sample_number int64 8 203k | abstract stringlengths 21 17.4k | article stringlengths 0 18.9k | compressed_article stringlengths 0 10.9k | compression_time float64 0 0.78 | original_tokens int64 0 3.79k | compressed_tokens int64 0 2.29k | token_saving stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
195,669 | the spin-1 quantum ising systems with three - spin interactions on two - dimensional triangular lattices are studied by mean - field method .
the thermal variations of order parameters and phase diagrams are investigated in detail .
the stable , metastable and unstable branches of the order parameters are obtained . according to the stable conditions at critical point , we find that the systems exhibit tricritical points . with crystal field and biquadratic interactions ,
the system has rich phase diagrams with single reentrant or double reentrant phase transitions for appropriate ranges of the both parameters . | the models with multispin interactions have attracted much attentions , such as the eight - vertex model @xcite which involves both two- and four - spin interactions , the ising model with four - spin interactions @xcite and the baxter - wu model @xcite which is a non - trivial ising model with three - spin interactions on a triangular lattice .
the hamiltonian of the baxter - wu model is@xmath0where @xmath1 denotes a triplet of nearest neighbor sites of a triangular lattice , @xmath2 is the coupling constant , and @xmath3 _ _ _ _ is the ising spin located at site @xmath4 . besides the two - dimensional ising model @xcite , the baxter - wu model is another exactly solvable one which exhibits spontaneous symmetry breaking .
the system has been studied by series - expansion analysis griffiths73,watts74,adler , monte carlo @xcite , monte carlo renormalization group @xcite and conformal invariance approaches @xcite , etc .
it has the same critical temperature as the ising model with three - spin interactions in one direction on a square lattice @xcite , and belongs to the same universality class as two - dimensional 4-state potts system with the equal critical exponents @xcite , namely , their specific heat critical exponent and the correlation length exponent are equal to 2/3 @xmath5 , and correlation function exponent is @xmath6 .
in addition , costa _
et al_. @xcite have studied the spin-1 baxter - wu model with a crystal field and found that the phase diagram presents a tricritical point . in 1990s ,
due to describing incommensurate phases of quantum one - dimensional magnetics , tsvelik constructed a modified xxz model @xcite with hamiltonian@xmath7where @xmath8 are pauli matrices , @xmath9 is the total number of spins , @xmath10 is the three - spin interactions strength . with competing of the two and three - spin interactions , the model exhibits several quantum phase frahm1992,lou2004 . in this paper , imitating eq .
( [ mxxz ] ) we define a quantum ising model with three - spin interactions on a triangular lattice .
it is well - known that the blume - capel ( bc ) model @xcite and the blume - emery - griffiths ( beg ) model @xcite present much interesting critical phenomenon : tricritical point , multicritical phase diagrams @xcite , the reentrant phenomenon @xcite , metastable and unstable states lapinskas , ekiz .
similar to the bc model and beg model , we study the spin-1 quantum ising systems with a crystal field and biquadratic interactions by mean - field method .
our emphases are the thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of the systems .
we expect our system can exhibit that interesting proprieties .
the outline of this paper is as follows . in section [ model ] , using the mean - field method , we study the spin-1 quantum ising system with a crystal field . in sec .
[ beg ] , the spin-1 quantum ising system with biquadratic interactions is studied in detail , and sec .
[ summary ] is a brief summary .
the spin-1 quantum ising model with three - spin interactions in presence of a crystal field on a triangular lattice is defined by the hamiltonian @xmath11 where @xmath12 , @xmath13 @xmath14 are components of the spin-1 operator at site @xmath4 , and @xmath15 plays the role of a crystal field .
@xmath16 are @xmath17 in the following discussion , the coupling constant @xmath18 , that is , a ferromagnetic case is considered .
based on the mean - field approximation fittipaldi , sun , the three - spin cluster hamiltonian @xmath19 can be written as@xmath20 where @xmath21 is the average magnetization of the cluster , @xmath22 . in the representation of the direct product of @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 ,
@xmath19 can be written as a form of @xmath26 matrix .
thus the partition function @xmath27 tr@xmath28 $ ] ( @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the boltzmann constant , @xmath31 denotes the temperature of the system ) can be obtained as@xmath32 in which@xmath33@xmath34 \text{,}\ ] ] where @xmath35 is the reciprocal of the reduced temperature , and @xmath36 is the reduced crystal - field parameter .
the reduced free energy @xmath37 of the three - spin cluster in the system as a function of @xmath38 and @xmath21 is further given by@xmath39 \text{.}\ ] ] according to the equilibrium condition of the system @xmath40 , we can obtain the self - consistent equation of the magnetization@xmath41 where@xmath42 by solving the self - consistent eq .
( [ m1 ] ) , numerically , we obtain the thermal variations of the magnetization for several values of @xmath43 ( fig . 1 ) .
we obtain the stable , metastable and unstable branches , which are represented by the solid , dot and dash - dotted lines , respectively .
it can be seen that for @xmath44 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 the stable magnetization are continuous , indicating the second - order phase transitions . for @xmath47 and @xmath46
, we also find unstable solutions . on the other hand , the stable magnetization drops discontinuously from a finite value @xmath48 to zero at a temperature @xmath49 , which characterizes a first - order phase transition .
the first - order phase transition temperature @xmath50 can be obtained by the free energy , when its local minimum at @xmath51 is equal to the local minimum at @xmath52 @xcite . when the reduced crystal - field parameter is slightly larger than the tricritical point @xmath53
, the system can undergo the first - order phase transition , such as , for @xmath54 the first - order phase transition temperature is @xmath55 .
figure 2 shows the phase diagram of the spin-1 quantum ising system in the presence of a crystal field .
the critical line separates the ferromagnetic phase from the paramagnetic phase .
we can see that the second - order phase transition ( solid line ) occurs for finite values of the crystal field .
the second - order phase transition temperature falls smoothly with the reduced crystal - field parameter @xmath43 increasing and reaches the tricritical point .
the value of the tricritical point is _ _
_ _ @xmath56 _ _ _ _ and _ _ _ _ @xmath57 , _ _
_ _ which is different from that in ref [ 13 ] _
_ _ _ @xmath58 _ _ and _ _ _ _ @xmath59__. _ _ then , the first - order phase transition line falls smoothly from the tricritical point to zero .
this phenomenon is similar to the spin-1 baxter - wu model @xcite .
it need to clear that the last point of the curve in fig . 2 is _ _
_ _ @xmath60 _ _ _ _ and _ _ _ _ @xmath61__. _ _
the hamiltonian of the spin-1 quantum ising system with biquadratic interactions on a triangular lattice is defined as @xmath62 where @xmath63 indicates all nearest - neighbor pairs of sites of a triangular lattice and @xmath64 denotes the biquadratic interactions parameter .
different from that in sec .
[ model ] , for solving this model , we need two order parameters : the magnetization @xmath21 and quadrupolar moment @xmath65.@xmath66using the similar method as in sec . [ model ] , the three - spin cluster hamiltonian @xmath67has the following expression:@xmath68 where @xmath21 has been defined in sec . [ model ]
, @xmath65 is the average squared magnetization of the three - spin cluster , @xmath69 . according to the definition of _ _ _ _ the partition function , it is obtained as @xmath70 in which@xmath71@xmath72@xmath73@xmath74 where @xmath75 is the reduced biquadratic parameter .
the reduced free energy of the three - spin cluster can be written as@xmath76 with the equilibrium conditions ( @xmath77 and @xmath78 ) of the system , the self - consistent equations of the two order parameters are@xmath79 and@xmath80 in which@xmath81@xmath82 where@xmath83\text{.}\ ] ] by numerically calculating eqs .
( [ self - consistent - m ] ) and ( self - consistent - q ) , the behavior of the magnetization @xmath21 and quadrupolar moment @xmath65 as functions of temperature are obtained ( see figs . 3 and 4 ) .
we obtain the stable ( m1 and q1 ) , unstable ( m2 and q2 ) and metastable ( m3 and q3 ) branches . as in sec .
[ model ] , the stable branches of the order parameters undergo the first - order or second - order phase transition . what is interesting is that in figs .
3(d ) and 3(e ) , the stable branches of the order parameters undergo one first - order phase transition and one second - order phase - transition successively .
4(b ) shows that the stable branches of the order parameters undergo two second - order phase transitions and one first - order phase transition .
otherwise , what should be mentioned is that the stable branch of the quadrupole order parameter does not undergo any phase transition when the stable branch of the magnetization is equal to zero @xcite ( see fig .
seen from fig . 3 , at @xmath84 , the system can be in the ground state with @xmath85 , @xmath86 _ _ _ _ or @xmath87 , which is similar to the ground state of the @xmath88 ising model on triangular lattice @xcite .
the actual ground state depends on the competition between the reduced biquadratic interaction and crystal field .
figure 5 shows three phase diagrams for different biquadratic parameter @xmath89 .
it can be seen that the first - order phase transition can occur either in the range of @xmath90 ( fig .
5(a ) ) or @xmath91 ( fig .
at fixed reduced biquadratic and crystal - field parameter in fig .
5(a ) , when the temperature decrease the transition from paramagnetic phase ( p ) to ferromagnetic phase ( f ) is encountered , and if the temperature is lowered further , the reentrant phase transition from ferromagnetic phase to paramagnetic phase can take place .
5(c ) shows a double reentrant phenomena , that is , at fixed reduced biquadratic and crystal field parameter , as the temperature decrease , the p@xmath92f@xmath93p@xmath94f sequence of phase is encountered .
it may be determined by the competition among quantum effect , crystal - field and the biquadratic interaction .
in this paper , we have investigated the spin-1 quantum ising systems with three - spin interactions on two - dimensional triangular lattices by mean - field approximation .
the thermal variations of the magnetization @xmath21 and quadrupolar moment @xmath65 are obtained . by comparing the free energy of these solutions ,
we obtain the stable , unstable and metastable branches of the order parameters .
in addition , we find that the quantum ising systems present tricritical points for finite values of the crystal field , and the system with biquadratic interactions exhibits single reentrant and double reentrant phase transitions . this work was supported by the national natural science foundation of china under grant no .
10775088 , the shandong natural science foundation ( grant no .
y2006a05 ) , and the science foundation of qufu normal university .
1the magnetization @xmath21 versus temperature @xmath95 for the spin-1 quantum ising system with a crystal field on a triangular lattice .
curves a , b , c , d represent the stable branches for @xmath44 , @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath96 , respectively . curves b@xmath97 , c@xmath97 , d@xmath98 represent the unstable branches and curve d@xmath99 is the metastable branch .
2the phase diagram of spin-1 quantum ising system with a crystal field on a triangular lattice .
the solid line represents the second - order phase transition and dot line represents the first - order phase transition . the big real point ( solid dot )
is the tricritical point .
p and f represent the paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases , respectively .
3the magnetization @xmath21 and quadrupolar moment @xmath65 as functions of temperature @xmath100and crystal - field parameter @xmath43 with @xmath101 for the spin-1 quantum ising model with biquadratic interactions on a triangular lattice .
m1 , q1 ( solid line ) are the stable branches of the magnetization @xmath21 and quadrupolar moment @xmath65 , respectively ; m2 , q2 ( dot line ) represent the unstable branches ; m3 , q3 ( dash - dot line ) represent the metastable branches . @xmath102 and
@xmath103 indicate the first - order and second - order phase transition temperature , respectively .
4the nonzero order parameters @xmath21 and @xmath65 as functions of temperature @xmath100and crystal - field parameter @xmath43 with @xmath104 for the spin-1 quantum ising model with biquadratic interactions on a triangular lattice .
m1 , q1 ( solid line ) represent the stable branches ; m2 , q2 ( dot line ) represent the unstable branches . @xmath102 and
@xmath105 indicate the first - order and second - order phase transition temperatures , respectively .
@xmath106 is the unstable critical temperature .
5phase diagrams of the spin-1 quantum ising model with biquadratic interactions on a triangular lattice for different @xmath107 .
the solid and dot lines represent the second - order and first - order phase transition lines and the solid dot represents the tricritical point .
p and f denote the paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phase , respectively .
( a ) shows a p@xmath108f@xmath94p reentrant phase transitions .
( c ) shows a p@xmath108f@xmath94p@xmath94f double reentrant phase transitions . | models with multispin interactions attracted attentions eight - vertex model two four - spin ising model four - spin baxter - wu model three - spin interactions on triangular lattice hamiltonian of baxter - wu model is@xmath0where triplet nearest sites triangular lattice coupling constant ising spin site @xmath4 baxter - wu model spontaneous symmetry breaking system studied by series - expansion analysis monte carlo renormalization group conformal invariance approaches same critical temperature as ising model three - spin interactions square lattice same universality class as two - dimensional 4-state potts system equal critical exponents specific heat critical exponent correlation length exponent equal to 2/3 @xmath5 correlation function exponent @xmath6 costa et al studied spin-1 baxter - wu model phase diagram presents tricritical point 1990s tsvelik constructed modified xxz model @xcite with hamiltonian@xmath7where @xmath8 matrices @xmath9 total number of spins @xmath10 three - spin interactions strengthcompeting two three - spin interactions model exhibits quantum phase paper imitating define quantum ising model three - spin interactions triangular lattice blume - capel model blume - emery - griffiths model present critical phenomenon tricritical point multicritical phase diagrams reentrant phenomenon metastable unstable states similar study spin-1 quantum ising systems crystal field biquadratic interactions mean - field method emphases thermodynamic properties phase diagrams expect system exhibit proprieties outline paper section model mean - field method study spin-1 quantum ising system with crystal field spin-1 ising system biquadratic interactions studied detail summary brief summary spin-1 quantum ising model three - spin interactions crystal field triangular lattice defined by hamiltonian @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 components spin-1 operator @xmath15 crystal field @xmath16 @xmath17 coupling constant @xmath18 ferromagnetic case considered mean - field approximation three - spin cluster hamiltonian @xmath19 written as@xmath20 @xmath21 average magnetization cluster @xmath22representation product of @xmath23 @xmath19 written @xmath26 matrix partition function @xmath27@xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 boltzmann constant temperature system obtained as@xmath32@xmath33@xmath34 @xmath35 reciprocal reduced temperature reduced crystal - field parameter reduced free energy @xmath37 three - spin cluster function of @xmath38 @xmath21 given by@xmath39 equilibrium condition @xmath40 self - consistent equation of magnetization@xmath41@xmath42 solving self - consistent eq thermal variations of magnetization for values @xmath43 fig stable metastable unstable branches represented by solid dot dash - dotted lines @xmath44 @xmath46 stable magnetization continuous second - order phase transitions @xmath47 unstable solutions stable magnetization drops discontinuously from value @xmath48 to zero at temperature @xmath49 first - order phase transition first - order phase transition temperature @xmath50 obtained by free energy local minimum at @xmath51 equal to local minimum at @xmath52reduced crystal - field parameter larger than tricritical point @xmath53 system first - order phase transition temperature @xmath55 figure 2 shows phase diagram spin-1 quantum ising system crystal field critical line separates ferromagnetic phase from paramagnetic phase second - order phase transition occurs for finite values crystal field temperature falls smoothly reduced crystal - field parameter @xmath43 increasing reaches tricritical point value tricritical point @xmath56 @xmath57 different from 13 @xmath58 @xmath59__ first - order phase transition line falls from tricritical point to zero similar to spin-1 baxter - wu model last point of curve in fig 2 is @xmath60 @xmath61__ hamiltonian of spin-1 quantum ising system with biquadratic interactions on triangular lattice defined as @xmath62 @xmath63 indicates nearest - neighbor pairs sites triangular lattice @xmath64 biquadratic interactions parameter need two order parameters magnetization @xmath21 and quadrupolar moment @xmath65. three - spin cluster hamiltonian @xmath67has@xmath68 @xmath21 defined in sec@xmath65 average squared magnetization three - spin cluster @xmath69 partition function obtained as @xmath70@xmath71 @xmath75 reduced biquadratic parameter reduced free energy - spin cluster written as@xmath76 equilibrium conditions @xmath77 @xmath78 self - consistent equations two order parameters@xmath79@xmath80@xmath81@xmath82@xmath83 calculating eqs self - consistent - m - q ) behavior magnetization @xmath21 quadrupolar moment @xmath65 functions temperature obtained figs . 3 4 ) stable ( m1 q1 unstable m2 q2 metastable ( m3 q3 ) branches stable branches undergo first second - order phase transition figs . 3(d ) 3(e ) stable branches undergo one first - one second - order phase transition 4(b ) stable branches undergo two second - order phase transitions one first - order phase transition stable branch quadrupole order parameter phase transition when magnetization equal to zero @xcite figat @xmath84 system ground state with @xmath85 similar to state @xmath88 model triangular lattice ground state depends on competition between reduced biquadratic interaction crystal field figure 5 shows phase diagrams for @xmath89 first - order phase transition @xmath90 or @xmath91 reduced biquadratic crystal - field temperature transition from paramagnetic to ferromagnetic phase temperature lowered reentrant transition to double reentrant phenomena fixed reduced biquadratic crystal field parameter temperature@xmath92f@xmath93p@xmath94f sequence phase determined by competition among quantum effect crystal - field biquadratic interaction investigated spin-1 quantum ising systems with three - spin interactions on two - dimensional triangular lattices by mean - field approximation thermal variations of magnetization @xmath21 quadrupolar moment @xmath65 obtained comparing free energy stable unstable metastable branches order parameters quantum ising systems present tricritical points for finite values crystal field system with biquadratic interactions exhibits single double reentrant phase transitions supported by national natural science foundation china grant 10775088 shandong natural science foundationy2006a05 science foundation qufu university magnetization @xmath21 versus temperature @xmath95 spin-1 quantum ising system crystal field triangular lattice curves a b c d stable branches @xmath44 curves b c d unstable branches d metastable branch phase diagram spin-1 system triangular lattice solid line second - order phase dot line first - order phase transition big point solid dot tricritical point p f represent paramagnetic ferromagnetic phases magnetization @xmath21 quadrupolar moment @xmath65 functions temperature crystal - field parameter @xmath43 @xmath101 spin-1 quantum ising model interactions triangular lattice m1 q1 stable branches m2 q2 unstable branches m3 q3 metastable branches @xmath102 @xmath103 indicate first - order second - order phase transition temperature nonzero order parameters @xmath21 @xmath65 functions temperature crystal - field parameter @xmath43 @xmath104 spin-1 quantum ising model lattice m1 q1 stable branches m2 q2 unstable branches@xmath102 first second phase transition temperatures @xmath106 unstable critical temperature 5phase diagrams spin-1 quantum model biquadratic interactions triangular lattice @xmath107 solid dot lines represent second first phase transition lines solid dot tricritical point p f denote paramagnetic ferromagnetic phase a@xmath108f reentrant phase transitions c double reentrant phase transitions | 0.499072 | 3,254 | 1,631 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,673 | we present the analysis of a large sample of lines of sight with extinction curves covering wavelength range from near - infrared ( nir ) to ultraviolet ( uv ) .
we derive total to selective extinction ratios based on the cardelli , clayton & mathis ( 1989 , ccm ) law , which is typically used to fit the extinction data both for diffuse and dense interstellar medium .
we conclude that the ccm law is able to fit most of the extinction curves in our sample .
we divide the remaining lines of sight with peculiar extinction into two groups according to two main behaviors : a ) the optical / ir or / and uv wavelength region can not be reproduced by the ccm formula ; b ) the optical / nir and uv extinction data are best fit by the ccm law with different values of @xmath0 .
we present examples of such curves .
the study of both types of peculiar cases can help us to learn about the physical processes that affect dust in the interstellar medium , e.g. , formation of mantles on the surface of grains , evaporation , growing or shattering . | interstellar grains affect starlight which passes through them by absorbing and scattering photons .
these two physical processes produce the interstellar extinction which depends on the properties of dust grains , e.g. , size distribution and composition .
the description of the average extinction curve of our galaxy as a function of the wavelength from the infrared to ultraviolet can be found in savage @xcite .
extinction curve shows some evident features : it rises in the infrared , it shows a slight knee in the optical , it is characterized by a bump at 2175@xmath1 , and it rises in the far - ultraviolet .
these features are common between different environments .
the properties of interstellar grains are different in diffuse and dense interstellar medium and thus also the extinction changes .
ccm @xcite found an average extinction law valid over the wavelength range @xmath2 , which is applicable to both diffuse and dense regions of the interstellar medium .
this extinction law depends on only one parameter @xmath3 .
the @xmath0 parameter ranges from about 2.0 to about 5.5 ( with a typical value of 3.1 ) when one goes from diffuse to dense interstellar medium and thus @xmath0 characterizes the region that produces the extinction .
if one knows the value of @xmath0 along a particular line of sight , one can obtain the extinction curve from the infrared to ultraviolet using the ccm law ( see figure [ fig1 ] ) : @xmath4 where @xmath5 , and @xmath6 and @xmath7 are the wavelength - dependent coefficients
. there are different ways to obtain @xmath0 using the nir or uv extinction data .
wegner @xcite computed @xmath0 values for the sample of 597 ob stars with known near - infrared magnitudes .
he assumed that , in the infrared spectral region , the normalized extinction curve is proportional to @xmath8 or @xmath9 . extrapolating the ir interstellar extinction curve to @xmath10 he derived @xmath0 as : @xmath11 _ { \lambda \longrightarrow \infty } \label{rvwegner}\ ] ] gnaciski & sikorski @xcite applied the @xmath12 minimization method to compute the @xmath0 values for a sample of ultraviolet ( uv ) extinction data using the linear relation ( [ ccmlaw ] ) .
geminale & popowski @xcite extended the analysis from @xcite by using non - equal weights derived from observational errors to determine @xmath13 and @xmath0 values toward a sample of stars with known ultraviolet color excesses .
in this paper we use both optical / infrared ( @xmath14 ) and uv extinction data to obtain @xmath0 values for a sample of 436 lines of sight .
we arrive at two main conclusions : ( i ) there are lines of sight with extinction in the optical / ir or / and uv which generically do nt follow the ccm law , and ( ii ) there are lines of sight which show an extinction curve that can not be reproduced with a single @xmath0 value in the whole wavelength range .
we normalize the extinction in a standard way : @xmath15 the absolute extinction may be deduced from the relative extinction by using a total - to - selective extinction ratio @xmath0 : @xmath16 then : @xmath17 for each individual band , equation ( [ ccmlaw ] ) and ( [ eps ] ) can be combined to derive an @xmath0 value .
more generally , the @xmath12 minimization can be used to obtain the @xmath0 value that provides the best ccm fit to all observed extinction data .
gnaciski & sikorski @xcite suggested the following @xmath12 , which can be minimized to derive @xmath0 : @xmath18 \right \ } ^2,\ ] ] where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the coefficients of the ccm law .
following our previous work @xcite we use an improved weighted formula to find @xmath0 .
we minimize the following @xmath12 : @xmath21 \ } ^2 ~e^2(b - v ) \label{chiweighted}\ ] ] where @xmath22 are the weights associated with each band . minimizing equation ( [ chiweighted ] ) with respect to @xmath0 ,
we find : @xmath23 where here @xmath24 values are taken from wegner @xcite and they were computed according to : @xmath25 = \left [ \frac{1}{e(b - v ) } \right]^2 \ , \left \{\sigma^2[e(b - v ) ] + [ e(\lambda_i - v)]^2 \ , \sigma^2[e(\lambda_i - v ) ] \right \ } \label{sigma}\ ] ] we estimate the error in @xmath0 from : @xmath26
we use a sample of 436 lines of sight with optical / ir and uv extinction data reported by wegner @xcite . in wegner s
computation the ultraviolet photometry is taken from wesselius et al .
@xcite and based on _ astronomical netherlands satellite _ ( ans ) ; infrared magnitudes in @xmath27 passbands are originate mostly from the catalog of gezari , schmitz and mead @xcite and gezari et al . @xcite .
the @xmath28 and @xmath29 magnitudes with accuracy of @xmath30 mag are taken from johnson @xcite and fernie @xcite . the spectral classification and @xmath31 data
which have the accuracy of @xmath30 mag come from the simbad database .
the effective wavelengths of the optical / ir bands are : @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 ; whereas the effective wavelengths of the uv bands are : 0.1549 , 0.1799 , 0.2200 , 0.2493 , and 0.3294 @xmath40 . from the original sample ,
we exclude 20 lines of sight because of their negative value of @xmath0 .
negative @xmath0 values are typically the result of noisy data for the lines of sight with small @xmath41 .
a useful method to test if all extinction data points are well fitted by the ccm law is to compute @xmath12 based on equation ( [ chiweighted ] ) normalized to the number of degrees of freedom , which is equal to the number of observed points minus the number of fitted parameters ( in our case the only parameter is @xmath0 ) .
we note that our average @xmath42 is not equal to the expected value of 1 ; since the errors are taken from wegner ( 2002 ) and we do not want to modify them , we do not renormalize our errors requesting @xmath43 . therefore it is safer to treat our @xmath42 as a measure of a relative rather than absolute quality of the ccm fit in the optical / ir and uv wavelength ranges .
we select outliers considering the tail of our @xmath42 distribution .
we assume that the values @xmath44 are indicative of the lines of sight with extinction curves not well fitted by the ccm law .
we find that 25% of the lines of sight of our sample shows this disagreement with the ccm law .
figure [ fig2 ] displays two extinction curves representative of this group . .
the long dashed line represents the ccm curve which is the best fit to the ir data and the point - short dashed line represents the ccm curve which best follows the uv data.,title="fig:",width=302,height=359 ] .
the long dashed line represents the ccm curve which is the best fit to the ir data and the point - short dashed line represents the ccm curve which best follows the uv data.,title="fig:",width=302,height=359 ] we further analyze the lines of sight with @xmath45 for which we expect the ccm law to fit well all observed extinction data from optical / ir to uv .
the usual assumption is that the knowledge of the @xmath0 value obtained from the ir part of the extinction curve may be used to obtain the entire extinction curve by using the ccm law .
we critically test this assumption using two sets of @xmath0 values for each line of sight : the infrared @xmath0 ( @xmath46 ) and ultraviolet @xmath0 ( @xmath47 ) .
we compute the following statistic : @xmath48 + \sigma^2[^{\rm{ir}}\!r_{v}]}}. \label{deviation}\ ] ] specifically , when @xmath49 we classify the line of sight as anomalous in the sense that the ccm law is not able to reproduce the whole extinction curve with a single value of @xmath0 .
values obtained from optical / ir and uv extinction data . the points with error bars are those for which @xmath49.,width=321 ] values are necessary to obtain a good fit to the entire extinction curve.,title="fig:",width=302,height=377 ] values are necessary to obtain a good fit to the entire extinction curve.,title="fig:",width=302,height=377 ] figure [ fig3 ] shows the comparison between the @xmath0 values obtained from optical / ir and uv extinction data . there is a large scatter around the 1-to-1 relationship
; however , only the points with the error bars shown are those which deviate from this relation significantly ( @xmath49 ) . these 25 lines of sight need two different values of @xmath0 to match the optical / ir and uv part of the extinction curve properly .
therefore , in these cases we can not universally use the ccm law to represent the entire extinction curve .
six cases out of 25 have the @xmath50 higher than the @xmath51 one , and the other 19 have the @xmath50 lower than the @xmath51 one .
figure [ fig4 ] shows two examples of such anomalous extinction curves .
we use a @xmath12 minimization method to compute the @xmath0 values for a sample of 436 lines of sight .
we exclude 20 cases because of their negative @xmath0 and analyze the final sample of 416 lines of sight .
we derive our @xmath0 values assuming ccm law .
this law aims at reproducing the entire extinction curve by using only one parameter : @xmath0 .
we analyze the goodness of the ccm fit for all lines of sight using the @xmath42 statistic and test the universality of the ccm law by computing @xmath0 values separately for the optical / ir and uv part of the extinction curve .
we find that for 69% of our original sample , the ccm law is able to fit well both the optical / ir and uv data .
we divide the remaining 31% of cases into two groups , according to two main peculiarities : a ) the optical / ir or / and uv extinction data points can not be fitted by the ccm law ( 25% of the entire sample ) ; b ) @xmath0 values are significantly different for the two spectral regions : optical / ir and uv ( 6% of the entire sample ) .
unless caused by faulty data , peculiar extinction curves result from unusual properties of dust grains .
therefore , theoretical modeling of these extinction curves ( e.g. , mishchenko @xcite ; saija et al .
@xcite ; weingartner & draine @xcite ) may help us to understand the processes which modify the properties of interstellar grains .
50 savage b d and mathis j s 1979 _ ara&a _ * 17 * 73 cardelli j a , clayton g c and mathis j s 1989 _ apj _ * 345 * 245 wegner w 2003 _ astronomische nachrichten _ * 324 * 219 gnaciski p and sikorski j 1999 _ acta astron . _ * 49 * 577 geminale a and popowski p 2004 _ acta astron . _
* 54 * 375 wegner w 2002 _ baltic astronomy _ * 11 * 1 wesselius p r van duinen r j de jonge
a r w aalders j w g luinge w and wildeman k j 1982 _ a&as _ * 49 * 427 gezari d y schmitz m and mead j m 1984 _ nasa ref .
1118 gezari d y schmitz m pitts p s and mead j m 1993 _ nasa ref .
1294 johnson h l 1966 _ ara&a _ * 4 * 193 fernie j d 1983 _ a&as _ * 52 * 75 mishchenko m. i. 1989 _ soviet astr .
* 15 * 299 saija r iat m a borghese f denti p aiello s and cecchi pestellini c 2001 _ apj _ * 559 * 993 weingartner j c and draine b t 2001 _ apj _ * 548 * 296 | interstellar grains affect starlight absorbing scattering photons produce interstellar extinction depends on properties dust size distribution composition average extinction curve wavelength infrared to ultraviolet in savage @xcite shows rises in infrared knee in optical bump at 2175@xmath1 rises far - ultraviolet common between environments properties interstellar grains different in diffuse dense interstellar medium extinction changes @xcite found average extinction law valid over wavelength range @xmath2 applicable to diffuse dense regions depends on parameter @xmath3 @xmath0 parameter ranges 2.0 to 5.5 typical value 3.1 diffuse to dense medium characterizes region extinction value @xmath0 obtain extinction curve from infrared to ultraviolet using ccm law @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath7 wavelength - dependent coefficients different ways obtain @xmath0 using nir uv extinction data wegner @xcite computed @xmath0 values for 597 ob stars near - infrared magnitudes infrared normalized extinction curve proportional to @xmath8 or @xmath9ir interstellar extinction curve to @xmath10 derived @xmath0 as @xmath11 gnaciski sikorski applied @xmath12 minimization method @xmath0 values for ultraviolet uv extinction data linear relation geminale popowski extended analysis non - equal weights observational errors determine @xmath13 @xmath0 values stars with ultraviolet color excesses optical / infrared uv extinction data @xmath0 values for 436 lines of sight two conclusions lines of sight with extinction uv nt follow ccm law lines show extinction curve reproduced with single @xmath0 value wavelength range normalize extinction @xmath15 absolute extinction deduced from relative extinction total - to - selective extinction ratio @xmath0 : @xmath16 @xmath17 each band equation ccmlaw eps combined to derive @xmath0 value @xmath12 minimization obtain @xmath0 value best ccm fit to extinction data gnaciski sikorski suggested @xmath12 minimized to derive @xmath0 : @xmath18 @xmath19 and @xmath20 coefficients of ccm lawprevious work @xcite improved weighted formula find @xmath0 minimize @xmath12 @xmath21 ^2 ~e^2(b - v ){chiweighted} @xmath22 weights each band minimizing equation @xmath0 find @xmath23 @xmath24 values from wegner @xcite computed @xmath25 ={1{e(b - v )^2\sigma^2[e(b - v )(\lambda_i - v)^2 estimate error @xmath0 from @xmath26 sample 436 lines sight optical ir uv extinction data wegner @xcite ultraviolet photometry from wesselius et al . astronomical netherlands satellite infrared magnitudes @xmath27 passbands from catalog gezari schmitz mead gezari @xmath28 @xmath29 magnitudes accuracy @xmath30 mag from johnson @xcite fernie @xcite spectral classification @xmath31 data accuracy @xmath30 mag simbad databaseeffective wavelengths optical / ir bands are @xmath32 effective wavelengths uv bands are 0.1549 0.1799 0.2200 0.2493 0.3294 @xmath40 original sample exclude 20 lines of sight negative value @xmath0 negative @xmath0 values result noisy data lines small @xmath41 test extinction data points fitted compute @xmath12 based equation ) normalized to degrees freedom equal to observed points minus fitted parameters only parameter @xmath0 average @xmath42 not equal to expected value 1 errors taken from wegner ( 2002 ) renormalize errors requesting @xmath43 safer treat @xmath42 as measure relative quality ccm fit in optical / ir and uv wavelength ranges select outliers @xmath42 distribution assume values @xmath44 indicative of lines of sight extinction curves not well fitted 25% lines of sight sample shows disagreement with ccm law figure fig2 ] displays two extinction curves long dashed line represents ccm curve best fit to ir data short dashed line best follows uv datalong dashed line represents ccm curve best fit to ir data short dashed line ccm curve best follows uv data analyze lines of sight with @xmath45 expect ccm law to fit extinction data from optical ir to uv assumption knowledge @xmath0 value from ir curve entire extinction curve ccm law test assumption using two sets @xmath0 values for each infrared and ultraviolet compute statistic : @xmath48 + \sigma^2[\rm\!r_{v]}} @xmath49 line of sight as anomalous ccm law not reproduce whole extinction curve with single value @xmath0 values from optical / ir uv extinction data points with error bars @xmath49 values necessary fit curve figure shows comparison between @xmath0 values from optical / ir uv extinction data large scatter around 1-to-1 relationship points with error bars deviate relation significantly ( @xmath49 ) 25 lines of sight need two different values of @xmath0 to match optical / ir and uv extinction curvenot use ccm law represent entire extinction curve six cases out of 25 have @xmath50 higher than @xmath51 19 @xmath50 lower figure shows anomalous extinction curves use @xmath12 minimization method compute @xmath0 values for 436 lines exclude 20 cases negative @xmath0 analyze final sample 416 lines derive @xmath0 values assuming ccm law law entire extinction curve one parameter @xmath0 analyze ccm fit for using @xmath42 statistic test universality ccm law computing @xmath0 values separately for optical / ir uv part extinction curve for 69% sample ccm law both optical / ir and uv data divide remaining 31% into two groups optical / ir uv extinction data points fitted by ccm law ( 25% @xmath0 values different for two spectral regions optical / ir and uv ( 6% unless faulty peculiar extinction curves result from unusual properties of dust grains theoretical modeling of extinction curves may help understand processes properties interstellar grainssavage mathis j s 1979 ara&a 17 73 cardelli clayton mathis j 1989 345 245 wegner 2003 astronomische nachrichten 324 219 gnaciski sikorski j 1999 acta astron 49 577 geminale popowski p 2004 54 375 wegner 2002 baltic astronomy 11 1 wesselius duinen jonge aalders luinge wildeman k 1982 49 427 gezari schmitz mead j 1984 nasa 1118 pitts mead 1993 1294 johnson h l 1966 ara 4 193 fernie j d 1983 52 75 m 1989 soviet astr 15 299 saija borghese f denti aiello cecchi pestellini 2001 559 993 weingartner j draine b t 2001 548 296 | 0.434535 | 2,870 | 1,483 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,676 | i discuss the theoretical uncertainties in the extraction of @xmath0 from a measurement of the @xmath1 decay rate close to zero recoil .
in particular , i combine previous estimates of the @xmath2 corrections to the normalization of the hadronic form factor at zero recoil with sum rules derived by shifman _
et al_. to obtain a new prediction with less uncertainty .
i also give a prediction for the slope of the form factor @xmath3 at zero recoil : @xmath4 . using the most recent experimental results ,
i obtain the model - independent value @xmath5 .
epsf cern - th.7396/94 + hep - ph/9409306 * theoretical uncertainties in the + extraction of @xmath6 + from @xmath1 decays near zero recoil * matthias neubert + _ theory division , cern , ch-1211 geneva 23 , switzerland + ( e - mail : neubert@cernvm.cern.ch)_ _ invited talk presented at the 27th international conference on high energy physics + glasgow , scotland , 2027 july 1994 _
cern - th.7396/94 + september 1994 | with the discovery of heavy quark symmetry ( for a review see ref .
@xcite and references therein ) , it has become clear that the study of exclusive semileptonic @xmath1 decays close to zero recoil allows for a reliable determination of the cabibbo
maskawa matrix element @xmath7 , which is free , to a large extent , of hadronic uncertainties @xcite@xcite .
model dependence enters this analysis only at the level of power corrections , which are suppressed by a factor of at least @xmath8 .
these corrections can be investigated in a systematic way using the heavy quark effective theory @xcite .
they are found to be small , of the order of a few per cent . until recently ,
this method to determine @xmath0 was limited by large experimental uncertainties of about 1520% , which were much larger than the theoretical uncertainties in the analysis of symmetry - breaking corrections . however , three collaborations have now presented results of higher precision @xcite@xcite .
it is thus important to reconsider the status of the theoretical analysis , even more so since the original calculation of power corrections in ref .
@xcite has become the subject of controversy @xcite .
the differential decay rate for the process @xmath9 is given by @xcite @xmath10\,|\,v_{cb}|^2\,\eta_a^2\,\widehat\xi^{\,2}(w ) \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath11 denotes the product of the meson velocities .
i have factorized the hadronic form factor for this decay into a short - distance coefficient @xmath12 and a function @xmath3 , which contains the long - distance hadronic dynamics . apart from corrections of order @xmath13
, this function coincides with the isgur wise form factor @xcite .
luke s theorem determines the normalization of @xmath3 at zero recoil ( @xmath14 ) up to second - order power corrections @xcite : @xmath15 the strategy is to obtain the product @xmath16 from a measurement of the differential decay rate , and to extrapolate it to @xmath14 to extract @xmath17 the task of theorists is to provide a reliable calculation of @xmath12 and @xmath18 in order to turn this measurement into a precise determination of @xmath0 .
the short - distance coefficient @xmath12 takes into account a finite renormalization of the axial vector current in the region @xmath19 .
its calculation is a straightforward application of qcd perturbation theory . at the one - loop order
, one finds @xcite @xmath20 the scale of the running coupling constant is not determined at this order .
choosing @xmath21 between @xmath22 and @xmath23 , and using @xmath24 , one obtains values in the range @xmath25 .
the scale ambiguity leads to an uncertainty of order @xmath26 ^ 2\sim 2\%$ ] .
the calculation can be improved by using the renormalization group to resum the leading and next - to - leading logarithms of the type @xmath27^n$ ] , @xmath28^n$ ] , and @xmath29^n$ ] to all orders in perturbation theory @xcite@xcite .
a consistent scheme for a next - to - leading - order calculation of @xmath30 has been developed in ref .
the result is @xmath31 where @xmath32 , and @xmath33 .
the numerical result is very stable under changes of the input parameters . for @xmath34 gev ( for 4 flavours ) and @xmath24 , one obtains @xmath35 .
the uncertainty arising from next - to - next - to - leading corrections is of order @xmath36 . taking this into account ,
i think it is conservative to increase the error by a factor 2.5 and quote @xmath37
hadronic uncertainties enter the determination of @xmath0 at the level of second - order power corrections , which are expected to be of order @xmath38 . for a precision measurement , it is important to understand the structure of these corrections in detail .
falk and myself have derived the exact expression @xcite @xmath39 which depends upon five hadronic parameters : @xmath40 and @xmath41 parametrize the deficit in the `` wave - function overlap '' between @xmath42- and @xmath43-flavoured pseudoscalar ( _ p _ ) and vector ( _ v _ ) mesons , for instance @xmath44 the parameter @xmath45 is proportional to the kinetic energy of the heavy quark inside a heavy meson , @xmath46 gev@xmath47 is determined by the vector
pseudoscalar mass splitting , and @xmath48 parametrizes certain matrix elements containing double insertions of the chromo - magnetic operator . with the exception of @xmath49 , estimates of these parameters
are model - dependent . in ref .
@xcite , we made the simplifying assumptions that @xmath50 , and that the corrections represented by @xmath48 are negligible .
the latter one is based on the observation that these corrections involve a double insertion of an operator that breaks the heavy quark spin symmetry .
using then reasonable values such as @xmath51 gev@xmath47 and @xmath52 gev@xmath47 , one obtains @xmath53 . here and in the following ,
i take @xmath54 gev and @xmath55 gev for the heavy quark masses . in ref .
@xcite , the error in the estimate of @xmath18 has been increased to @xmath56 in order to account for the model dependence and higher - order corrections .
a very similar result , @xmath57 , has been obtained by mannel @xcite .
recently , shifman _
et al_. have suggested an alternative approach to obtain an estimate of @xmath18 , which is based on bounds derived using sum rules and the operator product expansion @xcite .
these bounds imply the inequalities @xmath58 the upper bound for @xmath18 implies that @xmath59 . in ref .
@xcite , this number is quoted as 0.94 . in the same reference , the authors give an `` educated guess '' @xmath60 corresponding to @xmath61 .
however , the arguments presented to support this guess are not very rigorous .
it is possible to combine the above approaches to reduce the theoretical uncertainty in the estimate of @xmath18 @xcite .
the idea is to use the sum rules to constrain the hadronic parameters in ( [ delm2 ] ) in a threefold way : ( i ) the first relation in ( [ sumruls ] ) implies that @xmath62 excluding some of the values for the parameter @xmath63 used in previous analyses .
( ii ) comparing the third relation in ( [ sumruls ] ) with ( [ delm2 ] ) in the limit @xmath64 , one finds that @xmath65 ( iii ) finally , @xmath40 and @xmath41 are correlated in such a way that @xmath66 if @xmath48 is not too large . to illustrate this last point ,
let me define new parameters @xmath67 in terms of these , @xmath68 using the inequalities ( [ sumruls ] ) , one can show that @xmath69 and @xmath70 , with @xcite @xmath71 where @xmath72 .
there are thus three effects , which decrease @xmath18 with respect to the estimate given in ref .
@xcite : a large value of @xmath73 , a positive value of @xmath48 , and the fact that for small @xmath48 the difference @xmath74 is centred around @xmath75 ( i.e. @xmath76 is centred around 0 ) .
= 9.5 cm in evaluating ( [ final ] ) , i will take @xmath77 gev@xmath47 , which is consistent with the bound in ( [ lam1bou ] ) and with the value @xmath78 gev@xmath47 obtained from qcd sum rules @xcite .
varying @xmath79 in the range between 0.36 and 0.5 gev@xmath47 does not alter the results very much .
the main uncertainty comes from the unknown values of the parameters @xmath80 and @xmath48 . as a guideline
, one may employ the constituent quark model of isgur _
et al_. @xcite , in which one uses non - relativistic harmonic oscillator wave functions for the ground - state heavy mesons , for instance @xmath81 , where @xmath82 is the reduced mass .
one then obtains @xmath83 gev@xmath47 , where i use @xmath84 gev for the light constituent quark mass .
however , this estimate of @xmath80 is probably somewhat too low .
lattice studies of heavy - light wave functions suggest an exponential behaviour of the form @xmath85 @xcite , which leads to @xmath86 gev@xmath47 .
values much larger than this are unlikely , since i use a rather large constituent quark mass @xmath87 .
in fact , adopting the point of view that the sum rules for @xmath40 and @xmath41 are saturated to approximately 50% by the ground - state contribution @xcite , one would expect @xmath88 gev@xmath47 , which seems a very reasonable value to me . in fig .
[ fig1 ] , i show the allowed regions for @xmath18 as a function of @xmath48 for two values of @xmath80 .
i think it is reasonable to assume that @xmath48 is of a magnitude similar to @xmath49 or smaller .
thus , i conclude that for all reasonable choices of parameters the results are in the range @xmath89 which is consistent with the previous estimates in refs .
@xcite at the @xmath90 level
. a more precise determination of the parameter @xmath80 would help to reduce the uncertainty in this number .
in the extrapolation of the differential decay rate ( [ bdrate ] ) to zero recoil , the slope of the function @xmath3 close to @xmath14 plays an important role . one defines a parameter @xmath91 by @xmath92 it is important to distinguish @xmath91 from the slope parameter @xmath93 of the isgur wise function .
they differ by corrections that break the heavy quark symmetry . whereas the slope of the isgur wise function is a universal , mass - independent parameter , the slope of the physical form factor depends on logarithms and inverse powers of the heavy quark masses . on the other hand
, @xmath91 is an observable quantity , while the value of @xmath93 depends on the renormalization scheme . to illustrate this last point ,
let me neglect for the moment @xmath13 corrections and work in the leading logarithmic approximation .
then the relation between the physical slope parameter @xmath91 and the slope parameter @xmath94 of the regularized isgur
wise function is @xcite @xmath95 where @xmath96 is the renormalization scale , and @xmath97 is an undetermined ( at this order ) scale between @xmath98 and @xmath99 . the last equation can be used to define the @xmath96-independent slope of the renormalized isgur wise function ( see ref .
@xcite for the generalization of this definition to next - to - leading order ) . if next - to - leading logarithmic corrections are taken into account , the scale ambiguity related to the choice of @xmath97 is resolved , and one obtains @xmath100 the @xmath13 corrections to this relation have been investigated and are found to be negative . however , any such estimate is model - dependent and thus has a large theoretical uncertainty .
the result is @xmath101 @xcite .
predictions for the renormalized slope parameter @xmath93 are available from qcd sum rules including a next - to - leading - order renormalization - group improvement .
one obtains @xmath102 @xcite .
i thus expect @xmath103
using the updated values @xmath104 and @xmath105 , i obtain for the normalization of the hadronic form factor at zero recoil : @xmath106 three experiments have recently presented new measurements of the product @xmath107 . when rescaled using the new lifetime values @xmath108
ps and @xmath109 ps @xcite , the results obtained from a linear fit to the data are @xmath110 where the first error is statistical and the second systematic .
i will follow the suggestion of ref .
@xcite and add @xmath111 to these values to account for the curvature of the function @xmath3 . taking the weighted average of the experimental results and using the theoretical prediction ( [ etaxi ] ) ,
i then obtain @xmath112 which corresponds to a model - independent measurement of @xmath0 with 7% accuracy .
this is by far the most accurate determination to date . neglecting @xmath13 corrections ,
i have related the physical slope parameter @xmath91 to the slope of the isgur wise function and obtain the prediction @xmath4 .
it compares well with the average value observed by experiments , which is @xmath113 @xcite@xcite .
t. browder ( cleo collaboration ) , talk presented at the 27th international conference on high energy physics ( ichep94 ) , glasgow , scotland , july 1994 ; b. barish _
et al_. ( cleo collaboration ) , cornell preprint clns 94/1285 , submitted to ichep94 . | discovery of heavy quark symmetry review see ref @xcite references study of semileptonic @xmath1 decays close to zero recoil allows reliable determination cabibbo maskawa matrix element @xmath7 free of hadronic uncertainties model dependence enters analysis at level power corrections suppressed by factor @xmath8 corrections investigated using heavy quark effective theory found small few per cent method @xmath0 limited by large experimental uncertainties 1520% larger than theoretical uncertainties symmetry - breaking corrections three collaborations presented results higher precision important reconsider status theoretical analysis original calculation of power corrections @xcite subject of controversy differential decay rate for process @xmath9 given by @xcite @xmath10 @xmath11 product meson velocities factorized hadronic form factor for decay into short - distance coefficient @xmath12 function @xmath3 long - distance hadronic dynamics function coincides with isgur wise form factor @xciteluke s theorem determines normalization @xmath3 at zero recoil @xmath14 second - power corrections @xmath15 strategy obtain product @xmath16 from differential decay rate extrapolate @xmath14 extract @xmath17 task reliable calculation @xmath12 @xmath18 precise determination @xmath0 short - distance coefficient @xmath12 finite renormalization axial vector current region @xmath19 calculation qcd perturbation theory one - loop order @xmath20 scale running coupling constant not determined choosing @xmath21 between @xmath22 @xmath24 obtains values range @xmath25 scale ambiguity leads uncertainty order @xmath26 calculation renormalization group resum leading next - - leading logarithms @xmath27 all orders perturbation theory consistent scheme next - to - leading order calculation @xmath30 developed result is @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 numerical result stable under changes input parameters @xmath34 @xmath24 obtains @xmath35 uncertainty from leading corrections order @xmath36conservative increase error factor 2.5 quote @xmath37 hadronic uncertainties enter determination @xmath0 second - order power corrections expected order @xmath38 precision measurement important understand structure corrections falk derived expression @xcite @xmath39 depends five hadronic parameters @xmath40 @xmath41 parametrize deficit wave - function overlap @xmath42 @xmath43 pseudoscalar vector mesons @xmath44 parameter @xmath45 proportional kinetic energy heavy quark @xmath46@xmath47 determined vector pseudoscalar mass splitting @xmath48 parametrizes matrix elements double insertions chromo - magnetic operator exception @xmath49 estimates parameters model - dependent assumptions @xmath50 corrections @xmath48 negligible corrections involve double insertion operator breaks heavy quark spin symmetry reasonable values @xmath51 gev@xmath47 @xmath52 gev@xmath47 obtains @xmath53 take @xmath54 gev @xmath55 gev for heavy quark masses error estimate @xmath18 increased to @xmath56 model dependence higher - order corrections similar result @xmath57 obtained by mannel @xcite shifmansuggested alternative approach estimate @xmath18 based on bounds sum rules operator product expansion @xcite bounds imply inequalities @xmath58 upper bound @xmath18 implies @xmath59 in ref @xcite number quoted as 0.94 authors give educated guess @xmath60 corresponding to @xmath61 arguments guess not rigorous possible combine approaches reduce theoretical uncertainty estimate @xmath18 use sum rules constrain hadronic parameters in ( [ delm2 ] ) first relation implies @xmath62 excluding values parameter @xmath63 comparing third relation with delm2 limit @xmath64 finds @xmath65 @xmath40 @xmath41 correlated @xmath66 if @xmath48 not too large define new parameters @xmath67 @xmath68 using inequalities sumruls show @xmath69 and @xmath70 with @xcite @xmath71 @xmath72 three effects decrease @xmath18 estimate @xcite : large value of @xmath73 positive value of @xmath48 small @xmath48 difference @xmath74 centred around @xmath75 @xmath76 centred around 0 )9.5 cm evaluating take @xmath77 gev@xmath47 consistent with bound value @xmath78 gev@xmath47 from qcd sum rules @xcite varying @xmath79 0.36 0.5 gev@xmath47 alter results uncertainty from unknown values parameters @xmath80 @xmath48 employ constituent quark model isgur al non - relativistic harmonic oscillator wave functions for heavy mesons @xmath81 @xmath82 reduced mass obtains @xmath83 gev@xmath47 @xmath84 gev light constituent quark mass estimate @xmath80 too low studies heavy light wave suggest exponential behaviour form @xmath85 @xcite leads to @xmath86 gev@xmath47 values larger unlikely large constituent quark mass @xmath87 sum rules @xmath40 @xmath41 saturated 50% by ground - state contribution @xcite expect @xmath88 gev@xmath47 reasonable value fig allowed regions @xmath18 function of @xmath48 two values @xmath80 assume @xmath48 similar to @xmath49 or smaller conclude reasonable choices parameters results range @xmath89 consistent with previous estimates @xmath90 levelprecise determination parameter @xmath80 uncertainty extrapolation differential decay rate to zero recoil slope function @xmath3 close to @xmath14 parameter @xmath91 @xmath92 distinguish @xmath91 from slope @xmath93 isgur wise function differ by corrections break heavy quark symmetry slope universal mass - independent physical form factor depends on logarithms inverse powers heavy quark masses @xmath91 observable quantity value @xmath93 depends on renormalization scheme neglect @xmath13 corrections work leading logarithmic approximation relation between physical slope parameter @xmath91 and slope @xmath94 regularized isgur wise function is @xcite @xmath95 @xmath96 is renormalization scale @xmath97 undetermined scale between @xmath98 and @xmath99 last equation define @xmath96-independent slope of renormalized isgur wise function generalization next - leading order if logarithmic corrections scale ambiguity choice @xmath97 resolved obtains @xmath100 @xmath13 corrections negative estimate model - dependent large theoretical uncertainty result is @xmath101 @xcite .predictions renormalized slope parameter @xmath93 from qcd sum rules next - order renormalization - group improvement obtains @xmath102 expect @xmath103 using updated values @xmath104 @xmath105 obtain normalization hadronic form factor at zero recoil @xmath106 three experiments presented new measurements product @xmath107 rescaled using new values @xmath108 @xmath109 results are @xmath110 first error statistical second systematic add @xmath111 curvature function @xmath3 weighted average experimental results theoretical prediction obtain @xmath112 model - independent measurement @xmath0 with 7% accuracy most accurate determination date neglecting corrections related physical slope parameter @xmath91 to slope isgur wise function obtain prediction @xmath4 compares with average value @xmath113 @xcite browder talk 27th international conference high energy physics glasgow scotland july 1994 barish cornell preprint clns 94/1285 submitted ichep94 | 0.435469 | 2,977 | 1,564 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,680 | long - standing discrepancies within determinations of the ginzburg - landau parameter @xmath0 from supercritical field measurements on superconducting microspheres are reexamined . the discrepancy in tin
is shown to result from differing methods of analyses , whereas the discrepancy in indium is a consequence of significantly differing experimental results .
the reanalyses however confirms the lower @xmath0 determinations to within experimental uncertainties . | the ginzburg - landau parameter of a superconductor , @xmath0 , is generally defined as the ratio of its magnetic penetration depth ( @xmath1 ) to its coherence length ( @xmath2 ) at the thermodynamical critical temperature ( @xmath3 ) .
the parameter relates the two fundamental length scales of the material s superconducting phase , distinguishes whether the phase transition is first- or second - order , and characterizes the material s response to applied magnetic fields in the superconducting state .
theoretically , for clean materials , it is given by the bcs @xmath0 = 0.96 @xmath4(0)/@xmath5 where @xmath4(0 ) is the london penetration depth at zero temperature and @xmath5 is the pippard coherence length @xcite .
the parameter , although often referred to , is infrequently measured and little tabulated owing to its dependence on sample purity and structure . where measured ,
@xmath0 has been determined @xcite from independent measurements of @xmath1 and the thermodynamic critical field @xmath6 , as well as from magnetization measurements on thin films and foils of various materials @xcite . for type - i materials
( @xmath7 1/@xmath8 ) , another technique has been from measurements of the supercritical fields of microspheres .
this technique has been used in determining the @xmath0 of aluminum @xcite , cadmium @xcite , gallium @xcite , mercury @xcite , indium @xcite , lead @xcite , tin @xcite , thallium @xcite and zinc @xcite , as well as a series of alloys @xcite .
inexplicably , the results are generally @xmath9 factor 2 smaller than the thin film / foil determinations as well as the bcs - defined @xmath0 , as shown in table i. more recent measurements , using a fast pulse induction technique with thin foils , provide results in better agreement with those from the microspheres @xcite .
.comparison of ginzburg - landau parameter determinations ; `` - '' denotes no experimental measurement . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
the supercritical fields determinations of all reports are obtained from hysteresis curves of the first order tin and indium transitions .
different reports have however assumed different definitions of the critical fields within the hysteresis curves , as shown schematically in fig .
5 . as evident
, these definitions alone can lead to an appreciable variation in the reported @xmath10 . in general , the @xmath11 , @xmath12 parameters of fm should be consistently higher than sbc , which is not observed in the case of fm @xmath11 .
in the case of single grain measurements , variations in the supercritical fields arise mainly from the grain metallurgy .
fm performed careful investigations of defects as part of their study .
the hysteresis curves were measured as a function of the orientation of the spheres in the applied field , and the @xmath11 , @xmath12 taken from the direction yielding the lowest values ( i.e. highest @xmath13 , lowest @xmath14 ) .
the results are strongly dependent on @xmath3 . in principle , for @xmath15 , the coherence length is sufficiently large that these effects are negligible ; at lower temperatures , the coherence length is smaller than the defect and the effects are more noticeable . for this reason ,
fm also employed @xmath16 ( @xmath14/@xmath13)@xmath17 as a comparison for @xmath18 , which has the advantage of being insensitive to @xmath3 since it is independent of @xmath6 . in the case of the suspension measurements ,
the deformation of the hysteresis from the rectangular single sphere cycle is due largely to the interplay between defects and diamagnetic interactions between the spheres @xcite . at lower temperatures , defects in the sphere metallurgy
may significantly reduce the superheating capacity of the material , resulting in a lowered transition field such as observed in the indium data of sbc . however , the defects should also serve as nucleation centers for `` early '' normal ( n ) @xmath19 superconducting ( s ) transitions at lower temperatures , which is not observed . on the other hand
, the advantage of the multisphere measurement lies in the averaging over the defect contribution - the last sphere to transition to the normal state is the most defect - free sphere of the suspension . the recent work of pearanda et .
@xcite has demonstrated significant diamagnetic interactions even for filling factors as small as 5% .
these may vary from one suspension to another of the same material as a result of inhomogeneous distributions .
although the last sphere to transition in the s @xmath19 n case is effectively free of diamagnetic interactions , this is not true for the n @xmath19 s where diamagnetic interactions are a maximum .
as the field decrease continues , the new n @xmath19 s transitions enhance the local diamagnetic contribution to the local fields of those spheres still normal .
this would suggest that the @xmath18 determinations with suspensions are lower than actual by some amount proportional to the diamagnetic interactions , since the local field is higher . as seen in fig .
1(a ) , the sbc h@xmath20 for tin is essentially the same as those of the fm single sphere
. for indium however , the sbc @xmath21 are systematically lower than those of fm by @xmath9 10% for @xmath22 0.8 .
hysteresis curve schematic , indicating the various field definitions for @xmath13 , @xmath14 employed by sbc and fm.,width=8 ] all results were moreover obtained by variation of the magnetic field , rather than temperature , which as shown by chaddah and roy @xcite results in an enhanced @xmath21 , apart from any diamagnetic interaction , as a result of the thermal fluctuations induced by the field changes themselves .
the variation of @xmath0 with temperature suggests a variation of the transition order with temperature , which has possibly important ramifications since @xmath0 is then less a fundamental property of the superconductor than a simple ratio between the two characteristic lengths in the description , both of which vary with temperature and yield results consistent with the observed @xmath0 determinations .
variation of the order of the transition with the temperature is predicted in recent renormalization - based reformulations of basic superconductive theory @xcite , which include fluctuations in the involved gauge and scalar fields , and result in a dividing line between type - i and -ii behavior at @xmath23 with a magnetic response which can be varied between type - i and type - ii simply by temperature change .
this variation has been seen in magnetization measurement of nitrogen - doped ta ( @xmath0 = 0.665 ) @xcite , but is otherwise unconfirmed .
reexamination of previous ginzburg - landau parameter determinations from superheating field measurements of microspheres of tin and indium shows the long - standing discrepancy in reported @xmath24 of tin to derive from the different analyses methods employed , rather than whether single- or multi - grain determinations , or grain metallurgy .
although the tin results of sbc can be made to agree with those of fm ( and larrea et .
al . ) , the customary analyses via eq . ( 2 ) is in disagreement with that performed numerically .
this is not the case of indium , where the discrepancy reflects severe differences in the supercritical field measurements themselves .
the similar reexamination of the supercooling field measurements uncovers no divergences capable of explaining the discrepancies with the measurements of ref .
@xcite . to the contrary ,
the variation of @xmath14 with @xmath25 appears to confirm the latter , raising severe questions as to the true significance of @xmath0 as a descriptor of superconductors .
the resolution of these is however beyond the scope of this work .
the available @xmath26 1 data is of insufficient precision to permit more than suggestions as to @xmath0 .
analyses of all superheating results via the pad approximation yields a convergence of @xmath24 , @xmath18 to @xmath0 , with values for each material only slightly different from those previously reported on the basis of @xmath21 alone .
these previous results however are likely larger than actual as a result of diamagnetic interactions between the superconducting sphere population . apart from nonlocal effects ,
the large @xmath11 for @xmath26 0.8 is likely due to defect presence , which causes nucleation of the normal state to occur at fields below the maximal @xmath27 .
these become unimportant as @xmath28 1 , increasing @xmath13 and generating a rapid drop in @xmath11 . whether the proper analyses is by eq .
( 2a ) , numerical or pad remains in question . nevertheless , all of the materials analyzed in ref .
@xcite ( tin , indium , thallium , lead and mercury ) follow from the sbc fig . 1 ; in contrast , the analyses of the remaining refs . has proceeded via eq .
( 2 ) , which is seen to underestimate the respective @xmath10 . in view of the significance of the ginzburg - landau parameter ,
the uncertainties inherent to this technique and the variation in experimentally - obtained results , and technological advances over the last thirty years , careful remeasurements of the supercritical fields over the full temperature range , and their analysis within a definitive description of the @xmath29 plane , would seem to be indicated . the discrepancy in @xmath0 between spheres and thin film / foil determinations has been known for some decades , but to the best of our knowledge remains unexplained .
the thin film / foil results are in fact a factor @xmath9 1.7 larger than those from the microspheres ; they are also in better agreement with @xmath0 derived from @xmath30 via @xmath31 , and also agree in general with the lower temperature results of the microspheres .
we thank j. seco for preliminary investigations of the discrepancy which stimulated the re - analyses herein , a. baptista for assistance in last phases of the analysis , and g. waysand for critical comments .
the work was supported in part by grants praxis / fis/10033/1998 and pocti / fnu/39067/2001 of the foundation for science and technology of portugal , co - financed by feder . | ginzburg - landau parameter of superconductor @xmath0 defined as ratio magnetic penetration depth to coherence length at thermodynamical critical temperature relates two length scales material superconducting phase distinguishes phase transition or characterizes response to magnetic fields in state for clean materials given by bcs @xmath0 = 0.96 @xmath4(0)/@xmath5(0 london penetration depth at zero temperature pippard coherence length parameter infrequently measured little tabulated on sample purity structure determined from measurements of @xmath1 thermodynamic critical field @xmath6 magnetization measurements on thin films foils for type - i materials ( @xmath7 1/@xmath8 ) technique from measurements of supercritical fields of microspheres technique used in determining @xmath0 of aluminum cadmium gallium mercury indium lead tin thallium zinc alloys results factor 2 smaller than thin film / foil determinations bcs - defined @xmath0 recent measurements fast pulse induction technique with thin foils provide results better with microspherescomparison ginzburg - landau parameter determinations - '' no experimental measurement cols="^^",options="header " supercritical fields determinations from hysteresis curves first order tin indium transitions different reports assumed different definitions critical fields hysteresis curves shown fig . 5 definitions can lead variation in reported @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 parameters fm should higher than sbc not observed fm @xmath11 single grain measurements variations supercritical fields arise from grain metallurgy fm performed investigations defects hysteresis curves measured orientation spheres field @xmath11 @xmath12 taken from direction lowest values highest results dependent on @xmath3 for @xmath15 coherence length large effects negligible lower temperatures coherence length smaller effects more noticeable fm employed @xmath16@xmath17 comparison for @xmath18 insensitive to @xmath3 independent of @xmath6 suspension measurements deformation hysteresis from rectangular single sphere cycle due to interplay defects diamagnetic interactions sphereslower temperatures defects in sphere metallurgy reduce superheating capacity lowered transition field indium data defects nucleation centers for early normal @xmath19 superconducting transitions not observed advantage multisphere measurement averaging over defect contribution last sphere to transition normal most defect - free work pearanda @xcite demonstrated diamagnetic interactions for filling factors small 5% vary from inhomogeneous distributions last sphere to transition @xmath19 n case free of diamagnetic interactions not true for n @xmath19 s interactions maximum field decrease continues new @xmath19 s transitions enhance local diamagnetic contribution fields @xmath18 determinations with suspensions lower than actual proportional to diamagnetic interactions local field higher fig . 1(a sbc h@xmath20 for tin same as fm single sphere indium sbc @xmath21 lower than fm by 10% for @xmath22 0.8 hysteresis curve schematic field definitions for @xmath13 @xmath14 by sbc fm.=8 results obtained by variation magnetic field temperature by results in enhanced @xmath21 thermal fluctuations field variation of @xmath0 with temperature suggests variation transition order less fundamental property than ratio between two characteristic lengths vary with yield results with variation of transition with temperature predicted in renormalization reformulations superconductive theory include fluctuations in gauge scalar fields in dividing line between type - i and -ii behavior at @xmath23 with magnetic response varied by temperature change variation seen in magnetization measurement of nitrogen - doped ta ( @xmath0 = 0.665 ) @xcite unconfirmed of ginzburg - landau parameter determinations from superheating field measurements of microspheres tin indium shows discrepancy in @xmath24 of tin from different analyses methods single multi - grain determinations metallurgy tin results of sbc with fm ( larrea et customary analyses via eq 2 with not case of indium discrepancy reflects differences in supercritical field measurements supercooling field measurements uncovers no divergences explaining discrepancies with measurements ref@xcite variation of @xmath14 with @xmath25 raising questions significance of @xmath0 superconductors resolution beyond scope work @xmath26 1 data insufficient precision suggestions @xmath0 analyses superheating results via pad approximation convergence of @xmath24 @xmath18 to @xmath0 values slightly different from @xmath21 previous results likely larger than diamagnetic interactions superconducting sphere population large @xmath11 for @xmath26 0.8 likely due to defect presence nucleation at fields below maximal @xmath27 unimportant as @xmath28 1 increasing @xmath13 rapid drop in @xmath11 analyses by eq . ( 2a ) numerical or pad in question materials analyzed in ref. @xcite ( tin indium thallium lead mercury ) follow from sbc fig . 1 analyses remaining refs via eq . ( 2 ) @xmath10 significance ginzburg - landau parameter uncertainties variation in results technological advances remeasurements of supercritical fields over full temperature range analysis description @xmath29 planediscrepancy in @xmath0 between spheres thin film / foil known decades remains unexplained thin film foil results factor @xmath9 1.7 larger than microspheres with @xmath0 @xmath30 @xmath31 lower temperature results microspheres thank j. seco re - analyses a. baptista g. waysand comments work supported by grants praxis / fis/10033/1998 pocti / fnu/39067/2001 foundation for science technology of portugal co - financed by feder | 0.354054 | 2,280 | 1,176 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,685 | since the discovery of the @xmath0 in 2003 the b - factory experiments babar and belle have been driving forces in the spectroscopy of new charmonium - like states . in this article
the latest results on the decays @xmath1 and @xmath2 , where @xmath3 stands for @xmath4 or @xmath5 , are presented and analyses of @xmath6 and @xmath7 are discussed . | several new states have been discovered in the last few years @xcite , most of them at b - factories .
the b - factories provide a clean environment to search for and study these new particles either in @xmath8 meson decays or in the production in @xmath9 reactions with initial state radiation . in this article the recent analyses of new states in @xmath8
decays are presented .
both experiments , babar and belle , together have now a total sample of 1.3 billion @xmath10 pairs available .
the oldest member of the family of new charmonium - like states is the @xmath0 , discovered by belle in 2003 @xcite . despite several measurements of its properties at b - factories and at the tevatron the nature of this particle
is still unknown .
it does not fit into the predicted spectrum of conventional chamonium states . since its mass is very close to the @xmath11 threshold the hypothesis of a @xmath11 molecule
is considered @xcite .
another explanation is a bound state of a diquark and an anti - diquark @xcite .
it is also possible , though unlikely , that the @xmath0 is a @xmath12 state and our theoretical models fail to describe it .
therefore the observation of the @xmath13 was received with great interest .
as it is charged it can not be a conventional charmonium state .
the decay @xmath15 with @xmath16 was first observed by belle in 2006 with a significance of 6.4 standard deviations @xcite .
this observation was confirmed by babar last year @xcite . in @xmath17
decays , where the @xmath18 is reconstructed via @xmath19 or @xmath20 , babar sees an excess near threshold with a significance of 4.9@xmath21 ( see fig . [
fig : x3872dds ] left ) .
a template fit is performed that takes into account threshold effects .
while the width of @xmath22 mev is consistent with other measurements , the mass of @xmath23 mev does not agree with of the mass of @xmath24 mev that is obtained by averaging the measurements in the @xmath25 mode .
this may raise the question whether the same particle is observed in both modes or whether there are additional threshold effects .
belle updated their analysis now including @xmath26
@xcite . combining both @xmath27 modes , a signal with a significance of 8.8@xmath21 is observed ( see fig . [
fig : x3872dds ] right ) .
a fit with a relativistic breit - wigner function and mass - dependent resolution yields @xmath28 mev , @xmath29 mev , and @xmath30 . while the mass is closer to the average value in the @xmath31 mode , some uncertainty due to the line shape model remains .
an alternative fit using a flatt function which assumes a mass below threshold @xcite is able to describe the data , too .
mass distribution measured by babar ( left ) and by belle for @xmath26 ( top right ) and @xmath32 ( bottom right ) . ] mass distribution measured by babar ( left ) and by belle for @xmath26 ( top right ) and @xmath32 ( bottom right ) .
evidence for the decay @xmath15 with @xmath34 was first seen in 2005 by belle with a significance of 4.0@xmath21 @xcite and one year later by babar with 3.4@xmath21 @xcite .
now babar presented an updated analysis adding @xmath35 events and considering also @xmath36 decays @xcite .
signals with a significance of 3.6@xmath21 and 3.5@xmath21 are seen in the @xmath37 and @xmath38 modes , respectively ( see fig . [
fig : x3872psigamma ] ) . for the @xmath8 decays to @xmath39 branching ratios of @xmath40 and @xmath41 are measured .
limits for the other three @xmath8 decay modes where no significant signal is observed are quoted
. the determined relative branching ratio of @xmath42 is orders of magnitude higher than expected in @xmath11 molecule models @xcite .
( left ) and @xmath38 ( right ) mass distribution measured by babar .
the four plots for each mode correspond to @xmath8 decays channels with @xmath43 ( a ) , @xmath44 ( b ) , @xmath45 ( c ) , and @xmath46 ( d ) . ] ( left ) and @xmath38 ( right ) mass distribution measured by babar .
the four plots for each mode correspond to @xmath8 decays channels with @xmath43 ( a ) , @xmath44 ( b ) , @xmath45 ( c ) , and @xmath46 ( d ) . ]
in 2008 belle published the observation of a resonance in the @xmath48 invariant mass spectrum in @xmath49 decays with a significance of 6.5@xmath21 @xcite . in this analysis events with a @xmath50 mass consistent with a @xmath51 or @xmath52 were removed and the resulting @xmath53 distribution was fitted . from the fit the mass @xmath54 mev , the width @xmath55 mev , and the branching ratio @xmath56 were extracted .
babar performed a detailed study of @xmath57 and @xmath49 decays @xcite . as the most prominent features in the dalitz plot are the @xmath51 and @xmath52 resonances a good understanding of the @xmath50 mass spectrum is important .
babar is able to describe it well with @xmath58- , @xmath59- , and @xmath60-waves .
this composition and the angular distributions of the components have a strong influence on the @xmath61 mass spectrum . on the other hand they can not create narrow peaks in the @xmath62 distribution .
babar looks at the @xmath63 and @xmath48 mass distributions for all events , events in the @xmath51 and @xmath52 region , and events outside the @xmath64 regions and compares them to the projections of the @xmath50 components ( see fig .
[ fig : zpsipi ] left ) .
no signal is seen in the @xmath65 spectra and no significant signal in the @xmath53 spectra . for the total sample
there is an excess of 2.7@xmath21 in the @xmath48 mass distribution at @xmath66 mev with @xmath67 mev . using the values measured by belle a 95% confidence level limit on the branching ratio of @xmath68
a comparison of the background subtracted @xmath53 distribution with the one published by belle shows good statistical agreement .
belle reanalyzed their data with a fit to the dalitz plot taking into account all known @xmath50 resonances @xcite .
the fit with @xmath69 resonance included ( solid line in fig .
[ fig : zpsipi ] right ) describes the data significantly better than without ( dotted line ) by 6.4@xmath21 .
systematic variation of the fit model yield a significance of 5.4@xmath21 .
the updated measurements of the @xmath70 properties are @xmath71 mev , @xmath72 mev , and @xmath73 . and @xmath48 mass distributions for all events and events inside and outside the @xmath51 and @xmath52 regions measured by babar ( left ) .
invariant @xmath48 mass distributions in different regions of @xmath74 measured by belle ( right ) . ] and @xmath48 mass distributions for all events and events inside and outside the @xmath51 and @xmath52 regions measured by babar ( left ) .
invariant @xmath48 mass distributions in different regions of @xmath74 measured by belle ( right ) . ]
as the first candidate for a charged exotic state was observed as a @xmath48 resonance , this suggests to search for similar charged states in combinations of other charmionia with pions . in a dalitz plot analysis of @xmath76 events including
all known @xmath50 resonances belle observes two new states , called @xmath77 and @xmath78 @xcite ( see fig .
[ fig : zchic1pi ] ) . from the change in the fit likelihood value a significance of the two-@xmath69-state versus the no-@xmath69-state hypothesis of 13.2@xmath21 is determined .
taking into account systematic variations of the fit model the significance is at least 8.1@xmath21 .
compared to the one-@xmath69-state hypothesis the two states are favored by 5.7@xmath21 , or 5.0@xmath21 including systematics .
the masses , widths and branching ratios of the two new states are measured to be @xmath79 mev , @xmath80 mev , @xmath81 mev , @xmath82 mev , @xmath83 , and @xmath84 .
mass distributions for different @xmath74 regions measured by belle with fit projection assuming no @xmath69 state ( left ) and two @xmath69 states ( right ) . ] mass distributions for different @xmath74 regions measured by belle with fit projection assuming no @xmath69 state ( left ) and two @xmath69 states ( right ) . ]
the study of the decay @xmath1 is an interesting topic because it is very close to threshold .
while the @xmath0 mass measured by babar is significantly higher than the average mass measured in the @xmath31 mode , the latest belle measurement agrees with it within 2@xmath21 .
a detailed study of the exact line shape may reveal important information about the nature of the @xmath0 , but requires a much larger data sample .
the first observation of the decay @xmath36 and the measured high branching ratio with respect to the @xmath37 mode disfavor the hypothesis of a @xmath11 molecule .
the first observation of a charged charmonium - like state , the @xmath13 , was confirmed in a dalitz plot analysis by belle .
but so far this particle is not confirmed by any other experiment .
babar does not see a significant signal in the @xmath63 and @xmath48 mass spectra .
although statistical agreement with the belle data is established , the conclusions of both experiments differ .
two further charged states with even higher significance have been observed as @xmath85 resonances by belle .
a clear picture of the @xmath69 states with precise measurements of their properties may only arise at upgraded b - factories .
g. gokhroo _ et al . _ [ belle collaboration ] , phys .
lett . *
97 * , 162002 ( 2006 ) .
b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , phys .
011102 ( 2008 ) . i. adachi _ et al . _
[ belle collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0810.0358 .
c. hanhart , yu .
s. kalashnikova , a. e. kudryavtsev and a. v. nefediev , phys .
d * 76 * , 034007 ( 2007 ) .
k. abe _ et al . _ [ belle collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0505037 .
b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , phys .
d * 74 * , 071101 ( 2006 ) .
b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , phys .
lett . * 102 * , 132001 ( 2009 ) .
e. s. swanson , phys .
b * 598 * , 197 ( 2004 ) .
s. k. choi _ et al . _
[ belle collaboration ] , phys .
lett . * 100 * , 142001 ( 2008 ) .
b. aubert _ et al .
_ [ babar collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0811.0564 .
belle collaboration , kek preprint 2009 - 2 , + ` http://belle.kek.jp/belle/preprint/2009-9/z4430_dalitz_apr29.ps.gz ` | new states discovered @xcite at b - factories provide clean environment new particles in @xmath8 meson decays or @xmath9 reactions with radiation article recent analyses of new states in @xmath8 decays presented experiments babar and belle have sample 1.3 billion @xmath10 pairs oldest member charmonium - states @xmath0 discovered by belle in 2003 despite measurements at b - factories tevatron nature unknown fit conventional chamonium states mass close to @xmath11 threshold hypothesis of @xmath11 molecule considered explanation bound state of diquark and anti - diquark possible @xmath0 is @xmath12 state theoretical models fail to describe observation of @xmath13 received with interest not be conventional charmonium state decay @xmath15 with @xmath16 observed by belle in 2006 6.4 standard deviations confirmed by babar last year in @xmath17 decays @xmath18 babar sees excess near threshold 4.9@xmath21 fig template fit performed threshold effectswidth @xmath22 mev consistent with measurements mass @xmath23 mev agree with mass @xmath24 mev measurements @xmath25 mode question same particle observed in both modes or additional threshold effects belle updated analysis including @xmath26 @xcite combining @xmath27 modes signal significance 8.8@xmath21 observed fit with relativistic breit - wigner function mass - dependent resolution yields @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 mass closer to average in @xmath31 mode uncertainty due to line shape model remains alternative fit flatt function assumes mass below threshold @xcite data mass distribution measured by babar belle for @xmath26 @xmath32 evidence for decay @xmath15 with @xmath34 seen in 2005 by belle 4.0@xmath21 babar 3.4 babar updated analysis adding @xmath35 events @xmath36 decays @xcite signals significance 3.6@xmath21 3.5@xmath21 seen in @xmath37 @xmath38 modes @xmath8 decays to @xmath39 branching ratios of @xmath40 and @xmath41 measuredlimits three @xmath8 decay modes no significant signal quoted relative branching ratio of @xmath42 higher in @xmath11 molecule models left ) @xmath38 right mass distribution measured by babar four plots correspond @xmath8 decays channels @xmath43 left @xmath38 mass distribution measured babar four plots correspond @xmath8 decays channels @xmath43 2008 belle published resonance in @xmath48 invariant mass spectrum in @xmath49 decays significance 6.5@xmath21 @xcite events @xmath50 mass consistent with @xmath51 @xmath52 removed @xmath53 distribution fitted mass @xmath54 mev width @xmath55 mev branching ratio @xmath56 extracted babar detailed study of @xmath57 @xmath49 decays @xcite prominent features @xmath51 @xmath52 resonances understanding @xmath50 mass spectrum important babar with @xmath58- @xmath59- @xmath60-waves composition angular distributions components influence @xmath61 mass spectrum can not create narrow peaks in @xmath62 distributionbabar looks at @xmath63 @xmath48 mass distributions for events compares to projections @xmath50 components fig . no signal in @xmath65 spectra significant signal in @xmath53 spectra excess of 2.7@xmath21 in @xmath48 mass distribution at @xmath66 mev with @xmath67 mev values measured by belle 95% confidence limit on branching ratio @xmath68 comparison background subtracted @xmath53 distribution with belle shows good statistical agreement belle reanalyzed data with fit to dalitz plot @xmath50 resonances fit with @xmath69 resonance describes data better than without by 6.4@xmath21 variation fit model significance of 5.4@xmath21 updated measurements of @xmath70 properties are @xmath71 mev @xmath72 mev @xmath73 . @xmath48 mass distributions for regions measured by babar invariant @xmath48 mass distributions in different regions of @xmath74 measured by belle invariant regions of @xmath74 by bellefirst candidate charged exotic state observed @xmath48 resonance suggests search for similar charged states charmionia pions dalitz plot analysis @xmath76 events belle observes two new states @xmath77 and @xmath78 fig change in fit likelihood value significance of two-@xmath69-state versus no-@xmath69-state hypothesis 13.2@xmath21 determined systematic variations model significance 8.1@xmath21 compared one-@xmath69-state hypothesis two states favored by 5.7@xmath21 or 5.0@xmath21 systematics masses widths branching ratios of new states measured @xmath79 mev @xmath80 mev @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 mass distributions for @xmath74 regions measured by belle two @xmath74 regions study of decay @xmath1 close to threshold @xmath0 mass measured babar higher than average mass @xmath31 mode latest belle measurement agrees within 2@xmath21 detailed study exact line shape reveal information nature @xmath0 requires larger data samplefirst observation decay @xmath36 high branching ratio @xmath37 disfavor hypothesis @xmath11 molecule first observation charged charmonium - like state @xmath13 confirmed dalitz plot analysis belle particle not confirmed other experiment babar significant signal @xmath63 @xmath48 mass spectra statistical agreement belle data conclusions differ two charged states higher significance observed @xmath85 resonances by belle clear picture @xmath69 states precise measurements upgraded b - factories gokhroo belle collaboration phys . lett * 97 *, 162002 ( 2006 ) aubert babar collaboration phys . 011102 ( 2008 ) adachi belle collaboration arxiv hep - ex/0810.0358 hanhart kalashnikova kudryavtsev nefediev phys . d * 76 * 034007 ( 2007 ) abe belle collaboration hep - ex/0505037 aubert babar collaboration phys . 74 * 071101 ( 2006 ) 102 * 132001 ( 2009 ) swanson phys . 598, 197 ( 2004 ) choi belle collaboration phys . 100 * 142001 ( 2008 )aubert al collaboration arxiv hep - ex/0811.0564 belle collaboration kek preprint 2009.kek.jp-9/z4430_dalitz_apr29.ps | 0.42768 | 2,776 | 1,446 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,686 | let @xmath0 be a complete metric space , and let @xmath1 be a parametrised family of semigroups with global attractors @xmath2 .
we assume that there exists a fixed bounded set @xmath3 such that @xmath4 for every @xmath5 . by viewing the attractors as the limit as @xmath6 of the sets @xmath7 , we give simple proofs of the equivalence of ` equi - attraction ' to continuity ( when this convergence is uniform in @xmath8 ) and
show that the attractors @xmath2 are continuous in @xmath8 at a residual set of parameters in the sense of baire category ( when the convergence is only pointwise ) . | the global attractor of a dynamical system is the unique compact invariant set that attracts the trajectories starting in any bounded set at a uniform rate
. introduced by billotti & lasalle @xcite , they have been the subject of much research since the mid-1980s , and form the central topic of a number of monographs , including babin & vishik @xcite , hale @xcite , ladyzhenskaya @xcite , robinson @xcite , and temam @xcite .
the standard theory incorporates existence results @xcite , upper semicontinuity @xcite , and bounds on the attractor dimension @xcite .
global attractors exist for many infinite - dimensional models @xcite , with familiar low - dimensional ode models such as the lorenz equations providing a testing ground for the general theory @xcite .
while upper semicontinuity with respect to perturbations is easy to prove , lower semicontinuity ( and hence full continuity ) is more delicate , requiring structural assumptions on the attractor or the assumption of a uniform attraction rate .
however , babin & pilyugin @xcite proved that the global attractor of a parametrised set of semigroups is continuous at a residual set of parameters , by taking advantage of the known upper semicontinuity and then using the fact that upper semicontinuous functions are continuous on a residual set . here
we reprove results on equi - attraction and residual continuity in a more direct way , which also serves to demonstrate more clearly why these results are true .
given equi - attraction the attractor is the uniform limit of a sequence of continuous functions , and hence continuous ( the converse requires a generalised version of dini s theorem ) ; more generally , it is the pointwise limit of a sequence of continuous functions , i.e. a ` baire one ' function , and therefore the set of continuity points forms a residual set .
a semigroup @xmath9 on a complete metric space @xmath10 is a collection of maps @xmath11 such that * @xmath12 ; * @xmath13 for all @xmath14 ; and * @xmath15 is continuous in @xmath16 and @xmath17 .
a compact set @xmath18 is the _ global attractor _ for @xmath19 if * @xmath20 for all @xmath21 ; and * for any bounded set @xmath22 , @xmath23 as @xmath6 , where @xmath24 is the semi - distance @xmath25 .
when such a set exists it is unique , the maximal compact invariant set , and the minimal closed set that satisfies ( a2 ) .
let @xmath0 be a complete metric space and @xmath26 a parametrised family of semigroups on @xmath27 .
suppose that * @xmath26 has a global attractor @xmath2 for every @xmath5 ; * there is a bounded subset @xmath3 of @xmath27 such that @xmath4 for every @xmath5 ; and * for @xmath28 , @xmath29 is continuous in @xmath8 , uniformly for @xmath16 in bounded subsets of @xmath27 .
we can strengthen ( l2 ) and weaken ( l3 ) by replacing ` bounded ' by ` compact ' to yield conditions ( l2@xmath30 ) and ( l3@xmath30 ) .
a wide range of dissipative systems with parameters satisfy these assumptions , for example the 2d navier stokes equations , the scalar kuramoto
sivashinsky equation , reaction - diffusion equations , and the lorenz equations , all of which are covered in @xcite . under these mild assumptions
it is easy to show that @xmath2 is upper semicontinuous , @xmath31 see @xcite , for example .
however , lower semicontinuity , that is @xmath32 requires more : either structural conditions on the attractor @xmath33 ( @xmath33 is the closure of the unstable manifolds of a finite number of hyperbolic equilibria , see hale & raugel @xcite , stuart & humphries @xcite , or robinson @xcite ) or the ` equi - attraction ' hypothesis of li & kloeden @xcite ( see section [ ea ] ) . as a result ,
the continuity of attractors , @xmath34 where @xmath35 is the symmetric hausdorff distance , is only known under restrictive conditions . in this paper
we view @xmath2 as a function from @xmath0 into the space of closed bounded subsets of @xmath27 , given as the limit of the continuous functions @xmath36 ( see lemma [ dncts ] ) .
indeed , note that given any set @xmath37 it follows from the invariance of the attractor ( a1 ) that @xmath38 and so the the attraction property of the attractor in ( a2 ) implies that @xmath39 uniform convergence ( with respect to @xmath8 ) in ( [ limit ] ) is essentially the ` equi - attraction ' introduced in @xcite , and thus clearly related to continuity of the limiting function @xmath2 ( section [ ea ] ) . given only pointwise ( @xmath8-by-@xmath8 ) convergence in ( [ limit ] ) we can still use the result from the theory of baire category that the pointwise limit of continuous functions ( a ` baire one function ' ) is continuous at a residual set to guarantee that @xmath2 is continuous in @xmath8 on a residual subset of @xmath0 ( section [ bc ] ) . for both results
the following simple lemma is fundamental .
we let @xmath40 be the collection of all closed and bounded subsets of @xmath27 , and use the symmetric hausdorff distance @xmath41 defined in ( [ shd ] ) as the metric on this space .
[ dncts ] suppose that @xmath3 is bounded and that ( l3 ) holds .
then for any @xmath28 the map @xmath42 is continuous from @xmath0 into @xmath40 .
the same is true if @xmath3 is compact and ( l3@xmath30 ) holds . given @xmath28 , @xmath43 , and @xmath44 , ( l3 ) ensures that there exists a @xmath45 such that @xmath46 implies that @xmath47 for every @xmath48 .
it follows that @xmath49 and so @xmath50 from which @xmath51 as required .
first we give a simple proof of the results in @xcite on the equivalence between equi - attraction and continuity . in our framework these follow from two classical results : the continuity of the uniform limit of a sequence of continuous functions and dini s theorem in an abstract formulation .
li & kloeden require ( l1 ) , ( l2 ) , a time - uniform version of ( l3 ) ( see corollary [ cor ] ) , and in addition an ` equi - dissipative ' assumption that there exists a bounded absorbing set @xmath52 such that @xmath53 where @xmath54 does not depend on @xmath8 .
they then show that when @xmath0 is compact , continuity of @xmath2 in @xmath8 is equivalent to equi - attraction , @xmath55 we now give our version of dini s theorem . [ dini ] for each @xmath56 let @xmath57 be a continuous map , where @xmath52 is a compact metric space and @xmath58 is any metric space .
if @xmath59 is continuous and is the monotonic pointwise limit of @xmath60 , i.e. for every @xmath61 @xmath62 then @xmath60 converges uniformly to @xmath59 .
given @xmath44 define @xmath63 since @xmath60 and @xmath59 are both continuous , @xmath64 is open and non - decreasing .
since @xmath52 is compact and @xmath65 provides an open cover of @xmath52 , there exists an @xmath66 such that @xmath67 , and so @xmath68 for all @xmath61 for all @xmath69 .
our first result relates continuity to a slightly weakened form of equi - attraction through sequences .
we remark that our proof allows us to dispense with the ` equi - dissipative ' assumption ( [ equid ] ) of @xcite .
[ cty ] assume ( l1 ) and ( l23 ) or ( l2@xmath303@xmath30 ) . if there exist @xmath70 such that @xmath71 then @xmath2 is continuous in @xmath8 for all @xmath5 .
conversely , if @xmath0 is compact then continuity of @xmath2 for all @xmath5 implies that there exist @xmath70 such that ( [ unif ] ) holds .
lemma [ dncts ] guarantees that @xmath72 is continuous for each @xmath73 , and we have already observed in ( [ limit ] ) that @xmath74 therefore @xmath2 is the uniform limit of the continuous functions @xmath36 and so is continuous itself . for the converse ,
let @xmath75 . for each @xmath43
it follows from ( a2 ) and ( l2 ) that there exists a time @xmath76 such that @xmath77 for all @xmath78 .
it follows from ( l3 ) that there exists an @xmath79 such that @xmath80 for every @xmath8 with @xmath81 . since @xmath0 is compact @xmath82 for some @xmath83 and @xmath84 .
if @xmath85 then @xmath86 since any @xmath5 is contained in @xmath87 for some @xmath88 , and @xmath89 for some @xmath90 , from which ( [ second ] ) follows by applying @xmath91 repeatedly ( @xmath92 times ) to both sides of ( [ first ] ) .
it follows from ( [ second ] ) that for every @xmath5 , @xmath93 is a decreasing sequence of sets , and hence the convergence of @xmath93 to @xmath2 , ensured by ( [ limit ] ) , is in fact monotonic in the sense of our theorem [ dini ] .
uniform convergence now follows , and finally the fact that @xmath94 yields @xmath95 uniformly in @xmath8 as @xmath96 . with additional uniform continuity assumptions
we can readily show that continuity implies equi - attraction in the sense of @xcite .
we give one version of this result .
[ cor ] suppose that ( l13 ) hold and that @xmath0 is compact .
assume in addition that @xmath29 is continuous in @xmath16 , uniformly in @xmath8 and for @xmath16 in bounded subsets of @xmath27 and @xmath97 $ ] for any @xmath98
. then continuity of @xmath2 implies ( [ unifkl ] ) .
since @xmath4 and @xmath2 is invariant , given any @xmath44 , by assumption there exists a @xmath45 such that @xmath99 any @xmath100 , for all @xmath5 and @xmath101 .
choose @xmath102 sufficiently large that @xmath103 now for any @xmath104 , @xmath105 , we can write @xmath106 for some @xmath101 , and it follows from ( [ morecty ] ) that @xmath107 with the convergence uniform in @xmath8 as required .
when the rate of attraction to @xmath2 is not uniform in @xmath8 we nevertheless have the convergence in ( [ limit ] ) for each @xmath8 . in general , therefore , one can view the attractor as the ` pointwise ' ( @xmath8-by-@xmath8 ) limit of the sequence of continuous functions @xmath108 . in the case of a sequence of continuous real functions ,
their pointwise limit is a ` baire one function ' , and is continuous on a residual set .
the same ideas in a more abstract setting yield continuity of @xmath2 on a residual subset of @xmath0 .
we use the following abstract result , characterising the continuity of ` baire one ' functions , whose proof ( which we include for completeness ) is an easy variant of that given by oxtoby @xcite . a result in the same general setting as here can be found as theorem 48.5 in munkres @xcite . recall that a set is _ nowhere dense _ if its closure contains no open sets , and a set is _ residual _ if its complement is the countable union of nowhere dense sets .
any residual set is dense .
[ bct ] for each @xmath56 let @xmath109 be a continuous map , where @xmath0 is a complete metric space and @xmath58 is any metric space .
if @xmath59 is the pointwise limit of @xmath60 , i.e. @xmath110 for each @xmath5 ( and the limit exists ) , then the points of continuity of @xmath59 form a residual subset of @xmath0 . before the proof we make the following observation : if @xmath111 and @xmath112 are open subsets of @xmath0 with @xmath113 , then @xmath114 .
otherwise @xmath115 , the complement of @xmath112 in @xmath0 , is a closed set containing @xmath111 , and since @xmath116 is the intersection of all closed sets that contain @xmath111 , @xmath117 , a contradiction . to show that @xmath120 is nowhere dense , i.e. that its closure contains no open set , let @xmath121 note that @xmath64 is closed , @xmath122 , and @xmath123 .
choose any open set @xmath124 , and consider @xmath125 .
since @xmath116 is a complete metric space , it follows from the baire category theorem that there exists an @xmath73 such that @xmath126 contains an open set @xmath127 . from the remark before the proof
, @xmath128 is an open subset of @xmath126 that is in addition a subset of @xmath111 . since @xmath129
, it follows that @xmath130 for all @xmath131 and @xmath132 .
fixing @xmath133 and letting @xmath134 it follows that @xmath135 now , since @xmath136 is continuous in @xmath8 , for any @xmath137 there is a neighbourhood @xmath138 such that @xmath139 thus by the triangle inequality @xmath140 it follows that no element of @xmath141 belongs to @xmath120 , which implies , since @xmath142 that @xmath111 contains an open set that is not contained in @xmath120 .
this shows that @xmath120 is nowhere dense , which concludes the proof .
[ main ] under assumptions ( l13 ) above or ( l1 ) , ( l2@xmath30 ) , and ( l3@xmath30 )
@xmath2 is continuous in @xmath8 for all @xmath143 in a residual subset of @xmath0 .
in particular the set of continuity points of @xmath2 is dense in @xmath0 .
we showed in lemma [ dncts ] that for every @xmath28 the map @xmath144 is continuous from @xmath0 into @xmath145 , and observed in ( [ limit ] ) the pointwise convergence @xmath146 the result follows immediately from theorem [ bct ] , setting @xmath147 and @xmath148 for every @xmath5 .
residual continuity results also hold for the pullback attractors @xcite and uniform attractors @xcite that occur in non - autonomous systems .
we will discuss these results in the context of the two - dimensional navier
stokes equations in a future paper . | global attractor of dynamical system is unique compact invariant set attracts trajectories bounded set at uniform rate introduced by billotti & lasalle subject of research since mid-1980s central topic of monographs including babin & vishik hale ladyzhenskaya robinson temam standard theory incorporates existence results upper semicontinuity bounds on attractor dimension global attractors exist for infinite - models low - dimensional models lorenz equations testing ground for general theory upper semicontinuity perturbations easy to prove lower semicontinuity full continuity delicate structural assumptions or uniform attraction rate babin & pilyugin proved global attractor of parametrised set semigroups continuous at residual set of parameters by upper semicontinuity upper semicontinuous functions continuous on residual set results on equi - attraction and residual continuity why results true given equi - attraction attractor is uniform limit of sequence of continuous functions pointwise limit of sequence of continuous functions set of continuity points forms residual setsemigroup @xmath9 complete metric space @xmath10 collection maps @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 continuous @xmath16 compact set @xmath18 global attractor @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 bounded set @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath6 @xmath24 semi - distance @xmath25 set unique maximal compact invariant set minimal closed set a2 ) @xmath0 complete metric space @xmath26 parametrised family semigroups @xmath27 @xmath26 global attractor @xmath2 @xmath5 bounded subset @xmath3 @xmath27 @xmath4 every @xmath5 @xmath28 @xmath29 continuous @xmath8 @xmath16 bounded subsets @xmath27 strengthen weaken l3 bounded compact conditions@xmath30@xmath30 dissipative systems parameters satisfy assumptions 2d navier stokes equations scalar kuramoto sivashinsky equation reaction - diffusion equations lorenz equations covered @xcite show @xmath2 upper semicontinuous @xmath31 @xcitelower semicontinuity @xmath32 requires more structural conditions on attractor @xmath33 closure of unstable manifolds finite hyperbolic equilibria or equi - attraction hypothesis of li & kloeden @xcite continuity of attractors @xmath34 @xmath35 symmetric hausdorff distance known under restrictive conditions @xmath2 as function from @xmath0 into closed bounded subsets of @xmath27 limit of continuous functions @xmath36 set @xmath37 follows from invariance attractor a1 @xmath38 attraction property implies @xmath39 uniform convergence @xmath8 limit is ` equi - attraction ' introduced in @xcite related to continuity of limiting function @xmath2 pointwise @xmath8-by-@xmath8 convergence in [ limit ] ) use result from theory of baire pointwise limit of continuous functions continuous at residual set to guarantee @xmath2 continuous in @xmath8 on residual subset of @xmath0 for lemma fundamental @xmath40 be collection of all closed bounded subsets of @xmath27 use symmetric hausdorff distance @xmath41 defined as metric on space@xmath3 bounded ( l3 ) holds @xmath28 map @xmath42 continuous from @xmath0 into @xmath40 same if @xmath3 compact@xmath30 ) holds @xmath28 ( l3 ) ensures @xmath45 @xmath46 implies @xmath47 @xmath48 follows @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 required proof results equivalence equi - attraction continuity follow continuity uniform limit continuous functions dini s theorem require ( l1 ) l2 ) time - uniform version ( l3 ) equi - dissipative assumption bounded absorbing set @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 depend on @xmath8 @xmath0 compact continuity @xmath2 @xmath8 equivalent to equi - attraction @xmath55 version dini s theorem @xmath56 @xmath57 continuous map @xmath52 compact metric space @xmath58 any metric space @xmath59 continuous monotonic pointwise limit @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath60 converges uniformly to @xmath59 @xmath44 define @xmath63 continuous @xmath64 open non - decreasing@xmath52 compact @xmath65 open cover @xmath52 exists @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath61 @xmath69 first result relates continuity to weakened equi - attraction through sequences proof dispense with equi - dissipative assumption @xcite assume ( l1 ) l23 ) l2@xmath303@xmath30 ) @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath2 continuous in @xmath8 for @xmath5 @xmath0 compact continuity @xmath2 for @xmath5 implies @xmath70 holds lemma guarantees @xmath72 continuous for each @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath2 uniform limit of continuous functions @xmath36 continuous converse @xmath75 each @xmath43 time @xmath76 @xmath77 for @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 for every @xmath8 with @xmath81 @xmath0 compact @xmath82 for some @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath5 contained in @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 applying @xmath91 repeatedly @xmath92 times to both sides first follows @xmath5 @xmath93 decreasing sequence sets convergence @xmath93 to @xmath2 ensured by limit monotonic theorem uniform convergence follows @xmath94 yields @xmath95 uniformly in @xmath8 @xmath96 additional uniform continuity assumptions continuity implies equi - attraction one version result suppose l13 hold @xmath0 compact @xmath29 continuous in @xmath16 uniformly in @xmath8 @xmath16 subsets @xmath27 @xmath97 @xmath98 continuity of @xmath2 implies unifkl ] ) @xmath4 and @xmath2 invariant @xmath44 exists @xmath45 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath5 @xmath101 choose @xmath102 large @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105 write @xmath106 for @xmath101 @xmath107 convergence uniform in @xmath8 rate attraction to @xmath2 not uniform in @xmath8 convergence in limit for each @xmath8 view attractor as pointwise @xmath8-by-@xmath8 limit of sequence continuous functions @xmath108 continuous functions pointwise limit is ` baire one function continuous on residual set yield continuity of @xmath2 on residual subset @xmath0 abstract result continuity baire one ' functions variant oxtoby @xcite result theorem 48.5 in munkres @xcite set nowhere dense if closure no open sets residual if complement union nowhere dense sets residual set dense @xmath56 @xmath109 continuous map @xmath0 complete metric space @xmath58 any metric space if @xmath59 is pointwise limit of @xmath60 @xmath110 for each @xmath5 points of continuity of @xmath59 form residual subset of @xmath0 if @xmath111 and @xmath112 open subsets of @xmath0 with @xmath113 then @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath112 closed set containing @xmath111 @xmath116 intersection of all closed sets contradiction @xmath120 nowhere dense closure contains no open set @xmath121 note @xmath64 closed @xmath122 @xmath123 choose open set @xmath124 consider @xmath125@xmath116 complete metric space baire category theorem @xmath73 @xmath126 contains open set @xmath127 @xmath128 open subset @xmath126 subset @xmath111 @xmath129 follows @xmath130 @xmath131 @xmath132 fixing @xmath133 @xmath134 follows @xmath135 @xmath136 continuous in @xmath8 @xmath137 neighbourhood @xmath138 @xmath139 triangle inequality @xmath140 no element @xmath141 belongs @xmath120 implies @xmath142 @xmath111 contains open set not @xmath120 @xmath120 nowhere dense concludes proof assumptions ( l13 ) @xmath2 continuous in @xmath8 @xmath143 residual subset @xmath0 set continuity points @xmath2 dense in @xmath0 @xmath28 map @xmath144 continuous from @xmath0 into @xmath145 pointwise convergence @xmath146 result follows theorem setting @xmath147 @xmath148 @xmath5 residual continuity results hold pullback attractors @xcite uniform attractors non - autonomous systems discuss results two - dimensional navier stokes equations future paper | 0.505483 | 3,503 | 1,917 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,687 | we show that two qubits initially in completely classical state can create quantum discord through a local generalized amplitude damping channel , but high temperature will impede the creating of quantum discord . | quantum entanglement is one of the most striking features of quantum physics .
it remarkably reveals nonlocality and may lead to powerful applications in quantum information and quantum computation @xcite .
but entanglement is incredibly fragile under environmental noises , and any local operations can not increase it .
these are serious frustrations for using entanglement .
quantum discord @xcite is another quantum correlation other than entanglement , and also can be used for quantum computation @xcite .
it has been shown that quantum discord is more robust than entanglement @xcite .
furthermore , recent studies @xcite indicate that local environmental noises can create quantum discord .
these are exciting results compared to the case of entanglement .
in @xcite , f. ciccarello and v. giovannetti showed that a zero discord state of two qubits @xmath0 can create quantum discord under an amplitude damping channel , where @xmath1 where @xmath2,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the noise is the generalized amplitude damping channel .
we know generalized amplitude damping describes temperature effects , so we are especially interested in the temperature effect on the quantum discord .
this paper is organized as follows . in sec .
2 , we briefly recall some basics about quantum discord and generalized amplitude damping as preparations . in sec . 3
, we investigate the quantum discord of two qubits whose intial state as in eq.(3 ) and undergoes a local generalized amplitude damping .
4 is a brief summary .
suppose two quantum systems a and b are described by the hilbert spaces @xmath3 and @xmath4 , respectively .
the composite system ab is then described by the hilbert space @xmath5 @xmath4 . for a state @xmath6 on @xmath5 @xmath4 ,
the quantum discord ( with respect to a ) of @xmath6 is defined as @xcite @xmath7 where @xmath8 , @xmath9 , inf takes all projective measurements @xmath10 on system a , @xmath11 is the von neumann entropy .
it can be proven that @xcite @xmath12 where @xmath13 is an orthonormal basis for @xmath3 , @xmath14 are density operators on @xmath4 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 .
eq.(5 ) is hard to optimize , even for two qubits case till now only few states are found possessing analytical expressions @xcite .
b. dakic , v. vedral and c. brukner proposed a geometric measure of quantum discord as @xcite @xmath17:d_a(\sigma ) = 0\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] evidently , @xmath18 as an elegant result , @xmath19 allows analytical expressions for all two qubits states @xcite . more specifically , for a two qubits state @xmath20 where , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 are pauli matrices , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 are all real numbers with @xmath27,y_j = tr[\rho i\otimes \sigma _ j],t_{ij}=tr[\rho \sigma _ i\otimes \sigma _ j],\end{aligned}\ ] ] then @xcite @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the largest eigenvalue of the matrix @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 is the matrix @xmath33 . generalized amplitude damping describes the effect of dissipation to an environment at finite temperature ( @xcite , 8.3.5 ) .
suppose two qubits systems a and b , given the bases @xmath34 , @xmath34 for @xmath3 and @xmath4 , the operation elements for generalized amplitude damping are @xmath35 where @xmath36 $ ] , @xmath37 $ ] .
@xmath38 and @xmath39 are functions of temperature @xmath32 .
@xmath40 describes the transition probability between @xmath41 and @xmath42 at temperature @xmath32 .
@xmath43 describes temperature effects , @xmath44 is the case of amplitude damping .
we can assume that ( see for example @xcite ) @xmath43 is a monotonically decreasing function when t varies from 0 to @xmath45 , and @xmath46 from eq.(12 ) we can see that p varies from 0 to 0.5 is symmetric to that p varies from 1 to 0.5 in the sense exchanging states @xmath47 and @xmath48 , so we only need to consider the case p varies from 1 to 0.5 . a state @xmath6 after this generalized amplitude damping will be a state @xmath49
now suppose two qubits initially is in the state as in eq.(3 ) , through the generalized amplitude damping channel in eq.(12 ) , the output state @xmath50 can be calculated directly by eqs.(3,12,14 ) , will be @xmath51 where @xmath52 we first ask , for what initial states and what generalized amplitude damping channel , the quantum discord of the output states , @xmath53 , are vanishing ? this is the proposition 1 below .
_ proposition 1 .
_ the quantum discord @xmath53 of the state @xmath6 in eq.(15 ) is zero if one of the conditions below is satisfied ( i ) .
@xmath54 ( ii ) .
@xmath55 ( iii ) .
@xmath56 ( iv ) .
@xmath57 ( v ) . @xmath58 _ proof . _ from eq.(8 ) , we only need to prove @xmath59 using eq.(11 ) to eq.(15 ) , after some calculations , we get @xmath60[(x_3-t_{13})^2+t_{33}^2]}\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] from eq.(16 ) , it is easy to see that ( vi ) .
if @xmath61 , then @xmath62 ( vii ) .
if @xmath63 , then @xmath64 ( viii ) . if @xmath65 , then @xmath66 ( ix )
if @xmath67 , then @xmath66 ( x ) . if @xmath68 , then @xmath69 .
each of the cases above can result in @xmath70 .
we then complete this proof .
we next investigate the quantum discord @xmath53 for the state @xmath6 in eq.(15 ) for more general cases , that is @xmath71 , @xmath72 , @xmath73 $ ] .
any orthonormal basis of @xmath3 can be expressed as an unitary matrix @xmath74 multiplied by the orthonormal basis @xmath34 .
since @xmath74 can be written as @xmath75 where @xmath76 are all real numbers and satisfy @xmath77 then any orthonormal basis of @xmath3 can be expressed as @xmath78 denote @xmath79 and @xmath80 , then from eqs.(15,20,21 ) , we have @xmath81+\frac{\sigma _ z } 4[2(tb+ac)t_{13}+(t^2+c^2-a^2-b^2)t_{33 } ] , \\
\fl p_0=tr\langle \varphi _ 0|\rho |\varphi _ 0\rangle = \frac 12(1+x_3)-(a^2+b^2)x_3 , \\ \fl p_1\rho _ 1=\frac i4[1+(a^2+b^2-t^2-c^2)x_3]+\frac{\sigma _ z } 4[-2(tb+ac)t_{13}+(a^2+b^2-t^2-c^2)t_{33 } ] , \\ \fl p_1=tr\langle \varphi _ 1|\rho |\varphi _
1\rangle = \frac 12(1-x_3)+(a^2+b^2)x_3.\end{aligned}\ ] ] let @xmath82 then @xmath83 where @xmath84 , \ \ \ \theta _ 1\in [ 0,2\pi ) , \ \ \ \theta _ 2\in [ 0,2\pi ) , \ \ \ \theta _ 3=\theta _ 1+\theta _ 2.\end{aligned}\ ] ] eqs.(22 - 25 ) then read @xmath85+\frac{\sigma _
z}4[2\sqrt{r(1-r)}\sin \theta _ 3t_{13}+(1 - 2r)t_{33 } ] , \\ \fl \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
p_0=\frac 12[1+(1 - 2r)x_3 ] , \\ \fl \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ p_1\rho _ 1=\frac i4[1-(1 - 2r)x_3]+\frac{\sigma _
z}4[-2\sqrt{r(1-r)}\sin \theta _ 3t_{13}-(1 - 2r)t_{33 } ] , \\ \fl \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
p_1=\frac 12[1-(1 - 2r)x_3].\end{aligned}\ ] ] let @xmath86 then eqs.(29 - 32 ) become @xmath87+\frac{\sigma _
z}4[\beta t_{13}+\alpha t_{33 } ] , \\
p_0=\frac 12[1+\alpha x_3 ] , \\ p_1\rho
_ 1=\frac i4[1-\alpha x_3]+\frac{\sigma
_ z}4[-\beta t_{13}-\alpha t_{33 } ] , \\
p_1=\frac 12[1-\alpha x_3],\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath88 from eqs.(34 - 37 ) , it is easy to find that @xmath89 has two eigenvalues @xmath90 and @xmath91 has two eigenvalues @xmath92 thus @xmath93 where @xmath94 is the binary entropy @xmath95 @xmath96 is defined on @xmath97,$ ] @xmath96 is a concave function , and @xmath98 we say @xmath99 is a concave function in @xmath100 , this can be seen from the concavity of @xmath96 and the facts below : ( xi ) .
if @xmath101 and @xmath102 are convex functions , then so is @xmath103 ( @xcite , 3.2.1 ) ; ( xii ) .
convexity is invariant under affine maps : that is , if f(x ) is convex with @xmath104 , then so is @xmath105 with @xmath106 , @xmath107 , @xmath108 an @xmath109 real matrix ( @xcite , 3.2.2 ) ; ( xiii ) . if f(x ) is convex , then so is @xmath110 with @xmath111 ( @xcite , 3.2.6 ) .
it follows that the minimum of @xmath99 in eq.(41 ) over the domain @xmath112 can be achieved on the unit circle @xmath113 further , from eq.(41 ) , it is evident that @xmath114 hence , @xmath115=\min \{f(\theta ) : 0\leq \theta
\leq \pi \},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath116 finally , we get the expression of @xmath117 as @xmath118 where @xmath119 and @xmath120 can be calculated directly by eq.(15 ) as @xmath121 from these expressions , we have proposition 2 below .
_ proposition 2 .
_ quantum discord @xmath53 in eq.(46 ) for the state @xmath6 in eq.(15 ) has the same value for @xmath122 and @xmath123 , that is , @xmath53 is symmetric about @xmath124 . _
_ from eq.(16 ) , if @xmath122 generates @xmath125 , then @xmath123 generates @xmath126 .
@xmath125 and @xmath126 generate the same value for @xmath127 , see eqs.(47 - 48 ) . also , in @xmath128 of eq.(45 )
, by use of @xmath129 , we can get @xmath130 thus , we can readily attain proposition 2 and end this proof .
and @xmath131 when @xmath132.,title="fig:",width=264 ] and @xmath131 when @xmath132.,title="fig:",width=264 ] fig.1 depicts @xmath53 as a function of @xmath133 at @xmath134 , @xmath135 , @xmath136 , @xmath137 , respectively . from fig.1
we see that , when @xmath138 is close to @xmath124 and @xmath139 close to 1 , @xmath53 is relatively large .
that is to say , more superposition of the states @xmath41 and @xmath42 in eq.(3 ) can boost the creating of quantum discord , while high temperature , conversely , can impede the creating .
fig.2 shows @xmath53 as a function of @xmath140 at @xmath124 .
we investigated the quantum discord of two qubits which initially in completely classical state then experienced a local generalized amplitude damping channel .
we showed that a completely classical state can create quantum discord through a local generalized amplitude damping , while high temperature will impede the creating of quantum discord .
this work was supported by national natural science foundation of china ( grant nos .
10775101 ) .
the author thanks qing hou for helpful discussions . | quantum entanglement striking quantum physics reveals nonlocality applications in quantum information computation fragile under environmental noises local operations increase frustrations for entanglement quantum discord @xcite correlation used for quantum computation discord more robust than entanglement studies local environmental noises create quantum discord f. ciccarello v. giovannetti zero discord state of two qubits @xmath0 create quantum discord under amplitude damping channel noise generalized amplitude damping channel amplitude damping describes temperature effects interested in temperature effect on quantum discord paper organized 2 recall basics about quantum discord generalized amplitude damping 3 investigate quantum discord of two qubits intial state local generalized amplitude damping two quantum systems a and b described by hilbert spaces @xmath3 @xmath4 composite system ab described by hilbert space @xmath5 @xmath4 state @xmath6 on @xmath5 @xmath4 quantum discord of @xmath6 defined as @xcite @xmath7 where @xmath8 takes projective measurements @xmath10 on system a @xmath11 is von neumann entropyproven @xcite @xmath12 @xmath13 orthonormal basis @xmath3 @xmath14 density operators @xmath4 eq.(5 ) hard optimize two qubits few states analytical expressions @xcite b. dakic v. vedral c. brukner proposed geometric measure quantum discord @xcite @xmath17:d_a(\sigma ) = 0{aligned @xmath18 result @xmath19 allows expressions two qubits states two qubits state @xmath20 pauli matrices real numbers @xmath27,y_j = tr\sigma j,t_{ij}=tr{aligned @xcite @xmath28 @xmath29 largest eigenvalue matrix @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 matrix @xmath33 generalized amplitude damping describes effect dissipation environment finite temperature two qubits systems a b bases @xmath34 @xmath3 @xmath4 operation elements amplitude damping @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 functions temperature @xmath32 @xmath40 transition probability @xmath41 @xmath42 temperature @xmath32@xmath43 temperature effects @xmath44 amplitude damping assume @xmath43 monotonically decreasing function when t varies 0 to @xmath45 @xmath46 eq.(12 ) p varies 0 to 0.5 symmetric to p 1 to 0.5 exchanging states @xmath47 and @xmath48 consider case p varies 1 to 0.5 state @xmath6 after amplitude damping state @xmath49 two qubits eq.(3 ) amplitude damping channel eq.(12 ) output state @xmath50 calculated by eqs.(3,12,14 ) @xmath51 @xmath52 initial states generalized amplitude damping channel quantum discord of output states @xmath53 vanishing proposition 1 quantum discord @xmath53 of state @xmath6 in eq.(15 ) zero if conditions satisfied @xmath54 @xmath57 @xmath58 proof eq.(8 prove @xmath59 using eq.(11 ) to eq.(15 ) calculations @xmath60[(x_3-t_{13})^2+t_{33}^2] from eq.(16 ) if @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64@xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath66 x ) @xmath68 @xmath69 result @xmath70 complete proof investigate quantum discord @xmath53 @xmath6 eq.(15 ) general cases @xmath71 orthonormal basis @xmath3 unitary matrix @xmath74 multiplied @xmath34 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 real numbers satisfy @xmath77 basis @xmath3 @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 eqs.(15,20,21 ) @xmath81+\frac{\sigma z } 4[2(tb+ac)t_{13}+(t^2+c^2-a^2-b^2)t_{33 }\langle \frac 12(1+x_3)-(a^2+b^2)x_3\frac i4[1+(a^2+b^2-t^2-c^2)x_3]+\frac{\sigma z 4[-2(tb+ac)t_{13}+(a^2+b^2-t^2-c^2)t_{33 } \frac 12(1-x_3)+(a^2+b^2)x_3{aligned @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84\theta 1 0,2\pi 2 0,2\pi 3= 1+ eqs.(22 - 25 ) @xmath85+\frac\sigma z}4[2 \theta 3t_{13}+(1 - 2r)t_{33 p_0=\frac 12[1+(1 - 2r)x_3 1=\frac i4[1-(1 - 2r)x_3]+\frac\sigma z}4\theta 3t_{13}-(1 - 2r)t_{33 p_1=\frac 12[1-(1 - 2r)x_3] @xmath86 eqs.(29 - 32 @xmath87+\frac\sigma z}4 t{13}+\alpha t_{33 p_0=\frac 12[1+\alpha x_3 p_1 1=\frac i4[1-\alpha x_3]+\frac\sigma z}4[- t{13-\alpha t_{33 p_1=\frac 12[1-\alpha x_3] @xmath88 eqs.(34 - 37 ) @xmath89 two eigenvalues @xmath90 @xmath91 eigenvalues @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 binary entropy @xmath95 @xmath96 defined on @xmath97 @xmath96 concave function @xmath98 @xmath99 concave function @xmath100 concavity @xmath96 facts @xmath101 @xmath102 convex @xmath103 convexity invariant under affine maps f(x ) convex with @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 f(x ) convex @xmath110 @xmath111 minimum of @xmath99 in eq.(41 ) over domain @xmath112 achieved on unit circle @xmath113 eq.(41 ) @xmath114 @xmath115=\min \{f(\theta ) : 0\leq \theta \leq \pi \end{aligned} @xmath116 expression @xmath117 as @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 calculated by eq.(15 ) as @xmath121 proposition 2 quantum discord @xmath53 in eq.(46 ) state @xmath6 in eq.(15 ) same value @xmath122 @xmath123 @xmath53 symmetric about @xmath124 eq.(16 ) @xmath122 generates @xmath125 @xmath123 generates @xmath126 @xmath125 @xmath126 generate same value @xmath127 see eqs.(47 - 48 ) @xmath128 eq.(45 ) use @xmath129 get @xmath130 attain proposition 2 end proof @xmath131 @xmath132 fig.1 @xmath53 function of @xmath133 at @xmath134 @xmath138 close to @xmath124 @xmath139 close 1 @xmath53 large more superposition states @xmath41 @xmath42 eq.(3 ) boost quantum discord high temperature creating fig.2 shows @xmath53 function of @xmath140 at @xmath124 investigated quantum discord two qubits classical damping classical state create quantum discord high temperature creating discord work supported by national natural science foundation china grant nos . 10775101 ) author thanks qing hou discussions | 0.434507 | 3,059 | 1,666 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,691 | the human society today is far from perfection and conflicts between groups of humans are frequent events .
one example for such conflicts are armed intergroup conflicts .
the collective behavior of the large number of cooperating participants in these conflicts allows us to describe the conflict on the basis of models containing only few variables . in this paper
we discuss several cases of conflicts without use of weapons of non - conventional kind . in the ancient times
the chinese writer sun tsu mentioned that the war is an art .
we can confirm that the conflict is an art but with much mathematics at the background . *
key words * : conflict , attrition , ambush , combat , mathematical models | today we are excited by the fast advance of the physics and applied mathematics in the area of research of complex systems in nature and society [ 1 - 8 ] .
an important part of the ground for this success was created more than 60 years ago when l. f. richardson and l. w. lanchester , both famous british scientists , were the first who rose and applied the idea for mathematical modeling of arms races and military combats [ 9 - 12 ] . for many years
the research on wars and other military conflicts was concentrated in the military universities and academies . in the last 20 years and especially after the terrorist attack on 11th of september 2001 this research became actual for many physicists and applied mathematicians too [ 13 - 15 ] . in this paper
we shall follow the terminology used by epstein @xcite who applied ecological models of lotka - volterra kind for description of combats .
let us have two conflicting groups named the `` red group '' @xmath0 and the `` blue group '' @xmath1 .
a general form of model equations of an armed conflict between these groups is @xmath2 where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are the numbers of armed members of the two groups ; @xmath5 and @xmath6 are the `` firing efectivenes '' ( technology level ) of the groups ; and @xmath7 and @xmath8 are linear or nonlinear functions , depending on the character of the conflict .
epstein @xcite proposed the following class of models of the conflict @xmath9 where @xmath10 are real nonnegative coefficients .
if these coefficients are constants the models are called hard models .
if the coefficients depend on the the number of participants or on the parameters of the environment the models are called soft ones .
important characteristics of the model ( [ epst1 ] ) is the casuality exchange ratio or state equation ( the ratio of eliminated members of the `` red '' and `` blue '' groups ) . for ( [ epst1 ] )
the ratio is @xmath11 where @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
the integral form of the above casuality exchange ratio is @xmath14 where @xmath15 and @xmath16 are the numbers of the members of the two groups at the beginning of the conflict ( at @xmath17 ) . for developing of intuition and decision skills it is of interest to know @xmath3 and @xmath4 in closed form .
such analytical solutions are possible only in small number of cases .
section 2 contains the solution of the system of model equations for selected values of the parameters @xmath18 .
several concluding remarks are summarized in section 3 .
the linear model of lanchester describes position conflicts such as the battles for somna and verdune in 1916 .
the coefficients in ( [ epst1 ] ) are @xmath19 , @xmath20 .
the equation of state is quadratic @xmath21 where @xmath22 can be positive , negative , or @xmath23 . for the case
@xmath24 we obtain @xmath25 and the solutions are @xmath26 evidently @xmath27 which means that after endless position conflict the two groups are destroyed and no one of them wins .
however the situation changes if @xmath28 .
let us first assume that @xmath29 . from the state equation ( [ steq1 ] ) @xmath30 and
the solutions of the model system of equations are @xmath31 where @xmath32 .
the obtained solutions satisfy the initial conditions @xmath33 , @xmath34 .
in addition at @xmath35 we obtain @xmath36 and @xmath37 . in other words
the blue group will win the conflict if it lasts long enough .
the red group commanders have to change the strategy if they want to escape the defeat .
if this does not happen after the time @xmath38 from the beginning the red group will be completely destroyed - fig
. 1 . ) .
the conflict ends at finite time by destruction of the red group .
nevertheless the blue group suffers heavy losses.,width=529 ] we note again that this happens when @xmath29 , i.e. , when @xmath39 the condition ( [ sqlaw ] ) ( but with @xmath40 instead of @xmath41 ) for military combats is known as the square law of lanchester : to stalemate and adversay army two times as numerous as yours , your army must be four times as effective .
but in this case our army will be also destroyed .
thus the correct statement of the square law is as follows : to stalemate and adversay army two times as numerous as yours , your army must be four times as effective .
in other words : in position war , in order to stop army that is @xmath42 time larger than yours your army has to be more than @xmath43 technologically better ( to have more than @xmath43 times larger firepower ) .
we now discuss the case @xmath44 .
the solutions of the model equations are @xmath45 now the red group wins if @xmath46 i.e. when @xmath47 , @xmath48 . in this case
the coefficients in the general model are @xmath49 and the equation of state is @xmath50 epstein assumes that stalemate occurs when @xmath51 , i.e. , when @xmath52 .
let us discuss this in more details .
if @xmath53 ( epstein case ) then the solution of the model system of equations is @xmath54 thus at @xmath55 , none of the groups wins , the attack is stopped but the two groups are completely destroyed . this of course is not of favor for the group leaders . in order to consider more realistic scenarios we have to set @xmath56 . in this case
the solutions of the model equations are @xmath57 where @xmath58 and @xmath59 . now
the sign of @xmath60 determines the asymptotic behavior of the number of members of the two groups . if @xmath61 then @xmath62 and @xmath63 .
thus the blue groups wins and the results of the attack is that the red group is defeated -fig.2 ) . , width=529 ] now let @xmath64 .
then @xmath65 in this case as winner from the attack scenario is the red group as @xmath66 , @xmath67 . now let us discuss the following detail .
let us assume that at the beginning of the attack the blue group has more soldiers than the red group : @xmath68 but the firepower of the red group is larger : @xmath69 .
then there must be a moment @xmath70 where the two groups will have equal number of armed members : @xmath71 .
this moment @xmath70 can be determined from the equation of state ( [ steq2 ] ) @xmath72 what is interesting that when @xmath73 a solution exists only if @xmath74 and it is ( see fig.3 ) ) , width=529 ] @xmath75 for this case @xmath76 , @xmath77 .
the equation of state is @xmath78 what is interesting here is that the large group does not win in any case .
let for an example @xmath79 .
then the solutions of the model equations are @xmath80 which means that none wins ( @xmath81 ) and the groups are destroyed .
this of course is not acceptable for both sides .
more realistic are situations where @xmath82 .
let first @xmath83 .
the solution of the model equations is @xmath84 where @xmath85 and @xmath86 .
thus in the asymptotic case @xmath87 and @xmath63 , i.e. the blue groups wins .
quite interesting is the case @xmath88 . in this case
the solution of the model system is @xmath89 where @xmath90 , @xmath91 . in this case at @xmath92
we obtain @xmath93 .
thus at @xmath94 this conflict ends .
blue group is completely destroyed and the red group wins . for these models @xmath95 , @xmath96 and @xmath97 .
epstein @xcite argues that the exponents @xmath18 in the general model ( [ epst1 ] ) should be kept in the interval @xmath98 $ ] .
however there is no evidence to sustain such an assertion .
here we investigate two models for which some of the exponents @xmath18 equal @xmath99 .
let first @xmath100 , @xmath101 .
the model equations are @xmath102 the equation of state is @xmath103 if @xmath24 then the equation of the state together with one of the model equations yield @xmath104 no one of the groups wins at @xmath105 . if @xmath106 we obtain @xmath107 where @xmath108 .
thus @xmath63 and @xmath109 .
if @xmath110 @xmath111 thus @xmath112 and @xmath66 .
let now @xmath113 and @xmath114 . the equilibrium condition ( [ icer ] ) becomes @xmath115^{\epsilon } , \epsilon = \frac{r}{b}\ ] ] the final solution is @xmath116 where @xmath117 is a typical time of decay .
let us form the ratio @xmath118 where @xmath119 or @xmath120 .
assuming @xmath68 but @xmath69 and letting @xmath121 we obtain @xmath122 \hskip.5 cm \kappa = \frac{r+b}{r - b}\ ] ] thus @xmath123 at @xmath124 . nevertheless , both groups , fight to the end ( @xmath125 ) .
it is known from the history of the conflicts that epidemic events had frequently occurred particularly in case of attrition and ambush conflicts .
the simplest way to account for this effect ( removing of conflict participants because of sickness ) is to modify the general model as follows @xmath126 where @xmath127 and @xmath128 are coefficients of morbility ( sick rate ) removal .
generally @xmath129 .
we choose to demonstrate the effect of epidemics on the model ( [ steq3 ] ) in the form @xmath130 hence @xmath131 where @xmath132 @xmath133 @xmath134 in the general case ( [ dop4 ] ) the quantity @xmath135 can be zero , positive or negative .
for an example if @xmath136 the solution of the model system is @xmath137 where @xmath138 these solutions degenerate into ( [ solution31 ] ) at @xmath139 .
a class of mathematical models of armed conflicts ( [ epst1 ] ) was investigated .
the purpose was to identify particular cases with exact simple solutions in analytical form @xmath140 and @xmath141 , where @xmath1 and @xmath0 were the armies numbers .
it was found that these requirements were met by the linear ( lanchester s ) model known from long ago in the form ( [ steq1 ] ) as well as by several nonlinear models described in this paper .
these models demonstrate rich behavior in the time . *
no one of the two groups @xmath1 and @xmath0 wins after endless ( @xmath105 ) attrition conflict- fighting to the finish ( [ res1 ] ) , ( [ sol6y ] ) * one of the groups wins after limited in time or after an endless conflict ( see table 1 ) + -2.5 cm + .summary of model predictions .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] both conflicting groups are defined by their initial numbers @xmath15 , @xmath16 and respective firing efectivenesses per shot . the character of the conflict is modeled by the form of the functions @xmath7 and @xmath8 ( [ model1 ] ) which can be linear or nonlinear .
all models can be extended to account for occuring of epidemic events in the fighting groups .
the model ( [ dop2 ] ) is an example .
99 nature , * 337 * , 1989 , 701 - 704 . j. math .
sociology , * 18 * , 1993 , 47 -64 .
studies quarterly , * 37 * , 1993 , 55 - 72 .
usa , * 99 * , 2002 , 7193 - 7194 .
sci.usa , * 102 * , 2005 , 255 - 260 .
theoretical population biology , * 66 * , 2004 , 1 - 12 .
lett . a , * 349 * , 2006 , 350 - 355 .
chaos solitons & fractals , * 33 * , 2007 , 1658 - 1671 .
nature , * 135 * , 1935 , 830 - 831
. nature , * 148 * , 1941 , 598 - 598 .
soc . , * 107 * , 1944 , 242 - 250 .
soc . a , * 109 * , 1946 , 130 - 156 .
int . security , * 12 * , 1998 , 154 - 165 .
american anthropology , * 109 * , 2007 , 318 - 329 .
j. infectious diseases , * 11 * , 2007 , 98 - 108 .
nonlinear dynamics , mathematical biology and social sciences .
addison - wesley , readings , ma , 1997 . | excited by fast advance physics applied mathematics complex systems nature society 1 - 8 ground success created 60 years ago l. f. richardson l. w. lanchester british scientists applied mathematical modeling of arms races military combats 9 - 12 research on wars military conflicts in military universities academies last 20 years after terrorist attack 11th september 2001 research actual for physicists applied mathematicians 13 - 15 paper follow terminology epstein @xcite applied ecological models lotka - volterra for combats two conflicting groups red group @xmath0 blue group @xmath1 model equations armed conflict @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 numbers armed members @xmath5 firing efectivenes @xmath7 @xmath8 linear or nonlinear functions character conflict epstein @xcite proposed class models conflict @xmath9 @xmath10 are real nonnegative coefficients if coefficients constants hard models if depend on number participants parameters environment soft ones characteristics model epst1 casuality exchange ratio ratio eliminated members red blue groups epst1 ] ) ratio is @xmath11 where @xmath12 @xmath13 .integral casuality exchange ratio is @xmath14 numbers members two groups at beginning conflict for intuition decision skills know @xmath3 @xmath4 in closed form analytical solutions in small cases section 2 contains solution model equations for values parameters @xmath18 concluding remarks in section 3 linear model of lanchester describes position conflicts battles somna verdune 1916 coefficients are @xmath19 @xmath20 equation state is quadratic @xmath21 @xmath22 can be positive negative or @xmath23 case @xmath24 obtain @xmath25 solutions are @xmath26 @xmath27 after endless position conflict two groups destroyed no wins situation changes if @xmath28 assume @xmath29 state equation @xmath30 solutions are @xmath31 @xmath32 solutions satisfy initial conditions @xmath33 @xmath34 at @xmath35 obtain @xmath36 @xmath37 blue group conflict if lasts red group commanders change strategy escape defeat if after @xmath38 red group destroyed conflict ends by destruction red group blue group suffers heavy losses happens when @xmath29@xmath39 condition @xmath40 instead @xmath41 for military combats square law of lanchester stalemate adversay army two times numerous army four times effective case our army destroyed correct statement law stalemate adversay army two times numerous army four times effective position war to stop army @xmath42 time larger army more than @xmath43 technologically better @xmath43 times larger firepower discuss case @xmath44 solutions model equations are @xmath45 red group wins if @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 coefficients model are @xmath49 equation of state @xmath50 stalemate occurs when @xmath51 @xmath52 discuss if @xmath53 solution model equations is @xmath54 at @xmath55 none wins attack stopped two groups destroyed not favor for group leaders realistic scenarios set @xmath56 solutions model equations are @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 sign of @xmath60 determines asymptotic behavior number of members two groups @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 blue groups wins red group defeated.2width=529 ] @xmath64 @xmath65 winner attack scenario red group @xmath66 @xmath67 discuss detail assume beginning attack blue group more soldiers red group @xmath68 firepower red group larger @xmath69 moment @xmath70 two groups equal armed members @xmath71 moment @xmath70 determined from equation of state steq2 ] @xmath72 @xmath73 solution if @xmath74 fig.3 ) width=529 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 equation of state @xmath78 large group win example @xmath79 solutions model equations @xmath80 none wins @xmath81 groups destroyed not acceptable both sides realistic situations @xmath82 @xmath83 solution equations @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 asymptotic case @xmath87 @xmath63 blue groups wins case @xmath88 solution model @xmath89 @xmath90 , @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 conflict ends blue group destroyed red group wins models @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 epstein @xcite argues exponents @xmath18 in general model in interval @xmath98 no evidence investigate two models exponents @xmath18 equal @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 model equations are @xmath102 state @xmath103 @xmath24 yield @xmath104 wins at @xmath105 if @xmath106 obtain @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath63 and @xmath109 @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath66 @xmath113 and @xmath114 equilibrium condition becomes @xmath115^\epsilon final solution is @xmath116 @xmath117 typical time of decay form ratio @xmath118 where @xmath119 or @xmath120 assuming @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath121 obtain @xmath122 @xmath123 at @xmath124 both groups fight to end ( @xmath125 ) epidemic events occurred attrition ambush conflicts account removing conflict participants sickness modify general model @xmath126 @xmath127 @xmath128 are coefficients of morbility sick rate removal @xmath129 demonstrate effect epidemics on model steq3 form @xmath130 @xmath131 @xmath132 @xmath133 @xmath134 quantity @xmath135 can be zero positive or negative @xmath136 solution is @xmath137 @xmath138 solutions degenerate into solution31 ] @xmath139 mathematical models of armed conflicts epst1 investigated identify cases with solutions @xmath140 @xmath141 @xmath1 @xmath0 armies numbers requirements met by linear lanchester s ) model steq1 ] nonlinear models models demonstrate rich behavior time no groups @xmath1 @xmath0 wins after endless @xmath105 ) attrition conflict one wins after limited time or endless conflict table 1 model predictions conflicting groups defined by initial numbers @xmath15 @xmath16 firing efectivenesses per shot character conflict modeled by functions @xmath7 and @xmath8 model1 linear or nonlinear models extended account for epidemic events in fighting groups model ( [ dop2 ] ) example 99 nature , 337, 1989 , 701 - 704 j. math . sociology , 18, 1993 , 47 -64 .studies quarterly 37 1993 55 - 72 usa 99 2002 7193 - 7194 sci.usa 102 2005 255 - 260 population biology 66 2004 1 - 12 349 2006 350 - 355 chaos fractals 33 2007 1658 - 1671 nature 135 1935 830 - 831 148 1941 598 - 598 107 1944 242 - 250 109 1946 130 - 156 security 12 1998 154 - 165 anthropology 109 2007 318 - 329 infectious diseases 11 2007 98 - 108 nonlinear dynamics mathematical biology social sciences addison wesley 1997 | 0.436279 | 2,962 | 1,587 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,694 | we show that in the minimal supersymmetric standard model , the mass of the lightest neutralino is experimentally unconstrained if the gut relation between the gaugino mass parameters @xmath0 and @xmath1 is dropped .
we discuss what the impact of light or massless neutralinos would be on their production at lep , as well as on electroweak precision data and rare decays .
( 10,10 ) ( 40,260)ippp/07/27 , dcpt/07/54 , bonn - th-2007 - 03 | in the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) @xcite , the masses and mixings of the neutralinos and charginos are given by their mass matrices @xcite @xmath2 respectively , with @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 , @xmath6 , with the weak mixing angle @xmath7 .
besides the masses of the @xmath8 and @xmath9 boson , @xmath10 and @xmath11 , respectively , the neutralino and chargino sectors at tree level only depend on the @xmath12 and @xmath13 gaugino masses @xmath0 and @xmath1 , respectively , the higgsino mass parameter @xmath14 , and the ratio @xmath15 of the vacuum expectation values of the two higgs fields .
the neutralino ( chargino ) masses are the square roots of the eigenvalues of @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) @xcite .
the lep limit on the chargino mass is @xmath18 gev @xcite , from which follows that @xmath19 gev .
if the gut relation @xmath20 is assumed , then @xmath21 gev , such that the lightest neutralino mass is constrained to @xmath22 gev @xcite .
however , if one drops the gut relation , @xmath0 is an independent parameter , allowing to tune the neutralino mass determined from the lowest - order mass matrix @xmath23 freely @xcite .
the neutralino mass is identically zero for @xcite @xmath24\sin(2\beta ) \approx 0.05 \frac{m_z^2}{\mu } = \mathcal{o}(1\,\mathrm{gev } ) .
\label{eq : zeromass } % \end{aligned}\ ] ] ( 200,80 ) ( -5,-10 ) ( 200,-10 ) ( 32,30)@xmath25 gev ( 340,80)@xmath26 ( 365,110)@xmath27 ( 245,108)@xmath28 ( 245,25)@xmath29 ( 230,83)@xmath30 gev ( 320,40)@xmath31 gev for @xmath32 , the neutralino @xmath33 is mainly a bino , i.e. , it couples to hypercharge , and the masses of the other neutralinos and charginos are of the order of @xmath1 and @xmath34 , see fig . [
fig : neutmixandmass ] . in the following ,
we discuss bounds on the neutralino mass from production at lep and from precision observables @xcite , as well as bounds from rare meson decays @xcite .
finally , we summarize bounds from cosmology and astrophysics @xcite .
the opal collaboration @xcite has derived upper bounds on the topological neutralino production cross section @xmath35 at lep with @xmath30 gev , normalized such that @xmath36 .
their observed limit at @xmath37 confidence level in the @xmath38@xmath39 plane is shown in fig .
[ fig : opalbounds](a ) . for @xmath40 gev
, one can roughly read off the upper limit @xmath41 fb , or equivalently , since @xmath42 , @xmath43 fb . this is already a very tight bound , since typical neutralino production cross sections can be of the order of @xmath44 fb . for bino - like neutralinos
, the main contribution to the cross section is due to @xmath45 exchange .
thus one can translate the opal bound on the neutralino production cross section into lower bounds on the selectron mass @xmath46 , for @xmath40 . in fig .
[ fig : opalbounds](b ) we show the contours of @xmath47 in the @xmath14@xmath1 plane , such that along the contours @xmath48 fb .
for example , for a fixed selectron mass of @xmath49 gev , the area below the @xmath50 gev contour in fig .
[ fig : opalbounds](b ) is excluded by lep .
another search channel at lep is radiative neutralino production , @xmath51 . due to the large background from radiative neutrino production @xmath52 , we find that the significance is always @xmath53 for @xmath54 pb@xmath55 and @xmath30 gev @xcite . at the ilc
however , radiative neutralino production will be measurable , due to the significant higher luminosity and the option of polarized beams @xcite .
( 200,100 ) ( 5,-10 ) ( 200,-40 ) ( 40,-5)*(a ) * ( 260,-5)*(b ) *
the invisible @xmath9 width @xmath56 is potentially very sensitive to a light or massless neutralino , due to the contribution from @xmath57 .
however , a light neutralino is mainly bino - like for @xmath58 gev , see fig .
[ fig : neutmixandmass ] . for a pure bino
, the coupling to the @xmath9 boson vanishes at tree level . in fig .
[ fig : invzwidth ] , we show the difference @xmath59 from the measured invisible width @xmath60 mev @xcite , in units of the experimental error @xmath61 mev , to the theoretical prediction @xmath56 . the calculations of @xmath56 include the full @xmath62 sm and mssm contributions , supplemented with leading higher - order terms @xcite .
the deviation from the measured width @xmath63 is larger than @xmath64 only for @xmath65 gev . for decreasing @xmath34
, the increasing higgsino admixture leads to a non - negligible neutralino coupling to the @xmath9 boson .
note that already the sm contribution to @xmath56 is more than @xmath66 larger than the experimental value @xmath63
@xcite .
( 200,150 ) ( -30,0 ) ( 170,0 ) ( 30,-1)*(a ) * ( 240,-1)*(b ) * we have also studied the impact of a massless or light neutralino on the @xmath8 boson mass , the effective leptonic weak mixing angle @xmath67 , the electric dipole moments of the electron , neutron and mercury , and the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon @xmath68 , but have found no significant constraints on the neutralino mass @xcite .
also rare decays like @xmath69 , @xmath70 @xcite , @xmath71 , @xmath72^+ \to \pi^+\tilde\chi^0_1 \tilde\chi^0_1 $ ] , do not constrain @xmath38 @xcite .
the impact of a light neutralino on its thermal relic density has previously been studied @xcite . if the neutralino accounts for the dark matter , its mass has to be @xmath73 gev , in order not to over - close the universe . however
, this bound can be evaded by allowing a small amount of r parity violation @xcite .
one would thus assume that the neutralinos are stable on the time scale of collider experiments , but are not stable on cosmological time scales .
light neutralinos could be thermally produced inside a supernova .
if their mean free path is of the order of the supernova core size or lager , the neutralinos escape freely and lead to an additional cooling of the supernova . to be in agreement with observations of the kamiokande and imb collaborations from sn 1987a , see ref .
@xcite , the cooling must not shorten the neutrino signal .
the energy that is emitted by the neutralinos is much smaller than that emitted by the neutrinos if @xmath74 mev @xcite , with @xmath75 gev . for heavy sleptons , @xmath76 gev ,
however , no bound on the neutralino mass can be set @xcite .
a very light neutralino would be a hot dark matter candidate .
the cowsik - mcclelland bound @xcite gives here @xmath77 ev @xcite , such that a light relativistic neutralino does not disturb the formation of large structures in the universe .
thus , a light or even massless neutralino can be in agreement with constraints from cosmology and astrophysics .
d. choudhury , h. k. dreiner , p. richardson and s. sarkar , phys .
d * 61 * , 095009 ( 2000 ) .
i. gogoladze , j. d. lykken , c. macesanu and s. nandi , phys .
d * 68 * , 073004 ( 2003 ) .
d. hooper and t. plehn , phys .
b * 562 * , 18 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0212226 ] .
a. bottino , n. fornengo and s. scopel , phys .
d * 67 * , 063519 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0212379 ] .
a. bottino , f. donato , n. fornengo and s. scopel , phys .
d * 68 * , 043506 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0304080 ] ; phys .
d * 70 * , 015005 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0401186 ] .
g. belanger , f. boudjema , a. cottrant , a. pukhov and s. rosier - lees , jhep * 0403 * , 012 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0310037 ] ; g. belanger , f. boudjema , a. pukhov and s. rosier - lees , arxiv : hep - ph/0212227 , j. s. lee and s. scopel , phys .
d * 75 * , 075001 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0701221 ] . h. k. dreiner , s. heinemeyer , o. kittel , u. langfeld , a. m. weber , and g. weiglein , in preparation .
g. abbiendi _ et al . _
[ opal collaboration ] , eur .
j. c * 35 * ( 2004 ) 1 [ arxiv : hep - ex/0401026 ] .
h. k. dreiner , o. kittel and u. langenfeld , phys .
d * 74 * ( 2006 ) 115010 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0610020 ] .
h. k. dreiner , o. kittel and u. langenfeld , arxiv : hep - ph/0703009 .
g. a. moortgat - pick _
et al . _ ,
arxiv : hep - ph/0507011 .
the aleph , delphi , l3 , opal , sld collaborations , the lep electroweak working group , + the sld electroweak and heavy flavour groups , hep - ex/0509008 ; hep - ex/0612034 ; lep electroweak working group , see : http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/lepewwg/welcome.html .
b. mcelrath , phys .
d * 72 * , 103508 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0506151 ] .
h. k. dreiner , c. hanhart , u. langenfeld and d. r. phillips , phys . rev .
d * 68 * ( 2003 ) 055004 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0304289 ] ; m. kachelriess , jhep * 0002 * , 010 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0001160 ] . | supersymmetric standard model @xcite masses mixings neutralinos charginos given by mass matrices @xcite @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath6 weak mixing angle @xmath7 @xmath8 neutralino chargino sectors depend on @xmath12 @xmath13 gaugino masses @xmath0 higgsino mass parameter @xmath14 ratio @xmath15 vacuum expectation values higgs fields neutralino chargino masses square roots eigenvalues @xmath16 ) @xcite lep limit chargino mass @xmath18 gev follows @xmath19 gev gut relation @xmath20 assumed @xmath21 gev lightest neutralino mass constrained to @xmath22 gev @xcite gut relation @xmath0 independent parameter neutralino mass lowest - order mass matrix @xmath23 neutralino mass zero for @xcite @xmath24 0.05 {m_z^2 = \mathcal{o{gev{eq zeromass{aligned ( 200,80 ) -5,-10 ) 32,30)@xmath25 gev ( 340,80)@xmath26 ( 365,110) ( 245,108) ( 245,25) ( 230,83) gev 320,40)@xmath31 gev neutralino @xmath33 bino couples to hypercharge masses neutralinos charginos @xmath1 @xmath34 fig . discuss bounds neutralino mass production lep precision observables rare meson decays summarize bounds cosmology astrophysics opal collaboration upper bounds topological neutralino production cross section @xmath35 at lep @xmath30 gev normalized @xmath36 limit @xmath37 confidence level @xmath38@xmath39 plane fig . @xmath40 gev upper limit @xmath41 fb @xmath42 @xmath43 fb tight bound neutralino production cross sections @xmath44 fb bino - like neutralinos main contribution cross section @xmath45 exchange translate opal bound neutralino production cross section lower bounds selectron mass @xmath46 @xmath40 fig fig opalbounds show contours @xmath47 @xmath14@xmath1 plane contours @xmath48 fixed selectron mass @xmath49 gev area below @xmath50 gev contour excluded by lep search channel lep radiative neutralino production @xmath51 background radiative neutrino production @xmath52 significance @xmath53 @xmath54 pb@xmath55 @xmath30 gev @xcite ilc radiative neutralino production measurable higher luminosity polarized beams 200,100,-40,-5 invisible @xmath9 width @xmath56 sensitive to light massless neutralino contribution @xmath57 light neutralino bino - like for @xmath58 gev pure bino coupling @xmath9 boson vanishes at tree level difference @xmath59 measured invisible width @xmath60 mev @xcite experimental error @xmath61 mev theoretical prediction @xmath56 calculations include full @xmath62 sm mssm contributions higher - order terms @xcite deviation from measured width @xmath63 larger than @xmath64 for @xmath65 gevdecreasing @xmath34 increasing higgsino admixture leads to neutralino coupling @xmath9 boson sm contribution to @xmath56 @xmath66 experimental value @xmath63 ( 200,150 ) ( -30,0 ) ( 170,0 ) ( 30,-1)*(a ) ( 240,-1)*(b ) studied impact massless light neutralino on @xmath8 boson mass leptonic weak mixing angle @xmath67 electric dipole moments electron neutron mercury anomalous magnetic moment muon @xmath68 no significant constraints on neutralino mass rare decays like @xmath69 @xmath70 constrain @xmath38 impact light neutralino on thermal relic density studied neutralino accounts dark matter mass @xmath73 gev not over - close universe evaded r parity violation neutralinos stable on collider experiments not stable cosmological time scales light neutralinos produced inside supernova free path supernova core size neutralinos escape lead to additional cooling supernova agreement with kamiokande imb collaborations sn 1987a cooling must not shorten neutrino signalenergy neutralinos smaller neutrinos @xmath74 @xmath75 heavy @xmath76 no bound neutralino mass light neutralino hot dark matter candidate cowsik - mcclelland bound @xmath77 light relativistic neutralino disturb large structures light massless neutralino constraints cosmology astrophysics choudhury dreiner richardson sarkar . d * 61 *, 095009 ( 2000 ) gogoladze lykken macesanu nandi phys . d * 68 * 073004 ( 2003 ) hooper plehn . b * 562 * 18 2003 ) hep - ph/0212226 bottino fornengo scopel phys d * 67 * 063519 ( 2003 ) hep - ph/0212379 bottino donato fornengo scopel d * 68 * 043506 ( 2003 ) - ph/0304080 d * 70 * 015005 ( 2004 ) hep - ph/0401186. belanger. boudjema cottrant pukhov rosier - lees * 0403 *, 012 ( 2004 ) hep - ph/0310037 belanger boudjemapukhov rosier - lees hep - ph/0212227 lee scopel phys 75 * 075001 2007 hep - ph/0701221 k dreiner heinemeyer o. kittel langfeld weber g weiglein preparation abbiendi opal collaboration 35 * 2004 ) hep - ex/0401026 dreiner o. kittel langenfeld 74 2006 ) 115010 hep - ph/0610020 hep - ph/0703009 a moortgat - pick hep - ph/0507011 aleph delphi l3 opal sld collaborations lep electroweak working group electroweak heavy flavour groups hep - ex/0509008 ex/0612034 electroweak working group http://lepewwg.web.ch b mcelrath phys . d 72 * 103508 2005 ) hep - ph/0506151 dreiner c. hanhart u. langenfeld d r. phillips phys . d 68 * 2003 ) 055004 hep - ph/0304289 m kachelriess 0002 ( 2000 ) hep - ph/0001160 | 0.356708 | 2,778 | 1,409 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,718 | a time projection chamber ( tpc ) is a strong candidate for the central tracker of the international linear collider ( ilc ) experiment and we have been conducting a series of cosmic ray experiments under a magnetic field up to 4 t , using a small prototype tpc with a replaceable readout device : multi - wire proportional chamber ( mwpc ) or gas electron multiplier ( gem ) .
we first confirmed that the mwpc readout could not be a fall - back option of the ilc - tpc under a strong axial magnetic field of 4 t since its spatial resolution suffered severely from the so called @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 effect in the vicinity of the wire planes . the gem readout , on the other hand ,
was found to be virtually free from the @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 effect as had been expected and gave the resolution determined by the transverse diffusion of the drift electrons ( diffusion limited ) .
furthermore , gems allow a wider choice of gas mixtures than mwpcs
. among the gases we tried so far a mixture of ar - cf@xmath3-isobutane , in which mwpcs could be prone to discharges , seems promising as the operating gas of the ilc - tpc because of its small diffusion constant especially under a strong magnetic field .
we report the measured drift properties of this mixture including the diffusion constant as a function of the electric field and compare them with the predictions of magboltz .
also presented is the spatial resolution of a gem - based ilc - tpc estimated from the measurement with the prototype .
ilc , tpc , mwpc , gem , cf@xmath3 , spatial resolution 29.40.cs , 29.40.gx | one of the most important issues of the current high energy physics is to find the higgs boson and to reveal its nature .
the lhc will most likely find a higgs candidate and the ilc is expected to follow it to complete the mission @xcite@xcite . to study the higgs properties in detail we need a high performance central tracker .
a tpc is a natural candidate for the ilc central tracker because of its very good performance in the past collider experiments @xcite . at the ilc , however , we need the highest possible tracking efficiency in a jetty environment and a momentum resolution one order - of - magnitude better than those in the past .
this requires very high 3-dimensional granularity ( a small voxel size ) and a space point resolution in the @xmath4 plane better than 100 @xmath5 m throughout the sensitive volume . in order to realize a tpc with such unprecedented performance , intense r&d programs are now on going in an international framework called the lc - tpc collaboration .
three technologies have been considered as the gas amplification device for the ilc - tpc : mwpc , micromegas @xcite and gem @xcite . in order to compare the different readout technologies
, we prepared a small prototype tpc with a replaceable readout plane consisting of a gas amplification device and a pad plane .
the results of the beam test at kek for a micromegas readout using a gas mixture of ar - isobutane(5% ) have already been published @xcite . in this paper our results of cosmic ray tests for an mwpc readout using a tdr gas ( ar - ch@xmath3(5%)-co@xmath6(2% ) ) @xcite and for a triple gem readout operated in a t2k gas ( ar - cf@xmath3(3%)-isobutane(2% ) ) @xcite are presented .
the gem - based prototype is described in ref .
@xcite , where the preliminary results of the beam test for the gem readout using a tdr gas or a p5 gas ( ar - ch@xmath3(5% ) ) are presented .
the sensitive volume of the prototype was @xmath7 260 mm in length and 152 mm in diameter .
the size of the pad plane was 100 mm @xmath1 100 mm .
the induction gap of the triple gem stack was increased later from 1 mm to 1.5 mm for the cosmic ray tests using a t2k gas , in order to increase the charge spread after gas amplification , while the transfer gaps ( 1.5 mm ) were maintained . a picture of the prototype is shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] .
photograph of the prototype just before installation into the gas vessel . ] for the mwpc readout the gem foils were replaced by two wire planes @xcite .
the sense - wire plane consisted of 20 @xmath5 m thick wires spaced with 2 mm pitch and was placed 1 mm above the readout pad plane , on which pad rows were arranged in parallel to the wires .
the drift region was delimited by a grid wire plane .
the grid wire plane consisted of 127 @xmath5 m thick wires strung 1 mm above the sense - wire plane with 2 mm spacing .
it should be noted that the sense - wire pitch and the wires - to - pads distance were kept small as compared to those in conventional tpcs in order to obtain the best spatial resolution and the highest two - track resolving power achievable with a practical mwpc readout ) was about 1.3 mm . ] .
the pad pitch was increased to 2.3 mm , from 1.27 mm in the case of the gem readout , corresponding to the increase in the width of the pad response function while the pad - row pitch ( 6.3 mm ) was retained .
the mwpc - tpc was operated inside a 5-t solenoid at desy and the gem - tpc data was taken inside a 1-t solenoid at the kek cryogenic center . a pair of long scintillation counters was used for cosmic ray triggers .
the readout electronics system for the aleph tpc @xcite was used for the chamber signal processing and the traditional multifit ( doublefit ) program @xcite was used for the data analysis of the cosmic ray events .
the hit coordinate along a pad row was determined by a simple charge centroid ( barycenter ) method using the pad signals within a charge cluster in the row . among the tracks recorded in the tpc , those which were nearly perpendicular to the pad rows ( sense wires ) and parallel to the readout plane were selected for later analysis .
the spatial resolution as a function of the drift distance ( @xmath8 ) obtained under a magnetic field ( @xmath2 ) of 4 t is shown in fig .
the sense - wire potential was set to 1200 v while the grid wires were grounded .
the drift field strength ( @xmath9 ) was 220 v / cm , at which the transverse diffusion constant ( @xmath10 ) of drift electrons is about 60 @xmath5m/@xmath11 . also shown in the figure is the result of a monte carlo simulation .
the simulation took into account the primary ionization statistics of incident tracks , the diffusion of drift electrons , the lateral displacement of the drift electrons ( charge spread ) near the wire planes due to the @xmath12 effect , and finally the avalanche fluctuation in gas amplification . spatial resolution measured with the mwpc readout in a magnetic field of 4 t.
the solid line shows the result of the simulation . ]
the simulation program garfield / magboltz @xcite was used to estimate the displacement of the drift electrons along the wire direction ( @xmath13 ) due to the @xmath12 effect as a function of the initial position along the track ( @xmath14 ) ( see fig .
[ fig3 ] and [ fig4 ] ) .
the simulated resolution clearly shows the large contribution of the @xmath12 effect at short drift distances and its reduction with increasing @xmath8 due to the declustering effect caused by the diffusion of the drift electrons @xcite .
simulated drift electron paths without diffusion in tdr gas for a track perpendicular to the wires ( @xmath2 = 4 t ) . ]
displacement of the arrival position of drift electrons on the sense wire as a function of the initial position along the track for @xmath2 = 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 t. the coordinate @xmath14 is measured from the point on the track right above the sense wire .
the increase of displacement ( @xmath13 ) , especially for large @xmath14 , degrades the spatial resolution significantly . ]
[ fig5 ] shows the simulated spatial resolution of the ilc - tpc equipped with the mwpc readout for @xmath2 = 0 , 1 and 4 t. the resolution for @xmath2 = 4 t is dominated by the @xmath12 effect throughout the drift region in spite of its decrease at long drift distances where the contribution of the electron diffusion increases .
the situation is worse for t2k gas because of the larger charge spread near the wire planes caused by the @xmath12 effect and the smaller declustering effect due to its small diffusion constant ( @xmath10 @xmath7 30 @xmath5m/@xmath11 at @xmath9 = 250 v / cm and @xmath2 = 4 t ) .
therefore t2k gas would not be a good choice for mwpc readout even if the mwpc itself operated properly in this gas mixture .
simulated spatial resolution of the ilc - tpc equipped with the mwpc readout operated in tdr gas ( left ) and in t2k gas ( right ) for tracks perpendicular to the wires and the pad rows . ]
the spatial resolutions measured under magnetic fields of 0 and 1 t are shown in fig .
the high voltage applied across each gem of the triple stack was 250 v and the electric fields in the transfer and induction gaps were set to 1.6 kv / cm .
the solid curves in the figure are the results of analytic calculation @xcite .
the resolution deterioration at short drift distances prominent for the t2k gas at 1 t is not caused by an @xmath12 effect but by the finite pitch of the readout pads ( 1.27 mm ) , which is not small enough compared to the charge spread after gas amplification in the gem stack ( @xmath7 270 @xmath5 m ) @xcite . spatial resolution as a function of the drift distance obtained with a t2k gas ( @xmath9 = 250 v / cm ) for @xmath2 = 0 and 1 t. the resolutions obtained in the beam test with a p5 gas ( @xmath9 = 100 v / cm ) are also shown for comparison . ] the spatial resolution ( @xmath15 ) at long drift distances is given by @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the intrinsic resolution and @xmath18 is the effective number of electrons , which is determined by the primary ionization statistics and the avalanche fluctuation for a single drift electron @xcite . since the diffusion constant
is determined from the @xmath8-dependence of the pad response width @xcite@xcite ( or given by magboltz ) one can evaluate @xmath18 from the @xmath8-dependence of the spatial resolution at long drift distances .
the value of @xmath18 thus obtained was about 21 , which is in good agreement with a simple estimate of 22.2 @xcite , indicating that possible dissociative attachment of drift electrons by cf@xmath3 molecules @xcite@xcite@xcite at the entrance to the gem stack is not significant if any .
we also measured the diffusion constant and the drift velocity in a t2k gas as functions of the drift field , covering from the diffusion minimum ( @xmath9 = 100 v / cm ) to the drift velocity near - maximum ( @xmath9 = 250 v / cm ) .
the drift velocity was estimated from the full width of the drift time distribution and the maximum drift length of the prototype .
the results are shown in fig .
[ fig7 ] along with the corresponding magboltz predictions , which closely reproduce the data points .
the reliability of magboltz for this gas mixture was thus confirmed for the practical range of the electric field for tpc operation .
transverse diffusion constants ( @xmath19 ) and drift velocities ( @xmath20 ) measured in t2k gas .
the curves represent the magboltz predictions . .
] fig .
[ fig8 ] shows the calculated resolution of a gem - based ilc - tpc operated in a t2k gas , assuming the diffusion constant given by magboltz for @xmath9 = 250 v / cm .
expected resolution of a gem - based tpc operated in t2k gas for tracks perpendicular to the pad rows . ]
mwpc readout turned out to be inappropriate for a tpc operated in a strong magnetic field because of a large @xmath12 effect on its spatial resolution .
therefore it can not be a fall - back option for the ilc - tpc .
a gem - based tpc using a t2k gas is a good candidate for the central tracker of the ilc experiment .
it operates stably and is expected to give the required spatial resolution of better than 100 @xmath5 m throughout the sensitive volume under a 4 t magnetic field .
we are grateful to the kek cryogenic center and the ipns cryogenic group for the operation of the superconducting magnet . this study is supported in part by the creative scientific research grant no .
18gs0202 of the japan society for promotion of science .
ronan , time - projection chambers , review of particle physics , phys .
b592 , 1 ( 2004 ) 261 .
y. giomataris , et al .
instr . and meth . a 376 ( 1996 ) 29 .
f. sauli , nucl .
instr . and meth . a 386 ( 1997 ) 531 .
matthias e. janssen ( on behalf of the flc - tpc group at desy ) , r&d ongoing at desy for a gem based tpc at the ilc : resolution studies ; techniques and results , ieee nuclear science symposium conference record ( 2006 ) 38 , and references cited therein . | important high energy physics find higgs boson reveal nature lhc likely find higgs candidate ilc follow complete mission @xcite study higgs properties high performance central tracker tpc natural candidate for ilc central tracker good performance past collider experiments ilc need highest tracking efficiency jetty environment momentum resolution better requires high 3-dimensional granularity small voxel size space point resolution @xmath4 plane better than 100 @xmath5 m tpc unprecedented performance r&d programs lc - tpc collaboration three technologies gas amplification device ilc - tpc mwpc micromegas @xcite gem @xcite compare technologies prepared small prototype tpc replaceable readout plane gas amplification device pad plane results beam test kek micromegas readout ar - isobutane(5% ) published @xcite results cosmic ray tests mwpc readout tdr gas - ch@xmath3(5%@xmath6(2% triple gem readout t2k gas ar - cf@xmath3(3%)-isobutane(2% presented gem - based prototype described in ref . @xcite preliminary results beam test gem readout tdr gas p5 gas ar - ch@xmath3(5%sensitive volume prototype @xmath7 260 mm length 152 mm diameter pad plane 100 mm @xmath1 100 mm induction gap triple gem stack increased 1 mm to 1.5 mm for cosmic ray tests t2k gas charge spread transfer gaps 1.5 mm maintained picture prototype fig . installation gas vessel mwpc readout gem foils replaced by two wire planes @xcite sense - wire plane 20 @xmath5 m wires 2 mm pitch 1 mm above readout pad plane rows parallel wires drift region delimited by grid wire plane 127 @xmath5 m wires 1 mm above plane 2 mm spacing sense - wire pitch wires - to - pads distance kept small best spatial resolution highest two - track resolving power 1.3 mm pad pitch increased to 2.3 mm from 1.27 mm pad - row pitch 6.3 mm retained mwpc - tpc operated 5-t solenoid at desy gem - tpc data 1-t solenoid kek cryogenic center long scintillation counters for cosmic ray triggers readout electronics system aleph tpc @xcite for chamber signal processing traditional multifit program @xcite data analysis cosmic rayhit coordinate along pad row determined by charge centroid method using pad signals tracks recorded perpendicular to pad rows parallel to readout plane selected for analysis spatial resolution drift distance @xmath8 under magnetic field 4 t shown in fig . sense - wire potential set to 1200 v grid wires grounded drift field strength @xmath9 220 v / cm transverse diffusion constant 60 @xmath5m/@xmath11 result monte carlo simulation ionization statistics tracks diffusion drift electrons lateral displacement near wire planes @xmath12 effect avalanche fluctuation in gas amplification spatial resolution measured with mwpc readout in magnetic field 4 t solid line shows result simulation simulation program garfield / magboltz @xcite displacement drift electrons along wire direction due to @xmath12 effect initial position track simulated resolution shows contribution @xmath12 effect at short drift distances reduction with increasing @xmath8 due to declustering effect diffusion simulated drift electron paths without diffusion in gas for track perpendicular to wires @xmath2 = 4 t )displacement arrival position drift electrons sense wire initial position for @xmath2 = 1 2 3 4 t coordinate @xmath14 measured from above wire increase displacement @xmath13 large @xmath14 degrades spatial resolution fig5 shows simulated spatial resolution ilc - tpc mwpc readout for @xmath2 = 0 1 4 t resolution = 4 t dominated by @xmath12 effect decrease long drift distances worse for t2k gas larger charge spread near wire planes @xmath12 effect smaller declustering effect small diffusion constant = 250 v / cm @xmath2 = 4 t t2k gas good choice for mwpc readout spatial resolution ilc - tpc operated in tdr gas t2k gas tracks perpendicular wires pad rows spatial resolutions measured under magnetic fields 0 1 t shown in fig . high voltage triple stack 250 v electric fields transfer induction gaps 1.6 kv / cm solid curves results analytic calculation @xcite resolution deterioration short drift distances t2k gas 1 t caused @xmath12 effect finite pitch readout pads 1.27 mm ) not charge spread after gas amplification gem stack @xmath7 270 @xmath5 m spatial resolution drift distance t2k gas @xmath9 = 250 v / cm @xmath2 = 0 1 t resolutions test p5 gas @xmath9 = 100 v / cm ) spatial resolution @xmath15 long drift distances by @xmath16 intrinsic resolution effective number electrons determined by primary ionization statistics avalanche fluctuation single drift electron diffusion constant determined from @xmath8-dependence pad response width @xmath18 from @xmath8-dependence spatial resolution long distances value @xmath18 about 21 with estimate 22.2 @xcite dissociative attachment drift electrons by cf@xmath3 molecules at entrance gem stack not significant measured diffusion constant drift velocity in t2k gas drift field diffusion minimum = 100 v / cm to near - maximum 250 v / cm drift velocity estimated from drift time distribution maximum drift length prototype results in fig magboltz predictions datareliability magboltz gas mixture confirmed electric field tpc operation diffusion constants drift velocities measured in t2k gas curves represent magboltz predictions fig shows calculated resolution gem - based ilc - tpc t2k gas assuming diffusion constant @xmath9 = 250 v / cm expected resolution tpc t2k gas tracks perpendicular pad rows mwpc readout inappropriate for tpc strong magnetic field large @xmath12 effect spatial resolution fall - back option ilc - tpc gem - based tpc t2k gas good central tracker ilc experiment operates stably expected required spatial resolution better than 100 @xmath5 m under 4 t magnetic field grateful kek cryogenic center ipns cryogenic group operation superconducting magnet study supported by scientific research grant 18gs0202 japan society promotion science ronan time - projection chambers review particle physics b592 ( 2004 ) 261 giomataris 376 ( 1996 ) 386 1997 ) 531janssen flc - tpc group desy r&d desy gem tpc ilc resolution studies techniques results nuclear science symposium record 2006 38 references | 0.431648 | 2,730 | 1,395 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,735 | outline : 1 .
introduction , 2 .
confinement , chiral dynamics and light scalar mesons , 3 .
chiral shielding of the @xmath0 , chiral constraints ( the cgl band ) , the @xmath0 and the @xmath1 in @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , 4 .
the @xmath5 meson radiative decays on light scalar resonances , 5 .
light scalars in @xmath6 collisions . evidence for four - quark components of light scalars is given .
the priority of quantum field theory in revealing the light scalar mystery is emphasized . | the scalar channels in the region up to 1 gev became a stumbling block of qcd .
the point is that both perturbation theory and sum rules do not work in these channels because there are not solitary resonances in this region . at the same time
the question on the nature of the light scalar mesons is major for understanding the mechanism of the chiral symmetry realization , arising from the confinement , and hence for understanding the confinement itself .
the qcd lagrangian is given by + @xmath8=@xmath9 + @xmath10 is a diagonal matrix of quark masses , @xmath11=@xmath12=@xmath13 @xmath10 mixes left and right spaces .
but in chiral limit , @xmath14@xmath150 , these spaces separate realize @xmath16 flavour symmetry , which , however , is broken by the gluonic anomaly up to @xmath17 as experiment suggests , confinement forms colourless observable hadronic fields and spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry with massless pseudoscalar fields .
there are two possible scenarios for qcd at low energy .
1 . non - linear @xmath7 model .
2 . linear @xmath7 model ( lsm ) .
the experimental nonet of the light scalar mesons , @xmath18 ( or @xmath19 ) , @xmath20(700 - 900 ) , @xmath21 and @xmath1 mesons , suggests the @xmath16 lsm .
hunting the light @xmath7 and @xmath20 mesons had begun in the sixties already and a preliminary information on the light scalar mesons in pdg reviews had appeared at that time .
but long - standing unsuccessful attempts to prove their existence in a conclusive way entailed general disappointment and an information on these states disappeared from pdg reviews .
one of principal reasons against the @xmath7 and @xmath20 mesons was the fact that both @xmath22 and @xmath23 scattering phase shifts do not pass over @xmath24 at putative resonance masses .
situation changes when we showed that in lsm there is a negative background phase which hides the @xmath7 meson in @xmath2 .
it has been made clear that shielding wide lightest scalar mesons in chiral dynamics is very natural .
this idea was picked up and triggered new wave of theoretical and experimental searches for the @xmath7 and @xmath20 mesons .
our approximation is as follows ( see fig.1 ) : @xmath26 = @xmath27 + @xmath28,\ t^0_0=t_0^{0(tree)}$ ] @xmath29= [ e^{2i\left(\delta_{bg}+\delta_{res}\right)}$]@xmath30/(2i\rho_{\pi\pi } ) $ ] = @xmath31@xmath32 = @xmath33 @xmath34 = @xmath35/[m^2_{res}-s+ \mbox{re}\pi_{res}(m^2_{res})-\pi_{res}(s ) ] = ( e^{2i\delta_{res}}-1)/(2i\rho_{\pi\pi})\,,\ t_{bg}=(e^{2i\delta_{bg}}-1)/(2i\rho_{\pi\pi } ) = \lambda(s)/[1-i\rho_{\pi\pi}\lambda(s)]$ ] , @xmath36 $ ] , @xmath37=92.4mev , + @xmath38= @xmath39 , @xmath40= @xmath41 , @xmath42=@xmath43 , @xmath44=@xmath45 , @xmath46=@xmath47 , @xmath48=@xmath49=@xmath50 .
+ figure 1 .
the graphical representation of the @xmath51 wave @xmath52 @xmath22 scattering amplitude @xmath53 .
@xmath54 $ ] , + @xmath55=@xmath56$]=@xmath57 .
@xmath58=@xmath59 gev , @xmath60=@xmath61 gev , @xmath62=@xmath63 gev , @xmath64=@xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67=0.33 , @xmath68=@xmath69 , @xmath70=@xmath71 , @xmath72=@xmath73 , @xmath74=@xmath75
+ figure 2 . the @xmath7 model .
our approximation . @xmath76 .
( @xmath77)=latexmath:[$32\pi(|t^0_0|^2 , the chiral shielding of the @xmath0 meson is illustrated in fig .
2(a ) with the help of the @xmath22 phase shifts @xmath79 , @xmath80 , and @xmath81 , and in fig .
2(b ) with the help of the corresponding cross sections .
@xmath82 @xmath83=@xmath84 gev@xmath85 , @xmath86 + considering the residue of the @xmath7 pole in @xmath53 as the square of its coupling constant to the @xmath22 channel is not a clear guide to understand the @xmath7 meson nature for its great obscure imaginary part .
@xmath87=@xmath88@xmath89+@xmath90@xmath91 $ ] . + the @xmath7 meson self - energy @xmath92 is caused by the intermediate @xmath22 states ,
that is , by the four - quark intermediate states if we keep in mind that the @xmath25 lsm could be the low energy realization of the two - flavour qcd .
this contribution shifts the breit - wigner ( bw ) mass greatly @xmath93=0.50 gev .
so , half the bw mass is determined by the four - quark contribution at least .
the imaginary part dominates the propagator modulus in the region 300mev@xmath94600 mev .
so , the @xmath7 field is described by its four - quark component at least in this energy region .
@xmath96 + @xmath97 + @xmath98 , + @xmath99 + @xmath100 , + @xmath101 @xmath102 our results are shown in fig .
3 . @xmath103@xmath15@xmath104@xmath15@xmath105=@xmath106@xmath15@xmath104@xmath107 + @xmath108 , where @xmath109@xmath15@xmath104@xmath15@xmath110=@xmath111 @xmath112 ; see fig .
so , the the @xmath113 decay is described by the triangle @xmath104 loop diagram @xmath114 .
consequently , it is due to the four - quark transition because we imply a low energy realization of the two - flavour qcd by means of the the @xmath25 lsm . as fig .
4 suggests , the real intermediate @xmath104 state dominates in @xmath115 in the @xmath7 region @xmath1160.6gev .
thus the picture in the physical region is clear and informative .
but , what about the pole in the complex @xmath89 plane ? does the pole residue reveal the @xmath7 indeed ?
@xmath117 , + @xmath118=@xmath119 , @xmath120 , @xmath121=@xmath122 it is hard to believe that anybody could learn the complex but physically clear dynamics of the @xmath113 decay from the residues of the @xmath7 pole .
30 m. gell - mann and m. levy , nuovo cimento * 16 * , 705 ( 1960 ) .
n.n . achasov and g.n .
shestakov , phys .
d * 49 * , 5779(1994 ) .
n.n . achasov and g.n .
shestakov , phys .
lett . * 99 * , 072001 ( 2007 ) .
i. caprini , g. colangelo , and h. leutwyler , phys .
lett . * 96 * , 132001 ( 2006 ) .
jaffe , phys .
d * 15 * , 267 , 281 ( 1977 ) .
achasov et al . , phys . lett . *
108b * , 134 ( 1982 ) ; z. phys .
c * 16 * , 55 ( 1982 ) .
n.n . achasov and a.v .
kiselev , phys .
d * 73 * , 054029 ( 2006 ) ; yad.fiz . *
70 * , 2005 ( 2007 ) .
g. colangelo , j. gasser , and h. leutwyler , nucl .
b * 603 * , 125 ( 2001 ) .
achasov , yad.fiz . * 65 * , 573 ( 2002 ) .
achasov , nucl .
phys . a * 728 * , 425 ( 2003 ) .
n.n . achasov and v.n .
ivanchenko , nucl .
b * 315 * ( 1989 ) 465 .
achasov and v.v .
gubin , phys .
d * 56 * , 4084 ( 1997 ) .
n.n . achasov and v.v .
gubin , phys .
d * 63 * , 094007 ( 2001 ) .
n.n . achasov and a.v .
kiselev , phys .
d * 68 * , 014006 ( 2003 ) .
achasov et al . , z. phys .
c * 27 * , 99 ( 1985 ) .
achasov , and g.n .
shestakov , z. phys .
c * 41 * , 309 ( 1988 ) .
t. mori et al . , j. phys .
. jap . * 76 * , 074102 ( 2007 ) ; k. abe et al .
, arxiv : 0711.1926 [ hep - ex ] .
n.n . achasov and g.n .
shestakov , phys .
d * 72 * , 013006 ( 2005 ) .
n.n . achasov and g.n .
shestakov , phys .
d * 77 * , 074020 ( 2008 ) . | scalar channels up to 1 gev stumbling block of qcd perturbation theory sum rules work in channels solitary resonances question on nature light scalar mesons major for understanding chiral symmetry qcd lagrangian given by @xmath8=@xmath9 + @xmath10 diagonal matrix of quark masses= @xmath10 mixes left right spaces in chiral limit @xmath14@xmath150 spaces separate realize @xmath16 flavour symmetry broken by gluonic anomaly up to @xmath17 confinement forms colourless hadronic fields breaking chiral symmetry with massless pseudoscalar fields two scenarios for qcd at low energy non - linear @xmath7 model 2 linear @xmath7 model experimental nonet light scalar mesons @xmath18 @xmath1 suggests @xmath16 lsm hunting light @xmath7 @xmath20 mesons begun in sixties preliminary information light mesons in pdg reviews appeared unsuccessful attempts existence disappointment disappearedprincipal reasons against @xmath7 mesons @xmath22 phase shifts pass over @xmath24 at resonance masses changes showed lsm negative background phase hides @xmath7 meson in @xmath2 shielding lightest scalar mesons in chiral dynamics natural triggered theoretical experimental searches for @xmath7 mesons approximation see fig.@xmath26 = +_0 @xmath29{2i\left(\delta_{bg}+_{res}\right@xmath30/(2i\rho_{\pi\pi @xmath31 = @xmath35/[m^2_{res}-s\pi_{res-^{2i\delta_{res}}-1)/(2i\rho_{\pi\pi}{bg}={2i\delta_{bg}}-1)/(2i\rho_{\pi\pi \lambda/[1-i\rho_{\pi\pi}\lambda) @xmath36 @xmath37=92.4mev @xmath38= @xmath39= @xmath41=@xmath43=@xmath45=@xmath47@xmath49@xmath50 representation @xmath51 wave @xmath52 @xmath22 scattering amplitude @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55=@xmath56@xmath57 @xmath58=@xmath59=@xmath61==@xmath65 @xmath67=0.@xmath68=@xmath69===@xmath75 figure 2 @xmath7 model @xmath76 @xmath77=latexmath:$32 chiral shielding @xmath0 meson illustrated fig . 2(a ) @xmath22 phase shifts @xmath79 fig 2(b ) cross sections @xmath82 @xmath83=@xmath84 @xmath86 residue @xmath7 pole @xmath53 coupling constant @xmath22 channel @xmath7 meson nature @xmath87=@xmath88@xmath89+@xmath90@xmath91 @xmath7 meson self - energy caused intermediate @xmath22 states four - quark states @xmath25 lsm low energy realization two - flavour qcd shifts breit - wigner bw mass @xmath93=0.50 gev half bw mass determined four - quark contribution imaginary part dominates propagator modulus region 300mev@xmath94600 mev @xmath7 field described four - quark component @xmath96 + @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 results fig . 3@xmath103= +=@xmath111 fig @xmath113 decay described by triangle @xmath104 loop diagram @xmath114 due to four - quark transition low energy realization two - flavour qcd @xmath25 lsm fig . 4 intermediate @xmath104 state dominates @xmath115 @xmath7 region @xmath1160.6gev picture physical region clear informative pole complex @xmath89 plane ? pole residue reveal @xmath7 ? @xmath117 @xmath118=@xmath119 @xmath120=@xmath122 hard to believe learn complex clear dynamics @xmath113 decay from residues @xmath7 pole gell - mann levy cimento * 16 *, 705 ( 1960 ) achasov shestakov phys . 49, 5779(1994 ) phys. 99 072001 ( 2007 ) caprini colangelo leutwyler phys . lett 96 132001 ( 2006 ) jaffe 15 267 , 281 ( 1977 ) achasov phys . lett108b 134 ( 1982 ) c 16 * 55 ( 1982 ) achasov kiselev phys d 73 * 054029 ( 2006 ) yad.fiz 70 * 2005 ( 2007 ) colangelo gasser leutwyler b 603 125 ( 2001 ) achasov yad.fiz 65 * 573 ( 2002 ) 728 425 ( 2003 ) achasov ivanchenko b 315 * ( 1989 ) 465 achasov gubin phys d 56 * 4084 ( 1997 ) achasov gubin phys d 63 * 094007 ( 2001 ) achasov kiselev d 68 * 014006 ( 2003 ) achasov phys c 27 * 99 ( 1985 ) shestakov phys 41 * 309 ( 1988 ) mori phys 76 * 074102 ( 2007 ) abe arxiv 0711.1926 achasov shestakov phys d * 72 * 013006 ( 2005 ) achasov shestakov phys77 ( 2008 ) | 0.416705 | 2,325 | 1,231 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,742 | the na60 experiment at the cern sps has studied low - mass muon pairs in 158 agev in - in collisions . a strong excess of pairs is observed above the yield expected from neutral meson decays .
after subtraction of the decay sources , the shape of the resulting mass spectrum is largely consistent with a dominant contribution from @xmath0 annihilation .
the associated @xmath1 spectral function exhibits considerable broadening , but essentially no shift in mass .
the acceptance - corrected @xmath2 spectra have a shape atypical for radial flow .
they also significantly depend on mass , pointing to different sources in different mass regions .
both mass and @xmath2 spectra are compared to recent theoretical predictions . for the na60 collaboration : , relativistic heavy - ion collisions , quark - gluon plasma , lepton pairs 25.75.-q , 12.38.mh , 13.85.qk | thermal dilepton production in the low - mass region is largely mediated by the light vector mesons @xmath1 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 . among these ,
the @xmath1(770 mev / c@xmath5 ) is the most important , due to its strong coupling to the @xmath6 channel and its short lifetime of only 1.3 fm / c , much shorter than the lifetime of the fireball .
theoretical predictions exist for changes both of the mass and the width which are tied directly @xcite or indirectly @xcite to chiral symmetry restoration .
while broadening of the @xmath1 is generally expected , changes of the mass are controversial . for masses @xmath70.9 gev / c@xmath5 , other hadronic processes set in , and partonic processes start to play a larger role as well . the first na60 results focused on the space - time averaged spectral function of the @xmath1 @xcite ; more details were added recently @xcite .
the present paper therefore concentrates on new developments : an analysis of the shape of the excess mass spectra @xcite , and in particular first results on acceptance - corrected @xmath2 and @xmath8 spectra for different mass windows .
mass and @xmath2 spectra are also compared to the latest theoretical developments @xcite .
details of the na60 apparatus are contained in @xcite , while the different analysis steps ( including the critical assessment of the combinatorial background from @xmath9 and @xmath10 decays through event mixing ) are described in @xcite .
the results reported here were obtained from the analysis of data taken in 2003 for in - in at 158 agev . the left part of fig .
[ fig1 ] shows the opposite - sign , background and signal dimuon mass spectra , integrated over all collision centralities . after subtracting the combinatorial background and the signal fake matches ,
the resulting net spectrum contains about 360000 muon pairs in the mass range 0 - 2 gev / c@xmath11 , roughly 50% of the total available statistics .
the associated average charged - particle multiplicity density measured by the vertex tracker is @xmath12 = 120 .
the vector mesons @xmath3 and @xmath4 are completely resolved ; the mass resolution at the @xmath3 is 20 mev / c@xmath5 .
a major part of the subsequent analysis is done in four classes of collision centrality ( defined through the charged - particle multiplicity density ) : peripheral ( 4@xmath1330 ) , semiperipheral ( 30@xmath13110 ) , semicentral ( 110@xmath13170 ) and central ( 170@xmath13240 ) .
the peripheral data can essentially be described by the expected electromagnetic decays of the neutral mesons , i.e. the 2-body decays of the @xmath14 , @xmath1 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 resonances and the dalitz decays of the @xmath14 , @xmath15 and @xmath3 @xcite .
this is not true in the more central bins , due to the existence of a strong excess . to isolate this excess with _ a priori unknown _ characteristics without any fits ,
we have used a novel procedure as shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( right ) , made possible by the high data quality . for each centrality bin ,
the cocktail of the decay sources is subtracted from the data by using solely _ local _ criteria @xcite .
the @xmath16 on the contrary , is not subtracted .
examples for the resulting difference spectra are contained in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( right ) for all centralities and in fig .
[ fig6 ] for the semicentral bin .
the qualitative features of the spectra are striking : a peaked structure is always seen , residing on a broad continuum with a yield strongly increasing with centrality , but remaining essentially centered around the position of the nominal @xmath1 pole .
further details on the subtraction procedure and the results , including a discussion of the systematic errors ( which reach up to 25% in the continuum region ) , can be found in @xcite .
a more quantitative analysis of the shape of the excess mass spectra vs. centrality has recently been performed , using a finer subdivision of the data into 12 centrality bins .
the data ( fig .
[ fig1 ] , right ) were subdivided into 3 windows , one central ( c ) in the mass range 0.64@xmath17@xmath18@xmath170.84 gev / c@xmath5 , and two adjacent ones on the left ( l ) and the right ( r ) with equal widths .
the spectral shape can then roughly be characterized by two yields : c-(l+r)/2 for the @xmath1-like peak , and 3(l+r)/2 for the underlying continuum .
the ratios peak/@xmath1 , continuum/@xmath1 and peak / continuum ( where @xmath1 stands for the cocktail @xmath1 ) are plotted in the left part of fig .
[ fig2 ] , compared to the rms of the total mass interval 0.44@xmath17@xmath18@xmath171.04 gev / c@xmath5 on the right .
three essential features should be noted .
first , the ratio peak/@xmath1 decreases from the most peripheral to the most central bin by nearly a factor of 2 , ruling out the naive view that the shape can simply be explained by the cocktail @xmath1 residing on a broad continuum , independent of centrality .
second , the sum of the ratios ( peak+continuum)/@xmath1 is the total enhancement factor relative to the cocktail @xmath1 ; it reaches about 5.5 in the most central bin .
third , the centrality dependences are largely consistent in the two plots .
in particular , the flat part up to dn@xmath19/dy=100 is followed by more rapid changes in all variables , statistically highly significant for the ratio continuum/@xmath1 and the rms . for different mass windows .
right : rapidity distribution of the excess data for the mass window 0.6@xmath17@xmath18@xmath170.9 gev/@xmath20 and for three selected @xmath2 bins . the measured data ( full markers ) are reflected around midrapidity ( open markers).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] for different mass windows .
right : rapidity distribution of the excess data for the mass window 0.6@xmath17@xmath18@xmath170.9 gev/@xmath20 and for three selected @xmath2 bins .
the measured data ( full markers ) are reflected around midrapidity ( open markers).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] dependences on @xmath21 were so far shown only as mass spectra associated with three different @xmath21 windows , without acceptance correction @xcite .
we have now obtained acceptance - corrected @xmath21 spectra associated with three different mass windows .
the na60 acceptance relative to @xmath22 as a function of @xmath21 is shown in fig .
[ fig3 ] ( left ) . in principle
, the acceptance correction requires a 3-dimensional grid in @xmath23 space .
however , the low populated bins in the phase space corners can introduce large errors once the correction is applied . to overcome this problem ,
the correction is performed in 2-dimensional @xmath24 space , using the measured rapidity distribution as an input .
the latter was determined with an acceptance correction found , in an iterative way , from monte carlo simulations matched to the data in mass and @xmath21 . on the basis of this rapidity distribution ,
0.1 gev/@xmath25 bins in mass and 0.2 gev/@xmath26 bins in @xmath21 were used to determine the remaining 2-dimensional correction .
once corrected , the results were integrated over the three extended mass windows 0.4@xmath17@xmath18@xmath170.6 , 0.6@xmath17@xmath18@xmath170.9 and 1.0@xmath17@xmath18@xmath171.4 .
gev / c@xmath5 .
the rapidity distribution of the central mass window is shown in fig .
[ fig3 ] ( right ) for three different @xmath21 windows .
it is interesting to note that it resembles closely the distribution of inclusive pion production , as measured by na49 for pb - pb .
the results for the acceptance - corrected @xmath2 spectra are summarized in fig .
the errors shown are purely statistical .
systematic errors arise from the acceptance corrections including the rapidity distribution used , the subtraction of the cocktail , and the subtraction of the combinatorial background plus fake matches . for @xmath2@xmath170.5 gev / c ,
the combinatorial background contributes most , ranging from 10 to 25% for semiperipheral up to central . for @xmath2@xmath71 gev / c ,
the statistical errors dominate .
the data show a significant dependence on mass , but hardly on centrality . to bear out the differences in mass more clearly
, the data were summed over the three more central bins and plotted vs. transverse mass @xmath27 in place of @xmath21 , as shown in fig .
[ fig5 ] ( left ) .
the inverse slope parameter @xmath28 as determined from differential fits of the @xmath8 spectra with @xmath29 , using a sliding window in @xmath2 , is plotted on the right .
the main features of the results are remarkable and somewhat unexpected . at very low @xmath8 ,
all spectra steepen rather than flatten , as expected from radial flow , equivalent to very small values of @xmath28 ( the @xmath4 resonance , placed just in between the upper two mass windows , _ does flatten _ as expected ) .
moreover , depending on the fit region , @xmath28 covers an unusually large dynamic range .
finally , the largest masses have the steepest @xmath8 spectrum , i.e. the smallest value of @xmath28 everywhere , again contrary to radial flow and to what is usually observed for hadrons .
all this suggests that different mass regions are coupled to basically different emission sources .
the qualitative features of the excess mass spectra shown above are consistent with an interpretation as direct thermal radiation from the fireball , dominated by @xmath0 annihilation .
as explained in detail in @xcite , the excess mass spectra , with _ no _ acceptance correction and no @xmath21 selection , can be approximately interpreted as the spectral function of the intermediate @xmath1 , averaged over momenta and the complete space - time history of the fireball . as already discussed in the first na60 publications ( see @xcite and earlier ref .
cited ibd . ) , the moving - mass scenario la brown / rho scaling @xcite was found to be incompatible with the experimental excess mass spectra . even considering fireball variations within extremes ,
this has basically remained unchanged .
other scenarios , characterized essentially by a broadening of the @xmath1 , have in the meantime been refined @xcite or newly developed @xcite .
a summary of the comparison of these latest theoretical results to the excess mass spectrum for the semicentral bin is contained in fig . [ fig6 ] .
hees / rapp @xcite have modified the fireball part of the original predictions for in - in in the 2@xmath9 region ( based on @xcite ) and have now also added 4@xmath9 processes , reflecting vector - axialvector mixing ; the latter makes a strong contribution for @xmath18@xmath71 gev / c@xmath5 .
renk / ruppert @xcite use the spectral function of eletsky et al . including baryonic effects in the 2@xmath9 region , coupled to a strong partonic contribution which dominates the yield for @xmath18@xmath71 gev / c@xmath5 .
dusling / zahed @xcite use a chiral virial approach including baryonic interactions , coupled again to some partonic contribution which is on a similar level as the hadronic yield for @xmath18@xmath71 gev / c@xmath5 .
all models achieve a reasonable description of the mass spectrum over the whole mass range , even in absolute terms . for @xmath18@xmath170.5
gev / c@xmath5 , the decisive role played by baryonic interactions in @xcite is seen in the upper right of fig .
[ fig6 ] by switching them off . for @xmath18@xmath71 gev / c@xmath5
, the agreement of all predictions with the data implies a low ( if any ) sensitivity to the dynamics here , equivalent to hadron - parton duality .
the @xmath27 spectra predicted by the models above are compared to the data in fig .
in contrast to the mass spectra , none of the predictions is presently able to provide a satisfactory description of the @xmath8 spectra over their full range .
it seems that the @xmath8 spectra are , in some sense , more sensitive to the dynamics than the mass spectra .
a quantitative understanding of the @xmath8 spectra may thus help to discriminate between the different sources and provide further insight beyond hadron - parton duality ( e.g. different radial flow effects for hadrons and partons ) .
summarizing , the previously measured excess mass spectra and the new acceptance - corrected @xmath2 and @xmath8 spectra present rather strict boundary conditions to theoretical modeling . beyond the @xmath1 spectral
function itself , this may also lead to a better understanding of the continuum part of the spectra . 00
r. d. pisarski , phys .
* 110b * , 155 ( 1982 ) g. e. brown , m. rho , phys . rept . *
363 * , 85 ( 2002 ) r. rapp and j. wambach , adv .
. phys . * 25 * , 1 ( 2000 ) r. arnaldi _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , phys .
* 96 * ( 2006 ) 162302 s. damjanovic _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) ( 2006 ) nucl - ex/0609026 h. van hees and r. rapp , phys .
* 97 * ( 2006 ) 102301 t. renk and j. ruppert , arxiv : hep - ph/0612113 ; t. renk _ et al .
_ , in preparation k. dusling , d. teaney and i. zahed , arxiv : nucl - th/0604071 g. usai _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , eur .
j. * c43 * , 415 ( 2005 ) m. keil _ et al .
_ , nucl .
instrum .
a539 * , 137 ( 2005 ) and * a546 * , 448 ( 2005 ) r. shahoyan _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , nucl .
* a774 * , 677 ( 2006 ) | thermal dilepton production low - mass region mediated by light vector mesons @xmath1 @xmath1(770 mev /@xmath5 important strong coupling to @xmath6 channel short lifetime 1.3 fm / c than fireball predictions for changes mass width tied to chiral symmetry restoration broadening @xmath1 expected changes mass controversial @xmath70.9 gev / c@xmath5 hadronic processes partonic processes first results focused on space - time averaged spectral function @xmath1 @xcite more details added present paper concentrates on new developments analysis shape excess mass spectra @xcite results on acceptance - corrected @xmath2 @xmath8 spectra for different mass windows mass @xmath2 spectra compared to latest theoretical developments @xcite details na60 apparatus in @xcite analysis steps combinatorial background @xmath9 @xmath10 decays results from data 2003 for 158 agev fig shows opposite - sign background signal dimuon mass spectra collision centralities net spectrum contains 360000 muon pairs mass range 0 - 2 gev / c@xmath11 50% of total statisticsaverage charged - particle multiplicity density by vertex tracker is @xmath12 = 120 vector mesons @xmath3 and @xmath4 resolved mass resolution at @xmath3 is 20 mev / c@xmath5 analysis in four classes of collision centrality : peripheral ( 4@xmath1330 ) semiperipheral ( 30@xmath13110 semicentral ( 110@xmath13170 central ( 170@xmath13240 ) peripheral data described by expected electromagnetic decays of neutral mesons 2-body decays of @xmath14 @xmath1 @xmath3 @xmath4 resonances dalitz decays @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath3 not true in central bins due strong excess to isolate excess used novel procedure in fig . high data quality each centrality bin decay sources subtracted from data local criteria @xmath16 not subtracted examples for difference spectra in fig fig1 for semicentral bin features peaked structure seen broad continuum yield increasing with centrality centered around nominal @xmath1 poledetails on subtraction procedure results systematic errors 25% in continuum region in @xcite quantitative analysis of excess mass spectra vs. centrality performed data into 12 centrality bins data fig subdivided into 3 windows one central mass range 0.64@xmath17.84 gev / c@xmath5 two adjacent left right equal widths spectral shape characterized by two yields c-(l+r)/2 for @xmath1-like peak 3(l+r)/2 for underlying continuum ratios peak/@xmath1 continuum/@xmath1 / continuum plotted in left part fig fig2 compared to total mass interval 0.44@xmath17@xmath18@xmath171.04 gev / c@xmath5 right ratio peak/@xmath1 decreases from peripheral to central bin by factor 2 shape explained by cocktail @xmath1 on broad continuum sum of ratios peak+continuum)/@xmath1 is total enhancement factor relative to cocktail @xmath1 about 5.5 in most central bin centrality dependences consistent in two plotsflat part up to dn@xmath19/dy=100 followed by rapid changes in variables significant for ratio continuum/@xmath1 rms mass windows rapidity distribution excess data mass window 0.6 three @xmath2 bins data reflected around midrapidity rapidity distribution excess data three bins around midrapidity dependences on @xmath21 shown as mass spectra associated with three @xmath21 windows without acceptance correction obtained acceptance - corrected @xmath21 spectra with three mass windows na60 acceptance relative to @xmath22 function of @xmath21 shown in fig acceptance correction requires 3-dimensional grid in @xmath23 space low populated bins in phase corners can introduce large errors correction performed in 2-dimensional @xmath24 space using measured rapidity distribution input determined with acceptance correction found from monte carlo simulations matched to data in mass @xmath21 0.1 gev/@xmath25 bins in mass 0.2 gev/@xmath26 bins in @xmath21 used to determine remaining 2-dimensional correctioncorrected results integrated over three mass windows 0.4 1.0 rapidity distribution central mass window shown in fig . for three @xmath21 windows resembles distribution inclusive pion production measured by na49 for pb - pb results acceptance - corrected @xmath2 spectra summarized in . errors statistical systematic errors from acceptance corrections rapidity distribution subtraction cocktail combinatorial background plus fake matches for @xmath2@xmath170.5 gev / c combinatorial background contributes most 10 to 25% for semiperipheral to central @xmath2@xmath71 gev / c statistical errors dominate data show dependence on mass centrality data summed over three central bins plotted vs. transverse mass @xmath27 @xmath21 in fig . inverse slope parameter @xmath28 determined from differential fits @xmath8 spectra with @xmath29 sliding window @xmath2 plotted right features results remarkable unexpected at low @xmath8 spectra steepen to small values of @xmath28 @xmath4 resonance between upper two mass windowsdepending on fit region @xmath28 covers large dynamic range largest masses have steepest @xmath8 spectrum smallest value of @xmath28 contrary to radial flow hadrons suggests different mass regions different emission sources excess mass spectra consistent with direct thermal radiation from fireball dominated by @xmath0 annihilation excess mass spectra no acceptance correction no @xmath21 selection interpreted as spectral function of intermediate @xmath1 averaged over momenta space - time history fireball moving - mass scenario brown / rho scaling @xcite incompatible with experimental excess mass spectra fireball variations remained unchanged other scenarios broadening @xmath1 refined @xcite or developed summary comparison theoretical results to excess mass spectrum semicentral bin in fig . hees / rapp @xcite modified fireball part predictions 2@xmath9 region added 4@xmath9 processes reflecting vector - mixing contribution for @xmath18@xmath71 / c@xmath5 renk / ruppert @xcite use spectral function of eletsky et al .baryonic effects 2@xmath9 region strong partonic contribution dominates yield @xmath18@xmath71 gev / c@xmath5 dusling / zahed @xcite chiral virial approach baryonic interactions partonic contribution similar hadronic yield @xmath18@xmath71@xmath5 models achieve reasonable description mass spectrum range @xmath18@xmath170.5 gev c@xmath5 decisive role baryonic interactions @xcite seen upper right fig . @xmath18@xmath71@xmath5 agreement predictions data implies low sensitivity dynamics equivalent hadron - parton duality @xmath27 spectra predicted compared data fig . satisfactory description @xmath8 spectra full range @xmath8 spectra more sensitive dynamics quantitative understanding @xmath8 spectra may discriminate sources provide insight beyond hadron - parton duality radial flow effects previously measured excess mass spectra new acceptance - corrected @xmath2 @xmath8 spectra present strict boundary conditions theoretical modeling may lead understanding continuum part spectra. pisarski , phys . 110b *, 155 ( 1982 ) g. e. brown , m.rho phys 363 85 2002 ) r. rapp j wambach phys 25 1 2000 ) r arnaldi na60 collaboration phys 96 2006 162302 s damjanovic collaboration 2006 nucl ex/0609026 h. van hees r rapp 97 2006 ) 102301 t. renk j ruppert hep - ph/0612113 renk k. dusling d. teaney i. zahed nucl - th/0604071 g. usai na60 collaboration eur j. c43 415 2005 ) m. keil nucl instrum a539 137 2005 a546 448 2005 ) r. shahoyan na60 collaboration nucl a774 677 2006 | 0.506091 | 3,378 | 1,734 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,753 | simion @xcite conjectured the unimodality of a sequence counting lattice paths in a grid with a ferrers diagram removed from the northwest corner .
recently , hildebrand @xcite and then wang @xcite proved the stronger result that this sequence is actually log concave .
both proofs were mainly algebraic in nature .
we give two combinatorial proofs of this theorem . | in this note we present two injective proofs of a strengthening of a conjecture of simion @xcite . to describe the result ,
let @xmath0 be the ferrers diagram of a partition viewed as a set of squares in english notation .
( see any of the texts @xcite for definitions of terms that we do not define here . ) the shape @xmath1 will be fixed for the rest of this paper .
consider a grid with the vertices labeled @xmath2 for @xmath3 as in figure [ rgrid ] .
place @xmath1 in the northwest corner of this array so that its squares coincide with those of the grid .
a _ northeastern lattice path _ is a lattice path on the grid in which each step goes one unit to the north or one unit to the east . let @xmath4 be the number of northeastern lattice paths from @xmath5 to @xmath6 that _ do not go inside @xmath1 _ ( although they may touch its boundary ) , and let @xmath7 be the set of such paths . in particular , @xmath8 if either the starting or ending point is inside @xmath1 .
simion @xcite conjectured that for all @xmath9 the sequence @xmath10 is unimodal .
lattice path techniques for proving unimodality were investigated by sagan @xcite , but the conjecture remained open at that point .
recently , hildebrand @xcite proved the stronger result that this sequence is actually log concave by mostly algebraic means . shortly thereafter , wang @xcite simplified hildebrand s proof using results about polya frequency sequences . in the present work , we will give two injective proofs of the stong version of simion s conjecture .
the one in sections [ seceasy ] and [ sechard ] employs ideas from hildebrand s proof while the one in section [ direct ] is more direct .
our injections come from a method of lindstrm @xcite , later popularized by gessel and viennot @xcite , that can be used to prove total positivity results for matrices . for an exposition ,
see sagan s book @xcite .
bna @xcite has used related ideas to prove the log concavity of a sequence counting @xmath11-stack sortable permutations .
we end this section by reiterating the statement of the main theorem for easy reference .
notice that when @xmath12 it specializes to the well - known result that the rows of pascal s triangle are log concave .
[ main ] let @xmath1 be the ferrers diagram of a partition and let @xmath4 be the number of northeastern lattice paths in the grid from @xmath5 to @xmath6 which do not intersect the interior of @xmath1 .
then for all @xmath9 the sequence @xmath10 is log concave .
this preliminary part of the first proof is from @xcite . we include it so that our exposition will be self contained .
we need to prove that for all @xmath13 we have @xmath14 to prove this , it suffices to show that @xmath15 because then , by symmetry , we also have @xmath16 now multiplying the last two equations together and simplifying gives the first .
the second inequality can be proved by demonstrating another pair of equations , namely @xmath17 and @xmath18 multiplying these two equations together and cancelling gives the desired result .
in this section we prove that ( [ easy ] ) holds by constructing an injection @xmath19 consider a path pair @xmath20 . then @xmath21 and @xmath22 must intersect .
let @xmath23 be their first ( most southwestern ) intersection point .
say that @xmath23 splits @xmath21 into parts @xmath24 and @xmath25 , and splits @xmath22 into parts @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
then the concatenation of @xmath24 and @xmath27 is a path in @xmath7 , and the concatenation of @xmath26 and @xmath25 is a path in @xmath28 .
so define @xmath29 .
it is easy to see that the image of @xmath30 is exactly all @xmath31 such that @xmath32 and @xmath33 intersect .
it is also simple to verify that if @xmath34 , then applying the same algorithm to @xmath35 recovers @xmath36 .
so @xmath30 is injective .
see figure [ easyf ] for an example .
in this section we construct an injection @xmath37 thus proving ( [ hard ] ) .
let @xmath38 .
if @xmath39 and @xmath40 are vertices of @xmath21 and @xmath22 , respectively , with the same first coordinate , define the _ vertical distance from @xmath21 to @xmath22 at @xmath41 and @xmath42 _ to be @xmath43 .
the vertical distance from @xmath21 to @xmath22 starts at 2 for their initial vertices and ends at 0 for their final ones .
since vertical distance can change by at most one with a step of a path , there must be some vertical distance equal to 1 .
let @xmath41 and @xmath42 be the first ( most southwest ) pair of points with vertical distance one .
it follows from our choice of vertices that @xmath21 must enter @xmath41 with an east step and @xmath22 must enter @xmath42 with a north step .
let @xmath24 and @xmath25 be the portions of @xmath21 before and after @xmath41 , respectively , and similarly for @xmath22 .
now let @xmath44 where @xmath45 is @xmath24 moved south one unit and @xmath46 is @xmath26 moved north one unit . since @xmath41 and @xmath42 are the first pair of points at vertical distance one , @xmath46 will not intersect @xmath47 and the concatenations are valid paths in @xmath48 .
in fact , the image of @xmath49 is exactly all path pairs @xmath50 that have a pair of points at vertical distance -1 .
applying the same procedure to the first such pair inverts the map and so @xmath49 is injective .
see figure [ newphi ] for an example .
this completes the first proof of theorem [ main ] .
the reader may wonder if we can do away with splitting our problem into two parts , that is , equations ( [ easy ] ) and ( [ hard ] ) .
the answer is yes , and the necessary injection is just a modification @xmath51 of the map @xmath49 .
this will give us a second , completely combinatorial , proof of our main theorem take a path pair @xmath52 .
notice that @xmath21 and @xmath22 must intersect .
so before the first intersection there must be a first pair of points @xmath53 ( on @xmath54 respectively ) at vertical distance 1 .
similarly , after the last intersection there must be a last pair of points @xmath55 at horizontal distance 1 , where horizontal distance is defined analogously .
let @xmath41 and @xmath56 divide @xmath21 into subpaths @xmath57 and use the same notation for @xmath22 . then define @xmath58 where @xmath45 is @xmath24 moved south one unit , @xmath59 is @xmath60 moved west one unit , and @xmath61 are defined in the analogous way but moving in the opposite directions .
it is a simple job to verify that @xmath51 is well - defined and injective just as we did with @xmath49 .
we have two final remarks .
first of all , it is clear from the geometry of the situation that if @xmath47 is self - conjugate then the sequence in theorem [ main ] is also symmetric , but this does not hold in general .
one might also wonder if this sequence has the stronger property that the associated polynomial generating function has only real zeros .
this is not always true as can be seen by taking @xmath62 and @xmath63 . in this case
the associated polynomial is @xmath64 which has two complex roots .
it might be interesting to determine for which shapes the real zero property holds . | present two injective proofs conjecture simion @xcite @xmath0 ferrers diagram partition squares english notation see texts @xcite definitions terms shape @xmath1 fixed rest paper consider grid vertices @xmath2 for @xmath3 figure rgrid place @xmath1 northwest corner squares coincide grid northeastern lattice path grid each step goes one unit north or east @xmath4 number northeastern lattice paths from @xmath5 to @xmath6 not inside @xmath1 @xmath7 set paths @xmath8 starting or ending point inside @xmath1 simion @xcite conjectured @xmath9 sequence @xmath10 unimodal lattice path techniques proving unimodality investigated by sagan @xcite conjecture remained open hildebrand @xcite proved sequence log concave algebraic means wang @xcite simplified hildebrand s proof results polya frequency sequences present work two injective proofs version simion s conjecture sections [ seceasy and sechard ] employs ideas hildebrand s proof section [ direct ] more directinjections from lindstrm @xcite popularized by gessel and viennot @xcite prove total positivity results for matrices see sagan s book @xcite ideas log concavity of sequence counting @xmath11-stack sortable permutations reiterating main theorem for @xmath12 specializes rows of pascal s triangle log concave let @xmath1 be ferrers diagram of partition @xmath4 northeastern lattice paths in grid from @xmath5 to @xmath6 intersect @xmath1 @xmath9 sequence @xmath10 is log concave preliminary first proof from @xcite prove @xmath13 @xmath14 show @xmath15 @xmath16 multiplying last two equations simplifying gives first second inequality demonstrating equations @xmath17 and @xmath18 multiplying cancelling gives desired result prove by constructing injection @xmath19 path pair @xmath20 @xmath21 and @xmath22 intersect @xmath23 be first intersection point @xmath23 splits @xmath21 into @xmath24 and @xmath25 splits @xmath22 into @xmath26 and @xmath27concatenation @xmath24 path in @xmath7 @xmath26 path @xmath28 define @xmath29 image @xmath30 is @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 intersect verify @xmath34 algorithm to @xmath35 recovers @xmath36 @xmath30 is injective see figure easyf example construct injection @xmath37 let @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 vertices of @xmath21 @xmath22 same first coordinate define vertical distance from @xmath21 to @xmath22 @xmath43 vertical distance to starts at 2 initial ends at 0 final ones vertical distance change one step path distance equal to 1 @xmath41 @xmath42 be first southwest pair points with vertical distance one @xmath21 enter @xmath41 east step @xmath22 north step @xmath24 @xmath25 portions of @xmath21 before after @xmath41 similarly for @xmath22 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath24 moved south one unit @xmath46 @xmath26 moved north one unit@xmath41 @xmath42 first points at vertical distance one @xmath46 intersect @xmath47 concatenations valid paths in @xmath48 image of @xmath49 path pairs @xmath50 points at vertical distance -1 same procedure first pair inverts map @xmath49 injective see figure [ newphi ] completes first proof of theorem main splitting problem into two equations easy hard yes necessary injection modification @xmath51 of map @xmath49 second combinatorial proof of main theorem path pair @xmath52 @xmath21 @xmath22 must intersect before first intersection first pair points @xmath53 @xmath54 at vertical distance 1 after last intersection last pair points @xmath55 at horizontal distance 1 @xmath41 @xmath56 divide @xmath21 into subpaths @xmath57 use same notation for @xmath22 define @xmath58 @xmath45 @xmath24 moved south unit @xmath59 @xmath60 moved west one unit @xmath61 opposite directions simple verify @xmath51 well - defined injective @xmath49 two final remarks if @xmath47 self - conjugate sequence in theorem [ main ] symmetric hold in generalwonder if sequence stronger property associated polynomial generating function real zeros not always true @xmath62 @xmath63 associated polynomial @xmath64 two complex roots interesting determine shapes real zero property holds | 0.3092 | 1,827 | 984 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,757 | hst acs and nicmos data are now of sufficient depth and areal coverage to place strong constraints on the formation and evolution of galaxies during the first 1 - 2 gyrs of the universe . of particular interest are galaxies at @xmath0 since they represent the earliest epoch accessible to current high - efficiency optical instrumentation . to this end , we have constructed a sample of 506 @xmath0 objects from all the deepest wide - area hst data ( udf , udf - parallel , and goods fields ) .
they have been used to construct an optimal determination of the rest - frame continuum uv lf at @xmath0 .
our lf extends to over 3 magnitudes below @xmath1 , fainter than has been done at @xmath2 . over the interval @xmath0 to @xmath2
, we find strong evidence for evolution in the uv lf .
though constraints on the faint - end slope remain modest ( and are consistent with no - evolution ) , the characteristic luminosity appears to have approximately doubled over the interval @xmath0 to @xmath2 , consistent with hierarchical expectations .
remarkably , this shift to lower luminosities extends to even higher redshifts . using all deep @xmath3 nicmos observations ( 800 orbits in total ) ,
we have been able to demonstrate that the bright end of the lf ( @xmath4 ) is at least 5 times lower at @xmath5 than at @xmath6 , with a similar deficit being established from our recent detections and first statistical sample of @xmath7 galaxies using our udf nicmos data . in these proceedings
, we discuss what is known about the uv lf and uv luminosity density at @xmath8 from current data and its evolution relative to @xmath2 .
we also describe several exciting prospects for advance in this area over the next year . | great progress has been made over the past few years in our observational understanding of galaxies at the end of the first billion years of the universe .
much of this progress has come at @xmath9 and has been due in large part to the substantial gains in surveying efficiency made in the optical by the advanced camera for surveys ( acs ) on hst .
this instrument provides us with a nearly @xmath10 increase in optical imaging efficiency over what was available with wfpc2 , higher resolution imaging , and a reasonably efficient , red @xmath11-band filter . putting together these capabilities with the well - established dropout technique ( e.g. , [ 27 ] ) , it became possible to select literally hundreds to thousands of galaxies at redshifts of @xmath9 @xcite .
experience over the past two years has shown that a simple @xmath12 color selection is remarkably effective at isolating galaxies at @xmath0 @xcite .
though a small fraction of the selected sources are found to be low mass stars and low - redshift galaxies , most of these contaminants can be eliminated by making some requirement on their stellarity ( i.e. , how pointlike they are ) or their flux in a bluer band ( e.g. , the @xmath13-band ) .
these results have now been verified spectroscopically down to @xmath14 @xcite . with this increasing understanding of the @xmath15-dropout selection , different studies attempted to construct rest - frame continuum @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) luminosity functions ( lfs ) at @xmath0 @xcite . despite small differences in detail ,
each of these studies find that there were significantly fewer galaxies at @xmath0 ( per volume element ) than at @xmath2 .
a recent determination of this lf by our team is shown in figure [ fig : ilf]a and incorporates the results from some @xmath18 @xmath15-dropouts selected from the two goods fields ( enhanced to include the sne search data to be goods v2.0 ) , two acs parallel fields to the udf , and the udf @xcite .
for comparison , we have also plotted the @xmath2 lf @xcite , and it is amazing to note that the @xmath0 lf extends fainter than at @xmath2 , demonstrating the remarkable surveying efficiency of current optical instrumentation .
it is also evident that our @xmath0 lf shows a much larger deficit at the bright end than at the faint end , suggesting that higher redshift galaxies are of much lower luminosity ( on average ) .
this explains ( at least in part ) why early searches down to brighter limiting magnitudes @xcite found more substantial evolution than similar searches down to fainter magnitudes @xcite .
we can look at this evolution more quantitatively . in figure
[ fig : ilf]b , we plot the likelihood contours for the @xmath0 lf and contrast it with the equivalent values at @xmath2 ( thick black cross ) .
the red shaded regions on this plot indicate those values of @xmath19 and @xmath20 which are ruled out at 95% confidence using the current hst data . though the constraints on the faint - end slope @xmath19 at @xmath0 are still somewhat modest , the preferred values for the characteristic luminosity @xmath20 are much fainter than at @xmath2 , suggesting that there has been evolution in the characteristic scales on which star formation is occurring .
this provides us with one of our first , most direct evidences for the hierarchical buildup of galaxies early in the history of the universe ( see also [ 14 ] and [ 29 ] ) .
further refinements to the @xmath0 lf should be forthcoming over the next year due to the availability of two additional deep fields to be taken with acs ( go-10632 ) .
extending the dropout search beyond @xmath0 requires the detection of objects in the infrared .
this has been difficult due to the well - known limitations of infrared technology and because @xmath7 objects are likely to be very faint . at @xmath0 ,
the characteristic luminosity is nearly @xmath21 mags fainter than at @xmath2 .
extrapolated to even higher redshift , these luminosities should be even fainter still , perhaps 0.3 @xmath22 . in the @xmath23-band
, this corresponds to a magnitude of 27.3 , which can only be reached in deep nicmos studies and very deep ground - based studies around massive lensing clusters .
the deep nicmos imaging over the optical udf provided us with one of our first opportunities to find @xmath7 galaxies .
the @xmath24 limiting depths in these data were 27.6 in the @xmath25-band and 27.4 in the @xmath26-band .
moreover , the optical data for this field were more than sufficient to set strong constraints on the @xmath27-band fluxes . using a relatively aggressive set of detection criteria
, we carried out a @xmath27-dropout selection on these data and found 5 @xmath7 candidates .
successive tests on our selection including scattering experiments and selection on the negative images suggested that most of our 5 candidates were likely at @xmath7 and there was only one contaminant .
we therefore adopted as our likely sample 4 fiducial candidates . to assess the implications of this first statistical sample of @xmath7 objects
, we generated no - evolution predictions based upon a lower redshift @xmath28 @xmath29-dropout sample@xcite using our well - established cloning machinery @xcite .
an important consideration in projecting these lower redshift samples to high redshifts was the observed evolution in size @xcite and uv color @xcite .
running through these simulations , we estimated that 14 objects would be found ( if there was no - evolution from @xmath28 ) .
we compared this prediction with our 4 fiducial @xmath11-dropout candidates , given the expected small but non - zero contamination .
this suggested that the rest - frame uv ( @xmath30 ) luminosity density at @xmath7 was just @xmath31 that at @xmath28 ( number weighted ) or @xmath32 the @xmath28 value ( if we use a luminosity weighting ) .
though a first estimate of the rest - frame @xmath16 luminosity density at @xmath7 , our determination still suffered from some substantial uncertainties , notably the poissonian errors ( @xmath33% ) , cosmic variance ( factor of 2 ) , as well as the overall contamination level ( @xmath34 objects )
. this situation should improve substantially over the next year using data from two hst programs : ( 1 ) a deep @xmath27-dropout search in the field ( go-10632 ) and ( 2 ) a similar search around seven massive lensing clusters ( go-10504 and go-10699 ) .
both should yield @xmath35 @xmath7 candidates , substantially reducing uncertainties from our previously quoted estimates based on the hudf nicmos footprint .
simultaneously , searches with large ground - based telescopes are ongoing and have yielded a sizeable number of candidates , particularly around lensing clusters @xcite .
( @xmath17 ) lf estimated from the udf , the udf - ps , and the goods fields , shown in terms of the best - fit stepwise parameterizations ( _ red circles _ with @xmath36 errors ) and schechter function ( _ solid black line_)@xcite .
the @xmath2 lf is shown for comparison ( _ thick green line _ ) @xcite .
our @xmath0 lf shows a clear turnover at the bright end relative to the @xmath2 lf and suggests that there has been a shift in the characteristic luminosity from @xmath0 to @xmath2 .
_ ( right panel ) . _ the allowed regions of parameter space ( 95% confidence ) for the @xmath0 lf using current hst data @xcite .
the equivalent @xmath2 values are shown with the large black cross .
though only modest constraints are possible on the @xmath0 faint - end slope @xmath19 , the characteristic luminosity at @xmath0 appears to be @xmath37 mags fainter than at @xmath2.[fig : ilf],title="fig : " ] ( @xmath17 ) lf estimated from the udf , the udf - ps , and the goods fields , shown in terms of the best - fit stepwise parameterizations ( _ red circles _ with @xmath36 errors ) and schechter function ( _ solid black line_)@xcite .
the @xmath2 lf is shown for comparison ( _ thick green line _ ) @xcite .
our @xmath0 lf shows a clear turnover at the bright end relative to the @xmath2 lf and suggests that there has been a shift in the characteristic luminosity from @xmath0 to @xmath2 .
_ ( right panel ) . _ the allowed regions of parameter space ( 95% confidence ) for the @xmath0 lf using current hst data @xcite .
the equivalent @xmath2 values are shown with the large black cross .
though only modest constraints are possible on the @xmath0 faint - end slope @xmath19 , the characteristic luminosity at @xmath0 appears to be @xmath37 mags fainter than at @xmath2.[fig : ilf],title="fig : " ]
the detection and confirmation of galaxies at @xmath5 appears to be significantly more difficult than even at @xmath7 .
though the additional distance plays a small role , by far the biggest challenge is their luminosity : @xmath5 galaxies are expected to have very low luminosities , several times lower than at @xmath0 or @xmath7 @xcite . even assuming no evolution in luminosity from @xmath7 to @xmath5 , typical magnitudes for these objects would be @xmath3828 in the @xmath23-band , suggesting that one would need to probe to very faint magnitudes indeed .
one way of reaching such magnitudes is to use the very deep ir imaging capabilities of the hst nicmos camera .
unfortunately , even with this instrument , searches for @xmath5 objects are still extremely expensive , e.g. , @xmath39 orbits are needed to detect just one @xmath5 object , and this assumes that the uv lf does not evolve from @xmath5 to @xmath0 .
it is thus no surprise that there has been a lack of dedicated searches .
nevertheless , it is possible to take advantage of the deep @xmath25 and @xmath26 parallel data associated with several hst deep fields to conduct a search .
such data is available for the hdf - s ( 150 orbits ) and the udf ( @xmath38340 orbits ) .
there is also deep nicmos j+h imaging over the wfpc2 hdf - n ( 176 orbits ) and a portion of the acs udf ( 144 orbits ) .
the @xmath24 limiting magnitudes of these data range from @xmath40 to @xmath41 , which is sufficient to identify @xmath5 galaxies down to @xmath42 . to see what we could learn from these data
, we carried out a search for @xmath43 @xmath44-dropouts and found 11 objects @xcite .
we eliminated those objects with @xmath45 detections in the optical bands or with @xmath46 colors substantially redder than the typical starburst type object ( i.e. , uv continuum slopes @xmath47 ) .
this left us with 3 candidates , all of which are in the nicmos parallel fields to the udf . since we did not have comparably deep images blueward or redward of the @xmath48 passbands , it was difficult for us to be very sure about the redshifts of our 3 candidates . nevertheless , we could still compare these 3 candidates with the numbers expected assuming no - evolution from @xmath0 . repeating the simulations described in
3 , we estimated that 4.8 @xmath25-dropouts would be found , only somewhat higher than our 3 candidates .
if we assume that all three candidates were at @xmath5 , the normalization we would obtain for the @xmath5 lf is just @xmath49 that at @xmath0 . on the other hand , assuming that none of these candidates were at these redshifts , the normalization we would obtain is just @xmath50 the @xmath0 value ( @xmath36 ) .
remarkably , we found that these results were not very sensitive to cosmic variance ( @xmath51% rms ) .
this is due to the extremely large comoving distances probed in @xmath44-dropout searches ( @xmath52 mpc ) .
the current round of hst proposals should strengthen these constraints significantly . not only
will we increase the total nicmos observing time relevant to these searches by @xmath53% ( improving the statistics ) , but we will obtain some very deep acs observations ( @xmath54 mag at @xmath24 for apertures that match the nicmos data ) over the deep nicmos parallels containing our 3 @xmath5 candidates .
independent searches are also ongoing around lensing clusters ( go-10380 , go-10504 , gto-10699 , and [ 22 ] ) , and we note that there are claims by some teams to have a very good set of candidates .
current observations are now of sufficient quality to robustly determine the rest - frame @xmath16 ( @xmath55 ) luminosity function at @xmath0 .
these determinations extend to nearly three magnitudes below @xmath1 , fainter than has been possible at @xmath2 , demonstrating the efficiency of current optical technology .
substantial changes are evident in the lf relative to @xmath2 , suggesting that typical galaxies have more than doubled their star formation rates over this interval .
the observed evolution is suggestive of that expected from popular hierarchical models , and would seem to indicate that we are literally witnessing the buildup of galaxies over this range .
progress with higher redshift dropout samples has been less dramatic , but is still forthcoming .
our sample of @xmath7 @xmath27-dropouts in the hudf provided our first statistical sample of galaxies in this epoch and thus allowed an initial estimate of the luminosity density@xcite .
searches for higher redshift @xmath5 @xmath44-dropouts have resulted in some candidates as well as yielding some useful upper limits on the bright end of the @xmath16 lf @xcite .
galaxies at both times stand to undergo substantial improvements as the result of future and ongoing programs .
of course , for truly substantial gains in this area , we will need to wait for the availability of high resolution , high sensitivity space - based imagers , such as wfc3 or nircam ( jwst ) . | progress in understanding of galaxies end first billion years universe progress at @xmath9 due to gains in surveying efficiency advanced camera for surveys on hst instrument provides nearly @xmath10 increase in optical imaging efficiency higher resolution imaging efficient red @xmath11-band filter dropout technique possible to select hundreds to thousands of galaxies at redshifts of @xmath9 @xcite experience simple @xmath12 color selection effective isolating galaxies at @xmath0 @xcite small fraction selected sources low mass stars and low - redshift galaxies contaminants can be eliminated by on stellarity or flux in bluer band @xmath13-band results verified spectroscopically down to @xmath14 @xcite understanding of @xmath15-dropout selection studies construct rest - frame continuum @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) luminosity functions at @xmath0 @xcite studies fewer galaxies at @xmath0 per element than at @xmath2 recent determination of lf shown in figure incorporates results from @xmath18 @xmath15-dropouts from two goods fields search data two acs parallel fields to udf udf @xcite plotted @xmath2 lf @xcite @xmath0 lf extends fainter than @xmath2 surveying efficiency of optical instrumentation @xmath0 lf shows larger deficit at bright end than faint end suggesting higher redshift galaxies lower luminosity explains early searches to brighter magnitudes @xcite found substantial evolution than fainter magnitudes evolution quantitatively in figure plot likelihood contours for @xmath0 lf contrast with equivalent values at @xmath2 red shaded regions indicate values of @xmath19 and @xmath20 ruled out at 95% confidence using current hst data constraints on faint - end slope @xmath19 @xmath0 modest preferred values for characteristic luminosity @xmath20 fainter than @xmath2 suggesting evolution in characteristic scales star formation provides for hierarchical buildup of galaxies early in history universerefinements @xmath0 lf next year due two additional deep fields acs ( go-10632 ) extending dropout search beyond @xmath0 requires detection objects in infrared difficult due to limitations infrared technology @xmath7 objects likely faint at @xmath0 characteristic luminosity nearly @xmath21 mags fainter than @xmath2 higher redshift luminosities fainter perhaps 0.3 @xmath22 @xmath23-band corresponds magnitude 27.3 reached in deep nicmos studies deep ground studies massive lensing clusters deep nicmos imaging optical udf provided find @xmath7 galaxies @xmath24 limiting depths 27.6 @xmath25-band 27.4 in @xmath26-band optical data sufficient constraints on @xmath27-band fluxes aggressive detection criteria @xmath27-dropout selection found 5 @xmath7 candidates tests suggested most 5 candidates likely at @xmath7 one contaminant adopted likely sample 4 fiducial candidates generated no - evolution predictions lower redshift @xmath28 @xmath29-dropout sample@xcite using cloning machineryconsideration projecting lower samples to high redshifts was observed evolution in size uv color estimated 14 objects found no - evolution from @xmath28 compared prediction with 4 @xmath11-dropout candidates small non - zero contamination suggested rest - frame uv @xmath30 ) luminosity density at @xmath7 was @xmath31 @xmath28 or @xmath32 estimate rest @xmath16 luminosity density at @xmath7 suffered from uncertainties poissonian errors cosmic variance overall contamination level ( @xmath34 objects situation should improve next year using data from two hst programs deep @xmath27-dropout search similar search around seven massive lensing clusters both should yield @xmath35 @xmath7 candidates reducing uncertainties from estimates searches with large ground - telescopes ongoing yielded sizeable candidates around lensing clusters @xcite @xmath17 ) lf estimated from udf - ps goods fields shown best - fit stepwise parameterizations red circles errors schechter function black line @xmath2 lf shown for comparison thick green line@xmath0 lf shows turnover bright end suggests shift in luminosity from to right allowed regions parameter space 95% confidence for @xmath0 lf current hst data equivalent @xmath2 values with large black cross modest constraints possible on @xmath0 faint - end slope @xmath19 luminosity @xmath37 mags fainter than @xmath2. @xmath17 lf estimated from udf - ps goods fields best - fit stepwise parameterizations red circles errors schechter function black line @xmath2 lf shown for comparison thick green line @xmath0 lf shows turnover at bright end suggests shift in luminosity from to allowed regions parameter space 95% confidence for @xmath0 lf using current hst data @xcite equivalent @xmath2 values large black cross modest constraints on @xmath0 faint - end slope @xmath19 characteristic luminosity @xmath37 mags fainter detection confirmation of galaxies at @xmath5 more difficult than @xmath7additional distance small role biggest challenge is luminosity @xmath5 galaxies expected low luminosities lower than @xmath0 or @xmath7 no evolution luminosity from @xmath7 to @xmath5 typical magnitudes @xmath3828 in @xmath23-band faint magnitudes deep ir imaging hst nicmos camera searches for @xmath5 objects expensive @xmath39 orbits needed detect one @xmath5 object uv lf evolve from to lack of dedicated searches possible to deep @xmath25 and @xmath26 parallel data hst deep fields data available for hdf - s 150 udf orbits deep nicmos j+h imaging over wfpc2 hdf - n ( 176 orbits acs udf ( 144 orbits ) @xmath24 limiting magnitudes range from @xmath40 to @xmath41 sufficient to identify @xmath5 galaxies down to @xmath42 search for @xmath43 @xmath44-dropouts found 11 objects @xcite eliminated objects with @xmath45 detections or @xmath46 colors redder than typical starburst object uv continuum slopesleft 3 candidates in nicmos parallel fields udf deep images blueward or redward of @xmath48 passbands difficult to redshifts of 3 candidates 3 candidates with numbers no - evolution from @xmath0 estimated 4.8 @xmath25-dropouts somewhat higher than 3 candidates all three candidates at @xmath5 normalization for @xmath5 is just @xmath49 @xmath0 none at normalization just @xmath50 @xmath0 value @xmath36 ) results not sensitive to cosmic variance ( @xmath51% rms ) due to large comoving distances in @xmath44-dropout searches @xmath52 mpc current hst proposals strengthen constraints increase total nicmos observing time by @xmath53% obtain deep acs observations @xmath54 @xmath24 over deep nicmos parallels 3 @xmath5 candidates independent searches ongoing around lensing clusters ( go-10380 go-10504 gto-10699 [ 22 ] ) claims teams good set of candidates current observations sufficient quality to determine rest - frame @xmath16 ( @xmath55 ) luminosity function at @xmath0determinations extend three magnitudes below @xmath1 fainter at @xmath2 demonstrating efficiency current optical technology changes in lf relative to @xmath2 galaxies doubled star formation rates interval evolution suggestive hierarchical models witnessing buildup of galaxies over range progress with higher redshift dropout samples less dramatic still forthcoming sample @xmath7 @xmath27-dropouts hudf first statistical sample galaxies epoch allowed initial estimate luminosity density@xcite searches for higher redshift @xmath5 @xmath44-dropouts resulted candidates upper limits on bright end @xmath16 lf @xcite galaxies both times undergo improvements future programs substantial gains wait for high resolution high sensitivity space imagers wfc3 nircam | 0.503357 | 3,212 | 1,677 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,774 | the @xmath0 penguin - dominated modes @xmath1 have been observed at the @xmath2 factories . in addition , the collaboration has reported the first time - dependent @xmath3-violation measurement in @xmath4 . | these proceedings summarize measurements of @xmath2 decays to two kaons at the @xmath2 factories @xcite @xcite . observations of the @xmath5 and @xmath6 decays have been reported by the experiment @xcite at slac and the belle experiment @xcite at kek .
the collaboration has also performed the first time - dependent @xmath3-violation measurement in @xmath4 . the @xmath7 decay has not been observed by either experiment and the upper limits on its branching fraction were improved .
the @xmath8 penguin transition ( left ) and the annihilation amplitude in @xmath6 ( right).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=27.0% ] the @xmath8 penguin transition ( left ) and the annihilation amplitude in @xmath6 ( right).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=20.0% ] @xmath1 decays are expected to be dominated by the @xmath8 amplitude involving a virtual loop with the emission of a gluon ( fig .
[ fig : btodpenguin ] ) .
these decays are suppressed in the standard model ( sm ) , with branching fractions at the @xmath9 level .
assuming top - quark dominance in the virtual loop @xcite , the direct and mixing - induced @xmath3 asymmetries are expected to vanish in these modes .
however , contributions from up and charm quarks as well as from non - sm particles could induce sizeable cp asymmetries @xcite .
these modes are thus analogous to the @xmath10 decays in the measurement of virtual effects of contributions from non - sm phenomena @xcite .
additional amplitudes could affect @xmath11 penguin decays differently from @xmath12 penguin decays .
in addition , various relations between branching fractions and cp asymmetries in these modes provide a test of sm predictions @xcite .
finally , the @xmath6 decay has an annihilation contribution in the sm ( fig .
[ fig : btodpenguin ] ) .
thus , the difference in decay rate between the charged mode and the neutral mode can be used to constrain the effect of this amplitude in @xmath2 decays .
signal decays are separated from background decays using unbinned extended maximum likelihood fitting to distributions of kinematic and event - shape variables . the primary kinematic variables used to identify a reconstructed signal @xmath2 candidate are the difference between its reconstructed energy in the center - of - mass ( cm ) frame and the beam energy ; and a beam - energy substituted mass , @xmath13 , where the @xmath2-candidate momentum @xmath14 and the four - momentum of the initial @xmath15 state @xmath16 are calculated in the laboratory frame .
event - shape variables are used to suppress the dominant `` continuum '' @xmath17 @xmath18 background further , exploiting angular differences between the jet - like topology of continuum decays and the isotropically distributed decays of @xmath19 events .
particle - identification information is used to separate charged pion from charged kaon candidates in the @xmath6 and @xmath7 decays .
@xmath3 asymmetries in @xmath5 are determined from the difference in the time - dependent decay rates @xmath20 and @xmath21 for @xmath22 and @xmath23 signal decays , respectively , where @xmath24 .
\label{eq : eq1}\ ] ] + here @xmath25 is the time difference between the decays of the signal @xmath2 and the other @xmath2 in the event , @xmath26 is the average @xmath23 lifetime , and @xmath27 is the @xmath28 mixing frequency .
the amplitude @xmath29 describes @xmath3 violation in the interference between mixed and unmixed decays into the same final state , while @xmath30 describes direct @xmath3 violation in decay .
the time - dependent distribution is corrected for detector resolution effects and for mistag rates in the flavor identification of the other @xmath2 in the event .
@xmath5 decays are reconstructed in the @xmath31 and @xmath32 sub - decay modes . as the @xmath33 meson has a relatively long lifetime of @xmath34 ps
, its decay vertex is separated from the @xmath2 decay vertex by a few centimeters , which complicates the measurement of the @xmath35 position of the signal @xmath2 in the absence of prompt charged tracks originating from its decay vertex . to perform the measurement , used a method previously employed in other @xmath33 analyses without prompt charged tracks , wherein the @xmath2 meson is constrained in the vertex fit to decay within the beamspot in the plane transverse to the beam direction @xcite .
this method exploits the threshold nature of the @xmath36 decay , where the @xmath2 mesons are almost at rest in the cm frame ( @xmath37 mev / c ) and therefore have negligible displacement in the lab frame in the non - boosted transverse direction .
the resulting resolution of the @xmath35 position of the signal @xmath2 vertex is still better than the resolution on the vertex position of the other @xmath2 in the event , yielding a @xmath25 precision ( approximately @xmath38 ps ) comparable to that in modes where the signal @xmath2 has prompt charged tracks in the final state .
only @xmath33 mesons that decay within the silicon vertex tracker can be used with this technique . however , as there are two @xmath33 mesons in the final state , while only one is needed to employ this method , the fraction of signal decays suitable for the time - dependent measurement at is approximately @xmath39 in this mode .
if no time - dependent measurement is performed , an integrated flavor or charge asymmetry can be measured : @xmath40 + a non - zero value of this asymmetry signifies the presence of direct @xmath3 violation . in the @xmath41 modes ,
this is the only possible @xmath3 measurement .
both @xmath2 factories observe clear signals in this decay mode , with a branching fraction at the @xmath9 level , in agreement with each other and standard - model expectations .
observes the signal at the @xmath42 level of significance , including systematic uncertainties , while belle s observation is at the @xmath43 level .
the branching fraction results are summarized in table [ tab : ksks ] , while projections of the fitted data in the @xmath44 and @xmath45 variables with the results of the fit overlaid are shown in figs .
[ fig : belleplot ] and [ fig : babarplot ] .
the results of time - dependent @xmath3 measurement are presented in table [ tab : ksks ] and fig [ fig : babarcp ] . while the errors are still large , the measurement already excludes a fraction of the physically allowed region at a confidence level of greater than @xmath46 , as seen in fig .
[ fig : babarcp ] .
in particular , large positive values of @xmath29 are disfavored , although more data is needed to confirm this result .
belle did not perform a time - dependent measurement , but measured the time - integrated cp asymmetry , reporting @xmath47 . .
experimental results on @xmath5 decays , with the number of @xmath48 pairs listed in the last column . [
cols="<,<,^",options="header " , ]
each of the @xmath2 factories is expected to accumulate @xmath49 by the end of operations in @xmath50 . with these datasets ,
the error on the branching fractions of @xmath5 and @xmath51 should decrease to the @xmath52 level for each experiment .
also , each collaboration should achieve an error of @xmath53@xmath54 on @xmath29 and @xmath53@xmath55 on @xmath30 in @xmath5 .
these results will provide meaningful comparisona with theoretical predictions and constrain contributions from beyond - sm physics in @xmath0 fcnc decays .
the effect of the annihilation contribution in @xmath51 will be constrained as well .
the @xmath2 factories have observed the @xmath0 penguin dominated modes @xmath5 and @xmath51 .
the measured branching fractions are consistent with standard model predictions , although experimental errors are still too large for precision comparisons .
has also performed the first time - dependent @xmath3 violation measurement in @xmath5 , excluding a part of the physically allowed region at greater than @xmath46 significance .
this is the first step in the investigation of @xmath3 violation in @xmath0 flavor - changing neutral - current decays . | proceedings summarize measurements @xmath2 decays kaons @xmath2 factories @xcite observations @xmath5 @xmath6 decays reported by slac experiment at kek collaboration performed first time - dependent @xmath3-violation measurement in @xmath4 @xmath7 decay not observed upper limits branching fraction improved @xmath8 penguin transition annihilation amplitude @xmath6 penguin transition annihilation amplitude @xmath1 decays dominated by @xmath8 amplitude virtual loop emission gluon decays suppressed in standard model sm branching fractions at @xmath9 level top - quark dominance virtual loop direct mixing - induced @xmath3 asymmetries expected vanish contributions from quarks non - sm particles could induce cp asymmetries modes analogous to @xmath10 decays measurement effects non - sm phenomena additional amplitudes could affect @xmath11 penguin decays differently relations between branching fractions cp asymmetries test sm predictions @xmath6 decay has annihilation contribution in smfig btodpenguin difference in decay rate between charged neutral mode effect amplitude @xmath2 decays signal decays separated from background decays using likelihood kinematic event - shape variables primary kinematic variables reconstructed signal @xmath2 candidate difference between reconstructed energy center - mass beam energy beam - energy substituted mass momentum four - momentum initial calculated laboratory frame event - shape variables suppress dominant continuum @xmath17 background angular differences between jet - like topology continuum decays isotropically distributed decays @xmath19 events particle - information charged pion from charged kaon candidates in @xmath6 @xmath7 decays @xmath3 asymmetries in @xmath5 determined from difference time - dependent decay rates @xmath20 @xmath22 signal decays time difference between decays average @xmath23 lifetime @xmath28 mixing frequency amplitude @xmath29 describes @xmath3 violation interference between mixed unmixed decays final state @xmath30 direct @xmath3 violation decaytime - dependent distribution corrected for detector resolution effects mistag rates flavor identification other @xmath2 @xmath5 decays reconstructed in @xmath31 @xmath32 sub - decay modes @xmath33 meson long lifetime @xmath34 ps decay vertex separated from @xmath2 decay vertex by centimeters complicates measurement @xmath35 position signal @xmath2 prompt charged tracks used method @xmath2 meson constrained in vertex to decay within beamspot plane transverse beam direction method exploits threshold nature @xmath36 decay @xmath2 mesons at rest in cm frame negligible displacement in lab frame non - boosted transverse direction resolution of @xmath35 position signal @xmath2 vertex better than other @xmath2 @xmath25 precision @xmath38 ps comparable prompt charged tracks only @xmath33 mesons decay within silicon vertex tracker used technique two @xmath33 mesons in final state one needed fraction of signal decays suitable for time - dependent measurement approximately @xmath39no time - dependent measurement integrated flavor charge asymmetry measured @xmath40 non - zero value signifies direct @xmath3 violation @xmath41 modes only possible @xmath3 measurement @xmath2 factories observe clear signals decay mode branching fraction at @xmath9 level agreement standard - model expectations. observes signal @xmath42 level significance systematic uncertainties belle s observation @xmath43 level branching fraction results summarized in table projections fitted data @xmath44 @xmath45 variables shown in figs results time - dependent @xmath3 measurement presented in table fig errors large measurement excludes fraction physically allowed region confidence level greater than @xmath46 large positive values of @xmath29 disfavored more data needed belle time - dependent measurement measured time - integrated cp asymmetry reporting @xmath47 experimental results on @xmath5 decays number of @xmath48 pairs last column @xmath2 factories expected accumulate @xmath49 by end of operations in @xmath50 datasets error branching fractions decrease @xmath52 level each experiment collaboration error @xmath29 @xmath5 results provide comparisona constrain contributions beyond - sm physics @xmath0 fcnc decays annihilation contribution @xmath51 constrained factories observed @xmath0 penguin dominated modes measured branching fractions consistent with model predictions experimental errors large precision comparisons performed first time - dependent @xmath3 violation measurement @xmath5 excluding allowed region greater @xmath46 significance first step investigation @xmath3 violation @xmath0 flavor - changing neutral - current decays | 0.315431 | 1,901 | 936 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,787 | recent numerical investigations have uncovered a surprising result : reissner - nordstrm - de sitter black holes are unstable for spacetime dimensions larger than 6 . here
we prove the existence of such instability analytically , and we compute the timescale in the near - extremal limit .
we find very good agreement with the previous numerical results .
our results may me helpful in shedding some light on the nature of the instability . | in physics , stability of a given configuration ( solution of some set of equations ) , is a useful criterium for relevance of that solution .
unstable configurations are likely not to be realizable in practice , and represent an intermediate stage in the evolution of the system . nevertheless , the instability itself is of great interest , since an understanding of the mechanism behind it may help one to better grasp the physics involved . in particular , it is of interest to be able to predict which other systems display similar instabilities , or even have a deeper understanding of the physics behind the instability ( why is the system unstable ?
is there some fundamental principle behind the instability ? ) . in general relativity
, the kerr family exhausts the black hole solutions to the electro - vac einstein equations .
kerr black holes are stable , and can therefore describe astrophysical objects . however , there are many instances of instabilities afflicting objects with an event horizon , such as the gregory - laflamme @xcite , the ultra - spinning @xcite or superradiant instabilities @xcite and other instabilities of higher - dimensional black holes in alternative theories @xcite(for a review see ref .
@xcite ) . konoplya and zhidenko ( hereafter kz ) recently studied small perturbations in the vicinity of a charged black hole in de sitter background , a reissner - nordstrm de sitter black hole ( rnds ) @xcite .
their ( numerical ) results show that when the spacetime dimensionality @xmath0 , the spacetime is unstable , provided the charge is larger than a given threshold , determined by kz for each @xmath1 . because the results are so surprising ( the mechanism behind it is not yet understood ) , we set out to to investigate this instability and hopefully understand it better .
our results can be summarized as follows : ( i ) we can prove analytically the existence of unstable modes for charge @xmath2 higher than a certain threshold .
( ii ) in the near - extremal regime , we are able to find an explicit solution for the unstable modes , determining the instability timescale analytically .
we hope that our incursion in this topic helps to better understand the physics at work .
this work focuses on the higher dimensional rnds geometry , described by the line element ds^2 = -f dt^2 + f^-1 dr^2 + r^2 d_n^2 , [ lineelement ] where @xmath3 is the line element of the @xmath4 sphere and f=1-r^2-+ .
the background electric field is @xmath5 , with @xmath6 the electric charge .
the quantities @xmath7 and @xmath2 are related to the physical mass m and charge @xmath6 of the black hole @xcite , and @xmath8 to the cosmological constant .
the spacetime dimensionality is @xmath9 .
the above geometry possesses three horizons : the black - hole cauchy horizon at @xmath10 , the black hole event horizon is at @xmath11 and the cosmological horizon is at @xmath12 , where @xmath13 , the only real , positive zeroes of @xmath14 . for convenience , we set @xmath15 , i.e. , we measure all quantities in terms of the event horizon @xmath16 .
we thus get 2m=1+q^2- , furthermore , we can also write = . for a fixed @xmath17 and spacetime dimension @xmath1 , the existence of a regular event horizon
imposes that the charge @xmath2 must be smaller than a certain value @xmath18 . with our units
this maximum charge is q_ext^2=.[qext ] gravitational perturbations of this spacetime couple to the electromagnetic field , and were completely characterized by kodama and ishibashi @xcite .
they can be reduced to a set of two second order ordinary differential equations of the form , _ + ( ^2-v_s)_=0,[we ] where the tortoise coordinate @xmath19 and the potentials @xmath20 are defined through r _ * f^-1 dr , v_s = .
[ tortoise ] we have h_+&=&1-x , + h_-&=&m+(1+m)x , and the quantities @xmath21 are given by u_+ & = & y -^3 n^3 ( 3 n-2 ) ( n+1)^4 ( 1+m ) x^4 + & & + 4 ^2 n^2 ( n+1)^2 \{(n+1)(3n-2 ) m + 4 n^2+n-2 } x^3 + & & + 4 ( n+1)\ { ( n-2 ) ( n-4 ) ( n+1 ) ( m+n^2 k ) -7 n^3 + 7 n^2 - 14 n+8 } x^2 + & & + \{16 ( n+1 ) ( -4 m+3 n^2(n-2 ) k ) -16 ( 3 n-2 ) ( n-2 ) } x + & & + 64 m+16 n(n+2 ) k , + u_- & = & y -n^3 ( 3 n-2 ) ( n+1)^4 ( 1+m ) ^3 x^4 + & & -4 n^2 ( n+1)^2 ( 1+m ) ^2 \{(n+1)(3 n-2 ) m -n^2 } x^3 + & & + 4 ( n+1 ) ( 1+m ) \
{ m ( n-2 ) ( n-4 ) ( n+1 ) ( m+n^2 k ) .
+ 4 n ( 2 n^2 - 3 n+4 ) m+n^2 ( n-2 ) ( n-4 ) ( n+1)k } x^2 + & & -16 m \ { ( n+1 ) m ( -4 m+3 n^2(n-2 ) k ) .
+ 3 n ( n-4 ) m+3 n^2 ( n+1 ) ( n-2)k } x + & & + 64 m^3 + 16 n(n+2)m^2 k. the variables @xmath22 and parameters @xmath23 are defined through x & & , yr^2 , + ^2 & & m^2+,mk^2-n k , and the quantity @xmath24 is implicitly given by @xmath25 .
note that the following relations holds @xmath26 .
note also that for the spacetime considered in this paper @xmath27 , which means that the eigenvalues @xmath28 are given by @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the angular quantum number , that gives the multipolarity of the field .
behavior of @xmath31 for different parameters , for @xmath32 .
here we fix the event horizon at @xmath15 , and the cosmological horizon at @xmath33 .
we consider @xmath34 modes and three different charges , @xmath35.,width=340 ] the behavior of the potentials varies considerably over the range of parameters . in fig .
[ fig : pots ] we show @xmath31 for @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 and three different values of the charge , @xmath35 .
a sufficient ( but not necessary ) condition for the existence of an unstable mode has been proven by buell and shadwick @xcite and is the following , _ r_b^r_cdr<0.[vcriterium ] the parametric region of instability in @xmath36 coordinates , according to criterim ( [ vcriterium ] ) , for @xmath34 .
top to bottom , @xmath37.,width=340 ] the instability region is depicted in figure [ fig : threshold ] for several spacetime - dimension @xmath1 , which can be compared with the numerical results by kz , their figure 4 .
it is apparent that condition ( [ vcriterium ] ) very accurately describes the numerical results for @xmath38 , a regime we explore below in section [ sec : ne ] .
as one moves away from extremality criterium ( [ vcriterium ] ) is just too restrictive . an improved analysis and refined criterium
would be necessary to describe the whole range of the numerical results .
nevertheless , figure [ fig : threshold ] is very clear : higher - dimensional ( @xmath0 ) rnds black holes are unstable for a wide range of parameters .
let us now specialize to the near extremal rnds black hole , which we define as the spacetime for which the cosmological horizon @xmath17 is very close ( in the @xmath39 coordinate ) to the black hole horizon @xmath16 , i.e. @xmath40 . the wave equation in this spacetime can be solved exactly , in terms of hypergeometric functions @xcite .
the key point is that the physical region of interest ( where the boundary conditions are imposed ) , lies between @xmath16 and @xmath17 .
thus , f ~2_b , [ approximation2 ] where we have introduced the surface gravity @xmath41 associated with the event horizon at @xmath42 , as defined by the relation @xmath43 . for near - extremal black holes ,
it is approximately _
b ~(1-nq^2 ) . in this limit , one can invert the relation @xmath44 of ( [ tortoise ] ) to get r= .
[ rtortoise ] substituting this on the expression ( [ approximation2 ] ) for @xmath14 we find f = .
[ approximation3 ] as such , and taking into account the functional form of the potentials for wave propagation , we see that for the near extremal rnds black hole the wave equation ( [ we ] ) is of the form + ^2-(,r)=0 , [ waveequation2 ] with v_0= the potential in ( [ waveequation2 ] ) is the well known pshl - teller potential @xcite . the solutions to ( [ waveequation2 ] )
were studied and they are of the hypergeometric type , ( for details see refs .
it should be solved under appropriate boundary conditions : & ~ & e^-ir _ * , r _ * - + & ~ & e^ir _ * , r _ * .
[ behavior1 ] these boundary conditions impose a non - trivial condition on @xmath45 @xcite , and those that satisfy both simultaneously are called quasinormal frequencies . for the pshl - teller potential
one can show @xcite that they are given by = _
b , j=0,1 , .... [ solution ] .[tab : exponent ] the threshold of instability for near - extremal rnds black holes ( i.e. , black holes for which the cosmological and event horizon almost coincide ) for @xmath34 modes .
we show the prediction from the exact , analytic expression obtained in the near extremal limit ( [ analytic ] ) , which we label @xmath46 and the one from criterium ( [ vcriterium ] ) which we label as @xmath47 .
both these results are compared to the numerical results by kz . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] we conclude therefore that an instability is present whenever @xmath48 is negative .
the threshold of stability in the near - extremal regime is therefore given by = 0,[analytic ] the expression for @xmath49 is lengthy , and we wo nt present it here .
the values of the charge @xmath50 that satisfy the condition above are given in table i ( for @xmath34 ) , and compared to the prediction from the analysis in section [ sec : negativev ] , criterium ( [ vcriterium ] ) .
the agreement is excellent .
furthermore , we compare these predictions against the numerical results by kz , extrapolated to the extremal limit ( @xmath51 in kz notation ) .
the agreement is remarkable .
we have shown analytically that charged black holes in de sitter backgrounds are unstable for a wide range of charge and mass of the black hole , confirming previous numerical studies @xcite .
the stability properties of the extremal @xmath52 black hole remain unknown .
our methods and results and inconclusive at this precise point , further dedicated investigations would be necessary .
our analytical result in the near - extremal regime could be used to investigate further the nature of this instability , something we have not attempted to do here .
a possible refinement concerns the large-@xmath1 limit of the instability , where it _ could _
be possible to find an analytical expression throughout all range of parameters .
we have in mind results and techniques similar to those of kol and sorkin @xcite .
it would also be interesting to investigate the stability properties , using this or other techniques , of near - extremal kerr - ds black holes , which have recently been conjectured to have an holographic description @xcite .
we warmly thank roman konoplya and alexander zhidenko for useful correspondence and for sharing their numerical results with us .
this work was partially funded by fundao para a cincia e tecnologia ( fct)-portugal through projects ptdc / fis/64175/2006 , ptdc/ fis/098025/2008 , ptdc / fis/098032/2008 and cern / fp/109290/2009 .
r. emparan and r. c. myers , jhep
* 0309 * , 025 ( 2003 ) ; o. j. c. dias , p. figueras , r. monteiro , j. e. santos and r. emparan , arxiv:0907.2248 [ hep - th ] . v. cardoso , o. j. c. dias , j. p. s. lemos and s. yoshida , phys . rev .
d * 70 * , 044039 ( 2004 ) [ erratum - ibid .
d * 70 * , 049903 ( 2004 ) ] ; v. cardoso and o. j. c. dias , phys .
d * 70 * , 084011 ( 2004 ) ; v. cardoso and s. yoshida , jhep * 0507 * , 009 ( 2005 ) ; v. cardoso , o. j. c. dias and s. yoshida , phys .
d * 74 * , 044008 ( 2006 ) ; v. cardoso and j. p. s. lemos , phys .
b * 621 * , 219 ( 2005 ) ; h. kodama , prog . theor .
* 172 * , 11 ( 2008 ) ; a. n. aliev and o. delice , phys .
d * 79 * , 024013 ( 2009 ) ; h. kodama , r. a. konoplya and a. zhidenko , phys .
d * 79 * , 044003 ( 2009 ) ; k. murata , prog .
phys . * 121 * , 1099 ( 2009 ) ; n. uchikata , s. yoshida and t. futamase , phys .
d * 80 * , 084020 ( 2009 ) .
e. berti , v. cardoso and a. o. starinets , class .
* 26 * , 163001 ( 2009 ) . v. ferrari and b. mashhoon , phys . rev .
d * 30 * , 295 ( 1984 ) .
b. kol and e. sorkin , class .
* 21 * , 4793 ( 2004 ) .
d. anninos and t. hartman , arxiv:0910.4587 [ hep - th ] . | in physics stability of configuration ( solution equations is useful criterium for relevance unstable configurations likely not realizable represent intermediate stage in evolution system instability of interest understanding mechanism may grasp physics interest to predict other systems display similar instabilities or deeper understanding physics behind instability why system unstable fundamental principle behind instability in general relativity kerr family exhausts black hole solutions to electro - vac einstein equations kerr black holes are stable can describe astrophysical objects many instances of instabilities afflicting objects with event horizon gregory - laflamme ultra - spinning @xcite superradiant instabilities instabilities of higher - dimensional black holes in alternative theories konoplya and zhidenko studied small perturbations in vicinity of charged black hole in de sitter background results show spacetime dimensionality @xmath0 spacetime is unstable charge larger than threshold results surprising mechanism not understood set out to investigate instability understand better results summarized prove analytically existence of unstable modes for charge @xmath2 higher than thresholdnear - extremal regime solution unstable modes determining instability timescale analytically incursion understand physics focuses higher dimensional rnds geometry line element ds^2 = -f dt^2 + f^-1 dr^2 + r^2 d_n^2 @xmath3 line element @xmath4 sphere f=1-r^2-+ background electric field @xmath5 @xmath6 electric charge quantities @xmath7 @xmath2 related physical mass charge black hole @xmath8 cosmological constant spacetime dimensionality @xmath9 geometry three horizons black - hole cauchy horizon @xmath10 hole event horizon cosmological horizon @xmath12 @xmath13 positive zeroes @xmath14 set @xmath15 measure quantities event horizon @xmath16 2m=1+q^2- write fixed @xmath17 spacetime dimension @xmath1 regular event horizon charge @xmath2 smaller than @xmath18 maximum charge q_ext^2=.[qext gravitational perturbations couple electromagnetic field characterized by kodama ishibashi @xcitereduced two second order differential equations ^2-v_s tortoise coordinate @xmath19 potentials @xmath20 defined r f^-1 dr v_s = h_+&=&1-x=&m+(1+m)x quantities @xmath21 u+ -^3 n^3 3 n-2 ) n+1)^4 1+m 4 n^2 n+1)^2(n+1)(3n-2 ) 4 n^2+n-2 4 n+1 n-2 n-4 n+1 m+n^2 k -7 n^3 + 7 n^2 - 14 n+8 n+1 -4 m+3 n^2(n-2 ) ( 3 n-2 ) 64 m+16 n(n+2 ) -n^3 3 n-2 ) n+1)^4 1+m ) -4 n^2 n+1)^2 1+m )(n+1)(3 n-2 ) -n^2 4 ( n+1 ) 1+m ) n-2 n-4 n+1 m+n^2 k 2 n^2 - 3 n+4 ) m+n^2 n-2 ) n-4 ) n+1)k -16 n+1 -4 m+3 n^2(n-2 )+ 3 n ( n-4 ) m+3 n^2 ( n+1 ) ( n-2)k } x + + 64 m^3 + 16 n(n+2)m^2 k variables @xmath22 @xmath23 defined through x & & , yr^2 + ^2 m^2+,mk^2-n k quantity @xmath24 given by @xmath25 relations holds @xmath26 spacetime @xmath27 eigenvalues @xmath28 given by @xmath29 @xmath30 angular quantum number multipolarity field behavior @xmath31 parameters @xmath32 fix event horizon at @xmath15 cosmological horizon at @xmath33 @xmath34 modes three charges @xmath35 behavior potentials varies over range parameters fig . @xmath31 three values charge @xmath35 condition unstable mode proven by buell shadwick parametric region of instability in @xmath36 coordinates @xmath34 @xmath37 instability region depicted in figure spacetime - dimension @xmath1 compared with numerical results figure 4condition ( vcriterium ] ) describes numerical results @xmath38 section : ne ] extremality criterium too restrictive improved analysis refined criterium necessary describe range numerical results figure threshold ] clear higher - dimensional @xmath0 ) rnds black holes unstable for wide range parameters specialize near extremal rnds black hole spacetime cosmological horizon @xmath17 close to black hole horizon @xmath16 wave equation solved hypergeometric functions @xcite physical region of interest boundary conditions between @xmath16 and @xmath17 f ~2_b introduced surface gravity @xmath41 associated with event horizon at @xmath42 defined by relation @xmath43 near - extremal black holes approximately _ b ~(1-nq^2 ) invert relation @xmath44 tortoise to get r= . [ rtortoise ] substituting expression @xmath14 f = .approximation3 functional form potentials for wave propagation near extremal rnds black hole wave equation form + ^2-(,r)=0 waveequation2 ] with v_0= potential pshl - teller potential @xcite solutions studied hypergeometric type solved under boundary conditions : & ~ & e^-ir _ * , r _ * - + e^ir _ * r _ * boundary conditions impose non - trivial condition on @xmath45 @xcite satisfy both simultaneously quasinormal frequencies pshl - teller potential @xcite given by = _ b , j=0,1 solution ] threshold of instability for near - extremal rnds black holes cosmological event horizon coincide for @xmath34 modes prediction from analytic expression near extremal limit @xmath46 and criterium @xmath47 results compared to numerical results by kz instability present whenever @xmath48 negative threshold of stability in near - extremal regime given by = 0, expression for @xmath49 lengthyvalues charge @xmath50 condition in table i @xmath34 compared to prediction analysis section negativev criterium agreement excellent compare predictions against numerical results kz extremal limit @xmath51 kz notation agreement remarkable shown charged black holes backgrounds unstable wide range charge mass confirming previous studies stability properties extremal @xmath52 black hole unknown methods results inconclusive further investigations necessary result near - extremal regime investigate nature instability possible refinement concerns large-@xmath1 limit instability expression range parameters results techniques similar kol sorkin @xcite investigate stability properties near - extremal kerr - ds black holes conjectured holographic description @xcite thank roman konoplya alexander zhidenko correspondence sharing numerical results work partially funded by fundao para cincia tecnologia)-portugal projects ptdc / fis/64175/2006 fis/098025/2008 fis/098032/2008 cern / fp/109290/2009 r. emparan r. c. myers , jhep * 0309 * , 025 ( 2003 ) ; o j. c. dias p. figueras r. monteiro jsantos emparan arxiv:0907.2248 hep cardoso dias lemos yoshida phys 70 * 044039 2004 70 049903 2004 cardoso dias phys d 70 * 084011 2004 yoshida 0507 009 ( 2005 ) yoshida d 74 * 044008 ( 2006 ) cardoso lemos . 621 * 219 ( 2005 ) kodama 172 * 11 ( 2008 ) aliev delice phys . d 79 * 024013 ( 2009 ) kodama konoplya zhidenko d 79 * 044003 ( 2009 ) murata phys . 121 * 1099 ( 2009 ) n uchikata s yoshida futamase phys d 80 * 084020 ( 2009 ) berti v cardoso starinets class 26 * 163001 ( 2009 ) ferrari b mashhoon phys . d * 30 * 295 ( 1984 ) b. kol sorkin class 21 * 4793 ( 2004 ) d anninos t hartman arxiv:0910.4587 hep - th | 0.505912 | 3,513 | 1,839 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,790 | we have examined the head - on collision of two electrons in approximation of coherent states .
we have shown that the character of collision depends mainly on ratio of initial relative electron s momentum to momentum uncertainty of electrons .
when this ratio becomes greater then 1 , the coulomb interaction does not practically influence the scattering . | it is well known that solution of the electron - electron scattering problem , both classical and quantum , is generally reduced to finding the dependence of differential cross - section on the particles deflection angle . at that , the case of head - on collision
is principally ignored despite the fact that it is in these scatterings quantum properties of electrons reveal themselves maximally .
this is related first of all to their extreme mutual closing in , and therefore the manifestations of anti - symmetry of two - particle wave function become maximal . moreover , the influence of coulomb repulsion energy on two - particle system s behavior must be most significant . in this paper
we have used the coherent states as one - particle states and have examined the head - on collision of coherent electrons in triplet state in center - of - mass system .
let us assume that at an instant @xmath0 the first electron is in coherent state @xmath1 and the second one is in coherent state @xmath2 .
states @xmath3 and @xmath4 are eigenstates for operator @xmath5 with eigenvalues @xmath6 and @xmath7 correspondingly : @xmath8 and may be written as @xcite : @xmath9 where @xmath10 and @xmath11 are mean momentum and mean position of electrons at the instant @xmath0 , @xmath12 is uncertainty of every component of particle s momentum in coherent states @xmath13 : @xmath14 spatial part of two - particle state must be anti - symmetrical for triplet : @xmath15 where @xmath16 is overlapping integral , @xmath17 . at a given instant @xmath18 :
@xmath19 this state satisfies schroedinger equation : @xmath20 average value of kinetic energy in the state @xmath21 comprises three terms @xcite : @xmath22 the first term corresponds to free motion of classical particles , the second ( energy of configuration ) appears to be the contribution of momentum uncertainty ; the third one ( energy of correlation ) appears due to overlapping of two non - orthogonal one - particle states .
average value of coulomb repulsion energy in the triplet state @xmath23 @xmath24 is equal @xcite to : @xmath25 where @xmath26
let us assume , that at the instant @xmath0 the first electron is in coherent state @xmath1 and has mean momentum @xmath27 , and mean position @xmath28 ; the second electron is in coherent state @xmath2 with mean momentum and mean position @xmath29 , @xmath30 , respectively .
as far as we examine the case of collision , the initial momentum is negative for the first electron and positive for the second . as the solution of schroedinger equation in zero - order approximation we have used the state ( [ state ] ) in which @xmath31 and @xmath32 depend upon time according to hamilton equations : @xmath33 where @xmath34 in @xcite it is shown that @xmath35 can be considered as perturbation in wide enough range of @xmath31 and @xmath32 . since analytical solution of the system of equations ( [ h ] ) is not found we use its numerical solution . in fig.[f1 ]
the two typical phase trajectories are shown for head - on collision of two coherent electrons .
the distance between electrons and their momenta are in atomic units , initial distance is 5 a.u .
one can see that according to the ratio of initial relative momentum to momentum uncertainty of each electron , two principally different kinds of behavior of phase trajectories are possible . as long as the initial momentum of electrons is less than some critical momentum @xmath36 the effective deflection occurs .
when initial momentum of electrons exceeds @xmath36 the effective penetration is the case .
let us note that these two cases are experimentally indistinguishable due to identity of electrons . concerning the identity of particles the electron s _ return time _
@xmath18 may be used as an observable feature of collision process .
this term implies time span necessary to revert the distance between electrons to initial value .
for calculation of @xmath18 the plots of dependence of electron s coordinate upon time are used .
the example of such dependence is shown in fig.[f2 ] at the initial distance between electrons 5 a.u .
it should be noticed that a significant delay near the origin is possible both in the case of deflection and penetration .
the dependence of _ return time _
@xmath18 on initial momentum at the initial distance between particles 5 a.u .
is shown in fig.[f3 ] with boxes .
for comparison , analogous dependences for non - interacting particles ( dashed line ) and classical electrons ( solid line ) are given , and they almost coincide for large relative momenta .
fig.[f3 ] shows that dependence of _ return time _
@xmath18 on the initial momentum of electrons @xmath37 coincides with that for classical electrons when @xmath38 only . in the range @xmath39 the coulomb repulsion
may be neglected , though as fig.[f1 ] shows , this range corresponds to effective deflection . in the area @xmath40 a delay occurs . when initial momentum @xmath37 is large , @xmath41 , interaction may be ignored and phase trajectories accord with effective penetration .
the analysis of head - on collision of two coherent electrons has shown that the coulomb repulsion is considerable in the area of small values of relative momenta only . for
almost all values of initial relative momenta the system s behavior practically does not differ from classical .
essentially quantum scattering can be observed only in the area @xmath42 , when the distance between particles at the instant of stop is less than position uncertainty of electrons . | solution electron - scattering problem to dependence differential cross - section on particles deflection angle head - on collision ignored quantum properties reveal related to extreme mutual closing anti - symmetry two - particle wave function maximal influence coulomb repulsion energy on two - particle system behavior significant used coherent states as one - particle states examined head - on collision of electrons in triplet state center - of - mass system @xmath0 first electron in coherent state second coherent state @xmath2 states @xmath3 @xmath4 eigenstates for operator @xmath5 eigenvalues @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath9 mean momentum position of electrons @xmath0 @xmath12 uncertainty of particle s momentum in coherent states @xmath13 @xmath14 spatial part two - particle state anti - for triplet overlapping integral @xmath17@xmath18 @xmath19 state satisfies schroedinger equation @xmath20 average kinetic energy @xmath21 three terms @xcite : @xmath22 first corresponds free motion classical particles second energy configuration contribution momentum uncertainty third energy correlation overlapping non - orthogonal one - particle states coulomb repulsion energy triplet state @xmath23 @xmath24 equal to @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath0 first electron coherent state @xmath1 mean momentum mean position @xmath28 second coherent state @xmath2 mean momentum position @xmath29 @xmath30 collision initial momentum negative first electron positive second solution schroedinger equation zero - order approximation state @xmath31 @xmath32 depend time hamilton equations @xmath33 @xmath35 perturbation range @xmath31 @xmath32 analytical solution use numerical solution fig.[f1 ] two typical phase trajectories for head - on collision two coherent electrons distance electrons momenta atomic units initial distance 5 a.u . ratio initial relative momentum to momentum uncertainty electron two different phase trajectories possibleinitial momentum less than critical @xmath36 effective deflection occurs exceeds effective penetration cases indistinguishable due to identity electrons electron s _ return time _ @xmath18 observable feature collision process implies time span to revert distance to initial calculation @xmath18 plots of dependence of electron s coordinate time used in.[f2 ] at initial distance electrons 5 a.u significant delay near origin possible deflection and penetration dependence of _ return time _ @xmath18 on initial momentum shown in fig.[f3 ] analogous dependences for non - interacting particles classical electrons coincide for large relative momenta dependence _ return time _ @xmath18 on initial momentum @xmath37 coincides classical electrons when @xmath38 range @xmath39 coulomb repulsion neglected corresponds to effective deflection area @xmath40 delay occurs initial momentum @xmath37 large @xmath41 interaction ignored phase trajectories accord with effective penetration analysis head - on collision electrons coulomb repulsion considerable in small values relative momenta all system s behavior differ from classicalquantum scattering observed area @xmath42 distance particles stop less than position uncertainty electrons | 0.256993 | 1,234 | 618 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,791 | the complementarity between the quark and lepton mixing matrices is shown to provide a robust prediction for the neutrino mixing angle @xmath0 .
we obtain this prediction by first showing that the matrix @xmath1 , product of the ckm and pmns mixing matrices , may have a zero ( 1,3 ) entry which is favored by experimental data .
hence models with bimaximal or tribimaximal forms of the correlation matrix @xmath1 are quite possible . any theoretical model with a vanishing ( 1,3 ) entry of @xmath1 that is in agreement with quark data , solar , and atmospheric mixing angle leads to @xmath2 .
this value is consistent with the present 90% cl experimental upper limit .
pacs : 14.60.pq , 14.60.lm , 96.40.tv .
bhag c. chauhan@xmath3 , marco picariello@xmath4 , joo pulido@xmath3 , emilio torrente - lujan@xmath5 + _ @xmath6 centro de fsica terica das partculas ( cftp ) departamento de fsica , + instituto superior tcnico av .
rovisco pais , p-1049 - 001 lisboa , portugal + @xmath7 dipartimento di fisica , universit di lecce and infn - lecce , + via arnesano , ex collegio fiorini , i-73100 lecce , italia + @xmath8 dep .
de fisica , grupo de fisica teorica , univ
. de murcia , murcia , spain . _ | recent neutrino experiments confirm that the pontecorvo - maki - nakagawa - sakata ( pmns ) @xcite lepton mixing matrix @xmath9 contains large mixing angles .
for example the atmospheric mixing @xmath10 is compatible with @xmath11 @xcite , and the solar mixing @xmath12 is @xmath13 @xcite . these results should be compared with the third lepton mixing angle @xmath0 which is very small and even compatible with zero @xcite , and with the quark mixing angles in the @xmath14 matrix @xcite .
the disparity that nature indicates between quark and lepton mixing angles has been viewed in terms of a quark - lepton complementarity ( qlc ) @xcite which can be expressed in the relations _ 12^pmns+_12^ckm45^ ; _
23^pmns+_23^ckm45^. possible consequences of qlc have been investigated in the literature @xcite and in particular a simple correspondence between the @xmath9 and @xmath14 matrices has been proposed @xcite and analyzed in terms of a correlation matrix @xcite . the correlation matrix @xmath1 is simply defined as the product of the ckm and pmns matrices , @xmath15 , and efforts have been done to obtain the _ most favorite _ pattern for the matrix @xmath1 @xcite .
unitarity then implies @xmath16 and one may ask where do the large lepton mixings come from ?
is this information implicit in the form of the @xmath1 matrix ?
this question has been widely investigated in the literature , but its answer is still open ( see our section * 2 * ) .
furthermore in some grand unification theories ( guts ) the direct qlc correlation between the @xmath17 and the @xmath18 mixing matrix can be obtained . in this class of models ,
the @xmath1 matrix is determined by the heavy majorana neutrino mass matrix @xcite .
moreover as long as quarks and leptons are inserted in the same representation of the underlying gauge group , we need to include in our definition of @xmath1 arbitrary but non trivial phases between the quark and lepton matrices .
hence we will generalize the relation @xmath15 to @xmath19 where the quantity @xmath20 is a diagonal matrix @xmath21 and the three phases @xmath22 are free parameters ( in the sense that they are not restricted by present experimental evidence ) .
the magnitude disparity between the lepton mixing angle @xmath0 and the other two mixings is a rather striking fact . in this paper
we carry out the investigation of the correlation matrix @xmath1 based on eq .
( [ eq : fund ] ) and prove that it is a zero texture of @xmath1 , namely @xmath23 , that implies a small value for @xmath0 with a sharp prediction @xmath24 we use the wolfenstein parameterization for @xmath14 @xcite in its unitary form @xcite and parameterize @xmath9 with the standard phases and mixing angles . as a zero order approximation
we start inserting by hand the central values of the lepton mixing angles and ckm parameters . owing to the uncertainty in the experimental value for @xmath0 , the possible range for the ( 1,3 ) entry of matrix @xmath1 may or may not include zero
. for example using @xmath25 the ( 1,3 ) entry range does not include zero in accordance with eq .
( 23 ) in ref .
@xcite . for other choices of @xmath0
a vanishing ( 1,3 ) entry is quite possible , as will be seen in section * [ sec : vm]*. it is possible to include bimaximal and tribimaximal forms of the correlation matrix @xmath1 in models with renormalization effects @xcite that are relevant , however , only in particular cases with large @xmath26 @xmath27 and with quasi degenerate neutrino masses @xcite .
the conclusion for matrix @xmath1 is that the possibility of a bimaximal form , or a tribimaximal one is completely open . so in other words , the correlation between the matrices @xmath14 and @xmath9 is rather nontrivial .
the investigation we perform for the @xmath1 matrix starts from the fundamental equation @xmath28 and uses the experimental ranges and constraints on lepton mixing angles .
we resort to a monte carlo simulation with two - sided gaussian distributions around the mean values of the observables .
the input information on @xmath0 is taken from the analysis of ref .
@xcite which uses neutrino data only .
the paper is organized as follows : in section * [ sec : vm ] * we study the numerical ranges of @xmath1 entries with the aid of a monte carlo simulation , emphasizing on specific points of the experimental data .
we will show that the vanishing of the @xmath29 entry is favored by the data analysis . in section * [ sec : pmns ] * we present the matter from a different point of view : we start from a zero @xmath29 @xmath1 entry ( e.g. a bimaximal or tribimaximal matrix ) we derive the consequent prediction for the @xmath9 lepton mixing matrix through u_pmns=(u_ckm)^-1v_m and the corresponding one for @xmath0 in eq . ( [ eq : prediction ] )
. finally we present a summary and our conclusions .
in this section we investigate the order of magnitude of the @xmath1 matrix entries concentrating in particular in the ( 1,3 ) entry and the important mixing angle @xmath30 to which it is directly related .
we then explicitly study the allowed values of the @xmath1 angles , finally concluding that @xmath31 is the value most favored by the data .
we will be using the wolfenstein parameterization @xcite of the @xmath14 matrix in its unitary form @xcite where one has the relation [ ckm ] _
12^ckm=_23^ckm = a^2 _ 13^ckme^-^ckm = a ^3(- ) to all orders in @xmath32 .
the lepton mixing matrix @xmath9 is parameterized in the usual way as u_pmns= u_23u_13^u_12_m . here
@xmath33 and @xmath34 are diagonal matrices containing the dirac and majorana cp violating phases , respectively @xmath35 and @xmath36 , so that [ pmns ] u_pmns= in grand unification models where quarks and leptons belong to the same representation of the gauge group , the quark and lepton fields must acquire different phases once their symmetry is broken . hence one should take into account this phase mismatch at low energy associated with the form of the ckm and pmns matrices ( [ ckm ] , [ pmns ] ) . to this end
we introduced the diagonal matrix @xmath20 [ omega ] = diag(e^_1,e^_2,e^_3 ) in the commonly used relation @xmath37 .
this is therefore generalized to [ eq : thvm ] v_m&=&u_ckmu_pmns .
we use for the observed ckm mixing parameters the values @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath41 , and for the pmns mixing angles the values @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath25 @xcite . for the @xmath20 phases we resort a monte carlo simulation with flat distributions in the interval @xmath44 $ ] .
we then get the following range of values for the elements of the @xmath1 correlation matrix : [ eq : xing ] v_m= ( ) .
these values are in good agreement with @xcite .
the small differences are due to the fact that we use the full mixing matrix given in eq .
( [ ckm ] ) and not the parameterization given in eq .
( 21 ) of ref .
notice that the @xmath29 entry of the matrix @xmath1 above can not be zero , so @xmath1 can not be bimaximal , i.e. of the form , nor tribimaximal , namely , where only the absolute values have been considered .
the result of eq .
( [ eq : xing ] ) however depends on the assumption about the values used for the mixing angles . for example if we use a different value for @xmath0 , namely @xmath45 ( see ref .
@xcite or our eq .
( [ bestfit2 ] ) for the allowed range of @xmath0 ) , we get v_m= ( ) . for these values
the result is in agreement with the statement that @xmath1 has the @xmath29 entry equal to zero .
it is clear that we need a better investigation of the situation before establishing what are the allowed values of the entries of the correlation matrix @xmath1 that can be deduced from the experimental data .
we next investigate the important entry @xmath29 as it overwhelmingly affects the @xmath0 prediction as will be seen in section * [ sec : pmns]*. at first non trivial orders in @xmath32 we have [ th13vm_a ] ^2_13^v_m&= & |(1- ) e^(_1 -_2- ) _ 13^pmns+_23^pmns _ 13^pmns + o(^3)|^2 it is seen from this expression that the first two terms can cancel each other implying a vanishing @xmath29 entry of the @xmath1 matrix . in order to better investigate this issue we plot in fig.[fig : f1 ] the quantity @xmath48 as a function of @xmath49 .
all other observables are fixed at their best fit points @xcite and we allowed the dirac lepton phase @xmath50 , the majorana ones @xmath51 and @xmath52 , and the unphysical phases of @xmath20 to vary in the interval @xmath53 $ ] with a flat distribution .
as shown in the figure , for the central value of @xmath0 given in @xcite the entry ( 1,3 ) of @xmath1 can not be zero .
however there is a small region @xmath54 for which @xmath55 can be zero .
this fact has the very important consequence of providing a sharp prediction for the unknown mixing angle @xmath0 .
we will investigate this point in detail in the section * [ sec : pmns]*. [ [ sec : thetavm ] ] the allowed values for @xmath56 , @xmath57 , and @xmath48 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ here we further investigate the possibility of @xmath1 to be bimaximal or tribimaximal using the fundamental equation ( [ eq : thvm ] ) .
we start with a monte carlo simulation for the @xmath58 parameters , the @xmath59 mixing angles , the @xmath20 and cp phases . | neutrino experiments confirm pontecorvo - maki nakagawa - sakata @xcite lepton mixing matrix @xmath9 contains large mixing angles atmospheric mixing @xmath10 compatible with @xmath11 solar mixing @xmath13 results compared with third lepton mixing angle @xmath0 small compatible with zero quark mixing angles in @xmath14 matrix disparity between quark lepton mixing angles viewed quark - lepton complementarity qlc ) expressed in relations _ 12^pmns+_12^ckm45^ ; 23^pmns+_23^ckm45^ consequences of qlc investigated correspondence between @xmath9 @xmath14 matrices proposed correlation matrix correlation matrix @xmath1 product of ckm pmns matrices efforts obtain favorite pattern for matrix @xmath1 unitarity implies @xmath16 large lepton mixings from ? implicit in @xmath1 matrix answer open unification theories direct qlc correlation between @xmath17 @xmath18 mixing matrix obtained @xmath1 matrix determined by heavy majorana neutrino mass matrix @xcitequarks leptons inserted gauge group include definition @xmath1 phases between quark lepton matrices generalize relation @xmath15 to @xmath19 quantity @xmath20 diagonal matrix @xmath21 three phases @xmath22 free parameters not restricted by experimental evidence magnitude disparity between lepton mixing angle @xmath0 other two mixings striking investigation correlation matrix @xmath1 zero texture of @xmath1 @xmath23 implies small value for @xmath0 sharp prediction @xmath24 use wolfenstein parameterization for @xmath14 parameterize @xmath9 standard phases mixing angles zero order approximation inserting central values lepton mixing angles ckm parameters uncertainty experimental value @xmath0 range ( 1,3 ) entry matrix @xmath1 include zero @xmath25 1,3 entry range include zero eq . 23 ) other choices @xmath0 vanishing ( 1,3 ) entry possible possible include bimaximal tribimaximal forms of correlation matrix @xmath1 in models renormalization effects @xcite relevant cases with large @xmath26 @xmath27 quasi degenerate neutrino masses @xciteconclusion for matrix @xmath1 possibility bimaximal or tribimaximal open correlation between matrices @xmath14 and @xmath9 nontrivial investigation for @xmath1 matrix starts from equation @xmath28 uses experimental ranges constraints on lepton mixing angles to monte carlo simulation two - sided gaussian distributions mean values observables input information on @xmath0 from analysis ref @xcite neutrino data paper organized section * study numerical ranges of @xmath1 entries monte carlo simulation experimental data vanishing of @xmath29 entry favored by data analysis section * different start from zero @xmath29 @xmath1 entry bimaximal or tribimaximal matrix derive prediction for @xmath9 lepton mixing matrix through u_pmns=(u_ckm)^-1v_m @xmath0 in eq present summary conclusions investigate order of magnitude of @xmath1 matrix entries ( 1,3 ) entry mixing angle @xmath30 related study allowed values of @xmath1 angles @xmath31 value favored by datausing wolfenstein parameterization @xcite @xmath14 matrix unitary form relation [ ckm ] _ 12^ckm=_23^ckm = a^2 _ 13^ckme^-^ckm = a ^3(- ) orders @xmath32 lepton mixing matrix @xmath9 parameterized u_pmns= u_23u_13^u_12_m @xmath33 @xmath34 diagonal matrices dirac majorana cp violating phases pmns u_pmns= unification models quark lepton fields different phases symmetry broken phase mismatch low energy ckm pmns matrices introduced diagonal matrix @xmath20 [ omega ] = diag(e^_1,e^_2,e^_3 ) relation @xmath37 generalized [ eq : thvm ] v_m&=&u_ckmu_pmns observed ckm mixing parameters values @xmath38 pmns mixing angles @xmath42 @xmath20 phases monte carlo simulation flat distributions interval @xmath44 range values elements @xmath1 correlation matrix [ eq : xing ] v_m= ( ) values agreement @xcite small differences due full mixing matrix eq [ ckm ] ) not parameterization in eq . 21 ) @xmath29 entry of matrix @xmath1 not be zero @xmath1 not bimaximal nor tribimaximal absolute values result of eq . depends on values for mixing angles different value for @xmath0 @xmath45 @xcite eq . bestfit2 ] allowed range @xmath0 get v_m= ( ) result with @xmath1 has @xmath29 entry equal to zero need better investigation before establishing allowed values of entries correlation matrix @xmath1 experimental data investigate entry @xmath29 affects @xmath0 prediction in section * pmns]* non trivial orders in @xmath32 [ th13vm_a ] ^2_13^v_m&= _ 13^pmns+_23^pmns _ 13^pmns + o(^3)|^2 first two terms can cancel vanishing @xmath29 entry of @xmath1 matrix plot in fig. f1 ] quantity @xmath48 as function of @xmath49observables fixed at best points @xcite allowed dirac lepton phase @xmath50 majorana ones @xmath51 @xmath52 unphysical phases @xmath20 vary interval @xmath53 flat distribution central value @xmath0 @xcite entry ( 1,3 ) @xmath1 zero small region @xmath54 @xmath55 can be zero sharp prediction unknown mixing angle @xmath0 investigate section sec : pmns thetavm allowed values for @xmath56 @xmath48 investigate possibility @xmath1 bimaximal or tribimaximal using fundamental equation thvm start monte carlo simulation for @xmath58 parameters @xmath59 mixing angles @xmath20 cp phases | 0.351766 | 2,417 | 1,293 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,797 | we discuss the first passage time problem in the semi - infinite interval , for homogeneous stochastic markov processes with lvy stable jump length distributions @xmath0 ( @xmath1 ) , namely , lvy flights ( lfs ) .
in particular , we demonstrate that the method of images leads to a result , which violates a theorem due to sparre andersen , according to which an arbitrary continuous and symmetric jump length distribution produces a first passage time density ( fptd ) governed by the universal long - time decay @xmath2 .
conversely , we show that for lfs the direct definition known from gaussian processes in fact defines the probability density of first arrival , which for lfs differs from the fptd .
our findings are corroborated by numerical results .
lvy flights ( lfs ) and lvy walks ( lws ) are the prime example in the investigation of non - standard transport processes whose stationary solution does not converge towards the boltzmann form @xcite .
being subject to the generalised central limit theorem @xcite , lfs correspond to a markov process in which extremely long excursions can occur with appreciable probability , whereas in lws long excursions are penalised through a time cost introduced via a spatiotemporal coupling @xcite .
applications of lfs and lws range from the famed flight of an albatross @xcite , the spreading of spider - monkeys @xcite , or the grazing patterns of bacteria @xcite , over economical data @xcite to molecular collisions @xcite and plasmas @xcite . despite their broad usage , the detailed behaviour of even the simpler , uncoupled lf processes , on which we concentrate in the following , in external potentials and under non - trivial boundary conditions is still not fully explored .
thus , there have recently been discovered bifurcations between multimodal states of the probability density function ( pdf ) of lfs in steeper than harmonic external fields , in whose presence also the variance becomes finite @xcite , and rich band structures have been reported for lfs in periodic potentials @xcite . of particular interest in random processes is the first passage time density ( fptd ) @xcite .
for lfs , the fptd was determined through the method of images on a finite domain in reference @xcite , and with similar methods in reference @xcite .
these methods lead to results for the fptd in the semi - infinite domain , whose long - time behaviour explicitly depends on the lvy index @xmath3 .
in contrast , a theorem due to sparre andersen proves that for any discrete - time random walk process starting at @xmath4 with each step chosen from a continuous , symmetric but otherwise arbitrary distribution , the fptd asymptotically decays as @xmath5 with the number @xmath6 of steps @xcite , being _ fully independent _ of the index of the lf , i.e. , universal . in the case of a markov process
, the continuous time analogue of the sparre andersen result reads @xmath7 the analogous universality was proved by frisch and frisch for the special case in which an absorbing boundary is placed at the location of the starting point of the lf at @xmath8 @xcite , and numerically corroborated by klafter and zumofen @xcite . in the following ,
we demonstrate that the method of images is generally inconsistent with the universality of the fptd , and therefore can not be applied to solve fptd - problems for lfs .
we also show that for lfs the fptd differs from the pdf for first arrival .
let us start by recalling that an unbiased lf can be defined through the space - fractional diffusion equation for the pdf @xmath9 @xcite @xmath10 where we define the fractional derivative @xmath11 by its fourier transform .
( here and in the following , we restrict ourselves to @xmath12 . ) in position space , the fractional derivative is defined in terms of the convolution ( see @xcite for the case @xmath13 ) @xmath14 equivalently , lfs can be described in terms of continuous time random walks with long - tailed jump length distributions @xmath0 @xcite .
the associated pdf @xmath9 for natural boundary conditions ( @xmath15 ) with initial condition @xmath16 is the lvy stable law @xmath17 @xcite . in fourier - laplace space
@xcite , this pdf corresponds to @xmath18 .
a characteristic of lfs is the divergence of the variance of both @xmath9 and @xmath19 . equipping equation ( [ fde ] ) with a @xmath20-sink of strength @xmath21
, we obtain the diffusion - reaction equation for the non - normalised density function @xmath22 , @xmath23 i.e. , @xmath21 is the negative time derivative of the survival probability . by definition of the sink term , @xmath21 is the pdf of _ first arrival _ :
once a random walker arrives at the sink , it is annihilated . by solving equation ( [ heat ] ) through standard methods ( determining the homogeneous and inhomogeneous solutions ) , it is straightforward to calculate the solution @xmath24 in terms of the propagator @xmath25 of equation ( [ fde ] ) with initial condition @xmath26 yielding @xmath27/\left(s+d|k|^ { \alpha}\right)$ ] , from which , in turn , we find that @xmath21 satisfies the chain rule ( @xmath28 implicitly depending on @xmath29 ) @xmath30 which corresponds to the laplace space relation @xmath31 . equation ( [ mfpt ] ) is well - known and for any sufficiently well - behaved continuum diffusion process is commonly employed to define the fptd @xcite . for gaussian processes with propagator @xmath32\right)$ ]
, one obtains by direct integration of the diffusion equation with appropriate boundary condition the fptd @xcite @xmath33 including the asymptotic behaviour @xmath34 for @xmath35 . in this gaussian case , the quantity @xmath21 is equivalent to the fptd . from a random walk perspective
, this is due to the fact that individual steps are of the same increment , and the jump length statistics therefore ensures that the walker can not hop across the sink in a long jump without actually hitting the sink and being absorbed .
this behaviour becomes drastically different for lvy jump length statistics : there , the particle can easily cross the sink in a long jump . thus , before eventually being absorbed , it can pass by the sink location numerous times , and therefore the statistics of the first arrival will be different from the one of the first passage .
in fact , with @xmath36 , we find @xmath37 by use of the de moivre identity @xmath38 . with @xmath39 and @xmath40
we obtain the limiting form @xmath41 where @xmath42 .
we note that the same result is obtained by the exact expressions for @xmath43 and @xmath44 in terms of fox @xmath45-functions and systematic expansion @xcite .
the inverse laplace transform of the small @xmath46-behaviour ( [ limit3 ] ) can be obtained by completing ( [ limit3 ] ) to an exponential , and then computing the laplace inversion by the identification @xmath47 $ ] with the fox @xmath45-function @xcite , for which the exact laplace inversion can be performed @xcite .
finally , a series expansion of this result leads to the long-@xmath48 form @xmath49 with @xmath50/2\right)\sin^2(\pi/\alpha)/(\pi^2(\alpha-1))$ ] .
clearly , in the gaussian limit , the required asymptotic form @xmath51 for the fptd is consistently recovered , whereas in the general case the result ( [ limit4 ] ) is slower than in the universal fptd behaviour in equation ( [ universal ] ) , as it should as the @xmath20-trap used in equation ( [ heat ] ) to define the first arrival for lfs is weaker than the absorbing wall used to properly define the fptd . for lfs
, the pdf for first arrival thus scales like ( [ limit4 ] ) ( i.e. , it explicitly depends on the index @xmath3 of the underlying lvy process ) , and , as shown below , it
_ differs _ from the corresponding fptd .
( 10,7.2 ) ( 1.8,8 ) before calculating this fptd , we first demonstrate the validity of equation ( [ limit4 ] ) by means of a simulation the results of which are shown in figure [ fig2 ] .
random jumps with lf jump length statistics are performed , and a particle is removed when it hits a certain interval of width @xmath52 around the sink ; for our simulations we found an optimum value @xmath53 .
as seen in figure [ fig2 ] ( note that we plot @xmath54 ! ) and for analogous results not shown here , relation ( [ limit4 ] ) is nicely fulfilled for all @xmath12 , whereas for larger @xmath52 , the slope increases .
the proper dynamical formulation of an lf on the semi - infinite interval with an absorbing boundary condition at @xmath55 , and thereby the determination of the fptd , has to make sure that in terms of above random walk picture jumps across the sink are forbidden .
this can be consistently achieved by setting @xmath56 on the left semi - axis , i.e. , actually removing the particle when it crosses the point @xmath55 .
this formally corresponds to the modified dynamical equation @xmath57 in which the fractional integral is truncated to the semi - infinite interval .
after laplace transformation and integrating over @xmath58 twice , one obtains @xmath59 where @xmath60 is the fptd and the kernel @xmath61 .
this equation is formally of the wiener - hopf type of the first kind @xcite .
after some manipulations similar to those applied in reference @xcite , we arrive at the asymptotic expression @xmath62 , where @xmath63 , in accordance with the universal behaviour ( [ universal ] ) and with the findings in reference @xcite .
thus , the dynamic equation ( [ neu ] ) consistently phrases the fptd problem for lfs .
we note that due to the truncation of the fractional integral it was not possible to modify the well - established grnwald - letnikov scheme @xcite to numerically solve equation ( [ neu ] ) with enough computational efficiency to numercially obtain the direct solution for @xmath22 .
however , to corroborate the validity of the sparre anderson - universality , we perform a simulation of an lf in the presence of an absorbing wall , i.e. , random jumps with lf jump length statistics are performed along the right semi - axis , and a particle is removed when it jumps across the origin to the left semi - axis .
results of such a detailed random walk study are displayed in figures [ fig ] and [ fig1 ] .
the expected universal @xmath64 scaling is nicely obtained for various initial conditions and @xmath3 . clearly , the scaling for the first arrival as well as the image method - fptd derived below are significantly different .
( 10,7.2 ) ( 0.94,-1.8 ) ( 10,7.2 ) ( 0.94,-1.8 ) we now demonstrate that the method of images produces a result , which is neither consistent with the universal behaviour of the fptd ( [ universal ] ) nor with the behaviour of the pdf of first arrival ( [ limit4 ] ) , given the initial condition @xmath65 , the solution @xmath66 for the absorbing boundary value problem with the analogous dirichlet condition @xmath67 according to the method of images is given via the difference @xcite @xmath68 in terms of the free propagator @xmath25 , i.e. , a _ negative _ image solution originating at @xmath69 balances the probability flux across the absorbing boundary .
the corresponding pseudo - fptd is then calculated in the same way as in equation ( [ surv ] ) . for the image solution in fourier - laplace space ,
we obtain @xmath70/\left(s+d|k|^{\alpha } \right),\ ] ] for a process which starts at @xmath71 and takes place in the right half space . in laplace space ,
the image method - fptd becomes @xmath72 after some transformations , we arrive at @xmath73.\ ] ] in the limit of small @xmath46 , this expression reduces to @xmath74 , with @xmath75 . following the same procedure
as outlined above , we find the long-@xmath48 form @xmath76 for the image method fptd . in the gaussian limit @xmath77 , expression ( [ limit2 ] )
produces @xmath78 , in accordance to equation ( [ bmfpt ] ) .
conversely , for general @xmath12 , @xmath79 according to equation ( [ limit2 ] ) would decay faster than @xmath80 .
the method of images breaks down for lfs due to their special non - local nature , displayed by the integrals in equations ( [ fde ] ) and ( [ riesz ] ) , and ( [ neu ] ) , namely having a long - tailed jump length distribution .
this leads to leapovers beyond the absorbing boundary .
the method of images is expected to work when the boundary is also a turning poing of the trajectory , as actually happens for nearest neighbours random walks , or the wiener process .
qualitatively , the following argument may be brought forth in favour of the observed universality of the lf - fptd : the long - time decay is expected to be governed by short - distance jump events , corresponding to the central region of very small jump lengths for the lvy stable jump length distribution .
but this region is , apart from a prefactor , indistinguishable from the gaussian distribution , and therefore the long - time behaviour should in fact be the same for any continuous jump length distribution @xmath19 .
in fact , the universal law ( [ universal ] ) can only be modified in the presence of non - markov effects such as broad waiting time processes or spatiotemporally coupled walks @xcite . in terms of the special case covered by the theorem of frisch and frisch @xcite ,
in which the absorbing boundary coincides with the initial condition , we can understand the general situation for finite @xmath71 , as in the long - time limit , the distance @xmath29 becomes negligible in comparison to the diffusion length @xmath81 : therefore the asymptotic behaviour is necessarily governed by the same universality .
concluding , we demonstrated that the method of images , which has been developed a powerful tool in gaussian diffusion also beyond the homogeneous case @xcite and in the presence of long - tailed waiting times @xcite , fails for lf processes , leading to a false result for the fptd .
moreover , we showed that for such broad jump length statistics , the pdf of first arrival at a point differs from the fptd .
we also provided a framework in terms of a truncated fractional diffusion equation to solve the fptd problem for an lf .
this study is expected to significantly contribute to the understanding of the , at instances , non - trivial behaviour of lfs .
we are happy to acknowledge discussions with igor sokolov .
we also acknowledge financial support through the intas project 00 - 0847 from the european commission . | 0.000927 | 0 | 0 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. | ||
195,798 | the prompt emission of gamma - ray bursts ( hereafter grbs ) probably comes from a highly relativistic wind which converts its kinetic energy into radiation via the formation of shocks within the wind itself .
such `` internal shocks '' can occur if the wind is generated with a highly non uniform distribution of the lorentz factor @xmath0 .
taking into account such a variable distribution of @xmath0 , we estimate the expected thermal emission of the relativistic wind when it becomes transparent . we compare this emission ( temporal profile + spectrum ) to the emission produced by the internal shocks . in most cases
we predict a rather bright thermal emission that could easily be detected .
this favors acceleration mechanisms for the wind where the main energy reservoir is under magnetic rather than thermal form .
such scenarios can produce thermal x - ray precursors comparable to those observed by ginga and watch / granat .
# 1_#1 _ # 1_#1 _ = # 1 1.25 in .125 in .25 in | we do not discuss here the nature of the source responsible for the initial energy release leading to the grb .
we assume that a relativistic wind has emerged at radius @xmath1 with a variable distribution of the lorentz factor @xmath2 ( with @xmath3 ) .
the energy and mass injection rates are @xmath4 and @xmath5 .
the wind production lasts for a total duration @xmath6 ( total ejected mass : @xmath7 ) . at @xmath8 ,
the wind is still optically thick , whereas at the radius @xmath9 where the internal shock phase starts , it has to be already transparent , as indicated by the dominant non - thermal nature of the observed grb spectra .
the radius at which each layer of the relativistic wind becomes transparent can be estimated ( see daigne & mochkovitch 2002 ) : photons emitted by a layer at @xmath10 will successively cross all the layers emitted earlier by the source before they can escape from the relativistic wind at radius @xmath11 : as @xmath12 , we usually have @xmath13 .
the optical depth of a layer at radius @xmath10 is approximatively given by @xmath14 , where the opacity @xmath15 is mainly due to the ambient electrons ( thomson opacity ) .
therefore the photospheric radius ( @xmath16 ) of the layer is given by : @xmath17 .
1 shows this radius for an example where @xmath18 , @xmath19 and the lorentz factor is given in the same figure .
the photospheric luminosity and temperature of each layer can be estimated in the context of the fireball model ( see e.g. piran 1999 ) : @xmath20 where the initial fireball temperature is given by @xmath21 ( @xmath22 is the mass of the central black hole in units of @xmath23 ) . the emitted photons will closely follow a planck distribution , so that the phostopheric emission leads to a spectrum and a count rate in an energy band @xmath24 $ ] : @xmath25 where @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
the internal shock luminosity is assumed to be @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the efficiency for the conversion of kinetic energy into @xmath31-rays by internal shocks .
this leads to a spectrum and a count rate in energy band @xmath24 $ ] given by @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the observed peak energy of the internal shock spectrum ( @xmath34 ) and @xmath35 is the usual band spectral shape ( with @xmath36 ) , characterized by a low and high - energy slope @xmath37 and @xmath38 ( band et al .
2 shows the spectrum and the time profile obtained in the example of fig . 1 including both the internal shock and the photospheric emission ( with @xmath39 , @xmath40 and @xmath41 ) .
the internal shock emission is computed with the model developped by daigne & mochkovitch ( 1998 ) .
the global observed peak energy of the non - thermal photons is 200 kev .
[ fig : resultat1 ]
the ratio of the photospheric over internal shock count rates is given by : @xmath42 this expression indicates that the photospheric thermal emission is usually dominant in the x- and @xmath31-ray bands ( see fig .
2 ) ! this is clearly in disagreement with the observations showing that the grb spectrum is non - thermal in this spectral range . from eq . 4 ,
there are two possible solutions to recover grbs dominated by the non - thermal internal shock component : ( i ) increase of @xmath30 , i.e. more efficient internal shocks .
however , our calculations show that even for @xmath30 close to unity , the thermal component would still be easily detectable ; ( ii ) decrease of @xmath43 and @xmath44 , i.e. a less hot and bright photosphere , compared to the prediction of the standard fireball model . if we define @xmath45 as the fraction of the energy released by the source which is initially under thermal form , the photospheric luminosity and temperature are given by : @xmath46 so that the expression of @xmath47 in eq .
4 has now to be multiplied by a factor @xmath48 . in the standard fireball model
@xmath49 but much smaller values can be expected if a large fraction of the energy realeased by the source is initially under magnetic form .
3 shows exactly the same example as fig . 1 ,
the only difference being that the photospheric emission has been computed with @xmath50 .
a non - thermal burst is recovered in agreement with the observations .
a small thermal precursor is still present in x - rays
. it can be more intense for intermediate values of @xmath45 , so that the photospheric emission predicted in this case could explain the x - ray precursors observed in a few grbs .
we have computed the photospheric thermal emission of a relativistic wind with a highly variable initial distribution of lorentz factor .
we find that : ( 1 ) the photosphere predicted in the standard fireball model for grbs is usually too hot and luminous .
the thermal photospheric emission dominates the non - thermal internal shock emission , even for large internal shock efficiencies .
this is in disagreement with the observations .
( 2 ) a less luminous photosphere is expected if the energy released by the source is initially injected mainly under magnetic rather than thermal form . in this case , we recover grb spectra and temporal profiles dominated by the non - thermal internal shock emission .
( 3 ) we then obtain x - ray precursors which may correspond to the precursor activity observed in a few grbs by ginga and watch / granat . these resultats are presented in more details in daigne & mochkovitch ( 2002 ) . | discuss source initial energy release grb assume relativistic wind emerged at radius @xmath1 variable distribution lorentz factor @xmath2 @xmath3 energy mass injection rates @xmath4 @xmath5 wind production lasts total duration @xmath6 ejected mass @xmath7 ) at @xmath8 wind optically thick radius @xmath9 internal shock phase starts transparent non - thermal nature grb spectra radius layer wind transparent estimated daigne mochkovitch 2002 photons emitted layer at @xmath10 cross layers before escape at radius @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 optical depth layer at radius @xmath10 given by @xmath14 opacity @xmath15 due to ambient electrons thomson opacity photospheric radius @xmath16 layer given by @xmath17 shows radius @xmath18 @xmath19 lorentz factor same figure photospheric luminosity temperature each layer estimated fireball model piran 1999 ) initial fireball temperature by @xmath21 @xmath22 mass central black hole in units @xmath23emitted photons follow planck distribution phostopheric emission leads to spectrum count rate energy band @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 internal shock luminosity @xmath29 @xmath30 efficiency conversion kinetic energy into @xmath31-rays by internal shocks leads to spectrum count rate energy band @xmath24 @xmath32 @xmath33 peak energy internal shock spectrum @xmath35 usual band spectral shape @xmath36 low high - energy slope @xmath37 @xmath38 shows spectrum time profile fig . 1 including internal shock photospheric emission @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 internal shock emission computed with model daigne & mochkovitch 1998 global peak energy of non - thermal photons is 200 kev ratio photospheric over internal shock count rates by @xmath42 photospheric thermal emission dominant in x- @xmath31-ray bands disagreement with observations grb spectrum non - thermal range two solutions to recover grbs dominated by non - thermal internal shock component increase of @xmath30 efficient shocks thermal component detectable decrease of @xmath43 @xmath44less hot bright photosphere compared to standard fireball model define @xmath45 fraction energy under thermal form photospheric luminosity temperature given by @xmath46 expression of @xmath47 in eq 4 multiplied by @xmath48 standard fireball model @xmath49 smaller values expected if energy under magnetic form same example 1 photospheric emission computed with @xmath50 non - thermal burst recovered observations small thermal precursor present in x - rays intense for intermediate values of @xmath45 explain x - ray precursors in grbs computed photospheric thermal emission of relativistic wind with variable initial distribution lorentz factor photosphere standard fireball model for grbs too hot luminous thermal photospheric emission dominates non - thermal internal shock emission disagreement with observations less luminous photosphere if energy under magnetic thermal form recover grb spectra temporal profiles dominated by non - thermal internal shock emission obtain x - ray precursors correspond to activity observed in grbs by ginga watch granat resultats in daigne & mochkovitch ( 2002 ) | 0.187787 | 1,282 | 672 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,820 | in the present work we study gut coleman - weinberg inflation with a nonminimal coupling to gravity . in this kind of model one
usually finds that either the nonminimal coupling to gravity is large @xmath0 or the inflaton self - coupling is unnaturally small @xmath1 .
we have shown that the model is in agreement with the recent results from planck for natural values of the couplings .
inflation @xcite has become the standard paradigm for the early universe , because it solves some outstanding problems present in the standard hot big - bang cosmology , such as the flatness and horizon problems , the problem of unwanted relics , such as magnetic monopoles , and produces the cosmological fluctuations for the formation of the structure that we observe today .
the spectacular cmb data , first from the wmap satellite @xcite and recently from planck @xcite , have strengthen the inflationary idea , since the observations indicate an _ almost _ scale - free spectrum of gaussian adiabatic density fluctuations , just as predicted by simple models of inflation . however , inflation is not a theory yet , as we do nt know how to integrate it with ideas from particle physics .
the brout - englert - higgs mechanism @xcite in the framework of the standard model breaks electroweak symmetry , gives masses to the charged fermions and the massive gauge bosons , and predicts the existence of the higgs boson .
the recent lhc discovery of the higgs boson @xcite completed the particle spectrum predicted by the standard model , and indicates for the first time that fundamental scalar particles exist in nature .
therefore , it is a natural thing to assume that inflation is driven by the higgs boson .
although the higgs potential is not suitable for a viable inflationary model , the presence of a higgs non - minimal coupling to gravity can change things to the better .
a large value of the non - minimal coupling @xmath2 is required , and given the uncertainties in the top quark mass and the strong coupling constant the model is still allowed @xcite .
sadly , that large value of @xmath3 questions the validity of the scenario in the sm higgs inflation , as the inflationary scale exceeds the effective ultraviolet cut - off scale @xcite . as it was realized long ago
, radiative corrections can be the origin of electroweak symmetry breaking @xcite .
the coleman - weinberg mechanism can not work in the standard model due to the large value of the top yukawa coupling , but it can work in models beyond the standard model @xcite .
this is an interesting possibility given the higgs naturalness problem , in the following sense .
if heavy particles are coupled to the higgs boson , like in gut models , then the higgs receives large radiative corrections that bring its mass close to the gut mass scale .
supersymmetry at the tev scale can solve the problem , but given the severe experimental constraints on the masses of the superpartners , it was proposed recently the flatland scenario @xcite , according to which electroweak symmetry is broken radiatively a la coleman - weinberg in the infrared region starting from a flat scalar potential in the ultraviolet region .
regarding inflation , the coleman - weinberg type of potential is a simple and well motivated one , since it naturally arises when loop corrections are taken into account , and it is typical for the new inflation scenario @xcite where inflation takes place near the maximum .
recently it has been studied in @xcite in a b - l extension of the standard model , and a few years ago in @xcite in a gut inflationary model . as shown in @xcite in the context of the effective theory of inflation , cosmic microwave background together with large scale structure data
prefer double - well inflaton potentials .
the 2013 planck data confirmed this result , and not surprisingly the coleman - weinberg potential considered here belongs to this class , and succeeds to reproduce the @xmath4 value and the r bound from the 2013 planck release .
however , in @xcite the inflaton was minimally coupled to gravity . setting @xmath5 , although it is a popular choice , is often unacceptable as was pointed out in @xcite .
non - minimal couplings are generated by quantum corrections even if they are absent in the classical action @xcite , and as a matter of fact the coupling is required if the scalar field theory is to be renormalizable in a classical gravitational background @xcite . for early works on non - minimal
inflation see for example @xcite and references therein .
in the present brief report we imagine a scenario where inflation is driven by the scalar sector of some particle physics model beyond the standard model in which electroweak symmetry breaking takes place radiatively a la coleman and weinberg . since the scale of inflation is close to the gut scale
, we consider a gut model rather than a low energy one , and we also allow for a non - vanishing non - minimal coupling , as required by the quantum corrections already needed to give rise to the coleman - weinberg type of the inflaton potential .
we find that the model is viable as it is in agreement with the recent data from planck , and even more importantly for natural values of the parameters of the model .
we start defining the model by the action @xmath6 where @xmath7 is the non - minimal coupling and @xmath8 with a coleman - weinberg type of potential of the standard form @xcite @xmath9 where a is related to the inflaton quartic self - coupling @xcite , and m is the inflaton vacuum expectation value ( vev ) at the minimum , @xmath10 .
the vacuum energy density at the origin is given by the constant term @xmath11 so that @xmath12 , and the shape of the potential can be seen in figure 1 , and the inflaton mass is given by @xmath13 .
at this point we stress the fact that the coleman - weinberg potential considered in the present work is the standard one obtained from one - loop corrections in minkowski spacetime .
the one - loop corrections in de sitter spacetime ( which approximates an inflationary background ) lead to a very different effective potential as shown in @xcite . [ cols="^,^ " , ] in summary , in this brief report we have considered a gut inflationary model where inflation is driven by the scalar sector of the model with a coleman - weinberg type of potential for the inflaton and a non - minimal coupling of the inflaton to gravity .
as is known , at tree level the @xmath14 potential can not trigger electroweak symmetry breaking , and in addition the corresponding chaotic inflationary model @xmath15 is ruled out by the wmap and planck data .
however , quantum loop corrections modify the inflaton potential and at the same time generate the non - minimal coupling term . the model is characterized by two dimensionless parameters , namely the non - minimal coupling @xmath7 and the inflaton quartic self - coupling @xmath16 .
we have shown that the model leads to predictions in agreement with the 95 per cent cl contours in the r-@xmath4 plane for natural values of the parameters of the model , both for @xmath7 and @xmath16 of the order of @xmath17 . | we wish to thank the anonymous reviewer for his valuable comments that helped in improving the quality of the article .
our work is supported by conicyt under the anillo project act1122 .
a. h. guth , phys .
d * 23 * ( 1981 ) 347 ; + d. h. lyth and a. riotto , phys .
* 314 * ( 1999 ) 1 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9807278 ] ; + n. straumann , annalen phys .
* 15 * ( 2006 ) 701 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0505249 ] .
e. komatsu _ et al .
_ [ wmap collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. suppl .
* 192 * ( 2011 ) 18 [ arxiv:1001.4538 [ astro-ph.co ] ] .
p. a. r. ade _ et al .
_ [ planck collaboration ] , arxiv:1303.5062 [ astro-ph.co ] ; + p. a. r. ade _ et al .
_ [ planck collaboration ] , arxiv:1303.5082 [ astro-ph.co ] .
f. englert and r. brout , phys . rev
. lett .
* 13 * ( 1964 ) 321 ; + p. w. higgs , phys .
* 13 * ( 1964 ) 508 .
g. aad _ et al .
_ [ atlas collaboration ] , phys .
b * 716 * ( 2012 ) 1 [ arxiv:1207.7214 [ hep - ex ] ] ; + s. chatrchyan _ et al . _
[ cms collaboration ] , phys . lett .
b * 716 * ( 2012 ) 30 [ arxiv:1207.7235 [ hep - ex ] ] .
f. l. bezrukov , a. magnin and m. shaposhnikov , phys .
b * 675 * ( 2009 ) 88 [ arxiv:0812.4950 [ hep - ph ] ] ; + f. bezrukov and m. shaposhnikov , jhep * 0907 * ( 2009 ) 089 [ arxiv:0904.1537 [ hep - ph ] ] ; + a. salvio , phys .
b * 727 * ( 2013 ) 234 [ arxiv:1308.2244 [ hep - ph ] ] ; + d. p. george , s. mooij and m. postma , arxiv:1310.2157 [ hep - th ] .
c. p. burgess , h. m. lee and m. trott , jhep * 0909 * ( 2009 ) 103 [ arxiv:0902.4465 [ hep - ph ] ] ; + j. l. f. barbon and j. r. espinosa , phys .
d * 79 * ( 2009 ) 081302 [ arxiv:0903.0355 [ hep - ph ] ] .
s. r. coleman and e. j. weinberg , phys .
d * 7 * ( 1973 ) 1888 .
e. j. chun , s. jung and h. m. lee , phys .
b * 725 * ( 2013 ) 158 [ arxiv:1304.5815 [ hep - ph ] ] .
m. hashimoto , s. iso and y. orikasa , arxiv:1310.4304 [ hep - ph ] .
a. d. linde , phys .
b * 108 * ( 1982 ) 389 ; + a. albrecht and p. j. steinhardt , phys . rev .
* 48 * ( 1982 ) 1220 .
g. barenboim , e. j. chun and h. m. lee , arxiv:1309.1695 [ hep - ph ] . m. u. rehman , q. shafi and j. r. wickman , phys .
d * 78 * ( 2008 ) 123516 [ arxiv:0810.3625 [ hep - ph ] ] . c. destri , h. j. de vega and n. g. sanchez , phys .
d * 77 * ( 2008 ) 043509 [ astro - ph/0703417 ] .
v. faraoni , phys .
d * 53 * ( 1996 ) 6813 [ astro - ph/9602111 ] .
a. d. linde , phys .
b * 114 * ( 1982 ) 431 .
d. z. freedman , i. j. muzinich and e. j. weinberg , annals phys .
* 87 * ( 1974 ) 95 ; + d. z. freedman and e. j. weinberg , annals phys .
* 87 * ( 1974 ) 354 .
t. futamase and k. -i .
maeda , phys .
d * 39 * ( 1989 ) 399 ; + n. makino and m. sasaki , prog .
* 86 * ( 1991 ) 103 ; + d. i. kaiser , [ astro - ph/9507048 ] ; + d. i. kaiser , phys .
d * 52 * ( 1995 ) 4295 [ astro - ph/9408044 ] ; v. faraoni , int .
j. theor .
* 40 * ( 2001 ) 2259 [ hep - th/0009053 ] .
d. boyanovsky , h. j. de vega and n. g. sanchez , phys .
d * 72 * ( 2005 ) 103006 [ astro - ph/0507596 ] ; + d. boyanovsky , c. destri , h. j. de vega and n. g. sanchez , int .
j. mod .
phys . a * 24 * ( 2009 ) 3669 [ arxiv:0901.0549 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; + c. destri , h. j. de vega and n. g. sanchez , annals phys .
* 326 * ( 2011 ) 578 [ arxiv:0906.4102 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . w. h. kinney , e. w. kolb , a. melchiorri and a. riotto , phys .
d * 74 * ( 2006 ) 023502 [ astro - ph/0605338 ] .
n. okada , m. u. rehman and q. shafi , phys .
d * 82 * ( 2010 ) 043502 [ arxiv:1005.5161 [ hep - ph ] ] . | anonymous reviewer comments improving quality article work supported conicyt anillo project act1122 h. guth phys . 23 1981 ) 347 d h. lyth a riotto phys 314 1999 ) 1 arxiv hep - ph/9807278 n. straumann annalen phys . 15 2006 ) 701 hep - ph/0505249 komatsu al wmap collaboration astrophys . 192 2011 ) 18 arxiv:1001.4538 astro-ph.co r ade planck collaboration arxiv:1303.5062 astro-ph.co planck arxiv:1303.5082 astro-ph.co f. englert r. brout . 13 1964 ) 321 w. higgs . 13 1964 ) 508 aad al atlas collaboration . 716 2012 ) 1 arxiv:1207.7214 hep - ex s chatrchyan al cms collaboration . 716 2012 ) 30 arxiv:1207.7235 hep - ex l bezrukov a. magnin m shaposhnikov phys . 675 2009 ) 88 arxiv:0812.4950 hep - ph bezrukov shaposhnikov 0907 2009 ) 089 arxiv:0904.1537 hep - phsalvio phys b 727 2013 ) 234 arxiv:1308.2244 hep - ph george mooij postma arxiv:1310.2157 hep - burgess h lee trott 0909 2009 ) 103:0902.4465 hep - ph barbon espinosa . d 79 2009 ) 081302:0903.0355 hep - ph coleman weinberg d 7 1973 ) 1888 chun jung h m lee b 725 2013 ) 158 arxiv:1304.5815 hep - ph hashimoto iso orikasa:1310.4304 hep - ph linde b 108 1982 ) 389 albrecht steinhardt 48 1982 ) 1220 barenboim chun h m lee arxiv:1309.1695 hep - ph rehman shafi wickman phys . d 78 2008 ) 123516 arxiv:0810.3625 hep - ph destri h j. de vega sanchez phys d 77 2008 ) 043509 astro - ph/0703417 faraoni phys d 53 1996 ) 6813 astro - ph/9602111 linde phys b 114 1982 ) 431freedman muzinich weinberg annals phys 87 1974 ) 95 freedman weinberg 87 1974 354 futamase maeda . 39 1989 ) 399 n. makino m sasaki prog 86 1991 ) 103 d i. kaiser astro - ph/9507048 . 52 1995 ) 4295 astro - ph/9408044 faraoni int. theor. 40 2001 ) 2259 hep - th/0009053 boyanovsky h j. de vega sanchez . 72 2005 ) 103006 astro - ph/0507596 boyanovsky destri de vega sanchez 24 2009 ) 3669 arxiv:0901.0549 astro-ph.co c. destri de vega sanchez annals phys . 326 2011 ) 578 arxiv:0906.4102 astro-ph.co kinney kolb a. melchiorri a riotto phys . 74 2006 ) 023502 astro - ph/0605338 n okada m u. rehman q. shafi phys . 82 2010 ) 043502 arxiv:1005.5161 hep - ph | 0.187849 | 1,660 | 849 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,826 | the study of event - by - event fluctuations of identified hadrons may reveal the degrees of freedom of the strongly interacting matter created in heavy - ion collisions and the underlying dynamics of the system .
the observable @xmath0 , which is defined in terms of the moments of identified - particle multiplicity distributions , is used to quantify the magnitude of the dynamical fluctuations in event - by - event measurements of particle ratios .
the alice detector at the lhc is well - suited for the study of @xmath0 , due to its excellent particle identification capabilities .
particle identification based on the measurement of the specific ionisation energy loss , d@xmath1/d@xmath2 , works well on a statistical basis but suffers from ambiguities when applied on an event - by - event level .
a novel experimental technique called the `` identity method '' is used to overcome such limitations .
the first results on identified particle ratio fluctuations in pb - pb collisions at in alice as a function of centrality are presented .
the alice results for the most peripheral events indicate an increasing correlation between pions and protons which is not reproduced by the hijing and ampt models .
on the other hand , for the most central events the alice results agree with the extrapolations based on the data at lower energies from cern - sps and rhic .
= 1 event - by - event fluctuations ; identified hadrons ; qcd phase transition ; heavy - ion collisions ; lhc | the theory of strong interaction , quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) , predicts that at sufficiently high energies nuclear matter transforms into a deconfined state where nucleons are no longer the basic constituents but rather quarks and gluons .
the event - by - event fluctuations @xcite of suitably chosen observables opens new possibilities to investigate the properties of the so called `` qcd phase diagram '' . in general
, one can classify fluctuations into two parts .
first , dynamical fluctuations which result from correlated particle production reflecting the underlying dynamics of the system . second , statistical fluctuations induced by the measurement process itself due to the finite event multiplicity . in case of independent particle production
the multiplicity fluctuations follow a poisson distribution . to quantify particle correlations the observable @xmath0was proposed in ref .
it is defined as @xmath3 = \dfrac{\langle n_{a}^{2 } \rangle}{{\langle n_{a } \rangle}^{2 } } + \dfrac{\langle n_{b}^{2 } \rangle}{{\langle n_{b } \rangle}^{2 } } - 2\dfrac{\langle n_{a}n_{b } \rangle}{\langle n_{a } \rangle\langle n_{b } \rangle } - \left(\dfrac{1}{\langle n_{a } \rangle } + \dfrac{1}{\langle n_{b } \rangle}\right),\ ] ] where @xmath4 and @xmath5 are the numbers of particle types a and b in a given event and @xmath6 denotes averaging over events .
the quantity @xmath0vanishes when the multiplicity distributions of both particle types are poissonian and independent from each other .
since the negative terms in the formula of @xmath0contain a correlation term , negative values of @xmath0 indicate the degree of correlation between particle species . in this article , we present the measurements of , and in pb - pb collisions at @xmath7=2.76 tev in alice .
the results are compared to the hijing @xcite and ampt @xcite models as well as to measurements at lower energies from cern - sps @xcite and rhic @xcite .
the present analysis uses about 13 million minimum bias pb - pb events at @xmath7=2.76 tev collected by the alice detector @xcite during the 2010 lhc run .
the subdetectors involved in the analysis were the time projection chamber ( tpc ) for the tracking and particle identification and the inner tracking system ( its ) for the vertexing .
moreover , the two forward v0 detectors were used for the centrality estimation . particle identification ( pid )
was based on the measurement of the specific ionisation energy loss , d@xmath1/d@xmath2 , in the tpc gas .
the charged particles reconstructed in the tpc in full azimuth and in the pseudo - rapidity range of @xmath80.8 were used in this analysis .
the momentum range was restricted to 0.2@xmath9@xmath10@xmath91.5
gev/@xmath11 in order to minimise the systematic uncertainties due to overlap of measured particle de / dx distributions .
when the d@xmath1/d@xmath2distributions of different particle species are well separated , a unique particle identification is possible .
however , this is not possible when the measured particle d@xmath1/d@xmath2distributions overlap . and
@xmath12 distributions for pions and protons within the momentum range of 0.3@xmath9@xmath10@xmath90.8 gev/@xmath11.,width=415 ] the so called `` identity method '' @xcite proposes a solution to this misidentification problem .
the method follows a probabilistic approach using the inclusive d@xmath1/d@xmath2distributions measured in the tpc , and determines the moments of the multiplicity distributions by an unfolding procedure .
it requires two basic experimentally measurable event - by - event quantities , @xmath13 and @xmath12 , which are defined as @xmath14 , \quad \quad w_{j } \equiv \sum_{i=1}^{n(n ) } \omega_{j}(x_{i}),\ ] ] where @xmath2 stands for the d@xmath1/d@xmath2of a given track , @xmath15 is the d@xmath1/d@xmath2distribution of particle @xmath16 , @xmath17 is the inclusive d@xmath1/d@xmath2 distribution within a given event and @xmath18 is the number of tracks within the @xmath19th event . in other words , @xmath20 is a bayesian probability measure of being particle type @xmath16 for a given track .
thus , in case of perfect identification one expects @xmath21 , while this does not hold in case of misidentification .
the moments of the @xmath12 distributions @xmath22 can be easily constructed directly from experimental data .
the identity method provides the real moments @xmath23 of the particle multiplicity distributions by means of an unfolding procedure using the moments of these @xmath12 distributions .
examples for distributions of @xmath13 and @xmath12 in pb - pb data are shown in fig .
[ fig : wdist ] .
details of the derivation can be found in ref .
@xcite .
the identity method exploits the fits of inclusive d@xmath1/d@xmath2distributions for the calculation of @xmath13 .
since the overlap regions in the d@xmath1/d@xmath2distributions are also allowed , one needs very good fits of inclusive d@xmath1/d@xmath2spectra over the full momentum range covered in the analysis .
therefore , a good understanding of the detector response of the tpc is required . to this end ,
clean particle samples , which were retrieved from v0 decay particles ( pions from @xmath24 decays , protons from @xmath25 decays and electrons from photon conversions ) , were used .
[ fig : dedxdist ] left panel shows the determination of the detector response for pions , where a generalised gauss function was used for a better description of the response shape .
the detector response functions obtained in this way were later used as the fit functions in the inclusive d@xmath1/d@xmath2spectra fits as shown in fig .
[ fig : dedxdist ] right panel . [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ]
in summary , dynamical fluctuations of identified particle ratios were measured as function of centrality in pb - pb collisions at @xmath7=2.76 tev with alice .
the identity method , which is planned to be used in further event - by - event analyses in alice , was applied to alice data successfully for the first time . the results for and are in qualitative agreement with models .
however , the negative values of observed in most peripheral collisions , which indicate a correlation between pions and protons , are not reproduced by the models . in all three cases , alice results in the most central events
indicate positive results consistent with poissonian expectation within 2@xmath26 which agree with the extrapolations based on the data at lower energies from cern - sps and rhic . as a next step , a more differential analysis of @xmath0 in terms of rapidity , @xmath27 , and charge sign dependence as well as
a study in p - p collisions is presently being prepared . | theory strong interaction quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) predicts at high energies nuclear matter transforms into deconfined state nucleons basic constituents but quarks gluons event - by - event fluctuations of observables opens possibilities to investigate properties qcd phase diagram fluctuations into two parts dynamical fluctuations from correlated particle production dynamics system second statistical fluctuations induced by measurement process due to finite event multiplicity independent particle production multiplicity fluctuations follow poisson distribution to quantify particle correlations observable @xmath0was proposed in defined as @xmath3 = \dfrac{\langle n + - @xmath4 and @xmath5 are numbers of particle types a and b in event @xmath6 denotes averaging over events quantity @xmath0vanishes when multiplicity distributions of both particle types are poissonian and independentnegative terms in formula @xmath0contain correlation indicate correlation between particle species measurements pb - collisions at @xmath7=2.76 tev in alice results compared to hijing ampt @xcite models cern - sps rhic @xcite analysis uses 13 million minimum bias pb - pb events at @xmath7=2.76 tev alice detector @xcite 2010 lhc run subdetectors time projection chamber identification inner tracking system two forward v0 detectors for centrality estimation particle identification based on ionisation energy loss d@xmath1/d@xmath2 in tpc gas charged particles reconstructed in tpc full azimuth pseudo - rapidity range of @xmath80.8 used momentum range restricted to 0.2@xmath9@xmath10@xmath91.5 gev/@xmath11 uncertainties overlap distributions@xmath2distributions separated unique particle identification possible not possible when@xmath2distributions overlap distributions for pions protons within momentum range 0.3@xmath9@xmath10@xmath90.8 gev/@xmath11 identity method @xcite proposes solution misidentificationmethod follows probabilistic approach d@xmath1/d@xmath2distributions tpc determines moments multiplicity distributions unfolding procedure requires two measurable quantities @xmath13 @xmath12 defined @xmath2 d@xmath1/d@xmath2of track @xmath15 d@xmath1/d@xmath2distribution particle @xmath16 @xmath17 inclusive d@xmath1/d@xmath2 distribution event @xmath18 number of tracks within @xmath19th event @xmath20 is bayesian probability measure particle type @xmath16 for track perfect identification expects @xmath21 misidentification moments @xmath12 constructed from experimental data identity method provides real moments @xmath23 particle multiplicity distributions unfolding procedure moments @xmath12 distributions examples distributions @xmath13 in pb - data shown in fig . details derivation in ref . @xcite identity method exploits fits inclusive d@xmath1/d@xmath2distributions for calculation @xmath13 overlap regions@xmath2distributions allowed needs good fits of d@xmath1/d@xmath2spectra over full momentum rangeunderstanding of detector response tpc required clean particle samples retrieved from v0 decay particles pions @xmath24 protons @xmath25 electrons from photon conversions used fig left panel detector response for pions generalised gauss function used response shape detector response functions used as fit functions in d@xmath1/d@xmath2spectra fits dynamical fluctuations of particle ratios measured function centrality in pb - pb collisions at @xmath7=2.76 tev with alice identity method in analyses alice applied to alice data first time results qualitative agreement with models negative values in peripheral collisions correlation between pions protons not reproduced by models alice results in central events indicate positive results consistent with poissonian expectation within 2@xmath26 with extrapolations data lower energies from cern - sps rhic next differential analysis of @xmath0 rapidity @xmath27 charge sign dependence study in p - p collisions prepared | 0.265196 | 1,638 | 825 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,830 | stationary droplets simulated by multi - phase lattice boltzmann methods lead to spurious velocities around them . in this article
i report the origin of these spurious velocities for one example and show how they can be avoided . | imagine a stationary droplet in quiescent conditions . for a real system
there are , of course , no velocities .
yet when this simple system is simulated with a lattice boltzmann method you will find a flow - field around the drop . even if you start with a no flow initial condition this velocity field will develop .
an example of these velocities in shown in figure [ fig1 ] ( a ) .
these velocities are know as `` spurious velocities '' .
the magnitude of the velocities depends on the details of the method , the radius of the drop , the surface tension and the viscosity .
there have been several studies@xcite of different methods that tell us about the dependence of the spurious velocities on these parameters . in the past the focus of the work has been on reducing the magnitude of these velocities but to the best of my knowledge no good understanding of their origin has been reached . in this article
i will explain why we see these spurious velocities at all and how , and at what cost , they can be avoided .
i will first introduce a simple lattice boltzmann method for model b dynamics and show the perfect approach to equilibrium which is free of any spurious currents .
then i extend this model to include hydrodynamics and we will see that spurious currents suddenly appear .
a simple examination shows why there should not be any spurious currents according to the continuum equations and i point out the terms through which discretization errors drive the spurious currents .
i introduced a thermodynamically consistent discretization of these terms which leads to a lattice boltzmann method that is free of spurious currents .
model b is a model describing the behavior of binary alloys .
we will consider a mixture of , say , @xmath0 and @xmath1 atoms .
the system is characterized by the order parameter @xmath2 which represents the difference in the densities of the two components , _
i.e. _ @xmath3 represents pure @xmath0 and @xmath4 represents pure @xmath1 .
the dynamics of this conserved order parameter @xmath2 is then given by @xmath5 where d is a diffusion coefficient and @xmath6 is the chemical potential .
the system is described by the free energy @xmath7 . for simplicity
we will consider a landau free energy expansion around the critical point which is given by @xmath8 to simulate this equation we use a bgk lattice boltzmann method given by @xmath9 \label{lbg}\ ] ] where the relaxation time @xmath10 may depend on @xmath2 and the set of discrete velocities @xmath11 will be determined later .
the behavior of the model will be determined by the moments of the equilibrium distribution @xmath12 .
we name these moments @xmath13 a taylor expansion to second order in the derivatives gives @xmath14\ ] ] we now take the first moment ( @xmath15 ) of this expansion and obtain as the equation of motion for the order parameter @xmath2 @xmath16 we have two independent ways to ensure that this equation be equivalent to ( [ order ] ) .
either we choose @xmath17 @xmath18 , @xmath19 or alternatively @xmath20 and @xmath21 note that the @xmath22 term is now third order . in two dimensions we can implement both of these approaches with a small velocity set of five velocities @xmath23 .
both approaches behave equivalently , as expected , but they differ in the ranges of stability as will be discussed elsewhere@xcite . both implementations of this simple diffusive lattice boltzmann algorithm are free from spurious currents .
we conclude that hydrodynamics is required to see spurious currents .
in order to simulate binary fluids we have to introduce a fluid velocity which will convect the order parameter @xmath2 . this fluid velocity will obey the navier - stokes equation which is coupled to the order parameter @xmath2 through a thermodynamics pressure tensor @xmath24 .
we will denote the fluid density as @xmath25 .
the equations of motion are@xcite @xmath26\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the pressure is @xmath27 , @xmath28 is the viscosity and @xmath29 the number of spatial dimensions . the pressure tensor @xmath24 is defined as @xmath30\mathbf{1 } + \kappa \nabla \phi\nabla\phi\ ] ] we can implement these continuum equations using lattice boltzmann . with ( [ lbg ] )
we now define @xmath31 . by imposing @xmath32 and @xmath33
we obtain the required order parameter equation ( [ orderc ] ) with either of the previous choices for @xmath34 and @xmath35 .
the navier - stokes equations are obtained with a usual one - component lattice boltzmann method which is coupled to the order parameter equation through a body force of @xmath36 . + ( a ) + ( b ) doing this leads to the well known spurious velocities as shown in figure [ fig1 ] .
we see that there are not only spurious currents but also the chemical potential @xmath6 is no longer constant . since the implementation of a simple model b did not lead to the spurious velocities it is reasonable to assume that the implementation of the additional lattice boltzmann equation for the total density and the momentum is the reason for the occurrence of the spurious velocities .
why should the continuous equations in equilibrium be consistent with a quiescent drop without spurious velocities ?
this is because the two driving terms @xmath37 and @xmath36 are related through @xmath38 this means that a constant chemical potential will lead to zero driving force in both equations .
when we now use this knowledge and replace the driving force @xmath39 with @xmath40 we find that the spurious velocities vanish to machine precision .
the density of the order - parameter in the surrounding fluid is @xmath41 and the density in the drop is @xmath42 ( cf figure [ fig1 ] ) .
the size of the maximum velocity is now @xmath43 .
the chemical potential has the value of @xmath44 and variations are smaller than @xmath45 .
so why do the spurious velocities appear in the first place ?
this is because the discretizations of @xmath36 and @xmath46 are very different .
we conclude that the different discretizations of the driving forces for the order parameter and momentum equations are the origin of spurious velocities for lattice boltzmann .
there is , however , a caveat .
the term @xmath40 in its discrete form is not a divergence of a scalar field which means that momentum is now only approximately conserved . to be able to see the absence of spurious velocities i included a tiny correction term in the definition of the momentum that ensures that the total momentum of the system does not change .
also my implementation of the algorithm turned out to be unstable so i added a small amount of numerical viscosity by multiplying a velocity by @xmath47 and adding 0.00025 times the velocity of the four nearest neighbors .
this rendered the simulations stable .
i proved that spurious velocities in one particular lattice boltzmann implementation are caused by non - compatible discretizations of the driving forces for the order - parameter and momentum equations .
the different discretization errors for the forces compete and drive the spurious currents .
i believe that the same argument holds for all lattice boltzmann methods that exhibit spurious velocities .
these spurious velocities can be avoided by ensuring that the discretizations of the driving forces are compatible . + * acknowledgement * this work was funded by epsrc gr / m56234 and gr / r67699 . | imagine stationary droplet in quiescent conditions real system no velocities system simulated with lattice boltzmann method flow - field around drop no flow condition velocity field develop example velocities in in figure fig1 ] ( a ) as `` spurious velocities '' magnitude depends on details method radius drop surface tension viscosity several studies about dependence spurious velocities on parameters focus on reducing magnitude velocities no understanding of origin reached article explain why spurious velocities how avoided introduce simple lattice boltzmann method for model b dynamics perfect approach to equilibrium free of spurious currents extend model to hydrodynamics spurious currents appear examination shows why spurious currents according to continuum equations discretization errors drive spurious currents introduced thermodynamically consistent discretization leads to lattice boltzmann method free of spurious currents model b behavior of binary alloys consider mixture of @xmath0 and @xmath1 atoms system characterized by order parameter @xmath2 represents difference in densities of two components @xmath3 represents pure @xmath0 @xmath4 pure @xmath1dynamics of conserved order parameter @xmath2 given by @xmath5 d diffusion coefficient @xmath6 chemical potential system described by free energy @xmath7 consider landau free energy expansion around critical point by @xmath8 bgk lattice boltzmann method @xmath9 relaxation time @xmath10 on @xmath2 discrete velocities @xmath11 determined behavior model determined by moments equilibrium distribution @xmath12 moments @xmath13 taylor expansion to second order @xmath14 first moment @xmath15 expansion equation of motion for order parameter @xmath2 @xmath16 two ways to equation equivalent to order choose @xmath17 @xmath20 @xmath22 term third order implement approaches with five velocities @xmath23 approaches behave equivalently differ in ranges of stability implementations diffusive lattice boltzmann algorithm free from spurious currents hydrodynamics required spurious currents simulate binary fluids introduce fluid velocity order parameter @xmath2 navier - stokes equation coupled to order parameter through thermodynamics pressure tensor @xmath24 fluid density as @xmath25equations of motion are@xcite @xmath26{aligned pressure @xmath27 @xmath28 viscosity @xmath29 spatial dimensions pressure tensor @xmath24 defined as @xmath30\mathbf implement continuum equations using lattice boltzmann define @xmath31 imposing @xmath32 @xmath33 obtain order parameter equation with previous choices for @xmath34 and @xmath35 navier - stokes equations obtained with one - component lattice boltzmann method coupled to order parameter equation through body force of @xmath36 leads to spurious velocities figure fig1 chemical potential @xmath6 no constant simple model b to spurious velocities additional lattice boltzmann equation for total density momentum reason for spurious velocities continuous equations in equilibrium consistent with quiescent drop without spurious velocities driving terms @xmath37 @xmath36 related through @xmath38 constant chemical potential to zero driving force driving force @xmath39 with @xmath40 spurious velocities vanish precision density of order - parameter in surrounding fluid is @xmath41 density in drop @xmath42 maximum velocity now @xmath43chemical potential value @xmath44 variations smaller than @xmath45 spurious velocities appear ? discretizations of @xmath36 and @xmath46 different different discretizations driving forces order parameter momentum equations origin of spurious velocities for lattice boltzmann term @xmath40 not divergence of scalar field momentum approximately conserved spurious included tiny correction term in definition momentum total momentum system change implementation algorithm unstable added numerical viscosity multiplying velocity by @xmath47 adding 0.00025 times velocity of four nearest neighbors rendered simulations stable proved spurious velocities lattice boltzmann implementation caused by non - compatible discretizations driving forces momentum different discretization errors drive spurious currents same argument holds for all lattice boltzmann methods spurious velocities avoided by ensuring discretizations driving forces compatible work funded by epsrc gr / m56234 gr / r67699 | 0.267388 | 1,634 | 831 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,840 | we discuss resonance recombination for quarks and show that it is compatible with quark and hadron distributions in local thermal equilibrium .
we then calculate realistic heavy quark phase space distributions in heavy ion collisions using langevin simulations with non - perturbative @xmath0-matrix interactions in hydrodynamic backgrounds .
we hadronize the heavy quarks on the critical hypersurface given by hydrodynamics after constructing a criterion for the relative recombination and fragmentation contributions .
we discuss the influence of recombination and flow on the resulting heavy meson and single electron @xmath1 and elliptic flow .
we will also comment on the effect of diffusion of open heavy flavor mesons in the hadronic phase .
quark recombination has been identified as an important mechanism of hadronization in high energy nuclear collisions @xcite .
evidence for recombination can be seen in the large baryon / meson ratios and the quark - number scaling of elliptic flow @xmath2 at the relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) @xcite .
first - generation recombination models that could explain these phenomena at intermediate transverse momenta @xmath3 gev/@xmath4 were based on so - called instantaneous quark coalescence .
they lack explicit energy conservation and serious concerns arise if they are applied to low @xmath5 where the bulk of hadrons are produced .
hence it is important to understand how quark recombination in local kinetic equilibrium can be described .
a promising formalism was put forward in @xcite based on a boltzmann equation for quarks and antiquarks scattering through resonances which resemble mesons . this resonance recombination model ( rrm )
conserves 4-momentum and exhibits detailed balance .
therefore , in the long - time limit of the boltzmann dynamics the mesons should acquire local thermal equilibrium with temperature and flow fields given by those of the equilibrated quark distributions .
we have numerically confirmed this assertion both for simple blastwaves with constant hadronization time @xcite , and for the non - trivial hadronization hypersurface of a hydrodynamic evolution of the quark phase @xcite .
hence resonance recombination preserves local thermal equilibrium for arbitrary flow fields and for any realistic hypersurface .
an important corollary is the fact that any quark - number or kinetic energy scaling at _ low _ hadron-@xmath5 is not due to quark recombination .
local equilibration would not allow any microscopic information about hadronization to be detected , and we explicitely show in ref .
@xcite how a realistic flow field together with a reasonable freeze - out hierarchy for hadrons can mimic quark number- and kinetic energy scaling at rhic at _ low _ @xmath5 to good accuracy .
heavy charm ( @xmath4 ) and bottom ( @xmath6 ) quarks have been widely discussed as ideal internal probes for quark gluon plasma , see @xcite and references therein .
the large masses increase their thermalization times , and the degree of thermalization in heavy ion collisions encodes valuable information about their interactions with quark gluon plasma ( qgp ) . here
we report on our effort to set up a formalism that is consistently based on the notion of strongly coupled qgp , both for the diffusion of heavy quarks through qgp , and their hadronization through an appropriate superposition of recombination and fragmentation @xcite .
the latter provides an opportunity to extend the resonance recombination formalism to quark distributions away from local thermal equilibrium .
the dynamics of the heavy quarks in a background medium can be described by a relativistic implementation of the langevin equation @xcite .
we use the ideal , 2 + 1-d , boost - invariant hydro code azhydro @xcite to model the locally equilibrated background qgp medium .
the drag and diffusion coefficients of the heavy quarks in the medium are calculated from non - perturbative @xmath0-matrix results on heavy - light quark interactions @xcite .
the @xmath0-matrix approach exhibits feshbach resonances both in the color - singlet and color - triplet channel and leads to resonant interactions up to @xmath7 .
the resonant relaxation rates are substantially enhanced compared to the corresponding perturbative elastic rates .
the initial heavy quark momentum spectra are taken from perturbative calculations cross - checked with measured @xmath8 semi - leptonic decay spectra @xcite , while the spatial distribution is determined by the binary collision density . - and @xmath9-meson nuclear modification factors for semi - central au+au collisions at rhic compared to the @xmath4 and @xmath6 quark @xmath1 from which they originate.,width=283 ] we employ a test particle method for our langevin simulation .
we have checked that in the limit of very large ( unphysical ) relaxation rates our charm quark distributions approach the equilibrium given by the hydrodynamic background .
figure [ fig:1 ] shows the nuclear modification factor @xmath1 for @xmath4 and @xmath6 quarks on the hadronization hypersurface ( given by azhydro ) calculated from our langevin with non - perturbative @xmath0-matrix coefficients for semi - central collisions at rhic .
we observe about 60% quenching for charm quarks at large momenta @xmath10 which is reflected in an excess at small @xmath10 due to conservation of heavy quarks .
suppression for @xmath6 is significantly smaller .
hadronization of heavy quarks should proceed through coalescence with light quarks from the medium if heavy - light scattering rates are large enough to allow for such interactions in the color - singlet channel during the pertinent time interval ( e.g. the duration of the mixed phase ) . on the other hand ,
if such heavy - light interactions are rare , e.g. at large @xmath10 , independent fragmentation of the heavy quark should occur . for a given heavy quark momentum in its local fluid rest frame we estimate the scattering rate @xmath11 in the color singlet channel in the @xmath0-matrix approach at @xmath12 .
we approximate the coalescence probability through @xmath13 ( or @xmath14 if the product exceeds one ) . in practice
we boost the rates into the lab frame and apply them as a function of heavy quark @xmath10 with @xmath15 fm/@xmath4 ( motivated by the fact that this time interval is well below the duration of the mixed phase in azhydro ) which leads to @xmath16 at vanishing @xmath10 .
note that this approach treats the interactions of heavy quarks in the medium and their hadronization using the same non - pertrubative dynamics .
it also ensures that @xmath17 for very large @xmath10 .
we evaluate @xmath18 for each test particle and apply fragmentation or resonance recombination accordingly .
-meson @xmath5-spectrum for semi - central au+au collisions at top rhic energy .
the total spectrum is normalized to one test - particle .
( b ) : the same three contributions to the elliptic flow @xmath2.,title="fig:",width=283 ] -meson @xmath5-spectrum for semi - central au+au collisions at top rhic energy .
the total spectrum is normalized to one test - particle .
( b ) : the same three contributions to the elliptic flow @xmath2.,title="fig:",width=283 ] figure [ fig:2 ] shows spectra and elliptic flow @xmath2 for @xmath19 mesons for semi - central collisions at rhic .
fragmentation and recombination contributions are shown together with the total .
figure [ fig:1 ] provides @xmath1 for both @xmath19 and @xmath9 mesons .
we notice that resonance recombination provides a significant enhancement of both radial and elliptic flow .
the former can be seen from the prominent flow `` bump '' developing in @xmath1 for @xmath19 mesons .
resonance recombination acts as an additional interaction of heavy quarks with the medium , making a noticeable contribution to further equilibration . in figure [ fig:3 ]
we display @xmath1 and @xmath2 of electrons from semi - leptonic decays of @xmath19 and @xmath9 mesons , compared to experimental data .
the comparison with data is favorable if one keeps in mind two facts : azhydro is tuned to kinetic freeze - out and exhibits too little radial flow around @xmath12 .
this becomes obvious if the results with azhydro are compared to those using a fireball parameterization with the correct radial flow at @xmath12 ( see @xcite for details ) .
secondly , we expect an increase in elliptic flow of about 20 - 30% in the hadronic phase .
we have recently calculated relaxation rates of charm in a hadron gas and have found that at @xmath12 the results tend to be close to those of the @xmath0-matrix calculation in qgp @xcite .
we will elaborate on both points further in a forthcoming publication . from semi - leptonic decays of @xmath19 and @xmath9 mesons for central ( @xmath20 fm ) and semi - central ( @xmath21 fm )
au+au collisions at rhic . using either azhydro or a parameterized fireball as the background medium .
we compare to data from phenix @xcite and star @xcite .
( b ) electron @xmath2 from the same source.,title="fig:",width=283 ] from semi - leptonic decays of @xmath19 and @xmath9 mesons for central ( @xmath20 fm ) and semi - central ( @xmath21 fm ) au+au collisions at rhic .
using either azhydro or a parameterized fireball as the background medium .
we compare to data from phenix @xcite and star @xcite .
( b ) electron @xmath2 from the same source.,title="fig:",width=283 ] this work was supported by the u.s
. national science foundation ( nsf ) through career grant phy-0847538 and grant phy-0969394 , by the a .- v .-
humboldt foundation , by the riken / bnl research center and doe grant de - ac02 - 98ch10886 , and by the jet collaboration and doe grant de - fg02 - 10er41682 . | 0.000869 | 0 | 0 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. | ||
195,855 | the fundamental limit of coded caching is investigated for the case with @xmath0 files and @xmath1 users . an improved outer bound
is obtained through the computational approach developed by the author in an earlier work .
this result is part of the online collection of `` solutions of computed information theoretic limits ( scitl ) '' . | in a recent work @xcite , maddah - ali and niesen considered the caching problem which deals with improving the content delivery efficiency , _
i.e. _ , the total traffic rate @xmath2 in the delivery phase , through the utilization of local cache memory of capacity @xmath3 each where the coded contents are strategically prepared in the placement phase , in a system with @xmath4 files and @xmath5 users .
it was shown coded caching can be rather beneficial , and in fact orderly optimal , while uncoded caching solution suffers a significant loss .
subsequent works extended it to decentralized caching placements @xcite , caching with nonuniform demands @xcite , and online caching placements @xcite , etc .. despite these advances , the fundamental tradeoff between the delivery traffic rate @xmath2 and cache memory capacity @xmath3 is not fully known except the two - user two - file case .
this is partly due to the fact that the main focus of these existing investigations @xcite is on the regime when the number of files and the number of users are both large , where coded caching can provide the largest gain over the uncoded counterpart .
however , within the problem setting of@xcite , the number of users @xmath5 accounted for in the placement phase is also the total number of simultaneous content requests in the delivery phase , and in some applications the number of simultaneous data requests can be quite small . in such scenarios , better understanding of the fundamental limits of the caching problem , when either @xmath4 or @xmath5 is small , in fact becomes rather important .
the outer bound provided in @xcite was obtained through a cut - set argument , and it is generally suspected to be not tight .
however , stronger outer bounds appear difficult to find analytically . in this short note
, we provide an improved outer bound for the case with @xmath0 files and @xmath1 users , which is obtained using the computational approach developed in @xcite .
this outer bound is included in the online collection of `` solutions of computed information theoretic limits ( scitl ) '' at @xcite , where the data files for the proof can be downloaded for further processing .
we use the problem definition and notation given in @xcite : @xmath3 is the capacity of the local memory cache size , and @xmath2 is the multicast rate in the delivery transmission ; each file is assumed to have unit size , _
@xmath7 , since normalizing by @xmath8 does not cause any essential loss here .
the main result of this note is the following theorem . the memory - delivery - rate tradeoff for the @xmath6 coded caching problem must satisfy : @xmath9 .
[ fig : region],width=377 ] this region is illustrated in fig .
[ fig : region ] .
we note that the point @xmath10 , which was shown to be achievable in @xcite , is optimal since it is on the boundary of the outer bound .
the first two and the last two inequalities in ( [ eqn : bounds ] ) are already known in @xcite .
the remaining ones are new , and we discuss them in some details in the next section . for reference ,
the inner bound given in @xcite through a centralized placement algorithm is also plotted .
we shall not provide the full details of the proof in this note , since some of them can be rather large ( in a table form , or long when written down as chains of inequalities ) .
however , one of the inequalities is discussed in some depth in section [ sec : translation ] to illustrate the manner this bound is obtained , and interested readers are referred to @xcite for more details .
in this section we discuss the symmetry we utilized to reduce the complexity of the computation , which is important to understand the tabulation based proof . in the sequel we use @xmath11 to denote the @xmath12-th ( random )
file , @xmath13 to denote the content stored at the @xmath12-th user .
the multicasted message in the delivery phase is written as @xmath14 , meaning that it is the message when the first user demands the @xmath12-th file , the second user demands the @xmath15-th file , and the third user demands the @xmath16-th file .
the files are mutually independent .
similar as in @xcite , it can be shown that without loss of generality we can consider only symmetric codes . however , here the symmetry structure is different from that in @xcite . in the computational approach ,
we utilize the following type of symmetry to reduce the computation .
let three sets of random variables be given as @xmath17 let a permutation function be defined as @xmath18 on the set of @xmath19 .
the permutation operates on the set of @xmath20 as follows @xmath21 and on the set @xmath22 as follows @xmath23 for example the permutation function @xmath24 maps @xmath25 to @xmath26 , but maps any @xmath27 to @xmath28 , and thus the set @xmath29 to @xmath30 .
we call a given caching code symmetric , if for any @xmath31 , and any permutation @xmath32 , we have @xmath33 as a reality check , consider @xmath34 under the aforementioned permutation : it should be equal to @xmath35 ; notice that @xmath36 is a function of @xmath37 and under the permutation , @xmath36 is still a function of @xmath38 .
intuitively , we prove that symmetric codes are without loss of optimality based on the idea of time ( space ) sharing : encode @xmath39 of the three files and place the coded cache in a permuted order at the three users , which will remove any asymmetry in the code .
we plan to explore the symmetry structure further in a subsequent work .
.the entropy terms used in the proof . [ cols="^,^ " , ] to illustrate the proof obtained using the computational approach , consider the inequality @xmath40 , which is particularly simple to prove .
this proof is a direct translation of the solution obtained using the computational approach , which are given in table [ tab : correspondence ] and table [ table : cancellation ] , where we use @xmath7 to denote the unit of the file size .
we can alternatively write the following chain of inequalities @xmath41 where ( s ) is for reason of symmetry , and ( a ) is because the message @xmath42 together with the coded content cached at user-@xmath43 , _
i.e. , @xmath44 _ , can recover @xmath45 , ( b ) is because of the assumption that each file has unit size as well as the chain rule , and ( c ) is because the coded content cached at user-@xmath46 , _
i.e. , @xmath47 _ , together with @xmath42 can recover @xmath36 , and @xmath47 together with @xmath48 can also recover @xmath49 . note the five inequalities in ( [ eqn : chain ] )
correspond to the five rows in table [ table : cancellation ] , though not in the same order , and not the exact same form because of the symmetry structure and application of certain chain rule simplifications .
an improved outer bound is given for the caching problem when @xmath6 in this note .
this result is part of the online collection of `` solutions of computed information theoretic limits ( scitl ) '' hosted at @xcite , which hopefully in the future can serve as a data depot for information theoretic limits obtained through computational approaches .
some results in this collection requires non - trivial variation of the approach outlined in @xcite , the details of which will be presented elsewhere . | recent work @xcite maddah - ali and niesen considered caching problem improving content delivery efficiency total traffic rate @xmath2 delivery phase utilization local cache memory capacity @xmath3 coded contents prepared placement phase system with @xmath4 files @xmath5 users coded caching beneficial optimal uncoded caching suffers significant loss works extended to decentralized caching nonuniform demands online caching fundamental tradeoff between delivery traffic rate @xmath2 cache memory capacity @xmath3 not known except two - user two - file case due main focus @xcite on regime number files users large coded caching gain over uncoded problem setting@xcite number of users @xmath5 placement phase total number simultaneous content requests delivery phase some applications simultaneous data requests small understanding fundamental limits caching problem when @xmath4 or @xmath5 small important outer bound in @xcite obtained through cut - set argument suspected not tight stronger outer bounds difficult to find improved outer bound for case with @xmath0 files @xmath1 users obtained using computational approach @xciteouter bound included in online collection solutions of computed information theoretic limits at @xcite data files for proof downloaded for processing use problem definition notation in @xcite : @xmath3 is capacity local memory cache size @xmath2 multicast rate in delivery transmission each file assumed unit size @xmath7 normalizing by @xmath8 essential loss main result is theorem memory - delivery - rate tradeoff for @xmath6 coded caching problem must satisfy @xmath9 fig region region illustrated in fig . point @xmath10 achievable in @xcite optimal on boundary of outer bound first two and last two inequalities in known in @xcite remaining ones new discuss in next section inner bound in @xcite through centralized placement algorithm also plotted not provide full details of proof large one discussed in section [ sec : translation ] readers referred to @xcite for details discuss symmetry to reduce complexity computation important to understand tabulation based proof sequel use @xmath11 @xmath12-th random file @xmath13 content stored at @xmath12-th user multicasted message delivery phase written as @xmath14 first user demands @xmath12-th second @xmath15-th third @xmath16-th files mutually independent similar @xcite without loss of generality consider symmetric codes symmetry structure different computational approach symmetry reduce computation three sets random variables as @xmath17 permutation function as @xmath18 on set @xmath19 permutation operates on @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 permutation function @xmath24 maps @xmath25 to @xmath26 maps @xmath27 to @xmath28 @xmath29 to @xmath30 call caching code symmetric @xmath31 permutation @xmath32 @xmath33 check consider @xmath34 under permutation equal to @xmath35 @xmath36 function of @xmath37 permutation function of @xmath38 prove symmetric codes without loss of optimality time space sharing encode @xmath39 of three files place coded cache in permuted order at three users asymmetry code plan to explore symmetry structure subsequent work entropy terms used in proofcols="^,^ " illustrate proof computational approach consider inequality @xmath40 simple to prove proof direct translation of solution computational approach given in table [ correspondence cancellation ] use @xmath7 unit file size alternatively write chain of inequalities @xmath41 ( s ) symmetry ( a ) message @xmath42 coded content cached user-@xmath43 @xmath44 recover @xmath45 ( b ) assumption each file unit size chain rule c ) coded content cached user-@xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath42 recover @xmath36 @xmath47 @xmath48 recover @xmath49 five inequalities in chain correspond to five rows in table cancellation ] not same order not same form symmetry structure chain rule simplifications improved outer bound for caching problem @xmath6 result part of online collection of solutions of computed information theoretic limits ) '' at @xcite data depot for information theoretic limits computational approaches results variation of approach @xcite details presented elsewhere | 0.268214 | 1,651 | 852 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,858 | we construct exact solutions for a system of two nonlinear partial differential equations describing the spatio - temporal dynamics of a predator - prey system where the prey per capita growth rate is subject to the allee effect . using the @xmath0 expansion method ,
we derive exact solutions to this model for two different wave speeds . for each wave velocity
we report three different forms of solutions .
we also discuss the biological relevance of the solutions obtained .
reaction - diffusion equations , predator - prey system , @xmath0-expansion method . | in this paper we derive exact solutions for a diffusive predator - prey system @xcite , @xmath1 where @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 are positive parameters .
subscripts @xmath6 and @xmath7 denote partial derivatives .
the equations are expressed in dimensionless variables , where scaling of space and time have been introduced so to have the equation in a simple form .
the biological meaning of the each term has been discussed in @xcite , which we briefly review .
the model is of the predator - prey kind , with @xmath8 and @xmath9 being the densities of prey and predator .
spatial redistribution of the population is governed by diffusive dynamics , with both species having the same diffusivities , @xcite . in absence of the predator ,
the temporal dynamics of the prey density is of the allee type @xcite , small populations being not viable .
presence of the predator population negatively affects the prey population . in turn , the predator population is totally dependent on prey availability , as the only term in the predator equation that represents the growth of the population is the @xmath10 term , where @xmath2 quantifies the gain in natality due to prey consumption . the parameters @xmath5 and @xmath4 represent the per capita mortality rate of prey and predator respectively , in the linear , small populations , limit .
finally , the @xmath11 is a closure relation taking into account the effects of higher trophic levels @xcite . to investigate the dynamics of the above diffusive predator - prey system the authors of ref . @xcite
have assumed the following relations between the parameters , namely @xmath12 and @xmath13 . in other words
it has been assumed that the per capita mortality rate of prey and predator are equal and the rate of biomass production at the lower level must be consistent with the rate of biomass assimilation at the upper level of the web @xcite . under this assumption eq .
( [ qqq1 ] ) reads @xmath14 in our work also we consider the predator - prey system ( [ qqq6 ] ) only .
we construct exact analytic solutions to the equation ( [ qqq6 ] ) in order to understand the properties of this model for different parametric values .
to do so we employ the @xmath0 expansion method @xcite .
this method has been applied to several nonlinear evolutionary equations . here
we demonstrate that the utility of this method in exploring dynamics of a diffusive predator - prey system .
while implementing @xmath0 expansion method to equation ( [ qqq6 ] ) we obtain exact solutions for two different wave speeds ( vide eqs .
( [ qqq17 ] ) and ( [ qqq18 ] ) ) . in both the cases we give three different types of exact solutions .
the plan of the paper is as follows . to begin with , in sec .
2 , we describe the @xmath0 expansion method . in sec . 3 , we consider eq .
( [ qqq6 ] ) and derive exact solutions of it . finally , we present our conclusion in sec .
in this section we discuss briefly the method of finding exact solutions for a system of nonlinear partial differential equations ( pdes ) using @xmath15-expansion method .
suppose that the system of nonlinear pdes is of the form @xmath16 where @xmath17 and @xmath18 are two unknown functions and @xmath19 and @xmath20 are polynomials in @xmath17 and @xmath18 and their partial derivatives .
the @xmath15 expansion method involves the following four steps .
@xmath21 let us introduce the travelling wave reduction @xmath22 in the pde ( [ aaa1 ] ) so that the latter becomes @xmath23 where prime denotes differentiation with respect to the new variable @xmath24 .
@xmath25 suppose that the solution of @xmath26 can be expressed by a polynomial in @xmath27 , that is @xmath28 with @xmath29 is the solution of the second order linear damped harmonic oscillator equation @xmath30 in the above @xmath31 and @xmath32 are constants and @xmath33 , @xmath34 .
the positive integers @xmath4 and @xmath35 can be determined by substituting ( [ aaa4 ] ) in ( [ aaa3 ] ) and considering the homogeneous balance between the highest order derivative and nonlinear terms appearing in ( [ aaa3 ] ) .
@xmath36 substituting ( [ aaa4 ] ) in ( [ aaa3 ] ) and eliminating the variable @xmath37 in the resultant equations by using ( [ aaa5 ] ) one gets two polynomials equations in @xmath27 . now equating each coefficients of @xmath38 and @xmath39 to zero
one obtains a set of algebraic equations for the parameters @xmath31 and @xmath32 . solving these algebraic equations one can get exact values for these coefficients .
@xmath40 substituting the values of @xmath31 and @xmath32 and @xmath41 and the general solution of ( [ aaa5 ] ) in ( [ aaa4 ] ) one can obtain three different types of travelling wave solutions for the given system of nonlinear pdes .
in this section , we apply the method described in the previous section to the nonlinear pdes ( [ qqq6 ] ) and construct exact solutions . substituting ( [ aaa2 ] ) into ( [ qqq6 ] )
we get the following system of ordinary differential equations ( odes ) , namely @xmath42 suppose that the solution of odes ( [ qqq9 ] ) can be expressed by a polynomial in @xmath27 which is of the form ( [ aaa4 ] ) . substituting ( [ aaa4 ] ) and their derivatives in ( [ qqq9 ] ) and performing the homogeneous balance between @xmath43 and @xmath44 and @xmath45 with @xmath46 in resultant equation we find @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
so we fix the polynomials ( [ aaa4 ] ) be of the form @xmath49 substituting the expressions ( [ qqq13 ] ) and their derivatives in ( [ qqq9 ] ) and rearranging the resultant equation in the descending powers of @xmath50 we arrive at @xmath51\big(\frac{g'}{g}\big)^3+[3\alpha_1\lambda - c\alpha_1+k\alpha_1 ^ 2+\frac{\alpha_1 ^ 2}{\sqrt{\delta}}-3\alpha_1 ^ 2\alpha_0-\alpha_1\beta_1]\big(\frac{g'}{g}\big)^2 & & \nonumber \\ + [ ( 2\mu+\lambda^2)\alpha_1-c\lambda \alpha_1-\beta\alpha_1 + 2k\alpha_0\alpha_1+\frac{2\alpha_1\alpha_0}{\sqrt{\delta}}-3\alpha_0 ^ 2\alpha_1-\alpha_1\beta_0-\alpha_0\beta_1]\big(\frac{g'}{g}\big ) & & \nonumber \\ + ( \mu \alpha_1\lambda - c\mu \alpha_1-\beta \alpha_0+\alpha_0 ^ 2+\frac{\alpha_0 ^ 2}{\sqrt{\delta}}-\alpha_0 ^ 3-\alpha_0\beta_0 ) = 0 , \qquad \qquad \qquad\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath52\big(\frac{g'}{g}\big)^3+[3\beta_1\lambda - c\beta_1+k\alpha_1\beta_1 - 3\delta\beta_1 ^ 2\beta_0]\big(\frac{g'}{g}\big)^2 & & \nonumber \\ + [ ( 2\mu+\lambda^2)\beta_1-c\lambda \beta_1-\beta\beta_1+k\alpha_0\beta_1+k\alpha_1\beta_0 - 3\delta\beta_0 ^ 2\beta_1]\big(\frac{g'}{g}\big ) & & \nonumber \\ + ( \mu \beta_1\lambda - c\mu \beta_1-\beta \beta_0+k\alpha_0\beta_0-\delta\beta_0 ^ 3 ) = 0 .
\qquad \qquad \end{aligned}\ ] ] equating the coefficients of @xmath38 , @xmath53 to zero in equations ( [ qqq15 ] ) and ( [ qqq16 ] ) we get the following set of algebraic equations , namely @xmath54 solving the above system of algebraic equations ( [ qqa17 ] ) and ( [ qqa18 ] ) we obtain two sets of values for the constants @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 and @xmath41 : @xmath59 @xmath60 since both the sets separately satisfy the algebraic equations in @xmath61 and @xmath62 they individually form a compatible solution . from each
set we derive an exact solution for the nonlinear pdes ( [ qqq6 ] ) . to begin with
let us take the values given in @xmath63 with the values given in @xmath64 , the solution @xmath65 reads @xmath66 it is known that the linear damped harmonic oscillator equation ( [ aaa5 ] ) admits three different types of solutions depending on the values of @xmath67 and @xmath32 , namely case 1 : @xmath68 @xmath69 case 2:@xmath70 @xmath71 case 3 : @xmath72 @xmath73 substituting ( [ qa17])-([qa19 ] ) into ( [ qqq19 ] ) we arrive at the following form of solutions , namely case 1 : @xmath74 @xmath75 ) shown for time @xmath76 ; when @xmath77 ; parameters are @xmath78 , @xmath79 , @xmath80 , @xmath81 , @xmath82 , @xmath83 . ] ) shown for time @xmath84 ; when @xmath85 ; parameters are @xmath86 , @xmath87 , @xmath88 , @xmath89 , @xmath82 , @xmath90 . ] ) shown for time @xmath91 ; when @xmath92 ; parameters are @xmath80 , @xmath93 , @xmath94 , @xmath82 , @xmath83 . ]
case 2 : @xmath95 @xmath96 case 3 : @xmath97 @xmath98 where @xmath99 , @xmath100 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 are arbitrary constants . for the second set of values we end up with the same form of solution with the only difference in the values in the parameters @xmath41 , @xmath5 and @xmath67 : case 1 : @xmath103 @xmath104 case 2 : @xmath105 @xmath106 case 3 : @xmath97 @xmath107 where @xmath108 , @xmath109 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 are arbitrary constants .
in this paper , we have constructed exact solutions for a diffusive predator - prey system which is modeled by a system of two coupled nonlinear pdes . using the @xmath0 expansion method ,
we have derived exact solutions for two different wave speeds .
the solutions that we have obtained are singular and can not be taken at face value describing actual situations in ecology .
notwithstanding they present a very interesting property : depending on the sign of @xmath110 , the nature of the solution changes from a single structure to a periodic one , which is akin to pattern forming systems .
we express @xmath110 in terms of the original parameters in the equation , we get @xmath111 . therefore , if @xmath112 we have a single structure like in fig.(1 ) . and if @xmath113 we have a periodic structure .
the meaning of @xmath2 is that it measures the gain in natality obtained by the predator , and @xmath5 is its mortality .
it follows that periodic structure formation comes from the strength of mortality . in a more intuitive way ,
@xmath114 is the inverse of the typical time for a predator population to decay in absence of preys .
if this time is short , we have a periodic pattern , the population continuously decaying and recovering . if this time is long , a smoother dynamics shows up .
the equations for which we could find new solutions , besides the previously known , @xcite , have the obvious drawback that matching of coefficients is necessary .
this is the same situation in most cases in the subject of exact solutions for reaction - diffusion equations , beyond the specific cases of interest in biology , @xcite .
however , the broad view insight gained remains of interest as the systems considered contain many elements of more realistic , non solvable ones . * *
rak and ms wish to thank cnpq ( brazil ) and dst ( india ) for the financial support through major research projects . | paper derive solutions for diffusive predator - prey system positive parameters @xmath6 denote partial derivatives equations expressed in dimensionless variables scaling of space time introduced simple form biological meaning term discussed in @xcite model predator - prey kind @xmath8 @xmath9 densities of prey and predator spatial redistribution population governed by diffusive dynamics both species same diffusivities absence predator temporal dynamics prey density allee type small populations not viable predator population negatively affects prey population predator population dependent on prey availability only term represents growth population @xmath10 term @xmath2 gain in natality due to prey consumption parameters @xmath5 @xmath4 represent per capita mortality rate of prey predator linear small populations @xmath11 closure relation effects higher trophic levels investigate dynamics diffusive predator - prey system authors assumed relations between parameters @xmath12 @xmath13assumed per capita mortality prey predator equal biomass production lower level consistent with biomass assimilation upper level eq . ( [ qqq1 ] ) reads @xmath14 consider predator - prey system ( [ qqq6 ] ) construct exact analytic solutions equation qqq6 ] ) understand properties different parametric values employ @xmath0 expansion method applied to nonlinear evolutionary equations demonstrate utility exploring dynamics diffusive predator - prey system @xmath0 equation qqq6 ] obtain exact solutions for two wave speeds [ qqq17 [ qqq18 ] three types of exact solutions plan paper sec 2 @xmath0 expansion method 3 consider eq . ( [ qqq6 ] ) derive exact solutions present conclusion sec discuss method finding exact solutions nonlinear partial differential equations using @xmath15-expansion method system nonlinear pdes form @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 unknown functions @xmath19 @xmath20 polynomials @xmath17 partial derivatives @xmath15 expansion method involves four steps@xmath21 introduce travelling wave reduction @xmath22 pde aaa1 ] becomes @xmath23 prime differentiation new variable @xmath24 @xmath25 solution @xmath26 polynomial @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 solution second order linear damped harmonic oscillator equation @xmath30 @xmath31 constants positive integers @xmath4 substituting aaa4 ] ) aaa3 ] ) balance highest order derivative nonlinear terms aaa3 ] @xmath36 substituting aaa4 ] ) aaa3 ] ) eliminating variable @xmath37 [ aaa5 ] ) two polynomials equations @xmath27 equating coefficients @xmath38 @xmath39 to zero obtains algebraic equations parameters @xmath31 @xmath32 exact values coefficients @xmath40 substituting values @xmath31 @xmath41 solution [ aaa5 ] ) aaa4 ] ) three travelling wave solutions nonlinear pdes apply method nonlinear pdes ( [ qqq6 ] ) construct exact solutionssubstituting [ aaa2 ] into qqq6 ] ) differential equations @xmath42 solution [ qqq9 ] expressed polynomial @xmath27 form ( [ aaa4 ] ) substituting [ aaa4 ] derivatives qqq9 ] ) balance between @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48fix polynomials aaa4 @xmath49 expressions qqq13 derivatives qqq9 rearranging equation descending powers @xmath50 @xmath51\big(^3+[3\alpha_1\alpha_1+k\alpha_1 2+\frac\alpha_1\delta}}-3\alpha_1 2\alpha_0-\alpha_1\beta_1^2\nonumber 2\mu+\lambda^2)\alpha_1-c\lambda\alpha_1-\beta\alpha_1 2k\alpha_0\alpha_1+\frac{2\alpha_1\delta}}-3\alpha_0 2\alpha_1-\alpha_1\beta_0-\beta_1\big \nonumber\alpha_1\lambda\alpha_1-\beta\alpha_0+\alpha_0 2+\frac{\alpha_0\delta}}-\alpha_0 3-\alpha_0\beta_0 = 0 @xmath52^3+[3\beta_1\lambda c\beta_1+k\alpha_1 - 3\delta\beta_1 2\beta_0]\big^2 \nonumber 2\mu+\lamb\beta_1-c\lambda -+k\alpha_0_0 - 3\delta\beta_0 ^ 2\beta_1]\big(\frac{g'}{g}\big ) \nonumber + \beta_1\lambda - c\mu \beta_1-\beta _0+k\alpha_0_0-\delta\beta_0 ^ 3 ) = 0 . \qquad{aligned} equating coefficients @xmath38 @xmath53 to zero equations algebraic equations @xmath54 solving two sets values constants @xmath55 @xmath41 : @xmath59 @xmath60 sets satisfy equations @xmath61 @xmath62 form compatible solution each set exact solution nonlinear pdes ( [ qqq6 ] )take values @xmath63 @xmath64 solution @xmath65 reads @xmath66 linear damped harmonic oscillator equation aaa5 admits three solutions @xmath67 @xmath32 1 @xmath68 @xmath69 2:@xmath70 @xmath71 3 @xmath72 @xmath73 substituting [ qa17])-([qa19 ] ) into ( [ qqq19 ] ) solutions 1 : @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 parameters @xmath78 @xmath84 @xmath85 parameters @xmath86 @xmath91 @xmath92 parameters @xmath80 case 2 : @xmath95 @xmath96 3 : @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 arbitrary constants second set values same solution difference parameters @xmath41 @xmath5 @xmath67 case 1 : @xmath103 @xmath104 2 : @xmath105 @xmath106 3 : @xmath97 @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath101 @xmath102 arbitrary constantspaper constructed solutions for diffusive predator - prey system modeled by two coupled nonlinear pdes using @xmath0 expansion method derived solutions for two different wave speeds solutions obtained singular not face value actual situations ecology interesting property depending on sign of @xmath110 solution changes from single to periodic akin to pattern forming systems express @xmath110 in original parameters get @xmath111 if @xmath112 single structure fig.(1 ) @xmath113 periodic structure @xmath2 measures gain natality predator @xmath5 mortality periodic structure formation from strength mortality @xmath114 inverse of typical time for predator population to decay in absence preys if time short periodic pattern population continuously decaying recovering if time long smoother dynamics equations for new solutions matching of coefficients necessary same situation in most exact solutions for reaction - diffusion equations broad view insight remains of interest systems considered contain realistic non solvable ones rak ms thank cnpq ( brazil ) dst ( india ) for financial support major research projects | 0.493688 | 2,863 | 1,531 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,862 | we discuss the anisotropic arrival directions of the ultra high energy cosmic rays detected by auger which i consider one of the biggest discoverie in astrophysics during the last year . | as you may conclude from the different concluding remarks at this meeting there are various approaches to doing them .
most of my esteemed colleagues spoke on several topic that they consider important now and in the future .
i decided to concentrate on one single topic that excited not only me but a large number of astrophysicists that were never interested in ultra high energy cosmic rays ( uhecr ) - the observed correlation of the highest energy events detected by the pierre auger observatory in argentina with active galactic nuclei ( agn ) @xcite .
this discovery marked the beginning of a new type of astronomy - cosmic ray astronomy - that may become as important in the future as the tev gamma ray astronomy has recently become .
tev gamma ray astronomy does not only reveal the type of the gamma ray sources , it also provides an indirect measurement of the infrared / optical background whose estimates are based on theoretical calculations involving the light emission of different types of stars and galaxies and the cosmological evolution of these objects and the matter density around them in the universe .
cosmic ray astronomy also involves some general features of the nearby universe that are otherwise extremely difficult to measure such as the local ( within 200 mpc ) distribution of matter and different powerful astrophysical objects , the average strength of the intergalactic magnetic fields ( that could even be mapped when the sources are confirmed ) and the galactic ones .
i will discuss these results and report on the small contribution that i have made to this topic .
it is not connected to the type of the uhecr sources , but includes a better than 3@xmath0 confirmation of the anisotropy detected by auger @xcite .
the auger collaboration reported a correlation of their 27 highest energy events ( e @xmath1 5.7@xmath210@xmath3 ev ( 57 eev ) with active galactic nuclei ( agn ) at redshifts @xmath4 less than 0.017 @xcite from the vron - cetty and vron catalog @xcite ( v - c ) .
twenty out of 27 events are within 3.1@xmath5 of individual agn , while for isotropic arrival distribution one expects on average 5 coincidences .
five of the non - correlating events come from less than 12@xmath5 galactic latitude which may be understood as larger deflections in the galactic magnetic field .
the scattering in the galactic magnetic field is consisten with these events being protons , not heavier nuclei .
it is surprising that there are no events coming from the direction of the virgo cluster , that includes a large number of powerful galaxies in addition to m87 , as stated in ref .
@xcite .
a better description of the statistical analysis and a broad discussion if its features is given in the longer second paper @xcite .
the self correlation between the 27 events was studied and found to be consistent with the existence of many ( more than 61 ) sources within the 71 mpc radius , that leads to a source density of 3.5@xmath210@xmath6 mpc@xmath7 .
the auger collaboration warns us that because most of the correlating agn are not very powerful the observed anisotropy may be due to a different type of source .
it is quite interesting that two auger events coincide with the close by ( less than 4 mpc ) powerful radio galaxy cen a , and several other events are close to it . among
the criticism toward this analysis is the statement that redshift @xmath4 of 0.017 is much lower than the expected contribution of redshifts for extragalactic protons and nuclei .
protons are supposed to come to us from redshifts up to 0.05 , roughly distances to 200 mpc .
other authors complain about the types of agn in the v - c catalog that are low luminosity seyfert and liner galaxies .
since i do not have much knowledge about agn i decided to check the discovered anisotropy by studying the correlation of the auger events with the supergalactic plane ( sgp ) .
a report on the correlation of the then existing statistics of uhecr of energy above 4@xmath210@xmath3 ev with the supergalactic plane @xcite was published in 1995 @xcite .
the data set consisted mostly of events detected by the haverah park detector with the addition of events detected by agasa , yakutsk and volcano ranch air shower arrays .
the anisotropy of that data set was studied by a comparison of the average and rms supergalactic latitudes @xmath8 of the experimental events to that of an isotropic monte carlo sample .
the significance of the correlation was at the 3@xmath0 level .
later on , when the agasa detector dominated the world s statistics , the significance of the correlation decreased .
we decided to check on the correlation of the 27 auger events with the same definition of the nearby large scale mass distribution . the result is shown in fig . [ auger17 ] .
the probability for such a correlation was calculated with a monte carlo simulation where 100,000 sets of 27 events were injected isotropically in the auger field of view .
we arbitrarily chose to bands of 10@xmath5 and 15@xmath5 in supergalactic latitude that surround the 1@xmath0 deviation of the agn from the v - c catalog to the sgp .
nine ( 13 ) of the 27 experimental events fall in these two bands .
the random coincidence probability derived from the monte carlo is 0.024 ( 0.008 ) corresponding to 2.0 ( 2.4 ) @xmath0 . until now we dealt with the original definition @xcite of the supergalactic plane by de vaucouleurs .
this definition was studied in 2000 by lahav et al . in terms of redshift
@xcite on the basis of the optical redshift survey ( ors ) ( 8457 galaxies , 98% with redshift ) . since ors had a zone of avoidance of @xmath9 20@xmath5 it was complemented with iras galaxies in order to describe better the intersection of sgp with the galactic plane .
this study introduces correction to the definition of sgp for different distances from 0 to 80 mpc .
the one that is most suitable for analysis of the auger events is for distances up to 70 mpc , i.e. identical to the redshift of 0.017 .
the corrected shape of the sgp is plotted in fig .
[ auger16 ] the same way as the original definition is plotted in fig .
[ auger17 ] . respectively .
the probability to have so many events from isotropic arrival direction distribution drops to 1.6@xmath210@xmath10 ( 6.0@xmath210@xmath10 ) for distances from the supergalactic plane of 10@xmath5(15@xmath5 ) .
the correlation of the auger events with the updated definition of the sgp within 70 mpc is indeed much more significant - the probabilities above correspond to 3.6(3.2)@xmath0 . since the rotation angle of sgp in galactic coordinates in the analysis of lahav et al .
depends on the the redshifts of the astrophysical objects the one we used certainly defines better the plane of weight of the mass distribution within 70 mpc and of the uhecr sources if these cosmic rays indeed are produced within this distance .
even if the gzk horizon is larger we expect some degree of correlation with the nearby astrophysical objects .
it is important to note that the hires collaboration does not confirm the correlation with agn @xcite . out of 13 highest energy events
only two correlate with agn from the v - c catalog within 3.1@xmath5 .
the hires paper does not describe well their field of view and it is difficult to understand if the difference in the field of view is the reason for this discreapancy . there is also a lack of obvious correlation with sgp .
three ( 5 ) of the hires events are within 10@xmath5 ( 15@xmath5 ) of the sgp in the definition of ref .
@xcite .
we still believe that the anisotropy published by the auger collaboration is strong and with the increase of the experimental statistics , which must have doubled by august 2008 , it will lead us to identification of the sources of the highest energy cosmic rays .
99 the auger collaboration ( j. abraham et al . ) , science 318:938 ( 2007 ) the auger collaboration ( j. abraham et al . ) , astropart .
phys . 29:188 ( 2008 )
t. stanev , arxiv:0805.1746 m .- p .
vron - cetty & p. vron , a&a * 455 * , 773 ( 2006 ) d.s .
gorbunov et al . , arxiv:0804.1088 ( 2008 ) g. de vaucouleurs et al . , the third catalogue of bright galaxies ( rc3 ) university of texas press , austin ( 1991 ) t. stanev et al .
75*:305 ( 1995 ) o. lahav et al . , mnras , * 312 * 166 ( 2000 ) hires collaboration ( r.u .
abbasi et al ) , arxiv:0804.0382 | conclude from concluding remarks at meeting various approaches colleagues spoke on topic important future concentrate on one topic excited large astrophysicists ultra high energy cosmic rays uhecr ) - correlation of highest energy events pierre auger observatory argentina with active galactic nuclei @xcite discovery beginning new astronomy - cosmic ray astronomy important future as tev gamma ray astronomy tev gamma ray astronomy type gamma ray sources provides indirect measurement of infrared / optical background estimates based on theoretical calculations light emission of stars galaxies cosmological evolution matter density cosmic ray astronomy involves general features universe local distribution of matter powerful astrophysical objects average strength of intergalactic magnetic fields galactic ones discuss results report small contribution to topic not connected to type uhecr sources includes better than 3@xmath0 confirmation of anisotropy detected by auger @xcite auger collaboration reported correlation of 27 highest energy events with active galactic nuclei agn ) at redshifts @xmath4 less than 0.017 @xcite from vron - cetty vron catalog27 events within 3.1@xmath5 of agn isotropic arrival distribution expects 5 coincidences five non - correlating events from less than 12@xmath5 galactic latitude larger deflections in galactic magnetic field scattering with events being protons not heavier nuclei no events from virgo cluster powerful galaxies m87 in ref @xcite in paper self correlation between 27 events consistent with 61 sources within 71 mpc radius source density of 3.5@xmath210@xmath6 mpc@xmath7 auger collaboration warns correlating agn not powerful anisotropy may be due to different source two auger events coincide with powerful radio galaxy cen a several other events close to criticism redshift @xmath4 of 0.017 lower than expected contribution for extragalactic protons and nuclei protons from redshifts up to 0.05 200 mpc authors complain about agn in v - c catalog low luminosity seyfert and liner galaxies to check anisotropy by studying correlation of auger events with supergalactic plane ( sgp )report on correlation statistics uhecr energy above 4@xmath210 with supergalactic plane @xcite published 1995 data set haverah park detector agasa yakutsk volcano ranch air shower arrays anisotropy studied average rms supergalactic latitudes events to isotropic monte carlo sample significance correlation at 3@xmath0 level agasa detector significance decreased correlation 27 auger events with nearby large scale mass distribution result shown in fig . auger17 ] probability correlation calculated with monte carlo simulation 100,000 sets of 27 events field chose bands 10@xmath5 15@xmath5 supergalactic latitude 1@xmath0 deviation agn from v - c catalog to sgp nine ( 13 ) of 27 events in these bands random coincidence probability carlo 0.024 ( 0.008 ) 2.0 ( 2.4 ) @xmath0 original definition supergalactic plane by de vaucouleurs studied 2000 by lahav et al . redshift @xcite optical redshift survey ) 8457 galaxies 98% with redshift@xmath5 complemented with iras galaxies intersection sgp with galactic planestudy introduces correction definition sgp for distances 0 to 80 mpc suitable for auger events distances up to 70 mpc identical to redshift 0.017 corrected shape sgp plotted in fig auger16 original probability events from isotropic arrival drops to 1.6@xmath210@xmath10 ( 6.0@xmath210 ) for distances from supergalactic plane 10@xmath5(15@xmath5 ) correlation auger events with updated definition sgp within 70 mpc more significant probabilities correspond to 3.6(3.2)@xmath0 rotation angle sgp in galactic coordinates depends on redshifts astrophysical objects defines better plane weight mass distribution within 70 mpc uhecr sources rays produced gzk horizon larger expect correlation with nearby astrophysical objects hires collaboration confirm correlation with agn @xcite 13 events two correlate with agn within 3.1@xmath5 paper field difficult understand lack of obvious correlation with sgp three ( 5 ) hires events within 10@xmath5 ( 15@xmath5 ) of sgp in definition @xcitebelieve anisotropy auger collaboration strong increase experimental statistics doubled august 2008 lead identification sources highest energy cosmic rays auger collaboration j abraham science 318:938 2007 astropart . . 29:188 2008 t. stanev arxiv:0805.1746 vron - cetty vron a&a * 455 773 2006 ) gorbunov arxiv:0804.1088 2008 g. de vaucouleurs third catalogue bright galaxies university texas press austin 1991 t stanev al 75*:305 1995 ) o. lahav mnras 312 * 166 ( 2000 collaboration abbasi arxiv:0804.0382 | 0.323776 | 2,089 | 1,103 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,870 | we study point particles in 2 + 1 dimensional first order gravity using a triangulation to fix the connection and frame - field .
the hamiltonian is reduced to a boundary term which yields the total mass .
the triangulation is dynamical with non - trivial transitions occurring when a particle meets an edge .
this framework facilitates a description in terms of the loop gravity phase space . | three dimensional gravity has often been used as a toy model for the four dimensional theory . here
we study point particles in 2 + 1 dimensions using spatial geometries analogous to those in @xcite .
these geometries are isomorphic to a gauge - reduced holonomy - flux phase space which descends from the @xmath0 limit of a loop quantum gravity hilbert space .
we consider a hamiltonian written in terms of frame - field and connection variables . the spacetime signature is taken to be euclidean since the relevant gauge group is then @xmath1 , as in 3 + 1 dimensions with lorentzian signature .
our first step is to specify the variables over an entire spacelike slice using a triangulation where particles sit on the vertices .
after gauge fixing , the hamiltonian is reduced to a boundary term which equals the total particle mass . in this gauge
the triangulation evolves according to particle momenta and undergoes discrete changes when a particle meets an edge , collapsing one of the triangles .
spacetime is taken to be @xmath2 where @xmath3 is a spacelike surface homeomorphic to a disc .
the first order formalism of general relativity parameterizes the gravitational field in terms of a connection @xmath4 and a frame - field @xmath5 , both being one - forms on @xmath3 taking values in the @xmath6 algebra .
we use @xmath6 basis elements @xmath7 ( for @xmath8 ) which are given by @xmath9 times the pauli matrices .
our notation is such that elements of @xmath6 are written as @xmath10 , for example , and all internal indices are written as superscripts . in units where @xmath11 a hamiltonian for pure gravity is given by @xcite : [ hamiltonian ] h & = & - _ ( n^i f^i + ^i g^i ) + _ n^i a^i , + f^i & = & a^i + ^ijk a^j a^k , + g^i & = & e^i + ^ijk a^j e^k . @xmath12 and @xmath13 are lagrange multipliers for the flatness and gauss constraints respectively .
we normalize the time coordinate by choosing @xmath14 . the boundary term and the condition
@xmath15 ensure that the variational principal is well - defined and the constraints are first class .
the poisson algebra is : \{a_a^i(x ) , e_b^j(y ) } & = & _ ab ^ij ^2(x - y ) , where @xmath16 labels the space coordinates .
it is well - known that in 2 + 1 dimensions point particles represent conical singularities @xcite .
we introduce particles by replacing the flatness constraint with @xmath17 so that each particle @xmath18 gives a contribution to the curvature proportional to its momentum @xmath19 at the location @xmath20 @xcite . in this treatment the particles
are defined by the fields @xmath21 and do not have independent parameters of their own .
we consider the total mass to be less than @xmath22 so that @xmath3 is open @xcite .
in order to solve the constraints and reduce the hamiltonian , we triangulate @xmath3 according to the particle locations so that we may give a piecewise definition of @xmath21 on @xmath23
. see @xcite for other approaches along these lines . for clarity , we take the boundary @xmath24 to be triangular ; the generalization to arbitrary polygons follows simply .
we take each particle position to be an internal vertex and connect all vertices with straight edges to obtain a triangulation .
there is ambiguity in this procedure , but the number of triangles @xmath25 is fixed by the number of particles @xmath26 to be @xmath27 via the euler characteristic for planar graphs .
different triangulations generally lead to different gauge choices . within each triangle @xmath28 , we must choose @xmath29 such that @xmath30 .
the general solution @xcite is given by an @xmath1 group element @xmath31 and a closed one - form @xmath32 : [ solutions ] _
= a_a_^-1 , _
= a__a_^-1 .
consider two adjacent triangles labeled @xmath33 and @xmath34 .
we ensure that the fields are continuous across the shared edge @xmath35 by requiring that there exists an @xmath36 on the edge such that : [ gluing ] .
a_2 |_e = .a_1 h_e |_e , .
_ 2|_e = . h_e^-1
_ 1 h_e |_e .
now , if we integrate the curvature over a region containing a single vertex @xmath18 we must obtain @xmath37 . in order to specify the group elements
@xmath31 we subdivide each triangle into three regions defined by edges joining the centroid to the vertices .
consider one such region @xmath38 where points @xmath39 are the endpoints of an edge , and @xmath40 is the centroid of the triangle .
we define : u = ^-1 ( v_+ ) + ^-1 ( v_- ) , where @xmath41 .
note that the line @xmath42 coincides with the edge , and @xmath43 consists of lines between the centroid of the triangle and the endpoints of the edge .
we set the group element in a region equal to : [ gena ] a__r(u)= ( _ 0^u f ( ) ) , where we have introduced a bump function @xmath44 which satisfies @xmath45 . for a given @xmath46
, this group element defines a rotation about a direction @xmath47 by an angle proportional to @xmath48 . with these ingredients
it is now possible to choose a gauge , i.e. to specify the frame - field and connection on @xmath23 . given a set of particles @xmath49 , one first defines a boundary and introduces a triangulation .
then we arbitrarily choose a triangle ( labeled 1 ) and make a choice for @xmath50 . moving to a neighbouring triangle
, we specify @xmath51 here and use ( [ gluing ] ) to find @xmath52 .
we continue in this manner until @xmath53 ( and thereby @xmath54 are defined in each triangle , taking care to ensure the connection yields proper curvature at each vertex by choosing the parameter @xmath55 in each @xmath56 to be consistent with particle momenta .
the aforementioned relationship between the number of triangles and the number of particles ensures that this procedure will work for arbitrarily many particles .
see @xcite for a more detailed description of this process .
preserving the gauge dynamically leads to a condition on the lagrange multipliers : [ condition ] _ a n^i + ^ijke^j^k = 0 .
this fixes three of the six degrees of freedom in @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
we eliminate the remaining ambiguity by choosing @xmath57 and setting @xmath58 .
this choice ensures that particles move along with the triangulation and remain at the vertices .
after specifying @xmath21 , the hamiltonian is reduced to a boundary term which evaluates to : h & = & _
n^i a^i = _ n^i _ a a^i + & = & _ n^i(q _ ) p_^i = _ m _ , where we used stokes theorem , the conditions on @xmath59 , and the flatness constraint .
dynamics are implicitly determined by the direction of momentum @xmath60 for each particle via the equation of motion : _
^i(t ) = q_^i(0 ) + t n^i(q _ ) , and the triangulation evolves accordingly .
non - trivial , discrete transitions occur when a particle meets an edge
. consider triangles @xmath33 and @xmath34 depicted in fig .
[ transition ] . before and after a discrete change in triangulation .
@xmath61 label the three regions of each triangle .
grey regions ( bounded by constant-@xmath46 lines ) indicate where the connection is generally non - zero . ]
if the particle at the top of the left hand side of the figure moves downward until it reaches the shared edge , then @xmath33 closes and @xmath34 splits into @xmath62 and @xmath63 ( shown on the right hand side ) preserving the total number of triangles .
the fields are defined in the new triangles by specifying the @xmath1 rotation parameters : & & _ 1^ _ = _ 1 _ + _ 2 _ + _ 1 _ , _ 1^ _ = _ 2 _ , + & & _ 2_^
= _ 1 _ + _ 2 _ + _ 1 _ , _
2_^ = _ 2 _ , + & & _ 1_^ = _ 2_^ = 0 .
notice @xmath64 along the new edge shared by @xmath62 and @xmath63 so that @xmath65 .
the fields in all other triangles are unaffected by this transition .
we have described a system of point particles in 2 + 1 dimensional gravity in terms of evolving triangulations .
a gauge choice for @xmath66 was specified by choosing @xmath31 and @xmath32 in each triangle .
the triangulation evolves according to particle dynamics so that particles remain at vertices at all times .
the discrete change in triangulation that occurs when a vertex meets an edge is well - defined
. this construction yields spatial geometries that are the two - dimensional analog of those in @xcite .
having @xmath53 in each triangle allows us to immediately write this data in terms of holonomy - flux variables .
moreover , knowing how @xmath53 behave under a discrete change in triangulation tells us how the holonomies and fluxes will change .
this sets the stage for a semiclassical loop gravity description of the system @xcite . | three dimensional gravity model four dimensional theory study point particles 2 + 1 dimensions geometries @xcite geometries isomorphic to gauge - reduced holonomy - flux phase space from @xmath0 limit loop quantum gravity hilbert space consider hamiltonian frame - field connection variables spacetime signature euclidean gauge group @xmath1 3 + 1 dimensions specify variables spacelike slice triangulation particles on vertices hamiltonian reduced to boundary term particle mass triangulation evolves particle momenta changes particle meets edge spacetime @xmath2 @xmath3 spacelike surface homeomorphic to disc first order formalism general relativity parameterizes gravitational field connection @xmath4 frame - field @xmath5 one - forms on @xmath3 @xmath6 algebra use @xmath6 basis elements @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 pauli matrices elements @xmath6 written as @xmath10 internal indices superscripts@xmath11 hamiltonian gravity @xcite hamiltonian h n^i f^i + ^i g^i n^i a^i f^i a^i ^ijk a^j a^k g^i e^i ^ijk^j^k @xmath12 @xmath13 lagrange multipliers flatness gauss constraints normalize time coordinate @xmath14 boundary term condition @xmath15 variational principal defined constraints first class poisson algebra \{a_a^i(x ) , e_b^j(y ) } ab ^ij ^2(x - y ) @xmath16 labels space coordinates 2 + 1 dimensions point particles represent conical singularities introduce particles flatness constraint @xmath17 particle @xmath18 curvature proportional momentum @xmath19 location @xmath20 @xcite particles defined by fields @xmath21 independent parameters total mass less than @xmath22 @xmath3 open @xcite solve constraints reduce hamiltonian triangulate @xmath3 particle locations piecewise definition @xmath21 @xmath23 @xcite approaches boundary @xmath24 triangular generalization arbitrary polygons particle position internal vertex connect vertices straight edges triangulationambiguity in procedure number triangles @xmath25 fixed by particles @xmath26 @xmath27 via euler characteristic graphs different triangulations lead to different gauge choices each triangle @xmath28 choose @xmath29 @xmath30 solution by @xmath1 group element @xmath31 closed one - form @xmath32_a_^-1 two adjacent triangles @xmath33 and @xmath34 fields continuous across edge @xmath35 @xmath36 on edge integrate curvature over region single vertex @xmath18 obtain @xmath37 specify group elements @xmath31 subdivide triangle into three regions by edges joining centroid vertices one region @xmath38 points @xmath39 endpoints of edge @xmath40 centroid define u = ^-1 ( v_+ ) + ^-1 ( v_- ) @xmath41 line @xmath42 coincides with edge @xmath43 lines between centroid endpoints set group element in region equal to a__r(u)= ( 0^u f ( introduced bump function @xmath44 satisfies @xmath45@xmath46 defines rotation direction @xmath47 angle proportional to @xmath48 possible choose gauge specify frame - field connection @xmath23 particles @xmath49 defines boundary introduces triangulation choose triangle 1 choice @xmath50 neighbouring triangle specify @xmath51 gluing find @xmath52 continue until @xmath53 @xmath54 defined each triangle connection yields curvature vertex choosing parameter @xmath55 @xmath56 consistent particle momenta relationship number triangles particles ensures procedure many particles @xcite detailed description preserving gauge leads condition lagrange multipliers a n^i + ^ijke^j^k = 0 fixes three six degrees freedom in @xmath12 @xmath13 eliminate ambiguity choosing @xmath57 setting @xmath58 ensures particles move triangulation remain at vertices specifying @xmath21 hamiltonian reduced boundary term evaluates h & = _ n^i a^i = n^i a^i + & = n^i(q _ ) p_^i = _ m _ used stokes theorem conditions @xmath59 flatness constraintdynamics determined by direction momentum @xmath60 for each particle via equation motion : ^i(t ) = q_^i(0 ) + t n^i(q _ ) triangulation evolves discrete transitions occur when particle meets edge consider triangles @xmath33 @xmath34 in fig . transition before after discrete change in triangulation @xmath61 label three regions each triangle grey regions indicate connection non - zero if particle moves downward until shared edge @xmath33 closes @xmath34 splits into @xmath62 @xmath63 preserving total number triangles fields defined in new triangles by @xmath1 rotation parameters notice @xmath64 along new edge shared by @xmath62 @xmath63 fields in other triangles unaffected by transition described system of point particles in 2 + 1 dimensional gravity in evolving triangulations gauge choice for @xmath66 specified by choosing @xmath31 and @xmath32 in each triangle triangulation evolves according to particle dynamics particles remain at vertices discrete change in triangulation when vertex meets edgeconstruction yields spatial geometries analog @xcite @xmath53 in each triangle allows data holonomy - flux variables knowing @xmath53 change triangulation tells holonomies fluxes sets stage for semiclassical loop gravity description system @xcite | 0.352442 | 2,163 | 1,141 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,871 | the existence of an acoustic plasmon in extrinsic ( doped or gated ) monolayer graphene was found recently in an _ ab initio _ calculation with the frozen lattice [ m. pisarra _
et al . _ , arxiv:1306.6273 , 2013 ] . by the _
fully dynamic _ density - functional perturbation theory approach , we demonstrate a strong coupling of the acoustic plasmonic mode to lattice vibrations . thereby , the acoustic plasmon in graphene does not exist as an isolated excitation , but it is rather bound into a combined plasmon - phonon mode . we show that the coupling provides a mechanism for the _ bidirectional _ energy exchange between the electronic and the ionic subsystems with fundamentally , as well as practically , important implications for the lattice cooling and heating by electrons in graphene . known for its extraordinary properties and vast potential applications @xcite , graphene a two - dimensional crystal comprised of a honeycomb lattice of carbon atoms continues to receive much attention as it reveals new remarkable features @xcite . for one of the recent findings , an acoustic plasmon ( apl )
( plasmon with _ linear _ wave - vector dispersion ) has been predicted theoretically in an extrinsic free - standing monolayer graphene @xcite .
this finding is extraordinary considering that apl generation conventionally involves a surface state immersed in the bulk of a metal @xcite . exhibiting linear wave - vector dispersion , acoustic apl persists down to low frequencies , where it can be expected to interact with phonon oscillations .
the possibility of coupling these two types of elementary excitations motivates questions of fundamental physics as well as of potential applications . in this letter
we show that the apl - phonon coupling indeed occurs in the electron - doped graphene and it provides a mechanism for the bidirectional energy exchange between the electronic and ionic subsystems .
the conventional treatment of lattice vibrations by frequency - independent density - functional perturbation theory ( dfpt ) @xcite is inadequate for capturing the essentially dynamic nature of the coupled plasmon - phonon modes , and we therefore implement a fully _ dynamic _ approach treating the electron - hole , plasmon , and phonon elementary excitations on the equal footing @xcite . our _ ab initio _ calculations for monolayer graphene employ the full - potential linear augmented plane - wave ( fp - lapw ) code elk @xcite .
the super - cell geometry is utilized with a separation of the layers in the @xmath0 direction of 40 bohr , which effectively ensures the non - interaction between the layers .
the local - density approximation to the exchange - correlation potential @xcite is used .
_ acoustic - plasmon and phonons in graphene. _ we start by reproducing the apl and phonon spectra of graphene without the coupling of the two excitations . in fig .
[ plph ] , left panel , the energy - loss function of graphene is plotted for a number of equidistant values of the wave - vector .
the calculation with the carbon atoms fixed at their equilibrium positions has been used .
the apl can be easily recognized by the linear dispersion of the peak with the wave - vector , which is in agreement with the recent findings in extrinsic graphene obtained with the use of the pseudopotential method @xcite . in fig .
[ plph ] , right panel , we plot the phonon dispersion spectra in graphene together with the apl dispersion derived from the energy - loss function .
acoustic plasmonic and optical phononic ( oph ) dispersion curves intersect , which fact suggests their interaction and constitutes the main motivation of the subsequent study of the coupled modes .
[ h ! ] _ coupled plasmon - phonon modes. _ we treat the problem of coupled plasmon - phonon oscillations within the _ dynamic _ ( frequency - dependent ) linear - response theory : self - consistently , ions are driven by an externally applied ac electric field and by the coulomb field of moving electrons , and in turn , electrons move under the action of the external field and the field of moving ions .
we consider an infinite two - dimensional ( 2d ) crystal lying in the @xmath1 plane .
the 2d lattice vectors are denoted by @xmath2 while the position of the @xmath3-th atom within the unit cell is @xmath4 .
a weak external potential of the form @xmath5 is applied to the system , where @xmath6 is the 3d position coordinate vector and @xmath7 is the 2d wave - vector .
we seek the response _ including the ionic oscillations _ around their equilibrium positions with the displacements given by @xmath8 with 3d vectors @xmath9 .
the total coulomb potential in the system is @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the ground - state coulomb potential and @xmath12 is its first - order perturbation .
the force experienced by the @xmath3-th ion in the @xmath2-th unit cell is @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the charge of the @xmath3-th ion within the unit cell and @xmath15 is the total coulomb potential minus the self - interaction of the @xmath16-th ion @xmath17 expansion of eq .
( [ eff ] ) to the first order in the perturbation gives @xmath18 since @xmath19 where @xmath20 is the ground - state electron particle - density and @xmath21 is the equilibrium ions potential @xmath22 we can write for the force acting on the @xmath3-th ion in the @xmath23-th cell @xmath24 + \nabla \delta \phi^\textit{eff}_{\alpha\0v}(\rv,\omega ) \right\}_{\rv=\bv_\alpha } , \end{split } \label{fff}\ ] ] where the corresponding 0-th order term has been set to zero because ions are in their equilibrium positions in the crystal s ground - state .
the electronic response is governed by the equation @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the ionic displacement bare potential and @xmath27 is the nonlocal dielectric function of the ideal crystal .
based on eqs .
( [ f ] ) and ( [ b1 ] ) - ( [ bi ] ) , a rather lengthy algebra , which we have included in the appendix , leads to the following expression for the force @xmath28 e_{\beta k } , \end{split } \label{forced}\ ] ] where @xmath29 are the so called dynamic matrices of the conventional dfpt @xcite and @xmath30 \phi^\textit{ext}(\gv+\qv , z,\omega ) \right|_{z=0 } , \end{split}\ ] ] @xmath31 @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the interacting - particles density - response function of the ideal crystal , @xmath34 is the area of the unit cell , @xmath35 , \label{y}\ ] ] and @xmath36 is the unit vector in the @xmath0 direction . in eq .
( [ forced ] ) , the first two terms are due to the dynamically screened external force in the ideal crystal and the third term is the statically screened restoring force of the displacement of the ions .
the fourth term contains all the effects responsible for dynamic electron - phonon interaction . obviously , with the neglect of the latter ( @xmath37 in the fourth term ) , eq .
( [ forced ] ) reduces to the conventional static dfpt case @xcite . with the use of eq .
( [ disp ] ) , newton s second law gives for the @xmath3-th nucleus at the @xmath23-th unit cell @xmath38 equations ( [ forced ] ) - ( [ nl ] ) form a @xmath39 system of linear equations for @xmath40 unknowns @xmath41 , @xmath42 , where @xmath43 is the number of atoms in an elementary unit cell . energy absorbed by the unit cell of the lattice per unit time is @xmath44 _ calculations and results. _ we excite the system with the external potential @xmath45 and solve for the amplitudes of the oscillations @xmath9 using the above formalism with the random - phase approximation to the density - response matrix @xmath33 . in fig .
[ exyz ] , the amplitude of ionic oscillations is plotted as a function of the frequency for three values of the wave - vector .
the @xmath46-vector dependence of the @xmath1-polarized coupled excitation is strongly influenced by that of the apl and @xmath1-polarized oph , while the former is very different from the both latter .
two coupled modes originated from the @xmath1-polarized oph and apl are prominent .
first of them has a strong @xmath46-dispersion , while the second is bound in the vicinity of @xmath1-polarized oph .
both modes are blue - shifted compared with the apl and oph , respectively . for larger @xmath46 ( upper panel of fig .
[ exyz ] ) , the frequency of apl becomes too high for ions to follow the oscillations , leading to the coupled mode convergence to the apl .
the @xmath0-polarized mode remains practically non - dispersive and , acquiring a finite but small line - width , is pinned at the position of the corresponding oph . in fig .
[ w ] , we plot the energy absorbed by the unit cell of the lattice per unit time .
the remarkable feature in this figure is that , depending on the frequency range , the lattice either receives the energy ( positive @xmath47 ) or gives it away to the electronic subsystem ( negative @xmath47 ) . we anticipate that this phenomenon will be experimentally observable in two - terminal suspended graphene experiments .
for example , yien _ et al .
_ @xcite recently demonstrated the ability to distinguish electronic from phononic heat conduction in a self - heated suspended device .
the associated analysis of electron - phonon scattering did not , however , include plasmonic effects , which would be observable at moderate temperatures and under ac fields near the resonances predicted here .
it must be also noted that thorough understanding of apl - phonons interactions is particularly important in the field of superconductivity @xcite .
figure [ cpldisp ] , right panel , shows the @xmath46-vector dispersion derived from the ions oscillations amplitude dependence on the frequency ( left panel ) .
we conclude , that at smaller @xmath46-vectors , the acoustic - like linear dispersion of the coupled mode is lost , indicating that in this regime apl in graphene is an artefact of the frozen - lattice approximation .
the second branch of the coupled mode remains close and above the @xmath1-polarized oph , varying non - monotonically and eventually converging to the latter . in conclusion , we have implemented a fully dynamic ( frequency - dependent density - functional perturbation theory ) calculation of coupled electron - lattice oscillations in graphene .
the coupled mode behaves quite differently from the individual phonon and acoustic plasmon modes , previously known in graphene , and the former replaces the two latter , as acoustic plasmons and phonons do not exist in graphene by themselves , but they constitute a unified excitation of the electronic and ionic subsystems .
the coupling provides a mechanism for the transfer of energy between the electronic subsystem and the lattice , which is shown to go in both directions depending on the frequency range . from this
, promising pathways of tunable heating and cooling of the lattice by the electronic subsystem can be clearly previewed .
v.u.n . acknowledges the support from national science council , taiwan , grant no .
100 - 2112-m-001 - 025-my3 . t.s.f . acknowledges the support of the us office of naval research ( award # n000141211006 , pm : dr .
mark spector ) .
v.u.n .
and t.s.f .
are grateful for the hospitality of qatar environment and energy research institute , qatar foundation , qatar .
17ifxundefined [ 1 ] ifx#1 ifnum [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo ifx [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo
`` `` # 1''''@noop [ 0]secondoftwosanitize@url [ 0 ]
+ 12$12 & 12#1212_12%12@startlink[1]@endlink[0]@bib@innerbibempty @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1021/nl803395z [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.87.041405 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.88.045113 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop `` , '' ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.70.205403 [ * * , ( ) ] in @noop _ _ , ( , ) pp .
link:\doibase 10.1038/nphys477 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop link:\doibase 10.1017/s0305004100016108 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.45.13244 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.87.241411 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.28.681 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.71.121106 [ * * , ( ) ] | we perform the 2d fourier transform of eq .
( [ bi ] ) @xmath48 where the vector function @xmath49 is defined by eq .
( [ y ] ) .
inverting eq .
( [ res ] ) in the reciprocal space , we can write @xmath50 d z'.\ ] ] then we can write for the gradient of the effective potential @xmath51 \int \left\ { \epsilon^{-1}_{\gv\gv'}(\qv , z',\omega ) \phi^\textit{ext}(\gv'+\qv , z',\omega ) + \frac{2\pi } { s_0 } \times \right . \\ & \left .
\sum\limits_{\beta } z_\beta e^{-i(\gv ' + \qv ) \cdot \bv_\beta } \ ! \ ! \int \
! \left [ \epsilon^{-1}_{\gv\gv'}(\qv , z ' , \omega ) -\delta_{\gv\gv ' } \delta(z - z')\right ] \ev_\beta \cdot \yv(z',\gv'+\qv ) \right\}_{z=0 } \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! d z ' \left . \ ! - \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ !
\sum\limits_{(\beta\rv)\ne(\alpha\0v ) } \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! \ ! e^{i\qv\cdot\rv } \nabla ( \ev_\beta \ ! \cdot \ !
\nabla ) \frac{z_\beta}{|\rv \ ! - \
! \bv_\beta \ ! - \ !
\rv| } \right|_{\rv=\bv_\alpha } .
\end{split}\ ] ] noting that within the static approximation ( @xmath37 ) our theory reduces to the conventional density - functional perturbation theory ( dfpt ) @xcite , we can conveniently rewrite eq .
( [ force ] ) as eq .
( [ forced ] ) . | perform 2d fourier transform eq @xmath48 vector function @xmath49 defined eq inverting eq res reciprocal space write @xmath50 z' write gradient effective potential @xmath51\epsilon^{-1}\gv\gv'(\qv z'\omega ) \phi^\textit{ext}(\gv'+\qv z'\omega )\frac{2\pi } s_0 \right\left\sum\limits_{\beta z_\beta e{-i(\gv ' + \qv ) \bv_\beta\epsilon^{-1}\gv\gv'(\qv z '\omega ) -\delta{\gv\gv ' \delta(z - z')\right_\beta \yv(z',\gv'+\qv ) {z=0\ ! - \ ! \sum\limits_{(\beta\rv)\ne(\alpha\0v ) e^{i\qv\cdot\rv \nabla \ev_\beta \frac{z_\beta}{|\rv \bv_\beta \rv \right|_{\rv=\bv_\alpha } \end{split}\ static approximation theory reduces to conventional density - functional perturbation theory ( rewrite eq . ( [ force ] ) as eq. ( [ forced ] ) | 0.127974 | 472 | 264 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,878 | we note that the new unitarity regime when scattering amplitude goes beyond the black disc limit ( antishadowing ) could help in the explanation of the regularities such as knee in the energy spectrum , existence of penetrating and long - flying particles and other features observed in the measurements of the extensive air showers which originate from cosmic particles interactions with the atmosphere .
+ the experimental and theoretical studies of cosmic rays are the important source of astrophysical information ( cf . e.g. @xcite ) and they simultaneously provide a window to the future results of accelerator studies of hadron interaction mechanism at the lhc .
[ ts : fig1 ] it can happen that the investigations of cosmic rays will give us a clue that the hadron interaction and mechanism of particle generation is changing in the region of @xmath0 tev@xcite . indeed , the energy spectrum which follows simple power - like law @xmath1 changes its slope in this energy region and becomes steeper : index @xmath2 increases from @xmath3 to @xmath4 .
it is important that the knee in the energy spectrum appears in the same energy region where the penetrating and long flying particles also start to appear in the extensive air showers ( eas ) : the absorbtion length is also changing from @xmath5 @xmath6 to @xmath7 @xmath6 ( cf .
@xcite ) .
there is also specific feature of the events at the energies beyond knee such as alignment cf . @xcite and the references for the earlier papers therein .
the above phenomena were interpreted as a result of appearance of the new particles which have a small inelastic cross
section and/or small inelasticity .
these new particles can be associated with a manifestation of the supersymmetry , quark
gluon plasma formation and other new mechanisms .
however , there is another possibility to treat those cosmic rays phenomena observed in eas as the manifestations of the new unitarity regime ( antishadow scattering mode ) at such energies @xcite .
unitarity of the scattering matrix @xmath8 implies , in principle , an existence at high energies @xmath9 , where @xmath10 is a threshold tev @xcite , which corresponds to the energy in the laboratory system @xmath11 @xmath12 . ] of the new scattering mode antishadow one .
it has been revealed in @xcite and described in some detail ( cf . @xcite and references therein ) and
the most important feature of this mode is the self - damping of the inelastic channels contributions at small values of impact parameter antishadowing .
the antishadowing leads to @xmath13 at @xmath14 , where @xmath15 is a probability of the absence of the inelastic interactions , @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is the elastic scattering @xmath17matrix .
self - damping of the inelastic channels leads to asymptotically dominating role of elastic scattering .
the cross section of inelastic processes rises with energy as @xmath18 , while elastic and total cross sections behave asymptotically as @xmath19 .
the antishadow scattering mode could definitely be observed at the lhc energies and studies of the extensive air showers originated from the cosmic particles interactions with the atmosphere provide evidence for it as we will argue in what follows .
starting at some threshold energy @xmath10 ( where amplitude reaches the black disk limit at @xmath20 ) , antishadowing can occur at higher energies in the limited region of impact parameters @xmath21 ( while at large impact parameters only shadow scattering mode can be realized ) .
the inelastic overlap function @xmath22 becomes peripheral when energy goes beyond @xmath23 ( fig.2 ) . at such energies the inelastic overlap function reaches its maximum value at @xmath24 , where @xmath25 is the interaction radius , while the elastic scattering occurs at smaller values of impact parameter , i.e. @xmath26 .
note that @xmath27 where @xmath28 and @xmath29 and unitarity condition in the impact parameter space is the following @xmath30 where @xmath31 is the elastic scattering amplitude .
the quantity @xmath32 is a measure of the reaction peripherality . despite that the asymptotics for @xmath33 and @xmath34 are different , the quantities @xmath35 and @xmath36 have the same asymptotical energy dependence , proportional to @xmath19 .
so , beyond the transition energy range there are two regions in impact parameter space : the central region where self - damping of inelastic channels occurs ( antishadow scattering at @xmath37 ) and the peripheral region of shadow scattering at @xmath38 . and maximum at @xmath24 with the energy increase .
in the region of @xmath24 the complete absorbtion takes place , i.e. @xmath39.,width=340 ] at the energies @xmath40 small impact parameter scattering is almost elastic one . thus head on colliding particles will provide appearance of penetrating long - flying component in the eas and such particles will spend only small part of their energy for the production of secondaries .
the head - on collisions will lead to smaller number of secondary particle and it will provide faster decrease of the energy spectrum of cosmic rays , i.e. it will result in the appearance of the knee .
this qualitative picture will be explained in more detail in what follows .
it should be noted that this effect has a threshold in the energy dependence .
it is also important to note that due to small probability of the sequential head - on collisions the number of events with penetrating particles also should be small .
nontheless , such events have been observed in the experiments pamir @xcite .
antishadowing leads to suppression of particle production at small impact parameters : @xmath41 i.e. multiplicity distribution @xmath42 and mean multiplicity @xmath43 in the impact parameter representation have no absorptive corrections , but peripherality of @xmath44 leads to suppression of particle production at small impact parameters and the main contribution to the integral multiplicity @xmath45 comes from the region of @xmath46 ( eq . ( [ mm ] ) ) .
this would lead to the events with alignment observed in eas and also to the imbalance between orbital angular momentum in the initial and final states since particles in the final state will carry out large orbital angular momentum . to compensate this orbital momentum spins of secondary particles should become lined up , i.e. the spins of the produced particles should demonstrate significant correlations when the antishadow scattering mode appears @xcite .
thus , the observed phenomena of alignment in eas @xcite and predicted spin correlations of final particles should have a common origin .
the model estimate for the primary energy when these phenomena should appear is @xmath47 @xmath12 @xmath48 is the energy when the new unitarity regime starts to develop at small impact parameters .
the detected particle composition of the eas is closely related to the quantity known as gap survival probability .
antishadowing leads to the nonmonotonous energy dependence of this quantity @xcite .
the gap survival probability , namely the probability to keep away inelastic interactions which can result in filling up by hadrons the large rapidity gaps , reaches its minimal values at the tevatron highest energy and this is due to the fact that the scattering at this energy is very close to the black disk limit at @xmath20 ( fig .
3 ) . [ fig4 ]
it is clear that its higher value means higher fraction for diffractive component and consequently the increasing of this component would result in the enhancement of the relative fraction of protons in the observed cosmic rays spectrum .
otherwise , decreasing of this quantity will lead to increase of pionization component and consequently to the increasing number of muons observed as multi - muon events .
experiment reveals that relative fraction of protons in cosmic rays also shows nonmonotonous energy dependence ( cf .
fig .
4 ) . to explain such dependence an additional component
is introduced _
ad hoc _ at the energies above @xmath49 gev .
it was shown that account of the antishadowing makes an introduction of this _ ad hoc _ component unnecessary .
the inelasticity parameter @xmath50 , which is defined as ratio of the energy going to inelastic processes to the total energy , is important for the interpretation of the eas cascades developments .
its energy dependence is not clear and number of models predict the decreasing energy dependence while other models insist on the increasing energy behaviour at high energies ( cf . e.g. @xcite ) .
adopting simple ansatz of geometrical models
where parameter of inelasticity is related to inelastic overlap function we can use the following equation for @xmath51 @xcite @xmath52 to get a qualitative knowledge on the inelasticity energy dependence .
the estimation of inelasticity based on the particular model with antishadowing @xcite leads to increasing dependence of inelasticity with energy till @xmath53 gev . in this region inelasticity reaches maximum value @xmath54 , since @xmath55 and then starts to decrease at the energies where this ratio goes beyond the black disk limit @xmath56
. such qualitative nonmonotonous energy dependence of inelasticity is the result of transition to the antishadowing scattering regime .
the distribution on the inelasticity is related to the distribution on the effective mass number , i.e. changes of @xmath57 are equivalent to changes of @xmath51 , and , for example , high - inelasticity primary proton interaction produces the same result at the ground level as the low - inelasticity primary interaction of the heavy nuclei @xcite .
the available experimental data on the average logarithm of the effective nuclear mass number , extracted from the energy dependence of the depth of eas maximum , have large error bars , but they also indicate a nonmonotonous energy dependence with the maximum in the region @xmath58 gev @xcite .
it is also worth to note that the maximum in inelasticity energy dependence , when the pionization component is maximal , is correlated with the minimum of the relative component of protons in the eas , the following simple relation can be supposed @xmath59 i.e. the relative proton component in the detected eas should have a non - monotonic energy dependence and this is in agreement with the experimental analysis represented in fig . 4 . [ pfrac ] it should be noted that the behaviour of the ratio @xmath60 when it goes to unity at @xmath14 does not imply decreasing energy dependence of @xmath34 .
the inelastic cross
section @xmath34 increases monotonically and it grows as @xmath18 at @xmath14 .
such a dependence of @xmath34 is in good agreement with the experimental data and , in particular , with the observed falling slope of the depth of shower maximum distribution @xcite .
the predicted numerical value of the inelastic cross - section is @xmath61 @xmath62 at the lhc energy @xmath63 @xmath64 .
this value is also in a good agreement with the value for this quantity extracted from the proton - air inelastic cross - section @xcite .
this approach provides a reasonable description @xcite of the energy dependence of mean multiplicity and leads to its power - like growth with a small exponent .
the relation of the knee and other effects observed in the eas measurements with the modification of particle generation mechanism is under discussion since the time when they were discovered .
we propose here one particular realization of this idea an approach where the corresponding particle generation mechanism in eas is strongly affected by the unitarity effects and the energy region between the knee and the ankle coincides with the transition region to the scattering mode where antishadowing develops at small and then at moderate values of impact parameter , i.e. the energy spectrum of the primary cosmic particles @xmath65 is modulated by the significant variation of the scattering matrix @xmath17 in the energy region starting from about @xmath66 gev and finishing at about @xmath67 gev and this resulting in the regularities in the observed spectrum @xmath68 measured in the eas studies . below the energy @xmath69 and beyond the energy @xmath70 variation of scattering matrix is slow and the primary energy spectrum @xmath71 is almost not affected .
it seems to be a rather natural explanation of the observed regularities in the eas measurements and has a close interrelation with the nonmonotonous energy dependence of gap survival probability and inelasticity .
this hypothesis is based on the saturation of the unitarity and can be experimentally checked at the lhc @xcite .
the studies of the proton scattering in the forward region at the lhc will be very helpful for improving the interpretation of the results of the cosmic rays experiments . | we are grateful to v.a .
petrov for the interesting discussions on the impact parameter dependence of the mean multiplicity .
99 a. de rjula , nucl .
151 , 23 , 2006 , [ hep - ph/0412094 , astro - ph/0411763 ] .
r. engel , t.k .
gaisser , p. lipari , t. stanev , phys . rev .
d 58 , 014019 , 1998 ; + r. engel , astro - ph/0504358 .
t. stanev , astro - ph/0411113 ; + s.i .
nikolsky , v.g .
sinitsina , phys . atom .
67 , 1900 , 2004 , ; + a.a .
petrukhin , proc . of the 28th international cosmic ray conferences
icrc 2003 , tsukuba , japan , 31 jul - 7 aug 2003 , 275 .
hrandel , talk at 19th european cosmic ray symposium , florence , italy , 30 aug - 3 sep 2004 ; astro - ph/0501251 .
t. antoni et al . , phys . rev .
d 71 , 072002 , 2005 .
s. m. troshin , n. e. tyurin , phys . lett .
b 316 , 175 , 1993 . j.r .
hrandel , j. phys .
g 29 , 2439 , 2003 .
troshin , n.e .
tyurin , phys .
35 , 555 , 2004 .
troshin , n.e .
tyurin , eur .
j. c 21 , 679 , 2001 ; + v.a .
petrov , a.v .
prokudin , s.m .
troshin , n.e .
tyurin , j. phys .
g 27 , 2225 , 2001 .
t. arisawa , et al .
b 424 , 241 , 1994 . s.m .
troshin , phys .
b 597 , 391 , 2004 .
troshin , n.e .
tyurin , eur .
j. c 39 , 435 , 2005 .
shabelski , r.m .
weiner , g. wilk , z. wlodarczyk , j. phys .
g 18 , 1281 , 1992 .
j. dias de deus , phys . rev .
d 32 , 2334 , 1985 ; + s. barshay , y. ciba , phys . lett .
b 167 , 449 , 1985 . l.w .
jones , nucl .
b75a , 54 , 1999 .
gaisser et al . , phys . rev .
d 36 , 1350 , 1993 .
troshin , n.e .
tyurin , j. phys .
g 29 , 1061 , 2003 . | grateful petrov discussions impact parameter dependence mean multiplicity rjula nucl. 151 , 23 2006 hep - ph/0412094 astro - ph/0411763 engel gaisser lipari stanev . rev 58 , 014019 1998 engel astro - ph/0504358 stanev astro - ph/0411113 nikolsky sinitsina atom 67 , 1900 2004 petrukhin 28th international cosmic ray conferences 2003 tsukuba japan 31 jul - 7 aug 2003 hrandel 19th european cosmic ray symposium florence italy 30 aug 3 sep 2004 astro - ph/0501251 antoni phys . rev d 71 , 072002 2005 troshin tyurin phys 316 , 175 1993 hrandel phys 29 , 2439 2003 troshin tyurin phys 35 , 555 2004 21 , 679 2001 petrov prokudin troshin tyurin 27 , 2225 2001 arisawa 424 , 241 1994troshin phys 597 , 391 2004 tyurin c 39 , 435 2005 shabelski weiner wilk wlodarczyk 18 , 1281 1992 dias deus phys d 32 , 2334 1985 barshay ciba b 167 , 449 1985 jones nucl b75a 54 1999 gaisser d 36 , 1350 1993 troshin tyurin phys g 29 , 1061 2003 | 0.129635 | 697 | 379 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,879 | the dynamics of the inner disk of many galaxies is dominated by bars . as a result
, resonances between the bar and the disk become an important factor . in order to detect resonances , we measure angular and radial frequencies of individual orbits in n - body models of barred galaxies . in our simulations with several million particles , stellar disks are immersed in live halos of dark matter . a bar forms spontaneously and interacts with the disk through resonances .
we detect 9 of them .
the corotation ( cr ) and the inner lindblad resonance ( ilr ) are the most significant .
the spatial distributions of particles trapped at these resonances show that ilr is not localized at a given radius .
particles trapped at ilr lie along the bar spanning a wide range of radii . on the other hand , particles at the corotation resonance form a ring around the corotation radius .
we study how orbits evolve near corotation and how they are trapped .
when an orbit is getting trapped , it evolves strongly , but after that there is little evolution .
those trapped orbits circulate along the corotation ring or librate around a stable lagragian point .
the same technique is applied to study resonances in the halo .
the bar interacts strongly with the halo particles that stay close to the disk .
we find the corotation resonance and the inner lindblad resonance for halo particles .
this paper contains the figures presented in the conference : " dynamics of galaxies : baryons and dark matter ( las vegas , nv , march 2005 ) . the full talk is available in http://astronomy.nmsu.edu/dept/html/directory.grads.danielcv.shtml | we have detected resonances in n - body simulations with evolving disks in live halos using only trajectories of the particles .
we find that all resonances are trapping .
no gaps or scattering resonances are found . in our models , there are little evolution after particles get trapped .
the corotation resonance captures particles in a ring outside the bar .
another important result is that the inner lindblad resonance is not localized at a given radius .
we have also detected trapping resonances in the halo . | detected resonances n - body simulations live halos trajectories particles all resonances trapping no gaps scattering resonances little evolution after particles trapped corotation resonance captures particles outside bar inner lindblad resonance not localized radius detected trapping resonances in halo | 0.066327 | 104 | 49 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,881 | in the light of recent observations which point to an open universe @xmath0 , we construct an open singularity - free cosmological model by reconsidering a model originally constructed for a closed universe .
our model starts from a nonsingular state called prematter , governed by an inflationary equation of state @xmath1 where @xmath2 @xmath3 is a small positive parameter representing the initial vacuum dominance of the universe . unlike the closed models universe
can not be initially static hence , starts with an initial expansion rate represented by the initial value of the hubble constant h(0 ) .
therefore , our model is a two - parameter universe model @xmath4 . comparing the predictions of this model for the present properties of the universe with the recent observational results
, we argue that the model constructed in this work could be used as a realistic universe model .
we started the evolution of a flat universe from a nonsingular state called prematter which is governed by an inflationary equation of state @xmath1 where @xmath2 represents the initial vacuum dominance of the universe .
the evolution of the universe - except in the prematter era - is affected neither by the initial vacuum dominance nor the initial expansion rate of the universe . on the other hand , present properties of the universe such as hubble constant ,
age and density are sensitive to the temperature at the decoupling over a range between value between 50 and 80 @xmath5 for the present value of the hubble constant @xmath6 . assuming that the thermal history of the universe is independent from its geometry , the above range could be considered as transition range for the decoupling temperature | although the standard cosmological model has been succesful in explaining the homogenous expansion of the universe and the 2.7 k cosmic microwave background radiation , it has some shortcomings like the initial singularity , horizon ( or causality ) , flatness , homogeneity and isotropy problems.@xcite among these problems the initial singularity problem may be the one which weakens the model much more than the others , in the sense that it causes infinities in the physical quantities such as the density , pressure and temperature . since these infinities can not be accepted by any model which claims to be physical , during the past two decades , several authors have considered the possibility of describing the universe with a singularity - free cosmological model . @xcite recent observations point out that the universe has an @xmath7 , @xmath8 value lower than unity which means that the universe is spatially open .
@xcite in the light of these , we propose an open singularity - free cosmological model with the same motivations as in ref .
however , initially static condition @xmath9 used by the closed universe models can no longer be used in the open universe case since it leads to negative energy densities . for this reason in our model universe
starts expanding with an initial velocity .
hence , we have a two - parameter universe model in which one of the parameters characterizes the equation of state used to describe the prematter era , and the other one corresponds to the initial expansion rate of the universe .
our model describes an open , spatially homogenous and isotropic universe with a space - time geometry given by the robertson - walker ( rw ) line element : @xmath10 , \ ] ] where @xmath11 are the comoving coordinates , @xmath12 is the scale factor which represents the size of the universe . for the rw metric , einstein field equations lead us to the following differential equations : @xmath13 @xmath14 where @xmath15 and @xmath16 are the energy density and pressure in the universe respectively , where we have used perfect fluid energy momentum tensor in comoving coordinates .
here a dot denotes differentiation with respect to the cosmic time @xmath17 and we use the units so that @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the planck mass . combining eqs .
( 2 ) and ( 3 ) and using an equation of state given as @xmath20 one obtains the following relation : @xmath21 where , @xmath22 is assumed to be a constant parameter during each era in the history of the universe .
we can eliminate @xmath15 between eqs .
( 2 ) and ( 5 ) and obtain an equation involving only the scale factor @xmath12 : @xmath23 to solve this equation for any @xmath22 , it is advantageous to work in conformal time @xmath24 which is defined as @xmath25 using this transformation , eq .
( 6 ) is solved to give two linearly independent solutions given as @xmath26 ^{1/c},\ ] ] @xmath27 ^{1/c},\ ] ] where @xmath28 and @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the integration constants .
these solutions correspond to different signs of the energy density @xmath31 . assuming that the universe is filled with positive energy , we eliminate eq .
( 9 ) and consider only eq .
( 8) as the solution for the scale factor of the universe . in this work , we model the universe as a series of perfect fluid eras connected by first order phase transitions .
according to the considerations of this scenario , the universe starts expanding with a period of rapid expansion called inflationary era .
this period is characterized by an equation of state in the form @xmath32 and inflation arises due to this vacuum - like characteristic of the equation of state .
since matter would be under extreme conditions during this period and behaves very differently from the ordinary matter , it is called `` prematter '' .
@xcite during this period due to the unusual characteristic of the equation of state , temperature increases although the universe expands enormously .
we assume that inflation continues until the temperature reaches the maximum allowed temperature i.e. the planck temperature @xmath33 @xmath34 .
this behavior , which does not necessitate a `` re - heating mechanism '' as in the other models of the universe , follows from the vacuum like characteristic of the equation of state used to describe the universe in this era .
initially , we assume that the universe is in a vacuum - like state and has a limiting density called the planck density @xmath35 which is first formulated by markov as a universal law of nature .
@xcite since our model describes a universe starting from a finite size and density , the initial expansion rate must be taken as positive .
hence we take the initial expansion rate as @xmath36 where @xmath37 is some positive constant .
solutions for the scale factor in different eras are:@xmath38^{1/c_{p}}\ & \ \ 0\leq
\eta \leq \eta _ { r } , \\ a_{0}^{(r)}[\sinh ( \eta + \delta _ { r } ) ] & \eta
_ { r}\leq \eta \leq \eta _ { m } , \\ a_{0}^{(m)}[\sinh ( \eta /2+\delta _ { m})]^{2}\ & \ \eta _ { m}\leq \eta . \end{array } \right.\ ] ] where _ p _ , _ r _ , and _
m _ denote the prematter , radiation and matter eras respectively .
we next impose the boundary condition that the scale factor and its derivative are continuous at points @xmath39 and @xmath40 where the phase transitions take place .
this determines the integration constants as , @xmath41 ^{\frac{1}{c_{p}}+1}d^{-1/2},\ ] ] @xmath42 @xmath43^{\frac{1}{c_{p}}% -1},\ ] ] @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 as seen from the solutions for the scale factor , the model that we propose is a two - parameter model .
the parameters are the @xmath47 value and the initial value of the hubble constant @xmath48 .
the former determines the amount of inflation that the universe has experienced during the prematter era and the latter is related to the initial expansion rate of the universe
. we can find the comoving times corresponding to the conformal times @xmath49 @xmath40 and @xmath50 by using the definition given in eq .
assuming that @xmath51 at @xmath52 we get from eq .
( 8) @xmath53 ^{1/c}d\eta ^{\prime } .\ ] ] this integral depends on the values of @xmath54 and has to be computed numerically in the prematter era .
whereas , for the radiation @xmath55 and matter @xmath56 eras , eq .
( 18 ) could be integrated to yield analytical expressions .
the expressions for the comoving times corresponding to @xmath57 @xmath58 and @xmath50 are @xmath59^{1/c_{p}}d\eta , \ ] ] @xmath60 , \ ] ] @xmath61 .\ ] ] hubble constants at @xmath62 and @xmath50 could now be obtained by using @xmath63 as @xmath64^{\frac{1}{c_{p}}+1}}~km\cdot s^{-1}\cdot mpc^{-1},\ ] ] @xmath65 @xmath66 the evolution of the energy density is described by @xmath67 eq .
( 26 ) could then be solved to yield @xmath68 where @xmath69 and @xmath70 are the initial and final instants of any conformal time interval in a given era .
choosing @xmath71 we obtain respectively @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74
in order to see this dependence and the development of the universe in this model , we changed one of the parameters while fixing the other and provided some numerical results .
this allowed us to identify the character of the dependency of the model to each parameter .
first , we fix @xmath75 to @xmath76 @xmath77 , and changed @xmath2 in such a way that it took values between @xmath78 and @xmath79 it is to be noted that in this broad range , the value of hubble constant has a wide spectrum between @xmath80 @xmath77 and @xmath81 @xmath82 next , we set @xmath2 to @xmath83 and varied @xmath75 in the range between @xmath84 @xmath77 and @xmath85 @xmath77 .
the corresponding values for the hubble constant vary between @xmath86 @xmath77 and @xmath87 @xmath82
we construct an open singularity - free cosmological model with the assumptions that the universe is initially in a vacuum like state and the physical quantities are limited by their planck values .
evolution of the temperature of the universe is governed by its expansion . during the prematter era ,
temperature increases due to inflation and the universe is characterized by a vacuum like equation of state in the form @xmath88 where @xmath89 is a parameter which determines the vacuum dominance of the early universe .
hence , the model we construct is a two - parameter universe model , the parameters being @xmath75 and @xmath90 .
this era ends when the temperature reaches the maximum allowed temperature @xmath91 then the universe enters the radiation era and starts cooling down .
this cooling continues during the matter era described by the standard model .
the so - called flatness problem is not present in this model since the initial value of @xmath92 is not set to unity . in the standard model ,
such a precise initial condition has to be assumed without explanation to produce a universe resembling the actual one . in this model ,
the universe starts its journey with an @xmath92 value no matter how close to unity and during the prematter era @xmath92 is driven toward unity . at the end of this era ,
the universe is nearly flat since its @xmath92 value is very close to one .
this fact could be attributed to the inflation mechanism which causes the universe to expand enormously in a very small time interval ( planck time ) and thus become flatter than at the beginning . during the radiation and matter eras , @xmath92 is driven away unity which apparently displays the open character of the space - time geometry of the model . in this work ,
we have not been interested in the microphysics of the inflationary era .
this includes quantum mechanical investigation of the material content of the early universe and the form of the scalar field potential responsible for the inflation .
however , with this simple form , the scenario proposed in this work might provide a guidance for the future more complete versions of the open inflation . | standard cosmological model succesful explaining homogenous expansion universe 2.7 k cosmic microwave background radiation has shortcomings like initial singularity horizon causality flatness homogeneity isotropy problems initial singularity problem weakens model causes infinities in physical quantities density pressure temperature infinities accepted by model authors considered describing universe with singularity - free cosmological model recent observations universe has @xmath7 , @xmath8 value lower than unity spatially open propose open singularity - free cosmological model same motivations initially static condition @xmath9 by closed universe models used in open universe leads to negative energy densities our model universe starts expanding with initial velocity two - parameter universe model one characterizes equation of state other initial expansion rate model describes open spatially homogenous isotropic universe with space - time geometry given by robertson - walker ) line element : @xmath10 @xmath11 are comoving coordinates @xmath12 scale factor size universerw metric einstein field equations differential equations @xmath13 @xmath14 energy density pressure universe used perfect fluid energy momentum tensor coordinates dot denotes differentiation cosmic time @xmath17 units @xmath18 @xmath19 planck mass combining eqs ( 2 ) 3 ) equation of state @xmath20 obtains relation : @xmath21 @xmath22 constant parameter each era universe eliminate @xmath15 between eqs 2 5 ) obtain equation scale factor @xmath12 @xmath23 solve equation work in conformal time @xmath24 defined @xmath25 transformation eq . ( 6 ) two linearly independent solutions @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 integration constants solutions correspond energy density @xmath31 universe filled positive energy eliminate eq . ( 9 ) consider eq . ( 8) solution scale factor universe model universe perfect fluid eras connected first order phase transitions universe starts expanding rapid expansion inflationary era characterized equation of state @xmath32 inflation arises due vacuum - like characteristic equation statematter under extreme conditions behaves differently called `` prematter '' period due to unusual characteristic equation of state temperature increases universe expands enormously inflation continues until temperature reaches maximum temperature planck temperature @xmath33 @xmath34 behavior not necessitate re - heating mechanism '' other follows from vacuum like characteristic of equation of state universe in vacuum - like state limiting density planck density @xmath35 formulated by markov as universal law of nature model describes universe from finite size density initial expansion rate positive initial expansion rate as @xmath36 @xmath37 positive constant solutions for scale factor in different eras are:@xmath38^{1/c_{p}}\ 0\leq \eta _ { r }_{0}^{(r)}\eta + \delta _ r }{(m}+\delta _}\eta _ { m}\leq\eta _ p _ _ r _ m _ denote prematter radiation matter erasimpose boundary condition scale factor derivative continuous at @xmath39 @xmath40 phase transitions determines integration constants @xmath41-1/2} @xmath42 @xmath43 -1 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 solutions scale factor model two - parameter model parameters @xmath47 value initial value hubble constant @xmath48 former determines inflation prematter era latter initial expansion rate find comoving times conformal times @xmath49 @xmath40 @xmath50 definition eq . @xmath51 @xmath52 from eq . @xmath53 ^{1/c}d\eta } integral depends on values @xmath54 computed numerically prematter era radiation @xmath55 matter @xmath56 eras eq . 18 integrated analytical expressions expressions comoving times @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath50 are @xmath59^{1/c_{p}}d\eta @xmath60 @xmath61 .hubble constants @xmath62 @xmath50 obtained using @xmath63 as @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 evolution energy density described by @xmath67 solved @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 initial final instants of conformal time interval choosing @xmath71 obtain @xmath72 @xmath74 development changed other provided numerical results identify dependency model each parameter fix @xmath75 to @xmath76 changed @xmath2 took values between @xmath78 and @xmath79 value hubble constant spectrum between @xmath80 @xmath77 @xmath81 @xmath82 set @xmath2 to @xmath83 varied @xmath75 between @xmath84 @xmath77 @xmath85 values hubble constant vary between @xmath86 @xmath77 @xmath87 @xmath82 open singularity - free cosmological model universe initially in vacuum state physical quantities limited by planck values evolution temperature governed by expansion prematter era temperature increases due to inflation universe characterized by vacuum like equation state @xmath88 @xmath89 determines vacuum dominance early universemodel is two - parameter universe model parameters @xmath75 and @xmath90 era ends temperature maximum temperature @xmath91 universe enters radiation era starts cooling cooling continues during matter era standard model flatness problem not present initial value @xmath92 not set to unity standard model precise initial condition assumed universe universe starts journey with @xmath92 value close to unity prematter era @xmath92 driven toward unity end era universe nearly flat @xmath92 value close to one attributed to inflation mechanism universe expand in small time interval planck time flatter during radiation matter eras @xmath92 driven away unity displays open character space - time geometry not interested in microphysics of inflationary era includes quantum mechanical investigation of material content early universe form scalar field potential responsible for inflation scenario proposed might provide guidance for future versions open inflation | 0.354294 | 2,386 | 1,211 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,891 | near - infrared surveys provide one of the best opportunities to investigate the cosmic evolution of galaxies and their mass assembly .
we briefly review the main results obtained so far with the k20 and other recent near - ir surveys on the redshift distribution , the evolution of the luminosity function and luminosity density , the nature of old and dusty eros , the evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function , the properties of the galaxies in the `` redshift desert '' and the nature of luminous starbursts at @xmath0 . | despite the detection of objects up to @xmath1 and the impressive success of the @xmath2cdm scenario to account for the properties of the cosmic microwave background , one of the main and still controversial questions remains how and when galaxies assembled their mass as a function of the cosmic time .
the hierarchical scenario predicts that galaxies built up their present - day mass through a progressive assembly of smaller sub - systems driven by the merging of dark matter halos . with ground - based observations , one of the most solid approaches to address the problems of galaxy formation and evolution is to study samples of field faint galaxies selected in the near - infrared , particularly in the @xmath3-band ( 2.2@xmath4 m ) @xcite .
firstly , since the rest - frame near - ir luminosity is a good tracer of the galaxy stellar mass @xcite , @xmath3-band surveys allow to select galaxies according to their mass up to @xmath5 ( @xmath6 m ) . at higher redshifts ,
the @xmath3-band starts to sample the rest - frame optical and uv regions , and space - based observations at @xmath7 m are needed to cover the rest - frame near - infrared ( e.g. sirtf , astro - f ) .
secondly , the similarity of the spectral shapes of different galaxy types in the rest - frame near - ir makes the @xmath3-band selection free from strong biases against or in favor of particular classes of galaxies .
in contrast , the selection of high-@xmath8 galaxies in the observed optical bands is more sensitive to the star formation activity than to the stellar mass because it samples the rest - frame uv light and makes optical samples biased against old passive or weakly star - forming galaxies .
last but not least , near - infrared surveys are less affected by dust extinction than optical surveys . motivated by the above considerations ,
several near - infrared surveys have been undertaken during the last decade @xcite ( fig .
1 ) . spectroscopic surveys are particularly relevant thanks to their capability not only to derive the redshifts , but also to unveil the nature and the spectral properties of the targeted galaxies .
since near - ir multi - object spectrographs are not fully available on 8 - 10m - class telescopes , most spectroscopy of @xmath3-selected galaxies has been done in the optical .
the most crucial probes of massive galaxy evolution are galaxies with the very red colors expected in case of passive evolution at @xmath9 ( e.g. @xmath10 , usually called extremely red objects , eros ) . however , for the typical limiting fluxes of near - ir surveys ( @xmath11 ) , they have very faint optical magnitudes ( @xmath12 ) already close to the spectroscopic limits of 8 - 10m - class telescopes . in addition , for @xmath9 their main spectral features ( e.g. the 4000 break and h&k absorptions ) fall in the very red part of the observed spectra , where the strong oh sky lines and the ccd fringing and low quantum efficiency make spectroscopy even more demanding .
the k20 survey is a project aimed at investigating galaxy evolution through deep eso vlt spectroscopy of a sample of 546 objects with @xmath13 selected from two fields covering a total area of 52 arcmin@xmath14 .
the two fields are completely independent , and one of them is a sub - area of the chandra deep field south .
most spectroscopy was done in the optical with fors1 and fors2 and designed to reach the highest possible signal - to - noise ratio in the red .
isaac near - ir spectroscopy was also done for a small fraction of the sample . the multi - band ( @xmath15 ) imaging available for both fields
was used to derive high - quality photometric redshifts `` trained '' with the spectroscopic redshifts .
the final sample covers a redshift range of @xmath16 , and the current redshift completeness is 92% ( spectroscopic ) and 100% ( spectroscopic + photometric redshifts ) .
the k20 survey represents a significant improvement with respect to other surveys for faint @xmath3-selected galaxies thanks to its high spectroscopic redshift completeness ( the highest to date ) extended to very faint red objects , the larger sample , the coverage of two fields and the availability of optimized photometric redshifts .
we note here that the distribution of the sample over two independent sky fields is a significant advantage in reducing the field - to - field variation effects . for more details on the k20 survey see @xcite and _
overall , the k20 and other recent near - ir surveys show that galaxies are characterized by little evolution to @xmath18 , so that the observed properties can be mimicked by a pure luminosity evolution ( ple)-like scenario .
this is in contrast with the current @xmath2cdm hierarchical merging models where the assembly of galaxies occurs later than what is actually observed . in particular : @xmath19 for @xmath13 , @xmath20 has a median redshift of @xmath21 and a high-@xmath8 tail extended beyond @xmath0 .
current hierarchical models do not match the observed redshift distribution @xcite ( fig.2 ) , but an improved treatment of the merging processes is providing encouraging results @xcite . compared with the predictions of three hierarchical merging model ( dotted and dashed lines ) and a pure luminosity evolution ( ple ) model ( solid line ) .
the models refer to _ total _ magnitudes @xmath13 and are not corrected for the average under - estimate of 0.2 magnitudes due to the photometric selection effects evaluated in the k20 sample ( see @xcite ) . including this bias in the models results in improving the agreement with the ple models and increasing the discrepancy with the hierarchical models , as shown in the inserted plot where the model of menci et al .
( 2002 ) for @xmath22 is compared to the observed @xmath9 tail of @xmath20 ( see @xcite ) .
, scaledwidth=95.0% ] @xmath19 the rest - frame @xmath23-band luminosity function shows a mild luminosity evolution up to @xmath24 , with a brightening of about 0.5 magnitudes .
significant density evolution is ruled out up to @xmath24 @xcite .
the high - luminosity tail at @xmath18 is dominated by red early - type galaxies @xcite .
current hierarchical models fail in reproducing the shape and the evolution of the lf as they over - predict the number of sub-@xmath25 galaxies , under - predict that of luminous galaxies , and predict a strong density evolution .
@xmath19 the rest - frame @xmath23-band luminosity density evolves slowly to @xmath18 with @xmath26 , and much slower than the uv luminosity density @xcite .
@xmath19 the properties of `` old '' eros with @xmath13 at @xmath18 ( morphology , spectra , luminosities , ages , stellar masses , clustering ) imply the existence of a substantial population of old ( a few gyr ) , passively evolving and fully assembled massive spheroids which requires that major episodes of massive galaxy formation occurred at least at @xmath27 @xcite .
their number density at @xmath18 is consistent ( within @xmath28 ) with that of local luminous e / s0 galaxies .
current hierarchical models severely under - predict the number of `` old '' eros @xcite .
@xmath19 a numerous population of dusty star - forming eros with disk - like and irregular morphologies emerges at @xmath29 from near - ir surveys @xcite .
these objects are often too faint to be detected in submm surveys due to their inferred far - ir luminosities @xmath30 l@xmath31 and represent an ensemble of galaxies important to complement other star - forming systems selected with different techiniques .
they are also expected to be important contributors to the cosmic star - formation density @xcite . also
in this case , current hierarchical models under - estimate the number of `` dusty '' eros .
@xmath19 `` old '' eros seem to have much stronger clustering than `` dusty '' eros , with a comoving @xmath32 similar to that of present - day luminous ellipticals @xcite .
@xmath19 the number density of massive galaxies and the cosmic stellar mass density @xmath33 show a slow decrease from @xmath34 to @xmath18 qualitatively consistent with a hierarchical scenario , but much slower than what the current models predict @xcite .
at higher redshifts , the picture becomes more controversial : at @xmath9 the evolution of the near - ir luminosity function seems to depart from a ple - like pattern @xcite , it is still not clear if the number density of old spheroids drops at @xmath35 @xcite , and unexpected populations of massive star - forming galaxies are being found in the range of @xmath36 thanks to near - ir surveys @xcite .
moreover , the galaxy stellar mass function and @xmath37 display a fast evolution at @xmath9 @xcite , and the k20 survey results suggest a rapid increase of the stellar mass density from @xmath38% of the local value at @xmath39 to about 100% at @xmath40 @xcite .
these results suggest that @xmath41 may be the critical cosmic epoch during which most star formation activity and galaxy mass assembly took place .
however , probing the @xmath41 range is difficult due to the lack of strong spectral features and emission lines redshifted in the observed optical and to the strong oh emission sky lines severely affecting the spectra beyond @xmath178000 . due to the limited number of spectroscopically identified galaxies , this redshift range has been traditionally called `` redshift desert '' .
thanks to the very deep red - optimized optical spectroscopy and to near - ir spectroscopy , the k20 survey allowed us to populate the `` redshift desert '' and to unveil the nature of @xmath3-selected galaxies in this critical redshift range . by combining deep hst+acs imaging with k20 spectroscopy , we found that a variety of galaxy types are present at @xmath41 : spheroids at @xmath5 , disk- and spiral - like systems , and many irregular merging - like objects . particularly relevant
is a sub - sample of luminous galaxies at @xmath42 spectroscopically identified in the k20 survey @xcite .
their inferred star formation rates of @xmath43 m@xmath31yr@xmath44 , stellar masses up to @xmath45 m@xmath31 derived from the fitting of their multi - color spectral energy distributions , and their merging - like optical morphologies becoming more compact in the near - ir , suggest that these galaxies may be massive galaxies caught during their major episode of mass assembly and star - formation , possibly being the progenitors of the present - day massive spheroidal systems .
current semi - analytical models under - predict by a factor of @xmath46 the number density of such galaxies @xcite .
other near - ir surveys are independently finding candidate massive systems at @xmath47 @xcite . in order to draw a coherent picture of galaxy evolution at @xmath41
, it will be crucial to combine @xmath3-selected samples ( e.g. k20 , fires @xcite , gdds @xcite ) with uv- and optically - selected samples more biased toward star - forming objects with little dust extinction such as those resulting from the lyman - break selection at @xmath48 @xcite .
the k20 survey team includes : t. broadhurst ( huj ) , s. cristiani ( inaf - trieste ) , s. dodorico ( eso ) , e. daddi ( eso ) , a. fontana ( inaf - roma ) , e. giallongo ( inaf - roma ) , r. gilmozzi ( eso ) , n. menci ( inaf - roma ) , m. mignoli ( inaf - bologna ) , f. poli ( university of rome ) , l. pozzetti ( inaf - bologna ) , a. renzini ( eso ) , p. saracco ( inaf - brera ) , and g. zamorani ( inaf - bologna ) . | detection of objects up to @xmath1 success @xmath2cdm scenario cosmic microwave background controversial how galaxies assembled mass cosmic time hierarchical scenario predicts galaxies built mass through progressive assembly smaller sub - systems merging dark matter halos galaxy formation evolution study samples field faint galaxies in near - infrared particularly @xmath3-band ( 2.2@xmath4 m ) rest - frame near - ir luminosity good tracer of galaxy stellar mass @xmath3-band surveys select galaxies according to mass up to @xmath5 ( m ) at higher redshifts rest - frame optical uv regions observations at @xmath7 m needed cover rest - frame near - infrared similarity of spectral shapes of galaxy types makes @xmath3-band selection free from biases selection of high-@xmath8 galaxies more sensitive to star formation activity stellar mass uv light biased against old star - forming galaxies near - infrared surveys less affected by dust extinction optical several near - infrared surveys undertaken during last decade @xcite ( fig . 1 )spectroscopic surveys relevant redshifts spectral properties targeted galaxies near - ir multi - object spectrographs available on 8 - 10m telescopes spectroscopy @xmath3-selected galaxies optical crucial galaxies red colors passive evolution at @xmath9 red limiting fluxes near - ir surveys @xmath11 faint optical magnitudes ( @xmath12 ) close to spectroscopic limits 8 - 10m - telescopes @xmath9 main spectral features 4000 break h&k absorptions in red part spectra strong oh sky lines ccd fringing low quantum efficiency spectroscopy demanding k20 survey galaxy evolution deep eso vlt spectroscopy 546 objects with @xmath13 selected from two fields 52 arcmin@xmath14 fields independent one sub - area chandra deep field south spectroscopy in optical with fors1 fors2 highest signal - to - noise ratio red isaac near - ir spectroscopy for small fraction sample multi - band ( @xmath15 ) imaging high - quality photometric redshiftsfinal sample covers redshift range @xmath16 current redshift completeness 92% spectroscopic 100% spectroscopic + photometric redshifts k20 survey improvement faint @xmath3-selected galaxies high spectroscopic redshift completeness highest faint red objects larger sample coverage two fields optimized photometric redshifts distribution sample over two sky fields field - to - field variation details k20 survey see @xcite surveys show galaxies little evolution to @xmath18 observed properties mimicked by pure luminosity evolution-like scenario contrast with current @xmath2cdm hierarchical merging models assembly occurs later than @xmath19 @xmath13 @xmath20 median redshift of @xmath21 high-@xmath8 tail extended beyond @xmath0 current hierarchical models match observed redshift distribution @xcite improved treatment merging processes encouraging results predictions hierarchical merging luminosity model models refer to total magnitudes @xmath13 not corrected for average under - estimate 0.2 magnitudes due to photometric selection effects k20 samplebias in models agreement with ple models discrepancy with hierarchical models plot model menci et al 2002 @xmath22 compared to @xmath9 tail @xmath20 scaledwidth=95.0% @xmath23-band luminosity mild luminosity evolution up to @xmath24 brightening 0.5 magnitudes significant density evolution ruled out up to @xmath24 high - luminosity tail at @xmath18 dominated by red early - type galaxies models shape evolution lf over - predict sub-@xmath25 galaxies under - predict luminous galaxies strong density evolution-band luminosity density evolves slowly to @xmath18 with @xmath26 slower than uv luminosity density @xcite properties of old eros with @xmath13 @xmath18 imply substantial population old massive spheroids major massive galaxy formation at @xmath27 @xcite density at @xmath18 consistent with local luminous e / s0 galaxies models under - predict number old eros @xcite population of dusty star - forming eros with irregular morphologies emerges at @xmath29objects faint in submm surveys due to inferred far - ir luminosities @xmath30 represent galaxies star - forming systems important contributors to cosmic star - formation density models under - estimate dusty eros @xmath19 old eros stronger clustering @xmath32 similar luminous ellipticals number density of massive galaxies cosmic stellar mass density slow decrease from @xmath34 to @xmath18 slower than current models higher redshifts picture controversial @xmath9 near - ir luminosity function from pattern clear if number density of old spheroids drops at @xmath35 unexpected populations of massive star - forming galaxies found in range @xmath36 near - ir surveys galaxy stellar mass function @xmath37 fast evolution at @xmath9 k20 survey results suggest rapid increase stellar mass density from to 100% at @xmath40 @xmath41 critical cosmic epoch most star formation activity galaxy mass assembly probing @xmath41 range difficult due to lack strong spectral features emission lines redshifted strong emission sky lines affecting spectra beyond @xmath178000limited spectroscopically identified galaxies redshift range called redshift desert deep red - optimized optical spectroscopy near - ir spectroscopy k20 survey desert @xmath3-selected galaxies deep hst+acs imaging k20 spectroscopy variety galaxy types at @xmath41 spheroids disk- spiral - like systems irregular merging - like objects relevant sub - sample luminous galaxies at @xmath42 identified k20 survey inferred star formation rates of @xmath43@xmath44 stellar masses to @xmath45@xmath31 multi - color spectral energy distributions merging - like optical morphologies compact suggest massive during major mass assembly star - formation possibly progenitors of massive spheroidal systems models under - predict @xmath46 number density galaxies near - ir surveys candidate massive systems at @xmath47 @xcite galaxy evolution at @xmath41 combine @xmath3-selected samples with uv- optically - selected samples toward star - forming objects little dust extinction lyman - break selection @xmath48 k20 survey team includes t. broadhurst s.cristiani - trieste dodorico eso e. daddi eso fontana - roma giallongo roma r. eso n. menci roma m. mignoli bologna f. poli ( university of rome l. pozzetti - bologna renzini eso p. saracco - brera g. zamorani - bologna ) | 0.433894 | 2,648 | 1,345 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,896 | the cp violating processes @xmath0 and @xmath1 are searched for using samples of 58 million @xmath2 and 14 million @xmath3 events collected with the beijing spectrometer at the beijing electron positron collider .
no signal is observed , and upper limits on the decay branching ratios are determined to be @xmath4 and @xmath5 at the 95% confidence level . | the decay of @xmath6 charmonium states , like @xmath2 and @xmath3 , to @xmath7 is a cp violating process . however , since cp violations in both the @xmath8 and @xmath9 systems have been well established @xcite , it is of interest to search for them in other possible processes .
furthermore , it has been shown @xcite that the @xmath7 system can be used to test the einstein - podolsky - rosen ( epr ) paradox versus quantum theory .
the space - like , separated coherent quantum system may yield some @xmath0 decays if epr s locality is correct while quantum theory forbids this process .
mark - iii searched for decays of @xmath0 with 2.7 million @xmath2 events @xcite .
no signal was observed , and the upper limit on the decay branching ratio was determined to be @xmath10 at the 90% confidence level ( c. l. ) .
the same search for @xmath3 decays has not been performed before . in this letter , we report on a search for @xmath0 using a sample with 20 times more statistics than before , and on the first search for @xmath1 .
the data samples used for the analyses are taken with the beijing spectrometer ( besii ) detector at the beijing spectrometer ( bepc ) storage ring at a center - of - mass energies corresponding to @xmath11 and @xmath12 .
the data samples contain @xmath13 @xmath2 events and @xmath14 @xmath3 events , as determined from inclusive hadronic decays @xcite .
bes is a conventional solenoidal magnet detector that is described in detail in ref .
@xcite ; besii is the upgraded version of the detector @xcite . a 12-layer vertex chamber ( vc ) surrounding the beam pipe
provides trigger information .
a forty - layer main drift chamber ( mdc ) , located radially outside the vc , provides trajectory and energy loss ( @xmath15 ) information for charged tracks over @xmath16 of the total solid angle .
the momentum resolution is @xmath17 ( @xmath18 in @xmath19 ) , and the @xmath15 resolution for hadron tracks is @xmath20 .
an array of 48 scintillation counters surrounding the mdc measures the time - of - flight ( tof ) of charged tracks with a resolution of @xmath21 ps for hadrons .
radially outside the tof system is a 12 radiation length , lead - gas barrel shower counter ( bsc ) .
this measures the energies of electrons and photons over @xmath22 of the total solid angle with an energy resolution of @xmath23 ( @xmath24 in gev ) .
outside of the solenoidal coil , which provides a 0.4 tesla magnetic field over the tracking volume , is an iron flux return that is instrumented with three double layers of counters that identify muons of momentum greater than 0.5 gev/@xmath25 .
a monte carlo ( mc ) simulation is used for the determination of mass resolutions and detection efficiencies . for the signal channels , @xmath0 and @xmath1 ,
the angular distribution of one @xmath26 is generated with the same distribution as for the cp allowed channels @xmath27 and @xmath28 , namely as @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the polar angle of the @xmath26 in the laboratory system .
only @xmath31 is generated , and the @xmath26 is allowed to decay in the detector according to its lifetime . the simulation of the detector response is done using a geant3 based program with detailed consideration of the detector performance ( such as dead electronic channels ) .
reasonable agreement between data and monte carlo simulation has been observed in various channels tested , including @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 and @xmath35 @xmath36 . for this study ,
10,000 events for each signal channel are produced .
for the decay channels of interest , the candidate events are required to satisfy the following selection criteria : 1 .
the number of charged tracks is required to be four with net charge zero .
each track should satisfy @xmath37 , where @xmath30 is the polar angle in the mdc , and should have a good helix fit so that the error matrix of the track fitting is available for secondary vertex finding .
the tracks are assumed to be either @xmath38 or @xmath39 .
the higher momentum positive track and the lower momentum negative track are assumed to come from one of the @xmath26 decays , and the remaining two tracks are assumed to come from the other @xmath26 decay .
the intersection of the track - pairs near the interaction point are determined and are regarded as the @xmath26 vertices .
3 . each @xmath26 candidate is required to have a decay length in the transverse plane ( @xmath40 ) greater than 3 mm and an invariant mass within twice the mass resolution as estimated from monte carlo simulations ( the mass resolution in @xmath2 decays is 7.1 mev/@xmath41 and in @xmath3 decays 7.9 mev/@xmath41 ) . for @xmath3 decays , backgrounds from @xmath42 with @xmath2 decaying into two charged tracks
are removed by further requiring the mass recoiling against the lower momentum positive and negative tracks , @xmath43 , to be less than 3.0 gev/@xmath41 .
the comparison of the recoil mass distributions of signal and background events from monte carlo simulation is shown in figure [ mrec ] .
it can be seen that this requirement is very efficient in removing background , and the loss of efficiency is small ( @xmath44 4% ) . another possible background is from @xmath45 @xmath46 with @xmath47 .
figure [ pmiss ] shows @xmath7 missing momentum distributions for the signal and background channels , all simulated by monte carlo .
we make an additional requirement @xmath48 gev/@xmath25 for @xmath3 selection .
this removes 94% of @xmath49 background and almost all the @xmath50 background , while the efficiency for @xmath1 is about 92% according to monte carlo simulation . for @xmath2
decays , since @xmath51 is forbidden by parity conservation , no requirement is applied .
the momenta of the two @xmath26 tracks for events passing the above selection are plotted in figures [ pkspksj ] and [ pkspks ] , for @xmath2 and @xmath3 decays , respectively , together with the regions predicted for signal events by the monte carlo simulation .
the two circles correspond to @xmath52 where @xmath53 and @xmath54 are the momenta of the two @xmath26 candidates in the event ; @xmath55 is the @xmath26 momentum resolution , which is 28 mev/@xmath25 in @xmath2 decays and 34 mev/@xmath25 in @xmath3 decays , as determined from monte carlo simulations ; and @xmath56 is the expected @xmath26 momentum in @xmath2 ( 1.466 gev ) or @xmath3 ( 1.775 gev ) two - body decays .
the inner circles correspond to @xmath57 , and the outer circles are for @xmath58 .
it can be seen that there are no candidate events in either @xmath2 or @xmath3 decays within the one @xmath55 circle , and there is only one candidate in each case lying between the one and two @xmath55 circles . using the 2@xmath55 circle for our event selection
, one event is obtained each for @xmath0 and for @xmath1 .
the corresponding efficiencies , @xmath59 , are 20.74% and 19.18% for @xmath2 and @xmath3 decays , respectively , as estimated from monte carlo samples .
the backgrounds remaining in both @xmath2 and @xmath3 decays after the @xmath26 requirement are studied with monte carlo simulations .
the main background channel in @xmath2 decays is from @xmath60 is estimated to be @xmath61 events , which is obtained using a monte carlo sample six times as large as the @xmath2 sample .
the main backgrounds channels in @xmath3 decays are @xmath62 , @xmath63 and @xmath64 . a monte carlo simulation estimates the total background to be @xmath65 events , with about 80% due to @xmath63 .
the errors on the estimated backgrounds are from the uncertainties of the branching ratios used and the limited statistics of the monte carlo samples .
the two candidate events are investigated further , and it is found that the @xmath0 candidate is most likely a @xmath60 , with @xmath66 misidentified as @xmath31 because no particle identification is used in the event selection , while the @xmath1 candidate looks like a @xmath62 , @xmath63 event with an isolated photon with bsc energy of 126 mev .
due to the long decay length of the high momentum @xmath26 and the requirement of hits in the vc , the trigger efficiency of @xmath7 events is lower than for normal hadronic events .
since the trigger system is not included in the monte carlo simulation , the trigger efficiency is measured with data by comparing events within and beyond the outer radius of the vc using @xmath67 events , which yields trigger efficiencies of @xmath68 and @xmath69 for a single @xmath26 in @xmath2 and @xmath3 decays , respectively . for @xmath7 events ,
the trigger efficiency , @xmath70 , is calculated to be @xmath71% in @xmath2 decays and @xmath72% in @xmath3 decays .
the secondary vertex finding algorithm is checked using @xmath73 events .
it is found that the monte carlo simulates data fairly well , and extrapolating the difference between data and monte carlo simulation to the @xmath26 momentum range under study and correcting by the polar angle dependence of the efficiency , correction factors of @xmath74 and @xmath75 are obtained for a single @xmath26 in @xmath2 and @xmath3 decays , respectively . for @xmath7 decays , the correction factors and errors to the monte carlo efficiencies , @xmath76 , for @xmath0 and @xmath1 are @xmath77 and @xmath78 , respectively .
the total systematic error on the branching ratio measurement comes from all sources listed in table .
the simulation of the tracking efficiency agrees with data within 1 - 2% for each charged track as measured using channels like @xmath79 and @xmath80 , @xmath81 , and 8% is taken conservatively as the systematic error for the channel of interest .
.summary of the systematic errors . [ cols="<,^,^",options="header " , ] [ br ]
the cp violating processes @xmath0 and @xmath1 are searched for using the besii 58 million @xmath2 event and 14 million @xmath3 event samples . the upper limits on the branching ratios are determined to be @xmath82 and @xmath83 at the 95% c. l. the former is much more stringent than the previous mark - iii measurement @xcite , and the latter is the first search for this channel in @xmath3 decays .
current bounds of the production rates still beyond the sensitivity for testing the epr paradox @xcite .
we wish to thank dr .
h. b. li for helpful comments .
the bes collaboration thanks the staff of bepc for their hard efforts .
this work is supported in part by the national natural science foundation of china under contracts nos .
19991480 , 10225524 , 10225525 , the chinese academy of sciences under contract no .
kj 95t-03 , the 100 talents program of cas under contract nos .
u-11 , u-24 , u-25 , and the knowledge innovation project of cas under contract nos .
u-602 , u-34(ihep ) ; by the national natural science foundation of china under contract no .
10175060 ( ustc ) ; and by the department of energy under contract no .
de - fg03 - 94er40833 ( u hawaii ) . a summary on the cp violation in kaon and b decays can be found in k. hagiwara _ et al .
_ ( particle data group ) , phys . rev .
* d66 * , 010001 - 118 ( 2002 ) , and references therein . m. roos , `` test of einstein locality '' , hu - tft-80 - 5 ( revised ) , nov .
1980 , and references there in . | decay of @xmath6 charmonium states like to @xmath7 is cp violating process cp violations in @xmath8 systems established to search in other processes @xmath7 system test einstein - podolsky - rosen paradox versus quantum theory quantum system may yield @xmath0 decays if epr s locality correct quantum theory forbids mark - iii searched for decays @xmath0 with 2.7 million @xmath2 events no signal observed upper limit decay branching ratio @xmath10 at 90% confidence level search for @xmath3 decays not performed before on search for @xmath0 sample 20 times more statistics first search for @xmath1 data samples with beijing spectrometer ) detector at center - - mass energies @xmath11 and @xmath12 data samples contain @xmath13 @xmath2 @xmath14 @xmath3 events from inclusive hadronic decays conventional solenoidal magnet detector upgraded version 12-layer vertex chamber beam pipe provides trigger informationforty - layer main drift chamber outside vc provides trajectory energy loss information for charged tracks over @xmath16 solid angle momentum resolution @xmath17 @xmath15 resolution for hadron tracks @xmath20 48 scintillation counters measures time - of - flight charged tracks resolution @xmath21 for hadrons outside 12 radiation length lead - gas barrel shower counter measures energies electrons photons over @xmath22 solid angle energy resolution @xmath23 ( @xmath24 gev solenoidal coil provides 0.4 tesla magnetic field over volume iron flux return instrumented with three double layers counters momentum greater than 0.5 gev/@xmath25 monte carlo simulation for mass resolutions detection efficiencies signal channels @xmath0 @xmath1 angular distribution of @xmath26 generated same channels @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath30 polar angle @xmath26 only @xmath31 generated @xmath26 in detector lifetime simulation detector response using geant3 based program consideration detector performance agreement between data monte carlo simulation observed in channels tested @xmath32 @xmath36study 10,000 events each signal channel produced decay channels candidate events satisfy selection criteria charged tracks four net charge zero each track satisfy @xmath37 @xmath30 polar angle mdc good helix fit error secondary vertex finding tracks assumed @xmath38 or @xmath39 higher momentum positive lower momentum negative track from one @xmath26 decays remaining two tracks from other @xmath26 decay intersection track - pairs near interaction point @xmath26 vertices each @xmath26 candidate decay length transverse plane @xmath40 greater than 3 mm invariant mass twice mass resolution monte carlo simulations @xmath2 7.1 mev/ @xmath3 7.9 mev/ @xmath3 decays backgrounds from @xmath42 @xmath2 tracks removed mass recoiling against lower momentum positive negative tracks @xmath43 less than 3.0 gev/@xmath41 comparison recoil mass distributions background figure requirement efficient removing background loss efficiency small @xmath44 4% ) possible background from @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 figure shows @xmath7 missing momentum distributions signal background channels simulated monte carloadditional requirement @xmath48 gev/@xmath25 for @xmath3 selection removes 94% @xmath49 @xmath50 background efficiency @xmath1 92% monte carlo simulation @xmath2 decays @xmath51 forbidden parity conservation no requirement momenta two @xmath26 tracks selection plotted in figures @xmath2 @xmath3 decays regions predicted signal events monte carlo simulation circles to @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 momenta two @xmath26 candidates @xmath55 @xmath26 momentum resolution 28 mev/@xmath25 @xmath2 decays 34 mev/ decays @xmath56 expected @xmath26 momentum in @xmath2 decays inner circles @xmath57 outer circles @xmath58 no candidate events in @xmath2 or @xmath3 decays @xmath55 circle one candidate each between two circles@xmath55 circle event selection one event obtained for @xmath0 @xmath1 efficiencies @xmath59 20.74% and 19.18% for @xmath2 @xmath3 decays estimated from monte carlo samplesbackgrounds in @xmath2 decays after @xmath26 requirement studied with monte carlo simulations main background channel from @xmath60 estimated @xmath61 events obtained using carlo sample six times large main in @xmath3 decays are @xmath62 simulation estimates total background @xmath65 events 80% due to @xmath63 errors from uncertainties branching ratios limited statistics two candidate events investigated @xmath0 candidate likely @xmath60 @xmath66 misidentified as @xmath31 @xmath1 candidate looks like @xmath62 @xmath63 event isolated photon bsc energy 126 mev to long decay length high momentum @xmath26 requirement of hits vc trigger efficiency of @xmath7 events lower trigger system not included efficiency measured comparing events radius using @xmath67 events trigger efficiencies of @xmath68 and @xmath69 for @xmath26 in decays for @xmath7 events trigger efficiency @xmath70 calculated @xmath71% in in decays secondary vertex finding algorithm checked using @xmath73 eventsmonte carlo simulates data well extrapolating difference to @xmath26 momentum range polar angle dependence correction factors of @xmath74 @xmath75 obtained for @xmath26 @xmath2 @xmath3 decays @xmath7 decays correction factors errors to monte carlo efficiencies @xmath76 @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath77 @xmath78 total systematic error on branching ratio measurement from sources table simulation tracking efficiency agrees with data within 1 - 2% each charged track @xmath79 @xmath80 8% systematic error channel systematic errors cp violating processes @xmath0 @xmath1 searched 58 million @xmath2 14 million @xmath3 event samples upper limits branching ratios @xmath82 and @xmath83 at 95% c. l former more stringent than previous measurement latter first search for channel in @xmath3 decays production rates beyond sensitivity for testing epr paradox @xcite dr . h. b. li comments thanks staff bepc work supported by national natural science foundation china chinese academy of sciences95t-03 100 talents program cas contract nos u-11 u-24 u-25 knowledge innovation project contract u-602 u-34 national natural science foundation china contract 10175060 department energy contract de - fg03 - 94er40833 hawaii summary cp violation kaon b decays hagiwara et al particle data group . rev. d66 010001 - 118 2002 references roos test einstein locality hu - tft-80 - 5 revised nov . 1980 references | 0.430816 | 2,867 | 1,493 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,903 | a mechanism of a chiral spin wave rotation is introduced to systematically generate mesoscopic greenberger - horne - zeilinger states . | one of the astounding principles of quantum mechanics is that a quantum object can exist in a superposition state , _
e.g. _ , a spin in a superposition of up and down states , @xmath0 .
applying this principle to two quantum particles , a superposition state such as a singlet state @xmath1 allows the instantaneous determination of the quantum state of the second particle after one measures the quantum state of the first particle , as revealed by einstein , podolsky and rosen in 1935 @xcite .
this instantaneous determination seems like a violation of a principle of the special relativity , _ i.e. _ , nothing can travel faster than light , leading to the so called epr paradox
. the incompleteness of quantum mechanics and the existence of hidden variables were therefore suspected . in a seminal paper by bell in 1964 @xcite , an equality was proposed to show that the statistical results of quantum mechanics is incompatible with any local hidden variable theories .
subsequent experiments overwhelmingly support the predictions of quantum mechanics . in particular ,
any local hidden variable theories are excluded by loophole - free experiments in 2015 @xcite . in the exploration of epr paradox ,
the greenberger - horne - zeilinger ( ghz ) states @xcite play an important role .
it concerns with a three - particle entangled state , @xmath2 , which allows a direct contradiction between the predictions of quantum mechanics and local hidden variable theories with a single test , in contrast to the statistical nature of the bell s inequality .
ghz states have also been found useful in the heisenberg limit metrology @xcite .
mesoscopic ghz states with @xmath3 particles @xmath4 can be generated by using the mlmer - srensen approach @xcite in ion traps , with @xmath3 up to 14 in experiments @xcite . to generate ghz states in a wide range of quantum systems ,
new mechanisms are highly wanted .
here we introduce a quantum zipper " to sew ghz states in a systematic way . ) .
5 , send a @xmath5 pulse to flip the second spin .
6 , send in a @xmath5 pulse to flip the fourth spin . 7 ,
introduce the same interaction as in step 4 among the red spins until achieving the state shown in this step .
8 , send a @xmath5 pulse to flip the third spin . repeat the steps 6 - 8 until zipping all spins in the ghz state , each time adding two spins to the ghz chain . for a ghz state with @xmath6 spins ,
we need in total @xmath7 @xmath5 pulses and one @xmath8 pulse . ]
the basic process for generating ghz states is shown in fig . [
we start with an all - down state and send a @xmath5 pulse to the first spin to flip it up .
then we send a @xmath8 pulse to prepare the second spin in a superposition of the up and down states .
the following step 4 is crucial .
we introduce a special interaction between the first three spins , which undergo opposite chiral spin wave rotations for @xmath9 and @xmath10 states , [ eq1 ] |||| , [ ea ] + the spin states move to the right for the states containing one up spin while they move to the left for the states containing two up spins .
the step 4 corresponds to the rotations @xmath11 and @xmath12 in eq.([eq1 ] ) .
we then send a @xmath5 pulse to the second spin and prepare the first three spins in a ghz state , as shown in the step 5 . following and repeating the steps 6 - 8 ( see fig.[scheme ] caption ) , we can zip the following spins into a ghz state .
in a previous work , we studied chiral photon rotations among three cavities by generating a synthetic magnetic field @xcite . the process in eq.([eq1 ] ) can be realized in a similar way by the following hamiltonian , @xmath13 where @xmath14 and @xmath15 are the raising and lowering operators for the @xmath16th spin and the summation over @xmath16 is cyclic .
the hamiltonian in eq.([hspin ] ) commutes with @xmath17 and the number of up spins is conserved .
we first investigate the dynamics in the subspace expanded by @xmath9 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 , in which the eigen frequencies are @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 .
the corresponding eigenstates are the evolution of the initial state @xmath23 is @xmath24.\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is clear that at time @xmath25 , @xmath26 , and at time @xmath27 , @xmath28 .
we obtain the chiral spin wave rotation in eq .
( [ eq1]@xmath29 ) .
we can follow the same procedure to calculate the dynamics in the subspace with two up spins , @xmath10 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
the spin states move to the left , as shown in eq .
( [ eq1]@xmath32 ) . to understand this surprising result
, we try to know how @xmath10 evolves based on the knowledge that the state @xmath9 rotates to the right . by reversing our definition of up and down ,
the state @xmath10 becomes @xmath9 in the new basis . to express the hamiltonian in this upside down basis
, we need to make the replacement @xmath33 and @xmath34 , which results in @xmath35 .
the state evolves backward in time , _
i.e. _ , the spin wave moves to the left .
the key feature of the hamiltonian in eq.([hspin ] ) is the imaginary interaction strength between the spins .
previously we proposed the synthetic magnetic field for photons by oscillating the frequencies of three cavities that are coupled to the same spin @xcite . here
we consider three spins with oscillating frequencies coupled to the same cavity mode .
let us first consider two spins with frequencies being modulated with different phases .
the interaction hamiltonian can be written as @xmath36+h.c.,\ ] ] where @xmath29 is the annihilation operator of the cavity , @xmath37 , @xmath38 and @xmath39 are the modulation amplitude , frequency and phase for the @xmath16th spin .
we assume the central frequencies of the spins are the same as that of the cavity .
since @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the @xmath42th order bessel function of the first kind , we can expand the interaction hamiltonian @xmath43 , where @xmath44 + i^nj_n(-f)\hbar g [ \sigma^+_1 e^{in\phi_1}+\sigma^+_2 e^{in\phi_2}]a,\ ] ] the effective hamiltonian is @xcite , @xmath45\\ = h_0+i\frac{\hbar g^2}{\nu_d}\eta(\sigma_2^+\sigma_1 ^ --\sigma_1^+\sigma_2 ^ -).\ ] ] where @xmath46/n$ ] .
when @xmath47 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 , we obtain the imaginary interaction strength between the two spins .
we introduce the third spin with the same modulation amplitude @xmath37 and frequency @xmath38 but a different phase @xmath50 , and we set @xmath51 .
we obtain @xmath52 in eq .
( [ hspin ] ) with @xmath53 and @xmath54 . in the experiments ,
the transition frequencies of the spins can be modulated by the dynamic stark shift of a detuned light field with modulated intensities .
the spins can be atoms coupled to a one - dimensional waveguide that can mediate long range interactions between atoms @xcite . | quantum mechanics quantum object in superposition state to two particles superposition state allows determination of quantum state second particle after first revealed by einstein podolsky rosen in 1935 determination violation of principle special relativity faster than light to epr paradox incompleteness of quantum mechanics existence of hidden variables suspected in paper by bell in 1964 equality proposed statistical results quantum mechanics incompatible with local hidden variable theories subsequent experiments support predictions local hidden variable theories excluded by loophole - free experiments in 2015 in exploration of epr paradox greenberger - horne - zeilinger ghz ) states important role with three - particle entangled state @xmath2 allows contradiction between predictions quantum mechanics and local hidden variable theories with single test contrast to bell s inequality ghz states useful in heisenberg limit metrology mesoscopic ghz states with @xmath3 particles @xmath4 generated mlmer - srensen approach in ion traps experiments to generate ghz states in systems new mechanisms wanted quantum zipper to sew ghz statessend @xmath5 pulse flip second spin @xmath5 pulse flip fourth spin introduce interaction step 4 red spins until achieving state send @xmath5 pulse flip third spin repeat steps 6 - 8 until zipping all spins ghz state adding two spins chain ghz state @xmath6 spins need @xmath7 @xmath5 pulses one @xmath8 pulse process generating ghz states shown fig . start all - down state send @xmath5 pulse first spin flip @xmath8 pulse prepare second spin up down states step 4 crucial special interaction first three spins opposite chiral spin wave rotations @xmath9 @xmath10 states spin states move right states one up spin left two up spins step 4 corresponds rotations @xmath11 and @xmath12 send @xmath5 pulse second spin prepare first three spins ghz state step 5 steps 6 - 8 zip spins ghz state studied chiral photon rotations three cavities generating synthetic magnetic field @xcite process eq([eq1 realized by hamiltonian @xmath13 @xmath14 raising lowering operators for @xmath16th spin summation over @xmath16 cyclic hamiltonian in.([hspin commutes with @xmath17 up spins conserved investigate dynamics in subspace expanded by @xmath9 eigen frequencies @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 eigenstates evolution of initial state @xmath23 @xmath24. @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 obtain chiral spin wave rotation in eq .@xmath29 ) procedure calculate dynamics subspace with two up spins @xmath10 @xmath31 spin states move to left in eq . eq1]@xmath32 ) @xmath10 evolves state @xmath9 rotates right reversing definition state @xmath10 becomes @xmath9 express hamiltonian @xmath33 @xmath34 results in @xmath35 state evolves backward spin wave moves to left key feature of hamiltonian in eq.([hspin ] ) imaginary interaction strength between spinsproposed synthetic magnetic field photons oscillating frequencies three cavities same spin @xcite consider three spins oscillating frequencies same cavity mode consider two spins modulated different phases interaction hamiltonian @xmath36+h.c. @xmath29 annihilation operator cavity @xmath37 modulation amplitude frequency phase @xmath16th spin assume central frequencies spins same as cavity @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42th order bessel function first expand interaction hamiltonian @xmath43 @xmath44 +^nj_n(\hbar\sigma\sigma^+_2 effective hamiltonian @xcite @xmath45\\ = h_0+i\frac{\sigma_2+\sigma_1 @xmath46/n$ @xmath47 @xmath49 obtain imaginary interaction strength between two spins introduce third spin same modulation amplitude @xmath37 frequency @xmath38 different phase @xmath50 set @xmath51 obtain @xmath52 with @xmath53 @xmath54 transition frequencies spins modulated by dynamic shift detuned light field modulated intensitiesspins atoms coupled one - dimensional waveguide long range interactions | 0.307825 | 1,732 | 883 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,908 | spectroscopy and photometry demonstrate that ssspm j1549@xmath03544 is not a cool white dwarf but a high velocity metal - poor halo star . | cool white dwarfs are typically identified through the combination of proper motion and apparent magnitude called reduced proper motion @xcite . at a given brightness and color
, white dwarfs will have larger proper motions than main sequence stars owing to closer distances from the earth implied by their small radii .
metal - poor stars , or subdwarfs , also stand out well in reduced proper motion diagrams due to their lower luminosities ( for the same color class ) and typically higher velocities .
subluminous main sequence stars which distinguish themselves in reduced proper motion are kinematic members of the thick disk and halo @xcite .
subdwarfs have long been a contaminant in surveys aiming to find cool white dwarfs because both stellar types are mixed in a reduced proper motion diagram at intermediate colors .
cool white dwarfs must be confirmed spectroscopically @xcite .
current complete and ongoing large - scale proper motion surveys are discovering numerous exotic objects including extreme subdwarfs , brown dwarfs , and cool white dwarfs ( see @xcite and references therein ) .
most if not all of these searches are utilizing available large - scale optical photographic sky survey catalogs .
this is potentially problematic for the identification of cool white dwarfs because optical photographic bandpasses do not yield broad color baselines , and photographic photometry has intrinsically large errors .
these facts lead to a large overlap in the white dwarf and subdwarf sequences in reduced proper motion diagrams @xcite .
yet even with spectroscopy , subdwarfs and other weak - lined objects can appear featureless in low resolution and/or low signal - to - noise ( s / n ) measurements potentially mistaken as dc white dwarfs @xcite .
identification of degenerates with @xmath1 k should include good s / n spectroscopy covering blue - green optical wavelengths @xcite . contrary to the claim of @xcite , this paper presents evidence that the high proper motion star ssspm j1549@xmath03544 ( @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 , @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 , j2000 ) is neither the nearest cool white dwarf nor a degenerate star , but rather a very high velocity halo star passing through the solar neighborhood .
optical @xmath8 photometric data were obtained 14 february 2005 with the orthogonal parallel transfer imaging camera ( optic ; @xcite ) on the university of hawaii 2.2 meter telescope at mauna kea . observing conditions were photometric with seeing @xmath9 and some gusty winds @xmath10 mph .
three identical exposures of ssspm j1549@xmath03544 were taken at each bandpass for a total integration time of @xmath11 seconds , yielding s / n @xmath12 at all wavelengths in a @xmath13 aperture radius .
a standard landolt field @xcite was observed similarly immediately following the science target .
the images were flat fielded , cleaned of bad pixels in the region of interest , and combined into a single frame at each wavelength for photometry .
calibration was performed with three stars and aperture photometry was executed using standard iraf packages .
calibrator stars were measured in a @xmath14 aperture radius and the science target data were corrected to this standard aperture and adjusted for relative extinction .
the results are listed in table [ tbl-1 ] .
optical @xmath15 spectroscopic data were obtained 18 march 2005 with the double beam spectrograph ( dbs ; @xcite ) on the australian national university 2.3 m telescope at siding spring observatory .
only the red arm of the spectrograph was operated , with no dichroic in the beam .
the 158 l / mm grating used gave a spectral resolution of 10 ( 2.5 pixels ) with the @xmath16 slit .
the seeing was @xmath17 and the sky was clear .
ssspm j1549@xmath03544 and the flux calibrator ltt 6248 were each observed for 600 seconds , yielding s / n @xmath18 over the majority of the science target wavelength shown in figure [ fig1 ] .
the spectral images were flat fielded , cleaned of bad pixels in the region of interest , and flux calibrated spectra were extracted using standard iraf packages .
the spectra were trimmed to show the region of interest , while no attempt was made to remove telluric features .
the combined optical and near - infrared colors of ssspm j1549@xmath03544 are consistent with a main sequence star of @xmath19 k , late k spectral type @xcite .
the near - infrared magnitudes are too bright for known cool and ultracool white dwarfs @xcite .
for example , the reddest known degenerates have colors which peak near @xmath20 , after which they become bluer again as shown by observation and models ( excepting pure helium models at @xmath21 k ; @xcite ) , while ssspm j1549@xmath03544 has @xmath22 .
the spectrum in figure [ fig1 ] confirms the status of ssspm j1549@xmath03544 as a nondegenerate star , and the deep mgh feature near 5200 indicates it is metal - poor @xcite .
other unlabelled spectral features present include : weak h@xmath23 , several fe and ca lines , plus some weak cah and tio .
these latter features are difficult to distinguish as they are located , for the most part , within and around the prominent telluric bands @xcite which are also seen in the calibrator star spectrum . following the methodology of @xcite ,
a spectral type and subdwarf class of ssspm j1549@xmath03544 was estimated by measuring the tio5 , cah1 , cah2 , & cah3 spectroscopic indices , which are listed in table [ tbl-2 ] . using equations @xmath24 in @xcite , a spectral type of k5
is found consistently across all three relations , and type sdk5 is found using equation 7 in the same work . however , given the fact that the spectral resolution achieved here is @xmath25 times lower than that of @xcite , the spectroscopic measurments may be unreliable but are presented here as a rough guide .
there are no distinctions between sdk and esdk stars before spectral type k7 , and , combined with the uncertain spectroscopy , it is difficult to say whether or not ssspm j1549@xmath03544 is an extreme subdwarf without a direct metallicity measurment . the mgh band near 5200 is quite strong and an extreme subdwarf classification might be appropriate @xcite . in order to assess the kinematics of ssspm j1549@xmath03544
, a distance must be estimated . conservatively assuming this star lies two magnitudes below the main sequence at spectral type k5
, it would have @xmath26 mag @xcite .
this would place the star at @xmath27 pc with a tangential speed of 430 km s@xmath28 based on the astrometic data in @xcite .
furthermore , fourteen spectral lines ( many without high s / n ) were used to measure the radial velocity , the crude result being @xmath29 km s@xmath28 , corrected for the motion of the earth along the line of sight on the date of observation . combining all this data , a galactic @xmath30 space motion was calculated , corrected for the solar motion , @xmath31 km s@xmath28 @xcite , relative to the local standard of rest ( @xmath32 positive toward the galactic anticenter , @xmath33 positive in the direction of galactic rotation , @xmath34 positive toward the north galactic pole ) .
the result is @xmath35 km s@xmath28 , making ssspm j1549@xmath03544 a halo star @xcite .
if we instead assume @xmath36 due to the potential unreliability of the measured radial velocity , the result becomes @xmath37 km s@xmath28 , which is still consistent with halo membership . despite a fairly conservative assumption ,
the 114 pc distance estimate and space motions should be considered preliminary as subdwarfs can span a wide range of absolute magnitudes .
if ssspm j1549@xmath03544 is closer to 150 pc , or around 1.5 magnitudes below the main sequence , it would have a total heliocentric velocity in the range @xmath38 km s@xmath28 . at one magnitude below the main sequence , or 180 pc , ssspm
j1549@xmath03544 would have a total galactocentric velocity of @xmath39 km s@xmath28 and would be among the fastest moving stars ever seen @xcite .
the star ssspm j1549@xmath03544 is shown to be a metal - poor sdk star rather than a cool white dwarf as previously claimed @xcite .
it is possible this star is an extreme k subdwarf , but in any case it is a very high velocity halo star passing through the solar neighborhood . with many new proper motion objects being discovered and studied ,
it is critical to correctly distinguish cool white dwarfs from subdwarf contaminants .
there is great science potential in the oldest degenerates .
some data used in this paper are part of the two micron all sky survey , a joint project of the university of massachusetts and the infrared processing and analysis center / california institute of technology , funded by the national aeronautics and space administration ( nasa ) and the national science foundation .
j. farihi acknowledges support by grants from nasa .
prw acknowledges the support provided by a grant from the australian research council . | white dwarfs identified through reduced proper motion brightness white dwarfs larger motions than main sequence stars closer distances from earth small radii metal - poor stars subdwarfs stand out in reduced motion diagrams lower luminosities higher velocities subluminous sequence stars in kinematic members of thick disk halo subdwarfs contaminant in surveys cool white dwarfs mixed in must confirmed spectroscopically current large - scale motion surveys discovering exotic objects extreme subdwarfs brown dwarfs cool white dwarfs searches large - scale optical photographic sky survey catalogs problematic for identification cool white dwarfs optical bandpasses broad color baselines photometry large errors to large overlap in white dwarf subdwarf sequences in reduced motion diagrams subdwarfs weak - lined objects can appear featureless in low resolution - noise measurements potentially mistaken as dc white dwarfs identification of degenerates with should include good s / n spectroscopy blue - green wavelengthsclaim @xcite paper presents evidence high motion star ssspm j1549@xmath03544 cool white dwarf degenerate star high velocity halo star solar neighborhood optical @xmath8 photometric data obtained 14 february 2005 camera university hawaii 2.2 meter telescope mauna kea conditions photometric @xmath9 gusty winds mph three exposures total integration time @xmath11 seconds yielding s / n @xmath12 all wavelengths @xmath13 aperture radius standard landolt field @xcite observed images flat fielded cleaned bad pixels combined single frame photometry calibration three stars aperture photometry standard iraf packages calibrator stars measured @xmath14 aperture radius data corrected adjusted for relative extinction results listed in table optical @xmath15 spectroscopic data obtained 18 march 2005 double beam spectrograph australian national university 2.3 m telescope siding spring observatory red arm operated no dichroic 158 l / mm grating spectral resolution 10 ( 2.5 pixels ) @xmath16 slit seeing @xmath17 sky clearssspm j1549@xmath03544 flux calibrator ltt 6248 observed 600 seconds yielding @xmath18 science target wavelength spectral images flat fielded cleaned bad pixels flux calibrated spectra extracted iraf packages spectra trimmed show region interest no telluric features optical near - infrared colors of ssspm j1549@xmath03544 consistent with main sequence star @xmath19 k late k spectral type @xcite near - infrared magnitudes bright for cool ultracool white dwarfs @xcite reddest degenerates peak near @xmath20 bluer ssspm j1549@xmath03544 has @xmath22 spectrum confirms j1549@xmath03544 nondegenerate star deep mgh feature near 5200 indicates metal - poor @xcite unlabelled spectral features weak h@xmath23 fe ca lines weak cah tio difficult distinguish within around telluric bands @xcite spectral type subdwarf class of ssspm j1549@xmath03544 estimated measuring tio5 cah1 cah2 cah3 spectroscopic indices listed in table ]equations @xmath24 @xcite spectral type k5 across three relations type sdk5 equation 7 spectral resolution @xmath25 times lower @xcite spectroscopic measurments unreliable rough guide no distinctions between sdk esdk stars before spectral type k7 uncertain spectroscopy difficult say ssspm j1549@xmath03544 extreme subdwarf without metallicity measurment mgh band near 5200 strong extreme subdwarf classification might appropriate @xcite assess kinematics ssspm j1549@xmath03544 distance estimated star two magnitudes below main sequence at spectral type k5 @xmath26 mag @xcite at @xmath27 pc tangential speed 430 km s@xmath28 astrometic data fourteen spectral lines radial velocity result @xmath29 km s@xmath28 corrected for motion earth galactic @xmath30 space motion calculated corrected solar motion @xmath31 km s@xmath28 @xcite local standard of rest @xmath32 galactic anticenter galactic rotation north galactic pole result @xmath35 km s@xmath28 ssspm j1549@xmath03544 halo star @xciteassume @xmath36 unreliability radial velocity result @xmath37 km s@xmath28 consistent with halo membership 114 pc distance estimate space motions preliminary subdwarfs span magnitudes ssspm j1549@xmath03544 closer to 150 pc 1.5 magnitudes below main sequence total heliocentric velocity @xmath38 km s@xmath28 one magnitude below main sequence 180 pc j1549@xmath03544 galactocentric velocity @xmath39 km s@xmath28 fastest moving stars seen @xcite j1549@xmath03544 metal - poor sdk star cool white dwarf possible extreme k subdwarf high velocity halo star solar neighborhood objects critical distinguish cool white dwarfs from subdwarf contaminants science potential in oldest degenerates data two micron all sky survey joint project university of massachusetts infrared processing analysis center / california institute of technology funded national aeronautics space administration nasa national science foundation j. farihi grants nasa grant australian research council | 0.317903 | 2,100 | 1,100 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,909 | we examine the properties of nearly extremal black holes produced by gravitational collapse .
it is shown that an observer who crosses the black hole horizon at late times rapidly encounters a singularity . | nonrotating black holes with both mass and charge have two horizons : the outer horizon is the actual event horizon of the black hole , while the inner horizon is unstable to small perturbations , and is conjectured to become singular in any realistic situation.@xcite for such black holes the charge is always less than or equal to the mass , with the special case of charge equals mass called an extreme black hole . in the limit as the charge approaches the mass , the two horizons merge .
thus , as pointed out by marolf@xcite one might expect that in some sense extreme black holes have singular event horizons .
more precisely , it is claimed in @xcite that an observer crossing the event horizon encounters a singularity a short time later and that this short time goes to zero in the limit of extremality .
the treatment of @xcite used an eternal black hole , whereas physical black holes are formed by gravitational collapse . in this paper
we treat the problem of nearly extreme black holes formed by gravitational collapse . for simplicity ,
we use collapse of a charged thin shell .
we then consider a free fall observer who falls into such a black hole at late times and calculate the time it takes for him to reach the singularity .
methods and results are presented in section 2 and conclusions are presented in section 3 .
a charged , nonrotating , black hole is described by the reissner - nordstrom metric @xmath0 where the quantity @xmath1 is given by @xmath2 where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are respectively the mass and charge of the black hole .
the quantity @xmath1 vanishes at the outer and inner horizons of the black hole , which are located respectively at @xmath5 and @xmath6 where @xmath7 the coordinate system in eqn.([rn ] ) becomes singular at the horizons , thus to describe the process of gravitational collapse and black hole formation , we need a different coordinate system .
we therefore use eddington - finkelstein coordinates ( @xmath8 ) where @xmath9 is given by @xmath10 in these coordinates the reissner - nordstrom metric becomes @xmath11 the coordinate @xmath9 is constant along ingoing light rays .
one can also define an analogous coordinate @xmath12 which is constant along outgoing light rays . with a series of coordinate patches of this type
, one can cover the extended reissner - nordstrom spacetime , which is shown in fig .
( [ fig1 ] ) . however , the extended reissner - nordstrom spacetime is too large to represent what actually happens in gravitational collapse .
this is for two different reasons : first when a charged , spherical object collapses , it is only the spacetime outside the object that is described by the reissner - nordstrom metric .
thus , to describe gravitational collapse , one must find the path of the outer surface of the collapsing object , and then cut out all parts of the diagram of fig .
( [ fig1 ] ) that are outside that surface and replace them with something appropriate for the interior of the collapsing object .
the second reason is that small perturbations of the reissner - nordstrom solution blow up as @xmath13 ( which is also a null surface at @xmath14 ) .
therefore , to get the appropriate diagram , one must replace this null surface with a null singularity and cut out all portions of the diagram to the future of this surface . in the end one
obtains a restricted portion of the extended reissner - nordstrom spacetime , which can be covered by a single coordinate patch of the sort used in eqn .
( [ rnef ] ) . the extended reissner - nordstrom spacetime . here
the outer and inner horizons are represented by solid lines at 45 degree angles to the vertical , while the timelike singularity is denoted by a dashed line ] we want a simple model for gravitational collapse to form the black hole , so we choose a thin shell of charged dust .
thin shells in general relativity are described by the israel formalism@xcite in which the history of the shell is a timelike hypersurface @xmath15 separating two spacetimes ( labeled @xmath16 and @xmath17 and which are respectively the exterior and the interior of the shell ) .
the intrinsic metric @xmath18 is continuous , while the extrinsic curvature @xmath19 is discontinuous and satisfies @xmath20 = - 8 \pi \left ( { t_{ab } } - { \textstyle { \frac 1 2 } } t { h_{ab } } \right ) \label{israelshell}\ ] ] where @xmath21 is the delta function stress - energy of the shell . here ,
for any quantity @xmath22 we define @xmath23= { \phi _ + } -{\phi _ -}$ ] where the quantity @xmath24 is @xmath22 on @xmath15 evaluated from the @xmath16 side ( and correspondingly for @xmath25 ) .
the worldsheet of the shell is given by @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the proper time of an observer in the shell .
the stress - energy of the dust shell takes the form @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the four - velocity of the shell and @xmath30 is the shell s mass per unit area . as shown by de la cruz and israel@xcite , kuchar@xcite and chase@xcite eqn.([israelshell ] ) can be used to find the equation of motion of the shell as follows : the exterior of the shell is a reissner - nordstrom spacetime .
spherical symmetry implies that the extrinsic curvature takes the form @xmath31 combining eqns .
( [ israelshell ] ) , ( [ shellstress ] ) and ( [ kdecomp ] ) yields @xmath32 = - 4 \pi \sigma \label{bjump}\ ] ] @xmath33 = - 4 \pi \sigma \label{cjump}\ ] ] a straightforward calculation using eqn.([rnef ] ) shows that the quantities @xmath34 and @xmath35 are given by @xmath36 where an overdot denotes derivative with respect to @xmath37 .
since the interior of the shell is minkowski spacetime , expressions for @xmath34 and @xmath35 for the shell interior are given by eqns ( [ beqn ] ) and ( [ ceqn ] ) with @xmath1 replaced by @xmath38 .
applying eqn .
( [ ceqn ] ) to eqn .
( [ cjump ] ) yields @xmath39 then using eqns .
( [ bjump ] ) , ( [ beqn ] ) , and ( [ motion1 ] ) yields @xmath40 which means that there is a constant @xmath41 such that @xmath42 using this result in eqn .
( [ motion1 ] ) and solving for @xmath43 yields @xmath44 path of the thin shell in the reissner - nordstrom spacetime . here
nonsingular horizons are denoted by solid lines , and the null singularity by a dashed line ] we start the shell at a large radius with a speed @xmath45 in the inward direction .
then it follows from eqn .
( [ motion2 ] ) that @xmath46 we also introduce the quantity @xmath47 defined by @xmath48 since we are considering nearly extremal black holes , @xmath49 .
expressing eqn .
( [ motion2 ] ) in terms of @xmath50 and @xmath45 we obtain @xmath51 \right ) } ^2 } \label{motion3}\ ] ] we have @xmath52 , so @xmath53 is just slightly less than @xmath54 and therefore the shell will cross @xmath53 a short ( proper ) time after crossing @xmath54 .
it is also true that the perturbed black hole becomes singular at @xmath53 .
however , it is here that the use of eddington - finkelstein coordinates becomes essential . in the collapse process , there are two different null surfaces at @xmath14 , an outgoing null surface where @xmath9 is finite , and which is not singular , and an ingoing null surface which occurs in the limit as @xmath13 , and which is singular
. the question then becomes , which of these surfaces does the shell cross first ? to answer this question , we note that there is a function @xmath55 such that on the worldsheet of the shell @xmath56 . then from eqn .
( [ rnef ] ) it follows that @xmath57 and therefore that @xmath58 however , the null coordinate @xmath9 always increases towards the future , fixing the sign above to be plus , so we obtain @xmath59 note that in this equation , if @xmath60 when @xmath1 vanishes , then @xmath61 remains finite ; but if @xmath62 when @xmath1 vanishes then @xmath63 .
since the shell starts out ingoing , and since it can not change direction between the two horizons ( where @xmath64 is a timelike coordinate ) then it follows that the shell first crosses @xmath53 at a place where @xmath9 remains finite , and where therefore the spacetime remains nonsingular . after crossing @xmath65 ,
the shell reaches a minimum radius @xmath66 and then re - expands .
it follows from eqn .
( [ motion3 ] ) that @xmath67 where we have neglected any terms higher than zeroth order in @xmath47 . after reaching @xmath66 the shell re - expands , and eventually reaches @xmath53 .
note , however , that this time the shell approaches @xmath53 with @xmath68 .
it then follows from eqn .
( [ dotv ] ) that @xmath9 diverges as @xmath69 and thus that the shell approaches the null singularity .
the path of the shell in the usual penrose diagram of the reissner - nordstrom spacetime is shown in fig .
( [ fig2 ] ) .
the shell clearly takes a non - neglible amount of proper time to encounter the singularity , and this will also be true of an observer who falls into the black hole shortly after it forms .
however , as we will see , things are somewhat different for an observer who falls in at late times .
since for such an observer , @xmath70 when the outer horizon is crossed , and since @xmath9 increases along future directed timelike curves , it follows that @xmath70 when the observer encounters the shell .
therefore , we are led to consider the behavior of the shell at large @xmath9 . we know that as @xmath13 we have @xmath69 and therefore @xmath71
however , we will need to know how rapidly @xmath71 at large @xmath9 . from eqn .
( [ dotv ] ) it follows that on the shell we have @xmath72 then using eqns .
( [ f ] ) and ( [ dvdr ] ) and neglecting any terms that are higher order in the small quantities @xmath1 and @xmath47 we find that on the shell at large @xmath9 we have @xmath73 the solution of this equation is @xmath74 where @xmath75 is a constant . note that there are two separate regimes where this equation simplifies .
for @xmath76 we have @xmath77 while for @xmath78 we have @xmath79 $ ] .
we now consider the fate of a free - fall observer who falls into the black hole at late times .
just as the shell has four - velocity @xmath80 , denote the four - velocity of the observer by @xmath81 . due to the time translation symmetry of the reissner - nordstrom spacetime
, the observer has a conserved energy per unit mass @xmath82 given by @xmath83 since @xmath84 is a unit timelike vector , the same reasoning that led to eqn .
( [ dotv ] ) yields @xmath85 using eqns .
( [ energy ] ) and ( [ dotv2 ] ) we find @xmath86 at late times , the shell is approximately at @xmath53 and for the region in between @xmath54 and @xmath53 we have @xmath87 .
thus the observer crosses the shell approximately a proper time @xmath88 after crossing the outer horizon . to find the amount of proper time that it takes for the observer to encounter the singularity , we must also find the behavior of the observer in the interior of the shell . to begin with ,
we calculate the quantity @xmath89 when the observer crosses the shell . from eqn .
( [ rn ] ) we find @xmath90 then using eqns . ( [ dotv ] ) , ( [ dotv2 ] ) and ( [ vdotu ] ) we obtain @xmath91 since when the observer crosses the shell we have @xmath68 and @xmath92 it follows that to lowest order in @xmath47 @xmath93 and then using eqn .
( [ motion3 ] ) we obtain @xmath94 path of the geodesic observer ( thin curve ) in the spacetime formed by the collapse of the thin shell . here
nonsingular horizons are denoted by solid lines , and the null singularity by a dashed line ] since @xmath1 is very small when the observer crosses the shell , it follows that @xmath89 is very large there .
however , since @xmath84 satisfies the geodesic equation , and since the christoffel symbols in the thin shell spacetimes have only jumps rather than delta functions , it follows that @xmath84 is continuous across the shell .
since the thin shell formalism also requires that the metric and @xmath29 are continuous across the shell , it follows that immediately upon entering the interior of the shell @xmath89 is still given by the expression in eqn .
( [ vdotu4 ] ) .
but the interior of the shell is minkowski spacetime , and the shell has @xmath95 so it follows from eqn .
( [ vdotu4 ] ) that in the rest frame of the center of the shell , the observer is an ingoing geodesic with @xmath96 this is a very large @xmath97 factor , so even though the observer must travel a distance of @xmath98 ( to the center and back ) to encounter the singularity , this only takes a proper time of @xmath99 since @xmath1 is given by eqn .
( [ flargev ] ) it follows that this is a very small proper time . the motion of the observer is shown in fig .
( [ fig3 ] )
though the pictures drawn are somewhat different , our calculations agree with the main conclusion of @xcite .
for a nearly extremal black hole formed by gravitational collapse an observer crossing the event horizon at late times almost immediately encounters a curvature singularity .
note however , that this statement involves two different small numbers : @xmath47 which expresses how close to extremality the black hole is , and @xmath100 which measures how late the observer crosses the black hole event horizon .
( here @xmath101 is the value of @xmath9 at which the observer crosses the horizon ) . in all cases , the proper time from event horizon
to shell is of order @xmath102 .
for @xmath103 the proper time from shell to singularity is of order @xmath104 , while for @xmath105 the proper time from shell to singularity is completely negligible .
we now consider the effect the nature of the singularity could have on this result . throughout
, we have assumed that the singularity is null .
however , it is generally thought that when black holes form the singularity starts out null near the horizon and then becomes spacelike further inside the black hole .
however , any such change would only serve to decrease the amount of time it would take for an observer to encounter the singularity , so the conclusion that the observer encounters the singularity almost immediately after crossing the event horizon remains true .
finally note that the collapsing thin shell is only one simple model for the formation of a charged black hole by gravitational collapse .
it would be interesting to consider other models ( _ e.g. _ the collapse of a charged scalar field ) to see whether the features found in the shell model continue to hold .
i would like to thank ratin akhoury , ryo saotome , eric poisson , gary horowitz , and don marolf for useful discussions .
this work was supported by nsf grant phy-0855532 to oakland university .
poisson e and israel w 1990 _ phys .
rev . _ * d41 * 1796 | nonrotating black holes with mass and charge have two horizons outer event inner unstable to conjectured to become singular in charge less than or equal to mass case charge equals mass extreme black hole charge approaches mass two horizons merge extreme black holes have singular event horizons observer crossing event horizon encounters singularity short time later goes to zero in limit treatment used eternal black hole physical black holes formed by gravitational collapse paper treat nearly extreme black holes formed by gravitational collapse use collapse of charged thin shell consider free fall observer falls into black hole calculate time for to reach singularity methods results in section 2 conclusions in section 3 charged nonrotating black hole described by reissner - nordstrom metric @xmath0 quantity @xmath1 given by @xmath2 are mass and charge quantity @xmath1 vanishes at outer and inner horizons at @xmath5 and @xmath6 @xmath7 coordinate system becomes singular at horizons to gravitational collapse and black hole formation need different coordinate systemuse eddington - finkelstein coordinates ( @xmath8 ) @xmath9 given by @xmath10 reissner - nordstrom metric becomes @xmath11 coordinate @xmath9 constant along ingoing light rays define analogous coordinate @xmath12 constant along outgoing light rays coordinate patches cover extended reissner - nordstrom spacetime shown in fig . too large to represent gravitational collapse charged spherical object collapses only spacetime outside object described by reissner - nordstrom metric describe gravitational collapse find path of outer surface collapsing object cut out parts diagram outside replace with for interior small perturbations reissner - nordstrom blow up as @xmath13 null surface at @xmath14 ) diagram replace null surface with null singularity cut out portions diagram obtains restricted portion of extended reissner - nordstrom spacetime covered by single coordinate patch in eqn . ( ) outer and inner horizons represented by solid lines at 45 degree angles to vertical timelike singularity by dashed line simple model for gravitational collapse form black hole choose thin shell of charged dust shells described israel formalism@xcite history shell timelike hypersurface @xmath15 separating spacetimes @xmath16 @xmath17 exterior interior shell intrinsic metric @xmath18 continuous extrinsic curvature @xmath19 discontinuous satisfies @xmath20 = - 8 \pi\left @xmath21 delta function stress - energy shell quantity @xmath22 @xmath23= \phi _ + -{ _ -}$ quantity @xmath24 is @xmath22 @xmath15 evaluated @xmath16 side @xmath25 worldsheet shell by @xmath26 @xmath27 proper time observer shell stress - energy dust shell @xmath28 @xmath29 four - velocity shell @xmath30 s mass per unit area de la cruz israel@xcite kuchar@xcite chase@xcite eqn.([israelshell equation of motion shell exterior shell reissner - nordstrom spacetime spherical symmetry implies extrinsic curvature form @xmath31 eqnsisraelshell shellstress kdecomp yields @xmath32 = - 4 \pi \sigma @xmath33 = - 4 \pi \sigma{cjump calculation using eqn.([rnef shows quantities @xmath34 @xmath35 given by @xmath36 overdot denotes derivative @xmath37 interior shell minkowski spacetime expressions for @xmath34 @xmath35 by eqns beqn ceqn @xmath1 replaced by @xmath38 applying eqn ceqn to eqn cjump yields @xmath39 eqns bjump beqn motion1 yields @xmath40 constant @xmath41 @xmath42 result motion1 @xmath43 yields @xmath44 path thin shell reissner - nordstrom spacetime nonsingular horizons by solid lines null singularity dashed line start shell large radius speed @xmath45 inward direction eqn motion2 @xmath46 quantity @xmath47 defined by @xmath48 extremal black holes @xmath49 expressing eqn .motion2 ] ) @xmath50 and @xmath45 obtain @xmath51{motion3 have @xmath52 @xmath53 slightly less than @xmath54 shell cross @xmath53 short time after crossing @xmath54 perturbed black hole becomes singular at @xmath53 eddington - finkelstein coordinates essential collapse process two null surfaces at @xmath14 outgoing null surface @xmath9 finite not singular ingoing null surface @xmath13 singular which surfaces shell cross first ? function @xmath55 worldsheet shell @xmath56 . eqn rnef @xmath57 @xmath58 null coordinate @xmath9 increases towards future sign plus obtain @xmath59 if @xmath60 @xmath1 vanishes @xmath61 remains finite if @xmath62 @xmath1 vanishes @xmath63 shell starts ingoing can not change direction between two horizons @xmath64 timelike coordinate shell first crosses @xmath53 @xmath9 remains finite spacetime remains nonsingular after crossing @xmath65 shell reaches minimum radius @xmath66 re - expands eqn motion3 ] @xmath67 neglected terms higher than zeroth order in @xmath47 after reaching @xmath66 shell re - expands reaches @xmath53 shell approaches @xmath53 with @xmath68 @xmath9 diverges as @xmath69 shell approaches null singularity path shell in penrose diagram reissner - nordstrom spacetime shown in fig . fig2 shell takes time to encounter singularity true observer falls into black hole after forms different for observer falls late times observer @xmath70 outer horizon crossed @xmath9 increases along future timelike curves follows @xmath70 observer encounters shell consider behavior of shell at large @xmath9 @xmath13 have @xmath69 and @xmath71 need to know rapidly @xmath71 at large @xmath9 eqn follows shell @xmath72 eqns neglecting terms higher order in small quantities @xmath1 and @xmath47 shell at large @xmath9 have @xmath73 solution of equation is @xmath74 @xmath75 is constant two separate regimes equation simplifies for @xmath76 have @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79consider fate free - fall observer into black hole late times shell has four - velocity @xmath80 denote four - velocity observer by @xmath81 due time translation symmetry reissner - nordstrom spacetime observer has conserved energy per unit mass @xmath82 given by @xmath83 @xmath84 unit timelike vector reasoning eqn yields @xmath85 find @xmath86 at late times shell at @xmath53 region between @xmath54 and @xmath53 @xmath87 observer crosses shell proper time @xmath88 after crossing outer horizon find proper time observer to encounter singularity find behavior observer in interior shell calculate quantity @xmath89 when crosses shell from find @xmath90 using obtain @xmath91 observer crosses shell @xmath68 and @xmath92 lowest order in @xmath47 @xmath93 eqn obtain @xmath94 path of geodesic observer thin curve spacetime formed by collapse thin shell nonsingular horizons denoted by solid lines null singularity by dashed line @xmath1 small when crosses shell @xmath89 large there@xmath84 satisfies geodesic equation christoffel symbols in thin shell spacetimes have jumps delta functions @xmath84 continuous across shell thin shell formalism requires metric and @xmath29 continuous across shell entering interior shell @xmath89 given by expression eqn interior shell is minkowski spacetime shell has @xmath95 rest frame center shell observer ingoing geodesic with @xmath96 large @xmath97 factor observer must travel distance of @xmath98 to encounter singularity takes proper time of @xmath99 @xmath1 given by eqn small proper time motion observer shown in fig . calculations agree with conclusion of @xcite for nearly extremal black hole gravitational collapse observer crossing event horizon late times encounters curvature singularity statement involves two small numbers @xmath47 close to extremality black hole @xmath100 late observer crosses black hole event horizon @xmath101 is value of @xmath9 observer crosses horizon proper time from event horizon to shell is @xmath102 @xmath103 time from shell to singularity @xmath104 @xmath105 time shell to singularity negligible consider effect nature singularity result assumed singularity null black holes form singularity starts null near horizon becomes spacelike inside black hole change time observer to encounter singularity conclusion observer encounters singularity after crossing event horizon remains true collapsing thin shell model for formation charged black hole gravitational collapse consider other models collapse of charged scalar field features shell model thank ratin akhoury ryo saotome eric poisson gary horowitz don marolf for discussions work supported by nsf grant phy-0855532 oakland university poisson e israel w 1990 _ phys . rev . _ * d41 * 1796 | 0.572391 | 3,645 | 1,925 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,913 | the minimal nearest - neighbor tight - binding model with the peierls substitution is employed to describe the electronic structure of bernal - stacked graphite subject to tilted magnetic fields .
we show that while the presence of the in - plane component of the magnetic field has a negligible effect on the landau level structure at the k point of the graphite brillouin zone , at the h point it leads to the experimentally observable splitting of landau levels which grows approximately linearly with the in - plane field intensity .
address = institute of physics , academy of science of the czech republic , v. v. i. , + cukrovarnick 10 , 162 53 praha 6 , czech republic | recently , graphene monolayers have attracted much attention motivated by their unusual twodimensional ( 2d ) dirac energy spectrum of electrons . in graphite , which is a graphene multilayer composed of weakly coupled graphene sheets , the interlayer interaction converts the 2d electron energy spectrum of graphen into the three - dimensional ( 3d ) spectrum of graphite .
the application of the tilted magnetic field is a typical method to distinguish between 2d and 3d electron systems , as in 3d systems the orbital effect of the in - plane magnetic field should be observable .
this problem has been touched in two recent theoretical studies of the graphene multilayer energy spectrum in magnetic fields parallel to the layers @xcite , and of the landau levels ( lls ) of bilayer graphene in magnetic fields of arbitrary orientation @xcite .
both papers conclude that the very strong in - plane field components are necessary to induce observable effects on the electronic structure . here
we show that at the h point of the hexagonal brillouin zone of graphite the application of the tilted magnetic field leads to experimentally observable splitting of lls .
bulk graphite is composed of periodically repeated graphene bilayers formed by two nonequivalent bernal - stacked graphene sheets .
there are two sublattices , a and b , on each sheet and , therefore , four atoms in a unit cell .
the distance between the nearest atoms a and b in a single layer is @xmath0 , the interlayer distance between nearest atoms a is @xmath1 . to describe the graphite band structure
, we employ the minimal nearest - neighbor tight - binding model introduced in ref .
@xcite and successfully applied in refs .
the wave functions are expressed via four orthogonal components @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , which are , in zero magnetic field , bloch sums of atomic wave functions over the lattice sites of sublattices a and b in individual layers .
the tight - binding hamiltonian @xmath6 includes only the intralayer interaction @xmath7 between nearest atoms a and b in the plane , and the interlayer interaction @xmath8 between nearest atoms a out of plane .
the continuum approximation is used in the vicinity of the @xmath9 axis of the graphite brillouin zone , for small @xmath10 measured from the axis . then the electron wavelength is larger than the distance between atoms , and the non - zero matrix elements of @xmath6 can be written as @xmath11 the fermi velocity , @xmath12 , is defined by @xmath13 and will be used as an intralayer parameter instead of @xmath14 in the subsequent consideration .
when solving the schrdinger equation for the above four wave functions , we can make use of the structure of @xmath6 , which allows to express the function @xmath18 via the function @xmath19 from the same layer , and leaves us with two , , interlayer
equations for @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
note , that graphite is no longer periodic in the @xmath21-direction ( parallel to the @xmath22-axis ) but becomes periodic in the direction of the tilted magnetic field .
here we apply an approach developed in @xcite .
the new periodicity implies that @xmath23 can be written as @xmath24 @xmath25 . here
@xmath26 and @xmath27 can be associated with cyclotron orbits in two layers .
the dimensionless variable @xmath28 is defined by @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the cyclotron orbit center , @xmath31 , and @xmath32 is the magnetic length , @xmath33 .
the small parameter @xmath34 means the shift of the cyclotron orbit center in the @xmath35-layer due to the in - plane component of the magnetic field , @xmath36 . introducing the shift operator by @xmath37 and employing @xmath38-representation , two ,
, interlayer equations can be given the form @xmath39 \phi_2^a+ 2 t\ , e\cos{(\kappa\eta_d+k_zd ) } \phi_1^a= 0 , \label{eq1tt } \\ \label{main - eq2 } \left[\frac{\mathcal{b}}{2}\left(-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\kappa^2 } + \kappa^2 -1\right)-e^2\right ] \phi_1^a+ 2 t\ , e\cos{(\kappa\eta_d+k_zd ) } \phi_2^a = 0,\label{eq2tt } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath40 stands for @xmath41 .
( [ main - eq1],[main - eq2 ] ) represent the main result of this work .
it is evident that @xmath42 and @xmath43 can not be too far from the eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator , @xmath44 .
if we write @xmath45 we arrive to @xmath46 a_{2,n}+ 2 e \sum_{n'=0}^{\infty}t_{n , n'}a_{1,n'}=0,\label{eq1p } \\
\left[\mathcal{b}n - e^2\right ] a_{1,n}+ 2 e \sum_{n'=0}^{\infty}t_{n , n'}a_{2,n'}=0,\label{eq2p}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath47 in the perpendicular magnetic field @xmath48 and @xmath49 .
this corresponds to the previously discussed case @xcite . at the @xmath50 point ,
@xmath51 , we get the energy spectrum of an effective bilayer . at the @xmath52 point ,
@xmath53 , the coupling between layers disappears , and we obtain the lls corresponding to graphene dirac fermions , namely @xmath54 for the first layer , and @xmath55 for the second layer , @xmath56 .
let us discuss the magnetic field of an arbitrary direction .
it is obvious that the influence of the small parameter @xmath57 is negligible at the point k when @xmath51 and @xmath58 .
this case corresponds to the bilayer subject to the tilted field discussed in ref .
@xcite , with the result that corrections induced by @xmath36 are negligible .
let us consider the influence of @xmath36 at the h point , when @xmath59 and @xmath60 . then , unlike the case of the perpendicular field , the interlayer interaction is not reduced to zero , but remains finite .
note , that the small perturbation @xmath57 couples the unperturbed states @xmath61 and @xmath62 , which belong to the same unperturbed eigenvalues @xmath63 .
consequently , the perturbation approach suitable to describe the coupling of these degenerated states must be applied , which yields equations @xmath64 a_{2,n}+2 e t_{n , n+1 } a_{1,n+1}=0,\label{eq1pp } \\
\label{eq2 } \left[\mathcal{b}(n+1)-e^2\right ] a_{1,n+1}+2 e t_{n+1,n}a_{2,n}=0,\label{eq2pp}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath65.\ ] ] the secular equation derived from eqs.([eq1],[eq2 ] ) reads @xmath66 ^2 - 4 e^2 t^2_{n , n+1}=0,\ ] ] and from here we get the four eigenenergies @xmath67 the eigenenergies , @xmath68 and @xmath69 , originated from @xmath70 remain the same as in the perpendicular magnetic field . in that case
the degeneracy is not removed .
the authors benefited from discussions with milan orlita .
the support of the european science foundation epigrat project ( gra/10/e006 ) , av cr research program avoz10100521 and the ministry of education of the czech republic project lc510 is acknowledged . | graphene monolayers attention twodimensional energy spectrum in graphite multilayer interlayer interaction converts 2d electron energy spectrum into three - dimensional 3d spectrum tilted magnetic field 2d and 3d electron systems orbital effect in - plane magnetic field observable problem touched in studies multilayer energy spectrum in magnetic fields landau levels bilayer graphene in fields arbitrary orientation strong in - plane field components necessary effects on electronic structure at h point hexagonal brillouin zone graphite tilted magnetic field leads to observable splitting of lls bulk graphite repeated graphene bilayers two nonequivalent bernal - stacked graphene sheets two sublattices a and b on each sheet four atoms in unit cell distance between nearest atoms a and b is @xmath0 interlayer distance @xmath1 graphite band structure minimal nearest - neighbor tight - binding model in ref @xcite applied in .wave functions expressed via four components zero magnetic field atomic wave functions over lattice sites sublattices a b layers tight - binding hamiltonian @xmath6 includes intralayer interaction between atoms a b interlayer atoms out plane continuum approximation used @xmath9 axis brillouin zone for small @xmath10 electron wavelength larger than distance between atoms non - zero matrix elements @xmath6 written as @xmath11 fermi velocity @xmath12 defined by @xmath13 used intralayer parameter instead @xmath14 solving schrdinger equation for four wave functions structure of @xmath6 function @xmath18 via @xmath19 layer two interlayer equations for @xmath19 @xmath20 graphite no periodic in @xmath21-direction becomes periodic tilted magnetic field approach in @xcite new periodicity @xmath23 written as @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 associated with cyclotron orbits in two layersdimensionless variable @xmath28 defined by @xmath29 @xmath30 cyclotron orbit center @xmath32 magnetic length small parameter @xmath34 means shift cyclotron orbit center in @xmath35-layer due to in - plane magnetic field shift operator by @xmath37 @xmath38-representation two interlayer equations form @xmath39 \phi_2^a+ 2 t\^a= 0{eq1tt - eq2 }^2^2\phi_1^a+ 2 t\\phi_2^a = 0{eq2tt }{aligned @xmath40 stands for @xmath41 main - eq1] - eq2 represent main result of work @xmath42 and @xmath43 from eigenfunctions of harmonic oscillator @xmath44 write @xmath45 arrive @xmath46 a_{2,n}+ 2 e\sum{n'=0}{n{1,n'}=0\label{eq1p\mathcal{b}n - e^2\right a_{1,n}+ 2 e\sum{n'=0}{n_{2,n'}=0\label{eq2p}{aligned @xmath47 perpendicular magnetic field @xmath48 @xmath49 corresponds case @xcite @xmath50 @xmath51 energy spectrum effective bilayer @xmath52 @xmath53 coupling layers disappears obtain lls graphene dirac fermions @xmath54 first layer @xmath55 second layer @xmath56 discuss magnetic field arbitrary direction influence small parameter @xmath57 negligible point k @xmath51 @xmath58 corresponds bilayer tilted field corrections @xmath36 negligible consider influence @xmath36 h point @xmath59 @xmath60 interlayer interaction not zero remains finite small perturbation @xmath57 couples unperturbed states @xmath61 @xmath62 same unperturbed eigenvalues @xmath63perturbation approach degenerated states yields equations @xmath64 a_{2,n}+2 t_{n n+1{1,n+1}=0{eq1pp{eq2{b}(n+1)-e^2 a_{1,n+1}+2 t{n+1,n{2,n}=0{eq2pp @xmath65 secular equation[eq1][eq2 reads @xmath66 ^2 - 4 e^2 t^2_{n , n+1}=0 four eigenenergies @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 same perpendicular magnetic field degeneracy not removed authors benefited discussions milan orlita support european science foundation project cr research program ministry education czech republic project lc510 acknowledged | 0.309129 | 1,784 | 947 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,920 | we investigate minimal surfaces passing a given curve in @xmath0@xmath1 . using the frenet frame of a given curve and isothermal parameter
, we derive the necessary and sufficient condition for minimal surface .
also we derive the parametric representation of two minimal surface families passing a circle and a helix as examples . | a surface is called minimal if its mean curvature vanishes everywhere carmo.minimal surfaces are among the most important objects studied in differential geometry .
the theory of minimal surfaces in euclidean spaces @xmath2 has its roots in the calculus of variations developed by euler and lagrange in the 18-th century and in later investigations by enneper , scherk , schwarz , riemann and weierstrass in the 19-th century . during the years
, many great mathematicians have contributed to this theory .
early , two problems were posed from the belgian physicist plateau and from the swedish mathematician bjrling in the 19-th century for minimal surfaces passing a curve .
plateau set the problem as find a minimal surface @xmath3 having a curve @xmath4 as boundary. this problem was a natural outgrowth of his physical experiments on soap films .
plateau s problem was first solved by douglas and rado .
bjrling considered is to find the minimal surface passing through a given non - closed analytic curve @xmath4 , with given tangent planes along @xmath4 .
the problem was inquired and solved by bjrling .
a solution of this problem always exists and is unique.this solution of bjrling s problem always applicable one to find the minimal surface whenever one of its geodesic lines or one of its asymptotic lines or one of its lines of curvature is known .
one can obtain and detailed description of minimal surfaces , plateau s and bjrling s problems from @xcite and oprea recently , parametric representation of a surface family passing a given geodesic curve was studied in @xcite which using the ferenet frame of a given curve . in like manner ,
@xciteand bayram et al.@xcite studied the necessary and sufficient condition for line of curvature and asymptotic curve , respectively .
li et al . approximation studied the approximation minimal surface with geodesics by using dirichlet function . in this paper , without limitation for curve such that it becomes geodesic lines or asymptotic lines or lines of curvature on minimal surface
, we investigate the parametric representation of minimal surface family passing a given curve .
we utilize the frenet frame of given curve and isothermal parameter on minimal surface .
we derive the necessary and sufficient condition for a surface which satisfying both passing a given curve and becomes minimal .
in section two , we give definitions of isothermal parameter of a surface and frenet frame of a curve . in section three
, we derive the necessary and sufficient condition for minimal surface . in section four and five
, we present parametric representations of minimal surface families passing a given circle and a helix , respectively .
we have following tools for minimal surfaces and curves .
@xcitelet @xmath5 be a reguler surface where @xmath6 @xmath2and @xmath7 @xmath2 .
a parametrization @xmath5 is called isothermal if @xmath8 we utilize isothermal parameters for parameterization of minimal surfaces .
this requirement is not restriction because of the following lemma .
@xciteisothermal parameters exist on any minimal surface in @xmath2 .
the mean curvature of a surface can be calculated by @xmath9 where @xmath10 @xmath11 and @xmath12 is unit normal of the surface defined by @xmath13if we apply isothermal conditions on [ mean ] then we have the following corollary .
@xcitelet @xmath14 is isothermal .
then @xmath14 is minimal if and only if its coordinate functions are harmonic i.e. @xmath15 let @xmath16 be an arclenght parametrized curve that is @xmath17 .
we assume that @xmath18 for some @xmath19 , otherwise the curve @xmath20 corresponds to a straight lines.the frenet frame of a regular curve @xmath20 is defined @xmath21 where @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , are called unit tangent , unit normal and binormal of @xmath20 , respectively .
the derivatives of the franet frame are given by @xmath25 where @xmath26 and @xmath27 are the curvature and torsion of the curve @xmath20 , respectively . by utilizing the frenet frame ,
wang et al.@xcite , construct a surface pencil that posseses @xmath20 as a common geodesic .
they gave parametric representation of surface as @xmath28 where @xmath29 are smooth functions with @xmath30 the unit normal of the surface is @xmath31where @xmath32 they derived the following identities for the necessary and sufficient condition for the curve @xmath20 as a geodesic on the surface @xmath14 .
@xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 in @xcite , bayram et al . derived the necessary and sufficient condition for the curve @xmath20 as an asymptotic line on the surface @xmath36
we express minimal surfaces with this parametric representation .
in this section , we derive necessary and sufficient condition for minimal surface family passing the curve @xmath16 .
if we calculate the partial derivatives of @xmath5 then we have , @xmath38 from [ isothermal ] and [ harmonic ] we have following corollaries .
if the surface @xmath14 is isothermal then @xmath39 if the surface @xmath14 is harmonic then@xmath40 if we consider the surface satisfy the isothermal and harmonic conditions together then we have the following theorem .
let @xmath16 is be an arclenght parameterized curve .
the surface [ surpen ] is minimal surface passing the curve @xmath20 if and only if there exist the smooth functions @xmath29
satisfying,@xmath41@xmath42 if the conditon [ isopara ] is satisfied then @xmath43let the surface @xmath44 is be minimal surface . from lemma 1 and corollary 1 there
exist isothermal parameters and the surface @xmath14 is harmonic .
thus , there exist the smooth functions @xmath29 satisfying the conditions [ isot]-[har3 ] . on the other hand , if there exist the smooth functions @xmath45 satisfying the conditions [ isot]-[har3 ] then the surface @xmath44 is isothermal and harmonic .
thus the surface @xmath44 is minimal .
in this section , we investigate a minimal surface family passing a circle . let the curve @xmath16 is be a circle,@xmath46the curvature and torsion of the circle @xmath20 are become @xmath47 if we choose @xmath48 , @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 then from [ isot]-[har3 ] we have @xmath52 from [ c5 ] @xmath53from [ c3 ] and
[ c4]@xmath54@xmath55from [ c1 ] and [ c2 ] @xmath56@xmath57@xmath58where @xmath59 $ ] .
the frenet frame of the circle @xmath20 is @xmath60 consequently , we derive the minimal surface family passing the circle @xmath20 as @xmath61 its obvious that each members of this minimal surface family is a surface of revolution .
we know that only surface of revolution whic is minimal is a piece of catenoid or a plane .
thus each member of this family is a piece of catenoid or a plane . for @xmath62 ,
the circle @xmath20 is a geodesic on the surface @xmath63 for @xmath62 , [ geo1 ] and [ geo2 ] are satisfied .
thus , the circle @xmath20 is a geodesic on the surface @xmath64 .
we show that some members of minimal surface family in figure [ fig : figure1]- [ fig : figure4 ] for @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 and @xmath68 , @xmath69 .
+ and minimal surface @xmath70 and minimal surface @xmath71 and minimal surface @xmath72 ]
in this section , we investigate a minimal surface family passing a helix . let the curve @xmath73 is be a helix,@xmath74the curvature and torsion of the circle @xmath20 are become @xmath75 if we choose @xmath48 , @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 then from [ isot]-[har3 ] we have @xmath76 from [ h3 ] and [ h5 ] @xmath77 @xmath78thus,@xmath79@xmath80from [ h4 ] @xmath81where @xmath82 . from [ h1 ] and
[ h2]@xmath83@xmath84@xmath85 the frenet frame of the helix @xmath86 is @xmath87 consequently , we derive minimal surface family passing the helix @xmath86 as @xmath88where @xmath89 . for @xmath90 ,
the helix @xmath86 is a geodesic on the surface @xmath91 for @xmath92 , the helix @xmath86 is an asymptotic line on the surface @xmath93 for @xmath92 , [ asymp ] is satisfied .
thus , the helix @xmath86 is a asymptotic line on the surface @xmath94 .
we show that some members of minimal surface family in figure [ fig : figure5 ] - [ fig : figure8 ] for @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 and @xmath98 , @xmath99 . and minimal surface @xmath100 and minimal surface @xmath101 and minimal surface @xmath102 .
we derive necessary and sufficient condition for minimal surface passing a given curve . also , we present parametric representation of minimal surface families passing a circle and a helix . | surface minimal if curvature vanishes surfaces important in differential geometry theory of minimal surfaces in euclidean spaces roots in calculus variations euler lagrange 18-th later enneper scherk schwarz riemann weierstrass 19-th century mathematicians contributed theory two problems from belgian physicist plateau swedish mathematician bjrling for minimal surfaces passing curve plateau find minimal surface @xmath3 curve @xmath4 boundary physical experiments on soap films problem solved by douglas rado bjrling find minimal surface passing through non - closed analytic curve @xmath4 tangent planes solved by bjrling solution unique find minimal surface whenever geodesic lines asymptotic lines lines curvature known detailed description of minimal surfaces problems from @xcite oprea parametric representation of surface family passing geodesic curve studied in @xcite ferenet frame curve @xciteand bayram et al. studied necessary sufficient condition for line of curvature asymptotic curve li et al. approximation studied minimal surface with geodesics dirichlet functionpaper limitation curve minimal surface investigate parametric representation minimal surface family passing curve utilize frenet frame curve isothermal parameter minimal surface derive necessary sufficient condition for surface satisfying passing curve minimal section two definitions isothermal parameter surface frenet frame curve section three derive condition for minimal surface section four five present parametric representations minimal surface families passing circle helix tools for minimal surfaces curves @xmath5 reguler surface @xmath6 @xmath7 parametrization @xmath5 isothermal @xmath8 utilize isothermal parameters parameterization minimal surfaces requirement not restriction lemma @xciteisothermal parameters exist minimal surface @xmath2 mean curvature surface calculated by @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath12 unit normal surface defined @xmath13if apply isothermal conditions mean corollary @xmath14 isothermal minimal coordinate functions harmonic @xmath15 @xmath16 arclenght parametrized curve @xmath17 assume @xmath18 @xmath19 curve @xmath20 corresponds straight linesfrenet frame regular curve @xmath20 defined @xmath21 @xmath22 unit tangent normal binormal of derivatives frame by @xmath25 @xmath26 curvature torsion of curve utilizing frenet frame wang et al. construct surface pencil @xmath20 common geodesic parametric representation surface @xmath28 @xmath29 smooth functions @xmath30 unit normal @xmath31where @xmath32 derived identities for necessary sufficient condition curve @xmath20 geodesic surface @xmath14 @xmath33 @xmath35 bayram derived condition curve @xmath20 asymptotic line surface @xmath36 express minimal surfaces with parametric representation derive necessary sufficient condition for minimal surface family passing curve @xmath16 calculate partial derivatives of @xmath5 @xmath38 isothermal harmonic ] corollaries surface @xmath14 isothermal @xmath39 harmonic@xmath40 surface isothermal harmonic conditions theorem @xmath16 arclenght parameterized curve surface surpen ] minimal surface passing curve @xmath20 if smooth functions @xmath29 satisfying conditon isopara satisfied surface @xmath44 minimal surfacelemma 1 corollary 1 isothermal parameters surface @xmath14 harmonic smooth functions @xmath29 conditions [ isot]-[har3 ] smooth functions @xmath45 isot]-[har3 surface @xmath44 isothermal harmonic minimal investigate minimal surface family passing circle curve @xmath16 circle@xmath46the curvature torsion circle @xmath20 @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 isot]-[har3 ] @xmath52 [ c5 ] @xmath53from [ c3 ] [ c4]@xmath54@xmath55from [ c1 ] [ c2 ] @xmath56@xmath57@xmath58where @xmath59 frenet frame circle @xmath20 @xmath60 minimal surface family passing circle @xmath20 @xmath61 each surface revolution revolution minimal piece catenoid plane @xmath62 circle @xmath20 geodesic surface @xmath63 @xmath62 [ geo1 ] [ geo2 ] satisfied circle @xmath20 geodesic surface @xmath64 members minimal surface family figure- @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69minimal surface @xmath70 investigate family passing helix curve @xmath73 helix curvature torsion circle @xmath20 @xmath75 @xmath48 @xmath51 @xmath76 h3 h5 ] @xmath77@xmath79@xmath80from h4 @xmath82 h1 h2]@xmath83@xmath84@xmath85 frenet frame helix @xmath86 @xmath87 derive minimal surface family passing helix @xmath86 @xmath88where @xmath89 @xmath90 helix @xmath86 geodesic surface @xmath91 @xmath92 helix @xmath86 asymptotic line surface @xmath93 @xmath92 asymp ] satisfied helix @xmath86 asymptotic line surface @xmath94 members minimal surface family figure - @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 surface @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 derive necessary sufficient condition minimal surface passing curve present parametric representation minimal surface families passing circle helix | 0.317569 | 2,178 | 1,142 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,921 | several angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy ( arpes ) studies reveal a poorly nested fermi surface of lifeas , far away from a spin density wave instability , and clear - cut superconducting gap anisotropies . on the other hand a very different
, more nested fermi surface and dissimilar gap anisotropies have been obtained from quasiparticle interference ( qpi ) data , which were interpreted as arising from _ intraband _ scattering within hole - like bands . here
we show that this arpes - qpi paradox is completely resolved by _ interband _ scattering between the hole - like bands .
the resolution follows from an excellent agreement between experimental quasiparticle scattering data and @xmath0-matrix qpi calculations ( based on experimental band structure data ) , which allows disentangling interband and intraband scattering processes .
the band structure of the iron - based superconductor lifeas became recently a matter of strong controversial interest @xcite since its precise knowledge is crucial for an understanding of the unusual superconductivity of lifeas .
iron - arsenides have the well - known property that experimentally observed factors such as fermi surface ( fs ) nesting and van - hove singularity - like behavior have a decisive impact on the type of spin fluctuations and on the superconducting ground state : a poorly nested model band structure of lifeas which mimics essential findings from angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy ( arpes ) experiments yields prevailing ferromagnetic fluctuations with an instability towards triplet superconductivity @xcite , whereas a calculated electronic band structure with a stronger nesting has been shown to result in an @xmath1-wave superconducting ground state driven by antiferromagnetic fluctuations @xcite . several arpes studies on lifeas indeed consistently reveal a quite poor nesting , an ( almost ) van hove singularity for one hole - like band at the fermi level , and clear - cut momentum dependencies of the superconducting gap @xmath2 for each band @xmath3 @xcite . a much different normal state band structure which corresponds to a stronger nesting and other superconducting gap anisotropies @xmath2 have , however , recently been deduced from a spectroscopic imaging scanning tunneling microscopy ( si - stm ) study of the quasiparticle interference ( qpi ) of lifeas @xcite .
this finding is based on the central assumption that quasiparticles inducing the qpi are scattered only internally within separate hole - like bands . in this letter , we show that this seeming arpes - qpi paradox is completely resolved when _ interband _ scattering is taken into account .
to be specific , we compare the experimentally observed qpi pattern at small wave vectors @xmath4 with qpi calculations which _ i ) _ are based on experimental band structure data and _ ii ) _ allow to consider individual scattering processes separately .
we find an excellent agreement between the experimental and calculated data when the mentioned interband scattering is taken into account , whereas _ intraband _ scattering alone ( the essential hypothesis in ref . )
fails to yield such an agreement .
this explains the observed qpi s of ref . and that of another qpi study of lifeas
@xcite without having to resort to low - energy band structure models that are contradicting arpes experiments .
lifeas is a _
stoichiometric _ superconductor , i.e. superconductivity emerges already without doping , at a relatively high critical temperature @xmath5 k @xcite .
already this renders it radically different from the canonical 1111 and 122 iron - arsenide superconductors , where strong nesting between hole - like and electron - like fs pockets causes an antiferromagnetic spin density wave ( sdw ) ground state in the undoped parent compounds .
there , superconductivity emerges only if the sdw state is weakened e.g. by doping @xcite , and nesting - related antiferromagnetic fluctuations have been suggested to drive the superconductivity with an @xmath1-wave order parameter @xcite .
lifeas , however , appears to be far away from an sdw instability : all doping attempts lead to a decrease of @xmath6 @xcite , and according to the arpes studies @xcite , the fs of lifeas consists of two similarly sized electron - like fs sheets around the @xmath7-point , and two hole - like fs sheets around the @xmath8-point arising from hole - like bands ( labelled @xmath9 and @xmath10 , see fig .
[ fs_schem ] ) .
one of the two bands has a relatively large fs ( @xmath10-band , @xmath11 ) , whereas the other is very small ( @xmath12 ) such that the corresponding @xmath9-band just touches the fermi level yielding a structure close to a van - hove singularity .
due to the lack of surface states @xcite these findings and those from si - stm are expected to be bulk representative , and in fact the arpes electronic structure has been shown to be well consistent with bulk sensitive hall effect results @xcite . in their qpi study @xcite , allan et al . used the extracted scattering vectors of the qpi to construct three hole - band dispersions along high - symmetry directions , where they assumed the observed scattering vectors to stem from intraband scattering .
one of the resulting bands ( labeled @xmath13 in ref . ) is consistent with the @xmath10-band observed in arpes @xcite , and another ( @xmath14 ) matches quite well the @xmath9-band ( see fig .
[ fs_schem ] ) .
however , the third of the suggested bands ( @xmath15 ) lacks such a correspondence since its fermi wave vector @xmath16 @xcite neither matches that of the large nor the small hole - like fs observed in arpes ( see fig .
[ fs_schem ] ) .
its length is , however much closer to that of the electron - like bands and thus is the one which would result in a stronger nesting . and @xmath13 as obtained from qpi by allan et al .
@xcite .
note that allan et al .
extract the fermi wave vectors along high - symmetry directions and that the shown fs sheets are respective isotropic two - dimensional extrapolations .
the shown unfolded brillouin zone ( bz ) refers to the one - fe unit cell .
the bz related to the two - fe unit cell is indicated by dotted lines .
b ) lifeas band structure at negative energies .
circles represent the extracted quasiparticle dispersions @xmath17 of the hole - like bands @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath13 obtained in ref . , where @xmath18 is given by half of the length of the observed scattering vectors @xmath19 .
grey shaded contours represent @xmath9 and @xmath10 bands as observed by arpes @xcite .
the extended width of the @xmath9 band indicates @xmath20 dependence obtained from different photon energies @xcite . the indicated dispersion shown as a dashed line corresponds to data obtained at a photon energy @xmath21 ev . ] as is evident in refs . and ,
a prominent feature of the fourier transformed experimental qpi pattern at negative bias is a bright squarish contour at small @xmath22 .
fig .
[ exp_schem](a ) shows our si - stm data at @xmath23 mev , which we have obtained on high - quality superconducting lifeas single crystals @xcite in a home - built scanning tunneling microscope at @xmath24 k ( see ref . for details of the measurement and the full topographic and spectroscopic data set ) .
the chosen energy value is significantly larger ( @xmath25 mev ) than the superconducting gap value @xcite .
thus gap anisotropies do not play a strong role in the qpi pattern .
the observed square structure can be straightforwardly understood by considering backscattering between the small ( @xmath9 ) and the large ( @xmath10 ) hole band @xcite : due to the high dos of the @xmath9-band and the relatively small momentum spread of this band at a given energy close to the band - top ( see fig . [ fs_schem](b ) ) , the corresponding scattering vectors ( labeled @xmath26 ) just map the constant energy contour ( cec ) of the @xmath10-band ( cf . fig . [ exp_schem](b ) ) . in order to underpin this statement
, we show in fig .
[ fs_schem](b ) that the diagonal @xmath27 with @xmath28 @xcite with a length @xmath29 ( with @xmath30 the shortest fe - fe distance , and @xmath31 the in - plane lattice constant @xcite ) just connects states in the @xmath9 and @xmath10 bands along the @xmath32 direction as observed at this energy by arpes @xcite .
ref . reports a similar squarish structure , the size of which along the @xmath32 direction allan et al . used to extract the @xmath15-dispersion .
in fact , we find that the diagonal @xmath26 perfectly matches the reported @xmath33 at @xmath34 @xcite .
this shows unambiguously that _
i ) _ the present and the reported qpi patterns of allan et al . are geometrically well consistent , and _
ii ) _ as a consequence , the suggested @xmath15-band by allan et al . does not describe a quasiparticle dispersion but has to be reinterpreted as the dispersion of the scattering wave vectors @xmath26 which connect the @xmath9 and @xmath10 hole - like bands .
mev @xcite .
b ) simplified constant energy contours ( cec ) of the hole - like @xmath9 and @xmath10 bands at @xmath23 mev .
@xmath26 represents interband scattering processes which connect states on both bands .
it has the same length as @xmath35 ( i.e. , the diameter of the dashed @xmath15-cec ) reported in ref . .
@xmath36 represents intraband scattering within the @xmath10 band .
[ exp_schem ] ] having established this most important finding we corroborate it further by qpi simulations which we use to analyze the influence of the individual possible scattering processes separately .
the calculation of the qpi intensity distribution arising from the local density of states ( ldos ) is based on a standard @xmath0-matrix approach .
thereby the underlying electronic band structure of lifeas is modeled by a tight - binding approximation of the arpes results of refs . and .
from the latter work we have derived an appropriate model for the superconducting gap function @xmath37 which is able to model the measured momentum dependence of the superconducting gap along the fermi surface of the hole pockets @xmath9 and @xmath10 of fig . [ fs_schem](a ) .
the model describes anisotropic @xmath38-wave pairing where the gap value along @xmath10 varies between @xmath39 mev and @xmath40 mev being minimal at the direction towards the electron - like fs .
the gap along @xmath9 is almost isotropic with a value of approximately @xmath41 mev .
-matrix approach applied to a tight - binding model of the arpes results @xcite and anisotropic @xmath38-wave pairing ( see text ) .
a ) only intraband scattering within the small hole - like band @xmath9 and the large hole - like band @xmath10 is considered .
all scattering processes between @xmath9 and @xmath10 and those processes involving the electron bands are suppressed in the calculation .
b ) only interband scattering between @xmath9 and @xmath10 is considered .
c ) contributions displayed in panels a ) and b ) are summed up in order to enable the comparison of the intensities .
the scattering vectors @xmath26 , @xmath36 ( see fig . [ exp_schem ] ) are indicated . ] for the numerical evaluation we use a square lattice of @xmath42 lattice points and periodic boundary conditions . to simplify the treatment
we assume that the isotropic scattering potential acts locally without coupling to the spin of conduction electrons ( potential scattering ) .
furthermore , the cleanliness of the sample used for the stm measurements @xcite allows us to neglect multiple scattering processes ( born approximation ) .
fig .
[ theo ] shows calculated qpi patterns for bias voltage @xmath23 mev . in order to identify the origin of the different features in the measured intensity distribution displayed in fig .
[ exp_schem](a ) we faded out specific scattering processes such that only intraband scattering within the two hole pockets @xmath9 and @xmath10 ( panel ( a ) ) and only interband scattering between @xmath9 and @xmath10 ( panel ( b ) ) entered the calculation separately . in panel ( c ) the intensities of both scattering types are summed up . as it is found already from geometrical interpretation of the experimental result
our numerical simulation confirms that the bright squarish structure described by vector @xmath26 has to be assigned clearly to interband scattering .
moreover , its intensity is significantly larger than the intraband contributions which are seen as _
i ) _ a small region around the @xmath8 point indicating scattering within the small hole pocket @xmath9 and _ ii ) _ a large contour indicated by scattering vectors @xmath36 connecting momenta within the large hole fs . the comparison between fig . [ theo](c ) and
fig .
[ exp_schem](a ) shows that the size and shape of most of the qpi features can be reproduced by our numerical simulation in excellent agreement with the experimental results . beyond the bright structures we find also several features showing minor intensity .
for example , the intraband scattering within @xmath10 shows a pronounced maximum at momenta @xmath43 along the lines connecting the points @xmath44 and @xmath45 which is seen very well in the experimental result ( @xmath36 ) . on the other hand structures within the bright @xmath26-contour
appear with less intensity as they show up in the experimental result fig .
[ exp_schem](a ) . this difference might be traced back to the influence of coherence factors entering the numerical simulation .
it is well - known that a possible variation of the superconducting phase along the fermi surface strongly affects the intensity distribution of the qpi at bias energy close to the superconducting gap @xcite .
note that within our simple anisotropic @xmath38-wave order parameter model though the gap value is consistent with arpes studies a possible variation of the phase is neglected completely .
such phase effects are interesting and will be subject to a forthcoming publication . to sum up
, we have shown that the quasiparticle interference in lifeas is dominated by interband scattering between two different hole - like bands around the @xmath8 point .
this interpretation of the experimental results is supported by a comparison to a numerical simulation of the qpi based on a realistic tight - binding model that has been carefully extracted from recent arpes data . within this theoretical analysis we considered the different scattering processes separately and we obtained an excellent agreement with the experimental qpi data from refs . and .
this implies that a consistency between the results of the two experimental stm approaches and arpes is obtained when going beyond considering only intraband scattering and include interband scattering explicitly .
this changes fundamentally the interpretation of the extracted @xmath15-band and the proposed gap anisotropy @xmath46 of ref . , and explains in both cases their strong discrepancy with arpes data .
for the @xmath14 and @xmath13 bands the consistency with the arpes results and also the present qpi calculations is apparently very good .
this is compelling evidence that the band structure suggested by apres is indeed correct .
it is interesting to note , that this band structure is also well compatible with a recent de haas van alphen study @xcite , where significant fs nesting in lifeas is claimed , despite only electron - like orbits in agreement with arpes have been observed by this bulk sensitive technique so far . | the authors thank s.v .
borisenko , j.c .
davis , i. eremin , t. hanaguri , d.k .
morr , a.w .
rost for valuable discussions and comments .
furthermore , we thank s.v .
borisenko for providing band structure data of lifeas . this work has been supported by the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft through the priority programme spp1458 ( grant no . be1749/13 and gr3330/2 ) and the graduate school grk 1621 . | authors thank s borisenko davis eremin hanaguri d.k morr rost for discussions comments thank s borisenko band structure data lifeas work supported by deutsche priority programme spp1458 grant be1749/13 gr3330/2 graduate school grk 1621 | 0.066995 | 117 | 59 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,923 | the rapidity dependence of nuclear modifications factor in d - au collisions at @xmath0 = 200 gev at rhic is discussed .
address = physics department , brookhaven national laboratory | particle production at forward rapidities in p(d)-a reactions probes partons in the target at low - x values . at sufficient high energy , large rapidities or large nucleii
the initial gluon distribution will saturate , and is expected to modify the particle pseudo rapidity densities , as well as the @xmath1 spectra of hadrons .
a theory based on qcd has been developed for dense low - x systems , termed the color glass condensate ( cgc ) @xcite .
this description has inspired much theoretical and experimental work , and was also a motivation for the brahms measurements of charged hadrons at forward rapidities in 200 gev d - au collisions at rhic .
the data reported here were all obtained with the brahms spectrometers .
the brahms forward spectrometer consists of 4 dipole magnets , 5 tracking chambers , two time - of - flight systems and a ring imaging chrenkov detector ( rich ) for particle identification . the angular coverage of the spectrometer extends from 2.3@xmath2 to 15@xmath2 with solid angle of 0.8 msr .
the mid - rapidity spectrometer covers angles from 40@xmath2 and 90@xmath2 .
details of experimental setup can be found in @xcite .
the collision vertex is determined from timing measurements done with a set of symmetricaly placed scintillator counters around the beam pipe at 1.5 , 4.15 and 6.7 meters @xcite .
the resolution of the vertex determination is @xmath3 cm .
this set of counters also provides the minimum bias normalization .
it is estimated that for pp collisions they record @xmath4 of the inelastic cross section .
additional details of the setup as well as the analysis can be found in @xcite where most of the data discussed here were first published .
spectra of charged hadrons in d - au and pp collisions at 200 gev are presented in fig . 1 for several pseudorapidities
. the data at @xmath5 and 1 are for the average of the positive and negatives charges , while the high rapidity data are for negative only . both the pp and dau cross sections becomes steeper with increasing @xmath6 .
the data collected from d - au collisions is compared to p - p using the nuclear modification factor defined as : @xmath7 . where @xmath8 is the number of binary collisions estimated to be equal to @xmath9 for minimum biased d+au collisions .
the pt dependence of the factor is shown in fig.[fig : ratio ] .
each panel shows the ratio calculated at a different @xmath6 value . at mid - rapidity ( @xmath10 )
, the nuclear modification factor exceeds 1 for transverse momenta greater than 2 gev / c in a similar , although less pronounced way as cronin s p+a measurements performed at lower energies @xcite .
nuclear modification factor for charged hadrons at pseudorapidities @xmath11 .
statistical errors are shown with error bars .
systematic errors are shown with shaded boxes with widths set by the bin sizes .
the shaded band around unity indicates the estimated error on the normalization to @xmath12 .
dashed lines at @xmath13 gev / c show the normalized charged particle density ratio @xmath14 . ]
a shift of one unit of rapidity is enough to make the cronin type enhancement disappear , and as the measurements are done at higher rapidities , the ratio becomes consistently smaller than 1 indicating a suppression in dau collisions compared to scaled pp systems at the same energy .
in all four panels , the statistical errors , shown as error bars ( vertical lines ) , are dominant specially in the most forward measurements .
these results have been described within the context of the color glass condensate @xcite ; the evolution of the nuclear modification factor with rapidity and centrality is consistent with a description of the au target where the rate of gluon fusion becomes comparable with that of gluon emmission as the rapidity increases and it slows down the overall growth of the gluon density .
the measured nuclear modification factor compares the slowed down growth of the numerator to a sum of incoherent p+p collisions , considered as dilute systems , whose gluon densities grow faster with rapidity because of the abscence of gluon fusion in dilute systems @xcite .
other explanations for the measured suppression have been proposed and they also reproduce the data @xcite . some of these other explanations particluar focus on the observation that the charged particle pseudo - rapidity density distributions exhibits a change in shape vs. centrality .
this is illustrated in fig.2 by the dashed lines at low @xmath15 where the ratios where obtained from the brahms data@xcite ( shown in fig.[fig : dndeta ] ) and the ua5 pp results@xcite .
thus already the overall soft spectrum shows suppression when going to forward angles .
the nuclear modification factor @xmath16 calculated for anti - protons ( filled squares ) and negative pions ( filled triangles ) at @xmath17 .
the same ratio calcutated for negative particles is shown with filled circles , and the systematic error for that measurement is shown as grey band .
, title="fig : " ] the nuclear modification factor of baryons is different from the one calculated with mesons , whenever the factor shows the so called cronin enhancement , baryons show a stronger enhancement . such difference , seen at lower energies , has also been found at rhic energies at all rapidities , in particular , fig .
[ fig : identifiedrda ] presents the minimum bias nuclear modification @xmath16 for anti - protons and negative pions at @xmath17 .
these ratios were obtained making use of ratios of raw counts of identified particles compared to those of charged particles in each @xmath18 bin .
this nuclear modification factor was calculated from the measured ratios between anti - protons and pions to changed particles for dau and pp and applying these factors to the minimum bias nuclear modification factor for negatively charged hadrons@xcite .
no attempt was made to estimate the contributions from anti - lambda feed down to the anti - proton result .
the remarkable difference between baryons and mesons has been related to parton recombination @xcite for heavy ion reactions .
it is though surprising that this effect in the da system at forward rapidities where only a small soft parton component should be able to account for this increase . in summary ,
particle production from dau and pp collisions at @xmath19 200 gev and at different rapidities with the brahms setup offers a window to the small - x components of the au wave function .
the suppression found in the particle production at high rapidities from d+au collisions may be the first indication of the onset of saturation in the gluon distribution function of the au target .
this work is supported by the division of nuclear physics of the office of science of the u.s .
department of energy under contract de - ac02 - 98-ch10886 , the danish natural science research council , the research council of norway , the jagiellonian university grants and the romanian ministry of education and research .
i thank r.debbe for providing valuable input to this talk and conbtribution .
l.mclerran and r.venugopalan,_phys .
rev . _ * d49 * 1994 , 2233 .
j.adamczyk et.al .
meth . _ * a499 * 2003 , 437 i. arsene _ et al . _
[ brahms collaboration ] , _ phys .
lett . _ * * 9**3 , 2004 , 242303 i. arsene at.al .
letter _ , * 94 * 2005 , 032301 d. antreasyan et . al .
rev . _ * d19 * 1979 , 764 | particle production rapidities p-a reactions probes partons low - x values high energy large rapidities nucleii gluon distribution saturate modify particle rapidity densities spectra hadrons theory qcd for dense low - x systems color glass condensate cgc ) @xcite inspired work brahms measurements of charged hadrons rapidities in 200 gev d - au collisions data obtained with brahms spectrometers 4 dipole magnets 5 tracking chambers two time - of - flight systems ring imaging chrenkov detector angular coverage 2.3@xmath2 to 15@xmath2 solid angle 0.8 msr mid - rapidity spectrometer covers angles 40 90@xmath2 details setup in @xcite collision vertex determined from timing measurements scintillator counters at 1.5 4.15 6.7 meters resolution @xmath3 cm counters minimum bias normalization pp collisions record @xmath4 inelastic cross section details analysis in @xcite spectra charged hadrons in d - au pp collisions at 200 gev presented in fig . 1data at @xmath5 1 average positive charges high rapidity negative pp dau cross sections steeper @xmath6 data d - au collisions compared to p - p nuclear modification factor @xmath7 @xmath8 binary collisions equal to @xmath9 for minimum biased d+au collisions pt dependence factor shown in fig ratio each panel ratio different @xmath6 value mid - rapidity @xmath10 nuclear modification factor exceeds 1 for transverse momenta greater than 2 gev / c nuclear modification factor charged hadrons at pseudorapidities @xmath11 statistical errors with error bars systematic errors shaded boxes shaded band around unity error normalization to @xmath12 dashed lines at @xmath13 gev / c show normalized charged particle density ratio @xmath14 shift one unit rapidity cronin type enhancement higher rapidities ratio smaller than 1 suppression dau collisions four panels statistical errors bars dominant forward measurements results described context color glass condensate @xcite evolution nuclear modification factor rapidity centrality consistent with target rate gluon fusion comparable with gluon emmission rapidity increases slows growth gluon densitymeasured nuclear modification factor compares slowed growth numerator to incoherent p+p collisions dilute systems gluon densities grow faster gluon fusion explanations for suppression proposed reproduce data @xcite focus on charged particle pseudo - rapidity density distributions change in shape vs centrality illustrated in fig.2 by dashed lines at low @xmath15 ratios obtained from brahms data ua5 pp results soft spectrum shows suppression forward angles nuclear modification factor @xmath16 calculated for anti - protons negative pions at @xmath17 same ratio for negative particles shown with filled circles systematic error as grey band nuclear modification factor of baryons different from with mesons baryons show stronger enhancement difference found at energies at all rapidities fig . presents minimum bias nuclear modification @xmath16 for anti - protons negative pions at @xmath17 ratios obtained raw counts identified particles charged particles in @xmath18 bin calculated from measured ratios between anti - protons pions to changed particles to for negatively charged hadrons@xciteattempt estimate contributions anti - lambda feed to anti - proton result difference between baryons mesons related to parton recombination @xcite heavy ion reactions surprising effect in da system forward rapidities small soft parton component increase particle production from dau pp collisions at @xmath19 200 gev different rapidities with brahms setup offers window to small - x components au wave function suppression in particle production high rapidities d+au collisions saturation in gluon distribution function au work supported by division nuclear physics department energy danish natural science research council research council of norway jagiellonian university grants romanian ministry of education research thank r.debbe input l.mclerran r.venugopalan_phys . rev . d49 * 1994 , 2233.adamczyk 2003 , 437 arsene brahms collaboration phys. 9**3 2004 242303 2005 032301 antreasyan rev d19 1979 764 | 0.265766 | 1,695 | 859 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,930 | we study the large - scale structure formation in the universe in the frame of scalar - tensor theories as an alternative to general relativity .
we review briefly the newtonian limit of non - minimally coupled scalar - tensor theories and the evolution equations of the @xmath0-body system that is appropriate to study large - scale structure formation in the universe .
we compute the power - spectrum of the universe at present epoch and show how the large - scale structure depends on the scalar field contribution . | during the last two decades high precision observations have established the existence of two component of the universe .
these are known as dark energy and dark matter .
what are their fundamental nature ?
this one of the questions we need to answer@xcite .
one of the most succesful models to explain observations is the @xmath1cdm but it still has some problems . in the past
we have proposed a dark matter model in the framework of the newtonian limit of a scalar - tensor theory@xcite .
we have done @xmath0-body simulations using a numerical code developed to take into account the scalar field ( sf ) force contribution which is of yukawa type in its newtonian limit and we have use it to study several situations , like collision of protogalaxies@xcite , dynamics and collision of galaxies@xcite , and to study cosmological simulations@xcite .
recently we have used it to address a possible solution to two of the main problems the @xmath1cdm has , i.e. , the tendency to over populate the formed halos of galaxies with satellites and the flatness problem@xcite .
several authors have also been using similar dark matter models to study large - scale structure formation , see for instance@xcite .
one of the tools to characterize the clustering properties of a universe model is the power spectrum .
constraints on cosmological models and on cosmological parameters have been derived from measuring power spectrum .
therefore , in this work we consider a dark matter model build from the newtonian limit of a scalar - tensor theory@xcite and use it to study the large - scale structure formation of the universe by analyzing the power - spectrum versus the parameters of the model .
giving that we are interested in the study of the large - scale structure formation of the universe we will use the newtonian limit of the scalar - tensor theory .
this limit applies in a region small compared to the hubble length @xmath2 , with @xmath3 the speed of light and @xmath4 the hubble factor , and large compared to the schwarzschild radii of any collapsed objects . in this case
the vlasov - poisson equation in an expanding universe describes the evolution of the six - dimensional , one - particle distribution function , @xmath5@xcite .
the vlasov equation is , @xmath6 where @xmath7 is the comoving coordinate , @xmath8 , @xmath9 is the particle mass , and @xmath10 is the self - consistent gravitational potential given by the poisson equation , @xmath11 \right]\ ] ] where @xmath12 is the background mass density .
( [ vlasov_eq ] ) and ( [ poisson_eq ] ) form the vlasov - poisson equation , constitutes a collisionless , mean - field approximation to the evolution of the full @xmath0-body distribution .
an @xmath0-body code attempts to solve eqs .
( [ vlasov_eq ] ) and ( [ poisson_eq ] ) by representing the one - particle distribution function as @xmath13 substitution of ( [ discrete_distribution_eq ] ) in the vlasov - poisson system of equations yields the exact newton s equations for a system of @xmath0 gravitating particles . in the newtonian limit of stt of gravity , the newtonian motion equation for a particle @xmath14
is written as@xcite @xmath15 where the sum includes all periodic images of particle @xmath16 , and @xmath17 is @xmath18 which , for small distances compared to @xmath19 , is @xmath20 and , for long distances , is @xmath21 , as in newtonian physics . to simulate cosmological systems ,
the expansion of the universe has to be taken into account . also , to determine the nature of the cosmological model we need to determine the composition of the universe , i. e. , we need to give the values of @xmath22 for each component @xmath14 , taking into account in this way all forms of energy densities that exist at present . in this work
we will consider a model with only two energy density contribution .
one which is a pressureless and nonbaryonic dark matter with @xmath23 that does not couple with radiation .
other , that will be a cosmological constant contribution @xmath24 .
also , the model must be consistent with a static sf according to the newtonian limit we are using in this work .
thus , the scale factor , @xmath25 , is given by the following friedman model@xcite , @xmath26\ ] ] where @xmath27 , @xmath28 and @xmath29 are the matter and energy density evaluated at present , respectively .
we have also demanded that the universe be a flat one . to be consistent with the cmb spectrum and structure formation numerical experiments ,
cosmological constraints must be applied on @xmath30 in order for it to be within the range @xmath31 @xcite .
in this section , we present results of cosmological simulations of a @xmath1cdm universe with and without sf contribution .
we start our simulations with an initial distribution of @xmath32 particles in a box with sides of @xmath33 mpc at @xmath34 .
this case is similar to the one that comes with gadget 1 @xcite . at present epoch , @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 km / s / mpc , @xmath38 .
we restrict the values of @xmath30 to the interval @xmath31 @xcite and use @xmath39 mpc , since this scale turns out to be an intermediate scale between the size of the clump groups and the separation of the formed groups .
however , we have analyzed elsewhere several values of @xmath19@xcite .
other universe models have been analyzed in @xcite .
because the visible component is the smaller one and given our interest to test the consequences of including a sf contribution to the evolution equations , our model excludes gas particles , but all its mass has been added to the dark matter . in fig .
1 we show the power spectrum at redshift @xmath40 of our @xmath1cdm model for several values of @xmath30 . the line without symbols shows the case of a @xmath1cdm model without the contribution of the scalar field . the line with ( @xmath41 ) is the case of a @xmath1cdm model with scalar field with @xmath42 , the line with ( @xmath43 ) uses @xmath44 , and the line with ( o ) uses @xmath45 .
one notes clearly how the sf modifies the clustering of matter of the system .
the most dramatic cases are the models with @xmath44 and @xmath42 .
we now analyze the general effect the parameter @xmath30 has on the clustering . for a given @xmath19
the role of @xmath30 in our approach can be seen in equations ( [ eq_motion])-([eq_f ] ) and is contained in the factor @xmath17 .
the factor @xmath46 augments ( diminishes ) for positive ( negative ) values of @xmath30 for small distances compared to @xmath19 , resulting in more ( less ) structure formation for positive ( negative ) values of @xmath30 compared to the @xmath1cdm model . in the case of the line with ( @xmath41 ) , for @xmath47
, the effective gravitational pull has been augmented by a factor of @xmath48 , in contrast to case shown with line and ( @xmath43 ) where it has diminished by a factor of 1/2 ; in the model with the line and ( o ) the pull diminishes only by a factor of 3/4 .
that is why one observes for @xmath49 more structure formation in case with line and ( @xmath41 ) , less in case with line and ( @xmath43 ) , and lesser in model with line and ( o ) .
the effect is then , for a growing positive @xmath30 , to speed up the growth of perturbations , then of halos and then of clusters , whereas negative @xmath30 values ( @xmath50 ) tend to slow down the growth .
the general gravitational effect of the scalar - tensor dark matter model is that the interaction changes by a factor @xmath51 for @xmath49 in comparison with the newtonian case . for negative values of @xmath30
the effect is to diminish the formation of structures and the opposite ocurrs for positive values of @xmath30 .
for @xmath52 the dynamics is essentially newtonian . by computing the power spectrum we were able to determine the effects of the scalar field contribution to the galaxy clustering
of course we will need to do a systematic and with greater resolution study and make detailed comparisons with observations to support or to rule out a dark model based on scalar - tensor theories .
10 m. a. rodrguez - meza , j. klapp , j.l .
cervantes - cota , and h. dehnen in _ exact solutions and scalar fields in gravity : recent developments _ , edited by a. macias , j.l .
cervantes - cota , and c. lmmerzahl , kluwer academic / plenum publishers , ny , 2001 , p. 213 . | last two decades high precision observations established existence two component universe known dark energy and dark matter fundamental nature ? need to answer succesful models @xmath1cdm has problems past proposed dark matter model in newtonian limit scalar - tensor theory done @xmath0-body simulations using numerical code scalar field sf ) force contribution yukawa type newtonian limit study situations collision of protogalaxies dynamics collision galaxies cosmological simulations recently used address possible solution main problems @xmath1cdm tendency over populate formed halos galaxies with satellites flatness problem authors using similar dark matter models study large - scale structure formation clustering properties universe model power spectrum constraints on cosmological models cosmological parameters derived from measuring power spectrum work consider dark matter model build from newtonian limit scalar - tensor theory study large - scale structure formation universe analyzing power - spectrum versus parameters model use newtonian limit of scalar - tensor theory limit applies in region small compared to hubble length speed of light hubble factor large compared to schwarzschild radii of collapsed objectsvlasov - poisson equation expanding universe describes evolution six - dimensional one - particle distribution function @xmath5@xcite vlasov equation is @xmath6 @xmath7 comoving coordinate particle mass self - consistent gravitational potential poisson equation @xmath12 background mass density vlasov_eq poisson_eq ] form vlasov - poisson equation collisionless mean - field approximation to evolution full @xmath0-body distribution-body code solve vlasov_eq poisson_eq representing one - particle distribution function as @xmath13 substitution of discrete_distribution_eq ] vlasov - poisson system yields exact newton s equations for @xmath0 gravitating particles newtonian limit newtonian motion equation for particle @xmath14 written as@xcite @xmath15 sum includes periodic images particle @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 small distances @xmath20 long distances @xmath21 newtonian physics simulate cosmological systems expansion universe determine cosmological model composition universe values of @xmath22 for each component @xmath14 energy densitiesconsider model with two energy density contribution one pressureless nonbaryonic dark matter with @xmath23 couple with radiation cosmological constant contribution @xmath24 model consistent with static sf newtonian limit scale factor @xmath25 given by friedman model@xcite , @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 matter energy density evaluated universe flat consistent cmb spectrum structure formation experiments cosmological constraints on @xmath30 range @xmath31 @xcite present results cosmological simulations of @xmath1cdm universe with without sf contribution start simulations initial distribution of @xmath32 particles box sides @xmath33 mpc at @xmath34 case similar to gadget 1 @xcite @xmath35 @xmath37 s / mpc @xmath38 restrict values of @xmath30 to interval @xmath31 @xcite use @xmath39 mpc intermediate scale between size clump groups separation formed groups analyzed values of @xmath19@xcite other universe models analyzed in @xcite visible component smaller sf contribution evolution model excludes gas particles mass added to dark matter fig .show power spectrum at redshift @xmath40 @xmath1cdm model for values @xmath30 line without symbols shows @xmath1cdm model without scalar field line with @xmath41 ) model with scalar field with @xmath42 @xmath43 uses @xmath44 o ) uses @xmath45 sf modifies clustering dramatic cases models with @xmath44 and @xmath42 analyze effect @xmath30 on clustering @xmath19 role of @xmath30 seen in equations eq_motion)-[eq_f contained in factor @xmath17 factor @xmath46 augments diminishes for positive negative values @xmath30 small distances compared @xmath19 more ( less structure formation for positive negative values @xmath30 line with @xmath41 ) @xmath47 effective gravitational pull augmented by factor @xmath48 line @xmath43 ) diminished by factor 1/2 model with line and ( o ) pull diminishes by factor 3/4 @xmath49 more structure formation line and @xmath41 ) less line @xmath43 ) lesser line and o ) positive @xmath30 growth of perturbations halos clusters negative @xmath30 values slow growthgravitational effect scalar - tensor dark matter model interaction changes factor @xmath51 @xmath49 newtonian case negative values @xmath30 formation structures opposite positive values @xmath52 dynamics newtonian computing power spectrum effects scalar field contribution galaxy clustering need systematic resolution study detailed comparisons support rule out dark model scalar - tensor theories a. rodrguez - meza j. klapp j.l . cervantes - cota h. dehnen exact solutions scalar fields gravity recent developments edited. macias lmmerzahl kluwer academic / plenum publishers 2001 p. 213 | 0.315466 | 2,016 | 1,042 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,946 | a representation of the so(3 ) group is mapped into a maximally entangled two qubit state according to literatures . to show the evolution of the entangled state , a model
is set up on an maximally entangled electron pair , two electrons of which pass independently through a rotating magnetic field .
it is found that the evolution path of the entangled state in the so(3 ) sphere breaks an odd or even number of times , corresponding to the double connectedness of the so(3 ) group .
an odd number of breaks leads to an additional @xmath0 phase to the entangled state , but an even number of breaks does not .
a scheme to trace the evolution of the entangled state is proposed by means of entangled photon pairs and kerr medium , allowing observation of the additional @xmath0 phase .
it is well known that when the spin of a spin-@xmath1 particle rotates for a whole cycle on the bloch sphere the wave - function of the particle changes a phase of @xmath0 .
this @xmath0 phase has been observed in several experiments@xcite .
this property is commonly attributed to the topological property , i.e. , the double connectedness of the so(3 ) group . the path on the manifold of the so(3 ) group is categorized into two classes under a continuous deformation , one of which leads to a change of @xmath0 in phase to the wave function , the other does not .
however , it was argued by milman and mosseri@xcite that this @xmath0 phase may be shared by the multi - connectedness of both so(3 ) and so(2 ) groups .
they also argued that , in general , the @xmath0 phase is partly geometric and partly dynamic . only in the extreme case that the spin precesses on the @xmath2 plane in the bloch sphere the @xmath0 phase is fully geometric .
especially , the @xmath0 phase still exists when the spin initially points to the same direction of the magnetic field , where there is no rotation at all . in such case
the @xmath0 phase is fully dynamic .
therefore , this @xmath0 phase may not be directly related to the so(3 ) group .
milman and mosseri found a one - to - one correspondence between the representation of the so(3 ) group and the evolution of a maximally entangled state of a two - qubit system(mes)@xcite .
they adopted a discontinuously changing magnetic field , which suddenly jumps from one direction to another .
this is hardly possible to be accomplished in reality . in the present paper
a rotating magnetic field is used to drive the evolution of a mes .
a clearer formalism is presented for the trajectory in so(3 ) .
a mes finds great application to quantum communication and quantum computation techniques , and also to the study of fundamental problems , e.g. , non - locality , of quantum mechanics@xcite .
much attention has been paid to mes s in recent years .
it is interesting that mes can be applied to the representation of the so(3 ) group . | a two - qubit maximally entangled state ( mes ) of a two - state system can be written as@xcite , @xmath3 where the coefficients @xmath4 and @xmath5 are normalized to unity @xmath6 it is seen that a mes is defined by a pair of complex numbers @xmath7 . to visualize a mes , @xmath4 and @xmath5
can be parameterized to @xmath8 where @xmath9 is a unit vector , and @xmath10 is an angle between @xmath11 and @xmath0 .
hence a mes can also be written as @xmath12 in the parameter space .
it is easy to check that @xmath13 .
that is , @xmath14 and @xmath15 correspond to the same state except for a global phase factor .
this is just the case of the double - valued representation of the so(3 ) group , which is written as @xmath16 corresponding to a rotation @xmath17 in real space to a two - state particle .
although @xmath18 and @xmath19 are the same rotation , one has @xmath20 .
therefore , there is a one - to - one correspondence between the two - qubit mes and the double - valued representation of so(3 ) .
in fact , any mes can be constructed by a rotation from an initial mes , e.g. , @xmath21 where @xmath22 operates on the first particle .
if a rotation operates on the second particle , one has @xmath23
one could define a so(3 ) sphere with diameter @xmath0 filled by vectors @xmath24 .
due to ( [ p10 ] ) a mes corresponds to a point in the so(3 ) sphere , and an evolution of mes corresponds to a trajectory connecting two points .
the initial state @xmath25 locates at the center of the so(3 ) sphere .
consider an electron in a rotating magnetic field @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the angle between the field and the z - axis , and @xmath28 is the rotating frequency of the field .
the hamiltonian of the electron is given by @xmath29 the two exact solutions of the time - dependent schrdinger equation are given by @xmath30 corresponding to energy eigenvalues @xmath31 and @xmath32 , respectively , where @xmath33 where the values of @xmath34 can be determined by normalization of solutions .
now consider an initial state @xmath35/\sqrt(2 ) \\
\label{evolution1 } & = & |(\alpha , \beta)\rangle = d_1(\omega t,\omega_0 ) |(1,0)\rangle\end{aligned}\ ] ] where new arguments have been assigned to the group element for convenience , and @xmath36 e^{-i\omega_0 t } , \\
\label{b1 } \beta & = & i \sin\frac { \omega t } 2 \frac { a_+ } { a_- } \frac { \hbar ( \omega-2\omega_0)-2b \cos\theta } { 2\hbar \omega_0 } e^{i\omega_0 t}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is seen that a rotating magnetic field leads to an evolution of a mes through a continuous trajectory in the so(3 ) sphere .
therefore , a rotating magnetic field is equivalent to a three dimensional rotation in real space to the mes .
it is not surprising that when @xmath37 , the initial state acquires an additional phase of @xmath0 , i.e. , @xmath38 the amazing property is that the above operation can be allocated to two particles of the initial state , i.e. , @xmath39 in general , one does not have such a property for other initial state . if @xmath40 one will have @xmath41 acquiring no additional phase .
hence , one has a choice for the additional phase through selecting the value of @xmath42 .
now we can trace the following evolution @xmath43/\sqrt(2 ) \\ & = & d_1(\omega t,\omega_0 ) d_2(\omega t,\omega_0 ) |(1,0)\rangle\end{aligned}\ ] ] under the choice @xmath44 this evolution makes a closed trajectory in the so(3 ) sphere .
an example is shown in fig.1 , where parameters @xmath27 and @xmath45 are set to meet @xmath46 .
the final time is @xmath47 , that is , both magnetic fields of the two electrons rotate half a cycle . it is seen that this trajectory breaks three times on the surface of the sphere .
it is known that two ends of a diameter of the sphere correspond to the same rotation but the group element , ( [ dka ] ) , changes its sign . in this case , through a whole trajectory , the mes acquires an additional phase of @xmath0 . .
the arrow stands for the beginning state and direction of evolution . ] with proper parameters , one can have closed trajectories with even numbers of breaks , corresponding to a change of @xmath48 in phase .
an example is shown in fig.2 .
hence , one has two classes of trajectories , one of which has an odd number of breaks on the surface of the so(3 ) sphere and the other has an even number of breaks , corresponding to the two classes of the double connectedness of the so(3 ) group .
this is the case that milman and mosseri considered@xcite , whereas their trajectories are hardly possible to be realized , since their magnetic field has to jump through a few discrete points in the parameter space . .
the arrow stands for the beginning state and direction of evolution . ]
it can easily checked that the closed trajectories @xmath49 and @xmath50 and other ones that milman and mosseri considered @xcite belong to the two simplest classes of trajectories which have @xmath11 or @xmath51 breaks , respectively , in the so(3 ) sphere .
therefore , the present work extends their model to include a great number of closed trajectories with even or odd numbers of breaks .
a entangled photon pair emerging from a double refraction crystal@xcite can be in one of four bell states @xmath52 , where @xmath53 and @xmath54 denote a horizontally polarized photon state and a vertically polarized one , respectively .
this two entangled photons separate with each other after emission , and then pass through two negative kerr medium p1 and p3 , and two positive kerr medium p2 and p4 , as seen in fig.3 .
the kerr medium are modulated by electric fields , so that their optical axes are in directions as shown in the lower part in fig.3 .
p1 and p3 point to the same direction , say z - axis , and the directions of p2 and p4 can be adjusted by changing the directions of their electric fields .
p1 and p3 change the relative phase between @xmath53 and @xmath54 , working as the following matrix @xmath55 where @xmath56 is the electric field applied to kerr medium p1 and p3 . since the optical exes of p2 and p4 take an angle of @xmath57 with the z - axis , they work as the following matrix , @xmath58 where @xmath59 is the electric field applied to p3 and p4 .
it is seen that the combination , @xmath60 , is equivalent to a rotating magnetic field . by comparing eqs.([evolution1],[a1],[b1 ] ) and
eqs.([u1],[a],[b ] ) one finds correspondence @xmath61 .
hence , the evolution in eq.([evolution ] ) , as shown in fig.1 and fig.2 , can be exactly traced by varying the electric fields @xmath56 and @xmath59 on the kerr medium . with proper values of electric fields such that @xmath62 one may obtain an additional @xmath0 phase , or zero additional phase if @xmath63 .
the @xmath0 phase can be easily observed by various interference experiments .
for example , according to the scheme described by milman and mosseri considered @xcite , one arm of the entangled photon pair can be transformed into a mach - zender interferometer .
the two wave plates in that scheme are replaced by combinations of kerr medium p1 and p2 , and that of p3 and p4 . in summary , the present paper sets up a representation for the so(3 ) group by maximally entangled two - qubit states .
the evolution of the entangled states showed the double connectedness of the so(3 ) group . in the so(3 ) sphere the evolution path breaks an odd or even number of times .
an odd number of breaks causes an additional @xmath0 phase to the entangled state , but an even number of breaks does not .
the additional @xmath0 phase can be observed by interference experiments of entangled photon pairs .
s. a. werner _
et al . _ ,
* 35 * , 1053(1975 ) .
_ , phys . lett . *
54a * , 425(1975 ) .
p. milman and r. mosseri , phys .
lett . * 90 * , 230403 - 1(2003 ) .
w. t. buttler , _ et al .
_ , phys . rev
. lett . * 81 * , 3283(1998 ) .
a. zeilinger , phys .
world * 11 * , 35(1998 ) .
jian - wei pan _
et al . _ ,
nature * 423 * , 417(2003 ) ; p. g. kwiat , k. mattle , _ et al .
75 * , 4337(1995 ) . | two - qubit entangled state mes ) written as@xcite @xmath3 coefficients @xmath4 @xmath5 normalized to unity mes defined by complex numbers @xmath7 @xmath4 @xmath5 parameterized to @xmath8 @xmath9 unit vector @xmath10 angle between @xmath11 @xmath0 mes written as @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 correspond same state except global phase factor double - valued representation so(3 ) group written as @xmath16 rotation @xmath17 two - state particle @xmath18 @xmath19 same rotation has @xmath20 one - to - one correspondence between two - qubit mes double - valued representation so(3 ) mes constructed by rotation from initial mes @xmath21 @xmath22 first particle second particle @xmath23 so(3 ) sphere diameter @xmath0 filled by vectors @xmath24 mes corresponds to point sphere evolution trajectory connecting two points initial state @xmath25 center so(3 ) sphere electron in rotating magnetic field @xmath26 @xmath27 angle between field z - axis @xmath28 rotating frequencyhamiltonian electron given by @xmath29 two solutions time - dependent schrdinger equation by @xmath30 energy eigenvalues @xmath31 and @xmath32 @xmath33 values @xmath34 determined by normalization solutions consider initial state @xmath35/\sqrt(2 ){evolution1 }\alpha \beta)\rangle = d_1(\omega t,\omega_0 ){aligned new arguments assigned to group element @xmath36 e{-i\omega_0 t }{b1 }\beta\frac { \omega t } a_+_-\omega-2_0)-2b \theta\omega_0\omega_0 t rotating magnetic field leads to evolution mes continuous trajectory so(3 sphere rotating magnetic field equivalent to three dimensional rotation in space @xmath37 initial state acquires additional phase of @xmath0 @xmath38 operation allocated to two particles initial state @xmath39 property for other initial state @xmath40 @xmath41 no additional phase choice for additional phase through selecting value of @xmath42trace evolution @xmath43/\sqrt(2 ) \\ & = d_1(\omega t,\omega_0 ) d_2(\omega t,_0 ) |(1,0)\rangle\end{aligned} choice @xmath44 evolution closed trajectory in so(3 ) sphere example fig.1 parameters @xmath27 @xmath45 meet @xmath46 final time @xmath47 magnetic fields electrons rotate half cycle trajectory breaks three times surface sphere two ends diameter sphere correspond same rotation group element ( [ dka changes sign mes acquires additional phase @xmath0 arrow stands for beginning state direction evolution proper parameters closed trajectories even numbers breaks change of @xmath48 in phase example fig.2 two classes trajectories odd number breaks surface so(3 ) sphere other even number breaks double connectedness so(3 ) group milman and mosseri considered@xcite trajectories magnetic field through discrete points parameter space arrow stands for beginning state direction of evolutionclosed trajectories @xmath49 @xmath50 milman mosseri @xcite belong simplest classes @xmath11 or @xmath51 breaks in so(3 ) sphere present work extends model closed trajectories with even or odd breaks entangled photon pair from double refraction crystal@xcite four bell states @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 horizontally vertically polarized two photons separate after emission pass through negative kerr medium p1 p3 positive medium p2 p4.3 modulated by electric fields optical axes directions p1 p3 point same direction z - axis directions p2 p4 adjusted by changing directions electric fields p1 p3 change phase between @xmath53 @xmath54 matrix @xmath55 @xmath56 electric field to kerr medium p1 p3 optical exes p2 p4 angle @xmath57 with z - axis matrix @xmath58 @xmath59 electric field to p3 p4 combination @xmath60 equivalent to rotating magnetic field comparing eqs.([evolution1],[a1],[b1([u1][b correspondence @xmath61 evolution in eq.[evolution in fig.1.2 traced by varying electric fields @xmath56 @xmath59 on kerr medium proper values fields @xmath62 additional @xmath0 phase or zero phase @xmath63 @xmath0 phase observed by interference experiments scheme milman mosseri one arm entangled photon pair transformed into mach - zender interferometer two wave plates replaced by kerr medium p1 p2 p3 p4 present paper representation for so(3 ) group by entangled two - qubit states evolution double connectedness evolution path breaks odd or even times odd breaks causes additional @xmath0 phase even breaks not additional @xmath0 phase observed by interference experiments of entangled photon pairs werner et al . 35 *, 1053(1975 ) phys . lett 54a 425(1975 ) milman mosseri phys . 90 230403 - 1(2003 ) buttler phys . rev 81 3283(1998 ) zeilinger phys . world 11 35(1998 ) jian - wei pan nature * 423 *, 417(2003 )mattle 75 * 4337(1995 ) | 0.346924 | 2,149 | 1,149 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,949 | the effects of blue horizontal - branch ( hb ) stars on the integrated spectrophotometric indices of simple stellar populations ( ssps ) are addressed .
synthetic spectra are drawn from a grid of simulated globular clusters , constructed so as to reproduce the observed range of hb morphologies in the milky way system .
our models indicate that the h@xmath0 line index increases by as much as 0.75 and the integrated b - v colour becomes bluer by upwards of 0.15 mag because of the contribution from blue hb stars .
we discuss the importance of both optical _ and _ far - uv colours as age discriminants for ssps , in particular for high metallicities .
we suggest that relative age differences ( and consequently their differing hb morphologies ) result in non - linear colour - metallicity relations . | there have been many efforts to develop evolutionary population synthesis models ( e.g. bruzual & charlot 1993 ; worthey 1994 ; buzzoni 1995 ; vazdekis et al . 1996 ; maraston 1998 ; lee et al .
2000,2002 ) in order to analyze the integrated spectrophotometric quantities of globular clusters ( gcs ) and galaxies .
ultimately , the primary use of such software packages lies in attempting to derive the ages and metallicities of stellar populations such that quantitative insights into the processses governing galaxy formation can be uncovered .
age and metallicity drive the integrated spectrophotometry of stellar systems , and they also drive the resulting hb morphology of globular clusters . it is interesting therefore to pose the question as to whether this underlying morphology also manifests itself in the integrated spectrophotometry .
there is reason to suspect that age is the _ global _ `` second parameter '' that controls hb morphology ( after the `` first parameter '' , metallicity - e.g. lee , demarque & zinn 1994 ; sarajedini , chaboyer & demarque 1997 ; rey et al .
2001 ; salaris & weiss 2002 ) , although for some gcs a third ( or more ) parameter may be needed to explain their peculiar hb morphologies ( such as the blue tail phenomenon - e.g. recio - blanco et al .
2002 ) . in what follows
, we describe the unique aspects of our recent models which allow for an accurate determination of the role played by blue hb stars in modifying the spectrophotometric indices of ssps .
the reader is directed to lee et al .
( 2000,2002 ) for details .
we first construct a grid of simulated gcs spanning a range of hb morphologies - in order to match the observed morphology of inner halo galactic gcs ( galactocentric radius @xmath1 8 kpc ) at their currently favoured mean age ( @xmath212 gyr ) and age dispersion ( @xmath3_t_=0 gyr ) a reimers ( 1975 ) mass loss parameter @xmath4=0.65 was required . the salaris et al .
( 1993 ) @xmath5-element enhancement correction was applied to our models .
the modified gaussian mass distribution of demarque et al .
( 2000 ) - with @xmath6=0.02 m@xmath7 - was used , shaping the widths of the `` wavy '' features seen in figure 1 .
the temperature - sensitive b - v and h@xmath0 indices shown there illustrate the magnitude of the contribution of blue hb stars ( thick wavy lines - c.f .
maraston & thomas 2000 ) within @xmath84 gyr of system s mean age .
the resulting wavy features stem primarily from our exploration of parameter space 2@xmath94 gyrs _ older _ than the milky way gcs .
the location of these wavy `` peaks '' is determined by the amount of mass loss adopted . ) as a function of metallicity and age ( individual curves ) .
the wavy features for ssps older than the galactic gcs are driven by the inclusion of blue hb stars.,scaledwidth=100.0% ]
perhaps the greatest value that the addition of far - uv photometry to pre - existing optical data provides is the ability to discriminate _ cleanly _ between young ( @xmath101gyr ) , intermediate - age ( 3@xmath95gyr ) , and old ( @xmath1114gyr ) , metal - rich ( @xmath90.8 @xmath1 [ fe / h ] @xmath1 @xmath90.4 ) , clusters - this ability is demonstrated in figure 2 , where it can be seen that a significant far - uv to optical flux ratio is indicative of either very young or very old systems ( for these metallicities ) . in contrast , intermediate - age clusters are relatively faint in the far - uv .
we suggest that the combination of far - uv and optical colours is a most promising chronometer for ssps ( with the admitted caveat that there are peculiar gcs such as ngc 6388 and 6441 with populations of extremely blue hb stars - e.g. rich et al .
_ if _ there are significant age differences between milky way and giant elliptical gc systems , however , in the sense of the latter being @xmath112 gyr older ( as suggested by lee et al .
2000 ) , then we predict that the majority of metal - rich clusters will be far - uv bright compared to their galactic counterparts . in this respect ,
the outcomes of the recent hst far - uv photometry of gc systems in virgo ellipticals ( pids#8643 & 8725 ) are highly anticipated ; future work with hubble s advanced camera for surveys will also be a fruitful avenue of research .
finally , the upcoming galex mission will shed important light on the uv properties of the m31 globular cluster system , perhaps resolving the controversy regarding their supposed young , metal - rich , nature ( e.g. burstein et al .
1984 ; barmby & huchra 2000 ) .
those galactic gcs with minimal foreground extinction ( filled circles : inner halo clusters ; open circles : outer halo clusters ) are contrasted with our models in the ( @xmath12 @xmath9 @xmath13)@xmath14 , ( @xmath13 @xmath9 @xmath15)@xmath14 , ( @xmath16 @xmath9 @xmath17)@xmath14 , and ( @xmath18 @xmath9 @xmath17)@xmath14 vs. [ fe / h ] planes in figure 3 . the data are taken from harris ( 1996 , 1999 june version ) and harris & canterna ( 1977 ) . we believe this to be one of the first attempts at employing integrated broadband colours to derive relative age differences between subpopulations of galactic gcs .
( @xmath12 @xmath9 @xmath13 ) @xmath10 0.2 ] are used to calibrate our models in the ( @xmath12 @xmath9 @xmath13)@xmath14 , ( @xmath13 @xmath9 @xmath15)@xmath14 , ( @xmath16 @xmath9 @xmath17)@xmath14 , and ( @xmath18 @xmath9 @xmath17)@xmath14 vs. [ fe / h ] planes . the dashed and solid lines represent ages of 10 gyr and 12 gyr , respectively.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] it appears that our models reproduce the differences between inner and outer halo clusters in the sense that the inner halo clusters are not only more tightly grouped along the isochrone than the more scattered outer halo counterparts , but also relatively older .
this relative age difference between inner and outer halo milky way gcs is in agreement with that obtained by salaris & weiss ( 2002 ) from their homogeneous age dating of 55 clusters ( as shown in figure 4 ) .
the hb morphology is responsible for driving the non - linearity seen near [ fe / h ] @xmath2 @xmath91.6 , demonstrating that the inclusion of morphological effects are important if one is to attempt subtle relative age - dating between ssps . as most of the linear colour - metallicity transformation relations ( cmrs ) in the literature
are based upon the limited range in colour of galactic gcs , caution must be employed when extrapolating their use to redder extragalactic systems ( or if there are sizable age differences amongst globular clusters within and between galaxies ) .
recently , kissler - patig et al .
( 1998 ) provided a set of cmrs using the globulars of ngc 1399 , but the apparent systematic offset has been questioned by lee et al .
it remains to be seen if the bimodal colour distributions of extragalactic gc systems can be interpreted as simple metallicity or age differences , or whether a more complicated interplay between metallicity and age must be invoked .
lee sincerely thanks the organizers of this beautiful workshop for their hospitality .
support for this work was provided by the postdoctoral fellowship program of the korea science & engineering foundation , the creative research initiatives program of the korean ministry of science and technology , and the australian research council through its linkage international ( lx0346898 ) and large grant ( a00105171 ) programs .
barmby , p. , & huchra , j. p. 2000 , apj , 531 , l29 bruzual , g. , & charlot , s. 1993 , apj , 405 , 538 burstein , d. , faber , s. m. , gaskell , c. m. , & krumm , n. 1984 , apj , 287 , 586 buzzoni , a. 1995 , apjs , 98 , 69 demarque , p. , zinn , r. , lee , y .- w . , &
yi , s. 2000 , aj , 119 , 1398 harris , h. c. , & canterna , r. 1977 , aj , 82 , 798 harris , w. e. 1996 , aj , 112 , 1487 kissler - patig , m. , et al .
1998 , aj , 115 , 105 lee , h .- c . ,
lee , y .- w . , & gibson , b. k. 2002 , aj , in press ( astro - ph/0208047 ) lee , h .- c . ,
yoon , s .- j .
, & lee , y .- w . 2000 ,
aj , 120 , 998 lee , y .- w . , demarque , p. , & zinn , r. 1994 , apj , 423 , 248 maraston , c. 1998 , mnras , 300 , 872 maraston , c. , & thomas , d. 2000 , apj , 541 , 126 recio - blanco , a. , piotto , g. , aparicio , a. , & renzini , a. 2002 , apj , 572 , l71 reimers , d. 1975 , mm .
ser . 8 , 369 rey , s .- c . , et al .
2001 , aj , 122 , 3219 rich , r. m. , et al .
1997 , apj , 484 , l25 salaris , m. , chieffi , a. , & straniero , o. 1993 , apj , 414 , 580 salaris , m. , & weiss , a. 2002 , a&a , 388 , 492 sarajedini , a. , chaboyer , b. , & demarque , p. 1997 , pasp , 109 , 1321 vazdekis , a. , casuso , e. , peletier , r. f. , & beckman , j. e. 1996 , apjs , 106 , 307 worthey , g. 1994 , apjs , 95 , 107 | efforts develop evolutionary population synthesis models bruzual charlot 1993 worthey 1994 buzzoni 1995 vazdekis 1996 maraston 1998 lee. 2000,2002 ) analyze integrated spectrophotometric quantities globular clusters galaxies primary use software packages ages metallicities of stellar populations insights galaxy formation age metallicity drive spectrophotometry stellar systems hb morphology globular clusters question underlying morphology manifests in integrated spectrophotometry suspect age second parameter controls hb morphology after first metallicity lee demarque zinn 1994 sarajedini 1997 rey 2001 salaris weiss 2002 some gcs third parameter may needed explain peculiar hb morphologies blue tail phenomenon recio - blanco et al . 2002 describe unique aspects of recent models accurate determination role blue hb stars in modifying spectrophotometric indices of ssps reader to lee et al . ( 2000,2002 ) for detailsconstruct grid simulated gcs hb morphologies match inner halo galactic gcs galactocentric radius @xmath1 8 kpc mean age @xmath212 gyr age dispersion @xmath3_t_=0 gyr reimers 1975 mass loss parameter @xmath4=0.65 required salaris et al 1993 @xmath5-element enhancement correction modified gaussian mass distribution demarque et al 2000 @xmath6=0.02@xmath7 shaping wavy features figure 1 temperature - sensitive b - v h@xmath0 indices illustrate contribution blue hb stars @xmath84 gyr system mean age wavy features exploration parameter space 2@xmath94 gyrs older milky way gcs location wavy peaks determined mass loss function metallicity age wavy features ssps older galactic gcs driven blue hb starsvalue addition far - uv photometry to optical data between young @xmath101gyr intermediate - age@xmath95gyr old @xmath1114gyr metal - rich ( @xmath90.8 @xmath1 clusters ability demonstrated in figure 2 significant far - uv to optical flux ratio indicative of young or old systems intermediate - age clusters faint in far - uv combination of far - uv and optical colours promising chronometer for ssps ngc 6388 6441 with blue hb stars significant age differences between milky way and giant elliptical gc systems latter @xmath112 gyr older predict majority of metal - rich clusters be far - uv bright galactic counterparts outcomes of recent hst far - uv photometry of gc systems in virgo ellipticals#8643 8725 anticipated future work with hubble s advanced camera upcoming galex mission light on uv properties of m31 globular cluster system resolving controversy regarding young metal - rich nature burstein et 1984 barmby huchra 2000galactic gcs with minimal extinction filled circles : inner halo open circles outer halo clusters contrasted with models in @xmath12@xmath14 vs [ fe / h ] planes in figure 3 data from harris ( 1996 1999 and harris & canterna ( 1977 ) first attempts integrated broadband colours to relative age differences between subpopulations galactic gcs @xmath12 @xmath10 0.2 ] used to calibrate models in vs [ fe / h ] planes dashed and solid lines represent ages of 10 gyr and 12 gyr .0% models reproduce differences between inner and outer halo clusters inner halo clusters more tightly grouped along isochrone outer relatively older relative age difference between inner outer halo milky way gcs agreement with salaris & weiss ( 2002 ) from homogeneous age dating of 55 clusters in figure 4 )hb morphology non - linearity near fe / h ] @xmath2 @xmath91.6 morphological effects important subtle relative age - dating between ssps linear colour - metallicity transformation relations based limited range colour galactic gcs caution extrapolating to redder extragalactic systems or sizable age differences globular clusters kissler - patig et al . 1998 provided cmrs using globulars ngc 1399 offset questioned by lee et al if bimodal colour distributions of extragalactic gc systems interpreted as simple metallicity or age differences or complicated interplay between metallicity age lee thanks organizers workshop for hospitality support by postdoctoral fellowship program korea science & engineering foundation creative research initiatives program korean ministry of science and technology australian research council grant programs barmby huchra 2000 , apj , 531 , l29 bruzual charlot 1993 apj, 405 , 538 burstein faber gaskell krumm 1984 287 , 586 buzzoni 1995 98 , 69 demarque zinn lee yi2000 119 , 1398 harris canterna 1977 82 , 798 harris 1996 112 , 1487 kissler - patig . 1998 115 , 105 lee lee gibson b 2002 press ( astro - ph/0208047 ) lee yoon lee 2000 120 , 998 lee demarque zinn 1994 423 , 248 maraston 1998 300 , 872 maraston thomas , d. 2000 541 , 126 recio - blanco piotto aparicio renzini 2002 572 , l71 reimers d. 1975 8 , 369 rey , s c. 2001 122 , 3219 rich , r m.. 1997 484 , l25 salaris chieffi straniero 1993 414 , 580 salaris weiss ,. 2002 388 , 492 sarajedini chaboyer demarque p. 1997 109 , 1321 vazdekis , a casuso , epeletier f beckman 1996 apjs 106 , 307 worthey 1994 apjs 95, 107 | 0.426679 | 2,497 | 1,281 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,951 | we derive a formula for the weight system of the multivariable alexander polynomial using determinants , show that it obeys known relations , and satisfies some of the same relations as the single variable polynomial . | when alexander first defined the multivariable alexander polynomial ( mva ) @xcite it was defined only up to sign and powers of the variables .
it was shown by murakami @xcite that once a normalization and an appropriate change of variables is chosen , the polynomial is of finite type . in @xcite a recursive definition of this weight system
was given , whose computation would take exponential time .
we give a closed form formula using determinants , which would be computable in polynomial time .
this explicit formula makes it possible to verify that the relations from @xcite which hold for the single variable alexander polynomial also hold for the multivariable alexander polynomial .
a coloured link ( or chord diagram ) is a link along with a variable associated to each of the components .
we will use the normalization of the multivariable alexander polynomial given in @xcite .
this uses the matrix given by fox free calculus on the wirtinger presentation of the link , with the crossings labeled by the arc starting at that crossing . to compute the multivariable alexander polynomial one first labels all of the arcs , and then labels the crossings by the exiting lower strand
this allows us to create a matrix with rows and colums indexed by the arcs .
the @xmath0 row is given below . 2 [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] then once again we can delete the rows and columns corresponding to @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 . but note that there is no change in the @xmath4 column .
so the contribution of the @xmath5 column is lost , this is equivalent to deleting the column associated to the marked chord .
this is the matrix that was described in theorem 1 .
as a test of this method , we wish to show that this function obeys certain known relations , such as the 4 t relation and the recursive relations in murakami s paper .
each of these relations involve chord diagrams that differ only at one small area .
this means that the matrix formed in computing the invariant will differ in only one block .
the following lemma shows that the relations need only hold among certain minors of that block .
let b be an @xmath6 block matrix of the following form , where a is an @xmath7 matrix , and @xmath8 .
@xmath9 where @xmath10 refers to the matrix formed from the @xmath11 columns of a and @xmath12 refers to m with the @xmath13 columns removed .
* proof : * expand b along the rows of a using cofactor expansion , and collect like terms .
+ let @xmath14 be matrices as in the previous lemma , with the same @xmath15 but different @xmath16 . to show a relation of the form @xmath17 it is enough to show the relation holds on the appropriate minors the @xmath16 s .
* proof : * follows from previous lemma .
+ when we wish to show relations between chord diagrams differing in a region , we note that the matrices used to compute their weight will be of the above form . using this lemma
let us show the following relation holds . to use the previous lemma we make both sides of the relation have the same number of arcs , so we divide the arcs in the left term in three .
the matrices involved will be as follows . 2 @xmath18 @xmath19 for the first matrix in the example above the minors in question are as follows ; 2 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 the corresponding minors for the second matrix are , @xmath26 .
you can see that the first are precisely @xmath27 times those of the second , so the relation holds .
if we cross the chords we get the following two relations .
+ + this allows us to derive the following useful relations .
+ the first relation is a direct consequence of the previous . since it does nt matter how these components connect we can omit the connections from our diagrams .
we can draw elements as in the second relation with the understanding that there will always be an even number of such elements in a diagram .
obviously for more complicated relations we are unable to compute by hand all of the minors involved .
the solution to this is to allow mathematica to do all of the computations for us .
for example here is the computation that shows the 4y relation holds . + using the previous relation we can rewrite the relation as .
+ in the following calculation , we have used the substitution @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 , and a common factor of @xmath32 has been factored from all of the matrices . 2 .... mat[1]= { { 1,1,0,0,0,-1,-1,0,0 } , { -x , y,0,0,0,y ,-
x,0,0 } , { -1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,-1 } , { 0,0,0,-1,0,0,0,1,0 } , { -w,0,-w,0,y,0,0,0,y } } ; mat[2]= { { w,0,0,0,-y,0,w,0,-y } , { -1,1,1,0,0,-1,0,0,0 } , { x ,- y , x,0,0,-y,0,0,0 } , { 0,0,0,-1,0,0,0,1,0 } , { 1,0,0,0,1,0,-1,0,-1 } } ; mat[3]= { { z,0,0,-w,0,0,0,-w , z } , { -1,1,0,0,1,-1,0,0,0 } , { 0,0,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0 } , { 1,0,0,1,0,0,0,-1,-1 } , { x ,- w,0,0,x ,- w,0,0,0 } } ; mat[4]= { { x ,- w,0,0,0,-w,0,0,x } , { 1,1,0,0,0,-1,0,0,-1 } , { 0,0,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0 } , { -1,0,0,1,1,0,0,-1,0 } , { z,0,0,-w , z,0,0,-w,0 } } ; mat[5]= { { z,0,0,-w,0,0,0,-w , z } , { 0,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0 } , { -y,0,w,0,-y,0,w,0,0 } , { 1,0,0,1,0,0,0,-1,-1 } , { -1,0,1,0,1,0,-1,0,0 } } ; mat[6]= { { 1,0,1,0,0,0,-1,0,-1 } , { 0,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0 } , { -y,0,w,0,0,0,w,0,-y } , { -1,0,0,1,1,0,0,-1,0 } , { z,0,0,-w , z,0,0,-w,0 } } ; mat[7]= { { 1,1,0,0,0,-1,-1,0,0 } , { -x , y,0,0,0,y ,-
x,0,0 } , { z,0,z ,- y,0,0,0,-y,0 } , { -1,0,1,1,0,0,0,-1,0 } , { 0,0,0,0,-1,0,0,0,1 } } ; mat[8]= { { z,0,0,-y,0,0,z ,- y,0 } , { -1,1,1,0,0,-1,0,0,0 } , { x ,- y , x,0,0,-y,0,0,0 } , { 1,0,0,1,0,0,-1,-1,0 } , { 0,0,0,0,-1,0,0,0,1 } } ; .... .... z*(minors[mat[1],5]-minors[mat[2],5])-y*(minors[mat[3],5]- minors[mat[4],5])+x*(minors[mat[5],5]-minors[mat[6],5])- w*(minors[mat[7],5]-minors[mat[8],5 ] ) ; l = simplify[% ] ; take[transpose[l],70 ] { { 0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0 } , { 0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0 } , { 0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0 } , { 0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0 } , { 0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0 } } .... from our lemma , since the relation holds for the minors , it holds for the determinants of the original matrices .
so the relation holds for the weight system .
in @xcite additional relations where shown to hold for the weight system of the alexander polynomial , these can be shown to hold for the mva weight system as well . | alexander defined multivariable alexander polynomial @xcite defined to sign powers of variables shown by murakami @xcite once normalization change of variables chosen polynomial finite type in @xcite recursive definition of weight system computation exponential time closed form formula using determinants computable in polynomial time formula relations from @xcite for single variable alexander polynomial for multivariable alexander polynomial coloured link link with variable associated to components normalization of multivariable alexander polynomial in @xcite uses matrix by fox free calculus wirtinger presentation crossings labeled by arc starting crossing compute multivariable alexander polynomial labels arcs labels crossings by exiting lower strand matrix with rows colums indexed by arcs @xmath0 row below delete rows columns to @xmath1 @xmath3 no change in @xmath4 column contribution of @xmath5 column lost equivalent to deleting column associated to marked chord matrix described in theorem 1 test of method function obeys known relations 4 t relation recursive relations in murakami s paperrelations involve chord diagrams at one small area matrix computing invariant in one block lemma shows relations hold among certain minors block let b be @xmath6 block matrix a is @xmath7 matrix @xmath8 . @xmath9 @xmath10 refers to matrix from @xmath11 columns a @xmath12 refers to m with @xmath13 columns removed expand b along rows a using cofactor expansion collect like terms let @xmath14 be matrices previous lemma same @xmath15 different @xmath16 show relation of form @xmath17 relation holds on appropriate minors @xmath16 s show relations between chord diagrams differing in region matrices compute weight above form lemma show relation holds both sides relation have same number arcs divide arcs in left term in three matrices involved @xmath18 @xmath19 for first matrix minors are @xmath20 @xmath25 corresponding minors for second matrix are @xmath26 first are @xmath27 times second relation holds cross chords two relations derive useful relations first relation direct consequence of previousnt matter how components connect omit connections from diagrams draw elements in second relation understanding always even number elements in diagram for complicated relations unable to compute all minors solution allow mathematica do computations computation shows 4y relation holds . previous relation rewrite relation as . following calculation used substitution @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 common factor of @xmath32 factored from matrices. 2 ....mat[1] 1,1,0,0,0,-1,-1,0,0 -x -1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,-1 0,0,0-1,0,0,0,1,0 -w,0,0 mat[2],0 -1,1,1,0,0,-1,0,0,0 x 0,0,0-1,0,0,0,1,0 1,0,0,0,1,0,-1,0,-1 mat[3] z,0,0-w,0 -1,1,0,0,1,-1,0,0,0 0,0,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0 1,0,0,1,0,0,0,-1,-1 x,0,0,0 mat[4] x,x 1,1,0,0,0,-1,0,0,-1,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0 -1,0,0,1,1,0,0,-1,0 z,0 mat[5] z,0,0-w 0,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0 -y,0,w-y,0,0 1,0,0,1,0,0,0,-1,-1 -1,0,1,0,1,0,-1,0,0 mat[6] 1,0,1,0,0,0,-1,0,-1 0,-1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0 -y-y -1,0,0,1,1,0,0-1,0 z,0,0-w,0 mat[7] 1,1,0,0,0,-1,-1,0,0 -x y,0,0,0,0 z,0 y,0,0,0-y,0 -1,0,1,1,0,0,0-1,0 0,0,0,0-1,0,0,0,1 mat[8] z,0,0-y,0 -1,1,1,0,0,-1,0,0,0 x y,0,0,0 1,0,0,1,0,0,-1,-1,0,0,0,-1,0,0,0,1z*(minors[mat[1],5]-minors[mat[2],5])-y*(minors[mat[3],5][mat[4],5])+x*(minors[mat[5],5]-minors[mat[6],5])- w*(minors[mat[7],5]-minors[mat[8],5 ] ) l = simplify[% ] ; take[transpose[l],70 ] { 0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0}{0}{0 0},{0},{0}{0}{0 0}{0}{0}{0}{0} 0},{0},{0},{0}{0}{0} 0},{0},{0},{0},{0},{0 } } relation holds for minors determinants original matrices relation holds weight system additional relations hold weight system alexander polynomial hold mva weight system | 0.342868 | 2,276 | 1,241 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,952 | it is assumed that the current cosmic acceleration is driven by a scalar field , the lagrangian of which is a function of the kinetic term only , and that the luminosity distance is a given function of the red - shift . upon comparison with baryon acoustic oscillations ( baos ) and cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) data the parameters of the models are determined , and then the time evolution of the scalar field is determined by the dynamics using the cosmological equations .
we find that the solution is very different than the corresponding solution when the non - relativistic matter is ignored , and that the universe enters the acceleration era at larger red - shift compared to the standard @xmath0 model .
according to our current understanding about the cosmos , we live in a flat universe which expands in an accelerating rate and it is dominated by a dark component .
identifying the origin and nature of dark energy is one of the biggest challenges for modern cosmology .
since we can only speculate about what dark energy could be , many cosmological models have been proposed and studied so far .
the simplest candidate is a cosmological constant with state parameter @xmath1 , but models with a dynamical component with an evolving state parameter @xmath2 also exist in the literature ( for a review on dark energy models see e.g. @xcite ) .
scalar field models with a non - canonical kinetic term have been discussed in k - inflation @xcite , in which inflation is not due to the potential , but rather to the kinetic term in the lagrangian , and in k - essence models .
@xcite , which are designed to address the issue why the cosmic acceleration has recently begun .
very recently , in @xcite the authors studied a k - essence model assuming i ) a closed form parameterization for the luminosity distance ( for distances in cosmology see e.g. @xcite ) , proposed previously in @xcite , and ii ) that the lagrangian of the scalar field does not depend on the field itself .
however , in that work the matter has been ignored , and in the present article we wish to show that if the presence of matter is also taken into account , the time evolution of the scalar field is very different .
we also find that according to this model , the universe enters the acceleration era at a larger red - shift compared to the standard @xmath0 model .
the theoretical framework is basically the same as in @xcite , apart from the inclusion of matter in the cosmological equations , and the use of baos and cmb data to be mentioned later on .
however , we start by giving a summary of all the ingredients we shall be using , so that the present work is self - contained .
we focus here on the case of a flat universe , since this is a robust prediction of inflation @xcite , and it is also supported by current data @xcite .
the framework is based on four - dimensional general relativity coupled to a single scalar field with a general lagrangian @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is the scalar field and @xmath5 is the standard kinetic term .
therefore , our model is described by the action @xmath6 the energy - momentum tensor for the scalar field is given by @xmath7 where @xmath8 denotes differentiation with respect to @xmath9 .
we can recast this energy - momentum tensor into the form of the energy - momentum tensor for a perfect fluid @xmath10 where @xmath11 are the energy density and the pressure of the fluid respectively .
the hydrodynamical quantities @xmath12 are given in terms of @xmath13 as follows @xmath14 therefore , the equations of motion for the system gravity+scalar field are just the first friedmann equation and the equation for energy conservation @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the hubble parameter , @xmath17 is the scale factor and the overdot denotes differentiation with respect to cosmic time . defining the sound speed of the scalar field
@xmath18 the equation for energy conservation takes the form @xmath19 which generalizes the usual klein - gordon equation of a canonical scalar field in a friedmann - robertson - walker background .
if we now include also the non - relativistic matter , the equations of motion for our system are the friedmann equations and the conservation equation @xmath20 where @xmath21 , @xmath22 is newtons constant , @xmath23 is the energy density of matter ( @xmath24 ) , @xmath25 are the energy density and pressure of dark energy respectively , @xmath26 is the total energy density and @xmath27 is the total pressure . assuming no interaction between dark energy and non - relativistic matter , we have two seperate conservation equations @xmath28 where the second equation for dark energy is equivalent to the equation of motion of the scalar field . if we further assume that the lagrangian of the scalar field depends on the kinetic term only , @xmath29 , the equation of motion can be integrated once @xmath30 where @xmath31 is an arbitrary integration constant , which later on will be taken to be @xmath32 , and @xmath33 is the derivative of @xmath34 with respect to the kinetic term .
all in all , there are three independent equations , namely the equation of the scalar field , the conservation equation for dust , and the second friedmann equation . for a given hubble parameter as a function of the red - shift @xmath35 , the time evolution of the scalar field can be found using the set of the basic cosmological equations .
this will be useful later on ( see equations ( 29 ) and ( 30 ) , as well as the definitions ( 27 ) and ( 28 ) ) .
the comparison of a theoretical model against supernovae data relies on the minimization of @xmath36 with @xmath37 the distance modulus , @xmath38 , where @xmath39 is the absolute magnitude and @xmath40 is the apparent magnitude .
the theoretical apparent magnitude @xmath41 as a function of the red - shift @xmath42 is given by @xmath43 where the luminosity distance @xmath44 for a flat universe can be expressed as @xmath45 and @xmath46 is the speed of light , while @xmath35 is the hubble parameter as a function of the redshift .
we also exploit the cmb shift parameter @xmath47 , since it is the least model dependent quantity extracted from the cmb power spectrum , i.e. it does not depend on the present value of the hubble parameter @xmath48 . the reduced distance @xmath47 is written as @xmath49 where @xmath50 is todays value of the matter normalized density , and we use the cmb shift parameter value @xmath51 , as derived in @xcite .
independent geometrical probes are baryon acoustic oscillations measurements . acoustic oscillations in the photon - baryon plasma are imprinted in the matter distribution .
these baos have been detected in the spatial distribution of galaxies by the sdss @xcite at a redshift @xmath52 .
the sdss team reports its bao measurement in terms of the @xmath53 parameter @xmath54 where the function @xmath55 is defined to be @xmath56 and we have used the value @xmath57 .
we shall assume that the scalar field lagrangian , @xmath29 , is chosen so that the solution of the cosmological equations for the hubble parameter @xmath35 leads to the luminosity distance @xmath58 then the cmb shift parameter as well as the bao @xmath53 parameter , for a given matter density @xmath50 , are certain functions of the two parameters @xmath59 , and if we require that @xmath60 and @xmath61 the two parameters can be determined .
taking @xmath62 we find that the model is viable as long as the two free parameters take the values @xmath63 and furthermore the distance modulus @xmath37 can not be distinguished from the corresponding quantity when the matter is ignored , see figure 1 below . and @xmath64 ( dashed line ) , and b ) our model including matter with @xmath62 , @xmath65 and @xmath66 ( solid line ) .
] to find the time evolution of the scalar field , we introduce the dimensionless scalar field and time as follows @xmath67 where @xmath68 is the age of the universe today , and we use the second friedmann equation .
the dimensionless time @xmath69 as a function of the red - shift is given by @xmath70 while the dimensionless field @xmath71 as a function of the red - shift is given by @xmath72 where @xmath73 , and is given in terms of the assumed ( dimensionless ) luminosity distance @xmath74 by @xmath75 with @xmath59 having the values determined before , and we have used that @xmath76 .
finally , eliminating the red - shift we obtain @xmath71 as a function of @xmath69 , and the solution can be seen in figure 2 below . in the same figure
we also show the polynomial of second degree that best fits the solution @xmath77 in the same interval , which is the following @xmath78 we see that the solution exhibits a global minimum at @xmath79 , which corresponds to a red - shift @xmath80 .
this is the value for which the two terms in ( [ eqn ] ) cancel eachother . in our model including matter with @xmath62 , @xmath65 and @xmath66 ( solid line ) , and the polynomial of second degree @xmath81 that best fits the solution ( dashed line ) . ] before ending our discussion , let us compare the deceleration parameter @xmath82 of the standard @xmath0 model with that of our model .
using the definitions , the deceleration parameter as a function of the red - shift is given by @xmath83 and can be seen in figure 3 , where for @xmath0 we have used the values @xmath84 . in our model the universe enters into the acceleration era at @xmath85 , while in the standard cosmological model this takes place at later times .
model with @xmath86 and @xmath87 ( dashed line ) , and b ) our model including matter with @xmath62 , @xmath65 and @xmath66 ( solid line ) . ] in summary , in the present work we have assumed that the current cosmic acceleration is driven by a scalar field , the lagrangian of which is a function of the kinetic term only , and that the luminosity distance is a given function of the red - shift .
upon comparison with baryon acoustic oscillations ( baos ) and cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) data the parameters of the models are determined , and then the time evolution of the scalar field is obtained by integrating the cosmological equations numerically .
we find that the solution is very different than the corresponding solution when the non - relativistic matter is ignored , and that the universe enters the acceleration era at larger red - shift compared to the standard @xmath0 model . | here we briefly discuss how a given function @xmath88 that vanishes at the origin can be fitted by a polynomial of second degree @xmath89 in a given interval @xmath90 .
we require that the deviation of the function from the polynomial is as lower as it can be , or in other words the integral @xmath91 must be extremized . if we set the first derivatives of @xmath92 with respect to @xmath93 equal to zero @xmath94 we obtain a two - by - two system @xmath95 where we have defined @xmath96 for @xmath97 and @xmath98 . for
the given interval and function the above integrals can be computed , and solving the simple algebraic system we find the values of the coefficients @xmath99 given in the text .
the author acknowledges financial support from fpa2008 - 02878 and generalitat valenciana under the grant prometeo/2008/004 .
e. j. copeland , m. sami and s. tsujikawa , int .
j. mod .
d * 15 * ( 2006 ) 1753 [ arxiv : hep - th/0603057 ] . c. armendariz - picon , t. damour and v. f. mukhanov , phys .
b * 458 * ( 1999 ) 209 [ arxiv : hep - th/9904075 ] . c. armendariz - picon , v. f. mukhanov and p. j. steinhardt , phys .
* 85 * ( 2000 ) 4438 [ arxiv : astro - ph/0004134 ] . c. armendariz - picon , v. f. mukhanov and p. j. steinhardt , phys .
d * 63 * ( 2001 ) 103510 [ arxiv : astro - ph/0006373 ] .
a. bandyopadhyay , d. gangopadhyay and a. moulik , arxiv:1102.3554 [ astro-ph.co ] .
d. w. hogg , arxiv : astro - ph/9905116 .
t. padmanabhan and t. r. choudhury , mon . not .
* 344 * ( 2003 ) 823 [ arxiv : astro - ph/0212573 ] .
a. h. guth , phys .
d * 23 * ( 1981 ) 347 .
d. h. lyth and a. riotto , phys .
* 314 * ( 1999 ) 1 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9807278 ] .
e. komatsu _ et al .
_ [ wmap collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. suppl .
* 192 * ( 2011 ) 18 [ arxiv:1001.4538 [ astro-ph.co ] ] .
y. wang and p. mukherjee , astrophys .
j. * 650 * ( 2006 ) 1 [ arxiv : astro - ph/0604051 ] .
d. j. eisenstein _ et al .
_ [ sdss collaboration ] , astrophys . j. * 633 * ( 2005 ) 560 [ arxiv : astro - ph/0501171 ] . | discuss function @xmath88 vanishes origin fitted polynomial second degree @xmath89 interval @xmath90 require deviation polynomial lower integral @xmath91 extremized derivatives @xmath92 @xmath93 equal zero @xmath94 obtain two - by - two system @xmath95 defined @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 interval function integrals computed algebraic system find values coefficients @xmath99 text author acknowledges financial support fpa2008 - 02878 generalitat valenciana grant prometeo/2008/004 j. copeland m. sami s. tsujikawa mod 15 * ( 2006 ) 1753 hep - th/0603057 armendariz - picon t. damour v f. mukhanov phys 458 * ( 1999 ) 209 hep - th/9904075 steinhardt 85 2000 ) 4438 astro - ph/0004134 63 * ( 2001 ) 103510 astro - ph/0006373 bandyopadhyay d. gangopadhyay a. moulik arxiv:1102.3554 astro-ph.co w. hogg arxiv astro - ph/9905116 t padmanabhan t r. choudhury344 2003 ) 823 astro - ph/0212573 h. guth phys 23 ( 1981 ) 347 h. lyth riotto 314 1999 ) 1 hep - ph/9807278 komatsu wmap collaboration astrophys 192 2011 ) 18 arxiv:1001.4538 astro-ph y wang p. mukherjee astrophys 650 2006 ) 1 astro - ph/0604051 ] j. eisenstein sdss collaboration astrophys 633 2005 ) 560 astro - ph/0501171 ] | 0.130163 | 772 | 404 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,959 | pion electroproduction amplitudes predicted by three theoretical models in the @xmath0 ( gev / c)@xmath1 region are compared .
the objective is to facilitate the analyses of the data from new experiments on investigating the pion cloud effects on the @xmath2 transition form factors . in recent years
, the data of pion electroproduction reactions have been analyzed by using various models for extracting the @xmath3 transition form factors .
the large pion cloud effects predicted by the dynamical models@xcite have motivated new measurements in the low mometum transfer region @xmath4 ( gev / c)@xmath1 . to facilitate the analyses of these new data , we here compare the predictions from three models : the sato - lee(sl )
model@xcite , the dubna - mainz - taiwan(dmt ) model@xcite , and the mainz unitary isobar model ( maid)@xcite . the details of each of the considered models can be found in their original papers and therefore will not repeated here .
we only point out some noticeable differences between them , which are relavent to the understanding of the pion cloud effects . | the deformation of the nucleon and/or @xmath7 is reflected in the non - zero values of the ratios @xmath8_{e2}}{[\bar{\gamma}]_{m1 } } \\ r_{sm}&= & \frac{[\bar{\gamma}]_{c2}}{[\bar{\gamma}]_{m1}},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath9_{\alpha}$ ] denotes the @xmath2 transition with multipolarity @xmath10 ( magnetic m1 ) , @xmath11 ( electric e2 ) , and @xmath12 ( coulomb c2 ) .
as explained , for example , in ref.@xcite , these two ratios at the resonance energy @xmath13 mev can be calculated from the imaginary ( @xmath14 ) parts of the multipole amplitudes of pion electroproduction reactions @xmath15}{im[m^{3/2}_{1^+ } ] } \\ r_{sm } & = & \frac{im[s^{3/2}_{1^+}]}{im[m^{3/2}_{1^+}]}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here the standard notations ( @xmath16 with @xmath17 @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20)@xcite of the multipole amplitudes are used in the right hand sides of the above equations .
the @xmath5 and @xmath6 generated from the considered three models are compared in fig.1 along with the empirical values obtained from performing the amplitude analyses of the data from mit - bates@xcite , mainz@xcite , and jefferson laboratory ( jlab)@xcite . the comparison shown in fig.1 was already given in the publication@xcite by the jlab clas collaboration .
we see from fig.1 that the @xmath6 ( right panel ) ratios predicted by the sl model ( solid curve ) and dmt model ( dashed curve ) are strikingly different in the @xmath0 ( gev / c)@xmath1 region
. however their corresponding predictions of the ratio @xmath5 ( left panel ) are very close in the same low @xmath21 region .
as we will see in figs.3 - 10 , all three models give almost the same @xmath22 amplitude at the resonance position @xmath23 mev .
thus their differences seen in fig.1 can be understood from fig.2 where the @xmath21-dependence of the predicted ratios @xmath24/im[e_{1^+}]$ ] are compared .
we see that the sl model prediction at @xmath25 is very close to the long wavelength limit @xmath26 ( @xmath27 ) which is consistent with the results given in the papers by amaldi , fubini , and furlan@xcite and also by capstick and karl@xcite . on the other hand , the @xmath24/im[e_{1^+}]$ ] of dmt(maid2003 ) model approaches to 2 ( 3 ) at @xmath25 .
thus their predictions of @xmath6 are very different , as seen in the right panel of fig.1 .
as explained in section iv of ref.@xcite , the long wave length limit is used in the sl model to define the bare @xmath12 transition strength as @xmath28g_e(0)$ ] . with @xmath29
determined from fitting the pion photoproduction data , @xmath30 is fixed in the sl model @xmath31 making use of the pion electroproduction data .
in fig.1 we see that the @xmath6 data point at @xmath32 ( gev / c)@xmath1 from mit - bates@xcite and mainz@xcite disagrees with the prediction from the sl model , while it agrees with the results generated from the dmt and maid models .
this difference between the sl model and the dmt model marks the large descrepancies between these two dynamical models in describing the pion cloud effects . as illustrated in fig.10 of ref.@xcite , the pion cloud effect can enhence the @xmath2 @xmath12 transition ( @xmath33 ) ) by a factor of about 2 at @xmath34 ( gev / c)@xmath1 and has a very prounced @xmath21-dependence .
thus the experimental verifications of the predictions in the entire low @xmath21 region given in fig.1 will lead to a detailed understanding of the pion cloud effects .
to give more detailed information for analyzing the new data , we compare in figs .
3 - 10 the multipole amplitudes generated from the sl model ( solid curves ) , dmt model ( dashed curves ) , and maid2003 ( dotted curves ) .
we see that they are in excellent agreement only in the imaginary part of the m1 multipole ( @xmath35 ) . for other resonant multipole amplitudes ( @xmath36 and @xmath37 ) ,
the sl model differs significantly from the other two models .
these differences can lead to rather different predictions on various interference cross sections @xmath38 ,
@xmath39 , and @xmath40
. for non - resonant multipole amplitudes in figs.3 - 10 , the differences between the considered three models are very large in some cases .
however it is not easy to identify experimental observables which are most effective in testing these weaker amplitudes . finally , we list in tables 1 - 4 the multipoles amplitudes generated from the sl model at @xmath41 0 .
, 0.05 , 0.1 , 0.20 , 0.5 .
the corresponding values from dmt and maid can be obtained from the web site listed in ref.@xcite .
more results from the sl model can be obtained from the authors .
this work was supported in part by the u.s .
department of energy , office of nuclear physics , under contract no .
w-31 - 109-eng-38 and japan society for the promotion of science , grant - in - aid for scientific research ( c ) 15540275 .
( left panel ) and @xmath6 ( right panel ) predicted by the sl model[1,2 ] ( solid curves ) , dmt model[3,4 ] ( dashed curves ) , and maid2003[5 ] ( dotted curves ) are compared with the empirical values from mit - bates[7 ] , mainz[8 ] , and jefferson laboratory[9,10].,title="fig:",width=264 ] ( left panel ) and @xmath6 ( right panel ) predicted by the sl model[1,2 ] ( solid curves ) , dmt model[3,4 ] ( dashed curves ) , and maid2003[5 ] ( dotted curves ) are compared with the empirical values from mit - bates[7 ] , mainz[8 ] , and jefferson laboratory[9,10].,title="fig:",width=264 ] | deformation nucleon @xmath7 reflected in non - zero values ratios @xmath8_{e2}}\bar\gamma}_{m1{\bar\gamma_{c2}}{m1}} @xmath9_{\alpha} denotes @xmath2 transition multipolarity @xmath10 magnetic m1 @xmath11 electric e2 @xmath12 coulomb c2 ) ratios resonance energy @xmath13 mev calculated from imaginary @xmath14 ) parts multipole amplitudes electroproduction reactions @xmath15}{im[m^{3/2}_{1^+ }{sm{im^{3/2}_{1^+}^{3/2{1^+}{aligned standard notations @xmath16 @xmath17 multipole amplitudes used right hand sides equations @xmath5 @xmath6 models compared in.1 empirical values amplitude analyses mit - bates@xcite mainz@xcite jefferson laboratory jlab@xcite comparison fig.1 given publication@xcite jlab collaboration fig.@xmath6 right ratios predicted by sl dmt model different in @xmath0)@xmath1 region predictions @xmath5 left close in low @xmath21 region figs.3 - 10 models give same @xmath22 amplitude at resonance position @xmath23 mev differences in.1 from fig.2 @xmath21 ratios @xmath24/im[e_ sl model prediction at @xmath25 close to long wavelength limit @xmath26 ( @xmath27 consistent with results papers amaldi fubini furlan@xcite capstick karl@xcite @xmath24/im[e_{1^+}]$ of dmt(maid2003 model approaches 2 ( 3 ) at @xmath25 predictions of @xmath6 different right panel fig.1 long wave length limit used sl model @xmath12 transition strength @xmath28g_e(0) @xmath29 determined from pion photoproduction data @xmath30 fixed in sl model @xmath31 pion electroproduction data fig.1 @xmath6 data point at @xmath32 ()@xmath1 disagrees with prediction sl model agrees with results dmt maid modelsdifference between sl dmt model marks descrepancies pion cloud effects illustrated fig.10 pion cloud effect @xmath2 @xmath12 transition factor 2 at @xmath34 @xmath21-dependence experimental verifications of predictions in low @xmath21 region lead to detailed understanding pion cloud effects compare figs 3 - 10 multipole amplitudes from sl model dmt model maid2003 agreement in imaginary part m1 multipole ( @xmath35 ) for other resonant multipole amplitudes @xmath36 @xmath37 sl model differs differences lead to different predictions on interference cross sections @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 for non - resonant multipole amplitudes.3 - 10 differences between models large not easy to identify experimental observables testing weaker amplitudes tables 1 - 4 multipoles amplitudes from sl model at @xmath41 0. 0.05 0.1 0.20 0.5 values from dmt maid obtained from web site ref.@xcite more results from sl model from authors work supported by u.s . department of energy office of nuclear physicsw-31 - 109-eng-38 japan society promotion science grant - aid scientific research 15540275 left panel @xmath6 right panel predicted sl model[1,2 dmt model[3,4 dashed maid2003[5 dotted curves compared values mit - bates mainz[8 jefferson laboratory[9,10=264 left panel @xmath6 right panel predicted sl model[1,2 dmt model[3,4 maid2003[5 dotted curves compared empirical values mit - bates mainz[8 jefferson laboratory[9,10=264 | 0.259036 | 1,520 | 844 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,960 | let @xmath0 , @xmath1 an odd prime , act freely on a finite - dimensional cw - complex @xmath2 with mod @xmath1 cohomology isomorphic to that of a lens space @xmath3 . in this paper ,
we determine the mod @xmath1 cohomology ring of the orbit space @xmath4 , when @xmath5 . # 1\{#1 } # 1#1 | let @xmath1 be an odd prime and @xmath6 an integer . consider the @xmath7-sphere @xmath8 @xmath9-times ) .
given integers @xmath10 relatively prime to @xmath1 , the map @xmath11 , where @xmath12 , defines a free action of @xmath13 on @xmath14 .
the orbit spaces of @xmath15 and the subgroup @xmath16 are the lens spaces @xmath17 and @xmath3 , respectively .
thus , we have a free action of @xmath18 on @xmath19 with the orbit space @xmath17 . by a mod @xmath1 cohomology lens space ,
we mean a space @xmath2 whose ech cohomology @xmath20 is isomorphic to that of a lens space @xmath21 .
we will write @xmath22 to indicate this fact .
if @xmath23 acts on a mod @xmath1 cohomology lens space @xmath2 , then the fixed point set of @xmath15 on @xmath2 has been investigated by su @xcite . in this paper
, we determine the cohomology ring ( mod @xmath1 ) of the orbit space @xmath4 , when @xmath15 acts freely on @xmath2 .
the following theorem is established .
_ let @xmath23 act freely on a finite - dimensional cw - complex @xmath24 .
if @xmath25 then @xmath26 is one of the following graded commutative algebras@xmath27 _ 1 .
@xmath28/i,$ ] where @xmath29 is the homogeneous ideal @xmath30 & \hskip -1.25pc \quad\,-c_{hh'}y^{(h+h')/2 } , u_hu_{h'}-b'_{hh'}zxu_{h+h'-2p-1}-c'_{hh'}zy^{(h+h'-2p)/2}\rangle \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 and @xmath37 when @xmath38 .
@xmath39 is the mod-@xmath1 bockstein homomorphism associated with the sequence @xmath40 .
@xmath41/\langle x^2,z^m),$ ] where @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
in this section , we recall some known facts which will be used in the proof of our theorem . given a @xmath15-space @xmath2 , there is an associated fibration @xmath44 , and a map @xmath45 , where @xmath46 and @xmath47 is the universal @xmath15-bundle .
when @xmath15 acts freely on @xmath2 , @xmath48 is homotopy equivalance , so the cohomology rings @xmath49 and @xmath50 ( with coefficients in a field ) are isomorphic . to compute @xmath49
, we exploit the leray serre spectral sequence of the map @xmath51 .
the @xmath52-term of this spectral sequence is given by @xmath53 ( where @xmath54 is a locally constant sheaf with stalk @xmath55 and group @xmath56 and it converges to @xmath49 , as an algebra .
the cup product in @xmath57 is induced from that in @xmath58 via the isomorphism @xmath59 .
when @xmath60 operates trivially on @xmath61 , the system of local coefficients is simple ( constant ) so that @xmath62 in this case , the restriction of the product structure in the spectral sequence to the subalgebras @xmath63 and @xmath64 gives the cup products on @xmath65 and @xmath61 respectively .
the edge homomorphisms @xmath66 & h^q(x_g)\to e_\infty^{0,q}=e_{q+1}^{0,q}\subset \cdots\subset e_2^{0,q}=h^q(x)\end{aligned}\ ] ] are the homomorphisms @xmath67 respectively .
the above results about spectral sequences can be found in @xcite .
we also recall that @xmath68/ ( s^2 ) = \lambda ( s ) \otimes \zz_p[t],\ ] ] where @xmath69 , @xmath70 and @xmath71 .
the following fact will be used without mentioning it explicitly .
@xmath72 _ suppose that @xmath73 acts on a finite - dimensional cw - complex space @xmath2 with the fixed point set @xmath74 . if @xmath75 for @xmath76 then the inclusion map @xmath77 induces an isomorphism @xmath78 for @xmath79 @xmath80see theorem @xmath81 in chapter vii of @xcite ) .
the example of free action of @xmath23 on the lens space @xmath21 described in the introduction is a test case for the general theorem .
all cohomology groups in the proof should be considered to have coefficients in @xmath82 since @xmath83 acts trivially on @xmath61 , the fibration @xmath44 has a simple system of local coefficients on @xmath84 .
so the spectral sequence has @xmath85 let @xmath86 and @xmath87 be generators of the cohomology ring @xmath61 . as there are no fixed points of @xmath15 on @xmath2 , the spectral sequence does not collapse at the @xmath52-term .
consequently , we have either @xmath88 and @xmath89 or @xmath90 and @xmath91 . if @xmath92 and @xmath93 , then we have @xmath94 and @xmath95 for @xmath96 . so @xmath97= m t\otimes ab^{m-1}$ ] , which is true iff @xmath98 .
suppose that @xmath99 .
then @xmath100 is an isomorphism if @xmath101 is even and @xmath102 , and @xmath103 if @xmath101 is odd or @xmath104 .
so @xmath105 for all @xmath106 if @xmath107 or @xmath108 , where @xmath109 ; @xmath110 if @xmath101 is odd and @xmath111 , and @xmath112 , otherwise .
it is easily seen that @xmath113 , for example , if @xmath114 and @xmath115 ( a\in\zz_p)$ ] , then , for @xmath116\in e_3^{2,0}$ ] , we have @xmath117\rightarrow a = 0 $ ] .
a similar argument shows that the differentials @xmath118 are all trivial . if @xmath119 is also trivial , then @xmath120 is trivial for every @xmath106 and @xmath101 , because every element of @xmath121 can be written as the product of an element of @xmath122 by @xmath123 and @xmath124 is obviously trivial . if @xmath125 , then @xmath126 , where the top and bottom lines survive .
this contradicts our hypothesis ; so @xmath127 . if @xmath128 = [ st^p\otimes 1]$ ] , then it can be easily verified that @xmath129 = q[st^p\otimes b^{(q-1)p}]\quad \text{and}\\[.2pc ] & d_{2p+1}[1\otimes ab^{(q+1)p-1 } ] = q[st^p\otimes ab^{qp-1}]\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath130 . consequently , @xmath131 = n ( st^p\otimes ab^{np-1}),\ ] ] which is not true for @xmath132 . on the other hand , if @xmath133 is trivial , then @xmath134 is also trivial for every @xmath106 and @xmath101 , as above .
now @xmath135 for every @xmath136 , so several lines of the spectral sequence survive to infinity .
this contradicts our hypothesis .
therefore , @xmath137 must be non trivial .
assume that @xmath138 = [ t^p\otimes 1]$ ] .
then @xmath139 is an isomorphism for @xmath107 , @xmath140 , and is trivial homomorphism for other values of @xmath101 .
accordingly , we have @xmath141 , and hence @xmath142 the elements @xmath143 and @xmath144 , for @xmath145 are permanent cocyles ; so they determine elements @xmath146 and @xmath147 , respectively . obviously , @xmath148 , @xmath149 and @xmath150 .
let @xmath151 and @xmath152 .
then @xmath153 , @xmath154 , and , by the naturality of the bockstein homomorphism @xmath155 , we have @xmath156 and @xmath157 but @xmath158 .
it follows that the total complex tot @xmath159 is the graded commutative algebra @xmath160/\langle x^2,y^p , z^n , w_hw_{h'},w_hy\rangle,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath161 , @xmath162 .
choose @xmath163 representing @xmath164 for @xmath165 .
then @xmath166 , @xmath167 and @xmath168 .
it follows that @xmath169/i,\ ] ] where @xmath29 is the ideal generated by the homogenous elements @xmath170 and @xmath171 .
here @xmath172 , @xmath173 , @xmath174 , @xmath175 and , when @xmath176 , @xmath177 .
if @xmath178 , then we must have @xmath179 , @xmath180 .
it can be easily observed that @xmath181 is a trivial homomorphism for @xmath101 even and an isomorphism for @xmath101 odd .
it is now easy to see that @xmath182 for every @xmath183 .
so @xmath184 for @xmath185 and @xmath186 .
therefore , we have @xmath187 if @xmath188 is determined by @xmath189 , then @xmath190 .
the multiplication by @xmath191 @xmath192 is an isomorphism for @xmath101 even .
the element @xmath193 is a permanent cocycle and determines an element @xmath194 .
we have @xmath195 and @xmath196 . therefore , the total complex tot @xmath159 is the graded commutative algebra @xmath197/\langle x^2,z^m\rangle\,.\ ] ] notice that @xmath198 is @xmath199 for @xmath200 even and @xmath201 for @xmath200 odd .
hence , @xmath202/\langle x^2 , z^m\rangle,\ ] ] where @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
this completes the proof .
we realize here the second case of our theorem . recall that @xmath23 acts freely on @xmath21 with the orbit space @xmath204 . we claim that @xmath205/\langle x^2,z^m\rangle,\ ] ] where @xmath206 .
it is known that @xmath207 is a cw - complex with 1-cell of each dimension @xmath208 and the cellular chain complex of @xmath207 is @xmath209 where each @xmath210 .
accordingly , the co - chain complex of @xmath207 with coefficients in @xmath18 is @xmath211 where each coboundary operator is the trivial homomorphism .
therefore @xmath212 to determine the cup product in @xmath213 , we first observe that the inclusion @xmath214 induces isomorphism @xmath215 for @xmath216 so that we can identify them . for @xmath217 ,
this follows from the cohomology exact sequence of the pair @xmath218 . the exact cohomology sequence of the pairs @xmath219 and
@xmath220 show that @xmath221 and @xmath222 ; the latter because the homomorphism @xmath223 is surjective .
now , we choose generators @xmath224 and @xmath225 .
then obviously @xmath226 and @xmath227 .
we can assume , by induction , that @xmath228 and @xmath229 generate @xmath230 and @xmath231 , respectively , for @xmath232 .
then , there is an element @xmath233 such that @xmath234 generates @xmath235 ( see corollary 3.39 of @xcite ) .
we must have @xmath236 , otherwise the order of @xmath237 would be less than @xmath1 .
thus @xmath238 generates @xmath235 , and this is true only if @xmath239 generates @xmath240 .
hence our claim .
it is clear from the proof of the theorem that if @xmath178 , then only the second possibility of the theorem holds .
furthermore , if @xmath24 and @xmath241 , then there exists a simply connected space @xmath242 with a free action of @xmath243 such that @xmath244 and @xmath245 ( theorems 3.11 and 2.6 of @xcite ) .
if @xmath23 acts freely on @xmath2 , then the liftings of transformations ( on @xmath2 ) induced by the elements of @xmath15 form a group @xmath246 of order @xmath247 which acts freely on @xmath242 and hence @xmath246 must be cyclic .
it is clear that @xmath246 contains the group @xmath248 of deck transformations of the covering @xmath249 , and @xmath250 .
so @xmath251 .
since @xmath244 , the mod @xmath1 cohomology algebra of @xmath252 is a truncation of @xmath253 .
thus , in this case also , only the second possibility of the theorem holds irrespective of the condition whether or not @xmath254 .
we recall that a paracompact hausdorff space @xmath2 is called finitistic if every open covering of @xmath2 has a finite dimensional open refinement ( see p. 133 of @xcite ) . our theorem and its proof go through for finitistic spaces .
we would like to thank the referee for his / her valuable suggestions which have improved exposition of the paper . | @xmath1 odd prime integer @xmath7-sphere-times integers @xmath10 prime @xmath1 map @xmath11 defines free action @xmath13 @xmath14 orbit spaces @xmath15 @xmath16 lens spaces @xmath17 @xmath3 free action @xmath18 @xmath19 orbit space @xmath17 mod @xmath1 cohomology lens space @xmath2 ech cohomology @xmath20 isomorphic lens space @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 acts @xmath1 cohomology lens space @xmath2 fixed point set @xmath15 @xmath2 investigated determine cohomology ring @xmath1 orbit space @xmath4 @xmath15 acts @xmath2 theorem established @xmath23 act finite - cw - complex @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 graded commutative algebras@xmath27 @xmath29 homogeneous ideal @xmath30 -1.25pc-c{hh'}y{(h+h')/2{h{hh{h+h'-2p-1{hh'}zy^{(h+h'-2p)/2}{aligned @xmath31 @xmath38 @xmath39 mod-@xmath1 bockstein homomorphism sequence @xmath40 @xmath41 x^2,z^m), @xmath42 @xmath43 recall facts theorem @xmath15-space @xmath2 associated fibration @xmath44 map @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 universal @xmath15-bundle @xmath15 acts @xmath2 @xmath48 homotopy equivalance cohomology rings @xmath49 @xmath50 isomorphic compute @xmath49 exploit leray serre spectral sequence map @xmath51 @xmath52-term sequence @xmath53 @xmath54 locally constant sheaf stalk @xmath55 group @xmath56 converges @xmath49 algebra cup product @xmath57 induced @xmath58 isomorphism @xmath59@xmath60 operates on @xmath61 local coefficients simple @xmath62 restriction product structure subalgebras @xmath63 gives cup products on @xmath65 @xmath61 edge homomorphisms @xmath66 & h^q(x=h(x homomorphisms @xmath67 results sequences in @xcite @xmath68/ ( s^2 ) = \lambda ( s ) _p @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 acts on finite - dimensional complex space @xmath2 fixed point set @xmath74 @xmath75 for @xmath76 inclusion map @xmath77 induces isomorphism @xmath78 for @xmath79 @xmath81 chapter free action @xmath23 on lens space @xmath21 test case for general theorem cohomology groups coefficients in @xmath82 @xmath83 acts on @xmath61 @xmath44 simple local coefficients on @xmath84 spectral sequence @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 generators of cohomology ring @xmath61no fixed points @xmath15 on @xmath2 spectral sequence collapse @xmath52-term @xmath88 @xmath89 or @xmath90 @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath95 for @xmath96 @xmath97= m\otimes ab^{m-1}$ ] true @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 isomorphism if @xmath101 even @xmath103 odd @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 or @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath110 odd @xmath111 @xmath112 otherwise @xmath113 @xmath114 @xmath115 ( a_p)$ ] @xmath116 @xmath117\rightarrow a = 0 $ differentials @xmath118 trivial @xmath119 trivial @xmath120 trivial @xmath106 @xmath101 element @xmath121 product @xmath122 @xmath123 @xmath124 trivial @xmath125 @xmath126 top bottom lines survive contradicts hypothesis @xmath127 @xmath128 = [ st^p\otimes 1]$ ] @xmath129 = q[st^p\otimes b^{(q-1)p}]\quad2pc d{2p+1} ab{(q+1)p-1 = q[st^p ab{qp-1}] @xmath130 @xmath131 = n st^p\otimes ab^{np-1 not true @xmath132 @xmath133 trivial @xmath134 trivial @xmath106 @xmath101 @xmath135 @xmath136 lines spectral sequence survive infinity contradicts hypothesis @xmath137 non trivial @xmath138 = t^p\otimes 1]$ ] @xmath139 isomorphism @xmath107 @xmath140 trivial homomorphism values @xmath101 @xmath141 @xmath142 @xmath143 @xmath144 @xmath145 permanent cocyles determine @xmath146 @xmath147 @xmath148 @xmath149 @xmath150 @xmath151 @xmath152 @xmath153 @xmath154 @xmath156 @xmath157 @xmath158 total complex tot @xmath159 graded commutative algebra @xmath160/ x^2,y^p z^n @xmath161 @xmath162 choose @xmath163 @xmath164 for @xmath165@xmath166 @xmath169 @xmath29 ideal generated by elements @xmath170 @xmath172 @xmath176 @xmath177 @xmath178 @xmath179 @xmath180 @xmath181 homomorphism for @xmath101 even isomorphism @xmath101 odd @xmath182 for @xmath183 @xmath184 for @xmath185 @xmath186 @xmath187 @xmath188 determined by @xmath189 @xmath190 multiplication by @xmath191 @xmath192 isomorphism for @xmath101 even @xmath193 permanent cocycle determines @xmath194 @xmath195 @xmath196 total complex tot @xmath159 graded commutative algebra @xmath197/\langle x^2,z^m\rangle @xmath198 is @xmath199 for @xmath200 even @xmath201 for @xmath200 odd @xmath202/\langle @xmath42 @xmath43 completes proof second case theorem @xmath23 acts on @xmath21 orbit space @xmath204 @xmath205/\langle x^2 @xmath206@xmath207 cw - complex 1-cell each dimension @xmath208 cellular chain complex @xmath209 @xmath210 co - chain complex @xmath207 coefficients @xmath18 @xmath211 coboundary operator trivial homomorphism @xmath212 determine cup product @xmath213 inclusion @xmath214 induces isomorphism @xmath215 @xmath216 @xmath217 follows cohomology sequence @xmath218 cohomology sequence @xmath219 @xmath220 show @xmath221 @xmath222 homomorphism @xmath223 surjective choose generators @xmath224 @xmath225 @xmath226 @xmath227 @xmath228 @xmath229 generate @xmath230 @xmath231 @xmath232 element @xmath233 @xmath234 generates @xmath235 corollary 3.39 must @xmath236 order @xmath237 less @xmath1 @xmath238 generates @xmath235 true if @xmath239 generates @xmath240 claim proof theorem @xmath178 second possibility theorem holds@xmath24 @xmath241 connected space @xmath242 free action @xmath243 @xmath244 @xmath245 ( theorems 3.11 2.6 @xcite ) @xmath23 acts on @xmath2 transformations @xmath15 form group @xmath246 @xmath247 acts on @xmath242 @xmath246 cyclic @xmath246 contains group @xmath248 transformations @xmath249 @xmath250 @xmath251 @xmath244 mod @xmath1 cohomology algebra @xmath252 truncation of @xmath253 second possibility theorem holds condition @xmath254 paracompact hausdorff space @xmath2 finitistic if open covering has finite dimensional open refinement p. 133 @xcite ) theorem proof go through for finitistic spaces thank referee suggestions improved exposition | 0.491511 | 3,225 | 1,849 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,970 | define the weight of a matrix to be the number of non - zero entries .
one would like to count @xmath0 by @xmath1 matrices over a finite field by their weight and rank .
this is equivalent to determining the probability distribution of the weight while conditioning on the rank .
the complete answer to this question is far from finished . as a step in that direction
this paper finds a closed form for the average weight of an @xmath0 by @xmath1 matrix of rank @xmath2 over the finite field with @xmath3 elements . the formula is a simple algebraic expression in @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath3 . for rank one
matrices a complete description of the weight distribution is given and a central limit theorem is proved .
random matrices , finite fields , weight , rank .
15a52 ( primary ) , 15a03 , 15a33 , 60c05 ( secondary ) . | for an @xmath4 matrix @xmath5 over the finite field @xmath6 the * weight * of @xmath5 , denoted @xmath7 , is the number of non - zero entries . in the hamming metric on matrices
it is the distance from @xmath5 to @xmath8 .
there is some relationship between the rank and the weight of a matrix .
for example , if @xmath9 , then @xmath10 , and if @xmath11 , then @xmath12 . on the other hand , there are matrices of rank one and maximal weight @xmath13 , such as a matrix with every entry a one . in this article
we determine the average weight of rank @xmath2 matrices in terms of @xmath2 , @xmath0 , @xmath1 , and @xmath3 . without fixing the rank ,
the average weight of @xmath4 matrices is @xmath14 and the weight has a binomial distribution .
however , the full probability distribution of the weight for matrices of rank @xmath2 is yet to be determined .
the tools are those of elementary combinatorics and linear algebra .
nothing special is used from the theory of finite fields other than the understanding that the fundamental ideas of linear algebra work over all fields and not just the real or complex numbers .
we need a modest amount of background material .
we use three basic formulas .
the number of ordered @xmath2-tuples of linearly independent vectors in @xmath15is @xmath16 the first vector is any non - zero vector and each succeeding vector must avoid the span of the previous vectors .
the number of @xmath2-dimensional subspaces of @xmath15 is given by the @xmath3-binomial coefficient @xmath17 the numerator is the number of bases of all @xmath2-dimensional subspaces , while the denominator is the number of bases of any given subspace .
the number of @xmath4 matrices of rank @xmath2 is @xmath18 for a fixed @xmath2-dimensional subspace @xmath19 , the number of matrices with @xmath20 as the column space is equal to the number of @xmath21 matrices of rank @xmath2 .
such a matrix is given by the @xmath2 linearly independent row vectors of length @xmath1 .
the number of those is given by formula 1 .
the number of @xmath2-dimensional subspaces of @xmath22 is @xmath23 and the product is the number of rank @xmath2 matrices given in the first line . by the same reasoning , the second line counts the number of @xmath24 matrices of rank @xmath2 , which is the same .
a special case of formula 3 is worth noting .
the number of invertible @xmath25 matrices is @xmath26
the average weight of a rank @xmath2 matrix is the sum of the average weights of the entries , and the average weight of the @xmath27 entry is the probability that the entry is not zero : @xmath28 the probability that @xmath29 for a rank @xmath2 matrix @xmath5 is the same for all @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
the probability that the @xmath27 entry is not zero is the quotient whose numerator is the number of matrices @xmath5 of rank @xmath2 with @xmath32 , and whose denominator is the number of matrices of rank @xmath2 .
consider the map on the @xmath33 matrices that switches rows 1 and @xmath30 and switches columns 1 and @xmath31 .
this map preserves rank and gives a bijection between the subset of matrices of rank @xmath2 with a non - zero in the 1,1 location and the subset of matrices of rank @xmath2 with a non - zero in the @xmath34 location .
thus , @xmath35 .
call this common value * the average weight per entry*. now we focus on the upper left corner of the matrices of rank @xmath2 .
our analysis depends on the reduced row echelon form .
we recall the definition @xcite .
a rectangular matrix is in _ row echelon form _ if it has the following three properties : 1 .
all non - zero rows are above any rows of all zeros .
each leading entry of a row is in a column to the right of the leading entry of the row above it .
all entries in a column below a leading entry are zero . if a matrix in echelon form satisfies the following additional conditions , then it is in _ reduced row echelon form _ :
the leading entry in each nonzero row is 1 2 .
each leading 1 is the only non - zero entry in its column .
the @xmath21 matrices in reduced row echelon form correspond bijectively with the @xmath2-dimensional subspaces of @xmath15 .
the rows of the matrix give a basis of the corresponding subspace .
when an @xmath36 matrix @xmath5 is reduced to reduced row echelon form by row operations , the result is an @xmath4 matrix whose first @xmath2 rows form a basis of the row space of @xmath5 .
let @xmath37 be the @xmath21 matrix consisting of the @xmath2 non - zero rows of the reduced form
. then @xmath5 and all matrices with the same row space can be constructed from @xmath37 by multiplying @xmath37 on the left by an @xmath38 matrix @xmath39 of rank @xmath2 .
the matrix @xmath39 is unique .
this gives a factorization of @xmath5 as @xmath40 . in terms of the associated linear maps ,
@xmath5 is a linear map from @xmath15 to @xmath22 , which factors into a surjective map onto @xmath41 followed by an injective map from @xmath41 to @xmath22 .
recall that knowing the row space of a matrix is equivalent to knowing the kernel of the associated linear map .
thus , when the reduced matrix @xmath37 is held fixed and @xmath39 is varied , the product @xmath42 gives all maps with the same row space ( i.e. same kernel ) .
for @xmath4 matrices of rank @xmath2 , the average weight per entry is @xmath43 we consider the random selection of a rank @xmath2 matrix such that each such matrix is equally probable . with the factorization @xmath40 ,
this can be done by selecting @xmath39 uniformly from all @xmath44 matrices of rank @xmath2 and by selecting @xmath37 independently from among all reduced row echelon matrices , which is the same as selecting the row space uniformly from all @xmath2-dimensional subspaces of @xmath15 .
the upper left corner of @xmath5 is @xmath45 .
but because @xmath37 is in reduced row echelon form , the first column of @xmath37 is either all zeros or has a leading 1 followed by zeros .
thus , @xmath46 . in order for @xmath47 to be non - zero , both @xmath48 and @xmath49 must be non - zero .
since the selection of @xmath37 is independent of the selection of @xmath39 , @xmath50 the columns of @xmath39 are @xmath2 linearly independent vectors of length @xmath0 and so the first column is not the zero vector .
that means there are @xmath51 possible first column vectors .
there are @xmath52 choices for @xmath53 and @xmath54 choices for the remaining entries of the first column .
therefore , @xmath55
now @xmath56 , and @xmath57 when the row space of @xmath37 contains nothing in the direction of the vector @xmath58 , which is to say that the row space is contained in the @xmath59-dimensional space @xmath60 . therefore , @xmath61 @xmath62 using formula 2 one easily obtains @xmath63 putting these results together we have @xmath64 with this result we have a clear picture of the effect of the parameters @xmath2 , @xmath0 , and @xmath1 on the average weight .
the factor @xmath65 is the average weight per entry without the rank condition , in which case the matrix size does not matter .
note that with @xmath0 and @xmath1 fixed , it is more likely for an entry to be non - zero for matrices of larger rank , an intuitively plausible result because both weight and rank are some measure of distance from the zero matrix . also , one can see that as @xmath0 , @xmath1 , and @xmath2 simultaneously go to infinity , the probability approaches @xmath66 , which is again the unconditioned probability . for invertible matrices of size @xmath1 ( i.e. @xmath67 )
the probability of a non - zero entry is @xmath68
for the matrices of rank one a more complete analysis of the weight distribution is possible . in this case
@xmath39 is a non - zero column vector of length @xmath0 and @xmath37 is a non - zero row vector of length @xmath1 whose leading non - zero entry is 1 .
the rank one matrix @xmath40 is given by @xmath69 , and so the weight of @xmath5 is the product of the weights of @xmath39 and @xmath37 .
the weight of @xmath39 has a binomial distribution conditioned on the weight being positive ( the entries of @xmath39 can not all be zero ) @xmath70 likewise for @xmath37 the weight distribution is given by @xmath71 ( to select a random @xmath37 , choose a random non - zero vector of length @xmath1 and then scale it to make the leading non - zero entry 1 .
the scaling does not change the weight . )
the weight on rank one matrices is the product of these two binomial random variables , each conditioned to be positive .
@xmath72 not all weights between 1 and @xmath13 occur for rank 1 matrices since the weight is a product with one factor no greater than @xmath0 and the other factor no greater than @xmath1 .
plots of actual probability distributions show spikes and gaps .
plots of cumulative distributions are smoother and lead us to expect a limiting normal distribution .
see figures 1 and 2 .
the weight random variable for rank one matrices of size @xmath36 is the product of independent binomial random variables conditioned on being positive .
define @xmath73 , where @xmath74 , @xmath75 , and @xmath76 and @xmath77 are independent bernoulli random variables with probability @xmath78 of being 0 .
then @xmath20 is the sum of @xmath0 independent identically distributed random variables @xmath79 .
conditioning @xmath20 on @xmath80 is the weight of rank one matrices . by the central limit
theorem the distribution of @xmath20 converges , as @xmath81 , to a normal distribution after suitable scaling .
now conditioning on @xmath20 being positive does not change this result because the probability that @xmath80 is @xmath82 , which goes to 1 as @xmath81 .
@xmath86 expanding and using the independence of the random variables @xmath87 and the fact that @xmath88 and @xmath89 , we get @xmath90 the variance of the weight is @xmath91 furthermore @xmath92 combining these expressions we get @xmath93 we get a good approximation to the variance of the weight when @xmath0 and @xmath1 using the unconditioned @xmath20 , essentially the factors in the denominator by 1 .
thus , @xmath94 which can be simplified to give @xmath95 | @xmath4 matrix @xmath5 over finite field @xmath6 weight of @xmath5 @xmath7 number non - zero entries hamming metric matrices distance from @xmath5 to @xmath8 relationship between rank weight matrix @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 matrices rank one maximal weight @xmath13 every entry one average weight of rank @xmath2 matrices @xmath2 @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath3 without fixing rank average weight @xmath4 matrices @xmath14 binomial distribution full probability distribution weight for matrices rank @xmath2 determined tools elementary combinatorics linear algebra theory finite fields ideas linear algebra work fields background material three formulas number of ordered @xmath2-tuples independent vectors in @xmath15is @xmath16 first vector non - zero vector succeeding vector avoid span previous vectors number of @xmath2-dimensional subspaces of @xmath15 @xmath3-binomial coefficient @xmath17 numerator number of bases all subspaces denominator number bases subspacenumber @xmath4 matrices rank @xmath2 is @xmath18 fixed subspace @xmath19 matrices @xmath20 column space equal @xmath21 matrices @xmath2 matrix given by @xmath2 row vectors @xmath1 number given by formula 1 subspaces @xmath22 is @xmath23 product number rank @xmath2 matrices first line second line counts @xmath24 matrices rank @xmath2 special case formula 3 number invertible @xmath25 matrices is @xmath26 average weight rank @xmath2 matrix sum average weights entries average weight @xmath27 entry probability entry not zero probability @xmath29 rank @xmath2 matrix @xmath5 same @xmath30 @xmath31 probability @xmath27 entry not zero quotient number matrices @xmath5 rank @xmath2 @xmath32 denominator number matrices rank @xmath2 map @xmath33 matrices switches rows 1 @xmath30 columns 1 @xmath31 map preserves rank bijection between matrices @xmath2 non - zero 1,1 location - zero @xmath34 value average weight per entry focus on upper left corner matrices rank @xmath2analysis depends on reduced row echelon form definition rectangular matrix in row echelon form if three properties non - zero rows above zeros leading entry right of entries below zero if matrix satisfies conditions in reduced row echelon form leading entry in each nonzero row is 1 leading 1 only non - zero entry in column @xmath21 matrices correspond with @xmath2-dimensional subspaces of @xmath15 rows give basis corresponding subspace @xmath36 matrix @xmath5 reduced to row echelon form result @xmath4 matrix first @xmath2 rows form basis row space @xmath5 @xmath37 @xmath21 matrix @xmath2 non - zero rows @xmath5 all matrices same row space constructed from @xmath37 by multiplying @xmath37 by @xmath38 matrix @xmath39 @xmath2 matrix @xmath39 unique factorization of @xmath5 as @xmath40 @xmath5 linear map from @xmath15 to @xmath22 factors into map @xmath41 to knowing row space matrix equivalent to knowing kernel linear mapreduced matrix @xmath37 fixed @xmath39 varied product @xmath42 gives maps same row space kernel @xmath4 matrices @xmath2 average weight per entry @xmath43 random selection @xmath2 matrix equally probable factorization @xmath40 selecting @xmath39 from @xmath44 matrices @xmath37 reduced row echelon matrices same selecting space @xmath2-dimensional subspaces @xmath15 upper left corner @xmath5 is @xmath45 @xmath37 reduced row echelon form first column all zeros or leading 1 followed zeros @xmath47 non - zero @xmath48 @xmath49 non - zero selection @xmath37 independent @xmath39 columns @xmath39 linearly independent vectors length @xmath0 first column not zero vector @xmath51 possible first column vectors @xmath52 choices @xmath53 @xmath54 choices remaining entries first column @xmath55 @xmath56 row space @xmath37 contains nothing direction vector @xmath58 row space in @xmath59-dimensional space @xmath60@xmath61 @xmath62 formula 2 obtains @xmath63 @xmath64 clear picture effect parameters @xmath2 @xmath0 @xmath1 on average weight factor @xmath65 average weight per entry without rank condition matrix size matter @xmath0 @xmath1 fixed likely entry non - zero for matrices larger rank weight rank distance from zero matrix @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 go to infinity probability approaches @xmath66 unconditioned probability invertible matrices size @xmath1 @xmath67 ) probability non - zero entry @xmath68 matrices rank one complete analysis weight distribution @xmath39 non - zero column vector @xmath37 non - zero row vector leading non - zero entry 1 rank one matrix @xmath40 given by @xmath69 weight @xmath5 product of weights @xmath39 @xmath37 weight @xmath39 binomial distribution conditioned weight positive entries zero @xmath37 weight distribution given by @xmath71 select random non - zero vector scale leading non - zero entry 1 scaling change weight weight on rank one matrices product of two binomial random variables each conditioned positive@xmath72 weights between 1 rank 1 matrices weight product one factor no @xmath0 probability distributions show spikes gaps cumulative distributions smoother limiting normal distribution figures 1 2 weight variable for rank one matrices @xmath36 product of independent binomial variables positive define @xmath73 independent bernoulli variables probability @xmath78 0 @xmath20 sum of @xmath0 independent variables @xmath79 conditioning @xmath20 on @xmath80 is weight of rank one matrices central limit theorem distribution of @xmath20 converges to normal distribution after scaling conditioning on @xmath20 positive change result probability @xmath80 is @xmath82 goes to 1 @xmath86 expanding independence random variables @xmath87 @xmath90 variance of weight is @xmath91 @xmath93 approximation to variance weight @xmath0 @xmath1 unconditioned @xmath20 factors in denominator by 1 @xmath94 simplified @xmath95 | 0.352331 | 2,587 | 1,376 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,980 | the inner crust of a neutron star consists of nuclei immersed in a superfluid neutron liquid . as these nuclei move through the fermionic medium they bring it into motion as well .
as a result their mass is strongly renormalized and the spectrum of the ion lattice vibrations is significantly affected .
consequently we predict that the specific heat and the lattice thermal energy of the coulomb crystal at these densities are noticeably modified . in the standard picture
the inner crust of a neutron star consists of neutrons , protons and electrons . at low temperatures ( @xmath0 mev )
one expects the presence of atomic nuclei ( ions ) immersed in a neutron gas . at the densities : @xmath1 g/@xmath2 g/@xmath3 they form a crystal lattice stabilized by the coulomb interaction .
the electrons which are ultrarelativistic at these densities form a strongly degenerate , uniform gas .
the detailed structure of this part of the star has been the subject of a considerable theoretical effort ( .@xcite and references therein ) . at the bottom of the crust
the appearance of non - spherical nuclei , forming exotic structures , has been predicted . in this region besides the coulomb interaction also the quantum effects , associated with a neutron scattering on nuclear inhomogeneities , play an important role , leading eventually to a disordered phase .@xcite . in order to understand various processes associated with thermal evolution of a neutron star ,
the properties of coulomb crystals in the inner crust have been studied by many authors ( see e.g. .@xcite and references therein ) .
the plasma frequency of the system reads : @xmath4 , where @xmath5 denotes the ion density , @xmath6 is the proton number of an ion , and @xmath7 is the ion mass . since @xmath8 , where @xmath9 is the wigner - seitz cell radius then :
@xmath10 the quantities : @xmath6 and @xmath9 , in the above equation , can be obtained from calculations based on a density functional method .
however , the determination of the ion mass @xmath7 requires a certain caution , since the nucleus is immersed in the fermionic environment and its bare mass has to be renormalized to take into account the interaction with surrounding neutrons .
if the neutrons outside a nucleus have formed a normal fermi gas the problem would have been rather complicated.@xcite . in the inner crust
, however , it simplifies due to the fact that at low temperatures , @xmath11 mev , the neutron gas is predicted to be strongly paired . in this case
one may apply the hydrodynamic approximation which describe the system by an irrotational velocity field .
although at finite temperatures there always exists a gas of quasiparticle excitations which form a normal flow , at temperatures much lower than the critical temperature its influence can be neglected .
we assume in the following that the nucleus has a uniform nucleon density @xmath12 and fills a sphere of radius @xmath13 .
the neutron gas is characterized by the density @xmath14 .
we assume moreover that the flow velocity is below the critical velocity for loss of superfluidity . in order to calculate the mass @xmath7 of an ion ,
the poisson equation for the velocity field has to be solved , both inside and outside a nucleus .
the boundary conditions read : @xmath15 where @xmath16 and @xmath17 stand for the velocity field inside and outside a nucleus , respectively .
the vector @xmath18 is an outward normal to the surface of a spherical nucleus and @xmath19 is a radial coordinate ( the center of a nucleus is placed at @xmath20 ) .
the velocity of the surface element was denoted by @xmath21 .
the first equation stems from the requirement that the phase of the wave function of the superfluid system is continuous , the second one is a conservation of mass in radial flow , and finally the third one ensures that the correct asymptotic behavior for the velocity field is obtained .
the knowledge of the velocity field allows us to determine the kinetic energy and corresponding effective ion mass .
consequently , the following expression for the mass of an ion being a subject of a translational motion can be derived : @xmath22 where @xmath23 , and @xmath24 is a nucleon mass .
the above expression relates the mass of an ion to the density of the neutron gas .
note , that for a uniform system , i.e. @xmath25 the ion mass is equal to zero .
since the nucleon density vary substantially across the inner crust , one expects that the properties of the coulomb crystal will be noticeably modified . indeed , the plasma frequency in the inner crust changes as compared to the value calculated for the case : @xmath26 ( ion in the vacuum ) .
namely , @xmath27 , where @xmath28 corresponds to the plasma frequency for the system with renormalized ion masses . in the fig .
1 we have plotted @xmath29 and @xmath30 as a function of the nucleon density .
one can notice large discrepancies between the value obtained using the bare nuclear mass and the renormalized one .
it clearly indicates that the coulomb crystal becomes more stiff at the bottom of the crust .
consequently the density of the phonon spectrum is also modified as compared to the case of bare ion masses .
the thermodynamic functions : the lattice thermal energy and the specific heat have been shown in the fig .
2 . one can notice that the renormalized values at a given density and temperature are smaller .
in the limit of @xmath31 the analytic expressions for the ratios of lattice thermal energy @xmath32 and specific heat @xmath33 can be derived . applying the phenomenological relations from the ref.@xcite one
gets : @xmath34 where @xmath35 and @xmath36 denote the renormalized values of lattice energy and specific heat , respectively .
the following conclusions can be drawn from the presented results : 1 .
there is a substantial renormalization effect of a nuclear / ion mass in the inner crust of a neutron star , due to the presence of a superfluid neutron liquid .
2 . consequently , the phonon spectrum and thermodynamic functions of the coulomb crystal are significantly altered .
3 .
thermal and electric conductivities of the inner crust , governed by the electron - phonon scattering are expected to be modified . in particular , the contributions coming from umklapp processes have to be recalculated using the renormalized ion masses .
4 . there is clearly a need for consideration of other nuclear degrees of freedom like e.g. shape vibrations , which may significantly modify the electron transport properties . | this research was supported in part by the polish committee for scientific research ( kbn ) under contract no . 5 p03b 014 21 .
numerical calculations were performed at the interdisciplinary centre for mathematical and computational modelling ( icm ) at warsaw university .
author would like to thank aurel bulgac for discussions and valuable comments .
999 g. baym , h.a .
bethe , c.j .
pethick , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a175 * , 225 ( 1971 ) .
negele and d. vautherin , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a207 * , 298 ( 1973 ) ; p. bonche and d. vautherin , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a372 * , 496 ( 1981 ) ; _ astron .
astrophys . _ * 112 * , 268 ( 1982 ) .
pethick and d.g .
ravenhall , _ annu .
nucl . part .
* 45 * , 429 ( 1995 ) .
f. douchin , p. haensel , j. meyer , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a 665 * , 419 ( 2000 ) .
f. douchin , p. haensel , _ phys .
_ * b485 * , 107 ( 2000 ) .
p. magierski , p - h .
heenen , _ phys .
rev . _ * c65 * , 045804 ( 2002 ) .
p. magierski , a. bulgac , p .- h .
heenen , _ int .
* a17 * , 1059 ( 2002 ) .
a. bulgac , p. magierski , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a683 * , 695 ( 2001 ) ; _ nucl .
* a703 * , 892 ( 2002 ) ; _ phys . scripta _ * t90 * , 150 ( 2001 ) ; _ acta phys . pol . _ * b32 * , 1099 ( 2001 ) .
baiko , a.y .
potekhin , d.g .
yakovlev , _ phys .
rev . _ * e64 * , 057402 ( 2001 ) .
a. rosch , _ quantum coherent transport of a heavy particle in a fermionic bath _ ( shaker verlag , aachen , 1997 ) ; a. rosch , t. kopp , _ phys .
lett . _ * 75 * , 1988 ( 1995 ) ; _ phys .
lett . _ * 80 * , 4705 ( 1998 ) ; p. haensel , j.l .
zdunik , j. dobaczewski , _ astron .
astroph . _ * 222 * , 353 ( 1989 ) . | research supported by polish committee research contract 5 p03b 014 21 calculations modelling warsaw university aurel bulgac comments baym bethe pethick nucl . phys . a175 225 ( 1971 ) negele d. vautherin nucl phys. a207 298 ( 1973 ) bonche vautherin nucl phys a372 496 ( 1981 ) astron astrophys . 112 *, 268 ( 1982 ) pethick ravenhall nucl . 45 *, 429 ( 1995 ). douchin p. haensel j. meyer nucl . phys . 665 419 ( 2000 ) douchin haensel phys b485 * 107 ( 2000 ) p. magierski heenen phys . rev. c65 * 045804 ( 2002 ) magierski bulgac heenen a17 *, 1059 ( 2002 ) nucl . phys . a683 695 ( 2001 ) a703 892 ( 2002 ) phys . scripta t90 *, 150 ( 2001 ) acta phys . polb32 1099 2001 ) baiko potekhin yakovlev phys . rev e64 057402 2001 ) a. rosch quantum transport heavy particle fermionic bath shaker verlag aachen 1997 a. rosch t. kopp phys . lett 75 * 1988 1995 ) 80 4705 1998 ) p haensel zdunik dobaczewski astron astroph 222 353 ( 1989 ) | 0.129356 | 654 | 350 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
195,981 | we describe a theoretical approach to compute inclusive widths of heavy hadrons , based on a systematic expansion in the inverse powers of the heavy quark mass .
the method reproduces quite well the experimental ratios of @xmath0 mesons lifetimes . as for @xmath1
, we present a qcd sum rule calculation of the @xmath2 contribution to @xmath3 ; we conclude that such correction is not responsible of the small experimental value of @xmath1 . | a simple theoretical way to consider inclusive decays of hadrons containing one heavy quark is the _ spectator model _ , which states that only the heavy quark participates in the transition , while the light degrees of freedom are unaffected by the process . as a result
, the model predicts that all the hadrons with the same heavy quark should have the same lifetime . on the other hand ,
the experimental ratios of beauty hadron lifetimes are @xcite : @xmath4 @xmath5 eq.([ratiolam ] ) shows that the ratio @xmath6 significantly differs from the spectator model prediction .
one can employ a more refined theoretical approach , based on qcd , to compute inclusive decay widths of heavy hadrons ; the method consists in an expansion in powers of @xmath7 @xcite . by using the optical theorem ,
the inclusive width of a hadron containing the heavy quark @xmath8 into a final state with assigned quantum numbers @xmath9 can be written as : @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the transition operator describing @xmath8 with the same momentum in the initial and final state : @xmath12 \hskip 3 pt .
\label{trans}\ ] ] @xmath13 is the effective weak lagrangian for the decay @xmath14 .
the time ordered product in ( [ trans ] ) is computed by an operator product expansion ( ope ) : @xmath15 where @xmath16 are local operators ordered by increasing dimension , and @xmath17 are coefficients ordered by increasing powers of @xmath18 . as a result , the inclusive width of a heavy hadron @xmath19 ( from now on we will refer to the beauty sector ) is represented by a sum of expectation values over @xmath19 of operators with increasing dimension : @xmath20 . & & \label{ris}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath21 is the ckm matrix element relevant in the considered decay .
the first operator in ( [ ris ] ) is @xmath22 , which has dimension @xmath23 ; next , the chromomagnetic operator @xmath24 , responsible of the mass splitting between hadrons which differ only for the heavy quark spin orientation , has @xmath25 ; finally , @xmath26 have @xmath27 and contribute to @xmath2 in the expansion .
@xmath28 can be further reduced by using the heavy quark equation of motion in the limit @xmath29 : @xmath30 @xmath31 is the heavy quark kinetic energy operator due to its residual motion inside the hadron .
some important features should be noticed in ( [ ris ] ) .
the first term of the expansion reproduces the spectator model result ; @xmath32 terms are absent @xcite since @xmath33 operators can not contribute , being reducible , by equation of motion , to the @xmath23 operator @xmath22 ; finally , @xmath34 and @xmath35 are spectator blind , i.e. they are not sensitive to the light flavour .
@xmath2 terms come from four quark operators , which can be classified as follows @xcite : @xmath36 where @xmath37 , @xmath38 being the gell - mann matrices .
their contribution accounts for the presence of the spectator quark , which participates in the decay through the mechanisms known as weak annihilation and pauli interference ( the latter depends on the presence of two identical quarks in the final state ) . in order to use the result ( [ ris ] )
one has to know the matrix elements of all the previously mentioned operators .
let us define : @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 depends on the spin @xmath42 of @xmath19 : @xmath43 \lambda_2 $ ] .
it enters with @xmath44 in the mass formula for a heavy hadron in the @xmath29 limit : @xmath45 the parameters @xmath46 , @xmath44 , @xmath47 are independent of the heavy quark mass . for @xmath0 mesons
, @xmath48 can be derived experimentally , since it is related to the mass splitting : @xmath49 . on the other hand : @xmath50 , since the light degrees of freedom have zero total angular momentum relative to the heavy quark .
various theoretical determinations exist for @xmath51 . from the mass formula ( [ mass ] ) and using experimental data on the mass of the @xmath52 baryon , one obtains : @xmath53 and hence it can be assumed : @xmath54 . in order to evaluate the matrix elements of @xmath27 operators , different approaches must be used for mesons and baryons . for @xmath0 mesons , factorization approximation gives : @xmath55 @xmath56 being the @xmath57 decay constant .
the same technique can not be applied to baryons , so that one must use other approaches . in the case of @xmath52 ,
heavy quark symmetries reduce the relevant operators to two @xcite : @xmath58 one can parameterize the matrix elements as follows : @xmath59 in the valence quark approximation : @xmath60 . it should be stressed that only large values of the parameter @xmath61 in ( [ otilde ] ) @xmath62 could explain the observed difference between @xmath3 and @xmath63 .
calculations based on quark model @xcite or exploiting the experimental splitting : @xmath64 @xcite give values of @xmath61 smaller than required . in order to have a different theoretical estimate , we computed by qcd sum
rules the matrix elements of the relevant @xmath27 operators over @xmath52 .
this calculation will be described in the next section .
the starting point to evaluate @xmath65 by qcd sum rules within the heavy quark effective theory ( hqet ) is the correlation function : @xmath66|0 > & & \label{corr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath67 , @xmath68 are dirac indices ; the variable @xmath69 @xmath70 is related to the residual momentum of the incoming ( outgoing ) baryonic current @xmath71 with @xmath72 .
a suitable interpolating field for @xmath52 , in the limit @xmath29 , is given by @xcite : @xmath73 where @xmath74 means the transpose , @xmath75 , @xmath76 , @xmath77 are colour indices , @xmath78 is the effective heavy quark field , @xmath79 and @xmath67 is the charge conjugation operator .
@xmath80 is the @xmath52 light flavour matrix : @xmath81 the parameter @xmath82 is fixed to @xmath83 from the qcd sum rules analysis of @xmath84 @xcite , defined by : @xmath85 ( @xmath86 is the spinor for a @xmath52 of four - velocity @xmath87 ) . the hadronic representation of the correlator ( [ corr ] ) can be obtained saturating it by baryonic states , and considering the double pole contribution in the variables @xmath69 and @xmath88 : @xmath89 at the value @xmath90 .
@xmath91 represents the binding energy of the light degrees of freedom in @xmath52 : @xmath92 and must be derived within the same qcd sum rule framework . on the other hand , in the euclidean region , for negative values of @xmath69 , @xmath88 , the correlator ( [ corr ] ) can be computed in qcd , in terms of a perturbative contribution and of vacuum condensates .
the result can be written in a dispersive form : @xmath93 where possible subtraction terms have been omitted .
the explicit expression of the computed spectral function @xmath94 can be found in @xcite .
a sum rule for @xmath95 can be derived by equating @xmath96 and @xmath97 . moreover , invoking a global duality ansatz , the contribution of the higher resonances and of the continuum in @xmath96 in ( [ phad ] ) can be modeled as the qcd term outside the region @xmath98 , @xmath99 , with @xmath100 an effective threshold . finally
, the application of a double borel transform to both @xmath97 and @xmath96 in the momenta @xmath101 : @xmath102 ( and similar for @xmath88 with the borel parameter @xmath103 ) allows us to remove the subtraction terms in ( [ pope ] ) , that are polynomials in @xmath69 or @xmath88 ( the borel transform of a polynomial vanishes ) .
moreover , the convergence of the ope is factorially improved by the transform , and the contribution of the low - lying resonances in @xmath96 is enhanced for low values of the borel variables .
the symmetry of the spectral function in @xmath104 , @xmath105 suggests the choice @xmath106 .
the final sum rule reads : @xmath107 -0.3 cm the result of the numerical analysis of ( [ sr ] ) is depicted in fig .
[ th271_fig1 ] .
a stability window is observed , starting at @xmath108 and continuing towards large values of @xmath109 ; in this range the result for @xmath110 is independent of the external parameter @xmath109 .
the variation of the result with @xmath109 and with @xmath100 provides us with an estimate of the accuracy of the numerical outcome .
we find @xcite : @xmath111 a result corresponding to @xmath112 .
as for @xmath113 in ( [ otilde ] ) , since our computational scheme considers only valence quark processes , a sum rule for the matrix element in ( [ otilde ] ) would give @xmath114 .
the explicit calculation confirms this conclusion . using the computed @xmath61 and @xmath115 in the formulae in ref .
@xcite , we get : @xmath116 .
we presented a method based on the @xmath117 expansion to compute inclusive widths of heavy hadrons .
we also described the qcd sum rule calculation of the matrix element @xmath65 contributing to @xmath2 to the @xmath52 lifetime .
the result : @xmath116 implies that such correction can not explain the observed difference between @xmath3 and @xmath63 .
if the experimental data will be confirmed , a theoretical reanalysis of the problem would be required , as suggested for example in @xcite .
9 j. alcavaz et al .
( lep @xmath0 lifetime group ) , http://wwwcn.cern.ch/ claires / lepblife.html .
i. bigi et al . , in s. stone ( ed . ) @xmath0 decays , world scientific .
j. chay et al . , phys .
b 247 ( 1990 ) 399 . i. bigi et al . , phys .
b 293 ( 1992 ) 430 ; 297 ( 1993 ) 477 ( e ) .
m. neubert and c.t .
sachrajda , nucl .
b 483 ( 1997 ) 339 .
p. ball et al .
, phys . rev .
d 49 ( 1994 ) 2472 .
p. colangelo et al . , phys . rev .
d 54 ( 1996 ) 4622 .
b. guberina et al . , z. phys .
c33 ( 1986 ) 297 .
rosner , phys .
b 379 ( 1996 ) 267 . e.v .
shuryak , nucl .
b 198 ( 1982 ) 83 .
p. colangelo and f. de fazio , phys .
b 387 ( 1996 ) 371 .
g. altarelli et al . , phys .
b 382 ( 1996 ) 409 . p. colangelo et al . , hep - ph/9705390 . | theoretical decays hadrons one heavy quark is spectator model heavy quark participates transition light degrees unaffected model predicts hadrons same heavy quark same lifetime experimental ratios hadron lifetimes @xcite : @xmath4 @xmath5 ratio @xmath6 differs from spectator model prediction refined theoretical approach compute inclusive decay widths of heavy hadrons method expansion in powers of @xmath7 @xcite optical theorem inclusive width of hadron heavy quark @xmath8 into final state quantum numbers @xmath9 written as @xmath10 @xmath11 transition operator @xmath8 same momentum @xmath13 effective weak lagrangian for decay @xmath14 time ordered product computed by operator product expansion @xmath15 @xmath16 local operators ordered increasing dimension @xmath17 coefficients ordered by increasing powers of @xmath18 inclusive width of heavy hadron @xmath19 represented by sum of expectation values over @xmath19 of operators with increasing dimension @xmath20 @xmath21 is ckm matrix element relevant in decayfirst operator [ ris @xmath22 dimension @xmath23 chromomagnetic operator @xmath24 mass splitting between hadrons heavy quark spin orientation @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 contribute @xmath2 expansion @xmath28 reduced heavy quark equation motion @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 heavy quark kinetic energy operator residual motion inside hadron important features ( [ ris ] first term expansion reproduces model result @xmath32 absent @xmath33 operators contribute reducible equation motion @xmath23 operator @xmath34 @xmath35 spectator blind not sensitive light flavour @xmath2 terms four quark operators classified @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 gell - mann matrices contribution spectator quark decay weak annihilation pauli interference two identical quarks use result ( [ ris ] matrix elements operators define @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 depends on spin @xmath42 @xmath19 @xmath43 enters @xmath44 mass formula heavy hadron @xmath29 limit @xmath45 parameters @xmath46 @xmath44 @xmath47 independent of heavy quark mass@xmath0 mesons @xmath48 derived experimentally related to mass splitting @xmath49 @xmath50 light degrees freedom zero angular momentum heavy quark theoretical determinations for @xmath51 mass formula experimental data @xmath52 baryon obtains @xmath53 assumed @xmath54 evaluate matrix elements @xmath27 operators different approaches for mesons baryons @xmath0 mesons factorization approximation @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 decay constant technique baryons other approaches @xmath52 heavy quark symmetries reduce operators to two @xcite @xmath58 parameterize matrix elements @xmath59 valence quark approximation @xmath60 large values parameter @xmath61 @xmath62 explain difference between @xmath3 @xmath63 calculations quark model experimental splitting @xmath64 give values @xmath61 smaller than required different estimate computed qcd sum rules matrix elements @xmath27 operators over @xmath52 calculation described next sectionstarting evaluate @xmath65 qcd sum rules heavy quark theory correlation function @xmath66 @xmath67 dirac indices variable @xmath69 related residual momentum baryonic current @xmath71 @xmath72 interpolating field @xmath52 limit @xmath29 given @xcite @xmath73 @xmath74 transpose colour indices effective heavy quark field charge conjugation operator @xmath80 @xmath52 light flavour matrix parameter @xmath82 fixed @xmath83 qcd sum rules analysis @xmath84 defined @xmath85 @xmath86 spinor @xmath52 four - velocity @xmath87 hadronic representation correlator corr obtained saturating baryonic states considering double pole contribution variables @xmath69 @xmath88 @xmath89 value @xmath90 @xmath91 represents binding energy light degrees freedom @xmath52 @xmath92 derived same qcd sum rule framework euclidean region negative values @xmath69 @xmath88 correlator corr computed in qcd perturbative contribution vacuum condensates result written dispersive form : @xmath93 subtraction terms omittedcomputed spectral function @xmath94 in @xcite sum rule @xmath95 equating @xmath96 @xmath97 global duality ansatz contribution higher resonances continuum in @xmath96 modeled as qcd term outside @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 effective threshold application double borel transform to @xmath97 @xmath96 @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath88 subtraction terms polynomials in @xmath69 or @xmath88 borel transform vanishes convergence ope improved transform contribution low - lying resonances @xmath96 enhanced for low values borel variables symmetry spectral function in @xmath104 @xmath105 suggests choice @xmath106 final sum rule @xmath107 -0.3 cm result numerical analysis depicted in fig . stability window starting at @xmath108 values @xmath109 result @xmath110 independent of external parameter @xmath109 variation result with @xmath109 @xmath100 estimate accuracy numerical outcome @xcite : @xmath111 result corresponding to @xmath112@xmath113 otilde computational scheme considers valence quark processes sum rule matrix element @xmath114 calculation confirms conclusion computed @xmath61 @xmath115 formulae @xmath116 presented method @xmath117 expansion compute widths heavy hadrons described qcd sum rule calculation matrix element @xmath65 @xmath2 @xmath52 lifetime result @xmath116 implies correction explain difference @xmath3 @xmath63 experimental data confirmed theoretical reanalysis required suggested @xcite alcavaz et al . @xmath0 lifetime group http://wwwcn.cern.ch lepblife bigi al stone @xmath0 decays world scientific chay phys . b 247 ( 1990 ) 399 bigi phys 293 1992 ) 430 ; 297 ( 1993 ) 477 neubert sachrajda 483 ( 1997 ) 339 ball phys . rev 49 ( 1994 ) 2472 colangelo phys rev 54 ( 1996 ) 4622 guberina . c33 ( 1986 ) 297 rosner phys . b 379 ( 1996 ) 267shuryak nucl 198 1982 ) 83 de fazio phys 387 1996 ) 371 altarelli 382 1996 ) 409 colangelo hep - ph/9705390 | 0.42496 | 2,677 | 1,419 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,984 | longitudinal and transverse transition form factors for most of the four - star nucleon resonances have been obtained from high - quality cross section data and polarization observables measured at mami , elsa , bates , graal and cebaf . as an application
, we further show how the transition form factors can be used to obtain empirical transverse charge densities .
contour plots of the thus derived densities are shown and compared for the roper and @xmath0 nucleon resonances .
address = institut fr kernphysik , johannes gutenberg - universitt , d-55099 mainz , germany | during the last decade , significant progress on the electromagnetic excitation of nucleon resonances has been obtained . for pion and eta photoproduction very precise data of unpolarized cross sections and photon asymmetries
were measured at mami@mainz , elsa@bonn , legs@brookhaven and graal@grenoble . for electroproduction , at mainz , bonn and bates
measurements for the @xmath1 excitation were performed at low @xmath2 , and for higher @xmath2 up to about @xmath3 gev@xmath4 , at jlab a very large amount of data was collected in an energy range up to the third nucleon resonance region . in parallel with the ongoing experiments , several theoretical groups developed models and analysis techniques , which were applied to the data .
the model - independent gwu / said analysis @xcite mostly analyzed the pion photoproduction data and improved the values of the photon couplings over the years .
coupled channels analyses were performed by the giessen group @xcite and by the bonn - gatchina group @xcite .
transition amplitudes were also determined in the framework of dynamically generated resonances by coupling to meson - baryon channels by the jlich @xcite and ebac @xcite groups . however , most successful concerning the general applicability to the higher resonances , were the unitary isobar models of the mainz group ( maid model ) @xcite and of the jlab group @xcite who used dispersion relations as an additional constraint to reduce the model dependence due to incomplete experimental input .
with our unitary isobar model maid , we analyzed all available electroproduction data in order to determine the transition form factors for all four - star resonances below @xmath5 gev .
in most cases we could obtain both single-@xmath2 and @xmath2 dependent transition form factors for the proton target . in the case of the neutron ,
the parametrization of the @xmath2 dependence had to take a simpler form because of the much smaller world database .
single-@xmath2 data points for longitudinal and transverse form factors have been obtained for transitions from the proton to the @xmath6 @xmath7 and @xmath8 , which can be downloaded from the maid website @xcite . here only results for the @xmath9 , and the @xmath10 are shown .
full results and details of the parameterizations are given in our recent review article , ref .
@xcite .
the main motivation for exploring the nucleon transition form factors is to obtain a precise knowledge of the nucleon excitation spectrum , which provides together with the elastic form factors a complete description of the nucleon s electromagnetic structure .
this structure can be compared with qcd inspired quark models and , in recent years , more and more also with lattice qcd calculations .
the @xmath1 is the only nucleon resonance with a well - defined breit - wigner resonance position , @xmath11 mev .
it is an ideal single - channel resonance , the watson theorem applies , and the breit - wigner position coincides with the k - matrix pole position . for these reasons
, the @xmath12 form factors can be determined in an essentially model independent way . the magnetic form factor shown in fig .
[ fig : p33ffs ] is very well known already from inelastic electron scattering up to high momentum transfer , @xmath13 gev@xmath4 , and can be parameterized in a surprisingly simple form found in our previous maid analysis , @xmath14 with @xmath15 the standard dipole form factor of the nucleon .
electromagnetic form factors of the @xmath16 to @xmath1 transition .
the upper panel shows the magnetic form factor @xmath17 in the definition of ash and the middle and lower panels show the @xmath18 and @xmath19 ratios , respectively .
the curves are the result of our maid2007 fit to the full dataset of pion electroproduction .
the data points are obtained in analyses at fixed @xmath2 .
the open symbols show the results of the jlab analysis @xcite , all others are obtained in our maid analysis .
the two largest @xmath2 values ( @xmath20 ) show the maid and the jlab analyses of the cross sections by villano et al . @xcite . for further details , see our review , ref .
@xcite.,width=453 ] the electric and coulomb form factors are much smaller and are usually given as ratios of @xmath21 and @xmath17 to the magnetic form factor in percent .
figure [ fig : p33ffs ] also compares the maid2007 solutions ( solid lines ) for the ratios @xmath22 and @xmath23 with other analyses .
the ratio @xmath22 from maid2007 stays always below the zero line , in agreement with the original analysis of the data @xcite and also with the dynamical model of sato and lee @xcite who concluded that @xmath22 remains negative and tends towards more negative values with increasing @xmath2 instead of an uprise towards unity .
this indicates that the predicted helicity conservation at the quark level is irrelevant for the present experimental @xmath2 range . for the ratio @xmath23
our @xmath2 dependent fit approaches a negative constant for large @xmath2 in good agreement with the predictions of ji et al .
@xcite , buchmann @xcite and ramalho et al .
@xcite , who use a relation between the ratio @xmath23 and the ratio of the electric and magnetic neutron form factors . for @xmath24 our maid2007 single-@xmath2 analysis for @xmath23 disagrees with the jlab analysis of aznauryan
whereas our analysis stays almost constant , the jlab analysis suggests a much larger negative slope . by repeating our data analysis at @xmath25 and @xmath3 gev@xmath4 in different energy ranges
, we found a strong dependence of the fit on the energy interval used .
our results of 2007 were obtained with the full energy range of the measured data , @xmath26 mev .
figure [ fig : p33ffs ] also shows an analysis ( blue open circles ) in the energy range of @xmath27 mev , much closer to the resonance position . if we choose the energy interval even closer to resonance , @xmath28mev , the errors increase further by a factor of 2 and the @xmath18 ratio becomes large and positive , while the @xmath19 ratio remains the same .
we conclude that the analysis in this @xmath2 range strongly depends on the energy interval and the parametrization of the background used in the analysis and requires further studies .
the helicity amplitudes for the roper resonance @xmath29 are displayed in the upper panel of fig .
[ fig : p11s11ffs ] . our latest @xmath2 dependent solution ( solid lines )
is in reasonable agreement with the single-@xmath2 analysis ( red circles ) .
the figure shows a zero crossing of the transverse helicity amplitude @xmath30 at @xmath31 gev@xmath4 and a maximum at the relatively large momentum transfer @xmath32 gev@xmath4 .
the longitudinal roper excitation @xmath33 rises to large values around @xmath34 gev@xmath4 and produces one of the strongest longitudinal amplitudes that we find in our analyses .
transverse ( @xmath35 ) and longitudinal ( @xmath36 ) electromagnetic form factors of the @xmath37 to @xmath29 ( upper panel ) and @xmath37 to @xmath10 ( lower panel ) transitions .
the curves are the result of our maid2007 fit to the full dataset of pion electroproduction .
the data points are obtained in analyses at fixed @xmath2 .
the open symbols show the results of the jlab analysis @xcite , all others are obtained in our maid analysis . for further details ,
see ref .
@xcite.,width=529 ] the lower panel in fig .
[ fig : p11s11ffs ] displays the results for the @xmath10 resonance .
the red single-@xmath2 data points show our results of 2007 , which are in good agreement with our @xmath2 dependent analysis ( solid lines ) .
the black triangles are the 2009 results of ref .
the blue data point at @xmath38 represents the pdg average over several @xmath39 and @xmath40 analyses .
while we find values around 65 in all maid analyses , the jlab analysis obtains values around 90 for @xmath39 and 110 for @xmath40 @xcite .
also the said and bonn - gatchina groups extract values around 100 , but in a very recent analysis , based on pion photoproduction , shrestha and manley report , however , also a small coupling of @xmath41 @xcite . from the @xmath2
dependent parametrization of the transition form factors we can calculate transverse charge transition densities , as viewed from a light front moving towards the baryon @xcite . for
that we first have to transform the helicity form factors @xmath42 to the dirac - like form factors @xmath43 and @xmath44 , which results in simple linear relations .
the transverse densities are then obtained by a 2-dim fourier - bessel transformation .
the densities relating to @xmath45 appear as fully symmetrical monopole patterns , while the @xmath46 form factors transform to additional dipole patterns ( further details in ref .
@xcite ) .
as an example , in fig .
[ fig : p11s11dens1p ] we show the polarized quark transverse charge densities from the proton to the roper and to the @xmath10 resonances . comparing these results , we find that the dipole contribution of the up and down quarks to the polarized densities is much less pronounced for the @xmath0 due to the much smaller @xmath47 form factor ratio .
comparison of the polarized quark
transverse transition charge densities corresponding to the e.m . transitions @xmath48
( @xmath49 ) ( left panel ) and @xmath50 ( @xmath51 ) ( right panel ) .
the light ( dark ) regions correspond to positive up quark ( negative down quark ) densities . , title="fig:",width=260 ] comparison of the polarized quark transverse transition charge densities corresponding to the e.m . transitions @xmath48 ( @xmath49 ) ( left panel ) and @xmath50 ( @xmath51 ) ( right panel ) .
the light ( dark ) regions correspond to positive up quark ( negative down quark ) densities .
, title="fig:",width=260 ] x .- d .
ma and f. yuan , phys .
* 90 * , 241601 ( 2003 ) .
a. j. buchmann , phys .
lett . * 93 * , 212301 ( 2004 ) .
g. ramalho , m. t. pena and f. gross , phys .
d * 78 * , 114017 ( 2008 ) .
a. n. villano et al . , phys .
rev . * c80
* , 035203 ( 2009 ) . i. g. aznauryan et al .
[ clas collaboration ] , phys .
rev . * c80 * , 055203 ( 2009 ) . m. shrestha and d. m. manley , arxiv:1208.2710 [ hep - ph ] . | last decade progress electromagnetic excitation nucleon resonances obtained pion eta photoproduction precise data unpolarized cross sections photon asymmetries measured at mami@mainz elsa@bonn legs@brookhaven graal@grenoble electroproduction mainz bonn bates measurements @xmath1 excitation low @xmath2 higher @xmath2 @xmath3@xmath4 jlab large data collected third nucleon resonance region theoretical groups developed models analysis techniques applied data model - independent gwu analysis @xcite analyzed pion photoproduction data improved photon couplings coupled channels analyses giessen group bonn - gatchina group transition amplitudes determined generated resonances coupling meson - baryon channels jlich ebac @xcite groups successful higher resonances unitary isobar models mainz group jlab group @xcite dispersion relations reduce model dependence unitary isobar model maid analyzed electroproduction data transition form factors four - star resonances below @xmath5 gev single-@xmath2 @xmath2 dependent transition form factors proton target neutron parametrization @xmath2 dependence simpler smaller world database-@xmath2 data points longitudinal transverse form factors obtained transitions from proton to @xmath6 downloaded from website @xcite results for @xmath9 @xmath10 shown full results in recent review article motivation nucleon transition form factors precise knowledge nucleon excitation spectrum description nucleon s electromagnetic structure compared with qcd quark models lattice qcd calculations @xmath1 only nucleon resonance with breit - wigner resonance position ideal single - channel resonance watson theorem applies coincides with k - matrix pole position @xmath12 form factors determined model independent magnetic form factor in fig . known from inelastic electron scattering high momentum transfer @xmath13@xmath4 parameterized previous analysis @xmath14 @xmath15 standard dipole form factor nucleon electromagnetic form factors @xmath16 to @xmath1 transition upper panel shows magnetic form factor @xmath17 middle lower panels @xmath18 @xmath19 ratios curves result maid2007 fit to full dataset pion electroproduction data points obtained in analyses at fixed @xmath2open symbols show results jlab analysis @xcite others maid analysis two largest @xmath2 values show maid jlab analyses cross sections villano et al review electric coulomb form factors smaller given as ratios @xmath21 @xmath17 to magnetic form factor figure compares maid2007 solutions for ratios @xmath22 @xmath23 analyses ratio @xmath22 from maid2007 below zero line agreement with original analysis @xcite dynamical model sato lee negative tends values increasing @xmath2 predicted helicity conservation quark level irrelevant for experimental @xmath2 range ratio @xmath23 @xmath2 dependent fit negative constant @xmath2 with predictions ji et al . buchmann ramalho et relation between ratio @xmath23 electric magnetic neutron form factors @xmath24 maid2007 single-@xmath2 analysis @xmath23 disagrees with jlab analysis aznauryan analysis constant jlab suggests larger negative slope repeating data analysis at @xmath25 @xmath3 energy ranges found strong dependence fit on energy interval used results 2007 obtained with full energy range data @xmath26figure shows analysis blue in energy range @xmath27 mev closer to resonance position energy interval closer to resonance @xmath28mev errors increase factor 2 @xmath18 ratio positive @xmath19 ratio same analysis @xmath2 range depends on energy interval parametrization background requires studies helicity amplitudes for roper resonance @xmath29 displayed upper panel fig latest @xmath2 dependent solution solid lines with single-@xmath2 analysis red circles shows zero crossing transverse helicity amplitude @xmath30 @xmath31 gev@xmath4 maximum at momentum transfer @xmath32 gev@xmath4 longitudinal roper excitation @xmath33 rises around @xmath34 gev@xmath4 produces strongest longitudinal amplitudes transverse longitudinal ) electromagnetic form factors of @xmath37 to @xmath29 to transitions curves result maid2007 fit dataset pion electroproduction data points obtained in analyses at fixed @xmath2 open symbols show results jlab analysis @xcite others maid analysis lower panel fig . displays results @xmath10 resonancered-@xmath2 data points show results 2007 with @xmath2 dependent analysis black triangles 2009 results blue data point @xmath38 pdg average over @xmath39 @xmath40 analyses values around 65 in analyses jlab analysis values around 90 @xmath39 110 for @xmath40 said bonn - gatchina groups extract values around 100 recent analysis small coupling of @xmath41 @xcite @xmath2 dependent parametrization transition form factors calculate transverse charge transition densities light front towards baryon transform helicity form factors @xmath42 to dirac - like form factors @xmath43 @xmath44 linear relations transverse densities obtained by 2-dim fourier - bessel transformation densities @xmath45 symmetrical monopole patterns @xmath46 form factors transform dipole patterns fig . polarized quark transverse charge densities from proton to roper @xmath10 resonances dipole contribution densities less pronounced for @xmath0 due to smaller @xmath47 form factor ratio comparison of polarized quark transverse transition charge densities e transitions @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50light dark regions positive up negative down quark densities=260 comparison polarized quark transverse transition charge densities transitions @xmath48 left @xmath50 right light dark regions positive up negative down quark densities ma yuan phys . 90 * 241601 ( 2003 ) . 93 * 212301 ( 2004 ) ramalho pena f. gross phys . 78 * 114017 ( 2008 ) villano al . phys . rev. c80 * 035203 ( 2009 ) aznauryan al. collaboration phys . rev. c80 055203 ( 2009 ) m. shrestha d m. manley arxiv:1208.2710 ph | 0.354717 | 2,576 | 1,303 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
195,986 | in this article we give an overview of the the post - linac collimation system for the european x - ray free - electron laser ( xfel ) facility @xcite with main emphasis on lattice and optics design . | the post - linac collimation system should simultaneously fulfill several different functions . in first place , during routine operations , it should remove with high efficiency off - momentum and large amplitude halo particles , which could be lost inside undulator modules and become the source of radiation - induced demagnetization of undulator permanent magnets .
the system also must protect the undulator modules and other downstream equipment against miss - steered and off - energy beams in the case of machine failure without being destroyed in the process . because the collimation system is designed as passive
, the collimators must be able to withstand a direct impact of such number of bunches which can be delivered to their locations until a failure will be detected and the beam production in the rf gun is switched off . from the beam dynamics point of view
, the collimation section , as a part of the beam transport line from linac to undulator , must meet a very tight set of performance specifications .
it should be able to accept bunches with different energies ( up to @xmath0 from nominal energy ) and transport them without any noticeable deterioration not only of transverse , but also longitudinal beam parameters , i.e. it must be sufficiently achromatic and sufficiently isochronous .
this will not only reduce jitter of transverse beam parameters and time of flight jitter due to an energy jitter , but also will allow to fine - tune the fel wavelength by changing the electron beam energy without adjusting magnet strengths ( an energy change of @xmath1 corresponds to @xmath2 change in the fel wavelength ) and , even more , will make possible to scan the fel wavelength within a bunch train by appropriate programming of the low level rf system . some of above requirements are not in good agreement with one another and , as often , the basic problem is to find a balance among all competing factors so as to have at the end a system which still satisfactory fulfills design goals .
for example , relatively large betatron functions , which are needed at the collimator locations to guarantee their survival during occasional beam impacts , lead , as a rule , to unacceptable chromatic aberrations and , therefore , chromaticity correcting sextupoles are essential in preventing the dependence of linear optical parameters on the energy deviation .
chromatic - aberration correction with sextupoles , in the next turn , requires a beamline with dispersion , which makes separate regulation of transverse and energy collimation depths difficult and thus reduces flexibility of a system . in this article
we give an overview of the optics solution which fulfills all listed above requirements , and more details can be found in @xcite .
the part of the beam transport from linac to undulator , which we call the * post - linac collimation section * and which is shown in fig .
[ figoverview ] , consists of two arcs separated by a straight section ( phase shifter ) and includes matching modules at both ends to adapt the optic to the desired upstream and downstream beam behavior .
the collimation section bends the beam in the vertical plane and its length measured in the projection on the linac axis is about @xmath3 .
the outgoing beam axis points slightly downward with an angle of about @xmath4 and the vertical offset of the center of the last quadrupole of the second arc from the linac axis is @xmath5 .
the arcs are almost identical except that in the second arc the polarity of dipole and sextupole magnets is reversed and dipole bending angles are slightly smaller in absolute values in order to produce the net downward beam deflection .
each arc consists of four @xmath6 cells , constitutes a second - order achromat and is first - order isochronous .
three different types of collimators are foreseen in the xfel post - linac collimation system : main primary collimators , supplementing primary collimators and secondary collimators ( absorbers ) .
the principal purpose of the main primary collimators is to intercept trajectories of all incoming particles which would otherwise appear outside of the downstream dynamic aperture .
the main collimators will also shade a part of the beam pipe in the collimation section ( but not all ) from uncontrolled beam impacts . supplementing primary collimators assist to accomplish this work or , at least , reduce the probability of such events .
simultaneously , the supplementing collimators will not affect the transverse and energy collimation depths set by the main collimators . to improve the overall cleaning efficiency at the exit and better
localize losses inside of the collimation section several absorbers placed in the shadow of the primary collimators will be used .
the first arc will collimate transverse positions of incoming particles and the second , after a shift of vertical and horizontal betatron phases by odd multiples of @xmath6 , their transverse momenta .
the energy and vertical plane collimation will be done simultaneously , and therefore the ratio of dispersion to vertical betatron function at collimator locations has to be properly adjusted in order to achieve the required transverse and energy collimation depths . because , according to the optics design , dispersion can not be varied during machine operations , the rough preliminary adjustment was made already during design stage by appropriate selection of the arc parameters , and the operational flexibility will be provided by usage of collimators with exchangeable apertures and by tuning betatron functions at the collimator locations .
large beam spot size requested at the collimator locations and , in the same time , the possibility to transport bunches with different energies ( up to @xmath0 from nominal energy ) while preserving with good accuracy energy independent input and output matching conditions , make the control of chromatic effects one of the main issues in the design of the optics in the collimation section . without correction
the chromatic aberrations are unacceptable and , therefore , introduction of chromaticity correcting sextupoles becomes essential in improving overall system performance .
there are different approaches to the problem of compensation of chromatic effects , and the solution , which we found to be most adequate to the design requirements , is as follows : we compensate the arc chromatic effects by tuning arcs to become second - order achromats
. reduction of chromatic aberrations in the system straight sections is done for the particular betatron functions transported through these parts and without involving sextupole fields , simply by an accurate drift - quadrupole optics design ( a straight drift - quadrupole system can not be made an achromat , but it can be made a second - order apochromat with respect to certain incoming beam ellipses , i.e. it can transport these beam ellipses without introducing first - order chromatic distortions ) . , which are required to bring linear momentum compaction of the collimation section to @xmath7 ( red curve ) and to @xmath8 ( green curve).,width=283 ] in the first design , which is described in the tdr @xcite , the linear momentum compaction of the whole collimation system ( @xmath9 matrix coefficient ) was approximately equal to @xmath10 , which at that time was considered as acceptable value . in later studies of the microbunching instability it was found that even such a small value can not be neglected in the calculation of the gain of this instability and that , in order to reduce this gain , it is desirable to have @xmath11 of the collimation section equal to zero or , even better , to bring it to a positive value of about @xmath12 @xcite . because some other reasons for the choice of the linear momentum compaction could appear and the exact value of @xmath13 is not clear yet , we made system modifications in such a way , that though @xmath11 could not be varied dynamically during machine operations , the linear momentum compaction can be adjusted within about @xmath14 limits by system realignment while keeping space positions not only of the system end point and the system straight sections but also of the arc centers unchanged , as can be seen in fig . [ figdiffrefpath ] . the design which we describe in this paper ( *
baseline design * ) is the first - order isochronous beam line with @xmath15 . according to the system
design the arcs are tuned to become second - order achromats and this , together with the fixed system geometry and the requirement of the first - order isochronicity , completely determines the setting of the arc magnets and also the behavior of linear dispersion function .
thus the modifications of the betatron functions along the collimation section can be provided only by retuning of quadrupoles in the matching sections and in the phase shifter .
this is not a limitation in our case , because the design of these sections is done in such a way that with appropriate adjustment of their quadrupoles we are not only able to provide betatron functions of about @xmath16 at the points where the collimators are located ( * standard collimation optics * ) , but also able to translate smoothly the standard collimation optics into an optics with regular fodo - like transport through the entire collimation section .
this flexibility is an important property of the designed system and will be extensively used during machine commissioning and/or during measurements of beam parameters .
for example , commissioning starts with optics set to provide regular fodo - like transport and with sextupoles switched off and then , with experience gained , this optics can be translated step by step into the standard collimation optics .
betatron functions corresponding to the standard collimation optics can be seen in fig .
[ figbeta ] .
[ figdisp ] shows the linear dispersion , which is independent on setting of quadrupoles in the matching sections and in the phase shifter .
) along the collimation section .
beam energy 17.5 @xmath17 .
normalized emittances 1.4 @xmath18 .
red curve shows the design spot size ( linear theory ) .
all other curves are results extracted from the tracking simulations .
a matched gaussian beam at the entrance with @xmath19 ( blue ) and @xmath20 ( green ) energy offsets , with @xmath21 transverse offset ( black ) , and with both @xmath19 energy and @xmath21 offsets ( magenta ) .
sextupoles are switched on.,width=283 ] ellipses ( matched at the entrance ) after tracking through the entire collimation section .
the relative energy deviations are equal to @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath24 ( red , green and blue ellipses , respectively ) .
sextupoles are switched on.,width=283 ] the optics solution for the xfel post - linac collimation section described in this paper meets all design specifications .
it is capable of providing simultaneously a large beam spot size at the collimator locations ( fig .
[ figspots ] ) and , in the same time , to transport bunches with different energies ( up to @xmath0 from nominal energy ) while preserving with good accuracy energy independent input and output matching conditions ( fig .
[ figell ] ) .
these criteria are met by designing a magnetic system whose second - order chromatic and geometric aberrations are controlled by the symmetry of the first - order optics and sextupole fields .
the system uses four main primary collimators and the studies presented in @xcite show that these collimators are able to confine all particles which passed the collimation section freely ( without touching collimator apertures ) into a volume in the phase space , that can be safely transported through all downstream beamlines ( including undulator modules ) to the beam dumps . | post - linac collimation system should fulfill functions remove off - momentum large amplitude halo particles lost inside undulator modules source of radiation - demagnetization of undulator permanent magnets system protect undulator modules downstream equipment against miss - steered off - energy beams machine failure without collimation system designed passive collimators withstand direct impact of bunches delivered to locations until failure detected beam production rf switched off collimation section beam transport line from linac to undulator must meet tight performance specifications accept bunches with different energies ( up to @xmath0 from nominal energy ) transport without deterioration of transverse longitudinal beam parameters must be sufficiently achromatic sufficiently isochronous reduce jitter time of flight jitter fine - tune fel wavelength by changing electron beam energy without adjusting magnet strengths energy change of @xmath1 corresponds to @xmath2 change wavelength scan fel wavelength within bunch train by programming low level rf system requirements not problem find balance among competing factors system fulfills design goalslarge betatron functions needed at collimator locations survival during beam impacts lead to unacceptable chromatic aberrations chromaticity correcting sextupoles essential dependence optical parameters on energy deviation chromatic - aberration correction with sextupoles requires beamline with dispersion regulation of transverse energy collimation depths difficult reduces flexibility overview of optics solution fulfills requirements more details in @xcite beam transport from linac to undulator post - linac collimation section shown in fig . consists of two arcs separated by straight section phase shifter includes matching modules ends adapt optic beam behavior collimation section bends beam vertical length about @xmath3 outgoing beam axis points downward about @xmath4 vertical offset of is @xmath5 arcs identical second arc polarity of dipole sextupole magnets reversed dipole bending angles smaller net downward beam deflection each arc four @xmath6 cells second - order achromat first - order isochronous three types of collimators in post - linac collimation system main supplementing secondaryprincipal purpose main collimators intercept trajectories incoming particles outside downstream dynamic aperture collimators shade part beam pipe not all from uncontrolled beam impacts supplementing collimators assist reduce probability events supplementing affect transverse energy collimation depths main collimators improve cleaning efficiency at exit localize losses collimation section absorbers in shadow primary collimators used first arc transverse positions particles second after shift vertical horizontal betatron phases by multiples @xmath6 transverse momenta energy vertical plane collimation simultaneously ratio of dispersion to vertical betatron function adjusted achieve required transverse energy collimation depths dispersion not varied during machine operations preliminary adjustment made during design stage by selection arc parameters operational flexibility provided by collimators with exchangeable apertures tuning betatron functions at collimator locations large beam spot size possibility to transport bunches with different energies preserving energy independent input output matching conditions control of chromatic effects main issues in design optics collimation section without correction chromatic aberrations unacceptable introduction of chromaticity correcting sextupoles essential system performancedifferent approaches to compensation chromatic effects solution adequate to design requirements compensate arc chromatic effects by tuning arcs second - order achromats reduction of chromatic aberrations in system straight sections for betatron functions without sextupole fields by accurate drift - quadrupole optics design straight drift - quadrupole system not achromat second - order apochromat certain incoming beam ellipses transport without first chromatic distortions required to bring linear momentum compaction collimation section to @xmath7 and @xmath8 green first design linear momentum compaction of collimation system ( @xmath9 matrix coefficient equal to @xmath10 acceptable later studies microbunching instability small value can not be neglected in calculation gain instability to reduce gain desirable to have @xmath11 equal to zero or positive value of about @xmath12 @xcitereasons for linear momentum compaction could appear exact value of @xmath13 not clear made system modifications @xmath11 varied dynamically during operations linear momentum compaction adjusted within @xmath14 limits by system realignment keeping space positions system end point straight sections arc centers unchanged in fig . [ figdiffrefpath design baseline design is first - order isochronous beam line with @xmath15 arcs tuned to become second - order achromats fixed system geometry first - order isochronicity determines setting arc magnets behavior linear dispersion function modifications of betatron functions along collimation section by retuning quadrupoles in matching sections phase shifter not limitation design sections with adjustment of quadrupoles provide betatron functions of @xmath16 at points collimators translate optics into optics with regular fodo - like transport through collimation section flexibility important system used during machine commissioning measurements of beam parameters commissioning starts with optics set regular fodo - like transport sextupoles switched off experience translated into standard collimation optics betatron functions to standard collimation optics in fig . [ figbetafigdisp shows linear dispersion independent on setting quadrupoles matching sections phase shifter collimation section beam energy 17.5 @xmath17 normalized emittances 1.4 @xmath18 red curve shows design spot size linear theory other curves from tracking simulations matched gaussian beam at entrance with @xmath19 @xmath20 green energy offsets @xmath21 transverse offset offsets sextupoles switched on ellipses matched at entrance after tracking collimation section relative energy deviations equal to @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 red green blue ellipses sextupoles switched on optics solution for xfel post - linac collimation section meets design specifications large beam spot size collimator locations bunches with different energies energy independent input output matching conditions criteria met designing magnetic system second - chromatic geometric aberrations controlled by symmetry first order optics sextupole fieldssystem uses four collimators studies in @xcite show confine particles without apertures into volume in phase space safely transported through downstream beamlines including undulator modules to beam dumps | 0.431431 | 2,403 | 1,199 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,007 | graphs with large spectral gap are important in various fields such as biology , sociology and computer science . in designing such graphs ,
an important question is how the probability of graphs with large spectral gap behaves .
a method based on multicanonical monte carlo is introduced to quantify the behavior of this probability , which enables us to calculate extreme tails of the distribution .
the proposed method is successfully applied to random @xmath0-regular graphs and large deviation probability is estimated .
random graph ; spectral gap ; ramanujan graph ; multicanonical monte carlo ; large deviation | random graphs often appear and have been studied in various fields of natural science and engineering .
a recent interest in their applications is generating expander graphs @xcite , regular graphs that shows high connectivity and homogeneity .
such graphs have important applications in designing networks of computers @xcite , infrastructures @xcite , and real and artificial neurons @xcite .
a way to define and generate expanders is maximization of the spectral gap @xmath1 , which is defined as the difference between the largest eigenvalue and the second largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of a graph .
et al . _
@xcite numerically maximized the spectral gap by simulated annealing and generated examples of these graphs .
however , in designing networks , we are also interested in quantitative properties ; specifically how the probability of large spectral gap graphs behaves when the size @xmath2 of graphs increases . in this paper
we apply a method based on multicanonical monte carlo @xcite to the calculation of large deviations in the spectral gap of random graphs .
the method can be regarded as an extension of the method introduced in @xcite ; in @xcite , large deviations in the largest eigenvalue of random matrices are computed by a similar method .
multicanonical monte carlo enables us to estimate tails of the distribution whose probability is very small and can not be computed by naive random sampling . by using the proposed method
, we estimate the distribution of the spectral gap of random 3-regular graphs and quantify the probability @xmath3 that the spectral gap is larger than a given @xmath4 ; when @xmath5 , it is shown that @xmath6 for large @xmath2 .
an undirected graph is described by the corresponding adjacency matrix @xmath7 , whose entries are defined by @xmath8 here we denote eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix by @xmath9 . in the case of @xmath10-regular graphs
, @xmath7 has the trivial largest eigenvalue @xmath11 , therefore we assume @xmath12 the difference @xmath13 between the largest eigenvalue and the largest non - trivial eigenvalue of @xmath7 is called `` spectral gap '' and takes a non - zero value if the corresponding graph is connected .
we are interested in tails of the distribution of the spectral gap . in the case of regular graphs , alon and boppana ( see @xcite ) proved an asymptotic lower bound of the largest non - trivial eigenvalue @xmath14 as @xmath15 assuming that the limit exists , this gives an asymptotic upper bound for the spectral gap as @xmath16 .
graphs with @xmath17 are called `` ramanujan graphs '' @xcite . on the other hand ,
friedman @xcite proved that for @xmath18 and for any constant @xmath19 `` most '' random @xmath10-regular graphs have @xmath14 that satisfies @xmath20 as @xmath21 .
these results indicate that the peak of the distribution of @xmath22 is located near @xmath23 for large @xmath2 .
et al . _
@xcite studied the distribution around this peak using naive random sampling .
none of these studies , however , discusses extreme tails of the distribution of @xmath24 or @xmath1 , which is the main subject of this paper .
here , we will give a brief explanation of multicanonical monte carlo .
the aim of this method is to estimate the density of states @xmath25 defined by @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the dirac @xmath27-function and @xmath28 denotes a multiple integral in the space of matrix @xmath29 .
we define the weight by @xmath30 as a function of @xmath1 , a key quantity of this method .
when a weight function @xmath30 is given , we can generate samples from the distribution defined by the weight using the metropolis algorithm @xcite .
the essential idea is to tune the weight function @xmath30 so as to produce a flat histogram of @xmath1 .
after we find a appropriate weight function @xmath31 that gives a flat histogram , an approximate value of the density of states is estimated by @xmath32 . to obtain this @xmath31 , we modify the weight function step - by - step through the metropolis simulation using the current guess of the weight function @xmath30 .
there are several ways to modify the function @xmath30 . among them , a method proposed by wang and landau @xcite is most successful and used in this study . for a more accurate estimate of the density of states ,
we calculate a histogram @xmath33 by performing a long simulation with fixed @xmath31 .
then @xmath25 is estimated by @xmath34 and the probability distribution @xmath35 of @xmath1 is obtained by @xmath36 .
practically , we calculate the density @xmath35 only in a prescribed interval @xmath37 .
details of the implementation of the metropolis algorithm are as follows .
the simulation starts from an arbitrary @xmath10-regular graph with the desired number of vertices @xmath2 . in each step , a candidate @xmath38 is generated by rewiring edges in the way used in @xcite , where the degree @xmath10 of each vertex is not changed ; a pair of links @xmath39 and @xmath40 that satisfy @xmath41 is selected and rewired as @xmath42 .
then the spectral gap @xmath1 of a candidate is calculated by the householder method and accept / reject decision of the transition from the current state @xmath43 to @xmath38 is made by comparing the metropolis ratio @xmath44 with a random number uniformly distributed in @xmath45 $ ] . a candidate with @xmath46 , indicating a disconnected graph , is always rejected , hence an ensemble of connected random @xmath10-regular graphs is sampled .
of the spectral gap of random 3-regular graphs .
the density at @xmath1 plotted in the vertical axis is obtained from the probability in a small bin around @xmath1 of a fixed width ; the values of them depend on the bin width in the right tail of the distribution , because discreteness of the spectra becomes relevant there .
the arrows indicate @xmath47 ; graphs whose @xmath1 is above this value are ramanujan . ] using the proposed method , we estimate the distribution of the spectral gap of random 3-regular graphs with the number of vertices @xmath48 .
figure [ fig:1 ] shows graphs with the largest spectral gap for @xmath49 and @xmath50 found in the simulations . in figure [ fig:2 ] , we show @xmath35 of random 3-regular graphs with the number of vertices @xmath51 ; the computational time is 7 hours for @xmath52 and 251 hours for @xmath53 using a core of intel xeon x5365 . as @xmath2 increases
, the probability density becomes sharper and the peak becomes closer to around @xmath54 , which is consistent with a theoretical estimate @xcite and a numerical experiment @xcite .
specifically , the probability of graphs with large @xmath1 decreases drastically for large @xmath2 .
s are shown as functions of @xmath2 .
each curve corresponds to different values of @xmath4 .
data are well fitted by quadratic functions when @xmath5 . ] to quantify decreasing rate of the tails of the distribution , we define the probability @xmath55 that @xmath1 is larger than @xmath4 by @xmath56 here , we assume the probability @xmath57 is negligibly smaller than @xmath58 . in figure
[ fig:3 ] , estimated @xmath55s are shown as functions of @xmath2 .
for each @xmath4 , @xmath55 is well fitted by a quadratic functions of @xmath2 , when @xmath5 .
this result indicates that @xmath55 decreases for large @xmath2 as @xmath59 where the rate function @xmath60 is shown in figure [ fig:4 ] . in the region
@xmath61 , @xmath62 is no longer a monotonic decreasing function of @xmath2 and asymptotically approaches to unity for large @xmath2 .
is plotted .
the inset shows semi
log plot of @xmath60 . in the region
@xmath63 , @xmath60 exponentially increases as @xmath4 increases .
@xmath64 is the point that @xmath60 becomes negative . ]
a method based on multicanonical monte carlo is introduced to the estimation of large deviations in the spectral gap of random graphs . by using this method
, we calculate the distribution of the spectral gap @xmath1 and the probability @xmath62 for random 3-regular graphs .
while naive random sampling provides reasonable estimates of @xmath62 only when @xmath4 is around the peak of the distribution @xmath35 , the proposed method enables us to estimate @xmath62 in a wide region of @xmath4 including extreme tails of the distribution .
we find that @xmath62 behaves as @xmath65 for large @xmath2 , when @xmath5 .
our preliminary results indicate that a similar behavior is also seen in the case of random @xmath66- and @xmath67-regular graphs , suggesting that it is a general feature of random @xmath10-regular graphs .
the proposed method can be applied to calculations of large deviations in any statics of any ensemble of random graphs . in the case of non - regular graphs ,
the spectral gap are defined as the smallest non - trivial eigenvalue of the laplacian matrix @xmath68 @xcite ; hence we sample matrices @xmath68 instead of @xmath29 by using multicanonical monte carlo .
recent studies on gaussian or wishart random matrices @xcite showed that the probability of all eigenvalues being negative decreases as @xmath69 when the size @xmath2 of the matrices is large .
our results are regarded as an extension of these results to the spectral gap of random graphs .
we thank prof . m. kikuchi for his support and encouragement . this work is supported in part by global coe program ( core research and engineering of advanced materials - interdisciplinary education center for materials science ) ,
mext , japan .
all simulations were performed on a pc cluster at cybermedia center , osaka university . | random graphs studied in natural science engineering recent interest generating expander graphs high connectivity homogeneity graphs in designing networks computers infrastructures real artificial neurons define generate expanders maximization spectral gap @xmath1 difference between largest second largest eigenvalue of adjacency matrix graph maximized spectral gap by simulated annealing generated examples graphs designing networks interested in quantitative properties probability of large spectral gap graphs when size increases paper method multicanonical monte carlo @xcite to calculation large deviations in spectral gap of random graphs method extension of method @xcite large deviations in largest eigenvalue of random matrices computed by similar method multicanonical monte carlo estimate distribution probability small by naive random sampling proposed method estimate distribution spectral gap of random 3-regular graphs quantify probability spectral gap larger than @xmath4 large undirected graph described by adjacency matrix @xmath7 entries defined by @xmath8 denote eigenvalues adjacency matrix by @xmath9@xmath10-regular graphs @xmath7 has largest eigenvalue @xmath11 assume @xmath12 difference @xmath13 between largest non - trivial eigenvalue @xmath7 spectral gap non - zero if graph connected interested in distribution spectral gap regular graphs alon boppana proved asymptotic lower bound largest non - trivial eigenvalue @xmath14 as @xmath15 limit asymptotic upper bound spectral gap @xmath16 @xmath17 ramanujan graphs friedman @xcite proved @xmath18 @xmath19 random @xmath10-regular graphs have @xmath14 satisfies @xmath20 as @xmath21 peak distribution @xmath22 near @xmath23 @xmath2 studied distribution peak naive random sampling discusses extreme tails distribution @xmath24 or @xmath1 main subject explanation multicanonical monte carlo estimate density of states @xmath25 defined by @xmath26 @xmath27 dirac @xmath27-function @xmath28 multiple integral matrix @xmath29 weight by @xmath30 function of @xmath1 key quantityweight function @xmath30 given generate samples distribution using metropolis algorithm @xcite tune weight function produce flat histogram @xmath1 appropriate weight function @xmath31 flat histogram approximate density of states estimated by @xmath32 obtain modify weight function metropolis simulation using current guess @xmath30 several ways modify method proposed by wang and landau @xcite successful accurate estimate density calculate histogram @xmath33 long simulation with fixed @xmath31 @xmath25 estimated by @xmath34 probability distribution @xmath35 @xmath1 obtained by @xmath36 calculate density @xmath35 in prescribed interval @xmath37 metropolis algorithm simulation starts from arbitrary @xmath10-regular graph desired number vertices @xmath2 candidate @xmath38 generated by rewiring edges degree vertex links @xmath39 and @xmath40 satisfy @xmath41 selected rewired as @xmath42 spectral gap @xmath1 of candidate calculated by householder method / transition from state @xmath43 to @xmath38 comparing metropolis ratio @xmath44 with random number distributed in @xmath45candidate @xmath46 disconnected graph rejected connected @xmath10-regular graphs sampled spectral gap 3-regular graphs density at @xmath1 from probability small bin around @xmath1 fixed width values depend on bin width right tail discreteness arrows indicate @xmath47 graphs @xmath1 above ramanujan proposed method estimate distribution spectral gap 3-regular graphs vertices @xmath48 shows largest spectral gap @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath35 3-regular graphs vertices @xmath51 computational time 7 hours for @xmath52 251 hours @xmath53 intel xeon x5365 @xmath2 increases probability density sharper peak closer around @xmath54 consistent with theoretical estimate @xcite numerical experiment probability of large @xmath1 decreases for large @xmath2 functions @xmath2 curve corresponds different values @xmath4 data fitted by quadratic functions @xmath5 quantify decreasing rate tails distribution define probability @xmath55 @xmath1 larger than @xmath4 @xmath56 probability @xmath57 negligibly smaller than @xmath58figure:3 estimated @xmath55s functions @xmath2 each @xmath4 @xmath55 fitted by functions @xmath2 @xmath55 decreases large @xmath2 as @xmath59 rate function @xmath60 shown figure fig:4 region @xmath61 @xmath62 decreasing function @xmath2 approaches unity for large @xmath2 semi log plot @xmath60 region @xmath63 @xmath60 increases as @xmath4 increases @xmath64 @xmath60 becomes negative method multicanonical monte carlo introduced estimation large deviations spectral gap random graphs distribution spectral gap @xmath1 probability @xmath62 for random 3-regular graphs sampling estimates @xmath62 @xmath4 peak distribution @xmath35 proposed method @xmath62 wide region @xmath4 extreme tails distribution @xmath62 behaves as @xmath65 for large @xmath2 @xmath5 similar behavior random @xmath66- @xmath67-regular graphs general feature of random @xmath10-regular graphs proposed method large deviations random graphsnon - regular graphs spectral gap smallest non - trivial eigenvalue laplacian matrix @xmath68 @xcite sample matrices @xmath68 @xmath29 multicanonical monte carlo studies gaussian wishart random matrices @xcite probability eigenvalues negative decreases as @xmath69 size @xmath2 large results extension spectral gap random graphs thank prof . m. kikuchi support work supported by global coe program materials mext japan simulations pc cluster cybermedia center osaka university | 0.348297 | 2,275 | 1,205 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,009 | in this note we show that there are 4-manifolds not containing gompf nucleus @xmath0 ; in this way we answer problem 4.98 of kirby s problem list ( see @xcite ) in the negative .
[ section ] [ fact]lemma [ fact]theorem [ fact]definition [ fact]remark [ fact]proposition # 1#2 # 1 _ # 1 .
_ # 1 _ # 1 .
_ = cmr7 = msbm10 at 11pt = msbm7 at 9pt = msbm5 at 7pt = = = # 1#1 o # 1#2 | this note is devoted to answer a question in kirby s problem list @xcite asking whether every simply connected smooth 4-manifold with @xmath1 contains a gompf nucleus @xmath0 ( problem 4.98 in @xcite ) .
we prove that by doing logarithmic transformations on three linearly independent tori in the _
k3_-surface we get a 4-manifold not contaning @xmath0 . to make our statements more precise we need a few definitions .
the hypersurface @xmath2\in { { \bbb { cp}}}^3\ \vert \ \sum _ { i=0 } ^3 z_i ^4=0\rbrace \subset { { \bbb { cp}}}^3 $ ] is a simply connected , smooth 4-manifold with @xmath3 , hence it is a _
k3-surface_. it is known that all simply connected complex surfaces with vanishing first chern class are diffeomorphic , consequently from the differential topological point of view @xmath4 is _ the k3_-surface .
the complex surface @xmath4 admits a holomorphic fibration @xmath5 such that the generic fiber is a smooth elliptic curve a 2-dimensional torus .
such fibrations are called _
elliptic fibrations_. it can be assumed that @xmath6 has a singular fiber homeomorphic to the 2-dimensional sphere @xmath7 such fibers are called _
cusp fibers_. the fibration also has a section @xmath8 , the image of which is a sphere @xmath9 with square @xmath10 ^ 2=-2 $ ] .
the _ gompf nucleus _
@xmath0 is by definition the tubular neighborhood of the union of a cusp fiber and a section in @xmath4 .
the manifold @xmath0 admits a handle decomposition with one 0-handle and two 2-handles , where these two 2-handles are attached to @xmath11 according to the kirby diagram shown in figure [ egyes ] . it can be shown that the _ k3_-surface @xmath4 contains three disjoint copies of @xmath0 .
if a 4-manifold @xmath12 contains a 2-dimensional torus @xmath13 with square 0 , then we can perform a _ logarithmic transformation _ on @xmath13 : deleting the tubular neighborhood of @xmath13 ( which is diffeomorphic to @xmath14 ) and regluing it via a diffeomorphism @xmath15 we get a new manifold @xmath16 .
it turnes out that if @xmath13 is the fiber in a gompf nucleus @xmath17 , then the diffeomorphism type of @xmath16 will depend only on one nonnegative number @xmath18 associated to @xmath19 .
this number is called the _ multiplicity _ of the logarithmic transformation . for more about elliptic surfaces , nuclei and logarithmic transformations
see @xcite , @xcite and @xcite .
now perform logarithmic transformations of multiplicity 2 on the three tori contained by the three disjoint nuclei in the _ k3_-surface @xmath4 .
the resulting manifold will be denoted by @xmath20 .
the 4-manifold @xmath20 does not contain a gompf nucleus @xmath0 .
[ elsotetel ] one of the most interesting questions in 4-manifold theory is whether all 4-manifolds are of simple type or not .
( for the definition of simple type see section [ masodik ] . )
it is known that if @xmath12 contains a homologically essential torus with square 0 , then @xmath21 is of simple type .
there is no example of a 4-manifold with @xmath1 and not containing a torus with square 0 .
one can ask whether every 4-manifold contains a cusp neeighborhood ( a tubular neighborhood of a cusp fiber ) or even a gompf nucleus @xmath0 .
the above theorem shows an example of a manifold which contains no @xmath0 ; @xmath20 is still of simple type , however .
one can modify the question by trying to find more general nuclei @xmath22 in 4-manifolds .
the manifold @xmath22 is described by the kirby diagram shown in figure [ kettes ] it can be defined alternatively as the tubular neighborhhod of the union of a cups fiber and a section in a simply connected elliptic surface ( admitting a section ) with euler characteristic @xmath23 ( see @xcite ) . for every @xmath24
there is a manifold @xmath25 such that @xmath25 does not contain @xmath22 .
[ masodiktetel ] a related question would be to find a 4-manifold @xmath21 with the property that @xmath21 does not contain @xmath26 ; here @xmath26 denotes the 4-manifold with boundary we get by performing two logarithmic transformations ( of multiplicity @xmath18 and @xmath27 ) along the fiber of the gompf nucleus @xmath0 .
using a recent construction of fintushel and stern @xcite such @xmath21 can be found , see @xcite .
_ acknowledgement _ : the author would like to thank msri for their hospitality and support , and zoltn szab for many helpful conversations .
in studying differential topological properties of smooth 4-manifolds , _ seiberg - witten basic classes _ turn out to be very powerful tools . for the definition of these objects see @xcite , @xcite or @xcite , here we restrict ourselves to a very short outline .
assume that @xmath12 is a smooth , oriented , simply connected , closed 4-manifold with @xmath28 .
a cohomology class @xmath29 with @xmath30 uniquely determines a spin@xmath31 structure on @xmath21 , and for such a structure a certain pair of partial differential equations ( the so - called seiberg - witten equations ) can be described involving a choice of metric on @xmath21 , a coupled dirac operator and a perturbation 2-form . by a delicate `` counting argument '' of the solutions of these equations
a number @xmath32 can be associated to the cohomology class @xmath33 .
it turnes out that this number ( up to sign ) is a smooth invariant of the manifold @xmath21 , more precisely if @xmath34 is an orientation preserving diffeomorphism then @xmath35 .
moreover , for a fixed 4-manifold @xmath21 there are only finitely many classes @xmath33 with @xmath36 , and @xmath37 . the cohomology class @xmath38 is called a _ seiberg - witten basic class _ if @xmath36 .
the 4-manifold @xmath21 is of simple type if @xmath36 implies that @xmath39 ; here @xmath40 and @xmath41 stand for the signature and euler characteristic of @xmath21 .
the most important relation between the smooth topology of a 4-manifold @xmath21 and its basic classes @xmath42 is shown by the _ generalized adjunction formula _ : ( kronheimer - mrowka ) if @xmath43 is a smooth , connected 2-dimensional surface of genus @xmath44 , @xmath45\neq 0 $ ] and @xmath45 ^ 2\geq 0 $ ] , then for every basic class @xmath33 we have @xmath46 ^ 2+\vert k([\sigma ] ) \vert .\ ] ]
assume that @xmath47 and @xmath48 are three tori in the _
k3_-surface lying in three disjoint gompf nuclei .
perform logarithmic transformations of multiplicity 2 on each @xmath49 .
the basic classes of the resulting manifold @xmath20 are determined by fintushel and stern @xcite .
_ of theorem [ elsotetel ] : _ assume that @xmath51
. the homology class of the fiber and the section in @xmath0 will be denoted by @xmath52 and @xmath53 respectively ; note that @xmath52 and @xmath54 have square 0 and can be represented by tori .
consequently ( by the generalized adjunction formula ) a basic class @xmath33 of @xmath20 evaluates trivially on @xmath52 and @xmath55 .
now @xmath56 + [ { { t_j}\over 2}]+ [ { { t_k}\over 2}])=0 $ ] and @xmath57 + [ { { t_j}\over 2}]+ [ { { t_k}\over 2}])0 $ ] ( @xmath58 ) implies that @xmath59=0 $ ] , similarly @xmath60 = 0 $ ] for @xmath61 . since the complement of the three disjoint nuclei in @xmath4 have negative definite intersection form , the above equalities imply that @xmath62 $ ] and similarly @xmath63 $ ] .
these two latter equations , however , give a contradiction , since @xmath64 but @xmath65)\cdot ( \sum _ { i=1 } ^3 \beta _ j [ t_j])=0 $ ] .
consequently @xmath0 does not embed in @xmath20 .
_ of theorem [ masodiktetel ] : _ perform logarithmic transsformations of multiplicity @xmath66 on @xmath47 and @xmath48 as above ; the resulting 4-manifold @xmath67 will be denoted by @xmath25 .
the basic classes of @xmath25 are determined in @xcite : these are the poincar duals of the homology classes @xmath68+\beta [ { { t_2}\over { 2n}}]+ \gamma [ { { t_3}\over { 2n}}]$ ] where @xmath69 .
assume now that @xmath70 .
as before , @xmath52 and @xmath53 will denote the homology classes of the fiber and the section in @xmath22 respectively .
note that @xmath71 and @xmath72 .
the class @xmath52 can be represented by a torus , while @xmath73 can be represented by a surface of genus @xmath24 ; moreover @xmath74 .
the same argument as in the proof of theorem [ elsotetel ] gives that @xmath62 $ ] . to show that every basic class of @xmath25 evaluates trivially on @xmath55
involves a little trick : take the basic classes @xmath50\pm [ { { t_2}\over 2}]\pm [ { { t_3}\over 2}]$ ] and evaluate them on @xmath55 . if one of them , say @xmath33 , evaluates nontrivially on @xmath55 , then for @xmath75 ( which is also a basic class ) we have @xmath76 , but then @xmath77 and @xmath55 would violate the generalized adjunction formula .
consequently @xmath78\pm [ { { t_2}\over 2}]\pm [ { { t_3}\over 2}])\cdot g=0 $ ] implying that @xmath79=0 $ ] @xmath80 .
these latter equations show that @xmath81 $ ] , and we have the same contradiction as before . | note devoted question kirby s problem list @xcite connected 4-manifold with @xmath1 contains gompf nucleus @xmath0 problem 4.98 prove logarithmic transformations on three independent tori in k3_-surface 4-manifold not contaning @xmath0 need definitions hypersurface @xmath2 is connected smooth 4-manifold with @xmath3 k3-surface_ connected complex surfaces with vanishing first chern class diffeomorphic @xmath4 is k3_-surface complex surface @xmath4 admits holomorphic fibration @xmath5 generic fiber smooth elliptic curve 2-dimensional torus elliptic fibrations_ @xmath6 has singular fiber homeomorphic to 2-dimensional sphere @xmath7 fibers cusp fibers_ fibration has section @xmath8 image sphere @xmath9 with @xmath10 gompf nucleus @xmath0 is tubular neighborhood of union cusp fiber and section in @xmath4 manifold @xmath0 admits handle decomposition with one 0-handle two 2-handles attached to @xmath11 kirby diagram figure [k3-surface @xmath4 contains three copies @xmath0 4-manifold @xmath12 contains 2-dimensional torus @xmath13 with square 0 perform logarithmic transformation on @xmath13 deleting tubular neighborhood @xmath13 diffeomorphic to @xmath14 via diffeomorphism @xmath15 new manifold @xmath16 if @xmath13 is fiber in gompf nucleus @xmath17 diffeomorphism @xmath16 on one nonnegative number @xmath18 to @xmath19 number multiplicity of logarithmic transformation perform logarithmic transformations of multiplicity 2 on three tori nuclei in k3-surface @xmath4 resulting manifold denoted by @xmath20 4-manifold @xmath20 gompf nucleus @xmath0 4-manifold theory all 4-manifolds simple type if @xmath12 contains homologically essential torus with square 0 @xmath21 simple type no example 4-manifold with @xmath1 not torus with square 0 every 4-manifold contains cusp neeighborhood or gompf nucleus @xmath0 theorem shows example manifold no @xmath0 ; @xmath20 still simple typemodify question general nuclei @xmath22 in 4-manifolds manifold @xmath22 described kirby diagram figure defined tubular neighborhhod of union cups fiber section connected elliptic surface with euler characteristic @xmath23 see @xcite @xmath24 manifold @xmath25 contain @xmath22 related question find 4-manifold @xmath21 contain @xmath26 @xmath26 denotes 4-manifold with boundary performing two logarithmic transformations @xmath18 and @xmath27 along fiber gompf nucleus @xmath0 recent construction fintushel stern @xcite @xmath21 found see @xcite author msri zoltn szab conversations studying differential topological properties of smooth 4-manifolds seiberg - witten basic classes powerful tools definition see @xcite short outline assume @xmath12 smooth oriented connected closed 4-manifold with @xmath28 cohomology class @xmath29 with @xmath30 determines spin@xmath31 structure on @xmath21 partial differential equations seiberg - witten equations described choice of metric on @xmath21 coupled dirac operator perturbation 2-form counting argument number @xmath32 cohomology class @xmath33 number smooth invariant of manifold @xmath21 @xmath34 orientation preserving diffeomorphism @xmath35 fixed 4-manifold @xmath21 classes @xmath33 @xmath36 @xmath37 cohomology class @xmath38 seiberg - witten basic class @xmath36 4-manifold @xmath21 simple type @xmath36 implies @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 signature euler characteristic @xmath21 relation between smooth topology 4-manifold @xmath21 basic classes @xmath42 shown generalized adjunction formula kronheimer @xmath43 smooth connected 2-dimensional surface genus @xmath44 @xmath45 every basic class @xmath33 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 three tori k3-surface three disjoint gompf nuclei logarithmic transformations multiplicity 2 on each @xmath49 basic classes manifold @xmath20 determined by fintushel stern @xcite assume @xmath51 homology class fiber section @xmath0 denoted by @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath52 @xmath54 have square 0 represented by tori generalized adjunction formula basic class @xmath33 @xmath20 evaluates on @xmath52 @xmath55 @xmath56 + 2+)=0 $ @xmath57 ++)0 $ @xmath58 implies @xmath59=0 $ @xmath60 = 0 $ @xmath61 three nuclei @xmath4 negative intersection form equalities imply @xmath62 $ @xmath63 $ ] equations contradiction @xmath64 @xmath65)\cdot)=0 $ ] @xmath0 embed in @xmath20 logarithmic transsformations multiplicity @xmath66 on @xmath47 @xmath48 resulting 4-manifold @xmath67 denoted by @xmath25 basic classes @xmath25 determined in @xcite poincar duals of homology classes @xmath68+\beta [ t_2} 2n}}]+ \gamma t_3}\over 2n}}]$ ] @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath52 @xmath53 denote homology classes fiber section in @xmath22 @xmath71 @xmath72 .class @xmath52 represented by torus @xmath73 by surface genus @xmath24 ; @xmath74 same argument proof theorem elsotetel gives @xmath62 $ ] basic class @xmath25 evaluates trivially on @xmath55 trick basic classes @xmath50 evaluate on @xmath55 if one @xmath33 evaluates nontrivially on @xmath55 for @xmath75 basic class @xmath76 @xmath77 and @xmath55 violate generalized adjunction formula @xmath78 g=0 $ ] @xmath79=0 $ ] @xmath80 equations show @xmath81 $ ] same contradiction before | 0.350158 | 2,523 | 1,382 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,017 | we show that any open subset of a contact manifold of dimension greater than three contains a certain hypersurface @xmath0 which violates the thurston - bennequin inequality .
we also show that no convex hypersurface smoothly approximates @xmath0 .
these results contrasts with the @xmath1-dimensional case , where any surface in a small ball satisfies the inequality ( bennequin@xcite ) and is smoothly approximated by a convex one ( giroux@xcite ) . | tightness is a fundamental notion in @xmath1-dimensional contact topology .
it is characterized by the thurston - bennequin inequality ( see 1.1 ) .
roughly , for a seifert ( hyper)surface @xmath0 in a contact manifold , this inequality compares the contact structure along @xmath0 with the tangent bundle of @xmath0 by means of relative euler number .
an overtwisted disk is a @xmath2-disk equipped with a certain germ of @xmath1-dimensional contact structure , for which the inequality fails .
a contact manifold is said to be tight if it contains no embedded overtwisted disks .
then the inequality automatically holds for any @xmath0 ( eliashberg@xcite ) .
the @xmath3-jet space @xmath4 for a function @xmath5 is tight ( bennequin@xcite ) .
thus all contact @xmath1-manifolds , which are modelled on @xmath4 , are locally tight . giroux@xcite smoothly approximated a given compact surface in a contact @xmath1-manifold by a surface with certain transverse monotonicity , i.e. , a convex surface ( see 1.2 for the precise definition ) .
thus , in @xmath1-dimensional case , we may easily consider that the above inequality is only for convex surfaces .
contrastingly , in higher dimension , we show the following theorem . in the case where @xmath6 , any open subset of the @xmath3-jet space @xmath7 , which is the model space for contact @xmath8-manifolds , contains a hypersurface @xmath0 such that 1 .
@xmath0 violates the thurston - bennequin inequality , and 2 .
no convex hypersurface smoothly approximates @xmath0 .
this leads us to seriously restrict the inequality to convex hypersurfaces ( see @xcite for a sequel ) .
let @xmath0 be a compact oriented hypersurface embedded in a positive contact manifold @xmath9 @xmath10 which tangents to the contact structure @xmath11 at finite number of interior points .
let @xmath12 ( resp .
@xmath13 ) denote the set of positive ( resp .
negative ) tangent points . with respect to the symplectic structure @xmath14
, the symplectic orthogonal of @xmath15 defines a singular line field @xmath16 .
the integral foliation @xmath17 of @xmath18 on @xmath0 is called the
_ characteristic foliation_. the singularity of @xmath18 coincides with @xmath19 .
the restriction @xmath20 defines a holonomy invariant transverse contact structure of @xmath21 and determines the orientation of @xmath18 ( i.e. , @xmath22 ) .
we define the index @xmath23 of each tangent point @xmath24 by regarding it as a singular point of @xmath18 .
assume that the boundary of each connected component of @xmath0 is non - empty and @xmath18 is outwards transverse to @xmath25 .
then the boundary @xmath26 is said to be _ contact - type_. the unit @xmath2-disk @xmath27 equipped with the germ of contact structure @xmath28 is called an ( the ) overtwisted disk , where @xmath29 is the cylindrical coordinates of @xmath30 . slightly extending @xmath27 , we obtain a disk with contact - type boundary such that the singularity of the characteristic foliation is a single negative sink point .
a contact @xmath1-manifold is said to be _ overtwisted _ or _ tight _ depending on whether it contains an embedded overtwisted disk ( with the same germ as above ) or not .
let @xmath0 be _ any _ surface with contact - type boundary embedded in the @xmath3-jet space @xmath31 equipped with the canonical contact form .
then bennequin@xcite proved the following inequality which immediately implies the tightness of @xmath4 : @xmath32 eliashberg proved the same inequality for symplectically fillable contact @xmath1-manifolds ( @xcite ) , and finally for all tight contact @xmath1-manifolds ( @xcite ) .
the inequality can be written in terms of relative euler number .
let @xmath33 be the above vector field on a hypersurface @xmath34 with contact - type boundary . then , since @xmath35 , we can regard @xmath33 as a section of @xmath36 which is canonical near the boundary @xmath25 .
thus we can define the relative eular number of @xmath36 by @xmath37\rangle = \sum_{p\in s_+(\sigma)}\mathrm{ind}\,p-\sum_{p\in s_-(\sigma)}\mathrm{ind}\,p.\ ] ] then the thurston - bennequin inequality may be expressed as @xmath38\rangle \leq -\chi(\sigma).\ ] ] there is also an absolute version of the thurston - bennequin inequality which is expressed as @xmath39\rangle|\leq -\chi(\sigma)$ ] , or equivalently @xmath40 for any closed hypersurface @xmath0 with @xmath41 .
this holds if the euler class @xmath42 is a torsion , especially if @xmath43 .
note that the inequality and its absolute version can be defined for any oriented plane field on @xmath44 ( see eliashberg - thurston@xcite ) .
they are originally proved for codimension @xmath3 foliations on @xmath44 without reeb components by thurston ( see @xcite ) .
a vector field @xmath33 on @xmath9 is said to be _ contact _ if the lie derivative @xmath45 vanishes on @xmath11 .
let @xmath46 denote the space of contact vector fields on @xmath9 .
we can see that the linear map @xmath47 is an isomorphism .
the function @xmath48 is called the contact hamiltonian function of @xmath33 .
a closed oriented hypersurface @xmath49 is said to be _ convex _ if there exists a contact vector field @xmath50 on a neighbourhood @xmath51 of @xmath52 with @xmath53 ( @xmath54 ) , i.e. , @xmath50 is positively transverse to @xmath0 ( giroux@xcite ) . by perturbing the contact hamiltonian function if necessary
, we may assume that @xmath55 is a hypersurface transverse to @xmath0 .
then @xmath56 separates @xmath0 into the _ positive region _
@xmath57 and the _ negative region _
@xmath58 so that @xmath59 .
each interior @xmath60 has the positive exact symplectic form @xmath61 .
we can modify the function @xmath62 near @xmath56 to obtain a function @xmath63 such that @xmath64 are symplectic and @xmath65 is @xmath50-invariant .
( this is the `` transverse monotonicity '' of @xmath0 . )
note that the dividing set @xmath66 is then the convex ends of the exact symplectic manifolds @xmath60 .
a _ convex hypersurface with contact - type boundary _ is a connected hypersurface @xmath0 which admits a transverse contact vector field @xmath33 such that , for the associated decomposition @xmath59 , @xmath60 are also convex exact symplectic manifolds , and the contact - type boundary @xmath67 is non - empty .
( changing @xmath33 if necessary , we can assume moreover that the dividing set @xmath66 contains @xmath25 . )
then the thurston - bennequin inequality can be expressed as follows .
@xmath68 slightly extending the overtwisted disk @xmath27 , we obtain a convex disk @xmath0 which is the union @xmath69 of a disk @xmath70 and an annulus @xmath71 surrounding @xmath70 .
then @xmath0 violates the thurston - bennequin inequality ( @xmath72 ) , and is called a convex overtwisted disk .
a possible higher dimensional overtwisted convex hypersurface @xmath0 would also satisfy @xmath73 and @xmath74 .
particularly @xmath75 would have to be disconnected ( see @xcite ) .
we show the following proposition .
let @xmath76 be an overtwisted contact @xmath1-manifold and @xmath77 the @xmath78-ball in @xmath79 @xmath80 . then there exist a closed hypersurface @xmath81 and a hypersurface @xmath0 with contact - type boundary in the product contact @xmath8-manifold @xmath82 such that @xmath81 and @xmath0 are not convex , @xmath83 , and @xmath0 violates the thurston - bennequin inequality , where @xmath84 denotes the natural projection to @xmath44 .
let @xmath29 be the cylindrical coordinates of @xmath85 , and consider the functions @xmath86 then we see that the contact structure on @xmath85 defined by the contact form @xmath87 is overtwisted .
an overtwisted disk in @xmath76 has a neighbourhood which is contactomorphic to @xmath88 .
thus , by using the formula @xmath89 we can replace @xmath90 in proposition with @xmath91 .
then we take the hypersurface @xmath92 and its subset @xmath93 we orient @xmath81 so that the characteristic foliation @xmath94 is presented by the vector field @xmath95 indeed the following calculations shows that the vector field @xmath33 satisfies @xmath96 , @xmath97 , and @xmath98 .
@xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath103 we see that the vector field @xmath33 also satisfies @xmath104 with attention to @xmath105 .
thus @xmath26 is contact - type .
the singularity of @xmath106 is the union of @xmath107 and @xmath108 they are respectively a source point and a sink point ( see figure 1 ) . precisely , figure 1 depicts ( the fourfold covering of ) the well - defined push - forward @xmath110 of @xmath33 under the natural projection @xmath111 from @xmath81 to the quarter - sphere @xmath112 the vector field @xmath110 defines the singular foliation @xmath113 .
the singularity consists of the following five points ; two ( quarter-)elliptic points @xmath114 whose preimages under @xmath111 are the above singular points ; other two ( half-)elliptic points @xmath115 whose preimages are the periodic orbits @xmath116 of @xmath33 @xmath117 ; and a hyperbolic point @xmath118 , which is the self - intersection of the leaf corresponding to @xmath119 . slightly changing @xmath78 if necessary , we may assume that the preimage @xmath120 of the hyperbolic singular point of @xmath110 is a union of periodic orbits of @xmath33 .
now we assume that @xmath81 is ( approximately ) convex in order to prove proposition by contradiction .
the assumption implies @xmath121 where @xmath122 are the @xmath123 regions of the convex surface @xmath81 devided by the transverse intersection with the level set @xmath56 of the contact hamiltonian function described in 1.2
. then we can see that the intersection @xmath124 contain a spherical component .
however the eliashberg - floer - mcduff theorem implies that @xmath125(other components ) can not be realized as the boundary of a connected convex symplectic manifold ( see mcduff@xcite ) .
this contradiction proves proposition .
here we omit a similar proof of the non - convexity of the seifert hypersurface @xmath0 .
aaa d. bennequin : _ entrelacements et quations de pfaff _ , astrisque , * 107 - 108 * ( 1983 ) , 83161 .
y. eliashberg : _ filling by holomorphic discs and its applications _ , geometry of low - dimensional manifolds 2 , london math .
note ser . *
151*(1990 ) , 4572 .
y. eliashberg : _
contact 3-manifolds twenty years since j. martinet s work _
fourier , grenoble , * 42 * ( 1991 ) , 165192 .
y. eliashberg and w. thurston : _ confoliations _ ,
a.m.s . university lecture series , * 13 * ( 1998 ) . e.
giroux : _ convexit en topologie de contact _ , comm .
* 66 * ( 1991 ) , 637677 .
d. mcduff : _ symplectic manifolds with contact type boundaries _ , invent . math . * 103*(1991 ) , 651671 .
a. mori : _ reeb foliations on @xmath128 and contact @xmath129-manifolds violating the thurston - bennequin inequality _
, preprint ( 2009 ) , arxiv:0906.3237 .
a. mori : _ the reeb foliation arises as a family of legendrian submanifolds at the end of a deformation of the standard @xmath126 in @xmath128 _ , preprint ( 2011 ) . w. thurston : _ norm on the homology of @xmath1-manifolds _ , memoirs of the ams , * 339 * ( 1986 ) , 99130 . | tightness fundamental in @xmath1-dimensional contact topology characterized by thurston - bennequin inequality see 1.1 ) for)surface @xmath0 in contact manifold inequality compares contact structure with tangent bundle relative euler number overtwisted disk is @xmath2-disk contact structure inequality fails contact manifold tight if no overtwisted disks inequality holds for any @xmath0 @xmath3-jet space @xmath4 for function @xmath5 is tight ( all contact @xmath1-manifolds modelled on @xmath4 are locally tight giroux@xcite approximated compact surface in by convex surface see 1.2 for definition inequality only for convex surfaces higher dimension theorem @xmath6 open subset of @xmath3-jet space @xmath7 model space for contact @xmath8-manifolds contains hypersurface @xmath0 violates thurston - bennequin inequality no convex hypersurface approximates @xmath0 restrict inequality to convex hypersurfaces see @xcite sequel@xmath0 compact hypersurface positive contact manifold @xmath9 tangents contact structure @xmath11 finite interior points @xmath12 @xmath13 positive negative tangent points symplectic structure @xmath14 orthogonal @xmath15 defines singular line field @xmath16 integral foliation @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath0 characteristic foliation singularity @xmath18 coincides with @xmath19 restriction @xmath20 defines holonomy invariant transverse contact structure @xmath21 orientation @xmath18 index @xmath23 tangent point @xmath24 singular point @xmath18 boundary component @xmath0 non - empty @xmath18 outwards transverse @xmath25 boundary @xmath26 contact - type @xmath2-disk @xmath27 contact structure @xmath28 overtwisted disk @xmath29 cylindrical coordinates @xmath30 extending @xmath27 disk contact - type boundary singularity characteristic foliation single negative sink point contact @xmath1-manifold overtwisted tight embedded overtwisted disk @xmath0 surface contact - type boundary @xmath3-jet space @xmath31 canonical contact formbennequin@xcite proved inequality tightness @xmath4 @xmath32 eliashberg proved inequality fillable contact @xmath1-manifolds tight contact @xmath1-manifolds inequality relative euler number @xmath33 vector field on hypersurface @xmath34 with contact - type boundary @xmath33 section of @xmath36 near boundary @xmath25 define relative eular number @xmath36 by @xmath37\rangle = thurston - bennequin inequality expressed as @xmath38\rangle \leq -\chi(\sigma). absolute version inequality expressed @xmath39\rangle\leq -\chi(\sigma @xmath40 closed hypersurface @xmath0 with @xmath41 holds if euler class @xmath42 torsion @xmath43 inequality absolute version defined oriented plane field on @xmath44 proved codimension @xmath3 foliations on @xmath44 without reeb components vector field @xmath33 on @xmath9 contact if derivative @xmath45 vanishes on @xmath11 @xmath46 contact vector fields @xmath9 linear map @xmath47 isomorphism function @xmath48 contact hamiltonian function @xmath33 closed hypersurface @xmath49 convex contact vector field @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath50 transverse @xmath0 perturbing hamiltonian @xmath55 hypersurface transverse @xmath0 @xmath56 separates @xmath0 positive region @xmath57 negative region @xmath58 interior @xmath60 positive symplectic form @xmath61 modify function @xmath62 @xmath56 @xmath63 @xmath64 symplectic @xmath65 @xmath50-invariant transverse monotonicity @xmath0 dividing set @xmath66 convex ends symplectic manifolds @xmath60 convex hypersurface contact - type boundary connected hypersurface @xmath0 transverse contact vector field @xmath33 @xmath59 @xmath60 convex symplectic manifolds contact - type boundary @xmath67 non - empty changing @xmath33 dividing set @xmath66 contains @xmath25 thurston - bennequin inequalityextending overtwisted disk @xmath27 convex disk @xmath0 union disk @xmath70 annulus @xmath71 surrounding @xmath0 violates thurston - bennequin inequality convex overtwisted disk higher dimensional overtwisted convex hypersurface @xmath0 @xmath73 @xmath75 disconnected @xmath76 overtwisted contact @xmath1-manifold @xmath77 @xmath78-ball @xmath79 closed hypersurface @xmath81 hypersurface @xmath0 contact - type boundary product contact @xmath8-manifold @xmath82 @xmath81 @xmath0 not convex violates thurston - bennequin inequality @xmath84 natural projection to @xmath44 @xmath29 cylindrical coordinates @xmath85 functions @xmath86 contact structure @xmath85 overtwisted overtwisted disk @xmath76 contactomorphic to @xmath88 formula replace @xmath90 with @xmath91 hypersurface @xmath92 subset @xmath93 orient @xmath81 characteristic foliation @xmath94 vector field @xmath95 vector field @xmath33 satisfies @xmath96 @xmath98@xmath99 vector field @xmath33 satisfies @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath26 contact - type singularity @xmath106 union @xmath107 source sink point figure 1 fourfold covering push - forward @xmath110 @xmath33 natural projection @xmath111 @xmath81 to quarter - sphere @xmath112 vector field @xmath110 defines singular foliation @xmath113 singularity five points two quarter-)elliptic points @xmath114 preimages two half-)elliptic points @xmath115 periodic orbits @xmath116 @xmath33 @xmath117 hyperbolic point @xmath118 self - intersection leaf @xmath119 preimage @xmath120 hyperbolic point union of periodic orbits @xmath33 @xmath81 convex prove proposition contradiction assumption implies @xmath121 @xmath122 are @xmath123 regions of convex surface @xmath81 transverse intersection with level set @xmath56 contact hamiltonian function intersection @xmath124 spherical component eliashberg - floer - mcduff theorem implies @xmath125 boundary of connected convex symplectic manifold contradiction proves propositionomit proof non - convexity seifert hypersurface @xmath0 bennequin entrelacements quations pfaff astrisque 107 - 108 1983 ) 83161 eliashberg filling holomorphic discs applications geometry low - manifolds london math 151*(1990 ) 4572 eliashberg contact 3-manifolds martinet s work grenoble 42 1991 ) 165192 eliashberg confoliations university lecture series 13 * 1998 ) giroux convexit topologie contact 66 1991 ) 637677 mcduff symplectic manifolds contact boundaries invent math 103*(1991 ) 651671 mori reeb foliations @xmath128 @xmath129-manifolds violating thurston - bennequin inequality preprint 2009 ) arxiv:0906.3237 reeb foliation family legendrian submanifolds deformation standard @xmath126 @xmath128 preprint 2011 ) thurston norm homology @xmath1-manifolds memoirs ams 339 1986 ) 99130 | 0.432476 | 3,058 | 1,673 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,018 | the cross section for vector leptoquark production in electron
gluon collisions is calculated analytically using the lagrangian with the minimal couplings between the leptoquarks and the gauge fields of the standard model .
it is found that the cross section significantly exceeds the corresponding quantity previously presented in the literature . the cross section of exclusive @xmath0 boson production in neutrino
photon scattering emerges as a by - product of this letter .
the obtained results can be used for studies at @xmath1 colliders .
leptoquark , electron , gluon , neutrino , photon 14.80.sv , 13.60.-r | the cross section being the most important quantity for description and interpretation of physics underlying interactions of particles connects theory and experiment .
accurate knowledge on it is therefore very important for deeper understanding already well established theories like the standard model as well as for search of new physics .
the effective lagrangian of the leptoquark model proposed by buchmller , rckl and wyler in 1986 @xcite obeys the symmetries of the standard model gauge groups @xmath2 .
therefore one may expect that dynamics of some processes in these models can formally coincide so that the calculated cross sections turn out also to be the same up to constant factors associated with different couplings .
this letter shows that exclusive production of @xmath0 bosons in neutrino
photon scattering and production of vector leptoquarks in electron
gluon collisions represent such a situation in the leading order of perturbation theory provided the leptoquarks minimally couple to the gauge fields of the standard model .
the cross sections of both reactions are calculated analytically . a significant difference between the result of this letter and previous analysis of the leptoquark production
following @xcite let us also postulate the lagrangian with minimal couplings between vector leptoquarks and the neutral gauge bosons of the standard model : @xmath3,\label{lagrange}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath4 is the field strength tensor of vector leptoquarks , @xmath5 are the field strength tensors of the neutral gauge fields of the standard model , @xmath6 are the coupling constants for the interactions between these gauge fields and the leptoquarks .
the covariant derivative @xmath7 is defined by @xmath8 here @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 are the photon , @xmath12 boson and gluon fields , respectively ; @xmath13 is the elementary electric charge , @xmath14 denotes the electric charge of a leptoquark , @xmath15 is the strong coupling constant , @xmath16 ( @xmath17 is the third component of the weak isospin , @xmath18 is the weinberg angle ) , @xmath19 are the gell - mann matrices . from ( [ lagrange ] )
it follows that the feynman rules for the @xmath20 and @xmath21 vertices are similar to the @xmath22 @xmath23 ones @xcite .
the couplings of vector leptoquarks to the gluon fields have also analogy with the self - interaction of the gluons .
for example , in fig .
[ fig1 ] the explicit form of the feynman rules for the @xmath23 and @xmath24 vertices are given .
one can see that they differ only by constant factors .
let us consider two exclusive reactions .
the first one is the @xmath0 production in neutrino
photon scattering allowed by the standard model @xcite : @xmath25 where @xmath26e@xmath27 .
the second one is production of vector leptoquarks ( @xmath28 ) in interactions of left / right polarized electrons with gluons appearing in the buchmller
rckl wyler leptoquark model @xcite : @xmath29 the reactions ( [ reac1 ] ) and ( [ reac2 ] ) are closely related to each other from a formal point of view . to illustrate this , it is convenient to represent the considered interactions in the form of the feynman diagrams so that the amplitudes contributing to ( [ reac1 ] ) and ( [ reac2 ] ) will look as shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] and fig .
[ fig3 ] , respectively @xcite .
the leptoquark lagrangian has such symmetry properties that the feynman rules for the vertices @xmath30 respectively coincide in their structure with those of the standard model for the vertices @xmath31 up to constant factors ( see fig .
[ fig44 ] ) . as to the familiar rules corresponding to the @xmath32 and @xmath33 vertices
, they also differ from each other only by the coupling constants and the color coefficients .
this means that in the limit of massless initial state leptons the leading order cross sections of the reactions ( [ reac1 ] ) and ( [ reac2 ] ) will have exactly the same dependence on the mandelstam variables and on the masses of the final state particles differing from each other only by a constant as well .
such relations between processes are well known in quantum field theory .
most simple qcd diagrams are exactly analogous to qed diagrams , and the qcd cross section is obtainable by appropriate replacements of the coupling constants in the qed one corresponding to the replacement of the photon by a gluon @xcite .
suppose that @xmath34 and @xmath35 are the leading order cross sections of the reactions ( [ reac1 ] ) and ( [ reac2 ] ) , where @xmath36 is the center - of - mass ( cm ) energy squared , @xmath37 and @xmath38 are the masses of the final state particles .
then , in accordance with the above discussion , they must satisfy the following condition : @xmath39 note that both cross sections in ( [ ratio1 ] ) are taken with the same values of the masses .
therefore , it is enough to know one of the cross sections to find the other .
the cross section of the reaction ( [ reac2 ] ) is calculated using the diagrams from fig .
[ fig3 ] with the corresponding feynman rules given in figs .
[ fig1](b ) and [ fig44](b ) .
the result reads @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the coupling constant corresponding to the @xmath30 vertex , @xmath42 , @xmath43\right.\nonumber\\\left.+2\frac{\,2 m_1 ^ 2 \left(s^2 - 2m_1 ^ 2s+2m_1 ^ 4\right)+m_2 ^ 2\left(s^2-\left(s-3m_1 ^ 2\right)\left(m_1
^ 2 - 2m_2 ^ 2\right)\right)-m_2 ^ 6}{s^3 } \right.\nonumber\\ \left.\times\log \left[\frac{\left(p^2+m_2 ^ 2\right)^{1/2}+p}{m_2}\right]\right.\nonumber\\\left.-\frac{8 m_1 ^ 4\left(s - m_1 ^ 2\right)-m_2 ^ 2 \left(s^2 + 4m_1 ^ 2s+6m_1 ^ 4\right)-m_2 ^ 4 \left(s-12m_1 ^ 2\right)+2 m_2 ^
6}{s^3}\right.\nonumber\\ \left.\times \log \left[\frac{\left(p^2+m_1 ^ 2\right)^{1/2}+p}{m_1}\right]\right\}.\nonumber\\\label{function}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath44 is the cm momentum of any of the final state particles .
the similarity between the cross sections of the reactions ( [ reac1 ] ) and ( [ reac2 ] ) discussed in section [ problem ] allows to verify the validity of the cross section ( [ result ] ) .
actually , the problem of calculation of @xmath34 is now reduced to just performing the following obvious replacements of the coupling constants and the masses of the final state particles in ( [ result ] ) : @xmath45 where @xmath46 is the coupling of the weak charged current ( related to the fermi coupling constant @xmath47 by @xmath48 , @xmath49 is the fine structure constant .
note that the coefficient of @xmath50 is the color factor equal to @xmath51 for the process ( [ reac2 ] ) .
so that one finds @xmath52 the cross section for the reaction ( [ reac1 ] ) in the leading order has also been independently calculated in @xcite , however in such a way that the masses of the final state leptons were neglected ( let us denote this cross section by @xmath53 ) .
this means that ( [ result2 ] ) obtained in this letter and the result of @xcite must asymptotically coincide satisfying the following condition : @xmath54 it should be emphasized that ( [ ratio2 ] ) is a criterion to verify the validity of the cross sections obtained in the present letter .
figure [ fig55 ] shows that ( [ ratio2 ] ) is fulfilled as it must be in the case of correct calculations . moreover , there is a perfect coincidence between ( [ result2 ] ) and @xmath53 over the entire range of the energy for the case of the electron in the final state owing to the vanishing electron mass in comparison with @xmath55 .
the cross section for the reaction ( [ reac2 ] ) in the leading order has also been calculated in @xcite whose result ( let us denote it by @xmath56 ) significantly differs from ( [ result ] ) .
this fact is illustrated in fig .
[ fig5 ] , where dependences of both cross sections on the cm energy are shown for production of the @xmath57 and @xmath58 type vector leptoquarks of mass 1000 gev at @xmath59 and @xmath60 .
the difference is more brightly reflected by the ratio of @xmath56 to @xmath35 shown in fig .
one can see that there may be cases in which the cross section ( [ result ] ) exceeds the corresponding quantity from @xcite by about a factor of two .
this is because different choices of the lagrangian responsible for interaction of the leptoquarks with the gluon fields which lead to different feynman rules for the @xmath24 vertex @xcite . in the present letter
the minimal couplings of the leptoquarks to the gauge fields of the standard model are assumed while in @xcite the lagrangian with anomalous interaction terms is used @xcite .
a standard convolution of the cross section ( [ result ] ) with the gluon distribution in the nucleon gives the cross section of inclusive vector leptoquark production measurable in electron
proton collisions : @xmath61 where @xmath62 is the gluon distribution function , @xmath63 . figure [ fig7 ] shows the cross sections for the production of the ( @xmath64 ) and ( @xmath65 ) type vector leptoquarks evaluated using ( [ convolution ] ) with the gluon distribution function adopted from cteq5 @xcite .
the cross section for vector leptoquark production in electron
gluon collisions is calculated analytically using the @xmath2-symmetric lagrangian with the minimal couplings between the leptoquarks and the gauge fields of the standard model .
it is shown that from a formal point of view this process is similar to exclusive production of @xmath0 bosons in neutrino
photon scattering allowed by the standard model whose cross section is also found .
the cross section of the leptoquark production obtained in this letter significantly exceeds the corresponding result of previous calculations presented in the literature .
the cross sections of inclusive production of the ( @xmath64 ) and ( @xmath65 ) vector leptoquarks in electron nucleon interactions observable at @xmath1 colliders are evaluated .
the presented analysis is applicable to studies of the production of vector leptoquarks of the other types as well .
i thank p.m. zerwas for useful comments on production of leptoquarks in several processes .
i am also thankful to m. spira for drawing my attention to their results on production of leptoquarks at @xmath1 colliders as well as for providing useful information .
this work was supported in part by the russian foundation for basic research ( grant 11 - 02 - 12043 ) , by the program for basic research of the presidium of the russian academy of sciences `` neutrino physics and neutrino astrophysics '' and by the federal target program of the ministry of education and science of russian federation `` research and development in top priority spheres of russian scientific and technological complex for 2007 - 2013 '' ( contract no .
16.518.11.7072 ) .
* fig . 6 : * dependence of the cross sections of production of vector leptoquarks of mass 1000 gev on the cm energy .
right panel : the @xmath57 type leptoquark . left panel : the @xmath58 type leptoquark .
the solid curves represent the results of this letter , the dashed curves are the calculations of @xcite .
the couplings @xmath59 and @xmath60 . * fig . 7 :
* dependence of the ratio of the cross section @xmath69 taken from @xcite to that calculated in the present letter on the cm energy for production of the @xmath58 type vector leptoquark of mass 500 gev ( dash - dotted ) , 700 gev ( dashed ) and 1000 gev ( solid ) .
the dotted line corresponds to @xmath70 . *
fig . 8 : * the cross section of the reaction @xmath71 as a function of the leptoquark mass at @xmath72 gev . dashed curve : the @xmath57 type leptoquark .
solid curve : the @xmath58 type leptoquark .
the coupling @xmath41 is divided out , @xmath60 . | cross section important for physics connects theory experiment accurate knowledge important for understanding theories new physics lagrangian leptoquark model by buchmller rckl wyler 1986 obeys symmetries standard model gauge groups @xmath2 dynamics coincide calculated cross sections same constant factors couplings production @xmath0 bosons in neutrino photon scattering vector leptoquarks in electron gluon collisions represent situation leading order perturbation theory leptoquarks minimally couple to gauge fields standard model cross sections reactions calculated analytically difference between result previous analysis leptoquark production @xcite postulate lagrangian with minimal couplings between vector leptoquarks neutral gauge bosons standard model @xmath3 @xmath4 field strength tensor vector leptoquarks @xmath5 strength tensors neutral gauge fields @xmath6 coupling constants for interactions between gauge fields leptoquarkscovariant derivative @xmath7 defined by @xmath8 @xmath9 are photon @xmath12 boson gluon fields @xmath13 elementary electric charge @xmath14 electric charge of leptoquark strong coupling constant @xmath16 third component of weak isospin weinberg angle gell - mann matrices feynman rules for @xmath20 @xmath21 vertices similar to @xmath22 ones couplings of vector leptoquarks to gluon fields with self - interaction of gluons fig fig1 form feynman rules for @xmath23 @xmath24 vertices differ by constant factors two exclusive reactions first @xmath0 production in neutrino photon scattering standard model second production of vector leptoquarks ( @xmath28 ) in interactions of left / right polarized electrons with gluons in buchmller wyler leptoquark model @xmath29 reactions ( [ reac1 ] reac2 ] ) closely related represent interactions in feynman diagrams amplitudes contributing to reac1 reac2 ) in fig . fig2 fig3 ]leptoquark lagrangian symmetry properties feynman rules for vertices @xmath30 coincide with standard model vertices @xmath31 up to constant factors fig fig44 rules @xmath32 @xmath33 vertices differ by coupling constants color coefficients in limit of massless initial state leptons cross sections of reactions reac1 reac2 same dependence on mandelstam variables masses final state particles differing by constant relations processes known in quantum field theory qcd diagrams analogous to qed diagrams qcd cross section obtainable by replacements coupling constants photon by gluon @xmath34 and @xmath35 are cross sections of reactions @xmath36 is center - of - mass energy squared @xmath37 @xmath38 are masses of final state particles satisfy condition : @xmath39 both cross sections in ratio1 ] ) with same values masses enough to know one to find other cross section of reaction ( [ reac2 ] ) calculated using diagrams from fig fig3 with feynman rules in figs fig1] fig44](bresult reads @xmath40 @xmath41 coupling constant @xmath30 vertex @xmath42 @xmath43\nonumber m_1 (s^2 - 2m_1 2s+2m_1 4\right)+m_2 2(s-3m_1 2(m_1 2 - 2m_2-m_2 6}{s^3(p^2+m_2 2\right){1/2}+p}{m_2}{8 m_1 4\left(s - m_1 2\right)-m_2 (s^2 + 4m_1 2s+6m_1 4\right)-m_2 \left(s-12m_1 2\right)+2 m_2 6}{s^3}{(p^2+m_1 2\right{1/2}+p}{m_1}\nonumber{aligned @xmath44 cm momentum final state particles similarity cross sections reactions reac1 reac2 ] validity cross section resultproblem calculation @xmath34 to replacements coupling constants masses final state particles in result ] @xmath45 @xmath46 coupling weak charged current related fermi coupling constant @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 fine structure constant coefficient @xmath50 color factor equal to @xmath51 for process ( [ reac2 ] ) @xmath52 cross section reaction reac1 ] ) independently calculated in @xcite masses final state leptons neglected @xmath53 [ result2 ] ) result @xcite must coincide condition @xmath54 [ ratio2 ] ) criterion validity cross sections figure fig55 shows [ ratio2 ] ) fulfilled correct calculations perfect coincidence between [ result2 ] ) @xmath53 over range energy electron final state vanishing electron mass @xmath55 cross section for reaction ( [ reac2 ] ) order calculated in @xcite result @xmath56 differs from ( [ result ] ) illustrated in fig dependences of cross sections on cm energy shown for production @xmath57 @xmath58 type vector leptoquarks mass 1000 gev at @xmath59 and @xmath60difference reflected by ratio @xmath56 to @xmath35 in fig . cases cross section exceeds quantity @xcite factor two different choices lagrangian gluon lead to different feynman rules for @xmath24 vertex @xcite minimal couplings leptoquarks to gauge fields standard model assumed @xcite lagrangian anomalous interaction used standard convolution of cross section with gluon distribution nucleon gives vector leptoquark production in electron proton collisions @xmath61 @xmath62 gluon distribution figure shows cross sections for production @xmath64 @xmath65 ) vector leptoquarks using convolution with gluon distribution function from cteq5 @xcite cross section for vector leptoquark production in electron gluon collisions calculated using @xmath2-symmetric lagrangian with minimal couplings between leptoquarks gauge fields standard model process similar to production @xmath0 bosons in neutrino photon scattering standard model leptoquark production exceeds previous calculations cross sections production @xmath64 @xmath65 ) vector leptoquarks in electron nucleon interactions at @xmath1 colliders evaluated analysis applicable to production vector leptoquarks other typeszerwas comments production leptoquarks thankful m. spira results production @xmath1 colliders information work supported by russian foundation basic research grant 11 - 02 - 12043 program basic research russian academy sciences neutrino physics astrophysics federal target program ministry education science russian research development priority russian scientific technological complex 2007 - 2013 contract 16.518.11.7072 ) fig . 6 dependence cross sections production vector leptoquarks mass 1000 gev on cm energy @xmath57 leptoquark @xmath58 solid curves results letter dashed curves calculations @xcite couplings @xmath59 @xmath60 fig . 7 dependence ratio cross section @xmath69 @xcite calculated letter cm energy production @xmath58 type vector leptoquark mass 500 gev 700 1000 gev dotted line corresponds @xmath70 fig . 8 cross section reaction @xmath71 function leptoquark mass @xmath72 gev dashed curve @xmath57 solid curve @xmath58 type leptoquark coupling @xmath41 divided out @xmath60 | 0.441553 | 2,987 | 1,568 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,024 | the gonality @xmath0 of a graph @xmath1 is the smallest degree of a divisor of positive rank in the sense of baker - norine . in this note
we show that computing @xmath0 is np - hard by a reduction from the maximum independent set problem .
the construction shows that computing @xmath0 is moreover apx - hard . | in @xcite , baker and norine developed a theory of divisors on finite graphs in which they uncovered many parallels between finite graphs and riemann surfaces .
in particular , they stated and proved a graph theoretical analogue of the classical riemann - roch theorem .
see @xcite for background on the interplay between divisors on graphs , curves and tropical curves . as observed in @xcite , there is also close connection between divisor theory and the chip - firing game of bjrner - lovsz - shor @xcite .
see @xcite for the connection to the abelian sandpile model and biggs dollar game @xcite .
an important parameter associated to a connected graph @xmath1 , in the context of divisor theory , is the ( divisorial ) gonality @xmath0 of @xmath1 .
this is the smallest degree of a positive rank divisor . in terms of the chip - firing game , the gonality
can then be expressed has at least 3 nodes . ] as @xmath2 , where @xmath3 is the maximum number of chips that can be placed on the graph @xmath4 such that adding a chip at an arbitrary node will result in a finite game .
there are only few graph classes for which the gonality is known .
examples include trees , complete multipartite graphs and @xmath5 grid graphs , see @xcite .
a conjectured upper bound is @xmath6 matching the classical brill - noether bound , see @xcite . in @xcite
, it was show that the treewidth of @xmath1 is a lower bound on @xmath0 , as conjectured in @xcite . in @xcite , a lower bound @xmath7
is given in terms of the smallest nonzero eigenvalue @xmath8 of the laplacian and the maximum degree @xmath9 .
for the erds - rnyi graph , it is known that asymptotically almost surely @xmath10 ( provided that @xmath11 ) , see @xcite . in this note
we show that computing the gonality of a graph is np - hard , see theorem [ maintheorem ] .
let @xmath4 be a connected graph .
we allow graphs to have parallel edges , but no loops .
for @xmath12 , we denote by @xmath13 the set of edges with an end in @xmath14 and an end in @xmath15 and by @xmath16:=e[a , a]$ ] the set of edges with both ends in @xmath14 . for distinct nodes
@xmath17 , we use the abbreviation @xmath18 for the set of edges between @xmath19 and @xmath20 . by @xmath21
we denote the degree of a node @xmath19 .
the _ laplacian _ of @xmath1 is the matrix @xmath22 defined by @xmath23 a vector @xmath24 is called a _ divisor _ on @xmath1 and @xmath25 is its _
degree_. a divisor @xmath26 is _ effective _ if @xmath27 .
two divisors @xmath26 and @xmath28 are _ equivalent _ , written @xmath29 , if there is an integer vector @xmath30 such that @xmath31 .
this is indeed an equivalence relation and equivalent divisors have equal degrees as the entries in every column of @xmath32 sum to zero .
let @xmath26 be a divisor .
if @xmath26 is equivalent to an effective divisor , then we define @xmath33 if @xmath26 is not equivalent to an effective divisor , we set @xmath34 .
observe that equivalent divisors have the same rank .
answering a question of h.w .
lenstra , it was shown in @xcite that computing the rank of a divisor is np - hard .
finally , we define the _ gonality _ of @xmath1 to be @xmath35 observe that in the definition of gonality , we can restrict ourselves to _ effective _ divisors @xmath26 .
hence @xmath0 is the minimum degree of an effective divisor @xmath26 such that for every node @xmath20 there is an effective divisor @xmath36 such that @xmath37 .
also note that @xmath38 since taking @xmath39 for all @xmath40 gives a divisor of positive rank . to facilitate reasoning about equivalence of effective divisors ,
we denote by @xmath41 the incidence vector of a subset @xmath42 of @xmath43 .
when @xmath26 and @xmath28 are effective divisors and @xmath44 , we say that @xmath28 is obtained from @xmath26 by firing on the set @xmath42 .
if we think of @xmath45 as the number of chips on a node @xmath20 , then firing on @xmath42 corresponds to moving one chip along each edge of the cut @xmath46 in the direction from @xmath42 to @xmath47 . in particular
, we must have that @xmath48 for every @xmath49 as @xmath50 .
hence , we can not fire on any set @xmath42 for which the cut @xmath46 has more than @xmath51 edges .
the following lemma from @xcite shows that for equivalent effective divisors @xmath26 and @xmath28 , we can obtain @xmath28 from @xmath26 by successively firing on sets .
[ chain ] let @xmath26 and @xmath28 be equivalent effective divisors satisfying @xmath52 . then there is a chain of sets @xmath53 such that @xmath54 is effective for every @xmath55 and such that @xmath56 . for an effective divisor @xmath26 on @xmath1 , we define the following equivalence relation @xmath57 on @xmath43 : @xmath58 an edge @xmath59 for which the ends are equivalent is called _
@xmath26-blocking_. note that if @xmath26 and @xmath28 are equivalent effective divisors , then @xmath60 . we need the following observations .
[ equiv ] let @xmath27 be a divisor on @xmath1 and let @xmath17
. then @xmath61 if and only if for some effective divisor @xmath36 we can fire on a subset @xmath42 with @xmath62 , @xmath63 . in particular , @xmath64 if every @xmath19@xmath20 cut has more than @xmath51 edges .
this follows directly from lemma [ chain ] . [ blocking ]
let @xmath27 be a divisor on @xmath4 .
let @xmath65 be the set of @xmath26-blocking edges and let @xmath42 be a component of @xmath66 .
then for every effective divisor @xmath36 we have @xmath67 .
this follows as no chips can move along a @xmath26-blocking edge .
to prove hardness of computing @xmath0 , we use the following construction .
let @xmath4 be a graph .
let @xmath68 .
construct a graph @xmath69 in the following way .
start with a single node @xmath70 .
for every @xmath40 add three nodes : @xmath71 . for every edge @xmath72 , make two nodes @xmath73 and @xmath74 .
the edges of @xmath69 are as follows . for every @xmath72 , add an edge between @xmath73 and @xmath74 , add @xmath75 parallel edges between @xmath19 and @xmath73 and @xmath75 parallel edges between @xmath74 and @xmath20 . for every @xmath40 , add three parallel edges between @xmath76 and @xmath77 , @xmath75 parallel edges between @xmath20 and @xmath76 and @xmath75 parallel edges between @xmath77 and @xmath70 . observe that @xmath75 is equal to the number of nodes of @xmath69 plus one .
see figure [ f1 ] for an example .
we first show that @xmath80 .
let @xmath26 be an effective divisor on @xmath69 with @xmath81 .
consider the equivalence relation @xmath82 on @xmath83 . clearly , @xmath84 .
hence , by lemma [ equiv ] , the @xmath75-fold edges are @xmath26-blocking .
it follows that @xmath70 is equivalent to all nodes @xmath85 , and every node @xmath40 is equivalent @xmath76 and to all nodes @xmath74 . by lemma
[ blocking ] , the numbers of chips on each of the sets @xmath86 , @xmath87 , @xmath88 and @xmath89 are constant over all effective @xmath36 .
hence , form the fact that @xmath90 it follows that now we show that equality can be attained . for this ,
let @xmath104 be an independent set in @xmath1 of size @xmath105 .
take the partition @xmath106 where @xmath107 and @xmath108 are singletons .
every edge of @xmath1 has endpoints in two distinct sets @xmath109 and @xmath110 with @xmath111 .
we orient the edge from @xmath109 to @xmath110 .
we now define the effective divisor @xmath26 on @xmath69 as follows .
@xmath112 it is easy to check that @xmath113 .
now for every @xmath114 let @xmath115 and let @xmath116 then for every @xmath117 , @xmath118 is effective
. furthermore , @xmath119 for every @xmath120 and @xmath121 for every edge with head in @xmath109 .
it follows that @xmath26 has positive rank .
since computing @xmath105 is np - hard , it follows from lemma [ gonalpha ] that also computing @xmath0 is np - hard . in @xcite
it was shown that computing @xmath105 is in fact apx - hard even on cubic graphs . since for cubic graphs
@xmath1 we have @xmath122 , and @xmath123 , it follows that computing @xmath0 is apx - hard . | @xcite baker norine developed theory divisors on finite graphs uncovered parallels between riemann surfaces proved graph theoretical analogue riemann - roch theorem interplay divisors graphs curves tropical curves connection between divisor theory chip - firing game bjrner - lovsz - shor connection abelian sandpile model biggs dollar game important parameter connected graph @xmath1 divisor theory divisorial gonality @xmath0 of @xmath1 smallest degree of positive rank divisor chip - firing game gonality expressed 3 nodes @xmath2 @xmath3 maximum number chips on graph @xmath4 adding chip arbitrary node finite game few graph classes gonality known examples include trees complete multipartite graphs @xmath5 grid graphs conjectured upper bound is @xmath6 matching classical brill - noether bound treewidth of @xmath1 lower bound on @xmath0 lower bound @xmath7 smallest nonzero eigenvalue @xmath8 of laplacian maximum degree @xmath9erds - rnyi graph known asymptotically @xmath10 @xmath11 ) see @xcite computing gonality graph np - hard theorem maintheorem @xmath4 connected graph allow graphs parallel edges no loops @xmath12 denote @xmath13 edges end @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16=e[a a]$ edges both ends @xmath14 distinct nodes @xmath17 abbreviation @xmath18 edges between @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 denote degree node @xmath19 laplacian _ @xmath1 matrix @xmath22 defined @xmath23 vector @xmath24 _ divisor _ @xmath1 @xmath25 degree_ divisor @xmath26 effective _ if @xmath27 divisors @xmath26 @xmath28 equivalent @xmath29 integer vector @xmath30 @xmath31 equivalence relation equivalent divisors equal degrees entries column @xmath32 sum to zero @xmath26 divisor equivalent effective divisor define @xmath33 not equivalent set @xmath34 equivalent divisors same rank shown @xcite computing rank divisor np - harddefine gonality @xmath1 @xmath35 to effective divisors @xmath26 @xmath0 minimum effective divisor @xmath26 node @xmath20 effective divisor @xmath36 @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 gives divisor positive rank @xmath41 incidence vector subset @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath26 @xmath28 effective divisors @xmath28 obtained from @xmath26 firing set @xmath42 @xmath45 number chips node @xmath20 firing on @xmath42 moving one chip each edge cut @xmath46 from @xmath42 to @xmath47 @xmath48 for every @xmath49 as @xmath50 can fire @xmath42 @xmath46 more than @xmath51 edges equivalent effective divisors @xmath26 @xmath28 obtain @xmath28 from @xmath26 firing on sets @xmath26 @xmath28 equivalent divisors satisfying @xmath52 chain of sets @xmath53 @xmath54 effective for @xmath55 @xmath56 effective divisor @xmath26 @xmath1 equivalence relation @xmath57 on @xmath43 : @xmath58 edge @xmath59 ends equivalent @xmath26-blocking@xmath26 @xmath28 equivalent divisors @xmath60 need observations @xmath27 divisor on @xmath1 @xmath17 @xmath61 effective divisor @xmath36 fire subset @xmath42 with @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath19@xmath20 cut more than @xmath51 edges follows from lemma @xmath27 divisor on @xmath4 @xmath65 set @xmath26-blocking edges @xmath42 component of @xmath66 every effective divisor @xmath36 @xmath67 no chips move along @xmath26-blocking edge prove hardness computing @xmath0 construction @xmath4 graph @xmath68 construct graph @xmath69 single node @xmath70 @xmath40 add three nodes @xmath71 every edge @xmath72 two nodes @xmath73 @xmath74 edges of @xmath69 every @xmath72 add edge between @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 parallel edges between @xmath19 @xmath40 add three edges between @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath70 @xmath75 equal to nodes @xmath69 plus onefigure [ f1 ] example show @xmath80 @xmath26 effective divisor @xmath69 @xmath81 equivalence relation @xmath82 on @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath75-fold edges @xmath26-blocking @xmath70 equivalent nodes @xmath85 @xmath40 equivalent @xmath76 nodes @xmath74 numbers chips sets @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 constant @xmath36 form @xmath90 equality attained @xmath104 independent set @xmath1 size @xmath105 partition @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 singletons edge @xmath1 endpoints sets @xmath109 @xmath110 @xmath111 orient edge from @xmath109 to @xmath110 define effective divisor @xmath26 on @xmath69 @xmath112 check @xmath113 every @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 effective @xmath119 @xmath120 @xmath121 every edge head @xmath109 @xmath26 positive rank computing @xmath105 np - hard computing @xmath0 np - hard computing @xmath105 apx - hard even cubic graphscubic graphs @xmath1 @xmath122 computing @xmath0 apx - hard | 0.344895 | 2,242 | 1,244 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,026 | in the framework of the su(3 ) chiral quark model , the @xmath0wave baryon - baryon bound states are investigated .
it is found that according to the symmetry character of the system and the contributions from chiral fields , there are three types of bound states .
the states of the first type , such as @xmath1_{(0,0)}$ ] and @xmath2_{(0,1/2)}$ ] are deeply bound dibaryon with narrow widths .
the second type states , @xmath3_{(0,5/2)}$],@xmath3_{(3,1/2)}$ ] , @xmath4_{(0,3)}$ ] and @xmath4_{(3,0)}$ ] are also bound states , but with broad widths .
@xmath5_{(1,1/2)}$ ] , @xmath6_{(0,1)}$ ] , and @xmath7_{(2,1/2)}$ ] are third type states .
they , like _ d _ , are weakly bound only if the chiral fields can provide attraction between baryons . | in recent years , there is quite a bit activity on searching dibaryons both theoretically and experimentally . because it is commonly believed that the radius of the dibaryon is less than @xmath8 , studying dibaryon would enhance our knowledge about the short - range behavior of the quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) , provide the information about the nonperturbative qcd ( npqcd ) and its appropriate treatment .
moreover , the existence of dibaryon is a direct evidence of quarks in hadrons and hadronic systems .
since jaffe predicted h @xcite , there have been lots of efforts devoted to the dibaryon study .
the most intensive studied dibaryons are h , @xmath9 and @xmath10 . up to now
, the most believed value of h is around the @xmath11 theshold @xcite , which agrees with the experimental finding , the lower limit of @xmath12 @xcite .
the theoretical prediction for @xmath13 varies model by model , but most believed value is several tens of mev @xcite .
the theoretical result of @xmath10 is still away from the expected value extracted from double - charge - exchange reactions @xcite .
therefore , it is reasonable to propose studies on the systems with multi - strangeness . with this idea , @xmath14 and
@xmath15 were studied @xcite . in this talk
, we would demonstrate a systematic study of the possible @xmath0wave dibaryons .
because npqcd still can not directly be solved , one has to use model to approximately treat the npqcd effect . in order to reliably study dibaryon ,
the employed model should at least satisfy two - fold requirements : ( 1 ) the ground state properties of baryons , and the available experimental data of the nucleon - nucleon and the nucleon - hyperon ( @xmath16 ) scattering can reasonably be reproduced in the dynamical calculation . ( 2 ) in the extended application , no additional parameters are required .
the su(3 ) chiral quark model is just one of the models which meets the requirements @xcite .
the details of the model can be found in ref.@xcite .
the model parameters are fixed before the calculation @xcite .
the set of values used in ref.@xciteis called model i ( set i ) . in order to further reduce the number of free parameters , we choose the masses of strange scalar mesons , @xmath17 and @xmath18 , to be the values of the mesons with the same quantum numbers in the particle data table .
moreover , in order to test the effects of various chiral fields , we also establish the extended su(2)chiral quark model ( model ii ) , where @xmath19 , @xmath17 and @xmath18 are disregarded , and the su(2 ) chiral quark model ( model iii ) , where only @xmath20 and @xmath21 are presented .
the bound state problem of the six - quark system is solved by using the resonating group method ( rgm ) . in rgm
, the trial wave function of the system can be written as @xmath22,\ ] ] where @xmath23 describes the trial wave function of of relative motion between baryon clusters @xmath24 and @xmath25 and @xmath26 is the antisymmetrizer . in terms of the variational method , one can solve @xmath23 and consequently the binding energy of the system .
as is well known , the matrix element @xmath27 , where the superscript @xmath28 implies that @xmath26 acts in the @xmath29 space only , is an important measure of the action of the pauli principle on the two - baryon state .
it also specifies the symmetry character of the system .
the symmetry character of the two - baryon system could generally be divided into three categoyies . in the first category ,
@xmath30 . this feature would be enormously beneficial to form a state with the @xmath31_{orbit}$ ] symmetry . if the inter - baryon interaction further demonstrates the attractive character with certain strength , it is possible to form a smaller - sized bound state . in the second category , @xmath32 .
thus , the pauli blocking effect here are very small so that two baryons are basically independent with each other .
then , if the inter - baryon meson - exchange interaction can provide large enough attraction , the system would be bound .
this result may also be deduced in terms of a model in the baryon - meson degrees of freedom .
the states with @xmath33 belong to the third category .
the pauli blocking effect between baryons are incredibly serious so that the state with @xmath31_{orbit}$ ] is almost a forbidden state , namely , it is very hard to form a bound state .
we present the calculated binding energies and the corresponding root - mean - square radii ( @xmath34 ) for the possible @xmath0wave states in the first and second categories in tables 1@xmath35 and @xmath36 , respectively .
[ table:1 ] @lllllll + + & system & @xmath27 & model i ( set i ) & model i ( set ii ) & model ii & model iii + & & & @xmath37 & @xmath37 & @xmath37 & @xmath37 + 0 & @xmath38 & @xmath39 & 22.2 //1.01 & 18.5 //1.05 & 64.8//0.84 & 62.7//0.86 + & @xmath40 & @xmath39 & 16.0 //1.10 & 13.5 //1.14 & 6.3//1.25 & 13.2//1.11 + -1 & @xmath41 & @xmath39 & 24.6 //0.99 & 19.0 //1.04 & 11.7//1.13 & 21.5//0.99 + & @xmath42 & @xmath39 & 25.9 //0.95 & 29.3 //0.93 & 78.0//0.79 & 76.3//0.80 + -5 & @xmath43 & @xmath39 & 92.4 //0.71 & 76.5 //0.72 & 58.8//0.75 & 52.1//0.76 + -6 & @xmath14 & @xmath39 & 113.8 //0.66 & 98.5 //0.67 &
72.6//0.70 & 51.9//0.73 + + + & system & @xmath27 & model i ( set i ) & model i ( set ii ) & model ii & model iii + & & & @xmath37 & @xmath37 & @xmath37 & @xmath37 + -3 & @xmath44 & 1 & 3.5 //1.18 & 12.7 //0.98 & 31.8 //0.81 & 49.5 //0.74 + & @xmath45 & 1 & 4.4 //1.15 & 14.2 //0.96 & 34.3 //0.80 & 49.6 //0.74 + -4 & @xmath46 & @xmath47 & 4.1 //1.17 & 0.4 //1.30 & -0.5 //1.33 & 3.1 //1.18 + -5 & @xmath48 & & 32.9 //0.78 & 32.6 //0.77 & 29.3 //0.79 & 17.6
//0.86 + + the units for @xmath49 and rms are in @xmath50 and @xmath51 , respectively .
_ s _ stands for the strangeness . in order to see the effects of various chiral fields and give a possible range of predicted bound states
, we also study these states in terms of models ii and iii and tabulated the result in table 1 . from table 1@xmath35
, one finds that in the @xmath52 and @xmath53 cases , the systems in model i are bounder than in models ii and iii , because the strong attraction provided by @xmath21 and strange mesons @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
if one believes that the su(3 ) model is more suitable for the multi - strangeness system , @xmath1_{(0,0)}$ ] and @xmath2_{(0,1/2)}$ ] should be deeply bound states with narrow widths .
on the other hand , in the @xmath54 and @xmath55 systems , models i and ii are favored by the low - spin and high - spin systems , respectively . because the color - magnetic interaction ( cmi ) shows repulsive and attractive features in the @xmath56 and @xmath57 systems , respectively , the binding energies of the @xmath58 systems are generally higher than those of the @xmath56 systems . moreover , due to the strong decay modes of both composed baryons , the widths of these bound states are broad .
the results in table 1@xmath36 shows another type of character . because , like @xmath59 , the exchange effect is almost negligible , the resultant binding energy is very sensitive to the contributions from chiral fields .
it is shown that the high - strangeness system is bounder in model i and the low - strangeness system has larger binding energy in model iii .
nevertheless , these systems are weakly bound . finally , to ensure the predicted bound states are reliable and stable
, we also examine their model - parameter dependencies .
the @xmath60- and @xmath61-dependencies are demonstrated in table 1 by sets i and ii .
it is shown that the qualitative binding behavior does not change although the binding of most systems become slightly weaker due to the overall weaker attractive feature from @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
moreover , the @xmath62- and @xmath63-dependencies are plotted in fig .
[ fig:1 ] .
it is shown that the binding energy always becomes smaller with increasing @xmath63 and decreasing @xmath62 , but the qualitative binding behavior does not change .
therefore , our predicted bound states are stable and reliable .
we investigate the possible @xmath0wave baryon - baryon bound states with the su(3 ) chiral quark model , and test the reliabilities and stabilities of results by using different models and model parameters .
it is shown that the symmetry property , characterized by the expectation value of antisymmetrizer , of the system is a major factor to affect the binding behavior .
sometimes , the contributions from various chiral fields demonstrate very important roles .
we arrange all the bound states into three types .
the first type states , such as @xmath1_{(0,0)}$ ] and @xmath2_{(0,1/2)}$ ] should be deeply bound states with narrow widths , or dibaryons.the states of second type , such as @xmath3_{(0,5/2)}$ ] , @xmath3_{(3,1/2)}$ ] , @xmath4_{(0,3)}$ ] and @xmath4_{(3,0)}~(d^{*})$ ] are bound states with broad widths .
the states like @xmath5_{(1,1/2)}$ ] , @xmath6_{(0,1)}$ ] , and @xmath7_{(2,1/2)}$ ] are third types states . like @xmath59 , they generally the weakly bound states , and their binding behaviors
very much depend on the contributions from the chiral fields .
we would call great attention from physicists on the states of the first and second types and wish that these states can be searched in the future experiment .
99 r.l.jaffee , pyhs.rev.lett .
38 ( 1977 ) 195 .
k.imai , hadrons and nuclei with strangeness- proceedings of the first sino - japan symposium on strangeness physics , singapore , 1999 , and references therein .
k.yazaki , prog.theor.phys .
suppl.91 ( 1987 ) 146 , and references therein .
p.n.shen , z.y.zhang , y.w.yu , s.q.yuan , s.yang , j.phys .
g ( 1999 ) .
f.wang , j.l.ping , g.h.wu , et al . ,
c51 ( 1995 ) 3411 .
x.q.yuan , z.y.zhang , y.w.yu and p.n.shen , phys.rev .
c ( 1999 ) .
g.wagner , l.ya.glozman , a.j.buchmann and a.faessler , y.w.yu , z.y.zhang and x.q.yuan , commun.theor.phys . 31
( 1999 ) 1 .
q.b.li and p.n.shen , chin.phys.lett .
z.y.zhang , y.w.yu , p.n.shen and et al .
, nucl.phys .
a625 ( 1997 ) 59 . | recent years activity searching dibaryons theoretically experimentally believed radius dibaryon less than @xmath8 studying dibaryon knowledge short - range behavior quantum chromodynamics information nonperturbative qcd npqcd treatment existence dibaryon evidence quarks in hadrons hadronic systems since jaffe predicted h @xcite efforts devoted dibaryon study studied dibaryons h @xmath9 @xmath10 believed value h around @xmath11 theshold @xcite agrees with experimental finding lower limit @xmath12 @xcite theoretical prediction @xmath13 varies value several tens of mev @xcite theoretical result @xmath10 away from expected value double - charge - exchange reactions reasonable propose studies systems multi - strangeness @xmath14 @xmath15 studied @xcite systematic study possible @xmath0wave dibaryons npqcd directly solved model treat npqcd effect study dibaryon model should satisfy two requirements ground state properties baryons experimental data nucleon - nucleon nucleon - hyperon ) scattering reproduced dynamical calculation extended application no additional parameters requiredsu(3 ) chiral quark model meets requirements @xcite details in ref.@xcite parameters fixed before calculation set of values in ref. model i reduce free parameters choose strange scalar mesons @xmath17 @xmath18 same quantum numbers in particle data table test effects chiral fields establish extended su(2)chiral quark model @xmath19 @xmath17 disregarded su(2 ) chiral quark model only @xmath20 @xmath21 presented bound state problem six - quark system solved resonating group method ) trial wave function written as @xmath22, @xmath23 relative motion between baryon clusters @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 antisymmetrizer variational method solve @xmath23 binding energy system matrix element @xmath27 superscript @xmath28 implies @xmath26 acts in @xmath29 space only measure of action pauli principle on two - baryon state specifies symmetry character system symmetry character two - baryon system divided into three categoyies first category @xmath30 beneficial to form state with @xmath31_{orbit}$ ] symmetryinter - baryon interaction attractive character possible form smaller sized bound state second category @xmath32 pauli blocking effect small two baryons independent inter - baryon meson - exchange interaction large attraction system bound result deduced model baryon - meson degrees freedom states @xmath33 third category pauli blocking effect baryons serious state @xmath31 forbidden hard form bound state calculated binding energies root - mean - radii @xmath34 possible @xmath0wave states first second categories tables 1@xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath27 model i @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 22.2 //1.01 18.5 //1.05 64.8//0.84 62.7//0.86 + @xmath40 @xmath39 16.0 //1.10 13.5 //1.14 6.3//1.25 13.2//1.11 + -1 @xmath41 24.6 //0.99 19.0 //1.04 11.7//1.13 21.5//0.99 + @xmath42 25.9 //0.95 29.3 //0.93 78.0//0.79 76.3//0.80 + -5 @xmath43 92.4 //0.71 76.5 //0.72 58.8//0.75 52.1//0.76 + -6 @xmath14 @xmath39 113.8 //0.66 98.5 //0.67 72.6.70 51.9//0.73 + system @xmath27 model i @xmath37 + -3 @xmath44 3.5 //1.18 12.7 //0.98 31.8 //0.81 49.5 //0.74 @xmath45 4.4 //1.15 14.2 //0.96 34.3 //0.80 49.6 //0.74 + -4 @xmath46 @xmath47 4.1 //1.17 0.4 //1.30 -0.5 //1.33 3.1 //1.18 + -5 @xmath48 32.9 //0.78 32.6 //0.77 29.3 //0.79 17.6 //0.86 + units @xmath49 rms @xmath50 @xmath51 strangeness effects fields bound states models ii iii table 1 @xmath52 @xmath53 systems model i bounder models ii iii strong attraction @xmath21 mesons @xmath17 @xmath18 su(3 ) model suitable multi - strangeness system @xmath1_ @xmath2_ deeply bound narrow widths @xmath54 @xmath55 models i ii favored low - spin high - spin systemscolor - magnetic interaction shows repulsive attractive features in @xmath56 @xmath57 systems binding energies higher than to strong decay modes of baryons widths bound states broad results in table 1@xmath36 shows character like @xmath59 exchange effect negligible binding energy sensitive to contributions chiral fields high - strangeness system bounder in model i low - strangeness system larger binding energy in model iii systems weakly bound bound states examine model - parameter dependencies @xmath60- @xmath61-dependencies demonstrated in table 1 qualitative binding behavior change weaker due to weaker attractive feature from @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath62- @xmath63-dependencies plotted in fig binding energy smaller with increasing @xmath63 decreasing @xmath62 qualitative binding behavior change predicted bound states stable reliable investigate @xmath0wave baryon - baryon bound states with su(3 ) chiral quark model test reliabilities stabilities results different models model parameters symmetry property expectation value antisymmetrizer major binding behavior contributions from chiral fields important rolesarrange bound states three types first type @xmath1(0,0) @xmath2(0,1/2) deeply bound narrow widths second type @xmath3(0,5/2),1/2)(0,3)(3,0) broad widths @xmath5{(1,1/2) @xmath6(0,1) @xmath7{(2,1/2) third types @xmath59 weakly bound binding behaviors depend contributions chiral fields attention physicists first second types searched future experiment.l.jaffee pyhs.rev.lett . 38 ( 1977 ) 195 k.imai hadrons nuclei strangeness first sino - japan symposium strangeness singapore 1999 k.yazaki prog.theor.phys . suppl.91 ( 1987 ) 146 p.n.shen z.y.zhang y.w.yu s.q.yuan s.yang j.phys . ( 1999 ) f.wang j.l.ping g.h.wu c51 ( 1995 ) 3411 x.q.yuan z.y.zhang y.w.yu p.n.shen.rev . c ( 1999 )wagner.faessler.yu z.y.zhang.yuan commun.theor.phys . 31 1999 ) q.b.li p.n.shen chin.phys.lett z.zhang.yu p.n.shen nucl.phys . a625 1997 ) 59 | 0.43245 | 2,941 | 1,628 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,034 | in noyelles et al . ( 2008 , astron . astrophys . , 478 , 959 - 970 ) ,
a resonance involving the wobble of titan is hinted at .
this paper studies this scenario and its consequences .
the first step is to build an accurate analytical model that would help to find the likely resonances in the rotation of every synchronous body . in this model ,
i take the orbital eccentricity of the body into account , as well as its variable inclination with respect to saturn s equator .
then an analytical study using the second fundamental model of the resonance is performed to study the resonance of interest .
finally , i study the dissipative consequences of this resonance .
i find that this resonance may have increased the wobble of titan by several degrees .
for instance , if titan s polar momentum @xmath0 is equal to @xmath1 ( @xmath2 and @xmath3 being respectively titan s mass and radius ) , the wobble might be forced to 41 degrees .
thanks to an original formula , i find that the dissipation associated with the forced wobble might not be negligible compared to the contribution of the eccentricity .
i also suspect that , due to the forced wobble , titan s period of rotation may be somewhat underestimated by observers .
finally , i use the analytical model presented in this paper to compute the periods of the free librations of the four galilean satellites as well as the saturnian satellite rhea . for io and europa ,
the results are consistent with previous studies . for the other satellites , the periods of the free librations are respectively @xmath4 d , @xmath5 y and @xmath6 y for ganymede , @xmath7 y , @xmath8 y and @xmath9 y for callisto , and @xmath10 d , @xmath11 y and @xmath12 y for rhea .
example.eps gsave newpath 20 20 moveto 20 220 lineto 220 220 lineto 220 20 lineto closepath 2 setlinewidth gsave .4 setgray fill grestore stroke grestore | as most of the major natural satellites of the solar system planets , titan is locked in a spin - orbit synchronous resonance , i.e. its rotation period is very near to its orbital period around its parent planet saturn ( see for instance richardson et al .
2004 @xcite ) .
this corresponds to an equilibrium state known as a cassini state .
thanks to the cassini fly - bys , titan s gravity field is known well enough to study the behaviour of titan s spin around the cassini state . in particular , we now know titan s oblateness coefficients @xmath13 and @xmath14 ( tortora et al .
@xcite ) . in a recent paper , noyelles et al .
( @xcite , hereafter cited as paper i ) give a first theory of titan s rotation , with 3 degrees of freedom . in that work , an analytical approach and a numerical one , more complete ,
are compared .
moreover , some aspects of titan s rotation are elucidated , especially a likely resonance involving the free libration of titan s wobble . in this paper ,
i first propose an improvement of the analytical model resulting in better agreement with the numerical results .
then i study the dynamics of the likely resonance , and discuss its implications .
i firstly recall how to obtain the hamiltonian of the problem , as explained for instance in paper i. 3 references frames are considered : the first one @xmath15 is centered on titan s mass barycenter and is in translation with the reference frame in which the orbital motion of titan is described .
this is a cartesian coordinate system refering to the equatorial plane of saturn and to the node of this plane with the ecliptic at j2000 .
the second frame @xmath16 is linked to titan s angular momentum @xmath17 , and the third one @xmath18 is rigidly linked to titan .
the first variables that are being used are andoyer s variables ( see andoyer 1926 @xcite and deprit 1967 @xcite ) , which are based on two linked sets of euler s angles .
the first set @xmath19 locates the position of the angular momentum in the first frame @xmath20 , while the second one @xmath21 locates the body frame @xmath18 in the second frame @xmath16 ( see fig . [
fig : angles ] ) .
the canonical set of andoyer s variables consists of the three angular variables @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 and their conjugated momenta defined by the norm @xmath25 of the angular momentum and two of its projections : @xmath26 + unfortunately , these variables present two singularities : when @xmath27 ( i.e. the angular momentum is colinear to @xmath28 , there is no wobble ) , @xmath22 and @xmath23 are undefined , and when @xmath29 ( i.e. when titan s principal axis of inertia is perpendicular to its orbital plane ) , @xmath24 and @xmath23 are undefined .
that is why we use the modified andoyer s variables : @xmath30 with @xmath31 .
paper i details how to obtain the hamiltonian of the problem in the modified andoyer s variables .
it takes account of the free rotation of the body , and of the external torque due to saturn ( see eq.[equ : hamiltonclass ] ) .
@xmath32\big[\frac{\gamma_1+\gamma_2 } { 1-\gamma_1-\gamma_2}\xi_q^2+\frac{\gamma_1-\gamma_2}{1-\gamma_1+\gamma_2}\eta_q^2\big ] \\ + n\big(\frac{d_0}{d}\big)^3\bigg(1+\delta_s\big(\frac{d_0}{d}\big)^2\bigg)\big[\delta_1(x^2+y^2)+\delta_2(x^2-y^2)\big ] \end{split}\ ] ] the coefficients of the hamiltonian are defined as follows : @xmath33 + where @xmath34 is saturn s @xmath13 , @xmath35 the distance titan - saturn , @xmath36 the mean value of @xmath35 , @xmath37 the mean motion associated with @xmath36 .
@xmath38 and @xmath39 are the first two coordinates of saturn in the reference frame @xmath18 bound to titan .
if we call @xmath40 , @xmath41 and @xmath42 the coordinates of saturn s centre of mass in the reference frame @xmath20 defined above , we have @xmath43 with @xmath44 and @xmath45 at the exact cassini state , @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 being respectively titan s mean longitude and ascending node in the frame @xmath20 . in paper
i , henrard & schwanen s model ( i.e. , titan moving on a circular orbit with a constant inclination and a constant precession of the nodes ) has been used to obtain the `` obliquity '' at the equilibrium @xmath52 and the three fundamental periods of the free librations around the cassini state .
then a numerical integration has been performed over 9000 years with complete ephemeris for titan ( tass1.6 , vienne & duriez 1995 @xcite ) .comparison between the analytical and numerical results with @xmath53 , adapted from paper i. the differences are given here relative to the numerical values , but relative to the analytical ones in paper i. [ cols="<,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ tab : comprambh ] tab.[tab : comprambh ] gives a comparison with previous studies for io and europa .
we can see a good agreement , except perhaps with the `` obliquity '' of io .
i think that the difference of about @xmath54 can be explained by the fact that lainey s ephemeris have been updated between henrard s study and this paper .
in particular , henrard used @xmath55 rad as given in lainey s phd thesis ( 2002 @xcite ) , which is about @xmath56 higher than the value used in this study .
these data have been computed assuming that the satellites are in hydrostatic equilibrium , especially for the values of @xmath57 .
since the values of the periods of libration depend on @xmath57 , observing these librations should help estimate this parameter and test the hypothesis of hydrostatic equilibrium .
unfortunately , the free librations should have been damped by dissipative effects , unless the amplitude associated is being forced by a resonance ( as could be the case for titan ) .
but no resonance appears clearly in tab.[tab : frekgalrhea ] ( perhaps except between ganymede s wobble @xmath58 and the node of europa , with a regression period of 30.22 years ) .
the general analytical model given in this paper permits a first 3-dimensional description of the rotation of every synchronous body .
more particularly , it gives the equilibrium position , the three fundamental frequencies of the free librations , and the main terms of the free solution .
it is applied successfully to titan , io and europa , in the sense that the results are consistent with the previous studies .
moreover , this paper presents a study of a possible resonance involving titan s wobble . with it ,
i show that if the capture into resonance occured , then the wobble could currently have a forced amplitude of several degrees , and so induce a significant internal tidal dissipation .
moreover , the forcing of the wobble could falsify the space - based detection of titan s period of rotation to appear a little faster than it actually is , in particular because titan s rotation axis would be significantly different from its pole axis of figure .
cassini results on titan s rotation should give some information about that .
even if the system is not in resonance , a quasi - resonant state may have a detectable effect on the free libration w. i am indebted to several colleagues for fruitful discussions , especially nicolas rambaux , anne lematre , jacques henrard , alain vienne and michael efroimsky .
i also warmly thank the two referees , a. dobrovolskis and an anonymous one , who pointed out a mistake in a previous version of this paper .
this work benefited from the financial support of a fundp postdoctoral research grant .
i here detail the hamiltonian given by ( eq.[eq : t2 ] ) , i.e. seidelmann p.k . ,
abalakin v.k . ,
bursa m. et al . , report of the iau / iag working group on cartographic coordinates and rotational elements of the planets and satellites : 2000 , cel .
astr . , 82 , 83 - 111 ( 2002 ) | major satellites titan in spin - orbit synchronous resonance rotation period near to orbital around saturn richardson et al . 2004 @xcite corresponds to equilibrium state cassini state cassini fly - bys titan s gravity field known behaviour s spin around cassini know titan s oblateness coefficients @xmath13 and @xmath14 ( tortora et al . @xcite ) recent paper noyelles et al . paper i first theory of titan s rotation 3 degrees of freedom analytical approach numerical one compared aspects titan s rotation elucidated likely resonance free libration titan s wobble propose improvement analytical model better agreement with numerical results study dynamics likely resonance discuss implications recall hamiltonian of problem paper i 3 references frames first @xmath15 on titan s mass barycenter orbital motion titan equatorial plane saturn node with ecliptic at j2000 second frame @xmath16 linked to titan s angular momentum @xmath17 third @xmath18 linked to titanfirst variables used are andoyer s variables see andoyer 1926 @xcite deprit 1967 based on two euler s angles first set @xmath19 locates angular momentum in first frame @xmath20 second @xmath21 locates body frame @xmath18 in second frame @xmath16 fig canonical set andoyer s variables three angular variables @xmath22 conjugated momenta defined by norm @xmath25 two projections @xmath26 variables present two singularities when @xmath27 colinear to no wobble @xmath22 undefined @xmath29 s axis perpendicular to orbital plane @xmath24 @xmath23 undefined use modified andoyer s variables @xmath30 @xmath31 paper i details hamiltonian problem in modified variables takes account free rotation body external torque due to saturn hamiltonclass@xmath32\big[\frac{\gamma_1+_2 } 1-_2}\xi_q^2+\eta_q^2\big n\big({d_0}}\big)^3\bigg(1+\delta_s\big()^2\bigg)[\delta_1(x^2+y^2)+\delta_2(x^2-y^2)\big ]{split} coefficients hamiltonian defined @xmath33 + @xmath34 saturn s @xmath13 @xmath35 distance titan - saturn @xmath36 mean value mean motion @xmath38 coordinates saturn @xmath18 bound to titan @xmath40 coordinates saturn s centre of mass @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 at cassini state @xmath46 titan s mean longitude ascending node @xmath20 henrard & schwanen s model titan circular orbit constant inclination precession nodes used obtain obliquity '' at equilibrium @xmath52 three fundamental periods free librations around cassini statenumerical integration performed over 9000 years ephemeris for titan ( tass1.6 vienne duriez 1995 @xcite.comparison analytical numerical results with @xmath53 adapted from paper i differences relative to numerical values analytical in paper i comprambh comparison with previous studies for io europa good agreement except obliquity of io difference of @xmath54 by lainey s ephemeris updated between henrard s study paper henrard used @xmath55 rad lainey s phd thesis 2002 @xmath56 higher than study data computed assuming satellites in hydrostatic equilibrium values @xmath57 periods libration depend on @xmath57 observing librations estimate parameter test hypothesis hydrostatic equilibrium free librations should damped by dissipative effects unless forced by resonance titan no resonance in tab except ganymede s wobble @xmath58 node of europa regression period 30.22 years analytical model permits first 3-dimensional description of rotation of synchronous body gives equilibrium position three fundamental frequencies of free librations main terms of free solution applied to titan io europa results consistent with previous studiespaper presents study possible resonance titan s wobble if capture resonance wobble could forced amplitude degrees induce internal tidal dissipation forcing wobble could falsify detection titan s rotation faster titan s rotation axis different from pole axis cassini results on titan s rotation information quasi - resonant state may effect on free libration indebted to colleagues nicolas rambaux anne lematre jacques henrard alain vienne michael efroimsky thank referees a. dobrovolskis anonymous pointed mistake in previous version work benefited from support fundp postdoctoral research grant detail hamiltonian by seidelmann p abalakin v.k bursa m. report iau / iag working group on cartographic coordinates rotational elements planets satellites : 2000 , cel . astr . , 82 , 83 - 111 ( 2002 ) | 0.314569 | 1,952 | 994 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,037 | we analyze the size limits of coupled map lattices with diffusive coupling at the crossover of low - dimensional to high - dimensional chaos .
we investigate the existence of standing - wave - type periodic patterns , within the low - dimensional limit , in addition to the stable synchronous chaotic states depending upon the initial conditions .
further , we bring out a controlling mechanism to explain the emergence of standing - wave patterns in the coupled map lattices . finally , we give an analytic expression in terms of the unstable periodic orbits of the isolated map to represent the standing - wave patterns . | coupled dynamical systems often arise in nature whenever a collective or cooperative phenomenon is favoured @xcite . in particular , the coupled map lattice with diffusive coupling ( cml ) provides a prototype model to study various features associated with the cooperative evolution of constituent systems @xcite .
one of the important properties of such cmls is that they exhibit size instability , that is , there is a critical size on the number of constituents for which stable synchronous chaotic state exists . increasing the number of constituents beyond this limit leads to the occurrence of spatially incoherent behaviour ( eg .
, high - dimensional chaos ) .
for example , bohr and christensen @xcite have studied such size instability behaviour in a two - dimensional coupled logistic lattice .
similar desynchronization has been found in arrays of coupled systems represented by nonlinear oscillators @xcite .
the stability of synchronous chaos in coupled dynamical systems plays an important role in the study of pattern formation , spatiotemporal chaos , etc .
@xcite . in general
, these studies on size instability are valid in most situations .
however , we have noted that in certain circumstances there is an ambiguity in dealing with these systems below the critical system sizes . to be specific , there exist certain nontrivial ranges of initial conditions for which the cml admits spatial and temporally periodic solutions in contrast to the usually expected stable synchronous chaos . in this brief report
, we show numerically the coexistence of such periodic states with the stable synchronous chaotic state well below the critical system size and explain the underlying mechanism .
consider an one - dimensional coupled map lattice with nearest - neighbour diffusive coupling @xcite @xmath0 , \label{cml}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath1 @xmath2 represents the lattice sites and @xmath3 is the system size , subject to periodic boundary conditions .
the stability analysis of the synchronized chaotic state defined by @xmath4 in the above cml using the procedure derived originally for coupled oscillators by heagy _ et al _
@xcite , gives the relation connecting transverse lyapunov exponents ( tles ) , in terms of the lyapunov exponent of single ( isolated ) map , @xmath5 as @xmath6 .
\label{tr_lya}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the synchronous state is stable only if the tles ( @xmath7 , @xmath8 ) are all negative . the above relation ( [ tr_lya ] )
can also be obtained by means of a direct perturbation of the form @xmath9 as considered by bohr and christensen @xcite .
the synchronous state loses its stability when the long waves ( lowest mode ) are unstable @xcite .
this means that for @xmath10 the synchronous state is unstable .
thus , substituting @xmath11 in eq .
( [ tr_lya ] ) , one obtains the maximum / critical lattice size @xmath12 that supports stable synchronous state as @xmath13 now , let us consider a coupled logistic lattice with diffusive coupling ( cll ) where each lattice site in eq .
( [ cml ] ) is occupied by the logistic map @xmath14 in particular for the choice @xmath15 , the lyapunov exponent of single ( isolated ) map is positive ( i.e. , @xmath16 ) and chaotic . in this case , for coupling strength @xmath17 , the critical lattice size ( @xmath18 ) is found to be @xmath19 from eq .
( [ lmax ] ) .
that is , upto the lattice size @xmath19 the cll exhibits synchronous chaos and for lattice size @xmath20 the synchronization is found to be lost , thereby confirming the size instability in the diffusively coupled logistic lattices .
when random initial conditions are assumed , in most cases , the above cll with diffusive coupling exhibits stable synchronous chaos for @xmath21 as predicted by eq .
( [ lmax ] ) . however , there are certain ranges of initial conditions for which cll shows some interesting asynchronous spatiotemporal patterns even for @xmath22 . for example , for @xmath23 and with the choice of initial conditions @xmath24 @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 or several nearby initial conditions , the cll exhibits a standing wave type pattern as shown in fig .
[ n8dyn_n](a ) .
but for the same lattice size , if we choose a different set of initial conditions , @xmath24 @xmath33 , @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 or the nearby points , two standing waves with different amplitudes are produced within the cll as in fig .
[ n8dyn_n](b ) .
similarly a disturbed standing wave pattern as shown in fig .
[ n8dyn_n](c ) is possible to be exhibited by the cll for many choices of initial conditions . a synchronous chaos , as one would expect for @xmath23 from the theory , is also exhibited by the cll as depicted in fig . [ n8dyn_n](d ) , for most of the random choices of initial conditions .
this kind of multiple stable solutions is also observed in the cll for other lattice sizes , namely @xmath41 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath44 which are also less than @xmath18 .
the occurrence of various spatiotemporal patterns for different lattice sizes of the cll and their percentage of occurrence are shown in table [ tab_pattern ] . in order to quantify the percentage of occurrence of different spatiotemporal patterns , we have used @xmath45 sets of random initial conditions ( i.c.s ) in the interval @xmath46 to @xmath47 and identified the number of i.c.s which lead to a specific pattern as indicated in table [ tab_pattern ] .
we have further confirmed our assertion by analyzing the same systems in different computing environments such as intel pentium 4 , sun sparc server / workstation and compaq alpha workstation .
in addition , by considering the whole cml of size @xmath3 as a single @xmath3-dimensional map we have verified that the above spatiotemporal periodic structures are essentially the stable fixed points of this map . for example , the periodic structure in fig .
[ n8dyn_n](a ) represents a fixed of point of period-2 of the eight - dimensional map and the eigenvalues of the corresponding jacobian matrix all are having magnitude less than unity . in a similar fashion one can verify that all the periodic structures are the stable fixed points of corresponding periods .
thus , in addition to the stable synchronized manifold , there exists other invariant sets corresponding to stable periodic structures .
.the possible spatiotemporal patterns for different lattice sizes and their percentage of occurrence for the coupled logistic lattice sampled over a set of @xmath48 random initial conditions ( ic s ) .
the parameters are fixed as @xmath15 in eq .
( [ fx : logi ] ) and @xmath49 in eq .
( [ cml ] ) . here ,
sw : standing wave , sync . : synchronized .
[ cols="^,<,>,^ , < , > " , ] [ table1 ] so , if it is possible to control the coupling force to fall in the region which corresponds to a periodic solution , then one can obtain standing wave patterns irrespective of the size of the lattices .
this is in fact possible by choosing appropriate initial conditions to each lattice point and this explains the occurrence of standing waves ( asynchronous ) as shown in figs .
[ n8dyn_n](a ) and [ n8dyn_n](b ) in the cll well below the critical lattice size ( @xmath18 ) .
similar explanation holds good for fig .
[ n8dyn_n](c ) .
the same principle is involved in the occurrence of standing waves even for @xmath50 @xcite .
from a careful numerical analysis , we have observed that the nodes and antinodes of standing waves are formed at or very close to the upos of the isolated logistic map . keeping this in mind
, we propose an expression for the standing wave pattern @xcite of the form @xmath51 where , @xmath52 where the discrete index @xmath53 corresponds to the lattice site , @xmath54 denotes the mode of the waves , and @xmath55 and @xmath56 represent the nodes and antinodes of different standing waves present in the pattern , which can take values from @xmath47 to @xmath57 and @xmath47 to @xmath58 , respectively and @xmath57 is the period of upo .
also in the above equation ( [ swave ] ) , @xmath59 s represent the values of the upos of the isolated logistic map at the node of the @xmath55-th standing wave , and @xmath60 and @xmath61 are the absolute values of the differences between upos at the node and upos at high and low amplitudes at the antinodes of the @xmath55th standing waves , respectively . the wave patterns with one and two number of standing waves obtained using eq .
( [ swave ] ) for @xmath62 are shown in fig .
[ n8dyn_a ] , whereas for the same lattice size , the numerically obtained pattern which have been discussed in sec .
[ sec3 ] is shown in figs .
[ n8dyn_n](a ) and [ n8dyn_n](b ) .
one observes that these two figures coincide very closely .
in this report , we have pointed out that coupled map lattices with diffusice coupling exhibit multiple stable states for the same set of parameters with respect to the initial conditions .
it has also been shown that by choosing appropriate initial conditions , one can obtain different standing wave type patterns for such coupled map lattices even for lattice size much less than the critical system size @xmath18 , where one normally would expect synchronized chaos .
in addition , we have proposed the mechanism behind the occurrence of such standing wave patterns .
this work has been supported by the national board for higher mathematics , department of atomic energy , government of india and the department of science and technology , government of india through research projects . | coupled dynamical systems arise collective cooperative phenomenon favoured coupled map lattice with diffusive coupling provides prototype model cooperative evolution exhibit size instability critical size on constituents for stable synchronous chaotic state increasing constituents beyond limit leads to spatially incoherent behaviour high - dimensional chaos bohr and christensen studied size instability in two - dimensional coupled logistic lattice similar desynchronization found in coupled systems nonlinear oscillators stability of synchronous chaos pattern formation spatiotemporal chaos studies on size instability valid most situations certain circumstances ambiguity in dealing with systems below critical system sizes nontrivial ranges of initial conditions cml admits spatial temporally periodic solutions contrast stable synchronous chaos report show coexistence of periodic states with stable synchronous chaotic state below critical system size explain underlying mechanism consider one - dimensional coupled map lattice with nearest - neighbour diffusive coupling @xmath1 lattice sites system size subject to periodic boundary conditionsstability analysis of synchronized chaotic state defined by @xmath4 procedure for by heagy gives relation connecting transverse lyapunov exponents @xmath5 as @xmath6 synchronous state stable if tles ( @xmath7 , @xmath8 ) all negative relation obtained direct perturbation of form @xmath9 by bohr and christensen synchronous state loses stability when long waves unstable for @xmath10 synchronous state unstable substituting @xmath11 in obtains maximum critical lattice size @xmath12 supports stable synchronous state as @xmath13 coupled logistic lattice with diffusive coupling each lattice site occupied by logistic map @xmath14 for @xmath15 lyapunov exponent of map is positive @xmath16 ) and chaotic for coupling strength @xmath17 critical lattice size ( @xmath18 ) @xmath19 upto lattice size @xmath19 cll exhibits synchronous chaos for lattice @xmath20 synchronization lost confirming size instability in diffusively coupled logistic latticesrandom initial conditions assumed cll with diffusive coupling exhibits stable synchronous chaos for @xmath21 predicted by eq . certain ranges of initial conditions cll shows asynchronous spatiotemporal patterns even for @xmath22 @xmath23 choice initial conditions @xmath24 nearby conditions cll exhibits standing wave pattern in . [ n8dyn_n](a ) same lattice size different initial conditions @xmath24 nearby points two standing waves with different amplitudes produced cll fig . [ n8dyn_n](b ) disturbed standing wave pattern in fig . [ n8dyn_n](c ) cll for many choices initial conditions synchronous chaos for @xmath23 exhibited by cll in fig . [ n8dyn_n](d ) for most random choices initial conditions multiple stable solutions observed in cll for other lattice sizes @xmath41 @xmath44 less than @xmath18 occurrence of spatiotemporal patterns for different lattice sizes cll percentage shown in table [ tab_pattern ] .quantify percentage occurrence spatiotemporal patterns used @xmath45 sets random initial conditions interval @xmath46 to @xmath47 identified i.c.s to specific pattern in table tab_pattern ] confirmed analyzing same systems in different environments intel pentium 4 sun sparc server workstation compaq alpha workstation considering cml size @xmath3 as single @xmath3-dimensional map verified spatiotemporal periodic structures are stable fixed points map periodic structure in fig . [ n8dyn_n](a ) represents fixed point of period-2 eight - dimensional map eigenvalues matrix magnitude less than unity all periodic structures are stable fixed points of periods stable synchronized manifold other invariant sets to stable periodic structures possible spatiotemporal patterns for different lattice sizes percentage occurrence for coupled logistic lattice sampled over @xmath48 random initial conditions parameters fixed as @xmath15 @xmath49 sw : standing wave sync synchronized control coupling force in region periodic solution obtain standing wave patterns irrespective of size latticespossible choosing initial conditions each lattice point explains standing waves asynchronous in figs n8dyn_n](a ) n8dyn_n](b ) below critical lattice size @xmath18 ) similar explanation for fig n8dyn_n](c ) same principle standing waves @xmath50 @xcite nodes antinodes standing waves formed at close to upos isolated logistic map propose expression standing wave pattern @xcite form @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 corresponds lattice site @xmath54 mode waves @xmath55 @xmath56 represent nodes antinodes of different standing waves values from @xmath47 to @xmath57 to @xmath58 @xmath57 is period of upo @xmath59 s represent values upos at node @xmath55-th standing wave @xmath60 @xmath61 values differences between upos node high low amplitudes antinodes @xmath55th standing waves wave patterns with one two number standing waves obtained using for @xmath62 shown in fig . [ n8dyn_a ] same lattice size numerically obtained pattern shown in figs .n8dyn_n](a ) and n8dyn_n](b ) figures coincide closely pointed coupled map lattices with diffusice coupling exhibit multiple stable states same parameters initial conditions choosing appropriate initial conditions different standing wave patterns for coupled lattices even lattice size less than critical system size @xmath18 proposed mechanism standing wave patterns work supported by national board for higher mathematics department of atomic energy government of india department of science and technology | 0.353141 | 2,235 | 1,106 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,044 | a four mass torsion pendulum facility for testing of the lisa grs is under development in trento . with a lisa - like test mass suspended off - axis with respect to the pendulum fiber ,
the facility allows for a direct measurement of surface force disturbances arising in the grs .
we present here results with a prototype pendulum integrated with very large - gap sensors , which allows an estimate of the intrinsic pendulum noise floor in the absence of sensor related force noise .
the apparatus has shown a torque noise near to its mechanical thermal noise limit , and would allow to place upper limits on grs related disturbances with a best sensitivity of 300 fn/@xmath0 at 1mhz , a factor 50 from the lisa goal .
also , we discuss the characterization of the gravity gradient noise , one environmental noise source that could limit the apparatus performances , and report on the status of development of the facility .
address = dipartimento di fisica , universit di trento , and i.n.f.n . , gruppo di trento , povo ( tn ) , italy , email=carbone@science.unitn.it address = centro fisica degli stati aggregati , povo ( tn ) , italy address = dipartimento di fisica , universit di trento , and i.n.f.n . , gruppo di trento , povo ( tn ) , italy address = dipartimento di fisica , universit di trento , and i.n.f.n . , gruppo di trento , povo ( tn ) , italy address = dipartimento di fisica , universit di trento , and i.n.f.n . , gruppo di trento , povo ( tn ) , italy address = dipartimento di fisica , universit di trento , and i.n.f.n . , gruppo di trento , povo ( tn ) , italy address = dipartimento di fisica , universit di trento , and i.n.f.n . , gruppo di trento , povo ( tn ) , italy address = dipartimento di fisica , universit di trento , and i.n.f.n . , gruppo di trento , povo ( tn ) , italy submitted to _ proc . of the @xmath1 int .
lisa symposium _ ,
aip conference proceedings , 2006 | the lisa gravity wave sensitivity goal requires that the residual acceleration of its test masses ( tms ) must be kept below 3 fm / s@xmath2/@xmath0 down to 0.1mhz @xcite .
this is obtained with a drag - free control , with the spacecraft that shields the tms from environmental disturbances and is centered about the tms geodesic motion according to a position sensor , also called `` gravity reference sensor '' ( grs ) .
the current design of the lisa grs foresees cubic 2 kg and ( 46 mm)@xmath3 tms , surrounded by an array of electrodes included in a capacitive readout and actuation scheme @xcite . in preparation for the flight - test of the lisa core elements , ltp @xcite ,
relevant upper limits on the most important grs related surface disturbances have been already set by means of torsion pendulums @xcite .
these experiments used a single lisa - like tm , hanging in axis from a torsion fiber and surrounded by one grs prototype : this configuration is extremely sensitive to torques arising in the grs but is insensitive to net forces and to any source acting along axes passing through the center of the tm .
upper limits on force noise sources have been thus set using model - dependent arm - lengths , to convert the torques into forces @xcite . to overcome this limit
, we are developing a new torsion pendulum facility , employing a four tm configuration @xcite , that allows for a direct measurement of force disturbances arising in the grs .
we present here results with a first prototype pendulum that allows an estimate of the intrinsic pendulum performance .
we discuss the characterization of the gravity gradient noise , one environmental noise source that could limit the apparatus performances , and finally report on the status of development of the facility .
on the left , a sketch of the experiment concept ( top view ) . on the right , a photograph of the facility : its main component , the vacuum chamber , is visible.,width=377 ] a sketch of the experiment concept is shown in fig.[facility : fig ] , with a photograph of the facility .
four lisa - like tms lay on the horizontal plane , are mounted on a cross - shaped support , and are suspended off - axis with respect to the pendulum torsion fiber , at distance @xmath4 bigger than the tm side - length .
one of the tms is included in a grs prototype : any net force arising inside the grs gets thus converted into a torque on the pendulum by the arm - length @xmath4 .
this pendulum has full sensitivity to disturbances arising inside the sensor , independently from their location , and the unique conversion arm - length @xmath4 allows to set model - independent force noise upper - limits .
use of hollow tms reduces the pendulum weight and allows for thinner torsion fibers .
this makes the pendulum mainly sensitive to surface forces ( however the most relevant envisioned by noise analyses ) but increases its force sensitivity , that can be further enhanced by enlarging the pendulum arms , in an optimal compromise with low weight and coupling to gravity gradients ( see below ) .
the direct measurement of grs relevant parameters like force gradients ( `` stiffness '' ) or stray electrostatic forces will provide then fully representative estimates for lisa . the main component of the facility is a 250 @xmath5 vacuum vessel ( see fig.[facility : fig ] ) , accomodating the pendulum and the grs , that sits on a concrete slab partially isolated from the laboratory floor .
a 90 cm long tube encloses the torsion fiber . a 400 @xmath6 turbo pump sets the residual pressure at @xmath7 mbar .
the entire apparatus is enclosed in a thermally insulated box whose temperature is controlled by a thermalized water bath stabilizing the air circulating inside a heat exchanger .
the experiment is equipped with manual micro - manipulators ( 4 dof for grs alignment + 2 dof for pendulum rotational / vertical alignment ) and motorized stages ( 2 translators for grs alignment and automatized stiffness measurements ) .
the pendulum motion is monitored by a commercial autocollimator , with 50 nrad resolution for both twist and tilt modes .
the pendulum tilt motion is suppressed with a magnetic eddy current damper ( decay time @xmath8 s ) .
finally , the facility is equipped with different environmental monitors , like thermometers for in - vacuum and in - air temperatures , two 3-axis flux - gate magnetometers for magnetic fields and field gradients and a 2-axis tilt - meter for the residual tilt motion of the apparatus .
left : a photograph of the first pendulum prototype , in the vacuum vessel : 1 .
cross - shaped support 3 .
capacitive sensors 5 . sensing electrodes 6 .
copper electrostatic shields .
right : typical force noise sensitivity of the apparatus , compared with lisa and ltp residual force noise goals.,height=207 ] as the main grs - related noise sources are expected to depend strongly on the tm - electrode separation ( gap ) , an estimate of the intrinsic pendulum noise floor has been performed with a prototype pendulum integrated with very large - gap sensors ( allowing us also to debug the facility and verify the fiber performances ) .
we employed ( 3 cm)@xmath3 solid uncoated al tms ( @xmath9 g ) , mounted on an al cross shaped support and centered at a distance of @xmath1089 mm from the fiber axis ( see fig.[facility : fig ] ) . a au - coated mirror was mounted along the fiber axis .
the total pendulum weight was @xmath11 g , roughly the same of the next pendulum , with ( 46 mm)@xmath3 tms .
two single axis capacitive sensors surrounded two of the tms ( electrically isolated ) at very large gaps ( 8 mm along the force sensitive axis ) , providing both a high sensitivity ( 200 nrad /@xmath0 ) readout of the pendulum twist motion and actuation authority .
we used a 95 cm long , 50 @xmath12 m diameter w fiber , with a measured mechanical quality factor @xmath13 . with the pendulum inertia
@xmath14 g m@xmath15 and a torsion constant @xmath16 nnm / rad , the torsion pendulum resonance was @xmath17 mhz .
a typical force sensitivity performance of the apparatus , obtained by dividing the measured pendulum torque noise by the arm - length @xmath18 mm , is shown in fig.[noise : fig ] .
below 1 mhz , the observed noise is within a factor 2 from the instrumental limit , set here by the pendulum mechanical thermal noise . above 1 mhz ,
the sensitivity is limited by the angular read - out noise . the performance shown in fig.[noise : fig ] would allow to place upper limit on the disturbances related to a grs prototype at the level of 800 fn/@xmath0 between 0.2 and few mhz , with a best sensitivity of 300 fn/@xmath0 at 1 mhz , a factor 50 from the lisa goal . the excess noise at low frequencies , that could be given by environmental temperature fluctuations as well as tilt motion of the apparatus , is still being investigated .
a possible drawback of this four mass pendulum configuration is its sensitivity to gravity gradients @xcite .
the gravity gradient torque induced on a pendulum by objects at a distance @xmath19 goes like @xmath20 , with @xmath4 and @xmath5 , respectively , the characteristic radius and degree of symmetry of the pendulum mass distribution about the torsion axis .
this pendulum symmetry is nominally high , with @xmath21 .
however , lower order terms , particularly quadrupole , could enter through machining and assembling imperfections , producing mass distribution asymmetries and tilting of the pendulum : this enhances the pendulum sensitivity to gravity gradients and avoids reaching its ultimate performances . in order to qualitatively characterize the role of gravity gradient noise of our experimental site
, we performed a test in which we purposely enhanced the pendulum quadrupole moment ( @xmath22 ) to detect any induced excess noise on the pendulum .
two of the four masses where moved towards the center of the pendulum by @xmath23 mm , as shown in fig.[noise : fig : nightday ] .
if the previous configuration had a `` nominally '' nulled quadrupole moment , i.e. @xmath24 , this produced a ( calculated ) mass quadrupole moment of the pendulum of order @xmath25 g m@xmath15 ( for comparison , a 1 cm displacement would produce @xmath26 g m@xmath15 , and a 2 mm displacement @xmath27 g m@xmath15 ) . left : scheme of the enhancement of the pendulum mass quadrupole .
right : comparison of the typical night and day force sensitivities of the unbalanced quadrupole pendulum configuration.,height=207 ] measured force noise spectra are shown in fig.[noise : fig : nightday ] . when human activity is present close to the experiment , in particular due to people working at few m from the apparatus , the observed force noise is about a factor 50 higher than the instrumental limit . however ,
when human activity inside and near the lab is reduced ( night and week - ends ) we did not observe any excess noise compared to the typical performance of the pendulum , as in fig.[noise : fig ] . with reasonable tolerances of the final ( 46 mm)@xmath3 tm assembly of order 100 @xmath12 m ( or better ) , the mass quadrupole moment of the pendulum
will be reduced at least by a factor 300 , compared to the one in fig.[noise : fig : nightday ] .
this would make gravity gradient noise to be substantially negligible for the pendulum performance . even if this test provides only a partial picture of the gravity gradient noise of our experimental site (
this is only one of the possible pendulum assembling imperfections , as for instance tilting with respect to the vertical axis , for which we did not perform a specific investigation ) , this test shows that quadrupole gravity gradient noise should not represent a relevant limitation for reaching the ultimate pendulum performance in terms of force sensitivity .
schematic of the new pendulum , currently under construction : ( a ) a 3d cartoon of the final assembly ; ( b ) top view schematic ; ( c ) a sketch of the `` stiffness compensator '' ; ( d ) one of the already delivered 46 mm tms ( the supporting shaft is visible ) ; ( e ) a replica of the ltp grs engineering model.,height=207 ] we are now working on the integration of a fully representative grs prototype to be tested in the facility .
a new pendulum , shown in fig.[newpend : fig ] , is currently under construction , employing four al ( @xmath28mm)@xmath3 hollow tms .
one tm will be included into a grs prototype that implements the ltp design .
an additional capacitive sensor , implemented with very large gaps and needed to compensate the tilt - twist coupling induced on the pendulum by the grs - related stiffness , will surround the opposite tm .
this `` stiffness compensator '' will also be the support for an optical read - out proposed for lisa by our infn collaborators @xcite .
these two tms will be electrically isolated , for the capacitive readout and actuation . for electrostatic homogeneity
, the remaining two tms will be electrically grounded to the rest of the pendulum and then to the fiber .
similarly , the whole pendulum will be au - coated , included tms and cross shaped support .
this facility will allow to test grs prototypes for ltp and lisa with full - size tms and highly representative conditions of the flight mission . by direct measurement of forces instead of torques
, it will allow stringent upper limits on lisa force noise , which will be independent of the model of the noise source and its location within the grs .
furthermore , the role of the sources that produce force noise on the lisa tms will be more straightforward to evaluate and model , leading to a more accurate verification of the lisa noise model .
99 bender p _
et al . _ , lisa esa - sci(2000)11 , 2000 weber w j _
et al._2002 _ spie proc . _ * 4856 * 31 dolesi r _ et al._2003 class .
grav.*20 * s99 anza s _ et al._2005 class .
quant . grav.*22
carbone l _
et al._2003 phys .
rev . lett.*91 * 151101 carbone l
_ et al._2005 class .
quant . grav.*22
* s509 carbone l
_ et al._2004 class .
quant . grav.*21
carbone l _
et al._proc . of 10@xmath29 marcel grossmann meeting on general relativity , gr - qc/0411049 y. su _
et al._1994 phys . rev .
* d * * 50 * , 3614 di fiore l. _ et al .
_ , this conference proceedings | lisa gravity wave sensitivity goal requires residual acceleration test masses below 3 fm / s to 0.1mhz obtained with drag - free control spacecraft shields tms from environmental disturbances centered about tms geodesic motion position sensor gravity reference sensor current design lisa grs foresees cubic 2 kg 46 mm)@xmath3 tms electrodes capacitive readout actuation scheme preparation for flight - test lisa core elements upper limits on grs surface disturbances set torsion pendulums experiments used single lisa - like tm torsion fiber surrounded by one grs prototype sensitive to torques grs insensitive to net forces source upper limits on force noise sources set using model - dependent arm - lengths convert torques into forces developing new torsion pendulum facility four tm configuration direct measurement of force disturbances grs present results with first prototype pendulum estimate intrinsic pendulum performance discuss characterization gravity gradient noise source apparatus performances report on status of development facility sketch of experiment concept photograph of facility main component vacuum chamber visible=377 sketch experiment concept in fig. photograph facility four lisa - like tms horizontal plane mounted on cross - shaped support suspended off - axis pendulum torsion fiber bigger than tm side - length one included in grs prototype net force inside grs converted into torque on pendulum by arm - length pendulum sensitivity to disturbances inside sensor location unique conversion arm - length model - independent force noise upper - limits hollow tms reduces pendulum weight allows thinner torsion fibers pendulum sensitive to surface forces increases force sensitivity enlarging pendulum arms low weight coupling gravity gradients direct measurement of grs parameters force gradients electrostatic forces representative estimates for lisa main component 250 @xmath5 vacuum vessel fig pendulum grs on concrete slab isolated laboratory floor 90 cm long tube encloses torsion fiber 400 @xmath6 turbo pump sets residual pressure at @xmath7 mbar apparatus in thermally insulated box controlled by thermalized water bath exchangerexperiment equipped with manual micro - manipulators 4 dof for grs alignment 2 pendulum rotational vertical alignment motorized stages 2 translators automatized stiffness measurements pendulum motion monitored by commercial autocollimator 50 nrad resolution twist tilt modes tilt suppressed with magnetic eddy current damper decay time s facility equipped with environmental monitors thermometers two 3-axis flux - gate magnetometers 2-axis tilt - meter photograph first pendulum prototype vacuum vessel cross - shaped support capacitive sensors sensing electrodes copper electrostatic shields typical force noise sensitivity compared with lisa ltp residual force noise goals noise sources on tm - electrode separation gap estimate of pendulum noise floor performed with prototype pendulum large - gap sensors employed 3 cm)@xmath3 solid uncoated al tms g on cross shaped support centered mm from fiber axis au - coated mirror mounted along fiber axis total pendulum weight @xmath11 g same next pendulum 46 mm)@xmath3 tmssingle axis capacitive sensors surrounded tms large gaps 8 mm force sensitive axis providing high sensitivity 200 nrad readout pendulum twist motion actuation authority used 95 cm long 50 m diameter w fiber mechanical quality factor @xmath13 pendulum inertia @xmath14 g torsion constant @xmath16 nnm / rad torsion pendulum resonance @xmath17 mhz typical force sensitivity performance pendulum torque noise by arm - length mm shown in. below 1 mhz noise within factor 2 from instrumental limit pendulum mechanical thermal noise above 1 mhz sensitivity limited by angular read - out noise performance upper limit disturbances 800 fn/@xmath0 between 0.2 few mhz best sensitivity 300 fn/ at 1 mhz factor 50 from lisa goal excess noise at low frequencies environmental temperature fluctuations tilt motion investigated drawback four mass pendulum configuration sensitivity to gravity gradients gravity gradient torque pendulum symmetry pendulum mass distribution about torsion axis pendulum symmetry nominally high @xmath21lower order terms particularly quadrupole enter machining assembling imperfections producing mass distribution asymmetries tilting pendulum enhances pendulum sensitivity to gravity gradients avoids reaching ultimate performances characterize gravity gradient noise test enhanced pendulum quadrupole moment ( @xmath22 ) detect excess noise two of four masses moved towards center by @xmath23 mm in previous configuration had nulled quadrupole moment @xmath24 produced mass quadrupole moment pendulum @xmath25 g m@xmath15 1 cm displacement @xmath26 g m@xmath15 2 mm displacement @xmath27 g m@xmath15 scheme enhancement pendulum mass quadrupole comparison of typical night day force sensitivities of unbalanced quadrupole pendulum configuration measured force noise spectra shown in fig. human activity present close observed force noise factor 50 higher than instrumental limit when human activity reduced observe excess noise typical performance with reasonable tolerances of final 46 mm)@xmath3 tm assembly order 100 @xmath12 m or mass quadrupole moment pendulum reduced at by factor 300 compared to[noise : fig nightday gravity gradient noise negligible for pendulum performance test provides partial picture of gravity gradient noise experimental site possible pendulum assembling imperfections tilting vertical axis specific investigation test shows quadrupole gravity gradient noise relevant limitation for ultimate pendulum performance force sensitivity schematic new pendulum under construction : 3d cartoon final assembly top view schematic sketch of stiffness compensator '' 46 mm tms supporting shaft visible replica of ltp grs engineering model,height=207 working on integration of fully representative grs prototype tested facility new pendulum fig.[newpend under construction four @xmath28mm@xmath3 hollow tms one tm included into grs prototype ltp design additional capacitive sensor large gaps compensate tilt - twist coupling grs - stiffness opposite tm stiffness compensator support for optical read - out proposed collaborators @xcite two tms electrically isolated for capacitive readout actuation electrostatic homogeneity remaining two tms electrically grounded to rest pendulum fiber whole pendulum au - coated included tms cross shaped supportfacility grs prototypes ltp lisa full - size tms representative conditions flight mission direct measurement forces torques upper limits lisa force noise independent model noise source location grs sources force noise lisa tms straightforward evaluate model accurate verification lisa noise model bender p et al . lisa esa - sci(2000)11 weber w j._2002 4856 31 dolesi r._2003 class grav.*20 * s99 s quant . grav.*22 carbone l*91 151101 carbone l.*22 s509 carbone l class quant . grav.*21 carbone l 10@xmath29 marcel grossmann meeting general relativity gr - qc/0411049 y. su al._1994 phys . rev . * 50 * 3614 di fiore l. conference proceedings | 0.43873 | 2,878 | 1,415 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,048 | starting from axelrod s model of cultural dissemination , we introduce a rewiring probability , enabling agents to cut the links with their unfriendly neighbors if their cultural similarity is below a tolerance parameter . for low values of tolerance , rewiring promotes the convergence to a frozen monocultural state
. however , intermediate tolerance values prevent rewiring once the network is fragmented , resulting in a multicultural society even for values of initial cultural diversity in which the original axelrod model reaches globalization . | the growing interest in the interdisciplinary physics of complex systems , has focussed physicists attention on agent - based modeling @xcite of social dynamics , as a very attractive methodological framework for social sciences where concepts and tools from statistical physics turn out to be very appropriate @xcite for the analysis of the collective behaviors emerging from the social interactions of the agents .
the dynamical social phenomena of interest include residential segregation @xcite , cultural globalization @xcite , opinion formation @xcite , rumor spreading @xcite and others .
the question that motivates the formulation of axelrod s model for cultural dissemination @xcite is how cultural diversity among groups and individuals could survive despite the tendencies to become more and more alike as a result of social interactions .
the model assumes a highly non - biased scenario , where the culture of an agent is defined as a set of equally important cultural features , whose particular values ( traits ) can be transmitted ( by imitation ) among interacting agents .
it also assumes that the driving force of cultural dynamics is the `` homophile satisfaction '' , the agents commitment to become more similar to their neighbors .
moreover , the more cultural features an agent shares with a neighbor , the more likely the agent will imitate an uncommon feature s trait of the neighbor agent . in other words , the higher the cultural similarity , the higher the social influence . the simulations of the model dynamics show that for low initial cultural diversity , measured by the number @xmath0 of different traits for each cultural feature ( see below ) , the system converges to a global cultural state , while for @xmath0 above a critical value @xmath1 the system freezes in an absorbing state where different cultures persist .
the ( non - equilibrium ) phase transition @xcite between globalization and multiculturalism was first studied for a square planar geometry @xcite , but soon other network structures of social links @xcite were considered , as well as the effects of different types of noise ( `` cultural drift '' ) @xcite , external fields ( modeling _ e.g. _ influential media , or information feedback ) @xcite , and global or local non - uniform couplings @xcite . in all those extensions of axelrod s model mentioned in the above paragraph , the cultural dynamics occurs on a network of social contacts that is fixed from the outset . however , very often social networks are dynamical structures that continuously reshape . a simple mechanism of network reshaping is agents mobility , and a scenario ( named the axelrod - schelling model ) where cultural agents placed in culturally dissimilar environments are allowed to move has recently been analyzed @xcite . in this model ,
new interesting features of cultural evolution appear depending on the values of a parameter , the ( in-)tolerance , that controls the strength of agents mobility . a different mechanism of network reshaping has been considered in @xcite , where a cultural agent breaks its link to a completely dissimilar neighbor , redirecting it to a randomly chosen agent . at variance with the mobility scenario of the axelrod - schelling model , that limits the scope of network structures to clusters configurations on the starting structure ( square planar lattice , or others ) , the rewiring mechanism allows for a wider set of network structures to emerge in the co - evolution of culture and social ties . in this paper
we introduce in the scenario of network rewiring a tolerance parameter @xmath2 controlling the likelihood of links rewiring , in such a way that the limit @xmath3 recovers the case analyzed in @xcite , where only links with an associated null cultural overlap are broken .
lower values of @xmath2 correspond to less tolerant attitudes where social links with progressively higher values of the cultural overlap may be broken with some probability that depends on these values .
the results show a counterintuitive dependence of the tolerance @xmath2 on the critical value @xmath1 . on one hand , as expected from @xcite , rewiring promotes globalization for high values of the tolerance , but on the other hand , very low values of @xmath2 ( which enhance the rewiring probability ) show the higher values of @xmath1 .
indeed , a non monotonous behavior is observed in @xmath4 : our results unambiguously show that for some intermediate values of the tolerance @xmath2 , cultural globalization is disfavored with respect to the original axelrod s model where no rewiring of links is allowed . in other words , rewiring does not always promote globalization . on the other hand ,
the resulting network topology depends on @xmath0 , changing from a poisson connectivity distribution @xmath5 to a fat tailed distribution for @xmath6 .
as in axelrod s model , the culture of an agent @xmath7 is a vector of @xmath8 integer variables @xmath9 ( @xmath10 ) , called cultural _ features _ , that can take on @xmath0 values , @xmath11 , the cultural _ traits _ that the feature @xmath12 can assume .
the @xmath13 cultural agents occupy the nodes of a network of average degree @xmath14 whose links define the social contacts among them .
the dynamics is defined , at each time step , as follows : * each agent @xmath7 imitates an uncommon feature s trait of a randomly chosen neighbor @xmath15 with a probability equal to their _ cultural overlap _
@xmath16 , defined as the proportion of common cultural features , @xmath17 where @xmath18 denotes the kronecker s delta which is 1 if @xmath19 and 0 otherwise .
the whole set of @xmath13 agents perform this step in parallel . *
each agent @xmath7 disconnects its link with a randomly chosen neighbor agent @xmath15 with probability equal to its _ dissimilarity _ @xmath20 , provided the dissimilarity @xmath21 exceeds a threshold ( _ tolerance _ ) @xmath2 , @xmath22 and rewires it randomly to other non - neighbor agent .
the tolerance @xmath23 is a model parameter .
first we note that the initial total number of links in the network is preserved in the rewiring process , so the average degree @xmath14 remains constant .
however , the rewiring process allows for substantial modifications of the network topological features , _
e.g. _ connectedness , degree distribution , etc . in that respect , except for the limiting situation of very low initial cultural diversity @xmath0 and a very high tolerance @xmath2 ( where the likelihood of rewiring could be very low ) , one should expect that the choices for the initial network of social ties have no influence in the asymptotic behavior of the dynamics .
when the threshold tolerance @xmath2 satisfies @xmath24 , only those links among agents with zero cultural overlap are rewired , so the model becomes the one studied in @xcite .
on the other hand , when the tolerance takes the value @xmath25 , there is not rewiring likelihood and the original axelrod s model is recovered .
when @xmath26 rewiring is always possible provided the cultural similarity is not complete , _
@xmath27 , so that it corresponds to the highest intolerance .
the usual order parameter for axelrod s model is @xmath28 , where @xmath29 is the average ( over a large number of different random initial conditions ) of the number of agents sharing the most abundant ( dominant ) culture , and @xmath13 is the number of agents in the population .
large values of the order parameter characterize the globalization ( cultural consensus ) regime .
we also compute the normalized size @xmath30 of the largest network component ( _ i.e. _ , the largest connected subgraph of the network ) .
we have studied networks of sizes @xmath31 , @xmath32 ; averaging over @xmath33 - @xmath34 replicas .
the considered cultural vectors have @xmath35 cultural features , each one with a variability @xmath36 @xmath37 - @xmath38 .
we studied different values of the tolerance threshold @xmath39 and different values of the average connectivity @xmath40 .
each simulation is performed for @xmath13 , @xmath8 , @xmath14 , @xmath2 , and @xmath0 fixed .
for the sake of comparison with previous results @xcite , we will present results for @xmath41 .
the behavior of the order parameter for different values of @xmath2 is seen in fig .
[ k4_diff_z ] . like in @xcite ,
three different macroscopic phases are observed with increasing values of @xmath0 , namely a monocultural phase , with a giant cultural cluster , a multicultural one with disconnected monocultural domains , and finally a multicultural phase with continuous rewiring .
the nature of the latter phase has been successfully explained in @xcite : at very large values of the initial cultural diversity @xmath0 , the expected number of pairs of agents sharing at least one cultural trait becomes smaller than the total number of links in the network , so that rewiring can not stop .
here we will focus attention on the first two phases and the transition between them . in figure [ histog ]
we show the size distribution of the dominant culture over different realizations , measured for different values of @xmath0 , at a particular fixed value of the tolerance @xmath42 . in the region of @xmath0 values near the transition from globalization to multiculturalism ,
the distribution is double peaked , indicating that the transition is first order , as in the original axelrod s model .
the transition value , @xmath1 , may be roughly estimated as the @xmath0 value where the peaks of the size distribution are equal in height .
the estimates of the transition points for different values of the tolerance @xmath2 are shown in fig .
[ qc_vs_z ] .
the non monotonous character of the graph @xmath4 seen in this figure reveals a highly non trivial influence of the tolerance parameter on the co - evolution of cultural dynamics and the network of social ties .
let us first consider the ( most tolerant ) case @xmath43 that , except for the system size @xmath13 , coincides exactly with the situation considered in @xcite , _
i.e. _ , only links with zero cultural overlap are rewired . as discussed in @xcite , for @xmath0 values larger than the critical value for a fixed network ( @xmath44 )
, rewiring allows redirecting links with zero overlap to agents with some common cultural trait ( compatible agents ) , so reinforcing the power of social influence to reach cultural globalization .
once all links connect compatible agents , rewiring stops @xcite . from there on , the network structure will remain fixed , and globalization will be reached with the proviso that the network has so far remained connected .
this is the case for most realizations ( for @xmath31 ) up to values of @xmath45 .
increasing further the cultural diversity @xmath0 , increases the frequency of rewiring events and slows down the finding of compatible agents , favoring the topological fragmentation into network components before rewiring stops . under these conditions ,
the asymptotic state will consist of disconnected monocultural components .
on one hand , network plasticity allows to connect compatible agents , so promoting globalization ; but on the other hand it may produce network fragmentation , so favoring multiculturalism .
what we have seen in the previous paragraph is that for @xmath43 the first effect prevails over the second one up to @xmath46 .
going from there to less tolerant situations ( decreasing @xmath2 ) , increases the likelihood of rewiring , making easier that network fragmentation occurs before rewiring stops .
this has the effect of decreasing the critical value @xmath1 .
in fact , from fig
. [ qc_vs_z ] we see that for @xmath47 and @xmath48 multiculturalism prevails for cultural diversities where the original axelrod s model shows cultural globalization . in these cases
network plasticity promotes multiculturalism in a very efficient way : agents segregate from neighbors with low cultural similarity and form disconnected social groups where full local cultural consensus is easily achieved , for @xmath0 values low enough to allow a global culture in fixed connected networks . for very low values of the tolerance parameter ,
though network fragmentation occurs easily during the evolution , fig .
[ qc_vs_z ] shows that globalization persists up to very high values of the initial cultural diversity @xmath0 . to explain this seemingly paradoxical observation
, one must realize that network fragmentation is not an irreversible process , provided links connecting agents with high cultural overlap have a positive rewiring probability . under these circumstances , transient connections among different components
occur so frequently so as to make it possible a progressive cultural homogenization between components that otherwise would have separately reached different local consensuses .
[ time.evolution ] illustrates the time evolution for @xmath49 and different values of @xmath2 .
panel ( a ) shows an example of cultural evolution where network fragmentation reverts to a connected monocultural network for @xmath50 . panel ( b ) , that corresponds to @xmath51 , shows that social fragmentation persists during the whole evolution , while in panel ( c ) , which corresponds to the most tolerant situation ( @xmath43 ) , the network remains connected all the time .
the degree distribution of the network is poissonian centered about @xmath14 for all @xmath0 values , except for @xmath52 where it becomes fat tailed , with several lowly connected ( and disconnected ) sites .
for very high @xmath0 values , in the dynamical phase , the network rewiring is esentially random , so @xmath53 is again poisson like , centered around @xmath14 .
in this paper we have generalized the scenario for co - evolution of axelrod s cultural dynamics and network of social ties that was considered in @xcite , by introducing a tolerance parameter @xmath2 that controls the strength of network plasticity .
specifically , @xmath2 fixes the fraction of uncommon cultural features above which an agent breaks its tie with a neighbor ( with probability equal to the cultural dissimilarity ) , so that , the lower the @xmath2 value , the higher the social network plasticity .
our results show that the network plasticity , when controlled by the tolerance parameter , has competing effects on the formation of a global culture .
when tolerance is highest , network plasticity promotes cultural globalization for values of the initial cultural diversity where multiculturalism would have been the outcome for fixed networks . on the contrary , for intermediate values of the tolerance , the network plasticity produces the fragmentation of the ( artificial ) society into disconnected cultural groups for values of the initial cultural diversity where global cultural consensus would have occurred in fixed networks . for very low values of the tolerance ,
social fragmentation occurs during the system evolution , but the network plasticity is so high that it allows the final cultural homogenization of the transient groups for very high values of the cultural diversity .
intermediate tolerances promote multiculturalism , while both extreme intolerance and extreme tolerance favor the formation of a global culture , being the former more efficient than the latter .
this work has been partially supported by micinn through grants fis2008 - 01240 and fis2009 - 13364-c02 - 01 , and by comunidad de aragn ( spain ) through a grant to fenol group .
y. m. was partially supported by the fet - open project dynanets ( grant no .
233847 ) funded by the european commission and by comunidad de aragn ( spain ) through the project fmi22/10 . | growing interest in interdisciplinary physics of complex systems focussed on agent - based modeling of social dynamics attractive methodological framework for social sciences concepts tools from statistical physics appropriate for analysis of collective behaviors from social interactions agents social phenomena include residential segregation cultural globalization opinion formation rumor spreading question motivates axelrod s model for cultural dissemination is how cultural diversity among groups individuals survive despite tendencies social interactions model assumes non - biased scenario culture of agent defined as of important cultural features transmitted among interacting agents driving force of cultural dynamics is homophile satisfaction '' agents commitment to become similar to neighbors more cultural features agent shares with neighbor more likely uncommon neighbor higher cultural similarity higher social influence simulations model show for low initial cultural diversity system converges to global cultural state for above critical value system freezes in absorbing state where different cultures persist transition between globalization and multiculturalism first studied for square planar geometry soon other network structures of social links considered effects of noise cultural drift external fieldsinfluential media information feedback @xcite global non - uniform couplings extensions axelrod s model cultural dynamics occurs on network social contacts fixed often social networks dynamical continuously reshape mechanism network reshaping is agents mobility axelrod - schelling model cultural agents in dissimilar environments move analyzed @xcite new features cultural evolution appear depending on values parameter in-)tolerance agents mobility different mechanism network reshaping @xcite cultural agent breaks link to dissimilar neighbor redirecting to randomly chosen agent variance with mobility scenario axelrod - schelling model scope network structures to rewiring mechanism allows wider network structures co - evolution of culture social ties paper network rewiring tolerance parameter @xmath2 links rewiring limit @xmath3 recovers case only links with null cultural overlap broken lower values of @xmath2 correspond to less tolerant attitudes links with higher values cultural overlap broken results show counterintuitive dependence of tolerance @xmath2 on critical value @xmath1rewiring promotes globalization high values tolerance low values @xmath2 rewiring probability show higher values @xmath1 non monotonous behavior in @xmath4 results show intermediate values tolerance @xmath2 cultural globalization disfavored original axelrod s model no rewiring rewiring always promote globalization network topology depends on @xmath0 changing from poisson connectivity distribution @xmath5 to fat tailed distribution @xmath6 culture of agent @xmath7 vector of @xmath8 integer variables @xmath9 cultural _ features take on @xmath0 values @xmath13 cultural agents occupy nodes network average degree @xmath14 define social contacts dynamics defined each agent @xmath7 imitates uncommon feature trait chosen neighbor @xmath15 probability equal to cultural overlap _ @xmath16 proportion of common cultural features @xmath17 @xmath18 denotes kronecker s delta 1 if @xmath19 0 otherwise @xmath13 agents perform step in parallelagent @xmath7 disconnects link with neighbor agent @xmath15 probability equal to dissimilarity @xmath20 dissimilarity @xmath21 exceeds threshold tolerance @xmath2 @xmath22 rewires randomly to non - neighbor agent tolerance @xmath23 is model parameter initial number of links network preserved in rewiring average degree @xmath14 remains constant rewiring allows modifications of network topological features connectedness low cultural diversity @xmath0 high tolerance @xmath2 choices for initial network social ties no influence in asymptotic behavior dynamics threshold tolerance @xmath2 satisfies @xmath24 links among agents with zero cultural overlap rewired model becomes studied tolerance value @xmath25 rewiring likelihood original axelrod s model recovered @xmath26 rewiring possible cultural similarity not complete corresponds to highest intolerance usual order parameter for axelrod s model is @xmath28 @xmath29 average of number agents sharing abundant culture @xmath13 number of agents in population large values characterize globalization cultural consensus regime compute normalized size @xmath30 of largest network component largest connected subgraphstudied networks sizes @xmath31 @xmath32 averaging over @xmath33 - @xmath34 replicas cultural vectors have @xmath35 features variability @xmath36 @xmath37 - @xmath38 studied tolerance threshold @xmath39 average connectivity @xmath40 simulation performed for @xmath13 @xmath8 @xmath2 @xmath0 fixed comparison results for @xmath41 behavior order parameter for values @xmath2 in fig . [ k4_diff_z ] three phases observed with increasing values @xmath0 monocultural phase cluster multicultural disconnected domains multicultural phase continuous rewiring large values initial cultural diversity @xmath0 expected number pairs agents sharing one cultural trait smaller than total links network rewiring stop focus on first two phases transition figure [ size distribution dominant culture over realizations for different values @xmath0 at fixed value tolerance @xmath42 region @xmath0 values near transition from globalization to multiculturalism distribution double peaked transition first order transition value @xmath1 estimated as @xmath0 value where peaks size distribution equal in heightestimates transition points for values tolerance @xmath2 shown in fig ._z ] non monotonous graph @xmath4 reveals influence tolerance on cultural dynamics network social ties consider most tolerant case @xmath43 system size @xmath13 coincides with situation @xcite only links with zero cultural overlap rewired for @xmath0 values larger than critical value @xmath44 ) rewiring allows links zero overlap to common cultural trait compatible reinforcing social influence cultural globalization once all links connect compatible agents rewiring stops network structure fixed globalization reached proviso network remained connected for most realizations @xmath31 ) up to values @xmath45 increasing cultural diversity @xmath0 increases frequency rewiring slows finding compatible agents favoring topological fragmentation before rewiring stops asymptotic state disconnected monocultural components network plasticity allows compatible agents globalization network fragmentation multiculturalism for @xmath43 first effect prevails over second up to @xmath46 less tolerant situations decreasing @xmath2 ) increases likelihood rewiring network fragmentation before rewiring stopscritical value @xmath1 fig . qc_vs_z @xmath47 @xmath48 multiculturalism prevails for cultural diversities original axelrod s model shows cultural globalization network plasticity promotes multiculturalism agents segregate from low cultural similarity form disconnected social groups local cultural consensus achieved for @xmath0 values low global culture in networks low values tolerance parameter network fragmentation globalization persists up to high values initial cultural diversity @xmath0 network fragmentation not irreversible links connecting agents with high cultural overlap positive rewiring probability transient connections among components occur progressive cultural homogenization time.evolution ] illustrates evolution for @xmath49 values @xmath2 panel a ) network fragmentation reverts to connected monocultural network for @xmath50 panel b social fragmentation persists during evolution panel c most tolerant situation @xmath43 network remains connected degree distribution network centered about @xmath14 for all @xmath0 values except @xmath52 becomes fat tailed with several lowly connected disconnected siteshigh @xmath0 values dynamical phase network rewiring random @xmath53 centered around @xmath14 paper generalized scenario co - evolution axelrod s cultural dynamics network social ties @xcite introducing tolerance parameter @xmath2 controls network plasticity @xmath2 fixes fraction uncommon cultural features agent breaks tie neighbor probability equal dissimilarity lower @xmath2 value higher social network plasticity results show network plasticity controlled by tolerance competing effects global culture tolerance highest network plasticity promotes cultural globalization intermediate values network plasticity produces fragmentation disconnected cultural groups initial diversity low values tolerance social fragmentation occurs during system evolution network plasticity high allows final cultural homogenization for high values cultural diversity intermediate tolerances promote multiculturalism extreme intolerance tolerance favor global culture work partially supported by micinn grants fis2008 - 01240 fis2009 - 13364-c02 - 01 comunidad de aragn ( spain ) grant fenol group partially supported by fet - open project dynanets grant no . 233847 ) funded european commission comunidad de aragn spain ) project fmi22/10 | 0.515678 | 3,297 | 1,663 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,058 | we have measured the polarization of @xmath0 and @xmath1 inclusively produced by @xmath2 @xmath3 and @xmath4 proton beams in the experiment selex during the 1996/7 fixed target run at fermilab .
the polarization was measured as a function of the @xmath5 longitudinal momentum fraction @xmath6 and transverse momentum @xmath7 . for
the @xmath0 produced by @xmath3 the polarization is increasing with @xmath6 , from slightly negative at @xmath8 to about @xmath9 at large @xmath6 ; it shows a non - monotonic behavior as a function of @xmath7 . for the proton beam ,
the @xmath0 polarization is negative and decreasing as a function of @xmath6 and @xmath7 .
the @xmath1 polarization is compatible with @xmath10 for both beam particles over the full kinematic range .
the target dependence was examined but no statistically significant difference was found . | a large number of theoretical models have been constructed over the years since it was first observed that inclusively produced hyperons are polarized .
these models have met with varying degrees of success , but it is clear that more data and theoretical work are needed to clarify the picture .
a review of the current status is found in @xcite .
@xmath5 polarization is well studied with a proton beam , both in inclusive @xcite and exclusive @xcite reactions . for @xmath3 beam ,
only the wa89 experiment at cern reports polarization measurements for @xmath0 and @xmath1 as function of @xmath7 for one average value of @xmath6 @xcite , and for @xmath0 as function of both @xmath7 and @xmath6 @xcite . in the latter case
the polarization is negative for small @xmath6 , incrementing to positive values with @xmath6 , but with a non - monotonic behavior as a function of @xmath7 for different values of @xmath6 . in this study
we exploit the capabilities of the selex apparatus to measure the polarization of @xmath0 and @xmath1 inclusively produced by @xmath3 and proton beams .
the goal is to measure the polarizations as functions of @xmath6 and @xmath7 with higher beam momenta as the earlier wa89 measurement , using a different analysis method presenting different systematics , and extending the @xmath1 polarization measurements to several values in @xmath6 ; in addition , we add as a cross check the measurements with proton beam within the same experiment .
the selex ( e781 ) experiment at fermilab is a fixed target experiment designed primarily for high statistics studies of charmed baryons produced by a charged hyperon beam incident on a segmented copper / carbon target .
however , the versatility of the apparatus allowed for the study of other reactions @xcite in the same target . in this work
we study the polarization of inclusively produced @xmath0 and @xmath1 .
more specifically we determine the polarization and its @xmath6 and @xmath7 dependence .
we follow the basel convention @xcite for the sign of the polarization .
the charged hyperon beam , which we use as a primary beam for @xmath5 production , was obtained in the fermilab proton center beamline by steering @xmath11 protons from the tevatron onto a @xmath12 beryllium target located at the entrance of a @xmath13 , @xmath14 hyperon magnet @xcite .
a curved channel in this magnet selected a beam of negative ( positive ) particles with a mean momentum of @xmath2 ( @xmath15 ) and a spread of @xmath16 hwhm .
the negative beam consisted of approximately equal parts @xmath3 and @xmath17 with a small admixture of @xmath18 and @xmath19 , while the positive beam contained about @xmath20 protons , in a total of @xmath21 beam particles per second .
the targeting angle was set to zero degrees , thereby insuring an unpolarized incident beam . the portion of the experimental setup relevant to this analysis , which is shown in fig .
[ figapp ] , consisted of a beam spectrometer , a vertexing region and two downstream spectrometers ( m1 and m2 ) .
the beam spectrometer included the hyperon magnet , beam transition radiation detectors ( btrd ) and beam silicon strip detectors ( bssd ) .
the vertex region consisted of five segmented targets ( 2 cu , 3 c each separated by @xmath22 - altogether @xmath23 of an interaction length ) and 20 planes of vertex silicon strip detectors ( vssd ) , which resolved the interaction vertex and secondary vertices .
for vssd tracks , the transverse position resolution was @xmath24 at @xmath25 .
the m1 spectrometer was a wide angle spectrometer , designed to analyze particles with momenta between @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
this spectrometer contained the m1 magnet ( @xmath28 ) , large angle silicon strip detectors ( lasd ) , and proportional multi - wire chambers ( pwc ) . the second spectrometer ( m2 ) , downstream of m1 , analyzed particles with momenta @xmath29 .
its components were the m2 magnet ( @xmath30 ) , lasd , pwc , and a ring - imaging cherenkov ( rich ) detector @xcite used for particle identification , which provided @xmath31 separation up to @xmath32 .
a hardware trigger and software filter were used in selex to select the secondary interactions .
the hardware trigger consisted of the beam , veto and hodoscope scintillation counters .
the first level synchronized the trigger to beam particles .
the second level selected events where the btrd determined the beam particle was most likely a heavy particles ( @xmath3 or proton ) , with an additional refined definition in the analysis stage .
the beam interacted in one of the five targets , and more than 3 charged tracks were observed downstream of the target region of which at least 2 were positive tracks with momentum greater than @xmath27 .
triggered events accounted for @xmath33 of interactions .
a software filter looked for evidence of a secondary vertex and a reconstructed primary vertex using high momentum ( @xmath29 ) tracks .
the software filter further reduced the data set by a factor of 8 .
a sample of unfiltered data was always recorded for filter performance and systematic error analysis .
the @xmath34 ( @xmath35 ) candidates were selected by requiring oppositely charge track pairs to form a vertex at least @xmath36 downstream of the primary vertex , where @xmath37 is the combined error of the @xmath38-coordinates of the primary and secondary vertex , and upstream of the first vssd plane .
the positive ( negative ) track was required to be identified by the rich as a proton candidate . in fig .
[ signals ] we show the invariant mass distributions of these @xmath39 and @xmath40 candidates , and in table [ tab : yields ] we summarize the available statistics .
invariant mass distributions for @xmath39 ( left ) and @xmath40 ( right ) for @xmath3 ( top ) and proton ( bottom ) beams .
the signal and sideband regions are indicated.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] .[tab : yields ] number of @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath41 for the different beams . [ cols="^,>,>,>,>",options="header " , ]
for the inclusive production of @xmath0 by a @xmath3 beam , our results confirm the wa89 @xcite measurements ( obtained via the bias canceling method ) of a generally positive polarization , increasing with @xmath6 , as shown in fig .
[ fig : lamsigxf ] and [ fig : lamsigpt ] . at small @xmath7 and
@xmath42 the polarization is almost @xmath10 , and in general the dependence on @xmath7 is non - monotonic for different bins of @xmath6 , increasing and decreasing after reaching some maximum value . comparing to the earlier , lower - statistics wa89
@xcite result with the dependence on @xmath7 for @xmath43 ( fig .
[ fig : others ] , upper left and table [ tab : otherspt ] ) , we observe small polarization values confirming the previous measurement .
the authors of @xcite attribute the non - monotonic behavior of the polarization as function of @xmath7 and @xmath6 to different production mechanism in different kinematic regimes .
we also examined the target dependence , but no difference was found . for the polarization for @xmath0 produced by a proton beam as a function of @xmath7 ,
our results coincide with the higher statistics , but lower beam momentum , results from e008 @xcite . in fig .
[ fig : others ] ( upper right ) and table [ tab : othersxf ] we also present polarization results as a function of @xmath6 and compare them to our @xmath3 data .
the @xmath1 polarization is compatible with @xmath10 , for @xmath3 and proton beams for all @xmath7 values measured , as obtained in @xcite .
in addition we present also the polarization as function of @xmath6 ( fig .
[ fig : others ] ( lower right ) and table [ tab : othersxf ] ) . in conclusion , we measured the polarization of inclusively produced @xmath0 with a @xmath3 beam , and confirming the wa89 results with a different analysis method and higher beam momentum .
we do not observe any polarization of the @xmath1 at @xmath44 and @xmath45 .
the @xmath0 polarization with a proton beam is compatible with earlier results .
the authors are indebted to the staff of fermi national accelerator laboratory and for invaluable technical support from the staffs of collaborating institutions .
this project was supported in part by bundesministerium fr bildung , wissenschaft , forschung und technologie , consejo nacional de ciencia y tecnologa ( conacyt ) , the secretara de educacin pblica ( mexico ) ( grant number 2003 - 24 - 001 - 026 ) , fondo de apoyo a la investigacin ( uaslp ) , conselho nacional de desenvolvimento cientfico e tecnolgico , fundao de amparo pesquisa do estado de so paulo ( fapesp ) , the israel science foundation founded by the israel academy of sciences and humanities , istituto nazionale di fisica nucleare ( infn ) , the international science foundation ( isf ) , the national science foundation ( phy # 9602178 ) , nato ( grant cr6.941058 - 1360/94 ) , the russian academy of science , the russian ministry of science and technology , the russian foundation for basic research ( rfbr grant 05 - 02 - 17869 ) , the turkish scientific and technological research board ( tbitak ) , and the u.s .
department of energy ( doe grant de - fg02 - 91er40664 and doe contract number de - ac02 - 76cho3000 ) .
+ j. lach , nucl .
suppl . * 50 * , 216 ( 1996 ) .
j. felix , mod .
a * 12 * , 363 ( 1997 ) .
j. felix , mod .
a * 14 * , 827 ( 1999 ) .
j. felix , mod .
a * 16 * , 1741 ( 2001 ) .
k. j. heller _ et al .
_ , phys . rev
. lett . * 41 * , 607 ( 1978 ) [ erratum - ibid . *
45 * , 1043 ( 1980 ) ] .
j. felix _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 76 * , 22 ( 1996 ) .
j. felix _ et al .
_ , phys .
* 82 * , 5213 ( 1999 ) .
j. felix _ et al .
_ [ e690 collaboration ] , phys . rev .
* 88 * , 061801 ( 2002 ) .
m. i. adamovich _ et al . _
[ wa89 collaboration ] , z. phys .
a * 350 * , 379 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ex/9409001 ] .
m. i. adamovich _ et al . _
[ wa89 collaboration ] , eur .
j. c * 32 * , 221 ( 2004 ) .
p. pogodin _ et al .
_ [ selex collaboration ] , phys . rev .
d * 70 * , 112005 ( 2004 ) .
hughes _ et al . _ , ``
last page '' , proceedings of the international symposium on polarization phenomena of nucleons , basel , switzerland , july 1960 .
j. lach , `` e781 hyperon beam and targeting system , '' fermilab
tm2129 ( 2000 ) .
j. engelfried _ et al .
_ , nucl .
instrum . meth .
a * 431 * , 53 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ex/9811001 ] .
w. m. yao _ et al .
_ [ particle data group ] , j. phys .
g * 33 * , 1 ( 2006 ) .
j. l. sanchez - lopez , master thesis , instituto de fsica , universidad autnoma de san luis potos , 2006 .
fermilab - masters-2006 - 06
. k. d. nelson , ph.d .
thesis , university of iowa , 1999 .
fermilab - thesis-1999 - 55 .
j. engelfried , e. a. blanco , j. l. sanchez , selex internal note h-866 ( 2006 ) . | theoretical models constructed since produced hyperons polarized models varying success more data work needed review current status in @xcite @xmath5 polarization studied with proton beam inclusive reactions for @xmath3 beam wa89 experiment at cern reports polarization for @xmath0 @xmath1 function @xmath7 for @xmath6 @xmath0 @xmath7 latter polarization negative for small @xmath6 incrementing to positive with @xmath6 non - monotonic behavior function @xmath7 for different values selex apparatus to measure polarization of @xmath0 @xmath1 by @xmath3 proton beams goal to measure polarizations of @xmath6 and @xmath7 with higher beam momenta different analysis method systematics extending @xmath1 polarization measurements to several values in @xmath6 cross check measurements with proton beam selex ( e781 ) experiment at fermilab fixed target for high statistics studies of baryons charged hyperon beam copper carbon target versatility study other reactions @xcite same target study polarization of produced @xmath0 and @xmath1determine polarization @xmath6 @xmath7 dependence follow basel convention @xcite for sign polarization charged hyperon beam primary for @xmath5 production obtained fermilab proton center beamline steering @xmath11 protons from tevatron @xmath12 beryllium target entrance @xmath13 @xmath14 hyperon magnet @xcite curved channel selected beam negative particles mean momentum @xmath2 ( ) spread @xmath16 hwhm negative beam equal parts @xmath3 @xmath17 small admixture @xmath18 @xmath19 positive beam @xmath20 protons total @xmath21 beam particles per second targeting angle zero degrees unpolarized incident beam experimental setup fig . beam spectrometer vertexing region two downstream spectrometers m1 m2 beam spectrometer hyperon magnet beam transition radiation detectors silicon strip detectors vertex region five segmented targets interaction length 20 planes vertex silicon strip detectors interaction vertex vertices transverse position resolution @xmath24 at @xmath25 m1 spectrometer wide angle particles momenta between @xmath26 @xmath27spectrometer contained m1 magnet large angle silicon strip detectors proportional multi - wire chambers second spectrometer m2 analyzed particles with @xmath29 components m2 magnet lasd pwc ring - imaging detector for particle identification @xmath31 separation to @xmath32 hardware trigger software filter used secondary interactions hardware trigger beam veto hodoscope scintillation counters first level synchronized trigger to beam particles second level selected events heavy particles @xmath3 or proton beam interacted in five targets 3 charged tracks observed downstream target region 2 positive tracks with momentum greater than @xmath27 triggered events accounted for @xmath33 interactions software filter secondary vertex primary vertex using high momentum @xmath29 tracks reduced data set by factor 8 sample unfiltered data recorded for filter performance systematic error analysis @xmath34 @xmath35 ) candidates selected charge track pairs form vertex @xmath36 downstream of primary vertex @xmath37 combined error of @xmath38-coordinates upstream first vssd plane positive negative track identified as proton candidate figsignals show invariant mass distributions @xmath39 @xmath40 candidates table yields summarize statistics invariant mass distributions @xmath39 left @xmath40 right ) @xmath3 top proton bottom beams signal sideband regions indicated,scaledwidth=45.0% yields number @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath41 different beams cols=" inclusive production @xmath0 by @xmath3 beam results confirm wa89 @xcite measurements positive polarization increasing with @xmath6 fig . small @xmath7 @xmath42 polarization almost @xmath10 dependence on @xmath7 non - monotonic different bins @xmath6 increasing decreasing after maximum value comparing statistics @xcite result dependence on @xmath7 @xmath43 small polarization values confirming previous measurement authors attribute non - monotonic behavior polarization function @xmath7 @xmath6 different production mechanism kinematic regimes examined target dependence no difference found polarization @xmath0 produced proton beam function @xmath7 results coincide with higher lower beam momentum results from e008 @xcite fig .fig others upper right table tab othersxf present polarization results function @xmath6 compare @xmath3 data @xmath1 polarization compatible with @xmath10 @xmath3 proton beams @xmath7 values measured @xcite present polarization function @xmath6 fig others lower right table tab othersxf measured polarization @xmath0 @xmath3 beam wa89 results different analysis method higher beam momentum polarization @xmath1 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath0 polarization proton beam compatible earlier results authors indebted staff fermi national accelerator laboratory technical support collaborating institutionsproject supported by bundesministerium bildung wissenschaft consejo nacional de ciencia tecnologa secretara de educacin pblica grant 2003 - 24 - 001 - 026 fondo de apoyo investigacin conselho nacional de desenvolvimento cientfico tecnolgico fundao amparo pesquisa estado so paulo israel science foundation istituto nazionale di fisica nucleare international science foundation national science foundation nato grant cr6.941058 - 1360/94 russian academy of science ministry of science technology russian foundation for basic research 05 - 02 - 17869 turkish scientific technological research board u.s . department of energy grant fg02 - 91er40664 contract ac02 - 76cho3000 j. lach nucl . suppl. * 50 * 216 ( 1996 ) felix mod 12 363 ( 1997 ) 14 827 ( 1999 ) 16 1741 ( 2001 ) heller et phys . rev . lett 41 * , 607 ( 1978 ) 45 * 1043 ( 1980 ) felix phys 76 22 ( 1996 ) 82 5213 ( 1999 )e690 collaboration phys . rev 88 061801 2002 ) adamovich wa89 collaboration . 350 379 ( 1995 ) hep - ex/9409001 wa89 collaboration 32 221 ( 2004 ) pogodin selex collaboration phys . rev 70 112005 2004 ) hughes last page international symposium polarization phenomena nucleons basel switzerland july 1960 lach e781 hyperon beam targeting system fermilab tm2129 ( 2000 ) engelfried nucl . instrum. meth 431 53 ( 1999 ) hep - ex/9811001 yao particle data group j . g 33 1 2006 ) sanchez - lopez master thesis instituto fsica universidad autnoma san luis potos 2006 fermilab masters-2006 - 06 d nelson ph.d thesis university iowa 1999 fermilab thesis-1999 - 55 engelfried blanco sanchez selex internal note h-866 ( 2006 ) | 0.442801 | 2,917 | 1,483 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,061 | we compare the theoretical anisotropic upper critical field @xmath0 of a quasi - two - dimensional d - wave superconductor with recent @xmath1 data for the layered organic superconductor @xmath2 .
we find agreement both with regard to the angular and the temperature dependence of @xmath3 .
this supports the suggestion that the fulde - ferrell - larkin - ovchinnikov state ( fflo state ) exists in this material for exactly plane - parallel orientation of the magnetic field .
indications of precursor states , occurring for small deviations from the plane - parallel field direction , are also pointed out and further measurements for confirming the existence of the fflo state are proposed .
if the superconducting state in high magnetic fields is limited by paramagnetic pair breaking alone , the transition from the homogeneous superconducting state to the normal conducting state may proceed either directly , at the pauli limiting field @xmath4 , or via an interposed inhomogeneous superconducting state predicted in 1964 by fulde and ferrell [ 1 ] and by larkin and ovchinnikov [ 2 ] ( fflo state ) .
the latter state , which stabilizes as a consequence of spin polarization , has attracted considerable interest over the years , but has , despite of this , not yet been definitely verified experimentally .
favourable conditions for observing the fflo state are found in clean superconductors with orbital critical fields much larger than @xmath4 . in practice
, it seems always necessary to reduce the orbital pair breaking effect by using layered superconductors with nearly decoupled planes or extremely thin films ( quasi - two - dimensional superconductors ) and applying the magnetic field in a direction parallel to the conducting planes .
several classes of superconducting materials with favourable conditions for observing the fflo state do exist .
these include the `` classical '' intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides as well as more exotic materials like high-@xmath5 compounds and organic superconductors .
in this letter we refer to a recent measurement of the upper critical field @xmath1 in the organic superconductor @xmath2 [ 3 ] .
this layered material shows strong anisotropy of the superconducting properties with regard to out - of - plane directions .
in addition , a number of experiments listed in reference [ 3 ] are interpreted in terms of a strong in - plane anisotropy , of d - wave type , of the gap parameter .
the coherence length @xmath6 perpendicular to the layers of this clean material is smaller than the interlayer spacing @xmath7 and one expects an extreme reduction of orbital pair breaking for plane - parallel applied field .
the angular dependence of @xmath1 was measured in ref [ 3 ] both with respect to the angle @xmath8 between applied magnetic field and the direction normal to the conducting planes and with respect to the azimuthal angle @xmath9 , which denotes the direction of magnetic field lying within the plane .
the results showed , as expected , a strong variation of @xmath1 with @xmath8 . on the other hand ,
no dependence on @xmath9 was observed .
the maximal value of @xmath1 at the plane - parallel position @xmath10 was of the order of , but 50% higher than , the pauli paramagnetic limit @xmath4 .
these facts led the authors of reference [ 3 ] to propose that their in - plane critical field is the phase boundary between the normal - conducting state and the fflo state of a d - wave superconductor .
we examined this question by calculating the angular and temperature dependence of the theoretical phase boundary @xmath11 between the normal - conducting state and the superconducting states of a quasi - two - dimensional d - wave superconductor .
comparison with the data of reference [ 3 ] showed good agreement , supporting the hypothesis that in this experiment the phase boundary of a fflo state ( for d - wave superconductors ) has been observed for the first time .
we assume that the coupling between the conducting planes of @xmath2 can be neglected , making our problem effectively two - dimensional .
then , if the field has both a perpendicular and a parallel component , the superconducting state is limited by both orbital and paramagnetic pair breaking . for exactly plane - parallel magnetic field
the fflo phase should be realized below a reduced temperature ( @xmath12 ) of @xmath13 [ 4 ] .
such a situation , with competition between both pair breaking effects , has been studied first by bulaevskii [ 5 ] .
his treatment was later generalized to arbitrary temperatures and d - wave superconductors by shimahara and rainer [ 6 ] .
below the stability limit of the normal - conducting state , which will be referred to as @xmath11 , a series of different inhomogeneous superconducting states , depending on @xmath8 , appear .
for s - wave superconductors each one of these states belongs to a particular value of landau s quantum number @xmath14 , which takes integer values @xmath15 .
these states are ( for s - wave ) the following : * the vortex state for small @xmath8 belongs to @xmath16 . * a series of inhomogeneous states for @xmath8 near @xmath17 , each one characterized by a single value @xmath18 , with @xmath14 increasing with increasing @xmath8 . * the fflo state for @xmath10 , which may be characterized by @xmath19 .
the structure of the higher landau level states , for @xmath18 , has been calculated recently for s - wave superconductors by minimizing the quasiclassical free energy [ 7 ] . for d - wave superconductors [ 6 ]
a state below @xmath11 is no longer characterized by a single value of @xmath14 but rather by an infinite subset @xmath20 .
however , the dominant contribution may still be characterized by a single number @xmath14 , which increases again with increasing @xmath8 and approaches infinity in the fflo limit .
thus , basically the above classification scheme remains valid for d - wave symmetry .
the phase boundary of the ` pure ' fflo state for d - wave superconductors [ the curve @xmath21 has been calculated by maki and won [ 4 ] . the linearized gap equation to be solved
is given by [ 5,6 ] @xmath22 \right][1 \nonumber\\
- \cos[s\{\mu_0h - \frac{1}{2 } \vec{v}_f^\prime \vec{\pi}\ } ] ] \delta(\vec{r } ) \mbox{. } \end{aligned}\ ] ] we consider a cylindrical fermi surface , appropriate for the present two - dimensional problem , with the fermi velocity @xmath23 .
the gap parameter is given by @xmath24 , where @xmath25 for s - wave , and @xmath26 for d - wave pairing .
the canonical momentum is defined by @xmath27 .
the magnetic field @xmath28 is assumed to lie in the @xmath29-plane , with @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
we use the following gauge for the vector potential : @xmath32 .
paramagnetic pair breaking enters via the term @xmath33 in ( 1 ) ; the electron s magnetic moment is @xmath34 , with the lande factor @xmath35 and bohrs magneton @xmath36 . the method of reducing equation ( 1 ) to a set of algebraic equations follows exactly reference [ 6 ] and need not be repeated here . as a first check of our numerical method we compared our results with reference [ 6 ] and found complete agreement whenever the same set of input parameters was used .
let us proceed to a comparison of the solutions @xmath3 of equation ( 1 ) with the @xmath1 data reported in reference [ 3 ] .
the first point to address is the independence of @xmath1 on the azimuthal angle @xmath9 .
such a dependence may easily be incorporated in the present model by replacing @xmath37 in ( 1 ) by @xmath38 $ ] .
as long as orbital pair - breaking is present for a parallel field component , the symmetry - breaking term @xmath39 has to be kept in ( 1 ) .
if , on the other hand , complete decoupling of the ( infinitely thin ) conducting planes can be assumed , the term @xmath40 can be dropped and @xmath3 becomes independent of @xmath9 , as can be explicitely confirmed numerically . in this context
, we recall that a three - dimensional d - wave superconductor shows anisotropy of the upper critical field [ 8 ] .
thus , the observed independence of @xmath1 on @xmath9 is in agreement with the present model and , in particular , with the assumption of quasi - two - dimensional superconductivity . if @xmath41 is measured in units of @xmath5 and @xmath42 in units of @xmath43 ( where @xmath44 is the bcs - gap at @xmath45 ) , the present model requires only one single parameter @xmath46 to be fitted .
this parameter is proportional to the `` bulk '' ratio of the orbital and spin critical fields @xmath47 and @xmath48 respectively
. in the present anisotropic model the actual ratio of spin and orbital pair - breaking depends on @xmath8 and may be written in the form @xmath49 .
the best fit to the @xmath8-dependence of @xmath1 at @xmath50 ( see figure 4 of reference [ 3 ] ) has been obtained for @xmath51 .
this value of @xmath46 is consistent with a critical temperature @xmath52 of the sample studied in reference [ 3 ] , and a fermi energy of the order of @xmath53 as estimated from several experiments [ 9 ] . using this value we found very good agreement between @xmath54 and the data of reference
[ 3 ] , as shown in figure 1 .
the theoretical curves in figure 1 have been calculated assuming d - wave symmetry ; the difference between d - wave and s - wave was found to be small except very close to @xmath55 and @xmath56 .
, as a function of @xmath8 .
full squares : data of reference [ 3 ] at @xmath57 .
full line : theoretical result for the bulaevskii - shimahara - rainer phase boundary for @xmath58 . dashed line : theoretical result for @xmath59.,width=491 ] the @xmath1 data show a small but clearly visible kink near the plane - parallel orientation , at @xmath60 .
a similar feature is also found in the theoretical phase boundary @xmath61 , as shown in figure 1 ( where the square of the critical fields has been plotted in order to make this discontinuous change in slope better visible ) .
this kink indicates the transition from the vortex state , with @xmath16 , to the first of the above mentioned fflo - precursor states , with @xmath62 .
still closer to @xmath63 equation ( 1 ) yields additional transitions corresponding to @xmath64 , which are still visible in figure 1 in the theoretical curve but not in the data points .
the @xmath54-curves describing the @xmath65 transitions , for the same material but higher @xmath41 , are shown on a larger scale in figure 2 .
the order parameter structure of the precursor phases , where pairing takes place in landau levels @xmath18 , has been investigated recently for s - wave superconductors [ 7 ] .
two types of such precursor states have been found : ( i ) quasi - one - dimensional states , which may be considered as a mixture of rows of vortices and one - dimensional fflo - type oscillations , and ( ii ) two - dimensional lattices with several zeros of the order parameter with different vorticity [ 7 ] .
such unusual states [ of type ( ii ) ] have been predicted to occur in the extremely high field region where quantization of single electron levels becomes important [ 10 ] .
the present arrangement might provide a relatively feasible way of observing such vortex structures .
it should be mentioned , however , that for d - wave superconductors neither the equilibrium structure of the fflo state nor that of the @xmath18 states has been calculated so far . of the upper critical field , as calculated from equation ( 1 ) ,
are plotted in more detail , using the same value of @xmath66 as in figure 1 but a higher temperature @xmath67.,width=491 ] -dependence of the upper critical field of @xmath68 , as reported in reference [ 11 ] , with the solutions of equation ( 1 ) for s - wave superconductivity at @xmath69 and @xmath70.,width=491 ] the shape of the @xmath61 curve depends distinctively on temperature , as shown by the plot ( dashed line ) of @xmath71 at @xmath59 in figure 1 .
the reason for this enhancement at higher @xmath41 is , of course , that paramagnetic pair breaking becomes less effective at higher temperature .
data at higher @xmath41 have not been reported in reference [ 3 ] but would be useful in order to check the present interpretation . looking for similar measurements we found old data by morris and coleman
[ 11 ] for intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide @xmath68 samples . in this material , which represents a nearly perfect realization of two - dimensional superconductivity , an unexplained anomaly with regard to the behavior of the upper critical field at different @xmath41 has been reported ( figure 10 of reference [ 11 ] ) .
we find excellent agreement ( see figure 3 ) comparing the data of reference [ 11 ] with the solutions of equation ( 1 ) for an s - wave superconductor .
again , a single parameter has been adjusted ( @xmath72 ) to obtain both of the theoretical curves shown in figure 3 .
the resistance data reported in reference [ 11 ] show a non - monotonic behavior near the plane - parallel field orientation ( see figure 3 of reference [ 11 ] ) , which may be due to transitions to the @xmath18 states .
the latter states are discussed in more detail in reference [ 7 ] . with the theoretical result reported in reference [ 4].,width=491 ] finally ,
let us compare the measured temperature - dependence of @xmath1 for the plane - parallel field orientation ( figure 3 of reference [ 3 ] ) with @xmath73 .
according to our interpretation of these data , the states below @xmath74 should be a d - wave version of the fflo state for @xmath75 , and the homogeneous superconducting state for @xmath76 .
this phase boundary has been calculated first by maki and won [ 4 ] .
the shimahara rainer d - wave phase boundary must agree with reference [ 4 ] in the limit @xmath77 .
we found agreement , except for the steep rise of @xmath73 below @xmath78 reported in reference [ 4 ] ( a possible reason for this discrepancy may be slow convergence of our numerical method for low @xmath41 and high @xmath14 ) .
the comparison between theory [ 4 ] and experiment [ 3 ] depicted in figure 4 shows again fairly good agreement .
a characteristic difference in temperature variation above and below @xmath79 is visible in the data points , although it is less pronounced than in the theoretical curve .
the difference in critical fields between s - wave and d - wave is again rather small ; at @xmath80 , the lowest temperature , where measurements for @xmath2 have been reported [ 3 ] , both are approximately given by the standard @xmath81-result [ 12 ] for the fflo state , @xmath82 , which exceeds the pauli limiting field by @xmath83 .
thus , these numbers do also fit well into the fflo interpretation of the phase boundary for plane - parallel field orientation .
summarizing , the proposal of nam et al . [ 3 ]
that upper critical field data for a plane - parallel field orientation in the layered organic superconductor @xmath2 should be interpreted in terms of a fflo state , has been supported by our calculations .
the data agree with the predictions of a model of a quasi - two - dimensional superconductor both with regard to the angular and the temperature dependence of the critical field .
further confirmation of this interpretation could be obtained by means of measurements at higher temperatures , where paramagnetic pair - breaking is strongly reduced .
if this interpretation is correct , precursor states with interesting properties should appear for applied fields close to the plane - parallel orientation . | 0.000927 | 0 | 0 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. | ||
196,080 | i study the dynamics of the violation of the chsh inequality for two qubits interacting with a common zero - temperature non - markovian environment .
i demonstrate sudden violation of the inequality for two qubits initially prepared in a factorized state . due to the strong coupling between the qubits and the reservoir ,
the dynamics is characterized by numerous sharp revivals .
furthermore i focus on a more realistic physical system in which the spontaneous emission for the qubits is taken into account . when including spontaneous emission even for small decay parameters , revivals in the violation are heavily damped out .
if the decay rates exceed a certain threshold , the inequality turns out to be always satisfied . | the interaction of a quantum system with an environment is generally seen as source of decoherence , leading to the loss of quantum properties and the appearance of the classical world @xcite .
in fact , due to the creation of correlation with the environment , the evolution of the quantum system is not unitary any more .
if the system is prepared in an entangled state , such entanglement is very likely to be lost @xcite .
however , environments can also create correlations among quantum systems .
for example , the interaction of a bipartite system with a common reservoir creates correlations between the parts @xcite , irrespective of the existence of a direct coupling between them @xcite . in a shared environment
highly entangled long - living states , or even sub - radiant decoherence free states can exist @xcite .
many studies have demonstrated the existence of non - zero stationary entanglement in systems of two qubits or two harmonic oscillators sharing the same reservoir @xcite .
the ability to create correlations persists if the common reservoir has non zero temperature @xcite , and is increased by memory effects in non - markovian reservoirs @xcite . in the last decade
many efforts have been done to understand the dynamics of entanglement and quantum correlations in systems which are good candidates for applications in quantum information theory and technology . however
, not all the protocols in quantum information theory rely on entanglement . on the contrary , in many cases entanglement
is simply not enough and non - local properties , expressed by the violation of a bell inequality , are required . here
i study the non - local properties , namely the violation of the chsh inequality , of a system of two qubits interacting with a common non - markovian reservoir .
i consider a factorized state of the qubits with one excitation , and study , as a function of time and of the qubit - cavity coupling , the sudden violation of chsh inequality .
the conditions for which the violation is maximum are identified . afterwards i add another dynamical ingredient and study how the dynamics of the chsh violation gets modified when the spontaneous emission of the qubits is included .
the system under investigation comprises two qubits interacting with a common zero - temperature bosonic reservoir .
the hamiltonian of the system in rotating - wave approximation , and in units of @xmath0 , is @xmath1 , @xmath2 @xmath3 where @xmath4 and @xmath5 are the pauli raising and lowering operators for qubit 1 and 2 respectively , @xmath6 is the bohr frequency of the two identical qubits , @xmath7 and @xmath8 are dimensionless environment - qubit coupling constants , @xmath9 and @xmath10 , @xmath11 and @xmath12 are the annihilation and creation operators , the frequency and the coupling constant of the field mode @xmath13 , respectively . in the following
i assume that the two qubits interact resonantly with a lossy cavity , so i choose a lorentzian spectral distribution to describe the properties of the environment , @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the width of the spectral distribution describing the cavity losses , and @xmath16 in the limit of ideal cavity ( when @xmath17 ) is proportional to the vacuum rabi frequency @xmath18 through @xmath19 with @xmath20 the collective coupling constant .
the dynamics of two qubits interacting with a common lorentzian - structured reservoir has been studied in ref .
@xcite for the case of one excitation , and in ref .
@xcite for a generic state of two identically coupled qubits .
since here i consider the dynamics of a factorized state with one excitation of the form @xmath21 i am going to use the model of ref .
there the dynamics of the qubits is expressed in the basis of super - radiant and sub - radiant states @xmath22 @xmath23 where the relative coupling strengths @xmath24 and @xmath25 have been introduced ( @xmath26 ) .
considering the dynamics in such a basis is particularly convenient since the sub - radiante state does not evolve in time .
thus the evolution of the amplitudes of the first and second qubits is just @xmath27 @xmath28 with @xmath29 and @xmath30,\ ] ] where @xmath31 . in order to evaluate the time evolution of the violation of the chsh bell inequality i use the expression of ref .
@xcite , which allows one to express the maximum of the bell function ( by an appropriate choice of angles ) as function of the two - qubit density matrix elements . in the @xmath32 basis of the qubits , the maximum of the bell function reads as follows @xmath33 with @xmath34 where @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 and @xmath38 . for the particular initial state
considered i have @xmath39 and @xmath40 .
here i investigate the chsh inequality violation for two qubits prepared initially in the state @xmath41 i consider a cavity characterized by a high but experimentally feasible quality factor ( the width is @xmath42 , with @xmath43 the markovian decay rate of the qubits ) , and strong coupling conditions .
i set the parameter @xmath44 , indicating the strength of the coupling @xcite . in figure
[ fig : chsh ] i plot the chsh violation as a function of scaled time ( @xmath45 ) and of the relative coupling strength @xmath46 . during the evolution the system passes through highly entangled states , strongly violating the chsh inequality .
cycles of birth and death of non - locality follow one after the other , till for long times the inequality is finally satisfied .
the sudden appearance of the violation is consequence of the shared reservoir , providing an indirect coupling between the qubits .
such a reservoir - mediated interaction plays certainly a role also in the revivals of non - locality , which are also caused by the memory effects of the non - markovian reservoir .
i notice that sudden violation of the chsh inequality appears up to a certain value of the relative strength of the coupling .
in particular for the chosen coupling conditions no violation occurs when @xmath47 . for stronger coupling conditions the region of violation in the @xmath46 space of parameters widens , nevertheless it never reaches @xmath48 .
in fact for @xmath49 the qubits are symmetrically coupled to the cavity , and entanglement and non - local properties in general can not be created out of the factorized state in eq . .
( color online ) dynamics of the chsh inequality violation in a common lorentzian structured reservoir as a function of scaled time and relative coupling strength for two atoms prepared in a factorized state @xmath50 .
no spontaneous emission by the qubits is included.,width=453 ]
in this section i study how the dynamical violation of the chsh inequality is modified when including spontaneous emission for the two qubits . in ref .
@xcite i have studied the entanglement time evolution of two entangled qubits interacting with the same lorentzian structured reservoir ( leaky cavity ) and emitting independently outside the cavity due to spontaneous emission . by means of eqs .
( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of ref .
@xcite i have solved the dynamics in the case of qubits having the same transition frequency , equally and resonantly coupled with the cavity . here
i generalize that master equation to include the case of different couplings between the qubits and the cavity .
so the master equation describing the dynamics of our system ( with some renaming of parameters ) becomes : @xmath51 -\lambda(a^{\dag}a\tilde{\rho}+\tilde{\rho}a^{\dag}a-2a\tilde{\rho}a^{\dag})\nonumber\\ -\frac{{\gamma}_{1}}{2}({\sigma}_{+}^{(1)}{\sigma}_{-}^{(1)}\tilde{\rho}+\tilde{\rho}{\sigma}_{+}^{(1)}{\sigma}_{-}^{(1)}-2{\sigma}_{-}^{(1)}\tilde{\rho}{\sigma}_{+}^{(1)})\nonumber\\ -\frac{{\gamma}_{2}}{2}({\sigma}_{+}^{(2)}{\sigma}_{-}^{(2)}\tilde{\rho}+\tilde{\rho}{\sigma}_{+}^{(2)}{\sigma}_{-}^{(2)}-2{\sigma}_{-}^{(2)}\tilde{\rho}{\sigma}_{+}^{(2)}),\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath52.\ ] ] where @xmath4 and @xmath5 , @xmath53 , @xmath46 and @xmath54 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 have been defined above , while @xmath55 and @xmath56 are the annihilation and creation operators for the cavity mode and @xmath57 are the spontaneous emission rates for the two qubits . for the sake of simplicity
i assume @xmath58 .
as in the previous section i consider the sudden appearance of chsh violation for two qubits prepared in the state @xmath59 .
i study the dynamics for the same strong coupling conditions @xmath44 , in particular for the same width of the spectral distribution , and vacuum rabi frequency .
the two - qubit spontaneous emission decay rates are set equal to @xmath60 , therefore they are 50 times smaller than the vacuum rabi frequency @xmath18 . in figure
[ fig : chshspont ] i show the chsh violation as a function of time and of the relative coupling parameter @xmath46 .
the effect of spontaneous emission is apparent : the long series of sharp revivals is dramatically damped out . for the chosen spontaneous emission parameter
only one small revival is present .
the amount of violation of the chsh inequality reduces with increasing decay rate , and beyond a certain threshold value the chsh inequality is always satisfied . for the coupling conditions chosen such a threshold parameter
is @xmath61 .
( color online ) dynamics of the chsh inequality violation in a common lorentzian structured reservoir as a function of scaled time and relative coupling strength for two atoms prepared in a factorized state @xmath50 . here
spontaneous emission is included and the spontaneous emission decay rate of the qubits are equal to @xmath62 , i.e. , 50 times smaller than the vacuum rabi frequency @xmath63.,width=453 ]
i have investigated the time evolution of the violation of the chsh inequality for a system of two qubits interacting with a common lorentzian structured reservoir .
the reservoir - induced correlations between the qubits drive the evolution of an initial factorized state as @xmath59 towards highly entangled states , strongly violating the chsh inequality .
after cycles of birth and death of non - locality , progressively damped out , the chsh inequality becomes always satisfied . as a second step
i consider a more realistic system in which spontaneous emission of the two qubits is taken into account .
the time evolution of the chsh violation well describes the dramatic changes that the introduction of spontaneous emission in this model brings to the dynamics of the system .
birth of non - local properties appears only if the spontaneous emission decay rate is below a certain threshold , even in that case oscillations are strongly damped and the inequality becomes permanently satisfied much earlier .
the dynamics of the chsh violation was studied for a system of two non interacting initially entangled qubits in two independent non - markovian reservoirs @xcite . there ,
death and revivals of the violation have been observed due to the memory effects of the reservoirs . in that case
however , correlations between the qubits can not be created starting from a factorized state , as a consequence an initially separable state can not evolve into an entangled one , and possibly violating the chsh inequality .
i would like to thank s. maniscalco and j. piilo for enlightening discussions , g. compagno and his group in palermo for the kind hospitality and useful suggestions .
finally i thank m. ehrnrooth foundation for financial support . | interaction quantum system with environment decoherence to loss of quantum properties appearance classical world due to correlation with environment evolution quantum system not unitary if system in entangled state entanglement likely lost environments can create correlations among systems interaction bipartite system with common reservoir creates correlations between parts direct coupling in shared environment entangled long - living states sub - radiant decoherence free states can exist studies demonstrated non - zero stationary entanglement in systems two qubits oscillators sharing same reservoir correlations persists if reservoir has non zero temperature increased by memory effects in non - markovian reservoirs efforts to understand dynamics of entanglement quantum correlations in systems for applications quantum information theory technology not all protocols rely on entanglement many cases entanglement not enough non - local properties violation inequality required study non - local properties violation of chsh inequality of system of two qubits interacting with common non - markovian reservoir factorized state study sudden violation of chsh inequality conditions for violation maximum identifiedadd dynamical ingredient study dynamics chsh violation spontaneous emission qubits included system two qubits zero - temperature bosonic reservoir hamiltonian system rotating - wave approximation units @xmath0 @xmath1 pauli raising lowering operators qubit 1 2 @xmath6 bohr frequency qubits @xmath7 @xmath8 environment - qubit coupling constants @xmath9 annihilation creation operators frequency coupling constant field mode @xmath13 assume two qubits interact with lossy cavity choose lorentzian spectral distribution properties environment @xmath14 @xmath15 width spectral distribution cavity losses @xmath16 limit ideal cavity proportional to vacuum rabi frequency @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 collective coupling constant dynamics two qubits interacting lorentzian - structured reservoir studied in ref . @xcite one excitation generic state two identically coupled qubits consider dynamics factorized state one excitation form @xmath21 use model ref .dynamics of qubits expressed in super - radiant sub - radiant states @xmath22 @xmath23 relative coupling strengths @xmath24 @xmath25 introduced @xmath26 sub - radiante state evolve time evolution of amplitudes first second qubits @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 evaluate time evolution violation chsh bell inequality expression ref @xcite maximum bell function function two - qubit density matrix elements @xmath32 basis maximum bell function reads @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 initial state @xmath39 @xmath40 investigate chsh inequality violation for two qubits state @xmath41 high feasible quality factor width @xmath42 @xmath43 markovian decay rate strong coupling conditions set parameter @xmath44 strength coupling @xcite figure chsh chsh violation function of scaled time @xmath45 ) relative coupling strength @xmath46 evolution system passes through entangled states violating chsh inequality cycles of birth death non - locality follow inequality satisfiedsudden violation shared reservoir indirect coupling between qubits reservoir - mediated interaction revivals non - locality caused by memory effects non - markovian reservoir sudden violation chsh inequality appears up to relative strength coupling chosen coupling conditions no violation occurs when @xmath47 stronger coupling conditions region violation @xmath46 widens never reaches @xmath48 @xmath49 qubits symmetrically coupled to cavity entanglement non - local properties created factorized state dynamics chsh inequality violation in common lorentzian structured reservoir function of scaled time relative coupling strength two atoms factorized state @xmath50 no spontaneous emission qubits included dynamical violation chsh inequality including spontaneous emission for two qubits studied entanglement time evolution of two entangled qubits interacting same lorentzian reservoir emitting independently outside cavity due to spontaneous emission solved dynamics qubits same transition frequency equally coupled with cavity generalize equation different couplings between qubits cavitymaster equation dynamics system renaming parameters becomes @xmath51 -\lambda\dag}a\tilde{\rho}+\tilde\tilde) -\gamma}_{1}}{2}\sigma}_+{(1)}{\sigma}{(1)}\tilde{\rho}+\tilde{\rho}{(1)}}-2{\sigma}{(1)}\tilde{\rho}{\sigma}{+}^{(1)}{2}}{2}\sigma}{(2)}{(2)}\tilde{\rho}+{\rho}{(2)}{(2)}-2{\sigma}-{(2)}\tilde{\rho}{\sigma}_{+}^{(2){aligned with @xmath52 @xmath4 @xmath5 defined @xmath55 @xmath56 annihilation creation operators cavity mode @xmath57 spontaneous emission rates for two qubits assume @xmath58 sudden appearance chsh violation for two qubits @xmath59 study dynamics coupling conditions @xmath44 width spectral distribution vacuum rabi frequency two - qubit spontaneous emission decay rates equal to @xmath60 50 times smaller than vacuum rabi frequency @xmath18 figure chsh violation function time relative coupling parameter @xmath46 effect spontaneous emission sharp revivals damped out one small revival present violation chsh inequality reduces decay rate beyond threshold chsh inequality always satisfied coupling conditions threshold parameter @xmath61 dynamics chsh inequality violation common lorentzian structured reservoir function scaled time relative coupling strength two atoms factorized state @xmath50 spontaneous emission included decay rate qubits equal to @xmath62 50 times smaller than vacuum rabi frequency @xmath63 investigated time evolution violation chsh inequality two qubits common lorentzian structured reservoir reservoir - induced correlations qubits drive evolution @xmath59 towards entangled states violating chsh inequality after cycles birth death chsh inequality always satisfied consider realistic system spontaneous emission two qubitstime evolution of chsh violation describes changes spontaneous emission to dynamics birth of non - local properties appears if spontaneous emission decay rate below threshold oscillations damped inequality satisfied earlier dynamics chsh violation studied for system two non interacting entangled qubits in two independent non - markovian reservoirs death revivals observed due to memory effects correlations between qubits created from factorized state separable state evolve into entangled possibly violating chsh inequality s. maniscalco j. piilo discussions g. compagno group palermo hospitality suggestions m. ehrnrooth foundation for financial support | 0.43711 | 2,624 | 1,327 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,094 | we discuss the role of feedback via photoionization and compton heating in the co - evolution of massive black holes at the center of spheroidal galaxies and their stellar and gaseous components .
we first assess the energetics of the radiative feedback from a typical quasar on the ambient interstellar gas .
we then demonstrate that the observed @xmath0@xmath1 relation could be established at a relatively early epoch in galactic evolution when the formation of the stellar bulge was almost completed and the gas - to - stars mass ratio was reduced to a low level @xmath20.01 such that cooling could not keep up with radiative heating .
a considerable amount of gas was expelled at that time and black hole accretion proceeded at a much lower rate thereafter . | most elliptical galaxies are poor with respect to interstellar gas . also , elliptical galaxies invariably contain central massive black holes ( bhs ) , and there exists a tight relationship between the characteristic stellar velocity dispersion @xmath1 and the bh mass @xmath0 @xcite , and between @xmath0 and the host spheroid mass in stars , @xmath3 @xcite .
are these two facts related ? here we focus on a scenario in which the mass of the central bh grows within gas rich elliptical progenitors until star formation has reduced the gas fraction in the central regions to of order 1% of the stellar mass . then radiative feedback during episodes when the bh luminosity approaches its eddington limit drives much of the gas out of the galaxy , limiting both future growth of the bh and future star formation to low levels .
many works already recognized the importance of feedback as a key ingredient of the mutual bh and galaxy evolution @xcite .
what is new about this work is the stress on one component of the problem that has had relatively little attention : the radiative output of the central bh is not conjectural
it must have occured and the high energy component of that radiative output will have a dramatic and calculable effect in heating the gas in ellipticals . using the average quasar spectral output derived in @xcite , we show below and in more detail in @xcite that the limit on the central bh produced by the above argument coincides accurately with the observed @xmath0@xmath1 relation . not only the slope , but also the small normalization factor is nicely reproduced .
the present work is complementary to @xcite in that , while it does not attempt to model the complex flaring behavior of an accreting bh with an efficient hydrodynamical code , it does do a far more precise job of specifying the input spectrum and the detailed atomic physics required to understand the interaction between that spectrum and the ambient interstellar gas in elliptical galaxies .
below we assess the conditions required for the central bh radiation to significantly heat the ism over a substantial volume of the galaxy . in this section
we shall _ assume _ that the central bh has a mass as given by the observed @xmath0@xmath1 relation for local ellipticals and bulges @xcite : = 1.510 ^ 8()^4 .
[ sigma_mbh ] this assumption will be dropped in [ origin ] , where we _ predict _ the @xmath0@xmath1 relation . in @xcite
we computed for the average quasar spectrum the equilibrium temperature @xmath4 ( at which heating due to compton scattering and photoionization balances cooling due to line and continuum emission ) of gas of cosmic chemical composition as a function of the ionization parameter @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the bh bolometric luminosity . in the range @xmath7@xmath8k , ( )
210 ^ 2k , [ tstat_eq ] while at @xmath9 and @xmath10 , @xmath11k and @xmath12k , respectively . on the other hand ,
the galactic virial temperature is given by 3.010 ^ 6k ( ) ^2 .
[ tvir ] we can then find the critical density @xmath13 defined by ( l / r^2)=[ncrit ] as a function of distance @xmath14 from the bh .
gas with @xmath15 will be heated above @xmath16 and expelled from the galaxy .
we show in fig .
[ nr_tvir ] the resulting @xmath17 diagrams for a small and large bh / galaxy .
plane for a galaxy with @xmath18kms@xmath19 ( @xmath20k , @xmath21 , upper panel ) , and with @xmath22kms@xmath19 ( @xmath23k , @xmath24 , lower panel ) . in the dashed area , gas can be heated above @xmath16 by radiation from the central bh emitting at the eddington luminosity .
the upper boundary of this area scales linearly with luminosity .
vertical boundaries are @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 . ] in reality , provided that @xmath29 , significant heating will take place only out to a certain distance that depends on the luminosity and duration of the quasar outburst .
since the bh releases via accretion a finite total amount of energy , @xmath30 , there is a characteristic limiting distance : = ( ) ^1/2 = 400pc()^1/2 ( ) ^1/2 .
[ rc ] inside this radius , a low density , fully photoionized gas will be heated to the compton temperature @xmath31kev characteristic of the quasar spectral output .
more relevant for the problem at hand is the distance out to which low density gas will be compton heated to @xmath32 : r_1=()^1/2= 1,300pc()^1/2 .
[ r1 ] yet another characteristic radius is out to which gas of critical density @xmath13 will be heated to @xmath32 via photoinization and compton scattering : r_2=r_1 [ ( n_crit)/_c]^1/2 , [ r2 ] where @xmath33 and @xmath34 are the compton and total heating rates , respectively . depending on gas density ( @xmath35 ) , the outer boundary of the `` blowout region '' will be located somewhere between @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
the size of the heating zone can be compared with the galaxy effective radius ~4,000pc ( ) ^2 .
[ reff ] the different characteristic distances defined above are shown as a function of @xmath0 in fig .
[ mbh_radii ] .
one can see that a bh of mass @xmath36 should be able to unbind the ism out to several @xmath28 . in the case of more massive bhs / galaxies with @xmath37@xmath38
, the heating will be localized to innermost @xmath20.30.5@xmath28 .
( dotted line ) , @xmath26 ( short - dashed line ) , and @xmath27 ( long - dashed line ) , and the galactic effective radius ( solid line ) , as a function of @xmath0 . ]
we now consider the following general idea .
before the bh grows to a certain critical mass , @xmath39 , its radiation will be unable to efficiently heat the ambient gas , and the bh will accrete gas efficiently .
once the bh has grown to @xmath39 , its radiation will heat and expell a substantial amount of gas from the central regions .
feeding of the bh will then become self - regulated on a time scale of order the cooling time of the low density gas .
subsequent central activity will be characterized by a very small duty cycle ( @xmath20.001 ) , as predicted by hydrodynamical simulations @xcite and suggested by observations @xcite .
bh growth will be essentially terminated .
suppose that the galaxy density distribution is that of a singular isothermal sphere , with the gas density following the total density : _
gas(r)=. [ rho_gas ] here @xmath40 and @xmath41 are the gas mass and total mass within the region affected by radiative heating .
the size of the latter is uncertain but is less than a few kpc ( see [ heatfar ] ) , so that @xmath41 is dominated by stars rather than by dark matter .
radiation from the central bh can heat the ambient gas up to 6.510 ^ 3k ( ) ^-1 ( ) ^2 , [ tstat ] this approximate relation being valid in the range @xmath42@xmath8k .
remarkably , @xmath4 does not depend on distance for the adopted @xmath43 density distribution .
we then associate the transition from rapid bh growth to slow , feedback - limited bh growth with the critical condition = , [ tstat_tvir ] where @xmath44 and @xmath16 is given by ( [ tvir ] ) .
once heated to @xmath45 , the gas will stop feeding the bh .
the condition ( [ tstat_tvir ] ) will be met for = 4.610 ^ 10()^4 .
[ mcrit ] therefore , for fixed values of @xmath46 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 we expect @xmath49 , similarly to the observed @xmath0@xmath1 relation .
equally important is the normalization of the @xmath0@xmath1 relation . by comparing ( [ mcrit ] ) with ( [ sigma_mbh ] )
we find that the observed correlation will be established if /m=310 ^ -3 ^ -1l/. [ mgas_crit ] the gas - to - stars ratio is thus required to be low and approximately constant for spheroids of different mass at a certain stage of their evolution . as for the eddington ratio , it is reasonable to expect @xmath500.11 during quasar outbursts .
@xmath1 correlation resulting from heating of the ism by the radiation from the central bh assuming @xmath51 and @xmath52 .
thin solid line corresponds to @xmath53 and @xmath54 .
dashed line is the observed @xmath55 correlation in the range @xmath56a few @xmath38 , extrapolated to lower and higher bh masses .
dotted lines are @xmath57 and @xmath58 laws . ] the approximately linear @xmath59 dependence [ see ( [ tstat_eq ] ) ] was crucial to the above argument leading to the @xmath49 result . however , the @xmath59 function becomes nonlinear outside the range @xmath60 @xcite . in fig .
[ s_mbh ] we show the predicted correlation between @xmath39 and @xmath1 for @xmath61 and @xmath62 . it can be seen that the @xmath55 behavior is expected to break down for @xmath63 and for @xmath64 a few @xmath38 .
it is perhaps interesting that the range of masses shown in fig .
[ s_mbh ] for which @xmath55 is obtained from considerations of atomic phyisics ( and the observed agn spectra ) corresponds closely with the range of masses for which this power law provides a good fit to the observations . exploring the @xmath0@xmath1 relation observationally near @xmath38 would be a sensitive test of the importance of radiative feedback .
in @xcite we addressed in a more quantitative way the bh growth in the context of the parent galaxy evolution .
we adopted a physically - motivated one - zone model , taking into account the mass and energy return from the evolving stellar population .
this model predicts that after an initial `` cold '' phase dominated by gas infall , once the gas density becomes sufficiently low the gas heating dominates and the galaxy switches to a `` hot '' solution .
the gas mass / stellar mass ratio at that epoch ( @xmath20.003 ) is remarkably close to the value inferred above from the argument leading to the right @xmath0@xmath1 relation .
other predictions of the toy model are also in satisfactory agreement with observations .
the `` cold '' phase would probably be identified observationally with the lyman break and scuba galaxies , while the `` hot '' phase with normal , local ellipticals . | elliptical galaxies poor interstellar gas contain central massive black holes ( bhs ) tight relationship between stellar velocity dispersion @xmath1 bh mass @xmath0 @xcite @xmath0 host spheroid mass in stars @xmath3 @xcite focus on scenario mass central bh grows within gas rich elliptical progenitors until star formation reduced gas fraction to 1% stellar mass radiative feedback bh luminosity approaches eddington limit drives gas out limiting future growth bh star formation to low levels works recognized importance of feedback mutual bh galaxy evolution @xcite new work stress on component little attention radiative output of central bh not conjectural high energy component heating gas in ellipticals using average quasar spectral output in @xcite show limit on central bh coincides with @xmath0@xmath1 relation slope small normalization factor reproduced present work complementary to @xcite not model complex flaring behavior of accreting bh more precise input spectrum detailed atomic physics understand interaction between spectrum ambient interstellar gas in elliptical galaxies assess conditions for central bh radiation to heat ism over substantial volume galaxyassume central bh mass observed @xmath0@xmath1 relation for local ellipticals bulges = 1.510 ^ 8()^4 assumption dropped origin predict @xmath0@xmath1 relation computed average quasar spectrum equilibrium temperature @xmath4 heating balances cooling of gas cosmic chemical composition function ionization parameter @xmath5 @xmath6 bh bolometric luminosity range @xmath7@xmath8k 210 ^ 2k , @xmath9 @xmath10 galactic virial temperature 3.010 ^ 6k ( ) ^2 critical density @xmath13 ( l / r^2)=[ncrit ] function of distance @xmath14 from bh gas with @xmath15 heated above @xmath16 expelled from galaxy show fig . @xmath17 diagrams for small large bh / galaxy galaxy with @xmath18kms@xmath19 @xmath22kms dashed area gas heated above @xmath16 by radiation central bh eddington luminosity upper boundary scales linearly with luminosity vertical boundaries are @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 heating distance on luminosity duration quasar outburst bh releases finite energy @xmath30 limiting distance ^1/2 400pc()^1/2 inside radius low density photoionized gas heated to compton temperature @xmath31kev quasar spectral output relevant distance low density gas heated to @xmath32 : r_1=^1/2 1,300pc()^1/2 characteristic radius gas critical density @xmath13 heated to @xmath32 via photoinization compton scattering : r_2=r_1 n_crit/_c]^1/2 @xmath33 @xmath34 are compton total heating rates gas density @xmath35 outer boundary blowout region between @xmath26 and @xmath27 size heating zone compared with galaxy effective radius ~4,000pc ( ) ^2 characteristic distances function of @xmath0 in fig . mbh_radii bh mass @xmath36 unbind ism to @xmath28 more massive @xmath37@xmath38 heating localized to innermost @xmath20.30.5@xmath28 dotted line @xmath26 short @xmath27 long - galactic effective radius solid line function of @xmath0 consider idea before bh grows to critical mass @xmath39 radiation heat ambient gas bh accrete gas efficiently once bh grown to @xmath39 radiation heat expell gas from central regions feeding bh self - regulated cooling time low density gas central activity small duty cycle ( @xmath20.001 ) predicted by hydrodynamical simulations observations bh growth terminated galaxy density distribution singular isothermal sphere gas density following total density gas(r)= @xmath40 @xmath41 are gas mass total mass region affected radiative heating size latter uncertain less than few kpc @xmath41 dominated by stars dark matter radiation central bh heat ambient gas up to 6.510 ^ 3k ( ) ^-1 ( ) ^2 valid in range @xmath42@xmath8k @xmath4 depend on distance for @xmath43 density distribution associate transition from rapid to slow feedback - limited bh growth with critical condition @xmath44 @xmath16 once heated to @xmath45 gas feeding bhcondition tstat_tvir met for = 4.610 ^ 10()^4 fixed values @xmath46 expect @xmath49 @xmath0@xmath1 relation important normalization @xmath0 relation comparing mcrit with sigma_mbh observed correlation established if /m=310 ^ -3 ^ -1l/ gas - to - stars ratio low constant for spheroids different mass evolution eddington ratio expect @xmath500.11 during quasar outbursts @xmath1 correlation from heating ism by radiation central bh @xmath51 @xmath52 thin solid line @xmath53 @xmath54 dashed line @xmath55 correlation @xmath56a @xmath38 lower higher bh masses dotted lines @xmath57 @xmath58 laws linear @xmath59 dependence crucial @xmath49 result @xmath59 function nonlinear outside range @xmath60 @xcite fig . predicted correlation between @xmath39 @xmath1 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath55 behavior break down for @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath38 range of masses fig .s_mbh @xmath55 from atomic phyisics agn spectra corresponds with range masses power law observations exploring @xmath0@xmath1 relation near @xmath38 test importance radiative feedback @xcite addressed bh growth parent galaxy evolution adopted physically - motivated one - zone model mass energy return from evolving stellar population model predicts after initial cold phase gas infall gas density low gas heating dominates galaxy switches to hot '' solution gas mass / stellar mass ratio ( @xmath20.003 ) close to value @xmath0@xmath1 relation predictions toy model with observations cold '' phase identified with lyman break scuba galaxies hot '' phase with normal local ellipticals | 0.360658 | 2,458 | 1,311 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,103 | using a final state interaction model which describes the data on these two observables , at rhic , we make predictions at the lhc using the same cross - section and @xmath0-shift .
the increase in the medium density between these two energies ( by a factor close to three ) produces an increase of the fixed @xmath0 @xmath1 suppression by a factor 2 at large @xmath0 and of @xmath2 by a factor 1.5 .
-0.5 cm | final state interaction ( fsi ) effects have been observed in @xmath3 collisions .
they are responsible of strangeness enhancement , @xmath4 supression , fixed @xmath0 supression , azimuthal asymmetry , ... is it the manifestation of the formation of a new state of matter or can it be described in a fsi model with no reference to an equation of state , thermalization , hydrodynamics , ... ?
we take the latter view and try to describe all these obseervables within a unique formalism : the well known gain and loss differential equations .
we assume @xcite that , at least for particles with @xmath0 larger than @xmath5 , the interaction with the hot medium produces a @xmath0-shift @xmath6 towards lower values and thus the yield at a given @xmath0 is reduced .
there is also a gain term due to particles produced at @xmath7 . due to the strong decrease of the @xmath0-distributions with increasing @xmath0 ,
the loss is much larger than the gain .
asuming boost invariance and dilution of the densities in @xmath8 due to longitudinal expansion , we obtain [ 1e ] dn_^0 ( b , s , p _ ) d= - n(b , s ) here @xmath9 is the transverse density of the medium and @xmath10 the corresponding one of the @xmath1 @xcite .
this has to be integrated between initial time @xmath11 and freeze - out time @xmath12 .
the solution deepnds only on @xmath13 .
we use @xmath14 mb at both energies and @xmath15 for @xmath16 gev and @xmath17 for @xmath18 gev @xcite .
( [ 1e ] ) at small @xmath19 describes an interaction at the partonic level
. indeed , here the densities are very large and the hadrons not yet formed . at later times
the interaction is hadronic .
most of the effect takes place in the partonic phase .
we use a single ( effective ) value of @xmath20 for all values of the proper time @xmath19 .
the results at rhic and lhc are given in fig . 1 .
at lhc only shadowing @xcite has been included in the initial state .
the suppression is given by the dashed line .
it coincides with @xmath21 for @xmath0 large enough when shadowing and cronin efffects are no longer present .
the lhc suppression is thus a factor of two larger than at rhic .
= 7.5 cm = 7.45 cm -0.25 cm -7.45 cm = 7.5 cm = 7.45 cm -0.25 cm -0.3 cm
final state interaction in our approach gives rise to a positive @xmath2 @xcite ( no need for an equation of state or hydro ) .
indeed , when the @xmath1 is emitted at @xmath22 its path length is maximal ( maximal absorption ) . in order to compute it
we assume that the density of the hot medium is proportional to the path length @xmath23 of the @xmath1 inside the interaction region determined by its transverse position @xmath24 and its azimuthal angle @xmath25 .
hence , we replace @xmath26 by @xmath27@xmath28 where @xmath29 is the @xmath1 path length and @xmath30 denotes its average over @xmath25 .
( in this way the averaged transverse density @xmath26 is unchanged ) .
the suppression @xmath31 depends now on @xmath25 and @xmath2 is given by [ 2e ] v_2(b , p _ ) = d_r s_^0 ( b , p _ , _ r ) 2 _ r d_r s_^0 ( b , p _ , _ r ) the results at rhic and lhc are presented in fig .
99 a. capella , e. g. ferreiro , a. b. kaidalov and d. sousa , eur .
j. c * 40 * , 129 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0403081 ] .
a. capella and e. g. ferreiro , arxiv:0706.1880 [ hep - ph ] .
a. capella and e. g. ferreiro , phys .
c * 75 * , 024905 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0602196 ] . | state interaction effects observed in @xmath3 collisions responsible strangeness enhancement @xmath4 supression @xmath0 supression azimuthal asymmetry manifestation new state matter or fsi model no equation state thermalization hydrodynamics ? latter view gain and loss differential equations assume particles @xmath0 larger than interaction with hot medium produces @xmath0-shift towards lower values yield at reduced gain term due to particles at @xmath7 decrease @xmath0-distributions increasing @xmath0 loss larger than gain asuming boost invariance dilution densities in @xmath8 due to longitudinal expansion dn_^0 ( d= - n(b , s ) @xmath9 transverse density medium @xmath10 @xmath1 @xcite integrated between initial time @xmath11 freeze - out time @xmath12 solution deepnds on @xmath13 use @xmath14 mb at energies @xmath15 for @xmath16 gev @xmath17 @xmath18 gev @xmath19 interaction at partonic level densities large hadrons not formed later times interaction hadronic effect in partonic phaseuse single value @xmath20 for values time @xmath19 results at rhic lhc in fig . 1 lhc shadowing @xcite included initial state suppression by dashed line coincides with @xmath21 @xmath0 when shadowing cronin efffects no longer present lhc suppression factor two larger than rhic 7.5 cm = 7.45 cm -0.25 cm final state interaction positive @xmath2 @xcite no need equation state hydro @xmath1 emitted at @xmath22 path length maximal density hot medium proportional to path length @xmath23 @xmath1 determined by transverse position @xmath24 azimuthal angle @xmath25 replace @xmath26 by @xmath27@xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath1 path length @xmath30 average over @xmath25 averaged transverse density @xmath26 unchanged suppression @xmath31 depends on @xmath25 @xmath2 given by v_2(b p _ ) = d_r s_^0 results at rhic lhc in fig . 99 capella ferreiro kaidalov sousa 40 129 ( 2005 ) arxiv hep - ph/0403081capella e g. ferreiro arxiv:0706.1880 hep - ph phys c 75 024905 2007 ) hep - ph/0602196 | 0.179266 | 1,018 | 525 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,119 | we show that an appropriate generalization of the _ oriented area function _ is a perfect morse function on the space of three - dimensional configurations of an equilateral polygonal linkage with odd number of edges
. therefore cyclic equilateral polygons ( which appear as morse points ) are interpreted as independent generators of the homology groups of the ( decorated ) configuration space . | a morse function on a smooth manifold is called perfect if the number of critical points equals the sum of betti numbers .
not every manifold possesses a perfect morse function .
homological spheres ( that are not spheres ) do not possess it ; manifolds with torsions in homologies do not possess it , etc . on the other hand , the celebrated millnor - smale cancelation technique for critical points with neighbor indices ( or , equivalently , cancelation of handles )
provides a series of existence - type theorems @xcite which are the key tool in smale s proof of generalized poincare conjecture @xcite . in the paper we focus on one particular example of a perfect morse function and
discuss some related problems .
namely , we bound ourselves by the space of configuration of the equilateral polygonal linkage with odd number @xmath0 of edges . as the ambient space it makes sense to take either @xmath1 or @xmath2 , which gives us the spaces @xmath3 and @xmath4 . in bigger dimension
the configuration space is not a manifold .
the number @xmath5 is chosen to be odd by the same reason : for even @xmath5 , the configuration space of the equilateral polygonal linkage has singular points .
we are interested in finding a `` natural '' perfect morse function , that is , a function that has a transparent physical or geometrical meaning .
the first candidate of a `` natural '' morse function on @xmath3 was the oriented area function @xmath6 .
indeed , it a morse function with an easy description of its critical points as cyclic polygons ( that is , polygons with a superscribed circle ) , and a simple formula for the morse index of a critical point @xcite .
however , for @xmath3 @xmath6 is not perfect . in particular , for the equilateral pentagonal linkage it has one extra local maximum ( except for the global maximum ) and one extra local minimum , see example [ expentagon ] . for the equilateral heptagonal linkage
the number of morse points greatly exceeds the sum of betti numbers of the configuration space . to build up a perfect morse function
, we take the space @xmath4 and _ decorate _ it .
the decorated space @xmath7 is well adjusted for an appropriate generalization @xmath8 of the area function @xmath6 .
its critical points ( loosely speaking ) are again cyclic polygons .
surprisingly , the function @xmath8 is a perfect morse function . as a direct corollary we interpret cyclic equilateral polygons as independent generators of the homology groups of the configuration space @xmath7 .
for an odd @xmath0 an equilateral _ polygonal @xmath5-linkage _ should be interpreted as a collection of rigid bars of lengths @xmath9 joined consecutively by revolving joints in a chain . _ a configuration _ of the polygonal @xmath5-linkage in the euclidean space @xmath10
, @xmath11 is a sequence of points @xmath12 with @xmath13 and @xmath14 modulo the action of orientation preserving isometries of the space @xmath15 .
we also call @xmath16 a _ polygon_. a configuration carries a natural orientation which we indicate in figures by an arrow .
the set @xmath17 of all configurations up to an orientation - preserving isometry of the ambient space is _ the moduli space , or the configuration space of the polygonal linkage _ @xmath18 .
for @xmath19 the space @xmath17 is a smooth manifold .
we explain below in this paragraph what is known about planar configurations and the signed area function as the morse function on the configuration space .
[ dfn_area ] the _ signed area _ of a polygon @xmath20 with the vertices @xmath21 is defined by @xmath22 a polygon @xmath16 is _ cyclic _ if all its vertices @xmath23 lie on a circle .
cyclic polygons arise here as critical points of the signed area : a polygon @xmath16 is a critical point of the signed area function @xmath6 iff @xmath16 is a cyclic configuration .
their morse indices are known @xcite .
[ expentagon ] @xcite the equilateral pentagonal linkage has 14 cyclic configurations indicated in fig .
the convex regular pentagon and its mirror image are the global maximum and minimum of the signed area @xmath6 .
their morse indices are @xmath24 and @xmath25 respectively .
the starlike configurations are a local maximum and a local minimum of @xmath6 .
there are ten configurations that have three consecutive edges aligned .
their morse indices equal @xmath9 .
[ pentagon ]
the _ decorated configuration space _ is defined as the set of pairs @xmath27 factorized by the diagonal action of the orientation preserving isometries of @xmath2 .
here @xmath28 is the unit sphere centered at the origin @xmath29 . 1 .
the space @xmath7 is an orientable fibration over @xmath4 whose fiber is @xmath30 .
the euler class of the fibration equals zero . proof .
( 1 ) the set of all polygons with fixed sidelengths ( before factorization by isometries ) is known to be orientable .
therefore the set of the pairs ( a polygon , a vector ) is also orientable as a trivial fibration .
since we take a factor by the action of orientation preserving isometries , the result is also orientable .
\(2 ) @xmath31 defines a non - zero section .
the gysin sequence implies : [ cor_gisin ] 1 .
we have the following short exact sequence : @xmath32 2 . the homology groups @xmath33 are free abelian . for the betti numbers we have : @xmath34 [ dfn_arear3 ] let @xmath35 , let @xmath36 be the vertices of @xmath16 .
the _ area _ of the pair @xmath37 is defined as the scalar product : @xmath38 an alternative equivalent definition is : @xmath39 where @xmath40 is the plane orthogonal to @xmath41 and cooriented by @xmath41 .
[ thm_crirical_3d ] for an equilateral polygon with odd number of edges , critical points @xmath42 of the function @xmath8 are pairs @xmath42 such that @xmath16 is a planar cyclic polygon , and @xmath41 is orthogonal to the affine hull of @xmath16 .
if @xmath42 is a critical point , then @xmath43 is critical as well .
the paper @xcite contains a characterization of all critical points for a generic polygonal linkage ( which is not necessarily equilateral ) . in our particular case
it implies that critical points @xmath42 of the function @xmath8 fall into two classes : 1 .
* planar cyclic configurations .
* these are pairs @xmath42 such that @xmath16 is a planar cyclic polygon , and @xmath41 is orthogonal to the affine hull of @xmath16 .
* non - planar configurations .
* they are characterized by the three following conditions : 1 .
the vectors @xmath41 and @xmath44 are parallel ( but they can have opposite directions ) .
2 . the orthogonal projection of @xmath16 onto the plane @xmath45 is a cyclic polygon .
3 . for every @xmath46 ,
the vectors @xmath47 , @xmath48 , and @xmath49 are coplanar . + here
@xmath49 is the @xmath46-th short diagonal , @xmath47 is the vector area of the triangle @xmath50 .
let us show that the second class ( non - planar configurations ) is empty .
indeed , given a non - planar critical configuration , introduce a cartezian system with the @xmath51-axes parallel to @xmath41 .
the three conditions ( a ) , ( b ) , and ( c ) implie that the absolute value of the slope of an edge with respect to the plane @xmath52 does not depend on the edge .
this implies a contradiction with the closing condition : @xmath53 where the indices are modulo @xmath5 .
[ cor_perfectmorse ] 1 .
the function @xmath8 is a perfect morse function on the decorated configuration space @xmath54 for an equilateral linkage with odd number of edges . 2 .
each critical point of the function @xmath8 is a pair @xmath37 , where @xmath16 is a planar cyclic configuration , @xmath41 is a unit vector orthogonal to @xmath16 .
each planar cyclic configuration @xmath16 gives two critical points of the function @xmath8 ( with two different choices of the normal vector @xmath41 ) .
3 . the morse index of a critical point @xmath37 is @xmath55 where @xmath56 is the winding number @xmath16 around the center of the circumscribed circle,@xmath57 is the number of edges that go counterclockwise .
sets an orientation on the plane of the polygon , so it makes sense to speak of `` edges going clockwise '' and `` edges going counterclockwise '' . ] proof .
( _ i _ ) the second statement is already proven .
let us show that the number of critical points equals the sum of betti numbers .
the latter are already known due to a. klyachko @xcite : @xmath58 by corollary [ cor_gisin ] we have @xmath59 each equilateral cyclic @xmath5-gon with an orthogonal vector @xmath41 is defined by its winding number @xmath56 and by the set of edges that go clockwise .
assume that the winding number is positive ( negative values are treated by symmetry ) .
if the number of edges that go clockwise is @xmath57 , then the winding number ranges from @xmath60 to @xmath61 . for @xmath62 denote by @xmath63
the number of such cyclic equilateral polygons for which @xmath64 then @xmath65 ( _ iii _ ) straightforward analysis of the hesian matrix is very complicated ( probably impossible ) , so we use derive a combinatorial approach .
we prove the formula for morse index by induction by @xmath5 .
the base is given by equilateral pentagon .
by symmetry , we assume in whatfollows that we have a critical point @xmath37 such that @xmath66 , or , equivalently , with winding number @xmath67 . proof is based on two observations : \(1 ) there is a natural embedding of a neighborhood of @xmath16 in space @xmath3 to @xmath7 .
it sends a configuration @xmath16 to @xmath37 with the same @xmath16 and @xmath41 orthogonal to the affine hull of @xmath16 .
the direction of @xmath41 we choose in the way such that @xmath8 is positive .
let us choose a basis of the tangent space @xmath68 which starts by the pushforward of a basis of @xmath69 and ends by coordinates of @xmath41 .
the hessian matrix related to this basis is a block matrix : @xmath70 where @xmath71 is the @xmath72 hessian matrix of the planar polygon @xmath16 related to the area function @xmath6 and the space @xmath3 ; @xmath73 is the the @xmath74 unit matrix .
\(2 ) for an @xmath75-gon and a number @xmath76 , consider the embedding @xmath77 which keeps @xmath41 and replaces the edge number @xmath46 by a fold of three edges ( see fig . 1 , ( 3 ) for an equilateral triangle with an edge by a three - fold ) .
each critical point @xmath78 induces a critical point @xmath79 .
since the embedding has codimension two , and all morse indices can only be even , we have either @xmath80 , @xmath81 , or @xmath82
. more precisely , replacement of an edge replaced by a three - fold adds two extra columns to @xmath71 and two extra columns to @xmath83 .
we know from @xcite that the morse index of @xmath16 related to @xmath3 and the oriented area @xmath6 ( that is , the number of negative eigenvalues of @xmath71 ) equals @xmath84 .
it increases by one after replacement of an edge by a three - fold .
this only leaves the case @xmath81 .
these arguments allows to make an induction step @xmath85 and thus proves ( _ iii _ ) for all cyclic configurations with triple edges .
it remains to prove the formula for configurations without triple edges , that is , with all the edges going counterclockwise .
we keep assuming that @xmath66 , so there are exactly @xmath86 such polygons : with @xmath87 .
their morse indices should be @xmath88 , @xmath89 , @xmath90 , etc .
the only question is which configuration has one or the other index .
we know that @xmath71 contributes @xmath91 , @xmath92 , @xmath93 , etc . to each of the morse indices .
the block @xmath83 contributes not more than @xmath91 , and @xmath94 contributes exactly two .
the statement follows . as an illustration
, we list below all cyclic equilateral pentagons and heptagons .
the first column depicts a combinatorial type , the third one tells the number of configurations of this type , and the last one tells the morse index .
[ figure_7gon ]
decorated configuration space and the ares @xmath8 can be defined for a polygonal linkage that is not necessarily equilateral .
however , generically , the function @xmath8 is not a perfect morse function . in the paper
we omit the discussion about non - degenericity of critical points , since it appears to be somewhat technical .
however the following arguments work : we may replace the equilateral linkage @xmath95 by its perturbation @xmath96 has non - degenerate critical configurations that are close to above described equilateral ones .
this work is supported by the russian science foundation under grant 16 - 11 - 10039 .
klyachko a. , _ spatial polygons and stable configurations of points in the projective line .
_ tikhomirov , alexander ( ed . ) et al . , algebraic geometry and its applications .
proceedings of the 8th algebraic geometry conference , yaroslavl , russia , august 10 - 14 , 1992 .
braunschweig : vieweg .
aspects math .
e 25 , 67 - 84 ( 1994 ) . | morse function on smooth manifold perfect if critical points equals sum betti numbers not every manifold perfect morse function homological spheres manifolds with torsions millnor - smale cancelation technique for critical points with neighbor indices provides existence - type theorems key tool in smale s proof of generalized poincare conjecture paper focus on example perfect morse function discuss related problems bound by space of configuration of equilateral polygonal linkage with odd number @xmath0 of edges ambient space take either @xmath1 or @xmath2 spaces @xmath3 and @xmath4 configuration space not manifold number @xmath5 chosen odd configuration space has singular points interested in natural '' perfect morse function transparent physical or geometrical meaning first candidate of on @xmath3 was oriented area function @xmath6 morse function with easy description of critical points as cyclic polygons simple formula for morse index of critical point for @xmath3 @xmath6 not perfect for equilateral pentagonal linkage has one extra local maximum and one extra local minimumequilateral heptagonal linkage morse points exceeds betti numbers configuration space perfect morse function space @xmath4 decorate decorated space @xmath7 adjusted for generalization @xmath8 area function @xmath6 critical points cyclic polygons function @xmath8 perfect morse function interpret cyclic equilateral polygons independent generators homology groups configuration space @xmath7 odd @xmath0 equilateral polygonal @xmath5-linkage rigid bars lengths @xmath9 joined by revolving joints chain configuration polygonal @xmath5-linkage euclidean space @xmath10 @xmath11 sequence of points @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 orientation preserving isometries space @xmath15 @xmath16 polygon configuration carries natural orientation arrow set @xmath17 configurations orientation - preserving isometry moduli space polygonal linkage @xmath18 @xmath19 space @xmath17 smooth manifold planar configurations signed area function morse function configuration space signed polygon @xmath20 vertices @xmath21 defined by @xmath22 polygon @xmath16 cyclic if vertices @xmath23 lie on circlecyclic polygons critical points signed area polygon @xmath16 critical point @xmath6 cyclic configuration morse indices @xcite equilateral pentagonal linkage 14 cyclic configurations fig convex regular pentagon mirror image global maximum minimum signed area @xmath6 morse indices @xmath24 @xmath25 starlike configurations local maximum minimum @xmath6 ten configurations three consecutive edges aligned morse indices equal @xmath9 decorated configuration space set pairs @xmath27 factorized by diagonal action orientation preserving isometries @xmath2 @xmath28 unit sphere centered origin @xmath29 space @xmath7 orientable fibration over @xmath4 fiber @xmath30 euler class equals zero set polygons with fixed sidelengths before factorization orientable set pairs polygon vector orientable trivial fibration orientation preserving isometries result orientable @xmath31 defines non - zero section gysin sequence implies cor_gisin ] short sequence : @xmath32 homology groups @xmath33 free abelian betti numbers @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 vertices of @xmath16area of pair @xmath37 defined scalar product @xmath38 alternative definition @xmath39 @xmath40 orthogonal to @xmath41 cooriented by @xmath41_crirical_3d equilateral polygon odd edges critical points @xmath42 @xmath8 pairs @xmath42 @xmath16 planar cyclic polygon orthogonal to hull @xmath42 critical @xmath43 critical paper @xcite characterization critical points for generic polygonal linkage not equilateral implies critical points @xmath42 fall into two classes planar cyclic configurations pairs @xmath42 @xmath16 planar cyclic polygon orthogonal hull non - planar configurations characterized by three conditions vectors @xmath41 @xmath44 parallel opposite directions orthogonal projection of @xmath16 plane @xmath45 is cyclic polygon @xmath46 vectors @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 coplanar @xmath49 @xmath46-th short diagonal @xmath47 vector area of triangle @xmath50 second class ( non - planar configurations empty introduce cartezian system @xmath51-axes parallel to @xmath41three conditions a b c implie value slope edge plane @xmath52 depend on edge contradiction with closing condition @xmath53 indices modulo @xmath5_perfectmorse function @xmath8 perfect morse function on configuration space @xmath54 for equilateral linkage with odd number edges each critical point is pair @xmath37 @xmath16 planar cyclic configuration @xmath41 unit vector orthogonal to @xmath16 configuration gives two critical points two choices of normal vector @xmath41 morse index of critical point @xmath37 is @xmath55 @xmath56 is winding number @xmath16 around center circle@xmath57 number of edges counterclockwise sets orientation on plane polygon edges clockwise counterclockwise second statement proven number of critical points equals sum of betti numbers @xmath58 @xmath59 each equilateral cyclic @xmath5-gon with orthogonal vector @xmath41 defined by winding number @xmath56 set edges clockwise winding number positive negative values by symmetry if number edges clockwise is @xmath57 winding number ranges from @xmath60 to @xmath61@xmath62 denote @xmath63 number cyclic equilateral polygons @xmath64 @xmath65 analysis hesian matrix complicated combinatorial approach prove formula morse index induction @xmath5 base equilateral pentagon assume critical point @xmath37 @xmath66 winding number @xmath67 proof two observations natural embedding neighborhood @xmath16 space @xmath3 to @xmath7 sends configuration @xmath16 to @xmath37 @xmath16 @xmath41 orthogonal hull @xmath16 direction @xmath41 choose @xmath8 positive basis tangent space @xmath68 starts @xmath69 ends coordinates @xmath41 hessian matrix basis block matrix @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 hessian matrix planar polygon @xmath16 area function @xmath6 space @xmath3 @xmath73 @xmath74 unit matrix @xmath75-gon number @xmath76 consider embedding @xmath77 keeps @xmath41 replaces edge number @xmath46 fold three edges fig . 1 equilateral triangle three - fold critical point @xmath78 induces point @xmath79embedding has codimension two morse indices even @xmath80 or @xmath82 replacement edge three - fold adds two columns to @xmath71 @xmath83 morse index of @xmath16 related to @xmath3 oriented area @xmath6 negative eigenvalues @xmath71 equals @xmath84 increases one after replacement three - fold leaves case @xmath81 induction step @xmath85 proves cyclic configurations with triple edges prove formula for configurations without triple edges edges counterclockwise @xmath66 @xmath86 polygons with @xmath87 morse indices be @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 question which configuration has one or other index @xmath71 contributes @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 to morse indices block @xmath83 contributes not more than @xmath91 @xmath94 contributes two statement list cyclic equilateral pentagons heptagons first column combinatorial type third number of configurations last morse index figure_7gon ] decorated configuration space @xmath8 defined for polygonal linkage not equilateralfunction @xmath8 not perfect morse discussion non - degenericity critical points arguments work replace equilateral linkage @xmath95 @xmath96 non - degenerate configurations close equilateral supported russian science foundation grant 16 - 11 - 10039 klyachko spatial polygons stable configurations points projective line tikhomirov alexander algebraic geometry applications proceedings 8th algebraic geometry conference yaroslavl august 10 - 14 1992 braunschweig vieweg math 25 , 67 - 84 ( 1994 ) | 0.500242 | 3,266 | 1,729 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,122 | we demonstrate that the apparently _ ad hoc _ parametrization of the particle production spectra discussed in the literature and used in description of cosmic ray data can be _ derived _ from the information theory approach to multiparticle production processes .
in particular , the violation of the feynman scaling law can be interpreted as a manifestation of nonextensivity of the production processes .
[ 1999/12/01 v1.4c il nuovo cimento ] | the shape of the @xmath0 spectra of secondaries is of great importance in all investigations concerning developments of cosmic ray cascades @xcite ( cf . also @xcite ) .
the crucial problem of practical importance is the _ existence _ or _ nonexistence _ of the feynman scalling , which says that @xmath1-spectra of secondaries are energy independent . because in cosmic ray applications one is sensitive essentially to large @xmath1 region ( of , say , @xmath2 )
, the commonly used formula @xcite @xmath3 stresses this fact by power - like form with exponent obtained from the @xmath4 limit of fragmentation data @xcite . here
@xmath5 is parameter responsible for the feynman scaling violation whereas @xmath6 and @xmath7 are additional parameters obtained from the fit to data - all are energy dependent ( cf .
@xcite for details ) .
we shall demonstrate that ( [ eq : ao ] ) emerges in natural way from the information theory approach to hadronization processes presented in @xcite and extended to allow for the possible nonextensivity of the hadronization process by applying tsallis entropy @xcite .
( see @xcite for details of notion of nonextensivity and @xcite for its application to high energy reactions . ) .
in order to describe the hadronization process in information theory one uses @xcite the _ least biased and most plausible _ single particle distribution @xmath8 ( where @xmath9 is rapidity ) resulting from hadronization process in which a mass @xmath10 hadronizes into @xmath11 secondaries of mean transverse mass @xmath12 each ( for simplicity we consider only one - dimensional hadronization with limited transverse momenta which can , however , depend on @xmath10 and @xmath11 )
. this is done maximalizing the shannon ( or boltzmann - gibbs ) information entropy , @xmath13 , under constraints of normalization ( @xmath14 ) and energy conservation ( @xmath15 ) , which leads to the following ( extensive ) distribution function cf .
@xcite for details ) : @xmath16 .
\label{eq : maxent}\ ] ] here @xmath17 comes from the normalization of @xmath18 whereas the lagrange multiplier @xmath19 is to be calculated from the energy conservation constraint .
notice that _ there is no free parameter here_. this should be contrasted with the popular use of eq .
( [ eq : maxent ] ) as a `` thermodynamical parametrizations '' with inverse `` temperature '' @xmath20 beeing a free , positively defined parameter . in @xcite it was shown that , in a wide range of energies and multiplicities , @xmath21 .
however , the comparison with data can not be done in such model independent way because of the fluctuations of inelasticity @xmath22 ( given by inelasticity distribution @xmath23 @xcite ) causing fluctuations of @xmath10 and because of fluctuations of number of particles @xmath24 produced from a mass @xmath10 given by multiparticle distribution @xmath25 @xcite ( its actual shape accounts here for the possible multisource structure of the production process ) .
one has therefore @xmath26 , \label{eq : full}\ ] ] where @xmath27 is still calculated from the energy conservation constraint but now for a given event , i.e. , it is a fluctuating quantity with fluctuations resembling gamma - like distribution ( and characterised by mean value @xmath28 and normalised variance @xmath29 ) .
it has been shown in @xcite that such fluctuations of the parameter of the exponential distribution convert it to a power - like distribution : @xmath30 with @xmath31 in our case where @xmath32 and @xmath33 is a parameter connected with the mean value of @xmath34 .
this is precisely the form corresponding to distribution obtained using non - extensive tsallis @xmath35-entropy @xcite , instead of shannon one ( and reproducing it in the limit @xmath36 ) , @xmath37^q)/(1 - q ) \rightarrow
s_{q=1 } = - \int dy f(y ) \ln f(y)$ ] , together with the modified constraint equation @xmath38^q = m / n$ ] . using it
one gets instead of ( [ eq : maxent ] ) its nonextensive version : @xmath39^{\frac{1}{1-q } } .
\label{eq : maxentq}\ ] ] nonextensivity means that the entropy of the composition @xmath40 of two independent systems @xmath41 and @xmath42 is equal to @xcite @xmath43 proceeding to its usual additive form only in the @xmath44 limit .
it arises whenever in the system one enconters long - range correlations , memory effects or fractal structure of the corresponding space - time or phase space .
such situation is expected to occur also in the hadronization processes @xcite .
( 10.,11 . ) fig .
1 . comparison of eq .
( [ eq : form ] ) with ua5 @xcite data for @xmath44 and @xmath45 .
we make therefore the following conjecture : the convolution ( [ eq : full ] ) can , in practice , be replaced by the following simple one parameter formula of the type of eq .
( [ eq : ao ] ) which should be used to describe the existing data of @xcite : @xmath46^{\frac{1}{1-q}}. \label{eq : form}\ ] ] the only free parameter ( characterising the strenght of fluctuations in the system according to the previous discussion ) is the nonextensivity parameter @xmath35 . here
@xmath47 and @xmath48 is the mean ( single non - diffractive ) charged multiplicity at given energy @xmath49 .
notice that because @xmath50 is calculated from the energy conservation constraint which involves all produced particles ( i.e. , total multiplicity ) it is calculated here for @xmath51 particles . for the same reason care
must be taken when one addresses data at @xmath52 gev as part of them is for charged and part for neutral particles only . in both cases
the @xmath50 must be the same ( calculated for total multiplicity at given energy ) whereas multiplicity in front of the formula has to be chosen accordingly to the actual situation . in fig .
1 we show our results both for @xmath44 and our best fit with @xmath53 . in all calculations
the experimentally observed variation of @xmath54 with energy has also been accounted for by using the following simple interpolation formula : @xmath55 gev .
the results are reasonable , especially for @xmath56 and @xmath57 gev . for higher energies
our distributions start to be broader than data and this can not be improved by changing @xmath35 as diminishing its value in order to make distributions narrower will spoil the agreement with data for small rapidities .
it turns out that ua7 and p238 data can not be fitted together with ua5 data , as they demand a slightly bigger value of @xmath58 , cf .
2 . notice that p238 data are for charged and ua7 data for neutral particles therefore they must be described with , respectively , @xmath59 and @xmath60 in eq .
( [ eq : form ] ) , this leads to differences clearly seen in fig .
2 . ( 6.5,5.5 ) ( 6.5,5.5 ) ( 6.5,3 ) ( 6.5,3 )
our approach consists in noticing the striking similarity of eq .
( [ eq : maxentq ] ) to the eq .
( [ eq : ao ] ) of @xcite ( @xmath61 ) . fig .
3 shows the characteristic features of @xmath62 for the case of hadronization of fireball of mass @xmath63 gev into @xmath64 particles of transverse mass @xmath65 gev .
notice that for @xmath66 one obtains an increase of particle densities in the central region connected with its decrease at the edges of rapidity range - clearly resembling the characteristic pattern of feynman scaling violation .
we have replaced therefore the `` exact '' formula , ( [ eq : full ] ) by a one parameter fit represented by ( [ eq : form ] ) where @xmath35 summarizes the action of the averaging over the fluctuations caused by the initial conditions of reaction represented by the inelasticity and multiplicity distributions .
we find it very amazing that such simple approach coincides practically with empirical formula ( [ eq : ao ] ) and with only one parameter @xmath35 describes fairly well all data .
notice that @xmath53 is not very far from @xmath67 , which gives power @xmath68 in ( [ eq : ao ] ) .
notice also that our general formula allows for description of small @xmath1 region as well
. it would certainly be interesting to connect @xmath35 directly to the parameters describing inelasticity and multiplicity distributions or to descriptions of leading particles , for example of the type of that presented in @xcite .
our results seem to indicate that most probably parameter @xmath35 should be @xmath1-dependent reflecting different character of fluctuations of the quantity @xmath69 @xcite in the central ( mostly pionization ) and fragmentation regions .
this problem will be addressed elsewhere .
authors zw and gw are gratefull to the organizers of the _ chacaltaya meeting on cosmic ray physics _ for their support and hospitality . the partial support of polish committee for scientific research ( grants 2p03b 011 18 and 621/e-78/spub / cern / p-03/dz4/99 ) is acknowledged . | shape of @xmath0 spectra secondaries in investigations cosmic ray cascades crucial problem is existence or feynman scalling @xmath1-spectra secondaries energy independent cosmic ray applications sensitive to large @xmath1 region formula @xcite @xmath3 stresses power - like form exponent from @xmath4 limit fragmentation data @xmath5 for feynman scaling violation @xmath6 and @xmath7 additional parameters from data energy dependent demonstrate ( [ eq : ao ] ) emerges from information theory approach to hadronization processes nonextensivity applying tsallis entropy @xcite see @xcite for notion nonextensivity application to high energy reactions hadronization process uses least biased plausible single particle distribution @xmath8 @xmath9 is rapidity ) from mass @xmath10 hadronizes into @xmath11 secondaries transverse mass @xmath12 each one - dimensional hadronization with limited transverse momenta depend on @xmath10 and @xmath11maximalizing shannon information entropy @xmath13 under constraints normalization @xmath14 energy conservation @xmath15 leads to extensive distribution function @xcite details : @xmath16 maxent @xmath17 from normalization @xmath18 lagrange multiplier @xmath19 calculated from energy conservation constraint no free parameter contrasted with eq thermodynamical parametrizations with inverse temperature @xmath20 free defined parameter in @xcite shown wide range of energies multiplicities @xmath21 comparison with data fluctuations of inelasticity @xmath22 @xmath23 causing fluctuations @xmath10 fluctuations of number of particles @xmath24 mass multiparticle distribution @xmath25 @xcite multisource structure production process @xmath26 full @xmath27 calculated from energy conservation constraint for given event fluctuating quantity with fluctuations resembling gamma - like distribution characterised by mean value @xmath28 normalised variance @xmath29 shown in @xcite fluctuations of exponential distribution convert to power - like distribution : @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 connected with mean value of @xmath34form distribution using non - extensive tsallis @xmath35-entropy instead shannon one limit @xmath36 @xmath37^q)/(1 - q ) s_{q=1 } = - \int dy f(y ) \ln f(y)$ ] modified constraint equation @xmath38^q = m / n$ ] nonextensive version : @xmath39^{\frac{1}{1-q } nonextensivity means entropy of composition @xmath40 of systems @xmath41 and @xmath42 equal to @xcite @xmath43 additive form in @xmath44 limit arises long - range correlations memory effects fractal structure space - time phase space in hadronization processes fig 1 comparison of eq . form with @xcite data for @xmath44 and @xmath45 conjecture convolution eq : full ] replaced by one parameter formula data @xcite : @xmath46^{\frac{1}{1-q}} only free parameter strenght fluctuations nonextensivity parameter @xmath35 @xmath47 and @xmath48 is mean - charged multiplicity at given energy @xmath49 @xmath50 calculated from energy conservation constraint all produced particles multiplicity calculated for @xmath51 particles care data at @xmath52 gev part for charged neutral particles only both @xmath50 same calculated for total multiplicity at given energy multiplicity in front of formula chosen actual situation fig . 1 results for @xmath44 and fit with @xmath53 variation of @xmath54 with energy accounted for interpolation formula : @xmath55 gev results reasonable especially for @xmath56 and @xmath57 gev for higher energies distributions broader not improved by changing @xmath35 agreement with data for small rapidities ua7 and p238 data not fitted with ua5 data demand bigger value of @xmath58 p238 data for charged ua7 data for neutral particles must described with @xmath59 and @xmath60 in eq . leads to differences seen in fig . 2 . ( 6.5,5.5 approach similarity of eq . maxentq to @xcite ( @xmath61 ) fig .shows characteristic features @xmath62 hadronization fireball mass @xmath63 gev @xmath64 particles transverse mass @xmath65 gev @xmath66 increase particle densities central region decrease edges rapidity range resembling feynman scaling violation replaced formula [ eq : full ] one parameter fit [ eq : form ] @xmath35 summarizes action averaging fluctuations initial conditions reaction inelasticity multiplicity distributions approach coincides empirical formula [ eq : ao ] one parameter @xmath35 describes all data @xmath53 not far from @xmath67 gives power @xmath68 [ eq : ao ] ) general formula allows description small @xmath1 region connect @xmath35 parameters inelasticity multiplicity distributions descriptions leading particles @xcite results indicate parameter @xmath35 @xmath1-dependent fluctuations quantity @xmath69 @xcite central fragmentation regions problem addressed elsewhere authors zw gw organizers chacaltaya meeting cosmic ray physics support partial support polish committee scientific research grants 2p03b 011 18 621/e-78/spub p-03/dz4/99 acknowledged | 0.316914 | 2,120 | 1,121 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,123 | the role of the nucleon resonances in the double polarization observables of pion photoproduction is investigated by using the resonance parameters predicted by capstick and roberts . as an example
, we show that the not - well - determined two - star resonance n@xmath0(1960 ) can be examined by performing experiments on beam - recoil polarization at large angles . | constituent quark models have been widely used to predict the properties of baryon resonances . however , a large number of resonance states which appear in the constituent quark models have not been observed in pion - nucleon scattering .
it has been argued @xcite that such `` missing resonances '' either decouple from the pion - nucleon channel or are masked by the neighboring resonances which have large @xmath1 decay widths .
this has led to suggestions that other reaction channels such as vector meson productions@xcite might be more sensitive to these missing states .
however , all possibilities have not been exhausted in the @xmath2 n channel .
one such possibility is to consider the polarization observables .
while efforts@xcite are being made to measure the single polarizations , it will be interesting to explore double polarizations which could be more effective in revealing some of the missing resonances through the interference between the resonant and background(non - resonant ) amplitudes .
investigations of these double polarization observables is timely and topical as they coincide with the availability of new opportunities to measure them at jefferson lab and other laboratories . as a step in this direction ,
we will explore in this paper how the double polarization observables of pion photoproduction can be used to investigate nucleon resonances in the higher energy region ( 1.6 @xmath3 2.1 gev ) in which a lot of missing resonances have been suggested . in this energy region , a complete dynamical approach to pion photoproduction , such as that developed@xcite in the investigation of the @xmath4 resonance , is still being developed .
the main difficulty is due to the large number of resonance states and the complexities of the couplings between several meson - baryon channels . for our present very limited purpose
, we will introduce some rather drastic simplifications in using a formulation which is a direct extension of the dynamical formulation of ref.@xcite .
this will then allow us to address the question concerning the missing resonances by relating the resonant amplitude directly to the predictions from a constituent quark model .
as an example , we will consider the predictions by capstick and roberts@xcite . in section
ii , we will give explicitly the formulation used in our calculations .
our findings will be discussed in section iii .
the differential cross section of @xmath5 in the center of mass ( c.m . ) frame can be written as , @xmath6 and @xmath7 are respectively the momenta of the incident photon and outgoing pion , and @xmath8 , @xmath9 , and @xmath10 are the spin projections of the initial nucleon , final nucleon , and incoming photon , respectively . for a total invariant mass @xmath11 ,
the momenta @xmath12 and @xmath13 are @xmath14 , \nonumber \\ q&=&\frac{1}{2\sqrt{s}}[(s - m_n^2-m_\pi^2)^2 - 4m_n^2m_\pi^2]^{1/2},\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath15 and @xmath16 are the masses for the nucleon and pion respectively .
the photon laboratory energy @xmath17 is @xmath18\end{aligned}\ ] ] following the formulation of ref .
@xcite , we write the pion photoproduction amplitude as @xmath19.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this work , we assume that the total amplitude @xmath20 of eq.(3 ) can be calculated from the multipole amplitude generated by the said program@xcite .
these empirical amplitudes are obtained by the following procedure . for each partial wave ,
the multipole amplitude is written as a sum of the conventional born term , vector - meson - exchange , and a many - parameter phenomenological term .
the amplitudes are unitarized by using the empirical @xmath1 phase shifts which are also available in the said program .
the empirical pion photoproduction multipole amplitude are then obtained by adjusting the parameters of the phenomenological term to perform @xmath21-fits to all of the existing data of @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath24 reactions from threshold up to invariant mass w=2.1 gev . in this work
we use the sm01 solutions@xcite from their energy - dependent fits .
more details about the said program can be found in refs.@xcite and @xcite . following the formulation of ref .
@xcite , we write the resonant amplitude as @xmath25 @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the mass of a @xmath28 with spin quantum numbers @xmath29 . here
we neglect the effect due to the non - resonant mechanisms on the @xmath28 decay amplitude and the shift of the resonance position .
then the resonance mass @xmath30 and the @xmath28 decay amplitude @xmath31 can be identified with the predictions from a quark model , as discussed in refs .
@xcite .
we however do not have information about the total decay width @xmath32 for most of the @xmath28 s considered here . for simplicity , we assume that its energy - dependence is similar to the width of the @xmath33 decay within the oscillator constituent quark model .
following ref . @xcite and neglecting the real part of the mass shift , we then have @xmath34 , \label{n*:decay}\ ] ] where @xmath35 is the orbital angular momentum of the considered @xmath1 state and @xmath36 in the above equations , @xmath37 is the pion momentum at energy @xmath38 while the on - shell momentum @xmath39 is evaluated at @xmath40 .
the energies are defined by @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
our choice of the total average width @xmath43 and cutoff parameter @xmath44 for eq .
( [ n*:decay ] ) will be specified in sec .
iii . by setting the photon momentum in the @xmath45-direction , the @xmath46 amplitude ( @xmath47 ) in eq .
( [ t : n * ] ) can be calculated from the helicity amplitude @xmath48 listed in ref .
@xcite @xmath49 the @xmath50 amplitude ( @xmath51 ) takes the following form @xcite @xmath52 where @xmath53 is the @xmath2 meson momentum at @xmath54 .
here we also include an extrapolation factor @xmath55 $ ] similar to that for defining the width eq.(5 ) . by using the information in refs.@xcite
, we can get helicity amplitude @xmath56 of eq.(7 ) and partial - wave transition strength @xmath57 of eq.(8 ) predicted by capstick and roberts .
the resulting values for the considered 30 @xmath28 and 26 @xmath58 are listed in tables i - iv .
our first task is to calculate the resonant amplitude defined by eqs .
( [ resampeq])-([omegan * ] ) . with the helicity amplitude @xmath56 and partial - wave transition strength @xmath57 given in tables i - iv
, this amplitude depends only on the choice of the total width @xmath43 and the cutoff @xmath44 in eqs.(5 ) and ( 8) . for simplicity
, we set @xmath44 = 650 mev for all resonances considered .
this value is close to what was determined in the investigation of @xmath59@xcite .
the widths of the known @xmath28 resonances listed in @xcite range from 200 - 400 mev .
we therefore take their average value and set @xmath60 mev for all @xmath28 resonances listed in tables i - ii . for the similar reason
, we set @xmath61 mev for the considered @xmath58 resonances listed in tables iii - iv . with these specifications , the resonant amplitude eq.(4 ) can be computed with no adjustable parameters . since the full amplitude @xmath20 is taken from
said program , the non - resonant(background ) amplitude @xmath62 for our investigation can then be fixed by @xmath63.\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the background amplitude defined above , we then use eq.(2 ) to investigate the role of each resonance in determining the resonance amplitude . in fig .
[ amp ] , we first observe that the differential cross sections(solid curves ) calculated from the employed said amplitude agree well with the available data .
the dashed curves are obtained when the the effects due to all of the considered 56 resonance states are removed .
we see that the nucleon resonance effects on the unpolarized differential cross sections are not very pronounced .
furthermore none of the considered resonances listed in tables i - iv dominate the difference between the full calculation(solid curves ) and the background only calculation(dashed curves ) .
obviously , it is not easy to investigate the nucleon resonances by only considering the unpolarized differential cross sections .
this is similar to the finding of ref.@xcite in a investigation of @xmath64 photoproduction .
we now turn to reporting our investigations of the polarization observables .
before we discussing the double polarization observables , we show in fig . 2 some typical results from our calculations of single polarization observables .
as expected , the effects due to nucleon resonances are much more visible here .
hopefully , these predictions can be tested in the near future when the data from the on - going experiments become available . where @xmath67 is the cross - section @xmath68 and the superscripts @xmath69 denote the polarizations of the beam , target ; recoil and meson respectively .
@xmath70 corresponds to a circularly polarized photon beam with helicity + 1 , @xmath71 represents the direction of the nucleon polarization , and u represents the unpolarized particle .
the coordinate system is chosen such that the incoming photon is in the z - direction and x - z plane is the reaction plane .
thus y - direction is perpendicular to the reaction plane .
we have performed extensive calculations of the two double polarization observables , @xmath72 and @xmath73 , in the energy region 1.6 gev @xmath74 w @xmath75 2.1 gev . as expected ,
the resonance effects are much more pronounced than what can be observed in fig.1 for the unpolarized differential cross sections or fig.2 . for the single polarization observables .
this is illustrated in fig.3 for the beam - target polarization and fig.4 for the beam - recoil polarization for two typical angles at 90 and 120 degrees .
our next task is to explore the favorable kinematic regions where only one or just a limited number of nucleon resonances among the 56 considered resonance states will dominant . we have found that at angles close to 120 degrees the resonance effects on the beam - recoil polarization ( eq.(11 ) ) are mainly due to the four - star resonances @xmath76 of table i and @xmath77 and @xmath78 of table ii , and the two - star resonance @xmath79 of table ii . furthermore the @xmath79 state has the largest effect among about 50 two - star and missing resonances in this higher energy region .
this is shown in fig.5 .
we see that by adding only the two - star @xmath79 to the calculation including only background and three four - star resonances , the predicted beam - recoil polarizations are shifted from the dashed curves to the dot - dashed curves which are close to the results from full calculations including all resonances listed in tables i - iv .
the investigation of the two - star @xmath79 is clearly most favorable in the @xmath22 channel .
our results suggest that data on the double polarization observables of pion photoproduction in the region 1.6 @xmath80 w @xmath802.1 gev could be very useful in investigating nucleon resonances .
the experiments on these observables would be complementary to other similarly motivated ongoing experiments on vector meson photoproduction and kaon photoproduction .
moreover , these double polarization observables should be accessible at facilities such as jefferson lab and spring-8 . to end , we like to mention that some experimental data on double polarization observables have recently become available in the @xmath81 channel for w @xmath82 1.6 gev @xcite , but there is no data on the other two charged channels .
z. li , ph.d thesis * an analysis of pion photoproduction * , virginia polytechnic institute and state university , 1992 .
t. yoshimoto , t. sato , m. arima , and t .- s .
h. lee , phys .
c * 61 * , 065203 ( 2000 ) . .
parameters for positive parity nucleon resonances from refs .
the helicity amplitude @xmath56 is given in unit of @xmath83 gev@xmath84 .
@xmath57 is in unit of mev@xmath85 .
the resonance mass @xmath27 is in unit of mev . [
cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] | constituent quark models used predict baryon resonances large number resonance states not observed in pion - nucleon scattering argued missing resonances decouple from pion - nucleon channel or masked by neighboring resonances large decay widths led to suggestions other reaction channels vector meson might be sensitive to missing states all possibilities not exhausted in @xmath2 n channel possibility consider polarization observables efforts measure single polarizations explore double polarizations revealing missing resonances resonant investigations of double polarization observables timely coincide with new opportunities to measure at jefferson lab other laboratories explore double polarization observables investigate nucleon resonances in higher energy region ( 1.6 @xmath3 2.1 gev ) missing resonances suggested in complete dynamical approach to pion photoproduction still being developed difficulty due to large number of resonance states complexities of couplings between meson - baryon channels for introduce drastic simplifications formulation extension of dynamical formulation of ref.@xcite address question missing resonances by relating resonant amplitude to predictions from constituent quark modelconsider predictions by capstick roberts@xcite section ii formulation calculations findings discussed section iii differential cross section of @xmath5 in center mass frame written as @xmath6 @xmath7 momenta of incident photon outgoing pion @xmath8 spin projections of initial nucleon final nucleon incoming photon total invariant mass @xmath11 momenta @xmath12 @xmath13 are @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 masses for nucleon pion photon laboratory energy @xmath17 is @xmath18 formulation write pion photoproduction amplitude as @xmath19. total amplitude @xmath20 of eq.(3 ) calculated from multipole amplitude generated by program@xcite empirical amplitudes obtained each partial wave multipole amplitude written as sum of conventional born term vector - meson - exchange many - parameter phenomenological term amplitudes unitarized empirical @xmath1 phase shifts available in programempirical pion photoproduction multipole amplitude obtained adjusting parameters phenomenological term @xmath21-fits to data @xmath22 reactions invariant mass w=2.1 gev use sm01 solutions@xcite energy - dependent fits details in refs.@xcite resonant amplitude as @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 mass @xmath28 spin quantum numbers @xmath29 neglect effect non - resonant mechanisms on @xmath28 decay amplitude shift resonance position resonance mass @xmath30 @xmath28 decay amplitude @xmath31 identified with predictions quark model information total decay width @xmath32 for @xmath28 s assume energy - dependence similar to width @xmath33 decay oscillator quark model @xmath34:decay @xmath35 orbital angular momentum of @xmath1 state @xmath36 @xmath37 pion momentum at energy @xmath38 on - shell momentum @xmath39 at @xmath40 energies defined by @xmath41 and @xmath42 choice of total average width @xmath43 cutoff parameter @xmath44 for:decay specified in secsetting photon momentum @xmath45-direction @xmath46 amplitude calculated from helicity amplitude @xmath48 @xmath50 amplitude @xmath51 @xmath53 @xmath2 meson momentum @xmath54 extrapolation factor @xmath55 defining width information refs.@xcite helicity amplitude @xmath56 eq.(7 ) partial - wave transition strength @xmath57 eq.(8 ) predicted capstick roberts resulting values 30 @xmath28 26 @xmath58 tables i - iv calculate resonant amplitude eqs resampeq)-([omegan ) helicity amplitude @xmath56 partial - wave transition strength @xmath57 tables i - iv depends on total width @xmath43 cutoff @xmath44 eqs.(5 ) 8) set @xmath44 = 650 mev all resonances close to investigation @xmath59@xcite widths @xmath28 resonances range 200 - 400 mev average set @xmath60 mev for all @xmath28 resonances tables - ii set @xmath61 mev for @xmath58 resonances tables iii - iv resonant amplitude(4 ) computed no adjustable parameters full amplitude @xmath20 from program non - resonant amplitude @xmath62 fixed by @xmath63. background amplitude use eq.(2 ) investigate role each resonance resonance amplitude fig . [ differential cross sections curves from amplitude agree with data dashed curves obtained when effects 56 resonance states removed nucleon resonance effects on unpolarized differential cross sections not pronounced none resonances in tables i - iv dominate difference between full calculation background calculation not easy investigate nucleon resonances unpolarized differential cross sections similar to finding ref.@xcite investigation @xmath64 photoproduction reporting investigations polarization observables fig . 2 typical results from calculations single polarization observables effects due to nucleon resonances more visible predictions tested data experiments available @xmath67 cross - section @xmath68 superscripts @xmath69 denote polarizations beam target recoil meson @xmath70 circularly polarized photon beam helicity + 1 @xmath71 direction nucleon polarization u unpolarized particlecoordinate system chosen incoming photon z - direction x - z plane reaction plane y - direction perpendicular to reaction plane performed calculations double polarization observables @xmath72 @xmath73 energy region 1.6 gev @xmath74 @xmath75 2.1 gev resonance effects pronounced fig.1 unpolarized differential cross sections single polarization observables illustrated.3 beam - target polarization fig.4 beam - recoil polarization angles 90 120 degrees next task explore favorable kinematic regions nucleon resonances 56 resonance states angles close to 120 degrees resonance effects beam - recoil polarization due to four - star resonances @xmath76 @xmath77 two - star resonance @xmath79 @xmath79 state largest effect among 50 two - star missing resonances higher energy region shown in fig.5 adding two - star @xmath79 calculation predicted beam - recoil polarizations shifted from dashed to dot - dashed curves calculations investigation two - star @xmath79 favorable in @xmath22 channelresults suggest data double polarization observables pion photoproduction region 1.6 @xmath80 @xmath802.1 gev useful investigating nucleon resonances experiments complementary to experiments vector meson kaon photoproduction observables accessible at jefferson lab spring-8 experimental data available @xmath81 channel @xmath82 1.6 gev @xcite no data other two charged channels z. li ph.d thesis analysis pion photoproduction virginia polytechnic institute state university 1992 t. yoshimoto sato arima lee . c * 61 * 065203 2000 ) parameters positive parity nucleon resonances helicity amplitude @xmath56 unit @xmath83 gev@xmath84 @xmath57 unit mev@xmath85 resonance mass @xmath27 unit mev | 0.434271 | 2,891 | 1,469 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,127 | the parton momentum densities in the proton are determined from a nlo qcd analysis of structure functions measured by hera and fixed target experiments . also included
are data on the difference of the up and down anti - quark densities .
the uncertainties in the parton densities , structure functions and related cross sections are estimated from the experimental errors , taking into account all correlations .
standard model predictions of the charged current born cross sections at large @xmath0 and @xmath1 are calculated and compared with recent data from zeus . | with the integrated luminosity of about 50 pb@xmath2 collected at hera during the years 19941997 a new kinematic domain of large @xmath0 and @xmath1 becomes accessible for the study of deep inelastic scattering in @xmath3 collisions .
measurements by zeus of the @xmath4 single differential neutral current ( nc ) and charged current ( cc ) born cross sections for @xmath5 gev@xmath6 have recently become available @xcite .
standard model ( sm ) predictions calculated with , for instance , the parton distribution set cteq4 @xcite are in good agreement with the nc cross sections but fall below the cc measurements at large @xmath0 and @xmath1 .
this could be an indication of new physics beyond the sm but might also be due to an imperfect knowledge of the parton densities in this kinematic region .
for instance in @xcite it is shown that a modification of the cteq4 down quark density yields sm predictions in agreement with the cc @xmath4 data . to investigate these issues
we have performed a global nlo qcd analysis @xcite of structure function data to obtain the parton densities in the proton .
a full error analysis provides estimates of the uncertainties in these parton densities , the structure functions and the sm predictions of the nc and cc cross sections .
the data used in the fit are @xmath7 from zeus @xcite and h1 @xcite together with @xmath7 , @xmath8 @xcite and @xmath9 @xcite from fixed target experiments .
also included were neutrino data on @xmath10 @xcite for @xmath11 and data on the difference @xmath12 @xcite .
after cuts the data cover a kinematic range of @xmath13 , @xmath14 gev@xmath6 and @xmath15 gev@xmath6 .
both @xmath8 and @xmath9 as well as @xmath10 were corrected for nuclear effects using the parameterization of @xcite for deuterium ( with an assumed uncertainty of 100% ) and that of @xcite for iron ( assumed uncertainty 50% ) .
the qcd predictions for the structure functions were obtained by solving the qcd evolution equations in nlo in the scheme @xcite . at the scale @xmath16 gev@xmath6 the gluon density ( @xmath17 ) , the sea and valence quark densities ( @xmath18 ) and the difference @xmath12 were parameterized in the standard way @xcite ( 16 free parameters ) .
the strange quark density was taken to be a fraction @xmath19 of the sea @xcite .
the normalizations of the parton densities were constrained such that the momentum sum rule and the valence quark counting rules are satisfied .
the charm and bottom quarks were assumed to be massless and were generated dynamically above the thresholds @xmath20 and @xmath21 gev@xmath6 respectively .
the value of the strong coupling constant was set to @xmath22 .
higher twist contributions to @xmath7 and @xmath8 were taken into account phenomenologically by describing these structure functions as @xmath23\ ] ] where @xmath24 obeys the nlo qcd evolution equations and where @xmath25 was parameterized as a fourth degree polynomial in @xmath0 ( 5 free parameters ) .
the normalizations of the zeus , h1 and nmc data were kept fixed to unity whereas those of the remaining data sets were allowed to float within the quoted normalization errors ( 7 parameters ) .
the uncertainties in the parton densities , structure functions and related cross sections were estimated taking into account all correlations . included in the error calculation
are the experimental statistical errors , 57 independent sources of systematic uncertainty ( propagated using the technique described in @xcite ) and the errors on the input parameters of the fit .
the fit yielded a good description of the data with a @xmath26 of 1540 for 1578 data points and 28 free parameters .
the quality of the fit is illustrated in fig .
[ fig : f2pvsq ] where we show the fixed target @xmath7 data for @xmath11 .
the higher twist coefficient @xmath25 in eq .
( [ eq : htwist ] ) is found to be negative for @xmath27 and becomes large and positive at high @xmath0 .
our result on the higher twist contribution is very close to that obtained by mrst @xcite .
nuclear effects in neutrino scattering were investigated by calculating the ratios @xmath28 and @xmath29 of the ccfr data to the qcd predictions of scattering on a free nucleon .
both these ratios do not significantly depend on @xmath1 in accordance with measurements of nuclear effects in muon scattering @xcite .
the ratios , averaged over @xmath1 , are plotted in fig .
[ fig : nuceff ] and show the typical @xmath0 dependence of nuclear effects , including the rise at large @xmath0 due to fermi motion .
however , within the present accuracy it is not possible to establish whether these nuclear effects are significantly different from those measured in charged lepton scattering ( full curves in fig .
[ fig : nuceff ] ) . are shown the parton densities obtained from the qcd fit ( full curves ) .
we have verified that the strange quark density is compatible with the measurements from ccfr @xcite and also that the qcd prediction of @xmath30 agrees well with the zeus data @xcite above @xmath31 gev@xmath6 .
this supports the assumption made in this analysis that , at least for @xmath32 , quark mass effects do not spoil the qcd extrapolations to large @xmath1 .
also shown in fig .
[ fig : allpdf ] are the parton densities from cteq4 and cteq5 @xcite .
there is , within errors , good agreement between these results and the qcd fit , although both the present analysis and cteq5 yield a slightly harder @xmath33 density than cteq4 .
bodek and yang @xcite also obtain a harder @xmath34 density by modifying cteq4 ( where the ratio @xmath35 as @xmath36 ) such that @xmath37 they find @xmath38 which implies that @xmath39 as @xmath36 .
the @xmath40 ratio is shown in fig .
[ fig : dou ] .
it is seen that the result from the qcd fit with @xmath41 ( full curve ) is for @xmath42 close to the modified cteq4 distribution with @xmath43 ( dotted curve ) ; if we leave @xmath44 a free parameter in the fit , we obtain @xmath45 ( statistical error ) , close to zero . in any case
, the large error band clearly indicates that the exact behavior of @xmath40 at large @xmath0 is not well constrained .
it might go to zero ( cteq ) , to a constant ( bodek and yang ) or may even diverge ( this analysis ) as @xmath46 .
the cc @xmath47 cross section is predominantly sensitive to the @xmath48 quark density @xmath49 where @xmath50 with @xmath51 the @xmath3 center of mass energy ( @xmath5210@xmath53 gev@xmath6 at hera ) . in fig .
[ fig : ratios ] we show the zeus measurements @xcite of the cc @xmath4 single differential cross sections @xmath54 and @xmath55 for @xmath56 gev@xmath6 , normalized to the nlo predictions calculated with the cteq4 parton distribution set .
the full ( dotted ) curves correspond to the predictions from the qcd fit ( cteq5 ) which both achieve a better description of the data at large @xmath1 and @xmath0 due to an improved determination of the @xmath48 quark density .
sm predictions of the @xmath4 nc cross sections , calculated with the parton densities obtained in this analysis , also agree very well with the recent zeus data @xcite ( not shown ) .
99 zeus collab . , desy 99 - 056 .
zeus collab .
, desy 99 - 059 .
cteq collab .
lai et al .
d55 ( 1997 ) 1280 .
yang and a. bodek , phys .
82 ( 1999 ) 2467
. m. botje , nikhef 99 - 011 , desy 99 - 038 ( in preparation ) .
zeus collab .
, m. derrick et al .
, z. phys .
c72 ( 1996 ) 399 .
, s. aid et al .
b470 ( 1996 ) 3 .
e665 collab .
adams et al . , phys .
d54 ( 1996 ) 3006 .
nmc , m. arneodo et al .
b483 ( 1997 ) 3 .
bcdms collab .
benvenuti et al . , phys .
lett . b223 ( 1989 ) 485 and phys .
b237 ( 1990 ) 592 .
slac , l.w .
whitlow et al . , phys .
b282 ( 1992 ) 475 .
nmc , m. arneodo et al . ,
b487 ( 1997 ) 3 .
ccfr collab .
, w. seligman et al .
79 ( 1997 ) 1213 .
e866 collab .
hawker et al .
80 ( 1998 ) 3715 .
j. gomez et al . , phys .
d49 ( 1994 ) 4348 .
eskola , v.j .
kolhinen and c.a .
salgado , jyfl-8/98 , us - ft/14 - 98 , hep - ph/9807297 ; k.j .
eskola , v.j .
kolhinen and p.v .
ruuskanen , nucl .
535 ( 1998 ) 351 .
g. gurci , w. furmanski and r. petronzio , nucl .
b175 ( 1980 ) 27 ; w. furmanski and r. petronzio , phys .
lett . 97b ( 1980 ) 437 and z. phys .
c11 ( 1982 ) 293 .
a.d martin , w.j .
stirling and r.g .
roberts , phys .
d50 ( 1994 ) 6734 .
ccfr collab .
bazarko et al . , z. phys .
c65 ( 1995 ) 189 .
c. pascaud and f. zomer , lal 95 - 05 .
martin et al .
lett . b443
( 1998 ) 301 .
nmc , a. amaudruz et al .
b441 ( 1995 ) 3 ; m. arneodo et al .
b441 ( 1995 ) 12 .
i. redondo , in these proceedings .
cteq collab .
lai et al .
, hep - ph/9903282 . | integrated luminosity 50 pb@xmath2 collected at hera 19941997 new kinematic domain @xmath0 @xmath1 accessible for deep inelastic scattering @xmath3 collisions measurements zeus @xmath4 differential neutral charged current cross sections @xmath5@xmath6 available @xcite standard model predictions parton distribution set cteq4 @xcite nc cross sections below cc measurements @xmath0 @xmath1 new physics imperfect knowledge parton densities modification cteq4 quark density yields sm predictions cc @xmath4 data performed global nlo qcd analysis @xcite structure function data parton densities proton full error analysis provides estimates uncertainties parton densities structure functions sm predictions nc cc cross sections data @xmath7 zeus @xcite h1 @xcite @xmath7 @xmath8 @xcite @xmath9 from fixed target experiments neutrino data @xmath10 @xmath11 data difference @xmath12 @xcite data cover kinematic range @xmath13 @xmath14@xmath6 @xmath15@xmath8 @xmath10 corrected for nuclear effects @xcite deuterium uncertainty 100% iron 50% qcd predictions for structure functions obtained solving evolution equations nlo @xcite scale @xmath16@xmath6 gluon density sea valence quark densities difference @xmath12 parameterized @xcite 16 parameters strange quark density fraction of sea @xcite normalizations parton densities constrained momentum sum rule valence quark counting rules charm bottom quarks massless generated dynamically above thresholds @xmath20 @xmath21 strong coupling constant set to @xmath22 higher twist contributions to @xmath7 @xmath8 describing structure functions @xmath23 @xmath24 obeys nlo qcd evolution equations @xmath25 parameterized fourth degree polynomial @xmath0 5 free parameters normalizations zeus h1 nmc data fixed to unity remaining data sets float within normalization errors 7 parameters uncertainties in parton densities structure functions cross sections estimated correlationserror calculation experimental statistical errors 57 sources systematic uncertainty errors on input parameters fit fit yielded good description data @xmath26 of 1540 for 1578 data points 28 free parameters quality fit illustrated in fig . fixed target @xmath7 data for @xmath11 higher twist coefficient @xmath25 negative for @xmath27 positive at high @xmath0 result higher twist contribution close to mrst @xcite nuclear effects in neutrino scattering investigated ratios @xmath28 @xmath29 of ccfr data to qcd predictions scattering ratios significantly depend on @xmath1 muon scattering ratios averaged over @xmath1 plotted in fig . show typical @xmath0 dependence of nuclear effects rise at large @xmath0 due to fermi motion not possible to establish nuclear effects different from charged lepton scattering parton densities from qcd fit verified strange quark density compatible with measurements ccfr @xcite qcd prediction of @xmath30 agrees with zeus data @xcite above @xmath31supports assumption @xmath32 quark mass effects spoil qcd extrapolations @xmath1 shown fig . parton densities from cteq4 cteq5 @xcite good agreement between results qcd fit present analysis cteq5 yield harder @xmath33 density cteq4 bodek yang @xcite obtain harder @xmath34 density modifying cteq4 ratio @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 implies @xmath39 @xmath36 @xmath40 ratio shown in fig . result qcd fit with @xmath41 @xmath42 close to modified cteq4 distribution @xmath43 leave @xmath44 free parameter obtain @xmath45 close to zero large error band indicates behavior @xmath40 large @xmath0 not constrained might go to zero diverge @xmath46 @xmath47 cross section sensitive to @xmath48 quark density @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath3 center of mass energy @xmath5210@xmath53@xmath6 fig .fig ratios zeus measurements @xmath4 differential cross sections normalized nlo predictions cteq4 parton distribution set full curves correspond predictions qcd fit cteq5 better description data @xmath1 improved determination @xmath48 quark density predictions @xmath4 cross sections calculated parton densities agree recent zeus data zeus collab desy 99 - 056 99 - 059 lai et al . d55 ( 1997 ) 1280 yang bodek phys . 82 ( 1999 ) 2467 99 - 011 desy 99 - 038 zeus collab derrick et al . c72 ( 1996 ) 399 aid b470 ( 1996 ) 3 e665 collab adams et al phys. d54 ( 1996 ) 3006 arneodo al b483 ( 1997 ) 3 bcdms collab benvenuti phys. b223 ( 1989 ) 485 b237 ( 1990 ) 592 whitlow phys b282 ( 1992 ) 475 arneodo b487 ( 1997 ) 3 ccfr collabseligman 79 1997 ) 1213 e866 hawker 80 1998 ) 3715 gomez phys d49 1994 ) 4348 eskola kolhinen salgado jyfl-8/98 us - ft/14 - 98 hep - ph/9807297 eskola kolhinen ruuskanen nucl 535 ( 1998 ) 351 gurci furmanski petronzio b175 1980 ) 27 furmanski petronzio phys 97b ( 1980 ) 437 c11 ( 1982 ) 293 martin stirling roberts phys d50 1994 ) 6734 bazarko c65 ( 1995 ) 189 pascaud zomer 95 - 05 b443 ( 1998 ) 301 amaudruz b441 1995 ) 3 arneodo b441 1995 ) 12 redondo proceedings lai hep - ph/9903282 | 0.350814 | 2,535 | 1,327 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,136 | recent theoretical developments in the four - boson system with resonant interactions are described .
momentum - space scattering equations for the four - particle transition operators are used .
the properties of unstable tetramers with approximate dimer - atom - atom structure are determined .
in addition , the three- and four - cluster recombination processes in the four - boson system are studied . | few - particle systems with resonant interactions ( characterized by a large two - particle scattering length @xmath0 greatly exceeding the interaction range ) exhibit universal behaviour .
their properties are independent of the short - range interaction details .
the theoretical study of such systems was initiated by v. efimov in 1970 who predicted the existence of weakly bound three - particle states ( efimov trimers ) with asymptotic discrete scaling symmetry @xcite .
the interest in the universal few - particle systems raised after the efimov s prediction got confirmed in the cold - atom physics experiments @xcite . in the present work we summarize some recent theoretical developments for the universal system of four identical bosons .
the existence of two tetramers below each efimov trimer was predicted in refs .
@xcite while their energies and widths were determined very precisely in refs .
the resulting four - boson energy ( @xmath1 ) spectrum as function of @xmath2 is schematically shown in fig .
[ fig : efi ] ( see refs .
@xcite for quantitative relations between @xmath0 and @xmath1 that , for a better visualisation , are not preserved here ) .
the above - mentioned tetramers are labeled as @xmath3 where @xmath4 refers to the associated efimov trimer and @xmath5 . in the present work we focus on a different type of tetramers , namely , the ones having an approximate dimer - atom - atom structure and labeled as @xmath6 .
their existence was predicted in ref .
@xcite as a consequence of the three - body efimov effect in the three - body system made off a dimer and two atoms . in a special regime near the efimov trimer intersection with the atom - dimer threshold
the atom - dimer scattering length becomes arbitrarily large and greatly exceeds the dimer size . under these circumstances
one may expect to mimic some properties of the few - boson systems using a model that considers the dimer as a pointlike particle .
then in the effective three - body system consisting of a dimer and two atoms there are two atom - dimer pairs with infinite two - body scattering length .
in such a three - body model of the four - boson system the three - body efimov effect occurs , however , with a very large discrete scaling factor @xcite .
the dimer - atom - atom structure of the resulting efimov - like states is only an approximation , and we present the first successful attempt @xcite to describe them rigorously as four - boson states . since they lie in the continuum , we use scattering equations for the four - particle transition operators . for a given efimov trimer
the universal properties of the lowest associated tetramer @xmath7 are determined and its impact on the collisions in the four - boson system is discussed .
furthermore , using the same technical framework we study the recombination processes in the four - boson system , i.e. , the four - boson recombination into atom plus trimer @xcite and dimer - atom - atom recombination into atom plus trimer or dimer plus dimer @xcite .
we employ alt , grassberger , and sandhas ( ags ) equations @xcite for the transition operators that provide an exact description of the four - particle scattering process . in the case of four identical particles
there are only two distinct two - cluster partitions , one of @xmath8 type and one of @xmath9 type .
we choose those partitions to be ( 12,3)4 and ( 12)(34 ) and denote them in the following by @xmath10 and @xmath11 , respectively .
the corresponding transition operators @xmath12 for the system of four identical bosons obey symmetrized ags equations [ eq : u ] @xmath13 here @xmath14 is the free green s function of the four - particle system with energy @xmath1 and kinetic energy operator @xmath15 , the two - particle transition matrix @xmath16 acting within the pair ( 12 ) is derived from the corresponding potential @xmath17 , and the symmetrized operators for the 3 + 1 and 2 + 2 subsystems are obtained from the integral equations @xmath18 the employed basis states have to be symmetric under exchange of two particles in subsystem ( 12 ) for the @xmath8 partition and in ( 12 ) and ( 34 ) for the @xmath9 partition .
the correct symmetry of the four - boson system is ensured by the operators @xmath19 , @xmath20 , and @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the permutation operator of particles @xmath0 and @xmath23 .
all observables for two - cluster reactions are determined by the transition amplitudes @xmath24 obtained @xcite as on - shell matrix elements of the ags operators ; the weight factors @xmath25 with values @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , and @xmath29 arise due to the symmetrization @xcite .
the matrix elements are calculated between the faddeev components @xmath30 of the corresponding initial / final atom - trimer or dimer - dimer states @xmath31 .
the amplitude for the three - cluster breakup of the initial two - cluster state is given @xcite by @xmath32 @xmath33 and @xmath34 and the dimer - atom - atom three - cluster channel state @xmath35 .
due to the time - reversal symmetry the three - cluster recombination into a two - cluster state is described by the same amplitude , i.e. , @xmath36 .
the amplitude for the four - cluster breakup can be obtained @xcite as @xmath37 t \ , g_0 u_1 g_0 \ , t \ , g_0 \ , { \mathcal{u}}_{1\alpha } \\ { } & + ( 1+p_2 ) t \ , g_0 u_2 g_0 \ ,
, g_0 \ , { \mathcal{u}}_{2\alpha } \ } \end{split}\ ] ] with @xmath38 and @xmath39 and the nonsymmetrized four - boson free - channel state @xmath40 .
again , due to the time - reversal symmetry the amplitude for the four - boson recombination into a two - cluster state is given by @xmath41 .
we solve the ags equations in the momentum - space partial - wave framework ; the technical details can be found in refs . @xcite .
to obtain universal results we consider reactions involving highly excited efimov trimers where the finite - range effects become negligible ; typically , @xmath42 .
the @xmath7 tetramer emerges at the @xmath4th atom - trimer threshold at the two - boson scattering length @xmath43 with @xmath44 corresponding to the intersection of atom - trimer and atom - atom - dimer thresholds . as shown in ref .
@xcite , this tetramer stays very close to the @xmath4th atom - trimer threshold and decays through the atom - atom - dimer threshold at @xmath45 .
the higher tetramers @xmath46 exist only extremely close to @xmath47 and can not be resolved in our four - boson calculations ; estimations based on the three - body model are given in ref .
@xcite .
the intersections of the tetramers with the @xmath4th atom - trimer threshold manifest themselves most prominently in the collisions of atoms and trimers at vanishing relative kinetic energy leading to the resonant behaviour of the corresponding atom - trimer ( @xmath4th ) scattering length @xmath48 .
it is shown in fig .
[ fig : a ] as a function of the two - boson scattering length @xmath0 .
here we use @xmath49 to build universal dimensionless ratios ; this special value of @xmath0 corresponds to the intersection of the @xmath4th atom - trimer and dimer - dimer thresholds .
the @xmath48 resonance at @xmath50 is due to the @xmath7 tetramer .
the increase of @xmath51 shown in fig .
[ fig : a ] near @xmath52 is not related to the tetramers ; it is due to the scaling of the elastic cross section with the spatial size of the trimer that grows with decreasing binding relative to the atom - dimer threshold .
the @xmath48 resonances at @xmath53 and @xmath54 correspond to the disappearance and reappearance of the @xmath55 tetramer as shown in fig .
[ fig : efi ] .
the explanation for such a spectacular behaviour of the @xmath55 tetramer may be the following : increasing @xmath2 , i.e. , increasing the strength of the two - boson interaction , the binding energies increase for all few - boson states but at different rates .
the increase is faster for the dimer , slower for the trimers , and even slower for the tetramers .
this is why the @xmath4th trimer decays through the atom - dimer threshold at @xmath47 , and the @xmath55 tetramer , having a structure of an atom weakly attached to the trimer , decays through the atom - trimer threshold at @xmath56 , becoming an inelastic virtual state ( ivs ) .
however , when the the @xmath4th atom - trimer and dimer - dimer thresholds are close to each other , the interference of the atom - trimer and dimer - dimer configurations in the @xmath55 tetramer yield additional binding such that the tetramer becomes an unstable bound state until it finally decays through the dimer - dimer threshold @xcite .
the number of the four - atom recombination events in a non - degenerated atomic gas per volume and time is @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the density of atoms and @xmath59 is the four - atom recombination rate .
its relation to the breakup / recombination amplitude is given in ref .
the zero - temperature limit of the four - atom recombination rate @xmath60 is shown in fig .
[ fig : k4 ] as a function of the two - boson scattering length .
the special value of @xmath61 corresponds to the @xmath4th efimov trimer being at the three free atom threshold .
the two peaks of @xmath60 at @xmath62 and @xmath63 correspond to the @xmath64 and @xmath55 tetramers being at the four free atom threshold , respectively .
this is qualitatively consistent with the results of ref .
@xcite .
the results for the dimer - atom - atom recombination reactions leading to the atom - trimer or dimer - dimer final states are presented in ref . @xcite .
we studied the dimer - atom - atom three - body efimov effect using rigorous four - particle scattering equations for the transition operators that were solved in the momentum - space framework .
we determined the properties of the deepest resulting tetramers and demonstrated that in ultracold atom - trimer collisions they lead to resonant enhancement of elastic and inelastic reactions .
furthermore , we considered three- and four - cluster recombination reactions in the universal four - boson system and presented results for the ultracold four - boson recombination . | few - particle systems with resonant interactions large two - particle scattering length interaction range exhibit universal behaviour properties independent of short - range interaction details theoretical study initiated by v. efimov 1970 predicted weakly bound three - particle states trimers with asymptotic discrete scaling symmetry interest in universal particle systems confirmed in cold - atom physics experiments present work summarize recent theoretical developments for universal system of four identical bosons two tetramers below each efimov trimer predicted in energies widths determined precisely four - boson energy spectrum function of @xmath2 shown in fig . relations between tetramers labeled as @xmath3 @xmath4 refers to efimov trimer and @xmath5 focus on different tetramers approximate dimer - atom - atom structure labeled @xmath6 existence predicted in three - body efimov effect special regime near efimov trimer intersection with atom - dimer threshold scattering length large exceeds dimer sizemimic properties few - boson systems model dimer pointlike particle three - body system dimer two atoms two atom - dimer pairs infinite two - body scattering length body model four - boson system three - body efimov effect occurs large scaling factor @xcite dimer - atom - atom structure efimov - like states approximation first attempt describe four - boson states continuum use scattering equations four - particle transition operators efimov trimer universal properties lowest associated tetramer @xmath7 determined impact collisions four - boson system discussed study recombination processes four - boson system atom plus trimer dimer - atom - atom recombination atom plus trimer employ alt grassberger sandhas ) equations transition operators four - particle scattering process four identical particles two distinct two - cluster partitions @xmath8 one @xmath9 type choose partitions ( 12,3)4 ( 12)(34 ) denote @xmath10 @xmath11transition operators @xmath12 four bosons obey symmetrized ags equations free green function four - particle system energy kinetic energy operator two - particle transition matrix @xmath16 pair ( 12 ) derived potential @xmath17 symmetrized operators 3 + 1 2 + 2 subsystems integral equations @xmath18 basis states symmetric exchange two particles subsystem ( 12 ) @xmath8 partition ( 12 ) 34 ) @xmath9 partition symmetry four - boson system ensured operators @xmath19 @xmath21 @xmath22 permutation operator particles observables two - cluster reactions determined transition amplitudes @xmath24 on - shell matrix elements operators weight factors @xmath26 symmetrization matrix elements calculated between faddeev components initial final atom - states amplitude three - cluster breakup two - cluster state @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 atom three - cluster channel state @xmath35 - reversal symmetry three - cluster recombination into two - cluster state same amplitude @xmath36amplitude four - cluster breakup obtained @xmath37 g_0 u_1{1\alpha 1+p_2_0_2\alpha with @xmath38 @xmath39 nonsymmetrized four - boson free - channel state @xmath40 time - reversal symmetry amplitude four - boson recombination into two - cluster state given by @xmath41 solve ags equations momentum - space partial - wave framework technical details in refs @xcite universal results consider reactions highly excited efimov trimers finite - range effects negligible @xmath42 @xmath7 tetramer emerges @xmath4th atom - trimer threshold two - boson scattering length @xmath43 @xmath44 intersection atom - trimer thresholds tetramer stays close decays at @xmath45 higher tetramers @xmath46 exist close to @xmath47 not resolved in four - boson calculations estimations three - body model in ref . @xciteintersections tetramers with @xmath4th atom - trimer threshold manifest in collisions atoms at vanishing kinetic energy to resonant behaviour atom - trimer scattering length @xmath48 shown in fig . as function of two - boson scattering length @xmath0 use @xmath49 to build dimensionless ratios special value @xmath0 corresponds to intersection @xmath4th - trimer and dimer - thresholds @xmath48 resonance at @xmath50 due to @xmath7 tetramer increase of @xmath51 near @xmath52 not related to tetramers due to scaling elastic cross section with spatial size trimer with decreasing binding @xmath48 resonances at @xmath53 and @xmath54 correspond to disappearance reappearance of @xmath55 tetramer in increasing @xmath2 strength two - boson interaction binding energies increase for states at different rates faster for dimer slower trimers tetramers @xmath4th trimer decays at @xmath47 @xmath55 tetramer decays through at @xmath56 becoming inelastic virtual state@xmath4th - trimer dimer - dimer thresholds close @xmath55 tetramer binding tetramer unstable decays dimer - threshold four - atom recombination events non - degenerated atomic gas per volume time @xmath57 density four - atom recombination rate relation breakup recombination amplitude zero - temperature limit four - atom recombination rate @xmath60 fig . function two - boson scattering length special value @xmath61 @xmath4th efimov trimer three free atom threshold peaks @xmath60 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath55 tetramers four free atom threshold consistent with results ref . results dimer - atom - atom recombination reactions - trimer dimer - dimer final states studied dimer - atom - atom three - body efimov effect four - particle scattering equations determined properties deepest resulting tetramers ultracold atom - trimer collisions lead enhancement elastic inelastic reactions considered three- four - cluster recombination reactions four - boson system results ultracold four - boson recombination | 0.354008 | 2,474 | 1,258 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,156 | we report a study of the spectra and structure of the accretion disc of the v2051 oph while the star was in an unusual , faint brightness state during 1996 . | v2051 oph ( @xmath0 ) belongs to a small group of ultrashort period eclipsing dwarf nova together with z cha , oy car and ht cas . during 1996 ,
it was seen at a low brightness state ( @xmath1 ) , in which mass accretion was reduced to a minimum ( baptista et al .
1998 ) .
high - speed ultraviolet and optical spectroscopy was secured with the faint object spectrograph onboard the hubble space telescope on 1996 jan 29 ( uv : g400h grating , @xmath2 , @xmath3 pixel@xmath4 ; optical : g160l grating , @xmath5 , @xmath6 pixel@xmath4 ) at a time resolution of 3.4s .
the runs cover the eclipse cycles 109988 ( uv ) and 109989 ( optical ) , according to the ephemeris of baptista et al .
( 2003 ) .
the out - of - eclipse uv spectra show prominent ly@xmath7 @xmath8 , cii @xmath9 , siiv @xmath10 and civ @xmath11 emission lines as well as broad absorption bands possibly due to feii .
the optical spectra show the balmer continuum in emission as well as he emission lines and strong balmer emission lines .
the uv spectra were divided into 34 narrow passbands ( 19 - 60 wide in the continuum and velocity - resolved bins of 2000 km / s or 3000 km / s for the lines ) while the optical spectra were divided into 68 passbands ( 15 - 42 wide in the continuum and velocity - resolved bins of 1000 km / s for the lines ) and light curves were extracted for each one
. maximum - entropy eclipse mapping techniques ( baptista & steiner 1993 ) were used to solve for a map of the disc brightness distribution and for the flux of an additional uneclipsed component in each band .
the line centre maps show broad brightness distributions from an extended and optically thick region , possibly ionized by the boundary layer .
velocity - resolved h@xmath12 line light curves show the expected behavior for the eclipse of gas rotating in prograde sense ( rotational disturbance ) , with the blue wing ( @xmath13 ) being eclipsed earlier than the red wing ( @xmath14 ) .
net line emission maps show that the balmer lines are in absorption at the disc centre , and that there is also little contribution from the bright spot at the disc rim .
in contrast with the observed in the line maps , the continuum maps show pronounced emission from the compact white dwarf and bright spot sources as well as enhanced emission along the ballistic stream trajectory of gas stream , an evidence of gas stream overflow .
we sliced the disc into concentric annullar regions of width @xmath15 to compute disc spectra as a function of distance .
motivated by the asymmetric emission patterns observed in the eclipse maps , we extracted spatially resolved spectra for three distinct disc regions : `` front '' ( the disc side closest to the secondary star ) , `` back '' ( the side disc farther away from the secondary star ) and `` gas stream '' ( a thin slice around the stream trajectory in each annullar region ) .
the disc ( front and back ) spectra show that the balmer decrement becomes shallower and the lines are more prominent and narrower with increasing radii .
the `` front '' side is systematically brighter than the `` back '' side in agreement with the results of vrielmann et al .
the difference becomes more pronounced as the radius increases .
the comparison of the `` front '' and `` back '' spectra show that the latter contain broad absorption bands , possibly due to feii , that become more conspicuous in the outer parts of the disc suggesting that they arises from absorption along the line of sight in a vertically extended region above the disc ( e.g. horne et al . 1994 ) .
the spectrum of the central pixel shows a continuum filled with broad and shallow absorption lines and a balmer jump in absorption , and resembles that of a da white dwarf .
we computed the ratio between the spectrum of the `` gas stream '' and that of the `` front '' side at the same radius to investigate the emission along the gas stream trajectory .
the spectrum of the gas stream is clearly distinct from the disc spectrum for a large range of radii .
in contrast to the observed in the disc spectra , the lines appear in absorption .
the distinct emission along the gas stream trajectory underscores the evidence of gas stream overflow .
the fact that the lines appear in absorption in the stream spectra suggest the presence of matter outside of the orbital plane ( e.g. a chomosphere + wind ) .
the uneclipsed component is dominated by the balmer continuum and strong balmer emission lines in the optical and by resonant emission lines in the uv , suggesting that it arises in a vertically extended region .
the strong lines in the optical and uv spectra as well as the balmer continuum accounts for @xmath16 per cent of the total light at the respective wavelength .
the continuum in the uneclipsed spectrum yield negligible fractional contributions to the total light at the corresponding wavelengths . | v2051 oph @xmath0 ) ultrashort period eclipsing dwarf nova z cha oy car ht cas 1996 seen low brightness state @xmath1 ) mass accretion reduced minimum baptista et 1998 high - speed ultraviolet optical spectroscopy faint object spectrograph hubble space telescope 1996 jan 29 uv : g400h @xmath2 optical g160l time resolution 3.4s runs cover eclipse cycles 109988 uv 109989 optical baptista et al . 2003 out - of - eclipse uv spectra show ly@xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 emission lines broad absorption bands optical spectra show balmer continuum emission lines strong balmer emission lines uv spectra divided 34 passbands 19 - 60 wide velocity - 2000 3000 optical spectra 68 passbands 15 - 42 wide light curves extracted maximum - entropy eclipse mapping techniques baptista steiner 1993 disc brightness distribution flux additional uneclipsed component line centre maps show brightness distributions extended optically thick region ionized by boundary layervelocity - resolved h@xmath12 line light curves show behavior eclipse of gas blue wing @xmath13 ) eclipsed earlier than red wing @xmath14 net line emission maps show balmer lines absorption at disc centre little contribution from bright spot at disc rim continuum maps show emission from compact white dwarf bright spot sources enhanced emission along ballistic stream trajectory gas stream gas stream overflow sliced disc into concentric annullar regions @xmath15 to compute disc spectra distance motivated asymmetric emission patterns eclipse extracted spatially resolved spectra for three disc regions front back gas stream disc spectra show balmer decrement shallower lines prominent narrower with increasing radii front '' side brighter than back '' side results vrielmann et al difference pronounced as radius increases comparison front back spectra latter contain broad absorption bands possibly due to feii conspicuous in outer parts disc from absorption along line of sight vertically extended region above disc horne et al . 1994 )spectrum central pixel shows continuum broad shallow absorption lines balmer jump absorption resembles white dwarf computed ratio between spectrum gas stream front side same radius emission gas stream trajectory spectrum gas stream distinct from disc spectrum large range radii contrast disc spectra lines appear in absorption distinct emission underscores gas stream overflow lines absorption suggest presence matter outside orbital plane chomosphere + wind uneclipsed component dominated by balmer continuum strong balmer emission lines optical resonant emission lines uv vertically extended region strong lines optical uv spectra balmer continuum accounts for @xmath16 per cent total light respective wavelength continuum uneclipsed spectrum negligible fractional contributions total light wavelengths | 0.183605 | 1,104 | 545 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,176 | the momentum distribution function of a parabolically confined gas of bosons with harmonic interparticle interactions is derived . in the bose - einstein condensation region
, this momentum distribution substantially deviates from a maxwell - boltzmann distribution .
it is argued that the determination of the temperature of the boson gas from the bose - einstein momentum distribution function is more appropriate than the currently used fitting to the high momentum tail of the maxwell - boltzmann distribution . | the extreme low temperature required for the observation of bose - einstein condensation alkali vapors is a major achievement of present day experimentation @xcite .
unfortunately , the temperature itself is not directly observable .
it has to be estimated from other , more accessible properties of the system , such as the velocity distribution of the vapor @xcite . because of the uncertainty relation between the inverse temperature and the energy of the system for a finite number of particles , it is not clear _ a priori _ how many particles
are required for a reasonable thermodynamically defined concept of temperature . in the present paper
, we do not address this fundamental question , but rather assume that the number of bosons in the system is sufficiently large to have a meaningful definition of the temperature . under this assumption ,
the experimental estimate of the temperature@xcite is based on the hypothesis that the momentum distribution function is maxwell - boltzmann like , at least for sufficiently high momentum .
this hypothesis deserves further investigation and quantitative comparison to the momentum distribution of a parabolically confined bose - einstein gas . to the best of our knowledge ,
the bose - einstein momentum distribution in a parabolic confinement potential has not been documented before . using the methods for path integration developed in @xcite
, we have been able to calculate the momentum distribution function of a gas of parabolically confined bosons with quadratic harmonic interparticle interactions .
this calculation is presented in sec .
other investigations using the same methodology @xcite indicated that for weakly interacting systems , such as @xmath0rb and @xmath1na , the interaction slightly influences the parameters involved in the model system , and therefore have only a moderate influence the momentum distribution . in section iii ,
the approximations are examined which lead to the maxwellian momentum distribution function , and a quantitative comparison is made between the temperature obtained in the bose - einstein distribution and the estimate of the temperature , obtained by fitting a maxwell - boltzmann distribution to the tail of the measured velocity distribution .
the conclusion from this analysis is that the estimate from the maxwellian deviates substantially from the temperature of the bose - einstein distribution in the presence of a bose - einstein condensate .
the anisotropic one - body potential energy @xmath2 and the two - body potential energy @xmath3 of the model system consisting of @xmath4 bosons are given by @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the position of the @xmath7th boson , @xmath8 is the mass of the bosons and @xmath9 , @xmath10 are the frequencies of the parabolic confinement in the @xmath11-plane and along the @xmath12-axis , respectively .
the model interparticle interaction is harmonic with frequency @xmath13 and can be either attractive ( ) or repulsive ( + ) .
the renormalized frequencies in the @xmath11-plane and along the @xmath12-axis will be denoted by @xmath14 and @xmath15 , respectively .
these frequencies are the eigenfrequencies of the internal degrees of freedom of the boson gas , whereas the confining frequencies @xmath9 , @xmath10 are the eigenfrequencies for the center - of - mass motion . the momentum distribution @xmath16 , giving the statistical mean number of bosons with a given momentum @xmath17 in the canonical ensemble , can be written as @xmath18 where the angular brackets indicate quantum averages for boson statistics .
these mean values can be calculated for a system at temperature @xmath19 using the path integral propagator in momentum space @xmath20 : @xmath21 the calculation of the momentum distribution , analogous to the calculation of the spatial density distribution @xmath22 in @xcite , can be summarized as follows .
first the propagator in momentum space is evaluated by a fourier transform of the corresponding propagator in position space obtained in @xcite .
this results in @xmath23 with @xmath24 where @xmath25 is the total momentum , and @xmath26 is the one - particle propagator in momentum space for a particle in an anisotropic harmonic potential .
next , the sum over permutations appearing in the expression ( [ meanval ] ) for the mean value @xmath27 is transformed into a cyclic sum ( with @xmath28 the number of cycles of length @xmath29 ) .
the cyclic summation can be performed for the generating function @xmath30 where @xmath31 is the partition sum .
the result of the cyclic summation is @xmath32 \right\ } } { 8\sinh \left ( \ell \beta \hbar w_z/2\right ) \sinh ^2\left ( \ell \beta \hbar w_{xy}/2\right ) } .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the expectation value @xmath27 for @xmath4 bosons can then be derived in closed form from the generating functional @xmath33 by collecting all the terms with the same power in @xmath34 : @xmath35 \right\ } } { 8\sinh \left ( \ell \beta \hbar w_z/2\right ) \sinh ^2\left ( \ell \beta \hbar w_{xy}/2\right ) } .
\label{expval}\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally , the momentum distribution ( [ veld ] ) is found as a fourier transform of the expectation value ( [ expval ] ) .
the result is : @xmath36 with @xmath37 .\ ] ] in figure 1 this momentum distribution is shown at different temperatures for an isotropically confined bose gas with @xmath38 and consisting of 1000 bosons .
the momentum distribution for @xmath39 is qualitatively similar to the distribution with @xmath40 shown in figure 1 . in the inset
, the value of the momentum distribution in the origin is shown as a function of the temperature .
as the temperature is lowered below the condensation temperature , the momentum distribution becomes more pronounced in the origin : the average number of bosons with momentum zero rises sharply .
the momentum distribution ( [ exact ] ) calculated in the previous section for a gas of parabolically confined bosons can be related to the maxwell distribution through a series of approximations .
first , in the case of a non - interacting ( @xmath41 ) , parabolically confined boson gas the momentum distribution ( [ exact ] ) becomes @xmath42 furthermore , according to feynman @xcite , the maxwell - boltzman statistics can be recovered by considering only the cycles of length @xmath43 in the cyclic summations of ( [ exact ] ) .
this means that permutations involving cycles of length larger than 1 play no role any more .
hence the momentum distribution function for distinguishable non - interacting particles in a parabolic potential is : @xmath44 if moreover the parabolic confinement were neglected , which corresponds to @xmath45 in ( [ vclas ] ) , one finally would be left with the maxwell - boltzmann momentum distribution for free particles : @xmath46 in experiments on bose - einstein condensed atomic vapors ( e.g. @xcite ) , the temperature of a cloud of parabolically trapped bosons was estimated by fitting the _ maxwell - boltzmann distribution _ _ _ ( [ max ] ) to the tail of the experimentally measured momentum distribution @xmath47 .
this can be done by first choosing a sufficiently large threshold momentum @xmath48 such that atoms with a momentum larger than @xmath48 do not belong to the bose - einstein condensate , and then minimizing @xmath49 with respect to the temperature @xmath50 appearing in the maxwell - boltzmann distribution .
the temperature obtained by this minimization will be denoted as @xmath51 and the procedure will be referred to as the `` maxwell - boltzmann fit procedure '' .
since the maxwell - boltzmann momentum distribution is a rather crude approximation to the momentum distribution ( [ vid ] ) of a gas of non - interacting , parabolically trapped bosons , we rather propose to determine the temperature by fitting @xmath52 to the momentum distribution ( [ vid ] ) derived in the present paper .
this is done by minimizing @xmath53 with respect to the temperature @xmath54 appearing in the momentum distribution @xmath55 for non - interacting , parabolically trapped bosons .
we will denote this procedure as the `` bose - einstein fit procedure '' and the resulting temperature as @xmath56 . in order to compare the maxwell - boltzmann fit procedure with the bose - einstein fit procedure , we applied the former on a momentum distribution simulated with @xmath55 ( @xmath57 for weakly interacting bosons ) , at a given temperature @xmath56 .
that is , @xmath58 was minimized with respect to @xmath51 , keeping @xmath59 and @xmath48 fixed .
the result @xmath51 of the minimization is compared to @xmath56 in figure 2 , where the ratio @xmath60 is shown as a function of @xmath56 at a fixed threshold momentum @xmath61 . in the bose - einstein condensed phase the discrepancy between @xmath56 and @xmath51 increases
when the number of bosons increases , whereas for @xmath62{n/\zeta \left ( 3\right ) } , $ ] the discrepancy decreases when the number of bosons is augmented , as shown in the inset of figure 2 . for temperatures well above the condensation temperature @xmath63 , the ratio @xmath64 is small , and the maxwell - boltzmann fit procedure gives a reliable temperature estimate in this high - temperature regime .
the difference between @xmath56 and @xmath51 becomes appreciable below the condensation temperature @xmath63 .
the present analysis therefore shows that @xmath60 is not negligible in the bose - einstein condensed phase and that the bose - einstein fit procedure is more appropriate than the maxwell - boltzmann fit procedure for the determination of the temperature .
in this paper , we calculated the momentum distribution function ( [ exact ] ) for a bose gas in an anisotropic parabolic trapping potential , including quadratic interparticle interactions . in the absence of interparticle interactions
, this momentum distribution simplifies to the momentum distribution function ( [ vid ] ) of an ideal boson gas in a harmonic confining potential .
the maxwell - boltzmann distribution ( [ max ] ) follows from ( [ vid ] ) by the further simplifications of neglecting the boson statistics and the parabolic confinement .
the underlying assumption in these derivations is that the number of bosons is sufficiently large to maintain the temperature concept from the thermodynamical limit .
assuming furthermore thermodynamical equilibrium , two temperature estimates were compared . since the temperature estimates used in experiments on bose - einstein condensed atomic vapors ( e.g. @xcite ) , are obtained by fitting the maxwell - boltzmann distribution _ _ ( [ max ] ) to the tail of the experimentally measured momentum distribution @xmath65 we derived the corresponding temperature @xmath51 by fitting the large - momentum tail of the maxwell - boltzmann distribution to the large - momentum tail of the momentum distribution of the bose gas ( [ vid ] ) .
this temperature estimate was compared to the temperature @xmath56 in the momentum distribution of the boson gas .
we find that @xmath51 substantially deviates from the correct temperature @xmath56 in the bose - einstein condensed phase , and hence that the bose - einstein fit procedure is more appropriate than the maxwell - boltzmann fit procedure for the determination of the temperature .
part of this work is performed in the framework of the fwo projects no .
1.5.729.94 , 1.5.545.98 , g.0287.95 , g.0071.98 , and wo.073.94n ( wetenschappelijke onderzoeksgemeenschap over `` laagdimensionele systemen '' , scientific research community of the fwo on `` low dimensional systems '' ) , the `` interuniversitaire attractiepolen belgische staat , diensten van de eerste minister
wetenschappelijke , technische en culturele aangelegenheden '' , and in the framework of the bof noi 1997 projects of the universiteit antwerpen .
two of the autors ( j.t . and f.b .
) acknowledge the fwo for financial support .
* fig.1 : * in figure 1 the average number @xmath66 of particles with a momentum @xmath67 is shown at several temperatures for a bose gas in an isotropic parabolic confinement , as function of the momentum .
units are chosen such that @xmath68 . in this set of units ,
the momentum is expressed in @xmath69 . in the inset ,
the momentum distribution at @xmath70 is shown as a function of temperature , with @xmath71{n/\zeta ( 3)}$ ] .
for this figure we have chosen @xmath38 : the momentum distribution for @xmath39 is qualitatively similar to the distribution for @xmath40 .
* fig.2 : * the relative difference between the temperature @xmath51 found by fitting a maxwell - boltzmann distribution and the actual temperature @xmath56 is shown in this figure , representing @xmath72 versus @xmath56 in units @xmath73{n/\zeta
this is shown for 500 , 1000 and 2000 non - interacting bosons . in the inset
, the dependence of @xmath72 on the number of particles is shown . | extreme low temperature for bose - einstein condensation alkali vapors major achievement experimentation @xcite temperature not directly observable estimated from properties velocity distribution vapor uncertainty between inverse temperature energy for finite number particles not clear how many particles required for reasonable thermodynamically concept temperature present paper number of bosons system large meaningful definition temperature experimental estimate of temperature@xcite based on momentum distribution function is maxwell - boltzmann like for high momentum hypothesis deserves further investigation quantitative comparison to momentum distribution parabolically confined bose - einstein gas bose - einstein momentum distribution in parabolic confinement potential not documented before using methods path integration @xcite momentum distribution of gas of parabolically confined bosons with quadratic harmonic interparticle interactions calculation presented in sec other investigations @xcite for weakly interacting systems interaction slightly influences parameters moderate momentum distribution in section iii approximations examined to maxwellian momentum distribution function quantitative comparison between temperature in bose - einstein distribution and estimate temperature by fitting maxwell - boltzmann distribution to measured velocity distributionconclusion analysis estimate maxwellian deviates from temperature bose - einstein distribution condensate anisotropic one - body potential energy @xmath2 two - body potential energy @xmath3 of model system bosons given by @xmath5 position boson mass frequencies parabolic confinement @xmath11-plane-axis model interparticle interaction harmonic with frequency @xmath13 attractive or repulsive renormalized frequencies-plane-axis denoted by @xmath14 and @xmath15 eigenfrequencies internal degrees freedom boson gas confining frequencies eigenfrequencies center - of - mass motion momentum distribution @xmath16 statistical mean number of bosons with momentum written as @xmath18 angular brackets indicate quantum averages for boson statistics mean values calculated for system at temperature @xmath19 using path integral propagator in momentum space @xmath20 : @xmath21 calculation momentum distribution analogous to spatial density distribution @xmath22 propagator momentum space evaluated by fourier transform of propagator position space @xciteresults in @xmath23 with @xmath24 @xmath25 total momentum @xmath26 one - particle propagator momentum space anisotropic harmonic potential sum over permutations expression meanval for mean value @xmath27 transformed into cyclic sum @xmath28 number of cycles of length @xmath29 ) cyclic summation performed for generating function @xmath30 @xmath31 partition sum result summation is @xmath32 expectation value @xmath27 for @xmath4 bosons derived from generating functional @xmath33 by collecting terms with same power in @xmath34 : @xmath35 momentum distribution ( [ veld ] ) found as fourier transform of expectation value ( [ expval ] ) result is @xmath36 with @xmath37 figure 1 momentum distribution shown at different temperatures for isotropically confined bose gas with @xmath38 1000 bosons momentum distribution for @xmath39 similar to distribution @xmath40 figure 1 value momentum distribution in origin function of temperaturetemperature lowered below condensation temperature momentum distribution pronounced average number bosons with momentum zero rises momentum distribution calculated for gas parabolically confined bosons related to maxwell distribution through approximations non - interacting parabolically confined boson gas momentum distribution becomes @xmath42 feynman maxwell - boltzman statistics recovered considering cycles of length @xmath43 in summations permutations cycles length larger than 1 play no role momentum distribution for non - interacting particles in parabolic potential is @xmath44 if parabolic confinement neglected @xmath45 maxwell - boltzmann momentum distribution for free particles : @xmath46 experiments on bose - condensed atomic vapors temperature of cloud of parabolically trapped bosons estimated by fitting maxwell - boltzmann distribution to measured momentum distribution @xmath47 choosing large threshold momentum @xmath48 atoms larger than to bose - einstein condensate minimizing @xmath49 temperature @xmath50 in maxwell - boltzmann distribution temperature obtained minimization denoted as @xmath51 maxwell - boltzmann fit proceduremaxwell - boltzmann momentum distribution non - interacting trapped bosons propose determine temperature fitting @xmath52 to momentum distribution present paper minimizing @xmath53 temperature @xmath54 momentum distribution @xmath55 for non - interacting bosons procedure bose - einstein fit procedure resulting temperature as @xmath56 applied on momentum distribution with @xmath55 ( @xmath57 for weakly interacting bosons at temperature @xmath56 @xmath58 minimized @xmath51 @xmath59 and @xmath48 fixed result @xmath51 minimization compared to @xmath56 in figure 2 ratio @xmath60 function of @xmath56 at fixed threshold momentum @xmath61 bose - einstein phase discrepancy between @xmath56 and @xmath51 increases when number bosons increases @xmath62 discrepancy decreases when number bosons temperatures above condensation temperature @xmath63 ratio @xmath64 small maxwell - boltzmann fit procedure reliable temperature estimate difference between @xmath56 and @xmath51 appreciable below condensation temperature @xmath63analysis shows @xmath60 not negligible in bose - einstein condensed phase bose - einstein fit procedure appropriate than maxwell - boltzmann fit for determination temperature calculated momentum distribution function for bose gas in anisotropic parabolic trapping potential including quadratic interparticle interactions absence interparticle interactions momentum distribution simplifies to ideal boson gas in harmonic confining potential maxwell - boltzmann distribution follows from neglecting boson statistics parabolic confinement assumption number of bosons large to maintain temperature concept from thermodynamical limit two temperature estimates compared estimates bose - einstein condensed vapors obtained by fitting maxwell - boltzmann distribution to momentum distribution derived temperature @xmath51 by fitting tail to bose gas temperature estimate compared to temperature @xmath56 boson gas @xmath51 substantially deviates from correct temperature @xmath56 in bose - einstein condensed phase bose - einstein fit procedure more appropriate than maxwell - boltzmann for determination temperature work performed in fwo projects no 1.5.729.94 , 1.5.545.98 g.0287.95 g.0071.98 wo.073.94n onderzoeksgemeenschap laagdimensionele systemen research community systems interuniversitaire attractiepolen belgische staat diensten eerste minister wetenschappelijke technische culturele aangelegenheden bof noi 1997 projects universiteit antwerpen two autors j.t . f.b . acknowledge fwo financial support.1 average number @xmath66 particles momentum @xmath67 temperatures bose gas isotropic parabolic confinement function momentum units chosen @xmath68 momentum expressed @xmath69 momentum distribution @xmath70 function temperature @xmath71{n/\zeta ( 3)}$ chosen @xmath38 momentum distribution @xmath39 similar @xmath40 fig.2 relative difference temperature @xmath51 maxwell - boltzmann distribution actual temperature @xmath56 @xmath72 versus @xmath56 units @xmath73{n/\zeta 500 1000 2000 non - interacting bosons dependence @xmath72 on number particles shown | 0.436791 | 2,957 | 1,526 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,181 | this paper presents an intuitive , geometrical derivation of the relativistic addition of velocities , and of the electromagnetic interaction between two uniformly moving charged particles , based on 2 spatial + 1 temporal dimensional minkowski diagrams .
we calculate the relativistic addition of velocities by projecting the world - line of the particle on the spatio - temporal planes of the reference frames considered .
we calculate the real component of the electromagnetic 4-force , in the proper reference frame of the source particle , starting from the coulomb force generated by a charged particle at rest .
we then obtain the imaginary component of the 4-force , in the same reference frame , from the requirement that the 4-force be orthogonal to the 4-velocity .
the 4-force is then projected on a real 3 dimensional space to get the lorentz force . | special relativity , as presented in today s textbooks , is a complex mathematical theory .
the 1 spatial + 1 temporal dimensional minkowski diagrams , which initially introduce the lorentz transformation , the time dilatation and the length contraction , are soon put aside in favor of an approach based on differential calculus and linear algebra .
one gets little intuitive understanding of the law of relativistic addition of velocities , and of the fact that `` magnetism is a kind of second - order effect arising from relativistic changes in the electric fields of moving charges '' @xcite .
however , by introducing only slightly more elaborate minkowski diagrams , and using geometrical derivations , one can get back the intuitive understanding , to the great delight of the physicist who still believes in the spirit of descartes philosophy .
the complex plane , like the real plane , is a two - dimensional ( 2d ) vector space .
the scalar products for the real plane ( 1 ) and for the complex plane ( 2 ) are defined as follows @xmath0 @xmath1 where @xmath2,@xmath3 and respectively @xmath2,@xmath4 are the basis vectors .
since both planes have a scalar product , one can talk about orthogonal vectors ( their scalar product is zero ) and about the magnitude of a vector ( the square root of the scalar product of a vector with itself ) .
this allows us to define the circle ( the geometric locus of the points equally spaced from a given point ) , the angle in radians ( the length , between two points of a circle of radius one , measured along the circumference ) , and the trigonometric functions sine and cosine ( the magnitudes of the projections of a radius one vector on the two coordinate axes ) . from these definitions it follows that , for both the real and the complex planes , one has the relations : @xmath5 @xmath6 ^ 2 + [ { d \over d\alpha } \cos(\alpha ) ] ^2 = 1.\ ] ] from ( 3)-(4 ) one can get the derivatives of the trigonometric functions , the taylor series expansions of sine and cosine , and then all the well known trigonometric relations .
the only detail we have to keep in mind is that the angle @xmath7 in the real plane is a real number , while in the complex plane it is a purely imaginary number , due to the non - positive definite scalar product used in the last case .
there are a few more relevant differences , which we can best point out if we represent the complex plane as an euclidean plane .
two vectors in the complex plane are orthogonal if they make the same angle with the bisecting line of the first quadrant .
the circle in the complex plane looks like a hyperbola @xcite .
not any line passing through the origin intersects the right ( or left ) branch of the hyperbola .
this means that there are pairs of lines passing through the origin to which we can not assign an angle .
however , for the triangles we will be working with , the ratio of segments behaves as if it were an angle , of negative value .
the true angle is obtained by symmetry with respect to the first bisecting line , as the pair @xmath7 and @xmath8 indicates in figure [ velocity ] .
consider a reference frame k which is moving with a velocity @xmath9 relative to another one k , and a particle moving with a velocity @xmath10 in the reference frame k. the reference frames are chosen such that their origins and the particle coincide at the space - time point o , as shown in figure [ velocity ] .
notice that @xmath11 and @xmath12 , because @xmath13 has a component only in the x direction .
the oz axis is not plotted , but is similar to the oy axis .
the question is : what is the velocity @xmath14 of the particle in the reference frame k ?
the world - line op of the particle is projected on the complex planes ( x , o , ict ) , ( y , o , ict ) , ( z , o , ict ) , ( x,o , ict ) , ( y,o , ict ) , ( z,o , ict ) , and the resulting angles from the respective projections give the components of the velocity of the particle in the two reference frames considered .
for the situation considered the planes ( x , o , ict ) and ( x,o , ict ) coincide .
it is seen from figure [ velocity ] that @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 in order to express @xmath20 and @xmath21 as functions of @xmath22 and @xmath23 we need to express @xmath24 and @xmath25 as functions of @xmath7,@xmath26 and @xmath27 . in the plane ( x , o , ict ) of the lorentz
boost the addition of velocities is based on the addition of angles @xcite @xmath28 @xmath29 from ( 11 ) , by substitution of the tangents ( 5)-(9 ) , it follows that @xmath30 two rectangles , apcd and bpce , result from the projection process .
it is evident that @xmath31 @xmath32 from ( 13)-(14 ) it follows that @xmath33}.\ ] ] by substitutions of the tangents ( 5)-(8 ) and of @xmath34^{-1/2}$ ] we get @xmath35 a similar expression is obtained for the @xmath36 component .
consider two charged particles ( with charges @xmath37 and @xmath38 ) at some arbitrary positions , moving with arbitrary , but uniform , velocities .
we orient our 3d reference frame in such a way that the first particle ( which generates the field ) is initially at the origin , moving along the ox axis with velocity @xmath9 , and the vector @xmath39 connecting the two particles is in the ( x , o , y ) plane .
the angle between @xmath40 and the ox axis is @xmath25 .
the second particle ( subject to the electromagnetic field generated by the first one ) is moving with velocity @xmath14 .
a section through the ( x , o , y ) plane can be seen in figure [ eminter ] .
the first particle is at point o and the second one is at point a. the electric field ( in gaussian units ) generated by the first particle at the position of the second particle is @xcite @xmath41^{-3/2}.\ ] ] the magnetic field generated by the first particle is @xmath42 the lorentz force acting on the second particle is @xmath43 from ( 17)-(19 ) the cartesian components of the force @xcite are obtained @xmath44^{-3/2 } [ \cos ( \theta ) + \sin ( \theta ) { v_y v \over c^2}]\ ] ] @xmath45^{-3/2 } \sin ( \theta ) ( 1 - { v_x v \over c^2})\ ] ] @xmath46 the force components ( 20)-(22 ) can be obtained in a more graphical way , if we start with the coulomb force generated by a charged particle at rest . one key assumption or experimental fact
is that in a frame where all the source charges producing an electric field @xmath47 are at rest , the force on a charge @xmath48 is given by @xmath49 independent of the velocity of the charge in that frame @xcite .
the reference frame k in which the source particle is at rest is moving with velocity @xmath13 relative to the original frame k. in the reference frame k the particle at a is observed to interact with the particle at o. the distance between particles is @xmath50 , the length of the segment @xmath51 . in the reference frame k the particle at a is observed to interact with the particle at b , where the segment @xmath52 is a position vector @xmath53 parallel to the plane ( x,o , y ) .
the following construction gives the position of point b : the segment @xmath54 is parallel to oy and intersects the ox axis at e , whereas the segment @xmath55 is parallel to ox and intersects the world - line @xmath56 at b. @xmath57 projects the point b on the ox axis at d. relative to k , the particle at b exerts a radial coulomb force on the particle at a. this force ( in gaussian units ) is @xmath58 where @xmath59 $ ] . the key point in getting the force @xmath60 in the reference frame k is to notice that the force , in any reference frame considered , is given by the projection on the real 3d space of that frame of the 4-force @xmath61 ( which is a minkowski - space vector ) , that is @xmath62 @xmath63 where @xmath64 and @xmath65 .
we will obtain the 4-force @xmath61 from its real and imaginary components ( @xmath66 and @xmath67 ) in the reference frame k , then we will decompose the same 4-force into its real and imaginary components ( @xmath68 and @xmath69 ) in the reference frame k. the lorentz force we are looking for is just @xmath70 . from ( 23)-(25 ) it follows that @xmath71 to get the imaginary component @xmath67 we use the orthogonality between the 4-force and the 4-velocity , @xmath72 , where the 4-velocity is @xmath73 .
the orthogonality condition leads to @xmath74 @xmath75 where the radial component of the velocity is @xmath76 the components of the force @xmath60 in the reference frame k are given by the projection of the 4-force @xmath61 on the 3d real space of k. an easy way to do this is to notice that we can decompose @xmath66 ( which has the direction of the segment @xmath52 ) and @xmath67 ( which has the direction of the segment @xmath77 ) into sums of 4-vectors , each of the 4-vectors being parallel to one of the axes of the reference frame k : @xmath78 @xmath79 because these expansions do not involve any component along the oz axis , this simply means that @xmath80 .
the projections of the 4-force on the ox and oy axes are @xmath81 @xmath82 the lengths of the various segments needed above are as follows : @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88^{1/2 } = r'\ ] ] we also notice that @xmath89 .
the force components in ( 32)-(33 ) become @xmath90^{3/2 } } \nonumber \\ & & + i { \gamma(v ' ) \over \gamma(v ) } { q_1 q_2 \over r^2 } { v'_{\rm rad } \over c } { \sin ( -\alpha ) \over \cos ^2(\alpha ) [ 1 + \tan ^2(\alpha ) \sin ^2(\theta)]}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath91^{3/2}}.\ ] ] we can also calculate @xmath92^{1/2}}\ ] ] @xmath93^{1/2}}.\ ] ] if the velocity of the particle at a has the components @xmath94 , as measured in the reference frame k , and k is moving with the velocity @xmath95 relative to k , then the particle will have the following components of the velocity ( compare with equations ( 12 ) and ( 16 ) ) in the reference frame k @xmath96 with these components we find that @xmath97 and the radial velocity ( 29 ) becomes @xmath98^{1/2}}.\ ] ] substituting @xmath99 and @xmath100 in ( 40)-(41 ) , and also using the fact that @xmath101 , @xmath102 and @xmath103 , we finally obtain the components in ( 20)-(21 ) .
we have presented a geometrical calculation of the relativistic addition of velocities , and of the electromagnetic interaction between two uniformly moving charged particles .
the geometrical approach used is an elegant , more intuitive and alternative way of obtaining these important results of special relativity .
we hope our work will usefully complement other pedagogical efforts @xcite centered on minkowski space diagrams .
purcell e m , _ electricity and magnetism _
( new york : mcgraw - hill , 1985 ) p 238 minkowski h , _ space and time _ , reprinted in einstein a , lorentz h a , weyl h , minkowski h , _ the principle of relativity _
( new - york : dover , 1952 ) einstein a , _ the meaning of relativity _ ( princeton : princeton university press , 1988 ) p 37 landau l and lifchitz e , _ th ' eorie du champ _
( moscow : mir , 1966 ) p 119 donnelly r and ziolkowski r w , electromagnetic field generated by a moving point charge : a fields - only approach , am . j. phys .
* 62 * ( 10 ) , october 1994 , p 916 rosser w g v , _ classical electromagnetism via relativity _
( new york : plenum press , 1968 ) p 32 jackson j d , _ classical electrodynamics _ ( new york : wiley , 1975 ) p 580 mermin d , an introduction to space - time diagrams , am .
* 65 * ( 6 ) , june 1997 , p 476 mermin d , space - time intervals as light rectangles , am .
* 66 * ( 12 ) , december 1998 , p 1077 saletan e j , minkowski diagrams in momentum space , am . j. phys .
* 65 * ( 8) , august 1997 , p 799 | special relativity in today s textbooks complex mathematical theory 1 spatial + 1 temporal dimensional minkowski diagrams introduce lorentz transformation time dilatation length contraction put aside approach differential calculus linear algebra little understanding of law of relativistic addition of velocities magnetism second - order effect from relativistic changes in electric fields of moving charges introducing elaborate minkowski diagrams geometrical derivations intuitive understanding physicist descartes philosophy complex plane like real plane two - dimensional vector space scalar products for real defined @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2,@xmath3@xmath4 are basis vectors both planes have scalar product about orthogonal vectors ( scalar product is zero magnitude of vector ( square root of scalar product vector allows circle locus of points equally spaced from point angle in radians length between two points circle trigonometric functions sine cosine magnitudes of projections of radius one vector on two coordinate axesdefinitions real and complex planes relations : @xmath5 @xmath6 ^ 2 + [ { d \over d\alpha } \cos(\alpha ) ] ^2 = 1.\ ] from ( 3)-(4 ) derivatives of trigonometric functions taylor series expansions of sine cosine known trigonometric relations angle @xmath7 real plane real complex plane imaginary non - positive definite scalar product last relevant differences complex plane as euclidean plane two vectors orthogonal if same angle with bisecting line first quadrant circle looks like hyperbola @xcite not line intersects right or left branch hyperbola pairs lines can assign angle triangles ratio of segments behaves as angle negative value true angle obtained by symmetry first bisecting line pair @xmath7 and @xmath8 indicates in figure [ velocity ] consider reference frame k moving with velocity @xmath9 particle velocity @xmath10 in reference frame k reference frames chosen origins particle coincide at space - time point o figure [ velocity @xmath11 and @xmath12 @xmath13 component in x direction oz axis not plotted similar to oy axisquestion velocity @xmath14 particle in reference frame k ? world - line op projected on complex planes ( x o y z angles from projections components velocity in two reference frames planes x o x,o coincide figure velocity @xmath15 express @xmath20 @xmath21 functions @xmath22 @xmath23 express @xmath24 @xmath25 as functions @xmath7@xmath26 @xmath27 plane ( x , o , ict ) lorentz boost addition velocities based on addition angles @xmath28 @xmath29 from ( 11 ) substitution tangents ( 5)-(9 ) @xmath30 two rectangles apcd bpce result from projection process @xmath31 @xmath32 from ( 13)-(14 ) follows @xmath33 substitutions tangents ( 5)-(8 ) @xmath34^{-1/2}$ ] get @xmath35 similar expression for @xmath36 component consider two charged particles @xmath37 @xmath38 ) at arbitrary positions moving with arbitrary uniform velocitiesorient 3d reference frame first particle generates field at origin moving ox axis velocity @xmath9 vector @xmath39 connecting two particles in x o y plane angle between @xmath40 ox axis @xmath25 second particle subject electromagnetic field first velocity @xmath14 section through x y plane in figure first particle at point o second at point a electric field gaussian first particle second particle @xcite @xmath41^{-3/2} magnetic field first particle @xmath42 lorentz force second particle @xmath43 17)-(19 ) cartesian components of force @xcite obtained @xmath44^{-3/2 } \cos \theta ) + \sin \theta v_y c^2 @xmath45^{-3/2 \sin \theta ) v_x c^2} @xmath46 force components ( 20)-(22 ) obtained coulomb force generated by charged particle at rest source charges electric field @xmath47 at rest force on charge @xmath48 given by @xmath49 independent of velocity charge reference frame k source particle rest with velocity @xmath13 original frame particle at a with particle at odistance between particles @xmath50 length segment @xmath51 reference frame k particle a with b segment @xmath52 position vector parallel to plane x y construction position point b segment @xmath54 parallel to oy intersects ox axis e @xmath55 parallel to ox intersects world - line @xmath56 b @xmath57 projects point b on ox axis d particle b exerts radial coulomb force on particle a force gaussian units @xmath58 @xmath59 force @xmath60 reference frame k given by projection 3d space 4-force @xmath61 minkowski - space vector @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 obtain 4-force @xmath61 from real imaginary components @xmath66 @xmath67 ) reference frame k decompose 4-force into components @xmath68 @xmath69 in reference frame k lorentz force @xmath70 @xmath71 imaginary component @xmath67 orthogonality between 4-force 4-velocity @xmath72 4-velocity is @xmath73 orthogonality condition leads to @xmath74 @xmath75 radial component velocity is @xmath76 components of force @xmath60 in reference frame k given by projection 4-force @xmath61 on 3d real space k decompose @xmath66 direction @xmath52 ) and @xmath67 direction @xmath77 ) into 4-vectors parallel to reference frame k : @xmath78 @xmath79 expansions involve component along oz axis @xmath80 projections 4-force on ox and oy axes are @xmath81 @xmath82 lengths of segments are @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88^{1/2 } = r' @xmath89 force components in ( 32)-(33 ) become @xmath90^{3/2 } \gamma(v )\alpha )(\alpha )(\theta) @xmath91^{3/2}}. calculate @xmath92^{1/2}} @xmath93^{1/2}}.velocity particle a has components @xmath94 measured reference frame k with velocity @xmath95 relative k components velocity compare equations ( 12 ) 16 ) reference frame k @xmath96 components @xmath97 radial velocity ( 29 ) becomes @xmath98^{1/2}} substituting @xmath99 @xmath100 in ( 40)-(41 ) using @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath103 obtain components ( 20)-(21 ) presented geometrical calculation relativistic addition velocities electromagnetic interaction between uniformly moving charged particles geometrical approach elegant intuitive alternative obtaining results special relativity work pedagogical efforts minkowski space diagrams purcell electricity magnetism new - 1985 p 238 minkowski h space time einstein lorentz weyl minkowski principle relativity dover 1952 meaning relativity princeton university 1988 p 37 landau l lifchitz e eorie du champ moscow 1966 ) p 119 donnelly r ziolkowski r electromagnetic field moving point charge fields - approach62 10 ) october 1994 916 rosser classical electromagnetism relativity new york plenum press 1968 32 jackson classical electrodynamics new wiley 1975 580 introduction space - time diagrams 65 ( 6 ) june 1997 476 space - time intervals light rectangles 66 12 december 1998 1077 saletan minkowski diagrams momentum space 65 ( 8) august 1997 799 | 0.498958 | 3,064 | 1,632 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,193 | finite difference schemes are here solved by means of a linear matrix equation .
the theoretical study of the related algebraic system is exposed , and enables us to minimize the error due to a finite difference approximation , while building a new drp scheme in the same time . * keywords * + drp schemes , sylvester equation | we hereafter propose a method that enables us to build a drp scheme while minimizing the error due to the finite difference approximation , by means of an equivalent matrix equation .
+ + consider the transport equation : @xmath0 , \,\,\,t \,\in \,[0,t]\ ] ] with the initial condition @xmath1
. a finite difference scheme for this equation can be written under the form : @xmath2 where : @xmath3
@xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 denoting respectively the mesh size and time step ( @xmath10 , @xmath11 ) .
+ the courant - friedrichs - lewy number ( @xmath12 ) is defined as @xmath13 .
+ + a numerical scheme is specified by selecting appropriate values of the coefficients @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 in equation ( [ scheme ] ) , which , for sake of usefulness , will be written as : @xmath23 where the `` @xmath24 '' denotes a dependance upon the mesh size @xmath8 , while the `` @xmath25 '' denotes a dependance upon the time step @xmath9 .
+ the number of time steps will be denoted @xmath26 , the number of space steps , @xmath27 . in general , @xmath28 .
+ in the following : the only dependance of the coefficients upon the time step @xmath9 existing only in the crank - nicolson scheme , we will restrain our study to the specific case : @xmath29 the paper is organized as follows .
the building of the drp scheme is exposed in section [ drp ]
. the equivalent matrix equation , which enables us to minimize the error due to the finite difference approximation , is presented in section [ sylv ] .
a numerical example is given in section [ ex ] .
the first derivative @xmath30 is approximated at the @xmath31 node of the spatial mesh by : @xmath32 following the method exposed by c. tam and j. webb in @xcite , the coefficients @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 are determined requiring the fourier transform of the finite difference scheme ( [ approx ] ) to be a close approximation of the partial derivative @xmath36 .
+ ( [ approx ] ) is a special case of : @xmath37 where @xmath38 is a continuous variable , and can be recovered setting @xmath39 .
+ denote by @xmath40 the phase . applying the fourier transform , referred to by @xmath41 , to both sides of ( [ approx_cont ] ) , yields : @xmath42 @xmath43 denoting the complex square root of @xmath44 .
+ comparing the two sides of ( [ wavenb ] ) enables us to identify the wavenumber @xmath45 of the finite difference scheme ( [ approx ] ) and the quantity @xmath46 , i. e. : the wavenumber of the finite difference scheme ( [ approx ] ) is thus : @xmath47 to ensure that the fourier transform of the finite difference scheme is a good approximation of the partial derivative @xmath48 over the range of waves with wavelength longer than @xmath49 , the a priori unknowns coefficients @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 must be choosen so as to minimize the integrated error : @xmath50 the conditions that @xmath51 is a minimum are : @xmath52 and provide the following system of linear algebraic equations : @xmath53 which enables us to determine the required values of @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 : @xmath54
the problem ( [ scheme ] ) can be written under the following matricial form : @xmath55 where @xmath56 and @xmath57 are square matrices respectively @xmath58 by @xmath58 , @xmath26 by @xmath26 , given by : @xmath59 the matrix @xmath60 being given by : @xmath61 and where @xmath62 is a linear matricial operator which can be written as : @xmath63 where @xmath64 , @xmath65 , @xmath66 and @xmath67 are given by : @xmath68 @xmath69 the second member matrix @xmath60 bears the initial conditions , given for the specific value @xmath70 , which correspond to the initialization process when computing loops , and the boundary conditions , given for the specific values @xmath71 , @xmath72 .
denote by @xmath73 the exact solution of ( [ transp ] ) .
+ the corresponding matrix @xmath74 will be : @xmath75_{\ , 1\leq i\leq { n_x-1},\ , 1\leq n\leq { n_t}\ , } } \ ] ] where : @xmath76 with @xmath77 , @xmath78 .
we will call _ error matrix _ the matrix defined by : @xmath79 consider the matrix @xmath80 defined by : @xmath81 the _ error matrix _ @xmath82 satisfies : @xmath83 minimizing the error due to the approximation induced by the numerical scheme is equivalent to minimizing the norm of the matrices @xmath82 satisfying ( [ eqmtr ] ) . _ note : _ since the linear matricial operator @xmath84 appears only in the crank - nicolson scheme , we will restrain our study to the case @xmath85 .
the generalization to the case @xmath86 can be easily deduced .
the problem is then the determination of the minimum norm solution of : @xmath87 which is a specific form of the sylvester equation : @xmath88 where @xmath89 and @xmath90 are respectively @xmath91 by @xmath91 and @xmath92 by @xmath92 matrices , @xmath93 and @xmath94 , @xmath91 by @xmath92 matrices .
calculation yields : @xmath95 the singular values of @xmath56 are the singular values of the block matrix @xmath96 , i. e. @xmath97 of order @xmath98 , and @xmath99 of order @xmath98 . + the singular values of @xmath57 are @xmath100 , of order @xmath101 , and @xmath102 , of order @xmath101 .
consider the singular value decomposition of the matrices @xmath56 and @xmath57 : @xmath103 where @xmath104 , @xmath105 , @xmath106 , @xmath107 , are orthogonal matrices .
@xmath108 , @xmath109 are diagonal matrices , the diagonal terms of which are respectively the nonzero eigenvalues of the symmetric matrices @xmath110 , @xmath111 .
+ multiplying respectively [ sylverr ] on the left side by @xmath112 , on the right side by @xmath107 , yields : @xmath113 which can also be taken as : @xmath114 set : @xmath115 @xmath116 we have thus : @xmath117 it yields : @xmath118 one easily deduces : @xmath119 the problem is then the determination of the @xmath120 and @xmath121 satisfying : @xmath122 denote respectively by @xmath123 , @xmath124 the components of the matrices @xmath125 , @xmath126 .
+ the problem [ pb ] uncouples into the independent problems : + minimize @xmath127 under the constraint @xmath128 this latter problem has the solution : @xmath129 the minimum norm solution of [ sylverr ] will then be obtained when the norm of the matrix @xmath130 is minimum .
+ in the following , the euclidean norm will be considered .
due to ( [ ftilde ] ) : @xmath131 @xmath104 and @xmath107 being orthogonal matrices , respectively @xmath58 by @xmath58 , @xmath26 by @xmath26 , we have : @xmath132 also : @xmath133 the norm of @xmath60 is obtained thanks to relation ( [ m0 ] ) .
this results in : @xmath134 @xmath135 can be minimized through the minimization of the second factor of the right - side member of ( [ min ] ) , which is function of the scheme parameters .
+ @xmath136 is a constant .
the quantities @xmath137 , @xmath138 and @xmath139 being strictly positive , minimizing the second factor of the right - side member of ( [ min ] ) can be obtained through the minimization of the following functions : @xmath140 i.e. : @xmath141 setting : @xmath142 one obtains the drp scheme with the minimal error through the minimization of : @xmath143
we denote by @xmath144 the non - dimensional time parameter .
figure [ erreur1 ] displays the @xmath145 norm of the error for an optimized scheme ( in black ) , where @xmath33 , @xmath34 , @xmath35 are given by ( [ opt_values1 ] ) , and a non - optimized one : numerical results perfectly fit the theoretical ones .
+ figure [ erreur2 ] displays the @xmath145 norm of the error for the above optimized scheme ( in black ) , a seven - point stencil drp scheme ( in gray ) , and the fcts scheme ( dashed plot ) . as time increases , the optimized scheme yields , as expected , better results than the fcts one .
also , for @xmath146 , results appear to be better than those of the classical drp scheme . for large values of the time parameter , both latter schemes yield the same results .
+ figure [ erreurl2 ] displays the @xmath147 norm of the error for the above optimized scheme ( in black ) , the seventh - order drp scheme ( in gray ) , and the fcts scheme ( dashed plot ) . as expected , results coincide .
the above results open new ways for the building of drp schemes .
it seems that the research on this problem has not been performed before as far as our knowledge goes . in the near future
, we are going to extend the techniques described herein to nonlinear schemes , in conjunction with other innovative methods as the lie group theory . | propose method build drp scheme minimizing error finite difference approximation equivalent matrix equation consider transport equation : @xmath0 \,t [0,t initial condition @xmath1 finite difference scheme written form @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath9 mesh size time step ( @xmath10 @xmath11 ) courant - friedrichs - lewy number ( @xmath12 ) defined as @xmath13 numerical scheme specified selecting values coefficients @xmath14 @xmath21 @xmath22 in equation ( [ scheme ] ) written as @xmath23 @xmath24 '' dependance mesh size @xmath8 @xmath25 dependance time step @xmath9 number of time steps denoted @xmath26 space steps @xmath27 @xmath28 only dependance coefficients upon time step @xmath9 in crank - nicolson scheme restrain study to specific case : @xmath29 paper organized building drp scheme exposed in section [ drp ] equivalent matrix equation error finite difference approximation presented in section [ sylv ] numerical example in section [ ex ] first derivative @xmath30 approximated at @xmath31 node spatial mesh by @xmath32 method c. tam j. webb coefficients @xmath33 @xmath35 determined fourier transform finite difference scheme close approximation of partial derivative @xmath36 special case of @xmath37 @xmath38 continuous variable recovered setting @xmath39 @xmath40 phase applying fourier transform @xmath41 both sides approx yields @xmath42 @xmath43 complex root of @xmath44 comparing two sides wavenb identify wavenumber @xmath45 finite difference scheme quantity @xmath46wavenumber finite difference scheme @xmath47 fourier transform good approximation partial derivative @xmath48 waves wavelength longer than @xmath49 a priori unknowns coefficients @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 choosen minimize integrated error @xmath50 conditions @xmath51 minimum @xmath52 system linear algebraic equations @xmath53 determine required values @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath54 problem written matricial form @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 square matrices @xmath58 @xmath26 @xmath59 matrix @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 linear matricial operator written @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 given @xmath68 @xmath69 second member matrix @xmath60 bears initial conditions specific value @xmath70 initialization process computing loops conditions specific values @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 exact solution transp corresponding matrix @xmath74 @xmath75_{ 1\leq\leq n_x-1} n\leq n_t} @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78call error matrix defined by @xmath79 consider matrix @xmath80 @xmath81 error matrix @xmath82 satisfies @xmath83 minimizing error approximation equivalent minimizing norm matrices @xmath82 satisfying linear matricial operator @xmath84 crank - nicolson scheme restrain study case @xmath85 generalization to @xmath86 deduced problem determination minimum norm solution @xmath87 specific form sylvester equation @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 are @xmath91 @xmath92 matrices calculation yields @xmath95 singular values @xmath56 are block matrix @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath98 singular values @xmath57 are @xmath100 @xmath102 singular value decomposition of matrices @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 orthogonal matrices @xmath108 @xmath109 diagonal matrices diagonal terms nonzero eigenvalues of symmetric matrices @xmath110 @xmath111multiplying sylverr ] left side @xmath112 right side @xmath107 yields @xmath113 @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath117 yields @xmath118 deduces @xmath119 problem determination @xmath120 @xmath121 satisfying @xmath122 @xmath123 @xmath124 components matrices @xmath125 @xmath126 problem uncouples into independent problems minimize @xmath127 constraint @xmath128 solution @xmath129 minimum norm solution sylverr obtained when norm matrix @xmath130 minimum euclidean norm considered due @xmath131 @xmath104 @xmath107 orthogonal matrices @xmath58 @xmath26 @xmath132 @xmath133 norm of @xmath60 obtained relation ( [ m0 ] results in @xmath134 @xmath135 minimized second factor right - side member min function scheme parameters @xmath136 constant quantities @xmath137 @xmath138 @xmath139 positive minimizing second factor right - side member obtained minimization functions @xmath140 @xmath141 setting @xmath142 obtains drp scheme minimal error minimization @xmath143 @xmath144 non - dimensional time parameterfigure erreur1 ] displays @xmath145 norm error optimized scheme black ) @xmath33 @xmath34 given by opt_values1 ] non - optimized one numerical results fit theoretical ones figure erreur2 ] displays @xmath145 norm error optimized scheme black seven - point stencil drp scheme gray fcts scheme dashed plot ) time increases optimized scheme yields better results fcts one @xmath146 results better classical drp scheme large values time parameter both schemes yield same results figure erreurl2 ] displays @xmath147 norm error optimized scheme black seventh - order drp scheme gray fcts scheme dashed plot ) results coincide results open new ways building drp schemes research problem not performed before extend techniques nonlinear schemes innovative methods lie group theory | 0.345631 | 2,337 | 1,237 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,197 | continuing our investigations of quenched qcd with improved fermions we have started simulations for lattice size @xmath0 at @xmath1 .
we present first results for light hadron masses at @xmath2 , @xmath3 , and @xmath4 .
moreover we compare our initial experiences on the t3e with those for ape / quadrics systems . | high computer costs turned out to be a major problem when performing quenched qcd simulations at smaller lattice spacing @xmath5 . improving the action in order to reduce cut - off effects therefore became an important goal . while standard gluonic action has discretization errors of @xmath6 , those for wilson fermions are of @xmath7 .
sheikholeslami and wohlert @xcite proposed a modified fermion action : @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the standard wilson action and @xmath10 if the coefficient @xmath11 of the so - called clover term is chosen appropriately , this action removes all @xmath7 errors from on - shell quantities like hadron masses . a non - perturbative calculation of @xmath11 as a function of @xmath12
was done by the alpha collaboration @xcite . until now
the qcdsf collaboration has presented results for the light hadron spectrum using the improved action for two values of the coupling , @xmath13 and @xmath14 ( see @xcite ) .
these calculations have been carried out on ape quadrics computers on lattice sizes up to @xmath15 . in order to allow a more reliable estimate of the chiral limit for @xmath16 we started calculations with a hopping parameter @xmath17 closer to the critical value , @xmath18 , on a lattice of size @xmath0 . at present
we have evaluated @xmath19 configurations .
we hope for higher statistics , and so the following results should be regarded as preliminary .
we perform the quenched qcd simulations at @xmath20 . to generate a new gauge configuration we use 100 cycles consisting of a single 3-hit metropolis sweep followed by 16 over - relaxation sweeps using the @xmath21 algorithm suggested by creutz @xcite .
we use jacobi smearing @xcite for source and sink .
we chose the number of smearing steps to be @xmath22 and for the smearing hopping parameter we took @xmath23 , for which the radius of the smeared source @xmath24 is about @xmath25 which roughly corresponds to @xmath26 .
although we have calculated the propagator for both smeared and unsmeared sink , we will only use the results for smeared sink here .
the simulations are performed for three different hopping parameters , @xmath27 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , with clover coefficient @xmath28 chosen according to @xcite . for the matrix inversion we mainly use bicgstab @xcite .
the minimal residue algorithm is used in case bicgstab does not converge . as convergence criterion we chose @xmath29 , where @xmath30 .
we found up to 4 configurations per @xmath17 which show an exceptional pattern ( see fig .
[ fig : except ] ) .
they have been excluded from the evaluation . with
separately plotted exceptional configurations.,height=222 ] [ fig : except ]
until now we have looked at the @xmath31 , @xmath32 and nucleon masses . we find good plateaus when plotting the effective mass @xmath33 $ ] , as shown in fig .
[ fig : effmass_pion ] for the @xmath31 .
[ fig : effmass_pion ] plots of the dimensionless ratio @xmath34 as a function of @xmath35 ( so - called ape plot ) were found to be rather different for improved and wilson fermions at @xmath13 @xcite . as can be seen from fig .
[ fig : ape ] , the results at @xmath16 seem to confirm that the improved results come closer to the physical value than the wilson results . [ fig : ape ] to see how masses scale as @xmath36 is changed , it has been suggested @xcite that @xmath37 should be plotted in units of the square - root of the string tension @xmath38 which has cut - off errors of @xmath6 only . in fig .
[ fig : scale ] the ratio @xmath39 is shown as a function of @xmath40 for fixed physical @xmath31 masses with @xmath41 , @xmath42 and @xmath43 . to obtain the @xmath32 mass for these values of @xmath44 we extrapolated , or interpolated , @xmath37 using the phenomenological ansatz @xcite @xmath45
on the @xmath0 lattice our current program needs @xmath46 per bicgstab iteration step on a t3e with 128 dec alpha 21164 5/375mhz microprocessors .
simulations done on a 256 node quadrics qh2 need @xmath47 for the same operations on a @xmath15 lattice . comparing the peak performance of both machines ( t3e : 96 gflops / qh2 : 12.8 gflops ) one would expect the t3e to do this job about twice as fast as the qh2 ( although the calculations on the t3e are done in double precision ) .
since the communication overhead in the bicgstab routines on the t3e is less then @xmath48 , this indicates a single processor performance problem .
while lattice gauge theory applications on the qh2 typically reach sustained speeds between @xmath49 and @xmath50 of the peak performance , our t3e code currently runs at about @xmath51 .
this might be explained by two disadvantages of the t3e for this kind of problems : the number of registers and the cache size of the dec 21164 microprocessors .
the stream buffers which improve main memory access make the code about @xmath52 faster .
the numerical calculations were performed on the cray t3e lc 512 - 512 at the hlrz jlich and the cray t3e lc 128 - 128 at the konrad - zuse - zentrum berlin .
we wish to thank the operating staff for their support .
11 b. sheikholeslami and r. wohlert , nucl .
b259 ( 1985 ) 572 . m. lscher et al , nucl .
b491 ( 1997 ) 323 , hep - lat/9609035 ; _ ibid _ b491 ( 1997 ) 344 , hep - lat/9611015 . m. gckeler , r. horsley , h. perlt , p. rakow , g. schierholz , a. schiller and p. stephenson , desy preprint desy 97 - 125 ( 1997 ) , hep - lat/9707021 .
p. stephenson et al . , this conference .
m. creutz , phys .
d36 ( 1987 ) 516 . c. r. allton et .
al . , phys .
d47 ( 1993 ) , 5128 .
h. van der vorst , siam j. sc .
stat . comp .
12 ( 1992 ) 631 .
a. frommer , v. hannemann , b. nockel , t. lippert and k. schilling , int .
j. mod .
c5 ( 1994 ) 1073 .
r. sommer , phys .
rep . 275 ( 1996 ) 1 . c. r. allton v. gimenez , l. giusti , and f. rapuano , nucl .
b489 ( 1997 ) 427 .
s. collins , nucl . phys .
b ( proc . suppl . ) 30 ( 1993 ) 393 . | computer costs problem qcd simulations smaller lattice spacing @xmath5 improving action reduce cut - off effects important standard gluonic action discretization errors @xmath6 wilson fermions @xmath7 sheikholeslami wohlert proposed modified fermion action @xmath8 @xmath9 standard wilson action @xmath10 coefficient @xmath11 removes @xmath7 errors from - quantities non - perturbative calculation @xmath11 @xmath12 alpha collaboration qcdsf collaboration presented results light hadron spectrum improved action @xmath13 @xmath14 calculations on ape quadrics computers lattice sizes up to @xmath15 reliable estimate chiral limit @xmath16 started calculations hopping parameter @xmath17 to critical value @xmath18 lattice size @xmath0 evaluated @xmath19 configurations hope higher statistics results preliminary qcd simulations at @xmath20 new gauge configuration 100 cycles single 3-hit metropolis sweep 16 over - relaxation sweeps @xmath21 algorithm jacobi smearing for source sinkchose smearing steps @xmath22 smearing hopping parameter took @xmath23 radius smeared source @xmath24 @xmath25 corresponds to @xmath26 calculated propagator for smeared unsmeared sink only use results smeared sink simulations performed for three hopping parameters @xmath27 @xmath3 @xmath4 clover coefficient @xmath28 chosen @xcite matrix inversion use bicgstab @xcite minimal residue algorithm used case bicgstab converge convergence criterion chose @xmath29 @xmath30 found 4 configurations per @xmath17 exceptional pattern fig excluded from evaluation separately plotted exceptional configurations looked at @xmath31 @xmath32 nucleon masses good plateaus plotting effective mass @xmath33 shown fig plots of dimensionless ratio @xmath34 function @xmath35 different for improved wilson fermions at @xmath13 @xcite results at @xmath16 confirm improved results closer to physical value than wilson resultsfig ape masses scale @xmath36 changed suggested @xmath37 plotted units square - root string tension @xmath38 cut - off errors @xmath6 fig scale ratio @xmath39 function @xmath40 @xmath31 masses @xmath41 obtain @xmath32 mass values @xmath44 extrapolated @xmath37 phenomenological ansatz @xmath45 @xmath0 lattice program needs @xmath46 per bicgstab iteration step t3e 128 dec alpha 21164 5/375mhz microprocessors simulations 256 node quadrics qh2 need @xmath47 operations @xmath15 lattice peak performance t3e 96 gflops qh2 12.8 gflops t3e twice fast qh2 calculations t3e double precision communication overhead routines t3e less @xmath48 indicates single processor performance problem lattice gauge theory applications qh2 reach speeds @xmath49 @xmath50 peak t3e code runs @xmath51 disadvantages t3e number registers cache size dec 21164 microprocessors stream buffers main memory access code @xmath52 fasternumerical calculations performed cray lc 512 - 512 hlrz jlich 128 - 128 konrad - zuse - zentrum berlin operating staff support sheikholeslami wohlert nucl b259 ( 1985 ) 572 lscher b491 1997 ) 323 - lat/9609035 b491 1997 ) 344/9611015 gckeler horsley perlt rakow schierholz schiller stephenson 97 - 125 ( 1997 ) hep - lat/9707021 stephenson creutz phys . d36 ( 1987 ) 516 allton . d47 ( 1993 ) 5128 van der vorst siam stat 12 ( 1992 ) 631 frommer hannemann nockel lippert schilling c5 ( 1994 ) 1073 sommer phys .. 275 ( 1996 ) 1 allton gimenez giusti rapuano nucl b489 ( 1997 ) 427 collins phys . 30 ( 1993 ) 393 | 0.263931 | 1,671 | 880 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,206 | in this contribution we describe knedle - the new event display for the kloe-2 experiment .
the basic objectives and software requirements are presented .
the current status of the development is given along with a short discussion of the future plans . | the kloe-2 is an upgraded version of the kloe detector which is installed at da@xmath0ne , the e@xmath1e@xmath2 collider located at the frascati laboratories of infn .
the newly installed subdetectors are ( i ) the inner tracker @xcite for the improvement of the vertex position resolution and the acceptance increase for low transverse momentum tracks ; ( ii ) two pairs of small angle tagging devices for detection of low ( low energy tagger - let @xcite ) and high ( high energy tagger - het @xcite ) , energy electrons and positrons from @xmath3 reactions ; ( iii ) crystal calorimeters ( ccalt ) for covering of the low polar angle region to increase acceptance for very forward electrons and photons down to 8 deg @xcite , and a tile calorimeter ( qcalt ) for detection of photons coming from @xmath4 decays in the drift chamber @xcite .
currently , the intensive work involving commissioning of new detectors is being performed . at the same time , new programming procedures are being developed , e.g. reconstruction procedures for the inner tracker .
one of the tools that can be particularly useful to quickly verify the correctness of reconstruction algorithms or to reveal some malfunctioning of the detectors parts is the so - called event display .
this program permits to graphically visualize reconstructed trajectories or energies of detected particles on event by event basis . in this contribution
we present knedle ( _ kloe new event display environment _ ) , the new event display for the kloe-2 detector .
didone ( _ dafne interactions display _ ) is a previous event display for the kloe detector . its graphical layout is based on the opacs graphical libraries written entirely in c language .
it interfaces the content of several ybos banks created by the reconstruction program with the kloe database .
although , didone is still operational , e.g. particle trajectories reconstructed in the drift chamber can be visualized , there are important arguments that favored the development of an entirely new display .
the first argument is that the program is outdated .
as it was mentioned before , its core is based on opacs package system , which is an abandoned project , without any support available .
the use of callback functions combined with a lack of documentation make the current code very hard to maintain .
in addition , the didone display runs only on aix server , and a significant amount of time would be needed to make it compatible with modern linux systems .
therefore , the decision was made to stop the previous project , and to concentrate on the development of a new solution based on the root libraries .
the knedle event display aims to replace and enhance the functionality of didone .
the application should contain the graphical user interface with the visualization of different detector components .
it was decided that in the first development stage , the event display for inner tracker , following the drift chamber part should be implemented , but the final version will include also other detector s parts . to make it possible to run on personal computers and on the kloe server , the program must work both on aix and linux operating systems .
finally the appropriate documentation should be provided along the development of the project .
the knedle application is written in c++ with the object - oriented approach .
it uses a several root @xcite libraries like geometry library to implement detectors geometry .
the graphical user interface is implemented using qt - like gui library . for the backward compatibility with the root version available on the kloe server ( root 5.08 compiled with xlc++ ) , some of the packages features were deliberately ommited .
the application contains a configurable logger , that delivers the login information that can be printed on the screen or saved to a special file .
the quality of the code is assured by a set of unit tests .
the boost unit test environment @xcite was chosen for this purpose .
the code documentation can be generated using doxygen @xcite .
finally , the whole source code is store on a git repository .
the knedle internal architecture was designed in a modular form , in order to easily extend it with further detector components . in order to separate a given graphical representation from data ,
the model - view - controller pattern has been applied ( see fig . [
fig : archi ] ) .
the dataprocessor is responsible for reading the data and providing it for the visualization .
the edgui manges graphical user interface along with the different detector views .
the controller mediates between the dataprocessor and the edgui module .
the communication between the controller module and the user interface is implemented using the signal - slot technique .
the edroottuplereader is responsible for reading the data in the tree root format .
the current version of the event display implements the inner tracker and drift chamber geometries .
it permits for the visualization of the x - strips layers ( for the geometry details please refer to @xcite ) on the event by event basis .
along with the graphical representation , the basic text information is displayed ( see fig . [
fig : view ] ) .
the button `` save to picture '' permits to save the current view in the `` png '' format .
in this article , we presented knedle , the new event display for the kloe-2 detector .
it is a root - based application written in c++ , that can be compiled and run on the kloe server ( aix ) and separately on the linux operating system .
the current version implements several views of the inner tracker and the drift chamber .
it permits to visualize the inner tracker strips by layers .
also the procedure to visualize the trajectories in the drift chamber is ready to use .
the program supports the root tree format as an input data .
the operation with the ybos files is planned to be added in the near future .
this work was supported in part by the eu integrated infrastructure initiative hadron physics project under contract number rii3-ct- 2004 - 506078 ; by the european commission under the 7th framework programme through the _ research infrastructures _ action of the _ capacities _ programme , call : fp7-infrastructures-2008 - 1 , grant agreement no .
227431 ; by the polish national science centre through the grants no .
0469/b / h03/ 2009/37 , 0309/b / h03/2011/40 , 2011/03/n / st2/02641 , 2011/01/d / st2/ 00748 , 2011/03/n / st2/02652 , 2013/08/m / st2/00323 , 2014/12/s / st2/00459 and by the foundation for polish science through the mpd programme and the project homing plus bis/2011 - 4/3 .
00 a. balla et al.,_acta phys . pol .
_ , vol . 6 , no . 4 , 1053 ( 2013 )
a. di cicco and g. morello , _ acta .
phys . pol .
b _ this number ( 2014 ) .
d. babusci et al . , _ nucl .
instr . & meth .
_ * a617 * , 81 ( 2010 ) .
f. archilli et al . , _ nucl .
instr . & meth .
_ * a617 * , 266 ( 2010 ) .
f. happacher et al .
197 _ , 215 ( 2009 ) .
m. cordelli et al . , _ nucl .
instr . & meth .
_ * a617 * , 105 ( 2010 ) .
boost - website of the project http://www.boost.org/ doxygen - website of the project www.doxygen.org
r. brun and f. rademakers , _ nucl
. inst . & meth .
_ * a389 * 81 - 86 ( 1997 ) .
see also http://root.cern.ch/. | kloe-2 upgraded version kloe detector installed at da@xmath0ne e@xmath1e@xmath2 collider frascati laboratories infn newly installed subdetectors are inner tracker @xcite vertex position resolution acceptance low transverse momentum tracks small angle tagging devices detection low high energy electrons positrons from @xmath3 reactions crystal calorimeters ( ccalt ) low polar angle region acceptance forward electrons photons down to 8 deg @xcite tile calorimeter ( qcalt ) detection photons from @xmath4 decays in drift chamber @xcite work commissioning new detectors performed new programming procedures developed reconstruction procedures for inner tracker verify reconstruction algorithms malfunctioning event display program visualize reconstructed trajectories energies of detected particles event event knedle ( kloe new event display environment new event display for kloe-2 detector didone ( dafne interactions display previous event display kloe detector graphical layout based on opacs graphical libraries c language interfaces ybos banks with kloe database didone still operationalparticle trajectories in drift chamber visualized arguments favored new display first argument program outdated core based on opacs package system abandoned project without support callback functions lack of documentation make current code hard to maintain didone display runs on aix server significant time needed to with modern linux systems decision stop previous project concentrate on new solution root libraries knedle event display replace enhance functionality didone application graphical user interface visualization of detector components first development stage event display for inner tracker drift chamber part implemented final version include other detector s parts computers kloe server program must work on aix and linux systems appropriate documentation provided along development project knedle application written in c++ object - oriented approach uses root @xcite libraries geometry library detectors geometry graphical user interface using qt - like gui library for backward compatibility with root version on kloe server some packages features ommited application contains configurable logger delivers login information printed screen or saved to special file quality code assured by unit tests boost unit test environment @xcite chosen code documentation generated using doxygen @xcite source code on git repository knedle architecture designed modular to extend with detector components separate graphical representation from data model - view - controller pattern applied fig . dataprocessor for reading data visualization edgui manges graphical user interface detector views controller mediates between dataprocessor edgui module communication using signal - slot technique edroottuplereader reading data in tree root format current version event display implements inner tracker drift chamber geometries permits visualization of x - strips layers event by event basis basic text information displayed fig button `` save to picture '' current view in png format presented knedle new event display for kloe-2 detector root - based application written in c++ compiled run on kloe server aix linux operating system current version implements views of inner tracker drift chamber permits visualize inner tracker strips by layers procedure to visualize trajectories in drift chamber ready to use program supports root tree format input data operation with ybos files planned to be added futuresupported eu infrastructure initiative hadron physics project contract rii3-ct- 2004 - 506078 european commission 7th framework programme research infrastructures capacities programme fp7-infrastructures-2008 - 1 grant agreement 227431 polish national science centre grants 0469 2009 0309/b st2/00323 st2/00459 foundation polish science mpd programme project homing plus bis/2011 - 4/3 balla._acta phys . pol . vol . 6 , no . 4 , 1053 ( 2013 ) di cicco morello acta phys 2014 babusci et al nucl . instr . meth . a617 81 ( 2010 ) archilli et al nucl instr meth a617 266 ( 2010 ) happacher 197 215 2009 ) cordelli nucl . instr . meth a617 105 2010 ) boost - website doxygen r. brun f rademakers nucl . inst . meth . a389 81 - 86 ( 1997 ) http://root.cern.ch | 0.270025 | 1,725 | 837 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,207 | * abstract . * in this short note we study the semantics of two basic computational effects , exceptions and states , from a new point of view . in the handling of exceptions
we dissociate the control from the elementary operation which recovers from the exception . in this way
it becomes apparent that there is a duality , in the categorical sense , between exceptions and states . | in this short note we study the semantics of two basic computational effects , exceptions and states , from a new point of view .
exceptions are studied in section [ sec : exceptions ] .
the focus is placed on the exception `` flags '' which are set when an exception is raised and which are cleared when an exception is handled .
we define the _ exception constructor _ operation which sets the exception flag , and the _ exception recovery _ operation which clears this flag .
states are considered in the short section [ sec : states ] . then in section [ sec : dual ] we show that our point of view yields a surprising result : there exists a symmetry between the computational effects of exceptions and states , based on the categorical duality between sums and products . more precisely , the lookup and update operations for states are respectively dual to the constructor and recovery operations for exceptions .
this duality is deeply hidden , since the constructor and recovery operations for exceptions are mixed with the control .
this may explain that our result is , as far as we know , completely new .
states and exceptions are _ computational effects _ : in an imperative language there is no type of states , and in a language with exceptions the type of exceptions which may be raised by a program is not seen as a return type for this program . in this note
we focus on the denotational semantics of exceptions and states , so that the sets of states and exceptions are used explicitly .
however , with additional logical tools , the duality may be expressed in a way which fits better with the syntax of effects @xcite .
other points of view about computational effects , involving monads and lawvere theories , can be found in @xcite .
however it seems difficult to derive from these approaches the duality described in this note .
the syntax for exceptions heavily depends on the language . for instance in ml - like languages
there are several exception _ names _ , and the keywords for raising and handling exceptions are ` raise ` and ` handle ` , while in java there are several exception _ types _ , and the keywords for raising and handling exceptions are ` throw ` and ` try - catch ` . in spite of the differences in the syntax ,
the semantics of exceptions share many similarities .
a major point is that there are two kinds of values : the ordinary ( i.e. , non - exceptional ) values and the exceptions .
it follows that the operations may be classified according to the way they may , or may not , interchange these two kinds of values : an ordinary value may be `` tagged '' for constructing an exception , then the `` tag '' may be cleared in order to recover the value .
first let us focus on the raising of exceptions .
let @xmath0 denote the set of _ exceptions_. the `` tagging '' process can be modelled by injective functions @xmath1 called the _
exception constructors _ , with disjoint images : for each index @xmath2 in some set of indices @xmath3 , the exception constructor @xmath1 maps a non - exceptional value ( or _ parameter _ ) @xmath4 to an exception @xmath5 .
when a function @xmath6 _ raises _ ( or _ throws _ ) an exception of index @xmath2 , the following _ raising _ operation is called : @xmath7 the raising operation @xmath8 is defined as the exception constructor @xmath9 followed by the inclusion of @xmath0 in @xmath10 . given a function @xmath6 and an element @xmath11 , if @xmath12 for some @xmath4 then one says that @xmath13 _ raises an exception of index @xmath2 with parameter @xmath14 into @xmath15_. one says that a function @xmath16 _ propagates exceptions _ when it is the identity on @xmath0 . clearly , any function @xmath6 can be extended in a unique way as a function which propagates exceptions .
now let us study the handling of exceptions .
the process of clearing the `` exception tags '' can be modelled by functions @xmath17 called the _ exception recovery _
operations : for each @xmath18 and @xmath19 the exception recovery operation @xmath20 tests whether the given exception @xmath21 is in the image of @xmath9 .
if this is actually the case , then it returns the parameter @xmath4 such that @xmath22 , otherwise it propagates the exception @xmath21 . for handling exceptions of indices
@xmath23 raised by some function @xmath6 , one provides a function @xmath24 , which may itself raise exceptions , for each @xmath25 in @xmath26 .
then the handling process builds a function which propagates exceptions , it may be named @xmath27 or @xmath28 : @xmath29 using the recovery operations @xmath30 , the handling process can be defined as follows .
999 = 999 = 999 = 999 = for each @xmath31 , @xmath32 is defined by : + // _ if @xmath33 was an exception before the @xmath34 , then it is just propagated _
+ if @xmath35 then return @xmath36 ; + // _
now @xmath33 is not an exception _ + compute @xmath37 ; + if @xmath38 then return @xmath39 ; + // _
now @xmath40 is an exception _ + for @xmath41 repeat + compute @xmath42 ; + if @xmath43 then return @xmath44 ; + // _
now @xmath40 is an exception but it does not have index @xmath45 , for any @xmath46 _ + return @xmath47 .
given an exception @xmath21 of the form @xmath48 , the recovery operation @xmath49 returns the non - exceptional value @xmath14 while the other recovery operations propagate the exception @xmath21 .
this is expressed by the equations ( [ eq : exceptions - explicit ] ) in figure [ fig : exceptions ] . whenever @xmath50 with the @xmath9 s as coprojections , then equations ( [ eq : exceptions - explicit ] ) provide a characterization of the operations @xmath49 s .
* for each index @xmath18 : * a set @xmath51 ( parameters ) * two operations @xmath1 ( exception constructor ) + and @xmath52 ( exception recovery ) * and two equations : @xmath53 which correspond to commutative diagrams , where @xmath54 and @xmath55 are the injections : @xmath56_{{\mathit{m}}_i } \\ { \mathit{exc}}\ar[u]^{c_i } & { \mathit{par}}_i \ar[l]^{t_i } \ar[u]_{{\mathit{id } } } \ar@{}[ul]|{= } \\ } \qquad \qquad \xymatrix@r=1pc@c=2pc { { \mathit{par}}_i+{\mathit{exc } } & { \mathit{exc}}\ar[l]_(.3){{\mathit{n}}_i } & { \mathit{par}}_j \ar[l]_{t_j } \\ { \mathit{exc}}\ar[u]^{c_i } & & { \mathit{par}}_j \ar[ll]^{t_j } \ar[u]_{{\mathit{id } } } \ar@{}[ull]|{= } \\ } \ ] ]
now let us forget temporarily about the exceptions in order to focus on the semantics of an imperative language .
let @xmath57 denote the set of _ states _ and @xmath58 the set of _ locations _ ( also called _
variables _ or _ identifiers _ ) . for each location @xmath2 ,
let @xmath59 denote the set of possible _ values _ for @xmath2 .
for each @xmath60 there is a _ lookup _
operation @xmath61 for reading the value of location @xmath2 in the given state .
in addition , for each @xmath60 there is an _ update _ operation @xmath62 for setting the value of location @xmath2 to the given value , without modifying the values of the other locations in the given state .
this is summarized in figure [ fig : states ] . whenever @xmath63 with the @xmath64 s as projections , two states @xmath65 and @xmath66 are equal if and only if @xmath67 for each @xmath2 , and equations ( [ eq : states - explicit ] ) provide a characterization of the operations @xmath68 s .
* for each location @xmath60 : * a set @xmath59 ( values ) * two operations @xmath69 ( lookup ) + and @xmath62 ( update ) * and two equations : @xmath70 which correspond to commutative diagrams , where @xmath71 and @xmath72 are the projections : @xmath73^{{\mathit{p}}_i } \ar[d]_{u_i } & { \mathit{val}}_i \ar[d]^{{\mathit{id } } } \\ { \mathit{st}}\ar[r]_{l_i } & { \mathit{val}}_i \ar@{}[ul]|{= } \\ } \qquad\qquad \xymatrix@r=1pc@c=2pc { { \mathit{val}}_i\times{\mathit{st}}\ar[r]^(.7){{\mathit{q}}_i } \ar[d]_{u_i } & { \mathit{st}}\ar[r]^{l_j } & { \mathit{val}}_j \ar[d]^{{\mathit{id } } } \\ { \mathit{st}}\ar[rr]_{l_j } & & { \mathit{val}}_j \ar@{}[ull]|{= } \\ } \ ] ]
our main result is now clear from figures [ fig : exceptions ] and [ fig : states ] .
[ theo : duality ] the duality between categorical products and sums can be extended as a duality between the semantics of the lookup and update operations for states on one side and the semantics of the constructor and recovery operations for exceptions on the other side . in @xcite an equational presentation of states is given , with seven families of equations .
these equations can be translated in our framework , and it can be _ proved _ that they are equivalent to equations ( [ eq : states - explicit ] ) @xcite
. then by duality we get for free seven families of equations for exceptions .
for instance , it can be proved that for looking up the value of a location @xmath2 only the _ previous _ updating of this location @xmath2 is necessary , and dually , when throwing an exception constructed with @xmath9 only the _ next _ recovery operation @xmath49 , with the same index @xmath2 , is necessary . | short note study semantics of computational effects exceptions states new point of view exceptions studied in section exceptions focus on exception flags set when exception raised cleared when handled define exception constructor operation sets exception flag exception recovery operation clears flag states considered in section states section : dual ] show view surprising result symmetry between computational effects exceptions states based categorical duality between sums products lookup update operations for states dual to constructor recovery operations for exceptions duality hidden constructor recovery operations for exceptions mixed with control result new states exceptions are computational effects imperative language no type of states language with exceptions type exceptions raised program not seen as return type for program focus on denotational semantics of exceptions states sets states exceptions used explicitly with additional logical tools duality may expressed better with syntax of effects @xcite other points of view about computational effects monads lawvere theories found in @xcite difficult to derive duality described note syntax for exceptions depends on languagein ml - like languages several exception names keywords for ` raise handle ` in java several exception types keywords ` throw try - catch ` differences syntax semantics of exceptions share similarities two kinds values ordinary non - exceptional values and exceptions operations interchange values ordinary value tagged for constructing exception tag cleared to recover value focus on raising of exceptions @xmath0 denote set of exceptions_ tagging process modelled by injective functions @xmath1 exception constructors each index @xmath2 in set indices @xmath3 exception constructor @xmath1 maps non - exceptional value @xmath4 to exception @xmath5 function @xmath6 raises exception of index @xmath2 raising operation called : @xmath7 raising operation @xmath8 defined as exception constructor @xmath9 followed inclusion of @xmath0 in @xmath10 function @xmath6 element @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath4 @xmath13 raises exception of index @xmath2 with parameter @xmath14 into @xmath15_ function @xmath16 propagates exceptions when identity on @xmath0 any function @xmath6 can extended as propagates exceptionsstudy handling exceptions clearing exception tags modelled by functions @xmath17 exception recovery operations @xmath18 @xmath19 exception recovery operation @xmath20 tests exception @xmath21 in image @xmath9 if returns parameter @xmath4 otherwise propagates exception @xmath21 handling exceptions indices @xmath23 raised function @xmath6 provides function @xmath24 raise exceptions for each @xmath25 @xmath26 handling process builds function propagates exceptions named @xmath27 or @xmath28 @xmath29 recovery operations @xmath30 defined 999 = each @xmath31 @xmath32 defined by if @xmath33 exception before @xmath34 propagated if @xmath35 return @xmath36 @xmath33 not exception compute @xmath37 @xmath38 return @xmath39 @xmath40 exception @xmath41 compute @xmath42 @xmath43 return @xmath44 @xmath40 exception index @xmath45 @xmath46 return @xmath47 exception @xmath21 @xmath48 recovery operation @xmath49 returns non - exceptional value @xmath14 other recovery operations propagate exception @xmath21 expressed by equations in figure@xmath50 @xmath9 s coprojections equations operations @xmath49 index @xmath18 set @xmath51 parameters two operations @xmath1 exception constructor @xmath52 exception recovery ) two equations @xmath53 commutative diagrams @xmath54 @xmath55 injections @xmath56_{{\mathit{m}}_i \mathit{exc}}\ar[u]^{c_i\mathit{par}}_i \ar[l]^{t_i\ar[u]_{{\mathit{id }\ar@{}[ul]|{=\qquad \xymatrix@r=1pc@c=2pc \mathit{par}}_i{\mathit{exc } \mathit{exc}}\ar[l]_(\mathit{n}}_i \mathit{par}}_j \ar[l]_{t_j \mathit{exc}}\ar[u]^{c_i \mathit{par}}_j\ar[ll]^{t_j[u]_{{\mathit{id }\ar@{}[ull]|{= forget exceptions focus semantics imperative language @xmath57 denote states @xmath58 locations variables each location @xmath2 @xmath59 denote possible values @xmath2each @xmath60 lookup operation @xmath61 reading value location @xmath2 state each @xmath60 update operation @xmath62 setting value location @xmath2 value without modifying values other locations state summarized figure states @xmath63 @xmath64 projections states @xmath65 @xmath66 equal if @xmath67 each @xmath2 equations operations @xmath68 s each location @xmath60 set @xmath59 values two operations @xmath69 ( lookup @xmath62 update ) two equations @xmath70 commutative diagrams @xmath71 @xmath72 projections @xmath73^{{\mathit{p}}_i \ar[d]_{u_i \mathit{val}}_i \mathit{st}}\ar[r]_{l_i\mathit{val}}_i{[ul]|{\xymatrix@r=1pc@c=2pc \mathit{val}}_i{\mathit{st}}\ar[r]^(.7){{\mathit{q}}_i } \ar[d]_{u_i } { \mathit{st}}\ar[r]^{l_j } \mathit{val}}_j ^{{\mathit{id } } } { \mathit{st}}\ar[rr]_{l_j } { \mathit{val}}_j \ar@{}[ull]|{= } \\ main result clear from figures exceptions states ] duality between categorical products sums extended lookup update operations for states constructor recovery operations for exceptions in @xcite equational presentation of states seven families equations translated in framework proved equivalent to equations states - @xcite duality free seven families equations for exceptions looking up value location @xmath2 previous updating @xmath2 necessary exception constructed with @xmath9 next recovery operation @xmath49 same index @xmath2 necessary | 0.350797 | 2,388 | 1,336 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,208 | in type - i superconducting cylinders bulk superconductivity is destroyed above the first critical current . below the second critical current the ` type - i mixed state ' displays fluctuation superconductivity which contributes to the total current .
a magnetic flux on the axis of the cylinder can change the second critical current by as much as 50 percent so that half a flux quantum can switch the cylinder from normal conduction to superconductivity : the aharonov
bohm effect manifests itself in macroscopically large resistance changes of the cylinder . | the superconducting condensate can be used as a ` quantum amplifier ' .
for example , microscopic effects such as quantum interference of electron waves become macroscopically measurable as flux quantization . in this work
the macroscopic condensate is used to make the aharonov
bohm effect prominent on macroscopic scales .
consider a wire of radius @xmath0 with a current @xmath1 parallel to the wire axis .
the superconductivity of a type - i superconductor breaks down when the current exceeds the silsbee current @xmath2 .
the silsbee current is determined from the condition that the magnetic field at the surface of the wire is equal to the upper critical field @xmath3 , @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is the speed of light . for @xmath6 , the so - called intermediate state forms in the wire with alternating normal and superconducting domains @xcite .
the diameter of the superconducting domains @xmath7 shrinks and finally the intermediate state collapses when @xmath7 becomes of the order of the coherence length @xmath8 .
however , superconductivity still remains in the form of small temporal fluctuations . in this ` mixed state ' for type - i superconductors , superconducting fluctuations and electrical and magnetic fields
co - exist .
the mixed state was first predicted by l.d .
landau in 1938 @xcite as a surface state for hollow superconducting cylinders .
its existence was later verified experimentally by i.l .
landau and yu.v .
sharvin @xcite .
as later shown by andreev and bestgen @xcite the fluctuation induced superconductivity is destroyed when the thickness of the fluctuation layer becomes smaller than the coherence length @xmath8 , and superconductivity is ultimately destroyed at the second critical current @xmath9 which was first calculated by andreev @xcite . an externally applied magnetic field @xmath10 parallel to the wire axis contributes to the suppression of the superconducting phase and reduces @xmath2 and @xmath9 accordingly @xcite . in this work
we investigate the stability of the mixed state in type - i superconductors for a hollow cylinder of inner radius @xmath11 in a magnetic field @xmath10 with an additional magnetic flux line of strength @xmath12 on the cylinder axis .
we show that the aharonov
bohm effect leads to strong oscillations of the second critical current @xmath13 as a function of @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the flux quantum .
the effect is particularly marked for the ` one - dimensional ' mixed state for which @xmath16 . in this case
, @xmath13 can vary by almost 50 percent .
if the applied current through the wire is fixed at some value @xmath17 , the modulation of @xmath18 between integer flux quanta will lead to a periodic onset and breakdown of the superconducting current @xmath19 as a function of @xmath18 .
the resistance @xmath20 at applied voltage @xmath21 becomes @xmath22 therefore , the aharonov
bohm effect leads to periodic fluctuations in the resistance of type - i superconductors in the mixed state .
in the mixed state with @xmath23 , the dynamics of the superconducting fluctuations at the inner cylinder surface is described by the time - dependent , linear ginzburg
landau equations with langevin forces . in dimensionless
cylindrical coordinates @xmath24 they read @xcite @xmath25 with the differential operator @xmath26 and the gaussian fluctuations @xmath27 the dimensionless parameters @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 are given by @xmath32 @xmath33 is the coherence length , @xmath34 is the relaxation frequency , and @xmath35 and @xmath36 are the electron charge and mass , respectively .
@xmath37 is the electrical field which drives the total current @xmath38 in @xmath39-direction . for type - i superconductors
was shown in @xcite that @xmath40 . using the linearized ginzburg
landau equations implies that @xmath41 .
the general expression for the total longitudinal fluctuation current is calculated along the lines of @xcite and gives the result @xmath42 with @xmath43\;\text{.}\ ] ] @xmath44 is the lowest eigenvalue of @xmath45 as a function of @xmath46 where @xmath47 is the wavenumber vector in @xmath39-direction .
the spectrum @xmath44 can be obtained with the help of a variational method , which starts from the ansatz @xmath48 for the radial part of @xmath49 .
we may restrict ourselves to the dominant contribution , @xmath50 @xcite ; @xmath51 is a variational parameter which determines the radial extension of the superconducting region@xcite . from the variation principle we then find for @xmath52 @xmath53 with @xmath54 k_{m}=\frac{-\beta\left(|m-\delta|+1\right)}{4\alpha}\;\text{.}\end{gathered}\ ] ]
the critical current can be evaluated analytically in the vicinity of the critical curve @xcite but for our further analysis explicit expressions for @xmath55 are not required .
we merely state that the experimental parameters can be tuned in such a way that the fluctuation current is several percent of the total current , i.e. , the resistance fluctuations according to ( [ ohm ] ) should be measurable .
in our theory , the critical current @xmath56 above which the superconducting fluctuations vanish is determined by the condition @xmath57=1 \label{(8 ) } \ ; .\ ] ] if the minimum over all @xmath58 was noticeably smaller than unity the corresponding supercurrent would become so large that the use of a linearized ginzburg
landau equations would not have been justified .
if the minimum over all @xmath58 was substantially larger than unity @xmath55 would be tiny .
our theory applies to the transition region where the supercurrent is small but measurable .
solving ( [ ( 8) ] ) for @xmath9 leads to the second critical current as a function of the external magnetic field and applied flux in the interior of the cylinder . in si units we find : @xmath59^{1/2}\;\text{,}\nonumber \label{(9)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath60 for a given flux @xmath31 , @xmath36 in ( [ ( 9 ) ] ) is the integer which gives the minimal @xmath9@xcite .
figure [ fig1 ] gives a three - dimensional plot of @xmath9 as a function of @xmath30 ( external field ) and @xmath31 ( central flux ) . for @xmath16.[fig1],width=529 ]
the second critical current can be almost halved by the application of a suitable vector potential even if no magnetic field is present .
this is a macroscopic realization of the aharonov - bohm effect .
in this work we have studied the supercurrent in a hollow cylinder of type - i superconducting material in the presence of an external magnetic field and a flux line on the cylinder axis .
we have shown that the second critical current , above which fluctuation superconductivity breaks down , periodically changes as a function of the applied flux , by as much as 50 percent in the absence of an external field .
these aharonov
bohm oscillations lead to a periodic change of the resistance of the cylinder , see ( [ ohm ] ) .
the latter are measurable because the currents due to the superconducting fluctuations are sizable , of the order of a few percent of the total current .
therefore , a suitably tuned experiment with type - i superconducting cylinders should be able to verify the aharonov
bohm effect by macroscopic resistance measurement . | superconducting condensate as quantum amplifier microscopic effects quantum interference macroscopically measurable as flux quantization macroscopic condensate aharonov bohm effect macroscopic consider wire radius @xmath0 current @xmath1 parallel to axis superconductivity breaks down when current exceeds silsbee current @xmath2 determined from magnetic field surface wire equal to upper critical field @xmath3 @xmath5 speed of light for @xmath6 intermediate state forms with normal superconducting domains diameter superconducting domains shrinks intermediate state collapses when coherence length @xmath8 superconductivity remains small temporal fluctuations in mixed state for superconductors superconducting fluctuations electrical magnetic fields co - exist mixed state predicted by l.d . landau 1938 superconducting cylinders verified by i.l. landau yu.v . sharvin fluctuation induced superconductivity destroyed when thickness fluctuation layer smaller than coherence length @xmath8 at second critical current @xmath9 calculated by andreevmagnetic field @xmath10 parallel wire axis superconducting phase reduces @xmath2 @xmath9 @xcite stability mixed state type - i superconductors hollow cylinder magnetic field additional magnetic flux line @xmath12 cylinder axis aharonov bohm effect leads oscillations second critical current @xmath13 function @xmath14 flux quantum effect marked one - mixed state @xmath13 vary 50 percent applied current wire fixed @xmath17 modulation @xmath18 flux periodic onset breakdown superconducting current @xmath19 function @xmath18 resistance @xmath20 applied voltage becomes @xmath22 aharonov bohm effect leads periodic fluctuations resistance - superconductors mixed state mixed state @xmath23 dynamics superconducting fluctuations inner cylinder surface described time - dependent linear ginzburg landau equations langevin forces dimensionless cylindrical coordinates @xmath24 read @xcite @xmath25 differential operator @xmath26 gaussian fluctuations @xmath27 dimensionless parameters @xmath28 given @xmath32 coherence length relaxation frequency electron charge mass@xmath37 electrical field drives total current @xmath38 @xmath39-direction type - i superconductors shown @xcite @xmath40 linearized ginzburg landau equations implies @xmath41 expression total longitudinal fluctuation current calculated @xcite result @xmath42 with @xmath43 @xmath44 lowest eigenvalue @xmath45 function @xmath46 @xmath47 wavenumber vector @xmath39-direction spectrum @xmath44 obtained variational method starts ansatz @xmath48 radial part @xmath49 restrict dominant contribution @xmath50 @xcite @xmath51 variational parameter determines radial extension superconducting region@xcite variation principle @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54{-\beta\left-\delta\right\alpha critical current evaluated analytically critical curve @xcite explicit expressions @xmath55 not required experimental parameters tuned fluctuation current percent total current resistance fluctuations ohm measurable critical current @xmath56 superconducting fluctuations vanish determined condition @xmath57=1if minimum @xmath58 smaller than unity supercurrent large linearized ginzburg landau equations if minimum @xmath58 larger @xmath55 tiny theory applies to transition region supercurrent small but measurable solving ( 8) ] ) for @xmath9 leads to second critical current function of external magnetic field applied flux interior cylinder units @xmath59^{1/2}{aligned @xmath60 given flux @xmath31 , @xmath36 in 9 integer minimal @xmath9@xcite figure three - dimensional plot of @xmath9 function of @xmath30 external field @xmath31 central flux for @xmath16. second critical current halved by suitable vector potential even if no magnetic field macroscopic realization of aharonov - bohm effect studied supercurrent in hollow cylinder of type - i superconducting material external magnetic field flux line on cylinder axis second critical current changes applied flux by 50 percent in absence external field aharonov bohm oscillations lead to periodic change resistance cylinder currents due to superconducting fluctuations sizable few percent of total currenttuned experiment type - i superconducting cylinders verify effect macroscopic resistance measurement | 0.306138 | 1,765 | 883 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,211 | we present the joint threshold and recoil resummed transverse momentum distributions for heavy quark hadroproduction , at next - to - leading logarithmic accuracy .
we exhibit their dependence on the production channel and the color configurations , and compare these distributions to eachother and to nlo . | the formalism @xcite of hadronic cross sections for the joint resummation of distributions singular at partonic threshold and at zero recoil has so far been applied to @xmath0 production @xcite , higgs production @xcite , and prompt photon hadroproduction @xcite . for the latter @xmath1 process ,
the formalism implements the notion that , in the presence of qcd radiation , the actual transverse momentum produced by the hard collision is not @xmath2 but rather @xmath3 , with @xmath4 the total transverse momentum of unobserved soft recoiling partons .
the joint - resummed partonic @xmath5 spectrum has the form of a hard scattering cross section as a function of @xmath6 , convoluted with a _ perturbative _ , albeit resummed @xmath4 distribution .
we have extended @xcite the joint resummation formalism to the @xmath5 distribution of heavy quarks produced in hadronic collisions .
key differences with the prompt - photon case are , first , the presence of the heavy quark mass @xmath7 , preventing a singularity in the hard scattering function when @xmath8 and , second , the possibility of multiple colored states for the produced heavy quark pair .
we consider the inclusive @xmath5 distribution of a heavy quark produced via the strong interaction in a hadron - hadron collision at center of mass ( cm ) energy @xmath9 .
exact higher order corrections to the differential cross sections for these partonic processes have been computed to nlo @xcite . up to corrections
@xmath10 , the observable may at any order @xcite be written in the following factorized form @xmath11 with @xmath12 the partonic differential cross - section , @xmath13 and @xmath14 parton densities , and @xmath15 the factorization / renormalization scale .
threshold enhancements essentially involve the energy of soft gluons . in the context of the factorization ( [ eq : crs - def ] ) we define hadronic and partonic threshold by the conditions @xmath16 and @xmath17 , respectively , with @xmath18 the transverse mass @xmath19 .
it is convenient to define the scaling variables @xmath20 so that hadronic ( partonic ) threshold is at @xmath21 ( @xmath22 ) .
the higher order corrections to the partonic cross section @xmath23 contain distributions that are singular at partonic threshold .
threshold resummation organizes such distributions to all orders .
there are also recoil effects , resulting from radiation of soft gluons from initial - state partons .
we wish to treat these effects in the context of joint threshold and recoil resummation .
we identify a hard scattering with reduced cm energy squared @xmath24 and at transverse momentum @xmath25 with respect to the hadronic cm system .
this hard scattering produces a heavy quark with transverse momentum @xmath26 the kinematically allowed range for the invariant mass @xmath27 of the heavy quark pair in this hard scattering is limited from below by @xmath28 so that threshold in the context of joint resummation is defined by @xmath29 a refactorization analysis @xcite leads to the following expression for the observable in eq .
( [ eq : crs - def ] ) @xmath30 where @xmath31 is a cut - off and @xmath32 notice in particular the last factor , which provides a kinematic link between recoil and threshold effects
. the exponential functions @xmath33 @xcite are to next - to - leading logarithmic ( nll ) accuracy @xmath34 2\ln\frac{\bar n \mu'}{q } -g b^2
\,,\qquad \bar n = n e^{\gamma_e}\,,\ ] ] where the coefficients @xmath35 and @xmath36 can be found elsewhere @xcite , and the function @xmath37 is chosen to reproduce either nll resummed recoil or threshold distributions in the appropiate limits @xcite .
we also added to the perturbative exponent the non - perturbative ( np ) gaussian smearing term @xmath38 , in terms of the impact parameter @xmath39 .
we have introduced the variables @xmath40 the functions @xmath41 are the mellin moments of the lowest order heavy quark production matrix elements for either the @xmath42 or @xmath43 channel , as appropiate , the index labeling the color - state of the heavy quark pair .
their explicit expressions can be found elsewhere@xcite .
the threshold - resummed result can now easily be derived , by substituting eq .
( [ eq:2 ] ) into ( [ eq:8 ] ) and neglecting @xmath4 in the last factor in eq .
( [ eq:2 ] )
. then the @xmath4 integral sets @xmath44 to zero everywhere , yielding the threshold - resummed result . to illustrate these analytic results ,
we show for the case of top quark production at the tevatron the @xmath5 distribution for the dominant @xmath45 channel in fig .
[ fig : ptspectra_qq ] .
we observe that , while the resummed and nlo curves are close for small and moderate @xmath5 ( the inset provides a somewhat better view of the low @xmath5 region ) , for large @xmath5 values the resummed curves depart significantly from the nlo curve .
of course , cross sections for top quark production at such large @xmath5 at the tevatron are far too small to be measured , so that our plots at large @xmath5 have only theoretical interest . for such large @xmath5 values , the hadronic threshold , defined in eq .
, approaches the partonic one , where larger @xmath46 values dominate , a prerequisite for seeing significant effects for both resummations .
the enhancements relative to the born cross section are shown in the form of a k - factor .
threshold resummation produces an overall enhancement of the cross section that increases with increasing @xmath5 , yielding e.g. an enhancement over nlo at @xmath47 .
joint resummation almost doubles that effect : the joint - resummed enhancement at large @xmath5 effectively constitutes a smearing of the threshold - resummed @xmath5 spectrum by a resummed recoil function .
this work was supported by the netherlands foundation for fundamental research of matter ( fom ) and the national organization for scientific research ( nwo ) .
li , phys . lett . *
b454 * , 328 ( 1999 ) , hep - ph/9812363 .
e. laenen , g. sterman , and w. vogelsang , phys . rev . *
d63 * , 114018 ( 2001 ) , hep - ph/0010080 .
g. sterman and w. vogelsang , phys . rev . *
d71 * , 114013 ( 2005 ) , hep - ph/0409234 a. kulesza , g. sterman , and w. vogelsang , phys . rev . *
d66 * , 014011 ( 2002 ) , hep - ph/0202251 .
a. kulesza , g. sterman , and w. vogelsang , phys . rev . *
d69 * , 014012 ( 2004 ) , hep - ph/0309264 .
e. laenen , g. sterman , and w. vogelsang , phys .
rev . lett . * 84 * , 4296 ( 2000 ) , hep - ph/0002078 .
a. banfi and e. laenen , phys .
d * 71 * ( 2005 ) 034003 , hep - ph/0411241 .
p. nason , s. dawson , and r. k. ellis , nucl . phys . *
b327 * , 49 ( 1989 ) .
w. beenakker , h. kuijf , w. l. van neerven , and j. smith , phys . rev . *
d40 * , 54 ( 1989 ) .
w. beenakker , w. l. van neerven , r. meng , g. a. schuler , and j. smith , nucl .
b351 * , 507 ( 1991 ) .
m. l. mangano , p. nason , and g. ridolfi , nucl .
b373 * , 295 ( 1992 ) .
j. c. collins , d. e. soper , and g. sterman , in _ perturbative quantum chromodynamics _ ,
mueller ed .
, world scientific , singapore , 1989 . | formalism of hadronic cross sections resummation distributions at partonic threshold zero recoil applied to @xmath0 higgs production prompt photon hadroproduction qcd radiation transverse momentum hard collision not @xmath3 @xmath4 total transverse momentum soft recoiling partons joint - resummed partonic @xmath5 spectrum hard scattering cross section @xmath6 perturbative @xmath4 distribution extended joint resummation formalism to @xmath5 distribution of heavy quarks hadronic collisions differences prompt - photon case presence heavy quark mass preventing singularity scattering multiple colored states for heavy quark pair inclusive @xmath5 distribution of heavy quark strong interaction hadron - hadron collision at center mass energy @xmath9 corrections to differential cross sections processes computed to nlo @xcite corrections @xmath10 observable written in factorized form @xmath11 with @xmath12 partonic differential cross - section parton densities factorization / renormalization scale threshold enhancements involve energy of soft gluonsfactorization define hadronic partonic threshold conditions @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 transverse mass @xmath19 define scaling variables @xmath20 hadronic threshold at @xmath21 @xmath22 higher order corrections partonic cross section @xmath23 contain distributions singular at partonic threshold threshold resummation organizes distributions orders recoil effects radiation soft gluons initial state partons treat effects joint threshold recoil resummation identify hard scattering reduced cm energy @xmath24 transverse momentum @xmath25 hadronic cm system produces heavy quark transverse momentum @xmath26 allowed range invariant mass @xmath27 heavy quark limited by @xmath28 threshold joint resummation defined by @xmath29 refactorization analysis leads expression observable @xmath30 @xmath31 cut - off @xmath32 last factor kinematic link between recoil threshold effectsexponential functions @xmath33 @xcite logarithmic accuracy @xmath34 2\bar n b^2 n = e^{\gamma_e} coefficients @xmath35 @xmath36 found elsewhere function @xmath37 reproduce nll resummed recoil or threshold distributions added perturbative exponent non - perturbative np gaussian smearing term @xmath38 impact parameter @xmath39 introduced variables @xmath40 functions @xmath41 mellin moments lowest order heavy quark production matrix elements @xmath42 or @xmath43 channel index labeling color - state heavy quark pair explicit expressions elsewhere threshold - resummed result derived substituting eq . ( [ eq:2 ] ) into [ eq:8 ] ) neglecting @xmath4 last factor @xmath4 integral sets @xmath44 to zero threshold - resummed result top quark production tevatron @xmath5 distribution dominant @xmath45 channel fig . resummed nlo curves close for small moderate @xmath5 large @xmath5 values curves depart from nlo curvecross sections for top quark production at large @xmath5 at tevatron small measured plots at large @xmath5 theoretical interest large @xmath5 values hadronic threshold defined approaches partonic one larger @xmath46 values dominate prerequisite for significant effects resummations enhancements born cross section shown k - factor threshold resummation enhancement cross section increases with @xmath5 enhancement over nlo at @xmath47 joint resummation doubles effect joint - resummed enhancement at large @xmath5 smearing threshold - resummed @xmath5 spectrum by resummed recoil function work supported by netherlands foundation for fundamental research national organization for scientific research b454 328 ( 1999 ) hep - ph/9812363. laenen g sterman w vogelsang d63 114018 ( 2001 ) hep - ph/0010080 114013 ( 2005 ) hep - ph/0409234 kulesza d66 014011 ( 2002 ) hep - ph/0202251 d69 014012 ( 2004 ) hep - ph/0309264vogelsang phys 84 4296 2000 ) hep - ph/0002078 a. banfi e. laenen phys 71 2005 ) 034003 hep - ph/0411241 p. nason s. dawson r k ellis b327 49 1989 ) beenakker kuijf l neerven j. phys d40 54 1989 ) beenakker r. meng schuler j. smith nucl b351 507 ( 1991 ) mangano. nason g. ridolfi nucl b373 295 ( 1992 ) j c. collins soper g. sterman perturbative quantum chromodynamics mueller world scientific 1989 | 0.311482 | 1,955 | 1,006 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,212 | lorentz violation in the quark sector induces a sidereal time dependence in electron - proton , proton - antiproton and proton - proton cross sections . at high energies
nonperturbative effects are buried in universal nucleon parton distribution functions and lorentz violating effects are calculable in perturbation theory .
we focus on deep inelastic electron - proton scattering data collected from zeus and h1 at hera and show that a sideral time analysis of these events is able to set strong constraints on most of the coefficients we consider .
we consider lorentz violation in the quark sector as parametrized by the following lagrangian:@xcite @xmath0 where the coefficients @xmath1 ( @xmath2 ) are poorly constrained.@xcite these coefficients are obviously related to the corresponding coefficients for proton and neutron but the connection is heavily clouded by nonperturbative physics . in a recent work@xcite
we study the effects of these coefficients on the deep inelastic electron - proton cross section for which factorization theorems show that nonperturbative effects are confined to universal nucleon parton distribution functions .
details of the calculation can be found in ref . .
here we present a short summary of the main phenomenological results .
we focus on the complete set of deep inelastic @xmath3 measurements performed by the zeus and h1 experiments at the hera collider.@xcite note that these measurements enter the global fits used to extract the proton parton distribution functions , therefore it is impossible to extract bounds on the coefficients @xmath4 from measurements of the sidereal time integrated cross section . after taking into account the location and orientation of the zeus and h1 detectors the relation between the coefficients @xmath1 in the laboratory frame and the sun - centered frame acquires a sidereal time ( @xmath5 ) dependence .
the cross section at fixed values of bjorken @xmath6 and @xmath7 ( electron 4-momentum transfer squared ) can be schematically written as : @xmath8 \ ; , \label{eq : xs}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath9 is the sidereal time frequency and @xmath10 are functions of @xmath6 and @xmath7 .
these functions are completely determined in terms of fundamental standard - model parameters ( that we take from the particle data group@xcite ) and of the parton distribution functions of the proton ( for our central values we adopt the ct10 pdfs set@xcite and use the program maneparse@xcite ) .
note that the coefficients @xmath11 enter without any sidereal time dependence and can not be constrained by our analysis . for each hera measurement
we integrate eq .
( [ eq : xs ] ) in four sidereal time bins and set to zero all but one of the @xmath4 coefficients .
the expected upper bounds that this analysis might imply can be calculated by generating a large number of pseudoexperiments that are consistent with the sidereal time averaged results ( i.e. , the published cross sections ) . for each pseudoexperiment
we write a chi squared and extract the 95% upper limit on @xmath12 .
the expected upper limit is the median of this quantity over all pseudoexperiments . since the orientation of the zeus and h1 experiments are opposite to each other the rotations required to connect the laboratory frames at zeus and h1 to the sun - centered frame are different , but this has no effect on the bounds for individual coefficients @xmath4 .
the results of this analysis are presented in the first column of table [ eltab : results ] where we consider the 12 coefficients @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , and @xmath18 ( @xmath19 ) and show the constraints that a potential sidereal time analysis of zeus and h1 data might produce . here
we consider each hera measurement ( at fixed @xmath6 and @xmath7 ) and show the strongest constraint . in fig .
[ fig_bounds_up ] we show the upper limits expected from a sidereal time analysis of hera data on @xmath20 and @xmath21 as a function of @xmath7 ( left plot ) and @xmath6 ( right plot ) ; each point corresponds to one of the 644 neutral current hera measurements.@xcite the strongest constraints come mostly from measurements at low @xmath7 and low @xmath6 ( very close to the kinematical boundary @xmath22 ) .
constraints on these two coefficients are representative of constraints on @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
finally we perform a global sidereal time analysis of the whole hera data set by combining all measurements into a single chi squared .
the expected upper limits that we obtain are listed in the third column of table [ eltab : results ] .
these constraints are stronger than the best single measurement limits because this analysis makes full use of the correlations between the binned integrated cross sections at different values of @xmath6 and @xmath7 . in conclusion
, we found that a sidereal time analysis of zeus and h1 data has the potential to set strong constraints on most @xmath4 coefficients . | this work was supported in part by the indiana university center for spacetime symmetries . | supported indiana university center spacetime symmetries | 0.06464 | 19 | 10 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,213 | we present the most recent results of searches for physics beyond the standard model using the cdf and the d@xmath0o detector at the fermilab tevatron collider .
all results shown correspond to analysis performed using the past 1992 - 1996 fermilab tevatron run i data ( roughly @xmath1 @xmath2 per each experiment ) . in particular we report on searches for scalar top and scalar bottom particles together with other _
classic _ supersymmetry analysis .
results from non standard model higgs searches are also summarized . | although , at present , the standard model ( sm ) provides a remarkably successful description of known phenomena , there are plenty of aspects that we do not understand yet and that may suggest the sm to be most likely a low energy effective theory of spin-1/2 matter fermions interacting via spin-1 gauge bosons @xcite .
an excellent candidate to a new theory , able to describe physics at arbitrarily high energies , is supersymmetry ( susy ) .
susy is a large class of theoretical models based on the common assumption that there exist in nature a fermion - boson symmetry .
a comprehensive susy search is almost impossible because of the large amount of truly independent parameters .
the strategy is then to search for signals suggested by particular models in which theoretical assumptions are also adopted to reduce the number of free parameters to a few . in supersymmetry fermions can couple to a sfermion and a fermion , violating lepton and/or baryon number . to avoid this problem , a discrete multiplicative quantum number ,
the @xmath3-parity was introduced @xcite : @xmath4 .
susy models can be constructed assuming either conservation or violation of this quantum number ( rpv ) .
search for scalar top squark is particularly interesting as the strong yukawa coupling between top / stop and higgs fields give rise to potentially large mixing effects and mass splitting .
such effects can lead the lightest top - squark mass eigenstate @xmath5 to be lighter than the other squarks : @xmath6 @xcite .
when a set of susy parameters such as @xmath7 , @xmath8 and tan(@xmath9 ) @xcite is suitably tuned , light bottom squarks may also occur .
+ both the cdf and d@xmath0o experiments have searched for direct stop quark pair production : @xmath10 with @xmath5 decaying into the following channels : @xmath11 , @xmath12 @xcite and @xmath13 @xcite .
cdf has also searched for indirect stop quark production trough the top quark decay : @xmath14 with @xmath15 @xcite .
searches for direct scalar bottom production @xmath16 with the sbottom decaying into : @xmath17 have been performed from both tevatron experiments @xcite .
an overview on such results can be found in @xcite .
cdf searched for a pair produced scalar top squark decaying via non - zero @xmath3-parity violating coupling @xmath18 to @xmath19 @xcite .
the experimental signature of this process is two @xmath20 leptons and two @xmath21 quarks in the final state .
events have been selected by requiring a lepton ( @xmath22 or @xmath8 ) from @xmath23 , a hadronically decaying tau lepton and two jets .
the principal background processes are @xmath24 , @xmath25jets , @xmath26 , drell - yan and diboson events
. we observed , combining both the muon @xmath27 and the electron channel @xmath28 , that no events passed the selection cuts .
this is consistent with the expected sm background of @xmath29 events in the electron channel and @xmath30 in the muon channel . a 95% _ c.l .
_ lower limit on the stop quark mass have been set : @xmath31 @xmath32 gev/@xmath33 , for a dominant @xmath18 coupling .
the more recent and competitive result on the lower limit of the stop mass with this signature comes from aleph / lep experiment @xcite .
the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) predicts five physical higgs bosons : a charged pair ( @xmath34 , @xmath35 ) , two cp - even scalars ( @xmath36 , @xmath37 ) and a cp - odd ( @xmath38 ) .
cdf has searched for a neutral mssm higgs @xmath39 , where @xmath39 means @xmath40 or @xmath41 or @xmath7 , produced in association with @xmath42 : @xmath43 .
the analysis is based on on @xmath44 pb@xmath45 of data corresponding to the run 1b multijet sample . with basic parameter choices for both the susy scale and the stop mixing
, we obtained a 95% c.l . on the lower mass value for @xmath39 in a region of susy parameter space where : tan@xmath9 @xmath46 30 .
these results are summarized in fig .
[ fig : h1h2 ] .
the charged higgs particle ( @xmath47 ) may be observed through the following top quark decay : @xmath48 .
this process is favored over the sm one : @xmath49 if m@xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 in two separate tan(@xmath9 ) regions : tan(@xmath9)@xmath51 @xmath53 and tan(@xmath9)@xmath46 @xmath54 @xcite . 3.74 in 2.5 in both cdf and d@xmath0o searched for charged higgs . in particular the cdf direct search was performed requiring a high-@xmath55 central lepton ( @xmath56 @xmath53 , @xmath57 @xmath58 gev , @xmath59 @xmath22 or @xmath8 ) as well as a central @xmath20 lepton with @xmath60 @xmath61 gev , 2 jets and missing transverse energy ( @xmath62 ) with significance : @xmath63 gev@xmath64 .
better results have been obtained both from cdf and d@xmath0o performing an indirect search based on the suppression of sm @xmath65 decays caused by the presence of the competitive channel @xmath66 .
[ fig : ff2 ] ( left ) show the 95% c.l .
excluded region as a function of tan(@xmath9 ) .
cdf recently searched for gluino pair production using like - sign ( ls ) top events .
the analysis have been performed using @xmath67 pb@xmath45 of run i data . in the susy model under study
the scalar top squark is not only the lightest squark but also the only one lighter than gluino and satisfy the condition : @xmath68 @xmath69 . therefore @xmath70 is the preferred decay channel and because of the majorana nature of gluinos they give rise to ls top quarks from @xmath71 decays . in order to search for such events cdf used the top dilepton events .
the results of this search are shown in fig .
[ fig : ff2 ] ( right ) ; no mass limits have been set due to the presence of three signal events and to the inability to probe gluino masses in the region close to the top mass , where the stop mass is forced to be unreasonably light .
tevatron experiments performed extensive searches for physics beyond the standard model using the data collected during the 1992 - 1996 run i. recent results on such searches have been reported .
no evidence for physics beyond the standard model have been found so that 95% c.l .
limit have been set for the different scenarios described in the present paper . with the run
ii upgrades , providing a higher acceptance and 3.74 in 2.8 in higher luminosity , it will be possible to make important progress in the search for new phenomena .
we would like to thank the organizers of the _ xiii convegno sulla fisica al lep _ for the excellent conference and for their kind hospitality .
the definition of these parameters can be found for example in the paper : d. i. kazakov , beyond the standard model ( in search of susy ) , hep - ph/0012288 _ proceedings of the european school on high energy physics , 2000_. c. pagliarone , _ proceedings of 13th topical conference on hadron collider physics _
, + mumbai , 14 - 20 jan 1999 ; fermilab - conf-99 - 062-e .
+ c. pagliarone , _ proceedings of crimean summer school - seminar on new trends in high - energy physics _ , crimea , 27 may - 4 jun 2000 ; fermilab - conf-00 - 217-e . | standard model ( sm ) provides successful description phenomena aspects suggest likely low energy theory of spin-1/2 matter fermions interacting via spin-1 gauge bosons candidate new theory high energies is supersymmetry ( susy ) susy large theoretical models fermion - boson symmetry comprehensive susy search impossible large independent parameters strategy search for signals suggested by models reduce free parameters to few supersymmetry fermions can couple to sfermion fermion violating lepton baryon number avoid @xmath3-parity introduced @xcite : @xmath4 susy models conservation or violation of quantum number search for scalar top squark interesting strong yukawa coupling between top stop higgs fields large mixing effects mass splitting lightest top - squark mass @xmath5 lighter susy parameters @xmath7 @xmath8 tan@xmath9 ) @xcite tuned light bottom squarks may occur cdf and d@xmath0o experiments searched for direct stop quark pair production @xmath5 decaying into channels @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13cdf searched indirect stop quark production top quark decay @xmath14 @xmath15 searches direct scalar bottom production @xmath16 decaying @xmath17 performed tevatron experiments @xcite overview results @xcite cdf searched pair scalar top squark decaying non - zero @xmath3-parity @xmath18 @xmath19 experimental signature two @xmath20 leptons two @xmath21 quarks final state events selected lepton @xmath22 @xmath23 hadronically decaying tau lepton two jets principal background processes @xmath24 @xmath25jets @xmath26 drell - yan diboson events @xmath28 no events passed selection cuts consistent expected sm background @xmath29 events @xmath30 95% lower limit stop quark mass set @xmath31 @xmath32@xmath33 dominant @xmath18 coupling recent result aleph / lep experiment @xcite model predicts five physical higgs bosons charged pair @xmath34 two cp - even scalars cp - odd @xmath38cdf searched neutral mssm higgs @xmath39 with @xmath42 @xmath43 analysis based @xmath44@xmath45 data run 1b multijet sample parameter choices susy scale stop mixing obtained 95% c.l . lower mass value @xmath39 susy parameter space tan@xmath9 @xmath46 30 results summarized fig . charged higgs particle @xmath47 observed top quark decay @xmath48 process favored over sm one @xmath49@xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 two tan(@xmath9 ) regions @xmath54 cdf d@xmath0o searched charged higgs cdf direct search high-@xmath55 central lepton @xmath56 @xmath59 @xmath8 central @xmath20 lepton @xmath60 @xmath61 gev 2 jets missing transverse energy ( @xmath62 ) @xmath63 gev@xmath64 better results cdf d@xmath0o indirect search suppression sm @xmath65 decays competitive channel @xmath66 fig : ff2 95% c.l . excluded region function tan(@xmath9 )cdf searched for gluino pair production like - sign top events analysis using @xmath67@xmath45 run i data susy model scalar top squark lightest lighter than gluino condition @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 preferred decay channel majorana gluinos rise to ls top quarks from @xmath71 decays cdf used top dilepton events results shown in fig . no mass limits set due three signal events inability probe gluino masses close top mass stop mass light tevatron experiments searches for physics beyond standard model data 1992 - 1996 run i results no evidence for physics beyond standard model found 95% c.l . limit set for scenarios run ii upgrades higher acceptance 3.74 2.8 higher luminosity progress search new phenomena organizers xiii convegno sulla fisica al lep for conference hospitality definition parameters in paper : kazakov beyond standard model search susy hep - ph/0012288 proceedings european school high energy physics 2000 pagliarone proceedings 13th conference hadron collider physics mumbai 14 - 20 jan 1999 fermilab - conf-99 - 062-epagliarone crimean summer school seminar high energy physics 27 may 4 jun 2000 fermilab conf-00 | 0.306487 | 1,846 | 967 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,224 | we re - examine the theoretical uncertainty in the standard model expression for @xmath0-@xmath1 mixing .
we focus on lattice calculations of the ratio @xmath2 , needed to relate the oscillation frequency of @xmath3-@xmath4 mixing to @xmath5 .
we replace the usual linear chiral extrapolation with one that includes the logarithm that appears in chiral perturbation theory .
we find a significant shift in the ratio @xmath2 , from the conventional @xmath6 to @xmath7 . | the standard model ( sm ) expression for @xmath1@xmath0 mixing , @xmath8 where @xmath9 , can be used to determine the ckm element @xmath10 .
this result can be compared to other determinations to test the sm . in eq.([eq : delta ] ) the quantities in parenthesis are precisely known and @xmath11 @xcite . a measurement of @xmath12 , at the percent level
, is expected at the tevetron @xcite .
@xmath10 is therefore dominated by qcd uncertainties in the hadronic matrix element , @xmath13 [ \bar{b}\gamma_\mu ( 1-\gamma^5)q]|b_q^0\rangle$ ] , which is known to @xmath14 by lattice qcd @xcite .
@xmath15 can be computed directly , or parameterised as @xmath16 and reconstructed from separate determinations of @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
the latter approach is useful when studying the light quark mass dependence .
a recent discussion of the methodologies and results is in ref .
@xcite .
the percent - level accuracies of @xmath12 and @xmath19 make it instructive to form the ratio @xmath20 ckm unitarity implies @xmath21 and therefore @xmath22 .
current uncertainty on @xmath23 is 2 - 4% , so the error in @xmath24 is largely due to the uncertainty in @xmath25 .
conventional wisdom holds that in the ratio @xmath25 many systemtic uncertainties cancel , implying a precise determination of @xmath24 is possible . however , typical lattice calculations use @xmath26 . to reach physical light quark masses
the results are chirally extrapolated .
the usual linear and quadratic fits , which may be reasonable in the region of lattice data , fail to account for the presence of chiral logarithms predicted by chiral perturbation theory @xcite .
the effect of these logs was first explored by jlqcd @xcite and included in the error budget of @xmath2 in ref .
we argue that these logarithms change the extrapolation and therefore the value of @xmath2 in the chiral limit .
we find a shift in @xmath2 from @xmath27 to @xmath28 .
further details of this work are in ref .
@xcite .
= 7.5 cm fig .
[ fig : rhoeta ] shows how @xmath29 and @xmath30 combine to constrain the apex of the unitarity triangle .
the effect of a shift in @xmath2 is highlighted .
the scales between @xmath32 and @xmath33 are best described by chiral perturbation theory . neglecting @xmath34 corrections @xmath35,\\ b_{b_q } & = & b \left[1 + \delta b_q \right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath36 and @xmath37 contain the logarithms and
are given in ref .
the expressions for @xmath36 and @xmath37 yield @xmath38 @xmath39 and @xmath40 are low - energy constants describing dynamics at scales @xmath41 , @xmath42 is the pion decay constant and @xmath43 is the @xmath44 coupling .
this has recently been determined by cleo from a measurement of the @xmath45 width .
they find @xmath46 @xcite and by heavy quark symmetry , @xmath47 , to a good approximation .
thus , while the effect of the chiral log in @xmath48 is small , since @xmath49 , it may be significant for @xmath50 , where @xmath51 .
therefore , we refine our discussion and consider @xmath52 .
further details of the chiral log in @xmath48 and the effect of varying @xmath43 are in ref . @xcite . to study the light quark mass dependence of @xmath53 , eq .
( [ eq : xifchi ] ) is rewritten using the gell - mann okubo relations , as @xmath54\right\ } , \label{eq : xifr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath55 and @xmath56 .
\label{eq : chilog}\end{aligned}\ ] ] fig .
[ fig : chi ] shows the function @xmath57 which contains the chiral logarithms .
= 7.5 cm typical lattice calculations are performed at @xmath58 and extrapolated to @xmath59 , corresponding to the down quark .
[ fig : chi ] shows that the difference between a linear fit and one including chiral logarithms is easily masked by statistical error in the region where data are available .
however , the effect of the logarithms is significant at smaller @xmath60 values and is not reproduced by a linear fit . to include these logarithms in the chiral extrapolation of @xmath53 ( or @xmath61 ) the low - energy constant @xmath39
is required .
this can be extracted from current lattice data .
cancels in the total . ]
the usual , linear functional form applied to @xmath61 is @xmath62 assuming this is sensible for @xmath63 , as indicated by fig .
[ fig : chi ] , and by equating eqs .
( [ eq : xifr ] ) and ( [ eqn : xi - linear ] ) @xmath64 , \label{eq : f2s}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which plugged into eq .
( [ eq : xifr ] ) gives @xmath65 \right\}. \label{eq : xiffinal}\end{aligned}\ ] ] knowing @xmath43 from experiment and @xmath66 from lattice calculations gives a new handle on @xmath53 .
to evaluate @xmath67 , @xmath68 mev , @xmath69 and @xmath70 @xcite are used .
the parameter @xmath71 is a remaining uncertainty .
[ fig : xi - r0 ] shows the dependence of @xmath53 on @xmath71 .
= 7.5 cm fig .
[ fig : xi - r0 ] yields a value of @xmath72 .
the conservative error attached to @xmath66 leads to the larger then usual error on @xmath53 .
a similar analysis of @xmath73 is described in ref .
@xcite , giving @xmath74 .
the combination leads to @xmath75
the importance of reliable chiral extrapolations has become more and more widely appreciated @xcite .
this is especially true in the quenched approximation where many other systematic errors have been controlled , leaving chiral extrapolation as the major uncertainty @xcite . to date , most lattice calculations of @xmath2 have relied on linear ( or quadratic ) fits .
a combination of the new cleo value of the coupling with lattice data for @xmath39 allows a determination of @xmath2 incorporating chiral logarithm effects . reducing the uncertainty in @xmath2 is possible by designing lattice calculations to determine the low - energy constants .
99 f. ronga ( belle collaboration ) and c. voena ( babar collaboration ) .
talks at ichep02 , amsterdam , july 2002 .
[ http://www.ichep02.nl/ ] .
k. anikeev _
_ , _ @xmath76 physics at the tevatron : run ii and beyond _ , arxiv : hep - ph/0201071 , http://www - theory.lbl.gov / brun2/report/. n. yamada , these proceedings .
b. grinstein _ et al .
b 380 ( 1992 ) 369 ; s.r .
sharpe , y. zhang , phys .
d 53 ( 1996 ) 5125 ; j. l. goity , phys . rev .
d 46 ( 1992 ) 3929 .
jlqcd collaboration , nucl .
106 ( 2002 ) 397 - 399 .
s. ryan , nucl .
106 ( 2002 ) 86 - 97 .
a.s . kronfeld and s.m .
b 543 ( 2002 ) 59 .
arxiv : hep - ph/0206058 .
a. anastassov _
( cleo collaboration ) , phys .
d 65 ( 2002 ) 032003 .
panel discussion on chiral extrapolation of lattice observables , these proceedings .
el - khadra _ et al .
d 64 ( 2001 ) 014502 ; j. shigemitsu _
et al . _ ,
arxiv : hep - lat/0207011 . | standard model expression for @xmath1 mixing ckm element @xmath10 result compared to determinations eq delta quantities in parenthesis known @xmath11 @xcite measurement of @xmath12 percent level expected at tevetron @xcite @xmath10 dominated by qcd uncertainties in hadronic matrix element @xmath13 known to @xmath14 by lattice qcd @xcite @xmath15 computed directly parameterised as @xmath16 reconstructed from determinations @xmath17 @xmath18 approach useful light quark mass dependence discussion methodologies results percent - level accuracies of @xmath12 @xmath19 instructive form ratio @xmath20 ckm unitarity implies @xmath21 @xmath22 uncertainty on @xmath23 2 - 4% error in @xmath24 due to uncertainty @xmath25 ratio @xmath25 systemtic uncertainties cancel precise determination @xmath24 typical lattice calculations use @xmath26 masses results chirally extrapolated linear quadratic fits account chiral logarithms chiral perturbation theoryeffect logs explored by jlqcd @xcite included in error budget @xmath2 logarithms change extrapolation value @xmath2 chiral limit shift @xmath2 from to details in ref @xcite 7.5 cm fig @xmath29 @xmath30 constrain apex unitarity triangle effect shift in @xmath2 highlighted scales between @xmath32 @xmath33 described by chiral perturbation theory neglecting @xmath34 corrections @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 contain logarithms given in ref expressions yield @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 low - energy constants dynamics scales @xmath41 @xmath42 pion decay constant @xmath43 @xmath44 coupling determined by cleo from measurement @xmath45 width @xmath46 @xcite @xmath47 approximation effect chiral log in @xmath48 small significant for @xmath50 refine discussion consider @xmath52 details chiral log @xmath48 effect varying @xmath43 in ref . @xcite study light quark mass dependence of @xmath53eq : xifchi rewritten gell - mann okubo relations as @xmath54{eq : xifr}{aligned @xmath55 @xmath56{eq : chilog}{aligned fig shows function @xmath57 chiral logarithms 7.5 cm lattice calculations at @xmath58 extrapolated to @xmath59 down quark difference linear fit including chiral logarithms masked by statistical error effect logarithms significant at smaller @xmath60 values not reproduced linear fit include logarithms chiral extrapolation @xmath53 or @xmath61 low - energy constant @xmath39 required extracted from lattice data linear functional form @xmath61 is @xmath62 sensible for @xmath63 equating eqs eq : xifr : xi - linear @xmath64{eq : f2s}{aligned eq xifr gives @xmath65{eq : xiffinal}{aligned @xmath43 from experiment @xmath66 from lattice calculations new handle on @xmath53 evaluate @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xcite used parameter @xmath71 remaining uncertaintyfig xi - r0 shows dependence @xmath53 on @xmath71 7.5 cm - r0 yields value @xmath72 conservative error @xmath66 leads larger error @xmath53 similar analysis @xmath73 @xcite @xmath74 combination leads to @xmath75 importance reliable chiral extrapolations appreciated especially quenched approximation errors controlled chiral extrapolation major uncertainty lattice calculations @xmath2 linear fits new cleo value lattice data @xmath39 allows determination @xmath2 chiral logarithm effects reducing uncertainty @xmath2 designing lattice calculations low - energy constants f. ronga. voena talks ichep02 amsterdam july 2002 k. anikeev @xmath76 physics tevatron run ii beyond arxiv hep - ph/0201071 theory.lbl.gov brun2/report yamada proceedings grinstein et 380 ( 1992 ) 369 sharpe zhang phys . 53 ( 1996 ) 5125 goity phys 46 ( 1992 ) 3929 nucl . 106 ( 2002 ) 397 - 399 ryan nucl 106 2002 ) 86 - 97kronfeld 543 2002 59 hep - ph/0206058 anastassov cleo collaboration 65 2002 ) 032003 panel discussion chiral extrapolation lattice observables proceedings el - khadra 64 2001 ) 014502 shigemitsu hep - lat/0207011 | 0.307308 | 1,919 | 1,002 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,226 | the wigner function formalism which relates source size parameters to experimental `` hbt radii '' extracted from two - particle bose - einstein correlations is generalized to azimuthally deformed and longitudinally tilted sources .
it is explained how this can be used to complement anisotropic flow measurements with relevant space - time information on the source . | two - particle interferometry , which exploits the bose - einstein symmetrization effects on the production cross section for pairs of identical bosons , has become a powerful tool to extract detailed space - time information about the freeze - out configuration of the hot and dense fireballs formed in relativistic heavy - ion collisions @xcite .
recent exciting data on transverse flow anisotropies in non - central heavy - ion collisions and their interpretation as evidence for early and efficient thermalization at rhic energies @xcite have generated new interest in a better understanding of the space - time structure of the deformed sources created in these collisions .
this requires the generalization of the hbt interferometry tool from azimuthally symmetric sources ( reviewed in @xcite ) to deformed situations .
applications of this new formalism to recent rhic data are reported in the following article by m. lisa . for chaotic sources ( i.e. independent particle emission )
, the two - particle bose - einstein correlation function @xmath0 can be expressed through a fourier transform of the _ emission function _
@xmath1 which describes the single - particle phase - space distribution at freeze - out @xcite .
@xmath2 is the average momentum of the pair while @xmath3 is the relative momentum between the two particles .
the fourier transform in @xmath3 is restricted by the _ mass - shell constraint _
@xmath4 ( where @xmath5 is the pair velocity ) and therefore not fully invertible .
the extraction of the emission function @xmath1 from the measured correlation function @xmath6 thus requires additional theoretical input @xcite .
if the source is dominated by a single length scale ( its `` size '' ) , the emission function can , for every momentum @xmath2 , be approximated by a gaussian in space - time whose width parameters form a symmetric tensor , the _ spatial correlation tensor _
@xmath7({\bm{k } } ) \equiv\langle\tilde x_\mu\tilde x_\nu\rangle$ ] .
the correlation function is then also a gaussian in the relative momentum @xmath3 , @xmath8 $ ] , where @xmath9 denotes the beam direction , @xmath10 the transverse emission direction @xmath11 of the pair , and @xmath12 the third cartesian direction perpendicular to @xmath9 and @xmath10 .
the transverse emission direction @xmath2 is characterized by an azimuthal angle @xmath13 with respect to the reaction plane formed by the beam axis and the impact parameter @xmath14 . in collisions between spherical nuclei
the emission function is reflection symmetric with respect to the reaction plane .
this and other , more specific symmetries of the emission function are most easily expressed in a reaction - plane - fixed coordinate system where @xmath15 points along the beam direction , @xmath16 along the impact parameter , and @xmath17 perpendicular to the reaction plane . on the other hand ,
the correlation radii @xmath18 are more easily interpreted in the @xmath19 system because the @xmath20-dependence , being transverse to the pair velocity @xmath21 , is not affected by the mixing of space and time induced by the mass - shell constraint into the fourier transform .
the @xmath19 and @xmath22 systems are rotated with respect to each other by the azimuthal emission angle @xmath13 .
the fourier transform between the emission and correlation functions the leads to the following relations between the `` hbt radii '' @xmath18 and the components of the spatial correlation tensor @xmath23 @xcite : @xmath24 these relations display the _ explicit _ @xmath13-dependence arising from the mentioned rotation between the @xmath22 and @xmath19 systems , but hide the _ implicit _ @xmath13-dependence of the spatial correlation tensor components @xmath25 .
the total emission angle dependence of the hbt radii results from a combination of both explicit and implicit @xmath13-dependences @xcite .
the implicit @xmath13-dependence of the spatial correlation tensor is restricted by symmetries of the source @xcite .
it is a relativistic effect associated with an azimuthal spatial source deformation superimposed by strong transverse collective flow @xcite which vanishes with the @xmath26 power of the transverse flow velocity @xmath27 for weak or no collective expansion @xcite .
a full analysis of the symmetry constraints on @xmath28 for symmetric collisions between spherical nuclei and for pairs detected in a symmetric rapidity window around @xmath29 can be found in ref .
one finds the following _ most general _
form for the azimuthal oscillations of the hbt radii : @xmath30 we see that only even _ or _ odd sine _ or _ cosine terms occur , but no mixtures of such terms .
statistical errors in the resolution of the reaction plane angle as well as finite angular bin sizes in @xmath13 tend to reduce the actually measured oscillation amplitudes ; fortunately , these dilution effects can be fully corrected by a model - independent correction algorithm @xcite .
a gaussian fit to the thus corrected correlation function , binned in @xmath31 , @xmath32 and emission angle @xmath13 , then yields the `` true '' hbt radius parameters @xmath33 from which the @xmath34 order azimuthal oscillation amplitudes are extracted via @xmath35 here @xmath36 indicates the number of ( equally spaced ) @xmath13 bins in the data and @xmath37 stands for @xmath38 or @xmath39 as appropriate , see eqs.([24 ] ) .
( note that nyquist s theorem limits the number of harmonics that can be extracted to @xmath40 . )
we would like to relate the azimuthal oscillation amplitudes of the 6 hbt radius parameters to the geometric and dynamical anisotropies of the source , as reflected in the azimuthal oscillations of the 10 independent components of the spatial correlation tensor .
their allowed oscillation patterns at midrapidity @xmath29 are given by @xcite @xmath41 the missing terms in the sums over @xmath42 have amplitudes which are odd functions of @xmath31 and vanish at midrapidity .
they do , however , contribute to the hbt radii if the data are averaged over a finite , symmetric rapidity window around @xmath29 @xcite .
their contributions can be eliminated by varying the width @xmath43 of this rapidity window and extrapolating quadratically to @xmath44 .
note that @xmath45 by symmetry , i.e. the corresponding components of @xmath46 oscillate around zero .
the oscillation amplitudes of the hbt radii relate to the oscillation amplitudes of the source parameters as follows : for the odd harmonics @xmath47 we have @xmath48 whereas the even harmonics @xmath49 satisfy @xmath50 in these relations it is understood that all negative harmonic coefficients @xmath51 as well as @xmath52 and @xmath53 are zero . the angular brackets @xmath54 indicate an average over a finite , symmetric rapidity window around @xmath29 .
the terms involving the longitudinal pair velocity @xmath55 vanish quadratically as the width @xmath43 of that window shrinks to zero . even after extrapolating to @xmath29 in this way , we have still many more source parameters than measurable hbt amplitudes .
one counts easily that up to @xmath56 there are 9 measurable fourier coefficients which ( at @xmath29 ) depend on 19 source amplitudes .
from there on , increasing @xmath42 by 2 yields 6 additional measured amplitudes which depend on 10 additional source amplitudes .
this lack of analysis power is an intrinsic weakness of the hbt microscope and due to the fundamental restrictions arising from the mass - shell constraint @xmath57 .
the reconstruction of the source thus must necessarily rely on additional assumptions .
one such assumption which may not be too unreasonable is that the emission duration @xmath58 is approximately independent of emission angle and that the source is sufficiently smooth that higher order harmonics @xmath59 of @xmath46 can be neglected .
such source properties would result in the `` wiedemann sum rule '' @xcite @xmath60 which can be experimentally tested .
if verified for all @xmath32 it would provide strong support for the underlying assumptions on the source . in this case
we can measure 3 azimuthally averaged hbt radii and 5 independent oscillation amplitudes with @xmath61 , depending on 14 source parameters of which 5 can be eliminated by going to @xmath62 ( see @xcite for explicit expressions ) .
this makes the geometry of the effective source for particles with @xmath63 `` almost solvable '' @xcite , as confirmed by hydrodynamical calculations @xcite which show that at @xmath63 the effective emission region closely tracks the overall geometry of the source even if it is strongly and anisotropically expanding .
the source geometry can be completely reconstructed from hbt data if transverse flow is so weak that all implicit @xmath13-dependence ( i.e. all higher harmonics @xmath64 ) of @xmath46 can be neglected . in this case one
obtains at @xmath29 the `` geometric relations '' @xcite @xmath65 @xmath66 describes the average transverse size and @xmath67 ( which generates a second - order harmic in the transverse hbt radii ) the transverse deformation of the source .
@xmath68 generates a first - order harmonic in the @xmath69 and @xmath70 cross terms and describes a longitudinal tilt of the source away from the beam direction @xcite .
such a tilt was found in au+au collisions at the ags @xcite .
its sign yielded important information on the kinetic pion production mechanism @xcite .
azimuthally sensitive hbt interfrometry is a powerful tool for analyzing the dynamic origin and space - time manifestations of the strong anisotropic collective flow seen in single - particle spectra at rhic .
symmetries strongly constrain the azimuthal fourier series of the emission angle dependent hbt radii . this is helpful but not sufficient for a fully model independent reconstruction of the source deformations from such data . to separate temporal from geometric contributions to the hbt radii
, the source must satisfy special properties .
one can test for them experimentally , albeit not in a fully model - independent way .
hydrodynamic simulations @xcite ( which were reported at the meeting but are not included here ) show that at rhic and lhc energies emission from the source at non - zero transverse momentum is very strongly surface dominated ( `` source opacity '' ) . to obtain an unambiguous estimate of the transverse deformation of the source at freeze -
out one should study the @xmath13-oscillations of the hbt radii at very small @xmath32 .
a possible longitudinal tilt of the source away from the beam direction manifests itself through first - order harmonics in @xmath71 and @xmath71 .
the @xmath32-dependence of the oscillation patterns of the transverse hbt radius parameters can be analyzed to obtain evidence for or against a faster expansion of the source in - plane than out - of - plane due to anisotropic collective flow @xcite .
u.a . wiedemann and u. heinz ,
* 319 * , 145 ( 1999 ) ; + u. heinz and b.v .
jacak , ann . rev . nucl . part .
sci . * 49 * , 529 ( 1999 ) ; + b. tomik and u.a .
wiedemann , hep - ph/0210250 .
p. f. kolb and u. heinz , arxiv : nucl - th/0305084 .
wiedemann , phys .
c * 57 * , 266 ( 1998 ) .
u. heinz , a. hummel , m.a .
lisa and u.a .
wiedemann , phys .
c * 66 * , 044903 ( 2002 ) .
a. hummel , m.sc .
thesis , ohio state university , 2002 , unpublished .
lisa , u. heinz and u.a .
wiedemann , phys .
b * 489 * , 287 ( 2000 ) .
note that the limit @xmath72 eliminates all influence from the temporal structure of the source ; the emission duration and correlations between position and time at freeze - out must be extracted from correlation data at non - zero @xmath32 where , however , the explicit @xmath73-dependence associated with factors @xmath74 in the variances @xmath75 interferes with the implicit @xmath32-dependence in the spatial variances which result from collective expansion flow @xcite .
models for disentangling these different contributions to the @xmath32-dependence have been extensively studied for azimuthally symmetric sources @xcite , but must be generalized for azimuthally deformed sources @xcite . | two - particle interferometry bose - einstein symmetrization effects production identical bosons space time information freeze - out configuration hot fireballs heavy - ion collisions data on transverse flow anisotropies non - central ion collisions early thermalization at rhic energies interest space structure deformed sources generalization interferometry from symmetric sources to deformed situations applications to rhic data article by m. lisa for chaotic sources two - particle bose - einstein correlation function @xmath0 expressed through fourier transform of emission function @xmath1 single - particle phase - space distribution freeze - out @xmath2 average momentum pair @xmath3 relative momentum between particles fourier transform restricted by mass - shell constraint @xmath4 pair velocity not fully invertible extraction of emission function @xmath1 from correlation function @xmath6 requires additional theoretical inputsource dominated by single length scale emission function approximated by gaussian space - time width parameters form symmetric tensor spatial correlation tensor @xmath7 correlation function gaussian in relative momentum @xmath3 @xmath8 @xmath9 beam direction @xmath10 transverse emission direction @xmath12 third cartesian direction perpendicular to transverse emission direction @xmath2 azimuthal angle @xmath13 reaction plane beam axis impact parameter collisions between spherical nuclei emission function reflection symmetric reaction plane symmetries expressed in reaction - plane - fixed coordinate system @xmath15 points along beam direction @xmath16 impact parameter @xmath17 perpendicular to reaction plane correlation radii @xmath18 interpreted in @xmath19 system @xmath20-dependence transverse to pair velocity @xmath21 not affected by mixing space time mass - shell constraint @xmath19 @xmath22 systems rotated by azimuthal emission angle @xmath13fourier transform emission correlation functions leads to relations between hbt radii @xmath18 components spatial correlation tensor @xmath23 relations display explicit @xmath13-dependence from rotation @xmath22 systems hide implicit @xmath13-dependence tensor components emission angle dependence hbt radii results from explicit implicit @xmath13-dependences implicit-dependence restricted by symmetries source relativistic effect azimuthal spatial source deformation superimposed strong transverse collective flow vanishes with @xmath26 transverse flow velocity weak no collective expansion analysis symmetry constraints on @xmath28 symmetric collisions between spherical nuclei pairs symmetric rapidity window around @xmath29 in ref form azimuthal oscillations hbt radii even odd sine cosine terms occur no mixtures statistical errors in resolution reaction plane angle finite angular bin sizes @xmath13 reduce measured oscillation amplitudes corrected by model - independent correction algorithmgaussian fit correlation function @xmath31 angle @xmath13 yields hbt radius parameters @xmath33 @xmath34 azimuthal oscillation amplitudes extracted via @xmath35 @xmath36 indicates @xmath13 bins @xmath37 @xmath38 or @xmath39 nyquist s theorem limits harmonics @xmath40 azimuthal oscillation amplitudes 6 hbt radius parameters to geometric dynamical anisotropies source oscillations 10 components spatial correlation tensor oscillation patterns at midrapidity @xmath29 given by @xcite @xmath41 missing terms @xmath42 amplitudes odd @xmath31 vanish at midrapidity contribute to hbt radii if averaged over rapidity window around @xmath29 eliminated varying width @xmath43 rapidity window extrapolating to @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 oscillate around zero oscillation amplitudes hbt radii relate to source parameters odd harmonics @xmath47 @xmath48 even harmonics @xmath49 satisfy @xmath50 negative harmonic coefficients @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 are zeroangular brackets @xmath54 indicate average over finite rapidity window around @xmath29 terms longitudinal velocity @xmath55 vanish as width @xmath43 window shrinks to zero extrapolating to @xmath29 more source parameters than hbt amplitudes up to @xmath56 9 measurable fourier coefficients depend on 19 source amplitudes increasing @xmath42 by 2 yields 6 additional amplitudes on 10 source amplitudes lack of analysis power weakness of hbt microscope due to restrictions mass - shell constraint @xmath57 reconstruction additional assumptions emission duration @xmath58 independent of emission angle source smooth higher harmonics @xmath59 of @xmath46 neglected properties in wiedemann sum rule '' @xmath60 experimentally tested if verified for for assumptions measure 3 averaged hbt radii 5 independent oscillation amplitudes with @xmath61 depending on 14 source parameters 5 eliminated by @xmath62 geometry of effective source for particles with @xmath63 almost solvable confirmed by hydrodynamical calculations effective emission region tracks geometry sourcesource geometry reconstructed from hbt data if transverse flow weak @xmath13-dependence higher harmonics of @xmath46 neglected obtains at @xmath29 geometric relations @xmath65 @xmath66 average transverse size @xmath67 transverse deformation source @xmath68 first - order harmonic in @xmath69 @xmath70 longitudinal tilt source away from beam direction tilt found in au+au collisions at ags information on kinetic pion production mechanism azimuthally sensitive hbt interfrometry analyzing dynamic origin manifestations strong anisotropic collective flow in single - particle spectra at rhic constrain azimuthal fourier series of emission angle dependent hbt radii not sufficient for model independent reconstruction source deformations to separate temporal from geometric contributions source must satisfy special properties test experimentally hydrodynamic simulations show rhic emission source at non - zero transverse momentum surface dominated source opacity estimate transverse deformation at freeze - out study @xmath13-oscillations of hbt radii at small @xmath32 longitudinal tilt source beam direction manifests through harmonics in @xmath71 @xmath32-dependence oscillation patterns transverse hbt radius parameters analyzed faster expansion source in due to anisotropic collective flow wiedemann heinz 319, 145 ( 1999 ) heinz jacak 49 529 ( 1999 ) tomik wiedemann hep - ph/0210250 kolb heinz arxiv nucl - th/0305084 phys . 57 266 ( 1998 ) heinz hummel lisa wiedemann 66 044903 ( 2002 ) hummel m.sc. thesis ohio state university 2002 unpublished lisa heinz wiedemann phys . 489 287 ( 2000 ) limit @xmath72 eliminates influence from temporal structure source emission duration correlations between position time at freeze - out extracted from correlation data at non - zero @xmath32 @xmath73-dependence @xmath74 variances interferes with @xmath32-dependence in spatial variances collective expansion flowmodels disentangling contributions @xmath32-dependence studied for symmetric sources @xcite generalized for deformed sources | 0.495398 | 2,845 | 1,458 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,241 | the development , results , and prospect of the dynamical coupled - channels analysis at excited baryon analysis center ( ebac - dcc ) are reported .
address = department of physics , osaka city university , osaka 558 - 8585 , japan , altaddress = excited baryon analysis center , thomas jefferson national accelerator facility , newport new , virginia 23606 , usa address = physics division , argonne national laboratory , argonne , illinois 60439 , usa , altaddress = excited baryon analysis center , thomas jefferson national accelerator facility , newport new , virginia 23606 , usa | the excited baryon analysis center ( ebac ) at jefferson lab was established in the spring of 2006 for investigating the nucleon resonances ( @xmath0 ) . in this contribution , we report on the development , results , and prospect of ebac .
the ebac project has three components , as illustrated in fig .
[ fig : ebac - strategy ] .
the first task is to perform a dynamical coupled - channels analysis of the _ world _ data of @xmath1 to determine the meson - baryon partial - wave amplitudes .
the second step is to develop a procedure to extract the @xmath0 parameters from the determined partial - wave amplitudes .
the third step is to investigate the interpretations of the extracted @xmath0 properties in terms of the available hadron models and lattice qcd .
the ebac analysis is based on a hamiltonian formulation @xcite within which the reaction amplitudes @xmath2 in each partial - wave are calculated from the following coupled - channels integral equations , @xmath3 where @xmath4 , and @xmath5 which has @xmath6 resonant components , @xmath7 are meson - exchange interactions deduced from phenomenological lagrangian , @xmath8 describes the excitation of the nucleon to a bare @xmath0 state with a mass @xmath9 , and @xmath10 is a meson - baryon propagator .
the ebac - dcc model , defined by eqs .
( [ eq : cct ] ) and ( [ eq : ccv ] ) , satisfies two- and three - body unitarity conditions which are the most essential theoretical requirements .
compared with the approaches based on k - matrix or dispersion - relations , the ebac - dcc approach has one distinct feature that the analysis can provide information on reaction mechanisms for interpreting the extracted nucleon resonances in terms of the coupling of the bare @xmath0 states with the meson clouds generated by the meson - exchange interaction @xmath7 .
in order to determine the parameters associated with the strong - interactions parts of @xmath11 of eq .
( [ eq : ccv ] ) , the ebac - dcc model was first applied to fit the @xmath12 elastic scattering up to invariant mass @xmath13 gev . for simplicity ,
@xmath14 and @xmath15 channels were not included during this developing stage .
the electromagnetic parts of @xmath11 were then determined by fitting the data of @xmath16 and @xmath17 .
the resulting 5-channels model was then tested by comparing the predicted @xmath18 production cross sections with the data . in parallel to analyzing the data , a procedure to analytically continue eqs .
( [ eq : cct ] ) and ( [ eq : ccv ] ) to the complex energy plane was developed to extract the positions an residues of nucleon resonances . in the following , we present the sample results from these efforts . in fitting the @xmath12 elastic scattering
, we found that one or two bare @xmath0 states were needed in each partial wave .
the coupling strengths of the @xmath19 vertex interactions @xmath20 with @xmath21 were then determined in the @xmath22-fits to the data .
our results were given in ref .
@xcite .
our next step was to determine the bare @xmath23 interaction @xmath24 by fitting the @xmath25 and @xmath26 data .
we found @xcite that we were able to fit the data only up to invariant mass @xmath27 gev , mainly because we did not adjust any parameter which was already fixed in the fits to @xmath12 elastic scattering .
some of our results for total cross sections ( @xmath28 ) , differential cross sections ( @xmath29 , and photon asymmetry ( @xmath30 ) are shown in fig .
[ fig : gnpin ] .
the @xmath31-dependence of the @xmath24 vertex functions were then determined @xcite by fitting the @xmath32 and @xmath33 data up to @xmath27 gev and @xmath34 ( gev / c)@xmath35 .
here we also did not adjust any parameter which was already fixed in the fits to @xmath12 elastic scattering . in fig .
[ fig : eepin ] we show four of our fits . ) , differential cross sections ( @xmath29 , and photon asymmetry ( @xmath30 ) of @xmath36 ( upper parts ) , @xmath26 ( lower parts ) . ] defined by @xmath37 with @xmath38(e_{e'}/e_e)[|\vec q_l|/(1-\varepsilon)]$ ] .
@xmath39 and @xmath40 . ] the model constructed from fitting the data of single pion production reactions was then tested by examining the extent to which the @xmath41 and @xmath42 data can be described .
it was found @xcite that the predicted total cross sections are in excellent agreement with the data in the near threshold @xmath43 gev .
our results for @xmath44 are shown in fig .
[ fig : gnppn ] . in the higher @xmath45 region
, the predicted @xmath41 cross sections can describe to a very large extent the available data , as shown in fig .
[ fig : pnppn ] . here
the important role of the coupled - channel effects were also demonstrated .
however , the predicted @xmath46 cross sections were a factor of about 2 larger than the data while the shapes of two - particles invariant mass distributions could be described very well .
( left ) , @xmath47 ( center ) , @xmath48 ( right ) are compared with the data at @xmath49 1.4 gev . ]
are compared with the data .
the dashed - curves are obtained when the coupled - channel effects are turned off within the ebac - dcc model . ]
we follow the earlier works , as reviewed and explained in refs .
@xcite , to define that the resonances are the eigenstates of the hamiltonian with only outgoing waves of their decay channels .
one then can show that the nucleon resonance positions are the poles @xmath50 of meson - baryon scattering amplitudes calculated from eqs .
( [ eq : cct ] ) and ( [ eq : ccv ] ) on the unphysical sheets of complex-@xmath51 riemann surface
. the coupling of meson - baryon states with the resonances can be determined by the residues @xmath52 at the pole positions .
our procedures for determining @xmath50 and @xmath52 and the results were presented in refs .
@xcite . from the same bare @xmath0 state .
the results were from ref .
@xcite . ] form factors for the first three @xmath53 nucleon resonances .
solid ( dashed ) curves are their real ( imaginary ) parts.,title="fig : " ] form factors for the first three @xmath53 nucleon resonances .
solid ( dashed ) curves are their real ( imaginary ) parts.,title="fig : " ] form factors for the first three @xmath53 nucleon resonances .
solid ( dashed ) curves are their real ( imaginary ) parts.,title="fig : " ] with our analytic continuation method @xcite , we were able to analyze the dynamical origins of the nucleon resonances extracted from the ebac - dcc model .
this was done by examining how the resonance positions move as the coupled - channels effects are gradually turned off . as illustrated in fig .
[ fig : p11-traj ] for the @xmath53 states , this exercise revealed that the two poles in roper region and the next higher pole are associated with the same bare state .
the extracted residues @xmath52 are complex which is the necessary mathematical consequences of any approach based on a hamiltonian formulation . as an example , the extracted @xmath54 form factors for the three @xmath53 resonances indicated in fig . [ fig : p11-traj ] are shown in fig .
[ fig : p11-ff ] . to complete the ebac project
, we must investigate how these results can be related to the current hadron models and lattice qcd .
during the developing stage of ebac in 2006 - 2010 , the ebac - dcc model parameters were determined by analyzing separately the following data : @xmath55 @xcite , @xmath56 @xcite , @xmath57 @xcite , @xmath58 @xcite , and @xmath42 @xcite .
the very extensive data of @xmath59 and @xmath60 production were not included in the analysis . to have a high precision extraction of nucleon resonances
, it is necessary to perform a _ combined _ simultaneous coupled - channels analysis of all meson production reactions .
the combined analysis must be continued to also fit the @xmath62 data of meson electroproduction data for extracting @xmath23 form factors up to sufficiently high @xmath31 .
in addition , we should explore the interpretations of the extracted resonance parameters in terms of lattice qcd and the available hadron models , such as the dyson - schwinger - equation model and constituent quark model .
this last step is needed to complete the ebac project with conclusive results , as indicated in fig .
[ fig : ebac - strategy ] .
the authors thank to b. juli - daz , a. matsuyama , s. x. nakamura , t. sato , and n. suzuki for their collaboration at ebac .
tshl would like to thank a. w. thomas for his strong support to the development of ebac project and his many constructive discussions .
this work is supported by the u.s .
department of energy , office of nuclear physics division , under contract no .
de - ac02 - 06ch11357 , and contract no .
de - ac05 - 06or23177 under which jefferson science associates operates the jefferson lab .
this research used resources of the national energy research scientific computing center , which is supported by the office of science of the u.s .
department of energy under contract no .
de - ac02 - 05ch11231 , resources provided on `` fusion , '' a 320-node computing cluster operated by the laboratory computing resource center at argonne national laboratory , and resources of barcelona sucpercomputing center ( bsc / cns ) . | excited baryon analysis center ebac at jefferson lab established spring 2006 investigating nucleon resonances @xmath0 report on development results prospect ebac ebac project three components illustrated fig . first task dynamical coupled - channels analysis data @xmath1 meson - baryon partial - wave amplitudes second step procedure extract @xmath0 parameters from amplitudes third step investigate interpretations extracted @xmath0 properties hadron models lattice qcd analysis based on hamiltonian formulation @xcite reaction amplitudes @xmath2 partial - wave calculated from coupled - channels integral equations @xmath3 @xmath7 meson - exchange interactions @xmath8 excitation nucleon to bare @xmath0 state mass @xmath9 @xmath10 meson - baryon propagator ebac - dcc model defined satisfies two- three - body unitarity conditions essential theoretical requirements k - ebac - dcc approach information on reaction mechanisms for interpreting extracted nucleon resonances coupling bare @xmath0 states with meson clouds meson - exchange interaction @xmath7determine parameters strong - interactions parts @xmath11 ebac - dcc model applied fit @xmath12 elastic scattering up to invariant mass @xmath13 gev @xmath14 @xmath15 channels not included electromagnetic parts @xmath11 determined by fitting data @xmath16 @xmath17 5-channels model tested comparing predicted @xmath18 production cross sections with data procedure continue eqs cct ccv to complex energy plane developed extract positions residues nucleon resonances sample results fitting @xmath12 elastic scattering one or two bare @xmath0 states needed in each partial wave coupling strengths @xmath19 vertex interactions determined in @xmath22-fits data results given in ref . @xcite next step determine bare @xmath23 interaction @xmath24 by fitting @xmath25 @xmath26 data fit data only up to invariant mass @xmath27 gev adjust parameter fixed in @xmath12 elastic scattering results for total cross sections differential cross sections photon asymmetry shown in fig .@xmath31-dependence of @xmath24 vertex functions determined fitting @xmath32 @xmath33 data to @xmath27 gev @xmath34)@xmath35 adjust parameter fixed in fits to @xmath12 elastic scattering fig . four fits differential cross sections photon asymmetry @xmath30 of @xmath36 upper parts @xmath26 lower parts defined by @xmath37 with @xmath38(e @xmath39 @xmath40 model from fitting data single pion production reactions tested @xmath41 @xmath42 data predicted total cross sections agreement with data in near threshold @xmath43 gev results for @xmath44 shown in fig . higher @xmath45 region predicted @xmath41 cross sections describe available data role coupled - channel effects demonstrated predicted @xmath46 cross sections factor 2 larger than data shapes of two - particles invariant mass distributions described well @xmath47 @xmath48 compared with data at @xmath49 1.4 gev dashed - curves obtained when coupled - channel effects turned off ebac - dcc modelfollow earlier works refs @xcite define resonances eigenstates hamiltonian outgoing waves decay channels nucleon resonance positions are poles @xmath50 of meson - baryon scattering amplitudes calculated from eqs cct ccv on unphysical sheets complex-@xmath51 riemann surface coupling meson - baryon states with resonances determined by residues @xmath52 at pole positions procedures for determining @xmath50 @xmath52 results presented in refs. @xcite from same bare @xmath0 state results ref @xcite form factors for first three @xmath53 nucleon resonances solid dashed ) curves are real ( imaginary ) parts continuation method @xcite analyze dynamical origins of nucleon resonances extracted from ebac - dcc model examining resonance positions move as coupled - channels effects turned off illustrated in fig . @xmath53 states exercise revealed two poles in roper region next higher pole associated with same bare state extracted residues @xmath52 complex necessary mathematical consequences of approach hamiltonian formulationextracted @xmath54 form factors for three @xmath53 resonances in p11-traj shown in p11-ff ebac project investigate results current hadron models lattice qcd ebac 2006 - 2010 - dcc model parameters determined analyzing data @xmath55 extensive data @xmath59 @xmath60 production not included high precision extraction nucleon resonances necessary simultaneous coupled - channels analysis of meson production reactions analysis fit @xmath62 data electroproduction for extracting @xmath23 form factors up to @xmath31 explore interpretations of extracted resonance parameters in lattice qcd hadron models dyson - schwinger - equation model constituent quark model needed complete ebac project conclusive results in fig . ebac - strategy ] authors thank b. juli - daz a. matsuyama s. x. nakamura t. sato n. suzuki collaboration a. w. thomas for support work supported by u.s . department of energy office of nuclear physics division contract no . de - ac02 - 06ch11357 contract- ac05 - 06or23177 jefferson science associates jefferson lab national energy research scientific computing center supported office science u.s department energy contract. de - ac02 - 05ch11231 fusion 320-node computing cluster laboratory center argonne national laboratory barcelona sucpercomputing center | 0.351819 | 2,291 | 1,150 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,245 | we investigate the time evolution of dust properties , molecular hydrogen ( @xmath0 ) contents , and star formation histories in galaxies by using our original chemodynamical simulations .
the simulations include the formation of dust in the stellar winds of supernovae ( sne ) and asymptotic giant branch ( agb ) stars , the growth and destruction processes of dust in the interstellar medium ( ism ) , the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon ( pah ) dust in carbon - rich agb stars , the @xmath1 formation on dust grains , and the @xmath1 photo - dissociation due to far ultra - violet ( fuv ) light in a self - consistent manner .
we focus mainly on disk galaxies with the total masses ranging from @xmath2 and @xmath3 in this preliminary study .
the principle results are as follows : the star formation histories of disk galaxies can be regulated by the time evolution of interstellar dust , mainly because the formation rates of @xmath0 can be controlled by dust properties . the observed correlation between dust - to - gas - ratios ( @xmath4 ) and gas - phase oxygen abundances ( @xmath5 ) can be reproduced reasonably well in the present models .
the disks show negative radial gradients ( i.e. , larger in inner regions ) of @xmath1 fraction ( @xmath6 ) , pah - to - dust mass ratio ( @xmath7 ) , @xmath4 , and @xmath8 and these gradients evolve with time .
the surface - mass densities of dust ( @xmath9 ) are correlated more strongly with the total surface gas densities ( @xmath10 ) than with those of @xmath1 ( @xmath11 ) .
local gaseous regions with higher @xmath4 are more likely to have higher @xmath6 in individual disks and total @xmath1 masses ( @xmath12 ) correlate well with total dust masses ( @xmath13 ) .
more massive disk galaxies are more likely to have higher @xmath4 , @xmath7 , and @xmath6 and smaller dust - to - stellar mass ratios ( @xmath14 ) .
early - type e / s0 galaxies formed by major galaxy merging can have lower @xmath15 than isolated late - type disk galaxies .
we also compare between galactic star formation histories in the metallicity - dependent and dust - dependent star formation models and find no major differences .
based on these results , we discuss the roles of dust in chemical and dynamical evolution of galaxies .
[ firstpage ] ism : dust , extinction galaxies : ism galaxies : evolution infrared : galaxies stars : formation | one of the many important roles of interstellar dust in galaxies is the formation of molecular hydrogen ( @xmath0 ) on its surface ( e.g. , gould & salpeter 1963 ; hollenbach & salpeter 1971 ; cazaux & tielens 2002 ) .
giant molecular clouds ( gmcs ) composed of @xmath0 are the major formation sites of stars in galaxies ( e.g. , blitz 1993 ; fukui & kawamura 2010 ) . global star formation rates of galaxies are observed to be well correlated with surface mass densities of interstellar gas ( e.g. , schmidt 1959 ; kennicutt 1998 ) .
dust can originate from stellar winds of agb stars ( e.g. , ferrarotti & gail 2006 ; zhukovska et al . 2008 ) and supernovae ( e.g. , kozasa et al . 1991 ; nozawa et al .
2003 ) , and therefore the production rate of dust in a galaxy can be determined by the star formation history that controls the formation rates of agb stars and supernovae .
thus , the evolution processes of dust , gas , and stars are mutually related , and detailed investigation of these coevolution processes can lead us to the better understanding of galaxy formation and evolution .
recent observational studies by infrared space telescopes have revealed physical properties of dust , their spatial distributions , and their correlations with their host galaxy properties in nearby and distant galaxies ( e.g. , draine et al .
2007 ; meixner et al .
2010 ; roman - duval et al . 2010
; takagi et al . 2010 ; dunne et al . 2011 ; kaneda et al . 2011 ; cortese et al . 2012 ; skibba et al . 2012 ; smith et al . 2012 ) .
for example , draine et al . ( 2007 ) have investigated the total dust mass , the mass fraction of the dust contributed by pahs , and the correlation between gas - phase oxygen abundance ( @xmath8=12 + log(o / h ) ) and the dust - to - gas ratio ( @xmath4 ) for 65 nearby galaxies and found that the average pah fraction in galaxies with @xmath16 is 3.55% .
smith et al .
( 2012 ) have found a significant difference in the dust - to - stellar - mass ratio between late - type spirals and s0s and thus provided a new clue to the origin of s0s .
meixner et al . ( 2010 ) and skibba et al . (
2012 ) have derived the detailed 2d maps of @xmath4 , dust temperature , and pah fraction in the large magellanic cloud ( lmc ) .
recent multi - wavelength observational studies of nearby galaxies have investigated physical correlations between surface densities of star formation ( @xmath17 ) , neutral hydrogen ( h i ; @xmath18 ) , and @xmath0 ( @xmath11 ) and discussed key parameters that control global star formation in galaxies ( e.g. , bigiel et al . 2008
; leroy et al . 2008 ) .
these observation have also provided data sets for radial gradients of h i and @xmath0 gas , which are quite useful for discussing what can determine the h i and @xmath0 gas mass fractions in galaxies .
high - resolution observational studies of gmcs for galaxies in the local group ( e.g. , lmc and m33 ) have provided vital clues to how individual gmcs composed of @xmath0 form from local h i and how star formation proceeds within gmcs ( e.g. , rosolowsky et al .
2003 ; kawamura et al .
a number of recent observational studies have investigated correlations between properties of dust ( e.g. , @xmath4 and @xmath9 ) and gas ( e.g. , chemical abundances and @xmath11 ) in galaxies ( e.g. , leroy et al .
2011 ) .
these observational results have raised the following three key questions on the origin of dust and gas in galaxies .
the first is what physical processes are responsible for the observed spatial variation of dust properties within galaxies ( e.g. , radial variation of @xmath4 and pah - dust mass fraction ; meixner et al .
the majority of previous theoretical studies of dust formation and evolution in galaxies are based on one - zone ( or multi - zone ) chemical evolution models ( e.g. , dwek 1998 , d98 ; lisenfeld & ferrara 1998 ; hirashita 1999 ; edmunds 2001 ; calura et al .
2008 ; piovan et al . 2011 ) .
although such previous models provided theoretical explanations for a number of key observational results on dust properties in galaxies ( e.g. , @xmath19 relation ) , they did not allow astronomers to discuss the spatial distributions of dust properties and their correlations with other galaxy properties ( e.g. , hubble morphological types ) .
therefore , it is largely unclear in these previous studies what physical mechanisms are responsible for the observed spatial distributions of dust properties in galaxies .
the second question pertains to the determinant factors for @xmath0 properties and their correlations with galaxy properties ( e.g. , luminosities and metallicities ) .
previously , elmegreen ( 1993 ) theoretically discussed the importance of the pressure and radiation field of the interstellar medium in the transition from h to @xmath0 in galaxies .
blitz & rosolowsky ( 2004 ) also investigated the importance of gas pressure in @xmath20 transition based on observational data from nearby 28 galaxies .
recent numerical simulations have incorporated the @xmath0 formation process from h i ( e.g. , pelupessy et al .
2006 , p06 ; robertson & kravtsov 2008 , rk08 ; gnedin et al . 2009 ; christensen et al . 2012 ) , which means that theoretical studies will soon contribute to the solution of the above problem .
the @xmath0 formation model dependent only on gaseous metallicities and densities proposed by krumholz , mckee & tumlinson ( 2009 , kmt09 ) is practically useful for investigating @xmath0 formation and star formation from @xmath0 in galaxies and thus used in recent semi - analytic models ( e.g. , fu et al . 2010 ; lagos et al .
2012 ) and numerical simulations ( kuhlen et al .
2012 , k12 ) .
however , these recent @xmath0 formation models assume that dust abundances are linearly proportional to metallicities ( i.e. , dust - to - metal ratio , @xmath21 , is constant ) , which is inconsistent with observations ( e.g. , galamex et al .
2011 ) which show a large dispersion in @xmath4 for a given @xmath8 ( i.e. , significantly different @xmath21 ) .
furthermore , such an assumption of constant @xmath21 is incompatible with dust evolution models that predict significant @xmath21 evolution with time in galaxies ( e.g. , inoue 2003 ; calura et al .
thus we need to improve @xmath0 formation models by incorporating dust formation and evolution in order to discuss the second question in a more quantitative manner . [ cols= " < , < , < " , ] in the present study , @xmath1 formation on dust grains and @xmath1 destruction by isrf
are estimated for each sph particle at a given time step by using the smoothing length ( @xmath22 ) and the gravitational softening length ( @xmath23 ) .
for example , we estimate the column density of h i gas ( which is necessary to estimate @xmath1 formation ) as follows : @xmath24 where @xmath25 is set to be 1 in all models described in the main text .
accordingly we need to demonstrate that the present results do not depend on the resolution of simulations ( i.e. , @xmath25 ) .
isrf for a gas particle is estimated for the local volume @xmath26 that is defined as ; @xmath27 where @xmath23 is the gravitational softening length for the gas particle and @xmath28 is set to be 1 for all models described in the main text .
such local estimation of isrf implies that stellar radiation from stars that are located outside @xmath23 ( for @xmath29 ) is completely ignored .
although , the radiation density would not change significantly even if a larger volume is used , we need to demonstrate that the present results do not depend on @xmath28 .
hopkins et al .
( 2011 ) have discussed a similar resolution problem related to the estimation of the total amount of radiation from massive stars in their simulations .
also , the present results could possibly depend on the maximum time step width ( @xmath30 ) , though timescales of key physical processes ( e.g. , @xmath31 ) are much longer than the adopted @xmath30 for models described in the main text .
we thus investigate the models in which model parameters are the same as those adopted in the fiducial model except @xmath25 , @xmath28 , and @xmath30 .
the parameter values for these test models ( t1@xmath32t6 as well as the fiducial model ) are summarized in table a1 .
key results on the time evolution of @xmath4 and @xmath6 , which are shown in fig .
a1 , are summarized as follows .
first , the time evolution and final values of @xmath4 and @xmath6 do not depend on @xmath25 for @xmath33 .
this result means that the present results are insensitive to the method to estimate column densities of neutral and molecular hydrogen .
second , the final @xmath6 value in the model with @xmath34 myr ( a finer time step width ) is 34% larger than that in the fiducial model , though there are no significant differences in @xmath4 between the two .
the final @xmath6 in the model with @xmath35 myr is 25% smaller than that in the fiducial model .
gas densities can become higher in the model with smaller @xmath30 so that the probability of conversion from neutral to molecular hydrogen can become higher . as a result of this
, @xmath6 can become larger .
the derived dependences of @xmath6 on @xmath30 imply that @xmath6 can be better predicted by using models with smaller @xmath30 .
however , a larger amount of calculation time is required for completing numerical simulations with smaller @xmath30 .
thus , if one has a limited amount of allocated time for performing numerical simulations ( on gpu clusters or supercomputers ) , one would need to compromise on the accuracy of the predicted @xmath6 .
a1 also shows that the final @xmath6 and @xmath4 do not depend so strongly on @xmath28 : @xmath6 is slightly higher in the models with larger @xmath28 , probably because isrf ( i.e. , radiation density ) can be somewhat weaker for a larger volume ( i.e. , more efficient @xmath6 formation due to weaker isrf ) .
these results imply that the present results are not so sensitive to the adopted method to estimate isrf ( i.e. , non - inclusion of the contribution of distant stellar particles to isrf ) .
b1 shows the time evolution of sfrs in the low - mass model with @xmath36 for the @xmath37 and @xmath38dependent sf recipes .
although the fiducial model shows only slight differences in sfrs between the two different sf recipes , this model shows more remarkable differences in the early sf histories .
the model with the @xmath37dependent sf shows systematically higher sfr for @xmath39 gyr in comparison with that with the @xmath38dependent sf . this suppression of sf in early phase of the disk formation in the @xmath1-dependent sf model is due largely to the lower @xmath1 fraction in the low - mass disk model .
such suppression can be seen in other low - mass models with the @xmath38dependent sf recipe ( @xmath40 ) .
these results imply that the adoption of @xmath38dependent sf recipe is important for sf histories of low - mass disk galaxies .
severe suppression of sf has been already reported by k12 in which @xmath0-regulated sf models are adopted .
in the present model , @xmath1 formation efficiencies depend strongly on dust abundances ( @xmath4 ) .
therefore , it is expected that more massive galaxies , where chemical enrichment proceeds more efficiently , can have larger @xmath4 and thus larger @xmath6 .
c1 shows the time evolution of @xmath4 and @xmath6 in the low - mass disk model with @xmath36 and the high - mass one with @xmath41 . clearly , both final @xmath4 and @xmath6 are higher in the high - mass model , and the evolution of @xmath6 is more rapid in the high - mass model . in the present @xmath1 formation model ,
the final @xmath6 in disks with @xmath40 can be very low ( @xmath42 ) , which has important implications of gas contents in dwarf galaxies .
we will discuss such implications in detail in our forthcoming papers . | interstellar dust in galaxies formation of molecular hydrogen ( @xmath0 ) on surface gould salpeter 1963 hollenbach 1971 cazaux tielens 2002 giant molecular clouds of @xmath0 are major formation sites of stars in blitz 1993 fukui kawamura 2010 global star formation rates correlated with surface mass densities interstellar gas schmidt 1959 kennicutt 1998 dust from stellar winds of agb stars ferrarotti 2006 and supernovae nozawa 2003 production rate of dust in galaxy determined by star formation history formation rates agb stars supernovae evolution processes of dust gas stars mutually related detailed investigation of coevolution to understanding of galaxy formation and evolution studies by infrared space telescopes revealed physical properties of dust spatial distributions correlations with host galaxy properties in galaxies draine 2007 meixner 2010 roman - duval takagi dunne 2011 kaneda cortese 2012 skibba smith 2012 draine2007 ) investigated total dust mass mass fraction pahs correlation between gas - phase oxygen abundance @xmath8=12 + log(o h dust - to - gas ratio @xmath4 for 65 nearby galaxies average pah fraction in galaxies @xmath16 3.55% smith et al 2012 found significant difference in dust - to - stellar - mass ratio between late - type spirals s0s new clue to origin s0s meixner 2010 skibba 2012 derived detailed 2d maps of @xmath4 dust temperature pah fraction in large magellanic cloud lmc ) recent studies investigated correlations between surface densities star formation @xmath17 neutral hydrogen @xmath0 discussed parameters global star formation provided data sets for radial gradients of h i @xmath0 gas useful discussing mass fractions high - resolution studies of gmcs for galaxies local group lmc m33 provided clues to gmcs @xmath0 form local h i star formation recent studies investigated correlations between properties dust @xmath4 @xmath9 gaschemical abundances @xmath11 in galaxies leroy et al . 2011 observational results raised three questions on origin of dust gas in galaxies first physical processes for spatial variation of dust properties radial variation @xmath4 - dust mass fraction previous theoretical studies of dust formation evolution based on one - zone chemical evolution models dwek 1998 lisenfeld ferrara 1998 hirashita 1999 edmunds 2001 calura 2008 piovan 2011 models provided explanations for results dust @xmath19 relation discuss spatial distributions dust correlations with galaxy properties unclear physical mechanisms for spatial distributions dust second question determinant factors for @xmath0 properties correlations with galaxy properties luminosities metallicities elmegreen 1993 discussed importance of pressure radiation field interstellar medium in transition from h to @xmath0 galaxies blitz & rosolowsky 2004 investigated importance gas pressure in @xmath20 transition 28 galaxies recent numerical simulations incorporated @xmath0 formation process from h i pelupessy 2006 robertson kravtsov 2008 gnedin2009 christensen 2012 theoretical studies contribute to solution problem @xmath0 formation model dependent on gaseous metallicities densities by krumholz mckee tumlinson 2009 useful for @xmath0 formation star formation in galaxies used in semi - analytic models fu 2010 lagos 2012 numerical simulations kuhlen 2012 models assume dust abundances linearly proportional to metallicities dust - to - metal ratio @xmath21 constant inconsistent with observations galamex 2011 large dispersion in @xmath4 for @xmath8 different @xmath21 assumption of constant @xmath21 incompatible with dust evolution models significant evolution with time need to improve @xmath0 formation models incorporating dust formation evolution second question present study @xmath1 formation on dust grains @xmath1 destruction by isrf estimated for each sph particle time step smoothing length @xmath22 gravitational softening length @xmath23 ) estimate column density of h i gas necessary to estimate @xmath1 formation @xmath24 @xmath25 set to 1 in all modelsdemonstrate present results depend on resolution simulations @xmath25 ) isrf for gas particle estimated for local volume @xmath26 defined @xmath27 @xmath23 gravitational softening length @xmath28 set 1 for all models local estimation of isrf implies stellar radiation from stars outside @xmath23 ignored radiation density change larger volume demonstrate results depend on @xmath28 hopkins et al . 2011 discussed similar resolution problem estimation total radiation from massive stars results could depend on maximum time step width ( @xmath30 ) timescales of key physical processes @xmath31 longer than @xmath30 models investigate models parameters same as fiducial model except @xmath25 @xmath28 @xmath30 parameter values for test models summarized in table a1 key results on time evolution of @xmath4 @xmath6 shown in fig . a1 time evolution final values depend on @xmath25 for @xmath33 present results insensitive to method estimate column densities of neutral molecular hydrogenfinal @xmath6 value in model with @xmath34 myr 34% larger fiducial model no significant differences in @xmath4 final @xmath6 in model with @xmath35 myr 25% smaller gas densities higher with smaller @xmath30 probability conversion from neutral to molecular hydrogen higher @xmath6 larger dependences @xmath6 on @xmath30 imply better predicted smaller @xmath30 larger calculation time required for simulations limited time compromise on accuracy @xmath6 final @xmath6 and @xmath4 depend strongly on @xmath28 @xmath6 slightly higher in models with larger @xmath28 isrf radiation density weaker for larger volume more efficient @xmath6 formation results imply present results not sensitive to adopted method isrf - contribution distant stellar particles b1 shows time evolution of sfrs in low - mass model with @xmath36 for @xmath37 and @xmath38dependent sf recipes fiducial model shows slight differences in sfrs between recipes this model shows remarkable differences in early sf historiesmodel @xmath37dependent sf shows higher sfr @xmath39 gyr @xmath38dependent sf suppression sf early disk formation due to lower @xmath1 fraction low - mass disk model suppression other low - mass models @xmath38dependent sf recipe adoption @xmath38dependent sf recipe important for sf histories low - mass disk galaxies severe suppression sf reported by k12 @xmath0-regulated sf models present model @xmath1 formation efficiencies depend on dust abundances @xmath4 massive galaxies larger @xmath4 @xmath6 c1 shows evolution @xmath4 @xmath6 low - mass disk model @xmath36 high - mass @xmath41 final @xmath4 @xmath6 higher high - mass model evolution rapid present @xmath1 formation model final @xmath6 disks @xmath40 low @xmath42 ) implications gas contents in dwarf galaxies forthcoming papers | 0.436378 | 2,934 | 1,497 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,279 | resonance yields and spectra from elementary p+p and au+au collisions at @xmath0 200 gev from the star experiment at rhic are presented and discussed in terms of chemical and thermal freeze - out conditions .
thermal models do not adequately describe the yields of the resonance production in central au+au collisions .
the approach to include elastic hadronic interactions between chemical freeze - out and thermal freeze - out suggests a time of @xmath15 fm / c . | short - lived resonances and their decay products may interact strongly with the hadrons from the fireball medium from the time of chemical freeze - out until the system breaks up at kinetic freeze - out . in order to try to understand the evolution and expansion of this hot and dense medium we compare particle resonance yields and spectra from elementary p+p and heavy ion collisions .
the observed decrease of the strange resonance to non - resonance particle ratio in au+au collisions compared to p+p collisions suggests that medium effects are indeed present in heavy ion collisions .
these ratios , along with a knowledge of the resonance lifetime and interaction cross - sections , allow us to place limits on the chemical freeze - out temperature and the duration of the hadronic interactions in these collisions .
the k(892 ) , @xmath2(1385 ) and @xmath3(1520 ) resonances are reconstructed by measuring their decay daughters with the star _ time projection chamber _ ( tpc ) . charged decay particles are identified via energy loss ( _ de / dx _ ) and their measured momenta ( k(892)@xmath4k + @xmath5 and @xmath3(1520)@xmath4p + k ) .
the neutral strong decays such as @xmath3s from a @xmath2(1385 ) decay are reconstructed via topological analysis ( @xmath3(@xmath4p+@xmath5 ) + @xmath5 ) .
the resonance signal is obtained by the invariant mass reconstruction of each daughter combination and subtraction of the combinatorial background calculated by mixed event or like - sign techniques ( figure [ sigmapp ] ) @xcite .
the resonance ratios , spectra and yields are measured at mid - rapidity .
the central trigger selection for au+au collisions takes the 5% of most central inelastic interactions .
the setup for the proton+proton interaction is a minimum bias trigger .
the integrated invariant mass spectrum at mid - rapidity in p+p collisions after background subtraction are shown in figure [ sigmapp ] for @xmath3(1520 ) and @xmath2(1385)@xmath6 @xcite .
the mass and width are in agreement with the values from the pdg @xcite , once the expected contributions of the momentum resolution and detector acceptance are included . 200 gev after mixed - event background subtraction for @xmath3(1520 ) @xmath4 p+@xmath7 ( left panel ) and @xmath2(1385 ) @xmath4 @xmath3+@xmath5 ( right panel ) .
the @xmath8 and the @xmath2(1385 ) share the same decay channel .
hence we also observe a strong @xmath8 peak in the @xmath3+@xmath5 decay channel.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] 200 gev after mixed - event background subtraction for @xmath3(1520 ) @xmath4 p+@xmath7 ( left panel ) and @xmath2(1385 ) @xmath4 @xmath3+@xmath5 ( right panel ) .
the @xmath8 and the @xmath2(1385 ) share the same decay channel .
hence we also observe a strong @xmath8 peak in the @xmath3+@xmath5 decay channel.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] the transverse momentum distributions of k(892 ) @xcite , @xmath2(1385 ) @xcite and @xmath3(1520 ) from p+p collisions are shown in figure [ ptpp ] .
the inverse slope parameter , t , and the mean transverse momentum , @xmath9 , are obtained by an exponential fit ( see table below ) .
the transverse momentum coverage for the resonance yields is approximately 80 - 95% .
the mean transverse momentum as a function of mass in figure [ part ] ( left panel ) shows a mass dependence for stable ( circles ) and resonance ( squares ) particles .
a fit to the isr data shown by the curve includes @xmath5 , k and p from p+p collisions at @xmath1026 gev @xcite and predicts a much less pronounced mass dependence in good agreement with the @xmath5 , k and p data from @xmath10200 gev .
the resonances with mass higher than 1 gev / c@xmath11 and the @xmath8 indicate a stronger @xmath12p@xmath13@xmath14 dependence which is not represented by the fit to the isr data . .t and @xmath15 for resonances in p+p interactions . [
cols="<,<,<",options="header " , ] [ resotable ] distributions for k(892 ) @xcite , @xmath2(1385 ) and @xmath3(1520 ) for p+p collisions . the errors for k(892 ) and @xmath3(1520 ) are statistical error only for the @xmath2(1385 ) the systematic errors are included .
the systematic errors are 10 - 15%.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] distributions for k(892 ) @xcite , @xmath2(1385 ) and @xmath3(1520 ) for p+p collisions . the errors for k(892 ) and @xmath3(1520 ) are statistical error only for the @xmath2(1385 ) the systematic errors are included .
the systematic errors are 10 - 15%.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] distributions for k(892 ) @xcite , @xmath2(1385 ) and @xmath3(1520 ) for p+p collisions .
the errors for k(892 ) and @xmath3(1520 ) are statistical error only for the @xmath2(1385 ) the systematic errors are included .
the systematic errors are 10 - 15%.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] p@xmath13@xmath14 as a function of particle mass in p+p collisions at @xmath10200 gev .
the black curve is a fit to measured isr p+p data ( @xmath5 , k and p ) a collision energy of @xmath1026 gev @xcite .
right : resonance / non - resonance ratios of @xmath16/k@xmath17 @xcite , @xmath18/p @xcite , @xmath19 @xcite , k(892)/k@xmath17 @xcite and @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 @xcite for p+p and au+au collisions at @xmath0 200 gev .
the ratios are normalized to the k*(892)/k@xmath17 p+p ratio .
statistical and systematic errors are included.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] p@xmath13@xmath14 as a function of particle mass in p+p collisions at @xmath10200 gev .
the black curve is a fit to measured isr p+p data ( @xmath5 , k and p ) a collision energy of @xmath1026 gev @xcite .
right : resonance / non - resonance ratios of @xmath16/k@xmath17 @xcite , @xmath18/p @xcite , @xmath19 @xcite , k(892)/k@xmath17 @xcite and @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 @xcite for p+p and au+au collisions at @xmath0 200 gev .
the ratios are normalized to the k*(892)/k@xmath17 p+p ratio .
statistical and systematic errors are included.,scaledwidth=90.0% ]
for a comparison of resonance production in different collision systems , the resonances are divided by non - resonance particle yields to eliminate the need for a volume and energy normalization .
figure [ part ] right shows the different resonance to stable particle ratios for p+p and au+au collisions as a function of the mid - rapidity charged particle yields n@xmath20 .
all the ratios are normalized such that their p+p ratio equals that of the k(892)/k@xmath17 p+p value .
the k(892)/k@xmath17 and @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 ratios decreases from p+p to au+au collision systems .
this behavior shows that the resonance production in au+au is not a simple superposition of p+p interactions .
it is also an indication that the surrounding extended medium of a au+au collision has an influence on the resonances and/or their decay particles .
the thermal model is able to fit the ratios of the stable particles @xcite .
the results from these fits predicts @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 = 0.07 and k(892)/k@xmath17=0.32 at a chemical freeze - out temperature of t=170 mev .
the measured value for central au+au collisions at mid - rapidity are @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 = 0.034 @xmath21 0.011 @xmath21 0.013 and k(892)/k@xmath17 = 0.19 @xmath21 0.05 , significantly lower than the thermal model predictions .
a thermal description of these measured ratios would lead to a 30 - 50 mev smaller chemical freeze - out temperature .
in - medium effects such as elastic interactions of the decay particles with other particles in the created medium ( mostly pions ) may result in a signal loss .
regeneration will have the reverse effect .
microscopic model calculations ( urqmd @xcite ) predict @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 = 0.03 and k(892)/k@xmath17 = 0.25 ( lifetime : @xmath22 = 4 fm / c and @xmath23 = 13 fm / c ) .
meanwhile the urqmd calculation for @xmath18/p = 0.28 is compatible with the data , @xmath18/p = 0.240 @xmath21 0.037 . since the @xmath18/p ratio in au+au is nearly the same as it is for p+p collisions , either the regeneration of the signal is of the same order as the rescattering or there is no rescattering .
the @xmath18 has a short lifetime of 1.3 fm / c therefor the rescattering of the decay daughters is expected to be large . due to the long life - time of the @xmath16 resonance ( 44 fm / c ) we would expect no significant signal loss by rescattering of the daughters since most of the decays happen outside of the fireball , which is in agreement with our observation .
using the measured values of k(892)/k and @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 a thermal model , including rescattering , but no regeneration , predicts the lifetime interval between chemical and kinetic freeze - out to be @xmath245 fm / c .
the decrease of the @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 and k(892)/k@xmath17 ratio from p+p to au+au collisions occurs already for very peripheral collisions ( 50 - 80% ) and remains nearly constant up to the most central collisions ( 5% ) . in terms of the lifetime of the system between chemical and thermal freeze - out , @xmath25 ,
these result suggests the same @xmath25 for peripheral and central au+au collisions .
resonances are a unique tool to probe the time span @xmath25 between chemical and thermal freeze - out in heavy ion collisions .
the measured @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 and k(892)/k@xmath17 together with a thermal model and rescattering suggest a lower limit of @xmath25 @xmath245 fm / c .
furthermore , the high mass particles show a stronger mass dependence of @xmath12p@xmath13@xmath14 in p+p collisions than predicted from the stable particles below 1 gev .
99 l. gaudichet et al , .
j.phys . * g30 * ( 2004 ) 549 .
s. salur et al . , nucl - ex/0403009 .
particle data group , eur .
j. * c3 * ( 1998 ) .
h. zhang at al .
, j.phys . * g30 * ( 2004 ) 577 .
m. bourquin and j .- m .
gaillard , nucl .
b114 * ( 1976 ) 334 . j. ma et al . , j.phys . *
g30 * ( 2004 ) 543 .
h. zhang et al . , nucl - ex/0403010 .
p. fachini et al . , j.phys .
* g30 * ( 2004 ) 565 . c. markert et al .
19th winter workshop on nuclear dynamics ( 2003 ) 71 .
p. braun - munzinger , d.magestro , k. redlich and j.stachel , phys
* b518 * ( 2001 ) 41 .
m. bleicher and j. aichelin , _ phys .
lett . _ * b530 * ( 2002 ) 81 , hep - ph/0201123 .
m. bleicher and h. stcker , j.phys .
* g30 * ( 2004 ) 111 , private communication .
j. ma et al . , j.phys .
* g30 * ( 2004 ) 543 . c. markert , g. torrieri , j. rafelski , campos do jordao 2002 , new states of matter in hadronic interactions 533 , hep - ph/0206260 . g. torrieri and j. rafelski , _ phys .
* b509 * ( 2001 ) 239 - 245 , _ j.phys . _
* g28 * ( 2002 ) 1911 - 1920 . | resonances decay products interact with hadrons fireball medium chemical freeze until system kinetic freeze - out understand evolution expansion medium compare particle resonance yields spectra from p+p heavy ion collisions decrease strange resonance to non - resonance particle ratio in au+au collisions suggests medium effects present in heavy ion collisions ratios resonance lifetime interaction cross - sections limits on chemical freeze - out temperature duration hadronic interactions k(892 ) @xmath2(1385 @xmath3(1520 ) resonances reconstructed by measuring decay daughters with star time projection chamber charged decay particles identified via energy loss measured momenta neutral strong decays reconstructed via topological analysis resonance signal obtained by invariant mass reconstruction daughter combination subtraction combinatorial background calculated by techniques resonance ratios spectra yields measured at mid - rapidity central trigger selection for au+au collisions takes 5% of central inelastic interactions proton+proton interaction is minimum bias triggerintegrated invariant mass spectrum at mid - rapidity in p+p collisions after subtraction shown in figure for @xmath3(1520 ) @xmath2(1385) @xcite mass width agreement with values pdg @xcite contributions momentum resolution detector acceptance included 200 gev after mixed - event background subtraction for @xmath3(1520 @xmath2(1385 share same decay channel strong @xmath8 peak in @xmath3+@xmath5 decay channel 200 gev after for @xmath3(1520 share same decay channel strong @xmath8 peak in @xmath3+@xmath5 decay channel transverse momentum distributions of k(892 ) @xcite @xmath2(1385 ) @xmath3(1520 ) from p+p collisions shown in figure [ ptpp inverse slope parameter t mean transverse momentum obtained by exponential fit transverse momentum coverage for resonance yields approximately 80 - 95% mean transverse momentum function of mass in figure shows mass dependence for stable resonance particlesfit to isr data includes @xmath5 k p from p+p collisions at @xmath1026 gev predicts less mass dependence with @xmath5 k p data @xmath10200 gev resonances with mass higher than 1 gev /@xmath11 @xmath8 indicate stronger @xmath12p dependence not represented by fit data @xmath15 for resonances in p+p interactions distributions for k(892 ) @xcite @xmath2(1385 @xmath3(1520 ) for p+p collisions errors k(892 statistical only systematic errors included errors 10 - 15% distributions for k(892 ) p+p collisions errors k(892 statistical systematic errors included errors 10 - 15% distributions for k(892 ) @xcite @xmath2(1385 @xmath3(1520 ) p+p collisions errors(892 statistical systematic errors included errors 10 - 15%@xmath13@xmath14 function of particle mass in p+p collisions at @xmath10200 gevblack curve measured isr p+p data collision energy @xmath1026 gev @xcite resonance non - resonance ratios @xmath16 k(892)(1520) p+p au+au collisions @xmath0 200 gev ratios normalized to k*(892)/k@xmath17 p+p ratio statistical systematic errors included=100.0%@xmath13@xmath14 function particle mass p+p collisions @xmath10200 gev black curve isr p+p data collision energy @xmath1026 gev @xcite resonance non - resonance ratios @xmath16 k(892)(1520) p+p au+au collisions @xmath0 200 gev ratios normalized to k*(892)/k@xmath17 p+p ratio statistical systematic errors included=90.0% comparison resonance production collision systems resonances divided by non - resonance particle yields energy normalization figure shows resonance stable particle ratios p+p au+au collisions mid - rapidity charged particle yieldsratios normalized p+p equals k(892)/k@xmath17 k(892)/k@xmath17 @xmath3(1520)/ ratios p+p to au+au collision systems resonance production au+au not superposition p+p interactions surrounding medium resonances decay particles thermal model ratios stable particles @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 = 0.07 k(892)/k@xmath17=0.32 at chemical freeze - out temperature t=170 mev measured central au+au collisions mid - rapidity @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 = 0.034 @xmath21 0.011 0.013 k(892)/k@xmath17 = 0.19 0.05 lower than thermal model predictions ratios 30 - 50 mev smaller chemical freeze - out temperature elastic interactions decay particles signal loss regeneration microscopic model calculations predict @xmath3(1520)/@xmath3 = 0.03 k(892)/k@xmath17 = 0.25 @xmath22 @xmath23 calculation @xmath18/p = 0.28 compatible data = 0.240 @xmath21 0.037@xmath18/p ratio au+au same p+p collisions regeneration or no @xmath18 short lifetime 1.3 fm / c rescattering decay daughters large long life - time @xmath16 resonance 44 fm / c no signal loss rescattering decays outside fireball observation measured values k(892)/k @xmath3(1520) thermal model predicts lifetime interval between chemical kinetic freeze - out @xmath245 fm / c decrease @xmath3(1520) k(892)/k@xmath17 ratio from p+p to au+au collisions occurs peripheral collisions 50 - 80% ) constant central collisions ( 5% ) lifetime between chemical thermal freeze - out @xmath25 suggests same peripheral central au+au collisions resonances probe time span between chemical thermal freeze - out heavy ion collisions measured @xmath3(1520)/ k(892)/k thermal model rescattering suggest lower limit @xmath25 @xmath245 fm / c high mass particles show stronger mass dependence @xmath12p@xmath13@xmath14 in p+p collisions gaudichet.phys 2004 ) 549salur nucl - ex/0403009 particle data group c3 1998 ) zhang j.phys g30 2004 ) 577 bourquin gaillard nucl b114 1976 ) 334 ma.phys g30 2004 ) 543 zhang nucl - ex/0403010 fachini.phys g30 2004 ) markert 19th winter workshop nuclear dynamics 2003 ) 71 braun - munzinger.magestro redlich j.stachel phys b518 2001 ) 41 bleicher aichelin phys b530 2002 ) 81 hep - ph/0201123 bleicher h stcker j.phys g30 2004 ) 111 private communication ma g30 2004 ) 543 markert torrieri rafelski campos do jordao 2002 new states matter hadronic interactions 533 hep - ph/0206260 torrieri rafelski phys b509 2001 ) 239 - 245 j.phys g28 2002 ) 1911 - 1920 | 0.433748 | 3,049 | 1,527 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,283 | we analyze the escape of brownian particles over potential barriers using the fokker - planck equation in a similar way to that of chandrasekhar ( rev .
modern phys . , 1943 ) , deriving a formula for the particle deposition velocity to a surface as a function of the particle response time .
for very small particle response times , the particle deposition velocity corresponds to that obtained using a quasi - steady solution of smoluchowski s equation and for very large particle response times , the deposition velocity corresponds to that based on the transition state method ( e. wigner , trans .
faraday soc . , 1938 ) .
evaluation of the rate constant and deposition velocity for the escape of brownian particles over potential barriers michael w reeks + school of mechanical & systems engineering , + university of newcastle , uk | this short paper examines the work of chandrasekhar @xcite on the escape of brownian particles over potential barriers . it is part of a classic paper that examines a number of stochastic problems using the fokker - planck equation for brownian particles .
one of the most important results of his study has been to show under what conditions the fokker - planck equation transforms into an advection - gradient diffusion equation commonly referred to as smoluchowski s equation .
this has a significant bearing on the formula for the release rate of particles over a potential barrier for it is generally assumed that the particle flux out of the well can be obtained from a steady state solution of smoluchowski s equation .
the general formula for the rate constant for the release of particles from the potential well that chandrasekhar obtained as a solution of the fokker - planck equation , shows that the formula based on smoluchowski s equation is one extreme of the solution when the spatial gradient of the forces ( per unit mass of the particle ) is small compared with the particle response time which in many cases of interest does not apply ( see reeks et al .
the fact that chandrasekhar obtained a relatively simple formula for the most general result ( not restricted by the value of the particle response time ) is very important to the analysis we present here .
the situation analyzed by chandrasekhar is slightly different from the case we wish to consider here where particles from the bulk of the suspending fluid are subject to a potential barrier as they approach a wall where they are finally deposited .
it turns out that the analysis is exactly the same as that used by chandrasekhar , as indeed is the form for the deposition flux.what is different is the way we need to normalize the flux . in the one case
when particles are trapped in a well it is the rate constant for escape that we require by dividing the flux by the number of particles in the well whereas in the case of interest , it is the deposition velocity which means we divide the current by the concentration in the bulk or more precisely when referring to the situation in figure [ fig : potential barrier for depositing particles ] to the concentration at the bottom of the potential barrier at @xmath0 o0.5 with reference to fig ( [ fig : potential - wells ] ) we begin with the case analyzed by chandrasekhar @xcite where by brownian diffusion , particles in a 1-d potential well with minimum potential at a escape over a potential barrier of height @xmath1 at @xmath2 into the potential well at b. a complete solution can be found by solving the fokker - planck equation for the phase space distribution ( combined spatial and velocity distribution ) for brownian motion in a conservative field of force .
however whilst this can be achieved numerically at least for a 1 d potential , for the case when @xmath3 the kinetic energy of a particle per unit mass , analytical solutions can be found under certain realizable conditions .
we refer to chandrasekhar ( 1943 ) @xcite and the conditions for which the fokker - planck equation reduces to an advection gradient diffusion eq .. ( smoluchowski s eq . ) @xmath4 where : * @xmath5 is the stokes inverse particle relaxation time * @xmath6 is the particle concentration and @xmath7 the force acting on an individual particle both at position @xmath8 .
* @xmath9 is the diffusion coefficient for dispersion in velocity space , @xmath10 is boltzmann s constant and @xmath11 is the particle mass and @xmath12 the absolute temperature .
it is important to appreciate that smoluchowski s equation is only valid if we ignore any changes in time intervals @xmath13 or space intervals @xmath14 so we may consider the escape of particles from a over the potential barrier at c in terms of of quasi - steady concentration and a constant ( spatially and time independent ) advection diffusion current @xmath15 , implying from eq.[eq:-2 ] that @xmath16 if @xmath17 is independent of @xmath18 and derived from a potential @xmath19 such that @xmath20 @xmath21 + so integrating between two points @xmath22 and @xmath23 we obtain @xmath24 where we have replaced @xmath25 by @xmath26 .
now lets determine the rate constant or the probability per unit time that a particle will be escape over the potential barrier at c into potential well around b. we assume that most of the particles are in quasi equilibrium around a and the height of the potential barrier @xmath27 .
this means that to a high degree of approximation , a distribution of velocities very close to gaussian will exist in the neighborhood of a and that the concentration @xmath28 in the neighborhood of a will be given by @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the concentration of particles at a. we may assume also that @xmath31 and that referring to eq.([eq:-1 ] ) @xmath32 and so from eq.([eq:-1 ] ) @xmath33 the value of the integral will be largely based on the value of the integrand around @xmath2 where we can approximate @xmath34 to @xmath35 so @xmath36 so we have for @xmath37 @xmath38 to obtain a rate constant ( probability of a particle of escaping from the potential well in neighborhood of a into potential well at b we need to divide @xmath37 by the number of particles in the well in the neighborhood of a which we can approximate to @xmath39 so finally the rate constant for the release of particles from the potential well at a into the potential well at b is given by @xmath40
we refer to the case where smoluchowski s equation does not apply and in particular the case referring to the potential in fig ( [ fig : potential - wells ] ) when @xmath41 . in other words
the particle does not respond at all to any changes that might occur on timescales @xmath42@xmath43or and changes occur in distances @xmath44 . in terms of particles in the potential
well we may safely assume that they are in equilibrium with a concentration in the well that varies as @xmath45 and a maxwell distribution of particle velocities @xmath46 independent of @xmath47 given by @xmath48 the region beyond @xmath2 is such that a particle only responds to the force which attracts it towards b , and there is no diffusion back into a. the potential around b acts as a perfect sink for particles .
there is no fluid resistance to the particles motion and effectively the particles motion is such that immediately beyond c refers only to those particles traveling in the @xmath49 @xmath47 direction .
so we can write the current @xmath37 immediately beyond c as @xmath50 so dividing by @xmath51 in eq.([eq:-2 ] ) gives @xmath52 @xmath53 unlike the rate constant based on smoluchowski s advection diffusion equation , the rate constant @xmath52 in eq.([eq:-3 ] ) does not depend on @xmath54 .
the formula is based on what is called the transition state method @xcite .
chandrasekhar @xcite has evaluated the rate constant by solving the fokker - planck equation for brownian particles in a potential well and obtained a solution that is valid for all @xmath5 .
the solution necessarily contracts to the formulae previously derived for @xmath55 .
the same assumption is made that the height of the potential barrier at c in figure [ fig : potential - wells ] , @xmath56 .
we shall briefly outline how the formula is obtained and refer to chandrasekhar @xcite for the precise details .
the fokker - planck equation for the phase space density @xmath57 for diffusion in a conservative field of force @xmath17 is given for 1d in space by @xmath58 where @xmath59 .the equilibrium solution is @xmath60\ ] ] for which @xmath61 at a in figure [ fig : potential - wells ] and for future reference @xmath62 as chandrasekhar points out this can not be the solution for all @xmath47 because there would be no diffusion of particles over the potential barrier .
for the case we are studying where @xmath56 we would expect the solution to be close to the equilibrium solution at @xmath22 .
a solution is therefore sought of the form @xmath63\label{eq:-6}\ ] ] where @xmath64is very near unity in the neighborhood @xmath22 at @xmath65and for @xmath66 i.e. in the region of @xmath23 .
chandrasekhar points out that the most sensitive region to calculate the departure from equilibrium in the neighborhood of @xmath2 where @xmath34 has the form given in eq.([eq : potenial around c ] ) so substituting the form for @xmath67 in eq.([eq:-6 ] ) into the stationary fokker - planck equation with @xmath34 given by eq.([eq : potenial around c ] ) of the eq.([eq : fokker planck eqn ] ) gives the following equation for @xmath68 : @xmath69 where we have written @xmath70 as a function of @xmath71 and @xmath72 .
the solution of this equation satisfying the boundary conditions is @xmath73d\xi\label{eq:-7}\ ] ] where@xmath74 and @xmath75^{1/2}+\left(\beta/2\right)$ ] .
the current at @xmath2 is given by @xmath76 which substituting the form for@xmath67 based on eq.([eq:-6 ] and eq.([eq:-7 ] ) for @xmath77 ) gives @xmath78^{1/2}e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\label{eq:-8}\ ] ] using the formula in for @xmath51 in eq.([eq:-2 ] and the value @xmath79 the rate constant @xmath52 is given by @xmath80^{1/2}-\beta/2.\right\ } e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\ ] ] note that for @xmath41 , @xmath52 contract to the transition state approximation eq.[eq:-3 ] and when @xmath81 @xmath52 contracts to the advection gradient diffusion approximation eq.([eq : smoluchowski rate constant ] ) r0.5
in the previous section we considered the case where all the particles were contained in a potential well.the height of the potential barrier @xmath27 the thermal energy /unit particle mass which meant that most of the particles were located in the neighborhood of the minimum potential at a and were in thermal equilibrium .
we used the number of particles in the well as a normalizing factor in the sense that the flux of particles escaping from the well was directly proportional to the number ofparticles in the well at any instant of time .
so the ratio @xmath82 was a constant in time and defined a rate constant @xmath52 or equivalently the probability per unit time of a particle in the potential well at a of escaping over the potential barrier at c and into the potential well at b. @xmath83 is therefore typical of the lifetime of particles in the potential well around a. we want now to consider a slightly different situation depicted in figure [ fig : potential barrier for depositing particles ] corresponding to particles being deposited at a wall at @xmath23 by diffusion but having to overcome a potential barrier at c before reaching the wall .
the particles reach a from the left by brownian diffusion from a region where the external force acting on the particles is zero .
we may assume that in steady state the flux at a scales on the concentration @xmath30 so @xmath84 .
the formula for the deposition velocity @xmath85 is straight forward to obtain since it is readily obtained from the expression for @xmath37 we have obtained from the various cases we reconsidered before ( there is no need to divide by the number of particles in the well to obtain the rate constant . )
so from the expression for @xmath37 given in eq.([eq:-8 ] ) and substituting the value of @xmath2 in eq.([eq:-9 ] ) we have @xmath86^{1/2}e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\nonumber \\ & = & \omega_{c}^{-1}\left(\frac{k_{b}t}{2\pi m}\right)^{1/2}\left(\left[\left(\beta/2\right)^{2}+\omega_{c}^{2}\right]^{1/2}-\beta/2\right)e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\label{eq:-10}\end{aligned}\ ] ] so for the value of @xmath85 based on the transition state method for which ( @xmath87 we have from eq.([eq:-10 ] ) @xmath88 and for @xmath89 ( based on smoluchowski s equation ) @xmath90^{1/2}-1\right)\omega_{c}^{-1}\left(\frac{k_{b}t}{2\pi m}\right)^{1/2}e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\;\;\\ & = & \frac{\beta}{2\omega_{c}}\left[\frac{4\omega_{c}^{2}}{2\beta^{2}}\right]\left(\frac{k_{b}t}{2\pi m}\right)^{1/2}e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\\ k_{d } & = & \left(\frac{\omega_{c}}{\beta}\right)\left(\frac{k_{b}t}{2\pi m}\right)^{1/2}e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\end{aligned}\ ] ] | short paper examines work chandrasekhar @xcite on escape brownian particles over barriers part of classic paper examines stochastic problems using fokker - planck equation for brownian particles important conditions fokker - planck equation transforms into advection - gradient diffusion equation smoluchowski s equation bearing on formula for release rate particles over potential barrier assumed particle flux from steady state solution s equation general formula for rate constant for release particles from potential well chandrasekhar obtained shows formula is extreme solution when spatial gradient of forces per unit mass particle small compared with particle response time many cases not apply ( see reeks et al chandrasekhar obtained simple formula for general result not restricted by particle response time important to analysis situation analyzed chandrasekhar different from case where particles from suspending fluid subject to potential barrier wall deposited analysis same as chandrasekhar form for deposition flux different to normalize fluxparticles trapped in well rate constant escape dividing flux by number particles interest deposition velocity divide current by concentration bulk situation figure potential barrier depositing particles concentration bottom potential barrier @xmath0 o0.5 fig potential - wells case analyzed chandrasekhar @xcite brownian diffusion particles in 1-d potential well minimum escape over barrier height @xmath1 @xmath2 into potential well b complete solution solving fokker - planck equation phase space distribution brownian motion conservative field force achieved numerically 1 d potential @xmath3 kinetic energy particle per unit mass solutions under realizable conditions refer chandrasekhar 1943 ) @xcite conditions fokker - planck equation reduces to advection gradient diffusion eq .. smoluchowski s eq . @xmath4 @xmath5 inverse particle relaxation time @xmath6 particle concentration force acting on particle @xmath9 diffusion coefficient for dispersion in velocity space boltzmann s constant particle mass @xmath12 absolute temperature smoluchowski s equation valid changes in time @xmath13 or space intervals @xmath14 consider escape of particles from a over potential barrier at c quasi - steady concentration constant independent advection diffusion current @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 independent of @xmath18 derived from potential @xmath19 integrating points @xmath22 @xmath23 obtain @xmath24 replaced @xmath25 by @xmath26 determine rate constant probability per unit time particle over potential barrier at c into around b particles in quasi equilibrium around a height potential barrier @xmath27 distribution of velocities close to gaussian in neighborhood a concentration @xmath28 given by @xmath29 @xmath30 concentration particles at a assume @xmath31 @xmath32([eq:-1 ] ) @xmath33 integral based on around @xmath2 approximate @xmath34 to @xmath35 @xmath36 for @xmath37 @xmath38 rate constant probability particle escaping from a into b divide @xmath37 by number particles in approximate to @xmath39 rate constant for release particles from a into b by @xmath40 case smoluchowski s equation apply potential fig @xmath41 particle respond to changes timescales @xmath42@xmath43or changes occur in distances @xmath44 particles in potential well in equilibrium with concentration varies as @xmath45 maxwell distribution of particle velocities @xmath46 independent of @xmath47 @xmath48 region beyond @xmath2 particle responds to force towards b no diffusion back into a potential around b perfect sink for particles no fluid resistance to particles motion beyond c refers to particles traveling in @xmath49 @xmath47 direction write current @xmath37 beyond c as @xmath50 dividing by @xmath51.:-2 ) gives @xmath52 @xmath53 rate constant s diffusion equation rate constant @xmath52 depend on @xmath54formula based on transition state method @xcite chandrasekhar evaluated rate constant fokker - planck equation for brownian particles in potential well obtained solution valid for all @xmath5 solution contracts to formulae for @xmath55 assumption height of potential barrier at c in @xmath56 formula to chandrasekhar fokker - planck equation for phase space density @xmath57 for diffusion in conservative field of force @xmath17 given for 1d space by @xmath58 equilibrium solution is @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 solution for all @xmath47 no diffusion of particles over potential barrier @xmath56 solution close to equilibrium solution at @xmath22 solution sought form @xmath63:-6 @xmath64is near unity in neighborhood @xmath22 @xmath65and @xmath66 region of @xmath23 sensitive region departure from equilibrium in neighborhood @xmath2 @xmath34 has form in eq.( around c substituting form for @xmath67 into stationary fokker - planck equation with @xmath34 eq.[eq fokker planck eqn equation @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 function of @xmath71 @xmath72 solution @xmath73d\xi\label{eq:-7}@xmath74 @xmath75^{1/2}+\left(\beta/2\right)$ current @xmath2 @xmath76 form@xmath67 eq.[eq:-6:-7 @xmath77 gives @xmath78^{1/2}e^{-mq / k_{b}t}{eq:-8}\ formula @xmath51 eq.[eq:-2 ] @xmath79 rate constant @xmath52 @xmath80^{1/2}-\beta/2.\right e^{-mq / k_{b}t} @xmath41 @xmath52 contract transition state approximation.[eq:-3 ] @xmath81 @xmath52 advection gradient diffusion approximation[eq : smoluchowski rate constant r0.5 case particles in potential well height potential barrier @xmath27 thermal energy /unit particle mass particles minimum potential thermal equilibrium number of particles well normalizing factor flux particles escaping proportional to numberratio @xmath82 constant in time defined rate constant @xmath52 probability per unit time particle potential well a escaping barrier c into well b @xmath83 typical lifetime particles well around a different situation figure potential barrier depositing particles particles deposited at wall at @xmath23 by diffusion barrier at c before reaching wall particles reach a from left by brownian diffusion external force zero steady state flux a scales on concentration @xmath30 @xmath84 formula for deposition velocity @xmath85 straight forward obtained from expression @xmath37 no need to divide by number of particles well obtain rate constant expression @xmath37 eq.([eq:-8 ] substituting value @xmath2 in eq.([eq:-9 ] ) @xmath86^{1/2}e^{-mq / k_{b}t}\nonumber\omega_{c}^{-1}\left{1/2}\left\right-\right{-mq k_{b}t}{eq:-10}{aligned value of @xmath85 based transition state method @xmath87 from eq.@xmath88 @xmath89 smoluchowski s equation @xmath90{1/2}-1\omega{c}{-1}\frac{k_{b}t}{2\pi{1/2{-mq k_{b}t}\frac{\beta\omega{c}}\omega\beta{2}}{k_{b}t}{2\pi{1/2{-mq k_{b}t\frac\omega_{c}}\beta}{k_{b}t}{2\pi m}{1/2}e{-mq k_{b}t} | 0.495157 | 3,010 | 1,608 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,298 | based on a unified theoretical treatment of the 1d bogoliubov - de genes equations , the superfluidity phenomenon of the bose - einstein condensates ( bec ) loaded into trapped optical lattice is studied . within the perturbation regime ,
an all - analytical framework is presented enabling a straightforward phenomenological mapping of the collective excitation and oscillation character of a trapped bec where the available experimental configurations also fit . | harmonically trapped bose - einstein condensates ( becs ) offer a great chance to understand the macroscopic quantum phenomena such as phase coherence @xcite and matter wave diffraction @xcite .
condensates loaded in a periodic potential forming an optical lattice ( ol ) @xcite may show a rich dynamic picture of oscillations as bloch oscillations @xcite , belieav and landau damping @xcite , landau - zeeman tunneling @xcite , and the appearance of the superfluid oscillation of condensates @xcite .
although schemes of controlling the dynamics of becs have been profusely described @xcite , the underlying physics of some of these studies appears hidden under numerical analysis .
the description in terms of excited states or goldstone modes not only highlights the main cause of this behavior , but also enables the characterization of the bec dynamics in universal terms .
thus , we select a platform of the bec loaded simultaneously into a harmonic traps and an optical lattice to characterize the phenomenon of superfluidity as well as the dynamical properties and tackled the problem analytically . the purpose of this letter is to derive a perturbative treatment which allows explicit closed solutions for the phonon dispersion relation and to reveal the effect of bec configurations on the superfluidity phenomenon .
the method has undergone the test of comparison with experimental evidences with success .
systems such as the cigar - shaped trap schematically represented in the upper panel of fig .
[ fig1 ] , can be considered quasi - one - dimensional ( 1d ) confinement . within the framework of mean field theory ,
the physical characteristics of a bec loaded in such trapping profile are ruled by the time dependent nonlinear gross - pitaevskii equation ( gpe ) @xcite .
@xmath0 \left\vert \psi \right\rangle , \label{gpt}\ ] ] where @xmath1 is the self - interaction parameter , @xmath2 is the alkaline atom mass , @xmath3 represents the harmonic trap potential plus the periodic potential caused by the counter - propagating lasers with @xmath4 the laser intensity , @xmath5 its laser wavelength , and @xmath6 the frequency of the harmonic trap . for eq .
( [ gpt ] ) , it is possible to prove rigorously , the existence of ground states for any @xmath1 and @xmath7 .
moreover , the set of ground states is orbitally stable and the ground states have a gaussian - like exponential asymptotic behavior for any @xmath8 , regardless of @xmath4 value @xcite . an important consequence of this mathematical fact is the stability of those physical magnitudes , such as no explosion and no damping as function of time , which are described by operators defined in the hilbert space of the 1d gpe ( [ gpt ] ) .
this result is particularly related to the superfluidity properties , among others physical phenomena , of the harmonically confined condensates loaded in optical lattices . , oscillating around the trap bottom .
( b ) collective excitation energies @xmath9 of the first 10 modes calculated as function of dimensionless parameters @xmath10 for @xmath11 , and ( c ) as function of @xmath12 for @xmath13 and @xmath14 .
the solid ( dashed ) lines represent odd ( even ) modes . ]
the collective excitations , or so - called goldstone modes of the bec , can be obtained by applying a small deviation from the stationary solutions @xmath15 of eq .
( [ gpt ] ) , @xmath16 , \label{psi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which corresponds to linearizing the time - dependent nonlinear schdinger equation in terms of amplitudes
@xmath17 and @xmath18 , @xmath19 being the chemical potential and @xmath20 the mode or phonon frequencies @xcite . inserting @xmath21 into eq .
( [ gpt ] ) , we obtain the bogoliubov - de gennes equations @xmath22 \left [ \begin{array}{c } \left\vert u\right\rangle \\ \\ \left\vert v\right\rangle\end{array } \right ] = \hbar \omega _ { k}\left [ \begin{array}{c } \left\vert u\right\rangle \\
\\ \left\vert v\right\rangle \end{array } \right ] , \label{b2}\ ] ] where @xmath23 .
three coupled nonlinear equations for @xmath24 , @xmath25 and @xmath26 must be solved simultaneously , which incorporate the harmonic trap and the stationary optical potential . in general
, this is a very onerous task and it is not always possible to extract transparent solutions giving reliable information on the bec dynamics . if the harmonic trap potential is switched off from eqs .
( [ gpt ] ) and ( [ b2 ] ) it is possible analytically extract reliable information of the 1d condensate in a periodic potential as the bloch oscillation and stability of the solution @xcite .
this corresponds to the homogeneous case where the phonon wavevector @xmath27 is a good quantum number and the excited frequency @xmath28 is a continuous function of @xmath29 . for @xmath30
the wavevector @xmath29 is no longer a good quantum number ( inhomogeneous case ) and the system ( [ gpt ] - [ b2 ] ) provides a set of discrete excited states @xmath31 labeled by @xmath32 by assuming a weakly - interacting bose gas and not too strong laser intensities , the self - induced nonlinear interaction and the ol potential can be considered as perturbations with respect to the harmonic trap potential .
accordingly , compact solutions for @xmath19 and the spatial shape of the order parameter @xmath33 as determined by relevant parameters of the condensate are obtained @xcite .
considering the nonlinear term @xmath34 and the periodical potential @xmath35 as small terms compared to the confined harmonic trap potential strength , the solutions of the system ( [ b2 ] ) can be cast in terms of the complete set of harmonic oscillator wave functions @xmath36
@xcite : @xmath37 and @xmath38 and the coefficients @xmath39 and @xmath40 are expanded in form of series @xmath41 @xmath42 where the quantities @xmath43 and @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 * * , * * @xmath47 . using eqs .
( [ b2 ] ) we get @xmath48 \notag \\ & = & -\lambda \sum\limits_{n , i}b_{n}^{(i)}\left ( a_{n}^{(i)}\right ) \left\langle \psi _ { k}\right .
\left\vert \psi _ { 0}\right\rangle \left\langle \psi _ { 0}\right\vert \left .
\psi _ { n}\right\rangle , \label{s1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 .
taking advantage of the procedure developed in ref . and solving simultaneously the system ( [ s1 ] )
, it is possible to show that the independent phonon frequencies @xmath31 are given by @xmath53 - \notag \\ & & \frac{v_{o}}{2}\exp \left ( -\alpha ^{2}\right ) \left [ l_{k}(2\alpha ^{2})-1 \right ] - \notag \\ & & \frac{\lambda v_{o}}{\sqrt{2\pi } } \exp \left ( -\alpha ^{2}\right ) \left [ ei(\frac{\alpha ^{2}}{2})-\mathcal{c}-\ln \frac{\alpha ^{2}}{2}+\frac{\delta _ { k}(\alpha ) } { \sqrt{\pi } } \right ] + \notag \\ & & \frac{v_{o}^{2}}{4}\exp \left ( -2\alpha ^{2}\right ) \left [ chi(2\alpha ^{2})-\mathcal{c-}\ln 2\alpha ^{2}+\rho _ { k}(\alpha ) \right ] \notag \\ & & + \lambda ^{2}\left [ \frac{\gamma _ { k}}{2\pi ^{2}}+0.033106\right ] \text { , \ \ \ \ \ } k=1,2 , ... , \label{phonon}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath54 @xmath55 , @xmath56 @xmath57 , and @xmath58 are the laguerre polynomials , the gamma function , the exponential integral , the cosine hyperbolic integral , the euler s constant , respectively .
finally , @xmath59 are numbers , @xmath60 and @xmath61 being explicit functions the dimensionless parameter @xmath62 @xcite . in fig .
[ fig1 ] the analytical solutions for the frequencies @xmath31 are graphically represented for the first 10 modes .
panel ( b ) displays @xmath63 for attractive ( @xmath64 ) and repulsive ( @xmath65 ) cases at @xmath66 also in panel ( c ) the influence of the periodical potential on the phonon modes being checked for fixed values @xmath67 and @xmath68 in the first case , the collective oscillations show an almost flat dispersion as a function @xmath69 note that the mode for @xmath70 has the frequency value @xmath6 of the harmonic trap @xcite . in panel ( c ) is also seen a blue - shift renormalization of @xmath31 can be noted due to the presence of the ol .
the normalized eigenvectors @xmath71 can be cast as @xmath72 with @xmath73 @xmath74 , @xmath75 being the laguerre polynomials , @xmath76 and @xmath77 even number .
notice that the quasiparticle amplitudes @xmath78 and @xmath79 present parity inversion symmetry property , i.e. if the index @xmath80 is an even or an odd number we are in presence of two independent subspaces where the wave functions @xmath81 become symmetric ( even mode ) or antisymmetric ( odd mode ) with respect the transformation @xmath82 . according to eqs .
( [ psi ] ) and ( [ fik ] ) , for a given time @xmath83 the probability density @xmath84 of the excited states along the @xmath85 -axis shows oscillations with well defined maxima which are quenched according to the exponential behavior @xmath86 the position of the maxima and minima of the axial density @xmath87 are linked to the minima or maxima of the combined potential function @xmath88 @xmath89 .
finally , another important limit is reached when the optical lattice is turned off . in this case the standard solutions ( in a perturbative sense ) of bogoliubov - de gennes equations for the inhomogeneous case are directly obtained from eqs .
( [ phonon ] ) and ( [ fik ] ) taking @xmath90 .
, where the maximum value of the spectral power is attained .
( b ) center - of - mass position .
experimental data from ref . are represented by open squares and full circles , while by solid lines show the calculations after eqs .
( [ phonon ] ) and ( [ xo ] ) . ] to characterize the dynamics of a bec loaded in an ol we evaluated the expectation value of the center - of - mass position @xmath91
= @xmath92 with @xmath93 here , the set of eigensolutions is chosen as @xmath94 @xmath95 $ ] for @xmath96 and the coefficients \{@xmath97 are obtained under certain initial condition . in our case , we consider that , at @xmath98 , the ol is absent and condensate is located out of equilibrium at certain distance @xmath99 from the origin , i.e. the order parameter @xmath24 is centered at @xmath100 with an expectation value @xmath101 . at , @xmath102 the system may or may not be loaded into the ol periodical potential . @xmath107 $ ] is the spectral power and @xmath108 is a linear function of @xmath109 and@xmath110 with negligible contribution to @xmath91 for typical experimental setups@xmath111 in eq .
[ xo ] the condition @xmath112 is used . the spectral power contribution to these oscillations , in terms of the mode number , @xmath80 ,
exclusively dependent on the relative initial position , @xmath113 , as displayed in fig .
[ fig2 ] ( a ) . for a given initial displacement , the mode @xmath114 with maximal contribution to the @xmath115 is given by the equation @xmath116 with @xmath117 .
thus , one can see the larger the relative initial displacement , @xmath118 , the higher the main contributing modes , as shown in the inset of fig .
[ fig2 ] ( a ) , and wider their diffusion .
this has energetic implications since the mode frequencies , @xmath31 , obtained from eq .
( [ phonon ] ) are tunable with the nonlinear interaction strength and the ol parameters . without
ol the vibrational level spacing @xmath119 which make the expectation value @xmath120 @xcite .
figure [ fig2 ] ( b ) shows the superfluid oscillation for a bec of @xmath121 rb extracted from ref .
measured in a static magnetic trap with and without a 1d periodic potential , as simulated by our approach .
using eqs .
( [ phonon ] ) and ( [ xo ] ) we are able to reproduce the reported experimental center - of - mass position as function of time without using any fitting parameter .
the oscillations observed in fig . [ fig2 ] ( b ) correspond to vibrational level spacing @xmath122 of the two independent subspaces with even and odd modes that make @xmath123 oscillate with a frequency near the harmonic value @xmath124 the small frequency shift of the condensate loaded into ol , and observed in fig .
[ fig2 ] ( b ) , is directly linked to the renormalization of the atomic mass of the system moving in a periodical potential . in summary
, we presented a unified analytical description for the collective excitations ( phonon frequencies @xmath125 eq .
( [ phonon ] ) , the excited states wavefunctions @xmath126 eq .
( [ fik ] ) ) , the 1d superfluidity oscillation and the dynamics ( center - of - mass position @xmath115 eq . ( [ xo ] ) ) of bec systems loaded in an optical lattice .
this work was partially supported by alexander von humboldt foundation . c. t .-
, v. l - r . and g. e .
m. acknowledge the financial support of brazilian agencies fapesp , capes , and cnpq . m. c. chung acknowledges nsc in taiwan .
is grateful to j. m. rost for many insightful discussions and the hospitality enjoyed during his stay at the max - planck - institut fr physik komplexer systeme . in typical experiments
the values of the dimensionless parameter @xmath127 ranges between 10 and 50 ( see morsch o. and oberthaler m. , _ rev .
* 78 * , ( 2006 ) 179 ) .
this allows a simplification of the reported analytical expresions for the chemical potential @xmath19 and also for the excited frequencies @xmath31 . | harmonically trapped bose - einstein condensates ( becs offer understand quantum phenomena phase coherence matter wave diffraction condensates loaded in periodic potential forming optical lattice show dynamic picture bloch oscillations landau damping landau - zeeman tunneling superfluid oscillation schemes controlling dynamics becs described underlying physics hidden under numerical analysis description excited states goldstone modes highlights cause enables characterization bec dynamics in universal terms we select platform of bec loaded into harmonic traps optical lattice to characterize superfluidity dynamical properties problem analytically purpose to derive perturbative treatment closed solutions for phonon dispersion relation reveal effect of bec configurations on superfluidity phenomenon method undergone comparison with experimental evidences success systems cigar - shaped trap in quasi - one - dimensional confinement theory physical characteristics of bec loaded in trapping profile ruled by time dependent nonlinear gross - pitaevskii equation@xmath0\left\vert\right\rangle{gpt} @xmath1 self - interaction parameter @xmath2 alkaline atom mass @xmath3 harmonic trap potential periodic potential counter - propagating lasers @xmath4 laser intensity @xmath5 laser wavelength @xmath6 frequency harmonic trap prove existence ground states @xmath1 @xmath7 ground states orbitally stable gaussian - like exponential asymptotic behavior @xmath8 regardless @xmath4 value @xcite stability physical magnitudes no explosion no damping function time described operators hilbert space 1d gpe related to superfluidity properties harmonically confined condensates optical lattices oscillating around trap bottom collective excitation energies @xmath9 first 10 modes function of dimensionless parameters @xmath10 @xmath11 function @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 solid dashed lines represent odd ( even ) modes collective excitations goldstone modes bec obtained small deviation from stationary solutions @xmath15 eqgpt ] @xmath16 {psi}\end{aligned} linearizing time - dependent nonlinear schdinger equation amplitudes @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 chemical potential @xmath20 mode phonon frequencies inserting @xmath21 into eq obtain bogoliubov - de gennes equations @xmath22 {array\vert u\right\rangle\hbar \omega k}{b2} @xmath23 three coupled nonlinear equations @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 solved simultaneously incorporate harmonic trap stationary optical potential onerous task not always possible extract transparent solutions reliable information bec dynamics harmonic trap potential switched off from eqs possible extract reliable information 1d condensate periodic potential bloch oscillation stability of solution @xcite corresponds homogeneous case phonon wavevector @xmath27 good quantum number excited frequency @xmath28 continuous function of @xmath29 @xmath30 wavevector @xmath29 good quantum number inhomogeneous system [ gpt ] - [ b2 ] provides discrete excited states @xmath31 @xmath32 weakly - interacting bose gas not strong laser intensities self - induced nonlinear interaction ol potential perturbations harmonic trap potential compact solutions @xmath19 spatial shape order parameter @xmath33 parameters condensate obtained @xcite nonlinear term @xmath34 periodical potential @xmath35 small terms harmonic trap potential strength solutions system ( [ b2 ] ) complete harmonic oscillator wave functions @xmath36 @xcite @xmath37 @xmath38 coefficients @xmath39 @xmath40 expanded series @xmath41 @xmath42 quantities @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 eqs [ b2 ] @xmath48\notag -\lambda \sum\limits_{n{(i}\left\left\langle \psi\rangle @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 procedure refsolving system s1 ) show independent phonon frequencies @xmath31 given by @xmath53\frac{v_{o}}{2}\left -\alpha ^{2}\right )}(2\alpha ^{2})-1\frac{\lambda v_{o}}{2\pi } -\alpha ^{2}\right ){\alpha{2}})-\mathcal{c}-{\alpha{2}}{2}+{\delta k}(\alpha ){\pi\frac{v_{o}^{2}}{4}\exp -2\alpha ^{2}\right )\alpha ^{2})-\mathcal{c-} 2\alpha ^{2}+}(\alpha )\notag \lambda ^{2}\left\frac{\gamma k}}{2\pi ^{2}}+0.033106\right k=1,2 {phonon}{aligned} @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath58 are laguerre polynomials gamma function exponential integral cosine hyperbolic integral euler s constant @xmath59 numbers explicit functions dimensionless parameter @xmath62 @xcite fig analytical solutions frequencies @xmath31 represented first 10 modes panel b displays @xmath63 attractive repulsive cases @xmath66 panel influence periodical potential phonon modes fixed values @xmath67 collective oscillations show flat dispersion @xmath69 mode @xmath70 frequency value @xmath6 harmonic trap @xcite panel c blue - shift renormalization @xmath31 presence ol normalized eigenvectors @xmath71 cast @xmath72 @xmath73 laguerre polynomials @xmath76 @xmath77 even number quasiparticle amplitudes @xmath78 @xmath79 present parity inversion symmetry property index @xmath80 even or odd number two independent subspaces wave functions @xmath81 symmetric or antisymmetric odd transformation @xmath82 eqs psi fik given time @xmath83 probability density @xmath84 excited states @xmath85 -axis shows oscillations maxima quenched exponential behavior @xmath86 maxima minima axial density @xmath87 linked minima combined potential function @xmath88 @xmath89limit reached when optical lattice turned off standard solutions of bogoliubov - de gennes equations inhomogeneous case obtained from eqs @xmath90 maximum spectral power attained center - of - mass position experimental data represented by open squares full circles solid lines calculations after eqs dynamics bec loaded in ol evaluated expectation value center - of - mass position @xmath91 = @xmath92 with @xmath93 eigensolutions chosen as @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath96 coefficients@xmath97 obtained under initial condition at @xmath98 ol absent condensate out of equilibrium distance @xmath99 from origin order parameter @xmath24 centered at @xmath100 expectation value @xmath101 at @xmath102 system may be loaded into ol periodical potential @xmath107 spectral power @xmath108 linear function of @xmath109@xmath110 negligible contribution to @xmath91 for setups@xmath111 condition @xmath112 used spectral power contribution to oscillations dependent on initial position @xmath113 in fig initial displacement mode @xmath114 maximal contribution to @xmath115 by equation @xmath116 with @xmath117 larger initial displacement @xmath118 higher main contributing modes wider diffusion energetic implications mode frequencies @xmath31 from eq phonon tunable with nonlinear interaction strength ol parameters vibrational level spacing @xmath119 expectation value @xmath120 @xcite figure fig2 b shows superfluid oscillation bec @xmath121 rb ref measured static magnetic trap without 1d periodic potential simulated approach using eqs. [ phonon [ xo ] reproduce experimental center - of - mass position function time without fitting parameter oscillations correspond to vibrational level spacing @xmath122 two subspaces even odd modes @xmath123 oscillate frequency near harmonic value @xmath124 small frequency shift condensate loaded into ol linked to renormalization atomic mass system periodical potential presented unified analytical description for collective excitations phonon frequencies @xmath125 excited states wavefunctions @xmath126 1d superfluidity oscillation dynamics center - of - mass position @xmath115bec systems optical lattice work supported by alexander von humboldt foundation acknowledge financial support brazilian agencies fapesp capes cnpq. chung acknowledges nsc taiwan grateful to j. m. rost insightful discussions hospitality max - planck - institut physik komplexer systeme typical experiments values dimensionless parameter @xmath127 10 50 morsch o. oberthaler m. 78 2006 179 allows simplification analytical expresions chemical potential @xmath19 excited frequencies @xmath31 | 0.561719 | 3,471 | 1,817 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,299 | we present @xmath0-meson transverse momentum distribution as well as its elliptic flow ( @xmath1 ) measurements in au + au collisions at center - of - mass energy per nucleon pair @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 and 39 gev with the data taken from star experiment at rhic in the year 2010 .
we discuss the energy dependence of @xmath0-meson elliptic flow ( @xmath1 ) and central - to - peripheral nuclear modification factors ( @xmath3 ) .
the @xmath4 of @xmath0-mesons are compared to those from other hadron species .
the implications on partonic - hadronic phase transition are discussed . | the goals of the beam energy scan program at bnl relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) are to search for the quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) critical point as well as the phase transition boundary between partonic and hadronic phases @xcite . by systematic study of au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 5 @xmath5 200 gev
, one could access a wide region of temperature @xmath6 and baryon chemical potential @xmath7 in the qcd phase diagram . due to its small hadronic cross section
, the @xmath0-meson may decouple early from the system , which makes it an important probe to study early partonic evolution in high energy nuclear collisions @xcite . in au+au collisions at rhic with @xmath8 gev ,
the baryon - meson separation of @xmath0-mesons @xmath3 and number - of - constituent - quark ( ncq ) scaling for @xmath0-meson @xmath1 at intermediate transverse momentum ( @xmath9 ) have provided evidence for the formation of a new kind of deconfined matter with partonic collectivity @xcite .
because of the possible transition from partonic dominated phase to hadronic dominated phase , it is expected that the established paradigm for partonic degrees of freedom at top rhic energy may break at a given low collision energy . especially , the absence or reduction of collective flow and the breaking of ncq scaling for @xmath0-mesons could indicate the system in hadronic dominated phase @xcite . with the fully installed barrel time - of - flight detector ( tof ) @xcite in the year 2010 ,
the signal - to - background ratio of reconstructed @xmath0-mesons is greatly enhanced , which improves the measurement of @xmath0-meson @xmath4 significantly at lower energies . here
, we discuss the energy dependence of @xmath0-meson @xmath1 and @xmath3 in au + au collisions at @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 , and 39 gev , based on data taken from star experiment at rhic in the year 2010 .
the au+au collision events collected by the minimum bias trigger are used in this analysis .
star s time projection chamber ( tpc ) @xcite and tof @xcite are used for tracking , particle identification and event plane determination .
the events are required to have a primary z vertex ( along beam direction ) within 40 , 50 , and 50 cm of the center of the tpc for au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 , and 39 gev , respectively , to ensure nearly uniform detector acceptance .
after the event selection , we obtain about 4 million , 12 million , and 130 million au+au minimum bias triggered events at @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 , and 39 gev , respectively . for the @xmath0-meson @xmath1 analysis at 39 gev , we use the full statistics ( 130 million ) , while part of the statistics ( 16 million ) is used for spectra analysis at present .
the collision centrality is determined by the measured raw charged hadron multiplicity from the tpc within a pseudorapidity window @xmath10 0.5 @xcite . in @xmath0-meson
spectra analysis , identified charged kaons , from the tpc @xcite , are used to reconstruct the invariant mass distributions of @xmath0-mesons at each well defined @xmath9 bin . for @xmath0-meson @xmath1 analysis , additional kaon identification from tof @xcite is used to get a clean kaon identification up to @xmath11 gev/@xmath12 and hence increase the signal - to - background ratio of reconstructed @xmath0-mesons .
the background is reconstructed by a mixed event method .
raw yields of the @xmath0 mesons are determined by fitting the background subtracted invariant mass distribution with a breit - wigner function superimposed on a linear residual background function @xcite . after taking into account the detector resolution , the reconstructed @xmath0-meson masses and widths are consistent with the pdg values @xcite .
next , the corrections for reconstruction efficiency and geometrical acceptance are applied to get the corrected @xmath0-meson yields . for the @xmath0-meson @xmath1 analysis
, we use the tpc @xmath13-sub event plane method @xcite . with an @xmath13-gap between the charged particles used in the event plane reconstruction and the measured @xmath0-mesons , the non - flow effects related to the short range @xmath13-correlation
are expected to be reduced .
this is especially important when the expected @xmath1 value is small .
more details of star @xmath0-meson analysis can be found in references @xcite .
in fig . [ fig1.fig ] , we show the star preliminary @xmath0-meson @xmath9 distribution in @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 , and 39 gev au+au collisions at mid - rapidity ( @xmath14 ) .
the 0 - 10% in the plot corresponds to central collisions , while 40%-60% to peripheral collisions .
the @xmath9 spectra in the above collision centralities and energies are well described by a levy function @xcite .
transverse momentum spectra of mid - rapidity ( @xmath14 ) @xmath0-mesons produced in au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 and 39 gev ( statistical error only ) .
the dashed curves are obtained from fits to the experimental data with a levy function @xcite.,width=472 ] in fig .
[ fig2.fig ] , we present the @xmath3 of @xmath0-mesons in au+au @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 , and 39 gev collisions . the @xmath3 is defined as the ratio of particle yields in central collisions over those in peripheral ones scaled by the number of inelastic binary collisions @xmath15 , that is , @xmath16_{\textrm{central}}}{[dn/(n_{\textrm{\scriptsize{bin}}}p_{t}dp_{t})]_{\textrm{peripheral}}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath15 is determined from monte carlo glauber model calculations @xcite .
the @xmath15 are @xmath17 ( @xmath18 ) , @xmath19 ( @xmath20 ) and @xmath21 ( @xmath22 ) for 0 - 10% ( 40%-60% ) au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 , and 39 gev , respectively .
the @xmath3 will be unity if nucleus - nucleus collisions are just simple superpositions of nucleon - nucleon collisions .
deviation of these ratios from unity would imply contributions from nuclear or medium effects .
@xmath0-meson @xmath3(0 - 10%/40%-60% ) at mid - rapidity ( @xmath14 ) in au+au @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 and 39 gev collisions .
@xmath0-meson @xmath3(0 - 5%/40%-60% ) in au+au 200 gev @xcite is also plotted for comparison .
errors are statistical only .
the left grey band is the normalization error from @xmath15.,width=226 ] at @xmath2 = 200 gev au+au collisions , there is a large suppression of @xmath0 meson yields in central collisions ( 0 - 5% ) compared to peripheral collisions ( 40%-60% ) @xcite .
this could be interpreted as final - state partonic energy loss in dense matter with a high gluon density @xcite . at @xmath2
= 39 gev au+au collisions , the @xmath3(0 - 10%/40%-60% ) is consistent with unity for @xmath23 gev/@xmath12 .
this means no significant suppression in au+au 39 gev , which is quite different from au+au 200 gev case .
we note that it does not mean that there is no nuclear or medium effect , since there could be interplay between the cronin effect ( parton @xmath9 broadening due to multiple scatterings ) which enhances hadron yields at intermediate @xmath9 @xcite and parton energy loss that suppresses the yields .
however , the data may suggest a smaller parton energy loss in au+au 39 gev than that in au+au 200 gev . at 11.5 gev , the @xmath0-meson @xmath3(0 - 10%/40%-60% )
seems to be larger than 1 for @xmath23 gev/@xmath12 . in other words ,
the @xmath0-meson @xmath3 reflects the decreasing partonic effects with decreasing beam energies . in figs .
[ fig3.fig](a)-(c ) , we compare the @xmath1 of @xmath0-meson to those of proton and @xmath24 in minimum bias au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 11.5 , 39 , and 200 gev .
we use the tpc event plane for @xmath1 measurement at 200 gev @xcite , and the tpc @xmath13-sub event plane at 11.5 and 39 gev @xcite for the above particles .
one can see from fig .
[ fig3.fig](a ) that @xmath0-meson @xmath1 is close to those of proton and @xmath24 for @xmath9 below 1.5 gev/@xmath12 in au+au 200 gev collisions .
this is expected from the hydrodynamic model since the mass of @xmath0-meson is close to those of the proton and @xmath24 . for @xmath25
gev/@xmath12 , there is baryon - meson separation which could be understood by quark coalescence in deconfined matter @xcite .
( a)-(c ) : @xmath0-meson @xmath1 versus @xmath9 compared to proton and @xmath24 in minimum bias au+au collisions at 11.5 , 39 and 200 gev , respectively .
the proton and @xmath24 @xmath1 are from references @xcite .
( d ) the ratio between @xmath0-meson @xmath1 and proton @xmath1 versus @xmath9 in above energies .
the central value of @xmath26 is far below 0 for the first low @xmath9 point in au+au 11.5 gev collisions . to suppress the y - axis scale , we place the central value of this point at @xmath27 and use a down arrow to show that the real central value of this point is below 0 .
errors are statistical only.,width=472 ] in au+au 39 gev collisions , we observe the similar baryon - meson separation for @xmath25 gev/@xmath12 , indicating that there is a partonic degree of freedom in the collision system .
however , the @xmath0-meson @xmath1 at low @xmath9 is smaller than the proton and @xmath24 @xmath1 at 11.5 and 39 gev .
one can see from fig .
[ fig3.fig](d ) that the ratios between @xmath0-meson @xmath1 and proton @xmath1 show a decreasing trend with decreasing collision energy at low @xmath9 , indicating that relative to light quarks , the strange quark collectivity becomes weaker .
possible reasons could be that the strange quark are not fully thermalized in 11.5 and 39 gev au+au collisions and/or the hadronic interactions start to play an important role in driving @xmath0-meson elliptic flow .
in summary , we present star preliminary measurements on @xmath0-meson central - to - peripheral nuclear modification factor ( @xmath3 ) and elliptic flow ( @xmath1 ) in @xmath2 = 7.7 , 11.5 , and 39 gev au + au collisions .
the @xmath3 results show that there is no significant suppression of intermediate-@xmath9 @xmath0-meson yields in 0 - 10% central au+au collisions at 39 gev compared to peripheral collisions ( 40%-60% ) , indicating a smaller partonic effect in au+au 39 gev collisions than in au+au 200 gev collisions . the lack of suppression in au+au 39 gev collisions could be an interplay between cronin effect and parton energy loss .
the baryon - meson separation between @xmath0-meson and proton ( or @xmath24 ) @xmath1 at @xmath25 gev/@xmath12 supports the quark coalescence picture in au+au 39 gev collisions . at low @xmath9 ,
the @xmath0-meson @xmath1 is smaller than those of the proton and @xmath24 , thus violates the mass ordering observed in au+au 200 gev collisions .
this might be related to the thermalization of @xmath28-quarks and/or the increasing contributions from hadronic interactions to the elliptic flow with decreasing collision energies .
x. zhang thanks the support by the national natural science foundation of china ( grant nos .
10865004 , 10905029 , 11035009 , 11065005 , and 11105079 ) , by the china postdoctoral science foundation ( grant no .
20100480017 ) , and by the foundation for the authors of national excellent doctoral dissertation of p.r .
china ( fanedd ) ( no .
201021 ) .
et al . _ ,
phys . rev . *
c84 * , 031901(r ) ( 2011 ) . s. shi _
et al . _ ( star collaboration ) , nucl . phys . *
a830 * , 187c ( 2009 ) .
a. schmah _
( star collaboration ) , quark matter 2011 ; s. shi _ et al . _
( star collaboration ) , this conference .
p. huovinen _
et al . _ ,
b503 * , 58 ( 2001 ) .
d. molnar and s.a .
voloshin , phys .
lett . * 91 * , 092301 ( 2003 ) ; r.c .
hwa , c.b .
yang , phys . rev .
* c67 * , 064902 ( 2003 ) ; r.j .
et al . _ ,
* 90 * , 202303 ( 2003 ) . | goals beam energy scan program bnl heavy ion collider quantum chromodynamics critical point phase transition boundary between partonic hadronic phases study au+au collisions at @xmath2 = 5 @xmath5 200 gev temperature baryon chemical potential @xmath7 qcd phase diagram small hadronic cross section @xmath0-meson may decouple early important early partonic evolution high energy nuclear collisions au+au collisions at rhic @xmath8 gev baryon - meson separation quark scaling for intermediate transverse momentum evidence formation deconfined matter with partonic collectivity possible transition from partonic to hadronic paradigm partonic degrees freedom energy may break at low collision energy absence collective flow breaking ncq scaling-mesons indicate system hadronic dominated phase installed barrel time - of - flight detector 2010 signal - to - background ratio reconstructed @xmath0-mesons enhanced improves measurement @xmath0-meson @xmath4 at lower energiesdiscuss energy dependence @xmath0-meson collisions at @xmath2 = 7.7 11.5 39 gev data star experiment rhic 2010 collision events minimum bias trigger used star s time projection chamber tof @xcite for tracking particle identification event plane determination events primary z vertex within 40 50 50 cm of center tpc collisions 11.5 39 gev uniform detector acceptance event selection 4 million 12 million 130 million au+au minimum bias events at @xmath2 = 7.7 11.5 39 gev @xmath0-meson @xmath1 analysis at 39 gev full statistics 130 million part 16 million for spectra analysis collision centrality determined by raw charged hadron multiplicity from tpc within pseudorapidity window @xmath10 @xcite spectra analysis identified charged kaons reconstruct invariant mass distributions @xmath0-mesons @xmath9 bin additional kaon identification from tof @xcite clean kaon identification @xmath11/@xmath12 signal - to - background ratio reconstructed-mesons background reconstructed by mixed event methodyields @xmath0 mesons determined fitting background invariant mass distribution breit - wigner function linear residual background function @xcite detector resolution reconstructed-meson masses widths consistent with pdg values @xcite corrections for reconstruction efficiency geometrical acceptance applied yields-meson @xmath1 analysis tpc @xmath13-sub event plane method-gap between charged particles measured-mesons non - flow effects range-correlation important when expected @xmath1 value small details @xmath0-meson analysis in references @xcite fig preliminary @xmath0-meson @xmath9 distribution in @xmath2 = 7.7 11.5 39 gev collisions mid - rapidity 0 - 10% central collisions 40%-60% peripheral collisions @xmath9 spectra described by levy function @xcite transverse momentum spectra mid - rapidity-mesons in collisions = 7.7 11.5 39 gev statistical error only dashed curves obtained from fits experimental data levy function @xcite@xmath3 @xmath0-mesons @xmath2 = 7.7 11.5 39 gev collisions @xmath3 ratio particle yields central collisions peripheral scaled inelastic binary collisions @xmath15 @xmath15 determined monte carlo glauber model calculations 0 - 10% 40%-60% ) au+au collisions @xmath2 = 7.7 11.5 39 gev @xmath3 unity nucleus - nucleus collisions nucleon - nucleon collisions deviation ratios unity contributions nuclear medium effects @xmath0-meson @xmath3(0 - 10%/40%-60% ) mid - rapidity+au @xmath2 = 11.5 39 gev collisions-meson(0 - 5%/40%-60% ) au+au 200 gev @xcite plotted comparison errors statistical left grey band normalization error @xmath15 @xmath2 = 200 gev collisions large suppression @xmath0 meson yields central collisions 0 - 5% peripheral collisions 40%-60% )interpreted final - state partonic energy loss in dense matter high gluon density @xmath2 = 39 gev collisions @xmath3(0 - 10%/40%-60% consistent with unity for @xmath23/@xmath12 no suppression in+au 39 gev different from 200 gev no nuclear medium effect interplay between cronin effect yields parton energy loss suggest smaller parton energy loss in+au 39 gev than 200 gev at 11.5 gev @xmath0-meson @xmath3(0 - 10%/40%-60% ) larger than 1 for @xmath23 gev/@xmath12 reflects decreasing partonic effects decreasing beam energies @xmath1 to proton @xmath24 in minimum bias collisions at @xmath2 = 11.5 39 200 gev tpc event plane for @xmath1 200 gev @xmath13-sub plane at 11.5 39 gev @xmath0-meson close to proton @xmath24 for below 1.5 gev/@xmath12 in au+au 200 gev collisionsexpected hydrodynamic model mass @xmath0-meson close to proton @xmath24 @xmath25 gev/@xmath12 baryon - meson separation understood by quark coalescence matter @xcite @xmath0-meson @xmath1 versus @xmath9 compared proton @xmath24 minimum bias collisions at 11.5 39 200 gev proton @xmath24 from references @xcite ratio between @xmath0-meson proton versus @xmath9 above energies central value @xmath26 below 0 first low @xmath9 point 11.5 gev collisions central value at @xmath27 errors statistical 39 gev collisions similar baryon - meson separation for @xmath25 gev/@xmath12 partonic degree freedom collision system @xmath0-meson @xmath1 at low @xmath9 smaller than proton @xmath24 at 11.5 39 gev ratios between @xmath0-meson proton show decreasing trend collision energy at low @xmath9 quark collectivity weakerstrange quark thermalized in 11.5 39 gev collisions hadronic interactions @xmath0-meson elliptic flow present measurements on @xmath0-meson central peripheral nuclear modification factor elliptic flow in @xmath2 = 7.7 11.5 39 gev collisions results no significant suppression intermediate-@xmath9 @xmath0-meson yields in 0 - 10% central collisions at 39 gev smaller partonic effect in 39 gev collisions 200 gev collisions lack suppression interplay between cronin effect parton energy loss baryon - meson separation between @xmath0-meson proton @xmath25 gev/ supports quark coalescence in 39 gev collisions low @xmath9 @xmath0-meson @xmath1 smaller than proton @xmath24 violates mass ordering in 200 gev collisions to thermalization @xmath28-quarks increasing hadronic interactions to elliptic flow decreasing collision energies zhang thanks support national natural science foundation china china postdoctoral science foundation foundation for authors of national doctoral dissertationchina fanedd no 201021 et al . phys . rev c84 031901(r 2011 ) shi al star collaboration nucl. . a830 187c 2009 ) schmah star collaboration quark matter 2011 shi star collaboration conference huovinen al b503 58 ( 2001 ) molnar voloshin . lett 91 092301 ( 2003 ) hwa yang . rev c67 064902 ( 2003 ) r.j et al 90 * 202303 ( 2003 ) | 0.498096 | 3,257 | 1,654 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,301 | we perform an analysis of the renormalization group evolution of the couplings in an extension to the standard model which contains a real triplet in the higgs sector . insisting that the model remain valid up to 1 tev allow us to map out the region of allowed mass for the higgs bosons .
we conclude that it is possible for there to be no light higgs bosons without any otherwise dramatic deviation from the physics of the standard model . plus 2 mm minus 2 mm 23.0 cm 17.0 cm -1.0 in -65pt mc - th-2002/14 + cavendish - hep-2003/01 + february 2003 + + j.r .
forshaw@xmath0 , a. sabio vera@xmath1 and b.e .
white@xmath0 @xmath0_department of physics & astronomy _ , + _ university of manchester _ , + _ oxford road _ , + _
manchester m13 9pl , u.k .
_ + @xmath1 _ cavendish laboratory _ , + _ university of cambridge _ , + _ madingley road _ , + _
cambridge cb3 ohe , u.k . _ | in a previous paper , we studied an extension of the standard model in which a real scalar @xmath2 triplet with zero hypercharge is added to the usual scalar @xmath2 doublet @xcite .
we showed that such an extension is allowed by the precision data and that the mass of the lightest higgs boson can be as big as 500 gev . to recap
, the lagrangian of the model in terms of the usual standard model higgs , @xmath3 , and the new triplet , @xmath4 , reads @xmath5 with a scalar potential @xmath6 @xmath7 are the pauli matrices .
the expansion of the field components is @xmath8 where @xmath9 and @xmath10 is the goldstone boson which is eaten by the @xmath11 .
the model violates custodial symmetry at tree level giving a prediction for the @xmath12-parameter of @xmath13 as discussed in @xcite , it is precisely this violation of custodial symmetry which allows the lightest higgs to be much heavier than in the standard model . by giving the triplet a non - zero vacuum expectation value ,
one is in effect making a positive tree - level contribution to the @xmath14-parameter , and this is enough to allow a heavier higgs . in the neutral higgs sector
we have two cp - even states which mix with angle @xmath15 .
the mass eigenstates @xmath16 are defined by @xmath17 there is also mixing in the charged higgs sector .
we define the mass eigenstates @xmath18 by @xmath19 the @xmath20 are the goldstone bosons corresponding to @xmath21 and , at tree level , the mixing angle is @xmath22 the precision electroweak data constrain @xmath23 to be smaller than about @xmath24 @xcite . in this paper
we wish to examine the renormalization group flow of the couplings and hence establish bounds on the scalar masses under the assumption that the triplet model remain valid up to some scale @xmath25 .
we take @xmath26 tev and make no statements about physics at higher scales . for the lagrangian of ( [ eqn : lag ] ) to remain appropriate up to @xmath25
, we demand that the scalar couplings @xmath27 remain perturbative and that the vacuum remain stable ( i.e. is a local minimum ) up to @xmath25 .
we begin in the next section with the calculation of the beta - functions . in section 3
we present our results away from the decoupling limit of the model and in section 4 we discuss decoupling .
the effective potential @xcite has the following one - loop expansion in the @xmath28 renormalization scheme and t hooft - landau gauge : @xmath29 @xmath30 is the renormalization scale and @xmath31 .
we have included the contributions from all the relevant physical states including the heaviest fermion , the top quark . the terms with @xmath32 correspond to the counterterms of the theory and the tree - level masses
are @xmath33 it is understood that we should substitute explicitly for the mixing angles , which are solutions to the equations @xmath34 the expressions for the counterterms are thus @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the counterterm for the vacuum energy .
the fact that the theory should be independent of the unphysical mass @xmath30 implies that the couplings and masses acquire a @xmath30 dependence governed by the renormalization group ( rg ) equation for the one - loop effective potential , i.e. @xmath37 in terms of the tree level masses this equation is equivalent to @xmath38 and , matching powers of fields , we can derive the beta functions : @xmath39 we can now make use of the anomalous dimensions for the two neutral higgs fields @xmath40 to write down our final expressions for the one - loop beta functions : @xmath41 in the gauge and top quark sector the beta functions for the @xmath42 , @xmath43 and yukawa couplings are the same as in the standard model , i.e. @xmath44 the @xmath2 coupling is modified due to the extra higgs triplet in the adjoint representation , i.e. @xmath45 working with the tree - level effective potential with couplings evolved using the one - loop @xmath23 and @xmath15 functions we are able to resum the leading logarithms to all orders in the effective potential
. it would be possible to include the next - to - leading logarithmic contributions by using the two - loop @xmath23 and @xmath15 functions and including the one - loop part of the effective potential , see @xcite .
let us now turn to the rg analysis .
we first introduce the parameter @xmath46 , related to the scale @xmath30 through @xmath47 .
we shall perform evolution starting at @xmath48 .
the rg equations are coupled differential equations in the set @xmath49 we choose rather to use the following set to define the input to the rg equations : @xmath50 within the accuracy to which we are working , the values of the couplings at @xmath48 can be obtained from the input set using the appropriate tree - level expressions . the vacuum conditions , @xmath51 allow us to write ( defining @xmath52 and @xmath53 ) @xmath54 inverting these relations we can thus fix the @xmath48 boundary conditions for the subsequent evolution : @xmath55 to ensure that the system remains in a local minimum we impose the condition that the squared masses should remain positive , i.e. @xmath56 we impose the further requirement that the couplings remain perturbative . in particular we insist that @xmath57 for @xmath58 and @xmath59 .
we run the evolution from @xmath60 to @xmath61 , with @xmath26 tev .
in this section we present our results of the higgs mass bounds in the regime where the triplet higgs can not be arbitrarily heavy . as we shall see in the next section , decoupling of the triplet
occurs when both mixing angles and their sum @xmath62 tend to zero and in this case , the triplet decouples from the doublet and can be arbitrarily heavy . we are free to choose the 3 scalar masses and the 2 mixing angles at @xmath48 . in figure [ b004g0 ]
we show the range of higgs masses allowed when there is no mixing in the neutral higgs sector , @xmath63 , for a value of @xmath64 .
such a value is towards the upper end of the range allowed by the precision data and is interesting because it allows a rather heavy lightest higgs ( e.g. for @xmath65 gev and for @xmath66 gev ) @xcite .
the strong correlation between the @xmath67 and @xmath68 masses arises in order that @xmath69 remain perturbative ( @xmath70 for masses @xmath71 ) .
the upper bound on the triplet higgs masses ( @xmath72 gev ) comes about from the perturbativity of @xmath73 whilst that on @xmath74 ( @xmath75 gev ) comes from the perturbativity of @xmath76 .
these latter two bounds can be estimated crudely by ignoring the evolution of the couplings directly from equations ( [ lam1 ] ) and ( [ lam3 ] ) .
evolution tightens the bounds due to the positivity of the beta functions , especially for the @xmath74 since @xmath77 .
the hole at low masses is due to vacuum stability . in figure [ b004g01 ]
we show the allowed regions for @xmath78 .
the correlation of the mainly triplet higgses is as in figure [ b004g0 ] . for large @xmath79 ( @xmath80 gev ) , the upper limit on the triplet higgs mass arises because @xmath76 becomes too large ( in this region @xmath81 . for smaller @xmath79
, @xmath76 is much smaller than @xmath73 and the upper bound comes from the largeness of @xmath73 with the tree - level estimate being @xmath82 .
the upper limit on @xmath79 is again a consequence of the perturbativity of @xmath76 , except at low @xmath67 masses , where it is due to the negativity of @xmath73 driving the vacuum unstable .
for very low @xmath83 , @xmath69 becoming too large is the problem . in figure [ b004gpi4 ] we show the allowed regions for @xmath84 . in this
maximal mixing scenario one loses the distinction between doublet and triplet higgses and the bounds are correspondingly more democratic .
the largeness of @xmath85 can be arranged either by tuning @xmath86 or by having small enough @xmath76 and @xmath87 . in the former case ,
all masses are approximately degenerate , as can be seen in the plot . in the latter case , which corresponds to light masses , the degeneracy is lifted .
the bounds for @xmath88 are very similar to those for @xmath89 on interchanging the neutral higgses @xmath68 and @xmath74 . for @xmath90 and small @xmath15 ( but still away from the decoupling regime )
the allowed regions are very similar to those for @xmath91 , i.e. as in figure [ b004g0 ] . for larger @xmath15 ,
the mass bounds are again as for larger @xmath23 but with the correlation between the neutral and charged higgs masses becoming even stronger than for larger @xmath23 .
we should stress that all of the previous discussion is valid for strictly non - zero @xmath23 .
the situation is quite different for @xmath92 .
if the neutral mixing is not zero ( which is required if we are to avoid decoupling ) then the vacuum conditions dictate that @xmath93 and @xmath94 and this renders equation ( [ eq : beta ] ) redundant . equation ( [ eq : gamma ] ) then yields @xmath95 and we have complete degeneracy , i.e. @xmath96 .
so far we have worked in a regime where the triplet does not decouple from the doublet .
clearly for @xmath97 there is no mixing between the doublet and triplet and there is no bound on the triplet mass .
this is a special case of the more general decoupling scenario , which occurs when @xmath98 , which we now discuss . for small mixing angles ,
the ( mainly ) triplet higgs has mass squared @xmath99 .
one possible solution to the mixing angle equations ( [ eq : beta ] ) and ( [ eq : gamma ] ) is that @xmath100 and any @xmath15 . in this case
the triplet higgs has mass @xmath71 .
this is the regime of the previous section .
however , it is also possible to solve the mixing angle equations with @xmath101 by keeping @xmath102 large , i.e. ( [ eq : beta ] ) gives @xmath103 .
in this case , equation ( [ eq : gamma ] ) forces @xmath104 .
this is the decoupling limit in which the triplet mass lies far above the mass of the doublet and the low energy model looks identical to the standard model .
tree level arguments on the perturbativity of @xmath73 allow us to quantify the approach to decoupling from the point of view of the triplet higgs mass .
in particular ( [ lam3 ] ) dictates that , for small @xmath23 and @xmath15 , @xmath105 by virtue of the smallness of @xmath106 this relation picks up relatively small loop corrections .
this bound clearly demonstrates decoupling .
it also re - iterates the results of the previous section , i.e. for small @xmath107 the limit is as in figure 1 and for small @xmath108 the limit is as in figure 2 .
we remark that the pseudo - decoupling regime , where @xmath23 is not too small , is of particular interest in that it again allows one to relax the mass bound on the lightest higgs coming from the precision data without otherwise changing the physics of the standard model @xcite .
we have computed the one - loop beta functions for the scalar couplings in an extension to the standard model which contains an additional real triplet higgs . through considerations of perturbativity of the couplings and vacuum stability we have been able to identify the allowed masses of the higgs bosons in the non - decoupling regime . in the decoupling regime
, the model tends to resemble the standard model .
we note that the theoretical mass bounds presented here will of course be tightened after considering the precision electroweak and direct search data .
such a study requires that the impact of the quantum corrections ( to the @xmath14 parameter ) for non - zero @xmath15 be computed ( they were not explored in @xcite ) . as a final remark
, we wish to emphasise that the near degeneracy of the triplet higgs masses ( the mass splitting is naturally @xmath109 ) ensures that , at least for small @xmath15 , the quantum corrections to the @xmath14 parameter are negligible ( the @xmath110 parameter vanishing since the triplet has zero hypercharge ) @xcite .
as shown in @xcite , this means that the lightest higgs boson can be heavy as a result of the compensation arising from the explicit tree - level violation of custodial symmetry which the real triplet induces .
thus it is quite possible to be in a regime where all the higgs bosons are heavy without any dramatic deviation from the physics of the standard model .
* acknowledgements * : we would like to thank ben allanach , arthur hebecker , apostolos pilaftsis and douglas ross for discussions .
asv acknowledges the support of pparc ( postdoctoral fellowship : ppa / p / s/1999/00446 ) .
j. r. forshaw , d. a. ross and b. e. white , jhep * 0110 * ( 2001 ) 007 .
s. r. coleman and e. weinberg , phys .
d * 7 * ( 1973 ) 1888 .
r. jackiw , phys .
d * 9 * ( 1974 ) 1686
. j. iliopoulos , c. itzykson and a. martin , rev .
* 47 * ( 1975 ) 165 .
b. kastening , phys .
b * 283 * ( 1992 ) 287 .
c. ford , d. r. jones , p. w. stephenson and m. b. einhorn , nucl .
b * 395 * ( 1993 ) 17 .
m. quiros , helv .
acta * 67 * ( 1994 ) 451 . | previous paper studied extension standard model scalar @xmath2 triplet zero hypercharge added usual @xmath2 doublet @xcite showed extension allowed precision data mass lightest higgs boson 500 gev lagrangian model higgs @xmath3 new triplet @xmath4 reads @xmath5 scalar potential @xmath6 @xmath7 pauli matrices expansion field @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 goldstone boson eaten by @xmath11 model violates custodial symmetry tree level prediction @xmath12-parameter @xmath13 allows lightest higgs heavier triplet non - zero vacuum expectation value positive tree - level contribution @xmath14-parameter heavier higgs neutral higgs sector two cp - even states mix with angle @xmath15 mass eigenstates @xmath16 defined by @xmath17 mixing charged higgs sector mass eigenstates @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 goldstone bosons @xmath21 mixing angle @xmath22 precision electroweak data constrain @xmath23 smaller than @xmath24 @xcite paper examine renormalization group flow couplings establish bounds scalar masses triplet model valid @xmath25take @xmath26 no statements physics higher scales lagrangian up to @xmath25 demand scalar couplings @xmath27 perturbative vacuum stable local minimum up to @xmath25 begin calculation beta - functions section 3 results decoupling limit section 4 discuss decoupling effective potential @xcite one - loop expansion @xmath28 renormalization scheme hooft - landau gauge @xmath29 @xmath30 renormalization scale @xmath31 included contributions from physical states heaviest fermion top quark terms @xmath32 counterterms theory tree - level masses @xmath33 substitute mixing angles solutions equations @xmath34 expressions counterterms @xmath35 @xmath36 counterterm vacuum energy theory independent of unphysical mass @xmath30 couplings masses dependence renormalization group equation one - loop effective potential @xmath37 tree level masses equation equivalent to @xmath38 derive beta functions : @xmath39 anomalous dimensions two neutral higgs fields @xmath40 final expressions one - loop beta functions @xmath41 gauge top quark sector beta functions @xmath42 @xmath43 yukawa couplings same as standard model@xmath44 @xmath2 coupling modified due extra higgs triplet @xmath45 tree - level effective potential couplings one - loop @xmath23 @xmath15 functions resum leading logarithms all orders effective potential include next - to - leading logarithmic contributions two - loop @xmath23 @xmath15 functions one - loop effective potential rg analysis introduce parameter @xmath46 scale @xmath30 through @xmath47 evolution starting at @xmath48 rg equations coupled differential equations set @xmath49 set define input rg equations @xmath50 values couplings at @xmath48 obtained from input set tree - level expressions vacuum conditions @xmath51 write @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 fix @xmath48 boundary conditions subsequent evolution @xmath55 squared masses remain positive @xmath56 couplings remain perturbative insist @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 run evolution from @xmath60 to @xmath61 @xmath26 tev present results higgs mass bounds regime triplet higgs not arbitrarily heavydecoupling triplet occurs when mixing angles sum @xmath62 tend zero triplet decouples from doublet arbitrarily heavy choose 3 scalar masses 2 mixing angles at @xmath48 figure [ b004g0 ] range higgs masses no mixing in neutral higgs sector @xmath63 for value @xmath64 upper end range precision data allows heavy lightest higgs @xmath65 gev @xmath66 gev strong correlation between @xmath67 @xmath68 masses @xmath69 perturbative @xmath70 @xmath71 upper bound on triplet higgs masses @xmath72 gev from perturbativity @xmath73 @xmath74 from perturbativity @xmath76 bounds estimated ignoring evolution couplings equations evolution tightens bounds positivity beta functions @xmath74 @xmath77 hole at low masses due to vacuum stability figure [ b004g01 allowed regions for @xmath78 correlation triplet higgses figure b004g0 large @xmath79 @xmath80 gev upper limit triplet higgs mass because @xmath76 becomes too large @xmath81smaller @xmath79 @xmath76 smaller than @xmath73 upper bound from largeness @xmath73 tree - level estimate @xmath82 upper limit @xmath79 consequence perturbativity @xmath76 except low @xmath67 masses due to negativity @xmath73 vacuum unstable low @xmath83 @xmath69 too large problem figure b004gpi4 allowed regions @xmath84 maximal mixing scenario loses distinction between doublet triplet higgses more democratic largeness @xmath85 arranged tuning @xmath86 or small enough @xmath76 @xmath87 former case all masses degenerate latter case light masses degeneracy lifted bounds @xmath88 similar to @xmath89 interchanging neutral higgses @xmath68 @xmath74 @xmath90 small @xmath15 decoupling regime allowed regions similar to @xmath91 figure b004g0 larger @xmath15 mass bounds @xmath23 correlation between neutral charged higgs masses stronger previous discussion valid for non - zero @xmath23 different for @xmath92 neutral mixing not zero avoid decoupling vacuum conditions dictate @xmath93 @xmath94 renders equation redundantequation eq : gamma yields @xmath95 complete degeneracy @xmath96 regime triplet decouple from doublet @xmath97 no mixing between doublet triplet no bound on triplet mass special case general decoupling scenario occurs @xmath98 small mixing angles triplet higgs mass @xmath99 solution mixing angle equations @xmath100 @xmath15 triplet higgs has mass @xmath71 regime previous section solve mixing equations with @xmath101 @xmath102 large eq : beta gives @xmath103 equation ( [ eq : gamma ] forces @xmath104 decoupling limit triplet mass above mass doublet low energy model identical to standard model tree level arguments on perturbativity of @xmath73 quantify approach decoupling triplet higgs mass ( [ lam3 ] ) dictates small @xmath23 and @xmath15 @xmath105 smallness @xmath106 relation picks up small loop corrections bound demonstrates decoupling re - iterates results previous section small @xmath107 limit figure 1 small @xmath108 limit figure 2pseudo - decoupling regime @xmath23 not small allows relax mass bound on lightest higgs without changing physics standard model computed one - loop beta functions for scalar couplings in extension standard model additional real triplet higgs perturbativity vacuum stability allowed masses higgs bosons in non - decoupling regime decoupling regime model standard model theoretical mass bounds tightened after precision electroweak direct search data study requires impact quantum corrections to @xmath14 parameter for non - zero @xmath15 computed not explored @xcite near degeneracy of triplet higgs masses mass splitting @xmath109 ) ensures small @xmath15 quantum corrections to @xmath14 parameter negligible @xmath110 parameter triplet zero hypercharge lightest higgs boson can be heavy compensation from tree - level violation of custodial symmetry triplet possible regime all higgs bosons heavy without deviation from physics standard model ben allanach arthur hebecker apostolos pilaftsis douglas ross for discussions asv support of pparc ( postdoctoral fellowship : ppa / / s/1999/00446 )forshaw ross white jhep 0110 2001 ) 007 coleman weinberg phys . d 7 * 1973 ) 1888 jackiw phys . d 9 1974 ) 1686 iliopoulos itzykson rev. 47 * 1975 ) 165 kastening . 283 1992 ) 287 ford jones stephenson einhorn nucl 395 * 1993 ) 17 quiros helv acta 67 * 1994 ) 451 | 0.502919 | 3,292 | 1,757 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,314 | in this paper , we introduce a new method to construct evolving networks based on the construction of the sierpinski gasket . using self - similarity and renewal theorem
, we obtain the asymptotic formula for average path length of our evolving networks . | the sierpinski gasket described in 1915 by w. sierpiski is a classical fractal .
suppose @xmath0 is the solid regular triangle with vertexes @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 let @xmath4 be the contracting similitude for @xmath5 then @xmath6and the sierpinski gasket @xmath7 is the self - similar set , which is the unique invariant set @xcite of ifs @xmath8 satisfying@xmath9the sierpinski gasket is important for the study of fractals , e.g. , the sierpinski gasket is a typical example of post - critically finite self - similar fractals on which the dirichlet forms and laplacians can be constructed by kigami @xcite , see also strichartz @xcite .
for the word @xmath10 with letters in @xmath11 , i.e. , every letter @xmath12 for all @xmath13 we denote by latexmath:[$|\sigma @xmath10 and @xmath15 we call @xmath16 a prefix of @xmath17 and denote by @xmath18 if @xmath19 and @xmath20 we also write @xmath21 if @xmath22 or @xmath23 when @xmath24 with @xmath25 we say that @xmath17 is the father of @xmath16 and @xmath16 is a child of @xmath26 given @xmath27 we write @xmath28 which is a solid regular triangle with side length @xmath29 for notational convenience , we write @xmath30 with empty word @xmath31 we also denote @xmath32 if @xmath18 then @xmath33 for solid triangle @xmath34 with word @xmath35 we denote by @xmath36 its boundary consisting of @xmath37 sides , where every side is a line segment with side length @xmath29 complex networks arise from natural and social phenomena , such as the internet , the collaborations in research , and the social relationships .
these networks have in common two structural characteristics : the small - world effect and the scale - freeness ( _ power - law _ degree distribution ) , as indicated , respectively , in the seminal papers by watts and strogatz @xcite and by barabsi and albert @xcite .
in fact complex networks also exhibit _ self - similarity _ as demonstrated by song , havlin and makse @xcite and fractals possess the feature of _ power law _ in terms of their fractal dimension ( e.g. see falconer03 ) .
recently self - similar fractals are used to model evolving networks , for example , in a series of papers , zhang et al . zzfgz07,zzzcg08,gwzzw09 use the sierpinski gasket to construct evolving networks .
there are also some complex networks modelled on self - similar fractals , for example , liu and kong @xcite and chen et al .
@xcite study koch networks , zhang et al .
@xcite investigate the networks constructed from vicsek fractals .
see also dai and liu @xcite , sun et al .
@xcite and zhou et al .
@xcite . in the paper
, we introduce a new method to construct evolving networks modelled on sierpinski gasket and study the asymptotic formula for average path length .
since @xmath7 is connected , we can construct the network from geometry as follows .
fix an integer @xmath38 we consider a network @xmath39 with vertex set @xmath40 where @xmath41 for the edge set of @xmath42 there is a unique edge between distinct words @xmath16 and @xmath17 ( denoted by @xmath43 ) if and only if @xmath44we can illustrate the geodesic paths in figure 2 for @xmath45 .
we have @xmath46 since @xmath47 and @xmath48 we also get another geodesic path from @xmath49to @xmath50 @xmath51 since @xmath52 and @xmath53,$ ] the line segment between @xmath54 and @xmath55 we also have some geodesic paths from @xmath56to @xmath50 @xmath57 and @xmath58 also we have @xmath59 but @xmath60 then the geodesic distance between @xmath61 and @xmath62 is @xmath63 in figure 2 , @xmath64 , @xmath65 and @xmath66 .
in fact , by observation we have [ c : two]suppose @xmath67 with @xmath68 then @xmath69 if and only if there are at most two letters in @xmath70 in particular , if @xmath67 and @xmath71 then @xmath72 for example , @xmath73 and @xmath74 are neighbors , but @xmath73 and @xmath75 are not . for every @xmath38
we denote @xmath76 the geodesic distance on @xmath77 let@xmath78be the average path length of the complex network @xmath79 we can state our main result as follows .
we have the asymptotic formula @xmath80 [ r:6 ] since @xmath81 , theorem @xmath82 implies that the evolving networks @xmath39 have small average path length , namely @xmath83 .
the paper is organized as follows . in section 2
we give notations and sketch of proof for theorem 1,consisting of four steps . in sections 3 - 6
, we will provide details for the four steps respectively .
our main techniques come from the self - similarity and the renewal theorem .
we will illustrate our following four steps needed to prove theorem 1 . given a small solid triangle @xmath84
we can find a maximal solid triangle @xmath85 which contains @xmath86 and their boundaries are touching . translating into the language of words , for a given word @xmath87 we can find a unique shortest word @xmath88 such that @xmath89 and @xmath90 for a word @xmath91 where @xmath92 is the maximal suffix with at most two letters appearing , using claim [ c : two ] we have @xmath93 iterating @xmath94 again and again
, we obtain a sequence @xmath95 let @xmath96 in particular , we define @xmath97 for @xmath98 we have @xmath99 @xmath100 , @xmath101and @xmath102 then @xmath103 we will prove in section 3 in fact , this proposition shows that @xmath106 is independent of the choice of @xmath107 whenever @xmath108 in this case , we also write @xmath109 write @xmath110then @xmath111 is independent of @xmath38 in fact , @xmath111 is the minimal number of moves for @xmath112 to touch the boundary of @xmath113 * step 2 . * given @xmath114 we consider the average geodesic distance between the empty word and word of length @xmath115 and set @xmath116and @xmath117 we will obtain the limit property of @xmath118 as @xmath119 in section 4 . as illustrated in figure 3 ,
proposition [ p : asym ] shows that the _ typical _ geodesic path is the geodesic path between @xmath133 and @xmath134 whose first letters of codings are different . on the other hand , for example the geodesic path between @xmath133 and @xmath135 with the same first letter will give negligible contribution to @xmath136 using @xmath137 with @xmath129 we obtain that @xmath138 , ignoring the terms like @xmath139 we have @xmath140where @xmath141 is the average value of @xmath142 using stolz theorem , we have @xmath143 in fact , suppose @xmath147 @xmath148 or @xmath37 for all @xmath149 is composed of infinite words with letters in @xmath150 then we have a natural mass distribution @xmath151 on @xmath152 such that for any word @xmath153 of length @xmath154 @xmath155for any word @xmath35 let @xmath156 denote the cardinality of letters appearing in word @xmath157 for @xmath151-almost all @xmath158 let @xmath159then @xmath160 for @xmath151-almost all @xmath161 suppose @xmath162 and @xmath163 and there is an infinite sequence @xmath164 of integers such that @xmath165 for all @xmath166 and @xmath167satisfying @xmath168 and @xmath169 for all @xmath170 we then let @xmath171since @xmath172 is uniquely determined by word @xmath173 and @xmath151 is symmetric for letters in @xmath174 we find that @xmath175 is a sequence of positive independent identically distributed random variables with @xmath176 for example , for @xmath177 then @xmath178 and @xmath179 @xmath180 , @xmath181 | sierpinski gasket described 1915 classical fractal @xmath0 solid regular triangle vertexes @xmath1 @xmath4 contracting similitude @xmath5 sierpinski gasket @xmath7 self - similar set unique invariant set @xmath8 sierpinski gasket important study fractals post - critically finite self - similar fractals dirichlet forms laplacians constructed kigami strichartz word @xmath10 letters @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 denote latexmath:[$|\sigma @xmath16 prefix @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath25 @xmath17 father @xmath16 @xmath16 child @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 solid regular triangle side length write @xmath30 empty word @xmath31 denote @xmath32 @xmath18 @xmath33 solid triangle @xmath34 word @xmath35 denote @xmath36 boundary @xmath37 sides every side line segment side length complex networks natural social phenomena internet collaborations relationshipsnetworks two structural characteristics small - world effect scale - freeness power - law degree distribution indicated in papers watts strogatz barabsi albert complex networks exhibit self - similarity demonstrated by song havlin makse fractals possess power law fractal dimension falconer03 self - similar fractals used model evolving networks zhang use sierpinski gasket complex networks modelled on self - similar fractals liu kong chen study koch networks zhang networks from vicsek fractals dai liu sun zhou introduce new method to construct evolving networks sierpinski gasket study asymptotic formula for average path length @xmath7 connected construct network from geometry fix integer @xmath38 network @xmath39 with vertex set @xmath40 @xmath41 edge set @xmath42 unique edge between words @xmath16 @xmath17 denoted by @xmath43 ) if illustrate geodesic paths in figure 2 for @xmath45@xmath46 @xmath47 geodesic path @xmath49to @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath54 @xmath55 geodesic paths @xmath56to @xmath50 @xmath57 @xmath59 @xmath60 geodesic distance @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 figure 2 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 two letters in @xmath70 @xmath67 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 neighbors @xmath73 @xmath75 not @xmath38 @xmath76 geodesic distance @xmath77@xmath78be average path length complex network @xmath79 result asymptotic formula @xmath80 r:6 @xmath81 theorem @xmath82 evolving networks @xmath39 small average path length @xmath83 paper organized section 2 notations sketch theorem 1 four steps sections 3 - 6 details four steps techniques self - similarity renewal theorem four steps prove theorem 1 small solid triangle @xmath84 maximal solid triangle @xmath85 @xmath86 boundaries touchingtranslating language word @xmath87 unique shortest word @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 maximal suffix two letters claim c two @xmath93 @xmath94 sequence @xmath95 @xmath96 define @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath102 @xmath103 prove section 3 proposition shows @xmath106 independent @xmath107 @xmath108 write @xmath109 @xmath111 independent @xmath38 @xmath111 minimal moves @xmath112 touch boundary @xmath113 step 2 @xmath114 average geodesic distance empty word length @xmath115 set @xmath117 obtain limit property @xmath118 @xmath119 section 4 figure 3 proposition [ p : asym ] typical geodesic path @xmath133 @xmath134 first letters codings differentgeodesic path between @xmath133 @xmath135 same first letter negligible contribution to @xmath136 @xmath137 @xmath129 @xmath138 ignoring @xmath141 average value @xmath142 @xmath143 @xmath147 @xmath148 @xmath149 infinite words letters @xmath150 natural mass distribution @xmath151 on @xmath152 word @xmath153 @xmath154 @xmath156 cardinality letters @xmath157 @xmath151 @xmath158 @xmath160 @xmath151 @xmath161 @xmath162 @xmath163 infinite sequence @xmath164 of integers @xmath165 @xmath166 @xmath168 @xmath169 @xmath170 determined by word @xmath173 @xmath151 symmetric letters @xmath174 @xmath175 sequence positive independent distributed random variables @xmath176 @xmath177 @xmath178 @xmath179 @xmath180 @xmath181 | 0.311309 | 2,013 | 1,109 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,334 | we report the discovery of an optical einstein ring in the sculptor constellation , iac j010127 - 334319 , in the vicinity of the sculptor dwarf spheroidal galaxy .
it is an almost complete ring ( @xmath0 ) with a diameter of @xmath1 .
the discovery was made serendipitously from inspecting dark energy camera ( decam ) archive imaging data .
confirmation of the object nature has been obtained by deriving spectroscopic redshifts for both components , lens and source , from observations at the @xmath2 m gran telescopio canarias ( gtc ) with the spectrograph osiris .
the lens , a massive early - type galaxy , has a redshift of @xmath3 while the source is a starburst galaxy with redshift of @xmath4 .
the total enclosed mass that produces the lensing effect has been estimated to be @xmath5 .
[ firstpage ] galaxies : evolution galaxies : distances and redshifts galaxies : elliptical and lenticular , cd galaxies : starburst gravitational lensing : strong | strongly lensed galaxies are very important in the study of galaxy formation and evolution because they permit derivation of important physical parameters such as the total mass of the lensing object , without any assumption on the dynamics .
cases in which the einstein ring ( er ) is almost complete and the central lensing galaxy isolated are rare ; these permit constraining with great accuracy the enclosed mass within the projected einstein radius @xmath6 @xcite .
@xcite predicted several @xmath7 optical er to be detectable over the whole sky , down to a magnitude limit of @xmath8 and a lower limit for the enclosed mass of @xmath9 .
this notwithstanding , despite extensive surveys ( see for example @xcite ) only a few tens of complete or nearly complete optical ers have been identified so far , and among these objects , only a few show a close similarity , in morphology and elongation of the ring , to the one we discuss in the present work .
the first er to be discovered is the radio source mg1131 + 0456 @xcite .
@xcite report the discovery of a partial er ( @xmath10 ) with @xmath11 ; the background oii emitting galaxy at @xmath12 is lensed by an elliptical massive galaxy at @xmath13 .
this is the first known case in the literature of a er discovered at optical wavelengths .
discovered an almost complete er ( @xmath14 ) with @xmath15 produced by a massive and isolated elliptical galaxy at @xmath16 . the source galaxy is a starburst at @xmath17 .
then , a similar er to the one we report in this letter , in morphology , but not in the physics of the source galaxy , a bx galaxy , is the so called `` cosmic horseshoe '' @xcite ; the ring extension is similar to the one we report here , ( @xmath0 ) , but the einstein radius is double , @xmath18 ; the lensing galaxy has a huge mass of @xmath19 . other partial
er discovered recently are : the `` cosmic eye '' @xcite , the `` 8 oclock arc '' @xcite and the `` clone '' @xcite .
here we report the discovery of iac j010127 - 334319 , an optical , almost complete er , that we refer to as the `` canarias einstein ring '' , noticed as a peculiar object in decam images .
no previous reference to the object has been found in the literature .
subsequently we observed it with osiris@gtc for a spectroscopic confirmation of its nature . in this letter
we provide the first physical parameters of this system . in the following discussion
we assume a flat cosmology with @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 .
l r lens & + right ascension(j2000 ) : & @xmath23 + declination(j2000 ) : & @xmath24 + redshift : & @xmath25 + surface brightness lens ( @xmath26,@xmath27 ) @xmath28}$ ] : & @xmath29 + apparent magnitude ( @xmath26,@xmath27 ) & @xmath30 + absolute magnitude ( @xmath26,@xmath27 ) & @xmath31 + + ring & + redshift : & @xmath32 + einstein radius : & @xmath33 + enclosed mass @xmath34}$ ] : & @xmath35 + surface brightness a ( @xmath26,@xmath27 ) @xmath28}$ ] : & @xmath36 + surface brightness b ( @xmath26,@xmath27 ) @xmath28}$ ] : & @xmath37 + surface brightness c ( @xmath26,@xmath27 ) @xmath28}$ ] : & @xmath38 + apparent magnitude ( @xmath26,@xmath27 ) & @xmath39 + + [ tab : valori ]
the serendipitous discovery of iac j010127 - 334319 was made while performing photometry on stacked images , in @xmath26 and @xmath27 filters , taken with decam @xcite at the blanco 4 m telescope at the cerro tololo inter - american observatory ( ctio ) , reduced with the noao community pipeline @xcite and obtained from the noao science archive @xcite .
the total exposure time is @xmath40 s in the @xmath26 filter and @xmath41 s in the @xmath27 filter .
figure [ fig : color ] shows the resulting color composite which translates to @xmath42 .
three peaks , a , b and c , are clearly visible ( bottom right panel of figure [ fig : color ] ) ; they are located respectively at @xmath43 , @xmath44 and @xmath45 from north counterclockwise . in table [ tab : valori ] all the derived parameters for the object are listed . from the decam photometry we estimated an apparent magnitude for the lens in both @xmath26 and @xmath27 bands of @xmath46 , @xmath47 .
the color @xmath48 indicates that this galaxy is probably a luminous red galaxy @xcite .
all the details about the photometric calibration will be given in a forthcoming paper ( bettinelli et al .
in prep . ) .
in order to confirm the lensing nature of this system we performed a spectroscopic follow - up at the @xmath2 m gran telescopio canarias ( gtc ) on roque de los muchachos observatory ( la palma , spain ) using the optical system for imaging and low - intermediate - resolution integrated spectroscopy ( osiris ) spectrograph .
osiris has a mosaic of two e2v ccd42 - 82 ( @xmath49 ) .
all the obtained spectra were registered on the second detector , which is the default for long - slit spectroscopy .
we used a binning of @xmath50 providing a pixel size of @xmath51 , and the grism r300b , which provides a spectral coverage of @xmath52 and a nominal dispersion of @xmath53 @xmath54 .
the slit width was @xmath55 .
long - slit spectral observations were performed on 2015 december 2 in good seeing conditions of @xmath56 .
the slit was placed along the n - s direction , in order to minimize the effects of atmospheric differential refraction at culmination .
the total exposure time was 3600 s divided into 6 exposures of 600 s each . in each of the 6 exposures
the two components , ring and lensing galaxy , have been detected and in particular their spectra were not overlapping .
the position of the slit was such that the spectra obtained for the ring refers to peak b. for the pre - reduction we have used the osiris offline pipeline software ( oops ) ; sky subtraction and flux calibration were performed using iraf .
we performed wavelength calibration using standard hgar+ne+xe arc lamps ; the resulting error on wavelength determination has been measured to be consistent with the above spectral resolution .
we corrected the extracted spectra for instrumental response using observations of the spectrophotometric standard star gd140 , a white dwarf , obtained the same night .
the fluxes of this standard star are available in @xcite .
in order to derive the redshifts for the two components we noted the strong emission line in the source spectrum and the 4000 balmer discontinuity in the lens spectrum .
this led us to choose template models for a starburst galaxy and a early - type galaxy respectively , as specified below . following line identification , we determined redshifts . using the template spectra by @xcite results that the spectrum of the lens galaxy fits well the spectrum of a s0 galaxy ( see figure [ fig : spec ] ) , a typical early - type galaxy characterized by a large increase in flux from the uv part of the spectrum to the optical .
the @xmath57 balmer discontinuity at @xmath58 is noticeable .
the redshift of the lens galaxy is @xmath59 and it has been determined from the measurements of : @xmath60 , ca k @xmath61 , ca h @xmath62 , @xmath63 , g - band @xmath64 , mg - b2 @xmath65 , mg - b1 @xmath66 ( marked red features from left to right in figure [ fig : spec ] middle panel ) . for the source galaxy we used the template spectra by @xcite and we found that the spectrum best fitting our observed spectrum corresponds to a starburst galaxy in the case of _ clumpy scattering slab _ , where it is assumed that clumped dust is located close to the source of radiation . in such circumstances ,
@xcite show that scattering into the line of sight dominates over absorption by the dust , providing a significant positive contribution to the emerging radiation .
this template spectrum fits well the strong @xmath67 emission line .
we also identified the following lines : @xmath68 , @xmath69 , 11 @xmath70 , @xmath71,10 @xmath72 ( marked blue features from left to right in figure [ fig : spec ] upper panel ) . according to these features , we derived for the source galaxy a redshift of @xmath73 .
we note that the selected slit position enable us to extract only the portion of the spectrum corresponding to peak b ( see figure [ fig : color ] ) ; this notwithstanding , the emission coming from the opposite side of the ring can be easily noted in our spectra .
the strong circular symmetry of our object ( see figure [ fig : color ] ) suggests that it can be approximated to the case of a circularly symmetric lens , with source and lens in the line of sight . under these assumptions , for an arbitrary mass profile @xmath74 , ( i.e. without assuming any particular model for the potential ) , we can apply the following relation @xcite and solve it for the mass .
@xmath75 here @xmath76 is the einstein radius in radians ; @xmath74 is the mass enclosed within the einstein radius ; @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 are the angular diameter distances respectively of source - lens , lens - observer and source - observer .
these last quantities are related to the relative comoving distances and , in general , this relation depends on the assumed curvature of the universe @xcite . in our case
@xmath80 has been assumed and the resulting angular diameter distances are @xmath81 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 .
we calculated a total mass @xmath5 where the error on the mass ( @xmath84 ) is overwhelmingly due to the measurement error in the determination of the einstein radius , that we have estimated to be @xmath85 which corresponds to @xmath86 .
the error on the redshift derives from the error estimated on the wavelength calibration which is @xmath87 .
this value is consistent with the spectral resolution ( @xmath53 @xmath54 ) of the grating r300b that we used . under the assumption of a singular isothermal sphere ( sis ) it is possible to give an estimate of the magnification of the ring : @xmath88 , where @xmath89 is the source size .
from @xcite the average size of a starburst galaxy in our redshift range is @xmath90 kpc which corresponds to @xmath91 .
the derived magnification is @xmath92 .
we determined also the mass - to - light ratio of the lens in the @xmath93 band ; a k - correction of 2.1 has been derived for the lens using the ned calculator @xcite .
the resulting ratio is @xmath94 .
the former mass estimate can be improved by applying to the system a singular isothermal ellipsoid ( sie ) model using the gravlens / lensmodel software @xcite .
this software allows to fit a sie model using only the image positions and fluxes .
the obtained best - fit model is plotted in figure [ fig : mass ] .
the solutions have been derived for pointlike sources ; the ring shape is due to the fact that the source should actually be more extended with respect to the caustics than is shown here .
the best fit ellipticity is @xmath95 calculated as @xmath96 where @xmath97 is the axis ratio ; the associated position angle is -57 deg , angle measured from north to east .
the best fit @xmath98 value is 6.12 , calculated setting to 0 the weights relative to image fluxes .
the derived einstein radius is @xmath99 , which translates in an enclosed mass of @xmath100 , hence in excellent agreement with our previous estimate .
we report the discovery of an almost complete ( @xmath0 ) circular optical einstein ring in the constellation of sculptor .
the gravitational lens is a massive luminous red galaxy at @xmath101 .
the source galaxy is a starburst at redshift @xmath102 ; its spectrum is dominated by a strong emission line . using these redshift determinations and the einstein radius @xmath103 we calculated the total enclosed mass that produced the lensing effect : @xmath5 .
all the parameters we determined for iac j010127 - 334319 are listed in table [ tab : valori ] .
the authors thank the anonymous referee for the constructive comments that significantly improved the manuscript .
the authors are grateful to all the gtc staff and in particular to dr .
a. cabrera - lavers for his support in refining the spectroscopical observations during the phase-2 .
the authors also thank dr .
j. falcn - barroso for the helpful discussion .
this letter is based on observations made with the gtc telescope , in the spanish observatorio del roque de los muchachos of the instituto de astrofsica de canarias , under director s discretionary time .
this project used data obtained with the dark energy camera ( decam ) , which was constructed by the dark energy survey ( des ) collaboration .
funding for the des projects has been provided by the doe and nsf ( usa ) , mise ( spain ) , stfc ( uk ) , hefce ( uk ) , ncsa ( uiuc ) , kicp ( u. chicago ) , ccapp ( ohio state ) , mifpa ( texas a&m ) , cnpq , faperj , finep ( brazil ) , mineco ( spain ) , dfg ( germany ) and the collaborating institutions in the dark energy survey , which are argonne lab , uc santa cruz , university of cambridge , ciemat - madrid , university of chicago , university college london , des - brazil consortium , university of edinburgh , eth zrich , fermilab , university of illinois , ice ( ieec - csic ) , ifae barcelona , lawrence berkeley lab , lmu mnchen and the associated excellence cluster universe , university of michigan , noao , university of nottingham , ohio state university , university of pennsylvania , university of portsmouth , slac national lab , stanford university , university of sussex , and texas a&m university .
this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration . | lensed galaxies important in galaxy formation evolution permit derivation physical parameters total mass lensing object without assumption dynamics cases einstein ring almost complete central lensing galaxy isolated rare permit constraining enclosed mass within projected einstein radius @xmath6 @xcite predicted @xmath7 optical er detectable over sky to magnitude limit @xmath8 lower limit mass @xmath9 despite surveys few tens complete or nearly complete optical ers identified few show close similarity in morphology elongation ring to first er discovered radio source mg1131 + 0456 @xcite partial er @xmath10 ) with @xmath11 background emitting galaxy at @xmath12 lensed by elliptical massive galaxy at @xmath13 first case of er discovered at optical wavelengths almost complete er @xmath14 ) with @xmath15 produced by massive isolated elliptical galaxy at @xmath16 source galaxy starburst at @xmath17 similar er bx galaxy cosmic horseshoe '' @xcite ring extension similar einstein radius double @xmath18 lensing galaxy huge mass of @xmath19 partial discovered recently `` cosmic eye '' 8 oclock arc clone '' report discovery of iac j010127 - 334319 optical almost complete er `` canarias einstein ring '' peculiar object in decam images no previous reference literature observed with osiris@gtc spectroscopic confirmation nature first physical parameters system assume flat cosmology with @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 r lens right ascension(j2000 ) @xmath23 + declination(j2000 @xmath24 + redshift @xmath25 + surface brightness lens @xmath26 @xmath29 + apparent magnitude @xmath30 + absolute magnitude @xmath31 ring redshift @xmath32 + einstein radius @xmath33 + enclosed mass @xmath35 + surface brightness @xmath36 + surface brightness b @xmath37 + surface brightness c @xmath38 + apparent magnitude @xmath39 + valori serendipitous discovery of iac j010127 - 334319 photometry on stacked images @xmath26 @xmath27 filters taken decam @xcite blanco 4 m telescope cerro tololo inter - american observatory reduced noao community pipeline @xcite noao science archive total exposure time @xmath40 s @xmath26 filter @xmath41 s @xmath27 filter figure shows color composite translates @xmath42 three peaks a b c visible located at @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 north counterclockwise table valori derived parameters object listeddecam photometry estimated magnitude lens in @xmath26 bands @xmath46 color @xmath48 indicates luminous red galaxy @xcite details photometric calibration forthcoming paper bettinelli confirm lensing nature performed spectroscopic follow - up at @xmath2 m gran telescopio canarias roque de los muchachos observatory optical system imaging spectroscopy osiris spectrograph osiris mosaic e2v ccd42 - 82 ( @xmath49 ) spectra registered second detector default long - slit spectroscopy used binning @xmath50 pixel size @xmath51 grism r300b spectral coverage @xmath52 dispersion @xmath53 @xmath54 slit width @xmath55 long - slit observations performed 2015 december 2 good seeing conditions @xmath56 slit placed along n - s direction minimize atmospheric differential refraction total exposure time 3600 s 6 exposures 600 components ring lensing galaxy detected spectra not overlapping position slit spectra ring to peak b pre - reduction used osiris offline pipeline software sky subtraction flux calibration using iraf performed wavelength calibration using standard hgar+ne+xe arc lamps error consistent with spectral resolution corrected extracted spectra for using observations spectrophotometric standard star gd140 white dwarf fluxes available in @xcite redshifts for components noted strong emission line in source spectrum 4000 balmer discontinuity in lens spectrum template models for starburst galaxy and early - type galaxy determined redshifts template spectra @xcite spectrum lens galaxy fits spectrum s0 galaxy typical early - type galaxy large increase in flux from uv to optical @xmath57 balmer discontinuity at @xmath58 noticeable redshift of lens galaxy is @xmath59 determined from measurements of @xmath60 k @xmath61 h @xmath62 @xmath63 g @xmath64 - b2 @xmath65 - b1 @xmath66 for source galaxy used template spectra by @xcite spectrum best fitting corresponds to starburst galaxy in clumpy scattering slab dust close to source radiation @xcite scattering into line of sight dominates over absorption positive contribution to emerging radiationtemplate spectrum fits @xmath67 emission line identified lines @xmath68 @xmath70 @xmath72 marked blue features to figure upper panel derived for source galaxy redshift of @xmath73 selected slit position extract portion spectrum corresponding to peak b emission from opposite side ring noted in spectra strong circular symmetry of object suggests circularly symmetric lens source and lens in line of sight for arbitrary mass profile @xmath74 apply relation @xcite solve for mass @xmath75 @xmath76 einstein radius in radians @xmath74 mass enclosed within einstein radius @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 angular diameter distances of source - lens lens - observer source - observer quantities related to relative comoving distances relation depends on assumed curvature universe @xmath80 assumed resulting angular diameter distances are @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 calculated total mass @xmath5 error on mass ( @xmath84 ) due to measurement error einstein radius estimated @xmath85 corresponds to @xmath86 error redshift from wavelength calibration @xmath87 consistent with spectral resolution @xmath53 @xmath54 grating r300b singular isothermal sphere magnification ring @xmath88 @xmath89 source size average size starburst galaxy in redshift range @xmath90 kpc corresponds to @xmath91 derived magnification is @xmath92 mass - to - light ratio lens in @xmath93 band k - correction 2.1 derived calculator @xcite resulting ratio is @xmath94 mass estimate singular isothermal ellipsoid model gravlens / lensmodel software @xcite image positions fluxes best - fit model plotted in figure solutions derived for pointlike sources ring shape due source more extended best fit ellipticity is @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 axis ratio position angle -57 deg best fit @xmath98 value 6.12 0 weights relative image fluxes derived einstein radius is @xmath99 enclosed mass of @xmath100 agreement with previous estimate discovery almost complete ) circular optical einstein ring in constellation sculptor gravitational lens is massive luminous red galaxy at @xmath101 source galaxy starburst at redshift @xmath102 spectrum dominated strong emission line using redshift determinations einstein radius @xmath103 calculated total enclosed mass lensing effect @xmath5 parameters for iac j010127 - 334319 in table authors thank anonymous referee comments manuscript grateful gtc staff dr . a. cabrera - lavers support refining spectroscopical observations phase-2 thank dr . j. falcn - barroso discussion letter based on observations gtc telescope spanish observatorio del roque de los muchachos instituto de astrofsica de canarias director s discretionary time project used data dark energy camera constructed survey collaboration funding provided by doe nsf mise stfc hefce ncsa kicpchicago ccapp ohio mifpa texas&m cnpq faperj finep brazil mineco spain dfg germany institutions dark energy survey argonne lab uc santa cruz university cambridge ciemat madrid chicago london des - brazil consortium edinburgh eth zrich fermilab university illinois ice ifae barcelona lawrence berkeley lab lmu mnchen cluster universe university michigan noao nottingham ohio state university pennsylvania portsmouth slac national lab stanford university sussex texas a&m university research nasa ipac extragalactic database jet propulsion laboratory california institute technology national aeronautics space administration | 0.562375 | 3,294 | 1,700 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,337 | the current status of tests of the theory of strong interactions , quantum chromo dynamics ( qcd ) , with data from hadron production in @xmath0 annihilation experiments is reviewed .
the lep experiments aleph , delphi , l3 and opal have published many analyses with data recorded on the @xmath1 resonance at @xmath2 gev and above up to @xmath3 gev .
there are also results from sld at @xmath2 gev and from reanalysis of data recorded by the jade experiment at @xmath4 gev .
the results of studies of jet and event shape observables , of particle production and of quark gluon jet differences are compared with predictions by perturbative qcd calculations .
determinations of the strong coupling constant @xmath5from jet and event shape observables , scaling violation and fragmentation functions , inclusive observables from @xmath1 decays , hadronic @xmath6 decays and hadron production in low energy @xmath0annihilation are discussed .
updates of the measurements are performed where new data or improved calculations have become available . the best value of @xmath5 is obtained from an average of measurements using inclusive observables calculated in nnlo qcd : @xmath7 where the error is dominated by theoretical systematic uncertainties .
the other measurements of @xmath5 are in good agreement with this value .
finally , investigations of the gauge structure of qcd are summarised and the best values for the colour factors are determined : @xmath8 with errors dominated by systematic uncertainties and in good agreement with the expectation from qcd with the su(3 ) gauge symmetry . | the interactions between the constituents of matter are successfully described by the four forces : the weak , electromagnetic and strong forces and the gravitational force .
the weak and the strong interactions occur at small atomic to subatomic distances , the electromagnetic interaction is observed at subatomic to macroscopic distances while effects of gravitation only play a role at macroscopic distances .
the strong interaction , the main focus of this review , is responsible for the existence of all composite elementary particles ( hadrons ) by providing the binding force between the constituents and also for most of the short lived hadron decays .
furthermore , the binding of protons and neutrons in nuclei may be explained in analogy to chemical binding of molecules based on the strong interaction of the proton and neutron constituents .
the constituents of hadrons are known as partons or quarks .
the known spectrum of hadrons can be explained as composites of five ( out of a total of six ) quark flavours , where each flavour occurs in three variants distinguished by the so - called colour . in table
[ tab_quarks ] the basic properties of the six known quarks are shown . .
basic properties of the six quarks in the standard model [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] jets originating from quarks or gluons should have different properties due to the different colour charge carried by quarks or gluons , see section [ sec_qg ] . in an analysis by delphi @xcite the scaling violation of the fragmentation function ( ff ) in gluon and quark jets at different energies is compared . from a sample of @xmath9 hadronic
@xmath1 decays planar 3-jet events with well reconstructed jets are selected using the durham or cambridge algorithms , but without imposing a fixed value of @xmath10 in order to reduce biases @xcite ( see section [ sec_excljets ] ) . in events with the two angles between the most energetic jet and the other jets in the range between 100@xmath11 and 170@xmath11 a b - tagging procedure is applied to the jets .
gluon jets are identified indirectly as the jets without a successful b - tag .
jets originating from light ( udsc ) quarks are taken from events which failed the b - tagging . a correction procedure based on efficiencies and purities determined by monte
carlo simulation yields results for pure gluon or quark jets .
the jet energy scale is calculated according to @xmath12 , where @xmath13 is the angle w.r.t . to the closest jet .
this definition takes colour coherence effects into account @xcite .
the ff in a jet @xmath14 is given by the distribution of @xmath15 for the hadrons assigned to the jet .
the evolution of the ffs of gluon and quark jets with jet energy scale @xmath16 is studied in intervals of @xmath17 .
figure [ fig_4jqgff ] ( right ) presents the quantity @xmath18 , i.e. the slopes of the scaling violation for a given interval of @xmath17 , for quark and gluon jets
. the steeper slopes corresponding to stronger scaling violations of gluon compared to quark jets are clearly visible .
a fit of the scaling violations based on the lo qcd prediction ( dglap equation ) allows to extract the ratio @xmath19 resulting in @xmath20 . in this analysis
@xcite the decomposition of the @xmath21+nlla qcd predictions for event shape observables into terms proportional to the colour factors is used . since the sensitivity of event shape distributions measured at lep 1 alone is not sufficient @xcite data from @xmath22 to 189 gev
are used . in this way
the colour structure of the running of the strong coupling contributes as well .
hadronisation corrections are implemented using power corrections , see section [ sec_powcor ] .
the advantage of using power corrections instead of monte carlo model based hadronisation corrections is that the colour structure of the power corrections is known and can be varied in the fit . in the analysis
simultaneous fits of @xmath5 , @xmath23 and @xmath24 to data for the event shape observables @xmath25 at @xmath22 to 189 gev and @xmath26at @xmath27 to 189 gev are performed . the data for @xmath25 and @xmath26are analysed separately and the results are combined .
the results are @xmath28 , @xmath29 and @xmath30 and are shown on figure [ fig_cacf ] below .
the errors are dominated by uncertainties from the hadronisation correction and from experimental effects .
the measurements of the colour factors @xmath23 and @xmath24 or of @xmath31 discussed above or in section [ sec_qg ] can be combined into average values of @xmath23 and @xmath24 taking into account correlations between @xmath23 and @xmath24 as well as between different experiments .
the variables @xmath32 and @xmath33 are used to define the @xmath34 function @xmath35 where @xmath36 and @xmath37 are the averages , the indices @xmath38 and @xmath39 count experiments , @xmath40 , @xmath41 and @xmath42 are elements of the inverses of the corresponding covariance matrices for the @xmath43 and @xmath44 within experiment @xmath38 and for the @xmath43 and @xmath44 between experiments .
the averages @xmath36 and @xmath37 are converted to the average values @xmath45 and @xmath46 after the fit is performed .
the input data for @xmath32 and @xmath47 are directly taken from @xcite while the results from @xcite have to be converted , @xmath48 , @xmath49 and @xmath50 . ] .
the covariance matrices between experiments are constructed as follows : the aleph and opal 4-jet analyses have experimental and hadronisation errors partially and theory errors fully correlated , the 4-jet analyses and the event shape analysis have hadronisation errors partially and theory errors fully correlated , and the 4-jet and event shape analyses and the delphi ff and the opal @xmath51 analyses have their theory errors partially correlated .
the averaging fit is done using only the first term of equation ( [ equ_covxy ] ) to determine the averages @xmath45 and @xmath46avoiding possible biases from our assumptions on correlations of systematic uncertainties between different sets of measurements .
the fit is repeated using only statistical correlations in the first term to determine the statistical errors and using the full covariance matrix to determine the total errors .
the final results are @xmath52 with correlation coefficient @xmath53 .
the relative total uncertainties are about 8% for both @xmath45 and @xmath46 .
the fit using the full covariance matrix yields @xmath54 and @xmath55 in good agreement with our main results .
figure [ fig_cacf ] presents the results of the individual analysis in a @xmath24 vs. @xmath23 plane together with the combined result and the expectations of qcd based on the su(3 ) gauge symmetry and various other gauge symmetries .
the correlation coefficients for @xcite were calculated from the references with the results @xmath56 ( aleph ) and @xmath57 ( opal ) .
the error ellipses refer to 90% cl .
the combined result is in good agreement with the individual analyses and with standard su(3 ) qcd while the total uncertainties are substantially reduced .
the other possibilities for gauge symmetries shown on the figure are clearly ruled out . and
@xmath24 discussed in this report .
the ellipses show the correlated measurements using 4-jet events @xcite or event shape distributions @xcite while the lines represent the results of determinations of @xmath19 from delphi @xcite ( dashed ) and opal @xcite ( solid ) .
the upper solid and dashed lines overlap .
the grey filled ellipsis displays the combined result for @xmath45 and @xmath46 ( see text ) . the solid triangle and squares show the expectations for various assumptions for the gauge symmetry of qcd as indicated on the figure .
, scaledwidth=75.0% ]
we have shown in this report that hadron production in @xmath0annihilation is a useful and fruitful environment to test the theory of strong interactions , qcd .
the absence of interference between initial and final states and the large range of cms energies probed by the experiments make many stringent tests of the theory possible .
the early results from hadron production in @xmath0 annihilation at low energies were crucial to establish qcd as the theory of strong interactions and thus as an integral part of the standard model of high energy physics .
studies of differences between quark and gluon jets reveal many properties of the gauge bosons of qcd , the gluons , which are correctly predicted by the theory .
the measurements of jet production rates and event shape observables using theoretically and experimentally well behaved observables allow direct tests of advanced perturbative qcd predictions and precise determinations of the value of the strong coupling constant @xmath58 .
a fundamental prediction by qcd is asymptotic freedom of the coupling at high energies and this has been verified directly using data over a large range of cms energies .
more indirect tests of asymptotic freedom stem from successful comparison of precision determinations of @xmath58 at different energy scales .
the most reliable and precise determinations of @xmath58 in @xmath0annihilation to hadrons employ inclusive observables such as the hadronic branching ratios of the gauge bosons of the electroweak theory , @xmath59 , @xmath1 and @xmath60 .
the inclusive observables are mostly unaffected by hadronisation corrections and they are accessible to nnlo perturbative qcd calculations with 2-loop radiative corrections . the final result for @xmath5 from inclusive observables calculated in nnlo perturbative qcd is @xmath61 this result is in good agreement with recent world averages of measurements of the strong coupling constant @xmath62 @xcite or @xmath63 @xcite which are based on all available analyses .
the best measurements of @xmath5 including ours shown above yield errors of about 2% .
the other determinations of @xmath58 discussed in this report are found to be in good agreement with our main result and we note that the results from analyses of the 4-jet rate using the durham or cambridge algorithms are of similar precision .
further improvements in the near future may be expected from nnlo calculations for 3-jet observables which are expected to reduce the otherwise dominating theoretical uncertainties and might allow total uncertainties of 1% @xcite .
studies of the gauge structure of qcd using angular correlations in 4-jet final states , 3-jet observables at different energy scales and quark and gluon jet differences were discussed .
the results for the colour factors @xmath23 and @xmath24 were observed to be in good agreement and combined values were calculated .
the results are @xmath64 with correlation @xmath53 .
these results are in good agreement with expectations from qcd with the su(3 ) gauge symmetry @xmath65 and @xmath66 . in summary ,
@xmath0 annihilation to hadrons has been and still is indispensable to stringently probe the theory of strong interactions .
qcd has been established as a part of the standard model of high energy physics and has been tested to a precision of 2% with some well suited observables .
this impressive result has been achieved by the lep experiments , sld , the re - analysis of jade data and the parallel theoretical work stimulated by the availability of precise data .
future high energy physics programmes such as the lhc or the ilc will benefit greatly from this achievement , because precise and reliable qcd predictions will be essential for disentangling possible new physics signals from standard processes .
100 kluth s 2003 in _ 2003 qcd and high energy hadronic interactions _ ed aug e and vn j t t pages 2530 ( the gioi publishers , vietnam ) contributed to xxxviiith recontre de moriond , qcd and high energy hadronic interactions , les arcs , france , march 2229 , 2003 | interactions between constituents matter described by four forces weak electromagnetic strong gravitational force weak strong interactions occur at to subatomic distances electromagnetic at subatomic to macroscopic gravitation at macroscopic distances strong interaction responsible for existence composite elementary particles hadrons binding force between constituents short lived hadron decays binding of protons neutrons in nuclei explained to chemical binding molecules strong interaction constituents of hadrons known as partons or quarks hadrons as composites of five six quark flavours each occurs in three variants distinguished by colour in table [ tab_quarks basic properties of six quarks shown standard model jets from quarks gluons different properties due to different colour charge analysis by delphi @xcite scaling violation of fragmentation function in gluon quark jets at different energies compared sample of @xmath9 hadronic @xmath1 decays planar 3-jet events with reconstructed jets selected using durham or cambridge algorithms without fixed value of @xmath10 to reduce biasesevents angles between energetic jet between 100 and 170@xmath11 b - tagging applied gluon jets identified without successful b - tag jets from light quarks taken from events failed b - tagging correction efficiencies purities monte carlo simulation yields results for pure gluon quark jets jet energy scale calculated @xmath12 @xmath13 angle to closest jet colour coherence ff in jet @xmath14 given by distribution of @xmath15 for hadrons evolution of ffs of gluon quark jets with energy scale @xmath16 studied in intervals of @xmath17 figure presents @xmath18 slopes scaling violation interval @xmath17 for quark gluon jets steeper slopes stronger scaling violations of gluon visible fit of scaling violations lo qcd prediction ratio @xmath19 in @xmath20 decomposition of @xmath21+nlla qcd predictions into terms proportional to colour factors used distributions data from @xmath22 to 189 gev used colour structure strong coupling contributes hadronisation corrections implemented using power correctionsadvantage using power corrections instead hadronisation colour structure known varied in simultaneous fits of @xmath5 @xmath23 @xmath24 to data event shape observables @xmath25 at to 189 @xmath26at to 189 gev performed data for analysed separately results combined results are @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 shown on figure_cacf errors dominated by uncertainties from hadronisation correction experimental effects measurements of colour factors @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath31 can combined into average values of correlations variables @xmath32 @xmath33 define @xmath34 function @xmath35 are averages indices @xmath38 @xmath39 count experiments @xmath40 @xmath42 are elements of inverses of covariance matrices for @xmath43 @xmath44 within between averages @xmath36 @xmath37 converted to average values @xmath45 @xmath46 after fit input data for @xmath32 @xmath47 taken from @xcite results from converted @xmath48 @xmath50covariance matrices between experiments constructed aleph opal 4-jet analyses experimental hadronisation partially theory fully correlated 4-jet event shape hadronisation partially theory fully correlated delphi opal @xmath51 theory errors partially correlated averaging fit first term equation averages @xmath45 @xmath46avoiding biases fit repeated using statistical correlations first term full covariance matrix total errors final results @xmath52 correlation coefficient @xmath53 total uncertainties 8% for @xmath45 @xmath46 fit full covariance matrix yields @xmath54 @xmath55 agreement with main results figure presents results @xmath24 vs. @xmath23 plane combined result expectations of qcd based su(3 ) gauge symmetry other symmetries correlation coefficients for @xcite calculated from references results @xmath56 @xmath57 error ellipses refer to 90% cl combined result with individual analyses standard su(3 ) qcd total uncertainties substantially reduced other possibilities for gauge symmetries ruled out @xmath24 discussedellipses show measurements 4-jet events shape distributions lines represent results determinations @xmath19 delphi opal upper solid dashed lines overlap grey ellipsis displays combined result @xmath45 @xmath46 solid triangle squares show expectations gauge symmetry qcd figure=75.0% hadron production in @xmath0annihilation useful test theory strong interactions absence interference initial final states large range of cms energies make stringent tests possible early results hadron production at low energies crucial qcd theory strong interactions integral part model high energy physics studies differences between quark gluon jets reveal properties gauge bosons qcd predicted by theory measurements jet production rates event shape observables observables allow tests perturbative qcd predictions precise determinations value strong coupling constant @xmath58 fundamental prediction qcd asymptotic freedom of coupling at high energies verified large range cms energies indirect tests freedom from precision determinations @xmath58 at different energy scales reliable determinations of @xmath58 in to hadrons employ inclusive observables hadronic branching ratios bosons @xmath59 @xmath1 @xmath60inclusive observables unaffected by hadronisation corrections accessible to nnlo perturbative qcd calculations with 2-loop radiative corrections final result for @xmath5 is @xmath61 with averages strong coupling constant @xmath62 best measurements of @xmath5 yield errors about 2% determinations of @xmath58 with main result results 4-jet rate similar precision improvements from nnlo calculations for 3-jet observables reduce theoretical uncertainties allow total uncertainties 1% @xcite studies of gauge structure of qcd using angular correlations in 4-jet final states 3-jet observables energy scales quark gluon jet differences discussed results for colour factors @xmath23 @xmath24 good agreement combined values calculated results @xmath64 with correlation @xmath53 with qcd su(3 gauge symmetry @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath0 annihilation to hadrons indispensable to theory strong interactions qcd established standard model high energy physics tested to precision 2% with observables result achieved by lep experiments sld re - analysis of jade data parallel theoretical workhigh energy physics programmes lhc ilc benefit achievement precise qcd predictions disentangling new physics signals processes 2003 qcd high energy hadronic interactions pages 2530 gioi publishers vietnam contributed xxxviiith recontre moriond qcd high energy hadronic interactions arcs france march 2229 | 0.431642 | 2,724 | 1,346 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,345 | in this paper we study a quantum field theoretical approach , where a quantum probe is used to investigate the properties of generic non - flat frlw space time .
the fluctuations related to a massless conformal coupled scalar field defined on a space - time with horizon is identified with a probe and the procedure to measure the local temperature is presented . | the hawking radiation @xcite is one of the most robust and important predictions of quantum field theory in curved space - time .
here we would like to study some ( local ) properties of a generic friedmann - lemaitre - robertson - walker ( flrw ) space - time with non - flat topology .
let us remind some basic facts about the formalism .
any spherically symmetric four dimensional metric can be expressed in the form : @xmath0 with @xmath1 a tensor describing a two - dimensional space - time with coordinates @xmath2 , @xmath3 being the `` areal radius '' and @xmath4 encoding the metric of a two - dimensional sphere orthogonal respect to the first one . the dynamical trapping horizon -if exists- is located in the correspondence of @xmath5 thus , one may define the quasi - local misner - sharp gravitational energy as @xmath6\,.\ ] ] for example , the mass of a black hole described by this formalism results to be @xmath7 .
the killing vector fields @xmath8 are the generators of the isometries with @xmath9 : in the static case , with the time - like killing vector field @xmath10 , the killing surface gravity @xmath11 is given by @xmath12 in the dynamical case , the real geometric object which generalizes the killing vector field is the kodama vector field @xcite , @xmath13 thus , the hayward surface gravity associated with dynamical horizon is @xcite @xmath14 the hawking radiation is a thermal radiation of the black holes due to quantum effects . in the static case , all derivations of hawking radiation lead to a semi - classical expression for the radiation rate @xmath15 in terms of the exchange @xmath16 of the killing energy @xmath17 and the killing / hawking temperature @xmath18 , @xmath19 in the dynamical case
one may suggest the kodama / hayward temperature : @xmath20 an important example that demonstrates the covariance of the formalism is given by the de sitter space - time .
the static patch reads @xmath21 where @xmath22 and the horizon is located at @xmath23 with surface gravity @xmath24 .
the second patch is given by the expanding coordinates of the flat flrw metric , @xmath25 where @xmath26 and the dynamical ( cosmological ) horizon is @xmath23 with @xmath24 .
finally , the global patch in non - flat flrw metric is given by @xmath27 with @xmath28 , and @xmath23 and @xmath24 again .
now we will see how it is possible to associate a temperature to the dynamical horizon of flat and non - flat de sitter space - time in ( [ flat])([global ] ) .
we recall the quantization of a conformal coupled massless scalar field in the frlw space - time .
the metric reads @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the conformal time , @xmath31 is a mass scale and the topology of the spacial section can be flat , spherically or hyperbolic for @xmath32 , respectively . given a massless scalar field , @xmath33 such that the modes are conformal invariant , namely @xmath34 , the associated wightman function @xmath35 results to be @xmath36 the wightman function satisfies the following rule for the conformal transformations of the metric : @xmath37 we may also take @xmath38 due to the homogeneity and isotropy of flrw space - times .
let us consider the spherical case ( @xmath39 ) in ( [ metric ] ) , @xmath40 this metric is conformally related to the minkowski space - time , @xmath41 with @xmath42 thus , by starting from the well - known wightman function in minkowski space - time , one can use ( [ conf ] ) and derive for the spherical flrw metric @xmath43 the hyperbolic case @xmath44 is obtained with the substitution @xmath45 , while the flat case @xmath46 corresponds to the limit @xmath47 .
let us consider a free massless quantum scalar field @xmath48 in thermal equilibrium at the temperature @xmath49 in flat space - time . we know
that finite temperature field theory effects of this kind can be investigated by given that the scalar field defined in the euclidean manifold @xmath50 , where the imaginary time is @xmath51 , compactified in the circle @xmath52 with period @xmath53 .
we briefly review the local quantity @xmath54 , which is a divergent quantity due to the product of valued operator distribution in the same point @xmath55 . by making use of the zeta - function regularization procedure ,
the quantum fluctuations read @xcite : @xmath56 where @xmath57 is the local zeta - function associated with the operator @xmath58 .
it is easy to see that the analytic continuation of the local zeta - function is regular at @xmath59 and finally one gets @xmath60 in this way we obtain the temperature of the quantum field in thermal equilibrium from the zeta - function renormalized vacuum expectation value , namely we have a quantum thermometer .
now we extend the argument to generic flrw metric .
the off - diagonal wightman function ( [ wsph ] ) leads to @xmath61 with @xmath62 where @xmath63 is the conformal factor .
thus , in the limit @xmath64 , one has @xmath65 it is possible to show that @xmath66 where @xmath67 the dot being the derivative respect to the proper time , @xmath68 being the usual hubble parameter , and @xmath69 the radial acceleration .
therefore , after the regularization for the divergent part at @xmath70 , @xmath71 this result is quite general and it is valid also for spatial curvature @xmath72 . in the case of de sitter space - time with @xmath39 , we may put @xmath73 and the expression for quantum fluctuations reads @xmath74 where @xmath75 is the areal radius of the kodama observer and the acceleration has been computed as @xmath76 for a kodama observer with @xmath77 we recover the gibbons - hawking temperature associated with de sitter space - time , @xmath78 this is an important check of our approach , since it shows the coordinate independence of the result for the important case of de sitter space - time . the minkowski space - time
may be written in a frlw form with hyperbolic section @xmath44 ( milne universe ) , @xmath79 making use of the hayward formalism , it is easy to verify that there is no dynamical horizon and the surface gravity is vanishing . in this case
we obtain @xmath80 namely only the radial acceleration @xmath69 is present and the temperature is defined as @xmath81 recovering the well known unruh effect .
this proceeding is based on the paper @xcite .
i thank sergio zerbini for helpful discussions . | hawking radiation @xcite robust quantum field theory curved space - time study local properties friedmann - lemaitre - robertson - walker space - time non - flat topology facts formalism spherically symmetric four dimensional metric expressed @xmath0 @xmath1 tensor two - dimensional space - time coordinates @xmath2 @xmath3 areal radius @xmath4 metric two - dimensional sphere dynamical trapping horizon correspondence @xmath5 quasi - local - gravitational energy as @xmath6 mass black hole @xmath7 killing vector fields @xmath8 generators isometries @xmath9 killing surface gravity @xmath11 by @xmath12 dynamical case geometric object killing vector field kodama vector field @xcite @xmath13 hayward surface gravity dynamical horizon @xcite @xmath14 hawking radiation thermal radiation black holes due quantum effectsstatic case derivations hawking radiation semi - classical expression radiation rate @xmath15 exchange killing energy killing hawking temperature dynamical case kodama hayward temperature @xmath20 example covariance formalism de sitter space - time static patch @xmath21 horizon @xmath23 surface gravity @xmath24 second patch expanding coordinates flat flrw metric @xmath25 dynamical horizon @xmath23 @xmath24 global patch non - flat flrw metric @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath23 associate temperature dynamical horizon flat non - flat de sitter space - time quantization conformal coupled massless scalar field frlw space - time metric reads @xmath29 @xmath30 conformal time @xmath31 mass scale topology spacial section flat spherically hyperbolic @xmath32 massless scalar field @xmath33 modes conformal invariant @xmath34 wightman function @xmath35 @xmath36 wightman function satisfies rule conformal transformations metric @xmath37 @xmath38 homogeneity isotropy flrw space - timesconsider spherical case @xmath39 metric @xmath40 related minkowski space - time @xmath41 starting wightman function minkowski time spherical flrw metric @xmath43 hyperbolic case @xmath44 substitution @xmath45 flat case @xmath46 limit @xmath47 consider free massless quantum scalar field @xmath48 thermal equilibrium temperature @xmath49 flat space - time finite temperature field theory effects scalar field euclidean manifold @xmath50 imaginary time @xmath51 circle @xmath52 period @xmath53 review local quantity @xmath54 divergent quantity valued operator distribution point @xmath55 zeta - function regularization procedure quantum fluctuations read @xmath56 @xmath57 local zeta - function operator @xmath58 continuation local zeta - function regular @xmath59 @xmath60 obtain temperature quantum field thermal equilibrium zeta - function renormalized vacuum expectation value quantum thermometer extend argument generic flrw metric off - diagonal wightman function leads @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 conformal factorlimit @xmath64 @xmath65 show @xmath66 @xmath67 dot derivative time @xmath68 hubble parameter @xmath69 radial acceleration regularization divergent part @xmath70 @xmath71 result general valid spatial curvature @xmath72 de sitter space - time @xmath39 @xmath73 expression quantum fluctuations @xmath74 @xmath75 areal radius kodama observer acceleration computed @xmath76 kodama observer @xmath77 recover - temperature de sitter space - time @xmath78 important check shows coordinate independence result de sitter space - time minkowski space - time written frlw form hyperbolic section @xmath44 @xmath79 hayward formalism verify no dynamical horizon surface gravity vanishing obtain @xmath80 radial acceleration @xmath69 temperature defined @xmath81 recovering unruh effect proceeding based paper @xcite thank sergio zerbini discussions | 0.261281 | 1,536 | 824 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,362 | we image the micro - electroluminescence ( el ) spectra of self - assembled inas quantum dots ( qds ) embedded in the intrinsic region of a gaas _ p - i - n _ diode and demonstrate optical detection of resonant carrier injection into a single qd .
resonant tunneling of electrons and holes into the qds at bias voltages below the flat - band condition leads to sharp el lines characteristic of individual qds , accompanied by a spatial fragmentation of the surface el emission into small and discrete light - emitting areas , each with its own spectral fingerprint and stark shift .
we explain this behavior in terms of coulomb interaction effects and the selective excitation of a small number of qds within the ensemble due to preferential resonant tunneling paths for carriers .
self - assembled inas quantum dots ( qds ) are an important model system for investigating the fundamental physics of quantum - confined electrons @xcite .
the selective light emission from a small number of qds can be achieved , for example , by lithographically defined small - area diodes @xcite or apertures @xcite , or by the incorporation of qds into microcavities @xcite and nanowires @xcite .
such studies have provided information about the electronic properties of the dots and form the basis for novel applications , e.g. optically @xcite and electrically @xcite driven sources of entangled photon pairs for quantum information processing .
of particular interest is the possibility of generating sharp el emission lines from individual qds by voltage controlled electrical injection of carriers . despite many works on resonant tunneling injection of carriers in unipolar qd devices @xcite
, the simultaneous resonant injection of both electrons and holes required for el emission from an individual qd has received less attention @xcite and is relevant to topical research on electrically driven single qd photon emitters @xcite .
here we use micro - electroluminescence ( @xmath0el ) spectroscopy and imaging to investigate the optical emission from a single layer of self - assembled inas quantum dots embedded in the intrinsic region of a _
p - i - n _ light emitting diode . by gradually decreasing the applied bias below
the ` flat band ' threshold voltage at which the bias balances the built - in potential in the @xmath1-region , we follow the evolution of the el spectra and the corresponding spatial form of the el emission .
we show that resonant tunneling of electrons and holes into the qds at bias voltages below the flat band condition leads to sharp el lines which are characteristic of individual qds , accompanied by a spatial fragmentation of the diode emission into small and discrete light - emitting areas , each with its own spectral fingerprint and stark shift .
we explain this behavior in terms of the selective excitation of a small number of qds within the ensemble due to the presence of preferential resonant tunneling paths for carriers .
we also discuss the effect of qd charging and coulomb interactions on the resonant excitation of the single qd el emission .
this demonstration of bias - controlled excitation of el from an individual qd within an ensemble of dots could be developed further for use in optoelectronic or quantum information applications .
our _ p - i - n _ diodes were grown by molecular beam epitaxy on a @xmath2 gaas substrate , which forms the bottom electrical contact of the diode . the layer structure in order of growth on the substrate is as follows : @xmath3 nm and @xmath4 nm p - doped gaas layer with @xmath5@xmath6 and @xmath7@xmath6 , respectively ; a @xmath8 nm intrinsic gaas spacer layer ; a @xmath9 monolayer ( ml ) of inas , which gives rise to a wetting layer ( wl ) and qds with a density of about @xmath10@xmath11 .
the qd layer is covered by @xmath12 nm of intrinsic gaas followed by @xmath4 nm n - doped gaas ( @xmath13@xmath6 ) and a @xmath14 nm gaas top layer with @xmath15@xmath6 .
the diodes are defined by wet - chemical etching and a ring - shaped gold electrode forms the top electrical contact and provides optical access . here
we focus on large area devices with @xmath16 m diameter , containing @xmath17 qds .
a schematic band diagram for a bias @xmath18 below the flat band condition , i.e. for @xmath19v , is shown in the inset of fig . 1a . the @xmath0el spectra were recorded at @xmath20k with a spectral resolution of @xmath21ev and a focal spot diameter of about @xmath22 m .
the spatial maps of the @xmath0el were recorded by scanning the focusing mirror along the mesa . .
inset : schematic diagram of the resonant injection of electrons and holes into a qd .
( b ) colorscale image of the normalized el intensity as a function of photon energy and bias .
the dashed lines represent the conditions @xmath23 , @xmath24mev and @xmath25mev .
( c ) and ( d ) @xmath0el spectra showing the fragmentation of the continuous el spectrum into a sharp emission line.,title="fig : " ] figure 1(a ) shows the el spectra for a range of applied biases @xmath18 .
as @xmath18 is decreased below the flat band condition , the el spectrum narrows and evolves into single sharp el lines . to track the evolution of the el spectrum with @xmath18 , we show in fig .
1(b ) a color - scale plot of the normalized el intensity versus @xmath18 and the photon energy , @xmath26 .
this reveals clearly the narrowing of the qd emission with decreasing bias and the emergence of two distinct el features , labeled a and b and indicated in fig .
1b by dashed lines .
a and b both shift to lower energies with decreasing bias with peak energies that run parallel to the line @xmath23 .
the energy difference between the excitation energy @xmath27 and the peak energy of each feature is @xmath28mev and @xmath29mev , respectively .
this indicates that electron - hole pairs electrically injected into different qds relax approximatively the same energy prior to the radiative recombination in the ground state .
we now focus on the @xmath0el spectra in the energy interval @xmath30ev at low applied bias .
figure 1c and 1d show the @xmath0el spectrum at a given position on the mesa at different @xmath18 .
with decreasing @xmath18 the spectrum evolves from a broad continuous emission into a fragmented spectrum . at @xmath31v
the emission consists of a single sharp line only , with a full width at half maximum of @xmath32ev .
this linewidth is not determined by the resolution of the spectrometer and is similar to the typical linewidths reported for the low temperature photoluminescence emission of individual inas qds @xcite .
this method of el excitation allows the study of such sharp emission lines over several orders of magnitudes in intensity and also reveals a characteristic exponential acoustic phonon broadening and a weak but sharp phonon replica peak , which are reported elsewhere @xcite .
the fragmentation of the el spectrum into sharp lines is accompanied by a spatial fragmentation of the el emission . to demonstrate this effect
, we recorded @xmath0el spectra at each position of a square grid covering roughly @xmath33 of the diode surface .
figure 2 shows spatial maps of the maximum intensity of each spectrum as a function of position for a series of bias voltages . for each image
, a scale factor relates the maximum of the colorscale to the maximum at @xmath34v . at @xmath34v
the emission is essentially homogeneous across the scan @xcite .
at a slightly lower bias , @xmath35v , the diode emission starts to break up into a series of bright spots dominating over a homogeneous background emission . at @xmath36v , the background intensity weakens and several bright spots emerge at distinct positions with a uniform spot size determined by the diameter of the focal spot of the collecting lens . at this voltage the el spectra fragment into sharp lines . at @xmath37v ,
the number of bright spots decreases and the relative intensities of the individual spots change compared to the image at @xmath36v .
the spectra now consist of individual emission lines with no background el . at @xmath38v ,
the maximum intensities are much lower and the number of visible emission spots is reduced to four . at @xmath31v , only one bright spot is visible and the corresponding spectrum , shown in fig .
1d , consists of a single sharp emission line with an intensity similar to the maximum at @xmath37v .
we note that no other el lines could be observed at this bias , suggesting that this emission center originates from a single qd .
el intensity for a range of applied biases . for a given bias
the el spectrum is recorded for a grid of positions .
the images show the maximum intensity of each spectrum as a function of the position on the diode .
the number at the bottom right of each image denotes the factor by which the el intensity is scaled compared to the first image.,title="fig : " ] el intensity maps at different photon energies , given by arrows of the same color in ( b ) .
the symbols p1-p7 mark the position of the maximum el intensity at this energy .
features with intensities below the threshold of 10% of the maximum in a scan are omitted for clarity .
( b ) el spectra recorded for @xmath37v at the positions p1-p7 given in ( a ) .
the el spectra are offset for clarity.,title="fig : " ] the el spectra corresponding to the spatial el maps are presented in fig .
3 for @xmath37v .
figure 3a shows maps of the normalized el intensity as a function of position at specific photon energies .
the individual scans are distinguished by different colors and the corresponding energies are indicated by arrows in the @xmath0el spectra of fig .
3b . the bright spots in fig .
3a and the corresponding el spectra of fig .
3b are labeled as p1-p7 .
each spot has approximately the same size and circular shape as the one that gives rise to the sharp el emission in fig .
1d and has a unique spectral fingerprint consisting of a small number of sharp lines . in turn
, each emission line originates from exactly one bright spot in the spatial scans @xcite .
these observations are consistent with the selective excitation of a small number of dots by carriers tunneling in the diode area of the bright spots .
figure 4a shows the bias dependence of the peak intensity of the emission line l1 of fig .
1d at the energy @xmath39ev .
the el intensity exhibits sharp peaks at bias voltages of @xmath40v and @xmath41v .
these resonances are a clear manifestation of the voltage - tunable resonant tunneling excitation of a single qd detected by optical means .
the resonant injection of carriers from the doped contact layers into discrete excited states of the qd is followed by energy relaxation of the carriers into the ground state and radiative recombination .
the two bias resonances are separated in energy by @xmath42mev and the differences from the ground state are @xmath43mev and @xmath44mev , both typical values for the quantum confinement energies of self - assembled inas qds . at large biases ( @xmath45v )
the strong growth of the el intensity arises from an increasing contribution of the emission from the qd ensemble , which is excited through carrier injection and redistribution into the extended states of the wetting layer and of the gaas matrix as the flat band condition is approached @xcite .
we find resonances on many other el lines in this spectral range , though the number of observed resonances and their amplitudes can differ , as shown for the lines l4 and l5 in fig .
4a .
the emission energy of individual el lines depends on the applied bias , as can be seen in fig . 4b , where the energy shift @xmath46 relative to the value at @xmath47v is plotted for several lines l1-l5 .
we attribute this bias dependence to the quantum - confined stark effect in the qd @xcite .
of particular interest is that the energies of some of the lines remain constant over certain bias ranges .
for example , the l1 line does not shift between @xmath48v and @xmath49v , suggesting that the electric field in the intrinsic region remains constant .
we propose that resonant tunneling gives rise to an increase in the average charge density in the qd layer , thus screening the local electric field , an effect analogous to the charge build - up effect reported previously for resonant tunneling quantum well diodes @xcite .
also note that , although the stark shifts for various el lines differ from each other , the rates of shift with bias are very similar .
this indicates that the different bias dependences arise from mesoscopic variations of the potential landscape rather than from differences in the electronic properties of the qds .
our data demonstrate that at low temperatures the qd el below the flat band condition is excited by resonant tunneling injection of carriers .
the electrons and holes in the doped @xmath50- and @xmath51-type layers adjacent to the @xmath1-region of the diode have an energy spread given by the respective fermi energies ( @xmath52mev ) .
since both the electron and hole states have to be aligned with the fermi seas to resonantly excite el , one would expect considerably narrower bias resonances than the ones reported here . on the other hand
, the coulomb interaction of a charged qd with the fermi seas of the contacts and with its nearest neighbor qds can provide additional tunneling pathways , thus accounting for the relatively large widths ( @xmath53mv ) of the resonances in fig .
4a .
we note that this broadening is significantly larger than the width of individual qd el lines ( @xmath32ev ) . though the number of active qds is constrained by the conditions of resonant tunneling , this constraint is not sufficient to explain the pronounced spectral and spatial fragmentation of the el emission revealed in our study .
existing theoretical models @xcite do not predict such an effect either .
the high density and uniform distribution of qds ensures that even at the lowest bias several dots could be active .
hence we conclude that some qds are coupled more strongly to the reservoirs than others , which is supported by the different number of observable resonances for different qds shown in fig .
4a .
since the emission energies of the investigated qds are very similar , this variation of the coupling is likely to be due to local variations of the tunnel distance and barrier height . in previous studies , @xmath0el maps of the emission from the ridge - waveguide regions of ingan quantum well
based leds have revealed spatial inhomogeneities due to non - uniform carrier injection caused by crystal degradation @xcite . in our diodes , the el spectra are stable with time , but preferential tunneling paths may arise from mesoscopic fluctuations of the @xmath50- and @xmath51-doped interfaces due to randomly placed dopant atoms in or close to the intrinsic region , crystals defects or strain - related potential minima associated with the qds themselves .
such variations would not only explain the spatial and spectral fragmentation of the el spectra , but could also account for some differences in the bias dependence of the stark shifts among various qds . in summary ,
we have demonstrated how the homogeneous broad band emission of a large quantum dot ensemble fragments into spatially strongly inhomogeneous sharp emission lines from individual quantum dots .
each el line exhibits a distinct resonance behavior as a function of the applied bias and a unique stark shift .
these effects can be explained in terms of the selective excitation of a small number of qds within the ensemble due to the presence of preferential resonant tunneling paths for carriers .
our results provide direct evidence for the resonant and voltage tunable electrical injection of carriers into individual qds and are relevant for future implementation of such structures into electrically controlled single photon leds .
in particular , the resonant tunneling excitation of a single dot could reduce quantum decoherence due to interactions with carriers occupying adjacent dots or higher energy continuum states . | this work is supported by the engineering and physical sciences research council ( uk ) and the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft in the frame of sfb 787 . | work supported engineering physical sciences research council deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft sfb 787 | 0.064316 | 34 | 19 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,373 | the @xmath0 data for deuteron inclusive breakup off hydrogen and carbon at a deuteron momentum of 9.0 gev / c and large @xmath1 of emitted protons are presented .
the large values of @xmath0 independent of the target mass reflect the sensitivity of the data to the deuteron spin structure .
the data obtained at fixed @xmath2 and plotted versus @xmath3 clearly demonstrate the dependence of the deuteron spin structure at short internucleonic distances on two variables .
the data are compared with the calculations using paris , cd - bonn and karmanov s deuteron wave functions . * tensor analyzing power @xmath0 in deuteron inclusive breakup at large @xmath3 and spin structure of deuteron at short internucleonic distances.@xmath4 * v.p.ladygin , l.s .
azhgirey , s.v .
afanasiev , v.v .
arkhipov , v.k .
bondarev , yu.t .
borzounov , l.b .
golovanov , a.yu .
isupov , a.a .
kartamyshev , v.a .
kashirin , a.n .
khrenov , v.i .
kolesnikov , v.a .
kuznezov , a.g .
litvinenko , s.g .
reznikov , p.a .
rukoyatkin , a.yu .
semenov , i.a .
semenova , g.d .
stoletov , a.p .
tzvinev , v.n .
zhmyrov and l.s .
zolin _ joint institute for nuclear researches , 141980 dubna , russia _
g.filipov + _ institute of nuclear research and nuclear energy , 1784 sofia , bulgaria _ n.p .
yudin + _ moscow state university , 117234 moscow , russia _ | the interest to the @xmath5 reaction at relativistic energies is mostly due to the possibility to observe the manifestation of the non - nucleonic degrees of freedom and relativistic effects in the simplest bounded system .
large amount of the polarization data in deuteron breakup obtained at a zero degree last years can be interpreted from the point of view @xmath6 configurations in the deuteron , where relativistic effects are taken into account by the minimal relativization scheme with the dependence of the deuteron structure on single variable @xmath7 .
in addition the considering of multiple scattering is required to obtain the agreement with the data@xcite . on the other hand , it was shown that @xmath8 data for the pion - free deuteron breakup process @xmath9 in the kinematical region close to that of backward elastic @xmath10 scattering depended on the incident deuteron momentum in addition to @xmath7@xcite .
the recent measurements of the tensor analyzing power @xmath0 of deuteron inclusive breakup on nuclear targets @xcite have demonstrated a significant dependence on the transverse secondary proton momentum @xmath11 being plotted at a fixed value of the longitudinal proton momentum .
this forces one to suggest that description of this quantity requires an additional independent variable , aside from @xmath7 . in this report
the angular dependence of @xmath0 in deuteron inclusive breakup on hydrogen and carbon at 9 gev / c are presented .
the results are compared with the relativistic calculations using paris , cd - bonn and karmanov s deuteron wave functions ( dwfs ) .
the experiment has been performed using a tensorially polarized deuteron beam of the dubna synchrophasotron and the sphere setup described elsewhere @xcite .
the tensor polarization of the beam has been measured from the asymmetry of protons from the deuteron breakup on nuclear targets , @xmath12 , at a zero angle and the momenta @xmath13 @xcite .
the vector polarization of the beam has been measured from the asymmetry of quasi - elastic @xmath14 scattering on @xmath15 target @xcite .
the tensor and vector polarizations , @xmath16 and @xmath17 , were @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 , respectively .
a slowly extracted deuteron beam with a typical intensity of @xmath22 @xmath23/spill was directed onto a liquid hydrogen target of 30 cm length or onto carbon targets with varied length .
the data at 9 gev / c of the deuteron initial momentum were obtained at secondary proton emission angles of 85 , 130 and 160 mr and proton momenta between 4.5 and 7.0 gev / c on hydrogen and carbon .
the separation of the protons and inelastically scattered deuterons was done by the measurements of their time - of - flight ( tof ) over a base line of @xmath24 m. the residual background was completely eliminated by the requirement that particles are detected at least in two prompt tof windows .
the results on @xmath0 versus the momentum of the secondary protons are presented in fig .
[ fig1 ] by the solid and open symbols for carbon and hydrogen targets , respectively .
the circles are the data of this experiment , while the triangles represent the data obtained earlier@xcite .
the dashed , dash - dotted and solid lines are the relativistic calculations using paris@xcite , cd - bonn@xcite and karmanov@xcite dwfs . the calculations performed in the framework of the light - front dynamics @xcite with the use of paris and cd - bonn dwfs fail to reproduce the @xmath0 data , while the use of karmanov dwf depending on two internal variables , @xmath7 and @xmath1 , is in a reasonable agreement with the data obtained at 85 mr .
@xmath0 data obtained at fixed proton momenta of 6.0 , 6.5 and 7.0 gev / c are plotted versus transverse proton momenta @xmath1 .
the symbols and curves are the same as in fig.[fig1 ] . again
the use of dwf depending on two variables@xcite gives better agreement with the data . | interest to @xmath5 reaction at relativistic energies due to non - nucleonic degrees freedom relativistic effects in bounded system polarization data in deuteron breakup at zero degree interpreted from @xmath6 configurations deuteron relativistic effects minimal relativization scheme dependence structure on single variable multiple scattering required agreement with data@xcite @xmath8 data for pion - free deuteron breakup elastic scattering depended on deuteron momentum recent measurements of tensor analyzing power deuteron breakup on nuclear targets significant dependence on transverse secondary proton momentum longitudinal proton description quantity requires additional independent variable angular dependence of @xmath0 deuteron breakup on hydrogen carbon at 9 gev / c presented results compared with relativistic calculations using paris cd - bonn karmanov s deuteron wave functions experiment performed using tensorially polarized deuteron beam dubna synchrophasotron sphere setup tensor polarization measured from asymmetry of protons from deuteron breakup on nuclear targets at zero angle @xmath13vector polarization beam measured from asymmetry @xmath14 scattering on @xmath15 target tensor vector polarizations @xmath16 were extracted deuteron beam intensity @xmath22 @xmath23 directed liquid hydrogen target 30 cm length carbon targets varied length data at 9 gev / c deuteron momentum obtained at secondary proton emission angles 85 130 160 mr proton momenta 4.5 7.0 gev / c on hydrogen carbon separation protons scattered deuterons time - of - flight over base line @xmath24 m residual background eliminated by particles in two tof windows results on @xmath0 versus momentum secondary protons presented in fig . solid symbols for carbon hydrogen targets circles data experiment triangles data dashed solid lines relativistic calculations using paris@xcite cd - bonn@xcite karmanov@xcite dwfs calculations light - front dynamics paris cd - bonn dwfs reproduce @xmath0 data karmanov dwf with data at 85 mr data fixed proton momenta 6.0 6.5 7.0 gev / c plotted versus transverse proton momenta symbols curves same fig. use dwf two variables agreement data | 0.177233 | 909 | 436 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,377 | predictions of the ccfm evolution equation for @xmath0 and forward jets at hera energies are obtained from a modified version of the monte carlo program smallx .
the treatment of the non - sudakov form factor @xmath1 is discussed as well as the effect of the so called consistency constraint " . for the first time a good description of @xmath0 and the forward jet data is obtained from the ccfm equation . | the parton evolution at small values of @xmath2 is believed to be best described by the ccfm evolution equation , which for @xmath3 is equivalent to the bfkl evolution equation and for large @xmath2 reproduce the standard dglap equations .
the ccfm evolution equation takes coherence effects of the radiated gluons into account via angular ordering . on the basis of this evolution equation
, the monte carlo program smallx has been developed already in 1992 . in 1997
the linked dipole chain was developed as a reformulation of the original ccfm equation .
predictions of the ccfm equation for hadronic final state properties were studied in @xcite paying special attention to non - leading effects .
all approaches found a good description of @xmath0 but failed completely to describe the forward jet data of hera experiments , which are believed to be a signature for new small @xmath2 parton dynamics . in the following
i discuss the treatment of the non - sudakov form factor @xmath1 as well as the effects of the so - called consistency constraint " , which was found to be necessary to include non - leading contributions to the bfkl equation @xcite .
i show that a good description of @xmath0 and the forward jet data can be achieved .
the implementation of the ccfm parton evolution in the forward evolution monte carlo program smallx is described in detail in .
here i only concentrate on the basic ideas and discuss the treatment of the non - sudakov form factor .
the initial state gluon cascade is generated in a forward evolution approach from a starting distribution of the @xmath4 unintegrated gluon distribution according to : @xmath5 where @xmath6 is a normalization constant and @xmath7 gev@xmath8 .
gluons then can branch into a virtual ( @xmath9-channel ) gluon @xmath10 and a final gluon @xmath11 according to the ccfm splitting function : @xmath12 with @xmath13 being the rescaled transverse momentum , @xmath14 , @xmath15 being a collinear cutoff to avoid the @xmath16 singularity and @xmath17 being the sudakov form factor : @xmath18 which at an inclusive level cancels against the @xmath16 collinear singularity and is used to generate @xmath19 .
the gluon splitting function @xmath20 is given by : @xmath21 with the non - sudakov form factor @xmath1 being defined as : @xmath22 which gives for the region @xmath23 : @xmath24 the constraint @xmath23 is often referred to as the consistency constraint " @xcite .
however the upper limit of the @xmath25 integral is constraint by the @xmath26 functions in eq.([ns ] ) by : @xmath27 , which results in the following form of the non - sudakov form factor @xcite : @xmath28 where @xmath29 giving no supression in the region @xmath30 we have @xmath31 .
the monte carlo program smallx has been modified to include the non - sudakov form factor according to eq.([ns_new ] ) and the scale in @xmath32 was changed to @xmath33 in the cascade and in the matrix element . to avoid problems at small @xmath34 , @xmath35
is restricted to @xmath36 .
the consistency constraint " was introduced to account for next - to - leading effects in the bfkl equation , and which was found @xcite to simulate about 70% of the full next - to - leading corrections to the bfkl equation . since in lo bfkl the true kinematics of the branchings are neglected , they can be interpreted as next - to - leading effects , and this constraint is often also called kinematic constraint " . in the ccfm equation energy and momentum conservation is already included at lo , and it is not clear , whether the arguments coming from bfkl also apply to ccfm . in the following the effects of the @xmath16 terms and the consistency constraint " are studied in more detail .
with the modifications on the treatment of the non - sudakov form factors described above , the predictions of the ccfm evolution equation , as implemented in the program smallx , for the structure function @xmath37 are shown in fig .
[ f2_1 ] without applying any additional consistency constraint " .
-15 mm -10 mm here the following parameters were used : @xmath38 gev , @xmath39 gev , @xmath40 and the masses for light ( charm ) quarks were set to @xmath41 gev .
the scale of @xmath32 in the off - shell matrix element was set to @xmath34 . with this parameter settings
are very good description of @xmath0 over the range @xmath42 and @xmath43 gev@xmath8 is obtained . in fig .
[ fwd_jets_1 ] the prediction for the forward jets using the same parameter setting is shown .
the data are nicely described .
-12 mm -8 mm the effect of the @xmath16 term in the splitting function is shown in figs .
[ f2_1 ] and [ fwd_jets_1 ] separately with the dashed line .
it is obvious that these terms are important for a reasonable description of @xmath0 and the forward jet data .
including the consistency constraint " the @xmath2 dependence of the cross section changes , but a similarly good description of @xmath0 is obtained by changing @xmath44 to @xmath45 gev .
however the forward jet cross section becomes smaller , as shown with the dotted line in figs .
[ f2_1 ] and [ fwd_jets_1 ] .
it is interesting to note , that this prediction is very similar to the one obtained from the bfkl equation as shown in @xcite for @xmath34 as the scale in @xmath32 .
i am very grateful to b. webber for providing me with the code of smallx .
i am grateful to b. andersson , g. gustafson , h. kharraziha , j. kwiecinski , l. lnnblad , a. martin , s. munier , r. peschanski and g. salam for many very helpful discussions about ccfm .
10 m. ciafaloni , _ nucl . phys .
* b * _ * 296 * ( 1988 ) 49 + s. catani , f. fiorani , g. marchesini , _ phys . lett .
* b * _ * 234 * ( 1990 ) 339 and _ nucl . phys . * b * _ * 336 * ( 1990 ) 18 + g. marchesini , _ nucl . phys . * b * _ * 445 * ( 1995 ) 49 .
e. kuraev , l. lipatov , v. fadin , _ sov .
* 44 * ( 1976 ) 443 and _ sov .
. jetp _ * 45 * ( 1977 ) 199 + y. balitskii , l. lipatov , _ sov .
_ * 28 * ( 1978 ) 822 .
g. marchesini , b. webber , _ nucl . phys .
* b * _ * 349 * ( 1991 ) 617 and _ nucl . phys . *
b * _ * 386 * ( 1992 ) 215 .
b. andersson , g. gustafson , j. samuelsson , _ nucl .
* b * _ * 467 * ( 1996 ) 443 + b. andersson , g. gustafson , h. kharraziha , j. samuelsson , _ z. phys .
* c * _ * 71 * ( 1996 ) 613 + g. gustafson , h. kharraziha , l. lnnblad , _ jhep _ * 98003:006 * ( 1998 ) .
g. bottazi , g. marchesini , g. salam , m. scorletti , _ jhep _ * 9812:11 * ( 1998 ) , hep - ph/9810546 .
j. kwiecinski , a. martin , j. outhwaite , ( 1999 ) , hep - ph/9903439 .
j. kwiecinski , a. martin , p. sutton , _ phys . rev . * d * _ * 52 * ( 1995 ) 1445 . , _ nucl .
* b * _ * 470 * ( 1996 ) 3 .
, _ nucl . phys .
* b * _ * 538 * ( 1999 ) 3 . ; j. breitweg et al .
j. * c * _ * 6 * ( 1999 ) 239 . | parton evolution at small values @xmath2 described by ccfm evolution equation @xmath3 equivalent to bfkl evolution equation large @xmath2 standard dglap equations coherence effects radiated gluons angular ordering monte carlo program smallx developed 1992 1997 linked dipole chain original ccfm equation predictions for hadronic final state properties studied in @xcite non - leading effects approaches description @xmath0 failed describe forward jet data hera experiments signature for new small @xmath2 parton dynamics treatment non - sudakov form factor @xmath1 effects consistency constraint non - leading contributions bfkl equation good description @xmath0 forward jet data achieved implementation ccfm parton evolution in monte carlo program smallx described basic ideas treatment non - sudakov form factor initial state gluon cascade generated from starting distribution @xmath4 unintegrated gluon distribution @xmath5 @xmath6 normalization constant @xmath7 gev@xmath8 gluons branch into virtual-channel gluon @xmath10 final gluon @xmath11 ccfm splitting function @xmath12 @xmath13 rescaled transverse momentum @xmath14 @xmath15 collinear cutoff avoid @xmath16 singularity @xmath17 sudakov form factor @xmath18 cancels against @xmath16 singularity generate @xmath19 gluon splitting function @xmath20 by @xmath21 non - sudakov form factor @xmath1 @xmath22 region @xmath23 @xmath24 constraint consistency constraint upper limit @xmath25 integral by @xmath26 @xmath27 non - sudakov form factor @xcite : @xmath28 @xmath29 no supression region @xmath30 @xmath31 monte carlo program smallx modified include non - sudakov form factor scale in @xmath32 changed to @xmath33 matrix problems @xmath34 @xmath35 restricted to @xmath36 consistency constraint next - to - leading effects in bfkl equation simulate 70% of full corrections kinematics branchings interpreted as next - to - leading effects kinematic constraintccfm equation energy momentum conservation included lo arguments from bfkl apply to ccfm effects @xmath16 terms consistency constraint studied modifications non - sudakov form factors predictions ccfm evolution equation program smallx structure function @xmath37 shown in fig . [ f2_1 ] without additional consistency constraint -15 mm -10 mm parameters used @xmath38 gev @xmath40 masses light quarks set to @xmath41 gev scale @xmath32 - matrix set to @xmath34 good description of @xmath0 range @xmath42 @xmath43 gev@xmath8 fig . fwd_jets_1 ] prediction forward jets data described -12 mm -8 mm effect @xmath16 term splitting function shown in figs . f2_1 ] fwd_jets_1 ] terms important for description @xmath0 forward jet data consistency constraint @xmath2 dependence cross section changes good description @xmath0 changing @xmath44 to @xmath45 gev forward jet cross section becomes smaller figs . f2_1_jets_1prediction similar bfkl equation @xcite @xmath34 scale @xmath32 grateful to b. webber code smallx b. andersson g. gustafson h kharraziha j kwiecinski l lnnblad a martin s munier peschanski g. salam discussions ccfm m. ciafaloni nucl . 296 ( 1988 ) 49 s. catani f. fiorani g. marchesini phys 234 ( 1990 ) 339 nucl phys 336 ( 1990 ) 18 g. marchesini 445 ( 1995 ) 49 e. kuraev l. lipatov v. fadin sov 44 ( 1976 ) 443 45 ( 1977 ) 199 y. balitskii l. lipatov 28 ( 1978 ) 822 g. marchesini b. webber 349 ( 1991 ) 617 nucl phys 386 ( 1992 ) 215 b. andersson g. gustafson j. samuelsson 467 ( 1996 ) 443 + b. andersson gustafson kharraziha samuelsson phys 71 ( 1996 ) 613 + g. gustafson kharrazihalnnblad jhep 98003:006 1998 ) g. bottazi marchesini salam scorletti jhep 9812:11 1998 ) hep - ph/9810546 kwiecinski a. martin outhwaite 1999 ) hep - ph/9903439 j kwiecinski a. martin p. sutton phys . rev d 52 1995 ) 1445 nucl 470 1996 ) 3 nucl 538 1999 ) 3 breitweg al 6 1999 ) 239 | 0.31161 | 2,000 | 1,074 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.