sample_number int64 8 203k | abstract stringlengths 21 17.4k | article stringlengths 0 18.9k | compressed_article stringlengths 0 10.9k | compression_time float64 0 0.78 | original_tokens int64 0 3.79k | compressed_tokens int64 0 2.29k | token_saving stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
195,011 | in the present work we calculated spectroscopic factor strengths for recently measured experimental data for @xmath0 and @xmath1 pick - up reactions @xmath2al(d,@xmath3he)@xmath4 mg [ phys .
rev .
c * 93 * , 044601 ( 2016 ) ] and @xmath2al ( d,@xmath5)@xmath4al [ phys . rev .
c * 91 * , 054611 ( 2015 ) ] within the framework of the shell - model .
we performed calculations with usda and usdb effective interactions , results are in a good agreement with the experimental data . | the nature and occupancy of the single - particle orbits for a nucleus can be determine from the spectroscopic factors ( sf ) . experimentally the sf can be measured with single - particle transfer reactions .
these reactions are of two types , first one is stripping in which one nucleon is stripped from the incoming projectile , while the second one is pick - up reaction in which one nucleon is picked up by the projectile . the examples of neuton transfer pick - up recations are like @xmath6 , @xmath7 and ( @xmath3he,@xmath8 ) , while stripping reactions are like @xmath9 , @xmath10 and ( @xmath8 , @xmath3he ) @xcite .
the sf is defined by a matrix element between initial state and final state corresponding to entrance channel and exit channels , respectively .
it is possible to describe the capture or emission of single - nucleons in stellar burning processes by calculating the nuclear matrix elements for a single - nucleon spectroscopic factors in the nuclear structure calculations .
the study of sf in different region of nuclear chart are reported in refs .
survey of excited state neutron spectroscopic factors for @xmath11 nuclei are reported by tsang _
et al _ @xcite .
in this work they extracted 565 neutron spectroscopic factors for @xmath12 and @xmath13 shell nuclei by analyzing @xmath9 angular distributions , they compared the experimental results with shell - model . to study different excited states and their spectroscopic factors for @xmath4 mg , earlier many experimental results were reported in refs .
recently , the spectroscopic factors for @xmath4 mg is reported in ref .
@xcite using @xmath2al(d,@xmath3he)@xmath4 mg reaction .
the structure of @xmath2al using different reaction channels were reported in refs .
the experimental results for sf of 14 excited states for @xmath2al using @xmath2al(d,@xmath5)@xmath4al reaction is reported in ref .
the study of @xmath4al and @xmath4 mg are important for astrophysics point of view .
the massive stars throughout the galaxy dominate in the production of @xmath4al @xcite , and it decays by @xmath14 to @xmath4 mg . in the present work our aim is to study recently available experimental spectroscopic factors data for @xmath2al(d,@xmath3he)@xmath4 mg @xcite and @xmath2al(d,@xmath5)@xmath4al @xcite in the frame work of nuclear shell - model .
we performed the shell - model calculation for spectroscopic factor using the two most suitable effective interactions usda and usdb for sd shell nuclei using shell - model code nushellx @xcite .
the hamiltonians , usda and usdb are based on a renormalized @xmath15 matrix by fitting two - body matrix elements with experimental data for binding energies and excitation energies for the @xmath12 shell nuclei @xcite .
the usda and usdb interactions are fitted by varying 30 and 56 linear combinations of one- and two - body matrix elements , respectively .
the rms deviations of 170 kev ( usda ) and 130 kev ( usdb ) were obtained between experimental and theoretical energies . in the present work before calculating the sf , first we examine the wavefunctions of concerned nuclei .
the comparison between the calculated and experimental levels for @xmath4 mg and @xmath4al reported in figs . 1 - 2 . the results of usdb interaction is much better than usda interaction .
in the case of @xmath4al we calculated only the g.s.(@xmath16 ) . with the comparison of theoretical and experimental spectroscopic factors it is possible to check the predictive power of effective interaction used in the shell - model calculations .
we can define the spectroscopic factor in terms of the reduced matrix elements of @xmath17 by : @xmath18 where the @xmath19 factor is by convention associated with heavier mass @xmath20 . here , @xmath21 indices distinguish the various basis states with the same @xmath22 value .
( color online ) comparison between calculated and experimental @xcite data for @xmath4mg.,width=415,height=377 ] ( color online ) comparison between calculated and experimental [ nndc ] data for @xmath4al.,width=415,height=377 ] .extracted values of @xmath23 for different excited states of @xmath4 mg from the reaction @xmath2al(d,@xmath3he ) at 25 mev .
we have taken experimental data from ref .
here @xmath24 , @xmath25 are @xmath26 and @xmath27 orbitals , respectively . [ cols=">,>,>,>,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] [ table2 ] experimentally the states of @xmath4 mg @xcite were studied by assuming pick - up from @xmath27 orbital only , and also few states by assuming configuration mixing of two lower orbital of @xmath12 shell - @xmath27 and @xmath26 single particle orbitals . in the table
i , we compared the experimental @xmath23 values with shell - model results for usda and usdb effective interactions .
as in the experiment the @xmath23 values were very large for @xmath25 ( @xmath27 ) transfer as compared with @xmath24 ( @xmath26 ) transfer for the first three states .
the shell - model results are larger for first two states , thus assigning larger single particle charateristics to these states . in the present work we have also predicted @xmath23 values for states up to @xmath28 6 mev ,
although experimental data is not available . in the fig
3 we have also shown variation of @xmath23 for experiment and theory . in this
we have also plotted @xmath29 values for theory and experiment .
the states of @xmath4al @xcite were experimentally studied by assuming pick - up from @xmath27 and @xmath26 single particle orbitals , while @xmath30 state at 3507 kev by pick - up from @xmath31 orbital . in the table
ii , we compared experimental @xmath23 values with shell - model results for usda and usdb effective interactions .
the experimentally observed values for spectroscopic factors up to @xmath28 4.7 mev reported in ref .
@xcite . in the present work we interpreted these measured sfs in term of shell - model calculations .
the experimental @xmath23 values for @xmath27 states given in the table ii .
the sf results with shell - model is slightly higher than experimental value for @xmath32 state .
for some states the sfs are very small this is because in these cases the wavefunctions are very fragmented .
there are two states @xmath33 at 1759 kev and @xmath34 at 4705 kev , with very small calculated spectroscopic factors .
this is because large cancellations of contributions from different components of the wave functions . in the fig .
4 we plotted @xmath23 for experiment and theory . in this
we have also plotted @xmath29 values for theory and experiment . the theory and experiment showing same trends .
motivated with recent experimental results of spectroscopic factors for @xmath2al(d,@xmath3he)@xmath4 mg and @xmath2al(d,@xmath5)@xmath4al reactions . in the present work we performed shell - model calculations for spectroscopic factors with new hamiltonians for @xmath12 shell usda and usdb .
the predictions from shell - model are found to be in a good agreement with the experimental data .
the sfs provide an independent test for the usda and usdb interactions used in the present shell - model calculations .
the present spectroscopic factor results for @xmath4 mg and @xmath4al are important for nucleosynthesis .
brussaard and p.w.m .
glaudemans , shell - model applications in nuclear spectroscopy"- ( north - holland publishing company , 1977 ) .
m.h . macfarlane and j.b .
french , rev .
* 32 * , 567 ( 1960 ) .
schiffer @xmath35 , phys .
lett . * 100 * , 112501 ( 2008 ) .
schiffer @xmath35 , phys .
lett . * 108 * , 022501 ( 2012 ) .
brown and w.a .
richter , phys .
c * 74 * , 034315 ( 2006 ) .
tsang , j. lee , and w.g .
lynch , phys .
lett . * 95 * , 222501 ( 2005 ) .
morfouace @xmath35 , phys .
b * 751 * , 306 ( 2015 ) .
j. lee , m.b .
tsang , and w.g .
lynch , phys .
c * 75 * , 064320 ( 2007 ) .
tsang @xmath35 , phys .
* 102 * , 062501 ( 2009 ) .
j. vernotte @xmath35 , phys .
c * 48 * , 205 ( 1993 ) . b. h. wildenthal @xmath36 , phys . rev . * 175 * , 1431 ( 1968 ) .
g. j. wagner @xmath35 , nucl .
a * 125 * , 80(1969 ) .
m. arditi @xmath35 , nucl . phys .
a * 165 * , 129(1969 ) .
j. j. kraushaar @xmath35 , phys .
c * 34 * , 1530 ( 1986 ) .
m. yassue @xmath35 , phys .
c * 42 * , 1279 ( 1990 ) .
m. burlein @xmath35 , phys .
c * 29 * , 2013 ( 1984 ) . v. srivastava @xmath37 , phys .
c * 93 * , 044601 ( 2016 ) .
k. a. chipps @xmath35 , phys .
c * 86 * , 014329 ( 2012 ) .
n. takahashi @xmath35 , phys .
c * 23 * , 1305 ( 1981 ) .
j. kroon et @xmath35 , nucl .
a * 204 * , 609 ( 1973 ) .
d. l. show @xmath35 , nucl .
a * 263 * , 293 ( 1977 ) .
r. r. betts @xmath35 , phys .
c * 8 * , 670 ( 1972 ) .
j. nurzynski @xmath35 , nucl .
a * 107 * , 581 ( 1968 ) .
n. a. vlasov , s. p.
kalinin , a. a. ogloblin , and v. i. chuev , sov .
jetp * 37 * , 844 ( 1960 ) .
r. diehl @xmath35 , nature ( london ) * 439 * , 45 ( 2006 ) .
v. srivastava @xmath35 , phys .
c * 91 * , 054611 ( 2015 ) .
b. a. brown , w. d. m. rae , e. mcdonald , and m. horoi , nushellx@msu .
brown and w.a .
richter , phys .
c * 74 * , 0343151 ( 2006 ) .
brown and w.a .
richter , phys .
c * 80 * , 034301 ( 2009 ) . | nature occupancy single - particle orbits nucleus spectroscopic factors sf measured with single - particle transfer reactions reactions two types first stripping one nucleon stripped from projectile second pick - up nucleon picked up projectile transfer @xmath6 stripping reactions @xmath9 sf defined by matrix element between initial final state entrance exit channels describe capture emission single - nucleons in stellar burning calculating nuclear matrix elements single - nucleon spectroscopic factors nuclear structure calculations study sf nuclear chart reported refs survey excited state neutron spectroscopic factors for @xmath11 nuclei tsang _ et al _ @xcite extracted 565 neutron spectroscopic factors for @xmath12 @xmath13 shell nuclei compared results with shell - model excited states spectroscopic factors for @xmath4 mg results reported refs factors @xmath4 reported in ref @xcite @xmath2al reaction structure @xmath2al different reaction channels reported refs experimental results for sf 14 excited states for @xmath2al reaction reported in ref study @xmath4al mg important for astrophysics massive stars dominate production @xmath4al @xcite decays by @xmath14 to @xmath4 mg study experimental spectroscopic factors for @xmath2al mg @xcite nuclear shell - model calculation spectroscopic factor using interactions usda usdb for sd shell nuclei nushellx @xcite usda usdb based on renormalized @xmath15 matrix two - body matrix elements experimental data binding excitation @xmath12 shell nuclei usda usdb interactions fitted by 30 56 linear combinations one - body matrix elements rms deviations of 170 kev usda 130 kev ( usdb ) obtained between experimental theoretical energies wavefunctions of nuclei comparison calculated experimental levels for @xmath4 mg @xmath4al results usdb interaction better than usda @xmath4al calculated only g.s.(@xmath16 ) comparison check predictive power of effective interaction shell - model calculations spectroscopic factor reduced matrix elements @xmath17 by @xmath18 @xmath19 factor associated with heavier mass @xmath20@xmath21 indices distinguish basis states with @xmath22 value comparison calculated experimental @xcite data @xmath4mg @xmath4al values @xmath23 states @xmath4 mg from reaction @xmath2al(d@xmath3he at 25 mev taken experimental data from @xmath24 @xmath25 are @xmath26 @xmath27 orbitals states of @xmath4 mg @xcite studied assuming pick - up from @xmath27 orbital configuration mixing @xmath12 @xmath27 @xmath26 particle orbitals compared experimental @xmath23 values with shell - model results for usda usdb interactions @xmath23 values large for @xmath25 @xmath27 ) transfer @xmath24 transfer first three states shell - model results larger for first two states larger single particle charateristics predicted @xmath23 values for states up to @xmath28 6 mev experimental data not available fig 3 variation of @xmath23 for experiment theory plotted @xmath29 values for theory experimentstates @xmath4al @xcite studied pick - up from @xmath27 orbitals @xmath30 3507 kev from @xmath31 orbital table compared @xmath23 values shell - model results for usda usdb interactions observed values spectroscopic factors up to @xmath28 4.7 mev in @xcite interpreted sfs shell - model calculations @xmath23 values for @xmath27 states table ii results - model slightly higher than @xmath32 state some states sfs small wavefunctions fragmented two states @xmath33 at 1759 kev @xmath34 at 4705 kev small spectroscopic factors large cancellations contributions wave functions fig . 4 plotted @xmath23 theory @xmath29 values theory experiment same trends motivated recent results factors @xmath2al)@xmath4 mg@xmath4al reactions performed shell - model calculations for factors hamiltonians @xmath12 shell usda usdb predictions with experimental data sfs provide independent test for usda usdb interactions spectroscopic factor results for @xmath4 mg @xmath4al important for nucleosynthesisglaudemans shell model nuclear spectroscopy north - holland publishing company 1977 macfarlane french rev 32 567 1960 ) schiffer @xmath35 phys . 100 112501 2008 ) schiffer 108 022501 2012 ) brown richter 74 034315 2006 ) tsang lee lynch . 95 222501 2005 ) morfouace @xmath35 751 306 ( 2015 ) lee tsang lynch phys 75 * 064320 ( 2007 ) tsang @xmath35 102 062501 2009 ) vernotte @xmath35 48 205 ( 1993 ) wildenthal @xmath36 phys . 175 1431 ( 1968 ) wagner @xmath35 nucl 125 80(1969 ) arditi @xmath35 phys 165 129(1969 ) kraushaar @xmath35 phys 34 * 1530 ( 1986 ) yassue @xmath35 phys 42 1279 ( 1990 ) burlein @xmath35 phys 29 * 2013 ( 1984 )srivastava @xmath37 phys c 93 044601 ( 2016 ) chipps @xmath35 86 014329 ( 2012 ) takahashi @xmath35 phys c 23 1305 ( 1981 ) @xmath35 nucl 204 609 ( 1973 ) show @xmath35 nucl 263 293 ( 1977 ) betts @xmath35 c 8 ( 1972 ) nurzynski @xmath35 nucl 107 581 ( 1968 ) vlasov kalinin ogloblin chuev jetp 37 844 ( 1960 ) diehl @xmath35 nature london 439 45 ( 2006 ) srivastava @xmath35 phys c 91 054611 ( 2015 ) brown rae mcdonald horoi nushellx brown richter phys c 74 0343151 ( 2006 ) brown phys c 80 034301 ( 2009 ) | 0.35353 | 2,652 | 1,362 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,028 | dijet production in dis is an important laboratory for testing our understanding of perturbative qcd .
flexible nlo monte carlo programs allow to investigate general jet definition schemes . for forward jet production at @xmath0 and @xmath1 the nlo predictions fall well below hera data , thus providing evidence for bfkl dynamics .
multi - jet production in dis is an important topic of study at hera .
good event statistics allow for precise measurements and thus for a variety of tests of our understanding of qcd dynamics .
such tests include a ) the determination of @xmath2 from dijet production over a range of renormalization scales @xcite , b ) the measurement of the gluon density in the proton ( via @xmath3 ) @xcite , c ) forward jet production in the low-@xmath4 regime as a signal of bfkl dynamics @xcite , d ) the determination of @xmath2 and power corrections in dis event shapes @xcite . for quantitative studies
one clearly needs to compare data with calculations which include next - to - leading order ( nlo ) qcd corrections .
here we concentrate on issues related to dijet production at hera .
the present status of nlo monte carlo programs is reviewed .
second , we compare predictions in different jet definition and parton recombination schemes . finally , the @xmath5 predictions for forward jet production are discussed . | nlo qcd corrections to one and two - jet production cross sections and distributions , for @xmath6 exchange , are implemented in the fully differential @xmath7 jets event generators mepjet @xcite and disent @xcite . full neutral current exchange ( @xmath8 and/or @xmath9 ) is now available in mepjet 2.0 for tree level cross sections up to @xmath10 , _ i.e. _ up to 4-jet final states .
nlo corrections to two - jet production including @xmath9 and @xmath11 exchange will be available soon . both programs allow to study arbitrary experimental cuts and jet definition schemes .
previous calculations @xcite were limited to a jade type algorithm and important single jet - mass effects were neglected . because of the disagreement with these earlier calculations a comparison of the two new calculations is particularly important . in table
[ table_comp ] we compare results from mepjet and disent for 2- and 3-jet rates at hera ( @xmath12 gev , @xmath13 gev ) in the @xmath14-scheme with @xmath15 and a hard scattering scale @xmath16 .
parton distributions are used @xcite , we fix @xmath18 , and require @xmath19 gev@xmath20 . factorization and renormalization scales are set to @xmath21 .
no further cuts are imposed in the first column while in the second column reconstructed jets must have transverse momenta @xmath22 gev and pseudo - rapidities @xmath23 .
we find agreement at the 23% level , which is slightly larger than , but still compatible with the statistical errors determined by the monte carlo integration routines .
for all practical applications this agreement is satisfactory .
l|cc|cc & & & & + & & & & + + & 395.6 @xmath24 1.5 pb & 392.6 @xmath24 0.5 pb & 339.0 @xmath24 0.4 pb & 337.5 @xmath24 0.4 pb + & 33.0 @xmath24 0.5 pb & 32.5 @xmath24 0.2 pb & 27.7 @xmath24 0.2 pb & 27.2 @xmath24 0.2 pb + & 561 @xmath24 7 pb & 559 @xmath24 6 pb & 463 @xmath24 8 pb & +
the internal structure of jets is first modeled at nlo where two massless partons may be recombined to form a jet .
the dependence of jet cross sections on the details of the internal jet structure can be investigated by studying different recombination schemes : the @xmath25-scheme where parton 4-momenta are added to form massive jet 4-momenta , and the @xmath26 and @xmath27-schemes in which the jets are made massless by rescaling either the 3-momentum or the energy of the resulting cluster .
we use mepjet for numerical studies with mrs d- parton distribution functions @xcite .
the renormalization and factorization scales are set to one half the sum of parton transverse momenta in the breit frame .
a minimal set of kinematical cuts is imposed .
we require 40 gev@xmath28 gev@xmath20 , @xmath29 , an energy cut of @xmath30 gev on the scattered lepton , and pseudo - rapidities @xmath31 for the scattered lepton and jets .
also , jets must have transverse momenta of at least 2 gev in the lab and the breit frame . within these
general cuts four different jet definition schemes are considered .
i ) a cone algorithm with a jet separation cut of @xmath32 and a minimum jet transverse momentum of @xmath22 gev in the lab frame .
ii ) the @xmath14 algorithm ( in the breit frame ) as defined in ref . @xcite with a hard scattering scale @xmath33 gev@xmath20 and a resolution parameter @xmath15 for resolving the macro - jets .
in addition , jets are required to have a minimal transverse momentum of 5 gev in the breit frame .
iii ) the @xmath11-scheme where parton / cluster pairs ( including the proton remnant ) with invariant mass squared , @xmath34 are recombined @xcite .
iv ) the `` jade '' algorithm @xcite which is obtained from the @xmath11-scheme by replacing the invariant definition @xmath35 by @xmath36 . in the @xmath11 and jade schemes we set @xmath37 .
l|ccccc & & & & & + & & ( @xmath25 ) & ( @xmath25 ) & ( @xmath26 ) & ( @xmath27 ) + + & 1107 pb & 1047 pb & 1203 pb & 1232 pb & 1208 pb + @xmath14 & 1067 pb & 946 pb & 1038 pb & 1014 pb & 944
pb + @xmath11 & 1020 pb & 2061 pb & 2082 pb & 1438 pb & 1315 pb + & 1020 pb & 1473 pb & 1507 pb & 1387 pb & 1265 pb + the resulting cross sections ( see table [ table_dijet ] ) show large nlo corrections for the jade and @xmath11-schemes while @xmath38-factors close to unity are found for the @xmath14 and cone algorithms .
another disadvantage of the @xmath11 and jade schemes is their strong recombination scheme dependence . since even in a nlo calculation
the internal structure of a jet is only calculated at tree level , these strong variations point to large uncertainties from two - loop effects in the @xmath11 and jade schemes . in both schemes widely separated but relatively soft partons tend to be clustered to what is then defined as a jet , even though these clusters can be very massive and quite distinct from the pencil - like and low - mass objects which one starts out with in the parton model or at lo @xcite .
these differences then result in the large higher order corrections to jet cross sections shown in table [ table_dijet ] .
these effects are much smaller in the cone and the @xmath14 schemes which are hence favored for precision qcd studies in dis .
recently much interest has been focused on the small bjorken-@xmath4 region , where one would like to distinguish bfkl evolution @xcite , which resums the leading @xmath39 terms , from the more traditional dglap evolution equation @xcite , which resums leading @xmath40 terms .
bfkl evolution can be enhanced and dglap evolution suppressed by studying dis events which contain an identified jet of longitudinal momentum fraction @xmath41 ( in the proton direction ) which is large compared to bjorken @xmath4 @xcite .
when tagging a forward jet with @xmath0 this leaves little room for dglap evolution while the condition @xmath1 leaves bfkl evolution active .
this leads to an enhancement of the forward jet production cross section proportional to @xmath42 over the dglap expectation .
= 4.0 in = 3.0 in a conventional fixed order qcd calculation up to @xmath5 does not yet contain any bfkl resummation and must be considered a background for its detection ; one must search for an enhancement in the forward jet production cross section above the expectation for two- and three - parton final states .
the full calculation of the forward jet inclusive cross section in dis , at @xmath5 , has been performed in ref .
ordinarily , such a calculation would contain 3-parton final states at tree level , 1-loop corrections to 2-parton final states and 2-loop corrections to 1-parton final states .
however , these 2-loop contributions vanish identically , once the condition @xmath43 is imposed . the remaining 2-parton and 3-parton differential cross sections , and the cancellation of divergences between them , are the same as those entering a calculation of 2-jet inclusive rates .
these elements are already implemented in the mepjet program , which , therefore , can be used to determine the inclusive forward jet cross section at @xmath5 . in fig .
[ fig : h1comp ] numerical results are compared with recent data from h1 @xcite . here the conditions @xmath0 and @xmath1 are satisfied by selecting events with forward jets ( in the angular region @xmath44 ) with @xmath45 clearly h1 observes substantially more forward jet events than expected from nlo qcd . however , since h1 accepted jets of rather low transverse momentum , @xmath46 gev , the comparison of our parton level calculation to the data may be subject to sizable hadronization corrections .
a recent bfkl calculation @xcite ( dashed histogram ) agrees better with the data , but here the overall normalization is uncertain and the agreement may be fortuitous .
a very rough estimate of the uncertainty of the nlo calculation is provided by the two dotted lines which correspond to variations by a factor 10 of the renormalization and factorization scales @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
very similar results are found by zeus @xcite .
we conclude that the hera data show evidence for bfkl dynamics in forward jet events via an enhancement in the observed forward jet cross section above nlo expectations .
however , additional data , with harder forward jets , are needed to make the comparison of qcd calculations with data more reliable .
we thank m. seymour for his help comparing mepjet and disent .
this research was supported by the university of wisconsin research committee with funds granted by the wisconsin alumni research foundation and by the u. s. department of energy under grant no .
de - fg02 - 95er40896 .
the work of e. m. was supported in part by dfg contract ku 502/5 - 1 .
t. brodkorb and j.g .
krner , z. phys .
* c54 * ( 1992 ) 519 ; t. brodkorb and e. mirkes , z. phys .
* c66 * ( 1995 ) 141 ; d. graudenz , phys . lett . *
b256 * ( 1992 ) 518 ; phys . rev .
* d49 * ( 1994 ) 3291 .
martin , w.j .
stirling , r.g .
roberts , phys .
* b306 * ( 1993 ) 145 .
mueller , nucl .
b ( proc . suppl . )
* 18c * ( 1990 ) 125 ; j. phys . *
g17 * ( 1991 ) 1443 ; j. kwiecinski , a.d .
martin and p.j .
sutton , phys .
* d46 * ( 1992 ) 921 ; w.k .
tang , phys . lett .
* b278 * ( 1992 ) 363 ; j. bartels , a. de roeck and m. loewe , z. phys .
* c54 * ( 1992 ) 635 . | qcd corrections to two - jet production distributions @xmath6 implemented in differential @xmath7 jets generators mepjet disent neutral current exchange @xmath8 @xmath9 available in mepjet 2.0 tree level cross sections up to @xmath10 4-jet final states corrections to two - jet production @xmath9 @xmath11 exchange available soon programs arbitrary experimental cuts jet definition schemes previous calculations @xcite jade type algorithm single jet - mass effects neglected comparison new calculations important results mepjet disent 2- 3-jet rates @xmath12 @xmath14-scheme with @xmath15 hard scattering scale @xmath16 parton distributions used @xcite fix @xmath18 require @xmath19 factorization renormalization scales set to @xmath21 no further cuts first column second column reconstructed jets have transverse momenta @xmath22 pseudo - rapidities @xmath23 agreement at 23% level compatible with statistical errors monte carlo integration routines agreement satisfactory 1.5 0.5@xmath24 0.4 pb 337.5 + 33.0 32.5 0.2 pb 27.7 27.2 + 561 7 pb 559 6 pb 463 8 pb + internal structure jets modeled at nlo two massless partons form jet dependence jet cross sections on structure recombination schemes @xmath25-scheme parton 4-momenta @xmath26 @xmath27-schemes jets massless rescaling 3-momentum or energy cluster use mepjet for numerical studies d- parton distribution functions renormalization factorization scales half parton transverse momenta frame minimal kinematical cuts imposed require 40 gev@xmath28 gev@xmath20 @xmath29 energy cut @xmath30 gev pseudo - rapidities @xmath31 for scattered lepton jets jets transverse momenta 2 gev in lab breit frame four jet definition schemes cone algorithm jet separation cut @xmath32 minimum jet transverse momentum @xmath22 gev lab frame @xmath14 algorithm frame @xcite hard scattering scale @xmath33 gev@xmath20 resolution parameter @xmath15 for macro - jetsjets required minimal transverse momentum 5 gev breit frame @xmath11-scheme parton / cluster pairs proton remnant invariant mass @xmath34 recombined @xcite jade algorithm @xcite @xmath11-scheme invariant definition @xmath35 by @xmath36 @xmath11 jade schemes set @xmath37 @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 ) 1107 pb 1047 pb 1203 pb 1232 pb 1208 pb @xmath14 1067 pb 946 pb 1038 pb 1014 pb 944 pb @xmath11 1020 pb 2061 pb 2082 pb 1438 pb 1315 pb 1020 pb 1473 pb 1507 pb 1387 pb 1265 pb cross sections show large nlo corrections jade @xmath11-schemes @xmath38-factors close unity @xmath14 cone algorithms disadvantage @xmath11 jade schemes strong recombination scheme dependence internal structure jet tree level strong variations point uncertainties two - loop effects jade schemes widely separated soft partons clustered to jet clusters distinct from pencil - like low - mass objects parton model @xcitedifferences result in corrections to jet cross sections in table effects smaller in cone @xmath14 schemes favored for precision qcd studies interest focused on bjorken-@xmath4 region bfkl evolution @xcite @xmath39 from dglap evolution equation @xmath40 bfkl evolution enhanced dglap evolution suppressed by studying dis events longitudinal momentum fraction @xmath41 large compared to bjorken @xmath4 tagging forward jet with @xmath0 leaves room for dglap evolution condition @xmath1 leaves bfkl evolution active leads to enhancement forward jet production cross section proportional to @xmath42 over dglap expectation 3.0 conventional fixed order qcd calculation up to @xmath5 bfkl resummation background for detection search for enhancement forward jet production cross section above expectation full calculation of forward jet cross section at @xmath5 performed in ref 3-parton final states 1-loop corrections contributions vanish condition @xmath43 imposed remaining 3-parton differential cross sections cancellation of divergences same as 2-jet inclusive rateselements implemented in mepjet program determine forward jet cross section at @xmath5 fig . results compared with data from h1 @xcite conditions @xmath0 @xmath1 satisfied by selecting events forward jets @xmath45 h1 observes more forward jet events h1 accepted jets low transverse momentum may hadronization corrections recent bfkl calculation @xcite agrees better with data normalization uncertain agreement may fortuitous rough estimate of uncertainty nlo calculation by two dotted lines variations factor 10 of renormalization factorization scales @xmath47 and @xmath48 similar results by zeus @xcite hera data show evidence for bfkl dynamics in forward jet events enhancement forward jet cross section above expectations additional data harder forward jets needed comparison m. seymour for help comparing mepjet disent research supported by university of wisconsin research committee wisconsin alumni research foundation u. s. department of energy grant - - 95er40896 work e. m. supported by dfg contract ku 502/5 - 1 t. brodkorb krner ( 1992 ) 519phys . c66 1995 ) 141 graudenz phys b256 1992 ) 518 phys . rev d49 1994 ) 3291 stirling roberts phys b306 1993 ) 145 mueller nucl 18c 1990 ) 125 . g17 1991 ) 1443 kwiecinski martin sutton . d46 1992 ) 921 tang phys . lett b278 1992 ) 363 j bartels de roeck m loewe phys . c54 1992 ) 635 | 0.350197 | 2,489 | 1,286 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,032 | preliminary results are presented from a study of dijet photoproduction in ep collisions with both virtual and quasi - real photons at the zeus detector .
samples of events with photons of virtuality @xmath0 in the ranges @xmath1 gev@xmath2 and @xmath3 gev@xmath2 having two jets of @xmath4 gev in the final state have been obtained . for both quasi - real and virtual photons , uncorrected distributions of the quantity @xmath5 , the fraction of the photon momentum manifest in the two highest @xmath6 jets ,
are presented .
these distributions are sensitive to the relative contributions of the direct and resolved processes .
resolved photon processes are evident in both data sets , with an apparent decrease in the relative contribution from resolved processes as photon virtuality increases .
# 1#2#3 _ ann . phys .
( ny ) _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ astrophys .
j. _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ astrophys .
j. lett .
_ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ acta .
phys . pol .
_ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ ann .
rev .
nucl . part .
sci . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 . # 1#2#3 _ computer phys .
comm . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ erratum _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 . #
1#2#3 _ ibid . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ j. math .
phys .
_ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ int .
j. mod .
phys . _
* # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ jetp lett . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ j. phys
. g. _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ mod .
phys .
lett . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ nature ( london ) _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 . # 1#2#3 _ nuovo cim . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 . # 1#2#3 _ nucl .
instr .
meth .
_ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ nucl .
phys . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ proc .
cam .
phil .
soc .
_ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ phys .
lett . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ phys .
rep . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ phys .
rev . _
* # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ phys .
rev .
lett . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ proc .
roy .
soc . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ prog .
th .
phys .
_ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 . ps . #
1#2#3 _ physica scripta _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 . # 1#2#3 _ rev .
mod .
phys . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ rep .
prog .
phys . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ sov .
j. nucl .
phys . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ sov .
phys .
jept _
* # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ sov .
phys .-
usp . _
* # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
# 1#2#3 _ zeit .
phys . _ * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 .
glas
ppe/9503 talk given at the europhysics conference on high energy physics 27th july - 2nd august 1995 on behalf of the zeus collaboration | leading order ( lo ) qcd predicts photon interactions to have a two - component nature . in direct
photon processes the whole of the photon takes part in the hard subprocess with a parton from the proton whereas in resolved photon processes , the photon acts as a source of partons and one of these enters the hard subprocess ( see figure [ fig : diresfig ] ) .
both lo processes are characterized by having two outgoing partons of large transverse energy .
previous studies of dijet photoproduction at hera have shown that both classes of process are evident for the case of quasi - real photons ( those of negligible virtuality @xmath0 ) @xcite .
the parton content of photons is neither well constrained theoretically nor well known experimentally , particularly for photons with small but non - zero virtualities .
various theoretical predictions exist for the behaviour of the photon structure as a function of the photon virtuality @xcite .
the general expectation is that the contribution to the dijet cross section of resolved photon processes should decrease relative to the contribution from direct photon processes ( _ i.e. _ that the partonic content of the photon is suppressed ) as the virtuality of the photon increases .
the data used in this analysis were collected during the 1994 run when hera collided 27.5 gev positrons with 820 gev protons .
the zeus detector is described elsewhere@xcite .
a tungsten - silicon sampling calorimeter was installed for the 1994 running period .
this beampipe calorimeter tagged positrons scattered through small angles ( 17 - 35 mrad ) and gave a sample of events with photon virtualities in the range @xmath7 gev@xmath2 .
a sample of events with quasi - real photons ( @xmath3 gev@xmath2 with a median of @xmath8 gev@xmath2 ) was obtained by requiring that the scattered positron be detected in the downstream luminosity calorimeter@xcite .
jets were found in the main uranium - scintillator@xcite calorimeter using a cone algorithm @xcite in @xmath9 - @xmath10 space , where @xmath11 is azimuth and the pseudo rapidity @xmath12 , @xmath13 being defined with respect to the proton direction . only those events with two or more jets of transverse energy @xmath4 gev in the range @xmath14 were selected as dijet events . to reduce contamination from beam gas and deep inelastic scattering events , a cut of @xmath15 was applied , where the sum is over calorimeter cells with deposits of total and longitudinal energy @xmath16 and @xmath17 respectively and where @xmath18 is the positron beam energy . in photoproduction , @xmath19 is the fraction of the positron energy carried by the photon .
these cuts left a sample of 375 events with virtual photons and a sample of 14181 events with quasi - real photons , corresponding to respective integrated luminosities of 2.07 pb@xmath20 and 2.19 pb@xmath20 .
for each dijet event the fraction of the photon momentum manifest in the two highest @xmath6 jets , @xmath5 was calculated .
@xmath5 is defined by @xmath21 we measure @xmath22 and @xmath23 using the raw calorimeter energies and use the jaquet - blondel method , @xmath24 above , to measure @xmath19 .
no corrections are made for detector effects .
uncorrected distributions of @xmath5 are shown in figure [ fig : xgfig ] a ) for events with virtual photons and figure [ fig : xgfig ] b ) for events with quasi - real photons .
events at high @xmath5 are associated with direct photon processes while those at low @xmath5 are associated with resolved photon processes .
it is clear that both classes of event are present in both @xmath0 ranges . to quantify the relative contributions of these classes of event
, we have calculated the ratio @xmath25 , defined as the number of events at low @xmath5 ( @xmath26 ) divided by the number of events at high @xmath5 ( @xmath27 ) .
figure [ fig : resdirfig ] shows @xmath25 as a function of @xmath0 .
@xmath25 is independent of @xmath24 for the sample of events with quasi - real photons passing all the cuts applied .
this implies that the difference in the @xmath5 distributions for the two samples is not due to the differing @xmath24 acceptances of the two positron detectors .
the acceptance corrections that will eventually be applied to these data are only weakly dependent on @xmath5 and we therefore expect the corrections to @xmath25 to be small .
more work is required to understand fully these corrections however . in conclusion
we find the preliminary result that for events with photons of virtuality @xmath28 gev@xmath2 there is a contribution from resolved photon processes .
the size of this contribution relative to that from direct photon processes seems to decrease with increasing photon virtuality .
99 zeus collab .
, m.derrick et al .
, , m.drees and r.godbole , t. walsh , f. borzumati and g. schuler , zeus collab . , the zeus detector , status report ( 1993 ) m.derrick et al .
, a.andressen et al .
, a.bernstein et al .
, j.andruszkw et al . ,
desy 92 - 066 ( 1992 ) j.huth et al . , _
proc 1990 dpf summer study on h.e.phys_ , snowmass , ed e.l.berger , 1992 , p. 134 | qcd predicts photon interactions two - component direct photon processes photon hard subprocess parton from proton resolved photon processes photon source of partons one enters hard subprocess figure processes two outgoing partons large transverse energy studies dijet photoproduction hera shown both classes process evident quasi - real photons negligible virtuality parton content of photons constrained theoretically known experimentally small non - zero virtualities theoretical predictions exist for photon structure virtuality expectation contribution to dijet cross section of resolved photon processes decrease direct photon processes partonic content suppressed as virtuality increases data collected 1994 run hera collided 27.5 gev positrons with 820 gev protons zeus detector described tungsten - silicon sampling calorimeter installed 1994 running tagged positrons scattered small angles 17 - 35 mrad events with photon virtualities @xmath7 gev@xmath2 sample events with quasi - real photons median @xmath8 gev@xmath2 obtained scattered positron in downstream luminosity calorimeterjets found in uranium - scintillator@xcite calorimeter cone algorithm @xmath9 - @xmath10 space @xmath11 azimuth pseudo rapidity @xmath12 defined proton direction events two or jets transverse energy selected as dijet events reduce contamination scattering cut of @xmath15 applied sum over calorimeter cells total energy @xmath16 @xmath18 positron beam energy @xmath19 fraction positron energy photon cuts left 375 events virtual photons 14181 quasi - real photons luminosities 2.07 pb@xmath20 and 2.19 pb@xmath20 each dijet event fraction photon momentum two highest @xmath6 jets @xmath5 calculated defined by @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 raw calorimeter energies jaquet - blondel method measure @xmath19 no corrections for detector effects uncorrected distributions of @xmath5 shown in figure quasi - real photons high @xmath5 associated direct photon processes low @xmath5 resolved photon processes both classes event present in @xmath0 rangesrelative contributions classes event calculated ratio @xmath25 events low @xmath5 ) divided by high @xmath5 @xmath27 ) figure shows @xmath25 function of @xmath0 @xmath25 independent of @xmath24 for events quasi - real photons passing cuts difference in @xmath5 distributions not due to differing @xmath24 acceptances positron detectors acceptance corrections weakly dependent on @xmath5 expect corrections to @xmath25 small more work required understand corrections preliminary result events with photons virtuality @xmath28 gev@xmath2 contribution from resolved photon processes size contribution photon processes with increasing photon virtuality zeus collab . m.derrick et.drees.godbole walsh borzumati schuler zeus detector status report 1993.derrick.andressen.bernstein j.andruszkw desy 92 - 066 1992 j.huth et al 1990 dpf summer study h.e.phys_ snowmass ed e.l.berger 1992 p. 134 | 0.185296 | 1,238 | 639 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,034 | a clear gamma polarization in the @xmath0 signals from grb@xmath1 probes the presence of a very thin collimated jet ( opening angle @xmath2 ; @xmath3 ) in gamma ray burst , grbs . the last and well proved grb@xmath4/sn@xmath5dh time and
space coincidence confirms definitively the earliest grb@xmath6/sn@xmath7bw connection among grb and supernova .
the apparent extreme grbs luminosity is just the extreme beamed blazing gamma jet observed in axis during a supernova birth .
the maximal isotropic sn power , @xmath8@xmath9 erg @xmath10 , because of its probable energy equi - partition , should be collimated even into an even thinner jet @xmath11 , in order to explain at once the apparent observed maximal grbs output , @xmath12 @xmath8@xmath13 @xmath14 erg @xmath10 .
consequently one - shoot thin jet grbs needs many more @xmath15 @xmath16 event rate than any spread isotropic fireballs .
such a rate exceed even the known supernova one . to overcome the puzzle a persistent precessing decaying jet ( life - time @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 ) is compelling .
the late relic grbs sources may be found in compact snrs core , as ns or bh jets ; at much later epoch , their lower power @xmath0 jets may be within detectability only from nearby galactic distances , as soft gamma repeaters ( sgrs ) or anomalous x - ray pulsars , axps .
this common jet nature explain some connection between grbs and sgrs spectra .
the geometrical multi - precessing beaming and their reappearance to the observer may explain the puzzling presence of x - ray precursors in grbs as well as in sgrs . a mysterious re - brightening afterglows observed in early and late grb @xmath4 optical transient , like in the @xmath20 august @xmath7 and @xmath21 april @xmath22 sgr @xmath23 events , might be understood as the damped oscillatory imprint left by such a multi - precessing @xmath0-x - optical and radio jet .
# 1_#1 _ # 1_#1 _ = # 1 1.25 in .125 in .25 in | gamma ray burst mystery lays in its huge energy fluence , sharp variability , extreme cosmic distances and very different morphology .
a huge isotropic explosion disagree with the shortest millisecond time scales and non - thermal spectra .
the huge grbs powers as grb@xmath24 made the final collapse of the fireball model .
new families of fire - ball jet ( and their different label names like hyper - nova , supra - nova , collapsar ) models alleviated the energy budget , by a mild jet beaming . however in this compromise attitude the puzzle of the grb@xmath6/sn@xmath7bw ( which require a very thin jet observed off - axis ( fargion & salis 1995),(fargion1999 ) , has been cured by most skeptical authors by a tenacious cover - up ( neglecting or refuting the grb - sn existence ) or claiming the co - existence of an new zoo of grbs ( bloom 2000),(kulkarni ) .
these new compromised fountain - like fireball model has been collimated in a jet within a @xmath25 angle beam , as a soft link between past fireball and emerging jet
. however the apparent required grb power output is still huge ( @xmath26 erg @xmath10 ) , nearly @xmath27 more intense than other known maximal explosion power ( the super - nova one ) .
more and more evidences in last years and more recently have shown that super - nova might harbor a collimated jet gamma ray burst ( grb@xmath6/sn@xmath7bw , grb@xmath4/sn@xmath5dh ) . to combine the super - nova luminosity and the apparent huge grbs power one need a very much thinner beam jet , as small as a solid angle @xmath28 @xmath29 or @xmath30 respect to @xmath31,(corresponding to a jet angle @xmath32 ) .
there is a statistical need ( fargion 1999 ) to increase the grb rate inversely to the beam jet solid angle .
the needed sn rate ( to explain grbs ) may even exceed the observed one ( at least sn type ib andic ) event in our observable universe ( @xmath33 @xmath34 ) . indeed assuming that only a fraction of the sn ( with optimistic attitude @xmath35 of all known sn ) experience an asymmetric jet - sn explosion , than the corresponding observed rate @xmath36 @xmath37 and @xmath38 @xmath39 imply @xmath40 a result nearly @xmath41 order of magnitude larger than the observed sn rate . in this frame
one must assume a grb jet with a continuous active , decaying life - time much larger than grbs duration itself at least by a corresponding scale @xmath42 .
indeed we considered grbs ( as well as soft gamma repeaters sgr ) as very thin blazing ( @xmath43 ) precessing gamma jets spinning and precessing ( fargion & salis 1995,1996,fargion 1999 ) ; in this scenario grbs are born within a super - nova power collimated inside a very thin beam able to blaze us by an apparent grb intensities .
the inner angle geometrical dynamics while spinning and precessing induce the wide @xmath0 burst variability able to fit the very different observed grbs ones .
the averaged @xmath0 jet deflection from the axis of sight defines a main early power law decay ; an inner damped oscillatory substructure may be observed , as the amazing damping oscillatory afterglows in grb@xmath4 .
the very thin and collimated and long life decaying jet ( opening angle @xmath44 , whose decay power law life - time of a few hours occurs with an exponent @xmath45 ) , while spinning and precessing at different scale times , it may trace and may better explain the wobbling of the @xmath0 grbs and the long train of damped oscillations of the x tail afterglows within hours , the optical transient during days and weeks later .
the grbs re - brightening are no longer a mystery as in a one - shoot model .
these wobbling signatures may be also be found in rarest and most powerful and studied sgrs events .
the spread and wide conical shape of these precessing twin jets may be recognized in a few relic snrs as in the twin sn 1987a wide external rings , the vela arcs and the spectacular egg nebula dynamical shape .
we imagine the grb and sgr nature as the early and the late stages of jets fueled first by sn event and later by an asymmetric accretion disk or a companion ( wd , ns ) star .
the binary angular velocity @xmath46 bends the angle as @xmath47 or more generally a multi - precessing angle @xmath48:@xmath49 + @xmath50 + @xmath51 + where @xmath52 is the minimal impact angle parameter of the jet toward the observer , @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 are , in the order , the maximal opening precessing angles due to the binary , spinning pulsar , nutation mode of the multi - precessing jet axis .
the arbitrary phase @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 , for the binary , spinning pulsar and nutation , are able to fit the complicated grbs flux evolution in most grb event scenario .
naturally it is very possible to enlarge the parameter to a fourth precession angular component whose presence may better fit the wide spread of scale variability ; here we shall constrains to a three parameter precession beam . for a 3d pattern and its projection along the vertical axis in an orthogonal 2d plane see following descriptive pictures .
the different angular velocities are combined in the multi - precession wobbling .
each bending component is keeping memory either of the pulsar jet spin angular velocity ( @xmath59 ) and its opening angle @xmath54 , its nutation speed ( @xmath60 ) and nutation angle @xmath55 ( due to possible inertial momentum anisotropies or beam - accretion disk torques ) ; a slower precession by the binary @xmath46 companion ( and its corresponding open angle @xmath53 ) will modulate the overall jet precession . on average , from eq.(3 ) the @xmath0 flux and the @xmath61 , optical afterglow are decaying on time as @xmath62 , where @xmath63 ; however the more complicated spinning and precessing jet blazing is responsible for inner small scales wide morphology of grbs and sgrs as well as their partial internal periodicity . the consequent @xmath0 time evolution and spectra derived in this ideal models
may be compared successfully with observed grb data evolution .
the @xmath0 jet is born mainly by inverse compton scattering by gevs electron pairs onto thermal photons ( fargion 1995 - 96 - 98 - 99 ) in nearly vacuum space .
therefore these electron pairs are boosted in the jet at lorentz factor @xmath64 .
their consequent inverse compton scattering will induce a parallel @xmath0 jet whose beam angle is @xmath65 and a wider , less collimated x , optical cone .
these beaming angles agree with the one assumed to explain the required beamed grbs - sn powers . indeed
the electron pair jet may generate a secondary beamed synchrotron radiation component at radio energies , in analogy to the behaviour of bl lac blazars whose hardest tev @xmath0 component is made by inverse compton scattering while its correlated x band emission is due to the synchrotron component . anyway the inner jet is dominated by harder photons while the external cone contains softer @xmath61 , optical and radio waves . a jet angle related by a relativistic kinematics
would imply @xmath66 , where @xmath67 is found to reach @xmath68 ( fargion 1999 ) . at first approximation the gamma constrains is given by inverse compton relation : @xmath69 for @xmath70 and @xmath71 leading to characteristic x-@xmath0 grb spectra .
the origin of @xmath72 electron pairs are very probably decayed secondary related to primary inner muon pairs jets , able to cross dense stellar target ( fargion 2003 ) .
the same gevs electron pair jet may generate a secondary beamed synchrotron radiation component at radio energies , in analogy to the behaviour of bl lac blazars whose hardest tev @xmath0 component is made by inverse compton scattering while its correlated radio bumps is due to the synchrotron component . anyway the inner jet is dominated by harder photons while the external cone contains softer @xmath61 , optical and radio waves .
the very peculiar oscillating grb@xmath73 optical variability did show both a re - brightening and remarkable multi - bump variability in radio wave - lenght .
for this reason and we believe that this fluctuations were indeed to be related to the jet precession and not to any interstellar scintillation .
there is not any direct correlation between the @xmath0 jet made up by i.c .
scattering and the radio jet because the latter is dominated by the external magnetic field energy density : there maybe a different beaming opening and a consequent different time modulation respect to the inner @xmath0 jet .
however the present wide energy power emission between sn2002ap and grb@xmath4 radio light curves makes probable a beaming angle comparable : @xmath74 radiant .
these grbs jets are originated by nss or bh in binary system or disk powered by infall matter ; their relics ( or they progenitors ) are nearly steady x - ray pulsars whose fast blazing is source of sgrs .
this external @xmath0 jet has a chain of progenitor identities : it is very probably originated by a very collimated inner primary muon jet pairs at tevs - pevs energies .
these muons could cross with negligible absorption the dense target lights along the sn explosions , nearly transparent to photon - photon opacities . the high energy relativistic muons ( tens tevs - pevs energies ) decay in flight in electron pairs where the baryon density is still negligible
; these muons are source , by decay in flight to tevs - gev electron pair showering whose final inverse compton scattering with nearby thermal photon is the final primary of the observed hard @xmath61 - @xmath0 jet .
the cost of this long chain of reactions is a poor energy conversion , but the benefit is the possibility to explain the @xmath0 escape from a very dense explosive and polluted ( by matter and radiation ) narrow volume . its inner jet ruled by relativistic inverse compton scattering , has the hardest and rarest beamed gevs - mevs photons ( as the rare and long @xmath75 s life egret grb@xmath76 one ) but its external jet cones are dressed by softer and softer photons .
the complex variability of grbs and sgrs are simulated successfully by the equations above ( fargion & salis 1995,1996,1998 , fargion 1999 ) ; the consequent geometrical beamed jet blazing may lead also to the observed widest morphology @xmath77 signatures and rapid re - brightening as x - ray precursors .
the mystery therefore is not longer in an apparent huge grb luminosity , but in an extreme beam jet collimation and precession .
coburn w. , boggs s. e. nature 423 ( 2003 ) 415 - 417 blackman , e : g. , yi , i. , field g. b. : 1996 , _
apj_,*479 * , l79-l82 j.s.bloom et all .
fargion , d. , salis , a.:1995a,_nuclear phys b ( proc.suppl.)_,*43*,269-273 .
fargion , d. , salis , a.:1995b,_astrophysics & space science_,*231*,191 - 194 .
fargion , d.,et all .
: 1996a , _
3rd huntsville grbaip.conf._ : * 384*,749 - 753 .
fargion , d. , salis , a. : 1998,physics - uspekhi,*41(8)*,823 - 829 .
fargion , d.1999c,_aa & ss_,*138*,507 ; see astro - ph/9903433 ; p. hoeflich , j.c .
wheeler , l. wang . : 1999,apj.521,179 .
kulkarni , s. r. , et al .
, 1998,_nature_,*393*,35 . | gamma ray burst mystery energy fluence variability extreme cosmic distances different morphology isotropic explosion millisecond time scales non - thermal spectra huge grbs powers grb@xmath24 collapse fireball model new fire - ball jet hyper - nova supra - nova alleviated energy budget mild jet beaming compromise puzzle of grb@xmath6/sn@xmath7bw thin jet cured by skeptical authors cover - up grb - sn existence claiming co - existence new zoo of grbs compromised fountain - like fireball model collimated in jet within @xmath25 angle beam fireball grb power output huge @xmath26 @xmath10 @xmath27 more intense than maximal explosion power super - nova one evidences super - nova might harbor collimated jet gamma ray burst@xmath6@xmath7bw@xmath4/sn@xmath5dh super - nova luminosity huge grbs power thinner beam jet solid angle @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 jet angle @xmath32 statistical need to increase grb rate inversely to beam jet solid angleneeded sn rate explain grbs may exceed observed event in universe @xmath33 assuming fraction of sn experience asymmetric jet - sn explosion observed rate @xmath36 imply result nearly larger than observed sn rate assume grb jet with continuous active decaying life - time larger than grbs duration @xmath42 considered grbs soft gamma repeaters as thin blazing ) precessing gamma jets spinning precessing 1995 1999 grbs born within super - nova power collimated inside thin beam grb intensities inner angle geometrical dynamics spinning precessing induce wide @xmath0 burst variability fit different observed grbs averaged jet deflection from axis sight defines early power law decay inner damped oscillatory substructure observed afterglows in grb@xmath4 thin collimated long life decaying jet decay power law life - time few hours occurs exponent @xmath45 ) spinning precessing different scale times may explain wobbling of grbs long damped oscillations x tail afterglows within hours optical transient days weeksgrbs re - brightening mystery one - shoot model wobbling signatures found rarest sgrs events conical shape precessing twin jets recognized relic snrs twin sn 1987a rings vela arcs egg nebula dynamical shape imagine grb sgr nature early late stages jets fueled sn event asymmetric accretion disk companion star binary angular velocity @xmath46 bends angle @xmath47 multi - precessing angle @xmath48@xmath49 @xmath52 minimal impact angle jet observer @xmath53 @xmath55 maximal opening precessing angles binary spinning pulsar nutation mode multi - precessing jet axis arbitrary phase @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 binary spinning pulsar nutation fit complicated grbs flux evolution grb event scenario possible enlarge parameter fourth precession angular component scale variability three parameter precession beam 3d pattern projection vertical 2d plane descriptive pictures different angular velocities combined multi - precession wobbling bending component pulsar jet spin velocity opening angle nutation speed angle due to inertial momentum anisotropies beam - accretion disk torques slower precession binary @xmath46 companion open angle @xmath53 jet precession @xmath0 flux @xmath61 optical afterglow decaying on time complicated spinning precessing jet blazing for morphology of grbs sgrs partial internal periodicity @xmath0 time evolution spectra models compared with grb data evolution @xmath0 jet born by inverse compton scattering gevs electron pairs thermal photons vacuum space electron pairs boosted jet at lorentz factor @xmath64 inverse compton scattering parallel @xmath0 jet beam angle @xmath65 wider less collimated optical cone beaming angles agree beamed grbs - sn powers electron pair jet generate secondary beamed synchrotron radiation at radio energies blazars hardest component inverse compton scattering x band emission synchrotron component inner jet dominated by harder photons external cone contains softer @xmath61 optical radio wavesjet angle relativistic kinematics @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 fargion 1999 gamma constrains inverse compton relation @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 x-@xmath0 grb spectra origin @xmath72 electron pairs decayed secondary muon pairs jets cross stellar target 2003 gevs electron pair jet secondary synchrotron radiation radio energies blazars hardest @xmath0 component inverse compton scattering radio bumps synchrotron component inner jet dominated harder photons external cone softer @xmath61 optical radio waves oscillating grb@xmath73 optical variability re - brightening multi - bump variability radio wave - lenght fluctuations related jet precession not interstellar scintillation direct correlation @xmath0 jet scattering radio jet dominated external magnetic field energy density different beaming opening time modulation inner @xmath0 jet wide energy power emission between sn2002ap grb@xmath4 radio light curves beaming angle comparable @xmath74 radiant jets originated nss bh powered infall matter steady x - ray pulsars fast blazing source sgrsexternal @xmath0 jet progenitor identities originated by collimated inner muon jet pairs at tevs - pevs energies muons cross dense target lights transparent to photon - opacities high energy muons decay in flight electron pairs baryon density negligible to tevs - gev electron pair final inverse compton scattering thermal photon primary @xmath61 - @xmath0 jet cost poor energy conversion benefit @xmath0 escape from dense explosive polluted narrow volume inner jet ruled by relativistic inverse compton scattering has hardest rarest beamed gevs - mevs photons external jet cones softer photons complex variability of grbs sgrs simulated by equations ( fargion & salis 1995,1996 1999 geometrical beamed jet blazing to widest morphology @xmath77 signatures rapid re - brightening x - ray precursors mystery not in grb luminosity but extreme beam jet collimation precession coburn w. boggs s. nature 423 ( 2003 ) 415 - 417 blackman field g 1996-l82bloom fargion d salis phys*43*,269-273_astrophysics space science*231*,191 - 194 fargion 1996a 3rd huntsville grbaip.conf.*,749 - 753 fargion salis 1998,physics - uspekhi*41(8)*,823 - 829 fargion.1999c_aa ss*138*,507 astro - ph/9903433 p. hoeflich j.c wheeler l. wang 1999,apj.521,179 kulkarni s r 1998*393*,35 | 0.431749 | 2,753 | 1,422 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,037 | results are presented for the leading power - suppressed ( @xmath0 ) contributions to shape variables in deep inelastic lepton scattering .
these are then combined with available leading order perturbative estimates .
cavendish - hep-97/07 + hep - ph/9706263 | the increasing quantity of data from hera has given a great boost to the testing of qcd via determinations of the strong coupling constant and the possibility of observing , over a wide kinematic range , its running behaviour .
+ however in any comparison between theory and experimental data proper account has to be taken of the non - perturbative behaviour inherent in any observable qcd process . while event shape variables are considered useful observables for @xmath1 determinations they can suffer from significant power suppressed effects which are non - perturbative in origin .
these @xmath0 corrections have already been calculated for a number of @xmath2 event shapes [ 1 ] and similar results are obtained here for dis . to make the analogy with @xmath2 shape variables clearer
it proves useful to work in the breit frame and to define current jet event shapes as done in the next section . the dispersive approach [ 2 ]
is used to estimate the power corrections , which is equivalent to a calculation of the leading renormalon ambiguity .
one can define several infrared safe quantities that characterize the shape of the event in the current hemisphere @xmath3 of the breit frame .
perturbative results are available in [ 3 ] .
the event shapes considered below are the thrust , the jet mass , the jet broadening and the @xmath4 parameter with the following definitions in the above order where @xmath5 denotes a unit 3-vector along the current direction and the summation index @xmath6 runs over only those partons that are in the current hemisphere .
@xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 where the @xmath11 denote the eigenvalues of the symmetric matrix @xmath12 defined as @xmath13 the subscript @xmath14 indicates the normalization factor @xmath15 .
one can also use a normalization factor given by the sum of energies of partons in the breit frame , but the normalization does not affect the power corrections we compute .
our estimate of the leading power corrections to the perturbative results are based on the approach of ref.[2 ] .
non - perturbative effects at long distances are assumed to give rise to a modification @xmath16 in the qcd effective coupling at low values of the scale @xmath17 .
the effect on some observable @xmath18 is then given by a characteristic function @xmath19 as follows : @xmath20 where @xmath21 the characteristic function is obtained by computing the relevant one - loop graphs with a non - zero gluon mass @xmath22 [ 4 ] . + arbitrary finite modifications of the effective coupling at low scales would generally introduce power corrections of the form @xmath23 into the ultraviolet behaviour of the running coupling itself . as discussed in ref.[2 ] , such a modification would destroy the basis of the operator product expansion [ 5 ] .
this leads to the constraint that only terms in the small-@xmath24 behaviour of the characteristic function that are non - analytic at @xmath25 will lead to power behaved non - perturbative contributions [ 2 ] .
we find that in dis as for @xmath26 the leading non - analytic behaviour takes the form of @xmath27 with an extra @xmath28 in the jet broadening .
the details of the calculation can be found in [ 3 ] .
the results for the power corrections are presented below .
@xmath29 is an phenomenological parameter first suggested in ref.[2 ] which is expected to be approximately universal .
@xmath30 data are consistent with a value for @xmath31 of about @xmath32 gev . in the case of the current jet thrust
we get a non - perturbative contribution @xmath33 for the current jet mass one gets a correction given by @xmath34 for the @xmath4 parameter we get @xmath35 in the case of the jet broadening a slightly different behaviour is obtained @xmath36 where @xmath37 is an undetermined scale .
the plots for the combined leading order prediction and power correction are presented for all of these event shape variables in figures 1 - 2 .
the mrs@xmath38 [ 8 ] parton distribution was used in every case .
it should be pointed out that as explained in ref.[3 ] the predictions for the numerical coefficients of @xmath39 for the @xmath4 parameter and the jet broadening are somewhat uncertain .
this is due to an inherent limitation of the massive gluon technique with regard to event shapes .
the use of a gluon mass in perturbative calculations is equivalent to summing inclusively over all bubbles in the renormalon chain . in the case of less inclusive variables like
event shapes the phase space is dependent on the bubble structure which is ignored by the massive gluon formulation .
this has been shown for event shapes in [ 6 ] and for gluon fragmentation functions in ref.[7 ] .
it is believed that this limitation does not affect the form of the power corrections to any of the shape variables and in fact appears not to make any significant difference to the predictions for the thrust and the jet mass where our results are not sensitive to the inclusion of a gluon mass in the definition of the shape variable .
the power corrections here arise from using a massive gluon phase space alone . in the case of the @xmath4 parameter and the jet
broadening the predictions for the numerical coefficients depend on whether or not a gluon mass is included throughout .
a glance at the relevant figures also reveals that there are enormously large power corrections in the case of @xmath40 and @xmath41 even at @xmath42 gev .
this fact coupled with the uncertainty about the coefficient would mean that these variables are unsuitable for an extraction of the strong coupling . on the other hand the predictions for power corrections to the thrust and the jet mass are more reliable making these , in our opinion , good observables for determination of @xmath43 .
the relevant experimental results have been presented at this workshop by the h1 collaboration [ 9,10 ]
all of the work presented here was done in collaboration with b.r.webber .
i am also grateful to trinity college , cambridge and the committee of vice - chancellors and principals of the universities of the united kingdom for financial support .
p.nason and m.h .
seymour , _ nucl .
b 454_(1995 ) 291 .
m.beneke , v.m .
braun and l.magnea , _ hep - ph/9701309_. a.d.martin , r.g roberts and w.j stirling , _
( 1994)6734 .
k.rabbertz , these proceedings .
h1 collaboration , c.adloff et al .
, _ preprint desy 97 - 098 _ , submitted to _ | increasing data from hera testing qcd via strong coupling constant observing running behaviour comparison between theory experimental data non - perturbative behaviour in qcd process event shape variables useful for @xmath1 determinations suffer significant power suppressed effects non - perturbative @xmath0 corrections calculated for @xmath2 event shapes similar results for dis analogy @xmath2 to work in breit frame define current jet event shapes dispersive approach 2 to estimate power corrections equivalent to leading renormalon ambiguity define infrared safe quantities characterize shape event in current hemisphere of breit frame perturbative results available in [ 3 ] event shapes are thrust jet mass jet broadening @xmath4 parameter with definitions @xmath5 unit 3-vector current direction summation index @xmath6 runs over partons in current hemisphere eigenvalues of symmetric matrix subscript @xmath14 indicates normalization factor @xmath15 normalization factor given by sum of energies of partons in breit frame affect power corrections estimate of leading power corrections to perturbative results based on approach of ref.[2 ]non - perturbative effects at long distances modification @xmath16 in qcd effective coupling at low values scale effect on observable @xmath18 by characteristic function @xmath19 @xmath21 function obtained by computing one - loop graphs with non - zero gluon mass @xmath22 arbitrary modifications coupling at low scales introduce power corrections @xmath23 into ultraviolet behaviour running coupling modification operator product expansion terms in small-@xmath24 behaviour non - analytic at @xmath25 lead to power non - perturbative contributions @xmath26 leading non - analytic behaviour @xmath27 extra @xmath28 in jet broadening details calculation in results for power corrections presented below @xmath29 phenomenological parameter expected universal @xmath30 data consistent with value @xmath31 @xmath32 current jet thrust non - perturbative contribution @xmath33 current jet mass correction by @xmath34 jet broadening different behaviour @xmath36 @xmath37 undetermined scale plots for combined leading order prediction power correction presented for variables in figures 1 - 2 mrs@xmath38 parton distribution used everypointed explained in ref.[3 ] predictions for numerical coefficients of @xmath39 @xmath4 parameter jet broadening uncertain due to limitation massive gluon technique event shapes use gluon mass in calculations equivalent to summing over all bubbles in renormalon chain less inclusive variables phase space on bubble structure ignored by massive gluon formulation shown for event shapes in [ 6 ] gluon fragmentation functions in ref.[7 ] limitation affect power corrections to shape variables significant difference to predictions for thrust jet mass gluon power corrections arise from using massive gluon phase space @xmath4 parameter jet broadening predictions coefficients depend on gluon mass large power corrections in @xmath40 @xmath41 at @xmath42 gev uncertainty coefficient variables unsuitable for extraction strong coupling predictions for power corrections to thrust jet mass more reliable good observables for determination of @xmath43 relevant experimental results presented by h1 collaboration [ 9,10 ] work done collaboration with b.r.webber grateful to trinity college cambridge committee of vice - chancellors principals of universities united kingdom for financial supportseymour nucl 454(1995 ) 291 m.beneke braun.magnea hep - ph/9701309.d.martin roberts stirling 1994)6734.rabbertz proceedings collaboration c.adloff al preprint desy 97 - 098 submitted | 0.262755 | 1,448 | 733 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,045 | low surface brightness ( lsb ) galaxies are dominated by dark matter halo from the innermost radii ; hence they are ideal candidates to investigate the influence of dark matter on different dynamical aspects of spiral galaxies . here
, we study the effect of dark matter halo on grand - design , @xmath0 , spiral modes in a galactic disk , treated as a collisionless system , by carrying out a global modal analysis within the wkb approximation .
first , we study a superthin , lsb galaxy ugc 7321 and show that it does not support discrete global spiral modes when modeled as a disk - alone system or as a disk plus dark matter system .
even a moderate increase in the stellar central surface density does not yield any global spiral modes .
this naturally explains the observed lack of strong large - scale spiral structure in lsbs .
an earlier work @xcite where the galactic disk was treated as a fluid system for simplicity had shown that the dominant halo could not arrest global modes .
we found that this difference arises due to the different dispersion relation used in the two cases and which plays a crucial role in the search for global spiral modes .
thus the correct treatment of stars as a collisionless system as done here results in the suppression of global spiral modes , in agreement with the observations .
we performed a similar modal analysis for the galaxy , and found that the dark matter halo has a negligible effect on large - scale spiral structure .
galaxies : kinematics and dynamics , galaxies : spiral , galaxies : structure , galaxies : individual : ugc 7321 , galaxies : halos , instabilities | low surface brightness ( lsb ) galaxies are characterized by low star formation rate @xcite and low disk surface density @xcite .
the spiral structure in lsbs is often incipient or fragmentary and usually faint and difficult to trace @xcite , and they generally do not host any strong large - scale spiral structure , the kind we see in case of normal hsb galaxies like our milky way .
we note that , we are interested only in small lsbs , which are more abundant , and do not include the giant lsbs like malin 1 . some of the giant lsbs show fairly strong , large - scale spiral structure as in ugc 6614 @xcite and in the inner regions they are dynamically similar to their high surface brightness ( hsb ) counterparts @xcite .
@xcite has applied the technique of density - wave theory to put constraint on the decomposition of the rotation curve in lsbs .
however we note that in the sample considered by @xcite contains giant lsb ( e.g. , ugc 6614 ) which often show large - scale spiral structure ( e.g. , see * ? ? ?
the lsbs are dark matter dominated from the very inner regions @xcite . within the optical disk ,
the dark matter constitutes about @xmath1 per cent of the total mass of lsbs , whereas for the hsbs the contributions of the dark matter halo mass and stellar mass are comparable @xcite .
thus , the lsbs constitute a natural laboratory to study the effect of dark matter halo on different aspects of galactic dynamics .
several past studies have shown the effect of dominant dark matter halo in the suppression of global non - axisymmetric bar modes @xcite , in making the galactic disks superthin @xcite and in prohibiting the swing amplification mechanism from operating , thus explaining the lack of small - scale spiral structure as noted observationally @xcite . according to the density wave theory ,
the grand - design spiral arms are the high density regions of a rigidly rotating spiral density wave , with a well defined pattern speed , that are self - consistently generated by the combined gravity of the unperturbed disk and the density wave @xcite .
for a recent review on this see @xcite . in a recent work @xcite ( hereafter paper
1 ) investigated the role of a dominant dark matter halo on the global spiral modes within the framework of the density wave theory by treating the galactic disk as a fluid . using the input parameters of a superthin lsb galaxy ugc 7321 and the galaxy , they found that for ugc 7321 , the dark matter halo has a negligible effect on arresting the global spiral modes when the disk is modeled as a fluid .
this is in contrast to the results for small - scale spiral features where the dark matter was shown to suppress the small - scale , swing - amplified spiral structures almost completely @xcite .
ghosh et al .
( paper 1 ) argued that that since lsbs are relatively isolated , tidal interactions are less likely to occur compared to those for the high surface brightness ( hsb ) galaxies .
thus even though the global spiral modes are formally permitted in the fluid disk plus dark matter halo model , it was argued that it is the lack of tidal interaction that makes it difficult for the global spiral structure to develop in these galaxies . in this paper
we address the effect of dark matter halo on global @xmath0 modes by modeling the galactic disk more realistically as a @xmath2 system .
a tidal encounter is likely to give rise to global modes , as has been seen in simulations , as in m51 ( see e.g. , * ? ? ?
we use the dispersion relation for a @xmath2 disk to construct global standing - wave like solutions by invoking the bohr - sommerfeld quantization condition ( for details see paper 1 ) .
note that fluid disks allow wavelike solutions at small wavelengths , since fluid pressure provides the restoring force ; but collisionless disks suppress wavelike modes for very small wavelengths ( e.g. see * ? ? ?
the 2 contains formulation of the problem and the input parameters . in 3 we present the wkb analysis and the relevant quantization rule . 4 * 5 * contain the results and discussion , respectively while 6 contains the conclusions .
we model the galactic disk as a collisionless system characterized by an exponential surface density @xmath3 , and one - dimensional velocity dispersion @xmath4 . for simplicity ,
the galactic disk is taken to be infinitesimally thin .
in other words , we are interested in perturbations that are confined to the mid - plane ( @xmath5 ) . the dark matter halo is assumed to be non - responsive to the gravitational perturbations of the disk .
we have used cylindrical coordinates @xmath6 in our analysis . in this subsection
, we describe the models that we have used for the study of effect of dark matter halo on the global spiral modes .
the dynamics of the disk is calculated first only under the gravity of the disk ( referred to as disk - alone case ) and then under the joint gravity of disk and the dark matter halo ( referred to as disk plus halo case ) .
we took an exponential stellar disk with central surface density @xmath7 and the disk scalelength @xmath8 , which is embedded in a concentric dark matter halo whose density follows a pseudo - isothermal profile characterized by core density @xmath9 and core radius @xmath10 . the net angular frequency , @xmath11 and the net epicyclic frequency , @xmath12 for a galactic disk embedded in a dark matter halo , concentric to the galactic disk , are given as : + @xmath13 the expressions for @xmath14 , @xmath15 in the mid - plane ( @xmath5 ) for an exponential disk and @xmath16 , @xmath17 for a pseudo - isothermal halo in the mid - plane ( @xmath5 ) have been calculated earlier ( see paper 1 for details ) . in the early - type galaxies ,
the bulge component dominates in the inner regions , and hence exclusion of the bulge component from the models for early - type galaxies will underestimate the rotation curve in the inner regions . in paper 1 , it was shown that for the galaxy , inclusion of bulge yielded more realistic results ( for details see 5.1 in paper 1 ) .
also note that ugc 7321 has no discernible bulge @xcite .
therefore , only for our galaxy we have included bulge in both the disk - alone and disk plus dark matter halo models .
we adopt a plummer - kuzmin bulge model for our galaxy which is characterized by total bulge mass @xmath18 and bulge scalelength @xmath19 .
the expressions for @xmath20 , @xmath21 in the mid - plane ( @xmath5 ) for such a bulge having a plummer - kuzmin profile are given in paper 1 .
therefore , for the galaxy , these @xmath20 and @xmath21 terms will be added in quadrature to the corresponding terms due to disk and dark matter halo .
the input parameters for different components of ugc 7321 @xcite and the galaxy @xcite are summarized in table 1 . [
cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] shows that the modes do not extend up to the resonance points , consistent with the fact that @xmath22 is not equal to zero anywhere for modes in fig .
[ fig3].,title="fig:",width=326,height=230 ] shows that the modes do not extend up to the resonance points , consistent with the fact that @xmath22 is not equal to zero anywhere for modes in fig .
[ fig3].,title="fig:",width=336,height=230 ] from table 2 , it is evident that the dark matter halo has a negligible effect on the global spiral modes for the galaxy , the difference can be seen only in the change of the specific values of pattern speed @xmath23 .
this result is at par with our expectation , since the dark matter halo is known to be not important in the inner regions of the galaxy ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) . these results are consistent with the results of paper 1 where the galactic disk was modeled as a fluid disk .
the key difference with results from paper 1 is that the specific values of pattern speed @xmath23 which give the global modes are different ( for comparison , see table 3 in paper 1 ) .
@xcite found a range of @xmath24 km s@xmath25 kpc@xmath25 for the pattern speed of spiral arms for the galaxy . on comparison
the pattern speed values obtained in this paper lie outside the observed range of pattern speed .
the shape of the closed contours in this work ( figs .
1 - 3 ) is different from that in paper 1 .
a curve of constant @xmath23 had nearly identical @xmath22 values at the turning points of a closed curve of _ type b _ in paper 1 , whereas the contours look slanted in the present paper , meaning that the @xmath22 values at the turning points are substantially different .
this is due to the difference in the dispersion relation for the two cases .
a more detailed interpretation is not possible in a simple analytical form , since the dispersion relation for the collisionless case ( equation ( [ disp - equation ] ) ) has a transcendental form . in this paper for simplicity
we have not included the low velocity dispersion component , namely , gas in the system which could further modify the obtained range of pattern speeds .
note that any late - type spiral galaxy contains non - negligible amount of gas , and it has been shown that the gas plays a significant role in various dynamical issues ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
the amount of gas present in ugc 7321 is quite small in comparison to that in hsb galaxies @xcite .
therefore , the results for ugc 7321 obtained in this paper - in particular the suppression of global modes by the dominant dark matter halo is unlikely to change significantly if gas is included in the calculation .
the effect of gas on the global spiral modes in a gravitationally coupled two - component ( stars and gas ) system , as applicable to the gas - rich hsb galaxies , will be taken up in a future paper .
the results presented here are based on the assumption that the grand - design spiral structure seen in disk galaxies is due to the density waves , as proposed by @xcite .
however this hypothesis has not yet been fully confirmed observationally .
for example , the angular off - set in age of the stellar population , as predicted by the classical density wave theory has not been found in studies by @xcite in their sample of late - type disk galaxies .
also the study of @xmath26 observation of ngc 1068 using generalized tremaine - weinberg method by @xcite has revealed that the pattern speed of the spiral structure of this galaxy varies rapidly with radius , indicative of short - lived spiral features .
a study of the gas content and the @xmath27 line of sight velocity distribution in ngc 6754 by @xcite revealed a different sense of streaming motion in the trailing and leading edge of this galaxy , indicating that the spiral arms of this galaxy is likely to be a transient . on the other hand , it is also worth noting that @xcite have recently presented a study of measuring pitch angle from the images taken in different wavelengths for a large sample of disk galaxies and found that the pitch angle varies from one wavelength to another as predicted by the classical density wave theory , and thus furnishes strong observational evidence for the validity of the density - wave theory of spiral structure in disk galaxies
. generally the various @xmath28-body studies so far do not show the evidence of long - lived spiral structure .
several @xmath28-body simulations have shown that the spiral arms are transient and get wound up quickly @xcite , which goes against the classical density wave picture .
interestingly an opposite trend is shown in a recent work by @xcite who reported long - lived spiral structure in a @xmath28-body study of models for galaxies with intermediate bulges .
we have investigated the effect of a dominant dark matter halo on the possible existence of global spiral arms while modeling the galactic disk as a _ collisionless _ system .
the wkb dispersion relation and the bohr - sommerfeld quantization condition were used to obtain discrete global spiral modes present in any model .
we have analysed a superthin lsb galaxy ugc 7321 , and the galaxy , for this work .
we found that for ugc 7321 both the disk - alone and the disk plus dark matter halo cases did not yield any discrete global spiral modes .
even an increase in the stellar central surface density by a factor of few failed to produce any global spiral modes .
thus our findings provide a natural explanation for the observed dearth of strong large - scale spiral structure in the lsbs .
our results differ from those obtained in paper 1 where the galactic disk was treated as a fluid , where it was found that the dominant dark matter halo had a negligible constraining effect on the existence of global spiral modes in these galaxies .
this difference is due to the different dispersion relation for fluid and collisionless systems , which played a pivotal role in determining the discrete global mode(s ) present in a model .
thus the correct collisionless treatment for stars as done here has led us to a result for the non - existence of global spiral modes which is in agreement with the observations . as a check , for the galaxy we carried out a similar modal analysis and found that the dark matter halo has a negligible effect on the global spiral modes , as expected since the galaxy is not dark matter dominated in the inner regions , in contrast to ugc 7321 .
thus , the dark matter halo that dominates from the innermost regions is shown to suppress the growth of local , swing - amplified non - axisymmetric features @xcite as well as the global spiral modes as shown here .
* acknowledgements : * we thank the anonymous referee for the constructive comments that have helped to improve the paper .
cj would like to thank the dst , government of india for support via j.c .
bose fellowship ( sb / s2/jcb-31/2014 ) .
banerjee a. , jog c.j .
2013 , mnras , 431 , 582b | low surface brightness lsb galaxies characterized by low star formation rate low disk surface density spiral structure in lsbs often incipient fragmentary faint difficult to trace strong large - scale spiral structure normal hsb galaxies like milky way interested only in small lsbs more abundant include giant lsbs like malin 1 some giant lsbs show strong large - scale spiral structure in ugc 6614 dynamically similar to high surface brightness counterparts @xcite applied density - wave theory decomposition rotation curve in lsbs sample contains giant lsb ugc 6614 large - scale spiral structure lsbs dark matter dominated from inner regions dark matter constitutes about per cent of total mass lsbs hsbs dark matter halo mass stellar mass comparable lsbs laboratory study effect of dark matter halo on galactic dynamics studies shown effect dominant dark matter halo global non - axisymmetric bar modes galactic disks superthin swing amplification mechanism explaining lack of small - scale spiral structuredensity wave theory grand - design spiral arms are high density regions of rotating spiral density wave defined pattern speed generated by gravity of unperturbed disk and density wave recent review see @xcite work paper 1 investigated role dominant dark matter halo on global spiral modes treating galactic disk as fluid superthin lsb galaxy ugc 7321 for 7321 dark matter halo negligible effect global spiral modes when disk modeled as fluid contrast to results for small - scale spiral features dark matter amplified spiral structures ghosh et al . paper argued lsbs isolated tidal interactions less likely high surface brightness galaxies global spiral modes permitted in fluid disk plus dark matter halo model lack of tidal interaction difficult for global spiral structure to develop in these galaxies paper effect of dark matter halo on global modes modeling galactic disk as @xmath2 system tidal encounter likely global modes simulations dispersion relation for @xmath2 disk to construct global standing - wave solutions bohr - sommerfeld quantization condition details see paper 1fluid disks allow wavelike solutions at small wavelengths fluid pressure restoring force collisionless disks suppress wavelike modes for small wavelengths 2 contains formulation problem input parameters 3 wkb analysis quantization rule 4 5 contain results discussion 6 conclusions model galactic disk collisionless system exponential surface density @xmath3 one - dimensional velocity dispersion @xmath4 galactic disk infinitesimally thin interested in perturbations mid - plane dark matter halo non - responsive to gravitational perturbations used cylindrical coordinates @xmath6 analysis models for effect dark matter halo on global spiral modes dynamics disk calculated under gravity disk - alone joint gravity disk dark matter halo plus halo case exponential stellar disk central surface density @xmath7 disk scalelength @xmath8 embedded in concentric dark matter halo pseudo - isothermal profile core density @xmath9 core radius @xmath10net angular frequency @xmath11 epicyclic frequency @xmath12 for galactic disk in dark matter halo as + @xmath13 expressions for @xmath14 @xmath15 for exponential disk @xmath16 @xmath17 for pseudo - isothermal halo calculated earlier see paper 1 in early - type galaxies bulge component dominates in inner regions exclusion bulge rotation curve inclusion of bulge yielded more realistic results ugc 7321 has no discernible bulge @xcite for included bulge in disk - alone disk plus dark matter halo models adopt plummer - kuzmin bulge model for by total bulge mass @xmath18 bulge scalelength @xmath19 expressions for @xmath20 @xmath21 - plane for bulge plummer - kuzmin profile in paper 1 @xmath20 @xmath21 terms added in quadrature to terms due to disk dark matter halo input parameters for components of ugc 7321 @xcite galaxy summarized in table 1 modes extend to resonance points @xmath22 not equal to zero for modes in fig .,title="fig:",width=326,height=230 modes extend to resonance points consistent @xmath22 not equal to zero for modes fig . fig3]:",width=336,height=230 from table 2 dark matter halo negligible effect on global spiral modes galaxy difference only in change specific values pattern speed @xmath23 par with expectation dark matter halo not important in inner regions galaxy results consistent with results paper 1 galactic disk modeled as fluid disk key difference specific values of pattern speed @xmath23 global modes different see table 3 paper 1 @xcite found range of @xmath24 km s@xmath25 kpc@xmath25 for pattern speed of spiral arms galaxy pattern speed values paper outside observed range shape of closed contours figs 1 - 3 different from paper 1 curve of constant @xmath23 had identical @xmath22 values at turning points paper 1 contours slanted in present paper @xmath22 values turning points substantially different due to difference in dispersion relation for two cases detailed interpretation not possible dispersion relation for collisionless case transcendental form not included low velocity dispersion component gas in system could modify range pattern speedslate - type spiral galaxy contains gas gas plays significant role in dynamical issues * ? ? ? gas in ugc 7321 small to hsb galaxies results for ugc 7321 suppression of global modes by dominant dark matter halo unlikely to change significantly if gas included effect of gas on global spiral modes in two - component system gas - rich hsb galaxies in future paper results based on assumption grand - design spiral structure in disk galaxies due to density waves @xcite hypothesis not fully confirmed observationally angular off - set in age of stellar population predicted by density wave theory not found in studies by @xcite in late - type disk galaxies study of @xmath26 observation of ngc 1068 pattern speed of spiral structure varies rapidly with radius of short - lived spiral features study of gas content @xmath27 line of sight velocity distribution in ngc 6754 revealed different streaming motion in trailing and leading edge of galaxy spiral arms likely to transient @xcite presented study pitch angle for disk galaxies pitch angle varies predicted classical density wave theory evidence for validity density - wave theory spiral structure in disk galaxies @xmath28-body studies show long - lived spiral structure spiral arms transient wound up quickly against classical density wave picture opposite trend in recent work @xcite reported long - lived spiral structure in study galaxies with intermediate bulges investigated effect of dominant dark matter halo on global spiral arms modeling galactic disk collisionless wkb dispersion relation bohr - sommerfeld quantization condition used discrete global spiral modes analysed superthin lsb galaxy ugc 7321 galaxy for ugc 7321 disk - alone plus dark matter halo cases yield discrete global spiral modes increase in stellar central surface density by factor few produce global spiral modes findings provide explanation for dearth of strong large - scale spiral structure in lsbs results differ from paper 1 galactic disk fluid dominant dark matter halo had negligible effect global spiral modesdifference due to different dispersion relation for fluid collisionless systems discrete global mode(s ) in model correct collisionless treatment for stars led to result non - existence global spiral modes agreement with observations galaxy similar modal analysis dark matter halo negligible effect on global spiral modes not dark matter dominated contrast to ugc 7321 dark matter halo growth of local swing - amplified non - axisymmetric features global spiral modes thank anonymous referee for constructive comments paper dst government of india for support via j.c. bose fellowship ( ) banerjee a. , jog c.j . 2013 , mnras , 431 , 582b | 0.502177 | 3,143 | 1,533 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,049 | we introduce cp trajectory diagram in bi - probability space " as a powerful tool for pictorial representation of the genuine cp and the matter effects in neutrino oscillations .
existence of the correlated ambiguity in a determination of cp violating phase @xmath0 and the sign of @xmath1 is uncovered .
principles of tuning beam energy for a given baseline distance are proposed to resolve the ambiguity and to maximize the cp - odd effect .
we finally point out , quite contrary to what is usually believed , that the ambiguity may be resolved with 50 % chance in the super - jhf experiment despite its relatively short baseline of 300 km .
= 1.cm and | probing into cp violation in the lepton sector is one of the most challenging goals in particle physics .
long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments are the prime candidates for observational means for detecting such effect .
however , it has been known since sometime ago that the earth matter effect acts as a contamination to the measurement of genuine cp violating effects due to the leptonic kobayashi - maskawa phase in such experiments @xcite .
therefore , it is of crucial importance to achieve a complete understanding of the features of interplay between the genuine cp and the matter effects to have a realistic design of experiments for measuring the cp violating phase .
we describe in this article a new powerful tool which we call cp trajectory diagram in bi - probability space " @xcite .
it enables us to represent pictorially the three effects , the effects of ( a ) genuine cp violation due to the @xmath2 term , ( b ) cp conserving @xmath3 term , and ( c ) fake cp violation due to earth matter , separately in a single diagram . by using the cp trajectory diagram
we observe that there is a two - fold ambiguity in the determination of @xmath0 which is related with the sign of @xmath1 . as described in detail in ref .
@xcite , this is a remnant of the approximate degeneracy in the vacuum oscillation probability under the transformations ( @xmath4 ) and ( @xmath5 ) .
we then discuss principles of tuning beam energy for a given baseline distance to resolve the ambiguity , and to maximize the cp - violating effect . finally , we point out that the ambiguity may be resolved with 50 % chance in the super - jhf experiment @xcite with a megaton class water cherenkov detector .
it is quite contrary to the conventional belief that the sign of @xmath1 can not be determined with such a short baseline as @xmath6 km . in a companion article , which is a report for the proceedings of taup2001 @xcite
, we discuss further physical implications of our results .
in particular , we explore the possibility of an _ in situ _ simultaneous measurement of @xmath0 and the sign of @xmath1 in a single experiment .
we now introduce the cp trajectory diagram in bi - probability space spanned by @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
suppose that we compute the oscillation probability @xmath9 and @xmath10 with a given set of oscillation and experimental parameters .
then , we draw a dot on the two - dimensional plane spanned by @xmath9 and @xmath10 . when @xmath0 is varied we have a set of dots which forms a closed trajectory , closed because the probability must be a periodic function of @xmath0 , a phase variable . in fig
1 plotted is the contours of oscillation probabilities @xmath9 and @xmath10 which is drawn by varying the cp violating phase @xmath0 from 0 to @xmath11 .
they are averaged over the gaussian neutrino energy distribution with peak energy of 500 mev and width 100 mev .
as you might have guessed , these diagrams are elliptic .
it is so exactly in vacuum and in a good approximation even in matter at relatively short baseline and as far as the mass hierarchy @xmath12 is the case @xcite .
what does cp trajectory diagram actually represent ?
there is a very simple answer to this question .
the lengths of major and minor axes represent the coefficients of cp violating @xmath13 and cp conserving @xmath14 terms , respectively , in the neutrino oscillation probability @xmath15 . whereas the distance between two ( positive and negative @xmath1 ) ellipses
gives the size of the matter effect .
the last point can be explicitly verified by running the same calculation with twice larger matter effects , as done in ref .
therefore , you can see the size of these three terms just by eye when it was projected onto the cp trajectory diagram . 0.3 cm -2.0 cm fig .
1 : cp trajectory in the bi - probability ( given in % ) plane for the baseline @xmath16 km and energy @xmath17 mev . as indicated in the figures , the solid and the dashed lines are for @xmath18 and @xmath19 cases , respectively , and the dotted and the dash - dotted lines correspond to the same signs of @xmath1 as above but with matter effect switched off .
the mixing parameters are fixed as @xmath20 ev@xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 ev@xmath21 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 .
we take @xmath26 g/@xmath27 where @xmath28 is the matter density and @xmath29 is the electron fraction . 0.5
cm it is obvious from fig .
1 that the approximate degeneracy ( @xmath4 ) and ( @xmath5 ) which exists in the vacuum case is lifted by the matter effect ; matter helps !
however , it is also clearly seen in fig .
1 that there are remaining degeneracies if the sign of @xmath1 is not known _
a priori_. the above discussion assumes that the value of @xmath30 is known prior to the experiment .
if the value is not known in advance there is an another ambiguity , the ( @xmath31 ) ambiguity , as discussed in detail in ref .
therefore , there exits a combined ambiguity , ( @xmath0 @xmath32 sign of @xmath1 ) times ( @xmath31 ) , which in the worst case can be 4-fold . the ambiguity was referred to as the `` clover - leaf ambiguity '' in taup2001 @xcite .
if one wants to resolve the two - fold ambiguity ( @xmath0 @xmath32 sign of @xmath1 ) in a single experiment one can not tune the experimental parameters so that the @xmath13 term is maximal because then the trajectory shrinks to a straight line , closing the possibility of resolution of the ambiguity . then , there should be a compromise .
first , one can obtain the conditions to maximize lengths of major and minor axes , which lead to @xcite @xmath33 it is shown in ref .
@xcite that one can compromize these two requirements in the energy region of 0.5 to 2 gev .
we now address our final subject , probably the most important one , the possibility of simultaneous determination of @xmath0 and @xmath1 in the super - jhf experiment .
we assume that @xmath30 is known in a reasonable accuracy prior to this experiment . in fig .
2 plotted is the cp trajectory diagram in the number of appearance events plane for @xmath34 and @xmath35 channels .
we assume a water cherenkov detector of fiducial volume 0.9 mton , and 4 mw of proton beam power which is planned in the jhf experiment in its phase ii @xcite .
we use the off - axis ( oa ) 3 degree beam whose neutrino energy peaks at @xmath36 gev .
we refer ref .
@xcite for a detailed explanation of how the computation of number of events is done and the results for alternative choice of beams .
one can clearly see from fig .
2 that at least a half of the parameter space fulfilling the condition @xmath37 does not suffer from the ambiguity problem . then ,
with the 50 % chance ( thanks to nature s kind setting ! ) they will be able to determine the cp violating angle @xmath0 and the sign of @xmath1 simultaneously in the super - jhf experiment .
0.2 cm -2.0 cm fig .
2 : cp trajectory in event number plane @xmath38 for oa beam 3 degree and the baseline @xmath16 km .
the dotted circles correspond to 3 @xmath39 statistical uncertainty .
this work was supported by the brazilian funding agency fundao de amparo pesquisa do estado de so paulo ( fapesp ) , and by the grant - in - aid for scientific research in priority areas no . 12047222 , japan ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology .
j. arafune and j. sato , phys . rev .
* d55 * ( 1997 ) 1653 ; j. arafune , m. koike and j. sato , phys . rev . * d56 * ( 1997 ) 3093 [ erratum _ ibid . _ * d 60 * ( 1999 ) 119905 ] ; h. minakata and h. nunokawa , phys . rev .
* d57 * ( 1998 ) 4403 ; phys .
b413 * ( 1997 ) 369 ; _ ibid . _
* b495 * ( 2000 ) 369 ; k. dick , m. freund , m. lindner and a. romanino , nucl .
b * 562 * ( 1999 ) 29 ; o. yasuda , acta .
* b 30 * ( 1999 ) 3089 ; m. koike and j. sato , phys . rev . * d61 * ( 2000 ) 073012 ; erratum _ ibid . _ * d 62 * ( 2000 ) 079903 ; a. cervera , a. donini , m. b. gavela , j. j. gomez cadenas , p. hernandez , o. mena and s. rigolin , nucl . phys .
* b579 * ( 2000 ) 17 [ _ erratum - ibid .
_ * b593 * ( 2000 ) 731 ] ; s. j. parke and t. j. weiler , phys .
* b501 * ( 2001 ) 106 . | probing cp violation in lepton sector challenging in particle physics long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments prime candidates for detecting effect earth matter effect measurement genuine cp violating effects leptonic kobayashi - maskawa phase crucial understanding of interplay between genuine cp matter effects realistic design of experiments for measuring cp violating phase new tool cp trajectory diagram in bi - probability space three effects genuine cp violation due @xmath2 term cp conserving @xmath3 term fake cp violation due to earth matter in diagram two - fold ambiguity in determination of @xmath0 related with sign of @xmath1 remnant of approximate degeneracy in vacuum oscillation probability under transformations ( @xmath4 ) and @xmath5 ) discuss principles tuning beam energy for baseline distance to resolve ambiguity maximize cp - violating effect ambiguity may resolved with 50 % chance in super - jhf experiment with megaton class water cherenkov detector contrary to belief sign of @xmath1 determined with short baseline as @xmath6 km companion article discuss physical implications of resultsexplore simultaneous measurement @xmath0 @xmath1 in single experiment introduce cp trajectory diagram in bi - probability space @xmath7 @xmath8 compute oscillation probability @xmath9 @xmath10 with oscillation experimental parameters draw dot on two - dimensional plane @xmath9 @xmath0 varied dots closed trajectory probability periodic function of @xmath0 phase variable fig 1 contours of oscillation probabilities @xmath9 @xmath10 drawn by varying cp violating phase @xmath0 from 0 to @xmath11 averaged over gaussian neutrino energy distribution peak energy 500 mev width 100 mev diagrams elliptic vacuum matter short baseline mass hierarchy @xmath12 case @xcite cp trajectory diagram lengths of major minor axes represent coefficients of cp violating @xmath13 cp conserving @xmath14 terms in neutrino oscillation probability @xmath15 distance between two @xmath1 ellipses gives size matter effect verified calculation with larger matter effects see size of three terms projected onto cp trajectory diagram 0.3 cm -2.0 cm fig .cp trajectory bi - probability % plane baseline @xmath16 km energy @xmath17 mev figures solid dashed lines for @xmath18 @xmath19 cases dotted dash - dotted lines same signs @xmath1 matter effect switched off mixing parameters fixed @xmath20@xmath21 ev@xmath21 @xmath25 @xmath26 g/@xmath27 @xmath28 matter density @xmath29 electron fraction 0.5 cm approximate degeneracy ( @xmath4 ) @xmath5 ) vacuum case lifted by matter effect remaining degeneracies if sign @xmath1 not known assumes value @xmath30 known prior experiment if value not known another ambiguity ( @xmath31 ) ambiguity discussed exits combined ambiguity ( @xmath0 @xmath32 sign @xmath1 ) times ( @xmath31 ) worst case 4-fold ambiguity `` clover - leaf ambiguity '' taup2001 @xcite resolve two - fold ambiguity @xmath0 @xmath32 @xmath1 single experiment can not tune experimental parameters @xmath13 term maximal trajectory shrinks straight line resolution ambiguity compromise .obtain conditions maximize lengths major minor axes lead to @xcite @xmath33 compromize requirements energy region 0.5 to 2 gev address final subject possibility simultaneous determination @xmath0 @xmath1 super - jhf experiment assume @xmath30 known fig . 2 cp trajectory diagram events plane @xmath34 @xmath35 channels assume water cherenkov detector volume 0.9 mton 4 mw proton beam power planned jhf experiment phase ii use off - axis ) 3 degree beam neutrino energy peaks at @xmath36 gev refer ref . @xcite explanation computation number events results alternative choice beams 2 half parameter space fulfilling condition @xmath37 ambiguity problem 50 % chance determine cp violating angle @xmath0 sign @xmath1 simultaneously super - jhf experiment 0.2 -2.0 fig . 2 cp trajectory event number plane @xmath38 oa beam 3 degree baseline @xmath16 km dotted circles correspond to 3 @xmath39 statistical uncertainty work supported by brazilian funding agency grant - in - aid scientific research 12047222 japan ministry of education culture sports science technologysato phys rev d55 1997 ) 1653 j. arafune koike j sato d56 1997 ) 3093 erratum 60 1999 ) 119905 h. minakata nunokawa d57 1998 ) 4403 b413 1997 ) 369 b495 2000 ) 369 k. dick m. freund lindner. romanino 562 1999 ) 29 yasuda 30 1999 ) 3089 m. koike j. sato rev d61 2000 ) 073012 erratum d 62 2000 ) 079903 a. cervera. donini. gavela gomez cadenas p. hernandez o. mena s. rigolin b579 2000 ) 17 erratum b593 2000 ) 731 s j. parke t. j. weiler phys b501 2001 ) 106 . | 0.316399 | 2,139 | 1,116 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,055 | the dynamics of the one - dimensional @xmath0-state potts model , in the zero temperature limit , can be formulated through the motion of random walkers which either annihilate ( @xmath1 ) or coalesce ( @xmath2 ) with a @xmath0-dependent probability .
we consider all of the walkers in this model to be mutually infectious .
whenever two walkers meet , they experience mutual contamination .
walkers which avoid an encounter with another random walker up to time @xmath3 remain uninfected .
the fraction of uninfected walkers is known to obey a power law decay @xmath4 , with a nontrivial exponent @xmath5 [ c. monthus , phys .
rev .
e * 54 * , 4844 ( 1996 ) ; s. n. majumdar and s. j. cornell , _ ibid . _ * 57 * , 3757 ( 1998 ) ] .
we probe the numerical values of @xmath5 to a higher degree of accuracy than previous simulations and relate the exponent @xmath5 to the persistence exponent @xmath6 [ b. derrida , v.hakim and v. pasquier , phys .
rev .
lett . * 75 * , 751 ( 1995 ) ] , through the relation @xmath7 where @xmath8 is a new exponent introduced in [ s. j. odonoghue and a. j. bray , cond - mat/0111133 ] .
our study is extended to include the coupled diffusion - limited reaction @xmath9 , @xmath10 in one - dimension with equal initial densities of @xmath11 and @xmath12 particles .
we find that the density of walkers decays in this model as @xmath13 .
the fraction of sites unvisited by either an @xmath11 or a @xmath12 particle is found to obey a power law , @xmath14 with @xmath15 .
we discuss these exponents within the context of the @xmath0-state potts model and present numerical evidence that the fraction of walkers which remain uninfected decays as @xmath16 , where @xmath17 when infection occurs between like particles only , and @xmath18 when we also include cross - species contamination .
we find that the relation between @xmath19 and @xmath20 in this model can also be characterized by an exponent @xmath8 , where similarly , @xmath21 . 2 | when a system is quenched from a homogeneous high - temperature disordered state into a low - temperature regime , well defined domains of equilibrium ordered phases form randomly and then grow with time ( `` coarsen '' ) in a self - similar way , until the domain size becomes comparable to the size of the system @xcite .
a dynamic scaling hypothesis suggests that , at late times , the evolution of the system is characterized by a single length scale @xmath22 that represents a typical linear size of the domains .
it is well established , at least for systems with a scalar order parameter , that @xmath23 with @xmath24 for _ non - conserved _ dynamics and @xmath25 for _ conserved _ dynamics @xcite .
the ising spin model evolving with glauber spin flip dynamics @xcite demonstrates behavior characteristic of the former while evolution according to kawasaki spin dynamics @xcite exemplifies the latter .
a generalization of the glauber - ising model is the @xmath0-state potts model @xcite , which has @xmath0 distinct , but equivalent , ordered phases .
experimental realizations are known for @xmath26 i.e. the ising model and for @xmath27 @xcite .
the @xmath28 case describes several cellular structures @xcite , e.g. polycrystals @xcite , soap froths @xcite , magnetic bubbles @xcite and foams @xcite .
such coarsening systems are amongst those which have received considerable attention in recent years with regard to their _ persistence _ properties @xcite .
the persistence probability @xmath29 is simply the probability that a given stochastic variable @xmath30 , with zero mean , does not change sign in the time interval @xmath31 $ ] .
theoretical and computational studies of persistence include spin systems in one @xcite and higher @xcite dimensions , diffusion fields @xcite , fluctuating interfaces @xcite , phase - ordering dynamics @xcite , lotka - volterra models @xcite and reaction - diffusion systems @xcite .
experimental studies include the coarsening dynamics of breath figures @xcite , foams @xcite , soap froths @xcite , twisted nematic liquid crystals @xcite , and one - dimensional gas diffusion @xcite .
persistence in non - equilibrium critical phenomena has also been studied in the context of the global order parameter @xmath32 ( e.g. the total magnetization of a ferromagnet ) , regarded as a stochastic process @xcite . in many systems of physical interest
, the persistence decays algebraically according to @xmath33 , where @xmath20 is the persistence exponent and is , in general , nontrivial .
the non - triviality of @xmath20 emerges as a consequence of the coupling of the field @xmath30 to its neighbors , since such coupling implies that the stochastic process at a fixed point in space and time is non - markovian . for the @xmath0-state potts model at @xmath34 ,
the fraction of spins which have never flipped up to time @xmath3 ( i.e that fraction that have _ persisted _ in their original phase ) , has been observed @xcite to obey a power law decay @xmath35 , where @xmath6 has been obtained exactly , in one - dimension ( 1d ) , by derrida _
@xcite for arbitrary @xmath0 , @xmath36 ^ 2 .
\label{eq1}\ ] ] there is a very direct way @xcite of relating the glauber dynamics of the 1d @xmath0-state potts model at zero temperature to reaction - diffusion models @xcite .
consider uncorrelated initial conditions where each of the @xmath0 phases is present with equal density @xmath37 . during any time interval @xmath38
, each spin @xmath39 has a probability @xmath40 of becoming equal to its right neighbor , @xmath40 of becoming equal to its left neighbor and a probability @xmath41 of retaining its own value .
the domain walls therefore perform random walks . upon contact ,
two domain walls react instantaneously , either _ annihilating _ @xmath42 with probability @xmath43 or _ coalescing _ @xmath2 with probability @xmath44 , these numbers being the probabilities that the states on the far sides of the walkers are the same ( annihilation ) or different ( coalescence ) .
this reaction - diffusion model , together with the fact that in the initial condition each bond is occupied by a domain wall with probability @xmath45 , is completely equivalent to the spin problem .
the fraction of spins which have never flipped up to time @xmath3 is then simply the fraction of sites which have never been visited by a random walker .
the probabilistic algorithm for implementing the potts model through the annihilation or coalescence of random walkers allows @xmath0 to be a real number but is restricted to @xmath46 . however , an equivalent ising spin representation of the potts persistence problem @xcite permits a study @xcite of @xmath6 in the regime @xmath47 . in the present work we study the fraction of random walkers which have never encountered another walker , using the reaction - diffusion representation of the 1d glauber - potts model at zero temperature . to facilitate our discussion ,
we consider all the random walkers at time @xmath48 to be uninfected .
all the walkers are , however , considered to be infectious , so that for @xmath49 any contact between walkers ( assuming they survive the encounter ) leads to mutual contamination .
walkers that avoid all contact remain uninfected .
our goal , therefore , is to address the fraction of uninfected walkers @xmath50 up to time @xmath3 .
this problem has been addressed in some detail by a number of different authors @xcite , although under the guise of a different interpretation .
the general approach used involves monitoring the motion of a tagged test particle , released in the system at time @xmath51 .
if the tagged particle diffuses with diffusion constant @xmath52 and the other particles in the system diffuse with diffusion constant @xmath53 , the tagged particle is viewed as an external impurity diffusing through a homogeneous background .
one is then interested in addressing the survival probability of the tagged particle i.e. , the probability is has not been absorbed by another particle in the system .
of course in our terminology , this corresponds to the probability that the tagged particle remains uninfected .
it is well established @xcite that @xmath50 decays according to a power law @xmath54 , where @xmath55 is the ratio of the two diffusion constants in the problem .
when @xmath56 , corresponding to a static impurity , the model clearly maps onto the problem of persistent spins and in this case , @xmath57 .
the exponent @xmath58 is therefore considered a generalization of the standard persistence exponent @xmath6 , characterizing the survival probability of a mobile particle under the coarsening dynamics of the potts model .
a recent study of the survival probability of a mobile particle , moving according to either deterministic or stochastic rules , in given in @xcite , where the external fluctuating field takes the form of either the solution to the diffusion equation , the coarsening dynamics of the @xmath0-state potts model or spatially uncorrelated brownian signals . in the limit @xmath59
the potts model is equivalent to the @xmath60 single species coalescence process .
the dynamics of this system are particularly simple , since each particle sees only the `` cage '' formed by its two nearest neighbors .
it is immaterial that these neighbors may coalesce with more distant particles .
consequently , the kinetics of each particle involves only itself and its two nearest neighbors and one is therefore able to calculate @xmath61 exactly @xcite : @xmath62}\ . \label{inf}\ ] ] ( note that for @xmath63 , this of course reduces to the static persistence exponent , @xmath64 . ) in the limit of the ising model ( @xmath65 ) , there is , however , no corresponding exact result for general @xmath66 .
an exact result is only known for @xmath63 i.e. , @xmath67 .
a mean - field smoluchowski @xcite approach predicts for @xmath65 and general @xmath66 that , @xmath68 , in good agreement with numerical simulations @xcite .
however , when extended to the large @xmath0 limit , this smoluchowski approach differs substantially from the exact @xmath69 result eq .
( [ inf ] ) .
more recently , however , a perturbation theory developed by monthus @xcite has evaluated the exponent @xmath58 to first order in @xmath70 for arbitrary @xmath66 and at first order in @xmath66 for arbitrary @xmath0 . in this paper
, we will not study the exponent @xmath58 in complete generality since we are primarily interested in the special case where all of the particles are equally mobile @xmath71 and henceforth we therefore write @xmath72 . within the context of the current work , where we are interested in the case @xmath73 , the random walkers represent the motion of domain walls undergoing zero temperature coarsening .
the fraction of uncollided domain walls ( i.e. , uninfected walkers ) has previously been interpreted as `` domain wall persistence '' or equally , the probability that two adjacent domains survive . under this interpretation ,
majumdar _ et al .
_ @xcite have studied the quantity @xmath50 numerically for various @xmath0 .
they observed a power law decay , @xmath74 in agreement with the results of monthus @xcite and obtained a spectrum of values for @xmath5 : @xmath75 , where @xmath76 . in this paper , we extend and improve these numerical results by presenting ( sec .
ii ) more accurate data than previously achieved @xcite and exploring a larger range of @xmath0 .
we also relate the value of @xmath5 to the static persistent exponent @xmath6 via @xmath7 , where @xmath8 is a new exponent that we recently introduced in @xcite .
we additionally consider ( sec .
iii ) the coupled diffusion - limited reaction @xmath9 , @xmath10 in one - dimension with equal initial densities , @xmath77 .
we find that the density of particles decays in this model according to @xmath78 , independent of the initial walker density , characteristic of `` potts like '' behavior @xcite .
the fraction of sites unvisited by either an @xmath11 or a @xmath12 particle decays as @xmath33 with @xmath15 .
we discuss these exponents within the context of the @xmath0-state potts model and observe that the fraction of walkers which remain uninfected by their _
own _ species decays according to @xmath79 , where @xmath80 .
we also study the fraction of walkers which remain uninfected by _ both _ species and find that this too obey a power law , with @xmath81 . in analogy to sec .
ii we express the exponent @xmath19 is terms of the static persistence exponent @xmath20 and similarly obtain @xmath21 .
we conclude in sec .
iv with a summary of the results and a discussion of some open questions .
we investigate numerically the fraction of uninfected walkers @xmath50 in the 1d @xmath0-state potts model , at zero temperature , as a function of @xmath0 .
our simulations are performed on a 1d lattice of size @xmath82 with periodic boundary conditions . at @xmath83 a random walker
is placed at each lattice site , so that @xmath84 .
we choose this initial high density of walkers to accelerate the system s evolution into the asymptotic regime .
our model is updated using the direct method @xcite i.e. at each computational step , a particle is picked at random and moved with probability @xmath85 to a neighboring site , where @xmath53 is the diffusion constant .
if the destination site is occupied , the two particles either annihilate , with probability @xmath43 , or coalesce , to become a single particle , with probability @xmath44 , in accordance with the reaction - diffusion dynamics of the potts model detailed in sec . i. for each move of a particle , time @xmath3 is increased by @xmath86 , where @xmath87 is the current number of particles in the system .
such sequential dynamics can be chosen without loss of generality as parallel dynamics exhibit similar asymptotic behavior @xcite .
our simulations are performed for @xmath88 time steps and our results are averaged over @xmath89 runs .
[ fig1 ] clearly shows that the fraction of uninfected walkers decays according to a power - law , @xmath90 . in table
i we present our numerical values for @xmath5 in the range @xmath91 .
these values were obtained by performing a linear regression on log - log curves such as those presented in fig.[fig1 ] .
the regression was taken in the range @xmath92 .
this range was chosen to avoid initial transients and to avoid statistical fluctuations between different runs which become prominent as @xmath3 increases , especially for large @xmath0 . in fig .
[ fig2 ] we plot @xmath19 as a function of @xmath0 , where we choose to represent the data on a linear - log plot merely for clarity of presentation . [ cols="^,^",options="header " , ] table vi . numerical results for the exponent @xmath8 in various 1d models for which @xmath93^{\gamma}$ ] ( results for the first two models from ref
@xcite ) .
finally , we note that all values of @xmath8 obtained so far lie in the range @xmath94 spanned by the @xmath0-state potts model with @xmath95 . up to now our analysis of @xmath8 has been purely numerical , and naturally a more fundamental understanding of this exponent is required .
we thank satya majumdar for drawing our attention to some related work .
this work was supported by epsrc ( uk ) . | system quenched from high - temperature into low - temperature defined domains of equilibrium ordered phases form randomly grow with time until domain size comparable to size system dynamic scaling hypothesis suggests late evolution single length scale @xmath22 typical linear size of domains scalar order @xmath23 @xmath24 for non - conserved dynamics @xmath25 for conserved dynamics ising spin model evolving with glauber spin flip dynamics demonstrates behavior former evolution according to kawasaki spin dynamics exemplifies latter generalization of glauber - ising model is @xmath0-state potts model distinct equivalent ordered phases experimental realizations known for @xmath26 @xmath27 @xcite @xmath28 case describes cellular structures polycrystals soap froths magnetic bubbles foams coarsening systems received attention persistence properties persistence probability @xmath29 stochastic variable @xmath30 with zero mean change in time interval @xmath31computational studies of persistence include spin systems higher dimensions diffusion fields fluctuating interfaces phase - ordering dynamics lotka - volterra models reaction - diffusion systems experimental studies include coarsening dynamics of breath figures foams soap froths twisted nematic liquid crystals one - dimensional gas diffusion persistence in non - equilibrium phenomena studied in global order parameter @xmath32 total magnetization of ferromagnet stochastic process persistence decays algebraically according to @xmath33 @xmath20 persistence exponent nontrivial non - triviality coupling of field @xmath30 to neighbors implies stochastic process at fixed point non - markovian for @xmath0-state potts model at @xmath34 fraction of spins never flipped to time persisted in original phase observed to obey power law decay @xmath35 @xmath6 obtained in one - dimension by derrida glauber dynamics of 1d-state potts model at zero temperature to reaction - diffusion modelsuncorrelated initial conditions @xmath0 phases equal density @xmath37 time interval @xmath38 each spin @xmath39 probability @xmath40 equal right left neighbor own value domain walls perform random walks contact two walls react annihilating @xmath42 probability @xmath43 or coalescing @xmath2 @xmath44 states far sides walkers same or different reaction - diffusion model initial condition each bond occupied by domain wall probability @xmath45 equivalent to spin problem fraction of spins never flipped time @xmath3 fraction sites never visited by random walker probabilistic algorithm potts model annihilation coalescence allows @xmath0 real number restricted to @xmath46 equivalent spin representation potts persistence problem permits study @xmath6 in regime @xmath47 work study fraction of random walkers never encountered another walker reaction - diffusion representation 1d glauber - potts model at zero temperature all random walkers at time @xmath48 uninfected all walkers infectious @xmath49 contact between walkers leads to mutual contamination walkers avoid contact remain uninfectedgoal address uninfected walkers @xmath50 up to @xmath3 problem addressed by authors different interpretation approach monitoring motion of tagged test particle at @xmath51 if tagged particle diffuses with diffusion constant @xmath52 other particles diffuse with @xmath53 viewed as external impurity diffusing through homogeneous background survival probability of tagged particle not absorbed by another particle corresponds to probability particle remains uninfected @xmath50 decays according to power law @xmath54 @xmath55 ratio of two diffusion constants @xmath56 static impurity model maps onto problem of persistent spins @xmath57 exponent @xmath58 generalization of standard persistence exponent @xmath6 survival probability of mobile particle under coarsening dynamics of potts model recent study of survival probability mobile particle @xcite external fluctuating field solution to diffusion equation coarsening dynamics @xmath0 potts model or uncorrelated brownian signals in limit @xmath59 potts model equivalent to @xmath60 single species coalescence process dynamics system simple each particle sees cage formed by two nearest neighborsimmaterial neighbors coalesce with distant particles kinetics each particle involves itself two nearest neighbors calculate @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 reduces to static persistence exponent @xmath64 limit ising model @xmath65 no exact result for @xmath66 exact result only known for @xmath63 @xmath67 mean - field smoluchowski @xcite approach predicts for @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath68 with numerical simulations extended to large @xmath0 limit approach differs from exact @xmath69 result perturbation theory monthus @xcite evaluated exponent @xmath58 to first order @xmath70 for arbitrary @xmath66 first order @xmath66 for arbitrary @xmath0 not study exponent @xmath58 interested in special case particles equally mobile @xmath71 write @xmath72 current work interested case @xmath73 random walkers represent motion domain walls undergoing zero temperature coarsening fraction of uncollided domain walls interpreted as domain wall persistence probability two adjacent domains survive majumdar et al . studied quantity @xmath50 for various @xmath0observed power law decay @xmath74 results monthus @xcite obtained values @xmath5 @xmath75 @xmath76 improve numerical results presenting more accurate data exploring larger range @xmath0 relate value @xmath5 to static persistent exponent @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 new exponent introduced @xcite consider coupled diffusion - limited reaction @xmath9 @xmath10 one - dimension equal initial densities @xmath77 density of particles decays @xmath78 independent initial walker density characteristic potts like behavior fraction sites unvisited @xmath11 or @xmath12 particle decays @xmath33 @xmath15 discuss exponents @xmath0-state potts model fraction walkers uninfected species decays @xmath79 @xmath80 study fraction walkers uninfected both species obey power law @xmath81 express exponent @xmath19 static persistence exponent @xmath20 obtain @xmath21 conclude summary results discussion open questions investigate fraction uninfected walkers @xmath50 in 1d @xmath0-state potts model zero temperature function of @xmath0simulations performed on 1d lattice @xmath82 periodic boundary conditions at @xmath83 random walker at each lattice site high density walkers accelerate system evolution into asymptotic regime model updated using direct method @xcite each step particle moved @xmath85 to neighboring site @xmath53 diffusion constant if destination site occupied two particles annihilate or coalesce single particle @xmath44 reaction - diffusion dynamics potts model each move particle time @xmath3 increased by @xmath86 @xmath87 current number particles sequential dynamics chosen without loss of generality parallel dynamics similar asymptotic behavior simulations performed for @xmath88 time steps results averaged over @xmath89 runs fraction of uninfected walkers decays power - law @xmath90 table i numerical values for @xmath5 range @xmath91 values obtained linear regression on log - log curves regression in range @xmath92 avoid initial transients statistical fluctuations between runs @xmath3 increases plot @xmath19 as function of @xmath0 linear - log plot for claritycols="^,^",options="header " table vi numerical results exponent @xmath8 1d models @xmath93^{\gamma}$ results first two models @xcite ) all values @xmath8 range @xmath94 @xmath0-state potts model with @xmath95 analysis @xmath8 purely numerical fundamental understanding required thank satya majumdar related work supported by epsrc ( uk ) | 0.499973 | 3,085 | 1,583 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,060 | spectroscopic labels for a few particles with spin that are harmonically trapped in one - dimension with effectively zero - range interactions are provided by quantum numbers that characterize the symmetries of the hamiltonian : permutations of identical particles , parity inversion , and the separability of the center - of - mass .
the exact solutions for the non - interacting and infinitely repulsive cases are reduced with respect to these symmetries .
this reduction explains how states of single - component and multi - component fermions and bosons transform under adiabatic evolution from non - interacting to strong hard - core repulsion .
these spectroscopic methods also clarify previous analytic and numerical results for intermediate values of interaction strength .
several examples , including adiabatic mapping for two - component fermionic states in the cases @xmath0 , are provided .
the quantum system of a few particles in one dimension , confined by an external field and interacting via a short - range potential , has been a touchstone model for nuclear , atomic , statistical , and mathematical physics since the 1930 s .
this system possesses enough symmetry and regularity to be analytically tractable in many cases , but also manifests a rich enough phenomenological structure to serve as physically significant model for realistic systems .
this class of models has been a playground for studying the interplay of integrability and solvability , the emergence of universality in few - body phenomena , and the transition from few - body to many - body physics .
this article focuses specifically on the quantum system of @xmath1 particles of mass @xmath2 confined in a one - dimensional harmonic trap with frequency @xmath3 and interacting via an effectively zero - range potential .
the hamiltonian for the model is @xmath4 with the particle coordinates @xmath5 expressed in units of @xmath6 .
this hamiltonian has received intense attention recently because it serves as a model for neutral cold atoms with interactions tunable through the manipulation of feshbach and confinement - induced resonances trapped in extremely prolate , approximately harmonic optical wells @xcite .
the model has been used to investigate few - body and many - body properties of one - dimensional trapped ultracold gases of bosons @xcite , fermions @xcite , and mixtures of bosons and fermions @xcite .
the so - called unitary limit @xmath7 of hard - core repulsive interactions is known as the tonks - girardeau gas and has been realized in the laboratory with bosons @xcite , as has the metastable super - tonks - girardeau limit @xmath8 @xcite .
recent experiments in which the state of a few trapped , interacting fermions can be controlled and measured @xcite have generated excitement that tunable fermi gases will allow simulation of solid - state phenomena such as the transition to ferromagnetism @xcite .
the solutions of hamiltonian ( [ hammy ] ) form a complete basis for the spatial states of @xmath1 distinguishable particles , and these solutions can be symmetrized to account for identical bosons or fermions , whether single species or multi - component .
an exact , complete set of solutions of ( [ hammy ] ) are known when @xmath9 for all @xmath10 @xcite , and these solutions have become the benchmark for further theoretical investigations . for @xmath11 , a complete set of exact solutions
are known only for the interaction - free case @xmath12 and for the hard - core limit @xmath13 solutions are also energy eigenstates at @xmath14 , but they no longer form a complete basis due to the existence of bound states . ] . in the @xmath12 case , the system is equivalent to the well - known isotropic oscillator in @xmath1 dimensions . in the @xmath13 limit , @xmath15 independent solutions can be constructed from each @xmath12 fermionic solution @xcite by generalizing the famous bose - fermi mapping @xcite .
this mapping has also been generalized to construct exact solutions at @xmath16 for multi - component fermions @xcite , multi - component bosons @xcite and boson - fermion mixtures @xcite .
both sets of exact spatial solutions can be described using a unified spectroscopic framework .
the spectroscopic labels correspond to the irreducible representations ( irreps ) of the total symmetry group @xmath17 of the hamiltonian .
the group @xmath17 is isomorphic to the direct product @xmath18 , where @xmath19 is permutation symmetry , @xmath20 corresponds to parity and @xmath21 to contact symmetry of the one - dimensional harmonic oscillator in the separated center - of - mass variable .
the symmetry group @xmath17 holds for any interaction strength @xmath22 , so @xmath17 irrep labels serve as quantum numbers that are respected by the interparticle interaction for all values of @xmath10 , not just for the exact limits .
in this article , i argue that these spectroscopic labels can be used to help implement symmetrization , understand the transformation of states under rapid or adiabatic changes in the interaction parameter , and improve approximation schemes for states in the intermediate interaction regime .
many previous works have exploited the symmetry and representation theory of @xmath19 to construct symmetrized states , e.g. @xcite , but this treatment differs in three substantial ways .
first , the symmetrization and reduction into @xmath17 irreps in the @xmath12 and @xmath7 limits is facilitated by using the jacobi hypercylindrical coordinate system , defined below .
this coordinate system naturally incorporates the contact and dilation symmetries ( c.f .
@xcite ) of @xmath23 .
second , a method is used to construct spatial states with the right properties for symmetrizing multi - component spin systems that does not require explicitly constructing the spin state .
third , and perhaps most importantly , the group @xmath17 exhausts the symmetry of @xmath23 ( except for @xmath24 or @xmath25 ) , whereas @xmath19 does not .
therefore , for intermediate values of @xmath10 , each possible set of spectroscopic labels uniquely identifies a distinct degenerate energy subspace , and each subspace has the dimension of the corresponding @xmath17 irrep . when @xmath12 and @xmath13 the symmetry group of ( [ hammy ] ) is larger than @xmath17 but contains it as a subgroup .
that means the degenerate energy eigenspaces are reducible into irreps of @xmath17 , and they are usually not simply reducible .
the reduction problem for these two exact limits is solved in this article .
comparing the pattern of irreps of @xmath17 at @xmath12 and @xmath13 provides the generalization of the boson - fermion mapping to multicomponent cases or mixed symmetry . under adiabatic evolution of the interaction strength
, states follow this mapping .
the results of this method agree with recent calculations by other methods @xcite .
additionally , once this map is known , one can construct approximate solutions for intermediate interaction strengths from the extreme exact cases using variational methods ( c.f .
@xcite ) . in a subsequent work
i will show how this same spectroscopic framework also allows the dynamics arising from rapid variations of the interaction parameter , or quenches , to be described accurately and efficiently .
finally , the spectroscopic notation developed here clarifies results achieved by a variety of analytic and numerical approximation methods for intermediate values of @xmath10 @xcite .
these methods typically produce spectral graphs that are dense with crossing lines , but these lines can be assigned unique labels with this system . when the graphs are partitioned into @xmath17 irreps ,
there are no level crossings .
exact diagonalization methods that exploit this spectroscopic system will require fewer basis states to get the same accuracy because there are no interaction matrix elements between states in different @xmath17 irreps . | the total hilbert space for @xmath1 particles with @xmath26 accessible spin components and interaction strength @xmath10 is constructed as the tensor product @xmath27 of the spatial hilbert space @xmath28 and the spin hilbert space @xmath29 .
the hamiltonian @xmath23 ( [ hammy ] ) acts as the identity on @xmath30 , but it can be used to reduce @xmath31 into a direct sum of energy eigenspaces @xmath32 @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the spectrum of @xmath23 for a particular @xmath10 . because @xmath17 is a symmetry of @xmath23 , the space @xmath31
can also be reduced into a direct sum of irreps of @xmath17 labeled by the triplet @xmath35 , i.e.@xmath36 where @xmath37 labels the degeneracy of @xmath38-type irreps .
the three labels @xmath39 of the irreps correspond to the three factors of @xmath17
. first , the center - of - mass excitation quantum number @xmath40 labels the irreps for @xmath21 .
second , the parity quantum number @xmath41 labels the irrep for parity inversion .
the relative parity quantum number @xmath42 will be used instead of @xmath43 to remove the contribution due to the parity from the center - of - mass excitations since inversion of the just the center - of - mass coordinate is contained with the @xmath21 symmetry factor .
the third factor of @xmath17 is the symmetric group @xmath19 . here
i briefly summarize some notation for @xmath19 and its irreps as necessary for this article ; consult a standard reference like @xcite for details .
the group @xmath19 has @xmath15 elements corresponding to the permutations of @xmath1 objects .
the set of elements of @xmath19 decomposed into conjugacy classes for each partition @xmath44 of @xmath1 , e.g. for four particles there are five partitions @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 . for each conjugacy class
there is also an irrep of @xmath19 , and these are often depicted as standard young diagrams with @xmath1 boxes , e.g. @xmath50 .
the dimension of each irrep @xmath51 is the number of standard young tableaux for that diagram , i.e. the diagram s boxes are labeled such that rows of boxes always have an equal or increasing number as one moves to the right , and vertical boxes have always have increasing numbers . for a given @xmath1 ,
the irrep @xmath52 is one - dimensional and totally symmetric and the irrep @xmath53 is one - dimensional and totally antisymmetric .
all other irreps are multidimensional .
conjugate representations , in which rows and columns are exchanged , have the same dimension . within an irrep ,
each element of @xmath19 is represented by a @xmath51-dimensional matrix .
the traces of these matrices are called the characters of the representation , and all elements of @xmath19 from the same conjugacy class have the same character .
assuming there are no other symmetries of the hamiltonian than @xmath17 for the parameter range @xmath54 , then the degeneracy of any eigenvalue @xmath55 is constrained to be the dimension of an irrep of @xmath17 and there is a unique correspondence between each energy degeneracy subspace @xmath32 and a specific irrep @xmath56 .
this correspondence will not change as @xmath10 is adiabatically tuned within the range @xmath54 , even though energy of the subspace may vary .
therefore the energy levels in the subspace @xmath57 do not cross or reorder as @xmath10 is varied from non - interacting to hard - core repulsion .
if they did cross at some @xmath10 , this would imply an additional symmetry of @xmath23 for that particular value of interaction strength . to my knowledge
there is no analytic or numerical evidence for such an `` accidental '' symmetry ( see for example @xcite for the three - body case ) , but a proof of this assumption that @xmath17 exhausts the symmetries of @xmath23 for the parameter range @xmath54 would be most welcome .
if there are no spin degrees of freedom , or only one spin component is accessible , the spin hilbert space @xmath30 is one - dimensional and the decomposition of @xmath31 into @xmath17 irreps is the complete reduction of the problem . in that case , only the irreps @xmath52 for bosons and @xmath53 for fermions are physically realizable .
if the particles have multiple accessible spin components , then there are several different ways to proceed .
one way is to reduce the spin hilbert space @xmath30 with respect to @xmath19 and then takes its direct product with the spatial hilbert space @xmath31 .
note that the total spin operator @xmath58 is invariant with respect to @xmath19 so subspaces with the same total spin and spin component will belong to an irrep of @xmath19 .
techniques for the reduction of a spin system are well - known @xcite ; an example with four spin-@xmath59 fermions is provided in table [ spintable ] .
then the total hilbert space @xmath60 can be symmetrized to account for fermions or bosons by taking the direct product of the @xmath19 irreps for the spin with the @xmath19 factor of the @xmath17 irrep for the spatial part .
the reduction of the direct product of two @xmath19 irreps will contain a single copy of @xmath52 if the irreps are the same and a single copy of @xmath53 if they are conjugate irreps .
this method is essentially a variation of the technique described in @xcite and extended in @xcite .
.this table summarizes the decomposition of the spin hilbert space @xmath61 for @xmath62 spin-@xmath59 particles into irreps of @xmath63 .
for example , this shows that there are three ways to construct a spin state with @xmath64 and @xmath65 , and they transform among themselves under particle permutations as the irrep @xmath46 . in total
, @xmath30 can either be decomposed as @xmath66 , where @xmath67 is the irrep of @xmath68 , or as @xmath69 . [
cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] | hilbert space @xmath1 particles @xmath26 spin components interaction strength @xmath10 tensor product @xmath27 @xmath28 spin hilbert space @xmath29 hamiltonian @xmath23 identity @xmath30 reduce @xmath31 energy eigenspaces @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 spectrum @xmath23 @xmath10 @xmath17 symmetry @xmath23 space @xmath31 reduced sum irreps @xmath17 labeled triplet @xmath35@xmath36 @xmath37 labels degeneracy @xmath38-type irreps three labels @xmath39 correspond three factors @xmath17 center - of - mass excitation quantum number @xmath40 labels irreps @xmath21 parity quantum number @xmath41 labels irrep parity inversion relative parity quantum number @xmath42 contribution parity center - mass excitations @xmath21 symmetry factor third factor @xmath17 group @xmath19 notation @xmath19 irreps group @xmath19 has @xmath15 elements permutations @xmath1 objects elements @xmath19 decomposed into conjugacy classes partition @xmath44 @xmath1four particles five partitions @xmath45 each conjugacy class irrep @xmath19 depicted standard young diagrams @xmath1 boxes @xmath50 dimension irrep @xmath51 number standard young tableaux diagram boxes labeled rows boxes equal or increasing number right vertical boxes increasing numbers @xmath1 irrep @xmath52 one - dimensional symmetric irrep @xmath53 one - dimensional antisymmetric other irreps multidimensional conjugate representations rows columns exchanged same dimension each element @xmath19 represented by @xmath51-dimensional matrix traces matrices characters representation elements @xmath19 same conjugacy class same character no other symmetries hamiltonian than @xmath17 parameter range @xmath54 degeneracy eigenvalue @xmath55 constrained dimension irrep @xmath17 unique correspondence between energy degeneracy subspace @xmath32 irrep @xmath56 correspondence change @xmath10 tuned within range @xmath54 energy subspace vary energy levels subspace @xmath57 cross reorder @xmath10 varied non - interacting to hard - repulsion cross @xmath10 additional symmetry of @xmath23 value interaction strengthno analytic evidence for accidental symmetry @xcite proof @xmath17 exhausts symmetries @xmath23 for parameter range @xmath54 welcome no spin freedom one spin component accessible spin hilbert space @xmath30 one - dimensional decomposition @xmath31 into @xmath17 irreps complete reduction irreps @xmath52 for bosons @xmath53 for fermions realizable multiple spin components ways to proceed reduce spin hilbert space @xmath30 @xmath19 direct product with spatial hilbert space @xmath31 total spin operator @xmath58 invariant @xmath19 subspaces same spin belong to irrep @xmath19 techniques reduction spin system known @xcite example with four spin-@xmath59 fermions total hilbert space @xmath60 symmetrized for fermions bosons direct product @xmath19 irreps with @xmath19 factor @xmath17 irrep spatial reduction product of two @xmath19 irreps single copy of @xmath52 if single @xmath53 if variation of technique @xcite table summarizes decomposition spin hilbert space @xmath61 @xmath62 spin-@xmath59 particles into irreps of @xmath63shows three ways construct spin state with @xmath64 @xmath65 transform particle permutations as irrep @xmath46 @xmath30 decomposed as @xmath66 @xmath67 irrep @xmath68 or @xmath69 cols="^ " | 0.258982 | 1,452 | 790 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,064 | based on the generalized kinetic equation for the one - particle distribution function with a small source , the transition from the kinetic to the hydrodynamic description of many - particle systems is performed .
the basic feature of this new technique to obtain the hydrodynamic limit is that the latter has been partially incorporated into the kinetic equation itself .
the hydrodynamic equations for capillary fluids are derived from the characteristic function for the local moments of the distribution function .
the fick s law appears as a consequence of the transformation law for the hydrodynamic quantities under time inversion . | the van der waals gradient theory @xcite was originally developed at the end of the 19-th century as an `` effective '' physical picture to describe the critical region .
this theory considers a local helmholtz free - energy composed of two parts .
the first one describes the homogeneous behaviour of the system , while the second part characterizes the non - homogeneous one . in addition , the first part is proportional to the fluid density @xmath0 while the second one is proportional to the square of the density gradient .
much effort has been devoted to apply the van der waals gradient theory to various fluids . at present , it can be considered as the most simple and comprehensive model in the physics of interfaces and capillarity .
the associated hydrodynamic equations can be written as @xmath1 } , \label{korteweg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath2 is a function of the density @xmath0 and of @xmath3 @xcite and @xmath4 is the current velocity .
this formulation of the van der waals theory was originally due to korteweg @xcite , who proposed a continuum mechanical model in which the cauchy stress tensor apart from the standard cauchy - poisson term contains an additional term defined as @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the unit tensor . as already mentioned by dunn and serrin @xcite , the modern terminology concerning the korteweg model refers to elastic materials of grade @xmath7 , where the particular case of @xmath8 has been well studied in recent years @xcite .
equations ( [ continuity ] ) and ( [ korteweg ] ) have been linked recently @xcite to a nonlinear schrdinger equation viewed as a particular set of hydrodynamic equations describing the so - called nonlinear madelung fluid @xcite .
this link between capillarity and the schrdinger equation can shed more light onto the so - called quantum - like approach to many - particle systems such as beams in particle accelerators and beam - plasma systems . the standard procedure in this direction is to approximate the physical systems characterized by an overall interaction with a suitable van der waals mean field theory . to avoid misunderstanding ,
it is worthwhile to note that schrdinger equation alone does not provide an entire quantum mechanical picture . it should be necessarily supplemented by a theory of quantum measurement and consequently by a proper physical interpretation of wave packets . in the quantum - like approach ,
the many - particle systems are described in an effective way as a whole .
based on the above considerations , it appears interesting and attractive to explore the possibility of a rigorous derivation from kinetic theory of the general hydrodynamic picture thus discussed .
the starting point of our analysis is the equation for the microscopic phase space density @xmath9 @xmath10 } = 0 , \label{micphspdens}\ ] ] for a system consisting of @xmath11 particles , which occupies volume @xmath12 in the configuration space . here
@xmath13 and @xmath14 are the coordinates and the canonically conjugate momenta , @xmath15 is the particle mass and @xmath16 is the microscopic force , which apart from the external force includes a part specifying the type of interaction between particles .
suppose that at some initial time @xmath17 the microscopic phase space density is known to be @xmath18 .
then , the formal solution of equation ( [ micphspdens ] ) for arbitrary time @xmath19 can be written as @xmath20 where @xmath21 is the evolution operator , specifying the hamiltonian flow .
the choice of the initial @xmath22 is based on the knowledge of the microscopic characteristics of the system . due to the extremely complex particles dynamics ,
full consistent description is not feasible .
therefore , the detailed information on the microscopic level is incomplete .
if our system is a complex one in the sense that both the external forces and the collective forces are highly nonlinear , a dynamic instability of motion is likely to occur on a characteristic time scale @xmath23 .
the only information available to an outside observer by means of a macroscopic measuring device is a coarse - grained density distribution with a smoothing function , which takes into account the dynamic instability of motion .
thus , we assume @xmath24 where for simplicity the explicit dependence on the momentum variables @xmath14 has been suppressed . to take into account the initial preparation of the system , one has to displace the initial time @xmath17 at @xmath25 and perform an average over the past history of the system
. then equation ( [ micphspdens ] ) becomes @xcite @xmath26 } \nonumber \\ % \end{equation } % % % % % \begin{equation } = { \frac { 1 } { \tau } } { \left ( { \widetilde{n}}_m - n_m \right)}. \label{micphspdensms}\end{aligned}\ ] ] since the collision time is supposed to be much smaller than the time @xmath23 , the collision integral can be dropped and the kinetic equation for the one - particle distribution function @xmath27 can be written as @xmath28 the right - hand - side of equation ( [ onepartdfsms ] ) is regarded as a `` collision integral '' , and it can be represented as @xmath29 } , \label{sdcolintgen } % \end{equation}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath30 with @xmath31 . as a first very interesting step , we consider the diffusion approximation @xmath32 } + { \frac { 1 } { 2 } } \nabla_k \nabla_l { \left [ b_{kl } { \left ( { \bf x } ; t \right ) } f \right ] } , \label{sdcolintil}\ ] ] where @xmath33 and a summation over repeated indices is implied . for hamiltonian systems the well - known relation @xmath34 holds , which gives @xmath35 for @xmath36 . in passing , it is worthwhile to mention that using the principle of maximum information entropy formulated by jaynes , it can be shown @xcite that the smoothing function @xmath37 is of the form @xmath38}. \label{sdsmoothfun}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the quantities @xmath39 are the first and the second moment of @xmath40 at the instant of time @xmath41 , provided that @xmath40 measured at the instant @xmath19 equals @xmath13 [ i.e. @xmath42 .
in addition , @xmath43 is the covariance matrix defined as @xmath44}. \label{sdcovarmat}\ ] ] the generalized kinetic equation ( [ onepartdfsms ] ) has a form analogous to the bhatnagar - gross - krook ( bgk ) equation , widely used in the kinetic theory of gases @xcite .
there is however , an important conceptual difference between the two equations . in the bgk equation
the function @xmath45 should be replaced by the equilibrium distribution function @xmath46 describing the global equilibrium and the characteristic time @xmath23 should be replaced by the corresponding relaxation time . the smoothed distribution function in equation ( [ onepartdfsms ] )
characterizes a local quasi - equilibrium state within the smallest unit cell of continuous medium , while @xmath23 is the corresponding time scale .
rather than following the standard approach in deriving the hydrodynamic picture , we introduce the characteristic function @xmath47 instead .
it is straightforward to verify that @xmath48 satisfies the following equation @xmath49 note that the local moments @xmath50 can be obtained from the characteristic function according to the relation @xmath51 where @xmath52 .
the well - known hydrodynamic quantities , such as the mass density @xmath0 , the mean velocity @xmath53 of a fluid element and the hydrodynamic stress tensor @xmath54 can be defined as @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 here , @xmath58 , implies the thermodynamic limit . defining also the deviation from the mean velocity as @xmath59 and using the evident relation @xmath60
we can represent the stress tensor @xmath61 according to the relation @xmath62 here @xmath63 is the internal stress tensor .
equation ( [ charfunceq ] ) and the one obtained after differentiating with respect to @xmath64 evaluated at @xmath65 , yield the smoluchowski equation and the equation for the momentum balance , respectively .
these can be written in the form @xmath66 } = { \frac { 1 } { 2 } } \nabla_k \nabla_l { \left ( b_{kl } \varrho \right ) } , \label{contineq}\ ] ] @xmath67 let us consider the time inversion transformation specified by @xcite @xmath68 , @xmath69 and @xmath70 .
we argue that there exists a backward velocity @xmath71 such that @xmath72 the transformed smoluchowski equation ( [ contineq ] ) can be represented according to @xmath73 } = - { \frac { 1 } { 2 } } \nabla_k \nabla_l { \left ( b_{kl } \varrho \right)}. \label{contineqb}\ ] ] summing up and subtracting equations ( [ contineq ] ) and ( [ contineqb ] ) , we obtain the continuity equation @xmath74 and the fick s law @xmath75 here @xmath76 are the current and the osmotic velocity , respectively .
it is worthwhile to mention that since the mean velocity of a fluid element is a generic function of time @xmath19 , it can be split into odd and even part .
note that from equation ( [ currentosm ] ) it follows that @xmath77 , where @xmath4 is the odd part , while @xmath78 is the even part .
equation ( [ momentbal ] ) for the balance of momentum can be written alternatively as @xmath79 after performing a time inversion in equation ( [ momentbalb ] ) , we obtain @xmath80 where @xmath81 denotes the transformed internal stress tensor after performing the time inversion . summing up the last two equations , we arrive at the sought - for equation for the current velocity @xmath82 where @xmath83 in order to find the explicit form of the internal stress tensor ( [ internstdef ] ) , we observe that the maximum entropy of the system is realized , provided the small source in the generalized kinetic equation ( [ onepartdfsms ] ) vanishes .
this condition is equivalent to the condition of detailed balance in the case , where the collision integral ( small source ) is approximated by a fokker - planck operator .
the condition of detailed balance implies that the distribution function factorizes in the form @xmath84 where @xmath85 is a normalizable function . from the above considerations
, it follows directly that @xmath86 where @xmath87 is the boltzmann constant and @xmath88 is the temperature .
+ in the simplest case , where the external force vanishes and the diffusion tensor is diagonal and isotropic , @xmath89 , we obtain @xmath90 where @xmath91 .
thus , the hydrodynamic equations describing a free capillary fluid have been recovered .
+ in the case , where an external force is applied , the korteweg stress tensor contains an additional term proportional to the drift coefficient @xmath92 . on the other hand from the principle of detailed balance
, it follows that the drift coefficient is proportional to the external force .
the physical implication of the latter is that the additional term in the korteweg stress tensor can be regarded as a coupling between the external field and the mean field of purely hydrodynamical origin .
since a detailed information about the system on the microscopic level is incomplete , one possible way to take into account its initial preparation , i. e. an eventual dynamic instability of motion that might have set in and/or other large - scale characteristics , is to introduce a suitable smoothing procedure . as a result ,
the kinetic equation providing an unified kinetic , hydrodynamic and diffusion description contains a small source and is therefore irreversible .
although the effective collision integral ( small source ) can be represented as a kramers - moyal expansion , for the purposes of the present paper it suffices to consider the right - hand - side of the generalized kinetic equation as approximated with a properly defined fokker - planck operator .
the latter form of the collision term is adopted as a starting point in the derivation of the hydrodynamic equations for capillary fluids .
+ the hydrodynamic approximation is further obtained in a standard manner from the characteristic function for the local moments of the distribution function .
an important feature of the approach is that the fick s law emerges naturally from the transformation properties of the hydrodynamic quantities under time inversion .
the osmotic velocity is uniquely specified by the first two infinitesimal moments of the smoothing function and in a sense is a measure of the irreversibility .
+ the main result of the analysis performed in this paper , the hydrodynamic equations for free capillary fluids have been derived from kinetic theory .
if an external force is present , the korteweg stress tensor has to be modified accordingly .
an additional term proportional to the drift coefficient emerges implying a coupling between the external field and the mean field of purely hydrodynamical origin . | van der waals gradient theory developed end of 19-th century effective physical picture critical region theory considers local helmholtz free - energy two parts first describes homogeneous behaviour system second non - homogeneous first part proportional to fluid density second proportional to square density gradient effort to gradient theory to various fluids most simple comprehensive model in physics of interfaces and capillarity hydrodynamic equations written as @xmath1 } ,{korteweg}\end{aligned @xmath2 function of density @xmath0 @xmath3 @xmath4 is current velocity formulation due to korteweg @xcite proposed continuum mechanical model cauchy stress tensor contains additional term @xmath5 @xmath6 is unit tensor modern terminology korteweg model refers to elastic materials of grade @xmath7 case of @xmath8 studied recent years equations ( continuity korteweg ] linked to nonlinear schrdinger equation hydrodynamic equations madelung fluid link between capillarity schrdinger equation light quantum - like approach to many - particle systems particle accelerators beam - plasma systemsstandard procedure approximate physical systems interaction with van der waals field theory schrdinger equation provide entire quantum mechanical picture supplemented by theory of quantum measurement physical interpretation of wave packets in quantum - approach many - particle systems described as whole explore rigorous derivation from kinetic theory of general hydrodynamic picture starting point analysis is equation for microscopic phase space density @xmath9 @xmath10 } = 0 {micphspdens for system @xmath11 particles volume @xmath12 in space @xmath13 @xmath14 are coordinates conjugate momenta @xmath15 particle mass @xmath16 microscopic force interaction between particles initial time microscopic phase space density @xmath18 formal solution of equation ( micphspdens for arbitrary time @xmath19 written as @xmath20 @xmath21 is evolution operator hamiltonian flow choice of initial @xmath22 based on knowledge microscopic characteristics system to complex particles dynamics full consistent description not feasible detailed information incomplete if system complex external forces collective forces nonlinear dynamic instability of motion likely on time scale @xmath23 information available outside observer macroscopic is coarse - grained density distribution with smoothing function dynamic instability of motion assume @xmath24 dependence on momentum variables @xmath14 suppressed initial preparation displace initial time @xmath17 at @xmath25 perform average over past history equation ( [ micphspdens ] becomes @xcite @xmath26\nonumber \end{equation } % %\begin{equation \frac { 1 \tau\left\widetilde{n}}_m - n_m \right{micphspdensms{aligned} collision time smaller than time @xmath23 collision integral dropped kinetic equation for one - particle distribution function @xmath27 written as @xmath28 right - hand - side of equation ( [ onepartdfsms ] `` collision integral '' represented as @xmath29{sdcolintgen{equation{aligned} @xmath30 with @xmath31 consider diffusion approximation @xmath32 } \frac { 1 } 2 }\nabla_k_l\left{sdcolintil} @xmath33 summation over repeated indices impliedhamiltonian systems relation @xmath34 holds gives @xmath35 for @xmath36 principle of maximum information entropy jaynes smoothing function @xmath37 form @xmath38} quantities @xmath39 first second moment of @xmath40 instant time @xmath41 @xmath40 measured instant @xmath19 equals @xmath13 @xmath42 @xmath43 covariance matrix @xmath44} generalized kinetic equation onepartdfsms form analogous to bhatnagar - gross - krook bgk equation kinetic theory gases conceptual difference equations bgk equation function @xmath45 replaced by equilibrium distribution function @xmath46 global equilibrium characteristic time @xmath23 replaced by relaxation time smoothed distribution function equation onepartdfsms characterizes local quasi - equilibrium state cell continuous medium @xmath23 time scale introduce characteristic function @xmath47 verify @xmath48 satisfies equation @xmath49 local moments @xmath50 obtained from characteristic function relation @xmath51 where @xmath52 hydrodynamic quantities mass density @xmath0 mean velocity @xmath53 of fluid element hydrodynamic stress tensor @xmath54 defined as @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 implies thermodynamic limit deviation from mean velocity as @xmath59 relation @xmath60 represent stress tensor @xmath61 relation @xmath62 @xmath63 is internal stress tensor equation ( [ charfunceq ] ) after differentiating @xmath64 @xmath65 yield smoluchowski equation equation for momentum balance written in form @xmath66\frac 1 2\nabla_k_l{contineq} @xmath67 consider time inversion transformation by @xcite @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 backward velocity @xmath71 @xmath72 transformed smoluchowski equation ( [ contineq ] represented @xmath73 2{contineqb} summing subtracting equations ( [ contineq contineqb continuity equation @xmath74 fick s law @xmath75 @xmath76 are current osmotic velocitymean velocity of fluid element function of time @xmath19 split into odd and even part from equation currentosm follows @xmath77 @xmath4 is odd part @xmath78 even part equation momentbal for balance of momentum written as @xmath79 time inversion momentbalb obtain @xmath80 @xmath81 transformed internal stress tensor equations equation for current velocity @xmath82 @xmath83 explicit form of internal stress tensor internstdef maximum entropy system realized small source in kinetic equation onepartdfsms vanishes condition equivalent to detailed balance collision integral small source ) approximated by fokker - planck operator balance implies distribution function factorizes in form @xmath84 @xmath85 is normalizable function @xmath86 @xmath87 is boltzmann constant @xmath88 is temperature case external force vanishes diffusion tensor diagonal isotropic @xmath89 obtain @xmath90 where @xmath91 hydrodynamic equations free capillary fluid recovered external force applied korteweg stress tensor contains additional term proportional to drift coefficient @xmath92 principle of detailed balance follows drift coefficient proportional to external force physical implication additional term in korteweg stress tensor coupling between external field and mean field hydrodynamical origin detailed information system microscopic level incomplete to initial preparation eventual dynamic instability of large - scale characteristics introduce smoothing procedure kinetic equation contains small source irreversible effective collision integral small source ) represented as kramers - moyal expansion to consider right - hand - side of generalized kinetic equation approximated with fokker - planck operator form collision term starting point in derivation of hydrodynamic equations for capillary fluids hydrodynamic approximation obtained from characteristic function for local moments of distribution function fick s law emerges from transformation properties of hydrodynamic quantities under time inversion osmotic velocity specified by first two infinitesimal moments of smoothing function measure of irreversibility hydrodynamic equations for capillary fluids derived from kinetic theory if external force present korteweg stress tensor modified additional term proportional to drift coefficient coupling between external field and mean field hydrodynamical origin | 0.436425 | 2,872 | 1,519 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,078 | pygmy resonances in light nuclei excited in electron scattering are discussed .
these collective modes will be explored in future electron - ion colliders such as elise / fair ( spokesperson : haik simon - gsi ) .
response functions for direct breakup are explored with few - body and hydrodynamical models , including the dependence upon final state interactions . | reactions with radioactive beams have attracted great experimental and theoretical interest during the last two decades @xcite .
progresses of this scientific endeavor were reported on measurements of nuclear sizes @xcite , use of secondary radioactive beams to elucidate reactions of astrophysical interest @xcite , fusion reactions with neutron - rich nuclei @xcite , tests of fundamental interactions @xcite , dependence of the equation of state of nuclear matter upon the asymmetry energy @xcite , and many other research topics . new research areas with nuclei
far from the stability line will become possible with newly proposed experimental facilities .
one of the projects at the future fair facility of the gsi laboratory / germany is the study of electron scattering off unstable nuclei in an electron - ion collider mode @xcite . a similar proposal exists for the riken laboratory facility in japan @xcite . by means of elastic electron scattering
, these facilities will become the main probe of charge distribution in unstable nuclei @xcite .
coulomb excitation has been very useful in determining the electromagnetic response in light nuclei @xcite . for neutron - rich isotopes
@xcite the resulting photo - neutron cross sections are characterized by a pronounced concentration of low - lying @xmath0 strength .
but it is well known that non - perturbative effects leading to distortion of the energy spectrum of the fragments interacting with the target ( see , e.g. ref .
@xcite ) is a problem of difficult nature .
the nuclear response probed with electrons is free from such effects .
the interpretation of the low - lying @xmath0 strength in neutron - rich nuclei engendered a debate : are these soft dipole modesjust a manifestation of the loosely - bound character of light neutron - rich nuclei , or are they the result of the excitation of a resonance ? @xcite . the electromagnetic response in light nuclei , leading to their dissociation , is related to the nuclear physics needed in several astrophysical sites @xcite .
the existence of pygmy resonances have important implications on theoretical predictions of radiative neutron capture rates in the r - process nucleosynthesis , and consequently on the calculated elemental abundance distribution in the universe @xcite .
here , @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3is the initial ( final ) angular momentum of the nucleus , @xmath4 and ( @xmath5 ) are the initial and final energy and momentum of the electron , and @xmath6 is the energy and momentum transfer in the reaction . for low energy excitations , @xmath7 , for electron energies @xmath8 mev and excitation energies @xmath9 mev . in the plane wave born approximation ( pwba ) and using the siegert s theorem , one can show that @xcite @xmath10 where @xmath11 , is the photo - nuclear cross section for the @xmath12-multipolarity , and @xmath13 .
the response function , @xmath14 is given by @xmath15 ^{2}\rho\left ( e_{\gamma}\right ) , \label{photo}\ ] ] where @xmath16 is the density of final states ( for nuclear excitations into the continuum ) with energy @xmath17 .
the geometric coefficient @xmath18 and the transition density @xmath19 will depend upon the nuclear model adopted .
one can also define a differential cross section integrated over angles so that @xmath20 and @xmath21 is the maximum electron scattering angle , which depends upon the experimental setup .
notice that the lowest limit in the above integral is @xmath22 , and not zero .
[ epa]-[epa3 ] show that under the conditions of the proposed electron - ion colliders , electron scattering will offer the same information obtained with real photons .
the reaction dynamics information is in the virtual photon spectrum , @xmath23 , while the nuclear response dynamics information is in eq .
[ photo ] .
@xmath24 is interpreted as the number of equivalent ( real ) photons incident on the nucleus per unit scattering angle @xmath25 and per unit photon energy @xmath26 for larger scattering angles the coulomb multipole matrix elements are in general larger than the electric ( @xmath12 ) multipoles , and monopole transitions become relevant @xcite .
. [ epa ] will not be valid under these conditions .
it is found that the spectrum @xmath27 increases rapidly with decreasing energies @xcite . for @xmath28 mev and excitation energies @xmath29 mev
, the spectrum yields the ratios @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
however , although @xmath32 increases with the multipolarity @xmath33 , the nuclear response decreases rapidly with @xmath33 , and @xmath0 excitations tend to dominate the cross sections . for larger electron energies the ratios @xmath34 and @xmath35 decrease rapidly .
a comparison between the @xmath0 virtual photon spectrum , @xmath36 , of 1 gev electrons with the spectrum generated by 1 gev / nucleon heavy ion projectiles was published in ref .
the virtual spectrum for the electron contains more hard photons , i.e. the spectrum decreases slower with photon energy than the heavy ion photon spectrum .
this is because , in both situations , the rate at which the spectrum decreases depends on the ratio of the projectile kinetic energy to its rest mass , @xmath37 which is much larger for the electron ( @xmath38 ) than for the heavy ion ( @xmath39 nuclear mass ) .
in a two - body model , the single - particle picture has been used previously to study coulomb excitation of halo nuclei with success @xcite .
the @xmath0 transition integral @xmath40 becomes @xmath41 , \label{isp}\ ] ] in terms of the effective range expansion of the phase shift , @xmath42 .
as shown in previous works @xcite , a peak is manifest in the response function , @xmath43 it appears centered at the energy @xcite
@xmath44 for a generic electric response of multipolarity @xmath33 . for @xmath0 excitations ,
the peak occurs at @xmath45 .
the second term inside brackets in eq . [ isp ] is a modification due to final state interactions .
it is important in many cases @xcite .
many weakly - bound nuclei , like @xmath46he or @xmath47li , require a three body treatment .
in one particular model , the bound state wavefunction in the center of mass system is written as an expansion over hyperspherical harmonics , see e.g. @xcite .
for weakly - bound systems having no bound subsystems the hyperradial functions behave asymptotically as @xcite @xmath48 as @xmath49 , where the two - nucleon separation energy is related to @xmath50 by @xmath51 .
( see also @xcite ) .
the @xmath0 transition matrix element is obtained by a sandwich of the e1 operator between @xmath52 and scattering wavefunctions .
following ref .
@xcite , but using distorted scattering states , @xmath53 where @xmath54 is the core - neutron asymptotic continuum wavefunction , assumed to be a @xmath55-wave , and @xmath56 is the neutron - neutron asymptotic continuum wavefunction , assumed to be an @xmath57-wave .
the @xmath0 strength function is proportional to the square of eq .
[ ie1 ] integrated over all momentum variables . as pointed out in ref .
@xcite , the @xmath0 three - body response function of @xmath47li can still be described by an expression similar to the two - body case , but with different factors .
explicitly , @xmath58 instead of @xmath59 , one has to use an effective @xmath60 , with @xmath61 . with this approximation ,
the peak of the strength function in the three - body case is situated at about three times higher energy than for the two - body case . in the three - body model ,
the maximum is thus predicted at @xmath62 , which fits the experimental peak position for the @xmath47li @xmath0 strength function very well @xcite .
it is thus apparent that the effect of three - body configurations is to widen and to shift the strength function @xmath63 to higher energies . as with giant dipole resonances ( gdr ) in stable nuclei
, one believes that pygmy resonances at energies close to threshold are present in halo , or neutron - rich , nuclei .
this was proposed by suzuki et al .
@xcite using the hydrodynamical model for collective vibrations .
we will use the method of myers et al .
@xcite , considering collective vibrations in nuclei as an admixture of goldhaber - teller ( gt ) and steinwedel - jensen ( sj ) modes . for light nuclei goldhaber - teller modes dominate . for spherically symmetric densities , the transition density , @xmath64 ,
can be calculated assuming a combination of sj and gt distributions @xcite
, @xmath65 where @xmath66 is the mean nuclear radius , and @xmath67 is the percent displacement of the center of mass of neutron and proton fluids in the gt ( @xmath68 ) and sj ( @xmath69 ) modes . for light , weakly - bound nuclei , it is appropriate to assume that the neutrons inside the core ( @xmath70 ) vibrate in phase with the protons .
the neutrons and protons in the core are tightly bound . calling the excess nucleons by @xmath71 the effective charge for the gt mode
is @xmath72 @xmath73 . in eq .
[ transdsjgt ] , @xmath74 is the spherical bessel function of first order , @xmath75 the percent displacement of the center of mass of the neutron and proton fluids in the sj mode , @xmath76 the hydrodynamical model can be further explored to obtain the energy and excitation strength of the collective excitations .
this can be achieved by finding the eigenvalues of the hamiltonian @xmath77 where @xmath78 is now a vector containing gt and sj contributions to the collective motion . @xmath79 and @xmath80 are the kinetic and potential energies @xmath81 matrices @xcite .
the kinetic term can be calculated from gt and sj velocity fields .
the potential term is related to the stiffness parameters of the liquid - drop model and adjusted to a best fit to the nuclear masses .
the stiffness of the system is due to the change in symmetry energy of the system as it goes out of the equilibrium position .
the last term in the hamiltonian is the rayleigh dissipation term , which is related to the fermi velocity of the nucleons @xcite and yields the width of the eigenstate . as shown by myers et al .
@xcite , the liquid drop model predicts an equal admixture of sj+gt oscillation modes for large nuclei .
the contribution of the sj oscillation mode decreases with decreasing mass number , i.e. @xmath82 as @xmath83 .
this is even more probable in the case of halo nuclei , where a special type of gt mode ( oscillations of the core against the halo nucleons ) is likely to be dominant .
for this special collective motion an approach different than those used in refs .
@xcite and @xcite has to be considered .
it is easy to make changes in the original goldhaber and teller @xcite formula to obtain the energy of the collective vibrations , yielding @xmath84 where @xmath85 and @xmath86 is the length within which the interaction between a neutron and a nucleus changes from a zero - value outside the nucleus to a high value inside , i.e. @xmath86 is the width of the nuclear surface .
@xmath87 is the energy needed to extract one neutron from the proton environment .
goldhaber and teller @xcite argued that in a heavy stable nucleus @xmath87 is not the binding energy of the nucleus , but the part of the potential energy due neutron - proton asymmetry . in the case of weakly - bound nuclei this picture changes and it is more reasonable to associate @xmath87 to the separation energy of the valence neutrons , @xmath88 .
i will use @xmath89 , with a parameter @xmath90 which is expected to be of order of one .
since for halo nuclei the product @xmath91 is proportional to @xmath92 we obtain the proportionality @xmath93 . using eq .
[ epgdr ] for @xmath47li , with @xmath94 fm , @xmath95 fm and @xmath96 mev , we get @xmath97 mev . considering that the pygmy resonance will most probably decay by particle emission
, one gets @xmath98 mev for the kinetic energy of the fragments .
this is about a factor 2 larger than what is obtained in a numerical calculation @xcite .
but it is within the right ballpark .
the hydrodynamical model is very unlikely to be an accurate model for light , loosely - bound , nuclei and is significant only in that a reasonable magnitude of the resonance energy is found . both the direct dissociation model and the hydrodynamical model yield a bump in the response function with position proportional to @xmath88 , the valence nucleon(s ) separation energy . in the direct dissociation model
the width of the response function depends on the separation energy and on the nature of the model , i.e. a two- or a three - body model . in the case of the pygmy resonance ,
this question is completely open .
the hydrodynamical model predicts @xcite for the width of the collective mode @xmath99 , where @xmath100 is the average velocity of the nucleons inside the nucleus .
this relation can be derived by assuming that the collective vibration is damped by the incoherent collisions of the nucleons with the walls of the nuclear potential well during the vibration cycles .
this approach mimics that used in the kinetic theory of gases for calculating the energy transfer of a moving piston to gas molecules in a container . using @xmath101 , where @xmath102 is the fermi velocity , with @xmath103 mev and @xmath104 fm
, one gets @xmath105 mev .
this is the typical energy width a giant dipole resonance state in a heavy nucleus .
but in the case of neutron - rich light nuclei @xmath100 is not well defined .
but the piston model is not able to describe the width of the response function properly .
microscopic models , such as those based on random phase approximation ( rpa ) calculations , are necessary to tackle this problem .
the halo nucleons have to be treated in an special way to get the response at the right energy position , and with approximately the right width .
right now , the problem remains if the experimentally observed peak in @xmath106 is due to a direct transition to the continuum , weighted by the phase space of the fragments , or if it proceeds sequentially via a soft dipole collective state . | reactions with radioactive beams attracted interest two decades progresses reported on measurements nuclear sizes use secondary radioactive beams reactions astrophysical fusion reactions with neutron - rich nuclei tests fundamental interactions dependence state nuclear matter asymmetry energy other research topics new research areas with nuclei far from stability line possible with facilities future fair facility gsi laboratory study electron scattering off unstable nuclei - ion collider mode similar proposal for riken laboratory japan electron scattering facilities probe charge distribution in unstable nuclei coulomb excitation useful electromagnetic response in light nuclei neutron - rich isotopes photo - neutron cross sections by low - lying @xmath0 strength non - perturbative effects distortion energy spectrum fragments nuclear response probed with electrons free from effects interpretation low - lying @xmath0 strength in neutron - rich nuclei debate soft dipole loosely - bound character neutron - rich nuclei or result excitation resonance ?electromagnetic response in light nuclei to dissociation related to nuclear physics astrophysical sites pygmy resonances on radiative neutron capture rates in r - process nucleosynthesis elemental abundance distribution in universe @xmath1 initial angular momentum of nucleus @xmath4 initial final energy momentum of electron @xmath6 energy momentum transfer in reaction for low energy excitations @xmath7 electron energies @xmath8 mev excitation energies @xmath9 mev plane wave approximation siegert s theorem photo - nuclear cross section for @xmath12-multipolarity @xmath13 response function by @xmath15 @xmath16 density of final states nuclear excitations with energy @xmath17 geometric coefficient @xmath18 transition density @xmath19 depend nuclear model define differential cross section over angles @xmath20 and @xmath21 maximum electron scattering angle depends experimental setup lowest limit in integral is @xmath22 not zero proposed electron - ion colliders electron scattering same information with real photonsreaction dynamics in virtual photon spectrum @xmath23 nuclear response in eq . @xmath24 number photons nucleus per unit scattering angle @xmath25 unit photon energy @xmath26 larger scattering angles coulomb multipole matrix elements larger than electric @xmath12 multipoles monopole transitions relevant under conditions spectrum @xmath27 increases with decreasing energies @xmath28 excitation energies @xmath29 mev yields ratios @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 increases with multipolarity @xmath33 nuclear response decreases with @xmath33 @xmath0 excitations dominate cross sections larger electron energies ratios @xmath34 @xmath35 decrease comparison between virtual photon spectrum @xmath36 1 gev electrons 1 gev / nucleon heavy ion projectiles published virtual spectrum electron contains more hard photons decreases slower with photon energy than heavy ion depends on projectile kinetic energy to rest mass larger for electron than heavy ion single - particle picture used coulomb excitation of halo nuclei@xmath0 transition integral @xmath40 becomes @xmath41 effective range expansion phase shift peak in response function @xmath43 centered at energy @xcite @xmath44 electric response multipolarity @xmath33 @xmath0 excitations peak at @xmath45 second term brackets modification due final state interactions important cases weakly - nuclei @xmath46he @xmath47li require three body treatment bound state wavefunction center mass system expansion over hyperspherical harmonics weakly - bound systems no subsystems hyperradial functions behave asymptotically as @xcite @xmath48 @xmath49 two - nucleon separation energy related to @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath0 transition matrix element sandwich e1 operator between @xmath52 scattering wavefunctions distorted scattering states @xmath53 @xmath54 core - neutron asymptotic continuum wavefunction @xmath56 neutron - neutron @xmath57-wave @xmath0 strength function proportional to square of eq integrated over momentum variables@xmath0 three - body response function of @xmath47li described expression similar two - different factors @xmath58 instead of @xmath59 @xmath60 with @xmath61 peak strength function three - body case three times higher energy than two - body maximum predicted at @xmath62 fits experimental peak @xmath47li strength function effect three - body configurations shift strength function @xmath63 to higher energies pygmy resonances at energies close to threshold present in halo neutron - rich nuclei proposed by suzuki et al . hydrodynamical model for collective vibrations method myers et al . collective vibrations nuclei goldhaber - teller steinwedel - jensen modes light nuclei goldhaber - teller modes dominate transition density @xmath64 calculated combination sj and gt distributions @xmath66 mean nuclear radius @xmath67 percent displacement of center of mass of neutron proton fluids in gt sj modes light weakly - bound nuclei neutrons inside core @xmath70 ) vibrate in phase with protonsneutrons protons core bound excess nucleons @xmath71 effective charge gt mode @xmath72 @xmath73 transdsjgt @xmath74 spherical bessel function first @xmath75 percent displacement center mass neutron proton fluids sj mode @xmath76 hydrodynamical model explored energy excitation strength collective excitations eigenvalues hamiltonian @xmath77 @xmath78 vector gt sj contributions collective motion @xmath79 @xmath80 kinetic potential energies @xmath81 matrices @xcite kinetic term calculated from gt sj velocity fields potential term related stiffness parameters liquid - drop model adjusted nuclear masses stiffness due change symmetry energy equilibrium position last term hamiltonian rayleigh dissipation term related to fermi velocity nucleons @xcite width eigenstate liquid drop model predicts equal sj+gt oscillation modes large nuclei contribution sj oscillation mode decreases decreasing mass number @xmath82 @xmath83 probable halo nuclei special gt mode oscillations core against halo nucleons dominant special collective motion approach different refs @xcite @xcite consideredchanges goldhaber teller @xcite formula energy collective vibrations @xmath84 @xmath85 length interaction neutron nucleus to high @xmath86 width nuclear surface @xmath87 energy extract neutron from proton environment goldhaber argued heavy stable nucleus @xmath87 not binding energy potential energy neutron - proton asymmetry weakly - bound nuclei changes reasonable associate @xmath87 to separation energy valence neutrons @xmath88 use @xmath89 parameter @xmath90 expected order one halo nuclei product @xmath91 proportional to @xmath92 obtain proportionality @xmath93 eq @xmath47li @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath96 mev get @xmath97 mev pygmy resonance decay by particle emission gets @xmath98 mev kinetic energy fragments factor 2 larger than numerical calculation @xcite within right ballpark hydrodynamical model unlikely accurate for light loosely - bound nuclei significant reasonable magnitude resonance energy direct dissociation model hydrodynamical model yield bump response function position proportional to @xmath88 valence nucleon separation energydirect dissociation model width response function depends on separation energy nature model two - body model pygmy resonance question open hydrodynamical model predicts @xcite width collective mode @xmath99 @xmath100 average velocity nucleons nucleus relation collective vibration damped by incoherent collisions nucleons with walls nuclear potential well vibration cycles approach mimics kinetic theory gases energy transfer moving piston to gas molecules container @xmath101 @xmath102 fermi velocity @xmath103 mev @xmath104 fm gets @xmath105 mev typical energy width giant dipole resonance state heavy nucleus neutron - rich light nuclei @xmath100 not defined piston model width response function microscopic models random phase approximation calculations necessary halo nucleons treated response right energy position right width problem remains if peak in @xmath106 due to direct transition to continuum weighted phase space fragments or proceeds via soft dipole collective state | 0.504238 | 3,250 | 1,615 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,081 | i describe the lattice determination of the electrical conductivity of the quark gluon plasma @xcite .
since this is the first extraction of a transport coefficient with a degree of control over errors , i next use this to make estimates of other transport related quantities using simple kinetic theory formul .
the resulting estimates are applied to fluctuations , ultra - soft photon spectra and the viscosity .
dimming of ultra - soft photons is exponential in the mean free path , and hence is a very sensitive probe of transport . . | transport coefficients have recently been computed to leading logarithmic order in weak coupling perturbation theory @xcite . however , at temeperatures of interest to heavy - ion collisions experiments , the gauge coupling @xmath0 and this computation is ineffective . at the other extreme of @xmath1 , the ads / cft correspondence has been exploited to bound the shear viscosity @xmath2 @xcite , where @xmath3 is the extropy density .
this result is for a highly supersymmetric version of qcd and needs to be corrected in order to connect with experiments .
there is clearly a case for a lattice computation , if one can have control over the process of analytic continuation from euclidean to minkowski space - time .
direct computations of the shear viscosity were tried @xcite , but were inconclusive because statistical problems beset even the euclidean computations of the correlator of the energy - momentum tensor , thus making it hard to check the analytic continuation . in this work
@xcite i shift the focus slightly and compute the electrical conductivity , @xmath4 , of the quark - gluon plasma .
this involves a lattice computation of the correlator of the electromagnetic current .
since this is no harder than the extraction of the @xmath5-meson mass , statistical errors in the euclidean computation are under control , and effort can be concentrated on the harder job of analytical continuation .
we are able to demonstrate control over this process , and thereby extract @xmath4 .
this is interesting in itself for heavy - ion collisions because several properties of soft photons in media can be inferred once @xmath4 is known .
since this is the first statistically reliable extraction of a transport coefficient from lattice qcd , one can use this to estimate many different quantities which depend on transport , and are important for heavy - ion physics . with @xmath4 in hand , and using two well - specified approximations , we are able to predict the value of @xmath6 , and compare the lattice results with others .
the lattice computations described in section 2 are from @xcite .
the material in section 3 is partly new .
all lattice computations of transport coefficients are performed in the context of linear response theory .
the response , @xmath7 , of a system to a time - dependent force @xmath8 is given , in the frequency domain by @xmath9 .
the response function @xmath10 can then be written in terms of the retarded correlation function of @xmath7 , and the transport coefficient can be extracted using kubo formul . for @xmath4 ,
the kubo formula is ( t ) = 16._i^i(,0,t)|_=0 , [ cond]where the sum is over spatial polarisations of the imaginary part of the retarded photon propagator , _
i.e. _ , the spectral density , @xmath11 , of the electromagnetic current correlator .
the usual qed ward identity gives @xmath12 , where @xmath13 is the usual charge susceptibility .
a lattice computation proceeds from the spectral representation for euclidean current correlators ( t , t ) = _ 0^ k(,t , t ) ( , t ) , [ spec]where @xmath14 is the free propagator , @xmath15 is the product of the zero ( spatial ) momentum vector correlator summed over all spatial polarisations , @xmath16 , and the em vertex factor @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is the charge of a quark of flavour @xmath19 . for later use
we note that @xmath20 for two flavours .
the main problem in this determination is that @xmath21 is needed at an infinite number of points and @xmath15 is known only at @xmath22 different values .
the solution is to constrain the function @xmath21 through an informed guess , and use a bayesian method to extract it .
we note a second complication .
a free field theory computation shows that @xmath23 increases as @xmath24 at large @xmath25 .
this means that a naive application of the kubo formul would violate causality @xcite .
we try to solve this problem by using @xmath26 which is the difference of the measured and free - field theory propagators to extract @xmath27 .
the propagator @xmath28 obtained through the fit of @xmath27 compared to the data for @xmath29 and @xmath30 ( circles ) , 10 ( squares ) and 12 ( pentagons ) with quark mass @xmath31 . ]
the propagator @xmath28 obtained through the fit of @xmath27 compared to the data for @xmath29 and @xmath30 ( circles ) , 10 ( squares ) and 12 ( pentagons ) with quark mass @xmath31 . ] using a variety of bayesian methods @xcite to extract @xmath26 we found a peak at @xmath32 @xcite and a smooth drop to zero at @xmath33 ( see figure [ fg.rho ] ) .
the checks which have been performed on this extraction are 1 .
the statistical errors are negligible , as seen in figures [ fg.rho ] and [ fg.prop ] .
the position of the peak seen in figure [ fg.rho ] is not strongly dependent on the lattice spacing , as checked by using @xmath30 , 10 and 12 .
3 . variations in the results are investigated due to algorithmic changes in the bayesian prior and the truncation and discreitzation of eq .
( [ spec ] ) .
the width of the band of systematic errors shown in figure [ fg.rho ] is thrice the width due to such variation
. it would be useful to have similiar tests of robustness on all uses of bayesian methods including the maximum entropy method ( mem ) .
the goodness of fit to the euclidean data can be judged from figure [ fg.prop ] .
we draw attention to the small error bars on this data when compared to the errors on typical measurements of euclidean correlators of energy momentum tensor .
having established the existence of the peak , further information is extracted using a parametrization of the peak in @xmath27 as the ratio of two polynomials , with that in the numerator being of lower order than the denonimator , so that the integrals used in the kramers - krnig relation converge .
the denominator has to be at least a quartic polynomial in order to smoothly connect to the weak - coupling picture of a pinch singularity giving rise to the peak along real @xmath25 @xcite .
( we note in this connection that earlier attempts to extract transport quantities have worked with the full @xmath21 rather than with @xmath27 .
this error can strongly suppress estimates of the transport coefficients . since @xmath21 increases with @xmath25 , this biases the fitted peak towards larger @xmath25 , thus decreasing the slope at the origin for any fit form with one peak . )
using these fits our estimate of the electrical conductivity is
t = [ result ]
in kinetic theory one can write the drude formula for the electrical conductivity = m , [ transport]where @xmath34 is the entropy density in quarks , @xmath35 their screening mass and @xmath36 their mean free time .
using the lattice result for @xmath4 one gets @xmath37 fm .
while charge is transported through quarks , momentum is transported mainly through gluons . due to colour factors
the mean free time for gluons is about half the mean free time for quarks .
then using a kinetic theory formula for the viscosity along with such an estimate of @xmath38 one gets s0.210.02
[ visco]only lattice errors are shown in this estimate .
errors on the kinetic theory are harder to extract .
the lattice + kinetic theory result is 2.5 times the ads / cft limit .
non - zero electrical conductivity leads to screening of photons with energy below the peak of the spectral function found earlier , , for @xmath39 mev .
this is a direct consequence of maxwell s equations .
this range of screened energies lies far below the excess which may have been seen by the cern na49 experiment .
it seems possible that direct photons at such low - energy could be distinguished from photons coming from decays of pions at rhic - ii .
one method for using an observation of photon dimming to extract the conductivity has been suggested @xcite .
the mean free path , @xmath40 , of these ultra - soft photons is given by the formula = 6 fm .
[ skin]since the fireball at rhic is about 7 fm in size , one could expect dimming by a factor of @xmath41 , , by a factor of 3.2 .
there is a self - consistency argument here involving only the data .
if the viscosity is small , then mean free times of quarks and gluons are small , and the mean free path of photons can only be about 20 ( @xmath42 ) times larger .
however , dimming is exponential in the mean free path .
for example , the mean free path as predicted in ads / cft would lead to dimming by a factor of 18.8 .
thus , the use of photon dimming to extract @xmath4 is an important cross check of values of @xmath6 extracted by other means .
the study of event - to - event fluctuations in limited rapidity bins is expected to give information on the phase diagram of qcd as well as make contact between experiments and basic lattice qcd computations .
however , fluctuations of conserved quantities in a limited region of space are expected to even out by transport processes such as diffusion .
the computation of @xmath4 is relevant not only to the diffusion of charge , but also of baryon number and isospin .
the diffusion constant can be obtained using the kinetic theory formula @xcite d=_qc_s^20.1 fm , [ einstein]where we have taken the square of the speed of sound @xmath43 at @xmath29 , as shown by recent lattice computations @xcite .
if the plasma is highly dissipative , then @xmath44 must be small .
when @xmath44 decreases , the fluctuation are more localized at the same time .
small viscosity implies smaller mean free path , and hence longer persistence of the fluctuation signal . in the approach of @xcite
this would mean that the rapidity width of a fluctuation is @xmath45 for fluctuations created at time @xmath46 fm .
when weak coupling was the only tool to investigate transport properties , it was felt that the qgp would be weakly dissipative .
now with other tools at our disposal , the question seems more open , and preliminary evidence is that dissipation is strong .
the first lattice results on transport @xcite pin down many aspects of transport , as outlined in this section , and lead to the hope that multiple experimental constraints on transport are feasible .
99 arnold p , moore g d and yaffe l g 2000 _ j. h. e. p. _ * 0011 * 001 arnold p , moore g d and yaffe l g 2001 _ j. h. e. p.
_ * 0111 * 057 kovtun p , son d t and starinets a o 2003 _ j. h. e. p. _ * 0310 * 064 karsch f and wyld h w 1987 _ phys .
_ d * 35 * 2518 nakamura a and sakai s 2005 _ phys .
lett . _ * 94 * 072305 gupta s 2004 _ phys
_ b * 597 * 57 hilgevoord j 1960 _ dispersion relations and causal description _
( amsterdam : north - holland ) aarts g and resco j m m ( 2002 ) _ j. h. e. p. _ * 0204 * 053 gupta s 2004 here s looking at you , fireball _ preprint _ hep - ph/0411355 aziz m a and gavin s 2004 _ phys .
_ c * 70 * 034905 gavai r v , gupta s and mukherjee s 2004 the speed of sound and specific heat in the qcd plasma : hydrodynamics , fluctuations and conformal symmetry _
hep - lat/0412036 | transport coefficients computed in weak coupling perturbation theory at temeperatures heavy - ion collisions experiments gauge coupling @xmath0 computation ineffective extreme @xmath1 ads / cft correspondence exploited bound shear viscosity @xmath2 @xmath3 extropy density result supersymmetric version qcd needs connect experiments case for lattice computation control over continuation euclidean to minkowski space - time direct computations shear viscosity tried inconclusive statistical problems euclidean computations energy - momentum tensor hard check analytic continuation focus electrical conductivity @xmath4 of quark - gluon plasma involves lattice computation of correlator electromagnetic current no harder extraction @xmath5-meson mass statistical errors euclidean computation under control effort concentrated on analytical continuation control process extract @xmath4 interesting for heavy - ion collisions properties of soft photons inferred once @xmath4 known first statistically reliable extraction of transport coefficient from lattice qcd estimate quantities transport important for heavy - ion physics@xmath4 two approximations predict value @xmath6 compare lattice results lattice computations section 2 from @xcite material section 3 new lattice computations transport coefficients linear response theory response @xmath7 to time - dependent force @xmath8 given @xmath9 response function @xmath10 retarded correlation function @xmath7 transport coefficient extracted kubo formul @xmath4 kubo formula ( t ) = 16._i^i(,0,t)|_=0 sum over spatial polarisations retarded photon propagator spectral density @xmath11 electromagnetic current correlator qed ward identity gives @xmath12 @xmath13 charge susceptibility lattice computation spectral representation euclidean current correlators ( t , t ) = 0^ k( @xmath14 free propagator @xmath15 product zero momentum vector correlator over spatial polarisations @xmath16 em vertex factor @xmath17 @xmath18 charge of quark flavour @xmath19 @xmath20 two flavours @xmath21 needed infinite points @xmath15 known at @xmath22 valuessolution constrain function @xmath21 through informed guess use bayesian method to extract second complication free field theory computation shows @xmath23 increases as @xmath24 at large @xmath25 naive application kubo formul violate causality @xcite solve problem using @xmath26 difference of measured free - field theory propagators to extract @xmath27 propagator @xmath28 fit @xmath27 compared to data for @xmath29 @xmath30 10 12 with quark mass @xmath31 propagator @xmath28 using bayesian methods extract @xmath26 found peak at @xmath32 @xcite smooth drop to zero at @xmath33 figure fg.rho checks performed extraction statistical errors negligible in figures position of peak not strongly dependent on lattice spacing checked using @xmath30 10 12 variations results investigated due to algorithmic changes in bayesian prior truncation discreitzation of eq width band of systematic errors in figure fg.rho thrice width due to variation useful have similiar tests of robustness on all bayesian methods including maximum entropy methodfit euclidean data judged from figure fg.prop small error bars compared euclidean correlators energy momentum tensor established existence peak information extracted parametrization peak in @xmath27 as ratio of two polynomials numerator lower order than denonimator integrals converge denominator quartic polynomial connect to weak - coupling picture pinch singularity peak along @xmath25 earlier attempts extract transport quantities worked with full @xmath21 @xmath27 error estimates transport coefficients @xmath21 increases with @xmath25 biases peak towards larger @xmath25 slope at origin for form peak estimate electrical conductivity is t = [ result ] kinetic theory drude formula electrical conductivity = m , [ transport @xmath34 entropy density quarks @xmath35 screening mass @xmath36 mean free time lattice result for @xmath4 @xmath37 fm charge transported through quarks momentum through gluons mean free time for gluons half quarks kinetic theory formula for viscosity estimate of @xmath38 s0.210.02 [ lattice errors shown errors kinetic theory harder to extractlattice + kinetic theory result 2.5 times ads / cft limit non - zero electrical conductivity screening photons energy below peak spectral function @xmath39 mev consequence maxwell s equations range screened energies below excess cern na49 experiment direct photons low - energy from decays pions at rhic - ii photon dimming extract conductivity suggested @xcite mean free path @xmath40 ultra - soft photons formula = 6 fm fireball at rhic 7 fm dimming @xmath41 3.2 self - consistency argument viscosity small mean free times quarks gluons small mean free path photons 20 ( @xmath42 ) times larger dimming exponential in mean free path mean free path dimming factor 18.8 photon dimming extract @xmath4 cross check of values @xmath6 study event - to - event fluctuations in limited rapidity bins information phase diagram qcd contact experiments lattice qcd computations fluctuations conserved quantities limited region space even out by transport processes diffusion computation @xmath4 relevant to diffusion charge baryon number isospin diffusion constant obtained using kinetic theory formula @xcite d=_qc_s^20.1 fm taken square of speed sound @xmath43 at @xmath29 shown by lattice computations plasma highly dissipative @xmath44 small @xmath44 decreases fluctuation localized small viscosity implies smaller mean free path longer persistence fluctuation signal rapidity width fluctuation @xmath45 for fluctuations @xmath46 fm weak coupling tool transport properties qgp weakly dissipative now other tools question open preliminary evidence dissipation strong first lattice results on transport @xcite pin down aspects transport lead hope experimental constraints on transport feasible arnold p moore g yaffe l g 2000 j. 0011 * 001 0111 * 057 kovtun son starinets 2003 0310 * 064 karsch f wyld h w 1987 phys . 35 * 2518 nakamura sakai s 2005 94 * 072305 gupta s 2004 597 * 57 hilgevoord j 1960 dispersion relations causal description amsterdam north - holland aarts g resco j m 20020204 053 gupta 2004 fireball preprint hep ph/0411355 aziz gavin 2004 034905 gavai gupta mukherjee 2004 speed sound heat qcd plasma hydrodynamics fluctuations conformal symmetry hep lat/0412036 | 0.435834 | 2,680 | 1,363 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,084 | we calculate the @xmath0-wave charmonium spectroscopy using the hamiltonian with the non - relativistic qcd ( nrqcd ) potential .
the logarithmic factor @xmath1 , appearing in the next - to - leading order qcd loop corrections to the potential , is expanded about @xmath2 , where @xmath3 corresponds to the typical charmonium scale .
the resulting potential characterized by the coulombic and linear components is consistent with the form of the cornell potential .
we obtain @xmath4 fitting results for the masses of the @xmath0-wave charmonium states , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 in remarkable accordance with data
. our results successfully account for the hyperfine splitting for the @xmath9 state as well as for the @xmath10 state .
we further use the three best fit parameters : the charm quark mass @xmath11 , coupling constant @xmath12 and the corresponding scale @xmath3 to predict the @xmath0-wave mass spectrum with @xmath13 .
the hints for results are discussed .
[ cols= " < " , ] | the @xmath0-wave charmonium spectroscopy has been calculated by considering the hamiltonian with the non - relativistic qcd potential . for the next - to - leading order
qcd loop corrections to the potential , we expand the logarithmic factor @xmath1 about @xmath2 , where @xmath3 corresponds to the typical charmonium scale of order @xmath14 , so that the qcd potential can be modeled as the coulomb plus linear form , which is consistent with the cornell potential . in our approach , we have performed the best @xmath4 fit by comparing the current mass data of the @xmath0-wave charmonium states , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 , with their modified pad approximants . our results , in good agreement with the data , can successfully account for the hyperfine splitting for the @xmath9 state as well as for the @xmath10 state .
the fitted parameters are @xmath15 , and @xmath16 , consistent well with the ranges that one usually used . using then these three parameters
we have further predicted the @xmath0-wave mass spectrum with @xmath13 .
2.5 cm we are grateful to c.h . chen and c.w .
kao for useful comments .
we also would like to thank n. brambilla for correspondence .
this research was supported in part by the national center for theoretical sciences and the national science council of r.o.c . under grant
nsc96 - 2112-m-033 - 004-my3 and no .
nsc99 - 2112-m-003 - 005-my3 .
the eigenenergies and corresponding eigenfunctions of the hamiltonian operator @xmath17 can be calculated by using the rayleigh - schrdinger perturbation theory .
we decompose @xmath17 into two hermitian parts , @xmath18 and the rest , @xmath19 where @xmath20\delta^3(\vec{r})\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] to solve the eigenvalue problem of @xmath17 , we instead consider the following hamiltonian function @xmath21 so that we have @xmath22 , where @xmath23 is a continuous real parameter .
[ [ the - corrections - due - to - the - spin - obit - and - tensor - interactions - in - s - wave - states - of - hamiltonian - h_c ] ] the corrections due to the spin - obit and tensor interactions in @xmath0-wave states of hamiltonian @xmath17 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ it is obviously that @xmath24 , where @xmath25 means the expectation value of the @xmath0-wave states , while @xmath26 is given by @xmath27 where @xmath28 \rangle \ , , \label{a6}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath29 being the spatial part of the wave function for the hamiltonian @xmath17 , given in eq .
( [ app : wf ] ) , which is spin - dependent but independent of @xmath30 since @xmath31 . in terms of the variables of spherical polar coordinates , @xmath32 , @xmath33 and @xmath30 : @xmath34 we have @xmath35 using the results of eqs .
( [ a1 ] ) and ( [ a5 ] ) to the angular integral in eq .
( [ a6 ] ) , we obtain @xmath36 and therefore @xmath37 since the spin - orbit and tensor interactions can be neglected for the @xmath0-wave states , following the standard approach , the eigenenergies @xmath38 of @xmath39 can be determined in terms of the perturbation expansion : @xmath40\delta^3(\vec{r})|\psi_{nlms}^{c(0 ) } \rangle \nonumber\\ & = & \int\psi^{c(0)}_{nlm}(\vec{r } ) \frac{4\pi c_f \alpha_s}{3m_c ^2}\left[s(s+1)-\frac{3}{2}\right]\delta^3(\vec{r})\psi^{c(0)}_{nlm}(\vec{r } ) r^2 \sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi \\
\biggl ( & = & \int^\infty _ 0 r^{(0)}_n(r ) \frac{4\pi c_f \alpha_s}{3m_c ^2}\left[s(s+1)-\frac{3}{2}\right](2l+1)\frac{\delta(r)}{4\pi r^2 } r^{(0)}_n(r)r^2 dr , \hskip0.3 cm { \rm for}\ m=0 \biggr)\ , , \nonumber\\ e_{nlms}^{(2)}&= & \sum_{k=1,\dots\atop k\neq n ~~}\frac{v_{nklms}v_{knlms}}{e^{(0)}_{nlms}-e^{(0)}_{klms}}\ , , \\ e_{nlms}^{(3)}&= & \sum_{k=1,\dots\atop k\neq n ~~ } \sum_{g=1,\dots\atop g\neq n ~~ } \frac{v_{nklms}v_{kglms}v_{gnlms } } { ( e^{(0)}_{nlms}-e^{(0)}_{klms})(e^{(0)}_{nlms}-e^{(0)}_{glms})}-\sum_{k=1,\dots\atop k\neq n ~~ } \frac{v_{nnlms}v_{nklms}v_{knlms}}{(e^{(0)}_{nlms}-e^{(0)}_{klms})^{2}},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath41 and @xmath42 are respectively the eigenenergies and eigenkets of @xmath43 , and @xmath44(2l+1 ) \frac{\delta(r)}{4\pi r^2 } r^{(0)}_k(r)r^2 dr , \hskip0.3 cm { \rm for}\ m=0 \biggr ) . ~~\end{aligned}\ ] ] the states @xmath42 read @xmath45 where @xmath46 } } \left(\frac{m_c\alpha r}{n b } \right)^l e^{-\frac{\alpha m_c}{2 n b}r}l^{2l+1}_{n - l-1 } \left(\frac{m_c\alpha r}{n b}\right ) . ~~\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the calculation , we introduce the transformation , called the pad approximation , to accelerate the convergence of the perturbative series of @xmath38 which are approximately presented as rational functions , @xmath47(\kappa)$ ] , @xmath48(\kappa)&= & \frac{p^c_0+p^c_1\kappa+p^c_2\kappa^2}{1+q^c_1 \kappa},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath49 and @xmath50 can be determined by the values of @xmath41 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 , and @xmath53 .
therefore , for the @xmath0-wave states , the eigenenergies of the hamiltonian @xmath17 are approximately to be @xmath54(1 ) & = & \frac{p^c_0+p^c_1+p^c_2}{1+q^c_1 } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and the corresponding wave functions are @xmath55 where up to the second order @xmath56 \equiv\sqrt{\frac{1}{4\pi}}\bar{r}_{ns}(r)\ , , \label{app : wf}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath57 g. t. bodwin , e. braaten and g. p. lepage , phys .
d * 51 * , 1125 ( 1995 ) [ erratum - ibid .
d * 55 * , 5853 ( 1997 ) ] [ arxiv : hep - ph/9407339 ] .
e. braaten , arxiv : hep - ph/9702225 .
w. e. caswell and g. p. lepage , phys .
b * 167 * , 437 ( 1986 ) .
b. a. thacker and g. p. lepage , phys .
d * 43 * , 196 ( 1991 ) .
a. pineda and j. soto , nucl .
suppl . * 64 * , 428 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9707481 ] .
e. eichten , k. gottfried , t. kinoshita , k. d. lane and t. m. yan , phys .
d * 17 * , 3090 ( 1978 ) [ erratum - ibid .
d * 21 * , 313 ( 1980 ) ] .
e. eichten , k. gottfried , t. kinoshita , k. d. lane and t. m. yan , phys .
d * 21 * , 203 ( 1980 ) .
g. s. bali , phys .
b * 460 * , 170 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9905387 ] .
g. s. bali , arxiv : hep - ph/0010032 .
d. ebert , r. n. faustov and v. o. galkin , phys .
d * 67 * , 014027 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0210381 ] .
j. zeng , j. w. van orden and w. roberts , phys .
d * 52 * , 5229 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9412269 ] .
t. barnes , s. godfrey and e. s. swanson , phys .
d * 72 * , 054026 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0505002 ] .
b. q. li and k. t. chao , phys .
d * 79 * , 094004 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0903.5506 [ hep - ph ] ] .
s. l. olsen , arxiv:0801.1153 [ hep - ex ] .
s. godfrey and s. l. olsen , ann .
nucl . part .
sci . * 58 * , 51 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0801.3867 [ hep - ph ] ] .
m. b. voloshin , prog .
phys . * 61 * , 455 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0711.4556 [ hep - ph ] ] .
c. m. bender and s. a. orszag , _ advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers : asymptotic methods and perturbation theory _ , 2nd ed . ,
springer , new york , 1999 .
a. falkowski and m. perez - victoria , jhep * 0702 * , 086 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0610326 ] .
p. masjuan and s. peris , phys .
b * 686 * , 307 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0903.0294 [ hep - ph ] ] .
s. peris , phys .
d * 74 * , 054013 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0603190 ] .
a. h. mroue , l. e. kidder and s. a. teukolsky , phys .
d * 78 * , 044004 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0805.2390 [ gr - qc ] ] .
j. t. pantaleone , s. h. h. tye and y. j. ng , phys .
d * 33 * , 777 ( 1986 ) .
n. brambilla , y. sumino and a. vairo , phys .
b * 513 * , 381 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0101305 ] .
p. chen , phys .
d * 64 * , 034509 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - lat/0006019 ] .
x. liao and t. manke , arxiv : hep - lat/0210030 . t. barnes , arxiv : hep - ph/0406327 . | @xmath0-wave charmonium spectroscopy calculated hamiltonian non - relativistic qcd potential qcd loop corrections expand logarithmic factor @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 corresponds charmonium scale @xmath14 qcd potential modeled coulomb plus linear form consistent with cornell potential performed best @xmath4 fit comparing mass data @xmath0-wave charmonium states modified pad approximants results account hyperfine splitting @xmath9 @xmath10 state fitted parameters @xmath15 @xmath16 consistent ranges predicted @xmath0-wave mass spectrum with @xmath13 . grateful to c.h . chen c.w . kao comments n. brambilla correspondence research supported national center for theoretical sciences national science council r.o.c grant nsc96 - 2112-m-033 - 004-my3 nsc99 - 2112-m-003 - 005-my3 eigenenergies eigenfunctions hamiltonian operator @xmath17 calculated rayleigh - schrdinger perturbation theory decompose @xmath17 into two parts @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20\delta^3(){aligned} solve eigenvalue problem @xmath17 consider hamiltonian function @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 continuous parameter corrections due to spin - obit tensor - interactions wave states hamiltonian corrections due spin obit tensor interactions @xmath0-wave states hamiltonian @xmath17 @xmath24 @xmath25 expectation value @xmath0-wave states @xmath26 given @xmath27 @xmath28{aligned @xmath29 spatial part wave function hamiltonian @xmath17 eq . spin - dependent independent of @xmath30 @xmath31 variables spherical polar coordinates @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath30 @xmath34 @xmath35 using results eqs . ( [ a1 ( [ a5 ] ) angular integral in eq .obtain @xmath36 @xmath37 spin - orbit tensor interactions neglected @xmath0-wave states standard approach eigenenergies @xmath38 @xmath39 determined perturbation expansion @xmath40\delta^3(\vec{r})\psi_{nlms}^{c(0 \nonumber\\\psi^{c(0)}_{nlm}(\vec{r\frac{4\pi\alpha_s}{3m_c ^2\frac{3}{2}\delta^3(\vec{r})\psi^{c(0)}_{nlm}\theta r{(0)}_n(r\frac{4\pi\alpha_s}{3m_c ^2}\frac{3}{2}\right\delta(r)}{4\pi r^2{(0)}_n(r)r^2\nonumber\\ e_{nlms}^{(2)}\sum_{k=1,\dots\frac{v_{nklms_{knlms}}{(0)}_{nlms}-e{(0)}_{klms}}_{nlms}^{(3)} \sum_{k=1,\dots\neq\sum_{g=1,\dotsg\neq \frac{v_{nklms{kglms{gnlms e^{(0)}_{nlms}-e^{(0){klms{glms\sum_{k=1\frac{v_{nnlms{nklms{knlms}}(e^{(0)}_{nlms-e^{(0)}_{klms}^{2}}{aligned @xmath41 @xmath42 eigenenergies eigenkets of @xmath43 @xmath44(2l+1 \frac{\delta(r)}{4\pi r^2 r{(0)}_k(r)r^2{aligned @xmath42 read @xmath45 @xmath46\frac{m_c\alpha r}{n b\frac{\alpha m_c}{2{2l+1}{n - l-1\frac{m_c\alpha r}{aligned calculation introduce transformation pad approximation accelerate convergence perturbative series @xmath38 rational functions @xmath47 @xmath48({p^c_0+p^c_1+p^c_2}{1+q^c_1 @xmath49 @xmath50 determined values @xmath41 @xmath0-wave states eigenenergies hamiltonian @xmath17 @xmath54(1{p^c_0+p^c_1+p^c_2}{1+q^c_1 corresponding wave functions @xmath55 second order @xmath56{1{4{r}_}(r{aligned @xmath57 bodwin braaten g p. lepage . d * 51 *, 1125 ( 1995 ) d * 55 * , 5853 ( 1997 ) arxiv hep - ph/9407339 braaten hep - ph/9702225 caswell g p. lepage phys . b * 167, 437 ( 1986 ) thacker g p. lepage phys . d * 43 * , 196 ( 1991 ) pinedasoto nucl 64 428 ( 1998 ) hep - ph/9707481 eichten gottfried d. lane yan phys . 17 3090 ( 1978 ) 21 313 ( 1980 ) eichten gottfried kinoshita d. lane yan . 21 203 ( 1980 ) bali 460 170 ( 1999 ) arxiv hep - ph/9905387 bali hep - ph/0010032 ebert faustov galkin phys . 67 014027 ( 2003 ) hep - ph/0210381 ] j. zeng w. van orden w roberts phys 52 * 5229 ( 1995 ) hep - ph/9412269 barnes godfrey swanson 72 * 054026 ( 2005 ) hep - ph/0505002 li chao . d 79 * 094004 ( 2009 ) arxiv:0903.5506 hep - ph s. l. olsen arxiv:0801.1153 godfrey s. l. olsen nucl sci 58 * 51 ( 2008 ) arxiv:0801.3867 hep - ph voloshin phys .61 455 2008 ) arxiv:0711.4556 hep - ph m bender orszag advanced mathematical methods scientists engineers asymptotic perturbation theory 2nd ed springer new york 1999 falkowski perez - victoria 0702 086 2007 hep - ph/0610326 p. masjuan s. peris 686 307 2010 ) arxiv:0903.0294 hep - ph peris 74 054013 2006 hep - ph/0603190 h. mroue l e. kidder a teukolsky phys 78 044004 2008 arxiv:0805.2390 pantaleone tye j ng 33 777 1986 ) n. brambilla sumino a. vairo phys 513 381 ( 2001 ) hep - ph/0101305 p. chen phys 64 034509 2001 hep - lat/0006019 x. liao t. manke hep - lat/0210030 t barnes hep - ph/0406327 | 0.430078 | 2,943 | 1,577 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,091 | the qcd critical point can be found in heavy ion collision experiments via the non - monotonic behavior of many fluctuation observables as a function of the collision energy .
the event - by - event fluctuations of various particle multiplicities are enhanced in those collisions that freeze out near the critical point .
higher , non - gaussian , moments of the event - by - event distributions of such observables are particularly sensitive to critical fluctuations , since their magnitude depends on the critical correlation length to a high power .
we present quantitative estimates of the contribution of critical fluctuations to the third and fourth moments of the pion and proton , as well as estimates of various measures of pion - proton correlations , all as a function of the same five non - universal parameters .
we show how to use nontrivial but parameter independent ratios among these more than a dozen fluctuation observables to discover the critical point .
we also construct ratios that , if the critical point is found , can be used to overconstrain the values of the non - universal parameters . | one of the distinctive features of the phase diagram is the critical point at which the first - order transition between hadron matter and qgp ends .
we currently do not have a systematic way of locating this point from first principles as model and lattice calculations face many challenges and much work still needs to be done in order to overcome them .
( for review , see e.g. , @xcite . ) in the meantime , if the critical point is located in a region accessible to heavy - ion collision experiments , it can be discovered experimentally in current and future experiments at rhic , bnl and sps .
it is therefore important to define and select experimental observables that will allow us to locate the critical point , if it is located in an experimentally accessible region .
upon scanning in the center of mass energy @xmath0 and thus in @xmath1 , one should then be able to locate ( or rule out the presence of ) the critical point by using observables that are sensitive to the proximity of the freeze - out point to the critical point @xcite , such as pion and proton multiplicity fluctuations .
as we vary @xmath0 , if the freeze - out point approaches the critical point , we would see an increase and then a decrease , as we move away from it , in the fluctuations in the number of these particles . in this paper
we describe how to use this non - monotonic behavior in the fluctuations of particle numbers near the critical point as a probe to determine its location .
the critical mode , @xmath2 , is the mode which develops large long wavelength fluctuations at the critical point .
its screening mass is related to the correlation length @xmath3 by @xmath4 . in the case of an infinite system , @xmath3 diverges at the critical point . in reality
, @xmath3 reaches a maximum value at the critical point but does not diverge because as it cools the system spends only a finite time in the vicinity of the critical point .
estimates of the rate of growth of @xmath3 as the collision cools past the critical point suggest that the maximal value of @xmath3 that can be reached is around @xmath5 fm @xcite , compared to the natural @xmath6 fm away from the critical point . near the critical point , the @xmath7 and @xmath8 interaction couplings are given by @xmath9 where the dimensionless couplings @xmath10 and @xmath11 are universal and they have been determined for the ising universality class @xcite . throughout this paper we shall use @xmath12 and @xmath13 as benchmark values , because these are the midpoints of the ranges of values known for these constants @xcite . the long wavelength fluctuations in the @xmath2-field manifest themselves in observable quantities in so far as they affect the fluctuations of the occupation numbers of particles that couple to the @xmath2-field , like protons and pions , which interact with @xmath2 through the effective lagrangian : @xmath14 . throughout this paper
we will use @xmath15 mev ( see ref .
@xcite ) and @xmath16 ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) as benchmark values .
it is important to bear in mind that both these parameters and @xmath17 and @xmath18 are all uncertain at the factor of 2 level .
the contribution of critical fluctuations to the 2- , 3- and 4- particle correlators due to @xmath2-exchanges is given by ( see refs .
@xcite , @xcite and @xcite ) @xmath19 @xmath20 equations ( [ eq:2corr ] ) - ( [ eq:4corr ] ) apply to both protons ( with @xmath21 ) and pions ( with @xmath22 ) .
the degeneracy factor @xmath23 is 2 for both protons and pions since the coupling to the @xmath2-field is both spin and charge `` blind '' .
the variance of the fluctuating occupation number distribution is denoted by @xmath24 and @xmath25 is the relativistic gamma - factor of the particle with a given momentum @xmath26 . in order to obtain the critical contribution to the cumulants of the particle multiplicity distributions using the correlators given above
, each momentum index needs to be integrated over using @xmath28 a cumulant with @xmath29 protons and @xmath30 pions will be denoted by @xmath31 . in order to remove the @xmath32 dependence of the cumulants we choose to normalize them as @xmath33 we can see from expressions ( [ eq:2corr ] ) - ( [ eq:4corr ] ) that higher cumulants are proportional to higher powers of @xmath3 and
thus increase by a larger factor near the critical point where @xmath3 becomes large .
in the case of free particles in the classical boltzmann regime , with no critical fluctuations , the fluctuations of any particle number obey poisson statistics .
the poisson contribution to @xmath34 and @xmath35 is 1 , and zero for the mixed cumulants @xmath36 . in reality , this 1 of poisson statistics gets few percent contributions from bose - einstein statistics , from system size fluctuations , from initial state correlations that are incompletely washed out , and from interactions other than those with the fluctuations that are enhanced near the critical point .
we are ignoring all of these non - critical corrections to the poissonian 1 .
existing data on the ratio of the fourth to second net proton cumulants , @xmath37 , at @xmath38 , 62.4 and 200 gev @xcite confirm that the non - critical corrections to the poissonian 1 are indeed small .
we now illustrate _
possible _ experimental outcomes of measurements of the cumulants , assuming that the matter produced at the freezeout point of the fireball evolution for some collision energy @xmath0 is near the critical point . to start ,
let us assume that the critical point occurs at @xmath39 mev and that @xmath40 fm .
the simplest ansatz for @xmath41 that we have found that incorporates the above physics and has roughly the correct scaling behavior from universality of critical phenomena is @xmath42^{1/3}}\ , \ ] ] with @xmath43 chosen in order to reflect the asymmetry in @xmath41 when approaching the critical point from the left ( smaller @xmath1 ) or from the right .
we shall define the width @xmath44 as the width in @xmath1 within which @xmath45 fm .
we also use our benchmark values of the four nonuniversal parameters that determine the @xmath36 for a given @xmath3 , namely @xmath46 , @xmath16 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 and we have allowed for the fact that the chemical freeze - out temperature @xmath49 decreases somewhat with increasing @xmath1 by using an empirical parametrization of heavy ion collision data from ref .
@xcite .
numerical results for some examples of normalized cumulants are shown in fig .
[ fig : om4pa ] .
we can clearly see the peak in all the normalized cumulants near the critical point .
the results indicate that the more protons are involved in the observation measure , the easier it is to identify the critical contribution .
it is readily apparent that the measurement of these observables in heavy ion collisions at a series of collision energies is very well suited to ruling out ( or discovering ) the presence of the qcd critical point .
-dependence of selected normalized cumulants .
we only include the poisson and critical contributions to the cumulants . in the left panel
we show @xmath50 and vary @xmath44 . in the right panel
we show other examples of @xmath51 s with @xmath52 mev .
see text for details .
, title="fig : " ] -dependence of selected normalized cumulants .
we only include the poisson and critical contributions to the cumulants . in the left panel
we show @xmath50 and vary @xmath44 . in the right panel
we show other examples of @xmath51 s with @xmath52 mev .
see text for details .
, title="fig : " ] in order to locate the critical point , experimental results on multiplicity cumulants will need to be compared to the theoretical predictions of the critical contribution to these cumulants .
but , recall that we had to choose benchmark values for four parameters : @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 and also use an ansatz for @xmath41 .
these parameters are not known reliably or accurately enough to permit a quantitative prediction for the effect of the critical point on any one of the cumulants we have described . in this section ,
we suppose that at some @xmath0 there is experimental data showing several of the cumulants significantly exceeding their poisson values .
we ask how ratios of cumulants can be used to extract information on @xmath3 and the values of the four parameters . and
, we construct ratios of cumulants that are independent of @xmath3 and all the parameters , allowing us to make robust predictions for the contribution of critical fluctuations to these ratios . in table
[ table : ratios ] we present the parameter dependence of various cumulant ratios ( with poisson subtracted before taking the ratios ) , where we defined @xmath55 .
@xmath58 & - & @xmath59 & -&-&@xmath60 + @xmath61 & @xmath60&2 & - & - & - + @xmath62 & @xmath63 & -&1 & - & - + @xmath64 & - & -&@xmath60&1 & - + @xmath65 & - & - & - & - & - + @xmath66 & - & - & - & - & - + @xmath67 & - & - & - & - & - + @xmath68 & - & - & - & - & - + @xmath69 & - & - & - & - & - + the correlation length @xmath3 and the four nonuniversal parameters always appear in certain combinations in the multiplicity cumulants and it turns out that we can only constrain four independent combinations .
the first four rows of table [ table : ratios ] show ratios that can be used to constrain one example of four such combinations .
the last five entries in the table show parameter - independent ratios .
they have no @xmath3-dependence , no dependence on the four poorly known parameters , and no @xmath1-dependence .
we find that these five ratios are all precisely 1 .
now let us see how we can use these five ratios in order to locate the critical point .
suppose that as you change the center of mass energy @xmath70 of the collisions , experimental evidence for peaks shown in fig .
[ fig : om4pa ] begin to emerge .
how do you check in a parameter - independent fashion whether the behavior seen in experimental data is consistent with the hypothesis that it is due to critical fluctuations ?
you first subtract the poisson contributions , and then construct the last five ratios in table i. if the fluctuations seen in this hypothetical data are in fact due to the proximity of the critical point , all five of these ratios will be equal to 1 , with no theoretical uncertainties arising from uncertainty in the values of the parameters
. this would be strong evidence indeed for the discovery of the qcd critical point .
m. a. stephanov , k. rajagopal and e. v. shuryak , phys .
lett . * 81 * , 4816 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9806219 ] .
m. a. stephanov , k. rajagopal and e. v. shuryak , phys .
d * 60 * , 114028 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9903292 ] .
b. berdnikov and k. rajagopal , phys .
d * 61 * , 105017 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9912274 ] .
d. t. son and m. a. stephanov , phys .
d * 70 * , 056001 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0401052 ] . c. nonaka and m. asakawa , phys .
c * 71 * , 044904 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : nucl - th/0410078 ] . | distinctive phase diagram is critical point transition between hadron matter and qgp ends systematic locating this point model lattice calculations face challenges work needs for review see @xcite if critical point in region accessible to heavy - ion collision experiments can be discovered experimentally in future experiments at rhic bnl sps important to define select experimental observables locate critical point scanning in center mass energy @xmath0 and @xmath1 should locate or critical point by using observables sensitive to proximity freeze - out point pion proton multiplicity fluctuations @xmath0 if freeze - out point approaches critical point increase decrease in fluctuations number particles paper non - monotonic behavior in fluctuations particle numbers near critical point to determine location critical mode , @xmath2 develops large long wavelength fluctuations at critical point screening mass related to correlation length @xmath3 by @xmath4 in infinite system @xmath3 diverges at critical point reaches maximum value at critical point diverge system spends finite time in vicinity critical pointestimates growth @xmath3 as collision cools past critical point suggest maximal value around @xmath5 fm @xcite compared to natural @xmath6 fm from critical point near critical point @xmath7 @xmath8 interaction couplings given by @xmath9 dimensionless couplings @xmath10 @xmath11 universal determined for ising universality class @xcite use @xmath12 @xmath13 as benchmark values midpoints of ranges values for constants @xcite long wavelength fluctuations in @xmath2-field affect fluctuations occupation numbers particles like protons pions interact with @xmath2 through lagrangian @xmath14 use @xmath15 @xmath16 as benchmark values parameters @xmath17 @xmath18 uncertain at factor of 2 level contribution of critical fluctuations to 2- 3- 4- particle correlators due to @xmath2-exchanges given by @xmath19 @xmath20 equations apply to both protons pions degeneracy factor @xmath23 is 2 for both protons and pions coupling to @xmath2-field spin charge blindvariance fluctuating occupation number distribution denoted by @xmath24 relativistic gamma - factor of particle with momentum @xmath26 critical contribution to cumulants each momentum index @xmath28 cumulant with @xmath29 protons pions denoted by @xmath31 remove @xmath32 dependence normalize as @xmath33 higher cumulants proportional to higher powers of @xmath3 increase near critical point where @xmath3 free particles classical boltzmann regime no critical fluctuations fluctuations particle number obey poisson statistics poisson contribution to @xmath34 @xmath35 is 1 zero for mixed cumulants @xmath36 poisson few contributions from bose - einstein statistics system size fluctuations initial state correlations interactions ignoring non - critical corrections to poissonian 1 data on fourth to second net proton cumulants @xmath37 @xmath38 62.4 200 confirm non - critical corrections to poissonian 1 small illustrate experimental outcomes of measurements cumulants assuming matter produced at freezeout point fireball evolution for collision energy @xmath0 near critical pointassume critical point at @xmath39 mev @xmath40 fm simplest ansatz for @xmath41 incorporates physics correct scaling behavior is @xmath42^{1/3}}\ @xmath43 chosen reflect asymmetry in @xmath41 approaching critical point left or right define width @xmath44 as width in @xmath1 @xmath45 fm use benchmark values of four nonuniversal parameters @xmath36 for @xmath3 @xmath46 @xmath16 @xmath47 @xmath48 chemical freeze - out temperature @xmath49 decreases with increasing @xmath1 empirical parametrization of heavy ion collision data from @xcite numerical results for normalized cumulants shown in fig . peak in normalized cumulants near critical point more protons involved easier to identify critical contribution measurement of observables in heavy ion collisions at energies ruling out presence qcd critical point -dependence of selected normalized cumulants include poisson critical contributions left panel @xmath50 @xmath44 right panel examples of @xmath51 s with @xmath52 mev text details -dependence of selected normalized cumulants include poisson critical contributionsleft panel show @xmath50 vary @xmath44 right panel examples @xmath51 @xmath52 mev see text details title="fig : " locate critical point experimental results on multiplicity cumulants compared theoretical predictions critical contribution choose benchmark values for four parameters @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath10 ansatz @xmath41 parameters not known reliably quantitative prediction effect critical point on cumulants section suppose @xmath0 experimental data showing cumulants exceeding poisson values ask ratios of cumulants used extract information on @xmath3 values four parameters construct ratios cumulants independent of @xmath3 all parameters robust predictions contribution critical fluctuations ratios table ratios ] present parameter dependence of cumulant ratios poisson subtracted before ratios defined @xmath55 .@xmath58 - @xmath59 -&-@xmath60 + @xmath61 @xmath60&2 & - - - + @xmath62 @xmath63 -&1 - - + @xmath64 - -@xmath60&1 - + @xmath65 - - - - + @xmath66 - & - - + @xmath67 - & - - + @xmath68 - - - + @xmath69 - - - correlation length @xmath3 four nonuniversal parameters appear in combinations multiplicity cumulants constrain four independent combinations first four rows table show ratios constrain four combinations last five entries show parameter - independent ratios no @xmath3-dependence four poorly known parameters @xmath1-dependence five ratios all precisely 1 five ratios locate critical point change center of mass energy @xmath70 collisions experimental evidence for peaks fig . emerge check critical fluctuations subtract poisson contributions construct last five ratios table i if fluctuations due to proximity critical point all five ratios equal to 1 no theoretical uncertainties from uncertainty values parameters strong evidence for discovery qcd critical point m. a. stephanov , k.rajagopal shuryak phys 81 4816 1998 ) hep - ph/9806219 stephanov rajagopal shuryak phys 60 114028 1999 ) hep - ph/9903292 berdnikov rajagopal phys 61 105017 ( 2000 ) hep - ph/9912274 t son stephanov d 70 056001 ( 2004 ) hep - ph/0401052 nonaka m asakawa . 71 * 044904 ( 2005 ) nucl - th/0410078 | 0.431775 | 2,754 | 1,433 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,101 | in this paper we study the annealed coupling of an ising model with 2-dimensional causal dynamical triangulation model . after a short review of previous results ,
we prove the existence of the so - called critical line and derive its analytical properties and asymptotics .
in addition , relations between the model and its dual are investigated . | the causal dynamical triangulation ( cdt ) model was first introduced in ref . as a non - perturbative theory of quantum gravity . the basic idea behind this model is to interpret the gravitational path - integral by discretizing spacetime manifolds through so - called _
causal triangulations_. thus , the problem of computing the gravitational path - integral is replaced by a statistical mechanical problem , that is the study of the partition function of an ensemble of finite random triangulations , whose weight is given by the boltzmann factor @xmath0}$ ] , where @xmath1 $ ] is the discrete einstein - hilbert action .
having described the partition function , one can study its `` thermodynamic '' limit , when the size of triangulations grows to infinity .
we refer the reader to ref . , where the subject is treated in detail .
even in two dimensions , the cdt model turns out to possess a rich mathematical structure .
in particular , it has been proved ( see refs . )
that it is critical at a certain ( known ) value @xmath2 of the cosmological constant .
this critical behaviour is reflected in the geometrical properties ( hausdorff and spectral dimensions ) of the infinite triangulations : they show 2-dimensional features at criticality , whereas in the subcritical regime they are essentially 1-dimensional .
matter is inserted in the theory by running a statistical mechanical model on the random triangulation .
technically , this can be implemented by weighting the boltzmann factor associated to each triangulation @xmath3 with the partition function of an ising model running on @xmath3 .
this is generally called _ annealed _ coupling ( see ref . for further details ) . as in the pure gravity case
, the coupled model is believed to become critical when the parameters of the model ( the cosmological constant @xmath4 and the inverse temperature @xmath5 of the spin system ) are suitably tuned .
however , the exact value of the critical parameters are still unknown and only bounds on the region where they lie have been provided ( see refs . and ) .
in this paper we review some recent results , first appeared in ref .
, on the annealed coupling between the ising model and the random causal triangulations of the plane .
in particular , we show the existence of a critical line in the positive @xmath6 quarter plane , give a description of some of its analytical properties and provide bounds on the region where the critical line is located .
furthermore , we add some new results on the relation between the critical line and its dual .
[ dm ] a _ causal triangulation _ @xmath3 is a rooted planar locally finite connected graph satisfying the following properties . 1 .
the set of vertices at graph distance @xmath7 from the root , together with the edges connecting them , form a cycle , denoted by @xmath8 and called @xmath7-th _ slice _ ( when there is only one vertex the corresponding cycle has only one edge , i.e. it is a loop ) .
2 . all faces of the graph are triangles , with the only exception of the external face .
one edge attached to the root vertex is marked , we call it _ root edge_. the last condition in the above definition is a technical requirement , needed to cancel out possible rotational symmetries around the root .
we denote by @xmath9 the set of causal triangulations with @xmath10 slices and fixed number @xmath11 of vertices on @xmath12 . in the following
, we shall denote by @xmath13 , @xmath14 and @xmath15 , the vertex set , the edge set and the triangles set of @xmath3 , respectively .
the cardinality of a set @xmath16 will be denote by @xmath17 . given a triangulation @xmath18 ,
a spin configuration @xmath19 on @xmath3 is an element of the set @xmath20 the partition function of the coupled system ( ising model and random causal triangulations ) is defined as @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the inverse temperature , @xmath23 is the cosmological constant and @xmath24 is the classical nearest - neighbour spin interaction hamiltonian .
since the set @xmath9 is countable , the series defined in ( [ z ] ) might diverge . on the other hand , for any fixed @xmath22 , each term of the series is a positive and strictly decreasing function of @xmath4 , therefore there exists a value @xmath25 , such that @xmath26 , for any @xmath27 , and @xmath28 , for any @xmath29 .
it is easy to see that the sequence @xmath25 is bounded from above .
indeed , from the inequality @xmath30 it follows that @xmath31 where the series on the right is finite ( see ref . ) for all @xmath10 and @xmath11 whenever @xmath32 .
therefore @xmath33 in the following theorem , we prove the existence of a critical value @xmath34 for each @xmath35 , above which the partition function is finite for any @xmath10 and @xmath11 .
[ te1 ] for each @xmath22 and @xmath36 , as @xmath37 @xmath38 where the limit exists and does not depend on @xmath11 .
furthermore , the function @xmath39 is non - decreasing in @xmath5 .
first we show that for each @xmath22 and @xmath36 function @xmath25 is non - decreasing in @xmath10 .
consider the partition function in ( [ z ] ) for the triangulations with a fixed last slice @xmath12 with @xmath40 vertices .
it is straightforward to derive the following bound @xmath41 hence , if @xmath42 for some @xmath11 then also @xmath43 .
this implies for any @xmath44 @xmath45 when @xmath46 this together with the uniform bound ( [ u ] ) yields existence of @xmath47 and then also by ( [ z3 ] ) for any fixed @xmath48 @xmath49 as well as @xmath50 we conclude that for any fixed @xmath40 there exists @xmath34 such that @xmath51 this proves statement ( [ t1 ] ) . to prove the monotonicity of @xmath34 consider again @xmath52 .
assume , @xmath53 then @xmath54 but for any @xmath18 and @xmath55 @xmath56 by the first griffiths inequality for ferromagnetic spin systems .
hence , @xmath57 i.e. , for any @xmath58 @xmath59 which in turn yields @xmath60 then monotonicity of @xmath34 follows from here by the statement ( [ t1 ] ) .
since the function @xmath34 is non - negative and bounded from above by a linear function ( see ( [ u ] ) ) , its monotonicity implies that it has at most a countable number of jumps .
therefore we shall call the graph of @xmath34 , @xmath22 , _ the critical line_. theorem [ te1 ] implies that @xmath61 , and therefore by a theorem of ref .
proved for @xmath62 , we immediately have the following result .
[ thm : cr_bounds ] the critical line @xmath34 is monotone non - decreasing , it has at most a countable number of jumps and it is contained in the region of the @xmath6-plane defined by @xmath63 where @xmath64 above the critical line , that is in the region @xmath65 the partition function is finite for all @xmath10 ( and @xmath11 ) .
we call this
_ subcritical region_. on the other hand , below the critical line , for each @xmath6 , @xmath66 for @xmath10 large enough . furthermore , from thm .
[ thm : cr_bounds ] it follows that the asymptotic behaviour of @xmath34 is given by @xmath67 in particular , eq .
( [ eq : crl_inf ] ) shows that the ground - state spin configurations are dominant at low temperature , as expected ( see ref . ) .
in this section we compare the partition function ( [ z ] ) , to the partition function of the system constructed by placing the ising spins on the faces of a causal triangulation , that is on the vertices of the dual graph @xmath68 of a causal triangulation @xmath3 .
hence , the partition function of the dual model is defined as @xmath69 applying a kramers - wannier duality argument , it can be shown ( see ref . ) that the partition functions of the two systems are related by the equation @xmath70 where @xmath71 and @xmath72 are such that @xmath73 equation ( [ eq : zduz ] ) implies that the subcritical region of the original model is bijectively mapped onto the subcritical region of the dual model by the transformations ( [ eq : tempdual])-([eq : cosmdual ] ) .
hence , in particular the critical lines of the two models are related by the equation @xmath74 by the relation ( [ eq : mucrdual_mucr ] ) , thm .
[ thm : cr_bounds ] implies the following
. the dual critical line @xmath75 is monotone non - decreasing , it has at most a countable number of jumps and it is contained in the region of the @xmath76-plane defined by @xmath77 where @xmath78 in particular , we have the following asymptotic results @xmath79
in this paper we presented some results on the annealed coupling of an ising model and the causal dynamical triangulation model .
we proved the existence of a critical line @xmath80 delimiting the region of the @xmath6-plane where the partition function @xmath81 of the system is finite for all @xmath10 and @xmath11 and showed that the critical line is a monotone non - decreasing function of @xmath82 and has at most a countable number of jumps .
moreover , the critical line is proved to lie in a region of the plane shrinking to a straight line when @xmath83 .
this gives in turn the exact asymptotic behaviour of the critical line and shows that ground - state spin configurations are dominant at low temperature .
in addition , we obtained exact relations between the partition functions of the model itself and its dual , as well as between their critical lines . | causal dynamical triangulation model introduced in ref . as non - perturbative theory of quantum gravity gravitational path - integral by discretizing spacetime manifolds through causal triangulations problem computing gravitational path - integral replaced by statistical mechanical problem study of partition function of finite random triangulations weight by boltzmann factor @xmath0$ @xmath1 is discrete einstein - hilbert action described partition function study thermodynamic limit when size triangulations grows to infinity refer to ref . cdt model rich mathematical structure proved critical at certain value @xmath2 of cosmological constant critical behaviour reflected in geometrical properties of infinite triangulations show 2-dimensional features at criticality in subcritical 1-dimensional matter inserted in theory by running statistical mechanical model on random triangulation by weighting boltzmann factor each triangulation @xmath3 with partition function of model on @xmath3 called _ annealed _ coupling coupled model critical when parameters ( cosmological constant @xmath4 inverse temperature @xmath5 of spin system tuned exact value of critical parameters unknown bounds on region providedpaper review recent results on annealed coupling between ising model random causal triangulations plane show critical line in positive @xmath6 quarter plane analytical properties provide bounds region add new results on relation between critical line dual causal triangulation _ @xmath3 is rooted planar locally finite connected graph properties vertices at distance @xmath7 from root edges connecting form cycle denoted by @xmath8 called @xmath7-th _ slice _ one vertex cycle has one edge loop all faces graph triangles exception external face one edge attached to root vertex marked _ root edge_ last condition technical requirement cancel rotational symmetries around root denote by @xmath9 causal triangulations with @xmath10 slices fixed @xmath11 vertices on @xmath12 denote by @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 vertex edge set triangles set of @xmath3 cardinality of set @xmath16 denote by @xmath17 triangulation @xmath18 spin configuration @xmath19 @xmath3 element set @xmath20 partition function coupled system causal triangulations defined @xmath21 @xmath22 inverse temperature @xmath23 cosmological constant @xmath24 classical nearest - neighbour spin interaction hamiltonian set @xmath9 countable series z ] might diverge fixed @xmath22 each term series positive decreasing function @xmath4 value @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 sequence @xmath25 bounded above inequality @xmath30 @xmath31 series right finite @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath32 critical value @xmath34 @xmath35 partition function finite @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath22 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 limit exists depend on @xmath11 function @xmath39 non - decreasing in @xmath5 @xmath22 @xmath36 function @xmath25 non - decreasing in @xmath10 partition function ( [ z ] ) triangulations fixed last slice @xmath12 @xmath40 verticesstraightforward derive bound @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath11 @xmath43 implies @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 uniform bound [ u ] ) yields existence @xmath47 fixed @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 conclude fixed @xmath40 exists @xmath34 @xmath51 proves statement ( [ t1 ] ) prove monotonicity @xmath34 consider @xmath52 assume @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath18 @xmath55 @xmath56 first griffiths inequality ferromagnetic spin systems @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 yields @xmath60 monotonicity @xmath34 follows statement t1 function @xmath34 non - negative bounded linear function monotonicity implies countable number jumps graph @xmath34 @xmath22 critical line_ theorem [ te1 ] implies @xmath61 theorem ref proved @xmath62 result critical line @xmath34 monotone non - decreasing countable number jumps region @xmath6-plane defined @xmath63 @xmath64 above critical line region @xmath65 partition function finite @xmath10 @xmath11 ) subcritical region_below critical line @xmath6 @xmath66 @xmath10 large from thm cr_bounds asymptotic behaviour of @xmath34 given by @xmath67 eq crl_inf shows ground - state spin configurations dominant at low temperature compare partition function ( [ z ] to system ising spins on faces causal triangulation vertices dual @xmath68 causal triangulation @xmath3 partition function dual model defined as @xmath69 kramers - wannier duality argument partition functions two systems related by equation @xmath70 @xmath71 and @xmath72 @xmath73 equation eq : zduz implies subcritical region original model mapped onto dual model by transformations ( eq : tempdual])- : cosmdual ] critical lines two models related by equation @xmath74 relation ( eq : mucrdual_mucr ] thm cr_bounds ] impliesdual critical line @xmath75 monotone non - decreasing countable jumps region @xmath76-plane defined by @xmath77 @xmath78 asymptotic results @xmath79 presented results annealed coupling ising model causal dynamical triangulation model proved critical line @xmath80 delimiting region @xmath6-plane partition function @xmath81 finite for @xmath10 @xmath11 critical line monotone non - decreasing function @xmath82 countable jumps critical line region plane shrinking to straight line @xmath83 exact asymptotic behaviour critical line ground - state spin configurations dominant at low temperature obtained relations between partition functions model dual critical lines | 0.351068 | 2,274 | 1,222 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,111 | we obtain a generalized neumann solution for the two - phase fractional lam - clapeyron - stefan problem for a semi - infinite material with constant boundary and initial conditions . in this problem ,
the two governing equations and a governing condition for the free boundary include a fractional time derivative in the caputo sense of order @xmath0 . when @xmath1 1 we recover the classical neumann solution for the two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem given through the error function .
_ 2010 mathematics subject classification : _
: 26a33 , 35r35 ; secondary : 35c05 , 35r11 , 80a22 . _
_ keywords:__ - clapeyron - stefan problem ; neumann solution ; fractional diffusion equation , caputo fractional derivative , explicit solution . | the fractional diffusion equation has been treated by a number of authors ( see @xcite ) and , among the several applications that have been studied , mainardi @xcite studied the application to the theory of linear viscoelasticity .
+ the free boundary problems for the one - dimensional heat equation are problems linked to the processes of melting and freezing which have a latent heat - type condition at the interface connecting the velocity of the free boundary and the heat flux of the temperatures in both phases .
this kind of problems have been widely studied ( see @xcite ) . in this paper
, we deal with a two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem for the time fractional diffusion equation , obtained from the standard diffusion equation by replacing the first order time - derivative by a fractional derivative of order @xmath2 in the caputo sense .
+ we use here the definition introduced by caputo in 1967 @xcite , and we will call it _ fractional derivative in the caputo sense _ , which is defined by @xmath3 where @xmath4 is the order of derivation , @xmath5 , @xmath6 is the gamma function defined by @xmath7 and @xmath8 is a differentiable function up to order @xmath9 in @xmath10 $ ] . + an interesting physical meaning of the fractional stefan problems
is discussed in @xcite and many authors were recently studying this kind of problems ( see .
some applications are linked to the behaviour in simulations of gas in polymer glasses ( @xcite ) or propagation in porous media ( @xcite ) . in @xcite
the classical lam - clapeyron - stefan problem was studied by using the fractional derivative of order @xmath11 .
+ in this paper we consider the following two - phase fractional lam - clapeyron - stefan problem @xmath12 where @xmath13 and @xmath14 , @xmath15(solid phase ) , @xmath16 ( liquid phase ) .
+ in this problem , the two governing diffusion equations ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath17 ) and ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath18 ) for @xmath19 and @xmath20 respectively , and the governing condition on the free boundary @xmath21 ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath22 ) include a fractional time derivative in the caputo sense of order @xmath0 .
the goal of this paper is to obtain an explicit solution of the free boundary problem ( [ st-2fases ] ) , called a generalized neumann solution with respect to the classical one given in @xcite , @xcite , @xcite .
this explicit solution is obtained through the wright and mainardi functions ( @xcite ) . in section
@xmath16 a summary of some properties related to these special functions are given which will be useful in the next section . in section @xmath23 the existence of a generalized neumann solution is given and an open problem for the uniqueness is posed .
moreover , the classical neumann solution for the two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem for a semi - infinite material is well recovered by considering the limit when @xmath24 .
for every @xmath25 , @xmath26 and @xmath27 the wright function is defined by @xmath28 this function will play a fundamental role in this paper .
it is known that the wright function is an entire function if @xmath26 .
+ taking @xmath29 and @xmath30 , we get @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the mainardi function ( see @xcite ) , defined by @xmath33 which is a particular case of the wright function .
+ due to the uniform convergence of the series on compact sets , we have ( see @xcite ) @xmath34 then , for @xmath35 , and taking account that @xmath36 we have @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 that is , @xmath40 where _ erf _ and _ erfc _ are the error and complementary error functions .
+ the next two propositions were proved in @xcite .
[ m pos y decrec ] if @xmath41 , then : 1 . @xmath42 is a positive and strictly decreasing positive function in @xmath43 such that @xmath44 ; 2 .
@xmath45 is a positive and strictly decreasing function in @xmath43 such that @xmath46 @xmath47 .
[ conv m al/2 cuando al tiende a 1]if @xmath35 and @xmath48 then : 1 .
@xmath49 ; 2 .
@xmath50=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi } } erf\left(\frac{x}{2}\right ) .$ ] due to the results in @xcite , the following assertions are true @xmath51 let us work on some problems in the first quadrant .
it is known that ( see @xcite ) @xmath52 is a solution for the fractional diffusion problem @xmath53 using this fact , it is easy to see that @xmath54 f_0 \ , d\xi\ ] ] is a solution for the fractional diffusion problem @xmath55 an equivalent expression of ( [ sol dfe 1er cuad ] ) is given by @xmath56 f_0 d\xi\ ] ] @xmath57\ ] ] @xmath58= f_0\left[1-w\left(-\frac{x}{\lambda t^{\frac{{\alpha}}{2}}},-\frac{{\alpha}}{2},1\right)\right].\ ] ] analogously we can check that @xmath59 is a solution for the fractional diffusion problem @xmath60
hereinafter we will call @xmath61 to the fractional derivative in the caputo sense of extreme @xmath62 , @xmath63 . + let us return to problem ( [ st-2fases ] ) . taking into account the previous section and the method developed in @xcite , the following explicit solution is obtained . an explicit solution for the two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem ( [ st-2fases ] )
is given by @xmath64 where @xmath65 is a solution to the equation @xmath66 and the function @xmath67 is defined by @xmath68 with @xmath69 the following solution is proposed @xmath70\\ u_1(x , t)=c+d\left[1-w\left(-\frac{x}{\lambda_1 t^{{\alpha}/2}},-\frac{{\alpha}}{2},1\right)\right ] \\
s(t)=\xi \lambda_1 t^{{\alpha}/2}\end{array}\right.\ ] ] where @xmath71 and @xmath72 must be determined . + according with the results in the previous section and the linearity of the fractional derivative @xmath61 , functions @xmath20 and @xmath19 are solutions of the fractional diffusion equations ( [ st-2fases]-i ) and ( [ st-2fases]-ii ) respectively .
from conditions ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath73 ) and ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath74 ) we have , @xmath75=u_0\ ] ] @xmath76=u_m.\ ] ] and therefore we obtain : @xmath77 so , @xmath78 or equivalently @xmath79 taking into account the results in proposition [ m pos y decrec ] , ( [ u2a ] ) and ( [ u2b ] ) it is easy to see that @xmath80 from conditions ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath81 ) and ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath73 ) we have , @xmath82=c+d = u_i,\ ] ] @xmath83=u_m,\ ] ] and therefore we get : @xmath84 accordingly , @xmath85 or equivalently @xmath86.\ ] ] taking into account proposition [ m pos y decrec ] , ( [ u1a ] ) and ( [ u1b ] ) we obtain @xmath87 in order to determine @xmath88 , let us work with the `` fractional lam - clapeyronn - stefan condition '' ( [ st-2fases]-@xmath22 ) . from ( [ w ] ) and ( [ derivada de w ] ) we have @xmath89 which evaluated on @xmath90 , gives @xmath91 taking into account that ( @xcite ) @xmath92 it results that @xmath93 replacing ( [ cond st 1 ] ) and ( [ d^al s ] ) in the fractional condition ( [ st-2fases]-iii ) , we get for the unknown coefficient @xmath94 the following equation : @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 that is , the equation ( [ eq xi ] ) holds , where @xmath100 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 where defined in ( [ f ] ) and ( [ f1 y f2 ] ) respectively .
+ in order to guarantee the existence of a solution of the equation ( [ eq xi ] ) , we will study the behavior of the functions @xmath100 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 . from proposition [ m pos
y decrec ] and ( [ lim w(-x ,- al/2,1)=0 y m=0 ] ) , it results that @xmath103 and @xmath104 let us prove that @xmath105 in @xcite the asymptotic expansion for @xmath106 of the wright function was studied , and an interesting summary of these results can be founded in @xcite , from where we can say that if @xmath48 we have @xmath107 , \quad a_0=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi(1-{\alpha}/2)}}\ ] ] therefore @xmath108 where @xmath109 and @xmath110 .
+ on the other hand @xmath111 , \ ] ] therefore @xmath112 where @xmath113 .
+ from ( [ comp asint m ] ) and ( [ comp asint w ] ) , we have @xmath114 and then ( [ f_2(+infty)=+infty ] ) holds .
+ now , from proposition [ m pos y decrec ] and properties ( [ caract f_2 ] ) and ( [ f_2(+infty)=+infty ] ) , we can ensure that @xmath115 therefore , there exists at least one @xmath88 which is solution of the equation ( [ eq xi ] ) .
finally , we are able to state that ( [ sol st-2f ] ) is a solution to the free boundary problem ( [ st-2fases ] )
. we will denote ( [ sol st-2f])-([eq xi ] ) as the generalized neumann solution of the two - phase fractional lam - clapeyron - stefan problem ( [ st-2fases ] ) .
the limit when @xmath24 of the generalized neumann solution ( [ sol st-2f])-([eq xi ] ) is the classical neumann solution for the two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem .
we denote @xmath116 , @xmath117 and @xmath118 as the functions defined in ( [ sol st-2f ] ) , and @xmath119 the solution of the equation ( [ eq xi ] ) for each @xmath120 .
now , we analyze the convergence of ( [ sol st-2f ] ) when @xmath24 .
applying proposition [ conv m al/2 cuando al tiende a 1 ] we obtain @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath123 where @xmath124 is a solution to the equation @xmath125 the expressions ( [ conv 1])-([conv 4 ] ) give us the classical neumann solution , given in @xcite , for the two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem defined by the following equations , and constant boundary and initial conditions : @xmath126 it is an open problem to prove that @xmath102 is an increasing function , which is a sufficient condition to could ensure the uniqueness of the solution to equation ( [ eq xi ] ) . by using maple
we show below some graphs for different values of @xmath120 , from which it can be seen that @xmath102 is an increasing function on @xmath43 .
by using the wright and mainardi functions and the fractional error function @xmath127 , a generalized neumann solution for the two - phase fractional lam - clapeyron - stefan problem is obtained for each @xmath120 . moreover
, the classical neumann solution is recovered through the limit when @xmath24 .
caputo , m. , linear model of dissipation whose q is almost frequency independent - ii , _ geophys .
j. r. astr .
* 13 * ( 1967 ) , 529 - 539 .
carslaw , h.s . , &
jaeger j.c . , _ conduction of heat in solids _ , clarendon press , oxford ( 1959 ) .
fellah , m. , fellah , z. e. a. , mitri , f. g. , & ogam , e. , transient ultrasound propagation in porous media using biot theory and fractional calculus : application to human cancellous bone , _ j. acoust .
* 133 * no 4 ( 2013 ) , 1867 - 1881 .
kholpanov , l. p. , zaklev , s. e. , & fedotov , v. a. , neumann - lam - clapeyron - stefan problem and its solution using fractional differential - integral calculus , _ theoretical fpundations of chemical engineering _ * 37 * , no 2 ( 2003 ) , 113 - 121 .
luchko , y. , some uniqueness and existence results for the initial - boundary - value problems for the generalized time - fractional diffusion equation , _ computer and mathematics with applications _ * 59 * , ( 2010 ) , 1766 - 1772 .
mainardi , f. , mura , a. , & pagnini , g. , the m - wright function in time - fractional diffusion processes : a tutorial survey , _ international journal of differential equations _ , vol .
2010 , article i d 104505 , 29 pages .
tarzia , d.a . , a bibliography on moving - free boundary problems for the heat diffusion equation .
the stefan and related problems , _ mat - serie a _ * 2 * ( 2000 ) , 1 - 297 .
available from : http://web.austral.edu.ar / descargas / facultad - cienciasempresariales / mat / tarzia - mat - seriea-2(2000).pdf tarzia , d.a .
, _ explicit and approximated solutions for heat and mass transfer problems with a moving interface _ , chapter 20 , in advanced topics in mass transfer , mohamed el - amin ( ed . ) ,
intech open access publisher , rijeka ( 2011 ) , 439 - 484 .
available from : http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/explicit-and-approximated-solutions-for-heat-and-mass-transfer-problems-with-a-moving-interface | fractional diffusion equation treated by authors @xcite mainardi studied application to theory of linear viscoelasticity free boundary problems for one - dimensional heat equation linked to melting freezing latent heat - type condition connecting velocity heat flux temperatures problems widely studied paper with two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem for time fractional diffusion equation by replacing first order time - derivative by fractional derivative of order @xmath2 definition introduced by caputo in 1967 fractional derivative in caputo sense defined by @xmath3 @xmath4 order of derivation gamma function @xmath8 differentiable function up to @xmath9 @xmath10 physical meaning of fractional stefan problems discussed in @xcite authors applications linked to behaviour in simulations of gas in polymer glasses propagation in porous media classical lam - clapeyron - stefan problem studied by using fractional derivative of order @xmath11 paper consider two - phase fractional lam - clapeyron - stefan problem @xmath12 liquid phaseproblem two diffusion equations st-2fases-@xmath17@xmath18 ) for @xmath19 @xmath20 condition free boundary @xmath21-@xmath22 ) include fractional time derivative in caputo sense order @xmath0 goal paper obtain explicit solution free boundary problem generalized neumann solution classical one @xcite solution obtained through wright mainardi functions section @xmath16 summary properties special functions next section section @xmath23 generalized neumann solution open problem for uniqueness classical neumann solution for two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem semi - infinite material recovered by considering limit @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath27 wright function defined by @xmath28 fundamental role in paper wright function entire function if @xmath26 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 is mainardi function defined by @xmath33 particular case wright function uniform convergence series on compact sets @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 _ erf _ and erfc _ are error complementary error functions next two propositions proved in @xcite pos decrec @xmath41 1 @xmath42 positive decreasing function @xmath43 @xmath44 2 @xmath45 positive decreasing function @xmath43 @xmath46 @xmath47 conv al/2 1 @xmath35 @xmath48 1 . @xmath49 2 @xmath50=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi } erf\left(\frac{x}{2}\right ) results @xcite assertions true @xmath51 work problems first quadrant @xmath52 solution fractional diffusion problem @xmath53 @xmath54 f_0 d\xi\ solution fractional diffusion problem @xmath55 equivalent expression sol @xmath56 f_0 d\xi\ @xmath57 @xmath58= f_0\left[1-w\left(-\frac{x}{\lambda t{\frac{{\alpha}}{2}}}\alpha}}{2},1\right)] @xmath59 solution fractional diffusion problem @xmath60 call @xmath61 fractional derivative extreme @xmath62 @xmath63 return to problem st-2fases previous section method @xcite explicit solution obtainedsolution two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem st-2fases by @xmath64 @xmath65 solution equation @xmath66 function @xmath67 defined by @xmath68 @xmath69 solution proposed @xmath70\\ u_1(x t)=c+d\left[1-w\left(-\frac{x}\lambda_1 t\alpha}/2}}},1\right s(t)=\xi \lambda_1 t^{{\alpha}/2}\end{array}\right. @xmath71 @xmath72 determined results previous section linearity fractional derivative @xmath61 functions @xmath20 @xmath19 solutions diffusion equations st-2fases]-i ) st-2fases]-ii ) conditions@xmath73 @xmath75=u_0\ @xmath76=u_m.\ obtain @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 results proposition [ u2a ] u2b ] ) @xmath80 conditions @xmath82=c+d = u_i,\ @xmath83=u_m,\ get @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86.proposition m pos y decrec u1a u1b obtain @xmath87 determine @xmath88 work fractional lam - clapeyronn - stefan condition st-2fases]-@xmath22 [ w ] derivada de w @xmath89 evaluated @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 replacing cond st 1 d^al s ] condition st-2fases]-iii unknown coefficient @xmath94 equation @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 equation [ eq xi ] ) holds @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 defined [ f ] [ f1 y f2 ] ) guarantee solution equation study behavior functions @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 proposition [ m pos y decrec lim w(-x al/2,1)=0 y m=0 @xmath103 @xmath104 prove @xmath105 asymptotic expansion @xmath106 wright function studied summary results @xcite @xmath48 @xmath107 a_0=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi(1-\alpha}/2)}} @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath110@xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath113 comp asint m comp asint w @xmath114 [ f_2(+infty)=+infty ] holds proposition [ m pos y decrec properties caract f_2 f_2(+infty)=+infty @xmath115 @xmath88 solution equation [ eq xi ] [ sol st-2f ] solution free boundary problem st-2fases sol st-2f])-([eq xi ] generalized neumann solution two - phase fractional lam - clapeyron - stefan problem @xmath24 generalized neumann solution sol st-2f])-([eq xi classical neumann solution two - phase lam clapeyron stefan problem @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 functions defined [ sol st-2f ] @xmath119 solution equation [ eq xi ] @xmath120 analyze convergence [ sol st-2f ] @xmath24 proposition conv obtain @xmath121 @xmath124 solution equation @xmath125 expressions conv 1])-[conv 4 ] ) classical neumann solution @xcite two - phase lam - clapeyron - stefan problem defined equations constant boundary initial conditions @xmath126 open problem prove @xmath102 increasing function sufficient condition uniqueness solution equation maple values @xmath120 @xmath102 increasing function @xmath43 wright mainardi functions fractional error function @xmath127 generalized neumann solution two - phase fractional lam - clapeyron - stefan problem obtained each @xmath120 classical neumann solution recovered limit @xmath24 caputo linear model dissipation q frequency independent geophys . astr. 13 1967 ) 529 - 539 carslaw jaeger conduction heat solids clarendon press oxford 1959 ) fellah mitri ogam transient ultrasound propagation porous media biot theory fractional calculus application human cancellous bone j acoust . 133 no 4 ( 2013 ) 1867 - 1881 kholpanov zaklevfedotov v neumann - lam - clapeyron - stefan problem solution fractional differential integral calculus chemical engineering 37 2 2003 ) 113 - 121 luchko uniqueness results initial - - value problems time - fractional diffusion equation computer mathematics 59 2010 ) 1766 - 1772 mainardi mura pagnini m - wright function time - diffusion processes tutorial survey international journal differential equations 2010 article 104505 29 pages tarzia d bibliography moving - free boundary problems heat diffusion equation stefan related problems mat - serie a 2000 ) 1 - 297 .austral.edu.ar tarzia - seriea-2(2000).pdf tarzia solutions heat mass transfer problems moving interface chapter 20 advanced topics mass transfer mohamed el - amin intech open access publisher rijeka 2011 ) 439 - 484-solutions-heat-mass-transfer-problems-moving-interface | 0.500583 | 3,409 | 1,829 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,113 | the clock synchronization problem is to determine the time difference @xmath0 between two spatially separated parties .
we improve on i. chuang s quantum clock synchronization algorithm and show that it is possible to obtain @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits of accuracy while communicating only one qubit in one direction and using an @xmath2 frequency range .
we also prove a quantum lower bound of @xmath3 for the product of the transmitted qubits and the range of frequencies , thus showing that our algorithm is optimal . | clock synchronization is a well studied problem with many practical and scientific applications . in the special theory of relativity
there are two standard methods for synchronizing a pair of spatially separated clocks , einstein synchronization @xcite and eddington s slow clock transport @xcite .
recently , two new quantum protocols have been proposed for synchronizing remote clocks .
the first one uses prior quantum bit entanglement between the two parties and was proposed by _
jozsa et al _ @xcite .
this protocol is based on the assumption that the entanglement can be achieved without any relative phase error .
however , the validity of this assumption has been discussed and questioned in a number of papers @xcite . once and if this entanglement can be obtained , their algorithm determines the time difference @xmath0 between the clocks by essentially monitoring the oscillation of a function @xmath4 , and thus requires @xmath5 shared singlets .
the second protocol was proposed by _
i. chuang _
@xcite , and obtains @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits of accuracy by communicating only @xmath6 qubits and using an @xmath2 range of frequencies . after communicating the bits according to his protocol , they are in the state corresponding to the fourier transform ( over @xmath7 ) of the state @xmath8 , for some fixed and known @xmath9 . as a result , one can apply an inverse fourier transform and subsequently measure the value of @xmath10 and hence @xmath0 . in this paper
, we improve significantly on chuang s result by presenting an algorithm that is able to calculate @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits of accuracy while communicating only one qubit in one direction and using an @xmath2 range of frequencies .
further , we prove that , under our computational model , the product of the frequency range and the number of transmitted qubits must be @xmath3 , and conclude that our algorithm is optimal in this model .
in our protocol alice sends a photon @xmath11 to bob with some tick rate @xmath9 .
the state of the received photon is @xmath12 , where @xmath13 is the time the photon spent in transit and @xmath14 is the pauli matrix @xmath15}.\ ] ] even though we only use one - way communication from alice to bob , for the purposes of proving computational lower bounds we assume an even stronger model , where the two parties can exchange photons back and forth .
the information they get about the time difference @xmath0 between the two clocks comes from a phase change in the state of the qubit , which depends on @xmath0 and the tick rate @xmath9 .
let s now define this procedure and see how we can actually implement it .
the input to this procedure will be a quantum register which holds the tick rate @xmath16 and a qubit @xmath11 .
the output is a state that has a phase which depends on @xmath0 and @xmath16 .
let tqh be a black box quantum procedure defined by the equation @xmath17 where @xmath0 is the time difference between the two parties and @xmath18 is a known base tick rate .
this is a very reasonable and powerful model , since we know that all the information one can get about the time difference via such photon communications is in the form of a relative phase change . here
the first register handles the tick rate of the photon to be transmitted and the second register is the photon that alice communicates to bob ( or bob to alice ) .
the implementation of this black box is based on the ticking qubit handshake protocol ( tqh ) described in i. chuang s paper @xcite .
suppose alice wants to create the state @xmath19 .
she first sends the qubit @xmath11 to bob with ticking rate @xmath20 . along a classical channel
she also tells him her time @xmath21 at the moment of the quantum communication .
bob receives at time @xmath22 ( according to bob s clock ) a quantum state @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is the time the qubit spent in transit .
finally , bob applies a phase change @xmath25 and thus the final state of the qubit is @xmath26 .
we are going to describe a protocol for synchronizing two remote clocks by communicating one photon . in this algorithm , alice starts by preparing a register @xmath27 of @xmath1 qubits in a certain superposition . then she sends a photon to bob with the superposition of tick rates specified in @xmath27 .
bob measures the received photon and alice obtains @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits of accuracy by processing a phase estimation on @xmath27 . in more detail , 1 .
alice starts with a register of @xmath1 qubits initialized to @xmath28 , and after applying a fourier transform to them she obtains @xmath29 she also prepares a photon with polarization state @xmath30 .
alice now transmits the prepared photon with the tick rate described by her first register .
if the photon had a definite tick rate @xmath16 and polarization state @xmath11 the final state would be @xmath31 . since the register described in step 1 is in a superposition of tick rates , the outcome will be in a superposition of states @xmath32 3 .
bob measures the received photon .
assuming without loss of generality that the outcome is @xmath28 , alice s register @xmath27 becomes @xmath33 4 .
alice then applies an inverse fourier transform , obtaining the state @xmath34 in @xmath27 .
it is easy to see that this algorithm is an application of the general procedure known as _ phase estimation_. in this procedure , we assume a unitary operator @xmath35 with an eigenvector @xmath36 and eigenvalue @xmath37 .
the goal is to estimate @xmath38 to @xmath1 bits of accuracy . to perform the estimation we start with two registers , the first one in a uniform superposition over all states in @xmath7 and the second one in the state @xmath36 .
then we apply the unitary operation @xmath35 to the second register @xmath39 times , where @xmath40 is the content of the first register . by analyzing the performance of this procedure
it can be seen that our algorithm obtains @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits of accuracy with constant probability @xmath41 .
we can boost the probability of success to @xmath42 by increasing the size of the first register to @xmath43 .
further analysis can be found in @xcite , page 221 .
in this section we will prove a lower bound on the product of the range of tick rates ( frequencies ) we use and the number of qubits we communicate .
if a quantum algorithm in the tqh model makes only queries to the black box with a single tick rate @xmath9 , then it must make a total number of @xmath3 queries in order to obtain @xmath0 to @xmath1 digits of accuracy . by making a query to the black box ,
the input @xmath48 will become @xmath49 ; after applying a hadamard transform we obtain the quantum state @xmath50 from this we see that the problem of determining @xmath0 is equivalent to estimating the amplitude of @xmath28 ( or @xmath51 ) . the problem of estimating the amplitude of a quantum state , which is equivalent to the problem of counting the number of solutions to a quantum problem , is well - studied @xcite . in @xcite
they prove that @xmath52 queries are required for a @xmath53-approximate count , where @xmath13 is the number of solutions , @xmath54 is the set of possible inputs and @xmath53 defines the closeness of the approximation .
if we use this lower bound for the case of amplitude estimation , we get a lower bound of @xmath55 , since the amplitude is @xmath56 . in our case , @xmath57 can take any value in @xmath58 , @xmath53 must be less than @xmath59 and @xmath60 , so we obtain the lower bound of @xmath3 qubits .
+ suppose we are able to query the black box with frequencies in the range @xmath61 $ ] .
we claim that this black box can be simulated by a black box with only one tick rate @xmath9 at the cost of replacing each query with at most @xmath45 queries .
this can be done since one query to the @xmath61 $ ] black box with tick rate @xmath62 is equivalent to @xmath16 consecutive queries with tick rate @xmath9 , using the output of one query as the input to the next .
notice that a superposition of queries to the @xmath61 $ ] black box does not pose any challenge to the simulation , since we can also query the one - tick rate black box in a superposition of times .
for such an input , the number of queries is defined to be the maximum over all states of the superpositions . since in all cases
we query the black box at most @xmath45 times , this means that the one - tick rate version will run with at most @xmath63 queries . now , in lemma 1 we have already proved that when we use only one tick rate , we need to communicate at least @xmath3 qubits , and therefore @xmath64 . | clock synchronization studied problem applications special theory relativity two standard methods synchronizing separated clocks einstein synchronization eddington s slow clock transport two new quantum protocols proposed for synchronizing remote clocks first uses quantum bit entanglement proposed by jozsa et al _ @xcite entanglement achieved without relative phase error validity discussed questioned entanglement obtained algorithm determines time difference clocks monitoring oscillation function @xmath4 requires @xmath5 shared singlets second protocol proposed by i. chuang _ @xcite obtains @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits accuracy by communicating @xmath6 qubits using @xmath2 range of frequencies bits in state to fourier transform state @xmath8 fixed @xmath9 apply inverse fourier transform measure value of @xmath10 and @xmath0 chuang s result algorithm @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits accuracy communicating one qubit one direction using @xmath2 range of frequencies prove under computational model product of frequency range number of transmitted qubits must be @xmath3 conclude algorithm optimalalice sends photon @xmath11 to bob tick rate @xmath9 state received photon is @xmath12 @xmath13 is time spent in transit @xmath14 pauli matrix @xmath15 one - way communication from alice to bob proving computational lower bounds assume stronger model two parties exchange photons information time difference @xmath0 clocks from phase change state qubit depends on @xmath0 tick rate @xmath9 define procedure input quantum register tick rate @xmath16 qubit @xmath11 output is state phase depends on @xmath0 and @xmath16 black box quantum procedure defined by equation @xmath17 @xmath0 is time difference parties @xmath18 known base tick rate reasonable powerful model information time difference relative phase change first register handles tick rate photon second register photon alice communicates to bob bob implementation black box based on ticking qubit handshake protocol i. chuang s paper @xcite alice create state @xmath19 sends qubit @xmath11 to bob ticking rate @xmath20 tells her time @xmath21 moment quantum communicationbob receives @xmath22 quantum state @xmath23 @xmath24 time qubit spent transit bob applies phase change @xmath25 final state qubit @xmath26 protocol synchronizing two remote clocks communicating one photon alice register @xmath27 @xmath1 qubits superposition sends photon to bob tick rates @xmath27 bob measures photon alice obtains @xmath0 to @xmath1 bits accuracy phase estimation @xmath27 alice starts register @xmath1 qubits initialized @xmath28 fourier transform obtains @xmath29 prepares photon polarization state @xmath30 transmits prepared photon tick rate register photon definite tick rate @xmath16 polarization state @xmath11 final state @xmath31 superposition tick rates outcome superposition states @xmath32 bob measures received photon outcome @xmath28 alice s register @xmath27 becomes @xmath33 applies inverse fourier transform state @xmath34 in @xmath27 algorithm application phase estimation_ unitary operator @xmath35 eigenvector @xmath36 eigenvalue @xmath37 goal estimate @xmath38 to @xmath1 bits accuracyestimation start two registers first uniform superposition states @xmath7 second @xmath36 apply unitary operation @xmath35 to second register @xmath39 times @xmath40 content first register algorithm obtains @xmath0 to @xmath1 accuracy constant probability @xmath41 boost probability success to @xmath42 increasing size first register to @xmath43 analysis in @xcite page 221 prove lower bound product range tick rates number qubits quantum algorithm makes queries black box single tick rate @xmath9 must @xmath3 queries obtain @xmath0 to @xmath1 digits accuracy query black box input @xmath48 @xmath49 hadamard transform obtain quantum state @xmath50 problem determining @xmath0 equivalent to estimating amplitude of @xmath28 ( or @xmath51 ) estimating amplitude quantum state equivalent counting number solutions quantum problem studied @xcite @xmath52 queries required for @xmath53-approximate count @xmath13 number of solutions @xmath54 set possible inputs @xmath53 defines closeness approximation lower bound amplitude estimation get lower bound @xmath55 amplitude is @xmath56 @xmath57 take value @xmath58 @xmath53 less than @xmath59 @xmath60 obtain lower bound of @xmath3 qubits query black box with frequencies @xmath61 $ ] simulated by one tick rate @xmath9 replacing each query with most @xmath45 queries one query to @xmath61 $ box with tick rate @xmath62 equivalent to @xmath16 consecutive queries with tick rate @xmath9 output input next superposition of queries to @xmath61 $ box challenge simulation query one - tick rate black box number of queries maximum over all states superpositions query black box at most @xmath45 times one - tick rate version run with most @xmath63 queries proved one tick rate need communicate at least @xmath3 qubits @xmath64 | 0.315243 | 2,042 | 1,082 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,115 | we find 3-brane higgs and coulomb phases in the 5d abelian higgs model and determine the transition surfaces that separate them from the usual bulk phases . | anisotropy has been shown to be a relevant perturbation for gauge theories@xcite .
the coupling to fermions allows us to put chiral fermions on the lattice in either the overlap or the domain wall variants@xcite .
the continuum limit may be taken , since a new phase of `` layers '' , or 3-branes , appears@xcite and the transition from this phase to the 5d confining phase turns out to be second order@xcite . in the past year
we have studied what happens , when scalar fields are included @xcite .
we have found that an additional `` layered '' phase appears .
it consists of a stack of 3-branes , one lattice spacing apart , that are in the higgs phase and the fields are confined on each layer .
the phase diagram comprises thus of five phases , three bulk and two layered : a confining phase ( @xmath0 ) , a bulk higgs phase ( @xmath1 ) a bulk coulomb phase ( @xmath2 ) , a layered coulomb phase ( @xmath3 ) and a layered higgs phase ( @xmath4 ) .
we obtained the phase diagram by monte carlo simulations and mean field theory calculations . indeed the phase of `` layers '' is found also as a solution of the mean field ( i.e. classical ) equations of motion .
we use the standard , compact , abelian higgs action , with provision made for different couplings along a single ( @xmath5 ) direction from the other four .
@xmath6\\ + \beta_{h}^{\prime } \sum _ { x } { \rm re } [ \varphi^{*}(x)\varphi ( x ) - \varphi^{*}(x)u_{\hat 5}(x ) \varphi ( x+\hat 5)]\\ + \sum _ { x}[(1 - 2\beta_{r}-4 \beta_{h}- \beta_{h}^{\prime})\varphi^{*}(x)\varphi ( x)\\ + \beta_{r}(\varphi ^*(x)\varphi ( x))^2]\\ \end{array } \label{compactaction}\ ] ] the order parameters we will use are the expectation values of the plaquette in the bulk @xmath7 and the plaquette in the transverse direction , @xmath8 defined by @xmath9 and the susceptibility of the link in the bulk @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the phase of the higgs field , @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
the phase diagram of the 5d , anisotropic , compact @xmath14 theory is , displayed , for reference purposes , in fig .
[ u1phasediag]@xcite . including the higgs adds two more dimensions .
we fix @xmath15 and @xmath16 and vary @xmath17 and @xmath18 . for @xmath19 (
weak 4d gauge coupling)@xcite we find the following `` snapshot '' cf .
[ u1higgsphasediagw ] , while for @xmath20 ( strong 4d gauge coupling)@xcite we find the snapshot in fig .
[ u1higgsphasediags ] .
as expected , at strong coupling the @xmath3 phase is no longer there . for generic values of the higgs parameters , @xmath17 and @xmath21we
find that the phase transitions are 1st order : we display typical hysteresis loops for the `` bulk '' and `` transverse '' plaquettes , @xmath7 and @xmath8 in figs .
[ plaquettes ] for the transitions from the bulk confining phase @xmath0 to the higgs phases @xmath4 and @xmath1 .
however , we also find hints of continuous transitions , for some subsets of parameter values
the susceptibility in fig .
[ suscept ] . theory . ] , @xmath15 and @xmath22 . here
@xmath23 . ] , @xmath15 . ] , vs. @xmath24 for @xmath20 , @xmath25 , @xmath15 and @xmath22 . ]
we have found 3-brane configurations in the 5d , anisotropic , abelian higgs model .
they may be in either the coulomb or the higgs phases .
the fields in these configurations are _ confined _ on these layers .
this confinement is not put in by hand it is the defining characteristic of the layered phase(s ) .
the transitions between these layered phases and the usual bulk phases are , generically , 1st order ; however it is also possible to find subsets in the space of parameter values , that lead to second order transitions .
this points to the possibility of new , strongly coupled , continuum theories@xcite , whose elucidation is of major interest .
it is to be noted that yang - mills theories should exhibit @xmath26-brane configurations with @xmath27 , since they have a coulomb phase in more than four dimensions .
another alternative , relevant for four dimensions , would be the partial breaking of the yang - mills gauge group , that leaves a @xmath14 factor in the residual gauge group .
9 y. k. fu and h. b. nielsen , _ nucl .
_ * b236 * ( 1984 ) 167 ; _ nucl .
* b254 * ( 1985 ) 127 .
p. hernndez , these proceedings ; y. kikukawa , these proceedings . c. p. korthals - altes , s. nicolis and j. prades , _ phys .
lett . _ * b316 * ( 1993 ) 339 , [ hep - lat/9306017 ]
. a. hulsebos , c. p. korthals - altes and s. nicolis , _ nucl .
phys . _ * b450 * ( 1995 ) 437 , [ hep - th/9406003 ] .
a. hulsebos , _ nucl .
* 42 * ( 1995 ) 618 , [ hep - lat/9412031 ] ; p. dimopoulos , k. farakos , a. kehagias and g. koutsoumbas , [ hep - th/0007079 ] , _ nucl . phys . _
* b * _ in press _
p. dimopoulos , k. farakos , c. p. korthals - altes , g. koutsoumbas and s. nicolis , _ j. high energy phys .
_ * 02(2001)005 * [ hep - lat/0012028 ] .
p. dimopoulos , k. farakos and s. nicolis , _ multi - layer structure in the strongly coupled 5d abelian higgs model _ , [ hep - lat/0105014 ]
also p. dimopoulos , k. farakos and s. nicolis , these proceedings . | anisotropy relevant perturbation for gauge theories coupling to fermions allows chiral fermions on lattice in overlap or domain wall variants continuum limit taken new phase of layers 3-branes appears transition to 5d confining phase second order studied scalar fields included additional `` layered phase appears stack of 3-branes one lattice spacing in higgs phase fields confined on each layer phase diagram five phases three bulk two layered : confining phase bulk higgs phase coulomb phase layered coulomb higgs phase obtained phase diagram by monte carlo simulations mean field theory calculations phase of layers '' solution of mean field classical equations of motion use standard compact abelian higgs action provision for different couplings along single ( @xmath5 ) direction from four@xmath6\\ \beta_{h}^{\prime\sum x \varphi^{*}(x) ) -{ 5}(x ) x+\hat 5)\sum x} - 2\beta_{r}-4 \beta{h}-\prime\varphi^{*}(x)\varphi x{r}(x x)\end{array }\label{compactaction} order parameters expectation values plaquette bulk @xmath7 transverse direction @xmath8 @xmath9 susceptibility link bulk @xmath10 @xmath11 phase higgs field @xmath12 @xmath13 phase diagram 5d anisotropic compact @xmath14 theory fig . u1phasediag] higgs adds two dimensions fix @xmath15 @xmath16 vary @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 weak 4d gauge coupling snapshot u1higgsphasediagw @xmath20 strong 4d coupling snapshot fig . u1higgsphasediags strong coupling @xmath3 phase no longer theregeneric values higgs parameters @xmath17 @xmath21we phase transitions 1st order display hysteresis loops for bulk transverse plaquettes @xmath7 @xmath8 in figs . transitions from bulk phase @xmath0 to higgs phases @xmath4 @xmath1 hints continuous transitions subsets parameter values susceptibility fig . theory @xmath15 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath15 @xmath24 @xmath20 @xmath25 3-brane configurations in 5d anisotropic abelian higgs model coulomb or higgs phases fields confined on layers confinement defining characteristic layered phase(s transitions between layered phases bulk phases 1st order subsets parameter values to second order transitions possibility new coupled continuum theories elucidation major interest yang - mills theories exhibit @xmath26-brane configurations with @xmath27 coulomb phase in more than four dimensions alternative four dimensions partial breaking yang - mills gauge group @xmath14 factor in residual gauge group 9 y. k. fu h. b. nielsen nuclb236 1984 ) 167 nucl b254 1985 ) 127 hernndez proceedings kikukawa korthals - altes s nicolis j prades phys . b316 1993 ) 339 hep - lat/9306017 hulsebos korthals - altes nicolis nucl b450 1995 ) 437 hep - th/9406003 hulsebos nucl 42 1995 ) 618 hep - lat/9412031 dimopoulos farakos kehagias koutsoumbas hep - th/0007079 ] nucl dimopoulos farakos korthals - altes koutsoumbas s nicolis high energy phys 02(2001)005 hep - lat/0012028 ] dimopoulos farakos s. nicolis multi - layer structure 5d abelian higgs model hep - lat/0105014 dimopoulos farakos s. nicolis proceedings | 0.261105 | 1,524 | 803 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,128 | photonic band structure of metal - dielectric and semiconductor - dielectric layered structures are studied in the presence of a strong absorption .
it is shown that absorption can enlarge some gaps by as much as @xmath0 .
optical absorption and emission spectroscopy , superlattices , greens function method | there has been a growing interest in photonic crystals , i. e. , structures with a periodically modulated dielectric constant .
the latter open new ways of manipulating electromagnetic wave emission and propagation processes @xcite .
in fact , there is a common belief that , in the near future , photonic crystals systems will allow us to perform many functions with light that ordinary crystals do with electrons @xcite .
they also promise to become a laboratory for testing fundamental processes involving interactions of radiation with matter under novel conditions . the basic principle behind all that is an analogy to an electron moving in a periodic potential which suggests that certain photon frequencies in a photonic crystal can also become forbidden , independent of photon polarization and the direction of propagation - a complete photonic bandgap ( cpbg ) .
however , unlike in an ideal single - electron picture , a photon always faces the possibility of being absorbed and it is , _ a priori _ not clear if theoretical proposals for manufacturing a cpbg and which are obtained in the absence of absorption @xcite can ever be realized experimentally .
naively , one expects that moderate absorption will only cause a slight perturbation of the band structure as confirmed in ref .
therefore , the neglect of absorption in band structure calculations seem to be justified for purely dielectric photonic structures @xcite . unfortunately , such structures exhibit only a limited dielectric contrast which is insufficient to open a cpbg below infrared wavelengths @xcite . a recent proposal @xcite to obtain such a cpbg involves metallo - dielectric structures .
since metals are usually rather absorbing , this again raises the question about the effect of absorption on band structure .
here we mention in passing that systems with gain , i.e. , where the imaginary part of the dielectric function @xmath1 has the opposite sign , are important for understanding laser action in new types of lasers involving photonic crystals @xcite .
although the study of absorption in photonic structures is of utmost importance , so far no rigorous results exist about fundamental matters such as the meaning of band structure and band gaps for absorptive systems . only recently
, using analytic continuation techniques , it has been shown that absorption turns bands into resonances in the lower - half complex plane @xcite .
literature on absorption in photonic crystals is rather sparse and , except for a recent article by yannopapas , modinos , and stefanou @xcite , only covers the cases of small absorption @xcite and small filling fraction ( @xmath2 ) of the absorptive component @xcite .
in order to investigate numerically the effect of considerable absorption on the band structure of photonic crystals , we started with studying a one - dimensional model consisting of a periodically layered ( or stratified ) medium , described by the dielectric function @xmath3 here @xmath4 is the lattice constant , i.e. , the length of the primitive cell , @xmath5 is an integer , and @xmath6 .
propagation of light at normal incidence in such a stratified medium is described by the one - dimensional periodic helmholtz equation @xmath7\,\psi({\bf x})=0 , \label{1dhe}\ ] ] where @xmath8 is the laplacian , @xmath9 the angular frequency , @xmath10 the speed of light in vacuum and @xmath11 an eigenfunction to be calculated .
another physical situation to which the one - dimensional periodic helmholtz equation applies ( [ 1dhe ] ) are grating - like structures @xcite , the so called one - dimensional ( 1d ) photonic crystals @xcite , and a number of different physical situations involving propagation of acoustic and elastic waves @xcite .
below a scatterer will be a region with @xmath12 neighboured by regions with @xmath13 . for notational simplicity we also set @xmath14 .
in the absence of absorption , the dispersion relation and the band structure are determined by the kkr equation , which in one dimension is identical to the kronig - penney equation @xcite @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the bloch momentum and @xmath17 is a phase shift @xcite .
the latter is determined by relations @xmath18 , \nonumber \\ \sin\eta_0 & = & c_0\left[-\sin \sigma r_s\cos\rho r_s + p \,\cos\sigma r_s
\sin\rho r_s \right ] , \nonumber \\ \cos\eta_1 & = & c_1\left[\sin \sigma r_s\sin\rho r_s + p \,\cos\sigma r_s
\cos\rho r_s \right ] , \nonumber \\ \sin\eta_1 & = & c_1\left[\cos \sigma r_s\sin\rho r_s - p\,\sin\sigma r_s \cos\rho r_s \right ] , \nonumber \\ c_l & = & \left\ { \begin{array}{cc } \left[1 + ( p^2 - 1)\,\sin^2\rho r_s\right]^{-1/2 } , & l=0,\\ \left [ 1 + ( p^2 - 1)\,\cos^2\rho r_s\right]^{-1/2 } , & l=1 , \end{array}\right . \nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath19 , @xmath20 , and @xmath21 @xcite . equation ( [ kkreq ] ) still holds for absorbing scatterers but the ( frequency - dependent ) phase shifts @xmath17 are now complex . consequently , @xmath22 is complex and eq .
( [ kkreq ] ) has no real eigenvalues . in accordance with @xcite ,
the eigenvalues turn into resonances in the lower complex half - plane
. some characteristic features of the complex bands of resonances can already be seen in the long - wavelength limit ( @xmath23 ) , when eq .
( [ kkreq ] ) reduces to @xmath24 here @xmath25 is the _ effective dielectric constant_. if we denote by @xmath26 the absorptive material filling fraction , then @xmath27 i.e. , @xmath25 is nothing but the volume averaged dielectric constant . in the long - wavelength limit
, the first complex band contains an angle @xmath28 with the real positive axis which is determined by the relation @xmath29 in the limit @xmath30 , @xmath31 and hence @xmath32 . for @xmath33 and @xmath34 one
has @xmath35 down to such @xmath26 that @xmath36 and @xmath37 . in this range of @xmath26 ,
@xmath28 exhibits only a very weak dependence on @xmath26 .
surprisingly enough , as shown in fig .
1 , exact numerical calculations demonstrate that the angle @xmath38 remains very close to its value established in the long - wavelength limit often till the upper edge of the second complex band of resonances .
we determined the resonances numerically for an ensemble of 1d systems with i m @xmath39 varied between @xmath40 and @xmath41 for fixed @xmath42 and re @xmath43 .
we investigated how absorption alters the relative gap width @xmath44 , where @xmath45 and @xmath46 are the gap width and midgap frequency of the real part of @xmath9 , respectively .
the following lessons can be learned from an investigation of the first few bands of complex resonances for a representative sample of such 1d absorptive systems : 1 .
if ( i m @xmath39)/(re @xmath47 , the effect of absorption on the band gap is negligible ( both in shifting the gap edges and in changing gap width ) ( see figs . 2 and 3 ) 2 .
re @xmath48 remains a monotonically increasing ( decreasing ) function of the bloch momentum for an odd ( even ) band ( when labelled from the lowest one ) 3 .
absorption pushes band edges down ( see fig .
2 ) 4 . if i m @xmath39 increases , the corresponding @xmath49 tend to saturate rapidly beyond i m @xmath50 re @xmath39 ( see fig .
the dependence of the relative gap width @xmath49 on i m @xmath39 is monotonic up to i m @xmath51 re @xmath39 ( see fig .
absorption mostly increases the relative gap width @xmath49 , although in some rare cases it can also lead to a decrease of @xmath49 7 .
the largest effect was an increase of the @xmath49 by @xmath0 ( see fig .
3 ) and closing of the 2nd gap which , however , reappeared again as i m @xmath39 increased sufficiently enough 8 . even if the absorptive material filling fraction @xmath26 within the unit cell
is @xmath52 and i m @xmath39 is comparable to re @xmath39 , the imaginary part of the bloch frequency eigenvalues is @xmath53 .
actually , it has been quite surprising to find out that the imaginary part of the frequency eigenvalues can increase when the absorptive material filling fraction within the unit cell is lowered ! it is noteworthy to say that a band gap in re @xmath9 does not necessarily imply a very high reflectivity .
a study of finite layered structures reveals that in the presence of a strong absorption the reflectivity at the gap center can , for instance , saturate at @xmath54 or less , depending on a single bilayer absorption .
the latter yields a lower bound on the absorption of a composite structure .
the reflectivity at the gap center is usually more than twice that for frequencies within a band , almost exclusively as a result of decreased absorption within the gap which approaches that of a single bilayer . in both cases transmissions
are small .
if @xmath55 denotes the transmission for frequencies within a band , then the transmission within a gap is typically @xmath56 .
a typical system to which our calculation should apply is a polymer - semiconductor or polymer - insulator layered structure where the polymer absorption dominates .
our model calculations can also apply to a semiconductor - semiconductor or semiconductor - insulator heterostructure in which one component is doped by an increasing amount of an absorptive dye .
our choice of @xmath39 can also be regarded as that of a metal , or an artificial metal @xcite , for frequencies above the plasma wavelength .
to our best knowledge , our work is the first one to deal with the case of the photonic band structure in the presence of a strong absorption , when both @xmath57 and @xmath26 are large ( @xmath58 and @xmath59 ) ( cf .
@xcite ) . such a study of strong absorption in photonic structures is of utmost importance , both for understanding the behaviour of recently proposed metallo - dielectric structures with cpbg s below infrared wavelengths @xcite and for new types of lasers involving photonic crystals @xcite .
more realistic calculations involving dispersion of the dielectric constant and including transmission and reflection properties of finite layered structures will appear elsewhere .
this work is part of the research program by the stichting voor fundamenteel onderzoek der materie ( foundation for fundamental research on matter ) which was made possible by financial support from the nederlandse organisatie voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek ( netherlands organization for scientific research ) .
a. moroz , phys .
. lett . * 83 * , 5274 ( 1999 ) ; photonic crystals of coated metallic spheres , to appear in europhys .
h. van der lem and a. moroz , towards two - dimensional complete photonic - band - gap structures below infrared wavelengths , to appear in j. opt .
a : pure appl .
opt .
m. m. sigalas , c. m. soukoulis , c. t. chan , and k. m. ho , phys .
b * 49 * , 11 080 ( 1994 ) ; v. kuzmiak and a. a. maradudin , phys . rev .
b * 55 * , 7427 ( 1997 ) ; l .- m .
li , z .- q .
zhang , and x. zhang , phys .
b * 58 * , 15589 ( 1998 ) .
h. s. szer , j. w. haus , and r. inguva , phys .
b * 45 * , 13962 ( 1992 ) ; a. barra , d. cassagne , and c. jouanin , appl .
72 , 627 ( 1998 ) ; r. biswas , m. m. sigalas , g. subramania , and k .-
ho , phys . rev .
b * 57 * , 3701 ( 1998 ) ; a. moroz and c. sommers , j. phys . : condens .
matter * 11 * , 997 ( 1999 ) . | growing interest in photonic crystals structures with periodically modulated dielectric constant open manipulating electromagnetic wave emission propagation common belief photonic crystals systems functions with light ordinary crystals promise laboratory for testing interactions radiation with matter under novel conditions principle analogy to electron moving in periodic potential suggests certain photon frequencies in photonic crystal can become forbidden independent - complete photonic bandgap ( cpbg ) unlike photon faces possibility of being absorbed not clear if theoretical proposals for manufacturing cpbg of absorption can be realized experimentally moderate absorption slight perturbation of band structure neglect of absorption in band structure calculations justified for purely dielectric photonic structures structures exhibit limited dielectric contrast insufficient to open cpbg below infrared wavelengths recent proposal to obtain cpbg involves metallo - dielectric structures metals usually absorbing raises question about effect of absorption on band structure systems with gain dielectric function opposite sign important for understanding laser action in new lasers involving photonic crystalsstudy of absorption in photonic structures no rigorous results about band structure band gaps for absorptive systems recently shown absorption turns bands into resonances in lower - half complex plane literature on absorption sparse recent article by yannopapas modinos stefanou covers small absorption small filling fraction absorptive component to investigate effect of absorption on band structure started studying one - model periodically layered stratified medium described by dielectric function @xmath3 @xmath4 lattice constant length cell @xmath5 integer @xmath6 propagation of light at normal incidence in stratified medium described by one - dimensional periodic helmholtz equation @xmath7( @xmath8 laplacian @xmath9 angular frequency @xmath10 speed of light in vacuum @xmath11 eigenfunction situation applies grating - like structures one - dimensional photonic crystals different physical situations involving propagation of acoustic elastic waves below scatterer region with @xmath12 neighboured by regions with @xmath13 for set @xmath14 absence of absorption dispersion relation band structure determined by kkr equation identical to kronig - penney equation @xmath15 @xmath16 is bloch momentum @xmath17 phase shift latter determined by relations @xmath18 \sin\eta_0 = c_0\left\sigma r_s\rho r_s + p\eta_1 = c_1\left r + p\eta_1 = c_1\left\rho r_s - p\nonumber c_l & =\left{array[1 + ( p^2 - 1)^2\rho r_s\right{-1/2 } l=0 1 + ( p^2 - 1)^2\rho r_s\right]^{-1/2 } l=1\end{array}\right\nonumber{aligned} @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xcite equation holds for absorbing scatterers frequency - dependent phase shifts @xmath17 complex @xmath22 complexkkreq ] ) no eigenvalues eigenvalues turn into resonances lower complex half - plane characteristic features complex bands resonances in long - wavelength limit @xmath23 ) reduces to @xmath24 @xmath25 effective dielectric constant @xmath26 absorptive material filling fraction @xmath25 volume averaged dielectric constant long - wavelength limit first complex band contains angle @xmath28 positive axis determined by relation @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 to @xmath26 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath28 weak dependence on @xmath26 angle @xmath38 remains close to value long - wavelength limit upper edge second complex band resonances determined resonances for 1d systems @xmath39 between @xmath40 and @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 investigated absorption alters relative gap width @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 gap width midgap frequency of part @xmath9 lessons from first bands of complex resonances for 1d absorptive systems@xmath39)/ @xmath47 effect absorption on band gap negligible shifting gap edges changing gap width see figs . 2 3 @xmath48 monotonically increasing decreasing function bloch momentum for odd band labelled lowest absorption pushes band edges down fig . 2 @xmath39 increases @xmath49 saturate beyond @xmath50 re @xmath39 relative gap width @xmath49 on @xmath39 monotonic up to @xmath51 re @xmath39 absorption increases gap width @xmath49 rare cases to decrease @xmath49 largest effect increase @xmath49 by @xmath0 fig . 3 closing 2nd gap reappeared as @xmath39 increased absorptive material filling fraction @xmath26 @xmath52 @xmath39 comparable to @xmath39 imaginary part bloch frequency eigenvalues is @xmath53 imaginary frequency eigenvalues increase when absorptive material filling fraction lowered band gap in @xmath9 imply high reflectivity study finite layered structures strong absorption reflectivity at gap center can saturate at @xmath54 or less depending single bilayer absorptionlatter yields lower bound absorption composite structure reflectivity at gap center twice for frequencies within band decreased absorption gap single bilayer both transmissions small @xmath55 transmission for frequencies within band transmission gap typically @xmath56 typical system calculation polymer - semiconductor polymer - insulator layered structure polymer absorption dominates calculations apply semiconductor - - insulator heterostructure one component doped by absorptive dye choice of @xmath39 metal artificial metal for frequencies above plasma wavelength work first deal photonic band structure strong absorption @xmath57 @xmath26 large @xmath58 @xmath59 study of strong absorption in photonic structures for understanding behaviour metallo - dielectric structures cpbg s below infrared wavelengths new lasers involving photonic crystals realistic calculations dispersion dielectric constant transmission reflection properties of finite layered structures appear elsewhere work part of research program stichting voor fundamenteel onderzoek der materie possible financial support nederlandse organisatie voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek a. moroz , phys . lett83 * 5274 1999 ) photonic crystals coated metallic spheres europhys h van der lem a moroz two - dimensional photonic - band gap structures infrared wavelengths opt sigalas soukoulis chan k ho 49 11 080 ( 1994 ) v. kuzmiak maradudin 55 7427 ( 1997 ) li zhang x zhang 58 15589 ( 1998 ) s szer. haus r. inguva phys 45 13962 ( 1992 ) a. barra d. cassagne c. jouanin appl 72 627 ( 1998 ) r. biswas sigalas subramania k ho phys . 57 * 3701 ( 1998 ) a. moroz c. sommers. condens matter 11 997 ( 1999 ) | 0.434914 | 2,828 | 1,436 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,134 | the wegner - houghton formulation of the exact renormalization group evolution equation is used in order to study the chiral symmetry breaking of the linear @xmath0-model coupled to an isospin doublet of quarks . a numerical investigation for a particular truncation of the equation which includes the scalar field renormalization function
is presented . | the full understanding of the phase structure of qcd as the theory of strong interactions has become an important issue since the discovery of asymptotic freedom .
the possibility that high temperature qcd could show different properties from the theory at zero temperature has been addressed already in @xcite .
new features are also predicted for the theory at very high and intermediate baryon density @xcite , @xcite
. an essential role is played by the chiral symmetry which is supposed to be broken by the vacuum structure of the theory .
thus , before considering the high temperature phase transition with the chiral symmetry restoration , one has to deal with the problem of determining a nonzero order parameter which indicates the chiral symmetry breaking ( csb ) at zero temperature and density .
a strong simplification is obtained by considering the effective theory described by a linear @xmath0 model of scalar mesons coupled to an isospin multiplet of fermions with the same chiral symmetry group of the original action
. then csb corresponds to a mexican hat - shaped effective potential and the order parameter is identified with the vacuum expectation value ( vev ) of one of the scalar fields .
the infrared ( ir ) properties of a field theory such as the vacuum structure , can be analysed by means of the wilsonian renormalization group which generates a sequence of effective actions defined at some momentum scale @xmath1 , starting from the original action , by integrating out in the latter all the modes with frequency higher than @xmath1 .
this leads to the construction of a differential flow equation for the @xmath1-dependent action , generally known as exact renormalization group equation ( erge ) . in the past years many analytical and numerical approaches to the erge , applied to various theories , have been developed .
two recent extensive reviews of this topic are @xcite and a detailed erge analysis of the chiral phase transition can be found in @xcite . here
we shall consider just the simple case of the csb at zero temperature employing the sharp cut - off version of the erge , namely the wegner - hougton equation @xcite .
the cut - off dependence of the erge for the o(4 ) linear @xmath0-model has been addressed in@xcite where , however only the flow of the scalar potential is considered while the yukawa coupling is kept fixed .
in addition to the yukawa coupling flow , we are particularly interested in the behavior of the field renormalization .
in fact , if our model is really an effective theory which , at some scale , can naturally replace the original qcd action , then at this scale one expects the formation of the mesonic bound states characterized by a very small wave function renormalization function .
the reduction of qcd to the quark - meson action has been analysed before and a review of it is given in @xcite .
as expected the value of the scalar field renormalization is vanishingly small at the mesonic bound state formation scale which is found between 0.60 and 0.63 gev .
then , the flow of the field renormalization deserves particular attention .
the explicit form of the euclidean action at a scale @xmath1 is ( @xmath2 ) @xmath3 @xmath4 is a flavor doublet and the summation over the index @xmath5 is extended to @xmath6 colors . no csb fermion mass term is included and the action is fully invariant under chiral transformations . the presence of csb depends on the shape of the o(4 ) symmetric potential @xmath7 in the limit @xmath8 .
@xmath9 and @xmath10 are the @xmath0 and @xmath11 renormalization functions .
as long as @xmath7 has zero vacuum expectation value ( vev ) , we choose the following parametrization @xmath12 and consider the flow of the two parameters @xmath13 and @xmath14 neglecting all the irrelevant operators that could be generated during the flow . in the presence of a nonvanishing vev @xmath15 , according to @xcite , we reparametrize the potential in terms of @xmath15 and @xmath14 , recalling that @xmath13 can be expressed in term of these two parameters through the minimum condition .
the purpose of this double choice is practical , we take the couple of parameters which corresponds to the simplest set of flow equations . the wegner - houghton equation can be reduced to a set of coupled ordinary differential equations for the @xmath1 dependent parameters in ( [ eq : leq ] ) , i.e. @xmath16 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath14 and @xmath13 or @xmath15 . in particular the equations for the parameters in the potential are deduced in @xcite , and the one for @xmath16 can be obtained by an analogous procedure .
the equations for @xmath9 , @xmath10 , ( which coincide as long as @xmath17 , according to the chiral simmetry ) are deduced following the procedure formulated in @xcite and already implemented in @xcite . in the following , the derivatives of @xmath9 and @xmath10 w.r.t .
the fields , which are supposed to be small , are neglected . the pion decay constant and the constituent fermion mass are two ir constraints for our equations .
in fact , in the limit @xmath8 we have @xmath18 gev and @xmath19 gev , as initial conditions for the equations .
if we start , according to @xcite , the flow at the uv scale @xmath20 gev with a convex potential ( @xmath21 ) , then at a certain scale @xmath22 , @xmath13 becomes negative generating a nonzero @xmath15 . in the following the three remaining initial conditions
imposed are @xmath17 at the csb scale @xmath22 and a particular value for @xmath9 at the uv scale ( the symmetry requires @xmath23 at the uv scale ) .
figure [ fig : uno ] shows , above @xmath22 ( fixed at the value @xmath27 gev ) , the flow of the scalar mass @xmath28 ( the subscript @xmath1 is omitted ) for two different initial values of @xmath29 and , below @xmath22 , the corresponding @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
the curves for @xmath30 and @xmath31 in the two cases are almost superposed indicating insensitivity to the uv condition on @xmath32 .
the value of @xmath22 is suggested by an ir stability criterion . in order to use a particular value of quark mass , @xmath24 , as the initial condition for the running quantity @xmath31 defined above
, @xmath31 must be practically flat around @xmath33 .
the same criterion should apply to @xmath34 but , since @xmath34 is smaller than @xmath24 , we find that @xmath30 at the scale @xmath35 is already a stable parameter . after fixing the ir condition @xmath36 with @xmath37 gev
, we have considered the ratio @xmath38 , plotted vs. @xmath22 in figure [ fig : due ] for two different values of @xmath24 .
the stability requirement indicates that @xmath22 should not be smaller than @xmath39 gev . in figures [ fig
: tre ] and [ fig : quattro ] the other running parameters are displayed for the same two initial values of @xmath32 that have been used in figure [ fig : uno ] .
it should be noted the small running of @xmath40 and @xmath41 , in the range of @xmath1 considered , and their large values which are clearly nonperturbative . as shown in figure [ fig : quattro ] ,
when going from the uv to the ir scale , the field renormalizations grow and , below @xmath22 , @xmath32 and @xmath42 increase differently .
since reasonably we expect , for the pion physics at scales around @xmath43 gev , field renormalization functions close to the unity , we must require very small values at @xmath20 gev .
namely we used @xmath44 and @xmath45 in the two cases here considered in figures [ fig : uno],[fig : tre ] , [ fig : quattro ] .
higher curves for @xmath46 correspond to the former case , lower curves to the latter .
the approximation here employed for the erge has been sufficient for exploring a nonperturbative region ( note that , as explained in @xcite , the renormalized couplings which include the field renormalization effect , are larger than those in figure [ fig : tre ] ) and it has yielded a very small ( vanishing ) scalar field renormalization around @xmath47 gev .
we hope to extend our analysis to the finite temperature case . 9 j.c .
collins and m.j .
perry , phys .
34 ( 1975 ) 1353 .
d. bailin and a. love , phys .
107 ( 1984 ) 325 .
m. alford , k. rajagopal and f. wilczek , phys .
422b ( 1998 ) 247 .
r. rapp , t. shafer , e.v .
shuryak and m. velkovsky , phys .
rev . lett .
81 ( 1998 ) 53 .
c. bagnuls and c. bervillier , exact renormalization group equations . an introductory review , preprint e - print arch.:hep - th/0002034 , feb 2000 .
j. berges , n. tetradis , c. wetterich , nonperturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics , preprint mit - ctp-2980 , hd - thep-00 - 26 , e - print arch.:hep - ph/0005122 , may 2000 . submitted to phys .
j. berges , n. tetradis and c. wetterich , phys .
77 ( 1996 ) 873 .
jungnickel and c. wetterich , phys .
d53 ( 1996 ) 5142 .
j. berges , d .- u .
jungnickel and c. wetterich , phys .
d59 ( 1999 ) 034010 .
j. berges , qcd in extreme conditions and the wilsonian exact renormalization group , preprint mit - ctp-2829 , e - print arch .
: hep - ph/9902419 .
f.j . wegner and a. houghton , phys .
a8 ( 1972 ) 401 .
g. papp , b.j .
schaefer , h.j .
pirner and j. wambach , phys .
d61 ( 2000 ) 096002 . c. fraser , z. phys .
c28 ( 1985 ) 101 .
a. bonanno and d. zappal , phys .
d56 ( 1997 ) 3759 . | understanding phase structure of qcd interactions important since discovery asymptotic freedom high temperature qcd show different properties from zero temperature addressed in @xcite new features predicted for at high intermediate baryon density essential role chiral symmetry broken by vacuum structure high temperature phase transition with chiral symmetry restoration determining nonzero order parameter chiral symmetry breaking at zero temperature density simplification effective theory by linear @xmath0 model of scalar mesons isospin multiplet of fermions with same chiral symmetry group csb corresponds to mexican hat - shaped effective potential order parameter identified with vacuum expectation value vev scalar infrared properties of field theory vacuum structure analysed wilsonian renormalization group generates effective actions at momentum scale @xmath1 original action integrating modes frequency higher leads to differential flow equation for @xmath1-dependent action known as exact renormalization group equation ( erge analytical numerical approaches to erge developed recent reviews @xcite detailed erge analysis of chiral phase transition in @xcite consider csb at zero temperature cut - off erge wegner - hougton equation @xcite cut - off dependence erge for o(4 ) linear @xmath0-model addressed in@xcite flow scalar potential considered yukawa coupling fixed interested in behavior field renormalization model effective original qcd action expects mesonic bound states small wave function renormalization reduction qcd to quark - meson action analysed review in @xcite value scalar field renormalization small at mesonic bound state formation scale between 0.60 and 0.63 gev flow field renormalization deserves attention euclidean action scale @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 flavor doublet summation index @xmath5 extended to @xmath6 no csb fermion mass term action invariant under chiral transformations presence csb depends on shape o(4 ) symmetric potential @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath0 @xmath11 renormalization functions @xmath7 zero vacuum expectation value choose parametrization @xmath12 consider flow parameters @xmath13 and @xmath14 neglecting irrelevant operatorsnonvanishing vev @xmath15 @xcite reparametrize potential @xmath15 @xmath14 @xmath13 expressed two parameters through minimum condition purpose double choice practical take parameters simplest flow equations wegner - houghton equation reduced to coupled ordinary differential equations for @xmath1 dependent parameters @xmath16 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath14 @xmath13 @xmath15 equations for parameters potential deduced in @xcite @xmath16 analogous procedure equations for @xmath9 @xmath10 coincide @xmath17 deduced procedure @xcite derivatives of @xmath9 @xmath10 fields small neglected pion decay constant constituent fermion mass ir constraints for equations limit @xmath8 @xmath18 gev @xmath19 gev initial conditions for equations start @xcite flow at uv scale @xmath20 gev with convex potential @xmath21 ) certain scale @xmath22 @xmath13 becomes negative generating nonzero @xmath15 .three initial conditions are @xmath17 csb scale @xmath22 @xmath9 uv scale requires @xmath23 uv scale figure uno shows above @xmath22 fixed value @xmath27 gev flow scalar mass @xmath28 subscript @xmath1 omitted for two values @xmath29 below @xmath22 @xmath30 @xmath31 curves for @xmath30 superposed insensitivity to uv condition on @xmath32 value @xmath22 suggested by ir stability criterion use @xmath24 initial condition for running quantity @xmath31 must be flat around @xmath33 same criterion @xmath34 smaller than @xmath30 at scale @xmath35 stable after fixing ir condition @xmath36 with @xmath37 gev considered ratio @xmath38 vs. @xmath22 for two values @xmath24 stability requirement indicates @xmath22 not smaller than @xmath39 gev figures tre quattro other running parameters for two initial values of @xmath32 small running of @xmath40 and @xmath41 in range of @xmath1 large values nonperturbativein figure quattro from uv to ir scale field renormalizations grow below @xmath22 increase differently pion physics around @xmath43 gev field renormalization functions close to unity small values at @xmath20 gev used @xmath44 @xmath45 in cases figures higher curves for @xmath46 former lower latter approximation for erge sufficient for nonperturbative region renormalized couplings field renormalization effect larger than in figure yielded small vanishing scalar field renormalization around @xmath47 gev hope to extend analysis to finite temperature case collins perry phys . 34 ( 1975 ) 1353 bailin love phys . 107 ( 1984 ) 325 alford rajagopal wilczek phys . 422b ( 1998 ) 247 rapp shafer shuryak velkovsky phys . rev . lett . 81 ( 1998 ) 53 bagnuls bervillier exact renormalization group equations introductory review - th/0002034 feb 2000 berges tetradiswetterich nonperturbative renormalization quantum field theory statistical preprint ctp-2980 26 print - ph/0005122 may 2000 submitted berges tetradis wetterich 77 1996 ) 873 jungnickel wetterich d53 1996 ) 5142 berges jungnickel wetterich d59 1999 ) 034010 qcd extreme conditions wilsonian renormalization group preprint ctp-2829 print hep - ph/9902419 wegner houghton phys . a8 1972 ) 401 papp schaefer pirner wambach phys d61 2000 ) 096002 fraser c28 ( 1985 ) 101 bonanno zappal phys d56 1997 ) 3759 | 0.35372 | 2,406 | 1,285 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,138 | we enlighten relations between the klln function , allowing in a simple way to distinguish between virtual and real processes involving massive particles , and the dilogarithms occurring as results of loop calculations for such kind of processes .
mitp/14 - 032 + * virtual and real processes , the klln function , + and the relation to dilogarithms * + l. kaldame@xmath0 and s. groote@xmath1 + @xmath0 loodus- ja tehnoloogiateaduskond , fsika instituut , + tartu likool , the 4 , 51010 tartu , estonia + @xmath2prisma cluster of excellence , institut fr physik , johannes - gutenberg - universitt , + staudinger weg 7 , 55099 mainz , germany | looking more closely at the klln function @xmath17 of three particles with masses @xmath18 , @xmath19 and @xmath20 , the analytic behaviour unfolds a rich spectrum of real and virtual processes .
the function is zero for any one of the thresholds @xmath21 allowing only positive values for the three masses , in the @xmath22 phase space the zeros of the klln function are located on the three planes spanned by each two of the three face diagonals @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 . up to the general normalization one can visualise the phase space by cutting the first octant by a plane orthogonal to the space diagonal . on this plane
the first octant will appear as upright equilateral _
domain triangle _
[ vireoct ] ) , the corners representing the @xmath26 axes , and the opposite sides representing the coordinate planes @xmath27 .
the zeros of the klln function are found on the three lines connecting the midpoints of the sides of the triangle ( cf . fig .
[ viretri ] ) . the equilateral triangle enclosed by these three lines
is called the _
klln triangle_. while this triangle is the region where the klln function becomes negative , the other three triangles are regions with positive klln function , each of them containing a coordinate axis .
special values are @xmath28 \lambda(m_1 ^ 2,m_2 ^ 2,m_2 ^
2)&=&m_1 ^ 4 - 4m_1 ^ 2m_2 ^ 2\qquad\mbox{(medians ) } , \nonumber\\[7pt ] \lambda(m_1 ^ 2,m_2 ^ 2,0)&=&(m_1 ^ 2-m_2 ^ 2)^2\qquad\mbox{(sides)},\nonumber\\[7pt ] \lambda(m_1 ^ 2,0,0)&=&m_1 ^ 4 \qquad\mbox{(corners)}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] a negative value of the klln function means that the sum of two of the masses is larger than the third one .
this means physically that none of the three particles can decay into the other two .
the process is a virtual one , leaving at least one of the particles off - shell , i.e. with a momentum squared which is smaller than the squared mass of this particle . on the other hand
, a positive klln function means that exactly one decay channel is real .
taking for instance the region connected to the @xmath18 axis , all points in the lower left triangle in fig .
[ viretri ] represent possible decays through the channel @xmath29 because @xmath18 is larger than the sum @xmath30 .
therefore , one can conclude that the triangle in fig .
[ viretri ] gives structure and direction to processes involving three massive particles .
usually , three - particle interactions appear within a more complicated process . in this case
the masses are ( partially ) replaced by invariant squared momenta @xmath31 . on tree level
such a process is a cascade process as explained for instance in refs .
@xcite . for a cascade process
including @xmath32 final particles with masses @xmath26 ( @xmath33 ) the @xmath32-particle phase space @xmath34 can be factorized .
given for instance the momentum @xmath35 of the first particle emitted from this process , the remaining momentum @xmath36 is mediated by a virtual particle .
one can define an invariant mass @xmath37 with @xmath38 with the only condition that @xmath39 is time - like . separating the first phase space integration from the other ones and inserting the trivial identities @xmath40 one obtains @xcite @xmath41 as an example we consider the cascade decay @xmath42 .
the first part @xmath43 of the cascade phase space is given by the phase space @xmath44 of the previous ( simpler ) process @xmath45 where @xmath46 is replaced by @xmath47 .
for the second part @xmath48 one obtains in a similar manner @xmath49 assuming that one can perform the solid angle integrations for the @xmath3 boson ( @xmath50 ) and for the @xmath51 quark ( @xmath52 ) trivially , one is left with the three - particle phase space @xmath53 the example just introduced is an ideal playground for the implications caused by the klln functions in case of integrations over inner lines . even though the intermediate @xmath3 boson can be off - shell , the phase space has to be real .
therefore , the two conditions @xmath54 \lambda(p_w^2,m_c^2,m_s^2)&=&(p_w^2-(m_c - m_s)^2)(p_w^2-(m_c+m_s)^2)\ \ge\ 0\end{aligned}\ ] ] determine the phase space region for @xmath55 and at the same time an appropriate substitution to calculate the integral analytically . taking into account the known quark mass hierarchy
, the two conditions result in @xmath56 neglecting the masses of @xmath51 and @xmath57 quarks , the phase space simplifies to @xmath58 the square root in eq .
( [ intpw2 ] ) can be simplified by choosing one of the factors in eq .
( [ kallentbw ] ) as new variable , e.g.@xmath59 .
the second factor is then given by @xmath60 and the upper limit is given by @xmath61 .
however , @xmath62 is not the optimal choice . using instead
@xmath63 the square root simplifies to @xmath64 the integration can be performed by using @xmath65 , @xmath66 where @xmath67 finally , one can use @xmath68 to obtain @xmath69 to conclude this section , let us dwell on the parameter @xmath70 used in the substitution .
this parameter is related to the masses and the invariant momentum square by @xmath71 comparing with eqs .
( [ ebw ] ) and ( [ pbw ] ) one realizes that @xmath70 is the rapidity for the transition between the @xmath72 and @xmath73 quark rest frames , the exponential representation being @xmath74
dilogarithms appear after integrations like the one in eq .
( [ intpw2 ] ) are performed .
the `` classical '' dilogarithm is given by the integral representation @xmath75 the classical dilogarithm is a special case of a polylogarithm and is an analytical function in the whole complex plane except for the interval @xmath76 $ ] along the positive real axis where the branch cut is located .
starting from the branch point at @xmath77 the branch cut separates two different riemannian sheets of the multi - valued function .
there are two one - parameter and a couple of two- and three - parameter identities that allow to relate dilogarithms with different arguments @xcite .
the two one - parameter identities are given by @xcite @xmath78 an additional useful identity is @xmath79 [ cols=">,^,^,^ , < " , ] for the arguments of the dilogarithms the two identities ( [ dilog1 ] ) and ( [ dilog2 ] ) are involutions .
because of this , one can create a closed chain of transitions for the argument which constitutes a hexagon ( cf.fig .
[ hexagon ] ) . for real - valued arguments
this transition orbit helps to constrain the argument to a value lower or equal to @xmath80 , gaining a real value for the dilogarithm .
a pragmatic argument can be very helpful to choose an appropriate hexagon orbit transition : processes including only real particles have to lead to real phase space integrals .
therefore , a negative argument for the logarithms obtained together with the dilogarithm in calculations like @xmath81 indicate that the argument of the dilogarithm still is not in an appropriate form . a similar orbit , though for complex arguments , is given in refs .
@xcite for the bloch wigner dilogarithm @xmath82 which is mainly ( i.e. up to a double - logarithmic correction ) the imaginary part of the classical dilogarithm .
the identities , induced by the two involutions , are given by @xmath83 and @xmath84 . in ref .
@xcite these identities are applied to the ( complex ) root @xmath85 where the discriminant @xmath17 is again the klln function , assumed to be negative .
an orbit with constant value for @xmath86 given by @xmath87 is obtained by combining the two involutions with a third one , namely the calculation of the complex conjugate . as mentioned in ref .
@xcite , the points of the orbit can be obtained from the starting point @xmath88 by interchanging the squared masses @xmath89 , @xmath90 and @xmath91 .
this invariance describes a symmetry of the bloch wigner dilogarithm which is manifest already for the klln function . in the following we compare these two functions . + because the bloch wigner dilogarithm vanishes for positive values of the klln function , the support of the bloch wigner dilogarithm and the klln function within the domain triangle are both given by the klln triangle shown in fig .
[ viretri ] . a first glimpse on the topographical plot of both functions in fig . [ viretop ] might lead to the conjecture that these functions are the same up to normalization . in order to ( dis)prove this conjecture we have to compare the contour lines of the two functions
. the domain triangle is parametrized by @xmath92 and confined by the three straight lines connecting the points @xmath93 even though the domain triangle and , as a part of it , the klln triangle in fig .
[ viretri ] represent the kinematic situation in the most symmetrical way ( cf .
[ viretop ] ) , there is at least a second representation which is more appropriate for calculating .
one can solve the projective condition @xmath94 with fixed value @xmath95 for @xmath20 . in this case
the domain triangle is projected onto the @xmath96 plane . the resulting _ projective triangle _
is confined by the two axes and the line @xmath97 .
the contour line of the klln function with fixed ( negative ) value @xmath98 in the projective plane @xmath94 is given by @xmath99 for @xmath100 the contour degenerates to a triangle confined by the lines @xmath101 , @xmath102 and @xmath103 which is isomorphic to the klln triangle . for @xmath104 the contour lines run within this projective form of the klln triangle .
it can be easily seen that the minimal value of the klln function is found at @xmath105 with a value @xmath106 . in the parametrization ( [ mxmy ] ) of the domain triangle
the minimum is located at @xmath107 .
the value of the bloch wigner dilogarithm is maximal at the same point @xmath105 ( or @xmath108 ) , resulting in @xmath109 where @xmath110 is the clausen function . however ,
if taking an intermediate value for @xmath98 , a contour line for the klln function has not a constant height for the bloch wigner dilogarithm .
this is shown in fig .
[ virecon ] for three different values of @xmath98 .
in this brief note we have shown that the appearance of the kllen function is always related to the virtuality or reality of three - particle interactions .
we have derived kinematic relations , phase space limits and the relationship to lorentz boosts .
starting from the hexagon orbit for classical dilogarithms we have considered the invariance of the bloch wigner dilogarithm under a similar hexagon orbit , showing similar symmetry properties and the same support for the bloch wigner dilogarithm and the klln function .
however , we have disproved the conjecture that these two functions are related in a simple way .
this work was supported by the estonian institutional research support under grant no .
iut2 - 27 , and by the estonian science foundation under grant no .
s.g . acknowledges support by the mainz institute of theoretical physics ( mitp ) .
j. beringer _
[ particle data group collaboration ] , phys .
* d86 * ( 2012 ) 010001 e. byckling and k. kajantie , phys .
* 187 * ( 1969 ) 2008 e. byckling and k. kajantie , `` particle kinematics , '' john wiley & sons , 1973 l. lewin , `` dilogarithms and associated functions , '' macdonald , london , 1958 d. zagier , `` the dilogarithm function , '' in _ frontiers in number theory , physics , and geometry ii on conformal field theories , discrete groups and renormalization _ pierre cartier , bernard julia , pierre moussa and pierre vanhove ( eds . ) , springer , new york , 2007 , pp . | klln function @xmath17 of three particles masses @xmath18 analytic behaviour unfolds real virtual processes function zero for thresholds @xmath21 positive values for three masses @xmath22 phase space zeros on three planes by face diagonals @xmath23 visualise phase space by cutting first octant plane orthogonal to space diagonal first octant as upright equilateral _ domain triangle corners @xmath26 axes opposite sides coordinate planes @xmath27 zeros on three lines connecting midpoints sides triangle equilateral triangle by lines _ klln triangle_ triangle region where klln function becomes negative other three triangles with positive klln function coordinate axis special values are @xmath28 \lambda(m_1 ^ 2,m_2 ^ 2 ^ 2)&=&m_1 ^ 4 - 4m_1 ^ 2m_2 ^ 2\qquad\mbox{(medians(m_1 2,0)&=&(m_1 ^ 2-m_2 ^ 2)^2{(sides&=&m_1 ^ 4 (cornersnegative value klln function means sum two masses larger than third none of three particles can decay into other two process virtual leaving one off - shell with momentum smaller than mass particle positive klln function means one decay channel real region connected to @xmath18 axis points in lower left triangle represent possible decays through channel @xmath29 because @xmath18 larger than sum @xmath30 triangle gives structure direction to processes involving three massive particles three - particle interactions within complicated process masses partially replaced by invariant squared momenta @xmath31 process cascade process cascade process including @xmath32 particles with masses @xmath26 @xmath32-particle phase space @xmath34 can be factorized remaining momentum @xmath36 mediated by virtual particle define invariant mass @xmath37 with @xmath38 @xmath39 is time - like separating first phase space integration inserting trivial identities @xmath40 obtains @xcite @xmath41 cascade decay @xmath42first part @xmath43 cascade phase space given by @xmath44 previous process @xmath45 @xmath46 replaced by @xmath47 second part @xmath48 obtains @xmath49 solid angle integrations for @xmath3 boson @xmath51 quark three - particle phase space @xmath53 ideal for implications klln functions integrations over inner lines intermediate @xmath3 boson off - shell phase space real two conditions @xmath54 \lambda(p_w^2,m_c^2,m_s^2)=(p_w^2-(m_c - m_s)^2) determine phase space region for @xmath55 substitution calculate integral quark mass hierarchy two conditions result in @xmath56 neglecting masses of @xmath51 @xmath57 quarks phase space simplifies to @xmath58 square root eq simplified choosing one eq new variable.@xmath59 second factor given by @xmath60 upper limit by @xmath61 @xmath62 not optimal choice@xmath63 square root simplifies to @xmath64 integration @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 use @xmath68 obtain @xmath69 dwell on parameter @xmath70 in substitution related to masses invariant momentum square @xmath71 with @xmath70 rapidity transition between @xmath72 and @xmath73 quark rest frames exponential representation @xmath74 dilogarithms appear after integrations classical dilogarithm by integral representation @xmath75 special case polylogarithm analytical function in complex plane except interval @xmath76 positive real axis branch cut branch point at @xmath77 branch cut separates two riemannian sheets of multi - valued function two one - parameter two- three - parameter identities relate dilogarithms with different arguments @xcite two one - parameter identities given by @xcite @xmath78 additional identity @xmath79 arguments dilogarithms two identities dilog1 dilog2 are involutions closed chain of transitions for argument hexagon real - valued arguments transition orbit argument to value lower or equal to @xmath80 gaining real value for dilogarithmpragmatic argument appropriate hexagon orbit transition processes real particles lead to real phase space integrals negative argument for logarithms with dilogarithm in calculations like @xmath81 argument not appropriate similar orbit complex arguments in for bloch wigner dilogarithm @xmath82 imaginary part of classical dilogarithm identities induced by involutions given by @xmath83 and @xmath84 identities applied to complex root @xmath85 discriminant @xmath17 klln function assumed negative orbit with constant value for @xmath86 @xmath87 obtained by combining two involutions with third one calculation complex conjugate points orbit obtained from starting point @xmath88 by interchanging squared masses @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 invariance describes symmetry of bloch wigner dilogarithm manifest for klln function compare two functions bloch wigner dilogarithm vanishes for positive values of klln function support of dilogarithm klln function domain triangle given by klln triangle in fig . [ ] functions same up to normalizationconjecture compare contour lines two functions domain triangle parametrized by @xmath92 confined by three lines connecting points @xmath93 klln triangle kinematic situation second representation appropriate for calculating solve projective condition @xmath94 with fixed value @xmath95 for @xmath20 domain triangle projected @xmath96 plane confined by two axes line @xmath97 contour line klln function with fixed value @xmath98 given by @xmath99 for @xmath100 contour degenerates to triangle confined by lines @xmath101 isomorphic to klln triangle for @xmath104 contour lines run within projective form klln triangle minimal value klln function at @xmath105 value @xmath106 triangle minimum at @xmath107 value bloch wigner dilogarithm maximal at point @xmath105 or @xmath108 resulting in @xmath109 where @xmath110 is clausen function intermediate value for @xmath98 contour line for klln function constant height for bloch wigner dilogarithm shown in fig . for three values of @xmath98shown appearance kllen function related to three - particle interactions derived kinematic relations phase space limits relationship lorentz boosts hexagon orbit considered invariance bloch wigner dilogarithm similar hexagon orbit symmetry properties support klln function disproved conjecture two functions related work supported estonian institutional research grant iut2 - 27 estonian science foundation grant support mainz institute theoretical physics j. beringer particle data group collaboration phys . * d86 * 2012 ) 010001 e. byckling k. kajantie phys . 187 * 1969 ) 2008 particle kinematics john wiley sons 1973 lewin dilogarithms functions macdonald london 1958. zagier dilogarithm function frontiers number theory physics geometry conformal field theories discrete groups renormalization pierre cartier bernard julia pierre moussa pierre vanhove eds springer new york 2007 | 0.436714 | 2,957 | 1,523 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,142 | a formula of luminosity of asymmetric e+e- collider with coupled lattices is derived explicitly .
the calculation shows how the tilted angle and aspect ratio of the beams affect the luminosity . knowing the result of the calculation
, we measure the tilted angle of the luminous region of the collision for pep - ii using two dimensional transverse scan of the luminosity .
the method could be applied to correct the coupling at the collision point . | the luminosity of colliding storage rings is one of the most important criteria of performance . in order to achieve high luminosity
, the colliding beams need to be aligned precisely at the collision point in all three dimensions . for a symmetric collider ,
the alignment of the electron and positron beams is ensured automatically by the symmetries of charge conjugation and time - reversal . since
an asymmetric collider consists of two different storage rings , precise alignment of the two beams at the collision can only be achieved through tuning of the two rings . in this paper ,
our goal is to show some effects on the luminosity when the two beams are not aligned well in transverse planes due to the coupling .
it was shown by edwards and teng@xcite that a two - dimensional coupled linear motion in a periodic and symplectic system can be parameterized with ten independent parameters as a block diagonalization of a one - turn matrix @xmath0 where @xmath1 is the rotation matrix and @xmath2 defines the symplectic transformation from the normalized coordinates to the physical coordinates .
these matrices can be further decomposed into @xmath3 and @xmath4 where @xmath5 is 2@xmath62 identity matrix and @xmath7 are 2@xmath62 symplectic matrices with a determinant of unity .
the angle @xmath8 is called coupling angle . here
we denote the bar as two - dimensional symplectic conjugate @xmath9 where @xmath10 is 2@xmath62 unit symplectic matrix @xmath11 recently , it is pointed out by sagan and rubin@xcite that there exists another solution of parameterization @xmath12 where @xmath13 . in the case of a strongly coupled lattice , for example , the interaction region of the low energy ring(ler ) of pep - ii , both solutions are needed for a complete parameterization of the region . here
we choose @xmath8 as a parameter of linear coupling because it has two very important properties : system is decoupled when @xmath14 and @xmath8 can be changed only by a skew quadrupole or solenoid as shown in fig .
[ fig : coupling ] from which the locations of the skew quadrupoles and solenoid are clearly seen .
in the normalized coordinate , the sigma matrix can be written as @xmath15 where @xmath16 and @xmath17 are the equilibrium emittances in the eigen planes ignoring the off - diagonal terms at the order of the damping increment per turn .
the sigma matrix in the physical coordinate is obtained with the transformation @xmath18 the corresponding equilibrium gaussian distribution is @xmath19 where @xmath20 is the vector of canonical coordinates . the beam profile in the configuration @xmath21 and @xmath22
is derived by integrating the canonical momentum @xmath23 and @xmath24 @xmath25 the result of the integration is @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the vector of configuration coordinates namely @xmath28 and @xmath29 is the inverse of the sigma matrix @xmath30 moreover , the symmetric matrix @xmath29 can be diagonalized by a rotation transformation as shown in fig .
[ fig : rot ] @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the tilted angle of the beam .
the parameters that describe the beam in two coordinate systems relate with each other as following @xmath33 and @xmath34 \nonumber \\ { 1\over\sigma_\eta^2 } & = & { 1\over2 } [ ( k_{xx } + k_{yy } ) - { k_{xx}-k_{yy } \over\cos2\psi}]\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath35 are the elements of @xmath29 and @xmath36 and @xmath37 are the beam size along the long axis @xmath38 and short axis @xmath39 of the ellipse respectively .
for simplicity , we ignore the effect of a finite bunch length . given the two beam profiles , @xmath40 and @xmath41 , the luminosity can be written as @xmath42 where @xmath43 is the number of the colliding bunches , @xmath44 is the revolution frequency , and @xmath45 are the number of charges in each position and electron bunch respectively . at a low beam current ,
the beam distribution is nearly gaussian . using gaussian as an approximation
, we can evaluate the overlapping integral @xmath46 in order to analyze the result of the calculation , we rewrite the integral in terms of the geometrical parameters , @xmath36 , @xmath37 , and @xmath32 by substituting eq . [ eqn : geom ] into eq .
[ eqn : dets ] @xmath47 where @xmath48 and @xmath49 clearly , the luminosity is at its maximum when @xmath50 which is always the case in a symmetric collider due the symmetries .
when two flat beams have identical size , we have @xmath51 it is easy to see that the reduction of the luminosity due to the difference of the two tilted angles are much enhanced by the aspect ratio @xmath36/@xmath37 of the beams .
the luminosity depends upon all six geometrical parameters @xmath52 , and @xmath53 which describe the size and orientation of the beams .
it is impossible to extract these parameters directly from the luminosity alone . by transversely scanning the beam crossing the other one
, we could extract more constraints among them .
let s calculate the overlapping integral with an offset of centroid of a beam @xmath54 after a lengthy but straightforward algebra , we obtain @xmath55 the result agrees with eq . [
eqn : lumi ] when @xmath56 .
@xmath57 is a 2@xmath62 symmetric matrix that has the following elements @xmath58 where @xmath59 and @xmath60.\ ] ] please note that @xmath61 is again gaussian and is normalized to unity @xmath62 thus , similar to the treatment of the single beam profile , we can diagonalize @xmath57 with a rotation @xmath63 @xmath64 \nonumber \\ { 1\over\sigma_\eta^2 } & = & { 1\over2 } [ ( m_{xx } + m_{yy } ) - { m_{xx}-m_{yy } \over\cos2\psi}],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we denote @xmath38 and @xmath39 as the principal axes . as an experiment
, we move one beam against the other one horizontally with a closed orbit bump at the collision point and measure the luminosity as a function of the offset .
the luminosity of the scan is proportional to @xmath65 where @xmath66 to simplify the calculation , let s assume that @xmath67 which is a very good approximation when the luminosity is well optimized . for flat beams and small @xmath32 s , we have @xmath68.\ ] ] we can see that @xmath32 makes @xmath69 smaller than the design value and the effect of @xmath32 is much enhanced by the aspect ratio .
similarly , we carry out the calculation for the vertical scan @xmath70 where @xmath32 makes @xmath71 slightly larger but is not enhanced by the aspect ratio as in the horizontal scan .
more general , we can scan the luminosity as a function of both horizontal and vertical offsets in a two - dimensional grid .
the result of the measurement is shown in fig .
[ fig : scan ] as contour plots of the specific luminosity .
the results of the fitting are @xmath72 @xmath73 m , @xmath74 @xmath73 m , and @xmath75 compared with the design values : @xmath76 @xmath73 m , @xmath77 @xmath73 m , and @xmath78 .
we have calculated the degradation of luminosity due to different tilted angles of colliding beams . for same tilted angles ,
the higher the aspect ratio is the more luminosity reduction will be .
furthermore , we have computed a general luminosity formula for off - centered beams .
the formula is used to understand the luminosity scan , especially for the two - dimensional scan .
we would like to thank w. kozanecki , m. minty , j. seeman , and u. wienands for many helpful discussions . | luminosity of colliding storage rings important criteria performance high luminosity colliding beams need at collision point in three dimensions symmetric collider alignment electron positron beams ensured by charge conjugation time - reversal asymmetric collider two storage rings precise alignment through tuning goal show effects on luminosity when beams not aligned in transverse planes due to coupling by edwards teng two - dimensional coupled linear motion in periodic symplectic system parameterized with ten independent parameters as block diagonalization of one - turn matrix @xmath0 rotation matrix @xmath2 symplectic transformation from to physical coordinates matrices decomposed into @xmath3 @xmath4 symplectic matrices with determinant of unity angle @xmath8 coupling angle bar as two - dimensional symplectic conjugate @xmath9 @xmath10 is 2@xmath62 unit symplectic matrix @xmath11 another solution parameterization @xmath12 @xmath13 strongly coupled lattice both solutions needed for complete parameterizationchoose @xmath8 parameter linear coupling two important properties system decoupled when @xmath14 @xmath8 changed by skew quadrupole or solenoid fig . locations skew quadrupoles solenoid seen normalized coordinate sigma matrix written @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 equilibrium emittances eigen planes ignoring off - diagonal terms damping increment per turn sigma matrix physical coordinate obtained transformation @xmath18 equilibrium gaussian distribution @xmath19 @xmath20 vector canonical coordinates beam profile configuration @xmath21 @xmath22 derived integrating canonical momentum @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 result integration @xmath26 @xmath27 vector configuration coordinates @xmath28 @xmath29 inverse of sigma matrix @xmath30 symmetric matrix @xmath29 diagonalized by rotation transformation fig . @xmath31 @xmath32 tilted angle beam parameters beam two coordinate systems relate @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 elements of @xmath29 @xmath36 @xmath37 beam size along long axis @xmath38 short axis @xmath39 ellipseignore effect finite bunch length two beam profiles @xmath40 and luminosity written as @xmath42 @xmath43 number colliding bunches revolution frequency number charges in each position electron bunch low beam current beam distribution nearly gaussian evaluate overlapping integral @xmath46 rewrite integral geometrical parameters @xmath36 @xmath32 substituting eq. [ eqn : geom ] into eq [ eqn : dets ] @xmath47 luminosity maximum when @xmath50 symmetric collider two flat beams identical size @xmath51 reduction luminosity difference tilted angles enhanced by aspect ratio @xmath36/@xmath37 beams luminosity depends six geometrical parameters @xmath52 @xmath53 size orientation beams impossible to extract parameters from luminosity transversely scanning beam crossing extract more constraints calculate overlapping integral with offset of centroid beam @xmath54 obtain @xmath55 result agrees with eq . [ eqn : lumi ] when @xmath56 @xmath57 2@xmath62 symmetric matrix elements @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60.@xmath61 gaussian normalized to unity @xmath62 single beam diagonalize @xmath57 rotation @xmath63 @xmath64 1\over\sigma_\eta^2 }\over2 ( m_{xx } + m_{yy - m{xx}-m_{yy }\cos2\psi} denote @xmath38 @xmath39 principal axes move one beam horizontally closed orbit bump collision point measure luminosity function offset luminosity proportional to @xmath65 @xmath66 assume @xmath67 good approximation luminosity optimized flat beams small @xmath32 s @xmath68 @xmath32 makes @xmath69 smaller design value effect enhanced by aspect ratio calculation vertical scan @xmath70 @xmath32 makes @xmath71 larger not enhanced by aspect ratio scan luminosity function of horizontal vertical offsets two - dimensional grid result measurement shown in fig . contour plots of specific luminosity results @xmath72 @xmath73 m @xmath74 m @xmath75 compared with design values @xmath76 m @xmath77 m @xmath78 calculated degradation of luminosity due to different tilted angles of colliding beamstilted angles higher aspect ratio more luminosity reduction computed general luminosity formula off - centered beams understand luminosity scan two - scan thank w. kozanecki m. minty j. seeman u. wienands discussions | 0.308729 | 1,807 | 934 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,144 | top quark mass measurements from the tevatron using up to @xmath0 of data are presented .
prospects for combined tevatron measurements by the end of run ii are discussed .
= 11.6pt | discovered in 1995 by both cdf and d , the top quark is by far the heaviest known fundamental particle @xcite .
the mass of the top quark ( @xmath1 ) is of particular interest , as radiative contributions involving both the top quark and the putative higgs boson contribute to the mass of the w boson .
thus , the masses of the top quark , the higgs boson and the w boson are not three independent parameters in the standard model ( sm ) . when and if the higgs boson is discovered , precision measurements of the masses of the w boson and the top quark will help make a key test of the sm , helping to answer whether the new find is indeed the sm higgs boson or some other , new scalar particle .
in addition , the heavy mass of the top quark , near the electroweak scale , indicates that the top quark may play a role in helping theorists disentangle possible new sources of physics @xcite .
this letter describes measurements of the top quark mass from the cdf and d collaborations using up to @xmath0 of data collected in run ii at the tevatron .
top quarks at the tevatron are produced predominantly in pairs , and decay almost always in the sm to a w boson and a b quark .
the topology of @xmath2events depends on the subsequent decay of the two w bosons . in the dilepton channel ,
each w boson decays leptonically , to an electron or muon and a neutrino .
the dilepton channel has the lowest background and only two jets in the leading order @xmath2decay , but suffers from underconstrained kinematics due to the two escaping neutrinos , as well as from having the lowest branching fraction among all decay channels . in the all - hadronic channel , the two w bosons decay hadronically to quarks .
the all - hadronic channel has the largest branching fraction and no neutrinos , but also contains no charged lepton to distinguish it from the large qcd background . in the lepton+channel channel
, one w boson decays hadronically and the other leptonically .
though there is an undetected neutrino , the kinematics of the system are still overconstrained .
two tricks are used often in @xmath2mass analyses to increase the signal - to - background and improve systematics .
each @xmath2event contains two btags ; if the secondary vertices from the decay of metastable b hadrons can be identified , jets arising from b quarks can be distinguished from jets arising from light flavor quarks .
this significantly cuts down on the number of background events , and also helps to match the jets observed in the detector to the quarks at the hard scatter level .
lepton+jets and all - hadronic events also contain at least one hadronically decaying w boson . the narrow decay width and well known w boson mass in these events can be used to constrain , _ in situ _ , the largest systematic in top quark mass measurements , the calibration and response of calorimeters to hadronic particles , also known as the jet energy scale ( jes ) .
due to the underconstrained kinematics , measurements of @xmath1 in the dilepton channel must integrate over some unknown quantities .
the d experiment has two dilepton measurements , each using @xmath3 of data . in the matrix weighting method ,
each charged lepton - jet pairing is given a weight for the expectation to find , within experimental resolutions , the leptons with the measured energy , given a top quark mass and the unknown top and and anti - top @xmath4 .
the @xmath4 values are integrated over using parton distribution functions , and a likelihood fit yields @xmath1 = @xmath5 @xcite , with systematics that are dominated by the jet energy scale . in the neutrino weighting algorithm ( nwa ) , the unknown pseudorapidities of the two neutrinos are integrated over .
the solutions for a given top quark mass are weighted by the agreement with the missing transverse energy in the detector .
the mean and rms of the top quark mass weight distribution are used as estimators for the true top quark mass . with @xmath3 of data ,
d measures @xmath6 @xcite . the above two measurements , while largely correlated
, are not completely correlated . a combination using the blue technique @xcite yields @xmath7 @xcite
. cdf uses the nwa measurement in the dilepton channel with @xmath8 of data .
the most probable top quark mass , and not the mean , is taken as the first estimator ; the distribution is often rather asymmetric , so these are not necssarily the same quantity .
the second observable is the @xmath9 , the scalar sum of , lepton @xmath4 values and jet @xmath4 values .
cdf measures @xmath10 @xcite .
the kinematics in the lepton+jets and dilepton channel are overconstrained , so there is no need to integrate over unknown quantities .
the overconstrained kinematics are also used to select the single best assignment of jets to the quarks at the hard scatter
the single assignment most consistent with the @xmath2hypothesis is used .
cdf has two such measurements with @xmath8 of data .
a measurement in the all - hadronic channel uses a neural network to increase the s : b and reduce the qcd background .
in addition , the w mass constraint is used to calibrate the jes , yielding @xmath11 @xcite , where , as in all such measurements that contain an _ in situ _ jes calibration , the statistical uncertainty also includes a component for the jes systematic that now scales with @xmath12 .
a measurement in the lepton+jets channel yields @xmath13 @xcite , and also includes an _ in situ _ calibration .
cdf also has the first - ever analysis combining measurements of the top quark mass across different decay toplogies into the same likelihood .
more - traditional combinations must assume correlations for systematics between measurements , as well as assume gaussian behavior of the separate likelihoods . by combining the measurements into the same likelihood
, these assumptions are not needed .
the combination of cdf s lepton+jets and dilepton anaylses described above yields @xmath14 @xcite .
a different class of top quark mass analyses , called matrix element ( me ) analyses , try to extract as much information as possible from every event .
all jet - parton assignments consistent with b - tagging are used in the likelihood , which makes use of leading order theoretical predictions for how @xmath2events are produced and decayed , as given by the matrix element .
typically , leptons are assumed to be perfectly measured , as are jet angles .
the energies of the partons at the hard scatter level are encoded in transfer functions , which give the probability to observe a jet with energy @xmath15 given a parton with energy @xmath16 .
the transfer functions are needed since analyses measure jets in the detector , but the matrix element knows only how to describe events at the parton level . in typical me analyses , the probability to observe @xmath17 in the detector , given some top quark mass and jes in the detector , is given by : @xmath18 where p gives the probability to observe x in the detector , given some top quark mass ( and jes in the detector , if the measurement includes an _ in situ _ calibration ) .
n is a normalization term that includes effects of efficiency and acceptance , as well as the changing @xmath2production cross section as a function of @xmath1 .
the integral over @xmath19 is an integral over the parton - level phase space .
the matrix element m is the leading order matrix element for @xmath2production with partons @xmath16 , given some top quark mass .
the transfer functions w give the probability to observe a jet with energy @xmath15 given a parton energy @xmath16 ( and possibly the jet calibration in the detector ) . finally , there are two terms in @xmath20 that come from the parton distribution functions and give the probability to observe the two incoming partons with the appropriate energy .
cdf has a me element in the dilepton channel using @xmath0 .
the analysis uses a novel evolutionary neural network at the selection stage to improve the _ a priori _ statistical uncertainty on the top quark mass by 20% .
normal neural networks are trained only to minimize misclassifcation .
as such , they can be used only to distinguish signal and background , not to improve directly the expected uncertainty on a measurement .
the analysis measures @xmath1 = @xmath21 @xcite .
cdf has a me element analysis in the lepton+jets channel using @xmath8 .
the analysis differs from typical me analyses via the modification of the propagators in the matrix element to account for the imperfect assumptions about perfectly measured angles and intermediate particle masses that make the multi - dimensional integral tractable .
the analysis also makes a cut on the peak likelihood to remove both background events as well as poorly modeled signal events where the object in the detector do not match the assumed partons at the matrix element level .
the analysis includes an _ in situ _ jes calibration , and measures @xmath1 = @xmath22 @xcite .
d also has a me analysis using @xmath23 .
unlike most lepton+jet analyses , this analysis includes events with 0 b - tags .
the events are separated by charged lepton type ( electron vs muon ) .
including an _ in situ _ jes calibration , d measures @xmath1 = @xmath24 @xcite .
as run ii progresses at the tevatron , top quark mass measurements are rapidly approaching systematic limits .
a new set of analyses are emerging from the tevatron that make very different assumptions to measure the top quark mass , and as such are sensitive to very different systematic uncertainties .
in one such measurement , d measures the top quark mass via a measurement of the @xmath2pair production cross section .
top quark pairs at the tevatron are produced nearly at threshold , so the cross section depends strongly on the top quark mass .
the analysis depends on theoretical inputs to model this relationship ; using @xmath23 of data @xcite , d measures @xmath1 = @xmath25 using a @xmath26-@xmath27 curve from kidonakis and vogt . using a curve from cacciari et al .
gives @xmath1 = @xmath28 .
the world average tevatron top quark mass from the tevatron as of march 2007 , @xmath1 = @xmath29 @xcite , already comes close to being a 1% measurement , and does not include most of the analyses describe in this letter .
figure [ tevplot ] compares the world average with measurements from both experiments .
cdf has a new combination of its own analyses , yielding @xmath1 = @xmath30 @xcite , and expects by the end of run ii to have a cdf - only combination of top quark mass measurements with a precision better than 1% , as indicated in figure [ cdfplot ] .
i would like to thank all those in the cdf and d top groups who came before me in run i and run ii ( including all conveners ) for setting the bar so high for top quark mass measurements .
in addition , many thanks to the organizers of the la thuile 2008 conference for all their hard work .
99 abe , f. _ et al_. the cdf collaboration .
lett . , * 74 * , 2626 ( 1995 ) .
abachi , s. _ et al_. the d collaboration .
lett . , * 74 * , 2632 ( 1995 ) .
hill , christopher t. and parke , stephen j. phys .
d. , * 49 * , 4454 ( 1994 ) . the d collaboration .
d conference note 5463 ( 2007 ) . the d collaboration .
d conference note 5347 ( 2007 ) .
lyons , l. , gibaut , d. and clifford , p. nucl .
inst . meth .
, * a270 * , 110 ( 1988 ) . the d collaboration .
d conference note 5460 ( 2007 ) . the d collaboration .
d conference note 5362 ( 2007 ) . the d collaboration .
d conference note 5459 ( 2007 ) .
the cdf collaboration .
cdf conference note 9206 ( 2008 ) . the cdf collaboration .
cdf conference note 9130 ( 2008 ) .
the cdf collaboration .
cdf conference note 9196 ( 2008 ) . the cdf collaboration .
cdf conference note 9165 ( 2007 ) .
the cdf collaboration .
cdf conference note 9214 ( 2008 ) .
the cdf and d collaborations .
cdf conference note 8735 , d conference note 5378 ( 2007 ) . | discovered 1995 by cdf d top quark heaviest fundamental particle @xcite mass top quark @xmath1 interest radiative contributions top quark higgs boson contribute to mass w boson masses top quark higgs boson w boson not independent parameters in standard model higgs boson discovered precision measurements masses w boson top quark key test sm new find sm higgs boson or new scalar particle heavy mass top quark near electroweak scale indicates may theorists disentangle new sources physics @xcite letter describes measurements top quark mass cdf d collaborations using data run ii tevatron top quarks produced in pairs decay sm to w boson b quark topology depends on decay two w bosons dilepton channel each w boson decays leptonically to electron or muon neutrino dilepton channel lowest background two jets underconstrained kinematics two escaping neutrinos lowest branching fraction among decay channels all - hadronic channel two w bosons decay hadronically to quarksall - hadronic channel largest branching fraction no neutrinos no charged lepton qcd background lepton+channel channel one w boson decays hadronically other leptonically undetected neutrino kinematics overconstrained two tricks @xmath2mass analyses increase signal - to - background systematics each @xmath2event contains two btags secondary vertices decay b hadrons identified jets b quarks from light flavor quarks cuts background events jets detector quarks hard scatter level lepton+jets all - hadronic events contain one hadronically decaying w boson narrow decay width known w boson mass constrain top quark mass measurements calibration response calorimeters to hadronic particles jet energy scale underconstrained kinematics measurements dilepton channel integrate over unknown quantities d experiment two dilepton measurements @xmath3 data matrix weighting method each charged lepton - jet pairing weight find leptons measured energy top quark mass unknown top anti - top @xmath4@xmath4 values integrated parton distribution functions likelihood fit yields @xmath1 = @xmath5 @xcite systematics dominated jet energy scale neutrino weighting algorithm unknown pseudorapidities neutrinos integrated solutions top quark mass weighted by missing transverse energy detector mean rms mass weight distribution estimators true quark mass @xmath3 d measures @xmath6 @xcite measurements not completely combination yields @xmath7 @xcite cdf uses nwa measurement dilepton channel with @xmath8 data probable top quark mass first estimator distribution asymmetric not second observable @xmath9 scalar sum lepton jet @xmath4 values cdf measures @xmath10 @xcite kinematics lepton+jets dilepton channel overconstrained no need to integrate unknown quantities overconstrained kinematics select best assignment jets quarks assignment consistent with @xmath2hypothesis cdf two measurements with @xmath8 data measurement all - hadronic channel neural network increase s : b reduce qcd backgroundw mass constraint jes yielding @xmath11 @xcite statistical uncertainty includes component jes systematic scales with @xmath12 measurement in lepton+jets channel yields @xmath13 @xcite includes in situ calibration cdf first analysis combining measurements top quark mass across decay toplogies into same likelihood traditional combinations assume correlations gaussian behavior combining measurements same likelihood assumptions not needed combination of cdf s lepton+jets and dilepton anaylses yields @xmath14 @xcite top mass matrix element ( ) analyses information from every event jet - parton assignments consistent with b - tagging used in likelihood theoretical predictions for @xmath2events leptons measured jet angles energies of partons at hard scatter level encoded in transfer functions probability to observe jet with energy @xmath15 given parton with energy @xmath16 transfer functions needed analyses measure jets in detector matrix element events at parton leveltypical analyses probability observe @xmath17 detector top quark mass jes by @xmath18 p probability observe x top quark mass jes in situ calibration n normalization term effects efficiency acceptance changing @xmath2production cross section function @xmath1 integral over @xmath19 parton - level phase space matrix element m leading order for @xmath2production with partons @xmath16 top quark mass transfer functions w probability observe jet with energy @xmath15 parton energy @xmath16 jet calibration two terms in @xmath20 from parton distribution functions probability observe two incoming partons appropriate energy cdf has me element in dilepton channel @xmath0 analysis uses novel evolutionary neural network statistical uncertainty on top quark mass by 20% normal neural networks minimize misclassifcation distinguish signal background not improve expected uncertainty analysis measures @xmath1 = @xmath21 @xcite cdf me element analysis lepton+jets channel @xmath8 analysis differs modification propagators matrix element for imperfect assumptions about angles intermediate particle massesanalysis background events poorly modeled signal events partons matrix element level analysis includes in situ jes calibration measures @xmath1 = @xmath22 @xcite me analysis using @xmath23 includes events with 0 b - tags events separated by charged lepton type measures @xmath1 = @xmath24 @xcite run ii tevatron top quark mass measurements approaching limits analyses emerging different assumptions sensitive to systematic uncertainties d measures top quark mass via @xmath2pair production cross section top quark pairs tevatron produced at threshold cross section depends on top quark mass analysis depends on theoretical inputs relationship using @xmath23 data d measures @xmath1 = @xmath25 @xmath26-@xmath27 curve from kidonakis gives @xmath1 = @xmath28 world average tevatron top quark mass march 2007 @xmath1 = @xmath29 @xcite close 1% measurement include most analyses figure [ tevplot ] compares world average with measurements both experimentscdf new combination analyses yielding @xmath1 = @xmath30 @xcite expects end run ii cdf - only combination top quark mass measurements precision better than 1% figure cdfplot cdf d top groups run i ii conveners setting bar high top quark mass measurements thanks organizers la thuile 2008 conference hard work abe , f. cdf collaboration 74, 2626 ( 1995 ) abachi , s. d collaboration 74 2632 ( 1995 ) hill christopher t. parke , stephen j. 49 4454 ( 1994 ) d collaboration conference note 5463 ( 2007 ) note 5347 ( 2007 ) lyons l. gibaut d. clifford p. nucl a270 110 ( 1988 ) d collaboration conference note 5460 ( 2007 ) note 5362 ( 2007 5459 ( 2007 cdf collaboration conference note 9206 ( 2008 ) 9130 2008 9196 2008 9165 ( 2007 note 9214 ( 2008 ) cdf d collaborations cdf conference note 8735 d conference note 5378 ( 2007 ) | 0.437485 | 2,872 | 1,487 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,149 | we continue our study of the iib matrix model on fuzzy @xmath0 . especially in this paper
we focus on the case where the size of one of @xmath1 is different from the other . by the power counting and susy cancellation arguments
, we can identify the t hooft coupling and large @xmath2 scaling behavior of the effective action to all orders .
we conclude that the most symmetric @xmath0 configuration where the both @xmath3s are of the same size is favored at the two loop level .
in addition we develop a new approach to evaluate the amplitudes on fuzzy @xmath0 .
@xmath4 [ cols= " < " , ] the table [ tbl : wig ] shows that @xmath5 comes closer to @xmath6 as we increase @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
it seems a bit surprising that this approximation works so well .
it will be clarified later why is the case .
we expect that @xmath6 and @xmath5 are equal in the large @xmath7 and @xmath8 limit and that this approximation is exact in this limit .
moreover in the limit @xmath7 and @xmath9 the summations in ( [ fwig ] ) can be approximated by integrations .
as an example let us focus on the case @xmath10 .
after rescaling variables @xmath11 , @xmath12 , and so forth and taking the limit @xmath13 , we obtain ] @xmath14 where the wigner asymptotic estimate changes the 6j symbols as @xmath15 with @xmath16 we now understand why this is a good approximation . from ( [ f ] ) , we can observe that the leading contribution to @xmath17 comes from the uv regions , i.e. , @xmath18 .
in such a region , ( [ wigest ] ) is certainly valid .
we can apply this approximation to @xmath19 cases as well .
the novelty here is the appearance of the ratio @xmath20 : @xmath21 @xmath22 is symmetric under the exchange of @xmath23 with @xmath24 , which is consistent with the argument in the sub - section [ sec : tree1loop ] .
numerically we can check whether this approximation is valid or not .
we perform the multiple integration ( [ fint ] ) twice analytically and eventually by monte - carlo integration@xcite@xcite .
the result is shown in fig.[fig : fr ] , which indicates this approximation is in good agreement with the method in the section [ subsec : intapprx ] .
we make a comment on the difference between the methods in the sections [ subsec : asymptotic ] and [ subsec : intapprx ] .
the former method requires more machine power with increasing @xmath23 , while the latter does not in the fig .
[ fig : effactionvsr ] . ] .
so it seems that the latter is more economical and gives better results .
it is noted that this approach can not applies to the @xmath3 background case , that is , @xmath25 case .
setting @xmath26 , @xmath6 becomes@xcite @xmath27 rescaling variables @xmath28 and taking the large @xmath7 limit , we have @xmath29 the factor @xmath30 vanishes , while the integration part diverges because of the ir contributions , i.e. @xmath31 .
this implies that ( [ f2d ] ) is ill - defined , so that the naive approximation is not valid for the case @xmath25 .
this limitation can be explained from another point of view . in the @xmath26 case
dominant contributions to @xmath6 comes from ir regions , which is to say , @xmath32 .
in such a region ( [ wigest ] ) is no longer valid .
this approximation can not be applied to @xmath3 background . in this case , however , 6j symbols are well - approximated by 3j symbols @xmath33 in this sub - section , we determine the structure of the effective action to all orders . by naive power counting
we estimate the @xmath34-th loop contribution to be @xmath35 since we obtain a factor of @xmath36 from 6j symbols in the interaction vertices(see @xcite ) . here
we also assume that the @xmath0 background breaks susy softly , and so that leading corrections of each @xmath34-th loop cancel . under this assumption
it appears that the @xmath34-th loop contribution becomes @xmath37 .
in fact this order estimation is correct in the two loop corrections ( [ 2loop ] ) .
this argument allows us to define the t hooft coupling of @xmath38 gauge theory as @xmath39 to all orders and so that the @xmath40th loop contributions are @xmath41 .
the above arguments give the effective action to all orders in terms of the t hooft coupling @xmath42 n n , \label{effaction}\\ & & \mbox{with } \quad { \tilde{h}}_4(r , \lambda^2 ) = { f(r ) \over 2 } { \lambda^2 \over ( 2 \pi)^2 } + o(\lambda^4).\end{aligned}\ ] ] our remaining task is to minimize the effective action in terms of @xmath43 , and @xmath44 or equivalently @xmath45 .
we can fix the t hooft coupling @xmath46 by minimizing the effective action ( [ effaction ] ) independently of @xmath47 ( but dependent on @xmath23 ) . by solving @xmath48 for @xmath45
we find , up to two loop level , @xmath49 then the effective action becomes @xmath50 this can be evaluated numerically in two ways , i.e. , the methods in the section [ subsec : asymptotic ] and [ subsec : intapprx ] ( fig.[fig : effactionvsr ] ) .
: the solid circles are obtained by the method described in the section [ subsec : asymptotic ] , while the solid line is obtained by the method of the section [ subsec : intapprx].,height=302 ] it is found from this figure that the @xmath51 configuration minimizes the effective action , which means that the configuration of the same size @xmath1 is favored over the different size configurations .
also it is apparent from ( [ effaction ] ) that the case @xmath52 is favored .
it is the most important result of this paper that the same size @xmath0 configuration with the @xmath53 gauge group is singled out by the iib matrix model .
it is worth noting that the effective action blows up , as we decrease @xmath23 below @xmath51 .
this tendency is consistent with the result in @xcite , that is , the configuration of the 4d limit(@xmath51 ) is favored rather than that of the 2d limit(@xmath25 ) .
we expect that higher order corrections do not change this result by the argument in @xcite . | in this paper we have investigated the effective action of the iib matrix model on the fuzzy @xmath0 background up to two loop level .
in particular we have studied the case in which the size of one of @xmath0 is different from that of the other . by the power counting and susy cancellation arguments
, we can identify the t hooft coupling and the large @xmath2 scaling behavior of the effective actions to all orders . in the large @xmath2 limit quantum corrections of the effective action
are found to be @xmath54 .
this analysis will be applied to all order corrections of the effective action .
we have found the minimum point of the effective action at the two loop level , and concluded that the same size @xmath0 with @xmath55 gauge group is favored . in the previous paper@xcite
we have concluded that the iib matrix model favors the 4 dimensional spacetime(fuzzy @xmath0 ) rather than 2 and 6 dimensional spacetimes @xmath3 and @xmath56 . combining the previous work and
the results in this paper suggests that the iib matrix model singles out not only _ four dimensionality of spacetime _ but also _ more symmetric spacetime_. we hope this suggestion is one of general features of the iib matrix model .
in addition we have developed a approach to calculate the amplitudes on the fuzzy @xmath0 .
this approach can not be applied to the @xmath3 background(@xmath25 ) case .
we wish that extensions of this approach enables us to calculate amplitudes on other homogeneous spaces , such as @xmath57 and @xmath58@xcite .
99 t. banks , w. fischler , s.h .
shenker and l. susskind , _ m - theory as a matrix model : a conjecture _ , phys . rev .
* d55 * 5112 ( 1997 ) , hep - th/9610043 . n. ishibashi , h. kawai , y. kitazawa and a. tsuchiya , _ a large - n reduced model as superstring _ ,
nucl . phys . *
b498 * ( 1997 ) 467 , hep - th/9612115 .
a. connes , m. douglas and a. schwarz , _ noncommutative geometry and matrix theory : compactification on tori _ , jhep 9802 : 003.1998 , hep - th/9711162 . n. seiberg and e. witten , _ string theory and non - commutative geometry _ ,
jhep * 9909 * ( 1999 ) 032 , hep - th/9908142 .
myers,_dielectric - branes _ ,
jhep 9912 ( 1999 ) 022,hep - th/9910053 . a. y. alekseev , a. recknagel and v. schomerus , _ brane dynamics in background fluxes and noncommutative geometry _ ,
jhep * 0005 * ( 2000 ) 010 , hep - th/0003187 .
h. aoki , n. ishibashi , s. iso , h. kawai , y. kitazawa and t. tada , _ non - commutative yang - mills in iib matrix model _ , nucl .
* 565 * ( 2000 ) 176 , hep - th/9908141 .
m. li , _ strings from iib matrices _ , nucl.phys .
* b499 * ( 1997 ) 149,hep - th/961222 . n. ishibashi , s. iso , h. kawai and y. kitazawa , _ wilson loops in non - commutative yang - mills _
b573 * ( 2000 ) 573 , hep - th/9910004 .
d. j. gross , a. hashimoto and n. itzhaki , _ observables of non - commutative gauge theories _
, adv.theor.math.phys .
* 4 * ( 2000 ) 893,hep - th/0008075 .
s. minwalla , m.v .
raamsdonk and n. seiberg , _ non - commutative perturbative dynamics _ , jhep * 0002 * ( 2000 ) 020,hep - th/9912072 .
a. dhar and y. kitazawa , _ non - commutative gauge theory , open wilson lines and closed strings _ ,
jhep * 0108 * ( 2001 ) 044 , hep - th/0106217 .
h. aoki , s. iso , h. kawai , y. kitazawa and t. tada , _ space - time structures from iib matrix model _
phys . * 99 * , 713(1998 ) ; hep - th/9802085 .
jun nishimura , graziano vernizzi , _ spontaneous breakdown of lorentz invariance in iib matrix model _ jhep 0004:015,2000 : hep - th/0003223 , k.n .
anagnostopoulos , j. nishimura , _ new approach to the complex action problem and its application to a nonperturbative study of superstring theory _
phys.rev.d66:106008 : hep - th/0108041 j. nishimura and f. sugino , _ dynamical generation of four - dimensional space - time in iib matrix model _
, jhep * 0205 * ( 2002 ) 001 , hep - th/0111102 .
h. kawai , s. kawamoto , t. kuroki , t. matsuo , s. shinohara , _ mean field approximation of iib matrix model and emergence of four dimensional space - time_,nucl.phys .
b647 ( 2002 ) 153 - 189 : hep - th/0204240 ; _ improved perturbation theory and four - dimensional space - time in iib matrix model _ , prog.theor.phys . 109 ( 2003 )
115 - 132:hep - th/0211272 .
y. kitazawa , _ matrix models in homogeneous spaces _
, nucl phys . *
b642 * ( 2002 ) 210 , hep - th/0207115 .
t. a. imai , y. kitazawa , y. takayama and d. tomino , `` quantum corrections on fuzzy sphere , '' nucl .
b * 665 * , 520 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0303120 ] .
t. imai , y. kitazawa , y. takayama and d. tomino , `` effective actions of matrix models on homogeneous spaces , '' nucl .
b * 679 * , 143 ( 2004 ) arxiv : hep - th/0307007 . a new monte carlo event generator for high - energy physics . by s. kawabata ( kek , tsukuba ) .
kek - preprint-85 - 26 , jul 1985 .
44pp . published in comput.phys.commun.41:127,1986 also in tsukuba workshop : jlc 1990:239 - 249 ( qcd183:w82:1990 ) a new version of the multidimensional integration and event generation package bases / spring . by setsuya kawabata ( kek , tsukuba ) .
kek - preprint-94 - 197 , feb 1995 .
20pp . published in comput.phys.commun.88:309-326,1995 a. r. edmonds , _ angular momentum in quantum mechanics _ , princeton univ . press ( 1957 ) .
e. p. winger , group theory , academic press , new york ( 1959 ) g. ponzano , and t. regge , _ semiclassical limit of racah coefficients _ , spectroscopic group theoretical methods in physics ( 1968 ) | investigated effective action iib matrix model on fuzzy @xmath0 background two loop level studied case size @xmath0 different power counting cancellation arguments t hooft coupling large @xmath2 scaling behavior effective actions all orders large @xmath2 limit quantum corrections effective action @xmath54 analysis applied to all order corrections found minimum point effective action at two loop level same size @xmath0 with @xmath55 gauge group favored iib matrix model favors 4 dimensional spacetime @xmath0 2 6 dimensional spacetimes @xmath3 @xmath56 suggests matrix model singles four dimensionality spacetime symmetric spacetime hope developed approach to calculate amplitudes on fuzzy @xmath0 not applied to @xmath3 background(@xmath25 ) case wish extensions calculate amplitudes other homogeneous spaces @xmath57 @xmath58 t. banks fischler shenker l. susskind m - theory matrix model conjecture phys . rev . d55 * 5112 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9610043 n. ishibashi kawai kitazawa tsuchiya large - n reduced model as superstringb498 1997 467 hep th/9612115 connes douglas schwarz noncommutative geometry matrix theory compactification tori jhep 9802 003.1998/9711162 seiberg witten string theory non - commutative geometry 9909 1999 032/9908142 myers - branes 9912 1999 022/9910053 alekseev recknagel schomerus brane dynamics background fluxes noncommutative geometry jhep 0005 2000 ) 010 th/0003187 aoki ishibashi iso kawai kitazawa tada non - commutative yang - mills matrix model nucl 565 2000 ) 176 hep - th/9908141 li strings iib matrices nucl.phys b499 1997 149 th/961222 ishibashi iso kawai kitazawa wilson loops non - commutative yang - mills b573 2000 573 hep - th/9910004 gross hashimoto itzhaki non - commutative gauge theories adv.theor.math.phys 2000 ) 893 - th/0008075 minwalla raamsdonkseiberg non - commutative dynamics 0002 2000 020/9912072 dhar kitazawa non - commutative gauge theory open wilson lines closed strings 0108 2001 044/0106217 aoki iso kawai kitazawa tada space - time structures iib matrix model 99 713(1998 th/9802085 nishimura vernizzi spontaneous breakdown lorentz invariance matrix model 0004:015 th/0003223 anagnostopoulos nishimura approach complex action problem nonperturbative study superstring theory.rev.d66:106008 hep th/0108041 nishimura sugino dynamical generation four - space - time matrix model 0205 2002 001 th/0111102 kawai kawamoto kuroki matsuo shinohara field approximation matrix model four dimensional space - time.phys 2002 153 - 189 hep - th/0204240 improved perturbation theory four - dimensional space - time iib matrix model prog.theor.phys . 109 2003 115 - 132 th/0211272 kitazawa matrix models homogeneous spaces 2002 210 hep - th/0207115imai kitazawa takayama tomino quantum corrections fuzzy sphere nucl 665 520 2003 ) hep - th/0303120 tomino effective actions matrix models homogeneous spaces 679 143 2004 ) hep - th/0307007 new monte carlo event generator high - energy physics preprint-85 - 26 jul 1985 44pp comput.phys.commun.41:127,1986 workshop jlc 1990:239 - 249 multidimensional integration event generation package setsuya kawabata tsukuba preprint-94 - 197 feb 1995 20pp comput.phys.commun.88:309-326,1995 edmonds angular momentum quantum mechanics princeton univ . press 1957 ) winger group theory academic press new york 1959 ) ponzano t regge semiclassical limit racah coefficients spectroscopic group theoretical methods 1968 | 0.268953 | 1,782 | 951 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,165 | a new and efficient algorithm is presented for the calculation of the partition function in the @xmath0 ising model . as an example , we use the algorithm to obtain the thermal dependence of the magnetic spin susceptibility of an ising antiferromagnet for a @xmath1 square lattice with open boundary conditions .
the results agree qualitatively with the prediction of the monte carlo simulations and with experimental data and they are better than the mean field approach results . for the @xmath1 lattice , the algorithm reduces the computation time by nine orders of magnitude . * new algorithm for the computation of the partition function for the ising model on a square lattice * + _
k. malarz@xmath2 , m.s .
magdo - maksymowicz@xmath3 , a.z .
maksymowicz@xmath4 , b. kawecka - magiera@xmath4 and k. kuakowski@xmath4 _ @xmath4 department of applied computer science , faculty of physics and nuclear techniques , university of mining and metallurgy ( agh ) + al .
mickiewicza 30 , pl-30059 krakw , poland + @xmath3 department of mathematical statistics , agriculture university + al .
mickiewicza 21 , pl-31120 krakw , poland e - mail : @xmath5malarz@agh.edu.pl + march 17 , 2003 _ keywords : _ antiferromagnets ; ising model ; magnetic susceptibility ; mean field approximation ; world records . | a calculation of the partition function exactly in the thermodynamic limit is equivalent to knowledge of all equilibrium properties of a given system .
this task is usually beyond our horizon , except for some selected cases which we call `` trivial '' .
the ising model seems to be at the border of our possibilities since the beginning of the 20-th century . even for a finite system of @xmath6
spins our computational ability is limited by the number of the system configurations , which is @xmath7 .
here we describe a new algorithm , designed to improve the speed of the calculation of the partition function for a finite ising system . in the ising model
@xcite only two spin states are possible , say `` up '' and `` down '' ( @xmath8 ) .
the energy @xmath9 of a given spin configuration may be expressed in terms of the number @xmath10 of spins pointing `` up '' ( say @xmath11 ) and the number @xmath12 of anti - parallel bonds between the nearest neighbors @xmath13 : @xmath14 where @xmath15 denotes the exchange integral , @xmath16 is an external magnetic field , and @xmath17 the linear size of the lattice .
the partition function can be written as @xmath18,\ ] ] where @xmath19 is the number of lattice configurations with given numbers @xmath10 and @xmath12 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 is a boltzmann constant and @xmath22 is temperature .
then , the average value of any quantity @xmath23 may be calculated as @xmath24.\ ] ] the magnetic susceptibility per spin @xmath25 may be also expressed in the terms of @xmath10 , @xmath12 and @xmath17 : @xmath26=\beta[\langle ( 2n - l^2)^2\rangle-\langle 2n - l^2\rangle^2],\ ] ] where the index @xmath12 enters through the averaging procedure .
a computation of the partition function requires an evaluation of the histogram @xmath19 . tab .
[ tab_cpu_time ] shows the cpu time needed to check the numbers @xmath10 and @xmath12 of @xmath27 configurations of a @xmath1 large lattice on sgi 2800 machine .
a rough estimation of the cpu time necessary for full investigation of all of @xmath28 possible lattice configurations gives the value larger than four millions years what makes traditional / direct method practically useless . .
the cpu time necessary for investigation of @xmath27 different configurations of @xmath1 large 2d ising lattice on sgi 2800 machine . [ cols= " < ,
< , < , < , < , < , < " , ]
an effective way of generation @xmath29 is a successive merging of smaller lattices and their histograms , namely @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
however , the procedure requires storing information on the @xmath32 dependence not only on @xmath10 and @xmath12 , but also on @xmath33 the state of the @xmath34-sites - long lattice border . in fig .
[ fig_net](a ) a @xmath35-long bit - string equivalent to @xmath36 large array ( see fig .
[ fig_net](b ) ) is presented . for @xmath37
the bit - string corresponds to an integer number from the interval @xmath38 .
this correspondence allows to investigate all possible lattice configurations in a simple manner .
dark sites in fig .
[ fig_net](a ) correspond to the dark border of the lattice in fig .
[ fig_net](b ) , and they can be represented by an integer number @xmath39 .
the first four bits of @xmath40 ( marked as dark sites in fig .
[ fig_net](c ) ) allow to determine the additional number of anti - parallel bonds , created by merging two @xmath41 lattices together to get a @xmath42 lattice ( see fig . [
fig_net](f ) ) .
on the other hand , the last four digits of @xmath40 ( dark sites in fig .
[ fig_net](d ) ) are equivalent to the part of the border @xmath43 ( the dark sites in fig .
[ fig_net](g ) ) of @xmath42 lattice . in the next step ,
two @xmath44 lattices are merged to create the desired @xmath1 large lattice , as presented in fig . [ fig_net](h ) .
\(a ) described in sec .
[ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] + ( b ) described in sec .
[ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] ( c ) described in sec .
[ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] ( d ) described in sec .
[ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] + ( e ) described in sec . [ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] ( f ) described in sec .
[ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] ( g ) described in sec .
[ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] + ( h ) described in sec .
[ sec_algorithm].,title="fig : " ] histograms ( @xmath45 and @xmath46 ) for the lattices larger than @xmath41 may also be easily computed basing on @xmath47 : @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the additional number of anti - parallel bonds in the darker part of fig . [ fig_net](f ) and @xmath50 is combined from @xmath51 and @xmath52 . the histogram @xmath29 may be constructed in a similar way : @xmath53 and again @xmath54 is the number of anti - parallel bonds in the darker part of fig . [ fig_net](h ) . this procedure on sgi 2800 machine takes _ only _ 22 hours of the machine time instead of a few million years in case of the usage of the traditional / direct method .
successive merging may be repeated recursively to obtain the partition function for larger lattices . to evaluate the results obtained for the @xmath1 lattice , we show also the data obtained by the monte carlo simulations , the results of the mean field model , and last but not least the experimental data .
standard monte carlo metropolis algorithm @xcite is applied to determine the magnetic spin susceptibility of a @xmath55 ising lattice . after getting equilibrium , each point of the plot
is obtained as the time average over a thousand of time steps .
the mean field model is a direct generalization of the case of a ferromagnet .
namely , we solve numerically a set of two equations for two sublattices @xmath56 and @xmath57 : @xmath58 where @xmath59 . in this model ,
the curie temperature @xmath60 and the susceptibility @xmath25 is found as @xmath61 for a small value of applied magnetic field , e.g. @xmath62 .
the experimental data are collected from ref .
they concern two - dimensional ising antiferromagnets rb@xmath63cof@xmath64 and k@xmath63cof@xmath64 where @xmath0 .
the van vleck susceptibility is subtracted to obtain a pure spin contribution .
in fig . [ fig_omega ] the histogram @xmath29 obtained by means of the method described in sec . [ sec_algorithm ] is presented .
the numbers are available at our web page @xcite . the symbols on @xmath10-@xmath12 plane ( see fig .
[ fig_omega](a ) ) indicate @xmath65 pairs with non - zero values of @xmath29 . in fig .
[ fig_omega](b ) the number of configuration @xmath29 is presented . for fixed @xmath10 different symbols
correspond to different @xmath12 . in fig .
[ fig_chi ] we show the thermal dependence of the antiferromagnetic ( @xmath59 ) susceptibility , defined in eq . .
the curie temperature is assumed to be at the inflexion point of the curve , which is at the half of the peak height . below the curie temperature , the values of @xmath66 obtained with our new algorithm fit well the results obtained with the monte carlo results and the experimental data . above @xmath67 ,
the agreement is only qualititative .
we hope that it can be also quantitative if periodic boundary conditions are applied . however , in this case the lattice border is longer , and so is the computation time . still , even with the present method the qualitative accordance is better than the results of the mean field theory .
it would be of interest to apply the finite size scaling to our results to evaluate the critical properties of the system .
then , the results could be compared with other methods , e.g. the finite size scaling renormalization group @xcite or the phenomenological renormalization @xcite . for this purpose , however , periodic boundary conditions seem to be more appropriate as a starting point of the calculations .
the function @xmath68 , once known , can be easily used for the calculation of all equilibrium thermodynamic properties , for ferro- and antiferromagnets , various values of temperature and magnetic field .
the summation over @xmath10 and @xmath12 is much faster , than the summation over @xmath69 spin configurations .
the results can be relevant also for other applications of the ising model , e.g. for the percolation problem .
as for our knowledge , the partition function has never been calculated exactly for the lattice as large as @xmath1 . in principle , the algorithm can be applied to larger lattices , with a cost of more time and memory .
* acknowledgements .
* the authors are grateful to dietrich stauffer for valuable comments .
the simulations were carried out in ack - cyfronet - agh .
the machine time on sgi 2800 is financed by the polish state committee for scientific research ( kbn ) with grant no .
kbn / sgi2800/agh/077/2002 .
reichl , _ a modern course in statistical physics _ , j. wiley ( new york , 1998 ) .
heermann , _
computer simulation methods in theoretical physics _ , springer - verlag ( berlin , 1990 ) .
breed , k. gilijamse and a.r .
miedema , physica * 45 * ( 1969 ) 205 .
de oliveira , europhys .
* 20 * ( 1992 ) 621 .
nightingale , physica * a83 * ( 1976 ) 561 . | calculation of partition function in thermodynamic limit equivalent to knowledge equilibrium properties system task beyond horizon except selected cases trivial ising model border possibilities since 20-th century for finite system spins computational ability limited by number system configurations @xmath7 new algorithm speed calculation partition function for finite ising system in ising model two spin states possible up and down @xmath8 energy @xmath9 of spin configuration expressed in number of spins pointing up number of anti - parallel bonds between nearest neighbors exchange integral external magnetic field linear size of lattice partition function written as @xmath18 @xmath19 is number of lattice configurations with numbers boltzmann constant is temperature average value of quantity @xmath23 calculated as @xmath24. magnetic susceptibility per spin @xmath25 expressed in terms @xmath10 : @xmath26=\beta[\langle ( 2n - l^2)^2\rangle- 2n - l^2\rangle^2] index @xmath12 enters through averaging procedure computation partition function requires evaluation of histogram @xmath19tab_cpu_time shows time check numbers @xmath10 @xmath27 configurations @xmath1 large lattice on sgi 2800 machine rough estimation cpu time for investigation @xmath28 lattice configurations value larger than four millions years traditional method useless cpu time for investigation @xmath27 configurations @xmath1 large lattice on sgi 2800 machine effective generation @xmath29 is merging of smaller lattices @xmath30 @xmath31 requires storing information on @xmath32 dependence @xmath10 @xmath33 state @xmath34-sites - long lattice border @xmath35-long bit - string equivalent to @xmath36 large array presented for @xmath37 bit - string corresponds to integer number from interval @xmath38 allows investigate all lattice configurations dark sites in correspond to dark border of lattice represented by integer number @xmath39 first four bits of @xmath40 dark sites determine additional number of anti - parallel bonds created by merging two @xmath41 lattices @xmath42 latticelast four digits of @xmath40 ( dark sites in fig equivalent to border @xmath43 dark sites of @xmath42 lattice next two @xmath44 lattices merged to create desired @xmath1 large lattice presented in fig .(h ) (a ) described in sec _algorithm ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) histograms ( @xmath45 and @xmath46 ) for lattices larger than @xmath41 computed basing on @xmath47 : @xmath48 @xmath49 is additional number of anti - parallel bonds in darker part of fig .(f ) @xmath50 combined from @xmath51 and @xmath52 histogram @xmath29 constructed similar : @xmath53 and @xmath54 is number of anti - parallel bonds in darker part of fig . procedure on sgi 2800 machine takes 22 hours machine time instead of few million years traditional methodmerging repeated partition function for larger lattices results @xmath1 lattice data monte carlo simulations results mean field model experimental data monte carlo metropolis algorithm magnetic spin susceptibility of @xmath55 lattice after equilibrium each point plot obtained time average over thousand steps mean field model generalization ferromagnet solve two equations for sublattices @xmath56 @xmath57 : @xmath58 curie temperature @xmath60 susceptibility @xmath25 found as @xmath61 for small value applied magnetic field @xmath62 experimental data from concern two - antiferromagnets@xmath63cof@xmath64 van vleck susceptibility subtracted pure spin contribution fig ._omega histogram @xmath29 obtained method presented numbers available at web page @xcite symbols on @xmath10-@xmath12 plane indicate @xmath65 pairs with non - zero values of @xmath29 number of configuration @xmath29 presented fixed @xmath10 different symbols correspond to different @xmath12fig_chi ] thermal dependence antiferromagnetic ( @xmath59 ) susceptibility defined in eq . curie temperature at inflexion point curve half of peak height below curie temperature values @xmath66 new algorithm fit monte carlo results experimental data above @xmath67 agreement qualititative quantitative if periodic boundary conditions applied lattice border longer computation time present method qualitative accordance better than mean field theory apply finite size scaling evaluate critical properties system results compared with other methods finite size scaling renormalization group @xcite phenomenological renormalization @xcite periodic boundary conditions more appropriate starting point function @xmath68 used for calculation equilibrium thermodynamic properties ferro- antiferromagnets values temperature magnetic field summation over @xmath10 and @xmath12 faster than @xmath69 spin configurations results relevant for other applications ising model percolation problem partition function never calculated exactly for lattice as large as @xmath1 algorithm to larger lattices more time memory authors grateful to dietrich stauffer for comments simulations carried out in ack - cyfronet - agh .machine time sgi 2800 financed polish state committee scientific research grant sgi2800/agh/077/2002 reichl modern course statistical physics wiley new york 1998 heermann computer simulation methods springer - verlag berlin 1990 breed gilijamse miedema 45 1969 ) 205 oliveira europhys 20 1992 ) 621 nightingale a83 1976 ) 561 | 0.360619 | 2,331 | 1,165 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,172 | we detail an innovative new technique for measuring the 2-d velocity moments ( rotation velocity , velocity dispersion and gauss - hermite coefficients h@xmath0 and h@xmath1 ) of the stellar populations of galaxy halos using spectra from keck deimos multi - object spectroscopic observations .
the data are used to reconstruct 2-d rotation velocity maps . here
we present data for five nearby early - type galaxies to @xmath23 effective radii .
we provide significant insights into the global kinematic structure of these galaxies , and challenge the accepted morphological classification in several cases .
we show that between 13 effective radii the velocity dispersion declines very slowly , if at all , in all five galaxies .
for the two galaxies with velocity dispersion profiles available from planetary nebulae data we find very good agreement with our stellar profiles . we find a variety of rotation profiles beyond 1 effective radius , i.e rotation speed remaining constant , decreasing _ and _ increasing with radius .
these results are of particular importance to studies which attempt to classify galaxies by their kinematic structure within one effective radius , such as the recent definition of fast- and slow- rotator classes by the sauron project .
our data suggests that the rotator class may change when larger galacto - centric radii are probed .
this has important implications for dynamical modeling of early - type galaxies .
the data from this study are available on - line . -0.5
cm latexl-.36em.3ex-.15em t-.1667em.7ex-.125emx [ section ] [ firstpage ] galaxies : general , galaxies : individual ; ( ngc 821 ; ngc 1400 ; ngc 1407 ; ngc 2768 ; ngc 4494 ) , galaxies : kinematics and dynamics , galaxies ; structure , stellar dynamics , techniques ; spectroscopic , | since the pioneering work of simkin ( 1974 ) , major advances in the measurement of stellar orbits in early - type galaxies have been made . the first quantities to be measured were the line - of - sight rotation velocity ( v@xmath3 ; which can be considered a measure of ordered motion within a galaxy ) and velocity dispersion ( @xmath4 ; a measure of the random motions ) . by combining these two measures with photometric ellipticity ( @xmath5 ) it was possible to probe the anisotropy of stellar orbits in galaxies ( binney 1978 ) .
further progress was made in this field when , in the 1980s , bender ( 1988 ) showed that although the isophotal shapes of early - type galaxies were well described by ellipses , small variations from ellipticity could be used to categorise them as either ` boxy ' or ` discy ' , and that these variations relate directly to the stellar orbital isotropy .
the combination of surface photometry and detailed kinematics were therefore demonstrated to provide significant insights into the global structure of galaxies .
more recently , higher order moments of the line - of - sight velocity distribution ( losvd ) have been measured ( e.g. bender 1990 ; rix & white 1992 ; gerhard 1993 ; van der marel & franx 1993 ) .
these characterise deviations from a pure gaussian shape , e.g. skewed and symmetric deviations , denoted h@xmath0 and h@xmath1 respectively .
such parameters can indicate kinematic substructures , such as embedded stellar discs .
the development of integral field units ( ifus ) , such as the sauron instrument , have given new impetus to this field , as these provide 2-d maps of the losvd .
this allows the definition and estimation of a number of important new parameters that can be averaged over the surface of a galaxy in a self - consistent way .
perhaps the most important of these is the ` spin ' parameter ( @xmath6 ) which is a proxy for the projected angular momentum per unit mass .
applied to the sauron galaxy sample of 48 early - type galaxies , it was used to show that a dichotomy exists between ` slow- ' and ` fast- ' rotators ( emsellem et al . 2007 ) .
trends between photometric and kinematic axis ratios and position angles have also been shown to vary with @xmath6 ; with slow - rotators often exhibiting strong misalignments .
these observations provide new clues to the formation mechanisms of these differing galaxy types ( krajnovi et al .
2008 ; cappellari et al . 2007 ; thomas et al . 2007 ) .
statler & smecker - hane ( 1999 ) used a different approach to building 2-d maps of the losvd in ngc 3379 . using long - slit spectroscopy along four position angles
, they were able to reconstruct a model of the 2-d kinematics by making suitable interpolations between their observed axes . however , such studies are rare due to the large amount of telescope time required to observe multiple position angles out to large radii . despite these advances ,
most observations typically reach to less than one effective radius , with only a handful of studies extending this coverage up to 23 r@xmath7 ( but see saglia et al .
1993 ; graham et al . 1998 ; mehlert et al .
2000 ; proctor et al .
2005 ; sanchez - blazquez et al . 2006 ; forestell & gebhardt 2008 ) .
however , such outer regions potentially provide key information regarding the physical properties of galaxies .
for example , radii within 1 r@xmath7 only sample 50% of the baryonic mass and @xmath2 10% of the angular momentum of an idealised galaxy with an r@xmath8 like light profile and a flat rotation profile .
the situation is even worse when considering the distribution of total galaxy mass ( including dark matter ) .
for instance , the simulations of dekel et al .
( 2005 ) show that only @xmath25% of the total mass is contained within 1 r@xmath7 ( see also mamon & lokas 2005 ) .
furthermore , the signatures of some formation mechanisms only become apparent at large galacto
( e.g. mcmillan , athanassoula & dehnen 2007 ; weil & hernquist 1996 ) .
a means to probe the kinematics in the outer regions of early - type galaxies , and hence include a significant fraction of a galaxies angular momentum and mass , is therefore highly desirable .
in this paper we measure stellar losvds from deep multi - object spectroscopic observations and develop a new technique for their analysis .
specifically , we measure rotation velocity , velocity dispersion and the gauss - hermite coefficients h@xmath0 and h@xmath1 , out to @xmath23 r@xmath7 in five nearby early - type galaxies . by extending the region studied to such radii we encompass more than 85% of the baryonic mass , 30% of the angular momentum and 15% of the total mass , a significant increase in the fractions so surveyed in galaxies . to achieve this we exploit the large aperture of the keck telescope , the high sensitivity of the deimos instrument at 8500 @xmath9 and the strong calcium triplet absorption features at these wavelengths .
even with this configuration , exposures of @xmath2 2 hours are required for our analysis .
+ the paper is organised as follows : in section [ odr ] we outline the observations and data reductions , detailing the technique by which we extract the host galaxy spectra . in section
[ anal ] we outline our new kinematic analysis technique .
results are presented in section [ results ] .
we discuss our findings in section [ discuss ] , and present our conclusions in section [ concs ] .
the galaxies in our sample were selected with the intention of obtaining spectra of their globular clusters ( gcs ) .
the galaxies are all nearby , early - types with moderately rich gc systems .
the selection also had the requirement that recession velocities were such that the calcium triplet lines would not generally be adversely affected by strong sky lines .
the main science goal was to obtain gc kinematics , and hence probe the mass profile of their host galaxy halos .
initial results for ngc 1407 from the 2006 nov . run
have recently been reported in romanowsky et al .
( 2008 ) .
the data used in this work are from three observing runs using deimos on the keck-2 telescope .
the first observing run was carried out in 2006 nov . using the 1200 l / mm grating centered at @xmath27500 @xmath9 and a 1 arcsec slit .
this allows coverage of the calcium triplet at 8498 , 8542 and 8662 @xmath9 at a resolution of @xmath21.5 @xmath9 .
the second run was carried out in 2007 nov . and the third in 2008 april , both using the same instrument setup as the first run .
seeing was @xmath20.5 to 0.8 arcsec on all nights .
a total of five galaxies were observed ( ngc 821 , ngc 1400 , ngc 1407 , ngc 2768 and ngc 4494 ) . between two and six independent masks
were observed per galaxy and the 16 x 5 arcmin field - of - view allowed the observation of @xmath280 - 120 spectra in each mask .
however , only @xmath220% of these were at radii from which the signal of the background host galaxy was sufficient for the extraction of spectra ( see table [ fits ] ) .
[ thumbnails ] shows the positions of slits from which host galaxy spectra were extracted .
we note that it was only possible to measure recession velocities in some of the outermost slits , i.e. velocity dispersion and higher order moments are not presented for some of the outermost positions . | simkin 1974 ) advances in measurement stellar orbits in early - type galaxies first quantities measured were line - of - sight rotation velocity@xmath3 ordered velocity dispersion @xmath4 combining with photometric ellipticity @xmath5 ) anisotropy of stellar orbits binney 1978 ) progress 1980s bender 1988 ) showed isophotal shapes early - galaxies small variations from ellipticity as boxy or discy ' variations relate to stellar orbital isotropy surface photometry detailed kinematics insights into global structure galaxies higher order moments of line - of - sight velocity distribution losvd ) measured bender 1990 rix & white 1992 gerhard 1993 van der marel franx 1993 characterise deviations from gaussian shape skewed symmetric deviations denoted h@xmath0 and h@xmath1 parameters indicate kinematic substructures embedded stellar discs development of integral field units sauron instrument impetus provide 2-d maps of losvd definition estimation of important new parameters averaged over surface galaxy important ` spin ' parameter ( @xmath6 ) proxy for projected angular momentum per unit masssauron galaxy sample 48 early - type galaxies dichotomy between slow- fast- rotators ( emsellem 2007 ) photometric kinematic axis ratios position angles vary with @xmath6 slow - rotators misalignments observations provide clues to formation mechanisms galaxy types ( krajnovi 2008 cappellari 2007 thomas 2007 statler & smecker - hane 1999 different approach 2-d maps losvd in ngc 3379 long - slit spectroscopy four position angles model 2-d kinematics interpolations between axes studies rare large telescope time observations reach less than one effective radius handful of studies coverage up to 23 r@xmath7 saglia 1993 graham 1998 mehlert 2000 proctor 2005 sanchez blazquez 2006 forestell 2008 outer regions provide key information physical properties galaxies radii within 1 r@xmath7 sample 50% baryonic mass @xmath2 10% angular momentum idealised galaxy r@xmath8 light profile flat rotation profile worse distribution total galaxy mass dark matter simulations dekel et al . 2005 show only @xmath25% total mass within 1 r@xmath7 mamon lokas 2005signatures formation mechanisms apparent at large galacto mcmillan athanassoula dehnen 2007 weil hernquist 1996 probe kinematics outer regions early - type galaxies include significant angular momentum mass desirable paper measure stellar losvds from deep multi - object spectroscopic observations develop new technique analysis measure rotation velocity velocity dispersion gauss - hermite coefficients h@xmath0 h@xmath1 to @xmath23 r@xmath7 in five nearby early - type galaxies extending region to 85% baryonic mass 30% angular momentum 15% total mass increase fractions surveyed galaxies exploit large aperture keck telescope high sensitivity deimos instrument at 8500 @xmath9 strong calcium triplet absorption features wavelengths exposures of @xmath2 2 hours required paper organised section [ odr ] observations data reductions technique host galaxy spectra anal new kinematic analysis technique results discuss findings conclusions galaxies sample selected obtaining spectra globular clusters ) galaxies nearby early - types with moderately rich gc systems selection recession velocities calcium triplet lines not affected by strong sky linesscience goal obtain gc kinematics probe mass profile host galaxy halos results ngc 1407 2006 nov run reported in romanowsky et al . 2008 data from three runs deimos keck-2 telescope first run 2006 nov 1200 l / mm grating @xmath27500 @xmath9 1 arcsec slit coverage calcium triplet at 8498 8542 8662 @xmath9 resolution @xmath21.5 @xmath9 second run 2007 nov third 2008 april same instrument setup @xmath20.5 to 0.8 arcsec all nights five galaxies observed ngc 821 1400 1407 2768 4494 two six masks observed per galaxy 16 x 5 arcmin field - of - view @xmath280 - 120 spectra each mask only @xmath220% at signal sufficient for extraction spectra table positions slits spectra extracted recession velocities outermost slits velocity dispersion higher order moments not presented outermost positions | 0.268359 | 1,758 | 930 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,180 | to understand the structure of hadrons and their production mechanisms , it is very important to be able to identify their quantum numbers . for investigating the spin and parity quantum numbers of @xmath0 and @xmath1 baryons , in particular
, it is very important to understand strong interactions in the strangeness sector . at present ,
such quantum numbers are known for only a few of the @xmath0 baryons , and even the parity of the ground state @xmath2 has never been measured . in this article , we present a novel , model - independent way to determine the parity of @xmath0 baryons solely based on symmetry considerations for the hadronic reaction @xmath3 . | regarding the production of strange baryons , the existing extensive studies on the production of @xmath4 and @xmath5 hyperons , which have strangeness @xmath6 , have accumulated many data for various physical quantities that are relevant for describing the production mechanisms of @xmath6 baryons and the parameters of nucleon resonances . by contrast , the production of multi - strangeness @xmath0 ( @xmath7 ) and @xmath1 ( @xmath8 ) baryons has not been studied very often .
one reason is that the processes for producing multi - strangeness baryons from non - strangeness initial states have very small cross sections . as a result ,
no significant information on multi - strangeness baryons has been added during the past two decades @xcite .
recently , however , the interest in multi - strangeness physics is increasing .
for example , the major research programs at j - parc , which has started its operation recently , include strangeness physics @xcite .
since the j - parc facility can provide energetic kaon beams , the production of @xmath2 should be possible .
furthermore , the planned upgrade of the kaon - beam energy will allow the production of @xmath0 resonances , thus providing a new turning point in the study of multi - strangeness baryons .
furthermore , the @xmath9anda collaboration has a plan to investigate the @xmath10 reaction at fair @xcite , and the clas collaboration at jlab has established the feasibility of investigating @xmath0 spectroscopy via photoproduction reactions like @xmath11 and @xmath12 @xcite .
the reported data for the total and differential cross sections as well as the @xmath13 and @xmath14 invariant mass distributions for the @xmath11 reaction @xcite are the first data measured for the exclusive photoproduction of the @xmath0 .
recent theoretical investigations of this reaction can be found in refs .
@xcite .
the investigation of multi - strangeness baryons will shed light on our understanding of baryon structure by allowing us to distinguish various hadron models .
( see , for example , ref .
@xcite and references therein . )
however , this requires knowledge of the quantum numbers of the baryons since the spin and parity quantum numbers heavily depend on the internal structure of the baryons and the underlying dynamics .
it is of crucial importance , therefore , to identify the quantum numbers of the observed @xmath0 baryons .
however , identifying the spin and parity quantum numbers of multi - strangeness baryons is very challenging .
for example , the fact that the @xmath15 baryon has spin-3/2 was only recently confirmed by experiment @xcite , more than 40 years after the discovery of the @xmath16 baryon @xcite . for the cascade baryons , only for three states , @xmath2 , @xmath17 , and @xmath18 , of the eleven cascade states reported in pdg @xcite , the spin and parity quantum numbers are known . in a recent report @xcite , the babar collaboration claimed that the @xmath19 has @xmath20 .
what is surprising is that the parity of the cascade ground state @xmath2 has never actually been measured ; the positive parity quoted by the pdg @xcite is taken from quark - model calculations . in this article
, we describe a novel , _ model - independent _ way to determine the parity of spin-1/2 @xmath0 baryons . to this end
, we consider the reaction , @xmath21 , where the arguments @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , and @xmath25 stand for the four - momenta of the respective particles . although the production mechanisms are highly model - dependent @xcite , our method is based on bohr s theorem @xcite and thus a direct consequence of the rotation and parity - inversion symmetries of the reaction amplitudes @xcite , and , therefore , model - independent .
furthermore , the cross section for this reaction is large enough to be measured experimentally .
when the produced @xmath0 has spin-1/2 , the most general spin structure of the reaction amplitude constrained by symmetry principles for the reaction of @xmath3 can be written as @xmath26 where @xmath27 and @xmath28 , respectively , apply to @xmath0 having positive or negative parity .
the amplitude functions @xmath29 are functions of mandelstam variables .
the unit vectors @xmath30 and @xmath31 are defined as @xmath32 , respectively . without loss of generality
, we may choose the coordinate systems such that @xmath33 is the unit vector along the positive @xmath34-axis and @xmath31 along the positive @xmath35-axis so that @xmath30 is the unit vector along the positive @xmath36-axis .
the reaction plane is then defined by the two vectors @xmath37 and @xmath30 .
this enables us to write the reaction amplitudes in a generic manner as @xmath38 where @xmath39 is the @xmath40 unit matrix . depending on the parity of @xmath0 , either @xmath41 or @xmath42 .
the unpolarized cross section is then given by @xmath43 the most interesting spin observable related to the parity of the @xmath0 is the ( diagonal ) spin - transfer coefficient @xmath44 defined by @xmath45 for @xmath46 . in terms of the cross sections ,
this corresponds to @xmath47 - \left[d\sigma_i^{}(+-)+d\sigma_i^{}(-+)\right ] } { \left[d\sigma_i^{}(++ ) + d\sigma_i^{}(--)\right ] + \left[d\sigma_i^{}(+-)+d\sigma_i^{}(-+)\right ] } , \label{eq:4a}\ ] ] where @xmath48 stands for the differential cross section with the polarization of the target nucleon and of the produced @xmath0 along the @xmath49-direction .
the first and second @xmath50 arguments of @xmath48 indicate the parallel ( @xmath51 ) or anti - parallel ( @xmath52 ) spin - alignment along the @xmath49-direction of the target nucleon and produced @xmath0 , respectively . the spin - transfer coefficient @xmath44 should be a function of the energy and scattering angle , in general .
however , because of the spin structure of the amplitude , we can see that @xmath53 is constant and @xmath54 where @xmath55 is the parity of the produced @xmath0 .
this is a direct consequence of the spin structures of the reaction amplitudes as exhibited in eq .
( [ eq:1 ] ) , which is a realization of reflection symmetry in the reaction plane .
therefore , the measurement of @xmath53 will directly determine the parity of the @xmath0 . another way to determine
the parity of spin-1/2 @xmath0 baryon is to use two single - polarization observables , namely , the target - nucleon asymmetry @xmath56 and the recoil-@xmath0 asymmetry @xmath57 , which are defined by @xmath58 + 2\,\mbox{im } \left[m_j m^*_k \right ] , \\ \frac{d\sigma}{d\omega}p_i & \equiv & \frac{1}{2}\,\mbox{tr}\left ( m m^\dagger \sigma_i \right ) = 2\,\mbox{re}\left[m_0m^*_i \right ] - 2\,\mbox{im}\left[m_j m^*_k \right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the subscripts @xmath59 run cyclically . then the spin structures of the amplitudes of eq .
( [ eq:1 ] ) immediately give @xmath60 , \qquad \frac{d\sigma}{d\omega}\left ( t_y - p_y\right ) = 0 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] for positive - parity @xmath0 and @xmath61,\end{aligned}\ ] ] for negative - parity @xmath0 .
this can be used to determine the parity of the @xmath2 unless @xmath62 .
in summary , we have studied the spin structure of the production amplitudes in the reaction of @xmath3 .
we found that the spin - transfer coefficient @xmath53 , which is a double - polarization observable , can give a direct measurement of the parity of the @xmath0 baryon .
furthermore , the combinations of the two single - polarization observables , the target asymmetry @xmath63 and the recoil asymmetry @xmath64 , can give another way to check the parity of the produced @xmath0 . since the @xmath0 is self - analyzing
, these asymmetries can be measured by preparing polarized nucleon targets at the current facilities like the j - parc .
although we considered the parity of spin-1/2 @xmath0 baryons in this article , our discussion can be generalized to the @xmath0 of higher spin and to the polarization observables in @xmath0 photoproduction @xcite .
similar relations can be found for the determination of the parity of the @xmath1 baryons as well .
this work was partly supported by the national research foundation of korea funded by the korean government ( grant no .
nrf-2011 - 220-c00011 ) . the work of k.n .
was also supported partly by the ffe grant no .
41788390 ( cosy-058 ) . | production strange baryons studies on @xmath4 @xmath5 hyperons accumulated data for physical quantities production mechanisms @xmath6 baryons parameters nucleon resonances production multi - strangeness @xmath0 @xmath1 ) baryons not studied often processes from non - states small cross sections no significant information added past two decades interest in multi - strangeness physics increasing research programs at j - parc include strangeness physics j - facility energetic kaon beams production of @xmath2 possible planned upgrade kaon - beam energy production @xmath0 resonances new turning point in study multi - strangeness baryons @xmath9anda collaboration investigate @xmath10 reaction @xcite clas collaboration jlab feasibility investigating @xmath0 spectroscopy via photoproduction reactions @xmath11 @xmath12 @xcite data total differential cross sections @xmath13 @xmath14 invariant mass distributions for @xmath11 reaction first data for exclusive photoproduction of @xmath0 recent theoretical investigations in refs . @xciteinvestigation of multi - strangeness baryons understanding baryon structure hadron models ref @xcite requires knowledge quantum numbers baryons spin parity depend on internal structure dynamics to identify quantum numbers of observed @xmath0 baryons identifying spin parity numbers baryons challenging @xmath15 baryon has spin-3/2 recently confirmed by experiment @xcite 40 years after discovery @xmath16 baryon for cascade baryons three states @xmath2 @xmath18 of eleven states spin and parity quantum numbers known report babar collaboration claimed @xmath19 has @xmath20 parity of cascade ground state @xmath2 never measured positive parity taken from quark - model calculations novel model - independent way to determine parity of spin-1/2 @xmath0 baryons consider reaction , @xmath21 , arguments @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 stand for four - momenta of particles production mechanisms model - dependent our method based on bohr s theorem @xcite direct consequence of rotation parity - inversion symmetries of reaction amplitudes model - independent cross section reaction measured experimentally @xmath0 spin-1/2 general spin structure reaction amplitude symmetry @xmath3 written as @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 apply to @xmath0 positive or negative parity amplitude functions @xmath29 mandelstam variables unit vectors @xmath30 @xmath31 defined as @xmath32 coordinate systems @xmath33 vector @xmath34-axis @xmath31 @xmath35-axis @xmath30 @xmath36-axis reaction plane defined by vectors @xmath37 and @xmath30 reaction amplitudes as @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 unit matrix parity @xmath0 @xmath41 or @xmath42 unpolarized cross section by @xmath43 spin observable parity diagonal spin - transfer coefficient @xmath44 defined by @xmath45 for @xmath46cross sections corresponds @xmath47 - \left[d\sigma_i^{}(+-)+d\sigma_i^{}(-+)\right\left[d\sigma_i^{}(++ ) + d\sigma_i^{}(--)\right ](+-)+d\sigma_i^{}(-+)\right @xmath48 differential cross section polarization target nucleon produced @xmath0 @xmath49-direction first second @xmath50 arguments @xmath48 indicate parallel or anti - parallel spin - alignment @xmath49-direction target nucleon produced @xmath0 spin - transfer coefficient @xmath44 function of energy scattering angle spin structure amplitude @xmath53 constant @xmath54 @xmath55 parity produced @xmath0 consequence of spin structures reaction amplitudes eq . reflection symmetry reaction plane measurement of @xmath53 parity @xmath0determine parity spin-1/2 @xmath0 baryon two single - polarization observables target - nucleon asymmetry @xmath56 and recoil-@xmath0 asymmetry @xmath57 defined by @xmath58 + 2{d\sigma}{d\omega}p_i\frac{1}{2} ) = 2 - 2 subscripts @xmath59 run cyclically spin structures amplitudes eq give @xmath60 {d\sigma}{d\omega}\left ( t_y - p_y\right ) = 0 for positive - parity @xmath0 and @xmath61 for negative - parity @xmath0 determine parity @xmath2 unless @xmath62 studied spin structure production amplitudes reaction @xmath3 spin - transfer coefficient @xmath53 double - polarization observable measurement parity @xmath0 baryoncombinations single - polarization observables target asymmetry @xmath63 recoil asymmetry @xmath64 check parity @xmath0 @xmath0 self - analyzing asymmetries measured preparing polarized nucleon targets at facilities j - parc parity spin-1/2 @xmath0 baryons to @xmath0 higher spin polarization observables @xmath0 photoproduction @xcite similar relations parity @xmath1 baryons work supported by national research foundation korea funded korean government grant nrf-2011 - 220-c00011 ) supported ffe grant no . 41788390 | 0.34394 | 2,126 | 1,129 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,183 | we carried out a systematic analysis of time lags between x - ray energy bands in a large sample ( 32 sources ) of unabsorbed , radio quiet active galactic nuclei ( agn ) , observed by xmm-_newton_. the analysis of x - ray lags ( up to the highest / shortest frequencies / time - scales ) , is performed in the fourier - frequency domain , between energy bands where the soft excess ( soft band ) and the primary power law ( hard band ) dominate the emission .
we report a total of 15 out of 32 sources displaying a high frequency soft lag in their light curves .
all 15 are at a significance level exceeding 97 per cent and 11 are at a level exceeding 99 per cent . of these soft lags ,
7 have not been previously reported in the literature , thus this work significantly increases the number of known sources with a soft / negative lag .
the characteristic time - scales of the soft / negative lag are relatively short ( with typical frequencies and amplitudes of @xmath0 hz and @xmath1 s , respectively ) , and show a highly significant ( @xmath2 ) correlation with the black hole mass .
the measured correlations indicate that soft lags are systematically shifted to lower frequencies and higher absolute amplitudes as the mass of the source increases .
to first approximation , all the sources in the sample are consistent with having similar mass - scaled lag properties .
these results strongly suggest the existence of a mass - scaling law for the soft / negative lag , that holds for agn spanning a large range of masses ( about 2.5 orders of magnitude ) , thus supporting the idea that soft lags originate in the innermost regions of agn and are powerful tools for testing their physics and geometry .
[ firstpage ] galaxies : active , galaxies : nuclei , x - rays : galaxies | the observed similarities in the timing properties of different black hole ( bh ) systems suggest that the same physical mechanism is at work in sources spanning a wide range of masses ( e.g. uttley et al 2005 , mchardy et al 2006 ) .
this observational fact represents an important achievement in the context of the theory of unification of bh accretion . a breakthrough in this respect
was the discovery of the mass - scaling law that regulates the characteristic time - scales of variability , identified with the high frequency break in the power spectral density function ( psd ) .
this relation holds for objects of widely different size ( i.e. over about eight order of magnitudes in mass , from bh x - ray binaries , bhxb , up to active galactic nuclei , agn , mchardy et al 2006 , koerding et al 2007 ) and is in agreement with expectations from standard accretion disk models , whereby all the characteristic time - scales depend linearly on the bh mass , @xmath3 ( e.g. shakura & sunyaev 1973 , treves et al 1988 ) . +
another fundamental analogy emerges from the comparison of time lags between x - ray energy bands .
hard / positive lags ( i.e. hard x - ray variations lagging soft x - ray variations ) are generally observed in both bhxbs and agn , and can be interpreted in terms of propagation of mass accretion rate fluctuations in the disc ( kotov et al 2001 and arvalo & uttley 2006 ) .
those lags are usually detected at relatively low fequencies ( i.e. below the psd high frequency break ) .
+ on the other hand , a relatively new and interesting perspective comes from the study of high frequency , soft / negative lags ( i.e. soft x - ray band variations lagging hard x - ray band variations ) .
the first significant detection of a soft / negative lag in agn light curves was reported in the narrow line seyfert 1 ( nlsy1 ) galaxy 1h0707 - 495 ( fabian et al 2009 , zoghbi et al 2010 ) , and interpreted as the signature of relativistic reflection which `` reverberates '' in response to continuum changes after a time equal to the light - crossing time from the source to the reflecting region .
a different interpretation has been proposed in terms of a complex system of scatterers / absorbers located close to the line of sight , but at hundreds of gravitational radii , @xmath4 , from the central source ( miller et al 2010 ) , thus requiring us to have a special line of sight to the source .
+ subsequently , soft lags have been observed in several other sources ( e.g. tripathi et al 2011 , emmanoulopoulos et al 2011 , zoghbi & fabian 2011 ) .
one of the largest - mass sources ( @xmath5 ) showing a soft / negative lag is pg 1211 + 143 ( de marco et al 2011 ) , whose lag spectrum appears `` shifted '' by about one order of magnitude ( with the lag frequency , @xmath6 , and amplitude , @xmath7 , found at @xmath8hz and @xmath9 s , respectively ) with respect to those measured in other low mass sources ( i.e. @xmath10hz and @xmath11 s , emmanoulopoulos et al 2011 ) . in de marco et al ( 2011 ) we speculated that this difference could be simply explained if the time - scales in pg 1211 + 143 are scaled - up by the bh mass , estimated to be about 10 - 100 times the mass of the other agn for which x - ray lags have been recorded so far . in this paper
we explore this hypothesis , by studying the properties of the lag frequency spectrum in a large sample of sources , spanning a wide range of masses ( about 2.5 decades ) .
the time - scales of detected soft / negative lags are then used to study correlations with relevant parameters , such as luminosity and bh mass .
the sources analysed are extracted from the _ caixavar _ sample a subsample of the caixa sample by bianchi et al ( 2009a ) presented in ponti et al ( 2012 ) , which includes all the well - exposed , x - ray unobscured ( @xmath12@xmath13 ) , radio quiet agn observed by xmm-_newton _ in targeted observations as of june 2010 .
we considered all the sources having at least one observation with a longer than 40 ks exposure ( 41 sources ) , and selected those with published black hole mass , @xmath3 , estimates ( 39 sources ) .
finally , we selected all the sources showing significant variability in their light curves . to this aim we made use of the excess variance estimates provided by ponti et al ( 2012 ) , computed by sampling the 2 - 10 kev light curve of each source in 40 ks segments (
note that also single - interval measurements were considered ) , and assuming a time resolution of 250 s. all the sources having excess variance different from zero at @xmath142@xmath15 confidence level were included in our sample , i.e. excluding all the sources consistent with having constant flux on the time - scales of interest for this work ( @xmath16ks ) . with the latter selection
our final sample was reduced to a total of 32 sources . for each source all the available observations in the xmm-_newton _ archive have been used in our analysis , apart from those highly corrupted by background flares . in the computation of the lag - frequency spectra ,
multiple observations have been combined to obtain better statistics .
+ only data from the epic - pn camera were used , because of its high effective area and s / n over the 0.3 - 10 kev energy band .
data reduction was performed using xmm science analysis system ( sas v. 10.0 ) , starting from the observation data files ( odf ) and following standard procedures .
filtered events are characterised by pattern @xmath174 , and are free from background flares .
typical source extraction regions are 45 arcsec radius circles .
spectra were extracted and used to select the energy bands for the computation of time lags .
they were grouped to a minimum of 20 counts per bin , while response matrices were generated through the rmfgen and arfgen sas tasks .
the analysis of the time series was carried out using routines implemented through idl v. 6.1 .
correction of sporadic count rate drops ( usually involving single time bins ) in the time series , which occur as a consequence of event losses due to telemetry dropouts , was performed by rescaling the count rate within the bin for the effective fractional time bin length .
we computed time lag - frequency spectra between light curves in the soft and hard x - ray energy bands .
the soft and hard energy bands were selected so as to single out energies dominated by the soft excess and the primary power law . to this aim
we adopted a phenomenological approach , although we note that several tests have been done by slightly varying the selected energy bounds , and the obtained results are all consistent with each other .
specifically , we first fitted the data in the 1 - 4 kev energy band with a simple power law absorbed by a cold column of gas ( which accounts for any warm absorber - induced extra curvature at high energies ) , with all the parameters left free to vary . for the soft band , we fixed at 0.3 kev the low energy bound , and selected , as high energy bound , the energy at which the soft excess significantly deviates ( at more than @xmath18 ) from the extrapolation of the best fit absorbed - power law . as the hard energy band we used the 1 - 5 kev range , excluding energies where significant deviations from the best fit power law were observed , e.g. due to the presence of troughs produced by complex absorption ( at @xmath19 kev ) or to the presence of a broad fe k line red tail ( at @xmath20 kev ) .
data above 5 kev were , in general , excluded to avoid contamination from components of the fe k line complex .
a detailed compilation of all the adopted energy bands can be found in tables [ tab : obs ] and [ tab : obs2 ] .
+ the time lag - frequency spectra are computed following the techniques described in detail by nowak et al ( 1999 ) and applied to xmm-_newton _ data in de marco et al ( 2011 ) .
the time lag is derived from the formula @xmath21 , where @xmath22 is the frequency - dependent phase of the average cross power spectrum between the soft and hard time series .
the resulting lag - frequency spectra are rebinned multiplicatively , i.e. the bin size is set equal to @xmath23times the frequency value , with step size , @xmath24 , chosen between @xmath25 depending on the quality of the data .
sources for which a negative lag was reported in the literature have been re - analyzed with our procedures . | similarities in timing properties black hole systems suggest same physical mechanism in sources wide range masses uttley al 2005 mchardy 2006 represents important achievement theory of unification of bh accretion breakthrough was discovery of mass - scaling law regulates characteristic time - scales of variability with high frequency break in power spectral density function relation holds for objects different size over eight magnitudes x - ray binaries active galactic nuclei agreement with standard accretion disk models characteristic time - scales depend linearly on bh mass shakura sunyaev 1973 treves 1988 analogy from comparison of time lags between x - ray energy bands hard / positive lags lagging observed in bhxbs and agn interpreted in propagation of mass accretion rate fluctuations in disc ( kotov et al 2001 arvalo uttley 2006 lags usually detected at low fequencies below psd high frequency break new perspective from study of high frequency soft / negative lags laggingfirst detection soft / negative lag in agn light curves reported in narrow line seyfert 1 ) galaxy 1h0707 - 495 fabian 2009 zoghbi 2010 interpreted as signature relativistic reflection continuum changes after equal light - crossing time from source to reflecting region different interpretation proposed complex system of scatterers / absorbers close to line of sight hundreds of gravitational radii from central source miller 2010 requiring special line of sight soft lags observed in other sources tripathi 2011 emmanoulopoulos zoghbi fabian 2011 largest - mass sources showing soft / negative lag pg 1211 + 143 ( marco 2011 ) lag spectrum shifted by one order of magnitude lag frequency amplitude found at @xmath8hz and @xmath9 s other low mass sources marco speculated difference explained if time - scales in pg 1211 + 143 scaled - up by bh mass 10 - 100 times mass other agn recorded paper hypothesis studying lag frequency spectrum in large sample of sources wide range masses 2.5 decadestime - scales of soft negative lags used study correlations with parameters luminosity bh mass sources analysed extracted from caixavar sample bianchi et al ponti et al 2012 includes well - exposed x - ray unobscured radio quiet agn observed by xmm-_newton observations june 2010 considered sources observation longer than 40 ks exposure ( 41 sources selected with published black hole mass @xmath3 estimates ( 39 sources selected sources significant variability in light curves excess variance estimates ponti et al 2012 computed sampling 2 - 10 kev light curve in 40 ks segments single - interval measurements time resolution 250 s sources excess variance different from zero at @xmath142@xmath15 confidence level included sources constant flux on time - scales @xmath16ks final sample reduced to 32 sources observations in xmm-_newton used corrupted by background flares lag - frequency spectra multiple observations combined better statistics only data from epic - pn camera used high effective area s n over 0.3 - 10 kev energy band data reduction performed using xmm science analysis system data standard proceduresfiltered events by pattern @xmath174 free from background flares source extraction regions are 45 arcsec radius circles spectra extracted select energy bands for computation time lags grouped to 20 counts per bin response matrices generated through rmfgen and arfgen sas tasks analysis time series using routines idl v. 6.1 correction of count rate drops rescaling count rate for fractional time bin length computed time lag - frequency spectra between light curves in soft and hard x - ray energy bands single out energies dominated by soft excess primary power law adopted phenomenological approach energy results consistent fitted data in 1 - 4 kev energy band with simple power law absorbed by cold column of gas parameters left free to vary for soft band fixed at 0.3 kev low energy bound selected high energy bound energy soft excess deviates more than @xmath18 from best fit absorbed - power law hard energy band used 1 - 5 kev range excluding energies where significant deviations from fit power lawtroughs complex absorption @xmath19 kev or broad fe k line red tail @xmath20 kev data above 5 kev excluded contamination fe k line complex adopted energy bands in tables tab obs ] obs2 time lag - frequency spectra computed techniques nowak et al 1999 xmm-_newton data de marco et al 2011 ) time lag derived from formula @xmath21 @xmath22 frequency - dependent phase average cross power spectrum soft hard time series lag - frequency spectra rebinned multiplicatively bin size equal to @xmath23times frequency step size @xmath24 chosen between @xmath25 quality data negative lag re - analyzed | 0.316412 | 1,968 | 996 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,191 | in the present paper , we suggest a convenient model for the vector @xmath0-meson longitudinal leading - twist distribution amplitude @xmath1 , whose distribution is controlled by a single parameter @xmath2 . by choosing proper chiral current in the correlator , we obtain new light - cone sum rules ( lcsr ) for the @xmath3 tffs @xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , in which the @xmath7-order @xmath1 provides dominant contributions .
then we make a detailed discussion on the @xmath1 properties via those @xmath3 tffs .
a proper choice of @xmath2 can make all the tffs agree with the lattice qcd predictions .
a prediction of @xmath8 has also been presented by using the extrapolated tffs , which indicates that a larger @xmath9 leads to a larger @xmath8 . to compare with the babar data on @xmath8 ,
the longitudinal leading - twist da @xmath1 prefers a doubly - humped behavior . | the meson light - cone distribution amplitude ( lcda ) relates to the matrix elements of the nonlocal light - ray operators sandwiched between the hadronic state and the vacuum .
it provides underlying links between the hadronic phenomena at the small and large distances . the leading - twist ( twist-2 )
lcda arouses people s great interests due to its role in hard exclusive processes @xcite , i.e. it always provides dominant contributions to those processes .
the investigation on the lcdas has been the subject of numerous studies , especially for the simpler lcdas of the pseudoscalar mesons pion , kaon and etc . as for the vector @xmath0 meson , its lcdas
are much more involved due to its complex structures : there are chiral - even or chiral - odd lcdas for the @xmath0 meson , the @xmath0 meson has longitudinal ( @xmath10 ) and transverse ( @xmath11 ) polarization states .
several approaches have been adopted to study the @xmath0-meson lcda properties , such as the qcd sum rules @xcite , the light - cone quark model @xcite , the ads / qcd model @xcite and etc .
the properties of the @xmath0-meson lcda are also helpful for us to understand other vector mesons lcdas .
that is , by taking the @xmath12-breaking effect into consideration , one can further study the @xmath13 meson lcdas @xcite .
.the @xmath0-meson lcdas up to twist-4 and @xmath14-order .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] we take two types of semi - leptonic decays as a try to determine the ckm matrix element @xmath8 . one is the @xmath15-type via the process @xmath16 with branching ratio and lifetime @xmath17 and @xmath18ps @xcite .
another is the @xmath19-type via the process @xmath20 with branching ratio and lifetime @xmath21 and @xmath22ps @xcite .
our predicted weighted averages of @xmath8 are given in table [ gammatota3 ] , the babar predictions are also included as a comparison .
the errors come from the choices of the @xmath23-quark mass , the borel window and the threshold parameter @xmath24 , the experimental uncertainties are from the measured lifetimes and decay ratios .
table [ gammatota3 ] show that @xmath8 increases with the increment of @xmath9 .
we observe that by choosing @xmath25 $ ] , its central value is consistent with the babar prediction @xcite .
the babar predictions are based on the lcsr @xcite or isgw @xcite predictions on @xmath3 tffs , respectively .
we have constructed a convenient model ( [ da : wh ] ) for the longitudinal leading - twist lcda @xmath26 , in which a single parameter @xmath27 controls its longitudinal behavior . by varying @xmath28 $ ]
, the @xmath26 shall evolve from a single - peaked behavior to a doubly - humped behavior .
we have discussed its properties via the @xmath3 tffs by using the lcsr approach .
those chiral lcsrs for the tffs shall be dominated ( over @xmath29 ) by @xmath1 either directly or indirectly , then those tffs do provide us a platform to test the properties of the leading - twist @xmath1 . after extrapolating the tffs to their allowable region ,
we compare them to those of lattice qcd predictions .
those tffs become smaller with the increment of @xmath2 , and either a too smaller or a too larger @xmath2 is not allowed by the lattice qcd estimations .
if we have a precise lattice qcd estimation , we can get a more strong constraint on the @xmath0-meson da behavior . in comparison to the babar prediction on the differential decay width @xmath30 @xcite and also the tffs from lattice
qcd , we find that smaller @xmath31 ( or @xmath32 ) is not suitable . as a further comparison with the babar prediction on the @xmath8
, we observe that by choosing @xmath25 $ ] , its central values show a better agreement with the babar prediction @xcite .
thus , we can predict that @xmath26 prefers a doubly - humped behavior other than the sing - peaked behavior of the transverse leading - twist lcda @xmath33 as suggested by ref.@xcite . as a final remark
, the present approach can also be applied to study other vector meson lcdas .
for example , by taking the @xmath12-breaking effect into consideration , one can further study the @xmath13 meson lcdas .
a detailed discussion on the @xmath13 meson lcdas under the same approach of the present paper is in preparation . +
* acknowledgments * : this work was supported in part by natural science foundation of china under grant no.11075225 and no.11275280 , and by the fundamental research funds for the central universities under grant no.cqdxwl-2012-z002 . | meson light - cone distribution amplitude lcda ) relates to matrix elements nonlocal light - ray operators between hadronic state vacuum provides links between hadronic phenomena small large distances leading - twist ) lcda arouses interests in hard exclusive processes dominant contributions investigation on lcdas subject of numerous studies simpler lcdas pseudoscalar mesons pion kaon vector @xmath0 meson lcdas involved complex structures chiral - even - odd lcdas for longitudinal transverse polarization states approaches adopted study-meson lcda properties qcd sum rules light - cone quark model ads / qcd model properties-meson lcda helpful understand other vector mesons lcdas @xmath12-breaking effect study @xmath13 meson lcdas @xmath0-meson lcdas up to twist-4 @xmath14-order two types of semi - leptonic decays determine ckm matrix element @xmath8 @xmath15-type process @xmath16 with branching ratio lifetime @xmath17 @xmath18ps@xmath19-type process @xmath20 branching ratio lifetime @xmath21 @xmath22ps @xcite predicted weighted averages @xmath8 in table gammatota3 babar predictions included errors from @xmath23-quark mass borel window threshold parameter @xmath24 experimental uncertainties from measured lifetimes decay ratios @xmath8 increases increment @xmath9 choosing @xmath25 central value consistent with babar prediction @xcite predictions based on lcsr @xcite isgw @xcite predictions @xmath3 tffs constructed model for longitudinal leading - twist lcda @xmath26 single parameter @xmath27 controls longitudinal behavior varying @xmath28 $ @xmath26 single - peaked to doubly - humped behavior discussed properties via @xmath3 tffs lcsr approach chiral lcsrs tffs dominated by @xmath1 tffs platform test properties leading - twist @xmath1 compare lattice qcd predictions tffs smaller with increment @xmath2 @xmath2 not allowed by lattice qcd estimations precise lattice qcd estimation strong constraint on @xmath0-meson behaviorcomparison babar prediction differential decay width @xmath30 @xcite tffs lattice qcd smaller @xmath31 or @xmath32 ) not suitable @xmath8 choosing @xmath25 central values better agreement with babar prediction @xcite predict @xmath26 prefers doubly - humped behavior sing - peaked behavior transverse leading - twist lcda @xmath33 suggested.@xcite present approach study other vector meson lcdas @xmath12-breaking effect study @xmath13 meson lcdas detailed discussion @xmath13 meson lcdas in preparation work supported by natural science foundation china grant no.11075225.11275280 fundamental research funds central universities grant.cqdxwl-2012-z002 | 0.183445 | 1,146 | 593 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,193 | the normalized multiplicity moments and their relation with soft and hard processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions are analyzed in a general two - component model .
it is found that , the strong fluctuations in binary collision number @xmath0 in minimum - bias events can enhance the hard component , especially for the higher order moments .
this enhancement can not be effectively described by modifying the participant number in the one - component model . | the relativistic heavy ion collisions at sps and rhic may be the only way to create the extreme conditions necessary to produce a new state of matter quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) in the laboratory@xcite .
one can attempt to understand the energy density achieved in the collisions by studying the multiplicity and transverse energy distributions through hydrodynamic models@xcite . at sps energies , the global quantities like average multiplicity
, multiplicity distribution and rapidity distribution can be well described by soft processes only , namely by the number of participant nucleons only@xcite .
however , at rhic energies , the measured pseudorapidity density normalized per participant pair for central au - au collisions shows that @xmath1 more particles are produced than at sps@xcite .
this indicates that the yield of particles created by hard scattering processes becomes important at rhic@xcite .
one can decompose the multiplicity at fixed impact parameter into a soft component and a hard component as@xcite @xmath2 where @xmath3 and @xmath0 are the participant number and binary collision number , respectively .
however , the two - component expression ( [ softhard ] ) can be effectively described by a simple power - law form , @xmath4 which is then similar to that measured at sps@xcite . a natural question
then arises : can one find other global observables which are more sensitive to the hard processes than the multiplicity itself , and which can not be effectively described in the models with only soft processes ? as is well known , the multiplicity moments are important characteristics in multiparticle production
. the properties of the multiplicity distribution can be completely described by the normalized moments @xmath5 in ref.@xcite @xmath6 were investigated at sps energies with a general wounded nucleon model .
it was found that the normalized multiplicity moments are independent of the concrete behavior of elementary nucleon - nucleon collisions , but dominated by the normalized participant moments @xmath7 provided that the colliding nuclei are not too light . in this paper
we investigate how the hard processes change the normalized multiplicity moments .
we extend the study in ref.@xcite to including the hard component .
we will focus on the sensitivity of @xmath6 to the colliding energy , nuclear geometry and especially to the geometry fluctuations .
at fixed impact parameter @xmath8 , the nuclear geometry of soft and hard processes is expressed in terms of @xmath3 and @xmath0@xcite , respectively , @xmath9\ , \nonumber\\ n_c(b ) = \int d^2{\bf s } & & \sigma_n t_a({\bf s})t_b({\bf b - s})\ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath10 is the nucleon - nucleon inelastic cross section , and @xmath11 and @xmath12 are the local participant densities in the plane orthogonal to the collision axis defined as @xmath13 if the average multiplicity distribution of each soft source is @xmath14 , and the average multiplicity distribution of each hard source is @xmath15 , the multiplicity distribution of an @xmath16 collision at impact parameter @xmath8 is the supposition of the contributions of @xmath3 soft sources and @xmath0 hard sources : @xmath17 it will be seen later that the results in this paper are not concerned with the concrete form of @xmath14 and @xmath15 . taking into account all the processes with different @xmath8 , the final - state multiplicity distribution of the nucleus - nucleus collisions is @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the distribution function of @xmath3 and @xmath0 . since @xmath0 calculated with ( [ npnc ] ) is a monotonous function of @xmath3 , @xmath20 is just the distribution function @xmath21 which can be obtained from ( [ npnc ] ) as @xmath22 we introduce now generating functions@xcite @xmath23 and @xmath24 for the whole system and the elementary soft and hard sources , @xmath25^{n_p } \left[f_c(\theta)\right]^{n_c}\ , \nonumber\\ f_p(\theta ) & \equiv & \sum_{n_p } \theta^{n_p } g_p(n_p)\ , \nonumber\\ f_c(\theta ) & \equiv & \sum_{n_c } \theta^{n_c } g_c(n_c)\ , \ \
-1\le \theta \le 1\ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] differentiating ( [ ffpfc ] ) with respect to @xmath26 and making use of the relations , @xmath27 we derive the multiplicity moments @xmath28 in terms of the elementary soft and hard moments @xmath29 and @xmath30 and the nuclear geometry moments
@xmath31 and @xmath32 , @xmath33 with the definition of the moments , @xmath34 where we have used the minimum participant number @xmath35 to select events .
@xmath36 means minimum - bias events and very large @xmath35 corresponds to central events . with the known multiplicity moments ,
the normalized moments @xmath37 can be expressed as an expansion in the inverse number of average participants @xmath38 , @xmath39 where the average ratio of hard to soft component @xmath40 depends on the elementary nucleon - nucleon dynamics and the nuclear geometry .
if we do not consider peripheral interactions alone , @xmath41 , we can then consider only the zeroth order in the expansion ( [ cis ] ) . in this case , only the average ratio of hard to soft component remains , the other dynamics of elementary soft and hard processes hidden in @xmath29 and @xmath30 with @xmath42 is washed away by the nuclear geometry .
when the hard contribution can be neglected , namely @xmath43 , the normalized multiplicity moments are just the normalized participant moments , @xmath44 this is the case discussed in ref.@xcite at sps energies .
let s first determine the soft and hard components @xmath45 and @xmath46 in elementary nucleon - nucleon collisions . to this end
, we compare the average multiplicity with the experimental data for central @xmath47 collisions .
since we did not introduce rapidity dependence in our discussion , we consider only the central rapidity region where the data show a plateau structure for different centrality bins . by comparing the average participant number @xmath48 , the average multiplicity per participant pair @xmath49 and the multiplicity for @xmath50 @xmath51 with the experimental data@xcite in the central rapidity region @xmath52 at rhic and the parametrization of the @xmath50 data@xcite @xmath53 we can determine at different energies the average ratio @xmath54 and the minimum participant number @xmath35 which is used to select centrality in calculating geometry moments . using a wood - saxon distribution , @xmath55 .
[ tab1 ] with the parameters @xmath56 for @xmath57 and taking @xmath58 at @xmath59 a gev ( @xmath60 for @xmath61 a gev)@xcite , the two parameters are shown in tab.([tab1 ] ) .
we see that at rhic energies , @xmath62 , the soft component is still more important than the hard component .
the influence of nuclear geometry is twofold : the average numbers @xmath48 and @xmath63 and the fluctuations of @xmath3 and @xmath0 around their average values . for central collisions the average numbers @xmath48 and @xmath63 are huge , but the fluctuations are small .
this can be seen clearly in tab.([tab1 ] ) where @xmath64 and @xmath65 . for minimum - bias events the average numbers are relatively small , but
the fluctuations are the maximum .
the multiplicity @xmath66 is only related to the average values @xmath48 and @xmath63 . when the hard contribution vanishes , the average multiplicity is proportional to @xmath48 .
the hard contribution reflected in the ratio @xmath54 leads to an extra @xmath63 dependence .
the centrality dependence of the average multiplicity per participant pair ( [ data1 ] ) can be calculated by changing the minimum participant number @xmath35 from @xmath67 to @xmath68 . in fig.([fig1 ] ) it is compared with the data in the central rapidity region @xmath52 for the central @xmath47 collisions at @xmath69 a gev@xcite . the extra geometry dependence induced by the hard component is weak . since @xmath70 and @xmath71 , the multiplicity moments @xmath28 for @xmath72 are associated with both the average numbers @xmath48 and @xmath63 and the fluctuations in @xmath3 and @xmath0 . from eq.([cis ] ) the normalized moments @xmath6 depend on the fluctuations and the average ratio @xmath54 of hard to soft component .
fig.([fig2 ] ) shows the centrality and energy dependence of @xmath54 . at any energy
the centrality dependence is very weak .
therefore , the behavior of the normalized moments @xmath6 is mainly controlled by the fluctuations in @xmath3 and @xmath0 .
let s first consider the limit of no fluctuations , @xmath73 . in this limit ,
@xmath74 we have @xmath75 in this case there is no difference between the two - component and one - component model . although fluctuations around the average numbers always exist , and it is difficult to choose events with the same impact parameter @xmath8 , namely with the same @xmath3 and @xmath0 , in experiments , for very central collisions with large @xmath48 and @xmath63 , @xmath3 and @xmath0 fluctuate in a narrow region , the case is then similar to the above limit
the fluctuations grow up when the minimum participant number @xmath35 decreases from its maximum value @xmath76 .
fig.([fig3 ] ) shows the centrality dependence of the fluctuations @xmath77 . as the orders @xmath78 and @xmath79 are not too small , the fluctuations are very strong for minimum - bias events . in order to see the contribution from the hard processes , we define the ratio of the normalized moments with and without consideration of the hard component , @xmath80 the centrality and energy dependence of @xmath81 is shown in fig.([fig4 ] ) .
while there is no remarkable difference between @xmath82 and @xmath6 in central collisions , the big fluctuations in @xmath3 and @xmath0 in minimum - bias events enhance the hard contribution , and this enhancement become more and more important when colliding energy increases . at @xmath83a gev ,
the hard contribution to @xmath84 is almost @xmath85 .
the effect of the hard scattering processes on the average multiplicity can be effectively described in the one - component model by modifying the participant number@xcite , @xmath86 by comparing the average multiplicity @xmath87 with the rhic data listed in tab.([tab1 ] ) , we can determine the power @xmath88 and the average contribution of each effective soft source @xmath89 . corresponding to the colliding energy @xmath90 a gev , we have @xmath91 , respectively . in the effective one - component model ,
the normalized moments are just the effective participant moments , @xmath92 when the peripheral interactions are not considered alone .
while the contribution of the hard processes to the average multiplicity through the average binary collision number @xmath63 can be equivalently expressed by increasing the average participant number from @xmath48 to @xmath93 , the fluctuations in @xmath0 can not be effectively included in the fluctuations in @xmath93 .
this can be seen clearly in fig.([fig5 ] ) which shows the ratio @xmath94 as a function of the centrality for @xmath47 collisions . from the comparison with fig.([fig4 ] ) , @xmath95 , the fluctuations in @xmath0 are partly included in the fluctuations in the effective participant number @xmath96
. however , the difference between the two - component model and the effective one - component model is still remarkable in minimum - bias events , especially for the higher order moments and at high energies .
the huge average participant number @xmath48 and binary collision number @xmath63 in relativistic heavy ion collisions make it difficult to extract dynamic information on hard processes from the geometry background .
different from the multiplicity moments @xmath28 which depend on both the average numbers @xmath97 and @xmath63 and the fluctuations in @xmath3 and @xmath0 strongly , the normalized moments @xmath98 have only weak @xmath48 and @xmath63 dependence , and are mainly associated with the fluctuations in @xmath3 and @xmath0 . therefore , the geometry background for @xmath6 is not so complicated as that for @xmath28 .
we have investigated the normalized moments @xmath6 in the frame of a general two - component model . when the hard component can be neglected at sps energies , @xmath6
are completely determined by the geometry fluctuations , the dynamics is totally washed away . when the hard processes become important at rhic energies , the average ratio of hard to soft component depends on the centrality weakly , and @xmath6 are dominated by the fluctuations . for central collisions where the fluctuations are weak , @xmath6 approach to @xmath99 , the dynamic information can not be seen in @xmath6 .
however , the big fluctuations in minimum - bias events make us to see clearly the difference between the models with and without hard component .
while the average effect of the hard processes can be effectively described in the one - component model by modifying the participant number , we have found that the fluctuations in the binary collision number can not be fully included in the fluctuations in the effective participant number . | relativistic heavy ion collisions at sps rhic extreme conditions new quark - gluon plasma ( ) in laboratory energy density by studying multiplicity transverse energy distributions through hydrodynamic models at sps energies global quantities like average multiplicity distribution rapidity distribution described by soft processes number participant nucleons at rhic measured pseudorapidity density per participant pair for central collisions shows more particles produced than sps yield of particles by hard scattering processes important at rhic decompose multiplicity at fixed impact parameter into soft hard component are participant number binary collision number two - component expression softhard described by simple power - law form similar to at sps@xcite question other global observables more sensitive to hard processes than multiplicity not described in models with soft processes ? multiplicity moments important characteristics in multiparticle production properties described by normalized moments investigated at sps energies with model normalized multiplicity moments independent of nucleon - nucleon collisions dominated by normalized participant moments colliding nuclei not too light investigate how hard processes change normalized multiplicity momentsextend study@xcite hard component focus sensitivity @xmath6 colliding energy nuclear geometry fluctuations fixed impact parameter @xmath8 nuclear geometry soft hard processes expressed @xmath3 @xmath0@xcite @xmath9 n_c(b = d^2{ s @xmath10 nucleon - nucleon inelastic cross section @xmath11 @xmath12 local participant densities plane orthogonal collision axis @xmath13 average multiplicity distribution soft source @xmath14 hard source @xmath15 multiplicity distribution @xmath16 collision impact parameter @xmath8 supposition contributions @xmath3 soft sources @xmath0 hard sources @xmath17 results not concerned concrete form @xmath14 @xmath15 different @xmath8 final - state multiplicity distribution nucleus - nucleus collisions @xmath18 @xmath19 distribution function @xmath3 @xmath0@xmath0 calculated with npnc monotonous function of @xmath3 @xmath20 distribution function @xmath21 obtained from npnc @xmath22 generating functions@xcite @xmath23 @xmath24 for system elementary soft hard sources @xmath25{n_p_c(\theta{n_c f_p(\theta\equiv\sum_p\theta_p_p f_c\theta\sum_c\theta g_c_c\theta differentiating ffpfc @xmath26 relations @xmath27 derive multiplicity moments @xmath28 elementary soft hard moments @xmath29 @xmath30 nuclear geometry moments @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 definition moments @xmath34 minimum participant number @xmath35 select events @xmath36 minimum - bias events large @xmath35 central events multiplicity moments normalized moments @xmath37 expressed expansion in inverse number average participants @xmath38 @xmath39 average ratio hard to soft component @xmath40 depends on nucleon - dynamics nuclear geometry peripheral interactions @xmath41 consider zeroth order in expansion cisaverage ratio hard to soft remains other dynamics @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath42 washed by nuclear geometry hard contribution neglected @xmath43 normalized multiplicity moments participant moments @xmath44 discussed ref.@xcite sps energies determine soft hard components @xmath45 @xmath46 in nucleon - nucleon collisions compare average multiplicity with experimental data central @xmath47 collisions rapidity dependence consider central rapidity region plateau structure centrality comparing average participant number @xmath48 multiplicity per participant pair @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 experimental data central rapidity region @xmath52 rhic parametrization @xmath50 data @xmath53 determine energies average ratio @xmath54 minimum participant number @xmath35 select centrality geometry moments wood - saxon distribution @xmath55 parameters @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 parameters shown tab at rhic energies @xmath62 soft component more important than hard influence nuclear geometry average numbers @xmath48 @xmath63 fluctuations @xmath3 @xmath0 central collisions average numbers @xmath48 @xmath63 huge fluctuations smalltab @xmath64 minimum - bias events average numbers small fluctuations maximum multiplicity @xmath66 related to average values @xmath48 hard contribution vanishes average multiplicity proportional to @xmath48 hard contribution @xmath54 leads extra @xmath63 dependence centrality dependence average multiplicity per participant pair calculated changing minimum participant number @xmath35 to compared with central rapidity region @xmath52 central @xmath47 collisions @xmath69 extra geometry dependence hard component weak multiplicity moments @xmath28 @xmath72 associated with average numbers @xmath48 @xmath63 fluctuations @xmath3 @xmath0 normalized moments @xmath6 depend on fluctuations average ratio @xmath54 hard to soft component fig shows centrality energy dependence @xmath54 centrality dependence weak behavior normalized moments @xmath6 controlled by fluctuations @xmath3 @xmath0 consider limit of no fluctuations @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 no difference between two - one - component modelfluctuations around average numbers exist difficult to choose events same impact parameter @xmath8 @xmath3 @xmath0 central collisions with large @xmath48 fluctuate narrow region similar fluctuations grow when minimum participant number @xmath35 decreases from maximum @xmath76 fig shows centrality dependence fluctuations @xmath77 orders @xmath78 small fluctuations strong for minimum - bias events define ratio normalized moments with without hard component centrality energy dependence of @xmath81 shown in fig. no difference between @xmath82 @xmath6 in central collisions big fluctuations in @xmath3 @xmath0 minimum - bias events enhance hard contribution when colliding energy increases @xmath83a hard contribution to @xmath84 almost @xmath85 effect hard scattering on average multiplicity described modifying participant number comparing average multiplicity @xmath87 with rhic data determine power @xmath88 average contribution of each effective soft source @xmath89 colliding energy @xmath90 @xmath91 effective one - component model normalized moments are effective participant moments peripheral interactions not consideredcontribution hard processes to multiplicity collision number @xmath63 increasing participant number from to fluctuations in @xmath0 in fluctuations @xmath93 fig ratio @xmath94 centrality @xmath47 collisions fluctuations @xmath0 partly included in effective participant number @xmath96 difference between two - component model one - component model remarkable in minimum - bias events higher order moments high energies average participant number @xmath48 binary collision number @xmath63 in heavy ion collisions difficult extract dynamic information hard processes from geometry multiplicity moments @xmath28 depend on average numbers @xmath97 fluctuations normalized moments @xmath98 weak @xmath48 dependence associated with fluctuations @xmath3 geometry background for @xmath6 not complicated @xmath28 investigated normalized moments @xmath6 in two - component model hard component neglected at sps energies @xmath6 determined by geometry fluctuations dynamics washed away processes important at rhic energies ratio hard to soft depends on centrality weakly @xmath6 dominated by fluctuationscentral collisions fluctuations weak @xmath6 approach to @xmath99 dynamic information seen in @xmath6 big fluctuations minimum - bias events difference models with without hard component average effect hard processes described one - component model modifying participant number fluctuations binary collision number included effective participant number | 0.497099 | 3,023 | 1,549 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,197 | using the parkes radio telescope , we have searched for pulsed radio emission from the recently discovered x - ray pulsars ax j1811.5@xmath01926 and psr j0537@xmath06910 in the supernova remnants g11.2@xmath00.3 and n157b , respectively .
we detected no significant pulsed radio emission from these pulsars and have set an upper limit of 0.07 mjy on the 1374 mhz flux from ax j1811.5@xmath01926 and upper limits of 0.18 mjy and 0.06 mjy for the flux from psr j0537@xmath06910 at 660 mhz and 1374 mhz , respectively . assuming a power law radio spectral index of 2
, these flux limits correspond to luminosity limits at 400 mhz of 20 mjy kpc@xmath1 for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 and 1100 mjy kpc@xmath1 for psr j0537@xmath06910 .
our luminosity limit for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 is lower than the observed luminosities of other young radio pulsars .
the upper limit on the luminosity for psr j0537@xmath06910 in n157b is not significantly constraining due to the large distance to the pulsar .
we have also searched for giant radio pulses from both pulsars and have found no convincing candidates .
# 1 # 2 _ mem .
soc .
astron .
it .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ the messenger _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
nach . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
lett . _ * # 1 * , l#2 # 1 # 2 _ astron
. astrophys .
rev . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
suppl .
ser . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
j. _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ ann .
rev .
astron .
astrophys . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. lett .
_ * # 1 * , l#2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. suppl .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
space sci .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ adv .
space res .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ bull .
astron .
inst .
czechosl . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ j. quant .
spectrosc .
radiat .
transfer _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ mon . not .
r. astr .
soc . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ mem .
r. astr .
soc . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ phys .
lett .
rev . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ publ .
astron .
. japan _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ publ .
astr .
soc .
pacific _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ nature _ * # 1 * , # 2 epsf.sty | recently , two rotation - powered x - ray pulsars were discovered in the young supernova remnants g11.2@xmath00.3 and n157b .
the pulsar ax j1811.5@xmath01926 in the galactic remnant g11.2@xmath00.3 , discovered in archival _ asca _ data , has a 65 ms period ( torii et al .
psr j0537@xmath06910 , discovered in n157b in the large magellanic cloud ( lmc ) , was found in _
data and has a period of 16 ms , making it the fastest known pulsar associated with a remnant ( marshall et al .
the discovery of these two pulsars brings the total number of known young crab - like pulsars in plerionic nebulae to five and doubles the number of such systems known in the lmc .
the discovery of pulsed radio emission from these systems would be important for several reasons . a determination of the dispersion measure ( dm ) for these pulsars would constrain the electron distribution toward the lmc as well as the taylor & cordes ( 1993 ) galactic dm - distance model .
in addition , determining the radio luminosity distribution for young pulsars is important for population synthesis models
. furthermore , ground - based radio telescope facilities are often more practical for long - term timing of pulsars than are x - ray instruments . for young pulsars with high spin - down rates , long - term timing can determine accurate braking indexes . in the several cases where young pulsars show infrequent but sudden spin - ups known as glitches
, radio timing can also give information on the interior physics of the neutron star ( e.g. shemar & lyne 1996 ) .
in addition , measuring a time - of - arrival phase offset between the radio and x - ray pulses helps constrain the pulsar magnetic field geometry and radiation emission mechanism ( e.g. romani & yadigaroglu 1995 ) .
we have undertaken a search for pulsed radio emission from these two pulsars using the 64-m radio telescope in parkes , nsw , australia .
we conducted the search at two center frequencies , 660 mhz and 1374 mhz .
for the 1374 mhz observations , we used the center beam of the newly installed 20-cm multibeam receiver with a filter - bank back end designed and built at jodrell bank .
the search setup used was similar to that of the current parkes multibeam pulsar survey , described elsewhere ( camilo et al .
ax j1811.5@xmath01926 was observed for a single 4.5 hr integration at 1374 mhz while psr j0537@xmath06910 was observed twice at 660 mhz in separate 4 hr integrations and once at 1374 mhz for 6 hr .
data were recorded on magnetic tape for processing offline . as part of this same project
, we searched for and found the pulsar psr j1617@xmath05055 at 1374 mhz near the supernova remnant rcw 103 ( kaspi et al .
1998 ) which was also first discovered as an x - ray pulsar from archival _ asca _ data ( torii et al .
1998 ) .
since the predicted topocentric period for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 was uncertain due to the unknown period derivative of the pulsar , we performed a standard spectral analysis , after first dedispersing the data at a variety of dms from 0 to 1477 pc @xmath2 .
after each dedispersion , the frequency channels were summed and a power spectrum computed from the resulting time series .
this power spectrum was then searched for significant spikes .
each candidate frequency was then further investigated by dedispersing and folding the original data at the candidate dm and period .
a search was then performed for a small range in dm and period around the nominal dm and period and the highest resulting signal - to - noise profile was computed . since the ephemeris for psr j0537@xmath06910 has a well - constrained period derivative ( marshall et al .
1998 ) , we folded the data at the predicted topocentric period at a variety of dms spanning 0 to 300 pc @xmath2 , which includes the expected dm range of 50 to 200 pc @xmath2 for lmc pulsars , based on previous pulsar discoveries ( mcconnell et al .
1991 , manchester et al .
1993 ) . in each dm trial , the data were searched in a period range spanning the nominal folding period .
for the 660 mhz data , this period range was @xmath3150 ns , and for the 1374 mhz data the range was @xmath395 ns , corresponding to @xmath336@xmath4 and @xmath323@xmath4 from the expected period , respectively . we have also searched the dedispersed time series for crab - like giant radio pulses at the expected range of dms . in this search , each dedispersed time series was rebinned at a variety of widths and searched for samples greatly exceeding the noise .
potential giant pulse candidates were investigated by examining the non - dispersed time series for a strong signal in the same part of the time series in order to rule out signals from terrestrial interference . for pulsar ax j1811.5@xmath01926 , we searched a dm range from 40 to 670 pc @xmath2 and found no convincing giant pulse candidates . for psr j0537@xmath06910 , we searched the two 660 mhz data sets and the 1374 mhz data set over the expected lmc dm range of 50 to 200 pc @xmath2 .
we found no convincing giant pulse candidates in any of the three n157b data sets .
we did not detect radio pulsations from either of the two x - ray pulsars . by assuming distances to the remnants and using the taylor & cordes ( 1993 ) dm - distance model to estimate temporal smearing of pulses from dispersion
, we set upper limits for pulsed emission of 0.07 mjy and 0.06 mjy at 1374 mhz for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 and psr j0537@xmath06910 , respectively . we have also set an upper limit of 0.18 mjy for the 660 mhz flux for psr j0537@xmath06910 . by assuming a radio power law index of @xmath5 = 2 and distances of @xmath6 kpc for g11.2@xmath00.3
( green et al . 1988 ) and @xmath7 kpc for n157b ( gould 1995 ) , we obtain 400 mhz luminosity ( @xmath8 ) upper limits for the two pulsars , for comparison with other sources . for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 , @xmath9 mjy kpc@xmath1 . for psr j0537@xmath06910 ,
the luminosity upper limit is @xmath10 mjy kpc@xmath1 using the more constraining 660 mhz flux limit .
these results are outlined in table 1 .
* table 1 - summary of radio observations * [ cols="<,^,^ " , ] of the five known radio pulsars having characteristic age @xmath11 kyr ( the crab pulsar , psr b1509@xmath058 , psr b0540@xmath069 , psr b1610@xmath050 , and psr j1617@xmath05055 ) , psr b1509@xmath058 has the lowest pulsed radio luminosity , @xmath12 mjy kpc@xmath1 .
the largest luminosities belong to the crab pulsar and psr b0540@xmath069 , which have @xmath13 mjy kpc@xmath1 and @xmath14 mjy kpc@xmath1 respectively .
of course , all luminosity estimates are distance - dependent , hence subject to some uncertainty .
our upper limit of @xmath15 mjy kpc@xmath1 for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 is significantly lower than the luminosities of the crab pulsar and psr b0540@xmath069 and is below the value for psr b1509@xmath058 .
this suggests that ax j1811.5@xmath01926 should have detectable radio emission . from the taylor & cordes ( 1993 ) dm - distance model
, we estimate that the expected dm for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 is @xmath16350 pc @xmath2 , corresponding to about 3 ms dispersion smearing in each frequency channel , and that the multipath scattering from plasma inhomogeneities should be less than 1 ms .
thus , neither of these effects should significantly affect the detectability of the 65 ms periodicity .
therefore , the non - detection means that either the radio beam does not intersect our line of sight or that the radio luminosities of very young pulsars can be lower than what has been generally thought ( e.g. narayan & ostriker 1990 ) .
if the latter is true , then deeper radio searches with higher sensitivity may reveal a previously undiscovered population of young faint pulsars .
our luminosity limit is not as stringent for psr j0537@xmath06910 due to its large distance .
also , the poorly known interstellar / intergalactic medium in this direction could significantly scatter radio pulses beyond detectability , particularly at 660 mhz .
we conclude from our search that the x - ray pulsar ax j1811.5@xmath01926 in g11.2@xmath00.3 has pulsed radio emission that is certainly of significantly lower flux than all other known pulsars of comparable age , and is probably either underluminous relative to these sources or is not beaming toward earth . our much less stringent limits on the radio luminosity for psr j0537@xmath06910 in n157b are unconstraining .
next generation telescopes such as the square kilometer array would be ideal instruments to carry out deeper searches toward these sources . | two rotation - powered x - ray pulsars discovered in supernova remnants g11.2@xmath00.3 and n157b pulsar ax j1811.5@xmath01926 in g11.2@xmath00.3 in data 65 ms period psr j0537@xmath06910 in n157b large magellanic cloud found in data period 16 ms fastest pulsar remnant discovery pulsars young crab - like pulsars in plerionic nebulae to five doubles systems in lmc discovery of pulsed radio emission important determination dispersion measure ) for pulsars electron distribution toward lmc taylor galactic dm - distance model radio luminosity distribution for pulsars important for population synthesis models ground - based radio telescope facilities practical for long - term timing of pulsars than x - ray instruments high spin - down long - term timing braking indexes radio timing information on interior physics neutron star measuring time - of - arrival phase offset between radio x - ray pulses pulsar magnetic field geometry radiation emission mechanismundertaken search for pulsed radio emission from two pulsars 64-m radio telescope in parkes nsw australia conducted search at two frequencies 660 1374 mhz 1374 mhz observations used beam 20-cm multibeam receiver filter - bank end jodrell bank search setup similar to parkes multibeam pulsar survey ax j1811.5@xmath01926 observed 4.5 hr integration at 1374 mhz psr j0537@xmath06910 observed twice at 660 mhz 4 hr integrations once 1374 mhz 6 hr data recorded on magnetic tape found pulsar psr j1617@xmath05055 at 1374 mhz near supernova remnant rcw 103 discovered as x - ray pulsar from data predicted topocentric period for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 uncertain unknown period derivative pulsar performed standard spectral analysis data at dms 0 to 1477 frequency channels summed power spectrum computed searched for significant spikes each candidate frequency investigated data search for small range in dm period highest signal - to - noise profile computedephemeris psr j0537@xmath06910 has constrained period derivative marshall 1998 folded data at predicted topocentric period dms 0 to 300 pc @xmath2 expected dm range 50 to 200 pc for lmc pulsars data searched period range folding period 660 mhz data @xmath3150 ns 1374 mhz @xmath395 ns @xmath336@xmath4 @xmath323@xmath4 searched dedispersed time series for crab - like giant radio pulses range rebinned widths searched for samples exceeding noise potential giant pulse candidates investigated non - dispersed time series for strong signal terrestrial interference pulsar ax j1811.5@xmath01926 searched dm range 40 to 670 pc @xmath2 no convincing giant pulse candidates psr j0537@xmath06910 searched 660 mhz 1374 mhz over expected lmc dm range 50 to 200 pc @xmath2 no convincing giant pulse candidates in three data sets detect radio pulsations from two x - ray pulsarsassuming distances remnants taylor cordes 1993 model smearing pulses set upper limits pulsed emission 0.07 mjy 0.06 mjy at 1374 mhz ax j1811.5@xmath01926 psr j0537@xmath06910 upper limit 0.18 mjy 660 mhz flux psr j0537@xmath06910 assuming radio power law index @xmath5 = 2 distances @xmath6 kpc g11.2@xmath00.3 @xmath7 kpc n157b 400 mhz luminosity @xmath8 upper limits pulsars ax j1811.5@xmath01926 @xmath9 mjy kpc@xmath1 psr j0537@xmath06910 luminosity upper limit @xmath10 mjy kpc@xmath1 660 mhz flux limit results outlined table 1 radio five radio pulsars b1509@xmath058 lowest pulsed luminosity @xmath12 mjy kpc@xmath1 largest luminosities crab pulsar psr b0540@xmath069 @xmath13 mjy kpc@xmath1 @xmath14 mjy kpc@xmath1luminosity estimates distance - dependent uncertainty upper limit @xmath15 mjy kpc@xmath1 for ax j1811.5@xmath01926 lower than crab pulsar psr b0540@xmath069 below psr b1509@xmath058 suggests j1811.5@xmath01926 detectable radio emission taylor cordes 1993 dm - distance model expected dm for @xmath16350 pc @xmath2 3 ms dispersion each channel multipath scattering from plasma inhomogeneities less than 1 ms affect detectability 65 ms periodicity non - detection means radio beam intersect line sight or luminosities young pulsars lower deeper searches may reveal population young pulsars luminosity limit not stringent for psr j0537@xmath06910 large distance poorly known interstellar intergalactic medium could scatter radio pulses beyond detectability at 660 mhz x - ray pulsar ax j1811.5@xmath01926 g11.2@xmath00.3 radio emission lower flux than other pulsars comparable age underluminous or not beaming toward earthstringent limits radio luminosity psr j0537 n157b unconstraining next generation telescopes square kilometer array ideal deeper searches | 0.34883 | 2,240 | 1,198 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,199 | we report on the successful implementation of a new approach to locking the frequencies of an opo - based squeezed - vacuum source and its driving laser .
the technique allows the simultaneous measurement of the phase - shifts induced by a cavity , which may be used for the purposes of frequency - locking , as well as the simultaneous measurement of the sub - quantum - noise - limited ( sub - qnl ) phase quadrature output of the opo .
the homodyne locking technique is cheap , easy to implement and has the distinct advantage that subsequent homodyne measurements are automatically phase - locked .
the homodyne locking technique is also unique in that it is a sub - qnl frequency discriminator .
nonclassical states are considered key resources in quantum information processing applications @xcite , quantum key distribution systems @xcite and high - precision measurements such as gravitational wave interferometry @xcite .
one particular nonclassical state for which a number of applications have been proposed is the vacuum - squeezed state , which is commonly produced via a sub - threshold optical parametric oscillator ( opo ) in continuous - wave systems @xcite . in such systems ,
a squeezed vacuum is created via the non - linear interaction between a classical pump field and the modes of a cavity @xcite .
mechanical disturbances to the cavity make it impossible to create , measure or use the squeezed vacuum if the opo cavity is left uncontrolled .
consequently , all such systems are frequency - locked to the driving laser . in order to frequency - lock the opo and driving laser together
, an error signal must be generated that is bipolar and proportional to their frequency detuning .
common approaches to extracting an appropriate error signal include the pound - drever - hall ( pdh ) modulation - based technique @xcite or modulation - free techniques such as hnsch - couillaud @xcite and tilt - locking @xcite . these are all quite different techniques , but they share in common the idea that they are implemented separately from the homodyne measurements of the squeezed cavity mode .
such an approach leaves the squeezed output mode undisturbed and ready to direct towards subsequent experiments or measurement apparatus .
here we report on the successful implementation of an alternative scheme , which we call homodyne locking , that allows simultaneous measurement of the phase - shift induced by the cavity ( for the purposes of frequency locking ) as well as phase - quadrature homodyne detection of the squeezed output of the opo .
the homodyne locking technique makes use of the principle that a non - resonant mode , which provides the phase reference for frequency - locking , can also be used as the local oscillator in a homodyne detector .
the homodyne locking technique has the distinct advantage that any subsequent homodyne detector is automatically locked to a known phase angle .
this locking technique is easy and cost - effective to implement as well as , uniquely , being a sub - quantum - noise - limited frequency discriminator .
the homodyne locking technique is based on the observation that measurements of the phase quadrature of the output of a cavity can be used to estimate the frequency detuning between the input to the cavity and the cavity mode of interest @xcite . that is , assuming a singly - resonant cavity , no pump depletion , and parametric de - amplification , the sub - threshold opo is described by the following set of equations
@xcite : @xmath0 here , @xmath1 denotes the annihilation operator for the squeezed cavity mode defined in an appropriate rotating frame .
the detuning @xmath2 represents the frequency deviation of the cavity s resonant frequency from the nominal laser frequency @xmath3 .
the cavity decay rates are determined by mirror reflectivities @xmath4 and are given by @xmath5 for a cavity round trip time of @xmath6 .
the total decay rate for the fundamental is @xmath7 .
the seed field incident on the front face of the cavity is given by @xmath8 and the squeezed output field is @xmath9 .
the amplitude and phase quadratures of any field @xmath10 are denoted @xmath11 and @xmath12 respectively .
the intra - cavity annihilation operator can be decomposed into @xmath13 as can the seed @xmath14 .
. [ cavity-1 ] , can be solved in steady - state to find that @xmath15 - x_{s}^{\pm}. \label{alpha}\ ] ] from here on , we will assume without loss of generality that the input field is real .
linearising eq .
[ alpha ] near @xmath16 , we find that steady - state measurements of the phase quadrature of the output field are linearly proportional to the detuning and hence can be used as an error signal .
. [ cavity-1 ] can also be solved in frequency space for the fluctuating terms to yield an expression for the squeezing spectrum : @xmath17 + \delta x_l^{\pm } 2\sqrt{\kappa_{s}\kappa_l } } { ( \kappa+i\omega ) \mp \chi } \label{squeezingsimple}\ ] ] here we have set @xmath16 and @xmath18 is a frequency measured relative to one of the longitudinal resonances of the opo cavity .
we assume that @xmath18 is small compared to the free - spectral - range ( fsr ) of the opo cavity .
therefore , a single measurement of the phase quadrature of the output field affords both a direct measurement of the squeezed output of the sub - threshold opo , eq .
[ squeezingsimple ] , and the detuning between the cavity resonance and the input field as required for frequency locking , eq .
[ alpha ] . fig .
[ schem ] illustrates schematically the experiment used to demonstrate homodyne locking .
the 532 nm , frequency - doubled output of a diode - pumped , miniature monolithic nd : yag laser is used to pump a sub - threshold opo .
the nonlinear crystal is periodically - poled ktp , with a phase - matching temperature of @xmath19c .
the opo has a free - spectral range of 199 mhz and is operated with a parametric amplification of 3.9 db and de - amplification of 2.6db .
a small fraction of the source laser power is tapped off prior to frequency - doubling and is used as the seed to the opo and the local oscillator for the homodyne measurements quadrature homodyne measurement requires a bright , coherently related local oscillator ( lo ) with which to interfere the field of interest @xcite .
the phase of the lo relative to the field of interest determines the measurement quadrature . in the experiments described here the lo co - propagates with the seed to ensure that phase fluctuations are common - mode and hence that the homodyne detector is passively locked to measure the phase quadrature as required by eqs .
[ alpha ] and [ squeezingsimple ] . in the experiment
described here 1% of the power of the input field is set to the polarisation appropriate to the nonlinear crystal in the opo cavity .
the remaining 99% of the power is in the orthogonal , non - resonant polarisation and acts as the lo .
this is not the only means of implementing passive locking of the homodyne detector . in a previous experiment involving an empty cavity ,
the same effect was achieved by using a spatially offset , but co - propagating lo @xcite .
the upper trace of fig .
[ error ] shows a plot of @xmath20 measured using this technique . in this polarization implementation ,
the seed and the local oscillator each produce a dispersion shaped error signal when resonant with the cavity , but with flipped sign relative to each other . the lower trace in fig .
[ error ] is a plot of the measured transmission of the seed field through the opo cavity .
the error signal is used to lock the opo cavity to a resonance for the seed mode , which corresponds to one of the peaks in the lower trace in fig .
[ error ] .
the fluctuating component of the same homodyne measurement that lead to fig . [ error ] can be used to measure the squeezed output of the opo . fig .
[ sqz ] is a plot of the variance of the homodyne measurement , @xmath21 , at frequencies near the first resonance of the opo , made when the feedback controller is active .
maximum squeezing of approximately 2db has been observed at the resonant frequency of 199mhz .
coupled with a measured de - amplification of 2.6db , this measurement suggests that the overall escape and detection efficiency of the system is greater than 87% @xcite . with thoughtful design , the homodyne locking technique can work even with an experiment interposed between the opo and the homodyne detector .
furthermore , a co - propagating local oscillator turns out to be a most useful addition to subsequent experiments .
for example , consider fig .
[ unisqz](a ) in which the schematic diagram for a universal squeezer is reproduced from ref .
@xcite . here
, an input field is interferred with a phase - quadrature - squeezed vacuum on a beamsplitter of transmittivity @xmath22 .
phase quadrature detection of one port of the beamsplitter is performed in the usual fashion @xcite .
the homodyne photocurrent is amplified by @xmath23 and fed forward to the other port of the beamsplitter .
after feed - forward , the output is a phase - quadrature squeezed version of the input , with excellent purity @xcite . not shown in fig .
[ unisqz](a ) are the requirements to lock the frequency of the opo cavity and the phase of the lo .
fig .
[ unisqz](b ) shows a schematic diagram for an alternative implementation . in that implementation
, the homodyne locking technique can be used to simultaneously lock the frequency of the opo cavity and the lo phase .
the diagram is shown with polarisation modes , but the idea could be equally well implemented using displaced beams , higher order spatial modes and so forth . treating the input and output of the opo cavity as vector quantities , @xmath24 and @xmath25 , it is straightforward to trace the change in notation through eqs .
[ cavity-1 ] , [ alpha ] and [ squeezingsimple ] .
we treat @xmath26 as being the desired cavity mode , and @xmath27 as an orthogonal mode in one of the degrees of freedom .
the latter is not resonant with the opo cavity , but it co - propagates with the former and interacts with all of the same linear optical elements .
the steady - state value of the homodyne photocurrent is @xmath28 as required to frequency - lock the opo cavity and the linearised fluctuating component of the homodyne photocurrent is as required for the universal squeezing operation @xcite when @xmath16 . in summary
, we have proposed a new approach to controlling the resonant frequency of a sub - threshold opo .
this approach is based on direct measurement of the squeezed phase quadrature output of the opo , rather than on the traditional approach where the squeezed output is not used for frequency - locking .
the homodyne locking technique is cheap , easy to implement and , uniquely , is a sub - quantum - noise - limited frequency discriminator .
we have demonstrated the homodyne locking technique on a sub - threshold opo producing approximately 2db of squeezing .
we have also shown , via an explicit example , that homodyne locking remains useful when an experiment is interposed between the opo and the homodyne detector .
indeed this approach greatly simplifies the experiment as it relieves the necessity of locking subsequent homodyne detectors . _
acknowledgments - _ this work was supported by the australian research council .
99 m. a. nielsen and i. l. chuang , _ quantum computation and quantum information _ , cambridge university press , uk , 2000 . n. j. cerf and p. grangier , j. opt . soc . am .
b , * 24 * , 324 ( 2007 ) .
v. chickarmane and b. bhawal , phys .
lett . a , * 190 * 22 ( 1994 ) . h .- a .
bachor and t. c. ralph , _ a guide to experiments in quantum optics _ ( 2 ed . ) , wiley - vch , berlin , 2004 .
r. w. p. drever , j. l. hall , f. v. kowalski , j. hough , g. m. ford , a. j. munley and h. ward , appl .
phys .
b. , * 31 * , 97 , ( 1983 ) .
t. hnsch , b. couillaud , opt . commun . * 35 * , 441 ( 1980 ) .
d. a. shaddock , m. b. gray , and d. e. mcclelland , opt .
lett .
, * 24 * 1499 ( 1999 )
. e. h. huntington , m. r. james , i. r. petersen , proc .
ieee cdc , new orleans , usa , 2007 .
m. heurs , e. h. huntington , s. z. s. hassen , i. r.petersen and m. r. james , proc .
qcmc , canada , paper number p2 - 41 , 2008 ; and s. z. s. hassen , m. heurs , e. h. huntington , i. r. petersen and m. r. james , under review j. phys . b. ( 2009 ) .
y. takeno , m. yukawa , h. yonezawa , and a. furusawa , opt .
exp .
, * 15 * , 4321 ( 2007 ) .
jun - ichi yoshikawa , t. hayashi , t. akiyama , n. takei , u. l. andersen and a. furusawa , proc .
qels , 2006 paper qfd2 .
r. filip , p. marek , u. l. andersen , phys .
rev .
a 71 , 042308 ( 2005 ) . | 1 . schematic of homodyne locking experiment . + fig .
2 . error signal ( top trace ) and seed transmission through the opo cavity ( bottom trace ) of the opo cavity .
3 . squeezing spectrum at the first fsr of the opo .
schematic of universal squeezer @xcite .
( b ) alternative implementation . | 1 schematic homodyne locking experiment fig . 2 error signal seed transmission opo cavity 3 squeezing spectrum first fsr opo schematic universal squeezer @xcite alternative implementation | 0.066429 | 75 | 37 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,204 | we have updated the analysis for the solution to the solar neutrino problem by the long - wavelength neutrino oscillations induced by a tiny breakdown of the weak equivalence principle of general relativity , and obtained a very good fit to all the solar neutrino data . | it is considered that the results coming from atmospheric neutrino experiments @xcite , as well as solar neutrino experiments @xcite , are strong evidence of neutrino oscillation indicating the presence neutrino mass and flavor mixing . however , several alternative explanations to these results , which do not invoke neutrino mass and/or mixing , exist and are not yet excluded @xcite . the interesting idea that gravitational forces may induce neutrino mixing and flavour oscillations , if the weak equivalence principle of general relativity is violated ,
was proposed about a decade ago @xcite , and thereafter , many works have been performed on this subject @xcite .
many authors have investigated the possibility of solving the solar neutrino problem ( snp ) by such gravitationally induced neutrino oscillations @xcite , generally finding it necessary , in this context , to invoke the msw like resonance @xcite in order reduce appropriately the solar neutrino fluxes with the specific energy dependence , required to explain the data .
nevertheless we have demonstrated in ref .
@xcite that all the recent solar neutrino data coming from gallium , chlorine and water cherenkov detectors can be well accounted for also by long - wavelength neutrino oscillations induced by a violation of the equivalence principle ( vep ) . in this talk , we present updated fit of such gravitationally induced long - wavelength oscillation solution @xcite to the most recent solar neutrino data which include the first gno measurement @xcite .
we follow the framework proposed in refs . @xcite . in the presence of violation of equivalence principle ,
neutrino mixing and oscillation can occur even if neutrinos are massless . in this work
we assume oscillations only between two species of neutrinos , which are massless ( or degenerate in mass ) , either between active and active ( @xmath0 ) or active and sterile ( @xmath1 , @xmath2 being an electroweak singlet ) neutrinos .
to describe the vep induced massless neutrino oscillation mechanism , phenomenologically , we can simply do the following replacement in the usual mass induced oscillation formula : @xmath3 and @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is the mass squared difference , @xmath6 is the gravitational potential which is assume to be constant in our work , @xmath7 is the usual mixing angle which relate weak and mass eigenstates and @xmath8 is the mixing which relates weak and gravitational eigenstates , and @xmath9 is the quantity which measures the magnitude of vep .
the survival probability of @xmath10 produced in the sun after traveling the distance @xmath11 to the earth is given by , @xmath12 where the oscillation wavelength @xmath13 for a neutrino with energy @xmath14 is given by @xmath15 \left[\frac{10^{-15 } } { |\phi \delta \gamma|}\right ] \left[\frac { { \mbox{mev}}}{e}\right ] , \label{wavelength}\ ] ] which in contrast to the wavelength for mass induced neutrino oscillations in vacuum , is inversely proportional to the neutrino energy .
this energy dependence is very crucial in obtaining a good fit to the total rates without causing any problem with the sk spectrum @xcite .
we present here the results of our analysis only for active to active conversion since the results are qualitatively similar for active to sterile one @xcite .
-1.4 cm -0.7 cm -2.3 cm fig.1 : parameter region of @xmath16 and @xmath17 allowed by the total rates only for @xmath18 .
the best fit point is indicated by the filled circle .
[ fig1 ] 0.3 cm we performed the same statistical analysis as we did for three flavor vaccum oscillation solution to the snp in ref .
@xcite , which is slightly different from our analysis in ref .
we fit vep parameters @xmath17 and @xmath8 , and an extra normalization factor @xmath19 for the @xmath20b neutrino flux , to the most recent experimental results coming from homestake @xcite , sage @xcite , gallex @xcite and gno @xcite combined , and super - kamiokande ( sk ) @xcite .
we present in fig . 1 the allowed region determined only by the total rates for fixed @xmath20b flux .
we then present in fig .
2 the result for spectral shape analysis fitting only the @xmath20b spectrum measured by sk @xcite in the same way as we did in ref . @xcite .
finally , we perform a combined fit of the rates and the spectrum obtaining the allowed region presented in fig . 3 .
the combined allowed region is essentially the same as the one obtained by the rates alone .
we also show in fig .
4 , the predicted spectra for the best fitted parameters , which are in good agreement with the data .
-1.5 cm -0.5 cm -2.4 cm fig .
2 : same as in fig . 1 but for sk recoil electron spectrum .
it is the inner part of the contours which is excluded by the data .
-1.5 cm [ fig2 ] -0.5 cm -2.4 cm fig .
3 : same as in fig . 1 but for the rates and sk spectrum combined .
-0.3 cm [ fig3 ] -1.6 cm -0.3 cm -2.5 cm fig .
4 : expected spectrum for the best fitted parameters .
0.2 cm best fitted parameters as well as @xmath21 can be found in table i. from this table , we can conclude that the fit is quite good . for sterile conversion
, we found somewhat worse , but acceptable , fit compared to the active one .
for example , we found for the combined fit , @xmath21 = 19.5 for 24 d.o.f . for fixed @xmath19 .
-0.2 cm 0.2 cm . the best fitted vep parameters and values of @xmath21 .
values of @xmath17 are shown in units of @xmath22 .
number of degree of freedom are from top to bottom , 2 , 1 , 15 , 24 and 23 .
@xmath19 is fixed unless it is indicated as `` free '' in the parenthese .
we include 6 bins for the sk zenith angle dependence in the combined fit .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ tab1 ] -1.2 cm
we have obtained a very good fit to the most recent solar neutrino data for the vep induced long - wavelength neutrino oscillation .
let us finally remark that , in contrast to the usual vacuum oscillation solution to the snp , in this vep scenario no strong seasonal effect is expected in any of the present or future experiments , even the ones that will be sensitive to @xmath23be neutrinos .
see ref .
@xcite for more detail .
hn thanks e. lisi for a useful discussion during the now2000 workshop .
this work was supported by the brazilian funding agencies fapesp and cnpq .
v. gavrin for the sage collab . , talk given at the xix international conference on neutrino physics and astrophysics ( neutrino 2000 ) , sudbury , canada , june 16 - 21 , 2000 , available at http://nu2000.sno.laurentian.ca/. w. hampel _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 447 * ( 1999 ) 127 .
j. pantaleone , a. halprin , and c. n. leung , phys .
d * 47 * ( 1993 ) r4199 ; j. n. bahcall , p. i. krastev , and c. n. leung , phys .
d * 52 * ( 1995 ) 1770 ; s. w. mansour and t. k. kuo , phys .
d * 60 * ( 1999 ) 097301 . | results from atmospheric solar neutrino experiments evidence of neutrino oscillation neutrino mass flavor mixing alternative explanations not neutrino mass mixing exist not excluded idea gravitational forces may induce neutrino mixing flavour oscillations if weak equivalence principle of relativity violated proposed decade ago many works performed authors investigated solving solar neutrino problem by gravitationally induced neutrino oscillations necessary to invoke resonance reduce solar neutrino fluxes with energy dependence demonstrated recent solar neutrino data from gallium chlorine water detectors can be accounted for by long - wavelength neutrino oscillations induced by violation of equivalence principle present updated gravitationally induced long - wavelength oscillation solution to recent solar neutrino data first gno measurement follow framework proposed violation of equivalence principle neutrino mixing oscillation can occur even if neutrinos masslessassume oscillations between two neutrinos massless active active @xmath0 or active sterile ( @xmath1 describe vep induced massless neutrino oscillation mechanism replacement in mass induced oscillation formula : @xmath3 and @xmath4 @xmath5 mass squared difference @xmath6 gravitational potential @xmath7 mixing angle mass eigenstates @xmath8 mixing weak gravitational eigenstates @xmath9 quantity magnitude of vep survival probability of @xmath10 in sun after distance @xmath11 to earth given by @xmath12 oscillation wavelength @xmath13 for neutrino with energy @xmath14 given by @xmath15 neutrino oscillations vacuum inversely proportional to neutrino energy energy dependence crucial good fit to total rates problem with sk spectrum present results for active to active conversion similar for active to sterile -1.4 cm -0.7 cm -2.3 cm fig.1 : parameter region of @xmath16 and @xmath17 allowed by total rates for @xmath18 best fit point indicated by filled circlefig1 0.3 cm performed same statistical analysis three flavor vaccum oscillation solution snp ref. @xcite slightly different analysis fit vep parameters @xmath17 @xmath8 extra normalization factor @xmath19 @xmath20b neutrino flux recent experimental results from homestake sage gallex gno super - kamiokande sk ) @xcite present fig . 1 allowed region total rates fixed @xmath20b flux . 2 result spectral shape analysis fitting @xmath20b spectrum measured sk @xcite combined fit rates spectrum allowed region fig . 3 combined region same as rates fig . 4 predicted spectra best fitted parameters good agreement data -1.5 cm -0.5 cm -2.4 cm fig . 2 sk recoil electron spectrum inner part contours excluded data -1.5 cm -0.5 cm -2.4 cm 3 rates sk spectrum combined -0.3 cm -1.6 cm -0.3 cm -2.5 cm fig 4 expected spectrum best fitted parameters 0.2 cm best fitted parameters @xmath21 table i. fit good sterile conversion worse acceptable fit compared active onefound combined fit @xmath21 = 19.5 for 24 d.o.f fixed @xmath19 -0.2 cm best fitted vep parameters values @xmath21 values @xmath17 shown units @xmath22 degree freedom top to bottom 2 1 15 24 23 @xmath19 fixed unless free 6 bins sk zenith angle dependence combined fit -1.2 cm good fit solar neutrino data vep induced long - wavelength neutrino oscillation vep scenario no strong seasonal effect expected present future experiments @xmath23be neutrinos see ref @xcite detail thanks e. lisi discussion now2000 workshop supported brazilian funding agencies fapesp cnpq v. gavrin talk xix international conference neutrino physics astrophysics 2000 sudbury canada june 16 - 21 2000 http://nu2000.sno.laurentian.ca/ w. hampel et al . phys . b * 447 * ( 1999 ) 127 pantaleone halprin c n. leung phys * 47 * ( 1993 ) r4199 krastevd * 52 1995 ) 1770 mansour kuo. 60 * 1999 ) 097301 | 0.30935 | 1,792 | 889 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,214 | microcanonical critical droplet theory and molecular dynamics simulations are used to examine static coexistence between solid and liquid phases in nanoscale lead clusters .
it is shown that the theory predicts the existence of a metastable coexisting state above a critical cluster radius @xmath0 , with this state becoming stable for clusters of radius @xmath1 .
molecular dynamics simulations of lead clusters confirm the existence of stable coexisting states in 1427-atom and 2057-atom clusters but find no stable coexisting state in a 931-atom cluster . | the coexistence of solid and liquid phases in atomic clusters has been of experimental @xcite and theoretical @xcite interest for some time . in large clusters , as in bulk materials , static coexistence is expected theoretically@xcite and is readily observed in both experiment@xcite and simulation@xcite . however in sufficiently small clusters , simulations find that coexistence is dynamic i.e. clusters fluctuate in time between fully solid and fully liquid states @xcite .
small clusters avoid static coexistence because of the prohibitive cost of forming an interface .
this causes an s - bend in the microcanonical caloric curve @xcite and the corresponding negative heat capacities which been observed in small sodium clusters @xcite .
however , it is currently not known at what size static coexistence gives way to dynamic coexistence .
the time - scale on which dynamic coexistence occurs will be governed by the height of the energy barrier separating the solid and liquid states of the cluster @xcite . however ,
if a coexisting state exists , then this coexisting state should also be dynamically accessible .
this is not seen in at least some small clusters @xcite .
evidently , in sufficiently small clusters coexistence is unstable . at
what sizes do states of static coexistence occur ?
to determine when phase coexistence will be stable , one needs to know the relative cost of forming an interface between phases in a given cluster . a common approach to studying coexistence in clusters is to apply critical droplet theory in the capillarity approximation ( i.e. where cluster material parameters , especially surface energies , are approximated by their bulk values ) .
for instance reiss et al @xcite used the capillarity approximation to develop a critical droplet theory of melting in the canonical ensemble , with the ( spherically - symmetric ) solid fraction of a cluster acting as an order parameter .
nielsen et al @xcite developed a similar critical droplet theory in the microcanonical ensemble .
they demonstrated that a stable static coexisting state can exist in this theory near the melting point , and validated this with constant - energy simulations of a large copper cluster .
cleveland et al @xcite developed an aspherical model which dealt with static coexistence where the liquid only partially wets the solid .
thus , in principle , critical droplet theory can be used to discuss coexistence in a variety of circumstances . to study coexistence
we will work in the microcanonical ensemble as constant temperature ensembles tend to suppress the inherent inhomogeneity in coexisting systems@xcite .
constant energy conditions are realised in isolated systems with poor thermal coupling to their environment , such as clusters in an inert gas atmosphere
. consequently we will use microcanonical critical droplet ( mcd ) theory @xcite to examine the stability of static solid - liquid coexistence in small metal clusters .
we will then use constant - energy molecular dynamics simulations to test the predictions of the theory .
here we use microcanonical critical droplet ( mcd ) theory @xcite to examine the stability of static coexistence .
the spherical coexisting solid - liquid cluster of radius @xmath2 , is considered to consist of a solid core , of radius @xmath3 , and a liquid outer shell .
the entropy ( per atom ) , @xmath4 , of a coexisting solid - liquid cluster of solid fraction @xmath5 at energy ( per atom ) @xmath6 is approximated by @xmath7 where @xmath8 and @xmath9 . here @xmath10 is the bulk melting temperature , @xmath11 is the heat capacity and quantities with a superscript @xmath11 indicate values at the bulk melting point .
the solid energy , @xmath12 , and liquid energy , @xmath13 , are related to the total energy , @xmath6 , for a cluster of radius @xmath2 as follows : @xmath14 where @xmath15 ( @xmath16 is the solid - vapour interfacial energy density , @xmath17 is the solid - liquid interfacial energy density and @xmath18 is the liquid - vapour interfacial energy density ) , @xmath19 is the bulk material density and @xmath20 is a correlation length which characterizes the short - range interaction between the solid - liquid and liquid - vapour interface @xcite .
the inclusion of this final term in equation ( [ energy ] ) ensures that @xmath21 as @xmath22 .
we now show that mcd theory predicts that there is a critical cluster radius below which coexistence becomes unstable . for a given total energy per atom @xmath6 ,
we can regard @xmath13 as a function of @xmath12 and @xmath23 : @xmath24 .
we may then extremise the entropy ( given by ( [ entropy ] ) ) of the mixed cluster with respect to @xmath12 and @xmath23 at fixed @xmath6 .
it is then straightforward show that the entropy is extremised when the following conditions hold : 1 ) @xmath25 , which is the normal condition for thermal equilibrium , and 2 ) @xmath23 must satisfy the following equation @xcite : @xmath26 where l = @xmath27 is the latent heat of fusion per atom . for sufficiently negative values of @xmath6 , there are two positive solutions to ( [ quartic ] ) @xmath28 .
there is always a range of energies where @xmath29 , as when @xmath30 , @xmath31 .
in fact @xmath32 represents a local minima in the entropy , corresponding to a barrier separating the solid and liquid phases .
similarly , for values of @xmath6 where @xmath33 exists and is less than one , @xmath33 is a local maxima in the entropy , corresponding to a coexisting state ( note that @xmath34 exists only when @xmath35 , where @xmath0 is given by : @xmath36 where @xmath37 and @xmath38 . that is
if @xmath35 , there is a range of energies where a locally stable coexisting state exists . at such an energy e , the coexisting state , with solid fraction @xmath33 ,
is separated from the liquid state by an energy barrier at @xmath32 .
however , the coexisting state with solid fraction @xmath33 is not necessarily globally stable . if the coexisting state exists at an energy @xmath6 , then @xmath39 .
however , there exist a range of energies where @xmath40 only if @xmath1 , where @xmath41 thus for clusters with @xmath42 , at energies where the coexisting state exists , the state is always metastable ( @xmath43 ) . for clusters with @xmath44 ,
no coexisting state exists at any energy .
we note that some of these parameters may be ill - defined for small clusters .
nonetheless the values of @xmath0 and @xmath45 may be calculated using the capillarity approximation i.e. using bulk values ( if available ) for the material parameters . for lead
@xcite we find that @xmath46 nm ( or approximately 1 atom ) and @xmath47 nm ( or approximately 100 atoms ) .
this suggests that coexistence ought to be stable down to quite small cluster sizes , although it is well - known that the melting behaviour of sub-100 atom clusters is quite erratic due to electron - shell effects @xcite that are certainly not captured in the mcd model .
using molecular dynamics simulations of pb clusters we have found that coexistence becomes unstable at approximately 1000-atoms .
we simulated the caloric curves for three clusters : a 2073-atom icosahedron , a 1427-atom icosahedron and a 931-atom icosahedron .
here we use surface - reconstructed icosahedra which are thought to be stable in pb clusters @xcite at these sizes using a glue potential @xcite . at each energy
the cluster was equilibrated for 0.6 ns , then the kinetic energy was averaged over a further 0.6 ns .
the energy increment used was 0.2 mev / atom with energies adjusted between constant energy simulations by a uniform scaling of the kinetic energy .
figure [ caloric - md ] shows the caloric curves for the 2073 and 1427-atom clusters moving from the solid state ( on left ) to the liquid state ( on right ) . both clusters exhibit a coexisting solid - liquid state separating the solid and liquid phases .
the curves in figure [ caloric - md ] resemble those constructed in ref @xcite with their layer - by - layer model of cluster melting .
\(a ) ( b ) note the change in temperature at the transition from fully solid to coexistence and in the transition from coexistence to fully liquid . in mcd theory , while the transition from coexistence to liquid is first - order , the transition from solid to coexistence is continuous . to check whether the 1427 and 2057-atom clusters are superheated when they undergo the transition from solid to the coexisting state
, we cooled a 1427-atom cluster from the coexistence region down until the cluster froze .
figure [ meltfreeze ] shows the reverse caloric curve ( constructed using equilibration times of 4 ns with an energy increment of -0.2 mev / atom ) .
the freezing transition takes place to well within 5 mev / atom of the transition from solid to coexistence , suggesting that the simulated caloric curve is close to the equilibrium caloric curve and that the transition at -1.715 ev / atom is a first - order transition which exhibits little rounding due to finite - size effects .
the origin of this discontinuity at this transition may correspond to the creation of a minimum " volume of liquid and as such the discontinuity is likely to disappear as @xmath48 . to characterise the coexisting state , we follow cleveland et al @xcite in using the bimodality of the distribution of diffusion coefficients to distinguish solid and liquid atoms .
a sequence of snapshots at different total energies of the 1427-atom cluster is shown in figure [ mixed ] .
the total energy of the atoms in each snapshot decreases from top left to top right to bottom left to bottom right .
each atom in the snapshot has been coloured either white or grey depending on the whether the diffusion coefficient of that atom ( calculated over a carefully chosen timescale ) is low mobility ( solid ) or high mobility ( liquid ) .
the snapshots reveal that the molten lead does not fully wet the solid .
they also reveal that the liquid fraction of the coexisting cluster increases as the total energy increases .
note that the melt does not wet the solid as assumed in equation [ energy ] whereas in bulk lead , the melt wets the solid ( since in bulk lead @xmath49 ) .
this is a clear indication that the capillarity approximation has broken down at these cluster sizes .
figure [ caloric-931 ] shows the caloric curve for a 931-atom cluster constructed in the same way as those for the larger clusters in figure [ caloric - md ] .
note that the curve does not show a stable solid - liquid coexisting state but that large fluctuations in temperature occur near the melting transition in the 931-atom caloric curve . using the same method for identifying solid and liquid regions as was used in figure [ mixed ]
, one can verify that the fluctuations in temperature are correlated with the appearance of a liquid region in the otherwise solid cluster .
this is due to the dynamic coexistence between the solid state and a coexisting state . which state is globally stable ?
we have resolved this with a very long duration run near the melting transition .
figure [ trace-931 ] shows a history of the temperature ( as determined using the method above ) for a 931-atom cluster at a total energy of @xmath50 ev / atom over approximately 15 ns .
the final state of the cluster is liquid ( achieved after approximately 8 ns ) , which suggests that the fluctuations ( between 0 and 8 ns in figure [ trace-931 ] and between @xmath51 and @xmath52 ev / atom in figure [ caloric-931 ] ) are non - equilibrium precursors to melting rather than true dynamic coexistence .
mcd theory certainly suggests that at sizes @xmath53 the coexisting state is metastable with respect to the liquid rather than the solid .
however , the caloric curve in figure [ caloric-931 ] suggests that the coexisting state is metastable with respect to both the solid and liquid states , as the cluster appears to spend more time in the solid state .
nonetheless , we conclude that there is no stable coexisting state for the 931-atom cluster at any energy . in ref @xcite
, we constructed a less detailed caloric curve for 1130-atom lead clusters by coalescence .
this curve also showed no evidence for stable coexistence .
the molecular dynamics simulations and mcd theory in the capillary approximation do not agree on the size at which coexistence becomes metastable in pb clusters . however , the snapshots in figure [ mixed ] strongly suggest that the capillarity approximation has broken down at these cluster sizes ( at least when it comes to reproducing the behaviour of the simulated clusters )
. this should not be surprising as atomic clusters are interesting precisely because their properties depend strongly on size .
however , if we are to take mcd theory beyond the capillarity approximation , we would require a detailed understanding of how surface energies , and other quantities such as latent heat , depend on surface curvature and/or size .
it is not simply a matter of inserting more accurate material properties into ( [ r2 ] ) .
it is also important to recognise that the spherically symmetric geometry assumed in equation ( [ energy ] ) is inappropriate for situations involving partial wetting where @xmath54 . in ref
@xcite , a critical droplet model was developed for the partial wetting case , although it was applied in the canonical ensemble .
evidently a generalisation of mcd theory to the partially wetting case would also be desirable
. similarly it would be interesting to determine by simulation and experiment the size at which @xmath55 in pb clusters i.e. the size below which complete wetting gives way to partial wetting .
partial and complete wetting has been observed recently in isolated metal alloy clusters using transmission electron microscopy @xcite .
finally , in the simulations the transition from solid to solid - liquid coexistence was discontinuous .
in mcd theory this transition is continous as the energy of the coexisting cluster , as given by equation ( [ energy ] ) , approaches the energy of an entirely solid cluster as @xmath22 .
this limit is an artificial feature of equation ( [ energy ] ) ; if this constraint were to be relaxed so that the energy of the coexisting cluster approached some other value as @xmath22 ( for instance , @xmath56 then the transition from solid to solid - liquid would be discontinuous . provided the energy of the solid cluster and that of the limiting solid - liquid cluster differed only by surface energy , this discontinuity would disappear as @xmath48 .
in summary , mcd theory predicts that the static coexistence of solid and liquid phases can only occur in clusters above a certain size given by equation ( [ r2 ] ) . below this critical size coexistence
is metastable or unstable .
molecular dynamics simulations of pb clusters using a glue potential appear to corroborate this scenario , although the transition occurs at a larger size , @xmath57 , ( where @xmath58 ) than that predicted by mcd theory using bulk material parameters in the capillarity approximation .
indeed this discrepancy between theory and simulation is probably due to the breakdown of this approximation at small cluster sizes .
we note that pb has an unusually large value of the prefactor @xmath59 that appears in equation ( [ r2 ] ) due to a relatively small latent heat of fusion .
other metals with small latent heats ( which are correlated with low melting points ) , such as hg or the alkali metals , will also have large values of @xmath60 .
it may be that in such metals coexistence is forbidden at quite large sizes . in most metals , however , with relatively large latent heats of fusion , we might expect static coexistence to remain stable down to rather small sizes . | coexistence of solid liquid phases in atomic clusters experimental theoretical interest for in large clusters static coexistence expected observed in experiment simulation in small clusters simulations find coexistence dynamic fluctuate between solid liquid states small clusters avoid static coexistence prohibitive cost of forming interface causes s - bend in microcanonical caloric curve negative heat capacities observed in small clusters not known at what size static coexistence gives way to dynamic coexistence - scale governed by energy barrier separating solid liquid states if coexisting state exists should be dynamically accessible not seen in some small clusters clusters coexistence unstable at what sizes states of static coexistence occur ? to needs relative cost of forming interface between phases common approach coexistence critical droplet theory in capillarity approximation cluster material parameters energies approximated by bulk values reiss et al used capillarity approximation critical droplet theory of melting in canonical ensemble solid fraction order parameter nielsen et al developed similar critical droplet theory in microcanonical ensembledemonstrated stable static coexisting state near melting point validated with constant - energy simulations large copper cluster cleveland et al developed aspherical model static coexistence liquid partially wets solid critical droplet theory coexistence circumstances work in microcanonical ensemble constant temperature ensembles suppress inhomogeneity systems constant energy conditions in isolated systems poor thermal coupling inert gas atmosphere microcanonical critical droplet theory examine stability static solid - liquid coexistence in small metal clusters constant - energy molecular dynamics simulations test predictions critical droplet theory examine stability static coexistence spherical coexisting solid - liquid cluster solid core liquid outer shell entropy ( per atom ) of coexisting solid - liquid cluster solid fraction @xmath5 energy ( per atom ) approximated by @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath10 bulk melting temperature @xmath11 heat capacity quantities indicate values bulk melting pointsolid @xmath12 liquid energy @xmath13 related to total energy @xmath6 for cluster radius @xmath2 @xmath14 @xmath15 solid - vapour solid - liquid liquid bulk material density @xmath20 correlation length short - range interaction between solid - liquid liquid - vapour interface inclusion final term ensures @xmath21 as @xmath22 mcd theory predicts critical cluster radius below coexistence becomes unstable total energy per atom @xmath6 @xmath13 as function of @xmath12 @xmath23 @xmath24 extremise entropy of mixed cluster @xmath12 @xmath23 at fixed @xmath6 entropy extremised when conditions hold : @xmath25 normal condition for thermal equilibrium @xmath23 satisfy equation @xcite : @xmath26 l = @xmath27 latent heat of fusion per atom for negative values of @xmath6 two positive solutions to @xmath28 range of energies where @xmath29 @xmath32 represents local minima in entropy barrier separating solid liquid phasesvalues @xmath6 @xmath33 exists less than one local maxima entropy coexisting state @xmath34 exists when @xmath35 @xmath0 given by @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath35 range of energies locally stable coexisting state exists coexisting state solid fraction @xmath33 separated from liquid state by energy barrier at @xmath32 coexisting state @xmath33 not globally stable coexisting state exists at energy @xmath6 @xmath39 range energies where @xmath40 @xmath1 @xmath41 clusters with @xmath42 coexisting state exists state metastable ( @xmath43 ) clusters with @xmath44 no coexisting state parameters ill - defined for small clusters values @xmath0 @xmath45 calculated using capillarity approximation bulk values material parameters lead @xcite @xmath46 nm 1 atom ) and @xmath47 nm 100 atoms coexistence stable small cluster sizes melting behaviour sub-100 atom clusters erratic due to electron - shell effects molecular coexistence unstable at 1000-atoms simulated caloric curves for three clusters 2073 1427 surface - reconstructed icosahedra stable in pb clusters @xcite glue potential @xcite each energy cluster equilibrated for 0.6 ns kinetic energy averaged 0.6 ns energy increment 0.2 mev / atom adjusted simulations by uniform scaling kinetic energy figure caloric - md shows curves 2073 1427-atom clusters from solid to liquid state clusters coexisting solid - liquid state separating curves resemble @xcite layer - by - layer model of cluster melting change in temperature at transition from solid to coexistence liquid theory transition from coexistence to liquid first - order solid to coexistence continuous check 1427 2057-atom clusters cooled 1427-atom cluster from coexistence until froze figure meltfreeze shows reverse caloric curve equilibration times 4 ns energy increment -0.2 mev / atom freezing transition within 5 mev / atom of transition from solid to coexistence simulated caloric curve close to equilibrium transition at -1.715 ev / atom first - order transition little rounding finite - size effectsorigin discontinuity at transition may correspond to creation minimum volume liquid likely to disappear as @xmath48 to characterise coexisting state follow cleveland et al @xcite using bimodality distribution diffusion coefficients to distinguish solid and liquid atoms sequence of snapshots at different energies 1427-atom cluster shown in figure [ mixed ] total energy decreases from to each atom coloured white or grey depending on diffusion coefficient low or high mobility liquid snapshots reveal molten lead fully wet solid liquid fraction of coexisting cluster increases as total energy increases melt wet solid in in bulk lead melt wets solid indication capillarity approximation broken down at cluster sizes figure [ caloric-931 ] shows caloric curve for 931-atom cluster curve show stable solid - liquid coexisting state large fluctuations in temperature occur near melting transition in 931-atom caloric curve method solid liquid regions fluctuations temperature correlated with appearance liquid region in solid cluster due to dynamic coexistence between solid state and coexisting state which state globally stable resolved with long duration run near melting transition figure trace-931 ] shows history temperature for 931-atom cluster at total energy @xmath50 ev / atom over 15 ns final state cluster is liquid after 8 ns fluctuations between 0 and 8 ns and @xmath51 and @xmath52 ev / atom are non - equilibrium precursors to melting dynamic coexistence mcd theory suggests at sizes @xmath53 coexisting state is metastable liquid caloric curve in suggests coexisting state metastable solid and liquid states cluster more time in solid state no stable coexisting state for 931-atom cluster at any energy constructed less detailed caloric curve for 1130-atom lead clusters by coalescence showed no evidence for stable coexistence molecular dynamics simulations and mcd theory agree on size at coexistence becomes metastable in pb clusters snapshots in figure suggest capillarity approximation broken down at these cluster sizes atomic clusters properties depend on size theory detailed understanding of surface energies latent heat depend on surface curvature size not simply inserting accurate material properties into ( [ r2 ] ) important recognise spherically symmetric geometry in equation energy inappropriate for situations partial wetting @xmath54 critical droplet model developed for partial wetting case applied in canonical ensemble generalisation of mcd theory to partially wetting case desirable interesting to determine size @xmath55 in pb clusters below complete wetting gives way to partial wetting partial wetting observed in isolated metal alloy clusters using transmission electron microscopy @xcite simulations transition from solid to solid - liquid coexistence discontinuous in mcd theory transition continous as energy coexisting cluster approaches energy solid cluster @xmath22 limit artificial feature if constraint relaxed energy cluster other value @xmath22 transition solid to liquid discontinuous energy by surface energy discontinuity as @xmath48 mcd theory predicts static coexistence of solid and liquid phases in clusters above certain size equation r2 below size coexistence metastable unstable molecular dynamics simulations of pb clusters glue potential corroborate scenario transition occurs at larger size @xmath57 @xmath58 than predicted by mcd theory bulk materialdiscrepancy between theory simulation due to breakdown approximation at small cluster sizes pb has large value prefactor @xmath59 equation due to small latent heat fusion other metals with small latent heats low melting points hg alkali metals have large values of @xmath60 coexistence forbidden at large sizes most metals with large latent heats fusion static coexistence stable to small sizes | 0.5696 | 3,486 | 1,738 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,221 | it is argued that the multiplicity distribution in proton - proton ( @xmath0 ) collisions , which is often parameterized by the negative binomial distribution , results from the multiplicity distribution measured in electron - positron ( @xmath1 ) collisions , once the fluctuating energy carried by two leading protons in @xmath0 is taken into account . | the charged particle multiplicity distribution is one of the most basic observables in high energy collisions .
although there is an abundance of experimental results , see e.g. , @xcite , on the theory side this problem is poorly understood . the multiplicity distribution measured in proton - proton ( @xmath0 ) collisions is often parameterized by the negative binomial ( nb ) distribution grosseoetringhaus:2009kz , ansorge:1988kn , breakstone:1983ns , alexopoulos:1998bi , which is characterized by two parameters : the mean number of particles @xmath2 , and @xmath3 , which measures the deviation from the poisson distribution . $ ] , which goes to poisson if @xmath4 ( at fixed @xmath5 ) . ]
nb distribution works well , with certain limitations @xcite , for a broad range of energies and in total and limited phase - space rapidity bins . for completeness
we add that @xmath3 is a decreasing function of energy .
interestingly , similar experimental observations were made in electron - positron ( @xmath1 ) collisions , see e.g. , grosseoetringhaus:2009kz , buskulic:1995xz .
nb works relatively well for total and limited phase - space bins in rapidity and @xmath3 decreases with energy .
there are many similarities between @xmath0 and @xmath1 but there are also important differences . at the same @xmath6 ,
the mean number of particles and @xmath3 are significantly larger in @xmath1 than in @xmath0 .
gev in @xmath0 collisions @xmath7 ( full phase - space ) in comparison to @xmath8 in @xmath1 at @xmath9 gev ( or @xmath10 when extrapolated to @xmath11 gev ) . ] as pointed out in refs .
@xcite some differences between @xmath0 and @xmath1 can be easily understood . in @xmath12 collisions a large fraction of available energy , given by @xmath6 ,
is carried away by two leading protons and is not available for particle production .
this explains the larger mean multiplicity in @xmath1 , where the leading proton effect is not present . as noticed in ref .
@xcite , this leads to the striking relation between total ( full phase - space ) mean number of particles in @xmath0 and @xmath1 interactions @xcite , see also batista:1998ry , sarkisyan:2010 kb : @xmath13that is , the mean number of particles in @xmath0 at a given @xmath6 is given by the mean number of particles in @xmath1 at @xmath14 , plus two leading protons .
this formula works surprisingly well from @xmath15 to @xmath16 gev ( see fig .
@xmath17 in ref .
@xcite ) and it remains to be verified at the lhc energy .
more recently , certain similarities between @xmath1 and ultra - relativistic au+au collisions at rhic were reported @xcite .
( [ mean_1 ] ) is suggestive of a universal mechanism of particle production in both systems , controlled mainly by the actual energy deposited into particle creation @xcite . in @xmath1
all available energy is consumed by produced particles , whereas in @xmath0 the _ effective _ energy coming into particle production is given by given by @xmath18 , where @xmath19 and @xmath20 is a proton mass . ]
@xmath21where @xmath22 and @xmath23 are the incoming and the leading proton momenta , respectively .
@xmath24 is a fraction of the longitudinal momentum carried by a leading proton , @xmath25 , and @xmath26 .
it this letter we show that eq .
( [ mean_1 ] ) can be extended to the whole multiplicity distribution .
we demonstrate that nb with small values of @xmath3 in @xmath0 results from nb in @xmath1 once the effective energy in @xmath0 is taken into account .
the problem of multiplicity distribution is naturally more complicated than the mean number of particles . to proceed we need to specify the leading proton @xmath27 distribution .
we choose the beta distribution @xmath28it is supported by rather limited experimental results chapman:1973kn , basile:1983 kb , however it seems a natural first choice . having ( [ f_x ] )
we obtain@xmath29which is the average momentum taken by a leading proton .
next we would like to clarify how @xmath30 is related to eq .
( [ mean_1 ] ) .
we obtain s of two leading protons are uncorrelated.]@xmath31taking@xmath32where @xmath33 @xcite we arrive at @xmath34it means that @xmath35 from eq .
( [ mean_1 ] ) is not related to @xmath36 , as naively expected , but to @xmath37 .
the latter can be calculated analytically leading to the following equation@xmath38which constrains the possible parameters of the beta distribution .
assuming @xmath39 @xcite , see eq .
( [ x_m ] ) , we obtain @xmath40 and @xmath41 , which fully determines @xmath42 .
the multiplicity distribution in @xmath0 collisions , @xmath43 , is related to the multiplicity distribution in @xmath1 interactions , @xmath44 , as @xmath45where @xmath46 .
this equation is a straightforward generalization of eq .
( [ mean_2 ] ) . instead of directly calculating the integral ( [ mean_2 ] )
we performed our calculations as follows .
first we sampled @xmath47 and @xmath48 of two leading protons from the beta distribution , @xmath30 , with @xmath49 and @xmath50 .
this allows to calculate the effective energy gev so that at least two pions can be produced .
] , @xmath51 , available for particle production in @xmath0 .
our choice of @xmath52 and @xmath53 ensures that eq .
( [ mean_1 ] ) is satisfied with the right coefficient @xmath35 .
next we sampled the number of particles from the multiplicity distribution measured in @xmath1 collisions at @xmath54 .
we take nb with the mean given by eq .
( [ n_ee ] ) , where @xmath55 @xmath56 , @xmath57 and @xmath58 where @xmath59 and @xmath60 grosseoetringhaus:2009kz .
is rounded to the nearest integer value .
nb with a negative integer @xmath3 becomes binomial distribution with the number of trials @xmath61 and the bernoulli success probability @xmath62 .
we also checked that the poisson distribution for @xmath63 leads to practically the same results . ] on top of that we add two particles corresponding to the leading protons .
we performed our calculations at @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 and @xmath69 gev .
the results are shown in fig .
[ fig : nbd ] , where the calculated multiplicity distributions in @xmath0 collisions ( open symbols ) are compared with nb fits .
it is worth mentioning that eq .
( [ mean_1 ] ) is satisfied by construction so our multiplicity distributions have the correct mean values , see tab .
[ tab:2 ] .
.calculated mean number of charged particles in @xmath0 collisions compared with the experimental data . [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ]
several comments are in order .
\(i ) we do not offer any explanation of multiplicity distributions in @xmath70 collisions .
our goal was to demonstrate that the problem of multiplicity distributions in @xmath0 could be reduced to @xmath1 once the fluctuating energy carried away by two leading protons is taken into account .
\(ii ) in this paper we focused on the total phase - space multiplicity distributions .
it is plausible that , as assumed in this letter , the total number of particles is determined ( mostly ) by the amount of available energy .
this is not obvious for limited phase - space bins since the distribution of particles in transverse momentum or rapidity may be modified by some nontrivial dynamics .
this problem is under investigation .
\(iii ) the main uncertainty of our approach is the leading proton @xmath27 distribution given in eq .
( [ f_x ] ) .
this form is partly supported by existing data , however at rather limited energies and ranges of @xmath27 .
thus it should be considered more as an educated guess .
in addition , we assumed that @xmath30 is energy independent , which is not proven experimentally .
a mild energy dependence is indicated by theoretical studies of batista:1998ry .
\(iv ) as seen in fig .
[ fig : nbd ] the nb fits overestimate calculated multiplicity distributions for higher values of @xmath71 .
interestingly , similar trend is seen in experimental data , see , e.g. , fig .
@xmath72 in ref .
grosseoetringhaus:2009kz and figs .
@xmath73 in ref .
@xcite .
\(v ) in this paper we extrapolate @xmath74 into higher energies using 3nlo qcd result @xcite , which is almost identical to nlo qcd fit and eq . ( [ n_ee ] ) . for @xmath75
we assume it is a linear function of @xmath76 up to the lhc energies .
\(vi ) it would be interesting to extend our study on different colliding systems including proton - nucleus and nucleus - nucleus collisions akindinov:2007rr .
in conclusion , we argued that the multiplicity distribution in @xmath0 collisions is directly related to the multiplicity distribution in @xmath70 interactions , once the leading proton effect in @xmath0 is properly accounted . in @xmath0
a large fraction of initial energy , roughly @xmath77 on average , is carried away by two leading protons and is not available for particle production .
this component fluctuates from event to event , which results in a broader multiplicity distribution in @xmath0 than in @xmath1 .
we provide a new argument in favor of a common mechanism of particle production in both systems , which is mainly controlled by the amount of energy available for particle production .
i thank andrzej bialas for very useful discussions . supported by the ministry of science and higher education ( mnisw ) , by founding from the foundation for polish science , and by the national science centre ,
dec-2012/06/a / st2/00390 .
j. f. grosse - oetringhaus and k. reygers , j. phys .
g * 37 * , 083001 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0912.0023 [ hep - ex ] ] .
r. e. ansorge _ et al . _
[ ua5 collaboration ] , z. phys .
c * 43 * , 357 ( 1989 ) .
a. breakstone _ et al . _
[ ames - bologna - cern - dortmund - heidelberg - warsaw collaboration ] , phys .
d * 30 * , 528 ( 1984 ) .
t. alexopoulos , e. w. anderson , n. n. biswas , a. bujak , d. d. carmony , a. r. erwin , l. j. gutay and a. s. hirsch _ et al .
_ , phys . lett .
b * 435 * , 453 ( 1998 ) .
r. szwed , g. wrochna and a. k. wroblewski , acta phys .
b * 19 * , 763 ( 1988 ) .
d. buskulic _ et al . _
[ aleph collaboration ] , z. phys .
c * 69 * , 15 ( 1995 ) .
m. basile , g. cara romeo , l. cifarelli , a. contin , g. dali , p. di cesare , b. esposito and p. giusti _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 92 * , 367 ( 1980 ) .
m. basile , g. cara romeo , l. cifarelli , a. contin , g. dali , p. di cesare , b. esposito and p. giusti _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 95 * , 311 ( 1980 ) .
m. basile , g. bonvicini , g. cara romeo , l. cifarelli , a. contin , m. curatolo , g. dali and c. del papa _ et al .
_ , nuovo cim .
a * 73 * , 329 ( 1983 ) . m. batista and r. j. m. covolan , phys . rev .
d * 59 * , 054006 ( 1999 ) [ hep - ph/9811425 ] .
e. k. g. sarkisyan and a. s. sakharov , eur .
j. c * 70 * , 533 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1004.4390 [ hep - ph ] ] .
b. b. back _ et al .
_ [ phobos collaboration ] , phys .
c * 74 * , 021902 ( 2006 ) .
j. w. chapman , j. w. cooper , 1 , n. green , a. a. seidl , j. c. van der velde , c. bromberg , d. h. cohen and t. ferbel _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 32 * , 257 ( 1974 ) .
m. basile , g. bonvicini , g. cara romeo , l. cifarelli , a. contin , m. curatolo , g. dali and c. del papa _ et al .
_ , lett .
nuovo cim . * 38 * , 359 ( 1983 ) .
p. ghosh , phys .
d * 85 * , 054017 ( 2012 ) [ arxiv:1202.4221 [ hep - ph ] ] .
i. m. dremin and j. w. gary , phys .
* 349 * , 301 ( 2001 ) [ hep - ph/0004215 ] .
a. akindinov , a. alici , p. antonioli , s. arcelli , m. basile , g. cara romero , m. chumakov and l. cifarelli _ et al .
_ , eur .
j. c * 50 * , 341 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv:0709.1664 [ hep - ph ] ] . | charged particle multiplicity distribution basic in high energy collisions abundance of experimental results theory problem poorly understood multiplicity distribution in proton - proton ( @xmath0 ) collisions parameterized by negative binomial ( nb ) distribution characterized by two parameters mean number of particles @xmath2 and @xmath3 deviation from poisson distribution @xmath4 @xmath5 nb distribution works well with limitations for broad range of energies total and limited phase - space rapidity bins @xmath3 is decreasing function of energy similar observations in electron - positron ( @xmath1 ) collisions nb works well for total and limited phase - space bins rapidity @xmath3 decreases with energy similarities between @xmath0 and @xmath1 important differences mean number of particles and @xmath3 larger in @xmath1 than @xmath0 gev in @xmath0 collisions comparison to @xmath8 in @xmath1 differences between @xmath0 and @xmath1 understood@xmath12 collisions large fraction energy @xmath6 carried by two leading protons not available for particle production explains larger mean multiplicity in @xmath1 leading proton effect not present leads relation between total mean number particles in @xmath0 and @xmath1 interactions mean number particles in @xmath0 @xmath6 given by mean number particles @xmath1 at @xmath14 plus two leading protons formula works from @xmath15 to @xmath16 gev fig @xmath17 verified at lhc energy similarities between @xmath1 ultra - relativistic au+au collisions at rhic reported universal mechanism particle production systems controlled by energy particle creation @xmath1 energy consumed by produced particles @xmath0 effective energy particle production given by @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 proton mass @xmath22 @xmath23 incoming leading proton momenta @xmath24 fraction of longitudinal momentum by leading proton @xmath25 @xmath26 eq mean_1 ) extended to whole multiplicity distributiondemonstrate nb small values @xmath3 @xmath0 results from nb @xmath1 effective energy @xmath0 problem multiplicity distribution complicated than mean number particles specify leading proton @xmath27 distribution choose beta distribution @xmath28it supported limited experimental results chapman:1973kn basile:1983 kb natural first choice obtain@xmath29which average momentum leading proton clarify @xmath30 related eq . mean_1 ] ) obtain two leading protons uncorrelated@xmath31taking@xmath32where @xmath33 arrive @xmath34it @xmath35 not related @xmath36 but @xmath37 latter calculated equation constrains parameters beta distribution assuming @xmath39 @xcite obtain @xmath40 @xmath41 determines @xmath42 multiplicity distribution @xmath0 collisions @xmath43 related to multiplicity @xmath1 interactions @xmath44 @xmath45where @xmath46 equation generalization eq . [ mean_2 ] ) calculating integral mean_2 calculations sampled @xmath47 @xmath48 two leading protons beta distribution @xmath30 @xmath49 @xmath50 calculate effective energy gev two pions produced@xmath51 for particle production @xmath0 choice of @xmath52 @xmath53 eq . ( mean_1 satisfied right coefficient @xmath35 sampled particles from multiplicity distribution @xmath1 collisions at @xmath54 nb with mean eq . ( [ n_ee ] @xmath55 @xmath59 @xmath60 rounded to nearest integer value nb with negative integer @xmath3 binomial distribution with number trials @xmath61 bernoulli success probability @xmath62 poisson distribution @xmath63 same results add two particles leading protons calculations at @xmath64 @xmath69 results shown in fig . calculated multiplicity distributions @xmath0 collisions compared with nb fits eq . ( [ mean_1 ] ) satisfied by construction multiplicity distributions correct mean values tab .calculated mean number of charged particles in @xmath0 collisions compared with experimental data explanation of multiplicity distributions in @xmath70 collisions goal problem multiplicity distributions @xmath0 reduced to @xmath1 fluctuating energy by two leading protonspaper focused on total phase - space multiplicity distributions plausible total number of particles determined by available energy not obvious for limited phase - space bins distribution particles in transverse momentum rapidity modified by nontrivial dynamics problem under investigation main uncertainty is leading proton @xmath27 distribution in eq . partly supported by existing data limited energies ranges educated guess assumed @xmath30 is energy independent not proven experimentally mild energy dependence indicated by theoretical studies batista:1998ry nb fits overestimate calculated multiplicity distributions for higher values of @xmath71 similar trend in experimental data @xmath72 @xmath73 extrapolate @xmath74 into higher energies using 3nlo qcd result @xcite identical to nlo qcd fit eq @xmath75 linear function of @xmath76 to lhc energies to extend study on colliding systems including proton - nucleus and nucleus - nucleus collisions akindinov:2007rrargued multiplicity @xmath0 collisions related to @xmath70 interactions leading proton effect accounted large fraction initial energy @xmath77 carried away by two protons not available for particle production fluctuates broader multiplicity distribution @xmath0 than @xmath1 new argument common mechanism particle production systems controlled by energy thank andrzej bialas discussions supported ministry science higher education foundation for polish science national science centre dec-2012/06/a / st2/00390 j f. grosse - oetringhaus k. reygers j. phys . g * 37 *, 083001 ( 2010 ) arxiv:0912.0023 ansorge ua5 collaboration . c * 43 *, 357 ( 1989 ) breakstone ames - bologna cern dortmund heidelberg warsaw collaboration phys . d * 30 *, 528 ( 1984 ) alexopoulos anderson biswas bujak carmony erwin gutay hirsch phys . lett b 435 *, 453 ( 1998 ) szwed wrochna wroblewski acta phys . b * 19 *, 763 ( 1988 )buskulic al aleph collaboration c 69 15 ( 1995 ) basile cara romeo cifarelli contin dali di cesare esposito p giusti phys . b 92 367 ( 1980 ) basile cara romeo cifarelli contin dali di cesare esposito giusti b 95 * 311 ( 1980 ) basile bonvicini cara romeo cifarelli contin curatolo dali del papa nuovo cim 73 * 329 ( 1983 ) batista j m. covolan . rev d 59 * 054006 ( 1999 ) hep - ph/9811425 sarkisyan s sakharov c * 70 * 533 ( 2010 ) arxiv:1004.4390 hep - ph back phobos collaboration phys . c * 74 * 021902 ( 2006 ) j w. chapman j w. cooper green seidl. van der velde bromberg d h cohen t ferbel phys . 32 * 257 ( 1974 ) basile bonvicini cara romeo cifarelli contin curatolodali del papa nuovo cim 38 359 ( 1983 ). ghosh phys 85 054017 ( 2012 ) arxiv:1202.4221 hep - ph dremin w. gary 349 301 ( 2001 ) hep - ph/0004215 a. akindinov alici. antonioli. arcelli. basile. cara romero chumakov l. cifarelli 50 341 ( 2007 ) arxiv:0709.1664 hep - ph | 0.50104 | 3,403 | 1,685 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,230 | the covariant entropy bound conjecture is an important hint for the quantum gravity , with several versions available in the literature .
for cosmology , ashtekar and wilson - ewing ever show the consistence between the loop gravity theory and one version of this conjecture .
recently , s. he and h. zhang proposed a version for the dynamical horizon of the universe , which validates the entropy bound conjecture for the cosmology filled with perfect fluid in the classical scenario when the universe is far away from the big bang singularity .
however , their conjecture breaks down near big bang region .
we examine this conjecture in the context of the loop quantum cosmology . with the example of photon gas
, this conjecture is protected by the quantum geometry effects as expected . | the thermodynamical property of spacetime is an important hint for the quantization of gravity . starting from hawking s discovery of black hole
s radiation @xcite , a theory of thermodynamics of spacetime is being constructed gradually .
recently , the second law of this thermodynamics was generalized to the covariant entropy bound conjecture @xcite .
it states that the entropy flux @xmath0 through any null hypersurface generated by geodesics with non - positive expansion , emanating orthogonally from a two - dimensional ( 2d ) spacelike surface of area @xmath1 , must satisfy @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the planck length .
here and in what follows , we adopt the units @xmath4 .
soon , flanagan , marolf and wald @xcite proposed a new version of the entropy bound conjecture .
if one allows the geodesics generating the null hypersurface from a 2d spacelike surface of area @xmath1 to terminate at another 2d spacelike surface of area @xmath5 before coming to a caustic , boundary or singularity of spacetime , one can replace the above conjecture with @xmath6 more recently , he and zhang related these conjectures to dynamical horizon and proposed a covariant entropy bound conjecture on the cosmological dynamical horizon @xcite : let @xmath7 be the area of the cosmological dynamical horizon at cosmological time @xmath8 , then the entropy flux @xmath0 through the cosmological dynamical horizon between time @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( @xmath10 ) must satisfy @xmath11 if the dominant energy condition holds for matter . as a non - perturbative and background - independent quantization of gravity , the loop quantum gravity ( lqg ) developed rapidly in recent years .
its cosmological version , the loop quantum cosmology ( lqc ) achieved many successes , including resolution of the classical singularity @xcite , quantum suppression of classical chaotic behavior near singularities @xcite , generic phase of inflation @xcite and more ( for example @xcite ) .
since it has been suggested that the holographic principle is a powerful hint and should be used as an essential building block for any quantum gravity theory @xcite , it is important and tempting to investigate the covariant entropy bound conjecture in the framework of the lqc , which is a successful application of the non - perturbative quantum gravity scheme the lqg .
the authors of @xcite investigated the bousso s covariant entropy bound @xcite with a cosmology filled with photon gas and found that the conjecture is violated near the big bang in the classical scenario .
but they found the lqc can protect this conjecture even in the deep quantum region . in @xcite , he and zhang proposed a new version of the entropy bound conjecture for the dynamical horizon in cosmology and validated it through a cosmology filled with adiabatic perfect fluid , governed by the classical einstein equation when the universe is far away from the big bang singularity .
but when the universe approaches the big bang singularity , the strong quantum fluctuation does break down their conjecture .
in analogy to ashtekar and wilson - ewing s result @xcite , one may wonder if he and zhang s conjecture can also be protected by the quantum geometry effect of the lqg . following @xcite , we use photon gas as an example to investigate this problem . as expected , we find that the loop quantum effects can indeed protect the conjecture .
besides the result of @xcite , our result presents one more evidence for the consistence between the loop gravity and the covariant entropy conjecture .
this paper is organized as follows . in sec .
[ sec.2 ] , we briefly review the framework of the effective lqc and describe the covariant entropy bound conjecture proposed by he and zhang @xcite . then in sec .
[ sec.3 ] , we test this conjecture with cosmology filled with photon gas , and show that the lqc is able to protect the conjecture in all .
we conclude the paper in sec .
[ sec.4 ] and discuss the implications .
to a good degree of approximation , the universe can be described by the well - known friedmann - robertson - walker ( frw ) metric , @xmath12 which describes a homogeneous and isotropic universe . here the spatial curvature @xmath13 correspond to open , flat and closed universes respectively , and @xmath14 is the scale factor of the universe . for simplicity
we focus on a flat universe in this paper . in the lqc ,
the phase space for a flat universe is spanned by the coordinates @xmath15 , being the gravitational gauge connection , and @xmath16 , being the densitized triad .
@xmath17 is the barbero - immirzi parameter @xcite .
then the effective hamiltonian in the lqc is given by @xcite @xmath18 the variable @xmath19 corresponds to the dimensionless length of the edge of the elementary loop and is given by @xmath20 where @xmath21 and @xmath22 depend on the particular scheme in the holonomy corrections . in this paper
we take the @xmath19-scheme , which gives @xmath23 and @xmath24 . with this effective hamiltonian
, we have the canonical equation @xmath25 or , @xmath26 combining with the constraint on the hamiltonian , @xmath27 , we obtain the modified friedmann equation , @xmath28 in terms of the hubble rate @xmath29 , where @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
@xmath32 is the critical energy density coming from the quantum effect in the lqc .
it is a large quantity and when it goes to infinity all the quantum effects disappear .
according to @xcite , the cosmological dynamical horizon @xcite is defined geometrically as a three - dimensional hypersurface foliated by spheres , where at least one orthogonal null congruence with vanishing expansion exists . for a sphere characterized by any value of @xmath33 , there are two future directed null directions @xmath34 satisfying geodesic equation @xmath35 .
the expansion of these null directions is @xmath36 where the dot denotes differential with respect to @xmath8 , and the sign @xmath37 represents the null direction pointing to larger ( smaller ) values of @xmath38 . for an expanding universe ,
i.e. @xmath39 , @xmath40 determines the location of the dynamical horizon , @xmath41 , by the definition of dynamical horizon given above .
the lqc replaces the big bang with the big bounce , so the universe is symmetric with respect to the point of the bounce , expanding on one side of the bounce and contracting on the other side .
the dynamical horizon in the contracting stage of the lqc corresponds to @xmath42 , and all of the relations are similar to the ones given here . in this paper
we only consider the expanding stage for the lqc , but note that the contracting stage is the same .
since the area of the dynamical horizon is @xmath43 , the covariant entropy bound conjecture in our question becomes @xmath44,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath0 is the entropy flux through the dynamical horizon between cosmological time @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( @xmath10 ) , and @xmath45 is the hubble parameter . considering that the cosmology model discussed here is isotropic and homogeneous
, we can write the entropy current vector as @xmath46 where @xmath47 is the ordinary comoving entropy density , independent of space .
if the entropy current of the perfect fluid is conserved , i.e. , @xmath48 , @xmath47 will be independent of @xmath8 as well .
for simplicity we restrict ourselves to this special case . the entropy flux through the dynamical horizon ( shown in fig.[fig1 ] )
is given by @xmath49 where @xmath50 is the spacetime volume 4-form .
so the conjecture is reduced to @xmath51 and @xmath9 respectively .
the dashed lines are the entropy current.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]
given that the frw universe is filled with photon gas , the energy momentum tensor can be expressed as @xmath52\right\ } .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the pressure @xmath53 and the energy density @xmath54 satisfy a fixed equation of state @xmath55 where the constant @xmath56 . from @xmath57 , we have the conservation equation @xmath58 the comoving entropy density @xmath47 is given by @xmath59 and @xmath54 depends only on the temperature @xmath60 , @xmath61 where @xmath62 is a dimensionless constant depending on the density of energy state of the perfect fluid . for photon gas @xmath63 .
plugging above thermodynamics relation into equation ( [ entropydensity ] ) we get @xmath64 . written the above conservation equation as @xmath65 we have an integration constant @xmath66 . then @xmath67 . combining our equation of state eq .
( [ eos ] ) with the above conservation equation , we get the relationship between @xmath54 and the hubble parameter , @xmath68 substituting the above relation ( [ relationh ] ) into the modified friedmann equation ( [ friemann ] ) , we can get @xmath69 where @xmath70 is an integration constant without direct physical significance , and we can always drop it by resetting the time coordinate . setting @xmath71
gives @xmath72 with the definition of the hubble parameter , we can integrate once again to get @xmath73^{\frac{1}{3(1+\omega)}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] when @xmath32 goes to infinity , all of the above solutions become the same as the classical ones , while we use universe time @xmath8 in this paper .
@xmath74 can be negative which divides the discussion into two cases .
@xmath8 is always positive and makes the discussion simpler . ]
presented in @xcite . in the classical scenario , @xmath75 when @xmath76 , @xmath77 which is a decreasing function of @xmath8 , so the conjecture breaks down when the universe approaches the big bang singularity . and its derivative respect to @xmath78 for photon gas.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]
we introduce a new variable @xmath79 for the lqc to simplify the above expressions to @xmath80 then @xmath81 .
\nonumber \\\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is obvious that the necessary and sufficient condition for meeting the covariant entropy bound conjecture is that the above expression increases with @xmath78 . in order to investigate the monotone property of above function , we plot @xmath82 itself and its derivative respect to @xmath78 in fig.[photon ] .
the minimal value of the derivative is about @xmath83 .
the covariant entropy bound conjecture for dynamical horizon in cosmology is fully protected by loop quantum effect .
the covariant entropy bound conjecture comes from the holographic principle and is an important hint for the quantum gravity theory . in the recent years we have witnessed more and more success of the loop quantum gravity , especially for the problem of the big bang singularity in cosmology .
the entropy bound conjecture usually breaks down in the strong gravity region of spacetime where the quantum fluctuation is strong , and one would expect the loop quantum correction to protect the conjecture from the quantum fluctuation
. and ashtekar and wilson - ewing do find a result in @xcite which is consistent with above expectation . in this paper , we generalized the covariant entropy conjecture for the cosmological dynamical horizon proposed in @xcite to the loop quantum cosmology scenario .
we found that the quantum geometry effects of the loop quantum gravity can also protect the conjecture .
our result gives out one more evidence for the consistence of covariant entropy conjecture and loop quantum gravity theory .
this adds one more encouraging result of loop quantum gravity theory besides previous ones .
hua - hui xiong and jian - yang zhu , phys .
d * 75 * , 084023 ( 2007 ) .
li - fang li and jian - yang zhu , phys .
d * 79 * , 044011 ( 2009 ) ; phys .
d * 79 * , 124011 ( 2009 ) ; advances in high energy physics , doi:10.1155/2009/905705 . | thermodynamical property spacetime for quantization gravity hawking s discovery black hole radiation theory of thermodynamics spacetime constructed second law generalized to covariant entropy bound conjecture entropy flux @xmath0 through null hypersurface by geodesics non - positive expansion from surface @xmath1 satisfy @xmath2 @xmath3 planck length adopt units @xmath4 flanagan marolf wald proposed new version conjecture geodesics null hypersurface terminate at @xmath5 before singularity spacetime replace conjecture with @xmath6 he zhang related conjectures to dynamical horizon proposed covariant entropy bound conjecture on cosmological dynamical horizon @xmath7 area horizon at time @xmath8 entropy flux @xmath0 through horizon between @xmath8 and @xmath9 must satisfy @xmath11 if dominant energy condition holds for matter non - perturbative background - independent quantization gravity loop quantum gravity ( lqg ) developed rapidlycosmological loop quantum cosmology ( lqc ) achieved successes resolution classical singularity quantum suppression of chaotic behavior near singularities generic phase of inflation holographic principle powerful hint essential block for quantum gravity theory important to investigate covariant entropy bound conjecture in framework lqc successful application of non - perturbative quantum gravity scheme authors @xcite investigated bousso s covariant entropy bound with cosmology photon gas found conjecture violated near big bang lqc conjecture in deep quantum region in @xcite he and zhang proposed new version entropy bound conjecture for dynamical horizon cosmology validated through cosmology adiabatic perfect fluid governed by classical einstein equation when universe far from big bang singularity big strong quantum fluctuation conjecture result if he and zhang s conjecture protected by quantum geometry effect of lqg following use photon gas example to investigate problem loop quantum effects protect conjecture result presents evidence for consistence between loop gravity covariant entropy conjecture paper organizedreview framework effective lqc describe covariant entropy conjecture proposed by he zhang @xcite test conjecture with cosmology photon gas lqc conjecture conclude paper.4 discuss implications universe described by friedmann - robertson - walker metric @xmath12 homogeneous isotropic universe spatial curvature @xmath13 open flat closed universes @xmath14 scale factor focus on flat universe phase space flat universe spanned by coordinates @xmath15 gravitational gauge connection @xmath16 densitized triad @xmath17 barbero - immirzi parameter @xcite effective hamiltonian lqc given by @xcite @xmath18 variable @xmath19 dimensionless length of edge elementary loop given by @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 depend on scheme holonomy corrections @xmath19-scheme gives @xmath23 and @xmath24 effective hamiltonian canonical equation @xmath25 @xmath26 constraint on hamiltonian @xmath27 modified friedmann equation @xmath28 hubble rate @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 critical energy density from quantum effect in lqclarge quantity infinity quantum effects disappear @xcite cosmological dynamical horizon three - dimensional hypersurface by spheres one orthogonal null congruence with vanishing expansion sphere @xmath33 two future null directions @xmath34 geodesic equation @xmath35 expansion of null directions is @xmath36 dot differential @xmath8 sign @xmath37 null direction to values @xmath38 expanding universe @xmath39 @xmath40 determines location dynamical horizon @xmath41 lqc replaces big bang with big bounce universe symmetric point bounce expanding side contracting other dynamical horizon in contracting stage lqc corresponds to @xmath42 relations similar expanding stage lqc contracting stage same area dynamical horizon is @xmath43 covariant entropy bound conjecture becomes @xmath44 @xmath0 entropy flux through dynamical horizon between cosmological time @xmath8 and @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath45 hubble parameter cosmology model isotropic homogeneous entropy current vector as @xmath46 @xmath47 ordinary comoving entropy density independent of spaceentropy current perfect fluid conserved @xmath48 @xmath47 independent of @xmath8 restrict special case entropy flux through dynamical horizon fig given by @xmath49 @xmath50 spacetime volume 4-form conjecture reduced to @xmath51 @xmath9 dashed lines entropy current universe filled with photon gas energy momentum tensor expressed as @xmath52 pressure @xmath53 energy density @xmath54 satisfy fixed equation state @xmath55 constant @xmath56 conservation equation @xmath58 entropy density @xmath47 by @xmath59 @xmath54 depends on temperature @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 dimensionless constant density energy state fluid photon gas @xmath63 thermodynamics relation equation entropydensity @xmath64 conservation equation @xmath65 integration constant @xmath66 @xmath67 equation state conservation equation relationship between @xmath54 hubble parameter @xmath68 substituting relation into modified friedmann equation @xmath69 @xmath70 integration constant without direct physical significance drop by resetting time coordinate@xmath71 gives @xmath72 definition hubble parameter integrate get @xmath73^{\frac{1}{3(1+\omega)}} @xmath32 infinity solutions same classical use universe time @xmath8 paper @xmath74 negative divides discussion two cases @xmath8 positive makes discussion simpler presented @xcite classical scenario @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 decreasing function @xmath8 conjecture breaks down universe approaches big bang singularity derivative respect to @xmath78 photon gas introduce new variable @xmath79 lqc simplify expressions @xmath80 @xmath81 necessary condition covariant entropy bound conjecture expression increases with @xmath78 investigate monotone property plot @xmath82 derivative respect @xmath78 fig.[photon ] minimal value derivative @xmath83 covariant entropy bound conjecture dynamical horizon cosmology protected by loop quantum effect holographic principle important hint quantum gravity theory success loop quantum gravity problem big bang singularity entropy bound conjecture breaks down strong gravity region spacetime quantum fluctuation strong loop quantum correction protect conjecture quantum fluctuationashtekar wilson - ewing result @xcite consistent expectation generalized covariant entropy conjecture cosmological horizon loop quantum cosmology scenario quantum geometry effects loop gravity protect conjecture result consistence covariant entropy conjecture loop quantum gravity theory adds encouraging result gravity theory hua - hui xiong jian - yang zhu phys d 75 084023 ( 2007 li - fang li jian - yang zhu 79 044011 ( 2009 124011 2009 advances high energy physics doi:10.1155/2009/905705 | 0.433677 | 2,728 | 1,419 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,239 | we calculate the branching ratio of the non - resonant @xmath0 decay using a simple model based on the framework of the factorization approach where one can ommit the nonfactorization effects . in naive factorization approach
, there are only two tree diagrams for this decay mode . in the first diagram ,
the matrix element of decay mode is factorized into a @xmath1 form factor multiplied by a @xmath2 decay constant and in the second diagram , the matrix element is factorized into a @xmath3 form factor multiplied by a @xmath4 decay constant , we assume that in the rest frame of b meson , the @xmath5 meson remains stationary , so we obtain the value @xmath6 for the branching ratio of the @xmath0 decay mode , while the experimental results are @xmath7 . | the three - body and four - body decays of @xmath8 meson are more complicated than two - body case , specifically where both non - resonant and resonant contribution exist . in this
types the theoretical momentums of the output particles are not directly calculable . in four - body cases ,
the momentums and form factors are written in terms of five variables : two invariant - mass of particles variable and three angles .
+ in the previous works @xcite , for some specific three - body decays assumed that one of the output mesons due to its heavy weigh , remains stationary and the two other output mesons move back to back and the amplitude of this three decay modes can be calculate . in this work we extended this assumption to
non - resonant four - body decays and calculate the branching ratio of @xmath0 decay in naive factorization approach where we can ignore the non - factorization effects .
we assume that the @xmath5 output meson , due to its heavy weight , remains stationary and the three pion mesons move in a plane and we have directly resolved their momentums and we calculated the branching ratio of @xmath9 and predicted @xmath6 which is compatible with the experimental result @xmath10 .
+ this paper is organized as follows . in section 2
we consider the amplitudes of the @xmath9 decay and we present the transition matrix needed and the kinematics of the four - body decays . in section 3
we give the numerical results , and in the last section we have a summary .
for the four - body @xmath11 , the feynman diagrams are shown in fig .
1 , where both panel show the @xmath12 tree transitions @xcite . under the factorization approach ,
the contribution of the diagram ( a ) in decay amplitude consists of the @xmath13 distinct factorization term , where @xmath14 denotes the form factor of @xmath8 to @xmath5 meson transitional , and the contribution of the diagram ( b ) consists of a @xmath15 distinct factorization term , where @xmath16 denotes the two - meson transition matrix element . decay . ]
so the matrix elements of the @xmath11 decay amplitudes are given by @xmath17 where in factorization , the general expression of the @xmath18 quantities in terms of effective wilson coefficients is @xcite @xmath19 according to fig .
1(a ) , the form factor of @xmath8 meson to @xmath5 meson is defined as fallow @xcite @xmath20}f_1(q^2 ) \nonumber \\ & & + \frac{m_b^2-m_d^2}{(p_b - p_4)^2}(p_b - p_4)_\mu f_0(q^2),\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the point like 3-body matrix element is assumed to be @xcite @xmath21}. \nonumber \\\end{aligned}\ ] ] according to fig .
1(b ) , for the current - induced process , the two - meson transition matrix element @xmath22 has the fallowing general expression @xcite @xmath23 where the form factors @xmath24 and @xmath25 for the non - resonant decay are given by @xmath26 @xmath27}+\frac{f_b}{2f_\pi^2},\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath28}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the tow - body @xmath29 matrix element can be related to the @xmath5 and @xmath30 matrix element of the weak interaction current : @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the @xmath5 to @xmath30 transition form factor and determined from experiment @xcite . for four - body @xmath8
decays , we can work in the rest frame of the b meson . by following the definition given in @xcite ,
when b meson decays to final - state mesons , the kinematics of the four - body decays can be described in term of five independent variables where the momenta and masses are defined as @xmath33 with @xmath34 and @xmath35 where @xmath36 and @xmath37 .
we choose the set of independent variables as @xmath38 which have the following geometrical meaning ( see fig .
( 2 ) ) * @xmath39 , is the invariant - mass of particles 1 and 2 ; * @xmath40 , is the invariant - mass of particles 3 and 4 ; * @xmath41 , is the angle between the three - momentum of particle 1 ( particle 3 ) with respect to the direction of @xmath42 ( @xmath43 defined in the rest frame of the decaying particle ( see fig.(2 ) ) ; * @xmath44 is the angle between the planes defined by particles ( 1 , 2 ) and ( 3 , 4 ) also in the rest frame of the decaying particle . .
we have defined @xmath45 , such that @xmath46 . ] with this choice of kinematics , the differential decay rate in the rest frame of the decaying particle can be written as : @xmath47 where @xmath48 ) is the velocity of particle 1 ( particle 3 ) in the center of mass frame of particles 1 and 2 ( 3 and 4 ) and @xmath49^{1/2}$ ] , the @xmath50 factor accounts for identical particles in the phase space and @xmath51 is the amplitude of the decay ( eq.(1 ) ) . + for considering the @xmath0 decay mode , we work in the rest frame of the @xmath8 meson and assume that the @xmath52 meson due to its heavy weight , has a small momentum and can easily be neglected , so the three pions move in a plane . hence the momentums of @xmath8 meson and final - state mesons are given by @xmath53 where @xmath54 and @xmath55 .
now we can easily integrate the decay rate with respect to all independent variables and we obtain a simple experiment @xmath56
the wilson coefficients @xmath57 have been calculated in different schemes . in this paper
we use consistently the naive dimensional regularization ( ndr ) scheme .
the values of @xmath57 at the scales @xmath58 at the leading order ( lo ) are @xcite @xmath59 the parameter @xmath60 in the form factors , determined from the @xmath61 decay is @xmath62 for the elements of the ckm matrix , we use the values of the wolfenstein parameters and obtain @xcite @xmath63 the meson masses , decay constants and form factors needed in our calculations are taken as ( in units of gev ) @xcite @xmath64 using the parameters relevant for the @xmath0 decay , we calculate the branching ratio of this decay which is @xmath65 where the experimental value is @xcite @xmath66
in this work , we have considered four - body @xmath67 decays under the assumption that the @xmath5 meson has small and negligible momentum due to its heavy weight .
this decay mode have contribution of @xmath68 and @xmath69 coefficients . according to the feynman diagrams ,
each contribution factorized into a form factor and a decay constant . under the assumption of negligible momentum of d meson ,
the three output pion mesons move in a plane and we have directly resolved their momentums and we calculated the branching ratio of @xmath9 and predicted @xmath6 which is compatible with the experimental result @xmath10 .
10 behnam mohammadi and hossein mehraban,_``study of the @xmath70 decay '' _ , phys.rev .
d * 89*(9):095026 , 2014 . behnam mohammadi and hossein mehraban .
_ `` three - body decays of @xmath71''_. eur.phys.j .
a**50**:122 , 2014 .
michael gronau , oscar f. hernandez , david london , and jonathan l. rosner .
_ `` broken su(3 ) symmetry in two - body b decays''_. phys.rev .
d**52**:63566373 , 1995 .
mahiko suzuki .
_ `` selection rules in three - body b decay from factoriza - tion''_. phys.rev .
d**62**:091502 , 2000 .
s. fajfer , r.j .
oakes , and t.n .
_ `` the penguin operators in non - resonant @xmath72 decays''_. phys.rev .
d**60**:054029 , 1999 .
k. terasaki .
_ `` nonfactorizable long distance contributions in color sup - pressed decays of b mesons''_. int.j.mod.phys .
a * 13*:43254338 , 1998 .
a. ali , c. greub , _ `` an analysis of two - body non - leptonic b decays involving light mesons in the standard model''_. phys.rev.d . * 57*:2996 - 3016 , 1998 .
[ arxiv : hep - ph/9707251 ] hai - yang cheng and kwei - chou yang .
_ `` nonresonant three - body decays of d and b mesons''_. phys.rev .
d * 66*:054015 , 2002 . b. bajc , s. fajfer , r.j .
oakes , t.n .
pham , and sasa prelovsek .
_ `` the cp violating asymmetry in @xmath73 decays''_. phys.lett .
b * 447*:313 320 , 1999 .
tomoko iwashita .
_ `` search for a @xmath74 resonance in@xmath75 decay at belle''_. 2012 .
n. quintero , g. lopez castro , and d. delepine .
_ `` lepton number violation in top quark and neutral b meson decays''_. phys.rev .
d * 84*:096011,2011 .
gabriel lopez castro and nestor quintero .
_ `` lepton number violating four - body tau lepton decays''_. phys.rev .
d * 85*:076006 , 2012 .
m. beneke , g. buchalla , m. neubert , and christopher t. sachrajda .
_ `` qcd factorization in @xmath76 decays and extraction of wolfenstein parameters''_. nucl.phys .
b * 606*:245321 , 2001 .
claude amsler et al .
review of particle physics .
b * 667*:11340 , 2008 . k.a .
olive et al .
review of particle physics .
c * 38*:090001 , 2014 .
ying - ying fan , wen - fei wang , shan cheng , and zhen - jun xiao .
_ `` semileptonic decays @xmath77 in the perturbative qcd factorization approach''_. chin.sci.bull . * 59*:125132 , 2014 . | three four - body decays of @xmath8 meson complicated than two - body non - resonant resonant contribution exist theoretical momentums output particles not calculable four - body cases momentums form factors written five variables two invariant - mass three angles previous works three - body decays assumed one output remains stationary two other move extended assumption to non - resonant four - body decays calculate branching ratio of @xmath0 decay naive factorization approach assume @xmath5 output meson remains stationary three mesons move in plane resolved momentums calculated branching ratio of @xmath9 predicted @xmath6 compatible with experimental result @xmath10 paper organized section 2 amplitudes @xmath9 decay transition matrix kinematics of four - body decays section 3 numerical results last section summary four - body @xmath11 feynman diagrams shown in fig . 1 show @xmath12 tree transitionsfactorization approach contribution diagram a ) decay amplitude @xmath13 factorization term @xmath14 form factor @xmath8 to @xmath5 meson transitional diagram b ) @xmath15 factorization term @xmath16 two - meson transition matrix element matrix elements @xmath11 decay amplitudes @xmath17 factorization general expression @xmath18 quantities effective wilson coefficients @xcite @xmath19 fig . 1(a ) form factor @xmath8 to @xmath5 meson @xcite @xmath20}f_1(q^2 3-body matrix element @xcite @xmath21} fig . 1(b ) current - induced process two - meson transition matrix element @xmath22 general expression @xcite @xmath23 form factors @xmath24 @xmath25 non - resonant decay @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28}tow - body @xmath29 matrix element related to @xmath5 @xmath30 matrix element weak interaction current @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath5 to @xmath30 transition form factor determined from experiment @xcite four - body @xmath8 decays rest frame b meson definition @xcite b meson decays to final - state mesons kinematics four - body decays described five independent variables momenta masses defined as @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 independent variables @xmath38 geometrical meaning @xmath39 invariant - mass of particles 1 2 @xmath40 invariant - mass particles 3 4 @xmath41 angle between three - momentum particle 1 3 direction @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 angle between planes particles 1 2 3 4 defined @xmath45 @xmath46 differential decay rate rest frame decaying particle written as @xmath47 @xmath48 velocity of particle 1 3 in center of mass frame particles 1 2 @xmath49 @xmath50 factor accounts for identical particles phase space @xmath51 amplitude of decay@xmath0 decay mode work rest frame @xmath8 meson assume @xmath52 meson heavy weight small momentum neglected three pions move plane momentums @xmath8 final - state mesons given @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 integrate decay rate independent variables obtain simple experiment @xmath56 wilson coefficients @xmath57 calculated different schemes use naive regularization scheme values @xmath57 @xmath58 @xcite @xmath59 parameter @xmath60 form factors @xmath61 decay @xmath62 elements ckm matrix use values wolfenstein parameters obtain @xcite @xmath63 meson masses decay constants form factors units gev @xcite @xmath64 parameters @xmath0 decay calculate branching ratio decay @xmath65 experimental value @xcite @xmath66 considered four - body @xmath67 decays @xmath5 meson small negligible momentum heavy weight decay mode contribution @xmath68 @xmath69 coefficients feynman diagrams each contribution form factor decay constantnegligible momentum d meson three output mesons move plane resolved momentums calculated branching ratio @xmath9 predicted @xmath6 compatible experimental result @xmath10 behnam mohammadi hossein mehraban @xmath70 decay.rev 89*(9):095026 2014 three - body decays eur.phys.j a**50**:122 2014 michael gronau hernandez david london jonathan rosner broken symmetry two - body b.rev d**52**:63566373 1995 mahiko suzuki selection rules three - body b decay.rev d**62**:091502 2000 fajfer oakes penguin operators non - resonant @xmath72 phys.rev d**60**:054029 1999 terasaki nonfactorizable long distance contributions color sup - pressed decays int.j.mod.phys 13*:43254338 1998 analysis two - body non - leptonic b decays light mesons standard.rev.d 57*:2996 - 3016 1998 hai - yang cheng kwei - chou yang nonresonant three - body decays d bphys.rev 66*:054015 2002 bajc fajfer oakes pham sasa prelovsek cp violating asymmetry @xmath73.lett 447*:313 320 1999 tomoko iwashita @xmath74 resonance@xmath75 decay 2012 quintero lopez castro d delepine lepton number violation top quark neutral meson.rev 84*:096011 gabriel lopez castro nestor quintero lepton number violating four - body tau lepton 85*:076006 2012 beneke neubert christopher sachrajda qcd factorization @xmath76 decays extraction wolfenstein nucl.phys 606*:245321 2001 claude amsler particle 667*:11340 2008 olive 38*:090001 2014 ying - fan wen - fei wang shan cheng zhen - jun xiao semileptonic decays @xmath77 perturbative qcd factorization chin.sci.bull 59*:125132 2014 | 0.353851 | 2,468 | 1,307 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,245 | by using the method of hyperspherical functions within the appropriate for this method @xmath0 approximation , the simple three - cluster model for description of the ground state and the continuous spectrum states of @xmath1he is developed .
it is shown that many properties of @xmath1he ( its large rms radius and large values of the matrix elements of electromagnetic transitions from the ground state into the continuous spectrum ) follow from the fact that the potential energy of @xmath1he system decreases very slowly ( as @xmath2 ) and the binding energy is small . | the @xmath1he nucleus is an example of a three - cluster system whose lowest threshold ( @xmath3 ) is a three - particle one .
such systems have a number of remarkable properties determined mainly by two factors the pauli principle and the character of the potential energy dependence due to the three - body structure .
the pauli principle imposes essential restrictions on the wave function of a system allowing it to contain only the components antisymmetric with respect to nucleon permutation .
thus , if we are using the expansion over the harmonic - oscillator basis , we must solve the problem of excluding the states forbidden by the pauli principle @xcite .
this , in particular , leads to the fact that the simplest wave function of the @xmath4-state of @xmath1he obtained with the translation - invariant shell model ( it coincides with the lowest oscillator - basis function ) is a superposition of states with three - particle hypermomentum @xmath5 ( @xmath6% ) and @xmath7 ( @xmath8 ) .
this function generates an infinite set of states differing by a number of oscillator quanta and having almost the same ratio of @xmath5 and @xmath7 components . the approximation using only this set of functions
can be appropriately called the @xmath0-approximation .
other basis states contain components with @xmath9 whose weight is small , as shown in @xcite .
notice that for @xmath10-states , wave functions of the @xmath0-approximation contain only @xmath7 components , while for the @xmath11-states they are the superpositions of @xmath12 ( @xmath13[1.ex]{\mbox{$\,\stackrel{\scriptstyle>}{\scriptscriptstyle \sim}\,$}}}}25\%}$ ] ) and @xmath14 ( @xmath13[1.ex]{\mbox{$\,\stackrel{\scriptstyle<}{\scriptscriptstyle \sim}\,$}}}}75\%}$ ] ) components .
the second characteristic feature of systems under consideration is the slow decrease of their potential energy for large values of the hyperradius @xmath15 .
as known ( see for example @xcite ) , in three - body systems , the potential energy has the asymptotical behaviour @xmath16 as @xmath17 , even if the two - body forces acting between any two of constituent particles are short - range .
this fact leads to two important results .
first , the boundary of a system is extremely loose and the rms radius is significantly larger compared with that of those neighbouring nuclei whose three - particle threshold is much higher than the binary one .
second , the phase shift of the three - body scattering rises sharply at low energies ( it is proportional to @xmath18 as @xmath19 ) which directly affects the behaviour of the electromagnetic transitions matrix elements between the ground state of @xmath1he and its continuous spectrum .
the aim of the present paper is to give a detailed quantitative analysis of general regularities in @xmath1he structure , based on a simple model taking into account the main features of a loosely - bound system with the lowest three - particle threshold .
the allowed basis functions for states with zero angular momentum @xmath20 of the @xmath0-approximation have the following form _
n(l=0 ) = a_0(n)_n0()u_0 ( ) + a_2(n)_n2()u_2 ( ) , where the superposition coefficients are a_0(n ) = , a_2(n ) = , @xmath21 are the hyperspherical functions , _ nk ( ) = n_nk ^k e^-^2/2 l^k+2_n(^2 ) are the normalized hyperradial harmonic - oscillator basis functions , @xmath22 are the laguerre polynomials , @xmath23 are the normalizing coefficients , @xmath24 therefore , the wave function of the @xmath25 state in the @xmath0-approximation is reduced to the expansion ( l=0 ) = _
[ 3 ] for all @xmath26 , the contribution of @xmath7 states is significantly greater than that of the @xmath5 states 0.86 <
a_2 ^ 2(n ) < 0.96 ; a_0 ^ 2(n ) = 1 - a_2 ^ 2(n ) , hence , in a simple model , the contribution of @xmath5 states can be neglected .
then , for the expansion ( [ 3 ] ) the following relations hold ( l=0 ) = _ n=0^ c_n _ n2()u_2 ( ) = ( ) u_2 ( ) = ( ) ^5/2 u_2 ( ) .
the function @xmath27 should satisfy the one - dimensional schrdinger equation + v()= e , [ 5 ] where @xmath28 is the nucleon mass , @xmath29 is the hypermomentum ( @xmath7 for @xmath25 ) , @xmath30 is the effective three - body potential .
the equation ( [ 5 ] ) is a starting point for the subsequent discussion .
it was solved by a numerical integration over @xmath15 from zero to a certain sufficiently large cutoff radius @xmath31 .
the effective potential is modelled by a function v ( ) = v_0 , [ 6 ] having correct asymptotics and without a singularity at @xmath32 . to reproduce the states with zero angular momentum
, we have chosen the parameters @xmath33 and @xmath34 such that the equation ( [ 5 ] ) would give experimental values for the @xmath1he binding energy and the rms radius , @xmath35 mev , @xmath36 fm .
the appropriate values of the parameters are v_0 = -87 mev , a = 3.073 fm . with these values
we have calculated the wave function of the @xmath1he ground state and @xmath4-states of its continuous spectrum .
the wave function of the ground state of @xmath1he together with the effective potential @xmath30 are presented in fig . 1
. the horizontal line below the @xmath15-axis corresponds to the ground state energy , its intersection with the potential energy curve marks the classical turning point .
the vertical line separates the values of @xmath15 less than @xmath37 fm .
the wave function falls as @xmath38 for small @xmath15 , due to the strong kinematical barrier , while for large @xmath15 , the long - range character of the potential @xmath30 leads to the slow decrease of the wave function and , respectively , to a significant diffuseness of the boundary of a nuclear system . as known
, loosely - bound binary systems with a short - range potential can be rather well approximated outside the potential range by the exponential function ( ) ( -r ) , = , [ 8 ] where @xmath39 is the bound state energy , @xmath40 is the radial variable of the binary channel .
the formal criterion of validity of such an approximation ( the zero - range approximation ) is the smallness of a ratio of the potential range and the cluster radii to the system radius @xmath41 expressed in terms of binding energy .
it seems useful to compare the exact wave function obtained after the solution of eq .
( [ 5 ] ) with the approximation given by eq . ( [ 8 ] ) ( for @xmath42 fm@xmath43 , dashed line in fig . 1 ) .
it can be seen that the nucleon system is much more loose than it is predicted by the wave function ( [ 8 ] ) .
the reason for that is not only that the function @xmath27 at small @xmath15 behaves as @xmath38 as @xmath44 , but first of all that the effective potential energy decreases slower than the exponential , while the formula ( [ 8 ] ) is obtained by supposing that the potential is short - range . as a result ,
the estimates of the square of hyperradius mean value @xmath45 based on ( [ 8 ] ) are about three times less than the experimental value .
of course , for sufficiently large @xmath15 the function @xmath27 has the asymptotics ( ) ck_4 ( ) c ( - ) , [ 10 ] where @xmath46 is the macdonald function , and the value of the coefficient @xmath47 ( it is related to the so - called nuclear vertex constants , see @xcite ) is considerably less than that of @xmath48 c 0.12 fm^-1/2 < 0.66 fm^-1/2 .
this asymptotics is denoted by short - dashed line in fig . 1 .
of the special interest are the solutions of eq .
( [ 5 ] ) for the continuous spectrum for relatively low over - threshold energies .
in particular , attention must be paid to the question of the behaviour of the three - to - three scattering phase @xmath50 as a function of energy in a potential field with the asymptotical behaviour @xmath51 and the powerful kinematic barrier @xmath52 corresponding to @xmath7 .
according to the estimates @xcite , at low energies , the phase shift , as is also demonstrated by our calculations , is proportional to @xmath53 ( or @xmath18 ) ak + ; a = 3.95 fm .
the low - energy values of @xmath54 calculated with different values of the cutoff radius @xmath31 are presented as functions of @xmath53 in fig .
2 . as seen , @xmath31 should be rather large , at least 1000 fm for energies below 10 kev .
the obtained value of @xmath55 gives a rather reasonable prediction for the ground - state energy of @xmath1he _ approx .
= ^22m1a^2 1.3 mev , ( cf .
= 0.97 mev ) .
the three - body phase shift @xmath50 calculated with different @xmath31 as functions of energy @xmath56 in an interval up to 5 mev are presented in fig .
as seen , for reliable calculations for medium - energy region ( @xmath57 mev ) @xmath31 may be taken about 50 fm and only for the lowest energies it must be increased .
the phase shift rises steeply from zero to values exceeding @xmath58 for @xmath59 and then slowly goes down . when the phase shift is near @xmath58 the first maximum of the wave function moves closer to zero so that the matrix element of the isoscalar transition from the ground state into the continuous spectrum increases ( see fig . 4 ) .
this matrix element reaches its maximal value for @xmath60 mev which could directly affect the electrodisintegration cross - section of @xmath1he .
the @xmath0-approximation satisfying the pauli principle for the @xmath10-states of @xmath1he contain only the hyperspherical function with @xmath7 .
therefore , to obtain the wave functions @xmath27 of @xmath10-states , we again turn to the equation ( [ 5 ] ) with @xmath7 but with the other parameters of the potential @xmath30 .
the @xmath1he nucleus has no @xmath10 bound state but it has a @xmath10-resonance at the energy of 0.822@xmath610.025 mev with the width 0.113@xmath610.020 mev @xcite . the energy and the width of the resonance can be reproduced with the following parameters of potential : v_0 = -92 mev , a = 2.834 fm . [
17 ] the wave function @xmath27 of the resonance state and the potential energy with the parameters ( [ 17 ] ) are presented in fig .
5 . for small @xmath15
the resonance wave function behaves similarly to the wave function of the ground state ( dashed line in fig . 5 )
but for larger @xmath15 , in the asymptotical region it , as it should be , oscillates .
the scattering phase shift in the @xmath10-state obtained by solving the equation ( [ 5 ] ) with the new potential parameters is presented in fig .
6 . at the energy of about 1
mev the phase shift has a typical behaviour for a resonance region .
we have also calculated the matrix element of the operator of the isoscalar @xmath62 transition from the ground state of @xmath1he to the @xmath10-states of its continuous spectrum .
the dependence of this matrix element upon the energy is presented in fig .
the narrow peak observed for the energy about @xmath63 mev again demonstrates the small width of @xmath10 resonance and the large value of the matrix element .
the simple three - cluster model based on the phenomenological long - range potential with the pauli principle taken into account has allowed us to reveal a number of regularities both for the weakly - coupled ground state of @xmath1he and for the states of its continuous spectrum for the relatively low ( up to a few mev ) energies .
the large value of the rms radius in the ground state can be explained by the considerable diffuseness of the wave function caused by the slowly - decreasing effective potential .
the asymptotic region , where the wave function decreases exponentially begins only at the hyperradius values greater than 1520 fm .
the phase shift of elastic scattering ( @xmath64 ) is proportional to @xmath53 or @xmath18 at low energies which leads to the sharp maximum of the matrix element of the isoscalar transition from the ground state to the @xmath4-states of the continuous spectrum .
finally , our calculations predict a considerable enhancing of the probability of the radiative capture of two neutrons by the alpha - particle for the energy corresponding to the @xmath10-resonance of @xmath1he . | @xmath1he nucleus three - cluster system lowest threshold @xmath3 ) is three - particle one systems have remarkable properties determined by pauli principle potential energy dependence due to three - body structure pauli principle restrictions on wave function components antisymmetric nucleon permutation using expansion over harmonic - oscillator basis excluding states forbidden by pauli principle simplest wave function of @xmath4-state of @xmath1he lowest oscillator - basis function superposition of states with three - particle hypermomentum @xmath5 and @xmath7 function generates infinite set states differing by oscillator quanta same ratio of @xmath5 and @xmath7 components approximation using this functions called @xmath0-approximation other basis states contain components with @xmath9 weight small for @xmath10-states wave functions-approximation contain only @xmath7 components @xmath11-states superpositions of @xmath12 ( @xmath13 and @xmath14{\mbox\stackrel\scriptstyle components second characteristic systems slow decrease potential energy for large values hyperradius @xmath15 in three - body systems potential energy asymptotical behaviour @xmath16 @xmath17 even if two - body forces short - range leads to two results boundary system loose rms radius larger neighbouring nuclei three - particle threshold higher phase shift three - body scattering rises at low energies proportional to @xmath18 @xmath19 affects electromagnetic transitions matrix elements between ground state @xmath1he continuous spectrum aim present paper detailed quantitative analysis of regularities in @xmath1he structure simple model loosely - bound system with lowest three - particle thresholdbasis functions zero angular momentum @xmath20 n(l=0 ) = a_0(n)_n0 + a_2(n)_n2()u_2 superposition coefficients a_0(n ) = a_2(n ) = @xmath21 hyperspherical functions nk = n_n( normalized hyperradial harmonic - oscillator functions laguerre polynomials normalizing coefficients wave function @xmath25 state reduced to expansion ( l=0 ) contribution @xmath7 states greater @xmath5 states 0.86 < a_2 ^ 2(n ) < 0.96 ; a_0 2(n ) = 1 - a_2 ^ 2(n ) contribution @xmath5 states neglected expansion relations hold l=0 ) = n=0 c_n _ n2()u_2 = u_2 = ^5/2 u_2 ( function @xmath27 one - dimensional schrdinger equation + v()= e @xmath28 nucleon mass @xmath29 hypermomentum @xmath30 effective three - body potential equation starting point discussionsolved numerical integration @xmath15 zero to large cutoff radius @xmath31 effective potential modelled function v = v_0 correct asymptotics singularity @xmath32 states zero angular momentum chosen parameters @xmath33 @xmath34 experimental values @xmath1he binding energy rms radius @xmath35 mev fm values v_0 = -87 mev a = 3.073 fm calculated wave function @xmath1he ground state @xmath4-states wave function effective potential @xmath30 presented in fig . 1 horizontal line below @xmath15-axis ground state energy intersection potential energy curve turning point vertical line separates values less than fm wave function falls @xmath38 small @xmath15 strong kinematical barrier large long - range character potential @xmath30 slow decrease wave function significant diffuseness boundary nuclear system loosely - bound binary systems short - range potential approximated exponential function ( ) ( -r ) , = @xmath39 bound state energy @xmath40 radial variable binary channelcriterion validity zero - range is ratio potential range cluster radii to system radius @xmath41 binding energy compare wave function after solution eq . ( [ 5 ] ) with approximation eq [ 8 ] ) for @xmath42@xmath43 line fig . 1 nucleon system more loose than predicted by wave function 8 function @xmath27 at @xmath15 behaves as @xmath38 @xmath44 effective potential energy decreases slower than exponential formula potential short - range estimates of hyperradius mean value @xmath45 based on 8 three times less than experimental value for large @xmath15 function @xmath27 has asymptotics 10 @xmath46 macdonald function coefficient @xmath47 less than @xmath48 c 0.12 fm^-1/2 < 0.66 fm^-1/2 asymptotics denoted by short - dashed line in fig . 1 interest are solutions of eq . ( [ 5 ] ) for continuous spectrum for low over - threshold energiesattention to behaviour three - to - three scattering phase @xmath50 function energy in potential field asymptotical behaviour @xmath51 kinematic barrier @xmath52 @xmath7 estimates low energies phase shift proportional to @xmath53 @xmath18 ) = 3.95 fm low - energy values @xmath54 cutoff radius @xmath31 functions @xmath53 in fig . 2 @xmath31 large 1000 fm for energies below 10 kev value @xmath55 prediction ground - state energy @xmath1he = 1.3 mev 0.97 mev three - body phase shift @xmath50 @xmath31 functions of energy @xmath56 up to 5 mev in fig . calculations medium - energy region @xmath31 50 fm lowest energies increased phase shift rises from zero to @xmath58 for @xmath59 goes down phase shift near @xmath58 maximum wave function moves closer to zero matrix element isoscalar transition spectrum increases fig 4 maximal for @xmath60 mev electrodisintegration cross - section @xmath1he@xmath0-approximation pauli principle @xmath10-states @xmath1he contain hyperspherical function @xmath7 obtain wave functions @xmath27-states equation ( 5 ) with @xmath7 other parameters potential @xmath30 @xmath1he nucleus no @xmath10 bound state @xmath10-resonance energy 0.822@xmath610.025 mev width 0.113@xmath610.020 mev energy width resonance reproduced parameters potential v_0 = -92 mev a = 2.834 fm wave function @xmath27 resonance state potential energy parameters presented in fig . 5 small @xmath15 resonance wave function ground state larger @xmath15 oscillates scattering phase shift @xmath10-state equation new potential parameters presented fig . 6 energy 1 mev phase shift typical behaviour resonance region calculated matrix element operator isoscalar @xmath62 transition from ground state to @xmath10-states dependence upon energy presented in fig . narrow peak energy @xmath63 mev demonstrates small width @xmath10 resonance large value matrix elementthree - cluster model long - range potential pauli principle regularities weakly - coupled ground state @xmath1he states continuous spectrum low energies large value rms radius ground state diffuseness wave function decreasing effective potential asymptotic region wave function decreases begins at hyperradius values than 1520 fm phase shift elastic scattering @xmath64 proportional to @xmath53 @xmath18 at low energies maximum matrix element isoscalar transition from ground to @xmath4-states continuous spectrum calculations predict probability radiative capture of two neutrons by alpha - particle energy @xmath10-resonance of @xmath1he | 0.51306 | 3,032 | 1,573 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,250 | we build upon previous work on the densities of uniform random walks in higher dimensions , exploring some properties of the even moments of these densities and extending a result about their modularity . . | consider a short random walk of @xmath0 steps in @xmath1 dimensions where each step is of unit length and whose direction is chosen uniformly .
following @xcite , we let @xmath2 and denote by @xmath3 the probability density function of the distance @xmath4 to the origin of this random walk . this paper will be concerned with the even moments of these random walks .
define @xmath5 as the @xmath6 moment of the probability density function .
we know that for non - negative integers @xmath7 , @xmath8 is given by @xmath9 for given @xmath10 , let @xmath11 be the infinite lower triangular matrix with entries @xmath12 for row indices @xmath13 and columns entries @xmath14
. then the moments @xmath15 are given by the row sums of @xmath16 .
for a good history of these moments , and random walks in general , see @xcite . for example , the upper corner of @xmath17 and @xmath18 are given below .
@xmath19\ ] ] @xmath20\ ] ] @xmath21\ ] ] the lower triangular entries of @xmath22 are the squares of the binomial coefficients @xmath23 and those in @xmath24 are known as the naryana numbers ( * ? ? ?
* a001263 ) . using these observations about @xmath22 and @xmath24
, it is easy to observe that all of the coefficients of @xmath22 and @xmath24 are integers .
a quick glance at @xmath18 shows that this is not always true .
it was stated that @xmath25 in @xcite .
we define @xmath26 using this notation we see that @xmath27 and @xmath28 . it is not immediately that @xmath29 is well defined and finite for all @xmath10 , ( although we will show that this is the case ) . in section [ sec : a z ] we show that [ thm : main ] for @xmath30 we have @xmath31 .
this is not best possible . in section [ sec : backwards ] we prove the opposite direction [ thm : backwards ] for @xmath30 we have @xmath32 .
we conjecture that this is in fact best possible .
that is , we conjecture [ conj : main ] for @xmath30 we have @xmath33 .
we present evidence for this conjecture in section [ sec : small ] and [ sec : evidence ] .
next we consider a result by borwein , nuyens , straub and wan in @xcite about the modularity of moments .
they showed that for primes @xmath34 , we have @xmath35 we extend this in section [ sec : mod ] to get [ thm : mod ] let * @xmath36 be prime with @xmath37 , or * @xmath38 be prime with @xmath39 . then @xmath40
if @xmath41 with @xmath34 prime then @xmath42 it is worth remarking that if both @xmath43 and @xmath44 are prime with @xmath45 ( and hence @xmath46 ) , then clearly @xmath47 by the chinese remainder theorem . in section [ sec : conc ]
we discuss some of the open problems related to this research .
to prove theorem [ thm : main ] , we make use of the following remark and lemma : there are multiple equivalent ways of representing @xmath49 .
the three most common that we will use are : @xmath50 [ lem : gcd ] for integers @xmath51 we have @xmath52 let @xmath53 and @xmath54 .
let @xmath55 and @xmath56 be the products of these sequences .
let @xmath34 be a prime number and @xmath57 be the @xmath34-adic valuation of @xmath4 .
we see that for @xmath58 that there is at most one term in @xmath59 that is divisible by @xmath60 . without loss of generality
we may assume that such a term , if it exists , is in @xmath61 .
we see that @xmath62 for all @xmath7 by translation .
further , if there exists a term in @xmath63 that is divisible by @xmath60 , then , by translations we can assume that this term is divisible by an arbitrarily high power of @xmath34 .
hence we can assume that , if such a term exists , then we can find a translate of this sequence so that @xmath64 we see that if @xmath65 then there are at most @xmath66 terms in @xmath67 are are divisible by @xmath68 .
we see that if @xmath69 then there are at most @xmath70 terms in @xmath67 are are divisible by @xmath68 . by chinese remainder theorem
we can find such a @xmath71 so that both the inequalities are exact .
this gives us that @xmath72 and moreover there exists a @xmath71 so that this is exact .
we observe that @xmath73 observe that if @xmath74 then @xmath75 if @xmath76 then @xmath77
if @xmath78 then @xmath79 lastly if @xmath80 then @xmath81 hence @xmath82 which gives that @xmath83 as required .
it is worth remarking that for any fixed @xmath84 , we can find tighter lower bounds for the @xmath85 by using directly .
this can be used to tighten the results of theorem [ thm : main ] for specific @xmath10 .
unfortunately even when tightened in this way , we can not achieve the conjectured bound .
see table [ tab : compare ] .prime factorization of eq and @xmath86 . [
cols="<,<,<",options="header " , ]
we have computationally checked that for all @xmath87 that conjecture [ conj : main ] holds , further , using the techniques of theorems [ thm : nu=3 ] and [ thm : nu=4 ] we have computationally verified that for all @xmath88 and all @xmath7 that conjecture [ conj : main ] holds .
it is not unreasonable to think that conjecture [ conj : main ] can hold in general . indeed ,
if we plot the non - integer entries in the lower triangular part of @xmath11 and colour them based on the prime factorization of their denominators in reduced form we obtain the fractal pattern seen in figure ( [ frac_fig ] ) .
this suggests that there is far more structure to the matrix @xmath11 that we are currently exploiting .
we note that from equation @xmath89 combined with theorem [ thm : main ] we would be able to prove that @xmath90 .
we conjecture that @xmath91 . in this image of @xmath92 , denominators are coloured red for 2 , blue for 3 , green for 7 and orange for @xmath93 . if the denominator had contained any additional factors of @xmath94 , @xmath95 or @xmath96 then we would have coloured this value black .
none occurred . assuming that primes always give rise to the associated fractals early on , as seen in figure [ frac_fig ] , we would be led to believe that @xmath97 . ]
we rewrite ( [ moment_def ] ) as @xmath99 let @xmath36 be prime with @xmath37 or let @xmath38 be prime with @xmath39 .
we claim that there does not exist indices @xmath100 such that @xmath101 and @xmath102 .
indeed , this would lead to @xmath103 if @xmath36 then @xmath37 by assumption and hence @xmath104 , a contradiction .
if @xmath105 then @xmath39 by assumption and hence @xmath106 , a contradiction .
if instead @xmath107 and @xmath108 it is easy to see that there does not exist indices @xmath100 such that @xmath109 and @xmath110 .
we consider 2 cases : if there exists @xmath111 such that @xmath112 then clearly @xmath113 for @xmath114 and hence @xmath115 assume that @xmath116 for all @xmath111 . if @xmath36 we see that @xmath117 and @xmath118 .
we further see that at most one term in the denominator is divisible by @xmath34 .
hence @xmath119 can be written as @xmath120 where @xmath121 , and thus is equivalent to @xmath122 mod @xmath34 . if @xmath105 we see that @xmath118 .
we further see that no term in the denominator is divisible by @xmath34 .
hence @xmath119 can be written as @xmath120 where @xmath121 , and thus is equivalent to @xmath122 mod @xmath34 . if @xmath41 and @xmath108 we see that @xmath123 and @xmath124 .
we further see that we have at most @xmath125 factors of @xmath34 in the denominator , with equality only if @xmath126 for all @xmath127 .
hence @xmath119 can be written as @xmath128 where @xmath121 , and thus is equivalent to @xmath122 mod @xmath129 .
thus there are only @xmath0 terms in the sum for @xmath8 which are not @xmath130 ( resp @xmath131 ) , namely when @xmath112 for some @xmath7 . in this case
the term is @xmath132 ( resp @xmath133 ) hence @xmath134
we showed in section [ sec : small ] that conjecture [ conj : main ] held for the case @xmath135 and @xmath136 .
it is probably that this technique could be extended computationally for any fixed @xmath10 , although this is not clear .
it is not clear that this technique would be extendable to arbitrary @xmath10 without additional ideas . in section [ sec : mod ]
we showed how the ideas of modularity of @xmath137 could be extended to @xmath107 or @xmath138 .
it appears that something is also happening in the case when @xmath139 and @xmath140 , although it is unclear how one would prove this .
there are most likely many other relations that can be found when considering @xmath141 modulo a well chosen prime power .
the authors would like to thank jon borwein for many useful discussions and suggestions , without which this paper would not have been possible . | short random walk @xmath0 steps @xmath1 dimensions each step unit length direction chosen uniformly following @xcite @xmath2 denote @xmath3 probability density function distance @xmath4 to origin random walk paper even moments walks define @xmath5 as @xmath6 moment probability density function non - negative integers @xmath7 @xmath8 given by @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 infinite lower triangular matrix entries @xmath12 row indices @xmath13 columns entries @xmath14 moments @xmath15 given by row sums @xmath16 history moments random walks see @xcite upper corner of @xmath17 @xmath18 given below @xmath19 @xmath21 lower triangular entries @xmath22 squares of binomial coefficients @xmath23 @xmath24 naryana numbers a001263 coefficients of @xmath22 @xmath24 are integers @xmath18 not always true @xmath25 @xcite define @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 not @xmath29 well defined finite for all @xmath10 section [ sec : z ] for @xmath30 @xmath31 .not best possible section sec backwards prove opposite direction @xmath30 have @xmath32 conjecture best possible for @xmath30 have @xmath33 present evidence section [ sec : small ] evidence ] consider result by borwein nuyens straub wan @xcite modularity of moments showed primes @xmath34 have @xmath35 extend section sec : mod ] @xmath36 prime with @xmath37 @xmath38 prime with @xmath39 @xmath40 if @xmath41 with @xmath34 prime then @xmath42 if @xmath43 @xmath44 prime with @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 by chinese remainder theorem section sec : conc ] discuss open problems research prove theorem remark multiple equivalent ways representing @xmath49 three common @xmath50 integers @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 products of sequences @xmath34 prime number @xmath57 @xmath34-adic valuation of @xmath4 @xmath58 one term in @xmath59 divisible by @xmath60 assume term in @xmath61 @xmath62 for all @xmath7 by translation if term in @xmath63 divisible by @xmath60 assume term divisible by high power @xmath34 if term exists find translate sequence @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 terms in @xmath67 divisible by @xmath68 if @xmath69 @xmath70 terms in @xmath67 divisible by @xmath68 chinese remainder theorem find @xmath71 inequalities exact gives @xmath72 @xmath71 exact observe @xmath73 if @xmath74 then @xmath75 @xmath76 then @xmath77 @xmath78 then @xmath79 @xmath80 then @xmath81 @xmath82 gives @xmath83 as required fixed @xmath84 find tighter lower bounds for @xmath85 tighten results of theorem [ thm : main ] for @xmath10 achieve conjectured bound see table [ compare ].prime factorization of eq and @xmath86 computationally checked for all @xmath87 conjecture [ conj : main ] holds nu=3 nu=4 verified for all @xmath88 and @xmath7 conjecture [ conj : main ] holdsnot unreasonable conjecture [ : main ] hold plot non - integer entries lower triangular @xmath11 colour prime factorization denominators obtain fractal pattern figure suggests more structure to matrix @xmath11 equation @xmath89 theorem [ thm main ] prove @xmath90 conjecture @xmath91 image @xmath92 denominators coloured red 2 blue 3 green 7 orange @xmath93 if denominator additional factors @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath96 coloured value black none occurred assuming primes give rise to fractals early believe @xmath97 rewrite moment_def as @xmath99 let @xmath36 prime with @xmath37 @xmath38 prime with @xmath39 claim indices @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 lead to @xmath103 if @xmath36 @xmath37 assumption @xmath104 contradiction @xmath105 @xmath39 assumption @xmath106 contradiction if @xmath107 and @xmath108 indices @xmath100 @xmath109 @xmath110 consider 2 cases if exists @xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath113 for @xmath114 @xmath115 assume @xmath116 for @xmath111@xmath36 @xmath117 @xmath118 one term divisible by @xmath34 @xmath119 @xmath120 where @xmath121 equivalent to @xmath122 mod @xmath34 @xmath105 @xmath118 no term divisible by @xmath34 @xmath119 @xmath120 where @xmath121 equivalent to @xmath122 mod @xmath34 @xmath41 @xmath108 @xmath123 @xmath124 @xmath125 factors of @xmath34 in denominator equality if @xmath126 for @xmath127 @xmath119 written as @xmath128 where @xmath121 equivalent to @xmath122 mod @xmath129 @xmath0 terms sum for @xmath8 not @xmath130 resp @xmath131 ) @xmath112 @xmath7 term is @xmath132 ( resp @xmath133 ) @xmath134 conjecture for @xmath135 and @xmath136 technique extended computationally for fixed @xmath10 not clear technique extendable to arbitrary @xmath10 without additional ideas section sec : ] ideas of modularity of @xmath137 extended to @xmath107 or @xmath138 something @xmath139 and @xmath140 unclear other relations considering @xmath141 modulo prime powerauthors thank jon borwein for useful discussions suggestions without paper possible | 0.351264 | 2,340 | 1,295 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,251 | we give a quantum field theoretical treatment of a one dimensional electron system with a fixed chemical potential @xmath0 .
the non - perturbative lindhard response function is found for an electron system in a sinusoidal potential . | our goal is to treat relativistically the response of an electron system to a periodic electric field in the framework of 1 + 1 dimensional qed ( qed@xmath1 ) .
we assume the presence of a classical periodic electric mean field , i.e. the electromagnetic field variable @xmath2 is the sum of this classical field and the quantum fluctuations .
the interaction of the fermions with this classical field is treated exactly , whereas the quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field are taken into account at 1-loop order . requiring that the classical field is a mean field enables us to investigate a wigner crystal ( wigner 1934 , grimes 1979 ) relativistically . to get a better understanding of such an electron system , it is unavoidable to investigate its non - perturbative response to a classical periodic electric field , that is the issue of the present work .
the classical periodic electric field is chosen in the form : @xmath3 with amplitude @xmath4 and wavenumber @xmath5 .
the homogeneous term @xmath0 corresponds to the chemical potential of the system .
in qed the expectation value of the gauge field vanishes . to take into account a mean field self - consistently in this theory we should modify its generating functional .
our method is based on defining a sector of qed for field configurations belonging to quantum fluctuations around a given vacuum expectation value @xmath6 .
we multipy the integrand of the common generating functional of qed@xmath1 by the factor 1 written in the form @xmath7 where @xmath8 is a vector in the space of the vector potential configurations and with @xmath9 the spacetime volume .
then , we find @xmath10 where the functional @xmath11 is the generating functional of the sector belonging to vector potential configurations in a hypersurface orthogonal to @xmath8 .
@xmath12 is the electromagnetic and @xmath13 is the dirac field , @xmath14 and @xmath15 are the action of the electromagnetic field and the dirac action , resp . , and @xmath16 is the gauge fixing parameter . by shifting the integration variable according to @xmath17 ,
the projected generating functional becomes @xmath18 self - consistency requires that @xmath19 this condition fixes the value of @xmath20 . to fulfill the requirement of ( [ constraint ] ) an extra renormalization condition
is needed to every single loop correction . in our treatment
the form of @xmath21 coincides with ( [ meanfield ] ) .
calculations of any physical quantity is performed by taking an expectation value of that quantity with the modified generating functional . to determine the lindhard function we should calculate the polarization @xmath22
the form of which in qed is : @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the electron propagator .
diagrammatically @xmath22 corresponds to the diagram in fig . 1 .
( without the external legs ) . in fig .
1 . the solid lines represent the electron propagator and the wavy lines correspond to the photon propagator .
since we are interested first in the response of the electron system to an arbitrary periodic potential , @xmath4 and @xmath5 should be considered as free parameters in the lindhard function .
the electron propagator belonging to the projected generating functional contains all the effects of the periodic classical field and the propagator itself looses its translational symmetry due to this sinusoidal vector potential .
another consequence of the periodic classical field is that the electron propagator from ( [ zqedp ] ) does not have analytic form , the linhard response function can only be obtained numerically .
first , we write down @xmath25 in momentum space according to : @xmath26 in momentum space the two - vector @xmath27 is the momentum of the photon in fig .
1 . coming from the left , while @xmath28 denotes the momentum of the outgoing photon . performing the integrations in ( [ pikkp ] )
we get : @xmath29 where @xmath30 and @xmath31 are positive energy eigenvalues corresponding to the positive and negative frequency eigenspinors of the dirac hamiltonian @xmath32 $ ] with the potential ( [ meanfield ] ) , and @xmath33 contains products of the eigenspinors of @xmath32 $ ] in the following form : @xmath34 @xmath35 and @xmath36 are parts of the bloch type eigenspinors ( nagy 2000 ) .
the first dirac delta in ( [ pi ] ) expresses the breaking of the translational symmetry due to the periodic field .
we expect that ( [ pi ] ) at close to @xmath37 has a maximum value for @xmath38 when the fermi surface is positioned close to the boundary of the brillouin zone .
it would mean that there is no energy exchange between the two electrons in fig . 1 .
but they exchange momentum @xmath39 .
it reminds us to the so called peierls phase transition where near the fermi surface electrons can jump from one side of the fermi surface to the other without any energy cost .
the instability caused by this procedure is stabilized by a gap in the dispersion relation arising at the edge of the fermi surface . in our treatment
the stability is ensured by the periodic electric mean field which produces a gap at the edge of the brillouin zone .
the authors would like to thank j. polonyi and g. plunien for the useful discussions .
this work was supported by the projects otka t023844/97 , daad - mb 27/1999 and nato sa ( pst.clg 975722)5066 .
numerical computations are in progress on the computer cluster donated by the alexander von humboldt foundation .
grimes , c. c. and adams , g. , phys .
rev . lett . * 42 * , 795 ( 1979 ) + nagy , s. , sailer , k. , heavy ion phys . * 11 * , nos 1 - 2 , 67 ( 2000 ) + wigner , e. p. , phys . rev . *
46 * , 1002 ( 1934 )
fig . 1 . : diagram of @xmath40 . | goal treat relativistically response electron system to periodic electric field 1 + 1 dimensional qed@xmath1 assume classical periodic electric mean field electromagnetic field variable @xmath2 sum classical field quantum fluctuations interaction fermions with classical field treated quantum fluctuations 1-loop order classical field mean field investigate wigner crystal relativistically electron system investigate non - perturbative response to classical periodic electric field issue present work classical periodic electric field chosen form @xmath3 amplitude @xmath4 wavenumber @xmath5 homogeneous term @xmath0 chemical potential system in qed expectation value gauge field vanishes mean field modify generating functional method defining sector qed for field configurations quantum fluctuations around vacuum expectation value @xmath6 multipy generating functional qed@xmath1 by factor 1 form @xmath7 @xmath8 vector space potential @xmath9 spacetime volume find @xmath10 functional @xmath11 generating functional sector vector potential configurations hypersurface orthogonal @xmath8 @xmath12 electromagnetic @xmath13 dirac field @xmath14 @xmath15 action of electromagnetic field dirac action@xmath16 gauge fixing parameter shifting integration variable to @xmath17 projected generating functional becomes @xmath18 consistency requires @xmath19 fixes value @xmath20 extra renormalization condition needed loop correction form @xmath21 coincides with meanfield ] calculations physical quantity expectation value with modified generating functional determine lindhard function calculate polarization @xmath22 form qed @xmath23 @xmath24 electron propagator @xmath22 corresponds to diagram fig . 1 . solid lines represent electron propagator wavy lines photon propagator response electron system to arbitrary periodic potential @xmath4 and @xmath5 free parameters in lindhard function electron propagator generating functional contains effects periodic classical field looses translational symmetry due to sinusoidal vector potential electron propagator from zqedp analytic form linhard response function obtained numerically write down @xmath25 in momentum space according to @xmath26 vector @xmath27 is momentum of photon in fig . @xmath28 momentum outgoing photonintegrations in pikkp @xmath29 positive energy eigenvalues positive negative frequency eigenspinors dirac hamiltonian @xmath32 $ potential meanfield @xmath33 products eigenspinors @xmath32 @xmath34 bloch type eigenspinors 2000 ) first dirac delta pi ] breaking translational symmetry periodic field [ pi ] ) close @xmath37 maximum value for @xmath38 surface brillouin zone no energy exchange between electrons exchange momentum @xmath39 peierls phase transition electrons jump energy cost instability stabilized by gap dispersion relation edge fermi surface stability ensured by periodic electric mean field gap at edge brillouin zone authors thank j. polonyi g. plunien discussions supported by projects otka t023844/97 daad - mb 27/1999 nato sa ( 975722)5066 numerical computations on computer cluster alexander von humboldt foundation grimes , c.. adams , g. phys . rev . lett * 42 * , 795 ( 1979 ) nagy , s. sailer heavy ion phys . 11 nos 1 - 2 , 67 ( 2000 ) wigner , e..phys rev 46 1002 1934 fig 1 diagram @xmath40 | 0.260009 | 1,338 | 701 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,254 | though lep ii direct searches still can not exclude a chargino nearly degenerate with the lightest neutralino if their mass is only slightly above half of the @xmath0 boson mass , it can be excluded indirectly analyzing precision data . in this particular
limit simple analytical formulas for oblique electroweak radiative corrections are presented .
infn - fe-11 - 99 + hep - ph/9907219 @xmath1 dipartimento di fisica , universit di ferrara , i-44100 , ferrara , italy + @xmath2 istituto tesre / cnr , via gobetti 101 , i-40129 bologna , italy + @xmath3 infn , sezione di ferrara , i-44100 , ferrara , italy + @xmath4 itep , moscow , russia | lep ii is very effective in bounding from below masses of charginos which , if this is kinematically allowed , should be produced in a pair in @xmath5 annihilation .
the present bounds are @xmath6 for the higgsino - dominated case and @xmath7 for the gaugino - dominated case if sneutrino is not too heavy @xcite . however ,
when the lightest chargino and neutralino ( the latter being the lsp ) are almost degenerate in mass , the charged decay products of the light chargino are very soft , and the above quoted bounds are no longer valid .
special search for such light charginos has been performed recently by delphi collaboration , and the case of @xmath8 is now excluded @xcite .
however , still in the case of @xmath9 lep ii does not provide a lower bound and charginos as light as @xmath10 are allowed ( this bound comes from the measurements of @xmath0 decays at lep i and slc ) .
the case of almost degenerate chargino and neutralino can be naturally realized in susy and the possibilities to find such particles are discussed in literature @xcite . in this letter
we investigate the radiative corrections to @xmath11 and to @xmath0 boson decay parameters generated by such almost degenerate particles .
when their masses are close to @xmath12 radiative corrections are large and they spoil the perfect description of experimental data by the standard model . due to the decoupling property of susy models ,
when @xmath13 the radiative corrections are power suppressed .
in the simplest supersymmetric extensions of the standard model the chargino - neutralino sector is defined by the numerical values of four parameters : @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 .
the case of nearly degenerate lightest chargino and neutralino naturally arise when : 1 .
[ case_a ] @xmath18 : in this case the particles of interest form an @xmath19 doublet of dirac fermions , whose wave functions are dominated by higgsinos ; 2 .
[ case_b ] @xmath20 : in this way we get an @xmath19 triplet of majorana fermions , with the wave functions dominated by winos . in this way
we get higgsino- and gaugino - dominated scenarios , correspondingly .
let us start from case ( [ case_a ] ) .
the degenerate dirac doublet produces the following corrections to the three functions @xmath21 which determine the values of radiative corrections ( for definitions of functions @xmath21 and further details about electroweak radiative corrections see @xcite ) : @xmath22 , \\
\delta^{\tilde h } v_a & = \frac{16}{9 } { \left } ( \frac{1}{2 } - s^2 + s^4 { \right } ) { \left } [ \frac{12 \chi^2 f(\chi ) - 2\chi - 1}{4\chi - 1 } { \right } ] , \\
\delta^{\tilde h } v_r & = \frac{16}{9 } c^2 s^2 { \left } [ { \left } ( 1 + 2\chi { \right } ) f(\chi ) - \frac{1}{3 } { \right}],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath23 , the function @xmath24 is defined in appendix b of ref .
@xcite , and @xmath25 ( @xmath26 ) is the sine ( cosine ) squared of the electroweak mixing angle @xmath27 . comparing the experimental data with standard model formulas @xcite , we obtain that the @xmath28 for the new physics contributions to @xmath21 can be computed in the following way : @xmath29 \label{eq40b } \begin{pmatrix } c_{mm } & c_{ma } & c_{mr } \\ c_{ma } & c_{aa } & c_{ar } \\
c_{mr } & c_{ar } & c_{rr } \end{pmatrix } = \begin{pmatrix } 7.28 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 7.24 & 2.54 \\ 0 & 2.54 & 23.03 \end{pmatrix } ; \qquad \begin{pmatrix } \overline{\delta v_m } \\
\overline{\delta v_a } \\
\overline{\delta v_r } \end{pmatrix } = \begin{pmatrix } -0.07 \\ -0.33 \\
+ 0.01 \end{pmatrix}.\end{gathered}\ ] ] in fig .
[ fig10 ] the functions @xmath30 are plotted against the chargino - neutralino mass @xmath31 . comparing this graph with formulas and
, we see that at @xmath32 c.l .
the bound @xmath33 should be satisfied .
note that the main contribution to @xmath28 comes from @xmath34 , which is singular at @xmath35 .
this singularity is not physical and our formulas are valid only for @xmath36 ; the existence of @xmath37 with a mass closer to @xmath12 will change z - boson breit - wigner curve , therefore it is also not allowed .
the importance of the @xmath0 wave function renormalization for the case of light charginos was emphasized in @xcite .
functions ( left y - axis ) and of the confidence level ( right y - axis ) on the light gaugino mass @xmath31 , in the limit @xmath18 ( higgsino - dominated case ) . ] for case ( [ case_b ] ) ( gaugino dominated states ) the expressions for the @xmath38 functions are : @xmath39 , \\ \delta^{\tilde w } v_a & = \frac{16}{9 } c^4 { \left } [ \frac{12 \chi^2 f(\chi ) - 2\chi - 1}{4\chi - 1 } { \right } ] ,
\\ \delta^{\tilde w } v_r & = \frac{16}{9 } c^2 s^2 { \left } [ { \left } ( 1 + 2\chi { \right } ) f(\chi ) - \frac{1}{3 } { \right}].\end{aligned}\ ] ] the values of these functions are shown in fig .
[ fig20 ] and at 95% c.l .
we get @xmath40 .
let us remark that , although this and the previous bounds have been obtained respectively in the limits @xmath41 and @xmath42 ( in which case the mass splitting @xmath43 is exactly zero ) , we have verified numerically using equations from ref . @xcite that they are still valid for values of @xmath44 and @xmath45 small enough to allow for @xmath9 .
functions ( left y - axis ) and of the confidence level ( right y - axis ) on the light gaugino mass @xmath31 , in the limit @xmath20 ( wino - dominated case ) . ]
since there are a number of new additional particles in susy extensions , we will briefly discuss their contributions to the functions @xmath21 . in the considered limits the remaining charginos and neutralinos are very heavy , so they simply decouple and produce negligible contributions .
the contributions of the three generations of sleptons ( with masses larger than @xmath46 ) into @xmath47 are smaller than @xmath48 , so they can be safely neglected .
the contributions of squarks of the first two generations are also negligible since they should be heavier than tevatron direct search bounds ; taking @xmath49 , we have @xmath50 .
concerning the contributions of the third generation squarks , they are enhanced by the large top - bottom mass difference and are not negligible . however , being positive and almost universal @xcite , they do not affect our analysis : compensating negative contributions of chargino - neutralino into @xmath47 they will generate positive contributions to @xmath51 and @xmath52 , and @xmath28 will not be better .
when squarks are heavy enough ( for @xmath53 ) , they simply decouple and their contributions become negligible as well .
the last sector of the theory to be discussed is higgs bosons . unlike the case of standard model
now we have one extra charged higgs and two extra neutral higgses .
their contributions to radiative corrections were studied in detail in @xcite . according to fig . 2 from that paper it is clear that the contributions of mssm higgses ( and @xmath54 gauge bosons ) equal with very good accuracy those of the standard model with the mass of sm higgs being equal to that of the lightest neutral higgs in susy generalization .
that is why the contributions from the gauge - higgs sector of the theory also can not compensate those of the light chargino - neutralino .
apart from oblique corrections ( those arising from vector bosons self energies ) which have been considered in this letter , there are process dependent vertex and box corrections .
however , due to lep ii and tevatron low bounds on squarks and sleptons masses they are small .
we are grateful to f. l. villante for useful discussion on @xmath28 analysis and to p. h. chankowski for bringing ref .
@xcite to our attention .
investigation of m. v. are supported by the grants of rfbr no .
98 - 07 - 90076 and 98 - 02 - 17372 . | lep ii effective bounding below masses charginos if allowed should produced pair in @xmath5 annihilation present bounds are @xmath6 higgsino - @xmath7 gaugino - if sneutrino not heavy lightest chargino neutralino almost degenerate charged decay products soft bounds no longer valid search for light charginos performed by delphi collaboration case @xmath8 excluded @xcite @xmath9 lep ii provide lower bound charginos light as @xmath10 allowed bound from measurements @xmath0 decays at lep i slc almost degenerate chargino neutralino realized in susy possibilities find particles discussed in literature investigate radiative corrections to @xmath11 @xmath0 boson decay parameters almost degenerate particles masses close to @xmath12 radiative corrections large spoil description experimental data decoupling when @xmath13 radiative corrections suppressed standard model chargino - neutralino sector defined by values four parameters @xmath14 nearly degenerate lightest chargino neutralino arise when : 1 .case_a ] @xmath18 particles form @xmath19 doublet of dirac fermions wave functions dominated by higgsinos case_b ] @xmath20 @xmath19 triplet of majorana fermions wave functions dominated by winos higgsino- gaugino - dominated scenarios start from case degenerate dirac doublet produces corrections to functions @xmath21 values radiative corrections definitions functions corrections see @xcite @xmath22 \delta^{\tilde h } \frac{16}{9 }{1}{2 } - s^2 + s^4\frac{12 ( - 2\chi - 1}{4\chi - 1\delta{\tilde \frac{16}{9 } c^2 s^2\left 2(\chi - \frac{1}{3 } @xmath23 function @xmath24 defined in appendix b @xcite @xmath25 @xmath26 ) sine squared of electroweak mixing angle @xmath27 experimental data with model formulas @xcite @xmath28 new physics contributions to @xmath21 computed @xmath29{eq40b\begin{pmatrix c_{mm c_{ma c_{mr{pmatrix\begin{pmatrix 7.28 & 0 7.24 & 2.54 2.54 23.03{pmatrix{pmatrix{\delta v_m } v_a v_r }{pmatrix\begin{pmatrix } -0.07 \\ -0.33 \\ + 0.01{pmatrix fig functions @xmath30 plotted against chargino - neutralino mass @xmath31 graph with formulas at @xmath32 bound @xmath33 satisfied main contribution to @xmath28 from @xmath34 singular at @xmath35 singularity not physical formulas valid for @xmath36 @xmath37 with mass closer to @xmath12 z - boson breit - wigner curve not allowed importance of @xmath0 wave function renormalization light charginos emphasized in @xcitefunctions left y axis confidence level right y - axis light gaugino mass @xmath31 limit @xmath18 higgsino - dominated case case_b gaugino dominated states expressions @xmath38 functions @xmath39 \delta^{\tilde w \frac{16}{9 } c^4\left{12 \chi^2 f(\chi ) - 2\chi - 1}{4\chi - 1\right\frac{16}{9 } c^2 s^2 \left } 1 + 2\chi f(\chi ) - \frac{1}{3 } values functions shown in fig . fig20 95% c.l @xmath40 previous bounds obtained limits @xmath41 @xmath42 mass splitting @xmath43 zero verified numerically equations valid for values @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath9 functions left y - axis confidence level right y - axis light gaugino mass @xmath31 limit @xmath20 wino - dominated case new additional particles susy extensions discuss contributions functions @xmath21 limits remaining charginos neutralinos heavy decouple produce negligible contributionscontributions three generations sleptons larger @xmath46 into @xmath47 smaller than @xmath48 neglected contributions squarks first two generations negligible heavier than tevatron direct search bounds @xmath49 @xmath50 contributions third generation squarks enhanced by large top - bottom mass difference not negligible positive almost universal affect analysis compensating negative contributions chargino - neutralino @xmath47 generate positive contributions to @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath28 not better squarks heavy enough for @xmath53 decouple contributions negligible last sector higgs bosons one extra charged higgs two neutral higgses contributions to radiative corrections studied in @xcite fig . 2 contributions of mssm higgses @xmath54 gauge bosons equal standard model mass sm higgs equal to lightest neutral higgs contributions from gauge - higgs sector compensate light chargino - neutralino oblique corrections process dependent vertex box corrections due to lep ii tevatron low bounds on squarks sleptons masses small grateful to f. l. villante for discussion @xmath28 analysis p. h. chankowski for @xcitesupported grants 98 - 07 - 90076 02 - 17372 | 0.345913 | 2,182 | 1,151 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,255 | the effect of new operators that only modify the bosonic couplings of the higgs boson , without altering the @xmath0 or @xmath1 three point functions , are examined in the @xmath2 and @xmath3 processes .
we analyse the constraints on these interactions that can be imposed by the lep ii collider at cern and at the next linear collider . | the experiments which are taking place at the cern lep ii electron positron collider will be able to explore the gauge structure of @xmath0 and @xmath1 three point functions in the @xmath4pair production @xcite . deviations from the standard model ( sm ) predictions for this reaction would indicate the existence of new physics effects .
in general , such deviations can be parametrized in terms of effective lagrangians by adding to the sm lagrangian , high dimension operators that describe the new phenomena @xcite . this model
independent approach accounts for new physics that shows up at an energy scale @xmath5 , larger than the electroweak scale .
the effective lagrangians are constructed with the light particle spectrum that exists at low energies , while the heavy degrees of freedom are integrated out .
they are invariant under the @xmath6 and , in the linearly realized version , they involve , in addition to the usual gauge boson fields , also the light higgs particle .
the most general dimension6 effective lagrangian , containing all sm bosonic fields , that is @xmath7 and @xmath8 even , was constructed in ref .
@xcite . in this letter
, we explore the consequence of new operators that give rise to anomalous higgs boson couplings , without affecting the self interaction amongst the gauge bosons .
these anomalous interactions can _ not _ be constraint by the lep ii results on w pair production .
in particular , we study the reactions @xmath9 and @xmath3 .
these processes do not involve any triple vector boson coupling , but only @xmath10 and @xmath11 anomalous higgs interactions . in the sm , neglecting the higgs electron coupling , there are no higgs contributions to these reactions at tree level since the @xmath10 and @xmath11 couplings are generated only at one
loop @xcite . out of the eleven independent operators constructed in ref.@xcite ,
two of them describe new interactions between the higgs particle and the vector bosons , @xmath12 where , in the unitary gauge , the higgs doublet becomes @xmath13^t$ ] , and @xmath14 , and @xmath15 , with @xmath16 and @xmath17 being the field strength tensors of the @xmath18 and @xmath19 gauge fields respectively .
we should notice that the operators ( [ lagrangian ] ) contribute only to the anomalous higgs couplings , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , since their possible contribution to the self
boson couplings , @xmath0 and @xmath1 , can be completely absorbed in the redefinition of the sm fields and gauge couplings @xcite .
furthermore , no new @xmath22 or @xmath3 vertices , like the ones studied in ref .
@xcite , are generated via these operators .
therefore , studies of anomalous trilinear gauge boson couplings are insensitive to the coefficients @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
anomalous higgs boson couplings have already been studied in higgs and z boson decays @xcite , in @xmath25 @xcite , @xmath26 @xcite , and @xmath27 colliders @xcite . here , in order to impose limits on the dimension6 operators ( [ lagrangian ] ) that generate the new higgs interactions , we examine the total @xmath22 and @xmath3 yield and kinematical distributions of the final state particles at lep ii and at the next linear collider , nlc .
in our analysis of the @xmath28 and @xmath29 reactions , we have taken into account the standard one loop higgs contributions @xcite to these processes . in this way
, the @xmath3 production involves seven ( eight ) standard ( anomalous ) feynman contributions , while in the @xmath22 process there are ten ( twelve ) standard ( anomalous ) diagrams . in order to compute these contributions ,
we have incorporated all anomalous couplings in helas
type @xcite fortran subroutines .
these new subroutines were used to adapt a madgraph @xcite output to include all the anomalous contributions .
we have checked that our code passed the non trivial test of electromagnetic gauge invariance .
we investigate the @xmath3 and @xmath22 production both at lep ii and at nlc , assuming a center of mass energy of @xmath30 and 500 gev and an integrated luminosity of @xmath31 and 50 fb@xmath32 respectively .
we required that the photon energy , @xmath33 , is larger than 5 gev for lep ii and than 20 gev for nlc .
we applied an isolation cut by requiring that the angle between any two final state particles is larger than @xmath34 .
the same cut was applied to the angle of the bosons with the beam pipe .
our results for the sensitivity of lep ii to the operators appearing in the effective lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) indicate that the reaction @xmath35 can provide limits on both anomalous couplings since @xmath36 fb , and we can expect around 300 events per year .
a 1@xmath37 deviation in the total cross section , assuming a higgs boson with mass of 100 gev , requires that , @xmath38 these results are similar to those arising from the analysis of the reaction @xmath39 @xcite , where a 1@xmath37 deviation implies @xmath40 . on the other hand , the reaction @xmath41 is almost insensitive to the anomalous coefficient @xmath24 . for a higgs boson mass of @xmath42 gev
, a 1@xmath37 deviation can be observed for @xmath43 tev@xmath44 . the small sm cross section for this process , @xmath45 fb , leads to very few events per year at lep ii , and in consequence , the constraints from this reaction are limited by the poor statistics . due to the increase on the available phase space , we are able to establish tighter constraints on the coefficients @xmath46 by studying the contribution of the operators ( [ lagrangian ] ) to these same processes at nlc . for instance , at @xmath47 gev , @xmath48 fb , which yields 2900 events per year assuming the expected luminosity for nlc ( @xmath49 fb@xmath32 ) . requiring a maximum deviation of 2@xmath37 in the total cross section , and assuming a higgs boson of 200 gev , we obtain the allowed ranges @xmath50 tev@xmath44 and @xmath51 tev@xmath44 .
unlike at lep ii , at nlc the best constraint on the anomalous couplings come from the reaction @xmath52 , which gives rise to @xmath53 events per year at @xmath47 gev .
figure [ fig:1 ] shows the effect of the anomalous operators ( [ lagrangian ] ) in the total cross section of this reaction .
a 2@xmath37 deviation in the total cross section sets the bounds , @xmath54 also for a 200 gev higgs boson .
furthermore , we can expect the new interactions to affect most the longitudinally polarized gauge bosons production due to the presence of the scalar higgs boson as intermediate state .
we tried to take advantage of this fact by studying the longitudinal @xmath55pair production which brings on a slightly better result , _
@xmath56 tev@xmath44 and @xmath57 tev@xmath44 for a 2@xmath37 effect .
unfortunately the improvement is very small because the requirement of polarized @xmath55 reduces by two orders of magnitude the total yield .
we have also investigated different distributions of the final state particles in order to search for kinematical cuts that could improve the nlc sensitivity .
the most promising variable is the photon transverse momentum which distribution is presented in fig . [ fig:2 ] for the unpolarized case .
we observe that the contribution of the anomalous couplings is larger in the high @xmath58 region .
therefore a cut of @xmath59 gev drastically reduces the background .
the improvement on @xmath46 bounds can be clearly seen from fig .
[ fig:3 ] where a 1 , 2 , and 3@xmath37 deviations in the total cross section is shown before and after the above cut is applied .
the contribution of the anomalous couplings is dominated by on mass shell higgs production with the subsequent @xmath60 decay .
the peak around @xmath61 gev in the photon transverse momentum distribution is due to the monochromatic photon with @xmath62 which is emitted in association with the 200 gev higgs boson .
therefore the best constraints are obtained at nlc for higgs boson masses in the range @xmath63 gev , where a on shell production is allowed .
we present in table [ tab:1 ] the limits on the coefficients @xmath24 and @xmath23 based on a @xmath64 deviation in the total cross section for a higgs mass in the range @xmath65 gev .
table [ tab:2 ] shows the same limits after the cut in the photon transverse momentum distribution of @xmath59 gev is implemented .
these results are comparable to the limits for @xmath24 and @xmath23 obtained from the study of the reaction @xmath39 presented in ref .
@xcite , suggesting that the processes considered here can be used as a complementary tool in the study of anomalous higgs interactions . in conclusion , the search for the effect of higher dimensional operators that give rise to anomalous higgs boson couplings may provide important information on physics beyond the standard model and should be pursued in all possible reactions .
we have studied here the triple vector boson production , @xmath22 and @xmath3 , in @xmath25 colliders focusing on the operators that generate only anomalous higgs boson couplings and can not be tested in the @xmath4pair production .
we established the limits that can be imposed at lep ii and nlc through the analysis of the deviations on the total cross section .
furthermore , we used the photon transverse momentum spectrum and polarization of the @xmath55 s to improve these constraints to few tev@xmath44 at the nlc .
we would like to thank m. c. gonzalez
garcia for very useful discussions .
this work was supported by conselho nacional de desenvolvimento cientfico e tecnolgico ( cnpq ) , and by fundao de amparo pesquisa do estado de so paulo ( fapesp ) .
h. aihara _ et al .
_ , summary of the working subgroup on anomalous gauge boson interactions of the dpf long - range planning study , to be published in _ electroweak symmetry breaking and beyond the standard model _ , edited by t. barklow , s. dawson , h. haber and j. siegrist , hep - ph/9503425 ; + z. ajaltuoni _ et al .
_ , triple gauge boson couplings " , in _ proceedings of the cern workshop on lep ii physics _ , edited by g. altarelli _ et al .
_ , cern 96 - 01 , vol .
1(1996 ) p.525 , hep - ph/9601233 ; + t. barklow _ et al .
_ , summary of the snowmass subgroup on anomalous gauge boson couplings , to appear in the _ proceedings of the 1996 dpf / dpb summer study on new directions in high - energy physics _ , june 25 july 12 ( 1996 ) , snowmass , co , usa , hep - ph/9611454
. for a review , see h. georgi , _ weak interactions and modern particle theory _
( benjamim / cummings , menlo park , 1984 ) ; j. f. donoghue , e. golowich and b. r.holstein , _ dynamics of the standard model _ ( cambridge university press , 1992 ) .
k. hagiwara , s. ishihara , r. szalapski and d.zeppenfeld , phys .
* b283 * ( 1992 ) 353 ; _ idem _ , phys .
* d48 * ( 1993 ) 2182 ; k. hagiwara , t. hatsukano , s. ishihara and r. szalapski , nucl .
* b496 * ( 1997 ) 66 .
p. mry , m. perrottet , and f. m. renard , z.phys .
* c38 * ( 1988 ) 579 ; a. barroso and l. bento , phys.rev .
* d38 * ( 1988 ) 2742 ; f. boudjema _ et al .
_ , in _ proceedings of @xmath25 collisions at 500 gev : the physics potencial _ , edited by p. zerwas
( desy report no .
92 - 123a , b , hamburg , germany , 1992 ) , p. 717 ; u. baur and e. l. berger , phys .
* d47 * ( 1993 ) 4889 .
k. hagiwara and m. l. stong , z. phys .
* 62 * ( 1994 ) 99 ; b. grzadowski and j. wudka , phys .
lett . * b364 * ( 1995 ) 49 ; g. j. gounaris , f. m. renard and n. d.vlachos , nucl .
* b459 * ( 1996 ) 51 ; w. killian , m.krmer and p. m. zerwas , phys .
* b381 * ( 1996 ) 243 .
.range of the allowed values of the coefficients @xmath24 and @xmath23 , in tev@xmath44 , for a @xmath64 deviation in the total cross section of the process @xmath66 at nlc . [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ] | experiments at cern lep ii electron positron collider explore gauge structure of @xmath0 and @xmath1 three point functions in @xmath4pair production @xcite deviations from standard predictions indicate new physics effects deviations parametrized in effective lagrangians adding sm lagrangian high dimension operators new phenomena @xcite approach for new at energy scale @xmath5 larger than electroweak scale effective lagrangians constructed with light particle spectrum at low energies heavy degrees freedom integrated invariant under @xmath6 involve boson fields light higgs particle dimension6 effective lagrangian sm bosonic fields @xmath7 @xmath8 constructed in ref @xcite explore new operators anomalous higgs boson couplings without interaction anomalous interactions by lep ii results on pair production study reactions @xmath9 and @xmath3 triple vector boson coupling @xmath10 @xmath11 anomalous higgs interactions no higgs contributions to reactions at tree level couplings generated at one loop @xcite eleven independent operators constructed in ref.@xcite describe interactions higgs particle vector bosons @xmath12 higgs doublet becomes @xmath13^t$ @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 field strength tensors of @xmath18 @xmath19 gauge fields operators contribute to anomalous higgs couplings @xmath20 @xmath21 contribution self boson couplings @xmath0 @xmath1 absorbed in redefinition sm fields gauge couplings no new @xmath22 @xmath3 vertices generated via operators studies anomalous trilinear gauge boson couplings insensitive to coefficients @xmath23 @xmath24 anomalous higgs boson couplings studied in higgs z boson decays @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 colliders limits dimension6 operators new higgs interactions examine total @xmath22 @xmath3 yield kinematical distributions final state particles at lep ii next linear collider analysis @xmath28 @xmath29 reactions standard one loop higgs contributions@xmath3 production involves seven feynman contributions @xmath22 ten standard diagrams incorporated anomalous couplings in @xcite subroutines madgraph @xcite output anomalous contributions code passed test electromagnetic gauge invariance investigate @xmath3 @xmath22 production at lep ii and nlc assuming center mass energy @xmath30 500 gev integrated luminosity @xmath31 50 fb@xmath32 required photon energy @xmath33 larger than 5 gev for lep ii 20 gev for nlc applied isolation cut angle between final state particles larger than @xmath34 same angle bosons with beam pipe results lep ii operators lagrangian indicate reaction @xmath35 limits on anomalous couplings since @xmath36 300 events per year 1@xmath37 deviation in cross section higgs boson mass 100 gev requires @xmath38 results similar to reaction @xmath39 1@xmath37 deviation implies @xmath40 reaction @xmath41 insensitive to anomalous coefficient @xmath24 higgs boson mass @xmath42 gev 1@xmath37 deviation observed for @xmath43@xmath44small sm cross section @xmath45 fb leads few events at lep ii constraints limited by poor statistics increase available phase space establish tighter constraints on coefficients @xmath46 studying contribution operators lagrangian at nlc @xmath47 gev @xmath48 fb yields 2900 events per year expected luminosity nlc @xmath49 fb@xmath32 ) maximum deviation 2@xmath37 higgs boson 200 gev obtain allowed ranges @xmath50 tev@xmath44 and @xmath51 tev@xmath44 nlc best constraint on anomalous couplings from reaction @xmath52 @xmath53 events per year at @xmath47 gev figure shows effect anomalous operators section 2@xmath37 deviation sets bounds @xmath54 for 200 gev higgs boson new interactions affect longitudinally polarized gauge bosons production scalar higgs boson longitudinal @xmath55pair production better result @xmath56 tev@xmath44 @xmath57 tev@xmath44 for 2@xmath37 effect improvement small requirement of polarized @xmath55 reduces total yieldinvestigated distributions final state particles cuts nlc sensitivity promising variable photon transverse momentum presented in fig unpolarized case contribution anomalous couplings larger in high @xmath58 region cut of @xmath59 gev reduces background improvement on @xmath46 bounds seen from fig 1 2 3@xmath37 deviations cross section shown before after cut contribution anomalous couplings dominated by on mass shell higgs production @xmath60 decay peak around @xmath61 gev due to monochromatic photon with @xmath62 200 gev higgs boson best constraints at nlc for higgs boson masses range @xmath63 gev on shell production allowed table limits on coefficients @xmath24 @xmath23 based @xmath64 deviation for higgs mass range @xmath65 gev table shows limits after cut photon transverse momentum @xmath59 gev results comparable to limits @xmath24 @xmath23 study reaction @xmath39 processes complementary tool study anomalous higgs interactionssearch for higher dimensional operators anomalous higgs boson couplings information physics beyond standard model pursued reactions studied triple vector boson production @xmath22 @xmath3 in @xmath25 colliders anomalous higgs couplings @xmath4pair production established limits at lep ii nlc deviations total cross section used photon transverse momentum spectrum polarization @xmath55 s improve constraints@xmath44 at nlc m. c. gonzalez garcia for discussions work supported by conselho nacional desenvolvimento tecnolgico fundao de amparo pesquisa do estado de so paulo h aihara summary working subgroup on anomalous gauge boson interactions dpf long - range planning study electroweak symmetry breaking beyond standard model edited by t barklow dawson haber siegrist/9503425 z. ajaltuoni triple gauge boson couplings proceedings cern workshop on lep ii physics g. altarelli cern 96 - 01 vol 1(1996 ) p.525summary snowmass subgroup anomalous gauge boson couplings proceedings 1996 dpf summer study high - energy physics june 25 july 12 1996 snowmass usa hep - ph/9611454 review h. georgi weak interactions modern particle theory benjamim cummings menlo park 1984 j f donoghue golowich b r.holstein dynamics standard model cambridge university press 1992 k hagiwara s r szalapski d.zeppenfeld b283 1992 ) 353 d48 1993 ) 2182 hagiwara hatsukano ishihara szalapski b496 1997 ) 66 p. mry m perrottet renard c38 1988 ) 579 a barroso l. bento phys 1988 ) 2742 f boudjema proceedings @xmath25 collisions 500 gev edited p. zerwas report 92 - 123a hamburg germany 1992 p 717 u. baur l berger phys d47 1993 ) 4889 k. hagiwara stong 62 1994 ) 99 b grzadowski j. wudka phys b364 1995 ) 49gounaris renard d.vlachos nucl. b459 1996 ) 51 killian m.krmer zerwas . b381 1996 ) 243 allowed values coefficients @xmath24 @xmath23@xmath44 @xmath64 deviation cross section process @xmath66 nlc cols="^,^",options="header " | 0.501399 | 3,170 | 1,675 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,260 | we study the associated production of selectrons and neutralinos with subsequent leptonic decay of the selectron in @xmath0 scattering within the framework of mssm and nmssm . due to the weak couplings of singlino dominated neutralinos , associated neutralino production @xmath1 at a linear collider
can be strongly suppressed in some regions of the parameter space .
then the process @xmath2 can give additional informations on the underlying theory and the character of @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
11.30.pb , 12.60.jv , 14.80.ly wue - itp-2000 - 023 + hep - ph / xxxxxxx + , , | supersymmetry is up to now one of the most attractive theories beyond the standardmodel ( sm ) .
but from the theoretical point of view there exist many ways for a supersymmetric extension of the sm .
one of the widely used models is the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) that has minimal content in the higgs sector .
the masses , mixings and couplings of the four neutralinos are determined by the parameters @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
the minimal extension of the mssm by a higgs singlet field @xmath9 is the next - to - minimal supersymmetric standard model ( nmssm ) @xcite .
the neutralino sector now contains five neutralinos being mixtures of the mssm gauginos and higgsinos and an additional singlino @xmath10 . the nmssm neutralino mixing depends on the parameters @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath8 , the singlet vacuum expectation value @xmath11 and the trilinear couplings @xmath12 and @xmath13 @xcite . for large values of @xmath11 the singlino dominated neutralino decouples and the remaining four neutralinos
have the same masses and characters as in the mssm if one identifies @xmath14 @xcite .
the linear collider ( lc ) will first run in the @xmath15-mode .
however , associated neutralino production @xmath16 may not give sufficient evidence for a discrimination between mssm and nmssm , especially if this is the only kinematical accesible neutralino production process in the @xmath15-mode .
in our contribution we want to investigate the possibilities to distinguish between the models with the help of @xmath0 scattering @xmath2 .
we first study the associated production of left / right selectrons and the lightest neutralino ( lsp ) in @xmath0 scattering .
the high energetic photon comes from compton back - scattering of laser photons off one electron beam at a lc .
the production proceeds via s - channel exchange of an electron and t - channel exchange of selectrons .
the formulas for special cases are given in @xcite , the complete analytical expressions for the differential and total cross sections for polarized beams will be given in a forthcoming paper @xcite .
the subsequent decay of the selectrons in electrons and the lsp leads to an @xmath18 and missing energy in the final state .
the total cross section for the production and decay in the @xmath19-cms depends on the polarisation @xmath20 of the electron beam , the helicity @xmath21 of the laser photon and the helicity @xmath22 of the converted electron beam . in fig . 1 we show the contours of constant total cross sections for the process @xmath23 in the @xmath6-@xmath7-plane for the mssm and the @xmath6-@xmath11-plane for the nmssm for @xmath24 gev .
for the calculations we choose the longitudinal polarisation of the electron beam @xmath25 , the helicity of the converted electron beam @xmath26 and the helicity of the laser photon @xmath27 .
this set of polarisations can be achieved at tesla and leads to the most significant contours .
we set @xmath28 , the common scalar mass @xmath29 gev and use the gut relation @xmath30 .
the trilinear couplings are choosen as @xmath31 and @xmath32 ( fig .
1b ) , @xmath31 and @xmath33 ( fig .
1c ) and @xmath34 and @xmath33 ( fig .
1d ) . if in the nmssm the @xmath3 is dominated by the singlino content the production is supressed , because electron and selectron only couple to the gaugino components of the neutralino
. then the total cross section is smaller than 1 fb in some parameter regions ( fig .
1b - d ) and probably lies below the detection limit of a @xmath0 collider .
otherwise one obtains cross sections similar to the mssm . for @xmath35
there also exist a small band with 1 fb @xmath36 10 fb ( fig .
1c / d ) . in this region
the @xmath3 is the mainly singlino - like , but nevertheless it will be very difficult to extract this small signal from the background @xmath37 @xcite .
[ fig1 ] ( 13.9,12.8 ) ( -1.2,1.9 ) ( 3.2,12.6)(a ) ( 3.2,5.9)(c ) ( 10.38,12.6)(b ) ( 10.38,5.9)(d ) ( 6.0,1.9 ) ( -1.2,-4.8 ) ( 6.0,-4.8 )
in this section we consider two cases : ( a ) @xmath3 has singlino character and @xmath38 corresponds to @xmath39 ; ( b ) @xmath40 is singlino dominated and @xmath3 is similar in nmssm and mssm . in table 1
we present four reference scenarios i , ii ( a ) and iii , iv ( b ) with fixed @xmath41 and @xmath42 for comparison . in all scenarios the lightest mssm - like neutralino
is dominated by gaugino components , which couple to electrons and selectrons , while the higgsino components do not . for @xmath43 and @xmath44 ,
the only channel for direct production of neutralinos in @xmath15 annihilation is @xmath45 .
however , if one of the neutralinos is mainly singlino this process will be suppressed .
the cross sections for the process @xmath45 in fig .
2a are calculated with longitudinal polarisations @xmath46 of the electron beam and @xmath47 of the positron beam .
2b / c shows the cross sections for @xmath48 with polarisations @xmath25 , @xmath26 and @xmath27 in the reference scenarios . in all scenarios
we fix the masses @xmath49 gev and @xmath50 gev . .reference scenarios with fixed @xmath41 and @xmath42 ( signs of the mass eigenvalues in brackets ) . in scenario
i and ii the @xmath3 is mainly singlino and in scenario iii and iv @xmath40 is singlino - like . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] ... we expect for @xmath51 a production cross section of @xmath52 fb for scenario i and @xmath53 fb for scenario ii at @xmath24 gev ( fig .
the smaller cross section in scenario ii is due to the different relative signs of @xmath41 and @xmath42 , which leads to cancellations in the interference terms @xcite .
now it will be a question of luminosity and background supression , whether the cross sections are measurable .
even if a signal is detected , the decision whether @xmath3 or @xmath40 is the singlino dominated neutralino will be difficult since the cross sections are very similar ( @xmath52 fb in scenario i and @xmath54 fb in scenario iii , see fig .
2a ) . in @xmath0
scattering the process @xmath55 will be strongly supressed ( see sec . 1 ) .
then the first detectable neutralino production process at a high luminosity collider will be @xmath56 .
2c shows total cross sections of @xmath57 fb in scenarios i and ii at @xmath24 gev which further increase for higher energies .
this process , however , will lead to a completely different final state compared to the lsp - selectron production because of the additional decay of the @xmath40 @xcite .
therefore one can decide via detection of the @xmath0 process that the @xmath3 is mainly singlino .
if the @xmath15 cross section is too small for detection , the production and decay of @xmath40 together with @xmath58 in @xmath0 will be the first direct production process of neutralinos that would be measurable at @xmath24 gev with high luminosity .
the non - detection of the @xmath59 production suggests a singlino - like @xmath3 and therefore extended supersymmetry as the underlying theory .
[ fig2 ] ( 13.9,8.8 ) ( 3.2,8.6)(a ) ( 10.38,8.6)(b ) ( 6.8,4.2)(c ) ( -1.2,-2.0 ) ( 6.0,-2.0 ) ( 2.4,-6.4 ) ... we expect for @xmath51 a production cross section @xmath54 fb in scenario iii and @xmath60 fb in scenario iv at @xmath24 gev . if one assumes these cross section to be detectable one again can use @xmath0 scattering to decide which neutralino is singlino dominated . the detection of the process @xmath55 would prove the singlino character of @xmath40 . in scenario iii and
iv one obtains @xmath61 fb for @xmath24 gev ( fig .
if , however , the cross section for associated neutralino production in @xmath15 annihilation can not be observed , the process @xmath55 would be the first process for direct production of neutralinos .
but this process alone does not aalow to discriminate between the mssm and the nmssm .
* for a singlino dominated @xmath3 the associated production of selectrons and the lsp in @xmath0-scattering will be strongly suppressed .
* @xmath62 could be the first process to identify neutralinos and to determine the underlying supersymmetric model . *
if neutralino pair production @xmath63 gives evidence for a neutralino with singlino character , the @xmath0 process can be used to decide , whether @xmath3 or @xmath40 is singlino dominated .
j. ellis , j.f .
gunion , h.e .
haber , l. roszkowski , f. zwirner , phys .
d 39 * ( 1989 ) 844 ; + m. drees , int .
j. of mod .
a 4 * ( 1989 ) 3635 ; + t. elliot , s.f .
king , and p.l .
white , phys . lett .
* b 314 * ( 1993 ) 56 ; phys . rev . *
d 49 * ( 1994 ) 2435 ; + u. ellwanger , m. rausch de traubenberg , and c.a .
savoy , phys . lett . * b 315 * ( 1993 ) 331 ; + b.r .
kim , a. stephan , and s.k .
oh , phys .
* b 336 * ( 1994 ) 200 ; + f. franke and h. fraas , int .
a12 * ( 1997 ) 479 .
f. franke , h. fraas and a. bartl , _ phys .
_ b336 ( 1994 ) 415 ; + u. ellwanger and c. hugonie , _ eur .
phys . j. _ c5 ( 1998 ) 723 ; _ eur .
j. _ c13 ( 2000 ) 681 . j. a. grifols , r. pascual , _ phys .
_ b135 ( 1984 ) 319 .
+ f. cuypers , g. j. van oldenborgh , r. rckl , _ nucl .
_ b383 ( 1992 ) 45 .
+ f. cuypers , g. j. van oldenborgh , r. rckl , mpi - ph/93 - 70 , lmu-93/12 . c. blchinger , h. fraas , in preparation .
s. hesselbach , f. franke , and h. fraas , wue - itp-2000 - 008 , hep - ph/0003272 , contribution to the proceedings of the _
2nd joint ecfa / desy study on physics and detectors for a linear electron - positron collider_. m. baillargeon , g. blanger , f. boudjema , enslapp - a-473/94 . f. franke and h. fraas , z. phys . * c 72 * ( 1996 ) 309 . | supersymmetry attractive beyond standardmodel many ways for supersymmetric extension used minimal supersymmetric standard model minimal content higgs sector masses mixings couplings four neutralinos determined by parameters @xmath5 minimal extension by higgs singlet field @xmath9 next - to - minimal supersymmetric standard model @xcite neutralino sector contains five neutralinos mssm gauginos higgsinos additional singlino @xmath10 nmssm neutralino mixing depends on parameters @xmath5 singlet vacuum expectation value @xmath11 trilinear couplings @xmath12 large values of @xmath11 singlino dominated neutralino decouples remaining four neutralinos same masses characters as mssm @xmath14 @xcite linear collider lc ) in @xmath15-mode associated neutralino production @xmath16 discrimination between mssm nmssm neutralino production-mode investigate distinguish models @xmath0 scattering @xmath2 study production of left / right selectrons lightest neutralino lsp ) in @xmath0 scattering high energetic photon from back - scattering laser photons off electron beam lcproduction via s - channel exchange electron t - channel selectrons formulas for special cases in @xcite analytical expressions differential total cross sections polarized beams in forthcoming paper decay selectrons leads to @xmath18 missing energy final state total cross section production decay @xmath19-cms depends on polarisation electron beam helicity laser photon helicity converted electron beam fig . 1 contours constant total cross sections process @xmath23 in @xmath6-@xmath7-plane mssm--plane nmssm @xmath24 gev calculations choose longitudinal polarisation electron beam helicity converted electron beam helicity laser photon polarisations achieved at tesla to significant contours set @xmath28 common scalar mass @xmath29 gev use gut relation @xmath30 trilinear couplings @xmath31 @xmath32 if nmssm @xmath3 dominated by singlino content production supressed electron selectron couple to gaugino components neutralino total cross section smaller than 1 fb in some parameter regions1b - d below detection limit @xmath0 collider cross sections similar mssm @xmath35 small band 1 fb @xmath36 10 fb fig . 1c / d ) @xmath3 mainly singlino - like difficult extract small signal @xmath37 @xcite fig1 13.9,12.8 ) -1.2,1.9 ) 3.2,12.6) 3.2 10.38,12.6) 6.0,1.9 ) -1.2,-4.8 ) two cases @xmath3 singlino character @xmath38 corresponds @xmath39 @xmath40 singlino dominated @xmath3 similar nmssm mssm table 1 four reference scenarios @xmath41 @xmath42 lightest mssm - like neutralino dominated gaugino components couple electrons selectrons higgsino components @xmath43 @xmath44 only channel production neutralinos @xmath45 singlino process suppressed cross sections @xmath45 fig . 2a calculated longitudinal polarisations @xmath46 electron @xmath47 positron beam 2b / c cross sections @xmath48 polarisations @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27scenarios fix masses @xmath49 @xmath50 gev scenarios fixed @xmath41 @xmath42 mass eigenvalues brackets scenario i ii @xmath3 mainly singlino iii iv @xmath40 singlino - like expect @xmath51 production cross section @xmath52 fb scenario i @xmath53 fb ii @xmath24 gev smaller cross section scenario ii different signs @xmath41 @xmath42 leads cancellations interference question luminosity background supression cross sections measurable decision @xmath3 @xmath40 singlino dominated neutralino difficult cross sections similar @xmath52 fb scenario i @xmath54 fb iii @xmath0 scattering process @xmath55 strongly supressed first detectable neutralino production process high luminosity collider @xmath56 cross sections @xmath57 fb scenarios i ii @xmath24 gev increase higher energies process different final state lsp - selectron production additional decay @xmath40 @xcite decide detection @xmath0 process @xmath3 mainly singlino@xmath15 cross section small detection production decay @xmath40 @xmath58 first production neutralinos at @xmath24 gev high luminosity non - detection @xmath59 production suggests singlino - like @xmath3 extended supersymmetry fig2 13.9,8.8 3.2,8.6)(a 10.38,8.6)(b,4.2)(c -1.2,-2.0 6.0,-2.0 2.4,-6.4 @xmath51 production cross section @xmath54 fb scenario iii @xmath60 fb scenario iv @xmath24 gev cross detectable @xmath0 scattering decide neutralino singlino dominated detection @xmath55 singlino character @xmath40 scenario iii iv obtains @xmath61 fb for @xmath24 gev cross section neutralino production @xmath15 @xmath55 first direct production neutralinos discriminate mssm nmssm singlino dominated @xmath3 production selectrons lsp @xmath0-scattering suppressed @xmath62 first process identify neutralinos determine supersymmetric model neutralino pair production @xmath63 singlino character @xmath0 process decide @xmath3 @xmath40 singlino dominated j. ellis gunion haber roszkowskizwirner phys 39 1989 ) 844 m. drees 4 1989 ) 3635 t. elliot s king p.l white phys 314 1993 ) 56 phys 49 1994 ) 2435 u. ellwanger rausch traubenberg savoy lett 315 1993 ) 331 b kim stephan s.k oh 336 1994 ) 200 f. franke h. fraas a12 1997 ) 479 f. franke h fraas bartl b336 1994 ) 415 u. ellwanger c. hugonie c5 1998 ) 723 c13 2000 ) 681 grifols pascual phys b135 1984 ) 319 f. cuypers g j van oldenborgh rckl b383 1992 ) 45 f. cuypers van oldenborgh rckl mpi - ph/93 - 70 lmu-93/12 blchinger h. fraas hesselbach f. franke h. fraas itp-2000 - 008 - ph/0003272 contribution proceedings 2nd joint ecfa desy study physics detectors linear electron - positron colliderbaillargeon blanger boudjema a-473/94 franke h fraas z 72 1996 ) 309 | 0.43108 | 2,788 | 1,497 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,268 | we use the clustering results obtained by madgwick et al .
( 2003 ) for a sample of 96,791 2df galaxies with redshift @xmath0 to study the distribution of late - type and early - type galaxies within dark matter haloes of different mass .
the adopted method relies on the connection between the distribution of sources within haloes and their clustering properties by focussing on the issue of the halo occupation function i.e. the probability distribution of the number of galaxies brighter than some luminosity threshold hosted by a virialized halo of given mass . within this framework
, the distribution of galaxies within haloes is shown to determine galaxy - galaxy clustering on small scales , being responsible for the observed power - law behaviour at separations @xmath1 mpc . for a more extended analysis
, we refer the reader to magliocchetti & porciani ( 2003 ) .
galaxies : clustering - cosmology : theory - cosmology : observations | our approach follows the one adopted by scoccimarro et al .
( 2001 ) ; in this framework , the galaxy - galaxy correlation function can be written as + @xmath2 where the first term @xmath3 accounts for pairs of galaxies residing within the same halo , while the @xmath4 represents the contribution coming from galaxies in different haloes .
the above quantities can be written as a function of the mean number of galaxies per halo of mass @xmath5 , @xmath6 , of the spread about this mean value ( also dependent on the mass of the halo hosting the galaxies ) , @xmath7 , of the mean comoving number density of galaxies , @xmath8 ( where @xmath9 is the halo mass function which gives the number density of dark matter haloes per unit mass and volume ) , of the two - point cross - correlation function between haloes of mass @xmath10 and @xmath11 , @xmath12 and finally of the ( spatial ) density distribution of galaxies within the haloes , @xmath13 .
@xmath6 and @xmath7 are the first and second moment of the halo occupation function @xmath14 which gives the probability for a halo of specified mass @xmath5 to contain @xmath15 galaxies .
these can be parameterized as @xmath16 and @xmath17 with @xmath18 in the different mass ranges @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 . according to this approach , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 are parameters to be determined by comparison with observations .
the last ingredient needed for the description of 2-point galaxy clustering is the spatial distribution of galaxies within their haloes .
the first , easiest approach one can take is to assume that galaxies follow the dark matter profile ( navarro , frenk & white 1997 , hereafter nfw ) .
however , since this assumption is not necessarily true , in the present analysis we also consider spatial distributions of the form @xmath26 , with @xmath27 , where the first value corresponds to the singular isothermal sphere case .
all the above profiles have been initially truncated at the virial radius @xmath28 , as one expects galaxies to form within virialized regions , where the overdensity is greater than a certain threshold . however
, this might not be the only possible choice since for instance as a consequence of halo - halo merging
galaxies might also be found in the outer regions of the newly - formed halo , at a distance from the center greater than @xmath28 . in order to perform our analysis ,
we have considered the 4-dimensional grid : @xmath29 ; @xmath30 ; @xmath31 ; @xmath32 .
combinations of these four quantities have then been used to evaluate the mean number density of galaxies @xmath33 . only values for @xmath33 within 2@xmath34 from the observed ones ( derived from the luminosity functions obtained by madgwick et al .
2002 ) were accepted and the corresponding values for @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath22 and @xmath23 have subsequently been plugged into equation ( [ eq : xi ] ) to produce for a specified choice of the distribution profile the predicted galaxy - galaxy correlation function to be compared with the madwick et al .
( 2003 ) results on late - type and early - type galaxies by means of a least squares ( @xmath35 ) fit . 1 .
early - type galaxies ( see figure 1 ) are well described by a halo occupation number of the form broken power - law with @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 and @xmath39 , where the two quantities which determine the intermediate - to - high mass behaviour of @xmath40 are measured with a good accuracy .
2 . no model can provide a reasonable fit to the correlation function of late - type galaxies since they all show an excess of power with respect to the data on scales @xmath41\simlt 2 $ ] . in order to obtain an acceptable description of the observations
, one has to assume that star - forming galaxies are distributed within haloes of masses comparable to those of groups and clusters up to two virial radii .
this result is consistent with the phenomenon of morphological segregation whereby late - type galaxies are mostly found in the outer regions of groups or clusters ( extending well beyond their virial radii ) , while passive objects preferentially sink into their centres .
3 . with the above result in mind
, one finds that late - type galaxies ( see figure 2 ) can be described by a halo occupation number of the form single power - law with @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath44 , where the quantities which describe @xmath40 in the high - mass regime are determined with a high degree of accuracy .
4 . within the framework of our models ,
galaxies of any kind seem to follow the underlying distribution of dark matter within haloes as they present the same degree of spatial concentration .
in fact the data indicates both early - type and late - type galaxies to be distributed within their host haloes according to nfw profiles .
we note however that , even though early - type galaxies can also be described by means of a shallower distribution of the form @xmath45 with @xmath46 , this can not be accepted as a fair modelling of the data in the case of late - type galaxies which instead allow for somehow steeper ( @xmath47 profiles . in no case
a @xmath48 density run can provide an acceptable description of the observed correlation function .
these conclusions depend somehow on assuming a specific functional form for the second moment of the halo occupation distribution .
however , magliocchetti & porciani ( 2003 ) have shown that there is not much freedom in the choice of this function if one wants to accurately match the observational data .
an interesting point to note is that results on the spatial distribution of galaxies within haloes and on their halo occupation number are independent from each other .
there is no degeneracy in the determination of @xmath40 and @xmath49 as they dominate the behaviour of the two - point correlation function @xmath50 at different scales .
different distribution profiles in fact principally determine the slope of @xmath50 on small enough ( @xmath51 mpc ) scales which probe the inner regions of the haloes , while the halo occupation number is mainly responsible for the overall normalization of @xmath50 and for its slope on large - to - intermediate scales .
our analysis shows that late - type galaxies can be hosted in haloes with masses smaller than it is the case for early - type objects .
this is probably due to the fact that early - type galaxies are on average more massive ( where the term here refers to stellar mass ) than star - forming objects , especially if one considers the population of irregulars , and points to a relationship between stellar mass of galaxies and mass of the dark matter haloes which host them . 1 madgwick d.s .
( the 2dfgrs team ) , 2002 , mnras , 333 , 133 madgwick d.s . , et al .
( the 2dfgrs team ) , 2003 , mnras , submitted ( astro - ph/0303668 ) magliocchetti m. , porciani c. , 2003 , to appear on mnras , astro - ph/0304003 navarro j.f . , frenk c.s .
, white s.d.m . , 1997 ,
apj , 490 , 493 scoccimarro r. , sheth r.k .
, hui l.,jain b. , 2001 , apj , 546 , 20 | approach follows scoccimarro et 2001 galaxy - galaxy correlation function written as + @xmath2 first term @xmath3 galaxies same halo @xmath4 from galaxies different haloes quantities function of mean number galaxies per halo @xmath5 spread value dependent on mass halo @xmath7 mean density of galaxies @xmath8 @xmath9 halo mass function density dark matter haloes per unit mass two - point cross - correlation between haloes spatial density distribution of galaxies within haloes @xmath13 @xmath6 @xmath7 first second moment of halo occupation function @xmath14 probability for halo mass contain @xmath15 galaxies parameterized as @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 in different mass ranges @xmath19 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 parameters determined by comparison with observations last ingredient for 2-point galaxy clustering spatial distribution of galaxies within haloes galaxies follow dark matter profile ( navarro frenk & white 1997assumption not true present analysis spatial distributions form @xmath26 @xmath27 first value corresponds singular isothermal sphere case profiles truncated at virial radius @xmath28 galaxies form virialized regions overdensity greater not only possible choice halo - halo merging galaxies found in outer regions halo distance from center greater than @xmath28 considered 4-dimensional grid : @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath32 combinations four quantities evaluate mean density of galaxies @xmath33 values for @xmath33 within 2@xmath34 accepted values for @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath22 @xmath23 plugged into equation produce distribution predicted galaxy - galaxy correlation function compared with madwick et al . 2003 ) results on late - type early - type galaxies least squares ( @xmath35 ) fit early - type galaxies figure described by halo occupation number form broken power - law with @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath39 quantities intermediate - to - high mass behaviour of @xmath40 measured good accuracyno model fit correlation function of late - type galaxies show excess power data on scales @xmath41 acceptable star - forming galaxies distributed within haloes comparable to groups up to two virial radii consistent with morphological segregation late - type galaxies in outer regions of groups clusters beyond virial radii passive objects sink into centres late - type galaxies figure 2 described by halo occupation number single power - law with @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 quantities describe @xmath40 high - mass regime determined with high accuracy galaxies follow distribution dark matter within haloes same spatial concentration data indicates early - and late - type galaxies distributed within host haloes according to nfw profiles early - type galaxies can described shallower distribution of form @xmath45 with @xmath46 accepted fair modelling late - type galaxies allow for steeper @xmath47 profiles @xmath48 density run acceptable description of correlation function conclusions depend on assuming specific functional form for second moment of halo occupation distribution magliocchetti & porciani 2003 much freedom in choice function match observational dataresults spatial distribution galaxies within haloes halo occupation number independent no degeneracy in determination @xmath40 @xmath49 dominate correlation @xmath50 at different scales distribution profiles determine slope @xmath50 on small scales halo occupation number for normalization @xmath50 slope on large intermediate scales analysis shows late - type galaxies hosted in haloes with masses smaller than early - type objects due to early - type galaxies more massive than star - forming objects relationship between stellar mass mass dark matter haloes madgwick d.s . 2002 mnras , 333 , 133 madgwick d 2003 mnras astro - ph/0303668 magliocchetti m. porciani c. , 2003 mnras astro - ph/0304003 navarro j.f frenk c.s white s.d.m 1997 apj , 490 , 493 scoccimarro r sheth r hui l.,jain b. 2001 apj , 546 , 20 | 0.267996 | 1,665 | 861 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,269 | we analyse the curvature representation of the gonihedric action @xmath0 for the cases when the dependence on the dihedral angle is arbitrary
. = 23.8 cm = 15 cm = -1.2 cm * * | there is a strong belief that qcd is equivalent to a string theory and that this equivalence could play an important role in the development of the theory of strong interactions @xcite .
the solution of the two - dimensional qcd in terms of strings has been invoked to put forward the ultimate conjecture that qcd is actually equivalent to string theory .
the @xmath1 string has the property to suppress folding of the surface and therefore has a kind of extrinsic curvature @xcite . in the recent articles @xcite the authors suggested a geometrical string , which directly extends the notion of the feynman integral over paths to an integral over surfaces . in this theory the surface which degenerates into a single particle world line
has an amplitude which is proportional to the length of world line .
this approach was motivated by the fact that in the first approximation the motion of the particle with internal structure is described by the action which should be proportional to the length of the spacetime path @xcite .
this principle , together with the continuity principle allows to define the action of the theory @xmath0 . for the smooth surfaces this action is proportional to the mean extrinsic curvature and
has the property to suppress the folding of the surface @xcite .
the degree of suppression depends on the gonimetric factor @xmath2 in the definition of the action @xmath0 and can be made arbitrary large .
for that the @xmath2 should grow fast enough near the dihedral angles close to @xmath3 which describe a flat surfaces @xcite . in the subsequent publication @xcite
the authors have found that the action @xmath0 has an equivalent representation in terms of the total curvature @xmath4 of the polygons @xmath5 which appear in the intersection of the plane @xmath6 with the given surface @xmath7 .
the curvature @xmath4 should then be integrated over all planes @xmath6 intersecting the surface @xmath7 .
this representation has been proven for the special case of the action @xmath0 , when the action depends linearly on dihedral angle @xmath8 . to provide necessary rigidity of the polygons @xmath9 and the corresponding suppression of the folding of the surface it is important to have generalization of the curvature representation for the cases when the dependence on the dihedral angle @xmath8 is arbitrary @xcite .
the aim of this article is to perform numerical analyses of the curvature representation of the gonihedric action for the cases when dependence on the dihedral angle is arbitrary .
the gonihedric string has been formulated in an euclidean space @xmath10 , where the feynman integral coincides with the partition function for the randomly fluctuating surfaces . in the continuum euclidean
space @xmath10 the random surface is associated with a connected polyhedral surface @xmath7 with vertex coordinates @xmath11 , where @xmath12 and @xmath13 is the number of the vertices .
the action is defined as @xcite @xmath14 where the gonimetric factor @xmath2 is defined as @xmath15 @xmath16 the summation is over all edges @xmath17 of @xmath7 and @xmath18 is a dihedral angle between two neighbor faces ( flat triangles ) of @xmath7 in @xmath10 having a common edge @xmath17 .
the property ( 3 ) always allows to consider the argument of the @xmath2 function to be in the interval @xmath19 in all subsequent computations .
one can say that we are measuring the dihedral angle @xmath18 from that side of the surface where it is less than @xmath3 . as it is easy to see the action indeed has the physical dimension of the length and the degree of the suppression of the folding of the surface depends on @xmath2 @xcite . in cases
when the @xmath2 is equal to @xmath20 and @xmath21 the suppression can be made arbitrary large .
the physical properties of this model and possible connection with qcd have been discussed in @xcite . as we stress above the new representation of action @xmath0
have been proven @xcite for the special case when the factor @xmath2 is linear @xmath22 in the present article we shall perform the numerical analyses of the curvature representation for the cases when the dependence on the dihedral angle is arbitrary .
the numerical integration shows that one can always select the dependence from the dihedral angle so as to provide necessary rigidity of the polygons @xmath23 and therefore corresponding suppression of the folding of the surfaces .
this may help to proceed with the analytical results for the general case .
if we denote by @xmath24 the angle which appears in the intersection of the plane @xmath6 with dihedral angle @xmath18 of the edge @xmath17 , then the total curvature @xmath4 of the polygon or polygons appearing in the intersection is equal to the following sum @xcite @xmath25 here we imply that @xmath24 is equal to @xmath3 for the edges @xmath17 which are not intersected by the given plane @xmath6 . with this definitions the gonihedric action @xmath0 is equal to @xcite @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the invariant measure of two - dimensional planes @xmath6 in @xmath28 @xcite .
this measure can be defined explicitly in @xmath28 through the coordinates of the unit vector @xmath29 which is normal to the plane @xmath6 and through the distance @xmath30 of the plane @xmath6 from the origin @xcite @xmath31 to prove the representation ( 6 ) let us substitute ( 5 ) and ( 7 ) into ( 6 ) , this yields @xcite @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 where @xmath35 now one should prove , that @xmath36 in ( 9 ) , after averaging over all orientations of the plane @xmath6 is indeed equal to @xmath37 ( 4 ) .
this has been proven in @xcite , but here we will present a new proof which allows to apply numerical integration to more complicated cases .
we have the following expression for @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the angle in the intersection of the plane @xmath6 with dihedral angle @xmath8 .
it is very hard to integrate directly ( 9 ) and ( 10 ) to get ( 4 ) . instead of
that we would like to remark , that from ( 9 ) and ( 10 ) it follows that @xmath42 and that @xmath43 where as before we imply that all angles are in the interval @xmath19 ( see property ( 2 ) ) .
the basic property of the dihedral angle @xmath44 is the @xmath45 property @xmath46 which follows from the geometrical picture or one can check it directly using explicit formula ( 10 ) . now substituting ( 13 ) into ( 9 ) and using ( 12 )
we will get @xmath47 the last functional equation together with the boundary condition ( 11 ) has unique solution @xmath48 this completes the proof of the curvature representation ( 6 ) and ( 5 ) for @xmath0 in the particular case ( 4 ) .
our aim is to extend this result into the cases when @xmath36 is an arbitrary function of @xmath37 .
generally one can expect that @xmath49 where the extended curvature @xmath50 is defined as @xmath51 and the function @xmath52 is defined by the integration over all planes @xmath6 @xmath53 now the problem is to select an appropriate function @xmath54 in the definition of the total curvature @xmath50 such that the integration over all planes @xmath6 will produce the gonimetric factor @xmath2 with the necessary properties ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) .
the most important cases are when @xmath54 is a power of @xmath55 @xmath56 or a root function @xmath57 it is also interesting to compute the two angle correlation function @xmath58 which is defined by the integral @xmath59 as it is easy to see from ( 9),(10 ) and from the last integral it is almost impossible to compute these explicitly , therefore we should use the numerical integration to study their behaviour .
in figure 1 we show the result of the integration over all planes @xmath60 in ( 18 ) for various functions @xmath54 .
as we see the qualitative behaviour of the gonimetric function @xmath2 is very similar to the behaviour of the corresponding @xmath54 function .
[ fig31 ] [ fig32 ] therefore it is reasonable to ask how big is the deformation " of the functions ( 19 ) and ( 20 ) after integration over all planes @xmath60 in ( 18 ) , that is the magnitude of the differences @xmath61 or @xmath62 in figure 2 one can see that the differences are not very large , but the equality between these two quantities is definitely excluded . only for @xmath63 does the equality hold @xcite .
the question to which we can not get an answer by numerical analyses is how to select the function @xmath54 in ( 17 ) to recover the power or root behaviour of the @xmath2 function , that is to find out the coefficients @xmath64 in the @xmath54 series @xmath65 such that @xmath66 our numerical results indicate that the biggest coefficient in ( 26 ) is @xmath67 .
figure 3 shows the behaviour of the correlation function @xmath68 for various values of the @xmath69 and @xmath70 . again
the function @xmath68 does not simply coincide with @xmath71
finally we should stress that the curvature representation is very helpful in establishing global properties of the action and hence of the partition function and the loop green functions @xcite . | strong belief qcd equivalent to string theory important in development theory strong interactions solution two - dimensional qcd in strings invoked ultimate conjecture qcd equivalent to string theory @xmath1 string folding surface extrinsic curvature recent articles authors suggested geometrical string extends feynman integral over paths to integral over surfaces theory surface degenerates into single particle world line amplitude proportional to length world line approach motivated motion particle internal structure described by action proportional to length spacetime path principle continuity principle define action theory @xmath0 for smooth surfaces action proportional to mean extrinsic curvature folding surface degree suppression depends on gonimetric factor @xmath2 arbitrary @xmath2 grow fast near dihedral angles close to @xmath3 flat surfaces subsequent publication authors found action @xmath0 equivalent representation total curvature @xmath4 of polygons @xmath5 in intersection plane @xmath6 with surface @xmath7 curvature @xmath4 integrated over all planes @xmath6 intersecting surface @xmath7 representation proven for special case action @xmath0 depends linearly on dihedral angle @xmath8rigidity polygons @xmath9 suppression folding surface important generalization curvature representation dependence dihedral angle @xmath8 arbitrary aim article numerical analyses curvature gonihedric action dependence dihedral angle arbitrary gonihedric string formulated euclidean space @xmath10 feynman integral coincides partition function randomly fluctuating surfaces continuum euclidean space @xmath10 random surface associated connected polyhedral surface @xmath7 vertex coordinates @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 number vertices action defined @xcite @xmath14 gonimetric factor @xmath2 defined @xmath15 @xmath16 summation edges @xmath17 @xmath7 @xmath18 dihedral angle between faces flat triangles @xmath7 @xmath10 common edge @xmath17 property ( 3 ) allows argument @xmath2 function interval @xmath19 computations measuring dihedral angle @xmath18 side surface less than @xmath3 action physical dimension length suppression folding surface depends @xmath2 @xmath2 equal @xmath20 @xmath21 suppression arbitrary physical properties model connection qcd discussed @xcite new representation action @xmath0 proven @xcite special case factor @xmath2 linear present article perform numerical analyses curvature representation dependence dihedral angle arbitrary numerical integration shows select dependence dihedral angle rigidity polygons @xmath23 suppression folding surfaces analytical results general case denote @xmath24 angle intersection plane @xmath6 dihedral angle @xmath18 edge @xmath17 total curvature @xmath4 polygon intersection equal sum @xcite @xmath25 imply @xmath24 equal @xmath3 edges @xmath17 not intersected plane @xmath6 gonihedric action @xmath0 equal @xcite @xmath26 @xmath27 invariant measure two - dimensional planes @xmath6 @xmath28 measure defined coordinates unit vector @xmath29 normal plane @xmath6 distance @xmath30 plane from origin prove representation 6 substitute ( 5 ) ( 7 ) into ( 6 ) yields @xcite @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 ( 9 ) averaging orientations plane @xmath6 equal to @xmath37 proven @xcite present new proof apply numerical integration complicated casesexpression for @xmath38 @xmath41 angle intersection plane @xmath6 with dihedral angle @xmath8 hard to integrate ( 9 ) ( 10 ) get ( 4 ) from ( 9 ) ( 10 ) @xmath42 @xmath43 all angles in interval @xmath19 property dihedral angle @xmath44 @xmath45 property @xmath46 follows from geometrical picture formula substituting ( 13 ) into ( 9 ) ( 12 ) @xmath47 last functional equation boundary condition ( 11 ) unique solution @xmath48 completes curvature representation ( 6 ) ( 5 ) @xmath0 case 4 extend result @xmath36 arbitrary function of @xmath37 @xmath49 extended curvature @xmath50 defined as @xmath51 function @xmath52 defined integration planes @xmath6 select appropriate function @xmath54 total curvature @xmath50 gonimetric factor @xmath2 with necessary properties ( 2 ) ( 3 ) important cases @xmath54 power of @xmath55 @xmath56 or root function @xmath57 compute two angle correlation function @xmath58 defined by integral @xmath59 impossible to compute explicitly use numerical integration study behaviourfigure 1 result integration planes @xmath60 ( 18 ) functions @xmath54 qualitative behaviour gonimetric function @xmath2 similar to @xmath54 function fig31 fig32 ask deformation of functions ( 19 ) ( 20 ) after integration @xmath60 18 ) magnitude differences @xmath61 or @xmath62 figure 2 differences not large equality excluded @xmath63 equality hold @xcite question select function @xmath54 in ( 17 ) recover root behaviour @xmath2 function find coefficients @xmath64 in @xmath54 series @xmath65 @xmath66 biggest coefficient in ( 26 ) is @xmath67 figure 3 behaviour correlation function @xmath68 for values @xmath69 and @xmath70 function @xmath68 coincide with @xmath71 curvature representation helpful establishing global properties action partition function loop green functions @xcite | 0.313158 | 2,175 | 1,166 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,292 | we show how the quark free energy can be determined from a string and the hadron resonance gas model with one heavy quark below the de - confinement phase transition .
we discuss the interesting problem of identification of degrees of freedom at increasing temperatures , as well as the relevance of string breaking and avoided crossings . | what is the maximum temperature where the bulk of qcd thermodynamics can be described in hadronic terms , with no explicit reference to the underlying quarks and gluons ? in this contribution
we analyze to what extent can one describe the qcd thermodynamics from the hadronic spectrum .
we thus hope to identify the nature of non - hadronic precursors of the crossover to the quark - gluon plasma in terms of low temperature partonic expansions @xcite ( see @xcite for a review ) .
the relation between spectrum and partition function provides the thermodynamic free energy @xmath0 @xmath1 the example of a hydrogen gas in qed illustrates the situation and motivates the discussion regarding the completeness of states which ultimately are interacting protons and electrons . at low temperatures , states are molecular , i.e. @xmath2 states which behave as compact and structureless .
when we heat up the system a rovibrational spectrum of states @xmath3 emerges and eventually the molecule is disociated into atoms @xmath4 . at higher temperatures ,
atoms are excited @xmath5 and eventually ionized into a plasma of @xmath6 and @xmath7 in the continuum where the @xmath6 and @xmath7 constituents becomes manifest .
clearly , neutral states ( atomic or molecular ) are not effectively complete at all temperatures and residual interactions corresponding to background non - resonant scattering become relevant @xcite .
in qcd on the lattice @xmath0 is determined by integrating the trace anomaly , @xmath8 with respect to the temperature and _ assuming _ a reference value , ideally @xmath9 with @xmath10 .
once this condition is imposed we expect that at sufficiently low temperatures all the observables are described in terms of hadronic degrees of freedom ; the quark - gluon underlying constituents are disclosed at very high temperatures .
this quark - hadron duality _ at low temperature _ has been confirmed by the most recent and accurate lattice calculations at finite temperature @xcite are confronted with the hadron resonance gas ( hrg ) , a rather simple system of non - interacting point - like and structureless hadrons @xmath11 here , the sum is over _ all _ hadronic states including spin - isospin and anti - particle degeneracies , @xmath12 for mesons and baryons respectively , @xmath13 is the energy and the cumulative number of states ( degeneracy included ) @xmath14 where @xmath15 are the hadron masses .
the spectrum can be taken either directly from the pdg @xcite or the relativized quark model ( rqm ) refs .
indeed , requiring @xmath16 ^ 2 \sim n_{\rm dat } \pm \sqrt{2 n_{\rm dat } } \ , , \label{eq : chi2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we get @xmath17 for @xmath18 lattice points @xcite both for pdg and rqm , showing that they can be used to saturate the hadronic spectrum for light quarks provided @xmath19 .
this rqm saturation will be assumed also to take place when heavy quarks are involved in which case the pdg lacks many of the needed states .
this of course suggests to determine _ directly _ @xmath20 from the @xmath21 data , as illustrated in fig .
[ fig : deut ] ( left panel ) .
the partition function and its comparison with hadronic states through the trace anomaly @xmath21 , displays explicitly the connection between spectrum and thermodynamics yielding the statistically significant identification of @xmath22 with @xmath23 using pdg or rqm where only @xmath24 and @xmath25 states contribute .
but , which hadronic states count into the calculation of the thermodynamic properties ? . as argued long ago @xcite , counting hadronic states implicitly averages over some scale , and so states such as the deuteron ( made of @xmath26 ) generate fluctuations in a smaller nuclear scale .
the cumulative number in a given channel @xmath27 with bound states @xmath28 below the threshold @xmath29 is in general ( see e.g. @xcite ) @xmath30 \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] which becomes @xmath31/\pi=0 $ ] due to levinson s theorem .
this fluctuation is shown in fig . [
fig : deut ] for the nn channel where @xmath32 , and the deuteron mass is @xmath33 ( @xmath34 ) .
thus , the deuteron does nt count .
this is a general feature of weakly bound states , which for the copious new x , y , z states , might affect the thermodynamics if the hrg was blindly identified with the pdg ( with _ all _ x , y , z s ) .
the linearly growing static energy of two @xmath35 and @xmath36 sources in the fundamental representation of the su(@xmath37)-group placed at a distance @xmath38 is often identified with confinement with a string tension @xmath39 . including the short distance ( perturbative ) coulomb - like behaviour yields the venerable cornell potential for the ground state @xmath40
actually , the mass of a @xmath41 state , becomes unstable at a critical distance @xmath42 when a light @xmath43 pair is created from the vacuum and the heavy - light meson - antimeson @xmath44 channel opens @xmath45 where the weak van der waals like meson exchange interaction in the @xmath46 sector is neglected proceeds as follows . due to spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking
the quarks acquire an additive _ dynamical _ mass @xmath47 contribution to the total mass @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the _ current _ mass . for light @xmath43-mesons @xmath50 whereas for light - heavy ( @xmath51 ) mesons @xmath52 and thus @xmath53 which yields @xmath54 in fair agreement with the lattice estimate @xcite . ] . we have a diabatic crossing structure which turns into an adiabatic avoided crossing when the transition strength @xmath55 is included . in general , one has excited meson states , @xmath56 where @xmath57 and in fig .
[ fig : isgur3 ] we show the resulting adiabatic spectrum based on the rqm @xcite when a mixing strength of @xmath58 is implemented .
much of our understanding of the qcd dynamics at finite temperature is linked to the helmholtz free energy defined as the maximum work the system can exchange at fixed temperature between two heavy @xmath59 at separation @xmath38 . in the confined phase , the correlator between polyakov loops becomes @xcite @xmath60 where , before mixing , one has the crossing among the energy levels up to @xmath61 pair creation . neglecting the avoided crossing , eq .
( [ eq : fave ] ) yields @xmath62 where @xmath63 .
we show in fig .
[ fig : flisgurmesons ] the heavy @xmath64 free energy obtained with eq .
( [ eq : fave2 ] ) by using the spectrum of heavy - light mesons with a charm ( bottom ) quark , and no strangeness , obtained with the isgur model of ref .
@xcite up to @xmath65gev .
we have considered @xmath66 and @xmath67 ( no fit ) . in fig .
[ fig : flisgurmesons ] we also show the polyakov loop computed as @xmath68 the agreement with lattice data is quite good for @xmath69 .
thus the spectrum both for the pdg and the rqm saturates the sum rules at these temperatures by a factor @xmath70 with @xmath71mev , we get good agreement with the lowest temperature lattice point .
this kind of ambiguity comes from renormalization effects . like
in @xcite we assume @xmath72 for @xmath73 .
the recent evaluation of ref .
@xcite , unlike @xcite is based on a different renormalization condition and @xmath74 for the free energy and the role of avoiding crossing will be analyzed elsewhere . ] whereas the finite temperature does not resolve avoided crossings making them effectively diabatic passages .
while much of the effort has been directed towards a description of the hadron - to - quark - gluon crossover , at present there is no understanding on the mechanism , perhaps because confinement itself is not really well understood .
our analysis of the free energy suggests that lowest temperatures where purely hadronic states account for qcd observables is rather large @xmath75 and close to the critical temperature .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l. salcedo , phys.rev.lett . 109 ( 2012 )
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l. salcedo , phys.rev .
d89 ( 2014 ) 076006 .
e. ruiz arriola , l. salcedo and e. megias , acta phys.polon .
b45 ( 2014 ) 2407 .
r. rajaraman , mesons in nuclei 3 ( 1979 ) . | maximum temperature where qcd thermodynamics described in hadronic terms no reference to quarks gluons ? contribution analyze qcd thermodynamics from hadronic spectrum hope identify non - hadronic precursors of crossover to quark - gluon plasma low temperature partonic expansions relation between spectrum partition function provides thermodynamic free energy example hydrogen gas in qed discussion completeness of states interacting protons electrons low temperatures states molecular compact structureless heat rovibrational spectrum of states emerges molecule disociated into atoms higher temperatures atoms excited ionized into plasma of @xmath6 @xmath7 constituents manifest neutral states not complete at all temperatures residual interactions background non - resonant scattering relevant in qcd lattice @xmath0 determined by integrating trace anomaly temperature reference value ideally @xmath9 with @xmath10 condition imposed at low temperatures observables described in hadronic degrees of freedom quark - gluon constituents disclosed at high temperaturesquark - hadron duality at low temperature confirmed by lattice calculations at finite temperature @xcite confronted with hadron resonance gas simple system of non - interacting structureless hadrons @xmath11 sum hadronic states including spin - isospin anti - particle degeneracies @xmath12 mesons baryons @xmath13 energy cumulative number of states degeneracy included @xmath14 hadron masses spectrum taken from pdg @xcite or relativized quark model rqm @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 lattice points @xcite pdg rqm saturate hadronic spectrum for light quarks @xmath19 rqm saturation when heavy quarks involved pdg lacks states determine @xmath20 from @xmath21 data in fig . partition function comparison with hadronic states trace anomaly displays connection between spectrum and thermodynamics identification of @xmath22 with @xmath23 using pdg or rqm only @xmath24 and @xmath25 states contribute which hadronic states count into thermodynamic properties ?argued @xcite hadronic states averages scale deuteron @xmath26 generate fluctuations smaller nuclear scale cumulative number channel @xmath27 bound states @xmath28 below threshold @xmath29 @xmath30 becomes @xmath31/ due to levinson s theorem fluctuation shown in fig . nn channel @xmath32 deuteron mass @xmath33 ( @xmath34 deuteron count general feature of weakly bound states affect thermodynamics hrg identified pdg growing static energy @xmath35 @xmath36 sources su(@xmath37)-group distance @xmath38 identified with confinement string tension @xmath39 short distance perturbative coulomb - behaviour yields cornell potential ground state @xmath40 mass @xmath41 state becomes unstable at critical distance @xmath42 light @xmath43 pair created from vacuum heavy - light meson - antimeson @xmath44 channel opens @xmath45 weak meson exchange interaction @xmath46 sector neglected chiral symmetry quarks acquire additive dynamical mass @xmath47 contribution to total mass @xmath48 @xmath49 current masslight @xmath43-mesons @xmath50 light - heavy @xmath51 mesons @xmath52 @xmath53 yields @xmath54 agreement lattice estimate @xcite diabatic crossing structure adiabatic avoided crossing transition strength @xmath55 included excited meson states @xmath56 @xmath57 fig adiabatic spectrum rqm @xcite mixing strength @xmath58 implemented understanding qcd dynamics finite temperature linked helmholtz free energy maximum work system exchange fixed temperature heavy @xmath59 separation @xmath38 confined phase correlator polyakov loops becomes @xcite @xmath60 mixing crossing energy levels @xmath61 pair creation avoided crossing eq . fave ] yields @xmath62 @xmath63 fig heavy @xmath64 free energy eq . : fave2 spectrum heavy - light mesons charm bottom quark no strangeness isgur model ref @xcite @xmath65gev considered @xmath66 @xmath67 no fit polyakov loop @xmath68 agreement lattice data @xmath69spectrum pdg rqm saturates sum rules temperatures factor @xmath70 @xmath71mev agreement lowest temperature lattice point ambiguity from renormalization effects assume @xmath72 for @xmath73 recent evaluation @xcite different renormalization condition @xmath74 free energy role avoiding crossing analyzed elsewhere finite temperature resolve avoided crossings diabatic passages effort hadron - to - quark - gluon crossover no understanding mechanism confinement not understood analysis free energy suggests lowest temperatures hadronic states account qcd observables large @xmath75 close to critical temperature megias ruiz arriola salcedo phys.rev.lett . 109 ( 2012 ) d89 ( 2014 ) 076006 acta phys.polon . b45 ( 2014 ) 2407 rajaraman mesons in nuclei 3 ( 1979 ) | 0.312553 | 2,004 | 1,032 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,300 | we investigate the importance of proton capture on low - lying excited states that are thermally excited in hot stellar enviroments .
in addition to the previously known case of @xmath0cl@xmath1ar we find several other sd - shell nuclei with large stellar enhancement factors . we discuss the uncertainty this introduces into rp - process nucleosynthesis . | the rapid proton capture ( rp process ) is a sequence of rapid proton capture reactions and @xmath2 decays passing through proton rich nuclei .
it is a dominant nucleosynthesis process in explosive hydrogen burning conditions @xcite .
reaction rates govern energy release and final isotopic abundances . rp
process rates are crucial for x ray burst models @xcite . some of the capture rates along rp
process are not determined experimentally .
but many rely on theoretical input .
previous predictions of reaction rates have generally assumed that all interacting nuclei are in the ground state @xcite .
schatz et al .
@xcite showed that the capture on the low - lying first - excited state of @xmath0cl was crucial for the @xmath0cl(p,@xmath3)@xmath4ar reaction rate .
the energies and spin in @xmath4ar were provided by experiment , but input for the proton and gamma decay widths come from theory .
the impact of the excited states in the target nuclei that are thermally populated in astrophysical plasma is expressed in terms of a `` stellar enhancement factor '' ( sef ) .
the sef for @xmath0cl was found to be around five for temperatures in the range 0.1 to 0.8 gk . in this paper
we investigate other sd - shell nuclei where low - lying excited states may lead to large sef .
in case of high level densities and high @xmath5 values ( q@xmath65 mev ) , reaction rates can be calculated by statistical models @xcite . for nuclei close to proton drip line @xmath5 values of ( p,@xmath3 )
reactions drop strongly , the compound nuclei are produced at low densities @xcite .
proton capture reaction rates for low level densities in the compound nucleus are determined by contributions of direct capture and single resonances correlated with unbound states in the compound nucleus .
nonresonant cross section is expressed in terms of the astrophysical @xmath7factor , which contains the nuclear component of the transition probability to the ground states and low excited states of final nuclei .
@xmath7factors are calculated using radcap code @xcite , which uses a woods saxon nuclear potential ( central + spin orbit ) and a coulomb potential of a uniform charge distribution .
the nuclear potential parameters are chosen to reproduce the bound state energies
. direct proton capture rate on the target nucleus in state @xmath8 is given by @xmath9de } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where b , which arises from the barrier penetrability , is given by @xmath10 here @xmath11 is reduced mass in entrance channel in amu , @xmath12 is the boltzmann constant , @xmath13 is a charge number of target nucleus , and @xmath14 is proton energy .
@xmath15 is the sum of the individual @xmath7factors of the transitions from the initial state @xmath8 into all bound states in the final nucleus . for a given stellar temperature @xmath16 ,
nuclear reactions take place in relatively narrow energy window around the effective burning energy @xmath17 .
the @xmath7factor is nearly a constant over gamov window @xmath18 , where @xmath19 and @xmath20 hence , the capture rate @xmath21 is usually approximated by a constant @xmath7factor .
resonance decay widths depend on the coulomb barrier , the orbital momentum barrier and partial widths of the compound state .
the resonant reaction rate for capture on a nucleus in an initial state @xmath8 , @xmath22 for isolated narrow resonances is calculated as a sum over all relevant compound nucleus states @xmath23 above the proton threshold @xcite : @xmath24 here @xmath25 is the temperature in @xmath26 , @xmath27 is the resonance energy in the center of mass system , the resonance strengths in @xmath28 for proton capture are @xmath29 @xmath30 is a total width of the resonance level and @xmath31 and @xmath32 are target and projectile spins .
proton decay width depends exponentially on the resonance energy and can be calculated from proton spectroscopic factor @xmath33 and the single particle proton width @xmath34 as @xmath35 .
the single particle proton widths were calculated from @xmath36 @xcite with @xmath37 and where the channel radius @xmath38 was chosen to match the width obtained from an exact evaluation of the proton scattering cross section from a woods - saxon potential well for @xmath39 , @xmath40 mev .
this simple model matches exact calculations in the sd - shell t within about 10% , and has advantage that it is fast and can be easily extrapolated to energies below 0.1 mev where the scattering calculation becomes computationally difficult .
we use a coulomb penetration code from barker @xcite .
the proton spectroscopic factors and the gamma widths are obtained with the usd interaction @xcite in the full sd - shell model space .
the gamma decay widths were obtained with b(m1 ) values based on free - nucleon g - factors and b(e2 ) values with harmonic oscillator radial wave functions and effective charges of @xmath41 and @xmath42 @xcite .
the uncertainty of the spectroscopic factors and gamma decay widths is on the order of 20@xmath43 . as we will emphasize
the largest uncertainty for the present work is the precise location of the resonances near the proton decay thresholds .
the total reaction rate is the sum of the capture rate on all thermally excited states in the target nucleus weighted with their individual population factors : @xmath44 here @xmath45 and @xmath46 are the resonance energies .
dccdcdc e_x ( mev ) & @xmath47 & @xmath48 & c^2s & @xmath49 & c^2s^ * & @xmath50 + 0 & @xmath51 & 2s@xmath52 & 0.080 & 6.58e-3 7.00e-3 & & + & & 1d@xmath53 & 0.672 & 3.78e-3 4.43e-3 & 1.127 & 4.15e-3 5.32e-3 + & & 1d@xmath54 & & & 0.001 & 4.09e-6 6.38e-6 + 1.359 & @xmath55 & 2s@xmath52 & 0.001 & 8.65e-5 9.63e-5 & 0.006 & 5.76e-4
6.19e-4 + & & 1d@xmath53 & 0.185 & 1.54e-3 1.82e-3 & 0.119 & 6.35e-4
8.17e-4 + & & 1d@xmath54 & 0.004 & 5.74e-5 7.76e-5 & 0.009 & 7.73e-5 1.20e-4 + 1.798 & @xmath56 & 2s@xmath52 & & & 0.002 & 2.42e-4 2.69e-4 + & & 1d@xmath53 & 0.145 & 1.60e-3 1.91e-3 & 0.620 & 4.33e-3 5.60e-3
+ & & 1d@xmath54 & 0.006 & 1.07e-4 1.46e-4 & 0.021 & 2.25e-4 3.49e-4 + 2.439 & @xmath55 & 2s@xmath52 & 0.031 & 3.68e-3 5.20e-3 & 0.024 & 1.83e-3 2.36e-3
+ & & 1d@xmath53 & 0.167 & 9.65e-4 1.18e-3 & 0.128 & 4.68e-4
6.18e-4 + & & 1d@xmath54 & 0.014 & 1.19e-4 1.66e-4 & 0.016 & 8.99e-5
1.42e-4 + 3.154 & @xmath55 & 2s@xmath52 & 0.068 & 6.92e-3 1.53e-2 & 0.001 & 4.01e-5 7.36e-5 + & & 1d@xmath53 & 0.516 & 1.92e-3 2.67e-3 & 0.169 & 4.11e-4
5.91e-4 + & & 1d@xmath54 & 0.003 & 1.55e-5 2.40e-5 & & + & & & & 2.95e-2 3.74e-2 & & 1.37e-2 1.63e-2 + [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] @xmath57p is also an odd - odd nucleus , @xmath58 .
the first excited state of @xmath57p , spin @xmath59 , is at 105.64 kev .
spin of the ground state is @xmath60 .
the second excited state is at 877 kev and spin @xmath61 is assigned from usd shell model prediction .
usd shell model gives energies of 142 kev and 840 kev .
proton separation energy of @xmath62s is 3.290 mev . as seen from fig .
[ 34res ] and fig .
[ fig3 ] , @xmath57p(p,@xmath3)@xmath62s reaction rate is dominated by fourth @xmath56 state resonance at 3.817 mev ( usd shell model energy prediction ) .
proton capture on a ground state and first excited state of @xmath57p is equally important .
[ fig3 ] shows the sef of about 20 around 0.8 gk due to first excited state .
this comes from the final state ( 11,5/2@xmath63,4 ) at 3.817 mev in @xmath62s .
it is connected to the @xmath64 excited state with a relatively strong @xmath65 spectroscopic factor .
there are no known excited states in @xmath62s , but in the mirror nucleus @xmath62al , the fourth 5/2@xmath63 state at 3.641 mev is in reasonable agreement with the theoretical energy .
the analogue energy of this state in @xmath62s should be within 100 kev of 3.64 mev , but this is enough to give an order of magnitude change in the rp - process reaction rate around 0.8 gk .
reaction rate at relevant temperature range @xmath66 gk agrees well with statistical model @xcite , however for higher stellar temperatures up to 10 gk direct capture starts to dominate reaction rate and total reaction rate exceeds statistical model prediction .
results for @xmath57p@xmath67s .
the middle panel shows the rp - reaction rate for the @xmath57p @xmath68 ground state ( dashed line ) and the sum of the contributions from the ground and the @xmath64 excited state at 0.106 mev ( full line ) .
see caption to fig .
[ fig1 ] for other details.,width=302 ]
although very few @xmath69 shell nuclei have low lying excited states , contributing significantly to total rates , proton capture on a first excited state can not be neglected .
in addition to the previously studied case of @xmath0cl@xmath1ar , we find at least two other cases @xmath57p@xmath70s and @xmath71cl@xmath72ar for which the low - lying excited state in initial nucleus dominates the cross section .
unfortunately , the excited states are not known for these cases .
initial states above about 300 kev are not important unless there is a particularly strong spectroscopic factor that connects to low - lying final states in the daughter .
direct capture rates depend on astrophysical s factor , which changes slightly with temperature at temperatures relevant to rp
process for x ray bursts , @xmath73 gk , and may have resonances for higher temperatures .
therefore knowing at what energies resonances exist is important for quality of such reaction rate predictions and so for isotopic abundances and energy release .
an important task for the near future is to quantify the errors associated with these and other cases where the energies and spectroscopic factors are not known experimentally and must be taken from theory .
recent efforts have been me to establish improved hamiltonians for the sd - shell .
calculation of the corss section with several realistic hamiltonians will help to establish theoretical error bands for important cross sections . | rapid proton capture reactions decays proton rich nuclei dominant nucleosynthesis in explosive hydrogen burning reaction rates govern energy release final isotopic abundances rates crucial for x ray burst models capture rates not rely on theoretical input predictions interacting nuclei in ground state capture on low - lying first - excited state of @xmath0cl crucial for reaction rate energies spin in provided by experiment proton gamma decay widths from theory impact of excited states in nuclei expressed stellar enhancement factor sef for @xmath0cl around five for temperatures 0.1 to 0.8 gk other sd - shell nuclei where low - lying excited states lead to large sef high level densities high @xmath5 values reaction rates calculated by statistical models nuclei close to proton drip line values reactions drop compound nuclei produced at low densities proton capture reaction rates for low level densities determined by direct capture single resonances with unbound statesnonresonant cross section astrophysical @xmath7factor nuclear transition probability ground low excited states final nuclei calculated using radcap code @xcite woods saxon nuclear potential coulomb potential uniform charge distribution nuclear potential parameters reproduce bound state energies proton capture rate target nucleus @xmath8 given @xmath9de barrier penetrability @xmath10 @xmath11 reduced mass entrance channel boltzmann constant charge number nucleus proton energy @xmath15 sum @xmath7factors transitions initial state @xmath8 bound states final nucleus stellar temperature @xmath16 nuclear reactions narrow energy window effective burning energy @xmath17 @xmath7factor constant over gamov window @xmath18 capture rate @xmath21 approximated constant @xmath7factor resonance decay widths depend coulomb barrier orbital momentum barrier partial widths compound stateresonant reaction rate nucleus initial state narrow resonances calculated sum nucleus states above proton threshold temperature resonance energy center mass system resonance strengths proton capture total width resonance level target projectile spins proton decay width depends resonance energy calculated from proton spectroscopic factor single particle proton width single particle proton widths calculated from @xmath36 @xcite @xmath37 channel radius @xmath38 width proton scattering cross section woods - saxon potential well @xmath39 mev model matches calculations sd - shell t 10% fast extrapolated energies below 0.1 mev coulomb penetration code barker proton spectroscopic factors gamma widths obtained usd interaction @xcite full sd - shell model space gamma decay widths obtained b(m1 ) values free - nucleon g - factors b(e2 ) values harmonic oscillator radial wave functions effective charges @xmath41 @xmath42 @xcite uncertainty spectroscopic factors gamma decay widths 20@xmath43uncertainty precise location resonances near proton decay thresholds total reaction rate is sum capture rate thermally excited states target nucleus weighted population factors @xmath44 @xmath45 are resonance energies_x @xmath47 @xmath48 c^2s @xmath49 c^2s @xmath50 @xmath51@xmath52 0.080 6.58e-3 7.00e-3@xmath53 0.3.78e-3 4.43e-3 1.127 4.15e-3 5.32e-3@xmath54 4.09e-6 6.38e-6 1.359 8.65e-5 9.63e-5 5.76e-4 6.19e-4@xmath53 0.185 1.54e-3 1.82e-3 6.35e-4 8.17e-4@xmath54 5.74e-5 7.76e-5 7.73e-5 1.20e-4@xmath52 2.42e-4 2.69e-4@xmath53 0.145 1.60e-3 1.91e-3 4.33e-3 5.60e-3@xmath54 1.07e-4 1.46e-4 2.25e-4 3.49e-4 2.439 3.68e-3 5.20e-3 1.83e-3 2.36e-3@xmath53 0.167 9.65e-4 1.18e-3 4.68e-4 6.18e-4@xmath54 1.19e-4 1.66e-4 8.99e-5 1.42e-4 6.92e-3 1.53e-2 4.01e-5 7.36e-5@xmath53 0.516 1.92e-3 2.67e-3 0.169 4.11e-4 5.91e-4@xmath54 1.55e-5 2.40e-5 2.95e-2 3.74e-2 1.37e-2 1.63e-2 @xmath57p odd nucle@xmath58 first state @xmath57p @xmath59 105.64 kev ground state @xmath60 second 877 kev @xmath61 usd shell model prediction 142 kev 840 kev proton separation energy @xmath62s 3.290 mev @xmath57p@xmath62s reaction rate dominated fourth @xmath56 state resonance 3.817 mev proton capture ground state first excited state @xmath57p important sef 0.8 gk first excited state final state 11,5/2@xmath63,4 3.817 mev @xmath62s connected @xmath64 state strong @xmath65 spectroscopic factor no known excited states @xmath62s mirror nucleus @xmath62al fourth 5/2@xmath63 state 3.641 mev theoretical energy analogue energy @xmath62s within 100 kev 3.64 mev change rp - process reaction rate 0.8 gk reaction rate temperature @xmath66 agrees statistical model @xcite higher stellar temperatures gk direct capture exceeds statistical model prediction results @xmath57p@xmath67smiddle panel shows rp - reaction rate @xmath57p @xmath68 ground state contributions ground @xmath64 excited state at 0.106 mev see caption fig for details few @xmath69 shell nuclei have low lying excited states rates proton capture on first excited state neglected @xmath0cl@xmath1ar two other cases @xmath57p @xmath71cl@xmath72ar low - lying excited state dominates cross section excited states not known initial states above 300 kev not important unless strong spectroscopic factor low - lying final states direct capture rates depend on astrophysical s factor changes with temperature resonances higher temperatures knowing resonances important for reaction rate predictions isotopic abundances energy release task quantify errors these cases energies spectroscopic factors not known theory efforts establish improved hamiltonians for sd - shell calculation corss section with realistic hamiltonians establish theoretical error bands for cross sections | 0.426816 | 2,920 | 1,529 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,305 | neutron spin - flip scattering observations of a resonance in the superconducting state is often taken as evidence of an unconventional superconducting state in which the gap changes sign @xmath0 for momentum transfers @xmath1 which play an important role in the pairing .
recently questions regarding this identification for the fe - pnictide superconductors have been raised and it has been suggested that @xmath2 .
here we propose that inelastic neutron or x - ray scattering measurements of the spectral weight of a phonon of momentum @xmath1 can distinguish between these two pairing scenarios .
determining the superconducting gap structure in the fe - based superconductors has proven difficult due to the complicated multisheeted , multiorbital nature of the fermi surface , as well as problems with fabricating clean films and interfaces . at present the most popular candidate for pairing in most of these materials is the @xmath3 state which changes sign between hole and electron pockets and arises naturally from a spin - fluctuation interaction@xcite .
however , there are few phase - sensitive tests of the relative sign change of @xmath4 between the different fermi surfaces .
josephson tunneling experiments @xcite , fourier transform stm in a magnetic field @xcite , and the observation of a resonance mode in inelastic neutron scattering experiments@xcite have been offered as limited evidence for such a sign change .
recently , an electron - phonon interaction enhanced by orbital fluctuations has been proposed as the mechanism which is responsible for pairing in the fe - based superconductors @xcite .
this interaction leads to a so - called @xmath5 gap which is positive on both the hole and electron fermi surfaces . while in both cases
, the gap can be anisotropic and accidental nodes can even occur , the relative sign of the gap on regions of the hole and electron fermi surfaces which have the same dominant orbital weight will be negative if the pairing is driven by spin - fluctuations and positive if driven by phonon - orbital - fluctuations .
thus it is important to determine the relative sign between @xmath6 and @xmath7 on the hole and electron fermi surfaces , respectively , for momentum transfers @xmath1 which connect such regions .
one test of this is the occurrence of a spin resonance peak in the neutron spin - flip scattering in the superconducting state @xcite .
the bcs coherence factor which enters the spin - flip scattering is @xmath8 here @xmath9 is the quasi - particle energy and near threshold , where @xmath10 goes to zero , this coherence factor goes to 1 if @xmath7 and @xmath6 have opposite signs and zero if they have the same sign .
a resonance peak is expected in the former case @xcite .
however , arguments @xcite have been given that for the case of bafe@xmath11co@xmath12as@xmath13 the experimentally observed peak @xcite may be consistent with an @xmath5 gap , if the scattering rate collapses sufficiently rapidly in the superconducting state .
thus one would like to find additional experimental probes which provide a way of determining the relative sign of the gap between the hole and electron pockets .
as is known , there exist anomalies in the phonon spectral weight of conventional superconductors .
various authors @xcite have shown that if the phonon frequency @xmath14 is greater than twice the gap @xmath15 , but not too far above , significant spectral weight is transferred below @xmath16 into a resonance .
in addition , the phonon peak shifts to higher frequencies and broadens .
these effects have been convincingly observed in neutron scattering experiments on the borocarbide superconductor yni@xmath13b@xmath13c @xcite .
this behavior reflects the fact that in the superconducting state , the coherence factor that enters the coupling of a phonon to electron polarization fluctuations is similar to eq .
( [ eq:1 ] ) except that it has a plus sign . in this case
the coherence factor will go to 1 at threshold if @xmath7 and @xmath6 have the same sign .
this will lead to an anomalous resonance and hardening of the phonon peak for an @xmath5 gap . here
we point out that for an @xmath3 gap with @xmath17 , the anomalous resonance is absent and the phonon peak shifts down ( softens ) slightly .
thus neutron and x - ray scattering @xcite measurements of the phonon spectral weight at specific @xmath1 values can provide information on the relative sign of the gap @xcite . to explore the use of this effect to determine the relative gap signs in the fe - based materials
, we will use the same 5-orbital tight binding fit of the lda bandstructure that we previously used to discuss the possible occurrence of a neutron scattering spin resonance @xcite . in this case , with an electron doping @xmath18 one finds the fermi surfaces and orbital occupations illustrated in fig .
[ fig:1 ] .
here there are two hole fermi surfaces @xmath19 and @xmath20 around the @xmath21 point and two electron fermi surfaces @xmath22 and @xmath23 around the @xmath24 and @xmath25 points of the unfolded ( 1fe / cell ) brillouin zone .
we will use an orbital notation @xmath26 to denote the @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 orbits , respectively , where the axes are along the fe - fe bonds .
the dominant orbital weight of the bloch states on the fermi surfaces is indicated in fig .
[ fig:1 ] .
[ htbp ] , green=@xmath28 , blue=@xmath29 ) . here
@xmath32 connects @xmath27 parts of the hole @xmath20 and @xmath28 parts of the electron @xmath22 fermi surfaces and @xmath33 connects @xmath27 parts of @xmath19 to the @xmath29 parts of @xmath22 .
[ fig:1],title="fig:",width=264 ] as kontani and onari @xcite have noted , local fe - ion displacements couple to orbital fluctuations . the polarization susceptibility associated with these orbital fluctuations enters the phonon self - energy and is reflected in the phonon spectral weight .
here we examine the change in the phonon spectral weight @xmath34 associated with the @xmath35 and @xmath36 momenta shown in fig .
[ fig:1 ] when the system goes from a normal state to a superconducting state with a nominal @xmath5 gap or an @xmath3 gap .
we begin with @xmath32 and will assume that there is an electron - phonon coupling @xmath37 for scattering an electron between the dominantly @xmath27-like states on the @xmath20 hole fermi surface to the @xmath28-like states on the @xmath22 electron fermi surfaces . in the following , the real part of the normal state phonon self - energy will be absorbed to give the dressed normal state phonon frequency @xmath38 .
then at low energies , the imaginary part of the phonon self - energy for momentum @xmath32 dominantly comes from scattering between the nearly nested @xmath27-like states on @xmath20 and the @xmath28-like states on @xmath22 .
similarly , the change between the superconducting and normal state phonon self - energy is also determined by the @xmath27@xmath28 orbital fluctuations . in this case
the important orbital contribution to the phonon self - energy is @xmath39 with @xmath40^{-1}\right\}_{1212 } \label{eq:3}\ ] ] and similarly for @xmath41 . here
the coulomb interaction matrix is @xmath42 and @xmath43 the notation follows ref .
@xcite with @xmath44 and @xmath45 the intra- and inter - orbital coulomb interactions , @xmath46 the exchange coupling and @xmath47 the pair hopping interactions .
we will consider a typically rotationally invariant set of interaction parameters which are similar to those previously used to study the occurrence of a spin resonance in the @xmath3 superconducting state @xcite .
these are such that @xmath48 in units of the hopping @xmath49 , @xmath50 , @xmath51 , and @xmath52 @xcite . in the superconducting state the normal and anomalous gorkov green s functions are given as @xmath53 with @xmath54 .
for the normal state calculations , the gap is set to zero in eq .
( [ eq:5 ] ) . here , because we are calculating the orbital - fluctuations , the sign between the normal and anomalous green s function products in eq .
( [ eq:5 ] ) is negative
. it would be positive if we were studying the spin susceptibility and in addition the orbital interaction matrix @xmath55 would be changed to @xmath56 . in eq .
( [ eq:5 ] ) we use a notation in which @xmath57 and @xmath58 . the calculations were carried out for a low temperature @xmath59 in units of @xmath60 .
[ htbp ] versus @xmath61 for the normal state ( red , solid ) , the @xmath5 superconducting state with @xmath62 ( blue , dashed ) and the @xmath3 state with @xmath63 ( green , dot - dashed ) .
[ fig:2],title="fig:",width=302 ] figure [ fig:2 ] shows the imaginary part of @xmath64 versus @xmath61 with @xmath65 for the normal state ( solid ) , the superconducting states with an @xmath66 gap ( dashed ) and an @xmath67 gap ( dash - dot ) @xcite .
the imaginary part of the orbital response is similar to what was found for the spin susceptibility with the @xmath3 and @xmath5 gaps interchanged .
thus , if the phonon - orbital - fluctuations provide the dominant pairing interaction in the fe - based superconductors then the gap will have @xmath5 character and one will find an anomalous resonance in the orbital susceptibility in the superconducting state rather than in the spin susceptibility . although it would be interesting to have a direct scattering probe of the orbital susceptibility spectral weight shown in fig .
[ fig:2 ] , one can still access its structure by measuring the phonon spectral weight . using the orbital susceptibility , we can evaluate the phonon self - energies that enter the normal and superconducting phonon progagators @xcite , @xmath68 and @xmath69 here @xmath70 and @xmath71 and @xmath72 are the superconducting and normal phonon self - energies obtained from eq .
( [ eq:2 ] ) , with the gap set to zero in eq .
( [ eq:5 ] ) for the normal case and set to @xmath73 and @xmath74 for the @xmath5 and @xmath3 superconducting states , respectively .
[ htbp ] versus @xmath61 for the normal state ( red , solid ) , the @xmath5 ( blue , dashed ) and @xmath3 ( green , dot - dashed ) superconducting gaps .
( b ) the real part @xmath75 ( see text ) for the @xmath5 ( red , solid ) and @xmath3 ( blue , dashed ) superconducting gaps .
[ fig:3],title="fig:",width=302 ] the phonon damping @xmath76 versus @xmath77 is plotted in fig .
[ fig:3]a .
here we have taken @xmath78 and set @xmath79 . as @xmath38 approaches @xmath80 ,
the effects we are discussing are enhanced and diminish when @xmath81 becomes large compared with @xmath80 . as seen in fig .
[ fig:3]a , for an @xmath5 gap there is an enhanced phonon damping above @xmath80 .
this arises from the increase in the density of states in this region due to the opening of the superconducting gap .
this enhancement also depends upon the coherence factor and as seen for the @xmath3 case , if the coherence factor vanishes , the onset of the damping rises slowly as @xmath61 exceeds @xmath80 and is smaller than in the normal state . in fig .
[ fig:3]b , we have plotted the difference between the real part of the phonon self - energy in the superconducting and the normal states asociated with the @xmath82@xmath83 scattering processes .
the @xmath5 case shows the familiar hardening of the phonon that occurs when @xmath38 exceeds @xmath80 .
that is , in the @xmath5 superconducting state , @xmath84 is positive for @xmath85 .
as we will see when we look at the phonon spectral weight , the negative dip for @xmath86 leads to what allen et al.@xcite have called a vibrational / superelectronic " resonance .
the structure of @xmath84 is quite difference in the @xmath3 state . here for @xmath85 , @xmath87 is negative and this leads to a softening of the @xmath38 phonon .
in addition , there will not be a resonance feature below @xmath80 in the phonon spectral weight . using the results for the self - energy shown in fig .
[ fig:3 ] , we have plotted the phonon spectral weight @xmath88 versus @xmath77 in fig . [ fig:4]a .
the solid line shows the result for the normal state while the long dashed and the dash - dot curves are for the superconducting @xmath5 and @xmath3 states , respectively .
here one sees that for an @xmath5 gap there is the expected resonance just below @xmath80 and the phonon peak has shifted up in frequency and broadened . for the @xmath3 gap ,
the anomalous resonance below @xmath80 is absent and the phonon peak has slightly softened as well as narrowed .
similar results for the @xmath33 phonon spectral weight are shown in fig .
[ fig:4]b .
[ htbp ] versus @xmath77 for wavevectors ( a ) @xmath32 and ( b ) @xmath33 for the normal state ( red , solid ) , the @xmath5 ( blue , dashed ) and @xmath3 ( green , dot - dashed ) superconducting gaps .
note that we have added a finite damping in the calculation of the orbital susceptibility @xmath89 .
[ fig:4],title="fig:",width=321 ] in rpa calculations @xcite there were parameter ranges in which the @xmath3-like gap was found to have nodes on the @xmath90 fermi surfaces . in this case , the nominally @xmath3 gap will have the same sign on the parts of the fermi surfaces connected by @xmath33 .
however , they would differ for @xmath32 .
thus , it will be important to measure the phonon spectral weight for various near nesting @xmath1 values .
however , one will need phonon modes that couple to the relevant orbital scattering and in addition have frequencies @xmath81 of order the sum of the magnitudes of the superconducting gaps @xmath91 associated with the nearby nested regions . in principle , with sufficient @xmath92 and @xmath61 resolution and sensitivity , neutron and x - ray scattering offer the possibility of mapping out the relative structure of the gap between various parts of the fermi surfaces in fe - based as well as other unconventional superconductors . | we would like to acknowledge useful discussions with t. devereaux and a.f .
ph and djs would like to thank the stanford institute for materials and energy sciences for their hospitality . tam and djs would like to acknowledge support from the center for nanophase materials sciences , which is sponsored at oak ridge national laboratory by the office of basic energy sciences , u.s .
department of energy .
this work was supported by doe de - fg02 - 05er46236 ( pjh ) , the dfg through trr80 and the free state of bavaria through the bacatec program ( sg ) . | acknowledge discussions devereaux a.f thank stanford institute materials energy sciences hospitality acknowledge support center for nanophase materials sciences sponsored oak ridge national laboratory office basic energy sciences u.s department energy work supported by doe de - fg02 - 05er46236 dfg trr80 free state bavaria bacatec program | 0.068134 | 130 | 66 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,306 | starting from elementary concepts , muon - beam cooling is defined , and the techniques by which it can be accomplished introduced and briefly discussed . | high - energy muon beams have been proposed as uniquely powerful and incisive sources for neutrino scattering and oscillation studies .
they may also enable energy - frontier lepton - antilepton colliders and may have unique advantages for studying the physics of electroweak symmetry breaking . the production of high - energy muon beams at the intensities needed for these applications will require muon - beam cooling @xcite .
to accelerate a secondary or tertiary beam it is desirable first to decrease its size so that a reasonable fraction of the produced particles will fit inside the apertures of the beamline .
it is well known that a focusing element ( _ e.g. _ a pair of quadrupole magnets with opposed field gradients ) can decrease the area of a charged - particle beam while increasing its spread in transverse momentum and , consequently , its divergence .
this relationship is an example of liouville s theorem : conservative forces can not increase or decrease the volume occupied by a beam in six - dimensional phase space @xcite .
focusing alone does not suffice for efficient acceleration of a secondary or tertiary beam , since the resulting increase in divergence means the beam will exceed some other aperture further downstream .
what is needed instead is a process by which _ both _ the beam size and divergence can be reduced . by analogy with refrigeration , which decreases the random relative motions of the molecules of a gas ,
this is known as beam _
cooling_. it is convenient to represent the volume of phase space occupied by a beam by the beam s _ emittance_.
the emittance in a given coordinate can be expressed as @xmath0 where @xmath1 designates root - mean - square , @xmath2 , and the factor @xmath3 is introduced so as to express emittance in units of length ( @xmath4 is the mass of the beam particle and @xmath5 the speed of light ) . neglecting possible correlations among the coordinates and momenta @xcite
, we then have @xmath6 for the six - dimensional emittance .
the subscript @xmath7 distinguishes these _ normalized _ emittances from the frequently used _
unnormalized _ emittance @xmath8 where @xmath9 and @xmath10 are the usual relativistic factors . in terms of ( unnormalized ) emittance , the transverse beam sizes are given by @xmath11 where @xmath12 are the transverse amplitude functions of the focusing lattice in the @xmath13 and @xmath14 directions , which characterize the focusing strength along the lattice ( low @xmath15 corresponds to strong focusing in the @xmath16th direction ) . since liouville s theorem tells us that normalized emittance is a constant of the motion , beam cooling requires a violation " of liouville s theorem .
this is possible by means of dissipative forces such as ionization energy loss @xcite , as described in more detail below .
cooling of the transverse phase - space coordinates of a muon beam can be accomplished by passing the beam through energy - absorbing material and accelerating structures , both embedded within a focusing magnetic lattice ; this is known as ionization cooling @xcite .
other cooling techniques ( electron , stochastic , and laser cooling ) are far too slow to yield a significant degree of phase - space compression within the muon lifetime @xcite .
ionization of the absorbing material by the muons decreases the muon momentum while ( to first order ) not affecting the beam size ; by eq . [ eq : eps - n ] , this constitutes cooling . at the same time
, multiple coulomb scattering of the muons in the absorber increases the beam divergence , heating the beam . differentiating eq .
[ eq : eps - n ] with respect to path length , we find that the rate of change of normalized transverse emittance within the absorber is given approximately by @xcite @xmath17 where angle brackets denote mean value , muon energy @xmath18 is in gev , @xmath19 is evaluated at the location of the absorber , and @xmath20 is the radiation length of the absorber medium @xcite .
( this is the expression appropriate to the cylindrically - symmetric case of solenoidal focusing , where @xmath21 . ) the first term in eq .
[ eq : cool ] is the cooling term and the second is the heating term . to minimize the heating term , which is proportional to the @xmath10 function and inversely proportional to radiation length , it has been proposed @xcite to use hydrogen as the energy - absorbing medium , giving @xmath22mev / m and @xmath23 m @xcite , with superconducting - solenoid focusing to give small @xmath24 cm @xcite .
key issues in absorber r&d include coping with the large heat deposition by the intense ( @xmath25s ) @xcite muon beam and minimizing scattering in absorber - vessel windows @xcite .
an additional technical requirement is high - gradient reacceleration of the muons between absorbers to replace the lost energy , so that the ionization - cooling process can be repeated many times . even though it is the absorbers that actually cool the beam , for typical radio - frequency ( rf ) accelerating - cavity gradients ( @xmath26mev / m ) , it is the rf cavities that dominate the length of the cooling channel ( see _ e.g. _ fig .
[ fig : sfofo ] ) , and the achievable rf gradient determines how much cooling is practical before an appreciable fraction of the muons have decayed .
we see from eq .
[ eq : cool ] that the percentage decrease in normalized emittance is proportional to the percentage energy loss , thus cooling in one transverse dimension by a factor 1/@xmath27 requires @xmath28100% energy loss and replacement .
the expense of rf power favors low beam energy for cost - effective reacceleration , as do also the increase of @xmath29 and the decreased width of the @xmath30 distribution at low momentum @xcite , and most muon - cooling simulations to date have used @xmath31mev/@xmath5 .
we are pursuing r&d on high - gradient normal - conducting rf cavities suitable for insertion into a solenoidal - focusing lattice @xcite .
transverse ionization cooling causes the longitudinal emittance @xmath32 to grow .
several effects contribute to this growth : fluctuations in energy loss in the absorbers ( energy - loss straggling , or the landau tail " ) cause growth in the energy spread of the beam , as does the negative slope of the @xmath29 momentum dependence in the beam - momentum regime ( below the ionization minimum ) that we are considering @xcite .
moreover , these low - momentum , large - divergence beams have a considerable spread in propagation velocity through the cooling lattice , causing bunch lengthening .
these effects result in gradual loss of particles out of the rf bucket .
they could be alleviated by longitudinal cooling .
longitudinal ionization cooling is possible in principle , but it appears to be impractical @xcite .
its realization would call for operation _ above _ the ionization minimum , where the @xmath29 slope with momentum is positive @xcite , but that slope is small and the resulting weak cooling effect is overcome by energy - loss straggling .
instead what is envisioned is emittance _ exchange _ between the longitudinal and transverse degrees of freedom , decreasing the longitudinal emittance while at the same time increasing the transverse .
conceptually , such emittance exchange can be accomplished by placing a suitably shaped absorber in a lattice location where there is dispersion , _
i.e. _ , using a bending magnetic field to spread the muons out in space according to their momenta , and shaping the absorber so as to absorb more energy from the higher - momentum muons and less from the lower - momentum ones .
( one can see that this is emittance _ exchange _ rather than longitudinal cooling _
per se _ , since to the extent that the muon momentum spread has been reduced by the shaped absorber , the beam can no longer be reconverged to a small spot by a subsequent bend . )
this is followed by transverse ionization cooling , the combined process being effectively equivalent to longitudinal cooling @xcite .
a variety of focusing - lattice designs for transverse muon cooling have been studied , most using solenoids as focusing elements . especially for the large ( @xmath33 m ) aperture required at the beginning of a muon cooling channel , stronger focusing gradients are possible using solenoids than using quadrupoles , and unlike quadrupoles , solenoids have the virtue of focusing both transverse dimensions simultaneously , giving a more compact lattice . while a high - field solenoid can produce a small ( and constant ) @xmath19
, it is straightforward to see that a single such solenoid is not sufficient for muon cooling @xcite . a charged particle entering a solenoid off - axis receives a transverse magnetic kick from the fringe field , such that the particle s straight - line motion in the field - free region becomes helical motion within the solenoid .
the exit fringe field must thus impart an equal and opposite kick so that the particle resumes its straight - line motion in the subsequent field - free region .
if within the solenoid the particle loses energy in an absorbing medium , the angular momentum of its helical motion must decrease , resulting in an imbalance between the entrance and exit kicks .
the particle then exits the magnet with a net angular momentum , implying that a parallel beam entering an absorber - filled solenoid will diverge upon exiting . to cancel this net angular momentum ,
the field direction must alternate periodically .
the simplest case conceptually is focusing by a constant solenoidal field , but with one field flip " halfway along the cooling channel @xcite .
the length of a uniform section can be of order @xmath34 m .
better performance can be achieved by adding a second field flip @xcite . at an opposite extreme
, the solenoidal - field direction can be flipped every meter or so , leading to a variety of solenoidal - focusing lattices dubbed alternating solenoid @xcite , fofo @xcite , dfofo @xcite , sfofo ( see fig . [
fig : sfofo ] ) , etc .
detailed six - dimensional simulations show that enough transverse cooling can be achieved to build a high - performance neutrino factory @xcite , using either a double - flip or sfofo cooling lattice .
for example , in palmer s recent sfofo design an initial transverse normalized emittance of @xmath35mm@xmath36rad is cooled in a 400-m - long cooling system to a final emittance of @xmath37mm@xmath36rad with @xmath2875% muon loss @xcite .
such a facility would produce @xmath38 neutrinos per year aimed at a far detector that could be thousands of km from the source , giving oscillation sensitivity at least two orders of magnitude beyond that of long - baseline experiments now under construction @xcite . without longitudinal - transverse emittance exchange , transverse cooling reaches a point of diminishing returns as emittance growth in the longitudinal phase plane causes muons to be lost from the rf bucket . while emittance exchange would be helpful but not essential for a neutrino factory , to achieve the considerably smaller emittances required in a muon collider , it is mandatory .
r&d on emittance exchange is ongoing , and several promising ideas are being actively explored @xcite .
however , _ nonlinear _ conservative forces can cause phase - space filamentation , " the practical effect of which is essentially growth of the beam s occupied phase - space volume , and stochastic cooling can be thought of as the opposite effect , in which particles are moved in phase space to make occupied regions of phase space more contiguous and move empty regions of phase space outside of the beam envelope .
g. k. oneill , phys .
rev . * 102 * , 1418 ( 1956 ) ; a. a. kolomensky , sov . atomic energy * 19 * , 1511 ( 1965 ) ; g. i. budker , a. n. skrinsky , sov .
* 21 * , 277 ( 1978 ) ; d. neuffer , fnal report fn-319 ( 1979 ) ; a. n. skrinsky , v. v. parkhomchuk , sov .
j. nucl .
* 12 * , 223 ( 1981 ) ; d. neuffer , part .
* 14 * , 75 ( 1983 ) ; e. a. perevedentsev , a. n. skrinsky , in _ proc .
12th int .
conf . on high energy accelerators _ ,
f. t. cole , r. donaldson , eds .
( fermilab , 1984 ) , p. 485 .
however , at sufficiently high energy , a proposed technique known as optical stochastic cooling " may become practical ; see a. zholents , m. zolotorev , w. wan , phys .
st accel .
beams * 4 * , 031001 ( 2001 ) .
another possibility is liquid - lithium lenses , which could serve as both the focusing element and the absorbing material .
prototype studies in novosibirsk have so far been unsuccessful .
a third possibility is high - pressure gaseous absorbers @xcite .
a. moretti _ et al .
_ , proc .
20th international linac conference ( linac 2000 ) , monterey , california , 21 - 25 aug 2000 , p. 896
( econf c000821:thc18 , 2000 ) ; j. corlett _
et al . _ , to appear in proc .
pac2001 ( 2001 ) .
the numbers quoted above include the minicooling " section , located upstream of the buncher , " which precedes the sfofo channel . in the @xmath28110-m - long sfofo channel itself the emittance is cooled from @xmath2813@xmath42 to 2.8@xmath42mm@xmath36rad with @xmath2850% muon loss . | high - energy muon beams proposed powerful sources for neutrino scattering oscillation studies enable energy - frontier lepton - antilepton colliders advantages for studying electroweak symmetry breaking production high - energy muon beams muon - beam cooling to accelerate secondary tertiary beam decrease size produced particles fit inside apertures beamline focusing element quadrupole magnets with opposed field gradients decrease area charged - particle beam spread transverse momentum divergence liouville s theorem conservative forces can not increase or decrease volume beam in six - dimensional phase space focusing alone for efficient acceleration secondary beam increase divergence beam aperture needed process beam size divergence analogy with refrigeration decreases random relative motions of molecules gas known as beam _ cooling_ represent volume of phase space by beam by beam s _ emittance_ emittance expressed as @xmath0 @xmath1 root - mean - square emittance in units of length @xmath4 mass of beam particle @xmath5 speed of lightneglecting correlations coordinates momenta @xcite @xmath6 for six - dimensional emittance subscript @xmath7 distinguishes normalized emittances from unnormalized emittance @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 relativistic factors unnormalized emittance transverse beam sizes by @xmath11 @xmath12 transverse amplitude functions of focusing lattice in @xmath13 @xmath14 directions focusing strength low @xmath15 strong focusing @xmath16th direction liouville s theorem normalized emittance constant motion beam cooling requires violation liouville s theorem possible dissipative forces ionization energy loss @xcite cooling transverse phase - space coordinates muon beam passing through energy - absorbing material accelerating structures focusing magnetic lattice known ionization cooling @xcite other cooling techniques laser slow yield phase - space compression muon lifetime ionization absorbing material muons decreases muon momentum beam size constitutes cooling multiple coulomb scattering muons absorber increases beam divergence heating beameq : eps - n path length rate change normalized transverse emittance within absorber given by @xcite @xmath17 angle brackets mean value muon energy @xmath18 gev @xmath19 location absorber @xmath20 radiation length absorber medium @xcite expression cylindrically - symmetric case solenoidal focusing @xmath21 first term eq cool cooling second heating term minimize heating term proportional to @xmath10 function radiation length proposed use hydrogen energy - absorbing medium @xmath22mev / m @xmath23 m @xcite superconducting - solenoid focusing small @xmath24 cm @xcite issues absorber r&d large heat deposition muon minimizing scattering in absorber - vessel windows requirement high - gradient reacceleration of muons between absorbers replace lost energy ionization - cooling process absorbers cool beam radio - frequency accelerating - cavity gradients rf cavities dominate length cooling channel fig . sfofo achievable rf gradient determines cooling before muons decayed eq .percentage decrease normalized emittance proportional to energy loss cooling transverse dimension factor 1/@xmath27 requires @xmath28100% energy loss replacement rf power favors low beam energy for cost reacceleration increase @xmath29 decreased width @xmath30 distribution at low momentum muon - cooling simulations used @xmath31mev/@xmath5 pursuing r&d on high - gradient normal - conducting rf cavities for solenoidal - focusing lattice transverse ionization cooling causes longitudinal emittance @xmath32 grow fluctuations energy loss absorbers cause growth energy spread beam negative slope @xmath29 momentum dependence low - momentum large - divergence beams have spread propagation velocity through cooling lattice bunch lengthening result in loss particles rf bucket alleviated by longitudinal cooling longitudinal ionization cooling possible impractical realization operation above ionization minimum @xmath29 slope momentum positive weak cooling effect overcome by energy - loss straggling envisioned emittance exchange between longitudinal transverse degrees freedom decreasing longitudinal emittance increasing transverseemittance exchange by placing shaped absorber in lattice location where dispersion using bending magnetic field to spread muons according to momenta shaping absorber absorb more energy from higher - momentum muons less from lower - momentum emittance exchange than longitudinal cooling muon momentum spread reduced by absorber beam can be reconverged to small spot by bend followed by transverse ionization cooling equivalent to longitudinal cooling @xcite focusing - lattice designs for transverse muon cooling studied using solenoids as focusing elements for large m aperture stronger focusing gradients possible using solenoids than quadrupoles both transverse dimensions simultaneously compact lattice high - field solenoid can produce small @xmath19 single solenoid not sufficient for muon cooling @xcite charged particle entering solenoid receives transverse magnetic kick from fringe field straight - line motion becomes helical motion within solenoid exit fringe field impart equal opposite kick resumes motion if particle loses energy in absorbing medium angular momentum helical motion imbalance between entrance and exit kicksparticle exits magnet with net angular momentum parallel beam entering absorber solenoid to cancel momentum field direction periodically simplest case focusing by constant solenoidal field one field flip halfway along cooling channel length uniform section @xmath34 m better performance second field flip opposite solenoidal - field direction flipped every meter solenoidal - focusing lattices alternating solenoid fofo dfofo sfofo simulations show transverse cooling high - performance neutrino factory using double - flip or sfofo cooling lattice in palmer s sfofo design initial transverse emittance of @xmath35mm@xmath36rad cooled in 400-m - long cooling system to final emittance @xmath37mm@xmath36rad with @xmath2875% muon loss facility @xmath38 neutrinos per year far detector thousands from source oscillation sensitivity two orders of magnitude beyond long - baseline experiments without longitudinal - transverse emittance exchange transverse cooling emittance growth causes muons from emittance exchange not essential for neutrino factory smaller emittances muon collider mandatoryr&d on emittance exchange ongoing promising ideas explored nonlinear conservative forces cause phase - space filamentation growth beam s occupied phase - space volume stochastic cooling opposite effect particles moved in phase space occupied regions contiguous empty regions outside beam envelope oneill . rev . 102, 1418 ( 1956 ) kolomensky atomic energy 19 1511 ( 1965 ) budker skrinsky 21 277 ( 1978 ) d. neuffer report fn-319 ( 1979 ) skrinsky parkhomchuk 12 223 ( 1981 ) d. neuffer 14 75 ( 1983 ) perevedentsev skrinsky 12th int . conf. on high energy accelerators. cole donaldson 1984 ) p. 485 high energy proposed optical stochastic cooling may become practical. zholents zolotorev w. wan phys . beams 4 031001 ( 2001 ) another possibility liquid - lithium lenses serve focusing element absorbing material prototype studies in novosibirsk unsuccessful third possibility high - pressure gaseous absorbers a. moretti20th international linac conference monterey california 21 - 25 aug 2000 p. 896 c000821:thc18 j corlett pac2001 numbers include minicooling section upstream buncher precedes sfofo channel @xmath28110-m - long sfofo channel emittance cooled from @xmath2813 to 2.8@xmath42mm@xmath36rad muon loss | 0.502755 | 3,132 | 1,549 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,312 | we present numerical calculations of the production cross section of a heavy @xmath0 resonance in hadron - hadron collisions with subsequent decay into top - antitop pairs . in particular , we consider the leptophobic topcolor @xmath0 discussed under model iv of hep - ph/9911288 which has predicted cross sections large enough to be experimentally accessible at the fermilab tevatron and the large hadron collider at cern .
this article presents an updated calculation valid for the tevatron and all proposed lhc collision energies .
cross sections are presented for various @xmath0 widths , in @xmath1 collisions at @xmath2 tev , and in @xmath3 collisions at @xmath4 , 8 , 10 and 14 tev .
fermilab - fn-0940-cms - ppd + | electroweak symmetry breaking is a cornerstone for our understanding of particle physics . however , despite the spectacular phenomenological success of the standard model ( sm ) , the fundamental mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking remains a mystery .
various new models have been proposed to explain this mechanism .
one such class of models is based upon topcolor @xcite which can generate a large top - quark mass .
the topcolor model also predicts a @xmath0 @xcite .
the physics in production and decay of the @xmath0 are discussed in ref .
@xcite under different model assumptions . in this paper
, we consider the @xmath0 from model iv which represents a novel class and has predicted cross sections large enough to be experimentally accessible at hadron colliders at the fermilab tevatron and the large hadron collider ( lhc ) at cern .
such @xmath0 resonances couple strongly only to the first and third generations of quarks , and have no significant couplings to the leptons .
they are , therefore , leptophobic and topophyllic .
this article presents an updated calculation valid for the tevatron and all proposed lhc collision energies .
the leptophobic topcolor @xmath0 decaying to @xmath5 has been searched for at both the tevatron @xcite and the lhc @xcite .
the tevatron searches used a previous calculation of the @xmath0 cross section @xcite . the lhc search conducted by the cms collaboration
have used the cross section calculation presented here to set limits on the @xmath0 mass .
this article is primarily intended to document that @xmath0 cross section used for a @xmath3 collision energy of @xmath6 tev . for current and future lhc searches ,
we present the @xmath0 cross section at the current lhc @xmath3 collision energy of @xmath7 tev and the potential future collision energies of 10 and 14 tev . we also present the cross section in @xmath8 collisions at @xmath9 tev for comparison with tevatron searches .
as discussed in ref .
@xcite , non - standard models can be constructed in which the @xmath10 and the generations are grouped differently .
model iv is the case where quark generations @xmath11 .
the dominant part of the interaction lagrangian for model iv is : l_iv & = & ( g_1_h)z^ ( |t_l_t_l + |b_l_b_l + f_1|t_r_t_r . + & & .
+ f_2|b_r_b_r -|u_l_u_l -|d_l_d_l -f_1|u_r_u_r .
-f_2|d_r_d_r ) , where @xmath12 is the sm coupling constant , and we require the following : @xmath13 ( attractive @xmath14 channel ) and/or @xmath15 ( repulsive @xmath16 channel ) . also , @xmath17 to avoid fine - tuning .
the parton - level subprocess cross section that we use in the next section is obtained from this lagrangian .
the total lowest - order cross section for a @xmath0 produced in hadron collisions and decaying into top - antitop pairs from model iv discussed above , is given by : @xmath18 where @xmath19 , the differential cross section at @xmath5 invariant mass @xmath20 , is given by @xmath21 here @xmath22 is the parton - level subprocess cross section .
the kinematic variable @xmath23 is related to the initial - state parton fractional momenta inside the first hadron @xmath24 and the second hadron @xmath25 by @xmath26 .
the boost of the partonic system @xmath27 is given by @xmath28 .
the partonic `` luminosity function '' is just the product of parton distribution functions : @xmath29 where @xmath30 ( @xmath31 ) is the parton distribution function of a quark ( anti - quark ) evaluated at fractional momenta @xmath32 and renormalization scale @xmath33 .
the parton - level subprocess cross section , @xmath22 , for a leptophobic , b@xmath34-phobic , and topophyllic , @xmath0 is given by : @xmath35 \left [ \frac{s}{(\hat{s}-m_{z'}^2)^2 + \hat{s}\gamma_{z'}^2 } \right]\theta(\hat{s}-4m_t^2 ) , \label{eq_sigma_iv}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath36 can be obtained from the total decay - width of the resonance @xcite : @xmath37 . } \label{eq_gamma_iv}\ ] ] the subprocess cross section in eq .
[ eq_sigma_iv ] is for spin and color summing on both initial and final state legs , while most parton distributions assume spin and color averaged on the initial - state legs and spin and color summing on the final - state legs .
therefore , the subprocess cross section given by eq .
[ eq_sigma_iv ] must be multiplied by a factor of @xmath38 when used with parton distributions from pdflib @xcite and other standard sources .
we have taken this into account when calculating the cross section .
we have also used @xmath39 gev / c@xmath40 , and @xmath41 .
for a default parton distribution set we have chosen cteq6l @xcite .
this is a modern parton distribution set appropriate for leading - order calculations and is available in pdflib @xcite . for a default renormalization scale
we choose @xmath42 , half the @xmath5 invariant mass .
this scale has the benefit that it reduces to the usual @xmath43 at top production threshold , but also increases with increasing @xmath5 invariant mass . with these choices ,
the total cross section for the production of a leptophobic and topophyllic @xmath0 and its subsequent decay into @xmath44 pairs is presented in sections [ sec : tevatron ] and [ sec : lhc ] for the tevatron and the lhc .
we calculate numerically the lowest order cross section for the process @xmath45 at the tevatron at @xmath9 tev , using eq .
[ eq_tot_xsec ] and taking into account the spin - color factor in eq .
[ eq_spin_color ] .
the only remaining parameter of the topcolor model that affects the cross section is the mixing angle @xmath46 , or equivalently the width @xmath47 which is related to it .
we calculate the cross section for different choices of @xmath47 , equal to @xmath48 and @xmath49 of @xmath50 , both of which qualify as narrow resonances at the tevatron .
the integration in eq .
[ eq_tot_xsec ] is performed using the full available phase space of @xmath51 .
the results are tabulated in table [ tab : zprimexsectev2 ] and displayed in fig .
[ fig : tevatron ] . | electroweak symmetry breaking cornerstone particle physics success standard model fundamental mechanism mystery new models proposed topcolor @xcite large top - quark mass predicts @xmath0 @xcite physics production decay @xmath0 discussed in @xcite model assumptions @xmath0 from model iv novel class predicted cross sections at hadron colliders fermilab tevatron large hadron collider lhc cern @xmath0 resonances couple to first third generations quarks no significant couplings to leptons leptophobic topophyllic presents updated calculation for tevatron proposed lhc collision energies leptophobic topcolor @xmath0 decaying to @xmath5 searched at tevatron @xcite lhc @xcite tevatron searches used previous calculation @xmath0 cross section lhc search used cross section calculation limits @xmath0 mass article @xmath0 cross section for @xmath3 collision energy of @xmath6 tev @xmath0 cross section at current lhc @xmath3 collision energy @xmath7 tev potential future collision energies 10 14 tev present cross section @xmath8 collisions @xmath9 comparison tevatron searches non - standard models constructed @xmath10 generations grouped differently model iv quark generations @xmath11 dominant interaction l_iv = g_1_h)z_l_l_l_l f_1_r_r_l_l_l @xmath12 sm coupling constant require @xmath13 attractive @xmath14 @xmath15 repulsive @xmath16 channel @xmath17 avoid fine - tuning parton - level subprocess cross section obtained lagrangian total lowest - order cross section @xmath0 hadron collisions top - antitop pairs given @xmath18 @xmath19 differential cross section @xmath5 invariant mass @xmath20 given @xmath21 @xmath22 parton - level subprocess cross section kinematic variable @xmath23 related initial - state parton fractional momenta first hadron @xmath24 second hadron @xmath25 @xmath26 boost partonic system @xmath27 @xmath28partonic luminosity function product of parton distribution functions @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 parton distribution function quark evaluated at fractional momenta @xmath32 renormalization scale @xmath33 parton - level subprocess cross section @xmath22 leptophobic@xmath34-phobic topophyllic @xmath0 given by @xmath35\frac{s}{(-m_{z'}^2)^2 +\gamma_{z'}^2\theta(\hat{s}-4m_t^2 ){eq_sigma_iv} @xmath36 obtained from total decay - width resonance @xcite @xmath37 subprocess cross section in_sigma_iv for spin color summing on initial final state legs most parton distributions assume spin color averaged subprocess cross section multiplied by factor @xmath38 with parton distributions from pdflib @xcite standard sources cross section used @xmath39@xmath40 @xmath41 default parton distribution set cteq6l @xcite modern available pdflib default renormalization scale @xmath42 half @xmath5 invariant mass scale reduces to @xmath43 at top production threshold increases with @xmath5 invariant mass total cross section for production leptophobic topophyllic @xmath0 decay into @xmath44 pairs presented in sections tevatron lhc ] calculate lowest order cross section for @xmath45 at tevatron @xmath9 tev using_tot_xsec spin - color factor parameter cross section mixing angle @xmath46 width @xmath47 calculate cross section for choices of @xmath47 equal to @xmath48 @xmath49 of @xmath50 narrow resonances at tevatron integration in eq_tot_xsec ] using full phase space of @xmath51 results tabulated in table [ zprimexsectev2 displayed in fig . tevatron | 0.261934 | 1,568 | 830 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,329 | among many bechgaard salts , ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 exhibits very anomalous low temperature properties . unlike conventional spin density wave ( sdw ) , ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 undergoes the sdw transition at @xmath2k and the low temperature quasiparticle excitations are gapless .
also , it is known that ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 does not exhibit superconductivity even under pressure , while fisdw is found in ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 only for @xmath3kbar and @xmath4 t . here
we shall show that both the angle dependent magnetoresistance data and the nonlinear hall resistance of ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 at ambient pressure are interpreted satisfactory in terms of unconventional spin density wave ( usdw ) .
based on these facts , we propose a new phase diagram for bechgaards salts . | ( tmtsf)@xmath0@xmath5 are quasi one dimensional molecular conductors , known as bechgaard salts , where tmtsf denotes tetramethyltetraselenafulvalene and @xmath5 is an inorganic anion with various possible symmetries : spherical ( octahedral ) ( @xmath5@xmath6pf@xmath7 , asf@xmath7 ) , tetrahedral ( @xmath5@xmath6clo@xmath8 , reo@xmath8 ) , or triangular ( no@xmath1 ) .
the well known are their very complex ( pressure , magnetic field , temperature ) phase diagrams with a variety of electronic ground states : ( conventional ) spin density wave ( sdw ) , field induced sdw ( fisdw ) , superconductivity ( triplet , unconventional ) , unconventional spin density wave ( usdw).@xcite the observation of superconductivity in the ( tmtsf)@xmath0@xmath5 series requires the use of high pressure , with the exception of ( tmtsf)@xmath0clo@xmath8 , which is superconducting under ambient pressure , and ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 , which never becomes a superconductor even under pressure .
no@xmath1 anions are in an orientational disorder at ambient pressure and for @xmath9k .
the anion ordering ( ao ) transition takes place at @xmath10k , with wave vector @xmath11 .
contrary to ao in most other salts , @xmath12 has the nonzero component parallel to the most conducting direction .
the sdw state develops below @xmath2k . from the resistivity data very small activation energy was obtained , of order of @xmath13ev , but the curvature of the @xmath14 vs. @xmath15 plot indicated that the ground state should be considered as semimetalic , rather than semiconducting.@xcite the phase diagram of bechgaard salts under pressure is interpreted in terms of the standard model , where the approximate nesting of the quasi - one dimensional fermi surface ( i.e. the imperfect nesting ) , and the repulsive coulomb interaction between electrons are the crucial ingredients.@xcite the applied pressure increases the 2-dimensionality of bechgaard salts through the increase of the imperfect nesting term.@xcite however , the standard model does not yet describe neither the triplet@xcite superconductivity nor usdw .
udw is a density wave , whose gap function depends on the wavevector , vanishes on certain subsets of the fermi surface , allowing for low energy excitations .
the average of the gap function over the fermi surface is zero , causing the lack of periodic modulation of the charge and/or spin density . as noted by nersesyan et al .
( refs . and ) , the quasiparticle spectrum in udw is quantized in a magnetic field .
this landau quantization gives rise to the spectacular angle dependent magnetoresistance ( admr ) and giant nernst effect.@xcite as we shall see later both the angle dependent magnetoresistance@xcite and the nonlinear hall resistance@xcite of ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 are described nicely in terms of usdw .
we note that an earlier attempt to describe the magnetoresistance of ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 in terms of conventional sdw with a _ large imperfect nesting _ might not be the most appropriate model,@xcite since it can not describe the details of the resistance quantitatively .
we also propose the revision of the generally accepted phase diagram , taking into account the identification of usdw state in several bechgaard compounds.@xcite
here we summarize briefly what is known about unconventional density wave.@xcite the unconventional density wave is a kind of density wave , where the quasiparticle energy gap vanishes along lines on the fermi surface . in the present instance
we can assume @xmath16 or @xmath17 as in earlier analysis of ucdw in @xmath18(et)@xmath0khg(scn)@xmath8.@xcite then the quasiparticle green function is given by @xmath19 where @xmath20 s are the pauli matrices and @xmath21 operates on the nambu spinor space.@xcite the quasiparticle energy in udw is formed from the pole of @xmath22 as @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the kinetic energy of electrons measured from the fermi energy in the normal state , @xmath25 , @xmath26 is the imperfect nesting term and @xmath27 . here , @xmath28 denotes the fermi velocity in the chain ( @xmath29 ) direction , @xmath30 is the order parameter for unconventional sdw , and @xmath31 is the lattice constant . then in a magnetic field @xmath32 in the @xmath33 plane with angle @xmath34 from the @xmath35 axis the quasiparticle energy changes into @xmath36 with @xmath37 .
here we have neglected @xmath26 for simplicity .
also in the following we assume @xmath38 and @xmath39m / s.@xcite eq .
( [ eq:3 ] ) is the consequence of the landau quantization of the quasiparticle spectrum in udw , or the _
nersesyan effect_.@xcite then the conductivity tensor is constructed as @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 with @xmath43\ ] ] where @xmath44 and we have assumed that @xmath45 .
also , we have assumed that @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 and @xmath50 are weakly dependent on @xmath51 and @xmath52 .
then from eqs.([eq : sxx])([eq : sxy ] ) we can construct the resistivity tensor as @xmath53 @xmath54 in fig .
[ fig : admr ] we show our fitting of the angle dependent magnetoresistance data for ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 at @xmath55k for a variety of magnetic field.@xcite ( color online ) the angular dependence of the normalized resistance @xmath56 at @xmath57k ( full lines : experimental data ; dashed lines : fits to the theory ) .
magnetic field is rotated in @xmath33 plane , and @xmath58 corresponds to @xmath59 .
data are from ref .
( @xmath60 t ) and ref .
( @xmath61t).,width=325 ] from this fitting we obtain usdw order parameter @xmath62k and @xmath63 .
as is readily seen the fitting is excellent except for the bumpy structures .
these should come from the imperfect nesting term as discussed in refs . , and .
also we note @xmath64 indicating that @xmath65 ; therefore @xmath66 is dominated by the @xmath67 excitations . in fig .
[ fig : rxy ] we show @xmath68 fitted by eq.([eq : rxy ] ) ; again we obtain reasonable fitting with @xmath69 t .
( color online ) the magnetic field @xmath52 dependence of hall resistance @xmath68 at several temperatures ( points : experimental data ; dashed lines : fit to the theory ) .
data are from ref .. ,width=325 ] figure [ fig : fitparams ] shows temperature dependence of the parameter @xmath70 , along with the temperature dependence of the fitting parameters @xmath70 ( @xmath71 ) see text .
dashed line shows temperature dependence of the resistance @xmath72 of ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 for @xmath73.,width=325 ] temperature dependence of the resistance @xmath72 .
there appears to be a slight change of the parameter @xmath70 across @xmath74k : for @xmath75k it follows temperature dependence of resistance @xmath72 , while for lower temperature it is nearly constant .
it signals the possible occurrence of yet another phase transition at @xmath76k as in ( tmtsf)@xmath0pf@xmath7 , in agreement with several other suggestions.@xcite
recently , one of us proposed phase diagram for bechgaard salts with octahedral ( centrosymmetric ) anion like pf@xmath7 which exhibit metallic behaviour down to the sdw transition at @xmath77k ( see ref . ) .
the salts with non - centrosymmetric anions undergo the ao transition and become insulating at ambient pressure , except for @xmath5@xmath6clo@xmath8 and no@xmath1 . here
, we propose an extension / revision of the phase diagram ( see fig . [
fig : phasediag ] ) . as indicated in fig .
[ fig : phasediag ] , the schematic pressure temperature phase diagram for bechgaard salts .
arrows denote position of ( tmtsf)@xmath0pf@xmath7 , ( tmtsf)@xmath0clo@xmath8 and ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 in the phase diagram at ambient pressure.,width=302 ] ( tmtsf)@xmath0pf@xmath7 at ambient pressure undergoes yet another transition around @xmath78k . the drastic change in the quasi - particle spectrum through @xmath79 has been interpreted as appearance of sdw+usdw.@xcite further , from the angle dependent magnetoresistance of ( tmtsf)@xmath0pf@xmath7 and ( tmtsf)@xmath0reo@xmath8 for @xmath80kbar the existence of usdw in the high pressure range is inferred.@xcite then , it is customarily to put ( tmtsf)@xmath0clo@xmath8 at ambient pressure around @xmath81kbar in fig .
[ fig : phasediag ] , where transition from metallic state to superconducting one takes place . in
this way we may understand the superconductivity at ambient pressure . similarly , we may put ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 at ambient pressure around @xmath82kbar , since the transition from metallic state to density wave state takes place at @xmath2k .
the further behaviour of @xmath83 vs. pressure is based on the experiments , which have shown that @xmath83 is gradually suppressed under increasing pressure.@xcite then is the absence of superconductivity , and appearance of fisdw only at high pressure and high magnetic fields ( @xmath84kbar , @xmath85t),@xcite very surprising .
we think that the lack of inversion symmetry in no@xmath1 is at the heart of the absence of superconductivity and fisdw ( for low pressure , @xmath86kbar ) in ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 .
for example p.w.anderson@xcite speculated that the triplet superconductor can not exist in a crystal without inversion symmetry .
also the nature of superconductivity in cept@xmath1si , the crystal without inversion symmetry , is hotly discussed in the current literature.@xcite the inversion symmetry breaking is usually characterized by @xmath87 the chiral symmetry breaking term or the rashba term,@xcite both the absence of the triplet superconductivity ( for @xmath88k ) and the appearance of fisdw for @xmath4 t suggest @xmath89k . also this @xmath87 appears to be consistent with @xmath10k ( @xmath90).@xcite we believe that further study of the electronic properties of ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 is of great interest .
we have shown that the anomalous low temperature behaviour of admr and hall resistance of the bechgaard salt ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 could be interpreted in terms of unconventional spin density wave , indicating that the possible ground state below @xmath91k is usdw .
this is consistent with the new phase diagram of bechgaard salts proposed recently,@xcite which we in adition revised and extended in this paper . therefore , it will be of great interest to study how the usdw order parameter @xmath30 changes as the pressure is applied .
this will provide a first step to explore the wider phase diagram .
another question is if there are other candidates in bechgaard salts which exhibit usdw under ambient pressure .
we have also proposed possible explanation about the absence of superconductivity .
both the absence of superconductivity and partial suppression of fisdw ( i.e. the absence of fisdw for @xmath92kbar , @xmath93 t ) are due to the inversion symmetry breaking associated with the no@xmath1 anion ordering . the details on this will be published elsewhere.@xcite we thank balazs dra , peter thalmeier and hyekyung won for useful suggestions .
thanks the hospitality of max - planck institut fr physik komplexer systeme at dresden , where the most of this work is done . | tmtsf)@xmath0@xmath5 are quasi one dimensional molecular conductors bechgaard salts tmtsf tetramethyltetraselenafulvalene @xmath5 inorganic anion symmetries spherical octahedral tetrahedral triangular complex pressure magnetic field temperature phase diagrams electronic ground states conventional spin density wave field induced sdw superconductivity spin density wave observation of superconductivity in tmtsf)@xmath0@xmath5 series requires high pressure exception of tmtsf)@xmath0clo@xmath8 superconducting under ambient pressure)@xmath0no@xmath1 never becomes superconductor under pressure no@xmath1 anions orientational disorder at ambient pressure @xmath9k anion ordering transition at @xmath10k wave vector @xmath11 @xmath12 has nonzero component parallel to conducting direction sdw state develops below @xmath2k small activation energy @xmath13ev curvature of @xmath14 vs. @xmath15 plot ground state semimetalic semiconductingphase diagram of bechgaard salts under pressure interpreted standard model approximate nesting quasi - one dimensional fermi surface imperfect nesting repulsive coulomb interaction between electrons crucial ingredients applied pressure increases 2-dimensionality salts imperfect nesting term standard model describe triplet superconductivity nor usdw udw is density wave gap function depends on wavevector vanishes on subsets fermi surface allowing low energy excitations average gap function over fermi surface zero lack of periodic modulation of charge spin density quasiparticle spectrum in udw quantized in magnetic field quantization angle dependent magnetoresistance giant nernst effect angle dependent magnetoresistance nonlinear hall resistance of ( tmtsf)@xmath0no@xmath1 described in usdw earlier attempt to describe magnetoresistance conventional sdw with large imperfect nesting might not be appropriate can not describe details resistance quantitatively propose revision of phase diagram identification of usdw state in bechgaard compounds unconventional density wave quasiparticle energy gap vanishes on fermi surfaceassume @xmath16 or @xmath17 earlier analysis ucdw @xmath18)@xmath0khg(scn@xmath8 quasiparticle green function by @xmath19 @xmath20 pauli matrices @xmath21 nambu spinor space quasiparticle energy udw formed pole @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 kinetic energy electrons fermi energy normal state @xmath25 @xmath26 imperfect nesting term @xmath27 @xmath28 fermi velocity chain direction @xmath30 order parameter unconventional sdw @xmath31 lattice constant magnetic field @xmath32 @xmath33 plane angle @xmath35 axis quasiparticle energy changes into @xmath36 @xmath37 neglected @xmath26 assume @xmath38 and @xmath39m consequence landau quantization quasiparticle spectrum udw nersesyan effect conductivity tensor constructed as @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath50 dependent on @xmath51 @xmath52 construct resistivity tensor as @xmath53 @xmath54 fig fig : admr fitting angle dependent magnetoresistance data@xmath0no@xmath1 @xmath55k variety magnetic field. angular dependence normalized resistance @xmath56 @xmath57k experimental data fits theory magnetic field rotated in @xmath33 plane @xmath58 corresponds to @xmath59 data from ref @xmath60 t ) @xmath61t). fitting usdw order parameter @xmath62k and @xmath63 fitting excellent bumpy structures imperfect nesting term @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 dominated by @xmath67 excitations fig . rxy @xmath68 fitted by eq.( rxy ] ) reasonable fitting with @xmath69 t magnetic field @xmath52 dependence hall resistance @xmath68 at several temperatures experimental data fit theory data from ref .. figure fitparams shows temperature dependence parameter @xmath70 fitting parameters @xmath70 line temperature dependence resistance @xmath72)@xmath0no@xmath1 slight change parameter @xmath70 across @xmath74k @xmath75k follows temperature dependence resistance @xmath72 lower temperature nearly constantsignals possible phase transition at @xmath76k tmtsf)@xmath0pf@xmath7 agreement suggestions proposed phase diagram bechgaard salts octahedral anion pf@xmath7 metallic behaviour sdw transition @xmath77k salts non - centrosymmetric anions undergo transition insulating at ambient pressure except @xmath5@xmath6clo@xmath8 no@xmath1 propose extension revision phase diagram fig phasediag schematic pressure temperature phase diagram bechgaard salts arrows denote position tmtsf)@xmath0pf@xmath7@xmath0clo@xmath8@xmath0no@xmath1 phase diagram ambient pressure tmtsf)@xmath0pf@xmath7 transition around @xmath78k change quasi - particle spectrum through @xmath79 interpreted appearance sdw+usdw angle dependent magnetoresistance of)@xmath0pf@xmath7@xmath8 for @xmath80kbar existence usdw high pressure range inferred put tmtsf)@xmath0clo@xmath8 ambient pressure around @xmath81kbar transition from metallic to superconducting understand superconductivity at ambient pressureput@xmath0no@xmath1 at ambient pressure around @xmath82kbar transition from metallic to density wave at @xmath2k behaviour of @xmath83 vs pressure experiments suppressed under increasing pressure absence of superconductivity appearance fisdw at high pressure high magnetic fields @xmath84kbar lack of inversion symmetry in@xmath1 superconductivity fisdw low pressure @xmath86kbar in@xmath0no@xmath1 p.anderson speculated triplet superconductor exist in crystal without inversion symmetry nature superconductivity in@xmath1si crystal without inversion symmetry discussed inversion symmetry breaking characterized by @xmath87 absence triplet superconductivity @xmath88k appearance of fisdw suggest @xmath89k @xmath87 consistent with @xmath10k @xmath90) further study of electronic properties of@xmath0no@xmath1 anomalous low temperature behaviour of admr hall resistance of bechgaard salt@xmath0no unconventional spin density wave possible ground state below @xmath91k is usdwconsistent with new phase diagram bechgaard salts proposed recently revised extended paper interest study usdw order parameter @xmath30 changes as pressure applied first step to explore phase diagram question other candidates in salts exhibit usdw under ambient pressure proposed explanation absence superconductivity partial suppression fisdw @xmath92kbar @xmath93 due to inversion symmetry breaking no@xmath1 anion ordering details published elsewhere thank balazs dra peter thalmeier hyekyung won for suggestions thanks hospitality max - planck institut physik komplexer dresden work done | 0.43013 | 2,899 | 1,518 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,349 | in this paper , we discuss duality about components of invariant variety of periodic points(ivpp)@xcite@xcite@xcite and fundamental domain of recurrence equation , and present an algorithm for the derivation of all components of ivpps of any rational maps .
it is based on the study of two examples of a 2 dimensional map and a 3 dimensional map . in particular , all components of ivpps of the 2 dimensional example are completely determined by means of the cyclotomic polynomials@xcite . | the invariant variety of periodic points , or the ivpp for short@xcite@xcite@xcite , of a @xmath0 dimensional map @xmath1 , @xmath2 with @xmath3 invariants @xmath4 of period @xmath5 is a `` variety '' of periodic points @xmath6 which is given by only the invariants @xmath7 the ivpp has an important property which is called the ivpp theorem@xcite@xcite@xcite : _ let f be a @xmath0 dimensional `` rational '' map with @xmath3 invariants . if @xmath8 , an ivpp and discrete periodic points on a level set of any period do not exist in one map , simultaneously . _
the ivpp theorem gives an essential information of the integrability of the map . because a julia set@xcite which characterizes a non integrable system is given by the closure of the sum set of discrete `` repulsive '' periodic points on a level set .
therefore it seems that the existence of ivpp / julia set is incompatible with the existence of julia set / ivpp .
this conjecture leads to the sufficient conditions of the integrability of a map as follows : _ if a map @xmath9 has an ivpp / julia set then the map @xmath9 is integrable / non integrable . _ in particular , the reason why the ivpp is interesting , is a phenomenon that periodic points become a set of continuum points .
there have been derived many ivpps of various maps in the form of algebraic varieties , however , there have never been investigated the structure of an ivpp in detail .
one of our purposes of this paper is to explore the component structure of an ivpp . on the other hand it was known@xcite
that , when a map is restricted on the ivpp of period @xmath10 it provides a recurrence equation@xcite@xcite of period @xmath10 , an equation whose solutions are @xmath10 periodic for all initial points .
we show that a @xmath0 dimensional recurrence equation has a discrete symmetry , hence it gives a decomposition of the @xmath0 dimensional space to `` fundamental domains '' .
in other words , components of ivpp are given by fundamental domains of the recurrence equation which is a restriction map on ivpp . hence comparing these two objects
we will find a relation of components of ivpp and fundamental domains of recurrence equation as follows : _ components of ivpp @xmath11 fundamental domains of recurrence equation _
in addition , we give an algorithm to derive components of ivpp for all rational maps at the final section .
this structure tells us an important information , how points move on ivpps . in this paper , we show two concrete examples of such component structure of ivpps which are restricted by the cyclotomic polynomial@xcite of the recurrence maps .
first , we introduce a 2 dimensional map and its ivpps@xcite . @xmath12 with an invariant @xmath13 @xmath14 we know general formula of the ivpps([ivpp ] ) of the map([map ] ) as follows@xcite : @xmath15 and explicit forms , which will be discussed in this paper , as follows : @xmath16 ) ] in this subsection , we give components of the ivpp of the map([map ] ) .
first , we give the flow of points on the ivpp of period 3 by symbolic calculus which is parametrized by @xmath17 as follows : @xmath18 now , we can give boundaries of components of the ivpp of period 3 in the @xmath17 direction by the substitution @xmath19 for @xmath17 of ( [ seq ] ) .
therefore we get the components of the ivpp of period 3 in the @xmath17 direction @xmath20 as follows , @xmath21 @xmath22 we can draw a picture of `` tiling '' of the ivpp of period 3 . :
red , @xmath23 : blue , @xmath24 : green . ]
all other periods are to be discussed in almost the same way of the case of period 3 : flow of points on the ivpp of period 4 : @xmath25 components of the ivpp of period 4 in the @xmath17 direction @xmath26 as follows : @xmath27 @xmath28 : red , @xmath29 : blue , @xmath30 : green , @xmath31 : pink . ]
the flow of points on the ivpp of period 5 are as follows , @xmath32 where @xmath33 .
we notice that the ivpp of period 5 is multivalued dependent on @xmath34 , hence we must discuss them separately .
we get components of ivpp of period 5 @xmath35 as follows , @xmath36 @xmath37 of components of ivpp of period 5 , @xmath38 : red , @xmath39 : blue , @xmath40 : green , @xmath41 : pink , @xmath42 : gold . ] of components of ivpp of period 5 , @xmath43 : red , @xmath44 : blue , @xmath45 : green , @xmath46 : pink , @xmath47 : gold . ] the flow of points on the ivpp of period 6 is as follows : @xmath48 therefore we get components of ivpp of period 6 as follows : @xmath49 @xmath50 : red , @xmath51 : blue , @xmath52 : green , @xmath53 : pink , @xmath54 : gold , @xmath55 : yellow . ]
in this section , we discuss the structure of the components of ivpps of the map ( [ map ] ) .
the map([map ] ) is reduced by the invariant as follows : @xmath56 or in the linear map form @xmath57 where @xmath58 .
it is a mbius map .
furthermore , we can transform @xmath59 to a diagonal matrix by coordinate transformation as @xmath60 therefore , we get a diagonal form of ( [ mob ] ) as follows : @xmath61 where the @xmath62 are eigenvalues of @xmath59 .
in other words , if we take a new invariant @xmath63 then the map ( [ mob2 ] ) is just a scale transformation @xmath64 this fact means that the ivpp of ( [ mob2 ] ) of period @xmath10 is given by a cyclotomic polynomial@xcite : @xmath65 hence the components of the ivpp of period @xmath10 of the map([mob2 ] ) is equivalent to an orbifold @xmath66 : cc ] ] we give a formula of @xmath17 direction boundaries @xmath67 of the components of ivpps of period @xmath10 as follows : @xmath68 where @xmath69 satisfies the @xmath10-order cyclotomic polynomial .
furthermore , a formula in @xmath70 space is also given by @xmath71 these formulas are given by the pull buck the @xmath72 iterated map ( [ mob2 ] ) to the @xmath72 iterated map ( [ mob ] ) as follows , @xmath73 where @xmath74 is the diagonalization matrix of @xmath59 .
the @xmath17 direction boundaries are given by the substitution @xmath19 for @xmath17 .
therefore we can get the formula([formula ] ) . finally , we give one more point of view about the boundaries of components of the ivpp .
we substitute @xmath19 for @xmath17 of the flow on the ivpp , hence the boundaries are given by the `` intersections of the ivpp and zero points set of denominators of iterations of the map '' .
we draw a graph of zero points set of the denominators of iterations of the map ( [ map ] ) as follows : ) , @xmath9 : red , @xmath75 : green , @xmath76 : yellow , @xmath77 : blue , @xmath78 : purple , @xmath79 : light blue . ]
next , we try to discuss 3 dimensional case . in particular , we discuss about the 3 dimensional lotka - volterra map@xcite , and only the ivpp of period 2 , because higher dimensional cases and higher period cases are difficult to write symbolic calculus and decompositions .
@xmath80 with invariants @xmath81 , @xmath82 we know some conditions of the ivpps of the map ( [ lvmap ] ) as follows@xcite : @xmath83 we draw the ivpp of period 2 in fig . [ lvivpp ] .
similar to the case of 2 dimensional map , we give a symbolic calculus on ivpp of period 2 .
@xmath84 where @xmath85 this case also is multivalued .
therefore we get components of ivpp of period 2 as follows : @xmath86_x= ( -\infty , 0 ] , \quad [ ( c_{2_\pm 2})_1]_x= ( 0 , 1 ] , \quad [ ( c_{2_\pm 1})_2]_x= ( 1 , \infty ] , \quad [ ( c_{2_\pm 2})_2]_x= ( 1 , \infty].\ ] ] of components of ivpp of period 2 , @xmath87 : red , @xmath88 : blue , @xmath87 : green , @xmath89 : pink . ] of components of ivpp of period 2 , @xmath90 : red , @xmath91 : blue , @xmath90 : green , @xmath92 : pink . ] here , we notice that each graph has two kinds of tiling , _
i.e. , _ red and blue pair and green pink pair in both the fig .
11 and fig . 12 .
it is a new phenomenon .
in addition , we should give a remark about the reason of appearance of the striped pattern of tilings of the ivpp .
the ivpp of period 2 is given by the condition as follows , @xmath93 then the ivpp of period 2 has a free parameter @xmath94 which is not restricted by this condition
. therefore we draw graphs by showing stripes corresponding to the parameter of invariant @xmath94 which is stepped by @xmath95 for visibility . in other words ,
each stripe is one of a level set corresponding to a part of ivpp . in general , any ivpps of the map([lvmap ] ) are given by one condition , hence we can solve the condition about @xmath96 .
in other words , any ivpps are described by one parameter @xmath94 .
we give a small remark about the relation of decompositions of ivpp and fundamental domains of the recurrence equation .
the recurrence equation of period 2 is a restriction on ivpp of period 2 of the map([lvmap ] ) as follows : @xmath97 we notice that the map([lvre ] ) is independent on the parameter @xmath94 . in a similar way as the case of 2 dimensional map([map ] ) , we can get a diagonal form @xmath98 and the fundamental domain is given by @xmath99 .
in order to conclude this paper we would like to give our algorithm to determine the components of ivpp for all rational maps : _ algorithm _ * give an initial point @xmath100 on ivpp .
if ivpp is multivalued , then we must use our algorithm for all parts .
* symbolic calculation of the mapping on the ivpp of period @xmath10 : @xmath101 * substitution for a minimum value of domain of parameters @xmath102 of the ivpp of period @xmath10 for any points @xmath103 . * changing the parameters of step 2 to positive direction ,
until go to other components .
* if there exists a non discussed domain when finished the above operations , then go to step 3 for non discussed domain .
* therefore we get component family of the ivpp of period @xmath10 in the @xmath104 direction about parameters @xmath105 . in conclusion , above discussions give a relation of decomposition of ivpp and the tiling as follows : @xmath106
i would like to thank dr .
s. saito and mr .
y. wakimoto for useful discussion
. 00 s. saito and n. saitoh , _ j. phys
_ , * 76 * no.2 p.024006 , 2007 . s. saito and n. saitoh
_ j. math .
phys _ , * 51 * 063501 , 2010 . s. saito and n. saitoh , _
`` invariant varieties of periodic points '' _ in mathematical physics research developments , 2008 nova science publishers , inc . ,
capt.3 pp 85 - 139 , 2008 .
wolfram mathworld , mathworld.wolfram.com/cyclotomicpolynomial.html .
r. l. devaney , _ `` an introduction to chaotic dynamical systems '' _ , westview press , 2003 .
r. l. graham , d. e. knuth and o. patashnik , _ concrete mathematics _
( addison - wesley ) , 1994 .
r. hirota and h. yahagi , _ j. phys
_ , * 71 * , 2867 , 2002 .
s. saito and n. saitoh , _ j. phys . a : math .
_ , * 40 * , 12775 - 12787 , 2007 .
s. saito , n. saitoh , h. harada , t. yumibayashi and y. wakimoto , aip advances , aip i d : 003306adv , 2013 .
r. hirota , s. tsujimoto and t. imai , _ future directions of nonlinear dynamics in physical and biological systems _ , ed . by p.l.christiansen at al . , p.7 ( plenum press , new york , 1993 ) .
r. hirota , and s. tsujimoto , _ j.phys.soc.jpn .
_ * 64 * 3125 - 3127 ( 1995 ) .
we do not discuss a reason of missing the ivpp of the map([mob ] ) of period 2 .
this reason is given from the transformation of invariant([newinv ] ) @xmath107 by the cyclotomic polynomial , the ivpp of the map([mob2 ] ) of period 2 is given @xmath108 . therefore if @xmath108 then @xmath94 is satisfied @xmath109 by ( [ newinv ] ) .
we check the values of @xmath70 when @xmath17 is ( real ) boundary of components of ivpps .
these are given by the formula ( [ formula2 ] ) : | invariant variety of periodic points ivpp of @xmath0 dimensional map with invariants @xmath4 period @xmath5 is variety of periodic points @xmath6 given by invariants @xmath7 ivpp has property ivpp theorem @xmath0 dimensional rational map with @xmath3 invariants @xmath8 ivpp discrete periodic points on level set period exist in one map simultaneously ivpp theorem gives essential information integrability map julia set non integrable system given by closure of sum discrete repulsive periodic points on level set existence ivpp / julia set incompatible with julia set / ivpp conjecture leads to sufficient conditions integrability map if map @xmath9 has ivpp / julia set is integrable / non integrable ivpp interesting periodic points become continuum points derived many ivpps of maps varieties never investigated structure of ivpp in detail paper to explore component structure of ivpp map restricted on ivpp of period @xmath10 provides recurrence equation solutions are periodic for all initial points@xmath0 dimensional recurrence equation has discrete symmetry gives decomposition space to fundamental domains components of ivpp given by fundamental domains restriction map on ivpp comparing objects relation of components of ivpp and fundamental domains equation components of ivpp @xmath11 fundamental domains of recurrence equation algorithm to derive components ivpp for rational maps final section structure points move on ivpps two examples of component structure ivpps restricted by cyclotomic polynomial@xcite of recurrence maps introduce 2 dimensional map and ivpps@xcite invariant @xmath13 @xmath14 general formula of ivpps( of map @xmath15 explicit forms @xmath16 give components of ivpp of map flow of points on ivpp of period 3 by symbolic calculus parametrized by @xmath17 give boundaries of components of ivpp of period 3 in @xmath17 direction by substitution @xmath19 for @xmath17 components of ivpp of period 3 in @xmath17 direction draw picture of tiling of ivpp of period 3red @xmath23 blue @xmath24 green other periods discussed same period 3 flow of points on ivpp period 4 @xmath25 components ivpp period 4 @xmath17 direction @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 red blue green pink flow of points ivpp period 5 @xmath32 @xmath33 ivpp period 5 multivalued dependent on @xmath34 discuss separately components of ivpp period 5 @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 components ivpp period 5 @xmath38 : red blue green @xmath41 pink @xmath42 : gold components ivpp period 5 @xmath43 : red : blue : green pink @xmath47 : gold flow of points on ivpp period 6 @xmath48 components ivpp period 6 @xmath49 @xmath50 red blue green pink : gold @xmath55 : yellow discuss structure of components of ivpps map ( ) map reduced by invariant @xmath56 linear map form @xmath57 where @xmath58 mbius map transform @xmath59 to diagonal matrix by coordinate transformation @xmath60 diagonal form of [ mob ] ) @xmath61 @xmath62 eigenvalues of @xmath59 new invariant @xmath63 map ( [ mob2 scale transformation @xmath64 ivpp of mob2 period @xmath10 by cyclotomic polynomial @xmath65 components ivpp period @xmath10 map equivalent to orbifold @xmath66 formula of @xmath17 direction boundaries @xmath67 components ivpps @xmath10 @xmath68 @xmath69 satisfies @xmath10-order cyclotomic polynomial formula in @xmath70 space by @xmath71 formulas @xmath72 iterated map mob2 to @xmath72 iterated map mob ] @xmath73 @xmath74 is diagonalization matrix of @xmath59 @xmath17 direction boundaries substitution @xmath19 for @xmath17 formula( ivpp substitute @xmath19 for @xmath17 boundaries given by intersections of ivpp and zero points denominators of iterations mapdraw graph zero points denominators iterations map @xmath9 : red @xmath75 : green @xmath76 : yellow @xmath77 : blue @xmath78 : purple @xmath79 : light blue discuss 3 dimensional case 3 dimensional lotka - volterra map ivpp period 2 higher dimensional difficult write symbolic calculus decompositions @xmath80 invariants @xmath81 @xmath82 conditions ivpps map @xmath83 draw ivpp period 2 fig . lvivpp 2 symbolic calculus on ivpp period 2 @xmath84 @xmath85 case multivalued components ivpp period 2 @xmath86_x= ( -\infty , 0 ]_x= ( 0 , 1 ]_2]_x= ( 1 , \infty_2]_x= ( 1 , \infty components ivpp period 2 @xmath87 : red @xmath88 : blue : green @xmath89 : pink components ivpp period 2 @xmath90 : red @xmath91 : blue green @xmath92 : pink each graph has two kinds tilingred blue green pink pair fig . 11 fig. 12 new phenomenon remark about striped pattern tilings ivpp ivpp of period 2 given by condition @xmath93 free parameter @xmath94 not restricted draw graphs stripes corresponding to parameter invariant @xmath94 stepped by @xmath95 for visibility each stripe level set part ivpp ivpps of map([lvmap given by one condition solve condition about @xmath96 ivpps described by one parameter @xmath94 remark relation of decompositions of ivpp fundamental domains recurrence equation recurrence equation period 2 restriction on ivpp period 2 map([lvmap map([lvre independent on parameter @xmath94 2 map diagonal form @xmath98 fundamental domain given by @xmath99 conclude algorithm to determine components of ivpp for rational maps initial point @xmath100 on ivpp if ivpp multivalued use algorithm for all parts symbolic calculation of mapping on ivpp period @xmath10 @xmath101 substitution for minimum value of domain of parameters @xmath102 of ivpp period @xmath10 for points @xmath103changing parameters step 2 positive direction other components non discussed domain operations step 3 component family ivpp period @xmath10 @xmath104 direction parameters @xmath105 discussions relation decomposition ivpp tiling @xmath106 thank dr s. saito y wakimoto discussion s. saito n. saitoh j. 76 * no.2 p.024006 2007 saito n math 51 * 063501 2010 saito n invariant varieties periodic points mathematical physics research developments 2008 nova science publishers pp 85 - 139 2008 wolfram mathworld/cyclotomicpolynomial l. devaney introduction chaotic dynamical systems westview press 2003 l. graham d e. knuth o. patashnik concrete mathematics - wesley 1994 r. hirota h. yahagi j. phys 71 2867 2002 saito n. saitoh j phys math 40 12775 - 12787 2007 saito n. saitoh h. harada t yumibayashi y wakimoto advances 003306adv 2013 r. hirota s. tsujimoto timai future directions nonlinear dynamics physical biological systems p.l.christiansen p.7 plenum press new york 1993 r. hirota s. tsujimoto j.phys.soc.jpn * 64 * 3125 - 3127 1995 ) discuss reason missing ivpp map([mob period 2 reason transformation invariant([newinv @xmath107 polynomial ivpp map period 2 given @xmath108 @xmath108 @xmath94 satisfied @xmath109 newinv ] check values @xmath70 @xmath17 boundary components ivpps given formula formula2 : | 0.500135 | 3,273 | 1,712 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,354 | hard processes are a well calibrated probe to study heavy - ion collisions . however , the information to be gained from the nuclear suppression factor @xmath0 is limited , hene one has to study more differential observables to do medium tomography .
the angular correlations of hadrons associated with a hard trigger appear suitable as they show a rich pattern when going from low @xmath1 to high @xmath1 . of prime interest
is the fate of away side partons with an in - medium pathlength @xmath2(several fm ) . at high
@xmath1 the correlations become dominated by the punchtrough of the away side parton with subsequent fragmentation .
we discuss what information about the medium density can be gained from the data . | considerable effort is made in the study of the energy loss of hard partons in the hot and dense medium created in ultrarelativistic heavy - ion collisions . in particular medium tomography ( i.e. gaining information about the medium density evolution ) by studying the nuclear suppression factor @xmath0 , the observed transverse momentum spectrum of hard hadrons divided by the scaled expectation from p - p collisions @xcite . however , as argued in @xcite , @xmath0 exhibits very limited sensitivity to the energy loss mechanism or properties of the medium beyond the fact that the quenching is substantial .
if one makes the ansatz that the local quenching power @xmath3 of the medium can be written as a function of the local energy density @xmath4 as @xcite @xmath5^{3/4}$ ] where @xmath6 is evolution proper time , @xmath7 spacetime rapidity and @xmath8 radius of the medium , adjusting the scale parameter @xmath9 parametrizes both the coupling strength of the parton to the medium and uncertainties in the determination of the medium evolution ( see @xcite ) . in @xcite
it was shown that there is about 50% uncertainty in the extraction of the medium quenching power ( given by @xmath9 ) from @xmath0 even for model evolutions which describe bulk soft matter properties ; a 2 + 1d hydrodynamical evolution @xcite , a 3 + 1d hydrodynamical evolution @xcite and a parametrized evolution @xcite .
greater sensitivity to the medium density evolution can hence only be gained in more differential probes such as @xmath10-hadron correlations @xcite , @xmath0 for non - central collisions @xcite or back - to - back hadron correlations @xcite , here we focus on the latter .
we make a monte carlo ( mc ) simulation of hard back - to - back processes in a medium in order to calculate the induced hard hadronic correlation pattern . the model is described in detail in @xcite .
there are three main elements : 1 ) the primary hard pqcd process 2 ) the description of the soft medium and 3 ) the energy loss from hard to soft degrees of freedom coupling 1 ) and 2 ) .
the energy loss for a given parton path is described in a probabilistic language . in order to determine the probability @xmath11 for a hard parton with energy @xmath12 to lose the energy @xmath13 while traversing the medium on its trajectory , we make use of a scaling law @xcite which allows to relate the dynamical scenario to a static equivalent one for each trajectory @xmath14 by calculating @xmath15 as a function of the jet production vertex @xmath16 and its angular orientation @xmath17 .
we set @xmath18 whenever the decoupling temperature of the medium @xmath19 is reached . using the numerical results of @xcite
, we obtain @xmath20 for @xmath21 and @xmath22 as a function of jet production vertex and the angle @xmath17 . from this , the probability distribution of energy loss reflected in single hadron observables ( such as @xmath0 )
can be computed by averaging over all possible production points determined by the nuclear overlap as @xmath23 the averaged energy loss probability underlying dihadron correlations involves a conditional probability of observing a high @xmath1 trigger hadron , hence it is more complicated and must be computed in the full mc simulation .
we do the simulation generating hard pqcd back - to - back events inside the evolving bulk matter model , using eq .
( [ e - omega ] ) to determine @xmath20 for each parton , followed by leading and next to leading fragmentation once the parton emerges from the medium @xcite . in all simulations ,
the scale parameter @xmath9 is adjusted such that the measured @xmath0 is described well , thus we are only interested in information beyond what can be extracted from single hadron observables .
we test six different spacetime evolution scenarios : 1 ) a 2 + 1d bjorken hydrodynamics simulation ( hydrodynamics ) 2 ) a 2 + 1 d bjorken hydrodynamics evolution in which quenching occurs only in the quark - gluon plasma phase ( black core ) , 3 ) a parametrized non - bjorken expansion with box density 4 ) a parametrized non - bjorken expansion with nuclear profile @xmath24 density 5 ) a bjorken expansion with box density and 6 ) a bjorken expansion with @xmath24 density @xcite . in this way
, we represent a selection of different longitudinal and transverse dynamics .
we compare the computed yield of associated hadrons as a function of momentum bin per trigger in the range @xmath25 gev on near and away side with the star data @xcite in fig .
[ f - ypt8 ] .
the near side is described well and there is broad agreement across all different medium models .
the reason is that in all cases @xmath26 is dominated by either transmission without energy loss or complete absorption , the kinematic window to observe shifts in parton energy is very narrow .
however , the probability distribution of experiencing a shift @xmath13 in energy is where tomographical information resides , thus , all scenarios appear similar for a small difference between trigger and associate @xmath1 .
since the away side yield is determined by a different ( conditional ) probability @xmath27 the models exhibit more pronounced differences .
all models fail in the momentum window between 4 and 6 gev to describe the data .
this is presumably due to the fact that pqcd and fragmentation is not the dominant mechanism of hadron production in this momentum regime . within errors ,
all scenarios except the black core one agree with the data above 6 gev associate momentum .
the black core scenario is characterized by a very high quenching power ( 48 gev@xmath28/fm at @xmath6 = 1 fm / c ) in the center and a large halo out of which partons can escape unhindered . on the other hand
, the hydrodynamics scenario shows less quenching power ( 11 gev@xmath28/fm at @xmath6 = 1 fm / c ) but has a larger extension .
we show the origin of dihadrons in each model in fig .
[ f - geo ] .
it is evident that dihadron production in the black core scenario is peripheral while in the hydrodynamics scenario it occurs in the whole medium . from the fact that only one of these scenarios ( hydrodynamics ) describes the data
, we can infer that the produced matter is not characterized by an opaque core and a dilute halo and that dihadron emission is not peripheral but probes indeed the central region of the medium .
while this is some promising start , a larger lever arm in trigger @xmath1 would be needed to be sensitive to shifts in parton energy instead of just absorption and to get more tomographical information @xcite . recently
, elastic energy loss has been suggested as an additional ingredient to describe the nuclear suppression @xcite . to the degree that the magnitude of this contribution is parametrically given by @xmath29 , these results place tight limits on the importance of collisional energy loss : since the integral has virtually no contribution from later times ( long paths ) , elastic energy loss can not resolve spatial structures larger than @xmath30 fm whereas the observed difference between near and away side yield relies on the fact that pathlength differences of the order of 5 fm or more are resolved .
10 m. gyulassy and x. n. wang , nucl . phys .
b * 420 * , ( 1994 ) 583 ; r. baier _ et al .
_ , nucl .
b * 484 * , ( 1997 ) 265 ; b. g. zakharov , jetp lett . *
65 * , ( 1997 ) 615 ; u. a. wiedemann , nucl .
b * 588 * , ( 2000 ) 303 ; m. gyulassy , p. levai and i. vitev , nucl .
b * 594 * , ( 2001 ) 371 ; x. n. wang and x. f. guo , nucl .
a * 696 * , ( 2001 ) 788 . | effort energy loss of hard partons in hot dense medium ultrarelativistic heavy - ion collisions medium tomography medium density evolution studying nuclear suppression factor @xmath0 transverse momentum spectrum hard hadrons divided scaled expectation p - p collisions @xmath0 limited sensitivity to energy loss mechanism medium quenching local quenching power @xmath3 medium function of local energy density @xmath4 @xcite @xmath5^{3/4 @xmath6 evolution time @xmath7 spacetime rapidity @xmath8 radius medium adjusting scale parameter @xmath9 parametrizes coupling strength parton medium uncertainties medium evolution @xcite 50% uncertainty in extraction medium quenching power @xmath9 from @xmath0 for model evolutions bulk soft matter properties greater sensitivity to medium density evolution in differential probes @xmath10-hadron correlations @xmath0 non - central back - to - back hadron correlations focus on latter monte carlo ) simulation of hard back - to - back processes medium calculate induced hard hadronic correlation pattern model described in @xcite three main elements primary hard pqcd process description soft medium energy loss from hard to soft freedom coupling energy loss for parton path described in probabilistic language determine probability for hard parton with energy to lose energy traversing medium scaling law @xcite dynamical scenario to static equivalent for each trajectory @xmath15 function jet production vertex angular orientation set @xmath18 whenever decoupling temperature medium reached numerical results obtain @xmath20 for @xmath21 @xmath22 function of jet production vertex angle probability distribution energy loss single hadron observables computed by averaging production points nuclear overlap averaged energy loss probability dihadron correlations involves conditional probability of high @xmath1 trigger hadron more complicated computed in full mc simulation hard pqcd back - to - back events evolving bulk matter model eq - determine @xmath20 for each parton followed by leading fragmentation once parton emerges from medium scale parameter @xmath9 adjusted measured @xmath0 described interested in information beyond single hadron observablestest six spacetime evolution scenarios 2 + 1d bjorken hydrodynamics simulation 2 2 + 1 d bjorken hydrodynamics evolution quenching quark - gluon plasma phase 3 parametrized non - bjorken expansion box density 4 nuclear profile @xmath24 density 5 box density 6 @xmath24 density @xcite represent longitudinal transverse dynamics compare computed yield hadrons momentum bin per trigger range @xmath25 gev near away side with star data @xcite fig . f - near side agreement across medium models @xmath26 dominated transmission without energy loss or absorption kinematic window shifts parton energy narrow probability distribution shift @xmath13 energy tomographical information resides scenarios similar small difference between trigger associate @xmath1 away side yield determined different probability @xmath27 models differences models fail momentum window between 4 and 6 gev pqcd fragmentation not dominant mechanism hadron production all scenarios except black core agree data above 6 gev momentumblack core scenario high quenching power 48 gev@xmath28/fm @xmath6 = 1 fm / c center large halo partons escape hydrodynamics scenario less quenching power 11 gev@xmath28/fm @xmath6 = 1 fm / c ) larger extension origin of dihadrons model fig . [ f - geo ] dihadron production black core peripheral hydrodynamics whole medium one hydrodynamics describes data produced matter not opaque core dilute halo dihadron emission not peripheral central region medium larger lever arm trigger @xmath1 needed shifts parton energy more tomographical information @xcite elastic energy loss suggested nuclear suppression @xcite magnitude given by @xmath29 results limits importance collisional energy loss integral no contribution elastic energy loss resolve spatial structures larger than @xmath30 fm difference near away side yield pathlength differences 5 fm or more resolved gyulassy x n. wang , nucl . phys . b * 420 * ( 1994 ) 583 ; baier et al nucl. * 484 1997 ) 265 ; zakharov jetp lett 65 * ( 1997 ) 615 ;wiedemann nucl b 2000 ) 303. gyulassy. levai. vitev nucl 594 2001 ) 371 x.. wang f. guo nucl 696 2001 ) 788 | 0.311492 | 1,832 | 927 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,367 | we consider structure - preserving methods for conservative systems , which rigorously replicate the conservation property yielding better numerical solutions . there , corresponding to the skew - symmetry of the differential operator , that of difference operators is essential to the discrete conservation law .
unfortunately , however , when we employ the standard central difference operator , the simplest one , the numerical solutions often suffer from undesirable spatial oscillations . in this letter
, we propose a novel `` average - difference method , '' which is tougher against such oscillations , and combine it with an existing conservative method .
theoretical and numerical analysis in the linear case show the superiority of the proposed method . | in this letter , we consider the numerical integration of the partial differential equation ( pde ) in the form @xmath0 where subscripts @xmath1 or @xmath2 denote the partial differentiation with respect to @xmath1 or @xmath2 , and @xmath3 is the variational derivative of @xmath4 .
we assume the periodic boundary condition @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is a constant .
when the derivatives of @xmath7 do not appear in @xmath8 , the equation is called the ( nonlinear ) klein gordon equation in light - cone coordinates .
moreover , the class of pdes in the form is closely related to the ostrovsky equation @xcite , the short pulse equation @xcite , etc . for their numerical treatments , due to the possible indefiniteness caused by the spatial derivative in the left - hand side , it seems a systematic numerical framework for is yet to be investigated , though a few exceptions for specific cases can be found ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . in this letter , we focus on a certain class of conservative methods . under the periodic boundary condition , the target equation has the conserved quantity @xmath8 : @xmath9^l_0 - \int^l_0 u_t u_{tx } { \mathrm{d}}x = - \int^l_0 u_t u_{tx } { \mathrm{d}}x = 0 .
\hspace{6pt } \label{eq_conservation}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that the skew - symmetry of the differential operator @xmath10 is crucial here .
a numerical scheme is called conservative when it replicates such a conservation property ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
the numerical solutions obtained by such schemes are often more stable than those of general - purpose methods . there , the crucial point for the discrete conservation law is the skew - symmetry of difference operator , which corresponds to that of the differential operator ; when one tries to construct a conservative finite - difference scheme for the equation , the differential operator @xmath11 in left - hand side must be replaced by one of the skew - symmetric difference operators , for example , the central difference operators , the compact finite difference operators ( see , e.g. , kanazawa matsuo yaghchi @xcite ) , and the fourier - spectral difference operator ( see , e.g. , fornberg @xcite ) .
this is intrinsically indispensable , at least to the best of the present authors knowledge .
this , however , at the same time , leads to an undesirable side effect that the numerical solutions tend to suffer from spatial oscillations . in this letter , to work around this technical difficulty , we propose a novel `` average - difference method , '' which is tough against such undesirable spatial oscillations .
a similar method has been , in fact , already investigated by nagisa @xcite . however , he used this method for advection - type equations , and concluded the method was unfortunately not more advantageous than existing methods .
in this letter , we instead construct an average - difference method for the pde , and combine it with the idea of conservation mentioned above .
then we compare the proposed and existing methods in the case of the linear klein gordon equation , which is the simplest case with @xmath12 . as a result ,
the average - difference type method is successfully superior to the existing methods in view of the phase speed of each frequency component .
the conservative scheme for the pde can be constructed in the spirit of discrete variational derivative method ( dvdm ) ( see , the monograph @xcite for details ) . there , one utilizes the concept of the `` discrete variational derivative '' and skew - symmetric difference operators . the symbol @xmath13 denotes the approximation @xmath14 , where @xmath15 and @xmath16 are the temporal and spatial mesh sizes , respectively . here
, we assume the discrete periodic boundary condition @xmath17 , and thus , we use the notation @xmath18 .
let us introduce the spatial central difference operator @xmath19 and the temporal forward difference operator @xmath20 : @xmath21 the discrete counterpart @xmath22 of the functional @xmath23 can be defined as @xmath24 where @xmath25 is an appropriate approximation of @xmath26 .
then , the discrete variational derivative @xmath27 is defined as a function satisfying @xmath28 for the construction of such one , see @xcite . by using the discrete variational derivative
, we can construct a conservative scheme @xmath29 as stated in the introduction , the key ingredient here is the skew - symmetry of the central difference operator .
suppose the numerical scheme has a solution @xmath13 under the periodic boundary condition .
then , it satisfies @xmath30 .
_ thanks to the definition of the discrete variational derivative , we can follow the line of the discussion as follows : @xmath31 whose right - hand side vanishes due to the skew - symmetry of the central difference operator @xmath19 : @xmath32 holds for any @xmath33 .
_ the discrete conservation law can also be proved similarly for the other skew - symmetric difference operators .
in this section , we propose the novel method . there , instead of the single skew - symmetric difference operator , we employ the pair of the forward difference and average operators : @xmath34 the average - difference method for the equation can be written in the form @xmath35 the name `` average - difference '' comes from the idea of approximating @xmath11 with the pair of @xmath36 ; this makes sense for more general pdes , and thus is independent of any conservation properties .
still , in this letter we focus on and .
although it is constructed in the spirit of dvdm , now the forward difference operator @xmath37 loses the apparent skew - symmetry , and accordingly , the proof of the discrete conservation law becomes unobvious .
a similar proof can be found in nagisa @xcite .
suppose the average - difference method has a solution @xmath13 under the periodic boundary condition .
then , it satisfies @xmath30 .
[ thm_dvdm_ad ] _ by using the definition of the discrete variational derivative , we see that @xmath38 here , for brevity , we introduce the notation @xmath39 note that the equation implies the relation @xmath40 . by using the identity @xmath41 which holds for any @xmath42
, we see @xmath43 which proves the theorem . _
in order to conduct a detailed analysis , we consider the simplest case , the linear klein gordon equation @xmath44 under the periodic domain with the period @xmath45 .
the exact solution of the linear klein gordon equation can be formally written in the form @xmath46 where @xmath47 is the imaginary unit , and @xmath48 is determined by the initial condition @xmath49 : @xmath50 in view of the superposition principle , we consider the single component @xmath51 ( @xmath52 ) . in order to clarify the difference between the standard conservative method and proposed method , we consider the following three semi - discretizations @xmath53 where @xmath54 for @xmath55 ( @xmath56 ) . here , @xmath57 denotes the fourier - spectral difference operator , i.e. , @xmath58 where @xmath59 is obtained by the discrete fourier transform : @xmath60 note that , the implicit midpoint method for the semi - discretizations above coincide with the numerical schemes constructed in the previous sections .
we consider the solution of the semi - discretizations above in the form @xmath61 ( @xmath62 ) for each @xmath63 , which gives an exact solutions of , , and with appropriate choices of @xmath64 .
for the central difference scheme , we see @xmath65 if we employ the fourier - spectral difference operator instead of the central difference , we see @xmath66 and @xmath67 holds for any @xmath63 . for the average - difference scheme ,
we obtain @xmath68 the phase speeds @xmath69 corresponding to each numerical scheme are summarized in fig .
[ fig_speed ] ( @xmath70 ) . as shown in fig .
[ fig_speed ] , the phase speed of the central difference scheme are falsely too fast for high frequency components ( @xmath71 ) . on the other hand ,
the error of the phase speeds of the average - difference method are much smaller .
( @xmath72 ) .
the red circles , blue crosses , and green triangles correspond to the average - difference , fourier - spectral difference , and central difference schemes , respectively . ] in this section , we conduct a numerical experiment under the periodic boundary condition @xmath73 with the initial condition @xmath74 the corresponding solution can be formally written in @xmath75 figures [ fig_step_cd ] , [ fig_step_ps ] , and [ fig_step_ad ] show the numerical solutions of the central difference scheme , the fourier - spectral difference scheme , and the average - difference method , respectively ( the temporal discretization : implicit midpoint method ) . as shown in fig .
[ fig_step_cd ] , the central difference scheme suffers from the spatial oscillation , whereas the other schemes reproduce the smooth profiles until @xmath76 .
the cause of this difference lies on the discrepancy in phase speeds of high frequency components ( fig .
[ fig_speed ] ) . , @xmath77 ) .
] , @xmath77 ) .
] , @xmath77 ) .
] however , as shown in fig .
[ fig_comp ] , which shows the numerical solutions of each schemes at @xmath78 , the fourier - spectral scheme also suffers from the undesirable spatial oscillation , whereas the proposed method , average - difference method reproduces a better profile .
moreover , the values of error @xmath79 at @xmath80 ( i.e. , @xmath81 ) for the numerical solutions of central difference scheme , fourier - spectral difference scheme , and the proposed method are @xmath82 , @xmath83 , and @xmath84 , respectively . this could be attributed to the fact that the fourier - spectral difference can be regarded as a higher - order central difference , and thus should share the same property to a certain extent .
( @xmath85 , @xmath77 ) .
the black dotted line represents the exact solution .
the green , blue , and red solid lines denote the numerical solution of the central difference scheme , the fourier - spectral difference scheme , and the average - difference method , respectively . ]
the results above can be extended in several ways . first , instead of the cumbersome proof in theorem [ thm_dvdm_ad ]
, we can introduce the concept of generalized skew - symmetry , by which a more sophisticated `` average - difference '' version of the dvdm could be given .
second , we should try more general pdes to see to which extent the new dvdm is advantageous .
finally and ultimately , we hope to construct a systematic numerical framework for ( 1 ) , based on the above observations .
the authors have already got some results on these issues , which will be reported somewhere soon .
this work was partly supported by jsps kakenhi grant numbers 25287030 , 26390126 , and 15h03635 , and by crest , jst .
the second author is supported by the jsps research fellowship for young scientists .
99 l. a. ostrovsky , nonlinear internal waves in the rotating ocean , okeanologia * 18 * ( 1978 ) , 181191 .
t. schfer and c. e. wayne , propagation of ultra - short optical pulses in cubic nonlinear media , phys .
d , * 196 * ( 2004 ) , 90105 .
t. yaguchi , t. matsuo and m. sugihara , conservative numerical schemes for the ostrovsky equation , j. comput .
, * 234 * ( 2010 ) , 10361048 . y. miyatake , t. yaguchi and t. matsuo , numerical integration of the ostrovsky equation based on its geometric structures , j. comput . phys . ,
* 231 * ( 2012 ) , 45424559 .
d. furihata and t. matsuo , discrete variational derivative method : a structure - preserving numerical method for partial differential equations , crc press , boca raton , 2011 .
e. celledoni , v. grimm , r. i. mclachlan , d. i. mclaren , d. oneale , b. owren and g. r. w. quispel , preserving energy resp .
dissipation in numerical pdes using the `` average vector field '' method , j. comput .
* 231 * ( 2012 ) , 67706789 .
h. kanazawa , t. matsuo and t. yaguchi , a conservative compact finite difference scheme for the kdv equation , jsiam letters * 4 * ( 2012 ) , 58 .
b. fornberg , a practical guide to pseudospectral methods , cambridge university press , cambridge , 1996 .
y. nagisa , finite difference schemes for pdes using shift operators ( in japanese ) , the university of tokyo , master s thesis , 2014 . | consider numerical integration partial differential equation ) in form @xmath0 subscripts @xmath1 or @xmath2 denote partial differentiation @xmath3 variational derivative of @xmath4 assume periodic boundary condition @xmath5 @xmath6 constant derivatives @xmath7 appear in @xmath8 equation called nonlinear ) klein gordon equation in light - cone coordinates class of pdes related to ostrovsky equation @xcite short pulse equation @xcite numerical treatments indefiniteness spatial derivative left - hand side systematic numerical framework yet to be investigated exceptions for specific cases @xcite focus on conservative methods periodic boundary condition target equation has conserved quantity @xmath8 : @xmath9^l_0 - \int^l_0 u_t{tx =_conservation skew - symmetry of differential operator @xmath10 crucial numerical scheme conservative replicates conservation property @xcite numerical solutions schemes more stable than general - purpose methodscrucial point for discrete conservation law is skew - symmetry of difference operator corresponds to differential operator conservative finite - difference scheme for differential operator @xmath11 left - must be replaced by skew - symmetric difference operators central difference operators compact finite difference operators fourier - spectral difference operator indispensable leads to undesirable side effect numerical solutions suffer from spatial oscillations propose novel `` average - difference method tough against undesirable spatial oscillations similar method investigated by nagisa @xcite used for advection - type equations not more advantageous than methods construct average - difference method for pde combine with idea of conservation compare proposed and existing methods in linear klein gordon equation @xmath12 average - difference method superior to existing methods in phase speed of each frequency component conservative scheme for pde can be constructed in spirit of discrete variational derivative method ( ) monograph for utilizes concept of discrete variational derivative '' and skew - symmetric difference operators symbol @xmath13 approximation @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 temporal spatial mesh sizes assume discrete periodic boundary condition @xmath17 use notation @xmath18 introduce spatial central difference operator @xmath19 temporal forward difference operator @xmath20 @xmath21 discrete counterpart @xmath22 functional @xmath23 defined @xmath24 @xmath25 approximation @xmath26 discrete variational derivative @xmath27 function satisfying @xmath28 discrete derivative construct conservative scheme @xmath29 key ingredient skew - symmetry central difference operator numerical scheme solution @xmath13 periodic boundary condition satisfies @xmath30 definition discrete variational derivative follow line discussion @xmath31 right - hand side vanishes due to skew - symmetry central difference operator @xmath19 @xmath32 holds for @xmath33 discrete conservation law proved other skew - difference operators propose novel method instead single skew employ pair forward difference average operators @xmath34 average - difference method written form @xmath35 average - difference from approximating @xmath11 with pair @xmath36 independent of conservation properties focus onconstructed dvdm forward difference operator @xmath37 loses skew - symmetry proof discrete conservation law unobvious similar proof in nagisa @xcite average - difference method solution @xmath13 under periodic boundary condition satisfies @xmath30 definition discrete variational derivative @xmath38 notation @xmath39 equation implies relation @xmath40 identity @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 proves theorem detailed analysis linear klein gordon equation @xmath44 under periodic domain period @xmath45 solution @xmath46 @xmath47 imaginary unit @xmath48 determined initial condition @xmath49 : @xmath50 superposition principle consider single component @xmath51 ( @xmath52 ) difference standard conservative method proposed method three semi - discretizations @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 fourier - spectral difference operator @xmath58 @xmath59 obtained by discrete fourier transform : @xmath60 implicit midpoint method semi - discretizations coincide with numerical schemes previous sectionsconsider solution semi - discretizations form @xmath61 ( @xmath62 ) each @xmath63 gives exact solutions , , appropriate choices @xmath64 central difference scheme see @xmath65 fourier - spectral difference operator @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath63 average - difference scheme obtain @xmath68 phase speeds @xmath69 each scheme summarized fig . [ fig_speed ] ( @xmath70 ) phase speed central difference scheme too fast high frequency components ( @xmath71 ) error phase speeds average - difference method smaller @xmath72 ) red circles blue crosses green triangles correspond average - difference fourier - spectral difference central difference schemes conduct numerical experiment periodic boundary condition @xmath73 initial condition @xmath74 solution written @xmath75 figures [ fig_step_cd_ps_ad show numerical solutions central difference scheme fourier - spectral difference scheme average - difference method central difference scheme suffers spatial oscillation other schemes reproduce smooth profiles until @xmath76 cause difference discrepancy phase speeds high frequency components_speed @xmath77@xmath77 ) in fig . numerical solutions at @xmath78 fourier - spectral scheme suffers from undesirable spatial oscillation proposed method average - difference method better profile values of error @xmath79 at @xmath80 @xmath81 ) for numerical solutions of central difference fourier - spectral difference scheme proposed method are @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 fourier - spectral difference higher - order central difference share same property @xmath85 , @xmath77 ) black dotted line represents exact solution green blue red solid lines denote numerical solution of central difference fourier - spectral difference average - difference method results can be extended introduce concept of generalized skew - symmetry sophisticated average - difference version dvdm try more general pdes to new dvdm construct systematic numerical framework for ( 1 ) based on observations authors results reported soon work supported by jsps kakenhi grant numbers 25287030 26390126 15h03635 crest , jst second author supported by jsps research fellowship for young scientistsostrovsky nonlinear waves rotating ocean okeanologia 18 1978 181191 schfer wayne propagation ultra - short optical pulses cubic nonlinear media phys 196 2004 90105 yaguchi matsuo sugihara conservative numerical schemes ostrovsky equation j comput 234 2010 ) 10361048 miyatake yaguchi matsuo numerical integration ostrovsky equation geometric structures 231 2012 45424559 furihata matsuo discrete variational derivative method structure - preserving numerical partial differential equations crc press boca raton 2011 celledoni grimm mclachlan mclaren oneale owren quispel preserving energy dissipation numerical pdes average vector field method comput 231 2012 67706789 kanazawa matsuo yaguchi conservative compact finite difference scheme kdv equation 4 2012 58 fornberg guide pseudospectral methods cambridge university press 1996 nagisa finite difference schemes pdes shift operators japanese university tokyo master s thesis 2014 | 0.437936 | 2,907 | 1,459 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,380 | we present a novel method to characterize the @xmath0 phase space at the ip of the slac b - factory , that combines single - beam measurements with a detailed mapping of luminous - region observables .
transverse spot sizes are determined in the two rings with synchrotron - light monitors and extrapolated to the ip using measured lattice functions .
the specific luminosity , which is proportional to the inverse product of the overlap ip beam sizes , is continuously monitored using radiative bhabha events .
the spatial variation of the luminosity and of the transverse - boost distribution of the colliding @xmath1 , are measured using @xmath2 events reconstructed in the detector .
the combination of these measurements provide constraints on the emittances , horizontal and vertical spot sizes , angular divergences and @xmath3 functions of both beams at the ip during physics data - taking .
preliminary results of this combined spot - size analysis are confronted with independent measurements of ip @xmath3-functions and overlap ip beam sizes at low beam current . | the detector @xcite is located at the interaction point ( ip ) of the 2 @xcite , where 3.1 @xmath4 positrons from the low - energy ring ( ler ) collide with 9.0 @xmath4 electrons from the high - energy ring ( her ) .
the ler has two beam profile monitors : a visible synchrotron - light monitor ( @xmath5 ) @xcite in a high - coupling region , and an x - ray monitor ( @xmath6 ) @xcite at a separate location .
the her is equipped with one @xmath7 . in both rings , the vertical beam size at the slm
is measured using a companion interferometer @xcite .
the tracking system is used to measure the three - dimensional distribution of @xmath8 vertices @xcite and the transverse - boost distribution @xcite of the muon pairs .
this paper describes a first attempt at characterizing the phase space of the colliding beams by combining all the available information .
the strategy is outlined in fig .
[ fig : outline ] . in each ring ,
profile - monitor data are combined with measured lattice functions to extract the eigenmode emittances @xmath9 and predict the @xmath1 ip spot sizes .
the z - dependence of the luminosity @xmath10 , of the luminous size @xmath11 and of the boost angular divergence @xmath12 allow the determination , under high - luminosity conditions , of the overlap bunch length @xmath13 and of the vertical emittances @xmath14 and effective ip @xmath3-function @xmath15 .
together with the measured specific luminosity @xmath16 , they also provide constraints on the horizontal emittances @xmath17 and @xmath3 functions @xmath18 .
each set of observables ( profile monitors , luminous - region data ) offers a nearly complete description of the ip phase space . comparing results for overlapping parameters
is used to validate the techniques or identify inconsistencies , and combining all measurements should eventually yield a complete , and partially constrained , description .
[ cols="<,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ tbl : capsigmaresults ] spot sizes were also recorded at somewhat higher currents . in the absence of collisions and with an @xmath19 current far below any potential @xmath20-cloud threshold
, the emittances should remain the same .
the observed values are comparable to the low - current results ( table [ tbl : characterisationdataprofileemittances ] ) . the increase in @xmath21 may be caused by thermal orbit distortions .
the already large horizontal her spot size appears to grow with current .
data recorded with high - current colliding beams exhibit a sizeable increase in the vertical @xmath6 and in both @xmath5 spot sizes , which is qualitatively consistent with the dynamic-@xmath3 effect and with beam - beam vertical blowup .
but the observed spot sizes result in inconsistent emittance estimates , presumably highlighting the fact that the additional focusing caused by the beam - beam interaction must imperatively be taken into account in the one - turn matrix .
the size of the luminous ellipsoid @xcite and the transverse - boost distribution @xcite of the colliding electron and positron are measured using @xmath8 events reconstructed in the detector .
the spatial variation of these observables is determined by the emittances , ip @xmath3-functions and waist locations of the colliding beams . in the horizontal plane ,
@xmath18 is much larger than the bunch lengths @xmath22 , so the horizontal beam parameters are only weakly apparent in the @xmath23-dependence of luminous - region variables .
but in the vertical plane , @xmath24 , resulting in an observable @xmath23-dependence of the luminosity , of the angular spread of the boost direction and of the vertical size of the luminous region . fitting an effective ip @xmath3-function to the first two observables and neglecting @xmath25-@xmath26 coupling yields similar results , in the range of 1216 mm @xcite ; fits to @xmath27 yield somewhat higher values , but with larger systematic uncertainties .
an effective vertical emittance can then be extracted from @xmath28 ; the more powerful boost technique allows to determine both the her and ler emittances , yielding @xmath292.59@xmath30-@xmath31 ( again under the no - coupling assumption ) @xcite . combining the emittance and @xmath32 results from the boost measurement yields estimates of @xmath33 in the range of 710@xmath34 m , that displays the expected anticorrelation with the specific luminosity ( fig .
[ fig : capsigyvlsp ] ) . because @xmath35 , the slope of this correlation provides a measurement of @xmath36 .
( boost method ) and @xmath16 measured by the bhabha luminosity monitor .
, width=220 ] further combining @xmath36 with the horizontal luminous size @xmath37 @xcite determines both @xmath19 and @xmath20 horizontal ip spot sizes ( fig .
[ fig : babarx ] ) .
these are then finally combined with the horizontal - boost angular spread @xmath38 and the horizontal angle - position correlation @xmath39 @xcite to extract @xmath40 .
the reduction in horizontal spot size caused by the dynamic-@xmath3 effect is strikingly apparent .
the value of @xmath41 extracted from data before the move to the half - integer , is consistent with low - current phase advance measurements recorded at that time . in the same period
however , the corresponding @xmath42 result is significantly smaller than the phase - advance measurements .
in addition , the horizontal ler emittance implied by fig .
[ fig : babarx ] is surprisingly large , possibly signaling an inconsistency in this preliminary analysis .
functions ( bottom ) in the ler ( open circles ) and the her ( black dots ) , extracted from luminous - region observables measured by .
the dotted line indicates the time when both @xmath25 tunes were moved close to the half - integer , resulting in a sizeable luminosity improvement.,width=307 ]
confronting ip beam sizes extrapolated from the profile monitors with a detailed phase - space characterization based on luminous - region observables would provide invaluable consistency checks , as well as restrict systematic uncertainties .
two main ingredients are required to this effect .
first , beam - beam focusing needs to be taken into account in the one - turn matrix of ref .
@xcite ; guidance can be provided here by beam - beam simulations .
second , @xmath25-@xmath26 coupling at the ip needs to be incorporated in the luminous - region analyses , as its impact has recently been shown @xcite to be significant . | detector @xcite at interaction point 2 3.1 @xmath4 positrons low - energy ring collide with 9.0 @xmath4 electrons high - energy ring ler has two beam monitors synchrotron - light monitor @xmath5 x - ray monitor @xmath6 separate her one @xmath7 vertical beam size slm measured using companion interferometer @xcite tracking system three - distribution @xmath8 vertices transverse - boost distribution muon pairs paper describes characterizing phase space colliding beams combining information strategy outlined in fig . profile - monitor data combined with measured lattice functions extract eigenmode emittances @xmath9 predict @xmath1 ip spot sizes z - dependence luminosity @xmath10 luminous size @xmath11 boost angular divergence @xmath12 allow determination overlap bunch length @xmath13 vertical emittances @xmath14 effective ip @xmath3-function @xmath15 luminosity constraints on horizontal emittances @xmath17 functions @xmath18 each set observables complete description ip phase space comparing results for overlapping parameters techniques inconsistencies combining measurements complete descriptioncols="^",options="header tbl capsigmaresults spot sizes recorded at higher currents collisions @xmath19 current below @xmath20-cloud threshold emittances same values comparable to low - current results table increase in @xmath21 by thermal orbit distortions large horizontal spot size with current high - current colliding beams increase in vertical @xmath6 @xmath5 spot sizes consistent with dynamic-@xmath3 effect beam - beam vertical blowup spot sizes inconsistent emittance estimates additional focusing beam - beam interaction matrix size luminous ellipsoid @xcite transverse - boost distribution of colliding electron positron measured using @xmath8 events spatial variation determined by emittances @xmath3-functions waist locations colliding beams horizontal plane @xmath18 larger than lengths @xmath22 horizontal beam parameters apparent in @xmath23-dependence luminous - region variables vertical plane @xmath24 observable @xmath23-dependence of luminosity angular boost direction vertical size luminous regionfitting @xmath3-function first two observables neglecting @xmath25-@xmath26 coupling yields similar results 1216 mm fits @xmath27 yield higher values larger uncertainties vertical emittance extracted from @xmath28 powerful boost technique her ler emittances yielding @xmath292.59@xmath30-@xmath31 no - coupling assumption combining emittance @xmath32 yields estimates @xmath33 710@xmath34 m anticorrelation with luminosity @xmath35 slope correlation provides measurement @xmath36 @xmath16 measured bhabha luminosity monitor combining @xmath36 with horizontal luminous size @xmath37 determines @xmath19 @xmath20 horizontal ip spot sizes combined with horizontal - boost angular spread @xmath38 horizontal angle - position correlation @xmath39 extract @xmath40 reduction in horizontal spot size dynamic-@xmath3 effect apparent value of @xmath41 before half - integer consistent with low - current phase advance measurements @xmath42 result smaller than phase - advance measurements horizontal ler emittance large signaling inconsistency preliminary analysisfunctions bottom ler open circles her black dots extracted from luminous - region observables dotted line indicates @xmath25 tunes moved close to half - integer luminosity improvement confronting ip beam sizes profile monitors with detailed phase - space characterization luminous - region observables consistency checks systematic uncertainties two ingredients required beam - beam focusing in one - turn matrix ref @xcite guidance simulations @xmath25-@xmath26 coupling at ip in luminous - region analyses impact significant | 0.262168 | 1,485 | 755 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,385 | we report on calculations of the total gravitational energy radiated in the head - on black hole collision , where we use the geometry of the robinson - trautman metrics .
pacs numbers : 04.30.db , 04.25.-g , 04.25.dm , 04.70.bw | accurate description of the dynamics of relativistic gravitating systems remains one of the challenging problems in general relativity .
there is great interest in particular on the description of systems involving very compact objects , as for example black holes .
it is expected that these kind of systems will be describable in terms of an appropriate isolated model ; which in a relativistic theory of gravity is expressed by an asymptotically flat spacetime . in this description
the gravitational radiated energy will be encoded in the behavior of the physical field at future null infinity . in numerical calculations
these ideas have been used in attacking the problem of the time symmetric asymptotically flat initial data corresponding to a two equal mass black hole system@xcite@xcite .
it would be nice to be able to compare these calculations with some analytic solution of the field equation ; but in trying to do this one is faced with the fact that there is up to now only one known vacuum asymptotically flat radiating family of solutions , the so called robinson - trautman metrics@xcite .
these spacetimes represent the dynamics of a single black hole which settles down , in the asymptotic future@xcite , to the schwarzschild geometry . in the process of two black holes falling into each other in a head - on collision
, one can distinguish two natural eras : one in which the two black holes are separated and falling , and the other in which they already form a single black hole which is decaying to a stationary state .
since the robinson - trautman metrics represent a black hole , one could estimate the total gravitational radiation emitted after the formation of the black hole using these geometries . in doing
this one needs to associate the data of the two black hole collision system to the robinson - trautman data .
we do this by matching , at an arbitrary retarded time , the radiation content of these metrics with the radiation calculated from the quadruple formula with newtonian dynamics at the moment of collapse .
let us consider the newtonian problem of two particles of mass @xmath0 , which start at rest at an initial distance @xmath1 .
one can estimate the power of the energy carried away by gravitational waves when they are at a distance d assuming newtonian dynamics and the quadrupole approximation . more specifically ; the quadrupole radiation formula relates the power of the energy radiated with the time derivatives of the quadrupole : @xmath2 where @xmath3 @xmath4 and we are using geometric units in which the newton s gravitational constant and the speed of light have the unit value .
then , the total power radiated is @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the total mechanical mass and d the distance at observation .
in a previous paper@xcite it was found the general asymptotic behavior of the robinson - trautman metrics in the asymptotic future .
the leading behavior of these metrics is governed by the quadrupole structure of the spacetime .
more explicitly , the whole geometry of these metrics is determined by a scalar @xmath7 , where u , can be considered a retarded time and @xmath8 the coordinates of a 2-sphere . according to ref .
@xcite , for an axisymmetric quadrupole structure , the asymptotic behavior of this scalar , for @xmath9 is @xmath10 where a is a constant @xmath11 is the asymptotic mass of the spacetime in the regime @xmath9 , and @xmath12 is a spherical harmonic function .
this geometry undoubtedly represents the dynamics of a single black hole ; which becomes evident when in the limit for @xmath9 , i.e. , v=1 , one recognizes the schwarzschild metric . as we have described above , there are two natural eras in the process of the head - on collision : before and after the formation of the remaining black hole .
since the robinson - trautman geometries describe the dynamics of a single black hole , it is natural to try to study , with these geometries , the final stage of the process .
the time derivative of the bondi shear of the robinson - trautman sections of future null infinity has the following asymptotic behavior : @xmath13 where now @xmath14 is a spin weight 2 spherical harmonic function and @xmath15 means higher order terms of the time exponential . with this information
one can calculate the flux of gravitational bondi radiation at future null infinity in first order , obtaining : @xmath16 to relate the robinson - trautman geometry with the problem of the head - on collision of two black holes , we identify the bondi power at some retarded time with the power calculated from the quadrupole formula at the moment when the two black holes touch ; that is when @xmath17 . in this way
we determine a appearing in the above formulae . with the bondi flux
one can calculate in first order the total energy radiated , namely : @xmath18 let @xmath19 denote de mass of the spacetime at the _ initial _ retarded time ; then one has the relation @xmath20 therefore , the ratio radiation over initial mass , can be expressed by @xmath21 identifying the bondi with the quadrupole flux one would obtain @xmath22 with @xmath23 and @xmath24 . in this expression
we identify m with @xmath19 ; that is we map the newtonian total mass to the total mass of the spacetime at the initial retarded time .
in reference @xcite it was presented the initial data corresponding to a time symmetric 2-black hole system . there
the adm mass @xmath25 was calculated , and a magnitude @xmath26 ( there denoted with capital l ) was defined , having the interpretation of some measure of initial distance between the black holes .
more precisely @xmath26 was defined as the length of the minimal line from the `` ring '' at minimum radius from one throat to the respective `` ring '' in the other throat .
if one wants to compare calculations coming from different realizations of the same physical situation , namely the head - on collision of two equal mass black holes , one must provide a relation between the physical quantities involved .
the two fundamental physical quantities involved in this situation are the total mass of the system and the separation of the black holes . as we have done in the previous section ,
the identification of the masses is straight forward , since the natural thing to do is to identify the invariantly defined total masses in each case .
there remains however the relation among the notion of distance involved in each case .
the question is : is there a natural way to identify the misner magnitude @xmath26 with the newtonian notion of distance appearing in the estimates of the total gravitational energy radiated using the quadrupole formula approach ?
a simple identification of @xmath26 with d would be too naive in the regime of small distances .
we seek then for some relation between @xmath26 and d such that it captures the most important physical aspects of both systems . in order to do this
let us recall that in reference @xcite the time symmetric initial data for a two equal mass black hole system was represented by the 3-geometry : @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the line element of a flat 3-geometry , @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the euclidean distances from the field point to the deleted points in the flat 3-geometry which represent the location of the first and second black hole respectively , and @xmath31 and @xmath32 are parameters which characterize the spacetime . if in the conformal , scalar appearing in the above line element , one eliminates the third term , the constant time schwarzschild line element is obtained , with mass @xmath31 expressed in terms of isotropic coordinates .
according to the arguments of reference @xcite the mass of , let us say , the first black hole is @xmath33 where now @xmath34 is the euclidean distance between the black holes ; while the total mass of the spacetime is @xmath35 this expression agrees with the first relativistic correction to the newtonian total mass ; since in first order one has @xmath36 therefore it seems that the newtonian distance , for large @xmath37 , should be identified with the coordinate distance of the flat 3-geometry of the time symmetric problem .
so using the line element @xmath38 shown above for the region between the black holes , and identifying the radius of each black hole with double their respective masses , we define the distance between the black holes by @xmath39 which in terms of the total mass m for a two equal mass system can be expressed by @xmath40 then , defining @xmath41 and @xmath42 one has the relation @xmath43 it is observed that with respect of this variable , the black holes do not touch exactly at @xmath44 but when @xmath45 ; which corresponds to @xmath46 .
this picture is in agreement with the numerical calculations since it is found in reference @xcite that for @xmath47 a common apparent horizon surrounds both holes . which corresponds to our @xmath47 .
] we relate d to the misner magnitude @xmath26 by setting @xmath48 .
one can estimate an upper limit for the total energy radiated away in the form of gravitational waves when two very separated black holes collide , from the area theorem ; which using the relation between total mass and single black hole mass shown above and in terms of the quantities already defined , establishes that @xmath49
in ref . @xcite the numerical calculation of the total energy radiated for the time symmetric head - on collision of two equal mass black holes was reported .
they improved previous calculations @xcite with the help of latest generation of supercomputers , and further developed analytic and numerical techniques . in the next graph
we plot their recent@xcite data , our robinson - trautman ( rt ) estimate for the total energy radiated and the upper limit from the area theorem . and @xmath50 respectively .
the vertical bar at approximately @xmath51 corresponds to the region where a single black hole is formed .
the rt estimate is plotted in terms of the relation @xmath52 explained in the main text.,width=377,height=226 ] it can be observed that the rt estimate keeps bellow the supercomputer data ; but this is no surprise since one had expected to only estimate , by this mean , the total energy radiated after the formation of the resulting black hole .
the energy radiated in the first stage , when the black holes fall from @xmath1 to @xmath37 , before the formation of the resulting black hole , can be estimated from the quadrupole formula and using the newtonian dynamics ; that is @xmath53 from which it is deduced that @xmath54 with @xmath55 , @xmath56 and m is the total mass of the system . then adding to the rt estimate the quadrupole newtonian estimate one obtains the total energy radiated during the entire process in the quadrupole approximation , which is shown in the next graph .
this remarkable agreement between our estimates and the supercomputer calculations allows one to think that the global quantities , as the total energy radiated , for a gravitating system like the one under consideration , is not very dependent on the model realization of the system ; since , in particular , the robinson - trautman approach is not time symmetric .
therefore the supercomputer results obtained from the time symmetric two black holes head - on collision system might have a wider range of validity than the one assumed up to now .
it is important to note that our estimates can be calculated for values of l corresponding to distance over mass relation above the threshold of the formation of the remaining black hole ; which from reference @xcite it is deduced to be around l=2.49 .
so our estimates are complementary of those calculated in reference @xcite in which , using a completely different approach , they have estimated with high precision the total energy radiated for small l ; while their method overestimates the total energy in two orders of magnitude in the vicinity of @xmath57 ( which correspond to their @xmath58 ) .
the total gravitational energy radiated in the large separation regime was represented through semianalytic method in reference @xcite by their equation ( 6 ) .
the approach followed in that reference requires of a series of extrapolation in the applicability of known equations .
first of all they use an equation for the total energy radiated calculated in the test particle limit@xcite ( eq .
( 1 ) ) ; that is , one mass much smaller that the other mass ( @xmath59 ) falling from infinity , and then they extrapolate the equation to the equal mass case ( @xmath60 ) .
this approach needs from several correcting factors . using an altered quadrupole radiation formula they suggest a correcting factor , appearing in their eq .
( 4 ) , that takes into account the effects associated to the fact that the infall is not from infinity but from a finite distance .
the alteration in the quadrupole formula comes from a substitution of the radial velocity by a `` nonunique '' of reference @xcite . ]
it is observed that the integral in their eq .
( 4 ) is calculated up to the upper limit @xmath61 , which is consistent with the test particle limit approach , but it overestimates the total gravitational energy radiation in the equal mass case .
therefore they have to introduce another correcting factor smaller than one , there called @xmath62 , which is intended to take into account the black hole structure of both objects . these points were also studied in references @xcite and @xcite .
it is important to emphasize that we use , without alterations , the quadrupole radiation formula for the first stage before the collision , up to the point in which the two horizons touch each other ( @xmath63 ) ; this in contrast to the case of a test particle crossing one horizon ( @xmath64 ) .
then , in order to take into account the black hole structure of the remaining object we use the robinson - trautman geometry , which radiation is to be added to the quadrupole estimate ; this in contrast to the reducing factor @xmath62 . the present estimate of the total gravitational energy radiated is based on a couple of simple ideas with direct physical interpretation ; which is a contribution to the understanding of the global aspects of the head - on black hole collision .
it would be interesting to reproduce these calculations taken into account post - newtonian techniques , as those used in reference @xcite , to see whether these effects will make any substantial difference to our calculations .
a question that motivated us for this work was how a global quantity , as the total energy radiated , could be dependent on the details of the modeling of a physical situation .
on purpose we use a completely different approach , and the result is that this global quantity does not appear to be very dependent on the details of the modeling . as a final comment
let us point out that since the time symmetric initial data obviously incorporates incoming radiation in the system , it is important to be able to know whether this incoming radiation will have an important contribution to the outgoing radiation . since the robinson - trautman geometry can be considered to represent pure outgoing radiating spacetimes , and also the quadrupole estimate only takes into account retarded fields , the agreement of our estimates with the numerical calculations , of the time symmetric problem , suggests that the incoming radiation contribution to the outgoing one is negligible .
it is a pleasure to thank richard price for a series of illuminating discussions , for pointing out to us reference @xcite and for a detailed exposition of their work .
we are also very grateful to peter anninos and collaborators for sending us their recent calculations . | description dynamics of relativistic gravitating systems challenging in relativity interest on description systems compact objects black holes expected these systems describable in isolated model in relativistic theory gravity expressed by asymptotically flat spacetime gravitational radiated energy encoded in behavior physical field at future null infinity numerical calculations ideas used problem time symmetric asymptotically flat initial data two equal mass black hole system compare calculations with analytic solution field equation one known vacuum asymptotically flat radiating family of solutions robinson - trautman metrics@xcite spacetimes represent dynamics of single black hole settles down to schwarzschild geometry two black holes falling collision distinguish two natural eras holes separated falling single black hole decaying to stationary state robinson - trautman metrics represent black hole estimate total gravitational radiation emitted after formation black hole using geometries associate data of two black hole collision system to robinson - trautman data by matching radiation content of metrics with radiation calculated from quadruple formula with newtonian dynamics at moment of collapseconsider newtonian problem two particles mass @xmath0 start rest initial distance @xmath1 estimate power energy by gravitational waves distance d assuming newtonian dynamics quadrupole approximation quadrupole radiation formula relates power energy radiated with time derivatives quadrupole @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 geometric units newton s gravitational constant speed light unit value total power radiated @xmath5 @xmath6 total mechanical mass distance at observation previous paper asymptotic behavior robinson - trautman metrics asymptotic future governed by quadrupole structure spacetime geometry metrics determined by scalar @xmath7 u retarded time @xmath8 coordinates 2-sphere axisymmetric quadrupole structure asymptotic behavior scalar @xmath9 @xmath10 a constant @xmath11 asymptotic mass spacetime @xmath12 spherical harmonic function geometry represents dynamics of single black hole evident limit for @xmath9 v=1 recognizes schwarzschild metric two natural eras head - on collision before after formation remaining black holerobinson - trautman geometries describe dynamics single black hole study final stage process time derivative of bondi shear future null infinity asymptotic behavior : @xmath13 @xmath14 spin weight 2 spherical harmonic function @xmath15 means higher order terms time exponential calculate flux gravitational bondi radiation at future null infinity @xmath16 relate geometry head - on collision of two black holes identify bondi power retarded time with power calculated from quadrupole formula two black holes touch @xmath17 determine formulae bondi flux calculate total energy radiated @xmath18 @xmath19 denote de mass spacetime at initial retarded time relation @xmath20 ratio radiation over initial mass expressed by @xmath21 identifying bondi with quadrupole flux @xmath22 @xmath23 and @xmath24 identify m with @xmath19 map newtonian total mass to total mass spacetime at initial retarded time initial data time symmetric 2-black hole system adm mass @xmath25 calculated magnitude @xmath26 l defined measure initial distance between black holes length of minimal line from ring '' radius one throat to other throatcompare calculations from different realizations same physical situation head - on collision of two equal mass black holes relation between physical quantities involved two fundamental quantities total mass system separation of black holes identification of masses straight forward invariantly defined total masses remains relation among distance question identify misner magnitude @xmath26 with newtonian distance in estimates total gravitational energy quadrupole formula approach ? simple identification of @xmath26 with d naive small distances seek relation between @xmath26 and d important physical aspects systems recall time symmetric initial data for two equal mass black hole system represented by 3-geometry : @xmath27 @xmath28 line element of flat 3-geometry @xmath29 @xmath30 euclidean distances from field point to deleted points 3-geometry location of first and second black hole @xmath31 @xmath32 parameters characterize spacetime scalar eliminates third term constant time schwarzschild line element obtained with mass @xmath31 expressed in isotropic coordinatesarguments reference @xcite mass of first black hole is @xmath33 @xmath34 euclidean distance between black holes total mass spacetime @xmath35 agrees with first relativistic correction newtonian total mass first order @xmath36 newtonian distance @xmath37 identified with coordinate distance flat 3-geometry time symmetric problem using line element @xmath38 region between black holes radius each black hole masses define distance black holes by @xmath39 total mass m two equal mass system expressed by @xmath40 defining @xmath41 @xmath42 relation @xmath43 black holes touch at @xmath44 @xmath45 corresponds to @xmath46 agreement with numerical calculations @xmath47 common horizon surrounds both holes corresponds @xmath47 relate misner magnitude @xmath26 setting @xmath48 estimate upper limit total energy radiated gravitational waves when two black holes collide theorem relation between total mass single black hole mass quantities establishes @xmath49 @xcite numerical calculation total energy radiated for time symmetric collision of two equal mass black holes improved calculations supercomputers developed analytic numerical techniquesnext graph recent@xcite data robinson - trautman rt estimate total energy radiated upper limit area theorem @xmath50 vertical bar at @xmath51 corresponds region single black hole formed rt estimate plotted relation @xmath52 text rt estimate keeps bellow supercomputer data no surprise expected estimate total energy radiated after formation black hole energy radiated first stage black holes fall @xmath1 to @xmath37 before formation black hole estimated from quadrupole formula newtonian dynamics @xmath53 deduced @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 m total mass system adding to rt estimate quadrupole newtonian estimate obtains total energy radiated entire process quadrupole approximation shown next graph agreement between estimates supercomputer calculations global quantities total energy radiated for gravitating system not dependent on model realization robinson - trautman approach not time symmetric supercomputer results time symmetric two black holes head - on collision system might have wider range validity estimates calculated for values l corresponding distance over mass relation above threshold formation remaining black hole deduced around l=2.49 .our estimates complementary @xcite different approach they estimated high precision total energy radiated for small l their method overestimates total energy two orders magnitude vicinity @xmath57 their @xmath58 ) total gravitational energy radiated large separation regime represented by equation ( 6 ) approach requires extrapolation known equations use equation for total energy radiated test particle limit@xcite 1 ) ) one mass smaller other mass @xmath59 ) from infinity extrapolate equation to equal mass case ( @xmath60 ) needs correcting factors altered quadrupole radiation formula suggest correcting factor eq . ( 4 ) effects infall not from infinity finite distance alteration from substitution radial velocity by nonunique reference @xcite integral in eq . ( 4 ) calculated up to upper limit @xmath61 overestimates total gravitational energy in equal mass case correcting factor smaller @xmath62 black hole structure of both objects points studied in references @xcite and @xcite .important emphasize use without alterations quadrupole radiation formula for first stage before collision up to two horizons touch ( @xmath63 ) contrast to test particle crossing one horizon ( @xmath64 ) account black hole structure use robinson - trautman geometry radiation added to quadrupole estimate contrast to reducing factor @xmath62 present estimate of total gravitational energy radiated based on simple ideas direct physical interpretation contribution to understanding global aspects head - on black hole collision interesting reproduce calculations post - newtonian techniques used reference @xcite see effects substantial difference calculations question global quantity total energy radiated dependent on details modeling physical situation use different approach result global quantity not dependent on details modeling time symmetric initial data incorporates incoming radiation important to know radiation important contribution to outgoing radiation robinson - trautman geometry pure outgoing radiating spacetimes quadrupole estimate retarded fields agreement estimates with numerical calculations time symmetric problem suggests incoming radiation contribution to outgoing negligible thank richard price for illuminating discussions pointing reference @xcite detailed exposition of workgrateful to peter anninos collaborators recent calculations | 0.566806 | 3,337 | 1,699 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,386 | the flow structure in magnetic cataclysmic variables was investigated taking into account the effects of strong magnetic field and fast rotation of the white dwarf .
we modeled the ae aqr system as a unique object that has the rotation period of the white dwarf is about 1000 times shorter than the orbital period of the binary system .
observations show that in spite of fast rotation of the white dwarf some part of the stream from the inner lagrange point comes into the roche lobe region .
we analyzed possible mechanisms preventing material to outflow from the system . | magnetic cataclysmic variables ( mcvs ) are close binary stars , consisting of the donor star ( red dwarf ) and magnetized accreting star ( white dwarf ) @xcite .
generally mcvs can be divided into polars and intermediate polars according to the magnitude of their magnetic fields .
some mcvs have the extremely fast - rotating white dwarf .
they have the special place in this division .
it is called superpropellers @xcite .
we can find the intensive outflow of material from these systems because of the additional angular momentum from the rotating magnetosphere to the material . in this case
the accretion disk is not formed .
the possible representative object of superpropellers is ae aqr .
the analysis @xcite has shown that the most part of the strange behavior of this system can be connected with the superpropeller regime of the white dwarf .
on the other hand , the observational data show that , despite the very fast rotation of the magnetosphere in this system , some part of the flow from the inner lagrange point @xmath0 retains in the roche lobe of the accretor . in this paper
we analyze possible physical mechanisms that can reduce the transfer efficiency of the additional angular momentum from the rotating magnetosphere to the material .
the parameters of the system under consideration were adopted from @xcite and correspond to ae aqr .
the donor star has mass @xmath1 and effective temperature @xmath2 k. the accretor star has mass @xmath3 and effective temperature @xmath4 k. the orbital rotation period is @xmath5 h and the orbital separation is @xmath6 .
the estimated magnetic field on the white dwarf surface is @xmath7 mg . one more important characteristic is the proper rotation period @xmath8 s of the white dwarf .
we use the cartesian coordinate system ( @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 ) rotating with the orbital angular velocity @xmath12 around the center of mass of the binary system .
we assume that the accreting star has a proper dipolar magnetic field . in the case of asynchronous rotation of the accretor
its magnetic field @xmath13 depends on time , but it is potential : @xmath14 .
we can split the total magnetic field @xmath15 into the background field @xmath13 of the accretor and the field @xmath16 induced by currents in the gas dynamic flows , @xmath17 .
we describe the flow structure using the following equations @xcite : @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20,\ ] ] @xmath21 = n^2 \left ( \gamma - \lambda \right ) + \frac{\eta}{4 \pi } \left ( \nabla \times { \bf b } \right)^2,\ ] ] where @xmath22 is the density , @xmath23 the velocity , @xmath24 the pressure , @xmath25 the roche potential , @xmath26 the velocity of the magnetic field lines , @xmath27 the entropy per unit mass , @xmath28 the number density , @xmath29 the proton mass , @xmath30 the magnetic diffusivity .
the dependencies of the radiative heating @xmath31 and cooling @xmath32 functions on the temperature @xmath33 are complicated ( see @xcite for details ) .
the density , entropy , and pressure are related by the equation of state of an ideal gas : @xmath34 , where @xmath35 is the specific heat capacity of the gas at constant volume and @xmath36 is the adiabatic index .
note that our model was developed for the simulation of plasma flows in strong background magnetic fields .
it is based on the averaged characteristics of plasma flow in the frame of the wave mhd turbulence @xcite . in our approximation
the influence of the magnetic field of the accretor @xmath37 is described by the force @xmath38 ( see eq . ): @xmath39 where @xmath40 corresponds to the specific time of the penetration of the magnetic field into plasma and @xmath41 denotes components of velocity perpendicular to @xmath42 .
we use 3d parallel mhd code for the numerical simulations @xcite . in the fig .
[ fg1 ] we present the results of 3d simulations in the frame of the basic model for two values of magnetic field induction of the accretor . in this approximation
the rotation of the white dwarf is so fast that there is no accretion in the system .
the flowing material is just captured by the rotating magnetosphere of the accretor , acquires additional angular momentum and flows away from the roche lobe .
the results show that in the frame of the basic model the material does nt remain in the roche lobe of the accretor even in the case of a relatively weak magnetic field .
the similar results for the ae aqr were also received by other authors in the frame of the quasi - particle method @xcite .
let us investigate the behavior of the stream in the vicinity of the inner lagrange point @xmath0 in the ballistic approximation .
the similar analysis was done by lubow and shu @xcite for the non - magnetic case .
therefore we use their approach but taking into account the magnetic field and rotation of the accretor . the formal basis for this assumption is a supersonic flow pattern , that allows us to neglect the effects of pressure . for this purpose we can use only the equation of motion . in the vicinity of the inner lagrange point @xmath0
this equation can be rewritten in the following form : @xmath43 the left panel of fig .
[ fg2 ] shows the trajectories of test particles obtained in the ballistic approximation in the vicinity of the inner lagrange point @xmath0 for different magnetic fields .
the test particles trajectory in pure hydrodynamic case is in agreement with the corresponding results of lubow and shu @xcite .
the other trajectories for the case of the non - zero magnetic field confirm the results of our 3d mhd simulations .
for the weak magnetic field ( @xmath44 mg ) the trajectories are not strongly different from the non - magnetic case .
but in the case of strong magnetic fields ( @xmath45 mg ) the trajectories significantly deviate from the pure hydrodynamic trajectory and for @xmath46 mg even do not come to the roche lobe of the white dwarf .
our calculations show that for the widely adopted parameters of the magnetic field in the ae aqr system the material almost immediately flows away from the roche lobe of the white dwarf .
so we need to consider some physical mechanisms keeping material in the roche lobe .
one of the mechanisms can be connected with the partial ionization of plasma .
in fact , in the case of very week degree of ionization we should obtain the hydrodynamic solution when an accretion disk forms in the system . in the case of partial ionization of plasma the effect of ambipolar diffusion can be very effective
. the correspondent solution should be intermediate between pure hydrodynamic and ideal mhd ones . after some simple manipulations we can obtain the following expression for averaged electromagnetic force acting on plasma from the external magnetic field : @xmath47 where @xmath48 is the unit vector along the external magnetic field @xmath42
, @xmath49 @xmath50 describes larmor frequency for protons , @xmath9 is the degree of ionization , @xmath51 characteristic time between collisions of ions with neutrals .
analysis of the corresponding solutions shows that the effect of ambipolar diffusion can play an important role in the system for very low degrees of ionization in a range from @xmath52 to @xmath53 .
but the estimation of the equilibrium degree of ionization from the saha equation gives values in a range from @xmath54 to @xmath55 in the inner lagrange point @xmath0 of the system ae aqr .
so this mechanism does nt work in the considered system .
the other mechanism can be connected with relativistic effects in the system due to the very fast rotation of the accretor . to estimate these possible effects we should consider the electromagnetic field of the rotating magnetic dipole in the vacuum .
the corresponding solution of maxwell equations in the laboratory rest frame can be written in the form : @xmath56 @xmath57 + \frac{1}{r^2 c } \left [ 3 { \bf n } \left ( { \bf n } \cdot \dot{{\bf m } } \right ) - \dot{{\bf m } } \right ] + \frac{1}{r c^2 } \left [ { \bf n } \times \left ( { \bf n } \times \ddot{{\bf m } } \right ) \right],\ ] ] where @xmath58 and @xmath59 is the vector of magnetic moment . the characteristic spatial scale for the electromagnetic field , is the light radius @xmath60 . in the ae aqr system the boundary of the light cylinder is located farther than the inner lagrange point but closer than the center of the donor .
so the relativistic effects actually can play an important role in this system .
we can consider the pressure of the magneto - dipole radiation as one of the mechanisms that can keep the material in the roche lobe of the accretor . to include this effect we should add the corresponding force determined by the last terms in eqs . and into our numerical model .
but simple estimations show that in our case in the lagrange point @xmath0 this force is about @xmath61@xmath62 times smaller than the gravitational force of the accretor .
therefore we can neglect this effect , too .
another relativistic effect is the retard of rotating magnetic field lines .
in fact , in relativistic case the electromagnetic field of the rotating magnetic dipole , is determined by the magnetic moment @xmath63 at a retarded time @xmath64 .
in particular , this means that the magnetic field lines rotate not like a solid body .
the retard effect increases with the distance from the acrretor . at the boundary of the light cylinder the velocity of the field lines rotation equals the speed of light @xmath65 . therefore outside the light cylinder the magnetic field in exact solution
can not transfer effectively the angular momentum to the material . in our model
we can describe roughly this effect using an empirical dependence for angular velocity of magnetic lines on radius . the right panel of the fig .
[ fg2 ] shows a result of calculations in the ballistic approximation in the case of exponential dependence for angular velocity of magnetic lines rotation on radius .
it is seen that in the frame of this approach we can easy find the model parameters when the sufficient part of material stays in the roche lobe of the white dwarf .
the results of 3d simulations are shown in fig .
the figure demonstrates the distribution of the density and the velocity field in the equatorial plane of the binary system .
we can see that at initial stage ( left panel of fig .
[ fg3 ] ) the inflowing material forms a ring around the accretor . the gradual accumulation of material in the ring leads to increase of the pressure gradient .
therefore the subsequent evolution leads to the transformation of the original ring into a disk . at a particular time moment ( right panel of fig .
[ fg3 ] ) the material overfills the roche lobe and quasi - periodical overflows begin .
so , the relativistic retard of rotating magnetic field lines can be considered as an effective mechanism for retention of material in the roche lobe of the accretor in mcvs with fast rotating magnetized white dwarfs .
in this work we investigate the flow structure in mcvs taking into account the effects of strong magnetic field and fast rotation of the white dwarf .
the ae aqr system is considered as an example .
we analyzed possible physical mechanisms that can prevent the material to outflow from the binary system . among these mechanisms
are the ambipolar diffusion , the pressure of magneto - dipole radiation and the relativistic retard of rotating magnetic field lines .
our analysis has shown that the last mechanism can be the most effective .
both ballistic calculations and mhd 3d simulations show the formation of fairly stable ring - like structures around the accretor in the ae aqr system caused by presence of the relativistic retard of rotating magnetic field lines .
the gradual accumulation of material in the ring leads to increase of the pressure gradient , and , as a result , to the transforming of the original ring into the disk .
+ the work was supported by the basic research program of the presidium of the russian academy of sciences , russian foundation for basic research ( projects 11 - 02 - 00076 , 12 - 02 - 00047 , 13 - 02 - 00077 , 13 - 02 - 00939 ) , federal targeted program science and science education for innovation in russia 2009 - 2013 . | magnetic cataclysmic variables are binary stars donor star red dwarf accreting star white dwarf @xcite mcvs divided into polars intermediate polars magnetic fields some have fast - rotating white dwarf special place superpropellers @xcite intensive outflow of material additional angular momentum from magnetosphere accretion disk not formed representative object superpropellers is ae aqr analysis strange behavior connected with superpropeller regime white dwarf observational data show fast rotation flow from inner lagrange point @xmath0 retains in roche lobe accretor analyze mechanisms transfer efficiency angular momentum parameters system adopted from @xcite correspond to ae aqr donor star mass @xmath1 temperature @xmath2 k accretor star mass @xmath3 temperature @xmath4 k orbital rotation period @xmath5 h orbital separation @xmath6 estimated magnetic field on white dwarf surface @xmath7 mg proper rotation period @xmath8 s of white dwarf cartesian coordinate system with orbital angular velocity @xmath12 around center of mass binary system accreting star has proper dipolar magnetic fieldasynchronous rotation accretor magnetic field @xmath13 depends on time potential split total magnetic field @xmath15 into background field @xmath13 field @xmath16 induced by currents gas dynamic flows flow structure using equations @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 = n^2 \left (\gamma - \lambda ) + \frac{\eta}{4 \pi } b)^2 @xmath22 density @xmath23 velocity pressure roche potential velocity magnetic field entropy per unit mass number density proton mass magnetic diffusivity dependencies radiative heating cooling @xmath32 on temperature @xmath33 complicated density entropy pressure related by equation of state ideal gas @xmath34 @xmath35 heat capacity gas at constant volume @xmath36 adiabatic index model for simulation plasma flows in strong background magnetic fields based on averaged characteristics plasma flow wave turbulence influence magnetic field accretor @xmath37 described by force @xmath38@xmath39 time penetration magnetic field into plasma velocity perpendicular @xmath42 use 3d parallel mhd code for numerical simulations @xcite fig . [ fg1 ] results 3d simulations basic model for two values magnetic field induction accretor rotation white dwarf fast no accretion flowing material captured by rotating magnetosphere acquires momentum flows away roche lobe results show material remain in roche lobe even weak magnetic field similar results received by other authors quasi - particle method @xcite investigate behavior stream vicinity inner lagrange point @xmath0 ballistic approximation similar analysis by lubow and shu @xcite non - magnetic case use their approach magnetic field rotation accretor basis supersonic flow pattern neglect effects pressure use equation of motion vicinity inner lagrange point @xmath0 equation rewritten @xmath43 left panel fig . [ fg2 ] shows trajectories test particles ballistic approximation inner lagrange point @xmath0 for different magnetic fields test particles trajectory hydrodynamic case with results lubow and shu @xcite other trajectories non - zero magnetic field confirm results 3d mhd simulationsweak magnetic field ( @xmath44 mg ) trajectories not different from non - magnetic case strong magnetic fields @xmath45 mg ) trajectories deviate from hydrodynamic trajectory @xmath46 mg come to roche lobe white dwarf calculations show material flows away from roche lobe need consider physical mechanisms keeping material in roche lobe connected with partial ionization plasma degree ionization obtain hydrodynamic solution when accretion disk forms partial ionization ambipolar diffusion effective solution intermediate between pure hydrodynamic and ideal mhd ones manipulations expression for averaged electromagnetic force on plasma from external magnetic field : @xmath47 @xmath48 unit vector magnetic field @xmath42 larmor frequency for protons @xmath9 degree of ionization @xmath51 time between collisions of ions with neutrals ambipolar diffusion important for low degrees ionization @xmath52 to @xmath53 equilibrium degree of ionization gives values @xmath54 to @xmath55 in inner lagrange point @xmath0 aqr mechanism work in system other mechanism connected with relativistic effects due to fast rotation of accretorestimate effects consider electromagnetic field rotating magnetic dipole in vacuum solution maxwell equations laboratory @xmath56 @xmath57 + \frac{1}{r^2 c } \left 3 { \bf n } }\bf m } - \dot{{\bf m } } ] + \frac{1}{r c^2 } \bf n } \bf n }\bf m } } @xmath58 and @xmath59 vector magnetic moment characteristic spatial scale electromagnetic field light radius @xmath60 ae aqr system boundary light cylinder farther than inner lagrange point closer center donor relativistic effects important pressure magneto - dipole radiation material in roche lobe accretor effect add force determined last terms eqs numerical model lagrange point @xmath0 force @xmath61@xmath62 times smaller than gravitational force accretor neglect effect relativistic effect retard rotating magnetic field lines electromagnetic field rotating dipole determined by magnetic moment @xmath63 retarded time @xmath64 magnetic field lines rotate not solid body retard effect increases distance from acrretorboundary light cylinder velocity field lines rotation equals speed light @xmath65 outside light cylinder magnetic field transfer angular momentum to material model effect empirical dependence for angular velocity magnetic lines on radius right panel fig shows result calculations ballistic approximation exponential dependence for angular velocity magnetic lines rotation on radius approach find model parameters when sufficient part material stays in roche lobe white dwarf results 3d simulations shown in fig . demonstrates distribution density velocity field in equatorial plane binary system initial stage inflowing material forms ring around accretor accumulation leads pressure gradient subsequent evolution transformation original ring into disk material overfills roche lobe - overflows begin relativistic retard of rotating magnetic field lines effective mechanism for retention material in roche lobe accretor in mcvs fast rotating magnetized white dwarfs investigate flow structure in mcvs effects strong magnetic field fast rotation white dwarf ae aqr system example analyzed physical mechanisms prevent material outflow from binary system mechanisms ambipolar diffusion pressure magneto - dipole radiation relativistic retard of rotating magnetic field lines last mechanism most effectiveballistic calculations mhd 3d simulations show stable ring - like structures around accretor ae aqr system caused relativistic retard rotating magnetic field lines accumulation material in ring leads to pressure gradient transforming original ring into disk work supported by basic research program russian academy of sciences russian foundation for basic research projects - 00076 federal targeted program science education innovation russia 2009 - 2013 | 0.433639 | 2,793 | 1,381 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,388 | tio@xmath0 films were deposited on ( 100 ) lanthanum aluminates laalo@xmath1 substrates at a very low oxygen chamber pressure @xmath2 mtorr employing a pulsed laser ablation deposition technique . in previous work , it was established that the oxygen deficiency in these films induced ferromagnetism . in this work
it is demonstrated that this same oxygen deficiency also gives rise to semiconductor titanium ion impurity donor energy levels .
transport resistivity measurements in thin films of tio@xmath0 are presented as a function of temperature and magnetic field .
magneto- and hall- resistivity is explained in terms of electronic excitations from the titanium ion donor levels into the conduction band . | today , material research is focused toward a technology base whereby miniature devices operating at high speed , over a wide range of frequencies and exhibiting multifunctional properties can be developed routinely and efficiently@xcite .
titanium dioxide tio@xmath3 is a well known wide band gap oxide semiconductor belonging to the group iv - vi semiconductors .
it is described in terms of a model structure of ti@xmath4 and o@xmath5 ions .
it has large dielectric constant and dielectric anisotropy with various crystal structures .
tio@xmath6 is known to be an n - type semiconductor with a large energy gap in the range @xmath7 depending on sample preparation@xcite .
previously@xcite , thin tio@xmath0 films of thickness in the range @xmath8 were deposited on substrates of ( 100 ) of lanthanum aluminate laalo@xmath1 .
bulk tio@xmath6 does not order magnetically at room temperature . however , spontaneous magnetization in tio@xmath0 films@xcite occurred in the temperature range @xmath9 .
the spontaneous magnetization was attributed to the oxygen deficiency induced during the growth of the films .
it was argued that oxygen deficiency caused an imbalance in the ionic charge neutrality of the film thereby creating electron donor impurity ions of ti@xmath10 and ti@xmath11 in addition to the usual ti@xmath4 ions .
ferromagnetism , i.e. net magnetic moments in the ti@xmath10 and ti@xmath11 ions , was a result of superexchange interactions between these ions via the oxygen ions .
calculations indicate that of all possible superexchange permutations , double exchange may be the most predominant interaction in view of the filled electron bands of the oxygen ions@xcite .
it is well known@xcite that such double exchange favors ferromagnetism .
our purpose is to argue that the _ same _ magnetic ions and oxygen deficiency that gave rise to magnetism in tio@xmath0 films also play a vital role in the electronic _ transport properties_. specifically , the existence of donor ti@xmath10 and ti@xmath11 donor ions in our films allow for electronic excitations into conduction bands .
the number of carriers in the conduction band varies only mildly with magnetic field and more strongly with temperature .
indeed , the measurements reported here of the hall resistivity is approximately linear in the magnetic field and the the magneto - resistivity is only very mildly field dependent .
the magneto- and hall- resistivity have very similar temperature dependence reflecting the variation of the number of mobile electron transport carriers with temperature .
measurements of transport properties of tio@xmath6 films as well as the theoretical analysis are discussed in the next section .
the films were deposited employing a pulsed laser ablation deposition ( pld ) technique at an oxygen pressure @xmath2 mtorr .
final arguments are presented in the concluding section .
pulsed laser ablation deposition ( pld ) techniques were employed with a weakly paramagnetic magnetic tio@xmath6 target .
thin films of oxygen deficient tio@xmath0 were produced on ( 100 ) lanthanum aluminate laalo@xmath12 substrates . during the pld process
, the substrate temperature was fixed at @xmath13 while varying the oxygen pressure in the range @xmath14 .
films deposited at @xmath15 exhibited spontaneous magnetization and were therefore selected for measurements of magneto - transport film properties . the thickness of the films were in the range @xmath8 .
the details of the magnetic and crystallographic characterization as well as other impurities and contaminants in the films were previously reported@xcite . for steady currents and with the magnetic intensity @xmath16 directed normal to the film , the resistance matrix @xmath17 in the plane of the film
may be written as@xcite @xmath18 wherein @xmath19 and @xmath20 represent , respectively , the magneto - resistivity and the hall resistivity .
the resistance matrix @xmath17 of the tio@xmath0 films was measured by a conventional four - terminal technique using a gold - plated resistance sample puck from the quantum design physical property measurement system ( ppms ) .
in that the ferromagnetic moment per unit volume is small on the scale of applied magnetic intensities , @xmath21 , the magnetic field intensity may be identified with the magnetic induction @xmath22 , i.e. @xmath23 . as a consequence of such a weak magnetization @xmath24 , the anomalous hall resistivity is negligible .
the original hall expression for @xmath20 is sufficiently accurate .
the magneto - resistivity is here described by the drude model .
altogether , we may analyze the data in terms of the simple conventional expressions @xmath25 wherein @xmath26 is the density per unit volume of carriers in the conduction band . in fig .
[ fig1 ] is shown measurements of @xmath19 at zero magnetic intensity and @xmath20 at @xmath27 tesla is plotted as a function temperature @xmath28 .
at zero magnetic field intensity and the hall resistivity @xmath20 at @xmath29 tesla versus inverse temperature .
the temperature variations are quite similar , i.e. the hall angle @xmath30 is fairly uniform in temperature.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]
one notes that the temperature variations of @xmath19 and @xmath20 are quite similar as they are in other semiconductors@xcite the hall angle @xmath31 , as defined by @xmath32 is experimentally fairly uniform in temperature . for two temperatures , @xmath33 and @xmath34 . in the high temperature regime ,
the linear behavior in magnetic field @xmath35 is accurately obeyed . in the low temperature regime
there are experimental deviations from linear behavior.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] the hall resistivity @xmath20 as a function of magnetic field were measured at fixed temperature with applied field sweeps in the range @xmath36 .
the data for a high and low temperature are plotted in fig .
[ fig2 ] . for high temperatures ,
the experimental data is in excellent agreement with the linear magnetic field behavior for @xmath20 in eq.([transport2 ] ) . for low temperatures ,
the agreement with the linear behavior in magnetic field is only fair .
nevertheless , it is experimentally clear that the carriers are n - type and the carrier densities may be determined by @xmath37 quite accurately for high temperatures and somewhat less accurately for low temperatures .
the resulting variation of the density of carriers @xmath26 with temperature @xmath28 is shown in fig .
[ fig3 ] . as a function of temperature taken from hall resistivity data in a fixed magnetic field of @xmath29 tesla . also shown ( solid curve ) is the fit to eqs.([transport5 ] ) and ( [ transport6 ] ) with @xmath38 and @xmath39.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] the two striking features of the resulting inferred density of carriers are as follows : ( i ) the density of carriers does not appear to vanish in the low temperature limit @xmath40 .
in fact , there appears to be a low density of carriers in the ground state tio@xmath41 system of approximately @xmath42 at liquid helium temperatures .
this suggests that the electron chemical potential is placed very slightly into the conduction band by the ti@xmath10 donors .
the double exchange mechanism lowers that part of the conduction band containing electrons with spins parallel to those localized spins producing the magnetization@xcite .
these effects allow for the low density of ground state carriers .
( ii ) the density of carriers as a function of temperature exhibits a clear maximum .
we attribute this maximum in the number of carriers to the decrease of the magnetization @xmath43 to values below the saturation value @xmath44 as the temperature is raised .
theoretically , one finds from spin wave theory that @xmath45/t^{3/2}=a_0 $ ] .
for the temperature range here of experimental interest , we find that @xmath46 $ ] .
if the rise in the carrier band lowest energy state is proportional to the the deviation of the magnetization from saturation@xcite , i.e. if @xmath47 , then a reasonable phenomenological expression for the density of carriers , both in the ground state and in the thermally excited states , is @xmath48\ , \label{transport6}\ ] ] wherein the electron thermal wavelebgth @xmath49 @xmath50 is a dimensionless constant and @xmath51 is derived from the boltzman factor @xmath52 on the right hand side of eq.([transport6 ] ) .
that the density of carriers is the sum of ground state and thermally activated terms is at the heart of our phenomenology . as can be seen from the data in fig .
[ fig3 ] , the model gives rise to a good fit to the experimental data . of the magneto - resistance in eq.([transport7 ] ) is plotted as the function of magnetic field .
the blue squares and red circles represent , respectively , the measurements taken at temperatures @xmath53 and @xmath54.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] finally in fig . [ fig4 ] , the magneto - resistivity is plotted as a function of magnetic field in both the high and low temperature regimes .
one may view the fractional change in magneto - resistivity , @xmath55 as a measure of how strongly the carrier density @xmath26 and the carrier lifetime @xmath56 vary with magnetic field . in the high temperature regime ,
the fractional change in the magneto - resistivity is quite small @xmath57 . in the low temperature regime
the fractional change in magneto - resistivity is again fairly small @xmath58 .
altogether , the magnetic field variations of the magneto - resistivity obeys @xmath59 in all regimes .
that the deviations are small provides experimental support for the hall - drude model of electronic transport in eq.([transport2 ] ) for the oxygen deficient tio@xmath41 ferromagnetic semiconductor .
measurements of the magneto- and hall- resistivity have been measured in oxygen deficient tio@xmath0 magnetic semiconductor films .
the data can be understood on the basis of the hall - drude model of resistivity from mobile carriers .
the anomalous magnetic moment contribution to the hall resistivity is small in most regimes since the ferromagnetic moment @xmath60 resides mainly on the dilutely distributed ions ti@xmath10 and ti@xmath11 and the magnitude is small @xmath21 .
the drude relation time @xmath56 is only weakly dependent upon the magnetic field @xmath61 and the temperature @xmath28 so that both the hall resistivity @xmath20 and the normal resistivity @xmath19 vary similarly with temperature .
the experimental data can thereby be described in terms of a temperature dependent mobile carrier density @xmath62 .
apart from an expected zeeman internal magnetic field splitting of the conduction band wherein the carrier spins align themselves parallel to the spins of the local ionic ferromagnetic moments , there also appears to be a small but finite mobile carrier density that persists even in the @xmath40 limit .
the theory of such quantum ground state carriers in double ferromagnetic exchange semiconductors is worthy of further investigation . | material research focused toward technology miniature devices high speed wide range frequencies multifunctional properties developed efficiently titanium dioxide tio@xmath3 wide band gap oxide semiconductor group iv - vi semiconductors model structure of ti@xmath4 o@xmath5 ions large dielectric constant dielectric anisotropy various crystal structures tio@xmath6 n - type semiconductor large energy gap range @xmath7 depending sample preparation thin tio@xmath0 films @xmath8 deposited on substrates lanthanum aluminate bulk tio@xmath6 order magnetically at room temperature spontaneous magnetization in tio@xmath0 films occurred in temperature range @xmath9 attributed to oxygen deficiency during growth films caused imbalance ionic charge neutrality creating electron donor impurity ions of ti@xmath10 ti@xmath11 ferromagnetism ions result of superexchange interactions ions oxygen ions double exchange predominant filled electron bands oxygen ions double exchange favors ferromagnetism purpose to argue magnetic ions oxygen deficiency magnetism in tio@xmath0 films vital role in electronic transport propertiesdonor ti@xmath10 ions in films allow electronic excitations into conduction bands number carriers varies mildly with magnetic field temperature hall resistivity linear in magnetic field magneto - resistivity mildly field dependent similar temperature dependence variation electron transport carriers with temperature measurements transport properties of tio@xmath6 films theoretical analysis films deposited pulsed laser ablation deposition at oxygen pressure @xmath2 mtorr arguments section weakly paramagnetic tio@xmath6 target thin films of oxygen deficient tio@xmath0 produced on 100 lanthanum aluminate@xmath12 substrates substrate temperature fixed at @xmath13 oxygen pressure @xmath14 films deposited at @xmath15 spontaneous magnetization selected for magneto - transport film properties thickness films in range @xmath8 magnetic crystallographic characterization impurities contaminants in films reported for steady currents magnetic intensity @xmath16 normal resistance matrix @xmath17 in plane film written as@xcite @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 represent magneto - hall resistivityresistance matrix @xmath17 tio@xmath0 films measured conventional four - terminal technique gold - plated resistance sample puck quantum design physical property measurement system ferromagnetic moment per unit volume small applied magnetic intensities magnetic field intensity identified magnetic induction @xmath22 weak magnetization @xmath24 anomalous hall resistivity negligible original hall expression @xmath20 accurate magneto - resistivity described drude model analyze data conventional expressions @xmath25 @xmath26 density per unit volume carriers conduction band fig measurements @xmath19 at zero magnetic intensity @xmath20 at @xmath27 tesla plotted function temperature zero intensity hall resistivity @xmath20 @xmath29 tesla inverse temperature temperature variations similar hall angle @xmath30 uniform temperature temperature variations @xmath19 @xmath20 similar other semiconductors hall angle @xmath31 uniform temperature high temperature regime linear behavior magnetic field obeyed low temperature deviations linear behavior hall resistivity @xmath20 function magnetic field measured at fixed temperature applied field sweepsdata high low temperature plotted in fig . fig2 high temperatures experimental data with linear magnetic field behavior @xmath20 eq.([transport2 low temperatures agreement fair carriers are n - type densities determined by @xmath37 accurately high less low temperatures variation density carriers @xmath26 with temperature @xmath28 shown in fig . function of temperature hall resistivity data in fixed magnetic field of @xmath29 tesla fit to eqs.([transport5 transport6 with @xmath38 and @xmath39.=45.0% features inferred density carriers density vanish in low temperature limit @xmath40 low density carriers in ground state tio@xmath41 system @xmath42 at liquid helium temperatures electron chemical potential placed slightly into conduction band by ti@xmath10 donors double exchange mechanism lowers conduction band electrons magnetization@xcite effects allow low density of ground state carriers density of carriers function of temperature maximum maximum to decrease magnetization @xmath43 to values below saturation value @xmath44 as temperature raisedfinds spin wave theory @xmath45/t^{3/2}=a_0 $ temperature range experimental interest @xmath46 $ rise carrier band lowest energy state proportional to deviation magnetization from saturation @xmath47 reasonable phenomenological expression density of carriers ground thermally excited states @xmath48\{transport6} electron thermal wavelebgth @xmath49 @xmath50 dimensionless constant @xmath51 derived from boltzman factor @xmath52 density of carriers sum of ground state thermally activated terms heart phenomenology data fig fig3 model good fit experimental data magneto - resistance in eq.[transport7 plotted function of magnetic field blue squares red circles represent measurements at temperatures @xmath53 and @xmath54.=45.0% fig magneto - resistivity function of magnetic field high low temperature regimes fractional change in magneto - resistivity @xmath55 measure carrier density @xmath26 carrier lifetime @xmath56 vary with magnetic field high temperature regime fractional change small @xmath57 low temperature small @xmath58 magnetic field variations magneto - resistivity @xmath59 regimes deviations small support hall - drude model electronic transport oxygen deficient tio@xmath41 ferromagnetic semiconductor magneto- hall- resistivity measured oxygen deficient tio@xmath0 magnetic semiconductor films data understood hall - drude model resistivity mobile carriers anomalous magnetic moment contribution hall resistivity small regimes moment dilutely distributed ions ti@xmath10@xmath11 magnitude small @xmath21 drude relation time @xmath56 weakly dependent magnetic field @xmath61 temperature @xmath28 hall resistivity @xmath20 normal resistivity @xmath19 vary with temperature data temperature dependent mobile carrier density @xmath62 magnetic field splitting small finite mobile carrier density persists @xmath40 limit theory quantum ground state carriers in double ferromagnetic exchange semiconductors investigation | 0.354072 | 2,446 | 1,248 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,394 | we present three - dimensional monte carlo radiative transfer models of a very young ( @xmath0 years old ) low mass ( @xmath1 ) stellar cluster containing 23 stars and 27 brown dwarfs .
the models use the density and the stellar mass distributions from the large - scale smoothed particle hydrodynamics ( sph ) simulation of the formation of a low - mass stellar cluster by bate , bonnell and bromm . using adaptive mesh refinement ,
the sph density is mapped to the radiative transfer grid without loss of resolution .
the temperature of the ism and the circumstellar dust is computed using lucy s monte carlo radiative equilibrium algorithm . based on this temperature ,
we compute the spectral energy distributions of the whole cluster and the individual objects .
we also compute simulated far - infrared spitzer space telescope ( _ sst _ ) images ( 24 , 70 , and 160 @xmath2 bands ) and construct colour - colour diagrams ( near - infrared _ hkl _ and _ sst _ mid - infrared bands ) .
the presence of accretion discs around the light sources influences the morphology of the dust temperature structure on a large scale ( up to a several @xmath3 au ) .
a considerable fraction of the interstellar dust is underheated compared to a model without the accretion discs because the radiation from the light sources is blocked / shadowed by the discs .
the spectral energy distribution ( sed ) of the model cluster with accretion discs shows excess emission at @xmath4 330 @xmath5 and @xmath6 , compared to that without accretion discs . while the former is caused by the warm dust present in the discs , the latter is cause by the presence of the underheated ( shadowed ) dust .
our model with accretion discs around each object shows a similar distribution of spectral index ( 2.220 @xmath2 ) values ( i.e. class 0iii sources ) as seen in the @xmath7 ophiuchus cloud .
we confirm that the best diagnostics for identifying objects with accretion discs are mid - infrared ( @xmath4 310 @xmath5 ) colours ( e.g. _ sst _ irac bands ) rather than _ hkl _ colours . [ firstpage ] radiative transfer stars : formation circumstellar matter infrared : stars brown dwarfs accretion , accretion discs . | systematic investigations of young stellar objects ( ysos ) in a star - forming cloud including comparative studies of theoretical predictions and observations are important for understanding the stellar / substellar formation processes . examples of well - studied star - forming clouds are the orion trapezium cluster , ngc 2024 , and the @xmath7 ophiuchus and taurus - auriga clouds
. recent observations of young clusters have been used to determine circumstellar disc frequencies , disc mass distributions , initial mass functions ( imfs ) and evolutional stages of the objects in the clusters .
it has been shown that _
jhkl _ and _ hkl _ colour - colour diagrams are particularly effective in identifying the presence of circumstellar discs ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ) .
the spectral indices @xcite or the slopes of observed spectral energy distributions ( seds ) of ysos from near- to mid - infrared wavelengths are used to classify seds , and the classification scheme is often related to the evolutionary stages of ysos ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ) .
the distribution of circumstellar disk masses in young clusters can be measured from millimetre continuum emission ( e.g. @xcite for ngc 2024 ) .
determining imfs of young clusters requires evolutionary models ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ) and infrared spectroscopy for spectral type identifications ( e.g. @xcite for the @xmath7 ophiuchus cloud ) .
@xcite presented results from a very large three - dimensional ( 3-d ) smoothed particle hydrodynamics ( sph ) simulation of the collapse and fragmentation of a 50@xmath8 turbulent molecular cloud to form a stellar cluster .
the calculation resolved circumstellar discs down to @xmath9 au in radius and binary stars as close as 1 au . although some observational predictions , such as the imf and binary fraction , may be gleaned directly from a hydrodynamical simulation of stellar cluster formation , the principal observable characteristics ( optical , near - ir , ir , and sub - millimetre images and spectra ) require further detailed radiative transfer modelling .
the density distribution of such hydrodynamical calculations is very complicated , and the corresponding radiative transfer must be also performed in full 3-d .
there are two basic approaches to 3-d radiative transfer problems : grid based methods ( e.g. finite differencing , short- and long- characteristic methods ) , and particle ( photon ) based methods , i.e. monte carlo .
examples of the first kind are @xcite , @xcite and @xcite .
those of the second kind include @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite .
the advantages of the second approach are , for example , the flexibility to treat a complex density distribution and a complex scattering function .
readers are referred to @xcite and @xcite for more extensive discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of these two different methods .
the temperature of the interstellar and circumstellar dust in the cluster must be calculated in order to determine the source function of the dust emission .
the radiative equilibrium temperature of the dust particles can be found using the monte carlo method ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; and @xcite ) .
the technique used by @xcite takes into account the fractional photon absorptions between two events of a ` photon packet ' ; hence , it works well even in the limit of low opacity .
@xcite used the immediate re - emission technique , in which radiative equilibrium is forced at each interaction with the dust .
a photon is re - emitted immediately after an absorption event using a product of the dust opacity and the difference between the planck function with a current temperature and that with a new temperature corresponding to the radiative equilibrium of the dust that absorbed the photon . unlike the method of @xcite ,
this does not require a temperature iteration if the opacity is independent of temperature .
alternatively , @xcite used the ray - splitting method showing its effectiveness for both low and high optical depth media . here
we aim to simultaneously resolve the dust on parsec and sub - stellar - radius spatial scales , whilst including multiple radiation sources . to overcome the resolution problem ,
we have implemented an adaptive mesh refinement ( amr ) scheme in the grid production process of the torus radiative transfer @xcite .
see also @xcite , @xcite and @xcite for a similar gridding scheme in a radiative transfer problem .
the method described by @xcite is used to compute dust temperatures in our models .
the objectives of this paper are : 1.to compute observable quantities by solving the radiative transfer problem using a complex density distribution from the sph calculation by @xcite ; 2.to analyse the predicted observational properties of the cluster generated in the simulation of @xcite at a distance of 140 pc which corresponds to the distance of nearby star - forming regions such as taurus - auriga and the @xmath10ophiuchus cloud ( e.g. @xcite ) . in section 2 , we describe the details of our models .
the results of the model calculations are given in section 3 .
the conclusions are summarised in section 4 .
we calculate the main observable quantities of the low mass ( 50 @xmath8 ) cluster formation simulation by @xcite .
there are four basic steps in this process : 1 .
create the amr grid from the sph particle positions and the density at each particle .
the density is assigned to the grid cells during the grid construction .
2 . calculate the luminosity and the effective temperature of each light source ( in the sph calculation ) based on its mass using an evolutional model of young stars ( @xcite ; @xcite ) .
3 . compute the temperature of the dust in the cluster using the monte carlo radiative equilibrium model of @xcite .
4 . compute the seds and the images using the monte carlo radiative transfer code , torus .
bate et al .
( @xcite , @xcite , @xcite ) presented a numerical sph simulation of star cluster formation resolving the fragmentation process down to the opacity limit ( @xmath110.005m@xmath12 ) .
the initial conditions consist of a large - scale , turbulent molecular cloud with a mass of 50 @xmath8 and a diameter of 0.375 pc ( 77400 au ) .
the initial temperature of the cloud was 10 k , and its corresponding mean thermal jeans mass was 1 @xmath8 ( i.e. the cloud contained 50 thermal jeans masses ) .
the free - fall time of the cloud was @xmath13 .
similar to the method used by @xcite , they imposed an initial supersonic turbulent velocity field on the cloud by generating a divergence - free random gaussian velocity field with a power spectrum @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the wave number .
this was chosen to reproduce the observed larson scaling relations @xcite for molecular clouds .
the total number of particles used in the simulations was @xmath16 , making it one of the largest sph calculations ever performed .
approximately 95000 cpu hours on the sgi origin 3800 of the united kingdom astrophysical fluids facility ( ukaff ) were spent on the calculation .
we use the output from the final time step of the sph calculation as the input for the radiative transfer code .
the time of the data dump is 0.27 myr , at which the cluster contains 50 point masses ( stars and brown dwarfs ) .
each sph data point contains the position ( @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 ) , the velocity components ( @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 ) and the density ( @xmath7 ) .
the velocity information is not used in our calculation since we are only interested in continuum emission , but these data may be used in future calculations of molecular line emission .
the total masses contained in the stars and the molecular gas are @xmath23 and @xmath24 respectively .
the sph data provides the masses of the stellar objects ( 23 stars and 27 brown dwarfs ) , ranging from 0.005 to 0.731 @xmath8 ( see table [ tab : catalog ] ) . since the monte carlo radiative transfer code requires the luminosity ( @xmath25 ) , the effective temperature ( @xmath26 ) and the radius ( @xmath27 ) of each star , we computed them indirectly from evolutionary models . for a given age and mass of each star and brown dwarf
, the luminosity and the temperature are interpolated from the 1998 updated version of data by @xcite and @xcite available on their website ( http://www.mporzio.astro.it/~dantona/prems.html ) .
although the actual age of the stars and brown dwarfs in the sph data of @xcite ranges from @xmath112000 to @xmath1170000 years old , we make the pragmatic assumption that all the objects are 0.25 myr old because we believe that at young ages the stellar radii are overestimated ( c.f . , @xcite ) , leading to unrealistically high luminosities .
adopting models with ages of 0.25myr provides more plausible radii ( and therefore luminosities ) , while the change in temperature over this timespan is modest ( @xcite ) .
we take the spectral energy distribution of the individual stars to be blackbodies .
although we recognise that the spectra of the objects ( particularly at the lowest masses ) may be significantly structured due to molecular opacity , the vast majority of the stellar flux is reprocessed by the circumstellar dust and the precise form of the input spectrum is unimportant . | investigations of young stellar objects ysos in star - forming cloud comparative studies predictions important for understanding stellar substellar formation processes examples studied clouds are orion trapezium cluster ngc 2024 @xmath7 ophiuchus taurus - auriga clouds observations of young clusters determine circumstellar disc frequencies disc mass distributions initial mass functions evolutional stages _ jhkl and _ hkl _ colour - diagrams effective presence circumstellar discs spectral indices of ysos from near- to mid - infrared wavelengths classify seds related to evolutionary stages distribution of circumstellar disk masses in clusters measured from millimetre continuum emission determining imfs of clusters requires evolutionary models infrared spectroscopy ophiuchus cloud @xcite presented results from simulation of collapse fragmentation of 50@xmath8 turbulent molecular cloud to form stellar cluster calculation resolved circumstellar discs down to @xmath9 au radius binary stars close as 1 au observational predictions imf binary fraction gleaned from hydrodynamical simulation stellar cluster formation principal observable characteristics optical near - ir ir sub - millimetre images spectra require detailed radiative transfer modelling density distribution complicated radiative transfer must performed in full 3-d two approaches to 3-d radiative transfer grid based methods particle photon based methods monte carlo examples first are @xcite , @xcite @xcite second kind include @xcite @xcite advantages second approach flexibility complex density distribution complex scattering function to @xcite @xcite for discussion on advantages disadvantages methods temperature of interstellar circumstellar dust in must calculated determine source function of dust emission radiative equilibrium temperature dust found using monte carlo method @xcite @xcite technique @xcite fractional photon absorptions between events works well even in low opacity @xcite immediate re - emission technique radiative equilibrium forced at each interaction with dustphoton re - emitted after absorption using dust opacity difference between planck function current new temperature radiative equilibrium dust unlike @xcite temperature iteration opacity independent of temperature @xcite used ray - splitting method for low high optical depth media aim to resolve dust on parsec sub - stellar - radius spatial scales multiple radiation sources implemented adaptive mesh refinement scheme in grid production torus radiative transfer @xcite see @xcite for similar gridding scheme method @xcite dust temperatures objectives compute observable quantities radiative transfer problem using complex density distribution from sph calculation @xcite analyse predicted observational properties of cluster generated simulation @xcite at distance 140 pc nearby star - forming regions taurus - auriga @xmath10ophiuchus cloud section 2 details models results in section 3 conclusions in section 4 calculate main observable quantities of low mass ( 50 @xmath8 ) cluster formation simulation by @xcite four steps create amr grid from sph particle positions density at each particle density assigned to grid cells during grid constructioncalculate luminosity effective temperature each light source sph calculation based on mass using evolutional model young stars @xcite compute temperature dust cluster monte carlo radiative equilibrium model @xcite compute seds images monte carlo radiative transfer code bate al @xcite presented numerical sph simulation star cluster formation fragmentation process opacity limit @xmath110.005m@xmath12 initial conditions large - scale turbulent molecular cloud mass 50 @xmath8 diameter 0.375 pc 77400 au temperature 10 k mean thermal jeans mass 1 @xmath8 50 thermal masses free - fall time @xmath13 imposed initial supersonic turbulent velocity field cloud divergence - free random gaussian velocity field power spectrum @xmath14 @xmath15 wave number larson scaling relations @xcite for molecular clouds total number particles used simulations @xmath16 largest sph calculations performed 95000 cpu hours 3800 astrophysical fluids facility spent calculation output input for radiative transfer code time data dump 0.27 myr cluster contains 50 point massessph data point contains position velocity components density @xmath7 ) velocity information not used in calculation in continuum emission data may be used in future calculations molecular line emission total masses in stars molecular gas are @xmath23 and @xmath24 sph data provides masses of stellar objects ( 23 stars 27 brown dwarfs ranging from 0.005 to 0.731 @xmath8 table monte carlo radiative transfer code requires luminosity effective temperature radius of each star computed from evolutionary models for age mass star dwarf luminosity temperature interpolated from 1998 version data by @xcite actual age of stars brown dwarfs ranges from @xmath112000 to @xmath1170000 years assumption all objects are 0.25 myr old young ages stellar radii overestimated to high luminosities adopting models with ages of 0.25myr provides plausible radii luminosities change in temperature over timespan modest spectral energy distribution of stars to be blackbodies recognise spectra objects lowest masses structured due to molecular opacity majority stellar flux reprocessed by circumstellar dust precise form input spectrum unimportant | 0.346904 | 2,118 | 1,024 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,403 | nuclei under non - collective rotation with a large angular momentum above some threshold can assume a toroidal shape . in our previous work , we showed by using cranked skyrme - hartree - fock approach that even - even , n = z , high - k , toroidal isomeric states may have general occurrences for light nuclei with 28@xmath0@xmath1@xmath052 .
we present here some additional results and systematics on the particle - hole nature of these high - spin toroidal isomers . | a closed orientable surface has a topological invariant known as the euler characteristic @xmath2=@xmath3 , where the genus @xmath4 is the number of holes in the surface .
nuclei as we now know them have the topology of a sphere with @xmath2=2 .
wheeler suggested that under appropriate conditions the nuclear fluid may assume a toroidal shape ( @xmath2=0 ) . using the liquid - drop model @xcite and the rigid - body moment of inertia @xcite
, it was shown that a toroidal nucleus , endowed with an angular momentum @xmath5=@xmath6 aligned about its symmetry @xmath7-axis beyond a threshold , is stable against the breathing deformation in which the major radius @xmath8 contracts and expands .
the rotating liquid - drop nuclei can also be stable against sausage instabilities ( know also as plateau - rayleigh instabilities , in which the torus breaks into smaller fragments ) , when the same mass flow is maintained across the meridian to lead to high-@xmath6 isomers within an angular momentum window @xcite .
recently ichikawa _ et al . _
@xcite found that toroidal high - spin isomer with @xmath5=60@xmath9 may be in a local energy minimum in the excited states of @xmath10ca .
they used a cranked skyrme - hartree - fock ( hf ) method starting from the initial ring configuration of 10 alpha particles . in ref .
@xcite it was found from the time - dependent hf and the random - phase approximation that a collective rotation about the axis perpendicular to symmetry axis of the toroidal isomer @xmath10ca(@xmath5=60@xmath9 ) can result in a pure collective precession motion . in our previous study
@xcite , we found that rotating toroidal nuclei have general occurrences and we located 18 even - even , @xmath11=@xmath12 , high - spin toroidal isomeric states : @xmath13si(@xmath5=44@xmath9 ) , @xmath14s(@xmath5=48 , 66@xmath9 ) , @xmath15ar(@xmath5=56 , 72 , 92@xmath9 ) , @xmath10ca(@xmath5=60 , 82@xmath9 ) , @xmath16ti(@xmath5=68 , 88 , 112@xmath9 ) , @xmath17cr(@xmath5=72 , 98 , 120@xmath9 ) , and @xmath18fe(@xmath5=52 , 80 , 104 , 132@xmath9 ) in the region 16@xmath0a@xmath052 .
subsequent to the work of @xcite , ichikawa _ et al .
_ in ref .
@xcite investigated the existence of toroidal isomers and their precession motions for nuclei with 28@xmath0a@xmath052 .
they also obtained high - spin toroidal isomers in @xmath15ar , @xmath10ca , @xmath16ti , @xmath17cr , and @xmath18fe , confirming the general occurrence of high - spin toroidal isomers in this mass region in @xcite .
( color online . ) the total hfb energy of @xmath19 mg , @xmath13si , @xmath14s , @xmath15ar , @xmath10ca , @xmath16ti , @xmath17cr , and @xmath18fe as a function of the quadrupole moment @xmath20 for the case of @xmath5=0 , taken from ref .
axially - symmetric toroidal configurations are indicated by full circles , axially - asymmetric toroidal configurations by full squares , and configurations with a spherical topology by open circles .
some toroidal density distributions are displayed . ] to study the occurrence of high - spin toroidal isomers we use a three - step method @xcite , ( see also @xcite ) .
first , using the skyrme - hartree - fock - bogoliubov ( hfb ) model with the quadrupole moment constraints on @xmath20 , we look for those oblate configurations with toroidal nuclear density distributions , as shown in fig .
the energies of axially - symmetric toroidal configurations as a function of @xmath20 lie on a slope .
this indicates that the magnitudes of the shell corrections are not sufficient to stabilize the tori against the tendency to return to the topology of a sphere .
we next take these toroidal configurations as the initial configurations in @xmath20-constrained cranking skyrme - hf calculations . for a non - collectively rotating toroidal nucleus around the symmetry
@xmath7-axis with aligned angular momentum , @xmath5=@xmath6 , we use a lagrange multiplier @xmath21 to describe the constraint @xmath22=@xmath23=@xmath24 , where @xmath25 is the @xmath7-component of @xmath26-th single - particle total angular momentum .
when we locate the configurations which lie close to a local minimum for each quantized value of angular momentum , @xmath5=@xmath6 , we repeat the cranked hf calculations without the @xmath20 constraint to find the high - spin toroidal isomeric states in free convergence in the last step . results of this method in the case of @xmath18fe are shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] .
( color online . ) the excitation energy @xmath27 of high - spin toroidal states of @xmath18fe as a function of @xmath20 for different @xmath5=@xmath6 about the symmetry axis .
the locations of isomeric toroidal energy minima are indicated by the star symbols . ] from the quantum mechanical point of view , the non - collective rotation around the symmetry axis corresponds only to particle - hole ( p - h ) excitations in the axially - symmetric , @xmath5=0 , nucleus .
we plot in fig .
[ fig3 ] the @xmath5=0 toroidal proton - quasiparticle state energies as a function of the quadrupole moment @xmath20 obtained in skm*-hfb model for @xmath18fe .
the toroidal quasiparticle states are labelled by asymptotic quantum numbers @xmath28\omega$ ] .
it is clear from fig .
[ fig3 ] , and also fig .
1(a ) in ref .
@xcite , that the low - lying states possess the nodal quantum number of @xmath29=0 .
the occupation numbers of 14 , 18 , 22 , and 26 in fig .
[ fig3 ] indicate the toroidal shell - gaps , as in fig .
1(a ) of @xcite .
the occupation of all levels below the fermi energy of this even - even nucleus lead to the state with @xmath5=0 , while the 2p-2h and 3p-3h particle - hole excitation result to high - spin toroidal isomeric states with @xmath6=26 and 40@xmath9 , respectively .
( color online . )
the toroidal proton - quasiparticle energies as a function of the quadrupole moment @xmath20 obtained in the skm*-hfb model for @xmath18fe with @xmath5=0 .
they are labelled by @xmath28\omega$ ] , with even parity levels as solid lines , and odd parity levels as dashed lines .
starting from the @xmath5=0 configuration , the 2p-2h and 3p-3h excitations shown in the plot ( with holes as open circles and particles in solid circular points ) lead to non - collective rotations with a total @xmath6=26 and 40@xmath9 , respectively .
the vertical dashed lines coincide with the quadrupole deformations of two first toroidal isomers ( fig .
[ fig2 ] ) .
the horizontal ( red ) dashed line represents zero quasiparticle energy for @xmath5=0 . ]
.[table1 ] the quantized values of aligned angular momentum @xmath5=@xmath22 for different particle - hole excitations of the states with @xmath30=0 , where parameter @xmath31=0,1,@xmath32 . [ cols="^,<,<",options="header " , ] table [ table1 ] gives the simple rules to calculate the aligned angular momentum @xmath5=@xmath22 for different p - h excitations from states with @xmath30=0 , for neutron number @xmath11 ( or proton number @xmath12 ) , such that ( @xmath11 or @xmath12 mod 4)= 0 or 2 .
for nucleus @xmath18fe with @xmath11=@xmath12=26 and a parameter @xmath31=6 , one can find from table [ table1 ] the aligned angular momentum @xmath22=2@xmath3314 , 2@xmath3326 , 2@xmath3340 , 2@xmath3352 , 2@xmath3366@xmath9 for 1- , 2- , 3- , 4- , 5-p - h excitations , ( see also fig .
1(b ) in ref .
@xcite ) . with our method to study the occurrence of toroidal high - spin isomers described above
, all the above p - h states turn out to be toroidal isomeric states as shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] , with the exception of the ( 1p-1h ) @xmath22=28@xmath9 state that is apparently below the threshold for a non - collectively rotating toroidal nucleus .
( color online . )
the density distributions of the isomeric toroidal states of @xmath18fe with @xmath5= 52 , 80 , 104 , and 132@xmath9 as a cut in the radial direction @xmath34 .
the values of the isomeric quadrupole moments @xmath20 are indicated .
for the first isomeric toroidal state with @xmath5= 52@xmath9 we show the major radius @xmath8 and the minor radius @xmath35 ( see text ) .
the dash - dot curve shows the density distribution in the ground state of @xmath18fe . ]
we plot in fig .
[ fig4 ] the density distributions of the isomeric toroidal states of @xmath18fe ( presented in fig .
[ fig2 ] ) with @xmath5= 52 , 80 , 104 , and 132@xmath9 as a cut in the radial direction @xmath34 .
one notes that when the aligned angular momentum @xmath5 increases , the maximum toroidal density @xmath36 decreases from 0.134 to 0.123 @xmath37 and the major radius @xmath8 increases from 7.39 to 8.20 fm .
only the minor radius @xmath35 , defined as a half width at half maximum ( hwhm ) of the toroidal distribution , stays constant at @xmath381.37 fm .
for comparison , we also show the total density distribution of @xmath18fe in its ground state ( dash - dot curve ) with @xmath36=0.173 @xmath37 which is distinctly larger than @xmath36 of toroidal distributions .
the above - mentioned features are typical for all high - spin toroidal isomeric states of even - even , @xmath12=@xmath11 nuclei with 28@xmath0a@xmath052 , ( see table 1 in ref .
@xcite ) . in fig .
[ fig5 ] we plot the total energy of all found isomers as a function of @xmath39 .
one can see that the total energies of isomers obtained by the same p - h excitation show linear dependence on @xmath39 .
there appears to be a regular pattern on the systematics of high - spin toroidal isomers from which properties on the nuclear fluid in the exotic toroidal shape may be extracted .
( color online . )
the total energy of the isomeric toroidal states of @xmath13si , @xmath14s , @xmath15ar , @xmath10ca , @xmath16ti , @xmath17cr , and @xmath18fe of different @xmath5 values as a function of @xmath39 . ]
non - collective nuclear rotations with a large angular momentum provide a favorable environment for the nuclear matter to redistribute itself .
our exploration of the density distribution of these nuclei with cranked self - consistent skyrme - hartree - fock approach in the region of 28@xmath0@xmath1@xmath052 reveals the possibility of toroidal - shape high - spin isomers at their local energy minima , when the angular momenta are greater than some large thresholds .
the particle - hole nature of these non - collective rotational states , the locations of these local energy minima , the magnitudes of the non - collective angular momenta , and the geometrical properties of these isomeric states have been systematically evaluated for further theoretical and experimental explorations . | closed orientable surface topological invariant euler characteristic @xmath2=@xmath3 genus @xmath4 number holes surface nuclei topology sphere @xmath2=2 wheeler nuclear fluid toroidal shape @xmath2=0 liquid - drop model rigid - body moment inertia toroidal nucleus angular momentum @xmath5=@xmath6 aligned symmetry @xmath7-axis stable against breathing deformation radius contracts expands rotating liquid - drop nuclei stable against sausage instabilities plateau - rayleigh instabilities torus breaks into fragments mass flow meridian high-@xmath6 isomers angular momentum window ichikawa found toroidal high - spin isomer with @xmath5=60@xmath9 local energy minimum in excited states @xmath10ca used cranked skyrme - hartree - fock method initial ring configuration 10 alpha particles collective rotation axis perpendicular to symmetry axis toroidal isomer @xmath10ca(@xmath5=60@xmath9 collective precession motionprevious study @xcite found rotating toroidal nuclei general occurrences located 18 @xmath11=@xmath12 high - spin toroidal isomeric states @xmath13si=44=48 , 66=56 , 72 , 92=60 , 82=68 , 88 , 112 @xmath17cr=72 , 98 120 @xmath18fe(=52 , 80 , 104 , 132 region 16@xmath0a@xmath052 subsequent work @xcite ichikawa et al @xcite investigated existence toroidal isomers precession motions nuclei 28@xmath0a@xmath052 obtained high - spin toroidal isomers @xmath15ar confirming general occurrence high - spin toroidal isomers mass region @xcite total hfb energy @xmath19 mg @xmath13si function quadrupole moment @xmath20 case @xmath5=0 taken ref .axially - symmetric toroidal configurations by full circles full squares open circles toroidal density distributions displayed study high - spin toroidal isomers three - step method @xcite model with quadrupole moment constraints on @xmath20 look for oblate configurations with toroidal nuclear density distributions shown in fig . energies of axially - symmetric toroidal configurations on slope shell corrections not stabilize tori against topology sphere configurations initial in @xmath20-constrained skyrme - hf calculations for non - collectively rotating toroidal nucleus around @xmath7-axis with aligned angular momentum use lagrange multiplier @xmath21 constraint @xmath22=@xmath23=@xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath7-component of @xmath26-th total angular momentum locate configurations close to local minimum for each value angular momentum repeat hf calculations without @xmath20 constraint to find high - spin toroidal isomeric states in free convergence results shown in fig .excitation energy @xmath27 high - spin toroidal states @xmath18fe function @xmath20 @xmath5@xmath6 symmetry axis locations isomeric toroidal energy minima star symbols non - collective rotation around symmetry axis corresponds particle - hole excitations axially - symmetric @xmath5=0 nucleus @xmath5=0 toroidal proton - quasiparticle state energies quadrupole moment @xmath20 model @xmath18fe toroidal quasiparticle states labelled asymptotic quantum numbers @xmath28\omega$ low - lying states nodal quantum number @xmath29=0 occupation numbers 14 18 22 26 indicate toroidal shell - gaps occupation levels below fermi energy nucleus state @xmath5=0 2p-2h 3p-3h particle - hole excitation high - spin toroidal isomeric states @xmath6=26 40@xmath9 toroidal proton - quasiparticle energies function quadrupole moment @xmath20 model @xmath18fe @xmath5=0 labelled @xmath28\omega$ even parity levels solid lines odd parity levels dashed lines@xmath5=0 configuration 2p-2h 3p-3h excitations particles circular points lead non - collective rotations total @xmath6=26 40@xmath9 vertical dashed lines quadrupole deformations toroidal isomers horizontal dashed line zero quasiparticle energy @xmath5=0 quantized values aligned angular momentum @xmath5=@xmath22 particle - hole excitations states @xmath30=0 parameter @xmath31=0,1,@xmath32 calculate aligned angular momentum @xmath5=@xmath22 p - h excitations states @xmath30=0 neutron number @xmath11 proton number @xmath12 @xmath11 mod= 0 or 2 nucleus @xmath18fe @xmath11=@xmath12=26 parameter @xmath31=6 aligned angular momentum @xmath22=2@xmath3314@xmath3326@xmath3340@xmath3352@xmath3366@xmath9 1- 2- 3- 4- 5-p - h excitations fig . 1(b ) toroidal high - spin p - h states toroidal isomeric states fig fig2 exception @xmath22=28@xmath9 state below threshold non - rotating toroidal nucleus density distributions isomeric toroidal states @xmath18fe @xmath5= 52 80 104 132@xmath9 cut radial direction @xmath34 values isomeric quadrupole moments @xmath20 indicated first isomeric toroidal state @xmath5= 52@xmath9 major radius @xmath8 minor radius @xmath35 dash - dot curve density distribution ground state @xmath18fe plot fig density distributions isomeric toroidal states @xmath18fe @xmath5= 52 80 104 132@xmath9 cut radial direction @xmath34 aligned angular momentum @xmath5 increases maximum toroidal density @xmath36 decreases 0.134 to 0.123 major radius @xmath8 increases 7.39 to 8.20 fm minor radius @xmath35 constant @xmath381.37 fm total density distribution @xmath18fe ground state @xmath36=0.173 @xmath37 larger @xmath36features typical for high - spin toroidal isomeric states of @xmath12=@xmath11 nuclei with 28@xmath0a@xmath052 table 1 fig total energy of isomers function of @xmath39 total energies isomers excitation show dependence on @xmath39 regular pattern on systematics high - spin toroidal isomers properties nuclear fluid toroidal shape extracted total energy of isomeric toroidal states of @xmath13si @xmath5 values function of @xmath39 non - collective nuclear rotations with large angular momentum provide favorable environment for nuclear matter exploration density distribution nuclei approach region of 28@xmath0@xmath1@xmath052 reveals possibility of toroidal - shape high - spin isomers at local energy minima angular momenta greater than thresholds particle - hole nature of non - collective rotational states locations local energy minima magnitudes angular momenta geometrical properties evaluated for experimental explorations | 0.430307 | 2,899 | 1,538 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,415 | a lorentz - symmetry test with ca@xmath0 ions demonstrated the potential of using quantum information inspired technology for tests of fundamental physics .
a systematic study of atomic - system sensitivities to lorentz violation identified the ytterbium ion as an ideal system with high sensitivity as well as excellent experimental controllability .
a test of lorentz - violating physics in the electron - photon sector with yb@xmath0 ions has the potential to reach levels of 10@xmath1 , five orders of magnitude more sensitive than the current best bounds .
similar sensitivities may be also reached with highly charged ions . | local lorentz invariance ( lli ) is an important foundation of modern physics and has been a subject of many stringent experimental and observational tests.@xcite however , a number of theories unifying gravity with the standard model of particle physics suggest possible violation of lorentz symmetry . while the suggested lli - violation energy scale is much larger than the energy currently attainable by particle accelerators , it might be accessible with precision measurements at low energy .
therefore , high - precision tests of lli with photons and particles ( protons , neutrons , electrons ) may provide insight into possible new physics and set limits on various theories .
experimental breakthroughs in atomic , molecular and optical ( amo ) physics , including laser cooling and trapping of atoms , attainment of bose - einstein condensation , optical frequency combs , and quantum control led to extraordinary advances in the control of matter and light . these achievements , coupled with dramatic improvements in precision time and frequency metrology , measurement techniques such as atomic interferometry and magnetometry , and advances in first - principles atomic and molecular theory enabled a plethora of new applications of amo , including novel ways to test the fundamental physics laws .
the availability of trapped ultracold atoms and ions , subject to precise interrogation and control , provided for new opportunities for tests of lorentz symmetry .
a diverse set of amo lorentz - symmetry tests involves experiments with atomic clocks,@xcite other precision spectroscopy measurements,@xcite magnetometers,@xcite electromagnetic cavities,@xcite and quantum information trapped ion technologies.@xcite a cold cs atom clock test of lorentz invariance in the matter sector was carried out in ref . , setting the best limits on the tensor lorentz - violating coefficients for the proton . in 2015 , an experiment with a pair of trapped calcium ions improved bounds on lli - violating standard - model extension ( sme ) coefficients @xmath2 for electrons by a factor of 100 demonstrating the potential of quantum information techniques in the search for physics beyond the standard model.@xcite the same experiment can be interpreted as testing anisotropy in the speed of light , improving a previous such bound@xcite by a factor of 5 , with the sensitivity similar to more recent work reported in ref . .
lorentz - violation tests are analyzed in the context of the phenomenological framework known as the sme , which is an effective field theory that augments the standard - model lagrangian with every possible combination of the standard - model fields that is not term - by - term lorentz invariant , while maintaining gauge invariance , energy - momentum conservation , and observer lorentz invariance of the total action.@xcite violations of lorentz invariance and the einstein equivalence principle in bound electronic states result in a small shift of the hamiltonian that can be described by@xcite @xmath3 where we use atomic units , @xmath4 is the momentum of a bound electron , and @xmath5 is the speed of light .
the parameters @xmath6 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 are elements in the @xmath9 tensor which characterises hypothetical lorentz violation in the electron sector within the sme.@xcite the nonrelativistic form of the @xmath10 operator is @xmath11 . predicting the energy shift due to lli violation involves the calculation of the expectation value of the above hamiltonian for the atomic states of interest .
therefore , the shift of the ca@xmath0 @xmath12 energy level due to the @xmath9 tensor depends on the values of @xmath13 and @xmath14 matrix elements . the frequency difference ( in hz ) between the shifts of the @xmath15 and @xmath16 substates of the @xmath12 manifold
was calculated in ref .
: @xmath17 the basic idea of the ca@xmath0 experiment is to monitor this energy difference between the magnetic @xmath18 and @xmath19 substates of the @xmath12 @xmath20 manifold over time to set the limit on potential violation of lli .
therefore , the shift of the ca@xmath0 @xmath12 energy level due to the @xmath9 tensor depended only on the value of @xmath14 matrix element , as the contribution of the scalar term canceled for the states of the same @xmath20 manifold .
superposition of two ions prepared in a decoherence - free subspace @xmath21 where @xmath22 represents the @xmath12 state with @xmath23 and @xmath24 for the first and second ion , respectively , allowed elimination of the largest potential systematic uncertainty cased by the fluctuation of the magnetic field .
details of the experiment are given in ref . .
further improvement of lli violation limits calls for a system with a long - lived ( or ground ) state that has a large @xmath25 matrix element .
we have carried out a systematic study of this quantity for various systems and identified general rules for the enhancement of the reduced matrix elements of the @xmath26 operator.@xcite our calculations for @xmath27 states in ba@xmath0 and yb@xmath0 , which are heavier analogues of ca@xmath0 , found only a small increase of the @xmath26 matrix elements in comparison with the ca@xmath0 case .
however , yb@xmath0 has another metastable level , @xmath28 @xmath29 with the @xmath30 matrix element that is over an order of magnitude larger than for the @xmath27 states .
we find that deeper localization of the probe electron leads to enhanced sensitivity to the tensor lorentz violation .
our study has shown that @xmath31 of @xmath320.8 a.u or below for the corresponding electron is a good indicator of the large value of the reduced @xmath26 matrix element .
this condition is satisfied for the @xmath33 hole states , such as yb@xmath0 state considered here , or for highly charged ions with @xmath34 valence electrons and degree of ionization @xmath35 .
the reduced @xmath26 matrix elements in yb@xmath0 and sm@xmath36 are 135 a.u . and 149 a.u .
, respectively , in comparison of 9.3 a.u for the @xmath12 state in ca@xmath0 .
the yb@xmath0 @xmath28 @xmath29 state also has an exceptionally long lifetime on the order of several years.@xcite therefore , the ramsey duration of the proposed experiment with yb@xmath0 is not limited by spontaneous decay during the measurement as in ca@xmath0 case .
the electric - octupole e3 transition between the @xmath28 @xmath37 excited state and the ground state is used as the basis for the optical atomic clock with the single trapped yb@xmath0 ion , which presently has the lowest uncertainty among the all of the optical ion clocks.@xcite yb@xmath0 ions are also used in quantum information research.@xcite as a result , experimental techniques for precision control and manipulation of yb@xmath0 atomic states are particulary well developed making it an excellent candidate for searches of lorentz - violation signature .
we estimated that experiments with the metastable @xmath28 @xmath37 state of yb@xmath0 can reach sensitivities of @xmath38 for the @xmath2 coefficients,@xcite over @xmath39 times more stringent than current best limits.@xcite moreover , the projected sensitivity to the @xmath40 coefficients will be at the level of @xmath41 , below the ratio between the electroweak and planck energy scales.@xcite similar sensitivities may potentially be reached for lv tests with highly charged ions , given future development of experimental techniques for these systems . | lorentz invariance lli ) foundation modern physics subject tests theories unifying gravity with particle physics suggest violation lorentz symmetry suggested lli - violation energy scale larger than particle accelerators accessible with measurements at low energy high - precision tests lli with photons particles may provide insight new physics set limits theories breakthroughs in atomic molecular optical physics laser cooling trapping bose - einstein condensation optical frequency combs quantum control advances control matter light improvements precision time frequency metrology atomic interferometry magnetometry first - principles atomic molecular theory enabled new applications amo fundamental physics laws trapped ultracold atoms ions new opportunities for tests lorentz symmetry lorentz - symmetry tests with atomic clocks precision spectroscopy magnetometers electromagnetic cavities quantum information trapped ion technologies cold atom clock test lorentz invariance in matter sector carried out setting limits tensor lorentz - violating coefficients for proton 2015 experiment with trapped calcium ions improved lli - violating standard - model extension coefficients electrons by factor 100 potential quantum information techniques physics beyond standard model experiment anisotropy in speed of light improving previous bound factor 5 sensitivity similar to recent work lorentz - violation tests analyzed sme effective field theory augments standard - model lagrangian maintaining gauge invariance energy - momentum conservation observer lorentz invariance action violations of lorentz invariance einstein equivalence principle in electronic states result in small shift hamiltonian described momentum electron speed light parameters @xmath6 @xmath8 elements in @xmath9 tensor characterises hypothetical lorentz violation electron sector nonrelativistic form @xmath10 operator is @xmath11 predicting energy shift due to lli violation involves calculation expectation value hamiltonian for atomic states shift energy level due to @xmath9 tensor depends on values @xmath13 @xmath14 matrix elements frequency difference between shifts @xmath15 @xmath16 substates manifold calculated in ref @xmath17 ca@xmath0 experiment energy difference between magnetic @xmath18 @xmath19 substates @xmath12 manifold potential violation lli shift ca@xmath0 @xmath12 energy level @xmath9 tensor depended on @xmath14 matrix element scalar term @xmath20 manifold superposition of two ions in decoherence - free subspace @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath12 state @xmath23 @xmath24 systematic uncertainty magnetic field details experiment in ref . improvement lli violation limits system long - lived state large @xmath25 matrix element systematic study quantity identified rules for enhancement reduced matrix elements @xmath26 operator calculations for @xmath27 states ba@xmath0 yb@xmath0 found small increase of @xmath26 matrix elements ca@xmath0 case yb@xmath0 has metastable level @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 matrix element larger than @xmath27 states deeper localization probe electron leads enhanced sensitivity tensor lorentz violation @xmath31 of @xmath320.8 a.u or below indicator of large value reduced @xmath26 matrix elementcondition satisfied @xmath33 hole states highly charged ions @xmath34 valence electrons ionization @xmath35 reduced @xmath26 matrix elements yb@xmath0 sm@xmath36 135 149 a.u . 9.3 a.u @xmath12 state ca@xmath0 yb@xmath0 @xmath28 @xmath29 state long lifetime years duration experiment yb@xmath0 not limited by decay electric - octupole e3 transition between @xmath28 @xmath37 state ground state basis optical atomic clock single trapped yb@xmath0 ion lowest uncertainty optical ion clocks yb@xmath0 ions used in quantum information research experimental techniques precision control manipulation yb@xmath0 atomic states developed excellent lorentz - violation signature experiments metastable @xmath28 @xmath37 state@xmath0 reach @xmath38 @xmath2 coefficients @xmath39 times stringent limits projected sensitivity @xmath40 coefficients level @xmath41 below ratio electroweak planck energy scales similar sensitivities for tests highly charged ions future development | 0.267085 | 1,668 | 866 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,417 | we consider a model of a universe with ghost dark energy and van der waals fluid interacting with a fluid which was born as a result of interaction between original fluid and some other fluid existing in universe .
we suppose that ghost dark energy has its contribution to the model by an interaction term @xmath0 and we suppose that @xmath1 .
[ [ section ] ] we consider a universe composed of van der waals fluid @xcite , @xcite @xmath2 interacting with a modified fluid model @xcite @xmath3 @xmath4.\ ] ] where @xmath5 is a scale factor , @xmath6 is an interaction coefficient .
the origin of such fluid can be supposed to be an interaction or different types of interactions between an original fluid and other fluids in universe , which are coded in @xmath6 .
generally the origin of this fluid can be anything , but here we will not make assumption and will consider the universe in the presence of this fluid .
we will consider an interaction between last two fluids and we will suppose the presence of a ghost dark energy @xcite , @xcite with energy density given as @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the hubble parameter .
concerning to this component we assume that ghost dark energy with ( [ eq : ghost ] ) will appear and play a role only in interaction term .
dark energy was born in gr to explain experimental data claiming , that the expansion of the universe is accelerated .
dark energy with dark matter are exotic and mysterious components of the universe , capturing a lot of attention and not to be explained still .
generally , it is accepted that dark energy should be described by negative pressure and positive energy density , therefore implying negative eos parameter @xmath9 .
the simplest model is a cosmological constant @xmath10 introduced by einstein , but it suffers with the problem known as cosmological coincidence problem asking why are we living in an epoch in which the densities of dark energy and matter are comparable ? one of the ways to solve the cosmological coincidence problem is to consider the interaction between the components on phenomenological level .
generally , interaction could be considered as a function of energy densities and their derivatives : @xmath11 . to make everything working with units , we only should consider the fact that unit of interaction term @xmath12=\frac{[energy ~ density]}{time}$ ] and assume that unit @xmath13 could be contributed , for instance , from hubble parameter . over years
different models of interactions were proposed and considered , but everything was done on phenomenological level only .
very intensively were considered interactions @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is a coupling constant , other form of interactions , where question of time unit were solved with help of first order time derivative @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 .
interaction of the general form @xmath21 , where @xmath22 also captured a lot of attention .
interaction between components arose as a result of splitting of the energy conservation , which mathematically can be described as follows : @xmath23 and @xmath24 which could be understood as : there is not energy conservation for the components separately , but due to interaction between all components , energy of whole mixture conserves .
this approach is correct for this moment only .
other type of interaction considered in literature and supported by experimental data is sign - changeable interaction @xcite , @xcite , @xcite .
motivated by @xcite we would like to consider an interaction where energy density of the ghost dark energy appears @xmath25 by this way we would like to make a possibility for other two components to feel an existence of other component which does not appear in field equations .
the mixture of our consideration will be described by @xmath26 and @xmath27 given by @xmath28 and @xmath29 paper organized as follow : after introduction , in next section we will give field equations and a strategy how to solve and find scale factor @xmath5 .
then in two other sections we will work in case when there is not interaction between components and then we will switch on interaction . in section discussion
obtained results will be summarized . | field equations that governs our model of consideration are @xmath30 and with frw metric ( the metric of a spatially flat homogeneous and isotropic universe ) @xmath31 they reduce to @xmath32 @xmath33 energy conservation condition reads as @xmath34 to introduce an interaction between dark energy and matter , as already was mentioned in introduction section , ( [ eq : bianchi eq ] ) splits into two following equations @xmath35 and @xmath36 in our case problem solving strategy will start with finding pressure of modified fluid from ( [ eq : inteqm ] ) @xmath37 pressure of van der waals fluid ( [ eq : waals ] ) with ( [ eq : fridmman vlambda ] ) will be expressed by @xmath38 @xmath39 ( [ eq : fridmman vlambda ] ) , ( [ eq : freidmann2 ] ) , ( [ eq : mpressure ] ) and ( [ eq : pwrhom ] ) together allow us to determine a scale factor . from the next section
we will start from the simple case , when interaction between modified fluid and van der waals fluid is absence and then we will present results accounting interaction ( [ eq : ourint ] ) .
[ [ section-1 ] ] non interacting case with @xmath40 simplify equations under consideration and solution could be find very easily .
bellow we will present behavior of @xmath41 and @xmath42 over time ( fig .
[ fig:1]-[fid:3 ] ) .
@xmath43{accel1.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega1.jpg } \end{array}$ ] @xmath43{accel4.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega4.jpg } \end{array}$ ] @xmath43{accel5.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega5.jpg } \end{array}$ ] [ [ section-2 ] ] in this section we will analyze the case when we account interaction between mixture components .
bellow we presented graphical analysis for several cases , with different values of parameters ( fig .
[ fig:4]-[fid:6 ] ) .
@xmath43{accel1_2.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega1_2.jpg } \end{array}$ ] @xmath43{accel1_2_1.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega1_2_1.jpg } \end{array}$ ] @xmath43{accel2_2.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega2_2.jpg } \end{array}$ ] @xmath43{accel3_2.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega3_2.jpg } \end{array}$ ] @xmath43{accel3_2_1.jpg } & \includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega3_2_1.jpg } \end{array}$ ]
we suppose a model of an universe consists of ghost dark energy , van der waals fluid interacting with a modified fluid , which could be result of some interaction ( we could only suppose ) .
interaction between components were assumed to be @xmath1 . by this way
the role of the ghost dark energy were seen by interaction term only . during the investigation
we recover scale factor @xmath5 and present graphical analysis of @xmath41 and eos parameter @xmath42 .
analysis shows that the effects concerning to the presence of a ghost dark energy expressed in interaction term was observed in later stages of the evolution comparing with cases corresponding to absence and presence an interaction of the @xmath44 form between components . from the graphical analysis
we see , that having a situation proposed in this article it is not always true the assumption that dark energy could be the source of the accelerated expansion of the universe .
at least , for some values of the parameters of the model we observe that the mixture behaves as a dark energy with negative eos parameter , while @xmath45 .
for some cases we saw that dark energy really is responsible for accelerated expansion with @xmath46 .
almost the same result we obtain considering a modified fluid not described by the energy density of our consideration , but as a fluid described as @xmath47 . which corresponds to a cosmological constant model with @xmath48 .
here we have following possibilities , first that the modification of a fluid of our consideration could not work with van der waals gas , or probably an interaction of the consideration between components is not realistic and other modification should be done with interaction term .
there is other possibility , which from our opinion is also has right to be , that dark energy is not always was and will be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe .
this research activity has been supported by eu fonds in the frame of the program fp7-marie curie initial training network index no.289968 .
urban , a.r .
zhitnitsky , phys .
d 80 , 063001 ( 2009 ) ; + f.r .
urban , a.r .
zhitnitsky , jcap 09 , 018 ( 2009 ) ; + f.r .
urban , a.r .
zhitnitsky , phys .
b 688 , 9 ( 2010 ) ; + f.r .
urban , a.r .
zhitnitsky , nucl .
b 835 , 135 ( 2010 ) ; + n. ohta , phys . lett .
b 695 , 41 ( 2011 ) ; + r.g .
cai , z.l .
tuo , h.b .
zhang , arxiv:1011.3212 .
+ a. sheykhi , a. bagheri , europhys .
95 , 39001 ( 2011 ) ; + e. ebrahimi , a. sheykhi , phys .
b 705 , 19 ( 2011 ) ; + e. ebrahimi , a. sheykhi , int . j. mod
d 20 , 2369 ( 2011 ) ; + a. sheykhi , m. sadegh movahed , gen .
[ doi:10.1007/s10714 - 011 - 1286 - 3 ] . | field equations model @xmath30 metric flat isotropic universe @xmath31 reduce to @xmath32 @xmath33 energy conservation condition @xmath34 interaction between dark energy matter eq : bianchi eq ] splits into two equations @xmath35 @xmath36 problem solving strategy finding pressure of modified fluid from eq : inteqm ] ) @xmath37 pressure van der waals fluid eq waals eq : fridmman vlambda expressed by @xmath38 @xmath39 eq : fridmman vlambda freidmann2 ] eq : mpressure ] eq : pwrhom ] determine scale factor next section start simple case interaction between modified fluid van der waals fluid absence present results accounting interaction eq : ourint ] non interacting case with @xmath40 simplify equations solution present behavior of @xmath41 @xmath42 over time fig:1]-:3 @xmath43{accel1.jpg\includegraphics[width=50{omega1.jpg @xmath43{accel4.jpg{accel5.jpgjpg }\end{array}$ section-2 ] analyze interaction between mixture components presented graphical analysis several cases different values parameters ( fig .:4]-:6 ] ) @xmath43{accel1_2.jpg }\includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega1_2.jpg @xmath43{accel1_2_1.jpg\includegraphics[width=50 mm{omega1_2_1.jpg @xmath43{accel2_2.jpg\includegraphics[width=50 mm{omega2_2.jpg @xmath43{accel3_2.jpg\includegraphics[width=50 mm]{omega3_2.jpg{accel3_2_1.jpg{omega3_2_1.jpg model universe ghost dark energy van der waals fluid interacting modified fluid result interaction interaction between components assumed @xmath1 role ghost dark energy seen interaction term only investigation recover scale factor @xmath5 present graphical analysis of @xmath41 eos parameter @xmath42 analysis shows effects presence ghost dark energy interaction term observed later stages evolution absence presence interaction @xmath44 form analysis not always true assumption dark energy source accelerated expansion universevalues parameters model mixture behaves as dark energy negative eos parameter @xmath45 dark energy responsible for accelerated expansion with @xmath46 same result modified fluid @xmath47 corresponds cosmological constant model @xmath48 possibilities modification fluid work with van der waals gas interaction components not realistic other modification interaction term dark energy not always responsible for accelerated expansion research supported by eu fonds program fp7-marie curie initial training network index no.289968 urban , a.r . zhitnitsky . d 80 , 063001 ( 2009 ) jcap 09 , 018 phys . b 688 , 9 2010 ) nucl . b 835 , 135 ( 2010 n. ohta phys . lett . b 695 , 41 ( 2011 ) r.g cai z.l . tuo h.b . zhang arxiv:1011.3212 a. sheykhi , a. bagheri , europhys . 95 , 39001 ( 2011 ) e. ebrahimi , a. sheykhi phys . b 705 , 19 2011sheykhi int 20 2369 2011 sheykhi sadegh movahed doi:10.1007/s10714 - - 1286 - 3 | 0.258501 | 1,377 | 731 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,422 | in this talk a brief review of several problems involving systems with strangeness is made . in the first place one
shows how the @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath2 states , for @xmath3 , and the @xmath4 for @xmath5 are generated dynamically in the context of unitarized chiral perturbation theory .
the results for the @xmath6 interaction are then used to evaluate the @xmath7 scattering length .
results obtained for the kaon selfenergy in a nuclear medium within this approach , with application to @xmath8 atoms , are also mentioned .
finally a few words are said about recent developments in the weak decay of @xmath9 hypernuclei and the puzzle of the @xmath10 ratio . | the combination of unitary techniques together with chiral dynamics of meson and baryon systems already used in @xcite and @xcite to study low - energy @xmath11 scattering , has reached a certain maturity , it has been made more systematic and it has also been applied to the study of a large variety of physical processes @xcite .
the idea behind this work is the use of the unitarity constraints in coupled channels , which provide the imaginary part of the inverse of the scattering @xmath12 matrix .
from there , by means of dispersion relations , or equivalent techniques , one can construct the whole @xmath12 matrix . in the strangeness @xmath13
sector the n / d , or dispersion relation method has been applied in @xcite with the result that the @xmath12 matrix in coupled channels can be written as @xmath14^{-1}\ , v \label{eq : bs1}\ ] ] with @xmath15 obtained from the lowest order chiral lagrangian for meson baryon interaction and @xmath16 a properly regularized loop function of the meson baryon propagators of the intermediate states .
the function @xmath15 is given by @xmath17 with @xmath18 coefficients evaluated in @xcite and the @xmath16 function given by @xmath19 \right\ } \
, \label{eq : gpropdr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath20 is the scale of regularization and @xmath21 is a subtraction constant which is chosen by fits to the data .
( [ eq : bs1 ] ) is nothing but the bethe salpeter equation where the kernel @xmath15 is given by the lowest order chiral amplitude .
in @xcite it was also found that the subtraction constant is easily related to the cut off employed in @xcite , and hence the equivalence of the n / d method of @xcite and the bethe salpeter equation of @xcite was established .
yet , the n / d method with the dimensionally regularized @xmath16 function is preferable to extend the approach to higher energies .
the structure of the @xmath12 matrix in eq .
( [ eq : bs1 ] ) allows for the existence of poles which correspond to resonances that we call dynamically generated , since they appear thanks to the multiple scattering implicit in the bethe salpeter equation , with the lowest order amplitudes playing the role of the potential . in this sense , both in @xcite and @xcite , as well as in @xcite , one finds very clearly the @xmath22 resonance ( see fig .
1 ) , which has been claimed for long to be a quasibound state of @xmath23 .
more novel have been the findings of @xcite where the same approach of @xcite , with the subtraction constants evaluated from the unique cut off in all channels of @xcite , has lead to two new resonances , which we identify with the @xmath1 and the @xmath2 . in the amplitudes in fig . 2
one can see how the @xmath1 shows up both in the real and imaginary parts of the amplitudes .
one of the interesting findings concerning the @xmath1 state is that it couples very strongly to the @xmath24 states , and quite weakly to the other channels , which allows one to identify the @xmath1 with a quasibound state of @xmath24 .
even more interesting are the findings of @xcite , where using also subtraction constants of the natural size found in the study of the @xmath13 sector , one finds a resonance for @xmath25 which could be identified in principle with the @xmath4 or @xmath26 @xmath27 resonances .
however , a detailed study of the partial decay widths of the found resonance ( which are obtained from the residues of the transition amplitudes at the pole in the second riemann sheet of the complex plane ) , clearly shows that this resonance is at odds with the properties of the @xmath26 , and by elimination can only correspond to the @xmath4 state , hence allowing one to theoretically determine the spin and parity for this resonance as @xmath28 , which is unknown in the particle data book .
at the same time one makes predictions for the partial decay rates of this resonance which are also unknown so far .
one of the results in the study of @xcite is the good description of the low energy cross sections of @xmath29 to different channels . the success of this theory has allowed us to revise the problem of the scattering length of @xmath7 , which has been approached before @xcite . using the fixed centre approximation to the faddeev equations , proved to be excellent for this problem in @xcite ,
we have studied this scattering length in @xcite .
the problem is subtle since there is no convergence of the expansion of the multiple scattering series implicit in the faddeev equations .
second , the results are quite sensitive to the input used for the @xmath23 amplitudes . the chiral approach has allowed one to readdress this latter issue from a new perspective in which special attention is given to questions of unitarity , analyticity , and resonance properties , which make the new amplitudes quite accurate in principle .
the results obtained in our approach are @xmath30 fm , which differ appreciably from the results quoted as best in ref .
@xcite in their multichannel approach of @xmath31 fm .
this quantity is one of the important quantities to be measured in the near future at frascati in the dear experiment @xcite and should put further constraints on the theoretical approaches , and , in particular , a challenge to the chiral unitary theory which makes these novel predictions .
another of the applications of this chiral unitary approach in the strange sector is the evaluation of the @xmath8 selfenergy in the nuclear medium .
pauli exclusion effects in the intermediate states were taken into account in @xcite , which lead to a shift of the @xmath22 resonance to higher energies and a considerable attraction on the kaon . a further selfconsistent treatment of the problem , including the calculated kaon selfenergy in the intermediate meson baryon loop functions , @xcite , moved the resonance back and produced a moderate attraction .
further work in @xcite taking into account the renormalization of the intermediate pions and also the baryon selfenergies , produced new modifications leading to wider @xmath8 spectral functions and still a moderate @xmath8 attraction .
this attraction is only of the order of @xmath32 mev at @xmath33 and threshold , and moderately dependent on the energy .
it is surprising that this potential turns out to be so small when it was claimed in the past to be of the order of 200 mev to be able to interpret the data on @xmath8 atoms .
yet , it was proved in @xcite that with this potential one could obtain a good description of @xmath8 atoms , something that has been corroborated later on in @xcite and @xcite .
this potential also leads to very deeply bound @xmath8 states , with about 30 - 40 mev binding , but with very large widths of the order of 80 - 100 mev . with a potential of this type
there are no hopes that one can obtain narrow deeply bound @xmath8 states as claimed in @xcite .
the reason for the claim in that latter work is that a large binding energy is obtained , of the order of those used in the absence of sefconsistency in previous works , and also that many decay channels , which would be still open at these energies ( like @xmath34 ) , and which are evaluated in @xcite , are omitted in @xcite .
another outcome of these calculations is that kaon condensation in neutron stars is far more unlikely than has been assumed in the past .
the weak decay of @xmath9 hypernuclei and particularly , the neutron to proton induced decay ratio , @xmath10 , has been a battlefield for years , with simple models based on just one pion exchange providing values around 0.1 for this ratio , while experimentally one had values around unity or bigger , albeit with large errors .
a thorough recent study of this process , including kaon exchange and correlated and uncorrelated two pion exchange , was done in @xcite , where good results for the total rates were found for different nuclei and a ratio @xmath10 of the order of 0.54 was found for all nuclei .
the contribution of the correlated two pion exchange was done following the lines of the work for @xmath35 exchange in the @xmath36 interaction of @xcite , where no @xmath35 was put but was simulated by the interaction of two pions in the scalar isoscalar sector .
similar results for @xmath10 have also been obtained more recently in @xcite .
the still puzzling thing is that , in spite of the apparently quite thorough work done in @xcite , there seems to be still discrepancies with the latest and most accurate analysis from the experimental point of view of @xcite , which provides values bigger than one for the @xmath10 ratio , with errors small enough to make the results incompatible with those of @xcite .
the puzzle has been solved recently .
the proton spectra of @xcite were analyzed using the code of @xcite that takes into account the final state interaction of the nucleons after the @xmath9 decay .
this code contained one fatal error and has been corrected recently @xcite , leading to quite different spectra than those obtained in the original work .
the experimental results of @xcite have also been corrected to the light of the new results in @xcite , with the outcome that the new values for @xmath10 are of the order of 0.5 - 0.6 @xcite , which are in perfect agreement with the theoretical results in @xcite .
a short overview of different problems related to the field of few body physics in strong and weak interactions have been made , with the common denominator that they could be faced with fresh light from the new perspective provided by the unitary extensions of chiral perturbation theory .
the short overview here has served to show the potential of this approach to face different problems at intermediate energies , allowing one to establish connections which could not be done prior to the introduction of these techniques .
unitarized chiral perturbation theory is thus proving to be a a quite useful tool to address hadron and nuclear physics at intermediate energies , providing both a systematic working technique , as well as some novel understanding on the nature of those mesonic and hadronic resonances which could not be accommodated in the traditional quark models .
99 n. kaiser , p. b. siegel and w. weise , nucl .
a594 ( 1995 ) 325 n. kaiser , t. waas and w. weise , nucl .
a612 ( 1997 ) 297 j.a .
oller , e. oset and a. ramos , prog .
45 ( 2000 ) 157 j.a .
oller and u.g .
meissner , phys .
b500 ( 2001 ) 263 e. oset and a. ramos , nucl .
phys . a635 ( 1998 ) 99 e. oset , a. ramos and c. bennhold , phys .
b537 , 99 ( 2002 ) a. ramos , e. oset and c. bennhold , nucl - th/0204044 , phys .
lett . in print
g. toker , a. gal and j. m. eisenberg , nucl .
phys . a362 ( 1982 ) 405 .
m. torres , r. h. dalitz and a. deloff , phys .
b174 ( 1986 ) 213 .
a. deloff , phys .
c61 ( 2000 ) 024004 .
kamalov , e. oset , a. ramos , nucl .
a690 ( 2001 ) 494 c. guaraldo et al . ,
a623 ( 1997 ) 311c .
v. koch , phys .
b337 ( 1994 ) 7 t. waas , n. kaiser and w. weise , phys .
b365 ( 1996 ) 12 m. lutz , phys .
lett . b426 ( 1998 ) 12 a. ramos and e. oset , nucl .
a671 ( 2000 ) 481 s. hirenzaki , y. okumura , h. toki , e. oset and a. ramos , phys .
c61 ( 2000 ) 055205 a. baca , c. garcia - recio and j. nieves , nucl .
a673 ( 2000 ) 335 a. cieply , e. friedman , a. gal and j. mares , nucl .
a696 ( 2001)173 y. akaishi and t. yamazaki , phys .
c65 ( 2002 ) 044005 e. oset , h. toki , m. mizobe and t.t .
takahashi , prog .
103 ( 2000 ) 351 d. jido , e. oset and j.e .
palomar , nucl .
a694 ( 2001 ) 525 a. parreno and a. ramos , phys .
c65 ( 2002 ) 015204 o. hashimoto et al .
88 ( 2002 ) 042503 a. ramos , m.j .
vicente - vacas and e. oset , phys .
c55 ( 1997 ) 735 , erratum - ibid.c66 ( 2002 ) 039903 h. outa , talk at panic2002 conference , osaka , october 2002 . | combination unitary techniques chiral dynamics of meson baryon systems used in @xcite low - energy @xmath11 scattering reached maturity systematic applied to physical processes idea use unitarity constraints in coupled channels imaginary part inverse of scattering @xmath12 matrix dispersion relations construct whole @xmath12 matrix @xmath13 sector n / d dispersion relation method applied in @xcite @xmath12 matrix in coupled channels written as @xmath14^{-1} @xmath15 obtained from lowest order chiral lagrangian for meson baryon interaction @xmath16 regularized loop function of meson baryon propagators function @xmath15 given by @xmath17 @xmath18 coefficients evaluated in @xcite @xmath16 function by @xmath19 @xmath20 scale of regularization @xmath21 subtraction constant chosen by data bethe salpeter equation kernel @xmath15 given by lowest order chiral amplitude subtraction constant related to cut off @xcite equivalence of n / d method @xcite bethe salpeter equation establishedn / d method with dimensionally regularized @xmath16 function preferable approach to higher energies structure @xmath12 matrix in eq allows poles to resonances dynamically generated thanks multiple scattering in bethe salpeter equation lowest order amplitudes potential @xcite @xcite @xcite finds @xmath22 resonance fig . 1 ) quasibound state of @xmath23 findings of @xcite same approach subtraction constants from unique cut off all channels lead to two new resonances @xmath1 and @xmath2 amplitudes in fig . 2 @xmath1 shows up in real imaginary parts amplitudes @xmath1 couples strongly to @xmath24 states weakly to other channels identify @xmath1 with quasibound state of @xmath24 findings of @xcite using subtraction constants natural size @xmath13 sector resonance for @xmath25 identified with @xmath4 or @xmath26 @xmath27 resonancesdetailed study of partial decay widths of found resonance obtained from residues transition amplitudes at pole second riemann sheet complex plane shows resonance at odds with properties @xmath26 correspond to @xmath4 state determine spin and parity for resonance as @xmath28 unknown in particle data book predictions for partial decay rates unknown study @xcite description low energy cross sections of @xmath29 to different channels success theory revise problem scattering length of @xmath7 approached before @xcite using fixed centre approximation to faddeev equations studied scattering length in @xcite problem subtle no convergence of expansion of multiple scattering series in faddeev equations results sensitive to input for @xmath23 amplitudes chiral approach issue new perspective attention to questions unitarity analyticity resonance properties new amplitudes accurate results are @xmath30 fm differ from results in @xcite in multichannel approach of @xmath31 fm quantity important to be measured at frascati in experiment @xcite constraints on theoretical approaches challenge to chiral unitary theory novel predictionschiral unitary approach evaluation @xmath8 selfenergy in nuclear medium pauli exclusion effects in intermediate states in @xcite lead to shift @xmath22 resonance to higher energies attraction on kaon further selfconsistent treatment calculated kaon selfenergy in intermediate meson baryon loop functions @xcite moved resonance back produced moderate attraction further work in @xcite renormalization intermediate pions baryon selfenergies produced new modifications to wider @xmath8 spectral functions moderate @xmath8 attraction attraction @xmath32 mev at @xmath33 threshold moderately dependent on energy potential small claimed 200 mev data @xmath8 atoms proved in @xcite potential good description of @xmath8 atoms corroborated later in @xcite potential leads to deeply bound @xmath8 states with 30 - 40 mev binding large widths 80 - 100 mev potential no hopes obtain narrow deeply bound @xmath8 states as claimed in @xcite claim large binding energy obtained previous works many decay channels open at energies @xmath34 evaluated omitted in @xciteoutcome calculations kaon condensation in neutron stars unlikely than assumed weak decay of @xmath9 hypernuclei neutron to proton induced decay ratio @xmath10 battlefield for years simple models one pion exchange values around 0.1 for ratio experimentally one values around unity or bigger large errors recent study including kaon exchange correlated uncorrelated two pion exchange in @xcite good results for total rates for different nuclei ratio @xmath10 0.54 for all nuclei contribution of correlated two pion exchange work @xmath35 exchange in @xmath36 interaction @xcite simulated by two pions scalar isoscalar sector similar results for @xmath10 obtained in @xcite discrepancies with latest analysis of @xcite provides values bigger than one for @xmath10 ratio errors small results incompatible with @xcite puzzle solved recently proton spectra of @xcite analyzed using code final interaction after @xmath9 decay code contained one fatal error corrected recently different spectra original workexperimental results @xcite corrected new results new values for @xmath10 0.5 - 0.6 @xcite with theoretical results overview of problems few body physics in strong weak interactions perspective chiral perturbation theory potential approach problems intermediate energies connections unitarized chiral perturbation theory useful tool hadron nuclear physics at intermediate energies systematic technique novel understanding mesonic hadronic resonances traditional quark models n. kaiser p. b. siegel w. weise , nucl . a594 ( 1995 ) 325 kaiser weise nucl a612 ( 1997 ) 297 j oller e. oset a. ramos prog . 45 ( 2000 ) 157 oller meissner phys . b500 ( 2001 ) 263 oset. ramos phys . a635 ( 1998 ) 99 e. oset a. ramos c. bennhold phys . b537 99 ( 2002 ) nucl - th/0204044 phys. g. toker , a. gal j. m. eisenberg , nucl . phys . a362 ( 1982 ) 405torres dalitz deloff b174 ( 1986 ) 213 deloff c61 2000 ) 024004 kamalov oset ramos a690 2001 ) 494 guaraldo a623 ( 1997 ) 311c koch b337 1994 ) waas kaiser weise b365 1996 ) lutz b426 1998 ) ramos oset a671 ( 2000 ) 481 hirenzaki okumura toki oset ramos c61 ( 2000 ) 055205 baca garcia recio nieves a673 ( 2000 ) 335 cieply gal mares a696 2001 akaishi yamazaki c65 ( 2002 ) 044005 oset toki mizobe takahashi 103 ( 2000 ) 351 jido oset palomar a694 ( 2001 ) 525 parreno ramos c65 ( 2002 ) 015204 hashimoto 88 ( 2002 ) 042503 ramos vicente vacas oset c55 ( 1997 ) 735.c66 ( 2002 ) 039903 outa panic2002 conference osaka october 2002 | 0.437494 | 3,015 | 1,591 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,438 | as part of a larger project to estimate the @xmath0 decay constant , we are recalculating @xmath1 using a variational smearing method in an effort to improve accuracy .
preliminary results for the static @xmath2 parameter and hqet two point functions are also presented . | the extraction of ckm matrix elements from experimental data requires the calculation of qcd matrix elements of operators involving the bottom quark @xcite . for a number of years
the milc collaboration has been doing a systematic study of the @xmath0 decay constant @xcite .
the difficulty of simulating the bottom quark , with its mass larger than current feasible inverse lattice spacings , was overcome by interpolating between the results of simulations using wilson quarks with masses around the charm mass and those from static simulations ( infinite mass ) .
unfortunately , for some of the simulations the @xmath3 results were not useable .
these results came as a by - product of the hopping parameter expansion of the heavy quark , and for technical reasons had significant contamination by higher momentum intermediate states when the physical volume was large @xcite .
in addition , it is well known that the poor signal to noise ratio of the static simulations makes it important to use an efficient smearing method . to provide @xmath3 results on all lattices , and to reduce the errors even in the cases where the results were previously available
, we have started a set of static - light simulations using a variational smearing method .
the computational cost of our current implementation of the fft on parallel machines , prohibited the use of a more sophisticated smearing technique such as most @xcite , so we use the following basis of smearing functions : @xmath4 the parameters @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 were obtained from uncorrelated fits to the kentucky group s measured wave functions of static - light mesons ( at @xmath9 ) @xcite .
the @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 parameters were scaled to the appropriate value for a given @xmath10 , using the estimates of the lattice spacing .
because of uncertainties in the lattice spacing , and to have the flexibility to choose different smearing functions for each kappa value , two additional sets of the parameters were chosen .
thus a variational smearing matrix of order ten ( including the local operator ) is used in the simulations .
the static quark is smeared _ relative _ to the light quark using standard fft methods .
.simulation parameters [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] chirally extrapolating the @xmath11 results to @xmath12 and converting the results to the one loop rg invariant @xmath13 parameter , we obtain the preliminary value of @xmath14 ( statistical error only ) .
this result is consistent with the values obtained from quenched simulations using wilson fermions @xcite @xcite .
to calculate the form factors of the semi - leptonic decays of the @xmath6 meson , we want to follow a strategy similar to the one used in the @xmath0 simulations , except that we will combine the results of heavy quark effective field theory ( hqet ) with the analogous propagating quark calculations , to allow the final results to be interpolated to the @xmath6 meson mass . as a `` warm up exercise ''
we studied the two point function of a hqet - light meson .
this exercise allows us to investigate the smearing of the quarks in the @xmath6 meson and to study the nonperturbative renormalization of the velocity ( a peculiarity of lattice hqet ) both of which are important prerequisites to the calculation of form factors .
we have implemented the hqet propagator equation introduced by mandula and ogilvie @xcite .
the two - point function for an hqet - light meson at finite residual momentum @xmath15 and bare velocity @xmath16 is @xmath17 when there is no excited state contamination , the correlator has the form @xmath18 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the smeared and local matrix elements .
the dispersion relation for an hqet - light meson is @xcite @xmath21 where @xmath22 is equal to the energy obtained in the static simulation . here
@xmath23 is the renormalized velocity . as a pilot study we generated 20 correlators at @xmath24 with a light
quark kappa value of 0.160 .
so far , a single exponential source , as in the static simulations , was used .
[ fig : hqet_ps ] shows the effective mass plots for a hqet - light meson at zero residual momentum with bare velocities only in the @xmath25 direction of 0.1 , 0.5 , and 0.8 ; the static effective mass plot is also included ( equivalent to zero velocity ) .
the single exponential produces almost usable plateaus for all three velocities the plateaus should improve when we use variational smearing . the signal to noise ratio does not decrease rapidly with increasing velocity .
the renormalization of the velocity is caused by the breaking of the lorentz symmetry by the lattice .
this renormalization is required in the calculation of form factors such as the isgur - wise function @xcite . our preferred way to extract the renormalization is to use the dispersion relation in eq ( [ eq : hqetdisp ] ) with the energy taken from simulations .
this approach seems to us @xcite @xcite to be simpler than the one used by mandula and ogilvie @xcite .
an estimate of the velocity renormalization can be obtained from the data in fig . [
fig : hqet_ps ] , using naive fits to the effective masses and using eq ( [ eq : hqetdisp ] ) with zero residual momentum . for the bare velocity of 0.5 ( 0.8 ) in the @xmath25 direction , the renormalized velocity was approximately eighty ( sixty five ) percent of the bare velocity . with higher statistics and better smearing a more sophisticated analysis will be done .
the perturbative calculation of mandula and ogilvie @xcite also gave a renormalized velocity smaller than the bare velocity .
this work is supported in part by the u.s .
department of energy and the nsf we would like to thank terry draper for discussions on hqet and @xmath2 , and joe christensen for providing us with the coefficients for the @xmath2 parameter calculation .
the runs are being done on the cornell theory center s sp2 , and on the 512 node paragon at the oak ridge center for computational science . ,
_ _ nucl .
. suppl . _ ) _ * 42 * , 388 ( 1995 ) ; ( milc collaboration ) c. bernard _
_ , _ _ nucl
. phys .
( _ proc .
_ ) _ * 47 * , 459 ( 1996 ) ; milc collaboration ( presented by c. bernard ) , these proceedings . | extraction of ckm matrix elements from data requires calculation of qcd matrix elements of operators bottom quark @xcite milc collaboration @xmath0 decay constant @xcite difficulty simulating bottom quark with mass larger than inverse lattice spacings overcome by interpolating between results simulations using wilson quarks charm mass and static simulations ( infinite mass ) some simulations @xmath3 results not useable results by - product of hopping parameter expansion heavy quark had contamination by higher momentum intermediate states when physical volume large poor signal to noise ratio of static simulations important efficient smearing method provide results on lattices reduce errors started static - light simulations using variational smearing method computational cost of current implementation more sophisticated smearing technique basis smearing functions parameters obtained from uncorrelated fits to kentucky group s measured wave functions of static - light mesons parameters scaled to appropriate value for @xmath10 using estimates lattice spacinguncertainties in lattice spacing flexibility smearing functions two additional sets parameters chosen variational smearing matrix ten local operator used in simulations static quark smeared to light quark using standard fft methods parameters extrapolating @xmath11 results to @xmath12 converting to invariant @xmath13 parameter preliminary value of @xmath14 statistical error only consistent with simulations using wilson fermions @xcite form factors semi - leptonic decays @xmath6 meson strategy similar @xmath0 simulations results heavy quark effective field theory propagating quark calculations final results interpolated to @xmath6 meson mass studied two point function of hqet - light meson smearing quarks nonperturbative renormalization of velocity prerequisites calculation form factors implemented hqet propagator equation by mandula ogilvie @xcite two - point function for hqet - light meson at finite residual momentum @xmath15 bare velocity @xmath16 @xmath17 no excited state contamination correlator has form @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 are smeared local matrix elementsdispersion relation hqet - light meson @xcite @xmath21 @xmath22 equal energy static simulation @xmath23 renormalized velocity pilot study generated 20 correlators at @xmath24 light quark kappa value 0.160 single exponential source used fig hqet_ps effective mass plots - light meson zero residual momentum bare velocities @xmath25 direction 0.1 0.5 0.8 static mass plot included zero velocity single exponential produces plateaus three velocities plateaus improve variational smearing signal to noise ratio decrease increasing velocity renormalization velocity caused breaking lorentz symmetry lattice renormalization required calculation form factors isgur - wise function extract renormalization dispersion relation eq ( hqetdisp with energy from simulations approach simpler than mandula ogilvie @xcite estimate velocity renormalization from data fig . naive fits masses eq ( zero residual momentum bare velocity 0.5 ( 0.8 ) @xmath25 direction renormalized velocity eighty percent bare velocity higher statistics better smearing sophisticated analysis perturbative calculation of mandula ogilvie @xcite renormalized velocity smaller than bare velocitywork supported by u.s department energy nsf terry draper hqet @xmath2 joe christensen coefficients @xmath2 parameter calculation runs done on cornell theory center s sp2 512 node paragon oak ridge center computational science nucl. suppl. 42 * 388 ( 1995 ) milc collaboration c. bernard nucl. . 47 * 459 ( 1996 ) milc collaboration presented c. bernard proceedings | 0.262105 | 1,498 | 749 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,439 | in type ii seesaw model of neutrino mass generation , we study a remarkable signal of same - sign tetra - lepton ( ss4l ) signal at the large hadron collider .
when doubly charged higgs is lightest , the heavier singly charged or neutral higgs boson produces a doubly charged higgs boson through its fast gauge decay .
this leads to a novel signature of same - sign tetra - leptons resulting from a pair production of same - sign doubly charged higgs bosons .
we study production cross section for the ss4l signal in parameter space of the mass splitting among triplet components and the triplet vacuum expectation value at the lhc . | one of the important question in particle physics is the origin of neutrino masses and mixing . in type ii seesaw model @xcite , higgs triplet coupling to lepton doublet can generate neutrino mass terms once it develops non - trivial vacuum expectation value .
a distinct feature of this model is the presence of doubly charged higgs bosons which can give a very clean signal at collider experiments @xcite@xcite .
moreover it can also explain the deviation in higgs - to - diphoton rate as measured by cms and atlas @xcite . in this work @xcite
, we study a novel signature of same - sign tetra - leptons ( ss4l ) allowed in some parameter space of the type ii seesaw model that has not been studied so far .
when the mass splitting among triplet components is sizable and the doubly charged higgs boson is the lightest , the electroweak gauge interaction allows a fast decay of the neutral or singly charged component of the higgs triplet into the lighter singly or doubly charged component .
therefore , pair - produced higgs triplet components can end up with a pair of same - sign doubly charged higgs bosons leading to same - sign tetra - leptons if their leptonic yukawa coupling is larger than the ratio of the triplet and doublet higgs vacuum expectation values .
the ss4l final state , which is almost background free , provides an excellent new channel to test the model and probe sizes of the higgs triplet vacuum expectation value and the mass splitting among the higgs triplet components at the lhc .
in this model , the higgs sector of the standard model is extended with a @xmath0 @xmath1 scalar triplet @xmath2 in addition to a sm - higgs doublet @xmath3 .
the leptonic part of the lagrangian which generates neutrino masses is @xmath4 and the scalar potential is @xmath5 ^ 2+\lambda_3\mbox{det}(\delta^\dagger\delta ) + \lambda_4(\phi^\dagger\phi)\mbox{tr}(\delta^\dagger\delta)\\ & + & \lambda_5(\phi^\dagger\tau_i\phi)\mbox{tr}(\delta^\dagger\tau_i\delta ) + \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\mu(\phi^ti\tau_2\delta\phi)+\mbox{h.c.}\right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] after the electroweak symmetry breaking with @xmath6 , the @xmath7 term in eq .
( [ pot ] ) gives rise to the vacuum expectation value of the triplet @xmath8 where @xmath9 with @xmath7 being real and positive .
there are seven physical massive scalar eigenstates denoted by @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 . under the condition that @xmath15 where @xmath16 , the mixing among doublet and triplet components is too small and thus the first five states are mainly from the triplet and the last from the doublet .
we write the masses of the higgs bosons as @xmath17 the mass of @xmath14 is given by @xmath18 as usual .
the mass splitting among triplet scalars can be approximated as @xmath19 furthermore , the sign of the coupling @xmath20 determines two mass hierarchies among the triplet components : @xmath21 for @xmath22 ; or @xmath23 for @xmath24 . in this work ,
we focus on the scenario , where the doubly charged scalar @xmath25 is the lightest and thus it decays only to @xmath26 or @xmath27 , while @xmath28 ( @xmath11 ) decays mainly to @xmath29 ( @xmath30 ) unless the mass splitting @xmath31 is negligibly small . for more details ,
see , e.g. , ref .
@xcite .
the mass splitting @xmath32 between @xmath12 and @xmath13 plays a crucial role for ss4l signal .
the @xmath7 term in eq .
( [ pot ] ) , which is lepton number violating , generates not only the triplet vev @xmath33 but also @xmath34 : @xmath35 for a preferable choice of @xmath33 , @xmath32 can be comparable to the total decay rate of the neutral scalars , @xmath36 , enhancing the ss4l signal .
depending on the triplet mass splitting @xmath31 and the triplet vacuum expectation value @xmath33 , the triplet scalars have different decay properties .
when @xmath37 is the lightest , the possible decay channels for the triplet scalars are shown in table .
[ decay ] .
the decays of triplet scalars can be classified into three modes , a ) di - leptonic mode : which is proportional to yukawa coupling @xmath38 , b ) quark / di - boson mode : controlled by @xmath39 , and c ) gauge decay : due to @xmath40 gauge interaction which dominates if allowed kinematically .
.[decay]possible decay channels for the triplet higgs bosons for @xmath41 . [ cols="<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] in fig .
[ invmass ] , we plot the reconstructed @xmath25 mass from the sample of selected ss4l events for both nh and ih neutrino mass scenarios at lhc14 with 100 fb@xmath42 integrated luminosity .
the peaks in all plots correspond to @xmath43 decays while the broad part ( off - peak ) of distribution correspond to @xmath44 decays .
we point out that a remarkable signal of ss4l , @xmath45 , is allowed in the type ii seesaw mechanism .
such a signal at the lhc strongly depends on the mass splitting @xmath31 and the triplet vev @xmath46 when the doubly charged component @xmath25 is the lightest , larger @xmath31 allows more efficient gauge decay of the neutral component to the singly charged one and then to the doubly charged one .
thus , a pair production of the triplet components at colliders can end up with producing @xmath47 whose branching fraction to ss4l becomes larger for smaller @xmath33 .
another crucial ingredient for increasing the ss4l signal number is the @xmath12-@xmath13 mixing parameter @xmath48 which becomes smaller for smaller @xmath33 and larger @xmath31 .
therefore , there appear optimal values of the model parameters which maximize the same - sign tetra - lepton signal .
after studying such a behavior in the @xmath49 plane , we identified a benchmark point with @xmath50 gev and @xmath51 gev for maximized the signal numbers at the lhc . after making the typical selection cuts to identify four same - sign leptons
, we have shown that one can obtain sizable event numbers for @xmath52 gev with integrated luminosity of 100 fb@xmath42 at the lhc14 to reconstruct the doubly charged higgs mass in both cases of the normal and inverted neutrino mass hierarchy .
99 # 1#2#3phys .
* b#1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3nucl .
* b#1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3phys .
* d#1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3phys .
# 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3mod . phys .
* a#1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3phys . rep .
* # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3science * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3astrophys .
j. * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3eur .
j. * c#1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3jhep * # 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 # 1#2#3prog .
# 1 * ( # 2 ) # 3 m. magg and c. wetterich , phys .
b * 94 * ( 1980 ) 61 ; t. p. cheng and l. -f .
li , phys .
d * 22 * ( 1980 ) 2860 ; j.f .
gunion , j. grifols , a. mendez , b. kayser and f. olness , ; r. vega and d. dicus , ; j.f .
gunion , r. vega and j. wudka , ; r. godbole , b. mukhopadhyaya and m. nowakowski , ; k. cheung , r. phillips and a. pilaftsis , ; k. huitu , j. maalampi , a. pietila and m. raidal , ; t.g .
rizzo , ; n. lepore , b. thorndyke , h. nadeau and d. london , ; b. dion _ et .
al . _ , ; a. datta and a. raychaudhuri , ; e. ma , m. raidal and u. sarkar , ; ; a. g. akeroyd and m. aoki , phys . rev .
d * 72 * ( 2005 ) 035011 ; t. han , b. mukhopadhyaya , z. si and k. wang , phys .
d * 76 * ( 2007 ) 075013 .
m. muhlleitner and m. spira , phys .
d * 68 * , 117701 ( 2003 ) [ hep - ph/0305288 ] .
s. kanemura and k. yagyu , phys .
d * 85 * , 115009 ( 2012 ) , a. g. akeroyd and s. moretti , phys .
d * 86 * , 035015 ( 2012 ) , e. j. chun , h. m. lee and p. sharma , jhep * 1211 * , 106 ( 2012 ) , e. j. chun and p. sharma . arxiv:1301.1437 [ hep - ph ] .
e. j. chun and p. sharma , jhep * 1208 * , 162 ( 2012 ) [ arxiv:1206.6278 [ hep - ph ] ] .
e. j. chun , k. y. lee and s. c. park , phys .
b * 566 * ( 2003 ) 142 [ hep - ph/0304069 ] .
a. g. akeroyd and h. sugiyama , phys . rev .
d * 84 * ( 2011 ) 035010 [ arxiv:1105.2209 [ hep - ph ] ] .
a. g. akeroyd , s. moretti and h. sugiyama , phys .
d * 85 * ( 2012 ) 055026 [ arxiv:1201.5047 [ hep - ph ] ] . | important question particle physics origin of neutrino masses mixing type ii seesaw model higgs triplet lepton doublet neutrino mass non - trivial vacuum expectation value distinct feature doubly charged higgs bosons clean signal at collider experiments deviation in higgs - to - diphoton rate measured by cms atlas novel signature same - sign tetra - leptons ( ss4l parameter space mass splitting among triplet components sizable doubly charged higgs boson lightest electroweak gauge interaction allows fast decay neutral into lighter pair - produced higgs triplet components same - doubly charged higgs bosons same - sign tetra - leptons if leptonic yukawa coupling larger than ratio triplet doublet higgs vacuum expectation values ss4l final state almost background free provides channel test model probe higgs triplet vacuum expectation value mass splitting higgs sector extended with scalar triplet sm - higgs doublet @xmath3leptonic part lagrangian generates neutrino masses @xmath4 scalar potential @xmath5\lambda_3\delta^\dagger\delta\lambda_4(\phi^\dagger\phi)\mbox \lambda_5(\phi^\dagger\tau_i\phi)\mbox\delta\delta\left{1{2}}(\phi^ti\tau_2\delta\phi)+\mbox{h.c.}\right electroweak symmetry @xmath6 @xmath7 term vacuum expectation value triplet @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath7 real positive seven physical massive scalar eigenstates @xmath10 @xmath15 @xmath16 mixing doublet triplet components small first five states from triplet last doublet write masses higgs bosons @xmath17 mass @xmath14 @xmath18 mass splitting triplet scalars @xmath19 sign coupling @xmath20 determines two mass hierarchies triplet components @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24focus on scenario doubly charged scalar @xmath25 lightest decays to @xmath26 or @xmath27 @xmath28 decays to @xmath29 ( ) unless mass splitting @xmath31 small mass splitting @xmath32 between and for ss4l signal @xmath7 term lepton number violating generates triplet vev @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath32 comparable to decay rate neutral scalars @xmath36 enhancing ss4l signal triplet mass splitting @xmath31 triplet vacuum expectation value @xmath33 triplet scalars different decay properties @xmath37 lightest possible decay channels for triplet scalars shown in table . decays scalars classified three modes di - leptonic mode proportional to yukawa coupling quark / di - boson mode controlled @xmath39 gauge decay due to @xmath40 gauge interaction channels for triplet higgs bosons for @xmath41 fig .plot reconstructed @xmath25 mass from ss4l events nh ih neutrino mass scenarios at lhc14 with 100 fb@xmath42 luminosity peaks correspond to @xmath43 decays @xmath44 decays remarkable signal ss4l @xmath45 allowed in type ii seesaw mechanism depends on mass splitting @xmath31 triplet vev @xmath46 doubly charged component @xmath25 lightest larger @xmath31 allows gauge decay neutral pair production triplet components colliders @xmath47 branching fraction ss4l larger for smaller @xmath33 increasing ss4l signal number @xmath12-@xmath13 mixing parameter @xmath48 smaller for @xmath33 @xmath31 optimal values model parameters maximize same - sign tetra - lepton signal benchmark point with @xmath50 gev @xmath51 gev for signal numbers at lhc selection cuts four same - sign leptons sizable event numbers for @xmath52 gev with integrated luminosity of 100 fb@xmath42 at lhc14 reconstruct doubly charged higgs mass normal inverted neutrino mass hierarchyb#1 2 # 3 # 1#2#3phys d#1 3 1#2#3phys 1#2#3mod . a#1 2 3 # 1#2#3phys . rep 3 1#2#3science 3 1#2#3astrophys. 1 3 # 1#2#3eur . c#1 2 3 # 1#2#3jhep 3 1#2#3prog . m. magg c. wetterich phys . 94 1980 ) 61. cheng l. -f li phys . d * 22 * 1980 ) 2860 j.f . gunion j. grifols. mendez kayser f. olness r. vega d. dicus gunion vega wudka godbole. nowakowski k. cheung. phillips. pilaftsis. huitu j. maalampi. pietila m. raidal rizzo. lepore thorndyke nadeau d. london dion a. datta. raychaudhuri e. ma m. raidal u. sarkar a. g. akeroyd m. aoki phys . rev . d * 72 * ( 2005 ) 035011 t. han b.mukhopadhyaya z si wang phys 76 2007 ) 075013 muhlleitner spira phys 68 117701 2003 hep - ph/0305288 kanemura yagyu 85 115009 2012 g akeroyd s moretti phys 86 035015 2012 e j. chun m lee p. sharma 1211 106 2012 ) j chun p sharma arxiv:1301.1437 hep - ph j chun p sharma 1208 162 2012 ):1206.6278 hep - ph j chun k y lee park phys 566 2003 ) 142 hep - ph/0304069 akeroyd h sugiyama 84 * 2011 ) 035010 arxiv:1105.2209 hep - ph akeroyd s moretti h phys 85 2012 ) 055026 arxiv:1201.5047 hep - ph | 0.350484 | 2,546 | 1,334 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,440 | the statistical theory of the dipole flexoelectric ( fe ) polarization in liquid crystals is used to calculate the temperature dependence of order parameters , the elastic constants and the fe coefficients .
two systems with polar wedge - shaped and banana - shaped molecules are investigated . in both cases
the fe coefficients are proportional to the dipole moment component parallel to the molecule symmetry axis .
the origin of the fe effect and microscopic pictures of the distorted phases are discussed . *
keywords : * nematic liquid crystals , flexoelectric polarization , elastic constants , statistical theory . | in an ideal nematic liquid crystal the molecules are on average aligned along one common direction @xmath0 @xcite .
there is usually some deformation of the alignment and the vector @xmath1 depends on the position @xmath2 in the liquid crystal .
the free - energy density due to the distortion of the vector @xmath1 is expressed in terms of the vector derivatives and the elastic constants @xmath3 @xcite @xmath4^{2 } + { \frac { 1}{2 } } k_{3 } [ \vec{n } \times ( \nabla \times \vec{n } ) ] ^{2},\ ] ] where @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and @xmath7 are splay , twist , and bend elastic constants , respectively . in a deformed uniaxial nematic liquid crystal
, there should appear in many cases a spontaneous dielectric polarization invented by meyer @xcite @xmath8 where @xmath9 and @xmath10 are the splay and the bend flexoelectric ( fe ) coefficients , respectively .
the appearance of the spontaneous polarization in liquid crystals as a result of orientational deformations is called the flexoelectric effect . the fe coefficients and the elastic constants are macroscopic parameters that are important in practical applications of liquid crystals .
thus , it is interesting to study the connection between microscopic and macroscopic parameters in order to fasilitate new material production . in this paper
we will focus on the fe effect .
a microscopic mechanism of the fe effect was proposed by meyer @xcite , who showed that it is a steric effect due to the asymmetry of the molecular shape .
but prost and marcerou @xcite noticed that the polarization in a deformed liquid crystal can be also produced as a result of a gradient in the average density of quadrupole molecule moments . in 1976
straley developed a microscopic theory @xcite by extending the onsager theory of orientational ordering in hard - rod gases .
other mean - field theory was given by derzhanski and petrov @xcite .
the density - functional theory was derived by singh and singh @xcite , were the dipole and the quadrupole contributions to the fe coefficients were taken into account .
somoza and tarazona @xcite tried to include the effects of the relaxation in the angular distribution function of the deformed nematic .
as far as computer simulations are concerned , we would like to mention the papers by stelzer _ et al .
_ @xcite and by billeter and pelcovits @xcite , where pear - shaped molecules were studied . in this paper
, we present two systems with wedge - shaped and banana - shaped molecules . in our calculations
, we use a simple potential energy of interactions which allows us to obtain the macroscpic parameters of the systems and to understand the fe effect origin in the deformed phases .
the microscopic free energy for the system can be derived in the thermodynamic limit ( @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 ) from the born - bogoliubov - green - kirkwood - yvon ( bbgky ) hierarchy @xcite or as the cluster expansion for the uniaxial systems @xcite .
the total free energy @xmath14 consists of the entropy term and the interaction term , namely @xmath15 where @xmath16 - 1 \ } , \\
\beta f_{int } & = & - { \frac { 1}{2 } } \int { d\vec{r}_1}{dr_1}{d\vec{r}_2}{dr_2 } g(\vec{r}_1,r_1 ) g(\vec{r}_2,r_2 ) f_{12}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath17 is the mayer function , @xmath18 is the potential energy of interactions , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , and @xmath21 is related to the ideal gas properties .
the normalization of the one - particle distribution function @xmath22 is @xmath23 the equilibrium distribution @xmath22 minimizing the free energy of eq .
( [ ftotal ] ) satisfies the equation @xmath24 - \int { d\vec{r}_2}{dr_2 } g(\vec{r}_2,r_2 ) f_{12 } = \mbox{const}.\ ] ] in the case of the homogeneous uniaxial nematic phase , the distribution function depends only on the molecule orientation @xmath25 .
we will further assume that @xmath22 depends on a single argument @xmath26 , where @xmath1 determines the phase orientation .
this is satisfied exactly for the molecules with @xmath27 symmetry but we expect that it is plausible for the banana - shaped molecules with @xmath28 symmetry . the molecule electric dipole moment is defined as @xmath29 where the unit vectors @xmath30 describe the molecule orientation . in the case of the wedge - shaped molecules ,
the fe coefficients have the form @xcite @xmath31 where @xmath32 determines the molecule @xmath27 symmetry axis . in the case of the banana - shaped molecules ,
the fe coefficients can be written in the approximated form provided that @xmath33 determines the molecule @xmath28 symmetry axis and @xmath32 determines the long molecule axis @xcite @xmath34 in both cases , the fe coefficients are proportional to the dipole moment component parallel to the molecule symmetry axis .
it results from the symmetries of the interactions and of the mayer function .
the elastic constants of the uniaxial nematic phase are @xcite @xmath35
the calculations were performed for the square - well potential energy of the form @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the distance between molecules , @xmath38 , and @xmath39 depends on the molecule orientations and on the vector @xmath40 . for @xmath39
, we used simple expressions with three parameters , @xmath41 defines the length scale , @xmath42 defines the nematic term , and @xmath43 defines the fe term . in the case of the wedge - shaped molecules @xmath39 has the form @xmath44 + \sigma_{2 } ( \vec{\delta } \cdot \vec{n}_1 - \vec{\delta } \cdot \vec{n}_2),\ ] ] whereas for the banana - shaped molecules @xmath45
+ \sigma_{2 } ( \vec{\delta } \cdot \vec{l}_1 - \vec{\delta } \cdot \vec{l}_2).\ ] ] we used the density @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 .
the molecule volume @xmath49 was estimated from the mutually excluded volume .
the fe coefficients were expressed in @xmath50 , the elastic constants in @xmath51 , and the temperature in @xmath52 .
the potential energy of the form @xmath53 allows us to express the fe coefficients and the elastic constants as a finite series of the order parameters where the coefficients of the expansion can be calculated analitically . as a consequence
it is easy to change the set of parameters @xmath54 and to study different systems .
the temperature dependence of the order parameters and the elastic constants is similar to the known results @xcite , therefore the fe coefficients will be discussed only . in the system of the wedge - shaped molecules , on decreasing the temperature
we meet the first order transition from the isotropic to the uniaxial nematic phase at @xmath55 .
the temperature dependence of the fe coefficients is presented in fig .
the physical picture is shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] . on decreasing the temperature ,
the bend coefficient @xmath10 is almost constant while the splay coefficient @xmath9 increases monotonically .
the wedge - shaped molecules fit to the splayed structure and there is an excess of molecules pointing to the splay origin .
the induced polarization has the opposite direction . in the bend structure
the fe polarization points to the bend centre because the molecules are slightly turned in the opposite direction . in the system of the banana - shaped molecules , on decreasing the temperature
we meet the first order transition from the isotropic to the uniaxial nematic phase at @xmath56 .
the temperature dependence of the fe coefficients is presented in fig .
the physical picture is shown in fig .
the banana - shaped molecules fit to the bend structure and the fe polarization points to the bend centre . in the splayed structure
the molecules are slightly turned and the average polarization is opposite to the splay centre position .
in this paper , the statistical theory was used to study the dependence between the microscopic and macroscopic parameters of nematic liquid crystals .
the temperature dependence of the order parameters , the fe coefficients , and the elastic constants was obtained for the two systems . for the wedge - shaped molecules the bend coefficient @xmath10 is almost constant whereas the splay coefficient @xmath9 is changing monotonically . for the banana - shaped molecules the splay coefficient @xmath9 is almost constant whereas the bend coefficient @xmath10 is changing monotonically . in both cases
the fe coefficients are proportional to the molecule dipole moment component , parallel to the molecule symmetry axis .
this is the long axis of the wedge - shaped molecules and the short axis of the banana - shaped molecules .
it results from the symmetries of the interactions and of the mayer function .
in other theories , where the interactions are not explicitly used or they are more complicated , the dependence on the all dipole moment components is present .
the results are consistent with the microscopic pictures from the paper by meyer but two additional situations were taken into account , the splayed phase with banana - shaped molecules and the bend phase with wedge - shaped molecules . at present stage , the qualitative comparison between the theory and the experiment is very difficult .
the experimental data on the fe coefficients are still scarce and sometimes contradictory @xcite . on the other hand , a nontrivial dependence on the details of the chemical structure
was shown @xcite .
a small chemical modification of the molecule can generate significant change of the flexoelectricity .
thus , we would like to give only the estimates assuming typical values of the model parameters .
if we assume the molecular length @xmath57 , the interaction energy @xmath58 , and the electric dipole moment @xmath59 , then we can estimate the values of the fe coefficients @xmath60 , the elastic constants @xmath61 , and the temperature @xmath62 ( it is three / four times larger then the typical isotropic - nematic transition temperature ) . the theory should be improved in order to describe exactly real systems . for the distance @xmath39 , the general expansion proposed by blum and torruella @xcite can be applied in order to describe molecular shapes better .
the meyer function @xmath63 used in the low density limit can be replaced with the direct correlation function @xmath64 from the percus - yevick approximation . in many cases ,
liquid crystals are mixtures of different substances or different conformers and it should be taken into account . finally , it is possible to consider the fe effect in the biaxial nematic phase although this phase is still very rare .
this work was supported by the faculty of physics , astronomy and applied computer science , jagellonian university ( wrbw no .
the author is also grateful to j. spaek for his support .
a. g. petrov , _ measurements and interpretation of flexoelectricity _ , in _ physical properties of liquid crystals : nematics _ , pp .
251264 , edited by d. dunmur , a. fukuda , and g. luckhurst , inspec , the institution of electrical engineers , london , 2001 . the temperature dependence of the flexoelectric coefficients @xmath65 expressed in @xmath66 in the case of wedge - shaped molecules .
the temperature @xmath67 is expressed in @xmath52 .
the @xmath68 transition is at @xmath69 . ]
the homogeneous , the splay , and the bend phases of wedge - shaped molecules .
the solid lines denote the local direction @xmath1 .
the @xmath70 axis is the symmetry axis of the homogeneous nematic phase . in the splay phase
there is an excess of molecules pointing down to the splay origin . in the bend phase
there is an excess of molecules pointing to the left whereas the bend center is on the right . ] the temperature dependence of the flexoelectric coefficients @xmath65 expressed in @xmath71 in the case of banana - shaped molecules .
the temperature @xmath67 is expressed in @xmath52 .
the @xmath68 transition is at @xmath72 . ]
the homogeneous , the splay , and the bend phases of banana - shaped molecules .
the solid lines denote the local direction @xmath1 .
the @xmath70 axis is the symmetry axis of the homogeneous nematic phase . in the splay phase ,
molecules are slightly turned and the average polarization direction is opposite to the splay origin . in the bend phase , the molecule dipole moments point to the bend center on the right . ] | ideal nematic liquid crystal molecules aligned direction @xmath0 @xcite deformation alignment vector @xmath1 depends on position @xmath2 free - energy density due to distortion vector @xmath1 expressed in vector derivatives elastic constants @xmath3 @xcite @xmath4^{2 + 1}{2_{3 } @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 splay twist bend elastic constants deformed uniaxial nematic liquid crystal spontaneous dielectric polarization invented by meyer @xcite @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 splay bend flexoelectric fe ) coefficients spontaneous polarization orientational deformations flexoelectric effect fe coefficients elastic constants macroscopic parameters important in practical applications study connection between microscopic macroscopic parameters new material production focus on fe effect microscopic mechanism proposed by meyer steric effect due to asymmetry molecular shape prost marcerou polarization deformed liquid crystal produced gradient in average density quadrupole molecule moments 1976 straley developed microscopic theory onsager theory of orientational ordering in hard - rod gasesmean - field theory by derzhanski petrov @xcite density - functional theory by singh @xcite dipole quadrupole contributions to fe coefficients somoza tarazona @xcite effects relaxation in angular distribution function of deformed nematic computer simulations papers by stelzer @xcite billeter pelcovits @xcite pear - shaped molecules studied paper present two systems with wedge - shaped banana - shaped molecules calculations use potential energy of interactions macroscpic parameters understand fe effect origin in deformed phases microscopic free energy derived in thermodynamic limit ( @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 ) from born - bogoliubov - green - kirkwood - yvon ) hierarchy @xcite cluster expansion for uniaxial systems total free energy @xmath14 entropy term interaction term @xmath15 @xmath16 - 1 @xmath17 is mayer function @xmath18 potential energy of interactions @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 related to ideal gas propertiesnormalization one - particle distribution function @xmath22 equilibrium distribution minimizing free energy satisfies equation @xmath24 -{r_2 f{12 = \mbox homogeneous uniaxial nematic phase distribution function depends molecule orientation @xmath25 @xmath22 depends single argument @xmath26 @xmath1 determines phase orientation satisfied molecules @xmath27 symmetry plausible banana - shaped molecules @xmath28 symmetry molecule electric dipole moment defined @xmath29 unit vectors @xmath30 describe molecule orientation wedge - shaped molecules fe coefficients form @xcite @xmath31 @xmath32 determines molecule symmetry axis banana - shaped molecules coefficients approximated form @xmath33 determines symmetry axis @xmath32 molecule axis fe coefficients proportional dipole moment component parallel molecule symmetry axis results from symmetries interactions mayer function elastic constants uniaxial nematic phase @xcite @xmath35 calculations square - well potential energy @xmath36 distance molecules depends molecule orientations vector @xmath40@xmath39 used simple expressions three parameters @xmath41 length scale nematic term fe term wedge - shaped molecules @xmath39 form @xmath44 + \sigma_{2 } (\delta}_1 -_2) banana - shaped molecules @xmath45 + \sigma_{2 }\delta}_1 -_2) used density @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 molecule volume @xmath49 estimated from excluded volume fe coefficients expressed @xmath50 elastic constants @xmath51 temperature @xmath52 potential energy form @xmath53 express fe coefficients elastic constants finite series order parameters coefficients expansion calculated analitically easy to change parameters @xmath54 study different systems temperature dependence order parameters elastic constants similar known results @xcite fe coefficients discussed only wedge - shaped molecules decreasing temperature transition isotropic to uniaxial nematic phase @xmath55 temperature dependence fe coefficients presented fig . physical picture fig .temperature bend coefficient @xmath10 constant splay @xmath9 increases monotonically wedge - shaped molecules fit splayed structure excess molecules splay origin induced polarization opposite direction bend structure fe polarization points to bend centre molecules turned banana - shaped molecules temperature transition from isotropic to uniaxial nematic phase at @xmath56 temperature dependence fe coefficients presented in fig banana - shaped molecules fit bend structure fe polarization points bend centre splayed structure molecules slightly turned average polarization opposite splay centre statistical theory dependence microscopic macroscopic parameters nematic liquid crystals temperature dependence order parameters fe coefficients elastic constants obtained systems wedge - shaped molecules bend coefficient @xmath10 almost constant splay @xmath9 monotonically banana - shaped molecules splay @xmath9 almost constant bend monotonically fe coefficients proportional to molecule dipole moment component parallel molecule symmetry axis long wedge banana - results from symmetries interactions mayer functionother theories interactions not complicated dependence on dipole moment components present results consistent with microscopic pictures paper meyer two additional situations splayed phase with banana - shaped molecules bend phase wedge - shaped molecules qualitative comparison theory experiment difficult experimental data on fe coefficients scarce contradictory nontrivial dependence on chemical structure shown small chemical modification significant change flexoelectricity estimates assuming typical model parameters assume molecular length @xmath57 interaction energy @xmath58 electric dipole moment @xmath59 estimate fe coefficients @xmath60 elastic constants @xmath61 temperature @xmath62 three / four times larger typical isotropic - nematic transition temperature theory should describe real systems distance @xmath39 general expansion by blum torruella describe molecular shapes meyer function @xmath63 low density limit replaced with direct correlation function @xmath64 percus - yevick approximation liquid crystals mixtures of different substances conformers possible to consider fe effect in biaxial nematic phase rare work supported by faculty of physics astronomy applied computer science jagellonian university author grateful to j. spaek for supportpetrov measurements flexoelectricity physical properties liquid crystals nematics pp 251264 edited dunmur fukuda luckhurst institution electrical engineers london 2001 temperature dependence flexoelectric coefficients @xmath65 @xmath66 wedge - shaped molecules temperature @xmath67 transition @xmath69 homogeneous splay bend phases wedge - shaped molecules solid lines denote local direction @xmath1 @xmath70 axis symmetry axis homogeneous nematic phase splay phase excess molecules splay origin bend phase left bend center right temperature dependence flexoelectric coefficients @xmath65 @xmath71 banana - shaped molecules temperature @xmath67 @xmath52 transition @xmath72 homogeneous splay bend phases banana - shaped molecules solid lines denote local direction @xmath1 @xmath70 axis symmetry axis homogeneous nematic phase splay phase molecules slightly turned polarization opposite splay origin bend phase molecule dipole moments point bend center right | 0.437764 | 2,838 | 1,410 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,442 | the interaction of ultra - intense lasers with solid foils can be used to accelerate ions to high energies well exceeding 60 mev @xcite .
the non - linear relativistic motion of electrons in the intense laser radiation leads to their acceleration and later to the acceleration of ions .
ions can be accelerated from the front surface , the foil interior region , and the foil rear surface ( tnsa , most widely used ) , or the foil may be accelerated as a whole if sufficiently thin ( rpa ) . + here ,
we focus on the most widely used mechanism for laser ion - acceleration of tnsa . starting from perfectly flat foils we show by simulations how electron filamentation at or inside the solid leads to spatial modulations in the ions .
the exact dynamics depend very sensitively on the chosen initial parameters which has a tremendous effect on electron dynamics . in the case of step - like density gradients
we find evidence that suggests a two - surface - plasmon decay of plasma oscillations triggering a raileigh - taylor - like instability . in laser ion acceleration ,
an ultra intense laser interacts with a solid and quickly ionizes its surface .
the laser light creates an immense pressure on the surface , produces large and fast electron currents into the solid and excites plasma waves . in such a scenario many instabilities develop which can disrupt the surface and break up the electron currents .
+ it has been shown previously that instabilities in _ ultrathin _ solid foils can imprint onto the spatial structure of ions in the regime of relativistically induced transparency target normal sheath acceleration ( rit tnsa @xcite ) or radiation pressure acceleration ( rpa @xcite ) @xcite mostly attributed to the rayleigh - taylor instability ( rti ) @xcite .
instabilities behind the foils can also develop during the ps timescales of the plasma expansion of tnsa @xcite .
here we show that instabilities developing in solid foils can also be of significance for the laser absorption and ion acceleration for thicker foils where no rit occurs .
we present results from particle - in - cell ( pic ) simulations using the code ipicls2d @xcite and refer the reader to our ref .
@xcite for experimental evidence .
we use dimensionless units with @xmath0 and measure distances in @xmath1-direction ( the laser direction ) relative to the initial foil front surface position and times relative to the time when the laser intensity maximum reaches @xmath2 . in most of our analysis
we will focus on two simulations , comparing the cases of a flat foil with exponential preformed plasma on the surface ( simulation a ) and without ( simulation b ) , the full simulation parameters are given in the caption of fig .
[ fig:1 ] .
+ one main finding is that instabilities which are prone to evolve in all of our simulations imprint on the ion density distribution behind the foil slab even for the micron thick foils used .
the instabilities we discuss in this paper are developing in the electrons first since the heavier ions remain almost at rest during the relevant time scales of electron motion .
of course this is not strictly correct since otherwise no rti instability could develop .
fig .
[ fig:1](a ) shows exemplary part of the electron density distribution of simulation a @xmath3 after the laser maximum has reached the foil front surface , and fig .
[ fig:1](b ) shows the corresponding ion density distribution . in this simulation
the electrons pushed into the foil at @xmath4 by the laser lorentz force are prone to a transverse weibel - like instability @xcite .
the @xmath4 electron slabs become filamented transversely and create energetic channels almost normal to the foil surface which are surrounded by strong quasi - static magnetic fields .
this happens during the first few plasma wavelengths @xmath5 as can be seen in fig .
[ fig:3]a .
the ion acceleration at the foil rear surface then follows this structure(cp .
fig , [ fig:1]a , b ) .
it is this that is different to the mechanism described in @xcite : the rear surface ion s acceleration itself is structured transversely _ from the beginning _ since the driving energetic electrons reach the rear surface filamented already in contrast to the relatively slow weibel instability witnessed in @xcite _ during _ the ion acceleration .
of course both can happen concurrently .
we now study the case of step - like density gradient at the front surface ( simulation b ) . in comparison to simulation a , where the bulk electrons remained distributed almost homogeneously transversely at the surface and only energetic electrons became filamented inside the foil , here the foil surface already shows transverse structure both in electron density ( fig .
[ fig:3]b , c ) and energy density ( fig .
[ fig:3]a ) , with the latter not increasing during passage through the foil contrarily to simulation a. the reason for this lies in the density ripples which give rise to filamented injection of electrons , similar to the mechanism described in @xcite .
we therefore conclude that in simulation b another filamentation mechanism must be present .
density ripples usually are created by rti and the density distribution in fig .
[ fig:3]c shows a pattern consistent with the linear stage of rti . yet
, typically the average distance @xmath6 between density maxima ( wave number @xmath7 ) should be given by the smallest transverse scale that could seed the instability , since the growth rate @xmath8 ( @xmath9 is the acceleration of the surface ) is largest for the largest @xmath10 .
hence we are looking for a mechanism that can seed a transverse density fluctuation which is then prone to a rti growth @xcite .
such a mechanism was described e.g. in @xcite where a generation of 2d electron surface oscillations ( 2desos ) by a parametric decay of @xmath4 oscillations of the foil surface in the laser field was found . there from initially purely longitudinal driving oscillations of the surface ( for the @xmath4 oscillations the driver frequency is @xmath11 ) , oscillations in a standing wave along the surface are generated via excitation of upward and downward moving and interfering surface waves with @xmath12 and @xmath13 given by [ eqn .
( 6 ) in @xcite ] . for our simulation conditions
this would correspond to @xmath14 , much smaller than the value extracted from the pic simulation @xmath15 .
this decay of @xmath4 oscillations with the characteristic @xmath16 longitudinal oscillation is observed in our simulation only at later times growing only slowly , which we attribute to larger @xmath10 .
however , considering not the @xmath4 oscillation as a driving source but the plasma oscillations excited by the disturbances we find good numerical agreement .
fig .
[ fig:4 ] shows a comparison of @xmath17 for a number of simulations we performed with different parameters ( varying @xmath18 and @xmath19 ) with the analytical value @xmath10 .
the agreement is generally rather good .
also , we find oscillations at @xmath20 in the spectrum of surface oscillations , fig .
[ fig:4](b ) .
here we defined a density level and recorded the position in x - direction ( laser direction ) where the rising density reaches that value .
we then computed the temporal fourier transform of this position averaged over the positions along the y - direction at the density ripple maxima , neglecting the regions in between .
the result would be a strong signal around the laser harmonics ( overlying all other signals ) which however are expected to be transversely flat here .
therefore we took the oscillation at the `` inner surface '' . by this
we mean the oscillation of the falling density slope behind the region of laser pressure steepened electron density , which can screen the lower laser harmonics .
as expected we find a signal at the plasma frequency @xmath21 computed using the maximum density and temperature at the peak of the laser pressure steepened density profile averaged over the distance of a plasma period .
additionally we also found another pronounced peak at @xmath20 .
since there is still a significant contribution from laser harmonics , we performed another simulation with @xmath22 and @xmath23 ( fig .
[ fig:4](c ) ) . due to the higher density
the skin depth @xmath24 is much shorter , screening laser harmonics , and additionally the plasma frequency and its half value are shifted to higher frequencies and hence are at higher and hence weaker harmonics . here
we again obtain a very clear signal at @xmath25 and @xmath20 . + it is interesting to mention that the development of surface ripples seen in simulation b can be artificially seeded . introducing an initial surface roughness containing a mixture of several spatial frequencies around @xmath26 we first find that the smallest spatial frequencies have the fastest growth , as expected for rti , and that this growth is most dominant when the spatial frequencies are initialized around @xmath10 ( fig .
[ fig:5 ] ) . for yet higher spatial frequencies
the effect of seeding abruptly ceases . + .
color scale is the same as in fig .
[ fig:1 ] .
largest surface ripple growth occurs when the spatial frequency @xmath10 is seeded , with a characteristic mushroom shape ( non - linear rti ) growing at the front ( central panel ) . here ,
@xmath27 , @xmath28.,width=302 ] summarizing , we found by simulations that the laser ion acceleration process in the tnsa regime can be influenced by electron instabilities at the surface or inside the foil .
the exact mechanism and scale of spatial modulations in the beam of hot electrons and ions sensitively depends on the initial parameters . for
the pursuit of higher ion energies at higher laser intensities , e.g. available at ( future ) petawatt laser systems , a deeper understanding and further characterization of laser and target parameter dependent plasma instabilities will be essential .
the work has been partially supported by ec fp7 laserlab - europe / charpac ( contract 284464 ) and by the german federal ministry of education and research ( bmbf ) under contract number 03z1o511 . | 10 url # 1#1urlprefix[2][]#2 gaillard s a , kluge t , flippo k a _ et al .
_ 2011 _ phys .
plasmas _ * 18 * 056710 dhumieres e , lefebvre e , gremillet l _
_ 2005 _ phys . plasmas _
bf 12 062704 ; maksimchuk a , gu s , flippo k _ et al . _ 2000 _ phys .
lett . _ * 84 * 4108 ; wilks s c , langdon a b , cowan t e _ et al .
_ 2001 _ phys . plasmas _ * 8 * 542 | url gaillard s kluge flippo k 2011 phys . plasmas 18 056710 dhumieres lefebvre gremillet l 2005 phys . plasmas 12 062704 maksimchuk gu s flippo k 2000 phys . 84 * 4108 wilks s langdon cowan t e 2001 . plasmas 8 * 542 | 0.068113 | 160 | 86 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,447 | in this work we relate the density of the first - passage time of a wiener process to a moving boundary with the three dimensional bessel bridge process and a solution of the heat equation with a moving boundary .
we provide bounds . | the main motivation of this work is to find the density of the first time @xmath0 , that a one - dimensional , standard brownian motion @xmath1 , reaches the moving boundary @xmath2 : @xmath3 where @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 for all @xmath7 . alternatively , assuming the previous assumptions : given that @xmath8 is the density of the first time that @xmath1 reaches the fixed level @xmath9 , the process @xmath10 is a 3-dimensional bessel bridge , which has the following dynamics : @xmath11 ( where @xmath12 is a wiener process . )
then , the distribution of @xmath0 equals @xmath13\\ \label{cota}&&\quad\times \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f'(u))^2du - f'(0)a\right\}h(s , a)ds\end{aligned}\ ] ] from girsanov s theorem , the fact that the boundary @xmath2 is twice continuously differentiable , the following radon - nikodym derivative : @xmath14 is indeed a _ martingale _ [ novikov s condition ] and induces the following relationship : @xmath15\\ & = & \tilde{\mathbb{e}}\left[\frac{d\mathbb{p}}{d\tilde{\mathbb{p}}}(t)\mathbb{i}_{(t\leq t)}\right]\\ & = & \int_0^t\tilde{\mathbb{e}}\left[\frac{d\mathbb{p}}{d\tilde{\mathbb{p}}}(t)\big{|}t = s\right]h(s , a)ds,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the second equality follows from the optional sampling theorem , and the third from conditioning with respect to @xmath0 under @xmath16 , and @xmath17 is defined in ( [ level ] ) . in revuz and yor ( 1999 ) ( chapter 11 )
, it is shown that calculating : @xmath18\ ] ] is equivalent to finding the expected value of a functional of a 3-dimensional bessel bridge @xmath10 , which at time 0 starts at @xmath9 and at time @xmath19 equals 0 .
indeed , @xmath20\\ & & \nonumber\quad= \tilde{\mathbb{e}}\bigg{[}\exp\bigg{\{}-f'(t)a+\int_0^tf''(u)\tilde{b}_udu\\ & & \nonumber\quad\qquad -\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t(f'(u))^2du\bigg{\}}\big{|}t = s\bigg{]}\\ & & \nonumber\quad= \tilde{\mathbb{e}}\left[\exp\left\{-f'(s)a+\int_0^sf''(u)(a-\tilde{x}_u)du-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f'(u))^2du\right\}\right]\\ & & \nonumber\quad = \tilde{\mathbb{e}}\bigg{[}\exp\bigg{\{}-f'(s)a+(f'(s)-f'(0))a-\int_0^sf''(u)\tilde{x}_udu\\ & & \nonumber\quad\qquad-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f'(u))^2du\bigg{\ } } \bigg{]}\\ & & \label{problem}\quad = \tilde{\mathbb{e}}\left[\exp\left\{-\int_0^sf''(u)\tilde{x}_udu\right\}\right]\\ & & \nonumber\qquad\quad\times\exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f'(u))^2du - f'(0)a\right\}\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus the process @xmath21 equals 0 at @xmath22 , and at @xmath19 reaches level @xmath9 for the first time , as required [ see figures [ f1][f3 ] ] . from equation ( [ problem ] )
it is clear that our next goal is to compute the following expected value : @xmath23.\ ] ] suppose that @xmath24\times \mathbb{r}^+\to\mathbb{r}^+$ ] is continuous , is of class @xmath25 and satisfies the cauchy problem @xmath26 as well as @xmath27 then @xmath28 admits the stochastic representation @xmath29\end{aligned}\ ] ] we proceed as in the proof of theorem 5.7.6 , pp .
366367 , karatzas & shreve ( 1991 ) .
applying ito s rule to the process @xmath30
@xmath31 $ ] , and obtain , with @xmath32 , @xmath33\\ & & + \tilde{\mathbb{e}}^{t , a}\left[v(\tau_n , x_{\tau_n})\exp\left\{-\int_t^{\tau_n}f''(u)\tilde{x}_udu\right\}\mathbb{i}_{(\tau_n\leq s)}\right]\end{aligned}\ ] ] the second term converges to zero as @xmath34 , since @xmath35\\&&\qquad\qquad\leq \tilde{\mathbb{e}}^{t , x}\left[v(\tau_n,\tilde{x}_{\tau_n})\mathbb{i}_{(\tau_n\leq s)}\right]\\ & & \qquad\qquad\leq\tilde{\mathbb{p}}^{t , x}(\tau_n\leq s)\\ & & \qquad\qquad=\tilde{\mathbb{p}}^{t , x}\left(\max\limits_{t\leq\theta\leq s}\tilde{x}_\theta\geq n\right)\\ & & \qquad\qquad\leq \frac{\tilde{\mathbb{e}}^{t , x}\left[\max\limits_{t\leq\theta\leq s}\tilde{x}_\theta^{2m}\right]}{n^{2m}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ see pitman and yor ( 1998 ) for the moments of the running maximum of @xmath10 ] .
finally , the first term converges to @xmath37\end{aligned}\ ] ] either by the dominated or by the monotone convergence theorem . ,
width=240,height=201 ] , width=240,height=201 ] , width=240,height=201 ]
solutions to ( [ cau ] ) are of the following form @xmath38 where @xmath39 and @xmath40 as in ( [ level ] ) . setting @xmath41 and @xmath42 , we have that @xmath43u(t , a)\\ u_a(t , a)&=&-\left[\frac{1}{a}-\frac{a}{s - t}\right]u(t , a)\\ u_{aa}(t , a)&=&\left[\frac{2}{a^2}+\frac{a^2}{(s - t)^2}-\frac{1}{s - t}\right]u(t , a)\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath44 hence from ( [ cau ] ) and ( [ schro ] ) it follows that @xmath45w=\left[u_a+\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{a}{s - t}\right)u\right]w_a,\end{aligned}\ ] ] as claimed .
let @xmath48 applying the fourier transform to ( [ schro ] ) we have @xmath49 next , set @xmath50 and @xmath51 , that is : @xmath52 which after substitution in ( [ fou ] ) leads to @xmath53 consequently @xmath54 which alternatively implies that @xmath55 as claimed .
xx karatzas , i. and s. shreve .
brownian motion and stochastic calculus , springer - verlag , new york .
pitman , j. , and m. yor ( 1998 ) .
the law of the maximum of a bessel bridge .
technical report no .
revuz , d. , and m. yor .
continuous martingales and brownian motion , springer - verlag , new york . | motivation find density first time @xmath0 one - dimensional brownian motion @xmath1 reaches boundary @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath7 assuming assumptions @xmath8 density first time @xmath1 reaches fixed level @xmath9 process @xmath10 3-dimensional bessel bridge dynamics @xmath11 @xmath12 wiener processdistribution @xmath0 equals @xmath13\\\quad\times\left\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f')^2du - f'(0)a\right}h(s a)ds\end{aligned} girsanov s theorem boundary @xmath2 twice continuously differentiable radon - nikodym derivative @xmath14 martingale novikov s condition induces relationship @xmath15\\\tilde{\mathbb{e}}\left{d\mathbb{p}})\mathbb{i}\right\tilde\left{}t = s\right]h(s a)ds{aligned} second equality optional sampling theorem third conditioning @xmath0 under @xmath16 @xmath17 defined level ] revuz and yor 1999 chapter 11 calculating @xmath18 equivalent finding expected value 3-dimensional bessel bridge @xmath10 0 starts @xmath9 @xmath19 equals 0 \nonumber\quad \tilde\bigg-f'(t)a+_0^tf''(u)\tilde\nonumber\quad\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t(f'(u))^2du \tilde\left-f'(s)a+\int_0^sf''-\tilde\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f'(u))^2du\nonumber \tilde-f'(s)a+(f-f'(0))a-\int_0^sf''(u)\tilde{x\nonumber\quad-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f'(u))^2du\bigg\quad =\tilde{\left-\int_0^sf''(u)\tilde{x}_udu\nonumber\qquad\left\frac{1}{2}\int_0^s(f'(u))^2du f'(0)a process @xmath21 equals 0 @xmath22 @xmath19 reaches @xmath9first time required see figures f1][f3 equation problem next goal compute expected value @xmath23. @xmath24^+^+$ continuous class @xmath25 satisfies cauchy problem @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 admits stochastic representation @xmath29\end{aligned} proceed proof theorem 5.7.6 pp . 366367 karatzas shreve 1991 )rule process @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33\\ \tilde{\mathbb{e}}^{t\left\tau_n\tau\tau_n\tilde{x}\mathbb{i}(\tau_n\leq s{aligned second term converges zero @xmath34 @xmath35\\\leq \tilde{\mathbb{e}}^{t x\left\tau_n\tau_n}\mathbb{i\tau_n\leq\leq\tilde{\mathbb{p}}^{t x}(\tau_n\leq\tilde{\mathbb{p}}^{t x\left\limits_{t\leq\theta\leq\tilde{x}_\theta\geq\leq\tilde{\mathbb{e}}^{t x}\left\limits_{t\leq\theta\leq\tilde{x}_\theta{2m}{aligned see pitman yor 1998 ) running maximum @xmath10 first term converges @xmath37{aligned dominated monotone convergence theoremwidth=240,height=201 solutions cau ] @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 level setting @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43u(t u_a(t\left[\frac{1}{a}-{a}{s - t}\right]u\frac{2}{a^2}+{a^2}{ - t^2}-{1}{s - t}\right]u{aligned} @xmath44 @xmath45w=\left[u_a+\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{a}{s - t}\right)u\right]w_a\end{aligned} @xmath48 fourier transform schro @xmath49 set @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 substitution leads to @xmath53 @xmath54 implies @xmath55 karatzas . s. shreve brownian motion stochastic calculus springer - verlag new york pitman j. m. yor 1998 law of maximum bessel bridge technical report revuz d m. yor continuous martingales brownian motion springer - verlag new york | 0.334295 | 1,904 | 1,060 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,453 | the notion of compressed quantum computation is employed to simulate the ising interaction of a 1d chain consisting out of @xmath0 qubits using the universal ibm cloud quantum computer running on @xmath1 qubits .
the external field parameter that controls the quantum phase transition of this model translates into particular settings of the quantum gates that generate the circuit .
we measure the magnetization , which displays the quantum phase transition , on a two qubit system , which simulates a four qubit ising chain , and show its agreement with the theoretical prediction within a certain error .
we also discuss the relevant point of how to assess errors when using a cloud quantum computer . as a solution
, we propose to use validating circuits , that is to run independent controlled quantum circuits of similar complexity to the circuit of interest .
the faithful simulation of quantum systems remains one of the most interesting problems that can be addressed with a full - fledged quantum computer .
phenomena such as superconductivity in two dimensions , highly frustrated condensed matter systems or the effect of topology in quantum systems are out of the reach of classical simulation .
the emergence of new designs for quantum computation further motivates more detailed studies of mapping quantum problems to realistic quantum computation .
a particular instance of relevant physics that can be addressed with a quantum computation is the study of quantum phase transitions @xcite .
indeed , some systems undergo a quantum phase transition which is characterized by large quantum correlations at zero temperature . at their critical point , conformal symmetry is restored and correlations decay algebraically and become long - ranged .
furthermore , the entanglement entropy of the ground state of the system diverges in the thermodynamic limit at the phase transition . in general
, such a large amount of entanglement can not be described correctly in two dimensions by classical means . several experimental set
ups are currently employed to investigate quantum phase transitions @xcite .
this poses the problem of designing refined experiments , which have so far tended to exploit the avenue of quantum simulation , rather than quantum computation .
one of the reasons for that is that universal quantum computation , which can be used to simulate any system , is currently restricted to approximately ten qubits @xcite .
however , as we will also exploit here , certain simulations can be compressed and run on an exponentially smaller universal quantum computer .
a particularly interesting new approach to the use of quantum computers is the advent of cloud quantum computation .
the free access to run quantum circuits on a remote cloud computer opens the door to design new algorithms , to improve them by trial and error , and to refute or consolidate non - obvious ideas .
it may be argued that cloud quantum computation plays a similar role to the introduction of personal computers or open mainframes in the early stages of informatics . at present ,
the availability of cloud quantum computation is limited to the ibm quantum experience project @xcite .
it is a universal five - qubit quantum computer based on superconducting transmon qubits .
the ibm quantum computer has already been tested in various ways , e.g. , how well it performs in violating mermin inequalities @xcite . moreover ,
error correction codes , fourier addition , preparing graph states , and fault tolerant circuit design have been considered @xcite . in the present paper
we test the performance of the ibm quantum computer with a compressed simulation of the transverse field 1d ising interaction .
the quantum ising model is an integrable model and an exact circuit can construct its ground state @xcite .
moreover , the notion of compressed quantum computation @xcite can be employed to simulate the ising chain of @xmath0 qubits by using only @xmath1 qubits @xcite .
it has also been applied to the xy - model and compressed quantum metrology @xcite . moreover ,
the compressed simulation of the ising spin chain ( consisting of @xmath2 qubits ) has been realized in an experiment using nmr quantum computing @xcite . on the available cloud quantum computer ,
it is now possible to simulate a four qubit ising chain utilizing only two qubits . in order to realize this computation
, we decompose the circuits for the compressed simulation into the available gate set .
we run these circuits on the quantum computer and measure the order parameter that displays the quantum phase transition . given that the size of the system is finite
, we do observe smoothed changes of the order parameter that agree with the theoretical predictions within errors .
an important aspect to be addressed here is the assessment of errors .
there are two sources of errors that have to be considered separately .
first , it is necessary to run an experiment often enough so that statistical errors are reduced .
this is an easy task since it only implies repetition of experiments .
second , systematic errors must be estimated .
the situation here is particularly subtle , as a cloud computer is run by teams unrelated to its users .
the problem of how to estimate a systematic error without knowing the detail of the computer is non - trivial .
nevertheless , an approach to the correct assessment of systematic errors can be done , using independent controlled circuits of similar complexity to the one of interest .
this idea of estimating systematic errors produced by a black box might be of relevance for all future cloud quantum computation .
the outline of the remainder of the paper is the following .
we first discuss some of the features and constraints of the ibm quantum computer .
then , we analyze errors occurring when single gates are applied as well as errors in more complex circuits . there , we introduce the concept of a validating circuit set in order to estimate the error of a quantum computation in case the user does not have direct access to the computer . after reviewing then the notion of compressed quantum simulation and the explicit circuits for the compressed simulation of the ising interaction , we derive a two - qubit circuit suitable for the ibm quantum computer , which simulates a four - qubit spin chain .
we present and discuss the results of the simulation and show that they agree with the theoretical prediction within the error estimated before . in the appendix
, we outline how circuits simulating the eight and more - qubit spin chain can be constructed and argue that performing the computation will become possible once the announced improvements to the ibm quantum computer are implemented .
let us begin by discussing some of the features and constraints of the ibm quantum computer , which consists currently of five qubits @xcite .
the qubits are initiated in the computational basis state @xmath3 . as mentioned before ,
a limited but universal set of gates is available , namely the well known clifford+t set .
this set consists of the pauli operators ( @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 ) , the hadamard gate ( @xmath7 ) , phase gates ( @xmath8 , @xmath9 ) , @xmath10 gates ( @xmath11 , @xmath12 ) , as well as entangling controlled not gates ( @xmath13 ) .
measurements in @xmath6-basis as well as bloch vector measurements ( see below ) are performable .
currently , only limited classical control is available , e.g. , implementing gates probabilistically is not supported .
moreover , the depth of the circuit , i.e. , the number of gates that have to be applied successively and can not be parallelized , is limited to 39 . due to the architecture of the quantum computer , one qubit , which we denote as qubit 2 in the following , plays a special role .
it is the only qubit that can be target of a @xmath13 gate .
note that the gate set is nevertheless universal .
however , applying e.g. a @xmath13 gate between qubits @xmath14 and @xmath15 ( both different than @xmath16 here ) , which we denote by @xmath17 in the following , is very uneconomical .
one first needs to swap qubit @xmath15 and qubit @xmath16 ( which requires three @xmath13s ) , apply @xmath18 and swap again qubits @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
as computations are naturally subject to both systematic and statistical errors , ibm provides access to a classical simulator that implements an error model of the quantum computing hardware and therefore allows simulation of a circuit before actually performing the computation .
let us now investigate the errors , which occur in the computation .
we will first analyze the errors that occur after applying a single gate and then consider those , which occur in an actual quantum computation , involving many gates .
note that the maximum allowed number of runs of one computation is limited to 8192 , which allows to estimate the statistical error . in order to get an estimation of the error that occurs after applying a single gate from the gate set , we perform the following procedure .
we apply the single gate @xmath19 to the initial state @xmath20 .
ideally this would yield the state @xmath21 .
however , due to systematic errors , in the preparation as well as in the application of the gate , a state @xmath22 is obtained .
we perform tomography , which is of course also subject to both systematic and statistical errors , on the state @xmath22 .
that is , we perform three experiments measuring @xmath23 , @xmath24 , and @xmath25 with 8192 runs each . in order to measure @xmath4 and
@xmath5 the gates @xmath7 and @xmath26 are applied respectively prior the @xmath6 measurement .
an estimate , @xmath27 , of the state @xmath22 is then determined using the direct inversion method , i.e. , @xmath28 , where @xmath29 .
the fidelity , @xmath30 , of the estimate @xmath27 with respect to the ideal state @xmath21 is presented in table [ tab : fidelities ] for different choices of @xmath19 .
.fidelities of the estimate of the real state , @xmath27 , with respect to the ideal state @xmath21 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] | in this section we explicitly give the circuits simulating the magnetization of a @xmath31-qubit spin chain using @xmath16 qubits .
we measure the magnetization of the spin chain at 12 equidistantly distributed values of @xmath32 . in particular , we choose @xmath33 , as in @xcite .
we also choose the parameters of the adiabatic evolution , @xmath34 and @xmath35 .
see main text for an explanation of these parameters . as explained in the main text ,
we compute the unitary @xmath36 performing the whole adiabatic evolution and decompose this unitary into the available gates set , as a step - wise implementation of the adiabatic evolution is not possible at the moment due to the current limit in circuit depth .
we entangle qubit 2 with an auxiliary qubit , qubit 3 , which is discarded afterwards in order to prepare @xmath37 on qubit 2 . in each circuit
we measure qubit 1 in order to obtain the magnetization @xmath38 .
the explicit circuits for each value @xmath32 are given in figure [ fig : cheatingcircuits ] .
in the following , we argue that with the current version of the ibm quantum computer it seems unfeasible to run the compressed simulation of the ising spin chain using three or more qubits and hence , simulating a eight or more - qubit spin chain .
nevertheless , we show that the computation will become possible once several improvements that ibm announced are implemented . at the moment , performing the computation using three or more qubits seems not possible due to the restriction in circuit depth , the limited gate set , and the fact that gates can not be implemented probabilistically .
we exemplarily show , that even preparing the initial state @xmath39 is a difficult task . to obtain the initial state , two of the qubits have to be prepared in a completely mixed state , while one qubit is prepared in @xmath40 .
see figure [ fig : preparation3 ] for a possible , but very uneconomical way to do so using a circuit of circuit depth six and consuming two auxiliary qubits that are discarded in the process .
note that there seems to be no less wasteful way to prepare @xmath39 as applying gates probabilistically is not possible at the moment . nevertheless , once the improvements that ibm announced are available , implementing the circuit for more qubits will become possible . here
, we exemplarily show how to implement the circuit for three qubits , the method can be generalized to more qubits , though . to this end , we assume that the following improvements are available .
we assume that advanced classical processing is available .
in particular , we assume that it is possible to apply gates probabilistically .
furthermore , we assume that arbitrary single qubit gates are available and that subroutines are available , i.e. , user - defined gates can be declared and used . in this case
the circuit can be implemented as follows .
the initial state @xmath41 is prepared by performing either a pauli @xmath4 or @xmath37 with probability @xmath42 on both of the qubits for which we want to prepare @xmath43 individually ( which we will denote as qubits 1 and 2 in the following ) , and furthermore performing a single qubit unitary that rotates @xmath3 to @xmath40 for the remaining qubit , which we will denote as qubit 3 in the following .
after the initial state is prepared , the system is evolved adiabatically . in each step of this adiabatic evolution the unitary @xmath44 has to be applied .
the unitaries @xmath45 , @xmath46 , and @xmath47 are given in the main text .
the unitary @xmath48 is a single qubit unitary and hence can be implemented easily .
we have @xmath49 , where @xmath50 denotes a gate @xmath51 controlled by qubits @xmath52 .
a possible implementation of this controlled phase gate is depicted in figure [ fig : ccphase ] @xcite . recall that the two swaps can be implemented using three @xmath13 gates , while phase gates that are controlled by one qubit may be decomposed into two controlled not gates and three single qubit unitaries @xcite .
implementing @xmath46 is more tricky .
first , one performs a basis transformation by applying @xmath53 , where @xmath54 . in the new basis the unitary @xmath46
is given by the unitary @xmath55 , where @xmath56 followed by a single qubit unitary @xmath57 @xcite .
finally , the basis change has to be undone , i.e. , @xmath19 is applied .
the controlled rotation can be implemented in a similar way as shown above for @xmath45 . in order to implement @xmath19
, we use that this unitary can be decomposed into a toffoli gate @xmath58 followed by a @xmath59 , and a pauli @xmath60 @xcite .
this circuit can be further decomposed using the decomposition of the toffoli gate suitable for the ibm quantum computer @xcite and some simplifications , yielding the circuit depicted in figure [ fig : agate ] .
this circuit can be packed into a user - defined three - qubit gate depending on the free parameter @xmath61 and the adiabatic evolution is performed by applying these gates with increasing @xmath62 successively . finally , measuring @xmath6 on qubit 3 yields the magnetization of the eight - qubit spin chain . as ibm announced , that advanced classical processing , arbitrary single qubit unitaries , and user - defined gates will become available in future , implementing the circuit for three or more qubits will become feasible
, as long as the number of steps ( recall that we used l=2400 steps before ) is not an issue .
otherwise , similar methods as those used in the two qubit circuit will have to be applied . | section give circuits simulating magnetization @xmath31-qubit spin chain using @xmath16 qubits measure magnetization at 12 values of @xmath32 choose @xmath33 choose parameters adiabatic evolution @xmath34 @xmath35 see main text for explanation parameters compute unitary @xmath36 adiabatic evolution decompose into gates set step - implementation not possible due limit circuit depth entangle qubit 2 with auxiliary qubit 3 discarded prepare @xmath37 on qubit 2 measure qubit 1 obtain magnetization @xmath38 circuits for each value @xmath32 given in figure [ cheatingcircuits argue current version ibm quantum computer unfeasible to run compressed simulation spin chain using three or more qubits eight or more - qubit spin chain computation possible once improvements ibm implemented computation using three or more qubits not possible due to restriction circuit depth limited gate set gates not implemented probabilistically preparing initial state @xmath39 difficult task two qubits prepared in mixed state one qubit prepared in @xmath40 figure preparation3 ] for uneconomical way using circuit depth six consuming two auxiliary qubits discarded no less wasteful way prepare @xmath39 applying gates probabilistically not possible once improvements ibm announced available implementing circuit for more qubits possible show implement circuit for three qubits method generalized to more qubits assume improvements available advanced classical processing possible to apply gates probabilistically arbitrary single qubit gates available subroutines available user - defined gates used circuit implemented initial state @xmath41 prepared performing pauli @xmath4 or @xmath37 with probability @xmath42 on qubits @xmath43 individually qubits 1 and 2 performing single qubit unitary rotates @xmath3 to @xmath40 for remaining qubit qubit 3 after initial state prepared system evolved adiabatically each step unitary @xmath44 applied unitaries @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 given in main text unitary @xmath48 single qubit unitary implemented easily @xmath49 @xmath50 denotes gate @xmath51 controlled by qubits @xmath52 .implementation controlled phase gate depicted in figure ccphase ] @xcite two swaps implemented using three @xmath13 gates phase gates controlled by one qubit decomposed into two gates three single qubit unitaries implementing @xmath46 tricky basis transformation applying @xmath53 @xmath54 unitary @xmath46 given by @xmath55 @xmath56 followed by single qubit unitary @xmath57 basis change undone @xmath19 applied controlled rotation implemented similar @xmath45 @xmath19 unitary decomposed into toffoli gate @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xcite circuit decomposed using toffoli gate for ibm quantum computer @xcite simplifications circuit in figure circuit packed into user - defined three - qubit gate @xmath61 adiabatic evolution applying gates increasing @xmath62 measuring @xmath6 on qubit 3 yields magnetization of eight - qubit spin chain ibm advanced classical processing single qubit unitaries user - defined gates available future implementing circuit for three or more qubits feasible number steps not issue similar methods two qubit circuit | 0.362206 | 1,299 | 685 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,455 | planar reconstruction patterns at the zigzag and armchair edges of graphene were investigated with density functional theory .
it was unexpectedly found that the zigzag edge is metastable and a planar reconstruction spontaneously takes place at room temperature
. the reconstruction changes electronic structure and self - passivates the edge with respect to adsorption of atomic hydrogen from molecular atmosphere .
carbon is one of the most prominent elements in nature , vital for biology and life .
although macroscopic carbon has been important since ancient times@xcite , only modern materials design , utilizing nanotubes@xcite , fullerenes@xcite and single graphene sheets@xcite , fully attempts to use its flexible chemistry . in applications for nanoscale materials and devices , it is often the atomic and electronic structure of boundaries and surfaces that is responsible for mechanical , electronic and chemical properties . since the properties of nanomaterial depend on the precise atomic geometry , its knowledge is crucial for focused preparation of experiments and for worthy theoretical modeling . only this enables the further development of nanoelectronic components , nanoelectromechanical devices and hydrogen storage materials@xcite , or the usage of carbon in compound designs@xcite .
the importance of precise geometry is emphasized in low - dimensional systems .
the strong correlations are known to bring up novel phenomena@xcite , and such should be expected also for the quasi - one - dimensional edges of graphene .
the edge chemistry plays even crucial role in the catalyzed growth of carbon nanotubes@xcite .
specifically , as two - dimensional carbon has the honeycomb lattice , edge behaviour ultimately boils down to the properties of graphene edges .
hence it is relevant to explore different graphene edge geometries and their chemical properties beyond the standard zigzag and armchair ones .
this relevance is evident from the abundant literature .
the electronic properties of graphene as well as carbon nanotube armchair and zigzag edges have been studied extensively@xcite , often in connection to nanotube growth@xcite or the so - called electronic `` edge states''@xcite .
there has been experimental and theoretical work done even on the reconstruction of graphene edges , but they have differed from the basic reconstruction patterns studied in this work . they have involved either edge roughness@xcite or more dramatic folding of the edge into a loop@xcite . , @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath2 .
all geometries are strictly in plane.,width=321 ] the edges discussed in this work are shown in figure [ fig : edges ] , and were investigated by modeling an infinitely long carbon nanoribbon of a given width ( see methods ) .
tight - binding method@xcite was used to explore number of other edge candidates , but density - functional analysis only for the relevant ones is reported here .
the most important edge is zz(57 ) , a reconstruction of zigzag edge where two hexagons transform into a pentagon and a heptagon , like an edge cut through a haeckelite structure or a line of stone - wales defects@xcite .
the edge ac(677 ) is a reconstruction of the armchair edge where two separate `` armrest '' hexagons merge into adjacent heptagons by stone - wales mechanism .
the pentagonal reconstruction ac(56 ) of armchair has a slightly different nature , since it requires the diffusion of carbon atoms from distant `` armrests '' to `` seat '' positions .
let us start analysis by looking at edge energy @xmath3 , which is calculated from the total energy of the graphene ribbon @xmath4 where @xmath5 is the number of carbon atoms , @xmath6 the total length of edges ( twice the length of simulation cell ) , and @xmath7 ev is the cohesion energy of graphene .
the edge energies converge rapidly as shown in figure [ fig : width ] and justify the reference to ( semi - infinite ) graphene .
the energy of armchair edge is @xmath8 ev / lower than for zigzag edge , in accord with a similar value for nanotubes@xcite .
however , the principal result is that by edge reconstruction zigzag may lower its energy by @xmath9 ev / .
this implies that the _ reconstructed zigzag is the best edge for graphene_. to the best of our knowledge , this is the first report on the metastability of the zigzag edge , which is surprising in view of the abundant literature
. thermal stability of this novel reconstruction was also confirmed with tight - binding simulations@xcite .
the ac(677 ) edge has only slightly higher energy than the armchair edge , whereas ac(56 ) reconstruction has the highest edge energy .
we remark that the reconstructions appear to be stable with respect to out - of - plane motion , a situation somewhat different from small - diameter nanotubes@xcite .
.,width=302 ] these energetics can be understood by looking at the geometries of figure [ fig : edges ] .
previous studies have shown that armchair has low energy due to triple bonds in the `` armrests''@xcite , as realized by comparing their short bonds ( @xmath10 ) to the bond in acetylene ( @xmath11 ) .
zigzag does not have such triple bonds and ends up with strong and expensive dangling bonds .
the reconstructed zz(57 ) has triple bonds ( @xmath10 ) but also wider bond angles ( @xmath12 ) which reduces the hybridization energy cost .
triple bonds with wide angles can be observed also in ac(677 ) edge , but strain in other parts makes the reconstruction unfavoured .
the ac(56 ) edge suffers from dangling bonds like zigzag , and additional high strain energy makes this reconstruction the most expensive one .
regardless , ac(56 ) edge has relevance during the growth of armchair edges@xcite . with coverage of one hydrogen per edge atom and lower
faint symbols are shifted by subtracting the h@xmath13 binding energy ; positive @xmath14 means the hydrogen atom is more strongly bound to the edge than to h@xmath13 molecule.,width=302 ] these observations are supported by hydrogen atom adsorption energies , shown in figure [ fig : ads ] .
the weak adsorption for armchair ( @xmath15 ev ) compared to zigzag ( @xmath16 ev ) stems from the triple bonds in the armchair edge . similarly the weak adsorption for zz(57 ) ( @xmath17 ev ) and ac(677 ) ( @xmath18 ev ) witnesses the weakening of dangling bonds .
the adsorption for ac(56 ) is large because of the strongest dangling bonds . for insight
, the adsorption energies in figure [ fig : ads ] are replotted by subtracting hydrogen molecule binding energy @xmath19 ev . the resulting negative number for zz(57 ) means that the adsorption of hydrogen atom from h@xmath13 molecule is not favored due to cost of h@xmath13 dissociation energy , unless the adsorption process should be complicated@xcite .
this amounts to the conclusion that _ the edge reconstruction chemically passivates zigzag edge_. however , hydrogen adsorption for zigzag@xmath20hydrogen edge has yet smaller adsorption energy of @xmath21 ev .
the edge energetics are summarized in table [ tab : ads ] .
note that the ordering of edges changes when expressed as energy per edge atom ( @xmath22 ) due to different edge atom densities @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
more interesting is to look at edges with hydrogen termination ( klein edge)@xcite . for this case
the edge energy is @xmath25 , where the reference is to bulk graphene and h@xmath13 molecules .
the best edges in this case are normal armchair and zigzag edges because of dangling bonds . on the contrary ,
the weak dangling bonds and small adsorption energy causes high energies for zz(57 ) and ac(677 ) klein edges .
.summary of the edge and hydrogen adsorption energies .
@xmath26 is the energy per edge atom , @xmath27 the hydrogen adsorption energy with full edge coverage , and @xmath28 is the edge energy with hydrogen termination .
note that for ac(56 ) the edge atom density is @xmath29 .
[ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] wide zigzag and zz(57 ) nanoribbons , respectively , with unit cell width of @xmath30 .
note that for zigzag this is twice the minimum unit cell and the reciprocal space is thus only half of the normal representation . the dashed line is the fermi - level .
the bands coloured were identified directly by visual inspection of the wave functions .
( c ) and ( d ) show the height profiles of simulated scanning tunneling microscope images in constant current mode of the respective edges ( height variations @xmath31
) , formed by integrating the electron density from occupied bands within 0.1 ev of the fermi energy .
the degeneracies at the gamma - point are 2 and 4 for the dangling bonds and the flat band , respectively.,width=321 ] let us now concentrate on the thermodynamic and electronic properties of zigzag edges .
we would like to clarify an aspect which is ambiguous in the literature : there are two types of electronic zigzag edge states . the so - called `` flat band '' in figure [ fig : electr]a comes from the bulk @xmath32-electrons and is indeed localized at the edge .
but the band due to dangling bonds is the one seen in the scanning tunneling microscope ( stm ) image and is located spatially even beyond the edge ( figure [ fig : electr]c ) . in zz(57 ) formation of triple bonds is evidenced by the nearly isolated dimers in figure [ fig : electr]d , and the reconstruction removes the dangling bond bands away from the fermi - level by lifting the degeneracy almost by @xmath33 ev .
hence for zz(57 ) the stm image shows only the `` flat band '' states . because the dangling bond bands shift to elusive energies , also chemical reactivity reduces . in thermodynamic sense the spontaneous reconstruction of zigzag into zz(57 ) should be possible , since the activation barrier from the zigzag side is only @xmath34 ev , from the reconstructed side @xmath35 ev .
the g - mode vibration of graphene at @xmath36 @xmath37 gives an attempt frequency of @xmath38 s@xmath39 , and elementary approach yields the rapid rate @xmath40 s@xmath39 at room temperature .
the reconstructions predicted in this work are expected to survive on graphite terraces due to the weak interaction ( @xmath41 mev / atom ) between the basal planes@xcite . using appropriate sample preparation it should be thus possible to observe the reconstruction .
stm images often show irregular and blurred edges , yielding no atomic resolution , but at least for passivated edges armchair predominance is claimed , in agreement with table [ tab : ads]@xcite . so far samples have been prepared intentionally with hydrogen passivation during heat treatment@xcite , a situation where reconstruction would not be favored .
alternate routes for observing the reconstruction would be the radial distribution function from neutron diffraction experiments without deuterium atmosphere@xcite , or detection of triple bond -spawned high - energy modes around @xmath42 @xmath37 with raman spectroscopy .
a further topic is the study of the conductance of various graphene edges , particularly the zz(57 ) edge found here .
the presence of the edge state around the fermi level makes zz(57 ) ideal for conductance measurements , in contrast to armchair ribbons where the edge state is absent .
this may render zz(57 ) as an interesting stable model for quasi - one - dimensional carbyne with alternating single and triple bonds .
furthermore , the novel thermodynamically and chemically stable reconstruction could play a role in formation of angular joints in nanoribbons@xcite , closure of the ends of nanotubes after cutting@xcite and any other system where graphene sheets are joined to produce systems with nano - scale morphology . | we used density - functional theory in conjunction with generalized gradient approximation for the exchange correlation functional@xcite and projector augmented waves@xcite for the c(@xmath43 ) electrons , as implemented in gpaw code using real - space grids@xcite .
converged energies were obtained with grid spacing of @xmath44 and @xmath45 @xmath46-points in the periodic direction . in the perpendicular directions the system is not periodic and the space between the atoms and the wall of the simulation cell was @xmath47 .
the energies were converged to @xmath48 ev / atom and structures were optimized until forces were less than @xmath49 ev / . our calculations agree well with previous relevant experimental as well as theoretical energetic and geometric properties@xcite .
the activation barrier was calculated with nudged elastic band method@xcite by fixing the atoms beyond the first two zigzag - rows with unit cell of length @xmath30 .
the constant current stm of fig .
[ fig : electr ] shows the height profile of electron density isosurface of the occupied states within @xmath50 ev energy window below the fermi - level .
the isosurface value corresponds to average density 2 above the graphene plane ( @xmath51 electrons / @xmath52 ) .
we acknowledge support from the academy of finland ( projects 121701 and 117997 ) and from the finnish cultural foundation .
we thank matti manninen for discussions , michael walter for technical assistance with gpaw calculations and karoliina honkala for reading of the manuscript .
the computational resources were provided by the finnish it center for science ( csc ) in espoo . | used density - functional theory gradient approximation exchange correlation projector augmented waves c(@xmath43 electrons implemented gpaw code real - space grids converged energies obtained grid spacing @xmath44-points periodic perpendicular directions system not periodic space between atoms wall cell @xmath47 energies converged to @xmath48 ev / atom structures optimized until forces less than @xmath49 ev calculations agree with theoretical energetic geometric properties activation barrier calculated nudged elastic band method fixing atoms beyond zigzag - rows unit cell length constant current stm fig shows height electron density isosurface states @xmath50 ev energy window below fermi - level isosurface value corresponds average density 2 above graphene plane support academy of finland finnish cultural foundation matti manninen michael walter karoliina honkala computational resources provided finnish center for science | 0.076412 | 358 | 163 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,456 | we show that a strongly renormalized band of polaronic quasiparticle excitations is induced at the fermi level of an interacting many - electron system on increasing the coupling of the electrons to local phonons .
we give results for the local density of states at zero temperature both for the electrons and phonons .
the polaronic quasiparticles satisfy luttinger s theorem for all regimes considered , and their dispersion shows a kink similar to that observed experimentally in copper oxides .
we calculate the quasiparticle weight factor @xmath0 and deduce the local effective inter - quasiparticle interaction @xmath1 .
our calculations are based on the dynamical mean field theory and the numerical renormalization group for the hole - doped holstein - hubbard model and large on - site repulsion . | polarons as quasiparticles , in which the electronic excitations are strongly coupled to the lattice modes , have been studied theoretically for well over 50 years .
nearly all these studies have been confined to models with only one or two electrons , and do not include the electron spin .
such models have limited applicability and there is a need for studies of more realistic many - electron situations@xcite .
there are technical problems , however , in handling such models as non - perturbative methods are required to describe the effects of strong electron - lattice interactions and few such methods are applicable to the many - electron case .
progress has been made in recent years in dealing with models with strong local interactions via the dynamical mean field theory ( dmft)@xcite .
calculations based on the holstein and holstein - hubbard models , where the electrons are coupled to local einstein lattice modes , have been made using the dmft to examine the effect of strong electron - phonon interactions on the mott transition@xcite , for example .
the holstein model@xcite , however , was originally introduced to describe small polaron effects .
within dmft , only the single electron case can be solved exactly@xcite .
there have been few studies at finite electron densities and including the electron spin@xcite , except in one dimension@xcite .
the problem is that if spin is included in the holstein model , there is an effective attractive local interaction between the electrons , which leads to local bipolaron formation and , away from half filling , superconductivity .
once the electron spin is included the more realistic model is the holstein - hubbard model which includes an local electron repulsion @xmath2 . in most situations the repulsion @xmath2 dominates and undermines any tendency to the formation of local bipolarons . in the holstein - hubbard model at half filling with a large @xmath2 , the electron - phonon interaction plays no important role as charge fluctuations are suppressed ; its main effect is to renormalise and reduce the effective value of @xmath2@xcite . at half filling and
small @xmath2 , where the electron - phonon coupling dominates , again there is little evidence@xcite of purely polaronic effects , because of the formation of bipolarons@xcite .
the question arises , therefore , whether there is any parameter regime where purely polaronic effects can be observed .
if there is , then does the behaviour correspond to the predictions based on the spinless models with only one or two electrons , or do many - electron correlations play a significant role ? in this letter we present calculations to show clearly that small strongly renormalized polaronic excitations do exist in the holstein - hubbard model and form a distinct narrow band at the fermi level .
the hamiltonian for this model is @xmath3 where @xmath4 describes the dispersion of the band electrons and @xmath2 is the on - site inter - electron repulsion as in the hubbard model@xcite .
the electron density @xmath5 at site @xmath6 couples linearly to the local displacement operator @xmath7 with an electron - phonon coupling @xmath8 .
the phonons are assumed to be dispersionless ( local einstein phonons ) with energy @xmath9 and @xmath10 is the mass of the vibrating ions .
our calculations are based on dmft using a semi - elliptical density of states @xmath11 of the non - interacting system given by @xmath12 for @xmath13 and zero elsewhere , corresponding to a bethe lattice , where @xmath14 is the bandwidth and @xmath15 is the chemical potential .
the effective impurity problem is solved using the numerical renormalization group ( nrg)@xcite , as generalized for the calculation of dynamical response functions@xcite , and incorporating the density matrix generalization@xcite due to hofstetter . to suppress any tendency for bipolaron formation
we take a large value of the on - site repulsion , @xmath16 in units where @xmath17 , which for half filling corresponds to a mott insulator @xcite .
we choose a value of @xmath18 corresponding to quarter filling @xmath19 .
the local density of states for @xmath20 is shown in fig . [
fig : g_spec_u60_x50 ] , with the fermi level such that the lower hubbard band is @xmath21 filled . in this regime
the strong correlation effects are largely suppressed due to the charge fluctuations ; there is no sharp quasiparticle peak at the fermi level , which occurs for the small doping regime near half filling , and there is a moderately reduced quasiparticle renormalization factor @xmath22 .
the small spectral weight between the upper and lower bands is due to the tails in the broadening in the higher energy peaks of the discrete nrg results . to study the impact of electrons coupling to phonons we concentrate on the lower hubbard band . in fig .
[ fig : g_spec_u60_gx_x50 ] we show the effect of increasing the electron - phonon interaction @xmath8 , taking @xmath23 in all cases . as @xmath8 increases to the value @xmath24 a sharp feature develops at the fermi level which we attribute to a polaronic renormalization .
due to the large @xmath2 , there is negligible double occupancy @xmath25 for this range of @xmath8 indicating no local bipolaron formation .
to look at the band aspects of these excitations , we introduce the @xmath27-resolved one - electron green s function @xmath28 with a local self - energy @xmath29 , @xmath30 figure [ fig : g_spec_k_u60_g60_x50 ] shows a plot of the spectral density of the green s function @xmath31 for @xmath32 and @xmath33 . when integrated over @xmath27 , it gives the local density of states for the corresponding @xmath8 shown in fig .
[ fig : g_spec_u60_gx_x50 ] .
we plot the positions of the maxima in the quasiparticle peaks as a function of @xmath4 in fig .
[ fig : qp_band_u60_gx_x50 ] .
the flat dispersion in the region of the fermi level is clear evidence of a narrow polaronic band ( full line ) .
we see a kink at @xmath34 which we discuss later in relation with the phonon spectra .
none of this is seen in the pure hubbard case , shown as the dashed line in fig .
[ fig : qp_band_u60_gx_x50 ] . of the electron green s function for the quarter - filled holstein - hubbard model ( @xmath26 , full line ) and the quarter - filled hubbard model ( @xmath35 , dashed line ) .
the arrow indicates @xmath36.,scaledwidth=35.0% ] the locus of points @xmath37 on the fermi surface of the interacting system is given by @xmath38 according to luttinger s
theorem@xcite the volume of the fermi surface should be the same as that of the non - interacting system . for a local self energy @xmath39
, this implies that the fermi surface given by eq .
( [ eq : fs ] ) should be the same as the non - interacting one , @xmath40 . if these are to coincide , then @xmath41 . to check the theorem we have calculated the density @xmath42 directly from the nrg expectation value in the ground state , and then from the non - interacting fermi surface using the value of @xmath41 from equation ( [ eq : fs ] ) .
the two sets of results are compared for a range of hole dopings in fig .
[ fig : n_vs_mu_gx.eps ] ( left ) for the pure hubbard model , and in fig .
[ fig : n_vs_mu_gx.eps ] ( right ) for the holstein - hubbard model with @xmath43 .
the agreement between the two sets of results provide a convincing evidence of the applicability of luttinger s theorem in strongly correlated systems both with and without the electron - phonon interaction .
if we assume fermi liquid theory@xcite and expand the self - energy in eq .
( [ eq : gf ] ) about the fermi level @xmath44 , and retain the first two terms , we can define a quasiparticle green s function @xmath45 where @xmath46 , and @xmath0 is the usual wavefunction renormalization factor @xmath47 , and @xmath48 is a renormalized chemical potential .
the corresponding density of states @xmath49 for the non - interacting quasiparticles is given by @xmath50 where @xmath51 plays the role of a renormalized band width .
we interpret this as a renormalized band of free polaronic quasiparticles .
integrating this free quasiparticle band up to the fermi level gives the quasiparticle occupation @xmath52 .
the resulting @xmath53 , demonstrating the one - to - one correspondence of the electron and quasiparticle states of fermi liquid theory@xcite ( see fig . [
fig : n_vs_mu_gx.eps ] ) . calculated directly ( full lines ) and from the volume of the fermi surface ( circles ) for the hubbard model ( left - hand plot , @xmath16 ) and the holstein - hubbard model ( right - hand plot , @xmath54).,scaledwidth=45.0% ] in fig .
[ fig : z_u60_gx_x50 ] we give the results for the change in the quasiparticle renormalization factor @xmath0 with increase of @xmath8 for quarter filling and @xmath16 .
the values of @xmath0 we calculated by differentiating the self - energy , and also from an analysis of the renormalized parameters@xcite on the approach to the low energy fixed point .
the two types of estimates are in reasonable agreement ; the deviation for smaller values of @xmath8 is largely due to fluctuations in the numerical differentiation of @xmath39 in this range .
the behaviour of @xmath0 with increase of @xmath8 is quite different from that near half filling where @xmath0 increases with increase of @xmath8 . near half filling the strong correlation effects stem from the enhancement of spin fluctuations and the suppression of charge fluctuations due to the large value of @xmath2 . in this regime
the increase of @xmath0 with @xmath8 can be understood as due to the reduction in the effective value of @xmath2 , @xmath55 ; hence an increase in @xmath8 reduces @xmath56 and hence reduces the renormalization@xcite . the results for @xmath0 at quarter filling shown in fig .
[ fig : z_u60_gx_x50 ] , by contrast , show a large decrease of @xmath0 with increase of @xmath8 .
this increased renormalization is a pure polaronic effect ; the coupling to the lattice causing an increase in the effective mass of the conduction electrons and a reduced mobility .
the renormalized parameter approach@xcite also allows us to calculate the local interaction between the quasiparticles @xmath1 .
the results for @xmath1 over this range are shown in fig .
[ fig : utilde_u60_gx_x50 ] .
there is a progressive reduction with increase of @xmath8 as might be expected for the induced attactive interaction due to phonon exchange .
for the largest value of @xmath8 the value of @xmath1 becomes negative , even though @xmath60 .
this can be interpreted as due to the fact the very low energy quasiparticles hardly ever occupy the same site due to correlation effects ( double occupancy @xmath61 ) and their effective attraction is due to retardation effects . for values of @xmath62
the dynamical mean field theory no longer converges satisfactorily , the iterations fluctuate between occupied and unoccupied states .
this indicates the on - set of a broken symmetry state , probably some form of charge ordering or phase separation .
this instability is also revealed in the one - phonon propagator @xmath63 whose spectral density is shown in fig . [
fig : b_spec_u60_gx_x50 ] . with increasing @xmath8
there is a progressive softening of the phonon mode from its bare value @xmath23 . for @xmath64 considerable spectral
weight develops for @xmath65 .
this weight relates to the expected number of excited phonons in the ground state .
it clearly indicates an incipient lattice instability for @xmath62 .
the kink to be seen at @xmath66 in the quasiparticle dispersion in fig .
[ fig : qp_band_u60_gx_x50 ] is clearly related to the frequency of the renormalized phonon excitation at the corresponding @xmath67 ( fig .
[ fig : b_spec_u60_gx_x50 ] ) .
an analysis for different values of @xmath8 shows a clear correlation of the kink energy to the _ renormalized _ phonon frequency .
this is similar to the experimentally observed kink in the hole - doped copper oxides@xcite . to summarize : we have shown that an accurate treatment of the holstein - hubbard model at _ finite electron density _ and @xmath68 reveals a clear polaronic quasiparticle band induced at the fermi level .
luttinger s theorem is shown to be satisfied .
a kink found in the quasiparticle dispersion relation is related to the renormalized phonon frequency . | polarons quasiparticles electronic excitations coupled to lattice modes studied for over 50 years studies confined to models with one or two electrons electron spin models limited applicability need for many - electron situations technical problems in handling models non - perturbative methods required strong electron - lattice interactions few applicable to many - electron case progress models strong local interactions via dynamical mean field theory@xcite calculations on holstein - hubbard models electrons coupled to local einstein lattice modes effect electron - phonon interactions on mott transition holstein model small polaron effects single electron case solved few studies at finite electron densities including electron spin@xcite except in one dimension if spin included in holstein model local interaction between electrons leads to local bipolaron formation superconductivity electron spin included realistic model is holstein - hubbard model includes local electron repulsion @xmath2 repulsion @xmath2 dominates undermines local bipolaronsholstein - hubbard model half filling large @xmath2 electron - phonon interaction charge fluctuations suppressed effective value @xmath2 half filling small @xmath2 electron - phonon coupling dominates little evidence purely polaronic effects formation bipolarons question parameter regime polaronic effects behaviour correspond predictions spinless models two electrons many - electron correlations ? calculations small renormalized polaronic excitations exist holstein - hubbard model narrow band fermi level hamiltonian @xmath3 @xmath4 dispersion band electrons @xmath2 on - site inter - electron repulsion electron density @xmath5 site @xmath6 couples local displacement operator @xmath7 electron - phonon coupling @xmath8 phonons dispersionless local einstein phonons energy @xmath9 @xmath10 mass vibrating ions calculations dmft semi - elliptical density states @xmath11 non - interacting system @xmath12 @xmath13 zero elsewhere bethe lattice @xmath14 bandwidth @xmath15 chemical potentialimpurity problem solved using numerical renormalization group generalized for dynamical response functions density matrix generalization due suppress bipolaron formation large value on - site repulsion @xmath16 half filling mott insulator choose value @xmath18 quarter filling @xmath19 local density of states for @xmath20 shown in fig . lower hubbard band @xmath21 filled strong correlation effects suppressed due to charge fluctuations no sharp quasiparticle peak at fermi level moderately reduced quasiparticle renormalization factor @xmath22 small spectral weight between upper lower bands due to broadening higher energy peaks nrg results impact of electrons coupling to phonons concentrate on lower hubbard band effect increasing electron - phonon interaction @xmath8 @xmath23 @xmath8 increases to @xmath24 sharp feature develops at fermi level polaronic renormalization large @xmath2 negligible double occupancy @xmath25 range no local bipolaron formationband aspects excitations introduce @xmath27-resolved one - electron green s function @xmath28 local self - energy @xmath29 @xmath30 figure_spec_k_u60_x50 plot spectral density green s function @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 integrated over @xmath27 gives local density states @xmath8 fig . plot positions maxima quasiparticle peaks function @xmath4 fig . flat dispersion fermi level narrow polaronic band kink at @xmath34 discuss phonon spectra none seen pure hubbard case dashed line fig ._band_u60_gx_x50 electron green s function quarter - filled holstein - hubbard model @xmath26 hubbard model @xmath35 arrow indicates @xmath36=35.0% locus of points @xmath37 on fermi surface interacting system given by @xmath38 luttinger s theorem volume fermi surface same as non - interacting system local self energy @xmath39 implies fermi surface eq same as non - interacting one @xmath40 if coincide @xmath41 .check theorem calculated density @xmath42 from nrg expectation value ground state non - interacting fermi surface using value @xmath41 equation results compared hole dopings fig pure hubbard model holstein - hubbard model with @xmath43 agreement results applicability luttinger s theorem in correlated systems with without electron - phonon interaction assume fermi liquid theory@xcite expand self - energy eq fermi level @xmath44 retain first two terms define quasiparticle green s function @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath0 wavefunction renormalization factor renormalized chemical potential corresponding density of states @xmath49 non - interacting quasiparticles given by @xmath50 @xmath51 renormalized band width interpret renormalized band of free polaronic quasiparticles integrating free quasiparticle band fermi level gives quasiparticle occupation @xmath52 resulting @xmath53 correspondence electron quasiparticle states fermi liquid theory@xcite figcalculated directly volume fermi surface for hubbard model @xmath16 holstein - hubbard model @xmath54),scaledwidth=45.0% fig . results change quasiparticle renormalization factor @xmath0 with increase @xmath8 quarter filling @xmath16 values @xmath0 calculated differentiating self - energy analysis renormalized parameters@xcite low energy fixed point estimates deviation for smaller values @xmath8 due to fluctuations numerical differentiation @xmath39 behaviour @xmath0 with increase @xmath8 different from near half filling increases correlation effects from enhancement spin fluctuations suppression charge fluctuations due large value @xmath2 increase @xmath0 with @xmath8 due to reduction effective value @xmath2 @xmath55 increase @xmath8 reduces @xmath56 reduces renormalization@xcite results for @xmath0 at quarter filling show large decrease @xmath0 with increase @xmath8 increased renormalization polaronic effect increase effective mass conduction electrons reduced mobility renormalized parameter approach@xcite calculate local interaction between quasiparticles @xmath1 results for @xmath1 over range shown in fig .fig : utilde_u60_gx_x50 progressive reduction increase @xmath8 induced attactive interaction phonon exchange largest value @xmath8 @xmath1 becomes negative @xmath60 due low energy quasiparticles occupy same site correlation effects double occupancy @xmath61 attraction retardation values @xmath62 dynamical mean field theory converges iterations fluctuate between occupied unoccupied states indicates broken symmetry state charge ordering phase separation instability in one - phonon propagator @xmath63 spectral density shown fig ._spec_u60_gx_x50 increasing @xmath8 progressive softening phonon mode from @xmath23 @xmath64 spectral weight develops @xmath65 weight relates to expected number excited phonons ground state indicates incipient lattice instability for @xmath62 kink at @xmath66 quasiparticle dispersion related to frequency renormalized phonon excitation @xmath67 analysis values @xmath8 shows correlation kink energy to renormalized phonon frequency similar to kink hole - doped copper oxides@xcite treatment holstein - hubbard model finite electron density reveals polaronic quasiparticle band fermi level luttinger s theorem satisfied kink quasiparticle dispersion relation related renormalized phonon frequency | 0.499122 | 2,967 | 1,530 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,483 | i elaborate on the earlier suggestion that the model describing the plateaux transition in integer quantum hall effect scales to a particular point on the line of critical points of a theory with a higher symmetry .
localization , quantum hall effect , multifractality , conformal symmetry . | under the conditions of low temperature and strong perpendicular magnetic field , a two - dimensional electron gas exhibits a striking macroscopic manifestation of a quantum phenomenon , namely the quantum hall effect @xcite : the hall conductivity exhibits quantized plateaus at well defined multiples of @xmath0 ( a fundamental constant ) . in not too clean samples , where the rle of random impurities ( disorder ) is more important than electron - electron interactions ,
the plateaus occur at integer multiples of @xmath0 giving rise to the so - called integer quantum hall effect ( iqhe ) .
it is widely believed that in the absence of a magnetic field , all wavefunctions for non - interacting , disordered electrons in two dimensions are localized . in the presence of a magnetic field however
, a delocalized state occurs at the centre of the ( disorder broadened ) landau level , with energy @xmath1 .
as one tunes the electron energy @xmath2 ( by varying the magnetic field ) , through the centre of a landau level , the localization length , @xmath3 , diverges as @xmath4 , where numerical simulations indicate that @xmath5 . , the number of states with wave functions that reach the boundaries is @xmath6 .
since the density of states , @xmath7 , remains a smooth function of energy , this number is always macroscopic .
however , the density of delocalized states @xmath8 and goes to zero in the limit of infinite sample size . ]
the plateaus with differing @xmath9 are separated by these critical points .
a theoretical description of these points remains one of the most challenging unresolved problems in the theory of disordered systems .
the supersymmetric sigma model describing disordered landau levels has a high symmetry .
so we are lead to believe that the model describing the critical point has at least that symmetry or even higher .
this constitutes a difficulty because on one hand all known critical theories with internal symmetry have at least one free parameter ( for instance , for wess - zumino - novikov - witten ( wznw ) models it would be the level ) and , on the other hand , there is no such free parameter for iqhe critical point . in our previous paper we concentrated on properties of ldos since this is a much simplier problem than a calculation of conductances . with ldos one can work with a closed system and not to worry about boundary conditions .
the first assumption of our work is that the operators representing ldos constitutes a decoupled sector of the theory .
therefore though the system in its entirety is described by some ( yet unknown ) supersymmetric theory , the ldos sector is much simplier .
this assumption was based on the research conducted for one - dimensional limit of the relevant supersymmetric sigma model , where the decoupling of ldos sector was demonstrated explicitely @xcite , @xcite .
these results led us to conclusion that the most likely candidate for the theory describing critical ldos was the h@xmath10 wznw model .
@xmath11 wznw model is defined on a non - compact space sl(2,c)/su(2 ) . since this space differs from the group space sl(2,r ) only by the signature of its metric tensor ( it is ( + , + , + ) in the former case and ( + , + , - ) in the latter one ) , it is legitimate to consider it as a wznw model and not a coset one . in the gaussian parametrization
the action can be written as @xmath12.\ ] ] in the semiclassical limit @xmath13 the primary fields satisfy the diffusion equation on the h@xmath10 space : @xmath14 where @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
this equation provides a natural link between the 2d wznw model and the work done on one - dimensional sigma model .
it was found that the eigenfunctions of the corresponding transfer matrix satisfy a similar equation : @xmath17 where the @xmath18-th power of ldos @xmath19 was identified as @xmath20 .
this identification naturally follows from the form of the correlation function of ldos derived in @xcite .
the relationship between @xmath21 and @xmath22 is obvious : w(y ) ~^2 ( , ^ , y ) , kk^ * = 1[w ] to identify the operator @xmath19 one has to recall some facts from the representation theory . the primary fields @xmath23 of the h@xmath10 model belong to representations of the sl(2,r ) group with angular momentum @xmath24 .
the auxilary coordinate @xmath25 parametrizes the action of generators of the algebra sl(2 ) represented as differential operators : ^+_j = -x^2_x + 2jx , d^0_j = - x_x + j , d^-_j = - _ x the coordinates @xmath26 parametrize a direction of the quantization axis ; this is reflected in the field parametrization used in the majority of papers on the h@xmath10 model : ^(j ) ( , ^ , y = ^-2 ) = ( |- x|^2^ + ^-)^2j [ standard ] since these eigenfunctions depend on @xmath27 , one can replace in eq.([w ] ) the integration over @xmath28 by the integration over @xmath25 and identify : w_j(y ) = ( -2j)^2 x ^j(x|z ) , kk^ * = 1 [ w1 ] where semiclassically w_j(y=^-2 ) = 2 ^ -k_(1 + 2j)(2 ^ - ) [ w2 ] to establish a relationship between field @xmath29 and ( [ standard ] ) , let us recall that the scaling dimensions of h@xmath10 primaries are d(j ) = - where @xmath30 is the level of the corresponding kac - moody algebra . as is known from the numerical simulations , the scaling dimension the @xmath18-th power of ldos fits to this formula with @xmath31 and @xmath32 @xcite .
this publication has also explained that the deviations from the parabolic dependence reported in the earlier work @xcite had their origin in the finite size effects .
the fact that the corresponding value of @xmath33 is not an integer does not constitute a problem for the @xmath11 theory , since in non - compact models @xmath34 is not quantized .
however , this probably means that the parent supersymmetric theory which includes in itself a compact sector , can not possess kac - moody symmetry .
this supports the point of view of zirnbauer who rejected kac - moody symmetry for iqhe critical point @xcite .
so we suggest that @xmath19 is related to the primary field with @xmath31 . to extract it from @xmath35
is the same as to extract @xmath29 from expression ( [ standard ] ) , which can be done by integration around a contour encircling infinity : ( 2q ) = _ cx_c|x
x^(2q -1)|x^(2q -1)^(j = -q)(x,|x , z , |z )
in our previous paper we argued that in order to reproduce existing results on correlation functions of ldos , one has to consider a certain modification of the @xmath36 wznw model .
namely , @xmath37-point correlation functions of ldos should be understood as @xmath38-point function with two additional operators @xmath39 present at zero and infinity . in cylindrical geometry
these points become minus and plus infinity respectively .
the operator @xmath39 was identified as a non - trivial operator with zero conformal dimension .
primary fields of @xmath36 wznw model have been classified and their fusion rules are known .
therefore we have to find @xmath39 among these operators .
it turns out that such non - trivial ( that is non unity ) operator can be identified as _ 0(x|z ) = _ j 0j^-1^j(x|z ) this limit is well defined semiclassically as follows from relation ( [ w2 ] ) . to make sure it holds in quantum field theory
, one can study the fusion rules .
let us consider a three - point correlation function of primary fields in the @xmath36 model @xcite,@xcite : & & < ^j_1(x_1|z_1)^j_2(x_2|z_2)^j_3(x_3|z_3 ) > = + & & [ three ] where the structure constant @xmath40 is the clebsh - gordon coefficient for the sl(2,r ) group .
c_123 = |x_12|^2(j_1 + j_2 - j_3)|x_13|^2(j_1 + j_3 - j_2)|x_23|^2(j_2 + j_3 - j_1 ) and @xmath41 is the quantum correction given by & & d_123 = [ quant ] + & & where @xmath42 the function @xmath43 is a meromorphic function introduced in @xcite .
it has zeroes at @xmath44 and @xmath45 at @xmath46 this function admits the integral representation & & y_w(- x ) = \{_0^ } , + & & 0 < e x < ( 1 + k ) outside this interval it can be defined using the following properties : _
w(j ) = y_w(j -1 ) , y_w(j ) = y_w(j - k ) k^-(2j + 1 ) since at @xmath47 the function @xmath48 , formula ( [ three ] ) has a simple semiclassical limit corresponding to the quantum mechanics of a free particle on the @xmath11 space .
the property crucial for our argument is the fact that structure constant @xmath41 contains the product of @xmath49-functions which vanishes when one of the angular momenta goes to zero . since @xmath50 at @xmath51
, we get from ( [ three ] ) : & & ^2 x_2 |x_2|^(4q - 2 ) < ^j_1(x_1|z_1)^-q(x_2|z_2)_0(0|0 ) > = + & & |x_1|^2(j_1 + q ) [ three1 ] d(j_1,-q ) = [ quant1 ] when two operators have @xmath51 we get : & & < _ 0(x_1|0)[]^q(z)_0(x_3| ) > = & & a(q ) = as it was mentioned above , we suggested that the two - point disorder average of @xmath18-th powers of ldos should be understood as the four - point function of the @xmath11 theory . in the cylindrical geometry where @xmath52 i get the following expression : & & = ^2 x ^*k x * + & & = + & & |2r(w/2r)|^- 2d_q^2 x ( x,|x;z,|z ) , z = ( w_12/r ) to derive the latter formula i used the fact that the confomal blocks depend only on the anharmonic ratios of @xmath53 and @xmath54 .
function @xmath55 satisfies the following differential equation : & & _ x^2f + + & & _ xf + k_zf = 0 at the moment i am still unable to present a complete solution of this equation . | low temperature strong magnetic field two - dimensional electron gas exhibits quantum quantum hall effect @xcite hall conductivity exhibits plateaus at multiples of @xmath0 fundamental constant in clean samples random impurities disorder important than interactions plateaus occur at integer multiples of @xmath0 integer quantum hall effect absence magnetic field wavefunctions for non - interacting disordered electrons localized magnetic field delocalized state occurs at centre of landau level with energy @xmath1 electron energy @xmath2 magnetic field localization length @xmath3 diverges as @xmath4 simulations indicate number of states with wave functions reach boundaries is @xmath6 density of states @xmath7 function of energy number macroscopic density of delocalized states @xmath8 goes to zero in infinite sample size plateaus with differing @xmath9 separated by critical points theoretical description points challenging disordered systems supersymmetric sigma model describing disordered landau levels high symmetry believe model critical point has symmetry or higherdifficulty critical theories symmetry have free parameter wess - zumino novikov - witten level no free parameter for critical point previous paper concentrated on properties ldos simplier than calculation conductances with ldos work closed system boundary conditions assumption operators representing ldos decoupled sector theory system described by supersymmetric theory ldos sector simplier assumption based on research for one - dimensional limit supersymmetric sigma model decoupling of ldos sector demonstrated @xcite results likely candidate for theory critical ldos h@xmath10 wznw model @xmath11 wznw model defined on non - compact space sl(2,c)/su(2 ) space differs from group space sl(2,r ) by signature metric tensor ( + , + , + ) - ) legitimate consider as wznw model not coset gaussian parametrization action written as @xmath12. in semiclassical limit @xmath13 primary fields satisfy diffusion equation on h@xmath10 space : @xmath14 @xmath16 equation link between 2d wznw model work one - dimensional sigma modeleigenfunctions transfer matrix satisfy similar equation @xmath17-th power ldos @xmath19 identified @xmath20 identification follows correlation function ldos @xcite relationship @xmath21 @xmath22 obvious w(y ) ~^2 kk^ * = 1[w identify operator @xmath19 facts representation theory primary fields @xmath23 sl(2,r group angular momentum @xmath24 auxilary coordinate @xmath25 parametrizes action generators algebra differential operators ^+_j = -x^2_x + 2jx d^0_j = - x_x +-_j = - coordinates @xmath26 parametrize direction quantization axis reflected field parametrization model ^(j = x^2^ +-)^2j eigenfunctions depend @xmath27 replace integration @xmath28 by @xmath25 w_j(y ) = ( -2j)^2 x ^j(x|z kk^ * = 1 [ w1 w_j(y=^-2 ) = 2 ^ -k_(1 + 2j)(2 - relationship field @xmath29 scaling dimensions h@xmath10 primaries d(j ) = - @xmath30 level kac - moody algebraknown from numerical simulations scaling dimension @xmath18-th power of ldos fits formula with @xmath31 @xmath32 @xcite publication explained deviations from parabolic dependence in finite size effects value @xmath33 not integer problem for @xmath11 theory non - compact models @xmath34 not quantized parent supersymmetric theory compact sector possess kac - moody symmetry supports zirnbauer rejected kac - moody symmetry for critical point @xcite @xmath19 related to primary field with @xmath31 extract from @xmath35 same as extract @xmath29 from expression integration around contour encircling infinity 2q = cx -q)(x reproduce results on correlation functions ldos modification of @xmath36 wznw model @xmath37-point correlation functions understood as @xmath38-point function with additional operators @xmath39 at zero infinity points become minus plus infinity @xmath39 non - trivial operator with zero conformal dimension primary fields of @xmath36 model classified fusion rules known find @xmath39 among operatorsnon - trivial operator as 0(x|z ) = 0j^-1^j(x limit defined from relation w2 study fusion rules consider three - point correlation function of primary fields in @xmath36 model ^j_1(x_1)^j_2(x_2|z_2)^j_3(x_3|z ) structure constant @xmath40 clebsh - gordon coefficient for sl(2,r ) group c_123 = |x_12|^2(j_1 + j_2 - j_3)_13 -_23|^2(j_2 +_3 - j_1 @xmath41 quantum correction d_123 = function @xmath43 meromorphic function @xcite zeroes at @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 admits integral representation y_w(- x ) = \{_0^ } 1 + k defined using properties w(j ) = y_w(j -1 ) y_w(j ) = y_w(j - k ) k^-(2j + 1 ) function @xmath48 semiclassical limit quantum mechanics free particle on @xmath11 space structure constant @xmath41 product of @xmath49-functions vanishes when angular to zero@xmath50 @xmath51 ^2 x_2^(4q - 2 ) < ^j_1(x_1|z_1)^-q(x_2_2)_0(0|0 ) |x_1|^2(j_1 + q ) d(j_1,-q ) = quant1 two operators @xmath51 < 0(x_1|0)[]^q(z)_0(x_3| ) a(q ) two - point disorder average @xmath18-th powers ldos four - point function @xmath11 theory cylindrical geometry @xmath52 expression = ^2 x ^*k x * |2r(w/2r)|^- 2d_q^2 x x;z ) = w_12/r ) confomal blocks depend anharmonic ratios @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 satisfies differential equation x^2f + xf + k_zf = 0 complete solution | 0.356448 | 2,480 | 1,341 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,486 | we numerically calculate two - particle correlation functions of cern - sps 158 a gev pb+pb central collisions based on a ( 3 + 1)-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamics with a first order phase transition .
we analyze the pair momentum dependence of pion source sizes extracted from the yano - koonin - podgoretski ( ykp ) parametrization which is expected to give the source sizes directly .
we find that , even in the case of the first order phase transition , the collective expansion and surface dominant freeze - out of the fluid naturally lead to the opaque source for which the interpretation of the temporal source parameter as the emission duration breaks down .
( 0,0)(0,0 ) ( 13.93,8.7)wu - hep-00 - 6 ( 14.63,8.2)twc-00 - 5 | in the physics of relativistic heavy ion collisions aiming at studying the qcd phase transition of hot and dense matter , two - particle correlation is widely used to investigate the characteristics of the space - time evolution in the collision processes @xcite .
it is well known as hanbury - brown twiss effect that the two - particle intensity correlation function contains the information on the `` size '' of the source of emitted particles due to a quantum symmetry . in recent experiments ,
the sizes are estimated from the correlation function through gaussian fitting and the physical meaning of the sizes depends on the fitting function . for an azimuthally symmetric source , the yano - koonin - podgoretski(ykp )
parametrization @xcite is used as one of the fitting functions . in this
parametrization , three of fitting parameters can be regarded as source sizes directly .
this advantage gives us a chance to observe a signature of quark - gluon matter because large emission duration is expected in the case of a first order phase transition @xcite . in the case of the relativistic heavy ion collisions ,
the reaction is highly dynamic ; the particle source can not be considered to be static one .
so we analyze the size parameters for pions quantitatively based on a hydrodynamic model which takes into account the longitudinal and transverse expansion and a first order phase transition @xcite .
from a hydrodynamic point of view , we consider the pion source as a thermalized one and a completely chaotic source .
hence , the two - particle correlation function is given as @xmath0 where @xmath1 and @xmath2 are momenta of a emitted pion pair and @xmath3 is the interference term .
as usual , we introduce the relative momentum @xmath4 and the average momentum @xmath5 which can be put as @xmath6 by virtue of the cylindrical symmetry . due to the on - shell condition , @xmath7 , only three components of the relative momenta are independent . in the ykp parametrization , @xmath8 , @xmath9 , and @xmath10
are used as the independent components .
then , the fitting function is given by @xmath11 \right.\\ \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \left .
-\left [ r_0 ^ 2(k^\mu)+r_\|^2(k^\mu ) \right ] \left [ q_\mu u^\mu ( k^\mu ) \right]^2 \right\ } , \label{ykp}\end{gathered}\ ] ] where @xmath12 is a four - velocity which has only longitudinal component .
the size parameters to be determined by a fit are @xmath13s @xmath14 .
we may choose a special reference frame where the velocity parameter @xmath15 vanishes ( ykp frame ) , because the three size parameters are invariant under longitudinal boosts . introducing the source function , @xmath16 and the weighted average , @xmath17 the size parameters in this frame ( ykp frame )
are expressed as @xmath18,\label{r0}\\ r_\|^2(k^\mu)&=&(\delta z)^2 -\frac{2\beta_\|}{\beta_\bot}\langle \tilde{x}\tilde{z } \rangle + \frac{\beta_\|^2}{\beta_\bot^2}[(\delta x)^2-(\delta y)^2],\label{rl}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 . in order to regard the above
@xmath13s as naive source sizes directly , the second term and the third term in the right hand side of eqs.([r0 ] ) and ( [ rl ] ) must be small compared to the first term of each equation . though it has been shown that this condition holds within a class of thermal model @xcite , it is not trivial in other cases .
the case of a hydrodynamic model as a more realistic one is the point of the present paper . in the following ,
we calculate three quantities : hbt radii extracted from the fit to eq.([c2 ] ) , the space - time extensions , eqs.([rt])-([rl ] ) , and the source sizes , the first terms in eqs.([r0 ] ) and ( [ rl ] ) .
+ fig . 1 @xmath23 dependence of ykp radii .
open and closed circles show the experimental data and hbt radii , respectively .
solid lines stand for space - time extensions ( [ rt])-([rl ] ) .
dotted lines stand for source sizes .
( @xmath24 for @xmath25 and @xmath26 for @xmath27 . ) + figure 1 shows @xmath23 dependence of the pion hbt radii .
close circles stand for the hbt radii .
solid lines are space - time extensions which are expected to agree with the hbt radii when only thermal pions are considered .
dotted lines stand for the source sizes ( @xmath24 for @xmath25 and @xmath26 for @xmath27 ) .
as far as @xmath28 and @xmath25 are concerned , those quantities seem to be consistent with one another and well reproduce the na49 experimental results @xcite ( open circles ) . on the other hand , @xmath27 is smaller than the experimental one in spite of the fact our calculation includes a first order phase transition . the time durations @xmath26 agrees with @xmath27 at small @xmath23 .
however , some deviations from @xmath27 can be seen at large @xmath23 region , that means a failure of interpretation of @xmath27 as the time duration .
we find that this difference occurs from the third term in eq.([r0 ] ) . in eq.([r0 ] ) , the two additional terms means correlation between @xmath29 and @xmath30 ( the second term ) and the thickness of the source ( the third term ) .
though contribution from the second term is small in our model , the third term becomes negative in same order with @xmath31 @xcite .
such a kind of the source is called an `` opaque source '' . the `` opaque '' source
@xcite emits particles dominantly from the surface and the `` transparent '' source emits from whole region .
figure 2 shows the source function ( [ s ] ) projected onto the @xmath32 plane , @xmath33 being normalized as @xmath34 .
note that the average transverse momentum of the emitted pions is parallel to @xmath29 direction in the figure .
the left figure shows _ clearly _ surface emission ; pions are emitted from the crescent region and the source is thinner in the @xmath29 direction than in the @xmath35 direction .
this is the typical property of the opaque source which appears in the factor @xmath36 in eq.([r0 ] ) .
note that this factor also appears in the longitudinal components of the size , eq.([rl ] ) , but the prefactor @xmath37 makes the contribution to @xmath38 small . if we neglected the transverse flow by artificially putting @xmath39 , the source function becomes as shown in the right figure in fig . 2 .
in this case , the source function is proportional to the space - time volume of freeze - out hypersurface . as a consequence of restoration of the azimuthal symmetry which is shown clearly in the figure , the above measure of source opacity vanishes . although the particle emission takes place almost from the thin surface , the source is not opaque in this sense .
when the transverse flow exists , the source function is deformed by thermal boltzmann factor @xmath40 with @xmath41 almost proportional to @xmath42 .
consequently , the number of emitted particles increases in the region where @xmath43 ( i.e. , @xmath44 ) and decreases in the region where @xmath45 ( @xmath46 ) .
this flow effect deforms the surface dominant volume distribution ( right figure ) to the crescent shape ( left figure ) .
2 the source functions as functions of transverse coordinates @xmath29 and @xmath35 for @xmath47 mev and @xmath48 ( @xmath49 ) . the left figure denotes the source function with the transverse flow .
the right figure denotes the source function _ without _ transverse flow .
+ in summary , we analyze @xmath23 dependence of source parameters of the ykp parametrization based on the relativistic hydrodynamics for the cern - sps 158 gev / a pb+pb collisions .
we obtain the results which are almost consistent with the experiment .
however , the temporal source parameter , @xmath27 , shows smaller value than the experiment .
the source opacity makes the interpretation of @xmath27 as the time duration doubtful at large @xmath23 region .
we find that the source opacity is caused by the transverse flow and the characteristics of the freeze - out hypersurface , the surface dominant freeze - out .
the deviations of our results from the experiment would be improved by including the resonance decay and other effects .
the authors are indebted to professor i. ohba and professor h. nakazato for their helpful comments .
this work was partially supported by a grant - in - aid for science research , ministry of education , science and culture , japan ( grant no .
09740221 ) and waseda university media network center .
99 for the recent reviews , u.a .
wiedemann and u. heinz , phys . rep .
* 319 * ( 1999 ) 145 ; r.m .
ibid_. * 327 * ( 2000 ) 249 .
wu , u. heinz , b. tomik and u.a .
wiedemann , eur .
j. * c1 * ( 1998 ) 599 .
s. pratt , phys .
* d33 * ( 1986 ) 1314 . for more details , k. morita , s. muroya , h. nakamura and c. nonaka , phys .
* c61 * ( 2000 ) 034904 .
see also other references therein .
h. appelshuser _ et al .
_ , na49 collaboration , eur .
j. * c2 * ( 1998 ) 661 .
h. heiselberg and a. p. vischer , eur .
j. * c1 * ( 1998 ) 593 ; phys .
* b421 * ( 1998 ) 18 . | physics relativistic heavy ion collisions qcd phase transition of hot dense matter two - particle correlation used space - time evolution collision processes known as hanbury - brown twiss effect two - particle intensity correlation function contains information size source emitted particles quantum symmetry sizes estimated from correlation function through gaussian fitting physical meaning depends on fitting function azimuthally symmetric source yano - koonin - podgoretski ) parametrization @xcite used fitting three fitting parameters regarded as source sizes observe signature of quark - gluon matter large emission duration first order phase transition relativistic heavy ion collisions reaction dynamic particle source static analyze size parameters for pions hydrodynamic model longitudinal transverse expansion first order phase transition pion source thermalized chaotic source two - particle correlation function given as @xmath0 @xmath1 momenta of emitted pion pair @xmath3 interference term relative momentum @xmath4 average momentum @xmath5 @xmath6 cylindrical symmetry on - shell condition @xmath7 three components of relative momenta independentykp parametrization @xmath8 independent components fitting function by @xmath11\qquad r_0 ^ 2(k^\mu)+r_\|^2(k^\mu ) \right q_\mu u^\mu ( k^\mu ) ^2 {gathered @xmath12 four - velocity longitudinal component size parameters are @xmath13s @xmath14 special reference frame velocity parameter @xmath15 vanishes three size parameters invariant under longitudinal boosts introducing source function @xmath16 weighted average @xmath17 size parameters expressed as @xmath18,_\|^2(k^\mu)&=(\delta z)^2{2\beta_}}(\delta x)^2-(\delta y)^2]}{aligned} @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 regard @xmath13s as naive source sizes second third term in right hand side of eqs.([r0 rl must be small compared to first term each equationshown condition thermal model @xcite not trivial other cases hydrodynamic model realistic point present paper calculate three quantities hbt radii from eq.([c2 ] space - time extensions.([rt])-([rl source sizes first terms eqs.([r0 ] [ rl fig . 1 @xmath23 dependence of ykp radii open closed circles show experimental data hbt radii solid lines for space - time extensions-([rl dotted lines source sizes @xmath24 @xmath27 figure 1 shows @xmath23 dependence of pion hbt radii close circles for hbt radii solid lines are space - time extensions agree with hbt radii thermal pions dotted lines for source sizes @xmath28 @xmath25 quantities consistent reproduce experimental results @xcite @xmath27 smaller experimental calculation includes first order phase transition time durations @xmath26 agrees with @xmath27 at small @xmath23 deviations from @xmath27 at large @xmath23 region failure of interpretation @xmath27 time duration difference occurs from third term in eq.([r0 ] )two additional terms correlation between @xmath29 @xmath30 second thickness source third term contribution second term small third term negative with @xmath31 @xcite source called `` opaque source '' @xcite emits particles from surface transparent source emits from whole region figure 2 shows source function projected @xmath32 plane @xmath33 normalized as @xmath34 average transverse momentum emitted pions parallel to @xmath29 direction left figure shows surface emission pions emitted from crescent region source thinner in @xmath29 direction than @xmath35 direction typical property of opaque source appears in factor @xmath36 factor appears in longitudinal components size prefactor @xmath37 contribution to @xmath38 small if neglected transverse flow @xmath39 source function figure proportional to space - time volume of freeze - out hypersurface restoration azimuthal symmetry measure source opacity vanishes particle emission from thin surface source not opaque transverse flow exists source function deformed by thermal boltzmann factor @xmath40 @xmath41 proportional to @xmath42 number emitted particles increases in region where @xmath43@xmath44 decreases region @xmath45 ) flow effect deforms surface volume distribution to crescent shape source functions as functions transverse coordinates @xmath29 @xmath35 for @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 ) left figure source function with transverse flow right without transverse flow analyze @xmath23 dependence source parameters ykp parametrization relativistic hydrodynamics for cern - sps 158 gev / a pb+pb collisions results almost consistent with experiment temporal source parameter @xmath27 shows smaller value source opacity makes interpretation time duration doubtful at @xmath23 region opacity caused by transverse flow characteristics freeze - out hypersurface deviations improved by including resonance decay other effects authors indebted to professor i. ohba professor h. nakazato for comments work supported by grant - in - aid for science research ministry of education science culture japan grant 09740221 waseda university media network center recent reviews wiedemann u heinz phys . 319 1999 ) 145 327 2000 ) 249 1998 ) 599 1986 ) 1314details k. morita s muroya nakamura nonaka phys. c61 2000 ) 034904 references appelshuser na49 collaboration j c2 1998 ) 661 h heiselberg p vischer eur j c1 1998 ) 593 phys. b421 1998 ) 18 | 0.352869 | 2,309 | 1,160 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,490 | measurements sensitive to the structure of both real and virtual photons are presented and compared to theoretical models with various photon parton distribution functions ( pdfs ) .
measurements for real photons show a tendency for the available photon pdfs to be too small to describe the data . for virtual photons , the photon pdf is seen to decrease with increasing photon virtuality . in order to describe the data , resolved photon processes are required up to a photon virtuality of at least 4.5 gev@xmath0 .
glas - ppe/199906may 1999 | experimental information on the partonic structure of the photon can be obtained from the data taken at the hera ep collider experiments .
leading order ( lo ) qcd predicts that photon interactions have a two - component nature . in direct
photon processes the entire momentum of the photon takes part in the hard subprocess with a parton from the proton whereas in resolved photon processes the photon acts as a source of partons and one of these enters the hard subprocess . by measuring inclusive dijet events ( two or more jets ) information on the structure of the real photon can be extracted . by also measuring the scattered electron ,
information can be obtained on the evolution of this structure as a function of the virtuality of the photon , q@xmath0 .
the fraction of the photon s four momentum which enters the hard subprocess at leading order , denoted by @xmath1 , is equal to unity for direct processes , and less than unity for resolved processes .
experimentally it is not possible to measure @xmath1 directly . instead , an observable quantity @xmath2 is defined which is calculable and well - defined to all orders of perturbation theory .
@xmath2 is the fraction of the photon momentum manifest in the two highest transverse energy jets and is defined by the equation @xmath3 where @xmath4 is the transverse energy of jet @xmath5 , @xmath6 is the pseudorapidity of the jet measured in the lab frame , and @xmath7 is the inelasticity of the event .
`` direct enriched '' events are defined as being those with @xmath8 and `` resolved enriched '' events as those with @xmath9 .
this value gives the optimal separation of the leading order direct and resolved event classes .
the kinematic selection cuts made in order to examine the structure of the real photon are * two or more jets ( @xmath10 clustering algorithm ) * q@xmath11 gev@xmath0 * @xmath12 gev , @xmath13 gev * @xmath14 * @xmath15 the advantages of using high @xmath16 dijets are that they provide a hard scale where perturbative qcd ( pqcd ) is expected to work , the hadronisation corrections are small , and the effect of underlying events is small . given these assumptions , the data can be compared directly to nlo pqcd calculations without the need to simulate some hadronisation model .
this analysis concentrates on the high @xmath17 region where the quark densities in the photon are not strongly constrained by @xmath18 experiments .
the measured zeus data is compared to nlo pqcd calculations for three photon pdfs , grv - ho @xcite , afg - ho @xcite and gs96-ho @xcite .
the nlo calculations have been performed by three groups of theorists , harris et al .
@xcite , klasen et al .
@xcite and frixione et al .
since the agreement between the calculations is excellent only one of the calculations is plotted .
figure [ et_fully_both_4b ] shows the differential dijet cross section as a function of @xmath19 for 0.20 @xmath20 0.85 .
there is an excess in the data above theory for central jets ( 0 @xmath21 1 ) below an @xmath22 of 25 gev .
the assumption that the hadronisation corrections are negligible is not true for backward jets ( -1 @xmath21 0 ) , so no conclusions are drawn about the backward region , rather the discrepancy between data and theory is ascribed to a theoretical uncertainty .
figure [ eta_highy_both_32 ] shows the cross section for a narrower range in @xmath7 .
this provides a better sensitivity to the photon structure since the cross section is no longer averaged over the broader @xmath7 range .
there is an excess in the data seen for central ( 0 @xmath21 1 ) and forward ( 1 @xmath21 2 ) jets , both for the whole @xmath2 range and the high @xmath2 range .
the excess in the data above theory for jets with @xmath23 gev and for central and forward rapidities suggests that the available photon pdf parametrisations , based on @xmath18 @xmath24 data , are too small in this kinematic regime .
the kinematic selection cuts made for the analysis of virtual photons are three different q@xmath0 regions are available for measurement .
q@xmath30 gev@xmath0 corresponds to quasi - real photons , where the electron is not measured , and the large bulk of such events lead to a median q@xmath0 of 0.001 gev@xmath0 .
zeus has a small angle electron detector for tagging events in the transition region between photoproduction and dis ( @xmath25 gev@xmath0 ) . for @xmath31 gev@xmath0 the electron
is detected in the zeus main calorimeter .
figure [ plotb ] shows the ratio of the resolved to the direct dijet cross sections as a function of q@xmath0 . since some of the systematic uncertainties cancel in the ratio , this is a more precise measurement than an absolute differential cross section .
the data fall with increasing q@xmath0 .
this is compared to the dijet ratio obtained with herwig 5.9 @xcite using a photon pdf which does not evolve with q@xmath0 ( grv lo @xcite ) and one which does ( sas1d @xcite ) .
the herwig ratio with grv lo is flat , while that obtained with sas 1d falls with increasing q@xmath0
. therefore the fall of the ratio with q@xmath0 observed in the data indicates that the data require a virtual photon pdf which evolves with photon virtuality .
the lepto 6.5.1 @xcite curve shows the prediction for leading order direct processes in dis only .
note that this ratio is non - zero as may be understood given that lepto contains higher - order processes in the approximation of parton - showering and hadronization .
the data approach this direct only limit , however resolved processes are still required in order to describe the data up to at least q@xmath0 = 4.5 gev@xmath0 . | information on partonic structure photon from data hera ep collider experiments qcd predicts photon interactions two - component in direct photon processes entire momentum with parton from proton resolved photon processes photon source of partons one enters measuring inclusive dijet events information on structure photon measuring scattered electron information on evolution structure virtuality photon@xmath0 fraction of photon s momentum enters subprocess @xmath1 equal to unity for direct less than unity for resolved processes not possible to measure @xmath1 directly observable quantity @xmath2 defined calculable defined to perturbation theory @xmath2 is fraction of photon momentum in two highest transverse energy jets defined by equation @xmath3 @xmath4 transverse energy jet @xmath5 pseudorapidity jet inelasticity of event direct enriched events defined with @xmath8 resolved enriched events with @xmath9 value gives optimal separation of direct and resolved event classeskinematic selection cuts structure photon are two or more jets ( @xmath10 clustering algorithm@xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath14 @xmath15 advantages high @xmath16 dijets hard scale perturbative qcd hadronisation corrections small effect underlying events small data compared to nlo pqcd calculations without hadronisation model analysis concentrates high @xmath17 region quark densities not constrained by @xmath18 experiments measured zeus data compared to nlo pqcd calculations for three photon pdfs - - gs96-ho calculations performed by harris klasen agreement one plotted figure shows differential dijet cross section function @xmath19 for 0.20 @xmath20 0.85 excess data above theory for central jets ( 0 @xmath21 1 ) below @xmath22 of 25 gev hadronisation corrections negligible not true for backward jets ( -1 @xmath21 0 ) no conclusions region discrepancy data theory to theoretical uncertainty figure shows cross section narrower range in @xmath7 provides better sensitivity to photon structure cross section no longer averaged over @xmath7 range excess in data for central 1 forward 2 ) jets range excess jets with @xmath23 gev central forward rapidities suggests photon pdf parametrisations too small regime selection for analysis virtual photons three q@xmath0 regions for measurement q@xmath30 gev@xmath0 quasi - real photons electron not measured lead median q@xmath0 of 0.001 gev@xmath0 zeus has small angle electron detector transition region between photoproduction dis @xmath31 gev@xmath0 electron detected in zeus main calorimeter figure shows ratio of resolved to direct dijet cross sections function of q@xmath0 systematic uncertainties cancel ratio more precise measurement than absolute differential cross section data fall with increasing q@xmath0 compared to dijet ratio with herwig 5.9 @xcite pdf herwig ratio with grv lo flat sas 1d falls with increasing q@xmath0 fall of ratio with q@xmath0 indicates virtual photon pdf evolves with photon virtualitylepto 6.5.1 @xcite curve prediction leading processes dis ratio non - zero lepto contains higher - order processes parton - showering hadronization data approach direct limit resolved processes required q@xmath0 = 4.5 gev@xmath0 | 0.257723 | 1,352 | 679 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,493 | we study the topology of the publicly available data released by the 2 degree field galaxy redshift survey team ( 2dfgrs ) .
the 2dfgrs data contains over 100,000 galaxy redshifts with a magnitude limit of b@xmath0=19.45 and is the largest such survey to date .
the data lie over a wide range of right ascension ( 75@xmath1 strips ) but only within a narrow range of declination ( 10@xmath1 and 15@xmath1 strips ) .
this allows measurements of the two - dimensional genus to be made .
we find the genus curves of the ngp and sgp are slightly different .
the ngp displays a slight meatball shift topology , whereas the sgp displays a bubble like topology .
the current sgp data also have a slightly higher genus amplitude . in both cases , a slight excess of overdense regions
are found over underdense regions .
we assess the significance of these features using mock catalogs drawn from the virgo consortium s hubble volume @xmath2cdm @xmath3=0 simulation .
we find that differences between the ngp and sgp genus curves are only significant at the 1@xmath4 level .
the average genus curve of the 2dfgrs agrees well with that extracted from the @xmath2cdm mock catalogs .
we also use the simulations to assess how the current incompleteness of the survey ( the strips are not completely filled in ) affects the measurement of the genus and find that we are not sensitive to the geometry ; there are enough data in the current sample to trace the isolated high and low density regions .
we compare the amplitude of the 2dfgrs genus curve to the amplitude of a gaussian random field with the same power spectrum as the 2dfgrs and find , contradictory to results for the 3d genus of other samples , that the amplitude of the grf genus curve is slightly lower than that of the 2dfgrs .
this could be due to a a feature in the current data set or the 2d genus may not be as sensitive as the 3d genus to non - linear clustering due to the averaging over the thickness of the slice in 2d . | matching the large scale structure of the universe remains one of the most important constraints for models of structure formation .
models have been primarily compared to observations using statistics such as the correlation function , power spectrum and counts - in - cells .
these two - point statistics have shown that galaxies are indeed clustered and have allowed us to reject models , such as the standard cold dark matter model ( scdm ) with @xmath5 , as it does not have enough power on large scales .
similar constraints from the cosmic microwave background measurements , supernova ia experiments , large scale structure and clusters ( see bahcall et al .
1999 for a recent review ) have led to the development of a consensus flat cosmological constant - dominated cdm model .
all currently examined cdm models begin with gaussian random phase initial conditions .
inflation predicts that the seeds for structure formation should derive from a gaussian random phase distribution ( bardeen , steinhardt & turner 1983 ) .
this can be tested using topological statistics such as the genus statistic ( gott et al .
the topology of the large scale structure is invariant during the linear growth of structure , thus , after appropriate smoothing on large scales , the topology of the present galaxy distribution can be related to that of the initial density field .
this allows a test of the random phase hypothesis as any deviation of the measured topology might be evidence for non - gaussian initial conditions . on
relatively smaller scales , the topology of the smoothed galaxy density quantifies the degree of non - linear evolution and/or biasing of galaxy formation with respect to the mass density at the present epoch .
the genus statistic has been measured from many different galaxy redshift surveys .
gott et al .
( 1989 ) applied the 3d genus statistic to small samples of galaxies .
it has since been applied to subsequently larger surveys ; the 3d genus of the ssrs was measured by park , gott & da costa ( 1992 ) , moore et al .
( 1992 ) applied it to the qdot survey , rhoads et al .
( 1994 ) analyzed abell clusters , vogeley et al .
( 1994 ) analyzed the cfa survey and canavezes et al .
( 1998 ) analyzed the pscz survey . in 2d , the method has been applied to the cfa survey ( park et al .
1993 ) and the lcrs survey ( colley 1997 ) .
the 2d genus of the microwave background has also been measured ( colley , gott & park 1996 ) .
these papers have all concluded that the genus curve obtained was consistent with the universe having gaussian initial conditions but in some cases , results were limited by the size of the surveys .
some evidence for departure from gaussianity was found as a result of non - linear gravitational evolution and/or biasing of galaxies as compared to the mass . in this paper
, we estimate the genus of the largest galaxy redshift survey that is publicly available , the 2 degree field galaxy redshift survey ( 2dfgrs ) . in section [ sec : survey ] we describe the survey in more detail . in section [ sec : genus ]
we describe the genus statistic and in section [ sec : res ] we present our results .
we draw conclusions in section [ sec : conc ] .
the 2dfgrs is an optical spectroscopic survey of objects brighter than b@xmath0=19.45 selected from the apm galaxy survey ( maddox et al .
1990a , b ) .
the 2dfgrs survey is divided into two main regions , with additional random fields observed to improve the angular coverage for statistics such as the power spectrum . for this analysis
we do not use the random fields .
the two areas of interest are the south galactic pole ( sgp ) region , which covers the region @xmath6 , @xmath7 and a region which is close to the north galactic pole ( ngp ) , @xmath8 , @xmath9 . the data that we analyze are from the public release that was distributed to the community in june 2001 ( colless et al . 2001 and references therein ) .
102,426 galaxy redshifts were contained in the data release , making this the largest redshift survey that is publicly available .
as the survey is not finished , the angular selection function is complicated . to match this
when we construct random catalogs , required when estimating the genus , we use the software developed by the 2dfgrs team and distributed as part of the data release . for any given coordinates ( @xmath10 ) , the expected probability of a galaxy being contained in the 2dfgrs survey region is returned .
we construct a volume - limited sample from the 2dfgrs in order to obtain a radial selection function that is uniform , thus the only variation in the space density of galaxies with radial distance is due to clustering .
this means no weighting scheme is required when constructing the density field but it does restricts the number of objects in a volume - limited sample extracted from this data .
we select a volume limit of @xmath11=0.138 .
this value maintains the maximum number of galaxies in the sample .
we adopt the global @xmath12-correction + evolution correction found for b@xmath0 selected galaxies in the eso slice project ( zucca et al .
1997 ) and adopted by the 2dfgrs team ( norberg et al . 2001 ) and use @xmath13 following the 2dfgrs team and to maintain consistency with the simulation we will describe in section [ sec : res ] , we adopt a @xmath14 cosmology when converting redshift into comoving distances .
for this cosmology , the redshift limit of @xmath11=0.138 corresponds to a comoving distance of 398@xmath15mpc . [ cols="^,^ " , ] as a final comparison , we compare the genus of the 2dfgrs with the genus of a gaussian random field ( grf ) that has the same power spectrum as the 2dfgrs .
the power spectrum of the 2dfgrs has been measured by percival et al .
( 2001 ) but is only presented in a form where it is divided by a linear theory power spectrum with values of @xmath16 with @xmath17=1 and @xmath18=1 .
we use cmbfast to construct such a power spectrum , assuming that @xmath19=0.7 and that @xmath20=1 .
we multiply the points presented in percival et al . to obtain an estimate of the 2dfgrs power spectrum .
we also measure the power spectrum from the two ngp and sgp volume - limited samples we have constructed here to check consistency and find that the three power spectra have approximately the same shape . on scales larger than 10@xmath15mpc and up to 400@xmath15mpc , the 2dfgrs p(k ) is fairly similar in shape to the cmbfast power spectrum . to test
how sensitive the genus curve is to the exact features in the power spectrum curve , we compare the genus curves we obtain using a power law with p@xmath21 , the cmbfast power spectrum and the estimate of the 2dfgrs power spectrum we obtain here and find little difference between the cmbfast and 2dfgrs genus curves and only small differences between these genus estimates and ones created with the power law input .
we construct the grf on a 256@xmath22 array by assigning values to the real and imaginary parts of each fourier mode which are gaussian deviates .
we then imprint the shape of the ngp and sgp regions onto the grid before we smooth the density field and calculate the genus , exactly as described above .
we compare the genus of the 2dfgrs with that of a grf with the same power spectrum to see if the non - linear clustering that appears in the data and in the simulations affects the amplitude of the 2d genus . in previous papers that examine the genus in 3d , significant
damping of the amplitude of the data genus curve has been found as compared to the genus curve of a grf .
vogeley et al .
( 1994 ) found that for smoothing scales of 6@xmath15mpc that a grf had a 2@xmath4 higher amplitude than the genus curve of the cfa survey . on larger smoothing scales
this difference was reduced and at 16@xmath15mpc , the two curves had consistent amplitude .
we find in 2d that we do not see the same damping that has previously been seen in the 3d genus .
for values of @xmath23 , the amplitude of the grf genus curve is fairly similar to that of the 2dfgrs but on positive @xmath24 scales , the amplitude is lower than the 2dfgrs . on these large scales
, the data is definitely showing an excess of overdensities , as shown earlier in figure [ fig : simcomp ] .
the best fitting gaussian curve has a comparable amplitude to the underdense part of the genus curve but a lower amplitude than the overdense part of the genus curve .
several factors could account for the apparent discrepancy between the 2 and 3d genus amplitude ratios
. it may be that our smoothing length of 10@xmath15 is close enough to the linear regime that no amplitude difference due to non - linear clustering may be seen .
note that our 10@xmath15mpc smoothing length would be @xmath25mpc if we used the smoothing length definition adopted in in older genus papers .
vogeley et al .
( 1994 ) found no effect in 3d for @xmath26mpc .
it may also be that the non - linear clustering has a smaller effect on the 2d genus , where data are projected and thereby smoothed over the width of the survey , thus making the effective smoothing length larger .
however , we repeated this analysis using a 2d smoothing length of only 5@xmath15mpc and found similar results . because an excess of clusters may reflect biasing of the galaxies with respect to the mass distribution , it will be interesting to repeat this analysis with the final data set to examine whether the completed sample exhibits this amplitude excess in the genus curve at high density thresholds .
if these partial data in the 2dfgrs strips were slightly biased toward high density regions , perhaps because denser fields were given targeting priority over lower density regions during early observations , then the complete sample might lack such a feature .
we measure the genus from a 100,000 galaxy redshift sample of the 2dfgrs , the largest redshift sample publicly available to date . we find that the genus curves of the ngp and sgp are slightly different , with the ngp region displaying an excess of isolated clusters and the sgp region displays a slight excess of isolated voids .
these shifts are only significant at the 1@xmath4 level when we compare the genus curves to mock catalogs drawn from a @xmath2cdm simulation .
the results are qualitatively the same for two choices of the smoothing length .
we average the ngp and sgp data and find that the average genus curve is consistent with the @xmath2cdm simulation .
we find that the average 2dfgrs genus curve reveals a smaller number of isolated voids than clusters in the survey , although the points in the genus curve that show this slight excess of clusters are highly correlated .
we demonstrate that in spite of the current incompleteness in the geometry , the genus can be accurately recovered .
no bias is introduced into the shape of the genus curve by the current angular coverage .
we compare the 2dfgrs genus curve with that for a grf with the same power spectrum .
we do not find any significant amplitude depression in the amplitude of the 2dfgrs genus curve due to non - linear clustering .
this may be due to the large smoothing length , may be a feature of the 2d genus , or may indicate a real excess in the number of isolated clusters in the the 2dfgrs that is not predicted directly from the power spectrum alone .
colley ( 1997 ) found that the 2d genus of the las campanas redshift survey agrees well with a gaussian random field . a larger sample of galaxies will reveal whether there really is an excess of over dense regions , or whether this is a feature of the observing strategy applied so far .
msv acknowledges support from nsf grant ast-0071201 and the john templeton foundation .
jrg acknowledges the support from nsf grant ast-9900772 .
we thank david weinberg for providing the contour2d code .
we also thank the 2dfgrs team for their tremendous efforts in obtaining and releasing this data set and for providing the related analysis tools . | matching large scale structure universe important for models structure formation models compared to observations using statistics correlation function power spectrum counts - in - cells statistics shown galaxies clustered models standard cold dark matter model enough power on large scales constraints from cosmic microwave measurements supernova experiments large scale structure clusters bahcall et 1999 led to development consensus flat cosmological constant - dominated cdm model cdm models begin with gaussian random phase initial conditions predicts seeds for structure formation from gaussian random phase distribution tested using topological statistics genus statistic topology large scale structure invariant during linear growth after smoothing topology present galaxy distribution can related to initial density field allows test random phase hypothesis deviation topology might evidence for non - gaussian initial conditions on smaller scales topology smoothed galaxy density quantifies non - linear evolution biasing of galaxy formation mass density present epoch genus statistic measured from galaxy redshift surveys gott applied to small samples galaxies applied to larger surveys 3d genus measured by park gott da costa moore to qdot survey rhoads1994 analyzed abell clusters vogeley cfa survey canavezes 1998 pscz survey 2d method applied to cfa survey park et 1993 lcrs survey colley 1997 ) 2d genus microwave background measured colley gott park 1996 ) papers concluded genus curve consistent with universe gaussian initial conditions results limited by size surveys evidence for departure from gaussianity found non - linear gravitational evolution biasing of galaxies estimate genus of largest galaxy redshift survey 2 degree field galaxy redshift survey ( 2dfgrs ) section survey describe survey genus genus statistic present results draw conclusions 2dfgrs optical spectroscopic survey of objects brighter than b@xmath0=19.45 from apm galaxy survey maddox et al . 1990a b ) survey divided into two regions additional random fields improve angular coverage for statistics power spectrum not use random fields areas interest south galactic pole sgp ) region region @xmath6 , @xmath7 region close to north galactic pole @xmath8 @xmath9 data from public release june 2001 colless et al . 2001102,426 galaxy redshifts in data release largest redshift survey available survey not finished angular selection function complicated random catalogs genus use software by 2dfgrs team for coordinates ( @xmath10 expected probability of galaxy in 2dfgrs survey region returned construct volume - limited sample from 2dfgrs radial selection function uniform variation in space density of galaxies radial distance due to clustering no weighting scheme required density field restricts number of objects in volume - limited sample select volume limit of @xmath11=0.138 maintains maximum number of galaxies in sample adopt global @xmath12-correction + evolution correction for galaxies in project adopted by 2dfgrs use @xmath13 following 2dfgrs team consistency simulation adopt @xmath14 cosmology converting redshift into comoving distances redshift limit of @xmath11=0.138 corresponds to comoving distance of 398@xmath15mpc compare genus 2dfgrs with genus gaussian random field ( ) same power spectrum as power spectrum measured by percival et al .2001 ) presented divided by linear theory power spectrum values @xmath16 @xmath17=1 @xmath18=1 use cmbfast construct power spectrum assuming @xmath19=0.7 @xmath20=1 multiply points percival et al . estimate 2dfgrs power spectrum measure power spectrum from ngp sgp volume - samples same shape scales larger than 10@xmath15mpc to 400@xmath15mpc 2dfgrs p(k ) similar to cmbfast power spectrum test genus curve power spectrum compare genus curves power law p@xmath21 cmbfast spectrum estimate 2dfgrs spectrum little difference between cmbfast 2dfgrs genus curves small differences between estimates power law input construct grf on 256@xmath22 array values to real imaginary parts each fourier mode gaussian deviates imprint shape of ngp sgp regions onto grid before smooth density field calculate genus compare genus 2dfgrs with grf same power spectrum non - linear clustering affects amplitude 2d genus previous papers significant damping of amplitude data genus curve found compared to curve grf vogeley et al .1994 ) found smoothing scales 6@xmath15mpc grf had 2@xmath4 higher amplitude than genus curve cfa survey larger scales difference reduced 16@xmath15mpc two curves consistent amplitude 2d same damping 3d genus values @xmath23 amplitude grf genus curve similar to 2dfgrs positive @xmath24 scales amplitude lower 2dfgrs large scales data excess overdensities shown figure best fitting gaussian curve comparable amplitude underdense lower overdense factors account discrepancy 2 3d genus amplitude ratios smoothing length 10@xmath15 close to linear regime no amplitude difference due non - linear clustering 10@xmath15mpc smoothing length would @xmath25mpc older genus papers vogeley et al. 1994 ) found no effect in 3d for @xmath26mpc non - linear clustering smaller effect on 2d genus data over width survey effective smoothing length larger repeated analysis 2d smoothing length 5@xmath15mpc found similar results excess of clusters may reflect biasing galaxies mass distribution repeat analysis final data set examine sample amplitude excess genus curve at high density thresholdspartial data in 2dfgrs strips biased toward high density regions complete sample might lack feature measure genus from 100,000 galaxy redshift sample largest genus curves of ngp and sgp slightly different ngp excess of isolated clusters sgp slight excess of voids shifts significant at 1@xmath4 level genus curves to mock catalogs @xmath2cdm simulation results same for two choices smoothing length average ngp and sgp data average genus curve consistent with @xmath2cdm simulation average 2dfgrs genus curve smaller number isolated voids than clusters survey points excess correlated incompleteness geometry genus can be accurately recovered no bias introduced genus curve by current angular coverage compare 2dfgrs genus curve with grf same power spectrum significant amplitude depression in 2dfgrs genus curve due to non - linear clustering may be due to large smoothing length feature 2d genus real excess in clusters not predicted from power spectrum colley 1997 found 2d genus of las campanas redshift survey agrees with gaussian random fieldlarger sample galaxies reveal excess dense regions or feature observing strategy msv support nsf grant ast-0071201 john templeton foundation jrg support nsf grant ast-9900772 thank david weinberg contour2d code thank 2dfgrs team efforts obtaining releasing data set related analysis tools | 0.435032 | 2,760 | 1,410 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,499 | we report the temperature dependence of the low - temperature specific heat down to 400 mk of the electron - doped ba(fe@xmath0co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 superconductors . we have measured two samples extracted from the same batch :
first sample has been measured just after preparation with no additional heat treatment .
the sample shows @xmath3=20 k , residual specific heat @xmath4=3.6 mj / mol k@xmath5 and a schottky - like contribution at low temperatures .
a second sample has been annealed at 800 @xmath6 for two weeks and shows @xmath3=25 k and @xmath4=1.4 mj / mol k@xmath5 . by subtracting the lattice specific heat , from pure bafe@xmath2as@xmath2 ,
the temperature dependence of the electronic specific heat has been obtained and studied .
for both samples the temperature dependence of @xmath7 clearly indicate the presence of low - energy excitations in the system .
their specific heat data can not be described by single clean @xmath8- or @xmath9-wave models and the data requires an anisotropic gap scenario which may or may not have nodes . | the discovery of superconductivity in feas - based materials@xcite has re - opened new interest in superconductivity research . unfortunately , despite a large theoretical@xcite and experimental@xcite effort the nature of the superconductivity in these materials including the pairing mechanism and the symmetry of the order parameter remains unclear . one way to address the nature of the superconductivity is to study the low - temperature heat capacity .
the measurements of the temperature dependence of the specific heat and its magnetic filed response in superconducting state give an important information about the symmetry of the order parameter@xcite .
for optimally co doped material@xcite such a analysis suggest the presence of an anisotropic gap structure which may or may not have nodes ( see ref.@xcite ) .
moreover , the specific heat displays significant residual specific heat possibly coming from the non - superconducting fraction that is present in the system@xcite .
thus , the heat capacity at very low temperatures is very sensitive on the quality of the crystals studied and it is very often dominated by a schottky - like contribution@xcite .
this could make the the gap structure analysis quite complex . in this paper , we present results of our specific heat studies of optimally doped ba(fe@xmath0co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 samples .
we have measured two samples extracted from the same batch : sample one has been measured just after growing and without any additional heat treatment .
the sample shows @xmath3=20 k , residual specific heat @xmath4=3.6 mj / mol k@xmath5 and a schottky - like contribution at low temperatures .
sample two has been annealed at 800 @xmath6 for two weeks with @xmath3=25 k and @xmath4=1.4 mj / mol k@xmath5 . for this material
no schottky term is observed ( see fig.1 inset ) . then using similar approach as previously reported in ref.@xcite we extract and study the full electronic @xmath10-dependence for these two samples .
single crystals were grown out of feas flux with a typical size of about 2@xmath111.5@xmath110.2 mm@xmath12@xcite .
they crystalize in well - formed plates with the [ 001 ] direction perpendicular to the plane of the crystals .
the doping level was determined by microprobe analysis . after synthesis
a second piece of the sample was annealed for two weeks at 800 @xmath6 while the first one has not been heat treated .
the heat capacity was measured down to 400 mk using a thermal relaxation method implemented in a quantum design ppms-9 device .
co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 samples . circles : annealed sample with @xmath3 = 25 k. squares : non - annealed sample with @xmath3 = 20 k. the solid line describes the normal state specific heat ( see text ) .
inset : low - temperature specific heat of these two materials.,scaledwidth=58.0% ] fig.1 shows the temperature dependence of the specific heat of the annealed and non - annealed ba(fe@xmath0co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 samples . as may be seen the annealing process has increased @xmath3 quite remarkably from 20 k for the non - annealed sample up to 25 k for the annealed one . it is worth noting the transition temperature of about 25 k is one of the highest reported within the co doped ba122 family .
above @xmath3 the @xmath13 curves indicate very similar temperature dependence of the phonon part in these two materials as expected .
as may be seen from the inset of fig.1 the annealing strongly suppress the residual specific heat @xmath4 from 3.6 to 1.4 mj / mol k@xmath5 respectively for the non - annealed and annealed sample .
moreover , no schottky - like anomaly is observed for the annealed sample .
the considerably increase of @xmath3 , decrease of @xmath4 and lack of schottky - type contribution at low temperature indicate significant improvement of the quality of the single crystals after the heat treatment . in order to obtain the electronic part of the specific heat
, we have used the same approach used previously for the optimal and doped ba(fe@xmath14co@xmath15)@xmath2as@xmath2 samples ( see ref.@xcite ) .
we have assumed that the phonon contribution of the specific heat is independent of doping and we use the lattice specific heat obtained from the parent compound .
we separate the lattice contribution to the specific heat of the pure ba122 compound as @xmath16 = @xmath17 - @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the t@xmath200 intercept of @xmath21 of bafe@xmath2as@xmath2 as shown by a solid line in fig.1 .
so , the electronic specific heat is simply determined by @xmath22 .
the obtained normal state @xmath23 from above @xmath3 provide perfect entropy balance for the electronic specific heat in the superconducting state below @xmath3 for both , non - annealed@xcite and annealed samples . co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 samples .
solid and dashed lines are fits of the bcs @xmath24-model ( see text ) .
inset : normalized temperature dependence of the superconducting part of the specific heat.,scaledwidth=58.0% ] fig.2 shows the electronic part of the specific heat of ba(fe@xmath14co@xmath15)@xmath2as@xmath2 samples . for the non - annealed sample a small schottky contribution below 1 k has also been subtracted .
for both samples pronounced peaks are observed at the transition temperature . for the annealed sample
the specific heat exhibits a jump @xmath25 = 33.6 mj / mol k@xmath5 at @xmath3 .
taking @xmath26 = 22 mj / mol k@xmath5 the ratio @xmath27 = 1.53 is slightly larger then the weak - coupling bcs value 1.43 .
it is also larger then @xmath27 = 1.34 obtained for the non - annealed sample@xcite . below @xmath3
the @xmath28 data in fig.2 were analyzed by the bcs @xmath24-model : @xmath29\ ] ] where @xmath30 , @xmath31 is the fermi function @xmath32 , @xmath33 and @xmath34 ( see ref.@xcite ) plus residual normal state component .
as has been shown before a single @xmath8-wave gap scenario can not describe the specific heat data in co - doped ba122 material@xcite .
it clearly indicates the presence of an anisotropic gap structure in this material .
moreover , the specific heat data of optimally doped ba122 can not be accounted by using a clean d - wave gap aproach either@xcite . in order to sufficiently describe
the specific heat data of annealed ba(fe@xmath0co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 two separate @xmath8-wave gaps ( solid line ) have been used as shown in fig.2 .
this parametrization is not unique but provides a reasonable estimate of the dominant energy scales in the gap structure .
it gives parameters : @xmath35 = 1.83 mev , @xmath36 = 4.76 mev and @xmath37 = 0.72 .
the values of the gap are larger then the ones observed in non - annealed materials@xcite @xmath35 = 1.65 mev , @xmath36 = 3.75 mev and @xmath37 = 0.62 ( see dashed line in fig.2 ) .
it is consistent with the lower transition temperature observed in the non - annealed materials .
inset of fig.2 presents the electronic part of the specific heat of the superconducting portion of the ba(fe@xmath0co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 samples .
it has been obtained by subtracting the residual linear term @xmath4 , together with a small schottky contribution below 1 k for the non - annealed sample , and normalized by ( @xmath26-@xmath4 ) .
interestingly , these two curves match , indicating no significant change of the gap structure in these two samples .
in summary , using the low - temperature specific heat we explore details of the superconducting state of ba(fe@xmath0co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 with @xmath3 = 25 and 20 k. by subtracting the phonon specific heat the temperature dependence of the electronic specific heat has been studied .
the temperature variation of @xmath38 as well as its field dependence ( not shown ) can not be described by a single isotropic @xmath8-wave gap , indicating the presence of an anisotropic gap structure in the system .
the temperature variation of the electronic specific heat below @xmath3 may be well described by the presence of two superconducting gaps , pointing to a complex gap structure in the system .
it has been shown recently that for optimally co - doped bafe@xmath2as@xmath2 samples a minimum of two superconducting gaps are necessary to describe the temperature dependence of the electronic specific heat@xcite . moreover , for these two optimally doped samples with different quality the details of the superconducting state do not change significantly .
it is in agreement with the lack of doping dependence in ba(fe@xmath14co@xmath15)@xmath2as@xmath2@xcite , indicating that the gap structure does not change significantly as a function of doping@xcite .
this does not address the possibility that accidental nodes may or may not to be present and could be sample , doping , and/or material dependent .
+ work at los alamos national laboratory was performed under the auspices of the u.s .
department of energy , office of science and supported in part by the los alamos ldrd program .
research at oak ridge national laboratory is sponsored by the division of material sciences and engineering office of basic energy sciences . | discovery of superconductivity in feas - based materials opened interest research despite effort nature superconductivity pairing mechanism symmetry of order parameter remains unclear low - temperature heat capacity measurements temperature dependence specific heat magnetic filed response in superconducting state give information about symmetry order parameter for optimally co doped material suggest anisotropic gap structure specific heat displays residual heat from non - superconducting fraction heat capacity at low temperatures sensitive on quality crystals often dominated by schottky - like contribution gap structure analysis complex present results of specific heat studies of optimally doped samples measured two samples batch one measured after growing without heat treatment shows @xmath3=20 k residual specific heat @xmath4=3.6 mj / mol k schottky - like contribution at low temperatures sample two annealed at 800 @xmath6 for two weeks with @xmath3=25 k @xmath4=1.4 mj / mol k no schottky term observed fig approach study full electronic @xmath10-dependence for two samplescrystals grown feas flux typical size 2@xmath111.5 mm@xmath12@xcite crystalize in plates perpendicular to plane doping level determined by microprobe analysis after synthesis second sample annealed two weeks at 800 @xmath6 first not heat treated heat capacity measured to 400 mk thermal relaxation method quantum design ppms-9 device samples circles annealed sample @xmath3 = 25 k non - annealed sample @xmath3 = 20 k solid line describes normal state specific heat inset low - temperature specific heat fig.1 shows temperature dependence heat annealed non - annealed samples annealing process increased @xmath3 from 20 k up to 25 k transition temperature 25 k highest co doped ba122 family above curves indicate similar temperature dependence phonon part annealing residual specific heat @xmath4 from 3.6 to 1.4 mj / mol k@xmath5 non - annealed annealed sample no schottky - like anomaly annealed sampleincrease @xmath3 decrease @xmath4 lack schottky contribution at low temperature indicate improvement quality crystals after heat treatment obtain electronic part specific heat used same approach for optimal doped ba samples phonon contribution specific heat independent doping use lattice specific heat from parent compound separate lattice contribution heat ba122 compound as @xmath16 = @xmath17 - @xmath18 @xmath19 t@xmath200 intercept @xmath21 electronic specific heat determined by @xmath22 normal state @xmath23 above @xmath3 provide entropy balance electronic specific heat superconducting state below @xmath3 non - annealed annealed samples lines bcs @xmath24-model normalized temperature dependence superconducting part specific heat fig.2 shows electronic part specific heat samples non - annealed sample small schottky contribution below 1 k subtracted peaks observed at transition temperature annealed sample specific heat jump @xmath25 = 33.6 mj / mol k@xmath5 at @xmath3@xmath26 = 22 mj / mol@xmath5 ratio @xmath27 = 1.53 larger weak - coupling bcs value 1.43 larger @xmath27 = 1.34 non - annealed sample @xmath3 @xmath28 data fig.2 analyzed by bcs @xmath24-model @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 fermi function @xmath32 residual normal state component single @xmath8-wave gap describe specific heat data co - doped ba122 material indicates anisotropic gap structure specific heat data optimally doped ba122 accounted clean d - wave gap annealed two @xmath8-wave gaps.2 parametrization estimate dominant energy scales gap structure parameters @xmath35 = 1.83 mev @xmath36 = 4.76 mev @xmath37 = 0.72 values gap larger non - annealed materials @xmath35 = 1.65 mev @xmath36 = 3.75 mev @xmath37 = 0.62 consistent with lower transition temperature non - annealed materials fig.2 presents electronic part specific heat superconducting portion samplesobtained subtracting residual linear term @xmath4 small schottky contribution below 1 k non - normalized by @xmath26-@xmath4 two curves match no significant change gap structure low - temperature heat superconducting state of ba(fe@xmath0co@xmath1)@xmath2as@xmath2 with @xmath3 = 25 and 20 k subtracting phonon specific heat temperature dependence electronic specific heat studied temperature variation of @xmath38 field dependence single isotropic @xmath8-wave gap anisotropic gap structure temperature variation electronic heat below @xmath3 described two superconducting gaps complex gap structure optimally co - doped bafe@xmath2as@xmath2 samples two superconducting gaps necessary temperature dependence electronic specific heat@xcite two doped samples superconducting state change significantly lack of doping dependence in ba(fe@xmath14co@xmath15)@xmath2as@xmath2@xcite gap structure change doping accidental nodes present sample doping material dependent work los alamos national laboratory performed u.s . department of energy office of science supported los alamos ldrd programoak ridge laboratory sponsored material sciences office energy sciences | 0.347155 | 2,310 | 1,124 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,502 | the contribution of the light - front valence wave function to the electromagnetic current of spin-1 composite particles is not enough to warranty the proper transformation of the current under rotations .
the naive derivation of the plus component of the current in the drell - yan - west frame within an analytical and covariant model of the vertex leads to the violation of the rotational symmetry . computing the form - factors in a quasi drell - yan - west frame @xmath0 ,
we were able to separate out in an analytical form the contributions from z - diagrams or zero modes using the instant - form cartesian polarization basis . | light - front models are useful to describe hadronic bound states , like mesons or baryons due to its particular boost properties @xcite . however , the light - front description in a truncated fock - space breaks the rotational symmetry because the associated transformation is a dynamical boost @xcite .
therefore , an analysis with covariant analytical models , can be useful to pin down the main missing features in a truncated light - front fock - space description of the composite system . in this respect , the rotational symmetry breaking of the plus component of the electromagnetic current , in the drell - yan frame ,
was recently studied within an analytical model for the spin-1 vertex of a composite two - fermion bound state @xcite .
it was shown that , if pair term contributions are ignored in the evaluation of the matrix elements of the electromagnetic current , the covariance of the form factors is lost @xcite . the complete restoration of covariance in the form factor calculation is found only when pair terms or zero modes contributions to the matrix elements of the current are considered @xcite .
the extraction of the electromagnetic form - factors of a spin-1 composite particle from the microscopic matrix elements of the plus component of the current ( @xmath1 ) in the drell - yan frame ( momentum transfer @xmath2 ) , based only on the valence component of the wave function , presents ambiguities due to the lacking of the rotational invariance of the current model @xcite . in the breit - frame with momentum transfers along the transverse direction ( the drell - yan condition is satisfied ) the current @xmath3 has four independent matrix elements , although only three form factors exist .
therefore , the matrix elements satisfies an identity , known as the angular condition @xcite , which is violated .
several extraction schemes for evaluating the form - factors were proposed , and in particular we consider the suggestion made in ref .
it was found in a numerical calculation of the @xmath4-meson electromagnetic form factors considering only the valence contribution @xcite , that the prescription proposed by @xcite to evaluate the form - factors , produced results in agreement with the covariant calculations . in ref .
@xcite , it was used an analytical form of the @xmath4-quark - antiquark vertex .
later , in ref .
@xcite , it was shown that the above prescription eliminates the pair diagram contributions to the form factors , using a simplified form of the model , when the matrix elements of the current were evaluated for spin-1 light - cone polarization states .
this nice result was thought to be due to the use of the particular light - cone polarization states . here
, we will show in a straightforward and analytic manner that the cancelation of the pair contribution in the evaluation of the form factors using the prescription from ref .
@xcite also happens for the instant form polarization states in the cartesian representation , generalizing the previous conclusion @xcite .
our aim , is to expose in a simple and detailed form , how the pair terms appear in the matrix elements of the current evaluated between instant form polarization states , and their cancelation in the form factors using the correct prescription .
therefore , we conclude that this property is more general than realized before .
but , in the case of spin-0 composite particles ( like the pion ) with the correspondent form of the analytical model , the plus component of the electromagnetic current in the breit - frame , with @xmath5 , does not have contributions from pair terms @xcite .
the electromagnetic current has the following general form for spin-1 particles @xcite : @xmath6 ( p^\mu + p^{\prime \mu } ) - f_3(q^2 ) ( q_\alpha g_\beta^\mu- q_\beta g_\alpha^\mu ) \ , \label{eq : curr1}\ ] ] where @xmath7 is the mass of the vector particle , @xmath8 is the momentum transfer , @xmath9 and @xmath10 is on - shell initial and final momentum respectively . from the covariant form factors @xmath11 ,
@xmath12 and @xmath13 , one can obtain the charge ( @xmath14 ) , magnetic ( @xmath15 ) and quadrupole ( @xmath16 ) form factors ( see e.g. @xcite ) .
the matrix elements of the electromagnetic current @xmath17 in the impulse approximation are written as @xcite : @xmath18 \lambda(k , p_f)\lambda(k , p_i ) } { ( k^2 - m^2+\imath \epsilon ) ( ( k - p_i)^2 - m^2+\imath\epsilon ) ( ( k - p_f)^2 - m^2+\imath \epsilon ) } \ ] ] where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the polarization four - vectors of the final and initial states , respectively and @xmath21 is the quark mass .
the electromagnetic form - factors are calculated in the breit frame with the drell - yan - west condition , which gives the momentum transfer @xmath22 , the particle initial momentum @xmath23 and the the final one @xmath24 .
we use @xmath25 and @xmath26 .
the polarization four - vectors in instant - form basis are given by @xmath27 for the initial state and by , @xmath28 for the final state .
the regularization function @xmath29 is enough to render finite the photo - absorption amplitude ; the regularization parameter is @xmath30 .
the vertex function @xmath31 for the vector particles utilized ( see ref .
@xcite for details ) is given below : @xmath32 the vector particle is on - mass shell ; @xmath7 is the vector bound state mass , and its four momentum @xmath33 .
after the integration in the light - front energy ( @xmath34 ) , the light - front wave function is writing like : @xmath35 \ .
\label{eq : npwf}\ ] ] the extraction of the electromagnetic form factor with the plus component of the electromagnetic current and the angular condition are discussed next section .
the matrix elements of the electromagnetic current expressed in terms of the current in the instant form spin basis , after the use of the melosh rotation @xcite is : @xmath36 here the matrix elements of the electromagnetic current are calculated with the plus component of the current ,
@xmath37 and the light - front polarizatiion states denoted as @xmath38 . in the breit - frame ( @xmath5 ) , the angular condition is translated by the equation @xcite : @xmath39 in the case of the instant form spin basis , the angular condition is @xmath40 @xcite .
the prescription adopted by grach and kondratyuk @xcite eliminate the matrix elements @xmath41 in order to compute the electromagnetic form factors for spin-1 particles .
the terms of the trace calculated with only the @xmath42 structure of the vertex , of the eq.([rhov ] ) , is writing below : @xmath43_{ji}= tr\left [ \sla{\epsilon}_j^{\alpha } ( \sla{k}-\sla{p}^{\prime } + m ) \gamma^+ ( \sla{k } - \sla{p } + m ) \sla{\epsilon}_i^{\alpha } ( \sla{k } + m ) \right ] \ . \label{trgaga}\ ] ] the trace is calculated with the light - front coordinates , ( @xmath44 ) and the @xmath45 dependence is separate , ( in the eq.([trgaga ] ) ) , then , we get the results below : @xmath43_{ji}^{+z } = \frac{k^-}{2 } tr\left [ \sla{\epsilon}_j^{\alpha } ( \sla{k}-\sla{p}^{\prime } + m ) \gamma^+ ( \sla{k } - \sla{p } + m ) \sla{\epsilon}_i^{\alpha } \gamma^+ \right ] \ .\ ] ] for the polarization four - vectors @xmath46 , the traces above are given by : @xmath47^{+z}_{xx } & = & - k^- \frac{\eta}{8 } r_{gg } \ , \
_ { yy}^{+z } = \ 4 k^- ( p^+ -k^+)^2 \ , \nonumber \\ tr[gg]_{zz}^{+z } & = & \frac18 ~k^- ~r_{gg } \ , \
tr[gg]^{+z}_{zx } = - k^- \frac { \sqrt{\eta } } { 8 } r_{gg } \label{traces } \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath48 \label{badtrace } \ .
$ ] the trace equation , eq.([traces ] ) , yield the following relations : @xmath49^{+z}_{xx } & = & -\eta tr [ gg ] _ { zz}^{+z } ~ , \nonumber \\ tr [ gg ] ^{+z}_{zx } & = & -\sqrt{\eta}~tr [ gg ] ^{+z}_{zz } \ . \label{trrelations}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the zero - modes contributions for the direct term coupling given by : @xmath50 = \lim_{\delta^+ \rightarrow 0_+}\;\sum_{r=4,5\ ; ; \;s=4,6 } \int [ d^4 k]^{+z } \frac { tr[gg ] ^{+z}_{ji } } { [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ r ] ^2 [ s ] ^2 } \ , \label{currimgg}\ ] ] where @xmath51^z=[d^4 k]~\theta(p^{\prime+}-k^+ ) \theta(k^+-p^{+})$ ] , and the denominators are given by : @xmath52 = [ k^2-m^2+\imath\epsilon]$ ] , @xmath53 = [ ( k - p)^2-m^2 + \imath \epsilon]$ ] , @xmath54 = [ ( k - p^{\prime } ) ^2 - m^2 + \imath \epsilon]$ ] , @xmath55 = [ ( k - p)^2-m_r^2 + \imath \epsilon]$ ] , @xmath56 = [ ( k - p^{\prime } ) ^2 - m_r^2 + \imath \epsilon]$ ] , @xmath57 = [ k^2- m_r^2 + \imath \epsilon]$ ] and @xmath58 . the integration of the eq.([currimgg ] ) is performed with the _ pole dislocation method _ , developed in the reference @xcite , after that , the contribution of the _ zero modes _ for the matrix element @xmath59 of the electromagnetic current is zero and the matrix element @xmath60 of the electromagnetic current not have a pair term contribuition . using the prescription of the ref.@xcite
, the electromagnetic form factors for spin-1 particles are writing with matrix elements of the electromagnetic current in instant form spin basis as : @xmath61 here the _
superscripts gk _ in the equation above is the initials for the authors of the ref .
@xcite , grach , i. and kondratyuk , l. a. considering the relations in eq.([trrelations ] ) , the prescription given by grach @xcite , cancel out the zero - modes contribution to the electromagnetic form factors for this part of the vertex function ( see the figures 1 and 2 ) . then the angular condition in the cartesian spin basis with the zero - modes contribuition is @xcite : @xmath62 because the zero modes contribuition to the matrix elements @xmath59 of the electromagnetic current is zero ; the angular condition is only due to the valence components of the electromagnetic current , @xmath63 , and to the zero modes contribuition to the electromagnetic current @xmath64 .
the figures 1 and 2 show the results for the electromagnetic matrix elements of the current calculated with the instant form and the light - front approach .
after the zero - modes inclusion , the covariance are restorate .
following the ref .
@xcite we separate the structure of the vertex eq.([rhov ] ) in the valence contribuition and the zero - modes for the spin-1 particles . the prescription sugested by the ref .
@xcite utilized in the calculation of the electromagnetic form factor for spin-1 particles cancel out the zero - modes contribuition to the matrix elements for the electromagnetic current ; then the electromagnetic form factors for spin-1 calculated with the _ grach _ and _ kondratyuk _
@xcite are free of the non - valence contribuition and only the valence part of the electromagnetic current contributed to the electromagnetic form factors .
it is possible to generalize the conclusion found here for the full electromagnetic matrix elements of the spin-1 particles with the vertex function , eq.([rhov ] ) ; i.e , the zero - modes not contributed to the electromagnetic form factors if the prescription of the ref.@xcite it is adopted .
this work was supported in part by the brazilian agencies fapesp ( fundao de amparo pesquisa do estado de so paulo ) and cnpq ( conselho nacional de desenvolvimento cientfico e tecnolgico ) .
j. p. b. c. de melo thanks the organizer of the light - cone 2011 for the invitation .
i.l.grach , l.a .
kondratyuk , and m.strikman : _ is the structure in the deuteron magnetic form - factor at @xmath65 approximately = @xmath66 a new evidence for nuclear core?_. phys .
* 62 * , 387 ( 1989 )
. j. .p .
b. c. de melo , t. frederico , e. pace , and g. salm : frame dependence of the pair contribution to the pion electromagnetic form - factor in a light front approach .
jour . of phys . * 33 * , 301 ( 2003 ) .
frankfurt and m. strikman : _ relativistic description of the deuteron : elastic and inelastic form - factors in the region kinematically forbidden for scattering on a free nucleon .
b*148 * , 107 ( 1979 ) . | light - front models describe hadronic bound states like mesons baryons due boost properties light - front description truncated fock - space breaks rotational symmetry transformation dynamical boost analysis with covariant models pin missing features in truncated light - front description composite system rotational symmetry breaking plus component electromagnetic current in drell - yan frame studied model for spin-1 vertex composite two - fermion bound state if pair term contributions ignored covariance form factors lost complete restoration covariance found when pair terms or zero modes contributions considered extraction of electromagnetic form - factors spin-1 composite particle from microscopic matrix elements plus in drell - yan frame based on valence component wave function presents ambiguities due to lacking rotational invariance current model in breit - frame with momentum transfers transverse direction drell - condition satisfied current @xmath3 has four independent matrix elements three form factors exist matrix elements angular condition violated several extraction schemes for evaluating form - factors proposed suggestion ref found numerical calculation @xmath4-meson electromagnetic form factors considering valence contribution @xcite prescription proposed produced results with covariant calculations ref @xcite used analytical form @xmath4-quark - antiquark vertex shown prescription eliminates pair diagram contributions to form factors simplified form model matrix elements current evaluated for spin-1 light - cone polarization states result due to use light - cone polarization states show cancelation of pair contribution in evaluation form factors prescription happens for instant form polarization states cartesian representation generalizing previous conclusion aim expose pair terms appear in matrix elements current between instant form polarization states cancelation form factors using correct prescription conclude property more general than realized case spin-0 composite particles pion correspondent form analytical model plus component electromagnetic current in breit - frame @xmath5 contributions from pair terms @xciteelectromagnetic current form spin-1 particles @xcite : @xmath6 p^\mu + p\prime \mu - f_3(q^2 ) q\alpha g_\beta^\mu- q\beta\alpha^\mu @xmath7 mass vector particle @xmath8 momentum transfer @xmath9 @xmath10 initial final momentum covariant form factors @xmath11 charge @xmath14 magnetic @xmath15 quadrupole @xmath16 ) form factors matrix elements electromagnetic current @xmath17 written @xcite : @xmath18 \lambda(k p_f)\lambda(k p_i ) k^2 - m^2+\imath \epsilon^2 - @xmath19 @xmath20 polarization four - vectors final initial states @xmath21 quark mass electromagnetic form - factors calculated breit frame drell - yan - west condition momentum transfer @xmath22 particle initial momentum @xmath23 final @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 polarization four - vectors @xmath27 initial state @xmath28 final stateregularization function @xmath29 photo - absorption amplitude regularization parameter @xmath30 vertex function @xmath31 vector particles @xmath32 vector particle on - mass shell @xmath7 vector bound state mass four momentum @xmath33 integration light - front energy @xmath34 light - front wave function @xmath35 extraction electromagnetic form factor plus component angular condition discussed next matrix elements electromagnetic current instant form spin basis melosh rotation @xcite @xmath36 calculated with plus component current @xmath37 light - front polarizatiion @xmath38 breit - frame @xmath5 angular condition translated by equation @xcite : @xmath39 instant form spin basis angular condition @xmath40 @xcite prescription grach kondratyuk matrix elements @xmath41 compute electromagnetic form factors for spin-1 particles terms trace calculated with @xmath42 structure vertex eq.[rhov @xmath43}\sla{\epsilon}\alpha \sla{k-\sla{p\prime + m \gamma^+ \sla{k \sla{p + m \sla{\epsilon}{\alpha \sla{k + m{trgaga} trace calculated light - front coordinates @xmath44 @xmath45 dependence separate results @xmath43_{ji}{+z } \frac{k^-}{2 } \sla{\epsilon}{\alpha } \sla{k}-\sla{p}\prime } + m\gamma^+\sla{k - \sla{p } + m \sla{\epsilon}{\alpha }\gamma^+polarization four - vectors @xmath46 traces @xmath47^{+z}_{xx k^-\frac{\eta}{8 } r_{gg yy}^{+z } 4 k^- p^+ -k^+)^2 \nonumber tr[gg]_{zz}^{+z\frac18 ~k^- ~r_{gg tr[gg]^{+z}_{zx k^- \sqrt{\eta } { 8 r_{gg\label{traces }{aligned @xmath48 \label{badtrace } trace equation relations @xmath49^{+z}_{xx } -\eta zz}^{+z }\nonumber tr ^{+z}_{zx } -\sqrt{\eta}~tr ^{+z}_{zz{trrelations{aligned zero - modes contributions direct term coupling @xmath50 =\delta+ 0+{r=4,5=4,6 d^4 k^{+z tr[gg ^{+z 1 2 3 r ^2 s{currimgg @xmath51^z=[d^4 k\theta(p\prime+-k^+ \theta(k^+-p^{+) denominators @xmath52 = k^2-m^2+\imath\epsilon @xmath53 = k - p)^2-m^2 + \imath\epsilon @xmath54 k - p ^2 - m^2 + \imath\epsilon @xmath55 k - p)^2-m_r^2 + \imath \epsilon @xmath56 k - p^{ ^2 - m_r^2 + \imath \epsilon @xmath57 = k^2- m_r^2 + \imath \epsilon]$ @xmath58 integration eq.[currimgg pole dislocation method @xcite contribution zero modes matrix element @xmath59 electromagnetic current zero @xmath60 pair term contribuition ref.@xcite electromagnetic form factors for spin-1 particles matrix elements @xmath61 superscripts gk initials for authors @xcite grach kondratyuk relations prescription by grach @xcite zero - modes contribution electromagnetic form factors vertex function figures 1 2 angular condition cartesian spin with zero - modes contribuition is @xcite : @xmath62 zero modes contribuition to matrix elements @xmath59 electromagnetic current zero angular condition due to valence components current @xmath63 zero modes contribuition current @xmath64 figures 1 2 show results for electromagnetic matrix elements calculated with instant form light - front approach after zero - modes inclusion covariance @xcite separate structure vertex eq. in valence contribuition zero - modes for spin-1 particles prescription by @xcite electromagnetic form factor spin-1 particles out zero - modes contribuition matrix elements electromagnetic current form factors spin-1 calculated with grach kondratyuk @xcite free of non - valence contribuition only valence part electromagnetic current generalize conclusion for full electromagnetic matrix elements spin-1 particles with vertex functionzero - modes electromagnetic form factors if prescription ref.@xcite adopted work supported by brazilian agencies fapesp cnpq de melo thanks organizer light - cone 2011 invitation i.l.grach kondratyuk m.strikman structure deuteron magnetic form - factor @xmath65 = @xmath66 new evidence nuclear core? . 62, 387 ( 1989 ) de melo frederico pace g. salm dependence pair contribution pion electromagnetic form - factor light front approach phys . 33, 301 ( 2003 ) frankfurt m relativistic description deuteron elastic inelastic form - factors region kinematically forbidden scattering free nucleon b*148, 107 ( 1979 ) | 0.559855 | 3,190 | 1,660 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,504 | hadronic reactions producing strange quarks such as the exclusive @xmath0 and @xmath1 reactions , or the semi - inclusive @xmath2 reaction , play an important role in studies of hadron structure and the dynamics that bind the most basic elements of nuclear physics .
the small - angle capability of the new super high momentum spectrometer ( shms ) in hall c , coupled with its high momentum reach - up to the anticipated 11-gev beam energy in hall c - and coincidence capability with the well - understood high momentum spectrometer ( hms ) , will allow for probes of such hadron structure involving strangeness down to the smallest distance scales to date . to cleanly select the kaons ,
a threshold aerogel cerenkov detector has been constructed for the shms .
the detector consists of an aerogel tray followed by a diffusion box .
four trays for aerogel of nominal refractive indices of @xmath3=1.030 , 1.020 , 1.015 and 1.011 were constructed .
the tray combination will allow for identification of kaons from 1 gev/@xmath4 up to 7.2 gev/@xmath4 , reaching @xmath5 proton and @xmath6 pion rejection , with kaon detection efficiency better than 95% .
the diffusion box of the detector is equipped with 14 five - inch diameter photomultiplier tubes .
its interior walls are covered with gore diffusive reflector , which is superior to the commonly used millipore paper and improved the detector performance by 35% .
the inner surface of the two aerogel trays with higher refractive index is covered with millipore paper , however , those two trays with lower aerogel refractive index are again covered with gore diffusive reflector for higher performance .
the measured mean number of photoelectrons in saturation is @xmath712 for @xmath3=1.030 , @xmath78 for @xmath3=1.020 , @xmath710 for @xmath3=1.015 , and @xmath75.5 for @xmath3=1.011 .
the design details , the results of component characterization , and initial performance tests and optimization of the detector are presented . | the 21st century holds great promise for reaching a new era for unlocking the mysteries of the inner quark - gluon structure of the atomic nucleus and the nucleons inside it as governed by the theory of strong interactions ( qcd ) . the experimental program at the upgraded 12 gev jefferson laboratory @xcite , currently nearing completion , will play an important role in this quest , and revolutionize the current understanding of the dynamics of the fundamental quarks and gluons that create the wide and varied structure of hadrons and nuclei .
hall c with its heavily - shielded detector setup in a highly - focusing magnetic spectrometer with large momentum reach will be the optimal hall for certain classes of deep exclusive and semi - inclusive measurements , and in particular those requiring high quality rosenbluth ( or longitudinal - transverse - l / t ) cross section separations .
the hall c base experimental equipment consists of two magnetic spectrometers : the high momentum spectrometer ( hms ) @xcite and the super high momentum spectrometer ( shms ) @xcite . depending on the specific requirements of the experiments , they can detect either negatively or positively charged particles by choosing the magnetic field and the trigger configuration .
the hms is designed to detect secondary products of reactions in the momentum range from 0.5 to 7.3 gev/@xmath4 , while the shms momentum range extends up to about 12 gev/@xmath4 .
both spectrometers are equipped with a pair of drift chambers , pairs of timing scintillator hodoscopes for trigger formation , and various detectors for particle identification purposes , including the aerogel erenkov detector .
a schematic of the shms detector package is shown in fig .
[ shms - hut ] .
particle identification in the shms relies on time - of - flight measurements at lower momentum , an electromagnetic pre - shower and full shower calorimeter and erenkov detectors .
a erenkov detector as filled with noble gases , and the calorimeter will be used for @xmath8 separation , while a separate erenkov detector filled with heavier gases such as c@xmath9f@xmath10o will provide @xmath11 identification above 3.4 gev/@xmath4 . to complete the necessary pid capability of the shms necessary to successfully carry out the strangeness physics part of the hall c program , the shms aerogel erenkov detector descriped in this paper was built to distinguish kaons from protons with momenta above 2.6 gev/@xmath4 .
( color online ) schematic drawings of the shms aerogel detector ( left , a ) and its placement in the shms detector hut ( right , b ) .
the detector stack of the shms consists , right to left , of a gas erenkov , a pair of drift chambers , a pair of @xmath12 segmented scintillator , a gas erenkov ( gray cylinder ) , two possible slots for the aerogel detector , each of 30 cm depth , a second @xmath12 segmented scintillator / quartz bar hodoscope , and an electromagnetic calorimeter . , title="fig:",width=153 ] ( color online ) schematic drawings of the shms aerogel detector ( left , a ) and its placement in the shms detector hut ( right , b ) .
the detector stack of the shms consists , right to left , of a gas erenkov , a pair of drift chambers , a pair of @xmath12 segmented scintillator , a gas erenkov ( gray cylinder ) , two possible slots for the aerogel detector , each of 30 cm depth , a second @xmath12 segmented scintillator / quartz bar hodoscope , and an electromagnetic calorimeter .
, title="fig:",width=153 ] meson production experiments such as the `` scaling study of the l - t separated pion electroproduction cross section at 11 gev '' ( e12 - 07 - 105 ) @xcite and `` studies of the l - t separated kaon electroproduction cross section from 5 - 11 gev '' ( e12 - 09 - 011 ) @xcite , will study the potential for 3d hadron imaging studies and may also allow for form factor extractions in a kinematic regime where the signatures of qcd are quantitatively revealed @xcite .
these experiments will provide high - quality cross section data , requiring detection of scattered mesons with momenta approaching 10 gev/@xmath4 , for which the shms in hall c is exceptionally well suited .
however , additional instrumentation for @xmath13/@xmath14 particle identification is needed for the kaon measurement , which forms an essential part of this program .
the `` @xmath15 in sidis '' experiment ( e12 - 09 - 017 ) @xcite will map the transverse momentum dependence of semi - inclusive electroproduction of charged mesons from both proton and deuteron targets . in this experiment it will be beneficial to also separate kaons from protons .
the `` measurement of @xmath16=@xmath17/@xmath18 in sidis '' ( e12 - 06 - 104 ) @xcite will study the inclusive - exclusive connection in meson electroproduction , where duality has recently been shown to be valid and will be essential in understanding flavor decomposition in semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering at 12 gev . with @xmath13/@xmath14 separation
this measurement can access the additional flavors of strange systems .
the `` pion transparency '' experiment ( e12 - 06 - 107 ) @xcite will map the transparency of the nuclear medium to pions and measure the approach to the qcd - calculable , or point - like , regime using the @xmath19 dependence of the ratio of cross sections from nucleon and nuclear targets .
kaon transparency measurements may contribute additional information to our understanding of this approach .
the general requirement for these experiments is a high detection efficiency for kaons in the shms and the capability to separate protons from kaons .
the experiments plan to run with an electron beam with energy of up to 11 gev and beam currents between a few and 80 @xmath20a hitting liquid hydrogen or deuterium target cells with lengths about 10 cm , or selected solid targets , yielding particle rates in the shms detector stack of up to 2 mhz . to take full advantage of the existing shms standard detector configuration without compromising its performance , the additional aerogel erenkov detector system was designed with the following specifications : * to have a sensitive area of at least 90@xmath2160 @xmath22 with a thickness of radiator up to 9 cm .
* to fit into a small slot of about 30 cm between the heavy gas erenkov detector and the electromagnetic calorimeter ; * to minimize the material in the particle path to keep the amount of multiple scattering and @xmath23-electrons small ; * to allow easy exchange of the aerogel material to match the required kaon momentum range ; * to provide acceptable time resolution and a high - rate capability . of the approved experiments , three ( e12 - 06 - 104 , e12 - 09 - 017 , and e12 - 07 - 105 ) only require kaon particle identification ( pid ) in the 2.7 - 5 gev/@xmath4 momentum range .
higher momenta are relevant for the kaon factorization experiment ( e12 - 09 - 011 ) , up to 7.2 gev / c , and the pion transparency measurement , where kaon identification up to this momentum would allow extraction of kaon transparencies up to @xmath24 7 ( gev/@xmath4)@xmath25 . to take into account this range of experimental requirements , covering from about 2 to above 7 gev/@xmath4 momentum , the refractive indices characteristic of aerogel material are well suited for this purpose . to maintain good @xmath26 separation over this full kinematic range
, we chose a range of aerogel materials , with nominal refractive indices of @xmath3=1.030 ( sp-30 ) , @xmath3=1.020 ( sp-20 ) , @xmath3=1.015 ( sp-15 ) , and @xmath3=1.011 ( sp-11 ) .
the threshold momenta ( in gev/@xmath4 ) for muons , pions , kaons and protons in these types of aerogel are listed in table [ tab : aerogel - thresholds ] . up to about 4 gev/@xmath4
, @xmath26 separation is achieved with aerogel with a refractive index of @xmath3=1.030 . beyond
, the lower three refractive indices provide excellent @xmath26 separation in the momentum range between 4 and @xmath77 gev/@xmath4 .
the aerogel material is characterized by a constant refractive index , and by wavelength - dependent absorption and scattering lengths , @xmath28 and @xmath29 .
the last 2 parameters were modeled in the simulation based on studies of aerogel optical properties carried out at desy @xcite . for light of wavelengths @xmath30300 nm the transmittance through the aerogel is described to good accuracy by the hunt formula @xcite which assumes constant absorption ( constant @xmath28 ) and rayleigh scattering ( @xmath31 ) . below 300 nm
@xmath28 dramatically decreases , and @xmath29 changes less rapidly .
absorption and scattering lengths of the aerogel used in the simulations include a constant absorption length for @xmath30 300 nm linearly decreasing to 1 cm at @xmath32 200 nm in accordance with ref .
@xcite . the constant value for @xmath30 300 nm was tuned using data from cosmic tests with the shms aerogel erenov detector ( see section [ cosmic_tests_detector ] ) and optimized for the optimum sensitivity of our pmts , around 450 nm .
a value of @xmath28=90 cm gives the best agreement between simulation and data for sp-30 and sp-20 aerogels .
this value is also consistent with our direct measurement of the absorption length at 450 nm as shown in fig .
[ fig : aero_spall_abscoeff ] . for the lower refractive index aerogels , which were produced by a different vendor
, a larger value seems to be more suitable , we find @xmath33220 cm .
the scale of @xmath29 is of less importance for the simulation accuracy of the detector s performance . for the purpose of the present simulations
it was derived from the average value for the hunt clarity factor @xmath34 obtained in ref .
@xcite .
reflectivity of the millipore paper for @xmath35 315 nm is taken from @xcite .
below 315 nm it is linearly extrapolated to 50% at @xmath36 = 190 nm .
the millipore reflectance is taken pure ( 100% ) lambertian .
the reflectance of gore material is taken from ref.@xcite .
the geometry of the pmt spherical window together with adjacent photocathode is coded using dimensions of the xp4500 and xp4572 pmt from the vendor @xcite .
the mean quantum efficiency of the bialcali photocathode is derived from typical spectrum of radiant sensitivity , also from the vendor . | 21st century promise unlocking mysteries inner quark - gluon structure atomic nucleus nucleons governed theory of strong interactions experimental program at upgraded 12 gev jefferson laboratory @xcite nearing completion understanding dynamics fundamental quarks gluons structure hadrons nuclei hall c heavily - shielded detector setup highly - focusing magnetic spectrometer large momentum reach optimal for deep exclusive semi - inclusive measurements high quality rosenbluth cross section separations hall c base experimental equipment two magnetic spectrometers high momentum super high momentum shms detect negatively or positively charged particles magnetic field trigger configuration hms secondary products reactions momentum 0.5 to 7.3 gev/@xmath4 shms 12 gev/@xmath4 both spectrometers equipped with drift chambers timing scintillator hodoscopes detectors particle identification aerogel erenkov detector schematic shms detector package in fig . particle identification relies on time - of - flight measurements at lower momentum electromagnetic pre - shower full shower calorimeter erenkov detectorserenkov detector filled with noble gases calorimeter used for @xmath8 separation separate erenkov detector with heavier gases@xmath9f@xmath10o @xmath11 identification above 3.4 gev/@xmath4 pid capability shms strangeness physics hall c program shms aerogel erenkov detector distinguish kaons from protons with momenta above 2.6 gev/@xmath4 schematic drawings of shms aerogel detector placement in shms detector hut detector stack gas erenkov drift chambers @xmath12 segmented scintillator gas erenkov gray cylinder two slots for aerogel detector 30 cm depth second @xmath12 scintillator / quartz bar hodoscope electromagnetic calorimeter schematic drawings shms aerogel detector in detector hut stack gas erenkov drift chambers @xmath12 segmented scintillator gas erenkov gray cylinder two slots for aerogel detector second @xmath12 segmented scintillator / quartz bar hodoscope electromagnetic calorimetermeson production experiments scaling l - t separated pion electroproduction cross section 11 gev - 07 - 105 ) - kaon electroproduction 5 - 11 gev - 09 - 011 3d hadron imaging form factor extractions kinematic regime signatures qcd provide high - quality cross section data detection scattered mesons 10 gev/ shms hall c additional instrumentation @xmath13/@xmath14 particle identification needed kaon measurement @xmath15 in sidis experiment e12 - 09 - 017 ) transverse momentum dependence semi - inclusive electroproduction charged mesons from proton deuteron targets separate kaons from protons measurement @xmath16@xmath17/@xmath18 in sidis e12 - 06 - 104 ) inclusive - exclusive connection meson electroproduction essential flavor decomposition semi - inclusive inelastic scattering at 12 gev @xmath13/@xmath14 separation additional flavors systems pion transparency experiment ( e12 - 06 - 107 ) transparency nuclear medium to pions approach qcd - calculable regime @xmath19 dependence cross sections nucleon nuclear targetskaon transparency measurements contribute information approach requirement high detection efficiency for separate protons from kaons experiments with electron beam energy up to 11 gev currents between 80 @xmath20a hitting liquid hydrogen deuterium target cells 10 cm solid targets particle rates up to 2 mhz additional aerogel erenkov detector system designed specifications sensitive area 90@xmath2160 @xmath22 thickness radiator up to 9 cm fit small slot 30 cm between detector electromagnetic calorimeter minimize material particle path multiple scattering-electrons small easy exchange aerogel material kaon momentum range provide acceptable time resolution high - rate capability approved experiments three e12 - 06 - 104 - 09 - 017 07 - 105 require kaon particle identification in 2.7 - 5 gev/@xmath4 momentum range higher momenta relevant for kaon factorization experiment - 09 - 011 up to 7.2 gev / c pion transparency measurement extraction transparencies up to 7 ( gev/@xmath4)@xmath25 2 7 gev/@xmath4 momentum refractive indices of aerogel material suited@xmath26 separation chose aerogel materials refractive indices @xmath3=1.030 sp-30.020 sp-20=1.015 sp-15.011 sp-11 threshold momenta gev/@xmath4 for muons pions kaons protons aerogel listed in table thresholds up to 4 gev/@xmath4 @xmath26 separation achieved with aerogel refractive index.030 lower three refractive indices provide excellent @xmath26 separation between 4 and gev/@xmath4 aerogel material characterized constant refractive index wavelength - dependent absorption scattering lengths @xmath28 @xmath29 parameters modeled studies aerogel optical properties wavelengths @xmath30300 nm transmittance aerogel described hunt formula constant absorption rayleigh scattering below 300 nm @xmath28 decreases @xmath29 changes less absorption scattering lengths aerogel constant absorption length for @xmath30 300 nm decreasing to 1 cm at @xmath32 200 nmconstant value @xmath30 300 nm tuned cosmic tests aerogel detector optimized optimum sensitivity pmts around 450 nm @xmath28=90 cm agreement simulation data sp-30 sp-20 aerogels consistent with measurement absorption length at 450 nm fig lower refractive index aerogels different vendor larger value suitable @xmath33220 cm scale @xmath29 less importance simulation accuracy derived from average value hunt clarity factor @xmath34 @xcite reflectivity millipore paper @xmath35 315 nm from @xcite below 315 nm extrapolated 50% at @xmath36 = 190 nm millipore reflectance pure 100% ) lambertian reflectance gore material from.@xcite geometry pmt spherical window adjacent photocathode coded dimensions xp4500 xp4572 pmt vendor @xcite mean quantum efficiency bialcali photocathode derived from typical spectrum radiant sensitivity vendor | 0.356711 | 2,450 | 1,274 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,518 | the microwave - excited high mobility two - dimensional electron system exhibits , at liquid helium temperatures , vanishing resistance in the vicinity of @xmath0 b_{f}$ ] , where @xmath1 , m@xmath2 is an effective mass , e is the charge , and _
f _ is the microwave frequency . here ,
we summarize some experimental results .
journal - reference : international journal of modern physics b * 18 * , 3473 ( 2004 ) | the creation , detection , and study of exciton condensates in semiconductors constitute interesting problems in condensed matter physics.@xcite exciton populations are usually created by photo - exciting a semiconductor , so that the electron - hole pairs consist of conduction band electrons and valence band holes .
then , optical techniques are employed to detect and study the excitonic system.@xcite recently , there has also been interest in the possibility of _ electrical detection _ , and the realization _ without photoexcitation _ , of such exotic states in a bilayer quantum hall system , where the excitons result from the pairing of electrons in one quantum hall layer with holes in the neighboring layer.@xcite this report examines a hybrid scenario where _ photoexcitation _ serves to create inter - landau level , instead of inter - band , excitations in a quantum hall system , as _ electrical detection _ is employed to detect the system response.@xcite in particular , we study _ transport _ in a semiconductor single - layer two - dimensional electron system , where _ microwave photo - excitation _ produces a steady state density of inter - landau level excitations ( `` excitons '' ) .
surprisingly , such a system exhibits novel zero - resistance states without concomitant hall quantization , at low temperatures , @xmath3 , about magnetic fields , @xmath4 = @xmath5 and @xmath4 = @xmath6 , where @xmath7 = @xmath8 , @xmath9 is an effective mass , @xmath10 is the electron charge , and @xmath11 is the radiation frequency.@xcite the experimental observations have led to a broad theoretical study of this situation.@xcite at the present , it is uncertain whether the observed zero - resistance states should be viewed as a novel condensate with a role for excitons , although we had suggested this possibility.@xcite theoretical studies have realized radiation - induced magneto - resistivity oscillations through various approaches.@xcite the observed zero - resistance states have then been attributed to a negative resistivity instability , and current - domain formation.@xcite as there remain many open questions from both the experimental and theoretical perspectives , we examine here just the experimental situation , and refer the reader to the literature for further theory .
experiments were carried out on standard devices fabricated from gaas / algaas heterostructures .
the best material was typically characterized by an electron density , @xmath12(4.2 k ) @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 , and an electron mobility , @xmath18 , up to @xmath19 @xmath15 @xmath20 @xmath21/vs .
standard four - terminal lock - in based electrical measurements were performed with the sample mounted inside a waveguide and immersed in pumped liquid he-3 or he-4 .
electromagnetic ( em ) waves in the microwave part of the spectrum were generated using tunable sources .
the em waves were directed to the sample through the waveguide .
further details appear elsewhere.@xcite the data of fig .
1(a ) illustrate the radiation - induced effect on the diagonal ( @xmath22 ) and hall resistances ( @xmath23 ) , when the specimen is excited with microwaves at @xmath11 = 108 ghz . in fig .
1(a ) , the application of microwaves induces giant oscillations in @xmath22 , which are characterized by the property that the @xmath22 under photoexcitation drops below the dark @xmath22 over wide @xmath4 intervals .
thus , at approximately @xmath24 = @xmath25 and @xmath24 = @xmath26 , with @xmath25 = 1,2,3 ... , the @xmath22 under photoexcitation is equal to the dark @xmath22 . for @xmath27 , the photo - excited @xmath22
is reduced with respect to the dark @xmath22 . on the other hand , for @xmath28 , the irradiated @xmath22
is enhanced with respect to the dark @xmath22 .
a remarkable feature in the data are the zero - resistance states which are manifested about @xmath29 , i.e. , in the vicinity of @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
these @xmath22 minima exhibit activated transport vs. the temperature , which is suggestive , from the experimental perspective , of a possible radiation - induced gap in the electronic spectrum.@xcite the data of fig .
1a also illustrate the influence of radiation on the hall effect . here
, a comparison of the dark @xmath23 with the photo - excited @xmath23 reveals subtle microwave induced oscillations , which are period commensurate with the radiation induced @xmath22 oscillations.@xcite yet , there do not occur microwave - induced plateaus in the hall effect that coincide with the radiation - induced vanishing @xmath22 in the vicinity of b = @xmath5 and @xmath32 . in order to highlight these radiation - induced changes in @xmath23 ,
@xmath33 is shown along with @xmath22 in fig .
1(b ) . a comparison of fig .
1(a ) and fig .
1(b ) shows clearly that @xmath23 is reduced in magnitude over the b - intervals , where @xmath22 is enhanced by the radiation . on the other hand , as the diagonal resistance vanishes upon microwave excitation , as in the vicinity of @xmath30 , for example , the correction @xmath34 also vanishes . as the period of the radiation induced oscillations ( see fig .
1 ) are mostly sensitive to the @xmath4-component that is perpendicular to the plane of the 2des , they tend to span a wider @xmath4-interval , at a finite tilt angle of the specimen .
thus , under tilt , the characteristic field scale becomes @xmath35 , and the dark @xmath22 intercepts the photo - excited @xmath22 in the vicinity of @xmath36/j$ ] and @xmath36/(j+1/2)$ ] , with @xmath25 = 1,2,3 ... these features can be detected in fig . 2 the phase of the radiation induced @xmath22 oscillations is an important parameter because it can be used to compare experiment to theory.@xcite to determine this observable , @xmath22 maxima and minima of 182 ghz data ( see fig .
3 ) are initially labelled by integers and half - integers , respectively , assuming a cosine waveform .
the extrema labels , denoted by the index @xmath37 in fig . 3 ,
are then plotted vs. extremal values of @xmath38 , and a linear fit , @xmath39 , is applied to determine the slope , @xmath40 = @xmath7 , and the ordinate intercept . in fig .
3 , the ordinate intercept for the fit of extremal data points at 1/4 demonstrates a 1/4-cycle phase shift of the extrema with respect to the assumed ( cosine ) waveform.@xcite thus , the plot ( fig .
3(a ) ) demonstrates that the phase is broadly consistent with a lineshape @xmath41 , i.e. , resistance minima about @xmath42 , and resistance maxima about @xmath43 .
a similar analysis of the nodes or fixed points suggests that they are characterized by @xmath44 , or @xmath45 , see fig .
3 . in prior work
, we have shown that the radiation induced resistance _ minima _ exhibit activated transport , i.e. , @xmath46.@xcite as a supplement to that previous report , we examine the @xmath3-dependence of the resistance _ maxima _ in fig .
thus , the inset in fig .
4 shows @xmath22 under microwave excitation , with a pair of marked maxima , whose @xmath3-evolution is followed in the main part of the figure .
4 shows that the @xmath22 maxima increase rapidly with decreasing temperature , and the variation can be empirically represented by an exponential function .
the @xmath3-variation of the maxima have been attributed by dmitriev et al .
, to the @xmath3-dependence of the inelastic scattering rate.@xcite measurements examining possible reflection / emission and transmission characteristics of the high mobility 2des under microwave excitation are illustrated in fig .
5 and fig .
6 . for these experiments
[ see inset , figs . 5 and 6 ] , a resistance sensor was placed immediately above or below the sample.@xcite fig .
5 exhibits the dark , and irradiated at 30 ghz , @xmath22 , along with the sensor @xmath47 response under photoexcitation . the irradiated @xmath22 shows giant microwave - induced oscillations .
note that , in this low-@xmath11 case , the irradiated @xmath22 crosses the dark @xmath22 also near @xmath48 . also shown in the figure
is @xmath49 , which serves to bring out weak features in the @xmath47 .
the @xmath47 signal shows a pair of significant features between @xmath7 and 2@xmath7 . here , the largest feature might originate from a two - photon process . in the derivative signal ,
there is a very weak feature near -@xmath7 ( but not at + @xmath7 ) , which could signify electrically detected cyclotron resonance .
the origin of other structure in the sensor signal is not fully understood .
some transmission measurements are shown in fig .
, the optimal radiation induced @xmath22 response was observed in the vicinity of -9 db . a further increase of the radiation intensity ( db @xmath50 0 ) produced a reduction in the peak height along with an increase in the resistance at the minima ( see fig .
6(a ) ) . at the same time , the transmission sensor ( see fig .
6(b ) ) indicated structure at @xmath4 @xmath51 @xmath7 , which correlated with a strong radiation - induced decrease in @xmath22 just above 0.3 tesla .
observed oscillations in @xmath22 below @xmath7 ( fig .
6(a ) ) were imperceptible , however , in the detector response ( see fig .
6(b ) ) .
it is also interesting to examine the effect of simultaneous excitation of the specimen at two different microwave frequencies.@xcite thus , fig .
7 exhibits measurements with excitation of the specimen at 15 ghz only , and at 50 ghz only . here , at 50 ghz
, there occur a number of radiation - induced oscillations and one broad zero - resistance state about @xmath52 . on the other hand , at 15 ghz , the radiation seems to produce a non - monotonic variation in @xmath22 , mostly above @xmath7 .
simultaneous excitation at two - frequencies produces a @xmath22 trace that looks very much like the trace at the higher @xmath11 , i.e. , 50 ghz . an interesting feature is observed here by comparing the @xmath53 and @xmath54 signals at @xmath4 @xmath13 0.07 t and @xmath4 @xmath13 0.14 t. at both these @xmath4 , the peak amplitude of the @xmath53 and @xmath54 signal is reduced with respect to the @xmath54 signal . yet
, one observes that in the @xmath4 @xmath13 0.07 t case , only @xmath53 produces an enhancement , while in the @xmath4 @xmath13 0.14 t case , it produces a resistance suppression , with respect to the dark signal .
thus , perhaps , one should attribute the small decrease in the amplitude of the @xmath53 and @xmath54 signal to a `` breakdown '' type heating effect , due to the increased radiation intensity resulting from the combined excitation .
in summary , radiation induced zero - resistance states and associated oscillations in the high mobility 2des exhibit a rich phenomenology . here , we have shown that ( a ) @xmath22 exhibits saturation at zero - resistance under microwave excitation in the vicinity of @xmath55 b_{f}$ ] , with concomitant vanishing hall resistance correction , @xmath56 , see fig . 1 , ( b ) the period of the radiation induced oscillations are mostly sensitive of the normal component of the magnetic field , see fig .
2 , ( c ) the oscillatory minima are shifted by 1/4 cycle with respect to the @xmath57 = @xmath25 condition , see fig . 3 , ( d ) the oscillatory resistance maxima increase strongly with decreasing temperature , see fig . 4 , ( e ) a response is observable in the transmission and reflection signals , mostly above @xmath7 , see figs . 5 and 6 , and ( e ) simultaneous photoexcitation at two radiation frequencies seems not to produce simple superposition , see fig . 7 .
we acknowledge discussions with k. von klitzing , v. narayanamurti , j. h. smet , and w. b. johnson , and the receipt of high quality mbe material from v. umansky .
r. g. mani et al . , _ nature ( london ) _ * 420 * , 646 ( 2002 ) ; _ phys .
b _ * 69 * , 193304 ( 2004 ) ; cond - mat/0305507 ; cond - mat/0306388 ; _ phys . rev .
b _ * 69 * , 161306 ( 2004 ) ; _ phys . rev
. lett . _ * 92 * , 146801 ( 2004 ) ; r. g. mani , _ physica e _ * 22 * , 1 ( 2004 ) ; cond - mat/0407143 . | creation detection study of exciton condensates in semiconductors problems in condensed matter physics exciton populations created by photo - exciting semiconductor electron - hole pairs of conduction band valence band holes optical techniques to detect study excitonic system interest in electrical detection realization without photoexcitation of exotic states in bilayer quantum hall system excitons result from pairing electrons in with holes neighboring layer report examines hybrid scenario where photoexcitation inter - landau level excitations in quantum hall system electrical detection system response study transport in semiconductor single - layer two - electron system microwave photo - excitation produces steady state density of inter - landau level excitations system exhibits novel zero - resistance states without hall quantization at low temperatures electron charge radiation frequency experimental observations led to broad theoretical study uncertain whether observed zero - resistance states as novel condensate with role for excitons theoretical studies realized radiation - induced magneto - resistivity oscillations approachesobserved zero - resistance states attributed to negative resistivity instability current - domain formation open questions experimental examine experimental situation refer to literature for theory experiments on devices from gaas / algaas heterostructures best material characterized by electron density(4.2 electron mobility to four - terminal lock - electrical measurements performed with sample inside waveguide immersed in pumped liquid he-3 or he-4 electromagnetic waves in microwave spectrum generated using tunable sources directed to sample through waveguide details elsewhere data of fig . 1(a ) illustrate radiation - induced effect on diagonal hall resistances when specimen excited with microwaves at @xmath11 = 108 ghz microwaves induces oscillations in @xmath22 under drops below dark @xmath22 over @xmath4 intervals at @xmath24 = @xmath25 = @xmath26 @xmath22 under photoexcitation equal to dark @xmath22 for @xmath27 photo - excited @xmath22 reduced dark@xmath28 irradiated @xmath22 enhanced dark @xmath22 zero - resistance states manifested about @xmath29 vicinity of @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath22 minima exhibit activated transport vs. temperature suggestive possible radiation - induced gap in electronic spectrum data fig . 1a illustrate influence radiation on hall effect comparison dark @xmath23 with photo - excited @xmath23 reveals subtle microwave induced oscillations commensurate with radiation induced @xmath22 oscillations microwave - induced plateaus coincide with radiation - induced vanishing @xmath22 vicinity of @xmath5 @xmath32 @xmath33 shown with @xmath22 in fig . 1(b ) @xmath23 reduced in magnitude over b - intervals @xmath22 enhanced by radiation diagonal resistance vanishes upon microwave excitation vicinity @xmath30 correction @xmath34 vanishes radiation induced oscillations sensitive to @xmath4-component perpendicular to plane 2des span wider @xmath4-interval finite tilt angleunder tilt field scale becomes @xmath35 dark @xmath22 intercepts photo - excited @xmath22 @xmath36/j+1/2 @xmath25 = 1,2,3 features detected in fig . 2 phase of radiation induced @xmath22 oscillations important experiment to theory @xmath22 maxima minima of 182 ghz data fig 3 labelled by integers half - integers assuming cosine waveform extrema labels index @xmath37 plotted vs. extremal values @xmath38 linear fit @xmath39 applied slope @xmath40 = @xmath7 ordinate intercept ordinate intercept for fit extremal data points at 1/4 demonstrates 1/4-cycle phase shift of cosine waveform plot fig . 3(a phase consistent with lineshape @xmath41 resistance minima @xmath42 maxima @xmath43 analysis nodes points characterized by @xmath44 or @xmath45 fig . 3 radiation induced resistance _ minima exhibit activated transport @xmath46. @xmath3-dependence of resistance _ maxima in fig .4 shows @xmath22 under microwave excitation marked maxima @xmath3-evolution followed maxima increase with decreasing temperature variation represented by exponential function @xmath3-variation attributed by to @xmath3-dependence inelastic scattering rate measurements reflection / emission transmission characteristics high mobility 2des under microwave excitation illustrated in fig . 5 6 resistance sensor placed above below sample fig . 5 exhibits dark irradiated at 30 ghz @xmath22 sensor @xmath47 response under photoexcitation irradiated @xmath22 shows microwave - induced oscillations irradiated @xmath22 crosses dark @xmath22 near @xmath48 shown @xmath49 weak features in @xmath47 signal shows significant features between @xmath7 and 2@xmath7 largest feature might from two - photon process weak feature near -@xmath7 could electrically detected cyclotron resonance origin of structure not understood transmission measurements shown in fig . optimal radiation induced @xmath22 response -9 db .increase radiation intensity @xmath50 0 produced reduction peak height increase resistance at minima fig . 6(a ) ) transmission sensor fig 6(b ) indicated structure at @xmath4 @xmath51 @xmath7 correlated with radiation - decrease in @xmath22 above 0.3 tesla oscillations @xmath22 below @xmath7 imperceptible in detector response fig . 6(b ) ) effect simultaneous excitation specimen at two microwave frequencies fig . 7 exhibits measurements at 15 ghz 50 ghz 50 ghz radiation - induced oscillations zero - resistance state about @xmath52 at 15 ghz radiation non - monotonic variation in @xmath22 above @xmath7 simultaneous excitation two frequencies produces @xmath22 trace like at higher @xmath11 50 ghz comparing @xmath53 @xmath54 signals at @xmath4 0.07 t 0.14 t peak amplitude of @xmath53 @xmath54 signal reduced @xmath4 @xmath13 0.07 t case only @xmath53 enhancement 0.14 t case resistance suppressionattribute decrease amplitude @xmath53 @xmath54 signal to breakdown heating effect increased radiation intensity combined excitation radiation induced zero - resistance states oscillations in high mobility 2des exhibit rich phenomenology @xmath22 saturation at zero - resistance under microwave excitation vicinity @xmath55 vanishing hall resistance correction @xmath56 radiation induced oscillations sensitive normal magnetic field oscillatory minima shifted by 1/4 cycle @xmath57 = @xmath25 condition oscillatory resistance maxima increase with decreasing temperature response observable in transmission reflection signals above @xmath7 simultaneous photoexcitation at two radiation frequencies simple superposition discussions with k. von klitzing v. narayanamurti j. h. smet w. b. johnson receipt of high quality material from v. umansky r. g. mani al . nature ( london ) 420 * 646 ( 2002 ) phys . b 69 193304 ( 2004 ) cond - mat/0305507 . rev . b 69 161306 ( 200492 146801 2004 ) r g. mani 22 * 2004 cond - mat/0407143 | 0.496474 | 3,012 | 1,523 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,526 | we use the unitary and analytic model of the pion electromagnetic form factor in order to evaluate in the lowest order the @xmath0 contribution into the muon magnetic anomaly .
we demonstrate , that this technique enables us to reduce the uncertainty of the theoretical prediction importantly in comparison to usual approaches , where the measured data are integrated directly . | the question of an experimental evidence of physics beyond the standard model ( sm ) has been and still is an issue in particle physics .
this topic is especially popular nowadays , when new high - energy experiments are being constructed and put in work . regarding the sm as a low - energy approximation of a more general theory
, one can expect the new physics to manifest itself in two ways : important effects in measurements at high energies or small effects at relatively low energies .
the latter is the case of the muon magnetic anomaly , often referred to as the muon @xmath1 problem . to answer the question ,
whether some new physic plays a role in this case , one needs to achieve a high precision in both , theoretical prediction and experimental measurement .
the muon gyromagnetic ratio relates the muon spin and magnetic momentum @xmath2 and the magnetic anomaly is defined by @xmath3 the higher muon mass makes its magnetic momentum , in comparison to the magnetic momentum of the electron , more sensitive to the non - perturbative hadronic effects and thus can the @xmath4 determination serve as a good test field of the theory of strong interactions .
a high - precision experimental result is available , the anomaly @xmath4 was measured by the @xmath1 collaboration in the e821 experiment at bnl with unprecedent precision of 0.7 ppm @xcite .
a high - precision theoretical prediction is available also , but only in the electromagnetic and electroweak sector the accuracy is satisfactory . in case of the hadronic contribution @xmath5 more precision is desirable , because this contribution is the dominant source of the total uncertainty of the theoretical prediction , which does not allow to conclude on possible physics beyond the sm .
depending on the author and the analyzed data one can cite different numbers . if one takes the values from the summary publication @xcite @xmath6 and @xmath7 one observes @xmath8
, @xmath9 .
the hadronic part is dominated by the lowest order and this can be calculated using the formula@xmath10 where @xmath11/[x^{2}+(1-x)\frac{s}{m_{\mu}^{2}}]$ ] and @xmath12 .
the most important contribution comes from the pion channel @xmath13 , which we study in this work .
the data are used to evaluate the integral up to few gev , above a perturbative calculation is possible . in order to compare to other authors we chose three different limits for the upper integration limit ( @xmath14 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 ) .
the expression ( [ eq : a_mi_had_lo ] ) was up to now @xcite always evaluated only by the direct integration of the @xmath17 data ( with small exceptions , see @xcite ) .
our motivation and our aim is to demonstrate , that the use of an appropriate model allows for a dramatic error reduction . the error reduction in this domain is of a crucial importance , since there is an effort to decrease even more the experimental error @xcite and so , if one wants to solve the @xmath1 puzzle , the theoretical precision will have to follow .
we base our evaluation of @xmath18 on the unitary and analytic ( u&a ) model of the pion electromagnetic ( em ) form factor and relate the form factor to the cross section @xmath19 , so as to obtain @xmath20 . for a reliable prediction one needs to construct a model that incorporates all known properties of the pion em form factor .
the form factor is charge - normalized @xmath21 and pqcd predicts its asymptotic behavior @xmath22 , where @xmath23 .
it is known , that @xmath24 is an analytic function in the whole complex @xmath25 plane , besides the branch points and the cut on the positive real axis , the cut going from the lowest branch point @xmath26 up to @xmath27 .
the pion form factor has also cut on the second , unphysical riemann sheet for @xmath28 and satisfies the unitarity condition @xmath29=\left[a_{1}^{1}(t)\right]^{*}f_{\pi}(t)+\sigma(t)$ ] , where @xmath30 is the _ p_-wave isovector transition amplitude for elastic @xmath31 scattering and @xmath32 approximates all higher contributions . for @xmath33 one
has @xmath34 and arrives to the so - called elastic unitarity condition .
the construction of the u&a model starts from the vector meson dominance ( vmd ) picture in which@xmath35 where @xmath36 is the vector meson - pion coupling constant , @xmath37 is the universal vector meson coupling constant and three resonances are taken into account .
we proceed to a non - linear transformation @xmath38^{2}}\ ] ] in order to build in the cut , the lowest branch point @xmath39 and an effective branch point @xmath40 , the latter meant to approximate all higher branch points .
the model then becomes@xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43,\ ] ] where @xmath44 and @xmath45 .
the expression can be modified further ; it can be shown that depending on the relative positions of thresholds and masses one has @xmath46 and @xmath47 .
the masses and @xmath40 are considered as free parameters of the model and so their relative positions are not fixed . however , in order to provide explicit formulas in the following text , we will here suppose @xmath48 , what is actually being confirmed by the result of the data fitting .
the next step in the model construction is incorporation of the cut on the second riemann sheet .
we use a succession of poles and zeros generated by a rational function to approximate this cut ( pad approximation ) .
we do it by adding to the model a multiplicative term @xmath49 , where @xmath50 and @xmath51 are free parameters from the interval @xmath52 ( corresponds to @xmath28 ) . the construction of the model is finally achieved by giving the vector mesons non - zero decay widths @xmath53 .
the model gets form@xmath54=\left(\frac{1-w^{2}}{1-w_{n}^{2}}\right)^{2}\frac{\left(w - w_{z}\right)\left(w_{n}-w_{p}\right)}{\left(w_{n}-w_{z}\right)\left(w - w_{p}\right)}\ ] ] @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58.\ ] ] the ratio of couplings @xmath59 is a free parameter of the model , the two remaining ratios , @xmath60 and @xmath61 , can be related to the first one by using the normalization condition @xmath21 and by considering the behavior of the imaginary part of the form factor at @xmath62 .
the @xmath63 interference is taken into account when fitting the experimental data by a breit - wigner term , the fitting function is@xmath64+re^{i\phi}\frac{m_{\omega}^{2}}{m_{\omega}^{2}-t - im_{\omega}\gamma_{\omega}},\ ] ] where @xmath65 and the amplitude @xmath66 is considered as an additional free parameter .
the fitting function thus has 11 free parameters in total ( @xmath67 three masses , three widths , ratio @xmath59 , @xmath68 , @xmath51 and @xmath66 ) and is used to fit 523 experimental points measured in experiments _ cleo _ , _ na7 _ , _ olya _ , _ cmd _ , _ cmd-2 _ , _ snd _ , _ kloe _ , in _ jinr _ dubna and in @xmath69 collaboration at jefferson lab @xcite .
the best fit result is shown in figure [ fig : fit ] .
fit of the data with the u&a model . ]
two approaches were used for the error evaluation .
the first one was a `` monte carlo '' method based on a random number generator with the assumption of the gaussian distribution for the uncertainties of the published data points .
for each point a new one was randomly generated using the gaussian probability density function with the mean identical to the original point and @xmath70 equal to the published error .
doing this for each point , new `` random '' data set was obtained .
this data set was then fitted and the values of the parameters of the model @xmath71 as well as the value of @xmath18 were extracted . repeating the whole procedure 4000 times , we reached statistics high enough to allow us for a reliable error calculation .
the mean @xmath72 and the @xmath70 were calculated from the 4000 values and since the mean is not , in general , identical with the optimal - fit value @xmath73 we present asymmetric uncertainties @xmath74 , where @xmath75 and @xmath76 . in the second approach
the program minuit was used to establish the uncertainties of the model parameters .
then , taking the numerical derivatives for @xmath77 , the uncertainty was propagated to @xmath18 using the covariance matrix . in this method
the errors are symmetric .
in addition to the integration of the model , we also performed a direct integration of the data points based on the trapezoidal rule , so as to cross - check our compatibility with other authors .
our results and some results from other authors @xcite are summarized in table [ tab : results ] .
llll & interval @xmath78 $ ] & @xmath79 & @xmath80 & @xmath81 model , method 1 & @xmath82 & @xmath83 & @xmath84 model , method 2 & @xmath85 & @xmath86 & @xmath87 data & @xmath88 & @xmath89 & @xmath90 _ davier _ & @xmath91 & & _ hagiwara et al . _
& & @xmath92 & _ yndurin et al .
_ & & & @xmath93
the use of the u&a model dramatically reduces the error on @xmath18 .
this is not an arbitrary feature of the model but originates from model - independent information which is additional to the data in the integration region and which can be taken into account when the model is used .
the most important sources contributing to error reduction are * expected smoothness of the @xmath24 at small scale @xmath94 : the model provides a function behaving smoothly at small @xmath94 . * experimental data outside the integration region :
the fit is done not only to the data inside , but also to the data outside the integration region .
* theoretical knowledge on @xmath24 : the model respects all known properties of the pion em form factor .
especially the first point plays an important role .
the new precise data tend to lie above older , less precise data and , in some regions , the vertical spread of the data is very important , at the limit of inconsistency .
if the calculation of the integral is based directly on data , then less precise data shift the mean value of the integral and enlarge the uncertainty .
when the model is used , the predicted behavior of @xmath24 as given by the result of the fit is mostly determined by precisely measured points and is only little influenced by data with important uncertainties .
this leads to more appropriate mean value and smaller errors . in consequence ,
one arrives to the mean value of @xmath18 which is higher then what is obtained by the direct data integration and to much reduced uncertainty .
the shift in the mean value goes in the `` right '' direction and brings the theoretical value closer to the experimental one .
the error estimates from the two used methods are not fully compatible , the first method gives smaller errors .
this might be related to statistical fluctuations ( 1st method ) and to approximations - numerical derivatives and linearization ( 2nd method ) . in this article we presented the calculation of @xmath18 based on the u&a model .
this approach allows for important error reduction and we plan to use it also for evaluating the contributions of other channels to @xmath95 .
the work was partly supported by slovak grant agency for sciences vega , grant no . 2/7116/29 . | experimental evidence physics beyond standard model sm issue in particle physics popular new high - energy experiments sm low - energy approximation general theory new physics effects high energies or small effects at low energies muon magnetic anomaly muon @xmath1 problem new physic needs high precision in theoretical prediction experimental measurement muon gyromagnetic ratio relates muon spin magnetic momentum @xmath2 magnetic anomaly defined by @xmath3 higher muon mass makes magnetic momentum sensitive to non - perturbative hadronic effects @xmath4 determination test theory of strong interactions high - precision experimental result available anomaly @xmath4 measured by @xmath1 collaboration in e821 experiment at bnl with precision 0.7 ppm high - precision theoretical prediction available in electromagnetic electroweak sector accuracy satisfactory hadronic contribution @xmath5 more precision desirable dominant source of uncertainty theoretical prediction possible physics beyond sm depending author analyzed data cite different numbers values from summary publication @xcite @xmath6 @xmath7 observes @xmath8 @xmath9 hadronic part dominated by lowest order calculated using formula@xmath10 @xmath11/[x^{2}+(1-x)\frac{s}{m_{\mu}^{2}}]$ ] and @xmath12 important contribution from pion channel @xmath13 study data evaluate integral up to few gev perturbative calculation possible chose three limits for upper integration limit @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 ) expression ( [ eq : a_mi_had_lo ] evaluated by direct integration @xmath17 data demonstrate appropriate model allows dramatic error reduction error reduction crucial decrease experimental error @xmath1 puzzle theoretical precision follow base evaluation of @xmath18 on model of pion electromagnetic form factor relate form factor to cross section @xmath19 obtain @xmath20 reliable prediction model properties pion em form factor form factor charge - normalized @xmath21 predicts asymptotic behavior @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 is analytic function in complex @xmath25 plane branch points cut on positive real axis from lowest branch point @xmath26 up to @xmath27pion form factor cut second riemann sheet @xmath28 satisfies unitarity condition @xmath29=\left[a_{1}^}(t\right]^{*}f_{\pi}(t)+\sigma(t)$ ] @xmath30 p_-wave isovector transition amplitude elastic @xmath31 scattering @xmath32 approximates higher contributions @xmath33 @xmath34 elastic unitarity condition construction u&a model starts vector meson dominance picture@xmath35 @xmath36 vector meson - pion coupling constant @xmath37 universal vector meson coupling constant three resonances non - linear transformation @xmath38^{2}} build cut lowest branch point @xmath39 effective branch point @xmath40 approximate higher branch points model becomes@xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 expression modified depending relative positions thresholds masses @xmath46 @xmath47 masses @xmath40 free parameters relative positions not fixed suppose @xmath48 confirmed result data fitting next step incorporation cut second riemann sheet succession poles zeros rational function approximate cutadding model multiplicative term @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 free parameters interval @xmath52 corresponds @xmath28 construction model vector mesons non - zero decay widths @xmath53 model form@xmath54=\left({1-w\right @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 ratio couplings @xmath59 free parameter model two remaining ratios @xmath60 @xmath61 related first one normalization condition @xmath21 considering behavior imaginary part form factor @xmath62 @xmath63 interference fitting experimental data breit - wigner term fitting function is@xmath64+re^{i}\frac{m\omega\omega{2}-t - im_\omega}\gamma_{\omega}} @xmath65 amplitude @xmath66 additional free parameterfitting function has 11 parameters ( @xmath67 three masses widths @xmath59 @xmath68 @xmath51 @xmath66 ) used to fit 523 experimental points in cleo na7 olya cmd cmd-2 snd kloe jinr dubna @xmath69 jefferson lab @xcite best fit result shown in figure data u&a model two approaches for error evaluation first `` monte carlo '' method random number generator gaussian distribution for uncertainties each point new one randomly generated mean identical to original point @xmath70 equal to published error new random data set obtained data set fitted values of model @xmath71 @xmath18 extracted 4000 times reached statistics for reliable error calculation mean @xmath72 and @xmath70 calculated from 4000 values mean not identical with optimal - fit value @xmath73 asymmetric uncertainties @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 second approach program minuit to establish uncertainties of model parameters @xmath77 uncertainty propagated to @xmath18 using covariance matrix errors are symmetricintegration model performed direct integration of data points based trapezoidal rule cross - check compatibility with other authors results from other authors summarized in table [ tab results ] interval @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 model method 1 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 model method 2 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 davier @xmath91 hagiwara et al . @xmath92 yndurin et al . @xmath93 use u&a model reduces error on @xmath18 not arbitrary feature model originates from model - independent information additional to data integration region important sources error reduction expected smoothness of @xmath24 at small scale @xmath94 model experimental data outside integration region fit done to theoretical knowledge on @xmath24 model respects properties of pion em form factor first point important role new precise data above older less precise data vertical spread data important limit inconsistency calculation integral less precise data shift mean value integral enlarge uncertainty model predicted behavior of @xmath24 determined by precisely measured points little influenced by data with important uncertaintiesleads to appropriate mean value smaller errors arrives to mean value @xmath18 higher direct data integration reduced uncertainty shift in mean value brings theoretical value closer to experimental error estimates two methods not compatible first method gives smaller errors related to statistical fluctuations 1st approximations - numerical derivatives linearization 2nd presented calculation of @xmath18 u&a model approach allows error reduction plan use evaluating contributions other channels to @xmath95 supported by slovak grant agency grant 2/7116/29 | 0.430034 | 2,634 | 1,388 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,528 | the generalization of the maximum - likelihood - like estimator for clock skew by leng and wu in the above paper is erroneous because the correlation of the noise components in the model is not taken into account in the derivation of the maximum likelihood estimator , its performance bound , and the optimal selection of the gap between two subtracting time stamps .
this comment investigates the issue of noise correlation in the model and provides the range of the gap for which the maximum likelihood estimator and its performance bound are valid and corrects the optimal selection of the gap based on the provided range .
clock synchronization , two - way message exchanges , maximum likelihood estimation . | as one of the three clock - synchronization algorithms studied for wireless sensor networks ( wsns ) under unknown delay @xcite , leng and wu proposed the generalization of the maximum - likelihood - like estimator ( mlle ) proposed by noh _ et al_. @xcite . to overcome the drawback of the mlle that it can utilize only the time stamps in the first and the last of @xmath0 message exchanges , they extend the gap @xmath1 between two subtracting time stamps from @xmath2 to a range of @xmath3 $ ] so that the generalized mlle can take into more time stamps in estimating clock skew . specifically , the time stamps in two - way message exchanges are modeled as ( * ? ? ?
( 1 ) and ( 2 ) ) @xmath4 where @xmath5 and @xmath6 denote the clock offset and clock skew of the child node @xmath7 with respect to the parent node @xmath8 , respectively ; @xmath9 represents the fixed portion of one - way propagation delay , while @xmath10 and @xmath11 are its variable portions ( see fig . 1 of @xcite ) .
based on and , they construct new sequences @xmath12 ( @xmath13 and @xmath14 ) and model them as follows ( * ? ? ? * eqs .
( 10 ) and ( 11 ) ) : @xmath15 for @xmath13 . noting that @xmath16 and @xmath17 because @xmath18 and @xmath19 are i.i.d .
zero - mean gaussian random variables with variance @xmath20 , they obtain the maximum - likelihood estimator ( mle ) for @xmath6 given by ( * ? ? ?
* eq . ( 13 ) )
@xmath21 the major problem in the derivation of the mle for @xmath6 given in is that , even though @xmath18 and @xmath19 are i.i.d .
gaussian random variables , the noise components @xmath22 and @xmath23 are not in general : for @xmath24 and @xmath25 , @xmath26 \notag \\ & = -\operatorname{e}\left[x_{\alpha+m}x_{n}\right ] - \operatorname{e}\left[x_{m}x_{\alpha+n}\right ] \notag \\ & = \begin{cases } -\sigma^{2 } , & \mbox{if } \alpha=\left|m - n\right| \\ 0 , & \mbox{otherwise } \end{cases } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and
the same goes for @xmath23 .
note that , if the noise components are independent one another as claimed in @xcite , the expectation in must be zero .
the consequence of is that @xmath1 should be greater than @xmath27 , i.e. , @xmath28 in order to maintain the validity of the derivation of the mle for @xmath6 ( * ? ? ?
* eq . ( 13 ) ) and its performance bound ( * ? ? ?
* eq . ( 29 ) ) : if @xmath29 , there exists at least one pair of @xmath30 and @xmath31 satisfying @xmath32 so that the noise components are no longer independent one another .
for example , let @xmath31 be 1
. then @xmath33 satisfies the said condition . because @xmath29 and @xmath34 @xmath30 belongs to @xmath35 .
[ fig : noise_correlation_effect ] clearly shows the effect of the noise correlation on the mean square error ( mse ) of estimation of clock skew and the relationship between @xmath1 and @xmath0 when snr=30 db and @xmath36 . in the figure
, ge1 denotes the simulation results of the generalized mlle for time stamps and resulting sequences generated according to the original models of through ; ge2 , on the other hand , denotes the results for the time sequences in and with the noise components @xmath37 and @xmath38 replaced by two newly - generated i.i.d .
zero - mean gaussian random variables with variance @xmath39 .
if @xmath1 is greater than @xmath27 , we can see that the results of ge1 closely match with the performance bounds ( i.e. , pb@xmath40 ) because there is no issue of noise correlation ; for example , when @xmath1 is 10 , the results of ge1 match with the performance bounds for @xmath0 up to 20 .
compared to the results for ge1 , the results for ge2 of a fictitious model show that they can attain the performance bounds irrespective of the value of @xmath1 because there is no issue of noise correlation at all .
it is interesting , though , that the results of ge1 for @xmath41 show even better performance than the performance bounds . with the valid range of @xmath1 given by , the selection of the optimal @xmath1 given in eqs .
( 32 ) and ( 33 ) of @xcite should be modified accordingly . because @xmath42 in eq .
( 32 ) of @xcite is concave downward for the whole range of real - valued @xmath43 $ ] , @xmath44 in eq .
( 33 ) of @xcite is now simplified as follows : @xmath45 k .- l .
noh , q. m. chaudhari , e. serpedin , and b. w. suter , `` novel clock phase offset and skew estimation using two - way timing message exchanges for wireless sensor networks , '' _ ieee trans .
_ , vol .
55 , no . 4 ,
pp . 766777 , apr . | of three clock - synchronization algorithms for wireless sensor networks under unknown delay @xcite leng wu proposed generalization maximum - likelihood - estimator mlle by noh al mlle time stamps in first last @xmath0 message exchanges gap between two subtracting time stamps from to range @xmath3 generalized mlle more time stamps estimating clock skew time stamps in two - way message exchanges modeled as @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 denote clock offset skew of child node @xmath7 parent node @xmath8 @xmath9 fixed portion of one - way propagation delay @xmath10 variable portions fig 1 construct new sequences @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 ) model @xmath15 for @xmath13 @xmath16 zero - mean gaussian random variables with variance @xmath20 obtain maximum - likelihood estimator mle ) for @xmath6 given by @xmath21 major problem in derivation of mle for @xmath6 @xmath18 @xmath19 i.i.dgaussian random variables noise components @xmath22 @xmath23 not general @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 \notag\operatorname\left[x\alpha+m}x{n\right ]+n\notag\begin{cases -\sigma^{2 }\mbox{if } \alpha=\left|m - n\right| 0\mbox{otherwise }\end{cases }\end{aligned} same @xmath23 if noise components independent expectation must be zero @xmath1 greater than @xmath27 @xmath28 maintain validity derivation mle @xmath6 performance bound @xmath29 one pair of @xmath30 @xmath31 satisfying @xmath32 noise components no longer independent @xmath31 be 1 @xmath33 satisfies condition @xmath29 @xmath34 @xmath30 belongs to @xmath35 fig : noise_correlation_effect ] shows effect noise correlation on mean square error estimation clock skew relationship between @xmath1 @xmath0 when snr=30 db @xmath36 figure ge1 simulation results generalized mlle time stamps sequences original models ge2 denotes results time sequences noise components @xmath37 @xmath38 replaced by newly - generated zero - mean gaussian random variables variance @xmath39 if @xmath1 greater than @xmath27 results ge1 match performance bounds@xmath40 no issue noise correlation @xmath1 10 results ge1 match performance bounds @xmath0 up to 20 ge2 fictitious model attain performance bounds irrespective value @xmath1 no issue noise correlation results ge1 @xmath41 show better performance performance bounds valid range @xmath1 selection optimal @xmath1 eqs . ( 32 ) ( 33 ) @xcite modified @xmath42 eq 32 ) concave downward range real - valued @xmath43 @xmath44 eq 33 ) @xcite simplified @xmath45 noh chaudhari serpedin suter novel clock phase offset skew estimation two - way timing message exchanges wireless sensor networks trans vol . 55 , no . 4 pp . 766777 | 0.185676 | 1,262 | 665 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,535 | we show that any open aspherical manifold of dimension @xmath0 is tangentially homotopy equivalent to an @xmath1-manifold whose universal cover is not homeomorphic to @xmath2 . | davis famously constructed , for every @xmath0 , a closed aspherical @xmath1-manifold whose universal cover is not homeomorphic to @xmath2 @xcite .
we prove : [ thm : univ cover not rn ] if the universal cover of an open smooth manifold @xmath3 is diffeomorphic to @xmath2 with @xmath0 , then the tangential homotopy type of @xmath3 contains a continuum of open smooth @xmath1-manifolds whose universal covers are not homeomorphic to @xmath2 .
our proof also works in pl and top categories . recall that a homotopy equivalence @xmath4 of @xmath1-manifolds is _ tangential _ if @xmath5 and @xmath6 are stably isomorphic , where @xmath7 denotes the tangent bundle if @xmath8 is a smooth manifold and the tangent microbundle in the pl or top cases . by (
* theorem 2.3 ) this is equivalent to requiring that @xmath9 is homotopic to a cat - homeomorphism for some @xmath10 ( where cat equals diff , pl or top ) .
\(1 ) a result of curtis - kwun @xcite that for a boundary connected sum @xmath13 of a countable family of compact @xmath1-manifolds , the homeomorphism type of @xmath14 determines the isomorphism class of @xmath15 .
\(2 ) a recent result of calcut - king - siebenmann @xcite that any countable collection of cat properly embedded @xmath16 s in @xmath2 is cat unknotted , which generalizes classical results of cantrell and stallings .
\(3 ) the existence of infinitely many smooth compact contractible @xmath1-manifolds whose boundary homology spheres have freely indecomposable fundamental groups .
( such examples can be found in @xcite , and more examples are now known , see e.g. casson - harer @xcite for aspherical homology @xmath17-spheres that bound smooth contractible @xmath18-manifolds , while kervaire @xcite showed that the fundamental group of any homology @xmath17-sphere appears as the fundamental group of the boundary of a smooth contractible @xmath1-manifolds for any @xmath11 ) .
since @xmath3 is open , it contains a cat properly embedded ray whose cat regular neighborhood is an embedded closed halfspace , see e.g. ( * ? ? ?
* section 3 ) .
hence @xmath3 is cat isomorphic to the interior of a noncompact manifold @xmath19 whose boundary is an open disk . by the strong version of the cantrell - stalling hyperplane unknotting theorem proved in ( * ? ? ?
* corollary 9.3 ) , the universal cover of @xmath19 can be compactified to @xmath20 , the @xmath1-disk , in which the preimage of @xmath21 becomes the union of a countable collection of round open disks with pairwise disjoint closures .
let @xmath22 be an infinite sequence of compact contractible @xmath1-manifolds , such that @xmath23 are pairwise non - isomorphic and freely indecomposable .
given a subset @xmath24 , let @xmath25 be a boundary connected sums of @xmath26 s with indices in @xmath27 .
( for our purposes the choices involved in defining boundary connected sums will always be irrelevant ) .
fix a closed @xmath28-disk @xmath29 , and let @xmath30 be a boundary connected sum of @xmath19 and @xmath25 obtained by identifying @xmath31 with a closed disk in @xmath21 .
a deformation retraction @xmath32 extends to a deformation retraction of @xmath33 , so @xmath34 is tangentially homotopy equivalent to @xmath3 . if @xmath35 denotes a boundary connected sum of countably many copies of @xmath25 , then the interior of the universal cover of @xmath30 is homeomorphic to the interior of a boundary connected sum of @xmath20 and @xmath35 , which is homeomorphic to @xmath36 . by
* theorem 4.1 ) if @xmath35 , @xmath37 have homeomorphic interiors , then @xmath38 , @xmath39 have isomorphic fundamental groups .
now @xmath40 is a free product in which each factor @xmath41 , @xmath42 appears countably many times .
each @xmath41 is freely indecomposable , so @xmath43 by grushko s theorem .
thus the universal covers of @xmath44 lie in a continuum of homeomorphism types .
the proof of ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 4.1 ) is quite technical , which may be due to the fact that the tools of siebenmann s thesis were not yet available at the time , so we summarize it in a modern language : given @xmath45 it is easy to construct a cofinal family @xmath46 of neighborhoods of infinity in @xmath35 such that in the corresponding inverse sequence of fundamental groups , the group @xmath47 is the free product of @xmath48 , and the map @xmath49 is a retraction onto the first @xmath50 factors , and in particular , is surjective .
hence the inverse sequence of groups is mittag - leffler , and therefore its pro - equivalence class depends only on the homeomorphism type of @xmath35 .
now if @xmath35 , @xmath37 have homeomorphic interiors , then a simple diagram chase in the commutative diagram from the definition of pro - equivalence shows that each free factor of @xmath51 occurs as a free factor of @xmath52 , so @xmath43 .
theorem [ thm : univ cover not rn ] should hold for @xmath53 , but our proof fails .
one could try substituting the boundary connected sum of @xmath19 and @xmath35 by the end sum of @xmath3 with a suitable whitehead manifold , but the multiple hyperplane unknotting is no longer true , due to existence of an exotic @xmath54\times \mathbb r^2 $ ] @xcite .
this makes analyzing the fundamental group of infinity more delicate . for the same reason we do not attempt to prove theorem [ thm : univ cover not rn ] for @xmath3
whose universal cover is not @xmath2 . by the cartan - hadamard theorem
any ( complete riemannian ) @xmath1-manifold of nonpositive curvature is covered by @xmath2 .
so given an open @xmath1-manifold of nonpositive curvature with @xmath0 , theorem [ thm : univ cover not rn ] yields a continuum of @xmath1-manifolds in the same tangential homotopy type that admit no metric of nonpositive curvature . in @xcite the author studied obstructions to nonpositive curvature on open manifolds that go beyond the cartan - hadamard theorem . | davis constructed @xmath0 closed aspherical @xmath1-manifold cover not homeomorphic @xmath2 prove if cover open manifold @xmath3 diffeomorphic to @xmath2 tangential homotopy @xmath3 contains open @xmath1-manifolds not homeomorphic @xmath2 proof works in pl top categories homotopy equivalence @xmath4 of @xmath1-manifolds tangential if @xmath5 @xmath6 isomorphic @xmath7 denotes tangent bundle if @xmath8 smooth manifold microbundle pl top cases equivalent @xmath9 homotopic cat - homeomorphism @xmath10 cat equals diff top curtis - kwun boundary connected sum @xmath13 @xmath1-manifolds homeomorphism @xmath14 determines isomorphism class @xmath15 calcut - king - siebenmann cat embedded @xmath16 s in @xmath2 cat unknotted generalizes classical results cantrell stallings infinitely many smooth compact contractible @xmath1-manifolds boundary homology spheres indecomposable fundamental groups examples in @xcitecasson - harer @xcite aspherical homology @xmath17-spheres bound @xmath18-manifolds kervaire @xcite fundamental group @xmath17-sphere boundary contractible @xmath1-manifolds @xmath11 @xmath3 open contains cat embedded ray closed halfspace section 3 @xmath3 cat isomorphic interior noncompact manifold @xmath19 open disk cantrell - stalling hyperplane unknotting theorem 9.3 universal cover @xmath19 compactified @xmath20 @xmath1-disk preimage @xmath21 union round open disks disjoint closures @xmath22 infinite sequence compact contractible @xmath1-manifolds @xmath23 non - isomorphic indecomposable subset @xmath24 @xmath25 boundary connected sums @xmath26 s indices @xmath27 choices defining boundary sums irrelevant fix closed @xmath28-disk @xmath29 @xmath30 boundary connected sum @xmath19 @xmath25 identifying @xmath31 closed disk @xmath21 deformation retraction @xmath32 extends retraction @xmath33 @xmath34 homotopy equivalent @xmath3@xmath35 sum copies @xmath25 universal cover @xmath30 homeomorphic to sum @xmath20 and @xmath35 homeomorphic to @xmath36 theorem 4.1 @xmath35 @xmath37 have homeomorphic interiors @xmath38 @xmath39 have isomorphic fundamental groups @xmath40 free product each factor @xmath41 @xmath42 appears many times @xmath41 indecomposable @xmath43 grushko s theorem universal covers of @xmath44 in continuum of homeomorphism types proof of theorem 4.1 ) technical tools siebenmann s thesis available @xmath45 easy construct cofinal family @xmath46 of neighborhoods infinity in @xmath35 group @xmath47 free product of @xmath48 map @xmath49 retraction onto first @xmath50 factors surjective inverse sequence of groups mittag - leffler pro - equivalence class depends on homeomorphism type @xmath35 @xmath35 @xmath37 have homeomorphic interiors each free factor of @xmath51 occurs as free factor of @xmath52 @xmath43 theorem should hold for @xmath53 proof failssubstituting sum @xmath19 by sum @xmath3 with whitehead manifold multiple hyperplane unknotting true due exotic @xmath54 r @xcite analyzing fundamental group infinity delicate prove theorem [ cover for @xmath3 cover not @xmath2 cartan - hadamard theorem @xmath1-manifold nonpositive curvature covered by @xmath2 open @xmath1-manifold nonpositive curvature with @xmath0 theorem yields continuum of @xmath1-manifolds same homotopy no metric nonpositive curvature author studied obstructions nonpositive curvature on open manifolds beyond cartan - hadamard theorem | 0.259538 | 1,551 | 867 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,543 | using an improved version of the hartree approximation , allowing for ensembles of inhomogeneous configurations , we show in a @xmath0 theory , that initially the system thermalises with a bose - einstein distribution .
for later times and larger couplings we see deviations . | in many parts of high energy physics like early universe physics and heavy ion collisions one wants to follow quantum field systems in time .
typical phenomena include reheating after inflation : after a phase of parametric resonance most energy is in a small part of the spectrum , a non - thermal initial condition . in order to study these systems and to describe phase transitions and thermal fluctuations between classical minima ,
non - perturbative approximation schemes are needed .
examples of high temperature approximations , that have been used successfully are the classical approximation@xcite and the hartree or gaussian approximation@xcite .
the latter assumes a gaussian density matrix , such that all information is contained in the 1- and 2-point functions , higher point functions can be factorised using wick s theorem .
instead of the commonly used hartree approximation , which has a spatially constant mean field we used an improved version , allowing for _ inhomogeneous _ configurations .
we studied this approximation in a scalar @xmath1 theory in @xmath2 dimensions : @xmath3 in the gaussian approximation we can expand the operator field in mode functions : @xmath4 where the _ time - independent _ @xmath5 and @xmath6 satisfy the usual commutation relations .
we can choose them such that : @xmath7 for a free thermal system the @xmath8 have a bose - einstein form and the @xmath9 are plane waves , with suitable normalisation .
the heisenberg equations of motions in the gaussian approximation in eq .
( [ eq : eom_phi ] ) while omitting eq .
( [ eq : eom_mode ] ) .
the large @xmath10 approximation leads to @xmath11 in eq .
( [ eq : eom_phi ] ) and eq .
( [ eq : eom_mode ] ) .
we chose not to use large @xmath10 to avoid problems with would - be goldstone bosons in @xmath2 dimensions . ]
become : @xmath12 } & \phi(x , t ) & = 0 , \label{eq : eom_phi } \\
\mbox { [ } \partial_t^2 - \triangle + \mu^2 + 3 \lambda \phi^2(x , t ) + 3 \lambda \sigma(x , t ) \mbox { ] } & f_\alpha(x , t ) & = 0 , \label{eq : eom_mode}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath13 we mention that there exists an effective hamiltonian which leads to the above equations , suggesting that in the end the system will equilibrate classically according to this @xmath14 .
but we hope that this has a timescale much larger than that of all interesting processes .
[ [ initial - conditions ] ] initial conditions + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we need to specify the initial fields and their conjugate momenta , which together with the @xmath15 specifies an initial gaussian density matrix . by averaging over different runs with different initial conditions we can build non - gaussian density matrices , allowing for much more general initial conditions .
only the time evolution is evaluated with gaussian density matrices .
we will take the mean field in its zero - temperature minimum , with all energy in a few of its momentum modes , like after parametric resonance : @xmath16 where the @xmath17 s are random phases and @xmath18 is of the order @xmath19
. we will average over several runs , typically 10 - 20 .
for simplicity we will take the quantum modes equal to the zero - temperature vacuum form : @xmath20 with @xmath21 , @xmath19 chosen as the zero - temperature mass and @xmath22 the size of the system . to put the system on a computer we discretise it on a space - time lattice . in the limit of ( spatial )
lattice spacing @xmath23 to zero , the mode sum @xmath24 occurring in the equations of motion is logarithmically diverging , but this can be fixed by a simple mass renormalisation : @xmath25 . [ [ thermalisation ] ] thermalisation + + + + + + + + + + + + + + if @xmath26 is small and the system is not too far from equilibrium the interaction of the mode functions with the typically _ inhomogeneous _ mean field can be viewed as scattering of particles via the mean field . because of this scattering they will hopefully thermalise according to a thermal i.e. bose - einstein distribution . to check this ,
a definition of particle number is needed . for a free thermal system
the 2-point functions read : @xmath27 we want to define an @xmath28 and @xmath29 in a similar way as eq .
[ eq:2pnt ] .
this can be done by coarsening the measured 2-point functions over the initial conditions , a time interval , and space .
in fig . [ fig : phi ] we plotted for a typical run ( @xmath30 lattice points , size @xmath31 , @xmath32 ) the spatial averages of the mean field and the energy densities as a function of time . we see that the energy , initially completely in the mean field , is going to the modes with a timescale of the order 100 in mass units .
the total energy is conserved up to a few percent . the energy staying in the mean field around 20% is much more than expected from classical equipartition : around @xmath33 for @xmath30 mode functions .
[ fig : distrib ] shows a plot of the calculated particle numbers obtained after averaging over whole space , approximately 5 oscillation periods and 10 configurations . on the left
the situation is plotted at shorter times , on the right at larger times .
we see that starting at low momenta , a bose - einstein distribution is emerging
. only the zero mode is showing deviations
. runs at twice this energy density show very similar results , but with faster thermalisation . at large times deviations from the straight line
be s start to show up , which we interpret as signs of classical equipartition . for strong coupling or after a long times we see the emergence of an offset , which might be a chemical potential following from approximate particle conservation .
we finally mention checks with different kinds of initial conditions ( not presented here ) , which also show thermalisation according to a bose - einstein distribution .
using our hartree ensemble approximation with inhomogeneous mean fields , we find thermalisation according to a bose - einstein distribution , starting in the low momentum modes
. the time - scales heavily depend on the size of the coupling and the energy density .
signs of classical equilibration occur only at timescales much larger than that for the onset of the bose - einstein thermalisation , so even if they will prevent the be thermalisation to reach arbitrary high values of @xmath34 , they do not influence processes with an intermediate timescale .
grigoriev , d. , and rubakov , v. , _ nucl .
* b299 * , 67 - 78 ( 1988 ) aarts , g. , bonini , g.f . , and wetterich , c. , ` hep - ph/0007357 ` mihaila , b. , athan , t. , cooper , f. , dawson , j. , and habib , s. , ` hep - ph/0003105 ` | high energy physics early universe physics heavy ion collisions quantum field systems time phenomena include reheating after inflation resonance energy small part spectrum non - thermal condition study systems describe phase transitions thermal fluctuations between classical minima non - perturbative approximation schemes needed high temperature approximations classical approximation@xcite hartree gaussian approximation@xcite assumes gaussian density matrix information in 1- 2-point functions higher point functions factorised using wick s theorem hartree approximation spatially constant mean field used improved version inhomogeneous configurations studied in scalar @xmath1 theory @xmath2 dimensions gaussian approximation expand operator field in mode functions @xmath4 time - independent @xmath5 @xmath6 satisfy commutation relations @xmath7 free thermal system @xmath8 bose - einstein form @xmath9 plane waves normalisation heisenberg equations of motions in gaussian approximation_mode large @xmath10 approximation leads to @xmath11 chose not use large @xmath10 avoid problems with goldstone bosons in @xmath2 dimensions@xmath12 \phi(x , t ) = 0{eq : eom_phi } \mbox\partial_t^2 - \triangle + \mu^2 + 3 \lambda \phi^2(x , t ) + 3 \sigma(x , t ) \mbox f_\alpha(x , t ) = 0 {eq : eom_mode}\end{aligned} @xmath13 effective hamiltonian leads equations system equilibrate classically @xmath14 timescale larger processes initial - conditions specify initial fields conjugate momenta @xmath15 initial gaussian density matrix averaging runs build non - gaussian density matrices general initial conditions time evolution evaluated with gaussian density matrices mean field zero - temperature minimum energy in momentum modes @xmath16 @xmath17 s random phases @xmath18 order @xmath19 average over runs 10 - 20 quantum modes equal to zero - temperature vacuum form : @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath19 zero - temperature mass @xmath22 size system system computer discretise on space - time latticelimit of spatial lattice spacing @xmath23 to zero mode sum @xmath24 equations motion diverging fixed by mass renormalisation : @xmath25 thermalisation if @xmath26 small system not from equilibrium interaction mode functions with inhomogeneous mean field scattering of particles thermalise thermal bose - einstein distribution definition of particle number needed free thermal system 2-point functions read : @xmath27 define @xmath28 and @xmath29 similar coarsening measured 2-point functions over initial conditions time interval space fig . plotted typical run @xmath30 lattice points size @xmath31 @xmath32 ) spatial averages mean field energy densities function of time energy mean field going to modes with timescale 100 in mass units total energy conserved to few percent energy staying in mean field around 20% more than expected classical equipartition around @xmath33 for @xmath30 mode functions fig : distrib plot calculated particle numbers averaging over space 5 oscillation periods 10 configurations left situation plotted at shorter times right larger times low momenta bose - einstein distribution emergingzero mode deviations runs at energy density show similar results faster thermalisation large times deviations from straight line show up as signs of classical equipartition strong coupling long times emergence of offset chemical potential from particle conservation checks with initial conditions show thermalisation according bose - einstein distribution hartree ensemble approximation inhomogeneous fields thermalisation distribution in low momentum modes time - scales depend on size coupling energy density signs classical equilibration occur at timescales larger bose - einstein thermalisation high values influence processes with intermediate timescale grigoriev d. rubakov , v. nucl . * b299 * , 67 - 78 ( 1988 ) aarts bonini wetterich ` hep - ph/0007357 ` mihaila athan cooper dawson habib s hep - ph/0003105 ` | 0.265985 | 1,601 | 830 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,565 | we present results from electroweak precision measurements at cdf .
these include the measurement of the @xmath0 boson rapidity distribution using di - electron events , the @xmath1 boson charge asymmetry measurement in the electron - neutrino decay and the direct measurement of the @xmath1 boson mass and width in both the electron - neutrino and muon - neutrino decay channels . | at the tevatron , @xmath1 and @xmath0 bosons are predominantly produced through quark - antiquark annihilation within the colliding proton and anti - proton beams .
the bosons decay into two fermions which , due to their large mass , typically have a high momentum in the direction transverse to the beam .
the @xmath1 and @xmath0 boson decay channels , where the charged lepton is an electron or muon , have clean experimental signatures with low background contamination and can therefore be utilized for @xmath1 and @xmath0 boson precision measurements .
events with a @xmath0 boson interference are indistinguishable from pure z exchange . for the remainder of this document we use @xmath0 boson to represent z/@xmath2 , including interference . ]
are identified by the detection of two charged leptons , each with high transverse momentum .
the electron energy is measured with the electromagnetic calorimeter and the muon momentum with the cdf central drift chamber .
@xmath1 boson events are identified by one high transverse momentum charged lepton and one high transverse momentum neutrino .
since the neutrino does not interact with the detector , its existence is inferred by the transverse momentum imbalance in the detector .
we describe four recent measurements from cdf .
two that constrain the parton distribution function of the proton , the @xmath1 boson charge asymmetry and the @xmath0 boson rapidity measurements and two @xmath1 boson precision measurements of the @xmath1 boson mass and width .
on average the @xmath3(@xmath4 ) quark carries a higher fraction of the ( anti)proton s momentum than the @xmath5(@xmath6 ) quark , thus a @xmath7(@xmath8 ) produced via a @xmath9(@xmath10 ) annihilation will tend to be boosted along the ( anti)proton beam .
this results in a non - zero forward - backward @xmath1 boson asymmetry , defined as : @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the @xmath1 boson rapidity and @xmath13 is the differential cross section for @xmath7 or @xmath8 boson production .
a measurement of @xmath14 is sensitive to the ratio of @xmath3 and @xmath5 quark components of the protons parton distribution functions ( pdf ) .
since the longitudinal neutrino momentum is not known , a measurement of the electron or muon charge asymmetry , rather than @xmath14 , has traditionally been made .
this distribution is a convolution of @xmath14 and the @xmath15 asymmetry from @xmath1 boson decays and the two asymmetries tend to cancel at large pseudorapidities . in this analysis @xcite , using 1 fb@xmath16 of @xmath17 data , @xmath14 is extracted by constraining @xmath18 to its measured value , giving two possible solutions , each receiving a probability weight according to the decay structure and @xmath19 . the measured @xmath1 boson charge asymmetry is compared to the prediction from pdfs in figure [ wcharge ] using nlo cteq6.1 m @xcite ( left ) and nnlo mrst 2006 @xcite ( right ) .
the respective pdf uncertainties are shown with shaded bands .
given the small experimental uncertainties this measurement will help to constrain pdfs in future fits .
boson charge asymmetry and theoretical predictions from nlocteq6.1 ( left ) and nnlo mrst 2006 ( right ) , with their associated pdf uncertainties . ]
boson charge asymmetry and theoretical predictions from nlocteq6.1 ( left ) and nnlo mrst 2006 ( right ) , with their associated pdf uncertainties . ]
@xmath0 boson production at the tevatron proceeds predominantly through annihilation of a @xmath3 ( or @xmath5 ) quark in the proton and a @xmath4 ( or @xmath6 ) quark in the anti - proton .
the two partons carry momentum fractions @xmath20 and @xmath21 . at leading order ( lo ) ,
the momentum fraction @xmath20 ( @xmath21 ) carried by the two partons are related to the rapidity ( @xmath22 ) of the @xmath0 boson via the relation : @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the center of mass energy and @xmath25 is the mass of the @xmath0 bosons .
thus a measurement of @xmath26 places constraints on the proton pdfs .
in particular , the high rapidity region probes both the high and low @xmath27 regions of the pdfs .
cdf has made a measurement of @xmath26 using 2.1 fb@xmath16 of @xmath28 data with @xmath29@xmath30@xmath29 @xmath31 2.8 .
this measurement has recently been included in fits by the mstw collaboration @xcite and boson rapidity distribution @xcite . ]
boson rapidity distribution @xcite . ]
figure [ zrapidity ] shows the results of the nnlo fit .
the data are well fitted , particularly when the systematic uncertainties are taken into account .
there is evidence of a slight excess of data over theory at high rapidity .
the @xmath1 boson mass receives self - energy corrections due to vacuum fluctuations involving virtual particles .
thus the @xmath1 boson mass probes the particle spectrum in nature , including particles that have yet to be observed directly . in order to constrain the higgs boson mass
, we need to account for the radiative corrections to @xmath18 due to the dominant top - bottom quark loop diagrams . for fixed values of other inputs , the current uncertainty on the top quark mass , @xmath32=173.1@xmath331.3 gev/@xmath34 @xcite corresponds to an uncertainty in its @xmath1 boson mass correction of 8 mev/@xmath34 .
the current world average from direct measurements at lep @xcite and tevatron @xcite yield a world average boson mass measurement @xmath35 @xmath36 80401@xmath3343 mev/@xmath34 @xcite .
the gfitter collaboration subsequently computed a new world average of 80399@xmath3323 mev/@xmath34 @xcite .
] of 80398@xmath3325 mev/@xmath34 .
it is clearly profitable to reduce the @xmath1 boson mass uncertainty further as a means of constraining the higgs boson mass .
the current one - sided 95% c.l .
upper limit from indirect electroweak constraints is @xmath37@xmath31163 gev / c@xmath38 @xcite . at the tevatron ,
the @xmath1 boson mass is extracted from a template fit to the jacobian edge of the transverse mass distribution , defined as @xmath39)}$ ] , where @xmath40 is the transverse momentum of the charged lepton and @xmath41 is the inferred neutrino transverse momentum .
a fast monte carlo simulation is used to model the lineshape of the template distributions , accounting for the detector response , resolution and acceptance effects .
we constrain these important detector and physics effects by control samples and calculations which determine the precision of the measurement of @xmath35 .
examples of the effects that need to be rigorously studied , extracted and modeled , include the tracker momentum scale and resolution , the calorimeter energy response , scale and resolution , the intrinsic @xmath1 boson transverse momentum , internal qed radiation and the proton parton distribution functions ( pdfs ) . using 200 pb@xmath16 of data , cdf combines the measurement in the muon and electron decay channel and obtains @xmath35=80413@xmath3334(stat)@xmath3334(syst ) mev/@xmath34 @xcite @xcite .
figure [ wmass ] on the left shows the transverse mass fit for the muon decay channel .
right : invariant mass fit in the di - muon decay channel using 2.3 fb@xmath42 . ] measurement .
right : invariant mass fit in the di - muon decay channel using 2.3 fb@xmath42 . ] many of the systematic uncertainties in this measurement scale with the statistics of the control samples used to calibrate the detector and can therefore be improved with an analysis of the larger datasets in hand .
additionally , improvements in the production and decay model such as improved pdf fits are likely to further reduce the overall systematic uncertainty on future measurements of @xmath35 .
cdf has begun analyzing an over ten times larger data sample with an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb@xmath16 , as can be seen in the @xmath0 boson mass fit on the right side of figure [ wmass ] .
studies in progress confirm that many of the systematic uncertainties scale with luminosity as expected and we look forward to an updated @xmath35 measurement with a precision better than the current world average of 25 mev / c@xmath38 .
the @xmath1 boson width is known within the standard model to an extremely high precision of 0.1% , thus an accurate experimental measurement is desirable to test this prediction .
the measurement technique is very similar to the extraction of the @xmath1 boson mass , but instead of fitting the jacobian edge , the fit is performed in the tail region 90 @xmath31 @xmath43 @xmath31 200 gev / c@xmath38 of the transverse mass distribution , where the gaussian detector resolution falls off more quickly compared to the @xmath1 boson breit - wigner lineshape .
cdf uses 350 @xmath44 analyzing the electron and muon decay channels to measure the @xmath1 boson width @xcite .
figure [ wwidth ] shows the transverse mass fits for @xmath17 events .
right : comparison with other tevatron measurements and lep-2 . ]
right : comparison with other tevatron measurements and lep-2 . ]
the results of the muon and electron decay channel are combined to give the final result @xmath45 = 2032 @xmath33 73 mev / c@xmath38 , the world s most precise measurement , which is in good agreement with the standard model prediction of 2091 @xmath33 2 mev / c@xmath38 @xcite .
the large tevatron datasets of @xmath1 and @xmath0 bosons with their clean decays to leptonic final states allow for a rich electroweak physics program .
the cdf @xmath1 boson charge asymmetry and @xmath0 boson rapidity measurements improve the constraints on proton pdfs , which in turn are important inputs to precision measurements of the @xmath1 boson mass and @xmath1 boson width .
the anticipated more precise determination of the @xmath1 boson mass from cdf is essential for a further constraint of the higgs boson mass and will test the standard model with higher precision .
i would like to thank my cdf collaborators , especially those whose work went into the results presented here at the beautiful lake louise winter institute . | tevatron @xmath1 bosons produced through quark - antiquark annihilation proton anti - proton beams bosons decay into fermions large mass high momentum transverse beam @xmath1 boson decay channels charged lepton electron or muon clean experimental signatures low background contamination for boson precision measurements @xmath0 boson interference from pure z exchange @xmath0 boson z/@xmath2 interference identified by detection two charged leptons high transverse momentum electron energy measured electromagnetic calorimeter muon momentum cdf central drift chamber @xmath1 boson events identified by one high momentum charged lepton one neutrino neutrino existence inferred by transverse momentum imbalance detector four measurements from cdf distribution boson charge asymmetry boson rapidity boson precision measurements @xmath3(@xmath4 ) quark carries higher anti)proton s momentum than @xmath5 ) quark @xmath7( ) produced via @xmath9 ) annihilation boosted along anti)proton beamresults non - zero forward - backward @xmath1 boson asymmetry defined @xmath11 @xmath12 boson rapidity differential cross section for @xmath7 or boson production measurement @xmath14 sensitive to ratio @xmath3 @xmath5 quark components protons parton distribution functions longitudinal neutrino momentum known measurement electron muon charge asymmetry distribution convolution @xmath14 @xmath15 asymmetry from @xmath1 boson decays asymmetries cancel at large pseudorapidities@xmath16 data @xmath14 extracted constraining @xmath18 to measured value two solutions each probability weight decay structure @xmath19 measured @xmath1 boson charge asymmetry compared to prediction pdfs figure using nlo cteq6.1 m @xcite nnlo mrst 2006 pdf uncertainties shown with shaded bands small experimental uncertainties measurement constrain pdfs future fits boson charge asymmetry theoretical predictions from nlocteq6.1 nnlo mrst 2006 pdf uncertainties@xmath0 boson production at tevatron through annihilation @xmath3 quark proton @xmath4 quark anti - proton two partons carry momentum fractions @xmath20 @xmath21 momentum fraction related to rapidity @xmath22 @xmath0 boson via relation @xmath24 center mass energy @xmath25 mass @xmath0 bosons measurement of @xmath26 constraints on proton pdfs high rapidity region probes high low @xmath27 regions pdfs measurement @xmath26 using 2.1 fb@xmath16 @xmath28 data with @xmath29 2.8 measurement included in mstw collaboration @xcite boson rapidity distribution results nnlo fit data well fitted systematic uncertainties slight excess of data over theory at high rapidity @xmath1 boson mass receives self - energy corrections due to vacuum fluctuations virtual particles probes particle spectrum constrain higgs boson mass account for radiative corrections to @xmath18 due to dominant top - bottom quark loop diagramsfixed values uncertainty top quark mass @xmath32=173.1@xmath331.3 gev/@xmath34 uncertainty @xmath1 boson mass correction 8 mev/@xmath34 world average measurements lep @xcite tevatron yield boson mass @xmath35 80401@xmath3343 mev/@xmath34 collaboration computed average 80399@xmath3323 mev/@xmath34 80398@xmath3325 mev/@xmath34 profitable reduce @xmath1 boson mass uncertainty higgs boson mass 95% c.l. upper limit electroweak constraints @xmath37@xmath31163 gev@xmath38 @xcite tevatron @xmath1 boson mass extracted template jacobian edge transverse mass distribution @xmath39) @xmath40 momentum charged lepton inferred neutrino momentum monte carlo simulation lineshape template distributions detector response resolution acceptance effects constrain detector physics effects control samples calculations precision measurement @xmath35 effects tracker momentum scale resolution calorimeter energy response intrinsic @xmath1 boson transverse momentum internal qed radiation proton parton distribution functions200 pb@xmath16 data cdf combines muon electron decay channel obtains @xmath35=80413@xmath3334(stat)(syst ) mev/@xmath34 @xcite figure shows transverse mass fit muon decay channel invariant mass fit di - muon decay channel 2.3 fb@xmath42 2.3 systematic uncertainties scale with statistics control samples improved larger datasets improvements production decay model improved fits reduce systematic uncertainty future measurements @xmath35 cdf analyzing ten times larger data sample integrated luminosity 2.3 fb@xmath16 @xmath0 boson mass fit studies confirm systematic uncertainties scale with luminosity look forward updated @xmath35 measurement precision better than world average 25 mev / c@xmath38 @xmath1 boson width known high precision 0.1% accurate experimental measurement desirable test prediction measurement technique similar extraction @xmath1 boson mass fit tail region 90 @xmath31 @xmath43 @xmath31 200 gev / c@xmath38 transverse mass distribution gaussian detector resolution falls off quickly @xmath1 boson breit - wigner lineshapecdf uses 350 @xmath44 electron muon decay channels @xmath1 boson width shows transverse mass @xmath17 events comparison tevatron measurements lep-2 results muon electron decay combined final result @xmath45 = 2032 @xmath33 73 mev /@xmath38 precise measurement standard model prediction 2091 @xmath33 2 mev /@xmath38 @xcite large tevatron datasets @xmath1 @xmath0 bosons clean decays rich electroweak physics program cdf @xmath1 boson charge asymmetry @xmath0 boson rapidity measurements improve constraints proton pdfs precision measurements @xmath1 boson mass width precise determination @xmath1 boson mass cdf essential constraint higgs boson mass standard model higher precision cdf collaborators beautiful lake louise winter institute | 0.352577 | 2,461 | 1,301 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,568 | in the present paper , ito formula and tanaka formula for a special kind of symmetric random walk in the complex plane are studied .
the random walk is called _ parisian walk _ , and its _ local time _ is defined to be the number of exit from some regions . | let @xmath0 be an i.i.d . sequence with @xmath1 , where we denote @xmath2 .
the filtration generated by @xmath3 will be denoted by @xmath4 .
an @xmath5-adapted complex valued process @xmath6 is called * parisian * ( walk ) if ( i ) it is a martingale starting from a point in @xmath7 \equiv \ { a + b \zeta : a , b \in \mathbb{z } \ } $ ] , and ( ii ) @xmath8 for all @xmath9 .
thus , a parisian walk is a random walk on @xmath10 $ ] .
note that there are a lot of parisian walks as functions of @xmath11 , but the law is unique up to the initial point .
$ ] .,title="fig:",width=207,height=185 ] $ ] .,title="fig:",width=215,height=185 ]
we classify the points in @xmath10 $ ] as @xmath12 @xmath13 further we define _ closure _ of @xmath14 and @xmath15 , respectively , as @xmath16 in this paper .
_ local time _ of a parisian walk is defined to be the number of exit from @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 .
more precisely , we set @xmath20 for @xmath21 and * local time * @xmath22 is defined by @xmath23 . in addition
, an @xmath24-martingale @xmath25 with @xmath26 and @xmath27 will be called * simple * ( walk ) .
of course , the law of simple walks is unique up to the initial points . in this paper
, we present the following [ 0304152131p ] for a parisian walk @xmath28 , @xmath29 is a simple walk . here , @xmath30 is the graph distance from @xmath31 in @xmath32 $ ] , namely it is the length of the shortest path from @xmath31 . * remark .
* our results heavily rely on the arguments found in fujita s paper @xcite on 1-dimensional random walks .
we begin with the following lemma . [ 0304301706p ] let @xmath28 be a parisian walk .
then the two dimensional process @xmath33 enjoys martingale representation property ; every complex valued @xmath24-martingale is represented as a stochastic integral with respect to @xmath33 .
denote @xmath34 for @xmath35 .
fix @xmath9 and set @xmath36 for @xmath37 .
then we have @xmath38 = 1 $ ] if @xmath39 and @xmath40 otherwise because of the martingale property and of the fact that @xmath41 .
therefore @xmath42 forms an orthonormal basis ( onb ) of @xmath43 since @xmath44 .
for an adapted @xmath25 , expanding @xmath45 with respect to this onb and denoting @xmath46 = x_s $ ] , we have @xmath47 by summing up the above equation , we obtain the doob decomposition of @xmath48 , and this completes the proof . * remark . *
the above lemma can be easily extended to general unit root cases .
the point here is that parisian walk is the right discrete analogue of planer brownian motion .
let @xmath6 be a parisian walk , and let @xmath49 be a complex valued function on @xmath7 $ ] .
then we have the following formula , which would correspond to an it s formula in @xmath24 . for @xmath50 , we have @xmath51 as in the expression ( [ 0304112126p ] ) , @xmath52 for some @xmath53-measurable @xmath54 and @xmath55 . on the set of @xmath56 , @xmath57 , and @xmath58
respectively , we have @xmath59 solving ( [ 0304112135p ] ) in terms of @xmath60 , we obtain ( [ 0304112136p ] ) .
for a parisian walk @xmath28 , set @xmath61 then , we have the following * remark . * as we have seen in the proof of lemma [ 0304301706p ] , @xmath28 and @xmath73 are mutually orthogonal martingale so that , after taking appropriate scaling limit , @xmath28 converges to a so - called _ planer _ brownian motion .
then , we can prove the standard it s formula from our it s formula ( [ 0304112136p ] ) , noting that ( [ 0304112136p ] ) can be rewritten as follows if @xmath49 is real valued .
@xmath74 where we have set @xmath75 so that @xmath76 corresponds to the _ discrete laplacian _ operator in the context of random walks on graphs , and @xmath77 , which corresponds to a _ differential _ operator on @xmath78 $ ] . | @xmath0 i.i sequence with @xmath1 denote @xmath2 filtration by @xmath3 denoted by @xmath4 @xmath5-adapted complex valued process @xmath6 called * parisian * ( walk ) martingale starting from point in @xmath7 @xmath8 for @xmath9 parisian walk random walk on @xmath10 parisian walks functions of @xmath11 law unique to initial point classify points in @xmath10 as @xmath12 @xmath13 define of @xmath14 @xmath15 as @xmath16 local time of parisian walk number of exit from @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 set @xmath20 for @xmath21 local time @xmath22 defined by @xmath23 @xmath24-martingale @xmath25 with @xmath26 @xmath27 called * simple * ( walk ) law of simple walks unique up to initial points parisian walk @xmath28 @xmath29 simple walk @xmath30 graph distance from @xmath31 @xmath32 length of shortest path from @xmath31results rely on arguments fujita s paper @xcite on 1-dimensional random walks begin lemma let @xmath28 be parisian walk two dimensional process @xmath33 enjoys martingale representation complex @xmath24-martingale stochastic integral @xmath33 denote @xmath34 for @xmath35 fix @xmath9 set @xmath36 for @xmath37 @xmath38 = 1 $ @xmath39 @xmath40 martingale property @xmath42 forms orthonormal basis of @xmath43 since @xmath44 adapted @xmath25 expanding @xmath45 denoting @xmath46 = x_s $ @xmath47 obtain doob decomposition of @xmath48 completes proof lemma extended to general unit root cases parisian walk analogue of brownian motion let @xmath6 be parisian walk @xmath49 complex valued function on @xmath7 $ formula @xmath24 @xmath50 @xmath51 expression 0304112126p ] @xmath52 @xmath53-measurable @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath59 solving 0304112135p @xmath60 obtain ( [ 0304112136p ]parisian walk @xmath28 set @xmath61 following remark proof lemma [ 0304301706p ] @xmath28 @xmath73 orthogonal martingale after scaling limit @xmath28 converges planer _ brownian motion prove standard formula from formula ( [ 0304112136p ] ) 0304112136p rewritten if @xmath49 real valued @xmath74 set @xmath75 @xmath76 corresponds discrete laplacian _ operator random walks graphs @xmath77 corresponds differential operator @xmath78 | 0.180354 | 1,127 | 620 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,583 | using high statistics samples of charged current interactions , miniboone reports a model independent measurement of the single charged pion production to quasi - elastic cross section ratio on mineral oil without corrections for pion re - interactions in the target nucleus @xcite .
the result is provided as a function of neutrino energy in the range 0.4 gev < e < 2.4 gev with 11% precision in the region of highest statistics .
address = department of physics and astronomy + louisiana state university + baton rouge , la 70803 | future neutrino experiments will operate in the few - gev neutrino energy range , where quasielastic scattering ( ccqe ) and pion production channels are dominant interactions .
the charged current pion production interactions account for the biggest background for the neutrino oscillation disappearance measurements .
recently , three experiments ( k2k @xcite , miniboone @xcite and sciboone @xcite ) have presented results for cc pion production cross section in the few - gev neutrino energy region on nuclear targets . with high statistic samples it is possible to determine neutrino cross sections in this region with better precision than data from previous experiments@xcite . here , we present the ratio of cross sections of the charged current single pion production ( @xmath0 ) and quasielastic scattering ( @xmath1 ) as obtained from the miniboone experiment . in this measurement
the largest sources of uncertainty coming from the neutrino flux determination largely cancels out .
the booster neutrino beam at fermilab provides a neutrino source which is particularly well - suited to make this measurement ; about 40% of @xmath2 neutrino interactions in miniboone are expected to be ccqe and 24% @xmath3 .
the beam itself is composed of 93.6% @xmath2 with a mean energy of about 800 mev and 5.9% ( 0.5% ) @xmath4 ( @xmath5 ) contamination @xcite .
the neutrinos are detected in the miniboone detector @xcite , a 12.2 m diameter spherical tank filled with 818 tons of undoped mineral oil located 541 m downstream of the beryllium target . at the energies relevant to this analysis
, the products of the interactions produce primarily cerenkov light with a small fraction of scintillation light @xcite .
the light is detected by 1280 8-inch photomultiplier tubes ( pmts ) which line the miniboone inner tank .
this inner tank region is optically isolated from a surrounding veto region , instrumented with 240 pmts , that serves to reject incoming cosmic rays and partially contained neutrino interactions .
neutrino interactions within the detector are simulated with the v3 nuance event generator @xcite .
ccqe interactions on carbon are generated using the relativistic fermi gas model @xcite tuned to better describe the observed distribution of @xmath6 interactions in miniboone @xcite .
resonant @xmath7 events are simulated using the rein and sehgal ( r - s ) model @xcite , as implemented in nuance with an axial mass @xmath8 .
the angular distribution of the decaying pions in the center of mass of the recoiling resonance follows the helicity amplitudes of @xcite . in miniboone ,
@xmath9 of @xmath7 production is predicted to occur via the @xmath10 resonance , but 17 higher mass resonances and their interferences , as well as a nonresonant background that accounts for roughly 6% of @xmath7 events , are also included in the model .
coherently produced @xmath7 events are generated using the r - s model @xcite with the r - s absorptive factor replaced by nuance s pion absorption model and the overall cross section rescaled to reproduce miniboone s recent measurement of neutral current coherent @xmath11 production @xcite .
coherent @xmath12 production is predicted to compose less than 6% of the miniboone @xmath7 sample due to the small coherent cross section @xcite and the dominance of the @xmath13 resonance .
a geant3-based detector model simulates the response of the detector to particles produced in these neutrino interactions .
the @xmath6 and @xmath7 reconstruction requires a detailed model of light production and propagation in the tank to predict the charge distribution for a given vertex and muon angle .
the muon vertex , track angle , and energy , are found with a maximal likelihood fit , with the energy being determined from the total tank charge @xcite . in the case of @xmath7 events , only one track is reconstructed and assumed to be a @xmath14 .
the neutrino energy for both samples is reconstructed from the observed muon kinematics , treating the interaction as a 2-body collision and assuming that the target nucleon is at rest inside the nucleus : @xmath15 here @xmath16 is the mass of the proton , @xmath17 is the mass of the muon , @xmath18 is the mass of the neutron in @xmath6 events and of the @xmath19 in @xmath7 , @xmath20 is the reconstructed angle of the muon with respect to the beam axis ( in the lab frame ) , and @xmath21 is the reconstructed muon energy .
the cross - section for a neutrino interaction is defined as : @xmath22 where n is the true number of events of type x(@xmath7 or @xmath6 ) , @xmath23 is the number of nuclear targets in the detector , and @xmath24 is the flux of incident neutrinos .
because the incident neutrino flux and the number of nuclear targets are fixed properties of the beam and the detector ( i.e. independent of the process we are considering ) , @xmath23 and @xmath25 must be the same for both processes .
therefore we can write @xmath26 with all the correction terms put together , the cross section ratio in each energy bin @xmath27 is : @xmath28 where the subscript @xmath27 runs over bins in true neutrino energy , subscript @xmath29 indexes bins in reconstructed neutrino energy , @xmath30 denotes the number of events passing cuts for @xmath31 , @xmath6 , @xmath32 denotes the signal fraction , @xmath33 denotes the cut efficiency , and @xmath34 is a neutrino energy unsmearing matrix that acts on a reconstructed distribution to return the true distribution .
to map reconstructed to true energy , we form a migration matrix @xmath35 representing the number of mc events in bin @xmath27 of reconstructed energy and bin @xmath29 of true energy .
we then normalize each reconstructed energy bin to unity to obtain an unsmearing matrix .
this is equivalent to a bayesian approach discussed in @xcite ; it differs from the standard matrix inversion method in that the resulting unsmearing matrix is biased by the mc distribution used to generate it .
we account for this in our uncertainties by including a variation in the mc distribution used to generate the matrix . because we have good data / mc agreement
, this effect is small .
the advantage of this method is that it avoids the problems of numerical instability and the magnification of statistical errors which occur in matrix inversion .
this unsmearing procedure also proved insensitive to variations in neutrino energy reconstruction , confirming that it performs as intended .
for our primary measurement , we define @xmath7 signal as events with exactly one @xmath14 and one @xmath12 escaping the struck nucleus ( which we call @xmath7-like events ) and ccqe signal as those with exactly one @xmath14 and no pions ( @xmath6-like events ) .
both event classes may include any number of protons or neutrons , but no other types of hadrons .
the observed cross section ratio is then defined as the ratio of @xmath7-like to @xmath6-like events and thus has not been corrected for re - interactions in the struck nucleus .
the systematic uncertainties on the cross section ratio arise from five main sources : the neutrino flux ( which largely cancels in the ratio ) , the neutrino interaction cross sections ( which affect the background predictions ) , the target nucleon momentum distribution ( which accounts for the model dependence of our unfolded neutrino energy ) , hadron re - interactions in the detector , and the detector simulation ( which describes light propagation in the oil ) . in the region of highest statistics ( about 1 gev ) , there is roughly an 8% fractional error on the ratio resulting from hadron re - scattering in the detector , 6% from neutrino cross sections , 4% from the detector simulation , 2% from the nucleon momentum distribution , 2% from the neutrino flux , and 2% from the statistics of the two samples . the cross section ratio reported by all prior experimental measurements @xcite has been one in which the effects of final state interactions ( fsi ) in the target nucleus have been removed using mc or deuterium was used as a target . solely for the purpose of comparison ,
we now extract a similarly corrected value .
the fsi - corrected ratio is defined as the ratio of @xmath7 to @xmath6 events at the initial vertex and before any hadronic re - interactions .
thus , the signal fractions and cut efficiencies for the fsi - corrected ratio include corrections for intra - nuclear hadron re - scattering based on the mc s model for nuclear effects @xcite .
the measurement proceeds exactly as for the observed ratio , except that now we define @xmath7 and @xmath6 , rather than @xmath7-like and @xmath6-like , events as signal for the respective samples . here
we limit our comparison to those experiments which reported both @xmath6 and @xmath7 cross sections , using the same energy bins for each of these interactions , so as to facilitate comparison with our measured @xmath36 ratio .
our result agrees with both anl , which used a deuterium target , and k2k , which used @xmath37 . in order to make this comparison ,
the miniboone and k2k results have been re - scaled to an isoscalar target . to perform this correction
, we rescale the ratio by a factor of @xmath38 , where @xmath39 is the ratio of neutrons to protons in the target and @xmath40 is the fraction of @xmath12 production that is predicted ( by mc ) to occur on protons .
the resulting scaling factor is 0.80 for miniboone ; for k2k we use the factor of 0.89 provided in @xcite .
the results have not been corrected for their differing nuclear targets nor for the application of explicit invariant mass requirements ( although the latter are similar ) .
anl used an explicit cut on invariant mass w < 1.4 gev @xcite .
while no invariant mass cut is used in this analysis , the miniboone spectrum is such that @xmath7 events occur only in the region @xmath41 ; similarly , k2k s measurement covers the region w < 2 gev @xcite .
the dominant reason for the difference between the ratios presented in figure 1 is intra - nuclear pion absorption in @xmath7 events , which cause these events to look ccqe - like . as a result of @xmath12 absorption ,
a significant number of @xmath7 events migrate from @xmath3 sample to @xmath6-like one .
thus , the fsi - corrected ratio , is 15% to 30% higher than the observed ratio in our energy range . in summary
, miniboone has measured the ratio of @xmath7-like to @xmath6-like events for neutrinos with energy @xmath42 incident on @xmath43 .
this is the first time such a ratio has been reported .
additionally , the ratio of the @xmath7 and @xmath6 cross sections at the vertex has been extracted using mc to remove the effects of final state interactions , in order to facilitate comparison with previous experimental measurements .
the results are summarized in table i. the measured ratios agree with prediction @xcite and previous data @xcite . | neutrino experiments few - gev neutrino energy range quasielastic scattering pion production channels dominant charged current pion production interactions background neutrino oscillation disappearance measurements three experiments k2k miniboone sciboone results cc pion production cross section few - gev neutrino energy region nuclear targets high statistic samples determine neutrino cross sections better precision ratio of cross sections charged current single pion production quasielastic scattering miniboone experiment uncertainty from neutrino flux determination booster neutrino beam at fermilab provides neutrino source 40% @xmath2 neutrino interactions ccqe 24% @xmath3 beam 93.6% @xmath2 mean energy 800 mev 5.9% @xmath4 contamination @xcite neutrinos detected in miniboone detector @xcite 12.2 m diameter tank 818 tons of undoped mineral oil 541 m downstream beryllium target interactions produce cerenkov light small fraction scintillation light light detected by 1280 8-inch photomultiplier tubes miniboone inner tankinner tank region isolated from veto region instrumented with 240 pmts cosmic rays neutrino interactions neutrino interactions simulated with v3 nuance event generator @xcite ccqe interactions on carbon generated relativistic fermi gas model @xmath6 interactions resonant @xmath7 events simulated rein sehgal - model axial mass @xmath8 distribution decaying pions resonance follows helicity amplitudes @xmath7 production via @xmath10 resonance 17 higher mass resonances interferences nonresonant background 6% @xmath7 events included produced @xmath7 events generated r - s model @xcite r - s absorptive factor replaced by nuance s pion absorption model cross section rescaled neutral current @xmath11 production @xmath12 production less than 6% of miniboone @xmath7 sample small coherent cross section dominance @xmath13 resonance geant3-based detector model simulates response to particles neutrino interactions @xmath6 @xmath7 reconstruction requires detailed model light production propagation charge distributionmuon vertex track angle energy found maximal likelihood fit energy determined from total tank charge @xcite @xmath7 events one track reconstructed @xmath14 neutrino energy both samples reconstructed from observed muon kinematics interaction 2-body collision target nucleon inside nucleus @xmath15 @xmath16 mass proton @xmath17 mass muon @xmath18 mass neutron @xmath6 @xmath20 reconstructed angle muon beam axis @xmath21 reconstructed muon energy cross - section for neutrino interaction defined as @xmath22 n number of events x@xmath7 or @xmath23 number nuclear targets detector @xmath24 flux of incident neutrinos incident neutrino flux number nuclear targets fixed properties beam detector independent of process @xmath23 @xmath25 must be same for both processeswrite @xmath26 correction terms cross section ratio energy bin @xmath27 : @xmath28 subscript @xmath27 runs over bins true neutrino energy @xmath29 indexes bins reconstructed neutrino energy @xmath30 events passing cuts @xmath31 @xmath32 signal fraction cut efficiency @xmath34 neutrino energy unsmearing matrix acts on reconstructed distribution return true distribution map reconstructed to true energy form migration matrix @xmath35 mc events bin @xmath27 reconstructed energy @xmath29 true energy normalize each reconstructed energy bin to unity unsmearing matrix equivalent to bayesian approach @xcite differs unsmearing matrix biased by mc distribution variation mc distribution good data / mc agreement effect small avoids numerical instability statistical errors matrix inversion unsmearing procedure insensitive to variations neutrino energy reconstruction performs as intended define @xmath7 signal one @xmath14 @xmath12 escaping struck nucleus @xmath7-like events ccqe signal one @xmath14 no pions @xmath6-like events event classes include protons or neutrons no other hadronsobserved cross section ratio defined as @xmath7-like to @xmath6-like events not corrected for re - interactions in struck nucleus uncertainties on arise from neutrino flux neutrino interaction cross sections target nucleon momentum distribution hadron re - interactions detector simulation highest statistics 1 gev 8% fractional error on ratio from hadron re - scattering 6% neutrino cross sections 4% detector simulation 2% nucleon momentum distribution 2% neutrino flux 2% from statistics of two samples cross section ratio reported by prior measurements @xcite effects of final state interactions in target nucleus removed using deuterium for comparison extract similarly corrected value fsi - corrected ratio defined as ratio of @xmath7 to @xmath6 events at initial vertex before hadronic re - interactions signal fractions cut efficiencies for include corrections for intra - nuclear hadron re - scattering based on mc s model effects @xcite measurement proceeds as define @xmath7 and @xmath6 events as signal for sampleslimit comparison to experiments @xmath6 @xmath7 cross sections same energy bins comparison @xmath36 ratio result agrees with anl k2k @xmath37 miniboone k2k results re - scaled to isoscalar target rescale ratio by factor @xmath38 @xmath39 ratio neutrons to protons @xmath40 @xmath12 production on protons scaling factor 0.80 for miniboone k2k 0.89 @xcite results not corrected for differing nuclear targets explicit invariant mass requirements anl explicit cut on invariant mass w < 1.4 gev @xcite no invariant mass cut miniboone spectrum @xmath7 events occur in region @xmath41 k2k s measurement covers region w < 2 gev @xcite difference ratios intra - nuclear pion absorption in @xmath7 events - like absorption @xmath7 events migrate from @xmath3 sample to @xmath6-like fsi - corrected ratio 15% to 30% higher than observed ratio energy range miniboone measured ratio @xmath7-like to @xmath6-like events for neutrinos with energy @xmath42 incident on @xmath43 first time ratio reportedratio @xmath7 @xmath6 cross sections vertex extracted mc remove effects final state interactions comparison previous measurements results summarized table i measured ratios agree with prediction previous data | 0.427524 | 2,502 | 1,306 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,585 | we discuss some aspects of forward jet production as a signature for small @xmath0 physics at thera energies .
@xmath1 department of theoretical physics , lund university , sweden , leif@thep.lu.se | the evolution of the parton densities at small @xmath0 is a very rich but complicated issue .
the steep rise of the structure function @xmath2 at small @xmath0 is explained by the presence of a huge gluon number density .
the pure dglap evolution equations , meant to describe the evolution of the parton densities as a function of @xmath3 , are able to reproduce the rise of @xmath2 provided the input starting distributions are chosen properly . figure [ ccfm_variables ] shows the pattern of qcd initial - state radiation in a small-@xmath0 dis event , together with labels for the kinematics .
the gluon splitting function @xmath4 is given by : @xmath5 where @xmath6 and @xmath7 ( see fig . [ ccfm_variables ] ) is the ratio of the energy fractions of successive branchings in the gluon chain and @xmath8 is virtuality of the @xmath9-channel gluon with @xmath10 . in dglap the @xmath8 dependence of all emissions in the gluon chain are simplified by the observation that at not too small @xmath0 the dominant part to the cross section comes from the region of phase space where @xmath8 is very small .
however if @xmath0 or @xmath11 becomes very small , the collinear ( small @xmath12 ) approximation of dglap may be inadequate .
this region is treated by the bfkl evolution equation , which keeps the full @xmath12 integration but approximates the gluon splitting function with the asymptotic form @xmath13 from a detailed analysis of interference effects in a gluon chain , it was found that the proper evolution variable is the angle of the emitted gluon , and not the virtuality @xmath8 as in the dglap approximation , nor @xmath11 as in the bfkl approximation .
this angular ordering resulted in the new , and more complicated , ccfm evolution , which reproduces the bfkl and dglap approximations in the small and large @xmath0 limits respectively .
the ccfm equation naturally interpolates between the two extremes .
however , in ccfm the gluon splitting function contains only the singular terms in @xmath11 : @xmath14 with @xmath15 being the non - sudakov form factor to regulate the @xmath16 singularity .
the non singular terms of the splitting function ( see eq.([pgg ] ) ) are not obtained within the ccfm approximation . whereas at hera energies ( @xmath17 gev ) the total cross section of deep inelastic scattering can be reasonably well described with the dglap evolution equations ,
measurements of specific features of the hadronic final state indicate clear deviations from a pure dglap scenario . the cross section at low @xmath0 and large @xmath3 for a high @xmath18 jet in the proton direction ( a forward jet ) has been advocated as a particularly sensitive measure of small @xmath0 parton dynamics @xcite .
if the forward jet has large energy ( @xmath19 ) the evolution from @xmath20 to small @xmath0 can be studied .
when @xmath21 there is no room for @xmath3 evolution left and the dglap formalism predicts a rather small cross section in contrast to the bfkl / ccfm formalisms , which describe the evolution also in @xmath0 .
measurements performed at hera @xcite show that the prediction from the naive dglap formalism lies a factor @xmath22 below the data , whereas the data can be described by ccfm evolution equations @xcite .
the effect of new small @xmath0 parton dynamics is most clearly seen if the contribution from typical dglap dynamics is suppressed .
the forward jet production in deep inelastic scattering at small values of @xmath0 is one example of such a process .
however , the kinematics need to be investigated further .
typical event selection criteria at hera are : [ cols= " < " , ] the range in @xmath0 is typically @xmath23 .
the evolution takes place from the large @xmath20 down to the small @xmath0 with a typical range at hera energies of @xmath24 . in order to justify the use of an evolution equation ( instead of a fixed order calculation ) one would require at least 2 or more gluon emissions during the evolution . to roughly estimate the energy fractions @xmath25 of 3 gluon emissions between @xmath26 , one can assume that each gluon carries the same energy .
then the range of @xmath27 results in @xmath28 , which is far from being in the very small @xmath11 region , where the bfkl or ccfm approximations ( treating only the @xmath16 terms in the gluon splitting function ) are expected to be appropriate . in fig .
[ zval_fjet_hera ] we show the values of the splitting variable @xmath11 in events satisfying the forward jet criteria at hera energies obtained from the monte carlo generator @xcite . since the values of the splitting variable @xmath11 are indeed in the large @xmath11 region ( the majority has @xmath29 ) , it is questionable , whether the bfkl or ccfm evolution equations , including only the @xmath16 terms of the gluon splitting function , are already applicable . whereas the measurement at hera stops at @xmath30 , the available phase space at thera is enlarged by a factor of @xmath31 .
therefore the gluons along the chain will presumably have smaller @xmath11 values and the usage of the small @xmath0 evolution equations might be more justified . in fig .
[ zval_fjet_thera ] we show the @xmath11 values obtained from events satisfying the forward jet selection criteria at thera energies ( @xmath32 gev ) compared with the ones at hera energies ( @xmath33 gev ) .
the four plots correspond to different cuts on the minimum jet angle ( @xmath34 ) .
one clearly can observe , that the distribution of @xmath11 values becomes flat at small @xmath11 at thera energies and that the small @xmath11 values are no longer suppressed as in the hera kinematic region .
this clearly shows , that the application of small @xmath0 evolution equations at thera energies are justified and unavoidable , although the sensitivity to the treatment of large @xmath11 splittings does not completely go away . at hera
the forward jet cross section could be reasonably well described by including a resolved virtual photon contribution , because the phase space for small @xmath11 emissions at hera energies was relatively small .
the situation changes at thera energies : the phase space for small @xmath11 emissions is larger and effects from small @xmath0 evolution become more visible . in fig .
[ fig - fwdjet1 ] the cross section for forward jet production is shown as a function of @xmath0 for standard dglap prediction ( dotted ) , including in addition a contribution from resolved virtual photons ( dashed - dotted ) and the ccfm prediction ( dashed ) .
for comparison the prediction from ariadne@xcite is shown , which implements a semi - classical soft radiation model in a dipole cascade , and which currently gives the best overall description of small-@xmath0 hera data .
since the the available phase space at thera is enlarged by a factor of @xmath31 , the difference between the standard dglap - based calculation and the ccfm calculation is increased . moreover , at thera the ccfm approach predicts a larger cross section than the model with resolved virtual photon contributions added , and smaller cross section than ariadne , while all three models give comparable results at hera .
this gives a unique opportunity , not only to distinguish between the different approaches , but also to study details of the qcd cascade in a regime , where the new small-@xmath0 evolution equations should be appropriate . in fig .
[ fig - fwdjet2 ] the forward jet cross section is shown for different minimal jet angle cuts .
on the experimental side this requires complete acceptance both in the electron and proton direction down to the lowest possible angles . from the size of the cross section
@xmath35 one would like to reach at least @xmath36 for the forward jet measurement , but there are other reasons to ask even for @xmath37 . on the other hand ,
the luminosities needed for such measurements are moderate so that this question can be settled within one year of running at thera .
hera has conclusively shown the need to go beyond the standard dglap evolution equations in order to explain the data on small-@xmath0 final states .
the reach in @xmath0 is , however , not quite enough to really study details of the small-@xmath0 evolution to be able to distinguish between different approaches , such as the ccfm evolution , resolved virtual photons and the dipole cascade model . with the increased kinematical region available at thera
, this will become possible . the steeply rising cross section as @xmath0 gets smaller means that such measurements can be done even with moderate luminosity . on the other hand the demands on the forward coverage of the detector
is more critical ideally it should be possible to measure jets down to an angle of @xmath38 .
once a good understanding of the small-@xmath0 evolution is obtained , it should be possible to use the underlying @xmath39-factorization theorem in bfkl / ccfm , where observables are described in terms of process dependent off - shell matrix element and universal un - integrated parton densities , to make firm predictions of any other small-@xmath0 measurement , just as normal dglap parton densities and matrix elements are used today at large @xmath3 .
thera will be the only place where these un - integrated parton densities can be measured .
n. b. et al . , a comparison of deep - inelastic monte carlo event generators , in _ proceedings of the workshop on monte carlo generators for hera physics _ , edited by a. doyle , g. grindhammer , g. ingelman , h. jung ( , hamburg , 1999 ) , p. 10 . | evolution parton densities at small @xmath0 complicated steep rise structure function @xmath2 explained by huge gluon density dglap evolution equations reproduce rise @xmath2 input starting distributions chosen figure shows pattern qcd initial - state radiation in small-@xmath0 dis event labels kinematics gluon splitting function @xmath4 given by @xmath5 @xmath6 and @xmath7 ratio energy fractions branchings gluon chain @xmath8 virtuality @xmath9-channel gluon with @xmath10 @xmath8 dependence emissions gluon chain at small @xmath0 dominant part cross section from region phase space where @xmath8 small if @xmath0 or @xmath11 becomes small collinear small @xmath12 ) approximation dglap may inadequate region treated by bfkl evolution equation keeps full @xmath12 integration approximates gluon splitting function with asymptotic form @xmath13 analysis interference proper evolution variable is angle of emitted gluon not virtuality @xmath8angular ordering ccfm evolution reproduces bfkl dglap approximations in small large @xmath0 limits ccfm equation interpolates between extremes gluon splitting function contains singular terms in @xmath11 @xmath15 non - sudakov singularity non singular terms not obtained ccfm approximation hera energies cross section deep inelastic scattering described with dglap evolution equations hadronic indicate deviations from dglap scenario cross section at low @xmath0 large @xmath3 for high @xmath18 jet sensitive measure small @xmath0 parton dynamics forward jet large energy evolution from @xmath20 to small @xmath0 studied @xmath21 no room for @xmath3 evolution dglap formalism predicts small cross section bfkl / ccfm formalisms evolution measurements at hera @xcite prediction dglap formalism @xmath22 below data described by ccfm evolution equations effect new small @xmath0 parton dynamics seen if contribution dglap dynamics suppressed forward jet production in deep inelastic scattering at small values @xmath0 examplekinematics need event selection criteria at hera < range in @xmath0 typically @xmath23 evolution from large @xmath20 to small @xmath0 typical range at hera energies of @xmath24 evolution equation 2 or more gluon emissions estimate energy fractions @xmath25 of 3 gluon emissions between @xmath26 each gluon carries same energy range of @xmath27 results in @xmath28 from small @xmath11 region bfkl or ccfm approximations @xmath16 terms appropriate fig ._hera values splitting variable @xmath11 in events forward jet criteria at hera energies from monte carlo generator values in large @xmath11 region majority has @xmath29 questionable bfkl or ccfm evolution equations @xmath16 terms applicable measurement at hera stops at @xmath30 phase space at thera enlarged by @xmath31 gluons along chain have smaller @xmath11 values small @xmath0 evolution equations justified fig .zval_fjet_thera @xmath11 values from events forward jet selection at thera energies compared with hera four plots correspond different cuts on minimum jet angle @xmath34 ) distribution of @xmath11 values flat at small thera energies no suppressed hera application of small @xmath0 evolution equations at thera energies justified unavoidable sensitivity to treatment large @xmath11 splittings hera forward jet cross section resolved virtual photon contribution phase space for small emissions small changes at thera energies phase space larger effects small evolution more visible fig . cross section for forward jet production function of @xmath0 for standard dglap prediction including contribution from resolved virtual photons ccfm prediction prediction from ariadne@xcite implements semi - classical soft radiation model in dipole cascade best description of small-@xmath0 hera data phase space at thera enlarged by factor @xmath31 difference between standard dglap - based calculation and ccfm calculation increasedat thera ccfm approach predicts larger cross section than resolved virtual photon contributions smaller than ariadne all three models give comparable results hera unique opportunity to distinguish approaches study qcd cascade new small-@xmath0 evolution equations fig . forward jet cross section shown for minimal jet angle cuts requires acceptance electron and proton direction lowest angles size cross section @xmath35 reach @xmath36 for forward jet measurement other reasons ask for @xmath37 luminosities needed for measurements moderate question settled within one year at thera hera shown need to beyond standard dglap evolution equations explain data on small-@xmath0 final states reach in @xmath0 not enough to study evolution distinguish approaches ccfm evolution dipole cascade model increased kinematical region at thera possible rising cross section as @xmath0 smaller measurements done even with moderate luminosity demands on forward coverage detector critical measure jets down to angle of @xmath38 understanding small-@xmath0 evolution use @xmath39-factorization theorem bfkl ccfm process dependent off - shell matrix element un - integrated parton densities predictions small-@xmath0 measurement normal dglap parton densities matrix elements @xmath3 thera un - integrated parton densities measured n b. comparison deep - inelastic monte carlo event generators proceedings workshop monte carlo generators physics a. doyle g grindhammer ingelman h jung hamburg 1999 p. 10 | 0.350199 | 2,224 | 1,143 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,597 | we consider finite-@xmath0 electron - phonon coupling appropriate for a superconductor with a very short coherence length and local intersite pairs . from group
theoretical analyis we find that @xmath1phonons can couple to degenerate electronic states in la@xmath2sr@xmath3cuo@xmath4 and a jahn - teller - like distortion is found to be operative for @xmath5 and @xmath6-symmetry o states . experimentally observed anomalies in inelastic neutron scattering , esr and exafs are found to be consistent with such an interaction of the @xmath7 symmetry @xmath8point mode with the planar o p@xmath3 and p@xmath9 states .
the proposed interaction is found to naturally facilitate symmetry breaking associated with pairing and/or stripe formation .
[ theorem]acknowledgement [ theorem]algorithm [ theorem]axiom [ theorem]claim [ theorem]conclusion [ theorem]condition [ theorem]conjecture [ theorem]corollary [ theorem]criterion [ theorem]definition [ theorem]example [ theorem]exercise [ theorem]lemma [ theorem]notation [ theorem]problem [ theorem]proposition [ theorem]remark [ theorem]solution [ theorem]summary | the existence of local intersite pairs in cuprate superconductors is inferred from the very short coherence lengths in these materials , which is in turn determined from measurements of @xmath10 . given that the pair dimensions @xmath11 can not exceed the coherence length , i.e. @xmath12 , we may infer that any possible lattice distortions associated with pairing have a finite range , defined by the extent of the pair @xmath13 .
however , the particular form of the electron - phonon interaction leading to these distortions and particular type of phonon mode responsible for pairing should be determined from experiments . according to inelastic neutron scattering data
a large ( 30% ) anomaly in @xmath7 phonon mode corresponding to the ( @xmath14 ) direction has been observed in a number of doped cuprates ( but not in the parent compound)@xcite .
the observed anomaly takes place at an incomensurate wavevector and is suggested to be associated with pairing and/or stripe formation .
the electron phonon interaction can then be written in the form : @xmath15 where @xmath16 is a constant describing the strength of coupling , @xmath17defines the wavevector asociated with the interaction and its range in @xmath0-space , while @xmath18 defines its width . in this paper
we analyse the @xmath19 coupling of phonon modes with @xmath1using group theory applicable to la@xmath2sr@xmath3cuo@xmath4 and discuss the relevant phonon modes by examining the available experimental data from neutron diffraction , esr and exafs .
we find that the experimentally observed features can be described by the coupling of a @xmath7 - symmetry in - plane o - mode along the @xmath20 direction to holes occupying @xmath6 or @xmath5 - symmetry planar o states .
the brillouin zone ( bz ) corresponding to the tetragonal point group @xmath21 applicable for la@xmath2sr@xmath3cuo@xmath4 is shown in figure 1 . to consider local pairs and/or stripes forming along the cu - o bond direction or along 45@xmath22 to it , we need to consider the @xmath20 and the @xmath23 points , corresponding to the ( @xmath24 and ( @xmath25 directions respectively .
the special symmetry points ( @xmath26 and @xmath27 etc . ) give rise to commensurate stripes@xcite . before proceeding with analysis of the e - p coupling for the case of general @xmath28
, it should be pointed out since the symmetrised cross product of the representations at the @xmath29 point , @xmath30=[e_{g}\times e_{g}]=a_{1g}+b_{1g}+b_{2g}\ ] ] the electrons can couple only with @xmath31 modes ( there are no @xmath32 and @xmath33 at the @xmath29 point of la@xmath2sr@xmath3cuo@xmath4 ) .
( there are two such modes in @xmath21 and are associated either with apex oxygen o(2 ) ions or la ions . )
these do not lead to any symmetry breaking .
it follows that stripe formation or further symmetry breaking can not be associated with the @xmath29 point ( @xmath34 , but can only be _ associated with finite _ @xmath35 . for the case of tetragonal symmetry
, this corresponds to the @xmath36 and the @xmath23 points in the bz .
since the @xmath20 and @xmath23 points have a four pronged star , we propose the following form of coupling to electrons in single non - degenerate electronic states : @xmath37 where @xmath38 is the site label and @xmath39 where @xmath40 are the 4 wavevectors corresponding to the prongs of the star associated with stripe ( pair ) formation
. we should stress that in this case the nondegenerate electronic states are associated with @xmath41-orbitals of planar oxygens which transform as @xmath42 or @xmath43 .
the hamiltonian above on its own does not lead to symmetry breaking , but phase separation can in principle still take place as a result of competition of short - range attraction and long - range coulomb repulsion forces . however , the symmetry of both phases would be the same .
a more interesting case arises when two - fold degenerate levels ( for example the two @xmath5 states corresponding to the planar o @xmath44 and @xmath45 orbitals or the @xmath5 and @xmath6 states of the apical o ) interacts with @xmath46 phonons .
again , we are interested in the phonons which lead to symmetry breaking and allow the formation of stripes .
the invariant form of hamiltonian has a simple form for phonons which transforms as the @xmath7 representations of the group of wave - vector @xmath47 .
taking into account that @xmath6 and @xmath5 representations are real and pauli matrices @xmath48 corresponding to the doublet of @xmath6 or @xmath5 transform as @xmath49 ( @xmath50 ) for @xmath51 , @xmath32 ( @xmath52 ) for @xmath53 , @xmath33 ( @xmath54 ) for @xmath55 , and @xmath56 ( @xmath57 ) for @xmath58representations respectively , we can construct an invariant form of the hamiltonian : @xmath59 where @xmath60 the first term in ( 5 ) describes the symmetric coupling and is identical to the non - degenerate case .
the second and third terms describe the e - p interaction corresponding to the @xmath20 and @xmath23 directions respectively , while the last term describes the _ coupling to spins_. the proposed interaction ( 5 ) on its own results in splitting of the degenerate states ( a jahn - teller - like effect ) , breaking tetragonal symmetry and resulting in a local orthorhombic distortion .
it can therefore lead to the formation of pairs and stripes with no further interaction .
of course the stability and size of such a distortion will be determined by the balance of short - range attraction and long - range coulomb repulsion@xcite .
to determine the relevant wavevector @xmath40 applicable in ( 5 ) and ( 6 ) we need to look at the experimental data .
it is well known that for @xmath61 there are no significant phonon anomalies ( in raman or infrared spectroscopies for example ) which can be associated either with @xmath62 or the pseudogap @xmath63
. however , local probe experiments like neutron scattering@xcite , exafs@xcite and esr@xcite give a different picture , and point to the existence of sizeable lattice anomalies for @xmath64 .
the lattice distortions associated with these experimental observations are shown in figure 2 .
particularly the inelastic neutron data ( fig .
2a ) should be singled out here because of the unambiguity of the raw data . in these experiments
a large renormalisation of phonon frequency is ubiquitously observed along the @xmath20 direction in many cuprates , including 214 and 123 structure superconductors , but _ not _ in their parent insulators .
moreover , its temperature dependence clearly suggests a connection with pair formation@xcite .
the phonon @xmath7 modes corresponding to the @xmath20 direction which can couple to the electrons are shown in figure 3 .
one of these , o(1)1 can be clearly identified as the mode observed in neutron scattering experiments @xcite and may thus be indentified as the mode responsible for pairing or stripe formation .
we also note that from the experiments , the width in @xmath0-space of the anomaly is of the same order as the magnitude@xmath65 the interaction given in eqs.(5 ) and ( 6 ) leads directly to phase segregation of distorted and undistorted domains , where the size of domains is determined by the interplay of short - range attraction and screened coulomb repulsion as already mentioned@xcite .
the incommensurability of the interaction leads to modulation of charge density within the stripe .
importantly since the number of charged carriers in the stripe is less than the number of sites occupied by stripe , we may expect to observe itinerant behaviour in such stripes , i.e. the charge carriers are not localised within the stripe itself . at low doping when screening is reduced ,
the formation of the stripes of the length 2 ( pairs ) is most probable , while at lower temperatures and higher doping clearly longer stripes are more probable .
these pairs , contrary to the case of the holstein interaction is more extended in space and its size is governed by @xmath40 .
the central idea that the _ pair _ is the ground state entity which defines the extent of the e - p interaction leads to an interaction hamiltonian of degenerate modes with @xmath64 phonons which is suggested to describe the pairing and stripe formation in the cuprates .
the splitting of the degeneracy of planar o orbitals gives rise to a deformation either along the bond axes or along the diagonals , depending on which mode is chosen , but inelastic neutron scattering experiments suggest that the important interaction is along the cu - o bonds , giving rise to an @xmath66 - like form of the interaction as well as coupling to spins via an @xmath56-symmetry term .
remarkably , the interaction which splits the degeneracy of the o states via a jt - like effect is in spirit , if not in detail similar as was originally suggested by bednorz and muller in their original paper on la@xmath2ba@xmath3cuo@xmath4@xcite .
figure 1 . the brillouin zone of the tetragonal structure corresponding to la@xmath67sr@xmath3cuo@xmath68 according to experiment , the @xmath20 directions is of relevance for pairing and stripe formation .
a ) the wavevectors corresponding to the @xmath69representation at the @xmath70point of the point group @xmath21 . note that the relative magnitude of the displacements shown depends on the value of @xmath71 .
b ) the @xmath72 mode corresponding to the distortion suggested in ref . 4 ( fig . 2
b ) can also be viewed as a linear combination of two @xmath73 modes at the @xmath70point with different @xmath0 .
r.j.mcqueeney et al phys.rev.lett.82 628 ( 1999 ) and references therein .
the anomaly was originally reported by pinschovius et al .
, see for example physica , 162c-164c ( 1989 ) or ibid , 185c-189c 156 ( 1991 ) . | local intersite pairs in cuprate superconductors inferred from short coherence lengths determined from measurements @xmath10 pair dimensions @xmath11 exceed coherence length @xmath12 lattice distortions pairing finite range defined by extent pair @xmath13 form electron - phonon interaction phonon mode determined from experiments neutron scattering data large ( 30% ) anomaly in @xmath7 phonon mode @xmath14 direction observed in doped cuprates not parent compound@xcite anomaly incomensurate wavevector associated with pairing stripe formation electron phonon interaction written in form @xmath15 @xmath16 constant strength coupling @xmath17defines wavevector range @xmath18 width @xmath19 coupling with @xmath1using group theory phonon modes experimental data from neutron diffraction esr exafs observed features described by coupling @xmath7 - symmetry in - plane o - mode along @xmath20 direction to holes @xmath6 or @xmath5 - symmetry planar o statesbrillouin zone bz ) tetragonal point group @xmath21 la@xmath2sr@xmath3cuo@xmath4 figure 1 local pairs stripes cu - o bond direction@xmath22 @xmath20 @xmath23 points @xmath24 @xmath25 directions special symmetry points @xmath26 @xmath27 commensurate stripes analysis e - p coupling @xmath28 symmetrised cross product representations @xmath29 point @xmath30=[e_{g} e_{g}=a_{1g}+b_{1g}+b_{2g} electrons couple with @xmath31 modes no @xmath32 @xmath33 at @xmath29 point@xmath4 two modes in @xmath21 associated with apex oxygen o(2 ) ions or la ions lead symmetry breaking stripe formation symmetry breaking associated @xmath29 point @xmath34 finite @xmath35 tetragonal symmetry corresponds @xmath36 @xmath23 points in bz@xmath20 @xmath23 points four pronged star propose coupling electrons non - degenerate electronic states @xmath37 @xmath38 site label @xmath39 4 wavevectors prongs star stripe formation nondegenerate states associated with @xmath41-orbitals planar oxygens transform as @xmath42 or @xmath43 hamiltonian lead symmetry breaking phase separation short - range attraction long - range repulsion forces symmetry both phases same two - fold degenerate levels @xmath5 states planar @xmath44 @xmath45 orbitals @xmath5 @xmath6 states with @xmath46 phonons interested in phonons to symmetry breaking formation of stripes invariant form hamiltonian simple form for phonons transforms as @xmath7 representations of wave - vector @xmath47@xmath6 @xmath5 representations are real pauli matrices @xmath48 doublet transform as @xmath49 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath56 ) @xmath58representations construct invariant form of hamiltonian : @xmath59 where @xmath60 first term in 5 ) symmetric coupling identical to non - degenerate case second third terms describe e - p interaction @xmath20 @xmath23 directions last term coupling to spins_ proposed interaction 5 results in splitting degenerate states breaking tetragonal symmetry local orthorhombic distortion to formation of pairs stripes no further interaction stability size distortion determined by balance of short - range attraction long - range coulomb repulsion relevant wavevector @xmath40 in ( 5 ) 6 ) experimental data for @xmath61 no significant phonon anomalies associated with @xmath62 or pseudogap @xmath63 local probe experiments like neutron scattering exafs esr different picture sizeable lattice anomalies for @xmath64 lattice distortions shown in figure 2 inelastic neutron data2a ) singled out unambiguity raw data large renormalisation phonon frequency observed @xmath20 direction in cuprates including 214 123 structure superconductors not parent insulators temperature dependence suggests connection with pair formation@xcite phonon @xmath7 modes @xmath20 direction couple to electrons shown in figure 3 o(1)1 identified mode observed in neutron scattering experiments @xcite responsible for pairing stripe formation width in @xmath0-space anomaly same as magnitude@xmath65 interaction eqs.(5 ) 6 ) leads to phase segregation of distorted undistorted domains size determined by short - range attraction screened coulomb repulsion incommensurability interaction leads to modulation charge density stripe number charged carriers in stripe less than sites occupied stripe itinerant behaviour in stripes not localised stripe low doping screening formation stripes length 2 pairs ) probable lower temperatures higher doping longer stripes probable pairs interaction extended in space size governed by @xmath40 idea pair ground state entity e - p interaction leads interaction hamiltonian degenerate modes @xmath64 phonons pairing stripe formation in cuprates splitting planar o orbitals deformation bond axes or diagonals inelastic neutron scattering experiments suggest interaction cu - o bonds @xmath66 - like form coupling spins @xmath56-symmetry term interaction degeneracy o states jt - like effect suggested bednorz muller paper la@xmath2ba@xmath3cuo@xmath4@xcite figure 1 brillouin zone tetragonal structure la@xmath67sr@xmath3cuo@xmath68 @xmath20 directions for pairing stripe formation wavevectors @xmath69representation at @xmath70point point group @xmath21 magnitude displacements depends value @xmath71 @xmath72 mode distortion ref . 4 fig 2 linear combination two @xmath73 modes at @xmath70point different @xmath0 r.mcqueeney et al phys.rev.lett.82 628 ( 1999 anomaly reported by pinschovius et al . physica , 162c-164c 1989 ibid 185c-189c 156 ( 1991 ) | 0.350787 | 2,363 | 1,276 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,605 | in recent work of allen et .
al . , heuristic and numerical arguments were put forth to suggest that boundary value problems for black hole evolution , where an appropriate sommerfeld radiation condition is imposed , would probably fail to produce price law tails .
the interest in this issue lies in its possible implications for numerical relativity , where black hole evolution is typically studied in terms of such boundary formulations . in this note
, it is shown rigorously that indeed , price law tails do not arise in this case , i.e. that sommerfeld ( and more general ) radiation conditions lead to decay faster than any polynomial power .
our setting is the collapse of a spherically symmetric self - gravitating scalar field .
we allow an additional gravitationally coupled maxwell field .
the proof also applies to the easier problem of a spherically symmetric solution of the wave equation on a schwarzschild or reissner - nordstrm background .
the method relies on previous work of the authors .
one of the characteristic features of black holes forming in the context of gravitational collapse is the appearance of so - called _ price law tails_. these describe the decay of radiation on timelike curves in the exterior region of the black hole , as well as the decay of the radiation flux along the event horizon . in the context of radiation described by a scalar field , price @xcite
put forth heuristic arguments indicating that this decay should be @xmath0 , where @xmath1 is an eddington - finkelstein - like advanced time coordinate . in @xcite , it was rigorously proven in the context of the coupled einstein - scalar field equations under spherical symmetry ( and more generally of the einstein - maxwell - scalar field equations ) that @xmath2 , for any @xmath3 and sufficiently large @xmath4 .
the decay rates @xmath5 also hold for spherically symmetric solutions of the wave equation on a fixed schwarzschild or reissner - nordstrm background . in the present paper
, it is proven that if appropriate boundary conditions are imposed at @xmath6 , for fixed @xmath4 , then decay can be proven at rates faster than any given polynomial power .
the conditions include standard sommerfeld boundary conditions .
this paper was motivated by @xcite , where the absense of price law tails was suggested on the basis of heuristic arguments and numerical calculations .
in particular , this paper confirms the validity of the heuristics of @xcite .
in fact , the argument of this paper is a rather straightforward application of the method of @xcite . in that paper ,
decay rates were achieved by an inductive argument , at each step of which , the rate was improved by an amount constrained by information coming from infinity . as we shall see below , with appropriate boundary conditions
, there is no such constraint , and the decay rate can be improved at each step by a fixed finite polynomial power .
thus , the inductive argument yields that any polynomial power can be achieved . | the arguments of this paper apply to the einstein - maxwell - scalar field system under spherical symmetry . for an introduction to this system
, the author can consult @xcite .
the einstein - scalar field system , whose rigorous study was initiated in @xcite , is of course a special case , where the maxwell part vanishes .
the results of this paper also apply in the case where the wave equation is decoupled from the einstein equations . for more on the relationship between these two problems ,
see @xcite .
recall that the quotient manifold @xmath7 inherits a @xmath8-dimensional lorentzian metric , which in null coordinates takes the form @xmath9 .
the metric of @xmath10 can then be written @xmath11 , where @xmath12 is the standard metric on @xmath13 , and @xmath14 is the area radius function @xmath15 defined by @xmath16 .
we recall the hawking mass @xmath17 , and the mass aspect function @xmath18 . under spherical symmetry , the maxwell equations decouple , contributing a @xmath19 term to the energy momentum tensor , where @xmath20 is a constant . defining the `` renormalized '' hawking mass @xmath21 , the evolution of the metric and scalar field
are then completely determined by the following sytem of equations : @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 we also easily obtain from the above the equations @xmath30 and @xmath31
we will assume the existence of a spacetime bounded by an ingoing null curve , a timelike curve , and an outgoing null curve , which we will call the _ event horizon_. at @xmath32 , even though @xmath33 is part of the spacetime . ] certain conditions will be imposed on the initial ingoing null curve and the timelike boundary . in this paper , we will not concern ourselves with the explicit _ construction _ of solutions satisfying the conditions described here , although this can be accomplished easily enough using the methods of @xcite .
we consider a spacetime @xmath34 with penrose diagram depicted below , where @xmath35 is a timelike boundary : @xmath36 here , @xmath37 , but @xmath38 .
the point of intersection of the initial ingoing ray and @xmath35 will be @xmath39
. the ingoing ray will then be the curve @xmath40 .
the equations @xmath41@xmath42 are assumed to hold pointwise . on @xmath35 , @xmath43 , @xmath6 for some constant @xmath4 , and @xmath44 will be non - increasing as a function of @xmath1 , such that @xmath45 .
moreover , we assume that @xmath1 ranges in all of @xmath46 . on the ingoing null segment @xmath40 ,
we assume @xmath47 , @xmath48 bounded , @xmath49 .
this makes @xmath50 for some @xmath51 .
we will assume @xmath52 at @xmath53 .
we first show under the above assumptions , @xmath54 in @xmath34 , and @xmath55 in @xmath56 .
_ let @xmath57 be the region @xmath58 we first note that @xmath59 is continuous .
for @xmath59 is assumed to be differentiable in the @xmath1 direction , while differentiating @xmath60 in the @xmath61 direction one obtains an evolution equation for @xmath62 , which initially is @xmath63 . by continuity of @xmath59
, @xmath57 is an open subset of @xmath34 . in @xmath64 , we clearly have @xmath65 , and @xmath66 in @xmath67 .
thus , it follows that @xmath55 in @xmath68 . for
, if @xmath69 , and @xmath70 , then @xmath71 for all @xmath72 , and thus the curve @xmath73 can not intersect @xmath35 .. see @xcite ] thus , by @xmath74 , we have @xmath75 in @xmath76 , and so , denoting @xmath77}\varpi(u,1)$ ] we have @xmath78 in @xmath79 . integrating @xmath80 from @xmath40 ,
it is clear that @xmath81 . from @xmath82
, we have @xmath83 integrating @xmath60 , it follows that @xmath84 on @xmath79 .
thus @xmath85 .
this completes the proof .
we note now that from the above proposition and the results of @xcite , it follows that @xmath87 , @xmath88 in @xmath34 , and thus , since @xmath89 , we have @xmath52 throughout @xmath34 .
this immediately yields @xmath90 where we use the fact that @xmath91 and @xmath92 have the same sign to obtain the lower bound .
we will show the following the above two propositions and the archimedean property of the real numbers immediately yield the theorem .
_ proof of proposition 2_. we note that proposition 1 gives all the information necessary to apply section 5 of @xcite .
the propositions of that section immediately yield the result of this proposition . in the process , one obtains a lower bound @xmath102 which we will require below .
_ proof of proposition 3_. consider a dyadic decomposition of the event horizon , with respect to the @xmath1 coordinate , as in @xcite .
@xmath103 in each dyadic interval , we can select , again as in @xcite , a subinterval @xmath104 , split into two pieces as shown below , each of length @xmath105 , @xmath106 such that @xmath107 here @xmath1 denotes the @xmath1-value of any point in the dyadic interval .
( recall that these values are all comparable to the length of the dyadic interval . ) we note that the assumptions of propositions of section 6 of @xcite hold .
we thus obtain the bound @xmath108 on the interval @xmath109 .
it follows immediately , in view of the bounds @xmath110 , and @xmath111 that , @xmath112 now , by the inequalities @xmath75 , @xmath113 , the fact that @xmath44 is nonincreasing to the future along @xmath35 , and the equation @xmath74 , this implies immediately @xmath114 along the event horizon . by the dyadic nature of the decomposition
, @xmath115 holds for all values of @xmath1 , and not just for the @xmath1-values of the future endpoints of @xmath104 .
finally , by @xmath116 , this proves immediately @xmath117 . applying again the results of section 6 of @xcite ,
now with _ any _ subinterval of the event horizon of length @xmath118 , in view of @xmath117 , we obtain that the inequality @xmath119 holds throughout @xmath34 , in particular , on @xmath35 .
the boundary conditions , namely @xmath43 , @xmath120 , @xmath44 is non - increasing on @xmath35 , yield that @xmath121 on @xmath35 , and thus by @xmath122 we have @xmath123 on @xmath35 .
integrating now the equation @xmath124 from @xmath35 , in view of the bounds @xmath111 , @xmath116 , and @xmath122 , we obtain @xmath125 throughout @xmath34 .
this concludes the proof . | arguments paper apply einstein - maxwell - scalar field system under spherical symmetry introduction consult @xcite einstein - scalar field system study initiated in @xcite special case maxwell part vanishes results apply wave equation decoupled from einstein equations relationship see @xcite quotient manifold @xmath7 inherits @xmath8-dimensional lorentzian metric null form @xmath9 metric @xmath10 written @xmath11 @xmath12 standard metric on @xmath13 @xmath14 area radius function @xmath15 defined by @xmath16 recall hawking mass @xmath17 mass aspect function @xmath18 under spherical symmetry maxwell equations decouple @xmath19 term to energy momentum tensor @xmath20 constant renormalized hawking mass @xmath21 evolution metric scalar field determined by equations @xmath22 assume spacetime bounded by ingoing null curve timelike curve outgoing null curve event horizon_ @xmath32 @xmath33 part of spacetime conditions imposed on initial ingoing null curve timelike boundarypaper solutions satisfying conditions methods @xcite consider spacetime @xmath34 penrose diagram @xmath35 timelike boundary @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 intersection ingoing ray @xmath35 @xmath39 ingoing ray curve @xmath40 equations @xmath41@xmath42 hold pointwise @xmath35 @xmath43 @xmath6 @xmath4 @xmath44 non - increasing function of @xmath1 @xmath45 @xmath1 ranges in @xmath46 ingoing null segment @xmath40 assume @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 assume @xmath52 at @xmath53 show @xmath54 in @xmath34 @xmath55 in @xmath56 @xmath57 region @xmath58 @xmath59 continuous differentiable in @xmath1 direction differentiating @xmath60 @xmath61 direction obtains evolution equation for @xmath62 initially @xmath63 continuity @xmath59 @xmath57 open subset of @xmath34 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 in @xmath67 @xmath55 in @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 for @xmath72 curve @xmath73 intersect @xmath35 see @xcite @xmath74 @xmath75 in @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 in @xmath79 integrating @xmath80 from @xmath40 clear @xmath81 from @xmath82 @xmath83 integrating @xmath60 @xmath84 on @xmath79 @xmath85 completes proof proposition results @xcite @xmath87 @xmath88 in @xmath34 since @xmath89 @xmath52 throughout @xmath34 yields @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 same sign obtain lower bound two propositions archimedean property real numbers yield theorem proof of proposition 2 proposition 1 gives information apply section 5 of @xcite propositions yield result obtains lower bound @xmath102 require below proof of proposition 3 dyadic decomposition of event horizon @xmath1 coordinate @xcite@xmath103 each dyadic interval select subinterval @xmath104 split two pieces each length @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath1 denotes @xmath1-value point dyadic interval values comparable to length dyadic interval assumptions propositions section 6 @xcite hold obtain bound @xmath108 interval @xmath109 bounds @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112 inequalities @xmath75 @xmath113 @xmath44 nonincreasing future @xmath35 equation @xmath74 implies @xmath114 event horizon dyadic nature decomposition @xmath115 holds all values @xmath1 not @xmath1-values future endpoints @xmath104 @xmath116 proves @xmath117 results section 6 @xcite subinterval event horizon length @xmath118 @xmath117 inequality @xmath119 holds @xmath34 @xmath35 boundary conditions @xmath43 @xmath120 @xmath44 non - increasing @xmath35 yield @xmath121 on @xmath35 @xmath122 @xmath123 on @xmath35integrating equation @xmath124 from @xmath35 bounds obtain @xmath125 throughout @xmath34 concludes proof | 0.302871 | 1,704 | 956 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,607 | recent phenix elliptic flow ( @xmath0 ) measurements for identified particles produced in au+au and cu+cu collisions at @xmath1 gev are presented and compared to other rhic measurements .
they indicate universal scaling of @xmath0 compatible with partonic collectivity leading to the flow of light , strange and heavy quarks with a common expansion velocity field . | universal scaling of elliptic flow ( @xmath0 ) has been recently observed at rhic @xcite .
that is , for a broad range of particle species , @xmath2 vs. @xmath3 scales to a single function ; here , @xmath4 and @xmath5 are the number of valence quarks ( @xmath6 for mesons and baryons respectively ) and the transverse kinetic energy of the particle .
this observation has been interpreted as evidence that transverse expansion of the matter produced in energetic rhic collisions , occurs during a phase dominated by partonic collectivity . in this contribution we further demonstrate ; ( i ) the partonic origin of @xmath0 via scaling tests for the @xmath7 meson ; ( ii ) essentially full thermalization for the charm quark via scaling tests for d meson @xmath0 ; and ( iii ) validate universal scaling of @xmath0 in au+au and cu+cu collisions at @xmath1 gev .
differential @xmath0 measurements for multi - strange hadrons ( @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 ) allow us to address the important question of how the existence of a hadronic phase affects @xmath0 .
these particles are to have a small hadronic cross section for interaction with non - strange hadrons . consequently ,
if elliptic flow was established in a phase involving hadrons interacting with their standard hadronic cross sections ( post - hadronization ) , one would expect @xmath0 for the multi - strange hadrons to be significantly smaller than that for other hadrons ( e.g. @xmath10 , k , @xmath11 ) .
the left panel of fig . 1 compares phenix @xmath0 results for the @xmath7 meson , @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 from 20 - 60% central au+au collisions ; they show that , despite its mass which is comparable to that for the @xmath10 and @xmath15 , its @xmath16 values are similar to those for the lighter mesons ( @xmath11 and @xmath17 ) whose hadronic re - scattering cross sections are expected to be large . the right panel of fig . 1 shows the positive results from a validation test for universal scaling of the @xmath7 meson @xmath0 .
the recent high - statistics preliminary star results for @xmath9 and @xmath8 produced in au+au collisions at @xmath18 gev @xcite show a similar universal scaling @xcite .
these results suggest that the @xmath0 values for hadrons comprised of u , d and s quarks develop in the partonic phase and the existence of a hadronic phase does not lead to their modification .
further insight into properties of the produced medium at rhic can be obtained from the study of elliptic flow of particles comprised of heavy quarks ( charm or bottom ) . if charm quarks flow like light quarks
, it would indicate an unexpectedly strong interaction of charm with the medium .
one method of accessing charm @xmath0 is to measure the @xmath0 for non - photonic " electrons @xcite . a recent high statistics phenix measurements show rather larger elliptic flow for non - photonic " electrons from au+au collsions at @xmath1 gev @xcite .
the non - photonic " electrons arise mainly from d meson decay for @xmath19 2gev / c .
therefore , the large heavy flavor electron @xmath0 indicates that the d meson and consequently the charm quark , do flow with a large @xmath0 .
this suggests that the in - medium interactions are strong and perhaps frequent enough to thermalize the charm quark .
if this is indeed the case , then @xmath16 for the d meson should show the same universal scaling presented earlier for other hadrons .
the @xmath0 values for d mesons can been obtained from the values for non - photonic electrons via detailed simulations , see @xcite for details . for these simulations , it is necessary to assume the shape for @xmath20 for the d mesons .
the left and right panels of fig . 2
compare the unscaled and scaled results ( respectively ) for @xmath0 vs. @xmath5 for @xmath21 and @xmath22 mesons measured in minimum bias au+au collisions at @xmath1 gev . here
, the assumed shape for the @xmath23 dependence of the d meson @xmath0 is that for the proton ( see @xcite ) .
this assumption is compatible with a large array of differential @xmath0 measurements for different heavy " particle species @xcite .
both panels of fig .
2 show robust scaling ; they confirm that the d mesons ( for @xmath24 gev / c ) and hence , their associated charm quarks , flow with a fluid velocity field similar to that for the other quarks .
this suggests that the medium responds as a thermalized fluid and the transport mean free path is small .
if @xmath0 develops in a phase dominated by partonic collectivity and @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 quarks flow with a common velocity field , one expects universal scaling for all particle species measured at rhic .
figure 3(a ) shows differential flow measurements @xmath20 , for several particle species produced at mid - rapidity in central and semi - central au+au collisions at @xmath29=200 gev ; they span essentially the full range of measurements ( several hundred data points ) at rhic .
the @xmath0 values for pions ( @xmath30 ) , kaons @xmath13 , ( anti-)protons ( @xmath31,p ) , ( anti-)deuterons ( @xmath32)d and the @xmath7 meson comprise results from the phenix @xcite .
the values for neutral kaons ( @xmath33 ) , lambdas ( @xmath34 ) , cascades ( @xmath35 ) and omegas ( @xmath36 ) represent results from the star @xcite .
3 ( b ) shows the scaled results ( @xmath37 vs @xmath3 ) obtained from the same data ; here @xmath38 is the integral @xmath0 of charged hadrons for each of the indicated centrality selections , multiplied by a constant factor @xmath39 ( i.e. @xmath40 ) @xcite .
recent measurements @xcite indicate that @xmath41 is independent of centrality and the size of the colliding system as would be expected from a hydrodynamic system .
3(b ) indicates that the relatively complicated dependence of @xmath0 on centrality , transverse momentum , particle type , etc .
, for particles produced at mid - rapidity can be scaled to a single function .
1(c ) demonstrates that the same scaling also holds for @xmath12,(@xmath13 ) and ( @xmath31,p ) produced at mid - rapidity in cu+cu collisions at @xmath29=200 gev . vs. @xmath23 and ( b ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for several centralities and particle species as indicated .
( c ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and ( @xmath31,p ) from cu+cu and au+au collisions at @xmath18 gev , scaledwidth=85.0% ] vs. @xmath23 and ( b ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for several centralities and particle species as indicated .
( c ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and ( @xmath31,p ) from cu+cu and au+au collisions at @xmath18 gev , scaledwidth=85.0% ] vs. @xmath23 and ( b ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for several centralities and particle species as indicated .
( c ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and ( @xmath31,p ) from cu+cu and au+au collisions at @xmath18 gev , scaledwidth=85.0% ] vs. @xmath23 and ( b ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for several centralities and particle species as indicated .
( c ) @xmath42 ) vs. @xmath3 for @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and ( @xmath31,p ) from cu+cu and au+au collisions at @xmath18 gev , scaledwidth=85.0% ]
validation tests for the universal scaling of @xmath0 at rhic , suggest that the transverse expansion dynamics leading to elliptic flow are not controlled by ordinary hadrons interacting with their standard hadronic cross sections . instead , they suggest a pre - hardonization state exhibiting partonic collectivity leading to the flow of light , strange and heavy quarks with a common expansion velocity field .
10 phenix collaboration , a. adare _ et.al . _ nucl - ex/0608033 phenix collaboration , m. issah _ et.al .
_ nucl - ex/0604011 r. a. lacey , a. taranenko , nucl - ex/0610029 star collaboration , m. oldenburg _ et.al._ , _ _ j .
phys . g__**32 * * , s563 ( 2006 ) phenix collaboration , s. sakai _ et.al._ , _ _ j .
phys . g__**32 * * , s551 ( 2006 ) ; phenix collaboration , a. adare _ et.al .
_ nucl - ex/0611018 ; star collaboration , j. adams _ et.al .
lett . _ * 92 * , 052302 ( 2004 ) ; j. adams _ et.al . _ _ phys .
rev . _ * c72 * , 014904 ( 2005 ) , j. adams _ et.al .
lett _ * 95 * , 122301 ( 2005 ) phenix collaboration , s. s. adler _ et.al . _
lett . _ * 96 * , 032302 ( 2006 ) | scaling elliptic flow ( @xmath0 observed at rhic @xcite particle species @xmath2 vs. @xmath3 scales to single function @xmath4 and @xmath5 are valence quarks @xmath6 mesons baryons transverse kinetic energy particle transverse expansion energetic rhic collisions occurs during phase partonic collectivity partonic origin of @xmath0 via scaling tests @xmath7 meson full thermalization for charm quark via scaling tests d meson @xmath0 universal scaling @xmath0 in au+au cu+cu collisions at @xmath1 gev differential @xmath0 measurements for multi - strange hadrons @xmath7 hadronic phase affects @xmath0 particles small hadronic cross section for interaction with non - strange hadrons if elliptic flow established phase hadrons @xmath0 for multi - strange hadrons smaller other hadrons left panel of fig .compares phenix @xmath0 results 20 - 60% central au+au collisions mass comparable @xmath16 values similar lighter mesons hadronic re - scattering cross sections large right panel 1 shows positive results validation test universal scaling @xmath7 meson recent high - statistics results @xmath9 @xmath8 collisions @xmath18 gev @xcite show similar universal scaling suggest @xmath0 values for hadrons u d s quarks develop in partonic phase hadronic phase lead modification insight properties medium study elliptic flow of particles heavy quarks charm quarks flow like light quarks strong interaction charm with medium charm measure for non - photonic electrons @xcite statistics phenix measurements show larger elliptic flow for non - photonic electrons from au+au collsions at @xmath1 gev @xcite electrons arise from d meson decay for @xmath19 2gev / c large heavy flavor electron @xmath0 indicates d meson charm quark flow with large @xmath0 in - medium interactions strong thermalize charm quark@xmath16 d meson show universal scaling hadrons @xmath0 values d mesons obtained from non - photonic electrons simulations assume shape @xmath20 d mesons left panels fig . 2 compare unscaled scaled results @xmath0 vs @xmath5 @xmath21 mesons minimum bias au+au collisions at @xmath1 gev assumed shape @xmath23 dependence d meson is proton compatible with differential @xmath0 measurements for heavy particle species panels show robust scaling confirm d mesons @xmath24 charm quarks flow with fluid velocity field similar other quarks medium responds as thermalized fluid transport mean free path small if @xmath0 develops phase partonic collectivity @xmath25 quarks flow common velocity field expects universal scaling for all particle species at rhic figure 3(a shows differential flow measurements @xmath20 several particle species mid - rapidity central semi - central au+au collisions at @xmath29=200 gev full range of measurements at rhic@xmath0 values for pions kaons anti-)protons)deuterons meson results from phenix @xcite values neutral kaons lambdas cascades omegas represent results from star @xcite 3 shows scaled results @xmath37 vs @xmath3 from same data @xmath38 is integral @xmath0 of charged hadrons for centrality selections multiplied by constant factor @xmath39 ) @xcite measurements @xmath41 independent of centrality size colliding system 3(b dependence of @xmath0 on centrality transverse momentum particle type for particles mid - rapidity scaled to single function 1 same scaling holds for @xmath12,p ) at mid - rapidity in cu+cu collisions at @xmath29=200 gev vs. @xmath23 @xmath42 @xmath3 for centralities particle species @xmath42 vs @xmath3 for @xmath12,p from cu+cu au+au collisions at @xmath18 gev scaledwidth=85.0% vs. @xmath23 @xmath42 @xmath3 for centralities particle species vs@xmath3,p ) cu+cu au+au collisions @xmath18 gev scaledwidth=85.0% vs. @xmath23 @xmath42 vs @xmath3 centralities particle species @xmath42 vs @xmath3 @xmath31,p cu+cu au+au collisions gev scaledwidth=85.0% vs @xmath23 @xmath42 vs @xmath3 centralities particle species @xmath42 vs. @xmath3 @xmath31,p ) cu+cu au+au collisions @xmath18 gev scaledwidth=85.0% validation tests universal scaling @xmath0 rhic suggest transverse expansion dynamics elliptic flow not controlled ordinary hadrons hadronic cross sections suggest pre - hardonization state partonic collectivity flow light strange heavy quarks common expansion velocity field phenix collaboration a. adare et.al nucl - ex/0608033 m issah ex/0604011 lacey taranenko ex/0610029 star collaboration oldenburg.al phys . g__**32 s563 2006 phenix collaboration s. sakai.al g__**32 s551 2006 phenix collaborationadare et.al nucl ex/0611018 star collaboration j. adams et.al 92 052302 2004 ) j adams . rev. c72 014904 ( 2005 ) adams 95 122301 ( 2005 ) phenix collaboration adler et.al 96 032302 ( 2006 ) | 0.347075 | 2,255 | 1,181 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,618 | in this work we report on the production of charged pions , kaons , and ( anti ) protons in @xmath0and @xmath1collisions at @xmath2 = 2.76 tev for @xmath3 @xmath4 . the evolution of the nuclear modification factor , @xmath5 , with collision centrality and transverse momentum is discussed .
lhc , alice , identified particles , high @xmath6,heavy ions . | the particle identification ( pid ) is an important tool to study the hot and dense matter created in relativistic heavy ion collisions . at intermediate @xmath6(2 - 8
@xmath4 ) hadrons can be produced not only by fragmentation but also by quark recombination .
it allows us to learn how the medium affects the particle composition @xcite . in section 2
we describe the analysis to measure the production of @xmath7 as a function of @xmath6(3 - 20 @xmath4 ) .
the discussion of the results and conclusions are presented in sections 3 and 4 , respectively .
the measurement of the yields of charged pions , kaons and ( anti ) protons in the range @xmath8 @xmath4is statistically performed exploiting the peculiarity of the mean energy loss , @xmath9 , of particles traversing the the tpc gas , in the relativistic rise regime ( @xmath10 ) of the bethe - bloch ( bb ) curve .
the tpc response was calibrated using a clean sample of @xmath11 ( @xmath12 ) identified through the weak decay topology of @xmath13 ( @xmath14 ) .
primary pions and electrons were tagged using the time of flight ( tof ) detector .
after parametrization of the bb curve and of the @xmath15resolution as a function of the calibrated @xmath9 , the measured resolution of minimum ionizing particles were @xmath16 and @xmath17 for low ( @xmath0 ) and high ( @xmath10 - 5% ) multiplicity environment , respectively .
the yields were extracted by fitting the quantity @xmath18@xmath19 to a sum of four gaussian functions ( @xmath20 ) in each @xmath6interval . the means and sigmas were constrained using the aforementioned parametrization and the @xmath6spectra obtained via factorization , as described in @xcite .
the main source of systematic uncertainty comes from the estimation of the parameters of the fitted functions .
a range of variation for those parameters was evaluated running the analysis without exploiting the information from topological and tof pid .
the parameters were randomly varied in the estimated ranges , then the yields were extracted using the same algorithm as in data . at high
@xmath6(@xmath21 @xmath4 ) the systematic uncertainties were 5% , @xmath22% and @xmath23% for @xmath11 , @xmath24 and @xmath12 , respectively .
also , we added the systematic errors from the spectra of inclusive charged particles @xcite .
figure [ fig : ptopi ] shows @xmath25 as a function of @xmath6for @xmath1and @xmath0collisions at @xmath26 2.76 tev . for completeness the lower @xmath6results are also displayed for @xmath1 @xcite . at intermediate @xmath6the ratio
is enhanced , this phenomenon was first observed at rhic @xcite . the maximum is located at 3 @xmath4and reaches @xmath27 ( @xmath28 ) for the most central ( peripheral ) events . for higher
@xmath6(@xmath29 @xmath4 ) , the ratio is consistent with fragmentation in vacuum .
figure [ fig : ptopi7 ] shows a comparison with the ratio in @xmath0collisions at @xmath30 7 tev .
it is interesting that even the @xmath0data exhibit a maximum in the same @xmath6region as observed in @xmath1collisions .
ratio a a function of @xmath6compared to @xmath0at 2.76 tev .
statistical and systematic uncertainties are displayed as error bars and boxes , respectively .
the low @xmath6results come from the combined pid of its , tpc and tof @xcite . ]
ratio as a function of @xmath6between @xmath1and @xmath0collisions at @xmath31 2.76 tev and 7 tev , respectively .
statistical and systematic uncertainties are displayed as error bars and boxes , respectively .
the low @xmath6results come from the combined pid of its , tpc and tof @xcite .
in addition the @xmath0result includes the information of the cherenkov detector , hmpid . ]
alice previously reported the nuclear modification factor ( @xmath32 ) for @xmath11 and @xmath33 @xcite .
now figure [ raa : k ] shows the @xmath32as a function of @xmath6for pions , kaons and protons , the results are presented for 0 - 5% and 60 - 80% .
for the most central events and at intermediate @xmath6(2 - 8 @xmath4 ) , @xmath32@xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath32@xmath36 and @xmath32@xmath34 @xmath37 @xmath32@xmath38 , no significant species dependence is seen at high @xmath6 . as a function of @xmath6for @xmath7 in 0 - 5% ( left ) and 60 - 80% ( right ) @xmath1collisions .
statistical and systematic uncertainties are displayed as error bars and boxes , respectively.,title="fig : " ] as a function of @xmath6for @xmath7 in 0 - 5% ( left ) and 60 - 80% ( right ) @xmath1collisions .
statistical and systematic uncertainties are displayed as error bars and boxes , respectively.,title="fig : " ]
at intermediate @xmath6 , we observe an enhancement of the @xmath39 ratio . within systematics ,
@xmath7 are equally suppressed at high @xmath6which suggests that the fragmentation is not modified by the medium .
00 k. yagiet _
et al . , _
`` quark - gluon plasma '' , cambridge , ( 2005 ) .
j. alme _ et al . , _
( alice collaboration ) , nucl .
instrum .
a * 622 * ( 2010 ) 316 .
peter christiansen , for the alice collaboration .
`` high @xmath6identified particle production in alice '' , arxiv:1208.5368 .
b. abelev _
et al_. , ( alice collaboration ) , `` pion , kaon , and proton production in central @xmath1collisions at @xmath41 tev '' , arxiv:1208.1974v1 .
leonardo milano , for the alice collaboration , `` identified charged hadron production at the lhc with the alice experiment '' , this proceedings . | particle identification ) hot dense matter in heavy ion collisions intermediate @xmath6(2 - 8 @xmath4 ) hadrons produced by fragmentation quark recombination medium affects particle composition section 2 analysis production @xmath7 function @xmath6(3 - 20 @xmath4 ) discussion results conclusions in sections 3 4 measurement yields charged pions kaons protons range @xmath8 @xmath4is mean energy loss particles traversing tpc gas rise regime bethe - bloch curve tpc response calibrated clean sample @xmath11 ( @xmath12 ) weak decay topology @xmath13 ( primary pions electrons tagged using time of flight tof detector parametrization bb curve @xmath15resolution calibrated @xmath9 measured resolution minimum ionizing particles @xmath16 @xmath17 for low high multiplicity environment yields extracted by fitting quantity @xmath18@xmath19 to four gaussian functions ) in each @xmath6interval means sigmas constrained using parametrization @xmath6spectra obtained via factorization systematic uncertainty from estimation parameters fitted functionsrange variation parameters evaluated without topological tof pid parameters randomly varied estimated ranges yields extracted same algorithm high @xmath6 systematic uncertainties 5% for added systematic errors from spectra inclusive charged particles @xcite shows @xmath25 function of @xmath6for @xmath0collisions at @xmath26 2.76 tev lower @xmath6results displayed for @xmath1 @xcite intermediate @xmath6the ratio enhanced observed @xcite maximum at 3 @xmath4and reaches @xmath27 ) events higher @xmath6 ratio consistent with fragmentation in vacuum comparison ratio @xmath0collisions at @xmath30 7 tev @xmath0data maximum in same @xmath6region @xmath1collisions ratio function of @xmath6compared 2.76 tev statistical systematic uncertainties displayed as error bars boxes low @xmath6results from combined pid tpc tof @xcite ratio function of @xmath6between @xmath1and @xmath0collisions at @xmath31 2.76 7 tevsystematic uncertainties displayed as error bars boxes low @xmath6results from combined pid tpc tof @xcite @xmath0result includes information cherenkov detector hmpid alice reported nuclear modification factor @xmath32 for @xmath11 @xmath33 @xcite figure shows @xmath32as function of @xmath6for pions kaons protons results presented for 0 - 5% 60 - 80% central events intermediate @xmath6(2 - 8 @xmath4 no significant species dependence at high @xmath6 function of @xmath6for @xmath7 in 0 - 5% 60 - 80% @xmath1collisions uncertainties displayed as error bars boxes function @xmath6for 0 - 5% - 80% uncertainties displayed as error bars boxes at intermediate @xmath6 enhancement of @xmath39 ratio @xmath7 suppressed at high @xmath6which fragmentation not modified by medium yagiet al quark - gluon plasma cambridge 2005 alme alice collaboration nucl . instrum 622 2010 ) 316peter christiansen alice collaboration high particle production alice arxiv:1208.5368 abelev alice collaboration pion kaon proton production central @xmath1collisions @xmath41 arxiv:1208.1974v1 leonardo milano alice charged hadron production lhc alice experiment proceedings | 0.258661 | 1,480 | 765 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,621 | almost all of the studies devoted to relativistic astrometry are based on the integration of the null geodesic differential equations .
however , the gravitational deflection of light rays can be calculated by a different method , based on the determination of the bifunction giving half the squared geodesic distance between two arbitrary points - events , the so - called synge s world function .
we give a brief review of the main results obtained by this method . | with advances in technology , it will become indispensable to determine numerous relativistic effects in the propagation of light beyond the first order in the newtonian gravitational constant @xmath0 , in particular in the area of space astrometry .
the global astrometric interferometer for astrophysics ( gaia , perryman _
2001 ) is already planned to measure the positions and/or the parallaxes of celestial objects with typical uncertainties in the range 1 - 10 @xmath1arcsecond ( @xmath1as ) whereas the laser astrometric test of relativity ( lator ) mission will measure the bending of light near the sun to an accuracy of 0.02 @xmath1as ( turyshev _ et al .
_ 2004 ) . in this last case , it is clear that the effects of the second order in @xmath0 must be taken into account . to obtain a modelling of the above - mentioned projects , it is necesssary to determine the deflection of light rays between two points @xmath2 and @xmath3 of space - time . in almost all of the theoretical studies devoted to this problem ,
the properties of light rays are determined by integrating the differential equations of the null geodesics .
this procedure is workable as long as one contents oneself with analyzing the effects of first order in @xmath0 , as it is proven by the generality of the results obtained in the litterature ( klioner 1991 , klioner & kopeikin 1992 , kopeikin 1997 , kopeikin & schfer 1999 , kopeikin & mashhoon 2002 , klioner 2003 ) .
unfortunately , analytical solution of the geodesic equations requires cumbersome calculations when terms of second order in @xmath0 are taken into account , even in the case of a static , spherically symmetric space - time ( richter & matzner 1982 , 1983 ) . however , an alternative approach exists and seems to be promising .
based on the synge s world function and variational properties of geodesic , it precisely does not require the knowledge of the geodesic and directly provides the time delay of light and the direction of a ray at the point of reception , i.e. at the observation point .
in this work we derive the general expression of the angular separation between two point light sources as measured by a given observer in arbitrary motion .
we show that the angular distance is fully determined if we calculate several ratios which can be obtained from the knowledge of the synge s world function . throughout this paper , @xmath4 is the speed of light in a vacuum and @xmath0 is the newtonian gravitational constant .
the lorentzian metric of space - time @xmath5 is denoted by @xmath6 .
we adopt the signature @xmath7 .
we suppose that space - time is covered by some global coordinate system @xmath8 .
we assume that the curves of equations @xmath9 const are timelike in the neighbourhood of the observer .
this condition means that @xmath10 in the vicinity of the observer .
we employ the vector notation @xmath11 in order to denote either the ordered set @xmath12 , or the orderer set @xmath13 .
given @xmath14 , for instance , @xmath15 denotes @xmath16 if @xmath17 and @xmath18 if @xmath19 ) , the einstein convention of summation on repeated indices being used in each case . the quantity @xmath20 denotes the ordinary euclidean norm of @xmath11 : @xmath21 if @xmath14 , and @xmath22 if @xmath23 .
the indices in parentheses characterize the order of a term in a perturbative expansion .
theses indices are set up or down , depending on the convenience .
to begin with , let us consider a light ray @xmath24 received at point @xmath25 and let us recall how is defined the direction of this ray as measured by an observer @xmath26 moving at @xmath27 with a unit 4-velocity @xmath28 .
the three - space relative to the observer @xmath26 at point @xmath27 is the subspace @xmath29 of tangent vectors orthogonal to @xmath28 ( see figure below ) . , width=510 ] an arbitrary vector @xmath30 at @xmath27 admits one and only one decomposition of the form v = v__u + v__u , where @xmath31 is colinear to the unit vector @xmath28 and @xmath32 is a vector of the three - space @xmath29 .
since @xmath32 and @xmath28 are orthogonal , one has v__u = ( u .
v ) u and v__u = v - ( u .
v ) u . the vector @xmath32 is called the ( orthogonal ) projection of @xmath30 onto the three - space relative to the observer @xmath26 .
its magnitude @xmath33 is given by v__u= .
the direction of vector @xmath30 as seen by the observer @xmath26 is the direction of the unit spacelike vector @xmath34 defined as v__u^ = = .
consider now a light ray @xmath24 received at @xmath27 and denote by @xmath35 a vector tangent to @xmath24 at @xmath27 . in this work
, we always assume that a vector tangent to a light ray is a null vector and is future oriented , so that l^2 = 0 , u.l > 0 .
the direction of the ray @xmath24 as measured by the observer @xmath26 is the direction of the vector @xmath36 . by using eq .
( [ di1 ] ) , and then taking into account eqs .
( [ nul ] ) , it is easy to see that l__u^ = - u .
let @xmath37 be an other light ray received at @xmath27 .
if @xmath38 denotes a vector tangent to @xmath37 at @xmath27 , the direction of @xmath37 as observed by @xmath26 is given by eq .
( [ di2 ] ) in which @xmath38 is substituted for @xmath35 . as a consequence , the angular separation between @xmath24 and @xmath37 as measured by @xmath26 may be defined as the angle @xmath39 between the two vectors @xmath36 and @xmath40 belonging to the same subspace @xmath29 ( see soffel 1988 , brumberg 1991 ) . angle @xmath39 may be characterized without ambiguity by relations as follow _
u = - l__u^ .
l__u^ , 0 _ u < .
taking into account properties of a light ray , we have the following relations @xmath41 as @xmath28 is an unitary vector , we can express @xmath42 with @xmath43 as follows = g_00 + 2 g_0i ^i + g_ij^i^j , where ^i = = .
finally , substituting equations ( [ llll]-[hlb ] ) into equation ( [ an1 ] ) yields the fundamental formula ^2 = - _ x_o , where _ 0 = 1 , _
i = , _ 0 = 1 , _
the determination of the angular distance thus requires explicit computations of the ratios @xmath44 and @xmath45
. they can be obtained by the integration of null geodesic equations .
however we will show that they result easily from the knowledge of the synge s world function .
synge s world function is a scalar function of the base point @xmath46 and the field point @xmath47 .
it is defined by ( synge , 1964 ) @xmath48 and the integral is evaluated on the unique geodesic @xmath49 that links @xmath46 to @xmath47 , @xmath50 being an affine parameter . a fundamental property of @xmath51 is to give an important information concerning the covariant components of the vectors tangent to @xmath49 at @xmath46 and @xmath47 respectively : @xmath52 if @xmath49 is a light ray , we can consider @xmath46 as the observation point . moreover , in this case , we have @xmath53 we recently show that explicit determination of @xmath51 can be obtained from the integration of hamilton - jacobi equations without the knowkledge of @xmath49 ( le poncin - lafitte _ et al .
all this means that determination of ratios @xmath44 and @xmath45 require the following steps : * to determine @xmath51 by solving hamilton - jacobi equations , * to impose the condition @xmath54 , * to compute the following relation @xmath55
in this paper , we give the general and rigorous expression of the observed angular distance between two point sources of light .
the fundamental formulae ( [ an7 ] ) and ( [ cov ] ) show that the theoretical calculation of the angular distance can be carried out when the world function is known . in this idealized sense
, one can say that the problem of space astrometry involves one and only one unknown function .
an other important point is that the aberration and the gravitational deflection of light can not be treated as completely distinct phenomena . | advances in technology indispensable to determine relativistic effects in propagation light beyond first order in newtonian gravitational constant @xmath0 space astrometry global astrometric interferometer for astrophysics ( 2001 ) planned to measure positions parallaxes of celestial objects uncertainties 1 - 10 @xmath1arcsecond ) laser astrometric test of relativity ) mission bending light near sun accuracy 0.02 @xmath1as ( turyshev 2004 ) effects of second order in @xmath0 must modelling necesssary determine deflection of light rays between points @xmath2 and @xmath3 space - time theoretical studies properties light rays determined by integrating differential equations of null geodesics procedure workable analyzing effects first order in @xmath0 proven by results ( klioner 1991 1992 1997 1999 2002 2003 ) analytical solution geodesic equations requires cumbersome calculations when terms second order in @xmath0 symmetric space - time ( richter & matzner 1982 1983 ) alternative approach exists promisingsynge s world function variational properties geodesic require knowledge provides time delay light direction ray at point reception observation point derive angular separation between two light sources measured by observer arbitrary motion angular distance determined ratios synge s world function @xmath4 speed light vacuum @xmath0 newtonian gravitational constant lorentzian metric space - time @xmath5 denoted by @xmath6 adopt signature @xmath7 space - time covered by global coordinate system @xmath8 curves of equations @xmath9 timelike neighbourhood observer @xmath10 vicinity observer vector notation @xmath11 denote ordered set @xmath12 orderer set @xmath13 @xmath15 denotes @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 einstein convention summation repeated indices quantity @xmath20 denotes euclidean norm of @xmath11 @xmath21 @xmath14 @xmath22 if @xmath23 indices in parentheses characterize order term in perturbative expansion set up or down convenienceconsider light ray @xmath24 at @xmath25 direction measured by observer @xmath26 at @xmath27 unit 4-velocity @xmath28 three - space subspace @xmath29 of tangent vectors orthogonal to @xmath28 vector @xmath30 at @xmath27 admits decomposition v = v__u + v__u @xmath31 colinear to vector @xmath28 @xmath32 vector - space @xmath29 orthogonal v__u = ( u . v ) u v__u = v - ( u . v ) u vector @xmath32 orthogonal projection of @xmath30 three - space magnitude @xmath33 given by v__u= direction of vector @xmath30 unit spacelike vector @xmath34 v__u^ = = light ray @xmath24 at @xmath27 denote @xmath35 vector tangent to @xmath24 @xmath27 vector tangent to light ray is null vector future oriented l^2 = 0 u.l > 0 direction of ray @xmath24 is direction vector @xmath36 eq . l__u^ = - u .@xmath37 light ray @xmath27 @xmath38 vector tangent @xmath37 direction observed @xmath26 by eq @xmath38 substituted for @xmath35 angular separation between @xmath24 @xmath37 angle @xmath39 between vectors @xmath36 @xmath40 subspace @xmath29 soffel 1988 brumberg 1991 angle characterized relations _ u = - l__u^ l__u^ 0 _ u < relations @xmath41 @xmath28 unitary vector @xmath42 with @xmath43 = g_00 + 2 g_0i ^i + g_ij^i^j ^i = = substituting equations llll]-[hlb into equation [ an1 ] yields formula ^2 = - _ x_o 0 = 1 = determination angular distance requires computations ratios @xmath44 @xmath45 obtained integration null geodesic equations synge s world function scalar function of base point @xmath46 field point @xmath47 defined by @xmath48 integral evaluated on geodesic @xmath49 @xmath46 to @xmath47 @xmath50 affine parameterfundamental property @xmath51 information covariant components vectors tangent to @xmath49 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath52 if @xmath49 light ray consider @xmath46 as observation point @xmath53 explicit determination of @xmath51 from integration hamilton - jacobi equations without @xmath49 determination of ratios @xmath44 @xmath45 require steps determine @xmath51 hamilton - jacobi equations impose condition @xmath54 compute relation @xmath55 general expression of observed angular distance between two sources light fundamental formulae ( [ an7 ] ) and ( [ cov ] ) show theoretical calculation angular distance when world function known problem of space astrometry involves one unknown function aberration gravitational deflection of light distinct phenomena | 0.311434 | 2,038 | 1,092 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,629 | a study of the colour - ordered one - loop amplitudes in @xmath0 sym reveals a surprising property : numerically , the amplitudes have an approximately universal form @xmath1 , where @xmath2 is helicity independent . this form is exact if the amplitude is a mhv amplitude , but has an `` error '' which is typically less than 1% for the six , seven and eight gluon nmhv one - loop amplitudes . + hep - th / yymmnnn + 2.cm * approximate universality of @xmath0 super - yang
mills one - loop amplitudes * 2.cm 2.cm david c. dunbar@xmath3 , james h. ettle and warren b. perkins 0.5 cm 0.5 cm _ department of physics + swansea university + swansea , sa2 8pp , uk _ .3 cm | the maximally supersymmetric yang mills theory , @xmath0 , is an extremely special four dimensional field theory . in this letter
we demonstrate that the colour ordered one - loop scattering amplitudes are remarkably close to a universal form : @xmath4 where @xmath2 is helicity - independent and @xmath5 is a helicity - dependent correction .
@xmath2 contains the exact @xmath6 and @xmath7 infrared singular terms .
we find that the error is surprisingly small , being less than @xmath8 for the explicit six , seven and eight point amplitudes we study .
the exact analytic forms of many one - loop amplitudes are known , however approximate universality is not manifest from an analytic study of these expressions .
instead it is observed when we numerically evaluate these analytic forms . in the next section we review the known analytic forms of @xmath0 one - loop @xmath9-point amplitudes and in section 3
we present a numerical study of these expressions for six and seven gluon amplitudes together with the nmhv eight - point amplitudes .
the one - loop amplitudes for gluon scattering in @xmath0 super - yang mills are particularly simple , being heavily constrained by the large symmetry .
they can be expressed entirely in terms of scalar boxes @xcite : @xmath10 the amplitude is completely defined by specifying the rational coefficients @xmath11 .
this is a considerable simplification relative to a generic yang
mills amplitude which would contain scalar triangle functions , scalar bubble functions and additional rational pieces .
the set of scalar box functions is @xmath12 with the labeling as indicated in figure [ boxesfigure ] .
+ such amplitudes are `` cut - constructible '' meaning they may be reconstructed using cutting rules with on - shell four dimensional tree amplitudes @xcite .
the coefficients @xmath11 may be determined in various ways , originally via the two - particle cuts @xcite , but perhaps most conveniently using `` quadruple cuts '' @xcite .
the quadruple cuts give the box - coefficients as a product of four tree amplitudes , @xmath13 the sum is over all allowed intermediate configurations and particle types @xcite . using the expansion of eq .
( [ boxexpansion ] ) together with the quadruple cuts makes the computation of one - loop amplitudes considerably more tractable than the corresponding qcd amplitudes .
it is convenient to define rescaled box functions @xmath14 by @xmath15 the @xmath16 functions are the box functions with the appropriate momentum prefactors removed ; explicit formulae may be found in , for example , ref.@xcite
. the momentum invariants are @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
analytic results will be given in the four - dimensional helicity regularisation scheme ( fdh ) @xcite with the box integrals defined in @xmath19 dimensions .
the amplitudes in other schemes such as t hooft veltman are simply related to those in fdh via @xmath20 which leads to a small modification of @xmath2 but leaves @xmath5 unchanged . in any supersymmetric theory
the gluon scattering amplitudes with all or all - but - one helicities of the same type vanish @xmath21 and the simplest non - vanishing amplitudes are the `` mhv '' ( maximally helicity - violating ) amplitudes which have exactly two negative helicity gluons . at tree level
these amplitudes are given by the parke
taylor formula @xcite , @xmath22 for a partial amplitude where @xmath23 and @xmath24 label the legs with negative helicity .
we use the notation @xmath25 , @xmath26 , with @xmath27 being a massless weyl spinor with momentum @xmath28 and chirality @xmath29 @xcite .
the spinor products are related to momentum invariants by @xmath30 with @xmath31 .
the one - loop mhv amplitudes in @xmath0 have the form @xcite : @xmath32 where the sum of @xmath33 functions is over all possible inequivalent functions with the appropriate cyclic ordering of legs .
the form @xmath2 is universal in that it does not depend upon which two legs have negative helicity .
the sum over box coefficients can be expressed in terms of logarithms and dilogarithms via @xmath34 where all indices are understood to be mod @xmath9 and @xmath35 is the renormalisation scale .
the forms of @xmath36 and @xmath37 depend upon whether @xmath9 is odd or even .
for @xmath38 , @xmath39 \biggr)\ , \equn\ ] ] @xmath40 whereas for @xmath41 , @xmath42 \biggr ) -\sum_{i=1}^{n/2 } \li \biggl [ 1- { \tn{m-1}{i } \tn{m+1}{i-1 } \over \tn{m}{i } \tn{m}{i-1 } } \biggr]\ , \equn\ ] ] @xmath43 the nmhv amplitudes have also been calculated @xcite and have very different forms from the mhv amplitudes . for example
let us examine the six - point amplitudes .
the three independent nmhv amplitudes are constructed from the one - mass box functions , @xmath44 and the two - mass - hard boxes @xmath45 in the very special combinations @xmath46 } } \right)^\e - \ln\left({-t_{i}^{[3]}\over -t_i^{[2]}}\right ) \ln\left({-t_{i}^{[3 ] } \over -t_{i+1}^{[2]}}\right ) \cr & \quad - \ln\left({-t_{i}^{[3 ] } \over -t_{i+3}^{[2]}}\right ) \ln\left({-t_{i}^{[3 ] } \over -t_{i+4}^{[2]}}\right ) + \ln\left({-t_{i}^{[3 ] } \over -t_{i+2}^{[2]}}\right ) \ln\left({-t_{i}^{[3 ] } \over -t_{i+5}^{[2]}}\right ) \cr & \quad + { 1\over 2}\ln\left({-t_{i}^{[2 ] } \over -t_{i+3}^{[2]}}\right ) \ln\left({-t_{i+1}^{[2 ] } \over -t^{[2]}_{i+4}}\right ) + { 1\over 2}\ln\left({-t_{i-1}^{[2 ] } \over -t_{i}^{[2]}}\right ) \ln\left({-t_{i+1}^{[2 ] } \over -t_{i+2}^{[2]}}\right ) \cr & \quad + { 1\over 2}\ln\left({-t_{i+2}^{[2]}\over -t_{i+3}^{[2]}}\right ) \ln\left({-t_{i+4}^{[2 ] } \over -t_{i+5}^{[2 ] } } \right ) + { \pi^2\over3}\ . \cr } \equn\label{wdef}\ ] ] as we can see the dilogarithms drop out of this expression .
this feature of the @xmath0 nmhv six - point amplitudes persists for amplitudes involving external states other than gluons @xcite but not beyond six points . the first nmhv @xmath0 amplitude is given by @xmath47 where the coefficients @xmath48 are given in terms of the @xmath49 function @xmath50 with @xmath51 and @xmath52 for convenience we use @xmath53 and @xmath54\langle 2\:4 \rangle + [ 1\:3]\langle3\:4\rangle$ ] , etc .
the other amplitudes are : @xmath55 , \cr } \equn\ ] ] where @xmath56 and @xmath57 , \cr } \equn\ ] ] where @xmath58 the seven - point `` split helicity '' nmhv amplitude , @xmath59 , was computed in ref .
@xcite and the remaining seven - point nmhv amplitudes in ref .
@xcite , with the generalisation to all-@xmath9 being given in ref .
the detailed formulae are given in these references , however the pattern for the nmhv is one of increasing complexity .
for example the seven - point amplitude is @xmath60 which is a sum over all possible seven - point box functions .
the formulae for the 35 coefficients are given in two different forms in ref .
@xcite and ref .
@xcite . very few coefficients are absent .
for example the amplitude @xmath59 has 29 non - vanishing coefficients while in the amplitude @xmath61 all 35 coefficients are non - zero .
we have implemented the expressions of ref .
@xcite and used them to study the seven- and eight - point nmhv amplitudes numerically .
in this section we present a numerical study of approximate universality in @xmath0 one - loop amplitudes .
since four- and five - point amplitudes must be mhv ( or conjugate to mhv ) these amplitudes have an exact universality ; therefore we start our study with the six - point amplitudes .
the functional forms of the different components of the six - point amplitudes are gathered together in @xcite together with the implementation of most of these in mathematica .
these components have also been calculated at a specific kinematic point and evaluated numerically by ellis , giele and zandereghi ( egz ) @xcite . for convenience
we first examine the amplitudes at this kinematic point using the published numerical values . in table
[ sixpointn4 ] we extract the @xmath0 amplitudes and split them into their @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath62 pieces .
we also look at the combination @xmath63 .
if the amplitudes were exactly universal this combination would be identical for each helicity configuration .
the numerical value of the tree amplitude is embedded within this table since the coefficient of @xmath6 is just @xmath64 .
we have only included a single mhv amplitude since the combination @xmath63 is identical for the different mhv amplitudes . as we can see , despite the very different analytic forms of the nmhv expressions , the amplitudes are numerically almost universal .
.the almost universal nature of the six - gluon @xmath0 amplitudes at the egz kinematic point . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
there are many surprises but no accidents in quantum field theory .
we have been surprised by the almost universal nature of the one - loop amplitudes we have studied here .
we have seen approximate universality in maximally supersymmetric gauge theory but not in pure gauge theory , minimally supersymmetric theories , nor @xmath65 supergravity .
the main contributions to the scattering appear completely determined by the tree amplitude .
explanations for this could be simply the amplitude being largely determined by its infrared behaviour , or more intriguingly , an indication of a broken symmetry such as dual conformal symmetry @xcite
. it would be interesting to explore this behaviour beyond one loop and possibly relate it to some of the other remarkable results in the @xmath66-matrix of @xmath0 super - yang
mills @xcite , and to explore whether approximate universality continues , or indeed becomes exact , in theories related to @xmath0 yang
mills such as twistor string theory @xcite .
n. e. j. bjerrum - bohr , d. c. dunbar , h. ita , w. b. perkins and k. risager , jhep * 0612 * ( 2006 ) 072 [ hep - th/0610043 ] ; + z. bern , n. e. j. bjerrum - bohr and d. c. dunbar , jhep * 0505 * ( 2005 ) 056 [ hep - th/0501137 ] ; + z. bern , j. j. carrasco , d. forde , h. ita and h. johansson , phys .
d * 77 * ( 2008 ) 025010 [ arxiv:0707.1035 [ hep - th ] ] ; + n. e. j. bjerrum - bohr and p. vanhove , jhep * 0810 * ( 2008 ) 006 [ arxiv:0805.3682 [ hep - th ] ] . | supersymmetric yang mills theory @xmath0 special four dimensional field theory colour ordered one - loop scattering amplitudes close to universal form @xmath4 @xmath2 helicity - independent @xmath5 helicity - dependent correction @xmath2 contains @xmath6 @xmath7 infrared singular terms error small less than @xmath8 for six seven eight point amplitudes exact analytic forms of one - loop amplitudes known approximate universality not manifest from analytic study observed numerically review @xmath0 one - loop @xmath9-point amplitudes section 3 numerical study for six seven gluon amplitudes eight - point amplitudes one - loop amplitudes for gluon scattering in @xmath0 super - yang mills simple constrained by large symmetry expressed scalar boxes @xmath10 amplitude defined by rational coefficients @xmath11 simplification generic yang mills amplitude set scalar box functions is @xmath12 labeling figure amplitudes cut - constructible reconstructed using cutting rules four dimensional tree amplitudes coefficients @xmath11 determined two - particle cuts quadruple cutsquadruple cuts give box - coefficients four tree amplitudes @xmath13 sum intermediate configurations particle types expansion quadruple cuts one - loop amplitudes tractable qcd define rescaled box functions @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 functions box momentum prefactors removed formulae in. momentum invariants @xmath17 @xmath18 results in four - dimensional helicity regularisation scheme box integrals @xmath19 dimensions amplitudes other schemes related to fdh via @xmath20 modification @xmath2 @xmath5 unchanged supersymmetric theory gluon scattering amplitudes with helicities vanish non - vanishing amplitudes maximally helicity - violating amplitudes two negative helicity gluons tree level amplitudes parke taylor formula partial amplitude @xmath23 @xmath24 label legs negative helicity notation @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 massless weyl spinor with momentum @xmath28 chirality @xmath29 spinor products related to momentum invariants by @xmath30 @xmath31one - loop mhv amplitudes @xmath0 form @xcite : @xmath32 sum of @xmath33 functions over inequivalent functions cyclic ordering legs form @xmath2 universal depend legs negative helicity sum over box coefficients expressed logarithms dilogarithms via @xmath34 indices mod @xmath9 @xmath35 renormalisation scale forms @xmath36 @xmath37 depend @xmath9 odd or even @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 -\sum_{i=1}^{n/2 }{m-1}}{i-1 @xmath43 nmhv amplitudes calculated @xcite different forms from mhv amplitudes examine six - point amplitudesthree independent nmhv amplitudes constructed from one - mass box functions @xmath44 two - mass hard boxes @xmath45 special combinations @xmath46\left({-t_{i -t_i^{[2]}}{-t_{i[3 -t_{i+1}{[2]}}-t_{i[3 -t_{i+3}{[2]}}{-t_{i}{[3 ] -t_{i+4}{[2]}}{-t_{i{[3 ] -t_{i+2}{[2]}}{i[3 -t_{i+5}{[2]}} 2\left({-t_{i}{[2 ] -t_{i+3}{[2]}}{-t_{i+1}{[2 ] -t{[2]}_{i+4}}\left{-t_{i-1}{[2 ] -t_{i}^{[2]}}{-t_{i+1}{[2 ] -t_{i+2}{[2]}}\left({-t_{i+2}{[2]} -t_{i+3}{[2]}}\left({-t_{i+4}^{[2 ] -t_{i+5}^{[2 ]\right + \pi^2\over3}\\equn\label{wdef} dilogarithms drop out @xmath0 six - point amplitudes persists for external states gluons not beyond six points first @xmath0 amplitude @xmath47 coefficients @xmath48 @xmath49 function @xmath50 use @xmath53 @xmath54 other amplitudes @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 seven - point split helicity nmhv amplitude @xmath59 computed in ref @xcite remaining seven - point amplitudes in ref . @xcite generalisation to all-@xmath9 in ref detailed formulae in references increasing complexity seven - point amplitude is @xmath60 sum over all seven - point box functions formulae for 35 coefficients ref . @xcite and few coefficients absent @xmath59 29 non - vanishing coefficients @xmath61 35 coefficients non - zero implemented expressions of ref .@xcite study seven eight - point nmhv amplitudes present numerical study approximate universality @xmath0 one - loop amplitudes four- five - point amplitudes be mhv exact universality start study six - point amplitudes functional forms components in @xcite implementation mathematica components calculated specific kinematic point evaluated by ellis giele zandereghi @xcite examine amplitudes at kinematic point using published numerical values table sixpointn4 extract @xmath0 amplitudes split into @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath62 pieces combination @xmath63 if amplitudes universal identical each helicity configuration numerical value tree amplitude embedded table coefficient @xmath6 @xmath64 included single mhv amplitude combination @xmath63 identical despite different analytic forms nmhv expressions amplitudes numerically almost universal six - gluon @xmath0 amplitudes at egz kinematic point no accidents quantum field theory almost universal nature one - loop amplitudes studied seen approximate universality in maximally supersymmetric gauge theory not pure gauge theory minimally supersymmetric theories @xmath65 supergravity contributions to scattering determined by tree amplitude explanations amplitude infrared behaviour or broken symmetry dual conformal symmetry to explore behaviour beyond loop relate to results in @xmath66-matrix super - yang mills explore approximate universality in theories twistor string theory bjerrum - bohr d dunbar h. ita perkins k. risager jhep * 0612 * ( 2006 ) 072 [ hep - th/0610043 ] bern - dunbar jhep 0505 ( 2005 ) 056 [ hep - th/0501137 ] bern carrasco d forde h ita johansson 77 * ( 2008 ) 025010 arxiv:0707.1035 [ hep - th bjerrum - bohr p. vanhove jhep * 0810 * ( 2008 ) 006 arxiv:0805.3682 | 0.430939 | 2,924 | 1,514 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,633 | we present a fast and robust cluster update algorithm that is especially efficient in implementing the task of image segmentation using the method of superparamagnetic clustering . we apply it to a potts model with spin interactions that are
are defined by gray - scale differences within the image .
motivated by biological systems , we introduce the concept of neural inhibition to the potts model realization of the segmentation problem .
including the inhibition term in the hamiltonian results in enhanced contrast and thereby significantly improves segmentation quality . as a second benefit we can - after equilibration - directly identify the image segments as the clusters formed by the clustering algorithm . to construct a new spin configuration the algorithm performs the standard steps of ( 1 ) forming clusters and of ( 2 ) updating the spins in a cluster simultaneously . as opposed to standard algorithms , however , we share the interaction energy between the two steps . thus the update probabilities are not independent of the interaction energies . as a consequence
, we observe an acceleration of the relaxation by a factor of 10 compared to the swendson and wang procedure .
the segmentation of images into connected areas or objects is a formidable task and an important step in the process of recognition .
nature provides us with many examples of biological systems that solve this and other tasks related to the recognition problem in highly efficient ways . taken as such
, the problem is ill - defined : one will distinguish different numbers of objects in a noisy picture depending on the level of contrast and resolution .
a physicists answer to the problem has been presented by the method of ` superparamagnetic clustering of data ' @xcite where the pixels of an image are represented by a potts model of spins which interact in such a way that neighboring spins corresponding to similar pixels tend to align .
then the image - segments ( or objects ) may be identified as subsets or clusters of correlated spins at a given temperature . at high temperature
one will find a disordered paramagnetic phase while , when lowering the temperature , superparamagnetic phases occur with clusters of aligned spins . from a theoretical point of view
any method of simulating a given spin system is equivalent as long as it preserves general concepts such as detailed balance . for practical purposes
it is of course desirable to choose a method that is efficient and best adapted to the model .
cluster update algorithms are commonly used to to accelerate the equilibration of large spin systems @xcite .
as opposed to single spin updates following a metropolis procedure , these algorithms provide a method to update connected clusters of aligned spins simultaneously .
our approach to the problem is twofold : on the one hand we introduce to the spin model the concept of ( 1 ) _ global inhibition _ , motivated by the analogy to neural visual systems@xcite , on the other hand ( 2 )
we have developed a novel cluster algorithm that utilizes the energy landscape , which underlies the equilibration process , in a more efficient way .
\(1 ) the concept of global inhibition is found in many biological neural networks and has successfully been applied also in neural computation @xcite .
we implement it by adding a small global penalty for spins to align .
it serves to identify different clusters by different spin labels without need to observe the spin correlations over a longer time period .
\(2 ) in a cluster update algorithm the clusters are formed by `` freezing '' bonds between aligned spins with some probability . commonly the clusters are then updated independently . we update the clusters taking into account also the interactions on bonds that were not frozen .
in addition the inner surface of the larger clusters is reduced by incorporating islands that they might contain .
both of our improvements are implemented while preserving detailed balance . as a result
, we observe a significant increase in quality and speed . without loss of generality in the following
we will use the problem of segmenting an image into individual objects as an example to describe our approach . specifically , given a picture in form of color ( or gray - scale ) values @xmath0 on the @xmath1 sites of a finite @xmath2 lattice , we have the clustering problem : find ` objects ' i.e. clusters of almost the same color .
we define for each pair of nearest neighbors or _ bond _
@xmath3 on the lattice the distance @xmath4 and the mean distance @xmath5 averaged over all bonds . to perform the clustering task
we assign a spin variable @xmath6 to each site @xmath7 and for each bond @xmath3 an interaction strength @xmath8 with the normalization in eq.([gray ] ) the color of sites @xmath9 is assumed to be similar when the gray value distance @xmath10 is smaller than the average .
then the interaction strength is positive with a maximum value of @xmath11 for equal color .
we implement the spin model in such a way that for neighboring sites with similar color the spins have the tendency to align . for this purpose
we use a @xmath12-state potts model with the hamiltonian @xmath13 here , @xmath14 denotes that @xmath9 are nearest neighbors connected by a bond @xmath3 and @xmath15 is the kronecker delta function .
the second term is introduced in analogy to neural systems , where it is generally called `` global inhibition '' .
it serves to favor different spin values for spins in different clusters as explained below .
this is a concept realized in many neural systems that perform recognition tasks .
the segmentation problem is then solved by finding clusters of correlated spins in the low temperature equilibrium states of the hamiltonian @xmath16 .
we perform this task by implementing a clustering algorithm : in a first step the ` satisfied ' bonds , i.e. those that connect nearest neighbor pairs of identical spins @xmath17 are identified .
the satisfied bonds @xmath3 are then ` frozen ' with some probability @xmath18 .
sites connected by frozen bonds define the clusters . each cluster
is then updated by assigning to all spins inside the cluster the same new value .
commonly this is done independently for each cluster @xcite . in that sense
the external bonds connecting the clusters are ` deleted ' .
here , we use a more general cluster algorithm .
when choosing a new spin configuration we take these bonds into account . to preserve detailed balance , we adjust the bond freezing probabilities @xmath18 and the interaction on the external bonds .
our cluster update algorithm , which we call energy - sharing cluster update ( ecu ) is divided in two basic steps .
similar to the swendson & wang cluster algorithm @xcite also in our approach the temperature remains fixed and no annealing takes place between the iterations .
* as for any cluster update we first identify the _ satisfied _ bonds @xmath3 with @xmath17 and freeze these with probability @xmath19 when @xmath20 and @xmath21 . here
@xmath22 is the product of the boltzmann constant @xmath23 and temperature @xmath24 .
+ the additional coefficients @xmath25 with @xmath26 allow us to `` share '' the interaction energy with the following additional steps .
if one chooses @xmath27 then one obtains the usual swendson - wang clusters which may then be updated independently . * in an intermediate step we identify ` invisible ' islands i.e. clusters according to step ( 1a ) that have a boundary only with _
one _ other cluster and have the same spin value .
these islands often delay the spin flip of the larger cluster in step ( 2 ) as their total boundary may be large . for this reason we want to remove them with some finite probability .
this step is not indispensable for our algorithm but it further improves its performance .
we freeze the bonds between an island and the surrounding cluster with probability @xmath28 where @xmath29 if @xmath3 is a bond connecting an island with a surrounding cluster after step ( 1 ) and otherwise @xmath30 .
we impose the condition @xmath31 .
note that we do not increase the bond freezing probability beyond the swendson - wang probability and no size limit for the islands is implied . *
finally we identify the clusters @xmath32 of spins connected by frozen bonds after steps ( 1a ) and ( 1b ) . on this system of clusters that in similar approaches is referred to as a hyperlattice
@xcite we perform a metropolis update that updates all spins in each cluster simultaneously to a common new label .
the metropolis rate is calculated using the modified hamiltonian @xmath33 as has been shown on general grounds in @xcite detailed balance is preserved under the condition that in the modified hamiltonian one uses @xmath34 .
this amounts to sharing the interaction energy between the clustering and updating steps .
note that the inhibition term in eq .
( [ 3 ] ) does not enter the bond freezing probabilities .
for the cluster update it has the effect of favoring a different spin value for each cluster .
we have tested the performance of the proposed segmentation method based on the hamiltonian @xmath16 in eq .
( 2 ) with a finite inhibition of @xmath35 in combination with the ecu cluster update algorithm with energy sharing parameters @xmath36 . to our experience
the efficiency of the algorithm does not depend sensitively on these parameters .
further refinements may be added to improve the segmentation delivered by the ecu algorithm to cope with more delicate recognition problems @xcite .
we have compared the algorithm to the performance of other known segmentation methods . as methods of reference
we have used in particular the method of simulated annealing and the method of superparamagnetic clustering @xcite without inhibition ( @xmath37 ) using the standard swendson&wang ( sw ) update .
in addition we have tested a variant of the sw update that allows to freeze anti - ferromagnetic bonds @xmath3 when @xmath38 .
an example that illustrates the different solutions to the segmentation problem is shown in fig .
1 . let us explain this comparison in some detail .
the gray scale values that define the interactions @xmath39 according to eq .
( 1 ) are taken from fig .
1a .
some noise is included in this input .
all segmentation methods that we consider use @xmath40 state spin variables @xmath41 .
a random initial configuration of the spins is shown in terms of a gray scale picture in fig .
1b . as a first reference
we show the sequence of a simulated annealing procedure in fig .
1c and 1d . here , the hamiltonian @xmath16 in eq .
( 2 ) with @xmath37 is used to define the metropolis rate of local spin updates @xcite . after each sweep of @xmath1 spin updates the temperature
is lowered by a constant factor @xmath42 @xcite .
we started with a temperature @xmath43 and lowered by @xmath44 in 1c and @xmath45 in 1d for each sweep .
the spin configurations at intermediate steps are shown in fig .
1c and 1d . in the slower annealing procedure the two large rectangles in the image
are segmented according to the original picture while the finer structure is not recognized by this algorithm .
when the faster schedule is applied as in 1d then even the larger connected areas are divided into artificial segments .
obviously the simulated annealing method is inefficient for the segmentation task and due to slowing down at low temperatures the local update is very time consuming . even optimizing the annealing rate during the schedule can not change this picture as an extremely slow rate is needed to indentify the fine structure of the thin border line . in fig .
1e - g we compare different cluster update algorithms that avoid the problem of slowing down and we test the influence of the inhibition term and the energy sharing that are included only in fig . 1 g . comparing the series of spin configurations in fig .
1e and 1 g one notices that the inhibition term in 1 g indeed introduces a forced contrast between different segments as compared to 1e , in particular at @xmath46 and @xmath47 .
also the increase in speed is remarkable .
+ in fig .
1f we test a cluster update algorithm @xcite that includes anti - ferromagnetic clustering where in the clustering step ( 1a ) anti - ferromagnetic bonds with @xmath38 and @xmath48 are frozen with probability @xmath49 $ ] .
the clusters defined by ferro- and anti - ferromagnetic bonds are updated while preserving @xmath17 on the ferro- and @xmath48 on the anti - ferromagnetic bonds .
this method introduces additional contrast between areas of different input color but it fails at low temperature where artifacts are generated due to the noise in the input .
the convergence characteristic of the different algorithms is shown in fig .
[ compare]h , where the energy of the spin - lattice is plotted as a function of time at fixed temperature .
the relaxation time of the ecu - algorithm is about 10 times faster than that of the other algorithms .
let us note that the only parameters that enter our segmentation method are the factors of proportionality @xmath50 that determine the share of energy for the bond freezing steps and the inhibition strength @xmath51 .
mainly the @xmath52-parameters are relevant for the efficiency of the segmentation while @xmath51 indroduces some contrast to the representation of the clusters in terms of spin values .
we have not attempted to optimize the choice of the parameters to speed the segmentation of fig .
1a .
rather we are interested in a general purpose algorithm and we have successfully tested the robustness of the ecu segmentation with the present choice of parameters for many different pictures . to demonstrate this robustness we show three examples in fig . 2 .
despite the bad quality of the input a usable segmentation was found within a small number of iterations . a seemingly continuous gray scale background in fig .
2a is segmented into only few clusters identifying the foreground character . in fig .
2b we illustrate that for practical purposes , in this case detection of the license plate , even an intermediate iteration step , here @xmath53 , may be used without need to wait for equilibration ( at @xmath54 ) .
fig.2c shows the quality of segmentation for a highly complicated picture .
data clustering becomes tremendously complicated when the intrinsic correlation between the data points which belong to the same cluster is small .
a situation like this always occurs if the clusters extend into a thin , thread - like shape or an almost fractal structure , for example when dealing with images of biomolecules , polymers , or stellar structures .
the ecu makes better use of the energy landscape which underlies the clustering problem by _ sharing energy _ between the bond - freezing and the spin - update steps of the algorithm .
the additionally introduced global inhibition enhances contrast . as a consequence the quality of the results improves and
, most notably , energy sharing leads to an acceleration of the segmentation by about a factor of ten ( fig .
[ compare ] h ) .
in the course of development of the modern cluster update algorithms similar ideas have been proposed on sometimes more general grounds .
kandel and domany @xcite lay out how to preserve detailed balance for a broad class of algorithms and they show how several other proposed update variants @xcite may be rephrased to comply with this .
the ecu algorithm is also embedded in this framework .
niedermayer @xcite shows that in the clustering step ( 1a ) any function @xmath55 can be used in principle , but proposes for practical purposes to apply @xmath56 $ ] with some appropriately chosen @xmath57 . with this choice the contribution of the non - frozen bonds to the update is clipped at @xmath57 . in our case
we share the energies in a proportional way between the clustering and update steps .
the alignment of clusters is thus enhanced by also including the stronger bonds with higher energy content .
+ in summary , the recognition task of segmenting an image may be performed with high efficiency by a simple cluster update algorithm if global inhibition is implemented .
furthermore , we believe that our cluster update approach may also be useful for the simulation of other spin models as its efficiency is not dependent on the special properties of the potts model we use here . | the authors acknowledge the support of the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft , f.w . by grant sfb509 and c.v.f . by sfb237 . here
, we generalize the sum over @xmath58 in eq .
( 2 ) to include all sites @xmath9 with lattice coordinates @xmath59 and @xmath60 such that @xmath61 and @xmath62 . to achieve a visible segmentation in fig .
1c and 1d we use @xmath63 . | authors acknowledge support deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft grant sfb509 sfb237 generalize sum @xmath58 include sites @xmath9 lattice coordinates @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 visible segmentation fig 1c 1d use @xmath63 | 0.067206 | 110 | 62 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,647 | in this paper , we study the problem of finding the largest possible set of @xmath0 points and @xmath0 lines in a projective plane of order @xmath1 , such that that none of the @xmath0 points lie on any of the @xmath0 lines .
we prove that @xmath2 .
we also show that equality can be attained in this bound whenever @xmath1 is an even power of two . | suppose @xmath3 is a projective plane of order @xmath1 , where @xmath4 is the set of points and @xmath5 is the set of lines in @xmath6 . for @xmath7 and @xmath8
, we say that @xmath9 is a _ nonincident _ set of points and lines if @xmath10 for every @xmath11 and every @xmath12 .
define @xmath13 to be the maximum integer @xmath0 such that there exists a nonincident set of @xmath0 points and @xmath0 lines in @xmath6 .
equivalently , @xmath13 is the size of the largest square submatrix of zeroes in the incidence matrix of @xmath6 .
we use a simple combinatorial argument to prove the upper bound @xmath14 , which holds for any projective plane @xmath6 of order @xmath1 .
we also show that this bound is tight in certain cases , namely , for the desarguesian plane pg@xmath15 when @xmath1 is an even power of two .
this is done by utilising maximal arcs .
[ t1 ] for any set @xmath16 of @xmath0 points in a projective plane of order @xmath1 , the number of lines disjoint from @xmath16 is at most @xmath17 suppose that @xmath18 is a projective plane of order @xmath1 . for a subset @xmath19 of @xmath0 points , define @xmath20 and define @xmath21 .
furthermore , for every @xmath22 , define @xmath23 , and then define @xmath24 .
observe that @xmath25 consists of the nonempty intersections of the lines in @xmath5 with the set @xmath16 .
denote @xmath26 .
we will study the set system @xmath27 .
we have the following equations : @xmath28 from the above equations , it follows that @xmath29 the @xmath30 blocks in @xmath25 through any point @xmath11 contain the @xmath31 points in @xmath32 once each , as well as @xmath30 occurrences of @xmath33 .
so the average size of a block in @xmath25 that contains any given point @xmath34 is @xmath35 .
therefore we define @xmath36 and compute as follows : @xmath37 from which it follows that @xmath38 therefore , @xmath39 _ remark . _ the inequality @xmath40 that we proved above
is in fact a well - known result that has been proven in many different guises over the years .
for example , mullin and vanstone @xcite proved that @xmath41 in any @xmath42 design on @xmath43 points .
if we let @xmath44 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 , then we obtain @xmath40 . if there exists a nonincident set of @xmath0 points and @xmath47 lines in a projective plane of order @xmath1 , then @xmath48 before proving our next general result , we look at a small example . in figure
[ plot1.fig ] , we graph the functions @xmath49 and @xmath0 for @xmath50 and @xmath51 . the point of intersection is @xmath52 and it is then easy to see that @xmath53 for any projective plane @xmath6 of order @xmath54 .
, width=340 ] in general , it is easy to compute the point of intersection of these two functions as follows : @xmath55 since @xmath56 , the point of intersection occurs when @xmath57 the following result is now straightforward . [ main.thm ] for any projective plane @xmath6 of order @xmath1 , it holds that @xmath58 .
suppose there is a nonincident set of @xmath0 points and @xmath0 lines in a projective plane of order @xmath1 .
theorem [ t1 ] implies that @xmath59 .
however , for @xmath60 , we have that @xmath61 , just as in the example considered above .
it follows that @xmath62 .
next , we examine the case of equality in theorem [ t1 ] .
this will involve maximal arcs , which we now define .
maximal @xmath63-arc _ in a projective plane of order @xmath1 is a set @xmath16 of @xmath0 points such that every line meets @xmath16 in @xmath64 or @xmath65 points .
it is well - known that a maximal @xmath63-arc has @xmath66 and the number of lines that intersect the maximal arc is precisely @xmath67 . for additional information on maximal arcs , see @xcite .
[ c3 ] suppose we have a set @xmath16 of @xmath0 points in a projective plane of order @xmath1 such that the number of lines disjoint from @xmath16 is equal to @xmath17 then @xmath16 is a maximal @xmath63-arc , where @xmath68 .
conversely , if @xmath16 is a maximal @xmath63-arc in a projective plane of order @xmath1 , then number of lines disjoint from @xmath16 is equal to @xmath49 . from the proof of theorem [ t1 ] , it is easy to see that equality holds if and only if every line in @xmath69 meets @xmath16 in exactly @xmath65 points , where @xmath36
. it immediately follows that every line in the plane meets @xmath16 in @xmath64 or @xmath65 points , and therefore @xmath16 is a maximal arc .
the converse follows from the basic properties of maximal arcs mentioned above .
[ even.thm ] when @xmath1 is an even power of @xmath70 , there exist nonincident sets of @xmath0 points and @xmath0 lines in pg@xmath15 , where @xmath71 .
denniston @xcite proved that there is a maximal @xmath72-arc in pg@xmath73 whenever @xmath74 .
suppose @xmath43 is even and we take @xmath75 .
therefore we have a maximal @xmath63-arc , where @xmath76 , @xmath77 and @xmath71 .
suppose we take @xmath16 to be the @xmath0 points in the arc and we apply corollary [ c3 ] . since @xmath66 , there are exactly @xmath0 lines in @xmath78
. therefore we have a nonincident set of @xmath0 points and @xmath0 lines in pg@xmath15 . [ even.cor ] if @xmath1 is an even power of @xmath70 , then @xmath79 . from theorem [ even.thm ]
, we have @xmath80 .
however , @xmath81 from theorem [ main.thm ] .
it follows that @xmath79 . in the case where @xmath1 is odd ,
it was shown by ball , blokhuis and mazzocca @xcite that there is no nontrivial maximal arc in the desarguesian plane pg@xmath15 .
the existence of maximal arcs for nondesarguesian projective planes of odd order is unresolved at the present time .
thanks to douglas west for posing the problem studied in this paper , and for making useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper . | @xmath3 projective plane @xmath1 @xmath4 points lines in @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath9 nonincident points lines @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 define @xmath13 maximum integer @xmath0 nonincident points lines in @xmath6 @xmath13 size largest square submatrix zeroes in incidence matrix @xmath6 combinatorial argument upper bound @xmath14 holds projective plane @xmath6 @xmath1 bound tight cases desarguesian plane pg@xmath15 @xmath1 even power of two maximal arcs @xmath16 of @xmath0 points projective plane @xmath1 number lines disjoint from @xmath16 most @xmath17 @xmath18 projective plane @xmath1 subset @xmath19 of @xmath0 points define @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 define @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 nonempty intersections lines in @xmath5 with @xmath16 denote @xmath26 study set system @xmath27 equations : @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 blocks in @xmath25 @xmath11 contain @xmath31 points @xmath32 @xmath30 occurrences of @xmath33 average size of block in @xmath25 point @xmath34 is @xmath35 define @xmath36 compute @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 inequality @xmath40 well - known result proven mullin vanstone proved @xmath41 @xmath42 design on @xmath43 points @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 obtain @xmath40 nonincident set of @xmath0 points @xmath47 lines in projective plane order @xmath1 @xmath48 example figure graph functions @xmath49 @xmath0 for @xmath50 @xmath51 point of intersection is @xmath52 @xmath53 projective plane @xmath6 order @xmath54 compute point of intersection of functions @xmath55 point of intersection occurs when @xmath57 result straightforward projective plane @xmath6 order @xmath1 holds @xmath58 nonincident set of @xmath0 points @xmath0 lines in projective plane @xmath1theorem t1 ] implies @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 follows @xmath62 examine equality in theorem t1 ] maximal arcs maximal @xmath63-arc @xmath1 set @xmath16 of @xmath0 points line meets @xmath16 in @xmath64 or points maximal @xmath63-arc has @xmath66 lines @xmath67 additional information arcs see @xcite set @xmath16 of @xmath0 points @xmath1 number lines disjoint from @xmath16 equal to @xmath17 @xmath16 is maximal @xmath63-arc @xmath68 @xmath16 maximal @xmath63-arc @xmath1 number lines disjoint from @xmath16 equal to @xmath49 equality holds if line in @xmath69 meets @xmath16 in @xmath65 points every line meets @xmath16 in @xmath64 or @xmath65 points @xmath16 is maximal arc converse follows from properties maximal arcs @xmath1 even power of @xmath70 nonincident sets of @xmath0 points @xmath0 lines in@xmath15 where @xmath71denniston @xcite proved maximal @xmath72-arc pg@xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath43 even take @xmath75 maximal @xmath63-arc @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath71 take @xmath16 @xmath0 points arc apply corollary [ c3 ] @xmath66 @xmath0 lines in @xmath78 nonincident @xmath0 points @xmath0 lines pg@xmath15 @xmath1 even power @xmath70 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 main.thm follows @xmath79 @xmath1 odd shown ball blokhuis mazzocca @xcite no nontrivial maximal arc desarguesian plane pg@xmath15 maximal arcs nondesarguesian projective planes odd order unresolved thanks douglas west problem comments earlier drafts | 0.260808 | 1,648 | 939 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,651 | based on compton scattering and meson photoproduction data the polarizabilities of the nucleon are precisely studied and well understood due to recent experimental and theoretical work using nonsubtracted dispersion relations .
the _ recommended _ experimental values are @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 in units of @xmath8@xmath9 and @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 in units of @xmath8@xmath16 @xcite .
the numbers given in parentheses are predicted values .
it is shown that all versions of chiral effective field theories applied in analyses of nucleon polarizabilities and compton scattering ignore essential effects of @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 exchanges and of pseudoscalar @xmath20n coupling .
+ [ 1ex]martin schumacher + ii .
institut der universitt gttingen , friedrich - hund - platz 1 + d-37077 gttingen , germany | the description of compton scattering by the nucleon via dispersion theory was developed at the beginning of the 1960s @xcite . the theory made use of relations which may be denoted as @xmath21-channel dispersion relations and @xmath22-channel dispersion relations .
the singularities entering into the @xmath21-channel dispersion relations may be taken from meson photoproduction experiments , whereas the singularities entering into the @xmath22-channel dispersion relations are related to @xmath23 pairs created in two - photon reactions in case of the scalar @xmath22-channel , and to the @xmath24 meson in case of the pseudoscalar @xmath22-channel .
the first application of the scalar @xmath22-channel to the polarizabilities of the nucleon came with the work of j. bernabeu , t.e.o ericson et al .
( beft ) in 1974 @xcite where it was shown that the largest part of the electric polarizability and the total diamagnetic polarizability are due to the @xmath22-channel .
the smaller part of the electric polarizability is due to the `` pion cloud '' showing up as a nonresonant meson photoproduction process .
the paramagnetic polarizability is mainly due to the photoabsorption cross section provided by the @xmath25 resonance .
a convenient version of a dispersion theory applicable in a wide angular interval and at energies up to 1 gev was developed by lvov et al .
this dispersion theory is of the fixed-@xmath22 variety where @xmath21-channel integrals are carried out along integration paths at constant @xmath22 , and the @xmath22-channel contributions are taken care of in the form of `` asymptotic '' contributions , being an equivalent of the @xmath22-channel contributions . in principle
this version of dispersion theory is completely equivalent to other versions as there are fixed-@xmath26 dispersions theories or hyperbolic dispersion theories . at first sight
there appears to be a disadvantage in case of fixed-@xmath22 dispersion theories because the integration paths are partly located in the unphysical range of the scattering plane .
however , it has been shown by lvov et al .
@xcite that this only leads to minor technical problems which can be solved without loss of precision .
the validity of this latter statement has been clearly demonstrated by experiments , showing that fixed-@xmath22 dispersion theories lead to a precise representation of the experimental differential cross sections in the whole angular interval and at energies up to 1 gev @xcite . in this respect
the nonsubtracted dispersion theory differs from the subtracted dispersion theory @xcite which looses validity already at the peak energy of the @xmath27 resonance . for the spin - independent @xmath22-channel contribution
the assumption was made that it is possible to represent it via a scalar @xmath19-meson pole - term , in analogy to the well - known pseudoscalar @xmath24 pole term as entering into spindependent amplitudes . with this representation it was possible to arrive at agreement with experimental data in the angular and energy ranges described above , whereas without this representation of the pole term there remained a large discrepancy between prediction and the experimental data .
this implies that at energies of the second resonance region of the nucleon and large scattering angles the @xmath19-meson pole makes a dominant contribution to the compton differential cross section .
furthermore , the @xmath19-meson mass was determined to be @xmath28 mev @xcite in agreement with other available data .
these first investigations published in 2001 @xcite remained preliminary because the @xmath19-meson pole was only an ansatz at that time and there was an uncertainty about its validity .
this uncertainty has been removed in later investigations where it was shown that the @xmath19-meson pole term has a very firm theoretical basis and that the quantitative predictions calculated from well known properties of the @xmath19-meson are precise ( see @xcite for a summary ) . as a conclusion we may state that the dispersion theory of lvov et al .
@xcite is precise and well tested .
therefore , there are good reasons to trust in the evaluations of electromagnetic polarizabilities from low - energy compton - scattering data where use is made of this type of dispersion theory .
this is the case for all experimental data which are summarized in @xcite leading to the _ recommended _ nucleon polarizabilities given in the abstract . for the neutron also electromagnetic scattering of slow neutrons
has been taken into account .
furthermore , these _ recommended _ values are in excellent agreement with independent predictions obtained from high - precision cgln amplitudes @xcite and well - investigated properties of the @xmath19 meson without making use of experimental compton differential cross sections @xcite .
in addition to dispersion theory @xmath29eft plays a prominent rle in current investigations of nucleon compton scattering and polarizabilities .
the present investigation is motivated by the fact that recently @xmath29eft has been used as a tool for analyses of experimental differential cross sections for compton scattering by the proton , and results have been obtained which are considerable different from the well - founded standard values @xmath0 and @xmath30 .
examples are the chpt - investigation of beane et al .
@xcite where the values @xmath31 , @xmath32 have been obtained , and mcgovern et al .
@xcite where @xmath33 , @xmath34 have been obtained .
these values have been included in the data listing of the particle data group @xcite though the magnetic polarizabilities @xmath35 of @xcite deviate from the respective _ recommended _ value @xcite by a factor @xmath36 and the electric polarizability @xmath37 of @xcite by @xmath36 standard deviations .
these new results are based on the same set of experimental data as the previous ones @xcite so that the deviations are solely due to differences in the methods of data analysis .
it is obvious that the new analyses are justified only if they are superior to or at least of the same quality as the previous ones .
the purpose of the present work is to explore whether or not this is the case .
in a recent article @xcite a complete description of the present status of dispersion theory of nucleon compton scattering and polarizabilities has been given .
the _ recommended _ experimental polarizabilities introduced in the 2005 summary @xcite have been confirmed in the 2013 summary @xcite except for a slight correction applied to @xmath38 .
the reason for this slight correction was due to the fact that new high - precision analyses of cgln amplitudes have become available @xcite which made this revision necessary .
these new high - precision analyses @xcite were also of great importance in connection with the prediction of the @xmath21-channel components of the nucleon polarizabilities for all resonant and nonresonant excitation processes of the nucleon . results of these analyses which are of interest here are summarized in table [ tab1 ] .
.@xmath21-channel electromagnetic polarizabilities compared with experimental data . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ lensky ] the variants considered in @xcite are as follows : + i : the results for compton scattering with nucleon and @xmath24 born graphs ( tree graphs ) , plus polarizabilities as given by the counterterm ( c.t . ) .
+ ii : tree graphs plus the effects of the ( dressed ) @xmath27 @xmath21- and @xmath39-channel pole graphs .
+ iii : tree graphs plus @xmath20n loops : the @xmath40 calculation in heavy - baryon @xmath29eft without an explicit @xmath27 degree of freedom .
+ iv : as ( iii ) but with relativistic nucleon propagator in the @xmath20n and @xmath41 loops .
+ v : the @xmath42 calculation in heavy - baryon @xmath29eft with explicit @xmath27 , including tree graphs , @xmath27 poles and hb @xmath20n and @xmath41 loops .
+ vi : as ( v ) , but with relativistic nucleon propagators in the @xmath20n and @xmath41 loops .
according to the authors @xcite all of these variants of @xmath29eft are based on the same low - energy symmetries of qcd and in this sense are equivalent .
but only the last two versions v and vi in table [ lensky ] are realistic calculations which can be compared with experimental compton differential cross sections in the resonance region and some way below .
a comparison with experimental data at angles from @xmath43 to @xmath44 shows that these two variants of @xmath29eft which both include the leading @xmath20n loop effects and an explicit @xmath27 are quite similar , provided the counterterms ( c.t . )
are included and adjusted to yield identical values for the scalar dipole polarizabilities .
however , the values found for the two sets of counterterms in the @xmath29eft variants considered here are rather different .
they are particularly large in the @xmath45 calculation ( column v ) , especially as compared to the relativistic @xmath41 one ( column vi ) .
the statements of the authors @xcite cited in the forgoing paragraph indicate that in case of @xmath29efts a major part of the interest is directed to the low - energy symmetries of qcd , whereas the precision of the numbers attributed to the different components of the polarizabilities is of secondary importance .
this attitude contrasts with the aim of the non - subtracted dispersion theory where methods have been developed which lead to a high precision of the different components of the polarizabilities .
for the data analysis certainly high precision is required .
\(i ) the analysis of compton scattering and polarizabilities in terms of nonsubtracted dispersion relations is precise and well tested experimentally in a large angular range and at energies up to 1 gev . in this respect
the nonsubtracted dispersion theory differs from the subtracted dispersion theory @xcite where the latter looses validity already at the peak energy of the @xmath27 resonance .
+ ( ii ) the polarizabilities of the nucleon are determined from experimental data in two ways , firstly by adjusting the predictions of the nonsubtracted dispersion theory to the experimental differential cross sections for compton scattering in the low - energy domain below the @xmath25 peak and secondly by calculating them from the @xmath21-channel and @xmath22-channel singularities as provided by high - precision analyses of cgln amplitudes and well known properties of the scalar @xmath22-channel . in the latter case
no use is made of compton scattering differential cross sections .
the results obtained by these two methods are in excellent agreement with each other .
the paper of beane et al .
@xcite cited in the introduction is essentially of the variety iii in table [ lensky ] .
the amplitude for unpolarized compton scattering is expanded in powers of the parameter @xmath46 used in efts , representing a typical external momentum . to @xmath47 the polarizabilities
are given by pion - loop effects and lead to the hbchpt prediction . at @xmath48
there are new long - range contributions to these polarizabilities .
four new parameters also appear which encode contributions of short - distance physics to the spin - independent polarizabilities .
thus one needs four pieces of experimental data to fix these four short - distance contributions .
after these adjustment to experimental data have been carried out good fits to experimental differential cross sections have been obtained .
the paper of mc govern et al .
@xcite cited in the introduction includes effects of the @xmath27-resonance and , therefore , essentially is of the variety v in table [ lensky ] . the foregoing analysis has shown that by `` integrating out '' @xmath18- and @xmath17- degrees of freedom and by using the derivative coupling alone , the @xmath49 component of the electric polarizability predicted by chpt is increased by a factor @xmath50 compared to the correct empirical value .
furthermore , by carrying out the kinematical modifications entering into hbchpt a further increase by a factor of 1.7 ( proton ) and 1.2 ( neutron ) is obtained .
the `` integrating out '' of the @xmath19-meson leads to the omission of the major part , @xmath51 , of the electric polarizability and to the omission of the diamagnetic polarizability @xmath52 .
the author is indebted to a.i .
lvov , v. pascalutsa and h.w .
griesshammer for valuable comments .
m. schumacher , eur .
j. a * 30 * ( 2006 ) 413 , erratum * 32 * ( 2007 ) 121 , [ hep - ph/0609040 ] ; m.i .
levchuk , a.i .
lvov , a.i .
milstein , m. schumacher , proceedings of the workshop on the physics of excited nucleons , world scientific , nstar 2005 ( 2005 ) 389 , [ hep - ph/0511193 ] . | description compton scattering by nucleon via dispersion theory developed 1960s @xcite theory @xmath21-channel @xmath22-channel singularities @xmath21-channel taken from meson photoproduction experiments @xmath22-channel related to @xmath23 pairs in two - photon reactions scalar @xmath22-channel @xmath24 meson pseudoscalar @xmath22-channel first application scalar @xmath22-channel to polarizabilities nucleon work j. bernabeu ericson et al 1974 @xcite largest part electric polarizability diamagnetic polarizability due to @xmath22-channel smaller part polarizability due to pion cloud '' nonresonant meson photoproduction process paramagnetic polarizability due to photoabsorption cross section by @xmath25 resonance dispersion theory wide angular interval energies up to 1 gev developed by lvov et al fixed-@xmath22 variety @xmath21-channel integrals carried along integration paths at constant @xmath22 @xmath22-channel contributions asymptotic contributions equivalent to other fixed-@xmath26 hyperbolic dispersion theoriesdisadvantage fixed-@xmath22 dispersion theories integration paths in unphysical range scattering plane shown by lvov et al . @xcite leads to minor technical problems without loss precision validity demonstrated by experiments fixed-@xmath22 dispersion theories lead precise representation experimental differential cross sections angular interval energies up to 1 gev nonsubtracted dispersion theory differs from subtracted @xcite looses validity at peak energy @xmath27 resonance spin - independent @xmath22-channel contribution represent via scalar @xmath19-meson pole - term pseudoscalar @xmath24 pole spindependent amplitudes agreement with experimental data angular energy ranges without large discrepancy between prediction experimental data implies energies second resonance region large scattering angles @xmath19-meson pole dominant contribution to compton differential cross section @xmath19-meson mass determined @xmath28 mev @xcite agreement with data first investigations in 2001 preliminary @xmath19-meson pole ansatz uncertainty about validityuncertainty removed later investigations @xmath19-meson pole term firm theoretical basis quantitative predictions from properties precise see @xcite summary dispersion theory of lvov et al . @xcite precise well tested reasons trust in evaluations electromagnetic polarizabilities from low - energy compton - scattering data theory case for experimental data summarized in @xcite recommended nucleon polarizabilities neutron electromagnetic scattering of slow neutrons taken account recommended values with predictions from high - precision cgln amplitudes @xcite properties @xmath19 meson without experimental compton differential cross sections @xmath29eft in investigations nucleon compton scattering polarizabilities present investigation motivated @xmath29eft used for analyses experimental differential cross sections for compton scattering by proton results obtained different from standard values @xmath0 @xmath30 examples beane et al . @xcite values @xmath31 @xmath32 mcgovern et al . @xcite @xmath33 @xmath34values included in data particle data group @xcite magnetic polarizabilities @xmath35 deviate from recommended value by factor @xmath36 electric polarizability @xmath37 by @xmath36 standard deviations new results based on same experimental data as previous deviations due to differences in methods data analysis new analyses justified if superior to or same quality as previous purpose present work to explore recent article complete description of status of dispersion theory of nucleon compton scattering and polarizabilities given recommended experimental polarizabilities in 2005 summary confirmed in 2013 summary except slight correction to @xmath38 due to new high - precision analyses of cgln amplitudes available revision necessary analyses prediction of @xmath21-channel components nucleon polarizabilities for resonant and nonresonant excitation processes results summarized in table tab1@xmath21-channel electromagnetic polarizabilities compared with experimental data variants considered in @xcite are results for compton scattering with nucleon and @xmath24 born graphs plus polarizabilities as given by countertermii tree graphs effects @xmath27-channel pole graphs iii tree graphs @xmath20n loops @xmath40 calculation heavy - baryon @xmath29eft without @xmath27 freedom iv iii ) relativistic nucleon propagator @xmath20n @xmath41 loops v @xmath42 calculation heavy - baryon @xmath29eft @xmath27 tree graphs @xmath27 poles @xmath20n loops vi v ) relativistic nucleon propagators @xmath20n loops authors variants @xmath29eft low - energy symmetries qcd equivalent last two versions v vi realistic calculations compared experimental compton differential cross sections resonance region comparison experimental data @xmath43 to @xmath44 shows two variants @xmath29eft @xmath20n loop effects explicit @xmath27 similar counterterms included adjusted identical values scalar dipole polarizabilities values two counterterms @xmath29eft variants different large @xmath45 calculation column v ) compared relativistic @xmath41 one column vi )statements authors @xcite indicate @xmath29efts interest to low - energy symmetries qcd precision numbers polarizabilities secondary attitude contrasts with non - subtracted dispersion theory methods lead high precision data analysis high precision required analysis compton scattering polarizabilities nonsubtracted dispersion relations precise tested experimentally large angular range energies up to 1 gev nonsubtracted dispersion theory differs from @xcite looses validity at peak energy @xmath27 resonance polarizabilities nucleon determined from experimental data adjusting predictions nonsubtracted dispersion theory to experimental differential cross sections compton scattering low - energy domain below @xmath25 peak calculating from @xmath21-channel @xmath22-channel singularities high - precision analyses cgln amplitudes properties scalar @xmath22-channel no use compton scattering differential cross sections results two methods paper beane et al . @xcite cited variety iii in table [ lensky amplitude for unpolarized compton scattering expanded in powers parameter @xmath46 to @xmath47 polarizabilities given by pion - loop effects lead to hbchpt prediction@xmath48 new long - range contributions polarizabilities four parameters encode short - distance physics spin - independent polarizabilities needs four experimental data fix short - distance contributions adjustment good fits differential cross sections obtained paper mc govern et al includes effects @xmath27-resonance variety v table lensky analysis integrating @xmath18- @xmath17- degrees freedom derivative coupling @xmath49 electric polarizability increased factor @xmath50 empirical kinematical modifications hbchpt increase 1.7 proton ) 1.2 neutron ) integrating @xmath19-meson leads omission @xmath51 electric polarizability omission diamagnetic polarizability @xmath52 author indebted to lvov v. pascalutsa h griesshammer comments m. schumacher 30 * ( 2006 ) 413 erratum 32 * ( 2007 ) 121 hep - ph/0609040 ] levchuk lvov milstein schumacher proceedings workshop physics of excited nucleons world scientific nstar 2005 ( 2005 ) 389 hep - ph/0511193 ] | 0.440615 | 2,855 | 1,510 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,653 | pion photoproduction reactions are investigated in a dynamical coupled - channel approach based on the jlich @xmath0 model , which presently includes the hadronic @xmath0 and @xmath1 stable channels as well as the @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 effective channels .
this model has been quite successful in the description of @xmath5 scattering for center - of - mass energies up to @xmath6 gev .
the full pion photoproduction amplitude is constructed to satisfy the generalized ward - takahashi identity and hence , it is fully gauge invariant .
the calculated differential cross sections and photon spin asymmetries up to 1.65 gev center - of - mass energy for the reactions @xmath7 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 are in good agreement with the experimental data .
address = department of physics and astronomy , university of georgia , athens , ga 30602 , usa address = institut fr kernphysik and jlich center for hadron physics , forschungszentrum jlich , 52425 jlich , germany address = center for nuclear studies , department of physics , the george washington university , washington , dc 20052 , usa , altaddress = institut fr kernphysik and jlich center for hadron physics , forschungszentrum jlich , 52425 jlich , germany address = institut fr kernphysik and jlich center for hadron physics , forschungszentrum jlich , 52425 jlich , germany , altaddress = institute for advanced simulations , forschungszentrum jlich , 52425 jlich , germany address = department of physics and astronomy , university of georgia , athens , ga 30602 , usa , altaddress = institut fr kernphysik and jlich center for hadron physics , forschungszentrum jlich , 52425 jlich , germany | in the past few years , intensive experimental efforts have taken place at major laboratories around the world to study the baryon spectra using the electromagnetic probes . on the theoretical side ,
since the baryon resonances are unstable and couple strongly to baryon - meson continuum states , coupled - channel models are needed to analyze the experimental data and to interpret the extracted resonance parameters . for our present study
, we employ the well - known jlich @xmath0 model @xcite that is based on time - ordered perturbation theory .
it is a coupled - channel meson - exchange model which includes the @xmath0 and @xmath1 stable channels as well as the @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 effective channels accounting for the resonant part of the @xmath10 channel .
the interaction kernel corresponding to the @xmath11- and @xmath12-channel diagrams is constructed based on the chiral lagrangians of wess and zumino @xcite , supplemented by additional terms for the coupling of @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 @xcite . for the @xmath18-channel diagrams ,
apart from the bare nucleon dressed by the coupling to the @xmath0 continuum state to reproduce the physical nucleon , the interaction kernel includes eight genuine bare resonances , namely @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 and @xmath26 .
the bare genuine resonances get their dressed masses and widths from the re - scattering of the baryon - meson continuum states ; the @xmath27 ( roper ) resonance appears as a dynamically generated resonance due to the strong coupling of the @xmath0 and @xmath3 channels .
this hadronic model has been quite successful in reproducing the @xmath0 partial - wave amplitudes up to the center - of - mass energy of @xmath28 gev and for the total angular momentum states with @xmath29 and @xmath30 . in ref .
@xcite a dynamical coupled - channel model for pseudoscalar meson photoproduction based on a field - theoretical approach of haberzettl @xcite has been introduced in conjunction with the jlich hadronic coupled - channel model .
this photoproduction model is distinguished from the majority of the existing dynamical models by the fact that , in addition to satisfying unitarity and analyticity as a matter of course , it also satisfies the full gauge - invariance condition dictated by the generalized ward - takahashi identity .
by contrast , the vast majority of existing dynamical models satisfy only current conservation but not gauge invariance . in ref .
@xcite , a preliminary feasibility study of this field - theory approach was presented . in the present work ,
we carry out an extended and more quantitative calculation of the neutral and charged pion photoproduction reactions within this approach using the jlich @xmath0 model @xcite .
we calculate cross sections as well as the beam asymmetries up to @xmath31 gev .
the full single - meson photoproduction amplitude , @xmath32 , is obtained by attaching a photon everywhere into the dressed @xmath33 vertex , which gives @xcite @xmath34 where the first three terms describe the coupling of the photon to the external legs of the dressed @xmath33 vertex , with the subscripts @xmath18 , @xmath12 and @xmath11 referring to the appropriate mandelstam variables of their respective intermediate hadrons .
the last term @xmath35 is interaction current , where the photon couples inside the @xmath33 vertex . in our work
it is chosen as @xcite @xmath36 , \label{eq : mint2}\ ] ] where @xmath37 denotes the transverse part of @xmath38 ; @xmath39 stands for an undetermined transverse contact current taken to be zero in the present work for simplicity ; @xmath40 is the non - polar part of the hadronic scattering amplitude ; @xmath41 describes the free propagation of the intermediate meson - baryon two - body system .
@xmath42 is the generalized contact current as specified in ref .
@xcite ; it accounts for the complicated part of the interaction current which can not be treated explicitly . the amplitude @xmath43 in eq .
( 1 ) is given by @xmath44 where @xmath45 stands for the dressed @xmath46 vertex with @xmath47 denoting either the nucleon or baryon resonance , @xmath48 denotes the dressed baryon propagator .
the dressed hadronic vertices and propagators are determined by the hadron dynamics of the jlich @xmath0 coupled - channel model .
@xmath49 is the full dressed @xmath50 vertex as derived in ref .
differential cross sections for @xmath51 , @xmath52 and @xmath53 .
the solid curves show the results from the full calculation .
the dotted and the dashed curves are obtained by respectively switching off the loop integral or the contact current @xmath42 .
data are from ref . @xcite . ]
photon spin asymmetries for @xmath54 , @xmath52 and @xmath53 .
the solid curves show the results from the full calculation .
the dotted and the dashed curves are obtained by respectively switching off the loop integral or the contact current @xmath42 .
data are from ref . @xcite . ]
the parameters of the present pion photoproduction model are determined by fitting the differential cross section and the beam asymmetry data of the charged and neutral pion photoproduction up to @xmath31 gev .
they are listed in ref .
the calculated differential cross sections and beam asymmetries for @xmath55 , @xmath52 and @xmath56 are shown in figs .
[ fig : dsdo ] and [ fig : sa ] , respectively , together with the corresponding experimental data .
more results for differential cross sections and beam asymmetries at 13 additional energies from the @xmath0 threshold up to @xmath31 gev can be found in ref .
figure [ fig : sig ] shows the total cross sections for the three charged pion photoproduction channels .
note that the total cross - section data have not been included in our fit . in figs .
[ fig : dsdo]-[fig : sig ] , the solid curves correspond to the results of our full calculation , while the dotted and dashed curves are obtained by respectively switching off the loop integral and the contact current @xmath42 in the full amplitude .
one sees that our theoretical results for both the differential cross sections and beam asymmetries ( figs .
[ fig : dsdo ] and [ fig : sa ] ) as well as the total cross sections ( fig . [ fig : sig ] ) are in good agreement with the corresponding experimental data .
juli - daz _ et al .
_ @xcite have also performed an investigation of the single - pion photoproduction within the ebac dynamical coupled - channel model .
compared to our model , they included two additional resonances , namely @xmath57 and @xmath58 ; however , the @xmath59 channel was not analyzed in their work . compared with the results of ref .
@xcite , the agreement of our results with the data is a little bit better for both the @xmath60 and @xmath52 channels .
figures [ fig : dsdo]-[fig : sig ] also show clearly that the loop integral and the contact current @xmath42 are important for reproducing the data , which means that the coupled - channel effects _ and _ gauge invariance are essential for understanding the single - pion photoproduction reactions . while the importance of coupled - channel effects was pointed out already in ref .
@xcite , we emphasize here that the majority of existing dynamical models of photoproduction reactions are actually not gauge invariant since their amplitudes obey current conservation only .
the latter is shown in ref .
@xcite to be necessary but not sufficient for maintaining full gauge invariance across all levels of a microscopic description of the photoreaction .
the importance of fulfilling the gauge - invariance condition was also emphasized for the @xmath61 bremsstrahlung reaction @xcite .
total cross sections for @xmath62 , @xmath52 and @xmath53 .
the solid curves show the results from the full calculation . the dotted and
the dashed curves are obtained by respectively switching off the loop integral or the contact current @xmath42 .
data are taken from ref .
@xcite but not included in the fit.,scaledwidth=44.0% ] finally , we mention that the residues and pole positions of the full photoproduction amplitude are being evaluated in our model by making an analytic continuation of the amplitudes to complex energy plane .
the results will be published elsewhere .
this work is supported by the ffe grant no .
41788390 ( cosy-058 ) .
the authors acknowledge the research computing center at the university of georgia and the jlich supercomputing center at forschungszentrum jlich for providing computing resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this proceeding .
99 c. schtz , j. haidenbauer , j. speth , and j.w .
durso , _ phys .
c _ * 57 * , 1464 ( 1998 ) .
o. krehl , c. hanhart , s. krewald , and j. speth , _ phys .
c _ * 62 * , 025207 ( 2000 ) .
a.m. gasparyan , j. haidenbauer , c. hanhart , and j. speth , _ phys .
c _ * 68 * , 045207 ( 2003 ) .
j. wess and b. zumino , _ phys .
rev . _ * 163 * , 1727 ( 1967 ) .
h. haberzettl , k. nakayama , and s. krewald , _ phys .
c _ * 74 * , 045202 ( 2006 ) .
h. haberzettl , _ phys .
c _ * 56 * , 2041 ( 1997 ) .
f. huang , m. dring , h. haberzettl , s. krewald , and k. nakayama , in preparation .
cns data analysis center , the george washington university , http://gwdac.phys.gwu.edu .
b. juli - daz , t .- s.h .
lee , a. matsuyama , t. sato , and l.c .
smith , _ phys .
c _ * 77 * , 045205 ( 2008 ) .
k. nakayama and h. haberzettl , _ phys .
c _ * 80 * , 051001 ( 2009 ) . | past years experimental efforts laboratories baryon spectra using electromagnetic probes baryon resonances unstable couple strongly to baryon - meson continuum states coupled - channel models needed analyze data interpret resonance parameters present study employ jlich @xmath0 model @xcite based on time - ordered perturbation theory coupled - channel meson - exchange model includes @xmath0 @xmath1 stable channels @xmath2 @xmath4 effective channels resonant part @xmath10 channel interaction kernel @xmath11- @xmath12-channel diagrams constructed based on chiral lagrangians of wess zumino @xcite supplemented by additional terms for coupling @xmath13 @xcite @xmath18-channel diagrams continuum interaction kernel includes eight genuine bare resonances @xmath19 bare resonances get dressed masses widths from re - scattering baryon - meson continuum states @xmath27 resonance dynamically generated due to strong coupling @xmath0 @xmath3 channelshadronic model successful @xmath0 partial - wave amplitudes center - - mass energy @xmath28 gev total angular momentum states @xmath29 @xmath30 @xcite dynamical coupled - channel model pseudoscalar meson photoproduction field - theoretical approach haberzettl introduced with jlich hadronic coupled - channel model distinguished unitarity satisfies full gauge - invariance condition ward - takahashi identity majority models satisfy current conservation not gauge invariance @xcite preliminary feasibility study presented present work extended quantitative calculation neutral charged pion photoproduction reactions using jlich @xmath0 model calculate cross sections beam asymmetries up to @xmath31 gev full single - meson photoproduction amplitude @xmath32 obtained attaching photon into @xmath33 vertex @xcite @xmath34 first three terms coupling photon external legs vertex subscripts @xmath18 @xmath11 mandelstam variables hadrons last term @xmath35 interaction current photon couples inside @xmath33 vertexchosen @xcite @xmath36 @xmath37 transverse part @xmath38 undetermined transverse contact current zero @xmath40 non - polar hadronic scattering amplitude free propagation intermediate meson - baryon body system @xmath42 generalized contact current @xcite complicated interaction current amplitude @xmath43 by @xmath44 @xmath45 dressed @xmath46 vertex @xmath47 nucleon baryon resonance @xmath48 dressed baryon propagator hadronic vertices propagators determined by hadron dynamics @xmath0 coupled - channel model @xmath49 full dressed @xmath50 vertex differential cross sections for @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 solid curves calculation dotted dashed curves switching off loop integral contact current data from @xcite photon spin asymmetries for @xmath54 @xmath52 @xmath53 solid curves calculation dotted dashed curves switching off loop integral contact current data from @xcite parameters pion photoproduction model determined fitting differential cross section beam asymmetry data charged neutral pion photoproduction up to @xmath31listed in ref . calculated differential cross sections beam asymmetries for @xmath55 @xmath52 @xmath56 shown in figs sa experimental data more results for beam asymmetries at 13 additional energies from @xmath0 threshold up to @xmath31 gev in ref . figure sig shows total cross sections for three charged pion photoproduction channels total cross - section data not included in fit in solid curves correspond to full calculation dotted dashed curves obtained by switching off loop integral contact current @xmath42 in full amplitude theoretical results for differential cross sections beam asymmetries total cross sections agreement with experimental data juli - daz et al . @xcite single - pion photoproduction within ebac dynamical coupled - channel model included two additional resonances @xmath57 and @xmath58 @xmath59 channel not analyzed with agreement results with better for @xmath60 and @xmath52 channels figures loop integral contact current @xmath42 important for reproducing data coupled - channel effects gauge invariance essential for understanding single - pion photoproduction reactionsimportance of coupled - channel effects in ref @xcite majority dynamical models photoproduction reactions not gauge invariant amplitudes obey current conservation necessary not sufficient for full gauge invariance across photoreaction importance of gauge - invariance condition emphasized for @xmath61 bremsstrahlung reaction cross sections for @xmath62 @xmath52 @xmath53 solid curves show results from full calculation dotted dashed curves obtained by switching off loop integral or contact current @xmath42 data taken from ref @xcite not included in.0% residues pole positions of full photoproduction amplitude evaluated in model analytic continuation amplitudes to complex energy plane results published elsewhere supported by ffe grant 41788390 ( ) authors acknowledge research computing center at university of georgia jlich supercomputing center for computing resources research c. schtz j. haidenbauer j. speth durso _ phys . c * 57 *, 1464 ( 1998 ) krehl speth 62 025207 ( 2000 ) gasparyan 68 045207 ( 2003 )wess zumino. 163 1727 1967 ) h haberzettl k nakayama s krewald 74 045202 2006 ) haberzettl 56 2041 1997 ) f. huang m. dring h. haberzettl s krewald k nakayama preparation cns data analysis center george washington university.phys.gwu.edu juli - daz lee matsuyama t sato l phys. 77 * 045205 2008 ) k. nakayama h. haberzettl phys 80 * 051001 ( 2009 ) | 0.357078 | 2,414 | 1,223 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,654 | we notice that the existing literature about the reaction @xmath0 suffers from a mistake in the relative sign between the t - channel and u - channel graphs . correcting this
lowers the crosssections by about an order of magnitude . * the reaction @xmath1 recomputed . *
+ j.j .
lopez - villarejo@xmath2 , j.a.m .
vermaseren@xmath3 + [ 3 mm ] * departamento de fsica terica , c - xi , + universidad autnoma de madrid , + canto blanco , + e-28034 madrid , spain . *
nikhef , p.o .
box 41882 , + 1009 db , amsterdam , the netherlands | the reaction @xmath0 is an interesting one from the theoretical viewpoint . because the coupling of the higgs to electrons is proportional to the electron mass , the tree graphs are so small that the one loop contribution gives the dominant part of the crosssection .
this has been recognized in the past @xcite and it has been found that the crosssections are rather small . only for special higgs particles in for instance susy models can the crosssection be larger , mainly due to a bigger tree graph contribution . in principle
this would finish the subject if it were not for the fact that during a project in which we were testing methods we recalculated this reaction and found both papers to have a number of shortcomings
. correction of these altered the final numbers significantly .
of course this does nt mean that now this reaction will become important at a future ilc , but at least reports about the variety of reactions that may or may not be of interest can quote the correct numbers . and if there exist extra higgs particles the errors of the past can be avoided in the future .
the major problem with one loop calculations is that they involve much work .
hence we like to use symmetry arguments as much as possible to minimize the number of diagrams to compute .
a traditionally safe symmetry to use is either bose or fermi statistics when there are identical particles involved .
because there are two higgs particles involved , both previous papers have used this symmetry , but both got the relative sign of the diagrams wrong .
this is because they used an indirect argument that for identical particles the amplitude should be maximal at the region of overlap and the scattering at 90 degrees was seen as the region of overlap .
they adjusted the relative sign for this .
we will show in the next section that this is not the case and that actually at 90 degrees the amplitude is zero .
this diminishes the crosssection considerably .
we have verified this result with the use of the feynarts @xcite system and it agrees with our findings .
this letter is arranged as follows .
we start with explaining the relative sign of the graphs in the formulas , using the tree graphs as an example .
then we show the diagrams to compute and how the sign of the tree graphs transfers to the loop graphs .
because the calculation itself can be done in many ways and can even be done automatically with systems like feynarts , we do nt go into unnecessary details .
finally we present the new numbers and show a few distributions .
the lowest order of the reaction @xmath0 has in principle three diagrams , which we will label the t - channel , the u - channel and the s - channel graphs .
( 310,60)(0,0 ) ( 20,50)(50,50 ) ( 50,50)(50,10 ) ( 50,10)(20,10 ) ( 50,50)(80,50)3 ( 50,10)(80,10)3 ( 50,50)1.5 ( 50,10)1.5 ( 13,50)[]@xmath4 ( 13,10)[]@xmath5 ( 89,50)[]@xmath6 ( 89,10)[]@xmath7 ( 45,30)[r]@xmath8 ( 100,30)[]@xmath9 ( 120,50)(150,50 ) ( 150,50)(150,10 ) ( 150,10)(120,10 ) ( 150,50)(180,10)3 ( 150,10)(180,50)3 ( 150,50)1.5 ( 150,10)1.5 ( 113,50)[]@xmath4 ( 113,10)[]@xmath5 ( 189,50)[]@xmath6 ( 189,10)[]@xmath7 ( 145,30)[r]@xmath10 ( 200,30)[]@xmath9 ( 220,50)(240,30 ) ( 240,30)(220,10 ) ( 240,30)(270,30)3 ( 270,30)(290,10)3 ( 270,30)(290,50)3 ( 240,30)1.5 ( 270,30)1.5 ( 213,50)[]@xmath4 ( 213,10)[]@xmath5 ( 299,50)[]@xmath6 ( 299,10)[]@xmath7 ( 255,25)[t]@xmath11 + fig .
1 : the three tree graphs for the reaction @xmath12 because of the very small coupling of the higgs to the electron these diagrams are suppressed by powers of @xmath13 which is a number that is less than @xmath14 .
the t - channel and u - channel graphs have two of such powers and the s - channel graph has only one .
let us however , for study purposes , look at the t - channel and u - channel graphs assuming that the coupling is a fixed constant c that does nt depend on the electron mass . in that case
the amplitude for the t - channel graph becomes : @xmath15 using the dirac equation in the limit that the electron mass goes to zero this gives @xmath16 for the u - channel diagram we have to exchange @xmath6 and @xmath7 and hence also @xmath8 and @xmath10 which gives @xmath17 in which we replaced @xmath7 by @xmath18 and the @xmath4 and @xmath5 can be removed with the dirac equation .
it is this change in sign , which at first looks counter intuitive , that caused all the problems because this way the sum of the t - channel and u - channel graphs becomes proportional to @xmath19 : @xmath20 and the result is that at 90 degrees this part of the amplitude vanishes .
the complete matrix element is still invariant under the exchange of @xmath8 and @xmath10 as @xmath21 and @xmath22 are invariant under this exchange and all @xmath8 and @xmath10 dependence can be written in terms of these two variables .
their contribution to the full matrix element becomes : @xmath23 we leave out the s - channel graph because the equivalent one loop graphs are not important : they always vanish in the limit that the electron mass is put to zero .
let us see how this works out at the one loop level .
( 280,60)(0,0 ) ( 20,50)(50,50 ) ( 50,50)(50,10 ) ( 50,10)(20,10 ) ( 50,50)(90,50)34.5 ( 90,50)(90,10)34.5 ( 90,10)(50,10)34.5 ( 90,50)(120,50)3 ( 90,10)(120,10)3 ( 50,50)1.5 ( 50,10)1.5 ( 90,50)1.5 ( 90,10)1.5 ( 13,50)[]@xmath4 ( 13,10)[]@xmath5 ( 129,50)[]@xmath6 ( 129,10)[]@xmath7 ( 70,45)[t]@xmath24 ( 85,30)[r]@xmath24 ( 70,15)[b]@xmath24 ( 160,50)(190,50 ) ( 190,50)(190,10 ) ( 190,10)(160,10 ) ( 190,50)(230,50)34.5 ( 230,50)(230,10)3 ( 230,10)(190,10)34.5 ( 230,50)(260,50)3 ( 230,10)(260,10)3 ( 190,50)1.5 ( 190,10)1.5 ( 230,50)1.5 ( 230,10)1.5 ( 153,50)[]@xmath4 ( 153,10)[]@xmath5 ( 269,50)[]@xmath6 ( 269,10)[]@xmath7 ( 210,45)[t]@xmath24 ( 227,30)[r]@xmath25 ( 210,15)[b]@xmath24 + fig .
2 : some one loop graphs in the reaction @xmath12 there are two types of diagrams : the ones with the vector bosons and the ones with the ghosts . as it turns out , the ones with the vector bosons are the easier ones as they involve only one power of the loop momentum in the numerator . due to the dirac equation and the fact that the loop momentum gives us , after integration , only lorenz tensors that involve the external momenta only the box diagrams are nonzero in the limit that the electron mass becomes zero .
if the terms in a diagram have only an odd number of gamma matrices ( @xmath26 counts as an even number for these purposes ) , eventually the diagram becomes of the type @xmath27 and when exchanging @xmath28 and @xmath29 we get the same minus sign as before .
this is different for an even number of gamma matrices where we have a relative plus sign . in the case of the standard model
however we have only diagrams with an odd number of gamma matrices when we put the electron mass equal to zero . while doing the calculation we ran into another problem with reference @xcite .
their figures show a rather strange and unphysical behaviour when the higgs mass is varied .
we could track this down to the exchange of two indices in a tensor in their equation 8 .
once this is corrected we get a much more physical behaviour although we still do nt get exactly the same result .
there are however not enough details to investigate this further .
we do nt understand the statement in reference @xcite that they agree with the previous paper as they seem to have only a problem with the relative sign of the diagrams .
for the rest the calculation was rather standard .
we evaluated the standard model higgs reaction first using form @xcite to reduce to scalar loop integrals according to the methods in ref @xcite .
then we did the scalar loop integrals by standard techniques .
eventually we also used feynarts as an extra check as one should take disagreement with two papers not lightly .
we would also have used the grace @xcite system as a check , but unfortunately the version we had was nt ready for it yet and for the version that might have handled it we did nt have the proper supporting programs .
because in the old calculations the amplitude reached a maximum at 90 degrees and the new calculation gives zero there , it should come as no surprise that the total crosssection is now significantly smaller .
we give some numbers : in the table we show a number of crosssections for different energies and masses .
this can be used as a reference to test programs . for the coupling constants we used the running values .
this is not automatic in the feynarts system . in figure 4
we show the crosssections as a function of the cm energy for a 120 gev higgs mass .
we see a slowly declining crosssection when we are away from the threshold .
this must clearly be a loop effect , as the tree graphs would show a slow ( logarithmic ) rise . in figure 5
we see the differential distribution in terms of the cos of the cm azimuthal angle . as mentioned before
, this distribution should be zero at 90 degrees when @xmath30 .
the immediate consequence of this is that if the energy is much above threshold , one should look for these events in a different region of phase space than the one that the previous papers would indicate .
we have also redone some of the mssm calculations of ref @xcite . for this
we used solely the feynarts system @xcite . in this case
the situation is potentially more complicated , but the diagrams with even numbers of gamma matrices between the spinors are much smaller again and hence the same sign problem makes that the crosssections becomes correspondingly smaller than in the original calculation .
this means that the ratio between the signals from the standard model and the mssm model does nt change significantly .
the first author acknowledges financial support from the comunidad de madrid through a fpi contract and the helpful advice of t. hahn regarding the feynarts system .
the work of second author was supported by fom and the humboldt foundation .
we would like to thank desy zeuthen for its hospitality during part of this work .
gaemers and f. hoogeveen , z. phys .
c26 ( 1984 ) 249 a.djouadi , v. driesen and c. junger ; phys.rev d54 ( 1996 ) 759 .
t. hahn , comput .
140 ( 2001 ) 418 j.a.m .
vermaseren , math - ph/0010025 g.j .
van oldenborgh and j.a.m .
vermaseren , z. phys .
c46 ( 1990 ) 425 g. belanger et al .
, phys.rept .
430 ( 2006 ) 117 - 209 t. hahn and c. schappacher , comput .
commun . 143
( 2002 ) 54 | reaction @xmath0 interesting from theoretical viewpoint coupling higgs to electrons proportional to electron mass tree graphs small one loop contribution gives dominant part of crosssection recognized in past @xcite found crosssections small only for special higgs particles in susy models crosssection larger due to bigger tree graph contribution finish subject during project testing methods recalculated reaction found both papers shortcomings correction altered final numbers mean reaction important at future ilc but reports about reactions can quote correct numbers if extra higgs particles errors past can avoided future major problem with one loop calculations involve much work use symmetry arguments to minimize number of diagrams traditionally safe symmetry is bose or fermi statistics when identical particles involved two higgs particles involved previous papers used symmetry got relative sign of diagrams wrong used indirect argument for identical particles amplitude maximal at region of overlap scattering at 90 degrees region overlap adjusted relative sign show next not the case at 90 degrees amplitude is zero diminishes crosssection verified result with feynarts @xcite system agrees with our findings letter arrangedstart explaining relative sign graphs in formulas using tree graphs example show diagrams compute sign tree graphs transfers to loop graphs calculation done many ways automatically with systems feynarts go unnecessary details present new numbers show distributions lowest order reaction @xmath0 has three diagrams label t - channel u - channel s - channel graphs310,60) 20,50)(50,50)1.5 ( 13,50)@xmath4 ( 13,10)@xmath5 ( 89,50)@xmath6 ( 89,10)@xmath7 ( 45,30)@xmath8 ( 100,30)@xmath9 ( 120,50)(150,50 ) 150,10)3 ( 150,10)1.5 ( 113,50)@xmath4 ( 113,10)@xmath5 ( 189,50) ( 189,10) ( 145,30)@xmath10 ( 200,30)@xmath9 ( 220,50)(240,30 ) 240,30)(270,30)3 270,30)(290,10)3,30)1.5 ( 270,30)1.5 ( 213,50)@xmath4 ( 213,10) ( 299,50) ( 299,10) ( 255,25)@xmath11 1 three tree graphs reaction @xmath12 small coupling higgs electron suppressed by powers @xmath13 less than @xmath14 t - channel u - channel graphs have two powers s - channel graph one coupling fixed constant c electron massamplitude t - channel graph becomes @xmath15 dirac equation electron mass zero gives @xmath16 u - channel diagram exchange @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath10 gives @xmath17 replaced @xmath7 by @xmath18 @xmath4 @xmath5 removed dirac equation change sign caused problems sum t - u - channel graphs proportional to @xmath19 : @xmath20 at 90 degrees amplitude vanishes complete matrix element invariant under exchange @xmath8 @xmath10 @xmath21 @xmath22 invariant @xmath8 @xmath10 dependence written variables contribution to full matrix @xmath23 leave s - channel graph equivalent one loop graphs not important vanish limit electron mass zero one loop level280,60)(0,0 20,50)(50,50 ))34.5 ( 90,50)(90,10)34.5 90,50)3)1.5 ( 50,10)1.5 90,50 13,50)@xmath4 ( 13,10)@xmath5 ( 129,50)@xmath6 ( 129,10)@xmath7 ( 70,45)@xmath24 ( 85,30) 70,15) 160,50)(190,50 ) 190,50)(190,50)34.5 ( 230,50)(230,10)3,50)(260,50)3 190,50)1.5 ( 190,10)1.5 230,50)1.5 230,10)1.5 ( 153,50)@xmath4 ( 153,10)@xmath5 ( 269,50)@xmath6 ( 269,10)@xmath7 ( 210,45)@xmath24 ( 227,30)@xmath25 ( 210,15)@xmath24 . 2 loop graphs reaction @xmath12 two types diagrams vector bosons ghosts vector bosons easier one power loop momentum numerator dirac equation loop momentum lorenz tensors box diagrams nonzero electron mass becomes zeroif terms in diagram have odd number gamma matrices ( @xmath26 counts as even diagram becomes type @xmath27 exchanging @xmath28 and @xmath29 same minus sign as before different for even number gamma matrices relative plus sign in standard model only diagrams with odd number gamma matrices when electron mass equal to zero problem with reference @xcite figures show strange unphysical behaviour when higgs mass varied to exchange of two indices in tensor in equation 8 once corrected more physical behaviour same result not enough details to investigate understand statement in reference @xcite agree with previous paper only problem with relative sign of diagrams calculation standard evaluated standard model higgs reaction using form @xcite to scalar loop integrals methods scalar loop integrals by standard techniques used feynarts as extra check disagreement with two papers would have used grace @xcite system as check version nt ready for proper supporting programs old calculations amplitude maximum at 90 degrees new calculation gives zero total crosssection now smaller table crosssections for different energies and masses reference to test programs for coupling constants used running values not automatic in feynarts systemfigure 4 crosssections function cm energy 120 gev higgs mass declining crosssection away from threshold loop effect tree graphs show slow rise figure 5 differential distribution cos cm azimuthal angle distribution zero at 90 degrees @xmath30 if energy above threshold events different region phase space redone mssm calculations @xcite used feynarts system @xcite complicated diagrams with even gamma matrices smaller crosssections smaller ratio between signals standard model mssm model change first author acknowledges financial support comunidad de madrid fpi contract advice t. hahn feynarts system second author supported by fom humboldt foundation desy zeuthen hospitality gaemers f. hoogeveen z. phys . c26 ( 1984 ) 249 a.djouadi v. driesen c. junger ; phys.rev d54 ( 1996 ) 759 t. hahn , comput . 140 ( 2001 ) 418 j.a.m . vermaseren math - ph/0010025 g van oldenborgh j.a.m . vermaseren z. phys . c46 ( 1990 ) 425 g. belanger et al . phys.rept 430 2006 ) 117 - 209 hahn 143 2002 ) 54 | 0.489682 | 2,876 | 1,496 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,657 | the article presents the results of experiments in computation of statistical values related to young diagrams , including the estimates on maximum and average ( by plancherel distribution ) dimension of irreducible representation of symmetric group @xmath0 .
the computed limit shapes of two - dimensional and three - dimensional diagrams distributed by richardson statistics are presented as well . | a classical definition of young diagram@xcite is the following : the young diagram if size @xmath1 is a finite descending ideal in the lattice @xmath2 , i.e. a set of cells in positive quadrant , which contains a cell @xmath3 only if it contains as well all the sells under @xmath3 in terms of particular order . standard young table of size @xmath1 is a young diagram whose
cells are filled with numbers in the range from @xmath4 to @xmath1 , which increase in each row and each column . in other words ,
young table is a path in a lattice of young diagrams , which starts at the empty ( zero - sized ) diagram and ends in the given diagram .
young diagrams correspond to irreducible representations of @xmath0 ( see for example @xcite ) , and the number of young tables that fit into a given young diagram is equal to the dimension of the corresponding irreducible representation . for the sake of brevity
we call this number the dimension of the diagram @xmath5 and denote it as @xmath6 .
this paper is organized as follows : in section 2 we will present the results of numerical experiments on asymptotics of a typical ( by plancherel measure ) dimension of irreducible representation of the symmetric group .
this measure was introduced in @xcite , for further details see @xcite .
section 3 is devoted to the similar computations of a maximum dimension of irreducible representation of the symmetric group .
the results of section 2 should be considered as a support of a conjecture @xcite about the existence of a limit value of normalized dimension of a typical @xmath5 by plancherel measure .
this hypothetical limit value is denoted as @xmath7 and called in @xcite `` specific entropy of an irreducible representation '' . at the same time , basing on out computations in section 3 , nothing conclusive can be said about the asymptotic behavior of the maximum dimension .
that is , there is no claim that @xmath8 comes to plateau on approachable values of @xmath1 . in section 4 , we are concerned with another distribution on young diagrams : richardson distribution , which was studied in @xcite .
we give an experimental evidence of the proved theorem about a limit shape of typical young diagrams .
then we make the similar experiments in three dimensions ( this time the dimension has nothing to do with @xmath0 ) , and form a hypothesis on a 3-dimensional limit shape .
let @xmath9 be the collection of equivalence classes of complex irreducible representations of @xmath0 . for @xmath10 ,
we denote by @xmath11 the dimension of the representation @xmath12 , and by @xmath13 we denote the plancherel measure @xcite .
this is actually a probabilistic measure on @xmath9 , which we can derive from burnside s conjecture : @xmath14 the set @xmath9 and the dimension @xmath11 have the following interpretation @xcite : @xmath9 is the ensemble of all young diagrams of size @xmath1 , and @xmath11 is the number of standard young tables that fit into the diagram @xmath12 . in the present article , we make no difference between @xmath12 and the corresponding irreducible representation .
vershik and kerov @xcite stated the following conjecture : there exists a limit @xmath21 almost everywhere ( by plancherel measure ) on the set of infinite young tables .
infinite young table is an infinite sequence of nested young diagrams of sizes increasing one - by - one : @xmath22 .
the hypothetical limit value is denoted as @xmath7 and called `` specific entropy of an irreducible representation '' .
we are studying the behavior of coefficient @xmath17 w.r.t .
some experiments in this area were undertaken in @xcite , where the expectation and variance of @xmath17 are given for five values of @xmath1 , 1600 maximum ( for @xmath23 the sample was only 14 diagrams ) .
we have done the same computations on modern hardware , which is far more powerful than 25 years ago
. * note . *
after we did the described experiments , it was reported of a new paper by alexander bufetov , which gives a proof of existence of a limit @xmath24 of @xmath17 in @xmath25 by plancherel measure : @xmath26 the actual value of @xmath24 is not likely to be obtainable by methods used in bufetov s proof . in should be also noted that the conjecture @xcite about the existence of a limit if @xmath17 almost everywhere is still open , and if it happens that such a limit value @xmath7 exists , then clearly @xmath27 .
hook formula ( see for example @xcite ) allows to compute @xmath28 , avoiding the enumeration of all young tables that fit into @xmath5 .
@xmath29 where @xmath3 is a cell of young diagram , and @xmath30 is the length of the hook associated to that cell .
the hook of the cell @xmath3 consists of the cell itself and all cells that are in @xmath31-th row to the right from @xmath3 or in @xmath32-th column above @xmath3 ( fig .
[ hooks ] )
. the definition of random young diagram by richardson measure can be easily generalized to three - dimensional case .
there are no known results about the limit shape in this case , but the figure [ richardson - shape-3d ] , obtained by our computations , leads to assumption that the limit shape complies to similar equation @xmath33 .
this result shows that the limit shape of 3-dimensional young diagrams generated by richardson process are probably different from the limit shape for uniformly - distributed diagrams , which was studied in @xcite , and finally found in @xcite . | classical definition of young diagram@xcite size @xmath1 is finite descending ideal in lattice @xmath2 set cells in positive quadrant contains cell @xmath3 if sells under @xmath3 standard young table of size @xmath1 is cells filled with numbers from @xmath4 to @xmath1 increase each row column young table path in lattice of young diagrams starts at empty diagram ends in given diagram young diagrams correspond to irreducible representations of @xmath0 number of young tables equal to dimension corresponding irreducible representation call number dimension of diagram @xmath5 @xmath6 paper organized section 2 results of numerical experiments on asymptotics of typical plancherel dimension of irreducible representation symmetric group measure introduced in @xcite section 3 similar computations maximum dimension irreducible representation results 2 conjecture about limit value of normalized dimension of typical @xmath5 measure hypothetical limit value denoted as @xmath7 specific entropy of irreducible representation '' nothing conclusive about asymptotic behavior of maximum dimension no claim that @xmath8 plateau on approachable values of @xmath1section 4 concerned distribution young diagrams richardson distribution studied in @xcite experimental evidence theorem limit shape typical young diagrams similar experiments three dimensions @xmath0 form hypothesis 3-dimensional limit shape @xmath9 collection equivalence classes complex irreducible representations @xmath0 @xmath10 denote @xmath11 dimension representation @xmath12 @xmath13 plancherel measure @xcite probabilistic measure on @xmath9 from burnside s conjecture @xmath14 set @xmath9 dimension @xmath11 interpretation @xmath9 ensemble young diagrams size @xmath1 @xmath11 number standard young tables diagram @xmath12 article no difference between @xmath12 irreducible representation vershik kerov conjecture limit @xmath21 on infinite young tables infinite young table infinite sequence nested young diagrams sizes increasing hypothetical limit value denoted @xmath7 specific entropy of irreducible representation studying behavior coefficient @xmath17 experiments in @xcite expectation variance of @xmath17 for five values of @xmath1 1600 maximum @xmath23 sample 14 diagrams same computations on modern hardware more powerful than 25 years agoafter experiments new paper by bufetov limit @xmath24 of @xmath17 in @xmath25 by plancherel measure value of @xmath24 not obtainable by methods bufetov s proof conjecture about limit if @xmath17 open if limit value @xmath7 exists @xmath27 hook formula allows compute @xmath28 avoiding enumeration young tables @xmath5 @xmath29 @xmath3 is cell of young diagram @xmath30 is length of hook hook of cell @xmath3 consists of cell cells in @xmath31-th row right from @xmath3 or @xmath32-th column above @xmath3 definition of random young diagram by richardson measure generalized to three - dimensional case no known results about limit shape limit shape complies to equation @xmath33 shows limit shape of 3-dimensional young diagrams by richardson process different from for uniformly - distributed diagrams studied in @xcite found in | 0.18742 | 1,292 | 661 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,660 | transverse - field @xmath0sr shifts and relaxation rates have been measured in the non - fermi liquid ( nfl ) alloy system ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath3 , 1.5 , and 2.5 . at low temperatures the fractional spread in knight shifts
@xmath4 is @xmath5 for @xmath6 , but is only half this value for @xmath7 and 2.5 . in a disorder - driven scenario where the nfl behavior is due to a
broadly distributed ( kondo or griffiths - phase cluster ) characteristic energy @xmath8 , our results indicate that @xmath9 is similar for ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 ( @xmath6 and 1.5 ) and ucu@xmath10pt , but is reduced for ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath7 and 2.5 .
this reduction is due to a marked increase of @xmath8 with increasing @xmath11 ; the spread @xmath12 is found to be roughly independent of @xmath11 .
our results correlate with the observed suppression of other nfl anomalies for @xmath13 in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 but not in ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 , and are further evidence for the importance of disorder in the nfl behavior of both these alloy systems .
non - fermi liquid , @xmath0sr , susceptibility inhomogeneity , ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 | ucu@xmath14 is a heavy - fermion antiferromagnet ( nel temperature @xmath15 k ) @xcite . in the alloy systems
ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 and ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 @xmath16 is suppressed to 0 in the neighborhood of @xmath6 , beyond which point non - fermi liquid ( nfl ) behavior is observed in both systems . for ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 nfl signatures
are strong only for @xmath17 @xcite , whereas for ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 nfl behavior is significant over a range of concentrations ( @xmath18 ) .
this raises the possibility that nfl behavior is strong only in ucu@xmath10pt because in this alloy series , unlike ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 , the concentration @xmath17 is a quantum critical point @xcite . in these alloys
the transverse - field @xmath0sr ( tf-@xmath0sr ) relaxation rate ( i.e. , the width of the @xmath0sr line ) is due to an inhomogeneous spread @xmath19 of muon knight shifts @xmath20 @xcite .
this spread is in turn a measure of the spread @xmath21 in magnetic susceptibility @xmath22 from the basic relation @xmath23 .
the relaxation rate becomes very large at low temperatures in a number of nfl materials including ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 and ucu@xmath10pt @xcite .
early nmr observations of this effect in ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 @xcite were taken as evidence for the `` kondo disorder '' model @xcite for disorder - driven nfl behavior .
this motivated a similar tf-@xmath0sr study of the ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 alloy system .
the @xmath0sr experiments reported here were carried out using the general purpose spectrometer at the paul scherrer institute , villigen , switzerland .
measured tf-@xmath0sr rates in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath3 , 1.5 , and 2.5 , and ucu@xmath10pd are shown in fig .
1 . pt@xmath2 , @xmath3 , 1.5 , and 2.5 , and ucu@xmath10pd.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] the increase of exponential relaxation rate with decreasing temperature in ucu@xmath10pt is found to be about 40% less than that in ucu@xmath10pd after correction for the difference in measuring fields ( the relaxation rate , which is due to the inhomogeneous magnetization , is proportional to field ) .
the increase is weaker still for ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath7 and 2.5 , where the rates are practically independent of @xmath11 .
a heuristic model @xcite is useful in understanding this low - temperature increase .
assume a curie - weiss form @xmath24 where @xmath8 is a characteristic energy ( here @xmath25 ) that is inhomogeneously distributed .
then crudely ( to first order ) a spread @xmath12 in @xmath8 yields a spread @xmath26 in @xmath22 , where @xmath27 is the spatially - averaged susceptibility .
so we expect @xmath28 if disorder in the characteristic energy produces an inhomogeneous distribution of the susceptibility .
a plot of the fractional spread in muon knight shift @xmath29 vs. @xmath27 , with temperature an implicit parameter , is a useful presentation of these results . here
@xmath30 is an effective coupling constant that describes the interaction between @xmath31-ion spins and muons taking into account the spatial correlation of the disorder @xcite .
then @xmath29 is essentially the fractional spread @xmath32 in the inhomogeneous susceptibility . according to eq .
( [ eq : bernal ] ) @xmath29 should be roughly proportional to @xmath27 , with slope @xmath33 . the results for ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath3 , 1.5 , and 2.5 , and ucu@xmath10pd , shown in fig . 2 ,
exhibit this behavior ( the small feature for @xmath34 is mainly due to a low - temperature anomaly in @xmath22 , probably caused by paramagnetic impurities ) . vs. spatially - averaged ( bulk ) susceptibility @xmath27 , with temperature
an implicit parameter , in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath3 , 1.5 , and 2.5 , and ucu@xmath10pd.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] here @xmath35 has been calculated assuming dipolar coupling , as is the case in ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 to a good approximation @xcite .
experimentally @xmath29 is not quite proportional to @xmath22 , which is natural given the crude linear approximation of eq .
( [ eq : bernal ] ) . the departure from proportionality at small @xmath22 ( high temperatures )
may be due to thermally - activated muon diffusion , which motionally narrows the line and reduces @xmath19 , but this mechanism is activated and can not account for the gradual and roughly proportional increase of @xmath29 with increasing @xmath27 at lower temperatures .
this behavior , which as outlined above provides evidence for a broad distribution of characteristic energies , is observed for all samples .
we observe large values of @xmath29 ( @xmath362 ) at low temperatures in both ucu@xmath10pt and ucu@xmath10pd .
since @xmath37 , where @xmath38 is the spatially - averaged characteristic energy , we have @xmath39 from eqs .
( [ eq : curie])([eq : bernal ] ) .
thus we find a broad distribution of @xmath8 ( @xmath40 ) in the `` inhomogeneous characteristic energy '' scenario described above .
such a broad distribution is essential for nfl behavior in the disorder - driven kondo disorder @xcite and griffiths - phase @xcite models , since in these pictures nfl properties are due to uncompensated spins with @xmath41 @xcite . in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath7 and 2.5 , the values of @xmath29 as @xmath42 ( i.e. , the data for highest susceptibilites in fig . 2 )
are smaller than for @xmath3 .
this result agrees with thermodynamic and transport measurements @xcite , which show a return to fermi - liquid behavior for these concentrations .
in contrast , in ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 @xmath29 at low temperatures is similar for @xmath3 and 1.5 @xcite .
the slope @xmath33 is roughly independent of @xmath11 in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , and a factor of two larger than the slope in ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 .
why is @xmath33 larger in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , @xmath7 and 2.5 , if nfl effects are smaller in these alloys ?
the zero - temperature susceptibility @xmath43 is a factor of two smaller in ucu@xmath10pt than in ucu@xmath10pd , so that the characteristic energy is a factor of two larger in ucu@xmath10pt .
the values of @xmath44 are comparable ( fig .
2 ) , so that we obtain a larger @xmath12 and a larger slope @xmath33 for ucu@xmath10pt than for ucu@xmath10pd . for @xmath45 and 2.5
@xmath43 is smaller still , so that even with the larger slope @xmath44 remains relatively small .
in ucu@xmath10pd we find @xmath46 k from the slope in fig .
this together with eq .
( [ eq : lowtemp ] ) gives @xmath47 k , in good agreement with the paramagnetic curie - weiss temperature = 133 k from @xmath48 @xcite . in ucu@xmath10pt a similar analysis yields @xmath49 k and @xmath50 k , in agreement with the paramagnetic curie - weiss temperature = 200 - 300 k from @xmath48 for @xmath512.5 .
the increase of @xmath38 with increasing @xmath11 is consistent with the observed decrease of the bulk susceptibility at low temperatures @xcite . in disorder - driven nfl theories
the important parameter is @xmath44 .
our results show that the increase of @xmath38 in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 , both in comparison with ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 and as @xmath52 is increased , produces a decrease in @xmath44 , and hence of nfl behavior , for ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 .
the data are consistent with ascribing the nfl behavior of both alloy systems to disorder effects , rather than to the proximity of a quantum critical point in one alloy system but not in the other .
we are grateful to a. amato , c. baines , and d. herlach for their help during the experiments .
one of us ( d.e.m . ) wishes to thank k. ishida , y. maeno , and the quantum materials group at kyoto university , and also k. nagamine and the msl group at kek , for their hospitality during visits when part of this work was carried out .
these experiments were performed at the swiss muon source , paul scherrer institute , villigen , switzerland .
the work was supported by us nsf grants dmr-0102293 ( riverside ) , dmr-0335173 ( san diego ) , and dmr-0203524 ( los angeles ) , by the u.s .
doe , contract fg02 - 04er46105 ( san diego ) , and by the netherlands nwo and fom ( leiden ) .
work at los alamos was carried out under the auspices of the us doe .
o. o. bernal , d. e. maclaughlin , a. amato , r. feyerherm , f. n. gygax , a. schenck , r. h. heffner , l. p. le , g. j. nieuwenhuys , b. andraka , h. v. lhneysen , o. stockert , h. r. ott , phys .
b 54 ( 1996 ) 130008 .
we have not attempted a detailed fit of either of these models to the data , in view of the difficulties both models have in explaining the low - frequency thermal fluctuation spectrum responsible for longitudinal - field muon spin relaxation @xcite . | ucu@xmath14 heavy - fermion antiferromagnet temperature k @xcite alloy systems@xmath1pd @xmath16 suppressed to 0 @xmath6 non - fermi liquid nfl behavior observed ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 nfl signatures strong @xmath17 @xcite@xmath1pd@xmath2 nfl significant over concentrations @xmath18 nfl behavior strong in ucu@xmath10pt concentration @xmath17 quantum critical point @xcite transverse - field @xmath0sr relaxation rate due to inhomogeneous spread of muon knight shifts @xmath20 @xcite spread measure magnetic susceptibility relaxation rate large at low temperatures in nfl materials ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2@xmath10pt @xcite early observations in ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 @xcite evidence kondo disorder '' model disorder - driven nfl behavior motivated similar tf-@xmath0sr study ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 alloy system experiments general purpose spectrometer paul scherrer institute villigen switzerlandtf-@xmath0sr rates in ucu@xmath1pt 1.5 2.5@xmath10pd shown in fig . 1=45.0% increase exponential relaxation rate with decreasing temperature in ucu@xmath10pt 40% less@xmath10pd after correction difference fields inhomogeneous magnetization proportional to field increase weaker for ucu@xmath1pt 2.5 rates independent of @xmath11 heuristic model @xcite low - temperature increase curie - weiss form @xmath24 @xmath8 characteristic energy inhomogeneously distributed spread @xmath12 in @xmath8 yields spread @xmath26 in @xmath22 @xmath27 spatially - averaged susceptibility expect @xmath28 if disorder energy inhomogeneous distribution susceptibility plot of spread in muon knight shift @xmath29 vs. @xmath27 temperature implicit parameter @xmath30 coupling constant interaction between @xmath31-ion spins muons spatial correlation disorder @xmath29 fractional spread @xmath32 in inhomogeneous susceptibility eq eq : bernal @xmath29 proportional to @xmath27 slope @xmath33 results for ucu@xmath1pt @xmath3 1.5 2.5@xmath10pd fig . 2 exhibit this behavior small feature for @xmath34 due to low - temperature anomaly in @xmath22 paramagnetic impurities spatially - averaged susceptibility @xmath27 temperature implicit parameter in,scaledwidth=45.0% @xmath35 calculated assuming dipolar coupling @xmath29 not proportional to @xmath22 natural linear approximation eq bernal departure from proportionality at @xmath22 high temperatures due to thermally - activated muon diffusion narrows line reduces @xmath19 not account for increase of @xmath29 @xmath27 at lower temperatures behavior broad distribution characteristic energies observed for all samples large values of @xmath29 @xmath362 ) at low temperatures in ucu@xmath10pt@xmath10pd @xmath37 @xmath38 spatially - averaged characteristic energy @xmath39 from eqs curie bernalbroad distribution of @xmath8 ) in inhomogeneous characteristic energy scenario essential for nfl behavior in disorder - driven kondo disorder @xcite griffiths - phase models nfl properties due to uncompensated spins with @xmath41 in ucu@xmath1pt@xmath2 @xmath7 2.5 values @xmath29 @xmath42 smaller than @xmath3 agrees with thermodynamic transport measurements return to fermi - liquid behavior ucu@xmath1pd@xmath2 @xmath29 at low temperatures similar for @xmath3 1.5 @xcite slope @xmath33 independent of @xmath11 factor two larger than slope @xmath33 larger in 2.5 nfl effects zero - temperature susceptibility @xmath43 two smaller in ucu@xmath10pt characteristic energy larger in values @xmath44 comparable larger @xmath12 larger slope @xmath33 for ucu@xmath10pt than@xmath10pd @xmath45 and 2.5 @xmath43 smaller @xmath44 remains small in ucu@xmath10pd @xmath46 k from slope in fig eq lowtemp gives @xmath47 k paramagnetic curie - weiss temperature = 133 k from @xmath48 @xcite ucu@xmath10pt analysis yields @xmath49 k @xmath50 k - weiss temperature 200 - 300 k from @xmath48 for @xmath512.5 increase @xmath38 @xmath11 consistent with decrease bulk susceptibility at low temperatures @xcite disorder - driven nfl theories important parameter is @xmath44 results show increase @xmath38 in@xmath1pt@xmath2 produces decrease @xmath44 nfl behavior@xmath1pt@xmath2 data consistent ascribing nfl behavior alloy systems to disorder effects proximity quantum critical point grateful to a. amato c. baines d. herlach help k. ishida y. maeno quantum materials group kyoto university k. nagamine msl group at kek for hospitality experiments performed at swiss muon source paul scherrer institute villigen switzerland supported by nsf grants-0102293 u.s .doe contract fg02 - 04er46105 san diego netherlands nwo fom leiden ) work los alamos auspices us doe bernal maclaughlin. amato feyerherm. gygax schenck heffner p. le. nieuwenhuys andraka v. lhneysen stockert. ott . b 54 ( 1996 ) 130008 not attempted detailed fit models data difficulties explaining low - frequency thermal fluctuation spectrum longitudinal - field muon spin relaxation | 0.347919 | 2,477 | 1,265 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.