sample_number int64 8 203k | abstract stringlengths 21 17.4k | article stringlengths 0 18.9k | compressed_article stringlengths 0 10.9k | compression_time float64 0 0.78 | original_tokens int64 0 3.79k | compressed_tokens int64 0 2.29k | token_saving stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
196,378 | we investigate the effects of the purely toroidal magnetic field on the equilibrium structures of the relativistic stars .
the master equations for obtaining equilibrium solutions of relativistic rotating stars containing purely toroidal magnetic fields are derived for the first time . to solve these master equations numerically ,
we extend the cook - shapiro - teukolsky scheme for calculating relativistic rotating stars containing no magnetic field to incorporate the effects of the purely toroidal magnetic fields . by using the numerical scheme ,
we then calculate a large number of the equilibrium configurations for a particular distribution of the magnetic field in order to explore the equilibrium properties .
we also construct the equilibrium sequences of the constant baryon mass and/or the constant magnetic flux , which model the evolution of an isolated neutron star as it loses angular momentum via the gravitational waves .
important properties of the equilibrium configurations of the magnetized stars obtained in this study are summarized as follows ; ( 1 ) for the non - rotating stars , the matter distribution of the stars is prolately distorted due to the toroidal magnetic fields .
( 2 ) for the rapidly rotating stars , the shape of the stellar surface becomes oblate because of the centrifugal force .
but , the matter distribution deep inside the star is sufficiently prolate for the mean matter distribution of the star to be prolate .
( 3 ) the stronger toroidal magnetic fields lead to the mass - shedding of the stars at the lower angular velocity .
( 4 ) for some equilibrium sequences of the constant baryon mass and magnetic flux , the stars can spin up as they lose angular momentum . | there is growing evidence for the existence of so - called magnetars , supermagnetized neutron stars with the magnetic fields of @xmath0 g ( e.g. , @xcite ) .
although such stars are estimated to be only a subclass ( @xmath1 ) of the canonical neutron stars with @xmath2 g @xcite , much attention has been paid to the objects because they pose many astrophysically exciting but unresolved problems .
giant flaring activities in the soft gamma repeaters observed for the last two decades have given us good opportunities to study the coupling of the interior to the magnetospheric structures of magnetars @xcite , but the relationship between the crustal fraction and the subsequent star quarks has not yet been clarified ( see references in @xcite ) .
the origin of the large magnetic field is also a big problem , whether generated at post - collapse in the rapidly rotating neutron star @xcite or descended from the main sequence stars @xcite . assuming large magnetic fields before core - collapse , researches have recently performed extensive magnetohydrodynamic ( mhd ) stellar collapse simulations @xcite in order to understand the formation mechanism of magnetars , with different levels of sophistication in the treatment of equations of state ( eoss ) , the neutrino transport , and general relativity ( see @xcite for a review ) .
here it is worth mentioning that the gravitational waves from magnetars could be a useful source of information about magnetar interiors @xcite . from a microscopic point of view , the effects of magnetic field larger than the so - called qed limit of @xmath3 , on the eoss ( e.g. , @xcite ) and the radiation processes have been also extensively investigated ( see @xcite for a review ) . for the understanding of the formation and evolution of the magnetars ,
it is indispensable to unify these macroscopic and microscopic studies , albeit not an easy job .
when one tries to study the above interesting issues , the construction of an equilibrium configuration of magnetars may be one of the most fundamental problems . in spite of the many magnetized star investigations that have so far been carried out , with different levels of sophistication in the treatment of the magnetic field structure , equations of state ( eoss ) , and the general relativity @xcite ,
there still remains room for more sophistication in the previous studies in which stellar structures are obtained within the framework of newtonian dynamics .
since we are interested in magnetar structures , the general relativistic treatment due to the strong gravity of magnetars is required in constructions of a magnetar model . however , a fully general relativistic means constructing a stellar model with arbitrarily magnetic structure are still not available . in most studies on the structures of relativistic magnetized stars , weak magnetic fields and/or purely poloidal magnetic fields have been assumed .
bocquet et al .
@xcite and cardall et al .
@xcite have treated relativistic stellar models containing purely poloidal magnetic fields .
konno et al .
@xcite have analyzed similar models using a perturbative approach .
ioka and sasaki have investigated structures of mixed poloidal - toroidal magnetic fields around a spherical star by using a perturbative technique @xcite .
as shown in core - collapse supernova mhd simulations ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) , the toroidal magnetic fields can be easily amplified because of the winding up of the initial seed poloidal fields as long as the core is rotating differentially .
after core bounce , as a result , the toroidal fields dominate over the poloidal ones in some proto - neutron star models even if there is no toroidal field initially .
this winding up amplification of the toroidal magnetic fields therefore indicates that some neutron stars could have toroidal fields much higher than poloidal ones .
as mentioned before , however , no effect of a strong toroidal magnetic field has been taken into account in relativistic magnetized stellar models . in order to elucidate the effects of strong toroidal magnetic fields on neutron star structures , in this paper , we concentrate on magnetic effects due to purely toroidal fields on structures of relativistic stars as a first step . within the framework of the newtonian dynamics
, miketinac has obtained highly magnetized stars containing purely toroidal magnetic fields @xcite . in this study , we extend miketinac s models so as to include the effects of general relativity and rotation . first of all , we derive master equations for obtaining relativistic rotating stellar models having purely toroidal magnetic fields .
the master equations obtained are converted into integral expressions and solved numerically with a self - consistent field scheme similar to the komatsu - eriguchi - hachisu scheme for equilibrium structures of relativistic rotating stars @xcite . using the numerical scheme written in the present study , we construct a large number of equilibrium stars for a wide range of parameters .
as shown by trehan & uberoi @xcite , the toroidal magnetic field tends to distort a stellar shape prolately .
this is because the toroidal magnetic field lines behave like a rubber belt , pulling in the matter around the magnetic axis .
such a prolate - shaped neutron star may be an optimal source of gravitational waves if the star rotates @xcite . in this gravitational wave emission mechanism , one important parameter is degree of prolateness , which determines the amount of gravitational radiation .
thus , we pay attention to the deformation of the star .
we also construct sequences of the equilibrium stars along which the total baryon rest mass and/or the magnetic flux with respect to the meridional cross - section keep constant .
these equilibrium sequences are available for exploring evolutionary sequences because the total baryon rest mass and the magnetic flux are well conserved in quasi - steady evolution of isolated neutron stars .
this paper is organized as follows .
the master equations for obtaining equilibrium configurations of rotating stars with purely toroidal magnetic fields are derived in sec .
[ sec : basic ] .
the numerical scheme for computing the stellar models is briefly described in sec .
[ sec : numsch ] .
[ sec : result ] is devoted to showing numerical results .
summary and discussion follow in sec .
[ sec : summary ] . in this paper
, we use geometrical units with @xmath4 .
the rotating relativistic stars containing purely toroidal magnetic fields are considered in this paper . assumptions to obtain the equilibrium models are summarized as follows ; ( 1 ) equilibrium models are stationary and axisymmetric , i.e. the spacetime has the time killing vector , @xmath5 , and the rotational killing vector , @xmath6 , and lie derivatives of the physical quantities of the equilibrium models with respect to these killing vectors vanish .
( 2 ) the matter source is approximated by a perfect fluid with infinite conductivity .
( 3 ) there is no meridional flow of the matter .
( 4 ) the equation of state for the matter is barotropic . by virtue of assumption
( 3 ) , the matter four - velocity is reduced to @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the angular velocity of the matter .
we further assume that the magnetic field of the star has toroidal parts only , so that the faraday tensor , @xmath9 , obeys the conditions , given by @xmath10 note that since eq .
( [ eq : fraday ] ) includes five independent conditions , we see that the faraday tensor has one independent component only .
thanks to the conditions assumed above , one of the maxwell equations and the perfect - conductivity condition , @xmath11 } = 0,\label{eq : maxwel}\\ & & f_{\mu\nu}u^\nu = 0,\label{eq : mhd}\end{aligned}\ ] ] are automatically satisfied , and we need not consider them any further .
the stress - energy tensor of the perfectly conductive fluid is given by @xmath12 , \label{eq : stress - tensor}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath13 is the rest energy density , @xmath14 the specific internal energy , @xmath15 the pressure , and @xmath16 the inverse of the metric @xmath17 .
here , we have defined the magnetic field measured by the observer with the fluid four - velocity @xmath18 as @xmath19 where @xmath20 stands for the contravariant levi - civita tensor with @xmath21 . here
@xmath22 denotes the determinant of the metric . by using eqs .
( [ eq:4-vel])([eq : fraday ] ) , ( [ eq : mhd])([eq : stress - tensor ] ) , and ( [ eq : bfield ] ) , we can prove that the circularity condition , i.e. , @xmath23 } = \varphi_\alpha t^{\alpha[\beta } t^\gamma \varphi^{\delta ] } = 0 $ ] , is satisfied in the present situation @xcite . note that a similar argument about the circularity has been given by oron @xcite .
therefore , there exists a family of two - surfaces everywhere orthogonal to the plane defined by the two killing vectors @xmath5 and @xmath6 @xcite , and the metric can be written , following @xcite , in the form where the metric potentials , @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , and @xmath28 , are functions of @xmath29 and @xmath30 only .
we see that the non - zero component of @xmath9 in this coordinate is @xmath31 .
it is convenient to define the determinants of two two - dimensional subspaces for later discussion , where @xmath39 is the specific enthalpy and we have assumed the uniform rotation , i.e. , @xmath40 .
note that although the extension to the case of the differential rotation is straightforward , we take the uniform rotation law for the sake of simplicity .
integrability of eq .
( [ eq : euler2 ] ) requires with the metric ( [ eq : metric ] ) , the four - velocity ( [ eq:4-vel ] ) , the proper velocity of the matter with respect to a zero angular momentum observer ( zamo ) , @xmath47 , the components of the magnetic field ( [ eq : comp - mag1])-([eq : comp - mag2 ] ) , and the hydrostatic equilibrium equation ( [ eq : ber ] ) can be , respectively , written as @xmath48 following @xcite , we may write the general relativistic field equations determining @xmath26 , @xmath25 , and @xmath28 as @xmath49 = s_\rho(r,\mu),\label{eq : basic - rho}\\ & & \left ( \nabla^2 + \frac{1}{r}\partial_r - \frac{\mu}{r^2}\partial_\mu \right ) [ \gamma { \rm e}^{\gamma/2 } ] = s_\gamma ( r,\mu),\label{eq : basic - gam}\\ & & \left ( \nabla^2 + \frac{2}{r}\partial_r - \frac{2\mu}{r^2}\partial_\mu \right ) [ \omega { \rm e}^{(\gamma-2\rho)/2 } ] = s_\omega ( r,\mu ) , \label{eq : basic - omg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath50 is the laplacian of flat 3-space , and @xmath51 . here , @xmath52 , @xmath53 , and @xmath54
are given by @xmath55 \big \},\label{eq : soc - rho}\\ & & s_\gamma(r,\mu ) = { \rm e}^{\gamma/2 } \left\ { 16 \pi { \rm e}^{2\alpha } \left ( p + \frac{|b|^2}{8\pi } \right ) + \frac{\gamma}{2 } \left [ 16 \pi { \rm e}^{2\alpha } \left ( p + \frac{|b|^2}{8\pi } \right ) - \frac{1}{2}\gamma_{,r}^2 - \frac{1-\mu^2}{2r^2}\gamma_{,\mu}^2\right ] \right \},\label{eq : soc - gam}\\ & & s_\omega(r,\mu ) = { \rm e}^{(\gamma-2\rho)/2 } \big\ { - 16\pi { \rm e}^{2\alpha } \frac{(\omega-\omega)(\rho_0 + \rho_0 e + p ) } { 1-v^2 } \nonumber\\ & & + \omega \big [ - 8 \pi { \rm e}^{2\alpha } \left ( \frac{(\rho_0 + \rho_0 e + p ) ( 1 + v^2 ) } { 1-v^2 } - p - \frac{|b|^2}{8\pi } \right ) - \frac{1}{r } \left ( 2 \rho_{,r } + \frac{1}{2}\gamma_{,r}\right ) + \frac{\mu}{r^2 } \left ( 2 \rho_{,\mu } + \frac{1}{2 } \gamma_{,\mu } \right ) \nonumber\\ & & + \frac{1}{4 } ( 4\rho_{,r}^2 - \gamma_{,r}^2 ) + \frac{1-\mu^2}{4r^2 } ( 4\rho_{,\mu}^2 - \gamma_{,\mu}^2 ) - r^2 ( 1 - \mu^2 ) { \rm e}^{-2\rho } \left ( \omega_{,r}^2 + \frac{1-\mu^2}{r^2}\omega_{,\mu}^2 \right ) \big ] \big\ } , \label{eq : soc - omg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath56 denotes the magnitude of the magnetic field , given by latexmath:[\ ] ] are satisfied because of the maxwell equation and infinite conductivity of the fluid , we have @xmath160 where @xmath161 stands for the lie differentiation with respect to @xmath18 , and @xmath27 denotes an arbitrary function .
this implies that the flux of @xmath9 is conserved along any tube generated by curves parallel to @xmath18 . in other words ,
the integral of @xmath9 , defined as @xmath162 where @xmath163 is a two - dimensional surface co - moving with the fluid flow parametrized by its proper time @xmath164 , is conserved in the sense that @xmath165 in the present situation , we can take as @xmath163 the two - surface orthogonal to the plane defined by the two killing vectors parametrized by @xmath29 and @xmath30 . for the present situation
, we can then reduce @xmath88 into @xmath166 which is frequently called the magnetic flux . | growing evidence for existence of magnetars supermagnetized neutron stars with magnetic fields of @xmath0 g @xcite ) stars estimated subclass ( @xmath1 ) of canonical neutron stars with @xmath2 g @xcite attention paid objects pose astrophysically unresolved problems giant flaring activities in soft gamma repeaters opportunities study coupling interior magnetospheric structures of magnetars @xcite relationship between crustal fraction star quarks not clarified origin of large magnetic field problem generated post - collapse in neutron star @xcite or descended from main sequence stars large magnetic fields before core - collapse researches performed magnetohydrodynamic stellar collapse simulations @xcite understand formation mechanism of magnetars equations of state neutrino transport relativity gravitational waves from magnetars could be useful source information about magnetar interiors @xcite effects of magnetic field larger than qed limit of @xmath3 on eoss radiation processes investigated for understanding formation evolution of magnetars to unify macroscopic and microscopic studiesissues construction equilibrium configuration of magnetars fundamental many magnetized star investigations different magnetic field structure equations of state general relativity room for more sophistication in previous studies stellar structures newtonian dynamics interested in magnetar structures general relativistic treatment due to strong gravity required magnetar model fully general relativistic means constructing stellar model with arbitrarily magnetic structure not available studies relativistic magnetized stars weak magnetic fields purely poloidal magnetic fields assumed bocquet et cardall et al treated relativistic stellar models purely poloidal magnetic fields konno et analyzed models perturbative approach ioka sasaki investigated mixed poloidal - toroidal magnetic fields around spherical star perturbative technique core - collapse supernova mhd simulations toroidal magnetic fields amplified initial seed poloidal fields core rotating differentially after core bounce toroidal fields dominate over poloidal in some proto - neutron star models no toroidal field amplification indicates some neutron stars could have toroidal fields higher than poloidalno effect of strong toroidal magnetic field in relativistic magnetized stellar models effects strong toroidal magnetic fields on neutron star structures concentrate on magnetic effects toroidal fields on relativistic stars miketinac obtained highly magnetized stars toroidal magnetic fields @xcite extend miketinac s models to include effects general relativity rotation derive master equations for relativistic rotating stellar models toroidal magnetic fields equations converted into integral expressions solved numerically with self - consistent field scheme similar to komatsu - eriguchi - hachisu scheme for equilibrium structures rotating stars construct equilibrium stars for wide range of parameters toroidal magnetic field stellar shape lines like rubber belt pulling matter around magnetic axis prolate - shaped neutron star optimal source of gravitational waves if rotates @xcite parameter degree prolateness determines gravitational radiation pay attention to deformation star construct sequences equilibrium stars total baryon rest mass magnetic flux meridional cross - section constantequilibrium sequences available for exploring evolutionary sequences total baryon rest mass magnetic flux conserved in quasi - steady evolution of isolated neutron stars paper organized master equations for equilibrium configurations of rotating stars with toroidal magnetic fields derived in sec numerical scheme for computing stellar models described in sec result devoted to numerical results summary discussion follow in use geometrical units with @xmath4 rotating relativistic stars toroidal magnetic fields considered assumptions equilibrium models models stationary axisymmetric spacetime has time killing vector rotational killing vector derivatives of physical quantities vanish matter source approximated by perfect fluid with infinite conductivity no meridional flow equation of state for matter is barotropic matter four - velocity reduced to @xmath7 @xmath8 is angular velocity of matter magnetic field star has toroidal parts only faraday tensor , @xmath9 obeys conditions by @xmath10 eq . includes five independent conditions faraday tensor has one independent componentconditions assumed maxwell equations perfect - conductivity condition @xmath11 } = 0{eq : maxwel f\nu = 0 : mhd automatically satisfied stress - energy tensor of conductive fluid by @xmath12 stress - tensor @xmath13 energy density @xmath14 specific internal energy @xmath15 pressure @xmath16 inverse metric @xmath17 defined magnetic field measured fluid four - velocity @xmath18 as @xmath19 @xmath20 contravariant levi - civita tensor with @xmath21 @xmath22 determinant of metric using eqs eq:4-vel fraday : mhd stress - tensor bfield ] circularity condition @xmath23 } = \varphi_\alpha t\beta t\gamma \varphi\delta = 0 $ satisfied present situation similar argument circularity by oron @xcite family of two - surfaces orthogonal to plane defined by vectors @xmath5 @xmath6 @xcite metric written following @xcite metric potentials @xmath25 functions of @xmath29 @xmath30 non - zero component of @xmath9 coordinate is @xmath31 define determinants of two two - dimensional subspaces later discussion @xmath39 specific enthalpy assumed uniform rotation @xmath40 extension to differential rotation straightforward take uniform rotation law for simplicity integrability eqeq : euler2 ] requires metric four - velocity proper velocity matter zero angular momentum observer @xmath47 components magnetic field comp - mag1]- mag2 hydrostatic equilibrium equation written @xmath48 @xcite general relativistic field equations @xmath26 @xmath25 @xmath28 as @xmath49 = s_\rho(r,\mu), basic - rho\frac{1}{r}\partial_r -^2}\partial_\mu \gamma\gamma/2 } ] = s_\gamma ( r,\mu), basic - gam\frac{2}{r}\partial_r -\frac{2\mu}{r^2}\partial_\mu \omega { \gamma-2\rho)/2 } ] = s_\omega ( r,\mu ){eq : basic - omg}\end{aligned} @xmath50 laplacian flat 3-space @xmath51 @xmath52 given by @xmath55 soc - rho\gamma(r\mu ) \rm{\gamma/2 16 \pi{2\alpha \frac{|^2}{8\pi\frac{\gamma}{2 16 \pi{2\alpha\frac{|^2}{8\pi \frac{1}{2}\gamma_{,r}^2\frac{1-\mu^2}{2r^2}\gamma_{^2\right soc - gam\omega(r,\mu ) \rm(\gamma-2\rho)/2 16\pi \rm{2\alpha } \frac{(\omega-\rho_0 +_0 e + p ) 1-v^2 }\omega 8 \pi {2\alpha \frac{(\rho_0 + _0 e + p ) 1 + v^2 1-v^2 \frac{|b|^2}{8\pi \right \frac{1}{r \rho_{ \frac{1}{2}\gamma_{,r}\right ) \frac{\mu}{r^2 \left\rho_{,\mu } + \frac{1}{2\gamma_{, \nonumber\\ + \frac{1}{4 4\rho_{,r}^2 -\gamma_{,r}^2 ) \frac{1-\mu^2}{4r^2 4\rho_{,\mu^2 -\gamma_{,^2 - r^2 1 - \mu^2 )^{-2\rho \omega_{,r}^2 + \frac{1-\mu^2}{r^2\omega_{,\mu}^2 \big \label{eq soc - omg}\end{aligned} @xmath56 magnitude magnetic field maxwell equation infinite conductivity fluid @xmath160 @xmath161 lie differentiation @xmath18 @xmath27 arbitrary function flux @xmath9 conserved tube curves parallel @xmath18 integral @xmath9 @xmath162 @xmath163 two - surface co - moving fluid flow @xmath164 conserved @xmath165 @xmath163 two - surface orthogonal plane @xmath29 @xmath30 reduce @xmath88 into @xmath166 magnetic flux | 0.563598 | 3,260 | 1,697 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,382 | based on @xmath0 data sets collected with the bes detector at bepc , the recent @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 results from bes are presented .
some results are compared with nrqcd .
# 1(#4)#1*#2 * , # 3 ( # 4 ) -4 mm 0.2 cm | charmonium physics is always one of the interesting and intriguing fields of particle physics .
charmonium provides us an excellent and simple system to study qcd , the production and decay mechanisms of heavy quarkonia and light hadron spectra from its decays , and can be treated nonrelativistically and perturbatively . using @xmath0 sample collected with the beijing spectrometer ( bes ) at bepc , the recent @xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath3 results are presented .
the bes detector is described in detail in ref .
0.1 cm out of the charmonium decays , there exists a mysterious and longstanding @xmath6 puzzle of @xmath7 and @xmath1 decays @xcite , first revealed by mark - ii collaboration . in qcd , both @xmath1 and @xmath8 decays are expected to be dominated by annihilations into three gluons . based on the similarity between the @xmath1 and @xmath8 wave functions and the slow running of the strong interaction coupling constant @xmath9 ,
the non - relativistic perturbative qcd predicts @xcite : the ratios of the decays widths of @xmath4 into hadrons to those of @xmath7 into hadrons are : @xmath10 named as the `` @xmath11 '' rule .
mark ii first observed the vector - pseudoscalar ( v for vector , p pseudoscalar , b baryon , a axial - vector and t tensor ) @xmath6 and @xmath12 channels are highly suppressed w.r.t .
the @xmath13 expectation known as the @xmath6 puzzle .
bes has confirmed the puzzle with much lower upper limit by a suppression factor of @xmath14 and observed new highly suppressed decay modes , meanwhile bes presents many observations ( table [ hadronic ] ) . from table
[ hadronic ] , a large number of @xmath4 decay branching ratios have been measured , and most for the first time @xcite . and
it is found that some vp , vpp , vt , pbb and ap decay modes are suppressed w.r.t .
the @xmath13 rule , where vt modes @xcite is the first evidence for suppression other than vp . while for @xmath4 decays into ap modes @xcite , the normal decay @xmath15 , enhanced mode @xmath16 and suppressed decay @xmath17 are observed .
the @xmath13 rule holds for the radiative decays into vt modes @xcite within errors , but it is suppressed for the decays into vp modes@xcite . now the suppressed decays also extend to the 3-body decays , but the @xmath13 rule holds for the baryonic decays @xcite .
quite a few models @xcite have been put forward to explain the puzzle , but none of them is satisfactory . from the measured results , it has also been observed that the * strong double ozi ( dozi ) violation * in @xmath18 and the isospin violation in the decays between @xmath19 and the isospin - conserving and su(3)-allowed decay @xmath20 , and
between the charged and neutral decays @xmath21 and @xmath22 . fig .
[ phif0 ] shows the @xmath23 and @xmath24 invariant masses for @xmath25 and @xmath26 @xcite .
also bes first measures @xmath27 and has precisely determined @xmath28 @xcite with errors half of those in pdg98 . -1.2
cm -0.0 cm .[hadronic ] @xmath4 decay branching ratios ( the unpublished results indicated by * are preliminary ) . [
cols="<,^,^,^",options="header " , ] -1.2 cm
using the @xmath29 @xmath4 data sets at bes , a large number of @xmath1 and @xmath2 results have been presented , many of them for the first measurements and/or with the unprecedented precision .
bes has observed new suppressed decay modes and first observed enhanced decay from @xmath4 among a large number of the normal hadronic decays .
some results are also compared with nrqcd calculations .
we acknowledge the strong efforts of the bepc staff and the helpful service from the ihep computing center . the work of the bes collaboration is supported in part by the national natural science foundation of china under contract no .
19991480 and the chinese academy of sciences under contract kj95t-03 , and by the department of energy under contract nos .
de - fg03 - 92er40701 ( caltech ) , de - fg03 - 93er40788 ( colorado state university ) , de - ac03 - 76sf00515 ( slac ) , de - fg03 - 91er40679 ( uc irvine ) , de - fg03 - 94er40833 ( u hawaii ) , de - fg03 - 95er40925 ( ut dallas ) .
99 j. z. bai et al . , bes coll . , & 344&319(1994 ) .
m. e. b. franklin et al .
, & 51&963(1983 ) .
t. applequist and d. politzer & 34&43(1975 ) .
particle data group , r. m. barnet et al .
j. * c3 * 1998 .
j. z. bai et al . , bes coll .
, & 81&5080(1998 ) . .
@xmath1 ratiative decays into two pseudoscalars , to be submitted .
@xmath1 decays into baryon - antibaryon pairs , to be submitted .
for example , w. s. hou and a. soni , phys .
lett * 50 * , 569(1983 ) ; s. j. brodsky , g. p. lepage and s. f. tuan , phys .
lett * 59 * , 631(1987 ) ; x. q. li et al . ,
phys . rev .
* d55 * , 1241(1997 ) s. j. brodsky and m. karliner , phys .
78*,468(1997 ) ; y. q. chen and e. braaten , phys
lett * 80*,5060(1998 ) .
@xmath1 hadronic decays involving @xmath30 , to be submitted . .
g. t. bodwin , e. braaten and g. p. lepage phys .
rev.*d46 * , 1914(1992 ) ; ibid * d51 * , 1125(1995 ) . j. bolz , p. kroll and g.a .
schuler , & 392&198(1997 ) .
j. * c2 * , 705 ( 1998 ) ; p. kroll , hep - ph/9709393 ; s. m. h. wong , hep - ph/9903236 . | charmonium physics system study qcd production decay mechanisms heavy quarkonia light hadron spectra treated nonrelativistically perturbatively using @xmath0 sample beijing spectrometer recent @xmath4 @xmath3 results presented bes detector described ref . 0.1 cm charmonium decays mysterious @xmath6 puzzle of @xmath7 @xmath1 decays @xcite revealed by mark - ii collaboration @xmath1 @xmath8 decays dominated by annihilations into three gluons similarity @xmath1 @xmath8 wave functions slow running strong interaction coupling constant @xmath9 non - relativistic perturbative qcd predicts @xcite ratios decays widths @xmath4 to @xmath7 into hadrons @xmath10 @xmath11 '' rule mark ii observed vector - pseudoscalar @xmath6 @xmath12 channels suppressed @xmath6 puzzle bes confirmed puzzle lower upper limit suppression factor of @xmath14 observed new suppressed decay modes bes presents observations tabletable hadronic @xmath4 decay branching ratios measured first time @xcite vp vpp vt pbb ap decay modes suppressed @xmath13 rule vt modes @xcite first evidence suppression @xmath4 decays ap modes normal decay @xmath15 enhanced mode @xmath16 suppressed decay @xmath17 observed rule holds radiative decays vt modes suppressed decays vp modes@xcite suppressed decays extend 3-body decays rule holds baryonic decays @xcite models @xcite puzzle none satisfactory results strong double ozi violation @xmath18 isospin violation decays @xmath19 isospin - conserving-allowed decay @xmath20 charged neutral decays @xmath21 @xmath22 fig. shows @xmath23 @xmath24 invariant masses @xmath25 @xmath26 @xcite bes measures @xmath27 determined @xmath28 @xcite errors half pdg98 -1.2 -0.0 cm @xmath4 decay branching ratios unpublished results preliminarycols="^^",options="header " -1.2 cm @xmath29 @xmath4 data sets bes @xmath1 @xmath2 results presented first measurements unprecedented precision bes observed suppressed decay modes enhanced decay from @xmath4 normal hadronic decays results compared with nrqcd calculations acknowledge efforts bepc staff service ihep computing center bes collaboration supported by national natural science foundation china 19991480 chinese academy of sciences department of energy - fg03 - 92er40701 caltech 93er40788 colorado state university 76sf00515 slac 91er40679 uc irvine 94er40833 u hawaii 95er40925 ut dallas j z. bai et al . bes coll 344&319(1994 ) franklin 51&963(1983 ) applequist. politzer 34&43(1975 ) particle data group. barnet et al 1998 bai bes coll 81&5080(1998 ) @xmath1 ratiative decays into two pseudoscalars @xmath1 decays into baryon - antibaryon pairs submitted w. s. hou a.soni phys . lett 50 569(1983 ) brodsky lepage tuan phys 59 631(1987 ) li phys . rev d55 1241(1997 ) brodsky karliner . 78*,468(1997 ) chen braaten lett 80,5060(1998 ) @xmath1 hadronic decays @xmath30 submitted bodwin braaten lepage phys . rev*d46 1914(1992 ) ibid d51 1125(1995 ) bolz p kroll schuler 392&198(1997 ) c2 1998 ) p kroll hep - ph/9709393 wong hep - ph/9903236 | 0.263159 | 1,543 | 827 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,399 | we argue that atmospheric cascades can be regarded as example of the self - organized criticality and studied by using lvy flights and nonextensive approach .
it allows us to understand the scale - invariant energy fluctuations inside cascades in a natural way . | it is well known that energy spectra of particles from atmospheric family events which are observed by the emulsion chambers at mountain altitudes are essentially following power - like dependence . on the other hand
the occurence of power - law distributions is a very common feature in nature and it is usually connected with such notions as criticality , fractals and chaotic dynamics and studied using generalized ( nonextensive ) maximum entropy formalism characterized by a nonextensivity parameter @xmath0 .
such formalism leads in a natural way to power - laws in the frame of equilibrium processes @xcite . for non - equilibrium phenomena the sources of power - law distributions are self - organized criticality @xcite and stochastic multiplicative processes @xcite . in the former nonequilibrium systems are continuously driven by their own internal dynamic to a critical state with power - laws omnipresent . in the later power - law
is generated by the presence of underlying replication of events .
all these approaches can be unified in terms of generalized nonextensive statistics mentioned above ( widely known as tsallis statistics ) @xcite .
+ we shall look therefore at the development of cascades from this point of view . to be more specific ,
we shall use the notion of lvy flights as representatives of power - laws emerging from generalized statistics @xcite .
( 7.28,7.11 ) fig.1 distributions @xmath1 for multiplicative process , as given by eq . (
[ eq : multi ] ) ( histograms ) , for different generation numbers @xmath2 and @xmath3 are fitted by lvy distribution ( eq .
( [ eq : levy ] ) ) ( solid lines ) with parameters @xmath4 and @xmath5 , respectively . let us start with numerical ( monte - carlo ) consideration of the following model of multiplicative process : @xmath6 where @xmath7 is random number taken from the exponential distribution ( to account for the essentially exponential scaled energy dependence of the single elementary interaction ) : @xmath8 as was shown in @xcite , every exponential distribution with a fluctuating parameter results in the lvy distribution ( cf .
1 ) , which in our case has the following form @xmath9^{-\alpha}. \label{eq : levy}\ ] ] ( 7.28,7.11 ) fig.2 dependence of the parameter @xmath10 of the levy distribution ( [ eq : levy ] ) on the generation number @xmath11 . solid line represents fit by the formula ( [ eq : par ] ) with @xmath12 .
asymptotically @xmath13 ( dotted line ) . in our present case
parameter @xmath10 depends on the number of generations @xmath11 and on the parameter @xmath14 which defines exponential distribution of the variable @xmath7 ( in the limit of large @xmath11 dependence on @xmath14 effectively vanishes ) . as is illustrated in fig .
2 , dependence @xmath15 can be described by simple formula @xmath16 where @xmath17 is generation independent parameter which should be fitted ( in our case @xmath12 ) .
if we use the canonical form of lvy distribution as emerging from tsallis statistics @xcite , @xmath18 ^{\frac{1}{1-q } } , \label{eq : levt}\ ] ] where mean @xmath19 is given by the parameter @xmath20 and @xmath0 is mentioned before nonextensive parameter such that @xmath21 @xcite then @xmath22 notice that for @xmath23 parameter @xmath24 ( or , respectively , @xmath25 ) , i.e. , we are recovering the initial exponential distribution . in the limit @xmath26 parameter
@xmath0 approaches value @xmath27 , which is limiting value available for @xmath0 emerging from the normalization condition imposed on the probability distribution @xmath28 . in this limit @xmath29 .
it is interesting to note that for @xmath30\cdot [ 1/(\alpha - 2 ) ] > > 1 $ ] , i.e. , for @xmath31 sufficiently large one gets power - like behaviour of @xmath28 : @xmath32 actually such situation is reached reasonably fast , because @xmath33 and @xmath10 tends to its limiting value @xmath34 rather quickly with increasing number of generations @xmath11 . in practice the equilibrium distribution @xmath35 is reached ( for @xmath36 ) already for @xmath37 .
there exists a number of experimental data from the emulsion chambers exposed at mountain altitudes , which are relevant for our approach and which we shall compare with now @xcite .
although , as we have already mentioned , the energy spectra of particles from atmospheric family events they represent are roughly expressed by the power - law distributions , so far there was no analysis showing wheather it is true and to what extend .
our work is the first attempt in this direction as we show that they all can be described by the lvy type spectra .
( 7.28,7.11 ) fig.3 integral energy spectra for gamma quanta ( circles ) and hadrons ( squares ) in families registered at mt .
kambala are fitted by lvy distributions ( solid lines ) .
integral spectra @xmath38 from kambala experiment ( at @xmath39 ) @xcite are shown in fig .
3 where they are fitted using parameters @xmath40 ( for gamma families ) and @xmath41 ( for hadronic families ) . notice that hadronic component is little `` younger '' ( higher @xmath10 means smaller @xmath11 , cf .
2 ) than the electromagnetic component .
families observed deeper in the atmosphere ( what means higher @xmath11 ) have smaller @xmath10 , as expected , cf .
4 , where @xmath38 from pamir experiment ( at @xmath42 ) @xcite are presented . here
the corresponding parameters @xmath43 are equal to @xmath44 and @xmath45 for gamma and hadronic components , respectively .
it is evident from figs . 3 and 4 that the observed gamma - hadron families are already reaching their quasi - equilibrium states
. it should be noticed that most of the families registered come not from a single nuclear interaction but they usually contain particles which are decascadents of several ( @xmath46 at @xmath47 tev ) genetically connected nuclear interactions @xcite .
our analysis indicates that the average number of cascade generations leading to the observed distributions is about @xmath48 .
( 7.28,7.11 ) fig.4 integral energy spectra for gamma quanta ( circles ) and hadrons ( squares ) in families registered at mt .
pamir are fitted by lvy distributions ( solid lines ) .
we have provided description of cascade processes encountered in cosmic ray emulsion experiments at high altitudes , which is based on the notion of lvy distrubutions ( which , in turn , originate from the nonextensive statistics described by parameter @xmath0 @xcite ) . in this way we have found that the observed distributions are to a high accuracy power - like , but at the same time we are able to account for the small deviations from the exact power - like behaviour .
they are , in our approach , directly connected with the finite number @xmath11 of the cascade generations in the way provided by formulas ( [ eq : par ] ) or ( [ eq : q ] ) .
the results presented before should be confronted with the result of pure nuclear origin , which is the case of the so called `` halo '' events with strong concentration of particles in the central region . fig .
5 shows such a case exposing integral energy distribution of shower cores ( recorded at distance @xmath49 cm from the energy - weighted center ) obtained in a `` halo '' event p06 registered at chacaltaya @xcite . in this case
we observe almost exponential distribution ( @xmath50 in this case , what translates to @xmath51 ) with no influence of multiplicative processes .
finally , it should be noticed that there exists a number of special cases more - or - less directly connected with our results : + @xmath52 energy transport equation @xcite for cascade processes gives @xmath53 as number of particles with energy @xmath54 at depth @xmath55 .
notice that for the age parameter @xmath56 one approaches equilibrium spectrum @xmath57 with the slope @xmath13 .
+ @xmath58 one observes strong intermittent behaviour in the families @xcite , which results from the fluctuations in the atmospheric cascades alone and is not sensitive to details of the elementary interactions .
+ @xmath59 one observes multifractal behaviour in the cascades with fractal dimension @xmath60 at each cascade stage @xmath11 where @xmath61 @xcite . for each successive emission
the distribution should be more inhomoheneous , i.e. , @xmath62 .
+ @xmath63 self - organized criticality @xcite to which all cascades considered here bear close resemblance because of the zipf s law @xcite , which predicts power - law behaviour of the type seen in eq.([eq : inf ] ) ( with @xmath64 ) .
+ acknowledgements : the partial support of polish committee for scientific research ( grants 2p03b 011 18 and 621/e-78/spub / cern / p-03/dz4/99 ) is acknowledged .
+ see , for example , g.wilk and z.wodarczyk , _ nucl .
* b * ( proc . suppl . ) * a75 * ( 1999 ) 191 and references therein .
j. phys . _
* 29 * no.1 ( 1999 ) ( also at the url : http://sbf.if.usp.br/ www_pages / journals/ bjp / vol29/num1/ index.htm ) for review . | energy spectra from atmospheric events observed by at mountain altitudes power - dependence power - law distributions common in nature connected with criticality fractals chaotic dynamics studied using generalized nonextensive maximum entropy formalism by nonextensivity parameter @xmath0 formalism leads to power - laws in equilibrium processes non - equilibrium sources of power - law distributions are self - organized criticality stochastic multiplicative processes former nonequilibrium systems driven by internal dynamic to critical state with power - laws later power - law generated by underlying replication of events approaches unified in generalized nonextensive statistics tsallis statistics ) at development of cascades lvy flights as representatives of power - laws from generalized statistics fig.1 distributions @xmath1 for multiplicative process by for different generation numbers @xmath2 and @xmath3 fitted by lvy distribution with parameters @xmath4 and @xmath5start numerical consideration model multiplicative process @xmath6 @xmath7 random number exponential distribution exponential scaled energy dependence elementary interaction @xmath8 exponential distribution fluctuating parameter results lvy distribution form @xmath9^{-\alpha}{eq : levy} ( 7.28,7.11 ) fig.2 dependence parameter @xmath10 levy distribution generation number @xmath11 line fit formula eq : par @xmath12 @xmath13 line parameter @xmath10 depends number generations @xmath11 parameter @xmath14 defines exponential distribution variable @xmath7 limit large @xmath11 dependence @xmath14 vanishes illustrated fig . 2 dependence @xmath15 described simple formula @xmath16 @xmath17 generation independent parameter fitted @xmath12 ) canonical form lvy distribution tsallis statistics @xcite @xmath18{\frac{1}{1-q }{eq : levt} mean @xmath19 given parameter @xmath20 @xmath0 nonextensive parameter @xmath21 @xcite @xmath22 @xmath23 parameter @xmath24 @xmath25 recovering initial exponential distributionlimit @xmath26 parameter @xmath0 approaches value @xmath27 limiting value @xmath0 normalization condition probability distribution @xmath28 limit @xmath29 @xmath30\cdot [ 1/(\alpha - 2 ) ] > > 1 $ ] @xmath31 large one power - like behaviour @xmath28 @xmath32 situation reached fast @xmath33 @xmath10 value @xmath34 quickly increasing generations @xmath11 equilibrium distribution @xmath35 reached @xmath36 @xmath37 experimental data emulsion chambers mountain altitudes relevant approach compare with @xcite energy spectra particles atmospheric family events expressed power - law distributions no analysis work first attempt described by lvy type spectra fig.3 integral energy spectra gamma quanta hadrons families mt . kambala fitted by lvy distributions integral spectra @xmath38 kambala experiment @xmath39 ) @xcite shown fig . 3 fitted using parameters @xmath40 gamma families @xmath41 hadronic families hadronic component younger higher @xmath10 smaller @xmath11 than electromagnetic componentfamilies observed deeper atmosphere higher @xmath11 have smaller @xmath10 cf . 4 @xmath38 from pamir experiment @xmath42 @xcite parameters @xmath43 equal to @xmath44 @xmath45 for gamma hadronic components figs . 3 4 observed gamma - hadron families reaching quasi - equilibrium states families registered not from single nuclear interaction contain particles decascadents of several @xmath46 @xmath47 genetically connected nuclear interactions @xcite average cascade generations distributions about @xmath48 fig.4 integral energy spectra for gamma quanta hadrons in families at mt . pamir fitted by lvy distributions solid lines description of cascade processes cosmic ray emulsion experiments high altitudes based on lvy distrubutions from nonextensive statistics parameter @xmath0 @xcite observed distributions high accuracy power - like account for small deviations connected with finite number @xmath11 cascade generations formulas eq : par : q ] results confronted with pure nuclear origin halo '' events with strong concentration particles central region fig .5 shows case exposing energy distribution shower cores recorded distance cm from energy - weighted center halo event chacaltaya @xcite almost exponential distribution @xmath50 translates to @xmath51 no influence multiplicative processes special cases connected with results @xmath52 energy transport equation cascade processes gives @xmath53 number particles with energy @xmath54 at depth @xmath55 age parameter @xmath56 approaches equilibrium spectrum @xmath57 slope @xmath13 @xmath58 observes intermittent behaviour in families results from fluctuations atmospheric cascades not sensitive to elementary interactions @xmath59 observes multifractal behaviour cascades fractal dimension each cascade stage each successive emission distribution inhomoheneous @xmath62 @xmath63 self - organized criticality @xcite resemblance zipf s law predicts power - law behaviour eq @xmath64 partial support polish committee for scientific research grants 2p03b 011 18 621/e-78/spub / / p-03/dz4/99 ) acknowledged see g.wilk z.wodarczyk 1999 ) 191 references phys . 291999 url http://sbf.if.usp.br www journals bjp vol29 index.htm review | 0.348002 | 2,124 | 1,109 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,404 | the sub - barrier pairs of energy levels of a hermitian one - dimensional symmetric double - well potential are known to merge into one , if the inter - well distance ( @xmath0 ) is increased slowly .
the energy at which the doublets merge are the ground state eigenvalues of independent ( @xmath1 ) .
we show that if the double - well is perturbed mildly by a complex pt - symmetric potential , the merging of levels turns into the coalescing of two levels at an exceptional point @xmath2 . for @xmath3 ,
the real part of complex - conjugate eigenvalues coincides with @xmath1 again .
this is an interesting and rare connection between the two phenomena in two domains : hermiticity and complex pt - symmetry . in one dimensional quantum mechanics
there is one to one correspondence between eigenvalues and eigenstates , there is an absence of degeneracy .
so when a parameter of the hamiltonian is varied slowly curves can not cross but they can come quite close and then diverge from each other ( avoided crossing ) . crossings and avoided crossings of levels is commonly observed in the spectra of two or three dimensional systems .
mostly , in one dimensional systems if a parameter of the potential is varied slowly , the eigenvalues increase or decrease monotonically . for particle in an infinitely deep well of width @xmath0 , @xmath4 ) decrease as function of @xmath0 .
for harmonic oscillator potential , @xmath5 increase linearly as function of the frequency parameter @xmath6 .
two levels coming very close may either display merging of two levels or their avoided crossing .
the former is well known to occur in symmetric double - well potentials wherein the sub - barrier doublets of energy levels merge [ 1,2 ] into the levels of the independent wells when the inter - well distance is increased slowly . on the other hand ac
is observed rather rarely in one dimensional systems .
recently , it has been shown [ 2,3 ] that in double - well potentials if the width or depth of the potential is varied slowly very interesting level crossings can be observed .
notably the double - well becomes asymmetric .
for one - dimensional non - hermitian hamiltonions , it is known that two complex eigenvalues may become real at one special value of the parameter(@xmath7 of the potential after this point these two eigenvalues may again be complex .
such special values of the parameter are called exceptional point ( ep ) [ 4 ] . more interestingly , when a potential pt - symmetric ( invariant under the joint action of parity : @xmath8 and time - reversal ( @xmath9 ) , the two discrete eigenvalues make a transition from real to complex - conjugate or _
vice versa_. for instance , in the complex pt - symmetric potential : @xmath10 , @xmath11 is the ep of this potential when @xmath12 eigenvalues are real , otherwise these are complex conjugate pairs[5 ] . ) pt - symmetric potentials . here , @xmath13 .
( a ) : double delta , ( b ) : double delta between two rigid walls , ( c ) : square double - well . , title="fig:",width=4,height=5 ] .5 cm ) pt - symmetric potentials . here , @xmath13 .
( a ) : double delta , ( b ) : double delta between two rigid walls , ( c ) : square double - well . , title="fig:",width=4,height=5 ] .5 cm ) pt - symmetric potentials . here , @xmath13 .
( a ) : double delta , ( b ) : double delta between two rigid walls , ( c ) : square double - well . , title="fig:",width=4,height=5 ] in fig .
2(a , b , c ) , we show the parametric evolution of eigenvalues @xmath14 for various pt - symmetric potentials [ 6,7 ] and for their hermitian counterparts .
[ 6 ] between two rigid walls at @xmath15 , ( b ) : @xmath16 [ 7 ] , ( c ) : @xmath17 [ 7 ] . in all three case @xmath18 .
the eigenvalues of their hermitian counterparts ( when @xmath19 is replaced by @xmath20 ) are shown by dashed lines . in ( b ) and ( c ) they exist for @xmath21 and @xmath22 , respectively .
notice the qualitative dis - similarity between two types of spectra .
however , quantitatively for small values of @xmath19 they do coincide.,title="fig:",width=14,height=6 ] + [ 6 ] between two rigid walls at @xmath15 , ( b ) : @xmath16 [ 7 ] , ( c ) : @xmath17 [ 7 ] . in all three case @xmath18 .
the eigenvalues of their hermitian counterparts ( when @xmath19 is replaced by @xmath20 ) are shown by dashed lines . in ( b ) and ( c ) they exist for @xmath21 and @xmath22 , respectively . notice the qualitative dis - similarity between two types of spectra .
however , quantitatively for small values of @xmath19 they do coincide.,title="fig:",width=14,height=6 ] + [ 6 ] between two rigid walls at @xmath15 , ( b ) : @xmath16 [ 7 ] , ( c ) : @xmath17 [ 7 ] . in all three case @xmath18 .
the eigenvalues of their hermitian counterparts ( when @xmath19 is replaced by @xmath20 ) are shown by dashed lines . in ( b ) and ( c ) they exist for @xmath21 and @xmath22 , respectively . notice the qualitative dis - similarity between two types of spectra .
however , quantitatively for small values of @xmath19 they do coincide.,title="fig:",width=14,height=6 ] of the two levels of the dddp when @xmath0 is varied slowly : ( i ) @xmath23 ( dashed line ) , ( ii ) @xmath24 ( solid line ) , ( iii ) @xmath25 ( dotted line ) . dotted and solid lines represent coalescing of eigenvalues in complex pt - symmetric case .
dashed lines display merging of levels in hermitian case .
the eigenvalues are obtained from eq .
( 1),width=14,height=6 ] of the two levels of the double delta well between two rigid walls ( fig 1(b ) ) , when @xmath0 is varied slowly : ( i ) @xmath23 ( dashed line ) , ( ii ) @xmath24 ( solid line ) , ( iii ) @xmath25 ( dotted line ) . dotted and solid lines represent coalescing of eigenvalues in complex pt - symmetric case .
dashed lines display merging of levels in hermitian case .
not shown are the next two levels which are real without any coalescing .
eigenvalues have been obtained form eq .
( 3),width=14,height=6 ] of the six levels of the square double - well ( fig .
1(c ) ) when @xmath26 is varied : ( i ) @xmath27 ( dashed line ) , ( ii ) @xmath28 ( solid line ) , ( iii ) @xmath29 ( dotted line ) , ( iv ) @xmath30 ( dot - dashed line ) . excepting red dashed lines , others represent coalescing of eigenvalues in complex pt - symmetric case .
red dashed lines present merging of levels in hermitian case .
( a ) : @xmath31 for @xmath32 ( b ) : @xmath33 for @xmath32 and @xmath34 for @xmath35 ( c ) : @xmath36 for @xmath32 , @xmath37 for @xmath35 and @xmath31 for @xmath38
. eq .
( 8) has been used here.,title="fig:",width=14 ] + of the six levels of the square double - well ( fig .
1(c ) ) when @xmath26 is varied : ( i ) @xmath27 ( dashed line ) , ( ii ) @xmath28 ( solid line ) , ( iii ) @xmath29 ( dotted line ) , ( iv ) @xmath30 ( dot - dashed line ) . excepting red dashed lines , others represent coalescing of eigenvalues in complex pt - symmetric case .
red dashed lines present merging of levels in hermitian case .
( a ) : @xmath31 for @xmath32 ( b ) : @xmath33 for @xmath32 and @xmath34 for @xmath35 ( c ) : @xmath36 for @xmath32 , @xmath37 for @xmath35 and @xmath31 for @xmath38 .
eq .
( 8) has been used here.,title="fig:",width=14 ] + of the six levels of the square double - well ( fig .
1(c ) ) when @xmath26 is varied : ( i ) @xmath27 ( dashed line ) , ( ii ) @xmath28 ( solid line ) , ( iii ) @xmath29 ( dotted line ) , ( iv ) @xmath30 ( dot - dashed line ) .
excepting red dashed lines , others represent coalescing of eigenvalues in complex pt - symmetric case .
red dashed lines present merging of levels in hermitian case .
( a ) : @xmath31 for @xmath32 ( b ) : @xmath33 for @xmath32 and @xmath34 for @xmath35 ( c ) : @xmath36 for @xmath32 , @xmath37 for @xmath35 and @xmath31 for @xmath38 . eq . ( 8) has been used here.,title="fig:",width=14 ] for double dirac delta potential(dddp , fig .
1(a ) ) the formula for finding the eigenvalues of bound states [ 2 ] can be written as @xmath39 the solution of schrdinger equation for the double dirac - delta well between two rigid walls ( fig .
1(b ) ) is given by @xmath40 .
@xmath41 @xmath42[v_2-p(1+\coth pd)]=e^{-2pb}[v_1+p(1-\coth pd)][v_2+p(1-\coth pd)].\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath43 the solution of schrdinger equation for the square double - well potential ( fig.1(c ) )
is given as , @xmath44 and @xmath45 where , @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 for bound states , we demand @xmath50 . from eq.(7 ) we have @xmath51 , where @xmath52 .
finally we get , @xmath53 gives the eigenvalues of bound states of double - well in fig 1(c ) .
using eqs .
( 1,3,6 ) , we obtain eigenvalues of the double - well potentials ( fig .
1(a , b , c ) ) for both cases @xmath54 and @xmath55 . in fig 2 , by solid curves ,
we show the evolution of eigenvalues @xmath14 for three pt - symmetric potentials . by dashed curves
, we show the same for hermitian counterparts of these potentials when @xmath19 is replaced by @xmath20 .
notice the coalescing of eigenvalues at special values of @xmath19 , these special values are called eps . also note that at or around the eps , the evolution of eigenvalues in dashed lines does not show any special feature .
so the spectra of hermitian and their complex pt - symmetric counterparts do not relate to each other well , excepting for very small values of @xmath19 where the eigenvalues of both coincide approximately . in fig .
3 - 5 , we present the variation of eigenvalues when the distance between wells in fig .
1(a , b , c ) is increased slowly .
the blue lines present the coalescing of two levels when the total potential is mildly complex pt - symmetric ( @xmath19 is small ) .
see the dashed red lines for hermitian double - well ( @xmath54 ) representing merging of two levels .
green dotted and blue dot - dashed lines arise when non - hermiticity parameter becomes large , then the coalesced levels are not contained between the merging levels ( red dashed lines ) .
lastly , we conclude that the models discussed here bring the spectral phenomena of coalescing and merging of energy levels closer , however we know that they occur in two different domains : hermitian and complex pt - symmetric .
further investigations in this regard are welcome . | [ 30 ] e. merzbacher , _ quantum mechanics _ , wiley new york : wiley , 1970 pp 12839 .
z. ahmed , s. kumar , m. sharma and v. sharma , eur .
* 37 * ( 2016 ) 045406 .
z. ahmed , s. pavaskar , d. sharma and l. prakash , arxiv : 1508.00661 [ quant - ph ] . t. kato , perturbation theory of linear operators , springer , new york ( 1980 ) .
z. ahmed , phys .
lett . a * 282 * , 343 ( 2001 ) ; 295 * 287*(2001 ) .
z. ahmed , phys .
a * 364 * , 12 ( 2007 ) . z. ahmed , pramana j. phys * 73 * , 323 ( 2009 ) ; f.m .
fernandez , arxiv:1512.09326 .
[ quant - ph ] . | merzbacher quantum mechanics wiley new york 1970 pp 12839 z ahmed kumar m. sharma v. sharma 37 2016 ) 045406 ahmed pavaskar d. sharma l prakash arxiv 1508.00661 quant - ph t kato perturbation theory linear operators springer new 1980 ) ahmed phys 282 343 2001 ) 295 287(2001 ) 364 12 2007 ) pramana 73 323 2009 ) f fernandez arxiv:1512.09326 quant - ph | 0.069142 | 236 | 128 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,410 | we discuss the evolution of clustering of galaxies in the universe from the present epoch back to @xmath0 , using the first - epoch data from the vimos - vlt deep survey ( vvds ) .
we present the evolution of the projected two - point correlation function of galaxies for the global galaxy population , as well as its dependence on galaxy intrinsic luminosities and spectral types . while we do not find strong variations of the correlation function parameters with redshift for the global galaxy population , the clustering of objects with different intrinsic luminosities evolved significantly during last 8 - 10 billion years .
our findings indicate that bright galaxies in the past traced higher density peaks than they do now and that the shape of the correlation function of most luminous galaxies is different from observed for their local counterparts , which is a supporting evidence of a non - trivial evolution of the galaxy vs. dark matter bias . according to the current paradigm
, galaxies formed and evolved inside dark matter halos , which merged and grew under the effect of gravity @xcite .
understanding the galaxy clustering may be the key to understand the evolution of the universe itself .
it is therefore an important issue of contemporary cosmology to follow the evolution of galaxy clustering in the past and to understand the bias between the galaxy distribution and the underlying dark matter density field , and how it depends on galaxy types , luminosities and local environment .
we explored these issuees using the unique set of data from the vimos - vlt deep survey , which is strictly selected in magnitude in the range @xmath1 , from a complete deep photometric survey , without any color selection @xcite .
the first - epoch vvds data contain in total 11564 galaxies with measured spectroscopic redshifts up to @xmath2 , making it an ideal tool to investigate the galaxy clustering in a broad range of time .
here we describe briefly our results on the evolution of the clustering properties of the general vvds galaxy population and the dependence of clustering on galaxy luminosities , types and colors .
we measure the galaxy 2-point spatial correlation function @xmath3 and project it along the line of sight to obtainthe function @xmath4 .
the best power - law fit to @xmath4 gives us the correlation length @xmath5 and the slope of a correlation function , @xmath6 ( details in * ? ? ?
* ) . | for the general population of vvds galaxies we find @xmath5 roughly constant with a low value of @xmath7 @xmath8 mpc for @xmath9 $ ] , to @xmath10 @xmath8 mpc for @xmath11 $ ] .
this - seemingly surprising - lack of evolution may be understood when we take into account that we are dealing with a mixture of galaxies of different types and luminosities at different redshifts . at low z
we observe mainly a low - luminosity , weakly clustered population . at high z , where we theoretically expect to observe galaxies
to be less clustered than today , we probe only the most luminous , most massive and most clustered objects .
luminosity - dependence of galaxy clustering at @xmath12 is clearly different with what is observed in the nearby universe .
the clustering strength is rising around the characteristic schechter luminosity @xmath13 , with a sharper turn than observed at low redshifts .
additionally , the slope of the correlation function steepens from @xmath14 to @xmath15 .
this is caused by a significant change in the shape of @xmath4 , increasingly deviating from a power - law for the most luminous samples , with a strong upturn at small ( @xmath16 @xmath8 mpc ) scales ( see left panel of figure [ pol1:fig1 ] ) .
this trend , not observed locally , results also in a visible scale - dependence of the relative bias , @xmath17 ( shown in the right panel of figure [ pol1:fig1 ] ) and seems to imply a significant change in the way luminous galaxies trace dark - matter halos at @xmath18 with respect to the present - day universe .
as shown in the left panel of figure [ pol1:fig2 ] , the clustering of galaxies of early spectral types is stronger than that of late - type galaxies at all redshifts up to @xmath19 . at @xmath20
, early - type galaxies display a correlation length @xmath210.9 h@xmath22mpc , while late types have @xmath230.4 h@xmath22mpc .
the relative bias between early- and late - type galaxies remains approximately constant with @xmath24 from @xmath25 to @xmath26 .
similarly , as shown in the right panel of figure [ pol1:fig2 ] , red - sequence galaxies exhibit a larger clustering length than the blue ones with little dependence on redshift .
these results @xcite are consistent with a scenario where the assembly of the most luminous early - type galaxies is practically completed at @xmath12 , with however luminous star - forming objects being nearly as clustered as red galaxies for @xmath27 larger than @xmath28 .
all the above - mentioned measurements are pieces of a puzzle which still have to be fit into the theoretical scheme of gravitational instability scenario , where dark matter halos assemble under the effect of gravity and galaxies form and evolve inside them .
our observations represent an important constraint for models trying to reproduce galaxy clustering , especially at small , non - linear scales .
this research has been developed within the framework of the vvds consortium .
this work has been partially supported by the cnrs - insu and its programme national de cosmologie ( france ) , and by italian ministry ( miur ) grants cofin2000 ( mm02037133 ) and cofin2003 ( num.2003020150 ) .
the vlt - vimos observations have been carried out on guaranteed time ( gto ) allocated by the european southern observatory ( eso ) to the virmos consortium , under a contractual agreement between the centre national de la recherche scientifique of france , heading a consortium of french and italian institutes , and eso , to design , manufacture and test the vimos instrument .
le fvre , o. vettolani , g. , garilli , b. et al . , 2005 , a&a , 439 , 845 le fvre , guzzo , l. , meneux , b. et al . , 2005 ,
a&a , 439 , 877 meneux , b. , guzzo , l. , le fvre et al . , 2006 , a&a , 452 , 387 norberg , p. , baugh , c.m . ,
haekins , e. et al . , 2002 , , 332 , 827 pollo , a. , meneux , a. guzzo , l. , et al . , 2005 , a&a , 439 , 887 pollo , a. , guzzo , l. , le fvre , o. , et al . , 2006 ,
a&a , 451 , 409 white , s.d.m . & rees , m.j . , 1978 , mnras , 183 , 341 zehavi , i. , zheng , z. , weinberg , d.h .
et al . , 2005 ,
apj , 630 , | general population vvds galaxies @xmath5 constant low value @xmath7 @xmath8 mpc @xmath9 $ to @xmath10 mpc @xmath11 $ lack of evolution understood mixture galaxies different types luminosities at different redshifts low z low - luminosity weakly clustered population high z less clustered probe most luminous massive clustered objects luminosity - dependence galaxy clustering at @xmath12 different nearby universe clustering strength rising around schechter luminosity @xmath13 sharper turn low redshifts slope correlation function steepens from @xmath14 to @xmath15 caused significant change in shape of @xmath4 deviating from power - law for most luminous samples strong upturn at small @xmath16 @xmath8 mpc ) scales trend results visible scale - dependence of relative bias , @xmath17 significant change in luminous galaxies trace dark - matter halos at @xmath18 clustering of galaxies early spectral types stronger late - type galaxies at redshifts up to @xmath19 @xmath20 early - type galaxies display correlation length @xmath210.9 h@xmath22mpc late types @xmath230.4 h@xmath22mpc relative bias between early late galaxies constant with @xmath24 to @xmath26 red - sequence galaxies larger clustering length than blue ones little dependence on redshift results consistent with assembly luminous early - type galaxies completed at @xmath12 luminous star - forming objects nearly as clustered as red galaxies for @xmath27 larger than @xmath28 measurements pieces puzzle into gravitational instability scenario dark matter halos assemble galaxies form evolve observations represent constraint for models galaxy clustering small non - linear scales research developed vvds consortium supported by cnrs - insu programme national de cosmologie italian ministry grants cofin2000 cofin2003 vlt - vimos observations carried on guaranteed time allocated by european southern observatory to virmos consortium under contractual agreement between centre national de la recherche scientifique of france eso design manufacture test vimos instrument2005 a&a 439 845 le fvre guzzo l. meneux b. 2005 439 877 meneux guzzo l. fvre 2006 a&a 452 387 norberg p baugh c.m haekins e. 2002 332 , 827 pollo a meneux guzzo l. 2005 a&a 439 887 pollo guzzo l. le fvre. 2006 a&a 451 , 409 white s.d.m. rees m.j 1978 mnras 183 , 341 zehavi zheng z. weinberg d.h 2005 apj 630 | 0.181332 | 1,076 | 566 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,413 | sequential compressive sensing , which may be widely used in sensing devices , is a popular topic of recent research .
this paper proposes an online recovery algorithm for sparse approximation of sequential compressive sensing .
several techniques including warm start , fast iteration , and variable step size are adopted in the proposed algorithm to improve its online performance .
finally , numerical simulations demonstrate its better performance than the relative art .
* keywords : * compressive sensing , sparse signal recovery , sequential , online algorithm , zero - point attracting projection | compressive sensing ( cs ) @xcite is a recently proposed concept that enables sampling below nyquist rate , without ( or with little ) sacrificing reconstruction quality . based on exploiting the signal sparsity in typical domains ,
cs methods can be used in the sensing devices , such as mr imaging @xcite and ad conversion @xcite , where the devices have a high cost of acquiring each additional sample or a high requirement on time .
therefore , as the sparsity level is often not known a priori , it can be very challenging to use cs in practical sensing hardware .
sequential compressive sensing @xcite can effectively deal with the above problems .
sequential cs considers a scenario where the observations can be obtained in sequence , and computations with observations are performed to decide whether these samples are enough .
consequently , it is allowed to recover the signal either exactly or to a given tolerance from the smallest possible number of observations .
there have been several recovery algorithms for sequential cs .
asif @xcite solved the problem by homotopy method .
garrigues @xcite discussed the lasso problem with sequential observations .
this work extends a recent proposed zero - point attracting projection ( zap ) algorithm @xcite to the scenario of sequential cs .
zap employs an approximate @xmath0 norm as the sparsity constraint and updates in the solution space . comparing with the existing algorithms , it needs fewer measurements and lower computation complexity .
therefore the new algorithm can provide a much more appropriate solution for practical sensing devices , which is validated by numerical simulations .
suppose @xmath1 is an unknown sparse signal , which is @xmath2-length but has only @xmath3 nonzero entries , where @xmath4 .
in their ice - breaking contributions , candes et al suggested to measure @xmath1 with under - determined observations , i.e. @xmath5 , where @xmath6 consists of random entries and has much fewer rows than columns .
they also proved that @xmath0 norm or @xmath7 norm constraint optimization can successfully recover the unknown signal with overwhelming probability , @xmath8 there are many methods proposed to solve ( [ problem ] ) , of which concerned in this work is zap .
zap iteratively searches the sparsest result in solution space .
the recursion starts from the least square optimal solution , @xmath9 , where @xmath10 denotes the pseudo - inverse matrix of @xmath11 . in the @xmath12th iteration ,
the solution is first updated along the negative gradient direction of a sparse penalty , @xmath13 where @xmath14 denotes a sparse constraint function and @xmath15 denotes the step size . in the reference , an approximate @xmath0 norm is employed and the corresponding @xmath16th entry of @xmath17 is @xmath18 where @xmath19 is a controlling parameter and it is readily recognized that the penalty tends to @xmath0 norm as @xmath19 approaches to infinity . then @xmath20 is projected back to the solution space to satisfy the observation constraint , @xmath21 where @xmath22 is defined as projection matrix and @xmath23 .
equation ( [ za ] ) appears that an attractor locates at the zero - point is pulling the iterative solution to be sparser , as explains the first part of the algorithm s name .
the last part comes from ( [ projection ] ) , which means that @xmath20 is projected back to the solution space . imagining a scenario that the samples are measured in realtime . at time
@xmath24 , an @xmath24-length measurement vector @xmath25 is collected and utilized to solve the sparsest solution by ( [ problem ] ) .
if the available measurements are not enough to recover the original sparse signal , a new sample @xmath26 is generated at time @xmath27 , where @xmath28 denotes the sampling weight vector .
thus the problem becomes solving @xmath29 , where @xmath30,\qquad { \bf a}_{m+1}=\left[{\bf a}_m \atop { \bf a}_{m+1}^{\rm t}\right].\ ] ] obviously , it is a waste of resources if the recovery algorithm is re - initialized without the utilization of earlier estimate , i.e. the available result at time @xmath24 .
consequently , the basic aim of sequential compressive signal reconstruction is to find an effective method of refining @xmath31 based on the information of @xmath32 .
for conciseness , the detailed iteration procedure of online zap is provided in tab.[tab1 ] .
it can be seen that online zap has two recursions .
the inner iteration is to update the solution by zap with the given measurements .
the outer iteration is for sequential input . in order to improve the performance ,
several techniques are used in online zap and they are discussed in the following subsections .
.the procedure of online zap [ cols= " < " , ] zap works in an iterative way to produce a sparse solution via recursion in the solution space . in the online scenario , the previous estimate can be used to initialize the incoming iteration , i.e. @xmath33 , where @xmath34 denotes the maximum iteration number at time @xmath24 .
the pseudo - inverse matrix @xmath35 plays an important role in the recursion of ( [ projection ] ) . considering the high computational cost of matrix inverse operation , @xmath35 is generally prepared before iterations .
however , in the online scenario , @xmath36 becomes time - dependent and @xmath37 need to be recalculated in each time instant . in order to reduce the complexity ,
the pseudo - inverse matrix is updated iteratively .
define @xmath38 , which is already available after time @xmath24 .
consequently , as the new sample is arriving , using basic algebra one has the recursion @xmath39\left[{\bf a}_m^{\rm t } \ ; { \bf a}_{m+1}\right]\right]^{-1 } = \left[\begin{matrix}{\bf\gamma}_{m}^{-1 } & { \boldsymbol\alpha}_m \\ { \boldsymbol\alpha}_m^{\rm t } & \beta_m\end{matrix}\right]^{-1}\nonumber\\ & = \left[\begin{matrix}{\bf\gamma}_m+\theta_m{\bf\gamma}_m { \boldsymbol\alpha}_m{\boldsymbol\alpha}_m^{\rm t}{\bf\gamma}_m & -\theta_m{\bf\gamma}_m{\boldsymbol\alpha}_m\\ -\theta_m{\boldsymbol\alpha}_m^{\rm t}{\bf\gamma}_m & \theta_m\end{matrix}\right],\label{updategamma}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath40 as the step size in gradient descent iterations , the parameter @xmath15 controls a tradeoff between the speed of convergence and the accuracy of the solution . in order to improve the performances of the proposed algorithm ,
the idea of variable step size is taken into consideration .
the control scheme is rather direct : @xmath15 is initialized to be a large value after new sample arrived , and reduced by a factor as long as the iteration is convergent .
the reduction is repeated several times until @xmath15 is sufficiently small .
since the algorithm has two recursions , we employ @xmath41 and @xmath42 to denote the decreasing speed of outer and inner iteration , respectively . in addition
, @xmath15 is no longer decreased when the step size is rather small .
there are two kinds of recursions requiring stop rules in the online zap algorithm .
firstly , after the @xmath24th sample arrived , @xmath43 iterates with @xmath12 to produce the best estimate based on the @xmath24 measurements .
the inner iteration should stop after the algorithm reaches steady state , which means the sparsity penalty starts increasing .
consequently , the inner recursion stops ( a ) when the number of reductions of @xmath15 reaches one-@xmath44th of its initial value or ( b ) when the number of iterations reaches the bound @xmath45 . secondly , as soon as the sparse signal is successfully reconstructed , the following samples are no longer necessary and the sensing procedure stops .
therefore , the outer recursion stops when the estimate error is below a particular value @xmath46 .
computer simulation is presented in this section to verify the performance of the proposed algorithm compared with typical sequential cs reconstruction algorithm for solving bpdn problem @xcite , whose matlab code can be downloaded from the website @xcite . in the following experiment ,
the entries of each row of @xmath6 are independently generated from normal distribution .
the locations of @xmath3 nonzero coefficients of sparse signal @xmath1 are randomly chosen with uniform distribution @xmath47 $ ] .
the corresponding nonzero coefficients are gaussian with mean zero and unit variance .
the system parameters are @xmath48 and @xmath49 .
the number of measurements @xmath50 increases form @xmath51 to @xmath52 .
the parameters for bpdn are set as the recommended values by the author .
the parameters for online zap are @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 .
the simulation is repeated ten times , then mean square derivation ( msd ) between the original signal and reconstruction signal as well as the average running time calculated .
figure [ varm ] shows msd curve according to @xmath50 . as can be seen ,
the performance of zap is better than that of bpdn .
when the sparse signal is recovered successfully , the number of measurements bpdn needs is larger than @xmath59 , while the number zap algorithm needs is less than 80 .
figure [ time ] demonstrates the cpu running time as @xmath50 increases .
again , zap has the better performance .
the cpu time of bpdn is twice than that of zap for successful recovery ( according to fig.[varm ] , here @xmath50 is chosen as @xmath59 for comparison ) .
we have introduced in this paper a new online signal reconstruction algorithm for sequential compressive sensing .
the proposed algorithm extends zap to sequential scenario . and
in order to improve the performance , some methods , including the warm start and variable step size , are adopted .
the final experiment indicates that the proposed algorithm needs less measurements and less cpu time than the reference algorithm .
d. l. donoho , `` compressed sensing , '' _ ieee trans . on information theory _ , 52(4 ) , pp.1289 - 1306 , april 2006 .
e. candes , j. romberg , and t. tao , `` robust uncertainty principles : exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , '' _ ieee trans .
inform . theory _ , 52:489 - 509 , 2006 . m. lustig , d. donoho , and j. pauly , `` sparse mri : the application of compressed sensing for rapid mr imaging , '' _ magnetic resonance in medicine _ , 58(6 ) pp .
1182 - 1195 , december 2007 . m. mishali , y. c. eldar , and j. a. tropp , `` efficient sampling of sparse wideband analog signals , '' _ ccit report # 705 _ , october 2008 .
d. malioutov , s. sanghavi , and a. willsky , `` compressed sensing with sequential observations , '' _ icassp _ , pp .
3357 - 3360 , april 2008 .
j. jin , y. gu , and s. mei , `` a stochastic gradient approach on compressive sensing signal reconstruction based on adaptive filtering framework , '' _ ieee journal of selected topics in signal processing _ , 4(2 ) , pp.409 - 420 , 2010 . | compressive sensing cs ) @xcite proposed enables sampling below nyquist rate without sacrificing reconstruction quality signal sparsity cs methods used in sensing devices mr imaging ad conversion high cost high requirement on time sparsity level not known challenging to use cs in practical sensing hardware sequential compressive sensing @xcite problems considers scenario observations obtained in sequence computations performed recover signal or tolerance from smallest number observations several recovery algorithms for asif @xcite solved homotopy method garrigues @xcite discussed lasso problem with sequential observations work extends zero - point attracting projection zap algorithm @xcite to sequential cs zap employs @xmath0 norm sparsity constraint updates solution space needs fewer measurements lower computation complexity new algorithm appropriate solution for practical sensing devices validated by numerical simulations @xmath1 unknown sparse signal @xmath2-length only @xmath3 nonzero entries @xmath4 candes et al suggested measure @xmath1 with under - determined observations @xmath5 @xmath6 random entries fewer rows columnsproved @xmath0 or @xmath7 norm constraint optimization recover unknown signal probability @xmath8 many methods solve problem concerned zap searches sparsest result solution space recursion starts from least square optimal solution @xmath9 @xmath10 pseudo - inverse matrix @xmath11 @xmath12th iteration solution updated along negative gradient direction sparse penalty @xmath13 @xmath14 sparse constraint function @xmath15 step size approximate @xmath0 norm employed @xmath16th entry @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 controlling parameter penalty tends to @xmath0 norm as @xmath19 approaches infinity @xmath20 projected back to solution space observation constraint @xmath21 @xmath22 projection matrix @xmath23 equation attractor at zero - point iterative solution sparser algorithm projection @xmath20 projected back to solution space samples measured realtime @xmath24 @xmath24-length measurement vector @xmath25 collected solve sparsest solution if measurements not enough recover original sparse signal new sample @xmath26 generated @xmath27 @xmath28 sampling weight vectorproblem becomes solving @xmath29 @xmath30,\qquad { \bf a}_{m+1}=\left\bf} \atop { \bf a}_{m+1}^{\rm t}\right waste of resources if recovery algorithm re - initialized without earlier estimate available result at @xmath24 aim of sequential compressive signal reconstruction refining @xmath31 based on information @xmath32 detailed iteration procedure of online zap in tab.[tab1 ] zap two recursions inner iteration solution measurements outer iteration for sequential input improve performance techniques used in online zap discussed in subsections procedure online zap sparse solution via recursion previous estimate initialize incoming iteration @xmath33 @xmath34 maximum iteration number at @xmath24 pseudo - inverse matrix @xmath35 important in recursion high computational cost of matrix inverse operation @xmath35 prepared before iterations @xmath36 time - dependent @xmath37 recalculated each reduce complexity pseudo - inverse matrix updated iteratively define @xmath38 available after @xmath24new sample arriving basic algebra recursion @xmath39\left{\bf a}_m^{\rm t } {m+1}\right^{-1 }\begin{matrix{\bf\gamma}_{m}^{-1 } \boldsymbol\alpha}_m_m^{\rm t } \beta_m\end{matrix}^{-1}\nonumber\\{matrix{\bf\gamma}_m+\theta_m\gamma \boldsymbol\alpha}{\rm t -\theta_m -\theta_m_m^{\rm t}\bf\gamma}_m \theta_m\end{matrix}\right{updategamma}\end{aligned} @xmath40 step size gradient descent iterations parameter @xmath15 controls tradeoff speed convergence accuracy solution improve performances algorithm variable step size control scheme @xmath15 initialized large value after new sample reduced factor iteration convergent reduction repeated until @xmath15 small algorithm two recursions @xmath41 and @xmath42 decreasing speed outer inner iteration@xmath15 no decreased when step size small two recursions stop rules in online zap algorithm after @xmath24th sample @xmath43 iterates with @xmath12 best estimate @xmath24 measurements iteration after algorithm steady state sparsity penalty recursion stops when reductions of @xmath15 reaches one-@xmath44th initial value or iterations reaches @xmath45 sparse signal reconstructed samples necessary sensing procedure stops outer recursion stops when estimate error below value @xmath46 computer simulation performance algorithm sequential cs reconstruction algorithm bpdn problem @xcite entries of row @xmath6 independently generated from normal distribution locations of @xmath3 nonzero coefficients of sparse signal @xmath1 randomly chosen with uniform distribution nonzero coefficients gaussian with mean zero unit variance system parameters are @xmath48 and @xmath49 number of measurements @xmath50 increases form @xmath51 to @xmath52 parameters for bpdn set as recommended values author parameters for online zap are @xmath53simulation repeated ten times mean derivation original reconstruction signal average running time calculated figure shows msd curve @xmath50 performance zap better than bpdn sparse signal recovered measurements bpdn needs larger than @xmath59 zap needs less than 80 figure cpu running time @xmath50 increases zap better performance cpu time bpdn twice zap for successful recovery @xmath50 chosen as @xmath59 comparison introduced new online signal reconstruction algorithm for sequential compressive sensing algorithm extends zap to sequential scenario improve performance methods warm start variable step size adopted final experiment indicates proposed algorithm needs less measurements less cpu time reference algorithm donoho compressed sensing theory 52(4 ) pp.1289 - 1306 april 2006 candes romberg tao robust uncertainty principles exact signal reconstruction from incomplete frequency information 52:489 - 509 2006 lustig donoho pauly sparse mri application compressed sensing for rapid imaging magnetic resonance in medicine 58(6 ) pp 1182 - 1195 december 2007 mishali eldartropp efficient sampling wideband analog signals ccit report 705 october 2008 malioutov sanghavi willsky compressed sensing sequential observations icassp 3357 - 3360 april 2008 jin gu mei stochastic gradient approach compressive sensing signal reconstruction adaptive filtering framework journal signal processing 4(2.409 - 420 2010 | 0.43085 | 2,560 | 1,320 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,418 | extracting stellar fundamental parameters from spectro - interferometric ( spi ) data requires reliable estimates of observables and with robust uncertainties ( visibility , triple product , phase closure ) .
a number of fine calibration procedures is necessary throughout the reduction process .
testing departures from centro - symmetry of brightness distributions is a useful complement . developing a set of automatic routines , called _ spidast _
( made available to the community ) to reduce , calibrate and interpret raw data sets of instantaneous spectro - interferograms at the spectral channel level , we complement ( and in some respects improve ) the ones contained in the _ amdlib _ data reduction software .
our new software _
spidast _ is designed to work in an automatic mode , free from subjective choices , while being versatile enough to suit various processing strategies .
_ spidast _ performs the following automated operations : weighting of non - aberrant spi data ( visibility , triple product ) , fine spectral calibration ( sub - pixel level ) , accurate and robust determinations of stellar diameters for calibrator sources ( and their uncertainties as well ) , correction for the degradations of the interferometer response in visibility and triple product , calculation of the centro - symmetry parameter ( csp ) from the calibrated triple product , fit of parametric chromatic models on spi observables , to extract model parameters .
_ spidast _ is currently applied to the scientific study of 18 cool giant and supergiant stars , observed with the vlti / amber facility at medium resolution in the k band . because part of their calibrators have no diameter in the current catalogs , _
spidast _ provides new determinations of the angular diameters of all calibrators .
comparison of _ spidast _ final calibrated observables with _ amdlib _
determinations shows good agreement , under good and poor seeing conditions .
[ firstpage ] methods : data analysis techniques : interferometric stars : late - type | the power of optical - infrared interferometry to obtain information about the astronomical source morphology ( including the angular size ) is now well - established . to properly determine the source properties ,
the quality of the measurements is an issue , which is still the subject of active research . as with any other measuring apparatus ,
the absolute calibration of the instrument ( including atmosphere ) requires careful attention .
derived from the measurement of the mutual degree of coherence of the incident radiation field , on spatial frequencies sampled by the aperture - array configuration , the final interferometric observables are non - linear mixes of noisy quantities , and of parameter estimates with their own uncertainties . in this paper , we propose to revisit and extend the existing data processing and calibration methods , in the aim to obtain reliable estimates and robust uncertainties for calibrated measurements of visibility and complex triple product .
the careful reduction process , described in the present paper , has been elaborated for the scientific study of a sample of 18 bright cool giant and supergiant stars ( see table [ tabscience ] ) .
measurements were obtained with the vlti / amber facility at medium spectral resolution ( @xmath0=1500 ) in the @xmath1 band , using triplets of 1.80-m auxiliary telescopes .
observations have been conducted during 15 observing nights between may 2009 and december 2010 ( under belgian visa guaranteed time ) .
the aim of the present work is to test the data reduction and calibration software , on data with various qualities , that we started to develop in 2006 .
.science targets of our programme measured with vlti / amber .
hipparcos parallaxes are in mas .
last column gives the calibrator(s ) associated with each science target . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] when the positive and negative values of @xmath2 along the spectral domain almost mutually compensate ( as seen on fig .
[ csplambda ] for tx psc and w ori ) , the spectral integration produces a nearly null global closure phase . as mentioned above , this can be taken as a hint for centro - symmetry .
however , @xmath2 is clearly non - null in some parts of the spectrum , and this is a hint for a deviation from centro - symmetry . to rule out the contradiction , and
so as to consider this latter possibility , we introduce a new estimator , that we call the _ centro - symmetry parameter _ ( csp ) , similar to the global closure phase , but using instead the absolute value of @xmath2 in the numerator , and the modulus of @xmath3 in the denominator , @xmath4 as for the global closure phase , a small csp value ( less than , for our sample ) suggests a high degree of centro - symmetry .
significantly high csp values , as judged from their uncertainties ( bootstrap method again ) , require to use asymmetric brightness distribution models , for the fitting on the spi data .
the values of the global csp in the @xmath1-band , and their uncertainties , are given in the second column of table [ tabcspclos ] .
, the global closure phase in @xmath1 , for the science targets .
the red inset in the upper right corner enlarges the group of points located at the bottom , around the null value of the global closure phase , pertaining to the targets @xmath5 oph , @xmath6 car , l@xmath7 pup , @xmath8 cet , @xmath9 ara , @xmath6 tra , and @xmath6 hya .
the dash - dot - dash diagonals trace the relation csp = @xmath10 . ] to illustrate the difference between the global closure phase and the csp , we plot in fig .
[ csplambda ] three quantities , for 3 scientific targets showing a global closure phase close to zero , 1 . in the panels on the left
is shown the imaginary part of the triple product @xmath11 , divided by the spectral mean ] of the real part @xmath12 .
note that the spectral mean of this ratio is equal to the tangent of the global closure phase , as defined in eq .
( [ psifact ] ) ; 2 . in the panels forming the central column
is shown the absolute value of the imaginary part of the triple product @xmath13 , divided by the spectral mean of the modulus @xmath14 .
note that the spectral mean of this ratio is equal to the sine of the global csp , as defined in eq .
( [ csptrip ] ) ; 3 .
in the panels on the right is shown the absolute value of the real part of the triple product @xmath15 , divided by the spectral mean of the modulus @xmath14 .
the three panels on the left show three typical behaviours for @xmath11 : 1 . uniformly close to zero ( @xmath5 oph ) ; 2 . decreasing symmetrically around zero ( tx psc ) ; 3 .
increasing symmetrically around zero ( w ori ) .
for each of these situations , the integration over the spectrum produces a nearly null result ( hint for centro - symmetry ) .
however the csp allows to detect deviations from centro - symmetry ( see fig .
[ fig : psicsp ] ) .
if the real and imaginary parts of the triple product are wavelength - independent , for the observation spectral range , one can show that @xmath16 .
if not , no analytical relation linking the two quantities can be derived from eqs .
( [ psifact ] ) and ( [ csptrip ] ) , because of the integrals in the numerators and the denominators .
figure [ fig : psicsp ] shows the csp in @xmath1 displayed versus the global closure phase in the same spectral band , for each science target , choosing the ob which gives the smallest uncertainty on the csp .
almost all the stars fall along the diagonals of the ( @xmath17 , csp ) diagram , which trace the relation csp = @xmath18 .
one ( w ori ) , however , is flagged as asymmetrical with the csp indicator , but not with @xmath17 .
this is precisely why we favour the csp over @xmath17 , as discussed above .
t cet has the largest values for csp and @xmath17 as well , indicating large deviation from centro - symmetry ( may be due to strong asymmetries at the wavelengths of the co bands or even suggestive of the presence of a binary companion ) .
the second largest csp value pertains to r scl , recently revealed as a wide binary by @xcite , using the alma array at millimetric wavelengths . in addition
, the last column of table [ tabcspclos ] shows that , except for t cet , the snr for the csp is comparable or larger than the snr for the global closure phase .
in order to interpret the final calibrated spi observables , _ spidast _ provides a fitting routine , based on the modified gradient - expansion algorithm , very similar to the algorithm invented by @xcite , and improved by @xcite .
the fit applies on any calibrated spi measurements ( to be chosen between visibility , flux , coherent flux , bispectrum , triple product , and closure phase ) , using a library of single - component or composite parametric chromatic models , characterised by the fourier spectrum of their intensity distribution , and the associated first - order partial derivatives w.r.t .
the model parameters . figure [ figdelophfit ] shows examples of visibility - fitting results obtained with _
spidast _ , using two models ( ud and ld - marcs ) .
this fitting routine , applied on spectro - photometric data , is used to determine the calibrator angular diameters from the marcs + turbospectrum synthetic spectra ( see subsect .
[ subseccaldiam ] ) .
note that the _ litpro _ software , developed by the jmmc working group `` model fitting '' , uses a set of elementary geometrical and center - to - limb darkening functions , as well @xcite .
however , it does not offer , contrary to _ spidast _ , the possibility to fit stellar - disk models with synthetic tabulated radiance data ( or exitance , for fits on spectro - photometric measurements ) , such those produced by the marcs + turbospectrum code .
since the uncertainties of the final calibrated data are not normally distributed , the covariance matrix , that comes out of the chi - squared fit , can not be used to infer the parameter uncertainties @xcite . to compute the uncertainties , _ spidast _ uses the residual - bootstrap method , described in detail in @xcite : 1 .
`` synthetic '' datasets are produced from random sampling with replacement of the pearson residuals ( difference between calibrated and fitted values divided by the uncertainty of the observed value ) , added to the initial fitted values ; 2 .
fitting the model on these new datasets produces a set of chi - squared minima , following a probability distribution , from which we extract the boundaries of the confidence interval , with a given confidence level ; 3 .
the parameter values associated with these chi - squared boundaries give the upper and lower limits of the parameter estimates , leading to asymmetric uncertainties .
the whole procedure allows the computing of reliable estimates of the parameter uncertainties .
in the present paper , we introduce the new _ spidast _ software , developed since 2006 with the aim to reduce , calibrate , and interpret the visibility and triple product measurements obtained with the vlti / amber facility .
_ spidast _ contains a whole set of modules , which can be launched separately or in an automatic batch file , and summarised herafter : 1 . the raw data reduction used by _
spidast _ computes the weighted average of non - aberrant data , at spectral - channel level , providing estimates of the spi observables using an automated procedure , while the method presently used with _
amdlib _ selects the `` best '' frames according to a quality threshold determined _ a posteriori _ , after several trials .
2 . the wavelength calibration procedure performed by _
spidast _ provides spectral shifts following a polynomial law , tracing them at the channel level .
this is done by computing the cross - correlation of the measured spectra of the calibrators with their synthetic spectra produced by the marcs model , while _ amdlib _ only provides a constant spectral shift over the spectrum , from the correlation with the telluric lines .
3 . for selected calibrators
not included in the calibrator catalogues , _ spidast _ provides several routines for estimation of the angular diameter with indirect methods , the most accurate being the fit of stellar - atmosphere model spectra given by marcs on spectro - photometric data .
the calibrator synthetic observables are derived using clv functions produced by marcs .
4 . to obtain an accurate interferometric calibration ( via an automated procedure ) , _ spidast _ : ( 1 ) divides the calibrator raw data with the associated synthetic observables in each spectral channel , which gives the instrumental response function in squared visibility and triple product ; ( 2 ) interpolates or fits the response at the time of each exposure on the science target ; ( 3 ) divides the science raw data with the interpolated / fitted response , which gives the science calibrated observables for each exposure ; ( 4 ) computes their weighted average over each ob . at each processing step , the uncertainties are computed thanks to the bootstrap method applied on the weighted means .
5 . using the real and imaginary parts of the calibrated triple product , _ spidast _
measures the deviation from centro - symmetry of the brightness distribution of each science target in the observation spectral band , thanks to a new parameter , more sensitive to asymmetries than the global closure phase .
6 . finally , _
spidast _ proposes a complete fitting tool , using a set of parametric and chromatic models , and accepting input tables of flux / intensity synthetic data .
such a careful calibration process of spi data is a crucial step for their trustworthy astrophysical exploitation , which is the topic of two associated papers @xcite .
parameter extraction using non - linear fits of source model , as well as aperture - synthesis image reconstruction , need reliable estimates of the calibrated observables , with robust uncertainties .
our reduction , calibration , and fitting routines also apply to any other spectral datasets , including spectroscopic data .
we made the _
spidast _ software public : the source code of any program of our software suite can be obtained by sending an e - mail to the first author of the present paper .
the authors thank the eso - paranal vlti team for supporting their amber observations , especially the night astronomers a. mrand , g. montagnier , f. patru , j .- b .
le bouquin , s. rengaswamy , and w.j .
de wit , the vlti group coordinator s. brillant , and the telescope and instrument operators a. and j. cortes , a. pino , c. herrera , d. castex , s. cerda , and c. cid .
they also thank the programme national de physique stellaire ( pnps ) for supporting part of this collaborative research .
is grateful to b. plez , k. eriksson , and t. masseron for their ongoing support on the use of the marcs code .
s.s . was ( partly ) supported by the austrian science fund through fwf project p19503-n16 ; a.c . is post - doctoral fellow from f.r.s .- fnrs ( belgium ; grant 2.4513.11 ) ; e.p . is supported by prodex .
the data were partially reduced using the publicly available data reduction software package _ amdlib _
, kindly provided by the jean - marie mariotti center .
this study used the simbad and vizier databases at the cds , strasbourg ( france ) , and nasas ads bibliographic services .
s. , mella g. , bonneau d. , et al .
, 2010 , in w. c. danchi et al . ed . , optical and infrared interferometry ii vol .
7734 of spie conf .
, building the jmmc stellar diameters catalog using searchcal .
san diego , ca s. , mrand a. , le bouquin j .- b .
, et al . , 2011 , in the origin and fate of the sun : evolution of solar - mass stars observed with high angular resolution problems of the amber wavelength calibration . to be published , garching b. mnchen , germany i. , tallon m. , thibaut e. , et al . , 2008 , in optical and infrared interferometry vol
7013 of spie conf .
, litpro : a model fitting software for optical interferometry .
marseille , france , pp 70131j-170131j-9 | optical - infrared interferometry information astronomical source morphology including angular size established source properties quality of measurements issue subject of active research absolute calibration requires attention derived from incident radiation field frequencies final interferometric observables are non - linear mixes of noisy quantities parameter estimates with uncertainties propose to revisit extend data processing calibration methods obtain reliable estimates robust uncertainties for calibrated measurements of visibility complex triple product careful reduction process elaborated for study of 18 bright cool giant supergiant stars measurements obtained with vlti / amber facility at medium spectral resolution ( @xmath0=1500 ) @xmath1 band using 1.80-m auxiliary telescopes observations conducted during 15 nights between may 2009 and december 2010 aim test data reduction calibration software on data with various qualities in 2006 .science targets measured with vlti / amber hipparcos parallaxes in mas calibrator(s ) associated with each science target positive and negative values of @xmath2 spectral domain compensate figcsplambda ] tx psc w ori spectral integration produces nearly null global closure phase hint for centro - symmetry @xmath2 non - null some parts hint for deviation from centro - symmetry introduce new estimator centro - symmetry parameter csp ) similar to global closure phase using absolute value of @xmath2 modulus of @xmath3 @xmath4 small csp value less than suggests high centro - symmetry high csp values require asymmetric brightness distribution models spi data values global csp in @xmath1-band uncertainties in second column of table [ tabcspclos ] global closure phase in @xmath1 science targets red inset enlarges group points around null value global closure phase targets @xmath5 oph @xmath6 car@xmath7 pup cet ara tra hya dash - dot - dash diagonals trace relation csp = @xmath10 illustrate difference between global closure phase csp plot in fig . csplambda ] three quantities for 3 scientific targets showing global closure phase close to zeropanels left imaginary part triple product @xmath11 divided by spectral mean real part @xmath12 spectral mean equal tangent global closure phase defined eq . [ psifact ] 2 panels central column absolute value imaginary part triple product @xmath13 divided spectral mean modulus @xmath14 spectral mean equal sine global csp defined eq. [ csptrip ] 3 panels right absolute value real part triple product @xmath15 divided by spectral mean modulus @xmath14 three panels left show typical behaviours @xmath11 uniformly close to zero decreasing symmetrically around zero increasing around zero integration over spectrum produces nearly null result centro - symmetry csp allows detect deviations centro - symmetry fig . psicsp real imaginary parts triple product wavelength - independent observation spectral range show @xmath16 not no analytical relation linking two quantities derived from eqs . psifact csptrip ] integrals numerators denominators figure psicsp ] shows csp @xmath1 versus global closure phase same spectral band each science target choosing smallest uncertainty cspstars fall along diagonals @xmath17 , csp diagram relation csp = @xmath18 one ( w ori ) asymmetrical with csp not @xmath17 favour csp over @xmath17 t cet has largest values for csp and @xmath17 large deviation from centro - symmetry asymmetries wavelengths binary companion second largest csp value to r scl revealed wide binary by @xcite array millimetric wavelengths last column table [ tabcspclos shows snr csp comparable or larger than snr global closure phase spi observables _ spidast _ provides fitting routine modified gradient - expansion algorithm similar to @xcite fit applies on calibrated spi measurements visibility flux coherent flux bispectrum triple product closure phase using single - component composite parametric chromatic models fourier spectrum intensity distribution first - order partial derivatives model parameters figure shows visibility - fitting results with _ spidast _ two models ud and ld - marcs fitting routine calibrator angular diameters from marcs + turbospectrum synthetic spectra_ litpro _ software developed by jmmc working group model fitting uses elementary geometrical center - to - limb darkening functions contrary to _ spidast _ possibility to fit stellar - disk models with synthetic tabulated radiance data + turbospectrum code uncertainties of final calibrated data not distributed covariance matrix chi - fit can not used to infer parameter uncertainties compute uncertainties spidast _ uses residual - bootstrap method synthetic datasets produced from random sampling with pearson residuals difference uncertainty to initial values fitting model on new datasets produces chi - squared minima probability distribution boundaries of confidence interval parameter values associated with chi - squared boundaries give upper lower limits of parameter estimates leading to asymmetric uncertainties procedure allows computing of reliable estimates of parameter uncertainties new _ spidast _ software developed since 2006 to reduce calibrate interpret visibility triple product measurements with vlti / amber facility spidast contains modules launched separately or in automatic batch file summarisedraw data reduction by _ spidast _ computes weighted average of non - aberrant data at spectral - channel level estimates observables automated procedure method amdlib _ selects best frames quality threshold determined after trials wavelength calibration by spidast provides spectral shifts following polynomial law at channel level cross - correlation of measured spectra with synthetic spectra marcs model _ amdlib provides constant spectral shift for calibrators spidast provides routines for estimation angular diameter with indirect methods most accurate fit of stellar - atmosphere model spectra marcs on spectro - photometric data calibrator synthetic observables derived using clv functions by marcs accurate interferometric calibration spidast divides calibrator raw data with synthetic observables in each spectral channel response interpolates or fits response at each exposure on science target divides science raw data with interpolated fitted response calibrated observables for each exposure computes weighted average over each ob uncertainties computed thanks to bootstrap methodreal imaginary parts calibrated triple product spidast measures deviation centro - symmetry brightness distribution each science target observation spectral band new parameter sensitive to asymmetries global closure spidast proposes complete fitting tool parametric chromatic models flux / intensity synthetic data careful calibration data crucial for astrophysical exploitation topic of two papers parameter extraction non - linear fits model aperture - synthesis image reconstruction need reliable estimates calibrated observables robust uncertainties reduction calibration fitting routines apply to other spectral datasets including spectroscopic data spidast software public source code obtained e - mail to first author authors thank eso - paranal vlti team night astronomers a. mrand g. montagnier f patru le bouquin rengaswamy de wit vlti group coordinator s. brillant telescope instrument operators. j cortes pino herrera castex cerda cid thank programme national de physique stellaire research grateful to b. plez k. eriksson t. masseron support marcs codesupported by austrian science fund project p19503-n16 a.c post - doctoral fellow f.r- fnrs belgium grant 2.4513.11 e.p supported by prodex data partially reduced data reduction software amdlib provided jean - marie mariotti center study used simbad vizier databases cds strasbourg nasas bibliographic services bonneau 2010 danchi optical infrared interferometry ii vol 7734 spie conf building jmmc stellar diameters catalog searchcal san diego mrand bouquin 2011 origin fate sun evolution solar - mass stars high angular resolution problems amber wavelength calibration garching mnchen tallon thibaut 2008 optical infrared interferometry vol 7013 spie conf litpro model fitting software for optical interferometry marseille france pp 70131j-170131j-9 | 0.509916 | 3,223 | 1,555 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,445 | we have measured 2d autocorrelations for all charged hadrons in star with @xmath0 @xmath1 0.15 gev / c and @xmath2 @xmath3 1 from au+au collisions at 62 and 200 gev .
the correlation structure is dominated by a peak centered at zero relative opening angles on @xmath4 and @xmath5 which we hypothesize is caused by minimum - bias jets ( minijets ) .
we observe a large excess of minijet correlations in more - central au - au collisions relative to binary - collision scaling ( more correlated pairs than expected from surface emission or even volume emission ) . we also observe a sudden increase of the minijet peak amplitude and @xmath4 width relative to binary - collision scaling of scattered partons which occurs at an energy - dependent centrality point .
there is a possible scaling of the transition point with transverse particle density .
the large minijet correlations bring into question the degree of thermalization in rhic collisions . | low momentum jets are estimated to produce 50% of transverse energy in rhic heavy ion collisions and 80% at the lhc @xcite . despite the large role these _ minijets _ play ,
they have received little attention from the general community since the start of the rhic experimental program . as minijet abundance increases at higher energies
, the dynamics of minijet interactions are becoming essential to understanding heavy ion collisions .
while low momentum jets are not individually resolvable , their combined effect generates an observable correlation . in a theoretical context minijets
are typically defined within the range of applicability of pqcd by specifying a low hadron @xmath6 cutoff around 2 gev / c , even though qcd interactions continue to lower @xmath6 .
we experimentally define minijets based on correlation structure rather than an _ a priori _ @xmath6 range .
this requires a _ minimum - bias _ two - particle correlation analysis where every possible pair of particles is considered instead of selecting a few trigger / associated pairs .
minijets are distinguished from other sources by decomposing the unique correlations .
previous analyses have used this technique to reveal large minijet contributions in transverse @xcite and axial ( @xmath4 , @xmath5 ) @xcite spaces at 130 gev at four centralities . here
we report the detailed energy and centrality dependence of minijet angular correlations at rhic .
charged particle tracks detected in the star tpc with @xmath7 gev / c , @xmath8 , and full @xmath9 azimuth were analyzed from 1.2 m minbias triggered 200 gev au+au and 6.7 m 62 gev au+au events .
pair densities @xmath10 were measured as number of pairs per unit area on relative angles ( @xmath11 , @xmath12 ) for all possible unique particle pairs .
particles within the same event form _ sibling _ pair densities @xmath13 , while mixing particles from different events measures the uncorrelated _ reference _ @xmath14 .
these are formed into a normalized covariance to produce a correlation measure .
the difference @xmath15 measures the covariance in number of pairs between histogram bins , and the normalization is provided by bin - wise division of @xmath16 .
thus we use the notation @xmath17 for a _ per - particle _ correlation measure , shown in figure [ fig1 ] for selected centralities .
proton - proton collisions provide a reference for measuring the contributions to these structures .
analysis of minimum - bias correlations @xcite and single particle @xmath6 spectra @xcite show that p+p collisions are well described by a two - component soft and semi - hard scattering model , as commonly used in event generators such as pythia .
the soft component represents longitudinal fragmentation in unlike - sign pairs and produces a 1d gaussian correlation centered along @xmath18=0 .
the semi - hard component contains a same - side peak , modeled as a 2d gaussian at the @xmath19 origin , and an away - side ridge centered at @xmath20=@xmath21 . for an inclusive @xmath6 range the away - side
is completely represented by function @xmath22 that approximates a wide gaussian which narrows with increasing @xmath6 @xcite .
the final component necessary to describe p+p data is a 2d exponential at the origin containing contributions from hbt in like - sign pairs and conversion @xmath23 in unlike - sign pairs .
to ensure the simplest possible fit function for au+au collisions , we use these components from p+p collisions with only one additional @xmath24 quadrupole term to account for correlations conventionally attributed to elliptic flow @xcite . the eleven parameter fit function used for the correlation structures in figure [ fig1 ]
is then : + [ eq : fit ] f = a _ _ ( _ ) + a_2_(2 _ ) + g_s(@xmath18 : a_0 , _ 0 ) + g_h(@xmath18 , @xmath20 : a_1 , _ , _ ) + + e(@xmath18 , @xmath20 : a_2 , w _ , w _ ) + a_3 where @xmath25 and @xmath26 are the soft and hard gaussian terms and @xmath27 is an exponential function with parameters listed after the colon .
an example of this fit is shown in figure [ fig2 ] .
figure [ fig3 ] shows the measured fit parameters for the same - side peak amplitude , @xmath18 width , and volume ( @xmath28 ) .
fitting errors are shown and systematic error is estimated to be @xmath299% of the correlation amplitude and at most a few percent of the widths .
the dashed lines show the binary scaling reference expected from independent nucleon - nucleon collisions . using the kharzeev and nardi two - component model @xcite and path length @xmath30 , the minijet amplitude in au+au collisions
is expected to scale as @xmath31 $ ] from the p+p value .
peripheral collisions follow the binary scaling reference closely , deviating only by small increases in @xmath18 and decreases in @xmath20 widths .
the data show a sharp transition at approximately 55% centrality for 200 gev and 40% for 62 gev where the amplitude and @xmath18 widths increase dramatically while the @xmath20 widths continue to decrease slightly .
centrality in figure [ fig3 ] is represented by transverse particle density calculated as @xmath32 with initial collision overlap area @xmath33 from monte carlo glauber .
transverse density brings the transition points for the two energies to coincidence , whereas conventional centrality measures displace the transition points and tend to compress the peripheral data
. width , and volume fits . points
show eleven centrality bins for each energy ( 84 - 93% , 74 - 84% , 65 - 74% , 55 - 65% , 46 - 55% , 37 - 46% , 28 - 37% , 19 - 28% , 9 - 19% , 5 - 9% , and 0 - 5% ) transformed to tranvserse density . ]
the correlation structures are modified at the transition , but are still likely to be associated with minijets for several reasons .
first , these results , particularly when taken with a similar analysis of @xmath6 correlations @xcite , show that contributions from a new physical mechanism unrelated to minijets are unlikely .
any such hypothetical process must have @xmath20 widths and @xmath6 correlations that match seamlessly with minijets , which would be a remarkable coincidence .
second , the amplitude and @xmath18 width increases are consistent with further minijet interactions , which may be possible due to path - length considerations @xcite . finally , it is possible that the new correlation structures are due to changes in minijet fragmentation .
the trends in the data also suggest a lower @xmath6 manifestation of the `` ridge '' @xcite , and these results may help to discriminate among the many competing models of ridge formation .
the same - side peak volume gives the total number of correlated pairs , though finding the particle yield requires estimating the average number of correlated structures per event .
assuming each structure originates with a semi - hard parton and that semi - hard scattering follows binary scaling , we estimate that 30% of all final - state hadrons in central 200 gev au+au collisions are associated with this same - side correlation . as a source of correlated low momentum particles
, minijets provide an extremely sensitive probe of the collision system .
the binary scaling reference represents one extreme limit of a transparent medium , while the other extreme is a completely thermalized system opaque to minijets @xcite .
these results call into question the existence of the latter system at rhic energies .
wang x - n and gyulassy m 1991 _ phys . rev .
d _ * 44 * 3501 adams j ( star collaboration ) 2007 _ j. phys .
phys . _ * 34 * 799 adams j ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ phys . rev .
c _ * 73 * 064907 porter r j and trainor t a 2005 _ j. phys .
* 27 * 98 adams j ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ phys .
rev d _ * 74 * 032006 trainor t a and kettler d t 2007 _ preprint _
[ hep - ph ] kharzeev d and nardi m 2001 _ phys .
b _ * 507 * 121 adams j ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ j. phys .
g : nucl . part .
phys . _ * 32 * l37 kajantie k 1987 _ phys .
lett . _ * 59 * 2527 putschke j ( star collaboration ) 2007 _ preprint _ nucl - ex/0701074 nayak g c 2001 _ nucl .
phys . a _ * 687 * 457 ; shin g r and mller 2003 _ j. phys .
g : nucl . part .
phys . _ * 29 * 2485 | low momentum jets produce 50% transverse energy rhic heavy ion collisions 80% lhc @xcite large role little attention since rhic experimental program minijet abundance increases higher energies dynamics interactions essential heavy ion collisions not individually resolvable combined effect generates observable correlation minijets defined pqcd low hadron @xmath6 cutoff around 2 gev / c qcd interactions lower @xmath6 define minijets based correlation structure requires minimum - bias two - particle correlation analysis every minijets distinguished decomposing unique correlations previous analyses large minijet contributions in transverse @xcite axial spaces at 130 gev four centralities report detailed energy centrality dependence minijet angular correlations at rhic charged particle tracks star tpc @xmath7 @xmath9 azimuth analyzed from 1.2 m minbias triggered 200 gev au+au 6.7 m 62 gev au+au events pair densities measured pairs per unit area relative angles unique particle pairs particles event form sibling pair densities mixing particles events measures uncorrelated reference @xmath14formed normalized covariance correlation measure difference @xmath15 measures pairs between histogram bins normalization bin - wise division @xmath16 notation @xmath17 per - particle correlation measure centralities proton - proton collisions reference contributions structures minimum - bias correlations single particle @xmath6 spectra p+p collisions two - component soft semi - hard scattering model soft component longitudinal fragmentation unlike - sign pairs 1d gaussian correlation @xmath18=0 semi - hard component same - side peak 2d gaussian @xmath19 origin away - side ridge @xmath20=@xmath21 @xmath6 range away - side represented by function @xmath22 wide gaussian narrows @xmath6 final component 2d exponential at origin contributions hbt like - sign pairs conversion @xmath23 unlike - sign pairs collisions use components p+p collisions additional @xmath24 quadrupole term correlations elliptic floweleven parameter fit function correlation structures f = a + a_2_(2 ) + g_s( a_0 ) + g_h( a_1 e(_2 + a_3 @xmath25 @xmath26 soft gaussian terms @xmath27 exponential function parameters after colon example fit figure fig2 fig3 measured fit parameters same - side peak amplitude @xmath18 width volume @xmath28 ) fitting errors systematic error @xmath299% correlation amplitude few percent widths dashed lines show binary scaling nucleon - nucleon collisions kharzeev nardi two - model path length minijet amplitude au+au collisions scale @xmath31 $ from p+p value peripheral collisions follow scaling deviating small increases @xmath18 decreases @xmath20 widths transition 55% centrality 200 gev 40% 62 gev amplitude @xmath18 widths increase @xmath20 widths decrease centrality fig3 transverse particle density calculated @xmath32 initial collision overlap area @xmath33 from monte carlo glaubertransverse density transition points energies conventional centrality measures displace compress peripheral data width volume show eleven centrality bins for each energy ( 84 - 93% 74 - 84% 65 - 74% 55 - 65% 46 - 55% 37 - 46% 28 - 37% 19 - 28% 9 - 19% 5 - 9% 0 - 5% ) transformed to density correlation structures modified at transition likely associated with minijets results show contributions from new physical mechanism unrelated to minijets unlikely process must widths correlations match with minijets amplitude @xmath18 width increases consistent with minijet interactions path - length considerations new correlation structures due to changes minijet fragmentation trends suggest lower @xmath6 manifestation of ridge may discriminate models ridge formation same - side peak volume total number correlated pairs average number structures per event semi - hard parton 30% of final - state hadrons in central 200 gev collisions associated with same - side correlation source of correlated low momentum particles minijets provide sensitive probe collision systembinary scaling extreme limit transparent medium other thermalized system opaque minijets results existence latter system rhic energies wang x n gyulassy m 1991 phys . rev 44 * 3501 adams j star collaboration ) 2007 34 * 799 adams 2006 73 * 064907 porter r j trainor t a 2005 27 * 98 adams j 2006 74 * 032006 trainor t kettler d t 2007 kharzeev d nardi m 2001 phys 507 * 121 adams j star collaboration ) 2006 32 * l37 kajantie k 1987 phys 59 * 2527 putschke j star collaboration ) 2007 nucl - ex/0701074 nayak g c 2001 phys 687 * 457 shin g r mller 2003 29 * 2485 | 0.316972 | 1,997 | 1,030 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,450 | the occurrence of high temperature superconductivity , and the competition with magnetism , in stoichiometric and doped laofeas and isostructural iron - oxypnictides is raising many fundamental questions about the electronic structure and magnetic interactions in this class of materials .
there are now sufficient experimental data that it may be possible to identify the important issues whose resolution will lead to the understanding of this system . in this paper
we address a number of the important issues .
one important characteristic is the fe - as distance ( or more abstractly the pnictogen ( pn ) height @xmath0(pn ) ) ; we present results for the effect of @xmath0(pn ) on the electronic structure , energetics , and fe magnetic moment
. we also study laofeas under pressure , and investigate the effects of both electron and hole doping within the virtual crystal approximation .
the electric field gradients for all atoms in the laofeas compound are presented ( undoped and doped ) and compared with available data .
the observed @xmath1 magnetic order is studied and compared with the computationally simpler @xmath2 order which is probably a very good model in most respects .
we investigate the crucial role of the pnictogen atom in this class , and predict the structures and properties of the n and sb counterparts that have not yet been reported experimentally . at a certain volume
a gap opens at the fermi level in laofen , separating bonding from antibonding bands and suggesting directions for a better simple understanding of the seemingly intricate electronic structure of this system .
finally , we address briefly on the possible effects of post - lanthanum rare earths , which have been observed to enhance the superconducting critical temperature substantially . | isostructural and isovalent laofep and laofeas are layered conductors , the first being superconducting at t@xmath3=2.5 k@xcite while the second becomes antiferromagnetically ordered at t@xmath4 @xmath5 140 k@xcite and is not superconducting .
the discovery of superconductivity at 26 k in carrier - doped laofeas@xcite , followed by rapid improvement now up to t@xmath3=55 k@xcite in this class , makes these superconductors second only to the cuprates in critical temperature .
several dozen preprints appeared within the two months after the original publication , and many hundred since , making this the most active field of new materials study in recent years ( since the discovery in mgb@xmath6 , at least ) . a host of models and ideas about the `` new physics '' that must be operating in this class of compounds is appearing , pointing out the need to establish a clear underpinning of the basic electronic ( and magnetic ) structure of the system .
the materials are strongly layered , quasi - two - dimensional in their electronic structure , by consensus .
the electronic structure of laofep was described by lebgue,@xcite with the electronic structure and its neighboring magnetic instabilities of laofeas being provided by singh and du@xcite .
several illuminating papers have appeared since , outlining various aspects of the electronic and magnetic structure of laofeas .
the extant electronic structure work has provided a great deal of necessary information , but still leaves many questions unanswered , and indeed some important questions are unaddressed so far . in this paper
we address some of these questions more specifically .
stoichiometric laofeas is afm ; then @xmath70.05 carriers / fe doping of either sign destroys magnetic order and impressive superconductivity arises , with @xmath8 seemingly depending little on the carrier concentration . another question is : with the nonmagnetic electronic structure of laofep and laofeas being so similar , why is the former superconducting while the latter is ( antiferro)magnetic ? surely this difference must be understood and built into bare - bones models , or else such models risk explaining nothing , or explaining anything .
another question is the effect of the structure .
unusual sensitivity to the as height @xmath0(as ) has been noted@xcite ; t@xmath3 is reported to increase with applied pressure@xcite ( reduction in volume ) for low values of doping ( up to @xmath9 in lao@xmath10f@xmath11feas , which is reported as the amount of f for optimal doping ) ; there are increases in t@xmath3 due to replacement of la with other rare earth ions , and the variation in size of the rare earth is often a dominant factor in the observed trends in their compounds . very important also is the magnetism in these materials , as magnetism is a central feature in the cuprate superconductors and in correlated electron superconductors .
another important question is : what can be expected if other pnictide atoms can be incorporated into this system : sb ( or even bi ) on the large atom side , or n on the small atom end . in this paper
we address these questions .
the members of the family of the new fe - based superconductors crystallize in the zrcusias type structure@xcite ( space group p4/nmm , z = 2 ) .
for instance , laofeas is made of alternating lao and feas layers , as presented in fig .
[ fig : structure ] . ,
scaledwidth=48.0% ] the fe and o atoms lie in planes , while the as and la atoms are distributed on each side of these planes following a chessboard pattern .
the crystal structure is fully described by the a and c lattice parameters , together with the internal coordinates of la and as .
experimentally , @xmath12 and @xmath13 , while z(la ) = 0.14154 and z(as ) = 0.6512 . magnetic structure of the fe - as substructure of laofeas , showing alternating chains of fe spin up ( red circles with black dots ) and fe spin down ( blue circles with black crosses ) .
the as atoms above ( below ) the fe plane are represented as large ( small ) squares .
the @xmath14 cell is represented in full lines , while the @xmath15 cell is in dashed lines .
[ fig : afm ] , scaledwidth=28.0% ] however to describe correctly the antiferromagnetic structure , a @xmath14 cell must be used , with four fe atoms per cell , as shown in full lines in fig .
[ fig : afm ]
. we will refer to this antiferromagnetic order as the q@xmath16 afm order , or equivalently as ( @xmath17 ) , while the q@xmath18 afm order corresponds to an antiferromagnetic order of the original cell ( dashed lines in fig .
[ fig : afm ] ) with two fe atoms .
also , fm will refer to a ferromagnetic arrangement of the spins , while nm means non - magnetic .
to calculate the relevant quantities , we have used density functional theory ( dft ) @xcite , as implemented in three different electronic structure codes .
the full potential local orbital ( fplo ) code@xcite was mainly used , while we double checked some of the calculations with wien2k code @xcite . for most of the fplo and lapw calculations ,
the perdew and wang 1992 ( pw92)@xcite exchange - correlation ( xc ) functional was used , but the effect of xc functional was checked using also lsda(pz)@xcite , the pbe ( perdew _ et al . _ 1996)@xcite , and another gga ( perdew _ et al . _
1992)@xcite xc functionals . at each constant volume ,
the crystal structure was fully relaxed , i.e. , @xmath19 , @xmath0(la ) and @xmath0(pn ) were relaxed , where pn is the pnictogen atom .
the errors were estimated to be within 0.5@xmath20 for c / a , and 1.0@xmath20 for z(la ) and z(pn ) .
the relaxation was performed in the q@xmath16 afm structure , with 132 irreducible k points in the bz .
we double checked the total energy with a finer mesh with 320 irreducible k points in the bz , and the difference is very small .
after relaxation , all calculations were performed using dense meshes , with 320 , 1027 , and 637 irreducible k points in the bz of the q@xmath16 afm , q@xmath18 afm and nm structure , respectively . in the q@xmath16 afm structure , we used 464 irreducible k points in the bz to double check the result , without any noticeable difference in the dos nor band structure . as for the results presented in sect .
[ sect - pipipi ] , we used the paw ( projector augmented waves ) method @xcite as implemented in the code vasp ( vienna ab - initio simulation package)@xcite .
the perdew burke ernzerhof@xcite variant of the generalized gradient approximation ( gga ) was used for the exchange - correlation potential . a cut - off of @xmath21 ev
was used for the plane - wave expansion of the wave function to converge the relevant quantities .
for brillouin zone integrations , a mesh of @xmath22 @xmath23-points@xcite was used within the modified tetrahedron method@xcite .
this mesh was decreased to @xmath24 for the cell doubled along the @xmath25 axis .
laofeas has a tetragonal structure ( as described in sect . [
sec : two ] ) at room temperature@xcite .
although it undergoes a structural phase transition at lower temperature@xcite ( see section [ sect - pipipi ] ) , the doped ( and superconducting ) material lao@xmath10f@xmath11feas remains in this structure down to low temperature , so the study of laofeas in the high symmetry structure is a necessary step towards the understanding of the electronic structure of the whole family of compounds .
first , we studied the electronic structure of laofeas in the experimental ( tetragonal ) crystal structure for different magnetic states ( q@xmath16 afm , q@xmath18 afm , fm and nm ) using two different codes ( fplo@xmath26 and wien@xmath27k ) and different exchange - correlation functionals .
this is necessary in view of the large number of theoretical papers@xcite which appeared recently and often contain strong disagreements .
this was partly studied by mazin
_ et al._.@xcite table [ as - mag - xc ] summarizes the results : the magnetic moment on the fe atom together with the total energy differences for each magnetic state studied here .
independent of the code or the xc functional used , the q@xmath16 afm state is always found to be the ground state , which confirms our earlier report@xcite .
the magnetic moment for both afm orders are considerably larger than the ordered moment reported from neutron diffraction and muon spin relaxation experiments , while the one for the fm order is much smaller .
for this last case , fplo7 gives zero which indicates no magnetism with both pz and pw92 xc functional ; wien2k gives about 0.36 @xmath28@xmath29 with gga and pbe and 0.13 @xmath28@xmath29 with pw92 .
it appears therefore that the magnetic moment of fe for the same state with different xc functionals varies by up to 0.5 @xmath28@xmath29 , which is unexpectedly large , although gga is known to enhance magnetism.@xcite the difference between fplo7 and wien2k in predicting the fe magnetic moment for each state may explain the total energy differences among them .
virtual doping ( see subsection b ) by 0.1 e@xmath30/fe enhances the fe magnetic moment in the q@xmath16 afm state but reduces it in the fm state for all the xc functionals used . in the structural optimization ( performed in the q@xmath16 state ) , fplo7 with pw92 ( lda ) functional gives reasonable c / a and z(la ) in good agreement with experiment , but it predicted z(as ) @xmath7 0.139 , which is 0.011 off the experimental value , about 0.1 in length .
however , wien2k with pbe(gga ) xc functional gives an optimized z(as ) @xmath7 0.149 , which agrees well with experimental z(as ) .
similar results are found in the xfe@xmath6as@xmath6 family ( x = ba , sr , ca ) too .
it suggests that , gga ( pbe ) xc functional optimizes the feas - based system much better than lda ( pw92 ) xc functional . and gga should have better performance in dealing with the structure ( including c / a , equilibrium volume and z(as ) ) under pressure of this feas family
this is probably due to the layered structure of the feas family which results in large density gradient between layers , thus gga has better description of the potential .
but in the meantime , gga ( pbe ) further overestimates the magnetic moment of fe , which is already overestimated by lda ( pw92 ) .
.calculated magnetic moment of fe , the amounts of total energy per fe lie below nonmagnetic state of fm , q@xmath18 afm and q@xmath16 afm states from fplo7 and wien2k with different xc functionals of laofeas with experimental structure .
positive @xmath31 ee means lower total energy than nm state . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
we have investigated in some detail the electronic structure and magnetic properties of the laofeas class of novel superconductors using ab - initio methods .
the effects of the fe - as distance , of doping , and of pressure , as well as calculations of the efgs have been reported .
it was found that ( approximate ) electron - hole symmetry versus doping , and strong magnetophonon coupling are primary characteristics of the laofeas system , and are two of the ingredients that need to be understood to proceed toward the discovery the mechanism of superconducting pairing .
we studied effects of the structural distortion and of the ( @xmath32 ) magnetic order , finding that experiments can be reproduced fairly well by our calculations .
finally , the related materials laofep , laofesb , and laofen were investigated and their properties compared to those of laofeas . from these comparisons , it appears that laofep is significantly different from the other materials studied here ; this difference might explain why , at stoichiometry , laofep is superconducting while laofeas is antiferromagnetic .
also , in view of their similarities with laofeas , either pure or doped laofesb and laofen are potential candidates as superconductors .
we acknowledge financial support from anr pnano grant n@xmath33 anr-06-nano-053 - 02 and n@xmath33 anr - blan07 - 1 - 186138 ( s.l . ) and from doe grant de - fg03 - 01er45876 ( w.e.p . ) .
w.e.p . is happy to acknowledge a grant from the france berkeley fund that enabled the initiation of this project . | isovalent laofep laofeas layered conductors first superconducting at t@xmath3=2.5 k@xcite second antiferromagnetically ordered at t@xmath4 @xmath5 140 k@xcite not superconducting discovery superconductivity at 26 k in carrier - doped laofeas@xcite improvement to t@xmath3=55 k@xcite makes superconductors second to cuprates in critical temperature dozen preprints appeared two months after publication hundred since active field new materials study discovery mgb@xmath6 models ideas about new physics compounds need establish underpinning basic electronic magnetic structure materials strongly layered quasi - two - dimensional electronic structure structure laofep described by lebgue,@xcite magnetic instabilities laofeas by singh du@xcite illuminating papers appeared outlining electronic magnetic structure laofeas electronic structure work information leaves questions unanswered important questions paper stoichiometric laofeas is afm @xmath70.05 carriers fe doping destroys magnetic order superconductivity arises @xmath8 on carrier concentrationquestion nonmagnetic electronic structure of laofep laofeas similar why former superconducting latter antiferro)magnetic ? difference understood built into models risk explaining effect of structure sensitivity to as height @xmath0(as ) noted@xcite t@xmath3 with pressure for low values doping up to @xmath9 lao@xmath10f@xmath11feas optimal doping increases in t@xmath3 due to replacement la with rare earth ions variation in size rare earth dominant factor in trends compounds important magnetism materials central feature in cuprate superconductors correlated electron superconductors question if other pnictide atoms incorporated system sb bi large atom side n small atom end questions new fe - based superconductors crystallize in zrcusias type structure@xcite space group z = 2 ) laofeas alternating lao feas layers in fig . fe o atoms in planes as la atoms distributed on each side planes chessboard pattern crystal structure described by a c lattice parameters internal coordinates of la and as @xmath12 @xmath13 z(la ) = 0.14154 z(as ) = 0.6512 magnetic structure fe - substructure laofeas alternating chains fe spin up red circles black dots fe spin down blue circles black crosses atoms above fe plane represented large squares @xmath14 cell full lines @xmath15 cell dashed lines fig : afm scaledwidth=28.0% antiferromagnetic structure @xmath14 cell used four fe atoms per cell full lines fig . antiferromagnetic order q@xmath16 afm order @xmath17 ) q@xmath18 afm order antiferromagnetic order original cell dashed lines two fe atoms fm ferromagnetic arrangement spins nm non - magnetic calculate quantities used density functional theory dft ) @xcite three electronic structure codes full potential local orbital fplo ) code@xcite used double checked calculations wien2k code @xcite fplo lapw calculations perdew wang 1992@xcite exchange - correlation ( xc ) functional used effect xc functional checked using lsda(pz)@xcite pbe@xcite gga)@xcite xc functionals constant volume crystal structure fully relaxed@xmath19(la(pn ) relaxed pn pnictogen atom errors within 0.5@xmath20 for c / a 1.0@xmath20 for z(la ) z(pn ) relaxation in q@xmath16 afm structure 132 irreducible k points bz double checked energy with finer mesh 320 k points difference small after relaxation calculations using dense meshes 320 1027 637 irreducible k points q@xmath16 afm q@xmath18 afm nm structure q@xmath16 afm structure used 464 irreducible k points bz double check noticeable difference in dos band structure results sect . used paw method @xcite perdew burke ernzerhof@xcite variant gradient for exchange - correlation potential cut - off of @xmath21 ev for plane - wave expansion for brillouin zone integrations mesh of @xmath22 @xmath23-points@xcite used modified tetrahedron method mesh decreased to @xmath24 cell doubled along @xmath25 axis laofeas has tetragonal structure at room temperaturestructural phase transition at lower temperature doped superconducting material lao@xmath10f@xmath11feas remains low temperature study laofeas in high symmetry structure understanding electronic structure family compounds studied electronic structure laofeas in experimental crystal structure for different magnetic states q@xmath16 q@xmath18 afm using codes fplo@xmath26 wien@xmath27k exchange - correlation functionals necessary theoretical papers disagreements partly studied by mazin et al. table summarizes results magnetic moment on fe atom total energy differences for each magnetic state independent code q@xmath16 afm state ground state confirms report magnetic moment for afm orders larger than from neutron diffraction muon spin relaxation experiments fm order smaller fplo7 gives zero no magnetism with pz pw92 xc functional wien2k gives 0.36 @xmath28@xmath29 with gga pbe 0.13 with pw92 magnetic moment of fe same state with different xc functionals varies by up to 0.5 unexpectedly large gga magnetism difference between fplo7 and wien2k fe magnetic moment may explain total energy differencesdoping 0.1@xmath30/fe enhances fe magnetic moment q@xmath16 afm reduces fm xc functionals structural optimization q@xmath16 fplo7 with pw92 lda functional reasonable c / a z(la ) experiment predicted z(as ) @xmath7 0.139 0.011 off experimental value 0.1 wien2k pbe(gga ) xc functional optimized z(as ) @xmath7 0.149 agrees experimental z(as ) similar results xfe@xmath6as@xmath6 family gga ( pbe ) xc functional optimizes feas - system better than lda pw92 ) xc functional gga better performance structure c / a volume z(as pressure feas family layered structure large density gradient layers gga better description potential gga overestimates magnetic moment fe overestimated by lda ( pw92 fe total energy fe below nonmagnetic state fm q@xmath18 afm q@xmath16 afm states fplo7 wien2k xc functionals positive @xmath31 ee lower total energy than nm statecols="^,^,^",options="header " investigated electronic structure magnetic properties laofeas class novel superconductors using ab - initio methods effects of fe - as distance doping pressure calculations efgs reported found electron - hole symmetry versus doping strong magnetophonon coupling primary characteristics laofeas system mechanism superconducting pairing studied effects structural distortion @xmath32 ) magnetic order experiments reproduced well by calculations related materials laofep laofesb laofen investigated properties compared to laofeas laofep significantly different difference explain laofep superconducting laofeas antiferromagnetic pure or doped laofesb laofen potential candidates as superconductors acknowledge financial support from anr pnano grant n@xmath33 anr-06-nano-053 - 02 anr - blan07 - 1 - 186138 doe grant de - fg03 - 01er45876 ( w.e.p. grant from france berkeley fund initiation project | 0.437663 | 2,980 | 1,588 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,465 | a truncated bfkl series is studied and applied to hadronic processes . the @xmath0
are described with good agreement with data and in a way consistent with the unitarity bound .
the elastic scattering amplitude is calculated at @xmath1 , introducing two distinct anstze for the proton impact factor .
the @xmath2 is obtained at small @xmath3 approximation and compared with the data . | the understanding of the bfkl pomeron has been demanding a considerable theoretical effort . its behavior in perturbative qcd
is determined by generating the integral equation @xcite .
that procedure consists of summing the leading logarithms on energy , @xmath4 , order by order from perturbation theory and the main result is that the @xmath5 for the @xmath6-exchange process is a power of @xmath7 . a priori
, bfkl is itself asymptotic and we may ask if at finite energies , i.e. non asymptotic regime , summing a finite number of terms from the bfkl series could describe the existent data . for
that we should use a truncated bfkl series , performing a finite sum of gluon ladders ( bearing in mind reggeized gluons and considering effective vertices ) .
the question that remains is how many orders should one take into account .
the lowest order two gluons exchange calculation leads to a @xmath5 constant on @xmath7 and the next contribution to the sum is the one rung gluon ladder , which provides a logarithmic growth . in order to avoid unitarity violation and
by simplicity we truncate our summation at this order . as a result a successfull fit to the @xmath0 with these two contributions is obtained and presented in sec .
2 . these results motivate to check the non - forward amplitude in order to obtain the prediction for the @xmath2 , which gives the behavior on the momentum transfer @xmath3 . in the bfkl framework
such analysis is dependent of the proton impact factor ( if ) input , which introduces certain uncertainty due to the presence of non - perturbative content .
the ifs determine the coupling of the pomeron to the color singlet hadrons and play a crucial role in the calculation of the non - forward amplitude .
we calculate the @xmath8 elastic amplitude at @xmath1 taking into account two distict anstze to the proton if : the dirac form factor , as proposed recently by balitsky and kuchina @xcite and the usual non - perturbative ansatz @xcite .
the main resulting features are discussed in sec . 3 , although considering that a more realistic ansatz to the proton if is still to be found .
in addition the @xmath2 is calculated in the small @xmath3 approximation and compared with the experimental data . in the last section we present our conclusions .
in the leading logarithm approximation ( lla ) , the pomeron is obtained considering the color singlet ladder diagrams whose vertical lines are reggeized gluons coupled to the rungs through the effective vertices .
the correspondent amplitude is purely imaginary and the coupling constant @xmath9 is considered frozen in some transverse momentum scale @xcite . for the elastic scattering of a hadron , the mellin transform of the scattering amplitude is given by @xcite : @xmath10 where the @xmath11 is the color factor for the color singlet exchange , @xmath12 and @xmath13 are the transverse momenta of the exchanged gluons in the @xmath3-channel and @xmath14 is the momentum transfer , with @xmath15 .
the function @xmath16 is the mellin transform of the bfkl kernel @xmath17 , which states the dynamics of the process and is obtained in perturbative qcd .
the main properties of the lo kernel are well known @xcite and the results arising from the nlo calculations have yielded intense debate in the literature recently @xcite . in the case of @xmath18(@xmath19 ) scattering , the factor @xmath20 is the proton if , which in the absence of a perturbative scale has a non - perturbative feature and furnishes the @xmath6-proton coupling .
this factor turns the amplitude infrared safe when the colliding particles are colorless . in the leading order of perturbation theory we have @xmath21 and in the next order @xmath22 \ , .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is the color number and @xmath9 is the strong coupling constant . in order to perform a reliable calculation the convenient proton if should be introduced .
this is not an easy task , namely these hadronic processes are soft and there is no hard scale allowing to use perturbation theory .
in fact , we should know in details the parton wavefunction in the hadron to calculate the ifs properly . since this is not available ,
several models are proposed in order to calculate them . from the optical theorem ,
the lowest order contribution to the @xmath5 is a constant term , and the next order term is a logarithm of the energy , scaled by a typical gluon transverse momentum of the process ( arbitrary ) .
when considering @xmath25 there is no need to deal with both a specific form for the if and the transverse momentum integration .
this allows to consider @xmath7-independent factors in each term as free parameters and to obtain them from data .
the correct description at low energy requires the reggeon contribution , which is parameterized from regge theory .
our expression to the total cross section is then , @xmath26 hence we fix the constants @xmath27 and @xmath28 from data on @xmath19 , imposing the same contribution for both @xmath18 and @xmath19 .
this procedure is reasonable due to the higher energies reached on @xmath19 collision , where the pomeron dominates . on the other hand ,
@xmath18 data are predominantly at low energy , which is not strongly sensitive to the pomeron model , thus dominated by the reggeonic contribution .
a successful description of data is obtained for the whole range of energy .
the result is shown in the fig .
the parameters and a more detailed discussion can be found in ref .
@xcite .
the hypothesis of considering two orders from the bfkl series ( @xmath29 ) is phenomenologically corroborated by the well known dispersion relation fit @xcite .
an important additional advantage is that the total cross section obtained is consistent with the unitarity constraint , avoiding unitarization procedures . as a final remark , at the lhc energy ( @xmath30 tev ) the extrapolation of our results
will give @xmath31 .
in order to calculate the elastic amplitude at @xmath1 , information about the coupling between the proton and the @xmath3-channel reggeized gluons in the ladder is required .
namely , introducing a reliable proton if that has to be modeled since it can not be calculated from first principles due to the unknowledge on the wavefunction of the hadronic constituent partons . here
are analized two distinct models for the if : balitsky and kuchina proposed recently @xcite that at large momentum transfer the coupling of the bfkl pomeron to the nucleon is essentially equal to the dirac form factor of the nucleon .
their basic idea is that in the lowest order in perturbation theory there is no difference between the diagrams for the nucleon if and similar diagrams with two gluons replaced by two photons , in such a way that the amplitudes can be calculated without any model assumption .
this if , @xmath32 , is decoupled in the transverse momentum integration and presents an explicit dependence on @xmath3 , being similar to the usual pomeron - proton coupling used in regge phenomenology .
the expression is @xmath33 the choice for this proton if is useful when one analyzes near forward observables , for instance the elastic differential cross section .
however it does not play the role of a regulator of infrared divergences at @xmath8 process because clearly it does not vanish when the gluon transverse momenta goes to zero . in electron - proton process
the situation is different since the photon impact factor supplies that condition @xcite .
then the next step is to perform the gluon transverse momenta integrations .
in fact , such integrals are infrared divergent and should be regularized .
an usual way out is to introduce an infrared cut - off @xmath34 , temporally defining a small gluon mass , avoiding problems at the infrared region .
this procedure is quite similar as to take into account a non - perturbative massive gluon propagator ( see i.e. ref .
@xcite ) . the lowest order ( order @xmath35 )
contribution , using eqs .
( 1 - 2 ) , gives the following result : @xmath36 ^ 2 \frac{\pi}{(|t|-\lambda^2)}\,\ln \left(\frac{\lambda^2}{|t|}\right ) \ , .
\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] the one rung gluon ladder has two components ( order @xmath37 ) , given by the following expression : @xmath38 ^ 2 \,s\ , \ln\left(\frac{s}{{\bf k^2}}\right)\,(i_1 + i_2)\ , , \nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath39 corresponding to the one rung gluon ladder and @xmath40 correspondent to the three gluons exchange graphs , whose order is also @xmath41 .
such structure is due to the fact that in the color singlet calculation there is no cancellation between graphs and one can not obtain an expression for the two - loop level which is proportional to the one loop amplitude @xcite .
we define @xmath40 through symmetry on the integration variables @xmath12 and @xmath13 ( see eqs .
( 1,3 ) ) and the factor @xmath42 collects the correspondent color factors and the remaining constants .
the explicit calculation of those integrals , yields @xmath43 @xmath44 some comments about the amplitude above are in order .
the scale of the factor @xmath34 should be at non - perturbative regime , i.e. @xmath45 gev@xmath46 . an interesting aspect is the behavior of the amplitude at the forward limit @xmath25 , where it becames very large .
this limit is a well known property of perturbative qcd calculations and there are several reasons to believe that the point @xmath25 plays a very special role , such that perturbation theory may even not be applicable . for the full bfkl series in the forward region there is still the diffusion on tranverse momenta , i.e. on @xmath47 , which extends into both the ultraviolet and the infrared regions @xcite .
nevertheless , the momentum scale @xmath3 supplies the control condition .
however , we will suppose that a smooth transition from a finite @xmath3 down to @xmath25 is possible and that the finite bfkl series gives the correct behavior on energy for the forward observables .
later we make use of this hypothesis to obtain the logarithmic slope @xmath48 and the differential elastic cross section . using quite general properties of the ifs ,
namely they vanish as transverse momenta go to zero , one can guess their behavior which is determined by the large scale nucleon dynamics .
regardless its exact shape , in general the proton if takes the form @xcite : @xmath49 where @xmath50 is a scale which is typical of the non - perturbative dynamics . as a consequence of this choice
the momentum transfer behavior is completely determined by the kernel .
the amplitude now reads : @xmath51 \nonumber \\ + \ , a^{\prime}\,\ln\left(\frac{s}{{\bf k}^2}\right)\,\left [ \frac{\ln ( \mu^2)}{(|t|- \mu^2 ) } + \frac{\ln(\mu^2)|t|}{(|t|-\mu^2)^2}\ln \left(\frac{\mu^2}{|t|}\right)\right ] \,.\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] here we use the definition @xmath52 .
we observe again a divergent behavior at @xmath25 , nevertheless we claim that the forward amplitude is finite in this point and the dependence on energy is correctly described . despite obtaining an analytic expression to the elastic scattering amplitude ,
a direct comparison with the experimental data is known not to be reliable .
in fact , data on differential cross section at low @xmath3 are parameterized in the form @xmath53 , where @xmath54 is the forward slope @xcite . therefore
, we can obtain an expression for the differential cross section at small @xmath3 , using our previous results .
the usual relation to describe the cross section is : @xmath55_{t=0}\ , .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the regge framework the slope is obtained from the powerlike behavior of the scattering amplitude , dependent of the effective slope of the pomeron trajectory @xmath56 , namely @xmath57 .
the parameter @xmath58 comes from the slope of the @xmath59-@xmath59-@xmath6 vertex . in our case
we should obtain the slope from the non forward elastic scattering amplitudes @xmath60 obtained above . for the amplitude obtained employing the balitsky and kuchina impact factor it results the following slope @xmath61 where the first term does not contribute effectively at @xmath25 and we are left only with the second term . from simple inspection of the amplitude obtained with the usual impact factor ( see eq . ( 5 ) )
we also verify that one gets a similar expression to the correspondent slope . considering the specific form for the @xmath3-derivative of the amplitudes , their asymptotic values at @xmath25 depend only on the energy .
in fact , they take the form @xmath62 , where @xmath63 and @xmath64 are @xmath7-independent parameters . for our case , the amplitude is purely imaginary , then @xmath65 and @xmath66 .
putting all together , the corresponding slope is @xmath67\,\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the elastic differential cross section is given by eq .
( 6 ) , where again @xmath68 . in order to obtain the parameters @xmath63 and @xmath64
, we use the slope experimental values for both low ( cern - isr ) and high energy ( cern - sps , tevatron ) points from @xmath19 reaction ( @xmath69gev@xmath70 gev ) @xcite . having the slope obtained from data ,
the elastic differential cross section is straighforwardly determined and a successful comparison with its experimental measurements at @xmath71 gev is shown in the fig .
( 2 ) . in summary
, we study the contribution of a truncated bfkl series to the hadronic process , specifically the @xmath8 collisions , considering two orders in perturbation theory corresponding to the bare two gluons exchange and the one rung gluon ladder . despite the restrictions imposed by the use of a perturbative approach for soft observables , a good description of the total cross sections
was obtained motivating an analysis of the elastic differential cross section .
although the qcd perturbation theory is in principle not reliable at the forward direction ( @xmath25 ) , nevertheless we suppose that perturbation theory gives the behavior on energy even in this region . the next step is to consider @xmath3 different from zero , where the momentum transfer furnishes a scale to perform suitable calculations . in order to proceed this
, we calculate the non forward amplitude introducing two distinct anstze for the proton impact factor , namely a factorizable @xmath3-dependent proposed recently by balitsky and kuchina and the usual non - perturbative impact factor . in order to describe data we used a small momentum transfer approximation and obtained an expression to the elastic slope @xmath72 and the correspondent parameters .
the elastic differential cross section is obtained straightforwardly , describing with good agreement the experimental data at both low and high energy values .
mbdg thanks the organizers of this lively meeting and the useful discussions with p. landshoff , a. kaidalov , e. levin , v. petrov and m. ryskin
. 9 e.a .
kuraev , l.n .
lipatov and v.s .
fadin , _ phys . lett _ * b60 * ( 1975 ) 50 ; _ sov
* 44 * ( 1976 ) 443 ; _ sov .
* 45 * ( 1977 ) 199 ; ya .
balitsky and l.n .
lipatov , _ sov .
_ * 28 * ( 1978 ) 822 . | understanding bfkl pomeron theoretical effort behavior in perturbative qcd determined by generating integral equation @xcite procedure summing logarithms on energy @xmath4 perturbation theory @xmath5 for @xmath6-exchange process power of @xmath7 bfkl asymptotic if finite energies summing finite terms from bfkl series describe data use truncated bfkl series finite sum gluon ladders how many orders lowest order two gluons exchange calculation leads to @xmath5 constant on @xmath7 next contribution one rung gluon ladder provides logarithmic growth avoid unitarity violation truncate summation order successfull fit to @xmath0 with two contributions obtained presented in sec . 2 results motivate to check non - forward amplitude prediction for @xmath2 behavior on momentum transfer @xmath3 bfkl framework analysis dependent of proton impact factor input uncertainty non - perturbative content ifs determine coupling pomeron to color singlet hadrons calculation non - forward amplitudecalculate @xmath8 elastic amplitude @xmath1 two anstze proton if dirac form factor proposed balitsky kuchina non - perturbative ansatz features discussed sec. 3 realistic ansatz proton found @xmath2 calculated @xmath3 approximation compared with experimental data last section present conclusions leading logarithm approximation pomeron obtained color singlet ladder diagrams vertical lines gluons coupled rungs amplitude imaginary coupling constant @xmath9 frozen transverse momentum scale @xcite elastic scattering hadron mellin transform scattering amplitude given by @xcite @xmath10 @xmath11 color factor singlet exchange @xmath12 @xmath13 transverse momenta exchanged gluons @xmath3-channel @xmath14 momentum transfer @xmath15 function @xmath16 mellin transform bfkl kernel @xmath17 dynamics process obtained perturbative qcd main properties lo kernel known results nlo calculations debate @xmath18(@xmath19 ) scattering factor @xmath20 proton if non - perturbative feature furnishes @xmath6-proton coupling factor turns amplitude infrared safe when colliding particles colorlessleading order perturbation theory @xmath21 next @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 color number @xmath9 strong coupling constant reliable calculation convenient proton if introduced not easy task hadronic processes soft no hard scale perturbation theory know parton wavefunction hadron calculate ifs not available several models proposed calculate optical theorem lowest order contribution @xmath5 constant term next order term logarithm energy scaled typical gluon transverse momentum process considering @xmath25 no need specific form if transverse momentum integration consider @xmath7-independent factors each term free parameters obtain from data correct description low energy requires reggeon contribution parameterized from regge theory expression total cross section @xmath26 fix constants @xmath27 @xmath28 from data @xmath19 same contribution @xmath18 @xmath19 procedure reasonable higher energies @xmath19 collision pomeron dominates @xmath18 data predominantly low energy not sensitive to pomeron model dominated by reggeonic contribution successful description data whole range energy result shown in fig . parameters detailed discussion in ref . @xcite .hypothesis two orders from bfkl series ( @xmath29 ) corroborated by dispersion relation fit @xcite total cross section consistent with unitarity constraint avoiding unitarization procedures at lhc energy ( @xmath30 tev extrapolation results @xmath31 calculate elastic amplitude at @xmath1 information coupling between proton @xmath3-channel gluons ladder required reliable proton if unknowledge wavefunction hadronic partons analized two models for balitsky kuchina proposed large momentum transfer coupling bfkl pomeron to nucleon equal to dirac form factor nucleon no difference between diagrams nucleon if diagrams with two gluons replaced by two photons amplitudes calculated without model assumption if @xmath32 decoupled in transverse momentum integration dependence on @xmath3 similar to pomeron - proton coupling expression @xmath33 choice proton if useful analyzes observables elastic differential cross section regulator of infrared divergences at @xmath8 process vanish when gluon transverse momenta to zero in electron - proton process different photon impact factor supplies condition next step perform gluon transverse momenta integrationsintegrals infrared divergent regularized introduce infrared cut - off @xmath34 defining small gluon mass avoiding problems infrared region procedure similar non - perturbative massive gluon propagator @xcite lowest order @xmath35 ) contribution eqs 1 - 2 gives result : @xmath36 ^ 2 \frac{\pi}-\lambda^2)} one rung gluon ladder has two components order @xmath37 ) expression @xmath38 ^ 2 \left(^2}}(i_1 + i_2) @xmath39 one rung gluon ladder @xmath40 three gluons exchange graphs order @xmath41 structure due color singlet calculation no cancellation between graphs expression two - loop level proportional to one loop amplitude define @xmath40 through symmetry on integration variables @xmath12 @xmath13 factor @xmath42 collects correspondent color factors remaining constants explicit calculation integrals yields @xmath43 @xmath44 comments amplitude scale of factor @xmath34 non - perturbative regime@xmath45 gev@xmath46 interesting aspect behavior amplitude at forward limit @xmath25 large limit known property of perturbative qcd calculations reasons believe point @xmath25 special role perturbation theory may not be applicable full bfkl series forward region diffusion on tranverse momenta @xmath47 extends into ultraviolet and infrared regions momentum scale @xmath3 supplies control condition smooth transition from finite @xmath3 to @xmath25 possible finite bfkl series gives correct behavior on energy for forward observables hypothesis to obtain logarithmic slope @xmath48 differential elastic cross section general properties ifs vanish as transverse momenta to zero behavior determined by large scale nucleon dynamics proton if takes form @xcite : @xmath49 @xmath50 scale typical of non - perturbative dynamics momentum transfer behavior determined by kernel amplitude reads : @xmath51 \nonumber}\left(\frac{s}{{}^2}\right)\frac{\ln\mu^2)}{|-\mu^2\rightuse definition @xmath52 divergent behavior at @xmath25 claim forward amplitude finite dependence on energy described analytic expression elastic scattering amplitude direct comparison with experimental data not reliable data differential cross section at low @xmath3 parameterized @xmath53 @xmath54 forward slope @xcite obtain expression for differential cross section at small @xmath3 previous results usual relation cross section @xmath55_{t=0} regge framework slope obtained from powerlike behavior scattering amplitude dependent of effective slope pomeron trajectory @xmath56 @xmath57 parameter @xmath58 from slope @xmath59--@xmath6 vertex obtain slope from non forward elastic scattering amplitudes @xmath60 amplitude balitsky and kuchina impact factor results slope @xmath61 first term contribute at @xmath25 left with second term inspection amplitude usual impact factor similar expression to correspondent slope @xmath3-derivative amplitudes asymptotic values at @xmath25 depend on energy take form @xmath62 @xmath63 and @xmath64 @xmath7-independent parameters amplitude imaginary @xmath65 and @xmath66 corresponding slope is @xmath67{aligned elastic differential cross section by eq . ( 6 ) @xmath68 obtain parameters @xmath63 and @xmath64 slope experimental values for low and high energy points from @xmath19 reaction @xmath69gev@xmath70 gev @xcite slope obtained from data elastic differential cross section determined comparison with measurements at @xmath71 gev in fig . ( 2 ) study contribution truncated bfkl series to hadronic process @xmath8 collisions two orders in perturbation theory two gluons exchange one rung gluon ladder perturbative approach for good description of total cross sections analysis elastic differential cross section qcd perturbation theory not reliable at forward direction ( @xmath25 ) behavior on energy consider @xmath3 different from zero momentum transfer scale calculations calculate non forward amplitude two anstze for proton impact factor factorizable @xmath3-dependent non - perturbative impact factor used small momentum transfer approximation expression to elastic slope @xmath72 correspondent parameters elastic differential cross section obtained experimental data at low and high energy valuesmbdg thanks organizers lively meeting discussions. landshoff kaidalov levin petrov ryskin kuraev l lipatov v fadin phys . lett b60 * 1975 ) 50 ; sov 44 * 1976 ) 443 45 1977 ) 199 balitsky l sov 28 * 1978 ) 822 | 0.56737 | 3,583 | 1,837 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,468 | energy resolution , @xmath0 ratio , and the pulse shape discrimination ability of the znwo@xmath1 crystal scintillators were studied .
the radioactive contamination of a znwo@xmath1 crystal was investigated in the solotvina underground laboratory .
possibilities to apply znwo@xmath1 crystals for the dark matter and double beta decay searches are discussed .
new improved half - life limits on double beta decay in zinc isotopes were established , in particular , for @xmath2 decay of @xmath3zn as : @xmath4 yr and @xmath5 yr , both at 68% cl
. -0.5 cm -0.5 cm 0.2 cm f.a .
danevich , v.v .
kobychev , s.s .
nagorny , d.v .
poda , v.i .
tretyak , s.s .
yurchenko , yu.g .
zdesenko _ institute for nuclear research , msp 03680 kiev , ukraine
_ 0.4 cm 0.4 cm pacs numbers : 29.40.mc ; 23.40.-s ; 95.35.+d 0.4 cm keywords : znwo@xmath1 crystal scintillators ; double beta decay ; dark matter 1.0 cm | observation of the neutrinoless ( 0@xmath6 ) double beta ( @xmath7 ) decay and/or dark matter particles would be extraordinary events for the modern physics .
it is because both the phenomena are related to the new physical effects beyond the standard model of the particle theory .
the great interest to the @xmath8 decay searches @xcite have arisen from the recent evidence of neutrino oscillations , strongly suggesting that neutrinos have nonzero mass .
while oscillation experiments are sensitive to the neutrinos mass difference , only the measured @xmath8 decay rate could establish the majorana nature of the neutrino and give the absolute scale of the effective neutrino mass .
several sensitivity studies of the @xmath7 decay processes were performed using low background crystal scintillators , which contain various candidate nuclei : @xmath9ca @xcite , @xmath10ca @xcite , @xmath11cd @xcite , @xmath12cd , @xmath13cd and @xmath14cd @xcite , @xmath15ce and @xmath16ce @xcite , @xmath17gd @xcite , @xmath18w and @xmath19w @xcite .
for instance , in the experiment @xcite with the cadmium tungstate ( cdwo@xmath1 ) scintillators enriched in @xmath14cd the very low counting rate of 0.04 counts/(yr@xmath20kev@xmath20 kg ) was reached in the energy window @xmath21 mev .
the half - life limit on @xmath8 decay of @xmath14cd was set as @xmath22 yr at 90% cl , which leads to one of the strongest restriction on the effective majorana neutrino mass @xmath23 ev .
there are strong evidence for a large amount of dark matter in the universe ( matter which reveals itself only through gravitational interaction ) . weakly interacting massive particles ( wimp ) in particular neutralino , predicted by the minimal supersymmetric extensions of the standard model
are considered as one of the most acceptable component of the dark matter @xcite .
these particles can be detected due to their scattering on nuclei producing low energy nuclear recoils .
extremely low counting rate and small energy of recoil nuclei are expected in experiments to search for the wimp .
therefore , the experiments for direct wimp search require extremely low level of background ( less than several events per kilogram per day per kev ) with very low energy threshold ( less than tens kev ) . direct methods of wimp detection are based on registration of ionization or / and excitation of recoil nucleus in the material of the detector itself . at present , most sensitive experiments apply different detectors for wimp search : ge semiconductor detectors @xcite , bolometers @xcite , scintillation detectors @xcite . an interesting possibility to reject background caused by electrons provides cryogenic technique , which uses simultaneous registration of heat and charge @xcite or heat and light signals @xcite . in ref .
@xcite calcium tungstate crystals ( cawo@xmath1 ) are discussed as promising material for such a kind of dark matter detector . however , radioactive contamination of cawo@xmath1 crystals used in @xcite , as well as investigated in @xcite , is too high for low counting measurements .
the purpose of our work was investigation of scintillation properties and radioactive contamination of zinc tungstate ( znwo@xmath1 ) crystals as possible detectors for the double beta decay and dark matter experiments .
three clear , slightly colored znwo@xmath1 crystals ( @xmath24 mm , @xmath25 mm , and @xmath26 mm ) were used in our studies .
the crystals were fabricated from monocrystals grown by the czochralski method .
the main properties of znwo@xmath1 scintillators are presented in table 1 , where characteristics of calcium and cadmium tungstates are given for comparison .
cdwo@xmath1 + density ( g/@xmath27 ) & 7.8 & 6.1 & 8.0 + melting point ( @xmath28c ) & 1200 & @xmath29 & 1325 + structural type & wolframite & sheelite & wolframite + cleavage plane & marked ( 010 ) & weak ( 101 ) & marked ( 010 ) + hardness ( mohs ) & @xmath30 & @xmath31 & @xmath30 + wavelength of emission maximum ( nm ) & 480 & @xmath32 & 480 + refractive index & @xmath33 & 1.94 & @xmath34 + effective average decay time@xmath35 ( @xmath36s ) & 24 & 8 & 13 + photoelectron yield [ % of nai(tl)]@xmath35 & 13% & 18% & 20% + + scintillation characteristics of zinc tungstate crystals have been studied in @xcite .
light yield of znwo@xmath1 was measured in @xcite with the help of silicon photodiodes as 9300 photons / mev ( which is @xmath37% of nai(tl ) light yield ) .
we have estimated the value of the photoelectron yield of the znwo@xmath1 in measurements with two scintillators : znwo@xmath1 @xmath25 mm and standard nai(tl ) @xmath38 mm .
the crystals were coupled to the pmt ( emi d724kflb ) with the bialkali rbcs photocathode .
the znwo@xmath1 detector was wrapped by ptfe reflector tape .
the relative photoelectron yield of znwo@xmath1 was determined as 13% of that of nai(tl ) .
the energy resolution of znwo@xmath1 crystals for 662 kev @xmath39 rays ( @xmath40cs ) has been reported as fwhm@xmath41 @xcite and fwhm@xmath42 @xcite . in the present work the energy resolution fwhm@xmath43 for 662 kev @xmath39 line of @xmath40cs was measured with the znwo@xmath1 @xmath25 mm crystal .
the crystal was wrapped by ptfe reflector tape and optically coupled to 3 " photomultiplier ( pmt ) philips xp2412 .
taking into account slow decay of znwo@xmath1 scintillation , the 24 @xmath36s shaping time of spectroscopy amplifier was set .
a substantial improvement of light collection ( @xmath44% ) and energy resolution was achieved by placing the crystal in liquid ( silicone oil with index of refraction @xmath45 ) .
the crystal was fixed in center of the teflon container @xmath46 mm and viewed by two pmts xp2412 .
1(a ) demonstrates the energy spectra of @xmath40cs and @xmath47co obtained in such a way with the @xmath487 mm znwo@xmath1 scintillation crystal . for the first time
the energy resolution 9.1% and 6% was measured with znwo@xmath1 crystal scintillator for 662 and 1333 kev @xmath39 lines , respectively .
furthermore , the resolution 11.3% for the 662 kev @xmath39 line was obtained with the larger crystal @xmath4928 mm in the same measurement conditions .
1(b ) shows the energy spectra of @xmath50am and @xmath51fe low energy gamma and x - ray lines measured with the znwo@xmath1 scintillator @xmath52 mm ( the crystal was wrapped by ptfe reflector tape and optically coupled to the pmt xp2412 ) .
the 6 kev peak of @xmath51fe source is still resolved from the pmt noise .
the @xmath53 ratio ratio is defined as ratio of @xmath54 peak position in the energy scale measured with @xmath55 sources to the energy of @xmath54 particles . because @xmath39 quanta interact with detector by @xmath56 particles , we use more convenient term
@xmath53 ratio .
] was measured ( in the energy range of @xmath57 mev ) with the help of the collimated beam of @xmath58 particles from an @xmath50am source and using various sets of thin mylar films as absorbers .
the energies of @xmath58 particles were determined with the help of a surface - barrier detector ( see for details @xcite ) .
the znwo@xmath59 crystal was irradiated in the directions perpendicular to ( 010 ) , ( 001 ) , and ( 100 ) crystal planes .
the dependence of the @xmath60 ratio on energy and direction of @xmath58 beam relatively to the crystal planes ( see fig .
2 ) is similar to that observed with cdwo@xmath1 scintillators @xcite .
as the quenching of the scintillation light caused by @xmath58 particles ( in comparison with electrons ) is due to the higher ionization density of @xmath58 particles , such a behaviour of the @xmath60 ratio can be explained by the energy dependence of ionization density of @xmath58 particles @xcite .
the time characteristics of znwo@xmath1 scintillators were studied as described in @xcite with the help of a transient digitizer based on the 12 bit adc ( ad9022 ) operated at the sample rate of 20 ms / s .
the scintillator was irradiated by @xmath61 mev @xmath58 particles in the direction perpendicular to the ( 010 ) crystal plane .
shapes of the light pulses produced by @xmath58 particles and @xmath39 rays are depicted in fig .
fit of the pulses by the function : @xmath62 , where @xmath63 are intensities ( in percentage of the total pulse intensity ) , @xmath64 are decay constants for different light emission components , @xmath65 is integration constant of electronics ( @xmath66s ) , gives three decay components @xmath67 , @xmath68 and @xmath69 @xmath36s with different amplitudes for @xmath39 rays and @xmath58 particles ( see table 2 ) .
the value of the slow decay component is in agreement with the result of 25 @xmath36s obtained in @xcite , while 0.7 and 7 @xmath36s decay time constants were identified at the first time .
we were not able to measure the 0.1 @xmath36s decay component reported in @xcite , because of the not enough fast digitizer used in our measurements .
.decay times of znwo@xmath1 scintillators for @xmath39 quanta and @xmath58 particles .
the decay constants and their intensities ( in percentage of the total intensity ) are denoted as @xmath70 and a@xmath71 , respectively . [ cols= "
< , < , < , < , < " , ] in addition , the observed with znwo@xmath1 scintillators dependence of pulse shape on the direction of @xmath58 particles irradiation relative to the crystal axes ( supposing that such a dependence would remain valid for nuclear recoils ) could be used to detect a diurnal asymmetry of wimp direction @xcite .
scintillation properties of znwo@xmath1 crystals were studied . the energy resolution 9.1% ( 662 kev @xmath40cs @xmath39 line )
was obtained with znwo@xmath1 crystal scintillator placed in liquid and viewed by two pmts .
shapes of scintillation signals was investigated , and clear pulse - shape discrimination for @xmath39(@xmath56 ) and @xmath58 events was achieved .
dependences of the @xmath0 ratio and scintillation pulse shape on the energy of alpha particles were measured .
it was also found that the @xmath0 ratio and pulse shape show the dependence on direction of @xmath58 irradiation relatively to the main crystal planes of znwo@xmath1 crystal .
radioactive contamination of znwo@xmath1 crystal was measured in the solotvina underground laboratory .
no radioactive pollution in znwo@xmath1 scintillator was observed .
limits on radioactive contamination in znwo@xmath1 crystal are on the level from tenth to a few mbk / kg which is one two order of magnitude lower than those for cawo@xmath1 . two potentially @xmath7 active zinc and two tungsten isotopes ( @xmath3zn , @xmath72zn , @xmath18w , and @xmath19w ) were studied with the help of znwo@xmath1 crystal .
new improved half - life limits on double beta decay in zinc isotopes were established . in particular , for the @xmath73 decay of @xmath3zn the half - life limit was set as @xmath74 yr at 68% cl . due to a low level of radioactive contamination ,
znwo@xmath1 crystals seems to be encouraging material for the dark matter experiments .
znwo@xmath1 crystals could provide a possibility to search for spin - dependent inelastic scattering of wimp with excitation of low energy nuclear levels .
most interesting targets are @xmath75zn and @xmath76w . a strong signature can be used to search for spin - dependent inelastic scattering of wimp on nuclei with nonzero spin ( which are present in znwo@xmath1 crystals ) , via registration of nuclear recoils and delayed @xmath39 quanta . due to dependence of znwo@xmath1 scintillation pulse shape on direction of irradiation by high ionizing particles
, there is @xmath77 a possibility to search for diurnal modulation of wimp direction .
it could be a strong signature for wimp evidence . c. bacci et al .
, astropart .
phys . 2 ( 1994 ) 13 ; r. bernabei et al .
b 389 ( 1996 ) 757 ; 424 ( 1998 ) 195 ; 450 ( 1999 ) 448 ; 480 ( 2000 ) 23 ; 509 ( 2001 ) 197 ; eur .
j. c 23 ( 2002 ) 61 ; riv .
26 ( 2003 ) 1 . | neutrinoless double beta @xmath7 ) decay dark matter particles extraordinary events for modern physics related to new physical effects beyond standard model particle theory interest to @xmath8 decay searches from recent evidence neutrino oscillations suggesting neutrinos nonzero mass oscillation experiments sensitive to neutrinos mass difference measured @xmath8 decay rate establish majorana nature neutrino absolute scale effective neutrino mass studies @xmath7 decay processes performed using low background crystal scintillators candidate nuclei @xmath9ca experiment with cadmium tungstate scintillators @xmath14cd low counting rate 0.04 counts/(yr kg ) reached in energy window @xmath21 mev half - life limit on @xmath8 decay of @xmath14cd set as @xmath22 yr at 90% cl restriction on effective majorana neutrino mass @xmath23 ev evidence for large amount dark matter in universe through gravitational interactioninteracting massive particles ( wimp ) neutralino acceptable dark matter @xcite particles detected due scattering on nuclei producing low energy nuclear recoils low counting rate small energy recoil nuclei expected in experiments wimp experiments wimp search require low level background less than events per kilogram per day kev low energy threshold less than tens kev ) wimp detection registration ionization excitation recoil nucleus in material detector experiments apply detectors for wimp search semiconductor detectors bolometers scintillation detectors possibility reject background electrons cryogenic technique simultaneous registration heat charge calcium tungstate crystals ( ) promising material for dark matter detector radioactive contamination of crystals too high for low counting measurements purpose work scintillation properties radioactive contamination of zinc tungstate ( znwo@xmath1 ) crystals as detectors for double beta decay dark matter experiments three clear slightly colored znwo@xmath1 crystals ( used fabricated from monocrystals grown czochralski methodproperties znwo@xmath1 scintillators table 1 characteristics calcium cadmium tungstates cdwo@xmath1 density@xmath27 ) 7.8 6.1 8.0 melting point @xmath28c 1200 @xmath29 1325 structural type wolframite sheelite cleavage plane 010 101 ) hardness mohs ) @xmath30 wavelength emission maximum nm 480 @xmath32 refractive index @xmath33 1.94 @xmath34 average decay time@xmath35 ) 24 8 13 photoelectron yield % nai(tl) 13% 18% 20% scintillation characteristics zinc tungstate crystals studied @xcite light yield znwo@xmath1 measured 9300 photons / mev @xmath37% of nai(tl ) light yield estimated photoelectron yield znwo@xmath1 two scintillators mm mm crystals coupled pmt d724kflb bialkali rbcs photocathode znwo@xmath1 detector wrapped ptfe reflector tape relative photoelectron yield 13% nai(tl )energy resolution znwo@xmath1 crystals 662 kev @xmath39 rays reported@xmath41 resolution@xmath43 662 kev @xmath39 line measured znwo@xmath1 @xmath25 mm crystal wrapped reflector tape coupled 3 " photomultiplier philips xp2412 slow decay 24 @xmath36s shaping time spectroscopy amplifier set improvement light collection energy resolution crystal liquid silicone oil refraction @xmath45 crystal fixed teflon container @xmath46 mm viewed two pmts xp2412 energy spectra @xmath40cs @xmath47co @xmath487 mm znwo@xmath1 scintillation crystal energy resolution 9.1% 6% measured@xmath1 662 1333 kev @xmath39 lines resolution 11.3% 662 kev @xmath39 line larger crystal @xmath4928 mm energy spectra @xmath50am @xmath51fe low energy gamma x - ray lines measured znwo@xmath1 scintillator @xmath52 mm wrapped tape coupled pmt xp2412 6 kev peak @xmath51fe source resolved from pmt noise@xmath53 ratio @xmath54 peak position @xmath55 sources @xmath54 particles @xmath39 quanta with @xmath56 particles @xmath53 ratio measured energy @xmath57 mev with collimated beam @xmath58 particles from @xmath50am source thin mylar films absorbers energies @xmath58 particles determined surface - barrier detector znwo@xmath59 crystal irradiated perpendicular to ( 010 ) 001 ) ( 100 ) crystal planes dependence @xmath60 ratio on energy direction @xmath58 beam similar cdwo@xmath1 scintillators @xcite quenching scintillation light @xmath58 particles due to higher ionization density @xmath58 @xmath60 ratio energy dependence ionization density particles time characteristics of znwo@xmath1 scintillators studied transient digitizer 12 bit adc sample rate 20 ms / s scintillator irradiated by @xmath61 mev @xmath58 particles perpendicular to ( 010 ) crystal plane light pulses @xmath58 particles @xmath39 rays depicted in fig .pulses function @xmath62 intensities percentage total pulse intensity decay constants light emission components integration constant electronics three decay components @xmath67 different amplitudes @xmath39 rays @xmath58 particles table 2 slow decay component result 25 @xmath36s @xcite 0.7 7 @xmath36s decay time constants identified first time measure 0.1 @xmath36s decay component @xcite not enough fast digitizer.decay times znwo@xmath1 scintillators @xmath39 quanta @xmath58 particles decay constants intensities percentage total intensity denoted @xmath70@xmath71 observed znwo@xmath1 scintillators dependence pulse shape on direction @xmath58 particles irradiation crystal axes detect diurnal asymmetry wimp direction @xcite scintillation properties znwo@xmath1 crystals studied energy resolution 9.1% ( 662 kev @xmath40cs @xmath39 line obtained znwo@xmath1 crystal scintillator liquid two pmts shapes scintillation signals investigated clear pulse - shape discrimination for @xmath39 @xmath58 events achieved@xmath0 ratio scintillation pulse shape on energy alpha particles measured show dependence direction @xmath58 irradiation crystal planes znwo@xmath1 crystal radioactive contamination measured solotvina underground laboratory no radioactive pollution in scintillator observed limits contamination tenth to mbk / kg lower than cawo@xmath1 two potentially @xmath7 active zinc tungsten isotopes @xmath3zn studied znwo@xmath1 crystal improved half - life limits double beta decay in zinc isotopes established @xmath73 decay @xmath3zn limit set @xmath74 yr at 68% cl low radioactive contamination znwo@xmath1 crystals dark matter experiments search spin - dependent inelastic scattering low energy nuclear levels targets @xmath75zn @xmath76w strong signature search for spin - dependent inelastic scattering on nuclei nonzero spin znwo@xmath1 crystals registration nuclear recoils delayed @xmath39 quanta dependence znwo@xmath1 scintillation direction irradiation high ionizing particles @xmath77 search diurnal modulation wimp direction signature wimp evidence bacci astropart phys . 2 1994 ) 13 bernabei 389 1996 757 424 1998 195 450 1999 448 480 2000 23 509 2001 197 j 23 2002 61 riv 26 2003 ) 1 | 0.511351 | 3,142 | 1,641 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,482 | the results of the abundance analyses of six stars are presented . for three stars ,
the impact of individual odfs and various treatments of convection in the calculactions of the model atmospheres are investigated . | as has been discussed in the course of this workshop , the classification of stars is not as simple and straightforward as for other groups of chemically peculiar stars .
when only low resolution classification spectra are used , it is likely that stars with different astrophysical properties but similar characteristics in the narrow spectral range are included .
therefore a detailed spectroscopic investigation for a large number of confirmed stars ( e.g. paunzen et al .
1997 ) covering the whole range of atmospheric parameters is required to establish a common abundance pattern for these stars .
up to now we have analyzed the chemical composition of six stars where two of them turned out to be spectroscopic binaries ( paunzen et al .
1998 ) . in order to put our results on more solid
ground we investigated the impact of using different programmes for the calculation of the model atmospheres on the abundances of three stars with different temperatures , gravities and metallicities ( heiter et al .
the two issues we examined concerned the inclusion of individual line opacities and the calculation of the convective flux in the model atmospheres .
high resolution spectra with high signal - to - noise ratios have been obtained at various sites as listed in table [ obs_tab ] .
they have been reduced with noao iraf ( willmarth & barnes 1994 ) , and atmospheric parameters and abundances have been derived as described by gelbmann et al .
( 1997 , 1998 ) .
the resulting atmospheric parameters are presented in table [ par_tab ] .
the abundances of each element for which at least one `` unblended '' line could be detected in the observed spectra of the programme stars are plotted in figs .
[ abu_fig1 ] and [ abu_fig2 ] .
`` unblended '' means that no other line with a depth greater than 30 % of that of the examined line is found within a wavelength window whose width depends mainly on the @xmath0 of the respective star .
.observations used for this analysis . [ cols="<,<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ]
the abundances of the three stars from fig .
[ abu_fig1 ] were used to calculate individual opacity distribution functions ( odfs ) for these stars with a programme written by n. piskunov ( piskunov & kupka 1998 ) .
the subsequent inclusion of these odfs in the model atmosphere calculations instead of the tabulated opacities from kurucz ( 1993 ) showed that the @xmath1-relations and therefore the synthetic spectra of all three stars do not change significantly . in the next step we compared the results of the original atlas9 programme ( kurucz 1993 , mlt ) with three versions where the treatment of convection ( or overshooting ) had been changed : 1 ) deletion of the part of the programme concerning the overshooting ( no ) , 2 ) implementation of the convection model by canuto & mazzitelli ( 1991 , cm ) , 3 ) variation of the treatment of overshooting ( castelli 1996 , ovok ) .
the differences can be summarized as follows : using the no version results in similar changes compared to mlt as for the cm model , whereas ovok yields practically the same @xmath1-relation as mlt . for hd84123
, the largest differences occur in the visible spectral range ( see fig .
[ con_fig1 ] ) , where the abundances of all elements would have to be decreased by 0.1 dex to match the mlt calculations . for hd192640 ,
significant differences are only seen in the uv spectral range ( fig .
[ con_fig2 ] ) .
the cm flux seems to represent the observations better than that of mlt .
note the absorption feature at 1600 , which can not be reproduced by either of the models .
for the hottest of the stars , hd183324 , the differences are negligible . this investigation was carried out within the working group _ asteroseismology ams _ with funding from the fonds zur frderung der wissenschaft - lichen forschung ( project _ s7303-ast _ ) .
we thank dr .
e. solano for providing the iue spectra .
use was made of the simbad database , operated at cds , strasbourg , france .
castelli , f. : 1996 , in _ model atmospheres and spectrum synthesis _ , eds . : s.j
. adelman , f. kupka and w.w .
weiss , asp conf .
108 , p. 85
gelbmann , m. : 1998 , _ this workshop _
kurucz , r.l . : 1993 , _ cd - rom 1 - 23 _ , smithsonian astrophysical observatory willmarth , d. , barnes , j. : 1994 , _ a user s guide to reducing echelle spectra with iraf _ | discussed workshop classification of stars not simple low resolution classification spectra used likely stars with different properties similar characteristics in narrow spectral range included detailed spectroscopic investigation for large confirmed stars paunzen et 1997 ) atmospheric parameters required establish common abundance pattern analyzed chemical composition of six stars two spectroscopic binaries 1998 investigated impact of different programmes for on abundances of three stars with different temperatures gravities metallicities issues examined inclusion of individual line opacities calculation convective flux in model atmospheres high resolution spectra high signal - to - noise ratios obtained at various sites table reduced with noao iraf atmospheric parameters abundances derived by gelbmann et al . 1997 1998 resulting atmospheric parameters presented in table [ par_tab ] abundances of each element for one `` unblended '' line detected spectra plotted in figs_fig2 unblended '' means no other line with depth greater than 30 % of examined line within wavelength window width depends on @xmath0 respective star.observations used for analysiscols="<",options="header " abundances of three stars from fig used to calculate opacity distribution functions with programme by n piskunov inclusion odfs in model atmosphere calculations opacities kurucz 1993 showed @xmath1-relations synthetic spectra of three stars change significantly compared results original atlas9 programme with three versions where treatment of convection overshooting changed deletion implementation convection model by canuto & mazzitelli variation of treatment overshooting castelli 1996 differences summarized no version results in similar changes to mlt ovok yields same @xmath1-relation as mlt for hd84123 largest differences in visible spectral range fig abundances decreased by 0.1 dex to match mlt calculations for hd192640 significant differences only in uv spectral range fig_fig2 cm flux observations better than mlt absorption feature at 1600 not reproduced by models for hottest stars hd183324 differences negligible investigation carried out within working group _ asteroseismology ams _ with funding from fonds zur frderung der wissenschaft - lichen forschung project s7303thank dr solano iue spectra use simbad database cds strasbourg france castelli 1996 model atmospheres spectrum synthesis eds s adelman kupka w weiss asp conf . 108 p. 85 gelbmann 1998 workshop kurucz 1993 cd - rom 1 - 23 astrophysical observatory willmarth barnes 1994 user s guide reducing echelle spectra iraf | 0.192113 | 1,059 | 515 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,491 | the supersymmetry invariant integrable structure of two - dimensional superconformal field theory is considered .
the classical limit of the corresponding infinite family of integrals of motion ( i m ) coincide with the family of i m of susy n=1 kdv hierarchy .
the quantum version of the monodromy matrix , generating quantum i m , associated with the susy n=1 kdv is constructed via vertex operator representation of the quantum r - matrix .
the possible applications to the perturbed superconformal models are discussed .
superconformal field theory , super - kdv , quantum superalgebras 11.25.hf ; 11.30.pb ; 02.20.uw ; 02.20.tw | it is known that the superconformal field theory possesses two integrable structures @xcite . in the previous paper @xcite
we have considered the quantum super - kdv @xcite-@xcite hierarchy , which give rise to the infinite number of commuting integrals of motion ( i m ) , constructed via the generators of the superconformal algebra and therefore leading to one of these integrable structures .
but this set of i m is not invariant under the supersymmetry transformation .
+ here we consider the susy n=1 kdv hierarchy @xcite , @xcite which is a supersymmetric generalization of the kdv one , in the case of this model the supersymmetry generator is included in the commuting family of i m @xcite .
the outline of the paper is as follows . in the first part ( sec .
2 ) we consider the classical theory of susy n=1 kdv system , based on the twisted affine superalgebra @xmath0 .
we introduce the supersymmetric miura transformation and monodromy matrix associated with the corresponding l - operator
. then the auxiliary @xmath1-matrices are constructed , which satisfy the quadratic poisson bracket relation . as we will show in sec .
4 quantum counterparts of these matrices coincide with a vertex - operator - represented quantum r - matrix . the quantum version of the miura transformation i.e. the free field representation of the superconformal algebra is given in sec . 3 . in sec .
4 the quantum @xmath2 superalgebra @xcite is introduced .
then it is shown that the corresponding quantum r - matrix can be represented by two vertex operators , satisfying serre relations of lower borel subalgebra of @xmath2 and in the classical limit it coincides with @xmath1-matrix .
the vertex - operator - represented quantum r - matrix @xmath3 satisfies the so - called rtt - relation , which give us possibility to consider the model from a point of view of quantum inverse scattering method ( qism ) @xcite , @xcite .
this could be well applied ( sec.5 ) to the study integrable perturbed superconformal theories with supersymmetry unbroken , arising in the physics of 2d disordered systems , lattice models ( e.g. the tricritical ising model ) , and in the superstring physics ( e.g. supersymmetric d - branes ) @xcite-@xcite .
the susy n=1 kdv system can be constructed by means of the drinfeld - sokolov reduction applied to the @xmath4 twisted affine superalgebra @xcite .
the corresponding @xmath5-operator has the following form : @xmath6 where @xmath7 is a superderivative , the variable @xmath8 lies on a cylinder of circumference @xmath9 , @xmath10 is a grassmann variable , @xmath11 is a bosonic superfield ; @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 are the chevalley generators of c(2 ) with the following commutation relations : @xmath16=0,\quad [ h_1,{e_2}^{\pm}]=\pm{e_2}^{\pm } , \quad [ h_2,{e_1}^{\pm}]=\pm{e_1}^{\pm},\\ & & ad^{2}_{{e_1}^{\pm}}{e_2}^{\pm}=0 , \quad ad^{2}_{{e_2}^{\pm}}{e_1}^{\pm}=0 , \nonumber\\ & & [ h_{\alpha},{e_{\alpha}}^{\pm}]=0 \quad(\alpha = 1,2),\quad [ { e_{\beta}}^{\pm},{e_{\beta'}}^{\mp}]=\delta_{\beta , \beta'}h_{\beta}\quad ( \beta , \beta ' = 1,2),\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the supercommutator [ , ] is defined as follows : @xmath17\equiv ad_{a } b\equiv ab- ( -1)^{p(a)p(b)}ba$ ] , where parity @xmath18 is equal to 1 for odd elements and is equal to 0 for even ones . in the particular case of c(2 ) @xmath19 are even and @xmath20 are odd .
the operator ( 1 ) can be considered as more general one , taken in the evaluation representation of @xmath4 : @xmath21 where @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 are the chevalley generators of @xmath4 with such commutation relations : @xmath25=0,\quad [ h_{\alpha_0},e_{\pm\alpha_1}]= \mp e_{\pm\alpha_1},\quad [ h_{\alpha_1},e_{\pm\alpha_0}]= \mp e_{\pm\alpha_0},\\ & & [ h_{\alpha_i},e_{\pm\alpha_i}]=\pm e_{\pm\alpha_i},\quad [ e_{\pm\alpha_i } , e_{\mp\alpha_j}]=\delta_{i , j}h_{\alpha_i},\quad ( i , j=0,1 ) , \nonumber\\ & & ad^{3}_{e_{\pm\alpha_0 } } e_{\pm\alpha_1}=0 , \quad ad^{3}_{e_{\pm\alpha_1 } } e_{\pm\alpha_0}=0\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 , @xmath29 .
the poisson brackets for the field @xmath30 , obtained by means of the drinfeld - sokolov reduction are : @xmath31 and the following boundary conditions are imposed on the components of @xmath30 : @xmath32 , @xmath33 . the @xmath34-operator is written in the miura form , making a gauge transformation one can obtain a new superfield @xmath35 , where @xmath36 and @xmath37 generate the superconformal algebra under the poisson brackets : @xmath38 using one of the corresponding infinite family of i m , which are in involution under the poisson brackets ( these i m could be extracted from the monodromy matrix of @xmath39-operator , see below)@xcite : @xmath40 one can obtain an evolution equation ; for example , taking @xmath41 we get the susy n=1 kdv equation @xcite : @xmath42 and in components : @xmath43 , @xmath44 as we have noted in the introduction one can show that the i m are invariant under supersymmetry transformation generated by @xmath45 .
+ in order to construct the so - called monodromy matrix we introduce the @xmath39-operator , equivalent to the @xmath34 one : @xmath46 the equivalence can be easily established if one considers the linear problem associated with the @xmath34-operator : @xmath47 ( we consider this operator acting in some representation of @xmath4 and @xmath48 is the vector in this representation ) .
then , expressing @xmath49 in components : @xmath49=@xmath50 , we find : @xmath51 and @xmath52 .
+ the solution to the equation @xmath51 can be written in the following way : @xmath53 \big)\eta,\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath54 is a constant vector in the corresponding representation of @xmath4 .
therefore we can define the monodromy matrix in the following way : @xmath55 \big).\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] introducing then ( as in @xcite ) the auxiliary @xmath1-operators : @xmath56 we find that in the evaluation representation ( when @xmath57 , the spectral parameter appears ) the following poisson bracket relation is satisfied @xcite : @xmath58,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath59 is trigonometric @xmath4 r - matrix @xcite . from this relation one
obtains that the supertraces of monodromy matrices @xmath60 commute under the poisson bracket : @xmath61 . expanding @xmath62 in @xmath57 in the evaluation representation corresponding to the defining 3-dimensional representation of @xmath63 @xmath64
we find : @xmath65 where @xmath66 .
so , one can obtain the i m from the supertrace of the monodromy matrix . using the poisson bracket relation for these supertraces with different values of spectral parameter
( see above ) we find that infinite family of i m is involutive , as it was mentioned earlier .
in this section we begin to build quantum counterparts of the introduced classical objects
. we will start from the quantum miura transformation , the free field representation of the superconformal algebra @xcite : @xmath67 where @xmath68=\frac{i}{2}\beta^2 , \quad [ a_n , a_m]=\frac{\beta^2}{2}n\delta_{n+m,0},\qquad \{\xi_n,\xi_m\}=\beta^2\delta_{n+m,0}.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] recall that there are two types of boundary conditions on @xmath69 : @xmath33 .
the sign `` + '' corresponds to the r sector , the case when @xmath69 is integer modded , the `` '' sign corresponds to the ns sector and @xmath69 is half - integer modded .
the variable @xmath70 in ( 13 ) is equal to zero in the r case and equal to 1 in the ns case .
+ one can expand @xmath71 and @xmath72 by modes in such a way : @xmath73 , @xmath74 , where @xmath75 and @xmath76 generate the superconformal algebra : @xmath77&=&(n - m)l_{n+m}+\frac{\hat{c}}{8}(n^3-n)\delta_{n ,- m } , \quad \lbrack l_n , g_m\rbrack=(\frac{n}{2}-m)g_{m+n}\nonumber\\ \lbrack g_n , g_m\rbrack&=&2l_{n+m}+\delta_{n ,- m}\frac{\hat{c}}{2}(n^2 - 1/4).\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the classical limit @xmath78 ( the same is @xmath79 ) the following substitution : @xmath80 , @xmath81 , @xmath82\to \frac{4\pi}{i\hat{c}}\{,\ } $ ] reduce the above algebra to the poisson bracket algebra of susy n=1 kdv theory .
+ let now @xmath83 be the highest weight module over the oscillator algebra of @xmath84 , @xmath85 with the highest weight vector ( ground state ) @xmath86 determined by the eigenvalue of @xmath87 and nilpotency condition of the action of the positive modes : @xmath88 where @xmath89 . in the case of the r sector
the highest weight becomes doubly degenerate due to the presence of zero mode @xmath90 .
so , there are two ground states @xmath91 and @xmath92 : @xmath93 . using the above free field representation of the superconformal algebra
one can obtain that for generic @xmath94 and @xmath18 , @xmath83 is isomorphic to the super - virasoro module with the highest weight vector @xmath86 : @xmath95 where @xmath96 in the ns sector and module with two highest weight vectors in the ramond case : @xmath97 the space @xmath83 , now considered as super - virasoro module , splits into the sum of finite - dimensional subspaces , determined by the value of @xmath98 : @xmath99 , @xmath100 .
the quantum versions of local integrals of motion should act invariantly on the subspaces @xmath101 .
thus , the diagonalization of i m reduces ( in a given subspace @xmath102 ) to the finite purely algebraic problem , which however rapidly become rather complicated for large @xmath103 .
it should be noted also that in the case of the ramond sector supersymmetry generator @xmath104 commute with i m , so i m act in @xmath91 and @xmath92 independently , without mixing of these two ground states ( unlike the super - kdv case @xcite ) .
the obtained rtt - relation ( 21 ) and corresponding quantum integrability condition give us possibility to consider the model possessing the associated i m from a point of view of qism @xcite , @xcite . in our case
the class of such systems is very wide .
it contains all the superconformal ( minimal ) models and some of their perturbations ( though in the unperturbed case scft usually provides easier methods ) .
the perturbations that do not break the integrability ( commuting with i m ) and therefore appropriate for the qism scheme are ( following the arguments of @xcite,@xcite ) @xmath197 and @xmath198 operators , corresponding to the vertex operators @xmath199 .
the topic of special interest is the scft with perturbation on the boundary related to the d - brane theory @xcite , @xcite .
+ in order to find the eigenvalues of the transfer matrices ( they are our main object of study , because their expansion in @xmath57 gives the quantum i m ) one can follow two routes . the first one , introduced in @xcite , is based on the so - called `` fusion relations '' @xcite for the transfer matrices .
in the case when @xmath200 is a root of unity ( @xmath201 and @xmath202 are rational ) , the system of fusion relations becomes finite and reduces to the thermodynamic bethe ansatz equations @xcite .
+ another approach is the baxter q - operator method , which could be applied for all values of @xmath201 ( therefore for all values of the central charge)@xcite .
the construction of the q - operator and fusion relations will be given in the paper under preparation @xcite .
we are grateful to f.a .
smirnov for useful discussions .
the work was supported by the dynasty foundation ( amz ) and rfbr grant 03 - 01 - 00593 ( ppk ) . | superconformal field theory two integrable structures @xcite previous paper considered quantum super - kdv @xcite-@xcite hierarchy infinite commuting integrals motion constructed via generators superconformal algebra leading to integrable not invariant under supersymmetry transformation consider susy n=1 kdv hierarchy @xcite supersymmetric generalization of kdv one supersymmetry generator included in commuting family i m @xcite outline paper first part classical theory of susy n=1 kdv system twisted affine superalgebra @xmath0 supersymmetric miura transformation monodromy matrix l - operator auxiliary @xmath1-matrices constructed satisfy quadratic poisson bracket relation quantum counterparts coincide with vertex - operator - represented quantum r - matrix quantum version miura transformation algebra sec . 3 4 quantum @xmath2 superalgebra introduced quantum r - matrix represented by two vertex operators satisfying serre relations lower borel subalgebra coincides with @xmath1-matrix vertex - operator - represented quantum r - matrix @xmath3 satisfies rtt - relation model quantum inverse scattering method @xciteapplied sec.5 study superconformal theories supersymmetry unbroken physics 2d disordered systems lattice models tricritical ising model superstring physics supersymmetric d - branes susy n=1 kdv system constructed drinfeld - sokolov reduction @xmath4 twisted superalgebra@xmath5-operator form @xmath6 superderivative variable @xmath8 cylinder circumference grassmann variable bosonic superfield chevalley generators c(2 ) commutation relations @xmath16=0 h_1{e_2}\pm}=\pm{e_2}^{\pm h_2{e_1}\pm}=\pm{e_1}^{\pm} ad{2}_{{e_1}{\pm}}{e_2}^{\pm}=0{2}_{{e_2}\pm}}{e_1}^{\pm}=0 h{\alpha}\alpha}}^{\pm}]=0(\alpha = 1,2),{\beta}}\pm\beta'}}{\mp}=\delta_{\beta ={aligned} supercommutator [ , ] defined @xmath17\equiv ad_{a } b\equiv ab- ( -1)^{p(a)p(b)}ba$ ] parity @xmath18 equal 1 odd elements equal 0 even c(2 ) @xmath19 even @xmath20 oddoperator ( 1 ) general evaluation representation @xmath4 @xmath21 @xmath22 chevalley generators @xmath4 commutation relations @xmath25=0, h_{\alpha_0}{\pm\alpha_1}]= e{\pm\alpha_1}_0\pm\alpha_0} h{\alpha_i}{\pm\alpha_i}]=_{\pm\alpha_i}\alpha_i{\mp\alpha_j}]=\delta_{i j_{\alpha_i} i , j=0,1 )\pm\alpha_0 e{\pm\alpha_1}=0\pm\alpha_0}=0\nonumber\end{aligned} @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 poisson brackets field @xmath30 drinfeld - sokolov reduction @xmath31 conditions components @xmath30 : @xmath32 @xmath33 .@xmath34-operator written miura form gauge transformation new superfield @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 generate superconformal algebra poisson brackets @xmath38 using infinite family i m involution under poisson brackets i m extracted from monodromy matrix @xmath39-operator@xcite : @xmath40 evolution equation @xmath41 susy n=1 kdv equation @xcite : @xmath42 components @xmath43 @xmath44 i m invariant under supersymmetry transformation @xmath45 construct monodromy matrix @xmath39-operator equivalent @xmath34 @xmath46 equivalence established linear problem @xmath34-operator @xmath47 operator representation @xmath4 @xmath48 vector expressing @xmath49 components @xmath49=@xmath50 @xmath51 and @xmath52 solution equation @xmath51 written @xmath53 \big\eta\nonumber\end{aligned} @xmath54 constant vector in representation @xmath4define monodromy matrix @xmath55{aligned introducing auxiliary @xmath1-operators : @xmath56 evaluation representation @xmath57 spectral parameter appears poisson bracket relation satisfied @xmath58 @xmath59 trigonometric @xmath4 r - matrix supertraces of monodromy matrices @xmath60 commute under poisson bracket @xmath61 expanding @xmath62 @xmath57 evaluation representation representation @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 where @xmath66 obtain i m from supertrace monodromy matrix poisson bracket relation supertraces different values spectral parameter infinite family of i m involutive build quantum counterparts of classical objects start from quantum miura transformation free field representation superconformal algebra @xmath67 @xmath68=\frac{i}{2}\beta^2_n={\beta^2\delta_{n+m,0}\beta^2\delta_{n+m,0} two types boundary conditions on @xmath69 : @xmath33sign `` + '' r sector @xmath69 integer modded '' ns sector @xmath69 half - integer modded variable @xmath70 13 equal zero r 1 ns expand @xmath71 @xmath72 modes @xmath73 @xmath75 @xmath76 generate superconformal algebra @xmath77(n - m)l_{n+m}+\frac{{c}}{8}(n^3-n)\delta_{n ({n}{2}-m)g_{m+n}_{n+m}+\delta_{n\frac{\hat{c}}{2}(n^2 - 1/4). classical limit @xmath78 @xmath79 ) substitution @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82{4}{c}} reduce algebra poisson bracket algebra susy n=1 kdv theory @xmath83 highest weight module oscillator algebra @xmath84 @xmath85 highest weight vector @xmath86 determined eigenvalue @xmath87 nilpotency condition positive modes @xmath88 @xmath89 r sector highest weight doubly degenerate zero mode @xmath90two ground states @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 superconformal algebra @xmath94 @xmath18 @xmath83 isomorphic to super - virasoro module highest weight vector @xmath86 : @xmath95 @xmath96 ns sector module two highest weight vectors ramond case @xmath97 space @xmath83 super - virasoro module splits into finite - dimensional subspaces by value @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 quantum versions local integrals motion act invariantly on subspaces @xmath101 diagonalization of i m reduces subspace @xmath102 to finite algebraic problem complicated for large @xmath103 ramond sector supersymmetry generator @xmath104 with i m @xmath91 @xmath92 independently without mixing ground states unlike super - kdv case @xcite ) obtained rtt - relation ( 21 ) quantum integrability condition consider model associated i m qism @xcite class systems wide contains superconformal models perturbations perturbations not break integrability appropriate for qism scheme @xmath197 @xmath198 operators vertex operators @xmath199topic special interest is scft with perturbation boundary related d - brane theory find eigenvalues transfer matrices main object study expansion in @xmath57 gives quantum i m two routes first based on fusion relations for transfer matrices @xmath200 root unity @xmath201 @xmath202 rational system fusion relations finite reduces to thermodynamic bethe ansatz equations another approach baxter q - operator method applied for all values @xmath201 values central charge construction q - operator fusion relations in paper under preparation grateful to f.a . smirnov discussions work supported by dynasty foundation rfbr grant 03 - 01 - 00593 | 0.557233 | 3,201 | 1,758 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,492 | on 2008 october 7 , small asteroid 2008 tc@xmath0 turned itself into the parent body of the first meteor ever to be predicted before entering the earth s atmosphere . over five years later , the 2014 aa event became the second instance of such an occurrence .
the uncertainties associated with the pre - impact orbit of 2008 tc@xmath0 are relatively small because thousands of observations were made during the hours preceding the actual meteor airburst . in sharp contrast ,
2014 aa was only observed seven times before impact and consequently its trajectory is somewhat uncertain .
here , we present a recalculation of the impact parameters location and timing of this meteor based on infrasound recordings .
the new values (@xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 ) = ( -44 , + 11 , 2456659.618 jd utc) and their uncertainties together with monte carlo and @xmath4-body techniques , are applied to obtain an independent determination of the pre - impact orbit of 2014 aa : @xmath5 = 1.1623 au , @xmath6 = 0.2116 , @xmath7 = 1@xmath84156 , @xmath9 = 101@xmath86086 , and @xmath10 = 52@xmath83393 .
our orbital solution is used to investigate the possible presence of known near - earth objects ( neos ) moving in similar orbits . among the objects singled out by this search ,
the largest is 2013 ho@xmath11 with an absolute magnitude of 23.0 ( diameter 75169 m ) and a moid of 0.006 au . prior to impact
, 2014 aa was subjected to a web of overlapping secular resonances and it followed a path similar to those of 2011 gj@xmath0 , 2011 jv@xmath12 , 2012 dj@xmath13 , and 2013 nj@xmath14 .
neos in this transient group have their orbits controlled by close encounters with the earth
moon system at perihelion and mars at aphelion , perhaps constituting a dynamical family .
extensive comparison with other studies is also presented . | on 2014 january 2 , asteroid 2014 aa became the second example of an object discovered just prior to hitting the earth ( brown 2014 ; jenniskens 2014 ) . over five years before this event occurred
, similarly small 2008 tc@xmath0 had stricken our planet hours after being first spotted ( chodas et al .
2009 ; jenniskens et al . 2009 ; oszkiewicz et al .
the fireball caused by the entry of 2008 tc@xmath0 was observed by the meteosat 8 weather satellite ( borovika & charvt 2009 ) ; no images of the atmospheric entry of 2014 aa have emerged yet , although there is robust evidence for an impact over the atlantic ocean ( chesley et al .
2015 ; farnocchia et al .
2016 ) less than a day after this small asteroid was discovered .
the uncertainty associated with the pre - impact orbit of 2008 tc@xmath0 is relatively small because thousands of observations were made during the hours preceding the actual strike ( chodas et al .
2009 ; jenniskens et al . 2009 ; kozubal et al . 2011 ; oszkiewicz et al .
in sharp contrast , 2014 aa was only observed seven times before impact ( kowalski et al .
2014 ) and consequently its pre - impact orbit is somewhat uncertain ( chesley et al . 2014 , 2015 ;
farnocchia et al .
both objects hit the earth about 20 hours after they were first detected ( farnocchia et al .
asteroid 2008 tc@xmath0 completely broke up over northern sudan on 2008 october 7 ( jenniskens et al .
2009 ) ; asteroid 2014 aa probably met a similar end over the atlantic ocean .
meteorites were collected from 2008 tc@xmath0 ( jenniskens et al .
2009 ) ; any surviving meteorites from 2014 aa were likely lost to the sea .
both 2008 tc@xmath0 and 2014 aa had similar sizes of a few metres .
such small asteroids or meteoroids ( diameter @xmath15 10 m ) are probably fragments of larger objects , which may also be fragments themselves .
the study of the orbital dynamics of such fragments is a subject of considerable practical interest because small bodies dominate the risk of unanticipated earth impacts with just local effects ( brown et al .
asteroid fragmentation could be induced by collisional processes ( e.g. dorschner 1974 ; ryan 2000 ) but also be the combined result of thermal fatigue ( e.g. apek & vokrouhlick 2010 ) and rotational ( e.g. walsh et al .
2008 ) or tidal stresses ( e.g. richardson et al . 1998 ; tth et al .
the present - day rate of catastrophic disruption events of asteroids in the main belt has been recently studied by denneau et al .
these authors have found that the frequency of this phenomenon is much higher than previously thought , with rotational disruptions being the dominant source of fragments .
production of fragments can be understood within the context of active asteroids ( see e.g. jewitt 2012 ; jewitt et al .
2015 ; drahus et al . 2015 ; agarwal et al .
2016 ) . here
, we revisit the topic of the impact parameters of 2014 aa , then apply monte carlo and @xmath4-body techniques to obtain an independent determination of the pre - impact orbit of 2014 aa .
the computed orbital solution is used to investigate the existence of near - earth objects ( neos ) moving in similar orbits .
this paper is organized as follows . in sect .
2 , we review what is currently known about 2014 aa . the atmospheric entry of 2014 aa is revisited in sect .
3 ; an improved impact solution ( location and timing ) , that is based on a refined analysis of infrasound recordings , is presented .
a monte carlo technique is used in sect . 4 to estimate the most probable , in geometric terms , pre - impact orbit .
an @xmath4-body approach is described and applied in sect . 5 to obtain a more realistic orbital solution . in sect .
6 , we provide an extensive and detailed comparison with results obtained by other authors and show that all the solutions published so far are reasonably consistent .
based on the new solution , the recent past orbital evolution of 2014 aa is reconstructed in sect .
7 . a number of perhaps dynamically - related small bodies are discussed in sect . 8 .
section 9 summarizes our conclusions . | 2014 january 2 asteroid 2014 aa second object discovered prior hitting earth ( brown 2014 ; jenniskens 2014 ) five years before event small 2008 tc@xmath0 stricken planet hours after spotted chodas 2009 jenniskens fireball 2008@xmath0 observed meteosat 8 satellite 2009 no images atmospheric entry 2014 aa emerged robust evidence for impact over atlantic ocean ( chesley 2015 ; farnocchia 2016 ) less than day after asteroid discovered uncertainty pre - impact orbit 2008 tc@xmath0 small thousands observations made hours preceding strike 2014 aa observed seven times before impact kowalski 2014 pre - impact orbit uncertain chesley both objects hit earth 20 hours after detected asteroid 2008 tc@xmath0 broke up over northern sudan 2008 october 7 jenniskens 2009 asteroid 2014 aa met similar end over atlantic ocean meteorites collected from 2008 tc@xmath0 surviving meteorites 2014 aa likely lost to sea both 2008 and 2014 aa similar sizes few metres small asteroids ( diameter @xmath15 10 m ) probably fragments of larger objectsstudy of orbital dynamics of fragments interest small bodies dominate risk earth impacts local effects brown et asteroid fragmentation could induced by collisional processes result thermal fatigue rotational or tidal stresses rate of catastrophic disruption events of asteroids in main belt studied by denneau et al frequency higher rotational disruptions dominant source of fragments production of fragments understood within context active asteroids jewitt 2012 2015 drahus et 2015 agarwal et al 2016 revisit impact parameters of 2014 aa apply monte carlo @xmath4-body techniques independent determination pre - impact orbit of 2014 aa computed orbital solution used to near - earth objects moving in similar orbits paper organized in sect . 2 review 2014 aa atmospheric entry revisited in sect . 3 improved impact solution location timing based on infrasound recordings presented monte carlo technique used in sect . 4 to estimate probable pre - impact orbit @xmath4-body approach described applied in sect . 5 realistic orbital solution sect .provide extensive comparison with other authors show solutions consistent new solution recent orbital evolution of 2014 aa reconstructed sect . dynamically - related small bodies discussed sect . 8 section 9 summarizes conclusions | 0.183605 | 1,052 | 505 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,495 | main parameters of future lepton - hadron colliders are estimated .
namely , thera and linac*lhc based ep , @xmath0p , ea , @xmath0a and fel@xmath0a colliders are considered .
the physics search potential of these machines are considered .
= 14.5pt | it is known that lepton - hadron collisions have been playing a crucial role in exploration of deep inside of matter . today , thera
( tesla on hera ) and linac*lhc can be considered as realistic candidates for future lepton - hadron and photon hadron colliders .
we discuss the main parameters and physics search potential of the lepton - hadron colliders and draw the attention of the high energy and nuclear physics communities to future @xmath1 and fel @xmath2 collider facilities .
it is known that the tesla collider will be a powerful tool for exploraiton of the multi - hundred gev scale @xcite .
taking into account the possible polarized proton and nucleus options for hera will provide a number of additional opportunities to investigate lepton - hadron and photon hadron interactions at tev scale .
recently , the work on tesla tdr has been finished , and tesla@xmath3hera based @xmath4 and @xmath2 colliders are included into tesla project .
main parameters of tesla@xmath5hera based @xmath6 collider are given in @xcite .
it is seen that one has @xmath7 @xmath8 with @xmath9 gev and @xmath10 @xmath11 . also two additional versions (
@xmath12 @xmath13 with @xmath14 @xmath8 and @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath13 with @xmath17 @xmath8 ) have been mentioned in tesla tdr . in principle , tesla@xmath3 hera based ep collider will extend the hera kinematics region by an order in both q@xmath18 and @xmath19 and , therefore , the parton saturation regime can be achieved .
main parameters and physics search potential of thera based @xmath20 * * * * collider are given in ciftci95 , brinkmann97 .
main limitations for @xmath21 option comes from fast emittance growth of nucleus beam due to intra - beam scattering . in our opinion @xmath2 option
is the most promising option of tesla@xmath3hera complex , because it will give unique opportunity to investigate small @xmath22 region in nuclear medium .
colliding of tesla fel beam with nucleus bunches from hera may give a unique possibility to investigate old nuclear phenomena in rather unusual conditions .
the main idea is very simple @xcite : ultra - relativistic ions will see laser photons with energy @xmath23 as a beam of photons with energy 2@xmath24 , where @xmath25 is the lorentz factor of the ion beam .
the region 0.1@xmath2610 mev , which is matter of interest for nuclear spectroscopy , corresponds to 0.1@xmath2710 kev lasers , which coincide with the energy region of tesla fel .
the center - of - mass energies which will be achieved at different options of this machine @xcite are an order larger than those at hera are and @xmath283 times larger than the energy region of tesla@xmath3hera .
center - of - mass energy and luminosity for this option are @xmath29 tev and @xmath30 @xmath31s@xmath32 this machine , which will extend both the @xmath33-range and @xmath34-range by more than two order of magnitude comparing to those explored by hera , has a strong potential for both standard model and new physics research . using @xmath20 * * * * option * * * * of * *
* * this collider thousands di - jets with @xmath35 gev and hundreds thousands single w bosons will be produced , hundred millions of @xmath36- and @xmath37- pairs will give opportunity to explore the region of extremely small x@xmath38 etc .
details on main parameters and physics search potential of linac*lhc based @xmath39 , @xmath2 and fel @xmath2 coliders can be found in brinkmann97,yavas00 .
the clic , an electron - positron collider with @xmath40 @xmath11 and @xmath41 @xmath42 is considered as one of the future options for post - lhc era at cern .
the work on clic*lhc based @xmath43 and fel @xmath2 options is under progress .
it seems that neither hera nor lhc@xmath3lep will be the end points for lepton - hadron colliders .
we see that tev scale linac - ring type @xmath6 machines will give an opportunity to go far in this direction ( see table 1 ) .
in addition , more knowledge on the subject can be found in @xcite . | lepton - hadron collisions in exploration deep matter thera linac*lhc candidates for future lepton - hadron photon hadron colliders discuss parameters physics search potential lepton - hadron colliders attention high energy nuclear physics communities to future @xmath1 @xmath2 collider facilities tesla collider tool for multi - hundred gev scale @xcite polarized proton nucleus options for hera opportunities lepton - hadron photon hadron interactions scale work on tesla tdr finished tesla@xmath3hera @xmath4 @xmath2 colliders included project parameters of tesla@xmath5hera @xmath6 collider in @xcite @xmath7 @xmath8 two additional versions @xmath12 in tesla tdr tesla@xmath3 hera collider hera kinematics region in q@xmath18 @xmath19 parton saturation regime parameters physics search potential of thera based @xmath20 collider in ciftci95 brinkmann97 limitations for @xmath21 option fast emittance growth nucleus beam intra - beam scattering@xmath2 option promising tesla@xmath3hera complex investigate small @xmath22 region nuclear medium colliding tesla fel beam nucleus hera investigate old nuclear phenomena unusual conditions idea ultra - relativistic ions see laser photons @xmath23 2@xmath24 @xmath25 lorentz factor ion beam region 0.1@xmath2610 mev nuclear spectroscopy corresponds 0.1@xmath2710 kev lasers energy region tesla fel center - of - mass energies options @xcite larger hera @xmath283 times larger tesla@xmath3hera center - of - mass energy luminosity @xmath29 tev @xmath30 @xmath31s@xmath32 @xmath33-range @xmath34-range two magnitude strong potential standard model new research @xmath20 option collider thousands di - jets with @xmath35 gev hundreds single w bosons produced millions @xmath36- @xmath37- pairs explore region small x@xmath38 details parameters physics search potential linac*lhc based @xmath39 @xmath2 @xmath2 coliders brinkmann97,yavas00clic electron - positron collider with @xmath40 future post - lhc era at cern work on clic*lhc @xmath43 @xmath2 options progress neither hera lhc@xmath3lep end points for lepton - hadron colliders tev scale linac - ring @xmath6 machines opportunity far table 1 more knowledge @xcite | 0.178492 | 1,029 | 551 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,506 | the response of low - dimensional solid objects combines geometry and physics in unusual ways , exemplified in structures of great utility such as a thin - walled tube that is ubiquitous in nature and technology .
here we provide a particularly surprising consequence of this confluence of geometry and physics in tubular structures : the anomalously large persistence of a localized pinch in an elastic pipe whose effect decays very slowly as an oscillatory exponential with a persistence length that diverges as the thickness of the tube vanishes , which we confirm experimentally .
the result is more a consequence of geometry than material properties , and is thus equally applicable to carbon nanotubes as it is to oil pipelines . | cylindrical structures are ubiquitous in nature and technology over a range of length scales , from carbon nanotubes and cytoskeletal microtubules to aircraft fuselages .
the separation of geometric scales inherent in these structures gives them their large specific stiffness ( per unit weight ) and endows them with strongly geometrical modes of deformation that involve faceting and other localized modes when subject to pressure , compression , twisting and bending .
here we focus on a peculiar global mode of deformation that is also ubiquitous .
our starting point is the simple observation that when a paper or plastic drinking straw of length @xmath0 , radius @xmath1 and thickness @xmath2 ( @xmath3 ) is pinched at an end so that it becomes elliptical locally , as shown in figure [ fig1 ] ( try it yourself ) ; the deformation of the straw persists over a length that is much larger than the radius of the straw .
this raises a natural question : what is the persistence length of a pinch ? to analyze this , we start with the equations of equilibrium for a shallow cylindrical shell , the von karman- donnell equations
@xcite : @xmath4 here @xmath5 , @xmath6 is the deflection of the cylinder relative to its naturally curved state parametrized in terms of the azimuthal coordinate @xmath7 and the axial coordinate @xmath8 , @xmath9 is the airy stress function whose derivatives are the components of the in - plane stress tensor , @xmath10 etc . , and @xmath11 is the bending stiffness of the sheet of material with young s modulus @xmath12 and poisson s ratio @xmath13 .
the first equation quantifies the balance of forces perpendicular to the cylinder surface , while the second is a geometric compatibility relation involving the in - plane strains .
we note that the karman - donnell system is one of the simplest of a class of approximate equations of increasing sophistication for the deformations of elastic shells @xcite ; however they are sufficient to explain the phenomena at hand as we shall see .
when one end of the cylinder is pinched locally exciting the first elliptical mode in the azimuthal direction , we assume that the axial variations induced are on length scales large compared to the radius . thus suggests a solution of the form @xmath14 . substituting into eq .
( [ vonkarmaneqn ] ) , and keeping only the leading order terms , we find that @xmath15 where @xmath16 , and we have dropped the nonlinear terms in ( [ vonkarmaneqn ] ) . eliminating the function @xmath17 from the above equations , we find that the amplitude of the deformation @xmath18 satisfies the linear equation @xmath19 it is useful at this point to recall that the balance of forces on an elastic beam supported on an elastic foundation of stiffness @xmath20 leads to a fourth order equation @xcite @xmath21 . indeed , for axisymmetric deformations of a cylindrical shell , @xmath22 , so that @xmath23 , which while superficially similar to ( [ wfinaleqn ] ) is qualitatively different ; in the limit @xmath24 , the former equation is of a singularly perturbed type exhibiting boundary - layer like regions where the solution changes rapidly , quite unlike ( [ wfinaleqn ] ) . indeed , we can see this immediately by noting that the general solution to ( [ wfinaleqn ] ) is @xmath25^{1/4}. \label{scaling}\ ] ] where the amplitude @xmath26 and the phase @xmath27 are determined by the boundary conditions at the end where the pipe is pinched .
thus an applied pinch of amplitude @xmath26 decays as an oscillatory exponential with a characteristic persistence length @xmath28 , for typical materials ( @xmath29 $ ] ) , a scaling hinted at in @xcite with no derivation .
the ellipticity induced by the pinch rotates slowly as one progresses along the pipe , analogous to the polarization of a wave . since @xmath30
, our assumption that the shape and stress have variations with gradients that are smaller in the axial direction than in the azimuthal direction is justified .
we also observe that the persistence length is determined primarily by the geometry of the tube ; the dependence on the material properties via poisson s ratio is very weak since @xmath31 $ ] for isotropic materials .
even more surprising is the anomalous and counter - intuitive divergence of the persistence length as the thickness of the tube vanishes or as the radius of the cylinder diverges , i.e. as the tube is flattened .
this geometric amplification is a result in sharp contrast with the focusing that leads to the generation of fine scales and singularities in the inhomogeneous deformation of thin films in such instances as wrinkling and crumpling .
the above linearized analysis is valid only for small deformations in light of the approximate nature of the von - karman - donnell equations and our asymptotic analysis . to check the validity of our analysis
, we carried out numerical simulations using the finite element method .
the pinch was applied incrementally and a commercial package abaqus was used to minimize the elastic energy of a linear isotropic solid in a slender geometry . for very thin shells ,
this elastic energy density that is minimized is approximately : @xmath32 \nonumber \\ & + & \frac{et^3}{24(1-\sigma^2 ) } \left[({\kappa_1}+ { \kappa_2})^2 - 2 ( 1-\sigma ) ( \kappa_1 \kappa_2 - \tau^2 ) \right ] .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath33 are the in - plane extensional and shear strains and @xmath34 are the curvatures and twist relative to the undeformed state of the tube .
the first term in the expression accounts for in - plane deformations and the second term accounts for out - of - plane deformations .
four - node , quadrilateral shell elements with reduced integration and a large - deformation formulation to account for the finite curvatures of the shell were used in calculations .
a sensitivity study was conducted to ensure the independence of the results on the computational mesh .
we considered very thin isotropic and homogeneous elastic tubes which were pinched symmetrically at one end with a prescribed indentation deformation @xmath35 .
the tubes were assumed to be made of linearly elastic material ( with young s modulus @xmath36 mpa and poisson s ratio @xmath37 ) of varying @xmath2 in our simulations , with @xmath38 . in figure [ fig2 ]
we see that the tube responds with an oscillatory deformation of varying ellipticity consistent with our simple analytical predictions . in fig . , [ fig3 ]
, we show that the persistence length measured numerically by following the period of oscillation of the ellipticity also follows our analytical predictions ; the numerical experiments were carried out for tubes of various @xmath39 keeping the applied pinch amplitude @xmath26 and the tube radius @xmath1 constant . in the inset
we show that the amplitude of the deformation of the tube decays exponentially away from the location of the pinch .
however , there is a discrepancy between the prefactor of the wavelength determined numerically and that in ( [ scaling ] ) which may be attributed to the approximate nature of the von karman - donnell equations and our linearized analysis thereof .
we also carried out experiments with long straws and tubes of various thickness ( ranging from 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm ) and radii ( ranging from 3 mm to 12.5 mm ) .
the images of the pinched straws were taken with a digital camera and were analyzed using the canny edge - detection - algorithm in matlab to extract the information on boundaries of the deformed profile .
the thickness and radius of the tubes were measured using slide calipers . in fig .
[ fig3 ] , we show that the experimentally measured values of the persistence length match the numerical simulations and are consistent with the scaling derived analytically .
before we discuss our results , it is worthwhile to compare and contrast our results for the persistence of a pinch in cylinder with that of a pinch in a narrow flat plate of width @xmath40 and length @xmath41 ( equivalently , we could consider periodically pinched sheet such as a drape ) .
when such a sheet is pinched at an end to make it slightly narrower so that the amplitude of the pinch is @xmath42 , casual observations show that the persistence of the pinch is much larger than the width of the strip . to understand this persistence
, we note that the dominant component of the curvature scales as as @xmath43 so that bending energy in the sheet is roughly @xmath44 , where @xmath45 is the persistence length of a pinch . over this length scale ,
the sheet is weakly curved in two directions so that it must be stretched ( since the gauss curvature of a doubly curved surface is non - zero , it follows from gauss s theorema egregium that it must have been stretched ) , with a typical strain that scales as @xmath46 , costing an energy that scales as @xmath47 . minimizing the sum of the bending and stretching energy , we see that the persistence length of a pinch scales as @xmath48 @xcite , showing a clear dependence on the amplitude of the pinch . however , for a pinched pipe , when @xmath49 , we find that @xmath50 consistent with the result obtained here .
some immediate implications follow from our results : in molecular carbon nanotubes @xcite or cytoskeletal microtubules @xcite our result suggest how mechanical strains may be transmitted over long distances along tubes . since the energy associated with pinching the pipe scales as @xmath51 , the stiffness associated with a pinching deformation scales as @xmath52 is quite small , and raises the question of whether nature might already use this mode .
on mesoscales , a dramatic example of the failure of tubes is afforded by the flip - flop buckle propagation in submarine pipelines @xcite , wherein a pipe flattens for a while in one direction and then in an orthogonal direction , with a characteristic length scale of the flattened regions .
our result complements numerical simulations of the process @xcite by providing a simple explanation for the flip - flop which we interpret as a simple consequence of a globally deformed tubular shell induced for example by a local pinch .
then , an oscillatory elliptic mode follows naturally , and sets the stage for dynamic and plastic buckling that will likely lead to a flip - flop mode of propagation .
thus our calculation immediately suggests a criterion for the design of buckle arrestors - which might be spaced at a distance comparable to @xmath53 .
finally , on planetary length scales , the curved nature of continental and oceanic plates together with our calculation suggests a possible mechanism for the very long scale persistence of deformations induced by the curvature of the crust that would otherwise sink far more quickly under its own weight @xcite . | cylindrical structures ubiquitous in nature technology from carbon nanotubes cytoskeletal microtubules to aircraft fuselages separation of geometric scales gives large specific stiffness per unit weight geometrical modes of deformation faceting localized modes subject to pressure compression twisting bending focus on global mode deformation ubiquitous paper plastic drinking straw of length radius thickness pinched end becomes elliptical locally in figure deformation persists over length larger than radius persistence length of pinch ? start with equations of equilibrium for shallow cylindrical shell von karman- donnell equations @xmath4 deflection of cylinder relative to naturally curved state azimuthal coordinate @xmath7 axial coordinate @xmath9 airy stress function in - plane stress tensor @xmath11 bending stiffness of sheet material with young s modulus @xmath12 poisson s ratio @xmath13 first equation quantifies balance of forces perpendicular to cylinder surface second geometric compatibility relation in - plane strainskarman - donnell system simplest equations for deformations elastic shells sufficient to explain phenomena end cylinder pinched first elliptical mode axial variations on length scales large compared to radius suggests solution form @xmath14 substituting into ( [ vonkarmaneqn ] ) keeping leading order terms @xmath15 @xmath16 dropped nonlinear terms eliminating function @xmath17 amplitude of deformation @xmath18 satisfies linear equation @xmath19 balance of forces on elastic beam elastic foundation @xmath20 leads to fourth order equation @xcite @xmath21 axisymmetric deformations of cylindrical shell @xmath22 @xmath23 similar to wfinaleqn ] qualitatively different limit @xmath24 former equation singularly perturbed type boundary - layer like regions solution changes rapidly unlike ( [ wfinaleqn ] ) general solution to ( [ wfinaleqn ] ) is @xmath25^{1/4} amplitude @xmath26 phase @xmath27 determined by boundary conditions at end pipe pinchedapplied pinch @xmath26 decays oscillatory exponential characteristic persistence length @xmath28 typical materials @xmath29 scaling hinted @xcite no derivation ellipticity pinch rotates slowly pipe analogous to polarization wave since @xmath30 assumption shape stress variations gradients smaller axial azimuthal justified persistence length determined by geometry tube on material properties poisson s ratio weak since @xmath31 for isotropic materials anomalous divergence persistence length as thickness tube vanishes or radius cylinder diverges tube flattened geometric amplification contrast with focusing fine scales singularities inhomogeneous deformation of thin films wrinkling crumpling linearized analysis valid for small deformations von - karman - donnell equations asymptotic analysis check validity numerical simulations finite element method pinch applied incrementally commercial package abaqus used minimize elastic energy linear isotropic solid in slender geometrythin shells elastic energy density approximately @xmath32{et^3}{24(1-\sigma^2 )\left[\kappa_1}+ \kappa_2})^2 - 2 1-\sigma \kappa_1_2 - \tau^2 ){aligned @xmath33 in - plane extensional shear strains @xmath34 curvatures twist undeformed state tube first term in - plane deformations second term out - of - plane deformations four - node quadrilateral shell elements reduced integration large - deformation formulation finite curvatures used sensitivity study conducted independence thin isotropic homogeneous elastic tubes pinched symmetrically end indentation deformation @xmath35 tubes assumed linearly elastic material young s modulus @xmath36 poisson s ratio @xmath37 varying @xmath2 @xmath38 tube responds oscillatory deformation varying ellipticity consistent analytical predictions persistence length measured period oscillation ellipticity follows analytical predictions numerical experiments tubes @xmath39 pinch amplitude @xmath26 tube radius @xmath1 constantamplitude deformation tube decays from location pinch discrepancy between prefactor wavelength determined numerically scaling attributed to von karman - donnell equations linearized analysis experiments with long straws tubes various thickness 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm radii 3 mm to 12.5 mm ) images of pinched straws taken with digital camera analyzed using canny edge - detection - algorithm in matlab information deformed profile thickness radius tubes measured using slide calipers fig fig3 experimentally measured values persistence length match numerical simulations consistent with scaling derived analytically compare contrast results persistence pinch in cylinder with pinch in narrow flat plate of width @xmath40 length @xmath41 periodically pinched sheet drape when sheet pinched end narrower amplitude pinch @xmath42 persistence pinch larger than width strip dominant component curvature scales as @xmath43 bending energy in sheet is roughly @xmath44 @xmath45 is persistence length of pinchlength scale sheet curved two directions must be stretched gauss curvature doubly curved surface non - zero follows from gauss s theorema egregium must stretched typical strain scales @xmath46 energy @xmath47 minimizing bending stretching energy persistence length pinch scales @xmath48 @xcite dependence on amplitude pinch pinched pipe @xmath49 @xmath50 consistent with result implications molecular carbon nanotubes cytoskeletal microtubules mechanical strains transmitted over long distances tubes energy pinching pipe scales @xmath51 stiffness pinching deformation scales @xmath52 small question nature might use mode mesoscales example failure of tubes flip - flop buckle propagation in submarine pipelines pipe flattens one direction orthogonal characteristic length scale of flattened regions result complements simulations explanation for flip - flop consequence of deformed tubular shell induced by local pinch oscillatory elliptic mode follows sets stage for dynamic plastic buckling flip - flop mode propagation calculation suggests criterion for design of buckle arrestors spaced distance comparable to @xmath53planetary length scales curved of continental oceanic plates our calculation suggests mechanism long scale persistence of deformations curvature crust sink quickly under weight | 0.430111 | 2,331 | 1,182 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,507 | @xmath0 production is considered to be a sensitive probe of the properties of quark gluon plasma created in nucleus+nucleus collisions at rhic . in this article , the recent analysis of mid - rapidity ( @xmath1 ) @xmath0 production via the dielectron decay channel in au+au ( year 2007 ) and cu+cu ( year 2005 ) collisions at @xmath2 = 200 gev at star is reported .
it is compared to star p+p results in order to study the nuclear modification factor as a function of transverse momentum and centrality .
the results are compared to previously published data and available theoretical models . | suppression of @xmath0 production due to screening of the binding potential of charm and anti - charm quarks in hot and dense matter is a classic signature of the quark gluon plasma formation @xcite and has been intensively studied in previous years .
the na50@xcite and na60@xcite experiments at cern - sps ( at @xmath2 = 17.3 gev ) observed a strong suppression of @xmath0 as a function of centrality . the results from the phenix collaboration at rhic show that the @xmath0 suppression for @xmath3 5 gev / c at mid - rapidity is similar to that observed at sps energies@xcite , although the energy density and temperature reached at rhic are much higher than at sps . on the other hand , the suppression at forward rapidity is stronger than at mid - rapidity .
such a pattern suggests that additional processes other than @xmath0 dissociation take place , such as recombination of charm quarks , sequential dissociation of exited charmonia states or feeddown from b - mesons , may compensate for @xmath0 dissociation .
one of the interesting developments is the so called hot wind dissociation@xcite .
using ads / cft duality , it was predicted that the @xmath0 effective dissociation temperature decreases with increasing @xmath0 velocity . at rhic energies ,
the expectation from the hot wind model is that the system temperature should be below the @xmath0 effective dissociation temperature for @xmath0 with @xmath4 5 gev / c , and above for higher @xmath5 , and therefore the suppression is expected to be stronger at high @xmath5 .
these predictions can be tested with @xmath0 measurements at high transverse momentum .
in addition to the study of @xmath0 interactions with the medium produced in nuclear collisions , charmonium production in proton collisions is of interest in its own right . the production is not well understood as several mechanisms can play a role .
these include direct production via gluon fusion , whether the state is formed through color singlet or octet , the contributions from parton fragmentation , and feeddown from other charmonium states and b - mesons . at the moment
no model explains the major features of the existing data@xcite .
the measurement of high-@xmath5 @xmath0 in nucleus - nucleus collisions , together with high-@xmath5 @xmath0 p+p data , might shed some light on charmonium production . in this paper , the recent studies of @xmath0 production in au+au and cu+cu from the star experiment are presented .
we report and discuss the measurements of the nuclear modification factor as a function of transverse momentum and centrality .
the study of low-@xmath5 @xmath0 production ( @xmath6 5 gev / c ) has been done using minimum bias data in cu+cu ( year 2005 ) and au+au ( year 2007 ) collisions at @xmath2 = 200 gev while the high-@xmath5 @xmath0 were studied using triggered data collected in cu+cu collisions . in the analysis reported here
, the @xmath0 were reconstructed through the di - electron decay channel ( branching ratio = 5.9% ) .
star is well suited for such studies , as the large acceptance time projection chamber ( tpc ) provides electron identification at moderate @xmath5 ( via de / dx measurements ) , and at high-@xmath5 the barrel electromagnetic calorimeter ( bemc ) is a very effective tool to identify electrons .
the bemc can be also used for fast online triggering to enrich the electron sample . in the case of minimum - bias cu+cu collisions ( 0 - 60% of total cross - section , 27 m events )
only de / dx from the star tpc was used to identify electrons and reject hadrons . for minimum - bias au+au collisions ( 0 - 80% of total cross - section , 64 m events ) ,
the bemc provided an additional cut on the ratio of track momentum to energy . to improve the signal - to - background ratio ,
a cut of @xmath7 1.1 gev / c in cu+cu ( @xmath7 1.2 gev / c in au+au ) was applied for each electron selected in the studies . for the high-@xmath5 @xmath0 analysis ,
the bemc triggered data for cu+cu collisions ( year 2005 ) were used with transverse energy threshold @xmath83.75 gev ( integrated luminosity @xmath9 @xmath10 ) .
the higher-@xmath5 electron is identified using combined information from the bemc ( tower energy ) , the shower max detector embedded in bemc ( shower shape ) and de / dx measured in tpc , while only tpc is used to identify the second electron . to ensure a clean @xmath0 identification , @xmath5 cuts of 3.5 gev / c for the higher-@xmath5 electron and 1.5 gev / c for the lower-@xmath5
electron were applied .
figure [ jpsisignal ] shows the @xmath11 invariant mass distributions in au+au at @xmath2 = 200 gev . on the left plot ,
the signal and background distribution before background subtraction are presented for au+au , while on the right plot the @xmath0 invariant mass after background subtraction is shown .
the background in the case of au+au , as well as for cu+cu collisions , was estimated by the event mixing technique and normalized to the total number of like -sign pairs .
the shape of the @xmath0 mass peak is well described by a crystal ball function@xcite . despite rather high background level ( signal - to - background ratio = 1/13 for cu+cu and 1/28 for au+au )
we have observed a prominent @xmath0 signal with significance of 4.5@xmath12 in cu+cu and 6.5@xmath12 in au+au collisions .
the @xmath0 signal in au+au is promising and the studies are underway .
the @xmath0 @xmath5 spectrum presented on fig .
[ ptspectrum ] shows star s ability to measure the production of low and high @xmath5 @xmath0 .
the recent star upgrades , namely new time - of - flight detector and fast tpc daq system , will greatly improve the low-@xmath5 @xmath0 measurements .
the nuclear modification factor ( @xmath13 ) for @xmath0 as a function of centrality ( represented by number of participants ) ( left panel ) and @xmath5 ( right panel ) for cu+cu at @xmath2 = 200 gev are presented on fig . [ raa ] and compared to phenix results@xcite .
the @xmath13 vs @xmath14 was obtained using minimum - bias cu+cu collisions only .
the results are consistent with previously published data but , due to relatively modest statistics , the results have limited discrimination power . the @xmath13 vs @xmath5 for high-@xmath5 @xmath0
is presented for top @xmath15 and @xmath16 cu+cu collisions@xcite .
the @xmath13 seems to increase with @xmath5 and it is consistent with unity for @xmath5 @xmath17 5 gev / c : the average of the two star @xmath18 data points gives @xmath13 = 1.4 @xmath19 0.4 ( stat . ) @xmath19 0.2 ( syst . ) .
the dashed curve shows the predictions of an ads / cft - based calculation embedded in a hydrodynamic model with hot wind dissociation incorporated - the data contradict the predicted @xmath5 dependence .
the dotted line represents calculations of the so called two component model@xcite which includes @xmath0 dissociation , statistical @xmath20 coalescence , @xmath0 formation time effects and b - meson feeddown .
the model describes the overall trend of the data fairly well . the same calculations but without bottom feeddown and finite formation time , predict decrease of @xmath13 with @xmath5 which may suggest the important role of these effects .
on the other hand the recent star results show the b - meson feeddown contribution to @xmath0 production at high @xmath5 is relatively small , on the level of 13%@xcite .
the solid and dash - dot lines provide a comparison to open charm @xmath13 .
the solid line is based on the whdg model@xcite for charm energy loss for @xmath18 cu+cu .
the calculations include the elastic as well as radiative parton energy loss and the predictions were obtained with medium gluon density @xmath21 .
the dash - dotted line are results of the glv model@xcite for d - meson energy loss . in this approach
the heavy meson suppression is described by collisional dissociation in quark - gluon plasma with @xmath22 .
both calculations correctly describe heavy flavor suppression in au+au , thus one would expect a strong suppression for @xmath0 as well for @xmath5 @xmath17 5 gev / c when they traverse through the medium carrying color charges , which is in contrast to the data .
these results may suggest the high-@xmath5 @xmath0 production is dominated by the color singlet channel but other processes , like bottom feeddown or finite formation time , can compensate for the predicted suppression .
it is worth to mention that the finite formation time , required to build the @xmath0 wave function , is expected to reduce the dissociation cross section for @xmath23 compared to fully formed charmonium . in case of longer formation time
, some portion of @xmath0 is produced outside the medium and therefore it should be sensitive to gluons and charm quark energy loss in the quark - gluon plasma .
we reported recent studies of @xmath0 production in nucleus - nucleus collisions at star .
the @xmath0 @xmath13 seems to increase with @xmath5 and we observed no suppression for @xmath5 @xmath17 5 gev / c .
the lack of @xmath0 suppression at high-@xmath5 is in contrast to the predictions for substantial suppression of charm quarks and open charm@xcite at similar @xmath5 , and this may suggest that @xmath0 in this @xmath5 range is produced mostly via the color single channel .
00 t. matsui and h. satz , _ phys .
b _ * 178 * ( 1986 ) 416 .
m. c. abreu it et al .
[ na50 collaboration ] , _ phys .
b _ * 410 * ( 1997 ) 327 .
b. alessandro et al .
[ na50 collaboration ] , _ eur .
j. c _ * 39 * ( 2005 ) 335 [ arxiv:0412036 ] .
r. arnaldi et al .
[ na60 collaboration ] , _ phys .
* 99 * ( 2007 ) 132302 .
a. adare et al .
[ phenix collaboration ] , _ phys .
* 98 * ( 2007 ) 232301 [ arxiv:0611020 ] .
h. liu , k. rajagopal and u. a. wiedmann , _ phys .
* 98 * ( 2007 ) 182301 .
j. p. lansberg , _ int .
j. mod .
a _ * 21 * ( 2006 ) 3857 [ arxiv:0602091 ] .
j. p. lansberg , [ arxiv:0811.4005 ] .
j. gaiser,``charmonium spectroscopy from radiative decays of the j / psi and psi - prime '' , slac - r-255 a. adare et al .
[ phenix collaboration ] , _ phys .
lett . _ * 101 * ( 2008 ) 122301 [ arxiv:0801.0220 ] .
b. i. abelev et al .
[ star collaboration ] , [ arxiv:0904.0439 ] .
x. zhao and r. rapp , [ arxiv:0806.1239v1 ] s. wicks et al .
a _ * 784 * ( 2007 ) 426 , and w. a. horowitz private communication .
a. adil and i. vitev , _ phys .
b _ * 649 * ( 2007 ) 139 , and i. vitev private communication . | suppression @xmath0 production due binding potential charm anti - charm quarks in hot dense matter signature quark gluon plasma formation studied na50 na60 experiments at cern - sps = 17.3 gev observed strong suppression @xmath0 centrality results phenix collaboration at rhic show @xmath0 suppression for @xmath3 5 gev / c at mid - rapidity similar sps energies@xcite energy density temperature at rhic higher suppression at forward rapidity stronger mid - suggests additional processes recombination charm quarks sequential dissociation exited charmonia states feeddown b - mesons may compensate dissociation hot wind dissociation@xcite @xmath0 effective dissociation temperature decreases with increasing @xmath0 velocity at rhic energies system temperature below effective dissociation temperature with @xmath4 5 gev / c above for higher @xmath5 suppression stronger at high @xmath5 predictions tested with @xmath0 measurements at high transverse momentum interactions collisions charmonium production in proton collisions interest not several mechanismsinclude production via gluon fusion state color singlet or octet contributions from parton fragmentation feeddown from charmonium states b - mesons no model explains features data@xcite measurement high-@xmath5 @xmath0 in nucleus - collisions p+p data might light on charmonium production recent studies of @xmath0 production in au+au cu+cu star experiment presented nuclear modification factor transverse momentum centrality study low-@xmath5 @xmath0 production 5 gev / c using minimum bias data cu au+au 2007 collisions at = 200 gev high-@xmath5 @xmath0 studied using triggered data cu+cu collisions @xmath0 reconstructed through di - electron decay channel branching ratio = 5.9% ) star for studies projection chamber provides electron identification at moderate @xmath5 high-@xmath5 barrel electromagnetic calorimeter for fast online triggering electron sample minimum - bias cu+cu collisions 0 - 60% de / dx star tpc electrons reject hadrons minimum - bias au+au collisions 0 - 80% bemc cut on ratio track momentum to energysignal - to - background ratio cut @xmath7 1.1 gev / c cu+cu 1.2 gev / c au+au applied each electron high-@xmath5 analysis bemc data cu+cu collisions 2005 used transverse energy threshold @xmath83.75 gev luminosity @xmath9 higher-@xmath5 electron identified using information bemc shower max detector de / dx tpc tpc second electron clean @xmath0 identification cuts 3.5 gev / c higher- 1.5 gev / c lower- applied shows @xmath11 invariant mass distributions au+au at @xmath2 = 200 gev left signal background distribution before subtraction au+au @xmath0 invariant mass after background subtraction background estimated by event mixing normalized to like -sign pairs shape @xmath0 mass peak described crystal ball function@xcite high background level ratio 1/13 cu+cu 1/28 au+au prominent @xmath0 signal significance 4.5@xmath12 cu+cu 6.5@xmath12 au+au collisions @xmath0 signal au+au promising studies underway @xmath0 spectrum fig ptspectrum shows star production low high @xmath5 star upgrades time - - flight detector fast tpc daq system improve low- measurements nuclear modification factor @xmath13 @xmath0 centrality @xmath5 cu @xmath2 = 200 gev presented fig . compared phenix results @xmath13 vs @xmath14 minimum - bias cu+cu collisions results consistent with data statistics limited discrimination power @xmath13 vs @xmath5 high-@xmath5 top @xmath15 @xmath16 cu+cu collisions @xmath13 with @xmath5 consistent unity @xmath5 5 gev average two star @xmath18 data points gives @xmath13 = 1.4 @xmath19 0.4 0.2 dashed curve shows predictions ads / cft - based calculation hydrodynamic model hot wind dissociation data contradict @xmath5 dependence dotted line represents calculations two component model@xcite @xmath0 dissociation statistical @xmath20 coalescence formation time effects b - meson feeddown model describes trend calculations predict decrease @xmath13 with @xmath5 rolerecent star results show b - meson feeddown contribution to @xmath0 production small 13%@xcite solid - dot lines comparison to open charm @xmath13 solid line based whdg model for charm energy loss @xmath18 calculations include elastic radiative parton energy loss predictions with medium gluon density @xmath21 glv model for d - meson energy loss heavy meson suppression described by collisional dissociation in quark - gluon plasma with @xmath22 calculations describe heavy flavor suppression in au+au strong suppression for @xmath0 @xmath5 5 gev / c color charges results suggest high-@xmath5 production dominated by color singlet channel other processes bottom feeddown finite formation time can compensate suppression finite formation time dissociation cross section for @xmath23 longer @xmath0 produced outside medium sensitive to gluons charm energy loss @xmath0 production in nucleus - collisions at star with @xmath5 no suppression for @xmath5 @xmath17 5 gev / clack @xmath0 suppression high-@xmath5 predictions suppression charm quarks open charm@xcite similar @xmath5 suggest @xmath0 produced color single channel matsui h. satz . 178 * ( 1986 ) 416 abreu na50 collaboration phys 410 * ( 1997 ) 327 alessandro na50 collaboration 39 2005 ) 335 arxiv:0412036 ] arnaldi na60 collaboration . 99 * 2007 ) 132302 adare collaboration phys 98 2007 ) 232301 arxiv:0611020 ] h liu rajagopal wiedmann 98 2007 ) 182301 p. lansberg mod 21 * ( 2006 ) 3857 arxiv:0602091 lansberg arxiv:0811.4005 ] gaiser,``charmonium spectroscopy radiative decays j psi psi - prime - r-255 adare phenix collaboration phys. 101 * ( 2008 ) 122301 arxiv:0801.0220 ] abelev star collaboration arxiv:0904.0439 ] x. zhao r. rapp arxiv:0806.1239v1 wicks et al 784 * ( 2007 ) 426 horowitz private communication adil.vitev phys 649 2007 ) 139 vitev private communication | 0.433381 | 2,847 | 1,445 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,519 | this paper presents a theoretical model intended to address the question of energy transfer in two - dimensional molecular assemblies such as scheibe aggregates .
a new phonon - exciton interaction is introduced to explain the exciton width in j aggregates .
it is shown that the long range energy transport can occur for weakly interacting acceptors . | compact and regular two dimensional arrangements of oxycyanine dye bound to hydrophobic carbon tails show remarkably narrow absorption and fluorescence peaks [ 1 - 5 ] . in these so called j - aggregates
it is believed that the excitation of a dye molecule becomes delocalized ( exciton ) due to the strong dipole - dipole interactions between delocalized electrons in adjacent dye molecules .
it was also shown [ 3 - 5 ] that these structures can support practically loss - free energy transport over large distances .
molecules of a suitable acceptor ( a molecule similar to that used in j - aggregate , but with thiocyanine instead of oxycyanine ) were able to absorb almost all the energy , even at concentrations as low as 1:10 000 .
it is , however , astonishing , that energy transport is more efficient when the coupling to the acceptor is weak [ 5 ] .
quantum mechanical mechanism of this effect was developed in [ 7,8 ] in terms of exciton trapping by shallow bound state of large spatial extend .
however , the theory assumed ideal excitons , which would imply extremely small absorption width in j - aggregate . clearly a dissipation mechanism is needed to explain the observed experimentally absorption width , which , moreover , should not destroy the delicate exciton trapping needed to explain long range energy transport .
investigation of possible dissipation mechanisms is the aim of this paper .
it will be shown that the usually assumed [ 6 ] exciton - phonon coupling is not up to the task and that only a mechanism destroying excitons will do .
we propose , therefore , a new phonon - exciton interaction , which has the required properties and , moreover , leads to a solvable model .
then we demonstrate that our interaction permits a long range energy transfer in two dimensional structures .
we start with the one dimensional hamiltonian for the excitons [ 6,7 ] .
we have @xmath0,\ ] ] where @xmath1 , @xmath2 are the creation and annihilation operators , respectively , of an excitation at site n , @xmath3 is the excitation energy of a single dye molecule and j is the resonant interaction energy between adjacent sites .
we use one dimensional formalism for simplicity s sake , two dimensional generalization is immediate .
hamiltonian ( 1 ) is diagonalized in momentum space .
introducing bloch waves with quasi momentum k we have @xmath4 our hamiltonian ( 1 ) is now @xmath5 with the dispersion relation @xmath6 again for simplicity we use scalar photons with the coupling to the dye within rotating wave approximation [ 8 ] , so the hamiltonian for the exciton - photon system is @xmath7 where the second integral is the energy of the photons with the usual dispersion relation @xmath8 and the last term is the photon - exciton interaction . note that the sum of exciton and phonon numbers is conserved ( by the virtue of rotating wave approximation ) and that we have delta of momentum conservation along the chain . at the momenta of interest
the molecular formfactor @xmath9 is practically a constant , which we denote @xmath10 , and its momentum dependence is of importance in loop integrals only : it gives the natural line width of an atomic state , much smaller than the experimentally observed width [ 8 ] .
it is important to realize that since the wavelength of visible light is of the order 1000 , this corresponds to momenta of the order @xmath11 @xmath12 , so to a good approximation light produces excitons with negligible momentum , i.e. from the bottom of the band . in this form
the model is analytically solvable . working within one photon - one exciton sector
we use for the wave function the ansatz @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the fock vacuum ( which is an exact eigenstate of the theory ) .
this leads to a system of equations for the unknown functions @xmath15 and @xmath16 @xmath17 where the photon wavefunction @xmath16 is a sum of plane and scattered wave @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the momentum of the incoming light . system ( 9 ) is easily solved and we get for the experimentally observed photon wavefunction @xmath20 as we see , the scattered wave has a cylindrical outgoing wave ( note the one dimensional delta function ) multiplied by scattering amplitude .
the absorption intensity is proportional therefore to @xmath21 where we have introduced the notation @xmath22 for small @xmath23 ( our case ) the real part of @xmath24 is negligible , while the imaginary part is @xmath25 the absorption probability has therefore the familiar lorentzian shape @xmath26 due to the smallness of @xmath10 [ 8 ] , the absorption peak has a finite , albeit very small with . in order to get a more realistic value , we need a dissipation mechanism , i.e. interaction with phonons .
like everybody else we assume that excitons interact with phonons , since the j - aggregate structure is not very stiff .
we take the phonon hamiltonian in the familiar form @xmath27 where @xmath28 , @xmath29 are the ( bosonic ) creation and annihilation operators for phonons with the dispersion relation @xmath30 one usually assumes a trilinear coupling exciton - phonon [ 6 ] @xmath31 however , this coupling does not change the exciton number : this interaction can only push excitons to the bottom of the band , but never destroy them ! since excitons are created with negligible momentum anyway , this mechanism , although certainly present , can not contribute significantly to the observed light absorption width .
we need therefore an interaction which will explicitly destroy excitons , regardless their energy .
the simplest possibility is the annihilation of an exciton into 2 phonons .
after all , the excited dye molecule contains a delocalized electron , which can not only reradiate light , but also give up its energy to the vibrations of the whole structure .
we of course realize that it is difficult for two phonons to carry away 2 - 3 ev of energy , so we call them effective. we therefore propose the interaction in the form @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the formfactor , which , for the sake of simplicity , we assume is constant .
our interaction has the great advantage that it leads to a solvable model .
our excitons coupled to photons and phonons are described by a free part @xmath34 and the interactions @xmath35 one exciton sector is solved by the ansatz @xmath36 which leads to a coupled set of equations @xmath37 where the energy is @xmath38 the scattered photon wave function can be written in the form @xmath39 where we have introduced the function @xmath40 absorption cross section is therefore proportional to @xmath41 remembering that excitons are created with zero momentum we need the function ( 26 ) at k=0 , we have @xmath42 assuming linear dispersion for the phonons ( cf . eq .
16 ) we can perform the integration explicitly @xmath43 the logarithm does not play , numerically speaking , any significant role , therefore we have obtained a familiar lorentzian shape .
its width is given by @xmath44 and depends on @xmath45 and @xmath46 .
since experimentally it is of the order of 0.026 ev , we can estimate @xmath45 if we assume @xmath46 , which we arbitrally have taken to be 4.0 ev .
the @xmath47 parameter gives the position of the absorption peak , taking it to be 3.104 ev we get an excellent agreement with the experiment .
presence of an acceptor molecule , which we place at site @xmath48 , introduces an additional term in the exciton hamiltonian , which now reads @xmath0-(\omega-\omega_{0})a_{0}^{+}a_{0 } , \ ] ] where @xmath49 is the acceptor excitation energy [ 7 ] . in momentum space
this is equivalent to the introduction of a separable potential with constant formfactor @xmath50 @xmath51 and @xmath52 as shown in [ 7,8 ] for small values of lambda , leading to a shallow bound state , we get large absorption , while paradoxically large lambda does induce strong absorption .
the question now is : will the interaction with phonons destroy this delicate mechanism ?
a satisfying feature of our interaction is that the model is still analytically solvable .
the full interaction is now @xmath53 which gives now a set of equations in one exciton - one photon - two phonons sectors ( which are coupled ) @xmath54 again the system can be solved and we get the scattering part of the photon wave function @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 showing the effects of acceptor and phonon interactions in all its gory details .
the last line is the effect of the acceptor .
we will obtain a significant enhancement if this term is small .
as assumed above we can take @xmath58 where @xmath59 is the experimental width .
the whole behavior is therefore controlled by the integral @xmath60 for suitable values of coupling lambda real part of @xmath61 can be canceled , leading to a large enhancement , provided that the imaginary part is reasonably small .
inspection of fig . 1 , where the y axis is at the threshold for exciton production , shows indeed that large values of @xmath62 ( i.e. lambda small ! ) are favored . absorption spectra with @xmath62 small ( fig . 2 ) and @xmath62 ( fig .
3 ) show an enhancement of the order of @xmath63 .
the effect is there , but disappointingly small .
the reason lies in the large value of the imaginary part of sigma ( cf .
fig . 1 ) .
we must notice however that this is a one dimensional model . in two dimensions
we would get formally the same expressions , but all integrations are 2 dimensional .
in particular the function sigma , after angular integration would be @xmath64 and has integration measure @xmath65 , which suppresses small @xmath23 - just what is needed .
the imaginary part at threshold is now strongly reduced ( fig . 4 ) .
the absorption enhancement at small lambda now is of the order of @xmath66 ( fig .
it is seen that the fact that j aggregate is a two dimensional structure is of paramount importance .
we have shown that our postulated mechanism : exciton annihilation into 2 phonons leads to a solvable model .
it describes correctly the width of j - aggregate absorption spectra . in the case of introduced acceptors , the large absorption on shallow bound states is confirmed , but two dimensional geometry seems essential .
of course full two dimensional calculation is needed and will be presented shortly . in order to describe fluorescence spectra
, we have to include the usual energy loss by phonon radiation mechanism [ 6 ] . in conclusion
let us remark that absorption energy on shallow bound states , postulated already in [ 7 ] not only survives the introduction of realistic dissipation mechanisms , but acquires new features allowing for a better agreement with experiment .
g. scheibe , angew .
1937 , vol .
50 , p. 212
e.e jelley , nature 1937 , vol .
139 , p. 631
h. kuhn , j. photochem .
1979 , vol .
10 , p. 111
d. mbius , phys .
1978 , vol .
82 , p. 848
d. mbius and hans kuhn , j. appl .
1988 , vol .
64 , p. 5138
davydov , teorija molekuljarnych eksitonov , mockva 1968 e.a .
bartnik and k.j .
blinowska , phys .
a * 143 * , 448 ( 1982 ) .
bartnik and j.a .
tuszyski , phys .
e * 48 * , 1516 ( 1993 ) . | two dimensional arrangements oxycyanine dye hydrophobic carbon tails show narrow absorption fluorescence peaks [ 1 - 5 ] j - aggregates excitation dye molecule delocalized due to dipole - interactions between electrons dye molecules structures support loss - free energy transport over large distances molecules suitable acceptor thiocyanine instead absorb all energy at concentrations low 1:10 000 energy transport efficient when coupling acceptor weak 5 quantum mechanical mechanism developed [ 7,8 ] exciton trapping shallow state large spatial extend theory assumed ideal excitons small absorption width in j - aggregate dissipation mechanism needed explain absorption width not destroy exciton trapping long range energy transport investigation dissipation mechanisms aim paper 6 exciton - phonon coupling not mechanism destroying excitons propose new phonon - exciton interaction required properties leads to solvable model demonstrate interaction permits long range energy transfer in two dimensional structures start with one dimensional hamiltonian for excitons [ 6,7 ]@xmath0, @xmath1 creation annihilation operators excitation site n @xmath3 excitation energy single dye molecule j resonant interaction energy between adjacent sites one dimensional formalism two dimensional generalization immediate hamiltonian ( 1 ) diagonalized in momentum space bloch waves quasi momentum k @xmath4 hamiltonian ( 1 now @xmath5 dispersion relation @xmath6 scalar photons coupling dye rotating wave approximation hamiltonian exciton - photon system @xmath7 second integral energy photons dispersion relation @xmath8 last term photon - exciton interaction sum of exciton phonon numbers conserved rotating wave approximation delta momentum conservation chain molecular formfactor @xmath9 constant @xmath10 momentum dependence in loop integrals natural line width atomic state smaller than experimentally observed width wavelength visible light order 1000 corresponds to momenta @xmath11 @xmath12 light produces excitons negligible momentum bottom band model analytically solvable one photon - one exciton sector wave function ansatz @xmath13 @xmath14 fock vacuum eigenstate theoryleads to equations for unknown functions @xmath15 @xmath16 photon wavefunction @xmath16 sum of plane scattered wave @xmath19 is momentum incoming light system ( 9 ) solved observed photon wavefunction @xmath20 scattered wave cylindrical outgoing wave multiplied by scattering amplitude absorption intensity proportional to @xmath21 introduced notation @xmath22 for small @xmath23 real part of @xmath24 negligible imaginary part @xmath25 absorption probability familiar lorentzian shape @xmath26 smallness @xmath10 absorption peak finite small realistic value need dissipation mechanism interaction with phonons excitons interact with phonons j - aggregate structure not stiff phonon hamiltonian form @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 creation annihilation operators for phonons dispersion relation @xmath30 trilinear coupling exciton - phonon @xmath31 coupling change exciton number interaction push excitons to bottom band destroy excitons created negligible momentum mechanism contribute to light absorption width need interaction excitons energypossibility annihilation exciton into 2 phonons excited dye molecule contains delocalized electron reradiate light up energy to vibrations difficult for two phonons to carry away 2 - 3 ev energy effective propose interaction form @xmath32 @xmath33 formfactor assume constant interaction leads to solvable model excitons to photons phonons described by free part @xmath34 interactions @xmath35 exciton sector solved by ansatz @xmath36 coupled equations @xmath37 energy is @xmath38 scattered photon wave function written form @xmath39 function @xmath40 absorption cross section proportional to @xmath41 excitons created with zero momentum need function ( 26 ) at k=0 @xmath42 linear dispersion for phonons perform integration explicitly @xmath43 logarithm significant role obtained familiar lorentzian shape width given by @xmath44 depends on @xmath45 @xmath46 experimentally 0.026 ev estimate @xmath45 assume @xmath46 4.0 ev @xmath47 parameter absorption peak 3.104 ev excellent agreement with experimentacceptor molecule at site @xmath48 introduces additional term in exciton hamiltonian reads @xmath0-(\omega-_{0})a_{0}^{+}a_{0 } @xmath49 is acceptor excitation energy separable potential with constant formfactor @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 7,8 small values lambda shallow bound state large absorption large lambda strong absorption will interaction with phonons destroy mechanism ? model analytically solvable full interaction @xmath53 equations in one exciton - one photon - two phonons sectors @xmath54 system solved scattering part of photon wave function @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 effects acceptor phonon interactions last line effect of acceptor significant enhancement if term small @xmath58 @xmath59 experimental width behavior controlled by integral @xmath60 suitable values coupling lambda part @xmath61 can canceled large enhancement imaginary part small fig . 1 y axis threshold for exciton production large values of @xmath62 lambda small favored absorption spectra with @xmath62 small fig @xmath62show enhancement @xmath63 effect small reason in large value imaginary part sigma fig . 1 one dimensional model two dimensions same expressions integrations 2 dimensional function sigma angular integration @xmath64 integration measure @xmath65 suppresses small @xmath23 imaginary part threshold reduced fig . 4 ) absorption enhancement small lambda @xmath66 j aggregate two dimensional structure paramount importance postulated mechanism exciton annihilation 2 phonons leads solvable model describes j - aggregate absorption spectra acceptors large absorption shallow bound states confirmed two dimensional geometry essential full two dimensional calculation needed presented shortly describe fluorescence spectra include energy loss phonon radiation mechanism absorption energy shallow bound states postulated 7 survives introduction realistic dissipation mechanisms acquires new features better agreement experiment scheibe , angew . 1937 vol . 50 p. 212 jelley nature 1937 vol 139 p. 631 kuhn photochem 1979 vol 10 p. 111 mbius phys . 1978 vol 82 p. 848mbius hans kuhn appl. 1988 vol 64 p. 5138 davydov teorija eksitonov mockva 1968 bartnik blinowska phys . 143 448 1982 bartnik tuszyski . 48 1516 1993 | 0.437101 | 2,692 | 1,360 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,521 | this note proves that , for @xmath0 or @xmath1 , the bordism classes of all non - bounding grassmannian manifolds @xmath2 , with @xmath3 and having real dimension @xmath4 , constitute a linearly independent set in the unoriented bordism group @xmath5 regarded as a @xmath6-vector space .
= msam10 at 10pt [ theore]*theorem * [ theore]proposition [ theore]lemma [ theore]definition [ theore]corollary [ theore]remark [ theore]example [ theore]fact | this paper is a continuation of the ongoing study of cobordism of grassmann manifolds .
let @xmath7 denote one of the division rings @xmath8 of reals , @xmath9 of complex numbers , or @xmath1 of quaternions .
let @xmath10@xmath7 .
then the grassmannian manifold @xmath2 is defined to be the set of all @xmath11-dimensional ( left ) subspaces of @xmath12 .
@xmath2 is a closed manifold of real dimension @xmath13 . using the orthogonal complement of a subspace
one identifies @xmath2 with @xmath14 in @xcite , sankaran has proved that , for @xmath0 or @xmath15 the grassmannian manifold @xmath2 bounds if and only if @xmath16 where , given a positive integer @xmath17 , @xmath18 denotes the largest integer such that @xmath19 divides @xmath20 given a positive integer @xmath4 , let @xmath21@xmath22 denote the set of bordism classes of all non - bounding grassmannian manifolds @xmath2 having real dimension @xmath4 such that @xmath23 the restriction @xmath24 is imposed because @xmath25 and , for @xmath26 @xmath2 bounds .
thus , @xmath27 \in { \frak{n } } _ * \mid nkt = d , k < n,\ { \rm and}\ \nu(n+k ) \le \nu(k ) \ } \subset { \frak{n}}_d.$ ] the purpose of this paper is to prove the following : [ t : gd ] @xmath21@xmath22 is a linearly independent set in the @xmath28-vector space @xmath5
. similar results for dold and milnor manifolds can be found in @xcite and @xcite respectively .
the real grassmannian manifold @xmath29 is an @xmath30-dimensional closed manifold of @xmath11-planes in @xmath31 .
it is well - known ( see @xcite ) that the mod-2 cohomology of @xmath29 is given by @xmath32/ \{w.\bar{w}=1\},\ ] ] where @xmath33 and @xmath34 are the total stiefel
whitney classes of the universal @xmath11-plane bundle @xmath35 and the corresponding complementary bundle @xmath36 both over @xmath37 respectively . for computational convenience in this cohomology
one uses the flag manifold @xmath38 consisting of all ordered @xmath39-tuples @xmath40 of mutually orthogonal one - dimensional subspaces of @xmath31 with respect to the ` standard ' inner product on @xmath31 .
it is standard ( see @xcite ) that the mod-2 cohomology of @xmath38 is given by @xmath41 \bigg/ \left\ { \prod_{i=1}^{n+k } ( 1+e_i ) = 1 \right\},\ ] ] where @xmath42 are one - dimensional classes .
in fact each @xmath43 is the first stiefel whitney class of the line bundle @xmath44 over @xmath38 whose total space consists of pairs , a flag @xmath45 and a vector in @xmath46 .
there is a map @xmath47 which assigns to @xmath48 , the @xmath11-dimensional subspace @xmath49 . in the cohomology ,
@xmath50 @xmath51 is injective and is described by @xmath52 in @xcite , stong has observed , among others , the following facts : [ f : val ] the value of the class @xmath53 on the fundamental class of @xmath29 is the same as the value of @xmath54 on the fundamental class of @xmath38 . [
f : for ] in @xmath55 one has @xmath56 if @xmath57 and the set @xmath58 in particular @xmath59 for each @xmath60 , @xmath61 [ f : top ] in the top dimensional cohomology of @xmath62 a monomial @xmath63 represents the non - zero class if and only if the set @xmath64 the tangent bundle @xmath65 over @xmath29 is given ( see @xcite ) by @xmath66 in particular , the total stifel
whitney class @xmath67 of the tangent bundle over @xmath29 maps under @xmath68 to @xmath69 choosing a positive integer @xmath70 such that @xmath71 we have , using fact [ f : for ] , @xmath72 @xmath73 thus , the @xmath17th stiefel whitney class @xmath74 maps under @xmath68 to the @xmath17th elementary symmetric polynomial in @xmath43 , @xmath75 each with multiplicity @xmath76 , and @xmath77 , @xmath78 each with multiplicity@xmath79 therefore , if @xmath80 denotes the expression of the power sum @xmath81 as a polynomial in elementary symmetric polynomials @xmath82 s in @xmath83 ` unknowns ' @xmath84 , @xmath85 , we have ( see @xcite ) @xmath86 thus we have a polynomial @xmath87 of stiefel
whitney classes of @xmath29 such that @xmath88
it is shown in @xcite that @xmath89 = [ g_k({\bbb{r}}^{n+k})]^4 \quad \text{in}\ { \frak{n}}_{4nk}.\ ] ] from this , we have , in particular , @xmath90=[g_k({\bbb{r}}^{n+k})]^t \quad \text{in}\ { \frak{n}}_{nkt}.\ ] ] for this one has to simply observe that the mod-2 cohomology of the @xmath91-grassmannian is isomorphic as ring to that of the corresponding real grassmannian by an obvious isomorphism that multiplies the degree by @xmath92 .
on the other hand , since @xmath93 is a polynomial ring over the field @xmath6 , we have the following : [ r : ind]a set @xmath94,[m_2 ] , \dots , [ m_m]\}$ ] is linearly independent in @xmath5 if and only if the set @xmath94^{2^\beta},[m_2]^{2^\beta } , \dots , [ m_m]^{2^\beta}\}$ ] is linearly independent in @xmath95 , @xmath96 therefore , noting that @xmath97 , or @xmath98 , it is enough to prove theorem [ t : gd ] for real grassmannians only .
thus , from now onwards , we shall take @xmath99\ \mid \
nk = d,\ k < n,\ \text{and } \ ; { \nu}(n+k ) \leq { \nu}(k ) \}.\ ] ] if @xmath29 is an odd - dimensional real grassmannian manifold then both @xmath100 and @xmath11 must be odd , and so @xmath101 this means that @xmath29 bounds and so it follows that @xmath102 if @xmath4 is odd .
therefore we assume that @xmath4 is even .
[ l : flag ] in @xmath55 one has , for @xmath103 @xmath104 & = e_1^{k-1}e_2^{k-2 } \dots e_{k - j}^j \cdot e_{k-(j-1)}^{n+k - j}\cdot e_{k-(j-2)}^{n+k-(j-1 ) } \dots e_k^{n+k-1}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that 1 .
if @xmath105 then the exponent of @xmath43 in the product @xmath106 is greater than or equal to @xmath107 , and 2 . @xmath108 therefore , invoking fact [ f : for ] , the lemma follows.@xmath109 [ p : odd]@xmath73 let @xmath110 \in { \cal{g}}(d)\ \mid \ n+k$ ] is odd @xmath111 .
then @xmath112 is linearly independent in @xmath5 .
arrange the members of @xmath112 in descending order of the values of @xmath76 , so that @xmath113,\ [ g_{k_2}({\bbb{r}}^{n_2+k_2})],\ \dots , \ [ g_{k_s}({\bbb{r}}^{n_s+k_s})]\},\ ] ] where @xmath114 . note that @xmath115 and @xmath116 . for a @xmath4-dimensional grassmannian manifold @xmath29 ,
consider the polynomials @xmath117 @xmath73 of stiefel
whitney classes of @xmath37 where @xmath118 then , for each @xmath119 @xmath120 , we have , using , @xmath121 & = \left(\underset{1 \leq j \leq k_{\ell}}{\prod } \left(\underset{1 \leq i \leq k_{\ell}}{\sum } e_i^{n_{\ell}+k_{\ell}-(2j-1 ) } \right)\right)e_1^{k_{\ell}-1}e_2^{k_{\ell}-2 } \dots e_{k_{\ell}-1}e_{k_{\ell}+1}^{n_{\ell}-1}e_{k_{\ell}+2}^{n_{\ell}-2}\\[.2pc ] & \quad\ \dots e_{n_{\ell}+k_{\ell}-1 } \\[.2pc ] & = e_1^{n_{\ell}}e_2^{n_{\ell}+1 } \dots e_{k_{\ell}}^{n_{\ell}+k_{\ell}-1}e_{k_{\ell}+1}^{n_{\ell}-1 } e_{k_{\ell}+2}^{n_{\ell}-2 } \dots e_{n_{\ell}+k_{\ell}-1 } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] applying lemma [ l : flag ] repeatedly for successive values of @xmath107 . thus , in view of facts [ f : val ] and [ f : top ] , the stiefel
whitney number @xmath122 \rangle \ ; \ne \ ; 0\ ] ] for each @xmath123 , @xmath124 on the other hand , using , it is clear that @xmath125 \rangle \ ; = \ ; 0\ ] ] for each @xmath126 , since @xmath127 therefore , it follows that the @xmath128 matrix @xmath129 \rangle ] _ { 1 \le { \ell}\le s,\ ; 1 \le h \le s}\ ] ] is non - singular ; being lower triangular with 1 s in the diagonal .
this completes theproof.@xmath109 now we shall complete the proof of theorem [ t : gd ] using induction on @xmath4 . first note that @xmath130\ } = \{[{\bbb{r}}p^2]\},\\[.2pc ] { \cal g}(4 ) & = \{[g_1({\bbb{r}}^{4 + 1})]\ } = \{[{\bbb{r}}p^4]\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] and so both are linearly independent in @xmath131 @xmath132 respectively .
assume that the theorem holds for all dimensions less than @xmath4 .
we have @xmath133 , where @xmath134 \in { \cal g}(d ) | n+k\ \ \text{is even}\}\ ] ] and @xmath135 \in { \cal g}(d ) | n+k\ \ \text{is odd}\}.\ ] ] observe that if @xmath136 \in { \cal e}(d)$ ] then both @xmath100 and @xmath11 are even with @xmath137 on the other hand , @xmath138 \
\in \ { \cal e}(d)$ ] if @xmath139 thus , @xmath140 if and only if @xmath141 in view of proposition [ p : odd ] , we may assume without any loss that @xmath142 then , by the above observation and by theorem 2.2 of @xcite every member of @xmath143 is of the form @xmath144 ^ 4 $ ] , where @xmath144 $ ] @xmath145 @xmath146 by induction hypothesis , @xmath147 is linearly independent in @xmath148 .
so , by remark [ r : ind ] , @xmath149 again note that if @xmath136 \ ; \in \ ; { \cal e}(d),$ ] then , by ( [ e : sym ] ) , the polynomial @xmath150 @xmath151 @xmath152 .
so , for each of the polynomials @xmath153 @xmath154 considered in proposition [ p : odd ] , we have @xmath155 \rangle \ ; = \ ; 0.\ ] ] therefore , writing @xmath156 , [ g_{k_{s+2}}({\bbb{r}}^{n_{s+2}+k_{s+2}})],\dots , [ g_{k_{s+q}}({\bbb{r}}^{n_{s+q}+k_{s+q}})]\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath157 we see that the @xmath158 matrix @xmath129 \rangle ] _ { 1 \le { \ell}\le s,\ ; 1 \le h \le s+q}\ ] ] is of the form @xmath159}.\ ] ] thus , no non - trivial linear combination of members of @xmath160 can be expressed as a linear combination of the members of @xmath161 this , together with ( [ e : ind ] ) and proposition [ p : odd ] , proves that the set @xmath133 is linearly independent in @xmath5 .
hence , by induction , theorem [ t : gd ] is completely proved . using the decomposition of the members of @xmath143 , and the polynomials @xmath162 , in the lower dimensions together with the _ doubling homomorphism _ defined by milnor @xcite , one can obtain a set of polynomials of stiefel
whitney classes which yield , as in proposition [ p : odd ] , a lower triangular matrix for @xmath143 with @xmath163 s in the diagonal . thus using ( [ m : od ] )
we have a lower triangular matrix , with 1 s in the diagonal , for the whole set @xmath164
part of this work was done under a dst project | paper study cobordism grassmann manifolds @xmath7 denote division rings @xmath8 reals @xmath9 complex numbers @xmath1 quaternions @xmath10@xmath7 grassmannian manifold @xmath2 set @xmath11-dimensional subspaces @xmath12 closed manifold real dimension @xmath13 orthogonal complement subspace identifies @xmath2 @xmath14 @xcite sankaran proved @xmath0 @xmath15 grassmannian manifold @xmath2 bounds @xmath16 positive integer @xmath17 @xmath18 denotes largest integer @xmath19 divides @xmath20 positive integer @xmath4 @xmath21@xmath22 denote bordism classes non - bounding grassmannian manifolds @xmath2 real dimension @xmath4 @xmath23 restriction @xmath24 imposed @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath2 bounds @xmath27 purpose paper prove @xmath21@xmath22 linearly independent set @xmath28-vector space @xmath5 similar results dold milnor manifolds @xcite @xcitegrassmannian manifold @xmath29 is @xmath30-dimensional closed manifold of @xmath11-planes in @xmath31 mod-2 cohomology @xmath29 given by @xmath32 @xmath33 and @xmath34 are stiefel whitney classes of @xmath11-plane bundle @xmath35 and bundle @xmath36 over @xmath37 computational convenience uses flag manifold @xmath38 @xmath39-tuples @xmath40 orthogonal one - subspaces of @xmath31 mod-2 cohomology of @xmath38 by @xmath41 @xmath42 are one - classes @xmath43 is first stiefel whitney class of line bundle @xmath44 over @xmath38 total space pairs flag @xmath45 vector in @xmath46 map @xmath47 assigns to @xmath48 @xmath11-dimensional subspace @xmath49 cohomology @xmath50 @xmath51 is injective described by @xmath52 value class @xmath53 on fundamental class @xmath29 same as @xmath54 on @xmath38@xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 top dimensional cohomology @xmath62 monomial @xmath63 represents non - zero class set @xmath64 tangent bundle @xmath65 @xmath29 @xmath66 total stifel whitney class @xmath67 @xmath29 maps @xmath68 @xmath69 positive integer @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath17th stiefel whitney class @xmath74 maps @xmath68 @xmath17th elementary symmetric polynomial @xmath43 @xmath75 multiplicity @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 multiplicity@xmath79 @xmath80 power sum @xmath81 polynomial elementary symmetric polynomials @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 polynomial @xmath87 stiefel whitney classes @xmath29 @xmath88 @xmath89 = g_k({\bbb{r}}^{n+k})]^4{in}_ @xmath90=[g_k(^{n+k})]^t _}.observe mod-2 cohomology @xmath91-grassmannian isomorphic to corresponding real grassmannian multiplies degree by @xmath92 @xmath93 polynomial ring over field @xmath6 set @xmath94,[m_2 ]_m$ linearly independent in @xmath5 if @xmath94^{2^\beta},[m_2]^{2^\beta independent in @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 prove theorem for real grassmannians only take @xmath99\ nk = d, k < n,\nu}(n+k ) @xmath29 odd - real grassmannian manifold @xmath100 and @xmath11 must be odd @xmath101 @xmath29 bounds follows @xmath102 if @xmath4 odd assume @xmath4 even flag in @xmath55 @xmath103 @xmath104 & = e_1^{k-1}e_2^{k-2 } \dots e_{k - j}^j e_{k-(j-1)}^{n+k - j} e_{k-(j-2)}^{n+k-(j-1 ){n+k-1\end{aligned} 1 @xmath105 exponent @xmath43 product @xmath106 greater equal @xmath107 2 @xmath108 invoking fact lemma follows@xmath109 p : odd]@xmath73 @xmath110 odd @xmath111 @xmath112 linearly independent @xmath5 arrange members @xmath112 descending order values @xmath76 @xmath113 g_{k_2}({\bbb{r}}^{n_2+k_2})] g_{k_s}(^{n_s+k_s})] @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116@xmath4-dimensional grassmannian manifold @xmath29 consider polynomials @xmath117 @xmath73 stiefel whitney classes @xmath37 @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 @xmath121 k_{\ell}} k_{\ell}}{n_{\ell}+k_{\ell}-(2j-1{k_{\ell}-1^{k_{\ell}-2{k_{\ell}-1{k_{\ell}+1{n{\ell}-1{\ell}+2{n_{\ell}-2_{n_{\ell}+k_{\ell}-1^{n_{\ell}}e_2^{n_{\ell}+1{k_{\ell}}+k_{\ell}-1{k{\ell}+1{n_{\ell}-1{k_{\ell}+2}^{n_{\ell}-2_{n_{\ell}+k_{\ell}-1{aligned applying lemma flag successive values @xmath107facts f : val f : top ] stiefel whitney number @xmath122 \rangle 0\ @xmath123 @xmath124 @xmath125 \rangle 0\ @xmath126 @xmath127 @xmath128 matrix @xmath129 \rangle 1 non - singular lower triangular 1 s diagonal completes theproof.@xmath109 proof theorem [ t : gd ] induction @xmath4 @xmath130 = {[{\bbb{r}}p^2]}.2pc \cal g}(4 ) \{[g_1({\bbb{r}}^{4 + 1})] ={[{\bbb{r}}p^4]{aligned} linearly independent @xmath131 @xmath132 theorem holds all dimensions less @xmath4 @xmath133 @xmath134 \cal g}(d ) | n+k\ even} @xmath135 \cal g}(d ) | n+k\{is odd}@xmath136 \in { \cal e}(d)$ ] @xmath100 @xmath11 even with @xmath137 @xmath138 \in { \cal e}(d)$ ] @xmath139 @xmath140 @xmath141 odd assume @xmath142 theorem 2.2 @xcite member @xmath143 form @xmath144 ^ 4 $ ] @xmath144 $ @xmath145 @xmath146 @xmath147 independent in @xmath148 remark @xmath149 @xmath136 \ \in { \cal e}(d),$ ] polynomial @xmath150 @xmath151 @xmath152 polynomials @xmath153 @xmath154 proposition p : odd @xmath155 \rangle \ ; = \ ; 0.\ @xmath156 [ g_{k_{s+2}}({^{n_{s+2}+k_{s+2}})_{k_{s+q}}(^{n_{s+q}+k_{s+q}}{aligned @xmath157 @xmath158 matrix @xmath129 \rangle 1 s s+q form @xmath159}.no - linear combination @xmath160 expressed as linear @xmath161 proposition [ p : odd ] proves set @xmath133 linearly independent in @xmath5 theorem [ t : gd ] proved decomposition of @xmath143 polynomials @xmath162 lower dimensions doubling homomorphism defined by milnor @xcite polynomials stiefel whitney classes : lower triangular matrix for @xmath143 with @xmath163 s in diagonal using ( [ m : od ] lower triangular matrix 1 s in diagonal for whole set @xmath164 work under dst project | 0.554924 | 3,358 | 1,906 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,524 | for the plane symmetry we have found the electro - vacuum exact solutions of the einstein - maxwell equations and we have shown that one of them is equivalent to the mcvittie solution of a charged infinite thin plane .
the analytical extension has been accomplished and the penrose conformal diagram has been obtained as well . | symmetries and killing vectors play an important role in exact solutions , especially in the electro vacuum ones e.g. @xcite .
a general plane symmetric metrics in cylindrical coordinates is taken as a seed solution @xmath0 where @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 are arbitrary functions of coordinates @xmath4 and @xmath5 . the generating conjecture , formulated in @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , is applied to azimuthal @xmath6 killing vector belonging to rotation in planes of symmetry .
components of this killing vector are @xmath7 expected form of `` charged '' metrics is again the general plane symmetric metrics @xmath8 where @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 are functions different from ( [ seed ] ) and they will be evaluated out of the einstein - maxwell equations . according to the conjecture we can form an electro - magnetic potential from killing vector @xmath12
if we use the electro - magnetic potential ( [ pot ] ) for purely electro - magnetic energy - momentum tensor , two einstein equations @xmath13 and @xmath14 for the space - time ( [ newm ] ) are @xmath15 these lead to the restrictions on function @xmath2 in seed metric ( [ sedm ] ) @xmath16 then the maxwell equations for ( [ newm ] ) are automatically satisfied , the nonzero covariant and contravariant components of the maxwell electro - magnetic tensor are @xmath17 there are other four non - trivial einstein equations @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 with unknown functions @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 to be solved @xmath22 where subscript denotes partial derivation .
now we are trying to solve these equations with the assumption that @xmath10 is a function of coordinate @xmath5 only . consequently equations ( [ einst2 ] ) and ( [ einst4 ] )
lead to independence of functions @xmath9 and @xmath11 on coordinate @xmath4 . therefore all unknown functions @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 now depend on coordinate @xmath5 only .
we should solve two einstein equations @xmath18 ( [ einst1 ] ) and @xmath21 ( [ einst4 ] ) @xmath26 from ( [ einst02 ] ) we evaluate @xmath27 which is subsequently put into ( [ einst01 ] ) then we get only one equation for two unknown functions @xmath28 and @xmath29
@xmath30 we can choose one arbitrary function @xmath31 , let us choose it in the form @xmath32 we obtain the functions @xmath28 and @xmath29 @xmath33 where @xmath34 and @xmath35 are integration constants .
next , the new metrics components for the solution ( [ newm ] ) can be computed @xmath36 where @xmath31 is an arbitrary function and @xmath34 and @xmath35 are arbitrary constants .
the metric tensor must satisfy hilbert conditions which lead to inequalities @xmath37 now we are looking at simplifying resulting metrics tensor using constants substitutions and coordinate transformations @xmath38 where striped coordinates denote the new ones .
the transformation ( [ transf ] ) is formally equivalent to the choice of function @xmath31 as @xmath39 thus , from the metric tensor we have removed the arbitrary function @xmath31 which can be interpreted as an arbitrary transformation in coordinate @xmath5 .
the resulting form of the metric tensor is @xmath40 where we have abandoned the strips and the hilbert conditions give @xmath41 moreover , we can look for solutions beyond hilbert conditions .
they can be gained from einstein equations ( [ einst1 ] ) , ( [ einst2 ] ) , ( [ einst3 ] ) and ( [ einst4 ] ) with the assumption that @xmath10 is function only of coordinate @xmath4
. then equations ( [ einst1 ] ) and ( [ einst2 ] ) lead to independence of functions @xmath9 and @xmath11 on coordinate @xmath5 . so all unknown functions @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath44 depend only on coordinate @xmath4 now .
the resulting metric tensor has the form @xmath45 corresponding hilbert conditions for this solution are @xmath46 the solution ( [ solution2 ] ) can be obtained directly from the solution ( [ solution ] ) exchanging coordinates @xmath4 and @xmath5 .
let us explore some properties of the solutions ( [ solution ] ) and ( [ solution2 ] ) now .
metrics ( [ solution ] ) is singular at @xmath47 .
singularities at @xmath48 are only coordinate ones , there exist horizons . on the other hand
, @xmath49 is a real physical singularity , and scalar invariants of the riemann tensor diverge here as shown @xmath50 the electro - magnetic potential in solution ( [ solution ] ) is @xmath51 the components of maxwell electro - magnetic tensor are @xmath52 we can write down three usual dimensional components of the maxwell tensor as @xmath53 , \\ \vec{b}&=&\left[0,0,-k\left(\frac{k+z}{z}\right)^2\right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this solution there exists only a magnetic field . the magnetic field @xmath54 is shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( where @xmath55 ) .
it is also possible to evaluate geodesic trajectories of motion when testing particles are fixed in @xmath4,@xmath5 plane .
the null geodesic lines are given explicitly by @xmath56 where @xmath57 is an integration constant .
such geodesic lines are shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] .
the motion of the charged test particles in the @xmath4,@xmath5 plane is given by @xmath58 the dots denote differentiation with respect to an affinne parameter .
it is clear that the central singular plane acts as a source of repulsive power .
let us consider a static plane - symmetric solution as appears in @xcite ( with null cosmological constant ) @xmath59 where @xmath60 is an arbitrary function of coordinate @xmath5 , a prime denotes differentiation with respect to @xmath5 , @xmath61 and @xmath62 are constants and @xmath63 is the charge per unit area .
when we use the transformations @xmath64 or analogous ones @xmath65 our solution ( [ gsol1 ] ) - ( [ gsol4 ] ) turns to be identical with the mcvittie ( [ solutiong ] ) with @xmath66 .
the mcvittie solution @xcite is thus generated by the killing @xmath67 vector from the seed metric ( [ sedm ] ) .
let us connect both ( [ solution ] ) and ( [ solution2 ] ) solutions together through the horizons @xmath68 .
we will use retarded and advanced null geodesic coordinates @xmath69 and @xmath70 like this @xmath71 after transformation of the metric tensor from the cartesian coordinate couple @xmath5 , @xmath4 to the null one @xmath69 , @xmath70 we get @xmath72 exponential transformation is used here ( which doubles the regions as in kruskal analytical extension of schwarzchild solution @xcite and leaves the coordinates null ) @xmath73 now again , we diagonalize the metric by using the new cartesian coordinate couple @xmath74 , @xmath75
@xmath76 this leads to the metrics tensor @xmath77 where @xmath5 , which is @xmath5 in ( [ solution ] ) for @xmath78 and @xmath4 in ( [ solution2 ] ) for @xmath79 , is given implicitly by the equation @xmath80 at first sight there are no sign changes between @xmath81 and @xmath82 , the hilbert conditions are always satisfied for all values of @xmath74 , @xmath75 .
the resulting space - time contains every original region i : @xmath78 , ii : @xmath83 , and iii : @xmath84 twice as shown in fig .
furthermore , in ( [ kruskal ] ) there are still singularities at @xmath85 but no more at @xmath86 .
lines with constant @xmath5 form over @xmath75 , @xmath74 plane a hyperbolic paraboloid and lines with constant @xmath4 form lines @xmath87 as shown in fig .
singular points @xmath88 are represented by values @xmath89 of @xmath90 , the apparent singularity @xmath86 is moved to infinity in these coordinates .
null geodesic lines in @xmath91 are straight lines @xmath92 as displayed by dashed lines in fig .
[ fig5 ] .
the transformation to the penrose conformal diagram is done by these transformations ( again leave null coordinates ) @xmath93 new null coordinates @xmath94 are limited by @xmath95 so the infinity has been conformaly moved to finite distance .
now it is possible to draw the penrose diagram ( fig .
[ fig6 ] ) . here
are marked geodesic future and past @xmath96 , null future and past @xmath97 and the time - like infinity @xmath98 .
for the physical singularity @xmath99 is @xmath100 and both are time - like , so it is possible for an observer to avoid falling in it .
we have found two electro - vacuum plane symmetric exact solutions of the einstein - maxwell equations using the generating conjecture and the killing vector @xmath67 of the plane symmetric vacuum seed metric .
we have shown that one of them is equivalent to the mcvittie solution of a charged infinite thin plane .
we also carried out analytical extension of coordinates , which can cover both found solutions with only one coordinate chart .
the corresponding penrose conformal diagram has been obtained as well .
99 bik j. , pravdov a. , symmetries of asymptotically flat electrovacuum spacetimes and radiation , j. mathem .
39 , 6011 ( 1998 ) horsk j. , mitskievich n. v. : czech j. phys .
b 39 ( 1989 ) , page 957 cataldo m. , horsk j. , mitskievich n. v. : killing vectors and einstein - maxwell field , differential geometry and its applications , proc . conf . brno ( 1989 ) novotn j. , horsk j. : generation method for solutions of einstein - maxwell equations and its applications , proc .
opava ( 1992 ) amundsen p. a. , grn .
: physical review d , vol .
27 , num . 8
( 1983 ) , page 1731 mcvittie g. c.:proc .
london 124 , 366 ( 1929 ) hawking s. w. , ellis g. f. r. : the large scale structure of space - time , cambridge university press ( 1973 ) | symmetries killing vectors in exact solutions especially electro vacuum ones @xcite general plane symmetric metrics cylindrical coordinates seed solution @xmath0 @xmath1 arbitrary functions of coordinates generating conjecture @xcite applied to @xmath6 killing vector rotation planes symmetry components are @xmath7 charged metrics general plane symmetric metrics @xmath8 @xmath9 functions different from seed evaluated einstein - maxwell equations form electro - magnetic potential from killing vector @xmath12 electro - magnetic energy - momentum tensor einstein equations @xmath13 for space - time newm @xmath15 to restrictions on function @xmath2 in seed metric @xmath16 maxwell equations for newm satisfied nonzero covariant contravariant components of maxwell electro - magnetic tensor are @xmath17 four non - trivial einstein equations @xmath18 with unknown functions @xmath9 solved @xmath22 subscript partial derivation solve equations assumption @xmath10 function of coordinate @xmath5equations einst2 lead to independence functions @xmath9 on coordinate @xmath4 unknown functions @xmath23 depend on coordinate @xmath5 solve two einstein equations @xmath18 @xmath21 @xmath26 evaluate @xmath27 put into einst01 one equation for unknown functions @xmath28 @xmath30 choose one arbitrary function @xmath31 @xmath32 obtain functions @xmath28 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 are integration constants new metrics components for solution computed @xmath36 @xmath31 arbitrary function arbitrary constants metric tensor satisfy hilbert conditions lead to inequalities @xmath37 metrics tensor using constants substitutions coordinate transformations @xmath38 striped coordinates denote new ones transformation transf equivalent to choice function @xmath31 @xmath39 removed arbitrary function @xmath31 arbitrary transformation in coordinate @xmath5 resulting form metric tensor is @xmath40 abandoned strips hilbert conditions @xmath41 look for solutions beyond hilbert conditionsgained from einstein equations assumption @xmath10 function of coordinate @xmath4 equations lead to independence of functions @xmath9 @xmath11 on coordinate @xmath5 unknown functions @xmath42 @xmath44 depend on coordinate @xmath4 resulting metric tensor has form @xmath45 hilbert conditions are @xmath46 solution solution2 obtained from solution exchanging coordinates @xmath4 and @xmath5 explore properties of solutions singular at @xmath47 singularities at @xmath48 coordinate ones horizons @xmath49 real physical singularity scalar invariants of riemann tensor diverge @xmath50 electro - magnetic potential in solution is @xmath51 components of maxwell electro - magnetic tensor are @xmath52 write down three usual dimensional components of maxwell tensor as @xmath53 in solution exists only magnetic field magnetic field @xmath54 shown in fig possible to evaluate geodesic trajectories of motion when testing particles fixed in @xmath4,@xmath5 plane null geodesic lines given by @xmath56 @xmath57 is integration constantgeodesic lines shown in fig . motion of charged test particles in @xmath4 plane given by @xmath58 dots denote differentiation affinne parameter central plane source repulsive power consider static plane - symmetric solution in @xcite null cosmological constant ) @xmath59 @xmath60 arbitrary function of coordinate @xmath5 prime differentiation constants @xmath63 charge per unit area transformations @xmath64 @xmath65 solution ( gsol1 - gsol4 ] identical with mcvittie @xmath66 mcvittie solution @xcite generated by @xmath67 vector from seed metric connect solution ] solution2 solutions through horizons @xmath68use retarded advanced null geodesic coordinates @xmath69 @xmath71 transformation metric tensor from @xmath5 to null one @xmath72 exponential transformation doubles regions leaves coordinates null @xmath73 diagonalize metric new cartesian coordinate couple @xmath74 @xmath75 leads to metrics tensor @xmath77 @xmath5 @xmath78 @xmath4 @xmath79 given by equation @xmath80 no sign changes between @xmath81 @xmath82 hilbert conditions satisfied for values @xmath74 @xmath75 resulting space - time contains original region @xmath78 @xmath83 @xmath84 singularities at @xmath85 no more at @xmath86 lines with constant @xmath5 form @xmath75 hyperbolic paraboloid lines constant @xmath4 form lines @xmath87 singular points @xmath88 represented by values @xmath89 @xmath90 apparent singularity @xmath86 moved to infinity null geodesic lines @xmath91 straight lines @xmath92 dashed lines fig transformation to penrose diagram transformations leave null coordinates @xmath93 coordinates @xmath94 limited by @xmath95 infinity moved to finite distance possible to draw penrose diagram ( fig marked geodesic future past @xmath96 null future @xmath97 time - like infinity @xmath98 physical singularity @xmath99 @xmath100 both time - like avoid falling found two electro - vacuum plane symmetric solutions of einstein - maxwell equations using generating conjecture killing vector @xmath67 one equivalent to mcvittie solution of charged infinite thin plane carried analytical extension of coordinates solutions penrose conformal diagram obtained bik j. pravdov a. symmetries of flat electrovacuum spacetimes radiation j mathem . 39 6011 ( 1998 ) horsk mitskievich czech j phys . 39 1989 page 957 killing vectors einstein - maxwell field differential geometry applications 1989 novotn generation method for solutions einstein - maxwell equations physical review 27 8 1983 page 1731 mcvittie glondon 124 366 1929 hawking ellis large structure space time cambridge university press 1973 | 0.425553 | 2,438 | 1,246 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,525 | we investigate the scalar - torsion mode in a cosmological model of the poincar gauge theory of gravity . we treat the geometric effect of torsion as an effective quantity , which behaves like dark energy , and study the effective equation of state ( eos ) of the model .
we concentrate on two cases with the constant curvature solution and positive kinetic energy , respectively . in the former , we find that the torsion eos has different values in the various stages of the universe
. in particular , it behaves like the radiation ( matter ) eos of @xmath0 ( @xmath1 ) in the radiation ( matter ) dominant epoch , while in the late time the torsion density is supportive for the accelerating universe . in the latter
, our numerical analysis shows that in general the eos has an asymptotic behavior in the high redshift regime , while it could cross the phantom divide line in the low redshift regime . | recent cosmological observations @xcite have demonstrated that our universe is undergoing the phase of an accelerating expansion .
although general relativity ( gr ) developed in the last century has been successful in many ways of explaining various experimental results in gravity , the nature of the accelerating universe now rises as a small cloud shrouding it .
we thereby look for a more general theory that comprises gr yet able to solve the accelerating problem referred to as dark energy @xcite . by virtue of the local gauge principle ,
one leads to incorporate poincar group as gauge group of a principal bundle , such that the local lorentz symmetry of the spacetime is preserved @xcite .
an attempt is to release torsion from a connection , rather than the levi - civita connection in the standard gr , which also acts as a dynamical field like metric tensor .
such spacetime is usually called riemann - cartan manifold . the gauge theory based on this manifold ,
is known as poincar gauge theory ( pgt ) @xcite
. it has been investigated in @xcite that there are six modes by the decomposition of the connection according to torsion tensor in the linearlized theory , classified as @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 in terms of spins and parities . among them , the @xmath5 mode @xcite , also called the _ scalar - torsion _ mode , does not directly interact with any known fundamental source @xcite .
along with the property induced by the nonlinear equation set , this @xmath5 mode is our main concern . in @xcite ,
shie , nester and yo ( sny ) have examined models with the spin @xmath5 mode in pgt to achieve the late time accelerating expansion of the universe . in other words , the geometric effect of torsion
is treated as an effective dark energy . in particular , they have presented two cases with the solutions of a constant curvature and positive kinetic energy , respectively .
the first case is an extremely simple solution existing inside the system of differential equations formed by the spin @xmath5 mode , which provides a modeling for the late time de sitter universe for dark energy .
note that this simple solution violates the positivity argument @xcite .
the second one is referred to as the normal case , which conforms with the regular positivity condition , but it gives rise to no obvious analytic solution .
torsion cosmology related to the scalar - torsion mode has been also explored in @xcite . in this work ,
we concentrate on these two cases and present numerical solutions of the late - time acceleration behavior corresponding to the equation of state ( eos ) , defined by @xmath6 , where @xmath7 and @xmath8 are the energy density and pressure of the relevant component of the universe , respectively .
this paper is organized as follows : in sec .
ii , we review the scalar - torsion of the spin @xmath5 mode in pgt and give equations of motion for cosmology . in sec .
iii , we show our numerical results on the cosmological evolutions for the scalar - torsion mode .
we present our conclusions in sec . iv .
pgt of gravity starts with a lagrangian 4-form on @xmath9-spacetime : @xmath10 where @xmath11 is a set of the orthonormal dual basis , @xmath12 is the connection 1-form with respect to @xmath11 , @xmath13 is the matter lagrangian , and @xmath14 is the gravitational lagrangian that can be made up by certain combinations . in @xcite , sny studied the spin @xmath5 mode , given by @xcite @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the hodge dual map , @xmath17 is the volume 4-form of the space - time and @xmath18 with @xmath19 are the irreducible pieces of the torsion 2-form @xmath20 , defined by @xcite @xmath21 the coefficients of @xmath14 in ( [ e : sny ] ) are constrained by the positivity argument @xcite such that @xmath22 the independent variation of ( [ e : lagrangian ] ) with respect to @xmath23 yields @xcite @xmath24 where the gauge field momenta are given by @xmath25 and the source terms are defined by @xmath26 corresponding to the symmetric energy - momentum tensor - valued 4-form , asymmetric vector - valued 3-form usually called canonical energy - momentum tensor , and tensor - valued 3-form known as canonical spin angular momentum tensor , respectively
. one can also write the decompositions into the basis of @xmath27 @xcite : @xmath28 where @xmath29 .
the equations of motion are given symbolically as @xmath30 we shall describe our universe with the flrw cosmology , which is homogeneous and isotropic with the metric @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the constant curvature . for simplicity , we shall only consider the flat universe with @xmath33 . for ( [ e : sny ] ) of the sny model in the frlw cosmology with no spin source @xmath34 ,
the main field equation ( [ e : eom ] ) leads to @xcite @xmath35 where @xmath36 , @xmath37 , and @xmath38 , which is the time component of the torsion trace , defined by @xmath39 . here ,
@xmath40 in ( [ e : main eq1])-([e : main eq3 ] ) denotes the affine curvature with respect to the curvature 2-form @xmath41 , given by @xmath42 hence , one obtains the relation @xmath43 where @xmath44 represents the curvature of the levi - civita connection induced by ( [ e : frw ] ) .
the energy - momentum tensor @xmath45 is defined as ( [ e : canonical em tensor ] ) and @xmath46 stands for the trace @xmath47 .
explicitly , one has @xmath48 with the subscript @xmath49 representing the ordinary matter including both dust and radiation . to see the geometric effect of torsion , we can write down the friedmann equations as @xmath50 with @xmath51 in gr , where @xmath52 and @xmath53 denote the critical energy density and total pressure of the universe , while @xmath54 and @xmath55 correspond to the energy density and pressure of some effective field , respectively . by comparing the equation of motion of the scalar - torsion mode in pgt ( [ e : rho_t ] ) to the friedmann equations ( [ e : friedmanneq ] ) ,
one obtains @xmath56 which will be regarded as the effective torsion dark energy density and pressure , respectively . from ( [ e : friedmanneq ] ) , we get the continuity equation , @xmath57 which can also be derived by applying the identity @xmath58 where @xmath59 is the covariant derivative with respect to the levi - civita connection and @xmath60 is the effective energy - momentum tensor of torsion dark energy . in addition , from ( [ e : main eq1 ] ) - ( [ e : main eq3 ] ) , one can check that the continuity equation for the torsion field is also valid , @xmath61 @xmath62 consequently , we obtain the continuity equation for the ordinary matter to be @xmath63 by assuming no coupling between radiation and dust , the matter densities of radiation ( @xmath0 ) and dust ( @xmath64 ) in scalar - torsion cosmology share the same evolution behaviors as gr , @xmath61 @xmath65 and @xmath66 , respectively . in order to investigate the cosmological evolution ,
it is natural to define the total eos by @xcite @xmath67 which leads to @xmath68 where @xmath69 and @xmath70 with @xmath71 , representing the energy density ratios and eoss of matter and torsion , respectively .
note that the eos in ( [ e : w_t ] ) , which is commonly used in the literature , e.g. @xcite , can be examined by cosmological observations in @xcite .
in particular , it can be used to distinguish the modified gravity theories from @xmath72cdm @xcite .
consequently , the evolution of the torsion dark energy can be described in terms of solely @xmath73 by @xmath74 in the following section , we shall focus on this important quantity .
the evolution of torsion cosmology is determined by ( [ e : main eq1 ] ) - ( [ e : main eq3 ] ) . in general
, one needs to solve the dynamics of @xmath40 , @xmath75 and @xmath76 by the system of ordinary differential equations .
however , one easily sees that in ( [ e : main eq3 ] ) there exists a special case , in which the constant scalar affine curvature @xmath77 is a possible solution @xcite . recall that in order to conform with the positive kinetic energy argument , the condition ( [ e : condition ] ) is needed .
however , since the special case yields the negative curvature @xmath78 with a negative matter density @xmath79 , the condition of @xmath80 is required @xcite . in this section ,
we concentrate on the eos of the scalar - torsion mode in both special and normal cases .
we also present the cosmological evolution of the density ratio , defined by @xmath81 , from a high redshift to the current stage . in this special case
, we take the assumptions of @xmath83 and @xmath84 in @xcite .
the evolution equations ( [ e : main eq1 ] ) - ( [ e : main eq3 ] ) reduce to @xmath85 for the numerical calculation , we rescale the parameters as follows : @xmath86 where @xmath87 is the matter density at @xmath88 and the scalar affine curvature is a constant @xmath89 . from ( [ eq : sc01 ] ) , ( [ eq : sc02 ] ) and ( [ eq : sc03 ] ) , we obtain the following dimensionless equations , @xmath90 where the prime @xmath91 stands for @xmath92 and @xmath93 . using ( [ e : conservation_rho_t ] ) , ( [ e : w_t ] ) and ( [ eq : scrhot ] ) , we find that @xmath94 [ cols= " < , < " , ] in fig .
[ fg:2]a , we show the evolution of the density ratio , @xmath95 , as a function of the redshift @xmath96 .
the figure demonstrates that the torsion density @xmath54 dominates the universe in the high redshift regime ( @xmath97 ) with the general parameter and initial condition selection , while the matter - dominated regime is reached only within a very short time interval . in fig .
[ fg:2]b , we show that @xmath73 has an asymptotic behavior at the high redshift regime , @xmath61 @xmath98 . moreover ,
in the low redshift regime , it may even have a phantom crossing behavior , @xmath61 , the torsion eos could cross the phantom divide line of @xmath99 . as a result ,
the scalar - torsion mode is able to account for the late - time accelerating universe . finally , we remark that the studies in refs .
@xcite only indicated an oscillating behavior without the asymptotic one above for the torsion density .
we have studied the torsion eos of the two cases of the scalar - torsion mode in pgt of gravity , which are suitable for explaining the late - time accelerating universe but each of them possesses a quite different cosmological behavior in the high redshift regime . for the first case , which violates the positive kinetic energy and
has a constant affine curvature @xmath40 , the torsion eos has asymptotic behaviors : @xmath100 in the radiation - dominated stage , @xmath101 in the matter - dominated stage , and finally a late - time de - sitter solution corresponding to @xmath99 .
the torsion density ratio of @xmath102 in the high redshift regime is a `` negative '' constant . for the second one , which has the positive kinetic energy , under the general selection of parameters and initial conditions
, the torsion eos still shows an asymptotic behavior , @xmath103 , in the high redshift regime , while it could cross the phantom divide line in the low redshift regime . the most confusing phenomenon in this spin
@xmath5 scalar - torsion cosmology is that the universe is dominated by torsion in the high redshift regime even though there exists a narrow window for the matter - dominated epoch .
we are grateful to professor h. j. yo and professor j. m. nester for the inspiring and helpful discussions .
this work was partially supported by national center of theoretical science , national tsing hua university and national science council ( nsc-98 - 2112-m-007 - 008-my3 ) of r.o.c .
a. g. riess _ et al .
_ [ supernova search team collaboration ] , astron .
j. * 116 * , 1009 ( 1998 ) . s. perlmutter _ et al .
_ [ supernova cosmology project collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. * 517 * , 565 ( 1999 ) .
d. n. spergel _ et al . _
[ wmap collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. suppl .
* 148 * , 175 ( 2003 ) .
m. tegmark _ et al . _
[ sdss collaboration ] , phys .
* d69 * , 103501 ( 2004 ) .
s. w. allen , r. w. schmidt , h. ebeling , a. c. fabian , l. van speybroeck , mon . not .
soc . * 353 * , 457 ( 2004 ) .
e. j. copeland , m. sami and s. tsujikawa , int .
j. mod .
d * 15 * , 1753 ( 2006 ) ; m. li , x. -d .
li , s. wang and y. wang , commun .
* 56 * , 525 ( 2011 ) .
f. w. hehl , `` four lectures on poincare gauge field theory , '' in proc . of the 6th course of the school of cosmology and gravitation on spin , torsion , rotation , and supergravity , held at erice , italy , 1979 ( p. g. bergmann and v. de sabbata , eds . ) , p. 5 .
plenum , 1980 .
k. hayashi and t. shirafuji , prog .
* 64 * , 866 ( 1980 ) ; * 64 * , 883 ( 1980 ) ; * 64 * , 1435 ( 1980 ) ; * 64 * , 2222 ( 1980 ) ; * 65 * , 525 ( 1981 ) ; * 66 * , 318 ( 1981 ) ; * 66 * , 2258 ( 1981 ) . | cosmological observations @xcite demonstrated universe undergoing accelerating expansion general relativity ( gr ) successful explaining experimental results gravity accelerating universe rises as small cloud look for general theory gr solve accelerating problem dark energy local gauge principle incorporate poincar group as gauge group principal bundle local lorentz symmetry spacetime preserved attempt release torsion from connection levi - civita connection standard gr acts as dynamical field like tensor spacetime called riemann - cartan manifold gauge theory known as poincar gauge theory ( pgt ) @xcite investigated six modes by decomposition connection according to torsion tensor in theory as @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 mode scalar - torsion _ mode directly interact with fundamental source nonlinear equation set mode main concern shie , nester yo sny examined models with spin @xmath5 mode late time accelerating expansion universe geometric effect of torsion treated as effective dark energy presented two cases with solutions of constant curvature positive kinetic energyfirst case simple solution differential equations spin @xmath5 mode modeling late time universe dark energy solution violates positivity argument @xcite second normal case conforms regular positivity condition no analytic solution torsion cosmology scalar - torsion mode explored in @xcite work concentrate on two cases present numerical solutions late - time acceleration behavior equation of state ( eos ) defined by @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 energy density pressure relevant universe paper organized review scalar - torsion spin @xmath5 mode equations of motion for cosmology show numerical results cosmological evolutions scalar - torsion mode present conclusions iv gravity starts with lagrangian 4-form on @xmath9-spacetime @xmath10 @xmath11 orthonormal dual basis @xmath12 connection 1-form @xmath11 @xmath13 matter lagrangian @xmath14 gravitational lagrangian combinations@xcite sny studied spin @xmath5 mode @xmath15 @xmath16 hodge dual map @xmath17 volume 4-form space - time @xmath18 @xmath19 torsion 2-form @xmath20 defined @xcite coefficients @xmath14 constrained by positivity argument @xmath22 independent variation lagrangian @xmath23 yields @xcite @xmath24 gauge field momenta @xmath25 source terms @xmath26 symmetric energy - momentum tensor - valued 4-form asymmetric vector - valued 3-form canonical energy - momentum tensor spin angular momentum tensor decompositions basis @xmath27 @xmath28 equations motion symbolically @xmath30 universe with flrw cosmology homogeneous isotropic metric @xmath31 @xmath32 constant curvature consider flat universe with @xmath33 sny model frlw cosmology no spin source @xmath34 main field equation eom leads to @xcite @xmath35 @xmath36 time component torsion trace defined by @xmath39@xmath40 eq1] eq3 denotes affine curvature curvature 2-form @xmath41 by @xmath42 obtains relation @xmath43 @xmath44 represents curvature levi - civita connection induced by e : frw ] ) energy - momentum tensor @xmath45 canonical em tensor ] @xmath46 trace @xmath47 @xmath48 subscript @xmath49 ordinary matter dust radiation geometric effect torsion friedmann equations as @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 denote critical energy density total pressure universe @xmath54 @xmath55 energy density pressure effective field comparing equation of motion scalar - torsion mode pgt rho_t friedmann equations obtains @xmath56 effective torsion dark energy density pressure continuity equation @xmath57 derived identity @xmath58 @xmath59 covariant derivative levi - civita connection @xmath60 effective energy - momentum tensor torsion dark energyfrom eq1 - eq3 check continuity equation torsion field valid @xmath61 @xmath62 obtain continuity equation ordinary matter @xmath63 no coupling between radiation dust matter densities of radiation @xmath0 dust @xmath64 ) in scalar - torsion cosmology share evolution behaviors as @xmath61 @xmath65 @xmath66 define total eos by @xcite @xmath67 leads to @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 energy density ratios eoss of matter torsion eos in ( [ e : w_t ] ) examined by cosmological observations distinguish modified gravity theories from @xmath72cdm @xcite evolution torsion dark energy described @xmath73 by @xmath74 focus evolution torsion cosmology determined by e : main eq1 ] - eq3 ] ) solve dynamics of @xmath40 @xmath75 @xmath76 by ordinary differential equations ( e : main eq3 ] ) special case constant scalar affine curvature @xmath77 possible solution @xcite positive kinetic energy argument condition ( [ e : ] ) needed special case yields negative curvature @xmath78 negative matter density @xmath79 condition @xmath80 required @xcite concentrate on scalar - torsion mode in special and normal cases present cosmological evolution of density ratio defined by @xmath81 from high redshift to current stage special case assumptions of @xmath83 and @xmath84 in @xcite evolution equations eq1 - eq3 reduce to @xmath85 rescale parameters @xmath86 @xmath87 is matter density at @xmath88 scalar affine curvature constant @xmath89 from sc01 obtain dimensionless equations , @xmath90 prime @xmath91 stands for @xmath92 and @xmath93 using conservation_rho_t_t eq scrhot find @xmath94 fig . [ fg:2]a evolution of density ratio @xmath95 function of redshift @xmath96 torsion density @xmath54 dominates universe in high redshift regime ( @xmath97 ) matter - dominated regime reached short time interval fig .@xmath73 asymptotic behavior high redshift regime @xmath61 @xmath98 low redshift regime phantom crossing behavior torsion eos cross phantom divide line @xmath99 scalar - torsion mode late - time accelerating universe studies @xcite indicated oscillating behavior without asymptotic torsion density studied torsion eos two cases scalar - torsion mode gravity late - time accelerating universe different cosmological behavior high redshift regime first case violates positive kinetic energy constant affine curvature @xmath40 torsion eos asymptotic behaviors @xmath100 radiation - @xmath101 matter - dominated late - time de - sitter solution @xmath99 torsion density ratio @xmath102 high redshift regime negative constant second one positive kinetic energy torsion eos asymptotic behavior @xmath103 high redshift regime could cross phantom divide line low redshift regime confusing universe dominated by torsion in high redshift regime narrow window for matter - dominated epoch grateful to professor h. j. yo professor j. m. nester for discussionswork supported by national center theoretical science national tsing hua university science council nsc-98 - 2112-m-007 - 008-my3 riess supernova search team collaboration astron . j. 116 * , 1009 ( 1998 ) perlmutter supernova cosmology project collaboration astrophys . j 517, 565 ( 1999 ) spergel wmap collaboration astrophys 148 , 175 ( 2003 ) tegmark sdss collaboration . d69, 103501 ( 2004 ). allen schmidt ebeling fabian van speybroeck * , 457 ( 2004 ) copeland sami tsujikawa int . j. mod 15 *, 1753 ( 2006 ) wang y wang 56 * , 525 ( 2011 ) w. hehl four lectures poincare gauge field theory 6th course school cosmology gravitation spin torsion rotation supergravity erice italy 1979 bergmann de sabbata eds p. 5 plenum 1980. hayashi. shirafuji64 * 1980 883 ( 1980 ) 1435 1980 2222 ( 1980 ) 65 525 ( 1981 ) 66 318 ( 1981 ) 2258 ( 1981 ) | 0.564477 | 3,356 | 1,729 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,536 | the purpose of this paper is to exhibit a quantum network phenomenon the anti - core that goes against the classical network concept of congestion core .
classical networks idealized as infinite , gromov hyperbolic spaces with least - cost path routing ( and subject to a technical condition on the gromov boundary ) have a congestion core , defined as a subnetwork that routing paths have a high probability of visiting . here
, we consider quantum networks , more specifically spin chains , define the so - called maximum excitation transfer probability @xmath0 between spin @xmath1 and spin @xmath2 , and show that the central spin has among all other spins the lowest probability of being excited or transmitting its excitation .
the anti - core is singled out by analytical formulas for @xmath3 , revealing the number theoretic properties of quantum chains . by engineering the chain ,
we further show that this probability can be made vanishingly small . | probably the most significant result of the gromov analysis of classical networks @xcite is existence of a congestion core . under a network protocol that sends the packets along least cost paths
, the _ core _ can be qualitatively defined as a point where most of the geodesics ( least cost paths ) converge , creating packet drops , high retransmission rates , and other nuisances under the tcp - ip protocol @xcite .
existence of the core has been experimentally observed @xcite and mathematically proved @xcite if the network is gromov hyperbolic , subject to some highly technical conditions related to the gromov boundary @xcite .
a gromov hyperbolic network can intuitively be defined as a network that `` looks like '' a negatively curved riemannian manifold ( e.g. , a saddle ) when viewed from a distance .
see , e.g. , @xcite for a precise definition .
next to classical networks , one can envision quantum networks : the nodes are spins that can be up @xmath4 ( not excited ) or down @xmath5 ( excited ) and the links are quantum mechanical couplings of the xx or heisenberg type . given some random source - destination pair @xmath6 , a valid question is whether some spin @xmath7 could act as a `` core , '' that is , a spin that could be excited no matter what the source and the destination are . for a linear chain , one would expect such a congestion core in the center as classically any excitation in one half of the chain would have to transit the center of the chain to reach the other half . in this work ,
we demonstrate that quantum - mechanically the transmission of excitations does not need to occur this way , and in fact the center @xmath7 of an odd - length spin chain can act as an `` anti - core , '' excitation of which is avoided . this anti - core , " or `` anti - gravity '' center as it was originally called , was first observed in @xcite . the anti
- core @xmath7 was defined as a point of high inertia , @xmath8 , @xmath9 , as opposed to the classical congestion core that has minimum inertia owing to the negative curvature of the underlying space ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 3.2.1 ) .
the inertia quantifies how difficult communication to and from the anti - core is . as it has been done along this line of work , a pre - metric @xmath10 based on the _ information transfer capacity ( itc ) _ ( see sec . [
s : homogeneous ] ) is employed .
unlike standard quantum mechanical distances @xcite , @xcite , this distance " measure aims to quantify not how distant two fixed quantum states are , but how close to a desired target state a quantum state can get under the evolution of a particular hamiltonian .
the initial and target states are typically orthogonal . in this paper , we provide an _ analytical _ justification of the numerically observed anti - core phenomenon in spin chains with xx coupling , starting with finite - length chains , extending the itc concept to semi- and bi - infinite cases ( sec .
[ s : infinite_chains ] ) , and finally _ proving _ that @xmath11 , @xmath12 in sec .
[ s : anti_core ] .
we further show that by adding a bias on the central spin its _ `` anti - core '' _ property can be made stronger in the sense that the probability of transmission of the excitation to and from it is infinitesimally small ( sec .
[ s : engineered ] ) .
the remaining nagging question is why was it observed in @xcite that spin chains appear gromov - hyperbolic and have an anti - core , while classical networks are gromov hyperbolic with the opposite core ?
this will be clarified in sec .
[ s : engineered ] by means of a spin chain example , showing that its gromov boundary has _ only one _ point , while classical networks need to have _ at least two points _ in their gromov boundary for the core to emerge .
we consider a linear array of two - level systems ( spin @xmath13 particles ) with uniform coupling between adjacent spins ( homogeneous spin chain ) made up of an odd number @xmath14 of physically equally spaced spins with coupling hamiltonian @xmath15 here we shall be primarily interested in the case of xx coupling , for which @xmath16 .
the factor @xmath17 is the pauli matrix along the @xmath18 or @xmath19 direction of spin @xmath1 in the array , i.e. , @xmath20 where the factor @xmath21 occupies the @xmath1th position among the @xmath14 factors and @xmath21 is one of the single spin pauli operators @xmath22 it is easily seen that @xmath23 is _ real _ and symmetric .
the @xmath24 hamiltonian commutes with the operator @xmath25 which counts the total number of excitations .
the hilbert space can therefore be decomposed into subspaces corresponding to the number of excitations .
define @xmath26 to be the quantum state in which the excitation is on spin @xmath1 .
the single excitation subspace @xmath27 is spanned by @xmath28 .
restricted to this subspace , the hamiltonian in this natural basis takes the form @xmath29 for xx coupling ( @xmath16 ) , @xmath30 becomes the @xmath31 toeplitz matrix @xmath32 made up of zeros on the diagonal , ones on the super- and subdiagonal and zeros everywhere else .
table [ t : eigenstructure ] shows the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of @xmath30 . in anticipation of letting @xmath33 ,
define @xmath34 and the preceding sums can be rewritten as @xmath35}_{\mathrm{max}}(i',j ' ) } & = 2\sum_{k'=-n,\mathrm{even}}^{+n } \left|f\left ( 2 \pi x_{k'}i'\right ) g\left ( 2\pi x_{k ' } j'\right)\right|\left(x_{k'+2}-x_{k ' } \right)\\ & \quad + 2 \sum_{k'=-n,\mathrm{odd}}^{+n } \left|\bar{f}\left ( 2 \pi x_{k'}i ' \right ) \bar{g}\left ( 2\pi x_{k ' } j ' \right)\right| \left(x_{k'+2}-x_{k ' } \right ) .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] letting @xmath33 yields @xmath36}_{\mathrm{max}}(i',j')}\\ & = 2\int_{-1/4}^{+1/4 } |f(2\pi xi')g(2\pi x j')| dx + 2\int_{-1/4}^{+1/4}|\bar{f}(2\pi xi')\bar{g}(2\pi x j')| dx.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in order to make the integrations more straightforward and to follow a procedure that parallels the one of appendix [ s : semi_infinite_chains ] , it is convenient to change the integration limits by making use of the periodicity of the integrands as functions of @xmath37 .
observe that both @xmath38 and @xmath39 have decompositions in terms of sines or cosines of arguments @xmath40 .
write the generic term as @xmath41 . if @xmath42 is
even , observe that @xmath43 . if @xmath42 is odd , @xmath44 . in either case
, @xmath45 and @xmath46 have period @xmath47 . with this property ,
the previous integrals can be rewritten as @xmath48 observe that @xmath49 , as easily seen from a cauchy - schwarz argument .
also observe that @xmath50 ; indeed , if @xmath51 , table [ t : in_terms_of ] reveals that the integrands are of the form @xmath52 or @xmath53 , from which the assertion is trivial .
the next step is to make @xmath54 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 more manageable by expressing them as @xmath58 , @xmath59 , @xmath60 , @xmath61 if @xmath62 , @xmath63 , @xmath64 , @xmath65 are sines and by @xmath66 , @xmath67 , @xmath68 , @xmath69 if they are cosines . in the preceding ,
@xmath70 and @xmath71 are odd and even , resp .
, square waves of unit amplitude and of period @xmath72 , with fourier decompositions @xmath73 if @xmath74 and @xmath75 are even , and if we let @xmath33 along the even number subsequence of @xmath76 , we need to take @xmath77 and @xmath78 , as seen from table [ t : in_terms_of ] , together with @xmath79 and @xmath80 .
if on the other hand , we let @xmath81 along the odd number subsequence of @xmath76 , we need to take @xmath82 and @xmath83 , together with @xmath84 and @xmath85 .
however , because of the symmetry of formula , both subsequences yield the same result : @xmath86 from table [ t : in_terms_of ] , we could let @xmath33 along the even number subsequence of @xmath76 , in which case we need to take @xmath82 and @xmath78 .
if we let @xmath81 along the odd number subsequence of @xmath76 , we need to take @xmath77 and @xmath87 . in either case , because of the symmetry of , the result is the same and is given by @xmath88 from the above , it follows that all cases share a few quadrature integrals : @xmath89 the right - hand side of the last equality involves expressions like @xmath90 . to simplify the notation
, we wrote such expressions as @xmath91 . here we proceed from the general formula for @xmath95 , utilize the quadrature integrals of the preceding section , and derive , first , an infinite series representation of the asymptotic maximum transfer probability and , finally , a representation in terms of special functions .
since the general formula is in terms of function @xmath62 , @xmath63 , @xmath64 , @xmath65 that depend on whether @xmath74 and @xmath75 are even or odd ( see section [ s : consistency ] ) , it is necessary to examine each case in particular . from section [ s : consistency ]
, it follows that the case where both @xmath74 and @xmath75 are even and the case where both @xmath74 and @xmath75 are odd are the same . from the same section [ s : consistency ] , the case where @xmath74 is
even and @xmath75 odd is the same as the case where @xmath74 odd and @xmath75 even , but is different from the preceding one .
so , there are essentially two cases to be distinguished .
[ [ both - i - and - j - even - or - both - i - and - j - odd ] ] both @xmath74 and @xmath75 even or both @xmath74 and @xmath75 odd ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ where @xmath97 @xmath98 and @xmath10 are functions taking value @xmath99 or @xmath72 , and complementary in the sense that @xmath100 .
next , we find that @xmath101 where @xmath102 observe that @xmath103 , @xmath104 are relatively prime ; hence they could not be both even .
the developments follow closely the semi - infinite chain case , except that , here , @xmath103 and @xmath104 are not restricted to be positive .
hence we have to consider several cases : here we have to make a distinction between the two cases : both @xmath74 and @xmath75 odd and both @xmath74 and @xmath75 even .
we start with the easy case where in this case indeed , both @xmath109 is even .
this along with @xmath110 is even yields @xmath111 putting everything together , we find , using partial fraction decompositions , @xmath112 the case where is more complicated . if @xmath74 and @xmath75 have the same power of @xmath114 in their prime number factorization , then @xmath115 is even and the preceding formula holds .
if the powers of @xmath114 are different , then @xmath115 is odd and it is easily verified that @xmath116 with the above , we get @xmath117 despite the extra difficulties created by the @xmath98 and @xmath10 functions and the various signs , the pattern remains the same as before : the indicators are nonvanishing only if @xmath126 for some even @xmath110 .
since @xmath74 is odd and @xmath75 is even , @xmath128 does not contain any positive power of @xmath114 in its prime divisors ; therefore , @xmath103 remains odd and @xmath104 remains even ; in other words , @xmath129 is odd . from this observation ,
tedious but elementary manipulations lead to the following : @xmath116 e. jonckheere , f. c. langbein , and s. g. schirmer .
curvature of quantum rings . in _ proceedings of the 5th international symposium on communications , control and
signal processing ( isccsp 2012 ) _ , rome , italy , may 2 - 4 2012 .
e. jonckheere , s. schirmer , and f. langbein . geometry and curvature of spin networks . in _
ieee multi - conference on systems and control _ , pages 786791 , denver , co , september 2011 .
available at arxiv:1102.3208v1 [ quant - ph ] . | significant result of gromov analysis classical networks @xcite is congestion core under network protocol packets least cost paths core defined as point where geodesics cost paths converge creating packet drops high retransmission rates nuisances under tcp - ip protocol @xcite existence core experimentally observed mathematically proved if network is gromov hyperbolic subject to technical conditions related gromov boundary gromov hyperbolic network defined as looks like negatively curved riemannian manifold from distance see @xcite for precise definition classical networks envision quantum networks : nodes are spins be up or down @xmath5 links are quantum mechanical couplings heisenberg type random source - destination pair question is spin @xmath7 could act as `` core be excited no source for linear chain congestion core in center excitation half center to reach work quantum - mechanically transmission of excitations not need to occur this way center @xmath7 of odd - length spin chain can act as anti - core excitation avoided anti - core first observed in @xciteanti - core @xmath7 defined point high inertia @xmath8 @xmath9 opposed to classical congestion core minimum inertia negative curvature underlying space theorem 3.2.1 inertia quantifies difficult communication to and from anti - core pre - metric @xmath10 based on information transfer capacity itc employed unlike standard quantum mechanical distances @xcite distance measure not distant two fixed quantum states close to desired target state under evolution hamiltonian initial and target states typically orthogonal paper analytical justification of observed anti - core phenomenon in spin chains with xx coupling starting finite - length chains extending concept to semi- bi - infinite cases proving @xmath11 , @xmath12 anti_core adding bias on central spin anti - core property stronger probability of transmission excitation from infinitesimally small question why in @xcite spin chains appear gromov - hyperbolic have anti - core classical networks gromov hyperbolic with opposite core ? clarified in sec .engineered spin chain example gromov boundary one point classical networks need two points core emerge consider linear array two - level systems spin @xmath13 particles uniform coupling homogeneous spin chain odd number @xmath14 equally spaced spins coupling hamiltonian @xmath15 interested xx coupling @xmath16 factor @xmath17 pauli matrix @xmath18 @xmath19 direction spin @xmath1 factor @xmath21 @xmath1th position @xmath14 factors single spin pauli operators @xmath22 @xmath23 real symmetric @xmath24 hamiltonian commutes with operator @xmath25 counts total number excitations hilbert space decomposed subspaces number excitations define @xmath26 quantum state excitation on spin @xmath1 single excitation subspace @xmath27 spanned by @xmath28 hamiltonian takes form @xmath29 xx coupling @xmath30 @xmath31 toeplitz matrix @xmath32 zeros diagonal ones super- subdiagonal zeros everywhere else table eigenstructure shows eigenvalues eigenvectors @xmath30@xmath33 define @xmath34 sums rewritten @xmath35}\mathrm{max}}(i',j ' ) = 2\sum_{k'=-n,\mathrm{even}}^{+n }\left 2 \pi x_{k'\right 2 x_{k(x_{k'+2}-x_{k ' } 2 \sum_{k'=-n,\mathrm{odd}}^{+n }\left 2 \pi x_{k'}i\right 2\pi x_{k '(x_{k'+2}-x_{k ' } @xmath33 yields @xmath36\mathrm{max}}(i',j') = 2\int_{-1/4}^{+1/4 }\pi xi')g(2 x j') 2\int_{-1/4}^{+1/4}\pi x j') integrations straightforward appendix semi_infinite_chains change integration limits periodicity integrands functions @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 have decompositions sines cosines arguments @xmath40 write generic term @xmath41@xmath42 even observe @xmath43 @xmath42 odd @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 have period @xmath47 previous integrals rewritten as @xmath48 @xmath49 cauchy - schwarz argument @xmath50 @xmath51 table reveals integrands form @xmath52 or @xmath53 assertion trivial make @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 expressing as @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 sines @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 cosines @xmath70 @xmath71 odd even waves unit amplitude period @xmath72 fourier decompositions @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 even @xmath33 even number subsequence @xmath76 take @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 odd number subsequence @xmath76 take @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85symmetry of formula both subsequences yield same result : @xmath86 from table let @xmath33 along even number subsequence @xmath76 need take @xmath82 and @xmath78 @xmath81 along odd number subsequence @xmath76 take @xmath77 and @xmath87 symmetry result same given by @xmath88 all cases share quadrature integrals : @xmath89 right - hand side last equality involves expressions like @xmath90 wrote expressions as @xmath91 proceed from general formula for @xmath95 utilize quadrature integrals derive infinite series representation of asymptotic maximum transfer probability representation special functions general formula function @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 depend on @xmath74 and @xmath75 even or odd section s : consistency necessary to examine each case case where both @xmath74 and @xmath75 even and odd are same case where @xmath74 even and @xmath75 odd same different from preceding one two cases to be distinguishedboth - i - and - j - even or odd ] both @xmath74 and @xmath75 even or odd @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath10 functions taking value @xmath99 or @xmath72 complementary @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 observe @xmath103 @xmath104 prime both even developments follow semi - infinite chain case @xmath103 and @xmath104 not restricted positive consider several cases distinction between both @xmath74 and @xmath75 odd both @xmath74 and @xmath75 even start easy case @xmath109 even @xmath110 even yields @xmath111 @xmath112 case more complicated if @xmath74 and @xmath75 same power of @xmath114 prime number factorization @xmath115 is even formula holds if powers @xmath114 different @xmath115 is odd verified @xmath116 get @xmath117 despite difficulties by @xmath98 and @xmath10 functions pattern indicators nonvanishing if @xmath126 even @xmath110 @xmath74 odd @xmath75 even @xmath128 positive power @xmath114 prime divisors @xmath103 odd @xmath104 even @xmath129 odd manipulations lead @xmath116 e. jonckheere langbein schirmer curvature quantum rings proceedings 5th international symposium communications control signal processing 2012 rome italy may 2 - 4 2012 jonckheere langbein geometry curvature spin networks ieee multi - conference systems control pages 786791 denver co september 2011 arxiv:1102.3208v1 quant - ph | 0.499381 | 3,153 | 1,684 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,546 | the process @xmath0 is treated by means of three - body integral equations employing in their kernel the _ w_-matrix representation of the subsystem amplitudes . as compared to the plane wave ( born ) approximation the full solution of the integral equations , which takes into account the final state interaction , shows at low energies a 24% enhancement .
the calculations are based on the semirealistic malfliet - tjon and the realistic paris and bonn _ b _ potentials . for comparison with earlier calculations we also present results for the yamaguchi potential . in the low - energy region a remarkable potential dependence is observed , which vanishes at higher energies . | the photodisintegration of @xmath1h and @xmath2he and the inverse reaction , the radiative capture of protons or neutrons by deuterons , have been intensively investigated in the past . due to the fact that the corresponding matrix elements contain both the three - body bound and continuum states
, these reactions are expected to be a good testing ground for the underlying two - body potential . in early calculations by barbour and phillips
@xcite it has been shown that an exact treatment of the continuum states results in a considerable enhancement of the cross section in the peak region . in that work and in the following by gibson and lehman
@xcite only simple @xmath3-wave interactions of yamaguchi type have been used , while @xmath4-components @xmath5 were incorporated in @xcite . the role of @xmath6-wave contributions in the two - body input with respect to the three - body cross section
was investigated by fonseca and lehman @xcite , using again yamaguchi terms in the interaction .
more recently , calculations based on separable representations of the bonn _ a _ and paris potentials , including their higher partial wave contributions , were performed for polarization observables at some specific energies @xcite . in the present work
we calculate the differential cross sections at @xmath7 for the yamaguchi , malfliet - tjon , paris , and bonn _ b _ potentials over an energy region from threshold up to @xmath8 mev . the potential dependence , the effect of higher partial waves , and the role of meson exchange currents , taken into account via siegert s theorem , are investigated .
technically the calculations are based on the faddeev - type alt - grassberger - sandhas ( ags ) formalism @xcite adjusted to photonuclear processes @xcite , as done already in @xcite .
the separable representation of the subsystem _
matrices , relevant in this context , is chosen according to the _
w_-matrix approach @xcite .
this approximation combines high accuracy with considerable simplicity @xcite . a more reliable , still fairly simple representation of the two - body input is provided by the ernst - shakin - thaler method @xcite .
calculations employing the corresponding pest , best , and nest potentials @xcite will be presented in a subsequent publication .
the alt - grassberger - sandhas ( ags ) equations are well known to go over into effective two - body lippmann - schwinger equations @xcite when representing the input two - body
_ t_-operators in separable form .
the neutron - deuteron off - shell scattering amplitude @xmath9 , thus , is determined by @xmath10 applying the same technique to the photodisintegration of the triton into neutron and deuteron , i.e. to the process @xmath11 , an integral equation of rather similar structure is obtained @xcite , @xmath12 where @xmath13 represents an off - shell extension of the full photodisintegration amplitude @xmath14 in both these equations the kernel is given by the effective neutron - deuteron potential @xmath15 and the corresponding effective free green function @xmath16 defined in ref .
however , in eq .
( [ pampl ] ) the inhomogeneity of eq .
( [ scampl ] ) is replaced by an off - shell extension @xmath17 of the plane - wave ( born ) amplitude @xmath18 here @xmath19 and @xmath20 denote the triton and deuteron states , @xmath21 the momentum state of the neutron relative to the center of mass of the deuteron , and @xmath22 the electromagnetic operator .
thus , by this replacement any working program for @xmath23@xmath4 scattering can immediately be applied to the above photoprocess .
the results presented in this paper are , in fact , obtained by extending recent @xmath23@xmath4 calculations @xcite in this manner . as in these references , the separable part of the _ w_-matrix representation @xcite of the two - body _ t _
matrices is employed , @xmath24 here @xmath25 and @xmath26 are the orbital angular momenta , and @xmath27 stands for the spin , the angular momentum j [ with the coupling sequence @xmath28 and the isospin @xmath29 of the two - body subsystem . with the form factors @xmath30 and the propagators @xmath31 of this representation eq .
( [ pampl ] ) reads , after partial wave decomposition and antisymmetrization , @xmath32 and its inhomogeneity is given by @xmath33 here , @xmath34 and @xmath35 represent the free three - body green function and the partial wave projection of the three - body plane wave state @xmath36 .
the detailed structure of the effective potential @xmath37 can be found in ref .
the label @xmath38 denotes the set @xmath39 of quantum numbers , where @xmath40 and @xmath41 are the channel spin of the three nucleons [ with the coupling sequence @xmath42 and the relative angular momentum between the two - body subsystem and the third particle , respectively .
@xmath43 is the total angular momentum following from the coupling sequence @xmath44 , and @xmath45 is the total isospin .
the born amplitude contains the triton bound state @xmath46 , which may be calculated by any of the various bound - state methods . consistently with the present approach we employ for this purpose the partial wave projected homogeneous version of eq .
( [ scampl ] ) , @xmath47 its solutions , the three - body `` form - factors '' @xmath48 , are related to @xmath46 according to @xcite by @xmath49 here , the summation runs over all two - fragment partitions @xmath50 , the variables and quantum numbers being understood in the corresponding set of jacobi coordinates .
the electromagnetic operator entering eq .
( [ bampl ] ) is , at the low energies considered , essentially a dipole operator . ignoring meson - exchange currents it is given by @xmath51 with exchange currents it takes , according to siegert s theorem @xcite , the form @xcite
@xmath52 here @xmath53 and @xmath54 denote the final and the triton energies , @xmath55 the nucleon center - of - mass coordinates , @xmath56 the corresponding momenta , @xmath57 the electric charges , and @xmath58 the polarization of the photon .
the on - shell restricted solutions @xmath59 of the integral eq .
( [ phampl ] ) yield the photodisintegration amplitude via the partial - wave summation @xmath60 where now , in contrast to eq .
( [ mampl ] ) , the spin and angular momentum quantum numbers of the neutron ( @xmath61 ) , deuteron ( @xmath62 ) , triton ( @xmath63 ) , and the polarization ( @xmath58 ) of the photon are explicitly given . denoting this amplitude by @xmath64 ,
the cross section is obtained in the standard way by @xmath65 here we have averaged over the initial states and summed over the final states .
as a first test of our numerical program we performed calculations for the yamaguchi @xcite potential in order to compare them with the corresponding results by gibson and lehman @xcite .
unfortunately , employing the same sets of parameters as in this reference , we read off from the analytically given relations somewhat different values for the two - body scattering length , effective range , and deuteron binding energy ( table i ) .
the triton binding energies , obtained by solving the homogeneous three - body equations , differ in one case , the symmetric tabakin potential , where we found @xmath66mev instead of @xmath67mev ( table iii ) .
these discrepancies mean that our photodisintegration results can not be expected to fully agree with the ones of ref .
@xcite .
figure 1 compares our cross sections for triton - photodisintegration ( solid line ) with the calculations by gibson and lehman @xcite ( dashed line ) .
the disagreement , in particular in the peak region , is reduced when replacing in the siegert operator our triton energy by the gibson - lehman value ( short - dashed line ) .
figure 2 shows the same comparison , but now for the @xmath68he photodisintegration . since there is no disagreement between the @xmath68he binding energies
, a correspondingly modified curve does not exist .
the remaining discrepancies , therefore , have to be attributed to numerical uncertainties , which are not unexpected in view of the level of accuracy reached in early calculations . within these limits
we consider our results for the yamaguchi potential consistent with the ones of ref .
@xcite .
the differential cross sections obtained for the paris @xcite , bonn _ b _
@xcite , malfliet - tjon ( mt i - iii ) @xcite , and yamaguchi potentials are shown in figure 3 .
most remarkable is the strong potential dependence in the peak region , which vanishes at higher energies .
a further observation , which should be relevant in model calculations or when going over to higher particle numbers @xcite , is the proximity of the paris and malfliet - tjon results on the one hand , and less closely the bonn _
b _ and yamaguchi potentials on the other hand . in figure 4
we contrast , for the paris potential , the solution of the integral equation ( solid line ) with the corresponding plane - wave ( born ) approximation ( dashed line ) .
it is seen that the full solution is enhanced by about 24% at the peak .
a similar enhancement was observed for simpler interactions already in ref .
the upper curves are the ones based on the siegert - operator ( [ sieg2 ] ) , the lower ones correspond to the non - siegert operator ( [ sieg1 ] ) .
there is a factor of two between the siegert and non - siegert results , which demonstrates the relevance of meson - exchange currents . for a detailed discussion of the same phenomenon in case of deuteron and @xmath69he photodisintegration
we refer to refs . @xcite and @xcite , respectively .
figures 5 and 6 compare our cross sections for the s- and d - wave projected paris and bonn _ b _ potentials with the data from refs .
figures 7 and 8 show the same with inclusion of the subsystem @xmath6 waves , which leads to a reduction of the peak by 810% . up to 25 mev the best agreement with the data is achieved for the bonn _
b _ potential . in view of the experimental errors
the relevance of this observation is , of course , somewhat questionable . at higher energies the potential dependence vanishes .
it is , however , seen that the incorporation of the @xmath6 waves is essential for the remarkable agreement with most recent experimental data @xcite .
note that for the inverse reaction the relevance of the @xmath6 wave contributions has been pointed out also in @xcite .
two fragment photodisintegration of the three - nucleon bound states , thus , provides a sensitive tool for testing the underlying two - nucleon potentials . a repetition of the corresponding low - energy measurements with much higher accuracy is strongly suggested by this observation . | photodisintegration of @xmath1h @xmath2he inverse reaction radiative capture protons neutrons by deuterons investigated matrix elements contain three - body continuum states reactions testing for two - body potential early calculations barbour phillips treatment continuum states cross section peak region gibson lehman @xmath3-wave interactions yamaguchi used @xmath4-components @xmath5 incorporated in @xcite role @xmath6-wave contributions in two - body input - body cross section investigated by fonseca lehman yamaguchi terms calculations bonn _ a _ paris potentials higher partial wave contributions performed for polarization observables specific energies present work differential cross sections at @xmath7 for yamaguchi malfliet - tjon paris bonn _ b _ potentials over energy region to @xmath8 mev potential dependence effect of higher partial waves role meson exchange currents s investigated calculations based on faddeev - type alt - grassberger - sandhas formalism adjusted to photonuclear processes separable representation subsystem matrices chosen w_-matrix approach @xciteapproximation combines accuracy simplicity reliable simple representation two - body input by ernst - shakin - thaler method calculations pest best nest potentials presented subsequent publication alt - grassberger - sandhas equations into two - body lippmann - schwinger equations two - body-operators separable neutron - deuteron off - shell scattering amplitude determined by @xmath10 applying technique to photodisintegration triton into neutron deuteron integral equation similar structure obtained represents off - shell extension of full photodisintegration amplitude kernel given by effective neutron - deuteron potential @xmath15 effective free green function defined eq. inhomogeneity replaced by off - extension @xmath17 of plane - wave amplitude @xmath19 @xmath20 denote triton deuteron states momentum state neutron relative center of mass deuteron electromagnetic operator replacement working program for @xmath23@xmath4 scattering applied to photoprocess results paper obtained by extending recent @xmath23@xmath4 calculations @xcitereferences separable part w-matrix representation two - body matrices employed @xmath24 orbital angular momenta spin angular momentum coupling sequence @xmath28 isospin @xmath29 two - body subsystem form factors @xmath30 propagators @xmath31 representation partial wave decomposition antisymmetrization @xmath32 inhomogeneity @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 free three - body green function partial wave projection three - body plane wave state @xmath36 detailed structure effective potential @xmath37 ref label @xmath38 set @xmath39 quantum numbers @xmath40 @xmath41 channel spin three nucleons coupling sequence @xmath42 relative angular momentum two - body subsystem third particle @xmath43 total angular momentum coupling sequence @xmath45 total isospin born amplitude contains triton bound state @xmath46 calculated - state methods partial wave projected homogeneous version eq @xmath47 solutions three - body form - factors @xmath48 related @xmath46 @xmath49 summation two - fragment partitions @xmath50 variables quantum numbers understood jacobi coordinateselectromagnetic operator entering eq . low energies dipole operator ignoring meson - exchange currents given by @xmath51 exchange currents siegert s theorem @xcite form @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 denote final triton energies @xmath55 nucleon center - - mass coordinates @xmath56 momenta @xmath57 electric charges @xmath58 polarization of photon on - shell restricted solutions @xmath59 eq yield photodisintegration amplitude via partial - wave summation @xmath60 contrast to eq . spin angular momentum quantum numbers of neutron deuteron triton polarization of photon given denoting amplitude by @xmath64 cross section obtained by @xmath65 averaged over initial states summed over final states first calculations for yamaguchi @xcite potential with results gibson and lehman @xcite different values for two - body scattering length effective range deuteron binding energy triton binding energies three - body equations differ in one case symmetric tabakin potential found @xmath66mev instead of @xmath67mevdiscrepancies mean photodisintegration results agree with ref . @xcite figure 1 compares cross sections for triton - photodisintegration with calculations gibson and lehman @xcite disagreement in peak region reduced when replacing triton energy by gibson - lehman value figure 2 shows comparison for @xmath68he photodisintegration no disagreement between @xmath68he binding energies modified curve remaining discrepancies attributed to numerical uncertainties not unexpected accuracy in consider results for yamaguchi potential consistent with ref . @xcite differential cross sections for paris bonn _ b _ malfliet - tjon yamaguchi potentials shown in figure 3 strong potential dependence in peak region vanishes at higher energies observation proximity of paris and malfliet - tjon results bonn _ b _ and yamaguchi potentials in figure 4 for paris potential solution of integral equation with plane - wave ( approximation ) full solution enhanced by about 24% at peak similar enhancement observed for simpler interactions in ref .upper curves siegert - operator sieg2 lower non - siegert operator sieg1 factor of two between siegert non - siegert results relevance meson - exchange currents detailed discussion deuteron @xmath69he photodisintegration refer refs @xcite @xcite figures 5 6 compare cross sections s- d - wave projected paris bonn _ b _ potentials with data refs figures 7 8 subsystem @xmath6 waves reduction peak by 810% up to 25 mev best agreement bonn _ b _ potential experimental errors relevance questionable higher energies potential dependence vanishes incorporation @xmath6 waves essential for agreement with data @xcite inverse reaction relevance @xmath6 wave contributions pointed @xcite two fragment photodisintegration three - nucleon bound states sensitive tool testing two - nucleon potentials repetition low - energy measurements higher accuracy suggested | 0.355692 | 2,491 | 1,269 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,555 | knowledge of the @xmath0-ray branching ratios of the 7.12-mev state of @xmath1o is important for the extrapolation of the @xmath2c(@xmath3,@xmath0)@xmath1o cross section to astrophysical energies .
ground state transitions provide most of the @xmath2c(@xmath3,@xmath0)@xmath1o total cross section while cascade transitions have contributions of the order of 10 - 20@xmath4 . determining the @xmath5-mev branching ratio will also result in a better extrapolation of the cascade and @xmath6 ground state cross section to low energies .
we report here on measurements on the branching ratio of the @xmath5-mev transition in @xmath1o . | a typical star spends 90@xmath4 of its lifetime burning hydrogen on the main sequence . when hydrogen is exhausted in the center , the remaining helium core contracts transforming gravitational potential energy into thermal energy . as the temperature increases helium burning starts .
the first step of this process is the triple-@xmath3 capture to form @xmath2c , followed by the @xmath2c radiative capture of @xmath3 particles to form @xmath1o @xcite . in the helium - burning phase of stellar evolution the triple-@xmath3 process and
@xmath2c(@xmath3,@xmath0)@xmath1o are the most important reactions .
their relative reaction rates determine the @xmath2c@xmath7@xmath1o ratio at the end of helium burning and beyond .
the triple-@xmath3 reaction rate is well known for stellar evolution calculations .
however the rate of @xmath2c(@xmath3,@xmath0)@xmath1o is poorly determined as the cross section was measured experimentally down to energies around 1 mev and needs to be extrapolated to helium - burning energies around 300 kev .
the @xmath2c(@xmath3,@xmath0)@xmath1o cross section is composed of 3 major parts : e1 , e2 ground state transitions and cascade transitions .
ground state transitions provide most of the total cross section while cascade transitions have contributions of the order of 10 - 20@xmath4 . determining the @xmath8-mev branching ratio will result in a better extrapolation of the cascade and @xmath6 ground state cross sections to lower energies @xcite .
the 7.12-mev excited state in @xmath1o is formed via the @xmath9f(p,@xmath3)@xmath1o@xmath10 reaction ; a level diagram is shown in fig . [
fig : levels ] .
a 100-@xmath11g/@xmath12-thick caf@xmath13 layer evaporated onto a 1-mm - thick carbon backing was bombarded by protons produced at the 4.5-mv tandem van de graaf accelerator at ohio university .
an angular distribution study for the 7.12-mev @xmath0-ray at 4 different proton energies was performed .
these measurements offered a better understanding of the @xmath0-ray angular distribution for the strong transitions and information on the dependence of the relative intensity of the three @xmath0-ray components with proton energy . in fig .
[ fig : peakratio ] the relative intensities of the strong transitions in the direction of the beam are shown .
for the branching - ratio measurements the proton beam energy was chosen to be e@xmath14=2.0025 mev in order to maximize the relative population of the 7.12-mev state @xcite .
the coincidence setup uses a two - detector configuration . for the detection of the @xmath15-mev transition
, a 22.9-cm @xmath16 22.9-cm nai(tl ) split annulus consisting of two optically - isolated sections is used .
the large volume of the crystal offers a 30@xmath4 efficiency in detecting the 6 - 7 mev @xmath0-rays .
the inside cylindrical hole in the crystal is able to accommodate an extended target holder as sketched in fig .
[ fig : upview ] . for the @xmath5-mev transition a hpge detector is used .
this detector has a planar geometry to lower the noise and achieve better time resolution for low - energy gamma rays .
the efficiency of different detector geometries and thicknesses was simulated using the geant3 simulation package .
the simulation looked for the optimum ge thickness to maximize the photopeak efficiency at 200 kev while minimizing the sensitivity to 7-mev @xmath0-rays .
a planar crystal of 1.5-cm thickness and 2000-mm@xmath17 area was chosen . to further lower the background in the 0.2-mev region of interest a tungsten shield
was utilized to minimize the scattering of @xmath0-rays between detectors .
the design of the shield was also guided by the geant3 simulation package .
data on @xmath0-@xmath0 coincidences was taken for 4 days , in 24 hour shifts , with beam currents ranging from 10 to 20 na . a standard coincidence setup fed the signal from the detectors and the time - to - amplitude converter ( tac ) into a 4096 channels data acquisition system .
the time resolution of the system ( for energy signals of interest ) was 5 ns .
the spectrum shown in fig .
[ fig : spectrum ] was obtained by the hpge detector using gate settings on the tac coincidence peak and the 6 - 7 mev region in the nai(tl ) detector .
-mev transition is indicated .
right figure : expanded 200-kev region with the 197-kev peak from the @xmath9f(p , p@xmath18 ) reaction and the position of a possible @xmath5-mev transition.,title="fig : " ] -mev transition is indicated .
right figure : expanded 200-kev region with the 197-kev peak from the @xmath9f(p , p@xmath18 ) reaction and the position of a possible @xmath5-mev transition.,title="fig : " ] for the @xmath19-mev transition the peak is clearly visible between channels 3000 and 3250 in fig .
[ fig : spectrum ] .
the region surrounding the peak was fitted to subtract the background and obtain the number of counts in the @xmath19-mev transition peak .
calibrated sources and geant3 simulations were used to find the efficiencies of the detectors .
the result obtained for this branching ratio is @xmath20 , in good agreement with a previous measurement by wilkinson et al .
@xcite .
the coincident hpge spectrum near 200 kev is dominated by the 197.1-kev line which results from random - coincidence @xmath9f(p , p@xmath18 ) events detected in the hpge .
no peak is evident at 199.8 kev corresponding to the @xmath5-mev transition .
it should be noted that the hpge detector resolution is 1.3 kev at 200 kev , so energy range of interest is well resolved from the 197.1-kev line . from the spectrum shown in fig .
[ fig : spectrum ] we have obtained the following upper limit with a 2-@xmath21 confidence level : @xmath22 note that if the @xmath5-mev transition were to have the same weisskopf strength as the @xmath23-mev transition this branching ratio would be @xmath24 .
the results are preliminary and further analysis of the data may reveal more information .
histogram manipulation and improved geant3 simulations will be performed to further understand the limitations of the present setup and perhaps discover improvements to the experimental approach .
it is a pleasure to thank j. bevington , d. carter , c. dodson , d. jacobs , t. massey , j. odonnell , y. parpottas , a. salas , and r. wheeler for assistance with the experiments .
this work was supported in part by the u.s .
department of energy , under grant no .
de - fg02 - 88er40387 . | star spends 90@xmath4 burning hydrogen hydrogen exhausted helium core contracts gravitational into thermal energy temperature increases helium burning starts first step triple-@xmath3 capture @xmath2c followed radiative capture @xmath1o helium - burning phase triple-@xmath3 @xmath2c(@xmath1o important reactions rates determine @xmath2c@xmath7@xmath1o ratio helium burning triple-@xmath3 reaction rate known evolution rate @xmath2c(@xmath1o poorly determined cross section measured 1 mev helium - burning energies around 300 kev @xmath2c@xmath1o cross section 3 parts e1 e2 ground state transitions cascade transitions ground state transitions provide cross section 10 - 20@xmath4 determining @xmath8-mev branching ratio extrapolation cascade cross sections lower energies 7.12-mev excited state in @xmath1o formed via @xmath9f(p@xmath1o@xmath10 reaction level diagram in fig .100-@xmath11g@xmath13 layer evaporated 1-mm carbon backing by protons 4.5-mv tandem van de graaf accelerator ohio university angular distribution study 7.12-mev @xmath0-ray at 4 proton energies performed measurements understanding-ray angular distribution strong transitions dependence relative intensity three components with proton energy fig . relative intensities strong transitions proton beam energy e@xmath14=2.0025 mev population 7.12-mev state setup two - detector configuration @xmath15-mev transition 22.9-cm @xmath16 22.9-cm split annulus two - isolated sections large volume offers 30@xmath4 efficiency detecting 6 - 7 mev @xmath0-rays inside cylindrical hole extended target holder for @xmath5-mev transition hpge detector used planar geometry noise time resolution for low - energy gamma rays efficiency detector geometries thicknesses simulated geant3 simulation package optimum thickness photopeak efficiency at 200 kev sensitivity to 7-mev @xmath0-rays planar crystal 1.5-cm thickness 2000-mm@xmath17 area chosenlower background 0.2-mev region tungsten shield utilized minimize scattering @xmath0-rays between detectors design guided by geant3 simulation package data on @xmath0- coincidences taken 4 days 24 hour shifts beam currents 10 to 20 na standard coincidence setup fed signal from detectors time - to - amplitude converter into 4096 channels data acquisition system time resolution 5 ns spectrum fig obtained by hpge detector gate settings on tac coincidence peak 6 - 7 mev region in nai(tl ) detector -mev transition indicated expanded 200-kev region 197-kev peak from @xmath9f reaction position possible @xmath5-mev transition 197-kev peak @xmath19-mev transition peak visible between channels 3000 and 3250 region surrounding peak fitted to subtract background obtain number counts in @xmath19-mev transition peak calibrated sources geant3 simulations used efficiencies detectors result branching ratio is @xmath20 with previous measurement by wilkinson et al .coincident hpge spectrum near 200 kev dominated by 197.1-kev line from random @xmath9f@xmath18 events no peak at 199.8 kev @xmath5-mev transition hpge detector resolution 1.3 kev at 200 kev energy range resolved from 197.1-kev line spectrum fig obtained upper limit 2-@xmath21 confidence level : @xmath22 if @xmath5-mev transition same weisskopf strength as @xmath23-mev branching ratio @xmath24 results preliminary further analysis may reveal more histogram manipulation improved geant3 simulations understand limitations discover improvements j. bevington d carter dodson jacobs massey odonnell parpottas salas r wheeler assistance supported by u.s . department of energy grant - fg02 - 88er40387 | 0.263014 | 1,645 | 861 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,558 | selected results from the hegra experiment on charged cosmic rays and on very high energy gamma - rays are presented .
the magic telescope is presented as an outlook to the future of gamma - ray astronomy .
* selected results from * + * ground - based cosmic ray and * + * gamma - ray experiments * + n. magnussen + _ bergische universitt wuppertal + gaustr . 20 , d-42097 wuppertal , germany _ | as a general rule the dynamic range of precision detectors is limited to roughly 2 to 3 orders of magnitude in energy . in case of the charged cosmic rays ( cr ) with an energy spectrum extending over more than 13 orders of magnitude ,
this neccesitates a large number of different experimental setups in order to cover the full spectrum .
space - borne , i.e. direct , experiments , cover the spectrum from @xmath0 10@xmath1 ev to @xmath0 10@xmath2 ev / nucleon , and ground - based experiments operate above total energies of a few 10@xmath3 ev up to more than 10@xmath4 ev . in the following
we will concentrate on the ground - based measurements . here
various experiments which are sensitive in the energy region around 10@xmath2 ev consistently show a significant steepening of the all - particle spectrum around this energy .
when studying the data more closely , however , the agreement between the experiments turns out to be not so good , i.e. , differences well above the fluctuations given by the individual errors .
this is shown in fig . 1 where the data on the knee in the all - particle spectrum are collected @xcite .
from these data one must conclude that the absolute position , the sharpness of the knee , and also the absolute flux in this energy region are more uncertain than expected from the individual errors .
ground - based experiments use a detector , i.e. the atmosphere as absorber with some added readout elements , like scintillators , cherenkov detectors , etc . , which can only be calibrated in the laboratory to a very limited degree .
the calibration therefore has to rely very heavily on mc simulations of the development of the extensive air showers and of the performance of the detectors .
one possible reason for the deviations in the measured spectra might thus be the use of different monte carlo ( mc ) generators in the data analyses .
this will be briefly discussed below for the most recent data .
currently the two experiments hegra @xcite , located within the observatorio del roque de los muchachos on the canary island la palma , and kascade @xcite , located near karlsruhe , germany , are analysing their airshower data with respect to the all - particle spectrum and the chemical composition of the cr near the knee. in the following we shall discuss some of the preliminary hegra results and compare to kascade where appropriate .
the hegra setup for the detection of cr with energies above @xmath5 15 tev has 3 components : ( i ) 243 scintillator stations of 1 m@xmath6 each distributed over 40,000 m@xmath6 , ( ii ) 77 airobicc cherenkov detectors spread out over the same area , and ( iii ) 17 geiger towers within the central 15,000 m@xmath6 .
the measured distribution of particle densities in the scintillator array is fitted to yield the shower size n@xmath7at detector level and the correlated shower size at the maximum ( x@xmath8 ) of the shower development . the lateral cherenkov light density , @xmath9 , is analysed in the intervall 7.5 @xmath10 100 m and can be described by an exponential @xmath11 where the shape parameter , @xmath12 , is inversely proportional to the _ absolute _ penetration depth , x@xmath13 , of the analysed shower . as mc investigation show
, this proportionality is essentially independent of the mass , a , of the incident primary particle .
the achieved resolution for x@xmath13 varies between 1.0 and @xmath0 0.5 radiation lenghts ( x@xmath14 = 36 g/@xmath15 ) for energies between 100 tev and a few pev .
the reconstruction of the energy in two independent analyses relies either on a combination of n@xmath7 and @xmath12 , or on a combination of n@xmath7 , n@xmath16(the corresponding muon shower size ) , and @xmath12 . in both cases
an energy resolution of @xmath030% is achieved . using the corsika simulation program @xcite different hadronic interaction generators ( i.e. , venus , qgsjet , hdpm , dpmjet , sibyll ) can be used .
mc investigation have shown that the qualitative sensitivity for physics parameters and e.g. the energy resolution is independent of the hadronic interaction generator .
the absolute energy scale , however , turns out to be dependent on the mc generator and the chemical composition . using the venus model within corsika
, hegra performed a regularized unfolding of the measured n@xmath17 distributions on a run - by - run basis ( see @xcite for details ) .
the result of the unfolding is shown in fig . 2 . the spectral index of the all - particle spectrum _ below _ the knee is found to be @xmath18 where the last error is an estimation of the dependence on the hadronic interaction generator in the mc . in order to get a first indication of the behaviour of the chemical composition around the knee and in order to check the mc generators , hegra made in one analysis the simple ansatz of using parametrized mc distributions for the energy determination @xcite . a more involved unfolding procedure based on the full
mc and detector information is used in a second analysis decribed in detail in @xcite . in both analyses the composition around the knee is observed to be consistent with an unchanged or slightly heavier composition . for illustrating the results and the observed mc dependence the first approach is discussed in the following . in the energy range from 300 tev to 3 pev
the height of the individual shower maxima can be reconstructed with an accuracy comparable to the rms spread for iron showers ( rms(x@xmath19 ) = 33 @xmath20 2 g/@xmath15 ) and thus much better than the rms spread for proton showers ( rms(x@xmath21 ) = 84 @xmath20 6 g/@xmath15 ) .
since the mean x@xmath13 values of protons and iron showers differ by about 140 g/@xmath15 , the fractions of light ( hydrogen and helium ) and heavy elements ( oxygen and iron ) contributing to the measured distribution can thus be obtained from fitting model x@xmath13distributions to the data for different energy bins .
the details of this analysis can be found in @xcite . under the assumption that the chemical composition is the same for the different energy bins , the mean fraction of light elements is fitted to be 0.52 @xmath20 0.10 ( total error ) , which within errors
, is compatible with direct measurements below 100 tev . besides the shape of the x@xmath13 distribution the mean value may serve to determine the elemental composition .
the measured mean values , however , turn out to be systematically smaller by 45 @xmath20 24 g/@xmath15 than expected from mc for the composition compatible with the fitted fractions which are based on the _ detailed shape _ of the x@xmath13 distribution .
this apparant discrepancy between data and mc can be due to detector , atmospheric , or mc generator effects .
after careful investigations hegra now suspects the longitudinal shower development in the mc to yield too large x@xmath13 values due to a non - perfect simulation of the longitudinal shower development .
the investigations , however , are not yet completed .
note that the airobicc - type detectors as employed e.g. by hegra are the only airshower detectors which are sensitive to the _ absolute _ position of the shower maximum due to the translation of the longitudinal development into the radial cherenkov photon density .
this is a consequence of the varying refractive index and height of emission along the shower . like hegra
, the kascade collaboration also finds little change in the chemical composition around the knee @xcite . the absolute determination which relies on the mc is , however , still biased by large discrepancies between some of the hadronic interaction generators . here
still considerable effort is needed in order to achive reliable results in the future .
since the detection of the crab nebula as a source of gamma - rays ( @xmath22-rays ) with energies above 500 gev in 1989 @xcite , about 10 galactic and extragalactic sources of very high energetic photons ( e @xmath23 300 gev ) have been detected by about as many experiments .
the status of the field is indicated in fig .
3 which shows the skymap of the very high energy ( vhe ) , i.e. , @xmath24 300 gev , @xmath22-ray sources as of august 1997 .
note that contrary to former beliefs also extragalactic sources of vhe @xmath22-rays were discovered during the last 5 years .
the fast progress of the field will be illustrated by the most recent hegra results concerning the brightest source on the @xmath22-ray sky in 1997 , the active galactic nucleus ( agn ) mkn 501 at a distance of @xmath25 = 0.034 ( @xmath0 600 million light years , for h@xmath14= 50 km sec@xmath26mpc@xmath26 ) . in 1996
the hegra experiment completed the installation of six imaging air cherenkov telescopes ( iacts ) .
four identical iacts are operated in coincident mode , i.e. for each airshower four different views are recorded .
hereby the energy threshold can be lowered and the @xmath22/hadron separation efficiency can be raised .
this is an advantage for the study of weak and especially for extended sources but is less than optimal for strong point - like sources due to the restricted effective collection area .
for the current energy range of iacts , i.e. above 300 gev , and the current stage of @xmath22-ray astronomy , i.e. the discovery age in which we learn how to optimize the detectors , this setup , however , has its merits due to the redundancy of the information . for energies below 100 gev where air showers only produce very little cherenkov light ,
however , the redundancy will be lost to a large degree due to the very limited number of particles above the cherenkov threshold , i.e. , different telescopes will view different tracks in the shower . in this energy regime therefore very sensitive telescopes like the magic telescope discussed below will be needed and which will not compromise on the effective photo collection area .
mkn 501 belongs to the blazar class of agn , i.e. it is an agn with a large plasma jet which is pointing along the line - of - sight , and it has been observed at tev energies since 1995 @xcite when its activity level corresponded to about 8% of the flux of the strongest galactic source , the crab nebula . due to its steady emission level the crab nebula has become the standard candle for @xmath22-ray astronomy .
the activity level of mkn 501 in 1996 rose to about 30% of the crab flux @xcite and in 1997 hegra recorded on average a flux corresponding to about 200% of the crab flux , and , in addition to this much higher average activity level , huge flares on time - scales as short as a day or less were recorded .
as summarized in @xcite a great number of cherenkov telescopes ( whipple , cat , tactic , telescope array , hegra ) were able to detect this signal and record a light curve .
the most complete light curve was obtained by the stand - alone telescopes ct1 and ct2 of the hegra collaboration , because ct1 was also operational during moonshine . the light curve extending from march until september 1997 is shown in fig . 4 . the short - term flares point towards very compact sources , i.e. regions in the vicinity of the supermassive ( @xmath27(10@xmath28)m@xmath29 ) black hole thought to be in the centre of the galaxy and powering the very strong non - thermal emission of the agn .
these large fluxes , which for the first time were recorded from an extragalactic source , allowed the determination of the energy spectrum extending beyond 5 tev .
the energy spectrum as measured by the hegra iact system telescopes in 1997 is shown in fig . 5 @xcite .
as the analysis of systematic effects at higher energies is not yet completed , the spectrum is only shown up to 10 tev .
but already the unabsorbed spectrum extending up to 10 tev allows to extract a fundamentally important upper limit on the density of infrared ( ir ) relic photons in intergalactic space .
this density is dependent on the era of galaxy formation and thus on the nature of the dark matter .
one extraction of an upper limit on the infrared photon density was performed in @xcite where it is assumed that the ir background is uniformly distributed in the universe .
the result , together with existing upper limits , lower limits , and an average model for galaxy evolution based on a mixed dark matter ansatz is shown in fig .
the resulting low density of infrared photons limits the parameter space for dark matter models and at the same time opens up the deeper regions of the universe ( i.e. @xmath25 = @xmath27(0.1 ) ) for tev astronomy .
currently space - borne @xmath22-astronomy is limited to energies _ below _ 10 gev and ground - based @xmath22-astronomy to energies _ above _ 300 gev . in both cases the reasons are limitations of sensitivity and/or effective collection areas .
the result is an observation gap between 10 gev and 300 gev where the universe has not been observed in and where we expect to find hints or answers to important physics questions in astrophysics , cosmology , and particle physics . in order to bridge this gap the ground - based 17 m diameter magic telescope ( see fig .
7 ) has been designed during the last 2 years @xcite . using innovative elements it will be possible to close the last observation gap for about 1% ( ! ) of the cost of a satellite experiment , which until now was believed to be necessary in order to do measurements in this energy domain . at the same time
the sensitivity in the energy region of current cherenkov telescopes will be improved by up to an order of magnitude . | dynamic range of precision detectors limited to 2 to 3 orders of magnitude in energy charged cosmic rays energy spectrum over than 13 orders of magnitude experimental setups to cover full spectrum space - borne experiments cover spectrum from@xmath1 ev to 10@xmath2 ev / ground - based experiments operate above energies 10@xmath3 ev to 10@xmath4 ev concentrate on ground - based measurements experiments sensitive in energy region around 10@xmath2 ev show significant steepening of all - particle spectrum agreement between experiments not good differences above fluctuations individual errors shown in fig . 1 data on knee all - particle spectrum collected absolute position sharpness of knee absolute flux in region uncertain ground - based experiments use atmosphere as absorber with added readout elements like scintillators cherenkov detectors calibrated in laboratory limited calibration on mc simulations air showers performance of detectors possible reason for deviations in measured spectra use of different monte carlo ( mc ) generators in data analyses discussed below for recent dataexperiments hegra @xcite observatorio del roque kascade @xcite karlsruhe analysing airshower data all - particle spectrum chemical composition cr near knee discuss preliminary hegra results compare kascade hegra setup for detection cr energies above 15 tev 3 components 243 scintillator stations over 40,000 m@xmath6 77 airobicc cherenkov detectors 17 geiger towers central 15,000 m@xmath6 measured distribution particle densities array shower size n@xmath7at detector level shower size at maximum x@xmath8 lateral cherenkov light density @xmath9 analysed in intervall 7.5 @xmath10 100 m described exponential @xmath11 shape parameter @xmath12 inversely proportional to penetration depth@xmath13 shower independent of mass incident primary particle resolution for x@xmath13 varies between 1.0 and 0.5 radiation lenghts ( x@xmath14 = 36 g/@xmath15 ) for energies between 100 tev and pev reconstruction energy relies on n@xmath7 @xmath12 or n@xmath7 n@xmath16 @xmath12 energy resolution of @xmath030% achievedcorsika simulation program @xcite hadronic interaction generators venus qgsjet hdpm dpmjet sibyll used investigation qualitative sensitivity for physics parameters energy resolution independent of hadronic generator absolute energy scale dependent on mc generator chemical composition venus model hegra performed regularized unfolding of measured n@xmath17 distributions run - - run see @xcite details result shown in fig . 2 spectral index all - particle spectrum below knee @xmath18 last error estimation dependence on hadronic interaction generator chemical composition knee check mc generators hegra parametrized mc distributions for energy determination @xcite involved unfolding procedure mc detector information used second analysis @xcite composition around knee consistent with unchanged or slightly heavier composition illustrating results mc dependence first approach discussed energy range from 300 tev to 3 pev height of individual shower maxima reconstructed accuracy comparable to rms spread for iron showers (@xmath19 ) = 33 2 better than spread proton showers = 84 6 )mean x@xmath13 values of protons iron showers differ 140 g/@xmath15 fractions of light hydrogen helium heavy elements oxygen iron ) distribution obtained from model x@xmath13distributions different energy bins details analysis in @xcite chemical composition same for bins mean fraction of light elements 0.52 @xmath20 0.10 ( total error ) compatible with measurements below 100 tev mean value may elemental composition measured mean values smaller by 45 24 g/@xmath15 than expected from mc for composition compatible with fractions discrepancy between data mc due to detector atmospheric mc generator effects hegra suspects longitudinal shower development mc yield too large x@xmath13 values due non - perfect simulation investigations not completed airobicc - type detectors hegra only airshower sensitive to position shower maximum due to translation longitudinal development radial cherenkov photon density consequence varying refractive index height emission kascade collaboration finds little change in chemical composition around knee @xcite absolute determination on mc biased by discrepancies between hadronic interaction generatorseffort needed reliable results future since detection crab nebula gamma - rays @xmath22-rays above 500 gev 1989 10 galactic extragalactic sources high energetic photons ( @xmath23 300 gev ) detected experiments status field in fig . 3 skymap high energy @xmath24 300 gev @xmath22-ray sources as of august 1997 extragalactic sources vhe @xmath22-rays discovered last 5 years fast progress illustrated by hegra results brightest source @xmath22-ray sky 1997 active galactic nucleus mkn 501 distance @xmath25 = 0.034 ( @xmath0 600 million light years h@xmath14= 50 km sec@xmath26mpc 1996 hegra experiment six imaging air cherenkov telescopes four operated four views recorded energy threshold lowered @xmath22/hadron separation efficiency raised advantage for weak extended sources less than optimal for strong sources restricted collection area current energy range iacts above 300 gev current stage @xmath22-ray astronomy discovery age setup has merits due to redundancy informationenergies below 100 gev air showers produce little cherenkov light redundancy lost due to limited particles above cherenkov threshold different telescopes view different tracks in shower this energy regime sensitive telescopes like magic telescope needed not compromise photo collection area mkn 501 belongs to blazar class of agn large plasma jet pointing along line - of - sight observed at tev energies since 1995 activity level 8% flux strongest galactic source crab nebula steady emission level crab nebula standard candle for @xmath22-ray astronomy activity level mkn 501 in 1996 rose to 30% of crab flux 1997 hegra recorded flux 200% crab flux huge flares on time - scales day or less recorded cherenkov telescopes signal light curve complete light curve obtained by telescopes ct1 and ct2 hegra collaboration light curve from march until september 1997 shown in fig . 4 short - term flares point towards compact sources supermassive ( ) black hole centre galaxy powering strong non - thermal emission of agn large fluxes first recorded from extragalactic source allowed determination energy spectrum beyond 5 tev energy spectrum measured by hegra iact system telescopes 1997 shown in fig . 5 analysis effects higher energies not completed spectrum up to 10 tev unabsorbed spectrum up to 10 tev allows upper limit on density infrared photons in intergalactic space density on era galaxy formation nature dark matter extraction upper limit infrared photon density performed in @xcite ir distributed result upper lower average model galaxy evolution mixed matter shown in fig . low density infrared photons limits parameter space for dark matter models opens deeper regions universe for tev astronomy space - borne @xmath22-astronomy limited to energies below 10 gev ground - based @xmath22-astronomy above 300 gev limitations collection areas result observation gap between 10 gev and 300 gev universe not observed physics questions astrophysics cosmology particle physics bridge gap ground - based 17 m diameter magic telescope fig . 7 designed 2 yearsusing innovative elements close last observation gap for 1% cost satellite experiment necessary measurements in energy domain sensitivity in energy region of current cherenkov telescopes improved up to order of magnitude . | 0.500108 | 3,087 | 1,560 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,560 | in this note we give an introduction to the topic of quantum control , explaining what its objectives are , and describing some of its limitations . | the objectives of quantum control are to find ways to manipulate the time evolution of a quantum system such as to drive an initial given state to a pre - determined final state , the target state ; or optimize the expectation value of a target observable . among a wealth of applications
are those to quantum computing , where it is clearly essential to be able to start off a quantum procedure with a given initial state , and to problems involving the population levels in atomic systems , such as the laser cooling of atomic or molecular systems .
the mathematical tools necessary for the theoretical investigation of these control problems are diverse , involving algebraic , group theoretic and topological methods . the questions that one may ask include : when is a given quantum system completely controllable ?
if a system is not completely controllable , how does this affect optimization of a given operator ?
how near can you get to a target state for a not completely controllable system ?
the answer to the first question depends on a knowledge of the lie algebra generated by the system s quantum hamiltonian , that to the second arises from properties of the lie group structure , while the last clearly involves ideas of topology . especially in the area of lie group theory
, there is a large corpus of classical mathematics which can supply answers to questions arising in quantum control .
in particular , for the type of controllability known as _ pure state controllability _ classical lie group theory has already given the basic results .
the quantum control system we shall consider is typically of the form @xmath0 where @xmath1 is the internal hamiltonian of the unperturbed system and @xmath2 are interaction terms governing the interaction of the system with an external field . the dynamical evolution of the system is governed by the unitary evolution operator @xmath3 , which satisfies the schrodinger equation @xmath4 with initial condition @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the identity operator . by use of the magnus expansion , it can be shown that the solution @xmath7 involves all the commutators of the @xmath8 .
the operators @xmath8 , @xmath9 , in ( [ eq : h ] ) are hermitian .
their skew - hermitian counterparts @xmath10 generate a lie algebra @xmath11 known as the dynamical lie algebra of the control system which is always a subalgebra of @xmath12 , or for trace - zero hamiltonians , @xmath13 .
the degree of controllability is determined by the dynamical lie algebra generated by the control system hamiltonian @xmath14 . if @xmath15 then _ all _
the unitary operators are generated and we call such a system _ completely controllable_. a large variety of common quantum systems can be shown to be completely controllable @xcite .
the interesting cases arise when @xmath11 is a proper subalgebra of @xmath12 .
such systems may still exhibit _ pure state controllability _ , in that starting with any initial pure state any target pure state may be obtained , as distinct from the completely controllable case , when all ( kinematically admissible ) states pure or mixed may be achieved .
we shall restrict our attention here to finite - level quantum systems with @xmath16 discrete energy levels .
the pure quantum states of the system are represented by normalized wavefunctions @xmath17 , which form a hilbert space @xmath18 .
however , the state of a quantum system need not be represented by a pure state @xmath19 .
for instance , we may consider a system consisting of a large number of identical , non - interacting particles , which can be in different internal quantum states , i.e. , a certain fraction @xmath20 of the particles may be in quantum state @xmath21 , another fraction @xmath22 may be in another state @xmath23 and so forth .
hence , the state of the system as a whole is described by a discrete ensemble of quantum states @xmath24 with non - negative weights @xmath25 that sum up to one .
such an ensemble of quantum states is called a _ mixed - state _ , and it can be represented by a density operator @xmath26 on @xmath18 with the spectral representation @xmath27 where @xmath28 is an orthonormal set of vectors in @xmath18 that forms an ensemble of independent pure quantum states .
the evolution of @xmath29 is governed by @xmath30 with @xmath31 as above .
clearly if _ all _ the unitary operators can be generated we have the optimal situation , complete controllability .
however , classical lie group theory tells us that even when we only obtain a subalgebra of @xmath12 we can obtain pure state controllability .
the results arise from consideration@xcite of the transitive action of lie groups on the sphere @xmath32 .
the classical `` orthogonal '' groups @xmath33 where the field @xmath34 is either the reals @xmath35 , the complexes @xmath36 or the quaternions @xmath37 , are defined to be those that keep invariant the length of the vector @xmath38 ; the squared length is given by @xmath39 , where @xmath40 refers to the appropriate conjugation .
these compact groups are , essentially , the only ones which give transitive actions on the appropriate spheres , as follows : @xmath41 transitive on @xmath42 @xmath43 transitive on @xmath44 @xmath45 transitive on @xmath46 .
since we may regard our pure state as a normalized vector in @xmath47 and thus as a point on @xmath48 , we obtain pure state controllability only for @xmath49 ( or @xmath50 if we are not too fussy about phases ) and @xmath51 , the latter for even @xmath16 only .
( note that we can not get @xmath52 as a subalgebra of @xmath49 . )
complete controllability is clearly a stronger condition than pure state controllability . to illustrate our theme of the limitations on quantum control , we now give two examples based on a truncated oscillator with nearest - level interactions for which the algebras generated are @xmath53 and @xmath54
both these examples are generic .
consider a three - level system with energy levels @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 and assume the interaction with an external field @xmath58 is of dipole form with nearest neighbor interactions only .
then we have @xmath59 , where the matrix representations of @xmath1 and @xmath60 are @xmath61 , \quad { h}_1 = \left[\begin{array}{ccc } 0 & d_1 & 0 \\ d_1 & 0 & d_2 \\ 0 & d_2 & 0 \end{array}\right].\ ] ] if the energy levels are equally spaced , i.e. , @xmath62 and the transition dipole moments are equal , i.e. , @xmath63 then we have @xmath64 , \quad { h}_1 = d \left[\begin{array}{ccc } 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{array}\right]\ ] ] where @xmath65 is the traceless part of @xmath1 .
both @xmath66 and @xmath67 satisfy @xmath68 where @xmath69\ ] ] which is a defining relation for @xmath70 .
the dynamical lie algebra in this case is in fact @xmath70 .
it is easy to show that the matrix @xmath71 is a real anti - symmetric representation of @xmath70 if @xmath72 .
explicitly , a suitable unitary matrix is given by @xmath73.\ ] ] since the dynamical algebra and group in the basis determined by @xmath7 consists of _ real _ matrices , real states can only be transformed to real states ; this means that for any initial state there is a large class of unreachable states .
this example is generic as it applies to @xmath16-level systems , although for even @xmath16 we need other than dipole interactions to generate @xmath53 .
the analogous dipole interaction generates @xmath54 in the even @xmath16 case , as we now illustrate .
consider a four - level system with hamiltonian @xmath59 , @xmath74 and @xmath75 note that @xmath76 and @xmath77 satisfy @xmath78 for @xmath79 where @xmath80 is unitarily equivalent to @xmath81 which is a defining relation for @xmath54 .
consider an initial state of the form @xmath82 where @xmath83 satisfies ( [ eq : sp ] ) , it can only evolve into states @xmath84 where @xmath85 satisfies ( [ eq : sp ] ) , under the action of a unitary evolution operator in exponential image of @xmath11 .
hence , any target state that is not of the form ( [ eq : rho_1 ] ) is not accessible from the initial state ( [ eq : rho_0 ] ) .
note that the initial state @xmath86 is of the form @xmath87 and that @xmath88 satisfies ( [ eq : sp ] ) . consider the target state @xmath89 which is clearly kinematically admissible since @xmath90 but note that @xmath91 and @xmath92 does not satisfy ( [ eq : sp ] ) .
hence , @xmath93 is not dynamically accessible from @xmath94 for this system . given a target state @xmath93 that is not dynamically accessible from an initial state @xmath94 , we can easily construct observables whose kinematical upper bound for its expectation value can not be reached dynamically .
simply consider @xmath95 .
the expectation value of @xmath96 assumes its kinematical maximum only when the system is in state @xmath93 .
since @xmath93 is not reachable , the kinematical upper bound is not dynamically realizable .
in this short introduction to quantum control theory , we have described the goals of the subject briefly , and then illustrated the limitations by generic examples where complete control is not possible .
the tools we have used are , in the main , those of classical lie group theory .
theoretical problems that remain to be tackled include to what extent these non - controllable systems can , in fact , be controlled ; and , of course , the paramount problem of implementing these controls in practice .
it gives us great pleasure to acknowledge many conversations with colleagues , including drs .
hongchen fu and gabriel turinici .
a.i.s would also like to thank the laboratoire de physique thorique des liquides , of the university of paris vi , for hospitality during the writing of this note . | objectives of quantum control manipulate time evolution quantum system drive initial state to final state target state optimize expectation value of target observable applications are quantum computing start procedure with initial state problems population levels in atomic systems laser cooling of mathematical tools for control diverse algebraic group theoretic topological methods questions include when is quantum system completely controllable ? if not how optimization ? how near to target state for not completely controllable system ? answer first depends on knowledge lie algebra system s quantum hamiltonian second from properties lie group structure last involves ideas topology lie group theory large corpus of classical mathematics can answers to questions quantum control for pure state controllability _ classical lie group theory given basic results quantum control system is form @xmath0 @xmath1 is internal hamiltonian @xmath2 are interaction terms with external field dynamical evolution governed by unitary evolution operator @xmath3 satisfies schrodinger equation @xmath4 with initial condition @xmath5 @xmath6 is identity operator solution @xmath7 involves all commutators of @xmath8 operators @xmath8 @xmath9 hermitian skew - hermitian counterparts @xmath10 generate lie algebra @xmath11 dynamical lie algebra of control system subalgebra of @xmath12 or @xmath13 degree controllability determined by dynamical lie algebra control system hamiltonian @xmath14 if @xmath15 unitary operators generated system completely controllable common quantum systems completely controllable @xcite cases arise when @xmath11 subalgebra of @xmath12 systems exhibit pure state controllability target pure state obtained controllable when all states pure or mixed achieved attention to finite - level quantum systems with @xmath16 discrete energy levels pure quantum states represented by normalized wavefunctions @xmath17 form hilbert space @xmath18 state need not be represented by pure state @xmath19 system identical non - interacting particles in different internal quantum states fraction @xmath20 in state @xmath21 @xmath23 state system described by discrete quantum states @xmath24 with non - negative weights @xmath25 up to one ensemble quantum states mixed - state represented by density operator @xmath26 on @xmath18 spectral representation @xmath27 @xmath28 orthonormal vectors in @xmath18 independent pure quantum states evolution of @xmath29 governed by @xmath30 @xmath31 if unitary operators generated optimal complete controllability classical lie group theory subalgebra of @xmath12 pure state controllability results from transitive action of lie groups on sphere @xmath32 classical orthogonal groups @xmath33 field @xmath34 reals complexes quaternions @xmath37 keep invariant length of vector @xmath38 length given by @xmath39 @xmath40 refers to appropriate conjugation compact groups give transitive actions on spheres @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 pure state normalized vector in @xmath47 point on @xmath48 pure state controllability for @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath16 get @xmath52 as subalgebra of @xmath49 complete controllability stronger than pure state controllabilityillustrate limitations on quantum control two examples truncated oscillator nearest - level interactions algebras @xmath53 and @xmath54 generic consider three - level system energy levels @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 assume interaction with external field @xmath58 dipole form nearest neighbor interactions only @xmath59 matrix representations of @xmath1 and @xmath60 are @xmath61 }_1_2 if energy levels equally spaced @xmath62 transition dipole moments equal @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 traceless part of @xmath1 @xmath66 and @xmath67 satisfy @xmath68 @xmath69 defining relation for @xmath70 dynamical lie algebra is @xmath70 matrix @xmath71 is real anti - symmetric representation of @xmath70 if @xmath72 suitable unitary matrix given by @xmath73. dynamical algebra group basis determined by @xmath7 consists of real _ matrices real states be transformed to real states initial large class of unreachable states example applies to @xmath16-level systems dipole interactions generate @xmath53 analogous dipole interaction generates @xmath54 four - level system with hamiltonian @xmath59 @xmath76 satisfy @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 equivalent to @xmath81 defining relation for @xmath54 initial state @xmath82 @xmath83 satisfies sp evolve into states @xmath84 @xmath85 satisfies unitary evolution operator @xmath11 target state not form eq : rho_1 not accessible from initial state : rho_0 initial state @xmath86 form @xmath87 @xmath88 satisfies [ eq : sp ] ) target state @xmath89 kinematically admissible since @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 satisfy eq : sp ] @xmath93 not dynamically accessible from @xmath94 target state @xmath93 not accessible from @xmath94 construct observables kinematical upper bound expectation reached consider @xmath95 expectation value @xmath96 assumes maximum state @xmath93 @xmath93 not reachable kinematical upper bound not dynamically realizableshort introduction to quantum control theory described goals illustrated limitations by generic examples where complete control not possible tools used classical lie group theory theoretical problems include non - controllable systems be controlled paramount problem implementing controls in practice acknowledge conversations with colleagues including drs . hongchen fu gabriel turinici thank laboratoire de physique thorique des liquides university of paris vi for hospitality writing note | 0.350017 | 2,338 | 1,213 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,568 | we present first results from a numerical investigation of a @xmath0 symmetric model based on dimensional reduction . | in this note we will describe some of the properties of a @xmath0 symmetric generalization of dimensional reduction , applied to @xmath1 gauge theory in @xmath2 dimension .
the motivation is to construct an effective action , which is constrained by perturbative dimensional reduction at high temperature , but which can be applied all the way down to the confinement phase transition .
the partition function is defined as follows : @xmath3\text{d}[v]\exp\bigl(-s_{eff}\bigr)\\ s_{eff}&=s_u+s_{u , v}+s_v \end{split}\ ] ] @xmath4 the @xmath1 matrices @xmath5 and @xmath6 are defined on the sites and the links respectively of a two dimensional lattice .
the matrices @xmath7 represent the polyakov loops of the full @xmath8 theory .
similar models have been proposed in @xcite .
here we discuss the phase structure of the above model , and compare with results obtained within the standard reduction recipes @xcite .
for simplicity we set @xmath9 and discuss the phase structure in the @xmath10 plane .
the number @xmath11 of time slices in ( 2 + 1)d , which enters as a parameter in @xmath12 is fixed to 4 throughout this paper .
the model was studied using conventional lattice qcd monte - carlo techniques .
the multi hit metropolis algorithm was used both for updating the gauge fields @xmath13 and polyakov loops fields @xmath7 .
lattices of sizes ranging from @xmath14 to @xmath15 were studied .
the main quantities measured were the traces of polyakov loops @xmath16 and their two point correlators .
we started with simulations at @xmath17 for a range of @xmath18 values and got the expected signal of the phase transition between the low - temperature confined @xmath19 symmetric phase ( ia ) and a broken high temperature phase ( ii ) .
screening masses @xmath20 were obtained by fitting the two point polyakov loop unconnected correlators with the formula @xmath21 we plot the result of the fit in figure [ fig : massnp ] . on the same plot
we show the results obtained in @xcite with the naively reduced model ( no higgs potential ) . at sufficiently large temperature ( large @xmath18 ) the agreement is good , but the @xmath0 symmetric model also describes the vanishing of the screening mass associated with @xmath0 restoration at lower temperatures .
we then performed a series of scans in the @xmath18@xmath23 plane on @xmath14 lattices and looked for peaks in the susceptibility @xmath24 as indications of phase transitions , while the associated distributions of @xmath25 were used to characterize the phases .
after so identifying a tentative phase diagram ( see figure [ fig : pd ] ) , one sees a strong transition signal just above @xmath27 . there the size dependence of @xmath28 at its maximum , as well as the time history of @xmath29 and its doubly peaked histogram clearly indicate that the transition is first order .
the evidence for a second phase transition , slightly above @xmath30 is considerably weaker .
the peak is less pronounced and we had to go to @xmath15 lattices ( with much poorer statistics ) to make sure that it grows with the lattice size . in order to study the nature of the phases , we looked at the distributions of the polyakov loops @xmath25 .
the regions marked ia and ii on figure [ fig : pd ] are easily identified with standard @xmath19 symmetric and broken phases , with data concentrated respectively around @xmath31 and @xmath32 . at larger @xmath23 in region iii ,
a new pattern shows up , with again @xmath0 breaking peaks , but the argument of @xmath25 is now close to @xmath33 , as illustrated on figure [ fig : hist ] . finally ,
when @xmath23 is further increased ( region ib ) , the histogram is located around @xmath34 , no particular argument is selected , and we conjecture that the phase is the same as the low temperature confined one ( ia ) .
along @xmath26 , we have used the projected ( 0momentum ) correlators to extract the masses , by fitting them to the formula : @xmath37 our results are summarized in figure [ fig : mass ] .
the mass value is found to coincide with that measured at @xmath26 , @xmath38 in the original(2 + 1 ) model @xcite for @xmath23 close to 0.2 .
this point in parameter space is a stable point of the phase diagram , at variance with what happens in the conventionally reduced model , where the physical situation corresponds to a metastable point @xcite . in conclusion ,
the @xmath0 symmetric model opens a possibility to extend dimensional reduction down to the temperature where confinement is restored .
it exhibits an interesting phase diagram , with a new phase whose connection to qcd at finite temperature and/or chemical potential should be investigated . for this purpose ,
a study to constrain the model parameters is under way .
r. d. pisarski , phys .
d * 62 * , 111501 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0006205 ] .
p. bialas , a. morel , b. petersson , k. petrov and t. reisz , nucl .
b * 581 * ( 2000 ) 477 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0003004 ] .
p. bialas , a. morel , b. petersson , k. petrov and t. reisz , nucl .
b * 603 * , 369 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - lat/0012019 ] . | properties @xmath0 symmetric generalization dimensional reduction applied @xmath1 gauge theory @xmath2 dimension motivation construct effective action constrained by dimensional reduction high temperature applied confinement phase transition partition function defined @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath1 matrices defined sites links two dimensional lattice matrices @xmath7 represent polyakov loops @xmath8 theory similar models proposed in @xcite discuss phase structure compare results standard reduction recipes set @xmath9 discuss phase structure @xmath10 plane number @xmath11 time slices ( 2 + 1)d parameter @xmath12 fixed to 4 model studied conventional lattice qcd monte - carlo techniques multi hit metropolis algorithm updating gauge fields polyakov loops fields lattices sizes @xmath14 to @xmath15 studied main quantities measured traces of polyakov loops @xmath16 two point correlators started simulations @xmath17 @xmath18 values expected signal phase transition between low - temperature confined @xmath19 symmetric phase high temperature phasescreening masses @xmath20 obtained fitting two point polyakov loop correlators with formula @xmath21 result in figure results @xcite reduced model no higgs potential large temperature @xmath18 agreement good @xmath0 symmetric model describes vanishing screening mass restoration at lower temperatures performed scans in @xmath18@xmath23 plane on @xmath14 lattices looked for peaks in susceptibility @xmath24 phase transitions distributions @xmath25 characterize phases phase diagram strong transition signal above @xmath27 size dependence of @xmath28 maximum time history of @xmath29 doubly peaked histogram indicate transition first order evidence second phase transition above @xmath30 weaker peak less pronounced @xmath15 lattices poorer statistics with lattice size study phases looked distributions polyakov loops @xmath25 regions marked ia and ii figure identified with standard @xmath19 symmetric broken phases data concentrated around @xmath31 and @xmath32 larger @xmath23 in region iii new pattern @xmath0 breaking peaks argument of @xmath25 close to @xmath33 illustrated figure@xmath23 increased region ib histogram around @xmath34 no argument selected conjecture phase same as low temperature confined one @xmath26 used projected 0momentum correlators extract masses formula @xmath37 results summarized in figure mass mass value with @xmath26 @xmath38 original(2 + 1 ) model @xcite @xmath23 close to 0.2 stable point phase diagram variance conventionally reduced model metastable point @xcite @xmath0 symmetric model dimensional reduction temperature confinement restored interesting phase diagram new phase connection to qcd at finite temperature chemical potential study to constrain model parameters under way pisarski phys . d * 62 *, 111501 ( 2000 ) arxiv hep - ph/0006205 p. bialas a. morel b. petersson k. petrov t. reisz nucl . b * 581 * ( 2000 ) 477 hep - lat/0003004 * 603 369 ( 2001 ) hep - lat/0012019 | 0.185312 | 1,279 | 647 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,576 | we employ qcd sum rules to calculate the @xmath0 form factors and coupling constant by studying the three - point @xmath1 correlation function .
we find that the momentum dependence of the form factor depends on the off - shell meson .
we get a value for the coupling which is in agreement with estimates based on constituent quark model .
hadrons are composites of the underlying quarks whose effective fields describe point - like physics only when all the interacting particles are on mass - shell . when at least one of the particles in a vertex is off - shell , the finite size effects of the hadrons become important .
therefore , the knowledge of the form factors in hadronic vertices is of crucial importance to estimate any hadronic amplitude using hadronic degrees of freedom .
this work is devoted to the study of the @xmath1 form factor , which is important , for instance , in the evaluation of the dissociation cross section of @xmath2 by pions and @xmath3 mesons using effective lagrangians @xcite . since a decrease of @xmath2 production in heavy ions collisions might signal the formation of a quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) @xcite , a precise evaluation of the background , i.e. , conventional @xmath2 absorption by co - moving pions and @xmath3 mesons , is of fundamental importance .
the @xmath1 coupling has been studied by some authors using different approaches : vector meson dominance model plus relativistic potential model @xcite and constituent quark meson model @xcite .
unfortunately , the numerical results from these calculations may differ by almost a factor two .
the relevance of this difference can not be underestimated since the cross section is proportional to the square of the coupling constants . in ref . @xcite it was shown that the use of different coupling constants and form factors can lead to cross sections that differ by more than one order of magnitude , and that can even have a different behavior as a function of @xmath4 . in previous works
we have used the qcd sum rules ( qcdsr ) to study the @xmath5 @xcite , @xmath6 @xcite and @xmath7 @xcite form factors , considering two different mesons off mass - shell . in these
works the qcdsr results for the form factors were parametrized by analytical forms such that the respective extrapolations at the off - shell meson poles provided consistent values for the corresponding coupling constant . in this work
we use the qcdsr approach to evaluate the @xmath1 form factors and use the same procedure described above to estimate the @xmath1 coupling constant . the three - point function associated with a @xmath8 vertex ( see fig . 1 ) , where @xmath9 and @xmath10 are the incoming and outgoing external mesons respectively and @xmath11 is the off - shell meson , is given by _
( p,)&=&d^4x d^4y e^ip^.x e^-i(-p).y + & & 0|t\{j_3(x ) j^_2(y)j^_1(0)}|0 , [ cor ] where @xmath12 is the interpolating field for @xmath13 . for @xmath2 , @xmath14 and @xmath15 mesons
the interpolating fields are respectively @xmath16 , @xmath17 and @xmath18 with @xmath19 and @xmath20 being a light quark and the charm quark fields .
the phenomenological side of the vertex function , @xmath21 , is obtained by the consideration of @xmath9 and @xmath10 state contribution to the matrix element in eq .
( [ cor ] ) : _ ^(phen)(p,)=1p^2-m_1 ^ 21 ^ 2-m_3 ^ 2 0|j_3|h_3 ( ) + h_3()|j^_2|h_1(p)h_1(p)| j^_1|0 + , [ phe1 ] where h. r. means higher resonances .
the matrix element of the current @xmath22 defines the vertex function @xmath23 : h_3()|j^_2|h_1(p)=h_2(q)|j^_2|0 , [ for ] where @xmath24 .
calling @xmath25 and @xmath26 the four momentum of @xmath27 and @xmath15 respectively one has v^(p_1,p_2,p_3)=g_dd*(q^2 ) ^_^(p_1 ) _ ^(p_2)p_3p_2 .
[ ver ] the vacuum to meson transition amplitudes appearing in eqs .
( [ phe1 ] ) and ( [ for ] ) are given in terms of the corresponding meson decay constants @xmath28 by 0|j^(d)|d = m_d^2f_dm_c , [ fd ] and v(p,)|j^_|0=m_vf_v^ * _ , [ fv ] for the vector meson @xmath29 or @xmath30 .
therefore , using eqs .
( [ for ] ) , ( [ ver ] ) , ( [ fd ] ) and ( [ fv ] ) in eq .
( [ phe1 ] ) we get _
^(phen)(p,)&=&cg_dd*(q^2 ) _ p^^(q^2-m_2
^ 2)(p^2-m_1 ^ 2)(^2-m_3 ^ 2 ) + & + & , [ phen ] where c = m_d^2m_d^*m_f_df_d^*f_m_c .
[ chh ] the contribution of higher resonances and continuum in eq .
( [ phen ] ) will be taken into account as usual in the standard form of ref .
@xcite .
the qcd side , or theoretical side , of the vertex function is evaluated by performing wilson s operator product expansion ( ope ) of the operator in eq .
( [ cor ] ) .
writing @xmath31 in terms of the invariant amplitude : _
( p,)=(p^2,^2,q^2)_p^^ , we can write a double dispersion relation for @xmath32 , over the virtualities @xmath33 and @xmath34 holding @xmath35 fixed : ( p^2,^2,q^2)=-14 ^ 2ds du ( s , u , q^2)(s - p^2)(u-^2 ) , [ dis ] where @xmath36 equals the double discontinuity of the amplitude @xmath37 on the cuts @xmath38 , @xmath39 , with @xmath40 in the case of off - shell @xmath14 or @xmath15 and @xmath41 in the case of off - shell @xmath2 . we consider diagrams up to dimension three which include the perturbative diagram and the quark condensate . to improve the matching between the two sides of the sum rules ,
we perform a double borel transformation in both variables @xmath42 and @xmath43 we get one sum rule for each meson considered off - shell . calling @xmath44 the @xmath45 form factor for the off - shell meson @xmath46 , we get the following sum rules : c e^- e^- = _ 4m^2^s_0 _ u_min^u_0 dsdu ^(d)(u , s , t)e^-e^-(u_max - u ) , [ ffd ] c e^- e^- = _ 4m^2^s_0 _ u_min^u_0 dsdu ^(d^*)(u , s , t)e^-e^-(u_max - u ) , [ ffds ] and c e^- e^- = _ m^2^s_0 _ u_min^u_0 dsdu ^(j/)(u , s , t)e^-e^-(u_max - u ) , [ ffpsi ] with @xmath47 , ^(d)(u , s , t)=^(d^*)(u , s , t)= ( 1 + ) , @xmath48 , @xmath49 and u^max_min= , in the case of off - shell @xmath15 or @xmath14 . in the case of an off - shell @xmath2 we get : ^(j/)(u , s , t)= -4 ^ 2<|qq>(s - m_c^2)(u - m_c^2 ) , and u^max_min= . in the eqs .
( [ ffd ] ) , ( [ ffds ] ) and ( [ ffpsi ] ) we have transferred to the qcd side the higher resonances contributions through the introduction of the continuum thresholds @xmath50 and @xmath51 .
the parameter values used in all calculations are @xmath52 , @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 , @xmath59 .
the continuum thresholds for the sum rules are @xmath60 and @xmath61 with @xmath62 .
we first discuss the @xmath0 form factor with an off - shell @xmath15 meson . in fig .
2 we show the behavior of the form factor @xmath63 at @xmath64 and @xmath65 , as a function of the borel mass @xmath66 using @xmath67 .
we can see that the qcdsr results are rather stable in the interval @xmath68 . in fig .
3 we show @xmath69 as a function of @xmath66 and @xmath70 . from fig .
3 we see that the stability is still good even considering the two independent borel parameters .
the same kind of stability is obtained for other values of @xmath71 and for the other two form factors .
fixing @xmath72 and @xmath73 we show , in fig . 4 , the momentum dependence of the qcdsr results for the form factors @xmath74 , @xmath75 and @xmath76 through the circles , squares and triangles respectively . since the present approach can not be used at @xmath77 , to extract the @xmath78 coupling from the form factors we need to extrapolate the curve to @xmath79 : the mass of the off - shell meson .
in order to do this extrapolation we fit the qcdsr results with an analytical expression .
we tried to fit our results with a mono - pole form , since this is very often used for form factors , but the fit was only good for @xmath80 . for @xmath74 and @xmath75
we obtained good fits using a gaussian form .
we get : g^(j/)_dd^*(q^2)= , [ papsi ] g^(d^*)_dd^*(q^2)= 19.9 , [ pads ] g^(d)_dd^*(q^2)= 12.7 .
[ pad ] these fits are also shown in fig . 4 through the dotted , dashed and solid lines respectively .
from fig . 4 we see that all three form factors lead to compatible values for the coupling constant when the form factors are extrapolated to the off - shell meson mass ( shown as open circles in fig . 4 )
considering the uncertainties in the continuum threshold , and the difference in the values of the coupling constants extracted when the @xmath15 , @xmath14 or @xmath2 mesons are off - shell , our result for the @xmath0 coupling constant is : g_dd^*=(3.48 0.76)^-1 .
[ fi ] in table i we show the results obtained for the same coupling constant using different approaches.in refs .
@xcite and @xcite .
[ cols="^,^,^ " , ] values of the coupling constant @xmath81 in @xmath82 evaluated using different approaches .
while our result is compatible with the coupling obtained using constituent quark meson model @xcite , it is half of the value obtained with the vector meson dominance model plus relativistic potential model @xcite .
to summarize : we have used the method of qcd sum rules to compute form factors and coupling constant in the @xmath83 vertex .
our results for the coupling show once more that this method is robust , yielding numbers which are approximately the same regardless of which particle we choose to be off - shell and depending weakly on the choice of the continuum threshold . as for the form factors ,
we obtain a harder ( softer ) form factor when the off - shell particle is heavier ( lighter ) . | this work was supported by cnpq and fapesp .
navarra , m. nielsen , m.e .
bracco , m. chiapparini and c.l .
schat , phys . lett . *
b489 * , 319 ( 2000 ) .
navarra , m. nielsen , m.e .
bracco , phys . rev . *
d65 * , 037502 ( 2002 ) .
matheus , f.s .
navarra , m. nielsen and r. rodrigues da silva , phys . lett . *
b541 * , 265 ( 2002 ) . | work cnpq fapesp navarra nielsen bracco chiapparini schat phys . lett b489 319 ( 2000 ) navarra nielsen bracco . rev d65 037502 ( 2002 ) matheus navarra nielsen rodrigues da silva . lett b541 265 ( 2002 ) | 0.066828 | 141 | 74 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,579 | we propose a controllable way of tuning fano resonances in open quantum dots in the absence of magnetic field .
a quantum dot can be modified by changing the gate voltages that define the dot itself .
an extra degree of freedom can be introduced by means of a controllable repulsive perturbation , such as the one induced by scanning a atomic force microscope tip on a real sample .
we numerically investigate the coupling between localized states in the dot and the continuum in the leads .
the advantage of such position controllable perturbation is the selective manipulation of the quantum dot states .
we show that this could be a feasible alternative to quantum dots in aharonov - bohm interferometers as a fano resonance tuning device .
pacs number(s ) 73.40.gk,73.21.fg,73.21.la in the past few years , mesoscopic systems became appropriate tools for investigating wave function interference effects .
the nanometer - scale technology turned into reality structures with dimensions that are smaller than the phase coherence length .
the prototype are systems created in a two - dimensional high - mobility electron gas ( 2deg ) at the interface of a gaas / algaas heterostructure structured by means of the split gates technique @xcite .
two important examples should be mentioned here : the quantum point contact ( qpc ) , where conductance quantization has been seen @xcite ; and the quantum dot ( qd ) , with a wide range of interesting transport properties @xcite .
starting from these two devices , systems of greater complexity have been conceived and fabricated for controling electronic wave function interference effects .
a recent example of such effort is the imaging of the coherent electron flow through qpc , where the interference effects can be controlled by scanning an atomic force microscope ( afm ) tip over the sample @xcite .
another example , related to the present work is the tunable fano resonance in an aharonov - bohm interferometer with an embebed qd @xcite .
we propose that fano resonances could be completely tunable in open quantum dot ( oqd ) structures by moving a local perturbation across the system , like a tip of an afm . indeed
such a procedure enables a selective manipulation of the qd states . up to now , in absence of magnetic fields , fano resonances have been only partially tuned by changing gate voltages in single - electron transistors .
@xcite . in the present approach
, a continuous system is discretized into a lattice , considering a single @xmath0-like orbital per site and only nearest - neighbour hopping elements .
the oqd structure , emulated by a tight - binding lattice model is depicted in fig.1(a ) .
the black circle represent a potential columm simulating the perturbation induced , for instance , by an afm tip located on the sample at that position . in what follows we consider perturbations of a single host lattice site ( @xmath1 ) , which corresponds to a extension relative to the quantum dot of @xmath1/@xmath2=1/49 for oqd with dimensions @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is the host lattice parameter ( fig.1(a ) ) .
the repulsive perturbation will be characterized by a height @xmath5 in the range between @xmath6 mev and @xmath7 ev .
the tight - binding hopping parameters are chosen in order to emulate the electronic effective mass for the gaas bottom of the conduction band , @xmath8 .
hence , @xmath9 , @xmath10 ev for a lattice parameter of @xmath11 .
such parametrization represents quantum dots with lateral sizes up to @xmath12 , at least one order of magnitude lower than the typical dimensions of actual quantum dots constructed by litographic methods .
however , the present work has the proposal of illustrating a selective manipulation of confined states . here
the relevant energy scale is @xmath13 ev . for systems ten times larger , the new energy scale would be of the order of @xmath14 mev , still accessible for available temperatures .
another relevant scale is the ratio between the extension of the perturbative spike and the dot dimension , @xmath15 .
a previous work @xcite suggests that the energy shifts are qualitatively insensitive to this ratio if the perturbation height , @xmath5 , is less than @xmath16 .
the afm tip can also be seen as a controllable impurity in a quantum dot and therefore a simple tunable experimental realization of a multiply connected nanostructure @xcite .
we will interested in the transmission probabilities and local density of states ( ldos ) , which are obtained by means of green s functions approaches . for the ldos we follow a self - energy method
@xcite , the total hamiltonian , @xmath17 , is a sum of four terms : the dot connected to the two point contacts regions , described by the @xmath18 , the left and rigth contact regions , @xmath19 and @xmath20 , respectively ; as well as the coupling term between the contacts and the dot structure , @xmath21 : @xmath22 where @xmath23 describes the interaction between device and contacts .
the corresponding green s function is given by @xmath24 we define the green s functions for the isolated contacts : @xmath25 using equation ( 1 ) in ( 2 ) we obtain : @xmath26 the greens function of the device , @xmath27 , result in @xmath28 where @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the so called self - energies which describe the effects of the leads on the device .
the propagators in the transverse mode representation for the isolated contacts , @xmath31 are : @xmath32 with @xmath33\ ] ] the matrix elements of the unitary transformation matrix , @xmath34 , which transforms the greens function from site to transverse mode representation ( @xmath35 ) are : @xmath36 where n ( transverse site ) and @xmath37 ( transverse mode ) are row and columm indexes of the @xmath34 matrix , respectively .
the @xmath38 , @xmath23 , @xmath39 and @xmath34 are @xmath40x@xmath40 matrices , where @xmath40 is the number of transverse sites . using equation ( 5 ) we obtain the ldos : @xmath41\ ] ] where m is the longitudinal site .
this ldos is proportional to the probability density of a state of energy e. finally , a green s function is related to the conductance by the landauer - bttiker formula @xcite , by means of a recursive solution of the dyson equation as discussed elsewhere @xcite .
we can control the coupling of oqd bound states to the two dimensional reservoirs by changing the width , @xmath42 , of the left and right qpcs , fig .
1(a ) transmission probabilities as a function of the incident electron energy are shown in fig .
1(b ) . for @xmath43 , ( continuous line )
we clearly see resonances in the transmission probability due to the bound states of the oqd , as well as the first conductance plateau . for wider leads , @xmath44 , ( dashed line ) we see the resonances due to oqd states shifted to lower energies , since the effective confinement is diminished with the widening of the contacts . moreover the resonance peaks are broadened because the coupling to the reservoirs is enhanced .
as expected , the conductance plateaus are also shifted to lower energies and the onset of a second plateau can be seen in the same energy range .
two aspects related to widening the leads should be kept in mind ; ( i ) the shift in energy and broadening of the resonances are not a monotonous function of the energy ; and ( ii ) , even the shape of a resonance may the qualitatively changed , as can be seen for the antiresonance for @xmath43 changing into a peak for @xmath44 .
the previous paragraph summarizes the effects on the conductance that can be achieved by varying ( symmetrically ) the leads , i.e , the voltages of the gate electrodes that actually define the quantum dot structure . in
what follows we will be interested in effects due to a new degree of freedom in the manipulation of the dot states , as well as the coupling between them and the continua of states in the leads .
such new mechanism is introduced by a local potential perturbation that can be moved across the sample , like an afm tip , as suggested above .
the novelty of this local perturbation is that the resonances may be selectively tuned , exploring the wave function symmetries of the states . in order to explore the wave function symmetries , one has to look systematically along three symmetry axis for the present case of a square qd : along the axis connecting the leads ( x axis ) , the axis perpendicular to the line joining the leads and crossing the center of the dot ( y axis ) , and a diagonal , also crossing the center , as indicated in the sketch shown in fig .
1(a ) .
the shift in energy of a certain resonance peak depends on the position of the local perturbation , since such shift is proportional to the wave function amplitude at this position @xcite : @xmath45 where @xmath46 , is the unperturbed energy of state @xmath47 , @xmath21 is the effective perturbative potential , and @xmath48 is the probability density of the unperturbed state .
hence , a mapping of the probability density related to a resonance peak can be obtained by a contour plot of the energy shifts as a function of the perturbation position @xcite .
here we are interested not necessarily in wave function mapping , but in the related selective tuning of the resonances .
fig .
1(c ) shows contour plots of the ldos at the energies of the 4 resonances and the anti - resonance shown in fig .
1(b ) for the @xmath43 wide leads case ( continuous line ) .
the last pannel is for an energy sligthly above the anti - resonance .
having these contour plots in mind it is straightforward to see that the width of the resonance peak is proportional to the wave function amplitude ( ldos ) leaking into the leads .
of particular interest is the strong localization of the fifth state , which correspond to the anti - resonance in fig .
1(b ) , as well as the clear 1d channel character at off resonance energies in the conductance plateau , @xmath49 , fig .
1(c ) . within this framework illustrated by fig .
1 we are able to understand the effects of the position dependent perturbation . in this sense ,
two important effects are shown in fig.2 .
first , for a perturbative spike positioned at the center of the quantum dot , fig.2(a ) , we see the selective shift of the resonances in the perturbed system with @xmath50 ev(continuous line ) compared to the unperturbed one ( dashed line ) .
we clearly identify that important shifts ( for the lowest resonance and the anti - resonance ) occur only for those states with significant amplitude at the center of the dot .
next , for a perturbation @xmath51 ev placed at one of the leads ( continuous line ) , fig .
2(b ) , no energy shifts of the resonances are observed . on the other hand ,
a strong suppression of the conductance plateau can be observed , an effect which has been used recently for imaging the electron flow through quantum point contacts @xcite .
the dependence of the selective resonance shifts on the wave function symmetries for moving the perturbative spike along the y axis can be analyzed by comparying fig .
2(a ) and fig .
2(c ) .
now , for @xmath52 ev ( continuous line ) and @xmath53ev ( dashed line ) , the second resonance remains almost unchanged and the lowest one is shifted , as expected from the ldos in fig .
1(c ) .
having the ldos at the resonance energies in mind , it is also expected that the third resonance would be perturbed in this situation and , indeed , this resonance is not only shifted in energy but the line shape changes into a fano - like form . here
the shift in energy affects dramatically the coupling with the continua in the leads and therefore the line shape change in the transmission probability . moving the perturbation further away from the center in the y direction , fig .
2(d ) , this third resonance evolves towards a symmetric peak again ( continuous line for @xmath54ev ) , illustrating the tunability of a specific resonance with a controllable perturbation .
the symmetry of the localized states in the qd give rise to two new consequences when the perturbation is moved along the diagonal , fig .
3 . here dashed and continuous line are for perturbative spikes at the center and at the diagonal , respectively .
both situations are for @xmath55 ev .
first , we observe the inversion of the fano resonance associated to @xmath56 @xcite : from fig .
2 ( c ) to fig .
3 , the peak position is reversed .
moreover , only an off center perturbation along the diagonal breaks the symmetry of the @xmath57 state , allowing the coupling with the 1d channel and leading to a fano resonance .
this symmetry is not broken with the perturbation positioned along the other symmetry axis ( x and y ) , since the ldos related to @xmath57 is negligible there . in summary
, we propose that scanning an afm across an open quantum dot could be an efficient tool for a selective manipulation of quantum states .
the local perturbation induced by the tip is an important new degree of freedom in order to explore and modify resonant states . as an example , we show that the coupling of a specific level with the continuum can be tuned over a wide range in which the line shape of the associated resonance in the conductance changes from a symmetric peak into a asymmetric fano resonance , which can be inverted or tuned back into a single peak .
this effect suggests an interesting alternative to quantum dots in aharonov - bohm interferometers @xcite as a fano resonance tuning device . | m. mendoza would like to acknowledge the brazilian agency capes for financial support , while p.a.s .
is grateful to the continuous support provided by fapesp . | mendoza acknowledge brazilian agency financial support p.a.s . grateful continuous support fapesp | 0.06368 | 36 | 18 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,584 | we present results on the static potential , and torelon and glueball masses from simulations of qcd with two flavours of dynamical wilson fermions on @xmath0 and @xmath1 lattices at @xmath2 . | the present simulations have been performed at various @xmath3 values and lattice volumes at @xmath2 ( table [ tab1 ] ) .
the effective lattice resolution ranges from @xmath4 gev ( @xmath5 ) down to @xmath6 gev ( @xmath7 ) while the ratio @xmath8 varies from 0.83 to 0.55 , corresponding to sea quarks that are slightly heavier than the strange quark and of about one quarter of its mass , respectively .
in addition , results from quenched reference simulations at @xmath9 ( @xmath10 gev ) and @xmath11 ( @xmath12 gev ) are presented .
-.6 cm ? =
? .simulation parameters . [ cols="<,>,>,>,>",options="header " , ] -.7 cm -.15 cm = 7.5 cm -1.2 cm in quenched simulations , finite size effects on the scalar glueball are small @xcite as long as @xmath13 where @xmath14 denotes the torelon mass .
when including sea quarks , the glueball might break up and decay into a single torelon @xcite through an intermediate mesonic state .
the expected torelon masses @xmath15 are included into fig . [ fig4 ] for @xmath16 ( dashed error bars ) .
contrary to the quenched case , we indeed find significant fse at @xmath17 ( and probably @xmath18 ) .
in general , the large volume data is consistent with quenched results .
the @xmath19 mass appears to exceed the @xmath20 reference value but agrees with the continuum extrapolated result .
we acknowledge support by the dfg ( grants schi 257/1 - 4 and schi 257/3 - 2 ) , the eu ( contracts sc1 * -ct91 - 0642 , chrx - ct92 - 0051 and chbg - ct94 - 0665 ) and pparc ( grant gr / k55738 ) . | simulations performed at @xmath3 values lattice volumes at @xmath2 effective lattice resolution ranges from @xmath4 to @xmath6 ratio @xmath8 varies 0.83 to 0.55 to sea quarks slightly heavier than strange quark one quarter of mass results from quenched reference simulations at @xmath9 @xmath11 gev ) presented -.6 cm ? =.simulation parameters -.7 cm -.15 cm = 7.5 cm -1.2 cm in simulations finite size effects on scalar glueball small @xcite long as @xmath13 @xmath14 denotes torelon mass including sea quarks glueball might break up decay into single torelon expected torelon masses @xmath15 included into fig for @xmath16 significant fse at @xmath17 @xmath18 ) large volume data consistent with quenched results @xmath19 mass @xmath20 reference value agrees with continuum extrapolated result support by dfg 257/1 - 4 257/3 - 2 eu pparc | 0.072907 | 448 | 225 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,591 | we give an update on a quantum adiabatic algorithm for the turing noncomputable hilbert s tenth problem , and briefly go over some relevant issues and misleading objections to the algorithm . | hilbert s tenth problem @xcite asks for a _ single _ procedure / algorithm to systematically determine if any given diophantine equation has some positive integer solution or not .
this problem has now been proved to be turing noncomputable , indirectly through an equivalence mapping to the noncomputable turing halting problem @xcite . nevertheless , we have proposed and argued ( with more and more details provided ) in a series of papers @xcite for an algorithm for hilbert s tenth problem based on quantum adiabatic computation @xcite . among the many valid concerns about our algorithm there are also some misleading objections which are still being spread despite their falsehood . in this short note
we will give an updated overall picture of the algorithm and go through , with pointers provided for further discussions elsewhere , some of the valid concerns as well as the misleading objections to dispel the entrenched but baseless prejudice against our proposed algorithm .
a precise statement of the algorithm can be found elsewhere @xcite , but in a few words , given a diophantine equation our aim is to obtain ( by physical means or simulations or otherwise ) the ( fock ) ground state of an appropriate ( and bounded from below ) hamiltonian @xmath0 carrying the information of the input diophantine polynomial .
we will achieve that by starting with yet another easily obtained ground state of another hamiltonian @xmath1 and by adiabatically deforming the hamiltonian @xmath1 in time to the one carrying the diophantine input above .
essential ingredients of the algorithm are : + - ( for an unbounded hamiltonian in a dimensionally infinite space ) will ensure that , provided the adiabaticity and other conditions are satisfied , the initial ground state will turn into the sought - after ground state of @xmath0 with _
high probability_. relevant to this point is the paper by tsirelson @xcite criticising our algorithm when it first came out in 2001 .
this reference has not been published but somehow has been selectively cited by some as an evidence against our algorithm ! those citing , intentionally or not , have either ignored or missed out our reply to tsirelson @xcite which was posted only 3 days later on the same arxiv . in that reply ,
we clearly pointed out that tsirelson s arguments were simply wrong : had they been right , the qat , and not just our algorithm , would have been mathematically wrong for all those years !
+ - is necessary to obtain the adiabaticity condition for the qat with a _
finite _ rate of hamiltonian deformation .
we have employed certain mathematical theorems and a gauge - like symmetry for the class of time - dependent hamiltonians of the algorithm to show @xcite that there is indeed no level crossing .
+ - is necessary because the qat is a nonconstructive theorem and does not tell us how the final probability of obtaining the ground state is approached as a function of the inverse of the rate of change of the hamiltonian deformation .
such final probability certainly does not increase monotonically but varies for different diophantine equations in a complicated manner . to be an algorithm for hilbert s tenth
we need a _ single and universal _ criterion , applicable to any diophantine equation , to identify the sought - after ground state .
we have shown @xcite that it is only the final ground state that can be obtained with a measurement probability _ more than 1/2 _ with our algorithm .
such a probability is our identification criterion for the ground state .
( the proof has now been extended to an infinite number of energy levels , not just the two levels of the ground state and the next excited state , and will appear elsewhere . )
these analytical results have also been supported by numerical simulations @xcite .
+ - is inevitable for our quantum algorithm @xcite , either in determining the identification probability through relative frequencies in physical measurements or in extrapolating to zero - size time step in some numerical simulations @xcite .
we will come back to this probabilistic nature in a section below .
further modification and extension of our work has also appeared in the literature @xcite .
the recursive noncomputability of hilbert s tenth problem lies in the fact that a systematic substitution of positive integers ( in some increasing order of magnitude , say ) into a given diophantine equation could only terminate if the equation has a solution ; otherwise , the substitution would go on indefinitely without any termination point .
( for this reason , the problem is sometimes also termed semi - computable , as we do not have a general method to determine when the equation has _ no _ solution . ) on the other hand , our quantum algorithm apparently is somehow able to explore the infinite ( of the whole domain of positive integers ) in a finite time ! " how can that be ? and some have even used this as an indication , which is misleading , that there must be something wrong with our algorithm !
the logic behind all this is that hilbert s tenth problem belongs to the class of _ finitely refutable mathematical problems _ @xcite .
that is , for any given diophantine equation it only requires a substitution up to some positive integer to determine whether it has any solution or not , even in the case of _ no _ solution : if the equation has no solution within a certain _ finite _ domain of positive integers , it will not have a solution anywhere else in the whole infinite domain !
the noncomputability of hilbert s tenth problem is precisely because we do not have any universal recursive method to determine this finite decisive domain for every diophantine equation . in contradistinction to the recursive mathematics , quantum mechanics can give us the means to determine such finite decisive domain ( in order to make some conclusion in the infinite domain ) through the ( energetically ) ground state @xcite .
the finiteness of such a domain is encoded and reflected accordingly in the finiteness of the algorithm evolution time and in the finiteness of the energy and occupation number of the final ground state .
this is how the paradoxical power of our quantum algorithm can be understood .
( in fact , the quantum algorithm provides an alternative proof for the finitely refutable character of hilbert s tenth and related problems . )
our quantum adiabatic algorithm is probabilistic in the sense that it can produce a result with a probability , which can be made arbitrarily high , of being the correct result . as such
, it has a non - zero probability , even though it can be made arbitrarily small , _ of being incorrect ! _ thus , in a way , in order to compute the noncomputable or decide the undecidable with our algorithm , we will have to allow for the possibility of being wrong , even though we can reduce this chance ( at a cost ) .
it is this probabilistic nature of the algorithm that renders it outside the jurisdiction of cantor s diagonal arguments @xcite employed in the noncomputability proof of the turing halting problem ( and hence of hilbert s tenth problem ) @xcite .
indeed , the discoverers of noncomputability and of incompleteness in mathematics were very much aware of this power of ( probabilistic ) flexibility , as reflected in their own statements @xcite , + - * gdel * : _ ... it remains possible that there may exist ( and even be empirically discovered ) a theorem - proving machine which in fact is equivalent to mathematical intuition , but can not be proved to be so , nor can be proved to yield only correct theorems of finitary number theory . " _
+ - * turing * : _ ... if a machine is expected to be infallible , it can not be intelligent .
there are several theorems which say almost exactly that . but these theorems say nothing about how much intelligence may be displayed if a machine makes no pretence at infallibility . "
_ probabilistic computation may also be more powerful than turing deterministic computation in yet a different way @xcite , contrary to the often misquoted statement that the two are equivalent in terms of computability .
pour - el and richards have shown that @xcite , surprisingly , the solution at a finite time of the linear wave equation in 3 dimensions can be _
noncomputable _ , even with some computable initial condition !
this result not only shows the limitation of turing computability even with linear and supposedly simple differential equations like the well - known wave equations , but also implies a hypothetical physical hypercomputation : starting a controlled wave propagation with a precisely prepared initial condition and then measuring the wave configuration at a given time later to obtain ( compute ) the otherwise noncomputable .
this would work provided that ( i ) the physical wave propagation so performed is governed by the mathematical wave equation ; and ( ii ) the measurement of the wave configuration could be done with infinite precision .
our quantum algorithm not only implies the noncomputability of the solution of the schrdinger equation with a special class of time - dependent hamiltonians ( associated with hilbert s tenth problem ) @xcite ; but also provides the procedure , physical or otherwise , for computing the turing noncomputable , albeit in a probabilistic manner . and thanks to the flexibility of this probabilistic character
, we may not require an infinitely precise measurement ( but see below ) but still have to assume that the mathematics of quantum mechanics underlies any physical implementation of the algorithm , unless the algorithm is simulated on turing machines . beside ours , there are also other appeals to quantum mechanics as the possible evidence and/or resource for hypercomputation @xcite . postulated in quantum mechanics
is the inherent and irreducible randomness ; and true randomness is outside the turing computability @xcite and thus belongs to the domain of hypercomputation , and so does probabilistic computation in general @xcite .
turing machines are not capable of generating truly random numbers , but only pseudo - random output with some finite and recursive algorithms .
hypercomputation beyond the turing computability is thus not so mythical .
at least everyone agrees that random number generation is a kind of hypercomputation , albeit a very special kind .
the problem is whether and how randomness can be harnessed for more interesting computation rather than just being random in itself .
each series of random numbers generated by a series of quantum measurements is different from each other and is not reproducible ( being random by the very definition ) .
what reproducible is not the outcomes but more often is the probabilities for the outcomes .
we have pointed out how _ some _ hypercomputation could be performed with the help of a ( quantum ) probability which is a noncomputable real number @xcite .
the kind of problems that can be solved by this hypercomputation depends on the properties of that real number .
can we make direct use of a particular ( irreproducible ) series of random numbers generated quantum mechanically or otherwise ?
we hope to report these findings elsewhere @xcite .
probabilistic computation may be more powerful than turing computation provided a suitable probability measure can be defined . the systematic substitution of positive integers into a diophantine equation , for example
, does not lend itself to a definable probability measure since the cardinality of any subset used in the substitution is always finite while that of all the positive integers is not .
( recall that there is no recursive way to determine the finite decisive subsets , even when we know that the problem is finitely refutable .
were there a way , the problem would not have been turing noncomputable . ) our algorithm , on the other hand , possesses naturally defined probability measures through the use of quantum mechanics . in a physical implementation of the algorithm , the probability comes from the weak law of large numbers in determining some other quantum probabilities through the relative frequencies obtained from repetitive measurements @xcite .
this determination does not require measurements of infinite precision .
however , there have been some concerns @xcite that infinite precision is still required in physically setting up the various integer parameters in the time - dependent quantum hamiltonians . while the issue deserves further investigations as surely any systematic errors in the hamiltonians would be fatal , we still are not convinced that such integer parameters can not be satisfactorily set up . in particular , we would like to understand the effects of statistical ( as opposed to systematic ) errors on the statistical behaviour of the spectrum of our adiabatic hamiltonians . however , physical implementation is not the only way to carry out the algorithm .
the algorithm could also be simulated on turing machines @xcite .
then how does probability come into such simulations ?
it comes in under the necessary extrapolation of the simulation time steps to zero sizes , which is essentially probabilistic @xcite .
the probability measures here are different from those in the physical implementation but , on the other hand , we do not have the above problem associated with the integer parameters in our hamiltonians .
we have listed and dealt with some of the concerns and objections against our quantum adiabatic algorithm for the turing noncomputable tenth problem of hilbert .
most of these objections ( none of which actually appears in print ) simply root in the belief , and no more than a belief , that there must be something wrong with the algorithm because it claims to be able to compute the very problem that has been mathematically ( and recursively ) proven to be noncomputable ! closer inspection , however , shows that such a belief is simply false as all the noncomputability proof is only valid within a certain framework , outside of which the quantum algorithm operates and hence entails no contradiction with the known and proven facts .
so , what can we expect from the algorithm ?
once and if implemented , it could give an answer , _ with any pre - determined probability _ , with respect to the existence of solution of any given diophantine equation . the probability can be raised arbitrarily without bounds ; but the higher it is , the higher the cost of time and resources it takes .
the other caveat is that the time it takes for a _ successful _ application of the algorithm is not known beforehand but only as an end product , even though it is always finite .
( this successful time is not the time we fix _ a priori _ for each run of the algorithm
each run of the algorithm always has an end point .
we must then keep increasing this running time until successful . )
i am indebted to many of my colleagues for the benefit i have derived through the communication and correspondence with them .
i also wish to acknowledge in particular the on - going support from peter hannaford and alan head .
this point emerged from a group discussion at mit with enrico deotto , ed farhi , jeffrey goldstone and sam gutmann ( 2002 ) .
it goes without saying that if there are mistakes in the interpretation herein , they are solely mine . | hilbert s tenth problem asks for single procedure algorithm to determine if diophantine equation positive integer solution problem proved turing noncomputable through equivalence mapping to noncomputable turing halting problem proposed argued for algorithm for hilbert s tenth problem based on quantum adiabatic computation valid concerns algorithm misleading objections spread despite falsehood short note updated picture of algorithm pointers for valid concerns misleading objections to dispel prejudice against proposed algorithm precise statement of algorithm diophantine equation aim is to obtain ground state of appropriate hamiltonian @xmath0 carrying information input diophantine polynomial achieve by starting with obtained ground state of hamiltonian @xmath1 adiabatically deforming hamiltonian @xmath1 in time to one carrying diophantine input essential ingredients algorithm are + - for unbounded hamiltonian dimensionally infinite space ensure adiabaticity conditions satisfied initial ground state turn into sought - after ground state of @xmath0 with high probability_ relevant paper by tsirelson criticising our algorithm in 2001reference not published cited by as evidence against our algorithm citing ignored or missed reply to tsirelson @xcite posted 3 days later pointed out tsirelson s arguments wrong right qat not algorithm mathematically wrong for years + - necessary to obtain adiabaticity condition for qat with finite rate hamiltonian deformation employed mathematical theorems gauge - like symmetry for time - dependent hamiltonians to show no level crossing + - necessary because qat nonconstructive theorem tell final probability of obtaining ground state function of inverse rate change hamiltonian deformation final probability varies for diophantine equations need single universal criterion to identify sought - ground state shown @xcite final ground state obtained with measurement probability more than 1/2 with our algorithm probability is identification criterion for ground state proof extended to infinite number of energy levels not analytical results supported by numerical simulations @xcite + - inevitable for quantum algorithm @xcite determining identification probability through relative frequencies in physical measurements or extrapolating to zero - size time step in numerical simulations back to probabilistic nature in section belowmodification extension of our work appeared in literature @xcite recursive noncomputability of hilbert s tenth problem lies in systematic substitution of positive integers into diophantine equation terminate if solution otherwise substitution indefinitely without termination point problem termed semi - computable general method to determine when equation has _ no _ solution our quantum algorithm infinite domain of positive integers in finite time some as indication something wrong with our algorithm hilbert s tenth problem belongs to _ finitely refutable mathematical problems _ for requires substitution up to some positive integer to determine solution even in case of _ no _ solution if equation no solution within certain finite domain of positive integers solution anywhere else in whole infinite domain noncomputability of hilbert s tenth problem is because universal recursive method to determine finite decisive domain for every diophantine equation quantum mechanics can means to determine such finite decisive domain through energetically ground state finiteness of domain encoded reflected in algorithm evolution time energy and occupation number of final ground state this paradoxical power of our quantum algorithm can understoodquantum algorithm provides alternative proof for refutable hilbert s tenth related problems our quantum adiabatic algorithm is probabilistic can produce result with probability arbitrarily high of being correct result has non - zero probability arbitrarily small of being incorrect to compute noncomputable or decide undecidable with algorithm allow for possibility of being wrong can reduce this chance at cost probabilistic nature algorithm renders it outside jurisdiction of cantor s diagonal arguments employed in noncomputability proof of turing halting problem hilbert s tenth problem discoverers of noncomputability incompleteness in mathematics aware of power probabilistic flexibility reflected in statements possible may exist theorem - proving machine equivalent to mathematical intuition can not be proved yield only correct theorems of finitary number theory if machine expected to be infallible can not be intelligent several theorems say that say nothing about intelligence if machine no pretence at infallibility probabilistic computation may be more powerful than turing deterministic computation different contrary to statement two equivalent in computabilitypour - el richards shown @xcite solution finite time of linear wave equation in 3 dimensions noncomputable even with computable initial condition result shows limitation of turing computability with linear simple differential equations implies hypothetical physical hypercomputation starting controlled wave propagation with prepared initial condition measuring wave configuration time later to obtain noncomputable physical wave propagation governed by mathematical wave equation measurement with infinite precision quantum algorithm implies noncomputability of solution schrdinger equation with time - dependent hamiltonians hilbert s tenth problem provides procedure for computing turing noncomputable probabilistic flexibility probabilistic character not require infinitely precise measurement mathematics of quantum mechanics underlies physical implementation algorithm unless simulated on turing machines appeals to quantum mechanics possible evidence for hypercomputation @xcite postulated quantum mechanics inherent irreducible randomness true randomness outside turing computability belongs to domain hypercomputation probabilistic computation turing machines generating random numbers pseudo - random output with finite recursive algorithms hypercomputation beyond turing computability not mythicaleveryone agrees random number generation is hypercomputation special problem is randomness harnessed for interesting computation each series of random numbers generated by quantum measurements different not reproducible reproducible not outcomes but probabilities outcomes pointed out hypercomputation could be performed with quantum probability noncomputable real number problems hypercomputation depends on properties real number can we make direct use of particular irreproducible series of random numbers generated ? hope report findings elsewhere probabilistic computation may be more powerful than turing computation provided suitable probability measure defined systematic substitution of positive integers into diophantine equation lend to definable probability measure cardinality of subset substitution finite all positive integers not no recursive way to determine finite decisive subsets problem refutable problem noncomputable our algorithm possesses naturally defined probability measures through quantum mechanics physical implementation probability comes from weak law of large numbers determining other quantum probabilities through relative frequencies from repetitive measurements determination not require infinite precision concerns that infinite precision required in setting up integer parameters in time - dependent quantum hamiltoniansissue deserves further investigations systematic errors in hamiltonians be fatal not convinced integer parameters not be satisfactorily set up to understand effects of statistical errors on statistical behaviour adiabatic hamiltonians physical implementation not only way to carry algorithm algorithm could be simulated on turing machines @xcite probability into simulations ? comes under necessary extrapolation of simulation time steps to zero sizes essentially probabilistic @xcite probability measures different from physical implementation problem with integer parameters in hamiltonians listed dealt with concerns and objections against quantum adiabatic algorithm for turing noncomputable tenth problem of hilbert objections root in belief something wrong with algorithm claims to compute problem proven noncomputable closer inspection shows belief false noncomputability proof only valid within certain framework outside quantum algorithm operates entails no contradiction with known proven facts what expect from algorithm ? once implemented could give answer with pre - determined probability to existence of solution of any diophantine equation probability can be raised arbitrarily higher higher cost of time and resources time for successful application of algorithm not known beforehand only as end product always finitesuccessful time not fix a priori each run algorithm end point must keep increasing running time until successful indebted to colleagues for benefit derived through communication correspondence acknowledge support from peter hannaford alan head point emerged from group discussion at mit with enrico deotto ed farhi jeffrey goldstone sam gutmann ( 2002 ) mistakes in interpretation solely mine | 0.507455 | 3,127 | 1,515 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,604 | somehow , the revised version of our paper @xcite does not appear on journals home page . here
we present the revised version altered to reflect the corrections and/or additions to that paper . in this note
, we consider self - affine attractors that are generated by an integer expanding @xmath0 matrix ( i.e. , all of its eigenvalues have moduli @xmath1 ) and a finite set of vectors in @xmath2 .
we concentrate on the problem of connectedness for @xmath3 .
although , there has been intensive study on the topic recently , this problem is not settled even in the one - dimensional case .
we focus on some basic attractors , which have not been studied fully , and characterize connectedness
. * keywords . * self - affine attractors , self - affine tiles , connectedness . | let @xmath4 , @xmath5 , be contractions on @xmath6 , i.e. , @xmath7 for all @xmath8 with @xmath9 .
here @xmath10 stands for the usual euclidean norm , but this norm may be replaced by any other norm on @xmath6 . it is well known @xcite that there exists a unique non - empty compact set @xmath11 such that @xmath12 let @xmath13 denote the set of @xmath0 matrices with real entries .
we will assume that @xmath14 where @xmath15 , called _ digits _ , and @xmath16 then @xmath17 is called a _ self - affine set _ or a _ self - affine fractal _ , and can be viewed as the invariant set or the attractor of the ( affine ) _ iterated function system _ ( ifs ) @xmath18 ( in the terminology of dynamical systems ) .
let @xmath19 be the set of @xmath0 integer matrices .
further , if @xmath20 and @xmath21 , it is called an
_ integral self - affine set _ and we will primarily consider such sets in this paper . if , additionally , @xmath22 and the integral self - affine set @xmath17 has positive lebesgue measure , then @xmath17 is called an _
integral self - affine tile_. we sometimes write @xmath23 for @xmath17 to stress the dependence on @xmath24 and @xmath25 . for such tiles ,
the positivity of the lebesgue measure is equivalent to having nonempty interior @xcite .
there is a demand to develop analysis on fractal spaces , in order to deal with physical phenomena like heat and electricity flow in disordered media , vibrations of fractal materials and turbulence in fluids . without a better understanding of the topology of fractals
, this seems to be a difficult task .
there is a growing literature on the formalization and representation of topological questions ; see @xcite for a survey of the field .
one of the interesting aspects of the self - affine sets is the _ connectedness _ , which roughly means the attractor can not be written as a disjoint union of two pieces .
this property is important in computer vision and remote sensing @xcite .
we mention that connected self - affine fractals are curves ; thus , they are sometimes referred to as self - affine curves @xcite .
there is some motivation for studying connected self - affine tiles because they are related to number systems , wavelets , torus maps .
recently , there have been intensive investigations on the topic by kirat and lau @xcite , akiyama and thuswaldner @xcite , ngai and tang @xcite and luo et al .
@xcite . in this note
, we consider planar integral self - affine fractals obtained from @xmath26 integer matrices with reducible characteristic polynomials , and report our findings on their connectedness .
however , our considerations can be generalized to higher dimensions . as for the organization of the paper , in section [ simple ]
, we deal with special cases and state some simple , but unconventional techniques to check the connectedness . in section [ general ] ,
we study the neighbor sets of self - affine fractals .
usually , connectedness criteria were given by using a `` graph '' with vertices in @xmath25 @xcite . in this section
, we present graph - independent techniques to check the connectedness or disconnectedness . throughout the paper
, @xmath27 is a contraction .
let @xmath28 denote the number of elements in @xmath25 .
we first recall a known result .
[ collinear1 ] @xcite suppose @xmath29 $ ] with @xmath30 , and @xmath31 with @xmath32 then @xmath33 is a connected tile if and only if , up to a translation , @xmath34 for some @xmath35 . as one may notice @xmath36 and @xmath25 are not arbitrary in proposition [ collinear1 ] since @xmath30 and @xmath37 .
by using the approach in @xcite , we can remove such restrictions .
for that purpose , we consider the convex hull of @xmath17 and denote it by @xmath38 .
also let @xmath39 then we have the following .
[ collinear2 ] let @xmath40 with @xmath41 and @xmath42 , where @xmath43 and @xmath44 is the identity matrix .
then @xmath33 is connected if and only if @xmath45 .
[ fig1 ] a digit set @xmath25 as in proposition [ collinear2 ] is called a _ collinear
_ digit set .
it is easy to check the condition @xmath45 in the proposition because @xmath38 is a closed interval .
also , note that if @xmath46 , then @xmath33 is connected for any digit set .
a famous example of this type is the sierpi@xmath47ski tile ( see figure [ fig1 ] ) , for which @xmath48 and @xmath49 , d_2=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 1 \\ 0 \end{array } \right ] , d_3=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 0 \\ 1 \end{array } \right ] , d_{4}=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } -1 \\ -1 \end{array } \right ] \}$ ] .
the disconnectedness of @xmath33 was studied in @xcite . here
we want to mention another unconventional sufficient condition for disconnectedness . in the rest of the paper , we study attractors @xmath33 in the plane such that @xmath50 has a reducible characteristic polynomial . from @xcite , we know that such matrices are conjugate to one of the following lower triangular matrices @xmath51 } , \ \ \
\ \mbox{where $ |n| \geq |m|$ , and $ t=0 $ or $ t=1 $ } .\ ] ] we also let @xmath52 } : 0\leq i \leq |n| -1 , \ 0\leq j
\leq |m| -1\}.\ ] ] the attractors of the next proposition can be considered as a generalization of sierpi@xmath47ski carpets @xcite .
let @xmath53 be the _ singular value dimension _ of @xmath17 ( see @xcite ) .
we call a collinear digit set @xmath25 with @xmath54 is an eigenvector of @xmath24 _ eigen - collinear_. in that case , @xmath17 is a subset of a line segment . by using corollary 5 in @xcite , we obtain the following . [ disconnectedness ] assume that @xmath24 is as in ( [ matrix ] ) , @xmath55 , and @xmath25 is not eigen - collinear . then @xmath33 is disconnected if @xmath56 , where @xmath57 and @xmath58 is the number of @xmath59 so that @xmath60}\in d$ ] for some @xmath61 .
it is easy to check the sufficient condition for the attractors @xmath33 in proposition [ disconnectedness ] because , in that case , @xmath62
in this section , we will present a practical way of checking the connectedness of @xmath33 with @xmath24 as in ( [ matrix ] ) and @xmath55 . note that it is enough to consider the case @xmath63 , since @xmath64 .
let @xmath65\})$ ] , which we call the _ neighbor set _ of @xmath17 .
set @xmath66 , \ \ \
a_2=\tiny \left[\begin{array}{cc } 0 \\
m-1 \end{array } \right ] , \ \ \
a_3=\tiny \left[\begin{array}{cc } n-1 \\
m-1 \end{array } \right ] } , \ \ \
b_1=\tiny \left[\begin{array}{cc } n-1 \\ 0 \end{array } \right],\ ] ] @xmath67 , \ \
e_2=\tiny \left[\begin{array}{cc } 0 \\ 1 \end{array } \right ] , \ \
e_3=\tiny \left[\begin{array}{cc } 1
\\ 1 \end{array } \right ] , \ \
e_4=\tiny \left[\begin{array}{cc } 1 \\ -1 \end{array } \right ] } .\ ] ] for a digit set @xmath25 , an _
s - chain _ ( in @xmath25 ) is a finite sequence @xmath76 of @xmath77 vectors in @xmath25 such that @xmath78 for @xmath79 then we can put the connectedness criterion in @xcite into the following form . note that if @xmath80 after re - indexing , it is possible that @xmath81 for @xmath82 .
two examples are given in figure [ fig2 ] .
for the first fractal of figure [ fig2 ] , we have @xmath83 and @xmath84,d_2=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 2 \\ 1 \end{array } \right ] , d_3=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } -1 \\ 1 \end{array } \right ] , d_4=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 1 \\ 3 \end{array } \right ] , d_5=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 2 \\ 0 \end{array } \right ] , d_6=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 2 \\ 2 \end{array } \right ] , d_7=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } -2 \\ 2 \end{array } \right ] , d_8=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } -1 \\ 3 \end{array }
\right ] \}. $ ] in view of proposition [ neighbors1 ] and proposition [ neighbors2 ] , proposition [ connectedness ] is quite feasible because the connectedness can be decided by a simple inspection of @xmath25 using @xmath85 in propositions [ neighbors1]-[neighbors2 ] .
that is , we get a graph - independent way of checking the connectedness .
for the second fractal on the right , @xmath86 and @xmath49 , d_2=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 1 \\ 1 \end{array } \right ] , d_3=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 2 \\ 2 \end{array } \right ] , d_{4}=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 3 \\ 3 \end{array } \right ] , d_{5}=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 2 \\ 1 \end{array } \right ] , d_{6}=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 1 \\ 2 \end{array } \right ] , d_{7}=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 0 \\ 3 \end{array } \right ] , d_{8}=\left [ \begin{array}{cc } 3 \\ 0 \end{array } \right ] \}$ ] . for the general case @xmath87 , we have the following trivial proposition , which again can be used together with proposition [ connectedness ] .
let @xmath88 @xmath89 note that it is possible that @xmath90 or @xmath91 .
t. k. dey , h. edelsbrunner , and s. guha , _ computational topology _ in advances in discrete and computational geometry , b. chazelle , j. e. goodman and r. pollack , eds .
, contemp .
, vol 223 , american mathematical society , providence , ri , 1999 , pp . 109 - 143 . | @xmath4 @xmath5 contractions on @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 stands for euclidean norm be replaced by norm on @xmath6 unique non - empty compact set @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 denote @xmath0 matrices with real entries assume @xmath14 @xmath15 _ digits @xmath17 _ self - affine set _ fractal invariant set attractor of iterated function system @xmath18 dynamical systems @xmath19 set of @xmath0 integer matrices @xmath20 @xmath21 _ integral self - affine set _ consider paper @xmath22 - affine set @xmath17 positive lebesgue measure @xmath17 _ integral self - affine tile_ @xmath23 for @xmath17 stress dependence on @xmath24 @xmath25 positivity of lebesgue measure equivalent to nonempty interior demand to develop analysis on fractal spaces with phenomena heat electricity flow vibrations turbulence in fluids understanding topology fractals difficult task growing literature on formalization representation of topological questions see @xcite for surveyinteresting self - affine sets connectedness attractor not written disjoint union of two pieces important in computer vision remote sensing connected self - affine fractals are curves referred motivation for studying connected self - affine tiles related to number systems wavelets torus maps intensive investigations by kirat lau akiyama thuswaldner ngai tang luo consider planar integral self - affine fractals from @xmath26 integer matrices with reducible characteristic polynomials report findings on connectedness considerations can generalized to higher dimensions organization paper section [ simple deal with special cases techniques to check connectedness section general study neighbor sets of self - affine fractals connectedness criteria graph with vertices in @xmath25 present graph - independent techniques to check connectedness disconnectedness @xmath27 is contraction @xmath28 number of elements in @xmath25 @xmath29 with @xmath30 @xmath31 with @xmath32 @xmath33 is connected tile if @xmath34 for @xmath35 @xmath36 and @xmath25 not arbitrary in proposition since @xmath30 and @xmath37using approach in @xcite remove restrictions consider convex hull of @xmath17 denote by @xmath38 let @xmath39 following collinear2 ] @xmath40 with @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 and @xmath44 identity matrix @xmath33 connected if @xmath45 fig1 ] digit set @xmath25 proposition [ collinear2 ] called _ collinear _ digit set check condition @xmath45 proposition @xmath38 closed interval if @xmath46 @xmath33 connected for any digit set example sierpi@xmath47ski tile figure fig1 @xmath48 and @xmath49 d_2=\left 1 d_3=\left_{4}=\left disconnectedness of @xmath33 studied in @xcite mention unconventional sufficient condition for disconnectedness study attractors @xmath33 plane @xmath50 has reducible characteristic polynomial @xcite matrices conjugate to lower triangular matrices @xmath51 } $ |n \geq |m|$ $ t=0 $ or $ t=1 $let @xmath52 0\leq i |n| -1 0\leq j \leq |m| -1\ attractors next proposition generalization sierpi@xmath47ski carpets @xcite @xmath53 singular value dimension @xmath17 call collinear digit set @xmath25 with @xmath54 eigenvector @xmath24 - collinear @xmath17 subset line segment corollary 5 @xcite obtain disconnectedness @xmath24 @xmath55 @xmath25 not eigen - collinear @xmath33 disconnected if @xmath56 @xmath57 and @xmath58 number @xmath59 @xmath60}\in d$ @xmath61 check sufficient condition attractors @xmath33 proposition disconnectedness @xmath62 practical checking connectedness @xmath33 with @xmath24 @xmath55 consider case @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65\})$ neighbor set of @xmath17 @xmath66 a_2=\tiny \left[\begin{array{cc 0 \\ m-1{array a_3=\tiny \left n-1 \\ m-1{array\right b_1=\tiny \left[{array{cc n-1 \\ 0\end{array\right @xmath67 e_2=\tiny \left 0 \\ 1 \end{array \right e_3=\tiny \left[\begin{array{cc 1 \\ 1 \end{array } \right e_4=\tiny \left[{cc 1 \\ -1 \end{array \right digit set @xmath25 s - chain finite sequence @xmath76 @xmath77 vectors @xmath78 for @xmath79 connectedness criterion @xmath80 re - indexing @xmath81 for @xmath82 examples figurefirst fractal figure fig2 @xmath83 @xmath84_2\left\begin{array 2 \\ 1{array\right d_3\left\begin -1 \\ 1{array\right d_4\left\begin 1 \\ 3 {array \right d_5\left\begin 2 \\ 0 {array \right d_6\left\begin{array{cc 2 \\ 2 {array } \right d_7=\left\begin{array{cc -2 \\ 2 \end{array } \right d_8=\left\begin{array{cc } -1 \\ 3 \end{array } \right proposition neighbors1 ] neighbors2 connectedness feasible inspection @xmath25 @xmath85 propositions neighbors1]- graph - independent checking connectednesssecond fractal right @xmath86 @xmath49 d_2\left\begin{array{cc 1 \\ 1\right d_3=\left 2 \\ 2\right d_{4}\left 3 \\ 3{array\right d{5}=\left{cc 2 \\ 1{array \right d_{6}=\left{array{cc 1 \\ 2 {array \right d_{7}=\left\begin{array{cc 0 \\ 3 {array \right ] d_{8}=\left\begin{array{cc 3 \\ 0 {array \right general case @xmath87 trivial proposition [ connectedness ] @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 t. k. dey edelsbrunner s. guha computational topology advances discrete computational geometry. chazelle goodman r pollack vol 223 american mathematical society 1999 pp 109 - 143 | 0.428579 | 2,707 | 1,478 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,606 | the strong decay properties of the newly observed @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 are studied in a constituent quark model .
it is predicted that the @xmath3 and @xmath2 seem to be two overlapping resonances .
the @xmath3 could be identified as the @xmath4 with @xmath5 , while the @xmath2 is most likely to be the high - mass mixed state @xmath6 ( @xmath7 ) via the @xmath8-@xmath9 mixing .
the @xmath1 favors the low - mass mixed state @xmath10 @xmath11 via the @xmath12-@xmath13 mixing .
the @xmath0 as the @xmath14 assignment bears controversies for its too broad width given in experiments . | recently , four new charmed mesons , @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 , were observed by babar collaboration @xcite .
the @xmath15 and @xmath16 with neutral charge were first found in the @xmath17 channel .
then their isospin partners @xmath18 and @xmath19 were observed in @xmath20 as well
. further analysis of the @xmath21 invariant mass spectrum confirmed the @xmath15 .
furthermore , two additional new charmed mesons , @xmath22 and @xmath23 , were found in the @xmath21 channel .
the measured branching ratio fractions are @xmath24 the other observed results are summarized in tab . [ wfs ] . to determine the spin - parity @xmath25 of these newly observed charmed mesons , the babar collaboration also analyzed their helicity distributions .
these newly observed charmed mesons make great progress in the establishment of the charmed meson spectroscopy . from the pdg book @xcite
, it is seen that only six low - lying states , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 , have been established .
the higher excitations , @xmath32 and @xmath33 waves , are still absent .
thus , the find of @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 provides us a good opportunity to establish the missing @xmath32 and @xmath33 states .
the @xmath22 may be identified as the radial excitation of the @xmath34 ( i.e. @xmath14 ) @xcite , for its quark model predicted mass @xmath35 gev @xcite , helicity distribution ( @xmath36 ) @xcite and dominated decay mode @xmath37 consist with the observations .
the @xmath1 is observed in both @xmath38 and @xmath37 channels , thus , its possible @xmath25 are @xmath39 and @xmath40 in the @xmath32 and @xmath33 states .
the babar analysis of helicity distribution ( @xmath41 ) @xcite also indicates that the @xmath1 may be @xmath39 or @xmath40 assignments @xcite .
the typical quark model predicted mass of @xmath4 is @xmath42 gev @xcite , which is much larger than that of @xmath1 .
thus , the @xmath1 as the @xmath5 assignment should be excluded
. the @xmath2 and @xmath3 may be good candidates of @xmath26 wave states for their masses are close to those of @xmath26 waves predicted in various quark models @xcite .
since the @xmath23 is observed in @xmath21 channel , its possible @xmath25 are @xmath39 , @xmath43 and @xmath40 .
the helicity distribution of the @xmath44 and @xmath40 assignments is a simple @xmath45 distribution @xcite , which is inconsistent with the babar observation that the @xmath23 does not show a simple helicity distribution @xcite .
although the mass of @xmath3 is very close to that of @xmath2 , they may be two different states for their mass and width values differ by 2.6@xmath46 and 1.5@xmath46 , respectively @xcite .
the observation of @xmath3 in @xmath38 channel indicates it may be a candidate of @xmath12 or @xmath4 . to distinguish the different candidates for these newly observed charmed mesons , in this work
, we study their strong decay properties in a constituent quark model , which has been developed and successfully used to deal with the strong decays of heavy - light mesons and charmed baryons @xcite .
very recently , the strong decays of the @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath3 were studied by liu _
_ in a @xmath47 model @xcite . for the @xmath0 and @xmath1 , the main @xmath47 model predictions are compatible with our quark model predictions . in @xcite ,
two candidates are suggested for the @xmath3 .
they are the mixed state via @xmath13-@xmath12 mixing and @xmath4 , respectively . in our predictions , only the @xmath4 is the favored assignment to @xmath3 .
the paper is organized as follows . in the subsequent section
, a brief review of the model is given .
the numerical results are presented and discussed in sec .
finally , a summary is given in sec .
[ suma ] .
.summary of the experimental results . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] in this work
we have studied the strong decay properties of the newly observed @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 by babar collaboration in a constituent chiral quark model .
these newly observed charmed mesons provide us a chance to establish a more completed @xmath26 meson spectroscopy , which has been shown in tab .
[ dds ] . for comparison
, the @xmath48 meson spectroscopy is also included .
we have found that @xmath22 as the @xmath14 is still questionable .
the predicted narrow width of @xmath14 is inconsistent with the observation , although its decay modes , helicity distributions and theoretical predicted mass satisfy this classification .
given the poor statistics of @xmath22 , its decay width may be overestimated by experimentalists .
we expect them to observe it in both @xmath37 and @xmath49 channels .
the @xmath1 can be identified as the low mass mixed state @xmath50 via the @xmath13-@xmath12 mixing .
this mixed state is also predicted in the @xmath48 meson spectroscopy , which corresponds to the @xmath51 @xcite . in our
mixing scheme the high mass partner @xmath52 may be too broad to be observed in @xmath26 meson spectroscopy , while it might be found in @xmath48 spectroscopy @xcite .
to understand the nature of @xmath1 further , we suggest to observe it in @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 and @xmath56 channels .
the @xmath3 is most likely to be the @xmath57 .
its decays are governed by @xmath38 and @xmath37 , which can naturally explain why @xmath3 is first observed in @xmath38 channel .
the predicted ratio is @xmath58 .
the @xmath3 as high mass partner of @xmath1 via the @xmath13-@xmath12 mixing was also suggested in @xcite , where the predicted partial decay width of @xmath38 is tiny .
further experimental measurement of the ratios @xmath59 , @xmath60 and @xmath61 should be able to disentangle its properties .
the @xmath2 and @xmath3 might be two different charmed meson states .
the @xmath2 is favorably interpreted as the high mass mixed state @xmath6 ( @xmath43 ) via the @xmath8-@xmath9 mixing .
its low - mass partner @xmath62 may be too broad to be observed in experiments .
to confirm the @xmath2 , the decay channels @xmath53 , @xmath49 , @xmath63 and @xmath54 are suggested to be observed in future experiments .
finally , we should mention that in our previous work @xcite , we predicted that @xmath64 might correspond to two largely overlapping resonances , one resonance is likely to be the @xmath4 [ denoted by @xmath65 and the other resonance seems to be the mixed state between @xmath9 and @xmath8 [ denoted by @xmath66 . combining the study of the @xmath2 and @xmath3 in present work , we easily conclude that both @xmath3 and @xmath67 are most likely to be the @xmath4 , while both @xmath2 and @xmath68 might be classified as the mixed state @xmath6 with almost the same mixing angle . to test our predictions and clarify the controversial situation of @xmath64 @xcite
, we suggest to analyze the helicity distribution of @xmath69 in experiments .
if the helicity distribution is in proportion to @xmath70 , the @xmath64 should be two largely overlapping resonances .
the author would like to thank professor xiang liu for drawing his attention to the babar collaboration s new data .
this work is supported by the national natural science foundation of china ( grant nos .
10775145 and 11075051 ) .
j. benitez _
et al . _ , in ichep2010 , paris , july 23 , 2010 ; p.
del amo sanchez _ et al .
_ [ the babar collaboration ] , phys . rev .
d * 82 * , 111101 ( 2010 ) . c. amsler
_ et al . _
[ particle data group ] , phys .
b * 667 * , 1 ( 2008 ) .
s. godfrey and n. isgur , phys .
d * 32 * , 189 ( 1985 ) .
x. h. zhong and q. zhao , phys .
d * 77 * , 074008 ( 2008 ) .
z. f. sun , j. s. yu , x. liu and t. matsuki , phys .
d * 82 * , 111501 ( 2010 ) .
a. manohar and h. georgi , nucl .
b * 234 * , 189 ( 1984 ) .
z. p. li , phys .
d * 50 * , 5639 ( 1994 ) .
q. zhao , z. p. li and c. bennhold , phys .
c * 58 * , 2393 ( 1998 ) ; phys .
b * 436 * , 42 ( 1998 ) .
q. zhao , phys .
c * 63 * , 025203 ( 2001 ) .
q. zhao , j. s. al - khalili and c. bennhold , phys .
c * 64 * , 052201 ( 2001 ) .
i. hleiqawi _ et al . _ [ clas collaboration ] , phys .
c * 75 * , 042201 ( 2007 ) [ erratum - ibid .
c * 76 * , 039905 ( 2007 ) ] .
m. nanova _ et al .
_ [ cbelsa / taps collaboration ] , eur .
j. a * 35 * , 333 ( 2008 ) .
p. colangelo , f. de fazio , s. nicotri and m. rizzi , phys . rev .
d * 77 * , 014012 ( 2008 ) .
f. e. close , c. e. thomas , o. lakhina and e. s. swanson , phys .
b * 647 * , 159 ( 2007 ) .
d. m. li and b. ma , phys .
d * 81 * , 014021 ( 2010 ) .
f. e. close and e. s. swanson , phys .
d * 72 * , 094004 ( 2005 ) .
zhi - gang wang , arxiv:1009.3605 [ hep - ph ] . | four new charmed mesons @xmath0 observed by babar collaboration @xcite @xmath15 @xmath16 with neutral charge found in @xmath17 channel isospin partners @xmath18 observed in @xmath20 analysis of @xmath21 invariant mass spectrum confirmed @xmath15 two additional mesons @xmath22 found in @xmath21 channel measured branching ratio fractions are @xmath24 results summarized in tab . wfs ] to spin - parity @xmath25 of analyzed helicity distributions mesons make progress in establishment charmed meson spectroscopy pdg book six low - lying states @xmath26 established higher excitations @xmath32 waves absent find of @xmath0 opportunity to establish missing @xmath32 and @xmath33 states @xmath22 as radial excitation of @xmath34 ) @xcite quark model predicted mass @xmath35 gev helicity distribution dominated decay mode @xmath37 consist with observations@xmath1 observed in channels possible @xmath25 @xmath39 in @xmath32 states babar analysis helicity distribution indicates @xmath1 may be @xmath39 or assignments typical predicted mass of @xmath4 is @xmath42 gev larger than @xmath1 @xmath1 as @xmath5 assignment excluded @xmath2 @xmath3 good candidates of @xmath26 wave states masses close to @xmath26 waves @xmath23 observed in @xmath21 channel possible @xmath25 are @xmath39 @xmath43 @xmath40 helicity distribution of @xmath44 @xmath40 assignments is simple @xmath45 distribution inconsistent with observation @xmath23 show simple helicity distribution mass @xmath3 close to @xmath2 may be two different states mass width values differ by 2.6@xmath46 and 1.5@xmath46 observation @xmath3 in @xmath38 channel candidate of @xmath12 or @xmath4 candidates study strong decay properties in constituent quark modelrecently strong decays of @xmath0 studied by liu in @xmath47 model @xcite @xmath0 @xmath47 model predictions compatible with quark model predictions in @xcite two candidates suggested for @xmath3 mixed state via @xmath13-@xmath12 mixing and @xmath4 @xmath4 favored to @xmath3 paper organized review of model numerical results presented summary experimental results studied strong decay properties of observed @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath3 by babar collaboration in constituent chiral quark model observed mesons establish completed @xmath26 meson spectroscopy shown in tab @xmath48 meson spectroscopy included @xmath22 @xmath14 questionable predicted narrow width of @xmath14 inconsistent with observation decay modes helicity distributions theoretical predicted mass satisfy classification poor statistics of @xmath22 decay width may be overestimated by experimentalists expect to observe in @xmath37 and @xmath49 channels@xmath1 identified low mass mixed state @xmath50 via @xmath13-@xmath12 mixing predicted in @xmath48 meson spectroscopy corresponds to @xmath51 @xcite high mass partner @xmath52 broad @xmath26 meson spectroscopy in @xmath48 spectroscopy @xcite @xmath1 observe in @xmath53 channels @xmath3 likely @xmath57 decays governed by @xmath38 @xmath37 @xmath3 first observed in @xmath38 channel predicted ratio is @xmath58 @xmath3 high mass partner @xmath1 suggested in @xcite partial decay width of @xmath38 tiny measurement ratios @xmath59 @xmath61 disentangle properties @xmath2 @xmath3 different meson states @xmath2 high mass mixed state @xmath6 ) via @xmath8-@xmath9 mixing low - mass partner @xmath62 may too broad confirm @xmath2 decay channels @xmath53 @xmath54 future experimentsprevious work predicted @xmath64 two overlapping resonances one likely @xmath4 @xmath65 other mixed state between @xmath9 @xmath8 @xmath66 @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath67 likely @xmath4 @xmath2 @xmath68 mixed state @xmath6 same mixing angle test predictions @xmath64 suggest analyze helicity distribution @xmath69 if proportion @xmath70 @xmath64 overlapping resonances professor xiang liu babar collaboration new data work supported national natural science foundation china grant 10775145 11075051 j. benitez al . ichep2010 paris july 23 2010 p. del amo sanchez babar collaboration phys . rev . d * 82 * 111101 ( 2010 ) c. amsler particle data group phys . b * 667 * 1 ( 2008 ) s. godfrey n. isgur phys . d * 32 * 189 ( 1985 ). zhong q. zhao phys . d * 77 * 074008 ( 2008 ) sun s yu x liu t matsuki phys d 82 * 111501 ( 2010 ) manohar h georgi 234 189 ( 1984 ) z p. li phys d 50 5639 ( 1994 ) zhao z p. li bennhold 58 2393 ( 1998 ) b 436 42 ( 1998 ) zhao 63 025203 ( 2001 ) al - khalili 64 052201 ( 2001 ) hleiqawi collaboration phys c 75 042201 ( 2007 ) 76 * 039905 ( 2007 ) nanova taps collaboration 35 * 333 ( 2008 ). colangelo. de fazio s nicotri m. rizzi phys d 77 * 014012 ( 2008 ) close thomas lakhina s swanson b 647 * 159 ( 2007 ) m. li b. ma phys d 81 * 014021 ( 2010 ) e. close s swanson phys d 72 * 094004 ( 2005 ) zhi - gang wang arxiv:1009.3605 | 0.35241 | 2,657 | 1,353 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,619 | we use the paris nucleon - antinucleon optical potential for explanation of experimental data in the process @xmath0 near threshold .
it turns out that final - state interaction due to paris optical potential allows us to reproduce available experimental data .
it follows from our consideration that the isoscalar form factor is much larger than the isovector one . | at present , qcd can not describe quantitatively the low - energy nucleon - antinucleon interaction , and various phenomenological approaches have been suggested in order to explain numerous experimental data , see , e.g. , refs .
@xcite and recent reviews @xcite .
however , parameters of the models still can not be extracted with a good accuracy from the experimental data @xcite .
very recently , renewed interest in low - energy nucleon - antinucleon physics has been stimulated by the experimental observation of a strong enhancement of decay probability at low invariant mass of @xmath1 in the processes @xmath2 @xcite , @xmath3 and @xmath4 @xcite , @xmath5 and @xmath6 @xcite , @xmath7 @xcite .
one of the most natural explanation of this enhancement is final state interaction of the proton and antiproton @xcite .
a similar phenomenon was observed in the investigation of the proton ( antiproton ) electric , @xmath8 , and magnetic , @xmath9 , form factors in the process @xmath10 @xcite .
namely , it was found that the ratio @xmath11 strongly depends on @xmath12 ( in the center - of - mass frame ) in the narrow region of the energy @xmath13 near the threshold of @xmath1 production .
such strong dependence at small @xmath13 is related to the large - scale interaction of proton and antiproton .
therefore , it is possible to apply the approaches of @xcite for an explanation of experimental data in the process @xmath0 . in the present paper ,
we use the paris nucleon - antinucleon optical potential @xmath14 which has the form @xcite : @xmath15 where the real part @xmath16 is the @xmath17-parity transform of the well established paris @xmath18 potential for the long- and medium - range distances ( @xmath19 ) , and some phenomenological part for the short distances .
the absorptive part @xmath20 of the optical potential takes into account the inelastic channels of @xmath21 interaction , i.e. annihilation into mesons .
it is essential at short distances and depends on the kinetic energy of the particles .
we perform calculations in the non - relativistic approximation .
the coulomb interaction between proton and antiproton is important only for the kinetic energy @xmath22 mev , where @xmath23 is the fine structure constant , and @xmath24 is the proton mass .
here we consider the process for kinetic energies @xmath25 mev , therefore we neglect the coulomb interaction . taking into account that the difference of the cross sections @xmath0 and @xmath26 is small @xcite
, we calculate the cross sections at a given isospin final states and compare them with the experimental data for @xmath27 . as a result we found that the amplitude with the isospin @xmath28 strongly dominates .
besides , our prediction for the ratio @xmath11 depends on the parameters of the paris potential but independent of the form factor at threshold .
the ratio is also in a qualitative agreement with experimental data .
in the nonrelativistic approximation , the amplitude of @xmath29 pair production in a certain isospin channel @xmath30 near threshold can be presented as follows ( in units @xmath31 ) : @xmath32\ , , \nonumber\\ & & \mathcal g_s^i=\mathcal f_1^i(q^2)+\mathcal f_2^i(q^2)+\frac{\beta^2}{6}[\mathcal f_2^i(q^2)-\mathcal f_1^i(q^2)]\,,\nonumber\\ & & \mathcal g_d^i=\mathcal f_1^i(q^2)-\mathcal f_2^i(q^2)\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath33 , @xmath34 is a virtual photon polarization vector , corresponding to the projection of spin @xmath35 , and @xmath36 is the spin-1 function of @xmath29 pair , @xmath37 is the projection of spin on the vector @xmath38 .
two tensor structures in eq.([2 ] ) correspond to the s - wave and d - wave production amplitudes .
the total angular momentum of the @xmath29 pair is fixed by a production mechanism .
the functions @xmath39 and @xmath40 are the dirac form factors of the @xmath29 pair which include the effects of final state interaction and have a pronounced @xmath41 behavior near the threshold .
summation over the polarization of nucleon pair and averaging over the polarization of virtual photon is performed using the equations , @xmath42 where @xmath43 is the electron momentum .
our aim is to single out the effects of final state interaction . in order to do that , we write the amplitude ( [ 2 ] ) in the form @xmath44\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where
@xmath45 is the fourier transform of the function @xmath46 , the wave function of the @xmath29 pair in coordinate space .
this wave function is the solution of the schrdinger equation @xmath47 where @xmath48 is the optical potential .
note that @xmath49 is the left eigenfunction of the bi - orthogonal set of eigenfunctions of the non - hermitian operator @xmath50 .
the asymptotic form of the wave function at large distances reads @xmath51 in eq.([3 ] ) the form factors @xmath52 and @xmath53 are @xmath54 where the `` bare '' dirac form factors @xmath55 and @xmath56 do not account for the effect of final state interaction .
near threshold these form factors are smooth functions of @xmath41 and can be treated as phenomenological constants .
let us introduce the vector spherical functions @xmath57 as @xmath58 where @xmath59 are spherical harmonics , @xmath60 are clebsch - gordan coefficients , and @xmath61 . in eq .
( [ a ] ) the quantization axes is directed along the vector @xmath38 .
then the wave function @xmath46 can be written in the form @xmath62
\nonumber\\ & & + \sum_j \sqrt{4\pi(2j+3 ) } c^{j\,\lambda}_{j+1\,0,\,1\,\lambda}\big [ u^{i*}_{2j}(r)\bm y_{j\,\lambda}^{j-1}(\bm n)+w^{i*}_{2j}(r)\bm y_{j\,\lambda}^{j+1}(\bm n)\big]\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] here the functions @xmath63 , @xmath64 , and @xmath65 have the asymptotic form at large distances @xmath66}-e^{-i[kr - j\pi/2]}\big]\,,\nonumber\\ & & u^i_{1j}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}\big[s_{11}^{ij}e^{i[kr-(j-1)\pi/2]}-e^{-i[kr-(j-1)\pi/2]}\big]\,,\nonumber\\ & & w^i_{1j}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}s_{12}^{ij}e^{i[kr-(j+1)\pi/2]}\,,\nonumber\\ & & u^i_{2j}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}s_{21}^{ij}e^{i[kr-(j-1)\pi/2]}\,,\nonumber\\ & & w^i_{2j}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}\big[s_{22}^{ij}e^{i[kr-(j+1)\pi/2]}-e^{-i[kr-(j+1)\pi/2]}\big]\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath67 and @xmath68 are some functions of energy with @xmath69 and @xmath70 .
due to angular momentum conservation , only the terms with @xmath71 and @xmath72 ( i.e. , @xmath73 ) contribute to the matrix element ( [ 3 ] ) . then the amplitude ( [ 3 ] )
can be written as @xmath74\mathbf{\psi}^{i*}_{{\bm k}\lambda}(\bm r)\ , , \nonumber\\ & & \psi^{i}_{{\bm k}\lambda}(\bm r)= [ u^{i*}_{11}(r)\bm \epsilon_\lambda+w^{i*}_{11}(r)\sqrt{4\pi}\bm y_{1\,\lambda}^2(\bm n)]\nonumber\\ & & + \sqrt{5}\ , c^{1\,\lambda}_{2\,0,\,1\,\lambda}[u^{i*}_{21}(r)\bm \epsilon_\lambda+w^{i*}_{21}(r)\sqrt{4\pi}\bm y_{1\,\lambda}^2(\bm n)]\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally we have @xmath75 the first term in @xmath76 contains the large factor @xmath77 while the second term in @xmath78 is small due to the proton mass @xmath24 in denominator .
thus , in the non - relativistic approximation the amplitude @xmath79 reads , @xmath80\bigg\}\ , \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath81 .
the interpretation of this equation is the following . as a result of re - scattering due to the tensor forces
, the pair produced at the origin in @xmath82-wave has a non - zero amplitude to transfer to @xmath83-wave .
the cross section corresponding to the amplitude ( [ 3 ] ) has the form in the center - of - mass frame ( see , e.g. , ref .
@xcite ) @xmath84 is the angle between the electron ( positron ) momentum @xmath43 and the momentum of the final particle @xmath38 . in terms of the `` dressed '' form factors @xmath85 and @xmath86 the electromagnetic sachs form factors ,
corresponding to the contribution of the amplitude with the isospin @xmath87 , have the form @xmath88 \,,\nonumber\\ & & \frac{2m}{q}g_e^i={\cal g}_s^i-\frac{\beta^2}{3}{\cal g}_d^i = g_s^i[u^{i}_{11}(0)-{\sqrt{2}}u^{i}_{21}(0 ) ] \,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus , in the non - relativistic approximation the ratio @xmath89 is independent of the constant @xmath90 , @xmath91 note that the electromagnetic interaction is important only in the narrow region where @xmath92 and the nucleon energy is @xmath93mev . in this paper
we will not consider this narrow region and neglect the electromagnetic interaction in the potential .
then , the amplitude of @xmath94 pair production , @xmath95 , and the amplitude of @xmath96 pair production , @xmath97 , has the form @xmath98 the contribution of the isospin @xmath87 to the total cross section of the nucleon pair production reads @xmath99\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus , to describe the energy dependence of the ratio @xmath100 and the cross section @xmath101 in the non - relativistic approximation , it is necessary to know the functions @xmath102 and @xmath103 .
let us write the hamiltonian @xmath104 for the isospin @xmath87 as follows , @xmath105 where @xmath106 is the spin operator for the spin - one system of produced pair , @xmath107 is the radial part of the laplace operator , and @xmath108 denotes the orbital angular momentum . then the radial wave functions @xmath109 and @xmath110 , @xmath111 , satisfy the equations @xmath112 the asymptotic form of the solutions at large distances is , eq .
( [ asvuw ] ) , @xmath113\,,\nonumber\\ & & w^{i}_{11}(r)=-\frac{1}{2ikr}s_{12}^{i1}\,e^{ikr}\,,\nonumber\\ & & u^{i}_{21}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}s_{21}^{i1}\,e^{ikr}\,,\nonumber\\ & & w^{i}_{21}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}\big[-s_{22}^{i1}e^{ikr}+e^{-ikr}\big]\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ]
it is known that the difference of the cross section of the processes @xmath0 and @xmath26 is small @xcite .
therefore it is natural to suggest that one of the isospin amplitudes is much larger than another one .
1 shows the cross section @xmath114 at @xmath115 ( solid line ) as well as the cross section @xmath27 .
the only free parameter @xmath116 has been found by normalizing the theoretical curve to the data at the third experimental point above threshold . it is seen that the cross section for @xmath28 perfectly reproduces the shape of the data in a wide range of energy near threshold ( from threshold up to @xmath117 gev ) . besides , for this case the value of @xmath118 looks reasonable compared to the value @xmath119 obtained by assumption of isovector dominance .
2 shows the cross section @xmath120 normalized at the same data point .
it is seen that the shape of the theoretical curve does not reproduce the energy behaviour of the measured cross section .
in addition , the value of the fitting parameter @xmath121 does not look reasonable .
3 shows the ratio @xmath122 , see eq.([gegmnr ] ) , together with the experimental data ref.@xcite .
our prediction is in a qualitative agreement with the data .
isoscalar dominance in a model of final - state interaction based on the paris potential has a simple explanation . at very small distances ,
the paris potential corresponding to @xmath123 is strongly repulsive while the potential for @xmath28 is strongly attractive . as a result ,
the wave function for @xmath123 at small distances is strongly suppressed as compare to the case @xmath28 . to conclude , using the paris optical potential
, we show that the isoscalar amplitude dominates in the cross section of the process @xmath124 .
our prediction for the cross section is in good agreement with the data .
the prediction for @xmath122 obtained under assumption of the isoscalar dominance agrees qualitatively with the data . to confirm our statement on the isoscalar dominance ,
other optical potential models should be considered .
the work was supported by the ministry of education and science of the russian federation . | qcd describe low - energy nucleon - antinucleon interaction phenomenological approaches suggested to explain experimental data parameters models extracted from experimental data interest in low - energy nucleon - antinucleon physics stimulated by enhancement decay probability at low invariant mass of @xmath1 in processes @xmath2 natural explanation is final state interaction of proton and antiproton @xcite similar phenomenon observed in investigation proton antiproton electric magnetic form factors in process @xmath10 ratio @xmath11 depends on @xmath12 in energy @xmath13 near threshold of @xmath1 production dependence related to large - scale interaction of proton and antiproton possible to apply approaches of @xcite for explanation of experimental data in process @xmath0 present paper use paris nucleon - antinucleon optical potential @xmath14 form @xcite : @xmath15 part @xmath16 is @xmath17-parity transform of paris @xmath18 potential for long- medium - range distances phenomenological part for short distancesabsorptive part @xmath20 optical potential inelastic channels @xmath21 interaction annihilation mesons essential short distances depends on kinetic energy particles calculations non - relativistic approximation coulomb interaction between proton antiproton important for kinetic energy @xmath22 mev @xmath23 fine structure constant proton mass @xmath25 neglect coulomb interaction difference cross sections @xmath0 @xmath26 small calculate cross sections isospin final states compare with experimental data @xmath27 amplitude with isospin @xmath28 dominates prediction ratio @xmath11 depends on parameters paris potential independent form factor threshold ratio agreement with experimental datanonrelativistic approximation amplitude @xmath29 pair production isospin channel @xmath30 near threshold presented units @xmath31 @xmath32\mathcal g_s^i f_1^i(q^2)_2^i(q g_d^i f_1^i(q_2^i(q @xmath33 @xmath34 virtual photon polarization vector projection spin @xmath35 @xmath36 spin-1 function @xmath29 pair @xmath37 projection spin vector @xmath38 tensor structures eq. s - wave d - wave production amplitudes total angular momentum @xmath29 pair fixed production mechanism functions @xmath39 @xmath40 dirac form factors pair effects final state interaction pronounced @xmath41 behavior near threshold summation polarization nucleon pair averaging polarization virtual photon equations @xmath42 @xmath43 electron momentum aim single out effects final state interactionwrite amplitude ( 2 @xmath44 @xmath45 fourier transform @xmath46 wave function @xmath29 pair coordinate space wave function solution schrdinger equation @xmath47 @xmath48 optical potential @xmath49 left eigenfunction bi - orthogonal non - hermitian operator @xmath50 asymptotic form wave function large distances @xmath51 form factors @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 dirac form factors @xmath55 @xmath56 account final state interaction near threshold smooth functions @xmath41 phenomenological constants introduce vector spherical functions @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 spherical harmonics @xmath60 clebsch - gordan coefficients @xmath61 quantization axes vector @xmath38wave function @xmath46 @xmath62 \nonumber\\{4\pi(2j+3{j\lambda{j+1_{2j}\bm{j{j-1}{2j}{j{j+1}{aligned functions @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 asymptotic form large distances @xmath66}-e^{-i[kr - j\pi/2]}\big{1j}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}}}e^{i[kr-(j-1)\pi/2{1j}=\frac{1}{2ikr{12}{ij}e^{i[kr-(j+1)\pi/2]_{2j})=\frac{1}{2ikr{21}^{ij}e^{i[kr-(j-1)\pi/2]}^i_{2j}(r)=\frac{1}{2ikr}{22}^{ij}e^{i[kr-(j+1)\pi/2{-i[kr-(j+1)\pi/2}{align@xmath67 @xmath68 functions energy @xmath69 angular momentum conservation terms @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 contribute matrix element ( [ 3 ] ) amplitude ( 3 ] ) written @xmath74\mathbf{\psi}^{i*}\bm k}\lambda}( r)\lambda^{i*}_{11}\epsilon_\lambda+w^{i*}{11}\sqrt{4\pi} y{1\lambda}^2( n)\sqrt{5}{1\lambda{2{i*}_{21}\lambda+w^{i*}{21}{4} y{1\lambda}^2( n){aligned @xmath75 first term @xmath76 contains large factor @xmath77 second term @xmath78 small proton mass @xmath24 denominator non - relativistic approximation amplitude @xmath79 reads @xmath80\bigg\{aligned} @xmath81 interpretation equationre - scattering to tensor forces pair produced origin in @xmath82-wave non - zero amplitude to @xmath83-wave cross section to amplitude ( [ 3 ] ) form in center - of - mass frame @xmath84 is angle between electron momentum @xmath43 and momentum final particle @xmath38 form factors @xmath85 and @xmath86 electromagnetic sachs form factors contribution amplitude with isospin @xmath87 form @xmath88} non - relativistic ratio @xmath89 independent of constant @xmath90, @xmath91 electromagnetic interaction important in narrow region where @xmath92 and nucleon energy is @xmath93mev consider region neglect electromagnetic interaction potential amplitude of @xmath94 pair production @xmath95 @xmath96 has form @xmath98 contribution of isospin @xmath87 to total cross section nucleon pair production reads @xmath99{aligned} describe energy dependence ratio @xmath100 cross section @xmath101 non - relativistic necessary know functions @xmath102 @xmath103 write hamiltonian @xmath104 isospin @xmath87 @xmath105 @xmath106 spin operator spin - one system pair @xmath107 radial part laplace operator @xmath108 orbital angular momentum radial wave functions @xmath109 @xmath110 @xmath111 satisfy equations @xmath112 asymptotic form solutions at large distances @xmath113\nonumber\\{11}\frac{1}{2ikr}s_{12}^{i1}{ikr}}{1}{2ikr}s_{21}^{i1}{1}{2ikr}{22}^{i1}e^{ikr}{aligned difference cross section processes @xmath0 @xmath26 small natural suggest one isospin amplitudes larger shows cross section @xmath114 @xmath115 solid line cross section @xmath27 free parameter @xmath116 found by normalizing theoretical curve data third experimental point above thresholdcross section @xmath28 reproduces shape data range energy near threshold up to @xmath117 gev ) value @xmath118 reasonable compared to @xmath119 isovector dominance 2 shows cross section @xmath120 normalized same data point shape theoretical curve reproduce energy behaviour measured cross section value fitting parameter @xmath121 reasonable 3 shows ratio @xmath122 eq.([gegmnr experimental data ref.@xcite prediction qualitative agreement with data isoscalar dominance in model final - state interaction paris potential explanation at small distances paris potential @xmath123 repulsive @xmath28 attractive wave function for @xmath123 at small distances suppressed @xmath28 paris optical potential isoscalar amplitude dominates in cross section @xmath124 prediction good agreement with data prediction @xmath122 isoscalar dominance agrees qualitatively with data confirm other optical potential models considered work supported by ministry of education and science russian federation | 0.553468 | 3,299 | 1,719 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,642 | chiral properties of qcd formulated with the domain - wall fermion ( dwqcd ) are studied using the anomalous quark mass @xmath0 and the spectrum of the 4-dimensional wilson - dirac operator .
numerical simulations are made with the standard plaquette gauge action and a renormalization - group improved gauge action .
results are reported on the density of zero eigenvalue obtained with the accumulation method , and a comparison is made with the results for @xmath0 . | formulation of chiral fermions on the lattice has been one of long - standing problems in lattice field theories .
several years ago , the domain - wall fermion ( dwf ) formalism @xcite , which is a wilson fermion in @xmath1 dimensions with dirichlet boundary condition in the extra dimension , has been proposed as a new formulation of lattice chiral fermion . in the limit of large extra dimension size , @xmath2 , the spectrum of free domain - wall fermion contains massless modes at the edges in the extra dimension .
while the massless modes are shown to be stable in perturbation theory@xcite , their existence may be spoiled non - perturbatively in the presence of dynamical gauge fields .
we studied this issue through an anomalous quark mass @xmath0 in ref .
this quantity measures the magnitude of chiral symmetry breaking with the domain - wall qcd ( dwqcd ) . in this article
we make a status report of our attempt to understand the results on the @xmath3-dependence of @xmath0 obtained in ref .
@xcite through measurements of the eigenvalue distribution of the 4-dimensional wilson - dirac operator .
we define the anomalous quark mass by@xcite @xmath4 this quantity measures the chiral symmetry breaking effect in the axial ward - takahashi identity : @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the axial - vector current , @xmath7 is the pseudoscalar density , and @xmath8 represents the explicit breaking of chiral symmetry . on a smooth gauge field background ,
the anomalous contribution @xmath9 vanishes as @xmath10 at large @xmath3 @xcite .
therefore @xmath0 also vanishes exponentially in this case .
= 7.5 cm in ref .
@xcite , we carried out quenched simulations to study the @xmath3 dependence in detail .
two values of lattice spacing , @xmath11 and 2 gev , are explored , using both the plaquette and an rg - improved gauge actions .
our main results for @xmath0 are summarized in fig .
[ fig : m5q ] .
the results for the plaquette action are obtained at @xmath12 ( @xmath13 gev ) and 6.0 ( 2 gev ) , and those for the rg - improved action at @xmath14 ( 1 gev ) and 2.6 ( 2 gev ) .
solid lines are fits to @xmath15 , and dashed lines to @xmath16 important points to note in fig .
[ fig : m5q ] are : ( i ) comparing results for the spatial sizes @xmath17 and @xmath18 at @xmath13 gev , we find the finite volume effects in @xmath0 to be small , ( ii ) @xmath0 decreases with the lattice spacing , ( iii ) the magnitude of @xmath0 is smaller for the rg - improved action than for the plaquette action , and ( iv ) from data in the range of @xmath3 we explore , @xmath0 seems to remain non - zero in the limit @xmath19 , in all cases except at @xmath20 for the rg - improved action .
if confirmed with studies at larger values of @xmath3 , the last point means that dwqcd realizes chiral symmetry at @xmath21 gev only for the case of the rg - improved action .
chiral symmetry of dwqcd can be studied also through the transfer matrix in the direction of the extra dimension@xcite .
when the transfer matrix has a unit eigenvalue , chiral symmetry is not realized in dwqcd because the left and right chiral modes on the two edges in the extra dimension couple with each other .
a unit eigenvalue of the transfer matrix is in one - to - one correspondence with a zero eigenvalue of the hermitian wilson - dirac operator defined by @xmath22 which is much easier to calculate . here
, @xmath23 is the four dimensional wilson - dirac kernel with a bare mass @xmath24 .
therefore , a failure of exponential decay of @xmath0 would result if @xmath25 develops a zero eigenvalue .
we calculate eigenvalues of @xmath26 by the lanczos method using 50100 configurations at several values of coupling in the range @xmath272 gev using both plaquette and rg - improved actions .
the results from the lanczos method are checked by the ritz functional method for @xmath25 .
we also study the dependence on the lattice size . the maximum lattice at @xmath27 gev is @xmath28 for both actions , while the one at @xmath21 gev is @xmath29 for the rg - improved action and @xmath30 for the plaquette action .
= 7.5 cm = 7.5 cm in figs .
[ fig : evdistp ] and [ fig : evdistr ] we plot monte carlo time histories for the six lowest eigenvalues of @xmath26 for the plaquette and rg - improved actions . in each figure
the left panel shows results for @xmath13 gev and the right panel for @xmath21 gev .
the lattice size at @xmath31 gev is the same as in the previous work of @xmath0 shown in fig .
[ fig : m5q ] .
open squares plot the minimum eigenvalue @xmath32 and filled diamonds are the five higher eigenvalues .
there is a clear trend that the minimum eigenvalues become larger for smaller lattice spacings .
another interesting point is that the rg - improved action gives larger values of @xmath32 than the plaquette action , which indicates that the rg - improved action has a better chiral behavior .
these trends are parallel to the features we noted for @xmath0 in sec .
[ sec : m5q ] .
the spectral density of @xmath25 is defined by @xmath33 where the summation is over the eigenvalues of @xmath25 .
we are interested in the density of zero eigenvalues , @xmath34 , since we expect this quantity to be related to the existence of unit eigenvalue of the transfer matrix . to calculate this quantity
, we adopt the accumulation method proposed in @xcite , which is based on the relation @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the spectral density function for @xmath26 .
we note that , for the small-@xmath37 expansion of @xmath38 in ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) , analyticity of @xmath39 at the origin is assumed .
= 7.5 cm = 7.5 cm = 7.5 cm in fig .
[ fig : acc ] , we show typical examples of the accumulation @xmath38 from the eigenvalue distribution of @xmath26 for the case of the rg - improved action .
results for @xmath34 obtained by a linear fitting following ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) , normalized by the string tension , are summarized in fig .
[ fig : rhob ] .
our results for @xmath34 for the plaquette action are consistent with the previous data by edwards _
results for the rg - improved action show a similar @xmath40 dependence .
a significant difference is that the rg - improved action leads to much smaller values of @xmath34 than the plaquette action , roughly by an order of magnitude .
we have applied the accumulation method to estimate the spectral density at zero eigenvalue of the hermitian wilson - dirac operator , @xmath34 .
we found that this method leads to non - zero values of @xmath34 at @xmath412 gev for both the plaquette and rg - improved actions . at @xmath41 gev ,
the non - zero result for @xmath34 is consistent with the finite @xmath0 in the large @xmath3 limit observed in @xcite with both the plaquette and rg - improved actions . at @xmath42 gev , while a consistency also holds with the plaquette action , there is an apparent contradiction for the case of the rg - improved action since @xmath0 seems to decay exponentially with @xmath3 for this case . in the accumulation data shown in fig .
[ fig : acc ] we observe that results are very noisy at @xmath20 ( 2 gev ) . since the fit results for @xmath34 fluctuates with volume , it is difficult to determine the size dependence .
therefore simulations with larger lattices are needed to check if the slope remains non - vanishing toward infinite volume .
another point to examine is if the analyticity assumption for @xmath39 at the origin is justified if there is a spectral gap .
further studies are required to clarify these points .
this work is supported in part by grants - in - aid of the ministry of education ( nos.10640246 , 10640248 , 10740107 , 11640250 , 11640294 , 11740162 , 12014202 , 12304011 , 12640253 , 12740133 ) .
aak and tm are supported by jsps research for the future program ( no .
jsps - rftf 97p01102 ) .
se , tk , kn , jn and hps are jsps research fellows .
l d. kaplan , phys .
b288 * ( 1992 ) 342 .
y. shamir , nucl .
* b406 * ( 1993 ) 90 .
s. aoki and y. taniguchi , phys . rev .
* d59 * ( 1999 ) 054510 .
y. kikukawa , h. neuberger and a. yamada , nucl .
b526 * ( 1998 ) 572 .
cp - pacs collaboration : a. ali khan _ et al .
_ , hep - lat/0007014 . v. furman and y. shamir , nucl . phys .
* b439 * ( 1995 ) 54 .
h. neuberger , phys . rev .
* d57 * ( 1998 ) 5417 .
y.kikukawa and t.noguchi,hep-lat/9902022 .
r. edwards , u. heller and r. narayanan , phys . rev .
* d60 * ( 1999 ) 034502 . | formulation chiral fermions on lattice in lattice field theories years ago domain - wall fermion formalism wilson fermion dimensions dirichlet boundary condition extra dimension proposed new formulation lattice chiral fermion large extra dimension size spectrum domain - wall fermion contains massless modes at edges modes stable in perturbation theory spoiled dynamical gauge fields studied issue anomalous quark mass @xmath0 measures chiral symmetry breaking with domain - wall qcd article status report understand results @xmath3-dependence measurements eigenvalue distribution 4-dimensional wilson - dirac operator define anomalous quark mass @xmath4 measures chiral symmetry breaking effect axial ward - takahashi identity @xmath6 axial - vector current pseudoscalar density explicit breaking chiral symmetry smooth gauge field background anomalous contribution @xmath9 vanishes as @xmath10 at large @xmath3 @xmath0 vanishes exponentially 7.5 cm ref carried quenched simulations study @xmath3 dependencevalues lattice spacing @xmath11 2 gev explored using plaquette rg - improved gauge actions results for @xmath0 summarized in fig . results plaquette action at @xmath12 6.0 ( 2 gev ) rg - improved action at @xmath14 ( 1 2.6 ( 2 gev ) solid lines to @xmath15 dashed lines @xmath16 comparing results spatial sizes @xmath17 @xmath18 at @xmath13 gev finite volume effects in @xmath0 small @xmath0 decreases with lattice spacing magnitude @xmath0 smaller for rg - improved action than plaquette action @xmath0 non - zero in limit @xmath19 except @xmath20 rg - improved action confirmed larger values dwqcd realizes chiral symmetry at @xmath21 gev for rg - improved action chiral symmetry studied through transfer matrix extra dimension@xcite unit eigenvalue chiral symmetry not realized in dwqcd chiral modes couple unit eigenvalue transfer matrix with zero eigenvalue of hermitian wilson - dirac operator by @xmath22 easier to calculate@xmath23 four dimensional wilson - dirac kernel bare mass @xmath24 failure exponential decay @xmath0 if @xmath25 develops zero eigenvalue calculate eigenvalues @xmath26 lanczos method 50100 configurations values coupling @xmath272 gev plaquette rg - improved actions results checked by ritz functional method for @xmath25 dependence lattice size maximum lattice at @xmath27 gev @xmath28 both actions @xmath21 @xmath29 rg - improved @xmath30 plaquette 7.5 cm monte carlo time histories six lowest eigenvalues @xmath26 plaquette rg - improved actions left panel results @xmath13 gev @xmath21 gev lattice size at @xmath31 gev same as previous work @xmath0 open squares minimum eigenvalue @xmath32 diamonds five higher eigenvalues minimum eigenvalues larger for smaller lattice spacings rg - improved action gives larger values @xmath32 plaquette better chiral behavior trends parallel to features @xmath0 spectral density of @xmath25 defined by @xmath33 summation over eigenvalues @xmath25interested in density of zero eigenvalues @xmath34 related to unit eigenvalue transfer matrix adopt accumulation method @xcite based on relation @xmath35 @xmath36 spectral density function for @xmath26 small-@xmath37 expansion of @xmath38 analyticity of @xmath39 at origin assumed 7.5 cm fig examples accumulation @xmath38 from eigenvalue distribution @xmath26 rg - improved action results for @xmath34 linear fitting normalized by string tension summarized in fig . results plaquette action consistent with previous data rg - improved action similar @xmath40 dependence rg - improved action leads smaller values @xmath34 order magnitude applied accumulation method estimate spectral density at zero eigenvalue hermitian wilson - dirac operator @xmath34 leads to non - zero values @xmath34 at @xmath412 gev plaquette rg - improved actions at @xmath41 gev non - zero result consistent with finite @xmath0 large @xmath3 limit @xcite plaquette rg - improved actions@xmath42 gev consistency plaquette action contradiction rg - improved action @xmath0 with @xmath3 accumulation data fig results noisy at @xmath20 ( 2 gev fit results @xmath34 fluctuates with volume difficult determine size dependence simulations with larger lattices needed slope non - vanishing toward infinite volume assumption @xmath39 origin spectral gap further studies required work supported by grants ministry of education.10640246 10640248 10740107 11640250 11640294 11740162 12014202 12304011 12640253 12740133 tm supported by jsps research future program - rftf 97p01102 ) se tk kn jn hps jsps research fellows kaplan phys . b288 * 1992 ) 342 shamir nucl b406 1993 ) 90 aoki taniguchi phys. d59 1999 ) 054510 kikukawa neuberger yamada nucl b526 * 1998 ) 572 - pacs collaboration a. ali khan hep - lat/0007014 furman shamir nucl phys b439 1995 ) 54neuberger phys rev d57 1998 ) 5417.kikukawa.noguchi/9902022 edwards heller narayanan phys rev d60 1999 ) 034502 | 0.348137 | 2,284 | 1,168 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,643 | we discuss the high temperature behavior of retarded thermal loops in static external fields .
we employ an analytic continuation of the imaginary time formalism and use a spectral representation of the thermal amplitudes .
we show that , to all orders , the leading contributions of static hard thermal loops can be directly obtained by evaluating them at zero external energies and momenta . | in thermal field theory , in order to deal with the infrared singularities which occur at finite temperature , it is necessary to put thermal masses into the zeroth order of a resummed perturbation theory . to this end
, one must first calculate the hard thermal loops , where all the external energies and momenta are much smaller than the temperature @xmath0 .
these loops yield gauge - invariant contributions , which are in general non - local functionals of the external fields @xcite . however , there are two special cases : the static and the long wave - length limits , when the hard thermal amplitudes become local functions , which are independent of the external energies and momenta @xcite .
nevertheless , these two limits give different functions @xcite . of special interest
is the evaluation in the above limits of causal thermal self - energy functions , which determine the high - temperature behavior of screening lengths and plasma frequencies @xcite .
the purpose of this work is to derive a simple method for calculating the leading contributions of retarded thermal loops in static external bosonic fields .
we will show that these contributions can be directly obtained by evaluating the hard thermal loops at zero external energies and momenta .
this result has been previously derived in gauge theories at one - loop level @xcite and verified by explicit calculations at two - loops @xcite . here , we present an argument which is valid to all orders in thermal perturbation theory . the above result may be more readily understood in the analytically continued imaginary - time formalism @xcite which is well suited for the study of retarded green s functions @xcite .
this formalism of thermal field theory defines the bosonic green s functions at integral values of @xmath1 , where @xmath2 is the energy of the @xmath3-th external particle . after performing the sums over the integral values ( half - integral for fermions ) of @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is the energy of the @xmath6-th internal particle , one arrives at bosonic ( fermionic ) thermal distribution functions of the form @xmath7 where @xmath8 is some linear combination of external energies and
@xmath9 is some combination of external and internal momenta .
it is worthwhile to note that if one would now analytically continue the external energies , one would get an analytic behavior when all @xmath10 and @xmath11 become small , leading to a well defined result in the limit @xmath12 .
however , the analytic continuation constructed in this manner would yield , after performing the integrations over internal momenta , factors like @xmath13 which are exponentially increasing for large values of @xmath14 .
the proper procedure which avoids the appearance of such factors makes use of the relation @xmath15 which is valid before analytic continuation , since then , @xmath16 is an integer . in this way , the green s functions will be well behaved when @xmath2 are analytically continued to complex values , and various limits approaching the real axis from different directions may be taken .
but this procedure , in contrast to the previous one , introduces non - analyticities in the thermal loops when @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
nevertheless , the leading contributions of hard thermal loops in the static case @xmath19 , @xmath20 , still agree with those obtained by setting directly in the loops all external energies and momenta @xmath21 .
this agreement occurs only in the static limit which entails that @xmath22 , since then the condition reduces to an identity .
thus , in the static case , analytic continuation preserves the form of the original thermal distribution functions , which lead to an analytic behavior when all @xmath18 . we will first exemplify the above argument in the case of a two - loop thermal amplitude .
next , we shall present a more general approach , based on a spectral representation of the thermal green s functions @xcite , which allows to verify this argument to all orders .
let us consider , for example , a two - loop diagram in the scalar @xmath23 theory , as shown in figure [ fig1 ] .
the result for the one - loop sub - diagram in the renormalizable six - dimensional theory may be written in the @xmath24 where @xmath25 is a polynomial of degree @xmath26 in @xmath27 and @xmath28 ( when @xmath29 , there appear additional logarithmic terms ) and @xmath30 is given by @xmath31-\frac{1}{4\pi^2 } \log \frac{t}{\mu } \right\},\ ] ] where @xmath32 is a renormalization mass scale .
the above one - loop result for @xmath30 has branch points at @xmath33 . when this term is inserted in the two - loop graph of fig .
[ fig1 ] , these branch points coincide with the poles at @xmath33 which arise from the other terms in this diagram .
therefore , in order to perform the @xmath27 integration in a well defined manner , it is necessary to regularize @xmath34 , which we do using dimensional regularization in @xmath35 dimensions .
this leads to the regularized form of @xmath30 given by @xmath36-\frac{1}{4\pi^2 } \log \frac{t}{\mu}\right\},\ ] ] which reduces to eq . in the limit @xmath37 . in eq .
, @xmath38 denotes the angle between the momenta @xmath39 and @xmath40 shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] and @xmath41 denote terms which are well behaved at @xmath33 . using this result in the two - loop graph of fig .
[ fig1 ] , and performing the sum over the integral values of @xmath42 by contour integration , we obtain a leading thermal contribution of the form @xmath43\ ] ] where the anticlockwise contour @xmath44 , along the imaginary @xmath27-axis , is closed in the right half @xmath27 plane .
evaluating the @xmath27-integral in terms of the poles inside @xmath44 , and using the fact that the leading contribution from the pole at @xmath45 in @xmath46 vanishes , leads to the result ( @xmath47 ) @xmath48.\end{aligned}\ ] ] at this point , we note that if one would analytically continue to complex values of @xmath8 , one would obtain an expression which is analytic as @xmath49 , with the limit @xmath50^\prime_{p_0=p } - \frac{n(p ) \pi_t(p , p,\epsilon)}{p}\right\ } , \ ] ] where the prime denotes a derivative with respect to @xmath27 .
however , for the reasons mentioned previously , one must first use in the relation @xmath51 and then make the analytic continuation of @xmath8 .
this procedure will introduce a non - analyticity when @xmath49 . to study this
, we remark that the leading contribution in @xmath0 of the @xmath28-integral in comes from the region where @xmath52 .
thus , in order to find the high - temperature behavior of the hard thermal loop , one may assume that @xmath53 , @xmath54 .
then , it is easy to see that the leading contribution obtained in the static limit agrees with the result given in @xmath55 on the other hand , the leading contributions in the long wave - length limit would lead to a different result , namely @xmath56.\ ] ] let us now evaluate the leading static thermal contribution which arises from . in this case
, there appear individual terms proportional to @xmath57 which exhibit a collinear singularity in the region where @xmath58 , with @xmath39 and @xmath40 being nearly parallel ( see fig . [ fig1 ] ) .
however , such collinear singularities turn out to cancel so that in the present case , it is not necessary to resort to the kln mechanism at finite temperature @xcite . using eqs . and , together with the relations @xmath59 one then gets a leading @xmath60 contribution of the form @xmath61
in order to verify to all orders that the leading static contributions agree with the result obtained by setting directly , in the self - energy , the external energy - momentum equal to zero , it is convenient to use a spectral representation of the analytically continued bosonic self - energy ( see , for example , chapter 3 in @xcite and references therein ) .
one then obtains for the analytic retarded self - energy the spectral form @xmath62 where @xmath8 is a real energy and , for simplicity , only the energy - momentum dependence has been written explicitly . here
, the spectral density @xmath63 is related to the discontinuity of @xmath64 across the real axis and the second term approaches zero when @xmath65 .
these features can be easily seen at one - loop in the scalar @xmath66 model , where @xmath67 and @xmath68.\ ] ] here , @xmath69 and the free spectral density @xmath70 is given by @xmath71 where @xmath72 is the ordinary mass of the scalar particles .
one can check that , by substituting into and performing the @xmath73 integration , one gets the one - loop thermal contribution @xmath74 , \ ] ] where @xmath75 is to be understood and we have neglected @xmath72 with respect to @xmath28 .
this agrees with the result obtained from by setting @xmath76 and employing the relation .
evaluating in the static and long wavelength limits , leads to distinct terms of order @xmath77 . using the spectral representation , where we take for definiteness @xmath78
, we now consider the leading thermal contributions which arise in the long wave - length and static limits of the retarded self - energy @xmath79 @xmath80 next , let us compare these contributions with the result obtained by setting directly @xmath22 , @xmath81 in the retarded thermal self - energy function @xmath82 since the integrand in @xmath83 is not a uniformly continous function of @xmath8 , we can not take the limit @xmath84 inside the integral .
thus , we infer that the leading thermal contribution got in the long wave - length limit , would generally differ from the result given in .
on the other hand , we will argue that in the static case , the limit @xmath85 can be taken inside the integral . to this end , using the fact that @xmath86 is an odd function of @xmath73 , it is convenient to write in the alternative form ( where @xmath87 denotes the principal value ) @xmath88 consider now the integral @xmath89 it is well known that if @xmath90 converges uniformly , then the limit @xmath85 can be taken inside the integral .
such a convergence may be shown by considering the physical meaning of @xmath86 , which gives the imaginary part of the retarded self - energy .
it yields the rates of processes occurring in a thermal plasma , such as particle creation / annihilation or scattering , in the presence of an external field @xcite . at high temperatures , such that
@xmath91 , the leading contributions to these rates have a smooth behavior when @xmath85 , in which case @xmath86 would be a well behaved function in this limit .
furthermore , in consequence of unitarity ( conservation of probability ) such rates should decrease at large values of the energy @xmath73 .
assuming , for example , that @xmath86 behaves for large @xmath73 like @xmath92 , where @xmath44 is a positive constant ( which is consistent with ) , one gets @xmath93 for every @xmath94 , provided @xmath95 is sufficiently large .
a similar condition is obtained also for more general forms of the spectral density at large @xmath73 , which lead to a @xmath77 behaviour of the self - energy at high temperatures .
thus , @xmath90 will be uniformly convergent so that the limit @xmath85 can be taken inside and , therefore , inside the integral @xmath96 .
consequently , it follows that the leading static contribution will agree to all orders with the result , got by calculating @xmath97 at vanishing energy and momentum .
this behavior is in agreement with the two - loop results given in eqs . and .
according to the simple arguments given following eqs . and , the above result should hold as well in the case of higher point functions .
we will now derive this property for the @xmath98-point green s functions , using a treatment which generalizes the previous method .
the spectral representation of the retarded @xmath98-point functions calculated in the imaginary time formalism may be written in the form @xcite where @xmath2 are real energy variables and @xmath100 . setting in , for example ,
@xmath101 positive and all other epsilons negative such that @xmath102 , defines the analytic @xmath6-th retarded function .
the spectral densities are the difference of two thermal wightman functions which , in the case of pure bosonic fields , are given by one may now consider the leading thermal contributions which arise from in the static limit ( when all @xmath106 ) which is well defined due to the analyticity properties of @xmath107 . in this case , to leading order in @xmath0 , one may next take the limits @xmath108 and proceed similarly to the previous analysis .
we then find a result which agrees with that obtained by setting in all external energies and momenta equal to zero : we have explicitly verified this relation at two - loops order , by calculating the leading static thermal contributions of the three - point functions in gauge theories .
thus , we conclude that to all orders in the static limit , the leading thermal contributions of retarded bosonic green s functions may be directly obtained by evaluating them at zero external energies and momenta . | thermal field theory infrared singularities finite temperature thermal masses zeroth order perturbation theory calculate hard thermal loops external energies momenta smaller than temperature loops yield gauge - invariant contributions non - local functionals external fields two special cases static long wave - length limits thermal amplitudes become local functions independent of external energies momenta limits give different functions evaluation causal thermal self - energy functions high - temperature behavior screening lengths plasma frequencies purpose work method calculating leading contributions of retarded thermal loops in static external bosonic fields contributions obtained evaluating thermal loops at zero external energies momenta result derived in gauge theories one - loop level verified by calculations at two - loops present argument valid to all orders in thermal perturbation theory result understood in imaginary - time formalism study retarded green s functions defines bosonic green s functions at integral values of @xmath1 @xmath2 energy of @xmath3-th external particleperforming sums over integral values @xmath4 @xmath5 energy of @xmath6-th internal particle arrives at bosonic fermionic thermal distribution functions form @xmath7 @xmath8 linear combination external energies @xmath9 external internal momenta analytically external energies analytic behavior when @xmath10 @xmath11 become small defined result in limit @xmath12 continuation factors like @xmath13 increasing for large values of @xmath14 procedure avoids factors relation @xmath15 valid before analytic continuation @xmath16 integer green s functions well behaved when @xmath2 continued to complex values limits approaching real axis different directions taken procedure introduces non - analyticities in thermal loops @xmath17 and @xmath18 leading contributions of hard thermal loops case @xmath19 @xmath20 agree with setting external energies momenta @xmath21 agreement occurs in static limit @xmath22 condition reduces to identity analytic continuation preserves form original thermal distribution functions lead to analytic behavior when @xmath18 exemplify argument in two - loop thermal amplitude present general approach spectral representation thermal green s functions @xcite verify argument all orders consider two - loop diagram in scalar @xmath23 theory figure result one - loop sub - diagram renormalizable six - dimensional theory written in @xmath24 @xmath25 polynomial of degree @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 additional logarithmic terms @xmath30 @xmath31-\frac{1}{4\pi^2 } @xmath32 renormalization mass scale one - loop result @xmath30 branch points at @xmath33 two - loop graph branch points coincide with poles at @xmath33 other terms perform @xmath27 integration regularize @xmath34 dimensional regularization in @xmath35 dimensions leads to regularized form of @xmath30 @xmath36-\frac{1}{4\pi^2 } reduces to eq limit @xmath37 @xmath38 denotes angle between momenta @xmath39 @xmath40 fig @xmath41 denote terms well behaved at @xmath33 result two - loop graphfig1 performing sum integral values @xmath42 contour integration obtain leading thermal contribution form @xmath43 anticlockwise contour @xmath44 imaginary @xmath27-axis closed right half @xmath27 plane evaluating @xmath27-integral poles inside @xmath44 leading contribution from pole @xmath45 @xmath46 vanishes leads to result @xmath47 ) @xmath48.{aligned analytically continue complex values @xmath8 expression analytic as @xmath49 limit @xmath50^\prime_{p_0=p } - \frac{n(p ) \pi_t(p p\epsilon)}{p} prime denotes derivative @xmath27 use relation @xmath51 then analytic continuation @xmath8 non - analyticity when @xmath49 leading contribution in @xmath0 @xmath28-integral from region @xmath52 find high - temperature behavior hard thermal loop assume @xmath53 , @xmath54 leading contribution static limit agrees with result @xmath55 leading contributions long wave - length limit lead different result @xmath56. evaluate leading static thermal contribution from .terms proportional to @xmath57 exhibit collinear singularity region @xmath58 @xmath39 @xmath40 nearly parallel fig collinear singularities cancel not necessary kln mechanism at finite temperature @xcite eqs relations @xmath59 leading @xmath60 contribution form @xmath61 verify static contributions agree result setting self - energy external energy - momentum equal to zero use spectral representation analytically continued bosonic self - energy chapter 3 @xcite obtains analytic retarded self - energy spectral form @xmath62 @xmath8 real energy energy - momentum dependence written explicitly spectral density @xmath63 related to discontinuity of @xmath64 across real axis second term approaches zero when @xmath65 features seen one - loop scalar @xmath66 model @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 free spectral density @xmath70 given by @xmath71 @xmath72 ordinary mass scalar particles substituting @xmath73 integration one - loop thermal contribution @xmath74 @xmath75 understood neglected @xmath72 @xmath28 agrees with result setting @xmath76 relation .evaluating static long wavelength limits leads to distinct terms order @xmath77 spectral representation take definiteness @xmath78 consider leading thermal contributions in long wave - length static limits retarded self - energy @xmath79 @xmath80 compare contributions with setting @xmath22 @xmath81 retarded thermal self - energy function @xmath82 @xmath83 not uniformly continous function @xmath8 can take limit @xmath84 inside integral infer leading thermal contribution long wave - length limit differ from result static case limit @xmath85 can be taken inside integral @xmath86 odd function of @xmath73 write alternative form @xmath87 principal value @xmath88 integral @xmath89 if @xmath90 converges uniformly limit @xmath85 taken inside integral convergence physical meaning of @xmath86 imaginary part retarded self - energy yields rates of processes thermal plasma particle creation annihilation external field high temperatures @xmath91 leading contributions have smooth behavior @xmath85 @xmath86 well behaved function in limit unitarity probability rates decrease at large values energy @xmath73assuming @xmath86 behaves large @xmath73 like @xmath92 @xmath44 positive constant gets @xmath93 for every @xmath94 provided @xmath95 large similar condition for spectral density at large @xmath73 to @xmath77 behaviour self - energy at high temperatures @xmath90 uniformly convergent limit @xmath85 taken inside integral @xmath96 leading static contribution with result calculating @xmath97 at vanishing energy momentum behavior with two - loop results in eqs . result should hold higher point functions derive property for @xmath98-point green functions treatment previous method spectral representation of retarded @xmath98-point functions calculated written in form @xcite @xmath2 real energy variables @xmath100 @xmath101 positive other epsilons negative @xmath102 defines analytic @xmath6-th retarded function spectral densities difference of two thermal wightman functions given leading thermal contributions from static limit @xmath106 ) defined due to analyticity properties of @xmath107 leading order in @xmath0 take limits @xmath108 proceed similarly to previous analysisfind result setting external energies momenta equal zero verified relation two - loops order calculating static thermal contributions three - point functions gauge theories conclude all orders static limit leading thermal contributions retarded bosonic green functions obtained evaluating zero energies momenta | 0.498421 | 2,997 | 1,577 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,649 | let @xmath0 be the hyperbolic @xmath1-space with @xmath2 .
suppose that @xmath3 is a discrete , torsion free subgroup and @xmath4 is a point in the domain of discontinuity @xmath5 .
let @xmath6 be the projection map from @xmath0 to the quotient manifold @xmath7 . in this paper
we prove that there exists an open neighborhood @xmath8 of @xmath4 in @xmath9 such that @xmath6 is an isometry on @xmath10 . | let @xmath2 . let @xmath0 be the hyperbolic n - space and @xmath11 its group of isometries .
suppose that @xmath12 is a discrete , torsion free subgroup .
the action of @xmath13 on @xmath0 extends to a continuous action on the compactification of @xmath0 by the sphere at infinity @xmath14 .
the limit set @xmath15 is the set of all accumulation points of the orbit of a point in @xmath0 .
@xmath15 does not depend on the choice of the point and is a subset of @xmath14 ( see @xcite or @xcite for the case @xmath16 ) .
the domain of discontinuity @xmath5 is the complement of @xmath15 in @xmath14 .
the quotient space @xmath7 is a manifold because @xmath13 is torsion free and hence acts without fixed points on @xmath0 ( see @xcite ) .
let @xmath17 be the projection map .
let @xmath18 be the topological metric on @xmath0 induced by its riemannian metric and @xmath19 be the topological metric on @xmath20 induced by its riemannian metric . in this paper
we prove the following theorem .
[ thm;main ] suppose that @xmath3 is a discrete , torsion free subgroup and @xmath21 .
then there exists an open neighborhood @xmath8 of @xmath4 in @xmath9 such that @xmath22 the author would like to thank the referee for many valuable suggestions , in particular , those which simplified the proof of lemma [ lem;lipschitz ] .
suppose that @xmath2 and @xmath3 is a discrete , torsion free subgroup .
let @xmath23 be the compactification of poincar ball model of @xmath0 by the sphere at infinity @xmath14 .
let @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
we write @xmath26 to denote the topological euclidean metric on @xmath27 .
we will make use of the following equation ( see @xcite ) .
suppose that @xmath21 .
due to theorem [ thm;crucial ] , we can choose an open neighborhood @xmath29 of @xmath4 in @xmath37 such that @xmath30 for all @xmath31 . choose @xmath38 such that @xmath39 .
let @xmath40 .
suppose that @xmath41 and @xmath31 .
notice that @xmath42 and @xmath43 . since @xmath44
, we have @xmath45 .
therefore @xmath46 hence @xmath47 a mbius transformation of @xmath48 is a finite composition of reflections of @xmath48 in spheres or planes .
a mbius transformation of @xmath27 is a mbius transformation of @xmath48 that leaves @xmath27 invariant .
we will also make use of the following theorem ( see @xcite , 4.4 , 4.5 ) .
[ mobius ] suppose that @xmath49 and @xmath31 .
then @xmath50 extends to @xmath51 , a unique mbius transformation of @xmath27 ( which we also refer to as @xmath50 ) , where @xmath52 is an orthogonal transformation of @xmath53 and @xmath54 is a reflection in a sphere which is orthogonal to @xmath14 . to get a contradiction ,
suppose that @xmath64 is an infinite set .
recall that @xmath13 does not contain any element which has a fixed point in @xmath0 except the identity . therefore if @xmath65 , then @xmath66 .
hence @xmath67 any orthogonal transformation is an euclidean isometry which fixes @xmath72 .
therefore , for all @xmath73 , from theorem [ mobius ] we have @xmath74 therefore if @xmath73 , then @xmath75 thus , by eq .
( [ eq;b1 ] ) , @xmath76 has an accumulation point in @xmath77 .
this is a contradiction to the fact @xmath60 .
therefore @xmath78 is a finite set . hence @xmath79 .
suppose that @xmath21 . by theorem [ thm;crucial ]
, we can choose an open neighborhood @xmath29 of @xmath4 in @xmath9 such that @xmath30 for all @xmath31 . choose @xmath81 such that @xmath39 .
let @xmath82 . to get a contradiction ,
suppose that for all @xmath83 , there exist @xmath84 , @xmath85 and @xmath86 such that @xmath87 we may assume that @xmath88 for all @xmath83 . for each @xmath83
, let @xmath89 be as in theorem [ mobius ] , where @xmath90 is the reflection in the sphere @xmath91 . by proposition
[ prop;bounded ] , we can choose a constant @xmath92 such that @xmath93 for all @xmath83 .
therefore from theorem [ thm;inversion ] , we have @xmath94 therefore from eq .
( [ eq;l2 ] ) , we have @xmath95 thus @xmath96 .
hence there exists a limit point @xmath56 of @xmath97 such that @xmath98 choose a subsequence @xmath99 of @xmath100 such that @xmath101 .
since @xmath102 and @xmath103 is orthogonal to @xmath14 , we have @xmath104 therefore by theorem [ thm;inversion ] , we have @xmath105 thus @xmath106 contradicting eq .
( [ eq;l1 ] ) .
hence there exists a constant @xmath35 such that @xmath107 suppose that @xmath21 . by lemma [ lem;lipschitz ]
, there exist open neighborhood @xmath8 of @xmath4 and @xmath92 such that @xmath109 note that we may assume that @xmath110 and the boundary of @xmath8 is a sphere orthogonal to @xmath14 , intersected with @xmath27 .
suppose that @xmath112 and @xmath49 . since @xmath110 , we have @xmath113 .
consider @xmath114 and @xmath115 as vectors in @xmath116 and let @xmath117 so that @xmath111 ( see figure [ fig ] )
. since @xmath118 , we have @xmath119 and @xmath120 . therefore by eq .
( [ eq;lip ] ) , we have @xmath121 let @xmath122
. then @xmath123 . by applying proposition [ prop;good ] followed by lemma [ lem;trivial ]
, we can choose an open neighborhood @xmath8 of @xmath4 in @xmath9 and a constant @xmath35 such that @xmath126 for all @xmath127 and @xmath31 .
notice that eq .
( [ eq;m2 ] ) is true for @xmath133 , too .
hence @xmath134 for all @xmath127 and @xmath49 .
therefore from eq .
( [ eq;qmetric ] ) , we have @xmath135 it is clear from eq .
( [ eq;qmetric ] ) , that @xmath136 for any @xmath127 .
therefore @xmath137 for all @xmath127 . | @xmath2 @xmath0 hyperbolic n - space @xmath11 group isometries @xmath12 discrete torsion free subgroup action @xmath13 on @xmath0 continuous action on compactification @xmath0 by sphere infinity @xmath14 limit set @xmath15 accumulation points orbit point @xmath0 on choice point subset of @xmath14 domain of discontinuity @xmath5 complement @xmath15 @xmath14 quotient space @xmath7 manifold @xmath13 torsion free acts without fixed points on @xmath0 @xmath17 projection map @xmath18 topological metric on @xmath0 riemannian @xmath19 topological metric @xmath20 riemannian metric prove theorem @xmath3 discrete torsion free subgroup open neighborhood @xmath8 of @xmath4 in @xmath9 @xmath22 referee suggestions proof lemma @xmath2 @xmath3 discrete torsion free subgroup @xmath23 compactification poincar ball model @xmath0 by sphere at infinity @xmath14 @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 topological euclidean metric on @xmath27equation see @xcite suppose @xmath21 theorem;crucial choose open neighborhood @xmath29 @xmath4 @xmath37 @xmath30 @xmath31 choose @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath31 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 mbius transformation @xmath48 finite composition reflections @xmath48 in planes mbius transformation @xmath27 @xmath48 leaves @xmath27 invariant theorem @xcite 4.4 4.5 ) @xmath49 and @xmath31 @xmath50 extends to @xmath51 unique mbius transformation of @xmath27 @xmath50 ) @xmath52 orthogonal transformation of @xmath53 @xmath54 reflection sphere orthogonal to @xmath14 contradiction @xmath64 infinite set @xmath13 element fixed point in @xmath0 except identity if @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 orthogonal transformation euclidean isometry fixes @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 if @xmath73 @xmath75 @xmath76 accumulation point in @xmath77 contradiction to @xmath60 @xmath78 finite set @xmath79 suppose @xmath21 theorem;crucial choose open neighborhood @xmath29 @xmath4 @xmath9 @xmath30 @xmath31 choose @xmath81 @xmath39 let @xmath82 contradiction @xmath83 exist @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 assume @xmath88 @xmath83 each @xmath83 @xmath89 theorem mobius @xmath90 reflection sphere @xmath91 proposition;bounded choose constant @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath83 theorem;inversion @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath96 limit point @xmath56 of @xmath97 @xmath98 choose subsequence @xmath99 of @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath103 orthogonal to @xmath14 @xmath104 theorem;inversion @xmath105 @xmath106 contradicting eq constant @xmath35 @xmath107 @xmath21 lemma;lipschitz open neighborhood @xmath8 of @xmath4 @xmath92 @xmath109 assume @xmath110 boundary @xmath8 sphere orthogonal to @xmath14 intersected with @xmath27@xmath112 @xmath49 since @xmath110 @xmath113 consider @xmath114 @xmath115 vectors @xmath116 let @xmath117 @xmath111 figure fig @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 eq . eq;lip @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath123 applying proposition prop;good ] lemma lem;trivial choose open neighborhood @xmath8 @xmath4 @xmath9 constant @xmath35 @xmath126 @xmath127 @xmath31 eq . eq;m2 ] true @xmath133 @xmath134 for @xmath127 @xmath49 eq eq;qmetric @xmath135 eq @xmath136 @xmath127 @xmath137 for all @xmath127 | 0.259929 | 1,655 | 956 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,652 | in this work we compare two different approaches to calculation of the three - body resonances on the basis of faddeev differential equations .
the first one is the complex scaling approach .
the second method is based on an immediate calculation of resonances as zeros of the three - body scattering matrix continued to the physical sheet . ,
, three - body systems , complex scaling , resonances | the complex scaling method @xcite invented in early 70-s remains one of the most effective approaches to calculation of resonances in few - body systems .
this method is applicable to an @xmath0-body problem in the case where inter - particle interaction potentials are analytic functions of coordinates .
the complex scaling gives a possibility to rotate the continuous spectrum of an @xmath0-body hamiltonian in such a way that certain sectors of unphysical sheets neighboring the physical one turn into a part of the physical sheet for the resulting non - selfadjoint operator .
resonances appear to be complex eigenvalues of this operator @xcite while the binding energies stay fixed during the scaling transformations .
therefore , when searching for the resonances within the complex scaling approach one may apply the methods which are usually employed to locate the binding energies
. some reviews of the literature on the complex scaling and its many applications can be found , in particular , in @xcite .
here we only mention that there is a rigorous mathematical proof @xcite that for a rather wide class of interaction potentials the resonances given by the complex scaling method coincide with the `` true scattering resonances '' , i.e. the poles of the analytically continued scattering matrix in the unphysical sheets . along with the complex scaling ,
various different methods are also used for calculations of the resonances . among the methods developed to calculate directly the scattering - matrix resonances we ,
first , mention the approach based on the momentum space faddeev integral equations @xcite ( see , e.g. , ref .
@xcite and references cited therein ) . in this approach one
numerically solves the equations continued into an unphysical sheet and , thus , the three - body resonances arise as the poles of the continued t - matrix .
another approach to calculation of the scattering - matrix resonances is based on the explicit representations @xcite for the analytically continued t- and s - matrices in terms of the physical sheet . from these representations
one infers that the three - body resonances can be found as zeros of certain truncations of the scattering matrix only taken in the physical sheet .
such an approach can be employed even in the coordinate space @xcite . to the best of our knowledge
there are no published works applying the complex scaling to the faddeev equations .
therefore , we consider the present investigation as a first attempt undertaken in this direction .
however , the purpose of our work is rather two - fold . on the one hand
, we make the complex scaling of the faddeev differential equations . on the other hand
we compare the complex scaling method with the scattering - matrix approach suggested in @xcite .
we do this making use of both the approaches to examine resonances in a model system of three bosons having the nucleon masses and in the three - nucleon ( @xmath1 ) system itself .
first , we recall that , after the scaling transformation , the three - body schrdinger operator reads as follows @xcite @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the scaling parameter with @xmath4 .
by @xmath5 we understand the six dimensional laplacian in @xmath6 where @xmath7 are the standard jacobi variables , @xmath8 .
notation @xmath9 is used for the two - body potentials which are assumed to depend on @xmath10 but not on @xmath11 . the corresponding scaled faddeev equations which we solve read @xmath12 \phi^{(\alpha)}(z;x)+ v_\alpha({{\rm e}}^\vartheta
x_\alpha)\sum_{\beta\neq\alpha}\phi^{(\beta)}(z;x ) = f_\alpha(x),}\\ \label{faddinhom } & & \qquad\qquad\qquad{\alpha=1,2,3 . } \ ] ] here @xmath13 is an arbitrary three - component vector with components @xmath14 belonging to the three - body hilbert space @xmath15 . the partial - wave version of the equations ( [ faddinhom ] ) for a system of three identical bosons at the zero total angular momentum @xmath16 reads @xmath17 where @xmath18 , @xmath19 and @xmath20 denotes the partial - wave kinetic energy operator , @xmath21 while @xmath22 stands for the partial - wave component of the total wave function , @xmath23 here , @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
explicit expression for the geometric function @xmath26 can be found , e.g. , in @xcite .
the partial - wave equations ( [ fadpartcor ] ) are supplied with the boundary conditions @xmath27 for compactly supported inhomogeneous terms @xmath28 the partial - wave faddeev component @xmath29 also satisfies the asymptotic condition @xmath30 \\ & + & \displaystyle\frac{\exp({\rm i } \sqrt{z}\,\,{{{\rm e}}^{{{\rm i}}\theta}}\rho)}{\sqrt{\rho } } \left[a_l(z;y / x)+o\left(\rho^{-1/2}\right)\right ] , \end{array}\ ] ] for simplicity it is assumed in this formula that the two - boson subsystem has only one bound state with the energy @xmath31 , and @xmath32 represents its wave function .
the values of @xmath33 and @xmath34 are the main asymptotical coefficients effectively describing the contributions to @xmath35 from the elastic @xmath36 and breakup @xmath37 channels , respectively . hereafter , by @xmath38 , @xmath39
, we understand the main ( arithmetic ) branch of the function @xmath40 . in the scaling method a resonance
is looked for as the energy @xmath41 which produces a pole to the quadratic form @xmath42^{-1 } f , f\right>}\ , \ ] ] where @xmath43 is the non - selfadjoint operator resulting from the complex - scaling transformation of the faddeev operator .
the latter operator is just the operator constituted by the l.h.s .
parts of eqs .
( [ faddinhom ] ) .
the resonance energies should not , of course , depend on the scaling parameter @xmath44 and on the choice of the terms @xmath28 .
in the scattering - matrix approach we solve the same partial - wave faddeev equations ( [ fadpartcor ] ) with the same boundary conditions ( [ bc0 ] ) and ( [ hebs ] ) but for @xmath45 and @xmath46 the resonances are looked for as zeroes of the truncated scattering - matrix ( see @xcite for details ) @xmath47 , where the @xmath48 elastic scattering amplitude @xmath49 for complex energies @xmath41 in the physical sheet is extracted from the asymptotics ( [ hebs ] ) .
for numerical solution of the boundary - value problem ( [ fadpartcor][hebs ] ) we employ its finite - difference approximation in the hyperradius - hyperangle coordinates .
a detail description of the finite - difference algorithm used can be found in ref .
in the table we present our results obtained for a complex - scaling resonance in the model three - body system which consists of identical bosons having the nucleon mass . to describe interaction between them
we employ a gauss - type potential of ref .
@xcite @xmath50 + v_b \exp[-\mu_b ( x - x_b)^2]\ ] ] with @xmath51mev , @xmath52@xmath53 , @xmath54fm , @xmath55@xmath53 and @xmath56 .
the figures in the table correspond to the roots of the inverse function @xmath57^{-1}$ ] for @xmath16 and @xmath58 only taken into account . in the present calculation
we have taken up to 400 knots in both hyperradius and hyperangle variables while for the cut - off hyperradius we take 40fm .
one observes from the table that the position of the resonance depends very weakly on the scaling parameter @xmath44 which confirms a good numerical quality of our results .
we compare the resonance values of the table to the resonance value @xmath59mev obtained for the same three - boson system with exactly the same potentials but in the completely different scattering - matrix approach of ref .
we see that , indeed , both the complex scaling and the scattering matrix approaches give the same result .
we also watched the trajectory of the above resonance when the barrier amplitude @xmath60 varied ( see .
[ fig - trajectory1 ] ) . while the complex scaling method was applicable it gave practically the same positions for the resonance . for the barrier
amplitudes @xmath60 smaller than 1.0 only the scattering - matrix approach allows to locate the resonance ( which finally , for @xmath61 , turns into a virtual level ) . as to the @xmath1 system in the @xmath62state where we employed the mti
iii @xcite potential model , both the methods applied give no resonances on the two - body unphysical sheet ( see @xcite ) .
moreover , we have found no resonances in the part of the three - body sheet accessible via the complex scaling method .
thus , at least in the framework of the mti
iii model we can not confirm the experimental result of ref .
@xcite in which the point @xmath63mev was interpreted as a resonance corresponding to an exited state of the triton @xmath64h .
the triton virtual state can be only calculated within the scattering - matrix method but not in the scaling approach .
our present improved scattering - matrix result for the triton virtual state is @xmath65mev ( i.e. the virtual level lies 0.47mev below the two - body threshold ) .
this result has been obtained with the mti - iii potential on a grid having 1000 knots in both hyperradial and hyperradial variables and with the value of cut - off hyperradius equal to 120fm .
notice that some values for the virtual - state energy obtained by different authors can be found in @xcite and all of these values are about 0.5mev below the two - body threshold . | complex scaling method @xcite invented early 70-s remains effective resonances in few - body systems applicable to @xmath0-body problem inter - particle interaction potentials analytic functions of coordinates scaling continuous spectrum of @xmath0-body hamiltonian unphysical sheets neighboring physical turn into part of physical sheet for resulting non - selfadjoint operator resonances complex eigenvalues of operator binding energies stay fixed during scaling transformations searching for resonances apply methods locate binding energies reviews literature on complex scaling applications found in @xcite rigorous mathematical proof for wide class of interaction potentials resonances coincide with true scattering resonances poles of analytically continued scattering matrix in unphysical sheets methods used for calculations resonances approach based on momentum space faddeev integral equations @xcite numerically solves equations continued into unphysical sheet three - body resonances arise as poles of continued t - matrix another approach - matrix resonances based on explicit representations @xcite for analytically continued t- and s - matrices in physical sheetrepresentations infers three - body resonances as zeros of truncations scattering matrix in physical sheet approach in coordinate space @xcite no published works applying complex scaling to faddeev equations present investigation first attempt purpose work two - fold complex scaling of faddeev differential equations compare with scattering - matrix approach in @xcite examine resonances in model system three bosons and three - nucleon @xmath1 ) system after scaling transformation three - body schrdinger operator reads @xcite @xmath2 @xmath3 scaling parameter with @xmath4 @xmath5 six dimensional laplacian in @xmath6 @xmath7 standard jacobi variables @xmath8 @xmath9 for two - body potentials depend on @xmath10 not @xmath11 scaled faddeev equations read @xmath12 \phi^{\alpha)}(z;x)+ v_\alpha x_\alpha)\beta\alpha\phi(z;x = f_\alpha(x),\qquad\alpha=1,2,3 @xmath13 arbitrary three - component vector components @xmath14 three - body hilbert space @xmath15 partial - wave version equations system three identical bosons zero angular momentum @xmath16 reads @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 partial - wave kinetic energy operator @xmath21 @xmath22 partial - wave component total wave function @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 explicit expression geometric function @xmath26 @xcite partial - wave equations fadpartcor supplied boundary conditions @xmath27 supported inhomogeneous terms @xmath28 partial - wave faddeev component @xmath29 satisfies asymptotic condition @xmath30 two - boson subsystem one bound state energy @xmath31 @xmath32 wave function values @xmath33 @xmath34 main asymptotical coefficients contributions @xmath35 from elastic @xmath36 breakup @xmath37 channels@xmath38 understand main arithmetic branch function @xmath40 scaling method resonance energy @xmath41 produces pole to quadratic form @xmath42^{-1 f @xmath43 non - selfadjoint operator complex - scaling transformation faddeev operator latter operator constituted by l.h.s . parts of eqs resonance energies depend on scaling parameter @xmath44 choice terms @xmath28 scattering - matrix approach solve same partial - wave faddeev equations boundary conditions @xmath45 @xmath46 resonances as zeroes of truncated scattering - matrix @xmath47 @xmath48 elastic scattering amplitude @xmath49 for complex energies @xmath41 extracted from asymptotics numerical solution boundary - value problem employ finite - difference approximation in hyperradius - hyperangle coordinates finite - difference algorithm in ref . table results for complex - scaling resonance in model three - body system identical bosons nucleon mass interaction employ gauss - type potential ref .@xcite @xmath50 + v_b \exp[-\mu_b ( x - x_b)^2] with @xmath51mev @xmath54fm figures correspond roots inverse function @xmath57^{-1}$ @xmath16 @xmath58 present calculation taken 400 knots in hyperradius hyperangle variables cut - off hyperradius 40fm position resonance depends on scaling parameter @xmath44 confirms numerical quality compare resonance values to @xmath59mev same three - boson system potentials different scattering - matrix approach complex scaling scattering matrix approaches give same result watched trajectory resonance when barrier amplitude @xmath60 varied fig - trajectory1 complex scaling method gave same positions for resonance barrier amplitudes @xmath60 smaller than 1.0 scattering - matrix approach allows locate resonance @xmath61 turns into virtual level @xmath1 system @xmath62state mti iii @xcite potential model methods give no resonances on two - body unphysical sheet no resonances in three - body sheet accessible via complex scaling method can confirm experimental result ref @xcite point @xmath63mev exited state triton @xmath64h triton virtual state calculated scattering - matrix method not scaling approach improved scattering - matrix result triton virtual state @xmath65mev virtual level 0.47mev below two - body threshold obtained mti - iii potential grid 1000 knots hyperradial variables cut - off hyperradius 120fm values virtual - state energy authors @xcite 0.5mev below two - body threshold | 0.347625 | 2,222 | 1,129 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,654 | the auxiliary field diffusion monte carlo method is applied to compute the spin susceptibility and the compressibility of neutron matter at zero temperature .
results are given for realistic interactions which include both a two body potential of the argonne type and the urbana ix three body potential .
simulations have been carried out for about 60 neutrons .
we find an overall reduction of the spin susceptibilty by about a factor of 3 with respect to the pauli susceptibility for a wide range of densities .
results for the compressibility of neutron matter are also presented and compared with other available estimates obtained for semirealistic nucleon nucleon interactions and with more traditional many
body techniques , like brueckner s or correlated basis function theories . in this paper
we show that the strong correlations induced by realistic nucleon nucleon interactions reduce , by up to about a factor of 3 , the spin susceptibility , @xmath0 , of degenerate neutron matter .
this reduction may have important implications for problems of astrophysical interest , like for instance , neutrino scattering rates in dense matter and , more generally , the study of supernovae and proto neutron stars@xcite .
starting from the pioneering work by sawyer@xcite , several calculations of the neutrino mean free path in uniform nuclear matter have been performed@xcite which show that the effects due to strong interactions are relevant , particularly in the spin - density channel which couples with the axial vector current . a sizable reduction of @xmath0 , or , equivalently , a large value of the @xmath1 landau parameter leads to an appreciable suppression of the gamow teller transitions .
the neutrino momenta and the momentum transfers in many applications are small compared with the neutron fermi momentum , and both energy transfers and the temperature are small compared with the neutron fermi energy .
therefore , the landau parameters of neutron matter at zero temperature are the main quantities to compute in order to evaluate the mean free path of a neutrino in dense matter . in this respect , _ ab initio _ calculations of the landau parameters or related quantities , such as the compressibility @xmath2 , the effective mass @xmath3 or the spin susceptibility @xmath0 , for degenerate neutron matter are extremely important .
such calculations can now be performed because of recent advances in many
body methods , particularly those based on quantum simulations , and because of the much improved knowledge of the nucleon nucleon interaction .
previous evaluations of the landau parameters @xmath4 and @xmath5 ( with @xmath6 ) for neutron matter were based either on skyrme type potential models@xcite or on microscopic calculations performed with semirealistic bare interactions@xcite .
the qualitative behaviour of the compressibility ratio is @xmath7 where @xmath8 the compressibility of the non interacting fermi gas , is similar in most of the various calculations . on the contrary ,
the spin susceptibility ratio , which is approximately related to @xmath1 by @xmath9 may differ up to a factor of 3 at equilibrium density of nuclear matter @xmath10 , and even more at higher densities .
the skyrme models generally predict much smaller values of @xmath1 with respect to microscopic calculations , and become unstable to spin oscillations , driving toward ferromagnetic ground states@xcite , since @xmath11 becomes negative for densities in the range @xmath12 . at small momentum transfer ,
n n correlations enhance the spin
response approximately by a factor @xmath13 .
therefore , skyrme models predict neutrino mean free paths smaller than microscopic models .
on the other hand , the existing microscopic calculations have been performed with old semirealistic interactions , like the reid or the bethe johnston potentials , and no three body force .
in addition , the many body methods used until now may be questionable for the convergence of the underlying perturbation theory as well as for the treatment of spin dependent correlations .
we report the results of quantum simulations of neutron matter for the old reid@xmath14 potential @xcite and modern realistic interactions , based upon the argonne @xmath15 two body potential plus the urbana three body potential , uix , @xcite , denoted hereafter as au18 .
it is well known that such interactions provide a realistic description of light nuclei and nuclear matter @xcite .
the quantum simulations have been carried out by using a new diffusion monte carlo method , the so called afdmc method@xcite .
it introduces auxiliary field variables in the simulation , which makes it the only existing quantum monte carlo method that can handle spin
dependent nuclear hamiltonians and a relatively large number of nucleons . in this approach
the scalar parts of the hamiltonian are propagated as in standard diffusion monte carlo ( dmc ) @xcite .
auxiliary fields are introduced to replace the spin isospin dependent interactions between pairs of particles with interactions between particles and auxiliary fields .
integrating over the auxiliary fields reproduces the original spin isospin dependent interaction .
the method consists of a monte carlo sampling of the auxiliary fields and then propagating the spin
isospin variables at the sampled values of the auxiliary fields .
this propagation results in a rotation of each particle s spin
isospin spinor .
the guiding function , @xmath16 , in our afdmc calculation is a simple trial function given by a slater determinant of one body space
spin orbitals multiplied by a central jastrow correlation .
the orbitals are plane waves that fit in the box times two component spinors , corresponding to neutron up and neutron down states .
the overlap of a walker with this wave function is the determinant of the space
spin orbitals , evaluated at the walker position and spinor for each particle , and multiplied by the scalar jastrow product .
such an overlap is complex , so the usual fermion sign problem becomes a phase problem .
we constrain the path of the walkers to a region where the real part of the overlap with our trial function is positive . for spin
independent potentials this reduces to the fixed node approximation .
this method has already been applied to unpolarized neutron matter and neutron drops ( @xmath17 ) with fairly realistic interactions that include tensor , spin orbit and three body terms .
the neutron matter calculations have been done with up to 66 neutrons in a periodic box with a low variance ( @xmath18 mev per nucleon ) .
the calculation scales in particle number roughly like fermion monte carlo with central forces @xcite .
we compute the spin susceptibility by applying a magnetic field to the system . ignoring any orbital effects ,
the hamiltonian is given by @xmath19 where @xmath20 and @xmath21 , and the susceptibility is defined as @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the number density and @xmath24 is the ground energy in field @xmath25 .
let us use the pauli expansion of the energy per particle as a function of the spin polarization @xmath26 @xmath27 where the derivatives are with respect to the polarization .
minimizing @xmath28 with respect to @xmath29 one gets the following result for the spin susceptibility @xmath30 for a noninteracting fermi gas the spin susceptibility is @xmath31 .
afdmc allows us to get the energy eigenvalue , @xmath32 , for the interacting system in a field @xmath25 for a state of a given spin asymmetry @xmath33 . assuming that the energy and polarization are known in terms of @xmath34 , @xmath35 in eq .
( [ suspauli ] ) can be obtained as a straightforward application of the chain rule @xmath36^{-2 } \left \ { \frac{\partial^2 e_0}{\partial j_z^2 } - \frac{\partial e_0}{\partial j_z } \left [ \frac{\partial p}{\partial j_z } \right ] ^{-1 } \frac{\partial^2 p}{\partial j_z^2 } \right \ } \ .\ ] ] since we are calculating the lowest energy state , the derivative of the energy with respect to @xmath34 vanishes .
therefore this result reduces to @xmath36^{-2 } \frac{\partial^2 e_0}{\partial j_z^2 } \ . \label{esecond}\ ] ] let us consider the non interacting finite systems as a guide for the quantum simulations of the interacting ones .
for such systems the energy is not a quadratic function of the external field @xmath25 . in figure [ f1 ]
we plot @xmath32 , as a function of @xmath25 , for four different systems with a finite number @xmath37 of noninteracting neutrons in a periodic box at @xmath38 .
the cases , for which we have done simulations , are shown in the figure , namely @xmath39=@xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
one can see that the various @xmath44 are linear in @xmath25 and each of them is tangent to the pauli parabola ( which refers to infinite fermi gas case ) at some value @xmath45 of the field @xmath25 .
we also compare in the figure the pauli parabola with the exact result for the fermi gas at that density .
they are very close up to @xmath46 mev .
using eq .
( [ esecond ] ) , one gets @xmath47 for @xmath48 and @xmath49 . in the interacting case , the derivatives in eq .
( [ esecond ] ) can be easily estimated by computing @xmath32 with afdmc , and using the following equations @xmath50 whose validity relies on the following reasonable assumptions : ( i ) for @xmath51 , @xmath32 is quadratic in @xmath34 ; ( ii ) for a fixed @xmath34 , @xmath32 is linear in @xmath25 ; ( iii ) the polarization is linear in @xmath34 .
these assumptions become exact in the limit of an infinite system with @xmath34 and @xmath25 small .
the non interacting case indicates the use of @xmath52 and the value for @xmath45 at which @xmath53 is tangent to the pauli parabola ( for the density @xmath54 of fig .
[ f1 ] , @xmath55 mev ) .
most of our calculations have been carried out with @xmath52 . at @xmath56
we have verified the linearity of @xmath53 on @xmath25 beyond @xmath57mev finding that the result for @xmath58 is largely independent on the value of @xmath45 .
we have also verified the dependence of @xmath58 on @xmath59 , performing simulations with @xmath60 and found that it is very weak .
a time step @xmath61 was sufficient in most of the quantum simulations to obtain agreement between the mixed and the growth energies @xcite within the statistical accuracy .
we have made simulations with the reid @xmath14 interaction ( reid6 ) , the same used in the correlated basis function calculation of ref.@xcite .
our result for @xmath58 , at @xmath62 , is about @xmath63 smaller , which indicates that the cbf perturbative calculations of ref.@xcite , based on jastrow correlated basis functions , either have not reached a satisfactory convergence for the landau parameter @xmath1 or eq ( [ susc_ratio ] ) may not be sufficiently adequate for the reid6 interaction .
we have also considered realistic interactions , characterized by the so called @xmath64 or @xmath65 two body potentials plus uix three body potential , and hereafter denoted as au6 and au8 respectively .
the @xmath65 is a two body potential of the argonne type which includes the four central spin isospin components , plus the four tensor and spin orbit ones .
it fits the nucleon
nucleon experimental data and embodies the main features of the argonne @xmath15@xcite .
the @xmath64 potential is the @xmath65 with its spin orbit components removed .
our results for @xmath58 , obtained with the reid6 , au6 and au8 interactions are given in table [ t1 ] and compared with previous microscopic calcuations of the same quantity .
the brueckner theory calculations of ref.@xcite are performed with the full reid potential , and , therefore are not directly comparable with our reid6 calculations .
however , we do not find a sizable contribution to @xmath58 coming from the spin
orbit component of the two body potential .
our results for au6 and au8 coincide within the statistical error . to address the problem of the influence of the three - body force on the results
we have calculated the spin susceptibility at @xmath54 using the argonne @xmath64 potential and no three body interactions .
we have found that while the energy is reduced by roughly 25 mev per particle , the spin susceptibility ratio is practically unchanged ( 0.31(1 ) ) .
we have also calculated the compressibility @xmath2 , given by @xmath66 where @xmath67 is a polynomial fit to the afdmc energies @xmath68 . for a fermi gas
the compressibility is @xmath69 .
the afdmc results for @xmath70 , obtained with the au6 interaction are shown in table [ t2 ] , where they are also compared with the corresponding cbf estimates ( au6-cbf ) and other existing microscopic calculations@xcite .
for the sake of completeness we show in fig .
[ f2 ] the equations of state of neutron matter , which have been used to compute the compressibility ratio of table [ t2 ] .
the au18 results are taken from ref.@xcite , and have been obtained with the full au18 model interaction , by using variational fhnc / soc methods .
the au6-cbf@xcite results have been obtained by using the au6 interaction , as in the afdmc simulations , and essentially the same many
body technique as in ref.@xcite .
they also include the corrections coming from the lowest order elementary diagram , as discussed in refs .
@xcite .
one can see that the afdmc results for both the equation of state and the compressibility of the au6 model of neutron matter are in reasonably good agreement with those obtained by using cbf theory .
we have estimated the finite size effects in the afdmc simulations by performing variational calculations with the periodic box fhnc method of ref.@xcite .
they indicate a correction which is at most @xmath71 of the mixed energy per particle .
an error of the same size is expected for the compressibilty ratio and of an order of magnitude smaller for the spin susceptibility .
a more detailed discussion of the afdmc calculation and the equation of state of neutron matter will be given elsewhere@xcite .
in conclusion , we have presented new results on the spin susceptibility and the compressibility of neutron matter at zero temperature , which show a strong reduction of these quantities with respect to their fermi gas values .
the calculations have been performed for realistic model interactions , which include tensor , spin orbit and three body terms , and by using the afdmc method , a newly developed quantum simulation technique , capable of dealing with strongly spin dependent interactions .
of particular relevance is the quenching by about a factor of 3 of the spin susceptibility with respect to the commonly used pauli value , found at all the various densities considered .
such a reduction has strong effects on the mean free path of a neutrino in dense matter and should be seriously taken into account in the studies of supernovae and proto neutron stars . | we are indebted to a. fabrocini for providing us the results of the second order perturbative corrections to the energy per particle of neutron matter for the au6 interaction and to c.j .
pethick for insightful discussions .
portions of this work were supported by murst - national research projects and cineca computing center . .
spin susceptibility ratio @xmath58 of neutron matter .
our afdmc results for the interactions au6 , au8 and reid6 are compared with those obtained from refs . [
8,9 ] by using eq([susc_ratio ] ) .
the statistical error is given in parentheses . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] | indebted. fabrocini second order perturbative corrections energy per particle neutron matter au6 interaction c.j . pethick discussions work supported by murst - national research projects cineca computing center spin susceptibility ratio @xmath58 neutron matter afdmc results interactions au6 au8 reid6 compared refs eq([susc_ratio statistical error in parentheses^ | 0.067639 | 151 | 75 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,669 | we present numerical simulations of cold , axisymmetric , magnetically driven relativistic outflows .
the outflows are initially sub - alfvnic and poynting flux - dominated , with total to rest - mass energy flux ratio up to @xmath0 . to study the magnetic acceleration of jets we simulate flows confined within a funnel with rigid wall of prescribed shape , which we take to be @xmath1 ( in cylindrical coordinates , with @xmath2 ranging from 1 to 2 ) .
this allows us to eliminate the numerical dissipative effects induced by a free boundary with an ambient medium .
we find that in all cases they converge to a steady state characterized by a spatially extended acceleration region .
for the jet solutions the acceleration process is very efficient - on the outermost scale of the simulation more than half of the poynting flux has been converted into kinetic energy flux , and the terminal lorentz factor approached its maximum possible value ( @xmath3 ) .
the acceleration is accompanied by the collimation of magnetic field lines in excess of that dictated by the funnel shape .
the numerical solutions are generally consistent with the semi - analytic self - similar jets solutions and the spatially extended acceleration observed in some astrophysical relativistic jets . in agreement with previous studies
we also find that the acceleration is significantly less effective for wind solutions suggesting that pulsar winds may remain poynting dominated when they reach the termination shock . 2 | there is strong evidence for relativistic motions in jets that emanate from active galactic nuclei ( agns ) .
the lorentz factors of blazar jets lie in the range @xmath4 @xcite . in the case of agns
there have indeed been indications from a growing body of data that the associated relativistic jets undergo the bulk of their acceleration on scales that are of the order of those probed by very - long - baseline radio interferometry . in particular , the absence of bulk - comptonization spectral signatures in blazars has been used to infer that jet lorentz factors @xmath5 are only attained on scales @xmath6 @xcite . the first theoretical clues to the necessity of relativistic motion in grb s arose from the compactness problem @xcite .
the requirements that the source be optically thin can be used to obtain direct limits on the minimal lorentz factor , @xmath7 @xcite .
recently , superluminal expansion was observed in the afterglow emission of grb 030329 @xcite .
the main source of power of agn and grb jets is the rotational energy of the central black hole @xcite and/or its accretion disk .
the naturally occurring low mass density and hence high magnetization of black - hole magnetospheres suggests that the relativistic jets originate directly from the black - hole ergosphere as poynting - dominated outflows , whereas the disk surface launches a slower , possibly non - relativistic wind that surrounds and confines the highly relativistic flow .
although , dissipative processes may directly transfer the electromagnetic energy to emitting particles , the commonly held view is that it is first converted into the bulk kinetic energy and only subsequently channeled into radiation through shocks and other dissipative waves @xcite . in the limit of ideal mhd
such conversion can be achieved only via magnetic forces and the efficiency of this mechanism is the main subject of our investigation .
since most of the acceleration takes place far away from the source the space - time is basically flat .
we also use an isentropic equation of state @xmath8 , where @xmath9const and @xmath10 .
since we are interested in the magnetic acceleration of cold flows , we make @xmath11 very small , so the gas pressure is never a dynamical factor .
this relation enables us to exclude the energy equation from the integrated system and overcome the stiffness of relativistic mhd in magnetically dominated regime .
given the condition of axisymmetry the poloidal magnetic field is fully described by the so - called magnetic flux function @xmath12 , the total magnetic flux enclosed by the axisymmetric loop circle @xmath13const .
moreover , for stationary flows there are 5 quantities that propagate unchanged along the magnetic field lines and thus are functions of @xmath14 alone . these are @xmath15 , the rest - mass energy flux per unit magnetic flux ; @xmath16 , the angular velocity of magnetic field lines ; @xmath17 , the total angular momentum flux per unit rest - mass energy flux ; @xmath18 , the total energy flux per unit rest - mass energy flux ; and @xmath11 , the entropy per particle . for cold flows ( @xmath19 , @xmath20 )
we have @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , and @xmath24 where @xmath25 is the lorentz factor , @xmath26 is the magnitude of the poloidal velocity , @xmath27 and @xmath28 are the magnitudes of poloidal and azimuthal magnetic field , @xmath29 is the total electric current flowing through a loop of cylindrical radius @xmath30 , @xmath31 is the ratio of the poynting flux to the matter ( kinetic plus rest - mass ) energy flux , and @xmath32 is the poynting flux per unit rest - mass energy flux .
it is easy to see that the lorentz factor @xmath25 can not exceed @xmath18 .
in the simulation we deal with winds , or unconfined flows , and jets , or flows confined with a funnel . in order to avoid complications due to numerical diffusion through the jet boundary we use solid funnels of paraboloidal shape , @xmath33 where @xmath34 and @xmath30 are the cylindrical coordinates .
the initial configuration corresponds to a non - rotating , purely poloidal magnetic field with approximately constant magnetic pressure across the funnel .
the plasma density within the funnel is set to a small value so that the outflow generated at the inlet boundary can easily sweep it away . in order to speed this process up the longitudinal component of velocity inside the funnel and at the inlet is set to @xmath35 .
in fact , we use the same type of initial and boundary conditions as described in our study of lower magnetization jets @xcite .
we constructed a grid of models with different funnel power geometry ( @xmath36 ) including unconfined wind , different initial magnetization ( @xmath37 ) , and both solid and differential rotation at the base .
figure [ sigma - ev - a1 ] shows the evolution of @xmath31 along the jet boundary for the models with @xmath38 , solid rotation , and the maximum magnetization at the base @xmath39 and 620 ( for solid rotation @xmath40 increases with r ) .
one can see that all solutions exhibit transition to the particle dominated regime ( @xmath41 ) .
prior to reaching the equipartition they are described by the same law @xmath42 and after this the evolution of @xmath31 slows down significantly .
the dependence of the equipartition radius @xmath43 on @xmath40 can be approximated by @xmath44 figure [ gamma ] confirms similar evolution inside the jets .
the normal pressure at the jet boundary is close to @xmath45 , where @xmath46 is the spherical radius . in astrophysical conditions this pressure has to be balanced by the pressure of confining medium .
figure [ gpw ] shows our results for the unconfined wind .
one can see that magnetic acceleration in this case is much less effective in agreement with previous studies @xcite .
the initial energy - to - mass flux ratio of jets in our simulations yields an upper limit on the terminal lorentz factor @xmath47 . in order to make further comparisons of our numerical models with observations we need to select suitable dimensional scales .
the key scale in the problem of magnetic acceleration is the light cylinder ( or the alfvn surface ) radius , @xmath48 .
if the jets are launched by a rapidly rotating black hole in the center of an grb or agn then @xmath49 where @xmath50 . in this estimate
we assume that the angular velocity of the magnetic field lines is half of that of a maximally rotating ( rotation parameter @xmath51 ) black hole .
according to the results shown in equation ( [ req ] ) , the jets enter the matter - dominated regime at a cylindrical radius @xmath52 the corresponding distance from the black hole is @xmath53 where @xmath54 is the jet opening half - angle .
strong shock waves can appear only if @xmath55 .
for grb jets , with @xmath56 and @xmath57 this distance is remarkably close to the radius of wolf - raye stars .
thus , in the collapsar scenario the conditions for development of strong fast shocks and associated gamma - ray emission are already satisfied when the jets break away from the progenitor star .
the actual location of shocks , however , also depends on the scale of the central engine variability which puts it to larger distances .
lower lorentz factor of agn jets imply lower magnetization parameter , @xmath58 .
combined with the black hole mass @xmath59 this gives @xmath60 cm which is similar to the size of the `` blazar zone '' inferred from the observations .
thus , the slow nature of magnetic acceleration of relativistic jets is in very good agreement with the observational constraints .
the velocity profile of jets with a solid body rotation at their base shows strong tangential discontinuity at the jet boundary which favors the photon - breading mechanism of gamma - ray emission from agn jets @xcite . on the contrary , the gradual decline of lorentz factor towards the jet boundary which we see in the models with differential rotation at the base
significantly reduces its efficiency .
this implies that gamma - gay observations can be used to determine whether the agn jets originate directly from the black hole magnetospheres or from the magnetospheres of their accretion discs . like
other researches @xcite we find that magnetic acceleration of highly magnetized unconfined winds is less ineffective .
this is a rather uncomfortable conclusion since the successful mhd model of pulsar wind nebulae @xcite requires the pulsar wind to be particle dominated at the location of its termination shock .
the two possible solutions to this problem suggested so far utilize the alternating structure of magnetic field in the wind from oblique rotators ( ` striped wind ' , @xcite ) .
firstly , the alternating magnetic field can dissipate before reaching the termination shock , e.g. @xcite , with eventual convertion of the released heat into the bulk motion energy . secondly , it can dissipate inside the shock layer of the termination shock itself@xcite . in this case
one can not directly use the standard shock equations in order to determine the downstream state .
in validating the basic features of the simplified semi - analytic solutions , our numerical results go a long way toward establishing an `` mhd acceleration and collimation paradigm '' for relativistic astrophysical jets . in particular , they demonstrate that even jets with extremely high initial magnetization can be effectively accelerated via the ideal magnetic mechanism with more than a half of the poynting flux converted into the bulk motion energy of the flows .
the highest lorentz factor reached in the simulations is @xmath61 which is well within the range deduced for grb jets .
the slow character of magnetic acceleration allows dissipationless energy transport over large distances , the property which is deduced from observations and which is rather difficult to explain in other models of jet generation . | evidence for relativistic motions in jets from active galactic nuclei lorentz factors of blazar jets in @xmath4 @xcite indications relativistic jets acceleration on scales - long - baseline radio interferometry absence of bulk - comptonization spectral signatures in blazars jet lorentz factors attained on scales @xmath6 @xcite theoretical clues to relativistic motion in grb s from compactness problem requirements source optically thin limits on minimal lorentz factor @xmath7 @xcite superluminal expansion observed in afterglow emission of grb 030329 @xcite main source of power of agn and grb jets is rotational energy of central black hole accretion disk low mass density high magnetization of black - hole magnetospheres relativistic jets originate from black - hole ergosphere disk surface launches slower non - relativistic wind flow dissipative processes transfer electromagnetic energy to emitting particles converted into bulk kinetic energy into radiation through conversion via magnetic forces efficiency main subject of investigation acceleration far away from source space - time flatuse isentropic equation @xmath8 @xmath9const @xmath10 interested in magnetic acceleration cold flows make @xmath11 small gas pressure dynamical factor relation exclude energy equation system overcome stiffness relativistic mhd magnetically dominated regime axisymmetry poloidal magnetic field described by magnetic flux function @xmath12 total magnetic flux axisymmetric loop circle @xmath13const stationary flows 5 quantities propagate unchanged along magnetic field lines functions @xmath14 @xmath15 rest - mass energy flux per unit magnetic flux angular velocity magnetic field lines total angular momentum flux per unit rest - mass total energy flux per unit rest - mass entropy per particle cold flows @xmath21 @xmath24 @xmath25 lorentz factor magnitude poloidal velocity magnitudes poloidal azimuthal magnetic field total electric current loop cylindrical radius @xmath30 ratio poynting flux to matter energy poynting flux per unit rest - mass energy flux lorentz factor @xmath25 exceed @xmath18simulation with winds unconfined jets confined with funnel avoid complications diffusion use solid funnels paraboloidal shape @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath30 cylindrical coordinates initial configuration non - rotating poloidal magnetic field constant pressure across funnel plasma density small outflow inlet boundary sweep away speed process longitudinal velocity inlet set to @xmath35 use same initial boundary conditions study lower magnetization jets @xcite constructed grid of models with different funnel power geometry @xmath36 unconfined wind different initial magnetization @xmath37 solid differential rotation base figure shows evolution of @xmath31 along jet boundary models @xmath38 solid rotation maximum magnetization at base @xmath39 620 solid rotation @xmath40 increases all solutions to particle dominated regime @xmath41 equipartition law @xmath42 evolution of @xmath31 slows down dependence equipartition radius @xmath43 on @xmath40 approximated by @xmath44 similar evolution inside jets normal pressure at jet boundary close to @xmath45 @xmath46 spherical radiusastrophysical conditions pressure balanced by confining medium figure shows results for unconfined wind magnetic acceleration less effective previous studies initial energy - to - mass flux ratio of jets upper limit on terminal lorentz factor @xmath47 comparisons need select suitable dimensional scales key scale magnetic acceleration is light cylinder radius @xmath48 jets launched by rapidly rotating black hole angular velocity of magnetic field lines half of maximally rotating black hole jets enter matter - dominated regime at cylindrical radius @xmath52 distance from black hole is @xmath53 @xmath54 is jet opening half - angle strong shock waves appear @xmath55 for grb jets distance close to radius of wolf - raye stars collapsar scenario conditions for strong fast shocks gamma - ray emission satisfied when jets break away from progenitor star location of shocks depends on central engine variability lower lorentz factor of agn jets lower magnetization parameter with black hole mass @xmath59 gives @xmath60 cm similar to size blazar zone '' from observationsslow magnetic acceleration of relativistic jets with observational constraints velocity profile of jets with solid body rotation shows tangential discontinuity at jet boundary favors photon - breading mechanism gamma - ray emission from agn jets decline of lorentz factor towards jet boundary differential rotation reduces efficiency implies gamma - gay observations determine agn jets originate from black hole magnetospheres or magnetospheres accretion discs magnetic acceleration of highly magnetized unconfined winds less ineffective uncomfortable conclusion mhd model pulsar wind requires pulsar wind particle dominated at termination shock two solutions utilize alternating structure magnetic field in wind from oblique rotators alternating magnetic field can dissipate before termination shock released heat into bulk motion energy dissipate inside shock layer termination shock use standard shock equations determine downstream state numerical results mhd acceleration and collimation paradigm for relativistic astrophysical jets demonstrate jets with high initial magnetization can be accelerated via ideal magnetic mechanism with half poynting flux converted into bulk motion energyhighest lorentz factor @xmath61 within range deduced grb jets slow magnetic acceleration allows dissipationless energy transport large distances deduced observations difficult explain models jet generation | 0.362018 | 2,154 | 1,067 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,679 | the frequency dependent conductance of a two - dimensional quantum wire is computed using a current conserving formalism .
the correction to the dc - conductance due to a time - dependent potential is related to the local partial density of states which we compute numerically .
the current conservation is explicitly confirmed by computing the global density of states and comparing it with a quantity which is related to the electron dwell time .
our calculation clearly reveals the physical meaning of the various partial density of states .
= 10000 the physics associated with quantum conduction in various low dimensional systems has been a major focus in current solid state research . due to advances in controlled crystal growth and lithographic techniques , it is now possible to fabricate various two - dimensional submicron structures where accurate experimental measurements can be made@xcite . on the theoretical side ,
the understanding of quantum transport in these very small systems has been advanced by the landauer theory@xcite of one - dimensional transport . in cases where multi - probes are attached to the conductor
, bttiker has provided the useful formula for computing various conductances@xcite .
the landauer - bttiker formalism has been applied to a large class of quantum transport problems in the mesoscopic and ballistic regimes where the external potential is static . on the other hand ,
when external potential has a time - dependent oscillating component , the landauer - bttiker formalism can not be directly applied . as shown by bttiker and his co - workers@xcite that a direct application of the original approach of landauer - bttiker formalism , where the internal electric potential distribution is not needed , can not yield electric current and charge conservation .
hence the coherent quantum transport theory for mesoscopic and ballistic conductors must be extended when time - varying external potentials are to be included . clearly
the problem of computing frequency dependent conductance for mesoscopic and ballistic conductors is a very important subject from both theoretical and application points of view .
recently in a series of articles , bttiker and co - workers@xcite have developed a theoretical formalism for investigating frequency - dependent coherent quantum transport for mesoscopic and ballistic conductors when electric potential in the leads far away from the scattering region of the conductor is time varying .
this is an important advance in the theory of mesoscopic physics and warrant further development of the theory and application . in
simple one dimensional systems such as a @xmath0function potential , a perfect quantum wire , or an 1d quantum well , the frequency dependent admittance can be explicitly calculated since the scattering matrix can be obtained analytically@xcite .
however , in truly 2d systems the application of the formalism is less straightforward . this is due partly to technical difficulties of computing certain quantities such as the various partial density of states ( pdos , see below ) .
these quantities , which appear naturally in the theoretical formulation of the problem@xcite , have deep physical meaning which is not obviously clear and needs to be revealed .
to the best of our knowledge , there are so far no studies and direct calculations@xcite of the various partial density of states in 2d .
but these quantities must be obtained if the frequency dependent admittance is to be computed from first principles .
the purpose of this paper is to report our investigations on the dynamic transport properties of a 2d quantum wire system .
in particular , we consider a t - shaped quantum wire structure as shown in fig .
( 1 ) .
the two probes extend to @xmath1 while the scattering region is provided by the t - shaped junction as shown being bounded by the two dotted lines .
this 2d quantum wire has been studied by many authors@xcite for the case of static transport . while this is a simple 2d system
, we found that much physical intuition about various quantities can be obtained for the dynamic transport ( see below ) .
we have computed the frequency dependent admittance for this system using the current conserving formalism of ref .
@xcite .
the correction to the dc - conductance due to a time - dependent potential is related to the local partial density of states which we compute numerically .
the current conservation is explicitly confirmed by computing the global density of states and comparing it with a quantity which is related to the electron dwell time .
our direct calculation clearly reveals the physical meaning of the partial density of states which plays an essential role in the dynamic transport theory . for the sake of presentation we briefly review the current conserving dynamic transport formalism of bttiker , thomas , prtre , gasparian and christen@xcite .
their theory proceeds in three steps .
the first step is to determine the current and charge density response of the system to the time - variation of the external potential .
this leads to an admittance matrix with elements given by , to first order in @xmath2 , @xmath3 where the first term on the right hand side is the admittance ( conductance ) when frequency @xmath4 and this term is given by the usual bttiker multi - probe conductance formula@xcite .
the second term gives a correction due to the time - dependence of the external potential , and is determined by the global partial density of states@xcite ( global pdos ) , @xmath5 .
here the indices @xmath6 denote scattering from a probe labeled by @xmath7 to that labeled by @xmath8 .
this admittance matrix @xmath9 does not conserve current , since @xmath10 . to correct this problem
, one must consider the internal potential distribution induced by the external perturbation .
this is computed in the second step of the theory@xcite , and the result is rather simple if only thomas - fermi linear screening is included . in the final step ,
one computes the currents in the probes induced by this internal potential distribution , which leads to an additional term in the admittance matrix .
thus the total admittance is given by @xmath11 , with @xmath12 and @xmath13 \left[\frac{dn({\bf r})}{de}\right]^{-1 } \left[\frac{dn({\bf r},\beta)}{de}\right]\ \ \ . \label{dab}\ ] ] in eq .
( [ dab ] ) the quantity @xmath14 is the _ injectivity _ which measures the additional local charge density brought into the sample by the oscillating chemical potential at probe @xmath8 . without a magnetic field ,
the _ emissivity _ @xmath15 equals to the injectivity .
it was shown@xcite that these quantities could be computed from the electron dwell time or the scattering green function .
finally , the total local density of states is @xmath16 . with these expressions ,
we obtain the final formula for the frequency dependent admittance to linear order in @xmath2 , @xmath17 it is now straightforward to prove that current is conserved since the admittance matrix @xmath18 satisfies @xmath19 .
this can be seen by realizing that @xmath20 is the injectance which is identical to @xmath21 .
let s apply this formalism to the t - shaped 2d conductor .
the incident electron comes from probe 1 , it scatters at the t - junction , and then reflects back to probe 1 or transmits to probe 2 . to be concrete
we have fixed the wire width to be @xmath22 , the width and height of the side stub are fixed at @xmath23 and @xmath24 with @xmath25 .
the units are fixed by @xmath26 with @xmath27 the effective mass of the electron , and lengths measured in terms of @xmath22 . for simplicity
we have focused on the first _ transport _ subband only , thus the incoming electron energy is restricted : @xmath28 . in this case elements of the scattering matrix @xmath29 are simple complex numbers . with more than one subbands
they become matrices in the subband space .
however the computation proceeds in similar fashion with one or more than one subbands .
we have solved the quantum scattering problem using a mode matching method@xcite , where the wavefunction in the scattering region was expanded using a suitable basis set and in particular @xmath30 modes were included .
we have checked the convergence that including more modes in the scattering region essentially does not change the results .
the scattering probabilities were obtained by matching the wavefunctions and their derivatives at the boundaries between the scattering region and the probes . to compute the admittance we need to know various partial density of states .
these quantities turn out to have very interesting and physically clear property once they are plotted .
the global pdos is related to the scattering matrix , and is approximately given by@xcite @xmath31 for a finite scattering volume there are corrections to this expression of the order @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the electron wavelength and @xmath34 the system size@xcite . for large system sizes or large energies , eq .
( [ gpdos ] ) is adequate .
later when we check the current conservation , the correction term will be added . since in 2d
the expression for the scattering matrix can not be written down analytically , we have decided to perform the energy derivatives of ( [ gpdos ] ) numerically .
in particular we computed @xmath35 at various values of energy @xmath36 and used a @xmath37-point numerical derivative to find @xmath38 . the behavior of the global pdos is plotted in fig .
( 2 ) together with the transmission coefficient @xmath39 . as our quantum wire system is very transmissive , @xmath40 has large values in general except at the two resonance levels where @xmath41 . in a previous work we have shown that the energies where @xmath41 corresponds to the quasi - bound states located in the t - junction@xcite .
the behavior of the global partial density of states coincides well with that of the transmission coefficients .
in particular @xmath42 , which is the global pdos for reflection , peaks at the energies where transmission coefficient is minimum or reflection maximum . on the other hand ,
@xmath43 , which is the global pdos for transmission , takes minimum value when @xmath44 is minimum .
indeed , a general discussion for an one - dimensional system with a symmetric scatterer@xcite reveals that @xmath45 while @xmath46 with @xmath47 and @xmath44 the reflection and transmission coefficients , and @xmath48 the global dos .
hence these quantities have vivid physical meaning .
the next quantity of interest is @xmath49 given by eq .
( [ dab ] ) . to compute this quantity
, we first find the injectivity which is given by the scattering wavefunction@xcite in the t - junction , at zero temperature this is given by @xmath50 where @xmath51 is the incoming particle flux .
clearly a spatial integration of this quantity gives the electron dwell time@xcite @xmath52 .
in general @xmath49 is obtained with two calculations of the wavefunction for particles coming from left and from right .
fig .
( 3 ) shows this quantity as a function of the electron energy .
both @xmath53 and @xmath54 peak at the energies where the transmission takes the minimum values .
this is understandable since these special energies correspond to the scattering states@xcite where the electron dwell time takes maximum value , and the injectivity represents essentially the electron dwelling in an area @xmath55 at position @xmath56 irrespective where it is finally scattered . with the global partial density states and the quantity @xmath49 calculated , we have thus obtained the admittance @xmath57 from eqs .
( [ ge ] ) , ( [ gi ] ) , and ( [ gfinal ] ) . fig .
( 4 ) shows the @xmath2-dependent part of @xmath18 , @xmath58 as a function of energy @xmath36 .
apart from the prefactor @xmath59 , this quantity @xmath60 is the imaginary part of the admittance , and is called _ emittance_. at the quasi - bound state levels where transmission coefficient @xmath39 takes minimum values , @xmath61 also takes extremal values .
it is interesting to observe that the transmissive part @xmath62 takes minimum value where @xmath63 , while the reflective part @xmath64 takes maximum value at the same energy .
thus in this sense , the dynamic part of the admittance @xmath65 has the same behavior as the static admittance @xmath66 as a function of energy .
furthermore , @xmath65 changes sign as energy is varied : the system responds either capacitively when @xmath67 , or inductively otherwise . hence at the resonance ( where @xmath68 for our system ) @xmath62 and @xmath64 are capacitive .
fig .
( 4 ) shows the clear crossover between the capcitive and inductive responses for this 2d quantum wire as energy is changed .
we can now explicitly confirm the current conservation by summing up the admittance matrix elements and check whether or not @xmath69 .
since the global pdos obtained using eq .
( [ gpdos ] ) is not exact , a correction should be added .
for an 1d system gasparian _ et .
al._@xcite have shown that @xmath70 where @xmath36 is the electron energy .
unfortunately for a 2d system such as ours , the green s function can not be written down analytically hence how to derive a similar correction term as that in ( [ conservation ] ) is unclear .
however since we have numerical results of all the quantities , a reasonable correction term can easily be obtained .
we found that the same form as ( [ conservation ] ) led to almost perfect current conservation , provided we use the _ transport _ energy @xmath71 as the energy @xmath36 in ( [ conservation ] ) . our data in fig .
( 5 ) clearly and unambiguously shows that the following is established @xmath72 with this result , we have thus explicitly shown@xcite the current conservation @xmath73 . since the correction term is inversely proportional to @xmath71 , it plays a role only at small @xmath74 .
this can already be seen in fig .
( 4 ) where the two curves add up to zero except at low energies . in summary
we have , for the first time , implemented the current conserving dynamic conductance formalism for 2d metallic conductors . in the simple case of applying thomas - fermi linear screening for the interacting electrons ( hence the analysis is more suitable for metallic samples ) , the current response to the internal potential can be computed from the electron dwell time using the scattering wavefunctions .
the frequency dependent admittance of a t - shaped 2d quantum wire is calculated to linear order in frequency .
we have explicitly confirmed the electric current conservation and found that a correction to the total density of states is needed at low energies , in the same fashion as that of 1d case .
it is very interesting to clarify the physical meaning of the partial dos .
these quantities provide information on the density of carriers _ and _ the transmission of carriers from one contact to another . at quantum resonances
these quantities take extremal values .
there are many further applications of this important theoretical formalism , to situations involving multi - mode , magnetic fields , and non - linear screening .
another very challenging extension is to push the theory to higher order in frequency@xcite and formulate the theory in a way that permits a computational implementation .
we hope to be able to report these results in the future . | we thank prof .
m. bttiker for helpful communications and discussions .
we gratefully acknowledge support by a rgc grant from the government of hong kong under grant number hku 261/95p , the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada and le fonds pour la formation de chercheurs et laide la recherche de la province du qubec .
we thank the computer center of the university of hong kong for computational facilities .
m. bttiker , a. prtre and h. thomas , phys .
lett . * 70 * , 4114 ( 1993 ) ; m. bttiker and h. thomas , in _ quantum - effect physics , electronics and applications _ , eds .
k. ismail _ et .
( institute of physics conference series number 127 , bristol , 1992 ) , pp .
19 .
al . _ have investigated dynamic magnetoconductance of a quasi-1d dirty wire using a phenomenological constant to account for the self - consistent internal potential response , rather than using the full theory by computing the local density of states .
liu , ben yu - kuang hu , c.a .
stafford and s. das sarma , phys .
b * 50 * , 5799 ( 1994 ) .
near the second subband threshold , there seems to be a small but systematic deviation to the equal sign of eq .
( [ final ] ) .
this deviation could be due the fact that transmission probability has sharp changes in its value near the onset of the second subband and eq .
( [ final ] ) does not include multi - propagating modes . | thank prof bttiker communications discussions acknowledge support rgc grant government hong kong 261/95p natural sciences engineering research council canada fonds formation chercheurs province qubec thank computer center university hong kong for computational facilities m. bttiker a. prtre h. thomas phys . lett * 70 *, 4114 ( 1993 ) h thomas quantum - effect physics electronics applications eds k. ismail institute physics conference series 127 bristol 1992 pp 19 investigated dynamic magnetoconductance quasi-1d dirty wire using phenomenological constant - internal potential response liu ben yu - kuang hu stafford s. das sarma phys . * 50 * , 5799 ( 1994 ) second subband threshold small deviation to equal sign eq . deviation due transmission probability onset second subband include multi - propagating modes | 0.073683 | 357 | 182 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,680 | we present results for 2d and 4d systems on lattices with topology homotopic to the surface of a ( hyper ) sphere @xmath0 or @xmath1 .
finite size scaling is studied in situations with phase transitions of first and second order type .
the ising and potts models exhibit the expected behaviour ; for the 4d pure gauge @xmath2 theory we find consistent scaling indicative of a second order phase transition with critical exponent @xmath3 . | some time ago it was suggested to study certain systems on lattices with trivial first homotopy group @xcite .
the d - dimensional boundaries of ( d+1)-dimensional hypercubes have this property , being homotopic to @xmath4 . here
we give a brief summary of recent results obtained by various subgroups of the present authors for such studies for compact @xmath2 pure gauge theory with mixed action @xcite , for the 2d ising model @xcite and for the 2d potts model @xcite .
the original motivation was to check the possible relevance of periodic boundary conditions for the dynamics of looplike excitations ( like monopole loops in compact u(1 ) gauge theory ) . in the thermodynamic limit at the critical point
the manifold becomes flat and should lead to a universal field theory independent of the details of the boundary conditions .
other 2d studies on similar lattices include random as well as tetrahedral lattices @xcite and a recent investigation of the 7-vertex model ( the strong coupling schwinger model ) for a pillow - like topology @xcite .
we studied the following lattices : @xmath5}$ ] : : periodic b.c .
, i.e. torus topology for the @xmath6 hypercubic lattice @xmath7}$ ] : : the surface of a @xmath8-dimensional @xmath9 hypercube , or its dual lattice @xmath10 ( where points of @xmath11 are identified with @xmath12dimensional objects of @xmath10 etc . ) @xmath13}$ ] : : like @xmath11 but with weight factors correcting for a spherelike , smooth distribution of the curvature over the lattice @xmath14}$ ] : : a pillow - like shape , like the surface of a @xmath15 hypercube ; may be visualized as two copies of a @xmath6 hypercube glued together at their boundaries in the finite size scaling ( fss ) analyses we use @xmath16 as the generic lattice size parameter , where the volume @xmath17 denotes the number of sites or plaquettes on 2d or 4d lattices , respectively .
the monte carlo updating details depend on the studied system and are discussed below . in all cases
bulk quantities were obtained at various values of the coupling and combined with the multihistogram method @xcite , giving @xmath18 this allows us to obtain continuous curves for the observables and to determine the complex positions of the partition function zeroes .
also the combined data for the `` multihistogram '' provides for a reliable identification of possible 2-state signals in the distribution .
we studied the peak positions ( pseudocritical couplings @xmath19 ) and peak values of the cumulants @xmath20 and the positions @xmath21 of the fisher zeroes closest to the real axis . for 1@xmath22 order transitions
one expects the fss behaviour @xmath23 with `` surface '' corrections of @xmath24 due to the inhomogeneities of the boundary ( curvature ) ; in @xmath25 this is the leading term @xcite .
the parameter @xmath26 in ( [ pscfss ] ) depends on the considered cumulant . for 2@xmath27 order transitions we expect @xmath28 with josephson s law @xmath29 ( for gaussian systems @xmath30 ; for a discontinuous transition @xmath31 ) . again in @xmath19 one expects `` surface '' corrections of @xmath24 .
this was studied in @xcite in order to identify the fss effects of the new topology in more detail .
we used lattices of various size and of type @xmath32 ( where there exists an analytic solution ) , @xmath33 , @xmath34 and @xmath35 .
the updating was with the swendsen - wang cluster algorithm with typically @xmath36 measured configurations ( with an autocorrelation time @xmath37 ) per lattice size .
the results were typical for the other systems as well . since @xmath38 one expects a leading fss behaviour @xmath39 .
the pseudocritical points for the spherelike topologies are compared to the torus values very close to their thermodynamic values and exhibited a _ very small _
contribution @xmath39 ; the scaling behaviour is dominated by the non - leading term @xmath40 which we interpret as coming from the boundary or curvature , respectively .
this holds also for the real part of the closest fisher zero .
both , the peak value of @xmath41 as well as @xmath42 , however , show scaling in perfect agreement with @xmath38 . from fig .
[ fig1 ] we find , that for the spherelike topology the zeroes approach the real axis in the complex coupling constant plane almost perpendicularly .
thus the real part ( related to the pseudocritical points derived from the cumulants ) is always very close to the thermodynamic value with its scaling behaviour dominated by the @xmath40 term .
in @xcite the @xmath43-state potts model for @xmath44 at the ( for @xmath45 extremely weak ) 1@xmath22 order transition is studied with multicanonical updating @xcite , typically @xmath36 updates for each lattice size .
the lattices were of type @xmath46 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
even for the weak signal of the @xmath45 model the histogram for the energy distribution exhibits a clear double peak structure ( cf .
[ fig2 ] ) .
thus the spherical lattices do no `` wash out '' weak 2-state signals , as might be suspected .
note that there is only one interface as compared to two for the periodic boundary conditions .
this difference may be of some technical advantage in the determination of the interface tension .
the study @xcite of compact @xmath2 pure gauge action in the wilson formulation with an additional adjoint term ( coupling @xmath49 ) has been continued@xcite .
for @xmath50 , studies for torus geometry find consistently stable 2-state signals , reconfirmed by the recent results of @xcite and @xcite ( who in particular emphasized the rle of monopole clusters for the phase transition ) . already in 1985 a careful study of this action at positive @xmath49 hinted at a tricritical point ( tcp ) @xcite near @xmath51 .
however , 2-state signals have been observed even below that value @xcite . on the other hand ,
studies for spherelike topology show no 2-state signals in the energy distribution at @xmath52 @xcite for the studied lattices @xmath53 ( although they do show 2 states at e.g. @xmath54 ) . in order to respond to a possible criticism of our original investigation of the model on @xmath11-lattices where the curvature was concentrated on the edges and corners of the hypercubic lattice we have continued work on an `` almost smooth sphere '' @xmath55 .
there we project sites , links and plaquettes of @xmath56 or @xmath57 ( dual ) onto the surface of 4d spheres and introduce weight factors similar to those used by @xcite in their study of random triangulated lattices , @xmath58\;.\ ] ] here , @xmath59 and @xmath60 denote the areas of the corresponding plaquette ( and its dual , respectively ) of the projected lattice .
more technical details of the simulation have been discussed @xcite and will be discussed elsewhere @xcite . we have worked with lattices @xmath55 for @xmath61 ranging between 4 and 12 .
the couplings were chosen in the immediate neighbourhood of the critical values of @xmath62 for @xmath63 .
since we never observed 2-state signals we did not implement multi - canonical updating . for each lattice size
we typically accumulated @xmath64 updates ( 3-hit metropolis , for @xmath50 with an additional overrelaxation step ) .
close to the phase transition we found quite large autocorrelation lengths ( 300 - 2000 ) .
we find no indication of 2-state signals in the multi - histogram distributions .
the values of the cumulants at their respective extrema are compatible with a continuous phase transition . like for the ising model , also here we observe in general smaller fs corrections than for the torus geometry ( periodic b.c . ) .
the leading behaviour seems to be dominated again by the boundary or curvature term , i.e. suppressed by @xmath40 , which at first sight can not be distinguished from a leading scaling behaviour for @xmath65 .
the peak values of @xmath41 show power law behaviour and in the table we give the range of values for @xmath66 ( and the resulting @xmath67 , if we use josephson s law ) from fits to data for all lattice sizes or without the largest and/or smallest lattices . these values appear to depend on @xmath49 .
one has to keep in mind , however , that the fss law used for this fit is asymptotic and that there is a regular contribution to the value of @xmath41 which may be non - negligible for the lattice sizes entering the fit .
if we study the closest fisher zeroes ( in the complex @xmath62-plane ) , we find a behaviour reminiscent to the discussed ising results .
[ fig3 ] exhibits fss consistent with @xmath69 for all three values of @xmath49 ( cf .
the results of the fit in table [ tabfit ] ) .
once again @xmath68 gives the cleanest and most consistent result .
we should mention , that this value of @xmath67 is compatible with neither the gaussian value 0.5 nor the `` discontinuity '' value 0.25 ; it is compatible with results obtained in the mid-80s with mcrg methods .
more detailed analyses with improved statistics will be presented elsewhere @xcite . | suggested study systems lattices trivial first homotopy group @xcite d - dimensional boundaries d+1)-dimensional hypercubes property homotopic to @xmath4 summary recent results subgroups compact @xmath2 gauge theory mixed action 2d ising model 2d potts model original motivation check relevance periodic boundary conditions dynamics looplike excitations gauge theory thermodynamic limit critical point manifold becomes flat universal field theory independent boundary conditions other 2d studies lattices include random tetrahedral lattices investigation 7-vertex model pillow - like topology studied lattices @xmath5}$ periodic b.c torus topology @xmath6 hypercubic lattice @xmath7}$ surface @xmath8-dimensional @xmath9 hypercube dual lattice @xmath10 points @xmath11 identified @xmath12dimensional objects @xmath10@xmath13}$ like @xmath11 weight factors correcting spherelike smooth distribution curvature lattice @xmath14}$ pillow - like shape surface @xmath15 hypercube visualized two copies @xmath6 hypercube glued finite size scaling analyses @xmath16 lattice size parameter volume @xmath17 number sites on 2d or 4d lattices monte carlo updating details depend studied system discussed bulk quantities obtained values coupling combined multihistogram method @xcite @xmath18 continuous curves determine complex positions partition function zeroes combined data reliable identification 2-state signals studied peak positions @xmath19 values cumulants @xmath20 positions @xmath21 fisher zeroes closest real axis 1@xmath22 transitions fss behaviour @xmath23 surface corrections @xmath24 inhomogeneities boundary curvature @xmath25 leading term @xcite parameter @xmath26 depends considered cumulant 2@xmath27 transitions expect @xmath28 josephson s law @xmath29 gaussian systems @xmath30 discontinuous transition @xmath31 @xmath19 expects surface corrections @xmath24 studied in @xcite identify fss effects new topologyused lattices various size type @xmath32 updating with swendsen - wang cluster algorithm @xmath36 measured configurations autocorrelation time @xmath37 per lattice size results typical other systems @xmath38 expects leading fss behaviour @xmath39 pseudocritical points spherelike topologies compared to torus values close thermodynamic values small contribution @xmath39 scaling behaviour dominated by non - leading term @xmath40 from boundary curvature holds real part closest fisher zero peak value @xmath41 @xmath42 show scaling agreement with @xmath38 spherelike topology zeroes approach real axis complex coupling constant plane perpendicularly real part pseudocritical points close to thermodynamic value scaling behaviour dominated by @xmath40 term @xmath43-state potts model @xmath44 @xmath45 1@xmath22 order transition studied with multicanonical updating @xmath36 updates each lattice size lattices type @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 weak signal @xmath45 model histogram energy distribution clear double peak structure spherical lattices wash out weak 2-state signalsone interface compared to two for periodic boundary conditions difference technical advantage in interface tension study of compact @xmath2 gauge action in wilson formulation term coupling @xmath49 continued @xmath50 studies torus geometry find stable 2-state signals reconfirmed by recent results of @xcite monopole clusters for phase transition in 1985 study at positive @xmath49 tricritical point near @xmath51 2-state signals observed below value @xcite studies spherelike topology show no 2-state signals energy distribution at @xmath52 @xcite for studied lattices @xmath53 2 states at @xmath54 respond to criticism @xmath11-lattices continued work on almost smooth sphere @xmath55 project sites links plaquettes of @xmath56 or @xmath57 onto 4d spheres introduce weight factors similar to @xcite random triangulated lattices @xmath59 and @xmath60 denote areas of corresponding plaquette projected lattice technical details simulation discussed @xcite worked with lattices @xmath55 for @xmath61 ranging between 4 and 12 .couplings chosen critical values of @xmath62 for @xmath63 observed 2-state signals implement multi - canonical updating each lattice size accumulated @xmath64 updates ( 3-hit metropolis @xmath50 additional overrelaxation step to phase transition large autocorrelation lengths ( 300 - 2000 ) no indication of 2-state signals in multi - histogram distributions values cumulants at extrema compatible with continuous phase transition smaller fs corrections than torus geometry leading behaviour dominated by boundary curvature term suppressed by @xmath40 from leading scaling behaviour @xmath65 peak values of @xmath41 show power law behaviour range of values for @xmath66 @xmath67 from fits to data for all lattice sizes values depend on @xmath49 fss law for fit asymptotic regular contribution to value @xmath41 for lattice sizes closest fisher zeroes in complex @xmath62-plane behaviour reminiscent to ising results fig3 ] exhibits fss consistent with @xmath69 for all three values of @xmath49 @xmath68 gives cleanest most consistent resultvalue @xmath67 compatible gaussian 0.5 discontinuity value 0.25 compatible results mid-80s mcrg methods detailed analyses improved statistics presented elsewhere @xcite | 0.347807 | 2,184 | 1,156 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,688 | we propose a strategy to infer the transition redshift @xmath0 , which characterizes the passage through the universe decelerated to accelerated phases , in the framework @xmath1 gravities . to this end , we numerically reconstruct @xmath2 , i.e. the corresponding @xmath1 function re - expressed in terms of the redshift @xmath3 and we show how to match @xmath2 with cosmography . in particular , we relate @xmath2 and its derivatives to the cosmographic coefficients , i.e. @xmath4 and @xmath5 and demonstrate that its corresponding evolution may be framed by means of an effective logarithmic dark energy term @xmath6 , slightly departing from the case of a pure cosmological constant .
afterwards , we show that our model predicts viable transition redshift constraints , which agree with @xmath7cdm . to do so , we compute the corresponding @xmath0 in terms of cosmographic outcomes and find that @xmath8 . finally , we reproduce an effective @xmath2 and show that this class of models is fairly well compatible with present - time data . to do so ,
we get numerical constraints employing monte carlo fits with the union 2.1 supernova survey and with the hubble measurement data set . 2 | the @xmath7cdm model predicts the existence of a cosmological constant @xmath7 , entering the einstein equations and responsible for the dynamical properties of the universe today .
indeed , the model arguably represents the simplest cosmological paradigm to allow the universe to speed up at late times . despite its experimental successes ,
the @xmath7cdm model is unable to explain why the magnitudes of both matter and @xmath7 energy densities are so comparable today .
nevertheless , cosmological constraints indicate a severe difference between the observed @xmath7 and the corresponding quantum field theory s value .
it follows that the standard @xmath7cdm model could represent only a limiting case of more general paradigm , based on the existence of some sort of ( dynamical ) cosmic fluid , driving the universe today , dubbed dark energy @xcite .
dark energy seems to dominate over all cosmological species enabling the universe to accelerate .
dark energy acts as a _ dynamical source _ for speeding up the universe , whereas dark matter is responsible for structure formation .
recently , the need of understanding at which time the decelerating - accelerating transition phase occurs has leads cosmologists to directly measure the corresponding transition redshift @xmath0 @xcite
. there exists a wide consensus , based on robust observational supports , indicating @xmath0 around the unity @xcite . even though the @xmath7cdm value of @xmath0 reproduces the same result of recent observations
, we can not conclude that dark energy is a constant at all stages of universe s evolution .
however , several classes of models depart from the case of @xmath9 , indicating that @xmath0 represents a _
_ n__ew cosmic number which any cosmological model should reproduce to be in accordance with cosmic bounds . among concurring models to @xmath7cdm , modified gravity is considered a realistic alternative to dark energy . in particular , the challenge of finding out the most viable function @xmath1 , which permits to describe the gravity as a whole , passes through the reconstruction of the correct cosmological model . in other words
, determining viable numerical outcomes of @xmath0 means to reproduce the @xmath1 models which satisfy the late - time bounds in a model independent way @xcite . to support this idea
, one can consider _ cosmography _ , which represents a technique for matching cosmic data with observable quantities without imposing a particular cosmological model .
in general , a taylor expansions evaluated at present - time is adopted in cosmography . constraining a class of coefficients
gives rise to the _ cosmographic series _ @xcite .
hence , the use of cosmography may suggest possible departures from the standard @xmath7cdm model and also allows to understand how and whether dark energy evolves in time @xcite . in this paper , we show how to get the hubble rate by assuming the cosmographic constraints on @xmath1 models .
further , we bound numerical intervals for the transition redshift @xmath0 and demonstrate that only particular classes of @xmath1 models allow to get @xmath0 in the correct observable ranges .
afterwards , we propose an effective evolving dark energy term which extends the @xmath7cdm model and provides a logarithmic correction to the dark energy density .
this model predicts that the corresponding acceleration parameter changes sign around @xmath10 .
finally , we describe the corresponding @xmath11 function in terms of the cosmographic coefficients and propose a possible expression for it . the paper is structured as follows : in sec .
ii we describe the cosmographic approach in the context of @xmath1 gravity and compute the corresponding transition redshift .
we also show a comparison with current data and demonstrate that the dark energy corrections are compatible with observations .
we also report numerical outcomes .
finally , sec .
iii is devoted to conclusions and perspectives .
c c c c fit & supernovae & @xmath12 + [ 0.8ex ] @xmath13 value & @xmath14 & @xmath15 + & @xmath16@xmath17 & @xmath18@xmath19 + @xmath20 & @xmath21@xmath22 & @xmath23@xmath24 + @xmath25 & @xmath26@xmath27 & @xmath28@xmath29 + @xmath30 & @xmath31@xmath32 & @xmath33@xmath34 + @xmath35 & @xmath36@xmath37 & @xmath38@xmath39 + @xmath40 & @xmath41@xmath42 & @xmath43@xmath44 + @xmath45 & @xmath46@xmath47 & @xmath48@xmath49 + [ tab : dl2 ]
corrections to the hubble rate , inferred from @xmath1 gravity , can be achieved by means of cosmography .
the technique allows to determine the corresponding @xmath1-transition redshift @xmath0 showing its compatibility with present - time constraints .
in particular , cosmography represents a technique to fix limits on @xmath1 and its derivatives by passing through the use of an auxiliary function @xmath2 .
this means to define @xmath11 and its first derivative through @xmath50 . to this end
, one needs the scale factor expansion into a taylor series around the present epoch @xmath51 : @xmath52 keeping in mind eq .
( [ aexpans ] ) , we are able to evaluate @xmath2 and derivatives at @xmath53 which corresponds to @xmath54 . to relate @xmath2 and derivatives to the cosmographic expansion of @xmath55 , it is necessary to assume the constraint on @xmath56 @xcite @xmath57 with @xmath58 .
simple algebra leads to @xmath59 and @xmath60 . from eq .
( [ aexpans ] ) , we define the cosmographic coefficients as @xmath61 respectively the hubble rate @xmath62 , the acceleration parameter @xmath63 , the variation of acceleration , i.e. the jerk parameter @xmath64 . constraining the above quantities by means of cosmological data permits one to fix the initial settings on the curvature dark energy term and so on the form of @xmath1 .
moreover , once scalar curvature is somehow fixed by geometrical observations , cosmography becomes a pure model - independent treatment to fix cosmic bounds and to understand which corrections due to @xmath1 models are really viable to describe current universe expansion .
furthermore , it is easy to show that the measurements of the cosmographic parameters provide the disadvantage that all coefficients @xmath65 and @xmath64 can not be measured alone .
assuming , in fact , the luminosity distance as function of the cosmographic series , i.e. @xmath66 , and comparing cosmic data with it , we notice that it is impossible to _ decouple _ the terms @xmath67 and @xmath68 , respectively the second and third orders of the taylor expansion of @xmath69 @xcite .
thus , to better limit @xmath70 and @xmath5 independently , alleviating the corresponding degeneracy problem between coefficients , and also reducing the error bars , one can measure @xmath71 alone , by considering the first order of @xmath69 taylor expansion @xmath72 in the observational range @xmath73 . here , we adopt the union 2.1 supernova compilation @xcite and we compare our results with those predicted by the planck mission @xcite . once @xmath71 is fixed , it is possible to determine the corresponding @xmath74 and @xmath5 and it is also possible to obtain @xmath75 finally , we have @xmath76 these expressions are needful for setting priors on @xmath2 in terms of cosmography and to understand which deceleration - acceleration transition redshift @xmath0 is predicted in the context of @xmath1 gravity . with these considerations in mind , we can integrate the modified friedmann equations , directly by using cosmographic measurements as a sort of _ setting conditions_. in so doing , we infer a parameterized cosmological model , which differs from the @xmath7cdm model and shows an effective logarithmic dark energy term @xmath6 of the form @xcite : @xmath77 the whole hubble rate becomes @xmath78 , with @xmath35 and @xmath40 constants to be fixed by present - time bounds .
in fact , to get @xmath79 , terms @xmath35 and @xmath40 are @xmath80\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] which are consistent with cosmographic bounds .
the corresponding cosmographic @xmath2 function becomes @xmath81 with @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath84 , @xmath85 and @xmath86 and @xmath87 .
this @xmath2 predicts the above modified hubble rate and provides a deceleration - acceleration transition redshift of the form @xcite @xmath88 } { \left[\omega_m(1+z)^3 + \ln(\alpha+\beta z)\right]}\,.\ ] ] by means of eqs .
( [ lkdfj ] ) and ( [ quxz ] ) , the cosmographic reconstruction favors values of the hubble constant in agreement with other previous estimations @xcite and with the planck results on @xmath71 @xcite .
the bounds on @xmath89 and @xmath90 suggest that @xmath63 changes sign at @xmath91 , in agreement with previous measurements @xcite , showing meanwhile that our model provides @xmath92 to be compatible with the @xmath7cdm predictions . in addition , our cosmological model , providing an evolving dark energy , as presented in eq .
( [ kjdgh ] ) estimates viable @xmath30 and @xmath40 , with @xmath93 $ ] , providing slight departures from the standard @xmath7cdm model .
further , our model seems to pass experimental tests , performed using monte carlo analyses and the union 2.1 and hubble rate measurement data sets @xcite all our numerical outcomes have been listed in table i. future improvements will better distinguish any significant deviations from the @xmath7cdm case at higher redshift domains . with our results , in fact , it seems that dark energy slightly evolves also at small redshift , although a definitive conclusion remains object of future developments .
the passage between the deceleration to acceleration phases happens as the acceleration parameter @xmath63 vanishes , corresponding to a precise transition redshift @xmath0 . to understand how well @xmath1 gravities are able to reproduce suitable bounds on @xmath0
, we proposed to reconstruct the class of @xmath1 functions by means of cosmography .
cosmography represents a strategy to fix constraints on the principal observable quantities by means of taylor expansions around present - time .
cosmic data may be directly matched with the cosmographic coefficients and so the cosmographic series permits to understand which models are really favored than others . in the case of @xmath1 gravity , we defined the auxiliary function @xmath2 as @xmath11 and its first derivative as @xmath94 . thus , we showed how to relate them to the cosmographic parameters , i.e. @xmath4 and @xmath5 . in particular , reconstructing the modified dark energy term in terms of @xmath1 , by using as _ initial settings _ the numerical values inferred from cosmography , we found that dark energy seems to evolve as a curvature fluid proportional to a logarithm , at small redshift .
this fact departures from the cosmological standard model , in which dark energy is a constant at all stages of universe s evolution .
however , albeit our model showed an evolving dark energy term , its transition redshift @xmath0 is compatible with present - time observations .
we also found the corresponding @xmath95 . to find out @xmath2 ,
the degeneracy between cosmographic coefficients are alleviated , fixing @xmath71 , by fitting the first order taylor expansion of the luminosity distance in the range @xmath96 .
all numerical results are in agreement with present - time observations and it seems possible that dark energy may be framed in terms of a curvature dark energy fluid . to show that paradigm is capable of well reproducing cosmic bounds , we employed experimental tests , making use of the most recent union 2.1 supernova survey and of the hubble measurement data set .
future developments will assume different redshift domains to better fix the cosmographic coefficients .
thus , the corresponding effective dark energy term would change correspondingly , providing a different transition redshift
. this technique will be useful to understand whether @xmath1 functions are compatible with cosmological data at different epochs .
moreover , another significative aspect will be to directly relate the cosmographic coefficients to the transition redshift itself , opening the possibility to use @xmath0 as a _
cosmographic coefficient . | @xmath7cdm model predicts cosmological constant @xmath7 responsible for dynamical properties universe model represents simplest cosmological paradigm universe speed up late times experimental successes model explain why matter and @xmath7 energy densities comparable cosmological constraints indicate difference between observed @xmath7 and quantum field theory s value standard @xmath7cdm model represent limiting case of general paradigm dynamical cosmic fluid driving universe dark energy @xcite dark energy cosmological species enabling universe accelerate dark energy acts dynamical source for speeding up universe dark matter for structure formation need understanding decelerating - accelerating transition phase leads cosmologists to measure transition redshift @xmath0 @xcite consensus indicating @xmath0 around unity @xcite @xmath7cdm value of @xmath0 reproduces observations can not conclude dark energy constant at all stages universe s evolution models depart from case @xmath9 @xmath0 represents cosmic number should models modified gravity realistic alternative to dark energychallenge viable function @xmath1 gravity passes through reconstruction correct cosmological model determining viable numerical outcomes of @xmath0 @xmath1 models late - time bounds cosmography technique matching cosmic data with observable quantities without cosmological model taylor expansions evaluated at present - time adopted in cosmography constraining coefficients cosmographic series _ @xcite cosmography departures from standard @xmath7cdm model dark energy evolves in time show hubble rate assuming cosmographic constraints on @xmath1 models bound numerical intervals for transition redshift @xmath0 particular classes of @xmath1 models allow @xmath0 correct observable ranges propose evolving dark energy term extends @xmath7cdm model provides logarithmic correction to dark energy density model predicts acceleration parameter changes around @xmath10 describe @xmath11 function cosmographic coefficients propose possible expression paper structured sec . ii describe cosmographic approach context @xmath1 gravity compute transition redshift comparison with current data dark energy corrections compatible with observations report numerical outcomes sec . iii to conclusions perspectivesc fit supernovae @xmath12 0.8ex @xmath13 value @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath20 @xmath21@xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26@xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath33@xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36@xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41@xmath42@xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46@xmath47 @xmath48@xmath49 tab dl2 corrections hubble rate @xmath1 gravity achieved cosmography technique determine @xmath1-transition redshift @xmath0 compatibility present - time constraints cosmography fix limits @xmath1 derivatives auxiliary function @xmath2 define @xmath11 first derivative @xmath50 needs scale factor expansion taylor series present epoch @xmath51 @xmath52 evaluate @xmath2 derivatives @xmath53 corresponds @xmath54 relate @xmath2 derivatives cosmographic expansion @xmath55 assume constraint @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 algebra leads @xmath59 @xmath60 eqdefine cosmographic coefficients as @xmath61 hubble rate acceleration parameter variation of acceleration jerk parameter @xmath64 constraining quantities cosmological data initial settings on curvature dark energy term form of @xmath1 scalar curvature fixed by observations cosmography model - independent fix cosmic bounds understand corrections to @xmath1 models universe expansion measurements cosmographic parameters disadvantage coefficients @xmath65 @xmath64 measured alone luminosity distance function of cosmographic series @xmath66 comparing data impossible to decouple terms @xmath67 @xmath68 second third orders of taylor expansion of @xmath69 limit @xmath70 @xmath5 independently degeneracy problem error bars measure @xmath71 alone considering first order of @xmath69 taylor expansion @xmath72 in observational range @xmath73 adopt union 2.1 supernova compilation @xcite compare results with planck mission @xcite@xmath71 fixed determine @xmath74 @xmath5 obtain @xmath75 @xmath76 expressions needful setting priors @xmath2 cosmography understand deceleration - acceleration transition redshift @xmath0 @xmath1 gravity integrate modified friedmann equations cosmographic measurements setting conditions infer parameterized cosmological model differs from @xmath7cdm model shows effective logarithmic dark energy term @xmath6 @xcite @xmath77 hubble rate becomes @xmath78 @xmath35 @xmath40 constants fixed by present - time bounds @xmath79 @xmath35 @xmath40 @xmath80 consistent with cosmographic bounds cosmographic @xmath2 function becomes @xmath81 with @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath2 predicts modified hubble rate provides deceleration - acceleration transition redshift form @xcite @xmath88 cosmographic reconstruction favors values hubble constant agreement previous estimations planck results on @xmath71bounds on @xmath89 @xmath90 suggest @xmath63 changes at @xmath91 agreement with previous measurements model provides @xmath92 compatible with @xmath7cdm predictions cosmological model evolving dark energy estimates @xmath30 @xmath40 with @xmath93 slight departures from standard @xmath7cdm model model experimental tests monte carlo analyses union 2.1 hubble rate measurement data sets numerical outcomes listed in table i future improvements distinguish deviations from @xmath7cdm at higher redshift domains dark energy evolves at small redshift definitive conclusion future developments passage between deceleration to acceleration phases as acceleration parameter @xmath63 vanishes precise transition redshift @xmath0 understand @xmath1 gravities bounds on @xmath0 proposed reconstruct class @xmath1 functions cosmography fix constraints on observable quantities taylor expansions cosmic data matched with cosmographic coefficients series models favored defined auxiliary function @xmath2 as @xmath11 first derivative as @xmath94 to cosmographic parameters @xmath4 @xmath5reconstructing dark energy term @xmath1 numerical values cosmography found dark energy as curvature fluid proportional to logarithm small redshift departures from cosmological standard model dark energy constant at universe evolution model evolving dark energy transition redshift @xmath0 compatible with present - time observations found corresponding @xmath95 @xmath2 degeneracy between cosmographic coefficients alleviated fixing @xmath71 fitting first taylor expansion luminosity distance @xmath96 numerical results agreement with present - time observations dark energy framed curvature dark energy fluid cosmic bounds employed experimental tests union 2.1 supernova survey hubble measurement data set future developments assume different redshift domains fix cosmographic coefficients dark energy term change different transition redshift technique useful understand @xmath1 functions with cosmological data different epochs cosmographic coefficients to transition redshift possibility use @xmath0 as cosmographic coefficient | 0.433036 | 2,790 | 1,466 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,697 | in this paper , we investigate the entanglement degrees of pseudoscalar meson states via quantum algebra @xmath0 . by making use of transition effect of generators @xmath1 of @xmath0
, we construct various transition operators in terms of @xmath1 of , and act them on @xmath2-@xmath3-@xmath4 mixing meson state .
the entanglement degrees of both the initial state and final state are calculated with the help of entropy theory .
the diagrams of entanglement degrees are presented .
our result shows that a state with desired entanglement degree can be achieved by acting proper chosen transition operator on an initial state .
this sheds new light on the connect among quantum information , particle physics and yangian algebra .
+ + keywords : yangian @xmath0 ; @xmath2-@xmath3-@xmath4 mixing ; the entanglement degree | it has been realized that quantum entanglement is a key ingredient in quantum computation , quantum communication , and quantum cryptography@xcite .
many two - level quantum systems , or qubits , have been widely used in quantum information@xcite .
recently , the bipartite qutrit systems have drawn people s attention and exhibited varieties of advantages .
it enables powerful computation@xcite , establishes secure communication@xcite and cryptography@xcite , and reduces the communication complexity@xcite .
additionally , the high energy quantum teleportation using neutral kaons has been investigated@xcite .
these hint the possibility of connecting quantum information and particle physics , this connection may reveal novel and interesting feature .
considering these two aspects , we take the mixed light pseudoscalar meson states , a type of bipartite qutrit system , into account . in particle physics ,
the study on mixed meson states@xcite plays an important role and many works are devoted to this field@xcite , especially the study on @xmath5 mixed state , since it provides a unique opportunity for testing qcd @xcite which is widely used in describing strong interaction . in the last decades , people have studied the mixing angle@xcite , the hadronic @xmath2-@xmath4 decay@xcite , @xmath2-@xmath4 mixing in radiative @xmath6-meson decay@xcite , and so on .
however , much work of particle physics has been done for testing the theory and experiment while hardly concerned with quantum information and the related algebra configuration , such as yangians . as is known ,
the light pseudoscalar meson states in quark - flavor basis have @xmath7 symmetry@xcite .
it is important to expand the research on the symmetry of pseudoscalar meson states to yangian @xmath0 .
yangian , as an algebra beyond the lie algebra , is a powerful mathematical method for investigating the new symmetry of quantum systems which are nonlinear and integrable . demonstrating and investigating whether simple physical systems possess yangian is important and helpful for exploring physical systems via quantum algebra .
people have found the yangian symmetry in many physical models , such as calogero - sutherland model@xcite , the hubbard model@xcite and the heisenberg model@xcite , etc .
the realizations of @xmath8@xcite as the simplest one in yangian algebra have been gained much attention .
however , the yangian related to the lie algebra @xmath7 , @xmath0 , which is closed to the light pseudoscalar meson states in particle physics , need to be investigated in more detail .
thus , much attention is going to be payed in this paper to the application of @xmath0 algebra in the meson systems here .
in the low mass hadron region , the violations of isospin symmetry for pseudoscalar meson states within qcd are generated by the admixtures of @xmath2-@xmath3-@xmath4 . @xmath2 and @xmath4 are linear combination of @xmath7 singlet @xmath9 and octet @xmath10 , @xmath3 is another @xmath7 octet . because of the important application and significance of @xmath2-@xmath3-@xmath4 mixing , we choose their superposition states as the initial state @xmath11 where @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 are the normalized real amplitudes and they satisfy @xmath15 .
@xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 .
the entanglement degree of the genuine n - particle qutrit pure state@xcite is measured by its mean entropy @xmath19 where @xmath20 is the reduced partial von neumann entropy for the @xmath21th particle only , with the other @xmath22 particles traced out , and @xmath23 is the corresponding reduced density matrix . since the system in eq .
( [ eq1 ] ) is bipartite qutrit , i.e. @xmath24 , the corresponding entanglement degree of this initial state can be calculated via eq.([2 ] ) , thus we have @xmath25 the behavior of @xmath26 depending on @xmath12 and @xmath13 ( due to the normalization condition , @xmath14 is not an independent parameter . )
is given in fig .
[ fig1 ] . for different @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
] before constructing transition operators , let us first give a brief introduction of yangian @xmath0 .
@xmath0 algebra@xcite is generated by the generators @xmath27 which are usually defined as follows @xmath28 here @xmath29 form a @xmath7 algebra characterized by @xmath30 , @xmath31 form a local @xmath7 on the @xmath21 site , and are equal to half of the corresponding gell - mann matrices , @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 are parameters or casimir operators and @xmath35 which satisfies @xmath36 a more practical expression is expressed as @xmath37 here @xmath38 are the generators of @xmath0 .
due to the transition effect of yangian generators , transition operators @xmath39 can be constructed as compositions of the generators in eq .
( [ a ] ) .
@xmath39 can be looked upon as a function of @xmath40 and @xmath41 , namely , @xmath42 $ ] . when acting the transition operator on @xmath43 in eq .
( [ eq1 ] ) , a final state @xmath44 can be gotten and its entanglement degree @xmath45 can also be calculated out via eq.([2 ] ) . different final states with desired entanglement degrees thus can be gotten by acting corresponding transition operators on initial states . in order to illustrate this issue clearly , several simple examples are going to be discussed in more detail .
as we discussed before , the entanglement degree of final state can be tuned by changing the parameters of the transition operator . as an example , let us act the transition operator of @xmath46 on the initial state in eq.([eq1 ] ) , the corresponding final state is @xmath47.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the normalizing condition leads to @xmath48 and @xmath49=1 $ ] . as discussed in the preceding section , the entanglement degree of the final state @xmath50 can be calculated by the use of eq.([2 ] ) as @xmath51 as we can see , by changing the value of @xmath33 and @xmath34 , the entanglement degree @xmath52 can be tuned .
this behavior is shown in fig .
[ fig3 ] for the case of @xmath53
. varies with @xmath33 and @xmath34 when @xmath53 . ]
another more simpler case is @xmath54 for which the final state reads latexmath:[\[\begin{aligned } with normalization condition @xmath48 and @xmath56=3 $ ] .
similarly , @xmath57 which also depends on @xmath33 and @xmath34 , as shown in fig . [ fig5 ]
. varies with @xmath33 and @xmath34 when @xmath53 . ]
these two examples clearly shows that by tuning the parameters @xmath33 and @xmath34 of transition operators , the entanglement degree of final state varies between 0 and 1
. however , there are exceptional cases in which the entanglement degree of final state is found to be the same as the initial state or be zero , independent with @xmath33 and @xmath34 , as is shown in the next section .
although generally , transition operators with different @xmath33 and @xmath34 provide final states with different entanglement degrees , there do exist special cases in which the final state possesses the same entanglement degree with the initial state or the final state are totally disentangled .
both cases are very important in quantum information and quantum computation . for the transition operator @xmath58 , the final state is @xmath59 with normalizing condition @xmath60 and @xmath48 .
it is very easy to verify that the entanglement degree of the final state @xmath50 is equal to the one of the initial state , namely , @xmath61 .
same thing happens on transition operator @xmath62 , corresponding to whom the final state reads @xmath63 with normalizing condition being @xmath60 and @xmath48 .
again , calculation shows that @xmath61 . without any difficulty
, it can be verified that transition operators @xmath64 , @xmath65 , and @xmath66 lead to total disentangled final states , independent of the choice of @xmath12 and @xmath13 in the initial state .
in conclusion , we have investigated the entanglement degrees of pseudoscalar meson states via quantum algebra @xmath0 . by making use of transition effect of generators @xmath1 of @xmath0
, we have constructed various transition operators in terms of @xmath1 , and have acted them on @xmath2-@xmath3-@xmath4 mixing meson state .
the entanglement degrees of both the initial state and final state have been calculated with the help of entropy theory .
our result shows that a state with desired entanglement degree can be achieved by acting proper chosen transition operator on an initial state .
this is very helpful to control the degree of entanglement in quantum communication .
entanglement has been considered as an essential resource in most applications of quantum information@xcite . although the quantum channels used in quantum teleportation are usually represented by a maximally entangled pair@xcite
, partially entangled quantum channel becomes a hot topic@xcite nowadays due to the noise factors in the realistic world .
moreover , in quantum computing , a new important development is the probabilistic implementation of a nonlocal gate by using a single non - maximally entangled state@xcite .
the success fidelity maintains a high level though the state shared is partially entangled .
99 a. galindo and m. a. m. delgado , _ rev .
* 74 * ( 2002 ) 347 .
f. g. deng , g. l. long and x. s. liu , _ phys .
rev . a _ * 68 * ( 2003 ) 042317 . h. lu and g. c. guo , _ phys .
a _ * 276 * ( 2000 ) 209 . a. m. childs and i. l. chuang , _ phys .
a _ * 63 * ( 2000 ) 012306 .
n. k. langford , r. b. dalton , m. d. harvey , j. l. brien , g. j. pryde , a. gilchrist , s. d. bartlett and a. g. white , _ phys .
* 93 * ( 2004 ) 053601 .
h. b. pasquinucci and a. peres , _ phys .
* 85 * ( 2000 ) 3313 .
brukner , m. ukowski and a. zeilinger , _ phys .
_ * 89 * ( 2002 ) 197901 .
y. shi , _ phys .
b _ * 641 * ( 2006 ) 75 . m.gell-mann and a. pais , phys .
97 ( 1955 ) 1387 .
t. feldmann and p. kroll , phys .
d 58 ( 1998 ) 114006 a. magiera and h. machner , nucl . phys . a 674 ( 2000 )
515 p. kroll , _ modern phys .
a _ * 20 * ( 2005 ) 2667 .
v. dmitrasinovic , _ phys .
rev.d _ * 56 * ( 1997 ) 247 .
j. cao , f. g. cao , t. huang and b. q. ma , _ phys .
* 58 * ( 1998 ) 113006 .
b. borasoy and r. nilbler , _ phys .
j. a _ * 26 * ( 2005 ) 383 . f. d. fazio and m. r. pennington , _ j. high energy phys . _ * 7 * ( 2000 ) 51
. m. y. han and y. nambu , _ phys .
* 139 * ( 1965 ) b1006 .
d. uglov , _ commun .
* 191 * ( 1998 ) 663 .
a. kundu , _ phys .
a _ * 249 * ( 1998 ) 126 .
d. bernard , _ inter .
j. modern phys .
b _ * 7 * ( 1993 ) 3517 . f. d. m. haldane , _ phys . rev .
* 60 * ( 1988 ) 635 .
b. s. shastry , _ phys .
lett . _ * 60 * ( 1988 ) 639 .
f. pan , d. liu , g. y. lu and j. p. draayer , _ phys .
a _ * 336 * ( 2005 ) 384 . m. l. ge . and
yang@xmath67baxter equation _ ( shanghai : shanghai scientific and technical publishers ) ( 1999 ) p511 . c. h. bennett , g. brassard , c. crpeau , r. jozsa , a. peres and w. k. wootters , _ phys .
* 70 * ( 1993 ) 1895 .
j. x. fang , y. s. lin , s. q. zhu and x. f. chen , _ phys .
a _ * 67 * ( 2004 ) 014305 .
l. chen and y. x. chen , _ phys .
a _ * 71 * ( 2005 ) 054302 . | quantum entanglement key in quantum computation communication cryptography two - level quantum systems qubits used in quantum information bipartite qutrit systems drawn attention exhibited advantages enables powerful computation secure communication cryptography reduces communication complexity high energy quantum teleportation using neutral kaons investigated hint possibility connecting quantum information particle physics connection may reveal novel feature mixed light pseudoscalar meson states bipartite qutrit system account study on mixed meson states important works devoted especially @xmath5 mixed state provides unique opportunity for testing qcd strong interaction decades studied mixing angle hadronic @xmath2-@xmath4 decay mixing in radiative @xmath6-meson decay much work particle physics testing theory experiment quantum information algebra configuration light pseudoscalar meson states in quark - flavor basis have @xmath7 symmetry@xcite important to expand research on symmetry of pseudoscalar meson states to yangian @xmath0yangian beyond lie algebra powerful method investigating symmetry quantum systems nonlinear integrable physical systems possess yangian important found yangian symmetry in physical models calogero - sutherland hubbard heisenberg realizations of @xmath8@xcite simplest in yangian algebra gained attention yangian related to lie algebra @xmath7 @xmath0 closed to light pseudoscalar meson states particle physics attention application @xmath0 algebra in meson systems low mass hadron region violations of isospin symmetry for pseudoscalar meson states qcd generated by admixtures @xmath2-@xmath3-@xmath4 linear combination of @xmath7 singlet @xmath9 octet @xmath10 @xmath3 @xmath7 octet mixing choose superposition states as initial state @xmath11 @xmath12 normalized real amplitudes satisfy @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 entanglement degree n - particle qutrit state@xcite measured by mean entropy @xmath19 @xmath20 reduced partial von neumann entropy @xmath21th particle other @xmath22 particles traced out @xmath23 reduced density matrix system in eq bipartite qutrit @xmath24 entanglement degree calculated via eq.([2 ] ) @xmath25 behavior @xmath26 on @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 not independent parameter given in fig . @xmath12 @xmath13 constructing transition operators introduction yangian @xmath0 algebra@xcite generated by generators @xmath27 defined @xmath28 @xmath29 form @xmath7 algebra @xmath30 @xmath31 form local @xmath7 @xmath21 site equal to half gell - mann matrices @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 parameters operators @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 generators of @xmath0 transition operators @xmath39 as compositions of generators @xmath39 function of @xmath40 @xmath41 acting transition operator on @xmath43eq1 final state @xmath44 entanglement degree @xmath45 calculated via eq.([2 ] ) final states desired entanglement degrees by acting transition operators on initial states examples discussed entanglement degree final state tuned by changing parameters transition operator act transition operator @xmath46 on initial state eq.( corresponding final state @xmath47. normalizing condition leads to @xmath48 and @xmath49=1 $ entanglement degree final state @xmath50 calculated eq.([2 ] ) changing value @xmath33 @xmath34 entanglement degree @xmath52 tuned behavior shown in fig . @xmath53 varies with @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath53 case @xmath54 final state reads latexmath\begin{aligned } normalization condition @xmath48 and @xmath56=3 $ @xmath57 depends on @xmath33 @xmath34 varies with @xmath33 @xmath34 when @xmath53 tuning parameters @xmath33 @xmath34 of transition operators entanglement degree final state varies between 0 and 1 exceptional cases entanglement final state same as initial or zero independent with @xmath33 @xmath34 transition operators @xmath33 @xmath34 provide final states different entanglement degrees special cases final state same entanglement initial or disentangled important in quantum information computation transition operator @xmath58 final state @xmath59 normalizing @xmath60 @xmath48 easy to verify entanglement final state @xmath50 equal to initial state @xmath61 same transition operator @xmath62 final state @xmath63 normalizing condition @xmath60 and @xmath48 calculation shows @xmath61 transition operators @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 lead to disentangled final states independent @xmath12 @xmath13 initial investigated entanglement degrees of pseudoscalar meson states via quantum algebra @xmath0 transition effect constructed transition operators @xmath1 acted on @xmath2-@xmath3-@xmath4 mixing meson state entanglement degrees initial final state calculated with entropy theory state desired entanglement degree achieved by acting proper transition operator on initial state helpful to control degree entanglement in quantum communicationentanglement essential quantum information channels teleportation represented maximally entangled pair partially entangled channel hot topic noise quantum computing new development probabilistic implementation nonlocal gate single non - maximally entangled state success fidelity high state partially entangled a. galindo delgado rev 74 2002 ) 347 f g. deng g. l. long x. s. liu 68 * 2003 ) 042317 h. lu g. c. guo phys 276 * 2000 ) 209 a. m. childs l. chuang 63 * 2000 ) 012306 n. langford. dalton. harvey j. l. brien pryde. gilchrist. bartlett g. white 93 2004 ) 053601. pasquinucci a. peres 85 2000 ) 3313 brukner m. ukowski a. zeilinger 89 2002 ) 197901 shi phys 641 ( 2006 ) 75 m.gell-mann a. pais phys 97 ( 1955 ) 1387 t. feldmann p. kroll phys 58 ( 1998 ) 114006 a. magiera h. machnerphys 674 2000 ) 515 kroll modern phys 20 2005 ) 2667 dmitrasinovic phys 56 1997 ) 247 j. cao g. cao t. huang q ma 58 1998 ) 113006 b. borasoy r. nilbler 26 2005 ) 383 fazio r. pennington high energy . 7 2000 ) 51 y. han y nambu phys 139 1965 ) b1006 d uglov 191 1998 ) 663 kundu phys 249 1998 ) 126 d. bernard modern phys . 7 1993 ) 3517 haldane phys 60 1988 ) 635 s. shastry phys 60 1988 ) 639 f. pan d. liu g y. lu p. draayer phys 336 2005 ) 384 l. ge yang@xmath67baxter equation shanghai scientific technical publishers 1999 ) p511 h. bennett. brassard. crpeau r. jozsa. peres k. wootters 70 1993 ) 1895 . fang s. lin q. zhu x f. chen phys67 * 2004 ) 014305 chen x. chen phys 71 2005 ) 054302 | 0.49475 | 3,101 | 1,673 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,698 | star clusters are subject to density irregularities in their host galaxy , such as giant molecular clouds ( gmcs ) , the galactic disc and spiral arms , which are largely ignored in present day ( @xmath0-body ) simulations of cluster evolution .
time dependent external potentials give rise to tidal forces that accelerate stars leading to an expansion and more rapid dissolution of the cluster .
i explain the basic principles of this tidal heating in the _ impulse approximation _ and show how related disruption time - scales depend on properties of the cluster . | assume a cluster and a moving perturbing object ( gmc , spiral arm , disc , etc . ) with relative separation and velocity @xmath1 and @xmath2 , respectively .
the acceleration due to the perturber is referred to as @xmath3 .
the _ tidal _ acceleration ( @xmath4 ) on a star at a distance @xmath5 from the cluster centre can be obtained by linearising @xmath3 : @xmath6 the total velocity increase ( @xmath7 ) of the star after the perturbation can be obtained by substituting @xmath8 and integrating eq .
if the time it takes the perturber to pass the cluster is much shorter than the crossing time of stars in the cluster , @xmath5 can be assumed constant .
this is referred to as the _ impulsive approximation_. the resulting then simply scales with @xmath5 , @xmath2 and the maximum acceleration ( @xmath9 ) as : @xmath10 .
the total kinetic energy gain per unit of cluster mass ( @xmath11 ) can then be written as @xmath12 where we used that the mean - square position of stars ( ) is @xmath13 . _ eq .
[ eq:2 ] shows that @xmath11 is large for slow perturbations on large clusters_. for passing point masses @xmath14 , with @xmath15 the gravitational constant , @xmath16 the mass of the perturber and @xmath17 the distance of closest approach ( see @xcite for the exact definition of eq .
[ eq:2 ] , taking into account an extended density profile for a gmc ) . for a one - dimensional density perturbation , such as the perpendicular crossing of a galactic disc and , to lesser extend , the crossing of a spiral arm , @xmath18 , with @xmath19 the scale height / length and @xmath20 the central density . for more details
see @xcite and references therein .
a single tidal perturbation can accelerate stars to velocities much higher than the escape velocity .
this _ overkill _ energy can not be used to unbind more stars and is lost with the escaping stars . for this reason , the fractional mass loss ( , with @xmath21 the cluster mass ) is lower than the fractional energy gain ( , with @xmath11 from eq .
[ eq:2 ] and @xmath22 the cluster energy per unit mass ) , by a factor @xmath23 , with @xmath24 @xcite . with this and the definition of ( @xmath25 , with the cluster half - mass radius and @xmath26 , depending on the cluster density profile ) , we can write @xmath27 as @xmath28 where we used eq . [ eq:2 ] and @xmath29 , with @xmath30 , depending on the cluster density profile .
the statistical mean mass loss per unit time ( @xmath31 ) is defined as @xmath32 , where @xmath33 for gmc encounters is the time between successive encounters and depends on the gmc density ( @xmath34 ) as @xmath35 .
_ note that @xmath36 and @xmath31 due to external perturbations are independent of cluster mass .
defining the cluster disruption time ( @xmath37 ) as @xmath38 , we can write ( for gmc encounters ) from observations of clusters in different galaxies , @xcite found that @xmath40 , with @xmath41 .
the same value for @xmath42 was found in @xmath0-body simulations of clusters dissolving in a galactic tidal field @xcite , however , their values are much longer than the observed ones .
recently found that @xmath43 , which implies @xmath44 and hence @xmath45 ( eq . [ eq:4 ] ) .
the fact that due to the galactic tidal field _ and
_ due to the tidal perturbations depend on in almost the same way can explain why the values of @xmath42 derived from observations of clusters in different galaxies are so similar @xcite , while varies by almost two orders of magnitude . , h. & makino , j. 2003 , , 340 , 227 , s. g. & lamers , h. j. g. l. m. 2003 , , 338 , 717 , m. , athanassoula , e. , & portegies zwart , s. f. 2006 , mnras , submitted , m. , portegies zwart , s. f. , baumgardt , h. , et al .
2006 , , 371 , 793 , h. j. g. l. m. , gieles , m. , bastian , n. , et al .
2005 , , 441 , 117 , h. j. g. l. m. , gieles , m. , & portegies zwart , s. f. 2005 , , 429 , 173 , s. s. 2004 , , 416 , 537 , l. 1987 , dynamical evolution of globular clusters ( princeton , nj , princeton university press , 1987 ) | cluster moving perturbing object relative separation velocity @xmath1 @xmath2 acceleration due to perturber @xmath3 tidal acceleration @xmath4 on star distance @xmath5 from cluster centre linearising @xmath3 : @xmath6 total velocity increase @xmath7 star after perturbation substituting @xmath8 integrating eq perturber pass cluster shorter than crossing time stars @xmath5 assumed constant impulsive approximation resulting scales with @xmath5 @xmath2 maximum acceleration @xmath9 as @xmath10 total kinetic energy gain per unit cluster mass @xmath11 written as @xmath12 mean - position of stars @xmath13 @xmath11 large for slow perturbations large clusters passing point masses @xmath14 @xmath15 gravitational constant @xmath16 mass perturber @xmath17 distance of closest approach see @xcite definition eq extended density profile one - dimensional density perturbation perpendicular crossing of galactic disc spiral arm @xmath18 @xmath19 scale height / length @xmath20 central density details see @xcite referencestidal perturbation stars to higher than escape velocity overkill energy unbind stars lost with escaping stars fractional mass loss @xmath21 cluster mass lower than fractional energy gain @xmath11 @xmath22 cluster energy per unit mass by factor @xmath23 @xmath24 @xcite definition of @xmath25 @xmath26 density write @xmath27 as @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 density statistical mean mass loss per unit time @xmath31 defined as @xmath32 @xmath33 time between successive encounters on density @xmath34 as @xmath35 @xmath36 and @xmath31 to perturbations independent of cluster mass cluster disruption time @xmath37 as @xmath38 for gmc encounters from observations of clusters in galaxies found @xmath40 @xmath41 same value for @xmath42 in @xmath0-body simulations of clusters dissolving in galactic tidal field values longer than observed ones @xmath43 implies @xmath44 and @xmath45galactic tidal field tidal perturbations values @xmath42 clusters galaxies similar @xcite varies two orders magnitude makino 2003 340 , 227 lamers h j 2003 338 , 717 athanassoula e. portegies zwart s. f. 2006 mnras portegies zwart baumgardt h. . 2006 371 , 793 h. j. g. l. gieles m. bastian n. 2005 441 , 117 gieles portegies zwart s. f. 2005 429 , 173 2004 416 , 537 1987 dynamical evolution globular clusters princeton nj university press 1987 | 0.183754 | 1,151 | 620 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,716 | lematre - tolman - bondi inhomogeneous spacetimes can be used as a cosmological model to account for the type ia supernova data . however , such models also give rise to large velocities of galaxy clusters with respect to the cosmic microwave background .
these velocities can be measured using the kinematic sunyaev - zeldovich effect .
this paper presents a calculation of galaxy cluster velocities as a function of redshift for such a model . | observations of type ia supernovae@xcite , along with the usual assumption that the universe is homogeneous , indicate that the expansion of the universe is accelerating . this acceleration necessitates the presence of an exotic form of matter called dark energy , which can most easily be accounted for by a cosmological constant .
however , because the scale of the cosmological constant is so small ( @xmath0 in planck units ) it is natural to look for alternative explanations for the data .
one such alternative explanation is to account for the supernova data using a comsmological model that is inhomogeneous.@xcite the simplest such models are the lematre - tolman - bondi(ltb ) spacetimes.@xcite these are spherically symmetric spacetimes with pressureless fluid ( dust ) as the matter .
models of this form can be constructed that account for the supernova data as well as the standard homogeneous `` concordance '' cosmology does.@xcite thus to test the difference between concordance cosmology and inhomogeneous cosmology , a different test is needed .
such a test is provided by the kinematic sunyaev - zeldovich ( ksz ) effect.@xcite this effect comes about when cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) photons scatter off the gas in a galaxy cluster .
the spectrum of the scattered photons depends on the velocity of the galaxy cluster with respect to the microwave background , and thus an analysis of the cmb can be used to find this velocity .
thus , each ltb model must be compared not only to the supernova data but also to the ksz data , and only those models that match both sets of data can be considered viable .
analyses of the ksz effect for particular ltb models have been performed@xcite as well as a general analysis for slightly inhomogeneous models.@xcite unfortunately , each ltb model is different , and so each must be seperately subjected to the ksz test ( as well as the supernova test ) to see if that model is viable . in this paper we will present a general method for finding the velocity of galaxy clusters in ltb models
. we will then apply this method to the models treated in@xcite .
section 2 presents the general method of calculating these velocities .
section 3 applies this method to the models of@xcite .
conclusions are presented in section 4 .
the metric in the ltb spacetimes takes the form @xmath1 here the area radius @xmath2 is not one of the coordinates but is instead a function of the coordinates @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
the function @xmath5 is a function of @xmath4 .
an overdot denotes derivative with respect to @xmath3 while a prime denotes derivative with respect to @xmath4 .
the ltb spacetime has a prefered timelike vector @xmath6 which is the four - velocity of the dust that makes up the matter in the spacetime .
however , an ltb spacetime with a cosmic microwave background has another prefered vector , which we will call @xmath7 , the four - velocity of the cmb .
since the spacetime is spherically symmetric , there is also a preferred unit spacelike vector @xmath8 such that @xmath9 is an outgoing null vector and @xmath10 is an ingoing null vector .
expressed in terms of @xmath7 and @xmath8 , the ltb four - velocity @xmath11 takes the form @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the velocity of the ltb observer with respect to the cmb and where @xmath14 .
now let @xmath15 and @xmath16 be respectively ingoing and outgoing cmb photons each with the same frequency @xmath17 as measured in the cmb rest frame .
then it follows that these vectors take the form @xmath18 now define the quantity @xmath19 by @xmath20 then it follows that @xmath21 we restrict attention to times when the cmb has decoupled from the matter , so that @xmath22 are null geodesics . thus , to find the velocity of the galaxies with respect to the cmb
, we need to find the behavior of null geodesics in ltb spacetimes . to find the behavior of null geodesics ,
we first recall some facts about the ltb spacetimes . from the einstein field equation
, it follows that @xmath23 where the function @xmath24 depends only on @xmath4 .
the density is given by @xmath25 it is helpful to introduce the quantities @xmath26 and @xmath27 by @xmath28 then equation ( [ rdot ] ) becomes @xmath29 whose solution is @xmath30 here @xmath31 is a function of @xmath4 whose meaning is the time at which the shell of dust with coordinate @xmath4 shrinks to zero radius . to have a genuine big bang singularity , we chose @xmath32 .
we use the coordinate freedom to change @xmath4 to any function of @xmath4 to set @xmath27 to the constant @xmath33 . with this choice , the particular ltb model
is then determined by the choice of the function @xmath34 .
in particular , when @xmath35 the ltb solution becomes the standard dust frw cosmology with @xmath36 . for any future directed null geodesic @xmath37 define the quantity @xmath38 .
then it follows that @xmath39 where @xmath40 where @xmath41 and the sign of @xmath42 depends on whether @xmath37 is outgoing or ingoing .
note from the definition of @xmath43 that @xmath44 where @xmath45 is the @xmath43 corresponding to @xmath16 and correspondingly for @xmath46 .
it follows from the form of the ltb metric that @xmath47 then using the geodesic equation we find @xmath48 from which it follows that @xmath49 + \epsilon { \sqrt { 1+f } } { a ' } ) \label{main}\ ] ] we will use equation ( [ main ] ) to find the velocity @xmath13 of the dust relative to the cmb as follows : note that since we have chosen @xmath32 it follows that at early times the spacetimes becomes frw .
note also that in frw spacetimes @xmath50 and therefore @xmath43 is constant . for cmb photons with the average energy this constant , which we will call @xmath51 is the same for outgoing and ingoing photons .
integrating equation ( [ main ] ) back from the point at which we want to calculate @xmath13 to the big bang yields @xmath52 and since we do this for both outgoing and ingoing geodesics , we obtain both @xmath53 and @xmath54 which in turn allows us to calculate @xmath55 and thus the velocity @xmath13
. we will numerically integrate equation ( [ main ] ) .
however , in order to do that we will need to be able to evaluate all the quantities on the right hand side of that equation at all points in the integration . as we will show , all that is needed is to know @xmath2 and @xmath56 and the rest of the quantities follow .
however , @xmath2 and @xmath56 also change as the integration procedes , so we need to know how they change . from equation([elldef ] ) we find @xmath57 note that an ingoing geodesic that goes through @xmath58 becomes an outgoing geodesic , where this change is implemented as a change in the sign of @xmath42 .
we must evolve the system of equations ( [ main]-[evolvea ] ) . to do this
, we must be able to evaluate all quantities on the right hand sides of these equations from just @xmath2 and @xmath56 , that is , we must be able to find @xmath59 and @xmath60 .
given @xmath2 and @xmath56 we obtain @xmath61 and thus we find all specified functions of @xmath4 such as @xmath62 and @xmath5 . from equation ( [ adotsquared ] )
we obtain @xmath63 which then yields @xmath64 since @xmath65 . differentiating equation ( [ timediff ] ) with respect to @xmath4 and solving for @xmath66 yields @xmath67 where @xmath68\ ] ] with @xmath69 .
this then yields @xmath70 through @xmath71 .
finally , differentiating equation ( [ adot ] ) with respect to @xmath4 yields @xmath72 which in turn yields @xmath60 through @xmath73
. what remains is then simply to find the initial values of @xmath2 and @xmath56 for each point in our past light cone , along with the coresponding values of the redshift @xmath74 .
as shown in @xcite this can be done by integrating equations ( [ evolver]-[evolvea ] ) from our current position , along with the evolution equation for the redshift @xmath75 for this integration , the initial value of @xmath2 is zero , while the initial value of @xmath56 is given by @xmath76 where @xmath77 is the ratio of the density in matter to the critical density .
in the models of @xcite a choice of @xmath77 is made , and the function @xmath62 takes the form @xmath78 where the constant @xmath79 is chosen for best fit with the supernova data . in particular , the two models considered are ( i ) @xmath80 , which gives rise to @xmath81 , and ( ii ) @xmath82 , which gives rise to @xmath83 .
each of these models fits the supernova data about as well as the standard concordance cosmology . because @xmath84 at large @xmath4 , these models are asymptotically @xmath85 frw cosmologies with an underdensity in a region near the center
note that the large value of @xmath79 means that in these models we live in an underdensity of fairly small size .
using the method of the previous section , we calculate the velocity of the dust with respect to the cmb for each point on our past light cone .
the results are shown in figures ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) . here
figure ( 1 ) is for the @xmath86 model and figure ( 2 ) is for the @xmath87 model .
also plotted on the figures are the results of observations of the ksz effect for galaxy clusters.@xcite plot of velocity ( in units of km / s ) _ vs _ redshift for the @xmath88 ltb model ] plot of velocity ( in units of km / s ) _ vs _ redshift for the @xmath89 ltb model ] the observations clearly rule out the @xmath89 model .
in addition , the @xmath88 model does not provide a good fit to the observations , so this model may also be ruled out .
any successful ltb model must pass both the supernova test and the ksz test .
together these tests provide a powerful constraint that rules out the models of @xcite .
however , the models of @xcite were chosen on the basis of simplicity and fitting the supernova test ; so it is not surprising that one additional test suffices to rule them out .
it is therefore possible that reasonable ltb models could be made that have fair agreement with both the supernova data and the ksz data .
however , as ksz measurements improve in accuracy , this test will become more stringent and might eventually rule out all ltb models .
i would like to thank nick kaiser and juan garcia - bellido for helpful discussions .
this work was supported by nsf grants phy-0456655 and phy-0855532 to oakland university . | observations of type ia supernovae assumption universe homogeneous indicate expansion accelerating acceleration necessitates exotic matter dark energy accounted for by cosmological constant scale cosmological constant small ( in planck units for alternative explanations account for supernova data using comsmological model inhomogeneous simplest models are lematre - tolman - bondi(ltb ) spacetimes spherically symmetric spacetimes with pressureless fluid ( dust ) as matter models can account for supernova data standard homogeneous concordance cosmology test difference between concordance cosmology and inhomogeneous cosmology different test needed kinematic sunyaev - zeldovich ( ksz ) effect effect cosmic microwave photons scatter off gas in galaxy cluster spectrum photons depends on velocity galaxy cluster analysis of cmb find velocity each ltb model must compared to supernova data ksz data only models match both sets data viable analyses of ksz effect for particular ltb models performed general analysis for inhomogeneous models each ltb model different must seperately subjected to ksz test supernova testpaper present method velocity galaxy clusters in ltb models apply to models@xcite section 2 presents method calculating velocities section 3 applies models@xcite conclusions section 4 metric in ltb spacetimes form @xmath1 area radius @xmath2 function of coordinates @xmath3 @xmath4 function @xmath5 function @xmath4 overdot denotes derivative @xmath3 prime denotes derivative @xmath4 ltb spacetime prefered timelike vector @xmath6 four - velocity of dust spacetime cosmic microwave background prefered vector @xmath7 four - velocity of cmb spacetime spherically symmetric preferred unit spacelike vector @xmath8 @xmath9 outgoing null @xmath10 ingoing null ltb four - velocity @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 velocity ltb observer cmb @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 ingoing and outgoing cmb photons same frequency @xmath17 measured cmb rest frame vectors form @xmath18 define quantity @xmath19 by @xmath20 @xmath21 restrict attention to times cmb decoupled from matter @xmath22 null geodesicsfind velocity galaxies behavior null geodesics in ltb spacetimes recall facts ltb spacetimes einstein field equation @xmath23 function @xmath24 depends on @xmath4 density by @xmath25 introduce quantities @xmath26 @xmath27 by @xmath28 equation becomes @xmath29 solution @xmath30 @xmath31 function of @xmath4 time shell dust @xmath4 shrinks to zero radius big bang singularity chose @xmath32 coordinate freedom change @xmath4 set @xmath27 constant @xmath33 ltb model determined by function @xmath34 @xmath35 ltb solution becomes standard dust cosmology with @xmath36 future null geodesic @xmath37 define quantity @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 sign @xmath42 depends on @xmath37 outgoing or ingoing definition @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath43 to @xmath16 @xmath46follows from form ltb metric @xmath47 using geodesic equation find @xmath48 follows @xmath49 + \epsilon {\sqrt { 1+f }{main use equation main find velocity @xmath13 of dust relative to cmb chosen @xmath32 early times spacetimes becomes frw frw spacetimes @xmath50 @xmath43 constant for cmb photons average energy constant call @xmath51 same for outgoing ingoing photons integrating equation main ) calculate @xmath13 big bang yields @xmath52 obtain @xmath53 @xmath54 allows calculate @xmath55 velocity @xmath13 numerically integrate equation ( main ] ) need evaluate all quantities on right hand side equation all points integration needed know @xmath2 @xmath56 rest quantities follow @xmath2 @xmath56 change as integration procedes need know from equation([elldef ) find @xmath57 ingoing geodesic goes through @xmath58 becomes outgoing geodesic change implemented as change in sign of @xmath42 evolve system of equations ( main- )evaluate quantities right sides equations from @xmath2 @xmath56 find @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath2 obtain @xmath61 find functions of @xmath4 @xmath62 @xmath5 equation adotsquared obtain @xmath63 yields @xmath64 since @xmath65 differentiating equation timediff @xmath4 @xmath66 yields @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 yields @xmath70 through @xmath71 differentiating equation adot @xmath4 yields @xmath72 yields @xmath60 through @xmath73 find initial values of @xmath2 @xmath56 for each point past light cone coresponding values redshift @xmath74 integrating equations evolver]-[evolvea current position evolution equation for redshift @xmath75 initial value @xmath2 is zero initial value @xmath56 by @xmath76 @xmath77 ratio density matter to critical density models @xcite choice @xmath77 function @xmath62 takes form @xmath78 constant @xmath79 chosen for best fit with supernova data two models considered @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83models fits supernova data standard concordance cosmology @xmath84 at large @xmath4 models are asymptotically @xmath85 frw cosmologies underdensity near center large value of @xmath79 means models in underdensity small size calculate velocity dust cmb for each point on past light cone results shown in figures ( 1 ) ( 2 ) figure 1 ) for @xmath86 model 2 @xmath87 model results observations ksz effect for galaxy clusters.@xcite plot velocity km / s ) vs @xmath88 model observations rule out @xmath89 model @xmath88 model good fit model may be ruled out successful ltb model must pass supernova test ksz test tests constraint rules out models @xcite models @xcite chosen simplicity fitting supernova test one additional test suffices to rule out possible reasonable ltb models be fair agreement with supernova data ksz data as ksz measurements improve test more stringent might rule out all ltb models thank nick kaiser juan garcia - bellido for discussions work supported by nsf grants phy-0456655 phy-0855532 to oakland university | 0.35737 | 2,566 | 1,381 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,718 | in this paper we present an explicit construction of a relative symplectic packing . this confirms the sharpness of the upper bound for the relative packing of a ball into the pair @xmath0 of the standard complex projective plane and the clifford torus , obtained by biran and cornea . | in this note we present an explicit construction of a relative packing .
the subject of symplectic packing was introduced first in the seminal work of gromov @xcite .
gromov showed that looking at symplectic embeddings of a standard ball into a symplectic manifold , one may obtain an upper bound on the radius of a ball which is stronger than the obstruction coming from the volume .
the first theorem in this direction is a non - squeezing theorem from @xcite .
this result has led to the definition of the gromov capacity , which plays an important role in modern symplectic geometry .
later the subject of symplectic packing was treated by biran , karshon , mcduff , polterovich , schlenk , traynor and others , see @xcite .
new obstructions for symplectic packings of various domains were found . on the other hand
, attempts were made to find explicit constructions of certain symplectic embeddings , in order to show that the obstructions , which were found , are tight ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
this note is devoted to proving a new result in this direction .
recently , biran and cornea @xcite found new obstructions on the relative symplectic packing in a number of situations , which are stronger than those in the case of a usual packing . in this note
we consider one specific example from @xcite , and show that the corresponding obstruction is sharp .
let us define first the notion of a relative symplectic packing .
consider a symplectic manifold @xmath1 and a closed lagrangian submanifold @xmath2 .
take a standard open ball @xmath3 of radius @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is endowed with coordinates @xmath6 , and set @xmath7 a relative packing of @xmath8 into @xmath9 is by definition a symplectic embedding @xmath10 such that @xmath11 . in this note
we treat the situation where @xmath12 and @xmath13 is the standard clifford torus in @xmath14 . here , @xmath15 is normalized so that @xmath16 . in @xcite
it was shown that given a relative packing @xmath17 there is an upper bound for the radius of this ball : @xmath18 .
our main result is the following .
[ t : pack example ] for every @xmath19 there exists a relative packing @xmath20 let us mention that in @xcite , the authors also consider relative packings into @xmath21 by more than one ball , and obtain obstructions on their radii .
the case of three balls was treated , and is strongly connected to the properties of the quantum cup - product in floer homology .
the hypothetical upper bound in this case was found , under the assumption of existence of pseudo - holomorphic discs with certain properties . it still remains to show the existence of such discs , and in the case that it will be proved , one can try to find the example which proves the tightness of this upper bound .
the rest of the paper is devoted to proving theorem [ t : pack example ] . in section [ s : constrover ]
we show how to reduce theorem [ t : pack example ] to a two - dimensional problem .
section [ s : proofs ] contains the proof of theorem [ t : pack example ] .
it is well - known that the open symplectic manifold @xmath22 is symplectomorphic to the unit ball @xmath23 . identifying @xmath24
, we have a natural action of the torus @xmath25 on @xmath26 .
the moment map of this action is given by @xmath27 the action of @xmath28 , restricted to the complement @xmath29 of the union of the two complex axes is free , and therefore , by a standard procedure , we obtain that @xmath29 is symplectomorphic to @xmath30 . here
we use the notation @xmath31 look now at @xmath32 and its subset @xmath33 , where @xmath34 the above symplectomorphism between @xmath29 and @xmath30 induces a symplectic embedding @xmath35 from now on we will consider @xmath36 as @xmath37 @xmath38 and the symplectic form is @xmath39 the clifford torus lies entirely in @xmath40 , and its pre - image under the map @xmath41 equals to @xmath42 fix @xmath19 and consider @xmath43 the construction is based on finding a certain area - preserving map @xmath44 given such an @xmath45 , we define @xmath46 as @xmath47 our aim is to find @xmath45 such that the image of @xmath48 under the map @xmath49 will be contained in @xmath50 , and also @xmath51
given @xmath19 , we describe a construction of a relative symplectic embedding @xmath52 as it was shown in section [ s : constrover ] , it is enough to find a symplectic embedding @xmath53 such that its image will be contained in the domain @xmath54 take @xmath66 , and consider the corresponding map @xmath45 .
then for any @xmath67 , such that @xmath68 , define @xmath47 we claim that the resulting map @xmath69 satisfies the desired properties .
first of all , it is clear that the map @xmath49 is a symplectic embedding , and the pre - image of @xmath70 equals @xmath71 .
let us show that , moreover , the image of @xmath49 lies in the domain @xmath72 the presented relative packing construction can be naturally generalized to the corresponding construction of a relative packing of a ball @xmath78 into @xmath79 , for any @xmath80 and radius @xmath81 .
this confirms the sharpness of the upper bound for the radius , obtained by biran and cornea @xcite , for an arbitrary dimension .
p. biran , _ from symplectic packing to algebraic geometry and back _ , proceedings of the 3rd european congress of mathematics ( barcelona 2000 ) , vol .
ii , 507 - 524 , progr .
, * 202 * , birkhauser , basel , 2001 . | present explicit construction relative packing symplectic packing introduced in gromov @xcite gromov showed symplectic embeddings standard ball manifold upper bound radius stronger than obstruction volume first theorem non - squeezing theorem from @xcite result led to definition gromov capacity important role in modern symplectic geometry symplectic packing treated by biran karshon mcduff polterovich schlenk traynor others new obstructions for symplectic packings found attempts find explicit constructions symplectic embeddings show obstructions tight @xcite note devoted proving new result biran cornea @xcite found new obstructions on relative symplectic packing stronger than usual packing consider specific example from @xcite corresponding obstruction sharp define notion relative symplectic packing consider symplectic manifold @xmath1 closed lagrangian submanifold @xmath2 standard open ball @xmath3 radius @xmath4 @xmath5 endowed coordinates @xmath6 set @xmath7 relative packing of @xmath8 into @xmath9 is symplectic embedding @xmath10 @xmath11note treat situation @xmath12 @xmath13 standard clifford torus in @xmath14 @xmath15 normalized @xmath16 @xcite shown relative packing @xmath17 upper bound for radius ball @xmath18 main result every @xmath19 relative packing @xmath20 @xcite authors consider relative packings @xmath21 more than one ball obtain obstructions on radii case three balls treated connected to properties quantum cup - product floer homology hypothetical upper bound found assumption existence pseudo - holomorphic discs properties remains show existence discs find example tightness upper bound rest paper proving theorem [ t : pack example ] section s : constrover reduce theorem to two - dimensional problem section s : proofs proof theorem open symplectic manifold @xmath22 symplectomorphic to unit ball @xmath23 identifying @xmath24 natural action of torus @xmath25 on @xmath26 moment map action given by @xmath27 action @xmath28 restricted complement @xmath29 union two complex axes free standard procedure obtain @xmath29 symplectomorphic to @xmath30use notation @xmath31 @xmath32 subset @xmath33 @xmath34 symplectomorphism between @xmath29 @xmath30 induces symplectic embedding @xmath35 consider @xmath36 as @xmath37 @xmath38 symplectic form @xmath39 clifford torus in @xmath40 pre - image map @xmath41 equals @xmath42 fix @xmath19 consider @xmath43 construction area - preserving map @xmath44 define @xmath46 as @xmath47 aim find @xmath45 image @xmath48 map @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath19 construction relative symplectic embedding @xmath52 find symplectic embedding @xmath53 image domain @xmath54 @xmath66 consider corresponding map @xmath45 @xmath67 @xmath68 define @xmath47 resulting map @xmath69 satisfies desired properties map @xmath49 symplectic embedding pre - image @xmath70 equals @xmath71 image @xmath49 in domain @xmath72 relative packing construction generalized ball @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 radius @xmath81 confirms sharpness upper bound radius biran cornea arbitrary dimensionbiran symplectic packing algebraic geometry proceedings 3rd european congress mathematics barcelona 2000 vol ii 507 - 524 birkhauser basel 2001 | 0.258619 | 1,383 | 757 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,721 | two phase picture is a simple and effective methodology to capture the nonequilibrium dynamics of polymer associated with tension propagation .
when applying it to the driven translocation process , there is a point to be noted , as briefly discussed in our recent article [ phys .
rev .
e * 85 * , 061803 ( 2012 ) ] . in this article
, we address this issue in detail and modify our previous prediction [ euro .
phys .
j. e * 34 * , 135 ( 2011 ) ] by adopting an alternative steady - state ansatz .
the modified scaling prediction turns out to be the same as that of the iso - flux model recently proposed by rowghanian and grosberg [ j. phys .
chem .
b * 115 * , 14127 - 14135 ( 2011 ) ] .
# 1 # 1 tension - propagation mechanism is inherent in the dynamical response of polymers to local stimuli .
sometime ago , it has been proposed as an essential ingredient governing the driven translocation process @xcite .
such a view seems to have been well validated in recent studies @xcite . in ref .
@xcite , we analyzed in detail the translocation dynamics based on two phase formalism , in which the portion of the translocation polymer in _ cis _ side is pictured to be composed of the moving and the yet quiescent equilibrium domains .
the point of the formalism is to focus on the dynamics of the domain boundary , which is a gross variable describing how the driving force at the pore site is transmitted along the chain backbone .
for such a coarse - graining to be meaningful , other degrees of freedom need to be properly eliminated , the effect of which should be reflected in the behaviors of the gross variable .
most naturally , the moving domain is assumed to be in a steady - state with a characteristic velocity @xmath0 .
then , the steady - state dynamical friction / extension laws are coupled to the continuum equation describing the conservation of the mass . in our earlier article @xcite
, we set @xmath1 , where @xmath2 represents the segment velocity around the rear end of the moving domain .
this steady - state ansatz , however , turned to be not compatible with the mass conservation relation inherent in the translocation process .
this point was shortly mentioned in the appendix of our article @xcite . to make the point clearer
, we present a detailed account in this article , where our previous result @xcite is modified by adopting an alternative steady - state ansatz suggested in refs .
@xcite .
we then point out that the alternative ansatz is intimately related with the iso - flux model @xcite . _
basic equations_ let us consider the driven translocation process as schematically depicted in fig . 1 .
a polymeric chain is initially dissolved in the solution ( @xmath3 ) , taking a random coil conformation with the overall size @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is the total segment number , @xmath6 is the segment length , and @xmath7 is the flory exponent . as those in ref .
@xcite , the length , force and time are made dimensionless by the units @xmath6 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 , respectively ( @xmath10 is the thermal energy ; @xmath11 is the viscosity of the solvent ) .
there is a thin wall at @xmath12 with a small pore , where the driving force with the constant magnitude @xmath13 is locally exerted in @xmath14-direction from the _ cis _ to the _ trans _ side .
one chain end is sucked at time @xmath15 .
the translocation process , then , proceeds with the tension propagation along the chain .
segments are numbered from the first sucked end to the other end ( @xmath5th segment ) . according to the so - called two phase formalism
, the dynamics of driven translocation is described as the growth process of the moving tensed domain , which is specified by the segment @xmath16 at the end of the moving domain , the segment @xmath17 at the pore , the size @xmath18 and the representative ( or average ) velocity @xmath0 of the moving domain at time @xmath19 ( see fig . 1 ) .
these can be determined by the following set of equations : @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 where @xmath24 and @xmath25 are the segment fluxes at the moving domain boundary and at the pore , respectively . as explained in ref .
@xcite , eq .
( [ eq:1 ] ) is the continuum equation , eqs .
( [ eq:2 ] ) and ( [ eq:3 ] ) are the dynamical equations of state describing the steady - state relation among velocity - extension - force ( eq .
( [ eq:2 ] ) ) and mass - extension - force ( eq . ( [ eq:3 ] ) ) for a dragged polymer , where @xmath26 and @xmath27 in trumpet regime @xmath28 , while @xmath29 and @xmath30 for stronger force @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 , see ref . @xcite .
strong force regimes are further classified as the stem - flower ( @xmath34 ) and the strong - stretching ( @xmath35 ) . ] .
note that , while the segment line density at the pore @xmath36 is given by the exponent related to equilibrium ( static ) situation , eq . ( [ eq:2 ] )
reflects the dissipation mechanism through the exponent @xmath37 , which contains the dynamical exponent @xmath38 characterizing the dynamics of critical fluctuation " .
_ ansatz ( i)_ in ref .
@xcite , we eliminate the pore flux @xmath39 in eq .
( [ eq:1 ] ) and made the steady - state ansatz for the moving domain by setting @xmath40 , which leads to @xmath41 combining this with eqs .
( [ eq:2 ] ) , ( [ eq:4 ] ) and the segment line density at the boundary @xmath42 , where @xmath43 $ ] for @xmath44 and @xmath45 for larger force , one obtains the tension - propagation law @xmath46 with @xmath47 and @xmath48 , thus , the scaling formula for propagation time is @xmath49 with @xmath50 .
_ ansatz ( ii)_ an alternative steady - state ansatz is to set @xmath51 as was done in ref .
@xcite .
then , combining eqs .
( [ eq:3 ] ) and ( [ eq:5 ] ) , we obtain @xmath52 where eqs .
( [ eq:2 ] ) , ( [ eq:4 ] ) and the expression for the line density at the pore ( see eq .
( [ eq:3 ] ) ) are used .
the tension propagation law and the propagation time in leading order can be expressed in the form of eqs .
( [ eq:7 ] ) and ( [ eq:8 ] ) , respectively , but now the exponent @xmath53 and @xmath54 are modified as @xmath55 and @xmath56 .
the deduced exponents coincide with those based on the iso - flux model @xcite ( see below ) .
the difference in the dynamical evolutions of the number @xmath17 of the translocated segments depending on the adopted ansatz is plotted in fig .
[ fig2 ] .
the inflection points in fig .
[ fig2](a ) correspond to the end of the propagation stage , when most of segments have been already sucked .
the subsequent post - propagation stage can be analyzed using eqs .
( [ eq:6])/([fore_mass_cons ] ) @xcite , where , in contrast to the propagation stage , the growth rate in @xmath17 increases with time due to the decrease in the overall friction with the process advanced . as shown in fig .
2(b ) , the growth of @xmath17 in the propagation stage follows the asymptotic dynamical scaling @xmath57 , with the slight deviation in the early period due to the finite - size effect . of the translocated segments as a function of time calculated according to the steady - state ansatz ( i ) or ( ii ) with @xmath58 , @xmath59 and @xmath60 .
( a ) entire process in normal scale .
( b ) propagation stage in double - logarithmic scale .
the dashed lines represent the asymptotic scaling with the slope @xmath61 . ] _ iso - flux model_ we now attempt to resolve the discrepancy between the above two results . the analysis of eqs .
( [ eq:1 ] ) , ( [ eq:3 ] ) and ( [ eq:4 ] ) reveals a unique property of the moving domain in the translocation process .
given the average relation eq .
( [ eq:4 ] ) between @xmath18 and @xmath16 , one can show that the last terms in eqs .
( [ eq:1 ] ) and ( [ eq:3 ] ) are irrelevant , i.e. , @xmath62 and @xmath63 .. since @xmath64 , this leads to the inequality @xmath65 . eliminating @xmath66 through @xmath67}$ ] , one finds @xmath68 , which is equivalent to be proven with eq .
( [ eq:4 ] ) .
second inequality : using eq .
( [ eq:4 ] ) , this can be rewritten as @xmath69 , which holds under the condition @xmath70 of interest . ]
it then follows that @xmath71 and @xmath72 in the scaling level , the fluxes into and out of moving domains balance , as was recently proposed by rowghanian and grosberg @xcite . to check the validity of the steady - state approximation ,
let us set @xmath73 with @xmath74 $ ] so that @xmath75 and @xmath76 .
the iso - flux condition eq .
( [ eq:11 ] ) is written as @xmath77 \simeq \sigma_r [ v(t)-\delta v_r(t ) ] \nonumber \\ \leftrightarrow & & 1+\frac{\delta v_0}{v } \simeq w(t)^q \left ( 1- \frac{\delta v_r}{v } \right)^{1-q } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath78 with @xmath79 for @xmath80 and @xmath81 for @xmath31 satisfies @xmath82 ( eq .
( [ eq:2 ] ) ) in the stem - flower regime . ] . given the longest relaxation time @xmath83 of the steadily driven domain and the typical shear rate @xmath84 , the steady - state approximation implicitly assumes the condition @xmath85 .
this self - consistency condition is satisfied for the ansatz ( ii ) , i.e. , @xmath86 v < v$ ] , but not for the ansatz ( i ) , i.e. , @xmath87 v$ ] in the force range @xmath44 where @xmath88 . to summarize ,
the unique driving mode inherent in the translocation process is manifested in the iso - flux condition , which is to be contrasted with the mechanical driving by pulling chain end @xcite .
in the latter , the moving domain is constituted of all the @xmath16 segments , so that eqs .
( [ eq:3 ] ) and ( [ eq:4 ] ) are modified as @xmath89 and @xmath90 , respectively .
it has turned out that our previous ansatz and corresponding predictions @xcite are incompatible with the iso - flux condition . from purely theoretical point of view @xcite ,
the scaling of the propagation time ( thus , the translocation time ) is given by @xmath91 it is somewhat puzzling that the prediction based on the ansatz ( i ) seem to be better correlated with numerical and real experiments @xcite . this might be ascribed to finite - size effects and various crossovers detailed in ref .
@xcite ;
( i ) the last term in eq .
( [ eq:9 ] ) serves as a correction term to the tension - propagation scaling law ( see the inequality above eq .
( [ eq:10 ] ) ) .
( ii ) the post - propagation stage adds a correction term to the translocation time .
( iii ) iso - flux condition ( eqs . ( [ eq:10 ] ) and ( [ eq:11 ] ) ) is also influenced by the finite - size correction .
these effects may be enhanced in realistic situations due to the wall and/or the _ trans_-side effects , which would be dependent on the size and properties of the pore etc . since the pore flux would be sensitive to such specific pore effects , one
may then be tempted to remove the pore flux ( eq .
( [ eq:5 ] ) ) from eq .
( [ eq:1 ] ) and to follow the route of the ansatz ( i ) .
if the outgoing flux @xmath92 is suppressed enough compared to that expected from the iso - flux condition , the description based on the steady - state ansatz ( i ) may attain its apparent suitability .
a very recent theoretical study based on a more accurate " two phase description seems to support such a view @xcite , where it has been shown that the frictional interaction between the pore and the polymer significantly affects the dynamics for polymers with experimentally relevant , finite chain length . | this work was supported in part by the jsps core - to - core program international research network for non - equilibrium dynamics of soft matter " , and kyushu university interdisciplinary programs in education and projects in research development . | work supported jsps program international research network non - equilibrium dynamics soft matter kyushu university programs education projects research | 0.064763 | 45 | 22 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,725 | we solve the non - local eigenvalue problem that arose from consideration of the adjoint sector of the @xmath0 matrix model in @xcite .
we obtain the exact wavefunction and a scattering phase that matches the string theory calculation . 0 | the motivation for this paper is to solve exactly an eigenvalue problem that arises in @xcite and show that the exact scattering phase we obtain matches the string theory calculation .
this provides further confirmation of the duality between the nonsinglet sectors of the @xmath1 matrix model and time dependent long string configurations in @xmath0 string theory .
the problem is @xmath2 which can also be written as @xmath3 where @xmath4 .
it arises in general when one tries to compute the meson ( i.e. adjoint sector ) spectrum of the @xmath1 matrix model @xcite .
as opposed to the singlet sector , which for a general potential reduces to @xmath5 independent fermions , the non - singlet sector hamiltonian includes interactions between the different eigenvalues .
this interaction piece can be treated perturbatively in @xmath6 @xcite , and when , as in @xcite , one is interested in the double scaling limit around an inverted harmonic oscillator potential , the problem reduces to ( [ eq : first ] ) .
we obtain the exact eigenstate of the above problem for any @xmath7 by summing up a perturbation series .
the answer we get looks very simple , and there may be another , easier way of obtaining it .
we set up the problem following the notation of @xcite .
the eigenvalue equation ( [ eq : first ] ) can be written in fourier space as : @xmath8 to start we take @xmath9 . in @xmath10 space this corresponds to a wave with very negative energy bouncing off an essentially linear potential . in @xmath11 space
the picture is a wave with very positive energy which barrels through the potential very fast , so that its kinetic term is essentially linear , i.e. having a relativistic dispersion : @xmath12 the solution is @xmath13 @xmath14 for large @xmath10 we can fourier transform back and obtain ( up to overall phase ) in front of the @xmath15 , and also it is not taken into account that because of the @xmath16 in front of the term quadratic in @xmath11 in ( b.6 ) the determinants arising from the gaussian integrals have a relative factor of @xmath17 . ]
@xmath18 moving away from the strict limit @xmath9 we will have a scattering phase @xmath19 the idea is now to compute the phase @xmath20 by expanding the wave - function in powers of @xmath21 . in @xcite
the first correction is computed and at that order matches the conjectured exact result @xmath22 the perturbed wave - function that is obtained there has a singularity at @xmath23 .
this presumably reflects the fact that in @xmath10 space the wave - function is unstable to tunneling under the barrier .
when we sum up all the corrections the singularities will turn out to add up to a branch cut , and when we anti - symmetrize properly the branch cut will disappear .
we will then explicitly verify the solution .
for now , we write the purported solution : @xmath24and plug it in .
we could have a priori made the expansion a prefactor multiplying the exponential , but a little experimentation shows that it is easiest to do the expansion inside the exponent . as in @xcite
we obtain for the first correction : @xmath25 @xmath26 continuing and computing @xmath27 leads us to conjecture that the general correction will take the form @xmath28 where @xmath29 and @xmath30 are unknown coefficients . plugging into ( [ eq : eigen ] ) we obtain recursion relations that determine all the @xmath29 and @xmath30 .
the goal in the next subsection is to solve these .
first , it will be useful to note that @xmath31_k^{k-2i}\\ = \left(-{2 a_n \over n } \right ) { 1 \over ( e^{\pi k } - e^{-\pi k})^{2n}}. \end{split}\ ] ] and thus @xmath32 to keep expressions manageable , we define generating functions that encode the information in the @xmath29 and @xmath30 : @xmath33 we see that the combination @xmath34 appears a lot , so henceforth we set @xmath35 we will suppress the argument @xmath11 when no ambiguity can arise . to avoid messy equations ,
let us label by @xmath36 the derivative with respect to @xmath11 of the exponent in ( [ eq : purport ] ) : @xmath37 for conciseness we have omitted the dependence of @xmath36 on @xmath7 in the notation .
now , by expanding the @xmath38 in ( [ eq : eigen ] ) and using ( [ eq : diff ] ) we obtain the following @xmath39\\ = -a(k ) + { 2 \over 1 - x e^{-2f(x ) } } a(k ) + { 2 x e^{-2f(x ) } \over ( 1 - x e^{-2f(x)})^2 } \left({2i \over \tanh \pi k } - { 4i \over \tanh \pi k } x f'(x ) \right ) .
\end{split } \label{eq : long}\ ] ] we also note that @xmath40 so that ( [ eq : long ] ) becomes @xmath41\\ + { 4ixe^{-2f } \over \left(1-xe^{-2f}\right)^2 } { 1 \over \tanh \pi k } \left(1 - 2xf ' \right ) .
\label{eq : diffeq } \end{split}\ ] ] let us solve this equation .
first off , the terms proportional to @xmath42 must be equal , so that @xmath43 which can be reduced to the form @xmath44 this is solved by @xmath45 setting the remainder of the terms in ( [ eq : diffeq ] ) equal to each other we get @xmath46 now that we ve solved for the @xmath29 and @xmath30 we plug in to get the final form of the solution . integrating by parts we first obtain @xmath47 summing , @xmath48 after some easy algebraic manipulation of the terms above that involve @xmath49 , we get that the total exponent in ( [ eq : purport ] ) is @xmath50 so the purported solution is @xmath51 substituting in @xmath52 for @xmath53 , we obtain @xmath54 .
there are some problems with the above solution .
for one , the square root will have a branch cut , and we will have to decide where it goes .
the most naive choice of the branch cut ( which avoids the real @xmath11 axis altogether ) makes the exponent in ( [ eq : soln ] ) an even function of @xmath11 , and makes the solution odd in @xmath11 .
this means that for both large positive @xmath11 and large negative @xmath11 the wavefunction is outgoing ( or incoming , depending on conventions ) , and that we have two purported independent solutions ( for the two signs of the square root ) .
there is no local conservation so this might not be a problem , though by building wavepackets one might run into problems with unitarity ( have two packets that collide and disappear ) .
it should be noted , however , that this choice of branch cut makes the exponent in the perturbed solution ( [ eq : soln ] ) not converge to that of the unperturbed solution ( [ eq : pert ] ) as @xmath7 goes to minus infinity . instead , from the standpoint of the perturbation expansion it is more natural to choose the branch cut to bisect the real @xmath11 axis at @xmath23 .
also , when computing the first perturbative correction to the phase shift , @xcite integrates around the singularity at @xmath23 ; as successive more singular terms in the expansion pile up at @xmath23 , they fatten up into a branch cut that bisects the real @xmath11 axis at @xmath23 . with this choice of branch cut ,
the function one obtains is not smooth at @xmath23 , and is not odd in @xmath11 .
however , after anti - symmetrization , it becomes odd and smooth at @xmath23 .
in fact , it becomes analytic on the entire complex @xmath11 plane , a fact which we will need in verifying that it indeed satisfies ( [ eq : eigen ] ) . before we prove these things ,
let us summarize .
we choose the branch cut in the wavefunction to go through @xmath23 , in order to have a solution that approaches the unperturbed solution when @xmath7 goes to minus infinity . after anti - symmetrization
we will show that we obtain an analytic wavefunction . by plugging in ,
we independently verify in the next section that it does satisfy ( [ eq : eigen ] ) .
it is the only combination of the two branches that can be verified to satisfy ( [ eq : eigen ] ) using the method in the next section .
so even though there are other branches that give different wavefunctions that are smooth for real @xmath11 ( such as the ones discussed in the first paragraph of this section ) , they can not be verified using the methods of the next section .
we believe that these other branches in fact do not satisfy ( [ eq : eigen ] ) , though we do not prove this uniqueness statement .
let us now proceed systematically .
first , the integrand in the exponent of ( [ eq : soln ] ) has branch points whenever @xmath55 and defines a riemann surface which is a double cover of the complex @xmath11-plane .
what is not so obvious , but nevertheless true , is that the whole solution ( [ eq : soln ] ) is a well defined function on this riemann surface .
let us see why this is so .
first , we need a branch cut structure for @xmath56 - for definiteness , take the one discussed above ( the one that goes through @xmath23 ) . to continue
, it will be useful to relate @xmath57 to @xmath58 .
we have @xmath59 for definiteness take @xmath11 real and positive .
the integral in the exponent is @xmath60 the first term is easily evaluated to be @xmath61 .
the second one is trickier . letting @xmath62 and @xmath63 we see that it is equal to @xmath64 = 5.5 cm with the branch cut of @xmath65 going from @xmath66 to @xmath17 we can take that of the logarithm to run along the positive @xmath67 axis and deform the integration contour away to infinity as shown in figure [ w1 ] .
the two horizontal segments do not quite cancel because of the discontinuity in the logarithm , but together they yield an easily calculable contribution .
likewise , the contribution from large @xmath67 also does not vanish , but is easily calculable .
the integral , in the limit of @xmath68 going to infinity , is then @xmath69 = \\ 2 \pi i + 2 \pi \eh + 2 \log \left ( { \sinh \pi k \over e^{\pi \eh } } + \sqrt{1+{\sinh^2 \pi k \over e^{2 \pi \eh } } } \right ) \end{split}\ ] ] and so @xmath70 as one can straightforwardly verify , this equation relating @xmath71 to its translates by @xmath72 is the essential ingredient showing that ( [ eq : soln ] ) has the same branching structure as @xmath73 and so is well defined on the same riemann surface .
now it turns out that the function of @xmath11 obtained by summing ( [ eq : soln ] ) over the two preimages of each @xmath11 in the riemann surface is precisely the the antisymmetrization discussed at the beginning of this section . specifically , the function in question is @xmath74 with @xmath75where @xmath76 . from its construction as a sum over preimages we immediately see that @xmath77 is analytic everywhere ( the endpoints of the cuts are the only places where one must take a little care ) .
the fact that it solves ( [ eq : eigen ] ) will be checked presently .
we explicitly verify that @xmath77 is a solution .
we multiply ( [ eq : eigen ] ) through by @xmath78 to obtain @xmath79 now , the operator @xmath80 is just translation by @xmath81 when it acts on @xmath77 .
when it acts on @xmath82 it is not well defined because the branch cuts make the expansion in derivatives fail to converge .
nevertheless , we will prove the above equation is true for @xmath82 , where we will interpret @xmath80 to mean translation by @xmath81 .
this will show that the above is true for @xmath77 , because in that case @xmath80 is both well defined and translation by @xmath81 .
let s take @xmath83 for definiteness .
recall that @xmath84 .
we have @xmath85 recall also ( [ eq : f(k ) ] ) that @xmath86 acting on @xmath83 multiplies it by @xmath87 given these two facts , we compute that the right and left hand sides of ( [ eq : tocheck ] ) ( with @xmath77 replaced by @xmath83 ) are , respectively , @xmath88 and @xmath89 inserting the expression for @xmath90 and using elementary algebra shows that these are indeed equal .
first , we examine the large @xmath11 behavior of the exponent of , say , @xmath91 . we denote it by @xmath92 : @xmath93 where as before @xmath94 .
this integral can not be done in closed form , but by differentiating with respect to @xmath7 under the integral sign one does obtain one that can be done through simple integration by parts .
the result is @xmath95_{k_0 \left(\eh \right)}^k.\ ] ] this can be evaluated quite easily if one notices that it is simply half of the integral from @xmath96 to @xmath11 , with the branch cut chosen to go from @xmath97 to @xmath98 and the contour deformed above it .
thus @xmath99 taking the limit of @xmath11 going to infinity we see that @xmath92 approaches @xmath100 , which is starting to look like the conjectured phase shift ( [ eq : phase ] ) .
let us now figure out some asymptotics .
we spare the reader the easy integrals and state only that in the limit @xmath9 we have @xmath101 and in the limit @xmath102 @xmath103 because we know the derivative of @xmath104 with respect to @xmath7 , we can figure out the phase shift for any energy @xmath7 .
we obtain that for large @xmath11 , @xmath105\ ] ] this matches ( [ eq : phase ] ) .
i would like to thank a. frolov , j. maldacena , a. maloney , j. mcgreevy , and s. shenker for useful conversations .
this work was supported by nsf grant 0244728 .
j. maldacena , `` long strings in two dimensional string theory and non - singlets in the matrix model , '' arxiv : hep - th/0503112 .
g. marchesini and e. onofri , `` planar limit for su(n ) symmetric quantum dynamical systems , '' j. math .
* 21 * , 1103 ( 1980 ) . | motivation paper solve eigenvalue problem in @xcite scattering phase matches string theory calculation duality between nonsinglet sectors @xmath1 matrix model time dependent long string configurations in @xmath0 string theory problem is @xmath2 written as @xmath3 @xmath4 arises meson adjoint sector spectrum of @xmath1 matrix model singlet sector reduces to @xmath5 independent fermions non - singlet sector includes interactions between eigenvalues interaction treated perturbatively in @xmath6 @xcite double scaling limit around inverted harmonic oscillator potential problem reduces to ( [ eq : first ] ) obtain eigenstate for @xmath7 by summing perturbation series answer simple set up problem following notation @xcite eigenvalue equation ( [ eq : first ] ) written as @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 corresponds to wave with negative energy linear potential @xmath11 wave with positive energy through potential fast kinetic term linearrelativistic dispersion : @xmath12 solution @xmath13 @xmath14 large @xmath10 transform back obtain overall phase ) front of @xmath15 not @xmath16 front term quadratic in @xmath11 determinants from gaussian integrals relative factor of @xmath17 @xmath18 strict limit @xmath9 scattering phase @xmath19 compute phase @xmath20 expanding wave - function powers of @xmath21 @xcite first correction computed matches conjectured result @xmath22 perturbed wave - function singularity at @xmath23 reflects @xmath10 space wave - function unstable tunneling under barrier sum corrections singularities add to branch cut anti - symmetrize branch cut disappear verify solution write solution : @xmath24and plug in expansion prefactor multiplying exponential experimentation easiest expansion inside exponent @xcite obtain first correction : @xmath25 @xmath26 computing @xmath27 conjecture general correction form @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 unknown coefficients obtain recursion relations determine @xmath29 and @xmath30 goal next subsection solve these@xmath31_k^{k-2i}\\ = \left(-{2 a_n \over n 1 ( e^{\pi k } - e^{-\pi k})^{2n}} @xmath32 generating functions @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath33 combination @xmath34 set @xmath35 suppress argument @xmath11 no ambiguity label @xmath36 derivative @xmath11 @xmath37 omitted dependence @xmath36 @xmath7 expanding @xmath38 @xmath39\\ = -a(k ) + { 2 \over 1 - x e^{-2f(x )(k ) + 2 x e^{-2f(x ) } ( 1 - x e^{-2f(x)})^2 }\left({2i \over \tanh \pi k } - 4i } x f'(x ) @xmath40 becomes @xmath41\\ + { 4ixe^{-2f } \left(1-xe^{-2f}\right)^2 1 \over \tanh \pi k \left(1 - 2xf \right )\label{eq : diffeq } \end{split} solve equation terms proportional to @xmath42 must be equal @xmath43 reduced to @xmath44 solved by @xmath45 setting remainder terms diffeq equal get @xmath46 solved @xmath29 and @xmath30 plug in final form solution integrating by parts obtain @xmath47 summing @xmath48 algebraic manipulation of terms @xmath49 total exponent purport is @xmath50 solution is @xmath51 substituting @xmath52 for @xmath53 obtain @xmath54 problems with solution square root branch cut decide where it goes naive choice of branch cut avoids @xmath11 axis makes exponent even function of @xmath11 solution odd in @xmath11 for large positive and large negative @xmath11 wavefunction outgoing or incoming two independent solutions for two signs of square root no local conservation problem building wavepackets might problems with unitarity packets collide choice of branch cut makes exponent in perturbed solution eq : soln not converge to unperturbed solution eq pert @xmath7 goes to minus infinity perturbation expansion natural to choose branch cut bisect @xmath11 axis at @xmath23 computing first perturbative correction to phase shift @xcite integrates around singularity at @xmath23 singular terms fatten into branch cut @xmath11 axis at choice branch function not smooth at @xmath23 not odd in @xmath11 after anti - symmetrization becomes odd smooth at @xmath23 becomes analytic on entire complex @xmath11 plane need verifying satisfies ( [ eq : eigen ] ) choose branch cut wavefunction go through @xmath23 solution unperturbed solution when @xmath7 to minus infinity after anti - symmetrization obtain analytic wavefunction verify next ( [ eq : eigen ] ) only combination of two branches can verified to satisfy ( [ eq : eigen ] ) using method next section other branches different wavefunctions smooth for @xmath11 not be verified using methods next section other branches do not satisfy ( [ eq : eigen ] ) not prove uniqueness statement proceed systematicallyintegrand in exponent ( [ eq : soln ] ) has branch points @xmath55 defines riemann surface double cover complex @xmath11-plane whole solution ( [ eq : soln ] ) well defined function on riemann surface need branch cut structure for @xmath56 discussed @xmath23 ) relate @xmath57 to @xmath58 @xmath59 for definiteness take @xmath11 real positive integral exponent is @xmath60 first term evaluated @xmath61 second trickier @xmath62 and @xmath63 equal to @xmath64 = 5.5 cm branch cut @xmath65 from @xmath66 to @xmath17 logarithm along positive @xmath67 axis deform integration contour to infinity figure [ w1 ] two horizontal segments cancel discontinuity yield calculable contribution contribution from @xmath67 easily calculableintegral limit @xmath68 to infinity @xmath69 = 2 \pi i + 2 \pi \eh + 2 \log \left ( { \sinh \pi k \over e^{\pi \eh } } + \sqrt{1+{\sinh^2 \pi k \over e^{2 \pi \eh } } \right ) \end{split @xmath70 equation relating @xmath71 translates @xmath72 essential [ eq : soln ] same branching structure @xmath73 defined riemann surface function @xmath11 summing eq : soln ] two preimages antisymmetrization discussed function @xmath74 with @xmath75where @xmath76 sum preimages @xmath77 analytic everywhere endpoints cuts care solves ( [ eq : eigen ] ) @xmath77 solution multiply [ eq : eigen ] ) @xmath78 obtain @xmath79 operator @xmath80 translation by @xmath81 @xmath77 @xmath82 not defined branch cuts expansion derivatives converge prove equation for @xmath82 interpret @xmath80 translation by @xmath81show above true for @xmath77 @xmath80 defined translation by @xmath81 take @xmath83 for definiteness recall @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 on @xmath83 multiplies by @xmath87 compute right and left sides of eq : tocheck ] @xmath77 replaced by @xmath83 are @xmath88 and @xmath89 expression for @xmath90 elementary algebra shows equal examine large @xmath11 behavior of exponent of @xmath91 denote by @xmath92 : @xmath93 before @xmath94 integral not in closed form differentiating @xmath7 under integral sign simple integration by parts result is @xmath95_{k_0 \left}^k. half of integral from @xmath96 to @xmath11 branch cut from @xmath97 to @xmath98 contour deformed @xmath99 taking limit of @xmath11 to infinity @xmath92 approaches @xmath100 conjectured phase shift figure out asymptotics integrals in limit @xmath9 @xmath101 limit @xmath102 @xmath103 know derivative of @xmath104 @xmath7 figure out phase shift for energy @xmath7obtain @xmath11 matches phase thank frolov j maldacena maloney mcgreevy s shenker conversations work supported nsf grant 0244728 maldacena long strings two dimensional string theory non - singlets matrix model arxiv hep - th/0503112 g. marchesini e. onofri planar limit symmetric quantum dynamical systems j math 1103 1980 | 0.563216 | 3,527 | 1,865 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,731 | the btev / c0 " experiment at fermilab could reconstruct @xmath010@xmath1 charm decays , four orders of magnitude beyond the largest extant sample .
the experiment is likely to run during tevatron run ii ( ca .
20002005 ) .
in addition to
programmatic " charm physics such as spectroscopy , lifetimes , and qcd tests , it will have significant new - physics reach in the areas of _ cp _ violation , flavor - changing neutral - current and lepton - number - violating decays , and @xmath2 mixing , and could observe direct _ cp _ violation in cabibbo - suppressed @xmath3 decays if it occurs at the level predicted by the standard model .
15000 epsf | charm sensitivities have increased exponentially over the last two decades .
current experiments aim to reconstruct @xmath4 events , and the @xmath5 factories and compass facility@xcite could achieve @xmath6-event sensitivity .
we are designing an experiment for the tevatron s c0 area which could reconstruct @xmath7 charm decays during tevatron run ii ( ca .
20002005 ) .
while this `` btev / c0 '' effort aims at both charm and beauty physics , i focus here on charm .
sensitivity at the proposed level will substantially advance such programmatic " charm physics as spectroscopy , lifetimes , and qcd tests .
it will also give substantial new - physics reach in the areas of _ cp _ violation , flavor - changing neutral - current and lepton - number - violating decays , and @xmath2 mixing . if direct _
violation occurs in cabibbo - suppressed @xmath3 decays at the level predicted by the standard model , it could be observable in the btev / c0 experiment .
violation is recognized as one of the central problems of particle physics .
the mechanism(s ) responsible for it have yet to be definitively established . a leading candidate , the kobayashi - maskawa ( km ) model,@xcite has the attractive feature of explaining the small size of @xmath8 asymmetries as a manifestation of the small mixing between the third quark generation and the first two.@xcite thus in the km model , large asymmetries are expected in the beauty sector .
other models attribute the effect to the exchange of massive particles such as @xmath9 s with right - handed coupings or extra higgs scalars.@xcite in these models asymmetries should be more democratic " and may be too small to observe in beauty ( @xmath10@xmath11 ) .
many of these models predict large mixing in charm
. we do not know whether violation arises exclusively from any one of these mechanisms , whether many contribute , or whether some other mechanism not yet thought of is the answer .
thus a balanced program of investigation in all available quark ( and lepton@xcite ) sectors is desirable .
as is well known , -violation , mixing , and rare - decay studies in beauty are the goal of several projects in progress around the world
. such studies in charm are important precisely because the small standard model predictions can allow new physics to appear in a striking manner .
direct _ cp _ violation in charm decay is expected in the standard model ( sm ) at the @xmath12 level@xcite ( see table [ tab : sens ] ) . in the sm it is significant only for singly cabibbo - suppressed decays ( scsd ) , for which tree - level graphs can interfere with penguin diagrams , leading to partial - decay - rate asymmetries : @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the decay width for a @xmath3 meson to final state @xmath15 and @xmath16 that for the _ cp_-conjugate process . [ cols= " < , < , < , < , < " , ] @xmath17 to save space , sources for the measurements and predictions in this table are not cited here ; most may be found in refs.@xcite and @xcite.@xmath18 at 90% confidence level .
these asymmetries reflect interference due to the ckm phase in combination with phase differences from final - state interactions .
experimental evidence suggests substantial final - state effects in charm decay .
for example , the mode @xmath19 occurs with a branching ratio@xcite @xmath20 even though no spectator diagram can produce this final state , and the two possible @xmath9-exchange diagrams cancel each other ( by the gim mechanism ) to good approximation .
this mode could be fed by rescattering of @xmath21 into @xmath22 .
large final - state effects are also evident in the case of multibody charm decays , where dalitz - plot analyses reveal appreciable phase differences.@xcite these and similar observations underlie the expectation of @xmath10@xmath11 direct asymmetries in charm .
additional sm mechanisms for charm violation include @xmath8 mixing and possible mixing with glueballs or gluonic hybrids . as emphasized by xing,@xcite @xmath8
mixing leads to _ cp _ asymmetries of @xmath232re@xmath24 in such decays as @xmath25 and @xmath26 . while perhaps not as interesting as direct charm violation
, this effect might provide a calibration for systematic effects in the measurement of small asymmetries . as discussed below
, it could also represent a unique window into new physics .
close and lipkin@xcite make the intriguing suggestion that @xmath3 s could be mixed with gluonic - hybrid states , with consequent large -violating effects . at present
the best limits on direct _ cp _ violation in cabibbo - suppressed charm decay come from fermilab e687@xcite and e791@xcite and cleo@xcite ( table [ tab : sens ] ) . in fixed - target experiments , to correct for the production asymmetry of @xmath3 _ vs. _ @xmath27 , the asymmetry in a cabibbo - suppressed mode is normalized to that observed in the corresponding cabibbo - favored ( cfd ) mode ; this also has the effect of reducing sensitivity to such systematic effects as trigger , reconstruction , and particle - identification efficiency differences for particles _ vs. _ antiparticles .
in e687 @xmath2310% sensitivity is achieved . by extrapolation from e687 , the definitive establishment of a @xmath12 asymmetry
requires @xmath2810@xmath29 reconstructed @xmath3 s , to give @xmath3010@xmath31 reconstructed charged and ( tagged ) neutral @xmath3 s in scsd modes .
although the ratiometric nature of these measurements makes them intrinsically insensitive to systematic effects , at the sub-@xmath12 level careful attention will be required to keep systematic uncertainties from dominating . for several reasons ,
the charm sector is an excellent place to look for _ cp _ violation arising from physics beyond the standard model : * the top - quark loops that in the standard model dominate violation in the strange and beauty sectors@xcite are absent , creating a low - background window for new physics .
* new physics may couple differently to up - type and down - type quarks@xcite or couple to quark mass.@xcite * compared to beauty , the large production cross sections@xcite allow much larger event samples to be acquired , and the branching ratios to final states of interest are also larger.@xcite * many extensions of the standard model predict observable effects in charm . direct violation in cabibbo - favored or doubly cabibbo - suppressed ( dcsd ) modes would be a clear signature for new physics.@xcite asymmetries in these as well as in scsd modes could reach @xmath3010@xmath32 in such scenarios as non - minimal supersymmetry@xcite and in left - right - symmetric models.@xcite bigi has pointed out that a small new - physics contribution to the dcsd rate could amplify the sm @xmath8-induced asymmetries to @xmath10@xmath33 as well.@xcite many authors have recently emphasized the possibility of observable indirect violation in charm.@xcite@xmath34@xcite this of course depends on charm mixing , which has not been established experimentally.@xcite however , the observation of a wrong - sign signal ( which may be mixing , dcsd , or some mixture of the two ) at cleo@xcite has stimulated theorists to consider the large variety of extensions to the sm in which @xmath35 and @xmath36 can display appreciable -violating mixing .
these include flavor - changing higgs exchange , a fourth generation , @xmath37-mediated fcnc s , left - right symmetry , supersymmetry with quark - squark alignment , leptoquarks , etc.@xcite at the level discussed in the literature , such effects are likely to be observable in a @xmath38-to-@xmath7-charm experiment . as a specific example , i consider a possible indirect asymmetry in @xmath39 .
we would expect @xmath40 tagged @xmath41 decays per few@xmath42 reconstructed charm , giving @xmath43 sensitivity . since here the final state is a eigenstate , the asymmetry is independent of final - state phases and thus directly measures the new - physics phase.@xcite
the btev / c0 experiment will have unprecedented reach in all areas of charm physics , including tests of qcd and hqet in meson and baryon spectroscopy and lifetimes , charm production , dalitz - plot analyses , semileptonic form factors , extraction of ckm elements , etc .
space restrictions preclude further discussion here .
fig . 1 is a sketch of the btev / c0 spectrometer as currently conceived .
the spectrometer is designed for the tevatron c0 collider interaction hall , to be upgraded and expanded during the 1998 main injector construction period .
it differs from existing collider experiments in that it focuses on heavy - quark states produced in the
forward " direction ( @xmath440.3 ) .
this approach allows optimal decay - time resolution and is also advantageous for hadron identification .
the apparatus must have high interaction - rate capability , large acceptance , an efficient charm trigger , high - speed and high - capacity data acquisition , good mass and vertex resolution , and good particle identification .
of these requirements , the most challenging are the trigger and the particle identification .
we intend to trigger primarily on the presence of a decay vertex separated from the primary vertex.@xcite to reduce occupancy and facilitate vertex reconstruction at trigger level 1 , pixel detectors will be used for vertex reconstruction . for efficient , reliable , and compact particle identification
, we will build a ring - imaging cherenkov counter .
in other respects the spectrometer will resemble existing large - aperture fixed - target heavy - quark experiments .
our charm sensitivity goal might be achieved in either collider or fixed - target mode . during tevatron run ii , much early running at c0 may be in fixed - target mode , _
e.g. _ using a wire target in the beam halo .
we have estimated@xcite the fixed - target reconstructed - event yield at @xmath45 per @xmath6 seconds of running for an experiment operating at a 1-mhz interaction rate . given the higher production cross section , comparable or greater sensitivity could be available in collider mode even with reduced running time . in addition , we anticipate increasing the interaction rate beyond 1mhz as the tevatron bunch separation is reduced from 396 to 132ns .
ultimately @xmath235 mhz could be feasible , leading to @xmath46 charm decays reconstructed .
whether fixed - target or collider mode is better for charm physics is a detailed question which probably can not be answered definitively until data are taken .
for one thing , the forward charm - production cross section has not yet been measured in 2tev @xmath47 collisions .
there are also subtleties , for example biases in mixing studies may arise from @xmath48 cascade decays .
these would be suppressed by two orders of magnitude in fixed - target relative to collider mode , due to the reduced beauty production cross section .
a hadroproduction experiment capable of reconstructing @xmath46 charm events is feasible using detector , trigger , and data acquisition technologies that exist or are under development .
such an experiment could observe direct _ cp _ violation in charm decay at the level expected in the standard model and substanially extend the discovery reach for new physics .
m. golden and b. grinstein , phys .
b * 222 * , 501 ( 1989 ) ; f. buccella _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 302 * , 319 ( 1993 ) ; a. pugliese and p. santorelli , in _ proc .
third workshop on the tau / charm factory _ , marbella , spain , 16 june 1993 , edition frontieres ( 1994 ) , p. 387 ; f. buccella _ et al .
_ , phys .
d * 51 * , 3478 ( 1995 ) ; f. buccella , m. lusignoli , and a. pugliese , phys .
b * 379 * , 249 ( 1996 ) .
g. burdman , in * the future of high - sensitivity charm experiments * , d. kaplan and s. kwan , _ eds .
_ , fermilab - conf-94/190 ( 1994 ) p. 75 , and in * workshop on the tau / charm factory * , j. repond , _ ed .
_ , argonne national laboratory , june 2123 , 1995 , aip conf.proc .
349 ( 1996 ) , p. 409 .
p. frabetti _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 331 * , 217 ( 1994 ) ; j. e. wiss , in * workshop on the tau / charm factory * , argonne national laboratory , june 2123 , 1995 , j. repond , _ ed .
_ , aip conf .
349 ( 1996 ) , p. 345 .
a. le yaouanc , l. oliver , and j .- c .
raynal , phys .
b * 292 * , 353 ( 1992 ) ; m. gronau and s. wakaizumi , phys . rev . lett . * 68 * , 1814 ( 1992 ) ; a. le yaouanc _ et al .
_ , lpthe - orsay/95 - 15 , hep - ph/9504270 ( 1995 ) .
d. husby _ et al .
_ , in _ proc .
5th int .
conf . on electronics for particle physics _
, g. j. blanar and r. l. sumner , _ eds .
_ , lecroy corp .
( 1995 ) ; w. selove , in _ proc .
workshop on b physics at hadron accelerators _ , c. s. mishra and p. mcbride , _ eds .
_ , fermilab - conf-93/267 ( 1993 ) , p. 617 ; r. isik _ et al . _ , u. of pa
. report upr-234e ( 1996 ) . | charm sensitivities increased two decades experiments reconstruct @xmath4 events @xmath5 factories compass facility could achieve @xmath6-event sensitivity designing experiment tevatron s c0 area @xmath7 charm decays during tevatron run ii 20002005 btev / c0 effort aims charm beauty physics on charm sensitivity proposed level charm physics spectroscopy lifetimes qcd tests new - reach cp _ violation flavor - changing neutral - current lepton - number - violating decays @xmath2 mixing if direct violation occurs in cabibbo - suppressed @xmath3 decays observable in btev / c0 experiment violation central particle physics mechanism(s responsible established leading candidate kobayashi - maskawa km ) model small size @xmath8 asymmetries small mixing between third quark generation first two large asymmetries expected beauty sector other models attribute effect exchange massive particles right - handed coupings extra higgs scalars asymmetries democratic too small observe in beauty models predict large mixing in charm know violation from mechanisms many contribute or other mechanismbalanced program investigation in quark lepton@xcite sectors desirable -violation mixing rare - decay studies in beauty goal projects studies charm important small standard model predictions allow new physics direct cp violation charm decay expected standard model at @xmath12 level@xcite significant for singly cabibbo - suppressed decays tree - level interfere with penguin diagrams leading partial - decay - rate asymmetries @xmath13 @xmath14 decay width @xmath3 meson final state @xmath15 @xmath16 cp_-conjugate process @xmath17 sources measurements predictions not cited in refs.@xcite.@xmath18 at 90% confidence level asymmetries reflect interference ckm phase phase differences final - state interactions experimental evidence suggests final - state effects in charm decay mode @xmath19 occurs branching ratio@xcite @xmath20 no spectator diagram two @xmath9-exchange diagrams cancel mode fed by rescattering @xmath21 into @xmath22 large final - state effects evident multibody charm decays dalitz - plot analyses reveal phase differencesobservations underlie @xmath10@xmath11 asymmetries charm additional mechanisms violation include @xmath8 mixing with glueballs gluonic hybrids @xmath8 mixing leads to asymmetries @xmath232re@xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 effect calibration for systematic effects measurement small asymmetries window into new @xmath3 s mixed with gluonic - hybrid states large -violating effects best limits on direct cp violation in cabibbo - suppressed charm decay from fermilab e687@xcite e791@xcite cleo@xcite fixed - target experiments production asymmetry @xmath3 vs. @xmath27 asymmetry cabibbo - suppressed mode normalized to cabibbo - favored mode sensitivity to trigger reconstruction particle - identification efficiency differences particles antiparticles e687 @xmath2310% sensitivity achieved establishment @xmath12 asymmetry requires @xmath2810@xmath29 reconstructed @xmath3 s @xmath3010@xmath31 reconstructed charged neutral @xmath3 s in scsd modesratiometric measurements insensitive to systematic effects sub-@xmath12 level attention required systematic uncertainties charm sector excellent for violation from physics beyond standard model top - quark loops absent low - background window for new physics new physics may couple differently to up down - type quarks quark mass large production cross sections allow larger event samples branching ratios to final states interest larger extensions standard model predict effects in charm direct violation in cabibbo - favored or cabibbo - suppressed modes signature for new physics asymmetries scsd modes could reach @xmath3010@xmath32 non - minimal supersymmetry left - right - symmetric models small new - physics contribution to dcsd rate could amplify-induced asymmetries to @xmath10@xmath33 authors emphasized possibility indirect violation in charm depends on charm mixing not established experimentally observation of wrong - sign signal mixing dcsd at cleo stimulated theorists to consider extensions sm @xmath35 @xmath36 display -violating mixinginclude flavor - changing higgs exchange fourth generation @xmath37-mediated fcnc s left - right symmetry supersymmetry quark - squark alignment leptoquarks effects likely @xmath38-to-@xmath7-charm experiment indirect asymmetry in @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 decays per@xmath42 reconstructed charm @xmath43 sensitivity final state eigenstate asymmetry independent phases measures new - phase btev / c0 experiment unprecedented reach charm physics tests qcd hqet meson baryon spectroscopy lifetimes charm production dalitz - plot analyses semileptonic form factors extraction ckm elements space restrictions preclude fig . 1 sketch btev / c0 spectrometer tevatron c0 collider interaction hall 1998 focuses on heavy - quark states forward direction @xmath440.3 decay - time resolution advantageous hadron identification apparatus high interaction - rate capability large acceptance efficient charm trigger high - speed - capacity data acquisition good mass vertex resolution particle identification challenging trigger particle identification trigger decay vertex separated primary vertexreduce occupancy vertex reconstruction trigger level 1 pixel detectors used efficient reliable compact particle identification build ring - imaging cherenkov counter spectrometer large - aperture fixed - target heavy - quark experiments charm sensitivity goal achieved collider or fixed - target mode tevatron run ii early running c0 fixed - target mode wire target beam halo estimated fixed - target reconstructed - event yield @xmath45 per @xmath6 seconds 1-mhz interaction rate higher production cross section greater collider mode reduced running time anticipate increasing interaction rate beyond 1mhz tevatron bunch separation reduced 396 to 132ns @xmath235 mhz feasible @xmath46 charm decays reconstructed fixed - target or collider mode better charm physics detailed question data taken forward charm - production cross section not measured @xmath47 collisions biases mixing studies @xmath48 cascade decays suppressed fixed - target reduced beauty production cross section hadroproduction experiment reconstructing @xmath46 charm events feasible detector trigger data acquisition technologies development observe direct violation charm decay extend discovery reach new physics goldengrinstein phys b 222 501 ( 1989 ) buccella phys 302 319 ( 1993 ) pugliese santorelli third workshop tau charm factory marbella spain 16 june 1993 frontieres 1994 ) p. 387 buccella phys 51 3478 ( 1995 ) buccella lusignoli pugliese b 249 ( 1996 ) burdman future high - sensitivity charm experiments d kaplan s kwan fermilab - conf-94/190 ( 1994 ) p. 75 workshop tau charm factory repond argonne national laboratory june 2123 1995 349 ( 1996 ) p. 409 frabetti phys . b 331 217 ( 1994 ) e wiss workshop tau charm factory argonne national laboratory june 2123 1995 repond conf 349 ( 1996 ) p. 345 le yaouanc l oliver raynal phys . b 292 353 ( 1992 ) gronau s wakaizumi phys . 68 1814 ( 1992 ) le yaouanclpthe - orsay/95 - 15 hep - ph/9504270 1995 husby 5th conf electronics particle physics g. j. blanar l. sumner lecroy corp 1995 selove workshop physics hadron accelerators c. s. mishra p. mcbride eds fermilab - conf-93/267 1993 p. 617 r isik u. of pa report upr-234e 1996 ) | 0.501881 | 3,189 | 1,634 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,746 | although there is ample work in the literature dealing with skewness in the multivariate setting , there is a relative paucity of work in the matrix variate paradigm .
such work is , for example , useful for modelling three - way data .
a matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution is derived based on a mean - variance matrix normal mixture .
an expectation - conditional maximization algorithm is developed for parameter estimation .
simulated data are used for illustration . +
* keywords * : matrix variate distribution ; skew-@xmath0 distribution | matrix variate distributions have proven to be useful for modelling three - way data , such as multivariate longitudinal data . however , in most cases , the underlying distribution has been elliptical such as the matrix variate normal and the matrix variate @xmath0 distributions .
however , there has been relatively little work done on matrix variate data that can account for skewness present in the data .
the work that has been carried out in the area of matrix variate skew distributions is mostly limited to the matrix variate skew - normal distribution .
herein , we derive a matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution .
the remainder of this paper is laid out as follows . in section 2 ,
some background is presented . in section 3 ,
the density of the matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution is derived and a parameter estimation procedure is given .
section 4 looks at some simulations , and we conclude with a summary and some future work ( section 5 ) .
one natural method to model three - way data is to use a matrix - variate distribution .
there are many examples in the literature of such distributions , the most well - known being the matrix - normal distribution . for notional clarity , we use @xmath1 to denote a realization of a random matrix @xmath2 .
an @xmath3 random matrix @xmath2 follows a matrix variate normal distribution with location parameter @xmath4 and scale matrices @xmath5 and @xmath6 of dimensions @xmath7 and @xmath8 , respectively .
we write @xmath9 to denote such a random matrix and the density of @xmath2 can be written @xmath10 one well known property of the matrix variate normal distribution @xcite is @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the multivariate normal density with dimension @xmath13 , @xmath14 is the vectorization of @xmath4 , and @xmath15 is the kronecker product .
although the matrix variate normal is arguably the most mathematically tractable , there are examples of non - normal cases .
one famous example is the wishart distribution @xcite arising as the distribution of the sample covariance matrix of a multivariate normal sample .
more recently , however , there has been some work done in the area of matrix skew distributions such as the matrix - variate skew normal distribution , e.g. , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite .
more information on matrix variate distributions can be found in @xcite .
very recently , there has also been work done in the area of finite mixtures .
specifically , @xcite looked at clustering and classification of multivariate longitudinal data using a mixture of matrix variate normal distributions .
also , @xcite , looked at mixtures of matrix variate @xmath0 distributions .
various multivariate distributions such as the multivariate @xmath0 , and skew-@xmath0 , the shifted asymmetric laplace distribution , and the generalized hyperbolic distributions arise as special cases of a normal variance - mean mixture ( cf . * ? ? ?
* ch . 6 ) . in this formulation ,
the density of a @xmath16-dimensional random vector @xmath1 takes the form @xmath17 which is equivalent to the representation @xmath18 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 is a latent random variable with density @xmath21 .
the multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution with @xmath22 degrees of freedom arises as a special case with @xmath23 , where @xmath24 denotes the inverse gamma distribution with density function @xmath25 a random variable @xmath26 has a generalized inverse gaussian ( gig ) distribution with parameters @xmath27 and @xmath28 if its density function can be written as @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the modified bessel function of the third kind with index @xmath28 . several functions of gig random variables have tractable expected values , e.g. , @xmath31
@xmath32 @xmath33 where @xmath34 , @xmath35 , and @xmath36 is the modified bessel function of the third kind with index @xmath28 .
these results will prove to be useful for parameter estimation for the matrix - variate skew-@xmath0 distribution .
we will say that an @xmath3 random matrix @xmath2 has a matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution , @xmath37 , if @xmath2 can be written @xmath38 where @xmath4 and @xmath39 are @xmath3 matrices , @xmath40 , and @xmath23 .
analogous to its multivariate counterpart , @xmath4 is a location matrix , @xmath39 is a skewness matrix , @xmath5 and @xmath6 are scale matrices , and @xmath22 is the degrees of freedom .
it then follows that @xmath41 and thus the joint density of @xmath2 and @xmath42 is @xmath43\right\ } , { \addtocounter{equation}{1}\tag{\theequation}}\label{eqn : joint}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath44 .
we note that the exponential term in can be written as @xmath45\right\},\ ] ] where @xmath46 therefore , the marginal density of @xmath2 is @xmath47\right\}dw.\end{aligned}\ ] ] making the change of variables given by @xmath48 we can write @xmath49\left[\delta({\mathbf{x}};{\mathbf{m}},{\mathbf\sigma},{\mathbf\psi})+\nu\right]}\right).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the density of @xmath2 , as derived here , is considered a matrix variate extension of the multivariate skew-@xmath0 density used by @xcite .
as discussed by @xcite and @xcite in the matrix variate normal case , the estimates of @xmath5 and @xmath6 are unique only up to a multiplicative constant .
indeed , if we let @xmath50 and @xmath51 , @xmath52 , the likelihood is unchanged .
this identifiability issue can be resolved , for example , by setting @xmath53 or @xmath54 .
note that @xmath55 , so the estimate of the kronecker product is unique . for the purposes of parameter estimation , note that the conditional density of @xmath42 is @xmath56^{\frac{\lambda}{2}}w^{\lambda-1}}{2k_{\lambda}(\sqrt{\rho({\mathbf{a}},{\mathbf\sigma},{\mathbf\psi})[\delta({\mathbf{x}};{\mathbf{m}},{\mathbf\sigma},{\mathbf\psi})+\nu}])}\exp\left\{-\frac{\rho({\mathbf{a}},{\mathbf\sigma},{\mathbf\psi})w+[{\delta({\mathbf{x}};{\mathbf{m}},{\mathbf\sigma},{\mathbf\psi})+\nu}]/{w}}{2}\right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] therefore , @xmath57 where @xmath58 .
finally , we note that @xmath59 where @xmath60 denotes the multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution with location parameter @xmath14 , skewness parameter @xmath61 , scale matrix @xmath62 , and @xmath22 degrees of freedom .
this can be easily seen from the representation given in and the property of the matrix normal distribution given in .
note that the normal variance - mean mixture representation as well as the relationship with the multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution present two convenient methods to generate random matrices from the matrix variate skew @xmath0 distribution .
the former is used in section 4 .
suppose we observe a sample of @xmath63 matrices @xmath64 from an @xmath3 matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution .
as with the multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution , we proceed as if the observed data is incomplete , and introduce the latent variables @xmath65 .
the complete - data log - likelihood is then @xmath66-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^nw_i{\,\mbox{tr}}({\mathbf\sigma}^{-1}{\mathbf{a}}{\mathbf\psi}^{-1}{\mathbf{a}}'),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath67 is constant with respect to the parameters .
we proceed by using an expectation - conditional maximization ( ecm ) algorithm @xcite described overleaf . *
1 ) initialization * : initialize the parameters @xmath68 .
set @xmath69 * 2 ) e step * : update @xmath70 , where @xmath71 where @xmath72[\delta({\mathbf{x}}_i;\hat{{\mathbf{m}}}^{(t)},\hat{{\mathbf\sigma}}^{(t)},\hat{{\mathbf\psi}}^{(t)})+\hat{\nu}^{(t)}]},\ ] ] and @xmath73 * 3 ) first cm step * : update the parameters @xmath74 .
@xmath75where @xmath76 and @xmath77 . the update for the degrees of freedom can not be obtained in closed form .
instead we solve for @xmath22 to obtain @xmath78 .
@xmath79 where @xmath80 is the digamma function . *
4 ) second cm step * : update @xmath5 @xmath81 \end{split}\ ] ] * 5 ) third cm step * : update @xmath6 @xmath82 \end{split}\ ] ] * 6 ) check convergence * : if not converged , set @xmath83 and return to step 2 .
note that there are several options for determining convergence of this ecm algorithm . in the simulations in section 4
, a criterion based on the aitken acceleration @xcite is used .
the aitken acceleration at iteration @xmath0 is @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the ( observed ) log - likelihood at iteration @xmath0 .
the quantity in can be used to derive an asymptotic estimate ( i.e. , an estimate of the value after very many iterations ) of the log - likelihood at iteration @xmath86 , i.e. , @xmath87 ( cf . * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
as in @xcite , we stop our em algorithms when @xmath88 , provided this difference is positive .
as discussed in @xcite and @xcite for parameter estimation in the matrix variate normal case , the estimates of @xmath5 and @xmath6 are unique only up to a multiplicative constant .
indeed , if we let @xmath50 and @xmath51 , @xmath52 , the likelihood is unchanged .
however , we notice that , @xmath55 , so the estimate of the kronecker product is unique .
we conduct two simulations to illustrate the estimation of the parameters . in both simulations ,
we take 50 different datasets of size 100 , from a @xmath89 matrix skew-@xmath0 distribution .
also , in both simulations , @xmath90 and @xmath91 . in simulation 1 , we took the location and skewness matrix to be @xmath92 and @xmath93 , respectively , and @xmath94 and @xmath95 in simulation 2 , where @xmath96 in figures [ fig : lineplots1 ] and [ fig : lineplots2 ] , we show line plots of the marginals for each column ( labelled v1 , v2 , v3 , v4 ) of a typical dataset from simulations 1 and 2 , respectively .
the dashed red lines denote the means . in figure [
fig : lineplots1 ] , the skewness in columns 1 , 2 , and 4 , for simulation 1 , is very prominent when visually compared to column 3 , which has zero skewness .
the skewness is also apparent in the lineplots for simulation 2 , however , because the values of the skewness are generally less than those for simulation 1 , it is not as prominent .
the component - wise means of the parameters as well as the component wise standard deviations are given in table [ tab : results ] .
we see that the estimates of the mean matrix and skewness matrix are very close to the true value for both simulations .
moreover , we see that the estimates of @xmath5 and @xmath6 also correspond approximately to the their true values , and thus so would the kronecker product , which is not shown .
[ tab : results ]
the density of a matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution was derived .
this distribution can be considered as a three - way extension of the multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution .
parameter estimation was carried out using an ecm algorithm . because the formulation of multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution this work is based on
is a special case of the generalized hyperbolic distribution , it is reasonable to postulate an extension to a broader class of matrix variate distributions .
ongoing work considers a finite mixture of matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distributions for clustering and classification of three - way data .
domnguez - molina , j. a. , g. gonzlez - faras , r. ramos - quiroga , and a. k. gupta ( 2007 ) .
a matrix variate closed skew - normal distribution with applications to stochastic frontier analysis . _
36_(9 ) , 16911703 .
lindsay , b. g. ( 1995 ) .
mixture models : theory , geometry and applications . in _ nsf - cbms regional conference series in probability and statistics _ ,
volume 5 .
california : institute of mathematical statistics : hayward . | matrix variate distributions useful for modelling three - way data most underlying distribution elliptical normal @xmath0 little work on matrix variate data for skewness work limited to skew - normal distribution derive matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution remainder of paper section 2 background section 3 density of skew-@xmath0 distribution derived parameter estimation procedure section 4 simulations with summary future work ( section 5 ) method to model three - way data matrix - variate distribution many examples known matrix - normal distribution use @xmath1 random matrix @xmath2 @xmath3 random matrix @xmath2 follows matrix variate normal distribution with location parameter @xmath4 scale matrices @xmath5 and @xmath6 of dimensions @xmath7 @xmath8 write @xmath9 random matrix density of @xmath2 written @xmath10 property of matrix variate normal distribution is @xmath11 @xmath12 is multivariate normal density with dimension @xmath13 @xmath14 vectorization of @xmath4 @xmath15 kronecker productmatrix variate normal tractable non - normal cases wishart distribution @xcite sample covariance matrix multivariate normal sample work matrix skew distributions skew normal distribution @xcite information in @xcite work finite mixtures @xcite clustering classification multivariate longitudinal data matrix variate normal distributions mixtures matrix variate @xmath0 distributions multivariate distributions @xmath0 skew-@xmath0 shifted asymmetric laplace distribution generalized hyperbolic distributions special cases of normal variance - mean mixture density of @xmath16-dimensional random vector @xmath1 form @xmath17 equivalent to representation @xmath18 @xmath19 latent random variable with density @xmath21 multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution with @xmath22 degrees freedom special case with @xmath23 @xmath24 inverse gamma distribution with density function @xmath25 random variable @xmath26 generalized inverse gaussian gig distribution with parameters @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 modified bessel function third kind index @xmath28 several functions of gig random variables have tractable expected values@xmath31 @xmath34 modified bessel function third kind index @xmath28 results useful for parameter estimation matrix - variate skew-@xmath0 distribution @xmath3 random matrix @xmath2 has matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution @xmath37 @xmath2 written @xmath38 @xmath4 @xmath39 are @xmath3 matrices @xmath40 @xmath23 @xmath4 location matrix @xmath39 skewness matrix @xmath5 @xmath6 scale matrices @xmath22 degrees of freedom @xmath41 joint density of @xmath2 @xmath42 is @xmath43\right @xmath44 exponential term written as @xmath45\right @xmath46 marginal density of @xmath2 is @xmath47\right change variables @xmath48 write @xmath49\left\delta({\mathbf{x}}{m}}\sigma}\psi} density of @xmath2 matrix variate extension of multivariate skew-@xmath0 density @xcite discussed by @xcite in matrix variate normal case estimates of @xmath5 and @xmath6 unique up to multiplicative constant if let @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 likelihood unchanged identifiability issue resolved by setting @xmath53 or @xmath54 @xmath55 estimate of kronecker product unique parameter estimation conditional density of @xmath42 is @xmath56^{\lambda}{2}}w\lambda-1}}{2k\lambda}\mathbf{a}}\sigma}{aligned @xmath57 where @xmath58 @xmath59 where @xmath60 denotes multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution with location parameter @xmath14 , skewness parameter @xmath61 scale matrix @xmath62 @xmath22 degrees of freedom seen from representation property of matrix normal distributionnormal variance - mean mixture representation relationship with multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution present methods to generate random matrices from skew @xmath0 distribution former used in section 4 observe sample of @xmath63 matrices @xmath64 from @xmath3 matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution proceed if data incomplete introduce latent variables @xmath65 complete - data log - likelihood is @xmath66-\frac{1}\mathbf\sigma\mathbf\psi @xmath67 is constant parameters proceed expectation - conditional maximization algorithm initialization initialize parameters @xmath68 set @xmath69 update @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72\delta\mathbf @xmath73 update parameters @xmath74 @xmath75where @xmath76 @xmath77 update for degrees of freedom obtained in closed form solve for @xmath22 to obtain @xmath78 . @xmath79 @xmath80 is digamma function4 second step update @xmath5 @xmath81 5 third step update @xmath6 @xmath82 check convergence if not converged set @xmath83 return to step 2 several options for determining convergence ecm algorithm simulations section 4 criterion based on aitken acceleration @xcite used acceleration at iteration @xmath0 is @xmath84 @xmath85 is log - likelihood at iteration @xmath0 quantity used derive asymptotic estimate value after many iterations of log - likelihood at iteration @xmath86 @xmath87 stop algorithms when @xmath88 difference positive parameter estimation matrix variate normal case estimates of @xmath5 @xmath6 unique up to multiplicative constant @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 likelihood unchanged @xmath55 estimate of kronecker product unique two simulations illustrate estimation parameters take 50 datasets size 100 from @xmath89 matrix skew-@xmath0 distribution @xmath90 and @xmath91simulation 1 took location skewness matrix @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath95 simulation 2 @xmath96 figures lineplots1 lineplots2 show line plots marginals each column v1 v2 v3 v4 typical dataset simulations 1 2 dashed red lines denote means figure lineplots1 skewness in columns 1 2 4 simulation 1 prominent compared to column 3 zero skewness skewness apparent lineplots simulation 2 values skewness less 1 not prominent component - wise means parameters component wise standard deviations in table [ tab results ] estimates mean matrix skewness matrix close to true value for both simulations estimates of @xmath5 @xmath6 correspond to true values kronecker product not shown density of matrix variate skew-@xmath0 distribution derived distribution three - way extension of multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution parameter estimation using ecm algorithm formulation multivariate skew-@xmath0 distribution special case generalized hyperbolic distribution postulate extension to broader class matrix variate distributionsconsiders matrix variate skew- distributions clustering classification three - way data domnguez - molina gupta 2007 matrix variate skew - normal distribution applications stochastic frontier analysis 36_(9 ) 16911703 lindsay 1995 mixture models theory geometry applications nsf - cbms regional conference series probability statistics volume 5 california institute mathematical statistics hayward | 0.496193 | 3,062 | 1,558 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,754 | anderson et al have shown that for complex energies , the classical trajectories of _ real _ quartic potentials are closed and periodic only on a discrete set of eigencurves .
moreover , recently it was revealed that , when time is complex @xmath0 @xmath1 certain real hermitian systems possess close periodic trajectories only for a discrete set of values of @xmath2 . on the other hand
it is generally true that even for real energies , classical trajectories of non @xmath3- symmetric hamiltonians with complex parameters are mostly non - periodic and open . in this paper
we show that for given real energy , the classical trajectories of _ complex _ quartic hamiltonians @xmath4 , ( where @xmath5 is real , @xmath6 is complex and @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 ) are closed and periodic only for a discrete set of parameter curves in the complex @xmath6-plane .
it was further found that given complex parameter @xmath6 , the classical trajectories are periodic for a discrete set of real energies ( i.e. classical energy get discretized or quantized by imposing the condition that trajectories are periodic and closed ) .
moreover , we show that for real and positive energies ( continuous ) , the classical trajectories of _ complex _ hamiltonian @xmath10 ( @xmath11 are periodic when @xmath12 $ ] for @xmath13 @xmath14 and @xmath15 .
= 1 | in recent years , classical behavior of non - hermitian hamiltonian systems@xcite as well as classical motion of hermitian systems for complex energies@xcite have attracted much interest .
investigation of classical mechanics in the complex domain is useful for understanding various classical and quantum mechanical phenomena such as barrier tunneling , dynamical tunneling@xcite , classical and quantum chaos@xcite , quantum correspondence principle , complex forms of uncertainty relations and the semiclassical limit of complex quantum field theories . since the earlier work on classical motion of non - hermitian systems @xcite , there have been several interesting results found on the various aspects of the subject@xcite .
numerical and analytical investigations have revealed that when energies are real , classical trajectories of complex @xmath3-symmetric non hermitian systems are closed and periodic . however , when energies of these systems are complex , the periodic trajectories usually become non periodic and open@xcite .
recently it was shown that even though most of the trajectories corresponding to complex energies are open and non periodic , for some systems , there are special discrete sets of curves in the complex - energy plane for which the trajectories are periodic@xcite . on the other hand , in non - hermitian and
non @xmath3-symmetric hamiltonian systems , even for real energies , almost all trajectories except a few are non - periodic and open .
it was also shown recently that when time is taken as a complex quantity with a specific fixed phase angle or as a specific complex function , non periodic trajectories of 1-d hamiltonian systems become periodic and closed@xcite . in this paper
we investigate the classical trajectories from a different point of view . here
we examine clasical behavior of the complex hamiltonian @xmath4 , ( where @xmath7 , @xmath9 , and @xmath5 is real such that @xmath16 is not @xmath3-symmetric ) for complex parameter @xmath6 and real energy @xmath17 .
outline of the paper is as follows . in the section [ sec:2 ] , analytic expressions for complex trajectories
are derived.expressions for periods of the periodic trajectories as well as time taken by unbounded trajectories to escape to infinity are found in terms of @xmath6 and energy @xmath17 .
we will show that for given real energy , the classical trajectories of the above quartic hamiltonian are open except for a discrete set of parameter values in the complex @xmath6-plane .
in section [ sec:3 ] we study how trajectories behave when energy is real and @xmath6 is a fixed complex parameter .
the classical trajectories of complex hamiltonian @xmath10 ( @xmath18 is investigated for real energies in section [ sec:4 ] and concluding remarks are given in section [ sec:5 ] .
in this section first we study in detail the classical motion of the complex quartic anharmonic oscillator .
we assume that the hamiltonian has the form @xmath19where @xmath5 is a real positive constant , @xmath6 is a complex constant and @xmath7 or @xmath9 .
first we derive expressions for @xmath20 and the period for the above hamiltonian .
when it is needed , value of @xmath21 is chosen as @xmath22 or @xmath9 . throughout this paper mass of the particle
is taken as half @xmath23 the equation of motion is @xmath24 the turning points of this system are taken as @xmath25 and @xmath26 and by integrating equation([eq:2])we have @xmath27where @xmath28 is the constant of integration which depends on initial conditions .
the left - hand side of the above equation is an elliptic integral of the first kind and hence equation ( [ eq:3 ] ) becomes @xmath29 , \frac{\left ( x_{1}-x_{2}\right ) ( x_{0}-x_{3})}{\left ( x_{0}-x_{2}\right ) ( x_{1}-x_{3})}\right)\ ] ] @xmath30 where @xmath31 is an elliptic function .
we invert the above equation in terms of jacobian elliptic function ` @xmath32 ' as @xmath33where @xmath34 and modulus @xmath35 ^{1/2}$ ] and @xmath36 is an arbitrary constant which is determined by the initial conditions .
note that @xmath20 in the above equation is still a solution of ( [ eq:3 ] ) , when @xmath25 and @xmath37 are cyclically changed ( e.g. @xmath38 ) . in order to understand how the trajectories behave ,
we need to recognize the periodic , bounded and unbounded properties of the function @xmath39 .
first we find complementary modulus @xmath40 and complete elliptic functions @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
they are defined by @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath41 and @xmath42 are evaluated directly from the above equations and they are independent of phase angle @xmath46 .
the trajectory @xmath20 is given by @xmath47 the condition of trajectory become unbounded and the particle escapes to infinity is @xmath48 where @xmath49 satisfied for some real positive @xmath0 and the time taken for the particle to escape to @xmath50 is give by @xmath51 where @xmath52 ` @xmath32 ' is doubly periodic with period @xmath53 where @xmath54 and @xmath14 are integers .
therefore the condition for the trajectory to become periodic and particle does not escape to infinity is @xmath55 and @xmath56 then the trajectory is periodic with the period .
@xmath57 note that if @xmath58 the trajectory is still nonperiodic . by imposing the condition that im@xmath59
, we have @xmath60}{im\left [ k^{\prime } /z\right ] } ; \ \ \ \ m,\ n\ \epsilon \
\mathbb{z } \label{eq:13}\ ] ] where @xmath61 since @xmath14 and @xmath54 are integers and the energy @xmath17 is fixed , @xmath62 is rational and the equation ( 13 ) provides a discrete set of parameter values in the complex @xmath6 plane for which classical trajectories are periodic .
let @xmath63 figures [ fig1]a and [ fig1]b show how the ratio @xmath62 varies with discrete values of @xmath46 for the cases @xmath7 and @xmath64 respectively .
without loss of generality , the energy @xmath17 is taken as unity as it is real .
the results can be generalized for any real energy @xmath17 by simple rescaling of @xmath65 and @xmath0 .
next we consider the case when parameter @xmath6 is a fixed complex number and @xmath66 is a variable ( assume @xmath67 and @xmath68 ) . as a result ,
the equation ( [ eq:13 ] ) allows only a discrete set of values of @xmath17 for which trajectories are periodic .
it was found that these discrete values of @xmath17 can be either real or complex satisfying the condition ( [ eq:13 ] ) .
table [ tab : table_1 ] and table [ tab : table_2 ] show some real discrete values of @xmath17 which make trajectories periodic when @xmath7 and @xmath64 respectively .
figures [ p_1 ] and [ p_2 ] show the periodic trajectories of systems @xmath7 and @xmath64 for two values of real energies .
moreover , it was found that if energy @xmath17 is corresponding to the periodic trajectories of @xmath69 then @xmath70 will be the energy which makes trajectories of @xmath71 ( @xmath72 is the complex conjugate of @xmath6 ) periodic .
further @xmath17 and @xmath70 are solutions corresponding to the same @xmath14 and @xmath54 in the periodic condition ( [ eq:13 ] ) for these two hamiltonians respectively . in other words
if @xmath73 is the discrete set of energies for which classical trajectories of @xmath74 are periodic then @xmath75 is the set of energies for which trajectories of @xmath71 are periodic .
figures [ p_3]a and [ p_3]b show two periodic trajectories illustrating the above claim .
. classical energy spectrum corresponding to periodic trajectories of @xmath76 for various @xmath77 [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ]
next we assume that @xmath79 and @xmath80 in the hamiltonian ( [ eq:1 ] ) . then new hamiltonian has the form @xmath81 where @xmath82 is complex and @xmath83 .
the equation of motion is @xmath84where @xmath17 is the total energy .
following the same procedure as in section [ sec:2 ] , we obtain required equations . by integrating ( [ eq:15 ] )
we have @xmath85where @xmath28 is the constant of integration which depends on initial conditions .
the left - hand side of the above equation is an elliptic integral of the first kind and hence equation ( [ eq:16 ] ) becomes @xmath86 , -1\right ) { \small = 2}\left ( \mu e\right ) ^{1/4}{\small t+\alpha } \label{eq:17}\ ] ] where @xmath87 and @xmath31 is an elliptic function .
we invert the above equation in terms of jacobian elliptic function ` @xmath32 ' as @xmath88 note that modulus @xmath89 for the above problem . @xmath41 and
@xmath42 are defined in ( [ eq:7 ] ) and ( [ eq:8 ] ) and @xmath90 then @xmath41 and @xmath42 are obtained as @xmath91 @xmath92 as in the previous sections the condition of trajectory become periodic and particle does not escape to infinity is @xmath93 then the trajectory is periodic with the period @xmath94 since @xmath83 @xmath95 \left ( \cos \left ( \theta /4\right ) -i\sin \left ( \theta /4\right ) \right ) .
\label{eq:24}\ ] ] @xmath96 .
\label{eq:25}\ ] ] since @xmath41 is real and @xmath17 is real and positive , by imposing the condition that im@xmath59 , we have @xmath97 or @xmath98 ; \ \ \ \ m,\ n\ \epsilon \ \mathbb{z } . \label{eq:27}\ ] ] when @xmath99 and @xmath100 , @xmath101 and it is hermitian .
then @xmath16 possesses periodic trajectories and the period @xmath102 becomes @xmath103 but the period is corresponding to the minimum non zero @xmath104and the resulting period is @xmath105 on the other hand when @xmath106 and @xmath107 , @xmath108 and it is the non - hermitian ` wrong sign ' potential which also possesses periodic trajectories .
the period is @xmath109 it is evident from equations ( 29 ) and ( 30 ) that the hamiltonians @xmath110 and @xmath111 have the same classical period ( i.e. @xmath112 ) .
note that these two hamiltonians are the classical limit of the quantum mechanical isospectral hamiltonians as shown in @xcite .
in this paper we have presented three main results .
the first is that , for given real energy , the classical trajectories of quartic hamiltonians @xmath4 , ( where @xmath5 is real , @xmath6 is complex , and @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath113 ) are closed and periodic only for a discrete set of parameter curves in the complex @xmath6-plane .
the second result is that given complex parameter @xmath6 , the classical trajectories are found to be periodic only for a discrete set of real energies . as a result ,
real classical energies get discretized or quantized by the condition that trajectories are periodic and closed .
this result is analogous to what was obtained by anderson et al in @xcite for real potential parameters with complex @xmath17 ( here it is for complex potential parameters with real energies ) .
further we showed that if @xmath114 is the discrete set of energies for which classical trajectories of @xmath69 are periodic then @xmath115 is the set of energies for which trajectories of @xmath71 are periodic .
we presented our results with illustrations .
it is important to note that when @xmath6 is complex and not pure imaginary , the entire quantum eigen spectrum corresponding to the hamiltonian @xmath16 is complex and eigenenergies do not come as complex conjugate pairs . therefore @xmath16 can not be pseudo hermitian and can not have any antilinear symmetry . as the third result
, we showed that for real energies , the classical trajectories of complex hamiltonian @xmath10 ( @xmath18 are periodic only for discrete values of @xmath46 satisfying the condition @xmath116 $ ] for @xmath14 and @xmath15 . further it was found that hamiltonians @xmath117
@xmath118 and @xmath111 which are the classical limit of the quantum mechanical isospectral hamiltonians introduced in @xcite , have the same classical period .
c. m. bender and s. boettcher , phys . rev . lett .
80 , 5243 ( 1998 ) . | classical behavior non - hermitian hamiltonian systems motion hermitian systems for complex energies attracted interest investigation classical mechanics complex domain useful understanding quantum mechanical phenomena barrier tunneling dynamical tunneling quantum chaos quantum correspondence principle complex uncertainty relations semiclassical limit complex quantum field theories earlier work classical motion non - hermitian systems interesting results aspects subject investigations revealed energies real classical trajectories of complex @xmath3-symmetric non hermitian systems closed periodic energies complex periodic trajectories become non periodic open complex energies open non periodic some special discrete curves in complex - energy plane trajectories periodic in non - hermitian non @xmath3-symmetric hamiltonian systems real energies almost all trajectories except few non - periodic open when time complex quantity specific fixed phase angle non periodic trajectories of hamiltonian systems become periodic closed paper classical trajectories different examine behavior complex hamiltonian @xmath4 real @xmath16 not @xmath3-symmetric for complex parameter @xmath6 real energy @xmath17 outline papersection sec:2 analytic expressions complex trajectories derived periods time unbounded trajectories escape infinity @xmath6 energy @xmath17 real energy classical trajectories quartic hamiltonian open except parameter values complex @xmath6-plane section sec:3 study trajectories energy real @xmath6 fixed complex parameter classical trajectories complex hamiltonian @xmath10 @xmath18 investigated real energies section sec:4 concluding remarks section sec:5 ] study classical motion complex quartic anharmonic oscillator hamiltonian form @xmath19where @xmath5 real positive constant @xmath6 complex constant @xmath7 @xmath9 derive expressions @xmath20 period hamiltonian value @xmath21 chosen as @xmath22 or @xmath9 mass particle half @xmath23 equation motion @xmath24 turning points @xmath25 @xmath26 integrating equation @xmath27where @xmath28 constant integration depends initial conditionsleft - side equation elliptic integral equation eq:3 becomes @xmath29 x{1-x_{2} x{0-x_{3} @xmath30 @xmath31 elliptic function invert equation jacobian elliptic function @xmath32 as @xmath33where @xmath34 modulus @xmath35 @xmath36 arbitrary constant determined by initial conditions @xmath20 solution eq:3 ] @xmath25 @xmath37 cyclically changed @xmath38 understand trajectories recognize periodic bounded unbounded properties function @xmath39 complementary modulus @xmath40 elliptic functions @xmath41 @xmath42 defined by @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath41 evaluated from equations independent of phase angle @xmath46 trajectory @xmath20 by @xmath47 condition trajectory unbounded particle escapes to infinity @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath0 time particle escape @xmath50 by @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath32 doubly periodic period @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath14 integerscondition for trajectory periodic particle escape infinity is @xmath55 @xmath56 trajectory periodic with period @xmath57 @xmath58 trajectory nonperiodic imposing condition@xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath14 @xmath54 integers energy @xmath17 fixed @xmath62 rational equation 13 ) provides discrete parameter values in complex @xmath6 plane trajectories periodic @xmath63 figures fig1]a fig1]b show ratio @xmath62 varies with discrete values @xmath46 for cases @xmath7 @xmath64 energy @xmath17 taken as unity real results generalized for real energy @xmath17 by rescaling @xmath65 and @xmath0 case parameter @xmath6 fixed complex number @xmath66 variable @xmath67 @xmath68 equation eq:13 allows discrete set values of @xmath17 trajectories periodic discrete values @xmath17 be real or complex condition eq:13 table show real discrete values of @xmath17 trajectories periodic when @xmath7 and @xmath64 figures p_1_2 show periodic trajectories of systems @xmath7 and @xmath64 for two real energiesfound energy @xmath17 to trajectories @xmath69 @xmath70 energy trajectories @xmath71 @xmath72 complex conjugate of @xmath6 ) periodic @xmath17 and @xmath70 solutions @xmath14 and @xmath54 in periodic condition eq:13 for two hamiltonians if @xmath73 trajectories @xmath74 periodic @xmath75 trajectories @xmath71 periodic figures p_3]a and p_3]b show two periodic trajectories energy spectrum to trajectories @xmath76 for @xmath77 assume @xmath79 and @xmath80 in hamiltonian eq:1 new hamiltonian form @xmath81 where @xmath82 complex @xmath83 equation of motion is @xmath84where @xmath17 is total energy procedure obtain required equations integrating eq:15 ) @xmath85where @xmath28 constant of integration depends on initial conditions left - hand side equation elliptic integral first kind equation ( eq:16 ) becomes @xmath86 where @xmath87 and @xmath31 elliptic function invert equation jacobian elliptic function @xmath32 as @xmath88 modulus @xmath89 problem @xmath41 @xmath42 defined in [ eq:7 eq:8 ] ) @xmath90 @xmath41 @xmath42 obtained as @xmath91 @xmath92 trajectory periodic particle escape infinity @xmath93 trajectory periodic period @xmath94 @xmath83 @xmath95{eq:24} @xmath96 @xmath41 real @xmath17 real positive imposing condition im@xmath59 @xmath97 or @xmath98{eq:27} @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 hermitian @xmath16 periodic trajectories period @xmath102 becomes @xmath103 period to minimum non zero @xmath104and resulting period @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 non - hermitian wrong sign potential periodic trajectories period is @xmath109 equations ( 29 ) 30 ) hamiltonians @xmath110 @xmath111 have same classical period @xmath112 ) hamiltonians classical limit of quantum mechanical isospectral hamiltonians in @xcite paper presented three results first real energy classical trajectories of quartic hamiltonians @xmath4 @xmath5 closed periodic for discrete parameter curves in complex @xmath6-plane second result complex parameter @xmath6 classical trajectories periodic for discrete real energies real classical energies discretized trajectories periodic closed analogous to anderson et al in @xcite for real potential parameters with complex @xmath17 @xmath114 discrete energies classical trajectories @xmath69 periodic @xmath115 trajectories @xmath71 periodic presented results illustrations @xmath6 complex entire quantum eigen spectrum hamiltonian @xmath16 complex complex conjugate pairs @xmath16 not be pseudo hermitian antilinear symmetry third result real energies classical trajectories of complex hamiltonian @xmath10 @xmath18 periodic for discrete values of @xmath46 satisfying condition @xmath116 @xmath14 @xmath15 hamiltonians @xmath117 @xmath118 @xmath111 classical limit of quantum mechanical isospectral hamiltonians @xcite have same classical period m. bender s. boettcher , phys . rev . lett80 1998 | 0.496868 | 2,986 | 1,576 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,755 | we present a new approach for calculating the nuclear equation of state and compressibility for finite nuclei using the density - constrained hartree - fock method .
= 10000 = 10000 = 10000 | the study of the nuclear equation of state ( eos ) and the behavior of nuclear matter under extreme conditions is crucial to our understanding of many nuclear and astrophysical phenomena . with the increasing availability of radioactive ion - beams @xcite the study of structure and reactions of exotic nuclei
are now possible , thus providing information concerning the isospin dependence of asymmetric nuclear matter @xcite .
recently , the study of the symmetry energy for such systems has been an active area of interest @xcite .
most studies of the eos involve infinite or semi - infinite nuclear matter and examine the dependence of the eos on the parametrizations of the effective interaction as well as its relation to the macroscopic and macroscopic - microscopic models of nuclear matter @xcite . for finite nuclei
the eos near the equilibrium density can be investigated via collective observables such as the isoscalar monopole vibrations ( breathing mode ) @xcite .
in addition , there are empirical methods relating the compressibility of finite nuclei to that of infinite nuclear matter @xcite .
however , the behavior of the eos for finite nuclei far from the equilibrium density is poorly known . in this manuscript
we introduce a new method for calculating the zero temperature eos and related quantities for finite nuclei within the mean - field description of nuclear properties . in section [ sec : theory ] we outline the general formalism for our calculations .
section [ sec : results ] discusses the application of the formalism to a sample set of nuclei and the results obtained .
the paper is concluded with a summary in section [ sec : summary ] .
in order to study finite nuclei away from their ground state equilibrium we take advantage of the density constrained hartree - fock ( dchf ) method @xcite .
the _ density constraint _ is a novel numerical method that was developed in the mid 1980 s and was used to provide a microscopic description of the formation of shape resonances in light systems @xcite .
recently , we have used the same method to calculate heavy - ion interaction potentials from the tdhf time - evolution of nuclear collisions @xcite . in the traditional constrained hartree - fock ( chf )
notation , density constraint corresponds to the replacement @xmath0 the numerical procedure for implementing this constraint and the method for steering the solution towards a specified @xmath1 is discussed in refs .
the convergence property is as good if not better than the traditional chf calculations with a constraint on a single collective degree of freedom . in practice
, we have obtained accurate densities for spherical nuclei using a radial hartree - fock program .
this density was then fitted to a parametric function of the form @xmath2 where @xmath3 denote the parameters to be fitted to reproduce a particular density profile . in all cases
the resulting non - linear fits were indistinguishable from the fitted density .
subsequently , the constraining density was obtained via a scale transformation of the above density profile @xmath4 followed by a renormalization to produce the correct mass number for the nucleus under study .
this scaling results in the compression of the bulk and stretching of the surface @xcite .
naturally , the minimum of all eos curves occur at the unconstrained hartree - fock minimum corresponding to @xmath5 .
the value of the scale @xmath6 was generally limited to the range @xmath7 . in fig .
[ fig : density ] we show the change in the density for various values of the scaling parameter @xmath6 in the case of the @xmath8ca nucleus . as the primary interaction
we have used the skyrme sly4 force @xcite , with and without the coulomb term , and including all of the spin - dependent terms .
we have performed the calculations using our new hartree - fock program discussed in ref .
@xcite .
in dealing with a finite nucleus we have faced a conceptual problem of deciding what density value to use for plotting the density dependence of the eos . unless otherwise stated we have used the _ central density _ as the reference density value for each value of the scaling parameter @xmath6 .
alternatively , one can choose the nuclear matter equilibrium density , 0.16 @xmath9 , as the reference density from the density profile .
the calculated values for incompressibility is slightly dependent on the choice of the reference density point due to the structure in the density profile .
our calculations show that this is about 10% or less and becomes negligible for heavy systems
. one disadvantage of using the central density as the reference value is that the equilibrium densities for different nuclei do not occur at the same value , thus making the calculation of the symmetry energy , which is essentially taking the difference of two eos curves along an isotope chain , erroneous .
for this reason , in the calculation of the symmetry energy we have used the density value 0.16 @xmath9 as the equilibrium density .
( color online ) scaled density obtained for the @xmath8ca nucleus for various values of the scaling parameter @xmath6 .
the inset shows the same quantity on a logarithmic scale . the force used was sly4 without the coulomb contribution . ] in order to extract the incompressibility coefficient , @xmath10 , we have expanded the eos ( binding energy per particle as a function of density ) around the equilibrium density @xmath11 using the expression @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the binding energy at the equilibrium density , and @xmath10 is the incompressibility coefficient @xmath14 we found in practice that this expression provides an excellent fit except at the extreme values of the density . to fit the entire curve perfectly a small linear contribution as well as a cubic term
could be included .
the results for the incompressibility is approximately 5%-10% higher if the full curve is used in the fit . finally , to extract the symmetry energy we use the expression @xmath15 where the isospin asymmetry parameter is defined as @xmath16 .
the @xmath17 dependence of the symmetry energy is generally acknowledged to be @xmath18 where the higher order terms in @xmath17 are assumed to be small .
traditionally , the symmetry energy can also be expanded around the equilibrium density as @xmath19 where we have defined the quantities @xmath20 and @xmath21 , which are related to the symmetry pressure and symmetry compressibility @xmath22
using our approach we have first investigated the eos for the @xmath23o nucleus , with two forces , sly4 and skm@xmath24 @xcite , without the coulomb interaction .
we found very little difference between the two forces as expected since most modern skyrme forces have similar nuclear matter incompressibility values .
for the incompressibility we find @xmath25 mev .
( color online ) eos for the @xmath26ca , @xmath8ca , and @xmath27ca nuclei as a function of density .
please see the comments in the manuscript regarding the density values . the force used was sly4 without the coulomb contribution . ]
we have then repeated the same two force study for the @xmath26ca nucleus , yielding an incompressibility of @xmath28 mev . in order to investigate the behavior of neutron rich systems
we have performed calculations for @xmath8ca and @xmath27ca systems . in fig .
[ fig : ca1 ] we show the eos for all of these ca nuclei without the coulomb force .
again , we stress that the density scale shown in fig . [
fig : ca1 ] is determined by choosing the central density in the density profile of each nucleus .
consequently , the equilibrium value for the eos is different for each nucleus . as we can see from fig .
[ fig : ca1 ] , the @xmath26ca and @xmath8ca systems have a very similar eos behavior , the primary difference being the energy shift due to the difference in the two binding energies .
the calculated incompressibility of @xmath8ca is @xmath29 mev , only slightly higher than the one for @xmath26ca .
however , the situation for @xmath27ca is significantly different , in addition to the large shift in the energy scale the incompressibility decreases to a value of @xmath30 mev , indicating a somewhat softer nucleus .
the values for the incompressibility obtained here , perhaps with the exception of the @xmath27ca system , are in general agreement with those given in ref .
@xcite .
we have repeated some of the calculations by including the coulomb interaction as well . in general ,
eos curves are shifted up due to the decrease in the binding energy per nucleon .
in addition , we see a small decrease in the incompressibility modulus . for @xmath26ca we find @xmath31 mev .
the incompressibility for @xmath8ca decreases to @xmath32 mev , and this value drops down to @xmath33 mev for @xmath27ca .
( color online ) the quantity @xmath34 for the @xmath8ca and @xmath27ca nuclei as a function of density . ]
we have also investigated the symmetry energy obtained from eq .
[ eq : symmetry1 ] , which is essentially the difference between the curves shown in fig .
[ fig : ca1 ] . the results for the quantity @xmath34 defined in eq .
[ eq : symmetry2 ] , corresponding to nuclei @xmath8ca and @xmath27ca having @xmath17 values of 0.16667 and 0.33334 , respectively , are shown in fig .
[ fig : sym1 ] . as we observe again
, the two systems behave very differently .
unlike infinite nuclear matter the curves do not cross at the equilibrium density since the binding energy per nucleon is different for different nuclei .
the values of @xmath35 around the equilibrium density are about 10 - 14 mev , which is considerably lower than the estimated range for nuclear matter value of 32 mev for the sly4 force . using the results of fig .
[ fig : sym1 ] we have extracted the quantities @xmath20 and @xmath21 for @xmath8ca and @xmath27ca .
the results show a very large variation between the two systems . for @xmath8ca
we find 66.6 mev and -403 mev for @xmath20 and @xmath21 , while for @xmath27ca these numbers become 1.55 mev and -193 mev , respectively .
we have introduced a new method for calculating the nuclear eos for finite nuclei including all of the terms in the nuclear effective interaction .
the calculated values agree well with known values obtained by other means , such as those deduced from experimental giant monopole resonances .
much work has gone into understanding the effects of various components of the effective interaction which vanish or become very small in the infinite nuclear matter limit . with the increased availability of new radioactive neutron and proton rich nuclei
the study of eos and symmetry energy along isotope chains of finite nuclei have become more urgent .
we believe that the density constrained hf method is a step in this direction . | study nuclear equation of state behavior nuclear matter under extreme conditions crucial to understanding nuclear astrophysical phenomena increasing availability radioactive ion - beams study structure reactions of exotic nuclei possible information isospin dependence of asymmetric nuclear matter study symmetry energy for systems active studies eos involve infinite semi - infinite nuclear matter examine dependence on parametrizations effective interaction relation to macroscopic microscopic models nuclear matter for finite nuclei eos near equilibrium density investigated via observables isoscalar monopole vibrations empirical methods relating compressibility of finite nuclei to infinite nuclear matter behavior eos for finite nuclei far from equilibrium density poorly known new method for calculating zero temperature eos related quantities for finite nuclei mean - field description nuclear properties section theory general formalism for calculations results application formalism to sample set nuclei results concluded summary study finite nuclei away from equilibrium density constrained hartree - fock method novel numerical method developed mid 1980 s microscopic description formation of shape resonances in light systemsused method calculate heavy - ion interaction potentials nuclear collisions traditional constrained hartree - fock notation density constraint corresponds replacement @xmath0 procedure implementing steering solution towards @xmath1 discussed in refs convergence property good better than traditional chf calculations constraint single degree freedom obtained accurate densities for spherical nuclei using radial hartree - fock program density fitted to parametric function @xmath2 @xmath3 parameters density non - linear fits indistinguishable from fitted density constraining density obtained via scale transformation density profile @xmath4 renormalization correct mass number nucleus scaling results in compression bulk stretching surface @xcite minimum eos curves occur at unconstrained hartree - fock minimum @xmath5 value scale @xmath6 limited to range @xmath7 fig . change density for values scaling parameter @xmath6 @xmath8ca nucleus primary interaction used skyrme sly4 force @xcite coulomb term spin - dependent terms performed calculations using new hartree - fock programfinite nucleus problem deciding density value for plotting density dependence eos used central density as reference for each value scaling parameter @xmath6 alternatively choose nuclear matter equilibrium density 0.16 @xmath9 as reference calculated values incompressibility dependent on reference density point structure profile calculations show about 10% or less negligible for heavy systems disadvantage central density equilibrium densities for different nuclei occur same value calculation symmetry energy erroneous used density value 0.16 @xmath9 as equilibrium density scaled density obtained for @xmath8ca nucleus for various values scaling parameter @xmath6 inset shows same quantity on logarithmic scale force used was sly4 without coulomb contribution extract incompressibility coefficient @xmath10 expanded eos binding energy density around equilibrium density @xmath11 using expression @xmath12 where @xmath13 is binding energy equilibrium density @xmath10 incompressibility coefficient expression provides excellent fit except at extreme values density to fit curve small linear contribution cubic term could be includedresults incompressibility 5%-10% higher if full curve used fit extract symmetry energy use expression @xmath15 isospin asymmetry parameter defined as @xmath16 @xmath17 dependence symmetry energy @xmath18 higher order terms in @xmath17 assumed small symmetry energy expanded around equilibrium density as @xmath19 defined quantities @xmath20 @xmath21 related to symmetry pressure symmetry compressibility @xmath22 investigated eos for @xmath23o nucleus with two forces sly4 skm@xmath24 @xcite without coulomb interaction found little difference forces nuclear incompressibility values incompressibility @xmath25 mev eos for @xmath26ca @xmath8ca @xmath27ca nuclei function of density force used sly4 without coulomb contribution repeated force study for @xmath26ca nucleus incompressibility of @xmath28 mev investigate behavior neutron rich systems calculations for @xmath8ca @xmath27ca systems fig . ca1 eos for nuclei without coulomb force density scale determined by central density each nucleus equilibrium value for eos different each nucleusfig . @xmath26ca and @xmath8ca systems similar eos behavior primary difference energy shift due to difference binding energies calculated incompressibility of @xmath8ca is @xmath29 mev slightly higher than @xmath26ca @xmath27ca different large shift energy incompressibility decreases to @xmath30 mev softer nucleus values incompressibility agreement with ref . @xcite repeated calculations coulomb interaction eos curves shifted up due to decrease binding energy per nucleon small decrease in incompressibility modulus for @xmath26ca @xmath31 mev . incompressibility @xmath8ca decreases to @xmath32 mev drops to @xmath33 mev for @xmath27ca quantity @xmath34 for @xmath8ca @xmath27ca nuclei function of density investigated symmetry energy difference between curves in fig . ca1 results for quantity @xmath34 defined in to nuclei @xmath8ca and @xmath27ca @xmath17 values of 0.16667 and 0.33334 shown in fig . two systems behave differentlyinfinite nuclear matter curves cross at equilibrium density binding energy per nucleon different nuclei values @xmath35 around equilibrium density 10 - 14 mev lower than estimated nuclear matter value 32 mev for sly4 force results fig extracted quantities @xmath20 @xmath21 results show large variation systems @xmath8ca 66.6 mev -403 mev for @xmath27ca 1.55 mev -193 mev introduced new method for calculating nuclear eos for finite nuclei including terms nuclear effective interaction calculated values agree with values giant monopole resonances work understanding effects of components effective interaction vanish in infinite nuclear matter limit new radioactive neutron proton rich nuclei study of eos symmetry energy finite nuclei urgent density constrained hf method step in direction | 0.361506 | 2,397 | 1,206 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,758 | the theoretical calculation for nonlinear refractive index _
n@xmath0 _ in cr@xmath1 : znse - active medium predicts the strong defocusing cascaded second - order nonlinearity within 2 - 3 @xmath2 m spectral range .
on the basis of this result the optimal cavity configuration for kerr - lens mode locking is proposed that allows to achieve a sub-100 fs pulse duration .
the numerical simulations testify about strong destabilizing processes in the laser resulting from a strong self - phase modulation .
the stabilization of the ultrashort pulse generation is possible due to spectral filtering that increases the pulse duration up to 300 fs
. international laser center , 65 skorina ave .
, bldg .
17 , minsk , 220027 belarus , tel./fax : ( 375 - 0172 ) 326 - 286 , e - mail : vkal@ilc.unibel.by , http://www.geocities.com/optomaplev | the intensive investigations of the cr@xmath1-doped laser media testify about their high potential in the tunable generation in mid - ir between 2 5 @xmath2 m .
a special interest is connected with cr@xmath1 : znse active medium due to its excellent material properties : high thermal conductivity which is close to that one of yag , the absence of excited state absorption , and very broad gain band which allows for tunable generation in 2 3 @xmath2 m range .
the latter is very attractive for a lot of applications : remote sensing , spectroscopy , ophthalmology , and neurosurgery . at this moment , the pulsed@xmath3 and continuous - wave operation@xmath4 in cr@xmath5 : znse lasers was demonstrated with ingaas and tm : yalo laser pumping , which demonstrated high efficiency and favorable lasing abilities of this active crystal . a very interesting property of cr@xmath1 : znse is the high coefficient of the nonlinear refraction@xmath6 that results from the relatively small bandgap , i. e. , in fact , from the semiconductor nature of the material .
as it is known , the higher nonlinear refraction is favorable to self - starting of kerr - lens mode locking@xmath7 .
the decrease of kerr - lens mode locking threshold allows to simplify the laser configuration , to improve the ultrashort pulse stability , and to increase the lasing efficiency .
another advantage of cr@xmath1 : znse as media for ultrashort pulse laser is a very broad gain band , which can support the generation of 12 fs pulses .
however , high nonlinear refraction coefficient is the source of some shortcomings .
as it was shown@xmath8 , the kerr - lens mode - locked lasers demonstrate a variety of unstable regimes that can destroy the ultrashort pulse and prevent from the pulse shortening . here , for first time to our knowledge
we analyze the kerr - lens mode locking abilities of cr@xmath1 : znse laser .
the analysis of znse nonlinear properties is presented that is necessary for an optimization of the laser design and for investigation of self - starting ability and ultrashort pulse stability in cr@xmath1 : znse laser .
as it is known@xmath6 , the two - photon absorption , raman scattering and stark effect strongly contribute to nonlinear refractivity in semiconductors .
the main parameter , which defines a value of nonlinear refraction coefficient @xmath9 , is the bandgap energy @xmath10 : @xmath11=\frac{k\sqrt{e_{p}}g_{2}(\frac{\hbar \omega } { e_{g}})}{% n_{0}e_{g}^{4}}.\ ] ] here @xmath12 is the linear coefficient of refraction ; @xmath13 for the most of direct gap semiconductors ; @xmath14 is a material - independent constant ; @xmath15 is the function depending only on the ratio of photon energy and the energy gap of the material . for znse @xmath16 .
for @xmath15 we used the following approximation in the below bandgap region : @xmath17which was obtained from experimental data presented in ref@xmath7 .
in addition to dependence of @xmath15 on wavelength , we have to take into account the dispersion of @xmath12 . for znse
the next approximation is valid : @xmath18(here @xmath19 is in meters ) . a resulting dependence of @xmath20 on wavelength is shown in fig .
1 . there is a strong kerr nonlinearity producing self - focusing effect .
the value of @xmath20 exceeds the typical values of the most of dielectric crystals by two orders of magnitude .
however , this is not sufficient for the estimation of the nonlinear properties of znse . despite the fact that znse has cubical lattice , there is not center of inversion in crystal . as result , the medium possesses the second - order nonlinear properties . the corresponding nonlinear coefficient @xmath21 .
although there is no efficient frequency conversion , the existence of second - order nonlinearity can strongly contributes to the nonlinear refractivity due to so - called cascaded second - order nonlinearity , which can be used for kerr - lens mode locking@xmath22 .
usually , change of the index of refractivity has non - kerr character , but the kerr - like approximation @xmath23 ( where @xmath24 is the field intensity ) is valid if@xmath25 @xmath26 , where @xmath27 ; @xmath28 ; @xmath29 , @xmath30 are the fundamental frequency and wave number , correspondingly ; @xmath31 , @xmath32 are the linear refractive index and wave number for the second harmonic .
our calculations showed , that the kerr approximation for znse is valid up to intensities of @xmath33 at 2 @xmath2 m and @xmath34 at 3 @xmath2 m , and it is used throughout present work .
the nonlinear coefficient of refraction due to cascading second - order nonlinearity is@xmath25 : @xmath35 note , that in the case of the normal dispersion of @xmath12 the nonlinearity due to second - order nonlinearity has a defocusing nature .
the dependence of @xmath9 on the wavelength is shown in fig .
one can see , that the nonlinear refraction is very strong . as result of the joint contribution of third- and second - order nonlinearities ,
a net - coefficient of nonlinear refraction is shown in fig .
3 . the nonlinearity is focusing up to 1.2 @xmath2 m and defocusing in mid - ir range .
an experimental value of @xmath20 measured at 1.06 @xmath2 m demonstrates an excellent agreement with the corresponding value of calculated curve in fig .
the obtained value of @xmath20 enables us to estimate a mode locking efficiency due to kerr - lensing .
we have used the method presented in @xmath36 : for each fixed value of the focal length of the mirror @xmath37 ( see fig .
4 ) we varied a folding distance and the position of active medium trying to maximize the value of @xmath38 , where @xmath39 is the effective transmission of the hard aperture .
this parameter defines the inverse saturation intensity of the efficient fast saturable absorber , induced by joint action of kerr self - focusing in active medium and difractional losses at aperture . for the common kerr - lens mode - locked lasers @xmath40 . in the case of znse
the modulation parameter is shown in fig .
it is seen , that the kerr - lensing efficiency in this case is higher by two orders of magnitude .
it is interestingly , that the defocusing nature of the nonlinearity does not affect the process of the cavity optimization essentially : the change of the sign of @xmath20 only slightly affects the position of active medium and folding distance .
the optimized cavity configuration is shown in fig .
calculated values of @xmath38 suggest a good kerr - lens mode locking ability of cr@xmath1 : znse laser . however , the strong self - phase modulation while being the positive factor facilitating self - focusing , can , on the other hand , destabilize an ultrashort pulse generation due to automodulational instability@xmath8 . in order to estimate the mode locking stability in cr@xmath1 : znse laser we performed the numerical simulation on the basis of fluctuation model and distributed scheme of the laser generation .
the master equation was : @xmath41 where @xmath42 is the field , @xmath43 is the longitudinal coordinate , @xmath44 is the saturated by full field energy gain coefficient , @xmath45 is the inverse bandwidth of the spectral filter , @xmath46 is the net - group delay dispersion , @xmath47 is the self - phase modulation parameter , @xmath48 is the active medium length , @xmath49 is the diffraction loss , defined from configuration of laser , @xmath50 = @xmath51 . the strong self - phase modulation and self - focusing dominate over the gain saturation .
the last factor provides the negative feedback in laser that stabilizes ultrashort pulse .
the critical parameter defining the ultrashort pulse dynamics is @xmath52 , where @xmath53 is the gain saturation fluency .
the decrease of this parameter worsens the pulse stability . to comparison , in znse @xmath54
is ten times lower than in ti : sapphire .
therefore , to obtain the stable pulse generation , we have to increase @xmath54 e.g. by increasing @xmath45 .
the stable pulses were obtained for @xmath55 .
the pulse duration was about 300 fs for 800 mw absorbed pump power .
an additional stabilization factor is the minimization ( down to zero ) of net - dispersion .
the character of the pulse destabilization needs some comments .
the typical scenarios are shown in figs .
the pulse behaviors presented here were calculated for the same set of the laser parameters but for different initial noise samples .
there are the possibilities for multipulse generation ( fig .
6 ) , generation of the breezer - like pulse and its subsequent disintegration ( fig .
7 ) , and the collapse of the pulse into several pulses ( fig . 8) .
note , that breezer - like pulse is formed without action of the soliton mechanism in laser because of net - dispersion in this case is close to @xmath56 .
the regime depicted in fig .
8 is characterized by low - frequency modulation of the generation spectrum that at last leads to the pulse collapse .
it should be noted , that the generation of the stable single pulse is depended on the random noise sample , too .
the analysis of the nonlinear properties of znse
crystal was performed .
it was found , that the strong second - order cascading nonlinearity in the combination with third - order phase nonlinearity causes a strong focusing kerr nonlinearity in near - ir and defocusing quasi - kerr nonlinearity in mid - ir ranges . as result ,
the efficiency of the kerr - lensing in active medium is two - three orders of magnitude higher than in typical active media of femtosecond lasers
. the optimal cavity configuration for kerr - lens mode locking was found .
but , as the analysis testifies , the main problem of the ultrashort pulse generation in cr@xmath1 : znse laser is the pulse destabilization due to strong self - phase modulation .
this requires to decrease the bandwidth of spectral filter .
the last allows to generate 300 fs pulses .
the self - start of kerr - lens mode locking has a statistical character , that is depended on the noise sample .
the investigation of the pulse destabilization testifies about formation of the breezer - like pulses and pulse collapse due to low frequency perturbations .
r.h . page , j.a .
skidmore , k.i . schaffers et al . , trends in optics and photonics , ( osa , washington , 1997 ) .
g. j. wagner , t. j. carring , r. h. page et al .
lett . , 24 , 19 ( 1999 ) .
m. sheik - bahae , d. c. hutchings , d. j. hagan , and e. w. van stryland , ieee j. quantum electr . ,
27 , 1296 ( 1991 ) .
+ 4 . c. radzewicz , g. w. pearson , and j. s. krasinski , optics .
commun . , 102 , 464 ( 1993 ) .
j. jasapara , v. l. kalashnikov , et al .
am . , b 17 , 319 ( 2000 ) .
r. l. sutherland , handbook of nonlinear optics ( ny , 1996 ) .
g. cerullo , s. de silvestry , a. monguzzi et al . ,
letts . , 20 , 746 ( 1995 ) .
v. l. kalashnikov , v. p. kalosha et al . , j. opt .
am . , b 14 , 964 ( 1997 ) . | investigations cr@xmath1-doped laser media high potential tunable generation mid - 2 5 @xmath2 m interest cr@xmath1 : znse active medium excellent material properties high thermal conductivity absence excited state absorption broad gain band tunable generation 2 3 @xmath2 m range attractive for remote sensing spectroscopy ophthalmology neurosurgery pulsed@xmath3 continuous - wave operation cr@xmath5 : znse lasers demonstrated with ingaas tm : yalo laser pumping high efficiency favorable lasing abilities cr@xmath1 : znse high coefficient nonlinear refraction small bandgap semiconductor nature material refraction self - starting kerr - lens mode locking decrease kerr - lens mode locking threshold laser configuration ultrashort pulse stability lasing efficiency advantage cr@xmath1 : znse ultrashort pulse laser broad gain band generation 12 fs pulses high nonlinear refraction coefficient source shortcomings kerr - lens mode - locked lasers unstable regimes destroy ultrashort pulse shortening kerr - lens mode locking abilities cr@xmath1 : znse laseranalysis znse nonlinear properties necessary for optimization laser design investigation self - starting ability ultrashort pulse stability in@xmath1 znse laser@xmath6 two - photon absorption raman scattering stark effect contribute to nonlinear refractivity in semiconductors main parameter nonlinear refraction coefficient @xmath9 bandgap energy @xmath10 @xmath11= @xmath12 linear coefficient refraction @xmath13 material - independent constant @xmath15 function depending on ratio photon energy energy gap material @xmath16 @xmath15 approximation bandgap region obtained from experimental data@xmath7 @xmath15 wavelength dispersion of @xmath12 znse approximation valid @xmath18 @xmath19 in meters dependence of @xmath20 on wavelength shown in fig . 1 strong kerr nonlinearity self - focusing effect value @xmath20 exceeds typical values dielectric crystals two orders not sufficient for estimation nonlinear properties znse znse cubical lattice center of inversion in crystalmedium second - order nonlinear properties nonlinear coefficient @xmath21 no efficient frequency conversion second - order nonlinearity to nonlinear refractivity cascaded second - nonlinearity for kerr - lens mode locking index refractivity non - kerr kerr - like approximation @xmath23 field intensity valid@xmath25 fundamental frequency wave number linear refractive index wave number for second harmonic kerr approximation for znse valid to intensities @xmath33 at 2 m at 3 @xmath2 m used work nonlinear coefficient refraction due cascading second - order nonlinearity is@xmath25 : @xmath35 normal dispersion @xmath12 nonlinearity - defocusing dependence @xmath9 on wavelength in fig nonlinear refraction strong - order nonlinearities net - coefficient of nonlinear refraction shown in fig . 3 nonlinearity focusing up to 1.2 @xmath2 m defocusing in mid - ir range experimental value @xmath20 at 1.06 @xmath2 m agreement with calculated curve fig value @xmath20 mode locking efficiency kerr - lensing used method @xmath36 value focal length @xmath37 varied folding distance position active medium value @xmath38 @xmath39 effective transmission hard aperture parameter defines inverse saturation intensity fast saturable absorber kerr self - focusing difractional losses aperture common kerr - lens mode - locked lasers @xmath40 znse modulation parameter shown in fig . kerr - lensing efficiency higher two orders defocusing nonlinearity affect cavity optimization change sign @xmath20 slightly affects position active medium folding distance optimized cavity configuration shown fig . values @xmath38 suggest good kerr - lens mode locking ability@xmath1 : znse laser strong self - phase modulation destabilize ultrashort pulse generation automodulational instability@xmath8 estimate mode locking stability@xmath1 : znse laser performed numerical simulation fluctuation model distributed scheme laser generationmaster equation @xmath41 @xmath42 field @xmath43 longitudinal coordinate @xmath44 saturated full field energy gain coefficient @xmath45 inverse bandwidth spectral filter net - group delay dispersion self - phase modulation parameter active medium length diffraction loss configuration laser @xmath50 = @xmath51 strong self - phase modulation self - focusing dominate gain saturation last factor negative feedback stabilizes ultrashort pulse critical parameter @xmath52 @xmath53 gain saturation fluency decrease worsens pulse stability znse @xmath54 ten times lower ti : sapphire stable pulse generation increase @xmath54 @xmath45 stable pulses for @xmath55 pulse duration 300 fs 800 mw pump power stabilization factor minimization net - dispersion character pulse destabilization typical scenarios shown in figs . pulse behaviors calculated same laser parameters different initial noise samples possibilities multipulse generation breezer - like pulse disintegration collapse into several pulses breezer - like pulse formed without action soliton mechanism laser net - dispersion close to @xmath56 regime fig .8 characterized by low - frequency modulation generation leads to pulse collapse generation stable single pulse on random noise sample analysis nonlinear properties znse crystal strong second - order cascading nonlinearity third - order phase nonlinearity causes focusing kerr nonlinearity in near - ir defocusing quasi - kerr nonlinearity mid - ir ranges efficiency kerr - lensing in active medium - three orders higher than typical femtosecond lasers optimal cavity configuration for kerr - lens mode locking found main problem ultrashort pulse generation in znse laser pulse destabilization due to strong self - phase modulation requires bandwidth spectral filter allows 300 fs pulses self - start of kerr - lens mode locking statistical character on noise sample investigation pulse destabilization breezer - like pulses pulse collapse due to low frequency perturbations page skidmore schaffers trends in optics photonics 1997 wagner carring page 24 , 19 1999 - hutchings stryland quantum electr. 27 1296 1991 radzewiczpearson krasinski optics 102 , 464 ( 1993 ) j jasapara kalashnikov b 17 , 319 ( 2000 ) sutherland handbook nonlinear optics 1996 ) cerullo de silvestry monguzzi letts 20 , 746 ( 1995 ) v l. kalashnikov kalosha opt 14 , 964 ( 1997 ) | 0.434243 | 2,671 | 1,335 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,783 | we show that if no @xmath0-plane contains almost all of an @xmath0-rectifiable set @xmath1 , then there exists a single @xmath2-plane @xmath3 such that the radial projection of @xmath4 has positive @xmath0-dimensional measure from every point outside @xmath3 . | the purpose of this note is to investigate the relation between rectifiability and * radial projections * @xmath5 , @xmath6 , defined by the expression @xmath7 .
motivated by the famous result of besicovitch and federer concerning orthogonal projections ( see ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 18.1 ) ) , one has reason to anticipate that the radial projections @xmath8 of @xmath0-rectifiable sets @xmath1 with @xmath9 ought to have positive @xmath10 measure for almost all parameters @xmath6 , whereas the opposite behaviour should be manifest in the purely unrectifiable case .
the problem of verifying this intuition in the unrectifiable case appears to be rather involved , and only partial results are available ( see the discussion and references in section [ unrectifiable ] ) ; this note complements those results by settling the rectifiable case .
we show that if no @xmath0-plane contains almost all of an @xmath0-rectifiable set @xmath1 with @xmath9 , then @xmath10 almost all radial projections of @xmath4 have positive @xmath0-dimensional measure .
we also provide an accurate worst case description of the geometry of the * exceptional set * @xmath11 .
our studies were initiated by a question on directions of rectifiable sets , raised by iosevich , mourgoglou and senger in the recent preprint @xcite : a positive answer to this question is acquired in remark [ ims ] .
an @xmath10 measurable set @xmath12 with @xmath13 is called @xmath0-*rectifiable * if there are countably many @xmath14-embeddings @xmath15 such that @xmath16 this definition is equivalent to the classical definition of rectifiability , where we consider coverings by lipschitz - images instead of @xmath14-manifolds , see ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 15.21 ) .
we include the requirement @xmath9 in the definition of rectifiability merely to avoid repetition .
we say that a set @xmath12 is @xmath0-*flat * , if there exists an @xmath0-plane @xmath17 such that @xmath18 . relaxing this condition slightly
, we say that @xmath4 is * essentially * @xmath0-*flat * , if @xmath19 .
our main result is the following .
[ thm1 ] let @xmath1 be an @xmath0-rectifiable set , which is not essentially @xmath0-flat .
then @xmath20 for @xmath21 almost every @xmath22 . is not , strictly speaking , well defined , if @xmath23 . here , and
in the rest of the paper , the notation @xmath8 should be interpreted as @xmath24 .
] moreover , the exceptional set is always @xmath25-flat .
a @xmath26-plane is , by definition , a singleton in @xmath27 .
note that the result fails for any essentially flat set @xmath1 .
indeed , if @xmath4 essentially @xmath0-flat , then we may find an @xmath0-plane @xmath17 such that @xmath28 .
write @xmath29 the first set on the right is @xmath21 null , since @xmath30 .
for every @xmath31 , the second one is a subset of an @xmath25-sphere .
hence @xmath32 for every @xmath31 .
furthermore , the exceptional set can be an @xmath25-plane .
for this just take any two @xmath0-planes @xmath33 and @xmath34 such that @xmath35 but @xmath36 is non - empty .
now @xmath3 is an @xmath25-plane .
define @xmath37 .
then , for every @xmath38 , the radial projection @xmath39 consists of two @xmath25-spheres .
hence , @xmath32 for every @xmath38 .
the main result is a consequence of the following lemma , which concerns the local bilipschitz - properties of the radial projection .
[ lemma1 ] let @xmath40 be a @xmath41-embedding , and let @xmath42 be a point such that @xmath43 . then ,
if @xmath44 , there exists @xmath45 such that @xmath46 is bilipschitz .
we may and will assume that @xmath47 .
write @xmath48 , and fix @xmath49 . since @xmath50 is differentiable at @xmath51 , say , we have @xmath52({\mathbf{y}}- { \mathbf{z } } ) + { \varepsilon}({\mathbf{y}}- { \mathbf{z}})|{\mathbf{y}}- { \mathbf{z}}| , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath53 is , as usual , some function with the property that @xmath54 as @xmath55 in @xmath56 .
denote the three vectors on the previous line by @xmath57 and @xmath58 .
since @xmath43 , we have the inequality @xmath59 for some @xmath60 . on the other hand , choosing @xmath61 and @xmath62 close to @xmath47 ensures that @xmath63 and @xmath51 are close to @xmath64 , since @xmath50 is an embedding .
it follows that @xmath65 as soon as @xmath66 . above @xmath67
can be made arbitrarily small by taking @xmath45 small .
here we also needed the fact that @xmath50 is continuously differentiable .
denote by @xmath68 the orthogonal projection onto @xmath69 . since @xmath70
, we may estimate @xmath71 the factor of @xmath72 tends to one as @xmath73 , so this may be re - written more neatly as @xmath74 next fix @xmath75 . by making @xmath76 yet smaller if necessary , we may assume that @xmath77 for any @xmath78 . hence there exists @xmath79 such that @xmath80 for @xmath81 .
now we claim that there exists @xmath60 ( not necessarily the same as before ) such that @xmath82 where @xmath83 is the angle formed by @xmath84 and @xmath85
. assume the contrary and locate @xmath66 with @xmath86 .
denote by @xmath87 the orthogonal projection of @xmath84 onto the line spanned by @xmath85 .
then , as the picture shows , @xmath88 hence @xmath89 .
thus we have shown that @xmath90 for some @xmath91 and @xmath92 .
this yields @xmath93 taking @xmath68 on both sides and estimating , @xmath94|y - z| .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath67 could be chosen arbitrarily small and @xmath79 , we have reached a contradiction . thus ( [ form1 ] ) holds .
the angle formed by any points @xmath95 and @xmath96 on @xmath97 is precisely @xmath83 , and this angle is of the same order of magnitude as @xmath98 .
thus @xmath99 hence @xmath100 restricted to @xmath101 is bilipschitz .
choose a @xmath14-embedding @xmath102 so that @xmath103 intersects @xmath4 in a set of positive @xmath10 measure .
next choose a point @xmath104 such that @xmath105 and @xmath106 is a density point of @xmath107 .
all this is possible by sard s theorem and the fact that @xmath10 almost every point of @xmath107 is a density point .
write @xmath108 . by our assumption , @xmath109 .
now repeat the previous procedure : choose a @xmath14-embedding @xmath110 such that @xmath111 intersects @xmath112 in a set of positive @xmath10 measure .
also , pick a point @xmath113 such that , again , @xmath114 and @xmath115 is a density point of @xmath116 .
. then @xmath35 .
let @xmath22 . if @xmath118 .
then , by lemma [ lemma1 ] , there exists @xmath45 such that @xmath119 is bilipschitz . since @xmath120 has positive @xmath21 measure , so does @xmath121 .
similarly , if @xmath122 , we find @xmath45 such that @xmath123 \cap m_2 \cap b(z_2,\delta))$ ] has positive @xmath21 measure .
this implies that the set of all @xmath22 with @xmath32 is necessarily a subset of @xmath124 , which is always contained in an @xmath2-plane .
[ ims ] in ( * ? ? ? * conjecture 1.12 ) , iosevich _ et al .
_ asked the following : _
if @xmath4 is @xmath125-rectifiable and not @xmath125-flat , then does the set of directions @xmath126 always have positive @xmath127 measure ? _
lemma [ lemma1 ] implies a positive answer : one may even replace @xmath128 by any integer @xmath129 .
in fact , slightly more is true : if @xmath1 is an @xmath0-rectifiable set , which is not @xmath0-flat , then there exists @xmath23 such that @xmath20
. the proof of this is almost the same as that of theorem [ thm1 ] only simpler . choose a @xmath14-embedding @xmath40 , such that @xmath48 intersects @xmath4 in a set of positive @xmath10 measure .
then choose a point @xmath130 such that @xmath43 and @xmath131 is a density point of @xmath132 .
write @xmath133 . by our assumption @xmath134 , so we may choose a point @xmath135 .
now lemma [ lemma1 ] yields @xmath45 such that @xmath136 is bilipschitz .
since @xmath137 has positive @xmath21 measure , so does @xmath138 .
in analogue with the besicovitch - federer projection theorem , it seems reasonable to conjecture that the following converse for the result in this note is also true : the radial projections @xmath39 of every purely @xmath0-unrectifiable set @xmath12 are @xmath10 null for @xmath21 almost every @xmath23 .
this was recently verified for self - similar sets in @xmath139 satisfying the open set condition by simon and solomyak in @xcite . in @xcite marstrand and mattila also proved that @xmath140 can only happen for @xmath141 in a set of dimension at most @xmath0 . in the plane ,
at least , this upper bound can not be improved : marstrand exhibited an example of a purely @xmath142-unrectifiable set @xmath143 , which projects radially onto a set of positive length in a set of hausdorff - dimension exactly @xmath142 .
a related phenomenon was discovered by csrnyei and preiss in @xcite : given a purely @xmath142-unrectifiable set @xmath143 with @xmath144 , there exists a @xmath142-rectifiable set @xmath145 with @xmath146 such that for @xmath147 almost every @xmath23 almost every line passing through @xmath141 intersects @xmath148 in an infinite set . | relation between rectifiability radial projections @xmath5 defined @xmath7 motivated by result besicovitch federer orthogonal projections theorem 18.1 radial projections @xmath8 of @xmath0-rectifiable sets @xmath1 positive @xmath10 measure for all parameters @xmath6 opposite in unrectifiable case verifying intuition in unrectifiable case partial results available note complements results rectifiable case show if no @xmath0-plane contains @xmath0-rectifiable set @xmath1 with @xmath9 radial projections of @xmath4 have positive @xmath0-dimensional measure provide accurate worst case description of geometry of exceptional set @xmath11 studies initiated by question on directions rectifiable sets iosevich mourgoglou senger positive answer acquired in remark @xmath10 measurable set @xmath12 with @xmath13 called @xmath0-*rectifiable if many @xmath14-embeddings @xmath15 definition equivalent to classical definition rectifiability coverings lipschitz - images @xmath14-manifolds theorem 15.21 include requirement @xmath9 in definition rectifiability to avoid repetitionset @xmath12 is @xmath0-*flat if @xmath0-plane @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath4 @xmath0-*flat if @xmath19 @xmath1 @xmath0-rectifiable set not essentially @xmath0-flat @xmath20 for @xmath21 @xmath22 not defined if @xmath23 notation @xmath8 interpreted as @xmath24 exceptional set @xmath25-flat @xmath26-plane singleton in @xmath27 result fails for essentially flat set @xmath1 if @xmath4 @xmath0-flat @xmath0-plane @xmath17 @xmath28 @xmath29 first set is @xmath21 null @xmath30 @xmath31 second one subset of @xmath25-sphere @xmath32 for every @xmath31 exceptional set be @xmath25-plane two @xmath0-planes @xmath33 and @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 non - empty @xmath3 @xmath25-plane define @xmath37 @xmath38 radial projection @xmath39 two @xmath25-spheres @xmath32 for every @xmath38main result lemma concerns local bilipschitz - properties radial projection lemma1 @xmath40 @xmath41-embedding @xmath42 point @xmath43 if @xmath44 exists @xmath45 @xmath46 bilipschitz assume @xmath47 write @xmath48 fix @xmath49 @xmath50 differentiable at @xmath51 @xmath52({\mathbf{y}}- {z + @xmath53 function with property @xmath54 as @xmath55 in @xmath56 denote three vectors by @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath43 inequality @xmath59 for @xmath60 choosing @xmath61 @xmath62 close to @xmath47 ensures @xmath63 @xmath51 close to @xmath64 @xmath50 embedding @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 made arbitrarily small by @xmath45 small @xmath50 continuously differentiable denote @xmath68 orthogonal projection onto @xmath69 @xmath70 estimate @xmath71 factor @xmath72 @xmath73 re - written as @xmath74 fix @xmath75making @xmath76 smaller assume @xmath77 for @xmath78 exists @xmath79 @xmath80 for @xmath81 claim @xmath60 @xmath82 @xmath83 angle by @xmath84 @xmath85 assume contrary locate @xmath66 with @xmath86 @xmath87 orthogonal projection @xmath84 line @xmath85 @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 yields @xmath93 @xmath68 both sides @xmath94|y - z @xmath67 chosen small @xmath79 contradiction form1 holds angle @xmath95 @xmath96 on @xmath97 is @xmath83 same magnitude as @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 restricted to @xmath101 bilipschitz choose @xmath14-embedding @xmath102 @xmath103 intersects @xmath4 positive @xmath10 choose point @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 density point of @xmath107 possible sard s theorem @xmath10 point @xmath107 density point write @xmath108 @xmath109repeat previous procedure choose @xmath14-embedding @xmath110 @xmath111 intersects @xmath112 positive @xmath10 measure pick point @xmath113 @xmath114 and @xmath115 density point of @xmath116 @xmath35 @xmath22 @xmath118 exists @xmath45 @xmath119 is bilipschitz @xmath120 has positive @xmath21 measure does @xmath121 if @xmath122 find @xmath45 @xmath123 has positive @xmath21 measure implies set @xmath22 with @xmath32 subset of @xmath124 @xmath2-plane conjecture 1.12 iosevich asked if @xmath4 is @xmath125-rectifiable not @xmath125-flat set directions @xmath126 have positive @xmath127 measure ? implies positive answer replace @xmath128 by @xmath129 if @xmath1 is @xmath0-rectifiable set not @xmath0-flat exists @xmath23 @xmath20 proof simpler choose @xmath14-embedding @xmath40 @xmath48 intersects @xmath4 positive @xmath10 measurechoose point @xmath130 @xmath43 density point @xmath132 write @xmath133 assumption @xmath134 choose point @xmath135 lemma yields @xmath45 @xmath136 bilipschitz @xmath137 positive @xmath21 measure @xmath138 besicovitch - federer projection theorem converse radial projections @xmath39 @xmath0-unrectifiable set @xmath12 @xmath10 null for @xmath21 @xmath23 verified self - similar sets @xmath139 open set condition by simon solomyak @xcite marstrand mattila proved @xmath140 @xmath141 set dimension @xmath0 upper bound improved marstrand @xmath142-unrectifiable set @xmath143 projects radially set positive length hausdorff - dimension @xmath142 csrnyei preiss @xcite @xmath142-unrectifiable set @xmath143 @xmath144 @xmath142-rectifiable set @xmath145 with @xmath146 @xmath147 @xmath23 line @xmath141 intersects @xmath148 infinite set | 0.359551 | 2,570 | 1,483 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,786 | the idea of secure communication of digital signals via chaos synchronization has been plagued by the possibility of attractor reconstruction by eavesdroppers as pointed out by prez and cerdeira . in this letter
, we wish to present a very simple mechanism by which this problem can be overcome , wherein the signal is transmitted via a multistep parameter modulation combined with alternative driving of different transmitter variables , which makes the attractor reconstruction impossible .
the method is illustrated by means of the lorenz system and chua s circuit as examples .
the work of pecora and carroll [ 1990,1991 ] on synchronization of chaotic signals has suggested the possibility of secure communication using chaos synchronization .
they have shown that two chaotic systems can be synchronized when they are linked by a common signal ( driving signal ) provided the lyapunov exponents of the subsystem are all negative . following this suggestion a number of methods
have been proposed for secure communication [ lakshmanan & murali , 1996 ; hayes et al . , 1993 ; cuomo & oppenheim , 1993 ; murali & lakshmanan , 1993a,1993b ; kocarev & parlitz , 1995 ; zhang et al . , 1998 ] with the help of chaotic signals .
cuomo and oppenheim [ 1993 ] have shown that a small difference between the corresponding parameters in the drive and response systems will cause synchronization frustration between the transmitter and receiver variables . using this property ,
they have suggested a very simple method for digital signal transmission and illustrated it with the lorenz system .
however , prez and cerdeira [ 1995 ] have pointed out that it is possible to reconstruct the message by an eavesdropper from a simple return map formed by the extrema of the modulated driving signal ( here , the driving signal is used as a carrier signal in the digital signal transmission . in our method
the digital message is imposed on this carrier signal through parameter variation .
so , we call the driving signal bearing the digital message as modulated driving signal and the modulation as parameter modulation . ) , even without synchronization with the receiver system . to overcome the above problem several methods
have been suggested by many authors recently [ murali & lakshmanan , 1998 ; mensour & longtin , 1998 ; minai & pandian , 1998 ] : private communication using compound chaotic signal technique , using delay - differential equations technique , communication through noise and so on .
however , most of the above methods are very complicated and are often difficult to implement . in this letter , we describe a simple method by which the digital signal can be highly masked with the chaotic signal by using a multistep parameter modulation and show how it can be further complicated by introducing two different drive signals alternatively instead of a single drive signal . as a result , reconstruction of
the message becomes virtually impossible and this provides further development in the technique of secure communication using chaotic signals . in order to present our method , we make use of the dynamical system used by cuomo and oppenheim [ 1993 ] namely the lorenz system . the associated evolution equations at the transmitter end are @xmath0 while at the receiver end , corresponding to an @xmath1-drive , they read as @xmath2 where @xmath3 and the parameter @xmath4 chosen for the purpose of modulation can have either the value @xmath5 or @xmath6 .
the numerical value of the parameter @xmath4 at the receiver end is kept at a constant value 4.0 , while in the transmitter circuit it is changed between two values , namely 4.0 and 4.4 , when the digital signal is zero and one , respectively .
the transmitted digital message is reconstructed by using the synchronization error power @xmath7 .
it is negligible when the transmitter and the receiver systems are synchronized , while it has some finite value when they are not synchronized .
thus the receiver will synchronize with the transmitter when the parameter @xmath4 in the latter takes a value @xmath5 , while asynchronization takes place when @xmath8 at the transmitter .
it may be noted that instead of the @xmath1-drive at the receiver end one can as well use the @xmath9-drive in which case the eq.(2 ) will be modified as @xmath10 in the work of prez and cerdeira [ 1995 ] , it has been shown that even without any receiver circuit , one can unmask the message from the modulated drive signal . in this reference , the maxima @xmath11 and minima
@xmath12 are collected from the modulated driving signal and the new varibles @xmath13 and @xmath14 are defined .
the plot of the return map for @xmath15 vs @xmath16 is shown in fig .
1 . note that there are 3 segments in the attractor each one of which is further split into two strips ( one corresponding to the high state and the other corresponding to low state of the digital message ) .
it is obvious that the split in the attractor is due to the change of the parameter @xmath4 at the sender end between the values @xmath5 and @xmath6 . from the return map
one can easily unmask the message by finding the strip on which the point@xmath17 falls in each segment of the attractor .
we can call the above procedure as a single - step parameter modulation , since @xmath4 can have only one value for one state of the message ( that is , @xmath4 can take only a single value @xmath6 for any high state in the digital message and only @xmath5 for the low state digital signal at the transmitter ) .
the crux of the problem is then that from the nature of the chaotic attractor and the return map of the lorenz system , one can have only eight possibilities of message reconstruction from which one can easily discover the actual message .
then , one possible way to overcome such a reconstruction is to increase the number of possible ways by which message can be reconstructed to an unmanageable level and thereby eliminating the possibility of identifying the correct message . in our work , we have effected two changes in the mode of transmission of the digital message by the parameter modulation in order to complicate the attractor in the return map .
firstly , in the sender part , instead of using a single - step parameter modulation , we use a multi - step parameter modulation , where for one state of the digital message ( either @xmath18 or @xmath19 ) , the parameter @xmath4 in the sender equation is assigned to have any one of the @xmath20 preassigned values ( @xmath21 and sufficiently large ) , while at the receiver part we use @xmath20 receiver subsystems with different parameters .
we call the number @xmath20 as the step of the modulation .
secondly , we will use both @xmath1 and @xmath9 signals to drive the receiver subsystems alternatively during the transmission as indicated in eqs.(2 ) and ( 3 ) .
the block diagram of the transmitter and the receiver with modulation step @xmath20 is shown in fig .
2 , where r@xmath22,r@xmath23, ... r@xmath24 are the subsystems of the receiver .
each one of the @xmath25s is assigned a specific value among the @xmath20 chosen parameter values which are used to impose the high state of the digital message on the driving signal .
the synchronization error power at the output of each subsystem is fed into low pass filters(lpfs ) separately .
then the filtered signal is converted into a digital signal at threshold detectors(td)[cuomo & oppenheim , 1993 ] , which is then passed through not gates in order to invert and to confirm with the original assignment of high and low states of the digital signal .
an or gate at the receiver combines all the outputs from the not gates .
thus , when the digital message imposed on the driving signal is @xmath18 , any one of the @xmath20 subsystems at the receiver will synchronize and the output at the or gate will be @xmath18. none of the subsystems will synchronize , if the modulated digital message is zero , and hence @xmath19 will be the output of the or gate .
we illustrate our method in the case of the lorenz system with the same parameters used by prez and cerdeira [ 1995 ] and with the modulation step as small as @xmath26 .
the lorenz system ( 1 ) is known to exibit chaotic behavior when the parameter @xmath4 takes any value between @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
one can assign a specific value to @xmath4 within this range for the purpose of modulation .
we select the region @xmath29 for the illustration of our method . as an example , the parameter @xmath4 in the transmitting system is allowed to take any one of the five values @xmath30 for high state of the digital signal , while it can have any one the values @xmath31 for the low state . in the receiver part
, we use 5 subsystems with the modulation parameter @xmath4 fixed at @xmath30 respectively .
the method works as follows .
suppose we have a high state in the digital message , to start with .
then , the receiver is driven by the modulated driving signal with modulation parameter @xmath32 .
for the next high state in the message the modulation is done with @xmath4 = @xmath33 and this process continues upto the @xmath4 value @xmath34 .
then the value of @xmath4 is reset to @xmath35 .
this procedure is also applicable to the low state of the message but with the modulation parameter(@xmath4 ) taking the values @xmath36 in that order . in the receiver
part , all the subsystems are driven by the modulated driving signal . however , the subsystems @xmath37 and @xmath38 will synchronize only for the values of modulation parameter at the transmitter , @xmath39 respectively . when the synchronization is achieved in a subsystem
, the error power will be below the threshold level and so the message obtained from td will be at the low state .
it is inverted to the high state using the not gate .
but a low state is attained by the digital message at the not gate , if the subsystem is not synchronized .
thus a high state message is obtained as an output at the or gate if any one of the subsystems is synchronized and a low state digital message is recovered when asynchronization takes place at all the subsystems . a test digital message transmitted and recovered by this scheme by numerical simulation is shown in fig .
3 .
actually the above possibility is only a test case and has been discussed for illustrative purpose .
one can modulate @xmath4 in a random way also ( that is , at the transmitter circuit , @xmath4 can be assigned any one of the @xmath20 chosen values in a random manner ) rather than in a predetermined way .
the method presented here is applicable equally well to such possibilities also .
the return map constructed using the modulated driving signal is shown in fig .
4 . here
we have 10 strips in each segment .
this corresponds to @xmath40 strips , where @xmath20 is the step of the parameter modulation .
because of the complicated nature of the return map it is very difficult to find the strip on which the point@xmath17 falls in each segment of the attractor and so it is difficult to unmask the message from the return map . even if one can identify the location of the points in the strip , still one has a serious difficulty in assigning 0 and 1 to the strips since there are @xmath41 chances to make a mistake , for a successful reconstruction of the message . for @xmath42
, there are 7 chances [ pre & cerdeira , 1995 ] of making a mistake during the unmasking of the message from the modulated driving signal and for @xmath26 , this chances increases to a high value of 1,067,462,647 ( of the order of @xmath43 ) .
so it is almost impossible to unmask the message masked by our scheme , even at as low value as @xmath26 .
we can complicate the attractor in the return map further by the second method . in the lorenz system , synchronization [ pecora & carroll , 1991 ] is possible by both @xmath1 driving and @xmath9 driving , since the conditional lyapunov exponents are all negative in both the cases .
we use this property in the second method . here
the principle of transmitting and receiving the message is the same as described above , but instead of using a single driving signal @xmath44 , we now use both @xmath44 and @xmath45 as the driving signals alternatively . for the odd digital bits , we drive the receiver by modulated @xmath44 whereas the even digital bits are transmitted using modulated @xmath45 as the driving signal . the block diagram of the transmitting and receiving systems with modulation step @xmath20 is shown in fig .
5 . here
we use @xmath46 subsystems in the receiver , @xmath47 subsystems for each value of modulation parameter ( which are used for the transmission of high state of the digital message ) , one with modulated @xmath1 driving and the other with modulated @xmath9 driving .
the recovered message is similar to the one obtained in our previous method .
the return map constructed from the modulated drive signals ( modulated x(t ) and modulated y(t ) ) for the modulation step @xmath20=5 is shown in fig .
6 . from the return map ,
it is impossible to unmask the message since the attractor of the @xmath9 drive signal is merged with the attractor of the @xmath1 driving signal .
we have also applied our scheme to the simplest autonomous chua circuit generator of the chaotic signal [ madan , 1993 ; chua et al . ,
1992 ] .
we have used the unnormalized circuit equations @xmath48 where @xmath49 $ ] during our verification with @xmath50 as the modulation parameter .
the other parameters value used are @xmath51 , @xmath52 and @xmath53 .
the chua circuit can also be synchronized either with the driving signal @xmath54 or with @xmath55 and so we can again use them as alternative drive variables .
one can assign any value to the parameter @xmath50 between @xmath56 to @xmath57 , except in some small regions where periodic windows occur . here
the largest lyapunov exponent calculated has positive values and hence the circuit exibits chaotic behaviour .
we find from our numerical studies that it is even more difficult to extract message in this case with multiparameter modulation compared to the lorenz system , due to the nature of the chaotic attractor .
thus , in this letter , we have described two simple and straightforward methods to complicate the attractor in the return map of the modulated driving signal : one with multi - step parameter modulation by using a number of values to the modulation parameter @xmath4 and the other by using alternative @xmath1 and @xmath9 driving combined with multistep parameter modulation .
we have illustrated them with the lorenz system and chua s circuit as examples .
we conclude that it is almost impossible to reconstruct the digital message transmitted in our scheme by the use of the return map formed by the modulated driving signal .
this work has been supported by the national board of higher mathematics , department of atomic energy , government of india and the department of science and technology , government of india through the research projects .
the authors thank dr .
k. murali for many valuable suggestions . | chua , l.o . , kocarev , lj . , eckert , k. & itoh , m. [ 1992 ] experimental chaos synchronization in chua s circuit " int . j. bifurcation and chaos * 2 * 705 - 708 . | chua l.o kocarev lj eckert itoh 1992 experimental chaos synchronization chua s circuit bifurcation chaos 705 - | 0.065781 | 61 | 31 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,789 | exotic antidecuplet baryons are predicted to be not only surprisingly light but also very narrow .
first we explain how small decay width arises in the quark soliton model .
next , we study possible mixing of exotic antidecuplet with roper octet and discuss its phenomenological consequences . | despite recent scepticism concerning early announcements of the discovery of exotic strange baryon @xmath0 two collaborations diana and leps confirmed their original results @xcite .
we refer the reader to recent experimental reviews @xcite . in this article following @xcite
we assume that @xmath1 exists with a mass equal 1540 mev and total width @xmath2 mev .
an immediate consequences is the existence of the whole exotic su(3 ) multiplet : @xmath3 .
apart from truly exotic states antidecuplet contains cryptoexotic nucleon- ( @xmath4 ) and @xmath5-like states ( @xmath6 ) .
the interpretation of these states is not well understood : one may try to associate them with some known resonances , or one may postulate the existence of new resonances with nucleon or @xmath5 quantum numbers .
this is the approach which we adopt here @xcite . following refs .
@xcite@xcite we assume that there exists new , narrow nucleon resonance @xmath7 which we will interpret as a member of @xmath3 .
if so , @xmath8 decays have to satisfy the following constraints @xcite originally discussed in @xcite:@xmath9 unfortunately the small partial width of @xmath7 to @xmath10 contradicts su(3 ) symmetry relations between the decay constants of @xmath8 . in this short note
we would like to emphasize the importance of mixing both for decays and mass spectra of the putative exotic antidecuplet baryons .
the exotic states have been already anticipated by the founders of the quark model although they did not elaborate on them .
later the arguments have been raised that they should be heavy and wide .
in contrast , chiral soliton models predicted that the pentaquark masses were generically small ( _ i.e. _ in the range of 1.51.6 gev ) @xcite .
it was much more difficult to accommodate the small decay width of @xmath1 @xcite . in sect .
[ decaywidths ] we explain how small decay width arises naturally in the chiral soliton quark model ( @xmath11qsm ) .
next , in sect .
[ gmo ] we argue that the decay coupling @xmath12 is further reduced due to gell - mann okubo ( gmo ) mixing caused by the nonzero @xmath13 . in sect .
[ rmixing ] we show how additional mixing of @xmath3 with roper octet can change decay patterns of @xmath14 .
we estimate allowed range of mixing angles and present predictions for remaining members of @xmath3 : @xmath6 and @xmath15 .
conclusions are presented in sect .
in in ref . @xcite the following nonrelativistic formula for the decay width has been used : @xmath16 it follows from the goldberger - treimann relation between axial and strong decay constants . here
@xmath17 is the mass of the decaying baryon , @xmath18 the mass of the decay product and @xmath19 is the outgoing meson momentum .
generically @xmath20 given by ( [ gammadef ] ) would be still in the range of a few hundreds of mev @xcite if not for the terms non - leading in @xmath21 expansion .
indeed , even without mixing the decay constant @xmath22 , which stands for the matrix element of the tensor decay operator @xmath23 between the physical baryon wave functions @xmath24:@xmath25 is the sum of three different contributions that are formally of different order in @xmath21 .
however , they are multiplied by the su(3 ) clebsch - gordan coefficients that also depend on @xmath26 @xcite .
for example : @xmath27 where @xmath28 .
similarly@xmath29 chiral soliton models provide us with specific predictions for constants @xmath30 @xcite .
had we neglected @xmath31 and @xmath32 in eqs.([gtnk],[gdnpi ] ) ( which would be inconsistent for @xmath12 because of @xmath26 enhancement of @xmath31 ) we would have obtained for @xmath33:@xmath34 estimating @xmath35 from the experimental value of @xmath36 decay width , and consequently@xmath37 we see that small decay width of @xmath1 results from the cancelation in ( [ gtnk ] ) .
indeed , the authors of ref . @xcite have shown that in the nonrelativistic limit of @xmath11qsm one obtains that @xmath38 with @xmath39 and consequently @xmath40 ! in the same limit @xmath11qsm predicts that @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
it follows that antidecuplet decay constants are small .
treating @xmath13 corrections as perturbation introduces mixing @xcite@xmath43 where subscripts refer to spin .
for some specific states mixing constants @xmath44 may be equal zero due to the isospin .
for example @xmath1 mixes only with @xmath45 , but this component of the wave function does not contribute to the decays to octet .
therefore only mixing of the final nucleon with @xmath3 and @xmath46 modifies the decay constant:@xmath47 ^{2}. \label{gtnkmix}%\ ] ] since @xmath48 is small the admixtures proportional to the reduced matrix elements@xmath49 are important even if mixing parameters @xmath50 and @xmath51 are not large ( for definitions see ref .
neither @xmath52 nor @xmath53 vanish in the nonrelativistic limit . therefore in this limit @xmath1 decay
occurs entirely due to the mixing . for realistic model parameters
( when @xmath54 ) there is a cancelation ( note that @xmath55 and @xmath56 ) between different terms in ( [ gtnkmix ] ) and @xmath12 is further suppressed . mixing affects decay patterns of pentaquarks violating su(3 ) relations between the decay constants @xmath22 @xcite . on somewhat more phenomenological ground
let us consider only @xmath57 mixing @xcite defining@xmath58 which can be directly extracted from ( [ gammadef ] ) if @xmath59 is known . throughout this paper
we assume that @xmath60 mev , hence @xmath61 .
it is then possible to express decay constants of other members of antidecuplet in terms of measurable physical parameters such as @xmath62 mixing angle @xmath63 and one a priori unknown parameter @xmath64 which can be estimated from @xmath11qsm calculations . here
we take @xmath65 @xcite
. then we have for example:@xmath66 if we want to interpret @xmath7 as @xmath8 we need to satisfy bounds ( [ conditions ] ) .
this is quite difficult within one angle scenario .
it is possible to nullify @xmath67 by a suitable choice of mixing angle @xmath68 , but then the mean octet mass ( i.e. the nucleon mass before mixing ) which is experimentally @xmath69 mev comes out wrong @xcite:@xmath70 the mixing angle that satisfies ( [ conditions ] ) is order of magnitude too small to account for baryon masses . for realistic mixing angles @xmath67 is dominated by @xmath71 and @xmath72 in contradiction with experimental data for @xmath7 .
in order to satisfy conditions ( [ conditions ] ) with more realistic mixing angles we have considered in ref .
@xcite scenario in which exotic antidecuplet can mix with roper resonance octet ( mixing angle @xmath73 ) . for roper octet gmo mass formulae work with much worse accuracy than for the ground state octet @xcite , so there is a need for additional mixing . since @xmath74 @xcite roper decay to @xmath75 is negligible
. however roper admixture contributes to @xmath76 and other decay modes:@xmath77 since @xmath78 is comparable with @xmath71 one may suppress @xmath67 without changing much @xmath79 . in ref .
@xcite we have found that conditions ( [ conditions ] ) are satisfied in the vicinity of the line @xmath80 we see that mixing angles are reasonable .
the decay widths and branching ratio to @xmath75 along ( [ or_lin ] ) are plotted in fig .
[ fig : twoangles ] to @xmath10 ( long dashed red line ) in mev together with branching ratio ( short dashed blue line ) of @xmath81 as functions of mixing angle @xmath63 along the line ( [ or_lin ] ) .
thin vertical lines correspond to the limits on the mixing angle @xmath63 .
the plot is made for @xmath82 . ] in fig .
[ fig : gn10bar ] we plot @xmath67 and @xmath83 together with their different components along the line ( [ or_lin ] ) .
we see that indeed @xmath67 is small due to the cancellation between @xmath71 and @xmath84 , while @xmath85 rises moderately when mixing increases .
( solid lines ) with different components defined in eq .
( [ gn10bar ] ) shown by dashed lines .
the plot is made for @xmath82.,title="fig : " ] ( solid lines ) with different components defined in eq .
( [ gn10bar ] ) shown by dashed lines .
the plot is made for @xmath82.,title="fig : " ] having established the range of mixing angles we can predict masses of the remaining antidecuplet members @xcite:@xmath86 note that bound ( [ xirange ] ) contradicts the result of na49 @xmath87 mev @xcite . from our analysis
it follows that total decay width of @xmath15 to @xmath88 and @xmath89 is of the order of 10 mev .
total width of @xmath6 does not exceed 30 mev but is also constrained from below to be larger that 10 mev .
most prominent decay channels are @xmath90 and @xmath91 with branching ratios approximately 60% and 20% respectively . due to the mixing su(3 ) forbidden decays to decuplet are possible , but small , at the level of 5 to 9% .
mixing induced by @xmath13 was first studied within the @xmath11qsm already in ref . @xcite but only in the leading order in @xmath26 .
it was extended to nonleading terms in ref .
@xcite and @xcite . mixing apears also in other approaches to pentaquarks .
for example in a diquark model @xcite antidecuplet mixes with an accompanying cryptoexotic octet .
diagonalization of strangeness induces _ ideal _ ( large ) mixing between these two representations .
the resulting physical states of nucleon quantum numbers have been interpreted as roper and @xmath92 .
however due to the ideal mixing these two states should have comparable widths @xcite , while experimentally they are differ substantially .
the discussion of masses and decay widths of the @xmath93 states under assumption that they correspond to the roper and @xmath94 done in ref .
@xcite still indicates that it is impossible to match the mass splittings with the observed branching ratios for these two resonances even for arbitrary mixing .
whether any different assignment of the diquark @xmath93 states would be compatible with the decay patterns deserves a separate study . in this short note
we have argued that due to the smallness of the reduced matrix elements of @xmath95 , which is natural in chiral soliton models , mixing with other su(3 ) representations has to be taken into account .
unfortunately , for the time being we can only speculate which mixing scenario is phenomelogically impossible , allowed or desired .
here we have examined a possibility that antidecuplet mixes with the roper octet .
mixing of roper and the ground state octets is presumably very small . indeed
the first order gmo mass formulae work very well for the ground state octet so there is almost no space for additional mixing . * acknowledgements * this paper is based on a common work with maxim polyakov and klaus goeke .
i would like to thank the organizers of the workshop `` excited qcd '' for stimulative and creative atmosphere .
biedenharn and y. dothan , _ monopolar harmonics in su(3)@xmath96 as eigenstates of the skyrme - witten model for baryons _ , e. gotsman and g. tauber ( eds . ) , _ from su(3 ) to gravity _ ,
p. 15 - 34 ; l.c .
biedenharn , y. dothan and a. stern , phys .
b * 146 * , 289 ( 1984 ) . | scepticism discovery exotic baryon @xmath0 collaborations diana leps confirmed original results refer reader to recent experimental reviews assume @xmath1 exists mass equal 1540 mev width @xmath2 mev immediate consequences existence exotic su(3 ) multiplet : @xmath3 antidecuplet contains cryptoexotic nucleon- @xmath4 @xmath5-like states @xmath6 ) interpretation states understood associate with known resonances or postulate new resonances with nucleon @xmath5 quantum numbers approach adopt here assume new narrow nucleon resonance @xmath7 interpret as member of @xmath3 @xmath8 decays satisfy constraints small partial width of @xmath7 to @xmath10 contradicts su(3 ) symmetry relations between decay constants @xmath8 importance of mixing for decays mass spectra of exotic antidecuplet baryons exotic states anticipated by founders quark model arguments raised should be heavy wide chiral soliton models predicted pentaquark masses small 1.51.6 gev ) difficult to accommodate small decay width of @xmath1decaywidths explain small decay width chiral soliton quark model @xmath11qsm sect gmo decay coupling @xmath12 reduced gell - mann okubo gmo mixing nonzero @xmath13 rmixing additional mixing @xmath3 roper octet decay patterns @xmath14 estimate mixing angles predictions members @xmath3 @xmath6 conclusions sect @xcite nonrelativistic formula decay width @xmath16 follows goldberger - treimann relation axial strong decay constants @xmath17 mass decaying baryon @xmath18 mass decay product @xmath19 outgoing meson momentum @xmath20 gammadef few hundreds of mev terms non - leading @xmath21 expansion without mixing decay constant @xmath22 matrix element tensor decay operator @xmath23 baryon wave functions @xmath24@xmath25 sum three contributions different order @xmath21 multiplied by su(3 ) clebsch - gordan coefficients @xmath26 @xcite@xmath29 chiral soliton models specific predictions constants @xmath30 @xcite neglected @xmath31 @xmath32[gtnk[gdnpi inconsistent for @xmath12 @xmath26 enhancement @xmath31 obtained @xmath33:@xmath34 estimating @xmath35 @xmath36 decay width@xmath37 small decay width @xmath1 cancelation gtnk authors nonrelativistic limit @xmath11qsm obtains @xmath38 with @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath11qsm predicts @xmath41 @xmath42 antidecuplet decay constants small @xmath13 corrections perturbation introduces mixing @xcite@xmath43 states mixing constants @xmath44 equal zero isospin @xmath1 mixes with @xmath45 contribute decays mixing final nucleon with @xmath3 @xmath46 modifies decay constant@xmath47 @xmath48 small admixtures proportional to reduced matrix elements@xmath49 important mixing parameters @xmath50 @xmath51 not large neither @xmath52 nor @xmath53 vanish in nonrelativistic limit @xmath1 decay due to mixing realistic model parameters @xmath54 cancelation @xmath55 @xmath56 between terms gtnkmix @xmath12 suppressedmixing affects decay pentaquarks violating relations decay constants @xmath22 @xcite consider @xmath57 mixing @xcite defining@xmath58 extracted from gammadef if @xmath59 known assume @xmath60 mev hence @xmath61 possible express decay constants members antidecuplet measurable physical parameters @xmath62 mixing angle @xmath63 unknown parameter @xmath64 estimated from @xmath11qsm calculations @xmath65 @xcite@xmath66 interpret @xmath7 as @xmath8 satisfy bounds difficult possible nullify @xmath67 mixing angle @xmath68 mean octet mass before mixing @xmath69 mev wrong@xmath70 mixing angle too small account baryon masses mixing angles @xmath67 dominated by @xmath71 @xmath72 contradiction experimental data @xmath7 satisfy conditions realistic mixing angles considered scenario antidecuplet mix with roper resonance octet mixing angle @xmath73 roper octet gmo mass formulae ground state octet @xcite need additional mixing @xmath74 @xcite roper decay to @xmath75 negligibleroper admixture contributes to @xmath76 other decay modes:@xmath77 @xmath78 comparable with @xmath71 may suppress @xmath67 without changing @xmath79 conditions satisfied in vicinity of line @xmath80 mixing angles reasonable decay widths branching ratio to @xmath75 plotted in fig . to @xmath10 branching ratio of @xmath81 functions of mixing angle @xmath63 line thin vertical lines correspond to limits on mixing angle @xmath63 plot for @xmath82 in fig . plot @xmath67 @xmath83 with different components along line @xmath67 small due to cancellation between @xmath71 and @xmath84 @xmath85 rises moderately when mixing increases solid lines different components defined in eq . by dashed lines plot for @xmath82 established range of mixing angles predict masses of remaining antidecuplet members @xcite:@xmath86 bound contradicts result of na49 @xmath87 mev @xcite total decay width of @xmath15 to @xmath88 @xmath89 of 10 mev width @xmath6 exceed 30 mev constrained 10 mev prominent decay channels are @xmath90 @xmath91 branching ratios 60% 20% mixing su(3 ) forbidden decays to decuplet possible small 5 to 9% mixing induced by @xmath13 studied @xmath11qsm in ref @xcite leading order @xmath26 extended to nonleading terms in @xcite mixing apears in other approaches pentaquarks diquark model @xcite antidecuplet mixes with cryptoexotic octet diagonalization of strangeness induces large mixing resulting physical states nucleon interpreted as roper and @xmath92 states comparable widths experimentally differ substantially discussion of masses decay widths @xmath93 states roper impossible to match mass splittings with branching ratios for arbitrary mixing different assignment diquark @xmath93 states with decay patterns separate study argued smallness reduced matrix elements of @xmath95 natural in chiral soliton models mixing with other su(3 ) representations speculate mixing scenario impossible examined possibility antidecuplet mixes with roper octetmixing roper ground state octets small first order gmo mass formulae work ground state octet no space additional mixing paper common work maxim polyakov klaus goeke organizers workshop excited qcd atmosphere biedenharn dothan monopolar harmonics su(3)@xmath96 skyrme - witten model baryons gotsman tauber su(3 ) gravity p. 15 - 34 biedenharn dothan a. stern phys . b * 146 289 ( 1984 ) | 0.430256 | 2,829 | 1,516 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,791 | sufficient conditions on @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 are determined that will ensure the generalized bessel functions @xmath5 satisfies the subordination @xmath6 . in particular this gives conditions for @xmath7 , @xmath8 to be close - to - convex . also
, conditions for which @xmath9 to be janowski convex , and @xmath10 to be janowski starlike in the unit disk @xmath11 are obtained . | let @xmath12 denote the class of analytic functions @xmath13 defined in the open unit disk @xmath14 normalized by the conditions @xmath15 . if @xmath13 and @xmath16 are analytic in @xmath17 , then @xmath13 is subordinate to @xmath16 , written @xmath18 , if there is an analytic self - map @xmath19 of @xmath17 satisfying @xmath20 and @xmath21 . for @xmath22 ,
let @xmath23 $ ] be the class consisting of normalized analytic functions @xmath24 in @xmath17 satisfying @xmath25 for instance , if @xmath26 , then @xmath27 $ ] is the class of functions @xmath24 satisfying @xmath28 in @xmath17 . the class @xmath29 $ ] of janowski starlike functions @xcite consists of @xmath30 satisfying @xmath31.\ ] ] for @xmath26 , @xmath32:= \mathcal{s}^\ast(\beta)$ ] is the usual class of starlike functions of order @xmath33 ; @xmath34:= \mathcal{s}^\ast_{\beta } = \{f \in \mathcal{a } : @xmath35:=\mathcal{s}^\ast[\beta]= \{f \in \mathcal{a } : been studied , for example , in @xcite .
a function @xmath36 is said to be close - to - convex of order @xmath33 @xcite if @xmath37 for some @xmath38 .
this article studies the generalized beesel function @xmath39 given by the power series @xmath40 where @xmath41 .
the function @xmath42 is analytic in @xmath17 and solution of the differential equation @xmath43 if @xmath3,@xmath2,@xmath4 in @xmath44 , such that @xmath45 and @xmath46 .
this normalized and generalized bessel function of the first kind of order @xmath2 , also satisfy the following recurrence relation @xmath47 which is an useful tool to study several geometric properties of @xmath48 .
there has been several works @xcite studying geometric properties of the function @xmath42 , such as on its close - to - convexity , starlikeness , and convexity , radius of starlikeness and convexity . in section @xmath49 of this paper ,
sufficient conditions on @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath4 , @xmath50 are determined that will ensure @xmath48 satisfies the subordination @xmath51 .
it is to be understood that a computationally - intensive methodology with shrewd manipulations is required to obtain the results in this general framework .
the benefits of such general results are that by judicious choices of the parameters @xmath0 and @xmath1 , they give rise to several interesting applications , which include extending the results of previous works . using this subordination result , sufficient conditions are obtained for @xmath52 $ ] , which next readily gives conditions for @xmath53 to be close - to - convex .
section @xmath54 gives emphasis to the investigation of @xmath42 to be janowski convex as well as of @xmath55 to be janowski starlike .
the following lemma is needed in the sequel .
@xcite[lem : miller - mocanu-1 ] let @xmath56 , and @xmath57 satisfy @xmath58 whenever @xmath59 , @xmath60 real , @xmath61 . if @xmath2 is analytic in @xmath17 with @xmath62 , and @xmath63 for @xmath64 , then @xmath65 in @xmath17 . in the case
@xmath66 , then the condition in lemma @xmath67 generalized to @xmath68 @xmath60 real , @xmath69 and @xmath70 .
in this section , one main result on the close - to - convexity of the generalized bessel function with several consequences are discussed in details .
[ thm :- janw - cc ] let @xmath71 .
suppose @xmath72 , and @xmath4 , @xmath73 satisfy @xmath74 further let @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath50 and @xmath4 satisfy either the inequality @xmath75 whenever @xmath76 or the inequality @xmath77 whenever @xmath78 if @xmath79 , then @xmath80 $ ] .
define the analytic function @xmath81 by @xmath82 then , a computation yields @xmath83 and @xmath84 thus , using the identities @xmath85@xmath86 , the bessel differential equation @xmath87 can be rewrite as @xmath88 assume @xmath89 , and define @xmath90 by @xmath91 it follows from @xmath92 that @xmath93 to ensure @xmath94 for @xmath59 , from lemma @xmath67 , it is enough to establish @xmath95 in @xmath17 for any real @xmath60 , @xmath61 , and @xmath69 .
with @xmath96 in @xmath97 , a computation yields @xmath98 since @xmath61 , and @xmath99 $ ] , @xmath100 thus @xmath101 where @xmath102 condition @xmath103 shows that @xmath104 since @xmath105 for @xmath106 , it is clear that @xmath107 when @xmath108 with @xmath109 .
as @xmath110 , the above condition holds whenever @xmath111 that is , when @xmath112 to establish inequality @xmath113 , consider the polynomial @xmath114 given by @xmath115 where @xmath116 the constraint @xmath117 yields @xmath118 , and thus @xmath119 . now inequality @xmath120 readily implies that @xmath121 now considers the case of the constraint @xmath122 , which is equivalent to @xmath123 .
then the minimum of @xmath114 occurs at @xmath124 , and @xmath125 yields @xmath126 evidently @xmath127 satisfies the hypothesis of lemma @xmath67 , and thus @xmath128 , that is , @xmath129 hence there exists an analytic self - map @xmath19 of @xmath17 with @xmath20 such that @xmath130 which implies that @xmath131 theorem @xmath132 gives rise to simple conditions on @xmath4 and @xmath50 to ensure @xmath42 maps @xmath17 into a half - plane .
[ cor :- janw - cc-1 ] let @xmath133 and @xmath134
. then @xmath135 choose @xmath136 , and @xmath137 in theorem @xmath132 .
then both the conditions @xmath103 and @xmath117 are equivalent to @xmath138 which clearly holds for @xmath139 .
the proof will complete if the hypothesis @xmath120 holds , i.e. , @xmath140 since @xmath141 , it follows that @xmath142 which establishes @xmath143 .
[ cor :- janw - cc-3 ] let @xmath4 , @xmath50 be real such that @xmath144 then @xmath145
. put @xmath146 and @xmath137 in theorem @xmath132 .
the condition @xmath103 reduces to @xmath138 , which holds in all cases .
it is sufficient to establish conditions @xmath117 and @xmath120 , or equivalently , @xmath147 and @xmath148 for the case when @xmath133 , both the inequality @xmath149 and @xmath150 hold as @xmath138 .
finally it is readily established for @xmath151 and @xmath152 that @xmath153 and @xmath154 it is known that for @xmath155 and @xmath156 , the generalized bessel functions @xmath157 and @xmath158 respectively gives the spherical bessel and modified spherical bessel functions .
this specific choice of @xmath3 and @xmath4 , corollary @xmath159 yield @xmath160 for @xmath161 , and @xmath162 , for @xmath163 . since @xmath164 for @xmath165 , following inequalities
can be obtain with the aid of results in @xcite . for @xmath161 ,
the modified spherical bessel functions @xmath166 satisfy the following inequalities .
@xmath167 [ thm : janw - cc-2 ]
let @xmath168 and @xmath4 , @xmath73 satisfy @xmath169 suppose @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath50 and @xmath4 satisfy either the inequality @xmath170 whenever @xmath171 or the inequality @xmath172 whenever @xmath173 if @xmath79 , then @xmath80 $ ] .
first , proceed similar to the proof of theorem @xmath132 and derive the expression of @xmath174 as given in @xmath175 .
now for @xmath61 , @xmath176 , and @xmath177 , @xmath178 and then with @xmath179 , and @xmath180 , it follows that @xmath181 where @xmath182 observe that the inequality @xmath183 implies that @xmath184 .
thus @xmath185 for all @xmath176 provided @xmath186 , that is , for @xmath187 , @xmath188 with @xmath110 , it is enough to show for @xmath189 , @xmath190 which is equivalent to @xmath191 where @xmath192 if @xmath193 holds , then @xmath194 .
since @xmath195 is increasing , then @xmath196 , which is nonnegative from @xmath197 .
on the other hand , if @xmath198 holds , then @xmath199 , @xmath200 , and @xmath201 implies @xmath202 .
either case establishes @xmath203 .
[ thm :- janw - cc-3 ] let @xmath71 .
suppose @xmath72 , @xmath204 with @xmath8 and satisfying @xmath205 further let @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath50 and @xmath4 satisfy either @xmath206 whenever @xmath207 or the inequality @xmath208 when @xmath209 if @xmath210 , then @xmath211 $ ] .
[ thm :- janw - cc-4 ] let @xmath212 .
suppose @xmath204 , @xmath213 , such that @xmath214 suppose @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath50 and @xmath4 satisfy either @xmath215 whenever @xmath216 or the inequality @xmath217 when @xmath218 if @xmath210 , then @xmath211 $ ] .
let @xmath219 , and @xmath220 then @xmath221 is close - to - convex of order @xmath222 with respect to the identity function .
let @xmath4 be a nonzero real number , and @xmath223 .
this section contributes to find conditions to ensure a normalized and generalized bessel functions @xmath225 in the class of janowski starlike functions . for this purpose ,
first sufficient conditions for @xmath42 to be janowski convex is determined , and then an application of relation @xmath226 yields conditions for @xmath227.$ ] define an analytic function @xmath235 by @xmath236 then @xmath237 and @xmath238 a rearrangement of @xmath239 yields @xmath240 thus , @xmath241 now a differentiation of @xmath87 leads to @xmath242 which give @xmath243 using @xmath244 and @xmath245 , @xmath246 yields @xmath247 equivalently @xmath248 for @xmath255 , @xmath176 , @xmath256 note that condition @xmath257 implies @xmath258 . in this case
, @xmath259 has a maximum at @xmath260 .
thus @xmath261 for all real @xmath60 provided @xmath262 since @xmath110 , it is left to show that @xmath263 @xmath189 . the above inequality is equivalent to @xmath264 where @xmath265 thus @xmath127 satisfies the hypothesis of lemma @xmath67 , and hence @xmath128 , or equivalently @xmath270 by definition of subordination , there exists an analytic self - map @xmath19 of @xmath17 with @xmath20 and @xmath271 a simple computation shows that @xmath272 and hence @xmath273 | @xmath12 analytic functions @xmath13 open unit disk @xmath14 normalized conditions @xmath15 @xmath13 analytic @xmath17 subordinate @xmath16 @xmath18 analytic self - map @xmath19 @xmath17 satisfying @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 class normalized functions @xmath24 @xmath17 satisfying @xmath25 @xmath27 class functions @xmath24 satisfying @xmath28 @xmath17 @xmath29 janowski starlike functions @xmath30 satisfying @xmath31 @xmath26 @xmath32\mathcal\ast\beta class starlike functions @xmath33 @xmath34\mathcal @xmath35\mathcal\beta @xcite function @xmath36 close - - convex order @xmath33 @xmath37 @xmath38 studies generalized beesel function @xmath39 power series @xmath40 @xmath41 function @xmath42 analytic @xmath17 solution differential equation @xmath43 @xmath3@xmath4 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46normalized generalized bessel function @xmath2 satisfy recurrence relation @xmath47 useful tool study geometric properties @xmath48 works studying geometric properties function @xmath42 close - to - convexity starlikeness radius section @xmath49 conditions @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath50 ensure @xmath48 satisfies subordination @xmath51 computationally - intensive methodology shrewd manipulations required results benefits results judicious choices parameters @xmath0 @xmath1 interesting applications extending results previous works subordination result conditions obtained @xmath52 conditions @xmath53 close - to - convex section @xmath54 investigation @xmath42 janowski convex @xmath55 janowski starlike lemma needed sequel @xcite[lem miller - mocanu-1 @xmath56 @xmath57 satisfy @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath2 analytic @xmath17 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath17 @xmath66 condition lemma @xmath67 generalized @xmath68 @xmath60 real @xmath69 @xmath70section result close - to - convexity generalized bessel function consequences discussed @xmath71 @xmath72 satisfy @xmath74 @xmath0 satisfy inequality @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath80 define analytic function @xmath81 @xmath82 computation yields @xmath83 @xmath84 identities @xmath85@xmath86 bessel differential equation @xmath87 rewrite @xmath88 @xmath89 define @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath93 ensure @xmath94 @xmath59 establish @xmath95 @xmath17 @xmath60 @xmath69 @xmath96 @xmath97 computation yields @xmath98 @xmath61 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 condition @xmath103 shows @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath109 condition holds @xmath111 @xmath112 establish inequality @xmath113 consider polynomial @xmath114 @xmath115 constraint @xmath117 yields @xmath118 @xmath119inequality @xmath120 implies @xmath121 constraint @xmath122 equivalent @xmath123 minimum @xmath114 @xmath124 @xmath125 yields @xmath126 @xmath127 satisfies hypothesis @xmath67 @xmath128 analytic self - map @xmath19 @xmath17 @xmath20 @xmath130 implies @xmath131 @xmath132 conditions @xmath4 @xmath50 @xmath42 maps @xmath17 half - plane @xmath133 @xmath134 @xmath135 choose @xmath136 @xmath137 @xmath132 conditions @xmath103 @xmath117 equivalent @xmath138 @xmath139 proof hypothesis @xmath120 holds @xmath140 @xmath141 follows @xmath142 establishes @xmath143 @xmath4 @xmath50 @xmath144 @xmath145 @xmath146 @xmath137 theorem @xmath132 condition @xmath103 reduces to @xmath138 holds establish conditions @xmath117 @xmath120 @xmath147 @xmath148 inequality @xmath149 @xmath150 hold @xmath138established @xmath151 @xmath155 generalized bessel functions @xmath157 spherical modified spherical bessel functions choice @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath159 yield @xmath160 @xmath161 @xmath162 @xmath163 @xmath164 @xmath165 inequalities results @xcite @xmath161 modified spherical bessel functions @xmath166 satisfy inequalities @xmath167 @xmath168 @xmath4 @xmath73 satisfy @xmath169 @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath50 @xmath4 satisfy inequality @xmath170 @xmath171 inequality @xmath172 @xmath173 @xmath80 proceed proof theorem @xmath132 derive expression @xmath174 @xmath175 @xmath61 @xmath176 @xmath177 @xmath178 @xmath179 @xmath180 @xmath181 @xmath182 inequality @xmath183 implies @xmath184 @xmath185 @xmath176 @xmath186 @xmath187 @xmath188 @xmath110 show @xmath189 @xmath190 equivalent to @xmath191 @xmath192 @xmath193 holds @xmath194@xmath195 increasing @xmath196 nonnegative from @xmath197 @xmath198 holds @xmath199 @xmath201 implies @xmath202 establishes @xmath203 @xmath71 suppose @xmath72 @xmath204 @xmath8 satisfying @xmath205 @xmath0 satisfy @xmath206 @xmath207 or inequality @xmath208 @xmath209 @xmath210 @xmath211 @xmath212 suppose @xmath204 @xmath213 @xmath214 satisfy @xmath215 @xmath216 or inequality @xmath217 @xmath218 @xmath210 @xmath211 @xmath219 @xmath220 @xmath221 close - to - convex @xmath222 identity function @xmath4 nonzero real number @xmath223 contributes conditions normalized generalized bessel functions @xmath225 class janowski starlike functions sufficient conditions for @xmath42 janowski convex determined application relation @xmath226 yields conditions for @xmath227define analytic function @xmath235 rearrangement @xmath239 yields @xmath240 @xmath241 differentiation @xmath87 leads @xmath242 @xmath243 @xmath246 yields @xmath247 @xmath248 @xmath255 @xmath257 implies @xmath258 @xmath259 maximum @xmath260 @xmath261 @xmath60 @xmath262 @xmath110 show @xmath263 @xmath189 inequality equivalent @xmath264 @xmath265 @xmath127 satisfies hypothesis lemma @xmath67 @xmath128 @xmath270 self - map @xmath19 @xmath17 @xmath20 @xmath271 computation shows @xmath272 @xmath273 | 0.423837 | 2,792 | 1,593 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,795 | we present the results of a _ spitzer _ search for obscured agn in the _ chandra _ deep field - north , using both radio - excess and mid - infrared power - law selection .
agn selected via the former technique tend to lie at @xmath0 , have seds dominated by the 1.6 stellar bump , and have seyfert - like x - ray luminosities ( when detected in the x - ray ) . in contrast , the irac ( 3.6 - 8.0 ) power - law selected agn lie at higher redshifts of @xmath1 , and comprise a significant fraction of the most x - ray luminous agn in the cdf - n . while there is almost no overlap in the agn samples selected via these two methods , their x - ray detection fractions are very similar .
only 40% and 55% of the radio - excess and power - law samples are detected in the 2 ms x - ray catalog , respectively . the majority of the agn selected via both methods are consistent with being obscured ( @xmath2 @xmath3 ) , but not compton - thick ( @xmath4 @xmath3 ) , although compton - thick candidates exist in both samples .
we place an upper limit of @xmath5% ( or @xmath6 ) on the obscured fraction of the power - law sample , consistent with predictions from the cosmic x - ray background .
the sources selected via the power - law criteria comprise a subset of agn selected via other irac color - color cuts . while smaller in number than the color - selected samples in the deep fields , the power - law sample suffers from less contamination by star - forming galaxies . | defining complete samples of agn , both locally and in the distant cosmological fields , has been a major ongoing goal of agn research .
hard x - ray selection is generally considered the best way to detect both relatively uncontaminated and complete samples of agn . at high column densities
, however , the dust and gas surrounding the central engine ( in combination with that located in the host galaxy ) are capable of hiding virtually all accessible agn tracers . therefore , while the overall resolved fraction of the cosmic x - ray background ( cxrb ) is high , it drops with increasing energy to 60% at 6 - 8 kev and to 50% at @xmath7 8 kev @xcite . population synthesis models of the cxrb therefore predict a significant population of heavily obscured agn not detected in the deepest x - ray fields . for instance , @xcite predict that current x - ray catalogs are 25% incomplete at @xmath8 @xmath3 and 70% incomplete at @xmath9 @xmath3 .
numerous attempts have been made to detect this population of heavily obscured agn , many of which have focused on the mid - infrared ( mir ) emission where the obscured radiation is re - emitted or on combinations of mir and multi - wavelength data .
we focus here on two selection techniques independent of the optical and x - ray properties of the agn : radio - excess and mir power - law selection .
the former selects agn
whose radio emission far exceeds that of the radio - infrared correlation for star - forming galaxies , whereas the latter selects agn whose irac seds exhibit the characteristic power - law emission expected of luminous agn ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ) . by focusing on the infrared and radio , wavebands where dust obscuration is minimal
, we can select both unobscured agn as well as heavily obscured agn likely to be missed in the uv , optical , and soft x - ray bands . to test the x - ray properties of the _ spitzer_-selected agn samples , we focus on the cdf - n , the deepest x - ray field observed to date .
_ spitzer _ mips and irac images with exposures of 1400 s and 500 s , respectively , cover the full area of the _ chandra _ 2 ms field , as does the deep 1.4 ghz radio data of @xcite .
optical and near - infrared imaging and photometry are available from the goods dataset @xcite as well as from the data of @xcite ( _ ubvrizhk _ ) .
we assume a cosmology of ( @xmath10,@xmath11)=(0.3 , 0.7 , 72 km s@xmath12 mpc@xmath12 ) .
we use the well - known radio - infrared relation of star - forming galaxies and radio - quiet agn , to select a sample of radio - excess agn . @xcite
define @xmath13 = log ( f@xmath14/f@xmath15 ) . for star - forming galaxies ,
@xmath13 is tightly constrained out to z @xmath16
1@xmath17 @xmath13 = 0.94 @xmath18 0.23 after k - correction @xcite . galaxies with values of @xmath13
well below this range ( strong radio with respect to 24 emission ) are unlikely to be dominated by star formation and instead are radio - emitting agn ( e.g. * ? ? ?
we therefore set a selection threshold of @xmath19 to classify a galaxy as probably having an agn and require a _
chandra _ exposure of @xmath7 1 ms to provide high x - ray sensitivity .
this selection identifies 27 radio - excess agn in the cdfn @xcite .
the radio - excess agn lie at the typical redshift of x - ray sources in the cdf - n , @xmath0 , and ( when detected in the x - ray ) tend to have x - ray luminosities typical of seyfert galaxies and seds dominated by the 1.6 stellar bump .
approximately 60% of these radio - excess agn , however , are x - ray undetected in the 2 ms _ chandra _ catalog , even at exposures of @xmath20 1 ms ; 25% lack even 2@xmath21 x - ray detections .
the absorbing columns to the faint x - ray - detected objects are @xmath22 @xmath23 n@xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath3 , i.e. , they are obscured but unlikely to be compton thick .
of the 9 agn that are either x - ray non - detected or are too close to a known x - ray source to search for weak x - ray emission , we estimate that 6 could be compton thick .
this corresponds to 22% of our sample and is consistent with predictions from the x - ray background .
in the mir , luminous agn can often be distinguished by their characteristic power - law emission , which extends from the infrared to the ultraviolet ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
this emission is not necessarily due to a single source , but can arise from the combination of non - thermal nuclear emission and thermal emission from various nuclear dust components ( e.g. * ? ? ?
@xcite selected a sample of 92 such sources in the cdf - s , 70% of which are hyper - luminous infrared galaxies ( hyperlirgs , log l@xmath26(l@xmath27)@xmath28 ) or ultra - luminous infrared galaxies ( ulirgs , log l@xmath26(l@xmath27)@xmath29 ) . nearly half ( 47% ) of their power - law sample were undetected in x - rays at exposures of up to 1 ms .
we use a selection similar to that of @xcite to identify a sample of 62 high @xmath30 , red ( @xmath31 , where @xmath32 ) irac power - law galaxies in the 2 ms cdf - n @xcite . of the 62 power - law galaxies , only 34 ( 55% ) have x - ray counterparts in the 2 ms cdf - n x - ray catalog @xcite , consistent with the findings of @xcite , although 85% show evidence for x - ray emission at the @xmath33 detection level .
while the power - law galaxies comprise only @xmath34% of the x - ray and mir - detected agn in the cdf - n , they make up a significant fraction of the high redshift ( @xmath1 ) and high luminosity x - ray agn sample , as is demonstrated in fig .
this is not surprising , as the power - law selection requires the agn to be energetically dominant , and therefore preferentially selects the most luminous agn .
to illustrate the effect of x - ray luminosity on the agn contribution to the optical through mir continuum , we also plot in fig .
1 the median rest - frame optical - mir seds of the x - ray detected members of the comparison sample , as a function of x - ray luminosity .
the comparison sample consists of the 1420 irac sources in the cdf - n that meet our @xmath30 and x - ray exposure cuts .
low - luminosity x - ray sources are dominated by the stellar bump in the optical - nir bands ( e.g. * ? ? ?
the strength of this feature decreases with increasing x - ray luminosity , and disappears almost entirely at luminosities of log @xmath35(ergs s@xmath12)@xmath36 , where the sed takes on the characteristic power - law shape . the obscured fraction ( @xmath2 @xmath3 ) of the x - ray detected power - law galaxies is @xmath16 68% , in agreement with that of @xcite for agn at similar redshifts .
if we consider only those power - law galaxies in the x - ray catalog , we therefore derive an obscured to unobscured ratio of @xmath16 2:1 . adding the 10 weakly - detected power - law galaxies , all of which are likely to be obscured , we calculate an obscured fraction of @xmath16 75% . if we further include the power - law galaxies not detected in x - rays , assuming that all are obscured , the maximum obscured ratio of power - law galaxies rises to @xmath37 4:1 - 5:1 ( 82% )
power - law galaxies detected to high @xmath30 in the irac bands account for at most @xmath38% of both the mir - detected agn and the mir - detected obscured agn predicted by the x - ray luminosity function synthesis models of @xcite down to 24 flux densities of @xmath39 @xmath40jy .
the majority of obscured agn should therefore have seds dominated by the host galaxy , or red power - law seds that fall below the irac detection limit .
we plot in fig .
2 the position of the power - law galaxies with respect to the irac agn color cuts of @xcite and @xcite , designed for relatively shallow surveys .
all of the power - law galaxies lie within both the lacy et al . and stern et al . color regions , and as such
, they comprise a subset of the color - selected mir sources . while the color - selected agn samples in the cdf - n comprise a higher fraction of high - luminosity agn than the power - law selected sample ( see fig .
1 ) , they also appear to suffer from a higher degree of contamination from star - forming galaxies ( see table 1 ) .
this is not surprising , given the behavior of the star - forming and agn templates shown in fig .
2 ( available in * ? ? ?
the star - forming templates enter the agn selection regions at both low and high redshifts , whereas they fall outside of the more stringent power - law region at @xmath41 .
lccc selection criteria & power - law & stern et al .
& lacy et al .
+ number & 62 & 216 & 393 + detected in x - rays & 55% & 38% & 25% + detected at 24 & @xmath792% & 83% & 72% + l@xmath42 w hz@xmath12 & 88% & 54% & 49% + quiescent optical / x - ray colors & @xmath43 & @xmath44 & @xmath45 +
we present the results of a _ spitzer _ search for agn in the _ chandra _ deep field - north .
we focus on two selection techniques independent of the optical and x - ray properties of the sources .
the first is radio - excess selection , in which we select sources whose radio emission far exceeds that of the radio - infrared correlation . in the cdf - n ,
we detect 27 radio - excess agn .
these sources tend to lie at @xmath0 and have seds dominated by the 1.6 stellar bump .
only 40% are detected in the x - ray at exposures of @xmath46 ms , although 75% show signs of x - ray emission at the @xmath47 detection level .
those with x - ray counterparts have seyfert - like x - ray luminosities .
the majority of the radio - excess agn are consistent with being obscured ( @xmath2 @xmath3 ) , and 20% are potentially compton - thick .
the second selection technique is mir power - law selection , in which we select sources with red ( @xmath48 ) irac power - law seds .
the sources selected in this way tend have higher redshifts ( @xmath1 ) and x - ray luminosities than the radio - excess sample .
the irac power - law selection recovers a significant fraction of the most x - ray luminous agn in the cdf - n . despite this , only 55% of the power - law galaxies are detected in the x - ray , with 15% remaining undetected down to the @xmath49 detection level .
these x - ray detection fractions are similar to those of the radio - excess agn , even though there is almost no overlap in the two samples .
this suggests that a relatively low x - ray detection rate may be a common feature for agn samples selected independently of their optical and x - ray properties , regardless of luminosity or redshift .
a study of the intrinsic obscuration of the power - law galaxies suggests that as many as 82% ( 4:1 - 5:1 ) are obscured .
the number densities of these sources indicate that the power - law sample comprises only 20 - 30% of the mips - detected obscured agn population .
the remaining agn are likely to have seds dominated by the host galaxy , like those of the radio - excess sample .
the power - law galaxies discussed here comprise a subset of agn selected via the irac color - selection criteria of @xcite and @xcite . while larger in number than the power - law sample , the color - selected samples in the cdf - n appear to suffer from a higher degree of contamination from star - forming galaxies . by applying additional sed constraints to a color - selected sample , or by requiring either a 24 detection or agn - like optical / x - ray colors
, one can create both a more complete and reliable sample of mir - selected agn , even in the deepest astronomical fields .
doing so is crucial if we are to constrain the fraction of heavily obscured agn in the distant universe and determine their contribution to the accretion history of the universe . | defining samples agn locally distant major goal research hard x - ray selection best detect uncontaminated complete samples agn high column densities dust gas central engine host galaxy agn tracers resolved fraction cosmic x - ray background cxrb high drops energy to 60% at 6 - 8 kev 50% at @xmath7 8 kev @xcite population synthesis models predict population heavily obscured agn not detected in deepest x - ray fields current x - ray catalogs 25% incomplete at @xmath8 @xmath3 70% incomplete at @xmath9 @xmath3 attempts to detect obscured agn focused on mid - infrared ) emission combinations mir multi - wavelength data focus on two selection techniques radio - excess mir power - law selection former selects agn radio emission exceeds radio - infrared correlation galaxies latter selects agn exhibit characteristic power - law emission focusing on infrared radio wavebands where dust obscuration minimal select unobscured heavily obscured agn likely missed in uv optical soft x - ray bandstest x - ray properties spitzer-selected agn samples focus cdf - n deepest x - ray field spitzer mips irac images exposures 1400 500 s cover full area chandra 2 ms field 1.4 ghz radio data @xcite optical near - infrared imaging photometry goods dataset @xcite data assume cosmology @xmath10,@xmath11)=(0.3 0.7 72 km s@xmath12 use radio - infrared relation star - forming galaxies radio - quiet agn select sample radio - excess agn @xmath13 = log f@xmath14/f@xmath15 ) galaxies @xmath13 constrained @xmath16@xmath17 = 0.94 @xmath18 0.23 after k - correction galaxies values @xmath13 below range unlikely dominated star formation radio - emitting agn selection threshold @xmath19 galaxy agn chandra exposure @xmath7 1 ms high x - ray sensitivity selection identifies 27 radio - excess agn cdfn @xcite typical redshift x - ray sources cdf - n luminosities typical seyfert galaxies dominated 1.6 stellar bump60% radio - excess agn x - ray undetected in 2 ms chandra catalog at exposures @xmath20 1 ms 25% lack 2@xmath21 x - ray detections absorbing columns to faint x - ray - detected objects @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath3 obscured unlikely compton thick 9 agn x - ray non - detected or too close to x - ray source 6 could be compton thick 22% sample consistent with predictions x - ray background luminous agn distinguished by power - law emission extends infrared to ultraviolet emission not single source non - thermal nuclear emission thermal emission nuclear dust components selected sample 92 sources 70% hyper - luminous infrared galaxies or ultra - luminous infrared galaxies half 47% ) power - law sample undetected in x - rays at exposures up to 1 ms selection similar identify sample 62 high @xmath30 power - law galaxies in 2 ms cdf - n @xcite62 power - law galaxies 34 55% have x - ray counterparts in 2 ms cdf - n x - ray catalog @xcite consistent 85% x - ray emission at @xmath33 detection level power - law galaxies @xmath34% x - ray mir - detected agn cdf - n significant fraction high redshift luminosity x - ray agn sample fig power - law selection requires dominant selects luminous agn effect x - ray luminosity median rest - frame optical - mir seds x - ray members comparison sample function x - ray luminosity sample 1420 irac sources - @xmath30 x - ray exposure cuts low - luminosity x - ray sources dominated by stellar bump optical - nir bands strength decreases luminosity disappears at luminosities @xmath35@xmath36 power - law shape obscured fraction @xmath3 x - ray detected power - law galaxies is @xmath16 68% agreement with @xcite at similar redshifts obscured to unobscured ratio of @xmath16 2:110 weakly - detected power - law galaxies likely obscured calculate obscured fraction @xmath16 75% galaxies not detected x - rays maximum obscured ratio to @xmath37 4:1 - 5:1 ( 82% ) galaxies detected to high @xmath30 irac bands account @xmath38% mir - detected agn obscured agn - @xcite to 24 flux densities @xmath39 @xmath40jy majority obscured agn seds dominated by host galaxy red power - law below irac detection limit fig . 2 position power - law galaxies irac agn color cuts @xcite - galaxies within lacy et al . stern et al . color regions comprise subset color - selected mir sources color - selected agn samples in cdf - n higher fraction high - luminosity agn power - law higher contamination from star - forming galaxies star - forming agn templates fig . 2 templates enter agn selection regions at low high redshifts fall outside stringent power - law region at @xmath41 lccc selection criteria power - law stern lacy number 62 216 393 detected x - rays 55% 38% 25% 24 @xmath792% 83% 72%@xmath42@xmath12 88% 54% 49% quiescent optical x - ray colors @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 results spitzer search agn chandra deep field - north focus two selection techniques x - ray first radio - excess selection radio emission exceeds radio - infrared correlation cdf - n 27 radio - excess agn sources @xmath0 dominated 1.6 stellar bump 40% detected x - ray @xmath46 ms 75% x - ray emission @xmath47 level x - ray counterparts seyfert - like x - ray luminosities majority obscured @xmath2 @xmath3 20% potentially compton - thick second mir power - law selection sources red @xmath48 ) irac power - law seds higher redshifts x - ray luminosities recovers most x - ray luminous agn n 55% power - law galaxies detected x - ray 15% undetected to @xmath49 detection level x - ray detection fractions similar radio - excess agn almost no overlap sampleslow x - ray detection rate common for agn samples regardless luminosity redshift study obscuration power - law galaxies suggests 82% ( 4:1 - 5:1 ) obscured power - law sample 20 - 30% mips - detected obscured agn population remaining likely seds dominated by host galaxy power - law galaxies comprise subset agn selected via irac color - selection criteria @xcite @xcite larger color - selected samples in cdf - n suffer higher contamination from star - forming galaxies applying additional sed constraints color - sample requiring 24 detection or agn - like optical / x - ray colors create complete reliable sample mir - selected agn crucial constrain heavily obscured agn universe determine contribution to accretion history | 0.441983 | 3,004 | 1,524 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,797 | schur studied limits of the arithmetic means @xmath0 of zeros for polynomials of degree @xmath1 with integer coefficients and simple zeros in the closed unit disk .
if the leading coefficients are bounded , schur proved that @xmath2 we show that @xmath3 , and estimate the rate of convergence by generalizing the erds - turn theorem on the distribution of zeros . _ to cite this article : i. e. pritsker , c. r. acad .
sci .
paris , ser .
i 336 ( 2003 ) .
_ 0.5 * rsum * 0.5*moyennes de nombres algbriques dans le disque unit . * schur a tudi les limites des moyennes arithmtiques @xmath0 des zros pour les polynmes coefficients entiers de degr @xmath1 ayant des zros simples dans le disque unit ferm .
lorsque les coefficients dominants restent borns , schur a dmontr que @xmath4 .
nous prouvons que @xmath3 .
nous donnons une estimation du taux de convergence , gr@xmath5ce une gnralisation dun thorme de erds - turn sur la distribution des zros . _
pour citer cet article : i. e. pritsker , c. r. acad .
sci .
paris , ser .
i 336 ( 2003 ) . | let @xmath6 be the set of polynomials of degree @xmath1 with integer coefficients and all zeros in the closed unit disk @xmath7 .
we denote the subset of @xmath6 with simple zeros by @xmath8 . given @xmath9 , we write @xmath10 if @xmath11 and @xmath12 ( respectively @xmath13 if @xmath11 and @xmath14 ) .
schur @xcite studied the limiting behavior of the arithmetic means @xmath0 of zeros for polynomials from @xmath15 as @xmath16 where @xmath9 is an arbitrary fixed number .
he showed that @xmath17 and remarked that this @xmath18 is equal to @xmath19 for _ monic _ polynomials from @xmath6 by kronecker s theorem @xcite .
we prove that @xmath20 for any sequence of polynomials from schur s class @xmath21 this result is obtained as a consequence of the asymptotic equidistribution of zeros near the unit circle .
namely , if @xmath22 are the zeros of @xmath23 , we define the counting measure @xmath24 , where @xmath25 is the unit point mass at @xmath26 .
consider the normalized arclength measure @xmath27 on the unit circumference @xmath28 , with @xmath29 if the @xmath30 converge weakly to @xmath27 as @xmath31 ( @xmath32 ) then @xmath33 thus schur s problem is solved by the following result .
[ thm1.1 ] if @xmath34 satisfy @xmath35 , then @xmath32 as @xmath36 ideas on the equidistribution of zeros date back to jentzsch and szeg , cf .
they were developed further by erds and turn @xcite , and many others ; see @xcite for history and additional references .
more recently , this topic received renewed attention in number theory , e.g. in the work of bilu @xcite .
if the leading coefficients of polynomials are bounded , then we can allow even certain multiple zeros .
define the multiplicity of an irreducible factor @xmath37 of @xmath23 as the integer @xmath38 such that @xmath39 divides @xmath23 , but @xmath40 does not divide @xmath23 . if a factor @xmath37 occurs infinitely often in a sequence @xmath41 then @xmath42 means @xmath43 if @xmath37 is present only in finitely many @xmath23 , then @xmath42 by definition .
[ thm1.2 ] assume that @xmath44 . if every irreducible factor in the sequence of polynomials @xmath23 has multiplicity @xmath45 , then @xmath32 as @xmath36 [ cor1.3 ] if @xmath46 satisfy the assumptions of theorem [ thm1.1 ] or [ thm1.2 ] , then @xmath47 we also show that the norms @xmath48 have at most subexponential growth . [ cor1.4 ] if @xmath41 satisfy the assumptions of theorem [ thm1.1 ] or theorem [ thm1.2 ] , then @xmath49 this result is somewhat unexpected , as we have no direct control of the norm or coefficients ( except for the leading one ) .
for example , @xmath50 has norm @xmath51 .
we now consider quantitative aspects of the convergence @xmath32 . as an application
, we obtain estimates of the convergence rate of @xmath0 to @xmath19 in schur s problem . a classical result on
the distribution of zeros is due to erds and turn @xcite . for @xmath52 with @xmath53 let @xmath54 be the number of zeros in the sector @xmath55 where @xmath56 erds and turn @xcite proved that @xmath57 the constant @xmath58 was improved by ganelius , and @xmath59 was replaced by weaker integral norms by amoroso and mignotte ; see @xcite for more history and references .
our main difficulty in applying to schur s problem is the absence of an effective estimate for @xmath60 .
we prove a new discrepancy " estimate via energy considerations from potential theory .
these ideas originated in part in the work of kleiner , and were developed by sjgren and hsing , see ( * ? ? ?
* ch . 5 ) .
we also use the mahler measure of a polynomial @xmath61 , defined by @xmath62 note that @xmath63 , where @xmath64 .
jensen s formula readily gives @xmath65 @xcite .
hence @xmath66 for any @xmath67 [ thm2.1 ] let @xmath68 satisfy @xmath69 and @xmath70 if @xmath61 is a polynomial with integer coefficients and simple zeros , then @xmath71 this theorem is related to recent results of favre and rivera - letelier @xcite , obtained in a different setting .
choosing @xmath72 appropriately , we obtain an estimate of the means @xmath0 in schur s problem .
[ cor2.2 ] if @xmath73 then @xmath74 we also have an improvement of corollary [ cor1.4 ] for schur s class @xmath15 .
[ cor2.3 ] if @xmath75 then there is some @xmath76 such that @xmath77 as @xmath36 the proof of theorem [ thm2.1 ] gives a result for arbitrary polynomials with simple zeros , and for any continuous @xmath72 with finite dirichlet integral @xmath78=\iint(\phi_x^2 + \phi_y^2)\,da$ ] .
moreover , all arguments may be extended to general sets of logarithmic capacity @xmath79 , e.g. to @xmath80 $ ] .
using the characteristic function @xmath81 , we can prove general discrepancy estimates on arbitrary sets , and obtain an erds - turn - type theorem .
our results have a number of applications to the problems on integer polynomials considered in @xcite .
_ proof of theorem [ thm1.1 ] .
_ observe that the discriminant @xmath82 is an integer , as a symmetric form in the zeros of @xmath23 . since @xmath23 has simple roots ,
we have @xmath83 and @xmath84 using weak compactness , we assume that @xmath85 where @xmath86 is a probability measure on @xmath7 . let @xmath87 since @xmath88 we obtain for the energy of @xmath86 that @xmath89 & : = -\iint \log|x - t|\,d\tau(x)\,d\tau(t ) = \lim_{m\to\infty } \left ( \lim_{n\to\infty } \iint k_m(x , t)\ , d\tau_n(x)\,d\tau_n(t ) \right ) \\ & = \lim_{m\to\infty } \left ( \lim_{n\to\infty } \left ( \frac{1}{n^2 } \sum_{j\neq k } k_m(\alpha_j,\alpha_k ) + \frac{m}{n } \right ) \right ) \le \lim_{m\to\infty } \left ( \liminf_{n\to\infty } \frac{1}{n^2 } \sum_{j\neq k } \log\frac{1}{|\alpha_j-\alpha_k| } \right ) \\ & = \liminf_{n\to\infty } \frac{1}{n^2 } \log\frac{|a_n|^{2n-2}}{\delta(p_n ) } \le \liminf_{n\to\infty } \frac{1}{n^2}\log|a_n|^{2n-2 } = 0.\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus @xmath90\le 0 $ ] . but @xmath91>0 $ ] for any probability measure @xmath92 on @xmath7 , except for @xmath27 @xcite .
hence @xmath93 _ proof of theorem [ thm1.2 ] .
_ let @xmath94 note that for any @xmath95 there are finitely many irreducible factors @xmath37 in the sequence @xmath23 such that @xmath96 where @xmath97 is the zero counting measure for @xmath37 .
indeed , if we have an infinite sequence of such @xmath98 , then @xmath99 , as there are only finitely many @xmath100 of bounded degree .
hence @xmath101 by theorem [ thm1.1 ] .
let the number of such exceptional factors @xmath98 be @xmath102 .
then we have @xmath103 hence @xmath104 and @xmath105 after letting @xmath106 let @xmath120 be the potential of a measure @xmath121 a direct evaluation gives that @xmath122 and @xmath123 @xcite .
consider @xmath124 one computes ( or see @xcite ) that @xmath125 where @xmath126 is the arclength on @xmath127 , and @xmath128 are the inner and the outer normals .
we now use green s identity @xmath129 with @xmath130 and @xmath131 in each component @xmath132 of @xmath133 since @xmath134 in @xmath132 , adding the identities for all @xmath132 , we obtain that @xmath135}\,\sqrt{d[p_{\sigma}]},\ ] ] where @xmath78=\iint(\phi_x^2 + \phi_y^2)\,da$ ] is the dirichlet integral of @xmath136 it is known that @xmath137=2\pi i[\sigma]$ ] ( * ? ? ?
* thm 1.20 ) , where @xmath138=-\iint \log|z - t|\,d\sigma(z)\,d\sigma(t ) = \int p_{\sigma}\,d\sigma$ ] . since @xmath123
, we observe that @xmath139 so that @xmath138=\int p_{\tau_n^r}\,d\tau_n^r - 2\int p_{\mu}\,d\tau_n^r.$ ] further , @xmath140 we also have that @xmath141 we next combine the energy estimates to obtain @xmath142
\le \frac{2}{n}\log m(p_n ) -
\frac{1}{n^2}\log\left|a_n^2 \delta(p_n)\right| - \frac{1}{n}\log{r } + 4r.\ ] ] collecting all estimates , we proceed with @xmath143}\,\sqrt{d[p_{\sigma}]}/(2\pi ) = \omega_{\phi}(r ) + \sqrt{d[\phi]}\,\sqrt{i[\sigma]/(2\pi)}$ ]
. thus we arrive at the main inequality : @xmath144}{2\pi}}\,\left(\frac{2}{n}\log m(p_n ) -
\frac{1}{n^2}\log\left|a_n^2 \delta(p_n)\right| - \frac{1}{n}\log{r } + 4r\right)^{1/2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that @xmath78\le 2\pi r^2 a^2,$ ] as @xmath145 and @xmath146 a.e . in @xmath147
also , @xmath148 since @xmath149 and @xmath150 , we have @xmath151 .
hence follows from by letting @xmath152 _ proof of corollary [ cor2.2 ] . _ since @xmath23 has real coefficients , we have that @xmath153 we let @xmath154 and @xmath155 an elementary computation shows that @xmath156 and @xmath157 for all @xmath158 the mean value theorem gives @xmath159 hence we can use theorem [ thm2.1 ] with @xmath160 and @xmath161 _ proof of corollary [ cor2.3 ] .
_ note that @xmath162 for @xmath163 we let @xmath164 and @xmath165 then @xmath166 and the same estimates hold for @xmath167 hence @xmath78 = o\left(\iint_{|w|\le 1 } |z - w|^{-2 } da(w)\right ) = o\left(\int_{1/n}^1 r^{-1}dr \right ) = o(\log{n}),$ ] and @xmath168 let @xmath169 and use to obtain @xmath170 v. v. andrievskii and h .-
blatt , discrepancy of signed measures and polynomial approximation , springer - verlag , new york , 2002 .
y. bilu , limit distribution of small points on algebraic tori , duke math .
j. 89 ( 1997 ) , 465 - 476 .
p. borwein , computational excursions in analysis and number theory , springer - verlag , new york , 2002 .
p. erds and p. turn , on the distribution of roots of polynomials , ann . math .
51 ( 1950 ) , 105 - 119 .
c. favre and j. rivera - letelier , equidistribution quantitative des points de petite hauteur sur la droite projective , math .
335 ( 2006 ) , 311 - 361 ; corrigendum in math .
( 2007 ) , 799 - 801 .
l. kronecker , zwei stze ber gleichungen mit ganzzahligen cofficienten , j. reine ang .
53 ( 1857 ) , 173 - 175 .
n. s. landkof , foundations of modern potential theory , springer - verlag , new york , 1972 .
e. b. saff and v. totik , logarithmic potentials with external fields , springer - verlag , berlin , 1997 .
i. schur , ber die verteilung der wurzeln bei gewissen algebraischen gleichungen mit ganzzahligen koeffizienten , math .
zeit . 1 ( 1918 ) , 377 - 402 . | @xmath6 polynomials @xmath1 integer coefficients zeros disk @xmath7 denote subset @xmath6 zeros @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath11 @xmath14 schur @xcite studied limiting behavior arithmetic means @xmath0 zeros polynomials @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath9 arbitrary fixed number @xmath17 @xmath18 equal @xmath19 polynomials @xmath6 kronecker s theorem @xcite prove @xmath20 polynomials schur s class @xmath21 asymptotic equidistribution zeros near unit circle @xmath22 zeros @xmath23 define counting measure @xmath24 @xmath25 unit point mass @xmath26 normalized arclength measure @xmath27 unit circumference @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 converge @xmath27 @xmath31 @xmath33 schur s problem solved result @xmath34 satisfy @xmath35 @xmath32 @xmath36 ideas equidistribution zeros jentzsch szeg developed erds turn @xcite topic attention number theory work bilu @xciteleading coefficients polynomials bounded allow multiple zeros define multiplicity irreducible factor @xmath37 of @xmath23 as integer @xmath38 @xmath39 divides @xmath23 @xmath40 divide factor @xmath37 occurs often in sequence @xmath41 @xmath42 means @xmath43 @xmath37 present in many @xmath23 @xmath42 assume @xmath44 irreducible factor sequence @xmath23 has multiplicity @xmath45 @xmath32 @xmath36 @xmath46 satisfy assumptions or @xmath47 norms @xmath48 subexponential growth @xmath41 @xmath49 result unexpected no direct control norm coefficients leading one @xmath50 has norm @xmath51 consider quantitative aspects convergence @xmath32 obtain estimates convergence rate @xmath0 to @xmath19 schur s problem classical result distribution zeros due to erds turn @xcite @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 be number of zeros sector @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 constant @xmath58 improved by ganelius @xmath59 replaced by weaker integral norms amoroso mignotte seedifficulty schur s problem effective estimate @xmath60 prove new discrepancy estimate via energy considerations potential theory ideas originated kleiner developed by sjgren hsing use mahler measure polynomial @xmath61 defined @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 jensen s formula gives @xmath65 @xcite @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 satisfy @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath61 polynomial integer coefficients simple zeros @xmath71 related results favre rivera - letelier @xcite choosing @xmath72 obtain estimate means @xmath0 schur s problem @xmath73 @xmath74 improvement corollary schur s class @xmath15 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath36 proof theorem gives result for arbitrary polynomials simple zeros continuous @xmath72 finite dirichlet integral @xmath78=(\phi_x^2 + _y^2) arguments extended to sets logarithmic capacity @xmath79 @xmath80 using characteristic function @xmath81 prove discrepancy estimates arbitrary sets obtain erds - turn - type theorem results problems integer polynomials @xciteproof theorem thm1.1 discriminant @xmath82 integer symmetric form zeros @xmath23 @xmath23 simple roots @xmath83 @xmath84 weak compactness assume @xmath85 @xmath86 probability measure @xmath7 @xmath87 @xmath88 energy @xmath86 @xmath89 \log|x - t|\tau(x)\tau(t ) \lim_{m\to\infty } k_m(x t) d\tau_n(x)\tau_n(t ) \lim_{m\to\infty\frac{1}{n^2 _{j\neq k k_m(\alpha_j,\alpha_k ) \frac{m}{n\lim_{m\to\infty\frac{1}{n^2_{j\neq k\frac{1}\alpha_j-\alpha_k| \liminf_{n\to\infty \frac{1}{n^2\frac{|a_n|^{2n-2}}\delta(p_n )\frac{1}{n^2|a_n|^{2n-2 = 0.{aligned @xmath90 0 $ @xmath91>0 $ probability measure @xmath92 @xmath7 @xmath27 @xcite @xmath93 proof theorem thm1.2 @xmath94 @xmath95 many irreducible factors @xmath37 sequence @xmath23 @xmath96 @xmath97 zero counting measure @xmath37 infinite sequence @xmath98 @xmath99 many @xmath100 bounded degree @xmath101 theorem thm1.1 number exceptional factors @xmath98 @xmath102 @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath120 potential measure @xmath121 evaluation @xmath122 @xmath123 @xcite @xmath124 @xmath125 @xmath126 arclength @xmath127 @xmath128 inner outer normalsuse green identity @xmath129 component @xmath134 adding identities @xmath132 obtain @xmath135\sqrt{d[p_{\sigma} @xmath78=\iint(\phi_x^2 + _y^2) dirichlet integral @xmath136 @xmath137=2\pi[\sigma]$ @xmath138= \sigma(t p_{\sigma}\sigma$ @xmath123 @xmath139 @xmath138= p_{\tau_n^r}_n - 2\int p_{_n^r. @xmath140 @xmath141 combine energy estimates obtain @xmath142 \frac{2}{n}\log - {1}{n^2}\log\left\delta(p_n)\right\frac{1}{n}\log{r 4r collecting estimates proceed @xmath143\sqrt{d[p_{\sigma} = \omega_{\phi}(r ) + \sqrt{d[\phi]}\sqrt{i[\sigma]/(2\pi)}main inequality @xmath144{2{2{n}_n - \frac{1}{n^2}(p_n)\frac{1}{n}\log{r + 4r{1/2}{aligned @xmath78 2\pi r^2 a^2, @xmath145 @xmath146 @xmath147 @xmath148 @xmath149 @xmath150 @xmath151 @xmath152 corollary cor2.2 @xmath23 real coefficients @xmath153 @xmath154 @xmath155 computation @xmath156 @xmath157 @xmath158 mean value theorem gives @xmath159 theorem @xmath160 @xmath161 corollary cor2.3 @xmath162 @xmath163 @xmath164 @xmath165 @xmath166 estimates @xmath167 @xmath78 = o\left( 1 -^{-2\right )\left(_{1/n}^1 r{-1}dr )(\log{n}),$ @xmath168 @xmath169 @xmath170 andrievskii blatt discrepancy signed measures polynomial approximation springer - verlag new york 2002bilu distribution small points algebraic math 89 1997 465 - 476 borwein computational excursions analysis number theory springer verlag new york 2002 erds turn distribution roots polynomials math 51 1950 105 - 119 favre rivera - letelier equidistribution points petite hauteur droite projective math 335 2006 311 - 361 corrigendum 2007 - 801 kronecker gleichungen ganzzahligen 53 1857 173 - 175 landkof foundations modern potential theory springer verlag new york 1972 saff totik logarithmic potentials external fields springer berlin 1997 schur verteilung wurzeln algebraischen gleichungen ganzzahligen koeffizienten math 1 1918 377 - 402 | 0.497548 | 3,198 | 1,801 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,799 | exactly solvable models of linear aggregation have been known since ising s seminal one - dimensional model .
this model is defined by a unique nearest - neighbour bond strength that is independent of the length of the cluster ; known as isodesmic symmetry .
linear aggregation in real systems has often been associated with broken isodesmic symmetry . here
we show that important examples can be mapped to a class of one - dimensional models that are also exactly solvable .
[ [ section ] ] a model has isodesmic symmetry if every member of the infinite set of cluster equilibria @xmath0+[n-1]\leftrightarrow [ n]$ ] define the same equilibrium ` constant ' , as is appropriate to linear aggregation ( self - assembly ) where the energy required to break a chain aggregate is independent of the position of the break and the length of the chain .
the one dimensional ( 1d ) ising @xcite and equivalent lattice - gas ( lg ) models are isodesmic everywhere in phase - space .
we shall consider the generalisation where the first member of the set only , @xmath0+[1]\leftrightarrow [ 2]$ ] , has a different equilibrium constant to all the rest . when treated phenomenologically with the `` law of mass action '' as an implicit solvent model
this is a well - known problem in the physical chemistry of aggregation @xcite and is also the basis of current understanding of the self - assembly of peptide tapes involved in protein miss - folding diseases such as alzheimer s dementia @xcite .
+ let us specify a 1d lg hamiltonian with two energies ; namely , an energy @xmath1 that an isolated monomer @xmath0 $ ] must take up in the process of bonding to a cluster , and an attractive nearest - neighbour energy @xmath2 for each bond within a cluster of length @xmath3 . then
, when a monomer joins a cluster @xmath4 $ ] the change in energy involved is @xmath5 , but when two monomers combine to form a dimer the gain in attractive energy is only @xmath6 .
let us use the exponential factor @xmath7 to represent a temperature field ( @xmath8 denotes inverse temperature in units of boltzmann s constant ) and it is convenient to define @xmath9 .
a direct route to the exact equation of state and cluster distribution is to apply widom s potential distribution theorem ( pdt ) , @xcite : @xmath10 where @xmath11 denotes the monomer activity ( @xmath12 is chemical potential ) , @xmath13 is the density in lg units ( probability of occupancy of a single cell ) , the subscript @xmath14 indicates a conditional average ( there is an empty cell at position @xmath15 enforced by the @xmath16 ) factor on the left side of the equation ) and @xmath17 denotes the change in energy that would arise if a monomer were to be inserted into this empty cell .
the evaluation of this average ( or ratio of partition functions ) can be broken down into insertions into a finite set of specific clusters ; let us use @xmath18 , @xmath19 for occupancy next to an empty cell , @xmath20 , @xmath21 for occupancy next to a monomer isolated on the other side and @xmath22 , @xmath23 for occupancy next to the end of an fixed aggregate ( needed below to evaluate the cluster distribution ) .
figure 1 enumerates all the possibilities required for our model , together with the corresponding values of @xmath17 .
one can then use conditional probability to evaluate ( [ pdt ] ) by inspection ( this can be done in any order but here i shall start at the insertion cell and move right and left ) : @xmath24\right . \nonumber\\ & + & \tau^{\gamma}\left[\rho_w(1-\rho_1)\tau^{1-\gamma}+\rho_w\rho_1\tau\right]^2 \left.\right\ } \,\ , .
\label{eos1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] to evaluate @xmath19 , @xmath21 ( and @xmath23 ) , one simply applies the pdt to insertions in the presence of the fixed clusters at the left of the insertion cells depicted in fig . 2 ;
each case is associated with three non - degenerate states . from fig .
2a we have @xmath25\right\}\\ \,\ , , \label{fw}\ ] ] while from fig .
2b and fig .
2c , respectively , @xmath26 inserting ( [ fw ] ) into ( [ eos1 ] ) leads to a simplification : @xmath27 ^ 2\,\ , .
\label{eos}\ ] ] to evaluate @xmath28 and hence also obtain @xmath29 , @xmath21 and @xmath23 , one can solve ( [ fw]-[f1fa ] ) as a pair of simultaneous equations ; e.g. @xmath30 the solution yields @xmath31 together with a cubic equation of state for @xmath19 : @xmath32 although the general mathematical solution for one - dimensional models is invariably a cubic , for short - range models in equilibrium there must never be more than one physical solution in order to preserve the absence of phase transitions in one - dimension @xcite . for our non - isodesmic model
we see that this arises because ( [ cubic ] ) is also a quadratic for the activity , which only ever has one physical solution : @xmath33 \,\,.\label{soln}\ ] ] in this version of the equation of state the variables @xmath34 and @xmath19 are a field and a density , respectively .
one can transform the equation of state into @xmath35 by using @xmath19 as an implicit variable varying between zero and infinity in both equations ( [ soln ] ) and ( [ eos ] ) .
the occupation variables @xmath21 and @xmath23 similarly follow from ( [ fwf1 ] ) and ( [ fa ] ) , respectively .
note that there is no region of phase space associated with imaginary solutions contained within the above analysis .
+ the entire cluster distribution is also defined by the above occupation probabilities : @xmath36 & = & ( 1-\rho)\rho_w(1-\rho_1 ) \nonumber\\ & = & ( 1-\rho)(1-\rho_w)\rho_a\tau^{-1 } \,\,,\label{one}\\ \left[n>1\right ] & = & ( 1-\rho)\rho_w\rho_1\rho_a^{n-2}(1-\rho_a)\nonumber\\ & = & [ 1]\tau^{-\gamma}\rho_a^{n-1}\,\ , .
\label{cdis}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , i have chosen to build the clusters in strict order of left to right and note that an isolated monomer is actually a cluster of two empty sites enclosing an occupied site .
note also that to obtain the second line of ( [ one ] ) one requires eqn .
( [ f1fw ] ) .
it is straightforward to directly check the self - consistency of the pdt by showing that ( [ eos ] ) is also the solution of the sum rule @xmath37 + \sum_{n>1}\,\,n[n ] \,\ , .
\label{srrho}\ ] ] the clusters @xmath4 $ ] satisfy the isodesmic exponential distribution @xmath4=[1]\tau^{-\gamma}\rho_a^{n-1}$ ] , renormalized by a factor @xmath38 , and thus have an average cluster length @xmath39}{\sum_{n>1}[n ] } = 2+f_a = 2+f_1\tau^{\gamma}\,\ , .
\label{nbar}\ ] ] the only effect of the broken isodesmic symmetry is to cause the aggregation distribution to step down a factor of @xmath38 between isolated monomers ( @xmath40 ) and dimers ( @xmath41 ) . in the case of peptide tape formation ,
the broken isodesmic symmetry ( @xmath42 ) results from the energy barrier that must be overcome by a helical monomer when unwinding in the process of joining a beta - sheet tape .
experimental procedures exist that can directly measure the percentage of peptide in a beta - sheet confirmation , @xcite .
this defines the order parameter @xmath43 = \frac{2f_1+f_1 ^ 2\tau^{\gamma}}{1 + 2f_1+f_1 ^ 2\tau^{\gamma}}\,\ , .
\label{phit}\ ] ] these results are essentially identical to the free - energy minimization proposed by aggeli et al @xcite .
the only mathematical difference is that the lg model has an additional factor of @xmath44 multiplying each cluster probability density @xmath45 $ ] , to allow for arbitrarily high concentration .
from the geometry of typical peptide tapes @xcite one notes that a monomer concentration of @xmath46 molar maps roughly to @xmath47 in lg units . since the experimental data for @xmath48 in fig .
6b of aggeli et al is at concentrations less than 500 micromolar , this factor is completely irrelevant .
accordingly , we have identified an exactly solvable lg model with identical aggregation statistics to a known phenomenological analysis that has been successfully fitted to experimental data .
the data imply a value of @xmath49 around 0.2 .
there is however one physical difference with the free - energy analysis adopted in ref.@xcite ; namely , instead of normalising by the volume of a monomer ( as is automatic in the context of a 1d lg model ) the authors choose a volume approximately 1000 times smaller . from ( [ one],[cdis ] ) this is equivalent to increasing the values of both @xmath34 and @xmath50 by 1000 , which is not sufficiently inconsistent at @xmath51 to noticeably affect the fit to the data .
however , it does result in a significant renormalization of the predicted binding energy @xmath52 associated with the self - assembly .
aggeli et al describe their small volume as characterising the movement of monomers within a tape and thus might be regarded as a rough correction for the entropy cost associated with forming a linear aggregate in a 3d solution , in contrast to a 1d model .
+ by breaking the isodesmic symmetry with a non - zero value of @xmath49 the self - assembly of dimers is suppressed to higher concentrations , after which the rest of the cluster distribution kicks in . this induces a sigmoidal shape to @xmath48 just before the percentage of beta - sheet self - assembly reaches 50% : @xmath53 there is no discontinuous jump in the order parameter @xmath54 ( no van der waals ` loop ' in @xmath55 ) , since as already discussed there is no region of two - phase coexistence for these short - range 1d models .
this behaviour is reminiscent of micelle formation ; since the ` micelles ' are tapes , the concentration at which this rapid increase in linear aggregation takes place can be denoted a ` ctc ' .
it is therefore of some interest that we have identified a class of exactly solvable 1d models that display the phenomenon of a ctc .
these broken isodesmic lg models are defined explicitly by the hamiltonian @xmath56 a non - zero value of @xmath49 is therefore mathematically equivalent to the introduction of a three - body interaction .
99 e. ising , z. physik * 31 * , 253 ( 1925 ) .
r. b. martin , chemical reviews * 96 * , 3043 ( 1996 ) .
one argument is that the self - assembly of a dimer involves twice the loss of orientational entropy than when a monomer joins a cluster .
a. aggeli , m. bell , n. boden , j. n. keen , t. c. b. mcleish , i. nyrkova , s. e. radford and a. semenov , j. mater
. chem .
* 7 * , 1135 ( 1997 ) .
b. widom , j. chem .
phys . * 39 * , 2808 ( 1963 ) . in the current context ( monomer insertion )
this sum rule is best derived from enforcing detailed balance between the system of interest and an ideal - gas reservoir of monomers at the same temperature and chemical potential .
l. d. landau and e. m. lifshitz , _ statistical physics _
3rd ed .
part i , ( pergamon , new york , 1980 ) ; final page . c. whitehouse , j. fang , a. aggeli , m. bell , r. brydson , c. w. g. fishwick , j. r. henderson , c. m. knobler , r. w. owens , n. h. thomson , d. a. smith , and n. boden , angew .
chem .
int . ed .
* 44 * , 1965 ( 2005 ) ; see fig .
2 . | 1 . insertion energies @xmath17 for evaluating the equation of state of a 1d non - isodesmic lg model from the pdt ( [ pdt ] ) .
single - hatched cells denote the constraint that a cell be empty , while double - hatched cells are constrained to be occupied .
the insertion cell is constrained to be empty but is identified by leaving it unshaded .
all remaining cells ( not shown ) have no constraints . factors of 2x arise from 1d symmetry about the insertion cell .
2 . insertion energies @xmath17 required when using the pdt ( [ pdt ] ) to evaluate probabilities of occupancy directly to the right of constrained cells or walls , defining the cluster distribution of a 1d non - isodesmic lg model .
( a ) empty wall : @xmath18 ; ( b ) monomer wall : @xmath20 ; ( c ) cluster wall : @xmath22 .
single - hatched cells denote the constraint that a cell be empty , while double - hatched cells are constrained to be occupied .
the insertion cell is constrained to be empty but is identified by leaving it unshaded .
all remaining cells ( not shown ) have no constraints .
@xmath57 + broken isodesmic symmetry can be an important aspect of linear aggregation in solution .
it is shown that experimental data on the self - assembly of peptide tapes can be mapped to exactly solvable one - dimensional models that incorporate this broken symmetry . | insertion energies @xmath17 evaluating equation state 1d non - isodesmic lg model pdt single - hatched cells denote constraint empty double - hatched cells constrained occupied insertion cell constrained empty identified unshaded remaining cells no constraints factors 2x arise 1d symmetry insertion cell insertion energies @xmath17 pdt evaluate probabilities occupancy constrained cells walls defining cluster distribution 1d non - isodesmic lg model empty wall @xmath18 monomer wall @xmath20 cluster wall @xmath22 single - hatched cells denote constraint empty double - hatched occupied insertion cell constrained empty identified unshaded remaining cells no constraints @xmath57 broken isodesmic symmetry important linear aggregation solution experimental data self - assembly peptide tapes mapped solvable one - dimensional models broken symmetry | 0.071976 | 312 | 160 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,833 | we present the statistical analysis of the properties of gamma - ray bursts with measured host galaxy redshifts and peaked optical light curves in proper frames of reference .
the optical transients are classified by comparing the time lag of the optical peak relative to the grb trigger with the duration of the gamma - ray emission itself .
the results of the correlation analysis of all possible pairs of energy , spectral , and temporal characteristics of both gamma - ray and optical emissions are given .
we specify the pairs of the parameters with correlation coefficients greater than 50% at significance levels better than 1% .
the following empirical relations , obtained for the first time , are specifically discussed : a correlation between the peak optical afterglow @xmath0 band luminosity and redshift @xmath1 and a correlation between the peak luminosity of the prompt optical emissions and the time of the peak @xmath2 .
we also analyze the similarity of the relationships between the peak optical luminosity and the isotropic equivalent of the total energy of gamma - ray bursts for afterglows ( @xmath3 ) and for prompt optical emissions ( @xmath4 ) . | gamma - ray bursts ( grb ) are the brightest transient phenomena in the universe ( the isotropic equivalent of their total energy reaches @xmath5 erg ) . along with actual bursts , variable sources related to them
are also observed in different ranges : radio , infrared , optical , and x - ray .
they are less intensive but powerful enough , with luminosities reaching @xmath6 ergs@xmath7 .
a division of all these manifestations into two types of transients is generally accepted : emission synchronous with gamma - ray ( prompt ) , continuing at least until @xmath8 ( the time till which 90% of the gamma - ray burst energy is released ) , and the afterglows , usually starting after the burst turns off .
the most popular description of their population is a model which combines the inner and outer shock waves produced while the fragments of the relativistic outflow decelerate due to the collisions inside of it ( prompt ) and while it decelerates in the outer interstellar medium ( afterglow ) @xcite .
most of the studies are devoted to examining the properties of individual gamma - ray bursts and to attempts of verification of phenomenon models in general .
as time has shown , in this approach its self - consistent physical picture is far from being constructed , especially for the optical components of the bursts .
it is still unclear whether there occur reverse shock waves , what energy structure does a relativistic jet have , what is the density distribution in the ambient interstellar medium surrounding the burst , etc . in these circumstances ,
the search for statistical relationships between various parameters of bursts in their subsamples formed according to various criteria and with the minimal use of model representations remains a topical task . in its context
, a particularly important role has the analysis of the properties of the sample of gamma - ray bursts with measured redshifts , numbering about 250 objects @xcite .
this amount of data allows us to perform a statistical analysis of the parameters of gamma - ray bursts in the proper frame of reference , revealing empirical relations between intrinsic physical characteristics @xcite . at the same time ,
similar relations are also analyzed for the optical components of the bursts @xcite , the host galaxies @xcite , and the characteristics of the local interstellar medium in the grb progenitors @xcite .
the main problem of all such studies is to find an optimum ratio between the object selection criteria and the sample size : the latter decreases for a more rigorous selection , and subsequently the significance of established statistical dependences falls , while the role of selection effects increases .
we study the correlations between the parameters of grbs with measured redshifts and peaked optical light curves .
the latter condition isolates a specific physical condition within any given model : deceleration of either the ejecta colliding inside the jet in the case of prompt optical emissions or the ejected matter in the outer interstellar medium .
notice that it is not known in advance which kind of physical processes would determine the occurrence of this peak .
the division of objects into subsamples was carried out by comparing the time interval between the beginning of the optical brightness increase and the time of the trigger with the duration of the gamma - ray emission itself ( prompt optical emissions , afterglows , and afterglows accompanied by residual gamma - ray radiation ) , while the identification of the physical type of optical emissions ( prompt or afterglow ) stems from the statistical analysis of the entire subsample .
this way , some objects , initially classified as the prompt optical emissions were subsequently found to be close to the afterglows by their statistical properties . notice that the use of a sample of grbs with known redshifts for the statistical analysis allows us to pose the problem of the cosmological evolution of the properties of both the bursts themselves and the interstellar medium in the region of their localization .
section 2 of this paper gives the definitions and techniques of obtaining different characteristics of the objects , and describes the methods of statistical analysis of the initial data and the obtained results .
sections 3 , 4 , 5 discuss some of the most important correlations between the grb parameters we found : the relationship between the optical luminosity at the light curve peaks and the redshift , between the optical luminosity and the burst energy in the gamma - ray range , and between the luminosity and the time of the peak .
section 6 briefly summarizes the results obtained .
fifty - four gamma - ray bursts with known redshifts and peaked optical light curves were selected for the analysis .
the time dependences of the detected radiation flux both in the gamma - ray and optical ( in stellar magnitudes ) ranges served as the data sources for determining grb parameters . in the latter case , these are , as a rule , the light curves in the @xmath0 band , @xmath9 , sometimes with modified filters , @xmath10 , @xmath11 , and @xmath12 , in one case in the @xmath13 band ( grb050730 ) , and in two cases in the white light ( grb100906a and grb080810 ) . with the use of calibrations from @xcite , spectral flux densities in the respective @xmath14 bands in the observer s reference frame
were found .
the @xmath14 values were converted into the spectral flux densities @xmath15 at the effective @xmath0-band wavelength in the proper frame of reference .
if there were no data on the optical spectral index @xmath16 , @xmath17 , the mean value @xcite for grb optical components was used , and the following values were determined : the flux in the observer s frame of reference @xmath18 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the frequency boundaries of a photometric band in the observer s frame of reference ; the integral optical flux @xmath21 ( the result of numerical integration of @xmath22 over time ) ; the time of the optical peak relative to the trigger time of a gamma - ray burst @xmath23 ; the increase and decrease indices of the optical radiation intensity , @xmath24 , .
the parameters of the gamma - ray emission the peak @xmath25 and integral @xmath26 fluxes in the range of 15350 kev , the time of the release of 90% of the grb energy @xmath27 , and the spectral index of the energy distribution @xmath28were adopted from butler et al .
table 1 lists the data on the gamma - ray bursts and their parameters in the observer s frame of reference . taking into account the extinction in the galaxy @xcite , the brightness of the host galaxy ( if available ) , and the extinction in it , the following grb parameters were determined for the standard cosmological model with @xmath29 , @xmath30 , in the proper frame of reference : the maximal optical @xmath0 band luminosity @xmath31 where @xmath32 and @xmath33 are the frequency boundaries of the standard @xmath0 band , and @xmath34 is the photometric distance ; the total optical energy @xmath35 for the same range ( the time integral of @xmath36 ) ; the time - related parameters taking into account cosmological contraction .
the isotropic equivalent of the gamma - ray burst energy in the extended range of @xmath37 was adopted from @xcite , the peak luminosity @xmath38 was derived from @xmath25 as @xmath39 if the extinction @xmath40 in the host galaxy was not measured , then based on the data on @xmath41 for 76 bursts from @xcite , we determined the average of these values at a corresponding redshift and transformed them into @xmath40 using the model of extinction in the magellanic clouds @xcite .
the data on the parameters of the gamma - ray bursts in the proper frame of reference are presented in table 2 .
all the optical transients have been classified into one of four following types based on the ratio between the duration of gamma - ray emission itself and the lag of the beginning of the optical brightness increase relative to the time of the trigger .
( prompt ) ; thirteen optical transients are classified here whose brightness begins to increase before the attenuation of gamma - ray radiation .
this type includes four events , referred to as p ? , whose belonging to p is ambiguous ; they may belong to the a(u ) type ( see below ) .
@xmath42 a ( afterglow ) ; 34 transients whose brightness begins to increase after the gamma - ray activity is ended .
@xmath42 a(u ; seven transients whose brightness is increasing in the presence of underlying residual gamma - ray radiation after 90% of the total burst energy is released .
for the statistical analysis , seven samples were formed containing the following types of objects : \(1 ) p and p ?- type transients ; \(2 ) only afterglows a ; \(3 ) only the transients with underlying continuing gamma - ray activity a(u ) ; \(4 ) all 54 optical transients ; \(5 ) afterglows a and transients with underlying continuing gamma - ray activity a(u ) ;
\(6 ) only prompt optical emissions p ; \(7 ) the a - type transients along with a(u ) and p ? .
unweighted pearson correlation coefficients @xmath0 and their significance levels @xmath43 were determined between all possible pairs of grb parameters @xmath44 and @xmath45 from these samples by the formulas @xmath46 @xmath47 where @xmath48 and @xmath49 are the average values of @xmath44 and @xmath45 , @xmath50 is the euler gamma function , @xmath51 is the number of points @xmath52 .
correlations between the parameters with and the significance levels of were assumed to be significant , and the linear regression coefficients were then determined for these parameters ( table 3 ) .
among all the correlation relationships established in this study , the @xmath54 dependence ( fig . [ fig1:beskin_n ] ) , discovered for the first time , in our opinion presents the greatest interest .
in particular , its presence leads to the concept of probable cosmological evolution of the local interstellar medium in the gamma - ray burst birthplaces .
notice that this correlation is highly significant for all object types except for the p - type sample objects , which is corroborating evidence that transients belong to afterglows ( a and objects , whose characteristics virtually coincide in the discussed correlation ) . to be completely confident that the discovered correlation is real , the possible role of selection effects in its occurrence has to be analyzed .
notice that to determine the effect of selection on the parameters of the bursts in the samples of different types , it is first of all necessary to examine the whole set of brightness estimates for optical companions of the bursts at the time of their discovery . to this end , we built the dependences of the observed magnitudes on @xmath55 of optical companions at the times of their discovery and the light curve peak ( fig .
[ fig2:beskin_n ] ) . based on the data of figs . 1 and 2
, the following conclusions can be formulated .
given a relatively equal luminosity at different redshifts in the proper reference frames , the observed flux should drop quadratically with @xmath55 , and therewith at maximum redshifts reach the typical detection limit at around @xmath56 , estimated in our sample from the total light curves .
this effect would lead to a lack of low - luminosity objects in the proper frame of reference , whose observed brightness is fainter than @xmath57 , and as a consequence , to a luminosity increase with growing redshift .
nevertheless , no regular radiation flux decrease is observed either in the whole set of brightness estimates for optical transients at the moment of their detection or in the peak brightness . on the other hand , both at @xmath58 and
@xmath59 the brightness of objects varies within close limits from @xmath60@xmath61 to @xmath62@xmath63 , by far exceeding the detection limit of @xmath56 . in other words ,
the selection by brightness is absent in our data .
we compared the correlation coefficients and linear regression parameters for the group of transients from the a + a(u ) + p ?
sample , localized in different redshift ranges ( table 4 ) .
it is easy to see that even if we exclude the transients with @xmath66 and @xmath67 , the luminosity increase with increasing redshift remains detectable and significant . clearly , if we narrow the redshift range , the correlation coefficients decrease , but nevertheless the linear regression parameters for different groups of transients remain the same within their errors ; in particular , the exponents are close to 45
. .characteristics of the redshift dependence of the a+a(u)+p ?
sample peak optical luminosity in different @xmath65 ranges : the number of transients in the sample @xmath68 , the pearson correlation coefficient @xmath0 , the linear regression parameters @xmath69 [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] | gamma - ray bursts are brightest transient phenomena isotropic equivalent energy reaches @xmath5 erg ) variable sources observed in radio infrared optical x - ray less intensive but powerful enough luminosities reaching @xmath6 ergs@xmath7 division manifestations into two types transients accepted : emission synchronous with gamma - ray prompt continuing until @xmath8 90% gamma - ray burst energy released afterglows starting after burst turns off popular description model combines inner and outer shock waves while fragments relativistic outflow decelerate due to collisions studies devoted to examining properties of gamma - ray bursts verification of phenomenon models self - consistent physical picture far from constructed especially for optical components unclear reverse shock waves energy structure relativistic jet density distribution in ambient interstellar medium surrounding burst search for statistical relationships between parameters of bursts in subsamples model remains topical task important analysis of properties of sample of gamma - ray bursts with measured redshifts about 250 objects @xcite data allows statistical analysis of parameters gamma - ray bursts revealing relations between physical characteristics @xcite similar relations analyzed for optical components host galaxies characteristics local interstellar medium in grb progenitors main problem is optimum ratio between object selection criteria and sample size : latter decreases for rigorous selection significance of statistical dependences falls selection effects increases study correlations between parameters of grbs with redshifts peaked optical light curves latter condition isolates specific physical condition : deceleration of ejecta colliding inside jet or ejected matter in outer interstellar medium not known physical processes determine occurrence peak division of objects into subsamples time interval between optical brightness increase and trigger with duration of gamma - ray emission identification of physical type of optical emissions stems from statistical analysis of entire subsample some objects classified as prompt optical emissions found close to afterglows statistical properties use of sample of grbs with known redshifts for analysis problem of cosmological evolution of properties of bursts and interstellar medium in region localizationsection 2 gives definitions techniques obtaining characteristics describes methods statistical analysis initial data obtained results sections 3 4 5 discuss important correlations between grb parameters relationship optical luminosity curve peaks redshift burst energy in gamma - ray range luminosity time peak section 6 summarizes results fifty - four gamma - ray bursts with redshifts peaked optical light curves selected for analysis time dependences detected radiation flux gamma - ray optical ranges data sources for determining grb parameters light curves in @xmath0 band @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 band two cases white light grb100906a calibrations from @xcite spectral flux densities in @xmath14 bands found @xmath14 values converted into spectral flux densities @xmath15 at effective @xmath0-band wavelengthno data on optical spectral index mean value @xcite for optical components used values determined flux in observer s frame of reference @xmath18 frequency boundaries photometric band integral optical flux @xmath21 numerical integration @xmath22 time optical peak trigger time gamma - ray burst @xmath23 increase decrease indices optical radiation intensity parameters gamma - ray emission peak integral @xmath26 fluxes 15350 kev time release 90% grb energy @xmath27 spectral index energy distribution adopted from butler et al table 1 lists data on gamma - ray bursts parameters observer s frame extinction in galaxy brightness host galaxy extinction grb parameters determined for standard cosmological model with @xmath29 @xmath30 maximal optical @xmath0 band luminosity @xmath31 frequency boundaries standard band photometric distance total optical energy @xmath35 same range time integral of @xmath36 time - related parameters cosmological contractionisotropic equivalent gamma - ray burst energy @xmath37 adopted from @xcite peak luminosity @xmath38 derived from @xmath25 @xmath39 if extinction @xmath40 galaxy not measured based data @xmath41 76 bursts from @xcite determined average transformed into @xmath40 using model extinction magellanic clouds @xcite data parameters gamma - ray bursts in table 2 optical transients classified four types ratio duration gamma - ray emission lag optical brightness increase relative trigger ( prompt ) ; thirteen transients brightness before attenuation gamma - ray radiation includes four events p ? ambiguous a(u ) type @xmath42 a ; 34 transients brightness after gamma - ray activity @xmath42 a(u ; seven transients brightness residual gamma - ray radiation after 90% burst energy releasedstatistical analysis seven samples formed types objects ) p p ?- type transients ) afterglows a ) transients continuing gamma - ray activity a(u ) ) all 54 optical transients ) afterglows a transients gamma - ray activity a(u ) ) prompt optical emissions p(7 ) a - type transients a(u ) p ? unweighted pearson correlation coefficients @xmath0 significance levels @xmath43 determined between grb parameters @xmath44 @xmath45 formulas @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 average values @xmath50 euler gamma function number of points @xmath52 correlations between parameters significance levels assumed significant linear regression coefficients determined parameters ( table 3 ) correlation relationships @xmath54 dependence fig_n discovered first time presents greatest interest leads probable cosmological evolution local interstellar medium in gamma - ray burst birthplaces correlation significant for all object types except p - type sample objects transients belong to afterglows characteristics coincide correlation possible role selection effectsdetermine effect selection on parameters bursts in samples to examine brightness estimates for optical companions at discovery built dependences of observed magnitudes on @xmath55 and light curve peak ( fig:beskin_n based on data conclusions formulated equal luminosity at redshifts observed flux should drop quadratically with @xmath55 at maximum redshifts reach detection limit at around @xmath56 effect to lack of low - luminosity objects in brightness fainter than @xmath57 luminosity increase with growing redshift no regular radiation flux decrease observed in brightness estimates for transients at detection or in peak brightness at @xmath58 and @xmath59 brightness varies from to exceeding detection limit of @xmath56 selection by brightness absent in data compared correlation coefficients linear regression parameters for transients from a + a(u ) + p ? sample in different redshift ranges ( table 4 ) even transients with @xmath66 and @xmath67 luminosity increase with increasing redshift remains detectable significantnarrow redshift range correlation coefficients decrease linear regression parameters groups transients remain same exponents close to 45 redshift dependence a+a(u)+p sample peak optical luminosity @xmath65 ranges number transients @xmath68 pearson correlation coefficient @xmath0 linear regression parameters @xmath69 cols="^ | 0.498268 | 2,800 | 1,379 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,843 | despite of many measures applied for determine the difference between two groups of observations , such as mean value , median value , sample standard deviation and so on , we propose a novel non parametric transformation method based on mallows distance to investigate the location and variance differences between the two groups .
the convexity theory of this method is constructed and thus it is a viable alternative for data of any distributions .
in addition , we are able to establish the similar method under other distance measures , such as kolmogorov - smirnov distance .
the application of our method in real data is performed as well .
mallows distance ; shift and scaled ; kolmogorov - smirnov distance | the aim of this paper is to provide a method to determine the location and scale relationship between two groups of one - dimensional observations for two samples , say @xmath0 and @xmath1 , such as the responses of two different products on different subjects , the scores of people on two examinations and so on .
suppose @xmath2 are independent identity distributed according to @xmath3 and @xmath4 are independent identity distributed according to @xmath5 , where @xmath3 and @xmath5 are two unknown distribution functions . when the test for normality is not passed , nonparametric analysis methods should be applied . usually , the mean difference or midian difference of the two samples is used to determine the location difference and use mean ratio or midian ratio to obtain the scale .
they are not reliable since only a small information of the two samples are extracted and the results are not meaningful .
based on the idea of location - scale transformation , freitag , munk and vogt @xcite has developed an approach to access the structure relationship between distributions , in which the whole information of the samples are used . however , the problem we concern are the location difference and scale between two distributions rather than the model structure . that s to say , we have to determine the values of location difference or scale or both for any two distributions . using the same transformation idea ,
our approach can be described as follows .
let @xmath6 a linear function , i.e. , @xmath7 , where @xmath8 and @xmath9 .
@xmath10 is a given measure of discrepancy between two distributions .
denote the distribution function of @xmath11 by @xmath12 .
let @xmath13 .
we want to find the value @xmath14 which minimize @xmath15 .
that s to say , if we transform @xmath2 to be @xmath16 , the two groups of observations are closest and under the `` closest '' mean we can not tell there are any location difference or scale between them .
therefore , we can say @xmath4 is at least @xmath17 larger than @xmath18 times of @xmath2
. there are situations where @xmath14 is not unique .
let @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 .
conservatively , at first we can take @xmath22 if @xmath23 , else @xmath24 ; then take @xmath17 to be the value in @xmath25 satisfying @xmath26 .
when @xmath27 is a continues region , it is easy to see that the selected @xmath14 is unique .
therefore , we should find certain @xmath10 that @xmath27 is a continues region .
besides , if we let @xmath28 in @xmath29 , the location difference between @xmath30 and @xmath31 could be determined .
if we let @xmath32 in @xmath29 , the scale between @xmath30 and @xmath31 could be determined . in practice
, we could use the empirical distributions of the two group of data for @xmath3 and @xmath5 , respectively . the discrepancy measure
@xmath10 we consider in this paper will be focused on mallows distance and expand to kolmogorov - smirnov distance .
mallows distance was presented in the formulation of statistics framework in 1972 , however , an independent physics research work had involved such a related concept a little earlier in 1940s .
the rest of the paper is unfolded as follows . in section 2
the main results under mallows distance for the location transformation , scale transformation or both are presented , showing that we can uniquely determine the location and scale relationship between two distributions and thus mallows distance is suitable discrepancy measure to use . in section 3
the similar results can be obtained under kolmogorov - smirnov distance but only for location transformation .
section 4 gives the application of this approach to determine the location and scale relationship on real data .
in this subsection , we consider the proposed approach under mallows distance . formally , the mallows @xmath33-distance ( also known as wasserstein @xmath33-distance ) between distributions @xmath3 and @xmath5 regarding to random variables @xmath34 and @xmath35 , respectively , is defined as @xmath36 where the infimum is taken over the set ( denoted by @xmath37 ) of all joint distributions of @xmath34 and @xmath35 with marginals @xmath3 and @xmath5 . here
we require that @xmath34 and @xmath35 have finite @xmath33th moment , i.e. , @xmath38 and @xmath39 . for @xmath40 , the mallows @xmath33-distance @xmath41 has the two properties .
* mallows distance @xmath41 , i.e. satisfies axioms of a metric on @xmath37 . * the convergence of distributions in mallows distance is equivalent to weak convergence plus @xmath33th moment convergence.(lavina and bickel , 2001 ) let @xmath42 be an uniform random variable , @xmath43 , and @xmath44 is the inverse of a distribution function , @xmath45 .
according to johnson and samworth ( 2005 ) we know @xmath46 equation ( [ eq - u ] ) gives an easier computation formula to calculate the distance , that is @xmath47 particularly , when @xmath48 , we have a further relationship for computation @xmath49 which is especially useful when calculating mallows 1-distance using empirical distribution for real data , in order to circumvent the unknown real distribution .
let @xmath50 , where @xmath8 and @xmath51 , and @xmath52 be its distribution function , then it is easy to obtain that @xmath53 .
the purpose of our approach is to find the optimal shift and scale values @xmath14 to minimizing the mallows @xmath33-distance between @xmath54 and @xmath55 , that is @xmath56 then the following result can be obtained . [ thr-1 ] for distribution functions @xmath3 and @xmath5 , let @xmath53 with @xmath57 .
then the mallows @xmath33-distance ( @xmath58 ) between @xmath54 and @xmath55 , denoted by @xmath29 , a function of two variables @xmath59 and @xmath60 , is a continuous and convex function on half plane , i.e. , for any @xmath61 , and @xmath62 , @xmath63 , it holds that @xmath64 it can be easily obtained that @xmath65 . from ( [ eq - uu ] )
, we know @xmath66 then the continuity of the @xmath67 is trivial . besides , using minkowski unequality we have @xmath68 according to the definition of theorem [ thr-1 ] , scaled parameter @xmath59 should be greater than zero , but we can easily give an apparent analysis of transformed distribution function if @xmath69 .
@xmath70 also , the theorem shows that under mallows @xmath33-distance ( @xmath71 ) @xmath67 is a convex function of @xmath72 , thus ( [ eq-1 ] ) is a continues region
. we can select @xmath14 according to the plan in section [ sec : intro ] . if we only consider the shifted case or scaled case , let @xmath28 or @xmath32 in @xmath67 ,
then we can obtain the following results .
for distribution functions @xmath3 and @xmath5 , let @xmath73 .
then the mallows @xmath33-distance ( @xmath58 ) between @xmath54 and @xmath55 , denoted by @xmath74 , a function of @xmath60 , is a continuous and convex function on @xmath75 , i.e. for any @xmath61 , and @xmath63 , it holds that @xmath76 for distribution functions @xmath3 and @xmath5 , let @xmath77 with @xmath57 .
the mallows distance ( @xmath58 ) between the scaled distribution @xmath54 and @xmath55 , denoted as @xmath78 , a function of @xmath59 , is a continuous and convex function on @xmath79 , i.e. for any @xmath61 , and @xmath62 , it holds that @xmath80 in order to illustrate @xmath67 may not be strictly convex , let distributions @xmath3 and @xmath5 to be @xmath81 actually , @xmath3 is the uniform distribution over two half unit intervals @xmath82 $ ] and @xmath83 $ ] , and @xmath5 is uniform over @xmath84 $ ] . from ( [ eq - uuu ] )
we know @xmath74 can be calculated via @xmath85 .
then it is easy to verify that @xmath74 reaches minimum of 0.5 in the entire interval @xmath86 $ ] .
the optimal shifted value for @xmath87 is not unique .
therefore , @xmath74 is not strictly convex on @xmath75 , nor is @xmath67 .
since our approach is successful under mallows distance , there is nothing preventing us from exploring other discrepancy measure . here , we are able to realize our approach for shifted case under kolmogorov - smirnov distance ( k - s distance ) , @xmath88 . for k - s distance and distribution functions @xmath3 and @xmath5 ,
our purpose is to find the optimal shift value @xmath17 to minimize @xmath89 .
let @xmath90 and @xmath91 for distribution @xmath30 .
define @xmath92 $ ] and @xmath93 $ ] , then we have @xmath94 .
and we denote @xmath95 and @xmath96 . due to these definitions ,
the statement @xmath97 is apparently hold and we have the following result .
[ thr-2 ] @xmath98 if @xmath99 , then the function @xmath74 decreases on @xmath100 $ ] and increases on @xmath101 .
@xmath102 if @xmath103 , then the function @xmath74 decreases on @xmath104 and increases on @xmath105 .
@xmath98 @xmath106 , if @xmath107 , then we have @xmath108 if @xmath109 , then @xmath110 holds and @xmath111 . by ( [ eq-2 ] ) , we can obtain @xmath112 . thus @xmath112 and @xmath113 .
therefore , @xmath114 decreases on @xmath100 $ ] . similarly , @xmath115 , if @xmath116 , then we have @xmath117 if @xmath112 , then @xmath118 holds and @xmath119 . by ( [ eq-3 ] ) , we can obtain @xmath109 .
thus @xmath120 . therefore ,
@xmath114 increases on @xmath121 .
@xmath102 the proof can follow the similar method as @xmath98 trivially .
theorem [ thr-2 ] shows that our approach under k - s distance can also provide a reasonable , possibly unique location difference between two distributions .
in hair study , we need to assess effets of hair care products in changing hair diameters after a period of use . there are two treatments , say @xmath122 and @xmath30 .
the experiments are conducted as follows .
there are 30 subjects and each subject use @xmath122 and @xmath30 on the left and right head , respectively .
there are two study visit , baseline and 8 weeks later . at each study visit ,
hair diameters are measured on several hundred of hairs on left and right head from a subject .
comparison between visits is to compare the distributions of hair diameters at two visit point .
the diameters from one subject often follows non - traditional distributions . for example , a subject at baseline and 8 weeks later hair diameter frequency plot for treatment @xmath122 are shown in figure [ fig1 ] and the distributions are shown in figure [ fig2 ] .
it is of importance to know holistically how much diameters have changed . for each subject ,
the optimal shift amount of the distributions of hair diameters at the two visit point for each treatment under mallows distance and k - s distance can be obtained .
for instance , the shift plots for @xmath122 and @xmath30 of a subject are displayed in figure [ fig3 ] and shift plots of all subjects for @xmath122 are displayed in figure [ fig4 ] .
the shift corresponding to the minimum distance is the difference between two distributions , for comparison analysis .
shift plot of all subject for @xmath122,width=345 ] use the optimal values for each subject each treatment as responses and perform wilcoxon signed rank test on differences in shifts between treatments for all subjects to detect a difference between the treatments .
the results are shown in table [ tab-1 ] , from which we concludes that the two treatments are difference at 0.01 level .
.[tab-1]comparison of treatments under distance shift [ cols="^ , < , < , < , < , < , < " , ]
in this paper , we demonstrated a significant theorem relating to how to measure two distribution within the probabilistic interpretation under mallows distance or k - s distance , and a well studied simulation on real data had been implemented for an illustration of this method . the solid theoretical foundation would be beneficial to others who would have a further understanding or research on mallows distance measures the discrepancy between two distributions , especially two similar distributions with inner relationship .
besides those distances , there might be possibility to use other divergence measures to be minimized after proper transformations .
comparison among various underlying divergence measures will be of interest .
this is an area of research that we continue to pursue provided available resources and interests .
in addition , a comparison of this approach versus other methods is another topic to be investigated .
freitag , g. , munk , a. , vogt , m. 2003 .
_ assessing structural relationships between distributions - a quantile process approach based on mallow s distance .
_ in : recent advances and trends in nonparametric statistics
akritas , m. g. , politis , d. n. , amsterdam : elsevier b. v. , 123 - 137 . | aim paper method determine location scale relationship between two groups one - dimensional observations for two samples @xmath0 and @xmath1 responses products subjects scores two examinations suppose @xmath2 independent @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 unknown distribution functions when test normality not passed nonparametric analysis methods applied mean difference or midian difference of two samples used to determine location obtain scale not reliable small information extracted results not meaningful based location - scale transformation developed approach to access structure relationship between distributions whole information samples used problem concern location difference scale between two distributions model structure determine values of location difference scale for two distributions transformation idea approach described let @xmath6 linear function @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath10 measure discrepancy between two distributions denote distribution function of @xmath11 by @xmath12 @xmath13 find value @xmath14 minimize @xmath15 transform @xmath2 to be @xmath16 two groups observations closest closest mean location difference or scale between say @xmath4 is @xmath17 larger than @xmath18 times of @xmath2 situations @xmath14 not unique let @xmath19 take @xmath22 if @xmath23 @xmath24 take @xmath17 value @xmath25 satisfying @xmath26 @xmath27 continues region selected @xmath14 unique find certain @xmath10 @xmath27 continues region let @xmath28 in @xmath29 location difference between @xmath30 @xmath31 determined @xmath32 in @xmath29 scale between @xmath30 @xmath31 determined use empirical distributions data for @xmath3 @xmath5 discrepancy measure @xmath10 focused on mallows distance expand kolmogorov - smirnov distance mallows distance presented statistics framework 1972 independent physics research work concept 1940s paper section 2 results under mallows distance location scale transformation presented determine location scale relationship between distributions mallows distance suitable discrepancy measure section 3 similar results under kolmogorov - smirnov distance for location transformation section 4 application approach determine location scale relationship on real data consider proposed approach under mallows distancemallows @xmath33-distance wasserstein-distance between distributions @xmath3 @xmath5 random variables @xmath34 @xmath35 defined as @xmath36 infimum over @xmath37 joint distributions @xmath34 marginals @xmath3 @xmath5 require @xmath34 @xmath35 have finite @xmath33th moment @xmath38 @xmath39 mallows @xmath33-distance @xmath41 properties mallows distance satisfies axioms metric on @xmath37 convergence of distributions mallows distance equivalent to weak convergence plus @xmath33th moment convergence(lavina bickel 2001 @xmath42 uniform random variable @xmath43 @xmath44 inverse of distribution function @xmath45 johnson samworth 2005 @xmath46 equation easier computation formula calculate distance @xmath47 @xmath48 relationship computation @xmath49 useful calculating mallows 1-distance @xmath50 @xmath8 @xmath51 @xmath52 be distribution function easy obtain @xmath53 find optimal shift scale values @xmath14 minimizing mallows @xmath33-distance between @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 resultthr-1 ] distribution functions @xmath3 let @xmath53 with @xmath57 mallows @xmath33-distance @xmath58 ) between @xmath29 function variables @xmath59 continuous convex function half plane @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 holds @xmath64 obtained @xmath65 @xmath66 continuity @xmath67 trivial minkowski unequality @xmath68 definition theorem thr-1 scaled parameter @xmath59 greater than zero analysis transformed distribution function @xmath69 @xmath70 theorem shows mallows @xmath33-distance @xmath71 ) @xmath67 convex function @xmath72 continues region select @xmath14 plan section intro consider shifted case scaled case let @xmath28 @xmath32 in @xmath67 results distribution functions @xmath3 @xmath5 let @xmath73 mallows @xmath33-distance @xmath58 ) between @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath74 function @xmath60 continuous convex function @xmath75 @xmath61 @xmath63 holds @xmath76 distribution functions @xmath3 @xmath5 let @xmath77 with @xmath57mallows distance @xmath58 between distribution @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath78 function of @xmath59 continuous convex on @xmath79 @xmath61 @xmath62 holds @xmath80 @xmath67 not strictly convex distributions @xmath3 @xmath5 @xmath81 @xmath3 uniform over half unit intervals @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath5 uniform over @xmath84 @xmath74 calculated via @xmath85 verify @xmath74 reaches minimum 0.5 in interval @xmath86 optimal shifted value for @xmath87 not unique @xmath74 not strictly convex on @xmath75 @xmath67 approach successful under mallows distance exploring other discrepancy measure approach for shifted case under kolmogorov - smirnov distance @xmath88 @xmath3 @xmath5 find optimal shift value @xmath17 to minimize @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 distribution @xmath30 define @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 denote @xmath95 @xmath96 statement @xmath97 result @xmath99 function @xmath74 decreases on @xmath100 increases on @xmath101@xmath102 if @xmath103 function @xmath74 decreases @xmath104 increases @xmath105 @xmath98 @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath110 holds @xmath111 eq-2 ] obtain @xmath112 @xmath112 @xmath113 @xmath114 decreases @xmath100 @xmath115 if @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath112 @xmath118 holds @xmath119 eq-3 ] obtain @xmath109 @xmath120 @xmath114 increases @xmath121 @xmath102 proof similar method @xmath98 theorem [ thr-2 ] shows approach k - s distance reasonable location difference distributions hair study assess hair care products changing hair diameters use two treatments @xmath122 @xmath30 experiments 30 subjects use @xmath122 @xmath30 left right head two study visit baseline 8 weeks later hair diameters measured left right head comparison distributions hair diameters diameters one subject non - traditional distributions subject baseline 8 weeks later hair diameter frequency plot treatment @xmath122 figure fig1 distributions figure fig2 ] importance know how diameters changedeach subject optimal shift amount distributions hair diameters two visit point each treatment under mallows distance k - s distance obtained shift plots for @xmath122 @xmath30 displayed figure fig3 all subjects @xmath122 figure fig4 shift minimum distance difference between two distributions comparison analysis shift plot @xmath122=345 optimal values each subject treatment perform wilcoxon signed rank test on differences shifts between treatments results shown in table tab-1 two treatments difference at 0.01 level -1]comparison of treatments under distance shift demonstrated significant theorem measure two distribution probabilistic interpretation under mallows distance k - s distance studied simulation on real data implemented solid theoretical foundation beneficial further understanding research mallows distance measures discrepancy between two distributions similar distributions relationship use other divergence measures after transformations comparison among underlying divergence measures interest area of research pursue resources comparison approach versus other methods topic freitag , g. munk a. vogt , m. 2003 assessing structural relationships between distributions quantile process approach based on mallow s distancerecent advances trends nonparametric statistics akritas politis d amsterdam elsevier 123 - 137 | 0.503244 | 3,133 | 1,701 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,856 | the impact of recent multi - loop calculations on precise determinations of charm- and bottom - quark masses and the strong coupling constant is discussed .
qcd has developed from a qualitative model for strong interactions into a quantitative theory with precise predictions for a multitude of observables .
this development , which has taken place in particular during the past two decades , is due to significant improvements in our theoretical understanding , in calculational techniques and in improved experimental results , ranging from low energy studies in @xmath0-lepton decays through precise cross section measurements in electron - positron annihilation up to measurements of the @xmath1-boson decay rate into hadrons with permille accuracy .
many of these inclusive observables are related to essentially the same object in quantum field theory , namely the absorptive part of the current - current correlator . restricting the discussion to measurements at high energies or to properly chosen integrals
, these observables can be evaluated in perturbation theory and lead to precise determinations of the fundamental parameters of qcd , quark masses and the strong coupling constant . | a detailed analysis of @xmath2 and @xmath3 based on the itep sum rules @xcite has been performed several years ago @xcite . during the past years
new and more precise data for @xmath4 have become available in the low energy region , in particular for the parameters of the charmonium and bottomonium resonances .
furthermore , the error in the strong coupling constant @xmath5 which enters this analysis has been reduced .
last not least , the vacuum polarization induced by massive quarks has been computed in four - loop approximation ; more precisely : its first derivative at @xmath6 , which corresponds to the lowest moment of the familiar @xmath7-ratio has been evaluated in @xcite . based on these developments a new determination of the quark masses has been performed in ref .
more recently also the second moment has been calculated @xcite .
the extraction of @xmath8 from low moments of the cross section @xmath9 exploits its sharp rise close to the threshold for open charm and bottom production . by evaluating the moments @xmath10 with low values of @xmath11 ,
the long distance contributions are averaged out and @xmath12 involves short distance physics only , with a characteristic scale of order @xmath13 . through dispersion relations the moments
are directly related to derivatives of the vacuum polarization function at @xmath6 , @xmath14 which can be evaluated in perturbative qcd ( @xmath15 is the @xmath16 mass at the scale @xmath17 ) .
the perturbative series for the coefficients @xmath18 in order @xmath19 was originally evaluated up to @xmath20 in ref .
@xcite , and to `` arbitrary '' high order in @xcite .
the four - loop contributions to @xmath21 and @xmath22 were evaluated in refs .
@xcite , those to @xmath23 in @xcite .
combining eqs .
( [ eq::mexp ] ) and ( [ eq::mexp1 ] ) the quark mass can be extracted . at this point
it should be emphasized that the relative weight of resonances and continuum is quite different in the experimental moments .
furthermore , low moments are less sensitive to non - perturbative contributions from condensates , to the coulombic higher order effects , the variation of @xmath17 and the parametric @xmath24 dependence . for @xmath25 :
@xmath26 the moment with @xmath27 is less sensitive to data for @xmath28 from the continuum region above @xmath29 , where experimental results are scarce and the aforementioned theory uncertainties are still relatively small .
the agreement between @xmath25 and @xmath27 ( @xmath30 ) , together with the nice convergence with increasing order in @xmath24 can be considered as additional confirmation of this approach .
instead of measuring the moments @xmath31 in @xmath32 annihilation they can also be determined in lattice simulations .
this approach has recently been pioneered in @xcite using the highly improved staggered quarks ( hisq ) discretization of the quark action in combination with four - loop perturbative results @xcite .
the final result , @xmath33 corresponds to a scale - invariant mass @xmath34 and is in excellent agreement with the determinations based on @xmath32 data . and
@xmath35.[fig::mb_compare],title="fig : " ] and @xmath35.[fig::mb_compare],title="fig : " ] the approach based on @xmath32 data is also applicable to the determination of @xmath3 .
the three results based on @xmath36 and 3 are of comparable precision .
the relative size of the contributions from the threshold and the continuum region decreases for the moments @xmath27 and 3 . on the other hand , the theory uncertainty is still small .
therefore the result from @xmath27 was taken as the final answer @xcite , despite the fact that @xmath23 was not yet known .
the result , @xmath37 , corresponds to @xmath38 .
the recent evaluation @xcite of @xmath23 has lead to a decrease of the central value by @xmath39 and a reduction of the error from @xmath40 to @xmath41 .
a comparison of a few selected @xmath3- and @xmath2-determinations is shown in fig .
[ fig::mb_compare ] .
one of the most precise and theoretically safe determination of @xmath24 is based on measurements of the cross section for electron - positron annihilation into hadrons @xcite .
these have been performed in the low - energy region between 2 gev and 10 gev and , in particular , at and around the @xmath1 resonance at 91.2 gev .
conceptually closely related is the measurement of the semileptonic decay rate of the @xmath0-lepton , leading to a determination of @xmath24 at a scale below 2 gev @xcite .
the perturbative expansion for the ratio @xmath42 in numerical form is given by @xmath43 here @xmath44 and the normalization scale @xmath45 .
the @xmath46 corrections are conveniently classified according to their power of @xmath47 , with @xmath47 denoting the number of light quarks .
the @xmath48 term is part of the `` renormalon chain '' , the next term of order @xmath49 was evaluated in @xcite , the complete five - loop calculation has been performed in @xcite .
let us now move to the analysis of present data for @xmath32 annihilation and @xmath0 decays .
measurements of @xmath28 at lower energies , with their correspondingly larger values of @xmath24 , are in principle more sensitive to @xmath5 if the same relative precision could be obtained . at present , however , the systematic experimental error of 2% is a limiting element for a competitive measurement .
the final result of a recent analysis @xcite @xmath50 represents the combined information on the strong coupling from @xmath7 measurements in the region between @xmath51 and the bottom threshold .
in contrast to the situation below 10 gev the extraction of @xmath24 from @xmath1-decays is affected by the @xmath52 terms .
the @xmath53 analysis of the electroweak working group @xcite is shifted @xcite by @xmath54 and one finds @xmath55 the theory error can now safely be neglected .
higher orders are of particular relevance in the low - energy region , for example in @xmath0 decays .
the correction from perturbative qcd to the ratio @xmath56 is given by the factor @xmath57 which can be evaluated in fixed order perturbation theory or with `` contour improvement '' as proposed in @xcite : @xmath58 starting from @xmath59 @xcite one obtains @xcite @xmath60 and @xmath61 , respectively .
the second uncertainty corresponds to a change in the renormalization scale @xmath62 between @xmath63 and @xmath64 .
as stated above the theory error for @xmath24 from @xmath1 decays is small compared to the experimental uncertainties . for @xmath0 decays the difference between fort and cipt must be considered as irreducible uncertainty @xcite : @xmath65 applying four - loop running and matching @xcite ( with negligible error from the evolution from @xmath66 to @xmath67 ) : @xmath68 the shifts in @xmath5 from z- and @xmath0-decays , are opposite in sign and move the values in the _ proper _ direction , decreasing , thus , the current slight mismatch between two independent determinations of @xmath24 .
the two results are in remarkable agreement and can be combined to one of the most precise and presently only @xmath69 result : @xmath70 as discussed above , @xmath24 from @xmath0-decays is strongly affected by theory uncertainties .
this is reflected in three recent publications which all are based on the same set of @xmath0 data and the new five - loop results , which , however , arrive at significantly different estimates of higher order terms and hence of @xmath24 . in @xcite
it is argued that fopt exhibits a poorly `` convergent '' series , in contrast to cipt , where a subset of higher order contributions ( so - called @xmath71-terms ) is automatically summed .
this analysis leads to @xmath72 .
the small theory uncertainty is a consequence of the ( artificially ) reduced @xmath17-dependence and the restrictive assumptions about higher orders in perturbation theory .
the opposite viewpoint has been advocated in @xcite where an explicit and plausible behaviour of the perturbative series is modelled .
strong cancellations are observed between the aforementioned @xmath71-terms and those terms which can only be obtained from a concrete higher order calculation .
all these papers are based on similar assumptions about non - perturbative power - suppressed contributions .
these assumptions have been questioned in @xcite , employing different weight functions in order to suppress these poorly determined terms with dimension @xmath73 .
a significantly smaller result , @xmath74 , is obtained within cipt . in total the spread among the different results is covered reasonably well by eq .
( [ als_tau ] ) .
last not least it is instructive to compare eqs .
( [ alpha_mz_new ] ) and ( [ eq : asres_mz ] ) with @xmath24 determinations based on lattice simulations .
the most recent results from a precision simultaion by the hpqcd collaboration @xcite @xmath75 and from a study @xcite based on essentially the same lattice data and an alternative perturbative analysis , @xmath76 are in mutual agreement , as should be expected because they are based on a similar set of data . remarkably enough , a completely different approach @xcite , which exploits the lattice simulation of the pseudoscalar correlator and which has been mentioned already above leads to @xmath77 again well consistent with the other determinations .
v. a. novikov , l. b. okun , m. a. shifman , a. i. vainshtein , m. b. voloshin and v. i. zakharov , phys .
* 41 * ( 1978 ) 1 .
j. h. khn and m. steinhauser , nucl .
b * 619 * ( 2001 ) 588 [ erratum - ibid .
b * 640 * ( 2002 ) 415 ] [ arxiv : hep - ph/0109084 ] .
k. g. chetyrkin , j. h. khn and c. sturm , eur .
j. c * 48 * ( 2006 ) 107 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0604234 ] .
r. boughezal , m. czakon and t. schutzmeier , phys .
d * 74 * ( 2006 ) 074006 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605023 ] .
, , , * * , ( ) , .
k. g. chetyrkin , j. h. khn and m. steinhauser , phys .
b * 371 * ( 1996 ) 93 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9511430 ] ; nucl .
b * 505 * ( 1997 ) 40 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9705254 ] .
r. boughezal , m. czakon and t. schutzmeier , nucl .
* 160 * ( 2006 ) 160 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0607141 ] .
a. maier , p. maierhofer and p. marquard , nucl .
b * 797 * ( 2008 ) 218 [ arxiv:0711.2636 [ hep - ph ] ] .
a. maier , p. maierhfer , p. marquard , [ arxiv:0806.3405[hep - ph ] ] and these proceedings .
m. davier , s. descotes - genon , a. hocker , b. malaescu and z. zhang , arxiv:0803.0979 [ hep - ph ] . m. beneke and m. jamin , arxiv:0806.3156 [ hep - ph ] .
k. maltman and t. yavin , arxiv:0807.0650 [ hep - ph ] .
c. t. h. davies _ et al _ [ hpqcd collaboration ] , arxiv:0807.1687 [ hep - lat ] . k. maltman , d. leinweber , p. moran and a. sternbeck , arxiv:0807.2020 [ hep - lat ] . | analysis of @xmath2 @xmath3 itep sum rules performed years ago precise data for @xmath4 available low energy region charmonium bottomonium resonances error in coupling constant @xmath5 reduced vacuum polarization massive quarks computed in four - loop approximation first derivative at @xmath6 lowest moment @xmath7-ratio evaluated in @xcite new determination of quark masses performed in ref second moment calculated @xcite extraction of @xmath8 from low moments @xmath9 exploits sharp rise for open charm bottom production evaluating moments @xmath10 with low values @xmath11 long distance contributions averaged @xmath12 involves short distance physics scale order moments related to derivatives vacuum polarization function at @xmath6 @xmath14 evaluated in perturbative qcd @xmath15 @xmath16 mass scale perturbative series for coefficients @xmath18 @xmath19 evaluated to @xmath20 arbitrary high order in @xcite four - loop contributions to @xmath21 @xmath22 evaluated in @xcite @xmath23 combining eqs quark mass extractedrelative weight of resonances continuum different in experimental moments low moments less sensitive to contributions condensates coulombic higher order effects variation of @xmath17 parametric @xmath24 dependence @xmath25 moment with @xmath27 less sensitive to data @xmath28 continuum region above @xmath29 experimental results scarce theory uncertainties small agreement between @xmath25 @xmath27 convergence with increasing order in @xmath24 approach moments @xmath31 @xmath32 annihilation determined in lattice simulations approach pioneered in @xcite improved staggered quarks discretization four - loop perturbative results final result @xmath33 corresponds to scale - invariant mass @xmath34 with determinations @xmath32 data approach applicable to determination of @xmath3 three results @xmath36 and 3 comparable precision relative size contributions from threshold continuum region decreases for moments @xmath27 and 3 theory uncertainty small result from @xmath27 as final answer @xcite @xmath23 not known result @xmath37 corresponds to @xmath38evaluation @xmath23 central value @xmath39 error from @xmath40 to @xmath41 comparison @xmath3- @xmath2-determinations in fig . precise safe determination @xmath24 based on cross electron - positron annihilation into hadrons performed low - energy region between 2 gev and 10 gev @xmath1 resonance at 91.2 gev related semileptonic decay rate @xmath0-lepton determination @xmath24 below 2 gev perturbative expansion for @xmath42 given by @xmath43 @xmath44 normalization scale @xmath45 @xmath46 corrections classified according to power @xmath47 light quarks @xmath48 term part of renormalon chain next @xmath49 evaluated in @xcite complete five - loop calculation in @xcite analysis data for @xmath32 annihilation @xmath0 decays measurements @xmath28 at lower energies larger values @xmath24 sensitive to @xmath5 systematic experimental error of 2% for competitive measurement final result analysis @xmath50 represents combined information strong coupling from @xmath7 measurements between @xmath51 and bottom thresholdbelow 10 gev extraction @xmath24 from @xmath1-decays affected by @xmath52 terms @xmath53 analysis shifted by @xmath54 @xmath55 theory error neglected higher orders in low - energy region @xmath0 decays correction from perturbative qcd to ratio @xmath56 by @xmath57 evaluated fixed order perturbation theory contour improvement @xmath58 from @xmath59 obtains @xmath60 second uncertainty change renormalization scale @xmath62 between @xmath63 and @xmath64 theory error for @xmath24 from @xmath1 decays small experimental uncertainties @xmath0 decays difference between fort and cipt irreducible uncertainty @xmath65 four - loop running negligible error evolution @xmath66 to @xmath67 shifts in @xmath5 from z- @xmath0-decays move values decreasing mismatch between determinations @xmath24 two results combined to precise @xmath69 result @xmath24 from @xmath0-decays affected by theory uncertaintiesreflected in three publications based on @xmath0 data new five - loop results different estimates of higher order terms @xmath24 @xcite argued fopt poorly convergent series contrast to cipt higher order contributions @xmath71-terms automatically summed analysis leads to @xmath72 small theory uncertainty reduced @xmath17-dependence restrictive assumptions about higher orders in perturbation theory opposite viewpoint advocated in @xcite explicit behaviour perturbative series modelled cancellations observed between @xmath71-terms terms from concrete higher order calculation papers based on assumptions about non - perturbative power - suppressed contributions assumptions questioned in @xcite different weight functions to suppress poorly determined terms with @xmath73 smaller result @xmath74 obtained within cipt spread among results covered by eq . als_tau compare eqs alpha_mz with @xmath24 determinations lattice simulations recent results from precision simultaion hpqcd collaboration @xcite @xmath75 study @xcite @xmath76 in mutual agreement based similar datadifferent approach @xcite lattice simulation pseudoscalar correlator leads @xmath77 consistent determinations novikov okun shifman vainshtein voloshin zakharov phys 41 * ( 1978 ) 1 j h. khn m steinhauser 619 2001 ) 588 640 2002 ) 415 arxiv hep - ph/0109084 ] chetyrkin j h. khn c. 48 ( 2006 ) 107 hep - ph/0604234 ]. boughezal m czakon t schutzmeier phys 74 ( 2006 ) 074006 hep - ph/0605023 ] chetyrkin khn steinhauser phys 371 ( 1996 ) 93 hep - ph/9511430 nucl 505 ( 1997 ) 40 hep - ph/9705254 boughezal czakon schutzmeier 160 ( 2006 ) 160 hep - ph/0607141 ] a. maier p. maierhofer p. marquard nucl 797 * ( 2008 ) 218 arxiv:0711.2636 hep - ph maier marquard arxiv:0806.3405[hep - ph proceedings m. davier s. descotes - genonhocker malaescu zhang arxiv:0803.0979 hep - ph beneke jamin arxiv:0806.3156 hep ph maltman yavin arxiv:0807.0650 hep - ph davies hpqcd collaboration arxiv:0807.1687 hep - lat maltman p moran arxiv:0807.2020 hep - lat | 0.434591 | 2,863 | 1,489 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,857 | in the search for unmodeled gravitational wave bursts , there are a variety of methods that have been proposed to generate candidate events from time series data .
block normal is a method of identifying candidate events by searching for places in the data stream where the characteristic statistics of the data change .
these change - points divide the data into blocks in which the characteristics of the block are stationary .
blocks in which these characteristics are inconsistent with the long term characteristic statistics are marked as event - triggers which can then be investigated by a more computationally demanding multi - detector analysis . | the ongoing search for the direct detection of gravitational waves using earth based experiments involves the analysis of observations made at a variety of different detectors .
these observations are time series samples of the detector state that are then processed by various means to identify gravitational wave candidates . broadly speaking the searches for gravitational waves
may be broken up into two categories , those searches that are based upon a model , such as the search for gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries , and those searches that endeavor to find gravitational waves without using a model .
the latter category of searches are often referred to as `` burst '' searches .
these searches typically seek to identify portions of data that are , for a short period , anomalously `` loud '' in comparison to the surrounding data . identifying a gravitational wave burst in the absence of a source model
is an involved and potentially computationally expensive process .
this is especially true when the ratio of signal power to noise power is low .
a convenient and natural approach to mitigating the computational expense of identifying such bursts divides the problem of detection into two parts . in the first part
, an inexpensive procedure is used to identify candidate sections of data that trigger the second part of the analysis .
the second part of the analysis focuses on the subintervals of data identified by the first .
it is a more computationally complex and expensive analysis that either discards the candidate or identifies it as a gravitational wave burst . in this way the first part of the analysis carried out by a so - called `` event - trigger generator '' , performs triage on the data that must be analyzed by the more complex second stage of the analysis .
blocknormal is an event trigger generator that analyzes data in the time domain and searches for moments in time where the statistical character of the time series data changes . in particular , blocknormal characterizes the time series between change - points by the mean(@xmath0 ) and variance(@xmath1 ) of the samples .
change - points are thus demarcation points , separating `` blocks '' of data that are consistent with a distribution having a given mean and variance , which differs from the mean and/or variance that best characterizes the data in an adjacent block .
the onset of a signal in the data will , because it is uncorrelated with the detector noise , increase the variance of the time series for as long as the signal is present with significant power . in this way blocks with variance greater than a `` background '' variance mark candidate gravitational wave bursts .
since candidate gravitational wave bursts are identified with changes in the detector noise character it is best if the detector noise is itself stationary and white .
the blocknormal analysis thus starts by identifying long segments of data , epochs , which are relatively stationary .
this process involves comparing adjacent stretches of data of fixed a duration long relative to the expected duration of a gravitational wave burst and asking whether adjacent stretches have consistent means and variances . in order to avoid any bias that might come from analyzing outliers in the tails of the distribution ( where one might expect any true signal to be located ) , the mean and variance
are computed on only those samples that are within the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the sample values .
if two consecutive stretches are inconsistent at the @xmath2 confidence level , the begining of the first stretch is used to define a new stationary segment .
segments thus defined are split into a set of frequency bands whose lower band edge is heterodyned to zero frequency .
this base - banding allows for a crude determination of the frequency of any identified triggers .
line and other spectral features are removed , either by kalman filtering or by regression against diagnostic channels , and the final data whitened with a linear filter .
once the data has undergone the base - banding and whitening process , the search for change - points begins in earnest .
the method employed is similar to that described in @xcite and relies on a bayesian analysis of the relative probability of two different hypotheses : * @xmath3 , that the time series segment @xmath4 is drawn from a distribution characterized by a single mean and variance ; and * @xmath5 , that the time series segment @xmath4 consists of two continuous and adjacent subsegments each drawn from a distribution characterized by a different mean and/or variance . given the time series segment @xmath4 , consisting of @xmath6 samples , we write the probability of hypothesis @xmath3 as @xmath7 and the probability of hypothesis @xmath5 as @xmath8 .
the odds of @xmath5 compared to @xmath3 is thus : @xmath9 applying bayes theorem and simplifying this becomes : @xmath10 where , @xmath11 is independent of the data @xmath4 itself , although it does depend on the number of samples @xmath6 .
if @xmath5 is true , then @xmath3 will be a good hypothesis for two subsets of the data , one from sample 1 to @xmath12 , denoted @xmath13 and another from @xmath14 to @xmath6 , @xmath15
. then we can write : @xmath16 to calculate @xmath17 we thus need only be able to calculate @xmath18 for arbitrary time series @xmath4 the probability that a given data set is drawn from a normal distribution with unknown mean and variance is equal to : @xmath19-\mu)^{2}}{2\sigma^{2}}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath20 is the a priori probability that the mean takes on a value @xmath0 and the variance a value @xmath21 . with the usual uninformative priors for @xmath0 and @xmath22 ( @xmath23 and @xmath24 )
the integral for @xmath18 can be evaluated in closed form : @xmath25^{-\frac{(n-1)}{2}}i_{n-2 } \\
i_{n } \equiv ( n-1 ) ! ! \left\{\begin{array}{ll}1
& \mbox{$n$ odd } \\ \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2 } } & \mbox{$n$ even } \end{array } \right.\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath26 an @xmath27 .
the value of @xmath17 is therefore the odds that there is a change - point in @xmath28 to there not being any change - points , and the value @xmath29 is related to the odds that there is a change - point at sample @xmath14 to there not being one anywhere in @xmath4 .
the calculated value of @xmath17 is compared to a threshold , @xmath30 , and if greater than this threshold , a change - point is considered to be at the sample with the largest value of @xmath29 .
figure [ signal ] shows some simulated data along with @xmath29 for that data .
the two peaks in the value of @xmath29 corresponds to where the mean of the simulated noise changes .
[ signal ] as a function of the hypothetical change point time.,title="fig : " ] this process either leaves @xmath4 free of change - points , or it divides the data into two subsets . in the latter case , the blocknormal pipeline repeats the change - point analysis on these subsets and all subsequent subsets , until either no more change - points are found , or the subset is less than 4 data points long . by this iteration method
blocknormal breaks the data at these change - points into a set of blocks , each of which is free of any change point .
a final refinement step is taken where successive pairs of blocks are analyzed to check that the change - point would still be considered significant over the subset of the data that is contained within the two blocks .
blocknormal identifies blocks time series segments between successive change - points are well characterized by a mean , a variance , a frequency band , a start time , and a duration . to identify unusual blocks , the means and variances
are compared to the mean and variance , @xmath31 and @xmath32 of all the data in their band from the epoch in which they were found .
blocknormal defines `` events '' to be blocks in which the following condition holds true for a value , @xmath33 , that is used to characterize the block : @xmath34 here , @xmath35 , is called the event threshold and is a free parameter in the algorithm which adjusts the sensitivity in defining what `` unusual '' means .
there are a limited number of reasonable other possible threshold requirements based on the three characteristics of a block , @xmath0,@xmath22,@xmath36 , however , at this time these have not been explored .
once events have been identified , immediately adjacent events in the same frequency band are clustered together , with a peak - time for the cluster defined by the central time of the block with the largest value of @xmath37 .
a cluster `` energy '' is a sum over the @xmath38 blocks that comprise it : @xmath39 \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath40 is the duration in samples .
a key factor in building confidence in any identification of gravitational waves is the presence of a signal in different detectors . using this `` coincidence '' as the basis for further reducing the number of periods of interest , blocknormal requires that there be coincidence in time between events in the same band but different detectors before a `` trigger ''
is formed . triggers from different bands
are merged if they overlap in time into a single trigger .
figure [ coinc ] illustrates how this coincidence and merging step works using the three ligo interferometers .
the blocknormal event trigger generator is a time domain analysis in base - banded data that identifies blocks in time which are well characterized by a mean and variance .
blocks with means and variances that are unusually large compared to the mean and variance of the much longer data segment containing them are marked for consideration as being unusual events .
several coincident events in different detectors together form a trigger which can be used to define periods of interest that a more computationally intense analysis can use to reduce the total computing time needed to search for unmodeled gravitational wave events .
this work was supported by the center for gravitational wave physics , the international virtual data grid laboratory , and the national science foundation under award phy 00 - 99559 .
the international virtual data grid laboratory is supported by the national science foundation under cooperative agreement phy-0122557 ; the center for gravitational wave physics is supported by the national science foundation under cooperative agreement phy 01- 14375 .
1 smith a f m 1975 _ biometrika _ * 62*,2 p. 407416 | search for direct detection of gravitational waves using experiments involves analysis observations at detectors these observations are time series samples processed to identify gravitational wave candidates searches for gravitational waves into two categories based upon model and without model latter category referred as `` burst '' searches identify portions of data anomalously `` loud '' identifying gravitational wave burst source model is involved computationally expensive process especially when ratio signal power to noise power low approach to mitigating computational expense identifying bursts divides problem detection into two parts first part inexpensive procedure candidate sections data second part analysis second part focuses on subintervals data identified first more computationally complex expensive analysis discards candidate or identifies as gravitational wave burst first part analysis by event - trigger generator '' performs triage on data complex second stage blocknormal is event trigger generator analyzes data time searches for moments where statistical character of time series data changes blocknormal characterizes time series between change - points by mean(@xmath0 ) and variance(@xmath1 ) of sampleschange - points are demarcation points separating blocks data consistent with distribution given mean and variance from data in adjacent block onset of signal with detector noise variance time series signal present with significant power blocks with variance greater than background variance mark candidate gravitational wave bursts identified with changes in detector noise best if detector noise stationary and white blocknormal analysis starts identifying long segments data relatively stationary comparing adjacent stretches data of fixed duration relative to expected duration gravitational wave burst asking consistent means and variances to avoid bias mean and variance computed on samples within 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of sample values if two consecutive stretches inconsistent at confidence level begining of first stretch to define new stationary segment segments defined split into frequency bands lower band edge heterodyned to zero frequency base - banding allows for crude determination of frequency of identified triggers line spectral features removed by kalman filtering or regression final data whitened with linear filter search for change - points beginsmethod similar to @xcite bayesian analysis probability two hypotheses @xmath3 @xmath4 from distribution single mean variance @xmath5 @xmath4 two subsegments from different mean variance series segment @xmath4 @xmath6 samples probability of hypothesis @xmath3 as @xmath7 @xmath5 as @xmath8 odds of @xmath5 compared to @xmath3 : @xmath9 becomes @xmath10 @xmath11 independent of data @xmath4 on number of samples @xmath6 if @xmath5 true @xmath3 good hypothesis for two subsets data from sample 1 to @xmath12 @xmath14 to write : @xmath16 to calculate @xmath17 calculate @xmath18 for arbitrary time series @xmath4 probability data set from normal distribution with unknown mean variance equal to @xmath19-\mu^{2}}{2\sigma^{2}}}\end @xmath20 a priori probability mean @xmath0 variance @xmath21uninformative priors for @xmath0 ) integral @xmath18 evaluated closed form : @xmath25^{-\frac{(n-1)}{2}}i_{n-2 }\equiv ( n-1 )\left\begin{array}{ll}1 \mbox{$n$ odd } \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2 } }\mbox{$n$ even }\end{array\right{aligned} @xmath26 @xmath27 value @xmath17 odds change - point @xmath28 value @xmath29 related odds change - point sample @xmath14 @xmath4 calculated value @xmath17 compared to threshold @xmath30 if greater than change - point at sample largest value @xmath29 figure shows simulated data @xmath29 two peaks in value @xmath29 mean simulated noise changes function hypothetical change point time process leaves @xmath4 free change - points or divides data into two subsets blocknormal pipeline repeats change - point analysis until no more change - points found or subset less than 4 data points long blocknormal breaks data into blocks each free change pointfinal refinement successive pairs blocks analyzed check change - point significant over data within two blocks blocknormal identifies blocks time series segments between change - points characterized by mean variance frequency band start time duration identify unusual blocks means variances compared to mean variance @xmath31 @xmath32 data in band from epoch blocknormal defines events blocks condition for value @xmath33 block : @xmath34 @xmath35 event threshold free parameter algorithm adjusts sensitivity defining unusual limited reasonable threshold requirements based on three characteristics block @xmath0,@xmath22@xmath36 not explored events identified adjacent events same frequency band clustered together peak - time cluster defined by central time of block with largest value of @xmath37 cluster energy '' is sum over @xmath38 blocks @xmath39 @xmath40 is duration in samples key factor confidence identification gravitational waves presence signal in different detectors periods interest blocknormal requires coincidence in time between events same band different detectors before trigger formed triggers from different bands merged if overlap into single triggerfigure illustrates coincidence merging step three ligo interferometers blocknormal event trigger generator time domain analysis identifies blocks characterized by mean variance blocks with means variances unusually large data marked unusual events coincident events detectors form trigger define periods of interest reduce computing time unmodeled gravitational wave events work supported by center for gravitational wave physics international virtual data grid laboratory national science foundation phy 00 - 99559 international virtual data grid laboratory supported national science foundation phy-0122557 center gravitational wave physics national science foundation agreement 01- 14375 smith a f 1975 biometrika 62,2 p. 407416 | 0.357128 | 2,253 | 1,154 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,860 | the phenomenon of stochastic resonance ( sr ) has been mainly studied in one - dimensional systems with additive noise .
we show that in higher dimensional systems and in the presence of multiplicative noise , a non - linear magnetic system with a strongly periodic current can show behavior similar to that of sr but only for frequencies below the ferromagnetic resonance ( fmr ) frequency of the system .
such a phenomena can provide an effective way to suppress low frequency noise in spin valve magnetic sensors .
the application of stochastic resonance @xcite to increase the signal to noise ratio ( snr ) is now well established in many physical systems @xcite and has also been shown to increase the stability of an unstable system in some cases @xcite .
particle production in a quantum field can also be enhanced in the presence of noise @xcite .
the snr is enhanced by adding noise to the system as it is being driven by an external periodic force .
however until now only one - dimensional systems with additive noise and a simple bistable potential , e.g. , @xmath0 , or a potential with one metastable state , e.g. , @xmath1 , have been studied and shown to have this interesting property of increasing the snr with the addition of noise as it is being driven by a time - dependent force .
this counter intuitive response is inherently related to the non - linearities present in these systems .
one might therefore ask if a similar behavior can be found in more complicated systems , in particular magnetic systems . in this letter , we give one example of such systems ; a spin valve of two magnetic layers separated by a normal conductor .
the magnetization is inhomogeneous in the free layer and a current perpendicular to the plane ( cpp ) traverses the structure . in this case
a spin torque between the layers can exist and will play in the following an important role in the sr effect . until recently ,
the ideas of stochastic resonance have not been exploited in magnetic systems .
as far as i know , reference @xcite provides the only application we are aware of ; it applies sr to the measurement of hysteresis loops in magnetic systems described by preisach model . in the following , we study a magnetic system with multiplicative noise and show that a stochastic resonance type behavior exist in this system and can be taken advantage of to _ selectively _ suppress frequencies from the noise spectrum .
the system we treat is very realistic and hence more complex than previously treated systems @xcite .
the use of strong time - dependent currents implies that our system is in a non - equilibrium state and linear response methods are obsolete for our study @xcite .
in this letter we will attempt only a qualitative treatment of this subject aided by numerical integration of the non - linear landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation @xcite .
we study a current perpendicular to the plane ( cpp ) spin valve with two magnetic layers ( fig .
[ geometry ] ) , one with magnetization @xmath2 pinned along the x - axis ( reference layer rl ) while the other layer ( fl ) has a free magnetization @xmath3 .
figure [ zerocurrent ] shows the power spectral densities ( psd ) of the thre components of the magnetization in the absence of current .
the psd s have been normalized the same way in all the figures .
the noise in the z component is smallest due to the demagnetization field .
the current has an ac component in addition to the dc component .
the source of noise in the system is due to thermal fluctuations that activates switching between two states and hence it is intrinsic to the system . to get an energy surface with more than one local minimum
, we bias the spin valve with an external field that is close to being perpendicular to the fixed magnetization of the rl and take into account spin momentum transfer effects @xcite between the two layers of the spin valve .
the y - component of the external field is kept at @xmath4 while the one along @xmath5 is kept around @xmath6 .
the layers have dimensions @xmath7 with the easy axis along the x - axis and anisotropy @xmath8 .
the magnetization in the pinned layer is fixed by a large bias field . hence , in this study the pinned layer is studied micromagnetically on equal footing with the free layer .
the magnetization in this structure shows two configurations ( fig .
[ config ] ) which are non - homogeneous and are a result of the demagnetization field , the current field and any interaction between the layers @xcite .
in addition to stable and unstable states , the system has saddle points which are present due to the spin torque term .
spin valve structures are useful components of giant magneto - resistance ( gmr ) sensor devices and hence the manifestations of stochastic resonance in these systems may be of practical importance . to increase the sensitivity of a gmr sensor , the bias field on the free layer is almost perpendicular to the magnetization of the pinned layer . it is this kind of biasing that gives rise to the @xmath9-type noise studied here since it permits the system to hop between two - states
. the results reported here are valid even if the pinning of the bottom layer is not perfect .
in fact , large bias fields tend to distort the magnetization in the pinned layer but only slightly and will not contribute to the 1/f - type noise observed here .
to analyze this system , we use the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation @xcite supplemented by the spin torque as first suggested by slonczweski @xcite , @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the gyromagnetic ratio and @xmath12 is the damping constant taken here to be equal to 0.01 .
the effective field @xmath13 includes exchange interactions , anisotropy , the demagnetization field and the field from the current .
the interlayer exchange is assumed small of the order of @xmath14 .
the value of @xmath12 chosen is larger than typical values of damping in the bulk of a permalloy . in a geometry such as ours ,
the damping is dominated by interfacial damping and 0.01 is a reasonable value for it @xcite .
the noise is assumed white gaussian , @xmath15 with @xmath16 and using the fluctuation - dissipation theorem ( fdt ) , @xmath17 is proportional to the temperature @xmath18 and inversely proportional to the volume @xmath19 , @xmath20 @xcite .
however , as we have shown in @xcite , in the presence of a bias voltage the fdt is strictly not applicable unless we restrict our region of interest to frequencies close to the fmr frequency of the system . in the following ,
we assume that fdt is still applicable .
@xmath21 is the direction of the magnetization in the rl .
the current @xmath22 has one static component and another one with frequency @xmath23 .
the form of the spin torque in the presence of ac currents still has the same form as in the slonczewski equation .
zhu et al .
@xcite calculated the ac spin torque in a magnetic tunnel junctions and found it to be very close in form to the static case . among other things
, they found that at low frequencies , the total spin torque can become less than the spin torque of the static component of the current .
hence an ac current can introduce a partial self - cancellation of the spin torque .
therefore we expect the ac spin torque to affect the noise spectrum of a magnetic system in a nontrivial way .
the noise or spectral density functions of the system are calculated numerically since for time dependent systems the fluctuation dissipation relations are invalid @xcite .
the current flows along the z - direction perpendicular to the xy plane of the magnetic layers .
the magnetization of the rl is fixed along the x - direction .
the fmr frequency for this system is around @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
the constant @xmath26 . in magnetic recording , e.g .
, such devices operate at frequencies below the fmr frequency and hence this system is considered noisy to be useful as a sensor . one possible way to address this problem is to seek a way to suppress the noise for frequencies less than @xmath27 and may be shift the noise to higher frequencies which is outside the operational range of the device .
in this sense we are selectively suppressing the noise below the fmr frequency only .
previous applications of stochastic resonance were interested in suppressing the noise around the frequency of the driving force which is usually the signal to be measured . from fig.[xac0 ] , we observe that it is the x - component of the magnetization of the fl that is the noisiest and hence this would interfere with the gmr signal .
the out - of plane z - component of the magnetization is very quiet due to the demagnetization field .
fig .
[ xtac0 ] shows that the source of the noise is from the switching of the magnetization between two configurations .
one with an average x - component of about @xmath28 and the other less stable one with an average x - component around @xmath29 . the spectral noise in the y and z components show more than the usual fmr peak since the system is not in equilibrium .
the higher order harmonics are due to non - homogeneity of the magnetization , i.e. , spin waves . in fig .
[ xt5nac0 ] , we change the sign of the current to show the effect of the spin torque on the magnetization and noise . in this case
, the magnetization spends almost equal time in both states .
this suggests the use of the spin torque itself as a regulator of the transition rate between two bistable states . in this letter
, we will not pursue this idea further and instead we want to explore the idea of adding a strongly periodic current in addition to the dc bias current in order to suppress the noise for frequencies below @xmath27 .
figure [ xac5 ] shows the result of applying an ac current with amplitude equal to the bias current and a frequency of about @xmath30 for the same system of fig . [ xac0 ] .
the noise spectrum for frequencies below @xmath31 is greatly suppressed by this additional current source .
however now the peak around the fmr frequency is much more pronounced and so does its width .
the second narrow peak is that of the ac current . a closer look at the real time behavior of the x - component of the magnetization , fig .
[ xac5 t ] , implies that the original energy barrier is no longer present .
the strong periodic current which in turn induces a periodic spin torque is driving the system and making it less sensitive to random thermal fluctuations which are the source of the low frequency . to be an effective suppressant , the frequency of the torque has to be outside the bandwidth of the sensor device .
finally , fig .
[ xac0ht1 ] shows that an increase in the frequency of the ac current degrades the effectiveness of the ac current component to suppress the low frequency noise .
we found for this example , that for current amplitudes at @xmath32 , the maximum frequency the current should have is about twice the fmr frequency of the system .
this latter criterion seems to depend strongly on the energy surface and hence there is no universal behavior as in the bistable one dimensional well where the frequency of the driving force is the inverse of twice the inter - well transition time . in summary
, we have shown that the ideas of sr are still attractive even for complex systems which can not be described by a one dimensional potential . in higher dimensions and in the presence of a spin torque ,
saddle point states become available to the system and may invalidate the ideas of stochastic resonance . in this letter
, we showed that a strongly periodic current can suppress thermally induced jumps between a stable and a metastable state and hence suppresses the low frequency noise and enhance the fmr peak in the spin valve .
_ this work is based on work done in the fall of 2004 at seagate research and will not be published elsewhere .
it is merely a compilation of numerical observations .
the author hopes to convince others that there is an interesting interplay of noise and time - dependent spin torques in cpp spin valves that is worth exploring in a more systematic way than attempted here . _ | we would like to thank g.j .
parker for making his llg solver available to us . | thank g.j parker making llg solver available | 0.064304 | 21 | 11 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,861 | we extract two - photon exchange amplitudes for the elastic electron - proton scattering at @xmath0 from the unpolarized cross - section and recent polarization transfer measurements .
there are three independent amplitudes , but only one of them , @xmath1 , can be determined with a reasonable accuracy ( about 10% ) .
the result is in good agreement with theoretical predictions .
rough estimates for two other amplitudes are obtained . | in last years , a lot of experimental and theoretical effort was made to study two - photon exchange ( tpe ) in the elastic electron - proton scattering .
this activity was motivated by the discovery of the problem in the proton form factor measurements : values of form factor ratio @xmath2 obtained by rosenbluth separation and polarization transfer methods were is strong disagreement .
it is now widely accepted that the discrepancy is caused by tpe , but still no direct experimental observations of tpe exist .
previously , several attempts were made to extract values of tpe amplitudes from available experimental data in more or less model - independent way @xcite . however , lack of precise data and/or theoretical understanding of tpe prevented from obtaining sufficiently accurate estimates for the amplitudes . in particular , it was difficult to determine the dependence of tpe amplitudes on the kinematical parameter @xmath3 , since the @xmath3 dependence of polarization observables was not known experimentally .
recently , a search for tpe effects in polarization observables was reported @xcite . in this experiment ,
ratio of transverse and longitudinal proton polarization components ( polarization ratio ) was measured with significantly improved precision for @xmath4 and wide range of the parameter @xmath3 . in the present paper we use latest experimental data to determine tpe amplitudes at @xmath4 following the ideas of ref .
@xcite with some improvements ( described below ) .
we will try to obtain as much information on tpe amplitudes as possible , while avoiding unnecessary assumptions . in our analysis
we only assume that tpe is the sole reason for the discrepancy between cross - section and polarization data , and rely on the following experimental and theoretical facts : 1 . the reduced cross - section exhibits no or small nonlinearity in @xmath3 ( @xcite , also verified in the present work ) .
2 . the polarization ratio does not vary significantly with @xmath3 @xcite .
3 . tpe amplitudes must vanish at @xmath5 ( because they can be represented by convergent dispersion integral ; @xmath5 implies @xmath6 , where @xmath7 is c.m .
energy squared ) .
the latter point was missing in ref .
there were no recent cross - section measurements in the @xmath8 region of our interest , so we have to use older data .
these data were analyzed before , but for our paper to be self - contained we repeat such an analysis here .
we have selected data in the range @xmath9 @xcite .
the corresponding reduced cross - sections were first multiplied by @xmath10 , to eliminate most of the @xmath8 dependence .
then , since in born approximation the reduced cross - section is _
r = g_m^2 + g_e^2 where @xmath11 and @xmath12 are electric and magnetic form factors , @xmath13 and @xmath14 is proton mass , the resulting values were fitted with the function a + b + c ( q^2 - 2.5 ^2 ) the last term takes into account @xmath8 dependence of @xmath15 term in @xmath16 .
we obtain rather acceptable fit with @xmath17 for 28 d.o.f . , indicating that the linearity of @xmath16 in @xmath3 is indeed supported by the data .
we will mainly need the quantity r_lt^2 = b / a which would be equal to @xmath18 at @xmath0 in born approximation .
we obtain @xmath19 , in agreement with the results ref . @xcite ( 0.1015 ) . in further calculations we use the first value .
we will use mostly the same notation as in ref .
we denote particle momenta according to e(k)+p(p)e(k)+p(p ) , and define @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 . in presence of tpe
, elastic electron - proton scattering amplitude has the form m = & |u_u |u ( f_1 ^- f_2 [ ^,^ ] + .
k_^ ) u where @xmath24 is fine structure constant , @xmath25 , @xmath26 ( @xmath27 , @xmath28 ) are initial and final electron ( proton ) spinors , and @xmath29 are scalar invariant amplitudes .
it is convenient to introduce linear combinations @xcite rclcl _ e & = & f_1 - f_2 + f_3/4m^2 & = & g_e + _ e + _ m & = & f_1 + f_2 + f_3/4m^2 & = & g_m + _ m + _ 3 & = & f_3/4m^2 & = & _ 3 where @xmath30 and prefix @xmath31 indicates tpe contribution .
the tpe amplitudes @xmath32 are complex , but only their real parts contribute to the observables discussed here . everywhere
below , speaking of the amplitudes , we will mean their real parts . neglecting terms of order @xmath33 , the reduced cross - section and polarization ratio
can be written as _
r & = & g_m^2 \ { + r_0 ^ 2 + 2 + 2r_0 ^ 2 } [ sigma_r ] + r & = & r_0 \ { 1 + - - } [ r ] where @xmath34 .
note that our definition of @xmath35 does not include a factor of @xmath36 , thus @xmath35 ( and @xmath37 ) is rather small quantity ( @xmath38 for @xmath39 ) .
utilizing this fact we will neglect last term in eq.([sigma_r ] ) ( the validity of this approximation will be checked afterwards ) . then , as it was argued in ref .
@xcite , the observed cross - section linearity in @xmath3 _ forces _ us to parameterize tpe amplitude @xmath1 as a linear function of @xmath3 . to vanish at @xmath5
, it must have the form [ cg_m ] _ m / g_m = a(1- ) then we have _
r = g_m^2 \ { + r_0 ^ 2 + 2 a ( 1 - ) } and the cross - section slope is r_lt^2 = from which we obtain [ a ] a = together with eq.([cg_m ] ) , this fully determines the amplitude @xmath1 . as a first approximation
, we replace @xmath40 by experimental value of polarization ratio , @xmath41 @xcite , and obtain numerically [ anum ] a = -0.0250 0.0035 thus extracted amplitude @xmath42 is shown in fig . [ fig1 ] with @xmath43 error band . the theoretical prediction @xcite is also shown and agrees rather well with our result .
( grey , @xmath43 band ) and its theoretical estimates , calculated with : elastic intermediate state only @xcite ( dashed ) , elastic + @xmath44 resonance @xcite ( solid).,scaledwidth=48.0% ] now we will take a closer look on the polarization ratio @xmath35 , which allows us to get some information about the amplitude @xmath45 .
first , we note that the last term in eq.([r ] ) should be very small , because the factor @xmath46 is not greater than 0.18 for @xmath47 .
thus we are left with [ r2 ] r = r_0 \ { 1 + - } since both @xmath1 and @xmath45 vanish at @xmath5 , we obviously have r_0 = .
r |_=1 , _ e - r_0 _ m = r - r_0 the experiment says that , at @xmath0 , there is no significant variation of @xmath35 with @xmath3 @xcite .
this implies [ cg_e ] r r_0 _ e r_0 _ m ( which also justifies using @xmath35 instead of @xmath37 in eq.([a ] ) ) .
now we can cross - check that the amplitude @xmath45 has small impact on the cross - section . using eqs.([cg_m],[a],[cg_e ] ) , we calculate the corresponding correction ( the last term of eq.([sigma_r ] ) ) and subtract it from the data
. then we repeat cross - section fitting and extraction of @xmath1 , as described above .
we obtain @xmath48 , i.e. practically no change with respect to ( [ anum ] ) .
eqs.([cg_e ] ) are , of course , a rough estimate . in particular , they do not allow to estimate the uncertainty of @xmath45 .
an accurate @xmath49 extraction with estimation of uncertainties requires determination of the small quantity @xmath50 , for which the present data hardly suffice .
nevertheless , note that theoretical calculations also show relative smallness of @xmath51 , which arises from significant cancellation between proton and @xmath44 resonance contributions ( fig .
[ fig2 ] ) .
, contribution of proton ( dashed ) , @xmath44 resonance ( dash - dotted ) , and total ( solid ) .
, scaledwidth=48.0% ] in the experiment @xcite , one more quantity was measured : longitudinal polarization of the final proton , @xmath52 . in principle , this data could help to determine the remaining amplitude @xmath53 .
the tpe correction to @xmath52 is given by p_l = - 2p_l \ { + } where @xmath54 is tpe correction to polarization ratio according to eq.([r2 ] ) .
as @xmath55 , the first term is negligible , and the deviation of @xmath52 from its born value is governed by the amplitude @xmath53 .
however , two available data points are too few to make any statements about @xmath3 dependence of @xmath53
. we can only compute @xmath53 at the @xmath3 values of experimental data .
the results are shown in fig .
[ fig3 ] . obviously , their precision is insufficient to make a meaningful comparison with theory .
the obtained values are compatible with zero , and do not contradict theoretical estimates as well . .
statistical and systematic errors are added in quadrature , inner bars pure statistical errors .
theoretical calculations with : elastic intermediate state only @xcite ( dashed ) , elastic + @xmath44 resonance @xcite ( solid).,scaledwidth=48.0% ]
in summary , we have tried to extract tpe amplitudes for the elastic electron - proton scattering at @xmath0 solely from the experimental data on cross - sections and polarization observables .
having defined three independent amplitudes @xmath1 , @xmath45 and @xmath53 , we found that the effect of these amplitudes on the observables is `` decoupled '' : the cross - section is mainly influenced by @xmath1 , the polarization ratio by @xmath45 and @xmath1 , longitudinal polarization component by @xmath53 .
the amplitude @xmath1 can be extracted with approximately 10% accuracy and is in good agreement with theoretical calculations .
the weakness of polarization ratio variation with @xmath3 implies approximate equality @xmath56 . as to the amplitude @xmath53 , present experimental data are consistent with @xmath57 . to allow for more accurate extraction of @xmath45 and @xmath53 , further polarization measurements at different @xmath3
are clearly needed .
it is also worth noting that momentum transfer value @xmath4 was not good choice for the experiment @xcite : just in this region tpe correction to polarization ratio is especially small because elastic and @xmath44 resonance contributions almost cancel each other .
recently , a preprint @xcite appeared , in which the same problem was considered .
however , authors have used certain parameterization of polarization component @xmath52 , which , to our opinion , is not well motivated by experimental data . their results strongly differ from ours as well as from theoretical calculations .
20 j. arrington , phys.rev .
c * 71 * , 015202 ( 2005 ) .
d. borisyuk , a. kobushkin , phys .
c * 76 * , 022201(r ) ( 2007 ) .
m. meziane _ et al .
_ , arxiv:1012.0339 [ nucl - ex ] .
v. tvaskis _ et al .
_ , phys .
c * 73 * , 025206 ( 2006 ) .
j. arrington , w. melnitchouk , j.a .
tjon , phys .
035205 ( 2007 ) . j. litt _
et al . _ ,
b * 31 * , 47 ( 1970 ) ; r.c .
walker _ et al .
_ , phys .
d * 49 * , 5671 ( 1994 ) ; l. andivahis _ et al .
_ , phys .
d * 50 * , 5491 ( 1994 ) ; m.e .
christy _ et al .
_ , phys .
c * 70 * , 015206 ( 2004 ) ; i.a .
qattan , arxiv : nucl - ex/0610006 .
d. borisyuk , a. kobushkin , phys .
c * 78 * , 025208 ( 2008 ) .
d. borisyuk , a. kobushkin , in preparation .
j. guttmann , n. kivel , m. meziane , m. vanderhaeghen , arxiv:1012.0564 [ hep - ph ] . | last years experimental effort study two - photon exchange tpe ) in elastic electron - proton scattering activity motivated by problem in proton form factor measurements values form factor ratio @xmath2 rosenbluth separation polarization transfer methods accepted discrepancy caused by tpe no direct experimental observations of tpe attempts to extract tpe amplitudes from experimental data lack of precise data theoretical understanding tpe prevented accurate estimates difficult to determine tpe amplitudes on kinematical parameter @xmath3 not known search for tpe effects in polarization observables reported @xcite ratio transverse longitudinal proton polarization components measured with improved precision for @xmath4 @xmath3 present paper use latest data to determine tpe amplitudes at @xmath4 improvements obtain information on tpe amplitudes avoiding unnecessary assumptions assume tpe sole reason for discrepancy between cross - section polarization data rely on experimental facts reduced cross - section exhibits no or small nonlinearity in @xmath3 polarization ratio vary significantly with @xmath3 @xciteamplitudes vanish at @xmath5 represented by convergent dispersion integral implies @xmath6 @xmath7 energy squared latter point missing no recent cross - section measurements in @xmath8 region older data analyzed repeat selected data @xmath9 @xcite reduced cross - sections multiplied by @xmath10 eliminate @xmath8 reduced cross - section r = g_m^2 + g_e^2 @xmath11 @xmath12 electric magnetic form factors proton mass values fitted with function a + b + c ( q^2 - 2.5 ^2 @xmath8 dependence @xmath15 in @xmath16 acceptable fit with @xmath17 for 28 d.o.f linearity of @xmath16 in @xmath3 supported by data need quantity r_lt^2 = b / a equal to @xmath18 at @xmath0 obtain @xmath19 with results @xcite ( 0.1015 ) further calculations use first value same notation denote particle momenta according e(k)+p(p define @xmath20presence tpe elastic electron - proton scattering amplitude form m = |u_u ( f_1 ^- f_2 [ ^,^ ] + . k_^ ) u @xmath24 fine structure constant initial final electron proton spinors scalar invariant amplitudes introduce linear combinations @xcite rclcl f_1 - f_2 + f_3/4m^2 g_e + m f_1 + f_2 + f_3/4m^2 g_m + + 3 f_3/4m^2 @xmath30 @xmath31 tpe contribution tpe amplitudes @xmath32 complex real parts contribute observables real parts @xmath33 reduced cross - section polarization ratio written r & = g_m^2 \ r_0 2 + + 2r_0 2 sigma_r ] =_0 + - @xmath34 definition @xmath35 include factor @xmath36 @xmath35 @xmath37 ) small quantity @xmath38 @xmath39 ) neglect last term eq.([sigma_r ] ) validity checked afterwards observed cross - section linearity @xmath3 parameterize tpe amplitude @xmath1 linear function @xmath3vanish @xmath5 form cg_m m / g = a(1- ) r = g_m^2 r_0 2 + 2 a ( 1 - ) cross - section slope r_lt^2 = obtain a = eq.([cg_m determines amplitude @xmath1 replace @xmath40 polarization @xmath41 @xcite obtain a = -0.0250 0.0035 extracted amplitude @xmath42 @xmath43 error band theoretical prediction @xcite agrees result @xmath43 band estimates calculated elastic intermediate state @xcite @xmath44 resonance=48.0% look polarization ratio @xmath35 information amplitude @xmath45 last term eq.([r ] small factor @xmath46 not greater than 0.18 @xmath47 r2 ] r = r_0 1 + - @xmath1 @xmath45 vanish @xmath5 r_0 = r - r_0 m = r - r_0 @xmath0 no significant variation @xmath35 @xmath3 @xcite implies cg_e ] r r_0 r_0 _ m justifies using @xmath35 instead @xmath37 eq.([across - check amplitude @xmath45 impact cross - section using eqs.([cg_m],[a[cg_e calculate correction last term eq.([sigma_r subtract from data repeat cross - section fitting extraction @xmath1 obtain @xmath48 no change [ anum eqs.([cg_e ] rough estimate estimate uncertainty @xmath45 accurate @xmath49 extraction requires small quantity @xmath50 present data suffice theoretical calculations show smallness of @xmath51 cancellation between proton @xmath44 resonance contributions ( fig . proton=48.0% experiment more quantity measured longitudinal polarization of final proton @xmath52 data could determine remaining amplitude @xmath53 tpe correction to @xmath52 by p_l = - 2p_l \ { + } @xmath54 tpe correction to polarization ratio according eq.([r2 ] ) @xmath55 first term negligible deviation @xmath52 from born value governed by amplitude @xmath53 two data points too few statements @xmath3 dependence of @xmath53compute @xmath53 at @xmath3 values experimental data results shown in fig precision insufficient comparison theory values compatible with zero contradict theoretical estimates statistical systematic errors added in quadrature theoretical calculations with elastic intermediate state @xcite elastic + @xmath44 resonance=48.0% tried extract tpe amplitudes for elastic electron - proton scattering at @xmath0 from experimental data cross - sections polarization observables defined three amplitudes @xmath1 effect decoupled cross - section influenced by @xmath1 polarization ratio @xmath45 longitudinal polarization by @xmath53 amplitude @xmath1 extracted with 10% accuracy with theoretical calculations polarization ratio variation with @xmath3 implies equality @xmath56 amplitude @xmath53 data consistent with @xmath57 further polarization measurements at @xmath3 needed momentum transfer value @xmath4 not good choice for experiment @xcite tpe correction to polarization ratio small elastic @xmath44 resonance contributions cancel preprint @xcite appeared same problemauthors used polarization @xmath52 not motivated experimental data results differ theoretical calculations arrington phys c * 71 * 015202 ( 2005 ) borisyuk kobushkin c 76 * 022201 2007 ) meziane arxiv:1012.0339 nucl - tvaskis c 73 * 025206 ( 2006 ) arrington melnitchouk tjon 035205 ( 2007 ) litt b * 31 * 47 ( 1970 ) walker phys d * 49 * 5671 ( 1994 ) andivahis phys d * 50 * 5491 ( 1994 ) christy phys c * 70 * 015206 ( 2004 ) qattan arxiv nucl - ex/0610006 borisyuk kobushkin c * 78 * 025208 ( 2008 ) borisyuk kobushkin preparation j guttmann kivel meziane vanderhaeghen arxiv:1012.0564 hep - ph | 0.436899 | 3,011 | 1,577 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,876 | in recent years higher - dimensional black holes have attracted much interest because of various developments in gravity and high energy physics .
but whereas higher - dimensional charged static ( tangherlini ) and uncharged rotating ( myers - perry ) black holes were found long ago , black hole solutions of einstein - maxwell theory , are not yet known in closed form in more than 4 dimensions , when both electric charge and rotation are present . here
we therefore study these solutions and those of einstein - maxwell - dilaton theory , by using numerical and perturbative methods , and by exploiting the existence of spacetime symmetries .
the properties of these black holes reveal new interesting features , not seen in @xmath0 . for instance , unlike the @xmath0 kerr - newman solution , they possess a non - constant gyromagnetic factor . | in einstein - maxwell ( em ) theory in @xmath1 dimensions the unique family of stationary asymptotically flat black holes with non - degenerate horizon comprises the rotating kerr - newman ( kn ) and kerr black holes and the static reissner - nordstrm ( rn ) and schwarzschild black holes .
em black holes are uniquely determined by their mass , their electric and magnetic charge , and their angular momentum ( see @xcite and references therein ) .
the generalization of black hole solutions to higher dimensions was pioneered by tangherlini @xcite for static vacuum black holes , and by myers and perry ( mp ) @xcite for stationary vacuum black holes . whereas myers and perry @xcite also obtained charged static black holes in higher dimensional em theory , higher dimensional charged rotating black holes
have not yet been obtained in closed form in pure em theory , although such black holes are known for some low energy effective actions related to string theory ( including additional fields , though ) @xcite .
higher dimensional black holes received much interest in recent years also with the advent of brane - world theories , raising the possibility of direct observation in future high energy colliders @xcite , which makes the theoretical study of these higher dimensional objects particularly appealing .
however , finding black holes solutions in higher dimensions is a difficult task due to the size and complexity of the equations .
moreover , contrary to what happens in @xmath0 the topology of the horizon is not unique in higher dimensions ( for instance , ringlike configurations are allowed @xcite ) , which makes the problem even harder . for these reasons
the number of solutions known analytically in closed form is very limited .
this forces us to use alternative techniques to study these black holes . here
we will briefly analyze such black holes by two methods : the numerical method and the perturbative method .
we will concentrate on einstein - maxwell - dilaton ( emd ) theory in @xmath2 dimensions , as an example how these methods may be applied .
the classical emd action reads @xmath3 where @xmath4 is the scalar curvature , @xmath5 is the dilaton field , @xmath6 is the electromagnetic field tensor , and @xmath7 is the electromagnetic potential .
@xmath8 is the dilaton coupling constant .
the equations of motion can be obtained by varying the action with respect to the metric @xmath9 , the dilaton field @xmath10 and the gauge potential @xmath7 , yielding @xmath11 \ , \label{fe1}\ ] ] @xmath12 for @xmath13 the theory reduces to pure em theory .
these equations admit an analytical solution when the dilaton coupling constant @xmath8 takes the kaluza - klein ( kk ) value @xmath14 @xcite @xmath15 in order to generate charged rotating solutions for generic values of @xmath8 we will assume that the topology of the horizon is spherical .
we will further assume that the black holes are stationary and axisymmetric .
stationary axisymmetric black holes in @xmath2 dimensions possess @xmath16 $ ] independent angular momenta @xmath17 associated with @xmath18 orthogonal planes of rotation @xcite .
( @xmath19 $ ] denotes the integer part of @xmath20 , corresponding to the rank of the rotation group @xmath21 . ) these black hole solutions then fall into two classes : even-@xmath2 and odd-@xmath2-solutions . when all @xmath18 angular momenta have equal - magnitude , the symmetry of these black holes is strongly enhanced .
in fact , in odd dimensions , the symmetry then increases from @xmath22 to @xmath23 , thus changing the problem from cohomogeneity-@xmath18 to cohomogeneity-1 . as a consequence
the original system of partial differential equations in @xmath18 variables then reduces to a system of ordinary differential equations ( ode s ) .
in what follows we will focus on the case where @xmath2 is odd , all angular momenta have the same magnitude , and the topology of the horizon is that of a sphere . that case is tractable numerically and perturbatively . under those assumptions
the metric , the gauge potential and the dilaton field can be parametrized with their angular dependence explicitly known @xmath24 + \frac{n}{f } r^2 \sum_{k=1}^n \left ( \prod_{l=0}^{k-1 } \cos^2 \theta_l \right ) \sin^2\theta_k \left({\varepsilon}_k d{\varphi}_k - \frac{\omega}{r } dt\right)^2 \nonumber \\ & & + \frac{m - n}{f } r^2 \left\ { \sum_{k=1}^n \left ( \prod_{l=0}^{k-1 } \cos^2 \theta_l \right ) \sin^2\theta_k d{\varphi}_k^2 \right . -\left .
\left[\sum_{k=1}^n \left ( \prod_{l=0}^{k-1 } \cos^2 \theta_l \right ) \sin^2\theta_k { \varepsilon}_k d{\varphi}_k\right]^2 \right\ } -f dt^2 \ , \label{metric}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath25 where @xmath26 , @xmath27 $ ] for @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 $ ] for @xmath31 , and @xmath32 denotes the sense of rotation in the @xmath33-th orthogonal plane of rotation .
the spacetime possesses @xmath34 commuting killing vectors , @xmath35 , and @xmath36 , for @xmath37 .
this parametrization employs isotropic coordinates and is appropriate for numerical purposes @xcite .
however , for perturbative purposes boyer - lindquist coordinates simplify the algebra @xcite . in order that the solutions correspond to black holes
they must possess an event horizon located at @xmath38 , characterized by the condition @xmath39 @xcite .
such an event horizon is in fact a killing horizon since the killing vector @xmath40 is null at and orthorgonal to the horizon , @xmath41 representing the constant horizon angular velocity .
the system of ode s resulting when eqs .
( [ metric]-[gauge_phi ] ) are substituted in eqs .
( [ fe1]-[fe3 ] ) must be supplemented with the appropriate set of boundary conditions .
this is obtained by imposing that the horizon is regular and the spacetime is asymptotically flat @xcite .
then the system of ode s is solved by employing a numerical solver ( e.g. , colsys ) , providing accurate results .
the numerical parameters are @xmath42 , with @xmath43 being the electric charge .
varying these parameters we obtain families of solutions , with their corresponding values of the physical properties like the mass @xmath44 , the angular momentum @xmath45 , etc .
an important information the numerical method provides is the domain of existence of black holes in higher dimensions .
that domain consists of the region in the parameter space bounded by the extremal solutions . in figure 1 ( left )
we exhibit the domain of existence of emd black holes in terms of the scaled electric charge @xmath46 and angular momentum @xmath47 .
clearly the domain depends both on the dilaton coupling constant @xmath8 and the dimension @xmath2 .
the accuracy of the numerical method may be tested by means of the analytical kk solutions , as well as by exact relations ( like the smarr mass formula ) these black holes satisfy @xcite . as a complementary method one may employ perturbations to generate black hole solutions in higher dimensions @xcite .
the advantage of this method is that it produces analytical formulae , which the numerical method does not .
however , the range of validity of these formulae is limited by the accuracy of the order of the perturbations .
a good perturbative parameter to produce charged rotating black hole solutions in higher dimensions is the electric charge .
one starts from the mp solution @xcite and expands the metric , the gauge potential and the dilaton in series expansions in the electric charge around the mp solution ( see @xcite for details ) .
those series are substituted in eqs .
( [ fe1]-[fe3 ] ) and solved order by order in the electric charge . for lower orders the equations are easy to solve but
as the order of the perturbations increases the equations become more and more difficult to solve .
an important point when applying the perturbative method is the way the integration constants are fixed .
one has to impose regularity of the solutions at the horizon together with the condition of asymptotic flatness .
the smarr mass formula is a useful means to check the accuracy of the solutions .
when the perturbative method is applied to extremal solutions the formulae simplify very much .
for instance , one obtains the following formula of the gyromagnetic factor @xmath48 to second order @xmath49 \left(\frac{q}{m}\right ) ^2 + o\left(\left(\frac{q}{m}\right)^2\right ) \ , \label{gfactor}\ ] ] showing that the gyromagnetic factor is not constant for pure em solutions ( @xmath13 ) .
although both methods have a different range of applicability there is a region of the parameter space where both are valid , namely , when the electric charge is small . in that region
one can check the consistency of the methods and their level of agreement @xcite .
this is presented in figure 1 ( right ) where the perturbative formula eq .
( [ gfactor ] ) for extremal solutions is compared to the corresponding non - perturbative numerical results for @xmath50 .
we observe that for @xmath51 both approches are in good agreement .
in fact , the perturbative method may be modified to analyze also slowly rotating solutions , using as the unperturbated initial solution the tangherlini solution and using the angular momentum as the perturbative parameter . to summarize , these two methods are complementary and provide us with a powerful tool to analyze black holes in higher dimensions when analytical solutions are not available . | einstein - maxwell theory @xmath1 dimensions unique family stationary flat black holes non - degenerate horizon comprises rotating kerr - newman black holes static reissner - nordstrm schwarzschild black holes black holes determined by mass electric magnetic charge angular momentum generalization black hole solutions to higher dimensions pioneered by tangherlini @xcite static vacuum myers and perry @xcite stationary vacuum black holes myers perry obtained charged static black holes higher dimensional em theory charged rotating black holes not obtained in closed form pure em theory holes known for low energy effective actions string theory higher dimensional black holes interest brane - world theories possibility direct observation in future high energy colliders theoretical study appealing finding black holes solutions higher dimensions difficult due to size complexity equations topology horizon not unique higher dimensions ringlike configurations allowed @xcite number of solutions known in closed form limited alternative techniques study black holes analyze black holes by numerical perturbative method concentrate on einstein - maxwell - dilaton ) theory in @xmath2 dimensionsclassical emd action reads @xmath3 scalar curvature dilaton field electromagnetic field tensor electromagnetic potential dilaton coupling constant equations motion varying action metric dilaton field gauge potential yielding @xmath13 theory reduces to pure em theory equations admit analytical solution when dilaton coupling constant @xmath8 takes kaluza - klein value @xmath14 generate charged rotating solutions for values @xmath8 topology horizon spherical black holes stationary axisymmetric stationary axisymmetric black holes @xmath2 dimensions possess independent angular momenta @xmath17 orthogonal planes rotation @xmath19 denotes integer part @xmath20 rotation group @xmath21 black hole solutions fall even-@xmath2 odd-@xmath2-solutions @xmath18 angular momenta equal - magnitude symmetry black holes enhanced odd dimensions symmetry increases from @xmath22 to @xmath23 changing problem from cohomogeneity-@xmath18 to cohomogeneity-1 original system partial differential equations variables reduces to ordinary differential equationsfocus case @xmath2 odd angular momenta same magnitude topology horizon sphere tractable numerically perturbatively metric gauge potential dilaton field parametrized angular dependence @xmath24 \frac{n}{f } r^2 \sum_{k=1}^n\prod_{l=0}^{k-1 }\cos^2 \theta_l \right\sin^2\theta_k\varepsilon}_k d{\varphi}_k \frac{\omega}{r }\right)^2 \nonumber \frac{m - n}{f } r^2 \sum_{k=1}^n\prod_{l=0}^{k-1 }^2 \theta_l^2\theta_k d{\varphi}_k^2\sum_{k=1}^n\prod_{l=0}^{k-1 }^2 \theta_l \right^2\theta_k\varepsilon}_k d{\varphi}_k\right]^2 dt^2{metric}\end{aligned} @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 rotation @xmath33-th orthogonal planespacetime @xmath34 killing vectors @xmath37 parametrization employs isotropic coordinates appropriate for numerical purposes @xcite perturbative purposes boyer - lindquist coordinates simplify algebra @xcite solutions to black holes event horizon at @xmath38 condition @xmath39 @xcite event horizon killing horizon killing vector @xmath40 null orthorgonal to horizon @xmath41 constant horizon angular velocity system of ode s eqs substituted in eqs fe1]-[fe3 supplemented with boundary conditions horizon regular spacetime asymptotically flat @xcite system of ode s solved numerical solver accurate results numerical parameters @xmath42 @xmath43 electric charge varying parameters families of solutions values physical properties mass @xmath44 angular momentum domain of existence of black holes in higher dimensions space bounded by extremal solutions figure 1 domain existence of black holes scaled electric charge @xmath46 angular momentum @xmath47 domain depends on dilaton coupling constant @xmath8 dimension @xmath2accuracy numerical method tested by analytical kk solutions exact relations smarr mass formula black holes satisfy @xcite complementary method perturbations generate black hole solutions higher dimensions advantage method produces analytical formulae numerical method not validity formulae limited by accuracy order perturbations good perturbative parameter charged rotating black hole solutions higher dimensions is electric charge starts from mp solution @xcite expands gauge potential dilaton in series expansions electric charge around mp solution see @xcite series substituted in eqs fe1]-[fe3 ] solved order by order electric charge lower orders equations easy to solve order perturbations increases difficult important point perturbative method integration constants fixed impose regularity solutions at horizon condition asymptotic flatness smarr mass formula useful check accuracy solutions perturbative method applied to extremal solutions formulae simplify obtains formula gyromagnetic factor @xmath48 to second order @xmath49 gyromagnetic factor not constant for pure em solutions ( @xmath13 ) both methods different range applicability region where both valid when electric charge smallregion check consistency methods agreement @xcite presented figure 1 perturbative formula eq . [ gfactor ] extremal solutions compared non - perturbative results @xmath50 @xmath51 both approches good agreement perturbative method modified analyze slowly rotating solutions using solution tangherlini solution angular momentum perturbative parameter two methods complementary powerful tool analyze black holes higher dimensions analytical solutions not available | 0.355435 | 2,230 | 1,134 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,877 | we study the dependence on the pion mass of the qcd effective charge by employing the dispersion relations for the adler @xmath0 function .
this new massive analytic running coupling is compared to the effective coupling saturated by the dynamically generated gluon mass .
a qualitative picture of the possible impact of the former coupling on the chiral symmetry breaking is presented .
-2.5 mm the basic idea behind the analytic approach to quantum field theory is to supplement the perturbative treatment of the renormalization group ( rg ) formalism with the nonperturbative information encoded in the corresponding dispersion relations @xcite .
the latter , being based on the `` first principles '' of the theory , provide one with the definite analytic properties in the kinematic variable of a physical quantity at hand @xcite . in practice the analytization procedure @xcite amounts to the restoration of the correct analytic properties for a given quantity @xmath1 by imposing the representation @xmath2 here the spectral function @xmath3 can be defined by the initial ( perturbative ) expression for @xmath1 : @xmath4.\ ] ] a distinctive feature of the model for the qcd analytic invariant charge @xmath5
@xcite is the application of the analytization procedure ( [ defan ] ) to the perturbative expansion of the rg @xmath6 function : @xmath7^{j+1}\!\right\}_{\!\!\mbox{\scriptsize an}}\!\!.\ ] ] here @xmath8 denotes the @xmath9-loop perturbative running coupling , @xmath10 , and @xmath11 is the @xmath6 function expansion coefficient . at the one - loop level
the renormalization group equation ( [ anrgeq ] ) can be solved explicitly : @xmath12 where @xmath13 stands for the spacelike momentum .
the solution to eq .
( [ anrgeq ] ) can also be represented in the form of the integral @xmath14 where the one - loop spectral density is @xmath15 and the explicit expression for the @xmath9-loop @xmath16 can be found in ref .
@xcite .
the model ( [ aic1l ] ) shares all the advantages of the analytic approach : it contains no unphysical singularities at @xmath13 and possesses good higher loop and scheme stability .
besides , it has proved to be successful in description of hadron dynamics of the both perturbative and intrinsically nonperturbative nature .
it is worth noting that the massless analytic effective charge ( [ aichlkl ] ) incorporates the ultraviolet asymptotic freedom with the infrared enhancement ( i.e. , the singular behavior at @xmath17 ) in a single expression , see figure [ fig:1 ] . ) ) ( solid curve ) , @xmath18.,title="fig:",width=226 ] -7 mm -5 mm in this talk we will outline how the behavior of the running coupling ( [ aichlkl ] ) is affected by the pion mass entering the adler @xmath0 function , thus giving rise to an infrared finite value for this coupling .
we will also argue that this analytic effective charge may be relevant to the study of chiral symmetry breaking ( csb ) through the schwinger - dyson equations .
a certain insight into the nonperturbative aspects of the strong interaction can be provided by the adler @xmath0 function @xcite @xmath19 with @xmath20 being hadronic vacuum polarization function . in particular , eq .
( [ adlerdef ] ) is related to the measurable ratio @xmath21 of the @xmath22 annihilation into hadrons through the dispersion relation @xcite @xmath23 in turn , this equation implies the definite analytic properties in the @xmath24 variable for @xmath25 : it is an analytic function in the complex @xmath24-plane with the only cut beginning at the two pion threshold @xmath26 along the negative semiaxis of real @xmath24 . in the ultraviolet domain
the adler @xmath0 function is usually computed in the framework of perturbation theory : @xmath27,\ ] ] where @xmath28 is the charge of the @xmath29-th quark , @xmath30 + d_2\left[\frac{{\alpha{^{}_{\mbox{\scriptsize s}}}}(q^2)}{\pi}\right]^2 + \ldots,\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath31 , @xmath32 , and @xmath33 is the number of active quarks
. however , such approximation of eq .
( [ adlerpert ] ) violates the analyticity condition that @xmath25 must satisfy , due to the spurious singularities of the perturbative running coupling @xmath34 .
nevertheless , this difficulty , which is an artifact of the perturbative treatment , can be eliminated by imposing the analyticity requirement of the form @xmath35 on the right hand - side of eq .
( [ adlerpert ] ) .
therefore , the qcd effective charge itself has to satisfy the integral representation @xmath36 where @xmath16 is the @xmath9-loop spectral density @xcite .
the behavior of the one - loop massive analytic charge ( [ aicm ] ) in the spacelike and timelike infrared domains is shown in figure [ fig:2 ] .
the value of @xmath37mev is found by making use of the experimental data on the inclusive @xmath38 lepton decay @xcite .
it is worth noting that the nonvanishing pion mass drastically affects the infrared behavior of the analytic coupling in hand : instead of the enhancement in the massless case ( [ aichlkl ] ) one has here a finite infrared limiting value of the effective charge ( [ aicm ] ) ( see also refs .
@xcite for the details ) . ) in the spacelike and timelike domains .
the values of parameters are : @xmath39 active quarks , @xmath40mev.,title="fig:",width=226 ] -7 mm -5 mm based on the study of the _ gauge invariant _ schwinger - dyson equations , cornwall proposed a long time ago that the self - interactions of gluons give rise to a dynamical gluon mass , while preserving at the same time the local gauge symmetry of the theory @xcite .
this gluon `` mass '' is not a directly measurable quantity , but must be related to other physical parameters , such as the glueball spectrum , the energy needed to pop two gluons out of the vacuum , the qcd string tension , or the qcd vacuum energy .
one of the main phenomenological implications of this analysis is that the presence of the gluon mass @xmath41 saturates the running of the strong coupling , forcing it to `` freeze '' in the infrared domain .
in particular , the nonperturbative effective coupling obtained in ref .
@xcite is given by @xmath42},\ ] ] where @xmath43 is the dynamical gluon mass @xmath44^{-12/11}.\ ] ] the coupling ( [ jmc ] ) has the infrared finite limiting value @xmath45^{-1}$ ] . for a typical values of @xmath46mev and @xmath47mev ,
one obtains for the case of pure gluodynamics ( @xmath48 ) an estimation @xmath49 .
an independent analysis @xcite yields a maximum allowed value for @xmath50 of about 0.6 .
the incorporation of fermions into the effective charge @xcite @xmath51 does not change the picture qualitatively ( at least for quark masses of the order of @xmath52 ) . in equation ( [ jprc ] ) @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55mev stands for the gluon mass and @xmath56mev is a light quark constituent mass . the effective coupling of eq .
( [ jmc ] ) was the focal point of extensive scrutiny , and has been demonstrated to furnish a unified description of a wide variety of the low energy qcd data @xcite .
however , an important unresolved question in this context is the incorporation of the qcd effective charge into the standard schwinger - dyson equation governing the dynamics of the quark propagator @xmath57 @xmath58 specifically , since qcd is not a fixed point theory , the usual qed - inspired gap equation must be modified , in order to incorporate the running charge and asymptotic freedom .
the usual way of accomplishing this eventually boils down to the replacement @xmath59 in the corresponding kernel of the gap equation , where @xmath60 is the qcd running coupling .
the inclusion of @xmath60 is essential for arriving at an integral equation for @xmath57 which is well - behaved in the ultraviolet .
however , since the perturbative form of @xmath60 diverges at low energies as @xmath61 when @xmath62 , some form of the infrared regularization for @xmath60 is needed , whose details depend on the specific assumptions one is making regarding the nonperturbative hadron dynamics . at this point
the issue of the critical coupling makes its appearance . specifically , as is well - known
, there is a critical infrared limiting value of the running coupling , to be denoted by @xmath63 , below which there are no nontrivial solutions to the resulting gap equation , i.e. , there is no csb , see fig .
[ fig:3 ] . on the limiting value @xmath64 , @xmath65.,title="fig:",width=226 ] -7 mm -5 mm the incorporation of the effective charge of eq .
( [ jmc ] ) into a gap equation has been studied for the first time in ref .
@xcite .
there it was concluded that csb solutions for @xmath66 could be obtained only for unnaturally small values of the gluon mass , namely @xmath67 .
this is so because the typical value of @xmath63 found in the standard treatment of the gap equation is @xmath68 , which is what the expression for @xmath50 yields for the above value of @xmath69 .
this issue was further investigated in ref .
@xcite , where a system of coupled gap and vertex equations was considered .
the upshot of this study was that no consistent solutions to the system of integral equations could be found , due to the fact that the allowed values for @xmath64 , dictated by the vertex equation , were significantly lower than @xmath50 , i.e. , not large enough to trigger chiral symmetry breaking . ) , solid curves ) with the effective charge ( [ jprc ] ) ( dashed curves ) .
the values of parameters are : @xmath39 active quarks , @xmath70mev ( a ) , @xmath71mev ( b ) , gluon mass @xmath72mev and @xmath73mev ( c ) , gluon mass @xmath74mev and @xmath75mev ( d).,title="fig:",width=226 ] -7 mm -7 mm in what follows we will suggest a possible resolution of this problem .
the basic observation is captured in figure [ fig:4 ] : the effective charge with a gluon mass ( dashed curves ) and the analytic charge ( [ aicm ] ) ( solid curves ) coincide for a large range of momenta , and they only begin to differ appreciably in the deep infrared domain ( @xmath76 ) . in this region the analytic charge ( [ aicm ] ) rises abruptly , almost doubling its size between @xmath77 and @xmath78 , whereas the running coupling ( [ jprc ] ) in the same momentum interval remains essentially fixed to a value of about 0.6 .
a possible picture that seems to emerge from this observation is the following .
it may be that the concept of the dynamically generated gluon mass fails to capture all the relevant dynamics in the very deep infrared , where confinement or other nonperturbative effects make their appearance . at that point
it may be preferable to switch to a description in terms of the analytic charge ( [ aicm ] ) , which ( i ) coincides with that of cornwall in the region where the latter furnishes a successful description of data , and ( ii ) in addition , because it overcomes the critical value @xmath63 , offers the possibility of accounting for csb at the level of gap equations .
it would be interesting to carry out a detailed study of the gap equation , with the analytic charged plugged into , in order to verify if indeed one encounters nontrivial solutions , whose size is phenomenologically relevant , and if a reasonable value of the pion - decay constant @xmath79 may be obtained . | authors thank professors d.v .
shirkov , a.e .
dorokhov , i.l .
solovtsov , and n. stefanis for the stimulating discussions .
thanks the organizers of qcd 04 for their hospitality .
the work has been supported by grants rfbr ( 02 - 01 - 00601 , 04 - 02 - 81025 ) , ns-2339.2003.2 , and cicyt fpa20002 - 00612 .
nesterenko and j. papavassiliou , in preparation .
cornwall , phys .
d * 26 * , 1453 ( 1982 ) .
cornwall and j. papavassiliou , phys .
d * 40 * , 3474 ( 1989 ) .
j. papavassiliou and j.m .
cornwall , phys .
d * 44 * , 1285 ( 1991 ) .
aguilar , a. mihara and a.a .
natale , int .
j. mod .
a * 19 * , 249 ( 2004 ) .
b. haeri and m.b .
haeri , phys . rev .
d * 43 * , 3732 ( 1991 ) . | authors thank professors shirkov dorokhov solovtsov stefanis discussions organizers qcd 04 hospitality work supported grants rfbr 02 - 01 - 00601 04 - 02 - 81025 ns-2339.2003.2 cicyt fpa20002 - 00612 nesterenko papavassiliou preparation cornwall. 26 * 1453 ( 1982 ) cornwall papavassiliou 40 3474 1989 ) papavassiliou cornwall 44 1285 ( 1991 ) aguilar mihara natale 19 * 249 ( 2004 ) haeri d 43 * 3732 ( 1991 ) | 0.070413 | 294 | 157 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,890 | deep inelastic scattering at small @xmath0 can be described very effectively using saturation inspired dipole models .
we investigate whether such models are compatible with the numerical solutions of the balitsky - kovchegov ( bk ) equation which is expected to describe the nonlinear evolution in @xmath0 of the dipole cross section .
we find that the bk equation yields results that are qualitatively different from those of phenomenological studies .
geometric scaling is recovered only towards asymptotic rapidities . in this
limit the value of the anomalous dimension @xmath1 at the saturation scale approaches approximately @xmath2 , in contrast to the value @xmath3 commonly used in the models . at small @xmath0 , deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) can be described as the scattering of a color dipole , which the photon fluctuates into , off the proton @xcite .
the linear bfkl equation , which describes the dipole - proton interaction in terms of gluon ladders , predicts an exponential growth of the corresponding cross section as @xmath4 increases , potentially violating unitarity .
hence , interactions between bfkl gluon ladders may become important , which leads to a nonlinear evolution approximately described by the balitsky - kovchegov ( bk ) equation @xcite . as a consequence of the nonlinearity , the dipole cross section saturates with decreasing @xmath0 , thereby offering a resolution to the unitarity problem .
the inclusive hera data at low @xmath0 ( @xmath5 ) could be described well by a dipole cross section of the form @xmath6 , where the scattering amplitude @xmath7 is given by @xcite @xmath8 , \label{ngbw}\ ] ] @xmath9 denotes the transverse size of the dipole , @xmath10 and the @xmath0-dependence of the saturation scale is given by @xmath11 , where @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
the scattering amplitude depends on @xmath0 and @xmath14 through the combination @xmath15 only , which is known as geometric scaling and leads to the prediction that the structure function @xmath16 is a function of @xmath17 only .
this prediction was checked in a model independent way @xcite and holds widely even though the gbw model ( [ ngbw ] ) is not applicable at large @xmath18 .
it should be mentioned that the leading order bk equation leads to a faster evolution in @xmath0 @xcite ( @xmath19 where @xmath20 ) than the experimental data seem to favor ( @xmath13 ) .
this discrepancy can be reduced by introducing a running coupling constant .
hadron production in @xmath21-@xmath22 collisions can also be described by saturation inspired dipole models @xcite . however , these data seem to require geometric scaling violation . the dipole scattering amplitude modified in this respect
is given by @xcite @xmath23\ , .
\label{ngamma}\ ] ] the exponent @xmath24 is usually referred to as the `` anomalous dimension '' , although the connection of @xmath25 with the gluon distribution may not be clear for all cases considered below . following partly @xcite , in @xcite a few requirements were used to determine a parameterization of @xmath24 .
firstly , one assumes that @xmath1 approaches 1 in the limit @xmath26 .
therefore the `` dglap '' limit @xmath27 is recovered for all @xmath0 .
secondly , at the saturation scale , @xmath28 , @xmath24 should be constant to ensure geometric scaling in this region .
this constant @xmath29 is chosen to be @xmath30 .
the value of @xmath29 is motivated by a saddle point analysis of a solution of the bfkl equation with saturation boundary conditions @xcite and also shows up in the traveling wave approach @xcite .
thirdly , if one writes @xmath31 , then @xmath32 should decrease as @xmath33 for @xmath34 at fixed @xmath35 .
this ensures that geometric scaling is asymptotically recovered .
furthermore , the parameters were adjusted in such a way that geometric scaling holds approximately for finite @xmath36 in a growing region between @xmath37 and roughly @xmath38 .
note that the parameterization in @xcite is intended to describe @xmath39 in this so - called extended geometric scaling region only . to simplify the procedure of the required fourier transformation of @xmath25 ( [ ngamma ] )
, @xmath1 was replaced in @xcite by @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the transverse momentum of the scattered parton that will fragment into the final state hadron .
we want to check whether these requirements for @xmath1 are compatible with the nonlinear evolution of the dipole scattering amplitude @xmath25 .
the bk equation for @xmath25 reads @xcite @xmath42 & -n{\left}(|\vec{x}_t-\vec{y}_t|,x{\right})-n{\left}(|\vec{x}_t-\vec{z}_t|,x{\right } ) n{\left}(|\vec{z}_t-\vec{y}_t|,x{\right } ) \big ] .
\label{bk}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath43 .
we will not consider the impact parameter dependence of @xmath25 .
the bksolver program @xcite provides a numerical solution of the amplitude @xmath44 in momentum space . in order to use this solution of the bk equation ( [ bk ] ) to constrain @xmath1 ,
one first has to find @xmath39 by fourier transforming to coordinate space : @xmath45 using the ansatz ( [ ngamma ] ) one can extract @xmath1 from the resulting @xmath39 , @xmath46/ \log[r^2\,q_s^2(x)]\ , .
\label{gammar}\ ] ] this equation requires as a separate input the value of @xmath47 , which can be found by equating the right hand sides of eqs .
( [ ngamma ] ) and ( [ fourier ] ) for @xmath28 . combining the resulting values of @xmath48 with eq .
( [ gammar ] ) , we obtain a numerical result for @xmath1 , which is shown in fig .
[ gammar1_fig]a . a ) @xmath1 resulting from the relations ( [ fourier ] ) and ( [ gammar ] ) as a function of @xmath49 and @xmath50 .
b ) @xmath51 as a function of @xmath52 for various rapidities @xmath50.,title="fig:",width=260 ] a ) @xmath1 resulting from the relations ( [ fourier ] ) and ( [ gammar ] ) as a function of @xmath49 and @xmath50 .
b ) @xmath51 as a function of @xmath52 for various rapidities @xmath50.,title="fig:",width=260 ] the resulting @xmath1 has the following features : 1 . for @xmath53 , @xmath1 asymptotically approaches 1 . 2 . at the saturation scale , @xmath1 is not a constant .
3 . for decreasing @xmath0
, @xmath1 approaches a limiting curve , @xmath54 , indicated in fig .
[ gammar1_fig ] by @xmath55 .
hence , after a longer evolution one indeed recovers geometric scaling .
the fact that for small distances @xmath24 asymptotically approaches 1 is understandable from the bk equation , since in this limit it reduces to the bfkl equation . in the limit of small distances ,
the solution to the bfkl equation is dominated by either the saddle point or the initial condition , both leading to @xmath56 , since here we use the mv model as the initial condition , see @xcite for details .
it turns out that @xmath24 is clearly not constant , not even at @xmath28 , unlike in @xcite .
however , asymptotically geometric scaling is recovered as @xmath24 approaches @xmath57 .
writing @xmath58 it turns out that , similar to the parameterizations used in @xcite , @xmath59 decreases as @xmath33 for @xmath60 and fixed @xmath61 . at the saturation scale @xmath24
is given in the small-@xmath0 limit by @xmath62 which is significantly below @xmath63 .
this is not in disagreement with theoretical expectations @xcite .
rather it indicates that requiring @xmath24 in eq .
( [ ngamma ] ) to be constant at @xmath48 does not follow from the bk equation . in @xcite ,
@xmath39 ( [ ngamma ] ) was considered with @xmath1 replaced by @xmath40 .
this approximation scheme we will discuss next .
the procedure of extracting @xmath24 becomes quite different when @xmath24 depends on @xmath41 , since the dipole cross section @xmath25 then depends on both @xmath14 and @xmath41 , so that it is not related to @xmath64 by a straightforward inverse fourier transform ( [ fourier ] ) anymore : @xmath65{\right})\ , .
\label{nk2}\ ] ] instead of by using the inverse fourier transform , we will extract @xmath24 by numerically solving eq .
( [ nk2 ] ) , imposing the following condition .
in order to test the ansatz in @xcite , we will fix @xmath51 in such a way that it equals the constant @xmath66 at the saturation scale .
the @xmath0-dependence of @xmath48 is determined by explicitly solving eq .
( [ nk2 ] ) for @xmath67 and @xmath68 .
now we can extract @xmath24 from relation ( [ nk2 ] ) for any given value of @xmath0 and @xmath41 .
fig .
[ gammar1_fig ] shows the results for @xmath51 as a function of @xmath69 above @xmath48 , for a broad range of rapidities . for small rapidities
the resulting @xmath24 looks very similar to the one in @xcite ( cf .
fig . 4 of ref .
@xcite ) .
as one can see , for larger @xmath36 the resulting @xmath24 is not compatible with the parameterization in @xcite anymore ; it first decreases before it rises towards 1 asymptotically . for a discussion of additional important issues like the dependence on initial conditions , the @xmath0-dependence of @xmath48 in our approach and the running coupling case we refer to @xcite . | the numerical solutions of the bk equation do not display exact geometric scaling , although they approach a solution showing such scaling at asymptotic @xmath36 . assuming the solutions to be of the form ( [ ngamma ] ) , where scaling violations are encoded in the `` anomalous dimension '' @xmath24
, therefore leads to the conclusion that @xmath1 is not a function of @xmath61 exclusively .
in particular , it is never simply a constant , not even at the saturation scale ( @xmath28 ) . at
asymptotically large rapidities , @xmath24 reaches a limiting function @xmath54 .
this function is universal for a large range of initial conditions @xcite . at the saturation scale
, @xmath57 equals approximately @xmath2 , which is considerably smaller than the corresponding values in the phenomenological models @xcite . for small values of @xmath70
the limiting function seems to reach @xmath29 @xcite , in accordance with the traveling wave results of refs .
@xcite . performing the replacement of @xmath71
does allow one to find a solution for which @xmath72 is kept fixed .
the behavior of @xmath40 is then for small rapidities qualitatively similar to the parameterization in @xcite .
however , the usually considered choice @xmath73 yields some unwanted features , i.e. @xmath74 being negative in a region above the saturation scale and the absence of solutions below the saturation scale , although the ansatz was not intended for that region . keeping @xmath72 fixed at a smaller value , e.g. at @xmath75 , seems more suitable @xcite , but it remains to be investigated whether such a choice allows for a good fit of all relevant dis , @xmath21-@xmath22 and @xmath76-@xmath76 data
. it would be interesting to consider modifications of phenomenological models for the dipole scattering amplitude that are compatible with both the bk equation and the data .
given the fact that the bk evolution does not respect geometric scaling around @xmath48 , phenomenological parameterizations that reflect this feature would seem a natural choice .
fortunately , the lhc and a possible future electron - ion collider will provide data over a larger range of momenta and rapidities , so that one can expect to test the evolution properties of the models more accurately .
99 slides : + ` http://indico.cern.ch/contributiondisplay.py?contribid=69&sessionid=15&confid=9499 ` a. h. mueller , nucl .
b * 335 * , 115 ( 1990 ) .
i. balitsky , nucl .
b * 463 * , 99 ( 1996 ) ; y. v. kovchegov , phys .
d * 60 * , 034008 ( 1999 ) .
k. golec - biernat and m. wsthoff , phys .
d * 59 * , 014017 ( 1999 ) .
a. m. stasto , k. golec - biernat and j. kwiecinski , phys .
lett . * 86 * , 596 ( 2001 ) .
a. h. mueller and d. n. triantafyllopoulos , nucl .
b * 640 * , 331 ( 2002 ) .
d. kharzeev , y.v .
kovchegov and k. tuchin , phys . lett .
b * 599 * , 23 ( 2004 ) .
a. dumitru , a. hayashigaki and j. jalilian - marian , nucl .
phys . a * 765 * , 464 ( 2006 ) .
a. dumitru , a. hayashigaki and j. jalilian - marian , nucl .
a * 770 * , 57 ( 2006 ) .
e. iancu , k. itakura and s. munier , phys .
b * 590 * , 199 ( 2004 ) .
s. munier and r. peschanski , phys .
lett . * 91 * , 232001 ( 2003 ) ; phys .
d * 69 * , 034008 ( 2004 ) .
r. enberg , `` bksolver : numerical solution of the balitsky - kovchegov nonlinear integro - differential equation '' , available at url : http://www.isv.uu.se/@xmath77enberg / bk/. | numerical solutions bk equation display exact geometric scaling approach solution at asymptotic @xmath36 assuming solutions form [ ngamma ] ) scaling violations encoded in anomalous dimension @xmath24 @xmath1 not function of @xmath61 never constant not even at saturation scale @xmath28 ) at large rapidities @xmath24 reaches limiting function @xmath54 function universal for large range initial conditions @xcite saturation scale @xmath57 equals @xmath2 smaller than values in phenomenological models @xcite for small values @xmath70 limiting function @xmath29 @xcite traveling wave results replacement of @xmath71 solution for @xmath72 fixed behavior of @xmath40 for small rapidities similar to parameterization @xcite choice @xmath73 yields unwanted features @xmath74 negative region above saturation scale absence of solutions below keeping @xmath72 fixed at smaller value @xmath75 suitable good fit of relevant @xmath21-@xmath22- data consider modifications phenomenological models for dipole scattering amplitude compatible with bk equation databk evolution respect geometric scaling @xmath48 phenomenological parameterizations lhc future electron - ion collider provide data momenta rapidities test evolution properties 99 slides http://indico.cern.ch/contributiondisplay=69=15=9499 h mueller nucl b 335 * 115 ( 1990 ) balitsky nucl 463 * 99 ( 1996 ) kovchegov phys d 60 * 034008 ( 1999 ) k golec - biernat m wsthoff phys . d 59 * 014017 ( 1999 ) stasto golec - biernat j. kwiecinski 86 * 596 ( 2001 ) h mueller triantafyllopoulos nucl b 640 * 331 ( 2002 ) kharzeev kovchegov k tuchin phys 599 * 23 ( 2004 ). dumitru hayashigaki jalilian - marian 765 464 ( 2006 ) 770 * 57 ( 2006 ). iancu itakura s. munier phys 590 * 199 ( 2004 ) munier r. peschanski physlett 91 232001 2003 phys 69 034008 2004 enberg numerical solution balitsky - kovchegov nonlinear integro - differential equation http://www.isv.uu.se@xmath77enberg | 0.178981 | 1,020 | 524 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,894 | in @xmath0 , danielsen and parker @xcite proved that every self - dual additive code over @xmath1 is equivalent to a graph code .
so , graph is an important tool for searching ( proposed ) optimum codes . in this paper
, we introduce a new method of searching ( proposed ) optimum additive codes from circulant graphs .
+ * ams subject classification 2010 * : 94b05 , 05c50 , 05c25 . | we define @xmath2 , where @xmath3 . an additive code @xmath4 over @xmath1 of length @xmath5 is an additive subgroup of @xmath1 .
clearly , @xmath6 contains codewords for some @xmath7 , and can be defined by a @xmath8 generator matrix , with entries from @xmath1 , whose rows span @xmath6 additively .
we call @xmath6 an @xmath9 code .
the _ hamming weight _ of @xmath10 , denoted by @xmath11 , is the number of non zero components of @xmath12 .
the _ hamming distance _ between two vectors @xmath13 , @xmath14 is @xmath15 .
the _ minimum distance _
@xmath16 of a code is defined as the smallest possible distance between pairs of distinct codewords .
the _ conjugation _ of @xmath17 is defined by @xmath18 , and the _ trace map _ is defined by @xmath19 .
hermitian trace inner product _ of @xmath13 and @xmath14 , with @xmath20 , is given by @xmath21 .
we define _ the dual of the code _ @xmath6 with respect to the hermitian trace inner product , @xmath22
. then @xmath23 is _ self - orthogonal _ if @xmath24 , and @xmath6 is _ self - dual _ if @xmath25 .
a graph code is an additive code over @xmath1 that has a generator matrix of the form @xmath26 , where @xmath27 is the identity matrix and @xmath28 is the adjacency matrix of a simple undirected graph .
a code is called _ optimum _ if it meets both lower and upper bounds in the code tables , and a _ proposed optimum _
code if it only meets the lower bound in the code tables .
the distribution of a code is the sequence @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the number of codewords of weight @xmath31 .
the _ weight enumerator _ of the code is the polynomial @xmath32 let us now introduce some concepts and notions from graph theory .
an _ undirected graph _
@xmath33 is a set @xmath34 of vertices together with a collection @xmath35 of edges , where each edge is an unordered pair of vertices .
the vertices @xmath36 and @xmath37 are _ adjacent _ if @xmath38 is an edge .
then @xmath37 is a _
neighbour _ of @xmath39 .
all the neighbours of vertex @xmath39 in graph @xmath28 form the _ neighbourhood _ of @xmath39 , and it is denoted by @xmath40 .
the _ degree of a vertex _
@xmath41 is the number of vertices adjacent to @xmath41 .
a graph is _ k - regular _ if all vertices have the same degree @xmath42 .
the _ adjacency matrix _
@xmath43 of a graph @xmath33 is a symmetric @xmath44-matrix defined as follows : @xmath45 if the @xmath31-th and @xmath46-th vertices are adjacent , and @xmath47 otherwise .
circulant graphs and their various applications are the objects of intensive study in computer science and discrete mathematics , see @xcite .
recently , monakhova published a survey paper on this subject , see @xcite .
let @xmath48 be a set of integers such that @xmath49 and let the vertices of an @xmath5-vertex graph be labelled @xmath50 .
then the _ ciculant graph _
@xmath51 has @xmath52 adjacent to each vertex @xmath31 .
a _ circulant matrix _ is obtained by taking an arbitrary first row , and shifting it cyclically one position to the right in order to obtain successive rows .
we say that a circulant matrix is generated by its first row .
formally , if the first row of an @xmath5-by-@xmath5 circualant matrix is @xmath53 , then the @xmath54 element is @xmath55 , where subscripts are taken modulo @xmath5 .
the term circulant graph arises from the fact that the adjacency matrix for such a graph is a circulant matrix .
for example , figure [ fig1 ] shows the circulant graph @xmath56 . [ 0.6 ] + figure 1 : the circulant graph @xmath56 [ fig1 ] in @xmath57 , tonchev @xcite first set up a relationship between a linear binary code and the adjacency matrix of an undirected graph . in @xmath0 , danielsen and parker
@xcite proved that every self - dual additive code over @xmath1 is equivalent to a graph code . recently , finding optimum codes from graphs has received a wide attention of many researchers , see @xcite . in @xcite ,
danielsen and parker showed that two codes are equivalent if and only if the corresponding graphs are equivalent with respect to local complementation and graph isomorphism .
they used these facts to classify all codes of length up to @xmath58 . in 2012
, danielsen @xcite focused his attention on additive codes over @xmath59 and transformed the problem of code equivalence into a problem of graph isomorphism . by an extension technique , they classified all optimal codes of lengths @xmath60 and @xmath58 .
in fact , a computer search reveals that circulant graph codes usually contain many strong codes , and some of these codes have highly regular graph representations , see @xcite . in @xcite , danielsen obtained some optimum additive codes from circulant graphs in 2005 .
later , varbanov investigated additive circulant graph codes over @xmath1 , see @xcite . in this paper
, we find out some optimum additive codes from some special circulant graphs .
this paper is organized as follows . in section @xmath61
, we propose a new method to find additive optimum codes from circulant graphs .
inspired by the optimum additive codes obtained by danielsen @xcite , we focus on the dense circulant graphs and get some optimum additive codes in section @xmath62 .
in fact , glynn et al .
@xcite obtained an optimum code from a circulant graph , called 5-valent graph .
recall that @xmath63 is a circulant graph of order @xmath58 ; see figure 1 @xmath64 .
[ 0.6 ] + figure 1 : @xmath64 a @xmath65-valent graph @xmath63 ; @xmath66 the circulant graph @xmath67 . let @xmath68 . for the vertex @xmath69 ,
we let @xmath70 . for the vertex @xmath71
, we just rotate the above vertices and edges , that is , we only permit the existence of the set @xmath72 of edges . for each vertex @xmath73
, we can also obtained the sets @xmath74 of edges .
observe that @xmath75 .
the adjacency matrix of the graph @xmath63 is the following circulant matrix .
@xmath76 the above matrix can also be obtained by the following vector @xmath77 observe that this vector just corresponds to the set @xmath78 of edges , which is an expression of the adjacent relation about the vertex @xmath69 .
we conclude that a @xmath65-valent graph can be determined by the edge set @xmath78 , and the adjacency matrix of this graph is determined by the above vector @xmath79 .
furthermore , the matrix @xmath80 is @xmath81 this matrix is also a circulant matrix , which can be obtained by the following vector @xmath82 from the matrix @xmath80 , we can get a graph code @xmath83 . from the code tables , we know that @xmath84 is an optimum additive code over @xmath1 . then @xmath85 and @xmath86 , where @xmath87 is the minimum distance of the code @xmath83 .
the above statement suggests the following method for finding optimum codes .
* step 1 . * given an even integer @xmath5 .
denote by @xmath88 the lower bound of the additive code ( @xmath5,@xmath89 ) over @xmath1 . from code tables , we find the exact value of @xmath88 for the given @xmath5 .
we now construct a circulant graph @xmath90 by a set @xmath78 of edges as follows .
* step 1.1 . *
arrange the vertices from @xmath91 in a circular order .
* step 1.2 . *
determine the set @xmath78 of edges satisfying @xmath92 or @xmath93 , where @xmath94 . if @xmath93 , then @xmath95 if @xmath92 , then @xmath96 * step 2 .
* by the edge set @xmath78 , we write the vector @xmath97 corresponding to @xmath78 . if @xmath93 , then @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath103@xmath104 @xmath105 if @xmath92 , then @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath106 @xmath101 @xmath107 @xmath103@xmath104 @xmath105 * step 3 . * change the first component of the vector @xmath97 to @xmath108 .
denote by @xmath109 the new vector .
we generate a circulant matrix @xmath110 from @xmath109 .
@xmath111 * step 4 .
* by algorithm @xmath112 , we obtain the minimum distance @xmath113 of the code @xmath114 and determine whether @xmath115 .
if so , the code @xmath114 is a proposed optimum code .
below is an algorithm ( running in sage ) .
for more details , we refer to @xcite . ' '' '' + * algorithm * 1 : minimum distance of a circulant graph code + ' '' '' + input : the value of @xmath5 , the generator vector @xmath97 of a circulant graph code @xmath116 + objective : the minimum distance of the circulant graph code @xmath116 + 1 .
input the value of @xmath5 , the generator vector @xmath117 ; + 2 .
obtain the generator matrix @xmath118 of the circulant graph code @xmath116 ; + 3 .
get the minimum distance of the circulant graph code @xmath116 .
+ take an example , let @xmath119 and @xmath120 .
+ the algorithm details are stated as follows : + _ program _ : + @xmath121 + @xmath119 ; + @xmath122 $ ] + @xmath123 $ ] for @xmath31 in @xmath124 $ ] for @xmath42 in @xmath125)$ ] ; + @xmath126,s))$ ] ; + @xmath127 $ ] ; + for @xmath42 in @xmath128 $ ] : + @xmath129 for @xmath31 in subsets @xmath130)$ ] ; + @xmath131 $ ] ; + print @xmath132 ; + _ output _ : [ 8 ] + [ 8 , 8 ] + [ 8 , 8 , 10 ] + [ 8 , 8 , 10 , 8 ] + [ 8 , 8 , 10 , 8 , 8 ] + [ 8 , 8 , 10 , 8 , 8 , 8 ] + [ 8 , 8 , 10 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 8 ] + [ 8 , 8 , 10 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 10 ] + _ result _ : the minimum element of the last array is the minimum distance @xmath133 of the code @xmath134 , + that is , @xmath135 .
+ ' '' '' inspired by the graph code @xmath136 which corresponds to the @xmath65-valent graph , we hope to find out some other optimum additive codes for @xmath119 .
* recall @xmath137 is the lower bound of the additive code @xmath138 over @xmath1 . from code tables ,
we find the exact value of @xmath137 , @xmath139 .
we now construct a circulant graph @xmath67 by a set @xmath78 of edges as follows .
* step 1.1 . *
arrange the vertices from @xmath140 in a circular order .
* step 1.2 . *
determine the set @xmath78 of edges satisfying @xmath141 or @xmath142 , where @xmath94 .
if @xmath143 , then @xmath144 if @xmath145 , then @xmath146 in this case , the circulant graph @xmath67 can be found out ; see figure 1 @xmath66 . * step 2 .
* by the edge set @xmath78 , we write the vector @xmath147 corresponding to @xmath78 . if @xmath143 , then @xmath148 if @xmath145 , then @xmath149 * step 3 .
* change the first component of the vector @xmath147 to @xmath108 .
denote by @xmath150 the new vector .
we generate a circulant matrix @xmath151(@xmath152 ) from @xmath150(@xmath153 ) .
@xmath154 @xmath155 * step 4 . * by algorithm @xmath112 , we obtain the minimum distance @xmath156 .
therefore , both @xmath157 and @xmath158 are proposed optimum codes over @xmath1 .
the weight enumerators of the codes @xmath157 and @xmath158 are @xmath159 @xmath160 applying the above method , we can obtain optimum graph codes over @xmath1 from the first two generator vector . ' '' '' + @xmath5 @xmath16 @xmath88 first row of generator matrix + ' '' '' + @xmath161 @xmath162 @xmath162 + @xmath163 @xmath164 @xmath164 + @xmath161 @xmath162 @xmath162 + @xmath165 @xmath166 @xmath166 + ' '' ''
from the above section , we see that the circulant graphs under our consideration are all relatively sparse .
so one may think that only sparse circulant graphs produce optimum graph codes .
the following fact gives it a negative answer .
danielsen @xcite obtained an optimum additive code @xmath167 from the vector @xmath168 which corresponds to a circulant graph of order @xmath169 such that its adjacent matrix @xmath170 is generated by the first row @xmath171 it is clear that the circulant graph is @xmath172-regular .
note that the order of this graph is @xmath169 , so the degree of each vertex is relatively large , i.e. , it is a relatively dense graph . | define @xmath2 @xmath3 additive code @xmath4 @xmath1 @xmath5 subgroup @xmath1 @xmath6 contains codewords @xmath7 defined @xmath8 generator matrix entries from @xmath1 rows span @xmath6 @xmath6 @xmath9 code hamming weight @xmath10 @xmath11 non zero components @xmath12 hamming distance between vectors @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 minimum distance @xmath16 smallest distance between distinct codewords conjugation @xmath17 defined @xmath18 trace map @xmath19 trace inner product @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath20 @xmath21 define dual code @xmath6 trace inner product @xmath22 @xmath23 self - orthogonal if @xmath24 @xmath6 self - dual @xmath25 graph code additive code over @xmath1 generator matrix form @xmath26 @xmath27 identity matrix @xmath28 adjacency matrix undirected graph code optimum meets lower upper bounds code tables proposed optimum meets lower bound distribution code sequence @xmath29 @xmath30 number codewords weight @xmath31weight enumerator code is polynomial @xmath32 introduce concepts notions graph theory undirected graph @xmath33 set @xmath34 vertices collection @xmath35 edges each edge unordered pair vertices vertices @xmath36 @xmath37 adjacent if @xmath38 edge @xmath37 neighbour of @xmath39 neighbours vertex @xmath39 graph @xmath28 form neighbourhood @xmath39 denoted by @xmath40 degree vertex @xmath41 number vertices adjacent graph k - regular if vertices same degree @xmath42 adjacency matrix @xmath43 of graph @xmath33 symmetric @xmath44-matrix @xmath31-th @xmath46-th vertices adjacent @xmath47 otherwise circulant graphs study in computer science discrete mathematics monakhova published survey paper @xmath48 integers @xmath49 vertices @xmath5-vertex graph labelled @xmath50 ciculant graph @xmath51 has @xmath52 adjacent to each vertex @xmath31 circulant matrix obtained by arbitrary first row shifting cyclically position right successive rows first rowfirst row of @xmath5-by-@xmath5 matrix is @xmath53 @xmath54 element is @xmath55 subscripts taken modulo @xmath5 term circulant graph adjacency matrix circulant figure shows circulant graph @xmath56 in @xmath57 tonchev @xcite set relationship between linear binary code adjacency matrix undirected graph danielsen parker proved self - dual additive code over @xmath1 equivalent to graph code finding optimum codes from graphs attention danielsen parker showed codes equivalent if graphs equivalent local complementation graph isomorphism used codes up to @xmath58 2012 danielsen on additive codes over @xmath59 transformed problem code equivalence into problem graph isomorphism classified optimal codes of lengths @xmath60 and @xmath58 computer search reveals circulant graph codes contain strong codes regular graph representations danielsen obtained optimum additive codes from circulant graphs in 2005 varbanov investigated additive circulant graph codes over @xmath1 paper optimum additive codes from special circulant graphspaper organized section @xmath61 new method find additive optimum codes from circulant graphs inspired codes danielsen @xcite focus on dense circulant graphs optimum additive codes section @xmath62 glynn et al . @xcite obtained optimum code from 5-valent graph @xmath63 circulant graph @xmath58 figure 1 @xmath64 figure @xmath64 @xmath65-valent @xmath63 @xmath66 circulant graph @xmath67 @xmath68 vertex @xmath69 @xmath70 vertex @xmath71 rotate vertices edges permit set @xmath72 edges vertex @xmath73 sets @xmath74 edges @xmath75 adjacency matrix graph @xmath63 circulant matrix @xmath76 matrix obtained vector @xmath77 vector corresponds to set @xmath78 edges expression adjacent relation vertex @xmath69 @xmath65-valent graph determined by edge set @xmath78 adjacency matrix determined by vector @xmath79 matrix @xmath80 @xmath81 circulant matrix obtained by vector @xmath82 matrix @xmath80 graph code @xmath83code tables @xmath84 optimum additive code over @xmath1 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 minimum distance @xmath83 suggests method finding optimum codes step 1 even integer @xmath5 denote @xmath88 lower bound additive code over @xmath1 tables find exact value @xmath88 for @xmath5 construct circulant graph @xmath90 @xmath78 edges arrange vertices from @xmath91 circular order determine set @xmath78 edges satisfying @xmath92 or @xmath93 @xmath93 @xmath95 @xmath92 @xmath96 step 2 edge set @xmath78 write vector @xmath97 corresponding @xmath78 @xmath93 @xmath98 @xmath92 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath106 step 3 change first component vector @xmath97 to @xmath108 denote @xmath109 new vector generate circulant matrix @xmath110 from @xmath109 step 4 algorithm @xmath112 obtain minimum distance @xmath113 of code @xmath114 determine @xmath115 @xmath114 proposed optimum code algorithm sagedetails refer to @xcite algorithm 1 minimum distance of circulant graph code input value of @xmath5 generator vector @xmath97 circulant graph code @xmath116 objective minimum distance of circulant graph code @xmath116 input value @xmath5 generator vector @xmath117 obtain generator matrix @xmath118 of circulant graph code @xmath116 get minimum distance code @xmath116 example @xmath119 and @xmath120 algorithm details program : @xmath121 + @xmath119 ; + @xmath122 $ ] + @xmath123 $ ] @xmath31 in @xmath124 $ @xmath42 in @xmath125)$ ] @xmath126,s))$ ] @xmath127 $ @xmath42 in @xmath128 $ @xmath129 for @xmath31 subsets @xmath130)$ ] @xmath131 $ ] print @xmath132 ; output : [ 8 ] + 8 , 8 ] + 8 , 8 , 10 ] result minimum element last array is minimum distance @xmath133 of code @xmath134 @xmath135 .inspired by graph code @xmath136 @xmath65-valent graph optimum additive codes for @xmath119 @xmath137 lower bound @xmath138 over @xmath1 find value of @xmath137 @xmath139 construct circulant graph @xmath67 @xmath78 edges arrange vertices from @xmath140 circular order determine @xmath78 edges satisfying @xmath141 or @xmath142 @xmath143 @xmath144 @xmath146 circulant graph @xmath67 figure 1 @xmath66 edge set @xmath78 write vector @xmath147 @xmath78 @xmath143 @xmath148 @xmath149 change first component vector @xmath147 to @xmath108 denote @xmath150 new vector generate circulant matrix @xmath151(@xmath152 from @xmath150(@xmath153 4 algorithm @xmath112 obtain minimum distance @xmath156 @xmath157 and @xmath158 proposed optimum codes over @xmath1 weight enumerators of are @xmath159 @xmath160 obtain optimum graph codes over @xmath1 from first generator vector@xmath5 @xmath16 @xmath88 first row generator matrix + @xmath161 @xmath162 + @xmath163 @xmath164 + @xmath161 @xmath162 @xmath165 @xmath166 @xmath166 + circulant graphs sparse sparse produce optimum graph codes negative answer danielsen @xcite obtained optimum additive code @xmath167 from vector @xmath168 corresponds circulant graph @xmath169 adjacent matrix @xmath170 generated first row @xmath171 circulant graph @xmath172-regular order graph @xmath169 degree each vertex large dense graph | 0.497831 | 3,403 | 1,782 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,913 | the @xmath0-zeta function of an infinite graph @xmath1 ( defined previously in a ball around zero ) has an analytic extension . for a tower of finite graphs covered by @xmath1 ,
the normalized zeta functions of the finite graphs converge to the @xmath0-zeta function of @xmath1 . | associated to any finite graph @xmath2 there is a zeta function @xmath3 , @xmath4 . it is defined as an infinite product but shown ( in various different cases ) by ihara , hashimoto , and bass @xcite to be a polynomial .
indeed the rationality formula for a @xmath5 regular @xmath2 states that : @xmath6 here @xmath7 is the adjacency operator of @xmath2 . in @xcite , an @xmath0-zeta function
is defined for noncompact graphs with symmetries , using the machinery of von neumann algebras . a rationality formula similar to expresses the relationship between the zeta function and the von neumann determinant of a laplace operator .
the results of this paper focus on an especial case .
let @xmath1 be an infinite graph which covers a finite graph @xmath8 .
the @xmath0-zeta function @xmath9 is defined in @xcite only in a small neighborhood of zero .
the first result of this paper is to extend the @xmath0-zeta function to the interior of @xmath10\cup [ \frac 1 q , 1]$ ] .
in the second part of the paper , we consider a tower of finite graphs @xmath11 covered by @xmath1 . put @xmath12 . in theorem
[ thm : conv ] we show that the zeta functions for the @xmath11 , renormalized by taking @xmath13 roots , converge to the @xmath0-zeta function for @xmath1 .
the argument is inspired by , and uses , work of lck @xcite .
in the first section we recall the definitions of the zeta functions of finite and infinite graphs .
one of the main results of this paper is theorem [ extension ] in this section . in the second section of this paper
we prove the convergence theorem and exhibit interesting examples .
theorem [ deit ] generalizes work of deitmar @xcite .
in this section we recall the definition of the zeta function and related material .
we first recall the definition of the zeta function for finite graphs . for a graph @xmath2 , let @xmath14 and @xmath15 denote the sets of vertices and edges , respectively , of @xmath2 .
if each vertex has the same degree then @xmath2 is _
regular_. let @xmath2 be a finite graph .
a closed path in @xmath2 is _ primitive _ if it is not a nontrivial power of another path inside the fundamental group of @xmath2 .
let @xmath16 be the set of free homoptopy classes of primitive closed paths of @xmath2 .
then the zeta function of @xmath2 is @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the minimum length of paths in the class of @xmath19 .
let @xmath7 be the adjacency operator of the graph @xmath2 acting on @xmath20 .
for @xmath21 let @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the degree of the vertex @xmath24 .
put @xmath25 .
the ihara rationality formula says that @xmath3 is a polynomial : @xmath26 the zeta function satisfies the following functional equation : ( * ? ? ?
* corollary 3.10 ) @xmath27 where @xmath28 and @xmath29 . for more details and examples
. the following proposition is well known .
a proof can be found in ( * ? ? ?
* page 59 ) .
the zeros of the zeta function for any finite @xmath5 regular graph lie on the set @xmath30 where @xmath31\cup [ \frac 1 q , 1].\ ] ] let @xmath32 be the interior of @xmath30 . then
: [ omega ] if @xmath33 $ ] then @xmath34 $ ] .
let @xmath35 . for @xmath36 to be real
we must have @xmath37 this implies that either @xmath38 or @xmath39 . if @xmath39 then @xmath40 which is negative or zero if @xmath41 is on or outside of the circle @xmath42 . in the case that @xmath38 put @xmath43 .
if @xmath44 has no real root then @xmath44 is always positive .
otherwise @xmath45 then @xmath46 and @xmath47 are non - negative , and @xmath48 is not zero in @xmath49
. therefore @xmath44 will be positive on @xmath50 .
[ nthroot ] for a @xmath5 regular finite graph x , the polynomial @xmath51 has an analytic @xmath52 root on @xmath32 for all @xmath53 . we know
@xmath54 where @xmath55 varies over eigenvalues of the adjacency operator of the graph . then @xmath56 is an analytic @xmath52 root for @xmath51 .
for @xmath57 a countable discrete group , the _ von neumann algebra _ of @xmath57 is the algebra @xmath58 of bounded @xmath57-equivariant operators from @xmath59 to @xmath59 .
the _ von neumann trace _ of an element @xmath60 is defined by @xmath61 for @xmath62 the unit element . for @xmath63 and a bounded @xmath57-equivariant operator @xmath64 ,
define @xmath65 the trace as defined is independent of the decomposition of @xmath66 .
the von neumann trace extends to bounded @xmath57-equivariant operators on hilbert @xmath58-modules , but they will not be needed .
now let @xmath67 be an infinite graph .
suppose the group @xmath57 acts freely on @xmath1 with finite quotient @xmath68 .
let @xmath16 denote the set of free homotopy classes of primitive closed paths in @xmath1 .
for @xmath69 , @xmath18 is the length of the shortest representative of @xmath19 .
the group @xmath70 is the stabilizer of @xmath19 under the action of @xmath57 .
the _ @xmath0-zeta function _ of @xmath1 is defined in @xcite as the infinite product @xmath71 the adjacency operator @xmath7 and laplace operator @xmath72 are @xmath57-equivariant operators on @xmath73 .
choosing lifts of vertices of @xmath68 yields a decomposition @xmath74 .
then from ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 0.3 ) , @xmath75 in this formula , @xmath76 is the @xmath0-euler characteristic of @xmath1 , which in our setting is simply equal to @xmath77 .
the determinant @xmath78 is defined via formal power series as @xmath79 and converges for small @xmath4 .
more precisely , if @xmath1 is @xmath5 regular then the radius of convergence of @xmath80 is greater than or equal to @xmath81 [ extension ] let @xmath1 be a @xmath5 regular graph
. then @xmath80 has a holomorphic extension to @xmath82 by it is enough to show that @xmath83 has a holomorphic extension on @xmath32 .
let @xmath84 .
here and in the rest of the paper @xmath85 is the principal branch of the logarithm , defined and analytic on @xmath86 $ ] .
fix @xmath87 .
then using proposition [ omega ] , there exists an open set @xmath88 $ ] on which @xmath89 is analytic . since @xmath7 is self - adjoint and @xmath90 , the spectrum @xmath91 $ ] . by the spectral theorem for self - adjoint operators we can write : @xmath92 now @xmath93 is well defined , and @xmath94 is a holomorphic function of @xmath41 on @xmath32 .
now for small @xmath41 , @xmath95 using the functional equation it is possible to extend the @xmath96-zeta function to the exterior of @xmath30 . defining the zeta function on @xmath30 itself presents some problems . in examples ,
the function on the interior of @xmath30 and the exterior of @xmath30 do not match continuously on @xmath30 .
however the absolute value of the resulting function is the fuglede - kadison determinant , and may extend continuously to @xmath30 .
in this section we prove that the zeta functions for a tower of finite graphs , suitably renormalized , converge to the @xmath0-zeta function for an infinite covering graph .
the argument uses an idea from @xcite .
[ thm : conv ] let @xmath1 be a @xmath5 regular graph .
suppose the group @xmath57 acts freely on @xmath1 , and that @xmath8 is a finite graph .
suppose @xmath97 is a tower of finite index normal subgroups and @xmath98 .
let @xmath99=n_i$ ] and @xmath100 .
then for @xmath101 , we have @xmath102 the convergence is uniform on compact subsets of @xmath32 . from the remark
we need to show that @xmath105 let @xmath106 .
let @xmath107 , where @xmath108 is the spectral decomposition of @xmath7 acting on @xmath109 we now set @xmath110 then from ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 2.3.1 ) , for all @xmath111 $ ] , @xmath112 we know @xmath113 by @xmath114 if @xmath115 is compact then @xmath116 is bounded uniformly for @xmath117 and @xmath55 in an open interval containing @xmath118.$ ] now integration by parts shows that indeed @xmath119 as @xmath120 .
let @xmath1 be the line , with vertices @xmath121 and edges connecting @xmath122 to @xmath123 .
the group @xmath124 acts on @xmath1 with quotient having one vertex and one edge .
let @xmath125 , so @xmath126 is an @xmath122-cycle .
as @xmath127 has only two primitive loops and @xmath1 has none , we have @xmath128 and @xmath129 .
the graphs are 2-regular , so @xmath32 is the ( open ) unit disk . for @xmath101 , @xmath130 notice that the functional equation gives @xmath131 outside of the unit disk .
let @xmath1 be the @xmath5 regular tree and @xmath132 finite .
since @xmath1 has no closed loops , the @xmath0-zeta function of @xmath1 is the constant function 1 .
so if @xmath126 is a tower of finite graphs covering @xmath68 , @xmath133 } = 1\ ] ] for @xmath101 .
this result is contained in @xcite for @xmath134 small .
k. hashimoto .
zeta functions of finite graphs and representations of @xmath140-adic groups . in _ automorphic forms and geometry of arithmetic varieties _ , volume 15 of _ adv .
studies in pure mathematics_. academic press , 1989 . | finite graph @xmath2 zeta function @xmath3 @xmath4 defined infinite product shown by ihara hashimoto bass @xcite polynomial rationality formula @xmath5 regular @xmath2 states @xmath6 @xmath7 adjacency operator @xmath2 @xcite @xmath0-zeta function defined noncompact graphs von neumann algebras rationality formula expresses relationship zeta function von neumann determinant laplace operator results paper focus especial case @xmath1 infinite graph covers finite graph @xmath8 @xmath0-zeta function @xmath9 defined @xcite small neighborhood zero first result extend @xmath0-zeta function interior @xmath10 second part consider tower finite graphs @xmath11 covered @xmath1 @xmath12 zeta functions @xmath11 @xmath13 roots converge to @xmath0-zeta function @xmath1 argument inspired by work lck @xcite first section recall definitions zeta functions finite infinite graphs main results theorem [ extension ] second section prove convergence theorem examples theorem [ deit ] generalizes work deitmar @xciterecall definition zeta function material for finite graphs graph @xmath2 @xmath14 @xmath15 denote vertices edges @xmath2 if each vertex same degree @xmath2 regular_ @xmath2 finite graph closed path primitive if not nontrivial power of another path fundamental group @xmath16 free homoptopy classes primitive closed paths zeta function is @xmath17 @xmath18 minimum length of paths in class @xmath19 @xmath7 adjacency operator graph @xmath2 acting on @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 degree of vertex @xmath24 @xmath25 ihara rationality formula @xmath3 polynomial @xmath26 zeta function satisfies functional equation @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 proposition known proof in page 59 ) zeros of zeta function for finite @xmath5 regular graph lie on set @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 interior of @xmath30 @xmath33 $ @xmath34 $ ] @xmath35 for @xmath36 real @xmath37 implies either @xmath38 or @xmath39 @xmath39 @xmath40 negative zero @xmath41 outside circle @xmath42 @xmath38 @xmath43 @xmath44 no root @xmath44 positive @xmath45 non - negative @xmath48 not zero @xmath49 @xmath44 positive on @xmath50 @xmath5 finite graph polynomial @xmath51 @xmath52 root @xmath32 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 varies eigenvalues adjacency operator @xmath56 analytic @xmath52 root @xmath51 @xmath57 discrete group von neumann algebra @xmath57 algebra @xmath58 @xmath57-equivariant operators @xmath59 to neumann trace @xmath60 defined @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63-equivariant operator @xmath64 @xmath65 independent decomposition @xmath66 trace extends @xmath57-equivariant operators @xmath58-modules @xmath67 infinite graph group @xmath57 acts on @xmath1 finite quotient @xmath68 @xmath16 free homotopy classes primitive closed paths @xmath1 @xmath69 @xmath18 length shortest representative @xmath19group @xmath70 stabilizer @xmath19 action @xmath57 @xmath0-zeta function @xmath1 defined infinite product @xmath71 adjacency operator @xmath7 laplace operator @xmath72 @xmath57-equivariant operators @xmath73 lifts vertices @xmath68 yields decomposition @xmath74 theorem @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath0-euler characteristic @xmath1 equal to @xmath77 determinant @xmath78 defined @xmath79 converges @xmath4 @xmath1 @xmath5 regular radius convergence @xmath80 greater equal @xmath81 @xmath1 @xmath5 regular graph @xmath80 holomorphic extension to @xmath82 @xmath83 holomorphic extension @xmath32 @xmath84 @xmath85 principal branch logarithm defined analytic on @xmath86 @xmath87 open set @xmath88 @xmath89 analytic @xmath7 self - adjoint @xmath90 spectrum @xmath91 spectral theorem self - adjoint operators @xmath92 @xmath93 defined @xmath94 holomorphic function @xmath41 on @xmath32@xmath41 @xmath95 functional extend @xmath96-zeta function exterior @xmath30 defining zeta function on @xmath30 presents problems function interior exterior match absolute value function fuglede - kadison determinant extend to @xmath30 prove zeta functions finite graphs converge to @xmath0-zeta function infinite covering graph argument idea from @xcite @xmath1 @xmath5 regular graph group @xmath57 acts on @xmath1 @xmath8 finite graph @xmath97 tower finite index normal subgroups @xmath98 @xmath99=n_i$ @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 convergence uniform on compact subsets @xmath32 show @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 spectral decomposition @xmath7 on @xmath109 set @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath113 @xmath114 @xmath115 compact @xmath116 bounded uniformly for @xmath117 @xmath55 open interval @xmath118 integration parts shows @xmath119 as @xmath120 @xmath1 be line vertices @xmath121 edges connecting @xmath122 to @xmath123@xmath124 acts @xmath1 vertex edge @xmath125 @xmath126 @xmath122-cycle @xmath127 two primitive loops @xmath1 none @xmath128 @xmath129 graphs 2-regular @xmath32 open unit disk @xmath101 @xmath130 functional equation @xmath131 outside unit disk @xmath1 @xmath5 regular tree @xmath132 finite @xmath1 no closed loops @xmath0-zeta function constant 1 @xmath126 tower finite graphs @xmath68 @xmath133 1 @xmath101 result @xmath134 hashimoto zeta functions finite graphs @xmath140-adic groups automorphic forms geometry arithmetic varieties volume 15 mathematics academic press 1989 | 0.352045 | 2,509 | 1,395 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,929 | for high energy linearly polarized photon
proton scattering we have calculated the azimuthal and polar angle distributions in inclusive on recoil proton experimental setup .
we have taken into account the production of lepton and pseudoscalar meson charged pairs .
the typical values of cross sections are of order of hundreds of picobarn .
the size of polarization effects are of order of several percents .
the results are generalized for the case of electroproduction processes on the proton at rest and for high energy proton production process on resting proton .
we have considered below the experimental setup of processes of charged pair @xmath0 production ( pseudoscalars , leptons ) by high energy photon scattering on proton at rest frame with following detection of recoil proton @xmath1 two different mechanisms of pair production must be considered .
one corresponds to the pair creation by two photons bethe heitler ( bh ) .
another one is the bremsstrahlung ( b ) , which corresponds to the case when pair is created by single virtual photon ( we have implied the lowest in qed coupling constant @xmath2 contributions ) .
the contribution of b type is suppressed compared with one of bh type by factor @xmath3 . as for interference of b and bh
amplitudes it is exactly zero in the inclusive on recoil proton setup we have considered below .
the accuracy of formulae given below are determined by the terms we have omitted systematically compared with terms of order of unity @xmath4 in the peripheric kinematical region @xmath5 effectively works the infinite momentum frame ( imf ) or sudakov @xcite parametrization of transferred momentum and the 4momenta of final particles @xmath6 from the on mass shell condition of recoil proton @xmath7 , one infers @xmath8 we use here the smallness of @xmath9 compared with @xmath10 .
here @xmath11 invariant mass square of pair , assumed to be of order @xmath12 .
for the case of large @xmath13 one can put considered @xmath14 to @xmath15 .
the ratio of transversal and longitudinal component of momentum of recoil proton ( laboratory frame implied ) is @xmath16 this relation , first mentioned in paper of benaksas and morrison @xcite , can be written in different form in terms of the value for 3vector of momentum of recoil proton @xmath17 @xmath18 with @xmath19 is the angle between the directions of initial photon and recoil proton in laboratory frame ( see more exact formula in appendix a )
. matrix element of charged lepton or pion pair production in lowest order of qed perturbation theory ( keeping in mind bh mechanism ) has the form @xmath20 with proton current defined as @xmath21}{4m}f_2(q^2)]u(p),\ ] ] and @xmath22 proton form factors .
compton lepton tensor has the form @xmath23v(q_+),\ ] ] similarly compton pion tensor @xmath24 these tensors obey the gauge invariance requirements @xmath25 .
using gribov prescription for green function of virtual photon in feynman gauge and omitting small contributions in frames of declared accuracy @xmath26\approx \frac{2}{s}\tilde{p}^\mu k^\nu,\ ] ] one can put the matrix element , extracting explicitly the factor @xmath27 in form @xmath28 both light cone projections of proton current and compton tensors are finite in large @xmath27 limit .
summing on proton spin states one has for proton current projection square @xmath29.\ ] ] expressing the phase volume of the final particles in terms of sudakov variables @xcite @xmath30 where we introduce the unit factor @xmath31 and besides we have used @xmath32 further operations , summing over spin states of leptons of square of matrix element , performing the integration over pair energy fractions @xmath33 , @xmath34 , ( @xmath35 ) and its transversal momentum @xmath36 , ( conservation low provides @xmath37 ) , and using the photon polarization matrix @xmath38_{ij}$ ] , ( @xmath39 stokes parameters , @xmath40 unite matrix , @xmath41 pauli matrices ) is straightforward but tedious . the result can be written in the form @xmath42 where @xmath43 .
the azimuthal angle @xmath44 is the angle between two transversal to photon direction vectors : photon linear polarization @xmath45 and @xmath46 ; @xmath47 is angle between @xmath45 and axes @xmath48 ; @xmath49 is degree of photon linear polarization and @xmath50 @xmath51 is azimuthal asymmetry @xmath52 in the equations ( [ eq11 ] , [ eq12 ] ) quantities @xmath53 , @xmath54 are @xmath55 it is interesting to consider distribution @xmath56 of recoil proton on the value @xmath57
. calculations of this distribution were carried out on the base of formula , which is obtained from ( 10 , 11 ) after substitution @xmath58 ( see ( [ eq6 ] ) ) @xmath59 at the fig .
[ fig1 ] the distributions @xmath60 for each of considered processes are depicted .
for numerical calculation we used the dipole approximation @xcite @xmath61}{0.71 ^ 2}\big)^2 } , \\
f_e = f_1-f_2\frac{q^2}{4m^2},\quad f_m = f_1+f_2.\end{gathered}\ ] ] with @xmath62 - anomalous magnetic moment of proton .
function @xmath63 in dipole approximation has the form @xmath64}{(0,71)^2}+1)^4}.\ ] ] at the fig .
[ fig2 ] the asymmetries @xmath51 as function of momentum @xmath57 for each of considered processes are shown . at the fig .
[ fig3 ] mentioned asymmetries as function of the scattering angle @xmath19 are shown .
the ratio @xmath65 can be considered as averaged over all processes asymmetry which estimate the total influence of initial photon linear polarization on the value of recoil proton azimuthal asymmetry .
this value is also presented at the fig .
[ fig3 ] . in units of pbn mev@xmath66 for the cases of @xmath67 pair , @xmath68 pair and @xmath69 pair production as function of @xmath57 . ] for the cases of @xmath67 pair , @xmath68 pair and @xmath69 pair production as function of @xmath57 . ] | from the figures ( [ fig2 ] , [ fig3 ] ) one can see that in the inclusive setup of the process of charged pairs production by interaction of linearly polarized high energy photon with proton distribution of recoil proton has rather essential azimuthal asymmetry , from 0.02 at the relatively small polar angles @xmath19 up to @xmath70 at @xmath71 . for the cases of @xmath67 pair , @xmath68 pair and @xmath69 pair production and also @xmath72 as function of scattering angle @xmath19 . ] in exclusive setup for processes with more heavy particles than e@xmath73e@xmath74 , mentioned asymmetry increases .
particularly interesting is the process of @xmath69 pair photoproduction .
one can see that azimuthal asymmetry of recoil proton in this process reaches the value @xmath75 at the region of small transferred momentum or for polar angles close to the value @xmath76 .
this features of @xmath69 pair photoproduction process allows one to hope that this process can be considered as the polarimetric process .
we shall discuss this process from this point of view in the more details in the next work .
the inclusive on recoil proton distribution is the sum on all possible channels including fermion ( @xmath67 , @xmath68 , @xmath77 ) and pseudoscalar meson ( @xmath69 , @xmath78 ) pairs .
production of heavy resonances such as @xmath79 meson can be excluded using experimental cuts .
the suggested method of measuring the recoil distributions can provide the independent way to control the luminosity and polarization properties of photon beam . in paper @xcite the photoproduction of electron
positron pair on electron was considered in lowest order of pt .
the radiative corrections to cross section were considered in paper @xcite and in all orders of pt on parameter @xmath80 in paper @xcite both for unpolarized case .
it turns that for @xmath81 our results can be applied for photoproduction on nuclei with relevant modification of @xmath63 .
the radiative corrections can change the values @xmath82 , @xmath83 in frames of 12@xmath84 .
the proton recoil momentum measurements can as well be arranged in @xmath85 and @xmath86 experiments with initial proton at rest .
using the weizscker
williams approximation the corresponding cross sections can be written as @xmath87\dd\sigma^{\gamma { \mathrm { p}}\to a\bar{a}{\mathrm { p'}}}\end{gathered}\ ] ] for electron proton collisions and @xmath88 \dd\sigma^{\gamma { \mathrm { p}}\to a\bar{a}{\mathrm { p'}}},\end{gathered}\ ] ] for proton proton collisions with @xmath89 , @xmath90 is the energy of initial electron or proton and @xmath91 are given above . inferring these formulae we supposed that the transversal momentum of projectile ( e or p ) does not exceed @xmath92 .
the polarization vector of virtual photon interacting with proton at rest is directed along this projectile transverse momentum .
one of us ( eak ) is grateful to institute of physics , sas .
we are grateful to participants of seminar of theoretical physics sas .
one of us ( y.p ) is grateful to grant stsu-3239 .
the work was partly supported also by slovak grant agency for sciences vega , grant no . 2/4099/26 .
more exact formula which takes into account power corrections for recoil proton momentum has a form @xcite @xmath93 under condition @xmath94 upper branch of ( [ yupcom1 ] ) passes to @xmath95 with @xmath96 invariant mass squared of pair produced
. 99 d. benaksas and r. j. morrison , phys . rev .
* 160 * ( 1967 ) 1245 .
v. n. baier , e. a. kuraev , v. s. fadin and v. a. khoze , phys .
* 78 * , 293 ( 1981 ) .
a. i. akhiezer , m. p. rekalo , _ electrodynamics of hadrons _
( in russian ) , naukova dumka , kiev , 1977 . e. a. vinokurov and e. a. kuraev , zh . eksp
. teor .
fiz . * 63 * , 1142 ( 1972 ) .
e. a. vinokurov , e. a. kuraev and n. p. merenkov , zh . eksp .
* 66 * , 1916 ( 1974 ) .
d. ivanov and k. melnikov , phys .
d * 57 * , 4025 ( 1998 ) v. f. boldyshev , e. a. vinokurov , n. p. merenkov and yu .
p. peresunko , phys .
part . nucl . * 25 * , 292 ( 1994 ) . | figures inclusive setup charged pairs production linearly polarized high energy photon proton distribution recoil proton essential azimuthal asymmetry from 0.02 small polar angles @xmath19 to @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 pair @xmath72 function scattering angle @xmath19 setup processes heavy particles than@xmath73e@xmath74 asymmetry increases @xmath69 pair photoproduction azimuthal asymmetry recoil proton reaches @xmath75 small transferred momentum polar angles close @xmath76 @xmath69 pair polarimetric process discuss next work inclusive recoil proton distribution sum on all channels including fermion @xmath67 @xmath77 pseudoscalar meson @xmath69 pairs production heavy resonances @xmath79 meson excluded using experimental cuts suggested measuring recoil distributions control luminosity polarization properties photon beam paper @xcite photoproduction of electron positron pair on electron considered lowest order of pt radiative corrections to cross section considered all orders pt on parameter @xmath80 unpolarized case@xmath81 results applied photoproduction nuclei modification @xmath63 radiative corrections change values @xmath82 @xmath83 frames 12@xmath84 proton recoil momentum measurements arranged in @xmath85 @xmath86 experiments initial proton rest weizscker williams approximation cross sections written as @xmath87 for electron proton collisions @xmath88 for proton collisions @xmath89 @xmath90 energy of initial electron proton @xmath91 above transversal momentum of projectile exceed @xmath92 polarization vector of virtual photon interacting with proton at rest directed along projectile transverse momentum grateful to institute of physics participants seminar theoretical physics grant stsu-3239 work supported by slovak grant agency sciences vega grant 2/4099/26 exact formula power corrections for recoil proton momentum @xmath93 condition @xmath94 upper branch passes to @xmath95 with @xmath96 invariant mass squared pair d. benaksas r. j. morrison phys160 * 1967 ) 1245 baier kuraev fadin khoze phys . 78 * 293 ( 1981 ). akhiezer. rekalo electrodynamics hadrons russian naukova dumka kiev 1977 vinokurov kuraev eksp teor fiz . 63 * 1142 ( 1972 ) vinokurov kuraev merenkov eksp. 66 * 1916 ( 1974 ) ivanov melnikov . 57 * 4025 ( 1998 ). boldyshev vinokurov merenkov peresunko phys . part. nucl. 25 * 292 ( 1994 ) | 0.181539 | 1,168 | 574 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,939 | we have performed a first fully 3-d grmhd simulation with schwarzschild black hole with a free falling corona .
the initial simulation results show that a jet is created as in previous axisymmetric simulations
. however , the time to generate the jet is longer than in the 2-d simulations .
we expect that due to the additional azimuthal dimension the dynamics of jet formation can be modified .
# 1_#1 _ # 1_#1 _ = # 1 1.25 in .125 in .25 in | relativistic jets have been observed in active galactic nuclei ( agns ) and microquasars in our galaxy , and it is believed that they originate from the regions near accreting black holes . to investigate the dynamics of accretion disks and the associated jet formation , we use our newly developed full 3-d grmhd code .
recently , koide , shibata , & kudoh ( 1999 ) have investigated the dynamics of an accretion disk initially threaded by a uniform poloidal magnetic field in a non - rotating corona ( either in a state of steady fall or in hydrostatic equilibrium ) around a non - rotating black hole .
the numerical results show that the disk loses angular momentum by magnetic braking , then falls into the black hole . the infalling motion of the disk , which is faster than in the non - relativistic case because of the general - relativistic effect below @xmath0 ( @xmath1 is the schwarzschild radius ) , is strongly decelerated at the shock formed by the centrifugal force around @xmath2 by the rotation of the disk .
plasmas near the shock are accelerated by the @xmath3 force , which forms bipolar relativistic jets . inside this _ magnetically driven jet _ , the gradient of gas pressure also generates a jet over the shock region ( _ gas - pressure - driven jet _ ) .
this _ two - layered jet structure _ is formed both in a hydrostatic corona and in a steady - state falling corona .
koide et al .
( 2000 ) have also developed a new grmhd code in kerr geometry and have found that , with a rapidly rotating ( @xmath4 ) black - hole magnetosphere , the maximum velocity of the jet is 0.9 c and its terminal velocity 0.85 c. all of the previous 2-d grmhd simulations described here were made assuming axisymmetry with respect to the @xmath5-axis and mirror symmetry with respect to the plane @xmath6 ; the axisymmetric assumption suppressed the azimuthal instabilities .
our basic equations are those of maxwell for the fields and a set of general - relativistic equations representing the plasma , namely the equations of conservation of mass , momentum , and energy for a single - component conducting fluid ( weinberg 1972 ; thorne et al .
in making the simulations , we use these equations with the 3 + 1 formalism ( for details , see koide , shibata , & kudoh 1999 ) .
in order to investigate how accretion disks near black holes evolve under the influence of accretion instabilities such as the magnetorotational instability , the use of a fully 3-d grmhd is essential . in the assumed initial state , the simulation region
is divided into two parts : a background corona around a black hole , and an accretion disk ( fig .
1a and 1b ) .
the coronal plasma is set in a state of transonic free - fall flow , as in the case of the transonic flows with @xmath7 and @xmath8 ; here the sonic point is located at @xmath9 .
the keplerian disk in the corona is set in the following way .
the disk region is located at @xmath10^{1/2}$ ] .
( note that this equation reduces to the newtonian keplerian velocity @xmath11 in the non - relativistic limit @xmath12 ) .
the pressure of both the corona and the disk are assumed equal to that of the transonic solution .
the initial conditions for the entire plasma around the black hole are : @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 where we set @xmath16 ; the smoothing length is @xmath17 .
in addition , there is a magnetic field crossing the accretion disk perpendicularly .
we set it to the wald solution ( wald 1974 ) , which represents the uniform magnetic field around a kerr black hole : @xmath18 , @xmath19 ( where @xmath20 is the lapse function , @xmath21 ) . at the inner edge of the accretion disk ,
the proper alfvn velocity is @xmath22 in a typical case with @xmath23 , where the alfvn velocity in the fiducial observer @xmath24/c^2}}.\ ] ] the plasma beta of the corona at @xmath25 is @xmath26 .
the simulation is performed in the region @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 with @xmath30 meshes .
the effective linear mesh widths at @xmath31 and at @xmath32 are @xmath33 and @xmath34 , respectively , while the angular spacings along the polar and azimuthal directions are @xmath35 rad .
a radiative boundary condition is imposed at @xmath36 and at @xmath37 : @xmath38 where the superscripts @xmath39 and @xmath40 denote the time steps and the subscripts 0 and 1 refer to the boundary and to its neighbor meshes , respectively .
the computations were made on an origin 2000 computer with 0.898 gb internal memory , and they used about 47 hours of cpu time for 10000 time steps with @xmath30 meshes .
figure 1 shows the evolution of 3-d simulation performed in the region @xmath41 , @xmath42 , and @xmath43 with @xmath30 meshes .
the parameters used in this simulation are the same as those of the axisymmetric simulations shown in fig .
6 of koide , shibata , & kudoh ( 1999 ) . in this figure
, the colored shading shows the proper mass density ( ( a ) and ( c ) ) and the pressure ( ( b ) and ( d ) ) on logarithmic scales ; the vector plots show the magnetic field ( ( a ) and ( c ) ) and flow velocity ( ( b ) and ( d ) ) .
the black circle represents the black hole .
figures 1a and 1b present the initial conditions , which are the same as in the 2-d simulations ( koide , shibata , & kudoh 1999 ) . at @xmath44 comparing with fig .
6c ( @xmath45 ) in koide et al .
( 1999 ) the jet is less generated . at @xmath46 the jet is generated as 2-d simulation at the earlier time ( @xmath45 ) . at @xmath47 , the jet is clearly created around @xmath48 , which is shown by the enhanced density ( fig .
1c ) and pressure ( fig .
1d ) . as in the 2-d simulations
the jet is generated in a hollowed cylindrical form .
the magnetic field is twisted by the accretion disk and pinched , which increases the magnetic field pressure and generates the jet near the black hole .
the delay of jet formation seems to be due to reduction of shock formation at @xmath2 caused by the additional freedom in the azimuthal direction .
further investigation will be reported elsewhere .
this simulation result is initial and we will perform more simulations and investigate effects of the third dimension .
further results will be reported elsewhere .
is partially supported by nsf atm 9730230 , atm-9870072 , atm-0100997 , and int-9981508 .
the simulations have been performed on origin 2000 at ncsa which is supported by nsf .
koide , s. , shibata , k. , & kudoh , t. 1999 , , 522 , 727 koide , s. , meier , d. l. , shibata , k. , & kudoh , t. 2000 , apj , 536 , 668 thorne , k. s. , price , r. h. , & macdonald , d. a. 1986 , black holes : the membrane paradigm ( new haven : yale univ . press ) wald , r. m. 1974 , , 10 , 1680 weinberg , s. 1972 , gravitation and cosmology ( new york : wiley ) | relativistic jets observed in active galactic nuclei microquasars originate from near accreting black holes investigate dynamics of accretion disks jet formation use full 3-d grmhd code koide shibata kudoh 1999 investigated dynamics accretion disk threaded by poloidal magnetic field in non - rotating corona around black hole results show disk loses momentum by magnetic braking falls into black hole infalling motion faster than - relativistic effect below @xmath0 decelerated at shock by centrifugal force around @xmath2 rotation disk plasmas near shock accelerated by @xmath3 force forms bipolar relativistic jets gradient gas pressure generates jet over shock region two - layered jet structure formed in hydrostatic steady - falling corona koide et al . 2000 developed new grmhd code in kerr geometry found with rapidly rotating @xmath4 black - hole magnetosphere maximum velocity jet 0.9 c terminal velocity 0.85 cprevious 2-d grmhd simulations axisymmetry @xmath5-axis mirror symmetry plane @xmath6 axisymmetric assumption suppressed azimuthal instabilities basic equations are maxwell fields general - relativistic equations plasma conservation of mass momentum energy for single - component conducting fluid weinberg 1972 thorne et al use equations with 3 + 1 formalism koide shibata kudoh 1999 investigate accretion disks near black holes accretion instabilities 3-d grmhd essential initial state simulation region divided into background corona around black hole accretion disk ( fig . 1a 1b ) coronal plasma transonic free - fall flow sonic point at @xmath9 keplerian disk in corona disk region at @xmath10^{1/2}$ equation reduces to newtonian keplerian velocity @xmath11 non - relativistic limit @xmath12 pressure of corona disk equal to transonic solution initial conditions for plasma around black hole are @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 smoothing length is @xmath17 magnetic field crossing accretion disk perpendicularlyset wald solution 1974 represents uniform magnetic field around kerr black hole @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 lapse function @xmath21 inner edge accretion disk proper alfvn velocity @xmath22 @xmath23 alfvn velocity observer @xmath24/c plasma beta corona @xmath25 @xmath26 simulation region @xmath27 @xmath28 with @xmath30 meshes effective linear mesh widths @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 angular spacings polar azimuthal directions @xmath35 rad radiative boundary condition at @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 superscripts @xmath39 @xmath40 denote time steps subscripts 0 1 refer boundary neighbor meshes computations origin 2000 computer 0.898 gb internal memory used 47 hours cpu time for 10000 time steps @xmath30 meshes figure 1 shows evolution 3-d simulation region @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 with @xmath30 meshes parameters same as axisymmetric simulations fig . 6 koide shibata kudoh 1999 colored shading shows mass density pressure logarithmic scales vector plots show magnetic field flow velocityblack circle represents black hole figures 1a 1b initial conditions same 2-d simulations ( koide shibata kudoh 1999 ) at @xmath44 fig. 6c jet less generated @xmath46 jet generated as 2-d earlier time @xmath45 @xmath47 jet created around @xmath48 enhanced density fig 1c pressure 1d ) jet generated hollowed cylindrical form magnetic field twisted accretion disk increases pressure generates jet near black hole delay jet formation due to reduction shock formation at @xmath2 additional freedom azimuthal direction further investigation reported simulation result initial perform more simulations investigate effects third dimension further results reported partially supported by nsf atm 9730230 -9870072 atm-0100997 int-9981508 simulations performed on origin 2000 at ncsa supported by nsf koide shibata kudoh 1999 522 , 727 2000 536 , 668 thorne price macdonald 1986 black holes : membrane paradigm ( new haven yale univ . press ) wald , r. m1680 weinberg 1972 gravitation cosmology new york wiley | 0.308113 | 1,779 | 942 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,942 | we present a resonant switch ( rs ) model of twin peak high - frequency quasi - periodic oscillations ( hf qpos ) , assuming switch of twin oscillations at a resonant point , where frequencies of the upper and lower oscillations @xmath0 and @xmath1 become to be commensurable and the twin oscillations change from one pair of the oscillating modes ( corresponding to a specific model of hf qpos ) to some other pair due to non - linear resonant phenomena .
the rs model enables to determine range of allowed values of spin @xmath2 and mass @xmath3 of the neutron star located at the atoll source 4u 1636@xmath453 where two resonant points are observed at frequency ratios @xmath5 , 5:4 . | in the case of lmxbs containing neutron or quark stars we propose a new model of twin peak hf qpos assuming switching of the twin oscillatory modes creating sequences of the lower and upper hf qpos at a resonant point .
according to such a resonant switch ( rs ) model non - linear resonant phenomena will cause excitation of a new oscillatory mode ( or two new oscillatory modes ) and vanishing of one of the previously acting modes ( or both the previous modes ) , i.e. , switching from one pair of the oscillatory modes to other pair of them that will be acting up to the following resonant point @xcite .
we assume two resonant points at the disc radii @xmath6 and @xmath7 , with observed frequencies @xmath8 , @xmath9 and @xmath10 , @xmath11 , being in commensurable ratios @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
these resonant frequencies are determined by the energy switch effect ( ( * ? ? ?
* trk 2009 ) ) ; observations put the restrictions @xmath14 and @xmath15 . in the region covering the resonant point at @xmath6
the twin oscillatory modes with the upper ( lower ) frequency are determined by the function @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) . near the inner resonant point at @xmath7 different oscillatory modes given by the frequency functions @xmath18 and
@xmath19 occur ( @xmath20 is the dimensionless radius ) .
we assume all the frequency functions to be determined by combinations of the orbital and epicyclic frequencies of the geodesic motion in the kerr backgrounds .
such a simplification is correct with high precision for neutron ( quark ) stars with large masses , close to the maximum mass allowed for a given equation of state .
the frequency functions have to meet the observationally given resonant frequencies . in the framework of the simple rs model , when two resonant points and two pairs of the frequency functions are assumed , this requirement enables determination of the neutron ( quark ) star parameters .
the `` shooting '' of the frequency functions to the resonant points can be realized efficiently in two steps .
independence of the frequency ratio on the mass parameter @xmath3 implies the conditions @xmath21 giving relations for the spin @xmath2 in terms of the dimensionless radius @xmath22 and the resonant frequency ratio @xmath23 .
they can be expressed in the form @xmath24 and @xmath25 , or in an inverse form @xmath26 and @xmath27 . at the resonant radii
the conditions @xmath28 are satisfied along the functions @xmath29 and @xmath30 which are obtained by using the functions @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
the parameters of the neutron ( quark ) star are then given by the condition @xmath31 the condition ( [ rs ] ) determines @xmath3 and @xmath2 precisely , if the resonant frequencies are determined precisely .
if an error occurs in determination of the resonant frequencies , as naturally expected , our method gives related intervals of acceptable values of mass and spin parameter of the neutron ( quark ) star .
we test the rs model in the case of the atoll 4u 1636@xmath453 source that seems to be the best possibility due to the character of the observational data demonstrating clearly existence of two `` resonant points '' where the energy switch effect occurs . using the results of @xcite ,
the resonant frequencies determined by the energy switch effect are given in the outer resonant point with frequency ratio @xmath32 by the frequency intervals @xmath33 and at the inner resonant point with frequency ratio @xmath34 there is @xmath35 we consider the standard specific models of the twin oscillations based on the orbital and epicyclic geodetical frequencies and in the framework of the rs model we determine range of allowed values of spin @xmath2 and mass @xmath3 of the neutron star located at the atoll source 4u 1636@xmath453 .
the predicted ranges of the neutron star parameters are strongly dependent on the twin modes applied in the rs model .
the mass and spin estimates of the rs model have to be confronted with restrictions on the neutron star mass and spin implied by the theoretical models of neutron ( quark ) stars and the observed rotational frequency of the neutron star at 4u 1636@xmath453 .
we consider as acceptable upper values @xmath36 , @xmath37 and demonstrate that for some of the oscillatory modes used in the rs model the predicted parameters of the neutron star are unacceptable , being too high . among acceptable rs models the most promising are those combining the relativistic precession ( where @xmath38 , @xmath39 ) and the total precession ( where @xmath40 , @xmath41 ) frequency relations or their modifications . the switch of the oscillating modes is not given by the resonant phenomena necessarily .
the cause could be , e.g. , given by the magnetic field , then the alfvn wave model ( @xcite ) can be relevant
. + + * acknowledgements . *
we thank grant gar 202/09/0772 and the project cz.1.07/2.3.00/20.0071 `` synergy '' supporting international collaboration of the institute of physics at su opava . | lmxbs neutron quark stars propose new model twin peak hf qpos switching twin oscillatory modes creating lower upper hf qpos resonant point resonant switch model non - linear resonant phenomena cause excitation new oscillatory mode vanishing previously switching resonant point assume two resonant points disc radii @xmath6 @xmath7 observed frequencies @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 ratios @xmath12 @xmath13 frequencies determined energy switch effect trk 2009 observations restrictions @xmath14 @xmath15 region resonant point @xmath6 twin oscillatory modes upper lower frequency determined by function @xmath16 @xmath17 inner resonant point @xmath7 different oscillatory modes frequency functions @xmath18 @xmath19 occur @xmath20 radius assume frequency functions determined by orbital epicyclic frequencies geodesic motion kerr backgrounds simplification correct for neutron quark ) stars large masses maximum mass equation state frequency functions meet observationally given resonant frequenciessimple rs model two resonant points frequency functions assumed enables determination neutron quark ) star parameters shooting frequency functions to resonant points in two steps independence frequency ratio on mass parameter @xmath3 implies conditions @xmath21 for spin @xmath2 dimensionless radius @xmath22 resonant frequency ratio @xmath23 expressed @xmath24 @xmath25 or @xmath26 @xmath27 resonant radii conditions @xmath28 satisfied functions @xmath29 @xmath30 obtained @xmath24 @xmath25 parameters neutron star given by condition @xmath31 rs determines @xmath3 @xmath2 precisely if resonant frequencies determined precisely error frequencies method gives related intervals acceptable values mass spin parameter neutron star test rs model atoll 4u 1636@xmath453 source best possibility observational data two resonant points energy switch effect occursresults @xcite resonant frequencies energy switch effect outer resonant point frequency @xmath32 frequency intervals @xmath33 inner resonant point @xmath34 @xmath35 standard models twin oscillations orbital epicyclic geodetical frequencies rs model determine allowed values spin @xmath2 mass @xmath3 neutron star atoll source 4u 1636@xmath453 predicted neutron star parameters dependent on twin modes rs model mass spin estimates with restrictions neutron star mass spin theoretical models observed rotational frequency 4u 1636@xmath453 acceptable upper values @xmath36 @xmath37 some oscillatory modes rs model predicted parameters neutron star unacceptable too high acceptable rs models promising combining relativistic precession @xmath38 @xmath39 total precession ) frequency relations switch oscillating modes not given by resonant phenomena magnetic field alfvn wave model @xcite ) relevant thank grant gar 202/09/0772 project cz.1.07/2.3.00/20.0071 synergy supporting international collaboration institute of physics su opava | 0.1837 | 1,233 | 614 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,943 | about 10tev @xmath0-ray emission within 10pc region from the galactic center had been reported by 4 independent groups . considering that this tev @xmath0-ray emission is produced via a hadronic model , and the relativistic protons came from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes , we investigate the spectral nature of the injected relativistic protons required by the hadronic model .
the calculation was carried on the tidal disruption of the different types of stars and the different propagation mechanisms of protons in the interstellar medium .
compared with the observation data from hess , we find for the best fitting that the power - law index of the spectrum of the injected protons is about -1.9 , when a red giant star is tidally disrupted , and the effective confinement of protons diffusion mechanism is adopted . | the central region of milky way is a potential site for the production of effective particle acceleration and copious @xmath0-ray emission .
tev @xmath0-ray emission from the galactic center(gc ) had been reported by 4 independent groups in recent years : cangaroo ( @xcite ) , whipple ( @xcite ) , hess(@xcite ) , and magic ( @xcite ) .
one possibility for this tev @xmath0-ray emission source is in the whole diffuse 10 pc region , which is proposed to be related to the massive black hole sgr a@xmath1 harbored in our galactic center ( @xcite ) .
there are several radiation mechanisms for the production of tev @xmath0-ray emission .
one of these mechanisms proposed that the tev @xmath0-rays can be produced indirectly through the processes of @xmath2@xmath3-decay when relativistic protons are injected into and interact with the interstellar medium ( ism ) , called hadronic model ( @xcite ) .
if this is the case , by assuming that the initial injected protons spectrum follows a power - law plus a high energy cut - off , we can predict the spectrum of the injected relativistic protons by comparing the spectral energy distribution ( sed ) of the tev @xmath0-ray emission produced by hadronic model with observation data from hess .
to calculate the spectrum of the injected relativistic protons , we consider that the tev @xmath0-ray detected by hess is produced through the hadronic model , and the injection of the relativistic protons required by the hadronic model came from the jet of the black hole sgr a@xmath1 when it captures and tidally disrupts a star(@xcite ) . the tidal disruption of stars by massive black hole sgr a@xmath1 refers to main sequence ( ms ) stars and red giants .
for these two cases , the total energy carried by the jet is exactly the same as 2.7@xmath410@xmath5erg , which is believed to be enough for the production of the injected relativistic protons required by the hadronic model .
the definite difference resulting from the two cases are the diffusion timescale of the injected protons : 800 yr for the case of mss and 2.11@xmath410@xmath6yr for the red giants , respectively ( @xcite ) .
three kinds of diffusion mechanisms are involved for the propagation of the relativistic protons when they are injected into and interact with the ism : ( 1 ) the effective confinement of protons ( ecp ) , ( 2 ) the kolmogorov - type turbulence ( ktt ) , ( 3 ) the bohm diffusion ( bd ) .
for these three mechanisms , the diffusion coefficient depends on the proton energy , given by the formula of @xmath7=10@xmath8(@xmath9/1@xmath10)@xmath11@xmath12 @xmath13 .
the case of ecp corresponds to @xmath14=0.5 and@xmath12=10@xmath15 , ktt corresponds to @xmath14=0.3 and@xmath12=0.15 , and bd corresponds to @xmath14=1.0 and@xmath12=10@xmath16 . giving the initial injected relativistic protons spectrum follows a power - law plus a high energy cut - off , at a given time of @xmath17 and the source distance of @xmath18 , the sed of the tev @xmath0-ray emission produced through the model discussed above
can be calculated through @xmath19=@xmath20@xmath21@xmath22/@xmath23 , where @xmath9@xmath24 is the energy of the emitted @xmath0-ray photons , @xmath21 is the total volume of the ism , @xmath25@xmath24 is the emissivity of @xmath0-ray photons , and @xmath23=4@xmath2(@xmath26@xmath27)@xmath28 , where @xmath26@xmath27 is the distance from the observation to the source , and we adopt @xmath26@xmath27=8@xmath29 hereafter .
we address the sed of the emitted @xmath0-rays in the following cases : ( 1 ) the different power - law index @xmath30 of injected protons with values of 1.7 , 1.8 , 1.9 , 2.0 , 2.1 , 2.2 ; ( 2)the mss and red giants are tidally disrupted by massive black hole sgr @xmath31 ; ( 3)three diffusion mechanisms for the cases of ecp , ktt , and bd . by comparing the theoretical spectrum with the observation data from hess within the central 10pc of our galaxy , we find that the theoretical energy distribution can fit best with the observation data when the type of star disrupted by black hole is a red giant and the diffusion mechanism of protons is the effective confinement of protons ( ecp ) .
in such a case , we derived that the power - law index of the injected relativistic protons is -1.9 .
we have investigated the spectrum of the injected relativistic protons required by the hadronic model to produce the 10 tev @xmath0-ray emission detected by hess in the center of our galaxy . comparing with the observations , we find that the power - law index of the initial spectrum of the injected protons should be -1.9 .
this result is based on that the tidal disruption of a red giant by the black hole sgr @xmath31 is considered and the propagation of protons in the target gas is the ecp scenario . | central region milky way potential site for production particle acceleration @xmath0-ray emission tev @xmath0-ray emission from galactic center reported by 4 groups cangaroo whipple hess magic possibility for tev-ray emission source in diffuse 10 pc region related to massive black hole sgr a@xmath1 in galactic center several radiation mechanisms for production tev @xmath0-ray emission tev-rays produced indirectly through processes @xmath2@xmath3-decay relativistic protons injected into interact interstellar medium hadronic model initial injected protons spectrum follows power - law high energy cut - off predict spectrum protons by comparing spectral energy distribution-ray emission hadronic model with observation data from hess spectrum tev @xmath0-ray detected by hess produced through hadronic model injection protons from jet black hole sgr a@xmath1 tidally disrupts star tidal disruption of stars by black hole sgr a@xmath1 refers to main sequence stars red giantstwo cases total energy jet same as 2.7@xmath410@xmath5erg enough for production injected relativistic protons hadronic model difference diffusion timescale protons : 800 yr for mss and 2.11@xmath410@xmath6yr for red giants three diffusion mechanisms for propagation relativistic protons effective confinement of protons ecp kolmogorov - type turbulence ktt bohm diffusion bd diffusion coefficient depends on proton energy formula of @xmath7=10@xmath8(@xmath9/1@xmath10)@xmath11@xmath12 @xmath13 ecp to @xmath14=0.5 and@xmath12=10@xmath15 ktt @xmath14=0.3.15 bd @xmath14=1.0 and=10@xmath16 initial injected relativistic protons spectrum follows power - law high energy cut - off time @xmath17 source distance @xmath18 sed @xmath0-ray emission calculated @xmath19=@xmath20 @xmath9 energy emitted photons total volume emissivity @xmath23=4@xmath2(@xmath26@xmath27)@xmath28 @xmath26 distance observation to source adopt @xmath26@xmath27=8@xmath29 address sed emitted @xmath0-rays cases different power - law index @xmath30 injected protons values 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 mss red giants disrupted by massive black hole @xmath31 3)three diffusion mechanisms cases ecp ktt bd comparing theoretical spectrum observation data hess central 10pc theoretical energy distribution best observation data star disrupted black hole red giant diffusion mechanism effective confinement protons ecp ) power - law index injected relativistic protons -1.9 investigated spectrum required hadronic model produce 10 tev @xmath0-ray emission detected by hess center galaxycomparing observations power - law index initial spectrum injected protons -1.9 result based tidal disruption red giant black hole considered propagation protons target gas ecp scenario | 0.254883 | 1,248 | 663 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,948 | we consider the problem of coherence loss in a stroboscopic high resolution radar ranging due to phase instability of the probing and reference radio signals .
requirements to the coherence of reference generators in stroboscopic signal processing system are formulated .
the results of statistical modeling are presented .
coherence loss in stroboscopic radar ranging in the problem of asteroid size estimation v. d. zakharchenko , i. g. kovalenko , v. yu .
ryzhkov _ volgograd state university , universitetskij pr .
, 100 , volgograd 400062 , russia _ _ keywords _ near - earth objects , asteroids , stroboscopic radar observations , wideband radio signals | development of the methods that allow improving accuracy of determining the asteroid sizes ( i.e. whether they measuredozens or hundreds meters in diameter ) is important for correct estimateof damage they can cause ( either regional or global catastrophes , respectively ) . at the same time
this research can be interesting for specialists who study shapes and the surface geometry of small bodies of the solar system . in our previous works
@xcite we proposed the method to estimate sizes of passive cosmic objects which method utilizes the radiolocation probing by ultra - high - resolving nanosecond signals for obtaining radar signatures .
the method involves radio pulse strobing of reflected ultra - high - resolving signals from the surface of the cosmic object .
the complete coherence of the probing and reflected signals is an essential condition of the method .
however such a condition corresponds to idealized case when no phase instabilities exist in the signal processing system .
the real sources of reference oscillations have nonzero instant instability of frequency which leads to loss of coherence at large signal lags ( large distances ) .
this factor restricts performance of coherent processing methods and leads to reduction of signal - to - noise ratio at the output of a stroboscopic system . in the analysis of time scale transformation of broadband radio
signals @xcite the complete coherence of carrier frequencies of the measured and the reference oscillations is commonly assumed .
such a concept corresponds to an absence of phase instabilities in the signal processing system . in real devices
this condition can be broken due to deviations of reference generator frequency and phase , instabilities of delays in a signal path and other factors .
these factors restrict performance of coherent processing methods and lead to reduction of signal - to - noise ratio at the output of a stroboscopic system .
let us consider the influence of phase instability of the carrier frequencies of the measured and the reference signals on statistical characteristics of the transformed signal in stroboscopic processing .
we will describe the loss of coherence by a random process @xmath0
, i.e. by a fluctuation component of a phase difference between the received and the strobe radio signals
. the statistical characteristics of the phase difference @xmath0 are considered to be known . in the analysis
we will assume that the coefficient of spectral transformation @xmath1 is large enough to use asymptotic estimates .
the model of stroboscopic processing of the reflected signals ( fig .
[ fig:1 ] ) differs from one considered in the work @xcite by the low - pass filter being replaced with the tracking filter which adaptively tunes to differential frequency of carriers @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the carrier frequency of the probing signal , @xmath4 is the radial velocity of an asteroid . for an exact determination of differential frequency @xmath5
, the radial velocity @xmath4 of an asteroid has to be measured independently using narrow - band methods based on center of mass of the doppler signal spectrum .
one of such effective methods is the method of real - time assessment of radial velocity by means of fractional differentiation of a doppler signal considered in the previous work of the authors @xcite .
let us represent the complex models of the received @xmath6 and the reference @xmath7 signals @xcite including phase instability @xmath0 in the form @xmath8 } } , \qquad \dot{a}(t ) = \sum_{k=0}^n { a_1(t - kt_1)e^{j\omega_1 t}},\ ] ] where @xmath9 and @xmath10 are the complex envelopes providing high range resolution ; @xmath11 , @xmath12 are the repetition periods of the signal and the strobe ; @xmath13 ; @xmath14 is the sampling increment ( @xmath15 ) .
the value of stroboscopic sample of a signal in the @xmath16-th sampling period can be presented as @xmath17 } dt.\ ] ] let us assume @xmath0 be a stationary random zero - mean process with correlation window @xmath18 exceeding the duration of strobe signals .
let us suppose also that slow phase displacements are tracked by stabilizing system , wherefore one can neglect the correlation of adjacent samples @xmath19 and set @xmath20 .
this allows for presentation of the sample @xmath21 in the form @xmath22}}{2 t } \int_{0}^{t } a(t^{\prime } ) a_1(t^{\prime}-k\delta t ) dt = \dot{y}_{k0 } e^{j\theta_k}.\ ] ] where @xmath23 is the sample of the random process @xmath0 and @xmath24 stands for the stroboscopic sample when there is no phase instability in the signal processing system . to ensure the mode of `` ultra - high - resolution '' of radar signatures of asteroids
@xcite one has to use nanosecond signals with pulse ratio of order @xmath25 , thus , the aforementioned approximations are perfectly acceptable . the average value ( mathematical expectation ) of samples obtained by averaging over phase @xmath26 can be expressed as @xmath27 where @xmath28 \rangle = \chi_{\theta}(1)$ ] ; @xmath29 is the characteristic function of the distribution law of phase fluctuations @xmath30 .
for the normal process with zero mean @xmath31 this value is equal to @xmath32 < 1 $ ] .
variance of samples @xmath21 amounts to @xmath33 under the assumptions made .
the ratio of variance to squared mean value is @xmath34 it has the meaning of relative power level of output noise resulting from phase fluctuations .
this ratio can be significantly reduced by increasing the spectral transformation coefficient @xmath35 at the expense of sampling step @xmath36 decrease and by using data storage in a system digital filter . in this case
the variance @xmath37 will be lowered by a factor @xmath38 where @xmath38 is the accumulation coefficient @xcite .
given that the filter and the spectrally compressed signal band are adaptively matched , the value @xmath38 is asymptotically equivalent to the number of sampling steps @xmath36 packed in the signal duration @xmath39 : @xmath40 .
( mathematical expectation and root - mean - square deviation ) vs. phase instability @xmath41 for different values of accumulation coefficient @xmath38.,scaledwidth=100.0% ]
we performed numerical simulation of processing in the radio pulse strobing scheme ( fig .
[ fig:1 ] ) of the signal @xmath42 $ ] reflected by a single bright point of the surface of a moving asteroid .
the envelopes of the probing and strobing @xmath43 signals were chosen identical : @xmath44 $ ] with the effective duration @xmath45 determined according to the method of moments @xcite : @xmath46 .
the random process @xmath0 was specified as a sequence of uncorrelated samples @xmath47 with the normal distribution : @xmath48 .
the filter s transfer function was rectangular with the bandwidth equal to the width of the transformed signal power spectrum at @xmath49 @xmath50 ( 20db ) level .
since the energy of received signal is important for optimal reception under additive noise conditions @xcite , the influence of phase instability was estimated as a decrease of the mean signal s energy @xmath51 at the output of the signal processing filter , relative to the energy @xmath52 under full coherence condition ( @xmath53 ) . fig .
[ fig:2 ] demonstrates statistical characteristics of the output signal of the stroboscopic signal processing system for different accumulation coefficients in the filter obtained by statistical modeling at specified values @xmath54 ; @xmath55 ; @xmath56 ; @xmath57 . the quantity @xmath58 corresponding to signal s energy decrease at the output of the band - pass filter of the stroboscopic signal processing system vs. phase instability is plotted in fig .
[ fig:2 ] .
the relative errors caused by phase instability are also shown .. presented results of statistical modeling are obtained by averaging over 100 simulation runs .
as previously noted @xcite , for a cosmic object of about 50 m in size the range resolution of @xmath59 m can be provided by coherent stroboscopic signal processing of signals with duration @xmath60 ns in the x - range ( @xmath61 ghz ) and frequency band @xmath62 mhz . as it can be seen from fig .
[ fig:2 ] decrease of mean received signal power by half corresponds to the phase instability of @xmath63 rad .
the value of phase deviation @xmath64 caused by a short - time frequency instability @xmath65 and by finite signal propagation time @xmath66 is @xmath67 it represents the wiener process @xcite with normal distribution .
the upper - bound estimate of phase difference gives @xmath68 .
for operation of stroboscopic radar station at range @xmath69 with acceptable phase instability of @xmath70 rad it is required to ensure @xmath71 .
this condition ensures that the noise level does not exceed @xmath72 db at the accumulation coefficient @xmath73 . at the contemporary technology level the stability of reference generators with relative error
no grater than @xmath74 , which corresponds to @xmath75 hz in the x - range , is quite realizable @xcite .
thus , the system can functionally operate within 5 million km distance .
loss of coherence in stroboscopic radar ranging systems caused by phase instabilities of the reference sources leads to sensitivity degradation and is equivalent to the effects of modulating interference .
noise reduction at the output of the stroboscopic converter caused by loss of coherence can be achieved by reducing the sample step @xmath76 with corresponding increase of the processing time .
we are grateful to vitaly korolev for the help at vectorization of drawings and victor levi for careful reading of manuscript .
the work is fulfilled within the framework of projects supported by grants from the russian foundation for basic research 15 - 47 - 02438-r - povolzhie - a and 14 - 02 - 97001-r - povolzhie - a . | methods determining asteroid sizes important for damage regional or global catastrophes research interesting for specialists shapes surface geometry of small bodies solar system proposed method to estimate sizes passive cosmic objects utilizes radiolocation probing by ultra - high - resolving signals for radar signatures method involves radio pulse strobing of reflected signals from surface cosmic object complete coherence of probing reflected signals essential condition condition corresponds to no phase instabilities signal processing system real sources reference oscillations have nonzero instability frequency leads to loss coherence at large signal lags restricts performance processing leads to reduction signal - to - noise ratio analysis time scale transformation broadband radio signals complete coherence of carrier frequencies reference oscillations assumed corresponds to absence phase instabilities real devices condition can be broken due to deviations reference generator frequency phase instabilities delays signal path factors restrict performance processing lead to reduction signal - to - noise ratio consider influence of phase instability frequencies on statistical characteristics transformed signal in stroboscopic processing describe loss of coherence by random processfluctuation component phase difference between received strobe radio signals statistical characteristics phase difference @xmath0 known coefficient spectral transformation @xmath1 large asymptotic estimates model stroboscopic processing reflected signals differs by low - pass filter replaced with tracking filter tunes to differential frequency carriers @xmath2 @xmath3 carrier frequency probing signal @xmath4 radial velocity asteroid exact determination differential frequency @xmath5 radial velocity @xmath4 asteroid measured independently narrow - band methods center mass doppler signal spectrum real - time assessment radial velocity fractional differentiation doppler signal represent complex models of received @xmath6 reference @xmath7 signals @xcite including phase instability @xmath0 form @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 complex envelopes high range resolution @xmath11 @xmath12 repetition periods signal strobe @xmath13 @xmath14 sampling increment @xmath15 ) value stroboscopic sample signal in @xmath16-th sampling period presented as @xmath17assume @xmath0 stationary random zero - mean process correlation @xmath18 exceeding duration strobe signals slow phase displacements tracked by stabilizing system neglect correlation samples @xmath19 @xmath20 presentation sample @xmath21 form @xmath22}} @xmath23 sample random process @xmath0 @xmath24 stroboscopic sample no phase instability signal processing ultra - high - resolution radar signatures asteroids use nanosecond signals pulse ratio order @xmath25 approximations acceptable average value samples averaging over phase @xmath26 expressed @xmath27 @xmath28 = _{\theta}(1) @xmath29 characteristic function distribution law phase fluctuations normal process zero mean @xmath31 value equal to @xmath32 < 1 $ variance of samples @xmath21 amounts to @xmath33 ratio variance to squared mean value @xmath34 relative power level output noise phase fluctuations ratio reduced increasing spectral transformation coefficient @xmath35 sampling step @xmath36 decrease using data storage system digital filtervariance @xmath37 lowered by factor @xmath38 accumulation coefficient @xcite filter spectrally compressed signal band matched value @xmath38 equivalent to sampling steps @xmath36 signal duration @xmath39 phase instability @xmath41 for different values accumulation coefficient simulation processing in radio pulse strobing scheme signal @xmath42 reflected by bright point surface moving asteroid envelopes probing strobing @xmath43 signals identical effective duration @xmath45 determined method of moments random process @xmath0 sequence of uncorrelated samples @xmath47 normal distribution : @xmath48 filter s transfer function rectangular bandwidth equal to transformed signal power spectrum at @xmath49 @xmath50 20db level energy received signal important for reception under noise conditions influence phase instability mean signal s energy @xmath51 at output processing filter relative to energy @xmath52 under full coherence condition fig statistical characteristics of output signal stroboscopic signal processing system for different accumulation coefficients statistical modeling at values @xmath54quantity @xmath58 signal energy decrease band - pass filter stroboscopic processing system phase instability plotted fig relative errors phase instability shown results modeling 100 simulation runs cosmic object 50 m range resolution @xmath59 m stroboscopic signal processing duration @xmath60 ns x - range ghz frequency band @xmath62 mhz decrease received signal power half phase instability @xmath63 rad phase deviation @xmath64 short - time frequency instability @xmath65 finite signal propagation time @xmath66 @xmath67 represents process @xcite normal distribution upper - bound estimate phase difference @xmath68 operation stroboscopic radar station range @xmath69 phase instability @xmath70 rad ensure @xmath71 noise level exceed @xmath72 db accumulation coefficient @xmath73 stability reference generators relative error than @xmath74 @xmath75 hz x - range realizable @xcite system operate within 5 million km distance loss coherence stroboscopic radar phase instabilities sensitivity degradation modulating interferencenoise reduction output stroboscopic converter reducing sample step @xmath76 processing time grateful to vitaly korolev vectorization drawings victor levi reading manuscript work fulfilled projects grants russian foundation basic research 15 - 47 - 02438-r - 14 - 02 - 97001-r - | 0.348722 | 2,165 | 1,072 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,949 | the @xmath0 model in @xmath1 dimensions presents some features in common with yang - mills theories : asymptotic freedom , trace anomaly , non - petrurbative generation of a mass gap .
an analytical approach to determine the termodynamical properties of the @xmath2 model is presented and compared to lattice results . here
the focus is on the pressure : it is shown how to derive the pressure in the cjt formalism at the one - loop level by making use of the auxiliary field method .
then , the pressure is compared to lattice results . address= institut fr theoretische physik , johann wolfgang goethe - universitt , + max - von - laue - str . 1 , d-60438 frankfurt , germany address= institut fr theoretische physik , johann wolfgang goethe - universitt , + max - von - laue - str . 1
, d-60438 frankfurt , germany address= institut fr theoretische physik , johann wolfgang goethe - universitt , + max - von - laue - str . 1 , d-60438 frankfurt , germany address= institut fr theoretische physik , johann wolfgang goethe - universitt , + max - von - laue - str . 1 , d-60438 frankfurt , germany , altaddress= fakultt fr physik , universitt bielefeld , + universittsstr .
25 , d-33615 bielefeld , germany | the @xmath0 model , in @xmath1 dimensions and at nonzero temperature @xmath3 , is defined by the following generating functional : @xmath4 \text { , } \label{z}%\ ] ] whereas @xmath5 is the dimensionless coupling constant , @xmath6 is a normalization constant , and @xmath7 is a simple free ( euclidean ) lagrangian @xmath8 , with @xmath9 .
@xmath10 consists of @xmath11 scalar real fields , which for future convenience we denote as @xmath12 .
the fields are constrained by the condition @xmath13 which is incorporated by the delta function in eq .
( [ z ] ) .
this nonlinear constraint enforces the thermodynamics of the model on an @xmath14 dimensional hypersphere and induces the interactions between the fields .
this model is interesting because it shares some properties with yang - mills theories in 4 dimensions , see the review paper @xcite and refs .
therein : \(i ) the coupling constant @xmath5 is dimensionless and the the theory is renormalizable .
it turns out that it has a negative @xmath15 function , thus showing asymptotic freedom .
\(ii ) the model is conformal invariant at the classical level , but , just as yang - mills theories in four dimensions , at the quantum level an energy scale emerges due to quantum corrections and a non - perturbative mass - gap emerges ( trace anomaly ) @xcite : although the lagrangian @xmath7 in eq .
( [ z ] ) describes @xmath11 massless fields , a nonzero mass @xmath16 is generated dynamically due to the interactions , where @xmath17 is the renormalization parameter . since the mass is non - analytic in @xmath5 , it would vanish in perturbation theory about @xmath18 .
\(iii ) for @xmath19 the model has instantons and , at finite temperature , calorons @xcite .
it is then possible to study in a simplified framework what is the role of these nonperturbative field configurations in thermodynamics ( for the related case in ym theories see for instance refs .
@xcite and refs .
therein ) .
the aim of this work is to present an analytical study of the nonlinear @xmath0 model in @xmath1 dimensions at nonzero temperature .
we compute the pressure by employing the cjt formalism @xcite and using the auxiliary field method in the one - loop approximation ( for other thermodynamical quantities and the two - loop calculation and technical details see ref .
@xcite ) . for the case
@xmath19 we compare the pressure with the results of a first - principles monte carlo lattice calculation using the integral method . at the one - loop level
, a good agreement is found for small temperature , but the analytic result for the pressure is too large when @xmath3 increases . when going to the two - loop approximation , a considerable improvement in the high @xmath3 domain is obtained , although the low-@xmath3 part is slightly worsened .
following ref . @xcite we rewrite the partition function in eq .
( [ z ] ) by using the mathematically well - defined ( i.e. convergent ) form of the @xmath20-function@xmath21 \right\ } } \text { } % \ ] ] thus obtaining @xmath22}$ ] , where@xmath23 the quantity @xmath24 is an auxiliary field serving as a lagrange multiplier . upon shifting the fields @xmath25 and @xmath24 by their condensates , @xmath26 and @xmath27 ,
a bilinear mixing term of the type @xmath28 arises .
it can be eliminated by a further shift of the @xmath24 field , @xmath29 in this way non - diagonal propagators are avoided .
\(i ) @xmath49 @xmath50 : @xmath51 ^{-1}\text { .}\nonumber\ ] ] \(ii ) @xmath52 @xmath53 : @xmath54 ^{-1}\text { .}\nonumber\ ] ] there is no solution to the gap equations of case ( i ) , since the integral @xmath55^{-1}}{2\pi k } d k\ ] ] is divergent , whereas @xmath56 is finite .
therefore , contrary to the four - dimensional case @xcite , case ( ii ) is the right choice .
this means that in two dimensions there is no spontaneous symmetry breaking of the global @xmath0 symmetry of the nonlinear @xmath0 model .
this reflects the mermin - wagner - coleman theorem , see ref .
@xcite , which forbids spontaneous breakdown of a continuous symmetry in a homogeneous system in one spatial dimension .
the model needs to be regularized and then renormalized .
here we just report the results of these steps and we refer to ref .
@xcite for a detailed treatment .
the renormalized coupling constant @xmath57 develops a dependence on the renormalization scale @xmath17 : @xmath58 thus showing that the theory is asymptotically free . at nonzero
@xmath3 the mass of the excitations is @xmath59 for @xmath60 we obtain @xmath61 which shows that a mass gap is generated and that the dilatation symmetry is broken by quantum fluctuations ( the energy scale @xmath62 is dynamically generated )
. then the function @xmath63 rises linearly with @xmath3 when @xmath3 increases : this is an expected properties for a gas of quasiparticles and takes place also in the deconfined phase of yang - mills theories , e.g. ref .
@xcite and refs . therein . .
the upper right line marks the stefan - boltzmann limit @xmath64.,scaledwidth=66.0% ] we now turn to the pressure of the system , which is , up to a sign , identical to the minimum of the effective potential : @xmath65 .
its renormalized form reads@xmath66 once the pressure is known one can compute the energy density @xmath67 and the trace anomaly @xmath68 using the first principle of thermodynamics : @xmath69 , @xmath70 . the one - loop pressure of eq .
( [ pressure ] ) is reported in fig .
[ fig : pressure ] and is compared with a lattice study of this system @xcite for the case @xmath71 one can notice that the result is good for small temperatures , but it does not match the lattice data when the temperature increases .
this result is indeed expected : the one - loop expression in eq .
( [ pressure ] ) reduces to @xmath72 for large @xmath3 , which corresponds to a free gas of @xmath11 non - interacting particles .
this result can not be correct , because the constraint expressed by the @xmath20 function in eq .
( [ z ] ) eliminates one degree of freedom .
one can go beyond the one - loop results and study the pressure at the two - loop level using the formalism developed in @xcite , see also ref .
a better agreement is obtained for large @xmath73 although the low-@xmath3 domain is slightly worsened .
indeed , it is possible to show analytically that for large @xmath3 the two - loop pressure approaches the correct value @xmath74 .
in this work we have studied the @xmath0 model in 1 + 1 dimensions at nonzero @xmath75 we have described how a mass gap is generated for @xmath60 , thus demonstrating the occurrence of dimensional transmutation .
we have then shown explicitly the analytic results for the pressure at the one - loop level and briefly commented on the results at the two - loop level .
finally , these analytic expressions for the pressure have been compared with lattice results , see fig .
[ fig : pressure ] .
more advanced analytical calculations can be performed in the future and compared to lattice data : in fact , this system represents a good tool to test nonperturbative approaches , which can then be applied to the more difficult case of yang - mills theories in four dimensions .
v. a. novikov , m. a. shifman , a. i. vainshtein and v. i. zakharov , phys .
rept . * 116 * ( 1984 ) 103 [ sov .
j. part .
* 17 * ( 1986 ) 204 ] ; fiz .
chast . atom .
yadra * 17 * ( 1986 ) 472 .
u. wolff , nucl .
b * 334 * ( 1990 ) 581 .
f. bruckmann , phys .
* 100 * ( 2008 ) 051602 [ arxiv:0707.0775 [ hep - th ] ] ; j. o. andersen , d. boer and h. j. warringa , phys
. rev .
d * 74 * ( 2006 ) 045028 [ hep - th/0602082 ] ; i. affleck , phys .
b * 92 * ( 1980 ) 149 .
r. hofmann , int .
j. mod .
phys . a * 20 * ( 2005 ) 4123 [ hep - th/0504064 ]
; u. herbst and r. hofmann , isrn high energy phys .
* 2012 * ( 2012 ) 373121 [ hep - th/0411214 ] ; f. giacosa and r. hofmann , prog .
* 118 * ( 2007 ) 759 [ hep - th/0609172 ] .
f. giacosa , phys .
d * 83 * ( 2011 ) 114002 [ arxiv:1009.4588 [ hep - ph ] ] ; f. brau and f. buisseret , phys . rev .
d * 79 * ( 2009 ) 114007 [ arxiv:0902.4836 [ hep - ph ] ] ; a. peshier , b. kampfer , o. p. pavlenko and g. soff , phys . rev .
d * 54 * ( 1996 ) 2399 ; p. castorina and m. mannarelli , phys .
c * 75 * ( 2007 ) 054901 [ hep - ph/0701206 [ hep - ph ] ] . | @xmath0 model @xmath1 dimensions nonzero temperature @xmath3 defined by generating functional : @xmath4 @xmath5 dimensionless coupling constant @xmath6 normalization constant @xmath7 simple free lagrangian @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 scalar real fields @xmath12 fields constrained by condition @xmath13 delta function nonlinear constraint enforces thermodynamics on @xmath14 dimensional hypersphere induces interactions between fields model shares properties with yang - mills theories in 4 dimensions coupling constant @xmath5 dimensionless theory renormalizable negative @xmath15 function asymptotic freedom model conformal invariant at classical level quantum level energy scale emerges due to quantum corrections non - perturbative mass - gap emerges lagrangian @xmath7 describes @xmath11 massless fields nonzero mass @xmath16 generated dynamically due to interactions @xmath17 renormalization parameter mass non - analytic in @xmath5 in perturbation theory about @xmath18 @xmath19 model has instantons finite temperature calorons @xcitepossible study role nonperturbative field configurations in thermodynamics see refs . @xcite aim work present analytical study nonlinear @xmath0 model in @xmath1 dimensions at nonzero temperature compute pressure cjt formalism @xcite auxiliary field method one - loop approximation two - loop see ref . @xcite case @xmath19 compare pressure with first - principles monte carlo lattice calculation integral method one - loop good agreement for small temperature result pressure too large when @xmath3 increases two - loop approximation improvement in high @xmath3 domain low-@xmath3 part slightly worsened @xcite rewrite partition function in eq . ( [ z defined convergent form @xmath20-function@xmath21 obtaining @xmath22}$ @xmath23 quantity @xmath24 auxiliary field lagrange multiplier shifting fields @xmath25 @xmath24 bilinear mixing term type @xmath28 arises eliminated by further shift @xmath24 field @xmath29 non - diagonal propagators avoided @xmath49 @xmath50 : @xmath51@xmath52 no solution to gap equations case i ) integral @xmath55 divergent @xmath56 finite contrary to four - dimensional case case ( ii ) right choice two dimensions no spontaneous symmetry breaking global symmetry nonlinear @xmath0 model reflects mermin - wagner - coleman theorem forbids spontaneous breakdown continuous symmetry homogeneous system dimension model needs regularized renormalized report results refer to detailed treatment renormalized coupling constant @xmath57 on renormalization scale @xmath17 : @xmath58 theory asymptotically free nonzero @xmath3 mass excitations @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 mass gap generated dilatation symmetry broken by quantum fluctuations energy scale @xmath62 dynamically generated function @xmath63 rises linearly with @xmath3 when @xmath3 increases expected for gas of quasiparticles deconfined phase yang - mills theories upper right line marks stefan - boltzmann limit @xmath64=66.to pressure system identical to minimum effective potential : @xmath65 renormalized form reads@xmath66 pressure known compute energy density @xmath67 trace anomaly @xmath68 using first principle thermodynamics : @xmath69, @xmath70 one - loop pressure of reported in fig . compared with lattice study @xcite @xmath71 result good for small temperatures match lattice data when temperature increases expected one - loop expression reduces to @xmath72 for large @xmath3 corresponds to free gas of @xmath11 non - interacting particles correct constraint @xmath20 function eliminates one degree freedom study pressure at two - loop level using formalism @xcite better agreement for large @xmath73 low-@xmath3 domain worsened show for large @xmath3 two - loop pressure approaches correct value @xmath74 studied @xmath0 model in 1 + 1 dimensions at nonzero @xmath75 described mass gap for @xmath60 dimensional transmutation shown analytic results for pressure at one - loop level commented on at two - loop level analytic expressions pressure compared with lattice results see fig .advanced analytical calculations future compared lattice data system good tool test nonperturbative approaches applied difficult yang - mills theories four dimensions novikov shifman vainshtein zakharov . rept. 116 1984 ) 103 17 1986 ) 204 fiz atom yadra 17 1986 ) 472 wolff nucl. 334 1990 ) 581 bruckmann phys . 100 2008 ) 051602 arxiv:0707.0775 hep - th andersen d boer warringa . rev 74 2006 ) 045028 hep - th/0602082 affleck . 92 1980 ) 149 hofmann 20 2005 ) 4123 hep - th/0504064 herbst r hofmann high energy phys . 2012 ) 373121 hep - th/0411214 giacosa hofmann prog. 118 2007 ) 759 hep - th/0609172 ] giacosa phys . 83 2011 ) 114002 arxiv:1009.4588 hep - ph brau buisseret phys . rev 79 2009 ) 114007 arxiv:0902.4836 hep - ph peshier kampfer pavlenko soff phys . rev54 * 1996 ) 2399 castorina mannarelli. 75 * 2007 ) 054901 hep - ph/0701206 | 0.350959 | 2,320 | 1,187 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,954 | we introduce the galactic bulge survey ( gbs ) and we provide the source list for the region that has been observed to date . among the goals of the gbs are constraining the neutron star equation of state and the black hole mass distribution via the identification of eclipsing neutron star and black hole low mass x ray binaries . the latter goal
will , in addition , be obtained by significantly enlarging the number of black hole systems for which a black hole mass can be derived .
further goals include constraining x ray binary formation scenarios , in particular the common envelope phase and the occurrence of kicks , via source - type number counts and an investigation of the spatial distribution of x ray binaries , respectively
. the gbs targets two strips of @xmath0 ( 12 square degrees in total ) , one above ( @xmath1 ) and one below ( @xmath2 ) the galactic plane in the direction of the galactic center at both x ray and optical wavelengths . by avoiding the galactic plane ( @xmath3 ) we limit the influence of extinction on the x ray and optical emission but still sample relatively large number densities of sources .
the survey is designed such that a large fraction of the x ray sources can be identified from their optical spectra .
the x ray survey , by design , covers a large area on the sky while the depth is shallow using 2 ks per pointing . in this way
we maximize the predicted number ratio of ( quiescent ) low mass x ray binaries to cataclysmic variables .
the survey is approximately homogeneous in depth to an 0.5 - 10 kev flux of 7.7@xmath4 .
so far , we have covered about two thirds ( 8.3 square degrees ) of the projected survey area with providing over 1200 unique x
ray sources .
we discuss the characteristics and the variability of the brightest of these sources . | x ray observations are excellent probes of coronally active and accreting sources . whereas studies of x ray sources in our galaxy have to a large extent focussed on bright systems , investigations of fainter source classes
have typically been done in the galactic center ( e.g. @xcite ) . there , however , crowding and extinction make it more difficult to identify the correct optical and/or infrared counterparts for large fractions of the sources ( e.g. @xcite ) .
it is clear from previous surveys that multi wavelength observations are vital for classifying faint x
ray sources since x ray spectral information alone is rarely sufficient .
classification is important for various science goals as we outline below .
the galactic bulge survey ( gbs ) we present in this paper was designed to allow multi
wavelength observations of the detected x ray sources .
the gbs consists of and optical imaging of two strips of @xmath5 , one centered @xmath6 above the galactic plane and the other @xmath6 below the plane .
we have chosen this area as the source density is still high , but by excluding @xmath7 we avoid the regions that are most heavily affected by extinction and source confusion ( see figure [ changbs ] ) . in table
[ tab : reference ] we provide a reference table for the acronyms used in this paper .
.reference table for the acronyms used in this paper .
[ cols= " < , < " , ] @xmath8 multiple sources from the rosat pointed source catalog are consistent with the position .
we list the nearest one .
+ @xmath9 these two sources are 4.8 apart ; these are likely two detections of the same source .
we have started the galactic bulge survey ( gbs ) with the goals : i ) to identify quiescent , eclipsing ns and bh x ray binaries that are bright enough in the optical or near infrared to allow phase resolved spectroscopic observations tailored to measure the compact object mass .
ii ) to constrain binary population synthesis and x ray binary formation and evolution models by means of a source number count and a study of the spatial distribution of x ray binaries . in this paper
we have presented the source list and some properties of the x ray sources of observations covering @xmath10two - thirds ( @xmath11 square degrees ) of the total envisaged survey area of 12 square degrees .
the accurate source position will help identify the optical counterparts .
the 1234 x ray sources that have been discovered so far compares well with the total number of @xmath12 x ray sources that we predict we should detect in the full 12 square degrees . however , this is of course no guarantee that the number of sources per source class are close to those we calculated .
we compared our source list with the source list of the rass .
two bsc rass sources , 1rxs j175113.2 - 293842 and 1rxs j174220.8 - 273736 , are not detected in our gbs survey , indicating a decrease in flux with factors larger than 200 and 500 , respectively .
furthermore , we compared our source list with the sources found in the catalog of sources derived from pointed hri and pspc rosat observations that fall inside the gbs area ( see table 3 ) .
we also imaged the complete survey area using optical observations obtained with the 4 m blanco telescope at ctio .
furthermore , we re - imaged the survey area @xmath1330 times in the @xmath14 band to search for ( periodic ) variable sources .
results of these campaigns will be presented in forthcoming papers .
we are in the process of obtaining optical spectroscopic and photometric observations of all optical proposed counterparts in the error circle to classify the x ray sources .
this step is crucial to achieve our science goals outlined above .
a full discussion of all known information on all the x ray sources is beyond the scope of this paper and we defer the discussion of the other fainter sources to a forthcoming paper , where they will be discussed together with optical photometric and spectroscopic information .
p.g.j . and g.n .
acknowledge support from the netherlands organisation for scientific research . r.i.h . ,
c.t.b , v.j.m . , and l.g .
would like to acknowledge support from national science foundation grant no .
ast-0908789 and nasa / louisiana board of regents grant nnx07at62a / leqsf(2007 - 10 ) phase3 - 02 .
coh is supported by nserc .
ds acknowledges an stfc advanced fellowship .
tjm and ad thank stfc for support via a rolling grant to the university of southampton . | x ray observations excellent probes coronally active accreting sources studies in focussed on bright systems investigations fainter source classes typically in galactic center e @xcite ) crowding extinction difficult to identify correct optical infrared counterparts for large fractions sources multi wavelength observations vital for classifying faint x ray sources spectral information alone rarely sufficient classification important for science goals galactic bulge survey ) multi wavelength observations of x ray sources gbs consists of optical imaging of two strips of @xmath5 above galactic plane below plane chosen area source density high excluding @xmath7 regions affected by extinction source confusion figure reference table for acronyms used paper @xmath8 multiple sources from rosat pointed source catalog consistent with position nearest one + @xmath9 two sources 4.8 apart likely two detections of same source started galactic bulge survey with goals identify quiescent eclipsing ns bh x ray binaries bright enough in optical near infrared to allow phase resolved spectroscopic observations compact object massconstrain binary population synthesis x ray binary formation evolution models source number count study spatial distribution x ray binaries presented source list properties x ray sources covering @xmath10two - thirds @xmath11 square degrees total survey area 12 square degrees accurate source position optical counterparts 1234 x ray sources discovered with @xmath12 sources full 12 square degrees no guarantee sources per source class compared source list with rass two bsc rass sources 1rxs j175113.2 - 293842 j174220.8 - 273736 not detected in gbs survey indicating decrease flux with factors larger than 200 500 compared source list with sources catalog sources pointed hri pspc rosat observations gbs area table 3 imaged complete survey area using observations 4 m blanco telescope re - imaged survey area @xmath1330 times @xmath14 band search for variable sources results presented in forthcoming papers obtaining optical spectroscopic photometric observations of optical proposed counterparts in error circle classify x ray sources crucial science goals full discussion information x ray sources beyond scope defer discussion other fainter sources to forthcoming paper.j.n acknowledge support netherlands scientific research r v l.g support national science foundation grant ast-0908789 nasa louisiana board regents grant nnx07at62a(2007 - 10 phase3 - 02 coh supported nserc ds acknowledges stfc fellowship thank stfc support rolling grant university southampton | 0.181386 | 1,014 | 492 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,956 | let @xmath0 be the set of ordered labeled trees on @xmath1 .
a maximal decreasing subtree of an ordered labeled tree is defined by the maximal ordered subtree from the root with all edges being decreasing . in this paper
, we study a new refinement @xmath2 of @xmath0 , which is the set of ordered labeled trees whose maximal decreasing subtree has @xmath3 vertices . | an _ ordered tree _ is a rooted tree in which children of each vertex are ordered . figure [ fig : ord ] shows all the ordered tree with @xmath4 vertices .
it is well known ( see ( * ? ? ?
* exercise 6.19 ) ) that the number of ordered trees with @xmath5 vertices is given by the @xmath6th catalan number @xmath7 .
7.00mm7.00mm123.00mm43.00 mm ( 328.82 , 102.05)(0,0 ) ( 0,0 ) vertices , title="fig : " ] an _ ordered labeled tree _ is an ordered tree whose vertices are labeled by distinct nonnegative integers . in most cases , an ordered labeled tree with @xmath5 vertices is identified with an ordered tree on the vertex set @xmath8:=\{0,\dots , n\}$ ] .
let @xmath0 be the set of ordered labeled trees on @xmath8 $ ] .
clearly the cardinality of @xmath0 is given by @xmath9 is a rising factorial . for a given ordered labeled tree @xmath10 , a _
maximal decreasing subtree _ of @xmath10 is defined by the maximal ordered subtree from the root with all edges being decreasing , denoted by @xmath11 .
figure [ fig : tree ] illustrates the maximal decreasing subtree of a given tree @xmath10 . let @xmath2 be the set of ordered labeled trees on @xmath8 $ ] with its maximal decreasing subtree having @xmath12 edges .
17.00mm16.14mm126.00mm54.14 mm ( 308.98 , 107.72)(0,0 ) ( 0,0),title="fig : " ] ( 42.52,64.81)7 ( 14.17,8.12)8 ( 99.21,8.12)0 ( 127.56,36.46)10 ( 70.87,8.12)4 ( 155.91,8.12)5 ( 99.21,64.81)6 ( 70.87,36.46)2 ( 73.70,93.16)9 ( 42.52,36.46)1 ( 70.87,64.81)3 ( 8.50,93.16)@xmath10 ( 240.94,64.81)7 ( 297.64,64.81)6 ( 269.29,36.46)2 ( 272.13,93.16)9 ( 240.94,36.46)1 ( 269.29,64.81)3 ( 206.93,93.16)@xmath11 in this paper we present a formula for @xmath13 , which makes a refined enumeration of @xmath0 , or a generalization of equation .
note that a similar refinement for the rooted ( unordered ) labeled trees was done before ( see @xcite ) , but the ordered case is more complicated and has quite different features .
from now on we will consider labeled trees only .
so we will omit the word labeled " . recall that @xmath2 is the set of ordered trees on @xmath8 $ ] with its maximal decreasing ordered subtree having @xmath12 edges .
let @xmath14 be the set of ordered trees on @xmath8 $ ] attached additional @xmath15 increasing leaves to decreasing tree with @xmath12 edges .
note that the set @xmath14 first appeared in the ph.d .
thesis @xcite of drake .
let @xmath16 be the set of forests on @xmath17:=\{1,2,\ldots , n\}$ ] consisting of @xmath12 ordered trees , where the @xmath12 roots are not ordered . in figure
[ fig : forest ] , the first two forests are the same , but the third one is a different forest in @xmath18 .
-3.00mm-3.86mm106.00mm14.14 mm ( 308.98 , 51.02)(0,0 ) ( 0,0),title="fig : " ] ( 45.35,8.12 ) ( 187.09,8.12 ) ( 255.12,8.12 ) ( 76.54,36.46 ) ( 133.23,36.46 ) ( 246.61,36.46 ) ( 34.02,36.46 ) ( 175.75,36.46 ) ( 289.13,36.46 ) ( 17.01,8.12 ) ( 158.74,8.12 ) ( 300.47,8.12 ) ( 93.54,22.29 ) ( 206.93,22.29 ) define the numbers @xmath19 we will show that an ordered tree can be decomposed " into an ordered tree in @xmath20 and a forest in @xmath21 .
thus it is crucial to count the numbers @xmath22 and @xmath23 .
[ lem : znk ] the numbers @xmath22 satisfy the recursion : @xmath24 with the following boundary conditions : @xmath25 where @xmath26 is defined by @xmath27 .
consider a tree @xmath28 in @xmath14 .
the tree @xmath28 with @xmath5 vertices consists of its maximal decreasing tree with @xmath3 vertices and the number of increasing leaves is @xmath29 .
note that the vertex @xmath30 is always contained in @xmath31 .
if the vertex @xmath30 is a leaf of @xmath28 , consider the tree @xmath32 by deleting the leaf @xmath30 from @xmath28 .
the number of vertices in @xmath32 and @xmath33 are @xmath6 and @xmath12 , respectively .
so the number of possible trees @xmath32 is @xmath34 .
since we can not attach the vertex @xmath30 to @xmath29 increasing leaves in recovering @xmath28 , there are @xmath35 ways of recovering @xmath28 . thus the number of @xmath28 with the leaf @xmath30 is @xmath36
if the vertex @xmath30 is not a leaf of @xmath28 , then the vertex @xmath30 has at least one increasing leaf .
let the vertex @xmath37 be the leftmost leaf of the vertex @xmath30 and consider the tree @xmath38 obtained by deleting the leaf @xmath37 from @xmath28 .
the number of vertices in @xmath38 and @xmath39 are @xmath6 and @xmath3 , respectively .
so the number of possible trees @xmath38 is @xmath40 .
to recover @xmath28 is to relabel @xmath38 with @xmath8 \setminus { \left\{\ell\right\}}$ ] and to attach the vertex @xmath37 to the vertex @xmath30 . since the number
@xmath37 may be the number from @xmath41 to @xmath6 , the number of @xmath28 without the leaf @xmath30 is @xmath42 which completes the proof of recursion .
since @xmath43 is the set of decreasing ordered trees on @xmath8 $ ] , the equation holds @xcite with the convention @xmath44 . for @xmath45 or @xmath46
, @xmath14 should be empty , so the equation also holds .
[ lem : fnk ] for @xmath47 , we have @xmath48 with @xmath49 consider a forest @xmath50 in @xmath16 .
the forest @xmath50 consists of ( non - ordered ) @xmath12 ordered trees @xmath51 with roots @xmath52 , where @xmath53 . the number of ways for choosing roots @xmath54 from @xmath17 $ ] is equal to @xmath55 . from the _ reverse prfer algorithm ( rp algorithm )
_ in @xcite , the number of ways for adding @xmath29 vertices successively to @xmath12 roots @xmath54 is equal to @xmath56 for @xmath57 , thus the equation holds . by definition , @xmath58 is the set of the empty forest .
so @xmath59 .
since the number @xmath22 is determined by the recurrence relation in lemma [ lem : znk ] , we can count the number @xmath60 with the following theorem .
[ thm : main ] we have @xmath61 and @xmath62 , where @xmath63 is a rising factorial . given an ordered tree @xmath10 in @xmath2 ,
let @xmath28 be the subtree of @xmath10 consisting of @xmath11 and its increasing edges .
if the number of vertices of @xmath28 is @xmath64 , then @xmath28 is a subtree of @xmath10 with @xmath65 increasing leaves . also , the induced subgraph @xmath66 of @xmath10 generated by the @xmath15 vertices not belonging to @xmath11 is a ( non - ordered ) forest consisting of @xmath65 ordered trees whose roots are only increasing leaves of @xmath28
. now let us count the number of ordered trees @xmath67 with @xmath68 where @xmath69 is the set of vertices in @xmath28 .
first of all , the number of ways for selecting a set @xmath70 $ ] is equal to @xmath71 . by attaching @xmath65 increasing leaves to a decreasing tree with @xmath12 edges
, we can make an ordered trees on @xmath69 .
there are exactly @xmath72 ways for making such an ordered subtree on @xmath69 . by the definition of @xmath16 and lemma [ lem : fnk ] ,
the number of ways for constructing the other parts on @xmath73 is equal to @xmath74 since the range of @xmath75 is @xmath76 , the equation holds .
finally , @xmath77 is the set of decreasing ordered trees on @xmath8 $ ] , so @xmath78 holds for @xmath79 .
due to theorem [ thm : main ] , we can calculate @xmath60 for all @xmath6 , @xmath12 .
however a closed form , a recurrence relation , or a generating function of @xmath60 have not been found yet . the following might be a direction for solving the problem : shor @xcite showed that the number @xmath80 , which is the number of rooted trees on @xmath17 $ ] with @xmath12 improper edges , satisfies @xmath81 where an edge @xmath82 is called _ improper _ if @xmath83 is the endpoint closer to root and @xmath83 has a larger label than some descendant of @xmath84 .
zeng @xcite found that the generating function for @xmath85 is the ramanujan polynomial @xmath86 , which is defined by @xmath87 drake @xcite observed that @xmath88 for all @xmath89 , by using the generating function method .
actually , @xmath22 and @xmath90 satisfy the same recursion and initial conditions , so we are able to construct a recursive bijection between these two objects . with this point of view
, it would be interesting to find a certain set of rooted trees of cardinality @xmath60 .
this research was supported by basic science research program through the national research foundation of korea ( nrf ) funded by the ministry of education , science and technology ( 2011 - 0008683 , 2012r1a1a1014154 ) . | ordered tree rooted children each vertex ordered figure shows @xmath4 vertices number trees @xmath5 vertices by @xmath6th number @xmath7 mm ( 328.82 , 102.05)(0,0 vertices ordered labeled tree vertices labeled nonnegative integers tree with @xmath5 vertices identified with vertex set @xmath8 @xmath0 trees on @xmath8 cardinality of @xmath0 by @xmath9 rising factorial @xmath10 maximal decreasing subtree defined by maximal subtree root edges decreasing denoted by @xmath11 figure illustrates maximal decreasing subtree @xmath10 @xmath2 trees @xmath8 maximal decreasing subtree @xmath12 edges 17.00mm16.14mm126.00mm54.14 mm ( 308.98 , 107.72)(0,0 ( 42.52,64.81)7 ( 14.17,8.12)8 99.21,8.12)0 127.56,36.46)10 ( 70.87,8.12)4 155.91,8.12)5 99.21,64.81)6 ( 70.87,36.46)2 ( 73.70,93.16)9 42.52,36.70.87,64.81)3 8.50,93.16)@xmath10 240.94,64.81)7 297.64,64.81)6 269.29,36.46)2 272.13,93.16)9 240.94,36.46)1 269.29,64.81)3 206.93,93.16)@xmath11 formula @xmath13 refined enumeration @xmath0 similar refinement rooted unordered labeled trees ordered case complicated different features consider labeled trees only omit labeled @xmath2 ordered trees @xmath8 decreasing subtree @xmath12 edges @xmath14 ordered trees @xmath8 $ @xmath15 increasing decreasing tree @xmath12 edges @xmath14 ph.d . thesis @xmath16 forests @xmath17 @xmath12 ordered trees @xmath12 roots not ordered first two forests same third different @xmath18 -3.00mm-3.86mm106.00mm14.14 mm ( 308.98 , 51.02) 45.35,8.12 ) 187.09,8.12 ) 255.12,8.12 ) 76.54,36.46 ) 133.23,36.46 ) 246.61,36.46 ) 34.02,36.46 ) 175.75,36.289.13,36.46 17.01,8.12 158.74,8.12 300.47,8.12 93.54,22.29 206.93,22.29 ) define numbers @xmath19 tree into @xmath20 forest @xmath21 count numbers @xmath22 @xmath23 numbers @xmath22 satisfy recursion @xmath24 conditions @xmath25 @xmath26 defined @xmath27 consider tree @xmath28 @xmath14 tree @xmath28 @xmath5 vertices maximal decreasing tree @xmath3 vertices increasing leaves @xmath29 vertex @xmath30 @xmath31 leaf @xmath28 consider tree @xmath32 deleting leaf @xmath30 @xmath28 vertices @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath6 @xmath12 possible trees @xmath32 @xmath34 attach vertex @xmath30 @xmath29 increasing leaves @xmath35 ways recovering @xmath28 number @xmath28 leaf @xmath30 @xmath36 not leaf @xmath28 one increasing leaf vertex @xmath37 leftmost leaf @xmath30 consider tree @xmath38 deleting leaf @xmath37 from @xmath28vertices in @xmath38 are @xmath6 possible trees @xmath38 is @xmath40 recover @xmath28 relabel @xmath38 with @xmath8 attach vertex @xmath37 to @xmath30 @xmath37 from @xmath41 to @xmath6 @xmath28 without leaf @xmath30 is @xmath42 completes recursion @xmath43 decreasing ordered trees on @xmath8 equation holds with @xmath44 @xmath45 or @xmath46 @xmath14 empty equation holds @xmath47 @xmath48 with @xmath49 forest @xmath50 in @xmath16 non - ordered @xmath12 ordered trees @xmath51 with roots @xmath52 ways for choosing roots @xmath54 from @xmath17 equal to @xmath55 reverse algorithm adding @xmath29 vertices to @xmath12 roots @xmath54 equal to @xmath56 for @xmath57 equation holds @xmath58 is empty forest number @xmath22 determined by recurrence relation count number @xmath60 with theorem@xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 rising factorial ordered tree @xmath10 in @xmath2 @xmath28 subtree of @xmath10 @xmath11 increasing edges number vertices @xmath28 @xmath64 subtree @xmath10 @xmath65 increasing leaves induced subgraph @xmath66 @xmath10 @xmath15 vertices non - ordered forest @xmath65 ordered trees roots increasing leaves @xmath28 count ordered trees @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 vertices in @xmath28 number ways selecting set @xmath70 equal to @xmath71 attaching @xmath65 increasing leaves to decreasing tree @xmath12 edges ordered trees on @xmath69 @xmath72 ways ordered subtree @xmath69 ways constructing other parts on @xmath73 equal to @xmath74 range @xmath75 @xmath76 equation holds @xmath77 decreasing ordered trees on @xmath8 @xmath78 holds for @xmath79 calculate @xmath60 for @xmath6 @xmath12 closed form recurrence relation generating function of @xmath60 founddirection solving problem shor @xcite showed @xmath80 rooted trees @xmath17 @xmath12 improper edges satisfies @xmath81 edge @xmath82 improper @xmath83 endpoint closer root larger label descendant @xmath84 @xcite found generating function @xmath85 ramanujan polynomial @xmath86 defined @xmath87 @xcite observed @xmath88 @xmath89 generating function method @xmath22 @xmath90 satisfy recursion initial conditions construct recursive bijection between objects find rooted trees cardinality @xmath60 research supported basic science research program national research foundation korea funded ministry education science technology 2011 - 0008683 2012r1a1a1014154 | 0.350199 | 2,573 | 1,461 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,959 | the apparent unification of gauge couplings around 10@xmath0 @xmath1 is one of the strong arguments in favor of supersymmetric extensions of the standard model ( sm ) . in this contribution
two new analyses of the gauge coupling running , the latter using in contrast to previous studies not data at the z peak but at lep2 energies , are presented .
the generic susy scale in the more precise novel approach is @xmath2 , easily within lhc , and possibly even within tevatron reach .
address = physics department , university of florida , p.o .
box 118440 , gainesville , fl 32611 , usa | in this paper we address the hot topic of the possible scale at which supersymmetry could manifest itself by performing indirect analyses based on the running of gauge couplings in two ways : * first a - by now `` traditional '' - analysis of gauge coupling unification in a grand unification theory , using the latest experimental inputs , mainly at the z peak scale , combined with a detailed statistical approach * a novel analysis , including for the first time high precision data collected at lep2 , which can shed light on the actual running of couplings from the z peak to @xmath3 207 @xmath1 . in the first approach in contrast to the sm the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) leads to a single unification scale of a grand unified theory ( gut ) , if we let the couplings run accordingly .
the relevant parameters are : @xmath4 - a single generic susy scale where the spectrum of supersymmetric particles starts to play a role , and @xmath5 - the scale of grand unification where the electromagnetic , weak and strong coupling come together as an unified coupling @xmath6 .
we update the analysis @xcite , using the same fitting procedure and experimental inputs except for the stong coupling where we incorporate new data .
different measurements and world averages typically fall in two groups which we will call `` high '' and `` low '' values : + @xmath7 @xcite + @xmath8 @xcite + @xmath9 @xcite + @xmath10 @xcite . the results of the fits are summarized in table 1 .
@lclll@ inputs & threshold correction & @xmath4 & @xmath5 & @xmath11 + & [ % ] & [ @xmath1 ] & [ @xmath1 ] & + + s. bethke 2004 & - 4 & @xmath13 & @xmath14 & @xmath15 + @xmath16 & - 4 & @xmath17 & @xmath18 & @xmath19 + aleph 4-jet rate & - 4 & @xmath20 & @xmath14 & @xmath21 + + @xmath22 & - 4 & @xmath23 & @xmath24 & @xmath25 + the strong coupling is a key for interpreting the results : the `` high '' @xmath26 values require an uncomfortably low susy scale @xmath27 10 @xmath1 - way below the experimental lower limit @xmath27 100 @xmath1 .
the `` low '' @xmath26 values favor values for the susy scale just above the present limits , e.g. for @xmath26 = 0.1182 we get @xmath28 at one - sided 95 % cl - well in the lhc or even tevatron direct discovery range .
we perform a new more `` direct '' analysis by adding more data .
lep2 has measured the @xmath29 cross section above the z pole @xcite with combined precision from the four experiments @xmath27 1 % and theoretical uncertainty @xmath30 0.3 % .
we fit the data computing the running of the couplings from the z peak to the highest lep2 energies in the sm or in mssm with the scale as free parameter .
all three couplings change in a different way in the two cases if the susy scale is in this mass range .
as all couplings affect the theory prediction for @xmath31 , they could give measurable effects at this level of precision .
the slight `` excess '' @xmath27 2 standard deviations is `` filled '' nicely if the couplings run as predicted in mssm .
practically all high precision points are slightly above the sm prediction as could be the case if susy starts to take over - see figure [ fig : qqfit ] .
of course a more mundane explanation , which can not be ruled out at the current level of precision and understanding , is that we have a normalization problem either on the theoretical or experimental side .
the scale is fitted to be @xmath32 precision measurements of the strong coupling @xmath33 above the z pole can provide new information .
this coupling changes the fastest in this energy range , but is also the hardest to measure .
systematic uncertainties are dominant both at lep2 ( theory and hadronization ) and cdf ( energy scale and resolution ; interplay with the gluon parton density function uncertainty at high x values ) .
as shown in figure [ fig : alfas ] the experimental precision starts to approach the effects predicted by using our best fit value for the susy scale from @xmath31 .
if the tevatron experiments benefit fully from the increased statistics in run 2 to control the systematics better and probe higher energy scales , they could possibly provide new independent evidence for the scale of supersymmetry . | paper address topic possible scale supersymmetry indirect analyses running gauge couplings two ways first traditional analysis gauge coupling unification grand unification theory using latest experimental inputs z peak scale detailed statistical approach novel analysis high precision data at lep2 running couplings from z peak to @xmath3 207 @xmath1 first approach minimal supersymmetric standard model leads to single unification scale grand unified theory gut couplings run relevant parameters are @xmath4 - single generic susy scale spectrum supersymmetric particles role @xmath5 - scale of grand unification electromagnetic weak strong coupling unified coupling @xmath6 update analysis @xcite same fitting procedure experimental inputs except stong coupling new data measurements world averages fall in two groups `` high and low '' values @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath10 results summarized in table 1 . inputs threshold correction @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath11 + % @xmath1 ]bethke 2004 - 4 @xmath13 @xmath16 - 4 @xmath17 + aleph 4-jet rate - 4 @xmath20 @xmath14 + @xmath22 - 4 @xmath23 @xmath25 + strong coupling key interpreting results high @xmath26 values require low susy scale @xmath27 10 below experimental lower limit @xmath27 100 low @xmath26 values favor susy scale above present limits @xmath26 = 0.1182 @xmath28 one - sided 95 % cl lhc tevatron direct discovery range direct analysis more data lep2 measured @xmath29 cross section above z pole combined precision four experiments @xmath27 1 % theoretical uncertainty @xmath30 0.3 % fit data couplings from z peak to highest lep2 energies sm mssm scale free parameter three couplings change different cases susy scale mass range all couplings affect theory prediction @xmath31 measurable effects precision excess @xmath27 2 standard deviations filled if couplings run as predicted mssm all high precision points slightly above sm prediction if susy starts over figure explanation normalization problem theoretical experimentalscale fitted @xmath32 precision measurements strong coupling @xmath33 above z pole provide new information coupling changes fastest energy range hardest to measure systematic uncertainties dominant at lep2 cdf gluon parton density function uncertainty high x values figure experimental precision effects best fit value susy scale from @xmath31 tevatron experiments benefit increased statistics run 2 control systematics probe higher energy scales provide new evidence scale supersymmetry | 0.180459 | 1,051 | 533 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
196,964 | new precision measurements of inclusive diffractive deep - inelastic @xmath0 scattering interactions , performed by the h1 and zeus collaborations at the hera collider , are discussed .
a new set of diffractive parton distributions , determined from recent high precision h1 data , is presented . | one of the biggest challenges in our understanding of qcd is the nature of colour singlet exchange or _ diffractive _ interactions .
the electron - proton collider hera is an ideal place to study hard diffractive processes in deep - inelastic @xmath0 scattering ( dis ) . in such interactions ,
the point - like virtual photon probes the structure of colour singlet exchange , similarly to inclusive dis probing proton structure .
l0.5 at hera , around @xmath1 of low @xmath2 events are diffractive @xcite .
experimentally , such events are identified by either tagging the elastically scattered proton in _ roman pot _
spectrometers @xmath3 downstream from the interaction point or by asking for a large rapidity gap without particle production between the central hadronic system and the proton beam direction . a diagram of diffractive dis is shown in fig . [ feyn ] .
a virtual photon coupling to the beam electron interacts diffractively with the proton through the exchange of a colour singlet and produces a hadronic system @xmath4 with mass @xmath5 in the final state .
if the 4-momenta of the incoming ( outgoing ) electron and proton are labeled @xmath6 ( @xmath7 ) and @xmath8 ( @xmath9 ) respectively , the following kinematic variables can be defined : @xmath10 , the photon virtuality ; @xmath11 , the longitudinal momentum fraction of the struck quark relative to the diffractive exchange ; @xmath12 , the fractional proton momentum taken by the diffractive exchange and @xmath13 , the 4-momentum squared transferred at the proton vertex .
bjorken - x is given by @xmath14 .
for the measurements presented here typical values of @xmath15 are @xmath16 .
@xmath17 denotes the inelasticity , where @xmath18 is the @xmath0 cms energy . a diffractive _ reduced cross section _
@xmath19 can be defined via @xmath20 which is related to the diffractive structure functions @xmath21 and the longitudinal @xmath22 by @xmath23 except at the highest @xmath24 , @xmath25 to a very good approximation .
if the outgoing proton is not detected , the measurements are integrated over @xmath26 : @xmath27 .
the proof @xcite that qcd hard scattering factorization is valid for diffractive dis justifies the expression of @xmath19 , at fixed @xmath15 and @xmath26 , as a convolution of diffractive proton parton distributions ( dpdf s ) @xmath28 and partonic cross sections @xmath29 : @xmath30 the @xmath28 should obey the dglap evolution equations and the @xmath31 are the same as for standard dis . in consequence , the framework of nlo qcd can be applied to diffractive dis in a similar way as to inclusive dis .
an extra assumption which is often made is that the @xmath32 dependence of @xmath33 can be factored out ( regge factorization ) into a _ pomeron flux factor _ @xmath34 : @xmath35 which is often parameterised using regge phenomenology as @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the pomeron trajectory with intercept @xmath38 .
the @xmath39 are _ pomeron pdfs_. although there is no firm basis in qcd for eq .
[ eq : reggefact ] , it is approximately consistent with present data .
the h1 collaboration has performed several new measurements of diffractive dis , presented in the form of the reduced cross section @xmath40 , which are summarised in fig .
[ fig : stamph1 ] . two high precision measurements in the kinematic range @xmath41 ( labeled ` h1 99 ' @xcite and ` h1 97 ' @xcite )
are based on the rapidity gap method . with respect to previous h1 data @xcite , a factor of
typically 5 more data were analysed and the kinematic range was extended significantly to lower @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
another new measurement using a forward proton spectrometer covers @xmath44 ( ` h1 99 - 00 fps ' , @xcite ) .
good agreement between the different data sets and measurement techniques is observed .
the zeus collaboration has presented new data @xcite on @xmath45 for @xmath46 , shown in fig .
[ fig : stampzeus ] .
diffractive events are selected by reconstructing a low value of @xmath5 in the detector .
the data correspond to a factor 2 increase in integrated luminosity with respect to previous results @xcite .
zeus has also measured ( fig .
[ fig : zeusloq2 ] , @xcite ) the diffractive cross section in the transition region @xmath47 between dis and quasi - real photon - proton interactions ( @xmath48 ) . also shown in fig .
[ fig : zeusloq2 ] is a fit based on a dipole model @xcite in which the photon fluctuates into @xmath49 and @xmath50 states .
both collaborations have measured the @xmath26 dependence of the cross section using their forward proton spectrometers . in the measured range @xmath52 ,
an exponential dependence @xmath53 is observed and the slope parameter @xmath54 is determined for different values of @xmath15 ( fig .
[ fig : bslopes ] ) .
models based on regge phenomenology predict an increasing steepness of the @xmath26 dependence with energy ( _ shrinkage _ ) : @xmath55 . as can be seen in fig .
[ fig : bslopes ] , the data at low @xmath15 are so far inconclusive .
zeus has studied @xcite the cross section dependence on the azimuthal angle @xmath51 between the electron and proton scattering planes , which is sensitive to the longitudinal cross section @xmath56 via the interference between transverse and longitudinal photon induced contributions , which introduces an asymmetry in @xmath51 .
the measured asymmetries are small and , within the present statistical uncertainties , compatible with zero . by making fits to the @xmath15 dependence of the diffractive dis data using eqs .
[ eq : reggefact],[eq : reggeflux ] , values for the effective pomeron intercept @xmath38 are determined .
results for measurements at different @xmath42 are shown in fig .
[ fig : alpha ] and compared with the _ soft pomeron _ value of 1.08 as well as with a parameterisation based on inclusive dis data , obtained from fits of the form @xmath57 where @xmath58 .
the diffractive data suggest an increase of @xmath38 with @xmath42 and are significantly higher than the soft pomeron value for @xmath59
. however , the naive expectation that the diffractive cross section grows twice as fast with energy as the inclusive one , corresponding to @xmath60 , is hard to reconcile with the present data at high @xmath42 .
h1 has studied @xcite the logarithmic @xmath42 dependence of the ratio of the diffractive to the inclusive dis reduced cross sections , presented as the quantity @xmath61 in fig . [
fig : ratio ] for different @xmath43 and @xmath15 values .
taking out the factorising @xmath15 dependence , the same behaviour is observed at different @xmath15 : at low @xmath43 , the logarithmic @xmath42 dependences of @xmath33 and @xmath62 are very similar , indicating that the ratio of the diffractive to the total proton gluon density is approximately constant in this region .
by contrast , at the highest @xmath63 , the logarithmic @xmath42 derivative becomes negative , suggestive of the presence of @xmath42-suppressed higher twist contributions to @xmath33 for @xmath64 .
however , this behaviour can also be explained by dglap evolution due to the the kinematic limit @xmath65 ( @xmath66 ) for gluon radiation in the case of @xmath33 .
h1 has presented @xcite a new nlo dglap qcd fit to the diffractive reduced cross section data , from which diffractive parton densities are determined .
the shape of the dpdf s is assumed to be independent of @xmath15 ( regge factorization ) , in agreement with the data , as can be seen in figs .
[ fig : betadep.flux ] and [ fig : q2dep.flux ] .
the precisely measured @xmath43 and @xmath42 dependences of the data are compared with the fit result , dividing out the @xmath15 dependence , parameterised as stated in eq .
[ eq : reggeflux ] .
the diffractive exchange is parameterised by a light flavour singlet and a gluon distribution at a starting scale @xmath67 and evolved to higher @xmath42 using the standard nlo dglap equations .
for the first time in diffraction , the experimental and model uncertainties are propagated to obtain error bands for the dpdf s .
the result of the fit is presented in fig .
[ fig : h1pdfs ] .
the diffractive pdf s remain large up to large fractional momenta @xmath68 ( or @xmath43 ) and are dominated by the gluon distribution . in total @xmath69 of the exchange momentum is carried by gluons at @xmath70 . to test factorization ,
the dpdf s can be used for updated comparisons with diffractive final state data from hera and the tevatron @xcite .
several new high precision data sets of inclusive diffractive dis have recently become available . in the case of the rapidity gap method ,
the data are now systematically limited at low @xmath42 .
these data are very useful to constrain the free parameters of qcd motivated models ( e.g. dipole models ) for diffractive dis and to distinguish between different approaches .
in particular , they have been used for the determination of a new generation of diffractive parton distributions including their uncertainties in the framework of nlo qcd , enabling tests of qcd factorization as applied to diffraction by comparisons with final state cross sections . | qcd colour singlet exchange diffractive interactions electron - proton collider hera ideal diffractive processes deep - inelastic @xmath0 scattering virtual photon probes structure colour singlet exchange proton structure hera @xmath1 low @xmath2 events are diffractive identified tagging elastically scattered proton spectrometers @xmath3 downstream interaction point or large rapidity gap without particle production between central hadronic system proton beam direction diagram of diffractive dis shown in fig . virtual photon electron interacts diffractively with proton produces hadronic system @xmath4 with mass @xmath5 final state 4-momenta electron proton labeled @xmath6 @xmath8 ) kinematic variables defined @xmath10 photon virtuality longitudinal momentum fraction struck quark diffractive exchange fractional proton momentum 4-momentum squared transferred at proton vertex bjorken - x given by @xmath14 typical values of @xmath15 are @xmath16 @xmath17 inelasticity @xmath18 @xmath0 cms energydiffractive reduced cross section @xmath19 defined via @xmath20 related to diffractive structure functions @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 if outgoing proton not detected measurements integrated over @xmath26 : @xmath27 qcd hard scattering factorization for diffractive dis justifies expression @xmath19 @xmath15 diffractive proton parton distributions @xmath28 partonic cross sections @xmath29 @xmath28 obey dglap evolution equations @xmath31 same standard dis framework nlo qcd applied to diffractive dis inclusive dis @xmath32 dependence of @xmath33 factored out into pomeron flux factor @xmath34 : @xmath35 parameterised @xmath36 @xmath37 pomeron trajectory intercept @xmath38 @xmath39 are pomeron pdfs no firm basis in qcd for eq consistent with present data collaboration performed new measurements of diffractive dis reduced cross section @xmath40 summarised in fig . high precision measurements in kinematic range @xmath41 based on rapidity gap methodprevious h1 data @xcite factor 5 more data analysed kinematic range extended to lower @xmath42 @xmath43 new measurement forward proton spectrometer covers @xmath44 99 - 00 fps agreement between data sets measurement techniques zeus collaboration presented new data @xcite on @xmath45 @xmath46 fig diffractive events selected reconstructing low value @xmath5 detector data correspond factor 2 increase integrated luminosity previous results zeus measured diffractive cross section transition region @xmath47 between dis quasi - real photon - proton interactions @xmath48 dipole model @xcite photon fluctuates into @xmath49 @xmath50 states collaborations measured @xmath26 dependence cross section forward proton spectrometers measured range @xmath52 exponential dependence @xmath53 observed slope parameter @xmath54 determined for different values @xmath15 models predict increasing steepness @xmath26 dependence with energy @xmath55 data at low @xmath15 inconclusivezeus studied cross section dependence azimuthal angle @xmath51 between electron proton scattering planes sensitive to longitudinal cross section @xmath56 interference photon contributions asymmetry in @xmath51 measured asymmetries small compatible with zero fits @xmath15 dependence diffractive dis data values effective pomeron intercept @xmath38 determined results measurements at @xmath42 shown in fig . compared with soft pomeron value 1.08 parameterisation inclusive dis data diffractive data suggest increase of @xmath38 with @xmath42 higher than soft pomeron value @xmath59 expectation diffractive cross section grows twice fast with energy inclusive hard to reconcile with data at high @xmath42 h1 studied logarithmic @xmath42 dependence ratio diffractive to inclusive dis reduced cross sections in fig . for @xmath43 @xmath15 values same behaviour observed at @xmath15 low @xmath43 logarithmic @xmath42 dependences of @xmath33 @xmath62 similar ratio diffractive to total proton gluon density constanthighest @xmath63 logarithmic @xmath42 derivative negative-suppressed higher twist contributions to @xmath33 @xmath64 explained by dglap evolution kinematic limit @xmath65 @xmath66 for gluon radiation @xmath33 presented new nlo dglap qcd fit to diffractive reduced cross section data parton densities determined shape dpdf s independent of @xmath15 factorization data figs measured @xmath43 @xmath42 dependences compared with fit result dividing @xmath15 dependence parameterised eq diffractive exchange parameterised by light flavour singlet gluon distribution starting scale @xmath67 evolved to higher @xmath42 standard nlo dglap equations experimental model uncertainties propagated error bands for dpdf s result in fig . diffractive pdf s remain large fractional momenta @xmath68 dominated by gluon distribution @xmath69 exchange momentum carried by gluons at @xmath70 dpdf s used for comparisons with diffractive final state data from hera tevatron @xcite new high precision data sets inclusive diffractive dis availablerapidity gap method data limited at low @xmath42 data useful constrain free parameters qcd motivated models for diffractive dis distinguish approaches used for new generation diffractive parton distributions including uncertainties nlo qcd enabling tests qcd factorization diffraction comparisons final state cross sections | 0.348177 | 2,238 | 1,156 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,983 | la procdure de plongement stochastique , dfinie dans @xcite , permet dassocier lquation deuler - lagrange classique ( el ) une quation deuler - lagrange stochastique ( els ) .
cette dernire est - elle sous - tendue par un principe de moindre action gnralis ?
pour aborder cette question , nous dveloppons un calcul des variations stochastique , initi par yasue @xcite .
on donne un analogue stochastique naturel @xmath0 de la fonctionnelle lagrangienne daction .
on introduit une notion de stationnarit pour laquelle les solutions de ( els ) sont les points stationnaires de @xmath0 .
la notion de stationnarit ainsi dfinie rend cohrent le calcul des variations stochastique vis - - vis de la procdure de plongement stochastique .
enfin , nous dmontrons un thorme de noether stochastique qui suggre dintroduire une nouvelle notion , celle dintgrale premire stochastique .
_ pour citer cet article : a. nom1 , a. nom2 , c. r. acad .
sci .
paris , ser .
i 340 ( 2005 ) . _ 0.5 * abstract * 0.5*coherence lemma and stochastic noether theorem . * the stochastic embedding procedure defined in @xcite associates a stochastic euler - lagrange equation ( sel ) to the standard euler - lagrange equation ( el ) .
can we derive ( sel ) from a generalized least action principle ? to address this question , we develop a stochastic calculus of variation initiated by yasue @xcite . we give a stochastic analog @xmath0 of the lagrangian action functional .
we introduce a notion of stationarity according to which the solutions of ( sel ) are the stationary points of @xmath0 .
this notion of stationarity brings coherence to stochastic calculus of variation with respect to stochastic embedding . finally , we prove a stochastic noether theorem which introduces an original notion of stochastic first integral . _ to cite this article : a. nom1 , a. nom2 , c. r. acad .
sci .
paris , ser .
i 340 ( 2005 ) . _ probability theory / dynamical systems , | on note @xmath1a , b[$ ] o @xmath2 et @xmath3 $ ] ladhrence de @xmath4 dans @xmath5 .
soit @xmath6 un corps et @xmath7 . on se donne un espace probabilis @xmath8 sur lequel existent une
famille croissante de tribus @xmath9 et une famille dcroissante de tribus @xmath10 . on note @xmath11 lensemble des processus @xmath12 dfinis sur @xmath13 , valeurs dans @xmath14 et tels que : @xmath12 soit @xmath15 et @xmath16 adapt , pour tout @xmath17 @xmath18 , lapplication @xmath19 de @xmath20 dans @xmath21 est continue , pour tout @xmath22 les quantits @xmath23 $ ] , et @xmath24 $ ] , existent dans @xmath21 ,
et enfin les applications @xmath25 et @xmath26 sont continues de @xmath4 dans @xmath21 .
+ le complt de @xmath27 pour la norme @xmath28 , est encore not @xmath11 , et simplement @xmath29 quand @xmath30 . on note @xmath31 la
drive stochastique introduite dans @xcite et dfinie par @xmath32 . on dira
quun lagrangien @xmath33 est admissible si la fonction @xmath34 est dfinie sur @xmath35 , @xmath36 en @xmath37 et holomorphe en @xmath38 , et est relle quand @xmath38 est rel .
@xmath33 est dit naturel sil scrit @xmath39 o @xmath40 est une forme quadratique sur @xmath41 et @xmath42 un potentiel de classe @xmath43 sur @xmath44 .
soit alors la fonctionnelle associe @xmath33 dfinie par @xmath45 , @xmath46 $ ] avec @xmath47 des processus @xmath33-adapt @xmath48 .
soit @xmath49 un sous espace de @xmath29 . on appelle
@xmath50variation dun processus @xmath51 , un processus de la forme @xmath52 o @xmath53 .
soit @xmath54 le sous - espace vectoriel de @xmath49 dfini par @xmath55 , et @xmath56 le sous - espace vectoriel @xmath57 .
posons alors la si @xmath33 est un lagrangien admissible et @xmath58 la fonctionnelle associe , @xmath58 est dite @xmath49-diffrentiable en un processus @xmath59 si pour tout @xmath60 , @xmath61 , o @xmath62 est une fonctionnelle linaire en @xmath63 et @xmath64 .
de plus @xmath12 est dit @xmath50stationnaire si pour tout @xmath60 , @xmath65 .
on considre le cas @xmath66 .
la @xmath56-diffrentielle de @xmath58 est donne par : soit @xmath33 un lagrangien admissible do nt toutes les diffrentielles secondes sont bornes .
posons @xmath67 $ ] .
alors @xmath68 et la fonctionnelle @xmath58 associe @xmath33 est @xmath69-diffrentiable en tout processus @xmath70 , et pour tout @xmath71 , sa diffrentielle scrit : + @xmath72 + g(z,\partial_v l)(b)-g(z,\partial_v l)(a)$ ] .
* dmonstration . *
laide du dveloppement de taylor de @xmath33 , on a @xmath73 o @xmath74 .
daprs lingalit de cauchy - schwarz , @xmath75 $ ] , @xmath76 $ ] et @xmath77 $ ] sont des @xmath78 car @xmath79 .
de plus @xmath80 , @xmath81 et @xmath82 sont bornes et @xmath70 . on en dduit que @xmath68 et @xmath83+o(\|z\|)$ ] .
on conclut en utilisant ( [ formule2 ] ) et le fait que @xmath84 .
@xmath85 rappelons les lemmes suivants respectivement dmontrs dans @xcite p.42 et @xcite p.70 , le premier gnralisant la `` loi produit '' donne par nelson dans @xcite p.@xmath86 , le deuxime tant lanalogue stochastique du lemme classique des `` fonctions plateaux '' ( _ cf _ @xcite p.@xmath87 ) : [ formule2 ] soit @xmath88 .
alors @xmath89 = \frac{d}{dt}e[x_t\cdot y_t]$ ] .
soit @xmath90 .
si pour tout @xmath84 @xmath91du=0 $ ] , alors @xmath92 est constant . des trois lemmes on dduit le une condition ncessaire et suffisante pour quun processus @xmath93 soit un processus @xmath94stationnaire pour @xmath58
est quil vrifie lquation deuler - langrange stochastique @xmath95 : @xmath96 sur @xmath20 .
le calcul des variations stochastiques est dvelopp ici indpendemment de la procdure de plongement stochastique dfinie dans @xcite .
il devient cohrent avec cette dernire pour un choix adquat de lespace de variation , en ce sens que : le diagramme suivant commute : @xmath97_{\bigstar } \ar[r]^{\cal{s } } & l(x_t,\mathcal{d}x_t ) \ar[d]^ { \maltese } \\ & ( el ) \ar[r]_{\cal{s } } & ( els ) } \end{aligned}\ ] ] o @xmath98 symbolise lutilisation du principe de moindre action classique partir de la fonctionnelle + @xmath99 , @xmath100 celle du @xmath101-principe de moindre action stochastique partir de @xmath102 $ ] et @xmath103 la procdure de plongement stochastique dfinie dans @xcite .
dans @xcite chap.@xmath104 , on traite le cas @xmath105 et on montre quune condition ncessaire et suffisante pour quun processus @xmath93 soit un processus @xmath106stationaire pour @xmath58
est quil vrifie lquation : @xmath107 sur @xmath20 .
ce cas ne nous permet pas dobtenir un lemme de cohrence mais un thorme de noether stochastique .
les symtries apparaissant dans certains systmes lagrangiens induisent lexistence dintgrales premires du mouvement ( _ cf _ @xcite p.@xmath108 ) .
une question naturelle est alors dtudier la persistance de ces objets fondamentaux sur le systme stochastis par la procdure de plongement .
introduisons lensemble @xmath109 des processus dfinis sur @xmath13 et lespace @xmath110 do nt la dfinition est donne dans @xcite p.@xmath111 . on montre suivant @xcite que lon peut calculer les drives @xmath112 et @xmath113 sur des lments de cet espace ( _ cf _
@xcite p.@xmath114 ) .
on rappelle le soit @xmath121 un diffomorphisme .
la suspension stochastique de @xmath122 est lapplication @xmath123 dfinie par @xmath124 .
dans la suite on notera indiffremment le diffomorphisme et sa suspension .
+ de plus un groupe un paramtre de transformations @xmath125 , @xmath126 , o @xmath127 , est appel un groupe @xmath122-suspendu agissant sur @xmath128 sil existe un groupe un paramtre
de diffomorphisme @xmath129 , @xmath126 , tel que pour tout @xmath126 , @xmath130 soit une suspension stochastique de @xmath131 , et pour tout @xmath132 , @xmath133 .
un groupe un paramtre de diffomorphismes est dit admissible si @xmath134 est un groupe un paramtre de @xmath135-diffeomorphismes sur @xmath44 tel que @xmath136 et tel
que la formule ( [ deriv_fonc ] ) reste vrai pour toute fonction @xmath131 du groupe .
la dernire condition peut paratre trs restrictive , mais elle est vrifie pour les groupes un paramtre de diffomorphismes affines de @xmath44 , ce qui est important dans le cas classique ( @xcite p.@xmath137 ) .
[ tecnicnoether ] soit @xmath138 une suspension stochastique dun groupe admissible un paramtre de diffomorphismes .
alors pour tout @xmath139 , et pour tout @xmath140 lapplication @xmath141 est de classe @xmath36 @xmath142 et @xmath143=\mathcal{d } \left [ \partial_s \phi_s(x)\right]$ ] @xmath142 .
soit @xmath144 ne suspension stochastique dun groupe admissible un paramtre de diffomorphismes et @xmath145 .
la fonctionnelle @xmath33 est invariante sous @xmath146 si pour tout @xmath147 et @xmath51 , @xmath148 .
[ noether ] soit @xmath58 la fonctionnelle dfinie sur @xmath149 par @xmath150 $ ] , o @xmath33 est un lagrangien admissible invariant sous le groupe admissible un paramtre de diffomorphisme @xmath138 .
soit @xmath151 un point @xmath29-stationnaire de @xmath58 . on pose @xmath152 .
alors @xmath153=0 $ ] . *
dmonstration . * on pose @xmath154 .
comme @xmath33 est invariant
sous @xmath155 , on a @xmath156 comme pour tout @xmath17 et tout @xmath157 , @xmath158 et @xmath159 , on obtient @xmath160 . en utilisant le lemme ( [ tecnicnoether ] ) , cette quation est quivalente @xmath161 .
comme @xmath162 est un @xmath106point stationaire de @xmath58 , on a @xmath163 $ ] . on en dduit alors @xmath164 \cdot { \partial y_t \over
\partial s}(0 ) + \partial_v l(v_t(0 ) ) \cdot { \cal d } \left ( { \partial y_t \over \partial s}(0)\right ) = 0 \quad ( p.s.)$ ] .
do @xmath165 \cdot { \partial y
\over \partial s}(0 ) + \partial_v l(v_t(0 ) ) \cdot { \cal d } \left ( { \partial y_t \over \partial s}(0)\right ) \right ] = 0 $ ] . + avec le lemme ( [ formule2 ] ) , il vient @xmath166 = 0 $ ] .
@xmath85 soit @xmath33 un lagrangien admissible .
une fonctionnelle @xmath167 est une intgrale premire pour lquation d euler - lagrange stochastise associe @xmath33 si @xmath168 = 0,$ ] pour tout @xmath12 satisfaisant une quation deuler - lagrange stochastique
. 7 arnold v.i .
, _ mathematical methods of classical mechanics _ , 2d edition , springer , 1989 .
cresson j. , darses s. , stochastic embedding of dynamical systems , arxiv : math.pr/0509713 , 112.p , 2005 .
cresson j. , darses s. , plongement stochastique des systmes lagangiens , 4.p , 2005 .
nelson e. , _ dynamical theories of brownian motion _ , second edition , princeton , 2001 .
thieullen m. , second order stochastic differential equations and non - gaussian reciprocal diffusions , proba .
theory and rel .
fields 97 , 231 - 257 ( 1993 ) .
yasue k , stochastic calculus of variations , journal of functional analysis 41 , 327 - 340 ( 1981 ) . | note @xmath1a @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 corps @xmath7 espace probabilis @xmath8 famille croissante tribus @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 processus @xmath12 @xmath13 valeurs @xmath14 @xmath12 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 continue @xmath22 quantits @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath21 applications @xmath25 @xmath26 continues @xmath4 @xmath21 complt @xmath27 norme @xmath28 @xmath11 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 drive stochastique dfinie @xmath32 lagrangien @xmath33 admissible fonction @xmath34 dfinie @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 holomorphe @xmath38 relle @xmath38 rel @xmath33 naturel @xmath39 @xmath40 forme quadratique @xmath41 @xmath42 potentiel classe @xmath43 @xmath44 fonctionnelle associe @xmath33 @xmath46 @xmath47 processus @xmath33-adapt @xmath48 @xmath49 sous espace @xmath29@xmath50variation processus @xmath51 processus forme @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 sous - espace vectoriel @xmath49 @xmath55 @xmath56 sous - espace @xmath57 @xmath33 lagrangien admissible @xmath58 fonctionnelle associe @xmath58 @xmath49-diffrentiable processus @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 fonctionnelle linaire @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath12 @xmath50stationnaire @xmath60 @xmath65 cas @xmath66 @xmath56-diffrentielle @xmath58 @xmath33 lagrangien admissible diffrentielles secondes bornes @xmath67 $ @xmath68 fonctionnelle @xmath58 associe @xmath33 @xmath69-diffrentiable processus @xmath70 @xmath71 diffrentielle @xmath72 + g\partial_v @xmath33 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 bornes @xmath70 @xmath68 @xmath83+o(|z)$ ]conclut utilisant formule2 ] @xmath84 @xmath85 lemmes @xcite p.42 p.70 premier loi produit '' nelson @xcite@xmath86 deuxime lanalogue stochastique lemme classique fonctions plateaux @xcite p.@xmath87 formule2 @xmath88 @xmath89 = \frac{d}{dt}e[x_t y_t]$ @xmath90 @xmath84 @xmath91du=0 $ @xmath92 constant trois condition ncessaire processus @xmath93 processus @xmath94stationnaire @xmath58 lquation - langrange stochastique @xmath95 @xmath96 sur @xmath20 calcul variations stochastiques indpendemment procdure plongement stochastique @xcite cohrent choix lespace variation diagramme commute @xmath97_{\bigstar } \ar[r]^{\cal{s }\mathcal{d}x_t ) [d]\maltese{aligned @xmath98 symbolise principe moindre action classique fonctionnelle @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101-principe moindre action stochastique @xmath102 @xmath103 procdure plongement stochastique dfinie dans @xcite chap.@xmath104 traite cas @xmath105 montre condition processus @xmath93 processus @xmath106stationaire @xmath58 vrifie lquation @xmath107 sur @xmath20 cas permet lemme cohrence thorme noether stochastique symtries systmes lagrangiens induisent dintgrales mouvement @xcite.@xmath108 dtudier persistance objets fondamentaux systme stochastis procdure plongement introduisons @xmath109 processus @xmath13 @xmath110 dfinition @xcite p.@xmath111 calculer drives @xmath112 @xmath113 lments espace@xmath114 rappelle @xmath121 diffomorphisme suspension stochastique @xmath122 @xmath123 dfinie par @xmath124 suite notera diffomorphisme suspension groupe paramtre transformations @xmath125 @xmath126 @xmath127 groupe @xmath122-suspendu sur @xmath128 groupe paramtre diffomorphisme @xmath129 @xmath126 @xmath126 @xmath130 suspension stochastique @xmath131 @xmath132 @xmath133groupe paramtre diffomorphismes admissible si @xmath134 @xmath135-diffeomorphismes sur @xmath44 @xmath136 formule_fonc vrai fonction @xmath131 condition restrictive groupes paramtre diffomorphismes @xmath44 important cas classique@xmath137 @xmath138 suspension stochastique groupe admissible paramtre diffomorphismes @xmath139 @xmath140 @xmath141 classe @xmath36 @xmath142 @xmath143=\mathcal @xmath142 @xmath144 suspension stochastique groupe admissible paramtre diffomorphismes @xmath145 fonctionnelle @xmath33 invariante sous @xmath146 @xmath147 @xmath51 @xmath148 @xmath58 fonctionnelle dfinie sur @xmath149 par @xmath150 @xmath33 lagrangien admissible invariant sous groupe paramtre diffomorphisme @xmath138 @xmath151 point @xmath29-stationnaire @xmath58 pose @xmath152 @xmath153=0 $ pose @xmath154 @xmath33 invariant sous @xmath155 @xmath156 @xmath17 @xmath157 obtient @xmath160utilisant lemme tecnicnoether quation quivalente @xmath161 @xmath162 @xmath106point stationaire @xmath58 a @xmath163 $ dduit @xmath164 \cdot \partial y_t\over s}(0 ) +_v l(0 = 0 $ @xmath165 \partial y s}(0 ) +_v l(0 = 0 $ lemme formule2 @xmath166 = 0 $ @xmath85 @xmath33 lagrangien admissible fonctionnelle @xmath167 intgrale premire lquation euler - lagrange associe @xmath33 @xmath168 = 0,$ @xmath12 satisfaisant quation deuler - lagrange stochastique arnold v mathematical methods of classical mechanics 2d edition springer 1989 cresson darses s stochastic embedding of dynamical systems 2005 plongement stochastique systmes lagangiens 2005 nelson e. dynamical theories of brownian motion second edition princeton 2001 thieullen mstochastic differential equations non - gaussian diffusions theory 97 231 - 257 1993 yasue stochastic calculus variations functional analysis 41 327 340 1981 | 0.430789 | 2,883 | 1,654 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,991 | we study correlations on the euclidean spacetimes generated in monte carlo simulations of the model . in the elongated phase , curvature correlations appear to fall off like a fractional power . near the transition to the crumpled phase this power is consistent with 4 .
we also present improved data of our computations of the binding energy of test particles . | the canonical partition function of the dynamical triangulation model is defined as a sum over simplicial manifolds consisting of equilateral four - simplices glued together according to triangulations @xmath0 , @xmath1 here @xmath2 is the number of triangles in the simplicial manifold consisting of @xmath3 four - simplices and the topology is chosen to be that of @xmath4 .
( for more details see @xcite . )
we recall that the system has two phases , a crumpled phase at low @xmath5 and an elongated phase at high @xmath5 .
the model is supposed to represent the quantum gravitational path integral over euclidean spacetimes weighted with the regge - einstein action , with volume @xmath6 and bare newton constant @xmath7 . as such it should be able to reproduce semiclassical einstein gravity as an effective theory .
this can presumably be investigated using coordinate invariant correlation functions .
another test is to see if scalar test particles form bound states , with appropriate binding energies under nonrelativistic conditions . in @xcite
we reported on such preliminary binding energy calculations .
more insight was needed at that time about the spacetimes described by the model . for a semiclassical interpretation in terms of an effective action it is obviously important if there is in some sense a background spacetime which resembles the classical @xmath4 . to address this question we studied @xcite the number of simplices at geodesic distance @xmath8 , @xmath9 .
we found encouraging scaling of this function in a region around the transition between the crumpled and elongated phase .
( for a different scaling analysis see @xcite . ) at the transition we observed that @xmath9 behaves approximately like a four - sphere , @xmath10 $ ] , for distances @xmath8 outside a short distance ` planckian regime ' up to intermediate distances of order @xmath11 . for larger distances fluctuations
distort the shape of @xmath9 .
this suggests that we focus our attention on this intermediate distance regime for a possible semiclassical interpretation of the data .
let @xmath12 denote the number of four - simplices winding around a triangle @xmath13 ( often called a ` hinge ' ) .
we measured correlations @xcite @xmath14 ^ 2 , \label{e1}\ ] ] where the brackets denote the average over simplicial configurations , @xmath15 with @xmath16 , @xmath12 , and similar for @xmath17 . here
@xmath18 is a ` triangle geodesic distance ' between @xmath13 and @xmath19 .
the ` disconnected part ' subtracted in ( [ e1 ] ) has the form of a correlation of the observable @xmath20 with the distance to a point @xmath19 , @xmath18 , which is itself a function of the geometry .
this at first sight unfamiliar form is needed for the correlation to vanish at larger distances .
other expressions for similar correlations are conceivable .
for example , including a volume element @xmath21 with a summation over @xmath13 may appear more natural from the regge calculus point of view .
we shall argue below that this leads to the same scaling results .
taking the average @xmath22 separately in numerator and denominator is another option , which should not make significant difference for not too large distances , because of the self - averaging effect of the summations in ( [ e2 ] ) . in regge calculus @xmath23
is related to the scalar curvature @xmath24 , and @xmath12 to a local volume element at @xmath13 ; we write therefore @xmath25 ( @xmath26 ) for @xmath27 ( @xmath28 ) .
however , generally , in a scaling region , a lattice operator is expected to reduce to a combination of various continuum operators , weighted with powers of the lattice distance according to their dimensions .
assuming that the theory can be described by a continuum metric tensor @xmath29 with corresponding curvature @xmath30 , the dominant continuum observable corresponding to both our lattice correlation functions @xmath25 and @xmath26 would be given by @xmath31@xmath32 ^ 2.\ ] ] here @xmath33 is the geodesic distance between the points @xmath13 and @xmath19 for a given metric @xmath29 , and the average over geometries is supposed to be calculable in semiclassical fashion .
of course , we do not know the effective action specifying this average
. it could be a combination of @xmath34 and higher order terms like @xmath35 .
[ f1 ] shows the two terms in eq .
( [ e1 ] ) separately for @xmath36 for @xmath37 and @xmath38 ( crumpled phase ) , 1.22 ( transition ) and 1.50 ( elongated phase ) .
the two contributions are very similar and fig .
[ f2 ] shows their difference , @xmath36 , which drops to zero before finite size effects take over .
[ f3 ] shows @xmath36 for a system of @xmath39 simplices and @xmath40 , which is at the transition between crumpled and elongated phase . for this case , with the employed definition of geodesic distance @xcite , the ` planckian regime ' mentioned in the introduction is @xmath41 , while @xmath42 .
so the approximate @xmath4 background geometry is to be found in the region @xmath43 .
we see an approximate power behavior @xmath44 for @xmath45 .
a fit in the range @xmath46 gives @xmath47 , @xmath48 .
the plot for @xmath26 looks similar and leads to a compatible power @xmath49 , with @xmath50 .
the equality of the powers supports the argument given above that @xmath25 and @xmath26 are dominated by the same operators in the scaling region .
the power law behavior of the data may be expected for a flat spacetime background , with @xmath51 or @xmath52 for one- or two - graviton exange .
the approximate @xmath4 interpretation of the spacetimes near the transition implies finite size corrections to the power law . an @xmath4 background curvature
@xmath53 would also allow a behavior @xmath54 , by dimensional reasoning .
we measured @xmath55 also in the elongated phase at @xmath56 , where the system is known to behave like a branched polymer with effective dimension @xmath57 .
[ f4 ] shows , a power law looks better in this phase and a fit in the region @xmath58 leads to @xmath59 for @xmath25 and @xmath60 for @xmath26 .
perhaps this can be interpreted in an effective conformal mode theory @xcite . in the crumpled phase
the correlation data are difficult to analyse because the distances are rather short in this phase .
we draw the optimistic conclusion from the power behavior that the correlation functions indicate the presence of massless excitations .
the behaviour of test particles in the spacetimes generated with the dynamical triangulation model is another interesting subject .
test particles have no backreaction on the geometry and a calculation of their attraction due to fluctuations is analogous to the quenched or valence approximation in lattice qcd .
let @xmath61 be a scalar field propagator on a given simplicial manifold , @xmath62 , where now @xmath63 denote the points on the dual lattice and @xmath64 is the corresponding lattice laplacian .
we measured @xmath65 ^ 2 \rangle,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath18 is the ( dual lattice ) geodesic distance between four - simplices . on a flat background
one would expect the behavior @xmath66 , @xmath67 at large distances , with @xmath68 the ( renormalized ) mass of the scalar particle and @xmath69 the mass of a two - particle state ( in the quenched approximation ) .
this is a bound state if @xmath70 , with binding energy @xmath71 .
[ f5 ] shows @xmath72 and @xmath73 for @xmath39 at the transition , @xmath40 , for several values of the bare mass , @xmath74 , 0.316 , 0.1 , 0.0316 .
the approximate @xmath4 behavior mentioned in the introduction is now found in the region @xmath75 , with the distance definition emplyed here .
we see roughly exponential behavior suggesting that the @xmath4 character of the background geometry can in a first approximation be neglected , similar to the correlation functions above .
the corresponding renormalized masses are @xmath76 , 0.57 , 0.27 , 0.14 .
the ratio @xmath77 appears to increase substantially as @xmath78 gets smaller .
if the model describes semiclassical gravity we may expect hydrogen atom like behavior in a nonrelativistic situation , with small fine structure constant @xmath79 : @xmath80 in this way we may be able to define the renormalized newton constant @xmath81 . to get a rudimentary feeling for the corrections to ( [ e3 ] ) the hamiltonian @xmath82 may be useful .
replacing @xmath83 and minimizing the energy leads to @xmath84 , which suggests that @xmath85 has to be considered ` large ' .
clearly , there is no indication of nonrelativistic @xmath87 behavior .
to judge the situation we have to make sure that @xmath88 is not too large ( assuming @xmath81 exists in the model ) , or @xmath68 too small for neglecting finite size @xmath4 corrections , or both .
it is also desirable to get a semiclassical understanding of the quenched approximation .
finally , we may have to take into consideration that the euclidean effective action at intermediate distances ( neglecting higher order terms like @xmath35 ) is unbounded .
9 s. catterall , these proceedings . b.v .
de bakker and j. smit , nucl .
b. ( proc . suppl . ) 34 ( 1994 ) 739 .
de bakker and j. smit , nucl .
b439 ( 1995 ) 239 . j. ambjrn and j. jurkiewicz , _ scaling in four dimensional quantum gravity _ , nbi - he-95 - 05 .
de bakker and j. smit , _ two - point functions in 4d dynamical triangulation _ ,
itfa-95 - 1 , to be published in nucl . phys .
b. i. antoniadis and e. mottola , phys .
d45 ( 1992 ) 2013 . | canonical partition function dynamical triangulation model sum over simplicial manifolds equilateral four - simplices glued together triangulations @xmath0 @xmath2 is number of triangles in manifold @xmath3 simplices topology @xmath4 see @xcite system has two phases crumpled at low @xmath5 elongated at high @xmath5 model quantum gravitational path integral over euclidean spacetimes weighted with regge - einstein action volume @xmath6 bare newton constant @xmath7 should reproduce semiclassical einstein gravity investigated using coordinate invariant correlation functions test scalar test particles form bound states binding energies under nonrelativistic conditions reported preliminary binding energy calculations more insight needed about spacetimes model interpretation important background spacetime resembles classical @xmath4 studied number of simplices at geodesic distance @xmath8 @xmath9 encouraging scaling around transition between crumpled elongated phase see @xcite transition @xmath9 behaves like four - sphere for distances outside intermediate distances larger distances fluctuations distort shape of @xmath9suggests focus intermediate distance regime for semiclassical interpretation data @xmath12 four - simplices around triangle @xmath13 hinge measured correlations @xmath14 brackets average over simplicial configurations @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath12 @xmath17 @xmath18 triangle geodesic distance between @xmath13 @xmath19 disconnected part subtracted e1 ] correlation observable @xmath20 with distance to point @xmath19 @xmath18 function of geometry form needed correlation vanish at larger distances other expressions correlations conceivable including volume element @xmath21 with summation over @xmath13 natural regge calculus leads to same scaling results average @xmath22 separately option not significant difference for large distances self - averaging effect summations regge calculus @xmath23 related to scalar curvature @xmath24 @xmath12 to local volume element at @xmath13 write @xmath25 ( @xmath26 ) for @xmath27 ( @xmath28 ) scaling region lattice operator reduce to continuum operators weighted with powers lattice distance dimensionstheory described by continuum metric tensor @xmath29 curvature @xmath30 dominant continuum observable lattice correlation functions @xmath25 @xmath26 given by @xmath31@xmath32 @xmath33 geodesic distance between points @xmath13 @xmath19 for metric @xmath29 average calculable semiclassical effective action average combination of @xmath34 terms @xmath35 f1 shows two terms for @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 crumpled 1.22 1.50 elongated phase contributions similar f2 shows difference @xmath36 drops to zero before finite size effects f3 shows @xmath36 system of @xmath39 @xmath40 transition between crumpled elongated phase geodesic distance planckian regime is @xmath41 @xmath42 approximate @xmath4 background geometry in region @xmath43 approximate power behavior @xmath44 for @xmath45 fit in range @xmath46 gives @xmath47 @xmath48 plot for @xmath26 compatible power @xmath49 @xmath50 equality powers supports argument @xmath25 @xmath26 dominated by same operators in scaling regionpower law behavior expected flat spacetime background @xmath51 or @xmath52 one- or two - graviton exange @xmath4 interpretation transition implies finite size corrections power law @xmath4 background curvature @xmath53 behavior @xmath54 dimensional reasoning measured @xmath55 elongated phase @xmath56 branched polymer dimension @xmath57 power law better phase fit region @xmath58 leads to @xmath59 @xmath25 @xmath60 @xmath26 interpreted effective conformal mode theory crumpled phase correlation data difficult analyse distances short optimistic conclusion correlation functions indicate massless excitations behaviour test particles spacetimes dynamical triangulation model test particles no backreaction geometry calculation attraction fluctuations analogous quenched valence approximation lattice qcd @xmath61 scalar field propagator simplicial manifold @xmath62 @xmath63 points dual lattice @xmath64 lattice laplacian measured @xmath65 @xmath18 dual lattice geodesic distance between four - simplices flat background behavior @xmath66 @xmath67 large distances @xmath68 mass scalar particle @xmath69 mass two - particle statebound state @xmath70 binding energy @xmath71 f5 ] shows @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath39 transition @xmath40 values bare mass @xmath74 0.316 0.1 0.0316 approximate @xmath4 behavior region @xmath75 distance definition exponential behavior @xmath4 character background geometry neglected correlation functions renormalized masses @xmath76 0.57 0.27 0.14 ratio @xmath77 @xmath78 smaller model describes semiclassical gravity hydrogen atom behavior nonrelativistic situation small fine structure constant @xmath79 : @xmath80 define renormalized newton constant @xmath81 feeling corrections hamiltonian @xmath82 useful replacing @xmath83 minimizing energy leads @xmath84 @xmath85 considered large ' no indication nonrelativistic @xmath87 behavior @xmath88 not too large @xmath68 small neglecting finite size @xmath4 corrections desirable semiclassical understanding quenched approximation euclidean effective action intermediate distances neglecting higher order terms @xmath35 unbounded 9 s. catterall proceedings b.v . de bakker j.smit nucl 34 1994 ) 739 bakker smit b439 1995 ) 239 ambjrn jurkiewicz scaling four dimensional quantum gravity nbi - he-95 - 05 de bakker smit two - point functions 4d dynamical triangulation itfa-95 - 1 published antoniadis mottola d45 1992 2013 | 0.352006 | 2,340 | 1,257 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
196,994 | we present a study of @xmath0 lepton pair production in pb + pb collisions at @xmath1 = 5.5 tev . the larger mass of tau lepton compared to electron and muon leads to considerably small hadronic contribution to the @xmath0 pair invariant mass ( m ) distribution relative to the production from thermal partonic sources .
the quark anti - quark annihilation processes via intermediary virtual photon , z and higgs bosons have been considered for the tau lepton production . the contribution from drell yan process
is found to dominate over thermal yield for @xmath0 pair mass from 4 to 20 gev at the lhc energy .
we also present the ratio of @xmath2 lepton pair yields for nucleus nucleus collisions relative to yields from p + p collisions scaled by number of binary collisions at lhc energies as a function @xmath2 lepton pair inavariant mass .
the ratio is found to be significantly above unity for the mass range 4 to 6 gev .
this indicates the possibility of detecting @xmath0 pair from quark
gluon plasma ( qgp ) in the mass window 4 to 6 gev .
* heavy dilepton in nucleus nucleus collision at lhc energy * + * sarbani majumder@xmath3 * + @xmath3department of physics , bose institute , kolkata , india | the heavy dilepton pairs namely @xmath4 created in pb - pb collision at lhc energy is discussed in this work .
the major advantage of looking at @xmath4 dilepton pair arises due to the mass of the @xmath2 ( @xmath5 1.77 gev ) .
the @xmath2 pair mass distribution would then start beyond known contribution of hadronic resonances ( @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 ) which dominates in the respective mass regions in @xmath9 and @xmath10 sector .
this would in turn mean the remaining contribution for @xmath2 production are due to thermal sources from partonic medium , pion annihilation in hadronic medium and drell yan mechanism .
we think that the results will definitely provide some useful baseline for experimental search and further detailed studies .
the main source of heavy dilepton @xmath11 pair production we have considered in this work is quark and anti - quark annihilation through photon , z and higgs bosons intermediated process .
the corresponding feynman diagrams are shown in fig .
they all contribute to thermal production of @xmath11 pair in quark gluon plasma .
the productions for these processes are evaluated from the matrix elements indicated below .
the matrix element for the process @xmath12 is given by , @xmath13[\bar{u(k_1)}{\gamma_\tau}v(k_2)]\ ] ] where , @xmath14 @xmath15[{c_v}^\tau-{c_a}^\tau{\gamma_5}]\ ] ] finally putting the values of the parameters we have , @xmath16 + s(0.858m_q^2 + 1.14m_\tau^2)\nonumber\\ & & -0.59m_q^2m_\tau^2 -0.0041\frac{s m_q^2 m_\tau^2}{m_z^2}+0.002 \frac{s^2 m_q^2 m_\tau^2}{m_z^2}\big ] \label{eq.z}\end{aligned}\ ] ] similarly , for the photon mediated process we have : @xmath17+(\frac{s}{2}-m_q^2)m_\tau^2\big ] \label{eq.photon}\ ] ] @xmath18 is the average charge of quarks , e is the electronic charge .
the matrix element of the interference term is @xmath19 .
@xmath20 + 0.0912\frac{s^3}{m_z^2 } \nonumber \\ & -&0.1824\frac{m_\tau^2}{m_z^2}s^2 + 0.5472\frac{m_q^2 m_\tau^2}{m_z^2}s + 0.1824 m_q^2 s-1.09 m_q^2 m_\tau^2\big ] \label{eq.interference}\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally , the matrix element for the higgs mediated process is : @xmath21[2m_\tau^2-\frac{s}{2 } ] \label{eq.h}\ ] ] here , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , are the masses of quarks , @xmath2 leptons , @xmath26 boson and higgs respectively .
( @xmath27 , @xmath28 ) and ( @xmath29 , @xmath30 ) are initial state and final state momenta respectively .
the total production cross section ( @xmath31 ) of @xmath32 is obtained by taking a coherent sum of the matrix elements given in eqs.([eq.z ] ) , ( [ eq.photon ] ) , ( [ eq.interference ] ) and ( [ eq.h ] ) with the following values of various parameters : @xmath24=91 gev , @xmath33=1.78 gev , @xmath25=120 gev , @xmath34=0.234 @xmath35=0.5 , @xmath36=0.19 , @xmath37=-0.5 , @xmath38=-0.03 and higgs vev=246 gev .
the total production cross - section @xmath31 is folded by the parton distribution functions to obtained the @xmath2 lepton pair yield in p - p collisions . in the present work cteq5
m pdf @xcite have been taken to obtain this .
the dy production of @xmath2 lepton in pb - pb collision is ; @xmath39 where , @xmath40 is the number of binary nucleon nucleon collisions an impact parameter b calculated using glauber model and @xmath41 is the inelastic cross section for p - p interaction .
we have taken @xmath42 mb and @xmath43 fm corresponding to @xmath44 centrality at @xmath45 tev .
the shadowing of parton distribution functions has been taken from @xcite .
the space time evolution of the system formed in pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev has been studied by using ideal relativistic hydrodynamics @xcite with longitudinal boost invariance @xcite and cylindrical symmetry .
our assummption is that the system reaches equilibration at a time @xmath47 = 0.08 fm / c after the collision . the initial temperature , @xmath48 is considered to be 700 mev and is calculated assuming the hadronic multiplicity ( dn / dy ) to be of the order of 2100 @xcite .
the equation of state ( eos ) obtained from the lattice qcd calculations by the milc collaboration @xcite for the partonic phase is used here . for the hadronic phase
eos all the resonances with mass 2.5 gev have been considered @xcite .
the transition temperature ( @xmath49 ) between hadronic phase and partonic phase is taken to be 175 mev @xcite .
we consider kinetic freeze out temperature , @xmath50 = 120 mev . in this context
we want to mention that the gluon fusion process was found to be dominant for mass of lepton pair greater than the mass of w boson .
our results are concentrated in the mass range of 4 to 20 gev , where the contribution from such process is found to be orders of magnitude smaller compared to the rest of the sources of @xmath11 pair production .
[ ! htb ] lepton pair yields as a function of invariant mass of the pair is displayed for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev .
solid line indicates the spectra from quark gluon plasma and the dashed line stands for contribution from dy process . in ( b )
the ratio @xmath51 / @xmath52 $ ] is shown , here @xmath51 is the sum of the contribution shown in ( a ) , @xmath53 $ ] is the dy contribution from @xmath54 collision , and @xmath55 = 1369.477 for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev.,title="fig : " ] lepton pair yields as a function of invariant mass of the pair is displayed for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev .
solid line indicates the spectra from quark gluon plasma and the dashed line stands for contribution from dy process . in (
b ) the ratio @xmath51 / @xmath52 $ ] is shown , here @xmath51 is the sum of the contribution shown in ( a ) , @xmath53 $ ] is the dy contribution from @xmath54 collision , and @xmath55 = 1369.477 for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev.,title="fig : " ] the yield ( @xmath56 ) for @xmath2 dilepton pair as a function of @xmath32 pair invariant mass for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev is shown in figure [ fig2](a ) . the contributions from drell yan ( dy , dashed line ) and thermal partonic medium ( qgp , solid line ) are shown .
as evident from the figure , the drell yan contribution is higher than the thermal contribution for all the mass range studied .
the difference seems to increase with increase in @xmath32 pair mass .
figure [ fig2](b ) shows the ratio @xmath51 / @xmath52 $ ] , where @xmath51 is the sum of all the the contributions shown in figure [ fig2](a ) from pb+pb collisions .
the @xmath52 $ ] , is the number of binary collisions scaled contribution from dy process .
this contribution can be estimated from the measurement in p+p collisions at the same energy ( @xmath57 = 5.5 tev ) .
if there is no qgp formation then the ratio should always be equal to unity indicating the fact that the dilepton yield in the nucleus - nucleus collision is the collection of individual nucleon - nucleon collision only .
however , we observe that the ratio is above unity for the mass range of 4 to 6 gev . starting with a value of 1.4 at mass of 4 gev it decreases towards unity beyond mass of 6 gev .
this indicates that one should be able to extract a clear information of thermal contribution from partonic source at lhc energies using heavy dilepton pair measurement within the mass window of 4 to 6 gev .
a study of @xmath2 dilepton pair production at lhc energy has been carried out in this work . we have considered pb+pb collisions at midrapidity for @xmath46 = 5.5 tev .
it is expected that this energy should allow a significant production of @xmath2 leptons .
the main motivation of considering the @xmath2 lepton is its mass . because of heavy mass
the tau lepton yield is expected not to suffer from the huge background production .
the main sources for @xmath2 pair production considered here by quark and anti - quark annihilation mediated through photon , z and higgs boson .
the contribution from pion annihilation process is few orders of magnitude small compared to both thermal and drell yan contributions .
the drell yan contribution is found to be higher than the thermal contribution from partonic sources for the entire mass range studied .
the non - thermal contributions could be measured experimentally through p+p collisions , then the ratio of yields from nucleus - nucleus collisions to the yields for the binary collision scaled p+p collisions is found to be above unity for the mass range of 4 - 6 gev .
this indicates the window in mass region for @xmath2 dilepton pair where the thermal production can be studied at lhc energy using heavy dilepton pairs as an observable .
the support of prof .
jan e alam , vecc , dr .
b. mohanty , niser , prof .
sanjay k. ghosh and dr .
rajarshi ray of bose institute , kolkata is gratefully acknowledged . | heavy dilepton pairs @xmath4 pb - pb collision at lhc energy discussed advantage @xmath4 dilepton pair mass @xmath2 ( @xmath5 1.77 gev ) @xmath2 pair mass distribution beyond hadronic resonances @xmath6 mass @xmath9 @xmath10 sector remaining contribution @xmath2 production due to thermal sources from partonic medium pion annihilation hadronic medium drell yan mechanism results provide baseline for experimental search studies main source heavy dilepton @xmath11 pair production quark anti - quark annihilation through photon z higgs bosons feynman diagrams fig . contribute to thermal production @xmath11 pair in quark gluon plasma productions processes evaluated from matrix elements matrix element @xmath12 by @xmath13[\gamma_\tau @xmath14 @xmath15\gamma_5 values parameters @xmath16 + s(0.858m_q^2 + 1.14m_\tau^2) -0.59m_q^2m_\tau^2 -0.0041{aligned photon mediated process @xmath17+(\frac{s}{2}-m_q^2)m_\tau^2\big.photon @xmath18 average charge quarks e electronic charge matrix element interference term @xmath19 @xmath20 + 0.0912\frac{s^3}{m_z^2 } -&0.1824\frac{m_\tau^2}{m_z^2}s^2 + 0.5472\frac{m_q^2\tau^2 + 0.1824 m_q^2 s-1.09 m_q^2 m_\tau^2\big.interference matrix element higgs mediated process @xmath21[2m_\tau^2-\frac{s}{2 }.h @xmath22 masses quarks leptons @xmath26 boson higgs @xmath27 initial final state momenta total production cross section @xmath31 ) @xmath32 sum matrix elements eqs.([eq.z eq.photon eq.interference eq.h values parameters @xmath24=91 gev @xmath33=1.78 gev @xmath25=120 gev=0.234=0.5.19=-0.5=-0.03 higgs vev=246 gev total production cross - section @xmath31 folded parton distribution functions @xmath2 lepton pair yield p - p collisions cteq5 production @xmath2 lepton pb - pb collision @xmath39 @xmath40 binary nucleon collisions impact parameter b model @xmath41 inelastic cross section p - p interaction @xmath42 mb @xmath43 fm @xmath44 centrality @xmath45 tev shadowing parton distribution functions from @xcite space time evolution system pb+pb collisions @xmath46 = 5.5 tev studied ideal relativistic hydrodynamics longitudinal boost invariance cylindrical symmetry system reaches equilibration @xmath47 = 0.08 fm / c after collision initial temperature @xmath48 700 mev hadronic multiplicity dy 2100 equation of state lattice qcd calculations partonic phase resonances mass 2.5 gev transition temperature between hadronic partonic phase 175 mev kinetic freeze out temperature @xmath50 = 120 mevgluon fusion process dominant for mass lepton pair greater than w boson results in mass 4 to 20 gev contribution from process smaller compared to sources @xmath11 pair production lepton pair yields function of invariant mass displayed for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev solid line spectra from quark gluon plasma dashed line contribution dy process ratio @xmath51 / @xmath52 @xmath51 dy contribution = 1369.477 for pb+pb collisions @xmath46 = 5.5 tev lepton pair yields invariant mass for pb+pb collisions at = 5.5 tev solid line spectra from quark gluon plasma dashed line contribution dy process ratio @xmath51 / @xmath52 @xmath51 dy contribution @xmath55 = 1369.477 for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev yield for @xmath2 dilepton pair function of @xmath32 pair invariant mass for pb+pb collisions at @xmath46 = 5.5 tev shown in figure contributions from drell yan and thermal partonic mediumdrell yan contribution higher than thermal contribution for mass range studied difference with @xmath32 pair mass shows ratio @xmath51 / @xmath52 @xmath51 sum of contributions from pb+pb collisions @xmath52 binary collisions contribution from dy process estimated from p+p collisions at same energy @xmath57 = 5.5 tev no qgp formation ratio equal to unity dilepton yield in nucleus - collision ratio above unity for mass 4 to 6 gev decreases towards unity beyond 6 gev information thermal contribution from partonic source at lhc energies using heavy dilepton pair measurement 4 to 6 gev study of @xmath2 dilepton pair production at lhc energy carried considered pb+pb collisions at midrapidity for @xmath46 = 5.5 tev energy significant production of @xmath2 leptons motivation @xmath2 lepton mass heavy tau lepton yield not from background production main sources for @xmath2 pair production quark anti - quark annihilation photon z higgs boson contribution from pion annihilation small compared to thermal drell yan contributionsdrell yan contribution higher than thermal partonic sources mass range non - thermal contributions measured through p+p collisions ratio nucleus - nucleus binary collision p+p collisions above unity mass range 4 - 6 gev indicates window mass region @xmath2 dilepton pair thermal production lhc energy heavy dilepton pairs support prof alam dr mohanty prof sanjay ghosh dr rajarshi ray bose institute kolkata acknowledged | 0.349319 | 2,392 | 1,259 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,000 | we present a preliminary report on a calculation of scattering length for @xmath0 @xmath1-wave two - pion system directly from the two - pion wave function .
results are compared with those calculated from the time dependence of two - pion four - point functions .
calculations are made with an rg - improved action for gluons and improved wilson action for quarks at @xmath2 gev on @xmath3 and @xmath4 lattices . | by now the standard procedure employed for calculating the scattering length of hadrons from euclidean lattice qcd is to use the finite - size method proposed by lscher , which relates the finite volume shift of energy eigenvalues @xmath5 to the scattering lengths .
the formula reads @xcite @xmath6 where @xmath7 , and @xmath8 and @xmath9 are geometrical constants .
the energy shift @xmath5 is extracted from the time dependence of two - pion four - point functions . in this way
a number of calculations has been made for the @xmath0 @xmath1-wave two - pion scattering length using the staggered @xcite , the standard @xcite and the improved wilson fermion actions @xcite .
it should be noted that the condition @xmath10 is assumed for the two - pion interaction range @xmath11 and the lattice volume @xmath12 in derivation of the formula ( [ luscher.eq ] ) @xcite .
so far there have been studies of the lattice volume dependence of the scattering length , but no direct investigation of the interaction range @xmath11 .
it is extremely important that we examine the validity of the necessary condition for the lscher s formula in our current lattice simulations .
this can be done by investigating the two - pion wave functions , which is one of the purpose of this article .
similar work has been carried for 2 dimensional xy model @xcite . once one has access to the wave functions
, one can try to extract the scattering length from them .
this is the second , and perhaps more interesting , purpose of this article .
our idea is based on the derivation of the lscher s formula ( [ luscher.eq ] ) .
lscher found that the two - pion wave function @xmath13 on a finite periodic box @xmath12 satisfies the following effective schrdinger equation @xcite .
@xmath14 where @xmath15 is the relative coordinate of the two pion and @xmath16 is related to the two - pion energy eigenvalue through @xmath17 .
the function @xmath18 is the fourier transform of the modified bethe - salpeter kernel introduced in @xcite .
it is non - local and generally depends on energy . in the derivation of the formula it is assumed that @xmath19 for @xmath20 . in this region
the wave function satisfies the helmholtz equation @xmath21 .
the general solution of helmholtz equation on a finite periodic box @xmath12 can be written as @xmath22 up to over all constant , where @xmath23 . assuming the interaction range is smaller than one half of box size , _ ie .
_ @xmath10 , and expanding the general solution ( [ luscher.div_two ] ) in terms of spherical bessel @xmath24 and noeman @xmath25 functions for @xmath26 , we obtain @xmath27 where neglected terms are contributions from states with angular momentum @xmath28 .
the expansion coefficients @xmath29 and @xmath30 yield the scattering phase shift in infinite volume by @xmath31 .
in particular for the lowest energy state of the two - pion , it gives the scattering length by @xmath32 .
the constant @xmath30 are also related to @xmath29 geometrically and the relation leads to the lscher s formula ( [ luscher.eq ] ) .
= 7.2 cm in this work we define the two - pion wave function by @xmath33 where @xmath34 is an element of cubic group , and summation over @xmath34 and @xmath35 projects out the @xmath36 sector of the cubic group and that of the zero center of mass momentum . in order to enhance signals we use a source constructed with two wall sources given by @xmath37 , with @xmath38 the wall source at @xmath39 , in coulomb gauge fixed configurations .
we work in quenched lattice qcd employing an rg - improved action for gluons at @xmath40 and an improved wilson action for quarks at @xmath41 .
the corresponding lattice cutoff is estimated as @xmath42 gev from @xmath43 .
the volumes of lattices ( number of configuration ) are @xmath44 @xmath45 and @xmath46 @xmath47 which correspond to @xmath48 and @xmath49 in physical units .
quark masses are chosen to be @xmath50 , @xmath51 , and @xmath52 .
quark propagators are solved with the dirichlet boundary condition imposed in the time direction and the periodic boundary condition in the space directions .
the sources are set at @xmath53 and @xmath54 for both lattices . in figure [ fig.1.fig ]
we show the ratio of the wave function @xmath55 on a @xmath56 lattice at @xmath57 and @xmath58 . here
we choose @xmath59 for normalization point .
we find that the statistical error is very small .
figure [ fig.2.fig ] shows the ratio @xmath60 at the same parameters for several @xmath39 . this ratio should take a negative constant @xmath61 for the @xmath0 two - pion system for @xmath62 .
clear plateau appears for @xmath63 at @xmath64 as shown in the figure .
this indicates that the necessary size for application of the lscher s formula is @xmath65 ) .
we try to extract the value of @xmath16 from the wave function by fitting the data with the function defined by ( [ luscher.div_two ] ) .
the results are plotted by large cross symbols in figure [ fig.1.fig ] , where we choose @xmath66 as the fitting range .
the fit works very well . the result for @xmath16
is @xmath67 @xmath68 , which is consistent with that obtained from the time dependence of the two - pion four - point function , @xmath69 @xmath68 .
we check the consistency between the two determinations at all simulation points on @xmath56 lattice in figure [ fig.3.fig ] , where the scattering length is calculated by substituting @xmath16 to the lscher s formula ( [ luscher.eq ] ) .
we observe that the statistical error of the scattering length obtained from the wave function is smaller than that from the time correlation function .
this feature was also found for the 2 dimensional xy model @xcite . the wave function on a larger lattice of @xmath70 at @xmath71 and the results of the fitting are shown in figure [ fig.4.fig ] , where we choose @xmath57 .
we find a systematic discrepancy between the data and the fit for large @xmath72 region ( @xmath73 ) .
further there is a large discrepancy in the scattering length obtained from two methods as shown in figure [ fig.3.fig ] . a possible cause of the discrepancy is smallness of the time extent .
the strength of the two - pion interaction on a finite @xmath12 periodic box is proportional to @xmath74 .
if we consider a time - dependent effective shrdinger equation , the wave function satisfies a heat diffusion equation .
we expect that a larger time extent is necessary to obtain the correct wave function for a larger volume . in order to confirm this anticipation
, we are going to explore simulations on a temporal extent @xmath75 in our next study .
this work is supported in part by grants - in - aid of the ministry of education ( no.15740134 ) .
simulations were performed on the parallel computer pilot3 at the center for computational physics , university of tsukuba . 9 s.r .
et.al._ , nucl .
* b383 * ( 1992 ) 309 .
y. kuramashi _ et.al._ , phys .
* 71 * ( 1993 ) 2387 ; m. fukugita _ et.al._ , phys . rev .
* d52 * ( 1995 ) 3003 .
r. gupta _ et.al._ , phys . rev .
* d48 * ( 1993 ) 388 .
cp - pacs collaboration , s. aoki _ et.al._ , phys . rev . *
d67 * ( 2003 ) 014502 .
jlqcd collaboration , s. aoki _ et.al._ , phys .
* d66 * ( 2002 ) 077501 . c. liu _
et.al._ , hep - lat/0109010 ; nucl . phys .
* b624 * ( 2002 ) 360 .
m. lscher , commun .
* 105 * ( 1986 ) 153 ; nucl .
phys . * b354 * ( 1991 ) 531 .
j. balog _ et.al._ , nucl .
* b618 * ( 2001)315 . | standard procedure for calculating scattering length hadrons from euclidean lattice qcd finite - size method by lscher relates finite volume shift of energy eigenvalues @xmath5 to scattering lengths formula reads @xmath6 geometrical constants energy shift @xmath5 extracted from time dependence of two - pion four - point functions calculations for @xmath0 @xmath1-wave two - pion scattering length using staggered standard improved wilson fermion actions condition @xmath10 assumed for two - pion interaction range @xmath11 lattice volume @xmath12 formula studies of lattice volume dependence scattering length no investigation of interaction range @xmath11 important examine validity of condition for lscher s formula in current lattice simulations two - pion wave functions article similar work for 2 dimensional xy model @xcite wave functions extract scattering length idea based on derivation lscher s formula found two - pion wave function @xmath13 on finite periodic box @xmath12 satisfies schrdinger equation relative coordinate two pion related to two - pion energy eigenvalue throughfunction @xmath18 fourier transform bethe - salpeter kernel @xcite non - local depends on energy @xmath19 @xmath20 wave function satisfies helmholtz equation @xmath21 solution helmholtz equation finite box @xmath12 @xmath22 constant @xmath23 interaction range smaller half box size @xmath10 expanding solution spherical bessel @xmath24 noeman @xmath25 functions @xmath26 @xmath27 neglected terms contributions states angular momentum @xmath28 expansion coefficients @xmath29 @xmath30 yield scattering phase shift infinite volume @xmath31 lowest energy state scattering length @xmath32 constant @xmath30 related to @xmath29 geometrically relation leads to lscher s formula 7.2 cm two - pion wave function by @xmath33 @xmath34 element cubic group summation projects @xmath36 sector cubic group zero center mass momentum signals source two wall sources @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 gauge configurations quenched lattice qcd - improved action for gluons @xmath40 improved wilson action quarks @xmath41lattice cutoff estimated @xmath42 from @xmath43 volumes of lattices are @xmath44 correspond to @xmath48 @xmath49 quark masses @xmath50 @xmath52 quark propagators solved with dirichlet boundary condition time periodic boundary space directions sources set at @xmath53 @xmath54 for lattices ratio wave function @xmath55 on @xmath56 lattice at @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 for normalization point statistical error small ratio @xmath60 parameters for @xmath39 ratio negative constant @xmath61 for two - pion system @xmath62 plateau for @xmath63 @xmath64 necessary size for lscher s formula is @xmath65 extract value of @xmath16 from wave function data with function luscher.div_two results plotted symbols @xmath66 as fitting range fit works result for @xmath16 is @xmath67 @xmath68 consistent with time dependence of two - pion four - point function @xmath69 @xmath68check consistency between two determinations at simulation points on @xmath56 lattice figure fig.3.fig scattering length calculated substituting @xmath16 to lscher s formula statistical error of scattering length from wave function smaller than time correlation function feature found for 2 dimensional xy model @xcite wave function on larger lattice @xmath70 @xmath71 results fitting shown in figure fig.4.fig choose @xmath57 systematic discrepancy between data fit for large @xmath72 region ) large discrepancy in scattering length from two methods possible cause smallness time extent strength of two - pion interaction on finite @xmath12 periodic box proportional to @xmath74 wave function satisfies heat diffusion equation larger time extent necessary correct wave function for larger volume explore simulations on temporal extent @xmath75 next study work supported by grants ministry of education simulations performed on parallel computer pilot3 at center for computational physics university of tsukuba b383 1992 ) 309 kuramashi 1993 ) 2387 fukugita 1995 ) 3003 guptarev d48 1993 ) 388 cp - pacs collaboration aoki.al. d67 2003 ) 014502 jlqcd collaboration aoki phys d66 2002 ) 077501 liu et.al. hep - lat/0109010 nucl b624 2002 ) 360 lscher commun 105 1986 ) 153 nucl b354 1991 ) 531 balog et.al. nucl b618 2001)315 | 0.310836 | 1,957 | 999 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,007 | we are modeling the spectra of dwarf galaxies from infrared to submillimeter wavelengths to understand the nature of the various dust components in low - metallicity environments , which may be comparable to the ism of galaxies in their early evolutionary state .
the overall nature of the dust in these environments appears to differ from those of higher metallicity starbursting systems . here
, we present a study of one of our sample of dwarf galaxies , ngc 1569 , which is a nearby , well - studied starbursting dwarf . using isocam , iras , isophot and scuba data with the dsert et al ( 1990 ) model , we find consistency with little contribution from pahs and very small grains and a relative abundance of bigger colder grains , which dominate the fir and submillimeter wavelengths .
we are compelled to use 4 dust components , adding a very cold dust component , to reproduce the submillimetre excess of our observations . | dwarf galaxies in our local universe are ideal laboratories for studying the interplay between the ism and star formation in low - metallicity environments ( hunter & gallagher 1989 ) .
they are at relatively early epochs of their chemical evolution , possibly resembling distant protogalaxies in their early stages of star formation .
although only a few metal - poor galaxies have been observed in the mir using iso , the characteristics of the mir dust components appear to differ remarkably from those of normal - metallicity starbursts ( madden 2000 ) . whether this is an abundance or composition effect is not yet clear . for this reason
, we are studying their detailed luminosity budget by modeling their spectral energy distributions ( seds ) from optical to millimeter wavelengths , thereby constructing templates to study conditions in primordial galaxies to help to constrain galaxy evolution models .
the galaxy we present here is ngc 1569 .
it is a hi - rich , metal - poor ( @xmath0 ) dwarf irregular galaxy which lies near the galactic plane at a distance of @xmath1 ( israel 1988 ) .
ngc 1569 is presently in the aftermath of a massive burst of star formation ( israel 1988 , israel & de bruyn 1988 , waller 1991 ) and exhibits very compact hii regions and 2 super - star - clusters ( hunter et al 2000 ) .
figure [ fig : obs ] shows some of our broadband images of ngc 1569 with isocam and scuba .
the isocam 7.75 @xmath2 band traces the aromatic bands ( pah ) and the scuba band traces the cold grain continuum . [
cols="^,^ " , ] figure [ fig : cvf ] shows the isocam cvf spectrum for ngc 1569 . compared to a normal disk galaxy , there are very strong ionic lines due to o - b stars .
the ratio @xmath3/[neii ] } \sim 10 $ ] limits the age of the stellar clusters to @xmath4 5 myr .
there are weak aromatic bands , probably due to the destruction of the carriers as a consequence of the hard penetrating radiation field in the low - metallicity environement .
moreover , there s a very steeply rising continuum due to very small grains emission ( see the the dsert et al ( 1990 ) model ) which are stochastically heated .
the dsert et al ( 1990 ) model empirically computes the dust emissivity from near - infrared to submillimetre wavelengths .
it is a coherent interpretation of both the interstellar extinction and the infrared emission .
the emission originates from three different components : the pah ( polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon ) which are aromatic 2-dimensional molecules producing the fuv non - linear part of the extinction curve , the vsg ( very small grains ) which are 3-dimensional carbon grains apparently responsible for the absorption bump at 217.5 nm , the bg ( big grains ) which are 3-dimensional silicate grains explaining the nir and visible rise of the extinction curve .
each component is described by four parameters : a minimum and maximum grain size ( @xmath5 and @xmath6 ) , a power - law index , @xmath7 , for the size distribution and a scaling factor which is the mass abundance relative to hydrogen ( @xmath8 ) .
the number density of grains of radius between @xmath9 and @xmath10 is @xmath11 .
we model the sed of this galaxy , fitting the dsert et al ( 1990 ) dust model to our observations ( broadbands and spectrum ) .
we make the link between the stellar radiation field and the full dust spectrum by modeling the stellar populations with pegase ( fioc , rocca - volmerange , 1997 ) using uv to nir data from the literature and mir ionic lines as a further constraint .
we then use our modeled stellar radiation field as input to the dust model . to obtain the best @xmath12 fit ,
we vary different parameters of the model : the mass abundances ( @xmath13 ) , the minimum and maximum sizes ( @xmath5 and @xmath6 , except @xmath14 ) , assuming the continuity of the size distribution , and the extinction of the synthesized radiation field .
however , if we try to fit our data with only the three components , there remains a submillimetre excess we ca nt explain .
we decide to add a fourth component corresponding probably to very cold grains ( vcgs ) , modeled by a black body with an emissivity index @xmath15 to reproduce this excess and to obtain a correct fit varying the mass abundance of this component .
finally we get @xmath16 for 15 data points and 8 free parameters .
all the parameters used are summarized in the following table and compared to the values for the milky - way .
the best fit we obtained is shown on figure [ fig : sed ] . & milky & ngc & milky & ngc & milky & ngc & & ngc + & way & 1569 & way & 1569 & way & 1569 & & 1569 + @xmath13 & @xmath17 & @xmath18 & @xmath19 & @xmath20 & @xmath21 & @xmath22 & @xmath13 & @xmath23 + @xmath5 & 4 @xmath24 & 4 @xmath24 & 12 @xmath24 & 37 @xmath24 & 150 @xmath24 & 47 @xmath24 & t & 7 k + @xmath6 & 12 @xmath24 & 37 @xmath24 & 150 @xmath24 & 47 @xmath24 & 1100 @xmath24 & 8500 @xmath24 & @xmath15 & 1.0 + @xmath7 & 3 & 3 & 2.6 & 2.6 & 2.9 & 2.9 & +
the dust masses deduced from our modeling are @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 and the gas - to - dust mass ratio is @xmath29 .
the dust mass deduce from the extinction is @xmath30 which is the same order of magnitude as the mass deduced from the model .
our results seem to show that the dust mass in ngc 1569 is mainly concentrated in cold dust : big grains and very cold grains which both have roughly the same mass abundance .
the pahs as well as the vsgs are very sparse , while the sed is dominated by bigger grains . 99 dsert , f.x . , boulanger f. , puget , j.l . , 1990 , a&a , * 237 * , 215 fioc , m. , rocca - volmerange , b. , 1997 , a&a , * 326 * , 950 - 962 galliano , f. , madden s. , jones , a. , wilson , c. , 2001 , in preparation hunter , d.a . ,
gallagher iii , j.s .
, 1989 , science , * 243 * , 1557 hunter , d.a . ,
gallagher iii , j.s . , rice , w.l . ,
gillett , f.c .
, 1989 , apj , * 336 * , 152 hunter , d.a . ,
oconnel , r.w . ,
gallagher , j.s .
, smecker - hane , t.a .
, 2000 , apj , * 120 * , 2383 - 2401 israel , f.p . , 1988 , * 194 * , 24 - 32 israel , f.p .
, de bruyn , a.g . , 1988 , *
198 * , 109 - 115 madden , s.c . , 2000 , new astronomy reviews , * 44 * , 249 stil , j. , 1999 , phd thesis waller , w.h . , 1991 , *
370 * , 144 - 157 | dwarf galaxies ideal interplay ism star formation low - metallicity environments hunter 1989 early epochs chemical evolution resembling protogalaxies early few metal - poor galaxies observed in mir iso characteristics mir dust components differ from normal - metallicity starbursts ( madden 2000 ) abundance composition effect clear studying detailed luminosity budget modeling spectral energy distributions constructing templates study conditions primordial galaxies galaxy evolution models galaxy ngc 1569 hi - rich metal - poor ( @xmath0 ) dwarf irregular galaxy near galactic plane distance @xmath1 israel 1988 aftermath of massive burst star formation exhibits compact hii regions 2 super - star - clusters hunter 2000 figure broadband images ngc 1569 with isocam scuba isocam 7.75 @xmath2 band traces aromatic bands scuba band cold grain continuum isocam cvf spectrum for ngc 1569 strong ionic lines due to o - b stars ratio @xmath3/[neii ] } \sim 10 $ limits age stellar clusters to @xmath4 5 myr .weak aromatic bands due to destruction carriers radiation low - metallicity environement steeply rising continuum due to small grains emission dsert et al 1990 model stochastically heated model computes dust emissivity from near - infrared to submillimetre wavelengths coherent interpretation of interstellar extinction infrared emission emission originates from three components aromatic hydrocarbon aromatic 2-dimensional molecules extinction curve vsg small grains 3-dimensional carbon grains absorption bump at 217.5 nm bg big grains 3-dimensional silicate grains rise extinction curve component described by four parameters minimum maximum grain size power - law index scaling factor mass abundance relative to hydrogen number density of grains radius between @xmath9 and @xmath10 is @xmath11 model sed galaxy fitting dsert et al 1990 ) dust model to observations link between stellar radiation field full dust spectrum modeling stellar populations with pegase using uv to nir data mir ionic lines use modeled stellar radiation field input to dust modelbest @xmath12 fit vary parameters mass abundances @xmath13 minimum maximum sizes @xmath5 @xmath6 except @xmath14 continuity size distribution extinction synthesized radiation field fit data with three components submillimetre excess add fourth component very cold grains ( vcgs ) modeled black body emissivity index @xmath15 reproduce excess correct fit varying mass abundance get @xmath16 for 15 data points 8 free parameters parameters summarized in table compared to values milky - way best fit shown on figure sed milky ngc 1569 + @xmath13 @xmath17 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath13 @xmath23 + @xmath5 4 @xmath24 4 @xmath24 12 @xmath24 37 @xmath24 150 @xmath24 47 @xmath24 7 @xmath6 12 @xmath24 37 150 47 1100 8500 @xmath15 1.0 + @xmath7 & 3 2.6 2.9 dust masses deduced are @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 gas - to - dust mass ratio is @xmath29 dust mass extinction @xmath30 same as mass model results show dust mass ngc 1569 concentrated cold dust big cold grains same mass abundance pahs vsgs sparse sed dominated bigger grains 99 dsert boulanger puget j.l 1990 * 237 * , 215 fioc rocca - volmerange 1997 * 326 *, 950 - 962 galliano madden jones wilson c. 2001 preparation hunter gallagher iii j 1989 science * 243 *, 1557 hunter gallagher rice gillett 1989 * 336 *, 152 hunter oconnel gallagher smecker - hane 2000 * 120 * 2383 - 2401 israel f 1988 * 194 * 24 - 32 israel de bruyn 1988 * 198 * , 109 - 115 madden 2000 new astronomy reviews * 44 * 249 stil 1999 phd thesis waller w 1991 * 370 * , 144 - 157 | 0.266938 | 1,774 | 911 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,012 | theoretical results are presented for top quarks produced in annihilation of polarized electrons on positrons .
polarization studies for @xmath0 pairs near threshold are free from hadronization ambiguities .
this is due to the short lifetime of the top quark .
semileptonic decays are discussed as well as their applications in studying polarization dependent processes involving top quarks .
the green function formalism is applied to @xmath0 production at future @xmath1 colliders with polarized beams .
lippmann
schwinger equation is solved numerically for the qcd chromostatic potential given by the two - loop formula at large momentum transfers and richardson ansatz at intermediate and small ones .
the polarization dependent momentum distributions of top quarks and their decay products are calculated .
-1.5 in = 5.5truein = 8.5 in * ttp94 - 24 * + *
november 1994 * | the top quark is the heaviest fermion of the standard model .
its large mass allows to probe deeply into the qcd potential for nonrelativistic @xmath0 system produced near energy threshold .
such a system will provide a unique opportunity for a variety of novel qcd studies .
the lifetime of the top quark is shorter than the formation time of top mesons and toponium resonances .
therefore top decays intercept the process of hadronization at an early stage and practically eliminate associated nonperturbative effects .
the analysis of polarized top quarks and their decays has recently attracted considerable attention , see @xcite and references cited therein .
the reason is that this analysis will result in determination of the top quark coupling to the @xmath2 and @xmath3 bosons either confirming the predictions of the standard model or providing clues for physics beyond .
the latter possibility is particularly intriguing because @xmath4 plays an exceptional role in the fermion mass spectrum .
the polarization fourvector @xmath5 of the top quark can be determined from the angular - energy distributions of the charged leptons in semileptonic @xmath6 decays . in the @xmath6 quark rest frame
this distribution is in born approximation the product of the energy and the angular distributions@xcite : @xmath7\,{{\rm d}\gamma\over{\rm d}e_\ell } \label{eq : elec1}\ ] ] where @xmath8 , @xmath9 and @xmath10 is the angle between @xmath11 and the direction of the charged lepton .
qcd corrections essentially do not spoil factorization@xcite .
thus , the polarization analyzing power of the charged lepton energy - angular distribution remains maximal .
there is no factorization for the neutrino energy - angular distribution which is therefore less sensitive to the polarization of the decaying top quark . on the other hand
it has been shown @xcite that the angular - energy distribution of neutrinos from the polarized top quark decay will allow for a particularly sensitive test of the v - a structure of the weak charged current .
a number of mechanisms has been suggested that will lead to polarized top quarks .
however , studies at a linear electron - positron collider are particularly clean for precision tests .
moreover , close to threshold and with longitudinally polarized electrons one can study decays of polarized top quarks under particularly convenient conditions : large event rates , well identified rest frame of the top quark , and large degree of polarization . at the same time , thanks to the spectacular success of the polarization program at slc @xcite , the longitudinal polarization of the electron beam will be an obvious option for a future linear collider has been reviewed in @xcite and the top quark polarization has been recently considered in @xcite . ] . in this article some results are presented of a recent calculation @xcite of top quark polarization for the reaction @xmath12 in the threshold region . in sect.2
we discuss the dependence of the top quark polarization on the longitudinal polarizations of the beams . due to restricted phase space
the amplitude is dominantly @xmath13 wave and the electron and positron polarizations are directly transferred to the top quark . for a quantitative study
this simple picture has to be extended and the modifications originating from @xmath14 wave interference should be taken into account . in sect.3
all these corrections are calculated from numerical solutions of lippmann - schwinger equations .
we adopt the conventions of ref.@xcite and describe the longitudinal polarization of the @xmath1 system in its center - of - mass frame as a function of the variable @xmath15 where @xmath16 denote the polarizations of @xmath17 with respect to the directions of @xmath18 and @xmath19 beams , respectively collider @xmath20 , @xmath21 and then @xmath22 . ] . in the absence of phases from final state interaction , which can be induced by higher orders in @xmath23 and will be considered elsewhere @xcite , the top quark polarization is in the production plane . @xmath24 and @xmath25 denote the longitudinal and the transverse components of top polarization vector ( in its rest frame ) with respect to the electron beam .
the angle @xmath26 denotes the angle between @xmath19 and the top quark . in the threshold region
the top quark is nonrelativistic ( with velocity @xmath27 ) and the kinetic energy of the @xmath0 system @xmath28 is of the order @xmath29 . retaining only the terms up to @xmath30 one derives the following expressions for the components of the polarization vector : @xmath31 -0.5 cm = 5.5truein -0.2 cm the coefficients
@xmath32 , @xmath33 and @xmath34 depend on the polarization @xmath35 , the electroweak coupling constants , the @xmath3 mass and the center - of - mass energy @xmath36 .
they are plotted in fig.[fig - clchi ] for @xmath37 gev . @xmath32 and @xmath33 are shown in fig.[fig - clchi]a as the solid and the dashed lines , respectively , and @xmath34 as the solid line in fig.[fig - clchi]b .
the function @xmath38 describes the complicated dynamics of the @xmath0 system near threshold .
in particular it includes effects of the would - be toponium resonances and coulomb enhancement .
nevertheless , it is possible to calculate this function using the green function method .
the same function @xmath38 also governs the forward - backward asymmetry in @xmath12 @xmath39 where @xmath40 is shown as the dashed line in fig.[fig - clchi]b .
eqs.([eq:2 ] ) and ( [ eq:3 ] ) extend the results of @xcite into the threshold region .
the green function method has become a standard tool for studying @xmath1 annihilation in the threshold region @xcite .
we follow the momentum space approach of @xcite and solve the lippmann - schwinger equations numerically for the @xmath13-wave and @xmath41-wave green functions @xmath42 where @xmath43 is the momentum of the top quark in @xmath0 rest frame , @xmath44 @xmath45 denotes the top width and @xmath46 is the qcd potential in momentum space ; see @xcite for details .
the function @xmath38 is related to @xmath47 and @xmath48 : @xmath49 where @xmath50 has been introduced in order to cut off a logarithmic divergence of the numerator .
the denominator remains finite for @xmath51 . in experimental analyses
the contributions of very large intrinsic momenta will be automatically suppressed by separation of @xmath0 events from the background . in our calculation
we use @xmath52 . the function @xmath38 is plotted in fig.[fig - fir]a for @xmath37 gev .
the qcd potential depends on @xmath53 and our results have been obtained for @xmath54 . for a comparison in fig.[fig - fir]b the annihilation cross section @xmath55 is shown in units of the annihilation cross section @xmath56 .
= 4.5truein -0.5 cm -0.8 cm
mj would like to thank the stefan batory foundation for a travel grant and the local organizing committee for an additional support which enabled his participation in spin94 .
this work was supported in part by kbn grant 2p30225206 and by dfg contract 436pol173193s .
khn , `` top quark at a linear collider '' , in _ physics and experiments with linear @xmath1 colliders _ ,
harris et al . , ( world scientific , singapore , 1993 ) , p.72 .
m. jeabek , _ top quark physics _ , in proceedings of zeuthen workshop
_ physics at lep 200 and beyond _ , to appear in nucl .
b(1994 ) suppl . ;
karlsruhe preprint ttp94 - 09
. m. jeabek and j.h .
khn , nucl .
phys . b320 ( 1989 ) 20 .
a. czarnecki , m. jeabek and j.h .
khn , nucl .
b351 ( 1991 ) 70 ; + a. czarnecki and m. jeabek , nucl . phys .
b427 ( 1994 ) 3 .
m. jeabek and j.h .
khn , phys .
b329 ( 1994 ) 317 .
m. woods , _ polarization at slac _
, in these proceedings .
p.m. zerwas ( ed . ) , @xmath1 collisions at 500 gev : the physics potential , desy orange reports desy 92 - 123a , desy 92 - 123b and desy 93 - 123c .
fadin , v.a .
khoze and m.i .
kotsky , z. phys .
c64 ( 1994 ) 45 .
r. harlander , m. jeabek , j.h .
khn and t. teubner , to be published .
g. alexander et al .
( eds . ) , _ polarization at lep _ ,
cern 88 - 06 , geneva 1988 .
khn , a. reiter and p.m. zerwas , nucl .
b272 ( 1986 ) 560 .
fadin and v.a .
khoze , jetp lett .
46 ( 1987 ) 525 ; sov .
48 ( 1988 ) 309 .
strassler and m.e .
peskin , phys .
rev d43 ( 1991 ) 1500 .
y. sumino , k. fujii , k. hagiwara , h. murayama and c .- k .
ng , phys .
d47 ( 1993 ) 56 ; h. murayama and y. sumino , phys .
d47 ( 1993 ) 82 .
m. jeabek , j.h .
khn and t. teubner , z. phys . c56 ( 1992 ) 653 ; + m. jeabek and t. teubner , z. phys .
c59 ( 1993 ) 669 . | top quark heaviest fermion standard model large mass allows qcd potential for nonrelativistic @xmath0 system near energy threshold unique opportunity for novel qcd studies lifetime top quark shorter than formation top mesons toponium resonances top decays intercept hadronization eliminate nonperturbative effects analysis of polarized top quarks decays attracted attention analysis top quark coupling to @xmath2 @xmath3 bosons confirming predictions standard model or providing clues for physics @xmath4 exceptional role in fermion mass spectrum polarization fourvector @xmath5 top quark determined from angular - energy distributions charged leptons in semileptonic @xmath6 decays quark rest frame distribution product of energy angular distributions angle between @xmath11 direction charged lepton qcd corrections spoil factorization polarization analyzing power charged lepton energy - angular distribution remains maximal no factorization for neutrino energy - angular distribution less sensitive to polarization decaying top quarkshown angular - energy distribution neutrinos polarized top quark decay sensitive test v - structure weak charged current mechanisms suggested to polarized top quarks studies linear electron - positron collider clean for precision tests close to threshold longitudinally polarized electrons decays polarized top quarks under convenient conditions large event rates rest frame large degree polarization polarization program slc @xcite longitudinal polarization electron beam option for future linear collider reviewed top quark polarization considered results recent calculation top quark polarization for reaction @xmath12 in threshold region sect.2 dependence top quark polarization on longitudinal polarizations restricted phase space amplitude @xmath13 wave electron positron polarizations transferred to top quark quantitative study picture extended modifications from @xmath14 wave interference sect.3 corrections calculated from numerical solutions lippmann - schwinger equations conventions of ref.@xcite describe longitudinal polarization @xmath1 system mass function variable @xmath15 @xmath16 polarizations @xmath17 directions @xmath18 beams collider @xmath20 @xmath22 absence phases final state interaction induced higher orders @xmath23 top quark polarization production plane @xmath24 @xmath25 denote longitudinal transverse components top polarization vector electron beam angle @xmath26 angle @xmath19 top quark threshold region top quark nonrelativistic velocity @xmath27 kinetic energy @xmath0 system @xmath28 order @xmath29 terms @xmath30 expressions components polarization vector @xmath31 -0.5 cm = -0.2 cm coefficients @xmath32 @xmath34 depend polarization @xmath35 electroweak coupling constants @xmath3 mass center - - mass energy @xmath36 plotted fig. - clchi @xmath37 @xmath32 @xmath33 shown fig. - solid dashed lines @xmath34 solid line. function @xmath38 describes dynamics @xmath0 system near threshold includes effects toponium resonances coulomb enhancementcalculate function using green function method function @xmath38 governs forward - backward asymmetry in @xmath12 @xmath40 dashed line in fig. - extend results @xcite into threshold region green function method standard tool studying @xmath1 annihilation threshold region follow momentum space approach solve lippmann - schwinger equations for @xmath13 @xmath41-wave green functions @xmath43 momentum top quark top width qcd potential momentum space function @xmath38 related to @xmath47 @xmath48 introduced cut off logarithmic divergence numerator denominator finite for @xmath51 contributions large intrinsic momenta suppressed by separation @xmath0 events background calculation use @xmath52 function @xmath38 plotted in fig. - fir @xmath37 qcd potential depends on @xmath53 results obtained for @xmath54 fig. - annihilation cross section @xmath55 shown in units cross section @xmath56 -0.5 -0.8 cm stefan batory foundation travel grant local organizing committee support participation spin94work supported kbn grant 2p30225206 dfg contract 436pol173193s top quark linear collider physics experiments linear @xmath1 colliders harris world scientific singapore 1993 p.72 jeabek top quark physics proceedings zeuthen workshop lep 200 beyond nucl(1994 ) karlsruhe preprint ttp94 - 09 jeabek j khn . b320 ( 1989 ) 20 czarnecki khn nucl b351 ( 1991 ) 70 czarnecki jeabek phys b427 ( 1994 ) 3 jeabek khn phys b329 ( 1994 ) 317 woods polarization slac proceedings zerwas @xmath1 collisions at 500 gev potential orange reports 92 - 123a - 123b 93 - 123c fadin khoze kotsky phys . c64 ( 1994 ) 45 harlander jeabek j khn teubner alexander polarization at lep cern 88 - 06 geneva 1988 reiter zerwas nucl. b272 ( 1986 ) 560fadin v khoze jetp lett 46 1987 ) 525 sov 48 1988 ) 309 strassler peskin phys d43 1991 ) 1500 sumino fujii hagiwara murayama ng phys d47 1993 ) 56 murayama sumino d47 1993 82 jeabek j khn t teubner c56 1992 ) 653 t teubner phys c59 1993 ) 669 | 0.347485 | 2,293 | 1,166 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,014 | 54.8pt 54.8pt we study paramagnetic - ferromagnetic transition due to exchange interaction between classical localized magnetic moments and conduction electrons .
we formulate the dynamical mean field approximation equations for arbitrary electron dispersion law , concentration and relation between exchange coupling and the electron band width . solving these equations
we find explicit formula for the transition temperature @xmath0 .
we present the results of calculations of the @xmath0 for the semi - circular electron density of states . 2 | the double - exchange ( de ) model @xcite is one of the basic ones in the theory of magnetism .
magnetic ordering appears in this model due to exchange coupling between the core spins and the conduction electrons .
the hamiltonian of the model is @xmath1 where @xmath2 and @xmath3 are the electrons annihilation and creation operators , @xmath4 is the operator of a core spin , @xmath5 is the electron hopping , @xmath6 is the exchange coupling between a core spin and n electrons , @xmath7 is the vector of the pauli matrices , and @xmath8 are spin indices .
the model ( the core spins being treated as classical vectors ) began to be studied several decades ago @xcite . because of a recent general interest in manganites , it reappeared in the focus of attention ( see reviews @xcite and references therein ) . in particular , application of the dynamical mean field approximation ( dmfa )
@xcite substantially advanced our understanding of the properties of the de model @xcite .
most of the papers dealing with the model , starting from classical paper by de gennes @xcite , considered the de hamiltonian with infinite exchange ( and with the addition of the antiferromagnetic superexchange , which is crucial for the explanation of magnetic properties of manganites ) .
however lately many properties of the model for arbitrary strength of the exchange were analyzed @xcite . in this paper
we calculate the temperature of a paramagnetic - ferromagnetic transition @xmath0 in a double - exchange model for arbitrary electron dispersion law , concentration and relation between the exchange coupling and the electron band width by formulating and solving the dmfa equations .
we treat the core spins as classical vectors .
spins being considered as classical vectors @xmath9 ( with the normalization @xmath10 ) , the problem becomes a single electron one .
the de hamiltonian in a single electron representation can be presented as @xmath11 let us introduce green s function @xmath12 and local green s function @xmath13 in the last equation , the averaging is with respect to random configurations of the core spins . in the framework of the dmfa approach to the problem ( see @xcite and references therein ) the local green s function is expressed through the the local self - energy @xmath14 by the equation @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the bare ( in the absence of the exchange interaction ) local green s function .
the self - energy satisfies equation @xmath17 where @xmath18 , and @xmath19 is a probability of a given spin orientation ( one - site probability ) .
the quantities @xmath20 and @xmath14 are @xmath21 matrices in spin space .
the difference between eq .
( [ cpa ] ) and similar equation appearing in the coherent potential approximation @xcite , is due to the fact that in our problem the disorder is annealed ( and not quenched ) . that is the probability of a given ( random ) core spin configuration
is determined by the energy of electron subsystem interacting with this configuration . to understand the dmfa assumption allowing to find the probability @xmath19 self - consistently with the solution of eq .
( [ cpa ] ) , notice that eq .
( [ cpa ] ) reduces the problem of electron scattering by many spins , to scattering by a single spin with the effective potential @xmath22 .
the spin is embedded in an effective medium , described by the hamiltonian @xmath23 , and , hence , by the local green s function @xmath24 .
consider the change in the number of electron states in such system due to a single spin .
we get @xcite @xmath25,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the argument of both @xmath26 and @xmath27 is @xmath28 .
so the change in thermodynamic potential is @xcite @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the fermi function .
the dmfa approximation for the one - site probability @xmath19 is : @xmath31.\end{aligned}\ ] ] eqs .
( [ cpa ] ) and ( [ prob2 ] ) are the system of non - linear ( integral ) equations .
however , the system is grossly simplified in paramagnetic ( pm ) phase , where the macroscopic magnetization @xmath32 . in this case
@xmath33 , the averaging in eq . (
[ cpa ] ) can be performed explicitly , and we obtain @xmath34 where @xmath35 , @xmath36 , where @xmath37 is a unity matrix . in the ferromagnetic ( fm ) phase near the curie temperature , eqs .
( [ cpa ] ) and ( [ prob2 ] ) can be linearized @xcite with respect to @xmath38 .
thus we reduce the dmfa equations to a traditional mf equation @xcite @xmath39 the parameter @xmath0 is formally introduced as a coefficient in the expansion of @xmath40 with respect to @xmath38 .
non - trivial solution of the mf equation @xmath41 can exist only for @xmath42 , hence @xmath0 is the ferromagnetic transition temperature . in all cases
@xmath0 turns out to be much less the chemical potential , so we can consider electron gas as degenerate . in this case @xmath43 where the chemical potential
( in paramagnetic phase ) is found from the equation @xmath44 and @xmath45 is the number of electrons per site . for the @xmath0 , after straightforward , though lengthy algebra , we obtain @xmath46de , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath27 and @xmath47 are determined by the properties of the system in the pm phase ; they are the solutions of eqs .
( [ local ] ) and ( [ cpa2 ] ) ; @xmath48 . eq .
( [ theta ] ) is the main result of our paper . in the case of weak exchange @xmath49 eq .
( [ theta ] ) takes the form @xmath50de.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in fact , this equation is the mf approximation @xcite for the rkky hamiltonian @xcite , to which the original hamiltonian ( [ hamdxm ] ) can be reduced in the case @xmath51 . in the opposite case @xmath52 we have to consider only one spin sub - band .
( because of the symmetry of the problem with respect to transformation @xmath53 , everywhere further on we consider only the case @xmath54 . )
after we shift @xmath55 , @xmath27 and @xmath56 by @xmath6 , we obtain @xmath57de , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath47 is found from the equation @xmath58
let us apply eq .
( [ theta ] ) to the case of semi - circular ( sc ) bare density of states ( dos ) @xmath59 then @xmath60.\end{aligned}\ ] ] from eq .
( [ local ] ) follows @xmath61 and eq .
( [ cpa2 ] ) can be written as @xmath62 eq .
( [ theta ] ) takes the form @xmath63de .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the case of weak exchange @xmath64 , we obtain @xmath65 where @xmath66 in the case of strong exchange @xmath67 , eq .
( [ theta2 ] ) takes the form @xcite
@xmath68de\nonumber\\ = \frac{w\sqrt{2}}{4\pi}\left [ \sqrt{1-y^2}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\tan^{-1 } \sqrt{3(1-y^2)}\right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath69 .
if , in addition , @xmath70 , we obtain @xmath71 notice , that virtual crystal approximation ( for @xmath72 ) @xcite gives @xmath73 thus being imprecise by a factor of 4 . for arbitrary exchange , the integral in eq .
( [ thetasc ] ) can be calculated only numerically .
the results of such calculation are presented on fig .
1 . = 3truein [ fig.1 ]
note that that our main result ( equation for the @xmath0 ) indicates it s own limits of validity . in part of the @xmath74 plane , eq .
( [ thetasc ] ) gives @xmath75 .
negative value of @xmath0 means , that at any temperature , including @xmath76 , the paramagnetic phase is stable with respect to appearance of small spontaneous magnetic moment , and strongly suggests that the ground state in this part of the phase plane is nonferromagnetic @xcite .
the mechanisms leading to the destruction of ferromagnetism can be easily understood in the extreme cases of weak and strong exchange .
it is well known , that for @xmath49 the de hamiltonian can be reduced to to the rkky hamiltonian ( see review @xcite and references to the original papers therein ) @xmath77 thus weak exchange between the electrons and the core spins generates effective long - range and sign oscillating effective exchange interaction between the core spins . in the opposite case @xmath52 , we can reduce the de hamiltonian ( [ generic ] ) to effective ( classic ) @xmath78 model ( see review @xcite and references therein ) . to do that , first diagonalize the exchange part of the de hamiltonian by choosing local spin quantization axis on each site in the direction of @xmath79 , the latter being determined by polar angle @xmath80 and azimuthal angle @xmath81 . in this representation
the hamiltonian is @xmath82 where @xmath83 the next step is to apply a canonical transformation @xmath84+\frac{1}{2}[s[s , h]]+\dots\end{aligned}\ ] ] which excludes all band - to - band transitions .
this can be achieved if we chose the operator @xmath85 in the form @xmath86 we have @xmath87_{nn'}=-t_{nn'}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & b_{nn'}\\ b_{n'n}^ * & 0\end{array}\right)\nonumber\\ \left[s,[s , h^{ex}]\right]_{nn } = 2\sum_{n''}i_{nn''}\left(\begin{array}{cc } -|b_{nn''}|^2 & 0\\ 0 & |b_{nn''}|^2\end{array}\right),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath88 . keeping terms up to the second order with respect to @xmath89 ( and only site - diagonal part of the second order terms ) we obtain @xmath90 in the second quantization the hamiltonian obtained has the form ( ignoring the constant term ) @xmath91 d_n^{\dagger}d_{n'}\nonumber\\ + \sum_{nn'}i_{nn'}{\bf m}_n\cdot{\bf m}_{n'}d_n^{\dagger}d_{n},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath92 is the operator of creation ( annihilation ) of a spinless electron .
thus strong exchange between the electrons and the core spins generates effective short - range antiferromagnetic exchange between the core spins . in conclusion
, we formulated the dynamical mean field approximation equations for the double - exchange model with classical spins for arbitrary electron dispersion law , concentration and relation between the exchange and the electron bandwidth . in the vicinity of the paramagnetic - ferromagnetic transition critical temperature @xmath0 , these equations were reduced to a mf equation , describing a single spin in an effective field , proportional to the macroscopic magnetization , and we obtained explicit formula for the @xmath0 . for the semi - circular electron density of states we explicitly calculated the transition temperature as a function of the exchange interaction and electron concentration | double - exchange model @xcite basic in theory magnetism magnetic ordering due to exchange coupling between core spins conduction electrons hamiltonian is @xmath1 @xmath2 electrons annihilation creation operators @xmath4 operator core spin @xmath5 electron hopping @xmath6 exchange coupling between core spin n electrons @xmath7 vector of pauli matrices @xmath8 spin indices model core spins classical vectors studied decades ago recent interest in manganites reappeared application dynamical mean field approximation dmfa @xcite advanced understanding properties model papers considered de hamiltonian with infinite exchange antiferromagnetic superexchange crucial for explanation magnetic properties of manganites lately properties model for arbitrary strength exchange analyzed @xcite calculate temperature of paramagnetic - ferromagnetic transition @xmath0 double - exchange model for arbitrary electron dispersion law concentration relation exchange coupling electron band width formulating solving dmfa equations treat core spins as classical vectors @xmath9 normalization @xmath10 problem becomes single electron onede hamiltonian single electron presented as @xmath11 introduce green s function @xmath12 local green s function @xmath13 last equation averaging random configurations core spins dmfa approach local green s function expressed self - energy @xmath14 equation @xmath15 @xmath16 local green s function self - energy satisfies equation @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 probability spin orientation - quantities @xmath20 @xmath14 are @xmath21 matrices spin space difference between eq . ( [ cpa ] ) similar equation coherent potential approximation @xcite due disorder annealed probability random core spin configuration determined by energy electron subsystem interacting understand dmfa assumption find probability @xmath19 solution eq . cpa eq reduces electron scattering many spins single spin effective potential @xmath22 spin embedded effective medium described by hamiltonian @xmath23 local green s function @xmath24 consider change electron states due to single spin @xcite @xmath25 argument @xmath26 @xmath27 is @xmath28 change in thermodynamic potential is @xcite @xmath29 @xmath30 fermi functiondmfa approximation one - site probability @xmath19 @xmath31. eqs cpa prob2 ] non - linear equations system simplified in paramagnetic phase macroscopic magnetization @xmath32 @xmath33 averaging eq ( [ cpa performed obtain @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath37 unity matrix ferromagnetic phase curie temperature eqs ( cpa prob2 linearized @xcite @xmath38 reduce dmfa equations to traditional mf equation @xmath39 parameter @xmath0 introduced coefficient in expansion @xmath40 @xmath38 non - trivial solution mf equation @xmath41 for @xmath42 @xmath0 ferromagnetic transition temperature @xmath0 less chemical potential electron gas degenerate @xmath43 chemical potential paramagnetic from equation @xmath44 @xmath45 number of electrons per site @xmath0 obtain @xmath46de @xmath27 @xmath47 determined by properties system pm phase solutions of eqs . ( [ local ) ( [ cpa2 ] ) @xmath48 eq . ( [ theta ] ) main result paperweak exchange @xmath49 eq theta takes form @xmath50de.{aligned equation mf approximation rkky hamiltonian original hamiltonian reduced @xmath51 opposite case @xmath52 consider one spin sub - band symmetry problem transformation @xmath53 consider @xmath54 shift @xmath55 @xmath27 @xmath56 by @xmath6 obtain @xmath57de{aligned @xmath47 found from equation @xmath58 apply eq . theta semi - circular sc bare density states @xmath59 @xmath60.{aligned} follows @xmath61 cpa2 written @xmath62 eq theta form @xmath63de {aligned weak exchange @xmath64 obtain @xmath65 @xmath66 strong exchange @xmath67 eq. theta2 takes form @xcite @xmath68de\nonumber\\ = \frac{w\sqrt{2}}{4\pi}\left \sqrt{1-y^2}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\tan^{-1 } \sqrt{3(1-y^2)}\right{aligned} @xmath69 @xmath70 obtain @xmath71 virtual crystal approximation @xmath72 ) @xcite gives @xmath73 imprecise by factor 4 arbitrary exchange integral in eq . ( [ thetasc ] ) calculated numerically results presented on fig . 1 = main result equation @xmath0 ) indicates limits validity @xmath74 plane eq . ( [ thetasc ] gives @xmath75 negative value of @xmath0 means any temperature including @xmath76 paramagnetic phase stable small spontaneous magnetic moment suggests ground state nonferromagnetic mechanisms destruction of ferromagnetism understood cases weak strong exchange @xmath49 de hamiltonian reduced to rkky hamiltonian @xmath77 weak exchange between electrons core spins generates effective long - range oscillating exchange opposite case @xmath52 reduce de hamiltonian to effective classic @xmath78 model diagonalize exchange part de hamiltonian local spin quantization axis site direction of @xmath79 determined by polar angle @xmath80 azimuthal angle @xmath81hamiltonian @xmath82 @xmath83 apply canonical transformation @xmath84+\frac{1}{2}[s[s+\dots excludes band - to - band transitions operator @xmath85 form @xmath86 @xmath87_{nn'}=-t_{nn'}}0 b_{nn'_}^ * 0_{nn } = 2\sum_{n''}i_{nn''} -|b_{nn''}|^2 & 0\\_{nn''}|^2 @xmath88 terms second order @xmath89 obtain @xmath90 second quantization hamiltonian form @xmath91 d_n^{\dagger}d_{n'}\nonumber\\ + \sum_{nn'}i_{nn'}{\bf}_n\cdot{}_{n'}d_n^{\dagger}d_{n}{aligned @xmath92 operator creation spinless electron strong exchange electrons core spins generates short - range antiferromagnetic exchange formulated dynamical mean field approximation equations double - exchange model classical spins arbitrary electron dispersion law concentration relation exchange electron bandwidthparamagnetic - ferromagnetic transition critical temperature equations reduced mf equation single spin effective field proportional macroscopic magnetization obtained formula semi - circular electron density calculated transition temperature function exchange interaction electron concentration | 0.426946 | 2,604 | 1,383 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,018 | the authors modify a non - perturbative approach based on the principle of minimal sensitivity to calculate the periods of relativistic oscillators with even polynomial potentials .
the optimization of the variational parameter is adapted by using the ultrarelativistic limit of the period as a boundary condition , which determines the values of additional free parameters introduced .
general approximations for the potentials @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath2 prove to be accurate over the whole solution domain and even for large values of @xmath3 . | interest in the relativistic harmonic oscillator has either focused on its mathematical and physical characteristics @xcite or on analytic approaches of solving its non - linear equation of motion , given non - dimensionally as @xmath4 the latter is motivated by the general significance of the study of strongly non - linear oscillators , particularly in developing efficient approximation methods to treat them @xcite .
recently , the non - perturbative methods of harmonic balance @xcite and homotopy @xcite have been succesfully applied to give analytic approximations of the oscillation period and periodic solution of eq.[harmonic ] . unlike traditional perturbation theory
, these asymptotic techniques do not rely on any linear term or physically small parameter .
hence their results are unrestricted by a radius of convergence .
for both methods , the approximations had minimal error over the entire domain of the particle s maximum velocity , @xmath5 . , where eq.[harmonic ] reduces to the linear oscillator .
while in the limit @xmath6 , the oscillator is energetic enough to reach relativistic speeds , which describes a highly non - linear system .
] however , the applicability of these approaches has thus far been restricted to the linear potential . in this work
we contribute a novel method for computing analytic approximations of the period of strongly anharmonic oscillations described by @xmath7 for an even polynomial potential @xmath8 of general form .
we adopt a non - perturbative approach that has been developed and applied by amore et al . in computing periods of non - linear oscillators @xcite and formally equivalent systems such as the deflection angle in gravitational lensing @xcite .
the method operates by converting the relevant integral into a series carrying a variational parameter @xmath9 , which can be chosen using the principle of minimal sensitivity ( pms ) @xcite . in our case the standard procedure for choosing @xmath9 is modified by treating the existing harmonics as free parameters . these are then assigned values by imposing the ultrarelativistic limit of the period as a boundary condition
. although the necessary computations are simple , the resulting approximations are compact and accurate over the whole solution domain .
as applied to the relativistic harmonic oscillator @xcite , the qualitative analysis of ordinary differential equations detailed in ref.@xcite can be used to show that the solution to eq.[coordtime ] is indeed periodic .
that is , the phase space trajectories given by @xmath10 where @xmath11 , are closed and have the strip structure : @xmath12 the period of this system can be derived from the generalized energy - momentum relation @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the total energy and @xmath15 is the relativistic momentum . in all our equations
the rest mass and speed of light are set to unity . by noting that the total energy is the sum of the potential energy at the amplitude @xmath16 and the rest mass , i.e. @xmath17 , it can be shown from eq.[energymom ] that @xmath18 which leads to the following expression for the period : @xmath19[\pa-\px+2]}}. \label{coordperiod}\end{aligned}\ ] ]
since the period is a function of the oscillation amplitude , it would be useful to express the physical regimes described by @xmath20 in terms of this parameter . setting @xmath21 in eq.[rel1 ] gives @xmath22}}{1+\pa}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this relation maps the domain @xmath5 unto @xmath23 . for an even potential @xmath8 , the period from eq.[coordperiod ] can be written as @xmath24}}. \label{coordperiod2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we approximate @xmath25 with the solvable harmonic potential @xmath26 , in a manner that is essentially a linear delta expansion @xcite : @xmath27[\w^2+\delta(\rx-\w^2)]}}. \label{lde}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the above equation , when @xmath28 we have the case of simple harmonic motion , while for @xmath29 the system reduces to the original potential of eq.[coordperiod2 ] . with a change of variable @xmath30 ,
the above equation becomes @xmath31 where the substitution @xmath32 has been made .
a binomial expansion of the integrand in powers of @xmath33 then gives @xmath34 where we have set @xmath29 .
evaluating the above series to a finite order will leave an explicit @xmath9-dependence that should be eliminated .
indeed this is the basis of the pms , requiring that @xmath35 .
as shown in ref.@xcite , the condition is equivalent to choosing @xmath9 such that @xmath36 for an nth order optimization . to first order ,
the above criterion is equivalently @xmath37 where @xmath38 denotes the mean value of @xmath39 . for classical oscillators eq.[pms2 ]
is implemented easily , yielding remarkable results @xcite . in the case of relativistic oscillators
however , the expressions not only become cumbersome but are divergent at large oscillation amplitudes even with higher order computations .
for example , we find that the resulting @xmath9 computed for the relativistic quartic oscillator approaches unity as @xmath40 .
this marks an ineffective variation since the choice @xmath41 gives the exact untreated series .
hence for any order of calculation , the error of approximation increases rapidly beyond @xmath42 ( @xmath43 ) . the alternative criterion given by eq.36 of ref.@xcite is also found to be problematic because the resulting @xmath9 goes to infinity as @xmath40 .
since all terms in eq.[series ] are proportional to powers of @xmath44 , then any finite order approximation incorrectly goes to zero in the ultrarelativistic limit @xmath40 .
the correct large amplitude behavior can be verified by noting from eq.[rel1 ] that @xmath45 in this regime .
hence , eq.[coordperiod ] simplifies to what is expected for a photon bouncing in a box of width @xmath46 : @xmath47 the preceding limit will serve as the asymptotic boundary condition that determines our variational parameter .
we begin constructing our solution by noting that the zeroth order truncation of the series in eq.[series ] is @xmath48 we then assume the form of @xmath9 that directly satisfies eq.[pms ] , namely @xmath49 in the above equation @xmath9 is still dependent on the variable of integration @xmath50 since harmonics of the form @xmath51 are present . to remove this , we treat the harmonics as free parameters , denoting @xmath51 as @xmath52 .
next , we look at the limit of @xmath9 as @xmath40 . it can be shown that for an even potential with leading order @xmath53 , the large amplitude behavior is @xmath54 substituting eqs.[uperiod ] and [ wlarge1 ] in the limit @xmath40 of eq.[approx ] will yield a relation between all orders of free parameters that exist in @xmath55 .
this relation can be used recursively to provide @xmath3 equations .
however for a non - linear potential , the system of equations is under - determined since there are a total of @xmath56 free parameters .
we remedy this problem by factoring out @xmath57 from the numerator and denominator in eq.[wlarge1 ] , giving us @xmath58 thus the large amplitude limit of eq.[approx ] yields the relation @xmath59 under the ansatz of setting the lowest order free parameter to be its trigonometric average , i.e. @xmath60 , the @xmath61 case of the above equation determines @xmath62 .
these values are then used in the @xmath63 equation to solve for @xmath64 and so on , effectively building the whole set of @xmath3 free parameters from the bottom up .
this iterative computation yields that for integers @xmath65 the free parameters are given by @xmath66 we use these values in @xmath55 and determine @xmath9 by eq.[pms3 ] . then by eq.[approx ] the resulting approximation is @xmath67
as a first example we apply the method to the linear potential . plugging in @xmath68 in eq.[coordperiod ] and following the general derivation previously outlined yields @xmath69 in calculating the free parameters present in @xmath55 we utilize the relation given by eq.[wlarge1 ] since for @xmath70 the system is not under - determined .
accordingly , the ultrarelativistic limit of eq.[approx ] gives the relation @xmath71 by using @xmath60 in the above equation , we determine @xmath72 .
we then substitute these values into eq.[harmr ] and use eq.[approx2 ] , giving us the compact expression for the period @xmath73 we compare this with the exact period given by @xmath74 - 8 \text{k}\left[\frac{a^2}{4+a^2}\right]}{\sqrt{4+a^2 } } , \label{exact}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath75 $ ] and @xmath76 $ ] are the elliptic integrals of the first and second kind , respectively .
figure [ fig1 ] shows the relative error of eq.[harmperiod ] along with those of the results of harmonic balance @xcite and homotopy @xcite . despite the simplicity of our calculation , the third order approximations of both these methods are only more accurate by @xmath77 over a finite range of @xmath16 .
our solution is the only approximation whose error goes to zero at the ultrarelativistic limit .
an advantage is also apparent in the resulting expression itself , that it is compact and mathematically elementary , while those of harmonic balance and homotopy are lengthy and even require the evaluation of elliptic integrals .
the most note - worthy point of our method is its extensive applicability . for our second example
we calculate a general approximation for the periods of relativistic oscillators with the potential @xmath78 .
as we have done previously , we obtain the function @xmath55 by following the derivation starting from eq.[coordperiod ] .
the result is @xmath79 where @xmath80 note that this expression has been factored in a manner compatible with eq.[wlarge2 ] so that the existing free parameters are defined by eq.[free ] .
then the approximation simply follows from eq.[approx2 ] .
explicitly , the result is @xmath81\ } } } , \label{gent}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have evaluated the geometric sum appearing in eq.[genr ] . to give specific examples of this general result , the approximations for the periods of the relativistic quartic ( @xmath61 ) and sextic ( @xmath63 ) oscillators are respectively @xmath82}{\sqrt{(4 + 3 a^2)[6 a^4+(8+a^2 ) \pi ^2 ] } } \label{duffperiod}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath83[24 \pi ^4 + 3 a^2 \pi ^4+a^6 ( 20 \pi ^2 - 48)]}}. \label{qsperiod}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the approximations for the cases @xmath84 and the harmonic potential are fitted with the numerically integrated exact results in figure [ fig2 ] .
the relative errors shown in the inset are remarkably low even for the highly non - linear case of @xmath85 .
for such large values of @xmath3 the period exhibits a sharp jump from what is characteristically harmonic at amplitudes @xmath86 to the ultrarelativistic limit for @xmath87 . as a third example
, we derive a general approximation for the periods of relativistic oscillators with the potential @xmath88 .
again , the crux of the calculation is deriving a general form of @xmath55 and factoring it compatible with eq.[wlarge2 ] so that the free parameters are determined by eq.[free ] .
then by using eq.[approx2 ] , the following result is obtained @xmath89\ } } } , \label{gent2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath90 for @xmath61 this reduces to eq.[duffperiod ] , the period of a relativistic quartic oscillator . for @xmath63
, it provides the following approximation to the period of a relativistic particle oscillating under the potential @xmath91 @xmath92}{\sqrt{[-24 a^4+(12 + 9 a^2 + 10 a^4 ) \pi ^2][-48 a^6 + 2 a^4 ( 9 + 10 a^2 ) \pi ^2 + 3 ( 8+a^2 ) \pi ^4 ] } } .
\label{period246}\end{aligned}\ ] ] figure [ fig3 ] shows the approximations for the cases @xmath93 and @xmath94 , fitted with the numerically integrated exact results .
notably , the inset shows low relative errors whose maximum do not increase with increasing @xmath3 .
lastly , we treat relativistic oscillators with the intrinsically non - linear potential @xmath2 . using the same procedure of deriving a general expression for @xmath55 and using eqs.[free ] and [ approx2 ] ,
the result is @xmath95}{a^{m-1}\sqrt{[4m+a^{2m}(1-\lambda_{2 m } ) ] \{\frac{3}{2}+\frac{\pi^2 - 6}{4}[1-(\frac{\pi^2 - 4}{\pi^2})^{m-2 } ] \ } } } .
\label{gent3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for example , setting @xmath61 in the equation above gives the following approximation for the period of a relativistic oscillator with potential @xmath96 @xmath97 the approximations for the cases @xmath98 and @xmath99 and their numerically integrated exact results are shown in figure [ fig4 ] .
the method is able to capture the infinities at both regimes of the oscillation period .
our modification of a pms - based non - perturbative method offers an economical procedure of calculating compact and accurate analytic expressions for the period of an oscillating relativistic particle .
it is able to attack even polynomial potentials of general form , including those that are intrinsically non - linear .
the mechanics of the method itself guarantees the accuracy of the solution even at the ultrarelativistic limit . | interest in relativistic harmonic oscillator focused on mathematical physical characteristics @xcite or analytic approaches solving non - linear equation of motion motivated by significance study of non - linear oscillators developing efficient approximation methods non - perturbative methods of harmonic balance homotopy applied analytic approximations of oscillation period periodic solution of eq.[harmonic ] techniques rely on linear term small parameter results unrestricted by radius convergence approximations minimal error over particle s maximum velocity reduces to linear oscillator @xmath6 oscillator energetic relativistic speeds non - linear system applicability approaches restricted to linear potential work novel method for computing analytic approximations of period of anharmonic oscillations @xmath7 for even polynomial potential @xmath8 adopt non - perturbative approach developed by amore et al . computing periods of non - linear oscillators @xcite systems method converting relevant integral into series carrying variational parameter @xmath9 chosen using principle of minimal sensitivity procedure for treating existing harmonics as free parametersassigned values ultrarelativistic limit period boundary condition computations simple approximations compact accurate over solution domain applied to relativistic harmonic oscillator @xcite qualitative analysis differential equations solution to eq.[coordtime periodic phase space trajectories @xmath10 @xmath11 closed strip structure @xmath12 period derived from energy - momentum relation @xmath13 @xmath14 total energy @xmath15 relativistic momentum rest mass speed of light set to unity total energy sum potential energy at amplitude @xmath16 rest mass @xmath17 @xmath18 leads expression period : @xmath19[\pa-\px+2]}} period function of oscillation amplitude express physical regimes @xmath20 parameter setting @xmath21 in eq.[rel1 gives @xmath22}}{1+\pa} relation maps domain @xmath5 unto @xmath23 even potential @xmath8 period from[coordperiod written as @xmath24}} approximate @xmath25 with solvable harmonic potential @xmath26 linear delta expansion @xcite : @xmath27[\w^2+\delta(\rx-\w^2)]}}\label{lde}\end{aligned} equation @xmath28 simple harmonic motion @xmath29 system reduces original potential eq.[coordperiod2 change variable @xmath30 equation becomes @xmath31 substitution @xmath32 binomial expansion integrand powers @xmath33 gives @xmath34 set @xmath29 evaluating series finite order @xmath9-dependence basis pms @xmath35.@xcite condition equivalent choosing @xmath9 @xmath36 nth order optimization criterion @xmath37 @xmath38 mean value @xmath39 classical oscillators eq.[pms2 ] implemented easily remarkable results relativistic oscillators expressions cumbersome divergent large oscillation amplitudes higher computations resulting @xmath9 approaches unity as @xmath40 ineffective variation choice @xmath41 gives untreated series error of approximation increases beyond @xmath42 ( @xmath43 ) alternative criterion eq.36.@xcite problematic resulting @xmath9 goes to infinity as @xmath40 terms eq.[series proportional to powers @xmath44 finite order approximation goes to zero in ultrarelativistic limit @xmath40large amplitude behavior verified noting eq.[rel1 @xmath45 regime eq.[coordperiod ] simplifies photon bouncing box @xmath46 : @xmath47 preceding limit asymptotic boundary condition variational parameter solution zeroth order truncation series eq.[series @xmath48 assume form @xmath9 satisfies eq.[pms ] @xmath49 @xmath9 dependent on variable integration @xmath50 harmonics form @xmath51 present treat harmonics free parameters @xmath51 as @xmath52 limit @xmath9 @xmath40 even potential leading order @xmath53 large amplitude behavior @xmath54 substituting eqs.[uperiod ] wlarge1 ] limit @xmath40.[approx relation between orders free parameters @xmath55 @xmath3 equations non - linear potential system equations under - determined @xmath56 free parameters remedy factoring out @xmath57 numerator denominator eq.[wlarge1 @xmath58 large amplitude limit eq.[approx yields relation @xmath59 lowest order free parameter trigonometric average @xmath60 @xmath61 case determines @xmath62values used in @xmath63 equation @xmath64 building @xmath3 free parameters iterative computation yields integers @xmath65 free parameters by @xmath66 use values in @xmath55 determine @xmath9 by eq.[pms3 ] eq.[approx ] approximation is @xmath67 apply method to linear potential @xmath68 in eq.[coordperiod yields @xmath69 free parameters @xmath55 utilize relation eq.[wlarge1 ] @xmath70 system not under - determined ultrarelativistic limit of eq.[approx ] gives relation @xmath71 using @xmath60 determine @xmath72 substitute values into eq.[harmr ] use eq.[approx2 ] compact expression for period @xmath73 compare with exact period @xmath74 - @xmath75 @xmath76 elliptic integrals of first second kind figure shows relative error of eq.[harmperiod ] results harmonic balance @xcite homotopy third order approximations accurate by @xmath77 over @xmath16 solution is only approximation error zero at ultrarelativistic limitadvantage in resulting expression compact mathematically elementary harmonic balance homotopy lengthy require evaluation of elliptic integrals method extensive applicability second example calculate general approximation for periods of relativistic oscillators with potential @xmath78 obtain function @xmath55 derivation from eq.[coordperiod ] result is @xmath79 @xmath80 expression factored with eq.[wlarge2 ] free parameters defined by eq.[free ] approximation follows from eq.[approx2 ] result is @xmath81 evaluated geometric sum in eq.[genr ] approximations for periods of relativistic quartic ( @xmath61 ) sextic ( @xmath63 ) oscillators are @xmath82 3^4+(8+a^2 and @xmath83 ^4 + 3 a^2+a^6 - approximations for cases @xmath84 and harmonic potential fitted with numerically integrated exact results in figure relative errors in low even for non - linear case of @xmath85large values @xmath3 period jump harmonic amplitudes @xmath86 to ultrarelativistic limit @xmath87 derive general approximation periods relativistic oscillators potential @xmath88 calculation deriving general form @xmath55 factoring with eq.[wlarge2 free parameters determined by eq.[free ] eq.[approx2 ] result obtained @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath61 reduces to eq.[duffperiod ] period relativistic quartic oscillator @xmath63 approximation period relativistic particle oscillating under potential @xmath91 @xmath92[-24 a^4+(12 + 9 a^2 + 10 a^4 ) -48 a^6 + 2 a^4^2{period246 figure shows approximations cases @xmath93 @xmath94 numerically integrated exact results inset shows low relative errors increase @xmath3 treat relativistic oscillators non - linear potential @xmath2 procedure deriving general expression @xmath55 eqs.[free approx2 result @xmath95}{a^{m-1}\sqrt{[4m+a^{2m}(1-\lambda_{2 m\frac{3}{2}+{\pi^2 - 6}{4}[1-(\frac{\pi^2 - 4}^2})^{m-2 }\label{gent3}\end{aligned} setting @xmath61 equation approximation period relativistic oscillator potential @xmath96 @xmath97 approximations @xmath98 @xmath99 results figure fig4 method infinities both regimes oscillation period modification pms - based non - perturbative method economical procedure calculating analytic expressions period oscillating relativistic particle polynomial potentials form non - linear guarantees accuracy ultrarelativistic limit | 0.498216 | 3,177 | 1,685 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,019 | three - dimensional numerical simulations of solar surface magnetoconvection using realistic model physics are conducted .
the thermal structure of convective motions into the upper radiative layers of the photosphere , the main scales of convective cells and the penetration depths of convection are investigated .
we take part of the solar photosphere with size of @xmath0 mm in horizontal direction and by depth 20 mm from level of the visible solar surface .
we use a realistic initial model of the sun and apply equation of state and opacities of stellar matter .
the equations of fully compressible radiation magnetohydrodynamics with dynamical viscosity and gravity are solved .
we apply : 1 ) conservative tvd difference scheme for the magnetohydrodynamics , 2 ) the diffusion approximation for the radiative transfer , 3 ) dynamical viscosity from subgrid scale modeling . in simulation
we take uniform two - dimesional grid in gorizontal plane and nonuniform grid in vertical direction with number of cells @xmath1 .
we use 512 processors with distributed memory multiprocessors on supercomputer mvs-100k in the joint computational centre of the russian academy of sciences . | the convection near solar surface develops on the different space and time scales .
numerical simulation provides useful information about evolution of convective structures and helps to construct consistent models of the physical processes underlying of observed solar phenomena .
we conduct an investigation of the temporal evolution and growth of convective modes on scales supergranulation in a three - dimensional computational box with imposed initially uniform weak magnetic field . in previous work by the author [ @xcite ] it was shown that collective motions of small convective cells of granulation expels weak magnetic field on the edges cells at mesogranular scales .
average size of such cells is 15 - 20 mm and the lifetime is 8 - 10 solar hours . in article [ @xcite ]
it was suggested that development of large spatial and long temporal mesogranular and supergranular scales naturally arise as result the collective advective interaction of many small - scale and short - lived granular plumes .
simulation of solar photosphere convection [ @xcite ] in a computational domain of size 48 mm in horizontal plane and 20 mm in depth showed that the sizes of convective cells increase with depth .
the purpose of this work is to investigate the effect magnetic field on the development of convection on scale supergranulation in a region of size 60 mm in the horizontal plane and 20 mm in depth .
as initial state we take the distribution of the main thermodynamic variables with radius from the standard solar model [ @xcite ] with parameters @xmath2 , where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are hydrogen and helium abundances by mass , and @xmath5 is the ratio of mixing length to pressure scale height in the convection region .
we used the opal opacity tables and the equation of state for solar matter [ @xcite ] .
the compressible nonideal magnetohydrodynamics equations are solved : @xmath6 @xmath7 = \rho \vec g + \nabla \cdot \hat \tau\ ] ] @xmath8 = \frac { 1}{4 \pi}\nabla \cdot \left(\vec b \times \eta \nabla \times \vec b\right)\nonumber \\ + \nabla \cdot \left(\vec v \cdot \hat
\tau \right ) + \rho \left(\vec g \cdot \vec v \right ) + q_{rad}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath9 here @xmath10 is the density , @xmath11 is the pressure , @xmath12 is vector of the velocity , @xmath13 is vector of the magnetic field , @xmath14 is vector of the gravitation , @xmath15 is the total energy , @xmath16 is the energy transferred by radiation and @xmath17 is the viscous stress tensor .
the influence of small scales on large scale flows was evaluated in terms of viscous stress tensor and the rate of dissipation was defined from buoyancy and shear production terms [ @xcite ] .
the evolution of all variables in time was found using an explicit tvd[total variation diminishing ] conservative difference scheme ( [ @xcite ] ) @xmath18 where @xmath19 and the operator @xmath20 is @xmath21 the flux along each direction was defined by the local - characteristic method as @xmath22 \ .\ ] ] @xmath23 is the matrix whose columns are right eigenvectors of @xmath24 evaluated as a generalized roe average of @xmath25 and @xmath26 for real gases .
@xmath27 is the matrix of numerical dissipation .
the term @xmath28 represents the effect of gravitational forces and radiation .
time step integration is by third - order runge - kutta method [ @xcite ] .
this scheme is second - order in space and time .
central differences were used for the viscous term , and the diffusion approximation was applied for the radiative term in the energy equation .
we used a uniform grid in the @xmath29 and @xmath30 directions and a nonuniform grid in the vertical @xmath31 direction .
periodic boundary conditions were used in the horizontal directions and the top and bottom boundary conditions were choosen to be @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 that is , reflection for the @xmath35 component of velocity , outflow for the @xmath29 and @xmath30 components .
the pressure and density were derived from the solution of the hydrostatic equation , using the equation of state by constant value of the internal energy .
we imposed initially the homogeneuos vertical magnetic field with strength of 50 g. for the magnetic diffusivity we take constant value @xmath36@xmath37sec@xmath38 .
we carried out calculations in the region of @xmath39 mm on the grid with @xmath1 cells during of 24 solar hours . on the figures 1 - 3
the results of the mhd numerical simulation of development of the convection in the horizontal plane near solar surface are presented .
we find that the magnetic field concentrates in extended regions similar sunspot with diameter about 5 mm and in thin sheets on the boundary of supergranular cells . in these regions
we reveal the increase of strength of the magnetic field to values 700 - 800 g , the decrease of temperature on few thousand kelvin , the small values of the vertical component of velocity in average about 0.05 km / sec and as result full absence of the convective motion .
the magnetic pressure prevents the inflow of the material from outside of sunspot and thus the transfer of radiation energy is suppressed . inside of supergranular cell
the value of vertical component of the magnetic field is very small about 1 g and less . diverging convective flows from the center supergranular expels weak magnetic field to the edges of convective cell .
an average size of the supergranular cells is 20 - 30 mm .
a material moves from the center of supergranular with the velocity of about 1 - 1.5 km / sec .
the maximum value of the magnetic field in the computational domain is 2000 g. inside of supergranular we have a typical picture of evolution of convection on the scale of granulation with average sizes of the cells about 1.5 mm and with lifetime about 4 - 5 minutes [ @xcite ] .
here we see wider upflows of warm , low density , and entropy neutral matter and downflows of cold , converging into filamentary structures , dense material .
we observe a continuous picture of formation and destruction of granules . the granules with highest pressure grow and push matter against neighboring granules , that then shrink and disappear .
ascending flow increases the pressure in the center of granule and upflowing fluids decelerates motion .
this process reduces heat transport to surface and allows the material above the granule to cool , become denser , and by action of gravity to move down .
we observe a formation of new cold intergranule lane splitting the original granule .
from figure 4 we can see properties of turbulent convection on depth 0 - 4 mm . in this region
the cold blobs of the matter moves down by maximum of velocity of about 4 km / sec and the mach number m=0.6 .
the downdrafts has different and very complicate vertical structure .
one part of the downdrafts travels on small distance from the surface and becomes weak enough to be broken up by the surrounding fluid motion .
another part of the downdrafts conserves a motion with high velocity and moves on the distance about 6 mm .
we observe that different nature of such behavior is provided by the initial conditions of downdrafts formation .
there are places on solar surface where the material moves from different sides to one point and here we find powerful vorticity motions of matter . due to action of strong compressibility effects
we observe quick output of internal energy and formation of downdrafts with maximum of values of the vertical velocity .
we detect extended regions with size about 5 mm in a diameter where turbulent convection is fully disappeared . on the depthes from 5 mm to 8 mm we reveal more quiet character of the convective flow than in the turbulent zone .
below 8 mm we see clearly the separate large scale density fluctuations and the streaming flow of the material which similar to jets with the largest value of the average velocity equal to 1 km / sec . in these places
the magnetic field has value about 300 g. besides we find on depthes bigger than 10 mm the separate regions of localization of the huge magnetic energy with values of magnetic field in range from 800 to 1000 g ( fig.5 ) .
distances between these places with strong concentration of the magnetic field is comparable with scales development of the local solar supergranulation .
the convective motion in different parts of photosphere leads to continuous changes of topology of the magnetic field .
we find inside of the supergranular cell many magnetic loops with big negative values of the vertical component of the magnetic field . | convection near solar surface develops different space time scales numerical simulation provides information evolution convective structures models physical processes solar phenomena investigation temporal evolution growth convective modes on supergranulation three - dimensional computational box uniform weak magnetic field motions small convective cells magnetic field mesogranular scales average size 15 - 20 mm lifetime 8 - 10 solar hours development large spatial long temporal mesogranular supergranular scales arise advective interaction small - scale short - granular plumes simulation solar photosphere convection 48 mm 20 mm showed sizes convective cells increase with depth purpose investigate effect magnetic field on development convection on scale supergranulation region size 60 mm 20 mm depth initial state distribution main thermodynamic variables with radius standard solar model parameters @xmath2 hydrogen helium abundances mass ratio mixing length to pressure scale height convection region used opal opacity tables equation of state for solar mattercompressible nonideal magnetohydrodynamics equations solved : @xmath6 @xmath7 = \rho \vec g + \nabla \cdot \hat \tau @xmath8 = \frac { 1}{4 \pi}\nabla \cdot b\nonumber + \nabla v ) + \rho\vec g v\right ) + q_{rad}{aligned} @xmath9 @xmath10 density pressure velocity magnetic field gravitation total energy energy transferred radiation viscous stress tensor influence small scales large scale flows evaluated viscous stress tensor rate dissipation defined buoyancy shear production terms evolution variables in time tvd[total variation diminishing conservative difference scheme @xmath18 @xmath19 flux each direction defined local - characteristic method @xmath22 @xmath23 matrix columns eigenvectors @xmath24 generalized average @xmath25 @xmath26 real gases @xmath27 matrix numerical dissipation @xmath28 effect gravitational forces radiationtime step integration third - order runge - kutta method scheme second - order space time central differences viscous term diffusion approximation radiative term energy equation uniform grid @xmath29 @xmath30 directions nonuniform vertical @xmath31 direction periodic boundary conditions horizontal directions top bottom boundary conditions @xmath32 @xmath33 reflection @xmath35 velocity outflow @xmath29 @xmath30 pressure density derived hydrostatic equation equation state constant value internal energy imposed vertical magnetic field strength 50 g magnetic diffusivity constant value @xmath36@xmath38 calculations region @xmath39 mm grid @xmath1 cells 24 solar hours figures 1 - 3 results numerical simulation convection horizontal plane solar surface magnetic field concentrates extended regions sunspot diameter 5 mm thin sheets boundary supergranular cells increase strength 700 - 800 g decrease temperature few thousand kelvin small values vertical velocity 0.05 km / sec full absence convective motion magnetic pressure prevents inflow material sunspot transfer radiation energy suppressed inside supergranular cell vertical component magnetic field small 1 g lessdiverging convective flows from supergranular expels magnetic field to edges average size supergranular cells 20 - 30 mm material moves velocity 1 - 1.5 km / sec maximum magnetic field 2000 g inside supergranular typical picture evolution of convection average sizes cells 1.5 mm lifetime 4 - 5 minutes upflows of warm low density neutral matter downflows cold dense material continuous formation destruction of granules granules with highest pressure grow push matter against granules shrink disappear ascending flow increases pressure upflowing fluids decelerates motion reduces heat transport allows material above to cool become denser move down formation new cold intergranule lane splitting original granule figure 4 turbulent convection on depth 0 - 4 mm cold blobs down maximum velocity 4 km / sec mach number m=0.6 downdrafts vertical structure one part travels small distance from surface weak fluid motion another part conserves motion high velocity moves distance 6 mm different nature behavior initial conditions downdrafts formation places on solar surface material moves from different sides to one point powerful vorticity motionsstrong compressibility effects observe quick output internal energy formation downdrafts maximum vertical velocity detect extended regions 5 mm turbulent convection disappeared depthes 5 mm to 8 mm quiet character convective flow turbulent zone below 8 mm large scale density fluctuations streaming flow material similar jets average velocity 1 km / sec magnetic field 300 g depthes 10 mm separate regions huge magnetic energy values 800 to 1000 g ( fig.5 ) distances places strong concentration magnetic field comparable with local solar supergranulation convective motion leads continuous changes topology magnetic field inside supergranular cell magnetic loops big negative values vertical component magnetic field | 0.31401 | 1,943 | 964 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,021 | the spread of sexually transmitted diseases ( _ e.g .
chlamydia , syphilis , gonorrhea , hiv _ ) across populations is a major concern for scientists and health agencies . in this context
, both data collection on sexual contact networks and the modeling of disease spreading , are intensively contributing to the search for effective immunization policies . here , the spreading of sexually transmitted diseases on bipartite scale - free graphs , representing heterosexual contact networks , is considered .
we analytically derive the expression for the epidemic threshold and its dependence with the system size in finite populations .
we show that the epidemic outbreak in bipartite populations , with number of sexual partners distributed as in empirical observations from national sex surveys , takes place for larger spreading rates than for the case in which the bipartite nature of the network is not taken into account .
numerical simulations confirm the validity of the theoretical results .
our findings indicate that the restriction to crossed infections between the two classes of individuals ( males and females ) has to be taken into account in the design of efficient immunization strategies for sexually transmitted diseases .
disease spreading has been the subject of intense research since long time ago @xcite .
on the one hand , epidemiologists have developed mathematical models that can be used as a guide to understanding how an epidemic spreads and to design immunization and vaccination policies @xcite .
on the other hand , data collections have provided information on the local patterns of relationships in a population . in particular , persons who may have come into contact with an infectious individual
are identified and diagnosed , making it possible to contact - trace the way the epidemic spreads , and to validate the mathematical models . however , up to a few years ago , some of the assumptions at the basis of the theoretical models were difficult to test .
this is the case , for instance , of the complete network of contacts -the backbone through which the diseases are transmitted . with the advent of modern society ,
fast transportation systems have changed human habits , and some diseases that just a few years ago would have produced local outbreaks , are nowadays a global threat for public health systems .
a recent example is given by the severe acute respiratory syndrome ( sars ) , that spread very fast from asia to north america a few years ago @xcite . therefore , it is of utmost importance to carefully take into account as much details as possible of the structural properties of the network on which the infection dynamics occurs .
strikingly , a large number of statistical properties have been found to be common in the topology of real - world social , biological and technological networks @xcite .
of particular relevance because of its ubiquity in nature , is the class of complex networks referred to as scale - free ( sf ) networks . in sf networks ,
the number of contacts or connections of a node with other nodes in the system , the degree ( or connectivity ) @xmath0 , follows a power law distribution , @xmath1 .
recent studies have shown the importance of the sf topology on the dynamics and function of the system under study @xcite .
for instance , sf networks are very robust to random failures , but at the same time extremely fragile to targeted attacks of the highly connected nodes @xcite . in the context of disease spreading , sf contact networks lead to a vanishing epidemic threshold in the limit of infinite population when @xmath2 @xcite .
this is because the exponent @xmath3 is directly related to the first and second moment of the degree distribution , @xmath4 and @xmath5 , and the ratio @xmath6 determines the epidemic threshold above which the outbreak occurs .
when @xmath7 , @xmath4 is finite while @xmath5 goes to infinity , that is , the transmission probability required for the infection to spread goes to zero .
conversely , when @xmath8 , there is a finite threshold and the epidemic survives only when the spreading rate is above a certain critical value .
the concept of a critical epidemic threshold is central in epidemiology .
its absence in sf networks with @xmath7 has a number of important implications in terms of prevention policies : if diseases can spread and persist even in the case of vanishingly small transmission probabilities , then prevention campaigns where individuals are randomly chosen for vaccination are not much effective @xcite .
our knowledge of the mechanisms involved in disease spreading as well as on the relation between the network structure and the dynamical patterns of the spreading process has improved in the last several years @xcite .
current approaches are either individual - based simulations @xcite or metapopulation models where network simulations are carried out through a detailed stratification of the population and infection dynamics @xcite . in the particular case of sexually transmitted diseases ( stds ) , infections occur within the unique context of sexual encounters , and the network of contacts @xcite is a critical ingredient of any theoretical framework . unfortunately , ascertaining complete sexual contact networks in significatively large populations is extremely difficult .
however , here we show that it is indeed possible to make use of known global statistical features to generate more accurate predictions of the critical epidemic threshold for stds . | data from national sex surveys @xcite provide quantitative information on the number of sexual partners , the degree @xmath0 , of an individual . usually , surveys involve a random sample of the population stratified by age , economical and cultural level , occupation , marital status , etc .
the respondents are asked to provide information on sexual attitudes such as the number of sex partners they have had in the last 12 months or in their entire life .
although in most cases the response rate is relatively small , the information gathered is statistically significant and global features of sexual contact patterns can be extracted . in particular
, it turns out that the number of heterosexual partners reported from different populations is well described by power - law sf distributions .
table [ tab : scn ] summarizes the main results of surveys conducted in sweden , united kingdom , zimbabwe and burkina faso @xcite . the first thing to notice is the gender - specific difference in the number of sexual acquaintances @xcite .
this is manifested by the existence of two different exponents in the sf degree distributions , one for males ( @xmath9 ) and one for females ( @xmath10 ) .
interestingly enough , the predominant case in table [ tab : scn ] , no matter whether data refers to time frames of 12 months or to entire life , consists of one exponent being smaller and the other larger than 3 .
this is certainly a borderline case that requires further investigation on the value of the epidemic threshold .
the differences found in the two exponents @xmath10 and @xmath9 have a further implication for real data and mathematical modeling . in an exhaustive survey , able to reproduce the whole network of sexual contacts , the total number of female partners reported by men should equal the total number of male sexual partners reported by women .
mathematically , this means that the number of links ending at population @xmath11 ( of size @xmath12 ) equals the number of links ending at population @xmath13 ( of size @xmath14 ) , which translates into the following closure relation : @xmath15 assuming that the degree distributions for the two sets are truly scale - free , then @xmath16 , with the symbol @xmath17 standing for the gender @xmath18 , and @xmath19 being the minimum degree .
moreover , if @xmath20 and @xmath21 for any @xmath17 , eq .
( [ closure ] ) gives the relation between the two population sizes as @xmath22 which implies that the less heterogeneous ( in degree ) population must be larger than the other one .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] although both epidemic thresholds , @xmath23 and @xmath24 , tend to zero as the population goes to infinity , the scaling relations , @xmath25 and @xmath26 , are characterized by two different exponents , @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
table [ tab : exp ] reports the expression of these two exponents as a function of @xmath10 and @xmath9 , showing that @xmath28 is always smaller than @xmath27 .
in particular , for the most common case ( see table [ tab : scn ] ) , i.e. when one degree distribution exponent is in the range @xmath292,3]$ ] , and the other one is larger than @xmath30 , the value of @xmath28 found for bipartite networks is two times smaller than @xmath27 . as a consequence , the results show that in finite bipartite populations the onset of the epidemic takes place at larger values of the spreading rate .
in other words , it could be the case that for a given transmission probability , in the unipartite representation shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( b ) the epidemic would have survived infecting a fraction of the population , while when only crossed infections are allowed , as in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( a ) , the same disease would not have produced an endemic state .
moreover , the difference between the epidemic thresholds predicted by the two approaches increases with the system size .
this dependency is shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] , where we have reported , as a function of the system size , the critical thresholds obtained by numerically solving eqs .
( [ threshold ] ) and ( [ threshold2 ] ) with the values of @xmath9 and @xmath10 found for the lifetime distribution of sexual partners in sweden @xcite and u.k @xcite .
to check the validity of the analytical arguments and also to explore the dynamics of the disease above the epidemic threshold , we have conducted extensive numerical simulations of the sis model in bipartite and unipartite computer - generated networks .
bipartite and unipartite graphs of a given size are built up ( see methods section ) having the same degree distributions , @xmath31 and @xmath32 , and thus they only differ in the way the nodes are linked .
a fraction of infected individuals is initially randomly placed on the network and the sis dynamics is evolved : at each time step susceptible individuals get infected with probability @xmath33 if they are connected to an infectious one , and get recovered with probability @xmath34 ( hence , the effective transmission probability is @xmath35 ) .
after a transient time , the system reaches a stationary state where the total prevalence of the disease , @xmath36 , is measured ( see methods ) .
the results are finally averaged over different initial conditions and network realizations .
[ fig3 ] shows the fraction of infected individuals as a function of @xmath37 for several system sizes and for the bipartite ( ( a ) and ( b ) ) and unipartite ( ( c ) and ( d ) ) graphs . in this figure
, the infection probability @xmath38 has been rescaled by the theoretical value @xmath39 given by eq .
( [ threshold ] ) .
the purpose of the rescaling is twofold .
first it allows to check the validity of the theoretical predictions and , at the same time , it provides a clear comparison of the results obtained for bipartite networks with those obtained for the unipartite case .
again we have used the values of @xmath9 and @xmath10 extracted from the lifetime number of sexual partners reported for sweden and u.k .
@xcite . fig .
[ fig3 ] indicates that the analytical solution , eq .
( [ threshold ] ) , is in good agreement with the simulation results for the two - gender model formulation .
conversely when the bipartite nature of the underlying graph is not taken into account , the epidemic threshold is underestimated , being @xmath40 smaller than @xmath41 .
in addition to this , the error in the estimation grows as the population size increases , in agreement with our theoretical predictions .
the inclusion of the bipartite nature of contact networks to describe crossed infections in the spread of stds in heterosexual populations is seen to affect strongly the epidemic outbreak and leads to an increase of the epidemic threshold .
our results show that , even in the cases when the epidemic threshold vanishes in the infinite network size limit , the epidemic incidence in finite populations is less dramatic than actually expected for unipartite scale - free networks .
the results also point out that the larger the population , the greater the gap between the epidemic thresholds predicted by the two models , therefore highlighting the need to accurately take into account all the available information on how heterosexual contact networks look like .
our results also have important consequences for the design and refinement of efficient degree - based immunization strategies aimed at reducing the spread of stds .
in particular , they pose new questions on how such strategies have to be modified when the interactions are further compartmentalized by gender and only crossed infections are allowed .
we finally stress that the present approach is generalizable to other models for disease spreading ( _ e.g. _ the `` _ susceptible - infected - removed _ '' model ) and other processes where crossed infection in bipartite networks is the mechanism at work .
synthetic bipartite networks construction starts by fixing the number of males , @xmath42 and the two exponents @xmath9 and @xmath10 of the power - law degree distributions corresponding to males and females respectively .
the first stage consists of assigning the connectivity @xmath43 ( @xmath44, ... ,@xmath12 ) to each member of the male population by generating @xmath45 random numbers with probability distribution @xmath46 ( @xmath47 , with @xmath48 ) .
the sum of these @xmath45 random numbers fixes the number of links @xmath49 of the network .
the next step is to construct the female population by means of an iterative process . for this purpose
we progressively add female individuals with a randomly assigned degree following the distribution @xmath50 ( @xmath51 , with @xmath48 ) .
female nodes are incorporated until the total female connectivity reaches the number of male edges , @xmath52 . in this way one
sets the total number of females @xmath14 .
once the two sets of @xmath12 males and @xmath14 females with their corresponding connectivities are constructed each one of the @xmath49 male edges is randomly linked to one of the available female edges avoiding multiple connections .
finally those few female edges that did not receive a male link in the last stage are removed and the connectedness of the resulting network is checked .
synthetic unipartite networks has been constructed in two ways .
the simplest one consists of taking the two sets of @xmath12 males and @xmath14 females constructed for the bipartite network and apply a rewiring process to the entire population , _ i.e. _ allowing links between individuals of the same sex . in the second method , a set of @xmath53 individuals whose connectivities
are randomly assigned following the degree distribution @xmath54 is generated before applying a wiring process between all pairs of edges . in both methods the wiring process avoids multiple and self connections and those isolated edges that remain at the end of the network construction are removed .
the connectedness of the networks is also checked .
montecarlo simulations of sis dynamics are performed using networks of sizes ranging from @xmath55 to @xmath56 .
the initial fraction of infected nodes is set to @xmath57 of the network size .
the sis dynamics is initially evolved for a time typically of @xmath58 time - steps and after this transient the system is further evolved over consecutive time windows of @xmath59 steps . in these time windows
we monitor the mean value of the number of infected individuals , @xmath60 .
the steady state is reached if the absolute difference between the average number of infected individuals of two consecutive time windows is less than @xmath61 .
we thank k.t.d .
eames and j.m .
read for their useful suggestions .
is supported by mec through the ramn y cajal program .
this work has been partially supported by the spanish dgicyt projects fis2006 - 12781-c02 - 01 and fis2005 - 00337 , and by the italian to61 infn project .
fenton , k. a. , korovessis , c. , johnson , a. m. , mccadden , a. , mcmanus , s. , wellings , k. , mercer , c. h. , carder , c. , copas , a. j. , nanchahal , k. , macdowall , w. , ridgway , g. , field , j. & erens , b. ( 2001 ) _ the lancet _ * 358 * , 1851 - 1854 . | national sex surveys provide information on number of sexual partners degree @xmath0 individual surveys involve random sample population stratified by age economical cultural level occupation marital status respondents asked provide information on sexual attitudes number of sex partners last 12 months or entire life response rate small information gathered statistically significant global features of sexual contact patterns be extracted number of heterosexual partners reported from different populations described by power - law sf distributions table summarizes results of surveys in sweden united kingdom zimbabwe burkina faso gender - specific difference in number of sexual acquaintances manifested by two different exponents in sf degree distributions one for males and females predominant case in one exponent smaller other larger than 3 requires further investigation differences in exponents @xmath10 and @xmath9 for real data mathematical modeling in exhaustive survey total number of female partners reported by men should equal total number male sexual partners reported by womenmathematically links ending at population @xmath11 @xmath12 ) equals at population @xmath13 @xmath14 ) translates into closure relation : @xmath15 degree distributions scale - free @xmath16 @xmath17 for gender @xmath18 @xmath19 minimum degree @xmath20 and @xmath21 for @xmath17 relation between two population sizes as @xmath22 implies less heterogeneous population larger epidemic thresholds @xmath23 and @xmath24 tend to zero as population goes to infinity scaling relations @xmath25 and @xmath26 characterized by two exponents @xmath27 and @xmath28 table reports expression exponents function of @xmath10 and @xmath9 @xmath28 smaller than @xmath27 common case one degree distribution exponent in range @xmath292,3 other larger than @xmath30 value of @xmath28 for bipartite networks two times smaller than @xmath27 results show in finite bipartite populations onset epidemic at larger values of spreading rate given transmission probability unipartite representation fig fig1 ] ( b ) epidemic survived infecting fraction population crossed infections allowed fig a same disease produced endemic state difference between epidemic thresholds approaches increases with system size dependency shown in fig . fig2 ] reported system size critical thresholds by solving eqs . threshold ] ) threshold2 ] ) with values @xmath9 @xmath10 for lifetime distribution sexual partners in sweden u.k check validity analytical arguments explore dynamics disease above epidemic threshold conducted numerical simulations sis model in bipartite unipartite computer - generated networks graphs size same degree distributions @xmath31 @xmath32 differ in nodes linked fraction of infected individuals randomly placed on network sis dynamics evolved susceptible individuals infected with probability @xmath33 recovered with probability @xmath34 effective transmission probability @xmath35 ) after system reaches stationary state total prevalence disease @xmath36 measured results averaged over initial conditions network realizationsfig3 ] shows fraction infected individuals function of @xmath37 for system sizes bipartite unipartite graphs infection probability @xmath38 rescaled by theoretical value @xmath39 by eq . ( [ threshold ] ) purpose rescaling validity theoretical predictions comparison of results for bipartite networks with unipartite case used values of @xmath9 and @xmath10 extracted from lifetime sexual partners for sweden u.k . @xcite indicates analytical solution eq . ( [ threshold ] ) with simulation results for two - gender model formulation bipartite nature graph not epidemic threshold underestimated @xmath40 smaller than @xmath41 error in estimation grows as population size increases inclusion bipartite nature contact networks crossed infections in spread stds in heterosexual populations epidemic outbreak leads to epidemic threshold results show epidemic threshold vanishes in infinite network size limit epidemic incidence in finite populations less dramatic than for unipartite scale - free networks larger population greater gap between epidemic thresholds predicted models need to information on heterosexual contact networksresults consequences for design degree - based immunization strategies reducing spread stds pose new questions on strategies when interactions compartmentalized by gender crossed infections allowed present approach generalizable to other models for disease spreading susceptible - infected - removed model crossed infection in bipartite networks synthetic bipartite networks construction starts fixing number of males @xmath42 exponents @xmath9 @xmath10 of power - law degree distributions first stage assigning connectivity @xmath43 to each member male population by generating @xmath45 random numbers with probability distribution @xmath46 sum numbers fixes number of links @xmath49 of network next step female population iterative process progressively add female individuals with randomly assigned degree following distribution @xmath50 female nodes incorporated until total female connectivity reaches number male edges @xmath52 sets total number of females @xmath14 two sets females constructed @xmath49 male edges randomly linked to female edges avoiding multiple connections female edges link removed connectedness network checked synthetic unipartite networks constructed in two wayssimplest two sets @xmath12 males and @xmath14 females for bipartite network rewiring to entire population allowing links between same sex second method @xmath53 individuals connectivities randomly assigned degree distribution @xmath54 generated before wiring between edges wiring avoids multiple connections isolated edges removed connectedness checked montecarlo simulations sis dynamics using networks sizes @xmath55 to @xmath56 initial fraction infected nodes set to @xmath57 network size sis dynamics evolved for @xmath58 time - steps evolved over time windows @xmath59 steps monitor mean number infected individuals @xmath60 steady state reached if difference average number infected individuals two time windows less than @xmath61 thank k.t.d . eames j.m . read for suggestions supported by mec ramn y cajal program partially supported by spanish dgicyt projects fis2006 - 12781-c02 - 01 fis2005 - 00337 italian to61 infn project fenton korovessis johnson mccadden mcmanus wellings mercer carder copas nanchahal macdowallridgway g field j. erens 2001 ) lancet 358 1851 - 1854 | 0.429341 | 2,486 | 1,239 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,025 | we compare constraints on the gluon polarization in the nucleon obtained in next to leading order global qcd fits to polarized deep inelastic scattering data with those coming from observables more directly linked to the gluon polarization , such as the double spin asymmetry measured by phenix at rhic , and high-@xmath0 hadron production studied by compass at cern . | the extent to which gluons are polarized in the nucleon , and consequently the origin of the nucleon spin , has persisted as an elusive question for almost two decades in spite of strenuous experimental efforts and theoretical activity @xcite .
although the spin dependent gluon density in principle can be sized in inclusive deep inelastic scattering measurements , mainly through the scale dependence of the measured asymmetries , this dependence is rather mild in the kinematical range accessed by experiments , and conclusions about it are also veiled by our ignorance regarding the polarization of the other partonic species , which also contribute to the scale dependence , specially that of sea quarks .
therefore , even in the most ambitious scenario , inclusive deep inelastic scattering data can at most suggest mild constraints on the gluon polarization . in a recent article @xcite
, we have shown that the enduring efforts to measure less inclusive observables in deep inelastic scattering have finally begun to yield , allowing combined next to leading order global qcd fits to inclusive and semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering data where sea quarks and gluons are much more definitely constrained . in the mean time , independent measurements of other less inclusive observables , such as pion production in polarized proton - proton collisions @xcite , and high transverse momentum hadron pair production in deep inelastic scattering have begun to provide more direct assessments of the gluon polarization with competing precision @xcite .
it is therefore of great interest to compare the gluon polarization estimates coming from both the global analysis of deep inelastic scattering data and from the more direct measurements . in the following
we perform such comparison and we find that although preliminary direct measurements still have a moderate impact in the fits , there is a remarkable agreement and complementarity between both approaches , what encourage us to incorporate the forthcoming data in future global analysis .
in the case of inclusive and semi - inclusive polarized deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) , the next to leading order ( nlo ) qcd framework required to compute the respective observables have been available for some time @xcite , and indeed recent global analyses have demonstrated both the relevance of these corrections and also the non negligible impact of most recent semi - inclusive data @xcite .
specifically , in reference @xcite it has been found that the best global qcd fits to combined dis data constrain the gluon polarization to be moderately positive with a first moment of this density @xmath1 of @xmath2 at @xmath3 with an uncertainty range given by @xmath4 $ ] for a one - unit increase in @xmath5 and by @xmath6 $ ] allowing a more conservative @xmath7 variation of @xmath5 . in these constraints , both the requirement of positivity of the polarized parton densities relative to a modern set of unpolarized parton densities @xcite , and the correlation between gluon and sea quark polarization , are found to be crucial . fits with a wide variation in the gluon polarization reproduce inclusive data equally well , however they are clearly differentiated because of their sea quark polarization by semi - inclusive data .
the cross section for single inclusive large @xmath0 pion production in longitudinally polarized proton - proton collisions , which is right now being measured at brookhaven national laboratory relativistiv heavy ion collider ( bnl rhic ) @xcite have also been computed at nlo accuracy , and have been found to be significantly dependent on @xmath8 @xcite .
recently , the phenix collaboration has presented preliminary results with considerably reduced errors @xcite which clearly disfavors scenarios with large gluon polarization and are in nice agreement with estimates of updated polarized fits . in figure
[ deltag]a we show the expectation for the double spin asymmetry computed with the best fit of reference @xcite , together with the data reported by phenix @xcite .
we also plot the uncertainty band associated to a @xmath9 variation .
@xcite compared with the estimate coming from the the nlo fit of reference @xcite and the uncertainty band allowing @xmath9 ; ( b ) the same but for estimates for @xmath10 from @xcite .
[ deltag],title="fig:",width=336 ] @xcite compared with the estimate coming from the the nlo fit of reference @xcite and the uncertainty band allowing @xmath9 ;
( b ) the same but for estimates for @xmath10 from @xcite .
[ deltag],title="fig:",width=336 ] the @xmath5 for phenix data obtained with the best fit of reference @xcite , which is previous to the latest set of phenix data , and computed including the 40% scaling uncertainty in the nondiagonal covariance matrix , results to be @xmath11 , for @xmath12 data points , which is well within the @xmath13 range expected for a given subset of data in global fit and therefore should be considered as consistent .
the value for @xmath5 is comparable to the one obtained ( @xmath14 ) in a recent fit @xcite to both inclusive dis data and the phenix measurement , although not including the scaling error in the computation .
similar agreement is found comparing the expectation of the fit for @xmath15 at @xmath16 gev@xmath17 against preliminary data from compass @xcite , and previous measurements @xcite , as shown in figure [ deltag]b . in this case
we include both the leading order ( lo ) and the nlo expectation because the reported values for @xmath15 correspond to a lo extraction improved with montecarlo higher order corrections .
we include in the plot the uncertainty band coming from a 2% variation in @xmath5 , plus that coming from varying @xmath18 up to @xmath19 gev@xmath17 , what again highlights the nice consistency between independent data set and the frameworks implemented for the corresponding analyses .
further insight on the interplay between dis data and that coming from phenix can be obtained analyzing the profile of @xmath5 function for the different subsets of data in a combined fit , against the range of variation of the net gluon polarization , as it was done in @xcite . in figure [ profile ] we show the profile of the total @xmath5 of a global fit to inclusive and semi - inclusive data along the lines of that of reference @xcite but also including phenix data as a solid line .
the curve has similar shape to the one found in @xcite but shifted upwards between eleven and thirteen units , which is essentially the partial contribution of @xmath20 to @xmath5 . in order to see the relevance of @xmath20 data , this last contribution
is also plotted as a dashed - dotted line with an offset 430.91 units , which the partial contribution of dis data @xmath21@xmath22 for the best fit .
notice the partial contribution of @xmath20 is almost flat around the minimum of @xmath5 and reaches its own minimum for slightly lower values of @xmath23 but within the one - unit variation of @xmath5 , what highlights the consistency between both data sets . of different sets of data against the gluon net polarization .
[ profile],width=432 ] in figure [ profile ] we have plotted also the profile obtained for dis data only in @xcite as a dashed line , with an offset given by the partial contribution of @xmath20 at its minimun @xmath21@xmath24 , in order to see the net effects on the fit of phenix data . in table [ tab : table1 ] we show the partial contributions to @xmath5 at both minima .
.[tab : table1 ] partial contributions to @xmath5 values and first moment of @xmath8 at @xmath25 gev@xmath17 [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] clearly , these effects are almost imperceptible around the minimum but can be noticed for @xmath5@xmath26 variations between the one - unit and the @xmath7 increase .
close to the minimum of @xmath5 , the decrease of @xmath5@xmath24 for decreasing @xmath23 is overpowered by the increase of @xmath5@xmath22 and consequently , the position of the minimum remains that found for dis data .
given the large number of dis data included in the fit ( 478 ) compared to the rather limited set of @xmath20 available at present , the small impact in the fit is not surprising , nevertheless the consistency shown , and the possibility of increasing considerably the statistics in the future is encouraging .
we have compared the constraints on the gluon polarization in the nucleon obtained in next to leading order global qcd fits to polarized deep inelastic scattering data with those coming the double spin asymmetry measured by phenix at rhic .
although the relative statistical weight of @xmath20 data in a global nlo fit including also dis data is rather limited , we find a remarkable agreement and moderate improvement when combining both data sets . in the case of other direct measurements such as high-@xmath0 hadron production studied by compass at cern , the lack of a nlo framework for the computation of the corresponding asymmetries does not allow to include them yet in a combined nlo global analysis
however we find preliminary agreement which hopefully will be checked at nlo accuracy in the near future .
we warmly acknowledge daniel de florian for comments and suggestions and y. fukao for discussions relative to phenix data .
b. lampe and e. reya , phys . rep .
332 , 1 ( 2000 ) ; + e. leader et al . , phys , rep . 261 , 1 ( 1995 ) .
d. de florian , g. a. navarro and r. sassot , _ phys .
d _ * 71 * , 094018 ( 2005 ) .
collaboration , k. boyle , talk given at the xviith particles and nuclei international conference ( panic05 ) , http://www.panic05.lanl.gov/ e. s. ageev _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 633 * , 25 ( 2006 ) .
s. procureur , arxiv : hep - ex/0605043 .
a. airapetian _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 84 * , 2584 ( 2000 ) .
b. adeva _ et al .
_ , phys .
d * 70 * , 012002 ( 2004 ) .
r. mertig , w. l. van neerven , z.phys.*c70 * , 637,(1996 ) ; w. vogelsang , phys.rev.*d54 * , 2023 , ( 1996 ) .
d. de florian , c. a. garcia canal and r. sassot , nucl .
b * 470 * , 195 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9510262 ] .
d. de florian and r. sassot , phys .
d * 62 * , 094025 ( 2000 ) .
b. jger , a. schafer , m. stratmann and w. vogelsang , phys . rev .
d * 67 * , 054005 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0211007 ] .
d. de florian , phys .
d * 67 * , 054004 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0210442 ] .
a. d. martin et al . , _ eur .
j. c _ * 28 * 455 ( 2003 ) .
s. s. adler _ et al .
_ [ phenix collaboration ] , phys .
* 93 * ( 2004 ) 202002 [ arxiv : hep - ex/0404027 ] . m. hirai , s. kumano and n. saito , arxiv : hep - ph/0603213 . | gluons in nucleon origin of nucleon spin persisted elusive question for two decades experimental efforts theoretical activity spin dependent gluon density can be sized in inclusive deep inelastic scattering measurements scale dependence dependence mild in kinematical range experiments conclusions veiled by ignorance polarization of other partonic species dependence specially sea quarks ambitious inclusive deep inelastic scattering data can suggest mild constraints on gluon polarization recent article efforts to measure less inclusive observables in deep scattering yield allowing combined global qcd fits to inclusive semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering data where sea quarks gluons constrained independent measurements of other less inclusive observables pion production in polarized proton - collisions high transverse momentum hadron pair production provide direct assessments gluon polarization precision to compare gluon polarization estimates from global analysis scattering direct measurements preliminary direct measurements moderate impact in fits remarkable agreement complementarity between both approaches to incorporate data in future global analysisinclusive semi - inclusive polarized deep inelastic scattering qcd framework observables available @xcite recent global analyses demonstrated relevance of corrections impact of recent semi - inclusive data best global qcd fits to dis data constrain gluon polarization moderately positive density uncertainty range @xmath4 one - unit increase @xmath5 @xmath6 conservative @xmath7 variation requirement positivity polarized parton densities correlation between gluon sea quark polarization crucial fits with wide variation in gluon polarization reproduce inclusive data well differentiated sea quark polarization by semi - inclusive data cross section for single inclusive large @xmath0 pion production in longitudinally polarized proton - proton collisions measured at brookhaven national laboratory relativistiv heavy ion collider computed nlo accuracy dependent on @xmath8 @xcite phenix collaboration presented preliminary results with reduced errors @xcite disfavors scenarios with large gluon polarization with estimates updated polarized fitsfigure expectation double spin asymmetry computed with best fit @xcite data reported by phenix @xcite plot uncertainty band @xmath9 variation @xcite compared with estimate nlo fit @xcite uncertainty band allowing @xmath9 estimates @xmath10 from @xcite @xcite compared estimate nlo fit uncertainty band @xmath9 estimates @xmath10 @xmath5 for phenix data best fit @xcite previous to latest set phenix data including 40% scaling uncertainty nondiagonal covariance matrix results @xmath11 @xmath12 data points within @xmath13 range expected global fit consistent value for @xmath5 comparable to @xmath14 ) recent fit @xcite data phenix measurement not including scaling error similar agreement comparing expectation fit for @xmath15 @xmath16@xmath17 against preliminary data from compass @xcite previous measurements @xcite figure include leading order ( lo ) nlo expectation reported values for @xmath15 correspond to lo extraction improved with montecarlo higher order correctionsplot uncertainty band from 2% variation in @xmath5 plus @xmath18 to @xmath19@xmath17 highlights consistency between independent data set frameworks analyses insight interplay between dis data phenix analyzing profile @xmath5 function for different subsets data combined fit against variation net gluon polarization figure profile profile total @xmath5 global fit to inclusive semi - inclusive data including phenix data curve similar shape to @xcite shifted upwards between eleven thirteen units partial contribution of @xmath20 to @xmath5 last contribution plotted as dashed - dotted line offset 430.91 units partial contribution of dis data @xmath21@xmath22 for best fit partial contribution @xmath20 flat around minimum @xmath5 reaches minimum for lower values @xmath23 one - unit variation @xmath5 highlights consistency between data sets against gluon net polarization figure profile for dis data in @xcite dashed line offset by partial contribution of @xmath20 at minimun @xmath21@xmath24 net effects on fit phenix data table partial contributions to @xmath5 at both minimatable1 contributions to @xmath5 values first moment @xmath8 @xmath25@xmath17 cols=" effects imperceptible around minimum noticed for @xmath5@xmath26 variations @xmath7 increase minimum decrease @xmath5@xmath24 @xmath23 overpowered by increase @xmath5@xmath22 position minimum remains for dis data large number dis data fit ( 478 ) limited set @xmath20 small impact not surprising consistency possibility increasing statistics encouraging compared constraints on gluon polarization nucleon global qcd fits deep inelastic scattering data with double spin asymmetry measured phenix at rhic relative statistical weight @xmath20 data in global nlo fit dis data limited agreement moderate improvement combining data sets other direct measurements high-@xmath0 hadron production compass cern lack nlo framework include combined nlo global analysis preliminary agreement checked at nlo accuracy acknowledge daniel de florian comments y. fukao discussions phenix data b. lampe e. reya , phys . rep . 332 , 1 ( 2000 ) e. leader et al. phys rep261 1 1995 ) de florian navarro sassot phys . d 71 * 094018 2005 ) collaboration boyle talk xviith particles nuclei international conference panic05.panic05.lanl.gov ageev phys . 633 25 2006 ) procureur hep - ex/0605043 airapetian . 84 2584 ( 2000 ) adeva . d 70 * 012002 2004 ) mertig van neerven.phys.*c70 637(1996 ) vogelsang phys.rev.*d54 2023 1996 ) de florian garcia r. sassot nucl 470 * 195 ( 1996 ) arxiv hep - ph/9510262 de florian sassot phys . d 62 * 094025 ( 2000 ) jger schafer stratmann vogelsang . d 67 * 054005 ( 2003 ) hep - ph/0211007 de florian phys . d 67 * 054004 2003 ) hep - ph/0210442 martin 28 * 455 ( 2003 ) adler phenix collaboration phys .2004 202002 arxiv hep ex/0404027 m hirai kumano n saito hep ph/0603213 | 0.42819 | 2,604 | 1,316 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,031 | @xmath0-curves were experimentally investigated .
fishtail - effect ( fe ) was observed in mg yba@xmath1cu@xmath2o@xmath3 and yba@xmath1cu@xmath4ag@xmath5o@xmath3 ( at @xmath6 0.02 ) crystals in a wide temperature range 40 k @xmath7 75 k at the orientation of magnetic field @xmath8 .
it was obtained that the influence of bulk pinning on fe is more effective at low temperatures while the influence of surface barriers is more effective at high temperatures .
the value @xmath9 for ag - doped crystals is larger than for a pure one that due to the presence of additional pinning centers , above all on silver atoms . | since the discovery of high - temperature superconductors ( htscs ) , their engineering applications at liquid nitrogen temperatures have drawn much attention .
the yba@xmath1cu@xmath2o@xmath3 ( ybco ) is one of the promising htscs materials for various technical applications .
however , in ceramic materials the critical current density ( @xmath10 ) is , due to the weak link effects , very low , rendering them unsuitable for applications . in order to enhance @xmath10 , the so - called melt - textured growth ( mg ) process
@xcite has been developed , which can significantly enhance @xmath10 .
one interesting phenomenon in the mg htscs is the fishtail effect ( fe ) in @xmath10 as well as in isothermal magnetic hysteresis loops ( @xmath11 curves ) @xcite . as for the fe origin
, some researchers propose the vortex ordered phase to disordered phase transition @xcite to explain this interesting phenomenon , while others attribute it to the bulk pinning @xcite . in the vortex phase transition explanation ,
the fe exists both on a single @xmath12 curve and on a single @xmath13 curve .
however , in the bulk pinning explanation , the fe appears on @xmath11 curves whereas on a single magnetization vs. temperature @xmath14 curve it is seldom reported . in the previous work , the critical state model is used to study the isothermal @xmath11 curves @xcite .
however , for htscs , due to their operation at higher temperatures and due to their small activation energy @xmath15 , the flux creep is significant .
hence , non - linear flux creep models were developed .
meanwhile , the surface barrier @xcite , which prevents vortex entering ( @xmath16 ) and exiting ( @xmath17 ) superconductors , has strong effects on the irreversibility of htscs .
the goal of this work was to contribute to the understanding of the fe origin in terms of significant influence of both bulk pinning and surface barriers .
mg samples yba@xmath1cu@xmath2o@xmath3 and yba@xmath1cu@xmath4ag@xmath5o@xmath3 were grown as was described in @xcite .
two samples , pure crystal ( s1 ) and ag - doped crystal ( s2 ) , were used in the present work .
physical properties of the samples are presented in table [ tab:1 ] .
.[tab:1]physical characteristics for samples yba@xmath1cu@xmath2o@xmath3 ( s1 ) and yba@xmath1cu@xmath4ag@xmath5o@xmath3 ( s2 ) [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] field dependences of critical current density @xmath10 ( a ) and derivative @xmath18 ( b ) at temperature @xmath1970 k for sample s1 right after annealing . points a and b denotes positions of minimum and maximum respectively.,width=307,height=336 ] the measurements of isothermal hysteresis loops ( @xmath11 curves ) at various temperatures ( 20 k@xmath785 k ) were carried out in fields ( -6 t@xmath206 t ) parallel to the c - axis by means of a commercial vibrating sample magnetometer ( vsm ) .
the field sweep rate was @xmath21 t / min . to obtain an additional parameter @xmath22
the resistivity @xmath23 curves were measured on two samples ( the first one is pure and the second one is ag - doped ) which were obtained from the same single - domain bulks as s1 and s2 .
transport measurements were performed using a physical property measurement system ( ppms ) .
the experiment was divided into two steps .
@xmath11 curves were measured : a ) right after annealing of samples in oxygen ( during 240 hours at 400@xmath24c ) ; b ) after long - term aging at the room temperature ( six months ) , in which case almost all relaxation processes were finished .
the first value for @xmath25 in table [ tab:1 ] corresponds to a ) and the second value corresponds to b ) .
from the measured @xmath11 curves the critical current density was calculated using the critical state model @xcite that have been developed in @xcite : @xmath26 where @xmath27 ( @xmath280 , @xmath290 are the values of magnetic moment at field @xmath30 , @xmath31 is the density of sample , a , b and c are geometric dimensions of sample .
dependences @xmath13 ( fig . [ fig:1]a for @xmath32=70 k ) were calculated for the field range 0 t@xmath206 t. to obtain the exact position of maximum on @xmath13 curves the derivative @xmath18 was calculated for each temperature ( see example at fig . [
fig:1]b ) .
[ fig:1 ] shows positions of both minimum ( point a ) and maximum ( point b ) on j vs h curve , where derivative @xmath330 .
contour for @xmath34 for sample s1 right after annealing .
points a and b coincide with points a and b in the fig .
[ fig:1],width=307 ] then the 3d surface @xmath35 was obtained .
intermediate curves were defined by the 3rd degree polynomial ( spline - function ) .
the contour for @xmath34 is shown in fig .
[ fig:2 ] . points a and b correspond to those in fig .
[ fig:1 ] .
this method is useful to obtain position of maximum @xmath36 ( or ensemble of points b ) not only at given temperatures but also for intermediate temperatures .
temperature dependences of critical current density at zero magnetic field for samples s1 ( green lines ) and s2 ( blue lines ) , right after annealing ( curves 1,2 ) and after long - term aging ( curves 3,4),width=307 ] fig .
[ fig:3 ] shows the temperature dependences @xmath12 , on which fe appears .
however , according to @xcite , fe appears not due to the order - disorder phase transition of vortex lattice .
the possible reason of the fe existence is a significant influence of both bulk pinning and surface barriers @xcite . from the model in previous chapter
the @xmath37 dependences of @xmath36 were obtained ( see fig .
[ fig:4 ] ) .
temperature - field dependences of @xmath36-position for samples s1 ( green lines ) and s2 ( blue lines ) , right after annealing ( curves 1,2 ) and after long - term aging ( curves 3,4),width=307 ] as one can see from table [ tab:1 ] the value of the critical temperature @xmath25 for sample s1 changed from 90.2 k to 89.8 k and for sample s2 changed from 91.3 k to 91.1 k. this indicates the optimal oxygen annealing process and aging effects are not caused by changing in @xmath38 ( especially for sample s2 ) . according to the estimations performed in @xcite the surface barriers are more important at high temperatures while the bulk pining is more important at low temperatures .
as one can see from fig .
[ fig:4 ] the position of @xmath36 significantly evolves after long - term aging .
the maximum field @xmath9 for sample s1 decreases from 4.25 t to 3.8 t and the minimum temperature @xmath39 increases from 37.5 k to 48 k ( curves 1 and 3 in fig . [ fig:4 ] ) .
such changes can be induced by the redistribution of pinning centers in the crystal or , in another words , bulk pinning changes during aging .
constancy of the maximum temperature @xmath40 for s1 corresponds to the influence of surface barriers at high temperatures .
the aging effect for sample s2 is not so significant as for s1 .
it is related to the presence of considerable mechanical tensions in the sample ( large value of an additional parameter @xmath411.5 k ) that prevent the redistribution of pinning centers .
larger value of @xmath9 ( for s2 as compared with s1 ) corresponds to the presence of additional pinning centers on silver atoms @xcite .
a possible reason of the decrease of @xmath9 and increase of @xmath39 for s1 is the decreasing number of dislocations . in another words ,
the crystal s1 becomes more homogeneous after aging .
in summary , mg ybco samples were investigated by measuring @xmath0-curves . on these curves
fe was observed is in a wide temperature range .
the origin of the fe existence is a significant influence of both surface barrier and bulk pinning .
bulk pinning influences parameters @xmath9 and @xmath39 while surface barrier influences @xmath40 .
undoped ybco is characterized by a significant aging effect which is manifested in a considerable change of @xmath9 and @xmath39 .
this corresponds to the change of bulk pinning . for ag - doped ybco
there are no significant changes in @xmath9 , @xmath39 and @xmath40 .
such difference is caused by the redistribution of pinning centers in undoped ybco while ag - doped ybco is characterized by huge mechanical tensions which prevent redistribution .
possible origin of redistribution for s1 is a decrease in number of dislocations , i.e. sample becomes more homogenous .
the work was partly supported by the slovak research and development agency ( no .
apvv-0006 - 07 ) and the slovak grant agency vega ( no.1/0159/09 ) the financial support of u.s.steel - dz energetika koice is acknowledged .
one of author ( d.l . )
is very thankful to the national scholarship program of slovak republic ( saia ) for the financial support during his stay in slovakia . | discovery of high - temperature superconductors engineering applications at liquid nitrogen temperatures drawn attention yba@xmath1cu@xmath2o@xmath3 ybco ) promising htscs materials for applications in ceramic materials critical current density @xmath10 low unsuitable enhance @xmath10 melt - textured growth mg ) process @xcite developed @xmath10 mg htscs fishtail effect ( fe ) in @xmath10 isothermal magnetic hysteresis loops curves @xcite fe origin researchers propose vortex ordered phase to disordered phase transition @xcite others bulk pinning @xcite explanation fe exists on @xmath12 and @xmath13 curve bulk pinning explanation fe appears on @xmath11 curves single magnetization vs. temperature @xmath14 curve seldom reported critical state model used isothermal @xmath11 curves for htscs operation at higher temperatures small activation energy flux creep significant non - linear flux creep models developed surface barrier @xcite prevents vortex entering exiting superconductors irreversibility of htscs goal work understanding fe origin influence bulk pinning surface barrierssamples yba@xmath1cu grown in @xcite two samples pure crystal s1 ag - doped crystal s2 used in work physical properties presented in table tab:1 for samples yba s2 field dependences of critical current density @xmath10 derivative @xmath18 b at temperature @xmath1970 k for sample s1 after annealing points a b positions minimum maximum measurements of isothermal hysteresis loops @xmath11 curves at temperatures 20 in fields ( -6 t@xmath206 t ) parallel to c - axis commercial vibrating sample magnetometer field sweep rate @xmath21 t / min resistivity curves measured on two samples first pure second ag - doped from same single - domain bulks transport measurements using physical property measurement system ppms ) experiment divided into two steps curves measured after annealing in oxygen 240 hours 400@xmath24c after long - term aging at room temperature six months relaxation processes finishedfirst value @xmath25 table corresponds a second b ) measured @xmath11 curves critical current density calculated using critical state model @xcite @xmath26 @xmath27 magnetic moment field density sample a b c geometric dimensions dependences @xmath13 @xmath32=70 k ) calculated field range 0 t@xmath206 t exact position maximum @xmath13 curves derivative @xmath18 calculated each temperature example fig fig:1 ] shows positions minimum maximum b ) on j vs h curve derivative @xmath330 contour for @xmath34 sample s1 after annealing points a b coincide with points 3d surface @xmath35 obtained intermediate curves defined by 3rd degree polynomial spline - function ) contour @xmath34 shown in fig .:2 points a b correspond to fig method obtain position maximum @xmath36 at given temperatures intermediate temperatures temperature dependences of critical current density at zero magnetic field for samples s1 s2 after annealing long - term aging shows temperature dependences @xmath12 fe appears according to @xcite fe not due to transition vortex lattice possible is influence of bulk pinning surface barriers @xmath37 dependences of @xmath36 obtained temperature - field dependences of @xmath36-position for samples s1 s2 after annealing long - term aging critical temperature @xmath25 for sample s1 changed from 90.2 k to 89.8 k s2 91.3 k to 91.1 k optimal oxygen annealing process aging effects not caused by changing @xmath38 especially s2 surface barriers important at high temperatures bulk pining important at low temperatures position of @xmath36 evolves after long - term aging maximum field @xmath9 for s1 decreases from 4.25 t to 3.8 t minimum temperature @xmath39 increases from 37.5 k to 48 k changes induced by redistribution of pinning centers bulk changes during aging maximum temperature @xmath40 for s1 corresponds to influence surface barriers at high temperatures aging effect for sample s2 not so significant related to mechanical tensions in sample prevent redistribution of pinning centerslarger value @xmath9 s2 compared s1 corresponds additional pinning centers silver atoms @xcite possible decrease @xmath9 increase @xmath39 s1 decreasing dislocations crystal s1 becomes homogeneous after aging mg ybco samples investigated @xmath0-curves fe observed wide temperature range origin fe surface barrier bulk pinning bulk pinning influences @xmath9 @xmath39 surface barrier influences @xmath40 undoped ybco significant aging effect change @xmath9 @xmath39 corresponds change bulk pinning ag - doped ybco no significant changes @xmath9 @xmath40 difference caused by redistribution pinning centers undoped ybco ag - doped ybco huge mechanical tensions prevent redistribution origin redistribution s1 decrease dislocations sample becomes more homogenous work supported by slovak research development agency grant agency financial support u.s.steel - dz energetika koice acknowledged author thankful national scholarship program slovak republic financial support | 0.316716 | 2,212 | 1,065 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,038 | the influence of surface anisotropy on the magnetization processes of maghemite nanoparticles with ellipsoidal shape is studied by means of monte carlo simulations .
radial surface anisotropy is found to favor the formation of hedgehog - like spin structures that become more stable as the surface anisotropy constant at the surface @xmath0 is increased form the value at the core .
we have studied the change in the low temperature hysteresis loops with the particle aspect ratio and with @xmath0 , finding a change in the magnetization reversal mode as @xmath0 or the particle elongation is increased . | most spins in a magnetic nanoparticle are at the particle surface where the reduced coordination and the broken translational symmetry of the lattice are responsible for changes in some local physical properties of the material . among them
, there is the reduction in exchange interaction constants and the increased local anisotropy at the particle surface with respect to bulk values @xcite phenomenological model that described this last phenomenon was first introduced by nel in @xcite , but experimental determination of the microscopic structure and properties of the surface of nanoparticles is still a challenge to be solved .
for example , an estimate of the surface anisotropy constant can only extracted indirectly from magnetic measurements by fitting to an effective anisotropy constant @xcite .
however , there are increasing evidences from experiments that surface effects play a dominant role in the anomalous low temperature magnetic properties of nanoparticle systems @xcite . therefore , simulations of magnetic properties in which microscopic parameters extracted form experiments are used @xcite may serve as a benchmark to test the phenomenological models at hand . in this article , we use the monte carlo method to simulate the magnetization processes of individual nanoparticles modeled by classical heisenberg spins on the maghemite lattice with radial surface anisotropy @xmath0 different from that on the core .
the model considered is an extension to heisenberg spins of our previous mc simulation for an ising spin model of a @xmath1-fe@xmath2o@xmath3 ( maghemite ) particle @xcite .
the particles considered have spherical or ellipsoidal shape with diameter @xmath4 and elongations @xmath5 ( in units of the cell size @xmath6 ) , containing from @xmath7 to @xmath8 spins .
the surface spins of the particle are considered to be those on the outer unit cell and have anisotropy constant @xmath0 and radial local anisotropy axes along the directions @xmath9 , whereas core spins have uniaxial anisotropy @xmath10 pointing along the z - axis .
indirect estimations of the anisotropy constants yield values in the range @xmath11 k , @xmath12 k , so we will fix @xmath13 k and vary only @xmath0 .
the interaction hamiltonian in temperature units can be written as @xmath14+\sum_{i= 1}^{n_{surf}}\left[k_s(\vec{s}_i \cdot \hat n_i)^2 \right]\ .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the first term , @xmath15 are the nearest - neighbours exchange constants among the spins in the two sublattices with different coordination of maghemite , all of them are antiferromagnetic , being @xmath16 the strongest in magnitude and making maghemite a ferrimagnetic compound @xcite .
we have computed equilibrium configurations by starting from a disordered state at a high temperature and decreasing the temperature in steps @xmath17 .
hysteresis loops are started from a saturating field along the core easy - axis that is decreased in steps @xmath18 , during which the magnetization is averaged over @xmath19 mc steps . in both cases ,
the standard mc method for continuous spins has been used with a trial jump consisting in a combination of uniform and small angle around the current spin direction that allows to obtain reliable simulations for treat the weak and strong anisotropy cases with the same algorithm , see @xcite for the details .
in fig . [ fig_1 ] , we show snapshots of the spin configurations attained after the cooling process previously described , for several values of the surface anisotropy constant @xmath0 .
the pictures present a cut of one unit cell width along the equatorial plane and along the major axis of the particle . for values of @xmath0
smaller than a certain critical value @xmath20 ( which depends on the particle size and on the shape ) , the radial anisotropy at the surface is not strong enough to ca nt the core spins towards the radial direction .
therefore , the core spins are antiferromagnetically aligned with a small net magnetization component along the @xmath21 axis due a small number of non - compensated spins ( see fig .
[ fig_1 ] for @xmath22 ) .
however , at the particle surface , the spins present already a high degree of disorder due to the competition between the reduced local exchange field ( locally reduced with respect to that on the core spins ) and the anisotropy , inducing some degree of frustration at the surface . as @xmath0
is further increased ( see fig .
[ fig_1 ] for @xmath23 ) , the disorder of the surface spins is transmitted to the particle core and results in the departure of core spins from the local anisotropy axis towards the radial direction .
finally , when anisotropy dominates over exchange energy ( @xmath24 , see fig .
[ fig_1 ] for @xmath25 ) , the hedgehog - like structures are formed , with the spins pointing along the local radial direction and having antiparallel orientations with the nearest neighbors on the other sublattice .
we have also studied the influence of surface anisotropy and particle shape on the magnetization reversal processes . for this purpose ,
zero temperature hysteresis loops have been simulated using the procedure described previously for ellipsoidal particles with elongations @xmath5 and diameter @xmath4 .
some selected results are presented in fig .
[ fig_2 ] , where the total magnetization component along the field direction ( left panels ) is shown together with the contribution of the surface and core spins to @xmath26 , the sum of the projections of spins onto the local anisotropy axis ( central and right panels ) . by comparing the loops for @xmath0= 10 to those for @xmath0= 100 , we see that the coercive field increases and the remanence decreases with increasing surface anisotropy , independently of the elongation l of the particle .
moreover , the presence of disordered groups of spins at the surface induced by surface anisotropy makes the loops more elongated and increases the closure fields of the loops as found also in experiments on ferrimagnetic oxides @xcite .
the rounding of the loops near the coercive field clearly indicates a progressive departure from a uniform reversal mechanism with increasing @xmath0 . when looking only at the @xmath27 component , not much difference is appreciated between the loops for particles with different l because of the compensation of the spin components transverse to the field direction due to the symmetry of revolution of the particles around the @xmath21 axis .
however , upon further inspection of the @xmath28 and @xmath29 contributions and animated snapshots taken along the loops @xcite , the details of the reversal process can be better under - stood .
let us notice first that , when @xmath0 is increased from @xmath20 , the reversal mechanism changes from quasi - uniform ( induced by the core ) rotation at low @xmath0 values , to a process in which the formation of surface hedgehog - like structures induce the non - uniform switching of the whole particle . in the first regime ( @xmath22 case in fig .
[ fig_2 ] ) , the core and surface spins point mostly along the z axis ( @xmath30 , @xmath31 ) except near the coercive field , where they make short excursions towards the radial direction driven by the surface anisotropy ( see the dips in @xmath29 and the cusps in @xmath28 ) . however , for @xmath0 > @xmath20 ( @xmath25 case in fig .
[ fig_2 ] ) , surface spins remain near the local radial easy - directions ( @xmath32 ) during the reversal , while the core spins are dragged out the z local easy - axis by the surface spins during the reversal , except for values of h near the closure field .
this is indicated by the widening of the dips in @xmath29 and the global decrease of @xmath29 values as @xmath0 increases .
finally , let us remark also that , for all the @xmath0 considered , the @xmath28 values along the whole hysteresis loops increase with increasing @xmath33 , which indicates that the surface spins remain closer to the local radial direction during the reversal as particles become more elongated .
when increasing @xmath33 , the dips in @xmath29 become less profound for @xmath24 , and indication that reversal of core spins along the radial direction is suppressed by the elongation . however , for weak anisotropy ( @xmath34 ) , the more elongated the particles are , the greater the deviation of surface spins towards the radial direction during the reversal .
we acknowledge cesca and cepba under coordination of c@xmath35 for computer facilities . this work has been supported by the spanish seeuid through the mat2003 - 01124 project and the generalitat de catalunya through the 2001sgr00066 cirit project . | spins in magnetic nanoparticle at surface reduced coordination broken translational symmetry for changes in local physical properties reduction in exchange interaction constants increased local anisotropy at surface bulk values phenomenological model introduced by nel experimental determination of microscopic structure properties surface estimate of surface anisotropy constant extracted from magnetic measurements fitting anisotropy constant evidences surface effects dominant role in low temperature magnetic properties nanoparticle simulations of magnetic properties microscopic parameters extracted form experiments may benchmark to test phenomenological models monte carlo method simulate magnetization processes of nanoparticles by classical heisenberg spins on maghemite lattice with radial surface anisotropy different from core model extension to heisenberg spins of previous simulation for ising spin model of maghemite particle particles have spherical or ellipsoidal shape diameter elongations @xmath5 @xmath7 to @xmath8 spins surface spins on outer unit cell have anisotropy constant radial local anisotropy axes along directions core spins have uniaxial anisotropy z - axisestimations anisotropy constants yield values @xmath11 @xmath12 k fix @xmath13 k vary @xmath0 interaction hamiltonian in temperature units written as @xmath14+\sum= 1 first term @xmath15 nearest - neighbours exchange constants spins two sublattices different coordination maghemite antiferromagnetic @xmath16 strongest maghemite ferrimagnetic compound computed equilibrium configurations starting disordered state high temperature decreasing temperature steps @xmath17 hysteresis loops started from saturating field core - axis decreased @xmath18 magnetization averaged over @xmath19 mc steps standard mc method for continuous spins used trial jump uniform small angle current spin direction reliable simulations weak strong anisotropy cases see @xcite details fig snapshots spin configurations after cooling process values surface anisotropy constant @xmath0 pictures present cut one unit cell width equatorial plane major axis particle values smaller than critical value @xmath20 particle size shape radial anisotropy surface not strong enough core spins towards radial directioncore spins antiferromagnetically aligned with small net magnetization along @xmath21 axis due non - compensated spins fig for @xmath22 at particle surface spins present high disorder due to competition between reduced local exchange field anisotropy inducing frustration surface @xmath0 increased @xmath23 disorder surface spins transmitted to particle core results in departure core spins from anisotropy axis towards radial direction anisotropy dominates over exchange energy hedgehog - like structures formed spins pointing along radial direction antiparallel orientations with neighbors studied influence of surface anisotropy particle shape on magnetization reversal processes zero temperature hysteresis loops simulated for ellipsoidal particles with elongations @xmath5 @xmath4 results presented in fig_2 total magnetization along field direction contribution surface core spins to @xmath26 sum of projections spins onto anisotropy axis loops for @xmath0= 10 to @xmath0= 100 coercive field increases remanence decreases with increasing surface anisotropy independently of elongation particledisordered spins at surface anisotropy makes loops elongated increases closure fields in experiments on ferrimagnetic oxides rounding loops near coercive field indicates departure from uniform reversal mechanism with increasing @xmath0 @xmath27 component difference between loops for particles with different l compensation of spin components to field direction due symmetry of revolution around @xmath21 axis further inspection of @xmath28 @xmath29 contributions animated snapshots details reversal process better under - when @xmath0 increased from @xmath20 reversal mechanism changes from quasi - uniform rotation at low @xmath0 values to surface hedgehog - like structures induce non - uniform switching particle in first regime core and surface spins point along z axis except near coercive field short excursions towards radial direction surface anisotropy for @xmath0 > @xmath20 surface spins remain near local radial easy - directions during reversal core spins dragged out z local easy - axis by surface spins except for values h near closure fieldindicated by widening dips @xmath29 global decrease values as @xmath0 increases @xmath28 values increase @xmath33 surface spins closer to radial direction reversal particles elongated increasing @xmath33 dips @xmath29 less profound for @xmath24 reversal core spins suppressed by elongation weak anisotropy @xmath34 ) more elongated particles greater deviation surface spins towards radial reversal acknowledge cesca cepba coordination c@xmath35 for computer facilities work supported by spanish seeuid mat2003 - 01124 project generalitat de catalunya 2001sgr00066 project | 0.313648 | 1,925 | 964 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,041 | we introduce a new technique to detect the discrete temperature steps that cosmic strings might have left in the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) anisotropy map .
the technique provides a validity test on the pattern search of cosmic strings that could serve as the groundwork for future pattern searches .
the detecting power of the technique is only constrained by two unavoidable features of cmb data : ( 1 ) the finite pixelization of the sky map and ( 2 ) the gaussian fluctuation from instrumental noise and primordial anisotropy .
we set the upper limit on the cosmic string parameter as @xmath0 at the 95% confidence level ( cl ) and find that the amplitude of the temperature step has to be greater than @xmath1 in order to be detected for the _ wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe ( wmap ) _ 3 year data . | cosmic string is one of the relic structures that are predicted to be produced in the course of symmetry breaking in the hot , early universe , whose discovery will probably be an important landmark for the high energy physics .
the quest for cosmic strings has been conducted in two ways : statistical method and direct search for individual cosmic string . on the statistical side
, many studies agreed that the contribution from cosmic strings to statistical observables such as the power spectrum is at most @xmath2 @xcite , reconfirming that cosmic strings played a minor role , if any , in making the universe .
other workers have set upper limits on the cosmic string parameter @xmath3 @xcite . in this letter
, we introduce a technique for estimating how strong a signal from cosmic strings has to be in order to be identified unequivocally .
the detecting power of this technique is calibrated by applying it to simulated anisotropy maps based on reasonable modeling . in the last part of this letter
, we apply this technique to the _ wmap _ 3 year w - band data set and analyze the implication of the results .
a cosmic string can leave discrete temperature steps in a cmb anisotropy map due to the kaiser - stebbins effect @xcite , with the height of a step @xmath4 given by @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the universal background temperature of cmb .
however , those step patterns are probably obscured by instrumental noises and other physical structures of anisotropies .
decomposition of a cmb anisotropy sky map patch .
a square patch is decomposed into the uniform background temperature ( @xmath7 ) + gaussian fluctuation ( @xmath8)+ discrete temperature step ( @xmath9 ) .
the number of pixels in a patch is @xmath10.,width=491 ] we consider a square patch of the cmb anisotropy sky map that extends to a size of the horizon at the time of recombination so that the conic spacetime formed by a cosmic string can be in effect within the region .
then another square patch of the cmb anisotropy sky map that contains a segment of moving cosmic string can be decomposed into three parts , as illustrated in figure [ fig1 ] : ( 1 ) the uniform background temperature ( @xmath7 ) , ( 2 ) the gaussian fluctuation ( variance @xmath11 ) , and ( 3 ) the discrete temperature step ( @xmath9 ) from a moving cosmic string .
the uniform background temperature @xmath7 comes from superhorizon - scale primordial fluctuations .
since we pick a horizon - sized region , the super - horizon fluctuations will appear to be a constant temperature shift for the whole patch .
smaller scale ( sub - horizon ) fluctuations and instrumental noise add up incoherently to form a gaussian fluctuation with the variance @xmath12 , where @xmath13 and @xmath14 are variances for fluctuations of primordial origin and instrumental noise , respectively . we introduce five parameters that characterize a square patch of a string - embedded sky map , @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 ( blueshifted pixels / total pixels ) , and @xmath17 ( orientation of step ) .
we concoct a simulated patch of the cmb anisotropy map by assigning arbitrary legitimate values to the parameters and adding the three components illustrated in figure [ fig1 ] .
to recover these parameters from the cmb anisotropy map where the step pattern is intermixed , we employ five observables @xmath18 that can be expressed in terms of @xmath19 where @xmath20 represents the signal at the @xmath21th pixel and @xmath22 is the two - dimensional gridded position vector for the @xmath21th pixel defined in a square patch .
evolution of errors of characteristic parameters as functions of @xmath15 with input values of parameters @xmath23 .
_ left panels _ : @xmath24 pixels in a square . _
middle panels _ : @xmath25 pixels .
_ right panels _ : @xmath26 pixels . for each size of patch ,
the number of simulations performed is 10,000 .
the shaded regions indicate the ranges of @xmath15 for which the step feature in a patch is not obvious compared to its background fluctuation ( @xmath27 ) .
the result on @xmath28 is biased upward because the simulations with erroneous values of @xmath28 ( @xmath29 ) were not included in the statistics.,width=491 ] in the absence of the background fluctuation ( @xmath30 ) , the following analytic expressions for the characteristic parameters return the exact input values : @xmath31 with the background fluctuation turned on , an observed characteristic parameter @xmath32 is expressed as an unbiased estimate @xmath33 plus a gaussian error @xmath34 @xmath35 , @xmath36 the errors ( @xmath37 ) present in the equations ( [ 11 ] ) are measures of how precisely the information on a temperature step screened by background fluctuation is recovered .
figure [ fig2 ] shows the behaviors of errors as functions of @xmath15 for three different pixel numbers for a patch .
the standard deviation of the background fluctuation chosen here is the mean standard deviation of patches with angular radius @xmath38 ( the angular size of the horizon at the recombination for the @xmath39cdm model ) for the wmap 3 year w - band data set with the kp2 mask applied .
the most pronounced feature of the graphs is that the error bars are wildly undulating for small @xmath15 compared to @xmath8 , with attenuating envelopes as @xmath15 increases .
the algorithm works poorly for low @xmath15 compared to @xmath8 , such as the @xmath40 error on the orientation estimate .
.[table1]simulation results at the critical values of @xmath15 above which @xmath41s are small enough and do not decrease any more . [ cols="^,>,<,>,<,>,<",options="header " , ] even the breakdowns of the algorithm do happen in the shaded region , resulting in erroneous parameter values such as negative @xmath15 or @xmath16 not in the range between 0 and 1 .
simulations with collapsed results are not included in the statistics shown in figure [ fig2 ] since those cases are evidently the ones with insufficiently strong signals against background fluctuation .
as @xmath15 increases , we begin obtaining the computed parameters that are very close to the true values with acceptable errors ( dubbed the `` good '' results ) , and it allows us to recover the temperature step parameters faithfully .
we also find from figure [ fig2 ] that a patch with more pixels works better with a faster attenuation of uncertainties .
table [ table1 ] displays the performances of the algorithm for the values of @xmath15 at the borders , above which errors for the temperature step ( @xmath41 ) do not get any better .
we use circular patches for _ wmap _ data analysis rather than square patches because of the computational advantage .
algebraic expressions for the observables given in equations ( [ 6])-([10 ] ) work very well for circular patches with negligible numerical differences for the case of square patches . a square patch with @xmath26 pixels at the normal resolution of _ wmap _ w - band data
covers nearly the same area as the circular region with angular radius @xmath38 .
we performed a further detecting power test with @xmath26 pixels patches and found empirically that the relation between the critical value of @xmath15 , @xmath42 , above which `` good '' results start to come out , and @xmath8 is @xmath43 the different choices of input values for the parameters @xmath16 , @xmath17 , or @xmath7 showed no noticeable difference in the evolutions of errors .
an observed cmb anisotropy map is an aggregate of various independent modes of perturbation ranging from tiny sub - horizon scales to super - horizon scales well beyond the correlation length .
as illustrated in figure [ fig1 ] , fluctuations with larger or smaller scales compared to the size of a test patch are neatly prescribed , but the intermediate scales whose wavelengths are comparable to the size of a test patch will appear to be continuous temperature tilts that also give plausible values of the step parameters .
one drawback of this algorithm is that it does not distinguish between a discrete temperature step and a smooth temperature slope .
however , this shortcoming can be easily fixed : if an apparent temperature step is detected at a spot on the map , we repeat the analysis with a half - sized patch at the same spot . if the structure is a continuous slope , then it would return half the value of @xmath28 than the previous result , while for the signal from a discrete step , the returned @xmath28 should stay the same within the error .
we conducted the step signal search through the _ wmap _ 3 year w - band data set and found 193,160 unqualified signals against background fluctuation ( the constraint in eq .
[ [ 12 ] ] is not applied ) , 129,049 qualified steps+tilts ( signals that meet the constraint eq . [
[ 12 ] ] ; i.e. , @xmath44 ) , and 12,330 qualified discriminated steps .
distributions of @xmath28 detected in _ wmap _ 3 year w - band data set .
the number of step signals found are 193,160 unqualified signals ( _ dotted curve _ ) , 129,049 qualified steps+tilts ( _ dashed curve _ ) , and 12,330 qualified steps ( _ solid curve_).,width=264 ] the @xmath28 value of qualified steps is in the range @xmath45 as the curves show in figure [ fig3 ] . patches with radius @xmath38 in the _ wmap _ 3 year w - band have a background fluctuation @xmath8 less than 176 @xmath46 in the kp2-mask - cleared region .
this means , at the worst case , we can identify a step signal as low as @xmath47 with moderate errors .
therefore , if there are cosmic string signals with @xmath48 and if they are located in the available region ( out of the galactic plane or the kp2 masked region ) , they would not be missed .
thus , we can set an upper limit on the cosmic string signal @xmath49 where @xmath50 is arbitrary .
thus , with @xmath51 @xcite , the upper limit of the cosmic string parameter @xmath3 can be estimated as @xmath52
we have presented and tested a new technique to directly discover cosmic strings via the patterns they would produce in a cmb anisotropy map .
we found that the minimum magnitude of the step signal that is required to be unequivocally identified is @xmath53 for the _ wmap _ 3 year w - band data set .
this algorithm can be used to crop the reliable step signals from the cmb anisotropy data , and it will serve as the valuable ground work for future pattern searches with more refined data , such as further _
wmap _ data releases or _ planck _ data . 99 pogosian et al . , 2003 , phys.rev.d , 68 , 023506 wu , j - h . , 2005 , astro - ph/0501239 fraisse , a. , 2005 , astro - ph/0503402 davis , a .- c . & kibble , t.w.b , 2005 , contemp.phys , 46 , 313 wyman , m. , pogosian , l . , & wasserman , i. , 2005 , phys.rev.d , 72 , 023513 hindmarsh , m. , 1994 , apj , 431 , 534 perivolaropoulos , l. & simatos , n. , 1998 , astro - ph/9803321 jeong , e. & smoot , g. f. , 2005 , apj , 624 , 21 lo , a. s. & wright , e. l. , 2005 , astro - ph/0503120 seljak , u. & slosar , a. , 2006 , phys.rev.d , 74 , 063523 pogosian , l. , wasserman , i. , & wyman , m. , 2006 , astro - ph/0604141 fraisse , a. , 2006 , astro - ph/0603589 kaiser , n. & stebbins , a. , 1984 , nature , 310 , 391 vilenkin , a. & shellard , e. p. s. , 1994 , cosmic strings and other topological defects , ( cambridge , uk , cambridge university press ) grski , k. m. et.al . , 2005 , apj , 622 , 759 | cosmic string relic structures predicted produced symmetry breaking early universe discovery important landmark for high energy physics quest for cosmic strings conducted statistical method direct search statistical studies contribution cosmic strings to statistical observables power spectrum most @xmath2 @xcite minor role in universe set upper limits on cosmic string parameter @xmath3 @xcite technique for estimating signal from cosmic strings detecting power calibrated to simulated anisotropy maps apply technique to wmap _ 3 year w - band data set analyze results cosmic string leave discrete temperature steps in cmb anisotropy map due to kaiser - stebbins effect height step @xmath4 given by @xmath5 @xmath6 universal background temperature step patterns obscured by instrumental noises physical structures anisotropies decomposition of cmb anisotropy sky map patch square patch into uniform background temperature + gaussian fluctuation+ discrete temperature step ) number of pixels in patch is @xmath10.,width=491 consider square patch map extends to size horizon at time recombination conic spacetime formed by cosmic string regionsquare patch cmb anisotropy sky map moving cosmic string decomposed into three parts illustrated in figure uniform background temperature @xmath7 gaussian fluctuation @xmath11 discrete temperature step @xmath9 from moving cosmic string uniform background temperature @xmath7 from superhorizon - scale primordial fluctuations super - horizon fluctuations constant temperature shift for patch smaller scale sub - horizon fluctuations instrumental noise add form gaussian fluctuation with variance @xmath12 @xmath13 and @xmath14 are variances for fluctuations primordial origin instrumental noise introduce five parameters square patch string map @xmath7 orientation step concoct simulated patch by assigning values to parameters adding three components in figure fig1 recover parameters from employ five observables @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 signal at @xmath21th pixel @xmath22 two - dimensional gridded position vector for @xmath21th pixel evolution of errors of parameters functions of @xmath15 with input values parameters @xmath23 left panels @xmath24 pixels middle panels @xmath25 pixelsright panels @xmath26 pixels each size patch simulations 10,000 shaded regions indicate ranges @xmath15 step feature not obvious compared background fluctuation @xmath27 result @xmath28 biased upward simulations erroneous values not included statistics absence background fluctuation @xmath30 analytic expressions characteristic parameters return exact input values @xmath31 background fluctuation turned on characteristic parameter @xmath32 unbiased estimate @xmath33 gaussian error @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 errors @xmath37 equations measures information temperature step background fluctuation figure shows behaviors errors functions @xmath15 three pixel numbers patch standard deviation background fluctuation mean patches angular radius @xmath38 size horizon @xmath39cdm model wmap 3 year w - band data set kp2 mask error bars undulating for small @xmath15 @xmath8 attenuating envelopes as @xmath15 increases algorithm works poorly for low @xmath15 @xmath40 error orientation estimate[table1]simulation results at critical values @xmath15 above @xmath41s small decreasecols="><",options="header " breakdowns algorithm happen in shaded region erroneous parameter values negative @xmath15 or @xmath16 range 0 and 1 simulations with collapsed results not included in statistics figure insufficiently strong signals against background fluctuation @xmath15 increases computed parameters close to true values with acceptable errors good '' results temperature step parameters patch with more pixels works better faster attenuation of uncertainties table displays performances algorithm for values @xmath15 at borders above errors for temperature step ( @xmath41 ) use circular patches for data analysis square patches computational advantage algebraic expressions for observables equations ( 6- work well for circular patches with negligible numerical differences square patch with @xmath26 pixels at normal resolution covers same area as circular region with angular radius @xmath38 detecting power test with @xmath26 pixels patches relation between critical value of @xmath15 @xmath42 choices input values for @xmath16 @xmath7 showed no difference in evolutions errorsobserved cmb anisotropy map aggregate of modes perturbation sub - horizon to super - horizon scales beyond correlation length illustrated in figure fluctuations with larger or smaller scales compared to size test patch prescribed intermediate scales comparable to continuous temperature tilts plausible values step parameters drawback algorithm distinguish discrete temperature step and smooth temperature slope shortcoming fixed if apparent temperature step detected repeat analysis with half - sized patch same if structure continuous slope half value of @xmath28 for signal from discrete step returned @xmath28 stay same conducted step signal search wmap _ 3 year w - band data set found 193,160 unqualified signals against background fluctuation 129,049 qualified steps+tilts 12,330 qualified discriminated steps distributions of @xmath28 detected in 3 year w - band data set number of step signals found are 193,160 unqualified 129,049 qualified steps+tilts 12,330 qualified steps @xmath28 value of qualified steps in range @xmath45 as curves show in figure fig3 ]patches radius @xmath38 wmap 3 year w - band background fluctuation @xmath8 less than 176 @xmath46 kp2-mask - cleared region worst identify step signal low @xmath47 moderate errors cosmic string signals with @xmath48 in available region galactic plane kp2 masked region not missed set upper limit cosmic string signal @xmath49 where @xmath50 arbitrary @xmath51 upper limit cosmic string parameter @xmath3 estimated @xmath52 new technique discover cosmic strings via patterns cmb anisotropy map minimum magnitude step signal @xmath53 for wmap 3 year w - band data set algorithm crop reliable step signals from cmb anisotropy data ground work for future pattern searches refined data wmap planck data pogosian et al . 2003 phys.rev.d , 68 , 023506 2005 astro - ph/0501239 fraisse ph/0503402 davis kibble 2005 contemp.phys , 46 , 313 wyman pogosian wasserman 2005.rev.d , 72 , 023513 hindmarsh1994 apj 431 , 534 perivolaropoulos simatos 1998 astro - ph/9803321 jeong smoot 2005 apj 624 , 21 lo wright astro - ph/0503120 seljak slosar 2006 phys.rev.d 74, 063523 pogosian wasserman wyman m 2006 astro - ph/0604141 fraisse ph/0603589 kaiser n stebbins a 1984 nature 310 , 391 vilenkin shellard 1994 cosmic strings topological defects cambridge cambridge university press grski m. 2005 apj 622 , 759 | 0.43535 | 2,770 | 1,430 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,042 | using a sample of @xmath0 @xmath1 decays , fermilab experiment 789 has studied production of @xmath2 and @xmath3 in 800gev proton - nucleon collisions . differential cross sections and nuclear dependences have been measured for charmonium as well as for charm and beauty production .
while charm and beauty production are consistent with perturbative qcd calculations , charmonium cross sections exceed the predictions of the color - singlet model by large factors , suggesting that additional mechanisms ( such as color - octet production ) may play important roles .
nuclear dependences of production cross sections may offer a new tool for the detailed understanding of charmonium production .
= 20000 | fermilab experiment 789 is a study of two - prong decays of beauty and charm which took data during the 1990/1 fixed - target run .
e789 has published the most precise measurement of the charm production cross section and its @xmath4 dependence in 800gev proton collisions,@xcite as well as novel measurements at very forward @xmath5 of the @xmath2 production cross section and its @xmath4 dependence using our beam dump ( or a beryllium insert just upstream of the beam dump ) as the target.@xcite more recent results include the only measurement to date of the cross section for beauty production in proton collisions at fixed - target energy,@xcite observed via the process @xmath6 , and high - statistics studies of @xmath2 and @xmath3 production.@xcite
the e789 apparatus ( shown schematically in fig . [ fig : e789 ] ) has been described in detail elsewhere@xcite ; we summarize briefly here .
it is based on the pre - existing e605/772 spectrometer,@xcite upgraded for this run by the addition of two silicon - microstrip vertex telescopes ( fig .
[ fig : ssd789 ] ) , one above and one below the beam , replacement of the station-1 mwpcs with drift chambers , and a tenfold increase in data - recording capacity ( to 50mb / spill ) .
wire - like targets were used to localize the primary - interaction vertex in @xmath7 and @xmath8 , so that only the decay vertex need be reconstructed .
= 2.87 in = 2.54 in the spectrometer features two large analysis magnets , sm12 and sm3 , which deflect charged particles in opposite directions in @xmath7 .
a water - cooled copper beam dump suspended within sm12 absorbs non - interacting beam protons as well as secondaries emitted within @xmath9@xmath10mr of the beam in @xmath7 . shielding within and around sm12 absorbs neutral secondaries .
this geometry limits the pair acceptance to @xmath91% but allows operation at high interaction rates .
the vertex telescopes and the 23 planes of scintillation - counter hodoscopes and drift chambers at stations 1 , 2 , and 3 measure the tracks of charged particles passing above or below the beam dump . the sm3 magnet serves to remeasure charged - particle momenta and thus to confirm the target origin of tracks , allowing the copious background of muons created within the beam dump to be rejected .
particles are identified by electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters , scintillation - hodoscope and proportional - tube muon detectors , and a ring - imaging cherenkov counter . in most events
only two oppositely - charged particle tracks traversing the spectrometer are fully reconstructed , one passing through each vertex telescope .
data were taken separately in charm and beauty spectrometer settings . in the charm running we were able to operate the spectrometer at interaction rates up to 5mhz , using an on - line vertex trigger processor@xcite to reject @xmath1180% of hadron pairs from the target .
the higher sm12 current used in the beauty setting allowed @xmath2 and @xmath3 data to be taken at a 50mhz interaction rate , with no on - line vertex cut needed .
we have measured differential cross sections for charm@xcite and charmonium@xcite production .
charm data were taken using gold and beryllium targets at sm12 currents of 900 and 1000 amperes .
[ fig : d - peak ] shows the observed hadron - pair mass distributions ( under the @xmath12 and @xmath13 assumptions mass region and was not used in this analysis . ] ) for the various e789 charm data samples , using two different decay - vertex cuts .
clear @xmath14 signals stand out above the dihadron background .
the looser vertex cuts ( @xmath15 ) were found to optimize the statistical significance of the signal and were used in the cross - section and @xmath4-dependence analyses .
= 2.4 in = 2.65 in our narrow range of acceptance in the longitudinal momentum of the pair ( due to the beam - dump and shielding geometry ) precludes a direct measurement of total cross section .
we measure@xcite the @xmath16 differential cross section @xmath17b / nucleon at @xmath18 .
this can be extrapolated over all @xmath5 ( using the @xmath5 shape measured by previous experiments@xcite ) to give a total @xmath16 cross section @xmath19b / nucleon.@xcite averaging with previous measurements using 800gev proton beams@xcite gives @xmath20b / nucleon , consistent with next - to - leading - order ( nlo ) qcd predictions@xcite within the broad range of theoretical uncertainty .
[ fig : mumu - mass ] also shows the dimuon mass distribution from the beauty running , and figs .
[ fig : psi - pt ] and [ fig : psip - pt ] compare our measured @xmath2 and @xmath3 differential cross sections with qcd predictions.@xcite here there is little uncertainty in the extrapolation over @xmath5 , with the @xmath5 shape well determined both by these open - aperture " data alone and in combination with our beam - dump data,@xcite as indicated in fig .
[ fig : psi - xf ] . as at the tevatron
collider,@xcite @xmath2 and @xmath3 production are substantially underestimated in the qcd calculation , with phenomenological @xmath21 factors " of 7 and 25 ( respectively ) required to give agreement in magnitude between data and theory . note that the model calculation includes only contributions from color - singlet charmonium states and neglects possible contributions from color - octet charmonium components@xcite and from postulated states above @xmath22 threshold.@xcite ( these discrepancies have been the subject of much attention and are discussed further in sec . 5 .
) we find@xcite @xmath23nb / nucleon and @xmath24nb / nucleon .
comparison with previous results@xcite@xmath25@xcite ( fig .
[ fig : sdep ] ) shows that the @xmath2 total cross section and its excitation curve are by now well determined experimentally .
= 3.75 in = 3.75 in = 3.75 in = 3.75 in
nuclear dependences of production cross sections can shed light on production mechanisms and thus are of intrinsic interest .
in addition , suppression of charmonium production in nucleus - nucleus collisions has been proposed as a signature for quark - gluon - plasma formation,@xcite so it is important to study processes responsible for charmonium suppression in proton - nucleus collisions , which might present a background to a quark - gluon - plasma signal .
the production of heavy quarks is naively expected to depend linearly on the atomic weight ( @xmath4 ) of the target nucleus , since the dominant qcd mechanisms ( gluon - gluon fusion and @xmath26 annihilation ) involve hard partons.@xcite however , in fermilab e772 we showed@xcite that charmonium production in proton - nucleus collisions in fact has a complicated dependence on @xmath4 , parametrized as @xmath27 , suggesting that other processes are at work in addition to those of perturbative qcd . the concentration of our charm sample in a narrow range of feynman-@xmath28 results in the most precise determination to date of the charm - production nuclear dependence at a point in @xmath5 , allowing a precise comparison to be made between open - charm and charmonium production . to augment the forward-@xmath5 @xmath4-dependence measurements of e772
, we took additional @xmath2 data in e789 , using a rotating wheel of beryllium , carbon , and tungsten targets placed 1.27 m downstream of the usual target position in order increase the acceptance near @xmath29 .
[ fig : negjpsi ] shows the dimuon mass distributions thus obtained and the resulting @xmath4-dependence exponent @xmath30 _ vs. _
@xmath5 for @xmath2 compared with that for @xmath31 .
we see that ( at least at small @xmath5 ) @xmath30 is significantly lower for charmonium than for charm : @xmath31 production depends linearly on @xmath4 ( @xmath32 at @xmath33),@xcite while for the @xmath2 , @xmath34.@xcite = 3.3 in = 3.3 in the increased nuclear suppression at low @xmath5 of charmonium as compared to charm is consistent with models in which charmonium production is suppressed in nuclei due to dissociation by interaction with co - moving partons.@xcite models in which the nuclear suppression of charmonium production is an initial - state effect ( _ e.g . _ due to possible shadowing or nuclear modification of the gluon structure function ) are disfavored , since they would predict similar nuclear dependences for @xmath2 and @xmath35 production .
effects on charmonium production at large @xmath5 due to intrinsic charm@xcite ( the presence of virtual @xmath36 pairs in the nucleon sea ) and initial - state parton energy loss@xcite have also been postulated .
the predictions of the intrinsic - charm model have not been borne out by our data since they feature significantly larger ( and more strongly @xmath4-dependent ) cross - section contributions at the largest @xmath5 than are seen.@xcite the qualitative trend we observe at large @xmath5 ( nuclear suppression increasing with @xmath5 ) is successfully accomodated in models which take account of parton energy loss@xcite in traversing nuclear matter . since gluons should interact more strongly with matter than quarks , the parton energy - loss model makes the intriguing prediction that at the highest feynman-@xmath28 ( where @xmath37 annihilation dominates over gluon - gluon fusion ) , the nuclear suppression should decrease.@xcite the apparent increase of @xmath30 at @xmath38 suggests that this may be occurring , but better statistics are needed for confirmation ; these should be forthcoming from fermilab e866 , which is to take data during the 1996/7 fixed - target run .
production of charm@xcite and beauty@xcite quarks is in reasonable agreement with perturbative qcd calculations . on the other hand , production of charm and beauty _ quarkonia _
are observed at rates from one to two orders of magnitude higher than naively predicted .
the experimental facts of enhanced quarkonium production in fixed - target experiments are not new , dating back to the mid-1970s when @xmath2 hadroproduction was first observed . at that time
it was realized that lowest - order production of @xmath36 in a color - singlet state ( via one intermediate virtual photon or three virtual gluons ) had difficulty accounting for the large cross sections measured,@xcite and the color evaporation"@xcite ( or local - duality ) mechanism achieved currency : the @xmath36 pair could be produced in a colored state and later emit a soft gluon to neutralize its color at little or no cost in probability .
recent advances in perturbative qcd have made the predictions of the color - singlet model computable with no free parameters,@xcite allowing it to be definitively ruled out by both fixed - target and collider@xcite measurements . in the regime accessible to fixed - target experiments , questions may still remain as to the applicability of factorization and the role of intrinsic parton @xmath39 .
but the collider data in the previously - inaccessible regime of @xmath40 ( where perturbative calculations ought to be most trustworthy ) have forced theorists to consider seriously additional non - perturbative mechanisms . as a result , the leading candidate models which have emerged are the color - octet model@xcite and an updated color - evaporation model.@xcite these models , while less predictive than the color - singlet model , nevertheless make strong predictions ( for example , that @xmath2 s should be highly polarized at high @xmath41 ) , which can be tested in detail in upcoming experiments . in this connection
we mention fermilab e866 , which should record @xmath42 @xmath1 decays ( in closed aperture ) in the upcoming run , as well as the c0 charm project,@xcite in which a sample of @xmath43 @xmath2 decays could be accumulated , with ( due to the open geometry ) most final - state particles accompanying the @xmath2 also measured .
thus c0 charm holds the possibility of high - statistics measurements of @xmath44 ( as well as @xmath2 , @xmath3 , and open - charm ) production at fixed - target energy
. further data on @xmath4 dependences could also be useful .
energy loss in nuclear matter may be a means to distinguish color - singlet and color - octet charmonium states , since the color - octet state has gluonic quantum numbers and may be strongly absorbed.@xcite distinguishing initial- and final - state @xmath4-dependence mechanisms calls for more data on the @xmath4 dependence of open - charm production at large @xmath5 , another area in which c0 charm could contribute .
m. l. mangano , phenomenology of quarkonium production in hadronic collisions , " hep - ph/9507353 , in _ proc .
xth topical workshop on proton - antiproton collider physics _ ,
fermilab , batavia il , may 913 , 1995 , r. raja and j. yoh , _ eds .
_ , aip conference proceedings 357 , american inst .
( 1996 ) , p. 120 .
see for example m. w. bailey ( cdf collaboration ) , charmonium and bottomonium production in @xmath46 collisions at cdf , " fermilab - conf-96/235-e , to appear in _ proc . 1996 meeting of the division of particles and fields , american physical society _ , minneapolis , mn , august 1015 , 1996 .
see for example k. a. bazizi ( d0 collaboration ) , inclusive @xmath47 quark and heavy quarkonium production at d0 , " in _ proc .
xth topical workshop on proton - antiproton collider physics _ ,
fermilab , batavia il , may 913 , 1995 , r. raja and j. yoh , _ eds .
_ , aip conference proceedings 357 , american inst .
( 1996 ) , p. 105 . c. n. brown _ et al .
_ , expression of interest for a high - sensitivity charm experiment at c0 , " d. m. kaplan , spokesperson , july 9 , 1996,http://fnphyx - www.fnal.gov / conferences / ftp_home / charm2000/c0_charm.ps .
r. wittmann and u. heinz , z. phys .
c * 59 * , 77 ( 1993 ) ; + p. l. mcgaughey , to appear in _ proc .
quark matter 96 , 12th international conference on ultra - relativistic nucleus - nucleus collisions _ , heidelberg , germany , may 2024 , 1996 . | fermilab experiment 789 study two - prong decays beauty charm data 1990/1 fixed - target run published precise measurement charm production cross section @xmath4 dependence in 800gev proton collisions novel measurements forward @xmath5 @xmath2 production cross section @xmath4 dependence beam dump target recent results include only measurement cross section beauty production proton collisions fixed - target energy @xmath6 high - statistics studies @xmath2 @xmath3 production e789 apparatus described based on e605/772 spectrometer upgraded two silicon - microstrip vertex telescopes replacement station-1 mwpcs with drift chambers tenfold increase data - recording capacity to 50mb / spill wire - like targets localize primary - interaction vertex @xmath7 @xmath8 decay vertex reconstructed spectrometer features two large analysis magnets sm12 sm3 deflect charged particles opposite directions @xmath7 water - cooled copper beam dump within sm12 absorbs non - interacting beam protons secondaries @xmath9 beam shielding sm12 absorbs neutral secondariesgeometry limits pair acceptance to @xmath91% allows operation high interaction rates vertex telescopes 23 scintillation - counter hodoscopes drift chambers at stations 1 2 3 measure tracks charged particles beam dump sm3 magnet particle momenta target origin particles identified by electromagnetic hadronic calorimeters scintillation - hodoscope - tube muon detectors ring - imaging cherenkov counter two oppositely - charged particle tracks reconstructed one each data taken in charm beauty spectrometer settings interaction rates up to 5mhz - vertex trigger processor @xmath1180% hadron pairs higher sm12 current beauty setting allowed @xmath2 @xmath3 data at 50mhz interaction rate no on - line vertex cut needed measured differential cross sections for charm@xcite charmonium@xcite production data gold beryllium targets at sm12 currents 900 1000 amperes fig shows hadron - pair mass distributions for e789 charm data samples decay - vertex @xmath14 signals stand above dihadron backgroundlooser vertex cuts @xmath15 optimize statistical significance used in cross - section @xmath4-dependence analyses 2.4 2.65 narrow acceptance longitudinal momentum beam - dump shielding geometry precludes direct measurement total cross section measure @xmath16 differential cross section @xmath17b / nucleon at @xmath18 extrapolated over @xmath5 total @xmath16 cross section @xmath19b / nucleon averaging with previous measurements 800gev proton beams gives @xmath20b / nucleon consistent with qcd predictions theoretical uncertainty - shows dimuon mass distribution compare @xmath2 @xmath3 differential cross sections with qcd predictions little uncertainty in extrapolation over @xmath5 shape determined by open - aperture data beam - dump data tevatron collider @xmath2 @xmath3 production underestimated in qcd calculation phenomenological @xmath21 factors of 7 and 25 required agreement magnitude data model calculation includes contributions from color - singlet charmonium states neglects color - octet charmonium components postulated states above @xmath22 threshold@xcite discrepancies subject attention discussed in sec 5 find @xmath23nb @xmath24nb / nucleon comparison with previous results fig shows @xmath2 cross section excitation curve determined experimentally 3.75 nuclear dependences production cross sections light production mechanisms interest suppression charmonium production in collisions proposed signature for quark - gluon - plasma formation important study processes charmonium suppression proton - nucleus collisions background quark - gluon - plasma signal production of heavy quarks depend on atomic weight @xmath4 target nucleus dominant qcd mechanisms gluon fusion annihilation involve hard partons fermilab e772 showed charmonium production in proton - nucleus collisions complicated dependence on @xmath4 parametrized @xmath27 other processes work concentration charm sample in range feynman-@xmath28 precise determination charm - production nuclear dependence @xmath5 precise comparison between open - charm charmonium productionforward-@xmath5 @xmath4-dependence measurements e772 additional @xmath2 data e789 rotating wheel beryllium carbon tungsten targets 1.27 m downstream target position increase acceptance near @xmath29 fig negjpsi shows dimuon mass distributions @xmath4-dependence exponent @xmath30 vs @xmath5 @xmath2 @xmath31 small @xmath5 @xmath30 lower charmonium charm @xmath31 production depends on @xmath4 @xmath32 @xmath33)@xcite @xmath2 @xmath34 = 3.3 increased nuclear suppression low @xmath5 charmonium charm consistent models charmonium production dissociation - moving partons models nuclear suppression initial - state effect gluon disfavored predict similar nuclear dependences @xmath2 @xmath35 production effects charmonium production @xmath5 intrinsic charm initial - state parton energy loss postulated predictions intrinsic - charm model not borne out data larger strongly @xmath4-dependent cross - section contributions largest @xmath5 qualitative trend large @xmath5 nuclear suppression increasing @xmath5 accomodated in models parton energy loss traversing nuclear mattergluons interact with matter than quarks parton energy - loss model highest feynman-@xmath28 @xmath37 annihilation over gluon - gluon fusion nuclear suppression decrease increase of @xmath30 at @xmath38 suggests better statistics needed for from fermilab e866 data during 1996/7 fixed - target run production of charm beauty quarks with perturbative qcd calculations production of charm beauty quarkonia observed at rates one to two orders higher than predicted enhanced quarkonium production in fixed - target experiments not new mid-1970s @xmath2 hadroproduction lowest - order production of @xmath36 in color - singlet state difficulty for large cross sections color evaporation mechanism @xmath36 pair produced in colored state soft gluon to color advances in perturbative qcd predictions color - singlet model computable with no free parameters ruled out by fixed - target and collider@xcite measurements questions remain applicability of factorization role of intrinsic parton @xmath39 collider data in regime @xmath40 forced theorists to consider additional non - perturbative mechanismsleading models color - octet model@xcite updated color - evaporation model models less predictive make strong predictions @xmath2 highly polarized at high @xmath41 tested upcoming experiments fermilab e866 record @xmath42 @xmath1 decays c0 charm project sample of @xmath43 @xmath2 decays accumulated final - state particles @xmath2 measured c0 charm holds possibility high - statistics measurements of @xmath44 @xmath2 @xmath3 open - charm production at fixed - target energy further data on @xmath4 useful energy loss in nuclear matter distinguish color - singlet color - octet charmonium states - octet gluonic quantum numbers strongly absorbed distinguishing initial final - state @xmath4-dependence mechanisms calls more data on @xmath4 dependence open - charm production at @xmath5 mangano quarkonium production in hadronic collisions - ph/9507353 workshop proton - antiproton collider physics fermilab batavia 1995 raja yoh aip conference proceedings 357 american 1996 p. 120bailey cdf collaboration charmonium bottomonium production @xmath46 collisions cdf fermilab - conf-96/235-e 1996 meeting division particles fields american physical society minneapolis mn august 1015 1996 bazizi d0 collaboration @xmath47 quark quarkonium production d0 xth workshop proton - antiproton collider physics fermilab batavia may 913 1995 raja j yoh aip conference proceedings 357 american inst 1996 p. 105 brown interest high - charm experiment c0 kaplan spokesperson july 9 1996.fnal.gov conferences charm2000/c0_charm wittmann u heinz z. 59 77 1993 l mcgaughey quark matter 96 12th international conference ultra - relativistic nucleus nucleus collisions heidelberg germany may 2024 1996 | 0.505861 | 3,370 | 1,736 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,043 | using unimproved and non - perturbatively @xmath0 improved wilson fermions , results are given for the three lowest moments of unpolarised nucleon structure functions .
renormalisation , chiral extrapolation and the continuum limit of the matrix elements are briefly discussed .
the simulations are performed for both quenched and two flavours of unquenched fermions .
no obvious sign of deviation from linearity in the chiral extrapolations are found .
( this is most clearly seen in our quenched unimproved data , which extends to lighter quark mass . )
possible quenching effects also seem to be small .
the lowest moment thus remains too large , so it seems to be necessary to reach smaller quark masses in numerical simulations .
15.0 true cm | much of our knowledge about _ qcd _ and the structure of the nucleon has been derived from deep inelastic scattering ( _ dis _ ) experiments , either @xmath1 ( @xmath2 ) via the exchange of a photon or @xmath3 , @xmath4 via @xmath5 or @xmath6 respectively .
the cross section is determined by the structure functions @xmath7 and additionally for neutrino _ dis _ , @xmath8 .
considering non - singlet ( _ ns _ or @xmath9 ) combinations only to avoid any extra gluon terms , the operator product expansion relates moments of these structure functions to nucleon matrix elements @xmath10 as @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the wilson coefficient and @xmath13 is proportional to the matrix element of @xmath14 .
@xmath15 is a quark bilinear form , involving a @xmath16-matrix and @xmath17 covariant derivatives ( see @xcite for our conventions ) .
this ` renormalisation group invariant ' ( _ rgi _ ) form gives a clean separation between a non - perturbative _ number _ @xmath13 ( which can be computed on the lattice ) and a _ function _
@xmath18 ( which is perturbatively known ) .
this is a possible _ direct _ comparison between the experimental result and the lattice result .
more practical at present , however , is to use _ parton density _ functions ( e.g. _ mrs _ , @xcite ) determined from _ global _ fits and related to the structure function by a _ convolution_. finally , in a scheme @xmath19 at scale @xmath20 then @xmath21 with @xmath22^{-1 } \equiv \left [ 2b_0 g^{\cal s}(m)^2 \right]^{- { d_{{\cal o};0}\over 2b_0 } } } & & \nonumber
\\ & & \times \exp{\left\ { \int_0^{g^{\cal s}(m ) } d\xi \left [ { \gamma^{\cal s}_{\cal o}(\xi ) \over \beta^{\cal s}(\xi ) } + { d_{{\cal o};0}\over b_0 \xi } \right ] \right\ } } , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] which in the @xmath23 scheme with @xmath24 from @xcite at @xmath25 gives for quenched @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 ( @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 respectively ) while for unquenched , @xmath32^{-1 } \sim 0.695(10)$ ] .
the euclideanisation and form of the @xmath15 has been described in @xcite : @xmath33 can be determined with nucleon momentum @xmath34 , while @xmath35 , @xmath36 and @xmath37 need a three - momentum with one non - zero component . by considering the _ ns _ term
the difficult to compute one - quark - line - disconnected terms cancel .
a given operator can mix with three different classes of operators ( with the same quantum numbers under the hypercubic group ) : [ a ] of higher dimension ; [ b ] the same dimension ; [ c ] lower dimension . at present
the @xmath0 improvement operators ( class [ a ] ) are only known for @xmath38 .
the associated improvement coefficients are not completely known , @xcite . for @xmath36 and @xmath37
there are additionally two mixing operators belonging to class [ b ] and for @xmath37 a further operator in class [ c ] .
for @xmath38 we have found that the numerical values of the improvement terms are much smaller than the operator itself ; thus dropping them will cause only an insignificant error .
renormalisation can be considered in the @xmath39 scheme both perturbatively and non - perturbatively , @xcite , by defining @xmath40 from @xmath41 = \langle q(p ) | { \cal o}^{{\mbox{\tiny $ born$ } } } | q(p ) \rangle , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] at @xmath42 .
perturbation theory gives @xmath43 + o(g_0 ^ 4 ) , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have now computed @xmath44 for a general value of @xmath45 , @xcite .
the perturbative renormalisation constant for the first mixing term for @xmath36 has also been computed ; it turns out to be very small .
numerically this term is also smaller than the @xmath36 matrix element so we shall also drop it .
problems arise with the remaining mixing terms though : the born term ( between quark states ) vanishes , making their determination using only quark states impossible . at the present stage of development
we shall simply ignore these extra terms . practically for the operator renormalisation we shall use a variant of ` tadpole
improved , renormalisation group improved , boosted perturbation theory ' , ( _ ti - rgi - bpt _ ) , @xmath46 @xmath47^{d_{{\cal o};0}\over 2b_0 } \times } & & \nonumber \\ & & \left [ 1 + { b_1 \over b_0 } g^2_{{\box } } \right]^ { { b_0 d_{{\cal o};1}^{{\box } } - b_1 d_{{\cal o};0 } \over 2 b_0b_1 } + { { p_1 \over 4 } { b_0 \over b_1 } ( 1-n_d ) } } , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( where @xmath48 is the number of derivatives in the operator , @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 is the first perturbative coefficient in @xmath52 ) .
@xmath53 in the ` @xmath54 ' scheme may be found from the known @xmath55 ( from @xmath56 ) .
results for unimproved quenched fermions are shown in fig . [ fig_v2b_v3+v4_momms_nf0_rgi_lat01 ] and compared with the non - perturbative method , @xcite .
reasonable agreement is seen .
= 7.00 cm [ fig_v2b_v3+v4_momms_nf0_rgi_lat01 ]
there have recently been suggestions @xcite for the behaviour of @xmath57 close to the chiral limit , @xmath58 \end{array } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] rather than a linear form : @xmath59 .
we check this using quenched unimproved results ( because this data extends down to lighter quark mass ) in fig .
[ fig_x1u - d_wilson_rgi_lat01 ] .
= 7.00 cm [ fig_x1u - d_wilson_rgi_lat01 ] although not conclusive , it would seem that presently linear fits are adequate and any possible non - linearities can only show up at rather small quark mass outside the present range of data .
we first consider the continuum limit using quenched @xmath0 improved fermions ( at @xmath60 @xmath61 , @xmath62 , @xmath63 ) after taking the chiral limit . in fig .
[ fig_x1b+x2+x3_aor02_lat01 ] we show the results .
the data for the higher moments is unfortunately rather noisy .
= 7.00 cm [ fig_x1b+x2+x3_aor02_lat01 ] finally we consider _ unquenched _ results . in fig .
[ fig_x1b_1u-1d.p0_mpi2+a2_nf2_lat01 ] we use a fit function = 7.00 cm [ fig_x1b_1u-1d.p0_mpi2+a2_nf2_lat01 ] ansatz @xmath64 for @xmath0 improved fermions with @xmath65 data sets . there is no obvious difference to the _ quenched result _ which is surprising , @xcite .
while for quenched _ qcd _ we expect that the sea term is suppressed giving too large a quark contribution , this is not so for unquenched _
qcd_. in conclusion the results presented here would seem to indicate that we have to be much closer to the chiral limit in order to be able to perceive the partonic properties of the nucleon .
further details will be given in @xcite .
the numerical calculations were performed on the hitachi _ sr8000 _ at lrz ( munich ) , the cray _
t3e_s at epcc ( edinburgh ) , nic ( jlich ) and zib ( berlin ) as well as the ape / quadrics at nic ( zeuthen ) .
we wish to thank the _ ukqcd _ collaboration for sharing their unquenched configurations with us . | knowledge about qcd _ structure nucleon derived from deep inelastic scattering experiments @xmath1 exchange photon @xmath3 @xmath5 cross section determined by structure functions @xmath7 neutrino dis @xmath8 considering non - singlet @xmath9 combinations operator product expansion relates structure functions to nucleon matrix elements @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 wilson coefficient @xmath13 proportional to matrix element @xmath14 @xmath15 is quark bilinear form @xmath16-matrix @xmath17 covariant derivatives see @xcite renormalisation group invariant form gives clean separation between non - perturbative number @xmath13 function @xmath18 perturbatively known possible direct comparison between experimental result lattice result practical use parton density _ functions @xcite determined from global _ fits related to structure function by convolution_scheme @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22^{-1 } \equiv \left 2b_0 g^{\cal s}(m)^2 d_{{\cal o};0}\over 2b_0\nonumber \exp{\left \int_0^{g^{\cal s}(m ) d\xi\left \gamma^{\cal s}_\cal o}(\xi ) \beta^{\cal s}(\xi ) d_{{\cal o};0}\over b_0 \xi\nonumber\end{aligned} @xmath23 scheme @xmath24 @xmath25 quenched @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 unquenched @xmath32^{-1 } \sim 0.695(10)$ ] euclideanisation form @xmath15 described @xcite @xmath33 determined nucleon momentum @xmath34 @xmath35 need three - momentum one non - zero component compute one - quark - line - disconnected terms cancel operator mix three classes operators higher same lower dimension @xmath0 improvement operators known @xmath38 improvement coefficients not known@xmath36 @xmath37 two mixing operators class [ b ] @xmath37 further operator class [ c ] @xmath38 numerical values improvement terms smaller than operator dropping insignificant error renormalisation considered in @xmath39 scheme perturbatively non - perturbatively defining @xmath40 from @xmath41 = \langle q(p ) q(p\nonumber{aligned @xmath42 perturbation theory gives @xmath43 + o(g_0 ^ 4 ) \nonumber{aligned computed @xmath44 general value of @xmath45 perturbative renormalisation constant first mixing term @xmath36 computed small numerically term smaller than @xmath36 matrix element drop it problems with remaining mixing terms born term between quark states vanishes determination impossible ignore extra termsoperator renormalisation use variant tadpole improved renormalisation group improved boosted perturbation theory - rgi - bpt @xmath46 @xmath47\cal o;0\over 2b_0\nonumber\left 1 b_1 \over b_0^2\box b_0 d\cal;1 b_1 d o;0\over 2 b_0b_1 p_1 \over 4 } b_0 \over b_1 1-n_d )\nonumber{aligned @xmath48 number derivatives operator @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 first perturbative coefficient @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 scheme from @xmath55 @xmath56 results unimproved quenched fermions shown in fig ._v2b_v3+v4 compared with non - perturbative method agreement = 7.00 cm suggestions behaviour @xmath57 close chiral limit @xmath58 linear form @xmath59 check using quenched unimproved results data extends lighter quark mass fig . fig_x1u - d_wilson_rgi_lat017.00 cm [ fig_x1u - d_wilson_rgi_lat01 not conclusive linear fits adequate non - linearities small quark mass outside range data consider continuum limit using quenched @xmath0 improved fermions @xmath60 after chiral limit fig ._x1b+x2+x3_aor02_lat01 results data higher moments noisy 7.00 cm consider unquenched _ results fig._nf2_lat01 use fit function = 7.00 cm @xmath64 for @xmath0 improved fermions with @xmath65 data sets no obvious difference to quenched result _ surprising quenched qcd sea term suppressed large quark contribution not for unquenched qcd_ results indicate closer to chiral limit perceive partonic properties nucleon further details in @xcite numerical calculations performed on hitachi _ sr8000 _ at lrz ( munich cray _ t3e_s at epcc edinburgh nic zib ape / quadrics at nic ( zeuthen ) thank ukqcd _ collaboration for sharing unquenched configurations | 0.313617 | 2,015 | 1,064 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,047 | we discuss the properties of fragmentation functions arising from the interference of two leading hadrons produced inside the same jet in the current fragmentation region of a hard process . for the case of semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) , a proper folding of the cross section , integrated over the azimuthal position of the detected hadrons , produces a factorized form that allows for the extraction of the quark transversity distribution at leading twist .
using an extended spectator model , explicit calculations are shown for the hadron pair being two pions with invariant mass inside the @xmath0 resonance width . fragmentation functions ( ff ) , like distribution functions ( df ) , describe the nonperturbative properties of partons when confined inside hadronic bound states at a low scale .
factorization theorems for hard processes , whenever available , ensure their univsersality .
several df have been experimentally extracted and are parametrized with high accuracy . however , one of them , the quark transversity @xmath1 , is still unknown because it is connected to soft processes that flip chirality ; as such , it is , e.g. , unaccessible in inclusive dis . among alternative measurements ,
the single spin asymmetries in semi - inclusive dis seem more favourable .
in fact , a new generation of machines ( hermes , compass , erhic ) allows for a better resolution in the final state and precise semi - inclusive measurements are becoming feasible .
in this context , naive time - reversal odd ( for brevity , `` t - odd '' ) ff naturally arise because no constraints from time - reversal invariance can be imposed due to the existence of final state interactions ( fsi ) with or inside the residual jet @xcite .
some of these t - odd ff are also chiral odd , and they can be shown to represent the natural partner to isolate @xmath1 already at leading twist . in a field - theoretical description that assumes factorization , the soft processes linking the fragmenting quark to the observed hadron(s ) are defined as matrix elements of nonlocal operators involving quarks and gluons @xcite .
the simplest one at leading twist is the quark - quark correlator describing the decay of a quark @xmath2 into a detected hadron @xmath3 .
if the transverse momentum @xmath4 is measured with respect to the 3-momentum transfer @xmath5 and the quark is transversely polarized , a t - odd chiral - odd ff arises and allows for the extraction of @xmath1 via a single spin asymmetry ( the socalled collins effect ) @xcite .
however , due to the lack of collinear factorization the soft - gluon radiation needs to be taken into account and can lead to a severe suppression of the effect @xcite .
moreover , knowledge of the collins function implies the difficult task of modelling fsi between the observed hadron and the residual jet @xcite . from the theoretical point of view , it is more convenient to select processes where two leading hadrons @xmath6 and @xmath7 ( @xmath8 ) are detected in the same jet , that acts as a spectator @xcite . in this case ,
collinear factorization holds and the cross section would not be suppressed by sudakov form factors ; moreover , fsi are more easily modelled inside the pair .
if the two hadrons are unpolarized , four ff appear at leading twist : @xmath9 @xcite .
they depend on the light - cone quark momentum fractions @xmath10 delivered to the hadrons ( @xmath11 ) , on the transverse relative momentum @xmath12 ( with @xmath13 ) , on @xmath14 and @xmath15 @xcite .
each ff is also related to a specific spin state of the fragmenting quark : @xmath16 is the analogue of the collins effect ; on the contrary , @xmath17 represents a genuine new effect relating the transverse polarization of the fragmenting quark ( @xmath18 ) to the transverse relative dynamics of the detected pair ( @xmath19 ) , i.e. it is an `` analyzing power '' that transforms @xmath18 into the relative orbital angular momentum of the pair .
@xmath20 are t - odd and are nonvanishing only in the presence of residual fsi , at least between the two hadrons .
both @xmath21 are also chiral odd and can be identified as the chiral partner needed to access the transversity @xmath1 @xcite .
the cross section at leading twist for the process @xmath22 has been worked out in detail in ref . @xcite . here
, we will reconsider the case for an unpolarized beam and a transversely polarized target .
the lab frame can be defined by the plane containing the beam 3-momentum @xmath23 and the target polarization @xmath24 ( see fig . [ fig1 ] ) .
the scattering plane , which contains the scattered lepton 3-momentum @xmath25 and @xmath23 , is rotated by the azimuthal angle @xmath26 .
finally , the socalled hadronic plane , which contains @xmath27 and @xmath28 , is rotated by @xmath29 .
a further plane , which is just sketched in fig .
[ fig1 ] for sake of simplicity , contains @xmath30 and , consequently , @xmath19 ; it is rotated by @xmath31 with respect to the lab .
the nine - fold differential cross section depends on the energy fraction taken by the scattered lepton ( @xmath32 ) , on @xmath26 , on the quark light - cone momentum fraction @xmath33 of the target momentum @xmath34 , on @xmath35 and @xmath4 . since @xmath36 @xcite ,
the cross section can be more conveniently considered differential with respect to the pair invariant mass @xmath37 and @xmath38 . by integrating over the `` internal '' dynamics ( i.e. on @xmath39 ) and by properly folding the cross section over the experimental set of beam and hadron - pair azimuthal positions
@xmath26 and @xmath38 , it is possible to come to the factorized expression @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the electromagnetic fine structure constant , @xmath42 is the total energy in the center - of - mass frame , @xmath43 are the masses of the two observed hadrons , and a sum over the flavor @xmath44 of each quark and antiquark with charge @xmath45 is performed ( see also ref .
@xcite ) . in general
, the integrated function @xmath17 will depend on both @xmath46 and @xmath47 , contrary to the assumption proposed in ref .
@xcite .
it is worth noting also that eq .
( [ eq : finalx ] ) suggests a simpler measurement with respect to the case where only one hadron is detected .
in fact , here only the azimuthal position @xmath38 of the pair is required , while in order to measure the collins effect both the azimuthal angle and the @xmath48 hadron momentum need to be known ( see ref .
@xcite and references therein ) . +
a b c quantitative predictions for @xmath49 in eq .
( [ eq : finalx ] ) can be produced by extending the spectator model of ref .
@xcite to the case of the emission of a hadron pair . for the hadron pair being a proton and a pion ,
results have been published in ref .
@xcite , where fsi arise from the interference between the direct production and the roper decay . here
, results are shown for the case of two pions with invariant mass in the range @xmath50 $ ] , with @xmath51 mev and @xmath52 mev .
the spectator state has the quantum numbers of an onshell quark with constituent mass @xmath53 mev .
the quark decay at leading twist with the minimal number of vertices is represented by the set of diagrams shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] , where now t - odd ff arise from the contribution of diagram [ fig2]c through the interference between the direct production of the two @xmath54 and the @xmath0 decay .
explicit check has been made that the direct diagrams [ fig2]a and [ fig2]b qualitatively reproduce the experimental strength in the @xmath34- and @xmath55-channels , respectively , which represent most of the total @xmath56 production strength . in fig .
[ fig3 ] , @xmath57 \times h_1^ { { < \kern -0.3em \scriptscriptstyle { ) } } } ( z , m_h^2=m_\rho^2)$ ] of eq .
( [ eq : finalx ] ) is shown for the case @xmath58 .
it shows that a nonvanishing integrated interference ff survives allowing for the extraction of @xmath1 at leading twist , as suggested by eq .
( [ eq : finalx ] ) .
it is interesting to note that charge conservation for the diagrams of fig .
[ fig2 ] implies that the same results are obtained for the processes @xmath59 and @xmath60 , which differ just by the interchange @xmath61 .
therefore , the @xmath62-integrated amplitudes for the @xmath63 and @xmath64 quarks leading to the same @xmath65 final state cancel each other .
if only the valence quark content is considered for the proton ( @xmath66 ) and neutron ( @xmath67 ) targets , then the cross section at leading twist for the @xmath68 process turns out the same as for the @xmath69 one .
experimental tests of this conjecture could shed light both on the validiy of the spectator approximation and on the kinematical range where only the leading twist can be safely considered . | this work has been done in collaboration with a. bianconi ( univ .
brescia ) and r. jakob ( univ .
wuppertal ) . enlighting discussions with s. boffi ( univ .
pavia ) and d. boer ( riken - bnl ) are greatfully acknowledged . | work a bianconi univ brescia r. jakob univ wuppertal discussions s. boffi univ pavia d. boer riken - bnl acknowledged | 0.067785 | 69 | 37 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
197,049 | recent evidence for the existence of pentaquark @xmath0 particle from several experiments at several different laboratories around the world has caused great excitement and raised many unanswered questions .
we discuss a new , high resolution experiment searching for pentaquark states in hall c at jefferson lab using an untagged bremsstrahlung photon beam employing both the hydrogen and the deuterium targets by studying the following processes : @xmath1 , and @xmath2 .
this new experiment will significantly improve our current knowledge of the mass , the width of the @xmath0 particle if it is confirmed and provide unambiguous evidence for the existence or non - existence of the @xmath3 particle from the @xmath1 process . | the first evidence of the observation of a pentaquark @xmath0 particle came in early 2003 from the leps collaboration @xcite in which a sharp resonance was reported at a mass of @xmath4 ( gev)/c@xmath5 . the diana collaboration @xcite reported evidence for a resonance enhancement at @xmath6 mev / c@xmath5 and @xmath7 mev / c@xmath5 in the charge - exchange reaction @xmath8 . the clas collaboration @xcite reported a statistical significance of @xmath9 at the @xmath10 invariant mass peak of @xmath11 mev / c@xmath5 with a measured width of 21 mev for the reaction @xmath12 .
the saphir @xcite collaboration reported a peak at @xmath13 mev ( 4.8 @xmath14 confidence level ) and an upper limit of 25 mev for the width with a @xmath15 confidence level in the @xmath16 invariant mass distribution from the @xmath17 process .
the saphir collaboration also reported the absence of a signal in the @xmath18 invariant mass distribution in the @xmath19 reaction .
more recently , the hermes collaboration @xcite reported evidence of the @xmath0 particle from a deuterium target with the decay mode @xmath20 at @xmath21 ( mev ) with a width of 7.5 mev dominated by detector resolution
. the clas collaboration @xcite also reported evidence on @xmath0 from a hydrogen target from the @xmath22 process .
they found a peak in the invariant mass of @xmath23 at 1555 mev with a width of about 26 mev .
the cern na49 collaboration @xcite reported an exotic @xmath24 baryon resonance in proton - proton collisions with a mass of @xmath25 mev / c@xmath5 and width below the detector resolution of 18 mev / c@xmath5 in the @xmath26 , and @xmath27 invariant mass spectra .
these two states are believed to be candidates for the @xmath28 ( @xmath29 ) , and the @xmath30 ( @xmath31 ) pentaquark state , respectively . however , there is probably more evidence against the existence of the @xmath28 and @xmath30 pentaquark states @xcite .
mostly recently , the h1 collaboration reported @xcite evidence for a narrow anti - charmed baryon state , interpreting such a state as the pentaquark @xmath32 state . in summary , the experimental situation concerning the @xmath0 and @xmath3 pentaquark states is the following .
there is evidence from different experiments supporting the existence of the pentaquark @xmath0 state , but there is no evidence for the @xmath3 particle .
the mass of the @xmath0 particle is from 1527 mev to 1555 mev , and the width is found to be from 9 mev to 26 mev limited by detector resolutions . also , the existing data seem to suggest that the @xmath0 particle is an isoscalar particle . however , the existence of @xmath33 pentaquark is far from being confirmed experimentally @xcite .
one also needs to address possible experimental issues such as kinematic reflection @xcite due to the decay of higher mass mesons , such as the @xmath34 , the @xmath35 , and the @xmath36 .
the original chiral soliton model @xcite predicted a mass of 1530 mev and a total width of less than 15 mev for the @xmath0 particle .
it also predicted that the @xmath0 particle is a spin @xmath37 isoscalar particle and the predicted mass for the @xmath38 state is 2070 mev . in the correlated diquark picture by jaffe and wilczek @xcite ,
the diquarks qq are correlated in an antisymmetric color , flavor and spin state . in the case of the @xmath0 pentaquark state
, it is a bound state of two highly correlated @xmath39 pairs and an antiquark .
the narrowness of the width of the @xmath0 particle can be explained in this model by the weak coupling between the @xmath10 continuum and the bound state of the two diquark pairs and the antiquark , @xmath40^{2}\bar{s}$ ] .
one of the interesting predictions from this model , which differs from the chiral soliton model prediction , is the mass of the cascade isospin @xmath41 multiple @xmath42 ^ 2\bar{d})$ ] .
it is predicted to be around 1750 mev with a width about @xmath43 greater than that of the @xmath0 particle .
the @xmath0 particle was also hypothesized as an isotensor resonance to explain the observed narrow width of the @xmath0 particle @xcite via isospin - violating strong decays .
the hypothesis that @xmath0 is an isotensor particle implies the existence of @xmath44 , @xmath45 , @xmath46 , and @xmath47 states .
gerasyuta and kochkin @xcite calculated the mass spectra of the isotensor theta - pentaquarks with @xmath48 in a relativistic quark model .
the predicted mass for @xmath45 is 1575 mev ( 1761 mev ) for @xmath49 ( @xmath50 ) .
here we following the convention in the literature that @xmath51 represents the i=0 state in anti - decuplet , @xmath52 represents the i=1 state in 27-plet and @xmath53 the i=2 state in 35-plet . in the remaining of the paper
, we will not explicitly differentiate the @xmath45 and the @xmath54 states because the proposed experiment will not be able to determine which multiplet the observed @xmath3 particle belongs to .
walliser and kopeliovich @xcite investigated the implications of the @xmath0 exotic pentaquark for the baryon spectrum in topological soliton models .
they estimate the positions of other pentaquark and septuquark states with exotic and with non - exotic quantum numbers , particularly within the 27-plet baryon and the 35-plet multiplets in su(3 ) soliton model . in the 27-plet
, the @xmath55 multiple ( @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath54 ) are estimated to have a mass of 1.65 to 1.69 gev .
most recently , wu and ma @xcite studied the mass and width of the pentaquark @xmath52 states in the 27 baryon multiplet from chiral soliton model .
their calculations show that the mass of @xmath52 is about 1.61 gev and the width for the process @xmath58 is less than 44 mev .
et al . _
@xcite constructed a complete classification of @xmath59 states in terms of the flavor - spin su(6 ) representation and found that only the anti - decuplet , 27-plets and the 35-plets contain exotic states which can not be constructed by three quarks only . in this model ,
the ground state pentaquark is identified as the observed @xmath60 state , and is predicted to be an isosinglet anti - decuplet state .
the predicted masses for the excited exotic baryons are 1660 mev and 1775 mev . while it is important to determine the quantum number of the @xmath0 particle , particularly the spin and the parity and to search for other members in the exotic baryon family , it is more essential to confirm the existence of the @xmath0 particle with significantly improved statistics , and to determine its mass and the width more precisely .
karliner and lipkin @xcite derived an upper bound on the mass difference between the @xmath61 and @xmath0 based on simple assumptions about @xmath62 symmetry breaking and quantum mechanical variational method .
the resulting rather robust bound is more than 20 mev below the experimentally reported @xmath61 - @xmath0 mass difference .
it is also very important to verify definitely the non - existence or the existence of the @xmath3 particle and to search for the @xmath54 particle .
mass spectra for the proposed experiment . in this
simulation , physical events were generated from the @xmath63 process with a @xmath33 mass of 1540 mev ; the background is from @xmath64 pairs and an accidental coincidental rate .
, width=336 ] we proposed @xcite a new , high resolution search for pentaquark @xmath0 , @xmath3 and @xmath54 in hall c at jefferson lab using high resolution magnetic spectrometers in combination with a neutron counter by studying two different physical processes : the @xmath65 , where @xmath0 decays via @xmath66 , and the @xmath67 , where @xmath68 . due to the lack of a free neutron target
, a liquid deuterium target will be used for the @xmath69 process .
the @xmath70 particle will be detected in the short orbit spectrometer ( sos ) in coincidence with the @xmath71 and the neutron which will be detected in the high resolution kaon spectrometer ( hks ) , and the neutron counter , respectively . by detecting all three particles , the untagged bremsstrahlung photon energy ,
the mass of the @xmath0 particle , and the initial neutron momentum inside the deuteron can be reconstructed completely .
for the two - body process @xmath72 process one can not reconstruct the mass of the undetected @xmath3 ( @xmath54 ) particle from detecting @xmath70 particle only unless the energy of the incident real photon is known .
assuming the @xmath73 particle decays into @xmath71 and @xmath74 , the incident real photon energy can be reconstructed by detecting @xmath71 in coincidence with the @xmath70 particle .
such coincidence detection also suppresses backgrounds from other physical processes which have final states different from the @xmath75 final state .
the proposed experiment allows for the search of the @xmath3 ( @xmath54 ) particle in the mass range of 1500 mev to 1800 mev .
the primary sources of the physics backgrounds for the proposed @xmath67 process and the @xmath78 process are : ( i ) @xmath79 meson production , ( ii ) @xmath80 where , @xmath81 , and ( iii ) three - body final state @xmath82 production .
monte carlo simulations have been carried out to study these backgrounds , taking into account the momentum and angular resolutions of the two hadron spectrometers and their full momentum and angular acceptances . the spectrometer momentum and angle settings based on the two - body kinematics of the @xmath67 and the @xmath69 processes together with the reconstructed photon energy cut ( @xmath83 mev ) , where @xmath84 is the incident electron beam energy , effectively suppress the background contributions from the aforementioned physical processes .
cuts can be applied in the invariant mass of the @xmath85 ( @xmath16 ) system in order to suppress these backgrounds further .
simulations show that both the @xmath79 production and the @xmath86 channels are suppressed even without a 100 mev of @xmath87 cut and kinematic reflections are not issues for the proposed experiment . fig .
[ fig : thetaplus ] shows the projected result on the @xmath0 particle search .
the @xmath76 reaction will be used for the mass calibration .
the @xmath88 particle will be reconstructed by its decay into neutron and @xmath89 particle .
the neutron will be detected in the neutron counter in coincidence with the @xmath89 , and the mass of the @xmath88 particle will be reconstructed in a similar way as that of the @xmath0 particle . to suppress the background the @xmath71 particle will be detected in the sos spectrometer in coincidence with the neutron and the @xmath89 particle .
[ fig : calibration ] shows the simulated @xmath88 particle mass determination , which is better than 0.3 mev .
the upper panel shows the simulation result for the @xmath76 , @xmath77 reaction only , while the lower panel result includes accidental and other possible physical backgrounds .
this new experiment will determine the absolute mass of the @xmath0 particle to better than 0.5 mev and determine the @xmath0 particle width to better than 1.3 mev ( @xmath14 ) .
this work is supported by the u.s .
department of energy under contract number de - fg02 - 03er41231 .
the author thanks the yukawa institute for theoretical physics at kyoto university . discussions during the yitp workshop yitp - w-03 - 21 on `` multi - quark hadron : four , five and more ? '' were useful for the completion of this work . | pentaquark @xmath0 particle early 2003 leps collaboration sharp resonance mass @xmath4/c@xmath5 diana collaboration resonance enhancement @xmath6 mev @xmath7 mev charge - exchange reaction @xmath8 clas collaboration reported statistical significance @xmath9 @xmath10 mass peak @xmath11 mev /@xmath5 width 21 mev saphir peak @xmath13 mev 4.8 @xmath14 confidence level upper limit 25 mev width @xmath15 confidence level @xmath16 invariant mass distribution absence signal @xmath18 invariant mass distribution @xmath19 reaction hermes collaboration @xmath0 particle deuterium target decay mode @xmath20 @xmath21 width 7.5 mev detector resolution clas collaboration reported evidence @xmath0 hydrogen target peak mass @xmath23 1555 mev width 26 mev cern collaboration exotic @xmath24 baryon resonance proton - proton collisions mass @xmath25 mev /@xmath5 width below detector resolution 18 mev @xmath26 @xmath27 invariant mass spectratwo states believed candidates for @xmath28 @xmath30 ) pentaquark state more evidence against @xmath28 and @xmath30 pentaquark states @xcite h1 collaboration reported evidence for narrow anti - charmed baryon state as pentaquark @xmath32 state experimental situation @xmath0 @xmath3 pentaquark states evidence pentaquark @xmath0 state no evidence for @xmath3 particle mass @xmath0 particle 1527 mev to 1555 mev width 9 mev to 26 mev limited by detector resolutions existing data suggest @xmath0 particle isoscalar particle existence @xmath33 pentaquark far from confirmed experimentally possible experimental issues kinematic reflection due to decay of higher mass mesons original chiral soliton model predicted mass 1530 mev width less than 15 mev for @xmath0 particle particle spin @xmath37 isoscalar particle predicted mass for @xmath38 state 2070 mev correlated diquark picture diquarks in antisymmetric color flavor spin state@xmath0 pentaquark state bound of two @xmath39 pairs antiquark narrowness width @xmath0 particle explained by weak coupling between @xmath10 continuum bound state two diquark pairs antiquark @xmath40^{2}\bar mass of cascade isospin @xmath41 multiple @xmath42 around 1750 mev width @xmath43 greater than @xmath0 particle particle hypothesized isotensor resonance narrow width isospin - decays isotensor implies @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 states gerasyuta kochkin calculated mass spectra isotensor theta - pentaquarks with @xmath48 in relativistic quark model predicted mass for @xmath45 1575 mev ( 1761 mev ) @xmath49 ( @xmath50 ) @xmath51 represents i=0 state anti - decuplet @xmath52 i=1 state in 27-plet @xmath53 i=2 state 35-plet differentiate @xmath45 @xmath54 states proposed experiment determine which multiplet @xmath3 particle belongs towalliser kopeliovich investigated @xmath0 exotic pentaquark baryon spectrum soliton models estimate positions pentaquark septuquark states exotic non - exotic quantum numbers 27-plet baryon 35-plet multiplets su(3 ) soliton model 27-plet @xmath55 estimated mass 1.65 to 1.69 gev wu ma studied mass width pentaquark @xmath52 states in 27 baryon multiplet calculations show mass @xmath52 1.61 gev width @xmath58 less than 44 mev constructed classification @xmath59 states found anti - decuplet 27-plets 35-plets contain exotic states not constructed three quarks ground state pentaquark identified @xmath60 state predicted isosinglet anti - decuplet state predicted masses exotic baryons 1660 mev 1775 mev important determine quantum number @xmath0 particle spin parity search other members exotic baryon family confirm existence @xmath0 particle improved statistics determine mass width karliner lipkin derived upper bound mass difference between @xmath61 @xmath0 @xmath62 symmetry breaking quantum mechanical variational methodrobust bound 20 mev below @xmath61 - @xmath0 mass difference important verify @xmath3 particle search for @xmath54 particle mass spectra proposed experiment physical events from @xmath63 process @xmath33 mass 1540 mev background from @xmath64 pairs accidental coincidental rate proposed high resolution search for pentaquark @xmath0 @xmath54 in hall c jefferson lab high resolution magnetic spectrometers neutron counter studying two processes @xmath65 @xmath67 free neutron target liquid deuterium target for @xmath69 process @xmath70 particle detected in short orbit spectrometer with @xmath71 neutron detected in high resolution kaon spectrometer neutron counter detecting all three particles untagged photon energy mass @xmath0 particle initial neutron momentum reconstructed two - body process @xmath72 process reconstruct mass undetected @xmath3 ( ) particle @xmath70 particle unless energy incident real photon known @xmath73 particle decays into @xmath71 @xmath74 photon energy reconstructed by detecting @xmath71 @xmath70 particlecoincidence detection suppresses backgrounds from processes different from @xmath75 proposed experiment allows search @xmath3 ( ) particle in mass range 1500 to 1800 mev primary sources physics backgrounds for @xmath67 @xmath78 process are @xmath79 production @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 production monte carlo simulations backgrounds momentum angular resolutions hadron spectrometers spectrometer momentum angle settings based on reconstructed photon energy cut ( @xmath83 mev @xmath84 suppress background contributions from processes cuts can applied in invariant mass @xmath85 ( @xmath16 ) system to suppress backgrounds simulations show @xmath79 production and @xmath86 channels suppressed even without 100 mev of @xmath87 cut kinematic reflections not issues for experiment fig . shows projected result on @xmath0 particle search @xmath76 reaction used for mass calibration @xmath88 particle reconstructed by into neutron @xmath89 particle neutron detected in neutron counter with @xmath89 mass reconstructed similar as @xmath0 particlesuppress background @xmath71 particle detected sos spectrometer neutron @xmath89 particle fig calibration simulated @xmath88 particle mass determination better than 0.3 mev upper panel @xmath76 @xmath77 reaction lower panel accidental physical backgrounds new experiment absolute mass @xmath0 particle 0.5 mev @xmath0 particle width 1.3 mev supported u.s department energy contract de - fg02 - 03er41231 author thanks yukawa institute theoretical physics kyoto university discussions yitp workshop - - 21 multi - quark hadron useful completion work | 0.442003 | 2,881 | 1,544 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.