Datasets:
license: other
language:
- en
pretty_name: ProcessBench
task_categories:
- visual-question-answering
tags:
- robotics
- embodied-ai
- benchmark
- vision-language-models
- process-understanding
- manipulation
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/processdata_sft.parquet
- split: eval
path: data/processbench_eval.parquet
ProcessBench
Dataset Summary
ProcessBench is a process-aware benchmark for vision-language robotic manipulation understanding. It evaluates whether VLMs can infer how a manipulation execution unfolds, including phase, contact, motion, bimanual coordination, primitive-local progress, temporal order, outcome, and primitive-level transitions.
This release contains 57,892 QA rows: 48,841 SFT rows and 9,051 evaluation rows across 12 task families and 260 manipulation tasks. The split follows strict episode / recording / scene isolation. The benchmark is derived from GM-100, RH20T, REASSEMBLE, and AIST-Bimanual.
Task Families
ProcessBench contains 12 diagnostic question families:
- T1 Phase Recognition: identify the current coarse process phase.
- T2 Contact Detection: determine whether task-relevant contact has occurred.
- T3 Motion Direction Prediction: infer the dominant motion direction from short temporal context.
- T4 Bimanual Coordination State: identify the current coordination state of two arms.
- T5 Primitive-local Progress: estimate progress within the current local manipulation step.
- T6 Motion State Recognition: distinguish actively moving from stationary states.
- T7 Operation Outcome Prediction: predict eventual success or failure from partial execution evidence.
- T8 Temporal Ordering: reconstruct the chronological order of shuffled observations.
- T9 Temporal Priority Prediction: decide which of two observations occurred earlier.
- T10 Current Primitive Recognition: identify the current low-level primitive.
- T11 Next Primitive Prediction: infer the next primitive from local process context.
- T12 Primitive Chain Restoration: restore a masked primitive in a local primitive chain.
Repository Contents
This release is organized around a minimal reviewable benchmark package:
splits/: SFT and Eval QA entries.metadata/: split statistics, task distribution, and license notes.examples/: rendered representative task cards examples.ProcessData-SFT-Qwen/: ProcessData-SFT-Qwen LoRA adapter weights and configurations.ProcessData-SFT-Qwen_results/: ProcessData-SFT-Qwen predictions and score summaries.benchmark_card.md: benchmark-level documentation.croissant.json: Croissant metadata with core and Responsible AI fields.
Full upstream videos and full frame dumps are not redistributed in this release.
SFT-Eval Split Reconstruction
Relevant Assets
- Public QA rows for
evalandsft. - Split manifests and split counts.
- Public release-relative references for each item.
How to use the public references
Each row exposes three reconstruction-oriented fields:
visual_refsource_episode_refreconstruction_key_json
These are designed to be stable, path-free references. They are sufficient to map a released item back to the corresponding source episode or recording once you have obtained the upstream dataset under its original terms.
Source-specific units
GM-100: grouped by(task_id, episode_id).RH20T: grouped byrecording_id.REASSEMBLE: grouped byrecording_id.AIST-Bimanual: grouped byrecording_id.
Expected workflow
- Obtain upstream datasets under their original terms.
- Use
source,source_task_id,source_unit_id,camera, andframe_indices_jsonfrom the public release. - Reconstruct the required visual inputs with the source-specific evaluation scripts in the main codebase.
Public QA fields Schema
item_id: Stable public item identifier.split:evalorsft.source:GM-100,RH20T,REASSEMBLE, orAIST-Bimanual.source_slug: Short source slug used in release-relative references.source_task_id: Source-side task identifier without local paths.source_unit_type: Split-isolation unit type, e.g.episodeorrecording.source_unit_id: Public unit identifier without local paths.task_id: Canonical paper task IDT1...T12.task_name: Canonical paper task name.task_type_legacy: Legacy engineering task name when it differs from paper naming.input_type: Public input format description.question: Public question text.choice_A...choice_F: Flattened answer choices.answer: Public answer label in the release schema.answer_text: Public answer text mapped fromanswer.num_choices: Number of non-null answer choices.num_frames: Number of referenced frames.frame_indices_json: JSON-encoded frame indices.display_labels_json: JSON-encoded panel labels such as["X", "Y"]or["X", "Z", "Y"].camera: Source camera identifier when available.arm_type: Source-side arm configuration tag when available.visual_ref: Release-relative visual reference string. This is not a local filesystem path.source_episode_ref: Release-relative source unit reference.reconstruction_key_json: Minimal JSON payload needed to reconstruct the sample with upstream data and source-specific scripts.task_meta_in_source: Whether source-side task metadata/context exists upstream.task_meta_public: Alwaysfalsein this release build. Separate structured task-meta fields are intentionally withheld.split_version: Current split version.split_group_id: Source-side split group identifier.builder_version: Public builder version tag.prompt_version: Public prompt-serialization version tag.sft_target: SFT-only supervised target string. Present only inprocessdata_sft.*.
Notes
T5is equivalent toT_progress.T8is equivalent toT_temporal.T9is equivalent toT_binary.T8is normalized into six explicit permutation choices so the public table remains flat and Parquet-friendly.T9is normalized toA/Bchoices even when the source data originally usedX/Y.
Prompt Templates
This file documents the public prompt serialization used by the current release build. Separate source-side task-meta prompting is intentionally disabled in this public release.
Standard multiple-choice template
{question}
A: {choice_A}
B: {choice_B}
...
Choose exactly one option label.
Output protocol:
- You may include brief reasoning before the final answer.
- The final line must be exactly: <ANSWER>A</ANSWER>
- Do not output anything after </ANSWER>.
T8 Temporal Ordering template
You are shown 3 frames from a robot manipulation task.
The frames are labeled X, Y, Z (these labels are arbitrary identifiers, not positional, and not time-ordered).
Determine the correct chronological order of these frames (from earliest to latest).
Choose exactly one 3-letter permutation, for example: YXZ means Y happened first, then X, then Z.
Output protocol:
- You may include brief reasoning before the final answer.
- The final line must be exactly: <ANSWER>XYZ</ANSWER>
- Do not output anything after </ANSWER>.
T9 Temporal Priority template
A single comparison image shows two labeled robot-manipulation panels from the same episode.
The left-right placement of the panels and the labels are arbitrary identifiers and do not indicate temporal order.
Which labeled panel happened earlier in the real manipulation sequence, X or Y?
Choose exactly one label: X or Y.
Output protocol:
- You may include brief reasoning before the final answer.
- The final line must be exactly: <ANSWER>X</ANSWER>
- Do not output anything after </ANSWER>.
License and Terms
This release uses license: other.
- Derived benchmark metadata in this release remains subject to upstream dataset terms.