role stringclasses 2
values | content stringlengths 0 2.1k | session_id int64 10 21.7k | sequence_id int64 0 2.38k | annotations listlengths 0 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
volunteer | I'm sorry. | 4,385 | 202 | [] |
volunteer | Uh, but lines | 4,385 | 203 | [] |
volunteer | The transversal | 4,385 | 204 | [] |
volunteer | from congruent alternate interior angles. | 4,385 | 205 | [] |
volunteer | but uh you can use this statement, of course. | 4,385 | 206 | [] |
volunteer | I'm sorry. | 4,385 | 207 | [] |
student | To say that um to say the angle, BAC is congruent to PCD. | 4,385 | 208 | [] |
volunteer | Oh | 4,385 | 209 | [] |
volunteer | uh, can you please repeat? I'm sorry. | 4,385 | 210 | [] |
student | To say that CAD is congruent to ACD just like um we just proved. | 4,385 | 211 | [] |
volunteer | Yes, yes. | 4,385 | 212 | [] |
volunteer | Yeah, you can do that. | 4,385 | 213 | [] |
student | Um | 4,385 | 214 | [] |
volunteer | Um | 4,385 | 215 | [] |
student | it says that it like | 4,385 | 216 | [] |
student | it doesn't work because um they're either not alternate exterior angles or we haven't proven the applic applicable lines to be parallel. | 4,385 | 217 | [] |
volunteer | Uh, no. Oh, these are, which option did you choose, the last or the second last one? | 4,385 | 218 | [] |
student | Um, I just tried both, and that's what they say. | 4,385 | 219 | [] |
volunteer | How is that possible? So it says parallel lines cut by a transversal form congruent alternate interior angles, this should be true because | 4,385 | 220 | [] |
volunteer | um | 4,385 | 221 | [] |
volunteer | because we know that line BC is parallel to AD because this is given and we also know that AC acts as a transversal hair. So | 4,385 | 222 | [] |
volunteer | so your angle BCA should be congruent to CAD AD. | 4,385 | 223 | [] |
volunteer | because of this property. | 4,385 | 224 | [] |
volunteer | Um | 4,385 | 225 | [] |
volunteer | are you sure | 4,385 | 226 | [] |
student | Um, this is like also what I have so far, maybe like I'm missing something. | 4,385 | 227 | [] |
student | And then like when I click try it like says that um | 4,385 | 228 | [] |
student | it doesn't work for that proof. | 4,385 | 229 | [] |
volunteer | Mm | 4,385 | 230 | [] |
volunteer | Uh, can you share your screen if that's possible? | 4,385 | 231 | [] |
student | Um, how | 4,385 | 232 | [] |
volunteer | Mm. | 4,385 | 233 | [] |
volunteer | Oh, OK. Um | 4,385 | 234 | [] |
student | I said like a picture of my screen, like so far. | 4,385 | 235 | [] |
student | um, on the website. | 4,385 | 236 | [] |
student | below where we did the math. | 4,385 | 237 | [] |
volunteer | OK | 4,385 | 238 | [] |
volunteer | then you of other BCA | 4,385 | 239 | [] |
volunteer | is I went to CAD PCA. | 4,385 | 240 | [] |
volunteer | E C A C A D, OK. | 4,385 | 241 | [] |
volunteer | Uh panel lines set by transversal um form alternated interior angles. This is correct, and AC is AC is congruent to AC. | 4,385 | 242 | [] |
volunteer | uh reflexive property and then | 4,385 | 243 | [] |
volunteer | angle BAC and ACD. | 4,385 | 244 | [] |
volunteer | BAC | 4,385 | 245 | [] |
volunteer | B A C N A C D OK. | 4,385 | 246 | [] |
volunteer | Uh pal and cut patterns were still form concrete alternate interior angle. | 4,385 | 247 | [] |
volunteer | Yeah, this is, this is what I'm telling you. | 4,385 | 248 | [] |
volunteer | Uh, for your | 4,385 | 249 | [] |
student | So far, like up until question number 3, it says that everything is right. Um, step number 3, and then when it comes to step number 4, it's, that's when it gets wrong. | 4,385 | 250 | [] |
volunteer | Yeah, exactly. You, you can't say that this is like, I mean, over here, it's correct because say | 4,385 | 251 | [] |
student | OK | 4,385 | 252 | [] |
volunteer | uh this is a, this is, right? And you know that these signs are parallel, so this angle should be | 4,385 | 253 | [] |
volunteer | just a second | 4,385 | 254 | [] |
volunteer | This is your line. | 4,385 | 255 | [] |
volunteer | We can say that this angle will be equal to this angle because we know that these two lines are parallel and this acts as a transversal, but how can you say that this angle will be equal to this angle. We don't know whether A, B, and CD are parallel or not. | 4,385 | 256 | [] |
volunteer | So you can't use this seasoning over here. I mean, uh, the statement is correct, but the reasoning here is wrong. | 4,385 | 257 | [] |
volunteer | So. | 4,385 | 258 | [] |
volunteer | yeah. | 4,385 | 259 | [] |
student | Mm | 4,385 | 260 | [] |
volunteer | Mhm. | 4,385 | 261 | [] |
student | um | 4,385 | 262 | [] |
volunteer | Mm. | 4,385 | 263 | [] |
student | I'm | 4,385 | 264 | [] |
student | trying other possible reasonings, but | 4,385 | 265 | [] |
student | um | 4,385 | 266 | [] |
volunteer | Oh, what are the other questions? | 4,385 | 267 | [] |
student | there's none of them seem to work. | 4,385 | 268 | [] |
volunteer | Reflexive property won't work here. | 4,385 | 269 | [] |
volunteer | Uh | 4,385 | 270 | [] |
volunteer | that | 4,385 | 271 | [] |
student | Um, well, technically reflexive property. I don't think reflexive property would work because it has to be the same exact angle. | 4,385 | 272 | [] |
volunteer | Yeah, about to saying the same thing like it won't work. | 4,385 | 273 | [] |
volunteer | All right, I'm | 4,385 | 274 | [] |
student | Yeah, none of them work for that statement. | 4,385 | 275 | [] |
volunteer | this help to work. | 4,385 | 276 | [] |
volunteer | vertical angles are congruent, these are not vertical angles, in triangle angles opposite to confluent sides are congruent. | 4,385 | 277 | [] |
volunteer | Um. | 4,385 | 278 | [] |
volunteer | angles opposite to congruent sides. | 4,385 | 279 | [] |
volunteer | So do we know that these are consument sides. | 4,385 | 280 | [] |
volunteer | No, we don't know that, so. | 4,385 | 281 | [] |
volunteer | this will also not work. | 4,385 | 282 | [] |
volunteer | An angle bisector divides an angle into two congruent angles. | 4,385 | 283 | [] |
volunteer | but we also don't know whether this is an angle bisector or not. | 4,385 | 284 | [] |
volunteer | So that is also not a correct reasoning. | 4,385 | 285 | [] |
volunteer | if I also eliminate this | 4,385 | 286 | [] |
volunteer | and | 4,385 | 287 | [] |
volunteer | this also won't work | 4,385 | 288 | [] |
volunteer | uh exterior angles for exterior angles, what can we say? | 4,385 | 289 | [] |
volunteer | Um, these are not exterior angles. | 4,385 | 290 | [] |
volunteer | So this also won't work. | 4,385 | 291 | [] |
volunteer | So the only two options we have is transitive | 4,385 | 292 | [] |
volunteer | or substitution | 4,385 | 293 | [] |
volunteer | No | 4,385 | 294 | [] |
student | Um, when I used | 4,385 | 295 | [] |
student | both of them, none of them work. | 4,385 | 296 | [] |
volunteer | they don't, oh, they don't work. OK. | 4,385 | 297 | [] |
volunteer | Uh, OK. | 4,385 | 298 | [] |
student | No, maybe we have to do like a statement before we get to the statement. | 4,385 | 299 | [] |
volunteer | Um, so you are saying that we should change the statement. | 4,385 | 300 | [] |
student | yes | 4,385 | 301 | [] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.