Datasets:

Unnamed: 0
int64
0
3.88k
id
stringlengths
44
47
autor
stringclasses
181 values
title
stringlengths
2
71
rank
int64
1
5
maxRank
int64
5
5
source
stringclasses
1 value
summary
stringlengths
9
396
body
stringlengths
352
24.4k
2,600
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3646
JPastor
Shrek Tercero
1
5
muchocine
Shrek the third, or how fuck a saga.
This weekend I had the opportunity to watch a movie at the end to which wanted: Shrek the third, third of the trilogy which started brilliantly and in its second part was surprised with some outstanding new characters as a puss in boots exceptional folding with much grace by Antonio Banderas. However the third had never lead to film, and is a clear example of that for many technical efforts there of by means, the screenplay for a film is everything. The story of Shrek the third returns to take the stories of a lifetime to intersperse his characters in the argument, but on this occasion the side entering scene - almost all the tales of our childhood Portas - do not provide anything too interesting, and what is worse, not too helpful in the development of a story which seems to be an attempt to loop the loop of the first two parts. Shrek is so well managed that it sometimes seems that an actor behind which had just then modified with the editing program had: sense of animation is almost lost in some moments, and even donkey or Puss in boots get save with their jokes (rather poor) a script that is really sad. So much so that I finished not even see it, and this is something that a film of this size should have failed. I already talked in the past the Spanish animation and of how a much-publicized film then in the news (the pathetic "El sueño de una noche de San Juan") showed that good it team - and that movie was also very poor in execution - without a script you have nothing. They should have left quiet Shrek. Equal to that Neo and the fabulous Matrix, whose second and third parties ever had have existed.
2,601
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/478
Jeremy Fox
Monster house
4
5
muchocine
Once all the characters have been presented and the adventure has begun, the Viewer is caught in a roller coaster of emotions and adventures which, if I forgive the cliché, will delight children and adults.
There was a time in my childhood in which came without fail to the movies everytime premiered a film produced by Steven Spielberg. At that time was very involved in the process of realization of the films he produced and was (and is) inevitable to see his "touch" in films and classics like "Poltergeist", "Gremlins", "The secret of the pyramid" or "The Goonies".I do not know the degree of implication that his most gifted disciple, Robert Zemeckis and Spielberg have in the production of "Monster House", the directorial debut of Gil Kenan, of which both are executive producers. What I have to thank you all for them is that, for an hour and half, he has returned to revive those happy days of my childhood.And I find no better way to describe the film that tell you that it has enough of the spirit of the Goonies, but with more touches of terror (at least more than I expected), with logical technical advances (the film was shot using motion capture) and adapted to the current time and the possibilities of animation cinema (amazing how move the camera throughout the film).Against it could be argued that the premise is somewhat simplistic (three boys who discover that one of the houses of the neighborhood is actually a monster ready to devour all those they come to him) and that it takes a tad more than necessary, for my taste, to enter fully in the field. But little else can be blamed.Because once all the characters have been presented and the adventure has begun, the Viewer is caught in a roller coaster of emotions and adventures which, if I forgive the cliché, they will do the delights of small and larger. It's nice to see some children's characters are not childish, that are funny without being graciosillos and inspiring tenderness while one laughs with them. Even the dubbing of the film is good (for a time).In summary, the tape is a joy for the senses, fun, entertaining, visually amazing and has a good script. If that is not good cinema, I like the hat.
2,602
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1149
Silvia Giner
El truco final (The Prestige)
4
5
muchocine
Two artists, two magicians, confronted with a unique ending, to be the best. But there are battles in which there are no winners or losers, but the destruction that leaves his step combat in which all lose and gain something.
The Prestige (I refuse to call it the "the trick ending" is absurdísimo) is a film that shows how you can transform us obsession to the point of becoming people that we never believed to reach to become.Two artists, two magicians, confronted with a unique ending, to be the best. But there are battles in which there are no winners or losers, but the destruction that leaves his step combat in which all lose and gain something.This to see Batman (Christian Bale) and Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) converted to magicians is cane. I personally have a great weakness for Christian (for my taste more credible and better interpreted the story of batman), his performance as Borden is magnificent, slightly touching psychopathy. Looks sharp with the steel of the best swords, are you stuck in the pupils and do not let you see nothing more than it's not that karma that follows it in every scene. On this occasion not can Flay anyone, as I have already said that the actors are tremendous, tremendous is always the voluptuous and sexy Scarlett (learn Pataki), which is correct in all of his intentions.Although at one point the birds scene, can begin to reveal us which is the double face of the matter, could even have gone unnoticed, but is too emphasized the theme of doubles "that trick is only possible with a double" which be become already predictable, which just does not like me at all, another example are phrases like "Nobody cares of the box" I think that they are not necessarythat as I always reach a point in which insults the intelligence of the Viewer.To more than one they look like á a peliculón, I'm going to make a good movie that recommend seeing. As anecdote during the first minutes of the film can count on the presence of Piper warmer (Violet in Coyote Ugly) that after clunkers as George and the Dragon will start to emerge in upcoming projects for 2007 and 2008.
2,603
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1133
Francisco Bellón
La Caja Kovak
4
5
muchocine
The Kovak box is a film of remarkable intrigue, that fulfills its function perfectly, keep intigrado to the public until the last moment.
The thriller, intrigue and mystery films have not been historically very cultivated in the film Spanish, while in recent years is trying to remedy that. And most of these works have nothing to envy to major foreign productions, since they are very on top in terms of intelligence and originality. Spanish film is gradually losing their complexes with other film, and has demonstrated the capacity to address all kinds of genres and succeed in the challenge. Now, are the spectators who must forget prejudices against different Spanish films, and with examples such as La Caja Kovak, the company should not be very complicated.Daniel Monzón directed his third feature film, after a fairy tale, the heart of the Warrior and a wacky comedy, El Robo Más Grande never cash. Filmmaker proposes a thriller with La Caja Kovak psicólogico which does not take the Viewer by silly, which, although at first glance it seems an obvious achievement is commendable today. The opening credits sequence is a good sample of what you can expect from the film. David Norton (Timothy Hutton), a renowned science fiction writer travels to Mallorca to give a lecture, but in the course of your stay, will suffer a terrible loss. With the help of Silvia (Lucía Jiménez), a young and energetic girl, David will try to discover the strange events taking place in the island, and which person in charge seems to be an old man called Kovak (David Kelly). Daniel Monzón immerses the viewer in a disturbing and labyrinthine story, and not loose until that appear uncredited. The Kovak box is a film of intrigue and mystery made with the same spirit of the great classics of the genre, and is honest with himself, and that it offers what it promises, without any trap. Little by little, the tape will increasing intensity, and at the same time, the atmosphere that creates monsoon becomes more harrowing, catching the viewer completely, leaving him breathless and at the total mercy of the vagaries of the plot. In no time monsoon uses easy, free truculence, scares or the guts. Special mention merecn the last thirty minutes of La Caja Kovak and his intense climax. Technically, the film is outstanding, as well as the interpretative work of Timothy Hutton, Lucía Jiménez and David Kelly, which embroider their roles under the careful direction of the Majorcan.The Kovak box is a film of remarkable intrigue, that fulfills its function perfectly, keep intigrado to the public until the last moment, and it's an excellent example of good artistic health affecting the Spanish film.
2,604
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4171
Silvia Giner
La criatura perfecta
2
5
muchocine
The perfect creature is one of the bad movies you are going to watch this year. I believe that not even worth seeing or for those that are very very loving of the vampire theme or Gótika. It is slow and lacks any emotion.
Was when I saw for the first time the trailer for this movie, I touched a lot "another film on top with vampires and vampire baby". Clear que.en the film almost gives me the soponcio.The perfect creature is one of the bad movies you are going to watch this year. I believe that not even worth seeing or for those that are very very loving of the vampire theme or Gótika. It is slow and lacks any emotion. Narrates as live human and pseudo-vampiros in a retro-futuro in which these vampires are known as "Los Hermanos" and play a role similar to the Catholic priests in the society, that left the evident similarity for reflection. This co-production New Zealand - United Kingdom me has pulled out of my boxes for many reasons, as they are so many, I'll comment on the most relevant.Firstly, the decorated suck enough, it must be said that sometimes that is the cardboard stone, I have heard in my life almost a soundtrack so insignificant as this, not accompanied at all to history is descompasada and also for most I imagine that it goes unnoticed.Futuristic touch they have given to the film bristled me heart, God so ugly thing, that idea as vomit, God causes a sensation of constant repudiation towards what you are seeing. Also not be sustained because a minimally advanced society would never have whores streets unpaved, there are sequences in which is the ground of land and do straw?, we are going to run the horror. Not to say that they have black and white televisions, microphones that seem taken from DUNE coexisting with vans and airships, anyway.And as you would expect, I have here a good section of DESPELLEJE: Dougray Scott (the villain in mission impossible II) that we already entertained in Hitman and us alucinará in their next TV Movie Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde stars in "The perfect creature" and concludes in which will surely be the worst interpretation of his life. But let's see Dougry, do all the time why do is gesture by moving the head to the side as if you were a beast? Jo-der once is OK but all the time? I parce a pathetic way to build a character so rich as "Silus" and especially "Vampire" which has an infinite amount of possible registrations and siembargo the end result created by Dougray is impoverished.Well to finish with the I marujeo "could not leave me behind" to Saffron Burrows (the mystery Galíndez) aka "The fashion anorexic" because you know it because I've said it many times, I am up to the noses of the fucking look chupachúps and I think follow reivicando curves (Monica Belucci power!) this actress is that really give you some ganitas give a hot soupOh by God, is and perfect complement to spoil what could have been a great movie. It is also extremely bland and picks up the gun as a spaghetti, fatal, interpretativamente zero PATATERO.
2,605
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2571
Tito Chinchan
Pathfinder, el guía del desfiladero
3
5
muchocine
Remake of a Norwegian movie of the eighties, which tells the story of a young Viking expelled for his people. Lot of action type Conan, in a dark I do not understand, and with a predictable storyline. Popcorn.
Strange thought me of this film which has reached Spain by the puertsa back after a tremendous fiasco in its American premiere. Apparently it is going to be very far get retrieve the millionaire cost. And the truth that I do not understand as it cost a lot of money. On the other hand, the promotion that has had here is quite sad that not goes far beyond a couple of posters at bus stops.The film is about a young Viking lad landed on the shores of North America. Given that it is considered to be of the tribe of the Dragons (bad balls, ole rhyme), Aboriginal people that you are taken you with suspicion among them. When it grows, their distant relatives landed again in the area to crush as many skulls as possible (another objective not grasping). And he that sucked the sword of the breasts of his mother, has to defend his people.Well, the movie itself is not bad. It has spectacular moments of fighting, has a little soporíferos ratillos, and maintains a more or less continuous pace. In general, as it atisbaba in the trailer, it is a very dark tape, and this becomes a tremendous problem in the action scenes, which can not see anything. The behaviour of the actors, at times becomes a bit strange, touching the absurdism (as in the scene of the trap). The costume is tad excessive, with a horned Vikings with more skins to peleterías Martínez, from the Aboriginal despelotados semi.To sum up, remake of a Norwegian movie of the eighties, which tells the story of a young Viking expelled by his people, who later has to defend his adoptive parents of their real families. Lot of action type Conan, in a dark I do not understand, and with a predictable storyline. Popcorn.Besitos.diferencias with the originalPara start, they have said that it is a remake that has given them the win, given that history is simply similar. In the original, all the action takes place in Lapland and the kid is the Earth. In the remake, we have an exiled Viking fighting his native people in North America. Then the plot starts to go hand in hand, as it should be. The action, of course has nothing to do, given the first more interest to the plot than in the second, more focused on crushing skulls.As for credibility, of course that the first is much more. The history can believe perfectly, while in the latter there is who creates many of the parts of the story. The blood does not know moving the sword, not. Finally, do not understand as in the present they have ignored the essential scene of unnecessary naked in the sauna of Norway. An incomprehensible error from every point of view.Hey, and where is the first snow? And crossbows? And sensual female breasts? (This had already said, but if you do a remake do not forget the pechis)Page web webLa is pretty little curved. It has the least to justify the expense of a domain. A few photos spectacular (but small), your video clips and little else. The only thing remarkable is the Viking chronology, anecdotal way.
2,606
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/198
Juan David
Matador
4
5
muchocine
Matador has been one of the surprises of the film season
The Matador was one of the surprises of the film last season to take a repeated theme and tell it from a new perspective with enough black humor, accept it is the best type of humor that exists.One of the biggest surprises is to see Pierce Brosnan playing the same type of roles has been doing some time ago but from a totally new perspective and is one of the best performances of his career. In the film Brosnan plays a Hitman that lies in the middle of an emotional crisis, accustomed to being alone and not having a home to Julian Noble, the weight of years falls suddenly on Julian doing this depression affected his work.In Mexico Julian meets Danny a type whose fate has gone from bad to worse after the death of his young son and she is in Mexico trying to urgently define a business to give stability lost his marriage; both engage in a small friendship and even Julian confesses to Danny his profession.Time later when Julian is definitely unable to do their work their heads try to settle it by which resorts to Danny, the only friend who never has tenidopara help make a last work to save his life...The grace of the film is the relationship of the characters and some dialogues of which are quite memorable, Brosnan does an excellent job shedding the image of James Bond, heretic tell me but for me it is the best James Bond that has ever existed you comparé to Connery with toasted such Julio Iglesias who shouted "skin cancer". Finally the film is entertaining and fast even though it is not the type of humor of Scary Movie but is more oriented to the dialogues.
2,607
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2982
Tito Chinchan
Calígula
5
5
muchocine
Film pornographic semi on the life of the Roman emperor Caligula, who devoted all its efforts to Vice setting aside politics and the sanity of step. To refine the zambomba without more.
Rivers of life juice have been spilled over the thousands of screenings of this film, rivers that reach the sea of life from which was born the Mediterranean. If when you cut the Woodpecker that God of Mythology was something like this, why not can be this true? Separate grumosidades, in the memory of my adolescent mind, the pool full of "fishes" that make my most fevered imagination. To the mess.The film is about Caligula, Roman Emperor seeing what rocks be, killed his predecessor as well as not wanting to. Once on the throne, he focuses on Vice and perversion, gaining thousands of enemies and the people who love him. To blow Dick elapses the film, that has nothing, but as they go in every scene people in balls, then becomes very animadita.Penthouse was which put the pasta to make this semi pornographic film, that without having neither feet nor head wins the favor of the criticism (at least of the mia). Vice and perversion of the Lord, than anything more start gives a meneito his sister to dip bread and churro, let us dream with other periods where the orgies were the daily bread. My mother, Roman Emperor, all-day dale you hit. See Julio Cesar, who killed him until his son and without being all day pushing as a lion. Much more ready this Calígula. By the way, that crazy face has this boy.In short, film pornographic semi on the life of the Roman emperor Caligula, who devoted all his efforts to Vice setting aside politics and the sanity of step. To refine the zambomba without more.Caligula, with your purse brown skin and its cojón skin shoes. (Was the first version of Serrat)kisses.
2,608
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/847
Alberto Concepción
Casino Royale
3
5
muchocine
The saga of 007 returns, and makes it big, with numerous and notable changes, that may or may not be liked by everyone, but which in my view were necessary and are efficient.
They are many months already which leads talking of the new movie of the most famous British agent of the last century, the character of Ian Fleming, James Bond. There were many doubts about the suitability of Daniel Craig for the characterization of the spy, who could in part be justified 'a priori' (blond, too muscular), but which also served to give free advertising, but grateful.As well, doubts may already be dissipated. You can like, not like, much like or not like anything. And to me? To my I liked. More than others in the series: has a more interesting, less liosa plot what is customary, explains quite a lot of the character of Bond and is, as always, action, with several successful scenes (Chase across the rooftops). To give, or at least try, a blow, hired the head of one of the best films, as it was 'GoldenEye'. And to top it off, they wanted that Paul Haggis (writer of the sobrevaloradísima 'Million Dollar Baby') and Director of the great 'Crash' was in charge of the argument. And seen, the result is good. At least, better than expected. We have one of the Bonds more cold, hard, personal and serious of those seen so far: a change, no doubt. At best, at worst? At least to worst no, but we should wait for the next film to be able to have more founded opinions.That Yes, the movie is not perfect: the romance between the characters of Daniel Craig and Eva Green, is full of pretentiously intelligent dialogues, but lacking of. chemical. Sense. With 'statements' arriving to be shocking and artificial. In addition, it is possible that something be done 'long' in the last 20 minutes seems it can end without leaving a bitter taste in the mouth. But ignoring that, the product has a remarkable rating: perhaps something irregular, but focus the plot on poker, while reflected us through the 'secondary' details the rest of the story, does not come out badly. You can leave you something cold, but so are already appreciated some touches of humor, that more than one laugh (counted, but sound) will be releasing.Evaluating already separately every aspect, it is impossible not to judge what we all had already in mind to see the movie: the work of Craig. As I said before, not only meets, but gives a personal touch, endorsing the character, and making believe you that's Bond. And it was difiícil, but it does. I liked it, and I am glad that he has been. And Eva Green? Correct, but not comparable to the rest of 'Bond girls'. To my still leaving me cold, and having to assume the role that was given, I doubt that it is good. The rest of side seconded the work of actors, without either having no notable action.Thus, 007 saga returns, and makes it big, with numerous and notable changes, which may or not be liked by everyone, but which in my view were necessary and are efficient. And Craig? Then another one, please.
2,609
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3148
Andrés Pons
Death Sentence
2
5
muchocine
The first minutes in the presentation of characters all very nice. Wonderful woman, very clever children, a perfect home, work of luxury that it looks like a cross between little house on the Prairie and feeling of living then become I am justice.
The creator of SAW again sank despite substantially improve the results of the very mediocre SILENCE DEATH. Apparently at last became convinced of the need to hire actors truth. The great KEVIN BACON "The lumberjack, MISTIC RIVER", KELLY PRESTON "SKY HIGH" or always solvent JOHN GOODMAN "Still as God" among others, get a greater packaging to the proposal. You can not say that about a script that we see in his female version in the failed the odd which is in me. What shows that justicieros or Avengers films never go out of fashion.The action scenes are resolved in a dignified manner without great flourishes, music and photography are really impressive giving a flawless technical aspect. Only a small point fails, the script so amazing that anyone with two fingers of forehead you can believe what you are telling.That an Executive faced with shots and call with some gangsters out winner at all times because I think it is science fiction. We see in the movies of CHARLES BRONSON for putting an example is a type of street, a hard police used to carry weapons.That gives certain verisimilitud to situations, which is a bit strange is that a clerk of the lot is suddenly an expert on weapons, fight melee that leave them in diapers to the fucking RAMBO.Type rapa to zero, change the suit and tie by chupa leather and more scary than TERMINATOR.Only missing a couple of PIERCINGS accompanied by leather boots, that if the first minutes in the presentation of characters all very nice.Wonderful woman, very clever children, a perfect home, work of luxury that it looks like a cross between little house on the Prairie and feeling of living then become I am justice.Despite this incredible fair argument, it is at least entertaining and save us the typical surprises tucked with shoehorn of the director.
2,610
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4253
Iñaki Bilbao
Fucking amal
3
5
muchocine
Interesting film co-produced by Sweden and Denmark, made of rough and rather rudimentary form in the technical aspect (filmed in 16 mm), but honest and credible to 100 percent.
In a sad Sweden people live two girls who study in an Institute. Elin is a beautiful, rebellious, young that comes with many boys, although he dislikes none. It's not be like any other, and has dreams and hopes for a better future, will undoubtedly bring you the people.For its part, Agnes lives with her parents and is in love with Elin secret. She has no friends since he lives in this town, where he arrived two years ago.To establish contacts with other colleagues, his mother organizes a party at home, where it is not nobody except for Elin and her sister, ranging more drinking than otherwise.Despite the difference of characters of the two girls, Elin and Agnes fall in love, but Elin does not dare to "come out" by fear to the rejection of the friend ACE.Interesting film co-produced by Sweden and Denmark, made of rough and rather rudimentary form in the technical aspect (filmed in 16 mm), but honest and credible to 100 percent.This succeeds Moodysson, director, thanks to a good script, with successful dialogues (the mother of the girl lesbian explaining to his young son what lesbianism) and great performances.The decor is simple but full of intense moments that mixed humor with sadness and despair, while that doubts and feelings of his unhappy characters.His existential void, product of the boredom of the cold and lonely place, full of despair, makes them start and end more sometimes even sexual relations by ending the boredom than by the possible love may feel towards their partners.The end, removing the excess epilogue, is good and want to applaud, partly because of the simplicity of its proposal and in part by the rightness of his speech, a speech at all times close to the Viewer, who feels that we you are talking about you to you and recognizes characters, far removed physically which are in them.Estimable in truth, won a lot of international awards, especially for part
2,611
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2954
Rafa Delgado
Ratatouille
4
5
muchocine
It has one of the most original and fresh arguments that Pixar has had in recent years. How far was this sosez named Cars!
Pixar has done again it. 'Ratatouille' is one of the most original and fresh arguments that Pixar has had in recent years (although 'The Incredibles' I like superior, at least in what regards to entertainment), and offered the film in a long time.The script is wonderful and perfect execution. The character design is the very best of Pixar (a parrot with the critic, and the own protagonist, called Rémy rat), and technically is the best movie of the story computer animation (something that will be overcome soon, seen the pace that leads the technology).Only a small paste: the subplot with relatives and colleagues of Rémy, which seemed quite tired and I pulled in a bad way of rewarding rhythm which bore the tape until they make Act of presence the above. Fortunately that is something fleeting.Since then, how far has been this sosez called 'Cars'!
2,612
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2507
JLO
Kun-fu-sion
5
5
muchocine
A work of absurd humor, which so hip with the Spanish Javier Fesser, creator of the excellent El milagro de p. Tinto (1998) and Mortadelo y Filemón (2002). I.e., a Chinese and a Spanish as highest regard of this genre.
Stephen Chow is today after seven films, the man no. 1 film in China. The popularity did it Star, but also in their films is the director, producer, screenwriter and the total brain behind your product. As did also the old glories such as Charles Chaplin and Buster Keaton. And to them is precisely - among others - to who pays tribute to Chow with his fresh comedies and dancers.Slapstick, this physical form of humor he returned with him. A primitive and anarchic, ideal mood for the pirouettes of kung fu; a territory that Buster Keaton did great, creative chaos in chain as this beautiful Kung fusion. Ojo also Chow shows a care of the aesthetics and forms (see the picture of this image), in the Assembly, makes us to agree on both the frames of apparently, another of their direct influences: Stanley Kubrick. If not see the opening scene and the endless travelling backwards. In previous Shaolin Soccer, is the beginning with the soccer ball and a head of shaolin "aligned" as the famous planets, to the sound of classical music, which shows. Here is an obvious reference to the shining. Pure cinephiles. And respect for the classics. All this is really no surprise. Shaolin soccer (2001) was a zany comedy and showing all the imagination that Kung fusion confirms. The surprise is really that Chow is exceeded, which in this case makes his last film in almost a masterpiece.A work of absurd humor, which so hip with the Spanish Javier Fesser, creator of the excellent El milagro de p. Tinto (1998) and Mortadelo y Filemón (2002). I.e., a Chinese and a Spanish as highest regard of this genre. Ja.El more accurate example of what can be Chow movies, I gave the Critic Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun Times: "Imagine a film where Jackie Chan and Buster Keaton meet Quentin Tarantino and Bugs Bunny". In fact, the choreographed fight scenes, were made by the same team that failed Eastern parody called Kill Bill (and also of Matrix). Both poor imitations of the oriental culture. Step and unwittingly, left to the now Hollywood Jackie Chan, a little ancient and on the verge of retirement. And here it shows the difference, because any of several Kung fighting. they pass without disheveled, to the big and numerous of Kill Bill. Only one could compare them in skill and imagination, with some of the animated series Dragon Ball!.Telling gags – which are hundreds – not only would be boring if not impossible. The script, with endearing characters and without falling into the dreaded kitsch, is a little simpler. The struggle of common people against the mafia, no underline. Smart and pure fun. Up the own Chow is kept in the background in the film despite being the protagonist. The scene of persecution - worthy of any chapter of the Road Runner - the fight with the musicians and the final battle; they are the high points of a film with a steady pace, redondísima, with excellent performances of mostly older people - some are operation Dragon Bruce Lee!-, with romance, action, humor and without weak points. Anything else?.Buster Keaton from somewhere in the sky, after seeing Kung Fusion, will be smiling for the first time.
2,613
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/140
Red Stovall
Plan oculto
3
5
muchocine
The expertise of Lee in the staging and the millimeter screenplay by Russell Gewirtz make us forget the little originality in its history
Many times they have compared to Spike Lee with Woody Allen. Well, I think that certain films Lee can be compared with the Allen, because actually there is something the film of the director New York film Lee. But I think that this last has been able to continue their own way without the influence of Allen, especially in his last films, where we are with the wonderful 'La last night'. In addition, anda that not leave you imitators to Woody Allen, like to focus only on read. 'Inside Man', which has been gruesomely translated in our country as 'Hidden Plan' it starts with the robbery to a Bank, which quickly becomes a situation with hostages. In the workplace make Act of presence order forces, with detective Frazier to head. However, the case does not seem the typical case of kidnapping or robbery, as evidenced by the appearance place of Madeline White, someone watching over the interests of a third character that has a lot to hide.Since then the argument is nothing out of this world, and not intended. The expertise of Lee in the start-up scene and the millimeter screenplay by Russell Gewirtz make us forget the little originality in its history, and give us a thriller as few do today. Full of emotion, good characters and above all who are attentive to the screen, without us we deslumbremos with explosions, shots and persecution. Quite an achievement, the truth.One of the things that draws most attention is its extensive gallery of characters, all very different among themselves, and with different interests. Lee shows great intelligence and a shuffle in Jodie Foster a character that can handle all the roost, so the forces of order are challenged to have someone unknown above them. By the way, Foster comes incredibly beautiful all trajeada. Leaves little but it is noted, though his character is a bit bland.Denzel Washington plays a detective in his first major case, and the actor is almost as always: protesting and seeking the truth. We get what is expected of him, and even in certain scenes are going ahead of him, to the anticipate their reactions, although I do not say this as a defect, but rather the opposite.For me who takes the cake is Clive Owen, with a more interesting character, and which never came to know much. This is one of the successes, his enigmatic personality remains enigmatic at the conclusion of the film, and we were eager to know more. Owen is an actor who does not seem as good as many people say, but here it is it gets. The home, with him talking to the Viewer, is simply spectacular.On the side we find the great Christopher Plummer, lately not to work, demonstrating that it arrives with his mere presence. Also get Willen Dafoe, although its presence in the cast seems simply a box office claim that his character does not stand out. Or who knows, maybe Lee intended precisely that, which a character nothing remarkable it interpreted someone well known, which would be a point in favor of the film.Where the film is a true joy is in the staging of Lee, completely sober and elegant, although sometime is going hand in hand with some slightly dramatic sequence, especially one in a moment of maximum climax, in which Washington is moving at full speed in the foreground. The sequence has Coif, is well done, but no longer a whim of its director, and that really adds nothing to the film. On the other hand, within the Bank, Lee passes as a dwarf doing a lot of planes sequence that are a true joy. Lee gives a rhythm to the truly enviable film. We take into account that the film lasts two hours and that is much footage, which never becomes boring due to the excellent Assembly (already could learn others).Finally highlight the soundtrack of the always interesting Terence Blanchard, and the song called Chaiyya Chaiyya Bollywood Joint, performed by Sapna Awasthi and Sukhwinder Singh, which opens and closes the film. A film of course is the very best that are now on the Bulletin Board, next to these two wonders 'V for Vendetta' and '16 streets'. Magnificent.
2,614
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/714
Hartigan
Yo soy la juani
3
5
muchocine
This is probably one of the least personal films of Bigas Luna, more commercial, and why declarademente because it is, so far, which I liked most of this author.
After a good season retired from the world of 100, Bigas Luna returns with Yo soy Juani, what we might call a "generational portrait" of suburban kids (and if I entrecomillo it is because things are very relative). Juani is a bold, decisive and talkative girl who lives in a neighborhood in the suburbs of Spain somewhere together, her panda and her boyfriend Jonah. Curra Juani from cashier while waiting the opportunity of becoming an actress, while the possessive Jonah does not want to let her go to Madrid to make a casting. Between, they entertain with tuning and the route of the cod (or what Bigas Luna seems to understand why). The sudden break with Jonah carried Juani to revolt and try to get if I sleep in the capital, where you will discover that not everything is as easy as expected.If something surprises of this film is that it has two clearly differentiated parts that look like two completely different universes. The first is which is based on young people in the suburb and its "culture": tunnig, racing, bakalao, hip-hop, graffiti, tattoos, sequins? A so exploited batiburillo today which seems provide anything new. It seems as if the producers would have seen The Fast and The Furious and had said: "why not make a Rodeo version they like young people?". Without further encouragement to me classist, there is only a class of young people who can feel identified with showing the film. They are often recognized in the film: they come late and by torbe's couples, sit in the background and engaged throughout the film and make stupid comments aloud and addressed with who tries to make them shut up. If Bigas Luna aims to fill the rooms of these boys, who adhere to lose the rest of spectators. Still, does not assure that our Jonathans and Jessicas are entirely satisfied, because the action is not much (there is a surreal race of brides with their boyfriends handcuffed to the hood of the car, but the actual images are replaced by a video game) and the music does not stand out (hip hop is decent but Moon strives to resurrect the cod of Chimo Bayo everytime you can)(, his authentic fetish from ham, ham). That Yes, there is sex and "beautiful" people (do though how bad you feel the close-up Dani Martín?)The second part of the film, in which the Juani and her friend the Vane reach Madrid, completely changes of tone. After giving a consumer binge pretty woman style, Juani is put hands to work to try to fulfill his dream. And here comes the surprise: the film isn't badass fairy tale which seemed from the outset. After the rush of adrenaline reaches realism: the Juani has it difficult. Discover the tail of unemployment, garbage work, asked English, meet pretentious managers, chuleador Publisher, the whoremonger footballer. And it is at this time that reveals the true Juani, already stripped of all his bravucona and vulgar aggressiveness: in his determination to get until the end but also in their principles and their dignity in that it is not prepared to anything and that, unlike the Vane that he only wanted to please you boobs and take advantageIt is better that the world around him, is someone that you may feel tenderness and sympathy.Veronica Échegui is a discovery. It has a special beauty that reminds, opportunistically, Natalie Portman. Like several other characters in the film, however, suffers from syndrome out of class: and it seems that the writers have gotten with a tape recorder in a nightclub and then it have remixed everything so you try to sound juvenile and desparpajo. So when you drop pearls as: "you do not I eat the head, you to my me eat pussy", sounds like the impostado that you can imagine. It is only in the second part, stripped of the artificiality that demanded the first Juani, which is really touching. Dani Martín plays surprisingly well as the cocoon of Jonah, a real big kid bobalicón. It is true that his physique not accompanies (your supplicant air gives you the look of a beaten dog) but well could become an icon of the youth of neighborhood, as Juan José Ballesta, if it is that we need more of truth. The rest of the actors stand out or have an opportunity to do so.This is probably one of the least personal films of Bigas Luna, more commercial, and why declarademente because it is, so far, which I liked most of this author. However, let me say in conclusion that the telepromoción that makes this film is truly shameful. Not only of the film itself (the Juani dreams in their epileptic delusions movie website.) (Literal) but to all kinds of brands and even a Madrid department store which are practically part of the film. Attention to the pot of Cologne using the Jonah: it is the case of "product placement" plus scandalous has ever seen in cinema, not because it is blatant but by the place in which the "product", in an erotic outburst, is "placed". The Juani not it makes him laugh. Who writes, either.
2,615
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3808
Andrés Pons
American Gangster
3
5
muchocine
A film that could be a masterpiece but lacks a couple of revolutions, a nerve in the realization that fails, emotion is conspicuous by its absence.
The friendship between two major HOLLYWOOD the great actor RUSSELL CROWE and director RIDLEY SCOTT irregular. He gave the spectacular than not great movie GLADIATOR and that nonsense called a good year.After that I guess that both had thought well a next collaboration. To not fail made sure to surround himself of other great actors, the always brilliant DENZEL WASHINGTON which has already demonstrated its great worth playing the villain with his escarizado role in day of training, the ascendant JOSH BROLIN that this year we saw in PLANET TERROR, or also by JERRY MAGUIRE CUBA GOODING JR oscar winner.A well-constructed script that recounts in a meticulous manner the gangsters operations to pass the goods on the one hand and on the other hand the police investigation a honest police bearing their motto up situations that border the surreal. The production of the film note of luxury in your invoice, the locker room, photography, music, everything helps beautifully recreate the era of the 70.Con all those means, a good director after the cameras, some of the best performers of the time giving the gift of chest, one of those epic stories of Ascension to power that both like in HOLLYWOODthe result should be touching the outstanding. Because neither approaches, by the topic has many points in common with the Godfather saga, there was the Sicilian mafia and here the greatest gangster color. Gentlemen; RIDLEY SCOTT is not COPPOLA nor did get to the soles of the shoes as much at the beginning of his career signed two of the greatest masterpieces of science fiction in Alien and Blade Runner. Because his later filmography has disasters of the caliber of the Grifters, a good year GI JANE. By all these titles showed that this man is a great distance from the best teachers.Obviously a pardillo is not and know when it wants to offer a great wrapper but occasionally when unfolds the wrapper there is inside it is not for both.A film that could be a masterpiece but lacks a couple of revolutions, a nerve in the realization that fails, emotion is conspicuous by its absence. In a few words it takes more courage to tell something so hard and it impact of truth, since no scene of this correct film comes to knock out the viewer being his greater sin the boredom that takes over in the room as it progresses the footage.Ultimately a film deslumbrantemente submitted that it lacks the necessary to become great epic and that is not bought with money.
2,616
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2301
Cp
Oceans 13
2
5
muchocine
To leave the room, after seeing this film, the feeling was very clear, that disappointment. The third part of this series of films, which everyone defines as a gathering of friends.
To leave the room, after seeing this film, the feeling was very clear, that disappointment. The third part of this series of films, which globally defined as a meeting of friends that also gives the chance that is filmed, is equal to the above in the form, but not the bottom.I mean, like the other two installments, the story is very simple, argument barely exists, and turn theft is becoming more exaggerated. Agree, all that we have assumed, and it is not a surprise. But both the first film, as especially the second, had a few scenes of dialogue simply unforgettable. Fun, spontaneous and that made you laugh, you repetías some phrases and scenes to anyone who you asked about the movie, thanks mostly to the chemistry between Clooney and Pitt, to which was added some time Damon in his role as the pardillo against two veterans. Because all that does not exist in this third part. It is as if they had forgotten to screenwriter hire. There is no funny phrases, there are no scenes for remember, the characters go through with little time to say anything, and above all, the feeling that are without wanting to, without the impetus and excitement of the second part. Do we have then? Because hardly anything. There is no story, there is no pace, there is a fun plan to steal, that does not make sense only and the side is as if were not. In the end, you can laugh a little, but disappoints those who liked them the previous, and the rest will surely not they liked either, by still maintaining the style of trying to make a comedy. But a comedy jokes and good dialogues this clear will not be a great success.
2,617
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2149
Patri
Hierro 3
4
5
muchocine
Iron 3 is a movie which transmits many emotions with a minimalist style, full of small details.
Exquisite film full of silence about a lonely boy who enters empty houses and found them during a day, this actor does not say a single word throughout the film, but does not need because it conveys much more with their actions and their looks. Strolling through the houses, kitchen, he watches television, also washes the clothing found in the House and her tends, fix dilapidated equipment that is and soon disappears from the same House that came without making noise. And find another empty House.In one of the houses in which there is a silent woman watching him for hours without him is account, is a woman abused by her husband wants to escape his life and finds the protagonist this escape route, the two do not cross a single word, but are understood and they go togetherthey share a time living from House in house and feel free, it is a relationship full of subtle and poetic moments, they are two lonely souls who care for each other, silently through the houses as if they were ghosts.The title of the film is the name given to the golf club less used by golfers and is the type of stick that uses the protagonist and which will be very important in history.Iron 3 is a movie which transmits many emotions with a minimalist style, full of small details.
2,618
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/859
Pablo López
El laberinto del fauno
3
5
muchocine
A film which could perhaps lead to confusion, because the sell something that is not exactly, but for me, of course, a confusion that gave me a major surprise.
On Thursday I had the pleasure of going to the cinema after a long time, and it left me very good flavor of mouth El Laberinto del Fauno, by Guillermo del Toro. A film which could perhaps lead to confusion, because the sell something that is not exactly, but for me, of course, a confusion that gave me a major surprise.Ophelia is a girl fond of fairy tales which has live times of the Spanish civil war. With her mother, Carmen, was directed to a mill located in the mountain where Captain Vidal has mounted the front of operations against the last Republican resistance. Upon arrival there discovers an ancient labyrinth located a few meters from the residence.With this first premise, del Toro composed a story tinged (few) fantastic on the imagination, survival and the horror of the war (in this case postwar). A text which although it lacks some details that consider you best, puts our film in a very good position, and that if, with a quality more than acceptable (not as Alatriste), lack of view Los Borgia (which do not draw me nothing, inter alia by the cast, history is very suggestive).The actors are all pretty well (even Maribel Verdú), highlighting of course to a huge Sergi López, which while we already knew that he was a great actor, here continues to demonstrate it, piece of character which builds and piece of interpretation. Chord music, without too much flourish, a very 'à of del Toro' address and a photograph and address of art to remove his hat, because really, the film would not be nothing out of this world without the gloomy touch that fills with images and the Curran direction of art that you immersed in a fantasy world (even when this is not the world of fantasy)of course, aesthetically a very notable work.One aspect that I found very commented in the reviews of the people (specifically in FilmAffinity) is the ideological position of the movie. It honestly seems a trivial subject, simplify this film in a history of good and bad seems somewhat too helpings to use as an argument. It is true that somewhere, but honestly, you must position to tell a story not be if by affinity, by carelessness or because it seems a topic so last lap, that I not stopped to think that detail until I came home and saw to the same jaleosos of always getting darnel. A penalty.But well, back to the issue before us. You have to go to see her! And it is already.
2,619
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1360
Rafa Martín
Apocalypto
4
5
muchocine
Gibson performed a kind of cinema that serves much more instinct than intelligence. It is not an extraordinary film, but yes it is a great, great experience.
My favorite movie of 2006 together with children of men, that does not mean to be so "good film" as infiltrators or The Queen, for instance. Contradictory? Yes but Apocalypto, as well as the genius of Cuarón, not adheres to the usual film standards. Don't use this word very often because I am suspicious of the meaning, but "visceral" is an adjective that this wonder comes as ring to the finger: an exhibition of strength of 125 minutes where the image takes over and makes the decline of civilization maya in the best adventure film of the past twenty years, at the height of Master & Commander (saving the differences) and sister of the equally fascinating La Selva Esmeralda.No blood both a sociological study as a truly brutal hosts, Apocalypto Odyssey presents a fundamental idea: keep things simple. Gibson has been called fascist, reactionary, religious fanatic, but is also a traditionalist in the best sense of the word: one who despises authority and civilization when they are missing their main objective, and not only hamper the development of the man that he annihilated. So Jaguar claw, his family and his tribe living in peace and harmony, until some idiots theoretically more developed kidnap them and offer them as sacrifices human to control the population. What fucking, do ein?. As for Gibson rules change by the time Jaguar claw escapes and poured over the heads of the wretched pursuing more donkey revenge seen in years on a cinema screen. Reader friend: Gibson is Charles Dickens nor Camilo José Cela, to see wonderful you surgery and lengthy dissertations of society, for that is Babel, surely that project in the room of to the side what do do when pursued you a troop of Maya? Run, obvious.Like his previous film, the passion of the Christ, Apocalypto is shot entirely in their original language, in this case mauya with subtitles. It is one of the small luxuries that its director and producer can afford and could frankly, have been folded perfectly (although we would lose the effort of its protagonists to speak that language, which has not on the other hand to the ear, unlike the Aramaic). However, is part of the way Martin Riggs into the world in which these people live, where peace, harmony and the messing of the tribe of Jaguar claw (which highlights the scenes where tease her partner Mellado, unable to have children, so it is forced to eat tapir balls)(, sounds like) contrast with the environment full of the great maya city, from whose main pyramid a priest bastard is dedicated to get the heart to la peña and slice them the head in front of a Queen who seems a clone of Paris Hilton and a small Prince, fat as a seal and with a face of child bastard that makes you want to pull down stairs.Essentially, Gibson relies on the power of visual of one of the best sunsets in scene of the year. No frills many, out of the use of the slow, but there are many turnkey digital camera that puts us directly on the skin of the characters. Is a film that leaves no also spend much time since it begins until it ends: the Odyssey of Jaguar claw hardly lasts a day, and there is no many ellipsis of time, which causes sensation of exhaustion and claustrophobia (there are scenes that last nearly quarter of hour, twenty minutes), but this man knows to shoot: the picture is excellent and the soundtrack, although it is everywhere, accompanies the action without being annoying. Wealth is in limelight, gestures and looks (great Rudy Youngblood) and the use of the colors (slaves painted white, which are going to be slaughtered, covered in blue; and Jaguar claw covered in black mud, in the last moments of the film).But again, this is an action movie, where the good guys are very good and the bad are some real bastards, in particular eye in the Centre and zero Wolf (do you ever seen so acojonante name?). Everything is black and white for Gibson, what's complicated life. That is why what the film attacks directly to the thirst for blood of the Viewer. Warning: this movie is violent. Not artistically violent as what Tarantino. Non-subnormalmente violent as what makes Eli Roth. I mean brutally violent. Shattered skulls, devoradas sides by wild animals, human graves, empalamientos, arrows in the coco, stabbed and the hosts fist of life, without much recreate, but cut a hair that I mean. And as far as action is concerned, I assure you, Apocalypto barely known rival: is frantic, fast, and some scenes are simply acojonantes everything that relates to their last 40 minutes, in which a game of seven warriors tries to give especially hunting Jaguar claw, that attempts to return to what's left of his people to save his wife and his son.Damien King, in a video clip of his new reggaeton theme "your breasts are hot, hot".This movie is a real experience for the senses. Regardless of what Gibson in real life (where are you treated as a moscón that disrupts the quiet life of the politically correct), this guy has found his own voice, in a moment of his career that has reached a point in which can do what pleases real. Instead of playing football in the big leagues, this guy is dedicated to make the kind of films that he wants to see, what makes it a true outsider in the industry, capable of connecting with the public because not complicated life the least and performs a kind of cinema that serves much more instinct than intelligence. It is not an extraordinary film, but yes it is a great, great experience.
2,620
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3993
José Córdoba
La Huella
4
5
muchocine
The footprint is a remake of stimulating, very different to the original work, and yet, complementary, with a bold direction, a few performances to remember and a surprising reinterpretation of the original text.
The current rush of remakes has no end, usually focus on action and/or science fiction films, but also make you disgusted for comedies or dramas. I can understand the remakes when game material isn't much less a classic film, as for example the case of Thomas Crown, whose new version the Thomas Crown secret is even higher than the original. Not quite understand what redo authentic classics or masterpieces such as psychosis or the window indiscreet. Such operations always have seemed to me insured suicides because comparisons are always odious. And however they continue because they certainly tend to be very profitable. All this comes in the wake of the release of the remake of the footprint, the 1972 film, posthumous work of Joseph l. Mankiewicz from the work of Anthony Schaffer (Amadeus) adapted by the author himself and starring Michael Caine and Laurence Olivier. The new version has a sheet of enviable: the address is borne by Kenneth Branagh and adaptation has been written by the prize Nobel Harold Pinter while performers are Jude Law and Michael Caine.La plot begins when a young actor is invited to the House of a prestigious writer of mystery novels. Once meet begins a long dialogue in which replicas and contrarréplicas occur which more acute.The best that can be said of the Branagh film is that it is a reinterpretation of the original material, both aesthetic of content. In the Mankiewicz film everything revolves around the idea of game, the appearances of the great pantomime in a lighter tone, with very successful comic details. However, this new version has a much more serious tone and dark present both in its staging in the characters. The game still present, but the reinterpretation that makes text Pinter, perhaps gives more importance to other factors like for example a homosexual rapprochement between the characters.The direction of Branagh is also opposed to proposed by Mankiewicz. The second got something really difficult, namely, that a work with only two characters would be fully film and hold tension and interest for nearly two hours and twenty minutes. Kenneth Branagh has always stood by know adapt the theatrical environment in an excellent way to film, so surprise your choice. The English director, in a very risky decision, plays to do theatre within cinema, i.e. to make a film film but with elements of the theatrical language. The scene, one character is undoubtedly a minimalist house, with the minimum of elements to focus attention on the characters. In addition it has a continuous game of flat "strangers" and even allows the characters to play with the lighting environment, so every scene has its own light, chosen in "live" by the protagonists. It is a difficult decision, which does not work in all the scenes, but in general it is surprising and refreshing as well as being a very creative way to combine both codes (of the theatre and cinema) from the point of view of the address. As director of actors, Branagh is excellent as always.In the commentary for the orphanage commented that Belén Rueda was the movie, in this case is the same Michael Caine. Jude Law is also fine, but what has been achieved Caine is really extraordinary. A character complex, full of nuances, with impressive a poise and serenity and whose you silencias and eyes say more than many dialogues. Also get closer to its character radically different to the one done by Olivier in the original, and yet at the height of that prodigious interpretation. Photography and art direction are appropriate and discrete, surprising the design of the House in which the action and that ends up being one character. On the other hand, Patrick Doyle achieved his best score in many years, away from excesses as Eragon, achieves an extraordinary result based solely on a topic that receives different variations as the film progresses. A lot of work at the height of the best of the author.In summary, the footprint is a remake of stimulating, very different to the original work, and yet, complementary, with a bold direction, a few performances to remember and a surprising reinterpretation of the original text, which takes about an hour of duration, unless the result will suffer so notorious. But above all the footprint is the finding that Michael Caine, when stop Phooey as Miss special agent, is one of the greatest geniuses of the interpretation which we have at present. Only he should see the film, fortunately the rest of the elements are also worthwhile.PS: Must see the footprint of Mankiewicz, a masterpiece of the truth.PD2: Don't miss the funny cameo by Pinter and Branagh in the film (a track, attentive to the television screen)
2,621
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3172
Rafa Delgado
High School Musical 2
2
5
muchocine
A second part which would get would be losing all the little freshness that might have the first part, to be a lot more commercial... and so has been.
The other day premiered on the Disney Channel Spanish Youth smash hit High School Musical, musical movie sequel that I already mini defended in his day. My little sister saw her yesterday and recorded it on DVD, and today I could verla.¿Expectativas? None at all, so then I not come with those of "Pf! what you expect?". The first was majilla, and it is enough. The story also closed well. A second part which would get would be losing all the little freshness that might have the first part, to be a lot more commercial. In addition, seen the talent that have the Disney Channel to make series and TV movies, it was hoped that the story would be more of the same, and would not provide anything new whatsoever with respect to its predecessor. Only sell CDs and DVDs.And so it has been.High School Musical 2 is a quite considerable bullshit. The argument (which has the "Adventures" of the wildcats in summer) is a joke (when the movie finished, go to a mirror and you see the faces that you have been), and multiply the defects that, in what could be, had the first part: twice as predictable, topical twice, and twice as corny.The musical treatment of the story also makes waters with regard to the first part, and is so so so commercial that it recoils. Do only minimally save What time is it? and I don't dance (although the origin of the latter is also another bullshit), that are at least somewhat marchosas.The rest garbage. Only for fans of the these buds, disneychanneleros, and the more youngsters. Not recommended for over 17 years.At least that you call Andy Stitzer.
2,622
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1615
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Diamante de sangre
3
5
muchocine
Another product, this very worthy social denunciation film sifted by suits commercial doneness where not shines neither one nor the other to the desired height. Meritorious roster of actors and great narrative pulse for a tape that will not make history but which is welcome, if it is like a word suitable for the terrible story of blood and hypocrisy tells us.
The film always raises a trap: a brief space where the director makes us participate in a tale whose final destination is to distract us, but also consent to ensure us a bit of reflection. Even the most exemplary crappy garnished with some commendable speech. The problem, because what we have written many times, are not the issues. All are filmables. Any argument is worth being brought to the screen. The problem is the way, the purpose, writing. Blood diamonds entertains a lot: there are not almost stops in these two hours of rough portrait of white exploitation of the rich African land. Where the bellows loses fuste is emotion because there are moments in which one feels spectator of an Indiana Jones movie, even though we know that the matter is serious and there is a huge drama in which all are involved as the film shows perfectly under the pyrotechnic Fireworks weapons and persecutions. Edward Zwick portrays violence with ex officio. There are even scenes of astonishing cruelty to be a product made in Hollywood and scheduled to ensure sales and a notable distribution. Zwick risks, but ends up saturate US military adventures in Africa. Despite the sensitivity of the subject, because the argument, in its simplicity, not rummages what should in the vampire look industrial and capitalist society puts on this corner of the world backward and barbaric, theft and dismembered, always waiting for the redemption by way of the escape of those massacred leaves graceful. Leonardo di Caprio, Dijmon Hounsou and Jennifer Connelly are three perfect actors. There is no any hits. They are outstanding. What the script does not complete. Superb Di Caprio in the last section of the film. Blood diamond is an acceptably eye-catching film. It's like a best-seller made film. The film that we are talking about is an impostada hibridacióm of social criticism and sacaperras unequivocally. Everything that WINS by their doneness of NGOs lost it its commercial sweetness that has. I do not know if I stay with the plasticity of the war (excellently filmed) thing or the mediocrity of the social position, giving the target (isn't hard to the aberration of the spot) but not deepens. There is no significance. Everything stays in a disappointing light tone.
2,623
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/443
Kiko de España
Domino
2
5
muchocine
The script lacks importance, because the plot is so confusing as loose, and the characters fail to connect with the spectator.
It begins to lose Tony Scott, that after the great fire of revenge now returns to his characters in salons hotels that point some bellows to others while he puts a music parody aspect. The story of Domino Harvey, I suppose that at this stage I'm already all know, me going to jump. Scott continues filming more levels than Michael Bay and still saturate colors and different racords the screen.The script lacks importance, because the plot is so confusing as loose, and the characters fail to connect with the spectator. Well, of Keira if, but by his Angel face basically. To forget the "sex scene", almost as sonrojante as the Alone in the dark, just that more cool.Echoes of Kill Bill, his previous film (these dancers subtitles) and true romance in a tape in which highlights are (care) Ian Ziering, Brian Austin Green (you sound like?) and credits. (the initial and the final, splendid). A 4.
2,624
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1122
Enrique Colmena
Mujeres en el parque
1
5
muchocine
It tells well, tells a story more or less close, but the script is regrettable and a stodgy end in plan folletín the William Sautier Casaseca way with children and parents hairpieces and incidental, not ends precisely to improve it.
Felipe Vega is a filmmaker already long history, but without a single (even small) success at the box office; seeing his latest film, "Women in the Park", are understood the reasons: tells well, tells a story more or less close, but the script is unfortunate, with middle class family in process of separation, his only daughter, and the many times that they meet (Incidentally, almost always at a table with food: why not her have entitled "Women in the restaurant"?) (Have you had been more informed?) to discuss your neuro. What follows again, as we already knew, that write scripts in tandem with writers (in this case with Manuel Hidalgo, despite the film buff pedigree of this? does a quarter-century ago was critical in frame magazine, amongst other means?) is not good idea, because you know that the knowledge they have writers in the world is through literature, which will be very artistic, but since then little Royal. A stodgy end in plan folletín the William Sautier Casaseca way with children and parents hairpieces and consequential, does not end just improve it. And it is that Felipe Vega, as well as making films on nearby people, should ensure that these people seem to be possible, inhabitant of the Earth, not of Mars?
2,625
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1953
Daniel Galindo
Dios o demonio (I love Miami)
2
5
muchocine
A film about the life of Fidel Castro in Miami? What laziness! It was the first thing I thought, although sometimes, even of the most absurd draws interesting conclusions.
Castro is sick. That is what they say from their Government in Havana. Indeed that it has disappeared and that is the news that have been known to earn time to prepare for the transition to another representative. On this premise, which could well be true, reached approaches, these Yes, far removed from reality.Avowed my initial reluctance I must tell you that it was not for both. That her endured and not only that, that also, at times, I entretuve, although without reaching become an adherent to the proposal. Much of it lies with situations surreal, impossible to reproduce if not with the help of a good actor, which squeezed a crazy script and gives courage, because this have the drama of the balseros from the most illustrious of them have crumbs.Juan Luis Galiardo I think is one of the great live performers, but I sometimes too intoxicated to be confused person with character. Cadiz has my sympathy, but this is not enough because sometimes I do not see anything on the screen than him (despite his good characterization), so appreciated the sway of the plots, that dot the comic story to other characters, as interpreted by the child, a methodical actor already was in the fiction of Antonio Banderas and Catherine Zeta-Jones in the second installment of the adventures of the Zorro.Deof the nod to the supposed news, it going to the movies with a social conscience. The new Fidel aventurilla helps us to know other Cubas and other Cubans forced (envelope) live off the island. It is here where give rein to our concern at the prospect of seeing what has generated the Castro regime outside its boundaries.It is true that there is a histrionic and pamplinoso veil that blurs the reality, but also the political debate may arise from the irony and farce. Credibility is another matter to leave them to you. A note in conclusion: I had opportunity to see her in the Festival de Málaga, free; This leads me to believe objectively using the rule of 6 euros per entry so, certainly, reconsidered me this review.
2,626
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2530
José Antonio Bermúdez
Whisky Romeo Zulu
3
5
muchocine
Controversy. It is the word that best defines the life of the complainant film, containing flammable material. It also the first film of Piñeyro as director.
Take this document called WHISKY ROMEO ZULU, after the tragedy which led to the crash of the TAM plane at the airport in Sau Paulo, with 200 dead, on 17 July as a warning.At 20: 54 on August 31, 1999 the failed takeoff at Aeroparque Jorge Newbery (Buenos Aires) a twin-engine Boeing 737 (registration LV-WRZ) of lines air private Argentinas (LAPA), whose destination was the city of Córdoba (Argentina), culminates with a dismissal at the South head of the track. The aircraft destroys the beacons of track, the perimeter fence crosses Avenida Costanera, where runs over three vehicles, destroys the coastal wall, assails a crane and a stand of gas for finally finishing uncontrolled embedding in a slope of land that serves as a limit to a crowded field of golf driving range. 67 People die.Enrique Piñeyro knew what could happen. In fact, denounced it much before that tragedy to occur. You've not heard him. and cast you the company in which it was pilot: LAPA. Terrible fulfilled forecast. The maker became director of film to tell their story and, incidentally, was erected in hero. It is not the Superman flying layer or intergalactic sword. but the brave human, which has enough courage to confront the company for their professionalism. "Piñeyro directed Whisky Romeo Zulu (WRZ, relating to the registration of the aircraft)."In the company's interest the chanta wrong unionized. The serious professional is a figure that is opposed, break you the balls, he complicates flights, generates costs, they have no interest. "Is as saying, my selection of staff does not point to your efficiency or to your professional quality, but that points to your ability to be bowed by the interests of the company."[statements Enrique Piñeyro in the lover, April 2005]Controversy. It is the word that best defines the life of the complainant film, containing flammable material. It also the first film of Piñeyro as director. Previously, it had participated as a producer and actor in Garage Olimpo (Marco Bechis, Argentina, 1999). Between a style that airing American classicism, and the skill in making use of direct images without going through the documentary, and combine a shocking sound at the climax of the film, arises a powerful film that takes the Viewer from the first minute of footage. The film is an exercise in practicality and simplicity. In this case, the media (film) justify the ends (get to the audience the facts), and a person so far, had been out of the Middle, but that she knows his marvelous power. A miracle. And we speak in the first person, because this is the film of the hero director.del.Argentine production of 2003. Piñeyro takes almost three years to shoot her, through his production company. He participated in the 2004 Bafici, winner of the audience award, it opens in Argentina a year later (April 2005). That same year at the 11th Mostra of Cinema Llatinoamericà of Lleida, the Argentine film won the award for Best Director. It is the only presence of the film at Spain. No one knows more. When land WRZ? In 2006, Piñeyro premiered force Air Corporation. The end credits of WRZ unfold in this interesting documentary, which alleged the incompetence of the Ministry of defence in the management of airport traffic, civilian. Such is the stir that hours after its premiere the Argentine Government decides to transition to a civilian management body. Almost nothing.
2,627
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3204
JLO
Matanza
4
5
muchocine
Do a hard but necessary, project done with dignity, showing the most painful sides of this country with erratic path to backtrack to the President and his failed phrase:?We are condemned... to success?.
Documentary film Argentine relates the follow-up during four years of several marginal families, in their struggle to achieve health, work, education and that was the germ of the piquetero social movement coinciding with the weak Government of NATO (and its visible head the President De La Rua), movement which took in check to the Government releasing the unfortunate events of December 2001. Divided into two distinct halves, a social and more attractive, and a second with a more political tinge and opens their eyes to those who look at things happen only by the newspapers and tv channels, usual Chronicle of our social situation in the province of Buenos Aires. Already from the titles (and with the right choice of the anthem by Charly García as Fund) in its first half, the four members of the documentary group Primero de Mayo (all brandishing the camera, almost always in hand) us excited with the testimonies of villagers stripped bare its faults of all kinds, both health and education materials showing solidarity between the small neighborhoods of the partido of La Matanza (more than 40) and to a lesser extent, his own mistakes without low blows, but perhaps (being the only thing questionable) a too complacent look toward them. The end (less attractive) focuses on the workers struggle and more than twenty days of roadblocks that kept in suspense so this people like Minister Bullrich and Governor Felipe Solá. Filmed entirely in video should be noted that there is no use of voice-over (common in a documentary resource), being residents who tell their stories making them so real pleasant and nearby, and also more queribles, focusing the story in only three or four people which improves both the narration to feel more closeness and empathy towards them, as for not dispersarce in the story. The approach and the stories of the protagonists between sad and melancholic, make us to know his love for the place, its projects to pure lung, his Union despite everything and overwhelming force that now up to politicians they know and fear. The duality of the title marks both the physical location of the facts narrated of the feeling that lets us the film about the future of all these people, excluded from a decent life both their own limitations and usual inaction of the politicians of the day. A hard but necessary, project done with dignity, showing the most painful sides of this country with erratic path to backtrack to the President and his failed phrase: "We're doomed". "a success". KILLING direction: Nicholas Batlle, Ruben Delgado, Fernando Menéndez, Emiliano Penelas duration: 73 minutes (Betacam SP, colour)
2,628
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2286
Rafa Delgado
V de Vendetta
5
5
muchocine
I will always remember on November 5.
Finally, after so much time looking forward to seeing it (thanks to a few rave reviews and a very promising trailer), just got back from the second session of V for Vendetta, film adaptation of the graphic novel created by Alan Moore (screenplay) and David Lloyd (drawings), back in the 1980s.My expectations were sky-high, but always accompanied by a hint of bad vibes, as the script for the movie is borne by the Wachowski brothers, creators of the Matrix. and its ineffable sequels. and with that I believe that I have already said everything. But, oh! Surprises gives life; each and every one of expectations in this film have been fulfilled without doubt, all unlike the bad vibes that gave me the word Wachowski before 19: 00 hours on the day of today, and will not underestimate.Vibrant and stunning, would describe V for Vendetta as the sensation of embobez you have to watch an exhibition of dominoes forming drawings, shapes and dimensions thanks to its peculiar effect, which has some role in an excellent sequence of the final act of the film. You know keep pace with minute to minute without getting bored at all, despite the fact that has three scenes of action be counted on the fingers of the hand in the one hundred and thirty-six minutes that comprises the footage, thanks to a direction and screenplay impeccable and elegant in identical parts. Like some interpretations you sublime part of the cast, but especially by a Natalie Portman in State of grace. A brilliant interpretation yours, that I am not surprised nothing that carry several nominations at various film festivals. And Hugo Weaving, the star of the role and who plays v, uncertain character hidden behind a mask of Guy Fawkes, to which you do not see the face in the film, but that he wasted some sympathy and overwhelming charisma.I do not know if the V for Vendetta film (and James McTeigue-do led?) is a good adaptation of the graphic novel. But one thing that I have left very clear: is a fucking great movie. For all these reasons I have mentioned, and as much more, deserve plenty of the first 10 of the year. I will always remember on November 5.
2,629
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4144
Sandavito
Beaufort
3
5
muchocine
Even if you have many common places, Beaufort is a film worth, with an extreme situation in which soldiers, only can resist vain until they give you the order to leave, while they consolidate their ties of friendship.
Taking advantage of its nomination for an Oscar as best foreign language film, let's talk about a little bit of Beaufort, Estadounidense-Israelí Joseph Cedar.Beaufort, (from the French, strong bonito), it is a castle of Arab origin occupied by Crusaders in the 12th century. As a point of interest, strategic, and located in the territory of the Lebanon, it was taken by the Israeli army from 1976 until 2000, year in which the last troops withdrew. Beaufort, the film tells the life of these last Israeli soldiers entered a part of history.Joseph Cedar signs a formally correct tape, with an abundant cast, and giving more strength to the characters and their relationships that the historical and political environment in which they are framed. In fact, such a situation of war no longer a mere abstraction, an enemy completely invisible, and often nonexistent, with a castle considered sacred to go to soak up the Sun, and, ultimately, with a handful of kids playing to be greater.Ron Leshem, Israeli writer of great success, which we saw in the last week of Experimental cinema in Madrid, wrote his book Im Yesh Gan Eden (if heaven exists) that is based the film, and has also collaborated in the writing of his screenplay. Journalistic source, he was awarded in 2006 the highest existing in Hebrew literature, the Sapir Prize award. Focusing mostly on the relations of these kids that, necessarily have to perform military service of three years, Leshem develops a claustrophobic argument, in clear parallels with the labyrinth of tunnels that make up the Israeli fortress. Nevertheless, and despite a great turning point in the first half hour of the film, these relationships are seeing reduced to a succession of give-and-take between a novice and immature, obsessed official to comply with the orders, and his group of soldiers and friends who think only leave the place as soon as they can. The official, finally, will be redeemed and will return as the prodigal son to the Israeli home.Beaufort is a film that makes long, because it has a huge flaw: the pace. Halfway more or less, everything is going well, but then it breaks down, taking in some character development that we deem, they knew before all were already friends before, or were neighbouring or something similar. Because everytime a new soldier arrives at the detachment, all are treated with great naturalness, leaving the Viewer to doubt among if all are truly colleagues long ago, or in the army Israeli all are as well, or, as seems more likely, he plays with the time of the narrative in a way so sharp in every scene can have gone weeks without that nothing and nobody will so indicate.We have also, of course, present the typical aspirations of the sub-plots: the soldier who wants to be a musician, who has a girlfriend in New York and will go see it when licencien you, the soldier who attends volunteer place because their relatives perished there.But let's talk about technique, which is where this movie stands. The realization, without being a great display, is quite adequate, achieving the desired effect of claustrophobia, thanks to a décor that fulfils its role perfectly. After the initial level to the Cube, we will be immersed in a maze of oppressive metal tunnels that represent security, while open spaces to symbolize the danger, because the enemy can bombarding with artillery at any time. Photography of the Israeli Ofer Inov, fairly realistic, encourages and emphasizes these two aspects. Yishai Adar music accompanies the perfection throughout the film, performing that role, so reviled in latest major productions, escort and support the image and the plot, rather than fight to see which is superior.In short, we can say that even if you have many places common, abundant in this kind of films, Beaufort is a film which is worth. It presents an extreme situation in which soldiers, hands tied, only can resist vain until they give you the order to leave, while they consolidate their ties of friendship.As a final note, a social curiosity of the film. Apparently, it raised controversy among relatives of the dead in Beaufort because some of the actors had not fully completed the period of compulsory military service. With a part of society is thus not surprising that situations such as which presents the film have given, continue to give and give in the future.
2,630
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/499
Raccord
La máquina de bailar
3
5
muchocine
Nice and entertaining?The machine dancing? It has the freshness of the film laughing if same, conscious of its few claims and quality. Get as far as aim, and nor is it reasonable to ask for much more.
Some friends who meet daily in a Hall of slot machines to play a dance game, are forced to participate in an international competition of the game by getting into a mess with a few Legionnaires. The film starts a mode so appealing, but will gradually falling into easy clichés of the genre, to constitute a script made blatantly with template and holds few surprises. Even so, so funny and friendly tone that has given Oscar Aibar, as well as numerous references to films, which homage, Karate Kid or Rambo the most obvious, is that "La machine de Bailar" becomes a nice title and with some interest.In the distribution, highlight Jordi Vilches, conditioned by his physical to the same role of pringadete that we have seen in many movies, but that shows that he has talent, and chameleonic Santiago Segura with the hair to the afro and sheathed in a suit drive, worthy of the Soul Train in the 1970s. As says rake, photography is very good, something with double merit that is usually only notice that paragraph when the film is boring.Nice and entertaining, "La machine de dance" has the freshness of the film laughing if same, conscious of its few claims and quality. Get as far as aim, and nor is it reasonable to ask for much more.
2,631
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/336
Tito Chinchan
El liguero mágico
1
5
muchocine
A pestiño that in his time should serve to refine more than one unrepentant jamaipanese zambomba. This not the saved nor Esteso in his best seasons.
The lofts of the Costa del Sol spend, but of time there where catch them. My Maaaaadre.The film is a girl who is the heir to a wealthy landowner (Ozores) who dies under mysterious circumstances. When you receive the inheritance to the luxurious mansion of his uncle (the dead landlord) service makes life impossible, given who want to keep them the lion's share. And there appears a notary intern (or something, I learned well) is nothing more and nothing less than Pajares, which is responsible to tell you that it has fallen. But the thing is entangled and leaving many pubic hairs, breasts and fondling impudent.Bad, bad, bad, but bad, bad, bad. Is there where catch her, given that doesn't make much sense nothing in the film. It is saved, as always, the performance of Ozores which kills me laughing. Pajares makes it always, but dressed in time. Adorn the film a couple of girls in porretas, who wear medium liguero each and have the key to the treasure. Funny political jokes, the style of "Escaped in disguise, as Carrillo" and many similar are.In short, a pestiño that in his time should serve to refine more than one unrepentant jamaipanese zambomba. This not the saved nor Esteso in his best seasons.Besitos.P.D: The inclusion of a man gay Wolf is the most ludicrous of the history of dandruff.
2,632
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/915
Caruco
Ratónpolis
3
5
muchocine
The comical, not by simple is stupid, nor scenes of action, at full speed, whether in boat, blender or recycled toaster; become monotonous.
Go my vote for the best animated film of the year to "British", failing to see "Happy feet", and taking into account the relative disappointment of "Cars" (technically incredible) or boredom of "Ice age 2: the thaw" (how is he was a taquillazo in the world?).Entertaining is at least funny, and its footage is not stretched too. When you can start to tire come the final scenes and it ends. Another thing is that its leaders had decided that they were before a genius and they pulled the House out the window, spending $ 90 million, more 30 in advertising, going from the endearing and handcrafted clay and plasticine "Wallace Gromit " or "Chicken run." "Evasion on the farm" to the computer-generated animation. An investment which will have to recover on DVD.Literally evacuated of her luxurious mansion to pull the chain of a water, its protagonist, Roddy (original voice of Hugh Jackman in English, with Fele Martínez in Spanish), English socialite mouse goes to an underworld of sewers; a replica in miniature, and rodent version of Londres.Babosas singing.There you will discover the adventure, the value, the company and of course love the whiskers of Rita (original voice of Kate Winslet in English, and María Esteve in Spanish), a reply to scale ratuna of Lara Croft.El evil of the function is the Toad (voiced by Ian McKellen in the original, Javier Gurruchaga in the dubbed version), a copy of its kind traumatized by an event of his childhood and also associated with Prince Charles (!)do, and is that winks to the Royal family are constant, good evidence that this is a product typically? british?.It could not miss any homage to Bond, even that appear conveniently caricatured American and especially French, to inspector Clouseau in the strokes of frog (Jean Reno, original voice). And there are more, but not abused, Nemo, Frank Capra?But the best is in the secondary characters as a bobalicón and huge bully, or especially the appearances of a few canals slugs, in the purest style The Platters, which like dare to sing the "Bohemian like you" from the Dandy Warhols as Tina Turner's "Proud Mary" or the "What? does s new Pussycat?" of Tom Jones.Aardman vs. Dreamwoks.Y, Hallelujah!, the comical, not by simple, is stupid, or scenes of action, at full speed, whether in boat, blender or recycled toaster; become monotonous. There are even trompazos and hilarious blows. Who I was going to say that to me? Enemy staunch as I am easy falls.Do the funny thing is that "British" without being anything intellectual or complex, but also rather on the contrary, a worthy? divertimento? for children and adults, has broken the Alliance of the Aardman Features with Dreamworks Animation, controlled by powerful Jeffrey Katzenberg. Not only because of lukewarm box office results, but also why Katzenberg wanted to include a more "American" humor, helpings and winks to other titles of the factory Dreamwoks, as "Shrek" or the less memorable "The espantatiburones".Katzenberg is business, about the Aardman more artistic vision and a possible agreement with the Disney/Pixar perhaps trusty us moments of greatest glory.
2,633
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3121
Adrian Bravo
Héros
4
5
muchocine
Video art and caught the hand SOAP. It is worth approaching Héros forgiving defects and applauding the audacity and the balls to say: this is what there is.
The film Bruno Merle is like a marathon. The initial moments correspond to the illusion and the initial nerves of the athlete by the breakneck race that awaits you. After those frantic moments of euphoria, followed others quite predictable, even bland, sprinkled with sudden accelerations in tracing length as kilograms legs fan. You have wanted to reach the goal. And without realizing one has, arrives the final Fireworks, the glorious arrival to the goal, and the race has finished. Promising approach and the absurd and surreal final are not wasted. Only for this reason worth watching this movie. It is a film risky, full of "innovations" in style, even with changes in the format of the film, from digital to 35 mm. The protagonist (Michaël Youn, well-known French and former showman of the Pataki, that great actress) is an animator of audience in sets of television three to the fourth, which I would prefer to be handsome and famous funny, totally alienated and devoid of defense mechanisms to avoid going crazy. Loss of love and the death of the father are the straw that fills the vessel, and not think otherwise kidnap singer fashion, to establish with him (and even with the film's director, with talks on several occasions) a peculiar relationship. Bruno Merle get equal parts that we feel sorrow and disgust by the character, which we odiemos and veneremos it by his audacity. But curious and really interesting of Héros is that the plastic of the film, their stylistic twists, his experimentation, that history itself is so important. Let's say they share protagonism, van completely while in the race to come up with something decent to the public, so, if history does not convince us, we can also imagine that we are in an exhibition of video art in a museum. These proposals are unlikely to materialize, but this time the cake wore enough yeast to not sink completely. Beyond of critique veiled to the mass media and the successful perverse innocence that distills the protagonist, perhaps it its better quality. On the other hand, say, if you're not a fan of Michaël Youn (highly unlikely in these parts), it may be you somewhat histrionic and sobreactuado, but in this film could afford it. Anyway, it is worth approaching Héros forgiving defects and applauding the audacity and the balls to say: this is what there is.
2,634
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3312
Francisco Bellón
Adiós pequeña, adiós
3
5
muchocine
Small goodbye goodbye is a more than correct film of intrigue, fails in its final part, but which broadly meets its goal to entertain the Viewer.
Although today is known worldwide for its interpretative aspect, Ben Affleck became known thanks to the script of the indomitable Will Hunting, co-written with his friend Matt Damon. The screenplay earned them an Oscar Academy Award in addition to the fame. Although all would think that both would continue to develop its facet of writers, only developed its interpretative vein.Almost ten years later, Ben Affleck not only returns to sign a script, but it makes his first foray in the direction, adapting the novel by Dennis Lehane. The film tells the story of the disappearance of a little girl and the subsequent research carried out two detectives private collaboration with the police. Small goodbye goodbye has a very good start, exciting and intense, in which the plot caught completely to the Viewer. Despite being well narrated, with an exciting pace and be technically well done, the film is falling in power and intensity. Simply, as the story goes enrevesando more and more without apparent reason, it ends up losing interest. Also in the final stretch you can see some bugs rookie by Ben Affleck, especially when it comes to narrate the small flashbacks that will unravel the plot. The interpretations are all a great level, although he stressed above all an extraordinary Ed Harris. goodbye little goodbye is one more than correct film of intrigue, fails in its final part, but which broadly meets its goal to entertain the Viewer. In addition, supposed debut as director of Ben Affleck that except for some rookie's own bugs, he passed examination with good note.
2,635
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1544
Javier Saz
Inland empire
4
5
muchocine
By the time a succession of images with sound not I had stuck in such a way to a seat, although during many moments I could not decipher the meaning of what he saw, the sensations and feelings were alive and intense.
On "Inland Empire" (2006) by David Lynch, first say that by the time that a sequence of images with sound not I had stuck in such a way to an armchair, although during many moments I could not decipher the meaning of what he saw, the sensations and feelings were alive and intense. I ardo in desire to see to make light in some shadows again, I am not able to do a story about the film by unfathomable and hermetic is on first viewing. "This would rather be sketches on the first time I saw"Inland Empire".""Inland Empire" is a film a contracorriente, far removed from the narrative convenional, cares more about creating sensations with the use of the image and the sound that tell us narrativamente a story (though ultimately her count). It could enter into the discussion if the film is a narrative means of expression or - as in this case - is an artistic medium that view (and cover) you philias and phobias, discussion in which I will not go for not seeing the sense.When I see a movie I want to convey me things, whether ideas or sensations, and if he does so through his plot, the putting in scene or for their performances lacks importance. And "Inland Empire" has transmitted me more things that much of the current Billboard, it conveys me fear, terror, insecurity, suspense, unreality, magic, film and art.There seems to be three narrative lines, that of actress Nikki Grace (Laura Dern), the character Susan Blue (Laura Dern) and the Polish history on which they are based, the three "stories" intersect, overlap, are doubles, are confused and converge, with a bold result and at times confusing. It may be the film more radical and sealed in forms and contents of Lynch, twinned with his debut in "Surrealist head".Lynch, after his nomination to the Oscar Award for best director at Cannes for "Mullholland Drive", is in a position to do what he wants and we are perhaps to his total work, although I can rush me.Lynch may be the current director best party brings to the sound as a narrative device. Mix of the video art, avant-garde and resources of both film narrative, visual as soundly. "Lost Highway" and "Mulholland Drive" appear to be simple sketches of this "Inland Empire".Film markedly sensitive, complex and full of autoreferencias is one of the movies that more afraid I have been seeing them, the nightmare of folly. Happily in the cinema there are still unexplored by cross roads, and this is a good example. (4) The note is also a stub. (4/4 +)
2,636
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1100
Alberto Concepción
Babel
3
5
muchocine
For who see without any kind of prejudice, it will be a wonder. But I'm staying with the feeling that this time has not been so great with Amores Perros and 21 grams.
There are films that, even knowing that they are good, do not end you convince. Do not know sometimes why, others are so achacas to other externos.y factors others by expectations. With Babel has happened to me this same: many sense of expectancy that has not been accomplished. This is in the three films of the great tandem Iñárritu and Arriaga, the worst. However, the film is good, and for who see without any kind of prejudice, it will be a wonder.The end of this particular and peculiar vital connections trilogy focuses on the same: linkages between such different lives. Four stories intertwined in the most simple way (at least taking into account what has accustomed us this Mexican Duo), addressing topics as profound as cultural diversity and human language. I say simple because I know that it could get you more out of everything: four stories separately gave to much more, the relationship between them unconvincing and it seems that finally they are incomplete.I must repeat that Babel is a good movie. But room for improvement. He has stellar moments, thanks in part to the script, the direction, and the great division which has the tape: shootout between the police and the Moroccan family; a good Pitt helping a desaprovechada Blanchett to urinate; Rinko Kikuchi (a revelation) naked before the police and a splendid Adriana Barraza trying to save the children of Pitt on the night of the Mexican desert.And although I know very well that is much better than the average films in 2006, can not so much appreciate its merit. I'm staying with the feeling that this time has not been so great with Amores Perros and 21 grams. And it is a pity, because the duo will not work together more.
2,637
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2962
Rafa Delgado
El truco final (The Prestige)
4
5
muchocine
Outstanding film by Christopher Nolan, after its acojonante 'Batman Begins', returns to shine on the big screen.
I already say in advance that I I have not read the book by Christopher Priest, so I will not go to assess how good or bad adaptation is.Outstanding film by Christopher Nolan, after its acojonante 'Batman Begins', returns to look at the screen big. 'The Prestige' (sorry, I refuse to call it as her "translated" here, 'The final trick'.), the story of a battle between two wizards and a story of revenge to the exponent, boasts a huge ensemble cast that is huge and meets more than with his workheaded by a very large Hugh Jackman, God Christian Bale, Michael Caine, and Scarlett Johansson, of which I speak a few lines below.Everything is very Nolan: excellent, with a very well-crafted script realization and Assembly and does a great job with the temporary jumps, as well as very well achieved an atmosphere and an intrigue. In addition, does not give it you any masticadito and suggests quite the Viewer after the screening, something that is appreciated in these times.The only weak point that I find is that, perhaps, depending on the patience of one, can be a little larguita.
2,638
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/926
Oscar Cantero
Harry poter y el caliz de fuego
3
5
muchocine
It is not perfect, it is not wonderful, but it is more than enough to have us attached to the Chair during their more than two hours and a half of duration.
Even recognizing that I've never been a great fan of the adventures of the young Wizard, I must admit that Harry Potter is one of the greatest social-century phenomena. On the one hand, Rowling books have managed to start to millions of children in reading than in the times in which we live is quite longer. And on the other hand, the film adaptations of his novels have dragged huge masses of not so children rooms.This fourth installment could be the more accurate translation of the book which is based, but perhaps why lack you certain connection between their scenes, which means that at times give us the impression of being a sort of stories that occur, instead of a whole. The central thread turns, as I guess that many already know, on the International Quidditch Cup, a tournament of magic to three schools and the return of Aquel-that-not-should-be-Nombrado.Es the first time that a British director Mike Newell (four weddings and a funeral), directs a film of this saga, and is noticeable in many respects, as a way of marking the tempo of the film. That Yes, if someone his remaining doubts, have to say that this is not a particularly appropriate for children film, as well as its predecessors. Moreover, the action scenes, full of epic, sautéed with great special effects and a few dialogues of considerable height are appreciated. Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) continues to grow as an actor (obviously his physical growth), and the presence of Ralph Fiennes contributes to luster, once again, the adventures of the young Wizard. It is not perfect, it is not wonderful, but it is more than enough to have us attached to the Chair during their more than two hours and a half of duration.
2,639
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1475
Tito Chinchan
Ases calientes
4
5
muchocine
Ultraviolenta film of mobsters and killers, which runs mostly in a hotel, showing us the more elaborate methods to kill someone. I am not loved, but I am convinced that will become a reference of the genre film.
The theme of the translations of the titles of the films is curious. For example in this, have gone from being ases smokers to hot ACEs, which is much more revealing to the Viewer. By the way, do not understand why English is called ACEs smokers, given that smoking almost no one in the movie. ACEs if they leave, awhile.The film is about a mobster chivato called Israel another mobster wants to settle and that start you the heart by a "remove me beyond sentences". So offer a million of dollars for this vital body, which makes that a group of assassins of the most disparate, come and each of which more and more violent and despicable. In these, a pair of FBI police are dealing that not kill you, given that is key in a case against the Mafia.Madre mine, that orgy of rites and more shots, violence and more violence. A Symphony of brutality is not suitable for the tender and sensitive eye. There were moments of the movie that I estresaron a lot, either by the volume as always is brutal, or by the amount of nasty things that passed. That I said that can be counted the same with a little more than subtlety. But leaving that aside, I have to admit that I was surprised much of the same development and that under violent doses there is a script and a story with an interesting and surprising ending. To say that my medium Zucchini I liked it is all.In short, ultraviolenta film of mobsters and killers, which runs mostly in a hotel, showing us the more elaborate methods to kill someone. I am not loved, but I am convinced that will become a reference of the genre film.
2,640
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3532
Sandra Ríos
Babel
4
5
muchocine
This film perfectly describes the differences generated by males due to our cultural roots, language and borders.
Babel is a very good film, the young Mexican director Alejandro González Iñárritu, which is already accustomed us to see good movies with their label. Other titles like "21 grams" in 1993 and "Amores Perros" of the year 2000, also confirm; In addition to these same films, are part of what he called the "death trilogy", according to the recent interview in "Critical eye" program of CNN in Spanish. Babel has been awarded the Golden Globe Award as best film drama, at the Cannes film festival, received the award for Best Director, and was also two award-winning "Gotham", afforded by the New York critics, and award gives recognition to the independent film. Now, it is one of the big nominees to carry one or more of the Oscar Awards. This film is nominated in 7 categories which include: best film, Best Director, best supporting actress, best band Sonara, etc.Babel is a film that represented quite a challenge for both the director and the cast, because it was carried out on three continents and in four languages. In fact, this is based the film; barriers generated by language and cultural differences. González cost a year to finish the filming of Babel and according to their same actors was all a journey physical and psychological, as they live each of his characters. In this regard and in his own words, this has said its director on the film:. "the best of Babel was that I started shooting a film about the gap between human beings, the physical and the language barriers, but along the way I realized that was making a film about what unites us"love and hatred. "It is very possible that what makes happy a Moroccan and a Japanese is very different, but what makes us feel bad is the same for all". And with regard to sharing this mentioned: "..." "It is one thing to lead actors in a language you don't know, but also is directed to people who are not actors in a language you don't understand."Regardless to this film is one of the big winners or not, on the night of the Oscars, I recommend seeing this movie, I hope, on the "big screen". It describes perfectly the differences generated by males due to our cultural roots, language and borders. Not particularly I attach to you excellent rating, because its end left me wanting to see a final palpable, seen and not one that the viewer imagine. I wanted to really know what happened. But the two films that are part of this trilogy, can go to see her without a problem have been. But I really recommend to do so, in particular 21 grams with Sean Penn, Naomi Watts and Benicio del Toro who qualify for excellent.
2,641
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4322
Andrés Pons
Ahora o nunca
2
5
muchocine
Saved from the unmitigated disaster by the two monsters who are burdened with his charisma to rescue the film from the absolute apathy.
Director ROB REINER was once someone really important with a list of films which highlighted the Princess Bride, MISERY, account with me among others. Eventually demonstrated talent stay completely buried in a list of products simply abominable from our history to say there would foreshadow anything good in his career.For resurgence has convinced two of biggest performers of the time to work together, they agree on top for the first time on screen. Of course I mean the winner of several Academy Awards that already coincided with REINER on some good men JACK NICHOLSON accompanied by an actor diametrically opposite style of interpretation because it is quite more content as shows it his works in a mano a mano in without forgiveness or imprisonment, I mean no doubt also great MORGAN FREEMAN.Despite the very different styles of both, chemistry is established from the outset is totally key to sustain a loose film.A paved with good intentions but not in this film makes film quality, is burdened by a script seen a thousand times, by little credible situations again by an address without force which signed and some air to TV in his mediocre mise en scène.Nor highlights technically, or in your photography, music or costume, being the typical drama of desktop where you try to do cry by very sobados by the film dramatic mechanisms which leads to boredom.Saved from the unmitigated disaster by the two monsters who are burdened with his charisma to rescue the film from the absolute apathy.
2,642
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1672
Florinda Chic
El síndrome de Svensson
2
5
muchocine
It is the influence of Sunrise which is not little, and that kind of absurd humor that it but with an abusive tendency to navel-gazing, what is the largest failure of this film and so many others of the recent film Spanish. What was invented the acknowledgements in the closing credits section?
Stendhal could see this film quietly and without palpitations Svensson syndrome is not a majestic masterpiece that had made him lose the sense. KEPA Sojo premiered in the film with a clueless film composed of: colorful characters, rocambolescas situations, metachistes, all the movies that we have seen, the music man who hears and his colleagues.Because this film sucks to colegueo, as if when he wanted to make a movie in the bar of a gambling den, had sworn to all the capacity that you would give a role. Apart from directing crap like this, Kepa wants to make clear that he has seen much film and the subtitles. Do do do I tell these winks?,? tributes? and parodies: psychosis, Bienvenido Mr. Marshall, the night of the Hunter, Ordet, A true story, Thelma and Louise, an Andalusian dog, with death on the heels, the husband of the hairdresser, Requiem for a dream? And if you've enjoyed all these films, as I wonder when I hear Garci shredding the films of George Cukor? why when you do a long do this?, anyway.The film is a road cañí movie in which stories on the road from Madrid to Xátiva intersect: a man looking for the woman of his life, others believed to have found and are going to get it back, a cataléptico, two rappers, two cocks, two truck drivers, a man, a pop group, a cooking?. With some you parts and it is true that the movie has moments of joke as Nacho Vigalondo dialogs or performance of secondary of the Rosa-that to see if it is to live up to its name, is an actor of first-. The cast is full of other familiar faces: Red rain, Fele Martínez, Adriá Collado, Eulalia Ramón and Pepe Sancho?The soundtrack features themes of Nosotrash and La casa azul and is another success of this tape is light and soon passes. In this?How great is my film? Sojo is the influence of Sunrise which is not little, and it is this kind of absurd humor but with an abusive tendency to navel-gazing, what is the largest failure of this film and so many others of the recent film Spanish. What was invented the acknowledgements in the closing credits section?
2,643
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2891
Tony Astonish
El caso Slevin
3
5
muchocine
Reminded me several times to others of the same genre as "Usual suspects" or "Snatch: pigs and diamonds". However, the final fabric is somewhat confusing and it is the feeling that the director and the writer have "cheated us" because there are details that do not fit us...
It is difficult to see a film noir story well told and with good doses of suspense today. And without a doubt, Paul McGuigan with his film "The case Slevin" succeeds.The film tells the story of a young man named Slevin (whose role plays, without too much conviction for my taste, Josh Harnett) is confused with a friend of his to reach the city and enters the game of two warring gangsters: the Rabbi (masterfully played by Ben Kingsley) and head (Morgan Freeman). The shadow of a gunman called Goodkat (Bruce Willis) with some whose intentions are nothing clear plans to throughout the film.In the film are mixed action sequences, with the suspense and small dressings of humor. I liked the direction of the film in which the director mixes long sequences with some very short that leave the viewer with a "puzzle" front as well. Also, the flashback at the beginning, getting us in situation. That is one of those movies in which we must not lose nor an only time, not an only detail as the to "fit" the pieces depends on this.The movie reminded me several times to others of the same genre as "Usual suspects" or "Snatch: pigs and diamonds". However, the final fabric is somewhat confusing and it is the feeling that the director and the writer have "cheated us" because there are details that do not fit us.
2,644
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1254
Yojimbo
Munich
4
5
muchocine
Spielberg has managed to reach the political correctness without neglecting the necessary formal impropriety.
I was afraid but in very good company to see the new Spielberg movie. The Princess Renoir were overflowing. I terrified on the tab of the film that lasts 2 hours and 44 minutes. My mother, which I expected.For starters, Spielberg is a great director, but as I have already stated on several occasions, his films always have their hallmark based on certain moments edulcorados not to say geeks, taken directly from the philosophy of life of the great Capra.Desde announced the filming of this film I was eager to see how King Midas would be an issue as rugged as current inspired by a tragic fact happened in the 1970s and based on a novel. Of all the new path of maturity of the Jewish genius is known. Speaks of universal themes from multiple genres such as science fiction (in the hodgepodge of A.I. in the interesting Minority Report) or takes up his great vein of entertainment with films of pure evasion and emotion as catch me if you can and the war of the worlds.In Munich Mr Spielberg has managed to reach the political correctness without neglecting the necessary formal impropriety. And as all good film not only speaks of the Jewish response to the murder of their athletes, but hell of a man who is able to execute orders without moral problems until you are in a cycle of violence and paranoia without end. And obviously begins to question what makes. All this on the shoulders of a great Eric Bana.Una film wonderful with some interpretations of award but something long. Your best virtue is that it has uncovered a new creative vein that he knows resign, as I mentioned with Cronenberg and Allen, its signs and winks to step to a cruelty and realism rarely seen in his film Spielberg.It should be noted that John Williams, prolific teacher ever there, has managed to double nomination at the imminent ceremony of the Oscars, somewhat excessive that eliminates the possibility of that other good composers such as my admired Harry Gregson Williams, make a hole.
2,645
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/592
Plissken
A scanner darkly
3
5
muchocine
A demonstration of how to use a support to enhance a story which, without it, would be more boring. But also an example of scattered narrative, which distracted and lose interest at times.
'A Scanner Darkly' is expected (by me, at least) turn of the rotoscoping technique to the big screen after failed experiments of Ralph Bakshi in the 1970s. Richard Linklater has chosen this means to adapt the eponymous story by Philip k. Dick, and seen the outcome the election has been more that appropriate. 'A Scanner Darkly' shows us a very near future, in which 20% of the American population is addicted to a very powerful drug, "substance D". Amidst the increasingly lost battle is Bob Arctor, Member of a special anti-drug body infiltrated the home of suspected traffickers, struggling to discover the original source of the "substance D", and also the fight against the devastating effects of his growing addiction. Do you can achieve Arctor win two battles facing them?Told so, the truth is that the story does not give much: is the typical story of the infiltrator caught between two fires told a thousand times (one of my favorites is 'Rush' of Lili Fini Zanuck). The novelty in this case is that the factor paranoia takes over completely from the film, to the point that we have doubt both of our perception as the same protagonist. This is the great success of the Linklater film, turn us into junkies amazed during the one hundred minutes that lasts, thanks also to the peculiar technical rotoscoped. But at the same time, is the great weakness of 'A Scanner Darkly': the main plot loses interest progressively, to the extent that ceases to tell a story and just telling a sort of collective madness, shared by Bob Arctor and his companions of skullduggery. What begins as an "undercover movie" with high technology of medium, becomes a tragicomic showcase of human miseries. And given that it was the intention of the writer of the novel as the Director, because objective fulfilled. But the loss of interest in the plot is somewhat frustrating, at the end.Acting work, despite the disfigurement resulting from the rotoscópico process, is notable. The animated image of Keanu Reeves is much more convincing than the image real (come on, serving up their "cartoon" best). Wynona Ryder defends, and the 'stars' of the hallucinogenic function end up being this strange couple of junkies (caricatures of themselves) are Robert Downey Jr. and Woody Harrelson, which appears to left of the bowling alley in the neighborhood of Jeff Lebowski. On the other hand, the recreation of that do future? in which everyone is under continuous surveillance, even the security guards themselves, it is austere enough to be credible, even recognizable today.In summary: a demonstration of how to use a support to enhance a story which, without it, would be more boring. But also an example of scattered narrative, which distracted and lose interest at times. A 6'5.
2,646
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1241
Yojimbo
King Kong
2
5
muchocine
A film unnecessary, ostentatious and that stays in a ridiculous attempt to continue with the fame and prestige that gave him the Rings trilogy.
Some remakes sound very bad nothing more mention, others interest depending on who perform and others bother to call them remake and not "tribute".In the case of King Kong, it was very difficult to beat the original, but the fame that preceded Peter Jackson and his love for the film could suspect a return of nut made with love and great respect.But only by knowing the three hours and something of the film happens sound interesting to provoke serious suspicion and even some fear. What may Jackson have added in the version of a film that lasts approximately half? Because the "fill" is not worth much.One of the aspects most care of the film is the recreation historical, very well done and supported by an outstanding art direction; the animation of the Kong is very successful and very human scale (with reason some enlightened support certain proposals: P), actors that are fairly decent? but without a doubt the best of the film is Naomi Watts, Naomi Watts and Naomi Watts.Ahora story cons: duration, charisma pomposity of Jackson reflected in countless and repetitive flat impossible (and many of them air), some sequences of surprisingly boring and topical action and with a few digital effects which at times are disastrous and shameful. And not I list all inexplicably stupid details and give you nudges to dinosaurs, the girl nor maree with so much wiggle in the hand of the Kong, etc? That if you have great moments between the eighth wonder of the world and Watts which are really suggestive, but which do not compensate for a film unnecessary, ostentatious and remains in a ridiculous attempt to continue with the fame and prestige that gave him the Rings trilogy.
2,647
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2854
Robgordon
Caótica Ana
1
5
muchocine
Caótica Ana is a very embarrassing mistake for patriotic cinema and a point negrisimo in the career of the Basque conductor, which will have to improve much on his next tape to regain the favor of your audience.
Julio Medem, one of the most important film directors Spanish, one of the most renowned authors and creator, among others, of; "Earth", "Lucia and sex" or this beautiful film that is "lovers of the polar circle", achieved with his latest film, "Caótica Ana", exasperate the viewer with an entirely self-indulgent and compromising tape, because that will expose this film already his figure more fierce criticism of the place.The Basque author has shot a film extremely inherent to his person and his environment. Almost a private craving. The history of Ana, Ibizan girl who moves to Madrid to share his paintings and learn the art and begin to suffer shocks that will take you to remember their past lives from session of hypnosis.Throughout this history, Medem has uploaded his filmic universe to the maximum. He has led his obsession with the symbolism and metaphor to the greatest extent possible, and everything to tell a story that is discovering empty and incoherent every minute that is moving footage.It begins "Caótica Ana" as an exaltation of the hippie and modern world. As an ode to the creative commune, young free and untamed and "buenrollismo". However everything sounds artificial, little credibility. Dialogs keep Anna and Linda (Manuela Vellés and baby) are impossible. Two of three conversations, are metaphorical or with pretensions of importance, something that may look good on paper, but that it is unthinkable that they have left the protagonists. And that Manuela Vellés strives to recite them. Vellés, to be her first film, is commendable. Delivery to the character of Ana is commendable. It appears in 99% of the scenes and lidia with guarantees the different interpretative nuances that are being demanded a role and a character that is not, at all, easy. The Antipodes of the interpretive effort find baby, fatal and easygoing in his role as friend and Adviser of Ana.Es precisely that air of importance, self-aggrandizement, the pretentiousness that lastra "Caótica Ana". Every movement, every moment is overloaded, each scene with a transcendence that prevents the naturalness, which avoids any hint of emotion. There is a scene in which Ana says not find depth in his paintings, but bet on simplicity. Just the opposite what Medem has wanted to do with "Caótica Ana".But where made leads "Caótica Ana"? Required this story such a degree of abstraction? The case is "Caótica Ana" proving finally empty. Little point in us act to join the pieces of that puzzle regressive, full of fades in black and landscapes striking of hypnosis and reincarnation, of parents, women, conceptual art and sex and naked free, "Caótica Ana" is just the story of a misguided, impulsive, dreamy and rebellious girl. The simple story of a hippie aimlessly to which Medem has elevated to the category of goddess that summed up his vision of the feminine power. "Too much artifice for so little.""Chaotic Ana" is the worst work of Medem to date. Addressed erronemente to an immature audience. A continuum of irrational moments of sequences forced and crammed with shoehorn (the history of Lluis Homar, the shabby cameo of Antonio Vega, in the purest style Caetano Veloso in "Talk to her"), which only highlights the beautiful photography and locations, the mystical music of Jocelyn Pook (composer of "Eyes Wide Shut") and the debut of Manuela Vellés. the final sequence of "Caótica Ana" is the image of the Spanish film industry; politicized and lacking in good taste. A shameful and embarrassing sequence. Ugly. Capricious and unnecessary. Even its presence within the plot has a minimal justification.That Medem, one of the banner of the national film scene directors, has filmed a sequence like that, is something truly disturbing and demonstrates the serious health condition of our film, which is very difficult to defend. "An end of film so vulgar and inappropriate to punish the Spanish film on his knees, facing the wall, for 12 hours.""Chaotic Ana" is a very embarrassing mistake for patriotic cinema and a point negrisimo in the career of the Basque conductor, which will have to improve much on his next tape to regain the favor of your audience.
2,648
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2758
Kiko de España
Spiderman 3
2
5
muchocine
A giant, but backwards step. Thomas Haden Church, excellent in a role that needed more footage or a film that needed fewer characters is only saved.
Without news of Sam, so clear. Spider-Man 3 could be directed by Brett Ratner, Tim Story, Mark Steven Johnson. There is no trace of the imagination of Raimi, an original proposal, nor a coherent approach. all about rush and noise, and also it takes 90 minutes to boot.It does not reach the extremes of Batman and Robin, but they have things in common.The first movie of the amazing man spider found me an excellent attempt with a sensational morning that was then lost between software. With the second I took a pleasant surprise: the blows of humor functioned and the characters not desmadraban.Now neither good jokes (only one after the first encentro with Flint Marko) or excellence in the visual section, more of the same but worse, faster, larger: boring. The adult stage of the character has eighth of a E.G.B. dyes A giant, but backwards step. Thomas Haden Church, excellent in a role that needed more footage or a film that needed fewer characters is only saved. Venom? If passing by. The rush are very bad. And the habit of not wearing mask.
2,649
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2740
Kiko de España
Mamá es boba
4
5
muchocine
Intolerable cruelty. So surreal and tronchante as hard and geek. If you have not seen are taking as much as I do not see his new movie!
Despite being on vacation I've been a very productive week and I have not seen yet the second feature film by Santiago Lorenzo, something which I will do shortly. I used a little free to get MOM this is boba, a movie that does not have too many differences with the films of Wes Anderson and Todd Solondz. Her remembered it cruel and it is, it is of balls. Toribio and gem are the parents of Martin, a kid with problems at school. They live in Palencia and are, in their own way, happy.A good day local TV appears in their lives and starts the nightmare. Eduardo Antuña front of an absolutely delivered cast, the good and the bad. Funny narration of Martin and mention that party for the Orchestra of the Festival, or Todd Phillips would have been able to.So surreal and tronchante as hard and geek. If you have not seen are taking as much as I do not see his new movie! If not you made clear, the movie is a punch in the lower abdomen, but absolutely necessary.
2,650
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/246
Tito Chinchan
Vecinos invasores
4
5
muchocine
Child film suitable for all audiences, from the smallest to the largest, to see with the eyes as dishes
I do not is that they have the zarigüellas, but they are fashionable. The two latest movies I've seen animation appear these friendly animals which in my life I shall be released. Incidentally, that rarest family, with a Patriarch turtle turtle, a daughter Skunk seeking love, a raccoon that trafficking to be adopted, an oscuras squirrel, a subfamily of zarigüellas and a few playful porcupines (who share family responsibilities, by the way). And the bad milk of humans who want them to exterminate, really. In the end.The film is a strange family of animals that rise from his hibernation and discover that they are surrounded by a luxurious urbanisation, where before there was a lush forest. As they have been without food, are advised by a raccoon to get eaten by humans, with the risks that this entails. But the Patriarch of the family, a turtle, fails to see the plan, unclear what does that the family unit tambalee.To me these films, by definition, I like a lot. And if they are also good, because I like more. In this case we have a film on family unity, diversity and equality, on the progress on the coexistence of humans with the rest of beings of the Earth, about teamwork, even about love. And is that we know that these films have to atufar moralina on all sides so that the elderly can say "see for the values it instills" and not that we enjoy with children's animation films. The plot is quite childish, which is very appropriate given that it is oriented for children. The argument develops quite agile, with few moments of narrated moralina, what is to be welcomed. And it has many moments of humor for everyone. Deserves special mention, in the Spanish version, the dub of Luis Merlo in the body of turtle. I think that it is the role of his life and that if that turtle speak, should be with that voice.In short, film suitable for all audiences, from the smallest to the largest. To see with eyes as dishes, in the same way that see it boys.
2,651
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/505
Silvia Giner
Xmen3
2
5
muchocine
Definitely the pace of the movie I did not like at all, will solve things in a very cumbersome way and certainly the script leaves much to be desired.
The fast that the facts occur is dizzying, 1 hour and 48 minutes in which case everything. We learned that Jane had died, ciclope finds her, dies, know new X-Men, go deeper into the history of the revived, war breaks out and they die "for free" two of the most important icons of this Marvel. definitely the pace of the movie I did not like at all, will solve things in a very cumbersome way and certainly the script leaves much to be desired.Well the effects as always and the scene of X that fascinates us and draws us, but my really not liked by what I explained earlier.Except Phoenix which is wonderful and your performance is to remove the hiccups and and and and aaaaaah I love it is end of Magneto, although some say that it is your imagination I me ilusiono thinking that disgusting vaccine is not "eternal" and its effects have just been pronto.porque.No mistake who would not like a man X? Ummm I almost orgasmizo think so, a being so wonderful and different from everything. I also bother me if they try to change me (and the system does not already?), no doubt I become a girl magnet, I am with him, I think in this release than any we see the "least bad" bad (mm brings me some reminiscencian to V for Vendetta, are bad, really bad? or they are a product of the environment in which operate?).All this leads me to think about possible men - X of our society, because any. to the best have no wings or throw fire, but they are distinguished from the rest by having something that makes them unique and special. However always there is someone who wants to "cure". Nobody here wants to heal, we like the concept X, we like to do differ? XDDD.
2,652
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/934
Tito Chinchan
Happy feet
5
5
muchocine
Tremendous film of animation that won't leave anyone indifferent. We will be able to excite us, rejoice, laugh, jalear, singing and dancing without blushing. Dare, so it will be well.
Come Christmas and the producers get their best clothes to fill the cinemas with our small shoots. Worse, in many cases, focusing on light peliculillas, not inciting adult accompany their children. With this film, you've got a mix that I don't have anything clear to convezca for the elderly or children. For children I think it gives something of fear and elders are not receptive to receive criticism. In the end.The film is about an Emperor Penguin which, although egg, is falling to his father. For this reason was born with a peculiarity, not can sing like the rest of their species, but has a gift for dancing. In the society in which he lives is not well seen, is marginalized and discriminated against. One day, by chance of fate, known to other penguins, who communicate in a different way.I loved this recording, and for several reasons. On the one hand, the graphic quality is impressive, brushing the perfection. In many moments, you can doubt if we see a tape of animation or a curious documentary. The soundtrack, aspect you never mention, found it me very suitable, of those that oblige your armchair companion to draw you attention to make sure to follow the compass with the foot. The argument is not loose, from a film Billy Elliot ending with the Lord of the rings epic style. In conclusion, I would like to highlight two aspects that make it a very special film, the subtle (well, not this is subtle) criticism to the organized and hierarchical religions, and on the other hand the review that gives to human beings as regards the maintenance of natural resources and conservation. Very large. Oh, I do not forget the "Cuban" friends that is, have a few dialogues to hear party.To sum up, tremendous film of animation that won't leave anyone indifferent. We will be able to excite us, rejoice, laugh, jalear, singing and dancing without blushing. Dare, so it will be well.
2,653
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1112
Jeremy Fox
The holiday
3
5
muchocine
An entertaining comedy romantic to have a good time without complications nor requirements but fully respectful of the intelligence of the Viewer.
Every year premiered a film for Christmas which aims to drag to the cinemas to all those who are not watching action movies, adventure, flying dragons or cartoons.If the year passed the winner between this type of tapes was "The jewel of the family", this year it has the turn to "The Holiday", the new film by Director Nancy Meyers, signatory of "what think women?" and "When least so expect you".The official synopsis (summary) is as follows: A little before Christmas, Amanda (Cameron Diaz) and Iris (Kate Winslet) decide that they need to get away as much as possible their respective boyfriends (Rufus Sewell and Edward Burns) so they agree to exchange their homes for two weeks. Shortly after install at home of Amanda in California, Iris lock friendship with Arthur (Eli Wallach), a famous writer of the golden age of Hollywood, and thousands (Jack Black), a composer. Meanwhile, in England, Amanda known Graham (Jude Law), the brother of Iris?We must not forget that we we have a film whose only mission is to entertain. There is no pretentiousness here. It is a conventional romantic comedy. But well done.In that regard, the script follows typical patterns of the romantic comedy with the particularity of being telling two stories in parallel. It can blame you being a bit more length (while watching the film one not noticing), not having better drawn the character of Jack Black and not have dared to Jude Law's character was a crápula with all of the law, which have to take out the manga quite implausible.No one can escape nor that much of the appeal lies in the protagonists. In this case I would say that they meet all perfectly although, as I insinué before, soon you can do Jack Black with a character so lacking in content. I especially like Kate Winslet and Eli Wallach, two big players of very different and distant generations, whose relationship is the most beautiful of all of the film.In summary, an entertaining comedy romantic to have a good time without complications nor requirements but fully respectful of the intelligence of the Viewer.
2,654
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2881
Ramón Balcells
Amor y otros desastres
2
5
muchocine
To my I was afraid to think that the film collapsed by this incredibly bland ability to tell the facts, that totally impersonal photography or many gags (some funny, yes) which is worthless or the penalty laugh for them.
Since that the great Notting Hill film was released, the English romantic comedies that have appeared over the years not cease to be (some good, other mediocre) copies of the classic film by Roger Mitchell. The hilarious and very good Love premiered four years ago actually, a choral romantic film which, however, little resembled the already named film. But it is true that this was an exception, as many others, among which is this semi-desastre, love and other disasters, are quite simple. Focusing on the film's Keshishian, say, very briefly, that this film lacks personality, several times of coherence and a cold, distant, rare atmosphere. Since starting, shows a lack of respect to the public, not just show the characters and doesn't have a minimum of respect. And that already it tells us everything. Vale which has some other good time (the end, in the cinema), or some successful notes, but this is certainly a film together failed. And as said before, the topics that come from Notting Hill, whether the streets of London, love trouble, the final race in a small car with the typical English friends, they are all already too usual in this type of film. It is not, nor much less, a Bridget Jones or Curtis film already commented. There are exceptions to every rule in the English romantic comedy. To my I was afraid to think that the film collapsed by this incredibly bland ability to tell the facts, that totally impersonal photography or many gags (some funny, yes) which is worthless or the penalty laugh for them. And what I say of the embarrassing end (never better said)? A bad film, forgotten at the beginning of the opening credits end and with a cast of more bland (Brithany Murphy is still decent). We can say has some fun time and it just not resulting heavy, but that get quite entertaining. But it already is. Hopefully upcoming English comedy show they have something further to tell us and that they not already drink Mitchell film (written, by the way, by Richard Curtis).
2,655
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2052
Alvaro Oliva
Spiderman 3
2
5
muchocine
The story is quite simple, and despite its excessive length, fails to close all the sub-plots that creates, so successfully?Spider-Man 3? an irregular product that achieves its mission, is fill the screens of viewers...
Sam Raimi returns to place behind the scenes to "close" this trilogy starring the man spider. After the previous successes of critics and the public, "Spiderman 3" returns to achieve a sobrado triumph in what regards to spectators, but the criticism is another story. Most branded the film's child, excessively long, pantomime and other descriptions, that lower the bar of an interesting trilogy. "The truth is that they are right."Spider-Man 3 "is presented as a story noña, in which the character of Peter Parker/Spiderman shows on many occasions as a caricature, which does not present anything new, nor does the film more interesting. On this occasion, we have new faces to help increase the expectations of this third party, such as the case of: Thomas Haden Church, Thoper Grace and Bryce Dallas Howard. Of these three, the best standing is without doubt Thomas Haden Church ("sideways"), who made up a character like the sand man, full of humanity in the sobriety and coldness of a convict as which interprets. Thoper Grace also shows two expensive, much more differentiated, as photographer are the metete Eddie Brock, who will make competition to Peter in the newspaper, and the expected Venom, character that should have been given more game.If in "El Bosque" Bryce Dallas Howard has already demonstrated his talent, is checked here not what it has lost, despite the fact that his character does not go beyond the typical blonde beauty, dumb and rica. Bruce Campbell returns to his cameo in one of the jokes more funny all the footage.Focusing on the protagonists, Tobey Maguire has the opportunity to nominate a Peter Parker more self-assured, bordering the caricature, and dares to make everything you had never done before. Kirsten Dunst plays a fairly bland, who does not deserve too many qualifiers, and finally, James Franco more of the same.In short, "Spiderman 3" is presented as a film entertainment, in which Visual effects take the leading role, and that in many moments are outstanding (see the man of sand), but in many others they sing to the League. The story is quite simple, and despite its excessive length, fails to close successfully all the sub-plots that creates, so "Spiderman 3" is an irregular product that achieves its mission, fill the screens of viewers (dissatisfied).
2,656
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3223
Kiko de España
Halloween El Origen
2
5
muchocine
From 100 to 0 in 50 minutes. Zombie does not dare from ecuador. A pity because the first half of the film (until that concentrated the original fifty eternal final minutes) made us hope for the best. But not.
It desencanta me the retromake of the Carpenter classic Zombie. Let's start with the beginning. The night of Halloween was a picture of gender which lasted for 90 minutes and Halloween is a product Dimension that lasts 20 minutes more. Up there, except for the product Dimension, more or less well.The problem that I find in the movie, always from my point of view (worship extreme Carpenter, Yes, but also much respect to Zombie and his two previous films) is so brutal partition to which it is subject.The first of the two parties focuses on the childhood White trash of Michael Myers, where is güarra to the picture. Zombie demystifies the spectrum approaching her every day between mascots about to be executed, abuse, ill-treatment and absolute absence of love and touch, only some MIME of a mother who tries to be him as best as possible but who works at a night club, who lives with a drunk son of a bitch and that is mocked by fellow school of his son. Already I say, regular characters (and actors) film of Zombie which appears will give the nail on the head with the invention. The director allowed the luxury of show us the origin of the mask and show us what is sensed in the prologue to the original movie: a crude and violent, killing cold, in charge of a demon that is nothing more than a child with many problems, both physical and psychological. Very well. Furthermore, the child with the adult mask gives a bad feeling that you cagas.Now is the turn of the second part of the movie, which is as the 90-minute Halloween Carpenter, but in 50 minutes and with that touch "as Dimension" as deja vu and so disappointing.If you bother to do more real evil for fifty minutes later is that it was not necessary, because the psychopath returns to be a supernatural being by magic, and as an example of the worst film shot by Zombie so far put the scene of the escape, poorly filmed, poorly raised and resolved in a way that can believe meI fail to see in no time. You even start to bother the use above the director gives his usual frozen and slow motions. Here Zombie not moved the original to zombilandia, is the head which fits the old story and I think that this is a problem if you are looking for give something personal to an alien history. To my still giving me more fear the Forsaken that Myers Zombie.Otro crime is the third Act, where spend most of the footage of wall on wall, wardrobe closet and scares to one hundred, coming to think that the "tributes" to the original (death nailing pardillo kid and the shroud)(, for example) are even forced and stuck with shoehorn.And also I am convinced the use of original film music because it is cold.Like the recent Sleuth, while in that Branagh you risk much more than Zombie here, it's an unnecessary and quite decaffeinated remake. Even so the movie is not a disaster thanks to the fifty minutes of "prologue" and despite this fashion so terrible and unnecessary to have three finals in the same film.
2,657
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1682
Ramón Balcells
El velo pintado
4
5
muchocine
The work of Curran stands out above all in the main and final parts, showing a drama more exenso and deep where relationships are being opened and closed depending on the moment.
After seeing that the good German was not receiving a good critique, I chose to go unnoticed, since before I wanted to see her. And fortunately I saw that had premiered the painted veil, another literary adaptation with classic atmosphere. Thanks to this intelligent decision, can enjoy two hours of a very good film, classical, that Yes, but less magical than others of time.The film is beautifully directed by John Curran, almost debutant, given that it had only directed independent and unknown Praise and we are no longer two. In her second film employs techniques, dialogues and belonging to a very classic romantic era, and that situations does not mean that it is a film without personality, not. This is a film that behind his apparent simple face of simple appearance hides a personality with an enormous beauty and a delicate sense of understanding the human personality. Yes, you look like I'm echagerando, but when you see her you shall give account to the painted veil goes far beyond the typical classical adaptation, although they can hide and apparent be like this. I said at the beginning that the film is directed by an exceptional ability and is lucky to not be boring, because I've seen some films in style serve rather than as a movie as a sleeping pill (as Cold Mountain). Although Curran work stands out above all in the main and final parts, showing a drama more exenso and deep where relationships are being opened and closed depending on the moment.Another good aspect of the film is the magnificent script, based on the novel by w. Somerset Maughman. In fact, in the 1934 Richard Boleslawski shot the veil painted with Greta Garbo and Herbert Marshall, which Ron Nyswaner is not only based on a novel but that has also made a remake. And that is perhaps one of the few flaws of the film he seems too much a remake, but well, this already are used. Anyway, as I say, the script remains a unique and wonderful piece without barely cracks or slippages of pace, slow, that Yes.After talking the outstanding direction and the wonderful script, I could not finish this criticism without before naming the couple protagonist, Edward Norton and Naomi Watts. As you adored, due to the large amount of great performances that have made during his career, the two are sublime, offering us some papers human, Avengers, tender and naive and intelligent at the same time. For my taste, Naomi looks more, and is the main reason is because it goes far more than Edward. But luckily, both actors, along with secondary (Liev Schreiber and Toby Jones, mainly), make a few interpretations bright, full of charisma.Finally, emphasize more technical aspects such as the picture (great levels of landscapes, above all, or the close-up) and the music by Alexandre Desplat (winner of a Golden Globe Award for this film), which highlights the main theme on piano, which is quite exciting.In short, we have a round film, very classical air, with a formidable script and a couple protagonist rubs the Oscar. Hopefully all the modern adaptations of classic books were like the painted veil.
2,658
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4127
Patri
American Gangster
3
5
muchocine
It is an interesting film and it has quality, however, leaves the feeling of that could have been much better if Ridley Scott had not conformed with the formal quality and would have gone a little further.
In the 1970s a man named Frank Lucas became one of the biggest gangsters dealing with drug that brought directly from Viet Nam, the film account the real history of this gangster and detective who captured him.Ridley Scout has directed this film about a black mobster of the 1980s in New York, the quality of the film is very high formally, and the problem is that it is perhaps too "formal", follows the rules of the genre to strictly and not leaves nothing to innovation.The interpretations are perfect, both Russell Crowe and Denzel Washington are perfectly their roles. The character played by Denzel Washington is a mobster who with his family is loving, polite, correct and however is able to kill with one shot point-blank to full daylight in the street to a person; the other protagonist is the police played by Russell Crowe, who also has a "double life" by calling it somehow, because in his work is the most honest of all and yet his personal life is nothing short of disastrous. This duality of the characters is very well worn in the film.The film can accuse you of it has a principle very slow and too fast end, something that some will like it and others not, as is my case. I would have liked that the relationship of the police and the gangster is caught when the end it had developed more, however is resolved with four strokes which lead us directly to the end of the film.American Gangster is an interesting film and it has quality, however, leaves the feeling of that could have been much better if Ridley Scott had not conformed with the formal quality and would have gone a little further.
2,659
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1280
Verolindapechocha
Un buen año
1
5
muchocine
If they can avoid A good year, avoid it. A romantic movie is absolutely flat and full of stereotypes. A good year, but a bad film.
If they can avoid A good year (2006), avoid it. A romantic movie is absolutely flat and full of stereotypes, incredibly directed by the renowned Ridley Scott and starring the good actor Russell Crowe. In a nutshell, a scam.Crowe is Max Skinner, a cold and calculating agent of London Stock Exchange that suddenly sees her life disrupted by the sudden death of his uncle Henry, who has inherited a vineyard in France. This property represents to Max, all the memories of a happy childhood. You decide to go for a day to fix the papers and leave the House ready for the purchase, but things in life, it ends up staying more than one day, involving himself with simple things around and fell in love with the French more beautiful, the people and the simple life in the countryside. Colorín colorado. It's simple gentlemen.Scott and Crowe had worked together previously, with much better results: the Gladiator (2000). Those times.
2,660
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3535
Sandra Ríos
El buen pastor
2
5
muchocine
De Niro, not passes the test in this film, as he had many tools in their favor to have brought forward a very, but very good film.
I have a duality with respect to this film. It seems to me something cruel about branding her regular, but I am not so convinced qualify good. The second film directed by Robert De Niro, after "A history of the Bronx" in the year of 1993, tells the story of the beginnings of the CIA, as also the link to the famous sect "Skull and Bones", whose members are the innate cream of the American aristocracy, those who manage the reins of that country and the entire world, the famous Yale University students and that they say, belongs all the descendants of the Bush family; in fact, this was one of the most difficult aspects, when it comes to carrying out the film, because as sect hide that he is, was not allowed to produce even take photos on the outskirts of the beloved cloister.Since the 1990s he joined De Niro document to carry out this tape. Passionate about the subject of the spies, the policy and as United States handles a culture secret and powerful when it comes to store information; He is interested in these characters hidden, sinister and loyal to your institution and above all the scope arriving to have, even at the cost of his personal life. In his search he met Milton Bearden a spy retired CIA, author of several books on this subject. He became instrumental in executing the tape; so much so, that led to De Niro to tour various cities in Asia and Europe to illustrate vividly and unveil some secrets.All this I have told them and the time of documentation which took De Niro to develop "The good Shepherd", was what I believe, it has resulted in a film too dense and complex, so confirm that their nearly three-hour (2: 47). Hence I can enumerate them several unfortunate events for a film with good idea or theme. The film is loaded with many "flashbacks", some unnecessary, apart, each event is so detailed that his Payan is "overly" slow care. This is the most outstanding in the film; This gap in the pace. A film, so dense and complex, full of flashbacks and so long, had set aside a good share of scenes with more action or emotion. The story is so cold and calculator at the same time it becomes cansona and heavy to assimilate.I am not criticising the cast, that of luxury if it seems. Dammon, Jolie, De Niro and others fulfil their quota in the tape had not been, it would have been much worse. I not give to his greater cast transcendence, because I find it inevitable to rely more on the intention of the film, his idea and how it was carried out. Summarizing them, De Niro, not passes the test in this film, as he had many tools in their favor to have brought forward a very, but very good film. The problem was then as the good Shepherd was carried out. I guess then the conflict represented for him and his scriptwriter to develop the script, to achieve a well summarized, synthesized tape and round, a real subject with invented characters.
2,661
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/211
Raccord
Con la muerte en los talones
5
5
muchocine
Electric mounting, fast-paced script and the support of the music to create an atmosphere of suspense and speed that no one has been able to match
This film is considered by many, others (including not myself) prefer psychosis, as the best work of Hitchcock. There is no doubt what is one of the major and the most representative of his style. We found all the elements that define: electrical installation, a fast-paced script and the support of music to create an atmosphere of suspense and speed, that no one has been able to match. Hitchcock was widely criticized at the time by his "commercialism", but for which we understand that film, as well as a form of artistic expression, is a form of entertainment, filmmaker orondo is an absolute genius that deserves to be claimed.It is one of the films most commented upon by Internet of all his production, so I cannot give you can repeating data. The only thing that surprised me is that nobody mentions the crop-duster plane scene in pursuit of Cary Grant, so I'm going to pay tribute to him my particular analyzing her. Interestingly, perhaps the most famous sequence of the famous film, coolly designed absolutely no sense: do not have the bad guys a way better kill the protagonist shooting from an airplane? They are in the middle of nowhere! Did you egg! Accepting that they are not very intelligent (or very megalomaniacal) and that they have decided to kill him with a machine gun from an aircraft underway, why the first time that pass over the poor Thornill not shoot you? and more so by what noses are so very bad aim? Four times they spend and are not capable of injuring the good or one. And already to culminate the lot of Follies, why crashes the plane into the gasoline truck? Were the pilot and drunken gun? Instead, watching the film you're so mesmerized, that you not notice, and to do so, or you care. Just want to know how will be Cary Grant it. There is the magic of Hitchcock.
2,662
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3793
Carlos Giacomelli Puig
1408
2
5
muchocine
With these credentials, it was impossible that this supernatural horror blockbuster fail, right? Then go if did it.
John Cusack often choose relatively well his films. More or less all his filmography is fumable, counting with small (or large) jewels as "High fidelity" or "Being John Malkovich", and when to choose productions of rapid consumption. well, there is "Con Air", which much to many people, mola cacho.Samuel l. Jackson is somewhat lost lately, but also tends to be an actor of those "if it goes on it, something has to have the movie".We go beyond. Stephen King is an author that despite not knowing how to write, tells stories that can hook, and most importantly, they sometimes get a movie more than acceptable ("La mile green", "The shining").And, Yes, the producers are the Weinstein, but still the director chosen for "1408" is Mikael Håfström, has a fucking great name that is valued him as "author", and that in the United States debuted with the (say) mediocre-but-well-done "without Control".With these credentials, it was impossible that this supernatural horror blockbuster fail, right? Then go if did it.We are in Los Angeles, where Mike Enslin (Cusack) wins the life writing books of terror on hotels or haunted houses. To make its work more realistic, the writer is installed one night in every damn room who discovers (through advertisements) and her looks with all kinds of objects. To date never happened anything supernatural or ghostly acojonante in general, until that discover that in New York the Dolphin hotel has a room "not available" for years. Despite the attempts at persuasion by the Manager of the hotel (Jackson), Enslin ends up doing with the key of the 1408, that hold you all sorts of scares and hallucinations.On this not too original premise, should recognize that the film has some graciosilla situation (mainly thanks to the dialogues between the two actors), and some other entertaining no more entering the room. The thing promises exactly what one is expected, a film of popcorn to see and forget instantly, that may be a good way to pass the time. However, after the first half hour, interest is lost completely, and the film just becoming a soporific game no feet or head that fails to convince even the most enthusiastic of the genre.There are many problems that lead to the film the most absolute collapse, although perhaps the most important and critical of all of them is that people change. I am thinking that a few years ago, when he started the boom of the terror of ghosts, apparitions, or comings of pot mental of the protagonist in general, the easier to get the sure shock was upload the music decibels and add them to a fast zoom or close-up of something shocking (either side of pale girl, or a giant snake). It worked so well that the movies that make use and abuse of this have multiplied like ants, and that has ended up creating an impassive public before this, that needs some encouragement that it compensated the cost of a ticket. Here, the stimulus does not exist. The only thing hidden is a double final twist, which is not only quite predictable, if not worth you the same problem I have just explained. Perhaps we are not tired already of the protagonist's dead from the beginning, is locked in an insane asylum and everything is fruit of his imagination, or that the murderer is the son who returns from the dead? According to King, Weinstein, and Håfström, seems that not.If it wasn't enough, another big problem that lastra all footage is that it comes from mother the twenty minutes, and delves into a spiral of impossibilities as gimmicky and rocambolescas changing abruptly the intimate tone of the film to put it squarely in catastrophism, from scenes of psychological horror to genuine natural carnage (always in the room)(eye). The idea seems a priori good, a pace in crescendo to generate increasingly difficult situations for the protagonist, but is everything so clumsily resolved that there literally is no where catch it.And also too hard for what it is. Avoid at all costs, he is without a doubt one of the great deceptions of the season.
2,663
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/787
Dragon negro
La fuente de la vida
4
5
muchocine
I am sure that it will have its detractors and admirers, be those movies that either you love or you hate, but it will not leave indifferent anybody.
The film, in the projection of this morning has finished receiving, after a cold and timid start, quite a few applause. To begin we must say that it is not an easy film or that you understand first, indeed nor do I believe that it is necessary, and than a bad serious criticism the easy option, tar it mental straw for Aronofsky so panchos and incomprehensible. But the film deserves to be reviewed and revisionado to appreciate it in its entirety.It must be noted that the film is of impeccable beauty, from the more everyday scene to the futuristic images that are really beautiful. The storyline takes as its basis the present history and is taking us to the past and future turn. The fight of the doctor to find the experimental cure to save his wife terminal of a tumor shows us two options against the death, acceptance and denial. Accepting death in a natural way and as a symbol of humanity or clinging to life and fight to the end with all media. The man, in all his seasons, will be who find that eternal life with the woman, the polar opposite, which will be who attempts to convince him to stop something that is unfinished and may only terminate accepting the final truth.All this already commented when I made the review of the graphic novel, the film shortens in the stories of the past and future, perhaps by not having more time or not have a larger budget, but major points are virtually identical.What he wants us to show Aronofsky is death as way to create life, death is not a nothing but a whole, that as stated in religion, dust you are and powder you convertirás, and that the fact of eternal life does but anything other than the final acceptance of the cycle which means life. And all accompanied by the hypnotic and beautiful music by Clint Mansell returns to fill life images of the director, as did it in his previous films, this time adhering to a more intimate and delicate style as requested by the film.We could give rise to many interpretations and debates on the film, but I do not gutting too before that you see, and perhaps that is why this criticism sounds something cryptic. I am sure that it will have its detractors and admirers, be those movies that either you love or you hate, but it will not leave indifferent anybody.
2,664
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3703
Andrés
Uno, dos, tres
5
5
muchocine
A comedy with frenetic pace, almost choreographic performances and cyclical jokes. Wilder was mocking the rigidity of the Russians and the maniac ambition of the gringos, but the first leave worse unemployed.
Received coldly by the public that the previous year had enjoyed a masterpiece, "The Apartment", "One, Two, Three" is a comedy film at full speed staged in the heart of the cold war, Berlin. Wilder had already spoofed the friction between Yankee and Communists in his early work as a screenwriter. In this film we have an officer from the Coca Cola in Berlin West, MacNamara, which receives commissioned to monitor the daughter of the Chief holiday for that city. The disobedient Scarlett goes to look for boyfriend to the red side, and reappears with a mozalbete respondón and versed in Marx. MacNamara sees jeopardized his position and moves his influences that they taken the boy. When the matter appears resolved, Scarlett Announces oh, horror!, is pregnant Communist. The Executive leaves to rescue the boy to marry Scarlett and, incidentally, put it "presentable" form and content. A comedy with frenetic pace, almost choreographic performances and cyclical jokes. Wilder was mocking the rigidity of the Russians and the maniac ambition of the gringos, but the first leave worse unemployed. Russians succumb to the tingling of consumerism.Sadly, the time gave him the reason.
2,665
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1364
Yojimbo
El funeral del jefe
3
5
muchocine
This film could frame her or grouped into those who play with a surreal screenplay and have fun at the border of the joke.
Credits and featured Donald Sutherland among a lot of Chinese names that you do not recognize? And the film is entitled "The funeral of the head"?You're still looking to see what it is.Then follows a sequence of a laboring, but it is a shooting. And see Donald who is the director: are in Beijing during a shoot. But he feels empty, disappointed and depressed because he has failed to do anything decent in what takes of filming. Filming is delaying and producer decides to withdraw to Donald and bring to another but maintaining the first in the opening credits as claim, something what Sutherland (from now Tyler) refuses. And in the midst of all this problem, veteran director befriends the camera is doing the "making of"(Yo-Yo) just before suffering a heart attack.The last words of the filmmaker are: want a comical funeral.From there begins the surrealism. Tyler is a great director who is diagnosed to die soon, but want a great show in his death.From there reveals the talent for advertising and business I-Yo.Y of all the paraphernalia that is mounted from that event.This film could frame her or grouped into those who play with a surreal screenplay and have fun at the border of the ridiculous (in this case without crossing it). It could be sold in pack with "Strange coincidences" (absolute hodgepodge) and "Anonymous". Very interesting to see except for some time lacking in pace and some very stretched situation.But we can not forget something: this is a Chinese film. An interesting Chinese experiment.
2,666
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1089
Jose Contreras
María Antonieta
2
5
muchocine
His greatest drama was that, initially, it could not have children; the King had problems in bed. As I read, frenillo, according to the film, an incomprehensible stupidity.
I have read that Kubrick had a modern soundtrack composed for his Space Odyssey. Then he thought and chose what we know, with classical music. He got was a futuristic feeling of classic work. Sofia Coppola has done the reverse. He carefully recreates the France of Louis XVI, but music is today. New Order, Air, The Strokes get closer to the essentials, what was the protagonist. Coppola did not want to talk about a dead Queen long, but a living woman.The Austrian heir her married the Dauphin of France at age 15. His greatest drama was that, initially, it could not have children; the King had problems in bed. As I read, frenillo, according to the film, an incomprehensible stupidity. If not given an heir to the French, the role of the protagonist in the Court stumbles. His relationship with the lover of his father-in-law, King Louis XV, Madame Du Barry, is contempt; the rest of the courtly life nor the wonder. The blood and the abolengos spread with morbid thoroughness honors serving things that she prefers to do alone. In the absence of marital life, the young Austrian surrenders to the game, luxury, fashion, wigs, jewelry, and pastries. Tradition speaks of Marie Antoinette as the pitiless Queen who lives with its back to the suffering of its people, Sofia Copola escarba in the human being behind the legend.One comprises the person. But a film is not as easy to fill. The heroine dramas do not give to much film. The tension over whether the King consumará or not to end his marriage did not to fill the film. I like the end, this farewell. but not at the price of endure all the time that comes forward.
2,667
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2159
JLO
Atrápame si puedes
3
5
muchocine
A round, pleasant, film with ambiguous end and a mild taste a little - with a small wink to Forrest Gump in the middle and all-. Spielberg is to much, much more. Fast digestion and an oversight at the same pace.
Spielberg promptly delivers us what it promises, always. Movies/Fables with reminiscences of his own childhood, full of fantasy and rhythm, agile, not exempt of the customary moral and also, it cannot be perfect, late reloaded to the best Disney way. After two more serious attempts and kubrickianos A.I. and SMinority Report, with the same faults and features described above, we have a comedy of light tone, Yes, but finally achieved one production lower in the Filmography of a director who becomes a more serious tone to let us see his best film, such as the splendid the Empire of the Sun and Schindler's listtwo of his finest works. This comedy-drama - more the former than the latter - begins to the family of Frank Jr., from rich to poor in one second, loading with the separation of their parents (analogy with the director himself) and the difficult decision to opt for one or the other. The only way out seems to be the flight and take various personalities - pilot, doctor, lawyer - forging checks by four million dollars and try to avoid, as far as possible, the emotional problems, as it is made clear by the encounters poachers with his father (a this time only correct Christhoper Walken). All sustained under the well-known label of based on a true story, adaptation of a book of the 80' of the real Abagnale, fraudster sentenced by the FBI and now become star. The characters are expensive in the style of the director, queribles beings, both the con man Frank Abagnale jr. (Leonardo Di Caprio) as detective who pursues Carl Hanratty (a numb Tom Hanks). This "overrides" the paternal relationship of the protagonist, reaching the limit of needing him despite their differences in repeated Christmas calls. Both catch me if you can as gangs of New York confirms the sudden maturity of Di Caprio, becoming already a good dramatic actor but it would be just stress, already good previous work and who loves Gilbert Grape?, reunion, Celebrity and even in the ill-fated Titanic. A round, pleasant, film with ambiguous end and a mild taste a little - with a small wink to Forrest Gump in the middle and all-. Spielberg is to much, much more. Fast digestion and an oversight at the same pace.
2,668
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3922
Andrés Pons
This is England
5
5
muchocine
Between decay shows the drama of beings lost in a very sad story really full of bitterness with a final open to hope.
I always think that our country is that of the blind in the cinematographic field, not term I explain the because British director SHANE MEADOWS recognized in half the world by their enormous talent, therefore here either premiere their films.His previous work DEAD MAN SHOES could catalogue you small wonder and a reflection on the revenge with a load of portentosa violence.Down much tone although it's certainly remains true to his style of extreme hardness comes his first premiere at our lares with the name THIS IS ENGLAND with rather poor distribution as expected.The issue is not novel focusing on SKINHEADS or also called shorn heads, addressed on several occasions by film as break STROPER, Clockwork Orange, HOOLIGANS and many more examples of gang members or youth bands that always gave lot of game.Between this narrative style mixing it with the social drama English relates us brilliantly without sutilizas a descent into hell by a young ignored in society that only receives the love of these criminals.Between decay shows the drama of beings lost in a very sad story really full of bitterness with a final open to hope.Interpretations of the Prodigy THOMAS TURGOOSE seen in the series innocent project and STEPHEN Graham in the same series is also seen in GOAL are really portentous giving credibility at all times to the drama that require their characters.Photography, music, script are practically outstanding giving us a devastating set you unfortunately will not have much significance in our lares.
2,669
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2337
Oscar Cantero
Días de cine
1
5
muchocine
A powerful argument for those who criticize the subsidized, subsidized and decadent contemporary Spanish cinema.
To many times I do with little faith, I am still of those who try to defend Spanish Cinema of reproof criticisms that normally receives by people that do not even bother to see films before flaying them. Say with little faith, or none, because there are cases in which the task of finding the positive side becomes quite uphill. And believe me when I say that before us today is a clear example of this.Days of the cinema is an aberration that aims to parody the Spanish uncover-era film, and you do through a miscellany of characters which are a copy of brazen, disrespectful and zafia in some of the actual past artistic icons, to which little or nothing have tried to modify in order to avoid a mockery at the end is not offensive because precisely this film isn't more than that which is determined in criticize. A script without wit, blunt dialogues, characters defined with bad taste and little imagination are the dominant notes in this crappy lighting in the light of some of these magnificent grants that the filmmakers in this country charge again of the State, and that it makes them unique workers need not do its work well to collect in a magnificent way. In an era in which the market sends, in which writers, singers, restaurateurs and vendors are subject to the acceptance of the public, these artists do not need the approval of the respectable, because even the private broadcasters are obliged to subsidize them and pay them huge amounts, but not worthy them of his work, which is in many occasions, like this one, shameful.This is noted in the little care has been taken in this production with the details, and that on one occasion even sees the reflection of a microphone in a bar. Although undoubtedly the most flagrant negligence occurs when in one of the scenes the protagonists will walking down a hallway and spend a few posters that advertise a bullfight of José Tomás, El Spain and Finito de Córdoba, who in 1977 (time in which the movie is set), they were children of chest or they were not even born.I don't want to lose or lose more time talking about this garbage, which should have felt embarrassed at having participated Fernando Tejero, Alberto San Juan and Miguel Rellán, actors with a name and a path to their backs.Maybe if buying more to develop quality scripts and less to be in the door of the Congress, in demonstrations, by signing manifest anti PP and appearing in political rallies, Spanish film wouldn't, according to the CIS itself, one of the least appreciated by the citizens of this country.
2,670
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4029
Tito Chinchan
Despedida de soltero
3
5
muchocine
Film about a couple of boyfriends, where she is to marry as soon as possible and he go to seek his fortune in the Americas. Given that it is very outdated, and that actors are not for nothing, see it now predicts boring.
Director: Eugenio Martín. duration: hour and a quarter.Release date: November 27, 1961.Espectadores: 69 of human beings, it seems that lockers control was more than necessary. That I said that if the Ministry does not have the data, to not put it, right? I if that is a number guarrindongo.In the world of the Spanish cinema classics, we have films that after the passage of the years become endearing, which they remain in existence and some to tráfago the years have devoured. This, unfortunately, is closer to the latter. To begin with, the theme go to the Americas to seek his fortune we have lejanísimo (now come them). Women no longer want to marry sole purpose in life. The only thing that remains is complex that is to buy a flat. A penalty.The film is about a couple of boyfriends in the 1960s. She animated in excess by his aunt, is wants to marry when previously. On the other hand, he encouraged by her uncle wants to go to the Americas to seek his fortune, to then go and marry. All this ends it tangle the arrival of a President of a South American country.Because I have much more to add. Almost remains is film as an anecdote of the funny dramatic film Spanish, given that now see is rare. Curiosities is to see the Spain of the early 1960s, their customs and others, but little else. The performances are even outdated, with a girlfriend which I think you do quite loose. As a curiosity, it has two moments that clearly which put people to make the scenes her shit. The two on the beach, with horses, which actors returning back from a jump, and another with the car. NA, to say the least.In short, film about a couple of boyfriends, where she is to marry as soon as possible and he go to seek his fortune in the Americas. Given that it is very outdated, and that actors are not for nothing, see it now predicts boring.Besitos.P.D: Has a couple of funny comic moments, but little else.Pd2: The only reason why I saw is that get Pepe Isbert
2,671
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1741
Ramón Balcells
El caso Slevin
3
5
muchocine
I highlighted among this multitude of classics of the thriller due to its interesting outcome. One movie more than correct with an intelligent script and cast of authentic luxury.
Only in the usual suspects, that masterpiece of Bryan Singer, has managed to catch the viewer in its final stretch. Perhaps as commercial films as basic instinct or the sixth sense also did at the time, but it is clear that the Singer film was, and will remain, the thriller with the best surprise of the story ending. Among so many and such varied films of intrigue that have aired over the years, it would not bad stress, positively, the second work of Paul McGuigan, entitled the Slevin.Y case precisely what I highlighted among this multitude of classic because of gender, especially to its interesting outcome. You don't have the same ingenuity than the others, possibly because the others already exist and it has built a tad in them, but there is no doubt that the film you tricks until the end. Apparently, the film seems to be an entertaining thriller of action with comic touches without too much spark. This appearance is transformed into something totally positive and the result is, as mentioned, an interesting and ingenious thriller that does not disappoint in its final stretch, but it rather surprised.But, above all, the script of the Slevin case is somewhat irregular: its inception is incredible, as well as the outcome, but the crux of the story, or the part intermediate, decreases relatively, presented some another downturn and meaningless dialogues. But then, this small depression that suffers from the film, is recovered by a turn (perhaps somewhat excessive), which did not disappoint anyone.It would also be necessary to highlight the incredible cast after their argument. Perhaps the protagonist is it worse (Josh Hartnett without too much spark, although not entirely unbearable). But I must admit that the rest of performers are a few authentic cracks. From a great Bruce Willis (as usual), Morgan Freeman in State of grace (as always) to Ben Kingsley playing, in a peculiar way, a Rabbi without scruples. And the side include the Eastern beauty in person, Lucy Liu, in a totally curious role, Stanley Tucci, portraying the police investigating the case and Danny Aiello, which always makes interesting roles, although here, unfortunately, do not remember or to what role belonged.Within the technical aspects I would highlight its modern photography (careful with angles really claustrophobic fixed levels) and witty and almost perfect Assembly. It is not bad music, although not noted for high.In short, one film more than correct with an intelligent script and cast of authentic luxury, but some have other failure on the intensity of the story.
2,672
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1789
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Diario de un escándalo
4
5
muchocine
It is not melodrama and not a thriller, but he opts for spinning a very entertaining and honest exercise of sociological research of neutral analysis that rummages the sins of a broken society, pushed to forgive with interests, to be convinced of the lightness of certain offences to not spoil the exemplary calm of its appearance.
This modern Vampire Chronicle, based in an aseptic London, obvious Gothic component to the use and the romanticism of book, but portrays the same pathologies: what is radically different is the dress that evil is presented to us. Here occurs in broad daylight and does not require a single drop of blood food contest. The subject matter of suction is the entire personality and exercise it a teacher about to retire, harmless in appearance, cultured and crudely acid in the observations that records in his diaries on other newly attached to a faculty Professor mona, young and, in principle, easily inducible absolute manipulation pleasure.Diary of a scandal progresses slowly but afianzadamente on some sensitive budgets which, in other hands, with other view, had been able to engender a vulgar telefilm of shrill invoice with abundant evidence of reality show in its stark footage.Attending a prontuario frivolous on education in the 21st century, we can say that the film is a reflection of the light morality that fills us with: how instincts are the engines of our actions, although in this case the young idealist and bobalicona (sober Cate Blanchett) never seem bad at all, despite having contributed with his consent to a fifteen year old girl is her trajine with repeated insistence on an ardent here you rogue-here you kill.The sentimental blackmail the old teacher puts on the new leads every interest of the film: the troubled loneliness of the teacher slightly lesbian excited with the possibility of enslave the will of his chantajeada enables breakthrough agile in the history, no melodramatic, burdened for an interesting but in the end very heavy voice-over from the embracing storyteller of the plot, the vamp, the happy demiurge of the tragedy that his perversion has created. Judi Dench magistral recreates with astonishing naturalness a hateful, ambiguous, evil by nature, surprised character on the final slope of his life with intact Hymen and the nasty settled in that murderous look drag during much of the film.The intensity of the psychological drama open no lapses in no time: raises discussions of broad social significance as sexual intercourse with minors or the sordid consent of those who for one reason or another to take advantage of this dysfunction.The few scruples of the young professor to be activity by the boy are not less scandalous that interested permissiveness of the teacher aware of desmon, who plays his cards with premeditation, conscious always that the game is written by her and she establishes rules, actants and up the length. There is a particularly significant scene: Barbara, is the name of the character that plays gloriously, as we have said, Judi Dench, sits on the stairs of the House inevitably English where the tragedy has joined the mother of the newborn pervert student: this goes to give him a beating to induce Professor. The spectacle is sublime in the eyes of who has caligrafiado all the letters of the work.These notable evidence of good cinema and great history are lost when the film announces their twisted end, his resignation to be sincere with itself, because that gives us, in payment for more than one hour of attractive arguments, is a triumphant end, where everything is left to lead to meekness of forgiveness and where all the characters recoverbenefit of armchair, the tranquility and inner peace from which began.At the end we have the grey portrait of a dark, perfidious wife in his inaceptada solitude or perhaps truly remarkable is the ease with which we shed the closest important crimes if in indifference we acquired some benefit, a comfortable chair where the devastated an excessively overload the shocking society silences contemplate the ruins of morality. And also another equally depressing portrait: of the dysfunctional family (nothing to envy to the members of the little Miss Sunshine van psicotrónicos) Sheba, young teacher, which could be built, with due dramatic refinement, a more than solid script of Puya and apparent bourgeois júbilos the sabrosón rhythm of a calypso after lunch with pink hamgurguesas.
2,673
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3543
Iñaki Bilbao
Las vampiras
2
5
muchocine
Poor Spanish, considered cult film out there.
"A real estate agent has strange dreams where it appears a very attractive young woman who lives in a faraway island". Go to the psychiatrist, who tells him that he needs a vacation. So he moved to this island where, effectively, live girl with dream, Nadine, an aristocratic descendant of Count Dracula. A passionate relationship is established between the two motivated because it is the girl of the island of a vampire, who is transformed to the girl in one like her. But her boyfriend and psychiatrist will try to save her.Although considered cult in some sectors, it is indeed a boring and inconsistent film, happily directed, that Yes, Jesus Franco, very nice patriotic director but excessively overvalued.Here are based on a good idea, but their development is a difficult to bear lead. Slow and infuriating, in addition to fairly ridiculous, only highlights its art direction, something that always has been commitment good Jesus. Moreover, quite boring and tedious, but made with a good aesthetic taste, I repeat. I do not think much, the truth.
2,674
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1699
Daniel Galindo
300
3
5
muchocine
This unique digital effects with alleged historical background binge opens again the eternal dilemma raised by film adaptations.
An adaptation was never so true, although on the other hand, we do not agree on whether a film and the book on which it is based (or play) should or not to share something more than its essence and plotlines Basic. 300 is the story turned into legend and taken to the extreme. The battle of Thermopylae and the truth about Greeks and Persians, or rather, the truth according to Frank Miller who has finished taking body in an audiovisual binge that represents a turning point in the epic, pulling to the fantastic cinema. Little to do with Alexander the great, Gladiator, Troy, etc. with fringes of the battles of the Lord of the rings, but we refuse to establish parallels in the end lastren the objective that we want: applaud the audacity to bet on a genus and a few different ways. We are not surprised find schematic interpretations at the service of the aesthetic enjoyment, exaggerated largely, although faithful to the spirit and the content of the graphic novel. Good ones, which are few, they face the evil and horrendous, and war stories despite sublime moments with an introduction where mingle metaphor, myth and cinema excitement without the parade of muscular and bloody gross that takes place during the 90 minutes of footage.This duration is appreciated because as well not just being monotone narration. He is supported, especially if one is regular reader of graphic novel, as Sin City and V for vendetta, it goes to the movies with open mind willing to contemplate how risks or (suicide) a quasi-Rookie, that only highlights the Filmography of the director dawn of the dead. The magnitude of the project could apabullar more than one but the belief to do feet that he was not inspired, but that it commemorated the self-titled comic, convinced him that he should flee from all prejudice.The film has many readings, some impregnated with a marking dye ideological antimilitarist and antitodo. Do but not go out there: far from be carried away by critics who accuse the racist film? by the monstrous portrait of the Persians - and be full of clichés? that is, and many - I advise you that it penetrated in this remarkable recreation retail reflected on the role that, as audiovisual narrative, works and entertains.
2,675
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1614
Tito Chinchan
The host
1
5
muchocine
Abominable creation which is called movie only be broadcast in movie theaters. It empatiza more with the monster with the cast of actors that give penalty in a film that does not know if it is a parody of itself bad that is. Go to piss and no echar gota.
"The first shark, then Alien and now The Host." Very daring of the poster have seemed me to me. I I would have opted for "first Deep Blue See, later Karate to death in Torremolinos and now The Host". Basically the first were serious films, and this do not know if is laughable, if it is weeping (penalty is, if), if it is action or what noses is.The film is a crazy and very bad scientist makes a spill of something evil to a river. Total, that past age comes a tremendous bicharraco dedicated to eating people on the side of it. In these eats to the daughter of a fool dyed blond that runs a fast food stand next to his father. So I have to find silly, the father, a brother and a sister Briana. Well, and the army which puts them in quarantine but all go through the Arch of the mine Triunfo.Madre piece of truño, unbearable. Not understood if it is serious or not. For starters, the monster is fine, but is not topped (at a technical level). Then the human characters are tristísimos, bad acting and the pathetic role. The protagonist gives up even disgust. The argument is infumable and abhorrent, only can be save as movie monsters like Godzilla (cardboard) the first minutes. After the funeral (have no adjectives) this becomes an escalation of bobochorreces flowing into the lighting of the cauldron final. Insufrible.Resumiendo, abominable creation which is called movie only be broadcast in movie theaters. It empatiza more with the monster with the cast of actors that give penalty in a film that does not know if it is a parody of itself bad that is. Go to piss and no echar gota.
2,676
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2987
Jose Contreras
Os declaro marido y marido
1
5
muchocine
The flag can not be removed gay and four slogans of fashion on sexual freedom in the midst of a product whose humor is to flatter the male chauvinist instincts of the less demanding public.
It is not surprising that homosexuals held a gay pride day since the heteros are celebrating the other 364. The boys proclaims his happiness be boys in the half of the jokes that makes, and, until recently, in their institutions. The idea that all possible couples have the right to join in holy marriage is as serious as the idea that all soldiers are entitled to an award but not to go to war. However, gays defend it tooth and nail, and in Spain, Canada, Belgium, South Africa or Netherlands her have conquered. Defend things as this part, according to some, of modernity. Why roll films to look modern. But they are not, the speckles of dandruff falling everywhere.John Ford seems an unusual case. Ethan Edwards is not a citizen outraged against the racism of his country, is the own Ford trying to wash their dirty laundry in public. Why is us more authentic when he shoots in the eyes of a dead Indian and denied entry into heaven than just when accepting her niece. The criticism of racism us is authentic because it comes from a racist.A similar mess, but at level chavacano, that became the creators of "I declare you husband and husband" with the world of homophobia. Adam Sandler is a firefighter as friend of his friend who is willing to marry him to secure the pension of their children. The problem of Sandler is that he is not gay, but more out of the world man. Something like Andrés Pajares in Hollywood. Instead of showing his testosterone desmadre with Adriana Vega, Nadiuska or Susana Estrada, Sandler has Jessica Biel. The endless scene where Jessica Biel lets you touch her tits thinking that he is gay and he wallows in front of the audience that knows that he is not gay is without a doubt one of the conditions put Adam Sandler in the contract to produce the film. Lack of inspiration, the idea of Alonso Millán sentences in "Will not want the neighbor of the fifth".It is not only that the film has no grace, which has little; the problem is not clear to whom it is addressed. The flag can not be removed gay and four slogans of fashion on sexual freedom in the midst of a product whose humor is to flatter the male chauvinist instincts of the less demanding public.
2,677
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/484
Oscar Cantero
La increíble historia de Caperucita Roja
3
5
muchocine
I dislike to see the name of little Red Riding Hood in the title of a film that ends up being suspected, along with his grandmother and the Wolf of a robbery, and investigated by the police.
I have not described to the incredible but true story of little Red Riding Hood as a bad film, because it is not. The characters are beautifully designed, are entertaining and it even has some moments able to emerge, the less, an outline of smile on the face of the majority. The dubbing are fun and that they cannot help compare and checking Schreck backup for any animated film in which animals appear, let me remind you that the Brothers Grimm published the story of Red Riding Hood and the Wolf in the first quarter of the nineteenth century, which seems to me that is something before the Nice green monster out of the laboratories of the Pixar Animation Studios. But what they want to tell you, maybe it's because I'm too sentimental, but I don't like that a tale of the all the life reinventen it changing all, or almost, the characteristics of the characters, so rooted in tens of generations that we have grown up listening to the voice of our relatives. And that's why I do dislike to see the name of little Red Riding Hood in the title of a film that ends up being suspected, along with his grandmother and the Wolf of a robbery, and investigated by the police. Even without a story to which it can be called pedagogical being the original, this version snatches the innocence to the story. Anyway, I do not want to break excessively from the object of these lines, which is none other than the value the artistic quality of the film, independent of any moral or ethical considerations... And in that aspect, as I said at the beginning, the incredible but true story of little Red Riding Hood, is not bad.
2,678
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3908
Bruji
Mimzy, más allá de la imaginación
3
5
muchocine
A bet brave by traditional toys in full era of video games.
New Line Cinema, producer of sagas multi-million dollar as 'The Lord of the Rings' or 'The Golden Compass', performs a brave defense of traditional toys to video games in this lesser title, which has one of its directors after the cameras.One of the advantages of being the director of New Line Cinema and have become a distributor in one of the most influential producers of the industry should be to get back - if you fancy - to the origins of unknown filmmaker to take the lead in a product that not succeed at the box office. Little matter that infuriating linearity which dealt with the realization, translated the invention in an irregular Court film with too many valleys and transmit any culminating peak which demonstrate the lack of that invaluable virtue which, in cinema, is the ability of knowing. Little to the four writers hired (for lack of one) to achieve, with greater or lesser success (in this case, none), shine on the adaptation of a short story of the marriage formed by Henry Cuttner and C.L. Moore. Little, because the head is up allows license look with the technical virguería that does reflect the drawings of "mandalas" of the young Wilder in glasses of his astonished Professor of science. Not with the originality with which Alfred Hitchcock shot one of the scenes peaks of strangers on a train, taking the image through similar crystals; feat later repeated by Pedro Almodóvar in women.., but, rather, the result of one of these coincidences, called "serendípitys", derived from the mere question based on basic principles of physical, easy to reach by the worst amateur video recording his girlfriend with sunglasses placed. History, interesting approach and multiple possibilities, makes the mistake of placing different and too many assumptions on the table with the clear intention not to develop any of them, causing an amalgam of concepts and specific auxiliary sub-plots than anything they bring to the central axis of the argument or it should be present in the final resolution. At times, comparable to the legendary Lewis Carroll's Alice, recurring resource where there. At times, as lost as the protagonist of Artificial Intelligence in the presence of the blue fairy. Without forgetting the worms that connect temporary gates, in clear reference to stories like Stargate or Timeline. And, ultimately, replacing beings of other spatial realities for futuristic gadgets, close to the Superman that "invoicing" only possibility of survival, or ET Spielbergriano which must return to their home after a risky huída; the director is not resisting the temptation to incorporate these two "new" techniques of contemporary cinema: the famous voices in off with telepathic excuse and imperceptible flashback that justifies the development of the action. Nor to the idea to exploit the clumsy and few special effects to adapt them to the minimum requirements of the script. However, the greater nonsense of all would be the attempt to discuss this film from a unique point of view, the film and strictly formal. Why not be lost in the wonderful world of funds that enclose well-intentioned messages?. Why not admit the possibility that all of the footage is not more than the metaphor to vindicate the importance of traditional toys, even more useless, in full era of video games?. Retomemos thread and type on a trip in the time, to reach a pure feeling coated DNA. What until that part of the past where is located our own childhood? At that time, we knew that not everything what is found abandoned on the street must be potentially hazardous, and occur to me the harmless board game called Jumanji and the curious box of Hellraiser. No. There was still the alternative of finding surprising objects, dear treasures that "inexplicable" and consistently ended in the trash. Mothers only saw wooden planks, pumpkins and paperweights in what were Pirate ships, smiling caritas and generating magical. nobody wanted to imitate the hostesses of the one, two, three and caused a power outage while he extracted a piece of the pattern of lights being on the panel of the auction? And when the present is represented by these glass dwellings that kidnap virtual pets subject to the dictates of its creators, the potential of the multipurpose plush toys of yesteryear were unlimited: protective amulets, children and students, powerful sleeping pills, monsters that aterraban the village of the barriguitas, comfortable armchairs... that Yes, with an unintelligible language that only we knew to decipher. In a mediocre Division, among which are the correct interpretations of Timothy Hutton, Joely Richardson (glow in the dark), giving life to a bland and stereotypical characters that blur without remission, we are witnessing the birth of a star name Rhiannon Leigh Wriyn; the girl's innate purity, which bears the weight of the fabric. And, paraphrasing the Broadman agent at that time that "I do not understand anything, but I'm glad," I admit I would like nothing more than have succeeded in starting a nostalgic smile in the movie buff reader with this vision of the film. If not I got, it will be because I myself lost fantasy in a steep bend of life.
2,679
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1425
Caruco
Noche en el museo
2
5
muchocine
Moderately meets its objectives, including smiles, even leaves us a flavor similar to the titles is made in the 80's.
If someone expects a solid or committed food, this is not his film. It is a comedy American, with many Visual effects, protagonidada by Ben Stiller, and aimed at the family audience. No more surprises than the check which is the level of special effects, if Ben Stiller, accompanied by his inseparable Owen Wilson, suffer the evil of the comedian with "tiresome" grimaces or see if it achieves to boot, at least some smile.Try to give what offers, in generous doses and perhaps too commissioning children look. But it contains the added lure of running into us with a particularísmo formed trio of thugs no less than by Dick Van Dyke ("Mary Poppins"), 80 years! behind him, and made a kid, even scoring a few passes of dance; Billy Cobbs (secondary luxury in titles as "Cotton club" or "The color of money"), 70 years, and the small great Mickey Rooney, nothing less than 85 years!, and made a grumpy's more sympathetic.They are not the only actors "resurrected" for the occasion. We also have a Robin Williams (overcome their problems with alcohol), in plan beloved colleague, that embodies, and never better said, to the figure of Theodore Roosevelt.Aventuras at the great Museum.The invention allows paraded before our eyes all sorts of historical figures, including a Columbus speaking on Genoese, Pharaohs and ordas, barbarians, Romans, jeans, Maya and Neanderthal men. And other animal species more sympathetic or dangerous from a thug mono cappuccino, until tiranosauros-rex, Lions, Mammoths or reptiles.This is the fauna that inhabits the vast Museum of Natural history in New York, with allowing to set up that premise, or feeling, passing there one night must be disturbing, especially if some of the objects starts to come alive.The Mise en scène by Shawn Levy ("the Pink Panther") is as functional as effective trying to both the script and the star of Ben Stiller reluzcan without squeaking and the accumulation of so many effects not getting tired, too.Moderately meets its objectives, including smiles, and even leaves us a taste, but not the same greatness, similar to the adventure and fantasy titles were made in the 1980s. Not in vain Chris Columbus, screenwriter of "Gremlins", "The secret of the pyramid" or "The goonies", and director of "Adventures in the big city" or "Solo at home" (1991), is after the production.Otherwise take Ben Stiller become a father of family and man, failed, without work stable, divorced and with a boy who longs to admire his father. And which, together with Federico Luppi, eventually finding their "place in the world," in the most incredible way and incidentally, to make all round, also in a guide of the Museum of very good looking (Carla Gugino).
2,680
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1890
Iñaki Bilbao
Shooter: El Tirador
2
5
muchocine
Allegedly critical against the system and, in reality, tendentious and devious.
Entertaining action film, albeit a great fantasmada. To pass the time by seeing it must forget any hint of plausibility in the diverse and rather ridiculous events that are happening without more nor more, than rather hastily and lengthening the film to unfortunate ends. It begins well, with a good prologue and until the first half-hour action holds thanks to a flexible mounting. However, shortly after they begin the inconsistencies, tomaduras of hair (the way in which take out you the bullet and he himself heals, until that time, the wounds.), and the dialogues become ridiculous.Everything is nonsense and is derived to dangerous even in its fund approaches, to be untargeted alleged Puya to incorrect actions of the Government of the United States, as when we say that "Yes, it is true, as there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.".But in the end it is discovered that when the law fails, by its legal system, be done justice by own hand, Justice derived towards the murder, even if it is the bad bad function. Something disgusting indicating well clearly the true intentions which houses the film.Devious and pendencioso over not being able, though narrated effectively by Fuqua, whose film career going at high speed grounding of video club, if he does not walk with care.Finally, you can spend the time watching this bullshit where the good do not fail a single shot and them already can pull you up missiles, that is hardly inmutan, but is tendentious and ends in a rather embarrassing way, with an epilogue of night court.
2,681
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/116
Angeles Val
Zathura
4
5
muchocine
A delight of film for children
ZATHURA, against much criticism pseudo-intelectualoide arrogant circulating out there, found me a wonderful film logradísima, both for children and for adults who are still able to enjoy an adventure full of imagination, well told, with a great deal of good special effects, humor, surprises and tenderness and, above all, enjoyablewithout decay at any time. Some lovers of art and essay or animation manga for kids tildarán of corny the message of Fund on good relations between brothers (or any of our peers), but my find me added value in the midst of so much gratuitous violence that surrounds the smaller lately and that brings them so little.Fantastic and charming design of the gameboard. Flying the House reminds me of the nostalgic film "The wizard of Oz" that was once an ode to imagination and dreams. It highlights the good performance of the kids, and I dare to assure that many kids will be identified with a multitude of scenes! There is a fun balance between laughter and scares.In short, genuine critics here are children, and just need to listen to their enthusiastic comments when it ends the film. Don't miss out of the cinema the faces and words of the kids who have close. Surely they will be surprised.
2,682
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3832
Javier Martínez
El acorazado Potemkin
5
5
muchocine
It never said so much in so little time behind a camera. A catharsis continuous based on frames.
I do not know if it is thing of spontaneous generation or a specific alignment of the planets, but the fact is that in a particular territory is turned on a spark and they begin to sprout geniuses. The great Greek list (Sócrates-Platón - Aristóteles), del Siglo de Oro Spanish or the Renaissance are the most significant examples. Probably the last great boom occurred in Russia between mid-19th century and early 20th. The list is long and includes all Arts: Tolstoy Dostoievski, Chejov, Stanislavski, Mayakovsky, Kandinsky, Turgenev, Gorky, Vertov, Pudovkin, Nijinsky, Pasternak, curious verify that it matches the most turbulent era in the country, as well said Orson Welles on "The third man" and published Socioapatía ago poco:http://socioapatia.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/posters-polacos-de-cine/De between them appears Sergei Eisenstein, disciple of another theatrical genius (Meyerhold) and that would change forever the structure of the film. He and Griffith we owe them the epic blockbusters and have become to the seventh art rather than entertainment. You don't have to be communist to enjoy with this movie. In fact, even the Goebbels himself admired it. That Yes, we must warn that it was commissioned by the dome of the Bolshevik Party (with recently deceased Lenin), who is extremely partisan and even distorts the true facts of the popular revolts of 1905. Eisenstein was the "Leni Riefenstahl" red, although it ended (does and who does not?) in the sights of Comrade side Stalin.Dejando these trifles I have rather than kneel before what this man did in 1925. Well, he and the great Eduard Tissé on the picture. Convert to a crowd in a film possibly is crazy, sweet folly that elevates this work to the category of immortal. I do not think that there is an only critic that does not include her in your list of favorites. There is only a character with their own name, Vakulinchuk, incarnation of the courage and suffering of the people in a person, very of taste Soviet under the amount of iconography of Heads of State that they produced (and later destroyed). From the meat agusanada until the twinning with the fleet of the army everything are shock effect, a continuous catharsis to base frames. The panoramic and foregrounds are happening while the music guide emotions. And there are of all colors: indignation, rage, hope, joy, bitterness, terror. All this will be parading in front of the eyes, which surrenders. I have already said it before but it can not be forgotten; not only Eisenstein is the magician, what makes Eduard Tissé with the picture is out of reach for anyone. Impossible angles of the battleship, the penumbra of the ship at dusk, multiple approaches to the persecution by the stairs of Odessa, the burial of Vakulinchuk, colossal close-up as the of the mother, the falling roof, the barrel pointing at the camera, crucifix and course, if you like the things related to the technique of cinemaThis is your movie.And as Colophon makes my favorite scene of all time, the massacre of Cossacks to the population of Odessa when it welcomed the mutineers and said goodbye with honors the fallen hero. The mother, the chariot of the baby, the lame, the aligned passage of the Cossacks and thousand more scenes take place in just a few frantic minutes, minutes that contain the essence of what the film is, or what should be. It never said so much in so little time behind a camera.There was a time in which he wanted to be a filmmaker, and all this blame "The Battleship Potemkin". Anyway, I would need a million pages to tell everything that comes to mind when I think in this film, which is why I put end and that each one to see and draw their own conclusions. I attached the Odessa steps scene.
2,683
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2268
JLO
Maybe Baby
4
5
muchocine
A script simple and seamless for the unknown Ben Elton also surprising in the direction of his directorial debut.
The romantic comedy belonged since the beginning to the Yankee film. By both their own right and perform them very well, as if they had precise timming and the formula. When those comes to imitate are achieved mamotretos without life or identity. This is not the case.You know that in an English comedy you will find beforehand a personal style: good performances, leisurely pace and up some stiffness saved only at few times in recent years - four weddings and a funeral, Full monthly - to mention only two successful.But if as stated add you a couple acting with weight, efficient, more comical situations without using the coup low by the topic - infertility-, the use of gags "to the American" but without abusing's tenderloin with dramatic situations to the tone, we are faced with a successful film that without being any wonder, leaving the famous contemporary my great Greek wedding as child's play.A successful couple has everything but that most craves: a son. From there start a thousand attempts to solve the problem adding a sudden lock creative in Sam (Hugh Laurie of Stuart Little) a writer of television screenplays of little success and his girlfriend Platonic Love Lucy (the dreamer Joely Richardson of the Patriot, 101 Dalmatians) of a new coworker, the handsome Carl (James Purefoy of infidelity)all further complicating the original problem.Surround them side achieved as Tom Hollander as Ewan, a filmmaker released (almost a clone of Ben Stiller) and Roman Atkinson (Mr. Bean) as a hilarious gynecologist and freak. Also is Emma Thompson as a friend mystique of the couple'd in a character without grace and insubstantial.A script simple and seamless for the unknown Ben Elton also surprising in the direction of his directorial debut. In the must, some loose gag that adds nothing like the scene of dandruff of the protagonist, and the English and pedantic idea to put prepo and recited Shakespeare on either side. A collage of romance, melancholy, comedy and drama. So much or so little. To finish the review, detail of a horrible subject of Paul McCartney in the initial titles. Re-read Lennon, you forgive.
2,684
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2062
Patri
Thirteen
4
5
muchocine
The best, without doubt, interpretations of the 3 main characters.
Tracy is a girl of 13 years of Los Angeles that loses his innocence through the influence of the most popular girl in the Institute, introduced into a world of sex and drugs which makes it radically change of attitude towards his family. His mother, Mel, who is alcoholic, try desperately to understand and help.The screenplay for this film wrote it the Director along with Nikki Reed, the girl who plays Eve (the most popular of the Institute), and is based on what happened to her when she was 13 years old. This makes that the characters are very well built and very real.Although this truth also influence the interpretations of the actresses, Evan Rachel Wood is the protagonist, which undergoes a dramatic shift in a very short time, conveys very well the desperation that is below the layer of makeup and brazenness of Tracy; Holly Hunter is the mother of Tracy, is divorced and is alcoholic, although he is trying to leave it and in no time we see drunk; Nikki Reed plays the friend of Tracy. Eve has no parents, goes to live with her mother and Tracy and decisively influencing the lives of the two. It is a character unbalanced very well played by newcomer Nikki Reed, perhaps because lived the history very closely.The best, without doubt, interpretations of the 3 main characters.
2,685
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/225
Daniel Galindo
Cuando un extraño llama
2
5
muchocine
Being a trite story, with expressionless actors and poorly planned situations, the tape can be up entertaining
When you start the movie one has slight suspicion about where the shots can go. Through this introduction, banal by the insubstantial, is that if patent the tone of what is upon us, a new example of feature film helpings in the teen horror genre. Few dare to introduce changes where they perceive that a formula works: you change the scenario, you now to a character on the other, but you leave the disturbing atmosphere and scares, screams and races because of a psychopath with criminal instincts. Here there is a gas station in the middle of an inhospitable moorland or one College, but a luxurious mansion lost in the mountains; against the Group of young people with character type (snobs, stiffs, athletes, intellectuals) will impose a young woman with courage and determination? needed to sustain the film - that must save the lives of children who cares. In short, are the same patterns used nauseam but, as well as producers, then dan result at the box office. Everything has its explanation and which justifies the interest of Hollywood is in young people eager to suspense stories accompanied by a good Pack of popcorn and the groom or the bride well close.A Japanese horror title also was enough of the phone, in this case mobile, to announce the death of their protagonists. Missed call, which is the name the reference, plays with the same elements but reserved the letter of surprise, something that when you call a stranger is diluted as soon as the girl picks up the wireless two or three times. by the way, is mentioned already repetitive tone? On the other side of the line there is a serial killer who will be at the Gallery of murderers series because his modus operand is nothing special. And although they create just them gutting the film, not start cursing for free that they checked Simon West, its director-malabarista, makes it clear from the first sequence. Although us despite being a trite story, with expressionless actors and poorly planned situations, the tape may be up entertaining but only for those who enjoy the exponents of the B series and titles as Scream but warned: are not dealing with an incipient Wes Craven but talking about a title that offers more of the same and with more crime if it should be since it is based on the same premises recorded a tape of the 1970s. The producers of the current must be some of the few who saw it in his day. Taking advantage of forgetful which is our memory a script that, away from the blatant plagiarism, settlement otherwise worked.
2,686
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3740
Heitor Pan
Once
4
5
muchocine
This is a film, in short, that you will enjoy all over the world, but will be much more, for anyone that really enjoy the music, all that are able to simply sit down, close your eyes and listen to paladeada.
I am of those people who like to listen to a whole album. From time to time, you find an LP which has a meaning as it is made, whose order saves a logic and whole, heard from beginning to end, manages to convey a feeling, an idea, or a State of mind is not able to, say, a compilation album. Does not happen always, in fact, very few albums that I keep in my memory of this form, as a book, should that not be read a loose chapter since, if it did, it would lose much of its magic, but when it is one of these works, it is almost certain that you will save with zeal until that one is deaf and even more beyond.Watch the movie "Once", I had a similar feeling, rather than a film to use, is more a good disk to which you have been images so that you can follow more easily, or to complement those feelings that the music alone, is capable of touching but him harder to remove. One exercise that, in another form attempted to Disney in the incredible "fantasy", although at that time he tried to to the style of compilation albums. In this case, we have music filmed with soul, with a story that shocked, amused and thrilled in equal parts.The degree of emotion that manages to convey the film is directly proportional to the frankness with which is filmed and performed and this succeeds, largely thanks to the main actors, both musicians that had worked together on a disk. Glen Hansard and Markéta Irglová composed songs that serve as a thread that the argument goes sliding and offer a simple interpretation that manages to cause that we identify with what they are going from the first moment.The story is that of a street musician who performs known songs during the day and at night, sings his own compositions that revolve, almost all around a loving disappointment. One day he meets a saleswoman of flowers that stops to listen to a song and they begin a friendly relationship in which music will be its point of attachment.The film talks about music as an integral part of our lives in a very powerful way. The images of the guitar of the protagonist, old, broken, a guitar that has lived and suffered the songs coming out of their strings, or when she goes to practice with the piano at a music store, testing every day a different keyboard while the owner listen pleased, or in the recording of the album, when a sound technician who has seen too many bad groups is surprised with the quality of what you have ahead. Everything that happens, every change, every feeling comes forward by a beat changed.A film, in short, that you will enjoy worldwide for his friendly face, a story that leaves marked is this a smile on the face and an enviable soundtrack, but it will be much more, for anyone that really enjoy the music, all that are able to simply sit down, close your eyes and listen to paladeada.
2,687
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/553
Berto
Mi super ex novia
2
5
muchocine
A real shame, that a movie with a very good starting point, taking advantage of the huge amount of films about superheroes, is wasted in such a way.
Ivan Reitman had its moments of glory by the 1980s with these easy comedies that were so successful. Ghostbusters, dangerously together and the Twins hit two times were directed by him and had a more than acceptable success at the box office. Since then and except for 6 days, 7 nights and evolution, it hasn't have any drinking project between hands.It is a genuine shame, that a movie with a very good starting point, taking advantage of the huge amount of films about superheroes, is wasted in such a way, but above all and as always say usually be from the screenwriter of turn that stays in the easy joke and fails to go a little further. Who is never imagine how it would privacy both superhero? As ligaría Wonder Woman or Elektra? Because from here part the film, presenting us with a girl G, which would be the envy in any Marvel superhero powers, but that head the truth that this theme very bad. In addition, situations that develop in the film are totally naïve, on the basis of the way in which both are known, as the reasons why the protagonist leaves her. Luke Wilson is totally unbearable throughout the film, the roll that brings now I like now I dont want to is so poorly defined that makes very little credible to her character, besides the fact that it is not working the most minimum to give a bit of personality. Uma Thurman, great among the great, performs a salvageable normalito, only role by these ready savages of madness and jealousy that give from time to time and which are in terms of performance of the film the best of times. Anna Faris, star of the films Scary Movie this much for this to show off captivations and little more, more stereotyped she could not her character, stereotyped as the best friend of the protagonist, Rainn Wilson, as forgettable as the rest of the film. Separate chapter deserves Professor Beldam, Chica Némesis G and which could not be the copy more simplistic that a good Lex Luthor might have been, any bad of a Van Damme movie has more presence than this supervillain (lo super is a say?)The bad script nauseam, starting very well with the approach of mixing Fatal attraction with any superhero movie, is quickly reduced to a gracieta no sense in which the only thing interesting are notable special effects as regards powers of girl G. Ultimately, a pity the movie from a great idea has become a very simplistic comedy.
2,688
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/584
Jose Contreras
Azuloscurocasinegro
5
5
muchocine
The classic script for Hollywood knows that you just concentrate gunpowder at three key moments, the two turns of the first and second Act and the final. This oblivion can explain the box office, but does not take away an iota of value to a huge film.
With the large one has the feeling that their journeys are nothing more than an excuse, sometimes a distraction to take us to their land, to speak to us in a way, with a tone. To speak to the ear, as does Shyamalan, to confess before us, as he likes to Mankiewicz, to release your unbridled vein as Almodóvar, or to tell us things calmly, calmly, that is tone that runs throughout the film by Daniel Sánchez Arévalo. The vicissitudes, incredible at times, unexpected always, stop each character about to lose your temper, but it always ends in a more surprising than the previous play, and it assesses sober, sensible, serene.The film is built with a regular rhythm in Spanish film, which distributes the research over the footage. The classic script for Hollywood knows that you just concentrate gunpowder at three key moments, the two turns of the first and second Act and the final. This oblivion can explain the box office, but does not take away a bit of value to a huge film.George, the protagonist, take care of his invalid father, and with memory problems, leads the goal and tries to find work with his title of business that it has taken at the UNED. His brother is serving his sentence and falls in love for the first time in his life of another convicted. She needs to get pregnant to change flag. The friend of Jorge spy from the terrace of your building to a massage gay.While Hollywood makes heroes without any sign of fatigue, Spanish film never tires of cure to your audience. It heals your intransigence of its impropriety. AzulOscuroCasiNegro faces hot topics as sexuality within the family, homosexuality as part of sexuality, sex without love, inheritance among siblings, who takes care of the elderly, the labour market. These are all issues that the film avoids, because they are not easy, and they are depressing. AzulOscuroCasiNegro illuminates them with a look amazing and amazed by a Sánchez Arévalo which speaks not to give us lessons, or for susurarnos, carrying everything to its terrain, and just hablándo in that delightful, sober, sensible, serene tone. The only lesson, the thesis is his incurable romanticism. No doubt the tape that deserved to go to the oscars.
2,689
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/602
Ivan R. Gonzalez
Frankenhooper (Frankenputa)
4
5
muchocine
Even the pobrísimos special effects manage to spoil some scenes born to skip fillings.
The girlfriend of a young medical student dies in a ridiculous crash with a lawn mower. The boy, afflicted, keeps his head in the hope to restore life someday. To do this you will need a new body and what better way to get pieces that women who sell their bodies?The formula is simple: "Frankenhooker" = "Re-Animator" + "The bride of Frankenstein" + "An explosive girl" + touch Henenlotter, director of "Basket Case".Undoubtedly the most successful of the film is its fine (or thick, as you look at it) black humor, seasoned with a touch of ochentera teen comedy. If we also add the mark of the House of the director, the result is little more than curious. The screen will see parade scenes as mad as the of the "putas-bomba", the process of selection of the raw materials or the healthy hobby that Frank has to relax: drilling head (there be donkey). However, among all of them stands out the rebuscadísimo final, so bizarre, so "stories from the crypt", you have to laugh, and in which looms the shadow of "Baseket Case". Even the pobrísimos special effects manage to spoil some scenes born to skip fillings. It is a pity that by a desire to reach a greater audience will spare both in hemoglobin. I am sure that with a little more than "substance" the film would become possibly a small Classic at the same level that the opera prima of the director.Little comment should more be in a movie as simple and modest intentions like this. And as usually happens in the end are the simplest to more effectively manage: fun.
2,690
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1037
Ramón Balcells
Click
2
5
muchocine
A dramatic comedy with touches (several...)(many) not at all bad fiction. It is without doubt, the best film made by Adam Sandler.
We all know that one thing of many forms, can express even though it is imaginary. If one wants to teach you how life can be solved with a simple remote control, that is hateful Adam Sandler. I say hateful because none of his films I has fallen well, except for this, Click, directed by Frank Coraci. Perhaps it is not morally correct the this idea, that with a command solved you all the problems (as if the player had so many!). Well, the fact is that which in the end means you Coraci is to live life the best you can, taking advantage of every moment, though you of laziness, you have to do. It is clear that it is not a great film, those with a background totally hopeful and complex, not. Click is a comedy, or drama rather, come on, the two things (well mixed) Yes, it has a moral background, but it is that you see Adam Sandler and Kate Beckinsale in a cottage with garden and three children and come on, you do not think for a moment that is a serious film. And it is that neither could have been serious. Anyway, the film fulfils its duty and I repeat, knows how to perfectly combine dramatic situations with the comic. But we must also say, and is Coraci film is somewhat irregular. The script is not bad (look at these future sequences that appear at the end), or interpretations not (sobresaltando of Christopher Walken, that every day feel me more that does not know where it is), but shows too many topics and little credible scenes. In any case, not disappointed me at all. In short, a comedy-drama with touches (several...)(many) not at all bad fiction, but also no exception (good). It is without doubt, the best film made by Adam Sandler.
2,691
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1181
Rafa Ferrer
La lista de Schindler
5
5
muchocine
The horror some of so clearly that you can smell, feel, gum and breath almost in 180 minutes of footage, in a clear manner, that takes you to the cries of the casting to the chagrin of sigh and that does not leave you with a clear conscience.
I have to admit and say almost with true embarrassment, which did not remember if he had seen this movie and that everytime someone spoke to me of the masterpiece of Spielberg I shrink from shoulders and rascaba me the head thoughtful I do not remember if I have seen was that repeated over and over again, so as it is to remedy things and have to see the films that are not known, today that had more than enough (at the end of three hours that lasts the same I had seen almost in 5) and, of course, because logically I was pleasantly satisfied. The horror of something so clearly that you can smell, feel, gum and breath almost in 180 minutes of footage in a clear way which takes you in sigh to tears, of the casting to the chagrin and does not leave you with a clear conscience, is true that movies about the Holocaust has been made hundreds and but it's something quite "chewing" is (made in 1993) let in way exemplary role of Oskar Schindlera businessman German who decides to grab the bull by the horns and treat the Jews as they are, human beings and not as "animals" (as they dealt with the nazis). Me is difficult to talk about, almost with tears in his eyes and skin chicken, after as it has made me this film, coldly of which has been transmitted to me (go two days I've been!)(WOW!) but no doubt there are many scenes in which Spielberg knows to convey "something" that goes to the heart of the viewer screen and stays there, sitting, quiet and clear manner during the time of projection, the faces, gestures, hope passenger. Excellent interpretations of Liam Neeson, Ben Kingsley, Ralph Fiennes, in addition to all those actors (unnamed) that make a great role (asi, in all caps) that you're left with the mouth open and the meat of chicken throughout the film. Note also the soundtrack by John Williams, transmitting excellently all moments of the film. It is the typical film that when it ends "let sediment", we as my father said, "that something is and that's what matters" I know that it might be the last people on the face of the Earth that had not seen this movie, so sobran recommendations.
2,692
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3137
Emilio Calvo de Mora
El asesino
2
5
muchocine
Mafia light, popcorn with gunpowder. For at the very least, and that is very welcome in these times of ramblings and semiotics of flea market, the tape is not meant to send any message, do not have any intention to sobering.
This is the trouble that has to film: how easy it is to make box with products of an insulting mediocrity. The murderer is nonsense that does not reach negligible levels of quality of films ametralladas under their same budgets, but is empty, repetitive, devoid of any sense of aesthetics and, more importantly, cleanly nerve orphan. As if the director hired to finish the nuisance, a such Philip g. Atwell, had abandoned all interest in amaze your audience with premeditation, nocturnal and treachery film and had opted (with how easy it is) for photocopying hundreds of stories of vengeance and redemptions, camouflaged under the title of action movie and projected as portentous showcases for the loving viewer of call and other pirotecnica of pure and simple violence. Atwell, without trampling us, recreates that world with correction: Archetypes are perfect, the pranced in the script (with the unexpected end, how not) declared incompetent to follow certain reasonable narrative line and everything is in a pitiful, vacuum, exercise of palomitero film. One more. Does not fit this chronicler of their vices in which is the worst movie of the year, it is not, not even close, but it is important to notify certain demanding public about the inconvenience of engolosinar with the very attractive trailer. Having seen this, you could say simply that we have seen the full movie.The good that has the film is that we are many films to be seen. The murderer does not blur our dossier. Understand that, occasionally, we want to see taureans, japonaiserie, unarmed movies of transcendence. Then there is the commercial gimmick, for whom thus see, together with two experts in skip with falsely kicks in the last few years, Jet Li and Jason Statham. Beyond them to heal band-aid. I saw not the only, but a friend told me a summary which could serve for this nonsense new-age, Pimp and estragante. This excess of bullets (kicks, in honor of the truth, there are not too many, luckily) enfanga a noble genus that is caramelizando, becoming a watered-down pastiche of adrenaline cheap. For at the very least, and that is very welcome in these times of ramblings and semiotics of flea market, the tape is not meant to send any message, do not have any intention to sobering. Covers only the respectable sector of tapes of dissipation mental, as said a friend of mine, but the laudable purpose is drowning in the heavy game of false identities, mentidos honor codes and (go preparing) the infumable closure.
2,693
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4093
Jose Contreras
En el valle de Elah
4
5
muchocine
The film launches against a few political depth charges that his country had abducted during two legislatures.
In a good script, the nail makes the character in the first act serves to hang in the third. The writers have a name for that. The nail, i.e., the element that is going to use later, is called "planting", and the horca, i.e., the second time the element that is used is called "pay off". In each one of the Wilder films would be an endless list of pay offs. Wilder reuses nearly every sentence. In his masterpiece, "The apartment", spare one. Needless to pay off in the end. "That will do Mr Sheldrake?", she asked Baxter. "Send you a cake for Christmas," said Miss Kubelik, recalling the ex-girlfriend of Baxter sent to Baxter a cake for Christmas (planting). Have also left me the "pay off" in this film of Haggis final because, with all its beauty, is too beautiful, too artistic. I think that I'm getting a naturalistic spectator, increasingly want less art and more life. Life does not end with pay offs.Also have too me the story of David and Goliath, which gives rise to the title. It makes me too smart. The father of the dead soldier must tell a story to the child, and as not known storytelling draws on the Bible. But the story that brings by the hairs is that it is the same story, read between the lines, gives us the keys to his own drama.Where Haggis shines with their own light is in the art of storytelling we known to launch us transgressors messages. The father of a young military man of the Iraq Guerra investigates the death of his son adelantándo every step of the research to the inept police. The self-sacrificing father becomes involved in inquiries and details as a sniffer infallible. Work heroic, effective from the father, goes step by step uncovering the murky antiheróica of the child life.The resource to tell two stories is a useless mobile that a street programmer is recovering the media files. The phone is the best Haggis, Haggis "Crash". The screenwriter that offers few facilities and forcing the Viewer to create history since the evidence.Haggis overhangs the Narrator means when it comes to spun separate genera. Cinema black, disappointed, accusing serves to speak of policy U.S. against a country that has not made them any harm. Police movies of good guys with good intentions in the end always discover the bad by far that they hide, serves to speak of emotion of the father, of truncated lives that are falling by the wayside. The film launches against a few political depth charges that his country had abducted during two legislatures. Which, incidentally, they have shown so little moral worth and crucible in their decisions to, certainly you will see Cape to tail the film without being remotely offended.
2,694
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/426
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Corrupción en Miami
3
5
muchocine
Not being good cinema, is not, it is very high level entertainment.
This wave of revivalism that runs us has, in a very personal and biased point of view, rope for a while. It would revise upwards (the current technique at the service of nostalgia) the milestones of the always glorious past. As the memory is greedy and like to return there where he was happy, cinemas will fill when start to fall, truffled of modernism, ñoños episodes of adolescence. Unstoppable machinery of the merchandising will be his army of creatives to find three feet to the cat and all shall acome, with gentleness, to the dictate of the box, that (as we all know) governs with tough hand the ins and outs of that, in principle, it could well call Arte.Bien, Pandora's box is open. And hopefully what comes (and much of what there was) like this Miami Vice Michael Mann.No still good movies, which it is not, is very high level entertainment. Not denied its frivolity, its decay in the strictly plot, but it shines powerfully when Mann, versed in police clashes from his Miami Vice television or from the very acceptable Heat strikes the filming of violence.The roster of stars do what they are told: put the gesture, given the size in composure, although neither have deep parliaments or tormented souls to redeem in ninety minutes of footage. I liked very much Jamie Foxx, who has already shown that it touches all the sticks, and everyone makes with dignity. Spare Colin Farrell, is not an actor with packaging still. and the boats? Don't expect the gentle reader of this page of film the boat vertiginous and series fatigando the Florida Keys dirty waters, although some there is clear. Nor the insistent rhythm of the tune of Jan Hammer. There are (and galore) intrigues Mafia infiltrates, shots, organised crime raids, drugs, prostitutes... As a C.S.I. but overfunded economically. Then there is the majestic end, an absolutely recommendable choreography of shooting in the streets, that leaves the audience breathless: literally.Miami Vice is a product of marketing, is a nod brazen to a successful product, is a long and expensive video clip, but we must not play down the effectiveness and sobriety, love of pointillism, some fondness for the craftsman work (this depth of field with night shots HD cameras).Very notable mimbres to be overly strict with what, for sure, not intended to nothing more than entertain. And do it well.After all, ochentera series was ñoña, abused Armanis and imposing cochazos without coming to story and Don Johnson was an advert actor, but mediocre... Or was the man worth?
2,695
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2795
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Death Proof
4
5
muchocine
Frantic guignol of all the vices of Tarantino, amplified, converted into delicacy for greedy and, of course, garbage for his film enémigos.
Perhaps the verbal incontigencia of the protagonists of Death proof despiste on true cinematic mechanisms of the tape: its predatory revivalism of the exploitation of the 1970s and the double programos scurfy and greasy film little presentable and, above all, autoparódico and a few upstanding wanting to taunt his own seriousness, but Tarantino, the former enfant terrible of filmmanages budgets baggy and the presence of the capitalist duo Weinstein so this trash-movie is not a fiasco, and Amen to feed the ego of its author and its nombradía, click box, which is a noble exercise than Hollywood never despise. There is no Death proof tufo to serie B, while all his dinamitado footage transpire serie B by all their dinamitados pores. Tarantino attends what better do: the linguistic, lúbrico, desvergonzado and paroxysm machine-gunned by a chorus of Greek heroes (heroines in this case) drunk on tequila, bourbon, fast sex, cars impossible horsepower and pleasure hedonistic of violence as a lure for intellectuals open-minded and simple parishioners eager to impact scenes and legs mutilated half of the asphalt. And Orchestra it with talent who has enjoyed a lot with film to the indisimulado pays tribute, this carousel of curved malicious and road bars illuminated by the addictive neon of the beer brands of renown and very grounded soundtrack of the jukebox of the era, capturing the spirit of the entire batch of classics from the Motown or Stax label. At that rate, sweaty and procaz Arlene/Butterfly (Vanessa Ferlito) marks a bold lap dancing that can not be missed without a bow.The narrative merchandise of Tarantino rummages in the predatory ability of a spectator nonconformist, fetish and annulled by the mediocrity of mass culture, which sells consumer universal sampling artifacts, films to have smoothed them the edges so that they can be embedded in all cultures in all countries where it is supposed that it is going to make money. The insolence of Tarantino is to pursue this goal without it note in excess. Ageing of color, the terrible sound quality, roll breaks, gray tones, the burnt frames and even the black-and-white false which then becomes the second tranche of the Ribbon color are winks accomplices to a film already dead, discredited by the very abundantly infumable quality of his proposal, but that has fueled the cinephiles of many of the directors that are now considered essential and that, over time, if they do not enfangan in divismos and unnecessary ombliguismos, will be considered classic. Death proof was justified by that falsified variant of the cinephiles of their creator, but reformulates action cinema, conveniently nostalgic and crowded of film quotes - from Russ Meyer and its Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! the fundamental point limit: zero Sarafian, passing through the cannonballs of Gone in 60 seconds by Halicki or the masterpiece of persecutions by car which is Kirby, the tape of Steve McQueen that put Peter Yates in the Gazetteer of Directors of worship of the seventy. Having seen Planet Terror does not prevent this review complete a tour total on Grindhouse, Opera double Rodriguez and Tarantino that should have been Preparatoria in one session, but the machinery of European distribution has preferred to start with, fracture, doubling revenue and generate one greater expectation. The erotic component amplified in the first part of the tape dwindles in the second, but the tape is swept by this dirty look of worship voyeur. Own character of Stuntman Mike (A formidable Kurt Russell that leads the way that once enjoyed Travolta in his role as Vincent Vega) is a genius of the controlled perversion of the author: a psychopath who had made the delights of Cronemberg, a murderer who destroys women with his car as a ruthless weapon. The populated list of females shadowed memorable moments of other tapes of Tarantino. There are occasions in which we believe we see a scene in Reservoir dogs or those sparkling dialogues, lighted from a morbid fascination with the black series, which make Pulp fiction an absolute masterpiece. Stuntman Mike hunting parts, materials on the asphalt, charged in the second part of the tape new life with a thug trio of female warriors, drawn directly from the bestiary of the inevitable Meyer, not allowing cough them or that a nutty rajada face damaged them their games. But we do not destripemos the end of the Symphony.The viewer outside what Tarantino describes, who does not comulgue with that juicy cinematic B or Z series reference list or blaxpoitation or giallo or everything this Capito man has seen in his earlier days an accomplice, nothing remilgado when it comes to getting bogged down in low-budget products, outs pathetic scenes and provocateurs like few others to translate sex will not enjoy the same as the Viewerviolence and fast cars. This is the perfect recipient of this whim of author, excellent in his daring, maybe swollen minutes to establish itself as a single piece and can be exploited outside the four Unidos.Anoche States scheduled a double session classical tarantiniana (Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown). Opportunism, business vision, Audacity, but opportunity that new public attend, in the front row at home arrebujado the favourite armchair, the delirious imagination of this master.
2,696
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/27
Robgordon
Brokeback mountain
2
5
muchocine
The film more overvalued given the film in recent years
Finally I could see "Brokeback Mountain", the laureada and lauded film from Ang Lee. The film that everyone expected after triumph at the Venice Festival, in a great number of awards American criticism, Golden Globe and almost surely in the Oscars, if no one remedy or anything. "Brokeback Mountain" seems to me from now, the film more overvalued given the film in recent years. And more that me what it will look like if it achieves the maximum statuette.The viewing of this film of landscapes and pastors, I was disappointed. And I record that I have tried here vedado way more objectively as possible, without stick to the large amount of awards granted to date and without stopping to think what is in my view the career of filmmaker Ang director Lee.El Taiwanese has to date an unequalled filmography, as disparate as unpredictablecapable of making "Sense and sensibility" and "The ice storm" and at the same time that martial outburst was "Tiger and Dragon" or a tape of superheroes for the Hollywood as "Hulk" System.And is that Ang Lee demonstrates not having that power that has Clint Eastwood to sensitive stories, with extreme slowness and that you look wonderful. And that here he tries, but get this love story between the two Cowboys to be insufferable, long and tedious. "Brokeback Mountain" tells a story of misunderstood love, of impossible love. That I've already seen many times before, and with a greater passion and interest in a large number of films. I will cite an example, in which I not Alexios of rural, of the time and setting the pace; "The bridges of Madison County" by Clint Eastwood, which I think is key, as a comparison judging definitively as major Lee's tape work. Only some glances between Meryl Streep and Clint Eastwood in the film already contain higher doses of passion than the two hours and quarter of the Cowboys of the mountain.And it is that regardless of "Brokeback Mountain" is a homosexual, heterosexual history or whatever, is first and foremost a love story that does not transmit a light feeling to the Viewer.The history of "Brokeback Mountain" never reaches fonde because never get pass that character of relationship which, in part, fails to be consummated by issues or social prejudices. The few strokes giving Ang Lee, on the fear that may exist in the characters on the relationship, are slim to convince us.In addition the protagonists are extremely loose in his performances. Ledger and Gyllenhall are expressionless. You never know that they are thinking, what are their intentions, and not simply put face of angry or angry. Extremely loose in their roles. Only salvaria the submissive wife, Michelle Williams, which has the best level of the film, when he discovers her husband kissing with Jake Smith.Como equally weak is your script, very flat, which outlines just a few notes of all this footage long lag between sheep, mountains and esporadicos meetings, without developing any of the sub-plots, while none of them captures the attention. The work is therefore totally of the direction, that puts in her practice this little theory offered their script, lengthening the meetings of its protagonists, which are repeated over and over again for the viewer boredom as much as possible.And is that when the landscapes you seem more beautiful and interesting than the story of love that is this, is that something is not working. Fails the passion, emotion fails, fails as poignant. "And that is extremely important in a film which is giving the title of masterpiece with great ease.""Brokeback Mountain" I has known little even to wasted film. Is true that Ang Lee is not intended to make a plea for homosexuality, just tell a romantic story, but if some small brushstrokes of no social acceptance which never comes to finish pointing. It seems that at times has wanted to give longer life to the film, introducing new and possibly interesting passages (such as the of the father-in-law of Jake Smith), but it ends up being prisoner of the script, the story and little claw of the relationship that is based solely and exclusively this film. It is not that the Taiwanese who lived in Hollywood film has nothing in his favor, only the intention of telling a romantic history with a classic cut already gives some point in its favour, in these days they run. "Another thing is that her it was able to take advantage of or shape with enough intensity on the screen, which is not the case.""Brokeback" is that films where his music you seems wonderful or charisma, his photography and precious or pretentious places, its sublime history or empty, void or great performances, his script perfect or bulb. For me, these land forbidden, are today more overvalued than yesterday, but less than tomorrow.
2,697
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2892
José A. Peig
La jungla de cristal
5
5
muchocine
A millimeter dash harmonized to perfection in which needless to him nor lacks nothing. A fun action toy that goes beyond genre to tell us a story full of tenderness, irony, good dose of bad milk, homages and cinematic events, and reformulation of clichés.
A plane lands, a solo passenger who listens with sorna Council of the traveler that accompanies it from the adjacent seat. Under the jacket hide a revolver. It is a police officer. At the airport he hoped a driver with his name written on a poster. We know that his name is John McClane, has traveled to Los Angeles, and California is his first irony. It is a common man, and seems to guess that it has not come to the right place. Twilight reigns over the city of Los Angeles while the driver does not stop with your questions. McClane is taciturn with strangers, “ confined to lead ”. But the driver insists, and so we know it has wife and children, and that it has come to be reunited with his family on this Christmas night. In previous sequences, we see Holly Gennaro inside a huge building, talking on the phone with her daughter, it asks about dad but Holly doesn't know if they will be able see it tonight. Camera describes a short flat sequence until one of the photographs. There are Holly and her husband, the newly arrived by plane. Out in the great Hall, Mr Takagui encourages its guests a holiday for all high on the eve of Christmas. By the Windows enter the reddish light of dusk. Holly pushes the picture with rage and resentment appears in the story. McClane drops the car, a contrapicado expresses the grandeur of the Nakatomi Plaza building, and its latent threat. Threat in the form of family discussion, or a vehicle approaching with stealth from any part of the city. Regardless of the characteristics of action cinema, a plot twist that occurs in the approach to the narrative (not necessarily in the knot or the outcome) is a laudable dose of dramatic force. Die Hard starts as a family drama starring a citizen foot “ lost ” in a place outside their interests (he prefers New York, but his wife is in Los Angeles), which will have to face old marital squabbles. Suddenly, became embroiled in a desperate struggle against a group of armed men who assail the building and take his wife - and the rest of those present at the party - as a hostage. Films such as “ Rambo ”, “ Rambo ” and similar, so frequent in the Decade of the eighties, products already start demonstrating the preponderance in the story of the violent action, personified in the cliché “ musculitos ” shift, either Sylvester Stallone or Arnold Schwarzenegger. Jungle of glass, on the other hand, proposes to develop the violent action on the basis of an ordinary human being and a framed (marital crisis, voluntary migration) situation in other film genres, namely the melodrama. The violent action is the lever that restores the hero on their marital problems and his role as a police officer. In short, allows you to use the action genre to tell a meaningful and solid story in their dramatic budgets while it reformulates the idea of the “ tough guy ”, and elevates it to the rank of art. John McTiernan directed with effectiveness and passion on the basis of a written script detail and a seamless Assembly work, in which each dialogue, every scene and chaining of scripts, each new element introduced in the development of the adventure will serve as a cornerstone to a conclusion in which all roles converge. Let us not forget that Crystal jungle baby cinema of catastrophes, and narrates a collective drama in which human as a whole is divided into two blocks; those who live the experience from the inside of the building (McClane, terrorist), and those who live it from the outside (police, citizens, press). In this way, the story offers two perspectives, outstanding contribution to narrative dynamic and to the creation of antagonistic, which also gives rise to an ironic game between these two human groups. Note the bias on information from police officers on the reality of the lived circumstances by McClane and the hostages, which contributes to raise the turn of claustrophobic drama: the dissociation between the outside world and what happened in the interior of the Nakatomi building emphasizes the solitude of the hero, and becomes the terrorists the real puppeteers (for example)McClane scene on the roof firing into the air to save the hostages. The us on board the helicopter think that it is killing the hostages. Or that of “ maybe was a depressed broker “). This reaches the extremes when appear the two FBI agents with the anti-terrorist manual in hand. Each of his actions is a step forward for the intruders; Hans Grubber statement: “ you asked a miracle and I give you the FBI ”. Reading that is outside of what happened in the interior of the building, serves, from purely plot, to justify development of Grubber operation and theirs. For purposes of cinematic texture, creates an ironic tone, a ridicule of the security forces which autoarrogan the role of protectors of the citizen. The schema and structure are designed with the aim of extolling the figure of the unsung hero, a simple police found by chance in the epicenter of the action, the existence of which some even deny. The writers, in his excellent work of writing, not forgot to introduce a link to unite the two separated worlds, and features the character portrayed by Reginald Veljohnson (agent Powell). Within the global catastrophe, the film features a subhistoria in this description of the friendship that emerges between Powell and McClane via auditory communication. A description and development not devoid of sensitivity, since it establishes a spiritual connection and empathy between the two characters: Powell admits the tragedy of his past, and McClane confesses his weakness in its role as spouse and as a human being found in a situation that surpasses. Thus opposition to solitary confinement, the cynicism and the inhumanity prevailing between the two worlds represented in the remaining set Agent Powell and McClane are a cry of hope and fraternity in the midst of chaos. And in the final scene, we see the success of circumscribing the relationship of friendship - hitherto - auditory communication. The look of appreciation and complicity between the two in their first face to face meeting puts the final flourish, and any viewer who has apprehended the sensitive significance of the relationship described earlier, cannot prevent the lump in my throat, especially when Powell releases past trauma to kill Karl (Alexander Godunov) to save the life of McClane and his wife. Attention to underline that the soundtrack of Michael Kamen at the time of the action, and the expression on the face of Veljohnson. THIS IS FILM, GENTLEMEN. The CANON for a good action film requires the presence of a wrong with charisma, and there we have the unforgettable Hans Grubber. If drawing (characterization) of the character is already in itself attractive (cynicism, lack of scruples, sense of humor, engolado language and references to the classics) the charisma of a so prodigious as Alan Rickman actor does the rest. Its antithesis, John McClane, a vulnerable human being facing the tragedy with irony and sense of humor, expressions testosterónicas that relax the tension of the story to draw a smile at any time (“ hear, not fuck me miss, do you think that I am entrusting a pizza? ”, or better still, “ nine million terrorists in the world and I think kill one foot of woman ”). The large handicap of McClane, as a fictional character, is its ability to provoke empathy and connect with the spectator, because of its intrinsic characteristics. The spectator living and suffering from the adventure from the point of view of McClane, hence the absorbent quality of the story. The architecture of the Nakatomi building induces the feeling of claustrophobia from the visual-físico stratum, complementary to the claustrophobic nature, from a purely psychological layer provided by the above-mentioned dissociation between interior and exterior of the building. Tunnels, rooms, corridors, ventilation ducts and elevators, constitute the appropriate setting for the virtuous of a violent action that always moves in the field human and credible. In some moments, the fire and fumes that wrap to McClane evokes the aesthetics of Ridley Scott, Alien or Aliens Cameron testosterónica action. Who doubts that part of the plot and thematic idea of the film is inspired in “ Rambo “, “ shark ” and “ Alien “. The death of Grubber deserves special mention, the gesture of McClane after the Resolutive shot - blowing to the mouth of its revolver-evocation of John Wayne (to which the same Grubber had alluded), moment in which the hero acquires almost supernatural stroke, sublimation of its anonymous to move to the area of the film myth, but from his human basenot from the cliché pre-established. The fall of Grubber, the simple thief who is posing as terrorist, induces the last bias. Someone, back down, he said: “ hope it's not a hostage. ” Already with McClane outside the building, and rain a poetic of banknotes that evokes the prolongation of the farce, profiles representatives from each of the unlinked worlds converge to settle scores. In the end, only McClane account, the new hero that synthesizes to John Wayne and Rambo with a touch of simple - not simple - humanity, and who experience lived in the interior of the Nakatomi building has been reason for marital reconciliation (the kiss in the back seat of the car). A final which converges with the home. THAT is telling a story. And it is not a question of taste, but to know the fundamentals of the narration. There are no more words. A millimeter dash harmonized to perfection in which needless to him nor lacks nothing. A fun action toy that goes beyond genre to tell us a story full of tenderness, irony, good dose of bad milk, homages and cinematic events, and reformulation of clichés. A reformulation has not yet found a model that goes beyond. Surprised that a genus so prude as does the action film based on the figure of the “ tough guy ” can offer as much as it offers the masterpiece of John McTiernan. We are dealing with a genuine film miracle, mainly thanks to a script that articulates a variety of themes and structures without this variety hinders the fluidity needed in this type of movies. Current filmmakers (and especially the writers) should take note. Die hard is CANON, the rule and the model to overcome. Every product of action, at the very least, not close to the quality of work (work writing, especially), inventiveness and characterization of characters exhibited in die hard, will be, at least, a mediocre product. Good work and dedication in previous works was not to fall into the complacent anecdote or oblivion, but to be revered and try to transcend (exceed) their achievements. These are the rules for a quality action cinema, although some insist on denying it.
2,698
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/999
Radon
The Queen
3
5
muchocine
The film is entertaining and interesting, especially for recent events, but when it ended, my feeling was more of an intention by the creator of the film, to reconcile the public with the image of the monarchy.
Under my humble opinion, find it me an almost documentary film to close to the events in the English Royal House under the death of Lady Di, and especially seen from the point of view of the Riena, Isabel Inglaterra.La film is entertaining and interesting, especially for recent events, but when it ended, my feeling was more than an intention, by the creator of the film, to reconcile the public with the image of the monarchy.I will frankly take it as a romantic vision of what could happen by the mind of the monarch after the death of Lady Di, and not what actually happened. In any case I prefer the exceptional interpretation of "Helen Mirren," actress that I was completely unknown until this film.As well as the similar physicist of the Queen is amazing, is very far away the reflection of Prince Charles in the actor who plays him, Alex Jennings. Back that gives the pego, but seen in the face I think improves too present.
2,699
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/51
Caty
Brokeback mountain
5
5
muchocine
A beautiful love story regardless of the sexual preference of each
Many of the great stories of all time love in literature as in the film they revolve, mainly around of couples who, possessed by a love and a ravishing passion, are required to maintain separate aspects social, political or social conventions: Brokeback Mountain, the new work by Taiwanese filmmaker Ang Lee has one of these storiesthat revolves around two people who, unable to take in front of everyone what they feel for the other, processed differently their feelings.The point that the lovers in question are men is a mere detail. It is obvious that an affair between two Cowboys, iconic figures of the imagination of the American cinema, would be something difficult to describe, however, the beautiful script by Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana(inspirado_en_el_relato_corto_de_Annie_Proulx) this obstacle becomes a story in which the relationship between the two characters has a natural and sensitive manner: hired to save a herd of sheep on top of Brokeback Mountain, Ennis of del Mar (Heath Ledger) and Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) are taken to isolate themselves from the world for a few months, taking only the company of the other. Initially reserved (especially Ennis), establish ties gradually, first becoming friends, confident then and, to the surprise of both, in lovers. This connection is already established, the Cowboys begin an impossible affair which, through decades, will be becoming increasingly more tragic depending on the conflict between two such different temperaments.The film portrays the relationship between Jack and Ennis as something more than a simple sexual desire: prisoners in realities that are hostile, the two men face their sporadic meetings as opportunities to relax and feel happy, complete. Married and converted to parents, they exchanged confidences about their marital problems and other heterosexual encounters. Fleeing from stereotypes which can degrade the characters, Ledger and Gyllenhaal offer fundamental actions for the success of the narrative; as Ennis, Ledger maintains a position always tense and expression constantly closed, as if he was eternally defending himself from an attack that can come at any moment. Introspective and repressed, just difficult to express their feelings, embrutecido by a miserable existence and by abandonment, Ennis is protection in the silence - even when, the mouth speaks barely opens him, as if that would represent an awesome effort-. Thus, the intensity of what he feels for Jack represents, for, a blessing and a curse: on the one hand, with the cowboy it feels free to express se(aunque_no_mucho), on the other hand, the burden of guilt and fear caused by an environment full of prejudices transforms it into a figure haunted by what he is feeling. Jack Gyllenhaal, for its part, embodies a Jack Twist as a person frankly more emotional and willing to accept (and express) the own feelings. When given says that he feels for Ennis is sincere and is love, no doubt to suggest that they stop their wives and live together, although they run the risk of becoming victims of violence inspired by intolerance.In addition to this, one of the issues that most fascinate me of Brokeback Mountain is the respect for the nature of the relationship of Ennis and Jack: while the latter is obviously gay, showing sexual interest in other men, the first ever denotes a similar attraction. The impression that Ennis falls in love with Jack by the mere fact of being a man is therefore, a mere coincidence. When you are away from Twist, Ledger's character never appears to repair in other men, showing clearly more attracted to the opposite sex. On the other hand, the only heterosexual relationship that we know by Jack is his wife, showing a strong personality from the moment in which arises on the screen, and to confer on Jack the status of passive half of marriage - even sexually, that the initiative address it is hers.This is why that Ennis would not tolerate know about other homosexual relationships of Jack; for Ennis, this situation represents something unique that it only affects them, and discover that Twist maintains relationships with other men would be a blow too hard for the. Unfortunately for both, Ennis isn't capable of taking what feels in a comprehensive manner, and is not only regarding the relationship with Jack, but it also becomes inaccessible to the wife and daughters.But not only the male cast that shines in this film: the tortured wife of Ennis Del Mar, soul (played by Michelle Williams) builds a character whose lack of culture and intellectual sophistication, allied with the machismo of the society in which he lives, prevents adoption of a stance more determined in relation to the romance of her husband with another man. And if Anne Hathaway has the opportunity to demonstrate her dramatic scope during a difficult conversation keeps with Ennis by phone when his character is forced to recognize hard truths which always sought to ignore, the veteran Roberta Maxwell, as the mother of Jack, offers a very good scene in which shows his pain and its compression simply through the eyes, in a performance that deserved (almost more than that of Williams) a nomination for the Oscar.Envuelta by the beautiful instrumental soundtrack of Gustavo Santaolalla, shown as intimate as the interpretation of Heath Ledger, Brokeback Mountain also has a subtle but effective work on the artistic direction: observe as for example, the House of Ennis and Alma features colors always sad and oppressivereflecting the gray existence of marriage, and as also the residence of Jack and Lureen is clearly decorated with the taste of it, helping to display the character of Gyllenhaal as a stranger in your own home. Elements like these help demonstrate the sensitivity as a filmmaker Ang Lee, who is also right to establish a pace slow, contemplative, allowing to know the characters with the necessary calm. It also must be said against that Lee should have demanded a makeup for Heath Ledger, that his ageing, despite the optimal performance of the actor, not convinced much to say.Leaving aside the homosexuality, love story told in Brokeback Mountain comes to be universal. It is perfectly possible, for any viewer, identify with the pain of the protagonists, regardless of sexual options each. That's why, in the list of great tragic romances in the history of the cinema has to leave a site also for Jack Twist and Ennis Del Mar.