude accuracy better then 0.003 parallax accuracy than 3 mas motion accuracy than 3 mas nearby single stars unidentified binaries duquennoy & mayor 1991 binary candidates c binaries identified in suchkov & mcmaster 1999 criterion c binaries difference between star s absolute magnitude from hipparcos parallax johnson @xmath4 magnitude @xmath5 absolute magnitude computed from dereddened color index @xmath6 @xmath7 moon dworetsky 1985 discrepancy between magnitudes @xmath8 @xmath5 too bright for signature of binary system excluded stars with @xmath10 c binaries at@xmath11 level same rejection criterion applied to binary stars avoid differential bias anomalously bright stars @xmath10 isolated into sample of c binaries summary of kinematics metallicity of all groups stars in table 1 lcccr sample @xmath12 @xmath11 fe / h ] n + mag ) @xmath13 ) single @xmath14 17.1 0.2 @xmath16 6482 + binary 15.2 0.4 591 + single @xmath18 19.7 0.3 1581 + binary 17.0 0.5 @xmath20 641 + single @xmath14 22.0 0.4 @xmath21 1414 + binary 15.9 0.9 @xmath22 147 + single @xmath18 23.4 0.9 @xmath23 & 332 + binary 17.0 0.8 @xmath24 & 203 figure - compares tangential velocity dispersion single f stars unresolved binaries c binaries dramatic difference populations known binary f stars smaller velocity dispersions distances from sun rules out selection bias against distant binaries table 1 difference spatial velocity dispersion dramatic checked sample color selection criterion @xmath25 bias favoring hotter binaries cooler single stars binary stars younger bias can arise binaries hotter than single stars same @xmath26 colorrelationship between effective temperature @xmath27 @xmath26 different for binaries single stars tested in figure [ fig - tef ] @xmath27 from cayrel de strobel et al comparison upper lower panels shows two relationships identical rules out age bias color selection known selection effects none bias favoring low - velocity binary stars kinematic discrepancy between binaries single stars in figure [ fig - knm ] be intrinsic smaller velocity dispersion implies younger age result means known binary f stars average younger than single f stars supported by discrepancy in mean metallicity populations figure [ fig - feh ] shows binary stars more metal rich statistically younger than single stars difference in metallicity present at all distances none known selection effects bias favoring metal rich binary stars metallicity difference age discrepancy between binaries single stars real if population of known binaries younger than single f stars why ? answer interaction of binary components components binaries can interact mass loss transfer changes evolutioninteraction effects make cm diagrams star clusters different from standard stellar evolution theory coeval population single stars see pols & marinus 1994 associate younger age of binary f stars with interaction binary components in tight pairs reduces main sequence lifetime of primary component hypothesis supported by figure - i1i2mh ] component separation relevant to primary star compares velocity dispersions of spatially resolved binary f stars with unresolved double stars spatially resolved binary pairs have wider separations than unresolved if impact of component interaction on stellar evolution less significant among resolved binaries populations of resolved and unresolved binaries must exhibit statistical differences from different stellar evolution in wide and tight binary pairs figure shows unresolved binaries younger ( smaller velocity dispersion ) than resolved binaries at distance from sun binary pairs with smaller component have shorter lifetimes estimate of age difference between binary and single f stars using age velocity relation (derived avr for subsample f stars to range @xmath12 single stars within 25 pc @xmath28 metallicity range @xmath29 0.01 isochrones from demarque et al . 1996 composition matching metallicity range selected stars @xmath30 @xmath31 avr shown in figure fig - slope linear regression indicates 1 difference in tangential velocity dispersion @xmath32 corresponds to @xmath33 gyr difference in average age unresolved binaries have @xmath32 @xmath34 smaller than @xmath32 single stars statistically younger by least @xmath35 gyr c binaries kinematically older than single f stars higher velocity dispersions c binaries indicate older age slope avr average difference tangential velocity dispersions @xmath35 age difference is @xmath35 gyr evidence older age of c binaries with retarded stellar evolution primary f star binary system @xmath12 measure of retardation retardation results from component interaction in tight binary pairs strong correlation between @xmath12 binary components separation if c binaries double star systems similar binaries question why evolve differentlysolution puzzle in details interaction tight binary pairs outcome impact on stellar evolution on binary system parameters component mass ratio separation orbit eccentricity plausible interaction binary components can alter evolution main sequence primary affecting hydrogen - burning core prolonging star s main sequence lifetime wheeler 1979 livio 1991 or mass loss / transfer events interrupt normal main sequence evolution pols & marinus 1994 or both old age c binaries suggests former mechanism dominates evolution speculate because secondary too small ( substellar to evoke mass loss / transfer close to primary to induce instabilities enhanced internal mixing fresh supply hydrogen to core in known binaries both components are stellar both mechanisms can operate stellar evolution in tight pair can slower primary can prematurely cease to exist as main sequence star strong mass loss binary latter scenario predicts known binaries with far evolved primaries be older than expected from standard stellar evolution models verified by comparing velocity dispersions of binaries with different @xmath12 @xmath12 stellar evolution retardationlarger @xmath12 larger extra time spent star on main sequence stars with large @xmath12 statistically older small @xmath12 age velocity relation in figure difference in tangential velocity dispersion of @xmath36 between two groups binaries implies with strong signature retardation @xmath10 older by @xmath35 gyr discrepancy primary evolves slower pace standard isochrones underestimate age populations of binary and single f stars belong same statistical ensemble main difference in mean age populations implications for modeling stellar evolution and galactic evolution | 0.501942 | 3,113 | 1,543 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,760 | first results are presented from @xmath0 and @xmath1 measurements by the phenix experiment at rhic .
these results are from a preliminary analysis of dielectrons from @xmath2 and @xmath3 data and dimuons from @xmath3 data measured in the rhic run 2 .
a total cross section for @xmath4 production in @xmath5 @xmath3 collisions of @xmath6 ( stat ) @xmath7 ( sys ) @xmath8b is found .
the @xmath0 yield is presented versus number of binary collisions . | interesting results obtained at the cern sps @xcite have heightened theoretical interest in @xmath4 production in relativistic heavy ion collisions . a new generation of models has appeared in which both dissociation and recombination of @xmath9 pairs play a significant role .
there are now model predictions for rhic central collisions ranging from the almost complete disappearance of @xmath4 @xcite , to @xmath4 enhancement @xcite .
in this paper we present the first results from phenix on @xmath4 production at rhic .
phenix @xcite detects electrons in the pseudo - rapidity range @xmath10 , and muons in the range @xmath11 . in the central arms ,
electrons are identified by matching charged particle tracks to energy deposits in the electromagnetic calorimeter and rings in the ring imaging cherenkov detector . in the muon arms ,
muon candidates are found by identifying roads in the muon identifier , and matching them to tracks found in the muon tracker . during the 2001/2002 rhic run , phenix recorded data from both @xmath2 and @xmath3 collisions . only the south muon arm was operational during that run .
[ [ pp ] ] pp ~~ data from @xmath3 collisions were recorded for an integrated luminosity of 150 @xmath12 .
the minimum bias interaction trigger for the present analysis was the beam - beam counter ( bbc ) , with at least one hit per arm .
interaction rates for @xmath3 varied from about 5 @xmath13 to 30 @xmath13 .
@xmath4 events were selected using level-1 triggers @xcite in coincidence with the minimum bias interaction trigger . the @xmath14 trigger used in this analysis ( about half of our @xmath3 data sample ) required that at least 700 mev be deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter .
the @xmath15 trigger required at least one deep muon and one shallow muon in the muon identifier .
the level-1 triggers allowed all @xmath4 events to be recorded at the highest interaction rates .
after vertex cuts ( @xmath16 35 cm for @xmath17 and @xmath16 38 cm for @xmath18 ) and selection of good runs , about @xmath19 events were sampled for @xmath17 and @xmath20 events were sampled for @xmath18 .
the muon arm data were subdivided into two rapidity bins .
detector acceptance , level-1 trigger efficiency , and detector efficiency were estimated for a typical run using simulations of single @xmath4 decays with a realistic detector response .
an average correction for run - to - run variations in detector active area was then determined from the azimuthal distribution of electrons / event for all runs used in the analysis . for the @xmath17 case , two models of the transverse momentum distribution and a range of values for the mean p@xmath21 were used to establish the systematic uncertainty in the acceptance .
this was necessary because the p@xmath21 distribution is not well defined by the data due to low statistics .
this systematic uncertainty was estimated to be 10% . for both the @xmath17 and @xmath18 cases ,
pythia simulations were used to estimate the bbc trigger efficiency for inelastic @xmath3 events ( needed to calculate the total number of events ) , and to estimate the fraction of events containing a @xmath4 that fired the bbc trigger ( ie . the bbc trigger efficiency for @xmath4 detection ) . for cross section calculations ,
the rhic luminosity was assumed to have a systematic uncertainty of 20% in this preliminary analysis .
this uncertainty is expected to be reduced considerably with more study .
systematic errors were added in quadrature to produce an overall systematic uncertainty of 35% for @xmath22 and 29% for @xmath23 cross section data .
data from @xmath2 collisions were recorded for an integrated luminosity of 24 @xmath24 .
the minimum bias trigger used for @xmath2 collisions was a coincidence between the bbc ( 2 hits per arm ) and the zero degree calorimeter ( zdc ) . at the highest luminosities , where only a fraction of the interactions could be recorded ,
level-2 triggers @xcite were used to select @xmath4 events and minimum bias triggers were allocated only @xmath25 20% of the data bandwidth .
interaction rates varied from about 100 @xmath26 to 1600 @xmath26 . at the end of the @xmath2 run ,
the data samples from minimum bias triggers and level-2 triggers were approximately equal . in the present preliminary analysis of the @xmath2 data ,
only the @xmath0 data have been analyzed , and only minimum bias triggers were used . after applying a vertex cut of @xmath27 cm and selecting good runs , @xmath25 26 million events were analyzed .
yields were extracted using 7 different procedures for yield and background estimation , to establish the systematic errors .
the acceptance and detector efficiency were estimated using simulations of single @xmath4 decays with a realistic detector response .
the minimum bias trigger is estimated @xcite to have unit efficiency for the most central 90% of interactions used in this analysis .
the event centrality was estimated @xcite using the combined data from the bbc and zdc detectors .
the data were separated into three centrality bins .
the centrality dependence of the efficiency for offline @xmath4 reconstruction was estimated by embedding simulated single electrons into measured events and then taking the square of the single electron reconstruction efficiency as the @xmath4 reconstruction efficiency due to occupancy . combining systematic errors quadratically produced an overall systematic uncertainty per centrality bin of 26% ( 0 - 20% ) 27%(20 - 40% ) and 26%(40 - 90% ) .
the dielectron invariant mass spectrum from @xmath2 ( minimum bias ) is shown in fig . 1 , and that from @xmath3 is shown in fig .
3 shows the @xmath3 dimuon invariant mass spectrum .
invariant mass spectrum ( points ) , with unlike - sign pair background ( histogram).,scaledwidth=100.0% ] invariant mass spectrum ( points ) , with unlike - sign pair background ( histogram).,scaledwidth=100.0% ] invariant mass spectrum ( points ) , with unlike - sign pair background ( histogram).,scaledwidth=100.0% ] + the @xmath4 rapidity distribution was obtained by combining the data from the @xmath17 and @xmath18 channels , and is shown in fig .
the total cross section was obtained by fitting both a gaussian and the pythia prediction for the shape of the rapidity distribution , using the parton distribution function grv94lo .
both gave essentially the same integral , and the average of the two results for the total cross section is 3.8 @xmath16 0.6 ( stat ) @xmath16 1.3 ( sys ) @xmath8b .
this value agrees well with the prediction of the color evaporation model @xcite .
branching ratio times dn / dy scaled by n@xmath28 .
the flat line is the best fit binary scaling value .
the curve is a normal nuclear absorption model calculation @xcite.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] branching ratio times dn / dy scaled by n@xmath28 .
the flat line is the best fit binary scaling value .
the curve is a normal nuclear absorption model calculation @xcite.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] the @xmath0 yield versus the number of participants ( n@xmath29 ) is shown in fig . 5 for the @xmath3 data and for the @xmath2 data divided into three centrality bins .
rather limited conclusions can be drawn from the data in fig . 5 because of the large statistical and systematic uncertainties associated with this preliminary analysis .
we have fitted a flat line to the data to see if the data are consistent with binary scaling . the best fit , shown in fig . 5 , has a confidence level of 16% based on the statistical uncertainties alone .
thus the binary scaled @xmath4 yields probably trend down with increasing n@xmath29 , but that is not a strong statement .
we also show in fig .
5 a comparison of the n@xmath29 dependence with a calculation from a simple normal nuclear absorption model assuming a 7.1 mb absorption cross section @xcite . here the confidence level is found to be 80% .
however we wish to stress that the uncertainties in the data are too large to allow discrimination between any but the most extreme scenarios .
we expect to approximately double the number of measured @xmath30 when we add level-2 triggered events to this analysis .
we also hope to extract a comparable sample of @xmath15 data at forward rapidity from the existing data set .
m. c. abreu et al .
( na50 collaboration ) , phys .
lett * b 521 * 195 ( 2001 ) .
see for example b. zhang et al .
c * 62 * , 054905 ( 2000 ) .
see for example r. l. thews et al .
c * 63 * 054905 ( 2001 ) . the phenix collaboration , d. p. morrison et al .
, nucl . phys . *
a638 * , 565c ( 1998 ) .
the phenix collaboration , nucl .
instr . and meth .
, to be published .
k. adcox et al .
( the phenix collaboration ) , phys . rev . lett . * 86 * , 3500 ( 2001 ) .
j. f. amundson et al . , phys .
b * 390 * , 323 ( 1997 ) .
j. l. nagle and m. j. bennett , phys .
b * 465 * 21 ( 1999 ) . | results at cern sps @xcite interest in @xmath4 production heavy ion collisions new generation models dissociation recombination of @xmath9 pairs model predictions for rhic central collisions disappearance @xmath4 to enhancement results phenix on @xmath4 production at rhic detects electrons pseudo - rapidity @xmath10 muons @xmath11 central arms electrons identified charged particle tracks to energy deposits electromagnetic calorimeter rings imaging cherenkov detector muon arms muon candidates found identifying roads in muon identifier matching to tracks muon tracker 2001/2002 rhic run phenix recorded data @xmath2 @xmath3 collisions south muon arm operational data @xmath3 collisions luminosity of 150 @xmath12 minimum bias interaction trigger beam - counter one hit per arm interaction rates @xmath3 varied 5 to 30 @xmath4 events selected using level-1 triggers @xmath14 trigger required 700 mev in electromagnetic calorimeter @xmath15 trigger one deep shallow muon in muon identifier level-1 triggers allowed @xmath4 events at highest interaction ratesvertex cuts @xmath16 35 cm 38 cm selection good runs @xmath19 events sampled @xmath20 @xmath18 muon arm data subdivided into two rapidity bins detector acceptance level-1 trigger efficiency detector efficiency estimated typical run simulations single @xmath4 decays realistic detector response average correction run - run variations detector active area determined from azimuthal distribution electrons / event runs @xmath17 case two models transverse momentum distribution range values mean p@xmath21 systematic uncertainty acceptance necessary p@xmath21 distribution not defined low statistics systematic uncertainty estimated 10% pythia simulations estimate bbc trigger efficiency inelastic @xmath3 events fraction of events @xmath4 bbc trigger cross section calculations rhic luminosity systematic uncertainty 20% expected with more study systematic errors added in quadrature systematic uncertainty 35% for @xmath22 29% @xmath23 cross section data data @xmath2 collisions recorded integrated luminosity 24 @xmath24 minimum bias trigger @xmath2 collisions coincidence between bbc 2 hits per arm zero degree calorimeter )highest luminosities fraction interactions recorded level-2 triggers select @xmath4 events minimum bias triggers allocated @xmath25 20% data bandwidth interaction rates varied 100 to 1600 end @xmath2 run data samples minimum bias level-2 triggers equal preliminary analysis @xmath0 data analyzed minimum bias triggers used vertex cut @xmath27 cm good runs @xmath25 26 million events analyzed yields extracted 7 procedures systematic errors acceptance detector efficiency estimated simulations single @xmath4 decays response minimum bias trigger estimated unit efficiency central 90% interactions event centrality estimated data bbc zdc detectors data separated three centrality bins centrality dependence efficiency @xmath4 reconstruction estimated embedding simulated single electrons events single electron reconstruction efficiency efficiency occupancy systematic errors produced systematic uncertainty per centrality bin 26% ( 0 - 20% ) 27%(20 - 40% ) 26%(40 - 90% ) dielectron invariant mass spectrum @xmath2 fig . 1 @xmath3 fig . 3 invariant mass spectrum unlike - sign pair background0% invariant mass spectrum unlike - sign pair background,scaledwidth=100.0% @xmath4 rapidity distribution combining data @xmath17 @xmath18 channels shown fig . total cross section fitting gaussian pythia prediction rapidity distribution parton distribution function grv94lo same integral average results total cross section 3.8 @xmath16 0.6 stat ) @xmath16 1.3 ( sys ) @xmath8b agrees prediction color evaporation model @xcite branching ratio times dn / dy scaled n@xmath28 flat line best fit binary scaling value curve normal nuclear absorption model calculation branching ratio times dn / dy scaled n@xmath28 flat line best fit scaling curve @xmath0 yield versus number participants n@xmath29 ) shown fig . 5 @xmath3 data @xmath2 data three centrality bins limited conclusions data fig . 5 large statistical systematic uncertainties preliminary analysis fitted flat line data binary scaling best fit fig . 5 confidence level 16% statistical uncertaintiesbinary scaled @xmath4 yields trend down increasing n@xmath29 not strong fig . 5 comparison n@xmath29 dependence normal nuclear absorption model 7.1 mb absorption cross section confidence level 80% uncertainties large discrimination extreme scenarios expect double measured @xmath30 level-2 triggered events extract comparable @xmath15 data forward rapidity existing data set abreu et al . phys . lett 521 * 195 ( 2001 ) b zhang et al . 62 *, 054905 ( 2000 ) r l. thews et al 63 * 054905 ( 2001 ) phenix collaboration. morrison phys . a638 565c ( 1998 ) adcox phys . 86 * 3500 ( 2001 ) f. amundson et al . phys . * 390 *, 323 ( 1997 ) j. l. nagle m. j. bennett phys . b * 465 * 21 ( 1999 ) | 0.318401 | 2,156 | 1,098 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,766 | we report that hat - p-7 has a common proper motion stellar companion .
the companion is located at @xmath0 arcsec to the east and estimated as an m5.5v dwarf based on its colors .
we also confirm the presence of the third companion , which was first reported by @xcite , based on long - term radial velocity measurements .
we revisit the migration mechanism of hat - p-7b given the presence of those companions , and propose sequential kozai migration as a likely scenario in this system .
this scenario may explain the reason for an outlier in the discussion of the spin - orbit alignment timescale for hat - p-7b by @xcite . | to uncover formation mechanisms of diverse exoplanetary systems , the ( mis)alignment between the planetary orbital axis and the stellar spin axis , which can be measured via the rossiter - mclaughlin ( rm ) effect ( e.g. , @xcite ) or spot - crossing events ( e.g. , @xcite ) , has been recognized as an useful clue .
previous observations have revealed that about one third of hot jupiters have tilted or even retrograde orbits relative to their host star s spin ( e.g. , ) .
this indicates that not only disk - planet interaction but also few - body interaction ( planet - planet scattering and/or the kozai mechanism ) play an important role in planetary migration processes . moreover , some studies pointed out the interesting facts that spin - orbit misalignments in planetary orbits are apparently correlated with host star s temperature @xcite and age , while these correlations can be explained by the properties and evolution of the internal structure in host stars @xcite .
those correlations are important clues to understand the whole picture of planetary migration .
however , previous discussions often overlooked the possible presence of faint distant companions . in most of the rm measurements , except for some obvious cases ( e.g. , xo-2 , hd80606 )
, observers did not check whether the host star has outer companions .
thus any correlation between the spin - orbit misalignment and the existence of binary companions has not been well investigated . to solve this problem ,
we have started high - contrast direct imaging observations for known transiting planetary systems in the course of the seeds ( strategic explorations of exoplanets and disks with subaru ; @xcite ) project .
@xcite reported two candidate companions around hat - p-7 , which was known to have a retrograde hot jupiter hat - p-7b @xcite . in this letter , we present evidence that one of the two candidate companions is indeed a true companion of hat - p-7 , confirmed by the common proper motion and the distance from earth inferred from its spectral type and apparent magnitude .
( 85mm,85mm)fig1.eps ( 85mm,85mm)fig2.eps ccccccc ut dates & inst . & band & exp .
time [ s ] & mag.(east ) & mag.(west ) & ref .
+ 2009aug06 & hiciao & @xmath1 & 585@xmath2 & @xmath3 & @xmath4 & this work@xmath5 + 2009oct30 & astralux & @xmath6 & 30 & @xmath7 & non - detection & @xcite + 2009oct30 & astralux & @xmath8 & 30 & @xmath9 & non - detection & @xcite + 2009nov02 & hiciao & @xmath1 & 100@xmath10 & @xmath11 & @xmath12 & this work + 2011aug12 & ircs & @xmath13 & 560.6@xmath14 & @xmath15 & @xmath16 & this work + 2011aug12 & ircs & @xmath17 & 560.6@xmath14 & @xmath18 & @xmath19 & this work + 2011aug12 & ircs & @xmath20 & 396@xmath21 & @xmath22 & non - detection & this work + 2012jul07 & hiciao & @xmath1 & 1810@xmath23 & @xmath24 & @xmath25 & this work + ccccccc ut dates & inst . &
sa(east ) [ ] & pa(east ) [ @xmath26 & sa(west ) [ ] & pa(west ) [ @xmath26 & ref .
+ 2009aug06 & hiciao & @xmath27 & @xmath28 & @xmath29 & @xmath30 & @xcite + 2009nov02 & hiciao & @xmath31 & @xmath32 & @xmath33 & @xmath34 & this work + 2011aug12 & ircs & @xmath35 & @xmath36 & @xmath37 & @xmath38 & this work + 2012jul07 & hiciao & @xmath39 & @xmath40 & @xmath41 & @xmath42 & this work +
for high - contrast direct imaging , we employed ircs ( for @xmath13 , @xmath17 , @xmath20 bands ) and hiciao ( for @xmath1 band ) with ao188 @xcite on the subaru 8.2 m telescope .
our observation logs ( observing dates , instruments , filters , exposure times ) and properties of the candidate companions are summarized in tables 1 and 2 .
magnitudes of the bright companion are derived by relative photometry with the host star using unsaturated images , and then magnitudes of the faint companion are similarly derived by relative photometry with the bright companion using saturated images .
figure 1 shows pictures of hat - p-7 in different epochs and bands .
figure 2 plots time changes of positions of the candidate companions . based on the tycho-2 catalogue
, hat - p-7 has a proper motion of @xmath43 mas / yr in right ascension ( ra ) and @xmath44 mas / yr in declination ( dec ) . from figure 2
, we find that the motion of the western ( fainter ) candidate is consistent with a background star ( @xmath45 for a degree of freedom of 6 ) , while the motion of the eastern ( brighter ) candidate is different from a background star ( @xmath46 for a degree of freedom of 6 ) and consistent with a common proper motion with hat - p-7 .
in addition to the common proper motion , the spectral type of the eastern candidate supports a consistent distance with hat - p-7 , as follows .
the distance to hat - p-7 was estimated as @xmath47 pc by @xcite , based on the yonsei - yale stellar evolution models @xcite and sme ( spectroscopy made easy : ) analysis .
on the other hand , using the available colors ( @xmath6 , @xmath8 , @xmath13 , @xmath1 , @xmath17 ) , we confirm that the eastern companion is an m5.5v dwarf ( see figure 3 ) . based on the absolute magnitude of an m5.5v dwarf in @xmath1 band @xcite
, we estimate a distance modulus of @xmath48 , which corresponds to @xmath49 pc .
thus the spectro - photometric distance to the eastern companion is in good agreement with the distance to hat - p-7 from earth .
we thus conclude that hat - p-7 has a common proper motion stellar ( m5.5v ) companion at a projected separation of @xmath0 arcsec ( @xmath50 au ) .
note that assuming a random distribution for the companion orbit , the expected unprojected separation is @xmath51 times larger than the projected separation ( see also table 6 of @xcite for a conversion factor from the projected separation to the semi - major axis ) .
here we name the eastern companion as `` hat - p-7b '' ( hereafter , just `` b '' ) .
( 75mm,75mm)fig3.eps ( 85mm,85mm)fig4.eps
@xcite reported the possible existence of a third ( different from hat - p-7b and hat - p-7b ) companion from a long - term radial velocity ( rv ) trend observed with the keck hires between 2007 and 2009 .
we confirm the long - term trend based on rvs measured with the subaru hds in 2008 and 2010 ( the rvs are available upon request ) .
figure 4 shows the rvs taken with the subaru hds and residuals from the best - fit one - planet model with and without a long - term linear rv trend @xmath52 ( see @xcite , for the fitting procedure ) .
we find @xmath53 m s@xmath54 yr@xmath54 , which agrees well with @xcite ( @xmath55 m s@xmath54 yr@xmath54 ) .
note that `` b '' can not explain the observed long - term rv trend .
thus we conclude that there is the third companion in this system . here
we name the long - term rv companion as `` hat - p-7c '' ( hereafter , just `` c '' ) .
the trend corresponds to the mass constraint of `` c '' as , @xmath56 the orbital period of `` c '' is presumably longer than 10 yr , since the trend is still approximately linear .
thus `` c '' is likely to be more massive than jupiter .
we do not detect `` c '' in high - contrast direct images , because it is too close to the host star .
@xcite pointed out that hat - p-7b ( hereafter , just `` b '' ) can not be migrated by the kozai mechanism caused by `` b '' in the presence of `` c '' in the system .
however , they also pointed out that there is another possibility of `` sequential '' kozai migration ( see e.g. , @xcite ) in this system .
namely , an inclined outer stellar companion `` b '' causes the kozai mechanism for the outer `` c '' first , and then the inclined `` c '' induces the kozai mechanism for the inner `` b '' . such an initial inclined configuration can be formed by planet - planet scattering of `` b '' and `` c '' ( and other possible undetected massive planets )
recently , @xcite pointed out the interesting fact that the spin - orbit alignment timescale of hat - p-7 due to the tidal effect is much shorter than the star s age ( see figure 25 of @xcite ) .
namely , the retrograde orbit of hat - p-7b appears to be a strong outlier which should be aligned at the age of hat - p-7 .
however , they did not consider the existence of the outer companions `` b '' and `` c '' .
here we propose an alternative reason of the outlier : if the kozai oscillation of `` b '' caused by `` c '' had once happened , the tidal timescale for spin - orbit alignment can be much longer . based on equation ( 1 ) and the timescale of the kozai oscillation as , @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the host star s mass , @xmath59 , @xmath60 , and @xmath61 are the mass , orbital period , and eccentricity of `` c '' , and @xmath62 is the orbital period of `` b '' @xcite , we estimate that the timescale of kozai oscillation of `` b '' caused by `` c '' is comparable to the age of hat - p-7 ( @xmath63 gyr ) .
thus a possible slowly - changing orbital inclination due to the kozai oscillation might have prevented hat - p-7b from achieving a spin - orbit alignment .
we note that , however , the above discussion may be still optimistic , as the kozai oscillation is easily suppressed by other effects such as general relativity , tides , stellar distortion , or extra bodies ( see e.g. , @xcite ) . at the current position of `` b '' , the timescale of general relativity is indeed shorter than the timescale of kozai oscillation of `` b '' caused by `` c '' .
this means the kozai oscillation does not extend the timescale of spin - orbit alignment any more , although it might have once happened .
we thus note that we may still overlook other special conditions that inhibit the spin - orbit alignment in this system .
thus far , the existence of possible faint outer companions around planetary systems has not been checked and is often overlooked , even though the kozai migration models assume the presence of an outer companion . to further discuss planetary migration using the information of the rm effect / spot - crossing events as well as significant orbital eccentricities ,
it is important to incorporate information regarding the possible or known existence of binary companions .
this is also because a large fraction of the stars in the universe form binary systems @xcite .
thus it would be important to check the presence of faint binary companions by high - contrast direct imaging .
in addition , if any outer binary companion is found , it is also necessary to consider the possibility of sequential kozai migration in the system , since planet - planet scattering , if it occurs , is likely to form the initial condition of such planetary migration .
we present evidence that hat - p-7 has a common proper motion stellar companion by high - contrast direct imaging with subaru hiciao and ircs .
the companion is located at @xmath0 arcsec to the east and estimated as an m5.5v star based on its colors .
we also confirm the presence of the third companion hat - p-7c by rv measurements with the subaru hds .
our finding that hat - p-7 is a wide binary system increase the potential that the sequential kozai migration had once occured in this system .
this scenario may be favorable to explain the discrepancy between the spin - orbit alignment timescale for hat - p-7b and the stellar age noted by @xcite . in recent years
, a number of rm and spot - crossing observations have provided useful information on the spin - orbit ( mis)alignment , which is an important clue to understand the variety of planetary migration mechanisms .
the same holds for eccentric planetary systems , since the eccentricity is another important clue to discuss planetary migration by few - body interactions .
we thus propose that high - contrast direct imaging observations should be made for known planetary systems to check the presence of outer faint companions .
since the dependence of the spin - orbit ( mis)alignment or significant eccentricity on the existence of outer companions is still unclear , it is important to conduct such observations to understand the entire picture of planetary migration .
this paper is based on data collected at subaru telescope , which is operated by the national astronomical observatory of japan ( naoj ) .
this research has benefitted from the spex prism spectral libraries , maintained by adam burgasser at http://pono.ucsd.edu/ adam / browndwarfs / spexprism .
we are grateful to the referee , dr .
simon albrecht , for insightful suggestions .
n.n . acknowledges supports by naoj fellowship , nins program for cross - disciplinary study , and the japan society for promotion of science ( jsps ) grant - in - aid for research activity start - up no .
this work is partly supported by jsps fellowships for research ( dc1 : 22 - 5935 , 23 - 271 ) , a grant - in - aid for specially promoted research , no . 22000005 from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology ( mext ) , grant ast-1009203 from the national science foundation , and by the mitsubishi foundation .
part of this research was carried out at the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under a contract with the national aeronautics and space administration . | uncover formation mechanisms exoplanetary systems mis)alignment between planetary orbital axis stellar spin axis measured via rossiter - mclaughlin effect or spot - crossing events useful clue observations revealed one third of hot jupiters have tilted or retrograde orbits relative to host star s spin indicates disk - planet interaction few - body interaction scattering kozai mechanism important role in planetary migration processes studies spin - orbit misalignments correlated with host star s temperature age correlations explained by properties evolution internal structure host stars correlations important clues understand planetary migration previous discussions overlooked possible presence of faint distant companions rm measurements observers check host star outer companions correlation between spin - orbit misalignment existence binary companions not investigated solve started high - contrast direct imaging observations for transiting planetary systems seeds project @xcite reported two candidate companions around hat - p-7 retrograde hot jupiter hat - p-7b @xciteletter present evidence candidate companions true companion hat - p-7 confirmed motion distance earth spectral type magnitude 85mm)fig1.eps)fig2.eps dates inst band exp time mag.(east(west ) ref . 2009aug06 hiciao @xmath1 585@xmath2 @xmath4@xmath5 2009oct30 astralux @xmath6 30 @xmath7 non - detection @xcite 2009oct30 astralux @xmath8 30 @xmath9 non - detection 2009nov02 hiciao @xmath1 100@xmath10 @xmath12 2011aug12 ircs @xmath13 560.6@xmath14 @xmath16 2011aug12 ircs @xmath17 560.6@xmath14 2011aug12 ircs @xmath20 396@xmath21 @xmath22 non - detection 2012jul07 hiciao @xmath1 1810@xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 work dates inst . sa(east pa @xmath26 sa(west ) @xmath26 ref .2009aug06 hiciao @xmath27 @xmath28 @xcite 2009nov02 hiciao @xmath31 work 2011aug12 ircs @xmath35 @xmath36 work 2012jul07 hiciao @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath42 work high - contrast direct imaging employed ircs @xmath13 @xmath20 bands hiciao @xmath1 band ao188 @xcite subaru 8.2 m telescope observation logs dates instruments filters exposure times properties candidate companions summarized in tables 1 2 magnitudes bright companion derived relative photometry host star unsaturated images faint companion relative photometry saturated images figure 1 pictures hat - p-7 epochs bands figure 2 plots time changes positions candidate companions tycho-2 catalogue hat - p-7 proper motion @xmath43 mas / yr right ascension @xmath44 mas / yr declination motion western fainter candidate consistent with background star @xmath45 6 ) eastern brighter candidate different from background star @xmath46 6 ) consistent with common proper motion hat - p-7 spectral type eastern candidate supports consistent distance with hat - p-7distance to hat - p-7 estimated @xmath47 pc by @xcite based on yonsei - yale stellar evolution models analysis using available colors eastern companion is m5.5v dwarf figure 3 magnitude in band distance modulus @xmath48 corresponds to @xmath49 pc spectro - photometric distance to eastern companion with distance hat - p-7 from earth hat - p-7 has common proper motion stellar ( m5.5v ) companion at projected separation of @xmath0 arcsec ( @xmath50 au ) random distribution expected unprojected separation @xmath51 times larger than projected table 6 for conversion factor eastern companion as hat - p-7b '' @xcite reported existence third companion from long - term radial velocity trend with keck hires between 2007 and 2009 confirm long - term trend based on rvs measured with subaru hds in 2008 and 2010 figure 4 shows rvs taken with subaru hds residuals from best - fit one - planet model with without long - term linear rv trend @xmath52 procedurefind @xmath53 s@xmath54 agrees with @xcite `` b '' explain long - term rv trend conclude third companion in system name long - term rv companion hat - p-7c '' `` c '' trend corresponds to mass constraint of `` c '' orbital period of c '' longer than 10 yr trend linear c likely more massive than jupiter detect c '' in high - contrast images too close to host star @xcite hat - p-7b not be migrated by kozai mechanism `` b '' in presence of `` c '' possibility of sequential kozai migration inclined outer stellar companion `` b '' causes kozai mechanism for `` c '' '' configuration formed by planet - planet scattering of `` b '' c '' massive planets @xcite spin - orbit alignment timescale of hat - p-7 due to tidal effect shorter than star s age figure 25 retrograde orbit of hat - p-7b strong outlier should be aligned at age hat - p-7 consider existence of outer companions `` b '' and `` c ''propose alternative reason outlier if kozai oscillation b '' caused by c '' happened tidal timescale spin - orbit alignment longer based on equation ( 1 ) timescale kozai oscillation @xmath57 host star s mass mass orbital period eccentricity c '' orbital period `` b '' estimate timescale kozai oscillation b caused c comparable to age hat - p-7 ( @xmath63 gyr ) possible - changing orbital inclination due to kozai oscillation might prevented hat - p-7b spin - orbit alignment discussion optimistic kozai oscillation suppressed by effects general relativity tides stellar distortion extra bodies current position `` b '' timescale general relativity shorter than kozai oscillation caused by c '' kozai oscillation extend timescale spin - orbit alignment happened may overlook special conditions inhibit spin - orbit alignment existence possible faint outer companions around planetary systems not checked often overlooked kozai migration models assume presencediscuss planetary migration rm effect spot - crossing events orbital eccentricities important incorporate information possible binary companions large fraction stars form binary systems @xcite important check presence faint binary companions by high - contrast direct imaging if outer binary companion found consider possibility sequential kozai migration planet - planet scattering likely initial condition migration evidence hat - p-7 has common proper motion stellar companion by high - contrast direct imaging subaru companion located at @xmath0 arcsec east estimated m5.5v star confirm presence third companion hat - p-7c by rv measurements subaru hds hat - p-7 wide binary system potential sequential kozai migration explain discrepancy between spin - orbit alignment timescale for hat - p-7b stellar age @xcite rm spot - crossing observations provided information on spin - orbit mis)alignment important understand planetary migration mechanisms same eccentric planetary systems eccentricity migration propose high - contrast direct imaging observations for planetary systems check presence outer faint companions dependence spin - orbit mis)alignment eccentricity on existence outer companions unclear important to conduct observations understand picture planetary migrationpaper based on data at subaru telescope operated by national astronomical observatory japan research benefitted from spex prism spectral libraries maintained by adam burgasser.ucsd.edu grateful to referee dr . simon albrecht for suggestions supports naoj fellowship nins program cross disciplinary study japan society for promotion science grant - - aid research work partly supported by jsps fellowships research 22 - 5935 - 271 grant research 22000005 ministry education culture sports science grant ast-1009203 national science foundation mitsubishi foundation research at jet propulsion laboratory california institute of technology contract with national aeronautics space administration | 0.50538 | 3,277 | 1,642 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,767 | multiple - scattering approximations to faddeev calculations of the @xmath0 scattering length are reviewed and compared with published @xmath1 fully reactive faddeev calculations .
a new multiple - scattering approximation which goes beyond the ` fixed - center ' assumption for the nucleons is proposed , aiming at accuracies of @xmath2 .
a precise value of the @xmath0 scattering length from the measurement of the @xmath0 @xmath3 atomic level shift and width , planned by the dear / siddharta collaboration , plus a precise value for the @xmath4 scattering length by improving the @xmath4 atom measurements , are essential for extracting the @xmath5 scattering length , for resolving persistent puzzles in low - energy @xmath6 phenomenology and for extrapolating into @xmath7-nuclear systems . | the @xmath6 interaction near threshold is known , since the pioneering works by dalitz and collaborators in the 1960s,@xcite to be strongly attractive as well as strongly absorptive .
the experimental data which traditionally have been used to constrain it consist of elastic , charge - exchange and @xmath8 reaction cross sections at low energies , as low as @xmath9 mev / c , and of the @xmath10 resonance shape extracted from @xmath11 final - state interaction below threshold .
in addition , one has also three accurately determined branching ratios for @xmath12 absorption from rest .
a crucial experimental datum near threshold , the ( complex ) @xmath13 scattering length , is progressively becoming accurately determined in recent years from measurements of the energy shift and width of the @xmath4 atomic @xmath3 state.@xcite the scattering length @xmath14 may be expressed in terms of the @xmath6 @xmath15 scattering lengths @xmath16 and @xmath17 , respectively , as follows@xcite : @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the @xmath20 cm momentum with respect to the @xmath4 threshold . using the nlo corrected deser formula proposed recently by meiner _
et al._@xcite @xmath21 the value of @xmath14 derived from the dear measurement@xcite @xmath22 appears inconsistent with comprehensive fits to low - energy @xmath13 scattering and reaction data , as discussed recently in refs . and as shown pictorially in fig .
[ fig : raha ] taken from ref . .
furthermore , such fits leave the @xmath23 scattering length @xmath24 poorly determined . [
fig : raha ] a precise measurement of the energy shift and width of the @xmath0 atomic @xmath3 state is called for , in order to determine @xmath25 , and this indeed is one of the prime aims of the dear / siddharta experimental collaboration ( see e.g. johann zmeskal s talk in these proceedings ) .
a theoretically meaningful extraction of @xmath24 from @xmath14 and @xmath25 would require a relatively handy and accurate multiple - scattering ( ms ) approximation to the more involved coupled - channel faddeev calculation of the @xmath0 system at low energy .
several faddeev calculations of this sort have been reported.@xcite@xcite however , although the subject of ms approximations to the @xmath0 scattering length has been discussed extensively in recent years,@xcite@xcite only _ one _ of these works produced a correct expression@xcite within the commonly used ` fixed - center ' assumption for the nucleons , with a follow up recently in ref . .
the main purpose of this work is to review the existing ms approximations and to propose a new ms approximation for @xmath25 .
the proposed version goes beyond the ` fixed - center ' assumption .
this should enable one to make a reasonable prediction for the @xmath0 atom @xmath3 level- shift and width on the basis of given values of @xmath14 and @xmath24 without having to perform new time - consuming faddeev calculations or , _ vice - versa _ , to derive fairly reliably @xmath24 from the joint measurement of the @xmath3 level- shift and width in @xmath4 and @xmath0 atoms .
it was shown in the first fully reactive @xmath1 ( @xmath26 ) faddeev calculation@xcite that @xmath25 may be approximated to a few percent by neglecting the hyperonic channels altogether , in accordance with the conjecture by schick and gibson,@xcite provided the input to the @xmath27 faddeev equations consists of @xmath6 t matrices which implicitly account for the @xmath28 coupling .
the faddeev equations for the @xmath29 3-body system , with initial @xmath30 configuration , assume the form @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the free green s function and the full @xmath33 matrix is given by its breakdown into partial @xmath33 matrices : @xmath34 .
the partial @xmath35 and @xmath36 , upon a suitable choice of channels , stand for all the ms terms that start with a @xmath4 collision ( 2-body @xmath37 matrix ) and with a @xmath5 collision ( 2-body @xmath38 matrix ) , respectively , whereas @xmath39 consists of the terms that start with @xmath40 collisions ( 2-body @xmath41 matrix ) .
the choice of @xmath0 initial state dictates that the last of eqs .
( [ eq : t ] ) does not have an inhomogeneous term @xmath41 .
no antisymmetrization is explicitly applied yet for the @xmath42 subsystem .
the @xmath33 matrix which reduces in the limit of zero kinetic energy to the @xmath0 scattering length , up to a kinematical factor , is @xmath43 .
we now outline several ms approximations , progressively by order of complexity , beginning with the brueckner formula@xcite which was motivated by @xmath44 scattering for static nucleons .
charge - exchange degrees of freedom are then introduced and , wherever charge independence holds , the brueckner formula is generalized in terms of isoscalar and isovector meson - nuclear scattering lengths .
the brueckner formula is obtained by neglecting @xmath41 and hence also @xmath39 in eqs .
( [ eq : t ] ) , @xmath45 and treating the nucleons as fixed centers .
furthermore , mostly for the sake of illustration , the charge - exchange two - body channel @xmath46 is switched off , leading to the following expression : @xmath47 for zero - range interactions , and considering the necessary kinematical factors to transform from @xmath48 matrices to scattering lengths @xmath49 , it is straightforward to obtain from eq .
( [ eq : tbru ] ) the brueckner formula : @xmath50 @xmath51 where @xmath52 , with @xmath49 standing generically for @xmath53 and for @xmath54 in the @xmath55 cm system .
the numerator in the brueckner formula consists of single- and double - scattering terms , whereas the denominator provides for the renormalization of these terms to include all the higher - order scattering terms .
the relevant expansion parameter is @xmath56 , where @xmath57 for the deuteron wavefunction .
hence , this series faces divergence once the scattering length is of order @xmath58 fm or more , as we encounter for the @xmath59 channel .
in contrast , for low - energy pions . ] @xmath60 fm and the single- and double - scattering terms ( augmented by charge - exchange scattering as done below ) provide an excellent approximation to the brueckner formula for the @xmath61 scattering length.@xcite the generalization of the brueckner formula to include the charge exchange reaction on the proton ( on - shell for @xmath62 , off - shell for @xmath12 ) is given below .
the inclusion of charge - exchange degrees of freedom for @xmath0 scattering at threshold is due to ref . :
@xmath63 where @xmath64 , with @xmath65 and @xmath66 the threshold scattering amplitudes for @xmath67 and @xmath68 respectively . the derivation of eq .
( [ eq : brux ] ) shows that it holds also for @xmath69 , provided that the replacement @xmath70 is made in the @xmath6 amplitudes .
the charge - exchange scattering contribution to @xmath69 as well as to @xmath25 is substantial . when charge independence is assumed , all four @xmath6 amplitudes in eq .
( [ eq : brux ] ) are given in terms of the isoscalar and isovector threshold amplitudes @xmath71 which are related to the isospin scattering lengths @xmath72 by thresholds.@xcite ] @xmath73 eq .
( [ eq : brux ] ) simplifies then to @xmath74 in close analogy to deloff s expression@xcite for @xmath61 scattering at threshold : @xmath75 where the isoscalar and isovector @xmath76 threshold amplitudes are now given in terms of the isospin scattering lengths @xmath77 by @xmath78 eqs .
( [ eq : iso],[eq : pid ] ) may be obtained directly from eq .
( [ eq : tbru ] ) treating it as an operator relationship in isospace . in table
[ tab : fad ] we show the quality of the ` fixed center ' ms approximation .
( [ eq : int],[eq : iso ] ) were used to compare with values for @xmath25 reported in faddeev calculations done in the isospin basis , with the further approximation of replacing @xmath79 by the tpe matrix elements @xmath80 for @xmath81 from table 1 in ref . .
the values of @xmath82 and @xmath83 listed in the table are sufficient to determine the input scattering lengths @xmath16 and @xmath17 for eq .
( [ eq : iso ] ) .
this version of ms approximation reproduces the real part of @xmath25 to better than about @xmath84 and the imaginary part to within @xmath2 . for the particle - basis faddeev calculation of ref .
( [ eq : int],[eq : brux ] ) were used .
the extra scattering lengths , beyond @xmath82 and @xmath83 , are not listed here .
the renormalized tpe value for @xmath85 was used.@xcite the resulting value of @xmath25 is sensitive to the value used for this matrix element which diverges unless renormalized ; scaling it down from @xmath86 by the ratio of @xmath87 , we get @xmath88 fm , in better agreement with the faddeev value @xmath89 fm.@xcite in table [ tab : ms ] we list two ms evaluations of @xmath25 using a deuteron wavefunction based on the paris potential and @xmath6 input which is similar to that used in the tdd@xcite faddeev calculation .
the accuracy of these ms evaluations is typically @xmath90 .
also listed is our own ms approximation ( from table [ tab : fad ] ) which , perhaps fortuitously , works to about @xmath91 . under the ` fixed center ' assumption we have suppressed the terms @xmath92 and @xmath93 in the coupled faddeev equations for @xmath35 and @xmath36 , respectively , in eq . ( [ eq : t ] ) .
these terms may be rewritten in the form @xmath94 @xmath95 where @xmath96 , so that @xmath97 is a green s function which takes full account of the @xmath42 interaction but is still free with respect to the meson - nucleon interactions .
this leads to the following coupled equations for @xmath35 and @xmath36 : @xmath98 which are in the form of the ` fixed center ' faddeev equations ( [ eq : tfc ] ) with @xmath32 replaced by @xmath97 and with _
@xmath37 and @xmath38 : @xmath99 we thus obtain the following improvement over the brueckner formula eq .
( [ eq : tbru ] ) : @xmath100 this expression for @xmath101 provides as transparent and applicable ms expansion , with @xmath102 and @xmath103 , as the brueckner formula ms expansion is .
charge exchange degrees of freedom can be introduced in a straightforward manner , as done in subsection [ subsec : bru2 ] .
it is conceivable that one can reach in this way a level of accuracy of @xmath2 for approximating fully - reactive faddeev calculations .
in this talk i have surveyed schematically the derivation of ms approximations to the few available fully - reactive faddeev calculations for @xmath25 under the generally accepted practice of treating the nucleons as fixed centers . these ` fixed center ' ms approximations , which provide an excellent approximation scheme already at the double - scattering order for @xmath69 , require the full summation of the ms series for @xmath25 , using eq .
( [ eq : brux ] ) in the particle basis or eq .
( [ eq : iso ] ) in the isospin basis .
the accuracy thus provided is in the range of @xmath104 .
it should be stressed that effective field theory approaches do not yet offer any alternative scheme at present.@xcite i have subsequently outlined a theoretical ms approach for going beyond the ` fixed center ' assumption while keeping the formal appearance of the ` fixed center ' ms formulae , at the expense of renormalizing the input @xmath6 scattering amplitude and the free green s function which for fixed centers gives rise to the @xmath79 dependence of the ms series terms .
it is conceivable that one can reach in this way a level of accuracy of @xmath2 for approximating fully - reactive faddeev calculations .
the aim of this project is to free oneself of depending on available faddeev calculations , which might become obsolete if the dear measurement@xcite of the @xmath4 atomic @xmath3 level shift and width is confirmed and the error bars further reduced , since _ all _ the published faddeev calculations of @xmath25 use considerably larger values for the @xmath14 input .
this work was supported in part by grant 757/05 of the israel science foundation , jerusalem , israel .
ivanov , m. cargnelli , m. faber , h. fuhrmann , v.a .
ivanova , j. marton , n.i .
troitskaya and j. zmeskal , _ eur .
j. a _ * 23 * , 79 ( 2005 ) ; * 25 * , 329 ( 2005 ) ; arxiv : nucl - th/0505022 , presented at the _ international conference on exotic atoms , exa05 _ , stefan meyer institute of subatomic physics , vienna , austria , february 2005 ( http://www.oeaw.ac.at/smi/exa05 ) .
s. wycech and b. loiseau , arxiv : nucl - th/0508013 , presented at the _ international conference on exotic atoms , exa05 _ , stefan meyer institute of subatomic physics , vienna , austria , february 2005 ( http://www.oeaw.ac.at/smi/exa05 ) . | @xmath6 interaction near threshold known since works dalitz 1960s strongly attractive absorptive experimental data consist elastic charge - exchange @xmath8 reaction cross sections at low energies @xmath10 resonance shape from @xmath11 final - state interaction below threshold three determined branching ratios for @xmath12 absorption from rest crucial datum near @xmath13 scattering length determined from measurements energy shift width of @xmath4 atomic @xmath3 state scattering length @xmath14 expressed in @xmath6 @xmath15 scattering lengths @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath19 is @xmath20 cm momentum @xmath4 threshold nlo corrected deser formula by meiner et al. value of @xmath14 from measurement @xmath22 inconsistent with low - energy @xmath13 scattering reaction data fits leave @xmath23 scattering length @xmath24 poorly determined precise measurement of energy shift width of @xmath0 atomic @xmath3 state called for to determine @xmath25 prime aims of dear siddharta experimental collaborationjohann zmeskal s talk proceedings extraction @xmath24 from @xmath14 multiple - scattering ms ) approximation coupled - channel faddeev calculation @xmath0 system low energy several faddeev calculations reported ms approximations @xmath0 scattering length discussed only one produced correct expression fixed - center ' assumption nucleons follow up main purpose work review existing ms approximations propose new ms approximation for @xmath25 proposed version beyond fixed - center assumption reasonable prediction @xmath0 atom @xmath3 level- shift width values @xmath14 @xmath24 without new faddeev calculations derive @xmath24 from joint measurement @xmath3 level- shift width @xmath4 @xmath0 atoms shown first reactive @xmath1 @xmath26 ) faddeev calculation @xmath25 may approximated neglecting hyperonic channels conjecture schick and gibson input to @xmath27 faddeev equations @xmath6 t matrices account for @xmath28 couplingfaddeev equations @xmath29 3-body system @xmath30 configuration assume form @xmath31 @xmath32 free green s function full @xmath33 matrix breakdown into partial @xmath33 matrices @xmath34 partial @xmath35 @xmath36 stand ms terms @xmath4 collision @xmath5 collision @xmath39 terms @xmath40 collisions @xmath41 matrix choice @xmath0 initial state last eqs . t inhomogeneous term @xmath41 no antisymmetrization @xmath42 subsystem @xmath33 matrix reduces zero kinetic energy @xmath0 scattering length kinematical factor @xmath43 outline ms approximations order complexity brueckner formula@xcite motivated by @xmath44 scattering static nucleons charge - exchange degrees freedom introduced brueckner formula generalized isoscalar isovector meson - nuclear scattering lengths formula obtained neglecting @xmath41 @xmath39 in eqs . @xmath45 treating nucleons as fixed centerscharge - exchange two - body channel @xmath46 switched off @xmath47 zero - range interactions kinematical factors transform @xmath48 matrices to scattering lengths @xmath49 obtain brueckner formula @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath49 for @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 cm system numerator formula single- double - scattering terms denominator renormalization higher - order scattering terms expansion parameter @xmath56 @xmath57 deuteron wavefunction series faces divergence scattering length @xmath58 fm or more @xmath59 channel low - energy pions @xmath60 fm single- double - scattering terms augmented charge - exchange scattering approximation brueckner formula @xmath61 scattering length generalization formula charge exchange reaction on proton on - shell @xmath62 off - @xmath12 inclusion charge - exchange degrees freedom @xmath0 scattering at threshold due to @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 threshold scattering amplitudes @xmath67 @xmath68 derivation holds for @xmath69 replacement @xmath70 in @xmath6 amplitudescharge - exchange scattering contribution to @xmath69 @xmath25 substantial charge independence assumed four @xmath6 amplitudes given isoscalar isovector threshold amplitudes @xmath71 related to isospin scattering lengths @xmath72 thresholds @xmath73 eq simplifies to @xmath74 deloff s expression @xmath61 scattering at threshold @xmath75 isoscalar isovector @xmath76 threshold amplitudes isospin scattering lengths @xmath77 by @xmath78 eqs iso pid obtained from eq. tbru operator relationship isospace table quality fixed center ' ms approximation eq int iso compare with values @xmath25 faddeev calculations isospin basis replacing @xmath79 by tpe matrix elements @xmath80 for @xmath81 table values of @xmath82 @xmath83 determine input scattering lengths @xmath16 @xmath17 for eq approximation reproduces real part @xmath25 better than @xmath84 imaginary part within @xmath2 particle - basis faddeev calculation eq int brux used extra scattering lengths beyond @xmath82 @xmath83 not listedrenormalized tpe value @xmath85 used resulting value @xmath25 sensitive to matrix element diverges unless renormalized scaling down from @xmath86 ratio @xmath87 get @xmath88 fm agreement with faddeev value @xmath89 fm table ms two ms evaluations @xmath25 deuteron wavefunction paris potential @xmath6 input similar@xcite faddeev calculation accuracy typically @xmath90 own ms approximation works to @xmath91 suppressed terms @xmath92 @xmath93 in coupled faddeev equations @xmath35 @xmath36 terms rewritten @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 green s function account @xmath42 interaction free meson - nucleon interactions leads to coupled equations for @xmath35 @xmath36 : @xmath98 fixed center ' faddeev equations @xmath32 replaced by @xmath97 @xmath37 @xmath38 : @xmath99 improvement over brueckner formula eq @xmath100 expression @xmath101 provides transparent applicable ms expansion @xmath102 @xmath103 brueckner formula ms expansion charge exchange degrees freedom introduced subsection bru2 ] conceivable reach accuracy @xmath2 for approximating - reactive faddeev calculations surveyed derivation ms approximations to fully - reactive faddeev calculations for @xmath25 treating nucleons fixed centers fixed center ms approximations scheme double - scattering order @xmath69 require full summation ms series for @xmath25 using eq brux ] ) particle basis or iso ] ) isospin basis accuracy range of @xmath104 field theory approaches offer alternative scheme outlined theoretical ms approach beyond fixed center ' assumption formal appearance fixed center ms formulae renormalizing input @xmath6 scattering amplitude free green s function @xmath79 dependence ms series terms conceivable reach accuracy of @xmath2 for approximating fully - reactive faddeev calculations aim project free depending on available faddeev calculations obsolete if measurement @xmath4 atomic @xmath3 level shift width confirmed error bars reduced published faddeev calculations of @xmath25 use larger values for @xmath14 input work supported by grant 757/05 israel science foundationivanov cargnelli faber fuhrmann ivanova marton troitskaya zmeskal 23 * , 79 2005 25 * 329 ( 2005 ) arxiv nucl - th/0505022 international conference exotic atoms exa05 stefan meyer institute subatomic vienna austria february 2005 s. wycech b. loiseau arxiv nucl - th/0508013 international conference exotic atoms exa05 stefan meyer institute subatomic physics vienna february 2005 | 0.498551 | 3,209 | 1,716 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,768 | we give reasons for the existence of the @xmath0 decoupled dibaryon resonance @xmath1(1956 ) .
strong evidence for its presence has first been found in the energy spectrum of coincident photons emitted at @xmath2 from the @xmath3 process at 216 mev measured by the dib2@xmath4 collaboration at jinr . as further experimental indications of the @xmath1(1956 )
existence we present those found in the available photon energy spectra of @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and @xmath7 reactions below the pion threshold . it is noted that serious discrepancies between the @xmath5 and @xmath6 experimental cross sections and theoretical calculations can reasonably be explained by the fact that the latter did not take into account the @xmath1 effect . | recently the @xmath8 collaboration at jinr , carrying out searches for the @xmath0 decoupled dibaryon resonances in the reaction @xmath9 at an energy below the @xmath10 threshold @xcite , has reported @xcite the observation of such a state with a mass of about 1956 mev , which was called @xmath1 .
the conclusion for the existence of this resonance was drawn from the analysis of the energy spectrum for energetic ( @xmath11 mev ) coincident photons emitted at angles of @xmath2 in the laboratory system from the reaction @xmath9 at an energy of about 216 mev .
the measured spectrum shown in fig.1 consists of a narrow peak at a photon energy of about 24 mev and a relatively broad peak in the energy range ( 45 - 75 ) mev .
the statistical significances for the narrow and broad peaks are 5.3@xmath12 and 3.5@xmath12 , respectively .
the width of the narrow peak ( fwhm ) is about 8 mev , compatible with that of experimental resolution .
this behavior of the photon spectrum conforms to the signature of the @xmath0 decoupled dibaryon resonance @xmath1(1956 ) that is believed to be formed in the radiative process @xmath13 and then to decay via the @xmath14 mode , thereby contributing to the @xmath3 reaction .
the photon energy spectrum calculated with the help of monte carlo simulations under the assumption that the process @xmath15 is the only mechanism of the @xmath16 reaction proved to be in reasonable agreement with the experimental one .
the differential cross section of the resonance production of two photons emitted symmetrically at @xmath17 from the process @xmath18 at an energy of 216 mev was estimated to be @xmath19 9 nb / sr@xmath20 .
the total cross section for the @xmath1(1956 ) production in the @xmath21 reaction at 216 mev found as a result of multiplying this differential cross section by @xmath22 amounts to about 1.4 @xmath23 .
the existence of the @xmath1(1956 ) resonance implies , in particular , that in addition to the conventional mechanisms of photon production in @xmath0 interactions below the @xmath10 threshold there should exist a new one , the dibaryon mechanism @xmath24 .
obviously , depending on kinematical conditions of the @xmath25 and @xmath26 reactions this mechanism would make some contribution to inclusive photon energy spectra of these reactions .
such a contribution should be mainly concentrated in two photon energy regions specific for this dibaryon resonance , which are determined by energies of photons arising from the @xmath1(1956 ) formation and decay . in the center - of - mass system ,
the energy of a photon connected with the dibaryon formation ( @xmath27 ) is determined by its mass @xmath28 and the energy of colliding nucleons ( @xmath29 ) as @xmath30 , while the energy of a photon associated with the radiative dibaryon decay ( @xmath31 ) in the rest frame of this resonance is defined as @xmath32 , where @xmath33 is the invariant mass of the final @xmath0 state populated as a result of this decay .
the contribution from the dibaryon mechanism to the photon energy spectrum of the @xmath25 or @xmath26 reaction would compete with a substantial contribution from the conventional mechanisms .
moreover , in the case of @xmath34 collisions even at an energy below the @xmath10 threshold one should have in view the additional contribution from @xmath35 decays produced in @xmath0 collisions due to the nucleon fermi motion in nuclei . at the same time , since the bremsstrahlung cross section in @xmath36 scattering at energies around 200 mev is substantially larger than that for @xmath37 scattering , one can expect that the contribution of the dibaryon mechanism in @xmath36 and , hence , in @xmath34 scattering is also larger than in @xmath37 scattering . in search of further evidence for the existence of the @xmath1(1956 ) dibaryon resonance we decided to analyze the available experimental data on photon production in @xmath0 and @xmath34 collisions at energies below the @xmath10 threshold resulting in the photon energy spectra of the processes explored .
the inclusive photon energy spectrum of the reaction @xmath38 was measured at a neutron energy of 170@xmath3935 mev for high energy photons ( @xmath40 mev ) emitted at the angle @xmath41 @xcite .
this spectrum ( data were taken from ref .
@xcite and binned in 6 mev energy interval to reduce their statistical fluctuations ) is shown in fig . 2a
together with the prediction of the obe model @xcite folded with a gaussian with @xmath42 mev to allow for an energy spread of an incident beam and detector resolution . a resonance - like structure in the energy range from 45 to 75 mev
is clearly seen in this spectrum . at the same time
the calculated photon energy spectrum does not contain even a hint of the presence of any structure there . to solve the problem of this structure
the authors @xcite assumed that it was caused by the contribution from a capture process , that is , the process @xmath43 , which was not included in the calculations @xcite .
but since such a process ( see fig .
2a ) should contribute in an energy range extending beyond the structure in question , it was suggested in ref .
@xcite that the authors @xcite had incorrectly calibrated the energy response of their @xmath4 detector and so the capture peak was shifted by about 20 mev . however , if this is not the case and at least the shape of the @xmath5 spectrum @xcite is correct , then the question arises : what is the reason for this structure origin ? in fig .
2a we also show the energy spectrum of photons ( @xmath44 20 mev ) emitted at @xmath45 from the process @xmath46 at 170@xmath3935 mev calculated by the monte carlo method for the @xmath1(1956 ) production cross section of 4.3 @xmath23 .
as can be seen , the @xmath1(1956 ) contribution to the @xmath5 photon spectrum lies in the same energy range as the structure of interest and therefore the dibaryon mechanism can be considered as a likely cause for appearance of this structure . in this connection
the existing photon energy spectra of the @xmath47 @xcite reaction are of particular interest .
this is because for low and intermediate photon energies the @xmath48 spectrum is a good approximation to the free @xmath5 spectrum and thus it should reflect features inherent in the @xmath49 reaction .
the inclusive @xmath6 photon energy spectra were measured at an incident energy of 200 mev by the grenoble group @xcite and at 145 and 195 mev by the michigan state group @xcite .
the spectra measured by those groups for @xmath41 at an energy of 200 mev and 195 mev are in excellent agreement .
the experimental @xcite and calculated @xcite inclusive photon energy spectra of the @xmath6 reaction at 195 mev and @xmath41 are shown in fig .
we see again that the experimental spectrum clearly exhibits a characteristic structure in the range ( 45 - 75 ) mev , the presence of which leads to serious disagreement between the experimental and theoretical data .
this fact makes it reasonable to assume that the structure observed in the energy range ( 45 - 75 ) mev of both the @xmath5 and @xmath6 inclusive photon spectra can arise from the same underlying mechanism .
we believe that such a mechanism is the dibaryon mechanism in question . in fig .
2b we show the dibaryon mechanism contribution to the @xmath6 photon energy spectrum for the @xmath1(1956 ) production cross section of 9.4 @xmath23 calculated by the monte carlo method with the fermi motion of nucleons in the deuteron taken into account . simply adding this contribution to the theoretical spectrum @xcite we find that the agreement between the experimental and theoretical spectra becomes significantly better .
finally , the inclusive photon energy spectra were also measured in @xmath50 collisions @xcite .
obviously , the clearest manifestation of the dibaryon mechanism should be anticipated in spectra for light nuclei . in fig .
2c we show the inclusive photon energy spectrum for carbon ( lighter nucleus ) measured at an energy of 200 mev and corrected for the @xmath35 contribution @xcite .
the structure in the energy range ( 45 - 75 ) mev is also seen in this spectrum , it is very likely to be of the same origin as that observed in the @xmath5 and @xmath6 spectra . in fig . 2c
we also show the dibaryon mechanism contribution to the @xmath51 photon energy spectrum for the @xmath1(1956 ) production cross section of 56.5 @xmath23 .
we can see that this contribution is situated in the same energy region as the structure in question .
99 s. b. gerasimov and a. s. khrykin , mod .
phys . lett .
* a8 * , ( 1993)2457 .
s. b. gerasimov , s. n. ershov , a. s. khrykin , phys . at .
nucl.*58 * , ( 1995)844 .
a. s. khrykin et al . , phys .
c * 64 * , 034002(2001 ) .
f. malek et al.,phys.lett .
* b 266 * , 255(1991 ) .
pinston , et al.,phys.lett .
* b 249 * , 402(1990 ) .
j. clayton , et al .
c * 45 * , 1810(1992 ) .
f.p . brady et al.,phys.lett .
* b 349 * , 272(1995 ) .
s.f . shfer et al.,z.phys . * a 339 * , 391(1991 ) .
m. jetter and h.v .
von geramb , phys .
c * 49 * , 1832(1994 ) .
k. nakayama , phys .
c * 45 * , 2039(1992 ) .
j. clayton , et al .
c * 45 * , 1815(1992 ) . | @xmath8 collaboration at jinr @xmath0 decoupled dibaryon resonances in reaction @xmath9 below @xmath10 threshold reported state mass 1956 mev called @xmath1 conclusion existence resonance from analysis energy spectrum for @xmath11 mev coincident photons @xmath2 reaction @xmath9 energy 216 mev spectrum fig.1 narrow peak at 24 mev broad peak 45 - 75 ) mev statistical significances for peaks 5.3@xmath12 and 3.5@xmath12 width narrow peak 8 mev compatible with experimental resolution conforms to signature @xmath0 decoupled dibaryon resonance @xmath1(1956 ) formed in radiative process @xmath13 via @xmath14 mode contributing to @xmath3 reaction photon energy spectrum calculated simulations @xmath15 mechanism @xmath16 reaction with experimental differential cross section of resonance production of two photons at @xmath17 from @xmath18 216 mev estimated @xmath19 9 nb / sr@xmath20 total cross section for @xmath1(1956 ) production in @xmath21 reaction at 216 mev 1.4 @xmath23 @xmath1(1956 ) resonance implies conventional mechanisms photon production @xmath0 below @xmath10 threshold new dibaryon mechanism @xmath24 depending on conditions @xmath25 @xmath26 reactions mechanism photon energy spectra in two photon energy regions dibaryon determined by energies photons from @xmath1(1956 ) formation decay energy photon dibaryon formation @xmath27 ) determined by mass @xmath28 energy colliding nucleons @xmath29 ) energy photon radiative dibaryon decay ( @xmath31 ) defined as @xmath32 @xmath33 invariant mass of final @xmath0 state decay contribution dibaryon mechanism to photon energy spectrum @xmath25 @xmath26 reaction with conventional mechanisms @xmath34 collisions below @xmath10 threshold additional contribution from @xmath35 decays @xmath0 collisions due nucleon motion bremsstrahlung cross section in @xmath36 scattering at energies around 200 mev larger than @xmath37 scattering contribution dibaryon mechanism in @xmath36 @xmath34 scattering larger than @xmath37 scatteringevidence @xmath1(1956 ) dibaryon resonance experimental data photon production in @xmath0 @xmath34 collisions at energies below @xmath10 threshold photon energy spectra inclusive photon energy spectrum reaction @xmath38 measured at neutron energy 170@xmath3935 mev high energy photons ( @xmath40 mev ) at angle @xmath41 @xcite spectrum data from ref. @xcite binned 6 mev energy interval fluctuations shown in fig . 2a prediction obe model @xcite folded with gaussian @xmath42 mev energy spread incident beam detector resolution resonance - like structure in energy range 45 to 75 mev seen spectrum calculated photon energy spectrum contain structure problem structure authors assumed caused by contribution from capture process @xmath43 not included in calculations @xcite suggested authors incorrectly calibrated energy response @xmath4 detector capture peak shifted by 20 mev if not shape @xmath5 spectrum @xcite correct question reason for structure origin ? fig .show energy spectrum photons @xmath44 20 mev emitted @xmath45 @xmath46 170@xmath3935 mev calculated monte carlo method @xmath1(1956 ) production cross section 4.3 @xmath23 @xmath1(1956 ) contribution @xmath5 photon spectrum same energy range structure interest dibaryon mechanism likely cause appearance structure existing photon energy spectra @xmath47 @xcite reaction interest @xmath48 spectrum @xmath5 spectrum reflect features @xmath49 reaction inclusive @xmath6 photon energy spectra measured 200 mev grenoble group 145 195 mev michigan state group spectra @xmath41 200 mev 195 mev agreement experimental calculated photon energy spectra @xmath6 reaction 195 mev @xmath41 shown fig . experimental spectrum exhibits characteristic structure range 45 - 75 ) mev disagreement experimental theoretical data structure energy range 45 - 75 ) mev @xmath5 @xmath6 photon spectra same mechanism dibaryon mechanism fig . 2b dibaryon mechanism contribution @xmath6 photon energy spectrum @xmath1(1956 ) production cross section 9.4 @xmath23 calculated monte carlo method fermi motion nucleons deuteronadding contribution to theoretical spectrum @xcite agreement between experimental theoretical spectra better inclusive photon energy spectra measured in @xmath50 collisions @xcite clearest manifestation dibaryon mechanism anticipated in spectra light nuclei fig . 2c inclusive photon energy spectrum for carbon lighter nucleus measured at energy 200 mev corrected for @xmath35 contribution @xcite structure in energy range 45 - 75 ) mev likely same origin as @xmath5 @xmath6 spectra fig . 2c dibaryon mechanism contribution to @xmath51 photon energy spectrum for @xmath1(1956 ) production cross section 56.5 @xmath23 contribution same energy region as structure b gerasimov s khrykin . a8 1993)2457 1995)844 64 034002(2001 ) malek et al.,phys.lett 266 255(1991 ) pinston ,phys.lett 249 402(1990 ) clayton 45 1810(1992 ) brady et al.,phys.lett 349 272(1995 ) shfer et al.339 391(1991 ) jetter geramb phys . c 49 1832(1994 ) nakayama . c 45 2039(1992 ) clayton al c 45 1815(1992 ) | 0.358252 | 2,332 | 1,264 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,772 | we perform nonequilibrium simulations of heat conduction in a three dimensional anharmonic lattice . by studying slabs of length @xmath0 and width @xmath1
, we examine the cross - over from one - dimensional to three dimensional behavior of the thermal conductivity @xmath2 .
we find that for large @xmath0 , the cross - over takes place at a small value of the aspect ratio @xmath3 . > from our numerical data we conclude that the three dimensional system has a finite non - diverging @xmath2 and thus provide the first verification of fourier s law in a system without pinning .
macroscopic behavior of heat transport in the linear response regime is governed by fourier s law |j & = & -| t(|x ) , [ fourier ] where @xmath4 , @xmath5 are respectively the heat current density and temperature gradient at the position @xmath6 , and @xmath2 is the thermal conductivity .
this implies diffusive behavior of heat .
what are the necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of fourier s law ?
this question is a longstanding unsolved problem @xcite . for solids one
starts with the description in terms of a harmonic crystal where heat conduction takes place through lattice vibrations or phonons .
scattering of the phonons can occur due to phonon - phonon interactions ( _ i.e _ anharmonicity in the interactions ) or by impurities ( e.g isotopic disorder , defects ) @xcite .
for one dimensional systems , from a large number of numerical and analytical studies it is now established that these scattering mechanisms are insufficient in ensuring normal diffusive transport .
instead one finds anomalous transport @xcite , one of the main signatures of this being that the thermal conductivity @xmath2 in such systems is no longer an intrinsic material property but depends on the linear size @xmath0 of the system . a power law dependence @xmath7
is typically observed .
for two dimensional anharmonic crystals a @xmath8 divergence of the conductivity is predicted from various analytical theories @xcite and also from an exactly solved stochastic model @xcite , but the numerical evidence for this so far is inconclusive @xcite . a recent experiment has reported the breakdown of fourier s law in nanotubes @xcite while another experiment on graphene flakes @xcite also indicates a divergence of @xmath2 . for systems with pinning ( an external substrate potential ) and anharmonicity , fourier s law has been verified in simulations on one and two dimensional systems @xcite .
there is a strong belief that fourier s law should be valid in three dimensional ( @xmath9 ) systems , even without pinning .
a recent work @xcite examined heat transport in a @xmath9 disordered harmonic crystal .
analytical arguments showed that heat conduction in the system was sensitive to boundary conditions .
for generic boundary conditions a finite conductivity was predicted but this could be numerically verified only for the pinned case . in this letter
we investigate the effect of anharmonicity on heat conduction in ordered crystals . through extensive simulations of a @xmath9 anharmonic crystal
we give strong numerical evidence for normal transport and the validity of fourier s law in this system . | we consider a @xmath9 cubic crystal with a scalar displacement field @xmath10 defined on each lattice site @xmath11 where @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
the hamiltonian is taken to be of the fermi - pasta - ulam ( fpu ) form : h&= & _ + _ , [ ( x_-x_+)^2 + ( x_-x_+)^4 ] , + [ ham ] where @xmath14 denotes unit vectors in the three directions . we have set the values of all masses and harmonic spring constants to one and the anharmonicity parameter is @xmath15 .
two of the faces of the crystal , namely those at @xmath16 and @xmath17 , are coupled to white noise langevin type heat baths so that the equations of motion of the particles are given by : _ & = & - _ + & + & _ n_1,1 ( -_+^l _ ) + _ n_1,n ( -_+^r _ ) .
[ eqm ] the noise terms at different sites are uncorrelated while at a given site the noise strength is specified by @xmath18 , where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the temperatures of the left and right baths and we have chosen units where the boltzmann constant @xmath21 . fixed boundary conditions were used for the particles connected to the baths and periodic boundary conditions were imposed in all the other directions .
we simulate these equations using a velocity - verlet algorithm @xcite and calculate the heat current and the temperature profile in the nonequilibrium steady state of the crystal . the heat current @xmath22 from the lattice site @xmath23 to @xmath24 where @xmath25 , is given by @xmath26 , with @xmath27 being the force on the particle at site @xmath24 due to the particle at site @xmath23 . in our simulations
we calculate the average current per bond given by j= _ n_1=1^n-1 _ n_2,n_3=1^w j _ .
we also calculate the average temperature across layers in the slab and this is given by @xmath28 .
in all our simulations we set @xmath29 and @xmath30 . we first address the question of the dependence of @xmath31 on the width @xmath1 of the system and the nature of the cross - over from @xmath32 behaviour , for small values of the ratio @xmath33 , to true @xmath9 behavior for @xmath34 .
the numerical results are given in fig .
( [ crossover ] ) .
we see that for any fixed length @xmath0 , the value of @xmath31 decreases as we increase @xmath1 but saturates quickly to the @xmath9 value .
the cross - over width @xmath35 is seen to increase slowly with @xmath0 .
the inset shows that as we increase @xmath0 , the cross - over from @xmath32 to @xmath9 behavior takes place at decreasing values of @xmath36 and presumably in the thermodynamic limit @xmath37 , the cross - over occurs at @xmath38 .
thus our study suggests that @xmath39 with @xmath40 .
a similar result was obtained by grassberger and yang @xcite for a @xmath41 fpu system .
next we look at the dependence of @xmath31 on @xmath0 for the @xmath9 case .
the fast cross - over from @xmath32 to @xmath9 behaviour implies that we can extrapolate the results for small @xmath36 to estimate the true value of the @xmath9 current ( at @xmath42 ) .
thus we can get results for quite large values of @xmath0 from simulations on systems with small widths . for sizes up to @xmath43 we obtained data for @xmath44 .
for the largest system size , namely @xmath45 we have data for @xmath46 .
we show our results for the @xmath0 dependence of @xmath2 in fig .
( [ jvsn ] ) .
there are three sources of error in the values of current : ( i ) numerical errors , arising from the finite time discretization value ( @xmath47 ) , and from rounding off errors ; ( ii ) statistical errors arising from averaging over a finite number of time steps ; and ( iii ) errors arising from the extrapolation of the small aspect ratio ( @xmath36 ) results to the @xmath9 case . the error from ( iii )
was taken to be the difference in current values for the two largest widths studied . for smaller system sizes we verified that the numerical error was much smaller than the statistical and extrapolation errors and
we assume that this is true also at larger system sizes .
the error - bar for each data point plotted in fig .
( [ jvsn ] ) is the larger of errors from ( ii ) and ( iii ) . versus width @xmath1 for different fixed values of the length @xmath0 .
the inset plots @xmath31 versus the aspect ratio @xmath33.,width=307 ] -versus-@xmath0 in different dimensions .
the inset shows the running slope @xmath48 as a function of @xmath0 .
the dashed line is a guide to the eyes .
, width=307 ] the slope of the @xmath2 versus @xmath0 curve is decreasing slowly with @xmath0 and a straight line fit to the last three points gives an exponent @xmath49 .
for comparison we also show in fig .
( [ jvsn ] ) the @xmath32 and @xmath41 data for the fpu system .
the @xmath41 results are from data for @xmath50 samples for systems up to @xmath51 while for larger sizes the results shown are extrapolated values from small width data . in @xmath32
we get @xmath52 @xcite while in @xmath41 we get @xmath53 . in the inset of fig .
( [ jvsn ] ) we have plotted the running slope defined as @xmath48 against system size . from this we see that while the slopes in @xmath32 and @xmath41 tend to saturate , the @xmath9 slope seems to be decreasing .
the @xmath9 slope can be fitted by the dashed line with a power law form .
this suggests that the asymptotic system size behaviour will give @xmath54 implying diffusive transport and validity of fourier s law .
one of the remarkable features of @xmath32 systems with anomalous heat transport is the form of the steady state temperature profile obtained in these systems .
typically one finds that the temperature profile is concave upwards in part of the system and concave downwards elsewhere and this is true even for small temperature differences @xcite .
this means that the temperature gradient is non - monotonic as a function of distance across the sample . in fig.([temp_pro ] ) we plot the temperature profiles for the @xmath32 , @xmath41 and @xmath9 samples .
we see that the variation of the temperature gradients are non - monotonic in both @xmath32 and @xmath41 while in @xmath9 they are monotonic .
the inset in fig .
( [ temp_pro])shows that the @xmath9 temperature profile is concave upward everywhere .
we have also confirmed that the profile becomes more linear on decreasing the temperature difference between @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
this again supports our finding based on the size - dependence of the current , that heat transport in @xmath9 is diffusive while in lower dimensions it is anomalous .
finally we look at the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity . temperature and nonlinearity
are highly correlated @xcite , and temperature dependence can be understood from the nonlinearity dependence of thermal conductivity .
we note that eq .
( [ eqm ] ) leads to the scaling relation @xmath55 , where @xmath56 , @xmath57 , and @xmath58 is an arbitrary scale factor .
taking the limit @xmath59 , this gives the scaling relation for thermal conductivity as @xmath60 .
putting @xmath61 and @xmath62 , we then get ( t , ) = ( t , 1 ) [ conductivity_scaling ] .
thus the thermal conductivity is a function of @xmath63 .
one may expect that large @xmath15 suppresses heat currents due to enhancement of phonon - phonon interactions .
hence from the scaling ( [ conductivity_scaling ] ) we expect that @xmath2 must also decrease with increasing @xmath64 . to check this , we show the dependence of the heat current on @xmath63 for a @xmath65 system with a small temperature difference @xmath66 . in fig.([temp_depe ] ) , we compared two cases : one with @xmath67 fixed and @xmath64 varied , and another with @xmath68 fixed and @xmath15 varied .
we find that current decreases as a function of @xmath63 , consistent with the scaling relation eq .
( [ conductivity_scaling ] ) .
we note that fourier s law ( [ fourier ] ) leads to @xmath69 and so the decrease of @xmath2 in the region @xmath70 $ ] with @xmath67 is consistent with the concave curve in the @xmath9 temperature profiles .
interestingly at large anharmonicity the current does not seem to go to zero but instead appears to saturate to a constant value . at low temperatures
the effect of anharmonicity becomes weaker and we expect the conductivity to increase , eventually diverging in the limit @xmath71 .
it is difficult to numerically access the low temperature regime since the mean free path becomes large and one would need much larger system sizes to see diffusive behaviour .
in summary , we have given the first numerical evidence for the validity of fourier s law of heat conduction in an anharmonic crystal in three dimensions .
this confirms the belief that in three dimensions anharmonicity is a _ sufficient _ condition for normal transport .
this is not a necessary condition since , for example , a @xmath9 pinned disordered purely harmonic crystal also shows normal transport @xcite .
our conclusion was based on three evidences .
the first is the system - size dependence of the thermal conductivity , the second is temperature profile , and the third is the consistency between temperature profile and temperature dependence of conductivity .
it has been known that the one - dimensional fpu system shows slow convergence of the thermal conductivity to it s asymptotic behavior @xcite . here
we show that this is also the case in @xmath9 .
unlike @xmath32 and @xmath41 , the running slope of the size dependence of @xmath2 in @xmath9 showed decreasing behavior even at the largest system size and this gives us a clear signature for finite @xmath2 .
the temperature profiles in @xmath9 are completely different type from the @xmath32 and @xmath41 case where nonmonotonic behavior of the gradient is robust even for small temperature differences .
we note that a recent simulation of heat conduction in the @xmath9 fpu crystals reported diverging thermal conductivity ( the reported exponent is about @xmath72 ) @xcite .
the reasons for this is probably because of the small values of anharmonicity used in those simulations and also the much smaller system sizes that were studied ( maximum size in that study was @xmath73 ) . in @xmath41
we find a divergence of the conductivity with an exponent @xmath53 which is similar to the value obtained in @xcite . for a sample of fixed length @xmath0
we find that the current density decreases on increasing its width @xmath1 and the cross - over from @xmath32 to @xmath9 behaviour takes place at a value @xmath74 with @xmath40 .
this has implications for experiments measuring thermal conductivity of nanowires @xcite .
if the cross - over width were independent of @xmath0 and the width of the nanowire larger than it , then the thermal conductivity of long nanowires could well be finite and not diverge as expected for true @xmath32 systems .
on the other hand , since the cross - over width gradually increases with increasing @xmath0 , a gradual transition from @xmath9-like to @xmath32 behavior will take place when the cross - over width is comparable to the width of nanowires .
this scenario is an interesting system size effect that may be observed in experiments on nanowires .
system , a @xmath50 @xmath41 system and a @xmath75 @xmath9 system with different aspect ratios @xmath33 .
temperature profiles for the three aspect ratios overlap with each other .
the inset shows that the @xmath9 temperature profile is concave upward everywhere.,width=288 ] ) for @xmath65 system with @xmath66 .
thermal conductivities decrease as increasing temperature @xmath64 or nonlinearity @xmath15 .
this temperature dependence of @xmath2 explains the slightly concave curve in temperature profiles in @xmath9 ( see fig.([temp_pro])).,width=288 ] | @xmath9 cubic crystal scalar displacement field @xmath10 lattice site @xmath11 hamiltonian fermi - pasta - ulam form h&= x_-x_+)^2 + x-x_+)^4 @xmath14 unit vectors three directions set values masses harmonic spring constants one anharmonicity parameter @xmath15 faces crystal @xmath16 @xmath17 coupled white noise langevin heat baths equations motion particles = - n_1,1 ( -_+^l _ ) + n_1,n ( -_+^r _ ) noise terms sites uncorrelated noise strength specified @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 temperatures left right baths chosen units boltzmann constant @xmath21 fixed boundary conditions particles connected baths periodic boundary conditions other directions simulate equations velocity - verlet algorithm @xcite calculate heat current temperature profile nonequilibrium steady state crystal heat current @xmath22 lattice site @xmath23 @xmath24 given @xmath26 @xmath27 force particle site @xmath24 @xmath23 calculate average current per bond j= n_1=1^n-1 n_2,n_3=1^wcalculate average temperature across layers slab given by @xmath28 simulations set @xmath29 address dependence @xmath31 on width @xmath1 cross - over from @xmath32 small values to @xmath9 behavior @xmath34 numerical results in fig . fixed length @xmath0 value @xmath31 decreases @xmath1 saturates quickly to @xmath9 cross - over width @xmath35 slowly with @xmath0 increase @xmath0 cross - over from to @xmath9 decreasing values @xmath36 cross - over occurs at @xmath38 study suggests @xmath39 with @xmath40 similar result grassberger yang for @xmath41 fpu system dependence @xmath31 on @xmath0 for @xmath9 case fast cross - over from to extrapolate results small @xmath36 estimate value @xmath9 current @xmath42 results large values @xmath0 from simulations small widths sizes up to @xmath43 data for @xmath44 largest system size @xmath45 data for @xmath46 results @xmath0 dependence @xmath2 in fig .three sources error in values current numerical errors finite time discretization value @xmath47 rounding off errors statistical errors averaging finite time steps errors extrapolation small aspect ratio @xmath36 results to @xmath9 case error from iii ) difference in current values for two largest widths smaller system sizes numerical error smaller than statistical extrapolation errors at larger system sizes error - bar for data point fig . larger errors from ii iii width @xmath1 fixed values length @xmath0 inset plots @xmath31 versus @xmath33@xmath0 different dimensions shows running slope @xmath48 function of @xmath0 dashed line guide slope @xmath2 versus @xmath0 curve decreasing with @xmath0 straight line last three points gives exponent @xmath49 fig . @xmath32 @xmath41 data for fpu system @xmath41 results from @xmath50 samples up to @xmath51 larger sizes results extrapolated from small width data in @xmath32 @xmath52 @xmath41 @xmath53 fig plotted running slope @xmath48 against system sizeslopes in @xmath32 @xmath41 saturate @xmath9 slope decreasing slope fitted by dashed line with power law form asymptotic system size behaviour @xmath54 diffusive transport validity of fourier s law @xmath32 systems with anomalous heat transport steady state temperature profile temperature profile concave upwards part concave downwards elsewhere for small temperature differences temperature gradient non - monotonic function of distance across sample fig. temperature profiles for @xmath32 @xmath41 @xmath9 samples temperature gradients non - monotonic in @xmath32 @xmath41 @xmath9 monotonic @xmath9 temperature profile concave upward everywhere profile more linear on decreasing temperature difference between @xmath19 @xmath20 supports finding size - dependence heat transport in @xmath9 diffusive lower dimensions anomalous temperature dependence of thermal conductivity temperature nonlinearity correlated dependence understood from nonlinearity dependence eq . ( eqm ) leads to scaling relation @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 arbitrary scale factorlimit @xmath59 scaling relation thermal conductivity @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 ( t , ) = ( t , 1 ) [ conductivity_scaling thermal conductivity function of @xmath63 large @xmath15 suppresses heat currents phonon - interactions @xmath2 decrease increasing @xmath64 heat current on @xmath63 for @xmath65 system small temperature difference @xmath66 compared two cases @xmath67 fixed @xmath64 varied @xmath68 fixed @xmath15 varied current decreases function of @xmath63 consistent with scaling relation fourier s law leads to @xmath69 decrease @xmath2 region @xmath70 with @xmath67 consistent with concave curve @xmath9 temperature profiles large anharmonicity current zero constant low temperatures effect anharmonicity weaker conductivity increase diverging in limit @xmath71 difficult to access low temperature regime mean free path large larger system sizes diffusive behaviour first numerical evidence for validity fourier s law of heat conduction in anharmonic crystal in three dimensions confirms belief anharmonicity sufficient condition for normal transportnot necessary condition @xmath9 harmonic crystal shows normal transport @xcite conclusion based on three evidences first system - size dependence thermal conductivity temperature profile consistency between temperature one - dimensional fpu system shows slow convergence thermal conductivity to asymptotic behavior @xcite in @xmath9 running slope size dependence @xmath2 showed decreasing behavior at largest system size signature for finite @xmath2 temperature profiles in @xmath9 different from nonmonotonic behavior robust for small temperature differences recent simulation heat conduction in @xmath9 fpu crystals reported diverging thermal conductivity exponent @xmath72 ) @xcite small values anharmonicity smaller system sizes in @xmath41 divergence conductivity with exponent @xmath53 similar to value @xcite sample fixed length @xmath0 current density decreases on increasing width @xmath1 cross - over from @xmath32 to @xmath9 behaviour at value @xmath74 with @xmath40 implications for experiments thermal conductivity of nanowires @xcitecross - over width independent of @xmath0 nanowire larger thermal conductivity of long nanowires finite not diverge for @xmath32 systems cross - over width increases @xmath0 transition from @xmath9-like to @xmath32 when width comparable to nanowires system size effect observed in experiments on nanowires @xmath50 @xmath75 system different aspect ratios temperature profiles overlap @xmath9 temperature profile concave upward @xmath65 @xmath66 thermal conductivities decrease temperature @xmath64 nonlinearity @xmath15 temperature dependence of @xmath2 explains concave curve in temperature profiles in @xmath9 fig | 0.437519 | 2,858 | 1,499 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,777 | functional renormalisation group approach is applied to a system of kaons at finite chemical potential .
a set of approximate flow equations for the effective couplings is derived and solved . at high scale
the system is found to be at the normal phase whereas at some critical value of the running scale it undergoes the phase transition ( pt ) to the phase with a spontaneously broken symmetry with the kaon condensate as an order parameter .
the value of the condensate turns out to be quite sensitive to the kaon - kaon scattering length .
the study of phase structure of dense hadron matter is one of the key problems of the strong interaction physics described by qcd . at low energy
the qcd can be reduced to an effective theory containing goldstone bosons as effective degrees of freedom .
the extension of this effective theory to finite density requires taking into consideration nonzero isospin / strange chemical potential .
the physical motivation for such an extension is provided by a wide range of phenomenon occurring in heavy - ion collisions and the equation of state ( eos ) of the neutron stars @xcite . at finite density
these bosons may condense .
this condensation shows up in a variety of the physical systems .
for example , there is a strong possibility that a kaon condensation may exist in a core of the neutron stars so that a realistic analysis of such possibility as well as estimates of the value of the condensate may turn out to be important for establishing correct eos .
it is rather well known that , depending on the value of the chemical potential , the following phases can be realised : normal phase with the trivial vacuum , pion condensation / kaon condensation . in this letter
we focus on the kaon condensation which will be studied in the framework of the functional renormalisation group ( frg ) .
the more general case of the mixed pion / kaon condensation will be reported elsewhere .
the frg method has been applied to a wide spectrum of the problems ranging from cold atoms to quantum gravity . in the context of pt
the approach has been used to study the phase structure of neutron matter @xcite , the phenomena of bose - einstein condensation ( bec)@xcite and both balanced @xcite and imbalanced @xcite systems of cold fermionic atoms etc .
the approach makes use of the legendre transformed effective action : @xmath0=w[j]-j\cdot \phi_c$ ] , where @xmath1 is the usual partition function in the presence of an external source @xmath2 . the action functional @xmath3 generates the 1pi green s functions and it reduces to the effective potential for homogeneous systems . in the frg
one introduces an artificial renormalisation group flow , generated by a momentum scale @xmath4 and we define the effective action by integrating over components of the fields with @xmath5 .
the rg trajectory then interpolates between the classical action of the underlying field theory ( at large @xmath4 ) when the quantum fluctuation effects are excluded , and the full effective action ( at @xmath6 ) with all quantum fluctuations taken into account .
the evolution equation for @xmath3 @xcite in the frg has a one - loop structure and can be written as @xmath7 .
\label{eq : gamevol}\ ] ] here @xmath8 is the matrix containing second functional derivatives of the effective action with respect to the boson fields and @xmath9 is a matrix containing the corresponding cut - off functions which must vanish when the running scale approaches zero .
the flow equation as written above is just a differential form of a general functional intergal and has therefore a little practical sense . in order to actually solve the flow equations one needs to choose a certain ansatz for the effective action motivated by the form of the action at the starting scale and the undelying symmetries .
the ansatz assumed in this work is @xmath10 = \int d^4x\ , \left[z_\phi\,(\partial_0 + i \mu)\phi^\dagger\,(\partial_0 - i \mu)\phi -z_m\,\partial_i\phi^\dagger\partial_i\phi - u(\phi,\phi^\dagger)\right],\ ] ] where @xmath11 and @xmath12 are the renormalisation factors depending on the running scale and @xmath13 is a complex doublet field defined as follows @xmath14 the first and second components of the doublet can be identified with the pair of ( @xmath15 ) and ( @xmath16 ) mesons correspondingly .
the effective potential depends only on the combination @xmath17 .
we expand the effective potential @xmath18 near its minima and keep terms up to order @xmath19 .
@xmath20 where first three terms correspond to the expansion near the minimum with respect to the first doublet and the rest is the expansion near the minimum with respect to the second doublet .
note that the standard mass term is included in the definition of the @xmath21 coupling .
the chemical potential is provided by the external conditions ( we assume @xmath22 0 ) .
the action is invariant under the global @xmath23 group , where @xmath24 is the isospin group and @xmath25 is related to hypercharge .
it essentually captures the mean features of the kaon condensation phenomena .
substituting the ansatz for @xmath3 into the flow equation and performing the contour integration one can get the evolution equation for the effective potential which acts as a driving term generating the flow of the couplings . at large scale
we expect symmetric state with the trivial minimum of the effective potential whereas at lower scale comparable with the value of chemical potential a formation of the condensate is expected . @xmath26 where @xmath27 and @xmath28 here @xmath29 .
@xmath30 and @xmath31 determine the pole positions of the corresponding propagator @xmath32 another two poles are those with the overall minus sign in front .
the positive and negative values of energy correspond to creation and annihilation of the exitations , respectively . for our purposes
it is sufficient to pick up only positive eigenvalues .
note that the pole position defines the corresponding dispersion relations in the general case of nonzero regulator @xmath33 0 .
taking @xmath34 , @xmath35 and @xmath36 0 one can recover the dispersion relations in the broken phase derived in refs .
@xcite .
@xmath37 another dispersion relations , also derived in refs .
@xcite in the limit of @xmath34 , @xmath35 take the form @xmath38 as one can easily be seen from the above expressions two of the dispersion relations describe goldstone bosons , i.e gapless modes when @xmath39 0 .
this is the example of the nontrivial situation when the number of the broken generators is not equal to the number of the massless modes . indeed , since the initial global @xmath23 symmetry is broken to @xmath25 one could expect three massless modes .
the problem was studied in details in @xcite where is was shown that in the system with a broken lorenz symmetry the number of gapless modes may be lesser then the number of broken generators .
the physical reason is the presence of the chemical potential which induces a mass splitting between the doublets ( @xmath15 ) and ( @xmath16 ) so that the first one acquire the effective mass @xmath40 whereas the effective mass for the second one becomes @xmath41 .
the couplings may in general depend not only on running scale but also on the magnitude of the condensate so that we define the total derivative as @xmath42 where @xmath43 .
applying this to the effective potential and neglecting higher order terms gives the set of the flow equations @xmath44 the actual flow is determined by the choice of the cut - off function @xmath45 . in this exploratory study we have chosen the cut - off in the form suggested in @xcite @xmath46 the advantage of this form of cut - off is that it simplifies some algebra , allowing part of the calculations to be carried out analytically .
one notes , however that this advantage may disappear for more complicated cases like , for example , in the mixed boson - fermion systems . to solve the system of the flow equations one needs to fix a set of initial conditions .
they were determined as follows .
one starts from the effective action in vacuum where @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 and @xmath50 is determined by the value of kaon - kaon scattering length in vacuum .
the flow equations in vacuum can easily be obtained from the general expression for the @xmath51 by differentiating it with respect to @xmath52 and @xmath53 and putting @xmath54 , @xmath55 afterwards .
for example , the flow equation for the couplings @xmath56 and @xmath57 take the form @xmath58 = 510 mev , 550 mev and 595 mev correspondingly.,width=453 ] and @xmath59 the flow equations for the other couplings can be obtained in a similar way .
the value of @xmath60 is found to be very small at @xmath61 compared to the lower order couplings and the coupling @xmath62 does not really run in vacuum so that we put @xmath63 at starting scale .
these equations are solved using the values of couplings at @xmath6 as initial conditions . from the vacuum flow the values of the couplings at the starting scale for the general flow @xmath64
are extracted .
the value of the scale @xmath65 is chosen to be much larger then any other mass scale involved in the problem .
we have taken the value @xmath66 gev as the starting scale .
it is large enough to provide practically independent results for the couplings at the physical scale @xmath67 . at the scale @xmath68 the mass term approaches zero thus signaling the onset of spontaneous symmetry breaking ( ssb ) .
the corresponding vacuum expectation value of the field @xmath13 becomes nonzero and the system undergoes phase transition .
we show on fig.1 the behaviour of the mass term in the vicinity of the critical scale at several values of the chemical potential .
the critical value of the chemical potential for such a transition is found to be at @xmath69 as it should . at the scale @xmath70 3 gev the curves merge and follow this pattern up to starting point .
the change of the transition point as a function of the chemical potential is such that it grows with the increase of the chemical potential but , in any case the system undergoes the transition to the broken phase at the scale @xmath71 . at this scale the mass term vanishes and
the condensate develops . on the other hand the character of
the change of the mass term for the other fields in @xmath72 is such that it stays positive for any scale so that ssb never happens .
one may , therefore conclude that , whereas @xmath73 and @xmath74 mesons condense , the pair of the @xmath75 and @xmath76 mesons does not in agreement with the results from @xcite and @xcite .
one notes that the mechanism of the condensation considered in this paper and in refs .
@xcite is related to an instabilities in the colour - flavour locked phase of qcd @xcite is therefore quite different from the conventional condensation of @xmath76 mesons suggested in @xcite which is related to attractive interaction between @xmath76 mesons and nucleons .
corresponding to kaon - kaon scattering lengths from the lattice calculations @xcite(upper curve ) , lowest order chiral perturbation theory @xcite ( middle curve ) and phenomenological model @xcite ( lower curve),width=381 ] .
in fig.2 we show the behaviour of the condensate as the function of chemical potential at physical scale when @xmath77 and for three values of the @xmath78 coupling .
as one can see from fig.2 the value of the condensate grows with the increase of the chemical potential in all three cases .
this growth is relatively fast at the threshold @xmath79 and then slows down for the larger values of the chemical potential .
we note however that the results become less reliable with an increase of the chemical potential as the energy / momentum dependence of the couplings neglected in this study may become progressively more important at larger @xmath53 .
the important ingredient of the approach is the running coupling @xmath78 , which is related to the kaon - kaon scattering length . to get the results shown by the upper curve on fig.2 we used the value for the scattering length obtained in the lattice calculations @xmath80=
-0.310 @xmath81 , @xcite .
the middle curve corresponds to the use of the lowest order chiral perturbation theory result @xmath82 @xcite and the lower one is obtained using the phenomenological model from ref .
@xcite .
one can see from fig.2 that the difference between the results is quite noticeable , especially at the threshold .
it becomes less sensitive to the kaon - kaon interaction at the chemical potentials significantly larger then kaon mass but then using energy / momentum independent interaction vertices may not be sufficient . taking into account the next to leading order in chiral perturbation theory does not make this difference any smaller . on the contrary , the next - to - leading order chiral perturbation theory leads to even larger deviation from the lattice results .
in any case the chiral perturbation theory based estimates are not very reliable as @xmath83 chiral perturbation theory does not converge well and some sort of resummation techniques are probably required like those developed for the kaon - nucleon scattering @xcite .
overall one can conclude that the @xmath78 coupling generates a significant source of the theoretical uncertainty related to a poor knowledge of the kaon - kaon scattering amplitude at threshold . on the other hand
this quantity is important for establishing the correct equation of state ( e0s ) for neutron stars . in the present work
we have used the frg approach to analyse the phenomena of kaon condensation .
we found that at @xmath84 the system undergoes the transition to the broken phase with a nontrivial vacuum resulting in formation of the condensate .
however the exact value of the condensate ca nt in present be determined accurately because of lack of knowledge about the magnitude of the kaon - kaon scattering length .
there are several ways of how the approach can be extended and improved .
first , the energy / momentum dependence of the interaction vertices should be taken into account .
it may be important for estimation the effect of depletion of the condensate .
second , instead of rather toy model for effective action , used in this paper one can utilize a more realistic action based on effective lagrangian like that derived in ref .
@xcite .
the induced or effective chemical potential considered there will emerge as the result of the rg flow .
third , physically interesting case of competing chiral and kaon condensates can be considered .
apart from that it would be interesting to consider a mixed system with both kaon and pion condensates .
these condensates may influence each other via @xmath85 scattering which may have important consequences for the neutron stars eos .
the results for the mixed pion - kaon system will be reported in future publications . | the author is grateful to m. birse and n. walet for valuable discussions . | author grateful birse n walet discussions | 0.064933 | 18 | 8 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,781 | we have performed high resolution co(2 - 1 ) , co(1 - 0 ) , hcn(1 - 0 ) and hco@xmath0(1 - 0 ) observations of a `` low star formation efficiency starburst galaxy '' ngc 4527 with the nobeyama millimeter array .
the integrated intensity ratios , co(2 - 1)/co(1 - 0 ) and hcn(1 - 0)/co(1 - 0 ) , are found to be 0.6@xmath1 and 0.06@xmath2 , respectively , at the center .
these line ratios are smaller than those in prototypical starburst galaxies such as ngc 253 and m82 , and we suggest that the fraction of dense molecular gas to the total molecular mass in the central a few kpc region of ngc 4527 is small
. this fact may be responsible for the low star formation efficiency in the center of ngc 4527 .
-30 mm -14 mm ts shiba@nro.nao.ac.jp | ngc 4527 is a nearby spiral galaxy ( table 1 ) , and has been classified as a starburst galaxy because of it s abundant molecular gas ( @xmath3 ) and high _ star formation rate _ ( young & devereux 1991 ) .
however , young & devereux ( 1991 ) pointed out that the star formation rate per unit gas mass indicated by @xmath4 , the _ star formation efficiency _ , of ngc 4527 is very low compared with their starburst sample .
what controls the star formation properties in the central region of ngc 4527 ? in order to address the relationship between the physical conditions of molecular gas and star formation , we have performed high resolution multiple molecular emission observations in the central a few kpc region of ngc 4527 with the nobeyama millimeter array ( nma ) .
.properties of ngc 4527 .
reference ( 1)(2)hummel et al . 1987 ; ( 3 ) rubin et al . 1997 ; ( 4 ) tully 1988 ; ( 5)(6 ) young & devereux 1991 ; [ cols="<,<,<",options="header " , ]
the co(1 - 0 ) map in figure 1 shows two outstanding features .
one is the strong concentration of co emission toward the nucleus ( r @xmath5 5@xmath6 or 350 pc ) with a slight elongation along the major axis of the galaxy ( p.a .
= 64@xmath7 ) .
another feature is two offset ridges of co emission extends over r @xmath5 27@xmath6 ( 1800 pc ) along p.a . of 64@xmath7 .
the overall distribution of the co in ngc 4527 is very similar to that of barred spiral galaxies , which shows two offset ridges at the leading edges of a bar with a central concentration of gas ( e.g. , kenney et al . 1992 ) , although the optical morphology can not make clear whether the presence of the bar ( table 1 ) .
our co(1 - 0 ) map recovers about 80 % of a single dish flux ( young et al . 1995 ) .
molecular gas mass estimated from the observed co flux is about @xmath8 @xmath9 , and the peak molecular gas surface density , @xmath10 , at the center is @xmath11 @xmath9 pc@xmath12 adopting a galactic co - to - h@xmath13 conversion factor ( @xmath14@xmath15 ) .
this velocity width ( full width of zero intensity ) of 500 km s@xmath16 is the same as that of the single - dish line profiles obtained with the fcrao 14 m ( young et al . 1995 ) and nrao 12 m ( helfer & blitz 1993 ) .
the distribution of the co(2 - 1 ) emission resembles the co(1 - 0 ) map , although the extended ridges seen in co(1 - 0 ) map ( r @xmath5 27@xmath6 or 1800 pc ) do not appear in this co(2 - 1 ) map .
it is probably due to insufficient sensitivity of co(2 - 1 ) observations , and also the lack of short spacing .
the summary of co observations are listed in table 2 .
hcn(1 - 0 ) and hco@xmath0(1 - 0 ) emission concentrated toward the center have been detected .
extended components correspond to the co ridges may be also seen in the maps , although the s / n ratios are insufficient to make detail comparisons .
we assumed almost all the single dish flux is recovered in both hcn and hco@xmath0 maps , and the previous observations of hcn emission seems to support the validity of this assumption ( see helfer & blitz 1997 and kohno et al .
we summarize hcn and hco@xmath0 observations in table 2 .
the co(2 - 1 ) to co(1 - 0 ) integrated intensity ratio , @xmath17 , is a measure of dense gas fraction to the total molecular gas ( e.g. , sakamoto et al .
1994 ) , and sensitive in a density range of about 10@xmath18 - 10@xmath19 @xmath20 .
we convolved the co(1 - 0 ) map to the same beam size as that of the co(2 - 1 ) to calculate @xmath21 values .
the peak @xmath17 of about 0.6 at the center of ngc 4527 is somewhat smaller than @xmath17 values(@xmath22 ) in the central regions of spiral galaxies ( braine & combes 1992 ) , suggesting a presence of a large amount of low density molecular gas in this region .
note the observed @xmath17 could contain considerable error due to lack of single dish co(2 - 1 ) measurements , however .
a radial decrease of @xmath17 may be apparent ; the ratio is about 0.6 at the center , while the ratio decreases to 0.5 at r = 6@xmath6 ( 400 pc ) .
the hcn(1 - 0 ) to co(1 - 0 ) integrated intensity ratio , @xmath23 , is another measure of dense gas fraction to the total molecular gas ( e.g. , kohno et al .
1999 ) , and sensitive in a density range of about 10@xmath24 - 10@xmath25 @xmath20 .
the observed peak @xmath23 of 0.06 is significantly smaller than a @xmath23 values in starburst galaxies such as ngc 253 ( 0.2 @xmath26 ; e.g. , paglione et al . 1997 ; sorai 1997 ) and m82 ( @xmath27 ; shen & lo 1995 ) , and is similar to those in `` normal '' galaxies such as the galactic center ( @xmath28 ; paglione et al .
1998 ) . because stars are formed from dense cores of molecular clouds rather than their diffuse envelopes(e.g .
lada 1992 ) , study of dense molecular gas is essential to understand star formation in galaxies . in fact , good spatial coincidence between hcn and h@xmath29 emission has been reported in nearby starburst galaxies ( e.g. paglione et al .
1997 ; kohno et al 1999 ) .
both @xmath17 and @xmath23 suggest that the fraction of dense molecular clouds to the total molecular gas in the center of ngc 4527 is smaller than that of prototypical starburst galaxies such as ngc 253 and m82 .
it has been demonstrated that the fraction of dense molecular gas measured with the @xmath23 correlates with the star formation efficiency ( solomon et al .
1992 ) , which is indicated by @xmath30 . considering these results , we suggest that the small dense gas fraction is responsible for the low star formation efficiency in the center of ngc 4527 .
but the star formation rate of ngc 4527 would be enhanced existence of rich gas in central region .
aalto et al . 1995 , a&a , 300 , 369 | ngc 4527 nearby spiral galaxy classified starburst galaxy abundant molecular gas high star formation rate young devereux 1991 star formation rate per unit gas mass @xmath4 ngc 4527 low compared with starburst sample controls star formation properties central region ngc 4527 ? relationship molecular gas star formation performed high resolution molecular emission observations central region with nobeyama millimeter array.properties of ngc 4527 reference 1)(2)hummel et al 1987 rubin et al . 1997 tully 1988 young & devereux 1991 co(1 - 0 ) map figure 1 shows two features strong concentration of co emission toward nucleus slight elongation along major axis galaxy 64@xmath7 two offset ridges of co emission over r @xmath5 27@xmath6 along 64@xmath7 distribution co in ngc 4527 similar to barred spiral galaxies two offset ridges at leading edges bar central concentration of gas kenney et al 1992 optical morphology clear presence bar co(1 - 0 ) map recovers 80 % of single dish flux young et al . 1995molecular gas mass from co flux @xmath8 peak gas surface density center @xmath11 galactic co - to - h@xmath13 conversion factor @xmath14@xmath15 velocity width 500 km s@xmath16 same as single - dish line profiles fcrao 14 m nrao 12 m distribution co(2 - 1 ) emission resembles co(1 - 0 ) map extended ridges in co(1 - 0 ) map appear co(2 - 1 ) map due to insufficient sensitivity lack of short spacing summary co observations in table 2 hcn(1 - 0 ) hco@xmath0(1 - 0 ) emission toward center detected extended components co ridges maps s / n ratios insufficient single dish flux recovered in hcn hco@xmath0 maps previous observations hcn support summarize hcn hco@xmath0 observations in table 2 co(2 - 1 ) to co(1 - 0 ) integrated intensity ratio @xmath17 measure of dense gas fraction to total molecular gas sensitive in density range 10@xmath18 - 10@xmath19 @xmath20convolved co(1 - 0 ) map same beam size co(2 - 1 ) calculate @xmath21 values peak @xmath17 0.6 at center ngc 4527 smaller than @xmath17 values( ) in central regions spiral galaxies suggesting low density molecular gas observed @xmath17 could contain error due single dish co(2 - 1 ) measurements radial decrease of @xmath17 apparent ratio 0.6 at center decreases to 0.5 at r = 6@xmath6 ( 400 ) hcn(1 - 0 ) to co(1 - 0 ) integrated intensity ratio @xmath23 measure of dense gas fraction to total molecular gas sensitive in density range 10@xmath24 - 10@xmath25 @xmath20 peak @xmath23 0.06 smaller than @xmath23 values in starburst galaxies ngc 253 m82 similar to normal galaxies galactic center stars formed from dense molecular clouds study of dense molecular gas essential understand star formation good spatial coincidence between hcn and h@xmath29 emission reported in nearby starburst galaxies@xmath17 suggest dense clouds to gas ngc 4527 smaller than starburst galaxies ngc 253 m82 fraction dense gas correlates with star formation efficiency ( solomon et al . 1992 ) indicated by @xmath30 small dense gas fraction for low star formation efficiency ngc 4527 star formation rate 4527 rich gas in central region aalto et al . 1995 , 300 , 369 | 0.261768 | 1,595 | 813 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,783 | we consider a discretized version of the quenched edwards - wilkinson model for the propagation of a driven interface through a random field of obstacles .
our model consists of a system of ordinary differential equations on a @xmath0-dimensional lattice coupled by the discrete laplacian . at each lattice point , the system is subject to a constant driving force and a random obstacle force impeding free propagation .
the obstacle force depends on the current state of the solution and thus renders the problem non - linear . for independent and identically distributed obstacle strengths with exponential moment we prove ballistic propagation of the interface if the driving force is large enough | in this article , we consider a semi - discrete model for the evolution of a driven interface subject to line tension in a random , heterogeneous , quenched environment .
we prove that if the driving force is large enough then such an interface propagates with a positive velocity even if the random environment contains obstacles of arbitrarily large strength .
let @xmath1 be a probability space and consider the following lattice differential equation for the height @xmath2 of the @xmath3 dimensional interface in an ambient space of dimension @xmath4 , @xmath5 where @xmath6 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 , @xmath9 .
the initial condition is @xmath10 .
the operator @xmath11 denotes the discrete @xmath0-dimensional laplacian operator , namely @xmath12 , where @xmath13 denotes the discrete 1-norm .
the one - dimensional setting was discussed in @xcite , in this note we generalize our results to arbitrary dimension , albeit only for the ( semi-)discrete evolution .
we assume that @xmath14 , @xmath15 are independent and identically distributed functions such that the map @xmath16 is measurable with respect to the product of the borel-@xmath17 algebra on @xmath18 and @xmath19 and the map @xmath20 is locally lipschitz for almost all @xmath8 . furthermore , we assume that @xmath21 . disregarding infinitely fast growing unphysical solutions
, these assumptions guarantee that equation above admits a unique solution with non - negative velocity for every @xmath22 and that the solution depends measurably on @xmath23 for each @xmath24 .
the solution furthermore admits a comparison principle .
the main further assumption on the @xmath25 is that they admit a finite exponential moment .
as opposed to some other requirements , like independence , this assumption is central to our proof . under these conditions
, we can prove our main result .
[ thm : main ] assume in addition to the above requirements that there exists @xmath26 such that @xmath27 where @xmath28 denotes taking the integer ceiling of the argument .
then there exists a non - decreasing function @xmath29 which is not identically zero and which depends on @xmath30 and @xmath31 only , such that for all @xmath32 we have @xmath33 and therefore @xmath34 specifically , we can choose @xmath35 where @xmath36 denotes taking the integer floor of the argument .
the proof is split in two parts , first a discrete result arguing that there can be no discretized interface whose average velocity is small .
the second part is an application of this result to the coupled systems of odes .
taking @xmath37 large for small values of @xmath38 , one can see that @xmath39 for all @xmath40 .
furthermore , as @xmath38 becomes large , one can take @xmath37 closer to @xmath30 to see that there exists a constant @xmath41 , depending only on @xmath30 , @xmath31 , and @xmath0 , such that @xmath42 for all @xmath43 .
the main theorem also implies the following almost sure result for the point - wise velocity , excluding the existence of stationary solutions .
[ thm : limsup ] under the conditions of theorem [ thm : main ] we also have @xmath44 along any deterministic sequence of times @xmath45 as @xmath46 .
a model very similar to the one considered here was recently discussed in @xcite .
as opposed to our model , they use a fully discrete evolution , where in each time - step the system advances by one unit at every point where the total force is positive .
while some of their results are comparable to ours , they use a rigorous renormalization group approach to prove that in their model ( assuming also uniformly bounded obstacles ) , an interface is either completely blocked ( in the sense that a non - negative stationary solution exists ) or that it propagates ballistically , i.e. , there is no intermediate regime of sub - ballistic propagation . in more general models , like the one here
, this question remains open .
in particular , for the present model , we can only prove that there exist two critical values for the driving force : if the driving force is below the first value , the interface becomes stuck for all times .
if , on the other hand , the driving force is above the second value the interface propagates with finite velocity . the first result is a simple adaptation of our methods in @xcite and the second part is proved here .
generally , problems of the present form ( whether fully discrete , partially discrete , or fully continuous ) have received considerable interest in the physics community ( see for example @xcite ) .
many connections to questions arising from physics are discussed in the aforementioned article by bodineau and teixeira @xcite , as well as in @xcite , where the first rigorous result on non - existence of stationary states was derived .
the article is organized as follows . in section
[ sec : discrete ] , we show non - existence of states whose velocity is too small . in the following section [ sec : cont ] , we apply this result to prove our theorem .
we finish with some conclusions and an outlook in section [ sec : conc ] .
in this section , we prove the central lemma stating that in a fully discrete version of our model , one can with probability one not find any function whose average velocity is too small .
let thus now @xmath47 defined for all @xmath48 .
for convenience , we begin by introducing some notation .
we use the following abbreviations .
* @xmath49 , the @xmath0-dimensional cube of sites in @xmath50 of side - length @xmath51 , * @xmath52 , the @xmath17-algebra generated by the random functions in @xmath53 , * @xmath54 , any fixed number , later to be taken as the integer ceiling of an _ a priori _ bound on the maximal value the functions @xmath55 , solutions of can take at time @xmath56 , * @xmath57 , the set of admissible functions , * @xmath58 , the set of admissible functions within a cube @xmath59 , * @xmath60 , the size of the boundary layer around @xmath53 , * @xmath61 , the number of ways @xmath62 can be represented as the sum of @xmath63 ( ordered ) non - negative integers .
[ lem : discrete ] for each @xmath64 , there exists a set @xmath65 of full measure such that for any @xmath66 and any function @xmath67 we have @xmath68 and @xmath31 and @xmath30 are defined in theorem [ thm : main ] .
fix @xmath69 and consider for @xmath70 the sequence of random variables @xmath71 the basic underlying idea in this definition is the following .
we will show , using a martingale argument , that for sufficiently large @xmath38 the sequence @xmath72 almost surely vanishes exponentially in the size of the box @xmath53 .
for this decrease we can also establish a rate .
such a decrease , however , implies that as we look at larger and larger boxes around the origin , either the sum of the normal derivatives at the boundary of the box ( the first term in the exponential ) has to become large and negative quickly , or the sum of the velocities ( the second term in the exponential ) in @xmath53 has to increase with a rate related to the one with which @xmath72 vanishes .
the first option is excluded by the non - negativity of @xmath73 .
the second option yields the average velocity ( with a negative sign ) , after taking a logarithm and using the sum over all paths as an estimate for the supremum over all possible paths .
the first step in the proof is to relate the change in normal derivatives as @xmath74 increases to the addition of terms in the sum over the laplcian .
we use a discrete version of the divergence theorem , namely that @xmath75 and thus @xmath76 a calculation now yields @xmath77 where the sum in the second line is taken over all admissible extensions of @xmath73 to functions in @xmath78 .
taking now @xmath79 with the sum as above over all possible extensions , we get @xmath80 in order to estimate @xmath81 further , we need to rearrange and count the number of possible extensions . in the sum over all admissible extensions
we thus first take all extensions such that @xmath82 , calling these `` admissible extensions with velocity @xmath83 '' and then sum over all @xmath84 . in the case that there does not exist an admissible extension with velocity @xmath83 , we take the sum to be zero .
this yields @xmath85 where @xmath86 is the of the number of admissible extensions with velocity @xmath83 , depending on the realization of the random field @xmath87 and on @xmath73 from the previous step .
we also note that @xmath88 for @xmath89 is a fixed value inside the supremum , which allows us to use the assumption on the exponential moment of @xmath87 .
the idea for estimating @xmath90 now is the following : given @xmath83 , there are no more than @xmath91 possibilities to distribute these velocities on the @xmath92 sites . with all velocities fixed , for most sites in @xmath93 where the extension lives ,
the function value is determined due to the fact that @xmath23 and the velocity can be used to calculate the discrete laplacian ( if such a choice exists at all ) .
the number of sites where we still have freedom is @xmath94 .
we thus aim for an estimate of the type @xmath95 .
first notice that in dimension @xmath96 , there is no freedom to choose any additional values for the extension if the laplacian at the boundaries is given .
consider thus the case @xmath97 .
each given function value and the laplacian on the site can be used to write one independent linear equation for the function values on the extension , therefore the remaining number of sites with freedom is @xmath98 .
see the illustration in figure [ fig : extension ] for the two - dimensional case .
note that the number of choices for each of those nodes is limited to at most @xmath99 , and that @xmath100 .
since the above estimate was independent of @xmath101 and on @xmath102 , this yields @xmath103 using the estimate @xmath104 , the sum can be bounded as follows .
we have @xmath105 which , using @xmath106 yields @xmath107 we thus have @xmath108 for some constant @xmath41 .
equation together with the boundedness of @xmath81 and the almost sure finiteness of @xmath109 establishes that @xmath110 for @xmath111 is a non - negative supermartingale . from doob
s martingale convergence theorem we therefore find that @xmath112 on a set @xmath113 of full measure .
note furthermore that @xmath114 and thus @xmath115 where we have used that @xmath116 and dropped all terms that are of lower order than @xmath117 .
in particular , these are the terms in @xmath118 that are of lower order than @xmath119 as well as @xmath120 and the first sum inside the exponent in @xmath72 , which vanishes in the limit due to the boundedness of @xmath73 .
this proves the lemma .
the lemma from the above section allows us to complete the proof of the main theorem .
assume that the statement in the theorem is untrue .
then there exist @xmath121 and some @xmath122 such that @xmath123 . by our independence assumptions on the field @xmath87
, the processes @xmath124 , @xmath125 , @xmath15 are stationary and ergodic and take values in @xmath126 .
we write @xmath55 instead of @xmath124 . by birkhoff
s ergodic theorem , we have @xmath127 almost surely . however , taking @xmath88 to be @xmath55 rounded to the closest integer , we find @xmath128 by lemma [ lem : discrete ] .
the almost sure statement about the velocities can be derived by the following argument .
consider , for a fixed sequence of times @xmath45 , the random variables @xmath129 noting that @xmath130 is stationary , ergodic and bounded from above and below by @xmath38 and @xmath131 , respectively .
furthermore , we have @xmath132 , by fatou s lemma . by the non - negativity of the velocity and @xmath25
, it follows that @xmath133 for all @xmath134 and almost all @xmath23 , and therefore @xmath135 for almost all @xmath23 .
now let @xmath136 . by stationarity
, @xmath137 is constant in @xmath22 and we write @xmath138 . by the discrete divergence theorem , boundedness of @xmath130 and ergodicity of @xmath139 imply that @xmath140 and since @xmath135 for almost all @xmath23 we have @xmath141 almost surely and for all @xmath15 .
this yields that @xmath142 is a bounded , ergodic , and stationary process whose realizations are almost surely harmonic .
thus , @xmath142 is almost surely constant in @xmath22 and therefore @xmath143 is almost surely equal to its expected value .
the desired result follows .
in this note , we have extended our depinning result from @xcite to the case of arbitrary dimension in a semi - discrete model of coupled ordinary differential equations .
a careful inspection of the proof shows that one can furthermore extend our results to obstacle strengths coupled over a finite distance : if there exists @xmath144 such that sets of obstacles are independent if their distance ( in the first @xmath0-dimensions ) is above @xmath145 , one can still obtain similar estimates for the velocity .
the case of the fully continuous model on @xmath146 , however , remains open .
further unresolved issues are whether we have @xmath147 almost surely for sufficiently large @xmath38 , the relaxation of the result to obstacles with fat tails , as well as whether a regime of sub - ballistic propagation ( i.e. , vanishing velocity , but propagation of the interface to @xmath148 everywhere ) can exist in our models . as mentioned above , for a specific fully discrete evolution model this last question was answered recently @xcite . | consider semi - discrete model evolution driven interface line tension in random heterogeneous quenched environment prove if driving force large interface propagates positive velocity even environment obstacles large strength @xmath1 probability space consider lattice differential equation for height @xmath2 of @xmath3 dimensional interface in ambient space dimension @xmath4 initial condition @xmath10 operator @xmath11 denotes discrete @xmath0-dimensional laplacian operator @xmath12 @xmath13 denotes discrete 1-norm one - dimensional setting discussed generalize results to arbitrary dimension semi-)discrete evolution assume @xmath14 @xmath15 independent identically distributed functions map @xmath16 measurable product borel-@xmath17 algebra @xmath18 @xmath19 map @xmath20 locally lipschitz for @xmath8 assume @xmath21 guarantee equation admits unique solution non - negative velocity @xmath22 solution depends on @xmath23 for each @xmath24 solution admits comparison principle assumption @xmath25 finite exponential moment assumption central to proof prove main resultassume exists @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 integer ceiling argument exists non - decreasing function @xmath29 not identically zero depends on @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 choose @xmath35 @xmath36 integer floor argument proof split two parts discrete result no discretized interface average velocity small second application result to coupled systems odes taking @xmath37 large for small values of @xmath38 @xmath39 for all @xmath40 @xmath38 becomes large @xmath37 closer to @xmath30 constant @xmath41 depending on @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath0 @xmath42 for all @xmath43 main theorem implies almost sure result for point - wise velocity excluding stationary solutions under conditions theorem have @xmath44 deterministic sequence @xmath45 as @xmath46 model similar discussed in @xcite use fully discrete evolution each system advances one unit total force positivetheir results comparable to ours use rigorous renormalization group approach to prove model uniformly bounded obstacles interface blocked non - negative or propagates ballistically no intermediate regime sub - ballistic propagation in general models question remains open for present model prove two critical values for driving force if below first interface becomes stuck above second interface propagates with finite velocity first result adaptation of our methods in @xcite second proved here problems of present form fully discrete partially continuous received interest in physics community see @xcite ) connections to questions physics discussed in article by bodineau and teixeira @xcite @xcite first rigorous result on non - existence of stationary states derived article organized section [ : discrete show non - existence of states velocity too small following section apply result to prove theorem finish with conclusions outlook in section [ sec : conc ] prove central lemma in fully discrete version model not find function average velocity too small @xmath47 defined for all @xmath48 begin introducing notation use abbreviations .@xmath49 @xmath0-dimensional cube sites @xmath50 side - length @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath17-algebra random functions @xmath53 @xmath54 fixed number integer ceiling a priori bound maximal value functions @xmath55 solutions time @xmath56 @xmath57 set admissible functions @xmath58 within cube @xmath59 @xmath60 size boundary layer around @xmath53 @xmath61 number of ways @xmath62 sum of @xmath63 ordered non - negative integers @xmath64 set @xmath65 full measure @xmath66 function @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath31 @xmath30 defined in theorem fix @xmath69 consider @xmath70 sequence of random variables @xmath71 idea definition martingale argument large @xmath38 sequence @xmath72 vanishes exponentially in size box @xmath53 decrease establish rate decrease implies larger boxes origin sum normal derivatives at boundary box first term become large negative quickly or sum velocities second term in @xmath53 increase rate related @xmath72 vanishes first option excluded by non - negativity of @xmath73second option yields average velocity negative sign logarithm sum over paths estimate for supremum first step relate change in normal derivatives @xmath74 increases to addition terms sum over laplcian use discrete version divergence theorem @xmath75 @xmath76 calculation yields @xmath77 sum second line over extensions @xmath73 to functions @xmath78 @xmath79 sum over extensions get @xmath80 estimate @xmath81 rearrange count number extensions sum over admissible extensions take extensions @xmath82 with velocity @xmath83 sum over @xmath84 admissible extension with velocity @xmath83 sum zero yields @xmath85 where @xmath86 number of admissible extensions with velocity @xmath83 depending on realization random field @xmath87 @xmath73 @xmath88 for @xmath89 fixed value inside supremum assumption on exponential moment of @xmath87 estimating @xmath90 given @xmath83 no more than @xmath91 possibilities to distribute velocities on @xmath92 sites all velocities fixed most sites in @xmath93 extension lives function value determined due to @xmath23 velocity calculate discrete laplaciannumber of sites freedom is @xmath94 aim for estimate @xmath95 in dimension @xmath96 no freedom choose additional values if laplacian at boundaries given consider case @xmath97 each function value laplacian one independent linear equation for remaining sites with freedom is @xmath98 illustration figure two - dimensional case choices for limited to @xmath99 @xmath100 estimate independent of @xmath101 @xmath102 yields @xmath103 estimate @xmath104 sum bounded @xmath105 @xmath106 yields @xmath107 @xmath108 for constant @xmath41 boundedness of @xmath81 almost finiteness of @xmath109 @xmath110 for @xmath111 non - negative supermartingale s martingale convergence theorem @xmath112 on set @xmath113 full measure @xmath114 @xmath115 used @xmath116 dropped terms lower order than @xmath117 terms in @xmath118 lower @xmath119 @xmath120 first sum inside exponent in @xmath72 vanishes in limit due to boundedness of @xmath73 proves lemma proof of main theorem assume statement theorem untrueexist @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath123 independence assumptions @xmath87 processes @xmath124 @xmath15 stationary ergodic take values @xmath126 write @xmath55 instead @xmath124 birkhoff s ergodic theorem @xmath127 almost surely @xmath88 @xmath55 rounded closest integer find @xmath128 lemma discrete almost sure statement velocities derived argument consider fixed sequence @xmath45 random variables @xmath129 @xmath130 stationary ergodic bounded @xmath38 @xmath131 @xmath132 fatou s lemma non - negativity velocity @xmath25 @xmath133 @xmath134 @xmath23 @xmath135 @xmath23 @xmath136 stationarity @xmath137 constant @xmath22 write @xmath138 discrete divergence theorem boundedness @xmath130 ergodicity @xmath139 imply @xmath140 @xmath135 @xmath23 @xmath141 almost surely @xmath15 @xmath142 bounded ergodic stationary process realizations harmonic @xmath142 constant @xmath22 @xmath143 equal expected value desired result followsextended depinning result from @xcite to arbitrary dimension in semi - discrete model of coupled ordinary differential equations shows extend results to obstacle strengths over finite distance if @xmath144 distance above @xmath145 obtain similar estimates for velocity fully continuous model on @xmath146 remains open unresolved issues are @xmath147 for large @xmath38 relaxation of result to obstacles with fat tails regime sub - ballistic propagation vanishing velocity interface to @xmath148 in models for specific fully discrete evolution model last question answered recently @xcite | 0.500134 | 3,183 | 1,713 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,797 | we investigated the quantum gates of coupled quantum dots , theoretically , when charging effects can be observed .
we have shown that the charged states in the qubits can be observed by the channel current of the mosfet structure . | since shor s factorization program was proposed , many studies have been carried out in order to realize the quantum computer @xcite .
nakamura succeeded in the control of the macroscopic quantum state as the solid devices of josephson junctions@xcite .
recently , we have proposed the quantum computer in the asymmetric coupled dot in si nanocrystals@xcite .
the advantage of using the coupled dots attached by the gate electrode is that a quantum state can be controlled by the gate voltage in the solid circuits .
moreover , when the coupled si quantum dots are embedded in the gate insulator of the mosfet@xcite , the quantum state in the two coupled dots ( qubits ) is expected to be detected by the channel current . in the previous paper@xcite , we investigated the case where the sizes of si nanocystals were small such that the energy - levels in the quantum dots were discrete and the two - state system was constituted by the lowest energy - levels of the two quantum dots . here , in this paper , we consider the case where the sizes of the quantum dots are larger ( of the order of a few tens of nm ) and the energy - levels of the individual quantum dots are almost continuous@xcite .
we also assume that the charging energy of each tunneling junction is large enough that the coulomb blockade effects can be seen .
this was realized in the quantum gate of the josephson junction by shnirman@xcite and averin@xcite .
the superconducting state has the advantage from the viewpoint of the decoherence that the qubits are connected by the coherent circuits .
on the other hand , we use the normal state of the capacitively coupled quantum dots , because there exist some predictions that the decoherence time in the normal quantum dot array in semiconductors is not expected to be so short@xcite .
first , in this paper , we show that the capacitively coupled dots can be reduced to a two - state system of interacting two qubits .
next , we show the detecting mechanism of the quantum state by the channel current based on the conventional mosfet model .
asymmetry of the coupled dots is not assumed and we set @xmath0=1 .
the configuration of the quantum dots and capacitances are shown in fig.[fig1 ] .
we assume that the coupling between qubits is weaker than that in a qubit(the full formation of the electrostatic energy is shown in the appendix ) , and we take @xmath1 by this assumption , we can expand the charging energy as a function of @xmath2 and @xmath3 ( @xmath4 ) , by a small @xmath5 , and obtain the electrostatic energy : @xmath6 ^ 2 \nonumber \\
e_c\left[n_b\!+\!\frac{c_7\!-\!c_5}{c_5\!+\!c_7 } n \!-\!\frac{2c_5 c_7}{c_5\!+\!c_7 } v_b \right]^2 \label{eqn : u_1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath7 and @xmath8 if we consider the gate voltage region where the electrostatic energy of @xmath9 state crosses that of @xmath10 state described by shnirman@xcite and averin@xcite , the electrostatic energy and the tunneling amplitude , @xmath11 , constitute the hamiltonian of the two - state system as @xmath12 where @xmath13/(c_5+c_7))$ ] and @xmath14/(c_5+c_7))$ ] .
@xmath15 and @xmath16 are pauli matrices . when the capacitances are approximated as @xmath17 where @xmath18 , @xmath19
, @xmath20 is the size of the capacitance and @xmath21 is the radius of each quantum dot , then @xmath22 is of the order of tens of mev .
the mechanism of the controlled not operation is similar to that of the josephson junction@xcite . whether @xmath23 or @xmath24 , the level - crossing gate voltage , @xmath25 , shifts(see eq.([eqn : u_1 ] ) and the controlled not operation
is realized .
the dynamical motion of the excess charge in the two - state system can be easily considered by solving the time - dependent schrdinger equation@xcite , and the excess charge shows the oscillating behavior depending on the energy of the two states .
the time period of the oscillation , @xmath26 , can be simply approximated as @xmath27 .
the polarized charged state of a qubit ( coupled dots ) behaves as the dipole moment under the electric field generated by the gate electrode . by the coupling of the dipole with the electric field
, the two - state system can be described by the bloch equation and the quantum calculation is realized similar to the nmr quantum computer@xcite .
it is well known that the one of the attractive characteristics of the nmr quantum computer is its long decoherence time . here , we comment on the decoherence time of the semiconductor dot array .
the decoherence time in semiconductor dot array has been considered to be short .
this is the reason why shnirman@xcite and averin@xcite used the josephson effects in quantum gates .
the decoherence in this case is considered mainly to originate from the phonon environments , where the interaction between the two - state system and the phonon bath is largely given by a deformation potential@xcite .
the estimated decoherence time is not so short and of the order of @xmath28 secfrom the analysis based on the model of leggett@xcite .
this relatively long decoherence time will be related to the phonon bottleneck derived by zanardi@xcite .
we will have to include the effects of the higher excited energy - levels and temperature for more detailed estimation .
the qubit which changes the charge distribution can be detected by the mosfet structure .
mosfet structure@xcite is considered to be a more efficient detecting devise in semiconductor quantum dots compared to the set structure@xcite .
this is due to the change in the charge distribution in the qubit being detected by the capacitance effects similar to those of the quantum point contact@xcite . in this section ,
we show the detailed detecting mechanism of the mosfet based on the long - channel mosfet model in the case of two qubits .
the qubit system in the mosfet proposed here can be seen as series of single coupled - dot mosfets ( fig.[fig3 ] ) . when bias , @xmath29 , is applied between the source and drain
, the depletion region expands from the source and drain such that the width of the depletion region increases toward the drain .
thus , the channel current differs depending on the positions of the qubits which change the charge distribution .
the channel current between the @xmath30-th qubit and @xmath31-th qubit is given for a small @xmath29 region as@xcite , @xmath32(v_i\!-\!v_{i-1})\!-\ !
} \alpha ( v_i^2\!-\!v_{i-1}^2 ) \right),\ ] ] where @xmath33 ( @xmath34 is the channel width , @xmath35 is the mobility , @xmath36 is the channel length of @xmath30-th qubit where we set @xmath37 , and @xmath38 is the capacitance of the sio@xmath39 ) and @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the charge within the surface depletion region .
@xmath42 is the gate voltage , and the threshold voltage , @xmath43 , is given by @xmath44 where @xmath45 ( @xmath46 is a flat band voltage , @xmath47 is the potential difference between the fermi level and the intrinsic fermi level of substrate ) , and the shift by the change of the charge distribution , @xmath48 in the @xmath30-th qubit .
then , we have the following conditions : @xmath49 in the case of two qubits , with @xmath50 ( @xmath51 is assumed ) , @xmath52 thus , whether ( @xmath53 and @xmath54 ) or ( @xmath55 and @xmath56 ) , the difference of the corresponding currents , @xmath57 is given as @xmath58 this difference can be observed in the nonlinear @xmath59-@xmath29 region and , in the pure linear region where the terms which include @xmath60 disappear , the changed qubits can not be distinguished .
we have investigated the quantum gates of the capacitively coupled quantum dot array in the mosfet structure , and have derived the two - state hamiltonian by the capacitances of the quantum dots .
we also have shown the detecting mechanism of the mosfet structure by analyzing the channel current based on the conventional mosfet model .
the author is grateful to n. gemma , s. fujita , k. ichimura , and j. koga for fruitful discussions .
in this section we show the electrostatic energy of the two qubits in terms of the capacitances of dots and the gate electrodes ( fig .
[ fig1])@xcite .
we assume @xmath61 , @xmath62 , @xmath63 and @xmath64 .
the total electrostatic energy of the two qubits is given by @xmath65 where @xmath66 shows the charge of the @xmath30-th capacitance and we have the relation between @xmath67 and the total charge of the fore dots , @xmath68 , ... , @xmath69 as @xmath70 by minimizing the energy eq.([app1 ] ) at the fixed values of @xmath25 , @xmath71 and @xmath72 , we have @xmath73 ^ 2 \!\!\!+\!\ ! \frac{c_c}{4(\!c_c c_d\!\!-\!\!(\!c_6\!\!-\!\!c_3\!)^2 ) } ( c_7 v^+)^2 \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath74 and @xmath75 , @xmath76 , @xmath77/ [ ( c_5 + c_6+\eta c_3)(c_6+c_7+\varrho c_3)-(c_6-c_3)^2]$ ] and @xmath78 . | shor s factorization program proposed studies carried out realize quantum computer @xcite nakamura macroscopic quantum state solid devices josephson junctions proposed quantum computer in asymmetric coupled dot in si nanocrystals advantage of using coupled dots attached by gate electrode quantum state controlled by gate voltage solid circuits coupled si quantum dots embedded in gate insulator mosfet quantum state detected by channel current previous paper investigated case sizes si nanocystals small energy - levels dots discrete two - state system constituted by lowest energy - levels paper consider case sizes quantum dots larger few tens of nm energy - levels almost continuous assume charging energy of each tunneling junction large coulomb blockade effects seen realized in quantum gate josephson junction by shnirman averin@xcite superconducting state advantage decoherence qubits connected by coherent circuits use normal state of capacitively coupled quantum dots predictions decoherence time normal quantum dot array not short paper capacitively coupled dots reduced to two - state system of interacting two qubitsshow detecting mechanism quantum state by channel current conventional mosfet model asymmetry coupled dots not assumed set @xmath0=1 configuration quantum dots capacitances shown in fig. assume coupling between qubits weaker qubit full formation electrostatic energy shown in appendix ) take @xmath1 expand charging energy function @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 small @xmath5 obtain electrostatic energy : @xmath6 ^ 2{aligned @xmath7 @xmath8 gate voltage region electrostatic energy @xmath9 state crosses @xmath10 state electrostatic energy tunneling amplitude @xmath11 constitute hamiltonian two - state system as @xmath12 @xmath13/(c_5+c_7)) @xmath14/(c_5+c_7))$ ] @xmath15 @xmath16 are pauli matrices capacitances approximated as @xmath17 @xmath18 size capacitance radius of each quantum dot @xmath22 order tens of mev .mechanism controlled not operation similar to josephson junction@xcite @xmath23 or @xmath24 level - crossing gate voltage @xmath25 shifts controlled not operation realized dynamical motion excess charge in two - state system considered by solving time - dependent schrdinger equation excess charge shows oscillating behavior depending on energy two states time period oscillation @xmath26 approximated as @xmath27 polarized charged state of qubit behaves as dipole moment under electric field gate electrode coupling dipole with electric field two - state system described by bloch equation quantum calculation realized similar to nmr quantum computer@xcite nmr quantum computer long decoherence time on decoherence time semiconductor dot array short shnirman and averin@xcite used josephson effects in quantum gates decoherence from phonon environments interaction deformation potential estimated decoherence time not @xmath28 secfrom long decoherence time related to phonon bottleneck by zanardi@xcite include effects of higher excited energy - levels and temperature for detailed estimationqubit changes charge distribution detected by mosfet structure mosfet structure@xcite efficient detecting in semiconductor quantum dots compared to set structure@xcite due to change charge distribution detected by capacitance effects similar to quantum point contact@xcite show detailed detecting mechanism of mosfet long - channel mosfet model two qubits qubit system seen as series single coupled - dot mosfets ( fig.[fig3 when bias @xmath29 applied between source drain depletion region expands width increases toward drain channel current differs depending on positions of qubits change charge distribution channel current between @xmath30-th and @xmath31-th qubit for small @xmath29 region as@xcite @xmath32 where @xmath33 channel width mobility channel length of @xmath30-th qubit capacitance of@xmath39 @xmath41 is charge within surface depletion region@xmath42 gate voltage threshold voltage @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 flat band voltage @xmath47 potential difference fermi level intrinsic fermi level substrate shift charge distribution @xmath48 @xmath30-th qubit conditions @xmath49 two qubits @xmath50 @xmath51 assumed @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 difference corresponding currents @xmath57 @xmath58 difference observed nonlinear @xmath59-@xmath29 region pure linear region @xmath60 disappear changed qubits distinguished investigated quantum gates coupled quantum dot array mosfet structure derived two - state hamiltonian capacitances quantum dots shown detecting mechanism mosfet structure channel current conventional mosfet model author grateful n. gemma s. fujita k. ichimura j. koga discussions electrostatic energy two qubits capacitances dots gate electrodes assume @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64total electrostatic energy two qubits by @xmath65 @xmath66 shows charge @xmath30-th capacitance relation between @xmath67 total charge fore dots @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 minimizing energy eq. fixed values @xmath25 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 c_7 v^+)^2{aligned @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 c_5 + c_6+ c_3)(c_6+c_7+\varrho c_3)-(c_6-c_3) @xmath78 | 0.350869 | 2,282 | 1,147 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,809 | we have searched for a cp violation signature arising from an electric dipole moment ( @xmath0 ) of the @xmath1 lepton in the @xmath2 reaction . using an optimal observable method and 29.5 fb@xmath3 of data collected with the belle detector at the kekb collider at @xmath4 gev
, we find @xmath5 and @xmath6 and set the 95% confidence level limits @xmath7 and @xmath8 . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and tau , electic dipole moment , cp violation , optimal observable 13.40.gp , 13.35.dx , 14.60.fg | while large cp violating asymmetry has recently been confirmed in b - meson decay @xcite , the standard model ( sm ) does not predict any appreciable cp violation ( cpv ) in the lepton sector .
however , physics beyond the sm could produce cpv in leptonic processes ; we would expect such effects to be enhanced for @xmath1 leptons due to their large mass .
parameterizing cpv in @xmath1-pair production by an electric dipole moment @xmath0 , several authors have found possible effects of order @xmath9 cm due to new physics models @xcite .
the best existing bounds on @xmath0 are indirect , requiring @xmath10 cm based on naturalness arguments @xcite and precision lep data @xcite.cm has also been derived from the experimental limits on @xmath11 decay @xcite .
we note , however , that this result assumes a particular ansatz for the lepton mixing matrix . in a recent preprint @xcite
, other authors have argued that the same constraint may be derived under weaker assumptions . ]
previous direct measurements have been performed at lep , where l3 @xcite found @xmath12 cm and opal @xcite found @xmath13 cm , using the process @xmath14 ; and by argus @xcite , which set limits @xmath15 cm and @xmath16 cm based on a study of @xmath17 production . in this paper
we present the first direct measurement of the @xmath1 lepton s electric dipole moment with a sensitivity in the @xmath18 cm range .
we improve on the sensitivity of argus by an order of magnitude , by reducing the systematic uncertainty in the extraction of @xmath0 , and by analyzing a much larger sample of events .
we adapt the so - called optimal observable method @xcite , which maximizes the sensitivity to @xmath0 . here
the optimal observables are defined as @xmath41 the mean value of the observable @xmath42 is given by @xmath43 where the integration is over the phase space ( @xmath44 ) spanned by the relevant kinematic variables .
the cross - term containing the integral of the product of @xmath45 and @xmath46 drops out because of their different symmetry properties .
the expression for the imaginary part is similar .
the means of the observables @xmath47 and @xmath48 are therefore linear functions of @xmath49 , @xmath50 eight different final states in the decay of @xmath1-pairs , @xmath51 , @xmath52 , @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 , and @xmath58 , are analyzed , where all particles except @xmath59 and @xmath60 are positively or negatively charged .
because of the undetectable particles , we can not fully reconstruct the quantities @xmath32 and @xmath34 .
therefore , for each event we calculate possible kinematic configurations and obtain the mean value of @xmath61 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 by averaging over the calculated configurations . in the case when both @xmath1 leptons decay hadronically ( @xmath62 or @xmath63 ) , the @xmath1 flight direction is calculated with a two - fold ambiguity @xcite and we take the average of @xmath61 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 over the two solutions . in the case
when either one or both @xmath1 leptons decay leptonically ( @xmath64 or @xmath65 ) , a monte carlo ( mc ) treatment is adopted to take into account the additional ambiguity in the effective mass of the @xmath66 system ( @xmath67 ) . for each event we generate 100 mc configurations using a hit - and - miss approach by varying @xmath67 , and compute the averaged @xmath61 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 over successful tries in which the @xmath1 direction can be constructed kinematically . in the calculation
, we ignore the effect of undetected photons coming from initial state radiation , radiative @xmath1 decays and bremsstrahlung .
the resulting bias in @xmath0 is included among the systematic errors ; the effect on the final result is negligible .
in this analysis , we use 26.8 million @xmath1-pairs ( @xmath68 ) accumulated with the belle detector @xcite at the kekb accelerator @xcite .
kekb is an asymmetric energy @xmath69 collider with a beam crossing angle of 22 mrad .
its center - of - mass energy is 10.58 gev , corresponding to the @xmath70 resonance , with beam energies of 8 and 3.5 gev for electrons and positrons , respectively .
belle is a general - purpose detector with an asymmetric structure along the beam direction . among the detector elements , the central drift chamber ( cdc ) and the silicon vertex detector ( svd ) are essential to obtain the momentum vectors of charged particles . the combined information from the silica aerogel cherenkov counters ( acc ) , the time - of - flight counters ( tof ) , the csi electromagnetic calorimeter ( ecl ) , and the @xmath71 detector ( klm ) is used for particle identification .
the mc event generators koralb / tauola @xcite are used for @xmath1-pair production and decays .
the detector simulation is performed with a geant - based program , gsim .
actual data and mc generated events are reconstructed by the same program written by the belle collaboration .
.yield , purity and background rate obtained for the event selection described in the text , where the purity is evaluated by mc simulation and its error comes from mc statistics . [
cols="^,>,^,<",options="header " , ] finally , we obtain mean values for @xmath72 and @xmath73 over the eight different @xmath74 modes weighted by quadratically summed statistical and systematic errors , @xmath75 with corresponding 95% confidence limits @xmath76 we would like to thank professors k. hagiwara , o. nachtmann , and z. was for their constructive advice and many helpful discussions .
we also wish to thank the kekb accelerator group for the excellent operation of the kekb accelerator .
we gratefully acknowledge the support from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science , and technology of japan , grant - in - aid for jsps fellows 01655 2001 , and the japan society for the promotion of science ; the australian research council and the australian department of industry , science and resources ; the national science foundation of china under contract no .
10175071 ; the department of science and technology of india ; the bk21 program of the ministry of education of korea and the chep src program of the korea science and engineering foundation ; the polish state committee for scientific research under contract no .
2p03b 17017 ; the ministry of science and technology of the russian federation ; the ministry of education , science and sport of the republic of slovenia ; the national science council and the ministry of education of taiwan ; and the u.s .
department of energy .
99 k. abe et al .
( belle collaboration ) , phys .
87 ( 2001 ) 091802 ; phys .
d 66 ( 2002 ) 032007
. b. aubert et al .
( babar collaboration ) , phys .
87 ( 2001 ) 091801 ; phys .
d 66 ( 2002 ) 032003 .
t. huang , w. lu , and z. tao , phys .
d 55 ( 1997 ) 1643 .
w. bernreuther , a. brandenburg , and p. overmann , phys .
b 391 ( 1997 ) 413 ; ibid . ,
b 412 ( 1997 ) 425 .
k. akama , t. hattori , and k. katsuura , phys .
88 ( 2002 ) 201601 .
r. escribano and e. mass , phys .
b 301 ( 1993 ) 419 ; nucl . phys .
b 429 ( 1994 ) 19 ; phys .
b 395 ( 1997 ) 369 .
t. huang , z. h. lin , and x. zhang , phys .
b 450 ( 1999 ) 257 .
j. q. zhang , x. c. song , w. j. huo , and t. f. feng , hep - ph/0205309 . m. acciarri et al .
( l3 collaboration ) , phys .
b 434 ( 1998 ) 169 .
k. ackerstaff et al .
( opal collaboration ) , phys .
b 431 ( 1998 ) 188 . h. albrecht et al .
( argus collaboration ) , phys .
b 485 ( 2000 ) 37 .
w. bernreuther , o. nachtmann , and p. overmann , phys .
d 48 ( 1993 ) 78 .
d. atwood and a. soni , phys .
d 45 ( 1992 ) 2405 . k. ackerstaff et al .
( opal collaboration ) , z. phys .
c 74 ( 1997 ) 403 .
a. abashian et al .
( belle collaboration ) , nucl .
instr . and meth . a 479 ( 2002 ) 117 .
e. kikutani ed .
, kek preprint 2001 - 157 ( 2001 ) , to appear in nucl .
instr . and meth .
a. koralb(v.2.4)/tauola(v.2.6 ) : s. jadach and z. was , comp .
85 ( 1995 ) 453 ; ibid . , 64 ( 1991 ) 267 ;
36 ( 1985 ) 191 ; s. jadach , z. was , r. decker , and j.h .
khn , comp .
commun . 64
( 1991 ) 275 ; ibid .
, 70 ( 1992 ) 69 ; ibid . , 76 ( 1993 ) 361 .
k. hanagaki et al . , nucl .
instr . and meth . a 485 ( 2002 ) 490 . | large cp violating asymmetry confirmed in b - meson decay standard model predict cp violation in lepton sector physics beyond sm could produce cpv in leptonic processes effects enhanced for @xmath1 leptons due to large mass parameterizing cpv in @xmath1-pair by electric dipole moment @xmath0 authors found effects @xmath9 cm due to new physics models bounds on @xmath0 indirect requiring @xmath10 cm naturalness arguments precision data derived from experimental limits on @xmath11 decay result assumes ansatz for lepton mixing matrix authors argued constraint may derived under weaker assumptions previous measurements performed at lep found @xmath12 cm @xmath13 cm argus limits @xmath15 cm cm first direct measurement of @xmath1 lepton s electric dipole moment with sensitivity in @xmath18 cm range sensitivity order magnitude systematic uncertainty in extraction @xmath0 larger sample optimal observable method maximizes sensitivity to @xmath0optimal observables defined as @xmath41 mean value @xmath42 by @xmath43 integration over phase space @xmath44 kinematic variables cross - term integral product @xmath45 @xmath46 drops out different symmetry properties expression imaginary part similar means observables @xmath47 @xmath48 linear functions of @xmath49 @xmath50 eight final states in decay of @xmath1-pairs analyzed all particles except @xmath59 @xmath60 positively or negatively charged undetectable particles reconstruct quantities @xmath32 @xmath34 event calculate possible kinematic configurations obtain mean value of @xmath61 @xmath45 @xmath46 by averaging over calculated configurations @xmath1 leptons decay hadronically @xmath1 flight direction calculated with two - fold ambiguity average of @xmath61 @xmath46 over two solutions one @xmath1 leptons decay leptonically monte carlo treatment adopted additional ambiguity in effective mass @xmath66 systemevent generate 100 mc configurations hit - - miss approach varying @xmath67 compute averaged @xmath61 tries direction ignore undetected photons initial state radiation radiative @xmath1 decays bremsstrahlung bias in @xmath0 systematic errors effect final result negligible use 26.8 million @xmath1-pairs belle detector kekb accelerator kekb asymmetric energy @xmath69 collider beam crossing angle 22 mrad center - of - mass energy 10.58 gev @xmath70 resonance beam energies 8 3.5 gev electrons positrons belle general - purpose detector asymmetric structure beam direction central drift chamber silicon vertex detector essential momentum vectors charged particles combined information silica aerogel cherenkov counters time - of - flight counters electromagnetic calorimeter @xmath71 detector particle identification mc event generators koralb / tauola @xcite for @xmath1-pair production decays detector simulation geant - based program gsim data events reconstructed program belle collaborationyield purity background rate event selection text purity evaluated by mc simulation error from mc statistics mean values @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 modes weighted by statistical errors @xmath75 95% confidence limits @xmath76 professors hagiwara nachtmann z. was for advice discussions kekb accelerator group operation support ministry of education culture sports science technology japan grant - in aid jsps fellows japan society promotion science australian research council department of industry science resources national science foundation china department of science technology india bk21 program ministry education korea program science engineering foundation polish state committee scientific research ministry science technology russian federation ministry education slovenia national science council ministry education taiwan u.s . department of energy. abe et al . belle collaboration phys . 87 ( 2001 ) 091802 ; d 66 ( 2002 ) 032007 b. aubert et al babar collaboration phys . 87 2001 ) 091801 66 2002 ) 032003 t. huang w. lu z. tao phys . d 55 ( 1997 ) 1643bernreuther brandenburg overmann phys . 391 ( 1997 ) 413 ibid 412 1997 ) 425 akama hattori katsuura phys . 88 ( 2002 ) 201601 escribano mass . 301 ( 1993 ) 419 429 ( 1994 ) 19 395 1997 ) 369 huang lin x zhang 450 ( 1999 ) 257 zhang song huo f feng/0205309 acciarri collaboration phys 434 ( 1998 ) 169 ackerstaff opal collaboration phys 431 1998 ) 188 albrecht argus collaboration phys 485 ( 2000 ) 37 nachtmann p overmann phys . 48 ( 1993 ) 78 atwood soni . 45 ( 1992 ) 2405 ackerstaff opal collaboration . 74 ( 1997 ) 403 abashian belle collaboration nucl instr . 479 ( 2002 ) 117 kikutani preprint 2001 - 157 2001 koralb(v.2.4)/tauola(v.2.6 jadach z was comp . 85 ( 1995 ) 453 ibid64 1991 ) 267 36 1985 191 jadach was decker khn comp. commun 64 1991 275 70 1992 ) 69 76 ( 1993 ) 361 hanagaki nucl. instr. meth 485 ( 2002 ) 490 | 0.350791 | 2,357 | 1,171 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,814 | in this work , a boundary value problem for sturm - liouville operator with discontinuous coefficient is examined .
the main equation is obtained which has an important role in solution of inverse problem for boundary value problem and uniqueness of its solution is proved .
uniqueness theorem for the solution of the inverse problem is given .
[ multiblock footnote omitted ] [ multiblock footnote omitted ] | in many practices , spectral problems are faced for differential equations which have discontinuous coefficient and discontinuity conditions in interval ( @xcite-@xcite ) .
these problems generally emerge in physics , mechanics and geophysics in non - homogeneous and discontinuous environments .
we consider a heat problem in a rod which is composed of materials having different densities . in the initial time , let the temperature is given arbitrary .
let be the temperature is zero in one end of the rod and the heat is isolated at the other end of the rod . in this case
the heat flow in non - homogeneous rod is expressed with the following boundary problem : @xmath0 @xmath1 where @xmath2 , @xmath3 are physical parameters and have specific properties .
for instance , @xmath2 defines the density of the material and piecewise - continuous function . applying the method of separation of variables to this problem
, we get the spectral problem below : @xmath4 @xmath5 here @xmath6 is a real - valued function , @xmath2 piecewise - continuous function the following : @xmath7 @xmath8 is spectral parameter and @xmath9 . when @xmath10 or @xmath11 , that is , in continuous case , the solution of inverse problem is given in @xcite-@xcite .
the spectral properties of sturm - liouville opeator with discontinuos coefficient in different boundary conditions are examined in @xcite-@xcite . in this study ,
the main equation is obtained which has an important role in solution of inverse problem for boundary value problem and according to spectral data , the uniqueness of solution of inverse problem is proved .
similar problems are examined for the equation ( [ 1 ] ) with different boundary conditions in @xcite .
it was proved ( see @xcite ) , that the solution @xmath12 of the equation ( [ 1 ] ) with initial conditions @xmath13 @xmath14 can be represented as @xmath15 where @xmath16 belongs to the space @xmath17 for each fixed @xmath18 $ ] and is related with the coefficient @xmath19 of the equation ( [ 1 ] ) by the formula:@xmath20@xmath21is the solution of ( [ 1 ] ) when @xmath22@xmath23it is similarly shown in @xcite , @xcite that the roots of the equation @xmath24 have the following form @xmath25where @xmath26 are the eigenvalues of problem ( [ 1 ] ) , ( [ 2 ] ) when @xmath27 , @xmath28 is a bounded sequence , @xmath29 and norming constants : @xmath30
for each fixed @xmath18 $ ] the kernel @xmath16 from the representation ( [ 4 ] ) satisfies the following linear functional integral equation @xmath31@xmath32where@xmath33@xmath34@xmath26 are eigenvalues and @xmath35 are norming constants of the boundary value problem ( [ 1 ] ) , ( [ 2 ] ) when @xmath36 from ( [ 4 ] ) we have@xmath37it follows from ( [ 4 ] ) and ( [ 11 ] ) that@xmath38@xmath39@xmath40@xmath41@xmath42@xmath43@xmath44@xmath45using the last two equalities , we obtain@xmath46@xmath40@xmath47@xmath42@xmath48or@xmath49where@xmath50@xmath51@xmath52@xmath53@xmath54it is easily found by using ( [ 9 ] ) and ( [ 10])@xmath55let @xmath56 be an absolutely continuous function , @xmath57 then using expansion formula ( see @xcite),@xmath58@xmath59using ( [ 13 ] ) we have:@xmath60@xmath61@xmath62@xmath63we obtain uniformly on @xmath18$]@xmath64@xmath65@xmath66it follows from ( [ 6 ] ) that @xmath67 taking into account ( [ 16 ] ) and ( [ 13 ] ) , we get @xmath68 @xmath69@xmath70@xmath71@xmath72@xmath73@xmath74@xmath75@xmath76@xmath77@xmath78@xmath79@xmath80@xmath81substituting @xmath82 and @xmath83 we obtain @xmath84@xmath85@xmath86since @xmath87 when @xmath88 , we have @xmath89@xmath90@xmath91thus , uniformly on @xmath18:$]@xmath92@xmath93using ( [ 9 ] ) , uniformly on @xmath18$]@xmath94@xmath95@xmath96@xmath97@xmath96@xmath98using the residue theorem and the formula @xmath99 ( see @xcite ) , where @xmath100 is the solution of ( [ 1 ] ) with initial condition @xmath101 @xmath102 and @xmath103 is the characteristic function of ( [ 1])-([3 ] ) , @xmath104 we calculate@xmath105@xmath106@xmath107@xmath108 dt=\]]@xmath109@xmath110@xmath111@xmath112@xmath113where @xmath114 since ( see @xcite)@xmath115(@xmath116 @xmath117 is a sufficiently small positive number ) and according to lemma 1.3.1 from @xcite@xmath118from the equality ( [ 19 ] ) we get @xmath119multiplying both sides of ( [ 12 ] ) by @xmath120 integrating from @xmath121 to @xmath122 , tending to limit when @xmath123 and using ( [ 14 ] ) , ( [ 15 ] ) , ( [ 17 ] ) , ( [ 18 ] ) and ( [ 20 ] ) we have @xmath124@xmath125since @xmath56 can be chosen arbitrarily , we obtain @xmath126@xmath127
for each fixed @xmath18 $ ] main equation ( [ 8 ] ) has a unique solution @xmath128 .
we show that for each fixed @xmath129 the equation ( [ 8 ] ) is equivalent to the equation of the form @xmath130 where @xmath131 is a completely continuous operator , @xmath132 is an identity operator in the space @xmath133 .
( when @xmath134 this fact is obvious . )
when @xmath129 rewrite ( [ 8 ] ) as @xmath135where@xmath136@xmath137 it is sufficient to prove that @xmath138 is invertible , i.e. has a bounded inverse in @xmath17 .
consider the equation @xmath139
@xmath140 i.e. @xmath141from here it is easily to obtain @xmath142we show that @xmath143 in fact , @xmath144@xmath145@xmath146@xmath147@xmath148@xmath149we put @xmath150 , when @xmath151 .
then @xmath152 so the operator @xmath138 is invertible in @xmath17 . then according to theorem 3 from @xcite ( see p. 275 ) it is sufficient to prove that the equation @xmath153@xmath154has only trivial solution @xmath155 let @xmath156 be a non - trivial solution of ( [ 22 ] ) .
then @xmath157 @xmath158 @xmath159 from ( [ 9 ] ) we have @xmath157 @xmath160 @xmath161 @xmath162 @xmath163 using ( [ 7 ] ) and ( [ 16 ] ) we obtain @xmath157 @xmath164 @xmath165 @xmath166 @xmath167 @xmath168 @xmath167 @xmath166 @xmath169 @xmath168 @xmath170 @xmath171 @xmath172 @xmath173 @xmath174 @xmath175 @xmath174 @xmath173 @xmath176 @xmath175 @xmath177 substituting @xmath178 in third , fourth , ninth , and tenth double integrals and @xmath179 in fifth , sixth , eleventh and twelfth double integrals we get @xmath157@xmath164@xmath165@xmath180@xmath181@xmath182@xmath181@xmath183@xmath184@xmath185@xmath186@xmath171@xmath187@xmath188@xmath189@xmath190@xmath191@xmath190@xmath192@xmath193@xmath194@xmath195from which we have @xmath157@xmath196@xmath197@xmath198@xmath197@xmath199@xmath200@xmath201@xmath202@xmath203@xmath204@xmath205@xmath204@xmath206@xmath207@xmath208@xmath209thus we obtain @xmath157@xmath210@xmath211using the parseval s equality @xmath212for the function @xmath213we have @xmath214or @xmath215since the system @xmath216 is compete in @xmath217 we have @xmath218i.e .
@xmath219 where the operator @xmath138 is defined by ( [ 21 ] ) . from invertibility of @xmath138 in @xmath220
we get @xmath221 let @xmath222 and @xmath223 be two boundary value problems and@xmath224then @xmath225.\ ] ] according to ( [ 9 ] ) and ( [ 10 ] ) @xmath226 and @xmath227 . then from the main equation ( [ 8 ] ) , we have @xmath228 .
it follows from ( [ 5 ] ) that @xmath229 @xmath18 $ ] .
using @xcite , we can transform the main equation ( [ 8 ] ) to the following equation : @xmath230 where @xmath231 and @xmath232 we assume that @xmath233 from the formula ( [ 24 ] ) , we obtain @xmath234 substituting ( [ 25 ] ) into the main equation ( [ 23 ] ) we obtain @xmath235,\ ] ] @xmath236 where @xmath237 substituting ( [ 26 ] ) into ( [ 27 ] ) we obtain @xmath238 using the ( [ 6 ] ) , we calculate the integral into last equation . then , we have @xmath239 where @xmath240 @xmath241+\ ] ] @xmath242.\ ] ] from ( [ 28 ] ) , @xmath243^{-1 } \quad , \quad 0<x < a \\
\varphi_0(x,\lambda_1)\left[1+\frac{1}{\pi}\phi(x,\lambda_1)\right]^{-1 } \quad , \quad a < x<\pi ,
\end{array } \right . \label{29}\ ] ] substituting ( [ 29 ] ) into ( [ 26 ] ) we get @xmath244^{-1 } \quad , \quad 0<x < a \\
-\frac{1}{\pi}\rho(t)\varphi_0(t,\lambda_1)\varphi_0(x,\lambda_1)\left[1+\frac{1}{\pi}\phi(x , lambda_1)\right]^{-1 } \quad , \quad a < x<\pi , \end{array}\right . \label{30}\ ] ] where @xmath245 and @xmath246 .
thus , we obtain the solution of main equation ( [ 8 ] ) .
if we use the formula ( [ 5 ] ) then , we obtain the potential @xmath19 .
this work is supported by the scientific and technological research council of turkey ( tubitak ) .
anderssen rs .
the effect of discontinuities in destiny and shear velocity on the asymptotic overtone structure of torsional eigenfrequencies of the earth .
, geophys .
j. r. astr . soc . ,
1977 , 50 , 303 - 309 .
aliev ba , yakubov ys .
solvability of boundary value problems for second - order elliptic differential - operator equations with a spectral parameter and with a discontinuous coefficient at the highest derivative .
differential equations , 2014 , 50(4 ) , 464475 .
altinisik n , kadakal m , mukhtarov o. eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of discontinuous sturm - liouville problems with eigenparameter dependent boundary conditions .
acta math . hung . , 2004 , 102(12 ) , 159175 . | spectral problems differential equations discontinuous coefficient conditions interval- emerge in physics mechanics geophysics non - homogeneous discontinuous environments heat problem in rod different densities temperature arbitrary zero one end heat isolated other end heat flow non - homogeneous rod expressed boundary problem : @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 physical parameters specific properties @xmath2 defines density piecewise - continuous function separation variables spectral problem @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 real - valued function @xmath2 piecewise - continuous function @xmath7 @xmath8 spectral parameter @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 continuous solution inverse problem in @xcite-@xcite spectral properties of sturm - liouville opeator with discontinuos coefficient different boundary conditions examined in @xcite- main equation obtained solution inverse problem boundary value problem uniqueness solution proved similar problems examined for equation ( [ 1 ] ) different boundary conditions in @xcite proved @xcite solution @xmath12 equation with initial conditions @xmath13 @xmath14 represented as @xmath15 @xmath16 belongs to space @xmath17 each fixed @xmath18 related with coefficient @xmath19 equation by formula@xmath20@xmath21is solution @xmath22@xmath23it shown in @xcite roots of equation @xmath24 form @xmath25where @xmath26 eigenvalues problem @xmath27 @xmath28 bounded sequence @xmath29 norming constants @xmath30 each fixed @xmath18 kernel @xmath16 representation satisfies linear functional integral equation @xmath31@xmath32where@xmath33@xmath34@xmath26 eigenvalues @xmath35 norming constants of boundary value problem @xmath36@xmath37it follows from@xmath38@xmath39@xmath40 equalities obtain@xmath46@xmath40@xmath47@xmath42@xmath48or@xmath49where@xmath50@xmath51@xmath52@xmath53@xmath54it found using@xmath55let @xmath56 continuous function @xmath57 expansion formula@xmath58@xmath59using have:@xmath60@xmath61@xmath62@xobtain uniformly @xmath18$ follows 6 ] ) @xmath67 [ 16 ] 13 ] ) get @xmath68 @xmath82 @xmath83 obtain @xmath84 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89@xmath90 uniformly @xmath18$@xmath92 [ 9 ] ) @xmath18$]@xmath94 residue theorem formula @xmath99 @xmath100 solution [ 1 ] ) initial condition @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath103 characteristic function [ 1])-([3 ] ) @xmath104 calculate@xmath105@xmath106@xmath109 @xmath114@xmath115@xmath116 @xmath117 small positive number lemma 1.3.1 @xcite equality 19 ] ) get @xmath119multiplying sides [ 12 ] ) @xmath120 integrating @xmath121 @xmath122 limit @xmath123 [ 14 ] ) 15 ] 17 ] 18 ] ) 20 ] ) @xmath124@xmath125since @xmath56 chosen arbitrarilyobtain @xmath126@xmath127 fixed @xmath18 equation 8 unique solution @xmath128 fixed @xmath129 equation 8 equivalent @xmath130 @xmath131 continuous operator @xmath132 identity operator space @xmath133 @xmath134 obvious @xmath129 rewrite @xmath135where@xmath136@xmath137 prove @xmath138 invertible bounded inverse @xmath17 consider equation @xmath139 @xmath140 obtain @xmath142we @xmath143 @xmath144@xmath145@xmath146@xmath147@xmath148 put @xmath150 @xmath151 @xmath152 operator @xmath138 invertible @xmath17 theorem 3 @xcite p. 275 prove equation @xmath153@xmath154has trivial solution @xmath155 @xmath156 non - trivial solution 22 ]@xmath157 [ 9 ] ) @xmath157 @xmath162 [ 7 ] ) 16 ] ) obtain @xmath157 substituting @xmath178 third fourth ninth tenth integrals @xmath179 fifth sixth eleventh twelfth integrals @xmath157@xmath164@xmath165@xmath180@xmath181@xmath182@xmath184@xmath185@xmath186@xmath171@xmath187@xmath188@xmath189@xmath190@xmath191@xmath194 @xmath157@xmath196@xmath197@xmath198@xmath197@xmath199@xmath200@xmath201@xmath202@xmath203@xmath204@xmath205@xmath207 obtain @xmath157@xmath210 parseval equality @xmath212for function @xmath214or system @xmath216 @xmath217 @xmath219 operator @xmath138 defined by ( [ 21 ] ) invertibility @xmath138 @xmath220 @xmath221 @xmath222 @xmath223 boundary value problems@xmath224then @xmath225 [ 9 ] [ 10 ] ) @xmath226 @xmath227 main equation [ 8 ] ) @xmath228 follows [ 5 ] ) @xmath229 @xmath18 @xcite transform main equation 8 @xmath230 @xmath231 @xmath232 @xmath233 formula 24 ] ) obtain @xmath234 substituting [ 25 ] ) main equation 23 ] obtain @xmath235 @xmath236 @xmath237 substituting [ 26 ] ) [ 27 ] ) obtain @xmath238 [ 6 ] ) calculate integral last equation @xmath239 @xmath240 @xmath241 @xmath242. [ 28 ] ) @xmath243^{-1\quad 0<x x<substituting 29 into 26 ] ) get @xmath244{-1 0<x < a{1{-1 a < x<\pi{array} @xmath245 @xmath246 solution main equation ( [ 8 ] ) formula 5 ] ) obtain potential @xmath19 supported by scientific technological research council turkey anderssen rs effect discontinuities destiny velocity on asymptotic structure torsional eigenfrequencies earth geophys 1977 , 50 , 303 - 309 aliev yakubov ys boundary value problems second - order elliptic differential - operator equations spectral parameter discontinuous coefficient highest derivative differential equations 2014 , 50(4 ) , 464475 altinisik kadakal mukhtarov eigenvalues eigenfunctions discontinuous sturm - liouville problems eigenparameter dependent boundary conditions math 2004 102(12 ) , 159175 | 0.428106 | 2,885 | 1,515 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,815 | we present monte carlo simulations of hysteresis loops of a model of a magnetic nanoparticle with a ferromagnetic core and an antiferromegnetic shell with varying values of the core / shell interface exchange coupling which aim to clarify the microscopic origin of exchange bias observed experimentally .
we have found loops shifts in the field direction as well as displacements along the magnetization axis that increase in magnitude when increasing the interfacial exchange coupling .
ovelap functions computed from the spin configurations along the loops have been computed to explain the origin and magnitude of these features microscopically . , magnetic nanoparticles ; exchange bias ; monte carlo simulation ; magnetic hysteresis 75.60.-d ; 05.10.ln ; 75.50.tt ; 75.60.jk | compound magnetic structures formed by a ferromagnet ( fm ) in close contact with an antiferromagnet ( afm ) show interesting proximity effects which are enhanced when going to the nanoscale range @xcite . among them , one of the most studied phenomenon is the displacement of the hysteresis loops along the field axis observed in layered fm / afm systems and core / shell nanoparticles when measured after cooling in a magnetic field , an effect that has been termed exchange bias ( eb ) after its first observation by meiklejohn and bean in co particles @xcite . in spite of the intensive research developed in the last decades , there are still many open issues to be understood and no clear - cut model has been able to account for all the observed phenomenology @xcite .
several recent experiments based on spectrocopic techniques @xcite have focused on the observation of the magnetization reversal at the fm / afm interface in different layered systems since it is widely accepted that the magnitude of the exchange bias field is related to the existence of uncompensated moments at the interface
. however , in nanoparticles with fm core / afm shell structure , details about the core / shell interface can not be accessed by these techniques and only indirect information about the magnetic order at the inerface can be gained by magnetization measurements . in this study , we present the results of monte carlo simulations of hysteresis loops of an individual core / shell nanoparticles , which , apart from the usual shift in the field axis direction , display asymmetry between the positive and negative field branches and also shifts in the vertical direction as observed in some experimental systems @xcite . by inspection of the spin configurations during field cycling
, we will show how this phenomenolgy is related to the peculiar interplay between exchange coupling at the core / shell interface and the magnetic order of its uncompensated spins induced after the field cooling process .
the details of model for the core / shell particle on which simulations are based were already presented in our previous studies @xcite , where the details about the simulation protocol used for the monte carlo method can also be found .
the simulations are based on the following hamiltonian : @xmath0 where @xmath1 are classical heisenberg spins of unit magnitude placed at the nodes of a sc lattice . in the first term , the value of the n.n .
exchange constants @xmath2 depends on the spins belonging to different particle regions . at the core , @xmath2 is fm and
has been fixed to @xmath3 k. af spins at the shell have @xmath4 .
the exchange coupling at the interface [ defined as those spinson the core ( shell ) with at least one neighbor on the shell(core ) ] is @xmath5 .
hysteresis loops obtained for a particle with total radius @xmath6a , surface shell thickness @xmath7a and @xmath8 , obtained after cooling from above the nel temperature of the af shell in a field @xmath9 are shown in fig .
[ fig_1 ] ( circles)for three values of @xmath5 . as can be clearly seen in the upper panels of the figure
, the loops display an increasing shift towards the negative field direction with increasing values of @xmath5 , demonstrating that the observance of eb is related to the af coupling of the shell spins the core spins at the interface . a detailed inspection of the microscopic configurations attained after the fc process @xcite revealed that , inspite of the af character of the coupling between the shell spins and also between the interfacial spins , a net magnetization component along the field direction is induced at the shell interface due to the geometrical symmetry breaking and the alignment of groups of spins into the field direction .
this net magnetic moment generates local fields on the core spins that point into the same direction as the external field , causing the shift of the hysteresis loops .
this is further supported by the observation that the hysteresis loops are shifted by the same amount but towards the positive field axis when obtained after cooling in a field applied in a direction negative with respect to the measuring field ( see for example the dashed lines in fig [ fig_1 ] . for @xmath10 ) .
( color online ) upper panels display the hysteresis loops for a particle with radius @xmath11 obtained after fc down to @xmath12 in a field @xmath9 ( circles ) and @xmath13 ( dashed lines ) for three values of the exchange coupling constant @xmath14 at the core / shell interface .
lower panels show the average magnetization projection of the core spins along the field axis @xmath15 ( squares ) and the hysteresis loops for the component of the magnetization transverse to the field direction @xmath16 ( circles ) . ] in addition , a clear asymmetry between the upper and lower loop branches developes with increasing values of the interface coupling .
this feature can be more clearly seen by looking at the average absolute value of the magnetization projection along the field axis through the reversal process , @xmath17 displayed in the lower panels of fig .
[ fig_1 ] for the core spins .
the origin of the loop asymmetry can be traced by monitoring the values the so - called overlap @xmath18 and link overlap @xmath19 functions along the hysteresis loops , that are a generalization of similar quantities commonly used in the spin - glass literature @xcite and that are defined as @xmath20 and @xmath21 , where in @xmath19 the summation is over nearest neighbors and @xmath22 is a normalization factor that counts the number of bonds .
an example of the field dependence of these overlaps computed only for the interfacial spins is shown in fig .
[ fig_2 ] , where we have separated the contribution of the shell and core spins . a departure of @xmath23 from unity
is known to be proportional to the surface of reversed domains formed at field @xmath24 and , therefore , @xmath23 is sensible to the existence of domain walls .
the sharp decrease of @xmath23 for core spins and the symmetry of the peak around the negative coercive field indicates uniform reversal .
however , the progressive reduction of @xmath23 along the ascending branch and the asymmetry of the peak around the positive coercive field indicates the formation of domain walls at the particle core that sweep the particle during reversal .
the function @xmath25 measures differences of the spin configuration at field @xmath24 with respect to the one attained after fc .
therefore , the decrease of @xmath26 for the interface shell spins when reducing the magnetic field indicates the existence of a fraction of shell spins that reverse dragged by core spins , while the constancy of @xmath26 in the ascending branch reveals the existence of spins pinned during core reversal .
clearly correlated to the observation of eb and the loop asymmetry , the loops experience a shift along the vertical ( @xmath29 ) axis which increases with @xmath14 , as reflected in fig .
[ fig_1 ] by the difference of the @xmath29 values in the high field region of the two loop branches or at the remanence points . the field dependence of magnetization transverse to the field direction @xmath16 ( circles in the lower panels of fig .
[ fig_1 ] ) , indicates that @xmath16 has higher values for the descending loop branch that in the ascending branch , and that @xmath16 increases with @xmath14 .
snapshots of the spin configurations at the remanence points shown in fig .
[ fig_3 ] , show the existence of a higher amount of core spins with transverse orientation near the interface at the lower branch ( fig .
[ fig_3]b , d ) than at the upper branch .
this is in agreementwith the results of some experiments of oxidized particles where this vertical shift was also observed @xcite .
our simulation results above , indicate that the microscopic origin of the vertical shift is the due to the different reversal mechanisms on the two loop branches due to the existence of uncompensated pinned moments at the core / shell interface that faciltate the nucleation of non - uniform magnetic structures during the ascending field branch of the loops . we acknowledge h. katzgraber for helpful comments on overlap functions and cesca and cepba under coordination of c@xmath30 for computer facilities . this work has been supported by the spanish meyc through the mat2003 - 01124 project and the generalitat de catalunya through the 2005sgr00969 cirit project .
h. ohldag _ et al .
87 ( 2001 ) 247201 ; h. ohldag _ et al .
91 ( 2003 ) 017203 ; p. kappenberger _
et al . _ , _ ibid . _ 91 ( 2003 ) 267202 ; p. blomqvist _
_ , _ ibid .
_ 94 ( 2005 ) 107203 ; s. roy _ et al .
_ , _ ibid .
_ 95 ( 2005 ) 047201 ; v. k. valev _
_ , _ ibid .
_ 96 ( 2006 ) 067206 ; e. arenholz
_ et al . _ ,
88 ( 2006 ) 072503
. r. k. zheng _
et al . _ ,
b 69 ( 2004 ) 214431 ; l. del bianco _ et al .
_ , _ ibid .
_ 70 ( 2004 ) 052401 ; j. b. tracy _
et al . _ , _ ibid . _ 72 ( 2005 ) 064404 ; e. passamani _ et al . _ , j. magn .
magn . mat .
299 ( 2006 ) 11 . | magnetic structures by ferromagnet fm with antiferromagnet afm show proximity effects enhanced nanoscale range @xcite studied is displacement of hysteresis loops along field axis in layered fm / afm systems core / shell nanoparticles after cooling in magnetic field termed exchange bias ( eb ) after by meiklejohn bean intensive research many open issues no model for observed phenomenology @xcite experiments spectrocopic focused on magnetization reversal at fm / afm interface in layered systems exchange bias related to uncompensated moments at interface in nanoparticles with fm core / afm shell structure details about interface accessed by techniques indirect information magnetic order inerface by magnetization measurements study results of monte carlo simulations of hysteresis loops of core / shell nanoparticles display asymmetry between positive and negative field branches shifts in vertical direction inspection of spin configurations during field cycling to interplay between exchange coupling at core / shell interface and magnetic order of uncompensated spins after field coolingdetails model core / shell particle simulations presented in previous studies @xcite simulation protocol monte carlo method simulations based on hamiltonian @xmath0 @xmath1 classical heisenberg spins at nodes sc lattice value n exchange constants @xmath2 depends on spins particle regions core @xmath2 is fm fixed to @xmath3 k af spins shell have @xmath4 exchange coupling at interface is @xmath5 hysteresis loops for particle with total radius @xmath6a surface shell thickness @xmath7a @xmath8 after cooling above nel temperature af shell field @xmath9 shown in fig . three values @xmath5 loops display increasing shift towards negative field direction with increasing values @xmath5 observance eb related to af coupling shell core spins interface detailed inspection microscopic configurations fc process @xcite revealed af character coupling shell interfacial spins net magnetization component field direction induced at shell interface due to geometrical symmetry breaking alignment spins magnetic moment generates local fields on core spins same direction causing shift hysteresis loopssupported by hysteresis loops shifted towards positive field axis after cooling in field negative dashed lines in fig @xmath10 upper panels display hysteresis loops for particle radius @xmath11 after fc to @xmath12 field @xmath9 @xmath13 for values exchange coupling constant @xmath14 at core / shell interface lower panels show average magnetization projection core spins along field axis @xmath15 hysteresis loops for magnetization transverse to field direction @xmath16 asymmetry between upper lower loop branches developes with increasing values interface coupling average value magnetization projection along field axis through reversal process @xmath17 lower panels fig for core spins origin loop asymmetry traced by monitoring overlap @xmath18 link overlap @xmath19 functions along hysteresis loops generalization of similar quantities spin - glass literature @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath19 summation nearest neighbors @xmath22 normalization factor number bonds example field dependence of overlaps for interfacial spins shown in fig_2 separated contribution shell and core spinsdeparture of @xmath23 from unity proportional to reversed domains at field @xmath24 sensible to domain walls decrease of @xmath23 for core spins symmetry peak around negative field indicates uniform reversal progressive reduction of @xmath23 along ascending branch asymmetry peak around positive field indicates domain walls at particle core during reversal function @xmath25 measures differences spin configuration at field @xmath24 after fc decrease of @xmath26 for interface shell spins when reducing magnetic field indicates fraction shell spins dragged by core spins constancy of @xmath26 in ascending branch reveals spins pinned during core reversal loops experience shift along vertical ( @xmath29 ) axis increases with @xmath14 difference @xmath29 values in high field region loop branches field dependence of magnetization transverse to field direction @xmath16 indicates higher values for descending loop branch increases with @xmath14 spin configurations at remanence points show higher amount core spins with transverse orientation near interface at lower branch than upperagreementwith results experiments oxidized particles vertical shift observed simulation results indicate microscopic origin vertical shift due different reversal mechanisms two loop branches uncompensated pinned moments core shell interface non - uniform magnetic structures ascending field branch acknowledge h. katzgraber comments overlap functions cesca cepba@xmath30 computer facilities work supported spanish meyc mat2003 - 01124 project generalitat catalunya 2005sgr00969 cirit project h. ohldag al 87 ( 2001 ) 247201 91 ( 2003 ) 017203 kappenberger 91 ( 2003 ) 267202 blomqvist 94 ( 2005 ) 107203 s. roy 95 ( 2005 ) 047201 v k. valev 96 ( 2006 ) 067206. arenholz 88 ( 2006 ) 072503 k. zheng 69 ( 2004 ) 214431 l. del bianco 70 ( 2004 ) 052401 j b. tracy 72 ( 2005 ) 064404 e. passamani magn mat . 299 ( 2006 ) 11 . | 0.320462 | 2,117 | 1,077 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,816 | transonic accretion flow with self - consistent treatment of the magnetic field is presented .
my website http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~rshcherb/. address = harvard university , astronomy department , 60 , garden st , cambridge , usa | the averaged quantities can be obtained in two different ways in magnetohydrodynamics .
the first way is to solve 3d mhd equations and then average the results .
the second way is to solve some system of equations on averages .
combination of numerical simulations and averaged theory brings phenomenology that can describe observations or experimental data .
the problem of spherically symmetric accretion takes its origin from bondi s work @xcite .
he presented idealized hydrodynamic solution with accretion rate @xmath0 however , magnetic field @xmath1 always exists in the real systems .
even small seed @xmath1 amplifies in spherical infall and becomes dynamically important @xcite .
magnetic field inhibits accretion @xcite .
none of many theories has reasonably calculated the magnetic field evolution and how it influences dynamics .
these theories have some common pitfalls .
first of all , the direction of magnetic field is usually defined .
secondly , the magnetic field strength is prescribed by thermal equipartition assumption . in third , dynamical effect of magnetic field
is calculated with conventional magnetic energy and pressure .
all these inaccuracies can be eliminated . in section 2[section_method ] i develop a model that abandons equipartition prescription , calculates the magnetic field direction and strength and employs the correct equations of magnetized fluid dynamics . in section 3[results ] i show this accretion pattern to be in qualitative agreement with sgr a * spectrum models .
i discuss my assumptions in section 4 [ discussion ] .
reasonable turbulence evolution model is the key difference of my method .
i build an averaged turbulence theory that corresponds to numerical simulations .
i start with the model of isotropic turbulence that is consistent with simulations of collisional mhd in three regimes .
those regimes are decaying hydrodynamic turbulence , decaying mhd turbulence and dynamo action .
i introduce effective isotropization of magnetic field in 3d model .
isotropization is taken to have a timescale of the order of dissipation timescale that is a fraction @xmath2 of the alfven wave crossing time @xmath3 common misconception exists about the dynamical influence of magnetic field .
neither magnetic energy nor magnetic pressure can represent @xmath1 in dynamics .
correct averaged euler and energy equations were derived in @xcite for radial magnetic field .
magnetic force @xmath4 $ ] can be averaged over the solid angle with proper combination of @xmath5 i extend the derivation to random magnetic field without preferred direction .
dynamical effect of magnetic helicity @xcite is also investigated .
i neglect radiative and mechanical transport processes .
the derived set of equations requires some modifications and boundary conditions to be applicable to the real astrophysical systems .
i add external energy input to turbulence to balance dissipative processes in the outer flow .
the outer turbulence is taken to be isotropic and has magnetization @xmath6 transonic smooth solution is chosen as possessing the highest accretion rate as in @xcite .
[ fig1 ] , title="fig : " ]
[ fig2 ] with radius.,title="fig : " ] the results of my calculations confirm some known facts about spherical magnetized accretion , agree with the results of numerical simulations and have some previously unidentified features .
initially isotropic magnetic field exhibits strong anisotropy with larger radial field @xmath7 perpendicular magnetic field @xmath8 is dynamically unimportant in the inner accretion region fig[fig1 ] . because magnetic field dissipates , infall onto the black hole can proceed @xcite .
turbulence is supported by external driving in the outer flow regions , but internal driving due to freezing - in amplification takes over in the inner flow fig[fig2 ] .
magnetization of the flow increases in the inner region with decreasing radius consistently with simulations @xcite .
density profile appears to be @xmath9 that is different from traditional adaf scaling @xmath10 @xcite .
thus the idea of self - similar behavior is not supported .
compared to non - magnetized accretion , infall rate is 2 - 5 times smaller depending on outer magnetization . in turn ,
gas density is 2 - 5 times smaller in the region close to the black hole , where synchrotron radiation emerges @xcite .
sgr a * produces relatively weak synchrotron @xcite .
so , either gas density @xmath11 or electron temperature @xmath12 or magnetic field @xmath13 are small in the inner flow or combination of factors works .
thus low gas density in magnetized model is in qualitative agreement with the results of modelling the spectrum .
flow is convectively stable on average in the model of moving blobs , where dissipation heat is released homogeneously in volume .
moving blobs are in radial and perpendicular pressure equilibriums .
they are governed by the same equations as the medium .
the presented accretion study self - consistently treats turbulence in the averaged model .
this model introduces many weak assumptions instead of few strong ones .
i take dissipation rate to be that of collisional mhd simulations .
but flow in question is rather in collisionless regime .
observations of collisionless flares in solar corona @xcite gives dissipation rate @xmath14 times smaller than in collisional simulations @xcite .
however , flares in solar corona may represent a large - scale reconnection event rather than developed turbulence .
it is unclear which dissipation rate is more realistic for accretion .
magnetic field presents another caveat .
magnetic field lines should close , or @xmath15 should hold .
radial field is much larger than perpendicular in the inner region .
therefore , characteristic radial scale of the flow is much larger than perpendicular .
if radial turbulence scale is larger than radius , freezing - in condition does not hold anymore .
matter can freely slip along radial field lines into the black hole .
if matter slips already at the sonic point , the accretion rate should be higher than calculated .
some other assumptions are more likely to be valid .
diffusion should be weak because of high mach number that approaches unity at large radius .
magnetic helicity was found to play very small dynamical role .
only when the initial turbulence is highly helical , magnetic helicity conservation may lead to smaller accretion rate .
neglect of radiative cooling is justified a posteriori .
line cooling time is about @xmath14 times larger that inflow time from outer boundary .
9 d. biskamp , _ magnetohydrodynamic turbulence _ , cambridge university press , oxford , 2003 h. bondi , _ mon . not .
soc . _ * 112 * , 195 ( 1952 ) .
i. igumenshchev , _ astrophys .
j. _ * 649 * , 361 ( 2006 ) l. d. landau , e. m. lifshitz , l. p. pitaevskii , _ electrodynamics of continuous media _ , pergamon press , oxford , 1984 j. b. noglik , r. w. walsh , j. ireland , _ astron . &
_ * 441 * , 353 ( 2005 ) r. narayan , i. yi , r. mahadevan , _ nature _ * 374 * , 623 ( 1995 ) e. t. scharlemann , _ astrophys . j. _ * 272 * , 279 ( 1983 ) a. a. schekochihin et al . _
j. _ * 276 * , 612 ( 2004 ) v. f. schwartzman , _
soviet astronomer _ * 15 * , 377 ( 1971 ) k. r. sreenivasan , _ phys . of fluids
_ * 7 * , 2778 ( 1995 ) | averaged quantities obtained magnetohydrodynamics first solve 3d mhd equations average results second solve system equations averages numerical simulations averaged theory phenomenology data problem of spherically symmetric accretion from bondi s work @xcite presented hydrodynamic solution accretion rate magnetic field @xmath1 exists in real systems small seed amplifies dynamically important magnetic field inhibits accretion theories calculated magnetic field evolution dynamics theories pitfalls direction magnetic field defined strength prescribed by thermal equipartition assumption dynamical effect calculated with conventional magnetic energy pressure inaccuracies eliminated section 2 model abandons equipartition prescription calculates magnetic field direction strength employs correct equations magnetized fluid dynamics section 3 accretion pattern with sgr a spectrum models discuss assumptions in section 4 reasonable turbulence evolution model key difference method averaged turbulence theory numerical simulations start model of isotropic turbulence consistent with simulations collisional mhd three regimes introduce effective isotropization of magnetic field in 3d modelisotropization timescale dissipation fraction of alfven wave crossing time misconception about dynamical influence magnetic field neither magnetic energy pressure represent @xmath1 in dynamics correct averaged euler energy equations derived for radial magnetic field magnetic force averaged over solid angle with combination extend derivation to random magnetic field without direction dynamical effect of magnetic helicity investigated neglect radiative mechanical transport processes derived equations requires modifications boundary conditions astrophysical systems add external energy input to turbulence balance dissipative processes outer flow outer turbulence isotropic has magnetization transonic smooth solution highest accretion rate calculations confirm spherical magnetized accretion agree with numerical simulations unidentified features isotropic magnetic field strong anisotropy with larger radial field perpendicular magnetic field dynamically unimportant in inner accretion region magnetic field dissipates infall black hole turbulence supported by external driving outer flow regions internal driving takes over inner flow magnetization increases inner region with decreasing radius density profile different from traditional adaf scalingself - similar behavior not supported non - magnetized accretion infall rate 2 - 5 times smaller outer magnetization gas density 2 - 5 times smaller close to black hole synchrotron radiation emerges produces weak synchrotron gas density electron temperature magnetic field small in inner flow low gas density in magnetized model with results modelling spectrum flow convectively stable in model of moving blobs dissipation heat released radial perpendicular pressure equilibriums governed by same equations as medium accretion study treats turbulence in averaged model introduces weak assumptions strong dissipation rate collisional simulations flow collisionless regime collisionless flares in solar corona dissipation rate times smaller than collisional simulations flares may represent large - scale reconnection event turbulence unclear which dissipation rate realistic for accretion magnetic field caveat lines radial field larger than perpendicular in inner region characteristic radial scale flow larger if radial turbulence larger than freezing - in condition hold matter can slip into black hole if at point accretion rate higher thanassumptions likely valid diffusion weak high mach number unity magnetic helicity small dynamical role initial turbulence helical magnetic helicity conservation smaller accretion neglect radiative cooling justified posteriori line cooling time times larger inflow time outer boundary. biskamp magnetohydrodynamic turbulence cambridge university press oxford 2003 bondi 112 *, 195 ( 1952 ) igumenshchev astrophys. 649 *, 361 ( 2006 ) landau lifshitz pitaevskii electrodynamics continuous media pergamon press oxford 1984 noglik walsh ireland 441 * , 353 ( 2005 ) narayan mahadevan nature 374, 623 ( 1995 ) scharlemann astrophys. 272, 279 ( 1983 ) schekochihin 276 *, 612 ( 2004 ) schwartzman soviet astronomer 15 , 377 ( 1971 ) sreenivasan phys fluids 7, 2778 ( 1995 ) | 0.267378 | 1,699 | 804 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,834 | a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 232pb@xmath0 was collected in 1997 and 1998 by the l3 experiment at lep in @xmath1 collisions at centre of mass energies between @xmath2 and @xmath3 .
pair production of fermions and bosons is studied and compared with the standard model expectations .
events with a single detected photon or w boson are also considered .
the measurement of several standard model cross sections is discussed .
the presence and the magnitude of triple couplings of charged and neutral electroweak gauge bosons is investigated .
these processes are used to probe new physics beyond the standard model , including the existence of extra spatial dimensions .
-2.0 cm -3.0 cm * recent results from the l3 experiment * + salvatore mele + ep division , cern , ch1211 , genve 23 , switzerland + _ on behalf of the l3 collaboration _ | the l3 detector @xcite started in 1989 to collect data at lep in @xmath1 collisions at a centre of mass energy @xmath4 .
it has contributed to the success of the lepi programme , when more than twenty millions of z bosons were produced testing the standard model of electroweak interactions @xcite ( sm ) with an impressive precision @xcite . in
1995 the campaign for the gradual increase of the lep beam energy started , bringing the experiments in the so called lepii era . in the present paper
i will give a snapshot of several l3 results from the high integrated luminosity runs of 1997 and 1998 at an average @xmath5 of @xmath6 and @xmath3 , respectively .
these two energies will be indicated as @xmath7 and @xmath8 hereafter and correspond to 55pb@xmath0 and 176pb@xmath0 of integrated luminosity , respectively .
some of the results described here are published , others are preliminary . results from the lower energy runs at @xmath9 with 10pb@xmath0 of integrated luminosity and @xmath10 with 21pb@xmath0 , are sometimes included in the discussed analyses .
these results , which are only a subsample of the lepii physics program carried out by the l3 experiment , are classified in the following according to the type and number of particles primarily produced in the @xmath11 interactions : two fermions , two w , just one w , two or more photons , one z and a photon and two z. tests of theories of gravity with extra spatial dimensions are finally presented .
fermion pair production is a fundamental process to be studied at lepii both as a verification of sm predictions and as a necessary check of the understanding of the detector performance .
a kinematically favoured configuration in fermion pair production at energies above the z pole is the emission of an hard initial state photon which lowers the effective centre of mass energy , @xmath12 , to the z resonance .
this process is known as `` radiative return to the z '' and yields high energy photons either in the detector or almost collinear with the beams and hence undetected .
it is customary to express the results of the cross sections and forward backward asymmetries of the fermions by separating the full data sample ( @xmath13 ) and the purely high energy one , from which the radiative return to the z events are rejected ( @xmath14 ) .
table 1 reports the l3 results for the two considered energies @xcite for quark , muon , tau and electron pairs . a good agreement with the sm predictions is observed .
figure [ fig:1 ] presents the evolution with @xmath5 of the fermion pair cross section as predicted by the sm and measured by the l3 experiment . from the analysis of events with a single photon visible in the detector
@xcite it is possible to derive the radiative neutrino pair production cross section . at @xmath8
the measured cross section is : @xmath15 where the first error is statistical and the second systematic .
the extrapolation of this value to the total cross section reads : @xmath16 + channel & @xmath13 & @xmath14 & @xmath13 & @xmath14 + @xmath17 & @xmath18&@xmath19 & & + @xmath20 & @xmath21&@xmath22 & @xmath23&@xmath24 + @xmath25 & @xmath26&@xmath27 & @xmath28&@xmath29 + @xmath30 & @xmath31&@xmath32 & @xmath33&@xmath34 + + @xmath17 & @xmath35&@xmath36 & &
+ @xmath20 & @xmath37&@xmath38 & @xmath39&@xmath40 + @xmath25 & @xmath41&@xmath42 & @xmath43&@xmath44 + @xmath30 & @xmath45&@xmath46 & @xmath47&@xmath48 + figure [ fig:1 ] shows the evolution of these two cross sections as a function of @xmath5 as well as a comparison of @xmath49 with the sm expectations in presence of 2 , 3 or 4 neutrino species . from the photon energy spectrum it is possible to determine the number @xmath50 of light neutrino species as @xmath51 , with respectively statistic and systematic errors
the average of this result with l3 results at the z pole @xcite yields : @xmath52 the study of fermion pairs constitutes also an interesting probe of possible new physics beyond the sm .
the examples of supersymmetry and contact interactions will be highlighted in the following .
the minimal supersymmetric standard model @xcite ( mssm ) introduces a new quantum number , the r parity @xcite .
this quantity distinguishes ordinary particles and supersymmetric ones , requiring an even number of the latter in each interaction vertex and hence constraining the lightest supersymmetric particle to be stable . as a consequence of the negative results of the search for supersymmetric particles at the present colliders ,
it is interesting to investigate possible signatures of supersymmetric models with broken r
parity @xcite , where triple vertices with a supersymmetric particle and two sm ones are allowed .
some of these signatures are the production of a pair of electrons in @xmath1 collisions mediated by the @xmath53 or @xmath54channel muon or tau sneutrino exchange , the production of a muon pair via the @xmath53channel exchange of a tau sneutrino or that of a tau pair via a muon sneutrino .
these sneutrinos are the scalar partner of the sm neutrinos .
the presence of these processes would lead to a resonant structure in the lepton pair production cross section around the mass of the exchanged sneutrino . from the investigation @xcite of the cross sections and asymmetries of final states electrons , muons and tau ,
no evidence for such signatures is found and limits at 95% confidence level ( cl ) are derived on the coupling constant of the sneutrino as a function of its mass , as reported in figure [ fig : snu ] , for the electron and muon signatures .
contact interactions can be thought of as a general formalism to describe new physics from a scale much higher than the energy of an investigated process .
an example is the contact interaction structure used by fermi to describe the beta decay @xcite fifty years before colliders reached the necessary energy to produce the w boson , whose mass is now known to be the scale of the process .
analogously a new interaction of coupling constant @xmath55 and scale @xmath56 yet far above direct experimental reach can be probed in fermion pair production in @xmath1 interactions .
it is sketched in figure [ fig : ci ] and is parametrised via an effective lagrangian @xcite : @xmath57 where @xmath58 and @xmath59 are the left and right handed initial state electron and final state fermion fields and the coefficients @xmath60 allow to choose which helicities contribute to the fermion pair production within the different models , as listed in table 2 .
the contact interaction will manifest itself in the differential cross sections of a given phase space parameter as a function of @xmath61 in the interference terms of sm and new physics and as a function of @xmath62 for the pure new physics part .
the search for contact interactions @xcite proceeds by performing a @xmath63 fit to the charged fermion pair cross sections and asymmetries measurements presented above , with @xmath56 as a free parameter with the convention @xmath64 .
the results of those fits are compatible with the sm for all the possible choices of the helicities and 95% cl limits as high as @xmath65 are set on the scale @xmath56 of some models .
all the limits are presented in figure [ fig : ci ] , where @xmath66 and @xmath67 denote respectively the limits in the case of the upper and lower signs of the @xmath68 parameters of table 2 .
lower energy data @xcite are also included .
.helicities contributions in different models of contact interactions . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] from the analysis @xcite of the presented distributions as well as hadronic w pair events and @xmath69 pairs , together with the discriminating variables of the zz event selections and the hadronic cross section , no statistically significant hints for lsg are found in the l3 data at @xmath7 and @xmath8 and the 95% cl limits presented in table 4 are set on @xmath70 . assuming that no higher order operators give sizeable contributions to the lsg mediated boson and fermion pair production and that the meaning of the cutoff parameter is the same for all the investigated processes , it is possible to combine the boson and fermion limits .
they are as high as @xmath71 for @xmath72 and @xmath73 for @xmath74 at 95% cl and are competitive with those achieved from a combined analysis of the lepii data @xcite
. the l3 collaboration also investigated the direct production of a graviton , lost in the extra dimensions , associated with a photon @xcite or a z @xcite .
the phase space favours the first process .
these searches did not not yield any evidence for the expected lsg signatures @xcite allowing to set 95% cl limits on the lsg scale in excess of @xmath75 .
this walk through part of the recent l3 results shows a quite wide activity , even on subjects that were not expected to be covered at the start of the lepii experimental program @xcite . on this point
all the experiments match the efforts of the accelerator crew that is impressing the community with record breaking performance in term of energy , luminosity and operation efficiency .
several important results have been omitted from this review due to the lack of space and the framework of the discussion .
the most important worth mentioning are the 95% cl mass limits on the sm higgs boson at @xmath76 @xcite and that on the lightest mssm neutralino at @xmath77 @xcite , both achieved with the analysis of the full data sample collected by l3 up to @xmath8 .
moreover the l3 experiment has contributed with a large amount of results to the field of two photon physics , as reviewed in reference @xcite .
let me close this review with the hope that something more than precise cross section measurements and interesting limits is awaiting the lep community in the secrets of the last gev still to be squeezed from the machine in the high energy runs of 1999 up to a centre of mass energy of @xmath78 , and even beyond , in the final run of the year 2000 .
i am grateful to my colleagues of the l3 experiment , too numerous to be named here , with whom i shared this challenging physics adventure since i arrived at cern as an undergraduate student , through the end of the century .
it is only with the lively daily interaction with many of them on several of the subjects i described in this work , that i learned something about experimental high energy physics .
i wish to thank the organisers of this conference in particular for having helped me to find a swimming pool on the leninskii prospekt and to fix some complex part of my travel arrangements , two tasks at more than 95% cl beyond the reach of my russian phrase book .
99 l3 collab . , b. adeva , nucl .
. meth . * a 289 * ( 1990 ) 35 ; l3 collab . , o. adriani , physics reports * 236 * ( 1993 ) 1 ; m. chemarin , nucl . inst . meth . * a 349 * ( 1994 ) 345 ; m. acciarri , nucl . inst
. meth . * a 351 * ( 1994 ) 300 ; i. c. brock , nucl . instr . and meth . * a 381 * ( 1996 ) 236 ; a. adam , nucl . inst
. meth . * a 383 * ( 1996 ) 342 ; g. basti , nucl .
. meth . * a 374 * ( 1996 ) 293 ; | l3 detector @xcite started 1989 data lep @xmath1 collisions centre mass energy @xmath4 contributed success lepi programme twenty millions z bosons produced testing electroweak interactions precision 1995 campaign increase lep beam energy started lepii era present paper snapshot l3 results high integrated luminosity runs 1997 1998 average @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath3 energies indicated as @xmath7 and @xmath8 correspond to 55pb@xmath0 176pb@xmath0 integrated luminosity some results published others preliminary results lower energy runs @xmath9 10pb@xmath0 luminosity @xmath10 21pb@xmath0 included analyses results subsample lepii physics program experiment classified type number particles produced @xmath11 interactions two fermions two w one w two more photons one z tests theories gravity with extra spatial dimensions presented fermion pair production fundamental lepii verification sm predictions check detector performance favoured configuration fermion pair production energies above z pole emission hard initial state photon lowers centre mass energy @xmath12 to z resonanceprocess known radiative return to z yields high energy photons in detector or collinear undetected customary express results asymmetries full data sample @xmath13 high energy events rejected @xmath14 table 1 reports l3 results for @xcite quark muon tau electron pairs agreement with sm predictions observed figure presents evolution with @xmath5 fermion pair cross section predicted by sm measured by l3 experiment analysis events single photon detector derive radiative neutrino pair production cross section at @xmath8 measured cross section is @xmath15 first error statistical second systematicextrapolation value to total cross section reads @xmath16 + channel @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath20 @xmath25 @xmath30 @xmath17@xmath36 @xmath20 @xmath39@xmath40 @xmath25 @xmath41@xmath42@xmath44 @xmath30 @xmath45@xmath46 @xmath47@xmath48 figure shows evolution of cross sections function @xmath5 comparison of @xmath49 with sm expectations 2 3 4 neutrino species from photon energy spectrum determine number of light neutrino species as @xmath51 with statistic systematic errors average result with l3 results at z pole yields : @xmath52 study of fermion pairs probe new physics beyond sm examples supersymmetry contact interactions highlighted minimal supersymmetric standard model @xcite introduces new quantum number r parity @xcite distinguishes ordinary particles and supersymmetric requiring even number in each interaction vertex lightest supersymmetric particle stablenegative results supersymmetric particles at colliders investigate signatures supersymmetric models with broken r parity @xcite triple vertices with supersymmetric particle two sm ones allowed signatures are production electrons in @xmath1 collisions @xmath53 or @xmath54channel muon tau sneutrino exchange production muon pair via @xmath53channel tau sneutrino tau pair muon sneutrino sneutrinos scalar partner sm neutrinos resonant structure in lepton pair production cross section around mass exchanged sneutrino investigation electrons muons tau no evidence for signatures limits at 95% confidence level on coupling constant sneutrino mass figure for electron muon signatures contact interactions new physics from scale higher than energy process example contact interaction structure fermi beta decay @xcite fifty years before colliders w boson mass scale process new interaction of coupling constant @xmath55 and scale @xmath56 above experimental reach probed in fermion pair production in @xmath1 interactionssketched in figure parametrised via lagrangian @xcite : @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 left right initial state electron final state fermion fields coefficients @xmath60 choose helicities fermion pair production models table 2 contact interaction in differential cross sections phase space parameter function @xmath61 interference sm new physics @xmath62 physics search for contact interactions @xmath63 fit to charged fermion pair cross sections asymmetries @xmath56 free parameter convention @xmath64 results compatible with sm for choices helicities 95% cl limits @xmath65 set on scale @xmath56 models limits presented in figure fig ci @xmath66 @xmath67 denote limits upper lower signs @xmath68 parameters table 2 lower energy data @xcite included.helicities contributions in models contact interactions analysis distributions events @xmath69 pairs zz event selections hadronic cross section no statistically significant hints for lsg in l3 data at @xmath7 @xmath8 95% cl limits table 4 set on @xmath70no higher order operators to lsg boson fermion pair production cutoff parameter same for all processes possible to combine boson fermion limits high as @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 at 95% cl competitive with analysis lepii data @xcite l3 collaboration investigated direct production graviton lost in dimensions associated with photon @xcite z phase space favours first process yield evidence for expected lsg signatures @xcite 95% cl limits on lsg scale excess of @xmath75 l3 results shows wide activity on subjects not expected lepii experimental program @xcite experiments match efforts accelerator crew record breaking performance energy luminosity operation efficiency important results omitted to lack of space framework 95% cl mass limits on sm higgs boson at @xmath76 lightest mssm neutralino at @xmath77 achieved with analysis full data sample l3 up to @xmath8 l3 experiment contributed to two photon physics reviewed @xcite hope more than precise cross section measurements interesting limits awaiting lep community in secrets of last gev high energy runs 1999 to centre of mass energy @xmath78 beyond final run 2000grateful to colleagues l3 experiment shared physics adventure since cern undergraduate student daily interaction learned experimental high energy physics thank organisers conference swimming pool leninskii prospekt travel arrangements russian l3 collab . b. adeva nucl . meth . 289 1990 ) 35 ; l3 o. adriani reports 236 * 1993 ) 1 ; m. chemarin nucl . inst . meth . 349 1994 ) 345 ; m. acciarri nucl . inst meth . 351 ( 1994 ) 300 ; c. brock nucl . instr . meth . 381 1996 ) 236 ; a. adam nucl . inst . meth . 383 1996 ) 342 ; g. basti , nucl . meth . 374 1996 ) 293 | 0.432606 | 2,749 | 1,401 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,840 | i derive the hawking flux from black holes of constant negative curvature and from a black hole of constant negative curvature conformally coupled to a scalar field , using the covariant gravitational anomalies method . | a few years ago wilczek and collaborators proposed a new method to derive the hawking flux from spherical black holes@xcite .
they have proved , using a dimensional reduction procedure , that near the event horizon effective field theories become two - dimensional and exhibit gauge and gravitational anomalies .
they showed , in the unruh vacuum , that the hawking flux emerges in order to cancel these anomalies .
recent applications and a modification of this method can be found in refs . . a more technically simplified version of the method for asymptotically flat spacetimes , using only the covariant form of the anomalies ,
was suggested in ref . .
the purpose of this brief article , which is based in ref . , is to apply this method of covariant anomalies in asymptotically non - flat spacetimes of non - spherical topology .
consider the four - dimensional black hole solutions of einstein s equations with negative cosmological constant @xmath0 .
these asymptotically locally anti - de sitter ( ads ) black holes are known as topological black holes ( tbhs)@xcite and their metric is @xmath1 where @xmath2 is the ads radius and @xmath3 is a constant proportional to the black hole mass .
their topology is @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is a two - dimensional manifold of constant negative curvature .
the angular part of , with @xmath6 and @xmath7 , is the line element of the manifold @xmath5 , which is locally isomorphic to the hyperbolic manifold @xmath8 and of the form @xmath9 , where @xmath10 is a discrete subgroup of isometries of @xmath11 .
the manifold @xmath5 is a compact two - dimensional surface of constant negative curvature and of genus @xmath12@xcite .
below , i will concentrate only on the genus @xmath13 case and deal with the event horizon @xmath14 , which corresponds to the outer horizon for @xmath15 and to the unique horizon for @xmath16 .
now consider a complex scalar field @xmath17 in the background of the tbh of genus two .
its action is @xmath18 where the first term is the free part of the action and @xmath19 is the part which includes a mass term , potential terms and self - interaction terms .
i perform a partial wave decomposition of @xmath20 in terms of the functions @xmath21 , which are defined as @xmath22 where @xmath23 are the associated legendre functions , @xmath24 and @xmath25 takes discrete real values @xmath26 . these functions
form a complete orthonormalized set of functions on the manifold @xmath5 of genus two@xcite . upon transforming to the `` tortoise ''
coordinate @xmath27 defined by @xmath28 and taking the near - horizon limit @xmath29 , one finds that the effective radial potentials for partial wave modes of the field , the mass term and the interaction terms contain the suppression factor @xmath30 and vanish exponentially fast@xcite . keeping only dominant terms ,
i find that physics near the event horizon can be effectively described by an infinite collection of two - dimensional free massless scalar fields , each propagating in a two - dimensional spacetime , which is given by the @xmath31 part of the tbh metric of @xcite . in this reduced two - dimensional spacetime , following the ideas of wilczek et al.@xcite , i neglect the ingoing modes in the region near the event horizon , which behave as left - moving modes , since they can not classically affect physics outside the horizon .
then , the effective two - dimensional theory exhibits a gravitational anomaly in this region , in the form of the non - conservation of the energy - momentum tensor@xcite .
the time component of the covariant gravitational anomaly is@xcite @xmath32 @xmath33 is the covariant energy - momentum tensor and the prime denotes differentiation with respect to @xmath34 . solving this equation with the proposed in refs .
boundary condition @xmath35 , i find the non - conserved energy - momentum tensor @xmath36 the hawking flux is measured at infinity , where there is no gravitational anomaly and in refs .
it was given by the conserved energy - momentum tensor .
one sees that the gravitational anomaly @xmath37 vanishes at asymptotic infinity .
however , @xmath38 is non - zero there , due to the fact that the spacetime asymptotically is ads .
these remarks and , which can be written as @xmath39 , imply that the conserved energy - momentum tensor , or the energy flux @xmath40 measured at infinity , is @xmath41 the energy flux @xmath40 has a form equivalent to blackbody radiation of temperature @xmath42@xcite , which is exactly the hawking temperature of the tbh of @xcite .
hence , @xmath40 can be identified with the hawking flux from this tbh .
however , i should note that the actual hawking radiation observed at infinity is calculated through the grey - body factors , due to the curvature of the spacetime away from the horizon@xcite .
another interesting non - spherical black hole solution is a tbh conformally coupled to a scalar field @xmath43 .
this black hole solution is known as the mtz black hole@xcite @xmath44 where @xmath45 is newton s constant and @xmath46 is a constant proportional to the black hole mass .
the mtz black hole has the same topology as the tbhs previously analyzed .
therefore , i will concentrate again only on the case of @xmath5 being a genus two compact surface of constant negative curvature and deal with the event horizon @xmath47 , which is the unique horizon for @xmath48 and the outer horizon for @xmath49 . considering a complex scalar field @xmath20 in the background of the mtz black hole of genus two , which does not interact with the scalar field @xmath43 , the dimensional reduction procedure proceeds as in
. all the arguments of hold also in this case@xcite and the conserved energy - momentum tensor is @xmath50 this energy flux has a form equivalent to blackbody radiation of temperature @xmath51@xcite , which is the hawking temperature of the mtz black hole .
the conformally coupled scalar field @xmath43 , which is time - independent , does not contribute to the hawking flux .
this was proved explicitly in ref . by showing that its action near the horizon vanishes , due to the presence of the suppression factor @xmath30 .
conclusively , i derived the hawking temperature and flux , without backscattering effects , from non - spherical black holes in asymptotically non - flat spacetimes , via the method of covariant anomalies , and showed that an infinite set of two - dimensional scalar fields near the horizon acts as the thermal source of this flux .
robinson and f. wilczek , _ phys .
lett . _ * 95 * , 011303 ( 2005 ) .
s. iso , h. umetsu and f. wilczek , _ phys .
lett . _ * 96 * , 151302 ( 2006 ) .
s. iso , h. umetsu and f. wilczek , _ phys .
d _ * 74 * , 044017 ( 2006 ) .
l. bonora , m. cvitan , s. pallua and i. smolic , _ phys .
d _ * 80 * , 084034 ( 2009 ) ; j. j. peng and s. q. wu , arxiv:0906.5121 [ hep - th ] ; s. w. wei , r. li , y. x. liu and j. r. ren , _ eur .
phys . j. c _ * 65 * , 281 ( 2010 ) ; r. becar , p. gonzalez , g. pulgar and j. saavedra , arxiv:0808.1735 [ gr - qc ] .
t. morita , _ phys .
b _ * 677 * , 88 ( 2009 ) . r. banerjee , _ int
* 17 * , 2539 ( 2009 ) .
e. papantonopoulos and p. skamagoulis , _ phys .
d _ * 79 * , 084022 ( 2009 ) .
l. vanzo , _ phys .
d _ * 56 * , 6475 ( 1997 ) .
e. n. argyres , c. g. papadopoulos , e. papantonopoulos and k. tamvakis , _ j. phys .
a _ * 22 * , 3577 ( 1989 ) . c. martinez , r. troncoso and j. zanelli , _ phys
d _ * 70 * , 084035 ( 2004 ) . | ago wilczek collaborators proposed method hawking flux from spherical black holes@xcite proved near event horizon field theories two - dimensional exhibit gravitational anomalies showed hawking flux emerges anomalies recent applications modification in refs simplified version flat spacetimes covariant form anomalies suggested ref. purpose article apply method covariant anomalies in non - flat spacetimes non - spherical topology consider four - dimensional black hole solutions einstein s equations negative cosmological constant @xmath0 asymptotically anti - de black holes topological black holes tbhs)@xcite metric @xmath1 radius constant proportional black hole mass topology @xmath4 @xmath5 two - dimensional manifold constant negative curvature angular part line element manifold @xmath5 isomorphic to hyperbolic manifold @xmath8 form @xmath9 @xmath10 subgroup isometries @xmath11 manifold @xmath5 compact two - dimensional surface constant negative curvature genus @xmath12@xciteconcentrate genus @xmath13 case event horizon @xmath14 corresponds outer horizon @xmath15 unique horizon @xmath16 consider complex scalar field @xmath17 tbh genus two action @xmath18 first term free part @xmath19 mass term potential self - interaction terms partial wave decomposition @xmath20 functions @xmath21 defined @xmath22 @xmath23 associated legendre functions @xmath24 @xmath25 real values @xmath26 functions form complete orthonormalized set functions manifold @xmath5 genus two transforming tortoise coordinate @xmath27 @xmath28 near - horizon limit @xmath29 effective radial potentials partial wave modes mass term interaction terms contain suppression factor @xmath30 vanish fast dominant terms physics near event horizon described infinite collection two - dimensional free massless scalar fields propagating two - dimensional spacetime @xmath31 part tbh metric @xcite neglect ingoing modes near event horizon left - moving modes not affect physics outside horizon two - dimensional theory exhibits gravitational anomaly non - conservation energy - momentum tensortime component covariant gravitational anomaly@xcite @xmath32 @xmath33 covariant energy - momentum tensor prime differentiation @xmath34 solving equation boundary condition @xmath35 non - conserved energy - momentum tensor @xmath36 hawking flux measured at infinity no gravitational anomaly conserved energy - momentum tensor gravitational anomaly @xmath37 vanishes infinity @xmath38 non - zero spacetime @xmath39 conserved energy - momentum tensor energy flux @xmath40 infinity @xmath41 energy flux form equivalent blackbody radiation temperature @xmath42@xcite hawking temperature tbh @xcite @xmath40 identified hawking flux actual hawking radiation at infinity calculated grey - body factors curvature spacetime horizon@xcite non - spherical black hole solution tbh coupled scalar field @xmath43 mtz black hole@xcite @xmath44 @xmath45 newton s constant @xmath46 constant proportional black hole mass black same topology as tbhs analyzedconcentrate on @xmath5 genus two compact surface constant negative curvature event horizon @xmath47 unique horizon @xmath48 outer horizon @xmath49 complex scalar field @xmath20 mtz black hole genus two interact with scalar field @xmath43 dimensional reduction procedure proceeds arguments hold@xcite conserved energy - momentum tensor @xmath50 energy flux form equivalent blackbody radiation temperature @xmath51@xcite hawking temperature mtz black hole coupled scalar field @xmath43 time - independent contribute hawking flux action near horizon vanishes due suppression factor @xmath30 derived hawking temperature flux from non - spherical black holes non - flat spacetimes covariant anomalies infinite set two - dimensional scalar fields near horizon thermal source flux robinson f. wilczek phys . 95 *, 011303 ( 2005 ) iso h umetsu f. wilczek 96 151302 ( 2006 ) 74 * 044017 ( 2006 ) l. bonora m. cvitan s. pallua. smolic phys 80 * 084034 ( 2009 ) peng q.wu arxiv:0906.5121 hep - th wei li liu ren phys 65 * 281 ( 2010 ) becar gonzalez pulgar saavedra arxiv:0808.1735 gr - qc t morita phys 677 * 88 ( 2009 ) banerjee 17 2539 ( 2009 ) papantonopoulos p skamagoulis d 79 084022 ( 2009 ) vanzo d 56 * 6475 ( 1997 ). argyres papadopoulos papantonopoulos k tamvakis phys 22 * 3577 ( 1989 ) martinez. troncoso j. zanelli phys d 70 * 084035 ( 2004 ) | 0.313296 | 1,981 | 1,016 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,842 | the effect of an external magnetic field in qcd phase diagram , namely , in the the location of the critical end point ( cep ) is investigated . using the 2 + 1 flavor nambu-jona - lasinio model with polyakov loop
, it is shown that when an external magnetic field is applied its effect on the cep depends on the strength of the coupling .
if the coupling depends on the magnetic field , allowing for inverse magnetic catalysis , the cep moves to lower chemical potentials eventually disappearing , and the chiral restoration phase transition is always of first order . | the influence of strong external magnetic fields on the structure of the qcd phase diagram is a very important field of research due to its consequences on several physical phenomena : the measurements in heavy ion collisions at very high energies , the behavior of the first stages of the universe and the understanding of compact astrophysical objects like magnetars . the inclusion of a magnetic field in the lagrangian density of the nambu jona - lasinio ( njl ) model and of the polyakov nambu
jona - lasinio ( pnjl ) model gives rise to the magnetic catalysis ( mc ) effect , i.e. , the enhancement of the quark condensate due to the magnetic field @xcite , but fails to account for the inverse magnetic catalysis ( imc ) found in lqcd calculations @xcite where the suppression of the quark condensate takes place due to the strong screening effect of the gluon interactions . in order to overcome this discrepancy ,
it was proposed , by using the su(2 ) njl model @xcite and the su(3 ) njl / pnjl models @xcite , that the model coupling , @xmath0 , can be seen as proportional to the running coupling , @xmath1 , and consequently , a decreasing function of the magnetic field strength allowing to include the impact of @xmath2 in both models .
indeed , the strong screening effect of the gluon interactions in the region of low momenta weakens the interaction which is reflected into a decrease of the scalar coupling with the intensity of the magnetic field @xcite . since there is no lqcd data available for @xmath2 , by using the njl model we can fit @xmath3 in order to reproduce the pseudocritical chiral transition temperatures , @xmath4 , obtained in lqcd calculations @xcite . the resulting fit function that reproduces the @xmath4 is @xmath5 with @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 , and @xmath9 and where @xmath10 .
we also have used @xmath11 mev . in the njl model , the renormalized pseudocritical chiral transition temperatures , @xmath12 ,
are plotted in left panel of fig .
[ fig : temp_crit ] as a function of @xmath13 : with the magnetic field dependent coupling @xmath3 ( green line ) , given by eq .
( [ eq : fit ] ) ; with lqcd results ( red dots ) ; and the usual constant coupling @xmath14 ( black dashed dot line ) , that shows magnetic catalyzes with increasing @xmath12 for all range of magnetic fields .
mev ) as a function of @xmath13 in the njl model with a magnetic field dependent coupling @xmath3 and a constant coupling @xmath15 , and the lattice results @xcite .
( right panel ) the chiral ( @xmath16 ) and deconfinement ( @xmath17 ) transitions temperatures as a function of @xmath13 in the pnjl , using @xmath3 given by eq .
( [ eq : fit ] ) .
, title="fig : " ] mev ) as a function of @xmath13 in the njl model with a magnetic field dependent coupling @xmath3 and a constant coupling @xmath15 , and the lattice results @xcite .
( right panel ) the chiral ( @xmath16 ) and deconfinement ( @xmath17 ) transitions temperatures as a function of @xmath13 in the pnjl , using @xmath3 given by eq .
( [ eq : fit ] ) .
, title="fig : " ] now , using @xmath3 given in eq .
( [ eq : fit ] ) , we calculate the chiral and deconfinement transitions temperatures as a function of @xmath13 in the pnjl model .
the results are shown in the right panel of fig .
[ fig : temp_crit ] : due to the existing coupling between the polyakov loop field and quarks within the pnjl model , the @xmath3 does not only affect the chiral transition but also the deconfinement transition .
consequently , both temperatures transitions decrease with increasing magnetic filed strength .
the nature of the phase transition and the existence of the critical end point ( cep ) are open issues for theoretical studies about the qcd phase diagram @xcite . from the experimental point of view
the existence / location of the cep is also a very timely topic .
this renders important to know the conditions that can change the position of the cep in the phase diagram , namely the presence of strong magnetic fields . in the following ,
we will study two scenarios for the effect of a static external magnetic field on the location of the cep when symmetric matter ( @xmath18 ) is considered : + case i @xmath19 where we take the usual @xmath14 and no imc effects are included ; + case ii @xmath19 where we will use @xmath3 given by eq .
( [ eq : fit ] ) which will allow us to consider the imc effects on the qcd phase diagram . the results for case i are plotted in the left panel of fig .
[ cep ] and reproduce qualitatively the results previously obtained within the njl model in @xcite : as the intensity of the magnetic field increases , the transition temperature increases and the baryonic chemical potential decreases until the critical value @xmath20 gev@xmath21 . for stronger magnetic fields both @xmath22 and @xmath23 increase . in the right panel of fig .
[ cep ] the cep is given in a @xmath22 versus baryonic density plot .
it is seen that when @xmath13 increases from 0 to 1 gev@xmath21 the baryonic density at the cep increases from 2@xmath24 to @xmath25 @xcite . with respect to case ii
the results for the cep are presented in fig .
[ cep_imc ] , red points .
we clearly observe a different behavior when compared with case i ( black points ) : at @xmath26 both cep s coincide but , already for small values of @xmath27 , the cep is moved to lower temperatures and chemical potentials .
nevertheless , until @xmath28 gev@xmath21 the pattern is similar for both cases .
however , for stronger magnetic fields the position of the cep in case ii oscillates between @xmath29 and @xmath30 mev while the chemical potential takes increasingly smaller values : a completely different behavior when compared with case i , where both values of @xmath22 and @xmath23 for the cep increase .
the reason of this behavior lies in fact that the restoration of chiral symmetry is stressed by the decreasing of the coupling @xmath3 .
the increasing of the magnetic filed is not sufficient to counteract this effect as can be seen if fig .
[ cep_mass ] , where we plot the quarks masses ( @xmath31-black line ; @xmath32-red line ; @xmath33-blue line ) as function of @xmath23 for the respective temperature where the cep occurs ( @xmath34 ) at @xmath35 and @xmath36 gev@xmath21 . at @xmath35 gev@xmath21 ( left panel )
@xmath0 is barely affected by the magnetic field , the values of the quark masses are very close to each other for both cases , and the cep occurs at smaller temperatures and at close , but smaller , chemical potentials . when @xmath36 gev@xmath21 , the quark masses in case i are increased with respect to the @xmath26 case ( due to mc effect ) , being the restoration of chiral symmetry more difficult to achieve . however , when @xmath3 , case ii , the masses of the quarks are already smaller than the @xmath26 case ( due to imc effect ) leading to an faster restoration of chiral symmetry at small temperatures and chemical potentials .
eventually , with the increase of @xmath27 , the cep would disappear in the temperature axis and the transition to the chiral restored phase is always of first order .
this work was partially supported by project no .
pest - oe / fis / ui0405 /2014 developed under the initiative qren financed by the ue / feder through the program compete @xmath19 `` programa operacional factores de competitividade '' , and by grant no .
sfrh / bd/51717/2011 from fct .
r. l. s. farias , k. p. gomes , g. i. krein and m. b. pinto , phys .
c * 90 * ( 2014 ) 025203 , [ arxiv:1404.3931 [ hep - ph ] ] .
m. ferreira , p. costa , o. loureno , t. frederico and c. providncia , phys .
d * 89 * ( 2014 ) 116011 , [ arxiv:1404.5577 [ hep - ph ] ] . | influence magnetic fields on qcd phase diagram important to consequences physical phenomena measurements heavy ion collisions at high energies behavior first stages universe understanding of compact astrophysical objects like magnetars inclusion magnetic field in lagrangian density nambu jona - polyakov model magnetic catalysis effect enhancement quark condensate due to magnetic field account for inverse magnetic catalysis in lqcd calculations @xcite suppression quark condensate due to screening effect gluon interactions to overcome discrepancy proposed su(2 ) njl su(3 ) njl models model coupling @xmath0 proportional to running coupling @xmath1 decreasing magnetic field strength impact of @xmath2 in both models strong screening effect gluon interactions in low momenta weakens interaction scalar coupling with intensity magnetic field no lqcd data for @xmath2 njl model fit @xmath3 reproduce pseudocritical chiral transition temperatures @xmath4 in lqcd calculations @xcite resulting fit function reproduces @xmath4 is @xmath5 with @xmath6 @xmath10 used @xmath11njl model renormalized pseudocritical chiral transition temperatures @xmath12 plotted left panel fig . temp_crit function @xmath13 magnetic field dependent coupling @xmath3 green line given eq . lqcd results red dots usual constant coupling @xmath14 black dashed dot line magnetic catalyzes increasing @xmath12 magnetic fields function @xmath13 model magnetic field dependent coupling @xmath3 constant coupling @xmath15 lattice results @xcite right panel chiral @xmath16 deconfinement @xmath17 ) transitions temperatures function @xmath13 pnjl @xmath3 given eq . function @xmath13 njl model magnetic field dependent coupling @xmath3 constant coupling @xmath15 lattice results @xcite right panel chiral @xmath16 deconfinement @xmath17 ) transitions temperatures function @xmath13 pnjl using @xmath3 given eq . fit using @xmath3 eq . calculate chiral deconfinement transitions temperatures function @xmath13 pnjl model results shown right panel fig . temp_crit existing coupling polyakov loop field quarks @xmath3 chiral deconfinement transitiontemperatures transitions decrease increasing magnetic strength phase transition critical end point cep open issues for theoretical studies qcd phase diagram @xcite existence location cep timely topic important know conditions position cep presence strong magnetic fields study two scenarios effect static external magnetic field on location cep symmetric matter @xmath18 case i @xmath19 usual @xmath14 no imc effects case ii @xmath19 @xmath3 imc effects on qcd phase diagram results for case i plotted in left panel fig . cep reproduce results model intensity magnetic field increases transition temperature increases baryonic chemical potential decreases until critical value @xmath20 gev@xmath21 stronger magnetic fields @xmath22 @xmath23 increase cep cep @xmath22 versus baryonic density plot @xmath13 increases from 0 to 1 gev@xmath21 baryonic density at cep increases from 2@xmath24 to @xmath25 case ii results for cep presented in fig . [ cep_imc ] points different behavior with case i at @xmath26 cep s coincide values @xmath27 cep moved to lower temperatures chemical potentialsuntil @xmath28 gev@xmath21 pattern similar for both cases stronger magnetic fields position cep case ii oscillates between @xmath29 and @xmath30 chemical potential smaller values different behavior compared with case i values @xmath22 and @xmath23 cep increase restoration chiral symmetry stressed by decreasing coupling @xmath3 increasing magnetic filed not sufficient fig . [ cep_mass ] quarks masses ( @xmath31 function of @xmath23 for temperature cep occurs at @xmath35 and @xmath36 gev@xmath21 @xmath35 gev@xmath21 @xmath0 barely affected by magnetic field values quark masses close cep occurs at smaller temperatures chemical potentials when @xmath36 gev@xmath21 quark masses increased to restoration chiral symmetry difficult @xmath3 case ii masses quarks smaller than @xmath26 faster restoration chiral symmetry at small temperatures chemical potentials increase of @xmath27 cep temperature axis transition to chiral restored phase first order work supported by project no .pest oe fis ui0405 /2014 initiative qren financed ue feder program @xmath19 programa operacional factores competitividade grant sfrh bd/51717/2011 fct farias gomes krein pinto . 90 2014 ) 025203 arxiv:1404.3931 hep - ph m ferreira costa loureno frederico providncia . d 89 2014 ) 116011 arxiv:1404.5577 hep - ph | 0.311639 | 1,956 | 1,009 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,858 | the results of searches for supersymmetry in events with two same - sign isolated leptons , hadronic jets , and missing transverse energy in the final state are presented .
the searches use @xmath0 collisions at 7 @xmath1collected in 2011 by the cms experiment . | events containing isolated same - sign dileptons are very rare in the standard model ( sm ) , but can occur quite naturally in many different new physics models , including supersymmetry ( susy ) @xcite and universal extra dimensions @xcite .
isolated same - sign lepton pairs are thus a very clean experimental signature for new physics searches . in addition , the analysis described in this talk requires significant missing transverse energy ( @xmath2 ) and hadronic activity in the form of high-@xmath3 jets .
the choice of signal regions is influenced by two experimental observations .
first , astrophysical evidence for dark matter @xcite suggests the need for a massive , weakly - interacting stable particle which gives rise to final states with @xmath2 .
second , new physics signals with observably large cross sections are likely to be the result of strong interactions , and we therefore expect them to be accompanied by significant hadronic activity . aside from these requirements ,
our searches are as independent of the particular details of new physics models as possible .
the data used in this analysis were collected in @xmath0 collisions at a center - of - mass energy of 7 @xmath1by the compact muon solenoid ( cms ) detector at the large hadron collider ( lhc ) in 2011 .
they comprise a total integrated luminosity of 0.98 .
an example susy cascade decay leading to jets , @xmath4 , and same - sign dileptons is shown in figure [ figure1 ] .
the produced gluinos or squarks decay to charged gauginos , which subsequently decay to the lightest supersymmetric particle ( lsp ) neutralino .
the mass difference between the gluinos / squarks and the charged gaugino , typically arbitrary , defines the amount of hadronic activity expected in the event .
the mass difference between the gaugino and neutralino influences the lepton @xmath5spectrum .
further , there is a range of scenarios where a large production asymmetry exists between the @xmath6 lepton and the @xmath7 leptons .
the range of mass differences motivates a variety of selection criteria in order to cover the widest possible phase space , while the possible tau production asymmetry motivates us to look specifically at events containing taus .
electrons , muons , and hadronically decaying taus are all included in the analysis .
lepton candidates are required to have @xmath8 and to be consistent with originating from the same interaction vertex .
electron candidates @xcite consist of an energy cluster in the electromagnetic calorimeter ( ecal ) matched to hits in the tracker .
the identification of electrons is based on the shape of their electromagnetic shower in the ecal as well as track - cluster matching .
the criteria are designed to maximally reject electron candidates from qcd multijet production , and are approximately 80% efficient for electrons from the decay of @xmath9 bosons .
muon candidates @xcite must be reconstructed via two separate algorithms : tracker muons are seeded from hits in the tracker and are matched to signals in the calorimeters and muon systems .
global muons are constructed from a simultaneous fit to hits in both the tracker and muon chambers .
the identification efficiency measured in data is approximately 96% for muons of all momenta
. jets and @xmath4are reconstructed via the particle flow ( pf ) technique @xcite , which takes signals in each detector component and reconstructs physics objects from them before running jet clustering algorithms .
the hadronic jets in this analysis use the anti-@xmath10clustering algorithm with a cone of @xmath11 in @xmath12 space .
hadronic tau candidates @xcite are reconstructed starting from jets .
a variable size cone of @xmath13 is defined around the leading track , and the @xmath6 decay products are required to be confined within this cone .
the analysis starts from an initial selection of two same - sign leptons with @xmath14 for muons , electrons , and taus , respectively , and @xmath8 .
two jets with @xmath15 and @xmath16 are also required , and we further require @xmath17 and @xmath18 . this initial selection is further divided into three baseline selections : the _ inclusive _ selection for the @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 final states requires @xmath22 .
the _ high-@xmath5 _
selection for the @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 final states requires @xmath23 .
the tau - specific selection requires at least one of the final state particles is a tau ( @xmath24 , @xmath25 , or @xmath26 ) with @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
we constrain the baseline selection regions with the following search regions : * _ high-@xmath29 , high-@xmath4 _ : @xmath30 and @xmath31 , providing a high expected sensitivity to points in the constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model ( cmssm ) @xcite with low values of @xmath32 . * _
medium-@xmath29 , high-@xmath4 _ : @xmath22 and @xmath31 , targeting models with moderate mass - splittings between squarks / gluinos and gauginos . * _
high-@xmath29 , low-@xmath4 _ : @xmath30 and @xmath33 , providing a high expected sensitivity to cmssm parameter points with high values of @xmath32 . * _
low-@xmath29 , high-@xmath4 _ : @xmath17 and @xmath34 , providing a high expected sensitivity to models predicting low hadronic activity with high @xmath4 .
figure [ fig : figure2 ] shows the events observed in data on the @xmath29-@xmath4plane for each baseline selection categories , with the dashed and dotted lines indicating the various search regions .
backgrounds are divided into categories based on how many prompt leptons they contain .
rare processes like @xmath35 and @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , and @xmath39 can produce actual prompt same - sign leptons .
these are evaluated from monte carlo ( mc ) simulation and found to contribute between 10% and 40% of the total background .
a 50% systematic uncertainty is applied to the value .
processes such as @xmath40 and @xmath41 produce opposite - sign prompt leptons . in cases where the charge of one of the leptons is misreconstructed , these events constitute an additional background to the search .
they are evaluated in data and found to contribute less than 10% to the total background .
events with `` fake '' leptons from jets also contribute . here
, a fake lepton can be a lepton produced in a heavy flavor quark decay as well as a light jet that is misidentified as a lepton .
this is also evaluated in data , and is found to be the dominant effect . in order to evaluate this fake rate , the analysis loosens the lepton selection criteria ( such as lepton isolation requirements ) to define a set of `` fakeable objects '' . the ratio of lepton candidates passing the full selection ( _ tight _ leptons ) to lepton candidates passing this looser selection but failing the full selection ( _ loose _ leptons ) is then determined for qcd multijet events with a jet above a given threshold .
this tight - to - loose ( tl ) ratio is shown for both electrons and muons in figure [ fig : figure10 ] .
a summary of the background predictions as well as the number of observed events is shown for each channel in the three baseline selection regions in figure [ fig : figure3 ] .
for the inclusive and high-@xmath5dilepton selections , two sets of complementary methods are used to measure the backgrounds , as indicated by the two bars associated with each channel .
these methods compare well with each other , providing mutually consistent background predictions .
table [ table1 ] shows the events observed for each selection region , along with the total background predictions .
we see no evidence of an event yield in excess of the background predictions and set 95% cl upper limits on the number of observed events using a hybrid frequentist - bayesian cl method @xcite with nuisance parameters and the signal strengh maximizing the ratio of the signal - with - background to background - only likelihoods .
these limits are indicated in the bottom row of the table . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ table1 ]
it is necessary to convey the information shown in table [ table1 ] in a form that can be used to test a variety of specific physics models .
this is done by using generator - level simulation studies as approximations for the models .
this was shown to be sufficiently precise to reproduce constraints on new physics models that would otherwise require the full cms detector simulation .
we take as a benchmark point the low - mass cmssm parameter point lm6 .
the efficiency of the lepton selection is shown in figure [ fig : figure16 ] as a function of @xmath5 , and the efficiency of the @xmath29and @xmath4selection is shown in figure [ fig : figure17 ] as a function of the reconstructed @xmath29and @xmath4 , respectively .
this efficiency dependence can be parametrized by error functions to determine the overall selection efficiency for new physics signals .
in order to provide a reference for other susy searches , the results are interpreted in the context of the cmssm model .
the observed upper limits on the number of signal events shown in table [ table1 ] for the high-@xmath29 , high-@xmath4search region of the high-@xmath5dilepton baseline selection are compared to the expected number of events in the cmssm model in a plane of ( @xmath42 ) for @xmath43 , @xmath44 , and @xmath45 .
all points on this plane with mean expected values in excess of this limit are interpreted as excluded at the 95% cl .
this excluded region is shown in figure [ figure5 ] .
the shaded region represents the uncertainty on the position of the limit due to uncertainty in the production cross section of cmssm .
a search for new physics was performed in the same - sign dilepton channel , including final states with electrons , muons , and taus .
all major background sources were estimated directly from data .
events with a single fake lepton were found to be the dominant background in all channels of the search with the exception of the @xmath26 channel , where two fake @xmath6 leptons were the primary background contribution .
no evidence was seen for an excess over the background prediction .
we therefore set 95% cl upper limits on the number of signal events within @xmath8 with 0.98 of data .
these limits are reported as an exclusion curve in cmssm parameter space . | isolated same - sign dileptons rare in standard model occur in new physics models supersymmetry @xcite universal extra dimensions isolated same - sign lepton pairs clean experimental signature for new physics searches analysis requires missing transverse energy @xmath2 hadronic activity high-@xmath3 jets choice of signal regions influenced by observations astrophysical evidence for dark matter @xcite massive weakly - interacting stable particle new physics signals with large cross sections result of strong interactions expect significant hadronic activity searches independent of details new physics models data collected in @xmath0 collisions at center - of - mass energy of 7 @xmath1by at large hadron collider in 2011 total integrated luminosity of 0.98 susy cascade decay to jets @xmath4 same - sign dileptons shown in figure gluinos squarks decay to charged gauginos to lightest supersymmetric particle neutralino mass difference between gluinos charged gaugino defines hadronic activity difference influences lepton @xmath5spectrumlarge production asymmetry between @xmath6 @xmath7 leptons mass differences motivates selection criteria phase space tau production asymmetry events taus electrons muons hadronically decaying taus included analysis lepton candidates required have @xmath8 same interaction vertex electron candidates @xcite energy cluster electromagnetic calorimeter matched to hits tracker identification electrons on shape electromagnetic shower track - cluster matching criteria reject electron candidates from qcd multijet production 80% efficient for electrons from decay of @xmath9 bosons muon candidates reconstructed via algorithms tracker muons seeded from hits matched to signals calorimeters muon systems global muons constructed from simultaneous fit hits tracker muon chambers identification efficiency 96% for muons all momenta jets @xmath4are reconstructed via particle flow technique objects hadronic jets use anti-@xmath10clustering algorithm with cone of @xmath11 in @xmath12 space hadronic tau candidates reconstructed from jets variable size cone of @xmath13 defined around leading track @xmath6 decay products confined within coneanalysis starts initial selection two same - sign leptons @xmath14 muons electrons taus @xmath8 two jets @xmath15 @xmath16 required @xmath17 @xmath18 selection divided into three baseline selections inclusive requires @xmath22 high-@xmath5 requires @xmath23 tau - specific selection requires one final state tau @xmath24 with @xmath27 @xmath28 constrain baseline selection regions search regions high-@xmath29@xmath4 @xmath30 @xmath31 high sensitivity points supersymmetric standard model low values @xmath32 medium-@xmath29 high-@xmath4 @xmath22 @xmath31 models moderate mass - splittings between squarks gluinos gauginos high-@xmath29 low-@xmath4 @xmath30 @xmath33 high to cmssm parameter points with high values @xmath32 low-@xmath29 high-@xmath4 @xmath17 @xmath34 high sensitivity models predicting low hadronic activity with high @xmath4 figure shows events observed data @xmath29-@xmath4plane baseline selection categories dashed dotted lines search regionsbackgrounds divided into based prompt leptons rare processes like @xmath35 can produce actual prompt same - sign leptons evaluated contribute 10% and 40% total background 50% systematic uncertainty applied value processes @xmath40 @xmath41 produce opposite - sign prompt leptons charge misreconstructed events constitute additional background evaluated contribute less than 10% to total background events with fake '' leptons from jets contribute fake lepton can be produced in heavy flavor quark decay light jet misidentified as evaluated dominant effect evaluate fake rate analysis loosens lepton selection criteria to define fakeable objects ratio of lepton candidates passing full selection to looser selection failing selection determined for qcd multijet events with jet above threshold tight - to - loose ratio shown for electrons and muons in figure figure10 summary of background predictions number of observed events shown for each channel in three baseline selection regions in figure figure3 ] for inclusive high-@xmath5dilepton selections two complementary methods to measure backgrounds indicated by two bars each channel methods compare consistent background predictionstable shows events observed each selection region total background predictions no evidence event yield excess background predictions set 95% cl upper limits on observed events using hybrid frequentist - bayesian cl method nuisance parameters signal strengh maximizing signal - with - background to background - only likelihoods limits indicated bottom row table cols=" " necessary to convey information form test specific physics models generator - level simulation studies approximations models precise reproduce constraints new physics models full detector simulation benchmark point low - mass cmssm parameter point lm6 efficiency of lepton selection shown figure function of @xmath5 efficiency @xmath29and @xmath4selection function reconstructed @xmath29and @xmath4 efficiency dependence parametrized by error functions overall selection efficiency for new physics signals results interpreted in context cmssm model observed upper limits on signal events table for high-@xmath29 high-@xmath4search region high-@xmath5dilepton baseline selection compared to expected number events in cmssm model plane @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 points plane values limit excluded at 95% cl excluded region in figure shaded region uncertainty limit production cross section cmssm search for new physics same - sign dilepton channel states electrons muons taus background sources estimated from data events single fake lepton dominant background in channels exception @xmath26 channel two fake @xmath6 leptons primary background no evidence excess over background prediction set 95% cl upper limits signal events within @xmath8 with 0.98 data limits reported as exclusion curve in cmssm parameter space | 0.354537 | 2,394 | 1,210 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,871 | we consider the finite temperature casimir force acting on two parallel plates in a closed cylinder with the same cross section of arbitrary shape in the presence of extra dimensions .
dirichlet boundary conditions are imposed on one plate and fractional neumann conditions with order between zero ( dirichlet ) and one ( neumann ) are imposed on the other plate .
formulas for the casimir force show that it is always attractive for dirichlet boundary conditions , and is always repulsive when the fractional order is larger than @xmath0 . for some fractional orders
less than @xmath0 , the casimir force can be either attractive or repulsive depending on the size of the internal manifold and temperature . | piston configurations have received considerable interest because they allow for an unambiguous prediction of casimir forces @xcite .
the force depends on the boundary conditions imposed , the cross section of the piston and on properties of additional kaluza - klein dimensions that might be present@xcite . in this contribution
we consider the same geometrical setting as in refs.@xcite , but with fractional boundary conditions imposed .
this is an extension of ref .
@xcite to the case where additional dimensions are considered .
consider a massive scalar field @xmath1 of mass @xmath2 in the background spacetime @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is the @xmath5-dimensional minkowski spacetime and @xmath6 is a compact @xmath7-dimensional internal manifold .
we want to find the casimir force acting between two parallel plates with arbitrary shape in a cylinder of constant simply connected cross section @xmath8 .
to interpolate between dirichlet and neumann boundary conditions , we consider fractional neumann conditions @xmath9,\ ] ] on the plates .
it can be shown that the casimir force only depends on the difference @xmath10 . therefore without loss of generality , we fix dirichlet boundary conditions on the left plate and impose fractional neumann conditions of order @xmath11 on the right plate . for concreteness , on the walls of the cylinder dirichlet boundary conditions are imposed . using the piston approach@xcite
, we first consider the casimir force acting on a piston moving freely inside a closed cylinder @xmath12\times \omega \times \mathcal{n}$ ] , and let the right end of the cylinder go to infinity , i.e. , @xmath13 .
let @xmath14 denotes the position of the piston .
the finite temperature casimir force acting on the piston is given by @xmath15where @xmath16 is the finite temperature casimir energy inside the closed cylinder @xmath17\times \omega \times \mathcal{n}$ ] ; formally @xmath18 the eigenfrequencies of the field @xmath1 which satisfies dirichlet boundary conditions on the plate at @xmath19 and the wall @xmath20\times \partial\omega\times\mathcal{n}$ ] of the cylinder , and fractional neumann conditions of order @xmath11 on the plate at @xmath14 , are given by @xmath21 here , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , are the eigenvalues for the laplace operator with dirichlet boundary conditions on @xmath8 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , are the eigenvalues of the laplace operator on @xmath26 , with @xmath27 . for generic @xmath28 , @xmath29 . for @xmath30 or 1 , @xmath31 . in the following
we shall assume @xmath28 ; for @xmath32 and @xmath33 the casimir force will have to be divided by two .
it is worth mentioning that if one considers a cylinder of length @xmath34 instead of @xmath35 and if one imposes twisted boundary conditions @xmath36 for a complex massive scalar field @xmath1 , one obtains the same set of eigenfrequencies . using the zeta regularization method to compute the casimir energy , we find that @xmath37where @xmath38 and @xmath39 are terms that are independent of @xmath35 .
@xmath40 does not contribute to the casimir force acting on the piston , and we find by taking the limit @xmath13 in that the casimir force acting between two parallel plates is @xmath41this expression shows that in the high temperature limit , the leading term of the casimir force is linear in @xmath42 given by the sum of the terms with @xmath43 , which is usually called the classical term .
for the low temperature behavior , some computations give ( we use the notation @xmath44 ) @xmath45 the first two terms are the zero temperature casimir force .
the sum of the last two terms is the thermal correction .
it goes to zero exponentially fast when @xmath46 . for a pair of dirichlet - dirichlet plates , i.e.
, @xmath30 , ( divided by two ) shows that the casimir force is always attractive ( negative ) . for dirichlet - neumann plates , i.e. , @xmath47 , ( divided by two )
shows that the casimir force is always repulsive .
in fact , this is true for all @xmath48 since the function @xmath49is positive for @xmath48 and @xmath50 . in all these cases
the force is enhanced by the presence of extra dimensions . for @xmath51
, one can show that when the plate separation is large enough , the casimir force eventually becomes attractive .
when the plate separation @xmath35 is much smaller than the size @xmath52 of the cross section , some computations show that the leading term of the casimir force density acting on the plates is @xmath53where @xmath54 . in the massless case
( @xmath55 ) , the sum of the terms with @xmath56 should be replaced by @xmath57 a form of more suitable to study the low temperature behavior is @xmath58 when @xmath55 , the sum of the terms with @xmath59 in should be replaced by @xmath60one can show that when @xmath61 , the massive correction to the casimir force is of order @xmath62
. therefore , and show that when @xmath61 and @xmath63 , where @xmath64 is the size of the internal manifold , the nature of the casimir force is determined by the sign of @xmath65with @xmath66 if @xmath67 and @xmath68 if @xmath69 . for any @xmath70 ,
the function @xmath71 $ ] is a monotonically decreasing function and it has a unique zero @xmath72 in @xmath73 $ ] .
one can show that @xmath74 .
therefore , we find that when @xmath75 , for @xmath76 , the casimir force can change from attractive to repulsive when one increases the temperature . on the other hand ,
when the plate separation @xmath35 becomes much smaller than the size of the internal manifold , then the internal manifold should be treated in the same way as the large cross section . in this case , we find that the sign of the casimir force is determined by @xmath77 with @xmath78 if @xmath67 and with @xmath79 if @xmath69 .
again , we see that decreasing the distance between the plates such that it is much smaller than the size of the internal manifold can change the casimir force from repulsive to attractive for some values of @xmath11 . 9 r.m .
cavalcanti , _ casimir force on a piston _ , phys .
d * 69 * ( 2004 ) , 065015 .
hertzberg , r.l .
jaffe , m. kardar and a. scardicchio , _ attractive casimir forces in a closed geometry _ , phys .
* 95 * ( 2005 ) , 250402 .
v. marachevsky , _
casimir interaction of two plates inside a cylinder _ , phys .
d * 75 * ( 2007 ) , 085019 .
teo , _ finite temperature casimir effect in kaluza - klein spacetime _ , nucl .
b * 819 * ( 2009 ) , 431452 .
k. kirsten and s.a .
fulling , _ kaluza - klein models as pistons _ , phys .
d * 79 * ( 2009 ) , 065019 .
s.c . lim and l.p .
teo , _ repulsive casimir force from fractional neumann boundary conditions _ ,
b * 679 * ( 2009 ) , 130137 .
e. elizalde , s.d .
odintsov and a.a .
saharian , _ repulsive casimir effect from extra dimensions and robin boundary conditions : from branes to pistons _ , phys .
d * 79 * ( 2009 ) , 065023 . | piston configurations allow unambiguous prediction casimir forces force depends on boundary conditions cross section piston properties additional kaluza - klein dimensions same geometrical setting fractional boundary conditions extension of ref @xcite additional dimensions consider massive scalar field @xmath1 of mass @xmath2 in background spacetime @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5-dimensional minkowski spacetime @xmath6 compact @xmath7-dimensional internal manifold casimir force acting between two parallel plates arbitrary shape in cylinder constant cross section interpolate dirichlet neumann boundary conditions consider fractional neumann conditions on plates casimir force depends on difference @xmath10 fix dirichlet boundary conditions on left plate impose fractional neumann conditions on right plate walls cylinder dirichlet boundary conditions imposed piston approach consider casimir force acting on piston moving inside closed cylinder right end of cylinder to infinity @xmath14 denotes position pistonfinite temperature casimir force on piston by @xmath16 finite temperature energy inside closed cylinder @xmath17 @xmath18 eigenfrequencies field @xmath1 dirichlet boundary conditions plate @xmath19 wall @xmath20 cylinder fractional neumann conditions @xmath11 @xmath14 given by @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 eigenvalues for laplace operator dirichlet boundary conditions @xmath8 @xmath24 @xmath25 eigenvalues laplace operator @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath28 @xmath32 @xmath33 casimir force divided by two cylinder length @xmath34 @xmath35 twisted boundary conditions @xmath36 for complex massive scalar field @xmath1 obtains same eigenfrequencies zeta regularization method compute casimir energy @xmath38 @xmath39 independent of @xmath35 @xmath40 contribute to casimir force piston casimir force between two parallel plates is @xmath41this high temperature limit leading term casimir force linear in @xmath42 sum terms with @xmath43 classical termlow temperature behavior computations give notation @xmath44 ) @xmath45 first two terms zero temperature casimir force sum last two terms thermal correction goes to zero fast @xmath46 dirichlet - dirichlet plates @xmath30 casimir force attractive negative dirichlet - neumann plates @xmath47 casimir force repulsive true @xmath48 function @xmath49is positive @xmath48 @xmath50 force enhanced by extra dimensions @xmath51 plate separation large casimir force becomes attractive plate separation @xmath35 smaller than size @xmath52 cross section computations leading term casimir force density plates @xmath53where @xmath54 massless case @xmath55 sum terms @xmath56 replaced by @xmath57 low temperature behavior @xmath58 @xmath55 sum terms @xmath59 replaced by @xmath60one @xmath61 massive correction casimir force order @xmath62 @xmath61 @xmath63 @xmath64 size internal manifold nature casimir force determined by sign @xmath65with @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69@xmath70 function @xmath71 monotonically decreasing unique zero @xmath72 in @xmath73 $ @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 casimir force attractive to repulsive increases temperature plate separation @xmath35 smaller than internal manifold internal manifold treated large cross section casimir force determined by @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath67 @xmath79 @xmath69 decreasing distance between plates smaller than size internal manifold casimir force from repulsive to attractive values @xmath11 cavalcanti casimir force on piston . * 69 * 2004 ) 065015 hertzberg jaffe kardar scardicchio attractive casimir forces in closed geometry phys. 95 * 2005 ) 250402 marachevsky casimir interaction of two plates cylinder phys 75 * 2007 ) 085019 teo finite temperature casimir effect in kaluza - klein spacetime 819 * 2009 ) 431452 kirsten fulling kaluza - klein models as pistons phys . * 79 * 2009 065019 limteo repulsive casimir force fractional neumann boundary conditions 679 2009 130137 elizalde odintsov saharian repulsive casimir effect extra dimensions robin boundary conditions branes pistons d 79 2009 065023 | 0.307537 | 1,792 | 956 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,873 | we consider three jet production at high @xmath0 in the @xmath1 process and calculate quark and gluon jet spectra .
the possibility of quark - gluon jet separation is discussed and compared with the @xmath2 case . | three jet production in @xmath3 annihilation was investigated in details at petra and later at tristan energies @xcite in connection with the critical tests of perturbative qcd . in particular
the difference between energy spectra of quark and gluon jets and quark and gluon jet multiplicities provided important information for quantitative tests of quantum chromodynamics . besides the studies of hadronic final state as a result of direct @xmath4 annihilation , the measurement of the two photon processes @xmath5 at petra and tristan shows high physics potential .
new tests are possible in lep experiments , especially the precise meauserement of the photon structure function and hadron production at high @xmath0 @xcite at present time new experimental possibilities connected with the generation of @xmath6 beams by compton backscattering of the laser beam on a high energy electron beam @xcite are discussed extensively @xcite .
investigation of the jet phenomena in @xmath7 collisions at the energy of several hundred gev is one of the most interesting questions for @xmath7 colliders phenomenology . in this paper
we discuss three jet production in the region of large @xmath0 originated from t - channel quark exchange between the colliding photons . at next linear colliders energy
there are two other possible mechanisms for the jet production in high @xmath0 region with the cross sections of the same order @xcite : ( 1 ) gluon exchange between two pairs of quark jets ( 2 ) @xmath8 boson production .
however , they have different final state topologies and can easily be distinguished from the mechanism under consideration . at smaller @xmath0
the photon looks more like the hadron - like object and special treatment beyond the simple qcd tree approximation is necessary .
the aims of this paper are the calculation of high @xmath0 quark and gluon jets energy spectra in @xmath7 collisions and comparison of the results with the @xmath3 case .
the first order qcd calculation for three jet production in @xmath10 ( @xmath11 ) gives the following well - known result for the spectra @xcite : @xmath12 where @xmath13 are the energy fractions of quark , antiquark and gluon @xmath14 satisfying the equality @xmath15 distribution ( 1 ) defines the topology of the final state ( or topology of the primary process ) in @xmath3 collision . since quarks and gluons are unobservable , in the following various fragmentation models are used to generate real event samples .
however , event generation will be beyond our analysis at present stage .
the calculation in @xmath4 case for two feynman amplitudes only ( gluon is radiated from quark or antiquark leg ) is not technically difficult .
in @xmath7 case we have 6 amplitudes represented in fig.1 .
symbolic calculation for the corresponding 21 squared amplitudes could be more complicated . however , it is much simplified because the compact form of the result for the sum of 21 squared diagrams can be obtained @xcite : @xmath16 } { \prod_{i=1}^{3}\,(p_ip_4)\,(p_ip_5)}\ ] ] we reproduced this formula using comphep package @xcite for generation of symbolic result and reduce system @xcite in the following algebraic transformations . for the process
@xmath17 we are using the kinematical variables @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the angle between particle 1 and particle 4 in the c.m.s . of ( 1,2 ) , @xmath20 is the helicity angle between the planes ( 1,4 ) and ( 3,4 ) in the c.m.s of ( 3,5 ) .
the phase space in these variables takes the form @xmath21 in the case of @xmath22 process the matrix element has collinear singuliarities only . in the case of @xmath23 process additional t - channel singuliarity appears .
the denominator of the squared amplitude contains four momenta products ( see more details in the appendix ) @xmath24 where @xmath25 integration over @xmath20 leads to the structures @xmath26 and @xmath27 in the denominator ( see more details in appendix ) . for this reason besides the poles of matrix element for the scattering in forward - backward directions ( no gluon emission from final quark ) there are parametrically dependent poles at @xmath28 corresponding to the t - channel singuliarity in the diagrams with gluon emission from the quark leg .
( in this case the antiquark is emitted in the opposite hemisphere at zero angle ) .
while integrating over @xmath29 we introduced kinematical cuts @xmath30 and @xmath31 for quark near the forward pole and the poles defined by ( 13 ) .
after two integrations over the angular variales @xmath32 we obtain the following result for three jet spectra in @xmath7 collisions : @xmath33 \nonumber \\ & & \hspace{15 mm } \times [ { \rm ln } \frac{1}{2\epsilon_1\epsilon_2 ^ 2}+2 \,{\rm ln } \frac{\omega_1\omega_2 } { z_1 z_2 } - \frac{2(z_1+z_2 - 1)-z_1z_2}{z_1z_2}{\rm ln } \frac{\omega_1}{\omega_2 } ] \nonumber \\ & & \hspace{15 mm } + z_1 ^ 2 ( ( 1-z_1)^2(1-z_2)^2+z_2 ^ 4 ) { \rm ln } \frac{2}{\epsilon_1 } \nonumber \\ & & \hspace{15 mm } + z_2 ^ 2 ( ( 1-z_1)^2(1-z_2)^2+z_1 ^ 4 ) { \rm ln } \frac{\omega_1 \omega_2}{\epsilon_2 ^ 2 } \nonumber \\ & & \hspace{15 mm } + 2z_1 ^ 2z_2 ^ 2(z_1 ^ 2+z_2 ^ 2 ) { \rm ln } \frac{\omega_1}{2
z_1 z_2 } \nonumber \\ & & \hspace{15 mm } + z_1 ^ 4z_2+z_1z_2 ^ 4 -5z_1 ^ 3z_2 - 5z_1z_2 ^ 3 + 4z_1 ^ 2z_2 + 4z_1z_2 ^ 2 + z_1 ^ 2z_2 ^ 3+z_1 ^ 3z_2 ^ 2 \nonumber \\ & & \hspace{15 mm } + 4z_1 ^ 3 + 4z_2 ^ 3 - 4z_1 ^ 2z_2 ^ 2 -2z_1 ^ 2 - 2z_2 ^ 2 - 2z_1
^ 4 - 2z_2 ^ 4 \}\nonumber \\ & & \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath34 besides the collinear singuliarities in @xmath7 case the spectrum ( 14 ) has the factor @xmath35 in denominator and logarithmic terms originating from t - channel quark exchange .
kinematical cut for @xmath30 in the case of nonzero fermion masses is @xmath36 , it is easy to show that the cut for @xmath31 is of the same order .
we show double differential spectra of quark and gluon jets in @xmath3 and @xmath7 collisions ( ( 1),(14 ) ) at the energy scale @xmath37 in fig.2 . in the @xmath7 case
the cross section is an order of magnitude larger than for @xmath4 case .
the shape of the spectra are similar . in the case when there are no additional methods of quark and gluon jet identification the spectra are not measurable separately and the usual way of analysis is jet ordering in energy . in fig.3
we show single differential spectra of quark and gluon jets in the case of @xmath4 and @xmath7 collisions . in the @xmath4 case quark and gluon
jet spectra show large difference giving the possibility of good jet discrimination .
for instance , about 70% of the jets at @xmath38 less than @xmath39 are gluon jets and about 50% of the jets at @xmath38 between @xmath40 and @xmath41 are quark jets . in the @xmath7 case
the difference between the spectra is also well pronounced and identification possibilities of the quark and qluon jets by energy ordering seem not worse than for @xmath4 case .
improvement of jet identification in some experimental situations could be provided by flavor tagging @xcite or comparison of @xmath42 and @xmath43 event topologies [ 1 ] .
probably some combination of different methods can give optimal results .
* acknowledgements * the author is grateful to m.fontannaz , j.fujimoto , j.p.guillet , k.kato , t.munehiza and y.shimizu for useful comments and discussions .
the work was partially supported by isf ( grant m9b000 ) and intas ( grant 93 - 1180 , contract 1010-ct93 - 0024 ) .
in this section we shall show some details of the calculation taking squared amplitudes ( 1 ) and ( 5 ) ( see fig.1 ) as an example .
four momenta products in the variables ( 5 ) have the form @xmath44 where @xmath45 it is worth noticing that this set is not invariant under the transposition @xmath46 ( as long as we are using the @xmath47 c.m.s . as the reference frame ) .
the matrix element has the symmetry @xmath48 , so this symmetry must be restored in the final result for the spectra ( at least in the nondivergent terms , artificial cuts near the poles can break the symmetry ) .
squared diagrams ( 1 ) and ( 5 ) sum @xmath49 after the integration over the helicity angle @xmath20 takes the form @xmath50 where @xmath51 integration over @xmath29 must take into account two cases for the sign of the absolute value .
the physical region of the reaction @xmath9 in @xmath52 plane is the triangle with vertices ( 0,1);(1,0);(1,1 ) .
hyperbola reflecting the relation between @xmath53 for t - channel pole ( 13 ) crosses the physical region from ( 0,1 ) to ( 1,0 ) ( see berends et.al in [ 7 ] ) .
integration of the rational function @xmath54 gives the result for the spectrum @xmath55\end{aligned}\ ] ] calculation for the sum of 21 squared diagrams gives the same symbolic structures .
99 collected physics papers ( i ) of tristan experiments , kek , tsukuba , 1994 p.aurenche , a.douiri , r.baier , m.fontannaz , d.schiff , in:_physics at lep _ , ed.by j.ellis,r.peccei , cern report 86 - 02 , 1986 i.ginzburg , g.kotkin , v.serbo , v.telnov , nucl.instr.meth . 205
( 1983 ) 147 e.boos , m.dubinin , v.ilyin , a.pukhov , in:_@xmath4 collisions at 500 gev : the physics potential _ , ed.by p.zerwas , desy report 93 - 123c , 1993 , p.561 i.ginzburg , d.ivanov , v.serbo , in:_proc.of workshop on physics and experiments with linear @xmath4 colliders _ , ed.by f.harris , s.olsen , s.pakvasa , x.tata , world scientific , singapore , 1993 , p.600 j.ellis , m.k.gaillard , g.g.ross , nucl.phys.b111 ( 1976 ) 253 + t.a.degrand , y.j.ng , s.h.h.tye , phys.rev.d16 ( 1977 ) 3251 + a.derujula , j.ellis , e.g.floratos , m.k.gaillard , nucl.phys.b138 ( 1978 ) 387 + g.kramer , g.schierholz , phys.lett.82b ( 1979 ) 102 + p.hoyer , p.osland , h.g.sander , t.f.walsh , p.m.zerwas , nucl
b161 ( 1979 ) 349 + s.nandi , w.wada , phys.rev.d21 ( 1980 ) 76 + h.p.nilles , k.h.streng , phys.rev.d23 ( 1981 ) 1944 f.berends , z.kunszt , g.gastmans , phys.lett.92b ( 1980 ) 186 , nucl.phys.b182 ( 1981 ) 397 + p.aurenche , a.douiri , r.baier , m.fontannaz , d.schiff , z.phys.c24 ( 1984 ) 309 e.boos et.al.,in:_91 electroweak interactions and unified theories ( proc . of the xxvith recontre de moriond ) _ , ed.by j.tran than van , editions frontieres , 1991 , p.501 + e.boos et.al.,in : _ new computing techniques in physics research ii ( proc .
of the second int.workshop on software engineering , artificial intelligence and expert systems in high energy and nuclear physics ) _ , ed.by d.perret-gallix , world scientific , 1992 , p.665 + e.boos , m.dubinin , v.ilyin , a.pukhov , v.savrin , preprint inp msu 94 - 36/358 , 1994 ( * hep - ph/9503280 * ) reduce by a.c.hearn , rand corp .
, cp78 ( rev.7.91 ) , 1991 h.borner , p.grosse-wiesmann , in : _
@xmath3 collisions at 500 gev : the physics potential _ , ed.by p. zerwas , desy report 92 - 123a , 1992 , p.63
* feynman diagrams for @xmath9 .
* double differential spectra @xmath56 at fixed @xmath57 of parent quark and gluon in the reactions @xmath22 and @xmath9 ( @xmath58 ) . @xmath59 * differential spectra @xmath60 ( integrated over @xmath61 ) of parent quark and gluon in the reactions @xmath22 and @xmath9 ( @xmath58 ) . | jet production in @xmath3 annihilation investigated at petra tristan tests perturbative qcd difference between energy spectra quark gluon jets multiplicities information for tests quantum chromodynamics hadronic measurement of photon processes @xmath5 at petra tristan shows high physics potential new tests possible in lep experiments precise photon structure function hadron production at high @xmath0 possibilities generation @xmath6 beams by backscattering laser beam on high energy electron beam discussed investigation jet phenomena in @xmath7 collisions at several hundred gev interesting jet production large @xmath0 from t - channel quark exchange between colliding photons two other possible mechanisms for jet production high @xmath0 region gluon exchange between quark jets @xmath8 boson production different final state topologies distinguished at smaller @xmath0 photon looks like hadron - like object special treatment beyond qcd necessary aims calculation of high @xmath0 quark gluon jets energy spectra in @xmath7 collisions comparison with @xmath3 casefirst order qcd calculation three jet production @xmath10 gives result spectra @xcite @xmath12 energy fractions of quark antiquark gluon @xmath14 equality @xmath15 distribution defines topology final state @xmath3 collision quarks gluons unobservable fragmentation models used generate event samples event generation beyond analysis calculation @xmath4 two feynman amplitudes gluon radiated from quark antiquark not difficult @xmath7 6 amplitudes in.1 symbolic calculation 21 squared amplitudes complicated simplified compact form result sum 21 squared diagrams obtained reproduced formula using comphep package @xcite for symbolic result reduce system algebraic transformations process @xmath17 kinematical variables @xmath18 angle between particle 1 particle 4 ( 1,2 ) @xmath20 helicity angle between planes ( 1,4 ) ( 3,4 ) ( 3,5 ) phase space variables form @xmath21 @xmath22 process matrix element has collinear singuliarities @xmath23 additional t - channel singuliarity appearsdenominator squared amplitude contains four momenta products @xmath24 @xmath25 integration @xmath20 leads structures @xmath26 @xmath27 poles matrix element scattering forward backward no gluon emission quark parametrically dependent poles @xmath28 t - channel singuliarity gluon emission quark antiquark emitted opposite hemisphere zero angle integrating @xmath29 introduced kinematical cuts @xmath30 @xmath31 quark forward pole poles defined 13 ) two integrations angular variales @xmath32 result three jet spectra @xmath7 collisions @xmath33 \nonumber\hspace{15 mm\frac\epsilon_1_2 2\omega_1_2 z_1 z_2(z_1+z_2 1)-z_1z_2_2\omega_1_2\nonumber\hspace{15 mm z_1 2 1-z_1)^2(1-z_2)^2+z_2 ^ 4\frac{2\epsilon_1\nonumber\hspace{15 mm z_2 2 1-z_1)^2(1-z_2)^2+z_1 4\omega_1_2\epsilon_2 2\hspace{15 mm 2z_1 2z_2 2(z_1 2+z_2 2\omega_1 z_1 z_2\hspace{15 mm z_1 4z_2+z_1z_2 -5z_1 3z_2 5z_1z_2 4z_1 2z_2 4z_1z_2 z_1 2z_2 3+z_1 3z_2 ^ 2\hspace{15 mm 4z_1 3 + 4z_2 - 4z_1 2z_2 -2z_1 2 - 2z_2 ^ 2 - 2z_1 ^ 4 - 2z_2 ^ 4\nonumber{aligned @xmath34 collinear singuliarities @xmath7 spectrum ( 14 ) factor @xmath35 from t - channel quark exchange kinematical cut @xmath30 nonzero @xmath36 cut @xmath31 same double differential spectra quark gluon jets @xmath3 @xmath7 collisions energy scale @xmath37 fig.2 @xmath7 case cross section larger @xmath4 shape spectra similar no additional methods quark gluon jet identification spectra not measurable separately analysis jet ordering in energy.3 single differential spectra quark gluon jets @xmath4 @xmath7 collisions @xmath4 quark gluon jet spectra large difference good jet discrimination 70% jets @xmath38 are gluon jets 50% @xmath38 quark jets @xmath7 case difference spectra pronounced identification quark qluon jets energy ordering not worse @xmath4 improvement jet identification flavor tagging @xcite comparison @xmath42 @xmath43 event topologies combination different methods optimal results author grateful to m.fontannaz , j.fujimoto j.guillet k.kato t.munehiza y.shimizu comments discussions work supported isf grant m9b000 intas grant 93 - 1180 contract 1010-ct93 - 0024 details calculation amplitudes ( 1 ) 5 ) fig.1 momenta products variables 5 form @xmath44 @xmath45 not invariant transposition @xmath46 @xmath47 reference frame matrix element symmetry @xmath48 restored final result spectra artificial cuts poles break symmetry diagrams 1 ) 5 ) sum @xmath49 integration helicity angle @xmath20 form @xmath50 @xmath51 integration @xmath29 two cases absolute value physical region reaction @xmath9 @xmath52 plane triangle vertices ( 0,1);(1,0);(1,1 ) hyperbola relation @xmath53 t - channel pole ( 13 ) crosses physical region 0,1 ) to 1,0 ) berends integration rational function @xmath54 result spectrum @xmath55 calculation sum 21 squared diagrams symbolic structures 99 physics papers tristan experiments tsukuba 1994 p.aurenche a.douiri r.baier m.fontannaz d.schiff_physics lep.j.ellis.peccei report 86 - 02 1986.kotkin.serbo.telnov.meth 205 1983 ) 147.boos.dubinin v.ilyin.pukhov@xmath4 collisions 500 gev potential p.zerwas report 93 - 123c 1993.561.ginzburg.ivanov.serbo workshop experiments linear @xmath4 colliders f.harris s.olsen.pakvasa x.tata world scientific 1993 p.600.ellis.gaillard.g.ross.phys.b111 1976 ) 253.degrand y.j.ng.h.tye.rev.d16 1977 ) 3251.derujula j.ellis.floratos.gaillard.phys.b138 1978 ) 387.kramer.schierholz.lett.82b 1979 ) 102 p.hoyer.osland.sander.walsh.zerwas b161 1979 ) 349 s.nandi w.wada.rev.d21 1980 ) 76.p.nilles.streng.rev.d23 1981 ) 1944 f.berends z.kunszt.gastmans phys.lett.92b 1980 ) 186.phys.b182 1981 ) 397 p.aurenche.douiri.baier.fontannaz.schiff.phys.c24 1984 ) 309 e.boos electroweak interactions unified theories xxvith recontre moriond j.tran editions frontieres 1991 p.501 e.boos new computing techniques research second int.workshop software engineering artificial intelligence systems high energy nuclear d.perret-gallix world scientific 1992 p.665 e.boos.dubinin v.ilyin.pukhov.savrin preprint msu 94 - 36/358 1994 ph/9503280 a.c.hearn rand corp cp78 rev.7.91 1991 h.borner p.grosse-wiesmann @xmath3 collisions 500 gev physics potential zerwas report 92 - 123a 1992 p.63 feynman diagrams @xmath9 differential spectra @xmath56 @xmath57 parent quark gluon reactions @xmath22 differential spectra @xmath60 @xmath61 parent quark gluon | 0.497593 | 3,318 | 1,858 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,875 | we present swift observations of grb 051109b , a soft long burst triggered by the burst alert telescope ( bat ) .
the soft photon index of the prompt emission suggest it is a x - ray flash ( xrf ) or , at least , a x - ray rich ( xrr ) burst .
the x - ray lightcurve displays the canonical shape of many other grbs , a double broken power law with a small flare superimposed at @xmath0t@xmath1 + 1500 s , and its extrapolation to early times smoothly joins with the bat lightcurve . on the basis of the derived optical to x - ray flux ratio
, it can not be classified as a dark burst . | the @xmath2-ray lightcurve of grb 051109b shows a single soft peak , without a strong emission above 100 kev ( see fig .
[ fig : lc ] , left panel ) .
the estimated duration in the 15350 kev energy band is t@xmath3=15@xmath41 s @xcite .
a faint afterglow was detected by the x - ray telescope ( xrt ) @xmath086 s after the burst and monitored for the following 6 days .
although the burst location was promptly observed by ground - based telescopes ( e.g. at t+52 s by the rotse - iiib telescope ) @xcite and by the uvot ( at t+84 s ) @xcite , no optical counterpart was detected .
a nearby ( z=0.08 ) barred spiral galaxy has been proposed by @xcite as the putative host galaxy .
the field of grb 051109b was then re - observed by swift on aug 2006 but no late - time x - ray emission was seen in the 17 ks exposure pc image with a 3@xmath5 upper limit of 9.8@xmath610@xmath7ctss@xmath8 .
[ fig : lc ]
the time averaged spectrum of the prompt emission is well fit by a simple power law with a photon index of 1.9@xmath40.3 . a cut off powerlaw or a band model
do not improve significantly the fit , however fixing the first index @xmath9 of the band function @xmath10 , we put an upper limit to the e@xmath11 energy of 70 kev at the 90% confidence level .
the fluence in the 15150 kev energy band is @xmath02.1@xmath610@xmath12erg@xmath13 and , using the redshift value of 0.08 , we put a lower limit of @xmath03@xmath610@xmath14erg to the isotropic energy . extrapolating the power law model in the whole 1 - 10@xmath15 kev ( rest frame ) band we computed an upper limit of e@xmath161.3@xmath610@xmath17erg .
the average xrt spectrum can be modeled with an absorbed power law of @xmath18 @xmath13 and a photon index @xmath19=@xmath20 .
the fluence emitted by the afterglow in the x - ray band is @xmath03.5@xmath610@xmath12erg@xmath13 , comparable to that of the prompt emission .
the combined bat and xrt lightcurve , shown in fig.[fig : lc ] , displays many of the features seen by swift for other grbs .
the x - ray hardness ratio ( fig.[fig : lc ] ) shows a spectral evolution between the three standard phases of the afterglow emission , in particular a hardening related to the small flare peaking at @xmath0t+1500 s. from spectral and timing analysis we derived a spectral index @xmath21 of the radiating electrons of @xmath02.1 for @xmath22@xmath23@xmath24 .
due to the narrow energy band of the swift bat , it is hard to costrain low peak energy values , however the soft spectral index of the prompt emission suggest grb 051109b can be identified as a xrr burst .
the x - ray lightcurve has a well known shape : an initial fast decay in the first 200 s , interpreted as off - axis prompt emission ; a plateau , attributed to energy injection into the afterglow ; a final decay of index @xmath01 in agreement with standard afterglow models .
using our best fit model and the data reported in @xcite , corrected for extinction , we found f@xmath25@xmath03.7@xmath610@xmath26erg@xmath13s@xmath8 and a f@xmath27@xmath011 @xmath28jy at t+11 hr . we verified that grb 051109b lies well above the region of dark bursts defined in @xcite . | @xmath2-ray lightcurve grb 051109b shows single soft peak strong emission above 100 kev fig estimated duration 15350 kev band@xmath3=15@xmath41 s faint afterglow detected by - telescope @xmath086 after burst monitored 6 days burst location observed by no optical counterpart detected nearby barred spiral galaxy proposed putative host galaxy field 051109b re - observed by swift aug 2006 no late - time x - ray emission in 17 ks exposure image@xmath5 upper limit 9.8@xmath610@xmath7ctss@xmath8 time averaged spectrum emission fit by power law photon index 1.9@xmath40.3 cut off powerlaw band model improve fit fixing first index @xmath9 band upper limit to@xmath11 energy 70 kev 90% confidence level fluence in 15150 kev energy band is @xmath02.1@xmath610@xmath12erg@xmath13 0.08 lower limit @xmath03@xmath610@xmath14erg to isotropic energypower law model 1 - 10@xmath15 kev band upper limit@xmath161.3@xmath610@xmath17erg average xrt spectrum modeled absorbed power law @xmath18 photon index @xmath19=@xmath20 fluence afterglow x - ray band @xmath03.5@xmath610 comparable prompt emission combined bat xrt lightcurve displays features swift x - ray hardness ratio shows spectral evolution phases afterglow hardening small flare @xmath0t+1500 s derived spectral index @xmath21 radiating electrons @xmath02.1 @xmath22 narrow energy band swift bat hard costrain low peak energy values soft spectral index prompt emission grb 051109b xrr burst x - ray lightcurve initial fast decay first 200 s - prompt emission plateau energy injection afterglow final decay index @xmath01 afterglow models best fit model data extinction found f@xmath25@xmath03.7@xmath610@xmath26erg@xmath13s@xmath8 f@xmath27@xmath011 @xmath28jy t+11 hr verified grb 051109b above region dark bursts | 0.175978 | 917 | 492 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,881 | using cleo data collected at 3370 mev and 4170 mev , we determine @xmath0 mev and an interim preliminary value of @xmath1 mev , where both results are radiatively corrected .
they agree with the recent most precise unquenched lattice - qcd calculation for the @xmath2 , but do not for the @xmath3 .
several consequences are discussed . | leptonic decay @xmath4 is described by the annihilation of the initial quark - antiquark pair into a virtual @xmath5 that materializes as a pair ( fig .
[ diagram ] ) . .
, title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] [ diagram ] the decay rate is give by @xmath6 where @xmath7 is decay constant @xcite , related to the overlap of the heavy and light quark wave - function at zero spatial separation , @xmath8 is the fermi constant , @xmath9 is the @xmath10 mass , @xmath11 is the final state charged - lepton mass , and @xmath12 is a ckm matrix element , taken as @xmath13 and @xmath14 .
thus , measurement of purely leptonic decays allow a determination of the decay constant @xmath7 .
meson decay constants in the @xmath15 system are used to translate measurements of @xmath16 mixing to ckm matrix elements .
currently , it is not possible to determine @xmath17 accurately from leptonic @xmath15 decays , so theoretical calculations of @xmath17 are used . since the @xmath18 meson does not have @xmath19 decays
, it will never be possible to determine @xmath20 experimentally , thus theory must be relied on . if calculations disagree on @xmath21 mesons , they may be questionable on @xmath15 mesons . if , on the other hand new physics is present , we need understand how it effects sm based predictions of the @xmath15 decay constants .
decay constants can be calculated using lattice quantum - chromodynamics ( lqcd ) .
recent calculation from follana _ et al .
_ using an unquenched lqcd predicts @xmath22 mev and @xmath23 mev @xcite .
we use the reactions @xmath24 , and @xmath25 or @xmath26 .
the @xmath27 is studied at 3770 mev using 818 pb@xmath28 of data @xcite . and the @xmath3
is studied at 4170 mev , using 424 pb@xmath28 for @xmath29 and @xmath30 , @xmath31 , and 300 pb@xmath28 for @xmath30 , @xmath32 .
( eventually cleo will present results using 600 pb@xmath28 . ) [ [ section ] ] we fully reconstruct @xmath33 @xcite as a tag and examine the properties of the other @xmath2 , which can be found even if there is a missing neutrino in the final state .
this method is called as double tag " technique . to reconstruct @xmath33 tags we require that the tag candidates have a measured energy consistent with the beam energy , and have a
beam constrained mass " , @xmath34 , consistent with the @xmath33 nominal mass @xcite , where @xmath35 , @xmath36 is the beam energy and @xmath37 runs over all the final state particles three - momenta .
[ mbc_all ] shows the @xmath38 distribution summed over all the decay modes we use for tagging . selecting events in the mass peak we count 460,055@xmath39787 signal events over a background of 89,472 events .
decay candidates in the final states : @xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 and @xmath45.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] we then search for signal events with one and only one additional track with opposite sign of charge to the tag , not identified as kaon .
the track must make an angle @xmath46 with respect to the beam line ( 90% of the solid angle ) , and in addition we require that there not be any photon detected in the calorimeter with energy greater than 250 mev .
the latter selection can highly suppress @xmath47 background .
we separate these events into two cases , where case ( i ) refers to muon candidates depositing @xmath48 mev , characteristic of 98.8% of muons and case ( ii ) is for candidates depositing @xmath49 mev , characteristic of 45% of the pions , those that happen to interact in the calorimeter and deposit significant energy .
we look for @xmath50 by computing the square of the missing mass @xmath51 where @xmath52 is the three - momentum of the fully reconstructed @xmath33 , and @xmath53 is the energy ( momentum ) of the @xmath54 candidate .
the signal peaks at zero for @xmath55 and is smeared toward more positive values for @xmath56 , @xmath57 .
the fit to the case ( i ) mm@xmath58 distribution shown in fig .
[ case1-taunufix ] contains separate shapes for signal , @xmath59 , @xmath60 , @xmath56 ( @xmath61 , and a background shape describing three - body decays .
here we assume the sm ratio of 2.65 for the ratio of the @xmath62 component and constrain the area ratio of these components to the product of 2.65 with @xmath63)=(10.90@xmath390.07)% @xcite and the 55% probability that the pion deposits @xmath64300 mev in the calorimeter .
the @xmath59 background are fixed at 9.2 events obtained from monte carlo ( mc ) simulation .
the normalizations of the signal , @xmath60 , and 3-body background are allowed to float .
the @xmath60 shape is obtained from double tag events of @xmath65 where we ignore one kaon to calculate the mm@xmath58 .
all other shapes are obtained from the mc simulation . for case ( i ) .
the points with error bars show the data .
the black ( dashed ) curve centered at zero shows the signal @xmath55 events . the dot - dashed ( red ) curve that peaks around 0.05
gev@xmath58 shows the @xmath66 , @xmath67 component .
the solid ( blue ) gaussian shaped curve centered on the pion - mass squared shows the residual @xmath59 component .
the dashed ( purple ) curve that falls to zero around 0.03 gev@xmath58 is the sum of all the other background components , except the @xmath60 tail which is shown by the long - dashed ( green ) curve that peaks up at 0.25 gev@xmath58 .
the solid ( black ) curve is the sum of all the components.,scaledwidth=50.0% ] the fit yields 149.7@xmath3912.0 @xmath55 signal events and 25.8 @xmath56 , @xmath67 events ( for the entire mm@xmath58 range ) .
we also perform the fit allowing the @xmath56 , @xmath67 component to float .
then we find 153.9@xmath3913.5 @xmath55 events and 13.5@xmath3915.3 @xmath56 , @xmath67 events , compared with the 25.8 we expect in the sm . performing the fit in this manner
gives a result that is independent of the sm expectation of the @xmath66 rate .
to extract a branching fraction , in either case , we subtract off 2.4@xmath391.0 events found from simulations and other studies to be additional backgrounds , not taken into account by the fit .
we find @xmath68 the decay constant @xmath69 is then obtained from eq .
( [ eq : equ_rate ] ) using 1040@xmath397 fs as the @xmath27 lifetime @xcite and 0.2256 as @xmath70 .
our final result , including radiative corrections is @xmath71 [ [ section-1 ] ] to reconstruct the tag , the difference here than the @xmath27 case is that we need to include an additional photon from @xmath72 in the tag .
the @xmath73 tags we reconstructed can either from directly produced @xmath73 mesons or those that result from the decay of @xmath72 mesons .
we calculate the missing mass squared mm@xmath74 recoiling against the photon and the @xmath73 tag , @xmath75 here @xmath76 ( @xmath77 ) is the center - of - mass energy ( momentum ) , @xmath78 ( @xmath79 ) is the energy ( momentum ) of the fully reconstructed @xmath73 tag , and @xmath80 ( @xmath81 ) is the energy ( momentum ) of the additional photon .
we determine number of tags by simultaneously fit to the invariant mass ( @xmath82 ) and mm@xmath74 , shown in fig .
the signal is fit to a sum of two gaussians for the @xmath82 and a crystal ball function for the mm@xmath74 .
the tail parameters of the crystal ball function are obtained from fully reconstructed @xmath83 events .
the background has two components : either comes from the background under the invariant mass peak ( fake @xmath84 ) , or is due to random photon combinations .
the former background is modeled by linear function for the mass and 5th order chebyshev polynomial for the mm@xmath74 .
since the latter background is from a true @xmath84 , its mass distribution has the same shape as that from the signal , while its mm@xmath74 is modeled by another 5th order chebyshev polynomial function .
the total number of single tags is @xmath85 in the invariant mass signal region ( @xmath86 mev from the nominal @xmath84 mass ) and mm@xmath87[3.782 , 4.0 ] gev@xmath58 .
[ 2d ] $ ] gev@xmath58 and mm@xmath74 ( right ) in the invariant mass @xmath88 mev@xmath89 mev in the final states : @xmath90 , @xmath91 , @xmath92 ; @xmath93 , @xmath94 ; @xmath95 , @xmath93 , @xmath96 ; @xmath97 , @xmath98 , @xmath99 , @xmath100 ; @xmath101 , @xmath102 , @xmath103 ; @xmath93 , @xmath98 , and @xmath94 ; @xmath104 .
data ( point ) and fit function ( red curve ) are shown .
the dashed ( blue ) curve corresponds to the fake @xmath84 background , and the dashed ( green ) curve to the random photon background.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0%]$ ] gev@xmath58 and mm@xmath74 ( right ) in the invariant mass @xmath88 mev@xmath89 mev in the final states : @xmath90 , @xmath91 , @xmath92 ; @xmath93 , @xmath94 ; @xmath95 , @xmath93 , @xmath96 ; @xmath97 , @xmath98 , @xmath99 , @xmath100 ; @xmath101 , @xmath102 , @xmath103 ; @xmath93 , @xmath98 , and @xmath94 ; @xmath104 .
data ( point ) and fit function ( red curve ) are shown .
the dashed ( blue ) curve corresponds to the fake @xmath84 background , and the dashed ( green ) curve to the random photon background.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] similarly as the @xmath27 , we reconstruct the signal side .
we veto events with an extra neutral energy cluster @xmath49 mev ( it is 250 mev in the @xmath27 case ) .
it is highly effective in reducing backgrounds , especially for @xmath105 , @xmath106 and the processes @xmath107 .
the missing mass squared , mm@xmath58 , evaluated by taking into account the observed @xmath54 , @xmath73 , and photon should peak at zero ; @xmath108 we also make use of a set of kinematical constraints and fit each event to two hypotheses one of which is that the @xmath73 tag is the daughter of a @xmath109 and the other that the @xmath110 decays into @xmath111 , with the @xmath3 subsequently decaying into @xmath55 .
in addition , we constrain the invariant mass of the @xmath73 tag to the know @xmath84 mass .
this gives us a total of 7 constraints .
the missing neutrino four - vector needs to be determined , so we are left with a three - constraint fit . we perform a standard iterative fit minimizing @xmath112 .
we choose the fitted mm@xmath58 from the hypothesis giving the smaller @xmath112 .
the mm@xmath113 distribution from data is show in fig . [ mms - fitall_38 - 47 ] .
after fixing the ratio of @xmath62 to the sm value we find @xmath114 mev .
the dashed ( grey ) gaussian shaped curve peaked near zero is the @xmath55 component , while the dashed ( purple ) curve that rises sharply from zero and then flattens out shows the @xmath56 component .
the two lines are background components . the solid curve shows the sum . , scaledwidth=45.0% ] we can also use the decay mode @xmath115 .
this result has already been published .
@xcite the technique here is to use only three tagging modes : @xmath116 , @xmath117 and @xmath118 , to ensure that the tags are extremely clean
. then events with an identified @xmath119 and no other charged tracks are selected .
any energy not associated with the tag decay products is tabulated .
those events with small extra energy below 400 mev are mostly pure @xmath120 events . after correcting for efficiencies and residual backgrounds
we find @xmath121 mev .
the preliminary cleo average is @xmath122 mev ( radiatively corrected ) . averaging in the belle result @xcite @xmath123 mev , which differs from the follana _ et al .
_ calculation @xcite by 3.2 standard deviations , while the result for @xmath124 mev is in good agreement .
this discrepancy could be due to physics beyond the standard model @xcite , or systematic uncertainties that are not understood in the lqcd calculation or the experimental measurements , or unlikely statistical fluctuations in the experimental measurements or the lqcd calculation .
fits to the ckm matrix parameters use theoretical predictions of @xmath20/@xmath125 .
as similar calculations are used for @xmath20/@xmath125 , we need to be concerned with them .
i thank the u. s. national science foundation for support .
excellent conversations were had with p. chang , a. kronfeld and s. stone . | leptonic decay @xmath4 annihilation initial quark - antiquark pair into virtual @xmath5 fig. diagram decay rate @xmath6 @xmath7 decay constant @xcite related overlap heavy light quark wave function zero spatial separation @xmath8 fermi constant @xmath9 @xmath10 mass final state charged - lepton mass @xmath12 ckm matrix element @xmath13 @xmath14 leptonic decays allow decay constant @xmath7 meson decay constants @xmath15 system translate measurements @xmath16 mixing ckm matrix elements determine @xmath17 from leptonic @xmath15 decays theoretical calculations @xmath17 @xmath18 meson @xmath19 decays determine @xmath20 experimentally theory calculations disagree @xmath21 mesons questionable on @xmath15 mesons new physics predictions @xmath15 decay constants decay constants calculated lattice quantum - chromodynamics calculation follana predicts @xmath22 mev @xmath23 mev @xcite use reactions @xmath24 @xmath25 or @xmath26@xmath27 studied at 3770 mev using 818 pb@xmath28 data @xmath3 studied at 4170 mev 424 pb@xmath28 for 300 pb@xmath28 for cleo results using 600 pb@xmath28 reconstruct @xmath33 @xcite tag examine properties other @xmath2 missing neutrino double tag technique @xmath33 require tag candidates measured energy consistent with beam energy beam constrained mass @xmath34 consistent with @xmath33 nominal mass @xcite @xmath35 @xmath36 beam energy @xmath37 runs over final state particles @xmath38 distribution decay modes mass peak count 460,055@xmath39787 signal events over background 89,472 events decay candidates in final states @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 search for signal events with one additional track opposite sign of charge to tag not kaon track make angle @xmath46 beam line 90% solid angle photon detected in calorimeter with energy greater than 250 mev suppress @xmath47 backgroundseparate events into two cases i ) muon candidates depositing @xmath48 mev 98.8% muons ii ) candidates depositing @xmath49 mev 45% pions calorimeter deposit energy look for @xmath50 missing mass @xmath51 @xmath52 three - momentum @xmath33 energy @xmath54 signal peaks at zero @xmath55 smeared positive values for @xmath56 @xmath57 case i ) mm@xmath58 distribution contains shapes signal @xmath59 @xmath60 background shape three - body decays assume sm ratio 2.65 @xmath62 component constrain area ratio 2.65 @xmath63)=(10.90@xmath390.07)% @xcite 55% probability pion deposits @xmath64300 mev calorimeter @xmath59 background fixed at 9.2 events monte carlo simulation normalizations signal @xmath60 3-body background float @xmath60 shape from double tag events @xmath65 one kaon calculate mm@xmath58 other shapes from mc simulation case i ) points error bars show data black curve zero shows signal @xmath55 eventsdot - dashed red curve around 0.05 gev@xmath58 shows @xmath66 solid blue ) curve pion - mass squared shows residual @xmath59 component dashed purple curve falls to zero around 0.03 gev@xmath58 sum background components except @xmath60 tail long - dashed green curve at 0.25 gev@xmath58 solid black ) curve sum components fit yields 149.7@xmath3912.0 @xmath55 25.8 @xmath56 events@xmath58 range @xmath56 @xmath67 component float find 153.9@xmath3913.5 @xmath55 events 13.5@xmath3915.3 @xmath56 events compared with 25.8 sm result independent of sm expectation @xmath66 rate extract branching fraction subtract 2.4@xmath391.0 events simulations additional backgrounds not find @xmath68 decay constant @xmath69 obtained from eq using 1040@xmath397 fs as @xmath27 lifetime @xcite 0.2256 as @xmath70 final result radiative corrections is @xmath71 include additional photon from @xmath72 in tag@xmath73 tags reconstructed or decay calculate missing mass mm@xmath74 recoiling against photon @xmath73 tag center - of - mass energy @xmath78 reconstructed @xmath73 tag @xmath80 additional photon determine number tags to invariant mass @xmath82 and@xmath74 signal fit to two gaussians for @xmath82 crystal ball function for mm@xmath74 tail parameters crystal ball function from reconstructed @xmath83 events background two components from invariant mass peak @xmath84 or random photon combinations former background modeled by linear function mass 5th order chebyshev polynomial for mm@xmath74 latter background from true @xmath84 mass distribution same shape signal mm@xmath74 modeled by 5th order chebyshev polynomial total number of single tags @xmath85 in invariant mass signal region @xmath86 from @xmath84 mass mm@xmath87[3.782 , 4.0 ] gev@xmath582d gev@xmath58 mm@xmath74 right ) invariant mass @xmath88 mev@xmath89 mev final states @xmath90 @xmath94 @xmath104 data point ) fit function red curve ) shown dashed blue ) curve fake @xmath84 background green ) curve random photon background. gev@xmath58 mm@xmath74 right ) invariant mass @xmath88 mev@xmath89 mev final states @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath95 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath103 @xmath93 @xmath98 @xmath94 @xmath104 data point ) fit function red curve ) shown dashed blue ) curve corresponds fake @xmath84 background green ) curve random photon background similarly @xmath27 reconstruct signal side veto events extra neutral energy cluster @xmath49 mev 250 mev @xmath27 case )effective reducing backgrounds @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 missing mass squared mm@xmath58 evaluated @xmath54 @xmath73 photon peak at zero @xmath108 kinematical constraints fit event to two hypotheses @xmath73 tag daughter of @xmath109 @xmath110 decays into @xmath111 @xmath3 decaying into @xmath55 constrain invariant mass @xmath73 tag to @xmath84 mass 7 constraints missing neutrino four - vector three - constraint fit standard iterative fit minimizing @xmath112 choose fitted mm@xmath58 hypothesis smaller @xmath112 mm@xmath113 distribution data in fig . - 47 fixing ratio @xmath62 to sm value find @xmath114 mev dashed gaussian curve peaked near zero @xmath55 component curve shows @xmath56 component two lines background components solid curve shows sum scaledwidth=45.0% use decay mode @xmath115 result published technique use three tagging modes @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 tags clean events with identified @xmath119 no other charged tracks selectedenergy not associated decay products tabulated events small extra energy below 400 mev mostly pure @xmath120 events correcting efficiencies residual backgrounds @xmath121 mev preliminary cleo average @xmath122 mev radiatively corrected result @xcite @xmath123 mev differs follana calculation 3.2 standard deviations result @xmath124 mev good agreement discrepancy due to physics beyond standard model systematic uncertainties unlikely statistical fluctuations ckm matrix parameters theoretical predictions @xmath20/@xmath125 similar calculations @xmath20/@xmath125 u. s. national science foundation support conversations with p. chang. kronfeld s. stone | 0.494791 | 3,263 | 1,753 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,883 | we re - analyze the physical conditions for magneto - rotational instability ( mri ) within a steady axisymmetric stratified disk of plasma , in order to account for the so - called corotation theory ( the differential angular velocity depends on the magnetic flux surface ) .
we develop the study of linear stability around an astrophysical background configuration , following the original derivation in @xcite , but implementing the corotation condition as the orthogonality between the background magnetic field and the angular velocity gradient .
we demonstrate that a dependence on the background magnetic field direction is restored in the dispersion relation and , hence , the emergence of mri is affected too . | the existence of an alfvenic instability in weakly magnetized rotating plasmas was discovered in 1959 by e. p. velikhov @xcite and implemented on an astrophysical setting by s. chandrasekar in 1960 @xcite and it is well - known as magneto - rotational instability ( mri ) . the intrinsic nature of such unstable mode profile consists of the coupling between alfven waves and the plasma inhomogeneity , due to differential rotation ( indeed mri is suppressed in uniformly rotating systems ) .
the most intriguing feature of mri is however that it vanishes when the magnetic field has sufficiently high amplitude , because of the effect of the restoring force due to magnetic tension , which is able to stabilize the plasma shift dynamics . despite an instability driven by magnetic tension
does not transport matter , nonetheless mri is very relevant for astrophysical systems and , in particular , for accretion structures .
the shakura idea for accretion @xcite relies on the existence of an effective viscosity , emerging from the plasma turbulence and the differential rotation of the accretion profile .
actually mri turns out to be the most appropriate ( if not the only reliable ) mechanism to rise such a turbulent regime in astrophysical accreting systems @xcite ( see also @xcite , where mri was re - analyzed , after the original derivation ) .
the great impact of this issue can be easily understood when realizing that most of the space plasma are in the condition of weakly magnetized systems , especially stellar disk configurations @xcite .
this scenario has led many authors , over the years , to investigate mri in some different contexts and deepening its different morphologies , see for instance @xcite .
a rather general result has been achieved in @xcite , where a stratified and differentially rotating disk has been addressed in view of tracing the feature of mri as a general property of axially symmetric profiles .
the very surprising feature derived in this work consists of the independence of the stability conditions on the intensity and direction of the background magnetic field .
the aim of the present analysis is to demonstrate how the direction of the magnetic field is actually involved in the stability of the stratified disk , as soon as the so - called co - rotation theorem is taken into account @xcite .
such a theorem states that , for a steady , axially symmetric and purely rotating background ( exactly the adopted hypotheses in @xcite ) , the disk angular velocity depends on the magnetic flux function only : in what follows , this will be equivalently formulated as the orthogonality character of the angular velocity gradient with respect to the background magnetic field . here , we perform the linear perturbation analysis by accounting for the co - rotation profile of the background and then we demonstrate that the obtained dispersion relation takes the same form as the one in @xcite , but after the orthogonality constraint between the background magnetic field and the angular velocity gradient is imposed
. then we investigate how such a revised dispersion relation affects the stability properties of the stratified disk .
the main merit of the present study consists of re - introducing a dependence of the stable profile on the angle that the background magnetic field forms with the entropy gradient , _
i.e. _ the stability region depends on the direction of the stationary magnetic configuration .
a specifical example is considered of a stratified disk around a compact massive astrophysical object , showing how a relevant stability region exists in the inner thick part of the disk .
the basic theoretical framework of the present discussion is the ideal magneto - hydrodynamics ( mhd ) theory , as viewed in axial symmetry , _ i.e. _ reducing the dynamical problem to a two - dimensional one . in particular , in what follows , we will implement the momentum conservation equation @xmath0 and the induction equation @xmath1 where @xmath2 and @xmath3 denote the velocity and magnetic fields , respectively , while @xmath4 is the plasma mass density and @xmath5 its total pressure .
the ideal ( hydrogen - like ) plasma thermodynamics is regulated by the mass and entropy conservation equations , which read respectively @xmath6 according to the axial symmetry , in what follows we adopt standard cylindrical coordinates ( @xmath7 ) and we take both the background ( denoted by a suffix @xmath8 ) and the perturbed ( characterized by a corresponding suffix @xmath9 ) quantities as independent of the angle @xmath10 , while the former are also stationary ( independent of the time variable @xmath11 ) . more specifically , the background equilibrium is guaranteed by the simultaneous validity of the gravitostatic equilibrium and the lorentz force - free condition , _
@xmath12 where @xmath13 is the background disk angular velocity , @xmath14 the keplerian angular velocity and we adopt a compact notation for the poloidal vector radius ( _ i.e. _ @xmath15 ) .
we consider separately the force - free condition , because we regard the background field @xmath16 as the radiation one , due to the central star .
furthermore , the basic co - rotation condition must hold @xmath17 the linear perturbation theory is faced in the local approximation limit , when the wavelength of the disturbances is much less than the typical scale of variation characterizing the background , _
i.e. _ we will deal with the condition @xmath18 ( @xmath19 being the wave vector used below ) . such assumption allows to treat the background variables as parametric quantities and the fourier analysis is available .
finally , we will adopt also the so - called boussinesq approximation @xcite , which reduces the mass conservation equation to the local incompressibility of the perturbations , _ i.e. _ equation ( [ cw ] ) becomes the constraint @xmath20 , where @xmath21 denotes the poloidal perturbed velocity .
this assumption corresponds to require that the sound speed is much greater than the alfven one and therefore the plasma @xmath22-parameter is large .
the study of the perturbation dynamics does not require , as we shall see , the specification of the equation of state , relating @xmath23 and @xmath24 , since the perturbed pressure will be provided by requiring the validity of the local incompressibility during the plasma evolution .
the resulting expression for @xmath23 , for sufficiently large wavenumbers , results to be negligible in equation ( [ dw ] ) , which de facto becomes a link between @xmath25 and @xmath21 .
let us consider the case of axisymmetric perturbations , with a poloidal wave - vector @xmath26 . the basic equations from which we start are the perturbed poloidal and azimuthal components of the momentum conservation equation and of the induction equation in the linear approximation , which read @xmath27 and @xmath28 respectively . from and
the components @xmath29 and @xmath30 of the magnetic field can be written in terms of other variables and the resulting expressions can be inserted into .
an expression for the perturbed pressure @xmath23 can be given by multiplying times @xmath19 and using the mass conservation equation in the boussinesq approximation , namely @xmath31 , which must be preserved during the dynamics .
eventually , the perturbed mass density can be given from the entropy conservation equation , which written for adiabatic perturbations , in the limit when @xmath32 ( which is easy to realize accounting for the large value of @xmath33 in the local approximation scheme ) , reduces to the form @xmath34 where @xmath35 .
the dispersion relation can be given by combining the conditions one gets from and after all these manipulations and by considering the following decomposition for the wave vector : since , by virtue of the co - rotation theorem , the two vector @xmath16 and @xmath36 are orthogonal and the wavevector @xmath19 has zero azimuthal component ( the perturbations preserve axial symmetry ) , we can write @xmath37 or more explicitly @xmath38 with @xmath39 being the angle between the background magnetic field and the equatorial plane . the final dispersion relation is @xmath40 with @xmath41\nonumber\\ & \left ( c_{0r}\frac{k_z^2}{k^2 } - c_{0z}\frac{k_rk_z}{k^2 } \right)\label{b } \\
c=&\frac{12}{5}\omega_a^2\omega_0 ^ 2 \bigg[- \frac{k_z^2}{k^2}\left(\frac{\vec{\nabla}p_0\cdot \vec{c}_0}{\rho _ 0 } - \frac{(\vec{\nabla}p_0\cdot \vec{k})(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{c}_0)}{k^2\rho _ 0 } \right)+\nonumber\\ & + \left ( c_{0r}\frac{k_z^2}{k^2 } - c_{0z}\frac{k_rk_z}{k^2 } \right)\left ( \frac{\partial _ rp_0}{\rho _ 0}\frac{k_z^2}{k^2 } - \frac{\partial _
zp_0}{\rho _ 0}\frac{k_rk_z}{k^2}\right ) \bigg]\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] above , we defined the quantities @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath44 . if as in @xcite one introduces @xmath45 it can be shown that @xmath46 from which it follows that @xmath47 .
moreover , the following relation holds for the second term on the right - had side of @xmath48 similarly , using , and also the expression for @xmath49 can be simplified . collecting all these results
, we end up with the following expressions @xmath50\bigg|_{cr}\\ b=&\left[- 4\omega_a^2\omega _ 0 ^ 2\frac{k_z^2}{k^2}\right]\bigg|_{cr}\\ c=&0\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath51 means the imposition of the co - rotation theorem , _
i.e. _ the decomposition for @xmath19 .
the resulting dispersion relation formally coincides with that given by balbus in @xcite , but for the implementation of the corotation theorem .
similarly , the study of the stability can be performed as in @xcite : the stability condition can be translated into the condition that the dispersion relation does not admit solutions in the limit @xmath52 , which implies the following inequality @xmath53+n_r^2+r\,\partial_r\omega_0 ^ 2>0\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath54 the inequality above is always verified if @xmath55>0\,.\label{stab2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the imposition of the co - rotation theorem here means that the derivatives of @xmath56 must be written according to the following relations @xmath57 which come from the decomposition of the radial and vertical directions as in . therefore , the stability condition becomes @xmath58>0\,,\label{sc2}\ ] ] which can be rewritten as follows @xmath59 this relation outlines how for a given matter configuration , _
i.e. _ given @xmath60 and @xmath61 , the stability of the system depends on the direction of the magnetic field .
let us consider as an application of the previous analysis the case of a specific background morphology , describing a stratified ( thick ) accretion disk around a compact astrophysical object . according to equations ,
the background magnetic field is essentially that generated by the central object and it is here modeled by a dipole - like configuration ( a reliable approximation for many concrete astrophysical systems ) , _ i.e. _ it is determined by the function @xmath62 , where the constant @xmath63 fixes the magnetic field amplitude , and it leads to the following magnetic fields components @xmath64 the gradients of the pressure can be inferred from , by assuming @xmath65 , @xmath66 being the mass of the central object .
this assumption comes from implementing the co - rotation theorem and requiring that on the equatorial plane the angular velocity be keplerian @xcite . by investigating the consistency conditions coming from , it turns out that the matter density is the product of @xmath67 times an arbitrary function of @xmath68 , while the pressure equals the primitive of such arbitrary function modulo a constant .
we choose an exponential function , leading to the following particular configuration @xmath69 @xmath70 and @xmath71 being two integration constants .
it is easy to check that these expressions solve , as it comes by direct substitution .
the corresponding profile is characterized by an exponential decay along @xmath72 , with a decreasing decay length along the radial direction ( see figure 1 ) .
[ fig : graficodisco ] the stability condition can be shown to be already contained into , such that the stable region is solely determined by the direction of the magnetic field according to ( it is drawn in figure 1 ) .
this is clarified in figure 2 : in the stable region the angle between the magnetic field and the entropy gradient is acute , while in the unstable region it is obtuse .
this analysis outlines how the relative orientation of the magnetic field with respect to the entropy gradient is crucial for the stability of the whole system . in particular , for the considered configuration mri is suppressed close to the central object in the inner part of the stratified disk ( in correspondence to the lobes in figure 1 ) and therefore no turbulent transport can easily emerge there .
[ fig : vector ]
we developed a perturbation analysis which accounts for the validity of the corotation theorem on the background disk configuration , here translated as the orthogonality of the background magnetic field and the angular velocity gradients .
the effect of such a restriction on the dispersion relation corresponds to restore a dependence on the background magnetic field direction into the mode spectrum ( absent in @xcite ) .
such an effect is relevant only for a stratified plasma disk since , when the @xmath72-dependence is weak or removed ( like in a thin disk morphology ) , the corotation constraint is automatically satisfied : the magnetic field is mainly vertical and the angular velocity gradient is essentially radially directed .
we have seen how , in a specific sample , the restored magnetic field dependence leads to a significant modification of the mri morphology across the disk , since a threshold angle emerges .
in fact , mri can develop only when the angle between the magnetic field and the entropy gradient of the background configuration is bigger than @xmath73 . from an astrophysical point of view , the obtained result could affect the transport properties of thick stratified disks , since in some regions of the plasma profile the turbulent flow due to mri is clearly suppressed ( as elucidated in the previous section ) , together with the associated effective viscosity .
this feature is particularly enhanced far from the equatorial plane ( when also the dipole magnetic field is significantly inclined ) and for stiff radial pressure gradients , _
i.e. _ when the disk rotation deviates from the keplerian behavior @xcite . independently from the astrophysical range of applicability for the corotation theorem ( for a discussion see @xcite ) , the present study removes the surprising and , a bit unnatural , feature discussed in @xcite , about the independence of mri spectrum on the magnetic configuration , _
i.e. _ on its own trigger mechanism : actually the magnetic field direction enters the spectrum and also a forbidden spatial region for mri emerges .
this work has been developed in the framework of the cgw collaboration ( www.cgwcollaboration.it ) . | alfvenic instability in weakly magnetized rotating plasmas discovered 1959 by e. velikhov @xcite implemented by s. chandrasekar in 1960 known as magneto - rotational instability ( mri ) coupling between alfven waves plasma inhomogeneity due to differential rotation mri suppressed in uniformly rotating systems vanishes when magnetic field has high amplitude restoring force due to magnetic tension plasma shift dynamics instability magnetic tension transport matter mri relevant for astrophysical systems accretion structures shakura idea for accretion @xcite relies on effective viscosity from plasma turbulence differential rotation of accretion profile mri appropriate mechanism to turbulent regime in astrophysical accreting systems @xcite see @xcite mri re - analyzed space plasma in weakly magnetized systems especially stellar disk configurations @xcite led authors to investigate mri in different contexts morphologies @xcite general result achieved in @xcite stratified and differentially rotating disk addressed mri as general property of axially symmetric profilessurprising feature in work independence stability conditions on intensity direction background magnetic field aim present analysis direction magnetic field in stability stratified disk co - rotation theorem @xcite theorem states for steady symmetric rotating background disk angular velocity depends on magnetic flux function formulated as orthogonality character of angular velocity gradient background magnetic field perform linear perturbation analysis for co - rotation profile background demonstrate dispersion relation same form as @xcite after orthogonality constraint between background magnetic field angular velocity gradient imposed investigate revised dispersion relation affects stability properties stratified disk main merit re - dependence of stable profile on angle background magnetic field with entropy gradient stability region depends on direction stationary magnetic configuration example of stratified disk around compact massive astrophysical object relevant stability region in inner thick part disk basic theoretical framework is ideal magneto - hydrodynamics ( theory viewed in axial symmetry reducing dynamical problem to two - dimensional oneimplement momentum conservation equation @xmath0 induction equation @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 denote velocity magnetic fields @xmath4 plasma mass density @xmath5 total pressure ideal plasma thermodynamics regulated by mass entropy conservation equations @xmath6 adopt standard cylindrical coordinates @xmath7 background @xmath8 perturbed @xmath9 quantities independent of angle @xmath10 former stationary independent of time variable @xmath11 background equilibrium guaranteed by gravitostatic equilibrium lorentz force - free condition @xmath13 background disk angular velocity @xmath14 keplerian angular velocity adopt compact notation for poloidal vector radius @xmath15 consider separately force - free condition background field @xmath16 as radiation one due to central star basic co - rotation condition hold @xmath17 linear perturbation theory in local approximation limit wavelength disturbances less than typical scale variation background deal with condition @xmath18 @xmath19 wave vector background variables as parametric quantities fourier analysis availableadopt boussinesq approximation @xcite reduces mass conservation equation to local incompressibility perturbations equation ( cw constraint @xmath20 @xmath21 poloidal perturbed velocity assumption sound speed greater than alfven plasma @xmath22-parameter large study perturbation dynamics require specification equation of state @xmath23 @xmath24 perturbed pressure validity local incompressibility plasma evolution expression for @xmath23 large wavenumbers negligible in equation ( [ dw ] ) link between @xmath25 @xmath21 consider axisymmetric perturbations poloidal wave - vector @xmath26 basic equations perturbed poloidal azimuthal components of momentum conservation equation induction equation linear approximation @xmath27 and @xmath28 components @xmath29 @xmath30 magnetic field written other variables expressions inserted into expression for perturbed pressure @xmath23 multiplying times @xmath19 mass conservation equation boussinesq approximation @xmath31 preserved during dynamicsperturbed mass density from entropy conservation equation for adiabatic perturbations limit when @xmath32 large value @xmath33 reduces to @xmath34 @xmath35 dispersion relation combining conditions after manipulations considering decomposition for wave vector co - rotation theorem @xmath16 @xmath36 orthogonal wavevector @xmath19 zero azimuthal component perturbations preserve axial symmetry write @xmath37 or @xmath38 with @xmath39 angle between background magnetic field equatorial planefinal dispersion relation @xmath40 @xmath41 c_{0r}\frac{k_z^2}{k^2 } - c_{0z}\frac{k_rk_z}{k^2 } c=\frac{12}{5}\omega_a^2_0 ^ 2 \frac{k_z^2}{k^2}{{ {c}_0}{\rho _ 0 -}{k^2\rho _ 0\nonumber\\ c_{0r}\frac{k_z^2}{k^2 } - c_{0z}\frac{k_rk_z}{k^2 } \frac{\partial rp_0 0}\frac{k_z^2}{k^2 } - }\frac{k_rk_z}{k^2} defined quantities @xmath42 @xmath44 introduces @xmath45 @xmath46 follows @xmath47 relation holds second term right - side @xmath48 expression @xmath49 simplifiedresults expressions @xmath50\bigg|_{cr}\\ b=&\left[- 4\omega_a^2\omega _ 0 ^ 2\frac{k_z^2}{k^2}\right]\bigg|_{cr}\\ c=&0\,,\end{aligned} @xmath51 co - rotation theorem decomposition for @xmath19 dispersion relation coincides with balbus @xcite corotation theorem study stability @xcite stability condition dispersion relation admit solutions limit @xmath52 implies inequality @xmath53+n_r^2+r\,\partial_r\omega_0 ^ 2>0\ \end{aligned} @xmath54 inequality verified if @xmath55>0\,.\label{stab2}\end{aligned} co - rotation theorem derivatives of @xmath56 written relations @xmath57 decomposition radial vertical directions stability condition becomes @xmath58>0\,,\label{sc2}\ ] ] rewritten @xmath59 relation matter configuration @xmath60 @xmath61 stability depends on direction magnetic field analysis specific background morphology stratified accretion disk around compact astrophysical objectequations background magnetic field generated by central object modeled by dipole - like configuration for systems determined by function @xmath62 constant @xmath63 fixes magnetic field amplitude leads to magnetic fields components @xmath64 gradients of pressure inferred from assuming @xmath65 , @xmath66 mass of central object assumption from co - rotation theorem angular velocity keplerian @xcite consistency conditions matter density is product of @xmath67 times arbitrary function of @xmath68 pressure equals primitive of arbitrary function modulo constant exponential function leading to configuration @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 integration constants expressions solve direct substitution profile characterized by exponential decay along @xmath72 decreasing decay length along radial direction figure 1 ) stability condition contained into stable region determined by direction of magnetic field 1 figure 2 in stable region angle between magnetic field and entropy gradient acute unstable region obtuse relative orientation of magnetic field with entropy gradient crucial for stability system for considered configuration mri suppressed close to central object in inner part of stratified disk no turbulent transport can emergefig : vector ] developed perturbation analysis for validity corotation theorem on background disk configuration translated as orthogonality of background magnetic field angular velocity gradients effect restriction on dispersion relation dependence on background magnetic field direction into mode spectrum absent in @xcite ) effect relevant for stratified plasma disk @xmath72-dependence weak or removed thin disk morphology corotation constraint satisfied magnetic field vertical angular velocity gradient radially directed restored magnetic field dependence leads to significant modification mri morphology across disk threshold angle emerges mri can develop when angle between magnetic field and entropy gradient background configuration bigger than @xmath73 result could affect transport properties of thick stratified disks turbulent flow due to mri suppressed associated effective viscosity feature enhanced far from equatorial plane dipole magnetic field inclined for stiff radial pressure gradients when disk rotation deviates from keplerian behavior @xcite present study removes feature @xcite independence of mri spectrum on magnetic configuration trigger mechanism magnetic field direction enters spectrum forbidden spatial region for mri emerges work developed in cgw collaboration.it | 0.615988 | 3,369 | 1,751 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,888 | the cosmological solution with a long - term bouncing off time is presented .
the solution has a preceding contracting and a subsequent expanding phases and between them there exists a bouncing off phase with arbitrary time duration . | the standard cosmological model ( for review see @xcite ) gives us an accurate description of the evolution of the universe . in spite of its success ,
the standard cosmological model has a series of problems such as the initial singularity , the cosmological horizon , the flatness problem , the baryon asymmetry , and the nature of dark matter and dark energy . under the dynamical laws of general relativity ,
the standard flrw cosmology becomes singular at the origin of universe .
the matter density and geometrical invariants diverge as the volume of the universe goes to zero .
the big bang singularity seems to be an unavoidable aspect of the currently established cosmological model @xcite which probably only a full quantum theory of gravity could resolve . a bouncing universe with an initial contraction to a non - vanishing minimal radius , then subsequent an expanding phase provides a possible solution to the singularity problem of the standard big - bang cosmology .
bouncing cosmologies , in which the present era of expansion is preceded by a contracting phase , have been studied as potential alternatives to inflation in solving the problems of standard frw cosmology . the first explicit semi - analytic solution for a closed bouncing frw model filled by a massive scalar field
was found by starobinskii @xcite .
later explicit solutions for a bouncing geometry were obtained by novello and salim @xcite , and melnikov and orlov @xcite . for the review of the cosmological bounce
one can see review @xcite . in this paper
we would like to show that a universe bounce can be not only a short time event but it can be a long - term process .
in this section we will investigate a cosmological solution for a closed universe filled with a higgs scalar field .
our goal is to find a regular solution with contracting , expanding and bouncing off phases .
we start with the lagrangian @xmath0\ ] ] where @xmath1 is the 4d scalar curvature , @xmath2 is the scalar higgs field with the potentials @xmath3 .
the corresponding field equations are @xmath4 the potential @xmath3 is the mexican hat potential @xmath5 where @xmath6 and @xmath7 are constants and @xmath7 can be considered as a cosmological constant .
the energy - momentum tensor @xmath8 for the scalar field is @xmath9 for the investigation of bouncing off of universe we consider the cosmological metric @xmath10 .
\label{2 - 60}\ ] ] after the substitution of the metric into field equations we have following equations set @xmath11 , \label{2 - 70}\\ \frac{2 \ddot a}{a } + \frac{\dot a^2}{a^2 } + \frac{1}{a^2 } & = & \varkappa \left [ - \frac{\dot \phi^2}{2 } + \frac{\lambda}{4 } \left ( \phi^2 - m^2 \right)^2 - v_0 \right ] , \label{2 - 80}\\ \ddot \phi + \frac{3 \dot a \dot \phi}{a } & = & \lambda \phi \left ( m^2 - \phi^2 \right ) .
\label{2 - 90}\end{aligned}\ ] ] to begin with we would like to define the notion `` bouncing off of the universe '' .
we will say , that the universe undergo bouncing off if enough a long compression stage is replaced by enough a long stage of the expansion .
a long time interval @xmath12 means that @xmath13 or @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the life time of the universe .
why we need for such definition ?
below we will show that bouncing off can be a complicated process lasting a long enough time .
the statement of the problem :
we will investigate a long term bouncing off solutions with a point of inflection with following conditions @xmath16 here @xmath17 is the point of inflection . in the consequence of the existence of the inflection point the functions
@xmath18 can be presented in the form @xmath19 using the conditions and equations - one can find the following constraints on the initial conditions @xmath20 and the cosmological constant @xmath7 @xmath21 , \label{2 - 110}\\ \frac{2 \dot a^2_0}{a^2_0 } + \frac{2}{a^2_0 } & = & \varkappa \dot \phi^2_0 .
\label{2 - 120}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it means that the cosmological constant @xmath7 is defined uniquely @xmath22 for the numerical investigation we introduce the dimensionless time @xmath23 and dimensionless functions @xmath24 , @xmath25 . then equations - becomes @xmath26 , \label{2 - 140}\\ \frac{2 \ddot a}{a } + \frac{\dot a^2}{a^2 } + \frac{1}{a^2 } & = & \left [ - \frac{\dot \phi^2}{2 } + \frac{\lambda}{4 } \left ( \phi^2 - m^2 \right)^2 - v_0 \right ] , \label{2 - 150}\\ \ddot \phi + \frac{3 \dot a \dot \phi}{a } & = & \lambda \phi \left ( m^2 - \phi^2 \right ) \label{2 - 160}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the following initial conditions @xmath27 the numerical solutions are presented in fig s [ fg1]-[fg5 ] . in fig .
[ fg1 ] the profiles for different @xmath28 are presented . from this figure
we see that there exist the bounce with different time duration .
every such solution can be enumerated with the number of minima or maxima . on fig s [ fg1]-[fg4 ]
the profiles of @xmath29 , hubble parameter @xmath30 and the state equation @xmath31 for @xmath32 are presented .
it is useful to present the profile of a state equation ( see , fig .
[ fg4 ] ) in the form @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the pressure and @xmath35 is the energy density . we see that in the contracting and expanding stages @xmath36 and additionally in during of bouncing off stage there are points where @xmath36
. how long could be such prolonged bouncing off ?
for the investigation of this question we are addressing to fig .
we see that for @xmath37 the solution has bouncing off but for @xmath38 the solution is singular one .
it means that there exists a special solution with @xmath39 where @xmath40 . from fig .
[ fg1 ] and fig .
[ fg5 ] we see that such solution should have an infinite long bouncing off with a contracting phase at @xmath41 and an expansion phase at @xmath42 .
the most interesting is that by @xmath28 close enough to @xmath43 we may have a bouncing off time with any duration . in during of bouncing off the size of universe is @xmath44 .
it means that the existence time of universe in such state can be somehow long with possible expansion at any time .
here we have shown that the process of universe bouncing off is not a simple process .
implicitly is supposed that bouncing off happens at . here
we have shown that it can be taking place at the planck region .
it allows us to consider a quantum birth of the universe as following process : the universe exists in the state with @xmath39 and in the consequence of quantum fluctuations of @xmath28 the universe pass to the state with @xmath45 .
after that the universe go into an inflation phase . | standard cosmological model see @xcite ) accurate evolution universe success has problems initial singularity cosmological horizon flatness problem baryon asymmetry dark matter dark energy under dynamical laws relativity standard cosmology becomes singular at origin matter density geometrical invariants diverge as volume to zero big bang singularity unavoidable full quantum theory of gravity resolve bouncing universe with initial contraction to non - vanishing minimal radius expanding phase possible solution to singularity problem bouncing cosmologies expansion preceded by contracting phase studied as potential alternatives to inflation first solution for closed bouncing frw model massive scalar field found by starobinskii @xcite later solutions bouncing by novello salim @xcite melnikov and orlov @xcite review cosmological bounce see review @xcite universe bounce can be short long - term process investigate cosmological solution for closed universe higgs scalar field goal to find regular solution with contracting expanding bouncing off phases start with lagrangian @xmath0\ @xmath1 is 4d scalar curvature @xmath2 scalar higgs field potentials @xmath3 .field equations @xmath4 potential @xmath3 mexican hat potential @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 constants @xmath7 cosmological constant energy - momentum tensor @xmath8 scalar field @xmath9 bouncing off universe cosmological metric @xmath10{2 - 60} substitution metric into field equations equations @xmath11{2 - 70}\\ \frac{2 a{a } +{^2}{a^2 }\frac{1}{a^2 }{ \phi^2}{2 } +{\lambda}{4 }\phi^2 - m^2 -_0{2 - 80}\\ \phi + \frac{3 \phi}{a }\lambda \phi m^2 - \phi^2 \right{2 - 90}{aligned} define bouncing off universe universe bouncing off if long compression stage replaced long stage expansion long time interval @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 life time universe bouncing off complicated process long timeproblem investigate long term solutions point inflection conditions @xmath16 @xmath17 point inflection functions @xmath18 presented @xmath19 conditions equations constraints initial conditions @xmath20 cosmological constant @xmath7 @xmath21{2 - 110}\\ \frac{2 a^2{a^2 } +\frac{2}{a^2_0\phi^2_0{2 - 120}{aligned} cosmological constant @xmath7 defined uniquely @xmath22 dimensionless time @xmath23 dimensionless functions @xmath24 @xmath25 equations @xmath26{2 - 140}\\ \frac{2 a}{a } +{ a^2}{a^2 }\frac{1}{a^2 } ^2}{2 }{\lambda}{4 }^2 - m^2 -_0{2 - 150}\\ \phi + \frac{3 \phi}{a }^2 - \phi^2 {2 - 160}{aligned} initial conditions @xmath27 numerical solutions presented fig s fg1]-[fg5fg1 ] profiles @xmath28 presented bounce different time duration solution enumerated with minima or maxima fig s [ fg1]-[fg4 ] profiles of @xmath29 hubble parameter @xmath30 state equation @xmath31 for @xmath32 presented present profile state equation fig . [ fg4 ] in form @xmath33 @xmath34 pressure @xmath35 energy density contracting expanding stages @xmath36 bouncing off stage points where @xmath36 how long prolonged bouncing off ? investigation addressing fig . @xmath37 solution has bouncing off @xmath38 solution singular special solution with @xmath39 @xmath40 fig . fg1 fg5 ] solution infinite long bouncing off contracting phase at @xmath41 expansion phase at @xmath42 @xmath28 close to @xmath43 bouncing off time any duration bouncing off size universe is @xmath44 existence time universe long possible expansion any time process universe bouncing off not simple bouncing off happens planck region quantum birth universe exists in state with @xmath39 quantum fluctuations of @xmath28 pass to state with @xmath45 universe into inflation phase. | 0.306481 | 1,708 | 903 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,890 | a compact expression for the dewitt - schwinger renormalization terms suitable for use in even - dimensional space - times is derived
. this formula should be useful for calculations of @xmath0 and @xmath1 in even dimensions . | a major impediment to using semi - classical general relativity is calculating the renormalized expectation value of the stress tensor .
properly renormalized values for @xmath2 and @xmath3 provide information on particle production and spontaneous symmetry breaking , and are also required to calculate backreaction . since in general relativity energy density is itself a source of curvature , great care must be taken in deciding what may be dismissed as ` unphysical ' .
fortunately , there are several generally accepted renormalization schemes for curved space - times @xcite . our purpose is to present a compact formula for the renormalization terms that may be applied to @xmath2 and @xmath3 calculations in arbitrary black hole space - times of even dimension .
calculating @xmath3 for a general d - dimensional black hole space - time is difficult . for a scalar field , @xmath4 and its derivatives ,
so we start with the simpler problem of calculating @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the hartle - hawking vacuum .
note that @xmath2 is the coincidence limit of the two point function @xmath7 , and so may be expressed in terms of green s functions . in particular , the feynman green s function is related to the time ordered propagator , @xmath8 .
a wick rotation allows us to work in euclidean space where @xmath9 .
the euclidean green s function , @xmath10 , now obeys @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the laplace - beltrami operator in @xmath13-dimensional curved euclidean space . to solve for @xmath10 , start with the euclidean metric for a static space - time in @xmath13 dimensions with line element
@xmath14 here @xmath15 is the euclidean time , @xmath16 , @xmath17 is a radial coordinate , and @xmath18 represents a @xmath19-dimensional angular space .
the only restriction for this method is that the metric must be diagonal .
if the scalar field is at temperature @xmath20 , then the green s function is periodic in @xmath21 with period @xmath22 . assuming a separation of variables , standard green s function techniques lead to the formal solution @xmath23 where @xmath24 , and @xmath25 are eigenfunctions of the helmholtz equation obtained from the from the angular part of eq .
( [ eq : green ] ) . for black holes with spherical topology
these are equivalent to the set of hyperspherical harmonics .
the radial function @xmath26 obeys a complicated differential equation obtained by putting the above expression into eq .
( [ eq : green ] ) .
this expression is divergent in the sum over @xmath27 .
the @xmath28 computation has been reduced to computating the coincidence limit of the green s function a divergent quantity . to assign physical meaning to @xmath2 it
must be rendered finite via some renormalization process , and the standard approach is to renormalize the expression for @xmath29 via christensen s point splitting method applied to the dewitt - schwinger expansion of the propagator @xcite . in @xmath13 dimensions ,
the adiabatic dewitt - schwinger expansion of the euclidean propagator is @xcite @xmath30 equation ( [ eq : schwingdewitt ] ) introduces several new variables .
let @xmath31 be the geodesic distance between @xmath32 and @xmath33 , then define @xmath34 and @xmath35 .
the @xmath36 are called dewitt coefficients , and @xmath37 is a hankel function of the second kind .
lastly , @xmath38 is the van vleck
morette determinant , where @xmath39 and @xmath40 . using the derivative properties of bessel functions , noting that @xmath41 is purely imaginary in euclidean space , and defining @xmath42 , eq .
( [ eq : schwingdewitt ] ) can be written as latexmath:[\[\label{eq : sdwintermediate } g_{\rm e}^{\rm ds}({x},{x ' } ) = \frac{-2i \triangle^{1/2}}{(4\pi)^{d/2 } } \sum_{k= 0 } a_k({x},{x'})(2m^2)^{\nu } the dewitt - schwinger expansion is a wkb expansion of the euclidean propagator for a generic space - time when the point separation is small . for a particular space - time
, this procedure does not give the correct results for the green s function with finite point separation because it ignores global space - time properties that determine the green s function such as the effective potential around a black hole
but it should reproduce the same divergent terms in the coincidence limit . therefore ,
if the divergent terms of the dewitt - schwinger expansion can be isolated , then subtracting these terms from @xmath29 will make it finite as @xmath44 .
since we are working in euclideanized space the physical renormalization terms come from the real part of eq .
( [ eq : sdwintermediate ] ) .
the asymptotic behavior of @xmath45 as @xmath46 implies that only terms with @xmath47 contribute divergences in the coincidence limit , so @xmath48 to renormalize @xmath10 , eq .
( [ eq : gdivterms ] ) must be made commensurate with eq .
( [ eq : greenfuncnonzerotemp ] ) .
we have shown @xcite that an integral representation of @xmath49 for small @xmath50 and integer - valued @xmath51 is @xmath52 changing of variables and using the plana sum formula to convert the integral to a sum , the renormalization terms for the @xmath13-dimensional space - time of eq .
( [ eq : metric ] ) are @xcite @xmath53\kappa\sqrt{\pi}}{(-f)^{\nu } \gamma(\nu+\frac{1}{2 } ) } \bigg[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\cos(\kappa\varepsilon n ) \left(\kappa^2n^2+m^2f\right)^{\nu-\frac{1}{2 } } - \frac{1}{2}(\kappa^2+m^2f)^{\nu-\frac{1}{2 } } \\ - i\int_0^{\infty } \frac{dt}{e^{2\pi t}-1}\left\{\left[(1+it)^2\kappa^2+m^2f\right]^{\nu-1/2 } - \left[(1-it)^2\kappa^2+m^2f\right]^{\nu-1/2 } \right\ } \\ + ( m^2f)^{\nu-\frac{1}{2}}\phantom{}_2f_1 \left(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}-\nu,\frac{3}{2},-\frac{\kappa^2}{m^2f}\right ) \bigg]+ [ a_k]e_{\nu } + \sum_{n=1}^{\nu}\sum_{p=1}^{2n}\sum_{j=0}^{p } \frac{2^{2n-1}(-m^2)^{\nu - n}\gamma(n)}{\gamma(\nu - n+1 ) } \frac{a^j_k\delta^{1/2}_{p - j}}{(\sigma^{\rho}\sigma_{\rho})^n } \bigg\}\end{gathered}\ ] ] for a scalar field at nonzero temperature @xmath54 . in this expression the @xmath55
are terms depending on the metric function @xmath56 and have been tabulated elsewhere @xcite , while @xmath57 and @xmath58 represent the @xmath59 term in an expansion in powers of @xmath60 .
this expression generalizes previously known four - dimensional results @xcite .
the corresponding renormalization terms for a scalar field at zero temperature @xmath61 are similarly found @xcite .
semi - classical general relativity requires calculation of @xmath62 in complicated possibly higher dimensional space - times .
the first step in calculating @xmath62 for a scalar field is calculating @xmath63 .
we have presented a compact expression for the renormalization terms for @xmath28 in even dimensional , static , black hole space - times .
this work partially funded by fct , through project no . cern / fp/109276/2009 | impediment - classical relativity calculating renormalized stress tensor renormalized values for @xmath2 @xmath3 provide information particle production symmetry breaking calculate backreaction energy density curvature care deciding unphysical accepted renormalization schemes for curved space - times present compact formula for renormalization @xmath2 @xmath3 calculations arbitrary black hole space - times even dimension calculating @xmath3 d - dimensional black hole space - time difficult scalar field start calculating @xmath5 @xmath6 hartle - hawking vacuum @xmath2 coincidence limit of two point function @xmath7 expressed in green s functions feynman green s function related to time ordered propagator @xmath8 wick rotation euclidean space green s function obeys @xmath11 @xmath12 laplace - beltrami operator @xmath13-dimensional curved euclidean space solve @xmath10 start with euclidean metric for static space - time in @xmath13 dimensions with line element @xmath14 euclidean time radial coordinate-dimensional angular space restriction metric must be diagonalscalar field at temperature @xmath20 green s function periodic @xmath21 @xmath22 separation variables green s function techniques formal solution @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 eigenfunctions helmholtz equation angular part eq black holes spherical equivalent hyperspherical harmonics radial function @xmath26 complicated differential equation expression into eq expression divergent sum over @xmath27 @xmath28 computation coincidence limit green s function divergent quantity physical meaning @xmath2 finite renormalization process renormalize expression @xmath29 christensen s point splitting method dewitt - schwinger expansion propagator @xcite @xmath13 dimensions adiabatic dewitt - schwinger expansion @xcite @xmath30 equation introduces new variables @xmath31 geodesic distance between @xmath32 @xmath33 define @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 dewitt coefficients @xmath37 hankel function @xmath38 van vleck morette determinant @xmath39 @xmath40 bessel functions @xmath41 imaginary in euclidean space @xmath42eq schwingdewitt written as latexmath sdwintermediate({x = \frac{-2i \triangle{1/2}}\pi{d/2\sum{k= 0({x},{x'})(2m^2) dewitt - schwinger expansion euclidean propagator generic space - time point separation small results green s function finite point separation ignores space - time properties black hole reproduce divergent terms coincidence limit divergent terms isolated subtracting terms from @xmath29 finite as @xmath44 euclideanized space physical renormalization terms from real part of eq sdwintermediate asymptotic behavior of @xmath45 @xmath46 implies terms with @xmath47 contribute divergences coincidence limit @xmath48 renormalize @xmath10 gdivterms commensurate with eq . greenfuncnonzerotemp shown integral representation of @xmath49 for small @xmath50 integer - valued @xmath51 is @xmath52 changing variables plana sum formula convert integral to sum renormalization terms for @xmath13-dimensional space - time of eqeq metric @xcite @xmath53\kappa\sqrt{\nu\gamma+\frac{1}{2\sum{n=1}\infty}\kappa\varepsilon\left(\kappa^2n^2+m^2f\right-\frac{1}{2\frac{1}{2}\kappa^2+m^2f{1{2\infty\frac{dt}{2\pi}-1}\left^2\kappa^2+m^2f\right-1/2\kappa^2+m^2f\right-1/2 m^2f-\frac{1}{2}}\phantom{_2f_1\left(\frac{1}{2}{3}{2\kappa^2}{m^2f}\right\bigg\nu\sum_{n=1}{p=1}{2n}\sum{j=0}\frac{2^{2n-1}-m^2)\nu - n\gamma n+1\frac{a_k\delta{1/2}{p - j}}\sigma\rho}}\bigg\end{gathered scalar field nonzero temperaturexmath54 @xmath55 metric function @xmath56 tabulated @xcite represent @xmath59 expansion @xmath60 generalizes four - dimensional results @xcite renormalization terms scalar field zero temperature found @xcite semi - classical relativity requires calculation @xmath62 higher dimensional space - times first step calculating scalar @xmath63 compact expression renormalization terms @xmath28 even dimensional static black hole space - times funded fct project cern fp/109276/2009 | 0.308018 | 1,874 | 1,028 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,891 | the double chooz reactor neutrino experiment will be the next detector to search for a non vanishing @xmath0 mixing angle with unprecedented sensitivity , which might open the way to unveiling cp violation in the leptonic sector .
the measurement of this angle will be based on a precise comparison of the antineutrino spectrum at two identical detectors located at different distances from the chooz nuclear reactor cores in france .
double chooz is particularly attractive because of its capability to measure @xmath1 to 3@xmath2 significance if @xmath1 @xmath3 0.05 or to exclude @xmath1 down to 0.03 at 90% c.l . for @xmath4m@xmath5 = 2.5 @xmath6 10@xmath7 ev@xmath5 in three years of data taking with both detectors .
the installation of the far detector started in may 2008 and the first neutrino results are expected in 2009 .
the advantages of reactor neutrino experiments to measure the @xmath0 mixing angle are described in this article and in particular , the design , current status and expected performance of the double chooz detector . | the neutrino oscillation phenomenon has been clearly established by the study of solar , atmospheric , reactor and beam neutrinos .
the pmns mixing matrix relates the three neutrino mass eigenstates to the three neutrino flavor eigenstates .
this can be parametrized by three mixing angles ( @xmath8 , @xmath0 , @xmath9 ) and one cp violating phase @xmath10 ( if neutrinos are dirac particles ) . during the last years
, tremendous progress has been achieved in the experimental field trying to measure the values of @xmath11 and the two squared mass differences @xmath12 which govern the oscillation probabilities .
the two mass differences and the @xmath8 and @xmath9 mixing angles have been measured with good precision @xcite . however ,
the @xmath0 angle , the sign of @xmath13 ( mass hierarchy ) and the @xmath10 phase are still unknown . in particular , only an upper limit on the value of @xmath0 has been established indicating that the angle is very small compared to the other mixing angles .
a three - flavor global analysis of the existing data provides a constraint on @xmath0 being @xmath14 @xmath15 0.028 at 90% c.l @xcite .
this limit is essentially dominated by the result obtained by the chooz reactor experiment @xcite in france .
this experiment measured the fraction of @xmath16 s surviving at a distance of 1.05 km from the reactor cores to be r = 1.01 @xmath17 2.8% ( stat ) @xmath17 2.7% ( syst ) .
this result was mainly limited by the systematic uncertainties induced by the imperfect knowledge of the neutrino production and interaction .
the measurement of this angle is of fundamental interest not only for the final understanding of neutrino oscillations but because it determines the possibilities to observe cp violation in the leptonic sector with the forthcoming neutrino experiments .
the information on the @xmath0 mixing angle can be essentially obtained from accelerator or nuclear reactor neutrino experiments .
the long baseline accelerator experiments measure the appearance of @xmath18 s in a @xmath19 beam generated at long distance from the detector .
the @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath18 transition depends on several oscillation parameters like the cp phase and the sign of @xmath13 .
moreover , they can also be sensitive to matter effects due to the long baselines .
therefore , the measurement of @xmath0 will be affected by correlations and degeneracies between parameters and the sensitivity of the accelerator experiments to this parameter will be reduced . on the other hand ,
reactor experiments are unique to provide an unambiguous determination of @xmath0 .
nuclear reactors are very intense sources of @xmath16 s coming from the @xmath21-decay of the neutron - rich fission fragments of fuel elements ( u and pu ) .
reactor neutrino experiments will look for the disappearance of @xmath16 s with energies extending up to 10 mev over distances of the order of kilometers ( short baselines ) to maximize the disappearance probability . due to the low energy of the emitted electron antineutrinos
, only disappearance measurements can be performed .
the survival probability of @xmath16 s emitted by a nuclear power station can be written as : @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the neutrino energy and @xmath24 the distance from the source to the detector .
only the first term is relevant for short baselines and therefore the oscillation amplitude is proportional to @xmath14 and independent of the cp phase and the mass hierarchy .
a clean measurement of @xmath0 can be performed with reactor neutrino experiments since they do not suffer , unlike accelerator experiments , from degeneracies and correlations between different oscillation parameters .
since they are short baseline experiments , they are not affected by matter effects .
reactor antineutrinos are detected through the inverse beta decay @xmath16 + p @xmath20 n + @xmath25 .
the energy threshold for this reaction is 1.806 mev .
the signature of the neutrino interaction is the coincidence of the photons from the prompt signal due to the @xmath25 annihilation and the delayed signal ( @xmath4 t @xmath26 30 @xmath27s ) from the neutron capture .
many liquid scintillator @xmath28 experiments use scintillator loaded with gadolinium in their fiducial volume because of its large neutron capture cross section and high total @xmath29 yield of 7 - 8 mev . the neutrino spectrum results from the convolution of the neutrino flux and the cross section .
the spectrum peaks at @xmath26 4 mev .
reactor experiments will look for a suppression of the @xmath16 rate and a distortion of the spectrum shape due to oscillations .
the signature of a neutrino interaction can be mimicked by two kind of background events : accidentals and correlated .
the accidental background corresponds to the coincidence of a positron - like signal coming from natural radioactivity of the surrounding environment or of the detector materials , with a neutron induced by cosmic muon spallation in the surrounding rock and captured in the detector .
the correlated background are events that mimic both parts of the coincidence signal .
they come from fast neutrons produced by cosmic muons , which can produce proton - recoils in the target scintillator ( misidentified as e@xmath30 ) and then are captured after thermalisation or from the @xmath21 - n decay of long - lived cosmogenic radioisotopes ( @xmath31li , @xmath32he ) produced by muon interactions in the scintillator .
some of the largest systematic uncertainties of the chooz reactor experiment are related to the accuracy to which the original neutrino flux and spectrum are known . in order to improve the chooz sensitivity to the @xmath0 mixing angle ,
a relative comparison between two or more identical detectors located at different distances from the power plant is required .
the first one , which is located at few hundred meters from the nuclear cores , monitors the neutrino flux and spectrum before neutrinos oscillate .
the second detector located 1 - 2 km away from the cores searches for a departure from the overall 1/l@xmath5 behavior of the neutrino energy spectrum . at the same time , the statistical error can also be reduced by increasing the exposure and the fiducial volume of the detector .
moreover , backgrounds can be further reduced with a better detector design , using veto detectors and external shields against muons and external radioactivity .
several nuclear reactor neutrino experiments are foreseen to measure the @xmath0 mixing angle : double chooz @xcite in france , daya bay @xcite in china , reno @xcite in south korea and angra @xcite in brazil . in the next section
the first of these experiments is explained in detail .
the double chooz experiment @xcite will improve our knowledge on the @xmath0 mixing angle within a competitive time scale and for a modest cost .
the double chooz collaboration is composed by institutes of brazil , france , germany , japan , russia , spain , uk and usa . the experiment is being installed in the chooz - b nuclear power plant in the northeast of france . the maximum operating thermal power of the two cores is 8.54 gw@xmath33 .
the far detector is located at 1050 meters from the cores in the same laboratory used by the chooz experiment ( see fig . [ chooz ] ) .
it provides a quickly prepared and well - shielded ( 300 meters of water equivalent ( m.w.e . ) ) site with near - maximal oscillation effect . a second identical detector ( near detector )
will be installed at 400 m away from the reactor cores to cancel the lack of knowledge of the neutrino spectrum and reduce the systematic errors related to the detector . for the near site
, a tunnel will be excavated under a small natural hill ( overburden 115 m.w.e . ) and a near lab will be equipped .
location of the two double chooz detectors in the chooz - b nuclear power plant.,width=321 ] in addition to the neutrino oscillation studies , double chooz aims to study the possibility of using this kind of detector to verify the non - proliferation of nuclear weapons in the framework of the international atomic energy agency missions .
a near detector could be able to provide a precise measurement of the reactor power and isotopic composition by looking at the energy spectrum and rate of the emitted antineutrinos , following its evolution with time .
the chooz detector design can also be optimized in order to reduce backgrounds .
the double chooz detectors ( see fig . [ detector ] ) consist of concentric cylinders and an outer plastic scintillator muon veto .
the innermost volume ( `` target '' ) contains about 10 tons of gd - loaded liquid scintillator ( @xmath260.1% gd ) within a transparent acrylic vessel
. this will be the volume for neutrino interactions .
it is surrounded by a 55 cm thick layer of unloaded scintillator ( `` @xmath29-catcher '' ) contained in a second acrylic vessel .
this scintillating volume is necessary to fully contain the energy deposition of gamma rays from the neutron capture on gd as well as the positron annihilation gamma rays inside the central region .
it also improves the rejection of the fast neutron background .
surrounding the @xmath29-catcher , a 105 cm thick region contains non - scintillating oil inside a stainless steel `` buffer '' vessel .
this volume reduces by two orders of magnitude with respect to chooz the level of accidental backgrounds coming mainly from the radioactivity of the photomultiplier tubes ( pmts ) .
390 10 pmts are installed on the inner wall and lids of the tank to collect the light from the central scintillating volumes , providing about 13% photocathode coverage .
the central detector is encapsulated within a `` inner muon veto '' shield , 50 cm thick , filled with scintillating organic liquid and instrumented with 78 8 pmts .
it allows the identification of muons passing near the active detector that can create spallation neutrons and backgrounds coming from outside . because of space constraint , the 70 cm sand shielding of chooz
is replaced by a 15 cm iron layer to protect the detector from rock radioactivity and to increase the target volume .
an `` outer muon veto '' covers the top of the main system and provides additional rejection power for cosmic - induced events .
it can be used for constant mutual efficiency monitoring with the inner veto .
the double chooz detector design.,width=321 ] the near and far detectors will be identical inside the pmt support structure , allowing a relative normalization error of 0.6% or less , to be compared with the 2.7% systematic error of the chooz experiment .
figure [ farlab ] shows a view of the far detector inside the experimental hall .
calibration systems will be deployed periodically into the target and @xmath29-catcher allowing to check the stability of the system .
the deployment of radioactive sources must be performed in a clean environment under a dry nitrogen atmosphere .
a glove box interface with an associated clean room will be installed on the top of the detector .
the electronic racks will be located at the end of the lab .
the double chooz far detector in the experimental hall.,width=302 ] an intense r&d effort has been carried out by the double chooz collaboration to validate the robustness of the detector concept and the feasibility of the sensitivity goals .
some examples of the activities performed are : * the construction and operation of a 1:5 scale prototype allowed us to validate the technical choices for the vessels construction and integration of the components , check the material compatibility with the scintillator , study the liquid scintillation performances and filling system , the calibration techniques , safety and all the instrumentation needed to operate such a detector .
* production and tests of stable high - quality gd - loaded scintillator , critical for the performance of the experiment .
the long - term stability , optical transmission properties , light yield , transparency and radiopurity have been tested for several years . *
magnetic measurements of the performance of the 10 pmts inside a controlled magnetic environment and design and optimization of individual pmt magnetic shields . *
development of 8-bit flash adcs waveform digitizers for the readout of each pmt signal , recording the pulse shape for possible offline particle identification studies .
many systematic uncertainties that affected chooz and all previous single - baseline reactor neutrino experiments are greatly reduced by having both near and far detectors .
table [ sys ] summarizes the systematic uncertainties in the measurement of the antineutrino flux comparing both chooz and double chooz detectors .
.systematic uncertainties in chooz and double chooz reactor experiments . [ cols="<,^,^",options="header " , ] the veto systems are also in production .
the encapsulation process of the inner veto pmts is on going .
a prototype of the outer veto system is in construction .
a complete calibration program has been designed including the deployment of gamma and neutron radioactive sources in the different liquids of the detector with different systems depending on the volume to be accessed ( guide tubes , articulated arm , fish - line , etc . ) and light flashers ( leds and lasers ) to measure the pmts .
all these systems are in construction
. the far detector integration will be finished by summer 2009 .
the near lab site will be available at the beginning of 2010 to accommodate the second detector . in 2011 , both near and far detectors , will be operative and taking data for three more years in order to achieve double chooz expectations .
double chooz is the first reactor neutrino experiment of a new generation using two identical detectors at different distances to measure the still unknown @xmath0 mixing angle .
double chooz has already started its installation and it is expected to start taking data with the far detector in 2009 and with both near and far detectors in 2011 .
double chooz will be able to measure @xmath1 to 3@xmath2 if @xmath1 @xmath3 0.05 .
otherwise , it will exclude the mixing angle down to @xmath1 @xmath3 0.03 at 90% c.l .
after three years of operation with both detectors in case of no oscillation were observed .
this will represent an improvement of about a factor 7 compared to the chooz limit and will open the way for a new level of accuracy in reactor neutrino experiments .
the information gained with double chooz will complement future results with accelerator experiments , affected by degeneracy problems , helping to better constrain the last undetermined mixing parameters . | neutrino oscillation established by solar atmospheric reactor beam neutrinos pmns mixing matrix relates three neutrino mass eigenstates to flavor eigenstates parametrized by three mixing angles one cp violating phase @xmath10 if particles progress achieved in values @xmath11 mass differences @xmath12 oscillation probabilities mass differences @xmath8 @xmath9 mixing angles measured with precision @xmath0 angle @xmath13 @xmath10 phase unknown upper limit on value @xmath0 established angle small compared to three - flavor global analysis constraint on @xmath0 @xmath14 @xmath15 0.028 at 90% c.l @xcite limit dominated by result chooz reactor experiment measured fraction of @xmath16 s surviving at 1.05 km from reactor cores r = 1.01 @xmath17 2.8% ( stat ) @xmath17 2.7% ( syst ) result limited by systematic uncertainties imperfect knowledge neutrino production interaction measurement of angle for understanding neutrino oscillations possibilities cp violation in leptonic sectorinformation @xmath0 mixing angle from accelerator neutrino experiments long baseline accelerator experiments measure appearance @xmath18 s in @xmath19 beam long distance from detector @xmath19 transition depends on oscillation parameters cp phase sign @xmath13 sensitive to matter effects long baselines measurement @xmath0 affected by correlations degeneracies accelerator experiments reactor experiments unambiguous determination of @xmath0 nuclear reactors intense sources of @xmath16 s from @xmath21-decay neutron - rich fission fragments reactor neutrino experiments disappearance @xmath16 s energies up to 10 mev over kilometers low energy electron antineutrinos only disappearance measurements survival probability of @xmath16 s nuclear written as @xmath22 @xmath23 neutrino energy @xmath24 distance from source to detector first term relevant for short baselines oscillation amplitude proportional to @xmath14 independent of cp phase mass hierarchy clean measurement of @xmath0 with reactor neutrino experiments from degeneracies correlations between oscillation parameters not affected by matter effectsreactor antineutrinos detected inverse beta decay @xmath16 + n + energy threshold 1.806 mev signature neutrino interaction coincidence photons from prompt signal annihilation delayed signal 30 neutron capture liquid scintillator @xmath28 experiments use scintillator loaded gadolinium large neutron capture cross section high @xmath29 yield 7 - 8 mev neutrino spectrum results from convolution flux cross section peaks at @xmath26 4 mev experiments suppression @xmath16 rate distortion spectrum shape due oscillations signature neutrino interaction mimicked by background events accidentals correlated accidental background coincidence positron - like signal from natural radioactivity detector materials neutron induced cosmic muon spallation captured detector correlated background mimic parts coincidence signal fast neutrons cosmic muons produce proton - recoils scintillator captured after thermalisation @xmath21 - n decay of long - lived cosmogenic radioisotopes @xmath31li muon interactions scintillator systematic uncertainties reactor experiment original neutrino flux spectrumimprove chooz sensitivity @xmath0 mixing angle comparison between two detectors different distances from power plant required first meters from cores monitors neutrino flux spectrum before second detector 1 - 2 km away from cores searches departure from 1/l@xmath5 behavior neutrino energy spectrum statistical error reduced increasing exposure fiducial volume detector backgrounds reduced better detector design veto detectors external against muons radioactivity several nuclear reactor neutrino experiments foreseen measure @xmath0 mixing angle double chooz @xcite daya bay reno south korea angra @xcite brazil first double chooz experiment @xcite knowledge @xmath0 mixing angle competitive time modest cost chooz collaboration institutes brazil france germany japan russia spain uk usa experiment installed in chooz - b nuclear power plant northeast france maximum thermal power two cores 8.54 gw@xmath33 far detector 1050 meters from cores same laboratory chooz experiment provides quickly prepared well - shielded site near - maximal oscillation effectsecond detector installed at 400 m from reactor cores to cancel knowledge neutrino spectrum reduce errors tunnel excavated under small hill near lab equipped location two double chooz detectors in chooz - b nuclear power plant studies double chooz aims study verify non - proliferation of nuclear weapons international atomic energy agency missions near detector precise measurement reactor power isotopic composition energy spectrum rate emitted antineutrinos evolution chooz detector design optimized to reduce backgrounds double chooz detectors consist concentric cylinders outer plastic scintillator innermost volume contains 10 tons of gd - loaded liquid scintillator @xmath260.1% transparent acrylic vessel for neutrino interactions surrounded by 55 cm thick layer of unloaded scintillator @xmath29-catcher in second acrylic vessel volume contain energy deposition of gamma rays neutron capture positron annihilation gamma rays improves rejection of fast neutron background surrounding-catcher 105 cm thick region contains non - scintillating oil inside stainless steel buffer vesselvolume reduces two orders chooz accidental backgrounds from radioactivity photomultiplier tubes pmts 390 10 pmts installed on inner wall lids tank collect light from central scintillating volumes 13% photocathode coverage central detector inner muon veto shield 50 cm thick filled with scintillating organic liquid instrumented with 78 8 pmts allows identification of muons near spallation neutrons backgrounds 70 cm sand shielding replaced by 15 cm iron layer rock radioactivity increase target volume outer muon veto covers top main system provides additional rejection power for cosmic - induced events used for mutual efficiency monitoring inner veto double chooz detector design near far detectors identical pmt support structure normalization error 0.6% less compared with 2.7% error chooz experiment far detector calibration systems deployed periodically stability deployment in clean environment dry nitrogen atmosphere glove box interface clean room installed on top detector electronic racks end lab double chooz far detector in experimental hall intense r&d effort double chooz collaboration robustness detector concept feasibility sensitivity goalsexamples activities performed construction operation of 1:5 scale prototype technical choices for vessels construction integration components material compatibility with scintillator liquid scintillation performances filling system calibration techniques safety instrumentation production tests of stable high - quality gd - loaded scintillator critical for performance experiment long - term stability optical transmission properties light yield transparency radiopurity tested years magnetic measurements 10 pmts controlled magnetic environment design optimization of pmt magnetic shields development of 8-bit flash adcs waveform digitizers for readout pmt signal recording pulse shape for offline particle identification studies systematic uncertainties reactor neutrino experiments reduced by near far detectors table summarizes systematic uncertainties in measurement antineutrino flux comparing chooz double chooz detectors veto systems in production encapsulation process of inner veto pmts prototype outer veto system in construction complete calibration program designed gamma neutron radioactive sources in different liquids different systems light flashers to measure pmts systems in construction far detector integration finished by summer 2009near lab site available 2010 second detector 2011 near far detectors operative taking data three years double chooz expectations first reactor neutrino experiment new generation two detectors distances unknown @xmath0 mixing angle double chooz started installation expected start taking data far detector 2009 near far detectors 2011 measure @xmath1 to 3@xmath2 if @xmath1 @xmath3 0.05 otherwise mixing angle to @xmath1 @xmath3 0.03 at 90% c.l after three years operation no oscillation improvement factor 7 chooz limit new level accuracy reactor neutrino experiments information double chooz future results accelerator experiments degeneracy problems constrain undetermined mixing parameters | 0.509671 | 3,157 | 1,577 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,898 | we study the quantization of a model proposed by newton to explain centripetal force namely , that of a particle moving on a regular polygon .
the exact eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are obtained .
the quantum mechanics of a particle moving on a circle and in an infinite potential well are derived as limiting cases . 2 | the model of a particle bouncing off a circular constraint on a polygonal path was originally devised by newton to motivate the concept of centripetal force@xcite associated with circular motion of the particle .
it serves the precise purpose of highlighting the notion of a force continuously operating on the particle on a circle as the limiting case of motion on an inscribed polygon with the corners acting as force centers .
however , the intuitive simplicity of the circle case has contributed to the consistent ignoring of newton s original model .
recently the problem has received some attention @xcite mostly from the historical perspective .
no quantum mechanical treatment of the problem is available in the literature .
the quantum mechanics of the polygon model will be of much pedagogical value for introductory courses in quantum theory inasmuch as it is an illustration of the fact that the symmetry ( the n - fold discrete rotational symmetry in the present case ) of a problem is fully reflected in the wavefunction . in this work
we first reduce the lagrangian for the system by using the constraint equation and then use a suitable generalized coordinate to bring the hamiltonian to the free particle form . the resulting eigenvalues are shown to reduce to those of a particle on a circle in the limit as the number of sides @xmath0 and to those of a particle in an infinite potential well in the @xmath1 case .
we begin by constructing the full lagrangian for a particle of unit mass constrained to move on an @xmath2-sided regular polygon .
the @xmath2-gon can be parametrized by @xmath3 where @xmath4 labels the sides of the polygon . as shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] , @xmath5 is the length of the normal from the center of the circumcircle ( of radius @xmath6 ) to the side .
the length of a side is then given by @xmath7 . the lagrangian will be given by @xmath8 where @xmath9 is a lagrange multiplier implementing the constraint @xmath10 to reduce the lagrangian to the only relevant degree of freedom i.e. , @xmath11 , we employ the constraint directly to bring it to the form @xmath12 the momentum conjugate to the coordinate @xmath11 is @xmath13 finally , the classical reduced hamiltonian is given by @xmath14
a closer look at the hamiltonian eq .
[ clhamilt ] reveals that if we introduce a new generalized coordinate @xmath15 it reduces to the simple free particle form @xmath16 following the usual schrdinger prescription for quantization , the quantum canonical momentum is @xmath17 .
the hamiltonian is therefore the usual free particle schrodinger operator @xmath18 a more formal approach to the quantization of such a hamiltonian eq .
[ clhamilt ] would be to construct the laplace - beltrami operator in terms of the properly constructed quantum momentum operator @xcite .
we emphasize that the same quantum hamiltonian is obtained by this procedure also .
the free particle solutions are now given by the plane waves @xmath19 reverting back to the @xmath11 variable we have @xmath20 for the wavefunction in the @xmath21 side . the normalization is obtained from @xmath22 whence @xmath23 .
the boundary condition following from the singlevaluedness of the wavefunction @xmath24 leads to the quantization condition @xmath25 the energy eigenvalues are now given by @xmath26 we note that the above quantization conditions are also obtained by considering symmetric and antisymmetric solutions about the midpoint of a side , @xmath27 namely , @xmath28 and @xmath29 and imposing the periodic boundary conditions @xmath30 in fig .
[ fig2 ] we show the solutions for a hexagon ( @xmath31 ) .
the familiar example of a particle moving on a circle@xcite would correspond to the limit @xmath0 for the polygon model . in this limit , as each side of the polygon reduces to just a point , it is necessary to redefine the conjugate variables as @xmath32 for the angle variable and @xmath33 for the angular momentum in units of @xmath34 .
we see that the eigenvalues now become @xmath35 and the eigenfunctions reduce to the well known solutions @xmath36 for a free particle on a circle .
in the interesting case of @xmath1 , classically the polygon reduces to just a segment of length @xmath37 traversed in both directions as discussed very lucidly by anicin @xcite .
quantum mechanically this is equivalent to a particle confined in an infinite potential well of width @xmath37 . indeed , the eigenvalue equation eq .
[ energy ] reduces to the familiar eigenvalues @xmath38 note that in the above we have effected the replacement of wavevector @xmath39 by @xmath40 to take care of the two - fold reflection symmetry which is inherent in the reduction of the polygon to the segment of length @xmath37 .
we remark that since the parameterization eq .
[ rcoord ] of the polygon does not survive down to the @xmath1 case for obvious reasons , the eigenfunctions can not be expressed in terms of the variable @xmath41 or @xmath11 . the eigenvalue equation eq .
[ energy ] , nevertheless , is robust and gives the true eigenvalues .
we have quantized newton s polygon model and derived the general eigenvalues and eigenfunctions .
we have recovered the quantum mechanics in the circle limit of the polygon . moreover ,
the energy eigenvalues for the @xmath1 case have been identified with those of a particle in an infinite potential well . in the light of the above results it would be interesting exercise for students of introductory courses on quantum mechanics to look into the polygon analogues of the well studied problems of stark effect for rotor@xcite , aharonov - bohm effect for a particle on a circle etc .. we gratefully acknowledge fruitful discussions with v. v. shenoi , and j. kamila .
one of the authors ( rkp ) would like to thank the institute of physics , bhubaneswar , for hospitality where a part of the work was carried out . | model of particle bouncing off circular constraint on polygonal path devised by newton centripetal force with circular motion force operating on particle on circle limiting case motion on polygon corners force centers simplicity of circle case to newton s original model problem received attention from historical perspective no quantum mechanical treatment available quantum mechanics of polygon model pedagogical value for introductory courses quantum theory illustration of symmetry rotational symmetry of problem reflected in wavefunction reduce lagrangian for system constraint equation use generalized coordinate to bring hamiltonian to free particle form resulting eigenvalues reduce to particle on circle in and particle in infinite potential in @xmath1 begin constructing full lagrangian for particle of unit mass constrained to move on @xmath2-sided regular polygon @xmath2-gon parametrized by @xmath3 @xmath4 labels sides polygon @xmath5 is length of normal from center circumcircle to side length of side given by @xmath7 lagrangian given by @xmath8 @xmath9 is lagrange multiplier implementing constraint @xmath10 to reduce lagrangian to relevant degree of freedom@xmath11 employ constraint form @xmath12 momentum conjugate coordinate is @xmath13 classical reduced hamiltonian given by @xmath14 new coordinate @xmath15 reduces to free particle form @xmath16 quantum canonical momentum is @xmath17 hamiltonian free particle schrodinger operator @xmath18 formal approach quantization hamiltonian construct laplace - beltrami operator constructed quantum momentum operator @xcite same quantum hamiltonian obtained procedure free particle solutions given by plane waves @xmath19 @xmath11 variable @xmath20 wavefunction @xmath21 side normalization from @xmath22 @xmath23 boundary condition singlevaluedness wavefunction @xmath24 leads to quantization condition @xmath25 energy eigenvalues given by @xmath26 quantization conditions obtained considering symmetric antisymmetric solutions midpoint side @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 periodic boundary conditions @xmath30 fig solutions for hexagon ( @xmath31 particle moving on circle@xcite to limit @xmath0 for polygon modellimit side polygon reduces to point redefine conjugate variables @xmath32 angle @xmath33 angular momentum @xmath34 eigenvalues become @xmath35 eigenfunctions reduce to @xmath36 free particle circle @xmath1 polygon reduces to segment length @xmath37 traversed both directions discussed anicin @xcite quantum mechanically equivalent to particle in infinite potential well @xmath37 eigenvalue equation eq . [ energy ] reduces to familiar eigenvalues @xmath38 wavevector @xmath39 by @xmath40 two - fold reflection symmetry reduction polygon to segment length @xmath37 parameterization eq . [ rcoord ] polygon survive @xmath1 case eigenfunctions expressed variable @xmath41 or @xmath11 eigenvalue equation eq . [ energy ] robust gives true eigenvalues quantized newton s polygon model derived general eigenvalues eigenfunctions recovered quantum mechanics in circle limit polygon energy eigenvalues @xmath1 case identified with particle in infinite potential well students quantum mechanics polygon analogues stark effect rotor@xcite aharonov - bohm effect particle circle acknowledge discussions with v.v. shenoi j. kamila authors rkp thank institute of physics bhubaneswar hospitality part work carried out | 0.262661 | 1,356 | 688 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,899 | based on the color - spin interaction in diquarks , we argue that charmed multiquark hadrons are likely to exist .
because of the appreciable number of charm quarks produced in central nucleus - nucleus collisions at ultrarelativistic energies , production of charmed multiquark hadrons is expected to be enhanced in these collisions . using both the quark coalescence model and the statistical hadronization model
, we estimate the yield of charmed tetraquark meson @xmath0 and pentaquark baryon @xmath1 in heavy ion collisions at rhic and lhc .
we further discuss the decay modes of these charmed exotic hadrons in order to facilitate their detections in experiments . | possible existence of exotic mesons consisting of two quarks and two anti - quarks was first suggested by jaffe in the framework of the mit bag model @xcite . since then , there have been continuous discussions on whether the mesons in the scalar nonet are candidates for such tetraquark mesons .
recently , interest in tetraquark mesons has been extended to include those containing heavy quarks @xcite , as several heavy mesons , that were observed in @xmath2 meson decays , do not seem to fit well within the conventional quark model @xcite .
tetraquark mesons with two heavy anti - quarks ( @xmath3 ) , henceforth called @xmath4 , are particularly interesting as they are explicitly exotic from flavor considerations @xcite . moreover
, simple theoretical consideration based on the color - spin interaction @xcite shows that for such configurations the binding energy increases as the mass of the heavy quark increases .
calculations based on the flavor - spin interaction @xcite or the instanton induced interactions @xcite also show that the mass of @xmath0 is below that of two charmed mesons . for a similar reason , the chance of having a stable heavy pentaquark ( @xmath5 ) increases as the mass of heavy anti - quark becomes larger .
experimental observation of such explicitly exotic hadrons is crucial in refining our understanding of multiquark interactions in low energy qcd .
however , producing the @xmath4 from an elementary process is highly suppressed as it involves creating two @xmath6 pairs from the vacuum .
in contrast , in relativistic heavy ion collisions at lhc , @xmath7 pairs are expected to be abundantly produced @xcite . since the hadronization from the quark - gluon plasma produced in these collisions tends to follow a statistical description , production of exotic hadrons in heavy ion collisions at lhc is thus much more favorable than in elementary reactions @xcite . in this work ,
we first give a qualitative argument why multiquark hadrons consisting of heavy quarks are likely to exist .
using both the quark coalescence model and the statistical hadronization model , we then give estimates of how many @xmath4 and charmed pentaquark baryons , if they exist , will be produced in central heavy ion collisions at both rhic and lhc . furthermore
, possible decay modes of these charmed exotic hadrons are discussed .
sophisticated constituent quark model calculations have been performed to study possible stable multiquark hadrons that consist of heavy quarks .
these results can be roughly understood in terms of simple arguments based on the color - spin interaction . to illustrate the mechanism , we introduce the following simplified form for the color - spin interaction @xcite : @xmath8 here @xmath9 and @xmath10 are the mass and spin of the constituent quarks @xmath11 and @xmath12 .
the strength of the color - spin interaction @xmath13 should depend on the wave function and the exact form of the interaction as well as the color structure of either the quark - quark or quark - antiquark pair .
the color factor would be @xmath14 for diquarks in the color antitriplet channel and @xmath15 for quark and anti - quark pair in the color singlet channel .
this simple form with @xmath16 for a diquark and @xmath17 for a quark - antiquark pair can capture some of the essential physics in hadron masses .
to illustrate this point , we assume the following constituent quark masses : @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , and @xmath21 .
.baryon mass relations .
the first column is fit to experiments . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^ " , ] [ table11 ]
lastly , we comment on the possibility to measure doubly charmed baryons in heavy ion collisions .
the doubly charmed baryon @xmath22 have been observed by the selex collaboration in the @xmath23 and in the @xmath24 decay modes with a mass of ( @xmath25 ) mev @xcite .
the same collaboration has also successfully measured @xmath26 in the @xmath27 decay mode with a mass of 3460 mev @xcite . on the other hand
, attempts by the focus collaboration in the photoproduction experiment , and by the babar in @xmath28 annihilation experiments @xcite have so far failed to establish the existence of the doubly charmed baryons .
hence , it is an interesting problem to search for the doubly charmed baryons in heavy ion collisions . using the coalescence model , we find that the number of @xmath26 produced are @xmath29 at rhic , and @xmath30 at lhc .
therefore , we will be able to realistically measure @xmath26 and @xmath22 through their decay vertices to @xmath23 and @xmath24 , and to @xmath27 , respectively .
based on the consideration of the color - spin interaction between diquarks , which describes reasonably the mass splittings between many hadrons and their spin flipped partners , we have shown that tetraquark mesons and pentaquark baryons that consist of two charmed quarks could be bound . using the quark coalescence model , their yields in heavy ion collisions at both rhic and lhc
are estimated . because of the expected large charm quark number in central pb+pb collisions at lhc , the abundances of the tetraquark meson @xmath0 and pentaquark baryon @xmath1 are about @xmath31 and @xmath32 , respectively .
we have also discussed their decay modes to illustrate how they can be identified in heavy ion collisions . in our studies , we have not taken into account the hadronic effect on the abundance of these charmed exotics , as hadronic reactions that affect their annihilation and production are unknown .
since the yields of @xmath0 and @xmath1 from the coalescence model is significantly smaller than those expected from the statistical hadronization model , including the hadronic effect is expected to increase their yields substantially and reduces the differences from the predictions from the quark coalescence model and the statistical hadronization model . also , charmed hadrons would be more abundantly produced , particularly the @xmath0 , if charm quarks are produced from the qgp formed in these collisions
. we also comment on the possible measurement of doubly charmed baryons in heavy ion collisions , and the estimated numbers are @xmath29 and @xmath30 at rhic and lhc , respectively .
we thus expect that the open and hidden charmed hadron physics will be an interesting subject in the forthcoming heavy ion collision experiments .
the work of shl and sy was supported by the korea research foundation krf-2006-c00011 , while that of cmk and wl was supported by the u.s .
national science foundation under grant no .
phy-0457265 and the welch foundation under grant no .
a-1358 .
r. l. jaffe , phys .
d * 15 * , 267 ( 1977 ) ; phys .
d * 17 * , 1444 ( 1978 ) .
s. zouzou , b. silvestre - brac , c. gignoux and j. m. richard , z. phys .
c * 30 * , 457 ( 1986 ) . c. semay and b. silvestre - brac , z. phys .
c * 61 * ( 1994 ) 271 .
s. l. zhu , arxiv : hep - ph/0703225 .
a. v. manohar and m. b. wise , nucl .
b * 399 * , 17 ( 1993 ) .
a. de rujula , h. georgi and s. l. glashow , phys .
d * 12 * , 147 ( 1975 ) .
l. y. glozman and d. o. riska , phys .
rept . * 268 * , 263 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9505422 ] .
s. pepin , f. stancu , m. genovese and j. m. richard , phys .
b * 393 * , 119 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9609348 ] .
d. m. brink and f. stancu , phys .
d * 57 * , 6778 ( 1998 ) .
s. chernyshev , m. a. nowak and i. zahed , phys . rev .
d * 53 * , 5176 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9510326 ] .
b. w. zhang , c. m. ko , and w. liu , nucl - th/0709.1684 . c. nonaka , b. muller , m. asakawa , s. a. bass and r. j. fries , phys
. rev .
c * 69 * , 031902 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : nucl - th/0312081 ] .
l. maiani , a. d. polosa , v. riquer and c. a. salgado , phys .
b * 645 * , 138 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0606217 ] . b. silvestre - brac and c. semay , z. phys .
c * 59 * , 457 ( 1993 ) .
f. s. navarra , m. nielsen and s. h. lee , arxiv : hep - ph/0703071 .
t. nakano _ et al .
91 ( 2003 ) 012002 .
e. hiyama , m. kamimura , a. hosaka , h. toki and m. yahiro , phys .
b * 633 * , 237 ( 2006 ) .
f. stancu , phys .
b * 595 * , 269 ( 2004 ) [ erratum - ibid .
b * 598 * , 295 ( 2004 ) ] .
f. stancu , aip conf .
proc . * 775 * , 32 ( 2005 ) .
r. l. jaffe , f. wilczek , phys .
* 91 * ( 2003 ) 232003 .
k. maltman , phys .
b * 604 * , 175 ( 2004 ) .
y. sarac , h. kim , s. h. lee , phys .
d * 73 * , 014009 ( 2006 ) .
h. j. lipkin , phys .
b * 195 * , 484 ( 1987 ) .
e. m. aitala _ et al .
_ [ e791 collaboration ] , phys .
lett . * 81 * , 44 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ex/9709013 ] .
e. m. aitala _ et al .
_ [ e791 collaboration ] , phys .
b * 448 * , 303 ( 1999 ) .
r. mattiello , a. jahns , h. srge , h. stcker , and w. greiner , phys .
lett . * 74 * , 2180 ( 1995 ) ; r. mattiello , h. srge , h. stcker , and w. greiner , phys .
c * 55 * , 1443 ( 1997 ) . v. greco , c. m. ko , and p. lvai , phys .
90 * , 202302 ( 2003 ) ; phys .
c * 68 * , 034904 ( 2003 ) ; v. greco , c. m. ko , r. rapp , phys . lett .
b595 , 202 ( 2004 ) arxiv : nucl - th/0312100 . l. w. chen and c. m. ko , phys .
c * 73 * , 044903 ( 2005 ) .
m. mattson _
[ selex collaboration ] , phys .
* 89 * , 112001 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ex/0208014 ] .
a. ocherashvili _ et al .
_ [ selex collaboration ] , phys .
b * 628 * , 18 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ex/0406033 ] .
j. s. russ [ selex collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0209075 . s. p. ratti , nucl .
suppl . * 115 * , 33 ( 2003 ) .
b. aubert _ et al .
_ [ babar collaboration ] , phys .
d * 74 * , 011103 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ex/0605075 ] . | exotic mesons two quarks two anti - quarks suggested by jaffe mit bag model continuous discussions on mesons in scalar nonet candidates for tetraquark mesons interest in tetraquark mesons extended to heavy quarks fit conventional quark model tetraquark mesons with two heavy anti - quarks ( @xmath3 ) called @xmath4 explicitly exotic from flavor considerations binding energy increases as mass heavy quark increases calculations mass of @xmath0 below two charmed mesons chance stable heavy pentaquark ( @xmath5 ) increases as mass of heavy anti - quark becomes larger experimental observation of exotic hadrons crucial multiquark interactions in low energy qcd producing @xmath4 from elementary process suppressed involves creating two @xmath6 pairs from vacuum in relativistic heavy ion collisions at lhc @xmath7 pairs abundantly produced hadronization from quark - gluon plasma statistical description production of exotic hadrons in heavy ion collisions at more favorable than elementary reactionswork qualitative argument multiquark hadrons heavy quarks likely exist using quark coalescence model statistical hadronization model estimates @xmath4 charmed pentaquark baryons in central heavy ion collisions at rhic lhc decay modes hadrons discussed constituent quark model calculations stable multiquark hadrons heavy quarks results understood arguments color - spin interaction simplified form color - spin interaction @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 mass spin of constituent quarks @xmath11 @xmath12 strength color spin interaction @xmath13 on wave function form interaction color structure quark - quark quark - antiquark pair color factor @xmath14 for diquarks color antitriplet channel @xmath15 for quark anti - quark color singlet channel form @xmath16 diquark @xmath17 quark - antiquark pair essential physics hadron masses assume constituent quark masses @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath21 .baryon mass relations first column fit experiments table11 comment measure doubly charmed baryons in heavy ion collisionsdoubly charmed baryon @xmath22 observed selex collaboration @xmath23 @xmath24 decay modes mass @xmath25 ) mev @xcite measured @xmath26 @xmath27 decay mode mass 3460 mev @xcite attempts focus collaboration photoproduction babar @xmath28 annihilation experiments failed establish existence doubly charmed baryons problem search for heavy ion collisions coalescence model @xmath26 produced @xmath29 at rhic @xmath30 at lhc measure @xmath26 @xmath22 through decay vertices @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath27 color - spin interaction diquarks tetraquark mesons pentaquark baryons two charmed quarks could be bound quark coalescence model yields in heavy ion collisions at rhic lhc estimated large charm quark number central pb+pb collisions at lhc abundances tetraquark meson @xmath0 pentaquark baryon @xmath1 about @xmath31 @xmath32 discussed decay modes heavy ion collisionshadronic effect on abundance charmed exotics unknown yields @xmath0 @xmath1 from coalescence model smaller than statistical model hadronic effect expected yields differences coalescence charmed hadrons abundantly produced particularly @xmath0 if charm quarks produced from collisions measurement doubly charmed baryons in heavy ion collisions estimated numbers are @xmath29 @xmath30 at rhic lhc expect charmed hadron physics interesting in heavy ion collision experiments work of shl sy supported by korea research foundation-2006-c00011 cmk wl u.s national science foundation-0457265 welch foundation l. jaffe phys . d * 15 * , 267 ( 1977 ) 17 * 1444 ( 1978 ) zouzou b. silvestre - brac gignoux richard phys . c * 30 * 457 ( 1986 ) semay silvestre - brac phys 61 * ( 1994 ) zhu arxiv hep - ph/0703225. manohar b. wise nucl b * 399 *, 17 ( 1993 )rujula georgi glashow phys. d 12 147 ( 1975 ) glozman riska phys 268 263 ( 1996 ) hep - ph/9505422 pepin f stancu genovese richard phys 393 119 ( 1997 ) hep - ph/9609348 brink f stancu d 57 6778 ( 1998 ) chernyshev nowak zahed . d 53 5176 ( 1996 ) hep - ph/9510326 zhang. ko w liu nucl - th/0709.1684 nonaka muller asakawa bass j fries . 69 * 031902 ( 2004 ) nucl - th/0312081 maiani polosa v. riquer salgado phys . 645 138 ( 2007 ) hep - ph/0606217 silvestre - brac semay phys . 59 * 457 ( 1993 ) s. navarra nielsen h. lee hep - ph/0703071 nakano al 91 ( 2003 ) 012002 hiyama kamimura hosaka toki yahiro phys . b 633 * 237 ( 2006 )stancu phys . b 595 269 ( 2004 ) erratum b 598 295 2004 stancu conf 775 32 ( 2005 ) jaffe wilczek . 91 * 2003 ) maltman phys b 604 175 ( 2004 ) sarac kim lee phys . d 73 * 014009 ( 2006 ) lipkin . b 195 484 ( 1987 ) aitala e791 collaboration phys . lett 81 44 ( 1998 ) hep - ex/9709013 collaboration b 448 303 ( 1999 ) mattiello jahns h srge stcker greiner phys . lett 74 * 2180 ( 1995 ) phys 55 1443 ( 1997 ) greco c m. ko p lvai phys . 90 * 202302 ( 2003 ) phys c 68 * 034904 ( 2003 ) greco rapp phys . lett b595 202 ( 2004 ) nucl - th/0312100 chen c m. ko phys . c 73 * 044903 ( 2005 )mattson selex collaboration phys . 89 112001 2002 ) hep - ex/0208014 ocherashvili selex collaboration phys . 628 18 2005 ) hep - ex/0406033 russ selex collaboration hep - ex/0209075 ratti nucl suppl 115 33 ( 2003 ) aubert babar collaboration phys . 74 011103 2006 ) hep - ex/0605075 | 0.44266 | 2,972 | 1,522 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,907 | we present new results on 2-particle azimuthal ( @xmath0 ) correlation relative to event plane and 3-particle pseudorapidity ( @xmath1 ) correlation at mid - rapidity in au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 200 gev , measured by the star experiment . while jet - like correlation is symmetric , ridge is found to be asymmetric when trigger particle azimuth is between in- and out - of - plane .
the charge ordering properties between associated and trigger particles are exploited to separate jet - like and ridge contributions in 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations .
we found that like - sign triplets are dominated by ridge . the separated ridge , while narrow in @xmath0 , is extremely broad in @xmath1 .
the ridge particles are not only uncorrelated to the trigger particle in @xmath1 , but also uncorrelated between themselves . | the observation of the ridge , a long range pseudorapidity ( @xmath1 ) correlation at near - side @xcite , in dihadron correlations has motivated many theoretical investigations @xcite .
understanding the formation mechanism of the ridge may provide insight into the early dynamics of relativistic heavy ion collision .
we investigate the ridge using two tools : dihadron correlation relative to event plane and 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations .
we discuss what have already been learned from previous studies @xcite and present new findings at this conference .
the ridge magnitude was found to decrease with trigger particle azimuth relative to event plane ( @xmath3 ) from in - plane ( @xmath4@xmath5@xmath4@xmath6@xmath7 ) to out - of - plane ( @xmath4@xmath5@xmath4@xmath6@xmath8 ) @xcite .
motivated by our data , chiu and hwa @xcite proposed the correlated emission model ( cem ) where the ridge is formed by correlated particle emission due to aligned jet propagation and medium flow and predicted asymmetric near - side @xmath0 correlations .
we present a study of this asymmetry from our data .
we found the ridge is asymmetric and the asymmetry peaks at @xmath5@xmath6@xmath9 .
the broadness of the ridge was found to be event - by - event from 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations @xcite . by further analyzing their charge dependence , we may separate jet - like and ridge components without assuming the shape of the ridge in @xmath1 .
we find like - sign triplets are dominated by ridge and use this observation to separate the jet - like and ridge components .
we find jet - like correlation is narrow , and ridge is broad and approximately uniform in @xmath1 .
dihadron correlations are studied for trigger particles separately in @xmath5@xmath10@xmath7 and @xmath5@xmath11@xmath7 for 20 - 60@xmath12 au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 200 gev .
the @xmath13 ranges of the trigger and associated particles are 3@xmath11@xmath14@xmath114 gev / c and 1@xmath11@xmath15@xmath11 2 gev / c , respectively , and both within @xmath4@xmath16@xmath4@xmath111 .
the event plane angle is constructed from particles outside the @xmath13 range used in the correlation study .
the dihadron correlation signal obtained for each @xmath5 slice has a large background contribution from anisotropic flow ( @xmath17 and @xmath18 ) .
the construction and subtraction of this background is described in detail in ref .
the jet - like yield is obtained from the difference between the raw correlation in @xmath4@xmath1@xmath190.7 , containing both jet - like component and the ridge , and that in @xmath4@xmath1@xmath200.7 ( scaled by @xmath1 acceptance factor ) containing presumably only the ridge component .
the systematic uncertainties are largely canceled in the jet - like result . to obtain the near - side ridge
, we fit the away - side correlation within @xmath4@xmath1@xmath200.7 to two gaussian of the same width , and then subtract the extrapolated fit to the near - side to remove away - side leakage to the ridge @xcite .
the remaining is the near - side ridge @xmath0 correlation .
we analyze the asymmetry parameter of the @xmath0 correlations by @xmath21 where @xmath22 . for 20 - 60@xmath12 au+au collisions .
the shaded bands represent the systematic uncertainties in the flow estimation . also shown by the black curve
is the prediction from cem . ]
figure [ fig1 ] shows @xmath23 for jet - like and ridge @xmath0 correlations as a function of @xmath5 for 20 - 60@xmath12 au+au collisions .
the ridge is found to be asymmetric with the maximum asymmetry appearing at @xmath5@xmath645@xmath24 , while jet is symmetric .
the ridge asymmetry is persistent for different associated @xmath13 .
the ridge asymmetry is qualitatively consistent with the cem prediction @xcite , suggesting that formation of the ridge may be due to jet - flow alignment .
however , we note that cem does not have dynamics depending on particle @xmath13 , nor does it have mechanisms to create correlations between particles separated by large @xmath1 . in general , the ridge @xmath0 asymmetry may be obtained by models which incorporate interplay between jet propagation and radial flow .
we have analyzed the 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations data in @xmath25+au , 40 - 80@xmath12 and 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 200 gev @xcite . the trigger and associated particles
are restricted to @xmath4@xmath16@xmath4@xmath111 and @xmath4@xmath0@xmath4@xmath110.7 .
the @xmath13 ranges are 1@xmath11@xmath15@xmath113@xmath11@xmath14@xmath1110 gev / c .
we further analyze different charge combinations in an attempt to separate the jet - like and ridge components and their structures .
the 3-particle correlation raw signal is obtained from all triplet of one trigger and two associated particles from the same event .
the signal is binned in @xmath26 and @xmath27 , the pseudorapidity differences between the associated particles and the trigger .
combinatorial background arises when one or neither of the two associated particles are correlated with the trigger particle besides flow correlation .
details about background construction , systematic uncertainties and correction factors can be found in ref .
the 2- and 3-particle correlation yields are corrected for the centrality- , @xmath13- and @xmath28-dependent reconstruction efficiencies for associated particles and the @xmath28-dependent efficiency for trigger particles , and are normalized per corrected trigger particle .
( @xmath4@xmath0@xmath4@xmath110.7 ) corrected for @xmath1 acceptance in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions for 3@xmath11@xmath14@xmath1110 gev / c and 1@xmath11@xmath15@xmath113 gev / c .
the distributions are separated between like - sign ( square ) and unlike - sign ( triangle ) trigger - associated pairs . ]
figure [ fig2 ] shows the dihadron @xmath1 correlation between associated and trigger particles on the near - side ( @xmath4@xmath0@xmath4@xmath110.7 ) in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
the correlation is separated for like - sign and unlike - sign pairs .
there are more unlike - sign than like - sign pairs at @xmath4@xmath1@xmath4@xmath60 .
this is due to the charge ordering in jet fragmentation . at larger @xmath4@xmath1@xmath4@xmath100.7 ,
the unlike - sign and like - sign correlations are similar indicating the ridge particles have no charge dependence .
correlation in same - sign triplets should be dominated by ridge correlation because the probability of a jet fragmenting into 3 same - sign particles in our @xmath13 range is negligible .
therefore , we separate the charge ordered triplets in 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations with like - sign triplets ( @xmath29 ) and like - sign associated pairs with an opposite - sign trigger particle ( @xmath30 ) .
-@xmath1 correlations for 3@xmath11@xmath14@xmath1110 gev / c and 1@xmath11@xmath15@xmath113 gev / c for @xmath29 in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
right : average 3-particle correlations signal for associated particles are of same charge sign as a function of @xmath31 on @xmath1-@xmath1 plane in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
systematic errors are shown in the shaded box due to background normalization ] figure [ fig3](left ) shows the background subtracted 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations for @xmath29 in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
the average correlation signal seems to be uniform over @xmath1-@xmath1 region . to quantify this we study the average signal as a function of @xmath31 on @xmath1-@xmath1 plane , shown in fig [ fig3](right ) for @xmath32 ( @xmath29+@xmath30 ) and @xmath29 in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
@xmath32 contains both jet - like and ridge contributions while @xmath29 is dominated by ridge .
since the ridge at large @xmath1 is identical for like - sign and unlike - sign trigger - associated pairs in dihadron correlations , it should also be the same at large @xmath1 in @xmath29 and @xmath30 because the change from the dihadron to trihadron correlation is the addition of third particle of the same charge sign . on @xmath1-@xmath1 plane for 3@xmath11@xmath14@xmath1110 gev / c and 1@xmath11@xmath15@xmath113 gev / c in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
the curves are gaussian fits to the data . ]
therefore , the total jet - like component can be obtained by : jet = 3(@xmath30 - @xmath29 ) , where the factor of 3 takes into account the jet contribution from @xmath30 and @xmath33 charge combinations .
the ridge can then be obtained by subtracting the jet - like component from the total 3-particle correlation where all charge combinations are included . alternatively the ridge can be taken simply as 4 times @xmath29 .
the two methods yield consistent results .
figure [ fig4 ] shows the average signal of the separated ridge and jet - like components from 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations as a function of @xmath31 on @xmath1-@xmath1 plane for 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
the jet - like component is narrow and symmetric between @xmath28 and @xmath16 having a gaussian width @xmath340.25@xmath350.09 . the separated ridge , while narrow in @xmath0 , is extremely broad with gaussian width @xmath341.53@xmath350.41 .
the ridge is also consistent with a uniform distribution within our acceptance with reasonable @xmath36/ndf .
in summary , we have presented dihadron correlations relative to event plane for au+au 20 - 60@xmath12 collisions . while jet - like correlation is symmetric , ridge is found to be asymmetric when trigger particle azimuth is between in- and out - of - plane .
the asymmetry is qualitatively consistent with the correlated particle emission model prediction , suggesting the formation mechanism of the ridge may be due to alignment of jet propagation and medium flow .
we have used the charge ordering properties to separate the jet - like and ridge components via 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations in 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions .
this stems out of the observation that like - sign triplets are dominated by the ridge .
we found that the jet - like correlation is narrowly confined , and the ridge is broadly distributed being approximately uniform in @xmath1 in our measured acceptance .
except small angle correlation in azimuth , the ridge particles appear to be uncorrelated not only with the trigger particle , but also between themselves in @xmath1 .
n. armesto _ et al .
_ , _ phys .
lett . _ * 93 * , 242301 ( 2004 ) ; s. a. voloshin , _ phys .
b _ * 632 * , 490 ( 2006 ) ; m. strickland _ et al . _ , _ eur .
j. _ * a 29 * , 59 ( 2006 ) ; a. majumder _ et al .
_ , _ phys .
lett . _ * 99 * , 042301 ( 2007 ) ; e. shuryak , _ phys .
c _ * 76 * , 047901 ( 2007 ) ; c. y. wong , arxive:0712.3282 ( 2007 ) .
a. dumitru _ et al .
_ , _ nucl .
a _ * 91 * , 810 ( 2008 ) . c. b. chiu and r. c. hwa , _ phys .
c _ * 79 * , 034901 ( 2009 ) ; a. feng ( for star ) , _ j. phys .
g _ * 35 * , 104082 ( 2008 ) .
p. k. netrakanti ( for star ) , _ j. phys .
g _ * 35 * , 104010 ( 2008 ) .
j. konzer and f. wang , nucl . inst . and methods * a 606 * 713 ( 2009 )
. j. konzer ( for star ) , qm2009 , these proccedings . | observation of ridge long range pseudorapidity correlation near - side dihadron correlations motivated theoretical investigations understanding formation mechanism ridge insight early dynamics relativistic heavy ion collision investigate ridge using tools dihadron correlation event 3-particle @xmath1- correlations discuss previous studies present new findings ridge magnitude with trigger particle azimuth relative to event plane from in to out - of - plane chiu and hwa proposed correlated emission model ridge formed by correlated particle emission due to aligned jet propagation medium flow asymmetric near - side @xmath0 correlations study asymmetry ridge asymmetric asymmetry peaks at @xmath5@xmath6@xmath9 broadness ridge event - by - event from 3-particle @xmath1- correlations analyzing charge dependence separate jet - like ridge components without shape like - sign triplets dominated by ridge separate jet - like correlation narrow ridge broad uniform in @xmath1dihadron correlations studied for trigger particles in for 20 - 60@xmath12 collisions at @xmath2 = 200 gev @xmath13 ranges trigger particles are 3 gev / c 1 2 gev / c within event plane angle constructed from particles outside @xmath13 range dihadron correlation signal @xmath5 slice contribution from anisotropic flow ( @xmath17 and ) construction subtraction described jet - like yield from difference between raw correlation in @xmath4@xmath190.7 @xmath4@xmath200.7 systematic uncertainties canceled in jet - like result obtain near - side ridge fit away - side correlation to two gaussian same width subtract extrapolated fit - side to remove leakage ridge remaining near - side ridge @xmath0 correlation analyze asymmetry parameter correlations by @xmath21 @xmath22 for 20 - 60@xmath12+au collisions shaded bands represent systematic uncertainties in flow estimation black curve prediction from cem figure shows @xmath23 jet - like ridge @xmath0 correlations @xmath5 20 - 60@xmath12+au collisions ridge asymmetric maximum asymmetry @xmath5@xmath645@xmath24 jet symmetric ridge asymmetry persistent @xmath13 consistent with cem prediction formation due jet - flow alignment cem dynamics particle @xmath13 mechanisms correlations particles @xmath1 ridge @xmath0 asymmetry models interplay jet propagation radial flow analyzed 3-particle @xmath1-@xmath1 correlations @xmath25+au 40 - 80@xmath12 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions @xmath2 = 200 gev @xcite trigger associated particles restricted @xmath4@xmath16 @xmath13 ranges 1@xmath11@xmath15@xmath113@xmath1110 gev / c analyze charge combinations separate jet - like ridge components 3-particle correlation signal from trigger two particles same event signal binned @xmath26 @xmath27 pseudorapidity differences particles triggercombinatorial background arises when associated particles with trigger particle background construction uncertainties correction factors in ref 2- 3-particle correlation yields corrected for centrality @xmath13 @xmath28-dependent reconstruction efficiencies normalized per corrected trigger particle @xmath4 corrected for @xmath1 acceptance in 0 - 12@xmath12 collisions 3 distributions separated between like - sign unlike - sign trigger - associated pairs figure shows dihadron @xmath1 correlation between trigger particles in 0 - 12 collisions correlation separated for like - sign unlike - sign pairs more unlike - sign pairs at @xmath4 due to charge ordering jet fragmentation @xmath4 unlike - sign - correlations similar ridge particles no charge dependence in same - sign triplets dominated by ridge correlation probability jet fragmenting into 3 same - sign particles in @xmath13 range negligibleseparate charge ordered triplets 3-particle @xmath1- correlations like - sign triplets @xmath29 pairs opposite - sign trigger particle @xmath30@xmath1 correlations for 3 gev gev / @xmath29 0 - 12@xmath12 collisions average 3-particle correlations same charge sign @xmath31 @xmath1- plane errors shaded box background normalization figure subtracted 3-particle @xmath1- correlations @xmath29 - 12 collisions average correlation signal uniform over @xmath1- region study average signal @xmath31 @xmath1- plane fig @xmath32+@xmath30 0 - 12 collisions @xmath32 contains jet - like ridge contributions @xmath29 dominated by ridge ridge @xmath1 identical for like - sign unlike - sign trigger - pairs dihadron correlations same @xmath1 @xmath29 @xmath30 change from dihadron to trihadron correlation addition third particle same charge sign@xmath1- plane 3 1 gev / c 0 - 12@xmath12 collisions curves gaussian data total jet - like component obtained jet = 3(@xmath30 - @xmath29 ) 3 jet contribution @xmath30 charge combinations ridge subtracting jet - 3-particle correlation ridge 4 times @xmath29 methods yield consistent results figure average signal separated ridge jet - like components 3-particle correlations function @xmath31 plane 0 - 12@xmath12 au+au collisions jet - like component narrow symmetric between @xmath28 @xmath16 gaussian width @xmath340.25@xmath350.09 separated ridge narrow broad gaussian width @xmath341.53@xmath350.41 consistent uniform distribution @xmath36/ndf presented dihadron correlations event plane 20 - 60@xmath12 collisions jet - like correlation symmetric ridge asymmetric when trigger particle azimuth between in- out - of - plane asymmetry consistent with particle emission model prediction formation ridge alignment jet propagation medium flowused charge ordering properties separate jet - like ridge components via 3-particle @xmath1- correlations 0 - 12@xmath12 collisions like - sign triplets dominated ridge jet - like correlation narrowly confined ridge broadly distributed uniform in @xmath1 measured acceptance except small angle correlation azimuth ridge particles uncorrelated with trigger particle between @xmath1 armesto . . 93 * , 242301 ( 2004 ) voloshin. 632 * , 490 ( 2006 ) strickland 29 *, 59 ( 2006 ) majumder phys . 99 * , 042301 ( 2007 ) shuryak phys 76 * , 047901 ( 2007 ) wong arxive:0712.3282 ( 2007 ) dumitru. 91 * , 810 ( 2008 ) chiu hwa phys . 79 * , 034901 ( 2009 ) feng phys. 35 *, 104082 ( 2008 ) netrakanti phys 35 *, 104010 ( 2008 ) j. konzer f. wang. inst. methods 606 * 713 ( 2009 )konzer star qm2009 proccedings | 0.509594 | 3,062 | 1,477 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,913 | recent results from long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments point towards a non - zero value of @xmath0 at around @xmath1 confidence level . in the coming years
, further ratification of this result with high significance will have crucial impact on the planning of the future long baseline neutrino factory setup aimed to explore leptonic cp violation and the neutrino mass ordering . in this talk
, we discuss the baseline and energy optimization of the neutrino factory including the latest simulation results on the magnetized iron neutrino detector ( mind ) in the light of both small and large @xmath0 .
we find that in case of small @xmath0 , baselines of about 2500 to 5000 km is the optimal choice for the cp violation measurement with @xmath2 as low as 12 gev can be considered .
however , for large @xmath0 , we show that the lower threshold and the backgrounds reconstructed at lower energies allow in fact for muon energies as low as 5 to 8 gev at considerably shorter baselines , such as fermilab to homestake .
this suggests that with the latest mind simulation , low- and high - energy versions of the neutrino factory are just two different forms of the same experiment optimized for different regions of the parameter space .
euronu - wp6 - 11 - 40 + ific/11 - 60 _ contribution to nufact 11 , xiiith international workshop on neutrino factories , super beams and beta beams , 1 - 6 august 2011 , cern and university of geneva ( submitted to iop conference series ) _ | the performance of future long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments to unravel leptonic cp violation ( cpv ) and the neutrino mass hierarchy ( mh ) is crucially dependent on the achievable event rates and hence strongly on the size of @xmath3 @xcite .
recent t2k
@xcite and minos @xcite data have provided new information on @xmath0 , indicating that 0.01 @xmath4 0.1 at @xmath5 confidence level with a best - fit value of 0.051 ( 0.063 ) for normal ( inverted ) mass ordering @xcite .
it is expected that in the next few years , this hint will be validated with high significance with more informations coming from the t2k , minos and upcoming reactor and no@xmath6a experiments , opening up the possibility of observing cpv in the lepton sector if the dirac cp phase , @xmath7 , is not equal to @xmath8 or @xmath9 .
the prospects of the present generation long baseline experiments , t2k and no@xmath6a in probing cpv and the mass ordering are very limited even if @xmath0 is large @xcite .
the experiment class , which can ultimately address these unsolved issues with unprecedented sensitivity for both small and large @xmath0 , is the neutrino factory @xcite . in a neutrino factory ,
the neutrino beam is created from the decay of muons in flight in the straight sections of a storage ring .
the international neutrino factory and superbeam scoping study @xcite has laid the foundations for the currently ongoing design study for the neutrino factory ( ids - nf ) @xcite which has come up with a first - version baseline setup of a high energy neutrino factory ( henf ) with @xmath10 and two baselines @xmath11 and @xmath12 served by two racetrack - shaped storage rings @xcite .
the most promising avenue to explore cpv and @xmath13 at a neutrino factory is the sub - dominant @xmath14 oscillation channel which produces muons of the opposite charge ( wrong - sign muons ) to those stored in the storage ring and these can be detected with the help of the charge identification capability of a magnetized iron neutrino detector ( mind ) @xcite . as the design of the neutrino factory matures ,
more realistic detector simulation and analysis technique have been developed which improves the efficiency of mind at low energies and also lowers the threshold @xcite .
these new simulations provide the full response matrices for all the signal and background channels . in the most recent analysis @xcite ,
low energy neutrino signal events down to @xmath15 were selected with an efficiency plateau of @xmath1660% for @xmath17 and @xmath1680% for @xmath18 events starting at @xmath16@xmath19 , while maintaining the background level at or below 10@xmath20 .
for the neutral current background , the impact of migration is non - negligible and it is peaked at lower energies .
this feed - down is the strongest effect of migration and thus has potential impact on the energy optimization , since it penalizes neutrino flux at high energies , where there is little oscillation but a large increase in fed - down background .
now we discuss the simultaneous optimization of baseline and muon energy in a green - field neutrino factory scenario @xcite using the new migration matrices for mind detector @xcite .
( true ) for which cpv will be discovered at @xmath1 c.l . as a function of @xmath21 and @xmath22 for the single baseline neutrino factory .
the different panels correspond to different true values of @xmath23 , as given there . here
we consider @xmath24 useful muon decays in total with a 50 kt detector .
the optimal performance is marked by a dot : ( 2200,10.00 ) , ( 2288,13.62 ) , ( 3390,20.00 ) and ( 4345,22.08 ) with regard to their best reaches of the fraction of @xmath7(true ) at : 0.77 , 0.84 , 0.67 and 0.42.,width=491,height=377 ] [ fig : lvse ] here we are interested to optimize @xmath21 and @xmath22 for the single baseline neutrino factory to have cpv discovery at @xmath1 c.l . for different fractions of true values of @xmath7 assuming that the true value of @xmath23 is known .
the different panels of fig .
[ fig : lvse ] depict the same for four different true values of @xmath23 .
as expected , this figure clearly shows that the optimization strongly depends on the true value of @xmath23 chosen . in case of large @xmath25 ,
shorter baselines and lower energies are preferred .
even @xmath22 as low as 5 to @xmath26 at the fermilab - homestake baseline of about @xmath27 is quite close to the optimal choice , which means that the mind detector approaches the magnetized totally active scintillator detector performance of the low energy neutrino factory ( lenf ) @xcite .
note that compared to earlier analyses without feed - down effect due to background migration , now too high @xmath22 are in fact disfavored in the large @xmath23 case .
for the other extreme , @xmath28 , baselines between @xmath29 and @xmath30 km are preferred with @xmath31 gev , which corresponds more to the choice of @xmath32 for henf , such as the ids - nf baseline . including the other two panels
, the optimal region within each panel moves from the lower left on the plots to the upper right as the true value of @xmath23 decreases .
this means that , depending on the choice of true @xmath23 , the optimization results in the lenf , the henf , or an intermediate scenario , and that the low and high energy neutrino factories are just two versions of the same experiment optimized for different parts of the parameter space .
note that , all the figures presented in this talk have been taken from @xcite and all the simulations have been performed using the globes software @xcite .
confidence level is possible as a function of true @xmath23 . from left to right for cpv , mh and @xmath0 .
here we compare the performances of a single baseline lenf with @xmath33 gev , @xmath34 , and a 50 kt mind detector , and a two baseline henf with @xmath35 gev and a 50 kt mind detector at each baseline , and @xmath36 , and @xmath37.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] [ fig : lenf ] in this talk , we have discussed the optimization of the neutrino factory based on the most up - to - date analysis of the mind detector using response matrices for all the signal and background channels . the lower threshold and
higher efficiencies compared to earlier simulations indicate that the mind detector characteristics are getting more similar to the characteristics of the detectors proposed for the lenf ( e.g. , a magnetized tasd ) . for large @xmath23 ,
a single baseline neutrino factory with @xmath22 as low as 5 to 8 gev and a baseline as short as fermilab to homestake ( about @xmath27 ) might be sufficient . in the case of small @xmath38 , however , a two baseline neutrino factory with one baseline between about 2500 km and 5000 km , the other one at about the magic baseline 7500
km is ideal .
the additional information coming from the second baseline which is at the magic distance ( insensitive to @xmath7 ) helps to remove the degeneracies and it enhances the fraction of @xmath7 for which cpv discovery is possible .
[ fig : lenf ] nicely depicts this message where we compare the performance of the optimal single baseline lenf with the optimal two baseline henf for the same mind detector .
it is quite evident from this figure that for @xmath39 the low energy version can perform all of the required measurements , whereas for smaller values the henf is clearly better .
it suggests that this different optimization would be sufficient to compensate for the relative deterioration of performance at large @xmath23 observed in the traditional henf .
we conclude that the features of the new detector simulation that the backgrounds are typically reconstructed at lower energies and that the threshold is lower have significant impact on the optimization of @xmath22 .
the recent simulation results for the mind have reduced the performance margin between tasd and mind considerably .
therefore , we suggest that the low- and high - energy neutrino factory should not be regarded as separate options and they merely correspond to two extreme corners of a common parameter space .
i am grateful to the conveners of working group 1 for the invitation .
i would like to thank patrick huber , jian tang and walter winter for their collaboration .
i would also like to thank nita sinha and paul soler for insightful discussions during nufact11 .
i acknowledge the support from the european union under the european commission framework programme 07 design study euronu , project 212372 and the project consolider - ingenio cup . | future long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments leptonic cp violation neutrino mass hierarchy on event rates size @xmath3 @xcite recent t2k minos data information @xmath0 0.01 @xmath4 0.1 at @xmath5 confidence level best - fit value 0.051 ( 0.063 ) for normal mass ordering @xcite expected hint validated more informations from t2k minos upcoming reactor no@xmath6a experiments observing cpv lepton sector if dirac cp phase @xmath7 not equal to @xmath8 or @xmath9 prospects present generation long baseline experiments t2k no@xmath6a probing cpv mass ordering limited even @xmath0 large experiment class unsolved issues neutrino factory @xcite beam created from decay muons storage ring international neutrino factory superbeam scoping study @xcite foundations for design study neutrino factory first - version baseline setup high energy neutrino factory with @xmath10 baselines @xmath11 @xmath12 racetrack - shaped storage ringspromising avenue explore cpv @xmath13 neutrino factory sub - dominant @xmath14 oscillation channel produces opposite storage ring detected charge identification magnetized iron neutrino detector @xcite design realistic detector simulation analysis technique developed improves efficiency low energies lowers threshold simulations provide full response matrices signal background channels recent analysis low energy neutrino signal events to @xmath15 selected efficiency plateau @xmath1660% for @xmath17 @xmath1680% for @xmath18 events@xmath19 maintaining background level below 10@xmath20 neutral current background impact migration non - negligible peaked at lower energies feed - down strongest effect energy optimization penalizes neutrino flux at high energies discuss optimization baseline muon energy in green - field neutrino factory scenario new migration matrices mind detector cpv discovered at @xmath1 function of @xmath21 @xmath22 single baseline neutrino factory different panels correspond different values @xmath23 consider @xmath24 muon decays with 50 kt detector optimal performance marked by ( 2200,10.00 2288,13.62 3390,20.00 4345,22.08 best reaches fraction @xmath7 at 0.77 0.84 0.67 0.42=491=377 fig lvse optimize @xmath21 @xmath22 single baseline neutrino factory cpv discovery at @xmath1 c.l different fractions true values @xmath7 true value @xmath23 known panels fig depict same four true values @xmath23 optimization depends on true value @xmath23 large @xmath25 shorter baselines lower energies preferred @xmath22 low 5 to @xmath26 fermilab - homestake baseline @xmath27 close to optimal choice mind detector approaches magnetized active scintillator detector performance low energy neutrino factory @xcite too high @xmath22 disfavored in large @xmath23 case other extreme @xmath28 baselines between @xmath29 and @xmath30 km preferred with @xmath31 gev choice @xmath32 henf optimal region moves lower left to upper right as true value @xmath23 decreaseson choice @xmath23 optimization results in lenf henf or intermediate scenario low and high energy neutrino factories two versions of same experiment for different parts parameter space figures from @xcite simulations performed using globes software @xcite confidence level function of @xmath23 cpv mh @xmath0 compare performances single baseline lenf with @xmath33 gev @xmath34 50 kt mind detector two baseline henf with @xmath35 gev 50 kt mind detector @xmath36 @xmath37 discussed optimization neutrino factory based on analysis mind detector response matrices lower threshold higher efficiencies indicate mind detector characteristics similar to for lenf for large @xmath23 single baseline neutrino factory with @xmath22 low 5 to 8 gev baseline short as fermilab to homestake @xmath27 ) sufficient small @xmath38 two baseline neutrino factory one baseline between 2500 km and 5000 km other at magic baseline 7500 km ideal additional information from second baseline magic distance insensitive to @xmath7 degeneracies enhances fraction of @xmath7 for cpv discoveryfig : lenf ] performance optimal single baseline lenf with two baseline henf same mind detector @xmath39 low energy version required measurements smaller values henf better different optimization for deterioration performance @xmath23 in traditional henf new detector simulation backgrounds reconstructed at lower energies threshold lower impact optimization @xmath22 recent simulation results reduced performance margin between tasd mind suggest low- high - energy neutrino factory not separate options correspond to two extreme corners of common parameter space grateful to conveners working group 1 invitation patrick huber jian tang walter winter collaboration nita sinha paul soler discussions nufact11 acknowledge support european union european commission framework programme 07 design study euronu project 212372 project consolider - ingenio cup | 0.321378 | 2,012 | 1,059 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,920 | the characteristics of the high - energy emission from polar cap accelerators will be discussed .
particles accelerated in the slot gap " near the polar cap rim will reach altitudes of several stellar radii before initiating pair cascades , producing a wide hollow cone of emission in young pulsars and some millisecond pulsars .
model x - ray and gamma - ray spectra and pulse profiles , based on monte - carlo simulations of polar cap pair cascades , will be presented .
# 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
lett . _ * # 1 * , l#2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
rev . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
suppl .
ser . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
j. _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ ann .
rev .
astron .
astrophys . _
* # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. lett .
_ * # 1 * , l#2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. suppl .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
space sci .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ adv .
space res .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ bull .
astron .
inst .
czechosl .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ j. quant .
spectrosc .
radiat .
transfer _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ mon . not .
r. astr .
soc . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ mem .
r. astr .
soc . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ phys .
lett .
rev . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ publ .
astron .
. japan _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ publ .
astr .
soc .
pacific _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ nature _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ mem .
soc .
astron .
it . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ the messenger _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
nach . _ * # 1 * , # 2 epsf.sty | the number of rotation - powered pulsars with detected emission at x - ray and @xmath0-ray energies has been steadily growing ( thompson 2001 , becker & aschenbach 2002 ) .
although the theory of pulsar acceleration and high - energy emission has been studied for over twenty - five years , the origin of the pulsed non - thermal emission is a question that remains unsettled .
the observations to date have not been able to clearly distinguish between an emission site at the magnetic poles ( daugherty & harding 1996 ) and emission in the outer magnetosphere ( cheng , ho & ruderman 1986 , hirotani & shibata 2001 ) . in the case of polar cap ( pc ) models , while the energetics and pair - cascade spectrum have had success in reproducing the observations , the predicted beam size of radiation emitted near the neutron star ( ns ) surface is too small to produce the wide pulse profiles that are observed ( thompson et al .
however , arons ( 1983 ) first noted the possibility of a high - altitude acceleration region or slot gap " ( near the pc rim , based on the finding of arons & scharlemann ( 1979 , hereafter as79 ) that the pair formation front , above which the accelerating field is screened , occurs at increasingly higher altitude as the magnetic colatitude approaches the last open field line where the electric field vanishes .
we have re - examined the slot - gap model with the inclusion of two new features : 1 ) the acceleration due to inertial - frame dragging ( muslimov & tsygan 1992 ) and 2 ) the additional decrease in the electric field near the boundary at the edge of the polar cap due to the narrowness of the slot gap .
these two effects combine to enable acceleration to altitudes of several stellar radii in the slot gap at all azimuthal angles around the polar cap .
these features result in the production of a larger high - energy emission beam at smaller magnetic inclination angles , both necessary for widely spaced double - peaked pulse profiles .
in the space - charge limited flow acceleration model ( arons & scharlemann 1979 ) , electrons are freely emitted from the neutron star surface near the magnetic poles and accelerated in steady - state .
when the electrons achieve a sufficient lorentz factor they radiate curvature and inverse compton photons that can produce electron - positron pairs in the strong magnetic field .
some of the positrons turn around and accelerate downward toward the neutron star , while the electrons accelerate upward .
this pair polarization screens the electric field above a pair formation front ( pff ) .
these models assume a boundary condition that the accelerating electric field and potential are zero at the last open field line .
since near the boundary , a larger distance is required for the electrons to accelerate to the lorentz factor needed to radiate photons energetic enough to produce pairs , the pff occurs at higher and higher altitudes as the boundary is approached .
the pff thus curves upward , approaching infinity and becoming asymptotically tangent to the last open field line .
if the electric field is effectively screened above the pff , then a narrow slot surrounded by two conducting walls is formed ( see figure 1 ) . within this slot gap , the electric field
is further screened by the presence of the second conducting boundary and acceleration occurs at a reduced rate .
pair production and pair cascades therefore do not take place near the neutron star surface in the slot gap , as do the pair cascades along field lines closer to the magneic pole ( core ) , but occur at much higher altitudes .
there are several important differences between our revised slot - gap model and the original slot - gap model of arons & sharlemann ( 1979 ) .
the inclusion of general relativistic frame dragging enables particle acceleration on both favorably " and unfavorable " curved field lines and also at all inclination angles .
we also consider the radiation from pair cascades occurring along the interior edge of the slot gap .
the cascade radiation emission beam from the slot gap is thus a full hollow cone centered on the magnetic axis .
a narrower emission beam from field lines interior to the slot gap will form a core component of pairs and high - energy emission .
the electrodynamics of the slot gap is primarily dependent on a single parameter , the slot gap width , @xmath1 .
the ratio of the electric field in the slot gap to the electric field in the core region of the pc is @xmath2 and the luminosity of particles accelerated in the slot gap is @xmath3 where @xmath4 is the spin - down luminosity of the pulsar ( for full details see muslimov & harding 2003 ) .
one can estimate the width of the slot gap as defined by the magnetic colatitude where the variation of the curvature radiation pff becomes comparable to a fraction @xmath5 of the stellar radius , or [ sgwidth ] _ _ sg \ { lr 0.2 p_0.1(b_12)^-4/7i_45 ^ -3/7 .
[ deltaxi1 ] & b 0.1 b_cr + 0.1 p_0.1(b_12 ^ 3/4)^-4/7 i_45 ^ -3/7 & b > ~0.1 b_cr . where @xmath6 s , @xmath7 g , and @xmath8 , are the ns rotation period , surface magnetic field and moment of inertia .
the emission solid angle of radiation from the slot gap can be estimated by integrating over the thin annulus defined by the slot gap width ( eqn [ [ sgwidth ] ] ) .
[ omega ] _ _ 0 ^ 2 _ _ sg ster , _ _ . where @xmath9 is the dimensionless radius of emission and @xmath10 is the pc half - angle . based on the luminosity of the primary electrons and the above solid angle estimate
, we may derive the quantity , [ l / omega1 ] l _ ( _ ) = _ l_prim = 310 ^ 34 _
l_sd , 35 ^ 3/7 p_0.1 ^ 5/7 r_6 ^ 17/7 ( _ _ ) erg s^-1 ster ^-1 . where @xmath11 cm is the neutron star radius , @xmath12 is the radiation efficiency and @xmath13 is the spin - down luminosity .
the above expressions for @xmath14 are equivalent to the observed quantity @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the high - energy bolometric flux observed at the earth , and @xmath17 is the distance to the pulsar .
figure 2 shows the pulsar empirical ( solid circles with error bars ) and theoretical ( upside - down triangles ) values of @xmath18 as a function of spin - down luminosity , @xmath19 .
the theoretical values are calculated for the parameters @xmath20 and @xmath21 ( see eq .
[ [ l / omega1 ] ] ) .
note that parameter @xmath22 can range from 0.2 to 0.5 in cascade simulations , and @xmath23 . in figure 2
the dashed line represents the absolute upper limit , where the spin - down luminosity is radiated into the unit solid angle , i.e. where @xmath24 .
one can see that there is good agreement for most high - energy pulsars except several of the pulsars , geminga and psr b0656 + 14 , having low @xmath19 , and for j0218 + 4232 , which is a millisecond pulsar .
these pulsars are near or below the death line for pairs from curvature radiation ( see harding & muslimov 2002 , and next section ) , and therefore have either very wide slot gaps or no slot gaps at all .
all other high - energy pulsars depicted in figure 2 are above their curvature radiation death lines and are expected to have slot gaps .
in order to explore the characteristics of high - energy emission produced by particles accelerated in the slot gap , we have carried out monte carlo simulations of the pair cascades initiated by primary electrons accelerated by the @xmath25 in the gap .
these pair cascade simulations are based on those of daugherty & harding ( 1996 ) , but using the electric field of the slot gap ( see mulsimov & harding 2003 ) . to illustrate the features of the sg acceleration and cascades , we use the period ( @xmath26 ) and surface magnetic field ( @xmath27 ) of the crab pulsar for the case @xmath28 . a stellar radius of 16 km is assumed .
figure 3 shows examples of pulse profiles for different inclination angles @xmath29 and seen at various viewing angles @xmath30 to the rotation axis .
it is evident that widely spaced double - peaked profiles can result at relatively small inclination by slicing through the middle of the hollow cone .
profiles with two pulses separated by more than 100 degrees , as are seen from the crab , vela and geminga , can be formed when the inclination angle is comparable to the beam opening angle ( about 20 degrees in this model for the crab ) .
broad single pulses , as seen from psr b1509 - 58 , may be produced when the observer cuts along the edge of the cone .
as the inclination angle increases , the maximum pulse separation decreases and the pulses themselves also become narrower . bridge emission as seen in vela and geminga high - energy profiles ( and in the crab profile around 1 mev ) is not produced in this calculation since we have modeled only cascades and emission from the slot gap , which produces a pure hollow cone beam .
the core cascades will produce additional emission on field lines interior to the slot gap which will fill in the profile between the two pulses and produce bridge emission .
the revised picture of acceleration and radiation from pulsar slot gaps makes several observational predictions that seem to agree with some of the properties of the known high - energy pulsars . although the total luminosity produced by the slot gap is lower than that from the whole polar cap , the small solid angle of the slot gap allows for fluxes that are in agreement with those observed .
the opening angle of the high - energy emission beam from the slot gap is much larger than that of emission from near the neutron star surface .
this naturally allows for wider , double - peaked pulse profiles as observed in several @xmath0-ray pulsars .
however , this type of profile still requires small magnetic inclination angles that are comparable to the emission beam opening angle . even for the fast pulsars ,
the slot gap beam opening angles are only @xmath31 . applying this model to the observed @xmath0-ray pulsars
would therefore require that these , and probably most , pulsars have inclination angles smaller than @xmath32 and our viewing angle can not be much larger .
this may be problematic in light of the chandra x - ray image of the crab nebula ; if the plane of the torus is really orthogonal to the spin axis , then our viewing angle is @xmath33 .
however , a number of other , more recently discovered , young pulsars seem to have small magnetic inclination ( harding et al .
2003 ) and slot - gap radiation may be visible at x - ray and @xmath0-ray energies . | rotation - powered pulsars emission at x - ray-ray energies growing ( thompson 2001 becker aschenbach 2002 theory of pulsar acceleration high - energy emission studied for twenty - five years origin of pulsed non - thermal emission unsettled observations distinguish emission at magnetic poles 1996 outer magnetosphere 1986 2001 polar cap ) models energetics pair - cascade spectrum predicted beam size radiation near neutron star surface too small wide pulse profiles thompson arons ( 1983 ) noted possibility high - altitude acceleration region slot gap near pc rim pair formation front accelerating field occurs at higher altitude as magnetic colatitude approaches open field line electric field vanishes re - examined slot - gap model two new features acceleration due to inertial - frame dragging additional decrease in electric field near boundary edge polar cap due to narrowness slot gap enable acceleration to altitudes several stellar radii in slot gap angles around polar cap larger high - energy emission beam at smaller magnetic inclination angles necessary for widely spaced double - peaked pulse profilesspace - charge limited flow acceleration model arons scharlemann 1979 electrons emitted from neutron star surface near magnetic poles accelerated steady - state electrons achieve sufficient lorentz factor radiate curvature inverse compton photons electron - positron pairs in strong magnetic field positrons accelerate downward toward neutron star electrons accelerate upward pair polarization screens electric field above pair formation front pff models assume boundary condition accelerating electric field potential zero at last open field line near boundary larger distance required for electrons to accelerate to lorentz factor pff occurs at higher altitudes boundary pff curves upward infinity tangent to last open field line electric field screened above pff narrow slot conducting walls formed figure 1 electric field screened by second conducting boundary acceleration reduced rate pair production cascades not near neutron star surface pole at higher altitudes differences between revised slot - gap model original inclusion relativistic frame dragging enables particle acceleration on curved field lines all inclination angles radiation from pair cascades interior edge slot gapcascade radiation emission beam from slot gap full hollow cone centered on magnetic axis narrower emission beam from field lines to gap core component of pairs high - energy emission electrodynamics slot gap dependent on width @xmath1 ratio electric field in gap to core region is @xmath2 luminosity of particles accelerated @xmath3 @xmath4 spin - down luminosity of pulsar muslimov & harding 2003 estimate width slot gap by magnetic colatitude curvature radiation comparable to fraction @xmath5 stellar radius sgwidth 0.2 p_0.1(b_12)^-4/7i_45 -3/7 deltaxi1 0.1_cr p_0.1(b_12 -3/7 @xmath6 s @xmath7 g @xmath8 ns rotation period surface magnetic field moment of inertia emission solid angle of radiation from slot gap estimated by integrating over thin annulus slot gap width sgwidth @xmath9 is dimensionless radius of emission @xmath10 pc half - angle based on luminosity of primary electrons solid angle estimate derive quantity omega1_prim = 310 ^ 34 35 3/7 p_0.1 5/7 r_6 17/7@xmath11 neutron star radius @xmath12 radiation efficiency spin - down luminosity @xmath14 equivalent to observed quantity @xmath15 @xmath16 high - energy bolometric flux earth distance to pulsar figure 2 shows pulsar empirical theoretical values @xmath18 function spin - down luminosity @xmath19 theoretical values calculated for parameters @xmath20 @xmath21 parameter @xmath22 0.2 to 0.5 in cascade simulations @xmath23 dashed line represents upper limit spin - down luminosity radiated into unit solid angle @xmath24 good agreement for most high - energy pulsars except geminga b0656 + 14 low @xmath19 j0218 + 4232 millisecond pulsar pulsars near or below death line for pairs curvature radiation have wide slot gaps or no slot gaps other high - energy pulsars above curvature radiation death lines expected have slot gaps high - energy emission particles accelerated in slot gap monte carlo simulations pair cascades primary electrons accelerated by @xmath25 gap simulations based on daugherty & harding 1996 electric field slot gapsg acceleration cascades use period @xmath26 surface magnetic field @xmath27 crab pulsar case @xmath28 stellar radius 16 km assumed figure 3 shows pulse profiles inclination angles @xmath29 viewing angles @xmath30 rotation widely spaced double - peaked profiles result small inclination slicing hollow cone profiles pulses separated more 100 degrees crab vela geminga formed inclination angle comparable to beam opening angle 20 degrees crab broad single pulses psr b1509 - 58 produced observer cuts edge cone inclination angle increases pulse separation decreases pulses narrower emission in vela geminga high - energy profiles crab profile 1 mev not produced modeled cascades emission from slot gap hollow cone beam core cascades produce additional emission field lines slot gap fill profile pulses produce bridge emission revised picture acceleration radiation from pulsar slot gaps observational predictions agree with properties high - energy pulsars total luminosity slot gap lower polar cap small solid angle allows fluxes opening angle high - energy emission beam slot gap larger than emission neutron star surfaceallows double - peaked pulse profiles @xmath0-ray pulsars requires small magnetic inclination angles comparable emission beam opening angle fast pulsars slot gap beam opening angles @xmath31 applying model to @xmath0-ray pulsars inclination angles smaller than @xmath32 viewing angle larger problematic chandra x - ray image crab nebula plane torus orthogonal to spin axis viewing angle @xmath33 young pulsars small magnetic inclination harding et al . 2003 slot - gap radiation visible at x - ray @xmath0-ray energies | 0.358993 | 2,417 | 1,201 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,921 | original abstract the magic telescope observed in 2006 several vhe blazars in the course of multi - frequency campaigns , comprising measurements in the optical , x - ray and vhe regime . amongst others ,
the well - know tev blazar mrk 421 has been studied in detail .
magic detected mrk 421 each day of these campaigns with high significance , establishing once more flux variability on nightly scales for this object .
for certain nights , the integral flux exceeded the one of crab significantly .
the individual data sets have been examined for intra - night variability and were used to search for a correlation between the spectral index and the flux . in this contribution
, the results of the magic observations of different blazars will be presented in detail . in 2006
the magic telescope observed the well known very high energy ( vhe , @xmath080gev ) blazars mrk421 and mrk501 in the course of multi - wavelength campaigns , comprising measurements in the optical , x - ray and vhe regime .
magic performed additional snapshot observations on mrk421 around the mwl campaigns and detected the source each night with high significance , establishing once more flux variability on nightly scales for this object . for certain nights ,
the integral flux exceeded the one of crab significantly , whereas the truly simultaneous observations have been conducted in a rather low flux state .
the magic observations contemporaneous to _ xmm - newton _ revealed clear intra - night variability .
no significant correlation between the spectral index and the flux could be found for the nine days of observations .
the vhe observations of mrk501 have been conducted during one of the lowest flux states ever measured by magic for this object .
the vhe and optical light curves do not show significant variability , whereas the flux in x - rays increased by about 50% . in this contribution
, the results of the magic observations will be presented in detail .
vhe mwl blazar | blazars are radio - loud active galactic nuclei ( agn ) viewed at small angles between the jet axis and the line of sight . due to relativistic beaming
, they are the brightest and most variable high energy sources among agns . bl lacertae objects , a subclass of blazars @xcite ,
are completely dominated by nonthermal emission and show only faint or no emission lines at all .
their spectral energy distribution ( sed ) extends over more than 15 orders of magnitude and exhibits two pronounced peaks when plotted as @xmath1 versus @xmath2 .
high - peaked bl lacertae objects ( hbls ) are characterized by the first peak being located in the uv to x - ray range , whereas the second peak appears at @xmath3-ray energies ( gev to tev ) .
the non - thermal , beamed emission detected from hbls is commonly ascribed to synchrotron and inverse - compton radiation from ultrarelativistic charged particles , accelerated at shocks in jets moving with relativistic bulk speed .
progress in understanding the roles of shocks and plasma turbulence for particle acceleration and the interplay with the dynamics of the jet expansion is expected from modelling the sed of blazars . at present , it is unclear whether the observed emission is entirely due to accelerated electrons , as in synchrotron - self - compton ( ssc ) models ( e.g. @xcite , @xcite , @xcite ) , or whether the high - energy emission is due to pions produced by accelerated protons and ions and subsequent pion decay ( e.g. @xcite , @xcite ) .
owing to their strong spectral and flux variability at all wavebands down to minutes ( see e.g. @xcite ) , simultaneous multi - wavelength ( mwl ) campaigns are essential to study the sed of hbls . of paramount importance are hereby the x - ray and @xmath3-ray regimes , where the two sed peaks are located for hbls . in former mwl campaigns ,
the minimum time scale of truly simultaneous observations was restricted by the low sensitivity of the participating vhe telescopes , enabling the investigation of transient events only in high flux states . with the advent of a new generation of imaging atmospheric cherenkov telescopes with improved sensitivity and lowered energy threshold such as magic , h.e.s.s . and veritas ,
the detection of hbls in a few hours becomes feasible also during low flux states . in this proceedings we present magic ( @xcite , @xcite ) observations of the well - known tev blazars mrk421 and mrk501 in 2006 .
for individual nights , these were conducted ( quasi-)simultaneously with h.e.s.s .
@xcite , suzaku @xcite , _ xmm - newton _
@xcite , integral @xcite and kva @xcite .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] the number * _ nnnn _ * can be found from the conference web page after login as participant ( http://icrc2009.uni.lodz.pl/ ) .
this is the i d number of the submitted abstract converted to four ( 4 ) digits ( e.g. , the paper corresponding to the abstract number 23 translates into icrc0023.pdf ) .
+ these files must be archived to a * single compressed file * for submission in gzipped tar or zipped format .
the archive should be named according to the scheme : + * _ icrcnnnn_bw.tar.gz _ * or * _ icrcnnnn_bw.zip _ * , + where * _ bw _ * denotes black white version .
+ if you prefer to have your paper on cd rom in colour , you should prepare also additional coloured version of your figures and pdf file of the paper , and send us two archives : one with black - white files ( for printed version of proceedings ) and the second one with files in colour ( for pre - conference cd rom ) .
both archives should be constructed as described above . + the archive with coloured version should be named according to the scheme : * _ icrcnnnn_colour.tar.gz _ * or * _
icrcnnnn_colour.zip_*. + if version in colour will not be submitted , then automatically black white version of the paper will be included in the cd rom .
before submitting the final version of the paper please remember to : + * manually equalize the lengths of the two columns on the last page of your paper ( see @xcite ) . *
+ please send the files + * _ icrcnnnn_bw.tar.gz _ * or * _ icrcnnnn_bw.zip _ * + ( or additionally + * _ icrcnnnn_colour.tar.gz _ * or * _ icrcnnnn_colour.zip _ * ) + as e
mail attachment to : + + ( please note the difference of addresses and do not send files to icrc2009@uni.lodz.pl . ) + the subject of e - mail should contain the name of the author presenting the paper and the i d number of corresponding abstract . +
examples of figures : simple ( fig . [ simp_fig ] ) , double column using two subfigures ( fig . [ double_fig ] ) , and double column using one big figure ( fig . [ wide_fig ] ) table [ table_simple ] is an example of a simple table . note that footnotes inside tables must be created by a pair of commands : ` \footnotemark ` inside ` table ` enviroment and ` \footnotetext{text } ` outside it .
command ` \footnote ` has no effect .
example of itemized list : * d the name of the city * d example of itemized list with castomized labels : * d * d example of enumerated list : 1 . lotnisko airport 2 .
bus 175 from airport to warsaw train station example of list with sublists : * dzie dobry
good morning * * dziekuj thanks * * prosz here you are ; please * do widzenia good bye * dobranoc good night * instytut prawa law department ( icrc host ) 1 .
d fabryczna
train station from / to warsaw 2 .
warszawa centralna
train station in warsaw * instytut fizyki
institute of physics one can use ieee list style , i.e. ` \begin{itemize } ` ` [ \ieeesetlabelwidth{z } ] ` , but it is not necessary .
footnotes can be created with the ` \footnote ` + ` { this is footnote } ` command .
equation [ simp_eqn ] is an example of a simple equation @xmath4 an example of multilines equation , with lines numbered or not : @xmath5 the array environment can be used for expression of the following type : @xmath6 when you find not correct hyphenation or you would like to force latex to split the word , then place the word with suggested hyphenation in the list of ` \hyphenation ` command which is before the title of the paper in the source _
template.tex _ file .
e.g. abcdefghijklmnoprstuwxyz .
do not use ` \bibtex ` .
as a base of 31@xmath7 icrc proceedings we decided to use ieee latex style , _ ieeetran _ version v1.7a .
usage of it is described in @xcite in details ( we include it with this template package ) .
99 m. shell , _ how to use the ieeetran latex class _ http://tug.ctan.org/get/macros/latex/contrib/ieeetran/ieeetran_howto.pdf t. oetiker h. partl , i. hyna , e. schlegl , _ a ( not so ) short introduction to latex2e _ http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/lshort/ | blazars are radio - loud active galactic nuclei viewed small angles between jet axis line sight relativistic beaming brightest variable high energy sources among bl lacertae objects subclass of blazars @xcite dominated by nonthermal emission show faint or no emission lines spectral energy distribution extends over 15 orders of magnitude two peaks @xmath1 versus @xmath2 high - peaked bl lacertae objects first peak in uv to x - ray range second peak at @xmath3-ray energies non - thermal emission from hbls ascribed to synchrotron inverse - compton radiation from ultrarelativistic charged particles accelerated at shocks in jets progress in understanding roles shocks plasma turbulence for particle acceleration jet expansion expected modelling sed of blazars unclear emission due to accelerated electrons or due to accelerated protons ions pion decay strong spectral flux variability at wavebands multi - wavelength campaigns essential to study sed of hblsx - ray @xmath3-ray regimes two sed peaks for hbls former mwl campaigns minimum time scale simultaneous observations restricted by low sensitivity vhe telescopes events high flux states new generation imaging atmospheric cherenkov telescopes improved sensitivity lowered energy threshold magic detection of hbls in hours feasible during low flux states present magic @xcite observations of tev blazars mrk421 mrk501 in 2006 conducted quasi-)simultaneously with h.e.s.s . @xcite suzaku @xcite xmm - newton @xcite integral @xcite kva @xcite number nnnn _ found conference web page after login http://icrc2009.uni.lodz.pl i d number of submitted abstract converted to four digits paper abstract number 23 translates icrc0023.pdf files archived to single compressed file in gzipped tar or zipped format archive named icrcnnnn_bw.tar.gz or icrcnnnn_bw.zip bw denotes black white versionif prefer paper on cd rom in colour prepare additional coloured version of figures pdf file send two archives one with black - white files for printed proceedings second with files colour for pre - conference cd rom both archives constructed as described above archive with coloured version named according to scheme icrcnnnn_colour.tar.gz or icrcnnnn_colour.zip if version colour not submitted black white version included in cd rom before submitting final version equalize lengths of two columns on last page send files icrcnnnn_bw.tar.gz or.zip or icrcnnnn_colour.tar.gz.zip as e mail attachment to note difference of addresses not send files to icrc2009@uni.lodz.pl subject of e - mail contain name of author presenting i d number of corresponding abstract examples of figures : simple_fig double column using two subfigures one big figure wide table [ table_simple ] example simple table footnotes inside tables created by pair commands : ` \footnotemark ` inside table \footnotetext outside command ` \footnote ` has no effectitemized list name city castomized labels enumerated list 1 lotnisko airport bus 175 airport to warsaw train station list sublists : dzie dobry good morning dziekuj thanks do widzenia good bye dobranoc good night instytut prawa law department icrc host ) fabryczna train station warsaw 2 warszawa centralna train station instytut fizyki institute physics use ieee list style \begin{itemize }\ieeesetlabelwidth{z } not necessary footnotes created \footnote ` + command equation simp_eqn ] simple equation multilines equation lines numbered not @xmath5 array environment expression type @xmath6 correct hyphenation force latex split word place word suggested hyphenation \hyphenation ` command before title paper source template.tex e abcdefghijklmnoprstuwxyz not use \bibtex ` base 31@xmath7 icrc proceedings ieee latex style ieeetran version v1.7a described @xcite details template package shell use ieeetran latex class http://tug.ctan.org/get/macros/latex/contrib/ieeetran_howto.pdf t. oetiker h. partlhyna schlegl introduction latex2e http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/lshort | 0.3104 | 1,735 | 866 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,926 | in this note , we provide the generalization of the trace inequality derived in @xcite . more precisely , we prove that @xmath0 \right\ } \geq 0 $ ] , for arbitrary @xmath1 where @xmath2 denotes the matrix trace operator , @xmath3 , @xmath4 are any positive definite matrices and @xmath5 , @xmath6 , for all @xmath7 , are any positive semidefinite matrices . | trace inequalities are useful in many areas such as the multiple input multiple output ( mimo ) systems in control theory and communications .
the trace inequality derived in this paper is used to prove the sufficient condition that guarantees the uniqueness of a nash equilibrium in certain mimo communications games with @xmath8 players ( see @xcite for details ) . to be more specific , the diagonally strict concavity condition of rosen @xcite is proven to be satisfied in the scenario of @xcite .
the trace inequality under discussion has already been proven in two special cases : in @xcite for @xmath9 and in @xcite for @xmath10 . in what follows
, we will provide the proof for the general case where @xmath1 is arbitrary .
[ lemma_k ] let @xmath11 be a strictly positive integer , @xmath3 , @xmath4 be any positive definite matrices and @xmath12 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 be any positive semidefinite matrices . then @xmath13 \right\ } \geq 0,\ ] ] where @xmath2 denotes the matrix trace operator .
in order to prove theorem [ lemma_k ] , we will use the following auxiliary results .
@xcite [ lemma_3 ] let @xmath14 , @xmath15 be two positive definite matrices and @xmath16 , @xmath17 be two positive semidefinite matrices and @xmath18 a hermitian matrix .
then @xmath19 the proof can be found in @xcite .
[ lemma_4 ] let @xmath14 , @xmath15 be two positive definite matrices , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , two positive semi - definite matrices .
then @xmath20 to prove this result , let us define @xmath21 as follows : @xmath22\right\}\ ] ] we observe that @xmath21 can be written in two different ways : @xmath23({\mathbf}{a}+{\mathbf}{c})^{-1}\right\ } \\ & = & \mathrm{tr } \left\{({\mathbf}{c}-{\mathbf}{d})({\mathbf}{b}+{\mathbf}{d})^{-1}({\mathbf}{c}-{\mathbf}{d})({\mathbf}{a}+{\mathbf}{c})^{-1}\right\ } + \\ & & \mathrm{tr } \left\{({\mathbf}{c}-{\mathbf}{d})({\mathbf}{b}+{\mathbf}{d})^{-1}({\mathbf}{a}-{\mathbf}{b})({\mathbf}{a}+{\mathbf}{c})^{-1}\right\ } , \end{array}\ ] ] and @xmath24({\mathbf}{b}+{\mathbf}{d})^{-1}\right\ } \\ & = & \mathrm{tr } \left\{({\mathbf}{c}-{\mathbf}{d})({\mathbf}{a}+{\mathbf}{c})^{-1}({\mathbf}{c}-{\mathbf}{d})({\mathbf}{b}+{\mathbf}{d})^{-1}\right\ } + \\ & & \mathrm{tr } \left\{({\mathbf}{c}-{\mathbf}{d})({\mathbf}{a}+{\mathbf}{c})^{-1}({\mathbf}{a}-{\mathbf}{b})({\mathbf}{b}+{\mathbf}{d})^{-1}\right\}. \end{array}\ ] ] using this fact and the commutative property of the trace of a matrix product , the desired result follows directly .
the only thing left to be proven is that @xmath21 is real . to this end , if we denote by @xmath25 , we observe that @xmath26 .
therefore , we obtain that @xmath27 and also @xmath28 .
define , for all @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
notice that @xmath32 and @xmath33 are positive definite matrices .
we observe that @xmath34 can be re - written recursively as follows : @xmath35 we proceed in two steps .
first , we find a lower bound for @xmath34 and then we prove that this bound is positive .
we start by proving that , for all @xmath1 : @xmath36 to this end we proceed by induction on @xmath11 .
for all @xmath1 , define the proposition : @xmath37 it is easy to check that , for @xmath9 , @xmath38 is true : @xmath39 now , let us assume that @xmath40 is true and prove that @xmath41 is also true .
we have that : the last step of the proof of theorem [ lemma_k ] reduces to showing that the term on the right side of the equality ( c ) is positive .
this can be easily checked by observing that all the terms of the form @xmath47 , with @xmath18 a hermitian matrix , @xmath14 and @xmath15 two positive definite matrices , can be re - written as @xmath48 with @xmath49 .
thus , for all @xmath8 , @xmath50 and the desired result has been proven .
e. v. belmega , s. lasaulce , and m. debbah , `` a trace inequality for positive definite matrices '' , _ journal of inequalities in pure and applied mathematics ( jipam ) _ , vol .
1 , article 5 , pp . 14 , ( 2009 ) .
e. v. belmega , s. lasaulce , m. debbah , m. jungers , and j. dumont , `` power allocation games in wireless networks of multi - antenna terminals '' , _
springer telecommunications systems journal , valuetools special issue _ , issn 1018 - 4864 ( print ) 1572 - 9451 ( online ) , doi 10.1007/s11235 - 010 - 9305 - 3 , ( 2010 ) .
j. rosen , `` existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n - person games '' , _ econometrica _ , vol .
33 , pp . 520534 , ( 1965 ) .
k. m. abadir and j. r. magnus , `` matrix algebra '' , _ cambridge university press , new york , usa _ , pp . 329 , pp . 338 , ( 2005 ) . | trace inequalities useful in multiple input output mimo systems control theory communications trace inequality in paper sufficient condition uniqueness nash equilibrium in mimo communications games with @xmath8 players see @xcite details diagonally strict concavity condition of rosen @xcite proven satisfied in scenario @xcite trace inequality proven in two special cases @xmath9 @xmath10 for general case where @xmath1 arbitrary @xmath11 positive integer @xmath3 @xmath4 positive definite matrices @xmath12 @xmath5 @xmath6 positive semidefinite matrices @xmath13 @xmath2 denotes matrix trace operator prove theorem use auxiliary results @xmath14 @xmath15 positive definite matrices positive semidefinite matrices @xmath18 hermitian matrix @xmath19 proof in @xcite @xmath14 @xmath15 positive definite matrices @xmath16 @xmath17 positive semi - definite matrices@xmath20 prove result define @xmath21 @xmath22\right @xmath21 written two @xmath23({\mathbf}{a}+{\mathbf}{c}){-1}\right{\mathbf}{c}-{\mathbf}{d{b}+{}{d}){-1}{}{c}{}{d{a}+{\mathbf}{c}){-1}\right{\mathbf}{c}{\mathbf}{d{b}+{}{d}{\mathbf}{b}{a}+{\mathbf}{c}{-1}\right @xmath24({\mathbf}{b}+{\mathbf}{d})^{-1}\right{\mathbf}{c}{\mathbf}{d{a}+{}{c}{}{c}{}{d}{b}+{\mathbf}{d}){-1}\right{\mathbf}{c}{}{d{a}+{\mathbf}{c}{-1}{\mathbf}{a}-{\mathbf}{b{\mathbf}{b}+{\mathbf}{d})^{-1}\right\}. \end{array} using fact commutative property trace matrix product desired result follows @xmath21 real denote @xmath25 observe @xmath26 obtain @xmath27 @xmath28 define @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 positive definite matrices @xmath34 re - written recursively @xmath35 proceed two steps find lower bound for @xmath34 prove bound positive proving @xmath1 : @xmath36 proceed induction on @xmath11 @xmath1 define proposition : @xmath37 check @xmath9 @xmath38 true @xmath39 assume @xmath40 true prove @xmath41 true last step proof of theorem lemma_k term right side equality ( c ) positive terms form @xmath47 @xmath18 matrix @xmath14 @xmath15 positive definite matrices re - written as @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath8 @xmath50 desired result proven e. v. belmega s. lasaulce m.debbah trace inequality positive matrices journal inequalities mathematics vol . 1 article 5 pp 14 2009 belmega lasaulce debbah jungers dumont power allocation games wireless networks multi - antenna terminals springer systems journal valuetools special issue issn 1018 - 4864 1572 - 9451 online doi 10.1007/s11235 - 010 - 9305 - 2010 j rosen equilibrium points concave n - person games vol . 33 pp 520534 1965 abadir r magnus matrix algebra cambridge university press new york pp 329 338 2005 | 0.259403 | 1,439 | 788 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,946 | for a graph @xmath0 , its @xmath1th power is constructed by placing an edge between two vertices if they are within distance @xmath1 of each other . in this note
we study the amount of edges added to a graph by taking its @xmath1th power . in particular we obtain that either the @xmath1th power is complete or
many " new edges are added .
this is an extension of a result obtained by p. hegarty for cubes of graphs . | this note addresses some questions raised by p. hegarty in @xcite . in that paper
he studied results about graphs inspired by the cauchy - davenport theorem .
all graphs in this paper are simple and loopless . for two vertices @xmath2 , denote the length of the shortest path between them by @xmath3 . for @xmath4 , define its _ ith neighborhood _ as @xmath5 .
the @xmath1th power of a graph @xmath0 , denoted @xmath6 , is constructed from @xmath0 by adding an edge between two vertices @xmath7 and @xmath8 when they are within distance @xmath1 in @xmath0 .
define the diameter of @xmath0 , @xmath9 , as the minimal @xmath1 such that @xmath6 is complete ( alternatively , the maximal distance between two vertices ) .
denote the number of edges of @xmath0 by @xmath10 . for @xmath4 and a set of vertices @xmath11 ,
define @xmath12 .
the cayley graph of a subset @xmath13 is constructed on the vertex set @xmath14 . for two distinct vertices
@xmath15 , we define @xmath16 to be an edge whenever @xmath17 or @xmath18 .
the following is a consequence of the cauchy - davenport theorem ( usually stated in the language of additive number theory @xcite ) .
[ thm : cauchydavenport ] let @xmath19 be a prime , @xmath20 a subset of @xmath14 , and @xmath0 the cayley graph of @xmath20 .
then for any integer @xmath21 : @xmath22 if we take @xmath20 to be the arithmetic progression @xmath23 , then equality holds in this theorem for all @xmath24 .
we might look for analogues of theorem [ thm : cauchydavenport ] for more general graphs @xmath0 .
in particular since these cayley graphs are always regular and ( when @xmath19 is prime ) connected , we might focus on regular , connected @xmath0 . in @xcite hegarty proved the following theorem : [ thm : hegarty ] suppose @xmath0 is a regular , connected graph with @xmath25 .
then we have @xmath26 with @xmath27 in other words , the cube of @xmath0 retains the original edges of @xmath0 and gains a positive proportion of new ones . in section 3
we prove this theorem with an improved constant of @xmath28 .
the requirement of regularity can not be easily dropped , as shown in @xcite .
theorem [ thm : hegarty ] leads to the question of how the growth behaves for other powers of the @xmath0 . note that theorem [ thm : hegarty ]
can not be used recursively to obtain such a result since the cube of a regular graph is not necessarily regular . in @xcite
it was shown that no equivalent of theorem [ thm : hegarty ] exists with @xmath29 replaced by @xmath30 , and it was asked what happens for higher powers . in this note
we address that question .
we prove the following theorem : [ thm : higherpowers ] suppose @xmath0 is a regular , connected graph , and @xmath31 .
then we have : @xmath32 let the degree of each vertex be @xmath33 .
fix some @xmath34 with @xmath35 nonempty .
consider any vertex @xmath36 .
then for any @xmath37 satisfying @xmath38 , there is a @xmath39 such that @xmath40 .
for such a @xmath41 , all vertices @xmath42 have @xmath43 .
all such @xmath7 are contained in @xmath44 , hence @xmath45 note that each @xmath46 satisfies @xmath47 . summing the bound ( [ eq : bound ] ) over all these @xmath37 , noting that any edge is counted at most once , we obtain @xmath48
now we sum this over all @xmath49 .
note that since the edges counted above go from some @xmath50 to @xmath51 with @xmath52 , each edge is counted at most once .
also we havent yet counted any of the original edges of @xmath0 , so we might as well add them .
hence @xmath53 obviously there was nothing particularly special about @xmath34 .
we can get a similar expresssion using @xmath54 , namely @xmath55 averaging ( [ eq : vsum ] ) and ( [ eq : vsum2 ] ) we get @xmath56 note that for any @xmath57 we have @xmath58 this is because @xmath59 . putting the bound ( [ eq : sumbound ] ) into the sum ( [ eq : vsumaverage ] ) we obtain @xmath60 thus the theorem is proven .
note that for @xmath61 the bounds in theorem [ thm : higherpowers ] are trivial .
in particular it says nothing about the increase in the number of edges of the cube of a regular , connected graph .
such an increase was already demonstrated by hegarty in theorem [ thm : hegarty ] .
here we give an alternative proof of that theorem , yielding a slightly better constant .
[ thm : improvedhegarty ] suppose @xmath0 is a regular , connected graph with @xmath62
. then we have @xmath63 let the degree of each vertex be @xmath33 .
note that as @xmath0 is regular , and not complete , every @xmath4 will have a non - neighbour in @xmath0 .
together with connectedness this implies that each @xmath4 has at least one new neighbour in @xmath30 .
this implies the theorem for @xmath64 . for the remainder of the proof , we assume that @xmath65 .
the proof rests on the following colouring of the edges of @xmath0 : for an edge @xmath66 in @xmath0 , colour @xmath67 notice that if @xmath66 is a blue edge , then there are at least @xmath68 neighbours of @xmath69 in @xmath30 .
this is because @xmath69 will be connected to everything in @xmath70 except itself , and @xmath71 for @xmath66 blue . if , in addition , we have some @xmath7 connected to @xmath69 by an edge ( of any colour ) , then @xmath7 will be at distance at most @xmath72 from everything in @xmath73 . hence @xmath7 will have at least @xmath68 neighbours in @xmath29 .
+ partition the vertices of @xmath0 as follows : @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 + by the above argument , if @xmath34 is in @xmath77 , then @xmath78 . recall that each @xmath79 will have at least one new neighbour in @xmath30 , giving @xmath80 .
summing these two bounds over all vertices in @xmath0 , noting that any edge is counted twice , gives @xmath81 recall that we are considering the case when @xmath65 .
thus to prove that @xmath82 , it suffices to show that @xmath83 . to this end
we shall demonstrate that @xmath84 .
first however we need a proposition helping us to find blue edges in @xmath0 .
[ cliqueproposition ] for any @xmath4 there is some @xmath85 such that @xmath86 .
. then there are vertices @xmath7 and @xmath8 such that @xmath88 forms a path between @xmath69 and @xmath34 .
we will show that one of the edges @xmath89 , @xmath16 or @xmath90 is blue .
this will prove the proposition assuming that there are _ any _ blue edges to begin with .
however , it also shows the existence of blue edges because @xmath25 .
so , suppose that the edges @xmath89 and @xmath91 are red . then we have @xmath92 , and @xmath93 . using this and @xmath94 gives @xmath95 therefore @xmath96 . hence @xmath16 is blue , proving the proposition
now we will show that @xmath84 .
suppose @xmath97 . by the definition of @xmath98 , there is a @xmath99 such that @xmath100 is an edge .
this edge is neccesarily red as @xmath101 . using @xmath102,we have @xmath103 .
hence @xmath104 .
proposition [ cliqueproposition ] implies that there is some @xmath97 such that @xmath105 is an edge .
since @xmath105 is red , we have @xmath106 . using this
, the fact that @xmath107 , and ( [ eq : upperbound ] ) , gives @xmath108 double - counting the edges between @xmath11 and @xmath98 using the bounds ( [ eq : upperbound ] ) and ( [ eq : lowerbound ] ) gives a contradiction unless @xmath109 .
therefore @xmath110 as required .
theorem [ thm : higherpowers ] answers the question of giving a lower bound on the number of edges that are gained by taking higher powers of a graph .
we obtain growth that is linear with @xmath1 just as in theorem [ thm : cauchydavenport ] .
* the constant @xmath111 in theorem [ thm : higherpowers ] can not be improved to something of the form @xmath112 with @xmath113 . to see and consider the following sequence of graphs @xmath114
as @xmath33 tends to infinity : + take disjoint sets of vertices @xmath115 , with @xmath116 if @xmath117 and @xmath118 otherwise .
add all the edges within each set and also between neighboring ones .
so if @xmath119 , @xmath120 , then @xmath66 is an edge whenever @xmath121 ( see figure [ fig : img1 ] ) .
+ .,width=377 ] + the number of edges in @xmath114 is at least the number of edges in the larger classes which is @xmath122 .
+ the @xmath1th power @xmath123 has less than @xmath124 edges which is less than @xmath125
. therefore , @xmath126 + the graphs @xmath114 are not regular , but if @xmath127 , it is possible to remove a small ( less than @xmath128 ) number of edges from the graphs and make them @xmath33-regular without losing connectedness ( any cycle passing through all the vertices in @xmath129 would work ) . call these new graphs @xmath130 . by the same argument as before we have @xmath131 +
if @xmath132 , a similar trick can be performed , but we d need to start with @xmath116 if @xmath133 and @xmath118 otherwise .
+ so the factor of @xmath134 can not be improved for regular graphs .
all these examples are inspired by one given in @xcite to show that for any @xmath135 there are regular graphs @xmath0 with @xmath136 .
* despite the above example , there is certainly room for further improvement in theorems [ thm : higherpowers ] and [ thm : improvedhegarty ]
. in particular , theorem [ thm : improvedhegarty ] does nt seem tight in any way .
the graphs @xmath130 seem to give essentially the slowest possible growth for _ all _ powers of regular graphs . considering the graphs @xmath137 leads to the conjecture of @xmath138 for @xmath0 regular , connected , and @xmath25 . +
a shortcoming of theorem [ thm : higherpowers ] is that it only gives a good bound if the diameter of @xmath0 is close to @xmath1 .
when this is not the case , the number of edges in @xmath6 seems to grow faster . it would be interesting to obtain a good lower bound on @xmath139 involving both @xmath1 and @xmath9 .
* all the questions from this paper and @xcite could be asked for directed graphs .
in particular one can define directed cayley graphs for a set @xmath13 by letting @xmath16 be a directed edge whenever @xmath140 .
then the cauchy - davenport theorem implies an identical version of theorem [ thm : cauchydavenport ] for directed cayley graphs . in this setting
it is easy to show that there is growth even for the square of an out - regular oriented graph @xmath141 ( a directed graph where for a pair of vertices @xmath69 and @xmath34 , @xmath66 and @xmath142 are not both edges ) . in particular , we have @xmath143 this occurs because every vertex @xmath34 has @xmath144 in an out - regular oriented graph
. it s easy to see that this is best possible for such graphs .
one can construct out - regular oriented graphs with an arbitrarily large proportion of vertices @xmath34 satisfying @xmath145 .
+ however if we insist on _ both _ in and out - degrees to be constant , ( 8) no longer seems tight .
such graphs are always eulerian . in @xcite
there is a conjecture attributed to jackson and seymour that if an oriented graph @xmath141 is eulerian , then @xmath146 holds .
if this conjecture were proved , it would be an actual generalization of the directed version of theorem [ thm : cauchydavenport ] , as opposed to the mere analogues proved above .
i would like to thank my supervisors jan van den heuvel , and jozef skokan for much helpful advice and remarks . | note addresses questions hegarty @xcite studied graphs cauchy - davenport theorem graphs simple loopless two vertices @xmath2 denote shortest path by @xmath3 @xmath4 define @xmath5 @xmath1th power graph @xmath0 constructed from @xmath0 adding edge between vertices @xmath7 @xmath8 within distance define diameter of @xmath0 as minimal @xmath1 maximal distance between vertices denote number of edges @xmath0 by @xmath10 @xmath4 vertices @xmath11 define @xmath12 cayley graph of subset @xmath13 constructed on vertex @xmath14 two vertices @xmath15 define @xmath16 edge @xmath17 or @xmath18 consequence of cauchy - davenport theorem additive number theory @xmath19 prime @xmath20 subset of @xmath14 @xmath0 cayley graph of @xmath20 integer @xmath21 : @xmath22 @xmath20 arithmetic progression @xmath23 equality holds for @xmath24 look for analogues for general graphs @xmath0cayley graphs regular @xmath19 prime connected focus on regular @xmath0 @xcite hegarty proved theorem suppose @xmath0 regular connected graph with @xmath25 @xmath26 with @xmath27 cube of @xmath0 retains original edges gains positive proportion new ones section 3 prove theorem with improved constant @xmath28 requirement regularity not dropped leads question growth for other powers of @xmath0 theorem not used recursively cube regular graph not necessarily regular no equivalent of exists with @xmath29 replaced by @xmath30 asked what happens for higher powers note address question prove theorem suppose @xmath0 regular connected graph @xmath31 @xmath32 degree each vertex be @xmath33 fix @xmath34 with @xmath35 nonempty consider vertex @xmath36 @xmath37 satisfying @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 all vertices @xmath42 have @xmath43 @xmath7 in @xmath44 @xmath45 each @xmath46 satisfies @xmath47summing bound over @xmath37 any edge counted once obtain @xmath48 sum over @xmath49 edges counted from @xmath50 to @xmath51 with @xmath52 each edge counted once counted original edges of @xmath0 add them hence @xmath53 nothing special about @xmath34 similar expresssion using @xmath54 @xmath55 averaging vsum ] and vsum2 get @xmath56 @xmath57 have @xmath58 because @xmath59 putting bound sumbound into sum vsumaverage obtain @xmath60 theorem proven @xmath61 bounds in theorem trivial nothing about increase in number of edges of cube of regular connected graph increase demonstrated by hegarty in theorem alternative proof better constant suppose @xmath0 is regular connected graph with @xmath62 have @xmath63 degree of each vertex be @xmath33 @xmath0 regular not complete every @xmath4 non - neighbour in @xmath0 implies each @xmath4 has one new neighbour in @xmath30 implies theorem for @xmath64 remainder assume @xmath65 .proof colouring edges @xmath0 edge @xmath66 colour @xmath67 if @xmath66 blue edge @xmath68 neighbours @xmath69 in @xmath30 @xmath69 connected to @xmath70 except itself @xmath71 for @xmath66 blue if @xmath7 connected to @xmath69 edge @xmath7 @xmath72 from @xmath73 @xmath7 @xmath68 neighbours in @xmath29 partition vertices @xmath0 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 if @xmath34 in @xmath77 then @xmath78 each @xmath79 one new neighbour in @xmath30 @xmath80 summing two bounds over all vertices @xmath0 edge counted twice gives @xmath81 @xmath65 to prove @xmath82 show @xmath83 demonstrate @xmath84 need proposition find blue edges in @xmath0 @xmath4 @xmath85 @xmath86 vertices @xmath7 and @xmath8 @xmath88 path between @xmath69 and @xmath34 show edges @xmath89 @xmath16 or @xmath90 is blue proposition assuming blue edgesshows blue edges because @xmath25 suppose edges @xmath89 @xmath91 red have @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 gives @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath16 blue proving proposition show @xmath84 @xmath97 definition @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 edge edge red as @xmath101 using @xmath102 @xmath103 @xmath104 proposition implies @xmath97 @xmath105 edge @xmath105 red have @xmath106 @xmath107 upperbound gives @xmath108 double - counting edges between @xmath11 @xmath98 gives contradiction unless @xmath109 @xmath110 required theorem [ higherpowers ] answers lower bound on number edges gained taking higher powers graph obtain growth linear with @xmath1 constant @xmath111 theorem not improved form @xmath112 with @xmath113 sequence of graphs @xmath114 as @xmath33 tends to infinity take disjoint sets of vertices @xmath115 with @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 add edges within each set between neighboring onesif @xmath119 @xmath120 @xmath66 edge @xmath121 figure img1=377 edges in @xmath114 is larger classes @xmath122 @xmath1th power @xmath123 less than @xmath124 edges less than @xmath125 @xmath126 + graphs @xmath114 not regular @xmath127 possible to remove small less than @xmath128 edges from make @xmath33-regular without losing connectedness cycle vertices @xmath129 call new graphs @xmath130 same argument @xmath131 + if @xmath132 similar trick start with @xmath116 if @xmath133 @xmath118 factor of @xmath134 not improved for regular graphs examples inspired by @xmath135 regular graphs @xmath0 with @xmath136 room for improvement in theorems [ higherpowers ] improvedhegarty ] theorem improvedhegarty ] tight graphs @xmath130 slowest growth for powers regular graphs graphs @xmath137 conjecture of @xmath138 for @xmath0 regular connected @xmath25 shortcoming of theorem higherpowers ] gives good bound if diameter @xmath0 close to @xmath1not case edges in @xmath6 grow faster interesting obtain lower bound on @xmath139 involving @xmath1 and @xmath9 questions from paper @xcite asked for directed graphs define directed cayley graphs for @xmath13 @xmath16 directed edge @xmath140 cauchy - davenport theorem implies identical theorem for directed cayley graphs show growth for square of out - regular oriented graph @xmath141 vertices @xmath69 @xmath34 @xmath66 not both edges @xmath143 occurs vertex @xmath34 has @xmath144 in out - regular oriented graph best possible for graphs construct out - regular oriented graphs with large proportion vertices @xmath34 satisfying @xmath145 insist on in out - degrees constant ( 8) tight graphs always eulerian conjecture if oriented graph @xmath141 is eulerian @xmath146 holds if proved actual generalization of directed version theorem cauchydavenport analogues thank supervisors jan van den heuvel jozef skokan for helpful advice remarks | 0.434862 | 3,060 | 1,674 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,953 | to bracket the importance of the pre - equilibrium stage on relativistic heavy - ion collision observables , we compare simulations where it is modeled by either free - streaming partons or fluid dynamics .
these cases implement the assumptions of extremely weak vs. extremely strong coupling in the initial collision stage .
accounting for flow generated in the pre - equilibrium stage , we study the sensitivity of radial , elliptic and triangular flow on the switching time when the hydrodynamic description becomes valid . using the hybrid code iebe - vishnu @xcite
we perform a multi - parameter search , constrained by particle ratios , integrated elliptic and triangular charged hadron flow , the mean transverse momenta of pions , kaons and protons , and the second moment @xmath0 of the proton transverse momentum spectrum , to identify optimized values for the switching time @xmath1 from pre - equilibrium to hydrodynamics , the specific shear viscosity @xmath2 , the normalization factor of the temperature - dependent specific bulk viscosity @xmath3 , and the switching temperature @xmath4 from viscous hydrodynamics to the hadron cascade urqmd . with the optimized parameters , we predict and compare with experiment the @xmath5-distributions of @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 yields and their elliptic flow coefficients , focusing specifically on the mass - ordering of the elliptic flow for protons and lambda hyperons which is incorrectly described by vishnu without pre - equilibrium flow
. collective flow , pre - equilibrium dynamics , quark - gluon plasma , viscosity , model - to - data comparison , parameter optimization , uncertainty quantification | relativistic viscous hydrodynamics has become the workhorse of dynamical modeling of ultra - relativistic heavy - ion collisions .
however , hydrodynamics does not become valid until the medium has reached a certain degree of local momentum isotropization @xcite . in an inhomogeneous system , collective flow ( i.e. space - momentum correlations ) begins , however , to develop already before hydrodynamics becomes valid .
the hydrodynamic stage thus starts with a non - vanishing pre - equilibrium flow @xcite .
in @xcite we therefore performed a systematic study of pre - equilibrium flow effects on heavy - ion collision observables .
we here summarize the main results of this study and add a few recent results that go beyond the work reported in @xcite .
we assume longitudinal boost - invariance and model the approach towards local thermal equilibrium in a heavy - ion collision very simply @xcite as a pre - equilibrium stage of noninteracting free - streaming massless partonic degrees of freedom , separated by a switching time @xmath1 from a strongly coupled quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) stage in which frequent collisions isotropize the local momentum distribution sufficiently quickly that it can be described by viscous relativistic fluid dynamics .
the variable switching time @xmath1 parametrizes the duration of the thermalization process . for massless degrees of freedom
the evolution of the energy - momentum tensor during the free - streaming stage is independent of the initial transverse momentum distribution as long as it starts out locally azimuthally symmetric , and can be solved analytically @xcite . at @xmath1
we landau - match the analytically evolved pre - equilibrium energy - momentum tensor to viscous hydrodynamic form @xcite .
space - momentum correlations established by the free - streaming dynamics in the pre - equilibrium stage manifest themselves as non - zero initial values for the hydrodynamic flow velocity profiles , giving rise to non - zero initial radial and anisotropic flows .
local momentum anisotropies resulting from the free - streaming evolution of a spatially inhomogeneous initial density profile generate nonzero initial values for the shear stress . matching the traceless pre - equilibrium energy - momentum tensor of noninteracting massless degrees of freedom to a non - conformal , lattice qcd based equation of state @xcite at @xmath1 generates a non - zero initial bulk viscous pressure field in the hydrodynamic fluid .
all of these initial fields are then further evolved with the second - order viscous relativistic fluid dynamics code vish2 + 1 .
after hadronization of the qgp at a pseudocritical temperature @xmath12mev ( determined by the equation of state @xcite ) , the medium constituents are color neutral hadrons whose interactions are weaker than the gluon - mediated interactions in the earlier color - deconfined qgp , causing a rapid growth of their mean free paths and a subsequent breakdown of the fluid dynamic framework .
we therefore switch from vish2 + 1 to a microscopic description , using the hadron cascade code urqmd , on an isothermal switching surface of temperature @xmath4 which we here consider as an unknown parameter to be optimized by comparison with experimental data .
two additional important parameters affecting the evolution of collective flow and the @xmath5 distributions of the finally emitted hadrons are the shear and bulk viscosities during the liquid qgp stage . for simplicity
, we assume the qgp specific shear viscosity @xmath2 to be a temperature - independent , adjustable constant .
for the specific bulk viscosity @xmath13 , which is expected to develop a strong peak due to critical scattering close to the quark - hadron phase transition , we adopt the temperature - dependent parametrization given in@xcite ( which features a peak at @xmath14mev ) , but consider its normalization as a freely tunable parameter . in practice ,
peak values of @xmath13 exceeding 1 ( corresponding to bulk viscosity normalization factors @xmath15 ) cause the ( negative ) bulk viscous pressure to become very large near @xmath16 , leading to negative total pressures and mechanical instability of the medium against cavitation .
these physical instabilities also eventually render the hydrodynamic code numerically unstable .
we found in @xcite that an extended pre - equilibrium stage increases the final radial flow , leading to flatter @xmath5-spectra , while leaving the integrated charged hadron @xmath17 and @xmath18 almost unchanged unless @xmath1 significantly exceeds 2fm/@xmath19 .
bulk viscosity inhibits radial flow build - up , so the constraint from the measured @xmath5 distributions causes a strong positive correlation between @xmath1 and the bulk viscosity normalization factor . the experimental charged hadron elliptic flow constraint anticorrelates bulk and shear viscosity ; at low @xmath5 , the bulk viscous correction @xmath20 at @xmath4 acts as an effective positive chemical potential for massive hadrons @xcite , causing an anticorrelation between the bulk viscosity normalization factor and the chemical decoupling temperature @xmath4 .
distributions for pions , kaons and protons ( left ) , @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 ( middle ) , and the differential elliptic flows for @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( right ) from 400 hydrodynamic simulations with fluctuating initial conditions , each oversampled 400 times with urqmd to obtain sufficient particle statistics .
solid lines : full vishnu runs . dashed lines : pure hydro runs with immediate freeze - out at @xmath4 , without subsequent hadronic rescattering using urqmd . experimental data from alice @xcite .
[ fig1],title="fig : " ] + distributions for pions , kaons and protons ( left ) , @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 ( middle ) , and the differential elliptic flows for @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( right ) from 400 hydrodynamic simulations with fluctuating initial conditions , each oversampled 400 times with urqmd to obtain sufficient particle statistics .
solid lines : full vishnu runs .
dashed lines : pure hydro runs with immediate freeze - out at @xmath4 , without subsequent hadronic rescattering using urqmd . experimental data from alice @xcite .
[ fig1],title="fig : " ] distributions for pions , kaons and protons ( left ) , @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 ( middle ) , and the differential elliptic flows for @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( right ) from 400 hydrodynamic simulations with fluctuating initial conditions , each oversampled 400 times with urqmd to obtain sufficient particle statistics .
solid lines : full vishnu runs .
dashed lines : pure hydro runs with immediate freeze - out at @xmath4 , without subsequent hadronic rescattering using urqmd .
experimental data from alice @xcite .
[ fig1],title="fig : " ] distributions for pions , kaons and protons ( left ) , @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 ( middle ) , and the differential elliptic flows for @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( right ) from 400 hydrodynamic simulations with fluctuating initial conditions , each oversampled 400 times with urqmd to obtain sufficient particle statistics .
solid lines : full vishnu runs . dashed lines : pure hydro runs with immediate freeze - out at @xmath4 , without subsequent hadronic rescattering using urqmd . experimental data from alice @xcite .
[ fig1],title="fig : " ] these tendencies are illustrated in the top panel of fig .
[ fig1 ] for which we ran vishnu simulations with smooth ensemble - averaged mc - glauber initial conditions for 10 - 20% central pb - pb collisions at 2.76@xmath21gev for 1000 different quadruplets of the parameters listed in table [ t1 ] , calculated the experimental observables listed in the same table ( chosen for their insensitivity to initial - state event - by - event fluctuations ) , determined the @xmath22 for each quadruplet by comparing them with the experimental values , and then reconstructed the posterior likelihood distributions in the 4-dimensional parameter space using mcmc sampling @xcite .
for the set with the lowest @xmath22 , listed in the lower left panel of fig .
[ fig1 ] , we then ran 400 event - by - event vishnu simulations with fluctuating initial conditions , each oversampled 400 times in the urqmd stage for sufficient particle statistics , to predict the full transverse momentum distributions and their elliptic flows @xmath23 for the specific hadron species shown in the bottom row of fig .
[ fig1 ] .
._left : _ measured values of nine hadronic observables from 2.76@xmath21tev 1020% central pb+pb collisions used to constrain the model parameters listed on the right .
@xmath24 and @xmath0 are truncated means calculated from the data tables for the transverse momentum distributions listed in @xcite .
_ right : _ best - fit parameters and 95% confidence intervals ( c.i . ) using the results from markoff chain monte carlo sampling of the posterior parameter distribution shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( top ) .
[ t1 ] [ cols="<,^,^ " , ] to illustrate the effect of the microscopically simulated late hadronic rescattering stage on these observables we also added dashed lines illustrating their state at the end of the fluid stage at @xmath4 .
protons and @xmath9s experience a significant radial boost from urqmd , pushing their yields and elliptic flows to larger transverse momenta .
since @xmath9s in urqmd scatter with reduced cross sections relative to those of protons , this shift towards larger @xmath5 is weaker for @xmath9s than for protons ; as a result , the hydrodynamically predicted elliptic flow mass ordering between protons and @xmath9s at @xmath4 , clearly visible in the dashed lines in the lower right panel of fig .
[ fig1 ] and also in the experimental data @xcite , is basically eliminated after hadronic rescattering , although not inverted as previously observed in the vishnu model without pre - equilibrium dynamics @xcite . a shorter lifetime of the hadronic rescattering stage could help to keep this from happening . c. shen , z. qiu , h. song , j. bernhard , s. bass and u. heinz , comput .
commun .
* 199 * ( 2016 ) 61 .
u. heinz et al . , nucl .
a , in press [ arxiv:1509.05818 [ nucl - th ] ] .
p. f. kolb and r. rapp , phys .
c 67 ( 2003 ) 044903 ; p. f. kolb , http://www.bibliothek.iini-regensburg.de/opus/volltexte/2002/66/[phd thesis ] , universitt regensburg , 2002 .
w. broniowski , w. florkowski , m. chojnacki and a. kisiel , phys .
c 80 ( 2009 ) 034902 .
b. schenke , p. tribedy and r. venugopalan , phys .
lett . 108 ( 2012 ) 252301 .
w. van der schee , p. romatschke and s. pratt , phys .
lett . 111 ( 2013 ) 222302 .
p. romatschke , eur .
j. c 75 ( 2015 ) 429 . j. liu , c. shen and u. heinz , phys . rev .
c 91 ( 2015 ) 064906 .
a. bazavov et al .
[ hotqcd collaboration ] , phys .
d 90 ( 2014 ) 094503 .
g. s. denicol , t. kodama , t. koide and p. mota , phys .
c 80 ( 2009 ) 064901 .
r. preghenella [ alice collaboration ] , arxiv:1203.5904 [ hep - ex ] ; b. b. abelev et al .
[ alice collaboration ] , jhep 1506 ( 2015 ) 190 ; phys .
lett . 111 ( 2013 ) 222301 ; phys .
b 728 ( 2014 ) 216 .
k. dusling and t. schfer , phys .
c 85 ( 2012 ) 044909 . | relativistic viscous hydrodynamics workhorse modeling heavy - ion collisions valid until medium local momentum isotropization @xcite inhomogeneous system collective flow space - momentum correlations before hydrodynamics valid hydrodynamic stage starts with non - pre - equilibrium flow @xcite systematic study pre - equilibrium flow effects on heavy - ion collision observables summarize results recent results assume longitudinal boost - invariance model approach local thermal equilibrium in heavy - ion collision pre - equilibrium stage of noninteracting free - streaming massless partonic degrees freedom separated by switching time from quark - gluon plasma stage collisions isotropize local momentum distribution quickly variable switching time parametrizes duration thermalization massless evolution energy - momentum tensor independent of initial transverse momentum distribution locally symmetric solved analytically @xcite - match evolved pre - equilibrium energy - momentum tensor to viscous hydrodynamic form space - momentum correlations manifest as non - zero initial values hydrodynamic flow velocity profiles non - zero radial anisotropic flowsmomentum anisotropies evolution inhomogeneous density profile generate nonzero values shear stress pre - equilibrium energy - momentum tensor non - conformal lattice qcd equation state @xcite generates non - zero initial bulk viscous pressure field in hydrodynamic fluid fields evolved with second - order viscous relativistic fluid dynamics code vish2 + 1 after hadronization at pseudocritical temperature @xmath12mev medium constituents color neutral hadrons interactions weaker than gluon - mediated interactions qgp causing rapid growth paths breakdown fluid dynamic framework switch from vish2 + 1 to microscopic description hadron cascade code urqmd isothermal switching surface temperature @xmath4 unknown parameter parameters distributions shear bulk viscosities during liquid qgp stage qgp specific shear viscosity @xmath2 temperature - independent adjustable constant bulk viscosity @xmath13 strong peak due critical scattering quark - hadron phase transition adopt temperature - dependent parametrization@xcite peak at @xmath14mev normalization freely tunablepeak values @xmath13 1 bulk viscosity normalization factors cause negative bulk viscous pressure near @xmath16 negative pressures mechanical instability against cavitation instabilities render hydrodynamic code unstable extended pre - equilibrium stage increases radial flow flatter @xmath5-spectra charged hadron @xmath17 unchanged unless @xmath1 exceeds 2fm/@xmath19 bulk viscosity inhibits radial flow build - constraint @xmath5 distributions causes positive correlation between @xmath1 bulk viscosity normalization factor charged hadron elliptic flow constraint anticorrelates bulk viscosity low bulk viscous correction @xmath20 @xmath4 positive chemical potential for hadrons anticorrelation bulk viscosity normalization factor chemical decoupling temperature distributions for pions kaons protons @xmath9 differential elliptic flows @xmath6 from 400 hydrodynamic simulations oversampled 400 times full vishnu runs pure hydro runs freeze - out at @xmath4 without hadronic data from @xcitefig1] distributions for pions kaons protons differential elliptic flows @xmath6 from 400 hydrodynamic simulations fluctuating initial conditions oversampled 400 times urqmd particle statistics solid lines full vishnu runs dashed lines pure hydro runs immediate freeze - out at @xmath4 without hadronic rescattering urqmd experimental data from alice @xcite distributions pions kaons protons left differential elliptic flows 400 simulations fluctuating conditions oversampled 400 times urqmd statistics solid lines full vishnu runs dashed lines pure hydro runs immediate freeze - out at @xmath4 without hadronic rescattering urqmd experimental data from alice @xcite distributions pions kaons protons left differential elliptic flows @xmath6 right from 400 simulations fluctuating initial conditions each oversampled 400 times with urqmd particle statistics solid lines full vishnu runs dashed lines pure hydro runs immediate freeze - out at @xmath4 without hadronic rescattering urqmd experimental data from alice @xcitefig1] tendencies illustrated top panel fig . ran vishnu simulations smooth - averaged mc - glauber initial conditions 10 - 20% central pb - pb collisions at 2.76@xmath21gev 1000 quadruplets calculated experimental observables insensitivity initial fluctuations determined @xmath22 each quadruplet reconstructed posterior likelihood distributions 4-dimensional parameter space using mcmc sampling set lowest @xmath22 lower left panel ran 400 event vishnu simulations fluctuating initial conditions oversampled 400 times urqmd stage particle statistics predict full transverse momentum distributions elliptic flows @xmath23 specific hadron species bottom row fig. measured values nine hadronic observables from 2.76@xmath21tev 1020% central pb+pb collisions constrain model parameters @xmath24 @xmath0 truncated means calculated data tables transverse momentum distributions best - fit parameters 95% confidence intervals results markoff chain monte carlo sampling posterior parameter distribution fig . effect simulated late hadronic rescattering stage observables added dashed lines illustrating state end fluid stage at @xmath4protons @xmath9s experience radial boost from urqmd pushing yields flows to transverse momenta @xmath9s scatter reduced cross sections shift towards @xmath5 weaker for predicted elliptic flow mass ordering between protons @xmath9s at @xmath4 visible lines fig eliminated after hadronic rescattering shorter lifetime hadronic rescattering stage could c. shen z. qiu h song j. bernhard s. bass u. heinz comput . commun. 199 ( 2016 ) 61 heinz nucl. arxiv:1509.05818 p f. kolb r. rapp phys . c 67 ( 2003 ) 044903 kolb[phd thesis universitt regensburg 2002 broniowski florkowski chojnacki a. kisiel phys . c 80 ( 2009 ) 034902 b schenke p tribedy. venugopalan phys . lett . 108 ( 2012 ) 252301 van der schee p. romatschke s pratt phys . lett . 111 ( 2013 ) 22230275 2015 ) 429 liu shen heinz phys 91 2015 ) 064906 bazavov hotqcd collaboration . 90 2014 ) 094503 denicol kodama koide p mota 80 ( 2009 ) 064901 preghenella alice collaboration arxiv:1203.5904 hep abelev alice collaboration 1506 2015 ) 190 . 111 ( 2013 ) 222301 728 ( 2014 ) 216 dusling schfer 85 ( 2012 ) 044909 | 0.434427 | 2,821 | 1,402 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,967 | * in [ j. math .
phys .
51 ( 2010 ) 022104 ] a self - adjoint operator was introduced that has the property that it indicates the direction of time within the framework of standard quantum mechanics , in the sense that as a function of time its expectation value decreases monotonically for any initial state . in this paper
we study some of this operator s properties .
in particular , we derive its spectrum and generalized eigenstates , and treat the example of the free particle . * | it is a fundamental question in standard quantum mechanics ( sqm ) of what type of restrictions the schrdinger evolution imposes on the behavior in time of basic objects . in particular , it is of interest to ask if sqm allows for self - adjoint operators having the so - called lyapunov property , that is , monotonicity of the expectation value irrespective of the initial state of the system .
clearly , such an operator would indicate the direction of time .
a natural candidate for a self - adjoint lyapunov operator is a ( self - adjoint ) time operator @xmath0 canonically conjugate to the hamiltonian @xmath1 , such that @xmath0 and @xmath1 form an imprimitivity system @xcite ( implying that each generates a translation on the spectrum of the other ) .
however , a well known theorem of pauli tells us that this is impossible @xcite .
recently , galapon attempted to bypass pauli s arguments and found pairs of @xmath0 and @xmath1 satisfying the canonical commutation relations , but do not constitute an imprimitivity system @xcite .
it can be shown that the @xmath0 operator obtained in this way does not have the lyapunov property .
other authors do not insist on the conjugacy of @xmath0 and @xmath1 . in this context , unruh and wald s proof that a ` monotonically perfect clock ' does not exist @xcite should be noted , as well as misra , prigogine , and courbage s no - go theorem @xcite .
still another solution , advocated by some authors , is to do away with the requirement of self - adjointness @xcite .
a lypaunov self - adjoint operator acting within the framework of standard quantum mechanics was recently introduced in @xcite . in this paper
we study some of its properties .
in particular , we derive its spectrum and generalized eigenstates , and treat the example of the free particle .
let @xmath2 be a separable hilbert space and let @xmath1 be a self - adjoint operator generating a unitary evolution group @xmath3 , with @xmath4 , on @xmath2 .
we take @xmath2 to represent the hilbert space corresponding to some given quantum system and @xmath1 its hamiltonian . for an initial state @xmath5
@xmath6 denotes the state of the system at time @xmath7 and @xmath8 its trajectory .
let @xmath9 be the space of bounded linear operators on @xmath2 .
a ( forward ) lyapunov operator is defined as follows @xcite : let @xmath10 be a self - adjoint operator on @xmath2 .
let @xmath11 be the trajectory corresponding to an initial state @xmath12 .
let @xmath13 be the set of expectation values of @xmath14 in states in @xmath11 .
then @xmath14 is a forward lyapunov operator if the mapping @xmath15 defined by @xmath16 is one to one and monotonically decreasing for all non - recurring trajectories.@xmath17 let @xmath18 be a separable hilbert space and @xmath19 the hilbert space of lebesgue square - integrable @xmath18 valued functions defined on @xmath20 , let @xmath1 be the operator of multiplication by the independent variable on @xmath19 , and let @xmath3 be the continuous one - parameter unitary evolution group generated by @xmath1 , i.e. , @xmath21(e)=[e^{-iht}f](e)=e^{-iet}f(e),\quad f\in l^2(\mathbb r^+;\,\mathcal k),\ \ e\in\mathbb r^+.\ ] ] denote by @xmath22 the hardy spaces of @xmath18 valued functions analytic in @xmath23 .
the hilbert spaces @xmath24 consisting of non - tangential boundary values on @xmath25 in @xmath22 are , respectively , isomorphic to @xmath26 . the spaces @xmath24
are orthogonal subspaces of @xmath27 with @xmath28 .
we denote the orthogonal projections in @xmath27 on @xmath29 and @xmath30 , respectively , by @xmath31 and @xmath32 .
let @xmath33 be the subspaces of @xmath27 consisting of square - integrable functions supported on @xmath34 .
there exists another orthogonal decomposition @xmath35 with projections on @xmath36 and @xmath37 .
the following theorem is proved in @xcite : [ thm : l_2_lyapunov_op ] let @xmath38 be the operator defined by @xmath39 then @xmath14 is a positive , contractive and injective operator on @xmath19 , such that @xmath40 is dense in @xmath19 and @xmath14 is a forward lyapunov operator for the evolution on @xmath19 defined in eq .
( [ eq : l_2_schrodinger_evol ] ) , i.e. , for every @xmath41 we have @xmath42 and moreover @xmath43 . @xmath17 the following corollary to theorem [ thm : l_2_lyapunov_op ] casts eq .
( [ eq : l_2_m ] ) in a more useful form : [ cor : l_2_lyapunov_op ] let @xmath14 be the lyapunov operator given in eq .
( [ eq : l_2_m ] ) .
then , for any function @xmath44 we have @xmath45 @xmath17 * proof : * for every function @xmath46 one has @xcite @xmath47 where @xmath48 is the boundary value function of @xmath49 on @xmath25 . hence , the orthogonal projection @xmath31 of @xmath19 on @xmath29 is explicitly given by @xmath50 where eq .
( [ eq : p_plus_explicit ] ) hold a.e . for @xmath51 . from eqns .
( [ eq : l_2_m ] ) , ( [ eq : p_plus_explicit ] ) we then immediately obtain eq .
( [ eq : m_explicit]).@xmath52 [ thm : m_spectrum ] the spectrum of @xmath14 satisfies @xmath53 $ ] . in @xmath19 choose an orthogonal basis @xmath54 with @xmath55 an appropriate index set such that for every @xmath56 the set @xmath57 is a basis of @xmath18 and we have @xmath58 , where
@xmath59 stands for the kronecker delta for discrete indices and the dirac delta for continuous indices .
then for @xmath60 the function defined by @xmath61 is a generalized eigenfunction of @xmath14 satisfying @xmath62 .
these eigenfunctions are normalized in such a way that @xmath63 and we have the eigenfunction expansion @xmath64 @xmath17 * proof : * consider the eigenvalue equation @xmath65 . in the basis @xmath54 the kernel of @xmath14 is given by @xmath66 .
hence , the eigenvalue equation for @xmath14 assumes the form @xmath67 where @xmath68 .
assume that @xmath60 .
to solve eq .
( [ eq : eigenvalue_equation ] ) we assume that the function @xmath69 is the boundary value on @xmath20 from above of an analytic function @xmath70 defined in @xmath71 .
so that @xmath72 .
this allows us to analytically continue eq .
( [ eq : eigenvalue_equation ] ) into the cut complex plane @xmath73 taking in eq .
( [ eq : complex_eigenvalue_eqn ] ) the difference between the limits from above and below @xmath20 we get @xmath74 the function @xmath75 can now be continued to a second riemann sheet by making use of the branch cut along @xmath76 in eq .
( [ eq : complex_eigenvalue_eqn ] ) . denoting this two sheeted function again by @xmath77 , eq . ( [ eq : complex_eigenvalue_eqn ] ) , reduces to @xmath78 eq .
( [ eq : riemann_surface_eigenvalue_eqn ] ) admits solutions of the form @xmath79 with @xmath80 , @xmath81 , and @xmath82 a normalization factor dependent on @xmath83 .
setting @xmath84 and @xmath85 the solutions of the eigenvalue equation , eq .
( [ eq : eigenvalue_equation ] ) , satisfy @xmath86 . with this choice of @xmath87 and
@xmath88 the generalized eigenfunctions of @xmath14 are given by eq .
( [ eq : m_eigenfunctions ] ) . we proceed to show by construction that the set of generalized eigenfunctions , eq .
( [ eq : m_eigenfunctions ] ) , forms a complete set for the operator @xmath14 .
consider the following integral @xmath89 where @xmath90 is a lebesgue measure on @xmath91 $ ] .
the right hand side of eq .
( [ eq : m_spectral_representation ] ) is readily obtained from that of eq .
( [ eq : m_eigenfunctions ] ) . recall the definition of the euler beta function @xmath92 .
@xmath93 is well defined for @xmath94 and @xmath95 , and can be analytically continued to other parts of the complex @xmath96 and @xmath97 planes .
however , it is not well defined for @xmath98 and @xmath99 , i.e. whenever @xmath100 in eq .
( [ eq : m_spectral_representation ] ) . to avoid this problem we shift @xmath101 ( or @xmath102 ) away from the real axis .
hence , in the integration over @xmath83 on the right hand side of eq .
( [ eq : m_spectral_representation ] ) we take the limit @xmath103 where in the last line in eq .
( [ eq : m_spectral_representation_ii ] ) we used the identity @xmath104 .
thus , the intgral on the spectrum of @xmath14 on the left hand side of eq .
( [ eq : m_spectral_representation_ii ] ) reconstructs the kernel of @xmath14 in eq .
( [ eq : m_explicit ] ) , i.e. , we have reconstructed the operator @xmath14 using the set of generalized eigenfunctions @xmath105 .
taken together with eq .
( [ eq : m_spectral_representation ] ) , eq .
( [ eq : m_spectral_representation_ii ] ) also shows that @xmath14 has no point spectrum at @xmath106 and @xmath107 and that @xmath53 $ ] .
@xmath52 consider a quantum mechanical problem for which the hamiltonian @xmath1 , defined on an appropriate separable hilbert space @xmath2 , satisfies the conditions : ( i ) its ac spectrum is @xmath108 .
( ii ) the multiplicity of @xmath109 is uniform on @xmath20 .
let @xmath110 be the subspace of @xmath2 corresponding to the ac spectrum of @xmath1
. then @xmath110 has a representation in terms of a function space @xmath19 , where @xmath18 is a hilbert space whose dimension correpsonds to the multiplicity of @xmath109 and the evolution generated by @xmath1 is represented by @xmath3 defined in eq .
( [ eq : l_2_schrodinger_evol ] ) . for such models we can apply the results discussed above . using the standard dirac notation ,
( [ eq : l_2_schrodinger_evol ] ) for @xmath14 can be rewritten as @xmath111 where the summation over @xmath112 stands for summation over discrete degeneracy indices and appropriate integration over continuous degeneracy indices .
t as an example we take a one - dimensional gaussian wave - packet representing the propagation free particle of mass @xmath113 along @xmath20 @xmath114 @xmath115 and @xmath116 are the location and width of the wave - packet in momentum space at @xmath117 . after obtaining the generalized eigenfunctions of the free hamiltonian , constructing the lyapunov operator @xmath14 according to eqs .
( [ dirac representation ] ) and ( [ eq : m_spectral_representation ] ) , and applying it to the wave - packet in eq .
( [ 1d gaussian wave - packet ] ) we obtain fig .
1 , showing the time evolution of the expectation value of @xmath14 , and fig .
2 , showing the time evolution of the associated probability density function in the position basis and that of the eigenstates of @xmath14 .
we see that if the sequence of time frames is shown in reverse order one is unable to tell whether time is running backwards or whether one is observing a gaussian wave - packet propagating along the @xmath118 ( with time running forward ) .
however , if to all frames we attach the expectation value of @xmath14 , then it possible to distinguish between these two scenarios .
the example plainly illustrates the time - ordering of states introduced into the hilbert space by the existence of a lyapunov operator . in a forthcoming publication
it will be shown that the existence of the operator @xmath14 leads to an irreversible representation of the quantum dynamics , and to a novel representation of the scattering process , in which the contribution of the resonance is singled out .
+ _ addendum _ this paper presents a mathematically rigorous reworking of some of the results appearing in @xcite , in particular , the derivation of the operator s spectrum and generalized eigenfunctions .
the operator has since been generalized to a larger class of self - adjoint lyapunov operators @xcite .
y.s . acknowledges the support of the israeli science foundation grant no . 1169/06 , and the center for advanced studies in mathematics at ben - gurion university , where part of this research was conducted .
j.s . and s.m .
acknowledge the support of the israeli science foundation grant no .
784/06 .
galapon , pauli s theorem and quantum canonical pairs : the consistency of a bounded , self adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a hamiltonian with nonempty point spectrum , proc .
a ( 2002 ) 451 - 472 .
see , for example , h.m .
evans , perturbation theory and atomic resonances since schrdinger s time , in : f. gesztes , p. deift , c. galvez , p. perry , w. schlag ( eds . ) , spectral theory and mathematical physics : a festschrift in honor of barry simon s 60th birthday , american mathematical society , 2007 . | fundamental question in standard quantum mechanics restrictions schrdinger evolution on behavior time of basic objects if sqm allows self - adjoint operators lyapunov property monotonicity of expectation value irrespective initial state system operator direction of time natural candidate for self - adjoint lyapunov operator is time operator @xmath0 to hamiltonian @xmath1 form imprimitivity system @xcite translation theorem of pauli impossible galapon arguments found pairs of @xmath0 and @xmath1 satisfying commutation relations constitute imprimitivity system @xcite @xmath0 operator lyapunov property authors insist on conjugacy of @xmath0 and @xmath1 unruh and wald s proof ` monotonically perfect clock ' exist @xcite noted misra prigogine courbage s no - go theorem @xcite another solution do away with requirement of self - adjointness @xcite lypaunov self - adjoint operator standard quantum mechanics introduced in @xcite paper study its properties derive its spectrum generalized eigenstates treat example of free particle @xmath2 separable hilbert space @xmath1 self - adjoint operator unitary evolution group @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath2 @xmath2 hilbert space quantum system @xmath1 hamiltonian initial state @xmath5 @xmath6 state system @xmath7 trajectory @xmath9 space bounded linear operators @xmath2 forward lyapunov operator defined @xmath10 self - adjoint operator @xmath2 @xmath11 trajectory initial state @xmath13 expectation values @xmath14 states forward lyapunov operator mapping @xmath15 @xmath16 one to one monotonically decreasing non - recurring trajectories separable hilbert space @xmath19 hilbert space lebesgue square - integrable functions @xmath1 operator multiplication independent variable @xmath19 @xmath3 continuous one - parameter unitary evolution group @xmath1 @xmath21(e)=[e^{-iht}f](e)=e^{-iet}f @xmath22 hardy spaces @xmath18 valued functions @xmath23hilbert spaces @xmath24 non - tangential boundary values @xmath25 @xmath22 isomorphic to @xmath26 spaces @xmath24 orthogonal subspaces @xmath27 @xmath28 orthogonal projections @xmath27 on @xmath29 @xmath30 by @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 subspaces of @xmath27 - integrable functions @xmath34 orthogonal decomposition @xmath35 projections on @xmath36 @xmath37 theorem proved in @xcite_2_lyapunov_op @xmath38 operator defined by @xmath39 @xmath14 positive contractive injective operator on @xmath19 @xmath40 dense in @xmath19 @xmath14 forward lyapunov operator evolution @xmath19 eq @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath17 corollary theorem_lyapunov casts eq @xmath14 lyapunov operator eq function @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath17 function @xmath46 @xcite @xmath47 @xmath48 boundary value function of @xmath49 on @xmath25orthogonal projection @xmath31 @xmath19 on @xmath29 given by @xmath50 eq p_plus_explicit for @xmath51_2_m obtain eq _explicit@xmath52_spectrum spectrum @xmath14 satisfies @xmath53 @xmath19 orthogonal basis @xmath54 with @xmath55 appropriate index set @xmath56 @xmath57 basis of @xmath18 @xmath58 @xmath59 for kronecker delta discrete indices dirac delta for continuous indices @xmath60 function defined by @xmath61 generalized eigenfunction of @xmath14 satisfying @xmath62 eigenfunctions normalized @xmath63 eigenfunction expansion @xmath64 @xmath17 eigenvalue equation @xmath65 basis @xmath54 kernel of @xmath14 given by @xmath66 eigenvalue equation for @xmath14 assumes form @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath60 solve eq function @xmath69 boundary value on @xmath20 of analytic function @xmath70 in @xmath71 continue eq . into complex plane @xmath73 eq .eq : complex_eigenvalue_eqn difference between limits above below @xmath20 @xmath74 function @xmath75 continued to second riemann sheet branch cut along @xmath76 complex_eigenvalue_eqn two sheeted function by @xmath77 reduces to @xmath78 riemann_surface_eigenvalue_eqn admits solutions @xmath79 with @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 normalization factor dependent on @xmath83 setting @xmath84 @xmath85 solutions eigenvalue equation satisfy @xmath86 choice @xmath87 @xmath88 generalized eigenfunctions of @xmath14 given by eq . m_eigenfunctions ] construction set generalized eigenfunctions complete set for operator @xmath14 consider integral @xmath89 where @xmath90 lebesgue measure on @xmath91 right hand side of eq . m_spectral_representation ] obtained from eq _eigenfunctions definition euler beta function @xmath92 @xmath93 defined for @xmath94 @xmath95 continued to complex @xmath96 @xmath97 planes not well defined for @xmath98 @xmath99@xmath100 in eq ._spectral_representation avoid problem shift @xmath101 or @xmath102 ) from real axis integration over @xmath83 right side of eq limit @xmath103 last line eq used identity @xmath104 intgral on spectrum of @xmath14 left side of eq reconstructs kernel @xmath14 eq reconstructed operator @xmath14 using generalized eigenfunctions @xmath105 shows @xmath14 no point spectrum at @xmath106 and @xmath107 @xmath53 @xmath52 quantum mechanical problem hamiltonian @xmath1 separable hilbert space @xmath2 satisfies conditions ac spectrum is @xmath108 multiplicity of @xmath109 uniform on @xmath20 @xmath110 subspace of @xmath2 corresponding to ac spectrum of @xmath1 @xmath110 representation function space @xmath19 @xmath18 is hilbert space dimension to multiplicity of @xmath109 evolution generated by @xmath1 represented by @xmath3 defined in eq . l_schrodinger_evolmodels apply results discussed standard dirac notation eq l_2_schrodinger_evol @xmath14 rewritten as @xmath111 summation over @xmath112 discrete degeneracy indices integration continuous degeneracy indices example one - dimensional gaussian wave - packet propagation free particle mass @xmath113 @xmath20 location width wave packet momentum space @xmath117 obtaining generalized eigenfunctions free hamiltonian lyapunov operator @xmath14 eqs dirac representation m_spectral_representation applying wave - packet gaussian wave - packet obtain fig . 1 time evolution expectation value @xmath14 fig . 2 time evolution probability density function position basis eigenstates @xmath14 sequence time frames reverse order tell time running backwards or gaussian wave - packet propagating along @xmath118 time running forward all frames attach expectation value of @xmath14 distinguish scenarios example illustrates time - ordering of states introduced hilbert space lyapunov operatorforthcoming publication existence operator @xmath14 leads irreversible quantum dynamics novel scattering process contribution resonance singled out paper presents mathematically reworking results @xcite derivation operator s spectrum generalized eigenfunctions operator generalized larger class self - adjoint lyapunov operators @xcite support israeli science foundation grant 1169/06 center advanced studies mathematics ben - gurion university research conducted support israeli science foundation grant 784/06 galapon pauli s theorem quantum canonical pairs consistency bounded self adjoint time operator hamiltonian nonempty point spectrum ( 2002 ) 451 - 472 h.m . evans perturbation theory atomic resonances since schrdinger s time f. gesztes deift galvez perry schlag spectral theory mathematical festschrift barry simon s 60th birthday american mathematical society 2007 | 0.498767 | 3,290 | 1,771 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,971 | we present a global fit to the structure function @xmath0 measured in lepton - proton experiments at small values of bjorken-@xmath1 , @xmath2 , for all experimentally available values of @xmath3 , @xmath4 , using the balitsky - kovchegov equation including running coupling corrections . using our fits to f@xmath5
, we reproduce available data for f@xmath6 and perform predictions , parameter - free and completely driven by small - x evolution , to the kinematic range relevant for the lhec . deep inelastic lepton - hadron scattering ( dis ) experiments constitute one of the main sources of information about the partonic structure of hadrons , as well as a testing ground of pqcd techniques .
the dis program carried out in hera has explored an unprecedented kinematic regime in the dis variables @xmath3 and bjorken-@xmath1 . at small values of @xmath1 , the emission of additional soft gluons in the hadron wavefunction
is enhanced by factors of @xmath7 , resulting in a fast growth of the gluon density of the hadron with decreasing bjorken-@xmath1 .
such growth has been observed in data and , at small enough values of @xmath1 , or , equivalently , for large gluon densities , it is expected to be tamed by repulsive gluon - gluon self - interactions .
the latter mechanism is known as _ saturation _ of the gluon distribution .
it is non - linear phenomenon , closely related to unitarity of the theory , which is not included in the more standard linear approaches to dis based on the dglap or bfkl pqcd evolution equations . here
we present an analysis of available dis data at small-@xmath1 based on the non - linear balitsky - kovchegov ( bk ) equation including the recently calculated running coupling corrections to the evolution kernel @xcite .
the starting point of our analysis is the dipole model of dis , which stems from the @xmath8-factorization theorems in the high - energy limit .
it states that , at small-@xmath1 , the virtual photon - proton cross section can be written as a convolution of the light - cone wavefunction for a virtual photon to split into a quark - antiquark dipole , @xmath9 , times the cross section for dipole - proton interaction . for a hadron homogeneous in the transverse plane ,
one has : @xmath10 where the subscripts t , l stand for the polarization of the virtual photon ( transverse or longitudinal ) , @xmath11 is the dipole transverse size and @xmath3 the photon virtuality .
explicit expressions for @xmath12 in the case of any number of active flavors can be found in @xcite . in our analysis
we consider only the three flavor case , i.e , with no charm quark .
all the information about the strong interactions , and also all the @xmath1 dependence of the absorption cross section , is encoded in the imaginary part of the dipole scattering amplitude , @xmath13 ( related to the dipole cross section through the optical theorem ) .
the normalization @xmath14 in originates from integration over the transverse plane , trivial in the case of a _ cylindrical _ proton considered here , and will be one of the free parameters in the fit .
the inclusive dis structure function is then given by @xmath15 whereas the longitudinal structure function @xmath16 is obtained by just considering the longitudinal component .
general arguments in qcd indicate that the dipole scattering amplitude is small for small dipole sizes @xmath11 ( _ color transparency _ ) , whereas large dipoles suffer a large absorption .
phenomenological works in the context of saturation parametrize the transition between these two regimes , _ dilute _ and _ saturated _ , in terms of a @xmath1-dependent saturation scale @xmath17 , such that @xmath18 for @xmath19 , whereas @xmath20 for @xmath21 .
the details of the parametrization depend on the physical input considered in each case .
the leading @xmath1-dependence of the structure functions is thus encoded in that of the saturation scale , commonly assumed to have a power - law behavior : @xmath22 gev@xmath23 , with the _ evolution speed _
@xmath24 being a free parameter fitted to experimental data . the results from different groups , albeit using slightly different parametrizations of the dipole amplitude , report @xmath25 . in this work , rather than resorting to phenomenological models
, we calculate the @xmath1-dependence of the dipole amplitude in terms of the pqcd non - linear bk evolution equation including the recently calculated running coupling corrections .
importantly , the original , leading - log ( ll ) in @xmath26 bk equation yields an evolution speed @xmath27 , with @xmath28 the bare coupling @xcite .
such value is too large to attempt a good description of data .
importantly , the running coupling corrections to the ll kernel obtained through resummation of @xmath29 terms bring the evolution speed down to values compatible with those extracted from data , among other interesting dynamical effects @xcite .
the bk equation reads @xmath30\ , , \label{bklo}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath31 and @xmath32 is the starting point for the evolution . in our case
@xmath33 is the largest experimental value of @xmath1 included in the fit .
the precise shape of the running coupling kernel @xmath34 depends on the scheme chosen to single out the ultra - violet divergent contributions from the finite ones that originate after the resummation of quark loops .
it was found in @xcite that the prescription suggested by balitsky in @xcite minimizes the role of the subleading contributions , and is therefore better suited for phenomenological applications .
the corresponding kernel is @xmath35\ , .
\label{kbal}\ ] ] .values of the fitting parameters from the fit to available @xmath36 data with @xmath37 and for all available values of @xmath3 , @xmath38 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ restab ] -0.2 cm details about the numerical method used to solve the bk equation can be found in @xcite .
we evaluate the coupling according to the standard one - loop qcd expression . in order to regularize it in the infrared , we freeze it to a constant value for @xmath39 , with @xmath40 .
thus @xmath41 and @xmath42 for @xmath39 .
the parameter @xmath43 in is a free parameter in the fit .
we take @xmath44 gev . .
solid red lines correspond to gbw i.c . , and
dotted blue ones to mv i.c.,width=8 ] a final ingredient in our analyses is the initial condition for the evolution , i.e. the specific form of the dipole amplitude at @xmath45 .
we considered two different initial conditions , _ gbw _ : @xmath46}\ , , \label{gbw}\ ] ] and _ mv _ : @xmath47}\ , , \label{mv}\ ] ] where @xmath48 is the initial saturation scale and @xmath49 is another free parameter which controls the small @xmath11 behavior of the dipole amplitude . for the fit with _
gbw _ i.c .
@xmath49 is kept fixed to 1 .
all in all , there are four ( three when @xmath49 is fixed ) free parameters in the fit : the initial saturation scale @xmath50 , the overall normalization @xmath14 , the infrared parameter @xmath43 and the anomalous dimension @xmath49 . with this setup
we obtain an excellent fit to available experimental data for the inclusive dis structure function @xmath36 with @xmath51 and all existing values for @xmath3 , @xmath52 gev@xmath23 , which adds up to 847 data points . in order to smoothly go to photoproduction ,
we have used the following redefinition of the bjorken variable : @xmath53 , with @xmath54 gev for the three light flavors considered in this work .
the experimental data included in the fit has been obtained by the h1 and zeus collaborations ( hera ) and by the e665 ( fermilab ) and nmc ( cern ) collaborations . the parameters from the fit are presented in table 1 .
we have checked that the quality of the fit and the values of the parameters are stable under the restriction of the data range to the region @xmath55 gev@xmath23 ( which leaves 703 data points for the fit ) .
a comparison between a selection of experimental data and the results from the fit for @xmath36 is shown in fig . [ figf2 ] . the two initial conditions _ gbw _ and _ mv _ offer equally good fits to data . with the parameters values yielded by the fit
, we obtain a good description of the longitudinal structure function , as shown in fig .
[ figfl ] .
-0.2 cm .
the theoretical results have been computed at the same @xmath56 as the experimental ones.,title="fig : " ] .
the theoretical results have been computed at the same @xmath56 as the experimental ones.,title="fig : " ] the analyses of available data , including this work , offer compelling evidence for the presence of gluon saturation effects .
however , a clear distinction from alternative ( linear ) approaches can not yet be established unambiguously .
indeed , a good description of all data for @xmath57 can be achieved using dglap fits , even though the very application of dglap at such low @xmath3 is questionable . on the other hand , the observables like @xmath58 which are more sensitive to the gluon distribution are poorly determined experimentally .
the proposed lhec @xcite may have the potential to disentangle different physical scenarios through a deeper exploration of the small-@xmath1 kinematic region .
the question rises of which observable is best suited to pin down the saturation of the proton gluon distribution .
a partial answer is given in fig .
[ pseudo ] , courtesy of juan rojo @xcite .
it presents a nnpdf1.2 dglap fit @xcite to pseudodata for proton f@xmath5 and f@xmath6 in the kinematic regime relevant for the lhec ( down to @xmath59 approx . ) .
the pseudodata are generated by extrapolation of the fit to f@xmath5 presented here using bk evolution , and thus include saturation effects . while @xmath0 can be well fitted by dglap ,
the best dglap fit to pseudotata underestimate @xmath58 at small @xmath3 and overshoots it at the largest @xmath3 considered , yielding a large @xmath60d.o.f .. one concludes that a precise experimental determination of @xmath58 at the lhec over a large enough @xmath3 range might suffice to pin down the kinematic region where departure between dglap and non - linear ( or , maybe , linear resummed small-@xmath1 evolution ) takes place , while @xmath0 does not offer such discrimination power . -1 cm ( left plot ) and f@xmath6 ( right plot ) generated by extrapolation of our fits down to @xmath59 for @xmath61 and @xmath62 gev@xmath23.,title="fig : " ] ( left plot ) and f@xmath6 ( right plot ) generated by extrapolation of our fits down to @xmath59 for @xmath61 and @xmath62 gev@xmath23.,title="fig : " ] | we would like to thank juan rojo for providing us with fig . [ pseudo ] and for useful discussions . | thank juan rojo providing fig . pseudo useful discussions | 0.066392 | 23 | 11 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,977 | we analyze the quark spectral function above and below the critical temperature for deconfinement and at finite momentum in quenched lattice qcd .
it is found that the temporal quark correlation function in the deconfined phase near the critical temperature is well reproduced by a two - pole ansatz for the spectral function .
the bare quark mass and momentum dependences of the spectral function are analyzed with this ansatz . in the chiral limit
we find that even near the critical temperature the quark spectral function has two collective modes corresponding to the normal and plasmino excitations in the high temperature ( @xmath0 ) limit .
the pole mass of these modes at zero momentum , which should be identified to be the thermal mass of the quark , is approximately proportional to @xmath0 in a rather wide range of @xmath0 in the deconfined phase . | after the advent of relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) , much attention has been paid for the properties of matter near and above the critical temperature of qcd phase transition , @xmath1 . to understand the structure of the matter in this region , it is desirable to identify the basic degrees of freedom of the system and their excitation properties . in the present study
, we analyze the spectral properties of quarks , which are one of the fundamental degrees of freedom of qcd , at finite temperature above and below @xmath1 using quenched lattice qcd with clover improved fermions @xcite . at asymptotically high temperatures
, one can calculate the quark propagator using perturbative techniques .
it is known that the collective excitations of quarks in this limit develop a mass gap ( thermal mass ) that is proportional to @xmath2 , where @xmath3 and @xmath0 denote the gauge coupling and temperature , respectively @xcite . moreover , in this limit the number of poles in the quark propagator is doubled ; in addition to the normal modes , which reduce to poles in the free particle propagator , plasmino modes appear . in order to see the properties of quark spectral function @xmath4 in this limit ,
let us first consider the spectral function at zero momentum .
in this case , the dirac structure of @xmath4 can be decomposed using the projection operators @xmath5 as @xmath6 while @xmath7 for free quarks are given by @xmath8 , in the high temperature limit one obtains @xmath9 /2 $ ] , where @xmath10 is the thermal mass .
the two poles at @xmath11 correspond to the normal and plasmino modes .
the dirac structure of @xmath4 in the high temperature limit is also decomposed as @xmath12 with the projection operators @xmath13 and @xmath14 .
the spectral functions @xmath15 in the high temperature limit read @xmath16 where @xmath17 represents the contribution of the continuum taking non - zero values in the space - like region , and poles at @xmath18 and @xmath19 corresponds to the normal and plasmino modes , respectively .
the dispersion relation of the plasmino has a minimum at nonzero @xmath20 @xcite .
in this section , we analyze the quark spectral function for zero momentum but with finite bare quark mass on the lattice .
we use gauge field ensembles which have been generated and used previously by the bielefeld group to study screening masses and spectral functions @xcite .
the quark spectral function in this case is decomposed into @xmath7 as in eq .
( [ eq : rho^m ] ) . in order to extract the spectral function @xmath21 from the lattice correlation function
, we assume a simple ansatz for the shape of @xmath21 including few fitting parameters . we found that the two - pole ansatz for @xmath21 , @xmath22 reproduces the lattice correlator quite well , where @xmath23 , and @xmath24 are fitting parameters determined from the correlated fit . the pole at @xmath25 in eq .
( [ eq:2pole ] ) corresponds to the plasmino mode .
the success of two - pole ansatz for the quark correlation functions suggests that the positions of the poles of the quark propagator would be near the real axis at @xmath26 and @xmath27 with small imaginary parts .
provided that the positions of poles of the propagator are gauge independent , this also indicates that our results on the fitting parameters @xmath28 and @xmath29 have small gauge dependence . and the relative strength of the plasmino mode , @xmath30 , at @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 obtained from calculations on lattice of size @xmath34 . ] in fig .
[ fig : ze ] , we show the dependence of @xmath28 , @xmath29 and @xmath30 on the bare quark mass , @xmath35 , for @xmath31 , @xmath32 , and @xmath33 obtained from calculations on lattices of size @xmath34 .
the figure shows that the ratio @xmath36 becomes larger with decreasing @xmath35 and eventually reaches @xmath37 irrespective of @xmath0 .
the numerical result for each @xmath0 shows that @xmath38 is satisfied within statistical errors there .
these results mean that the quark propagator is chirally symmetric at this point @xcite . moreover , @xmath21 at this point has the same form as the spectral function in the high temperature limit .
we therefore define the thermal mass of the quark on the lattice as @xmath39 at this point .
one finds that the ratio @xmath40 is insensitive to @xmath0 in the range analyzed in this work , although it becomes slightly larger with decreasing @xmath0 , which would be in accordance with the expected parametric form at high temperature , @xmath41 .
figure [ fig : ze ] also shows that the relative strength of the plasmino pole , @xmath42 , decreases with increasing values of the bare mass , @xmath35 .
the spectral function @xmath21 thus will eventually be dominated by a single - pole .
this result agrees with the perturbative result in yukawa models that @xmath21 approaches the spectral function of free quarks as the bare quarks mass becomes larger @xcite . for @xmath43
, we found that the lattice correlator is concave in the log - scale plot .
this behavior indicates that the positivity condition of @xmath21 is violated below @xmath1 .
in fact , we have checked that the two - pole ansatz eq .
( [ eq:2pole ] ) gives unacceptably large @xmath44 below @xmath1 .
it is also found that the quark correlator does not approach the chirally symmetric one even in the chiral limit , in contrast to the previous result for @xmath45 .
these results for @xmath43 seem consistent with a nave picture that quark excitations are confined and the chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken below @xmath1 .
and @xmath29 and the ratio @xmath42 on the lattice momentum @xmath46 for @xmath47 and @xmath33 . ]
next let us analyze the quark spectral function at finite momentum on lattices with size @xmath34 for @xmath47 and @xmath33 . throughout this section
we consider the quark propagator in the chiral limit .
the quark propagator in the chiral limit is decomposed into @xmath48 according to eq .
( [ eq : rho^p ] ) .
following the same approach used in the previous section , we adopt the two - pole ansatz @xmath49 and determine four parameters from a correlated fit .
the @xmath50-functions at @xmath26 and @xmath27 correspond to the normal and plasmino modes , respectively .
we found that @xmath51 with this ansatz is always smaller than @xmath32 for all momenta analyzed in this study .
this result means that the two - pole ansatz again reproduces the lattice correlation function well . in fig .
[ fig : p>0 ] , we show the momentum dependence of the fitting parameters @xmath28 , @xmath29 , and @xmath42 for @xmath47 and @xmath33 .
the horizontal axis represents the momentum on the lattice @xmath52 .
the figure shows that for large momentum @xmath42 rapidly decreases and @xmath28 approaches the light cone .
the spectral function at large momentum therefore approaches that of a free quark , consistent with the perturbative result .
one also finds that @xmath29 is always smaller than @xmath28 , in contrast to the results in the previous section .
this behavior qualitatively agrees with the behavior of poles in the high @xmath0 limit @xcite .
one also observes from fig .
[ fig : p>0 ] that @xmath29 enters the space - like region at high momentum .
an interesting property of the quark propagator in the high temperature limit eq .
( [ eq : rho^p_htl ] ) is that the dispersion relation of the plasmino has a minimum at finite momentum . in fig .
[ fig : p>0 ] , one sees that the value of @xmath29 at lowest non - zero momentum on our lattice , @xmath53 , is slightly larger than that at zero momentum , and the existence of such a minimum is suggested but not yet confirmed in the present analysis . in summary
, we analyzed the dependence of the quark spectral function on temperature @xmath0 , bare quark mass @xmath54 , and momentum @xmath20 in quenched lattice qcd with landau gauge fixing .
above @xmath1 , we found that the two - pole approximations for the spectral functions in the projected channels , @xmath7 and @xmath48 , can well reproduce the lattice correlation functions .
although further studies on the volume dependence is needed , this result indicates that the excitations of quarks have small decay width even near @xmath1 . below @xmath1 ,
on the other hand , the two - pole ansatz fails completely .
f. karsch _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 530 * , 147 ( 2002 ) ; s. datta , f. karsch , p. petreczky and i. wetzorke , phys .
d * 69 * , 094507 ( 2004 ) .
g. baym , j. p. blaizot and b. svetitsky , phys .
d * 46 * , 4043 ( 1992 ) . | relativistic heavy ion collider rhic attention properties matter near above critical temperature qcd phase transition @xmath1 understand structure identify basic degrees freedom excitation properties present study analyze spectral properties quarks fundamental degrees freedom qcd at finite temperature above below @xmath1 using quenched lattice qcd with clover improved fermions @xcite high temperatures calculate quark propagator perturbative techniques collective excitations quarks develop mass gap thermal mass proportional to @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath0 denote gauge coupling temperature number poles in quark propagator doubled plasmino modes appear properties quark spectral function @xmath4 consider function at zero momentum dirac structure @xmath4 decomposed using projection operators @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 high temperature limit @xmath9 /2 $ ] @xmath10 thermal mass two poles at @xmath11 correspond to normal plasmino modes dirac structure @xmath4 decomposed as @xmath12 with projection operators @xmath13 @xmath14spectral functions @xmath15 high temperature limit read @xmath16 @xmath17 contribution continuum non - zero values space - like region poles @xmath18 @xmath19 normal plasmino modes dispersion relation plasmino minimum nonzero @xmath20 @xcite analyze quark spectral function zero momentum finite quark mass lattice use gauge field ensembles bielefeld group masses spectral functions quark spectral function decomposed @xmath7 extract spectral function @xmath21 lattice correlation function assume simple ansatz shape @xmath21 few fitting parameters two - pole ansatz @xmath21 @xmath22 reproduces lattice correlator @xmath23 @xmath24 fitting parameters correlated fit pole @xmath25 plasmino mode success two - pole ansatz quark correlation suggests positions poles quark propagator near real axis @xmath26 @xmath27 small imaginary parts positions poles gauge independent results fitting parameters @xmath28 @xmath29 small gauge dependence relative strength plasmino mode @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath33 calculations lattice size @xmath34 fig .fig : ze dependence of @xmath28 on bare quark mass from calculations lattices @xmath34 ratio @xmath36 larger @xmath35 reaches @xmath37 irrespective of @xmath0 numerical result @xmath38 satisfied within statistical errors quark propagator chirally symmetric @xcite @xmath21 same form as spectral function in high temperature limit thermal mass of quark on lattice as @xmath39 ratio @xmath40 insensitive to @xmath0 in range becomes slightly larger decreasing @xmath0 accordance with expected parametric form at high temperature @xmath41 relative strength of plasmino pole @xmath42 decreases with increasing bare mass @xmath35 spectral function @xmath21 dominated by single - pole agrees with models @xmath21 approaches spectral function quarks as mass larger @xcite @xmath43 lattice correlator concave in log - scale plot positivity condition of @xmath21 violated below @xmath1 two - pole ansatz eq gives unacceptably large @xmath44 below @xmath1found quark correlator approach chirally symmetric in chiral limit contrast to previous result @xmath45 results @xmath43 consistent with quark excitations confined chiral symmetry broken below @xmath1 @xmath29 ratio @xmath42 on lattice momentum @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath33 analyze quark spectral function at finite momentum on lattices @xmath34 quark propagator in chiral limit decomposed into @xmath48 adopt two - pole ansatz @xmath49 determine four parameters correlated fit @xmath50-functions at @xmath26 @xmath27 correspond to normal plasmino modes @xmath51 ansatz smaller than @xmath32 all momenta two - pole ansatz reproduces lattice correlation fig momentum dependence of fitting parameters @xmath28 @xmath42 @xmath47 @xmath33 horizontal axis represents momentum on lattice @xmath52 large momentum @xmath42 decreases @xmath28 approaches light cone spectral function at large momentum approaches free quark consistent with perturbative result @xmath29 always smaller than @xmath28 contrast previousbehavior agrees with poles in high @xmath0 limit fig @xmath29 enters space - like region at high momentum quark propagator high temperature limit dispersion relation plasmino minimum at finite momentum fig value @xmath29 at lowest non - zero momentum lattice @xmath53 slightly larger than at zero momentum existence minimum suggested not confirmed analyzed quark spectral function on temperature @xmath0 quark mass @xmath54 momentum @xmath20 in quenched lattice qcd with landau gauge fixing above @xmath1 two - pole approximations spectral functions channels @xmath7 @xmath48 reproduce lattice correlation functions further studies needed indicates excitations quarks have small decay width near @xmath1 below @xmath1 two - pole ansatz fails f. karsch phys . b * 530 *, 147 ( 2002 ) datta petreczky wetzorke 69 094507 ( 2004 ) baym blaizot svetitsky phys 46 * 4043 ( 1992 ) | 0.315646 | 2,137 | 1,116 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,979 | we present a short review of the status of the dark matter problem .
in particular we show that one of the best motivated candidate for the dark matter is the neutralino , a supersymmetric particle .
finally we study the possibility to detect @xmath0-rays coming from neutralino pair annihilations that take place in our galactic center with the upcoming satellite detector glast .
= 11.6pt | the dark matter problem is one of the most fascinating and intriguing issue in the astroparticle physics .
this subject requires theoretical concepts and experimental techniques coming from cosmology , astrophysics and fundamental particle physics . by definition dark matter is a kind of non luminous matter .
its existence is required by a bunch of striking experimental evidences as well as by some compelling theoretical motivations .
one of most interesting experimental evidences is given by the observations of the spiral galaxy rotation curves @xcite .
they can be determined well outside the luminous core of the galaxy , measuring the circular velocities of the neutral hydrogen clouds using the @xmath1 cm lines emissions .
the result when expressed as a function of the galactocentric distance @xmath2 is that @xmath3 for large @xmath2 ( in particular for @xmath4 ) rather than the expected @xmath5 . if we suppose that the first newton s law still holds at the galactic scale we must conclude that @xmath6 where @xmath7 is the total mass inside a shell of radius @xmath2 . hence there must be a `` dark '' contribution to the galactic mass @xmath8 .
recent measurements @xcite of the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) strongly indicates that the total matter contribution is @xmath9 where @xmath10 is the hubble constant in units of 100 km s@xmath11 mpc@xmath11 .
hence @xmath12 is much larger than the baryonic term @xmath13 .
necessarily the dominant matter component must be of a non baryonic form .
it turns out that the best motivated candidates are some kind of weak interacting massive particles ( wimps ) .
usually these type of candidates are stable particles that appear in various extension of the standard model ( sm ) of particle physics .
from the theoretical point of view the most interesting extension of the sm involves supersymmetry . here
we will focus in particular on @xmath14 supersymmetric extension of the sm with soft supersymmetry breaking terms .
this is the so called minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) @xcite .
usually the lightest supersymmetric particle ( lsp ) that appear in the mssm mass spectrum is a good cdm candidate @xcite .
it turns out that the lsp is often the lightest neutralino .
the four neutralino gauge eigenstates are linear combination of the gaugino and higgsino fields : @xmath15 where @xmath16 .
the corresponding mass eigenstates can be obtained by diagonalizing the mass matrix : @xmath17 that depends by various mssm parameters , like the gaugino masses @xmath18 and @xmath19 ( that are associated , in the lagrangian , to explicit supersymmetry breaking terms ) or the @xmath20 parameter that appears in the higgs sector @xcite . the lowest eigenvalue of the mass matrix in equation [ neutmassmatrix ] is exactly the lsp , until the so called r - parity is conserved @xcite .
the neutralino is a majorana fermion , so it coincides with its own antiparticle , and it is a weak interacting particle .
the r - parity conservation implies that the lightest neutralino can not decay in sm particles and so it is a stable particle . for these reasons
the neutralino is a good cdm candidate .
moreover a neutralino pair can self annihilate into various sm particles that we can detect .
in the previous section we have seen that the neutralino is a good cdm candidate .
it is possible to study its properties through indirect detection of cosmic rays coming from pair annihilations in the dark galactic halo . in particular here we focus on the cosmic @xmath0-rays from the galactic center ( gc ) .
the egret data from the gc @xcite give a strong indication of an excess with respect of the `` standard '' model production of @xmath0-rays @xcite . in the standard picture , the diffuse @xmath0-ray background is due to the following processes : * @xmath21 production that promptly decays in @xmath22 @xmath23 where @xmath24 and @xmath25 are primary protons and heliums and @xmath26 is the interstellar hydrogen or helium . *
bremsstrahlung * inverse compton we are only interested in the energy range above @xmath27 gev where the dominant component is by far the @xmath21 production .
in the subsequent analysis we consider only this component for the diffuse background .
we want to explain the gc excess adding a neutralino induced component in the @xmath21 production .
the leading intermediate annihilation channels for the @xmath21 production , through fragmentation and/or decay processes , are often @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 ( see figure [ feynman - diag ] ) .
this is valid not only for the neutralino but also for a generic majorana fermion wimp , as for such particles the s - wave annihilation rate into lighter fermions is suppressed by a factor @xmath32 , where @xmath33 is the final state fermion mass and @xmath34 is the wimp mass . we can write the total diffuse @xmath0-ray flux as a sum of two components : @xmath35 where the background flux @xmath36 is splitted into two factors : @xmath37 where @xmath38 ( measured in @xmath39 ) is the local emissivity per hydrogen atom . the neutralino induced component @xmath40 is given by @xcite : @xmath41 where @xmath42 is the detector angular acceptance and where we have introduced the dimensionless function j that contains the dependence on the dark halo density profile : @xmath43 we have introduced the unknown normalization factor @xmath44 in order to take into account our ignorance of the exact hydrogen column density , _
i.e. _ the interstellar medium , while the @xmath45 factor parametrize our ignorance of the dark matter halo model .
results from n - body simulations @xcite@xcite give for for the dark matter density : @xmath46^{\left(\beta -\gamma\right)/\alpha}\ ] ] where @xmath47 , @xmath48 and @xmath0 are parameters that describe the halo profile ( isothermal sphere , nfw , moore , .. ) , @xmath49 is the wimp density measured here and @xmath50 is the galactocentric distance .
having introduced the neutralino induced component the fit of the gc egret data greatly improves . in the context of a simplified _ toy model _
@xcite , valid for a generic majorana fermion wimp of mass @xmath34 and with a fixed dominant intermediate annihilation channel , the result is shown in figure [ egretdata - fit ] .
gev ) induced component with @xmath30 dominant annihilation channel .
the best fit parameters @xmath44 and @xmath45 are indicated in the upper right corner . ]
our analysis shows that the egret data fit improves for small neutralino masses . in order to extract much more information about the gc egret excess we have to wait for the upcoming generation of telescope satellite , like glast @xcite . with respect to egret
, glast has a wider energy range , increased effective area and better energy and angular resolution .
hence we have studied what kind of data glast would collect from the gc , under the hypotesis that the excess , as mapped by egret , is due to wimp annihilations . relying on a simplified picture of the glast detector performances ( energy resolution of about @xmath51 , angular resolution of @xmath52 sr and peak effective area of @xmath53 ) , we have computed the gc data set which will be obtained by glast in 2 years . we have superimposed the error bars associated to the statistical errors only for the chosen energy binning and with an angular acceptance of @xmath54 .
the result , in this case , is shown in figure [ egretdata - glast ] .
all the previous results are valid in the case of a generic wimp . at the end
we want to identify the neutralino as our wimp candidate .
to do so we must consider a `` realistic '' supersymmetric model , _
i.e. _ the mssm .
in order to reduce the number of free parameters of the mssm it is possible different supersymmetry breaking scenarios in which the supersymmetry breaking terms derive from an underlying high energy theory .
one of the most widely studied frameworks is the so - called minimal supergravity ( msugra ) or constrained mssm ( cmssm ) @xcite . in the msugra model there is an important assumption about the _ universality _ of all the coupling constants at the grand unification scale ( gut ) . with these constraints
the number of free parameters is only five : @xmath55 where @xmath56 is the common scalar mass , @xmath57 is the common gaugino mass and @xmath58 is the proportionality factor between the supersymmetry breaking trilinear couplings and the yukawa couplings .
@xmath59 denotes the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two neutral components of the su(2 ) higgs doublet , while the higgs mixing @xmath20 is determined ( up to a sign ) by imposing the electro - weak symmetry breaking ( ewsb ) conditions at the weak scale . in this context
the mssm can be regarded as an effective low energy theory .
the parameters at the weak energy scale are determined by the evolution of those at the unification scale , according to the renormalization group equations ( rges ) .
fixing @xmath59 , @xmath58 and @xmath60 we have performed an accurate scan in the @xmath61 msugra parameter space , looking for the minimum normalization factor @xmath45 needed to be able to single out the neutralino annihilation signal with glast . in this case
we have taken advantage of the better glast angular resolution ( @xmath62 ) with respect to egret . in this deeper analysis
we have also computed the neutralino relic density : @xmath63 solving the boltzmann equation that describes the time evolution of the neutralino number density @xmath64 : @xmath65\ ] ] this equation can be easily solved numerically including resonances , threshold effects and all possible coannihilation processes @xcite .
the results , for two possible choices of the parameters @xmath59 , @xmath58 and @xmath60 , are shown in figure [ msugra - plots ] .
plane , for the value of the normalization factor @xmath45 , that allows the detection of the neutralino @xmath0 ray signal , with glast .
the light shaded region corresponds to the cosmologically favoured region where @xmath66 , while the dark shaded one corresponds to models that are excluded either by incorrect ewsb , lep bounds violations or because the neutralino is not the lsp.,title="fig : " ] plane , for the value of the normalization factor @xmath45 , that allows the detection of the neutralino @xmath0 ray signal , with glast .
the light shaded region corresponds to the cosmologically favoured region where @xmath66 , while the dark shaded one corresponds to models that are excluded either by incorrect ewsb , lep bounds violations or because the neutralino is not the lsp.,title="fig : " ] the contour plots , in the msugra @xmath61 plane , show the normalization factor @xmath45 needed for glast detection , at @xmath67 level , of the neutralino induced @xmath0 ray signal .
we have performed an analysis of the possibility of an indirect detection of supersymmetric dark matter with cosmic @xmath0-rays .
the most important indication is that there is indeed room for supersymmetric dark matter in the already available @xmath0-ray data from egret .
moreover the computation of the expected @xmath0-ray flux coming from dark matter annihilation with upcoming detector glast shows that it will be possible to study in more details a supersymmetric signal .
this work has been performed in collaboration with alessandro cesarini , francesco fucito and aldo morselli in roma tor vergata university and with piero ullio at sissa in trieste .
i would like to thank the glast dark matter working group , in particular the slac people , for many interesting discussions on the argument .
spergel _ et al _ , astro - ph/0302209 .
h. e. haber _ et al _ , phys . rept .
* 117 * , 75 ( 1985 ) .
k. griest _ et al _ , phys .
rept . * 333 * , 167 ( 2000 ) .
s. p. martin , arxiv : hep - ph/9709356 .
h. mayer - hasselwander _ et al _ , astron
. astrophys . * 335 * , 161 ( 1998 ) .
a. w. strong _ et al _ , astrophys .
j. * 537 * , 763 ( 2000 ) [ erratum - ibid . *
541 * , 1109 ( 2000 ) ] .
a. cesarini _ et al _ , arxiv : astro - ph/0305075 .
proposal for the gamma - ray large area space telescope , slac - r-522 ( 1998 ) ; glast proposal to nasa a0 - 99 - 055 - 03 ( 1999 ) .
j.f . navarro _
et al _ , astrophys . j. * 462 * , 563 ( 1996 ) .
s. ghigna _ et al _ , astrophys .
j. * 544 * , 616 ( 2000 ) . l. j. hall _ et al _ , phys .
d * 27 * , 2359 ( 1983 ) . s. p.
martin _ et al _ , phys .
d * 50 * , 2282 ( 1994 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9311340 ] .
j. edsjo _ et al _ , jcap * 0304 * , 001 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0301106 ] . | dark matter problem fascinating in astroparticle physics requires concepts experimental techniques from cosmology astrophysics fundamental particle physics dark matter non luminous matter existence required by experimental evidences compelling theoretical motivations spiral galaxy rotation curves determined outside luminous core galaxy measuring circular velocities neutral hydrogen clouds using @xmath1 cm lines emissions result galactocentric distance is @xmath3 for large @xmath2 @xmath4 ) @xmath5 first newton s law holds galactic scale @xmath6 @xmath7 is total mass inside shell radius @xmath2 dark '' contribution to galactic mass @xmath8 measurements anisotropy cosmic microwave background indicates total matter contribution is @xmath9 @xmath10 is hubble constant in units 100 km s@xmath11 mpc@xmath11 @xmath12 larger than baryonic term @xmath13 dominant matter component must non baryonic form best motivated candidates are weak interacting massive particles stable particles in standard model of particle physics interesting extension involves supersymmetry focus on @xmath14 supersymmetric extension with soft supersymmetry breaking termsminimal supersymmetric standard model mssm ) @xcite lightest supersymmetric particle lsp mass spectrum good cdm candidate lsp lightest neutralino four neutralino gauge eigenstates are linear gaugino higgsino fields @xmath15 @xmath16 mass eigenstates obtained by diagonalizing mass matrix : @xmath17 depends by mssm parameters gaugino masses @xmath18 @xmath19 associated supersymmetry breaking terms @xmath20 parameter higgs sector lowest eigenvalue of mass matrix is lsp until r - parity conserved neutralino majorana fermion coincides with antiparticle weak interacting particle r - parity conservation implies lightest neutralino not decay in sm particles stable particle neutralino good cdm candidate neutralino pair can self annihilate into sm particles study properties through indirect detection of cosmic rays from pair annihilations in dark galactic halo focus on cosmic @xmath0-rays from galactic center gc ) egret data from gc @xcite excess standard model production of @xmath0-raysstandard picture diffuse @xmath0-ray background due to processes @xmath21 production decays in @xmath22 primary protons heliums interstellar hydrogen helium bremsstrahlung inverse compton interested energy range above @xmath27 gev dominant @xmath21 production subsequent analysis consider component diffuse background explain gc excess adding neutralino induced component @xmath21 production leading intermediate annihilation channels production @xmath28 @xmath30 @xmath31 figure valid neutralino generic majorana fermion wimp s - wave annihilation rate lighter fermions suppressed by factor @xmath32 @xmath33 final state fermion mass wimp mass total diffuse @xmath0-ray flux sum of two components @xmath35 background flux @xmath36 splitted two factors @xmath37 @xmath38 local emissivity per hydrogen atom neutralino induced component @xmath40 given @xmath41 @xmath42 detector angular acceptance introduced dimensionless function j dependence dark halo density profile introduced unknown normalization factor @xmath44 ignorance exact hydrogen column densityinterstellar medium @xmath45 factor ignorance dark matter halo model results n - body simulations @xcite dark matter density @xmath46\gamma\right\alpha @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath0 halo profile @xmath49 wimp density @xmath50 galactocentric distance introduced neutralino induced component fit gc egret data improves simplified model @xcite majorana fermion wimp mass @xmath34 fixed dominant intermediate annihilation channel result shown in figure egretdata - fit component @xmath30 dominant annihilation channel best fit parameters @xmath44 @xmath45 upper right corner analysis egret data fit improves for small neutralino masses more information gc egret excess wait upcoming generation telescope satellite glast @xcite glast wider energy range increased effective area better energy angular resolution studied data glast gc hypotesis excess due to wimp annihilations glast detector performances energy resolution @xmath51 angular resolution peak effective area @xmath53 computed gc data set obtained by glast in 2 yearssuperimposed error bars statistical errors for chosen energy binning angular acceptance of @xmath54 result shown in figure [ egretdata - glast ] previous results valid generic wimp identify neutralino as wimp candidate consider realistic supersymmetric model mssm reduce free parameters mssm supersymmetry breaking scenarios high energy theory studied minimal supergravity ( msugra ) constrained mssm @xcite msugra model assumption universality of coupling constants at grand unification scale constraints free parameters five : @xmath55 @xmath56 common scalar mass @xmath57 common gaugino mass @xmath58 proportionality factor between supersymmetry breaking trilinear couplings yukawa couplings @xmath59 ratio of vacuum expectation values of two neutral components of su(2 ) higgs doublet higgs mixing @xmath20 determined by electro - weak symmetry breaking ) conditions at weak scale mssm effective low energy theory parameters at weak energy scale determined by evolution of unification scale renormalization group equationsfixing @xmath59 performed accurate scan @xmath61 msugra parameter space minimum normalization factor @xmath45 single out neutralino annihilation signal with glast better glast angular resolution @xmath62 egret computed neutralino relic density @xmath63 solving boltzmann equation time evolution neutralino number density @xmath64 : @xmath65 equation solved numerically including resonances threshold effects coannihilation processes results parameters @xmath59 shown in figure msugra - plots value normalization factor @xmath45 detection neutralino @xmath0 ray signal with glast light shaded region cosmologically favoured region @xmath66 dark shaded models excluded incorrect ewsb lep bounds violations neutralino not lsp plane normalization factor @xmath45 detection neutralino ray signal glast light shaded region favoured region @xmath66 dark shaded models excluded incorrect ewsb lep bounds violations neutralino not lsp contour plots @xmath61 plane show normalization factor @xmath45 needed for glast detection at @xmath67 level neutralino induced @xmath0 ray signalperformed analysis indirect detection supersymmetric dark matter with cosmic @xmath0-rays room for supersymmetric dark matter in data egret computation expected-ray flux from dark matter annihilation detector glast shows study supersymmetric signal work performed with alessandro cesarini francesco fucito aldo morselli roma tor vergata university piero ullio sissa trieste glast dark matter working group slac people discussions spergel astro - ph/0302209 haber phys 117 *, 75 ( 1985 ) griest 333 * 167 ( 2000 ) p martin arxiv hep - ph/9709356 mayer - hasselwander 335 *, 161 ( 1998 ) strong astrophys 537, 763 ( 2000 ) 541 *, 1109 ( 2000 ) cesarini arxiv astro - ph/0305075 proposal gamma - ray large area space telescope slac - r-522 ( 1998 ) glast proposal nasa a0 - 99 - 055 - 03 ( 1999 ) navarro astrophys . 462, 563 ( 1996 ) ghigna astrophys 544 * , 616 ( 2000 )hall phys . d 27 2359 ( 1983 martin phys . d 50 2282 ( 1994 ) arxiv hep - ph/9311340 edsjo jcap 0304 001 ( 2003 ) hep - ph/0301106 | 0.50108 | 3,116 | 1,600 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,981 | we correct an alleged contradiction to gallager s capacity theorem for waveform channels as presented in a poster at the 2012 ieee international symposium on information theory . | gallager s capacity theorem ( * ? ? ? * theorem 8.5.1 ) is literally reproduced on p. 1 of the poster along with the figure ( * ? ? ?
* figure 8.5.1 ) plus some explanations taken from gallager s book @xcite . on p. 2 , the so - called gallager channel ( now called gaussian waveform channel ) , i.e. , a gaussian filter with additive white gaussian noise ( awgn ) , is treated as a special instance of gallager s theorem .
on p. 3 , the heat channel , a linear time - varying ( ltv ) filter with awgn , is depicted followed by a characterization of its capacity by water - filling in the time - frequency plane ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 2 ) . finally , on p. 4 , an example of a signal transmission is given aiming at underpinning the apparent contradiction to gallager s theorem in figs . 3 and 4 of the poster .
the curves for the heat channel in the latter two figures are incorrect ; the correct curves are provided in the present publication
. actually tends to infinity ( see the proof of the theorem in @xcite ) ]
evaluation of the double integrals occurring in the water - filling theorem ( * ? ? ? * theorem 2 ) ( cf .
p. 3 of @xcite ) and subsequent elimination of the parameter @xmath0 results in the closed - form representation of the capacity ( in nats per transmission ) of the heat channel , namely @xmath1 ^ 2+o(\alpha\beta)\,(\alpha\beta\rightarrow\infty ) , \label{eq1}\ ] ] where @xmath2 is the inverse function of @xmath3 , and @xmath4 is the standard landau little - o symbol .
( [ eq1 ] ) coincides with the capacity formula ( * ? ? ?
* eq . ( 9 ) ) ( as it should ) .
by reason of the gaussian time window ( see fig .
[ figure_1 ] ) at the input and output side of the ltv filter ( see ( * ? ? ?
* fig . 5 ) and ( * ? ? ?
( 4 ) ) , resp . ) , capacity achieving input / output signals for the heat channel will have the approximate duration @xmath5 ( at least when the input energy is sufficiently high [ but not too high ! ] ) . therefore ,
transition to capacity as a rate should be done as follows . put for the average input energy @xmath6 , where @xmath7 is average power .
then , form the time average @xmath8 . because of eq .
( [ eq1 ] ) it asssumes the value @xmath9 ^ 2\log_2{\mathrm{e}}\;\;\mbox{(bit / s ) } , \label{eq2}\ ] ] where @xmath10 , @xmath11 is the approximate bandwidth in positive frequencies measured in hertz ( cf .
2 ) ) , and @xmath12 is the one - sided noise power spectral density of the awgn .
similarly , for @xmath13 as a function of @xmath14 we obtain the parametric representation @xmath15 ^ 2 \log_2{\mathrm{e}}}\label{eq3a}\\ \frac{\bar{c}(\mathrm{snr})}{w}&=&\frac{1}{2\pi}[w_0(4\pi\mathrm{snr})]^2 \log_2{\mathrm{e}}\;\;(\mbox{bit / s / hz})\label{eq3b}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in fig .
[ figure_2 ] , @xmath13 is plotted against snr ; here , eq .
( [ eq2 ] ) is used . in fig .
[ figure_3 ] , the curve for @xmath13 as a function of @xmath14 is given parametrically by eqs .
( [ eq3a ] ) , ( [ eq3b ] ) . in both figures , in case of the heat channel the label @xmath17 stands for @xmath13 .
figs . 3 and 4 of the poster @xcite should be replaced by figs . 2 and 3 , resp . , of the present publication .
moreover , the caption in ( * ? ? ?
7 ) is to be replaced by
example : @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 bits per transmission ( exact value ) .
" the exact value , by the way , has been computed numerically
. 1 r. g. gallager , _ information theory and reliable communication_. new york , ny : wiley , 1968 .
e. hammerich , see version 1 of this publication ( arxiv:1207.4707v1 ) .
e. hammerich , `` on the heat channel and its capacity , '' _ proc .
information theory _ ,
seoul , korea , 2009 , pp .
e. hammerich , `` on the heat channel and its capacity , '' available online at arxiv:1101.0287v3 . | gallager s capacity theorem theorem 8.5.1 ) reproduced p. 1 figure 8.5.1 ) explanations from gallager s book @xcite p. 2 gallager channel gaussian waveform channel ) gaussian filter with additive white gaussian noise awgn special instance gallager s theorem p. 3 heat channel linear time - varying ltv filter with awgn depicted characterization capacity by water - filling in time - frequency plane theorem 2 ) p. 4 example signal transmission contradiction to gallager s theorem in figs . 3 and 4 curves for heat channel figures incorrect correct curves present publication infinity theorem @xcite evaluation of double integrals in water - filling theorem theorem 2 p. 3 @xcite elimination of parameter @xmath0 results in closed - form representation of capacity in nats per transmission heat channel @xmath1 ^ 2+o(\alpha\beta\infty{eq1 @xmath2 inverse function of @xmath3 @xmath4 standard landau little - o symbol coincides with capacity formula ( * * eq . 9 gaussian time window fig . at input output side of ltv filter5 ) * ? ( 4 ) ) capacity achieving input / output signals for heat channel approximate duration @xmath5 when input energy high not transition to capacity average input energy @xmath6 @xmath7 average power form time average @xmath8 eq eq1 asssumes value @xmath9 2\log_2{\mathrm{e}}{eq2} @xmath10, @xmath11 approximate bandwidth in positive frequencies hertz @xmath12 one - sided noise power spectral density of awgn @xmath13 function of @xmath14 parametric representation @xmath15 ^ 2\log_2{\mathrm{e\label{eq3a}\\{\mathrm{snr{1{2\pi{eq3b}{aligned} fig . figure_2 @xmath13 plotted against snr eq . ( [ eq2 ] ) used figure_3 curve for @xmath13 function of @xmath14 given by eqs . ( [ eq3a ] ) [ eq3b ] )figures heat channel label @xmath17 stands for @xmath13 figs . 3 4 poster @xcite replaced by figs . 2 3 present publication caption ( * ? ? 7 ) replaced by @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 bits per transmission exact value ) exact value computed numerically r. g. gallager information theory reliable communication new york ny wiley 1968. see version 1 publication arxiv:1207.4707v1 ) heat channel capacity information theory seoul korea 2009 available online arxiv:1101.0287v3 | 0.184596 | 1,139 | 586 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
194,995 | it has been known since the pioneering work of onsager and feynman that the statistical mechanics and dynamics of vortices play an essential role in the behavior of superfluids and superconductors .
however , the theory of vortices in quantum fluids remains in a most unsatisfactory state , with many conflicting results in the literature . in this paper
we review the theory of thouless , ao and niu , which gives an expression for the total transverse force acting on a quantized vortex that is in apparent disagreement with the work of iordanskii and of lifshitz and pitaevskii .
in particular , no transverse force proportional to the asymptotic normal fluid velocity was found .
we use two - fluid hydrodynamics to study this discrepancy .
pacs numbers : 67.40.vs , 74.60.ge , 47.37.+q | a comprehensive theory of vortex dynamics in quantum fluids must address phenomena occurring at three different length scales . at the smallest , most microscopic scale , a fully quantum mechanical treatment of a vortex , including its internal structure ,
interaction with elementary excitations such as phonons and rotons , and interaction with disorder , is required at the next
what we shall refer to as intermediate
length scale , one would like to regard a vortex as a classical object , subject to a classical equation of motion . of course , there is no guarantee that we can do this , and , indeed , certain pathologies result from our insistence in doing so , but experience has shown that this classical picture is extremely successful.@xcite there are different ways to formulate the classical approach . if we let @xmath0 denote the position in the @xmath1 plane of the center of an isolated straight vortex line , say , as a function of time , we could hypothesize a phenomenological equation of motion of the form @xmath2 here we have taken the circulation vector @xmath3 of the vortex , a vector parallel to the vortex with a magnitude equal to the circulation , to be along the @xmath4 direction .
the first two terms on the right - hand - side of ( [ equation of motion ] ) are to include all forces linear in the vortex velocity .
the coefficients @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and @xmath7 , which describe the vortex effective mass per unit length , viscous damping force per unit length , and nondissipative transverse force per unit length , respectively , are to be determined from a microscopic theory , as are the `` pinning '' and `` driving '' forces per unit length @xmath8 and @xmath9 .
the latter may depend on the normal and superfluid densities and velocities , and therefore on the vortex position @xmath10 , but do not depend on the vortex velocity . in a superfluid , @xmath8 might describe the force exerted by an externally imposed wire , and @xmath9 would include the superfluid - velocity - dependent part of the magnus force ( see below ) and possibly other vortex - velocity - independent contributions . at the most macroscopic scale one needs to understand how the forces arising at the intermediate scale act to determine the bulk , experimentally observable properties of quantum fluids . the length scale that usually defines this regime is the characteristic inter - vortex distance , and one is interested in coarse - grained properties of the quantum fluid at scales larger than that distance . in superfluids ,
this is the regime where the concept of mutual friction applies .
mutual friction refers to a momentum transfer , with both longitudinal and transverse components , between the normal and superfluid parts of a quantum fluid.@xcite although such an interaction is absent in the two - fluid model itself , the presence of vortices mediate a bulk momentum exchange
. similarly , in superconductors one needs to understand how the lorentz force , pinning forces , and other intermediate - scale forces conspire to determine , say , the hall effect in the mixed state , which depends on the collective motion of a macroscopic number of vortices.@xcite our recent work has focused mostly on the intermediate length - scale regime , namely , the determination of the various forces that act on vortices . after a brief general review of that work we shall discuss our new results on the problem of the iordanskii and lifshitz - pitaevskii forces , which have been subjects of considerable controversy .
the thouless - ao - niu ( tan ) theory@xcite and its generalization to ultraclean type - ii superconductors@xcite start with the appropriate exact many - body hamiltonian and include a pinning potential centered at @xmath10 , which is also the position of the vortex .
the vortex is then dragged with a velocity @xmath11 , and a transverse force @xmath12 is found . here @xmath13 is the canonical momentum density , and the line integral is taken around a large circle enclosing the vortex . evidently , the transverse force is independent of the detailed microscopic structure of the vortex and its interaction with the normal fluid . in a neutral bose or fermi superfluid , @xmath14 and therefore @xmath15 in the normal fluid component ,
viscosity causes vortex - like circulation to diffuse away to the outer boundary , so @xmath16 vanishes in equilibrium , and @xmath17 in a charged superfluid or superconductor , however , the hamiltonian contains a current - current interaction term that modifies the velocity operator . the canonical momentum density can be expressed in terms of the physical , gauge - invariant momentum density @xmath18 , resulting in @xmath19 the second equality in ( [ sc case ] ) follows from the meissner effect , which causes @xmath20 to vanish at large distances , and from flux quantization .
therefore , @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the total mass density of the fluid .
we turn now to a brief discussion of some of the controversies in the theory of intermediate - scale vortex dynamics , focusing on transverse forces , and organized according to the complexity of the quantum fluid in question .
it seems appropriate to start by recalling a result of classical hydrodynamics , the magnus force : when a vortex with circulation @xmath3 is dragged with velocity @xmath11 through an ideal fluid of mass density @xmath23 , a transverse force per unit length @xmath24 acts on the object doing the dragging .
the force is similar to the lift force on an airplane wing .
it is clear from galilean invariance that if the fluid far from the vortex is not at rest , but has a velocity @xmath25 , then the force is instead @xmath26 by analogy , it is reasonable in a neutral bose superfluid at zero temperature to expect that @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the quantized circulation .
of course , writing @xmath29 here instead of @xmath23 is arbitrary , because these are equal at zero temperature .
the controversy begins in the finite - temperature neutral bose superfluid , because galilean invariance allows for a transverse force of the form @xmath30 where @xmath31 and @xmath32 are parameters . the first term in ( [ general sf magnus force ] )
has a simple classical interpretation : it describes a magnus - type force originating from the superfluid component of the fluid ( remembering that it is the superfluid that is circulating ) .
thus classical reasoning would suggest that @xmath33 , and wexler has recently given an elegant proof of this.@xcite to our knowledge there have been no criticisms of wexler s theory . from this classical point - of - view ,
again keeping in mind that it is the superfluid that is circulating here , the second term in ( [ general sf magnus force ] ) would be of a nonhydrodynamic origin .
if present , it would describe a transverse interaction between the vortex and the excitations phonons and rotons of the fluid .
iordanskii@xcite predicted just such an interaction with phonons , and lifshitz and pitaevskii@xcite ( following earlier work by hall and vinen@xcite ) predicted one with rotons .
note , however , that in these works @xmath34 and @xmath35 refer to flow velocities _ near _ the vortex line , whereas our quantities are asymptotic values .
but the tan result ( [ sf transverse force ] ) implies @xmath36 .
when combined with wexler s theory , this implies @xmath37 , i.e. , that there are no transverse iordanskii and lifshitz - pitaevskii forces .
this apparent discrepancy has motivated us to understand better the interaction between a quantized vortex and the normal fluid in a neutral bose system , and to calculate the coefficient @xmath32 in ( [ general sf magnus force ] ) directly .
we shall return to this direct calculation below in section [ two - fluid ] the next controversy concerns the transverse force in a neutral fermi superfluid , also described in the tan theory . according to kopnin and kravtsov,@xcite low - energy quasiparticles in the vortex core also contribute to the transverse force linear in @xmath11 , a contribution not found by tan .
vortices in superconductors inherit all of the above controversies and have additional complexity of their own.@xcite we will not have space to discuss them further .
two ingredients are needed for a microscopic theory of the coefficient @xmath32 in eqn .
( [ general sf magnus force ] ) .
first , one has to solve a vortex - excitation scattering problem .
it is probably correct to use the gross - pitaevskii equation to do this , even though mean field theory is not expected to hold inside the vortex , because the scattering potential is long - ranged .
in fact , the potential is sufficiently long - ranged , and the forward scattering sufficiently singular , that there are several mathematically incorrect scattering calculations present in the literature.@xcite in the scale of lengths greater than the size of the vortex core and less than the mean free path for scattering of excitations by one another , if there is such a range , the dynamics of excitations moving in the slowly varying background of the rotating superfluid is well defined , and in this region the traditional arguments@xcite give a transverse force on the excitations equal to @xmath38 , where @xmath35 is the average normal fluid velocity at a distance of the order of the mean free path from the vortex core , as well as a dissipative longitudinal force . in the region well beyond a mean free path from the vortex core , flow velocities are varying slowly and two - fluid hydrodynamics , which incorporates the basic conservation laws , provides an accurate description .
in particular , the two - fluid version of the navier stokes equation gives the force momentum balance . in this region we have studied how forces generated within a mean free path of the vortex core can be transmitted to large distances.@xcite within a linearized approximation to the two - fluid model the force due to the superfluid flow relative to the vortex is just the ordinary superfluid magnus force @xmath39 , where @xmath34 is the asymptotic value of the superfluid velocity .
this is given for superfluids , as it is for ordinary fluids , by the cross terms , between circulation and the superfluid flow , in the momentum flow tensor and the bernoulli pressure .
there seems to be no possible modification of this even for a fermionic superfluid , such as is suggested by the work of kopnin and kravtsov,@xcite if there is no bulk interaction with a stationary background . for the normal fluid contributions our considerations are quite similar to those of hall and vinen.@xcite in the linear regime the force
is transmitted by the viscous force ( and an accompanying pressure term ) , which is generated by a flow velocity in the direction of the force that increases as the logarithm of the distance from the vortex core .
the asymptotic value of the normal fluid velocity is given by a combination of the value @xmath35 close to the core , and this logarithmically growing term .
the logarithmically growing term has to be cut off at a distance @xmath40 which is determined by the reynolds number of the flow , by the spacing between vortices , or by the diffusion length at the frequency of vortex oscillation . in the limit considered by tan , with vanishingly small normal fluid velocity , and a single vortex in an infinite medium , this
cut - off goes to infinity , and @xmath35 is negligibly small in comparison , so the asymptotic velocity is determined by the logarithmic term , and the force is parallel to the normal fluid flow .
realistically , the logarithm which the cut - off introduces is not necessarily large compared with other parameters in the problem .
even when the iordanskii force is not put in explicitly at the inner boundary , there is some transverse force due to normal fluid flow , but this is proportional to @xmath41^{-2 } \ , v_{\rm n}$ ] , where @xmath42 is the mean free path .
it is not clear how to match conditions close to the core with conditions in the hydrodynamic region , but if it is assumed that the iordanskii force causes @xmath35 close to the core to match the viscous force in the hydrodynamic region , and to be parallel to it , the relative importance of the logarithmic term will depend on the ratio of the kinematic viscosity @xmath43 to the quantum of circulation a large kinematic viscosity will diminish the importance of the logarithmic term in the flow velocity .
this work was supported in part by nsf grant no .
dmr-9813932 , by a research innovation award from the research corporation , and by a sarah moss fellowship . | comprehensive theory of vortex dynamics in quantum fluids phenomena at three length scales smallest microscopic scale quantum mechanical treatment of vortex internal structure interaction with elementary excitations disorder required intermediate length scale vortex as classical object subject to classical equation of motion no guarantee pathologies result from insistence experience classical picture successful. different ways to formulate classical approach @xmath0 position plane of center of isolated straight vortex line function of time hypothesize phenomenological equation of motion of form @xmath2 circulation vector @xmath3 of vortex parallel to vortex magnitude equal to circulation along @xmath4 direction first two terms include all forces linear in vortex velocity coefficients @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 vortex effective mass per unit length viscous damping force nondissipative transverse force per unit length determined from microscopic theory pinning driving forces per unit length @xmath8 and @xmath9 depend on normal superfluid densities velocities vortex position @xmath10 not depend on vortex velocitysuperfluid @xmath8 force imposed wire @xmath9 superfluid - velocity - dependent part magnus force vortex - velocity - independent contributions macroscopic scale understand forces at intermediate scale determine bulk properties quantum fluids length scale defines regime inter - vortex distance in coarse - grained properties quantum fluid at scales larger than distance superfluids concept of mutual friction applies momentum transfer between normal superfluid parts quantum fluid interaction absent in two - fluid model vortices mediate bulk momentum exchange superconductors understand lorentz force pinning forces intermediate - scale forces determine hall effect in mixed state collective motion vortices recent work focused on intermediate length - scale regime determination forces on vortices discuss new results on iordanskii lifshitz - pitaevskii forces subjects controversy thouless - ao - niu ( tan ) theory@xcite generalization to ultraclean type - ii superconductors start with many - body hamiltonian pinning potential at @xmath10 position of vortex vortex dragged with velocity @xmath11 transverse force @xmath12 found@xmath13 canonical momentum density line integral around circle vortex transverse force independent of structure vortex interaction with normal fluid neutral superfluid @xmath14 @xmath15 viscosity causes vortex circulation outer boundary @xmath16 vanishes in equilibrium @xmath17 in charged superfluid hamiltonian contains current - current interaction modifies velocity operator canonical momentum density expressed physical gauge - invariant momentum density @xmath18 @xmath19 second equality follows from meissner effect causes @xmath20 vanish at large distances flux quantization @xmath21 @xmath22 total mass density fluid discussion controversies intermediate - scale vortex dynamics transverse forces complexity quantum fluid classical hydrodynamics magnus force vortex circulation @xmath3 dragged with velocity @xmath11 through ideal fluid mass density @xmath23 transverse force per unit length @xmath24 acts on object force similar to lift force on airplane wingclear from galilean invariance if fluid far from vortex not at rest velocity @xmath25 force is @xmath26 reasonable in neutral bose superfluid at zero temperature expect @xmath27 @xmath28 is quantized circulation writing @xmath29 instead of @xmath23 arbitrary equal at zero temperature controversy begins in finite - temperature neutral bose superfluid galilean invariance allows transverse force of form @xmath30 where @xmath31 @xmath32 parameters first term general sf magnus force ] interpretation describes magnus - type force from superfluid component classical reasoning @xmath33 wexler proof no criticisms of wexler s theory superfluid circulating second term magnus force nonhydrodynamic origin transverse interaction between vortex excitations phonons rotons fluid iordanskii predicted interaction with phonons lifshitz and pitaevskii predicted with rotons @xmath34 and @xmath35 refer to flow velocities near vortex line our quantities are asymptotic values tan result sf transverse force implies @xmath36 combined with wexler s theory implies @xmath37 no transverse iordanskii lifshitz - pitaevskii forces discrepancy motivated understand interaction between quantized vortex normal fluid in neutral bose system calculate coefficient @xmath32 in general sf magnus force directly return to calculation section two - fluid next controversy concerns transverse force in neutral fermi superfluid tan theory kopnin kravtsov low - energy quasiparticles in vortex core contribute to transverse force in @xmath11 not found by tan vortices in superconductors inherit controversies additional complexity two ingredients needed for microscopic theory of coefficient @xmath32 solve vortex - excitation scattering problem use gross - pitaevskii equation field theory vortex scattering potential long - ranged scattering singular several mathematically incorrect scattering calculations literature scale lengths greater than size vortex core less than mean free path for scattering excitations dynamics of excitations moving in varying background rotating superfluid defined traditional arguments give transverse force on excitations equal to @xmath38 @xmath35 is average normal fluid velocity at distance mean free path from vortex core dissipative longitudinal forceregion beyond mean free path vortex core flow velocities varying slowly two - fluid hydrodynamics basic conservation laws provides accurate description two - fluid version navier stokes equation gives force momentum balance studied forces within path vortex core large distances linearized approximation two - fluid model force due to superfluid flow relative vortex ordinary superfluid magnus force @xmath39 @xmath34 asymptotic value superfluid velocity given by cross terms between circulation superfluid flow momentum flow tensor bernoulli pressure no modification for fermionic superfluid no bulk interaction stationary background normal fluid contributions considerations similar to hall and vinen linear regime force transmitted by viscous force pressure term generated flow velocity increases logarithm distance from vortex core asymptotic value normal fluid velocity given by combination value @xmath35 close to core logarithmically growing term growing term cut off at distance @xmath40 determined by reynolds number flow spacing between vortices diffusion length at frequency vortex oscillationlimit by tan small normal fluid velocity single vortex infinite medium cut - off to infinity @xmath35 small asymptotic velocity determined by logarithmic term force parallel to normal fluid flow logarithm cut - off introduces not large compared with other parameters iordanskii force not inner boundary transverse force due to normal fluid flow proportional to @xmath41^{-2 @xmath42 mean free path not match conditions close to core with hydrodynamic region iordanskii force causes @xmath35 core match viscous force hydrodynamic region parallel importance logarithmic term on ratio kinematic viscosity @xmath43 to quantum circulation large kinematic viscosity importance logarithmic term flow velocity work supported by nsf grant dmr-9813932 research innovation award research corporation sarah moss fellowship | 0.436296 | 2,743 | 1,386 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
194,998 | gapless superconductivity can arise when pairing occurs between fermion species with different fermi surface sizes , provided there is a sufficiently large mismatch between fermi surfaces and/or at sufficiently large coupling constant . in gapless states ,
secondary fermi surfaces appear where quasiparticle excitation energy vanishes .
this work focuses on homogeneous and isotropic superfluids in the @xmath0-wave channel , with either zero ( conventional superconductor ) , one , or two spherical fermi surfaces .
the stability conditions for these candidate phases are analyzed .
it is found that gapless states with one fermi surface are stable in the bec region , while gapless states with two fermi surfaces are unstable in all parameter space .
the results can be applied to ultracold fermionic atom systems . | this work focuses on stability conditions and their possible relations to different fermi surface topologies in a superconductor with unequal number densities of fermions ( or unequal chemical potentials)@xcite .
the physics of paired fermion systems with unequal densities of the two fermion species is of interest in the study of two physical systems : ( 1 ) ultracold atomic fermionic gases , where one can freely choose populations in two hyperfine states of the fermionic atom .
experimental work is currently being conducted with these systems .
( 2 ) quark matter in the interior of neutron stars , which is believed to be a color superconductor .
there , the mismatch in quark fermi surfaces is driven by differences in quark masses and electric and color neutrality conditions . in both cases , the ground state of such
a system is the subject of current debate .
the study of fermionic superfluids with imbalanced populations is a novel subject , because until recently , experimental evidence for this situation was elusive . in a superconductor ,
an imbalance in population between spin - up and spin - down electrons can be created by a magnetic field .
however , due to the meissner effect , the magnetic field is either completely shielded from the superconductor bulk or enters in the form of quantized flux lines or vortices .
cold fermionic atomic gases provide new possibilities in the experimental exploration of fermionic superfluids with unequal mixtures of fermions . in cold atoms ,
feshbach resonance permits tuning of the interaction from ( 1 ) attraction and a resulting superfluid of loosely bound pairs ( the bcs regime at @xmath1 ) ; to ( 2 ) repulsion and a resulting bose - einstein condensate of tightly bound molecules ( the bec regime at @xmath2 ) , where @xmath3 is the size of a pair and @xmath4 is the interparticle separation ( or , more precisely , the mean free path ) . with equal mixtures , the bec bcs crossover is smooth , with no phase transition . with asymmetric densities ,
one or more phase transitions are expected , and a more complex phase diagram may result . in the weak coupling regime , a bcs superfluid remains stable as long as the difference in chemical potential is small compared to the pairing gap , @xmath5 ; the gap prevents the excess unpaired atoms from entering the superfluid state . by either increasing the mismatch or reducing the binding energy ( and hence decreasing the gap ) , a quantum phase transition from the superfluid to normal state takes place , and superflidity ceases .
the point at which the phase transition occurs is known as the clogston limit , which can be estimated as @xmath6 , where @xmath7 is the fermi energy .
thus only an exponentially small population imbalance is allowed in weak coupling . in strong coupling , as one approaches feshbach resonance , the situation is quite different . on the bec side , superfluidity with imbalanced population
is robust over a wide range of parameter space .
surprisingly , on the bcs side , macroscopic imbalance is also possible in a superfluid state , possibly due to the formation of a gapless superfluid at strong coupling .
this gapless superfluid incorporates large numbers of unpaired fermions which reside at the secondary fermi surfaces .
here , we consider stability conditions for gapless states with different fermi surface topologies .
we consider two species of nonrelativistic fermions , @xmath8 with the same mass but with different chemical potentials , @xmath9 .
there is an attractive interaction only between different species of fermions , @xmath10 .
the order parameter is @xmath11 where @xmath12 , it defines pairing in the singlet channel , spin @xmath13 , @xmath14\times [ 2]=[1]+[3]$ ] .
the order parameter breaks the original group associated with conservation of particle numbers of each species down to the diagonal subgroup associated with conservation of difference in particle numbers , @xmath15 which is invariant under simultaneous rotation @xmath16 .
total number of particles is not conserved .
formally , one can express this pattern of symmetry breaking by gauging the theory .
we introduce two external gauge fields , and couple each species of fermions to its gauge field , @xmath17 couples to @xmath18 with @xmath19 and @xmath20 couples to @xmath21 with @xmath22 , that is reflected by the generators of the gauge group , @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
according to the symmetry breaking pattern , gauge fields mix in a superconductor , rotated sum of fields @xmath25 is screened with non - zero meissner mass via andersen - higgs mechanism , @xmath26 corresponding to @xmath27 , and rotated difference of fields @xmath28 propagates in a superconductor unscreened , meissner mass is zero @xmath29 corresponding to @xmath30 .
there is a different mixing of gauge fields in case of debye masses . in qcd , with color and electromagnetic gauge groups , @xmath31 , mixing of gauge fields
is more complicated . we treat four - fermion interaction on a mean field level .
we integrate over the fermions , obtain fermion determinant , @xmath32\ , .
\label{part}\ ] ] we use the nambu - gorkov formalism with particle - hole basis , @xmath33 . inverse fermion propagator and gauge field are @xmath34 matrices in this basis , including the nambu - gorkov and two fermion species indices , @xmath35^{-1 } & \phi^- \\ \phi^+ & [ g_0 ^ -]^{-1 } \end{array}\right ) \ , , \ ] ] where the inverse free fermion propagators are @xmath36^{-1 } = i\partial_t \pm \frac{\nabla^2}{2 m } \pm \mu$ ] , and we have abbreviated for the gauge fields @xmath37 with @xmath38 and @xmath39 . performing derivative expansion and collecting terms quadratic in the gauge field , we produce fermion loops , @xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 .
debye mass in one - loop is defined by the temporal component of polarization operator , meissner mass is given by the spatial component , @xmath44 and @xmath45 , where @xmath46 .
screening masses are given@xcite @xmath47 \ , , \nonumber\\ m_{m , ab}^2&= & \frac{1}{2m}\lim_{p\to 0}\frac{t}{v}\sum_k \left(\phantom{\frac{k^2}{m}}\hspace{-0.5 cm } \delta_{ab}{\rm tr}[s(k)\bar{\gamma}_a^2]\right . \label{screening } \\ & + & \left.\frac{k^2}{2m}\,[1-(\hat{p}\cdot\hat{k})^2]\,{\rm tr}[s(k)\gamma_a^+s(k - p)\gamma_b^+]\right)\ , , \nonumber % \label{screening}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath48 is the fermion propagator and we have introduced the following matrices in nambu - gorkov space , @xmath49 and @xmath50 . physically , debye mass to all loops , including ladder diagrams , is equivalent to compressibility of a system , and meissner mass can be associated with the density of superconducting fermions .
these @xmath51 matrices in two - fermion space shall be evaluated in the following section in order to obtain stability conditions for gapless superconductors .
one may derive the pressure from the partition function in ( [ part ] ) using the cornwall - jackiw - tomboulis formalism .
the pressure is the negative of the effective potential at its stationary point ( i.e. , with the propagators determined to extremize the effective potential ) .
the fermionic part of the pressure is @xmath52 + \gamma_2[{\cal s}]$ ] , where @xmath53 is the tree - level fermion propagator in nambu - gorkov space and @xmath54 $ ] is the sum of all two - particle irreducible diagrams .
the number densities is defined @xmath55 .
the number susceptibility @xmath56 is defined as the derivative of the number density with respect to the chemical potential ( at constant volume and temperature ) . using the expression for the pressure , we obtain@xcite @xmath57 \nonumber\\ & -&\,\frac{1}{2g_a}\frac{t}{v}\sum_k{\rm tr}\left[\gamma_a^-{\cal s}(k)\frac{\partial \sigma(k ) } { \partial\mu_b}{\cal s}(k)\right ] \
, , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath58 is the fermion self - energy , @xmath59 . the first term on the right - hand side of this equation is given by the one - loop result for the electric screening mass , cf . eq . ( [ screening ] ) . for the second term , we assume that the self - energy @xmath58 depends on @xmath7 only through the gap , then we obtain@xcite @xmath60 in general , the self - energy @xmath58 contains terms of any number of fermion loops .
consequently , the number susceptibility contains terms of arbitrary many fermion loops too , corresponding to the exact debye mass including all possible perturbative insertions .
remarkably , the free fermion result for @xmath56 , i.e. @xmath61 , gives the one - loop result for @xmath62 .
susceptibility is equivalent to compressibility of a system .
we shall use eq .
( [ chidef ] ) in the following section to compute the number susceptibility .
as this equation shows , it goes beyond the one - loop result for the electric screening mass .
we consider three cases distinguished by how many zeros quasiparticle dispersion has , @xmath63 , where @xmath7 is the average chemical potential and @xmath64 is the difference between potentials , fig .
[ figoccupation ] . in this case ,
number of zeros is equivalent to number of the fermi surfaces .
no zeros corresponds to the fully gapped state . in case of one fermi surface ,
momenta outside the fermi surface contribute to the pairing , while the excess of fermions resides inside the fermi ball . in case of two fermi surfaces
, the excess of fermions resides between the two fermi surfaces in momentum space .
as was noticed by son , apart from number of zeros , dispersion can have two different characteristic behaviors , distinguished by the position of the minimum .
minimum is located at nonzero momentum for positive @xmath65 , and corresponds to bcs , and minimum shifts to @xmath66 for negative @xmath7 , and corresponds to bec .
this behavior manifests itself in stability conditions .
we depict different topologies which are distinguished by the number of fermi surfaces on the phase diagram in dimensionless average chemical potential @xmath67 and difference in chemical potentials @xmath68 , the gap is the energy scale , in fig .
[ figglobal ] regions between the solid lines .
we have fully gapped @xmath69 , and gapless states with one @xmath70 and two @xmath71 fermi surfaces . at small mismatch
, there is a fully gapped state @xmath69 , which is at positive @xmath65 and @xmath5 , bcs , and at small and negative @xmath65 , @xmath72 , bec .
increasing mismatch , when mismatch is at least larger than the gap , there is a gapless state with one fermi surface @xmath70 when @xmath7 is around the feshbach resonance , @xmath73 , and gapless state with two fermi surfaces @xmath71 for positive @xmath7 restricted from below , @xmath74 .
we therefore expect that @xmath70 exists at strong coupling , while @xmath71 probably exists only at weak coupling .
the question we are solving here is , `` what is the ground state in a degenerate fermi system with asymmetric number densities of fermions ? '' .
we avoid solving for the ground state explicitly .
instead , we check stability criteria , positive definite eigenvalues of screening masses and number susceptibility .
if stability conditions are satisfied , homogeneous superconducting gapless state is indeed the ground state in this parameter range .
if stability conditions are not satisfied , the alternative state may be realized as the ground state .
these include loff , spatially separated mixtures , normal ( not superconducting ) states .
we analyze stability conditions , eq .
( [ screening ] ) and eq .
( [ chidef ] ) , in all parameter space @xmath75 , and depict stable / unstable regions together with topology regions , fig .
[ figglobal ] left panel . debye mass e.v .
are positive in all parameter space , hence debye mass does not impose a constraint .
all entries for the meissner mass matrix are the same , it is trivial to diagonalize .
we obtain@xcite @xmath29 corresponding to the unbroken sector @xmath30 , and @xmath76 corresponding to the broken group @xmath27 , where @xmath77 , which defines the dashed - dotted ( blue online ) curve in fig .
[ figglobal ] left panel .
it renders all states between the dashed - dotted curve and the solid vertical line unstable .
there is a strip left in gapless superconductor state with two fermi surfaces @xmath71 which is stable , gray area . @xmath69 and @xmath70 are stable with respect to @xmath78 everywhere . in magnetic sector , mixing does not depend on chemical potentials and it is defined by the pattern of symmetry breaking . in electric sector , mixing depends on chemical potentials , e.g. in qcd mixing depends on @xmath64 . mixing in electric and magnetic sectors is the same only for the fully gapped case . analyzing the number susceptibility matrix , eq .
( [ chidef ] ) , we obtain@xcite the expression defining the sign of e.v
. , which is very similar in structure to that for the meissner mass , see expression for @xmath79 , @xmath80 . here , we defined @xmath81 and @xmath82 with elliptic integrals @xmath83^{3/2}$ ] and @xmath84^{3/2}$ ] , and @xmath85 are zeros of @xmath86 with @xmath87 , @xmath88 . in expression for @xmath89 one should put @xmath90 when applied to @xmath70 region . it defines the dashed ( red online ) line , and it renders all states between dashed and solid vertical lines unstable .
thus all @xmath71 states are unstable , and there is a strip in @xmath70 which is stable , dark gray area .
@xmath69 is stable everywhere .
stable states with respect to @xmath56 correspond to local maximum of pressure .
we obtained stable regions which are local maxima of pressure , fig .
[ figglobal ] left panel .
now we consider global maxima , fig .
[ figglobal ] right panel .
for this we compare pressure of the superconducting and normal states .
superconducting states which pressure is higher than that of the normal state are stable , @xmath91 .
the dashed - dotted ( blue on line ) line is @xmath92 , it renders all states above and to the right of it unstable .
all unstable regions with respect to the screening masses and number susceptibility are subset of unstable region with respect to the pressure . in a weak coupling , the vertical dashed - dotted line reproduces the known clogston limit , @xmath93 , above which bcs is unstable .
the global stability line cuts through the stable strip of @xmath70 state , below is a stable superconducting state , above is a metastable state .
both lines coincide at large mismatches .
currently , experiments are being performed with unequal mixtures of fermions to map superfluid regions as a function of population imbalance , interaction strength and temperature .
the experimental signature of superfluidity is the existence of vortices , which prove phase coherence in a sample . | work focuses on stability conditions relations to fermi surface topologies in superconductor with unequal densities fermions chemical potentials physics of paired fermion systems unequal densities in study systems ultracold atomic fermionic gases populations in two hyperfine states fermionic atom experimental work conducted with quark matter in neutron stars color superconductor mismatch in quark fermi surfaces driven by differences in quark masses electric color neutrality conditions ground state system subject of debate study of fermionic superfluids with imbalanced populations novel experimental evidence elusive superconductor imbalance in population between spin - up - down electrons created by magnetic field to meissner effect magnetic field shielded from superconductor bulk or enters quantized flux lines vortices cold fermionic atomic gases provide new possibilities exploration fermionic superfluids with unequal mixtures fermions cold atoms feshbach resonance permits tuning interaction from attraction pairs to repulsion condensate tightly bound molecules @xmath3 size of pair interparticle separation mean free pathequal mixtures bec bcs crossover smooth no phase transition asymmetric densities more phase transitions expected complex phase diagram weak coupling regime bcs superfluid stable difference chemical potential small pairing gap @xmath5 gap prevents excess unpaired atoms entering superfluid state increasing mismatch or reducing binding energy gap quantum phase transition superfluid to normal superflidity ceases phase transition clogston limit estimated as @xmath6 @xmath7 fermi energy small population imbalance allowed weak coupling strong coupling different bec side superfluidity imbalanced population robust parameter space bcs side macroscopic imbalance possible superfluid state gapless superfluid strong coupling gapless superfluid incorporates large unpaired fermions secondary fermi surfaces stability conditions for gapless states different fermi surface topologies two species nonrelativistic fermions same mass different chemical potentials @xmath9 attractive interaction between different species fermions @xmath10 order parameter @xmath11 @xmath12 defines pairing in singlet channel @xmath13 @xmath14 2=[1]+[3]order parameter breaks group conservation particle numbers to subgroup difference @xmath15 invariant under simultaneous rotation @xmath16 total number particles not conserved symmetry breaking by gauging theory introduce two external gauge fields couple each species fermions to gauge field @xmath17 reflected by generators gauge @xmath23 symmetry breaking gauge fields mix in superconductor rotated sum fields @xmath25 screened with non - zero meissner mass difference fields propagates superconductor unscreened meissner mass zero @xmath29 different mixing gauge fields debye masses qcd color electromagnetic gauge groups @xmath31 mixing complicated treat four - fermion interaction on mean field level integrate over fermions obtain fermion determinant @xmath32 use nambu - gorkov formalism with particle - hole basis @xmath33fermion propagator gauge field @xmath34 matrices nambu - gorkov fermion species indices @xmath35^{-1 } \phi^- ^+ -^{-1 }{array} inverse fermion propagators @xmath36^{-1 }\partial_t} abbreviated gauge fields @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 derivative expansion collecting terms quadratic gauge field produce fermion loops @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 mass one - loop defined temporal component polarization operator meissner mass spatial component @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 screening masses @xmath47 m_{m^2&=\frac{1}{2m}{t}{v}_k{k^2}{-0.5 cm }\delta{ab}}{\gamma}_a^2]{screening }{k^2}{2m}[1-(\hat{p}{k})^2] tr}(k)\gamma_a^+s(k - p)\gamma_b^+]\right\nonumber %{screening}{aligned} @xmath48 fermion propagator introduced matrices nambu - gorkov space @xmath49 @xmath50 debye mass loops equivalent compressibility meissner mass density superconducting fermions @xmath51 matrices two - fermion space evaluated stability conditions gapless superconductors pressure partition function cornwall - jackiw - tomboulis formalism pressure negative effective potential stationary point propagators fermionic part pressure @xmath52 + \gamma_2[{ s}] @xmath53 tree - level fermion propagator - gorkov @xmath54 sum two - particle irreducible diagrams number densities defined @xmath55 number susceptibility @xmath56 derivative number density chemical potential constant volume temperatureexpression pressure obtain@xcite @xmath57\nonumber\\\frac{1}{2g_a}{t}{v}\sum_k{\rm tr}\left\gamma_a^-{\cal s}(k)\frac{\partial \sigma(k )\mu_b}{\cal s}(k)\right{aligned} @xmath58 fermion self - energy @xmath59 first term one - loop result electric screening mass second term self - energy @xmath58 depends on @xmath7 gap obtain@xcite @xmath60 self - energy @xmath58 contains fermion loops number susceptibility contains arbitrary fermion loops exact debye mass perturbative insertions free fermion result @xmath56 @xmath61 one - loop result @xmath62 susceptibility equivalent compressibility system eq . ( [ chidef ] ) compute number susceptibility equation beyond one - loop result electric screening mass consider three cases zeros quasiparticle dispersion @xmath63 @xmath7 average chemical potential @xmath64 difference potentials number zeros equivalent to fermi surfaces no zeros fully gapped stateone fermi surface momenta outside contribute to pairing excess inside ball two surfaces excess between in momentum space dispersion two behaviors by position minimum at nonzero momentum for positive @xmath65 corresponds to bcs shifts to @xmath66 for negative @xmath7 corresponds to bec behavior manifests in stability conditions different topologies distinguished by number fermi surfaces phase diagram average chemical potential @xmath67 difference @xmath68 gap is energy scale solid lines fully gapped @xmath69 gapless states with one @xmath70 two @xmath71 surfaces small mismatch fully gapped state @xmath69 at positive @xmath65 @xmath5 , bcs small negative @xmath65 @xmath72 , bec increasing mismatch larger than gap gapless state with one fermi surface @xmath70 resonance gapless state with two surfaces @xmath71 for positive @xmath7 @xmath70 exists at strong coupling @xmath71 at weak coupling question ground state in degenerate fermi system with asymmetric densities fermions ? avoid solving ground statecheck stability criteria positive eigenvalues of screening masses number susceptibility if conditions satisfied homogeneous superconducting gapless state ground state if not satisfied alternative state as ground state include loff separated mixtures normal not superconducting states analyze stability conditions screening chidef in parameter space @xmath75 depict stable / unstable regions topology regions debye mass e.v positive in all parameter space impose constraint entries for meissner mass matrix same trivial to diagonalize obtain @xmath29 unbroken sector @xmath30 @xmath76 broken group @xmath27 @xmath77 defines dashed - dotted curve renders all states between dotted curve solid vertical line unstable strip left in gapless superconductor state with two fermi surfaces @xmath71 stable @xmath69 @xmath70 stable @xmath78 magnetic sector mixing depend on chemical potentials defined by pattern symmetry breaking electric sector mixing depends on chemical potentials mixing electric magnetic same for fully gapped case number susceptibility matrixobtain@xcite expression defining sign e.v. similar meissner mass expression @xmath79 @xmath80 defined @xmath81 @xmath82 elliptic integrals @xmath83{3/2 @xmath85 zeros of @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 expression @xmath89 @xmath90 applied @xmath70 region defines dashed line renders states between dashed vertical lines unstable @xmath71 states unstable strip in @xmath70 stable @xmath69 stable everywhere stable states @xmath56 correspond local maximum pressure obtained stable regions local maxima pressure consider global maxima compare pressure superconducting normal states superconducting states higher than normal stable @xmath91 dashed - dotted line @xmath92 renders states above right unstable unstable regions screening masses number susceptibility subset of unstable region pressure weak coupling vertical dashed - dotted line reproduces clogston limit @xmath93 above bcs unstable global stability line cuts through stable strip @xmath70 state below stable superconducting state above metastable state lines coincide at large mismatchesexperiments performed with unequal mixtures fermions map superfluid regions population imbalance interaction strength temperature signature superfluidity vortices prove phase coherence | 0.616669 | 3,538 | 1,824 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,002 | in this note , among other things , we show : 1 . there are periodic wild @xmath0-frieze patterns whose entries are positive integers .
2 . there are non - periodic @xmath0-frieze patterns whose entries are positive integers .
3 . there is an @xmath1-frieze pattern whose entries are positive integers and with infinitely many different entries . in this note , among other things ,
we show : there are periodic wild slk - frieze patterns whose entries are positive integers .
there are non - periodic slk - frieze patterns whose entries are positive integers .
there is an sl3-frieze pattern whose entries are positive integers and with infinitely many different entries .
conway - coxeter frieze patterns are arrays of positive integers bounded by diagonals of ones such that every adjacent @xmath2 subdeterminant is one .
they were introduced in @xcite and classified for the first time in @xcite .
more than @xmath3 years later , they appeared in a natural way in several other contexts , for instance in the fields of cluster algebras and of nichols algebras . among the generalizations of frieze patterns that have been introduced since their first appearance ( see @xcite ) are the @xmath0-frieze patterns which we will discuss in more detail in this note .
in the literature , @xmath0-frieze patterns satisfy an @xmath0-condition ( adjacent @xmath4 subdeterminants are @xmath5 ) , usually they consist of integers , and sometimes the entries are required to be positive .
for example , the array @xmath6 is an @xmath1-frieze pattern . in the case of tame friezes ,
i.e. when all adjacent @xmath7-subdeterminants are zero , these three conditions appear to be very natural ; on the one hand they imply that the entries of the frieze are specializations of variables of a cluster algebra , on the other hand , positivity has a nice geometric interpretation .
integrality could turn out to be natural because of some yet unknown representation theoretical motivation ( as for example given by the nichols algebras in the case of conway - coxeter friezes , see @xcite , @xcite ) .
however , in the wild ( not tame ) case , the examples presented in this note suggest that the usual conditions on the entries do not seem to be the natural ones .
in fact , the determinants of the adjacent @xmath8 submatrices in an @xmath0-frieze pattern will probably play a more important role than the entries of the frieze themselves . and
we believe that to assume that these determinants are nonzero ( the frieze is then tame ) is more natural than to assume positivity of the entries .
we exhibit some facts on tame friezes in the second section . in the last section we provide many examples of wild @xmath0-friezes illustrating that it is probably hopeless to classify all wild friezes ( even when the entries are positive integers ) , although to my knowledge , no wild friezes with positive integral entries were known before . *
acknowledgement : * i would like to thank c. bessenrodt , t. holm , p. jrgensen , and s. morier - genoud for calling my attention to some of the questions addressed here and for many further valuable comments . | @xmath0-frieze patterns have been considered for the first time in @xcite with a slightly more special definition . meanwhile , many papers have treated different types of @xmath0-patterns .
let us shortly recapitulate some definitions and results .
let @xmath9 , @xmath10 .
an _ @xmath0-frieze pattern _ ( or _
_ @xmath0-frieze__for short ) is an array @xmath11 of the form @xmath12 where there are @xmath13 zeros on the left and right in each row , @xmath14 are numbers in some field , and such that every ( complete ) adjacent @xmath4 submatrix has determinant @xmath5
. it may be convenient to extend the pattern to the right and to the left by repeating the rows ; in this case one has to multiply every second repetition by @xmath15 : @xmath16 we call @xmath17 the _ height _ of @xmath11 .
we call the frieze @xmath11 * _ integral _ if all @xmath14 are in @xmath18 , * _ non - zero _ if @xmath19 for all @xmath20 , * _ positive _ if all @xmath14 are positive real numbers , * _ periodic _ if there exists an @xmath21 such that @xmath22 for all @xmath23 and @xmath24 , * _ _ specialized__if any adjacent @xmath8 submatrix not containing too many zeros from the border has nonzero determinant , * _ tame _ if all adjacent @xmath7 submatrices have determinant @xmath25 , * _ wild _ if it is not tame
. sometimes it will be useful to view the extended @xmath11 as a matrix @xmath26 , where @xmath27 and thus @xmath28 . 1 .
conway - coxeter friezes are exactly the integral positive @xmath29-friezes .
they are all tame , specialized , and periodic .
2 . extending the array @xmath30 periodically ( in all directions ) we obtain a tame integral positive @xmath1-frieze .
it has been proved several times in the literature that tame friezes are periodic , see for example @xcite .
the main reason is ( compare @xcite ) : let @xmath32 be a tame @xmath0-friezeand denote @xmath33 then the matrices @xmath34 are all equal for fixed @xmath35 and @xmath36 , and they are of the form @xmath37 where the last column has alternating signs and @xmath38 if the frieze is positive .
since @xmath11 is tame , it is periodic with period @xmath39 . thus the sequence of @xmath40 is periodic , and @xmath41 .
further , the complete frieze pattern is uniquely determined by this sequence of @xmath40 , thus by a sequence of @xmath39 tuples of the form @xmath42 .
an interesting question concerning tame friezes is : there are only finitely many tame integral positive @xmath1-friezes of height @xmath43 .
more precisely , the number of such friezes could be @xmath44 .
notice that there are only finitely many tame integral positive @xmath29-friezes ( see for example @xcite ) , that there are only finitely many tame integral positive @xmath1-friezes of height less than @xmath43 ( @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 of heights @xmath48 resp . ) , but that there are infinitely many tame integral positive @xmath1-friezes of height greater than @xmath43 ( see @xcite ) .
notice also that the examples in section [ wfp ] show that there are infinitely many wild integral positive @xmath0-friezes of a fixed height .
the ( apparently ) most useful identity in the context of @xmath0-friezesis sylvester s identity : if we denote @xmath49 the determinant of the @xmath50 adjacent submatrix at position @xmath51 in the array @xmath52 ( i.e. @xmath53 ) , then @xmath54 for @xmath55 ( assume @xmath56 ) .
[ cornerpos ] if @xmath57 are positive , then @xmath58 is positive as well .
specialized@xmath0-friezesare tame by equation ( [ impeq ] ) for @xmath59 : @xmath60 if @xmath11 is a specialized@xmath0-frieze , then it is uniquely determined by any sequence of @xmath13 successive rows .
if we choose @xmath61 , @xmath62 , @xmath63 to be transcendent and algebraically independent , then @xmath11 is specialized .
replacing every entry @xmath64 in @xmath11 by @xmath65 we obtain the _ dual _ frieze @xmath66 .
if @xmath11 is tame , then @xmath66 is a transposed , translated copy of @xmath11 ( see @xcite or @xcite ) . thus : a tame frieze is specializedif and only if it is nonzero .
but is there a tame frieze which is not specialized ?
yes : extending the array @xmath67 periodically ( in all directions ) we obtain a tame but not specializedintegral @xmath1-frieze .
the following lemma ( together with the fact that tame friezes are periodic ) generalizes the main result of @xcite . if @xmath11 is an @xmath0-friezesuch that @xmath68 then @xmath11 is specialized(and thus tame and periodic ) .
it suffices to prove ( see ( i ) and ( ii ) below ) that ( [ lemass ] ) holds for the next sequence of @xmath13 rows of the pattern : induction then gives @xmath69 for @xmath70 , @xmath71 , and @xmath72 .
but then ( [ lemass ] ) also holds for the frieze given by @xmath73 .
the same argument thus shows that @xmath69 for @xmath70 , @xmath71 , and all @xmath36 .
in particular , the case @xmath74 implies that @xmath11 is specialized .
\(i ) let @xmath75 .
then @xmath76 , @xmath77 , and @xmath78 are positive by ( [ lemass ] ) ( where @xmath79 if @xmath59 ) , @xmath80 , and @xmath81 because it is on the border of the frieze .
thus by corollary [ cornerpos ] for @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath75 , we get @xmath84 .
induction over @xmath85 yields @xmath86 for @xmath87 as well ( notice that we always have @xmath81 ) .
\(ii ) but then we can move to the next entries to the right , @xmath88 , @xmath89 : as before , @xmath90 , @xmath91 , and @xmath92 are positive by ( [ lemass ] ) , and @xmath93 by the induction in ( i ) .
hence by an induction over @xmath35 and for each @xmath35 an induction over @xmath85 ( like in ( i ) ) we obtain @xmath94 for all @xmath95 and @xmath96 .
are there wild @xmath0-friezes ? yes : but what about non - periodic wild friezes ?
the key difference between tame and wild friezes is : if @xmath11 is a wild @xmath0-frieze , then there exist @xmath13 successive rows which do not uniquely determine the following row by the @xmath0-condition .
this happens if and only if some adjacent @xmath8 submatrix within these rows has determinant zero .
define a directed graph @xmath98 which has the set of @xmath99-tuples of vectors in @xmath100 as vertices and such that two tuples @xmath101 and @xmath102 are connected by an edge @xmath103 if @xmath104 and if @xmath105 satisfy the @xmath0-condition when embedded into a frieze . in this example , @xmath106 .
we choose @xmath107 vertices in the graph @xmath108 : let @xmath109 @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath113 @xmath114 now putting the pieces @xmath115 together , where successive pieces overlap with one row and according to the following subgraph of @xmath108 , wild friezes really are wild . figure [ fig_wildgraphs ] consists of two further examples of subgraphs of @xmath98 .
every closed path corresponds to a periodic integral positive @xmath1-frieze .
as above , we may construct infinitely many non periodic friezes from these pictures .
( of course , we have omitted a list of the corresponding vertices . )
we now display a @xmath1-frieze which is integral , positive , not periodic , and with unbounded entries .
let @xmath119 , and denote by @xmath120 the array displayed in figure [ q0q1 ] where the entries @xmath121 are given in figure [ entri ] .
see figure [ q0q1 ] for examples .
one can check that concatenating @xmath137 produces an integral , positive @xmath1-frieze in which the entries increase without limit .
the integrality comes from the fact that the above formulas are expressions for integral recursions . for example
, @xmath138 satisfies @xmath139 we computed this example with the following technique .
start with an arbitrary vertex in @xmath98 and successively construct adjacent vertices ( with entries within a certain bound ) .
this will produce a graph with loops and many branches .
some of them turn out to be leaves or `` dead ends '' ( at least we find no continuation within the bounds ) . now , after removing some dead ends , we look for a longest path in our constructed subgraph .
then we look for a pattern among the vertices on the path . | @xmath0-frieze patterns considered first time in @xcite special definition many papers treated different types-patterns recapitulate definitions results @xmath9 @xmath0-frieze pattern array @xmath11 form @xmath12 @xmath13 zeros left right each row @xmath14 numbers field adjacent @xmath4 submatrix has determinant @xmath5 extend pattern right left repeating rows multiply second repetition by @xmath15 @xmath16 call @xmath17 height of @xmath11 frieze @xmath11 integral if all @xmath14 in @xmath18 non - zero @xmath19 @xmath20 positive if @xmath14 positive numbers periodic @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 specialized__if adjacent @xmath8 submatrix zeros nonzero determinant tame if all adjacent @xmath7 submatrices have determinant @xmath25 wild if not tame view extended @xmath11 as matrix @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 conway - coxeter friezes are integral positive @xmath29-friezes all tame specialized periodicextending array @xmath30 periodically obtain tame integral positive @xmath1-frieze proved tame friezes periodic @xcite let @xmath32 be tame @xmath0-friezeand denote @xmath33 matrices @xmath34 equal for fixed @xmath35 @xmath36 form @xmath37 last column alternating signs @xmath38 frieze positive @xmath11 tame periodic with period @xmath39 sequence of @xmath40 periodic @xmath41 complete frieze pattern determined by sequence @xmath40 sequence @xmath39 tuples form @xmath42 finitely many tame integral positive @xmath1-friezes of height @xmath43 number could be @xmath44 finitely many tame integral positive @xmath29-friezes positive @xmath1-friezes height less than @xmath43 infinitely many tame positive @xmath1-friezes height greater than @xmath43 examples in section [ wfp ] show infinitely many wild integral positive @xmath0-friezes of fixed heightuseful identity @xmath0-friezesis sylvester s identity denote @xmath49 determinant @xmath50 submatrix position @xmath51 array @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 for @xmath55 @xmath56 ) @xmath57 positive @xmath58 positive specialized@xmath0-friezesare tame equation for @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath11 specialized@xmath0-frieze determined by @xmath13 rows choose @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 transcendent algebraically independent @xmath11 specialized replacing @xmath64 @xmath11 by @xmath65 dual frieze @xmath66 if @xmath11 tame @xmath66 transposed copy @xmath11 tame frieze specializedif nonzero not specialized extending array @xmath67 periodically tame not specializedintegral @xmath1-frieze tame friezes periodic generalizes main result @xcite if @xmath11 @xmath0-friezesuch @xmath68 @xmath11 specialized tame periodicprove [ lemass ] ) holds next sequence @xmath13 rows induction gives @xmath69 for @xmath70 @xmath72 lemass holds frieze @xmath73 argument shows @xmath69 for @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath36 case @xmath74 implies @xmath11 specialized @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 positive by lemass ] ) @xmath79 @xmath59 @xmath80 @xmath81 border frieze corollary [ cornerpos ] @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath75 get @xmath84 induction over @xmath85 yields @xmath86 for @xmath87 always have @xmath81 ) move next entries @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 positive by [ lemass ] @xmath93 by induction i ) induction over @xmath35 induction over @xmath85 obtain @xmath94 for @xmath95 @xmath96wild @xmath0-friezes yes non - periodic wild friezes ? key difference tame wild @xmath11 wild-frieze @xmath13 rows determine following row @xmath0-condition adjacent @xmath8 submatrix determinant zero define directed graph @xmath98 @xmath99-tuples vectors @xmath100 vertices two tuples @xmath101 @xmath102 connected by edge @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105 satisfy @xmath0-condition frieze example @xmath106 choose @xmath107 vertices graph @xmath108 @xmath109 pieces @xmath115 together pieces overlap one row subgraph @xmath108 wild friezes are wild figure [ fig_wildgraphs ] two examples subgraphs @xmath98 closed path corresponds to periodic integral positive @xmath1-frieze construct many non periodic friezes from pictures omitted corresponding vertices display @xmath1-frieze integral positive not periodic unbounded entries @xmath119 denote @xmath120 array figure [ q0q1 ] entries @xmath121 figure concatenating @xmath137 produces integral positive @xmath1-frieze entries increase without limitintegrality from formulas for integral recursions @xmath138 satisfies @xmath139 computed example with technique start with arbitrary vertex in @xmath98 construct adjacent vertices with entries within certain bound graph with loops many branches some leaves or dead ends no continuation within bounds after removing dead ends look for longest path in subgraph for pattern among vertices | 0.344191 | 2,233 | 1,236 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,005 | we study the susy / non - susy duality proposed by aganagic et al . from type iia string and m - theory perspectives . we find that our brane configuration generalizes the so - called @xmath0 seiberg - witten theory on the one hand , and provides a way to realize non - susy vacua by intersecting ns5-branes on the other hand .
we also argue how the partial susy breaking from @xmath1 down to @xmath2 can be clearly visualized through the brane picture .
[ cols= " < " , ] finally , we comment on the partial susy breaking from @xmath1 to @xmath2 through the above brane picture .
the partial susy breaking is discussed in @xcite for abelian gauge group .
the non - abelian generalization is well investigated and established by authors of @xcite . according to these early works ,
@xmath1 theory is firstly perturbed by introducing a general prepotential of the form and its susy is broken down to @xmath2 thereof upon adding fayet - iliopoulos ( fi ) parameters . as mentioned throughout this paper ,
the prepotential @xmath3 describes how ns5-branes get deformed in @xmath4-space , see figure [ partial susy ] ( a ) .
three fi parameters correspond to the relative position of two ns5-branes in @xmath5-space .
henceforth , turning on fi parameters means that two ns5-branes are separated from each other in @xmath5-space .
in addition , a new direction by which the bare coupling constant is measured should be defined due to the presence of fi parameters . in figure [ partial susy ] ( a ) , initial positions of d4-branes are not fixed .
but if d4-branes still remain at their initial positions , they become non - parallel when the curved ns5-brane is pulled along @xmath6 , see figure [ partial susy ] ( b ) .
in other words , susy can no longer be maintained for an off - shell choice of @xmath7 vev .
to recover susy , d4-branes should be re - distributed appropriately at critical loci , i.e. @xmath8 ( on - shell condition ) .
now , since susy is recovered to @xmath2 , we can as well recognize the tree - level superpotential as @xmath9 with coefficients rescaled suitably , see figure [ partial susy ] ( c ) . to this end , the partial susy breaking mechanism can thus be understood pictorially from the _ extended _ brane configuration .
the above argument is valid only for the classical ( uv ) theory . in order to extend this picture to the full quantum theory
, we need to replace the ns5/d4 system with a mqcd curve . pulling out
one ns5-brane then corresponds to deforming the curve .
the projective information of the mqcd curve contains both the _ extended _ sw curve and loop equation ( or , alternatively , generalized konishi anomaly equation ) of @xmath2 theory .
therefore , it is interesting to see how these aspects transform according to the partial susy breaking deformation of the curve . | so far , we have shown how the susy / non - susy duality proposed by aganagic et al . can have a corresponding type iia brane picture .
apart from conventional ones , where anti - branes are wrapped on a cy by hand , the setup here involves changing the orientation of local two - cycles through a varying background ns - flux . this dose work because @xmath10-field gives a khler moduli @xmath11 of arbitrary sign to shrinking two - cycles and hence controls their flops . on type iia side ,
we interpret this background as two crossing ns5-branes where @xmath12-branes appear naturally for flipped orientations .
consequently , simultaneous presence of d4- and @xmath12-branes soon suggests a way to realize various kinds of susy / non - susy vacua via adjusting parameters the ns - flux contains .
moreover , curved ns5-branes on @xmath13-plane with @xmath1 susy correspond to what has been known as the @xmath0 seiberg - witten theory .
one can further add fi parameters to partially break @xmath1 down to @xmath2 . resorting to type iia brane pictures
, we see this process is clearly visualized in figure [ partial susy ] .
the final @xmath2 vacuum is arrived at once the tree - level superpotential @xmath14 takes the form of @xmath15 .
we also considered m - theory lift . without @xmath16 perturbation ,
the m - theory curve itself is either a degenerated seiberg - witten curve on @xmath13-plane or a loop equation of dv matrix model on @xmath17-plane . though adding higher @xmath16 terms has no effect on the planar loop equation , we find that @xmath2 effective superpotential which involves @xmath18-cycles on @xmath13-plane gets modified
. in particular , it seems that the above partial susy breaking process can be described by deforming one given m - theory curve in order to incorporate quantum effects .
it is thus of interest to compare this observation with field theory results found in @xcite .
we leave these problems to future works .
we are grateful to k. hashimoto for helpful discussions .
ko would like to thank t. higaki and k. maruyoshi for useful comments .
ko is supported in part by grant - in - aid for scientific research ( no.19740120 ) from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology .
tst is supported in part by the postdoctoral program at riken .
l. hollands , j. marsano , k. papadodimas and m. shigemori , _ nonsupersymmetric flux vacua and perturbed n=2 systems , " _ arxiv:0804.4006 [ hep - th ] h. ooguri and y. ookouchi , _ `` meta - stable supersymmetry breaking vacua on intersecting branes , '' _ phys
. lett .
b * 641 * , 323 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0607183 ] a. giveon and d. kutasov , _ brane dynamics and gauge theory , " _ rev .
phys . * 71 * 983 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9802067 ] a. hanany and e. witten , _ type iib superstrings , bps monopoles , and three - dimensional gauge dynamics , " _ nucl .
b * 492 * 152 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9611230 ] r. dijkgraaf and c. vafa , nucl .
b * 644 * 3 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0206255 ] ; nucl .
b * 644 * 21 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0207106 ] ; [ arxiv : hep - th/0208048 ] f. cachazo , k. intriligator , and c. vafa , _
a large n duality via a geometric transition , " _ nucl .
b * 603 * 3 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0103067 ] i. antoniadis , h. partouche and t. r. taylor , phys .
b * 372 * , 83 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9512006 ] ; i. antoniadis and t. r. taylor , fortsch .
phys . *
44 * , 487 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9604062 ] s. ferrara , l. girardello and m. porrati , phys . lett .
b * 376 * , 275 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9512180 ] h. partouche and b. pioline , nucl .
* 56b * , 322 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9702115 ] k. fujiwara , h. itoyama and m. sakaguchi , prog .
phys . * 113 * , 429 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0409060 ] ; nucl .
b * 723 * , 33 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0503113 ] ; k. fujiwara , nucl . phys .
b * 770 * , 145 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0609039 ] | susy / non - susy duality aganagic et al type iia brane picture setup changing orientation local two - cycles background ns - flux @xmath10-field @xmath11 two - cycles controls flops background crossing ns5-branes @xmath12-branes flipped orientations simultaneous presence d4- @xmath12-branes suggests susy / non - susy vacua adjusting parameters ns - flux curved ns5-branes on @xmath13-plane with @xmath1 susy correspond @xmath0 seiberg - witten theory add fi parameters break @xmath1 to @xmath2 process visualized in figure partial susy final @xmath2 vacuum tree - level superpotential @xmath14 form @xmath15 considered m - theory lift without @xmath16 perturbation m - theory curve degenerated seiberg - witten curve @xmath13-plane or loop equation dv matrix model @xmath17-plane adding higher @xmath16 terms effect planar loop equation @xmath2 superpotential @xmath18-cycles on @xmath13-planepartial susy breaking process m - theory curve quantum effects compare with field theory results @xcite leave problems future works grateful to k. hashimoto discussions t. higaki k. maruyoshi comments supported by grant - scientific research.19740120 ministry education culture sports science technology supported postdoctoral program riken l. hollands j. marsano. papadodimas m. shigemori nonsupersymmetric flux vacua perturbed n=2 systems arxiv:0804.4006 h. ooguri y. ookouchi meta - stable supersymmetry breaking vacua intersecting branes phys . lett 641 323 2006 ) th/0607183 a. giveon d. kutasov brane dynamics gauge theory phys . 71 * 983 1999 )/9802067 a. hanany e. witten type iib superstrings bps monopoles three - gauge dynamics nucl . b * 492 * 152 ( 1997 )/9611230 r. dijkgraaf c. vafa nucl b * 644 * 3 2002 th/0206255 644 * 21 2002 th/0207106/0208048 f. cachazo k. intriligatorlarge duality geometric transition nucl b 603 3 2001 ) hep - th/0103067 antoniadis h partouche taylor phys 372 83 1996 ) hep - th/9512006 antoniadis taylor phys . 44 487 1996 ) hep - th/9604062 s. l. girardello m. porrati phys 376 275 1996 ) hep - th/9512180 h partouche b nucl 56b 322 1997 ) hep - th/9702115 k. fujiwara h. itoyama sakaguchi . 113 429 2005 ) hep - th/0409060 nucl b 723 33 2005 ) hep - th/0503113 fujiwara 770 145 2007 ) hep - th/0609039 | 0.183937 | 1,257 | 688 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.