Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,700 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3675 | Oscar Martínez | Negra Navidad | 1 | 5 | muchocine | With joke performances and a dismal script, Black Christmas loses interest after ten minutes of footage, offering us one of the manic with less charisma of recent times. | In 1974 Bob Clark directed Black Christmas, a horror film with included psychopath that marked a landmark in what is commonly known as slasher movies, even though that term would begin to be used a few years later, with films such as Halloween night and Friday 13.Pues well, following American rush of remakes, this year reaches the Sitges Festival Black Christmas (or Black x-mas)(, as you prefer), with Glenn Morgan as director and screenwriter, adapted the story and original characters of Roy Moore. The cast features Mary Elisabeth Winstead along with Katie Cassidy, Michelle Trachtenberg, Lacey Chabert, Kristen Cloke, Andrea Martin, Crystal Lowe and Oliver Hudson.Black Christmas puts us on Christmas Eve, in a college fraternity where a group of young people are prepared to return with their families. During the eve, the supervisor of the fraternity will have them the murky history of Billy, a psychopath currently locked up in an insane asylum who grew up in that same House years ago. Thereafter, girls will be receiving strange phone calls and one after another, will disappear.Peñazo often, gentlemen.I must admit that I have not seen the film of 1974, and I breathed deeply when I speak to IMDB to compare scores between original and remake, I found a not inconsiderable 7'2 (6'6 in Filmaffinity) against a sad 4'5. And it is that before films such as Black Christmas, one cannot ask what's necessary to ¿.era?.Totally devoid of order and any appeal, Black Christmas get each one of their frames emanates a stale smell of beans and a bland feeling of déjà vu, with few plot twists, zero tension and the slightest incentive that can offer the viewer a minimally entertaining story. In fact, Glenn Morgan film even is able to give us the comfort of offal, in a film that seems rather a compilation of the American horror film clichés.With rather joke performances and a quite dismal script, Black Christmas loses interest, if at some point peak it, ten minutes of footage, offering us one of the manic with less charisma of recent times and a group of actresses who barely we can differentiate, in a film in which neither his loud music in the supposedly high moments manages to get out of the overall compressor.So therefore, this nonsense called Black Christmas passes directly and in positions of honor, to the growing list of horror films to forget with titles as head of death, White noise 2: the light, or crocodile: a serial killer, clear example of the dearth of ideas that American horror this suffering in recent times.I give it a 2 out of 10, to give something. |
2,701 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2190 | Iñaki Bilbao | Un hombre llamado caballo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | An almost mythical title in the history of the western. It is a story of marked anthropological dye, describing the actual customs of Indians portrayed in the story. | "An English Aristocrat is captured by a tribe of Indians sioux, than the undergo various torture to make sure of its value." "Once demonstrated, will become its head in his fight against other tribes enemy".An almost mythical title in the history of the western. It is a story of marked anthropological dye, describing the actual customs of Indians portrayed in the story. The film is interesting only for that reason. But there are other elements that must be taken into account to explain the great success which saw this tape. On one side is the interpretation of Harris: insurmountable. The beautiful landscapes and the action scenes, very collected. It is perhaps not as good as said some, but it is worth the trouble.Unforgettable scene in which Harris becomes full-fledged one member of the tribe. A tough, violent, cruel, shocking scene. |
2,702 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/45 | Caty | Buenas noches y buena suerte | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Lesson civic, worthy of being shown in schools | It is incredible (and depressing) that a story that happened 50 years ago can be as current as the narrated in "good night and good luck". The climate conspiracy that exists today in part of American society is not very different from the one led by Joseph McCarthy during the Decade of the cincuenta-la difference is that an invented history, is not if at that time those who questioned the Senator feared they were branded "Communists", today the critics of Bush and his cohort are questioned as regards "patriotism" that can feel or, in extreme cases, classified as supporters of terrorism.What remains today, therefore, is that someone take the place of Edward r. Murrow, legendary CBS flagship, and in its programme "See it now" was essential, with its criticisms and reports, for the sinking of McCarthy. Instead, the newspaper Guild (including Spanish) comes to be dominated by cowardly figures and without ethics, whose search for truth was diluted in time for corporate and political interests: therefore, the figure of Murrow, with his courage, his ethics and his career, is a real class of journalism (good night, and good luck should be exhibited in schools only by the splendid speech made by the "character" in the beginning) (and the conclusion of the film).Set in a period of time relatively short, from October 1953 to may of the 54 (with the exception of the aforementioned speech, occurring in the 58) the screenplay written by George Clooney and Grant Heslow shows Murrow and his team at the peak of the McCarthyism, when the climate of paranoia fostered by the Senator carried Aviation forces us to expel a Lieutenant based on anonymous reports related to the father of the military (something which gives rise to an episode of "See it Now", dedicated to the case). From here, Murrow and his producer Fred Friendly, begin a search that would result in a program in which used the words of McCarthy against the. Returning to the Chair of director after his excellent "confessions of a dangerous mind", Clooney shows rather content this time, avoiding strange camera movements and concentrate more in the dialogues and the tense atmosphere inspired by the clash between two large forces: the media and politics. In an effort to maximize to rescue visual taste and mentality of the era, the director uses advertising pieces produced in the fifties and includes small interludes throughout the narrative in which Diane Reeves arises singing Classic Jazz give the film a nostalgic tone. Reeves holdings represent the only musical tape interventions, as Clooney-following one trend growing contemporary filmmakers - discards the use of soundtrack. Photography, black and white work of Robert Elswit, usa the shadows in a superb way, by adopting a realistic tone, and stressing that, throughout the film, there are only a plane outdoors, highlighting that dark tone that reflects a battle within the buildings is underway.Clooney as an actor, also does a good job to orchestrate actions: in the middle of a very competent cast Frank Langella deserves a special mention for giving life to William S. Palley, President of CBS, and he is portrayed as a man divided by corporate obligations and its commitment to journalistic ethics. We also are Ray Wise, who embodies the tragic Don Hollembeck with sympathy and suffered dignity, while Robert Downey Jr. and Patricia Clarkson teach us the problems of a couple that should hide his union bosses, prohibiting marriage between workers. Finally, the Clooney himself, with his usual charisma, established an air of important complicity between the Fred Friendly and Edward Murrow, played by David Strathairn. The latter, as it could not be otherwise, represents the absolute centre of the film: famous and prestigious, journalist never settles in the status that is, looking for, rather than maintaining this status, new battles to make just the influence who can exert on the public. With an always formal air in front of the cameras, the journalist tries to present a facade firm and safe, although the film would win more dimension if we had access to other facets of the journalist, as his family life, or their well-known attraction to the danger, often showing in risky reports during the second war Mundial.Consciente of the importance of this projectGeorge Clooney used to Murrow as a symbol of the journalistic virtues: after the program in which they unmask McCarthy, we feel as these men will sleep with pride at night. At present, what we have today is ever overturned programming with the vacuum and surface. Television has become, as predicted by Murrow into something banal, wasting his potential newsletter for entertainment, most of the time, empty and disposable, becoming a weapon for the rulers who want to keep people distracted in a constant vacuum of information.Good night, and good luck is more than a film interesting and efficient: is a civic lesson as those that own Murrow was in charge of teaching in its programme. |
2,703 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3395 | Kiko de España | La Zona | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A dramatic thriller that fortunately or unfortunately does not seem to be too close to any of the references that you would come to the head like Fincher, Hitchcock or Haneke. Interesting proposal of Rodrigo Plá, will have to keep track of. | I would have loved that my old criticism would be special, but time and hurry send, so it will be the penultimate movie of press that he witnessed via Muchocine the lucky. And they are many more. Thanks to the boss and greetings to my colleagues!Alejandro is a boy of sixteen years who lives in the area, a complex closed resdencial surrounded by a huge wall, self-sufficient and tough private security. The area is the last bastion of humanity, at least to the naked eye and the families that live there have been forced to do so because outside the crime and violence are growing alarmingly.A stormy night three criminals entering the zone such an argument would give for a claustrophobic thriller to the Haneke, a refined kind Hitchcock suspense to a claustrophobic juggling to the Fincher.Por luck or unfortunately Rodrigo Plá, the director of this film premiered in Venice as best opera prima and with the prize of the international critics in Toronto is decided more by a violent drama about corruptionthe Division and hatred of a society increasingly broken.It is a hunting man and a harsh social criticism with many points in common with the masterpiece of Shyamalan, The Village última(por_el_momento). The cast highlights a splendid Daniel Giménez-Cacho as father of Alexander and one of the thinking heads of the Zona.Con an end too elongated prevents somehow appreciate all its hardness La zone is a curious exercise in style and renewal of the thriller worth viewing. |
2,704 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1005 | Dragon negro | La alianza del mal | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The argument does not look bad and could have worked well and even be a new lost boys, if not because the film makes water everywhere. | Go another translation of title in English too, because a time view the movie not be I where they have released such an Alliance, but well, let's get to the topic that is to comment on the film. The Covenant is the latest film from director Renny Harlin, a director who has come to make films so successful as the second part of the jungle of glass, Deep Blue Sea or the adventures of Ford Farlaine and lately seems to have lost the North with as mediocre as Driven, hunters minds films or the Exorcist: the beginning, and the latter do nothing but confirm that this guy is not that was before because it remains in its line of mediocre pulling bad.The plot of the film looks entry rather more than what we can then see, a group of four young friends who belong to families with a lineage of witchcraft and who have inherited magical powers. All goes well until they begin to happen strange things and discover that there is another boy just like them from a lost lineage and that he intends to steal their powers. This is basically the argument, that might have worked well and even be a new lost boys, if not because the film makes water everywhere.The four friends are a few chulitos and guaperas of very careful at a boarding school for people with pasta and they are dedicated to using his powers for anything less for something useful, osease cool, search match, jumping from cliffs, impress the girls and hesitation between them. The largest is which makes leading and sensible of the group, and which captures all the prominence, the other three appear rarely and only their characters are developed, is also the new and cute girl of course, he falls in love with the prota, all this with a cart of topicazos more, apart from some dialogues that directly cause embarrassment. But the best is the character that makes bad, all directly connected with him is worth. And is that it does anything that makes sense, if we think a little on the steps to get to where you want to see that they lack all logic and reason and that perfectly the writer could have sought a way more coherent and less topical portraying the antagonist and develop it.To all this nonsense, we add a final fight which found me the most ridiculous and charisma thing I've seen in a long time in the cinema with special effects used in the most clumsy and repetitive way imaginable. |
2,705 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2993 | Natalia Eseverri | Hairspray | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It is a film which we must not ask del olmo pears, simply excited the music lovers and is trying to do with the smile of the poor that should accompany that likes this kind of movies. | It is a sentencing phrase that I loved nothing more to hear it: the tastes are like ass, everyone has one.And it is that I used to refer to a genre that excites me and to which I cannot give an explanation of why and is the musical. Simply because I let spread by the energy given off and me magnetized by very tontorrona as it may seem.In the middle of a critical message against racist prejudices that had at that time, we have a movie that sandwiched the most many-colored songs along with a sixties who falls in love with and look that dazzles to what is happening in every scene.Away from the histrionic could be the image of a characterized John Travolta of women, we have a sensitive interpretation, allowing that while your're acknowledging the Zucco Danny of Grease, really fun with the image being the mother of the protagonist in the film, complemented by a great Christopher Walken.Aunque already know my devotion to the Pfeiffer and in this film is not for lessfew actresses are provided to interpret the characters evil with so much grace and naturalness as she makes it and also aderazada with this sensuality that characterizes it, much to overdo it.It is a film which we must not ask del olmo pears, simply excited the music lovers and is trying to do with the smile of the poor that should accompany that likes this kind of movies.I have also had the opportunity to have fun with Os declare husband and husband, whose surprise is having fun and make me laugh in such a way, without all the jokes in the trailer have been spent. A good comedy for escape from the real world and drop that laugh camouflaged during our usual life.And another side, Angelina Jolie, shows one of his best performances in an untamed heart, we notice that the actress much fought for that role and that he had in his conscience that the own Marianne Pearl, the real protagonist of what happens in the film, he chose it to her to interpret it.It is a film that reaches the heart reminded me of the feeling I had when I left the cinema to see United 93, because you know that these things happen in the world, but see them recreated and masterfully told in a film, you are still surprising though you know as they occur.Soon, get me internet at home with which I can update the habitually that I like and as a final Coda, on a day when I can not be locutando because we do not have emission where I'm working, is that I have been granted the mortgage of my flat, which I'm happy because I arruinaré for 40 years, but having a sofa and a dvd to watch my movies. |
2,706 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4211 | Javier Martínez | Paris, Texas | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Harry Dean Stanton plays perfectly to the defeated man, one who knows that happy days now will not return ever. If you see the movie its sad eyes will accompany you throughout life. | There are times that you see that the road you've gone was not correct, and the wisest way of doing things (and the hardest) is go back to the beginning and start again.Harry Dean Stanton plays perfectly to the defeated man, one who knows that happy days now will not return ever. If you see the movie its sad eyes will accompany you throughout life. Today looking for his filmography I noticed account that appeared in "For a fistful of dollars", "The conquest of the West", "The godfather" and even "the legend of el indomable", in which played banjo in ready "Midnight special" and "Cotton fields" in its original way before that Creedence Clearwater Revival made its great versions. In any case is a genius of the interpretation that I always went unnoticed.And the world discovered in "Paris, Texas" the magical beauty of Nastassja Kinski, a woman that I still do not know their origin. Is it American?. Russian?. Another world perhaps?. Too beautiful to be human.If we add to this that is headed by Wenders (quality assurance), that the picture is superb with flat barbarians of the Mojave Desert, Ry Cooder music put goose bumps and has a few scary dialogues (especially of the peep-show) is not to lionize the Olympus of modern cinema. It is difficult to make a better psychological portrait without bore. I even see like a prehistoric history of Forrest Gump.Me films that transmit a message of hope in its sediment, because once I've said it here. Somewhere has to see the light, and if not then is to make holes upwards for the next come back. Neither more nor less. This is the people I admire. Like you, Travis:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jMAWY5JRPw |
2,707 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3837 | Iñaki Bilbao | American Gangster | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Excellent example of film noir today. It will be, without a doubt, one of the films that are in the list for the next ceremony of the Hollywood Oscars. | Excellent film Ridley Scott that, even if the tape is custom, achieves a very interesting Chronicle of the late sixties and early Harlem of the seventies, when the heroin came in the country and with it great corruption to all levels it, made shake the American society.Scott get a fascinating portrait of a time and two antagonistic men, the best professionals in their own. It does so thanks to a rich script by Steven Zaillian, who always withdraws all common, and an agile direction, with a wonderful montage, brilliant performances and a bright, clear and concise narrative energy.While it lasts two and a half hours, or you find out, being entretenidísima at any time. There is not a single plane over and downtime or little interesting simplemennte not exist.A thriller of gangsters and policemen, which will delight the most demanding Viewer.There perhaps the level of ethics is something controversial, if you want, because it is true that, despite the fact that the prologue may not be more clarifier on the personality of the protagonist, at all times get, if not sympathy, yes the admiration or respect for his person. Being a lethal criminal, who did so much damage in reality, it can be this wrong fact. But in toto moment seems to me that things are clear and not fool anyone here.In his short epilogue, that has been said enough, maybe it's true. It could have been cut perfectly, but Scott and screenwriter have shown for, I say, we can see that progress, what represented the protagonist in his profession is presented in all its ferocity, after almost twenty years. "An irony, or simply evidence.""American Gangster" will, undoubtedly, one of the films that are in the list for the next ceremony of the Hollywood Oscars. |
2,708 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4080 | Rafa Ferrer | Redacted | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Since childhood I have heard listening to my father that "Nobody wins in the wars" and once again and in view of this movie I can not be more than agreement, since there is no neither winners nor losers, only shattered families, humiliated people... | Bryan De Palma after his "Femme Fatale"(que_quitando_a_Rebecca_Rojmin,_me_pareció_un_poco_rollo) and "The Black Dahlia" (which seemed curious, although disappointing) points to the mockumentary genre to compose here a fairly constructive criticism to the prevailing patriotism and war these days takes place in the Middle, where again and it hurts the mouth tell citizens of Iraq are less "pobrecillos" of what he believes in USAon the other hand, and as in "Hearts of iron" embody, in a way more than television (and in full age of Youtube), one of the unfortunate events in year 2006 in full conflict belico, when some American soldiers, trying to avenge the death of one of its members of Squad, raped and murdered a girl, and were charged to the family of this without any kind of punches or suspicions.Since childhood I have heard listening to my father that "Nobody wins in the wars" and once again and in view of this movie I can not be more than agreement, since there is no neither winners nor losers, just shattered families, humiliated people, and most bodies in bags.Between the characters (perfectly embodied by a group of unknown actors) have all kinds of stereotypes, the Latin (which is here the camera of this documentary), stoked the war, and the sensitive, that all are are exchanging roles as progresses the action; on the other hand, De Palma affects too a kind of Puritanism in some moments, and brutality in others, leaving the lame and, like tape that made Robert Reford in "Lions for Lambs" not coming to be involved at all when it should, and at other times more than necessary implicandose.Between about revenge and attacks of others dedicated to avail themselves of a species of snake biting its tail, and that unfortunately, plasma, small (and great stay) is a war.Perhaps the best thing is (and I'll take a textual phrase) "better you have a reason that your friend die in your arms, not ensure fly in a million pieces".In short, another prism of the fearful and current war of Iraq. |
2,709 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3005 | Andrés Pons | Payasos Asesinos Del Espacio Exterior | 4 | 5 | muchocine | One of the funniest stronger from the 80's. Entertainment pure and simple that should not asked you large cinematographic expectations. | What you say of one of the most crappy but at the same time charming 1980s films? An entertainment of principle to the Chiodo brothers then devoted to the work of special effects for example in films such as Critters without going back to the leadership.We are before a tribute from the films of invasions with teenagers with exceptional makeup especially meritorious by its tiny budget.You of course don't have to take seriously or ask a good achievement as this is an exploitation of the time as only intends to do so have fun.The truth is that it does by far and this I think that you must satisfy the expectations. Performers include the gorgeous Suzzanne Snyder starred "Explosive women" or Grant Gramer that he acted in other serie b "Elves, end of the damn year" ultimately a film for fun as nice without damage. |
2,710 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3185 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Tre metri sopra il cielo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Friendship, racing motorcycles, clashes of classes, a species of umpteenth Romeo and Juliet with a freshness that makes it delicious. | Tre Metri Sopra Il Cielo is based on the eponymous book by the Italian writer Federico Moccia that enjoyed great popularity in his country among the new youth. Precisely this same public is directed the film who consumed the tape with a voracious desire because it's an exquisite exercise of reflection on the transition to adulthood and because the healthy habit of down to Earth to raise current social issues outside the comedy had been lost in Italy. Its content is not very original and we raked nauseam: good girl meets bad boy, they fall in love and happen events in the middle that seek to break away from his love. Friendship, racing motorcycles, clashes of classes, a species of umpteenth Romeo and Juliet with a freshness that makes it delicious. Wouldn't be interesting if it were not because unlike our American in Europe friends no we are concerned both the end and the means so the interpretation of a handful of kids talent and a dash more worried about being faithful to the spirit of their own characters to the culture of the happy end get that, all that we enjoy with this film of transition to adulthoodWe can taste this tape. I.e. between the bunch of confusing people there are some who, albeit only slightly, can represent every type of public facilities including more adults.The beauty lies in the rapport with their characters. Rather than fall mere stereotypes are an evolution of themselves and have nothing to do with what was at the beginning of the film when they reach its denouement. Original is the link that guides us through the tape with a voice-over from of an invented Italian radio, 107.3 FM Radio chaos, which is a reflection for each event and we are always left with a thought like "live from the future", "Turning on the contrary" or quotes from movies and mythical songs.Finally don't forget to quote the discovery in this movie which has proved to be one of the most sought after actors in the current Italian cinema, Riccardo Scamarcio, which is simply brilliant in the role of Step "teenage boyfriend that all have wanted to have" and the father of Babi as counterpoint and glorious moments of companionship and inter-generational understanding.DATA on the película:fecha of Italy release: 12 March 2004No has been dubbed into Spanish or released in our country.They made a musical due to the success of the book and the film |
2,711 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2009 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Los Abandonados | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A horror film with all the pictures of the album of stickers of the horror films... Even so: visible, discreetly entertaining, very well done, fantastically photographed... | I critique of the abandoned house poetaUn, doors that creak, dolls with a perversely trapping eye, rotten wood, mist in the Woods, the ghosts of the past, the relentless fate who returns to collect its debt, gloomy corridors that amplify the breath of evil, has been ever at Disneyland?II the critique of the film buff not overly agradadoCompetente in its purely technical aspect, simple in its argumentative proposal and, above all, very richly photographed, abandoned may have been the year horror film or the film of this century. At least, made in Spain, although the credits we apabullen with Czech names, búlgares, Russians and it is possible that up to Ukrainians. Who runs is our compatriot, but we're not here to raise the flag and sing the virtues of national products with the shrinking hand on the chest. For that we have programs on television that they still grip the sentimentality and nostalgia and emit Cifesa pestiños and vacuos in love with the Riviera Gigolo folk melodramas, but perhaps I'm going of the matter. Iba by the homeland: the abandoned seems otherwise, an invention foreign or extranjerizante. Good or bad? Fright da: goose bumps across the dark corridors and there are screaming in the room. Who gives more? Then there is the strictly film component: hence Cerdá complies, but we have no awareness that we are witnessing something new. Clichés, again repensados cliches, cliches sieved by the funnel of talent, although clichés within. (Iii) critique of the fan to the géneroQue don't need a libretto of dialogues to the Ivory: Cerdá needs few elements to create unhealthy atmosphere and deliver to the respectable a tape of the highest quality that does not disappoint the true genre fan. Tired as we are of American pastiches where premium flavored gore or al gore decisively crushed by the membrane of the tweeter of a loudspeaker in a concert of Linkin Park. The abandoned is an exceptional demonstration of narrative verve: the two protagonists, that shine at extreme altitudes, copan almost all meters of bovine. The ghosts, the inevitable, not abuse of framing and no (fortunately) children, but the spirit of two of them (not destripemos nothing) pulule by desvencijados furniture of the House, which is one main character. Isn't a masterpiece as The shining of my beloved Kubrick (allow me the anglophile detail: I have today been Recalling my summers of phonetics and dramaturgy type Guinness), but suggests that this author we rejoice with works in the future more daring, with milestones in the bibliography of the horror genre.IV critique of the film lover recalcitranteCaso that this infumable neuronal tracheostomy photographer had caught pneumonia double three days before starting to record, would have a surplus concatenation of scares that do not lead anywhere. As the man went to work, we have a crappy boutique, one of those movies that we get from the video store and call a few chums to lower stress and desparcharnos to taste a few litres of malta and hops with panchitos and French fries non-stop. We left the usual scenographic framework: now we are not in Kentucky or in Wichita Falls, the deep America so enchanted with itself and with its capitalist ghosts barque. The director of foreign has sought an idyllic boscosidad Ukrainian or Hungarian or Bulgarian. I do not know and nor do I care the least. My brain feeds on other vitamins: they left for teenagers with acne in the lack of scruples and a brain yet to be regulated. Had only missed three yo0o0o of good breast perimeter (silicone, not create) to liven up the yawns of the espectadores-macho and (modern times) some convinced and smugly fémina of his sexual orientation. I now lame Murnau Nosferatu and I sew the wounds. I do not chillaré. Not endure me longer neighbors these critical angry rants. V the critical old crípticaMuñecas that mean memories, a crazy truck driver that has not been read to Panero, a mansion which prendarían good fetishists of the Hammer, little more than a hundred minutes of kangaroos jumping over the gut of a broker of feelings.I saw the criticism of the has never written a críticaEsto is an American who comes to Moscow, I think that Moscow is to collect an inheritance which turns out to be a home field or forest which then spend a few terrible things and meets a family who did not know at the end. The two, before the end, go through trouble and more trouble until that finally cease to pass distress because they loaded. At the end of the projection, left the cinema with my softer noble parts completely encogidas and with the feeling that when I would like to spoil the evening to some undesirable would not have any qualms in recommending this movie has scenes of impact. Thus, it says no?VII the critique of the merengueCuatro fan goals he has got Real Madrid to Spanish tonight and that the Spanish has got three. Three great goals of Pandiani Rifle, but my Madrid not daunted and knows getting up from the ground in very fallen seems. Just missing that morning click the neighbouring Catalans and then there are, dear love, path of another League. And gave to this already the away when we were in November. Before the football I saw the abandoned. Do not leave David Beckham or Roberto Carlos, but posts to one of them to make a piece of paper because I prefer the defence Brazilian, which gives more impression in a dark hallway. Ah, if to a horror movie you take away the music is as if to the Bernabéu you take away the grass. |
2,712 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3051 | José A. Peig | El Espejo (Zerkalo) | 5 | 5 | muchocine | As a work of art is indisputable. Although it is possible that the poetics of Tarkovsky not is the most adequate to express a Mystic of the image, at least has tried an approach to the phenomenon. | Tarkovsky introduces an enlightening prologue, in which we are witnessing the amazing healing by hypnosis, a stammering boy. Often, the viewer of this film has been somewhat baffled by the abruptly and the lack of relationship with the rest of the story that, apparently, characterize such a sequence. Although nothing further from the truth, that little that we ask minimally by the meaning of this passage, we will discover without difficulty some what healing by hypnosis shown in him we want to indicate is, above all, the willingness to speak clearly, openly of any kind, the director and its main character. Recovery, indeed, «smooth speech» by the aforementioned boy represents the final confirmation of Tarkovsky that is willing to reveal his interiority, to encourage; In short, to exorcise those ghosts, memories and other concerns that have been growing in it for many years. (Excerpt from the study prepared by Pedro A..) Cross Sánchez) the eccentric Russian filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky obliges us to reflection on the film in relation to human consciousness and the facet of the artist of a model author film images, and certainly questionable, despite the artistic bravery and courage that Tarkovsky created a Visual compositions more disruptive and disconcerting in the history of the seventh art. We are open to all kinds of interpretations and evaluations on the film that we are now discussing, from qualified artificial Wanderer and pretentious to say it is the top of the film understood as the transcendental art (the most momentous of all) for which ones allow us to represent life or, according to the own Tarkovsky in images and words, the only art that we can "sculpting in time". The mirror not tells a story, is intended to be a reflection of a State of being that it flows over time. The State, therefore, contains many States of the spirit according to the images subject to the intuition of the author. The traditional narrative logic imposes linear time structure and actions with the aim of offering a coherent and understandable product in its entirety. When Tarkovsky linking images and seemingly disjointed sequences, what you are doing is forcing the Viewer to be at another level of understanding, more risky yet, in another State of being different to that required in a conventional narrative, (with which we have that is the own spectator who must should) "become" the work envisaged. Because of this, the film has no significance any more than within an intimate, transcendent, hidden to the vast majority of the public, that this is not a product, is, in itself, a State of consciousness. Man is alone and isolated in that each of us are part of a unique phenomenon and a unique way of perceiving the world and ourselves. Art emerges as a need to break the isolation which contains the uniqueness of the individual and makes it can not leave itself, such as fear and insecurity represented in the stuttering boy. The art, therefore, is the Act of communication by which we build a bridge between the self (the filmmaker) and others (spectators), we universalizamos and share a piece of intimate truth by the mere joy of doing so, because it involves transcending the State of loneliness. Tarkovsky wants his film to be a reflection of himself, a mirror in which to recognize and in which the public can understand him. A communicative miracle that cannot be realized through the conventional channels of communication. For this reason, we insist, there is art, which can be defined as the voice of the universal transmitted through creativity codes that allow "translate" - through the sign and symbol - idiosyncratic phenomena to a representation that invoke the essence common to all human beings, which requires an immediate and emotional apprehension. The problem is that Tarkovsky is one Mystic rather than a filmmaker, and is possible that the language of cinema beyond limits of which cannot represent it with adequate accuracy all the strength and accuracy of a mystical vision. In that case, the only way out is to renew and reinvent the language of cinema, and a discussion on which there still is no response in the various theories of aesthetics and the semiology of the film would be opened at this point. Therefore, to continue the debate, until then the critic only film touches him optimize the understanding of the work. According to Tarkovsky, the reality of life is too complex and cannot be a faithful representation (vivid imagery) if we use narrative and conventional codes. Life is perceived from la mirada, passing by the emotion and reaching the spirit, where charged full meaning. The meaning of a film meets more intuitive construction that a concept prefixed with treachery. Tarkovsky doesn't want to display images to convey a concept, wants the Viewer to live in images that become part of the meaning and the creation. We set ourselves the following question: being true that the ambiguity and polysemy of all the framework of sequences evokes a mystery, something as indefinable, inexpressible, sometimes specifically, in other elusive, as life in time and memory, are really the human phenomenon of life only can be represented in all its truth and glory through the poetic suggested by Tarkovsky?. If buceáramos in the history of the classic film akin to conventional narrative schemes, we would be a handful of works that manage to represent a piece of truth with clarity and strength required from a purely artisanal work (Murneau, John Ford, John Huston, Elia Kazan, etc, etc). But of course, it is a problem of intentions and radically opposing conceptions. Classical narrative, daughter of Homer, formulated a scheme of life in its most worthy parts and better define the essential human attributes. The expression of Tarkovsky is the Mystic of the ineffable, puts the humán in time making humán and time the same State of the universe represented. With this, we come to conclude that the author inevitably condemned his work to stay within a "elitist", without involving a serious says to his art to his effort to try to make universally unproblematically what is non-transferable part of his being. And idealists always deserve recognition and applause. In any case, the film material consists of a thread very clear, as it is the figure of the mother in his conversations with the spouse, which gives rise to an interesting dialectic on the identity and the conflict involving the family. The mother is the epicenter of the flow of memories and the leitmotif of departure and arrival. For that that "the image that opens the story and the image that closes define the meaning of the creation", ultimately, find a feature that makes it more conventional. And also, it makes it better. Read another extract from the text of Pedro a. Cruz Sánchez, which explains it very well and offers an interesting interpretation: arrived at this point, and with the maximum important certainty that "the present is only a projection of the past sunset manifesto by memory", is forced to ask: does this - memory - is a comforting earner of happiness or?do, on the contrary, its exercise is achieved only suffering, pain? Question, although somewhat some mode of this primordial question deserves an answer developed due carefully, that, indeed, Alexei, memory and the search for itself that it allows you to search anxiously happiness. In fact, in the foreground of the film, after the ubiquitous prologue of the Stammerer, a camera movement brings us the figure of the mother - sitting on a fence while waiting for her husband--for once to its height, continue his career forward and die in a full picture of the nature. Or what saying that, with this care and master level, Tarkovsky has tried to leave clara, already from the outset, the «madre-naturaleza» identification, based on the correspondence of its main attributes; in other words, «juventud-eternidad». Through them we are offered a contemplation of life as 'event without end', typical of a period as children, in which the consciousness of death isn't being born still and, therefore, each element in the world is apprehended as enduring and full. The mother, consequently, and within the iconography of the mirror has to be inferred as the representative of this world of children, conceived as a stage of life characterized by the idea of the eternal and the happiness. Now however, this joyful youth that the mother, this interpretation of life as an incorruptible and perennial value, makes gala cannot last, unfortunately, forever. And the proof we have in a scene which took place at the end of the film in which we see how a warm and sensual movement of camera travels the luminous home of the grandparents of the protagonist, to finish in a window that you can watch the now elderly mother with her two small children. It can be seen, therefore, the matching of two moments spaced over the course of the narrative, that while the first anyone - the madre-joven-in the window to wield the power of the gaze, in the second, which previously acted as "vital and eternal subject", it has now become «decrepit and deadly object». And - it seems say Tarkovsky - who looks and comprises remains young, but who loses this power and happens to be seen, just die. Finally, given that the mirror is a film that breaks with the usual schemes, there is no sense qualify on the basis of theoretical formulations on what a movie should or should not be, what have left you, what is missing, etc. As a work of art is indisputable for the reasons outlined above. Although it is possible that the poetics of Tarkovsky is not the most appropriate to express a Mystic of the image (that is something that only can be verified or refuted by the evolution and the history of the cinema), has at least tried an approach to the phenomenon, and this is confirmed by the witness to millions of viewers who have seen the movie and have felt the time of remembrance. |
2,713 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/475 | Jesus Lens | Salvador | 3 | 5 | muchocine | ¡Que viva melodrama that manages to excite and transmit feelings to the Viewer, which take you a pinch and shakes it the bowels, that makes you feel, think, discuss, get angry, angry is and interested stakeholders in a period of our history. | A premonitory phrase concludes the latest film by Manuel Huerga. More or less he goes on to say that "the case of Salvador has been politicized to Spanish society, it is not just in this country".Too bad that now, newly released the film, while students have class and doing adequate time to drop by the film, the majority of viewers of "Salvador" already comb gray hair. Because it is a film that all this chavalería hedonistic and depoliticized should not see.Salvador Puig Antich was a young Catalan who, in the aftermath of the Franco regime, he moved on to direct action and took part in robbery armed to be convinced of that, as well as contribute to the precipitation of the Francoist regime, the intellectual vanguard of Spain should collaborate to bring a total and radical new State.But the dreams of Salvador were not met and after a chaotic detention, with dead of through, was locked in the model of Barcelona, tried by a military Tribunal and ratified the sentence by the Supreme, executed at dawn on March 2, 1974, through the sinister garrote vil.And all of that is what tells Manuel Huerga, through a flexible and dynamic style, but at the same time, discursive and inquisitive. Without judging them, the film tells us the reasons that led Salvador to go into hiding. Without fanfare, but with great effectiveness, it shows the robberies, arrests and those beatings that the greys gave the young demonstrators calling for democracy in the streets. Without squeaking, we are witnessing the stories of love and heartbreak of Salvador, with their girlfriends and their families.And, later, the prison. What is more criticizing of the film around the blogosphere is that Manuel Huerga has abused melodramatic elements to tell the final part of the story, including execution. I will say only that, coming last of Baeza Friday, Juanma told us to Sacai and to me that has stuck to March 2 of 74 as one of the most bitter days of his life, recalling the death of Salvador. SACAI had not heard, by no means the end of Puig Antich and while we passed box office, told me that I would have preferred not to know how the story ended before seeing the film, by that of intrigue, enigma and surprise.However, when the scaffold appears on screen, the eyes began to inundár him with tears and, while the executioner conformed the tack of death to the neck of Salvador before to turn the screw, I cried to mucus tendido.¿Melodrama? because living melodrama that manages to excite and transmit feelings to the Viewer, which take you a pinch and shakes it the bowels!that makes you feel, think, discuss, get angry, angry is and interested stakeholders in a period of our history that films like "Salvador", rescued from unfair oblivion in which have been mired! |
2,714 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2812 | Kiko de España | Me bebo tu sangre | 5 | 5 | muchocine | It has now become a classic of those I have to teach visitors, so great that it will cost me stay with a single sentence, but I think that I have: "Forgive her, know not what you do, it is silent". Anthology. | Endless tears fell on my face last night watching this jewel of the gore of Z series. A group of hippies worshipers of Satan reaches of abandoned quasi pueblucho hundred by hundred Yankee where they violate and hit a girl and become a House squatters. (Small, fat, clumsy and small) brother of the girl offered then a few cakes of meat infected with rabies (blood you brought to a dead rabid dog) and Mount of God. Full of hilarious details, like friendship and subsequent romance of the initial one of his attackers victim (that most nice girl, it forgives everything, even the violation), or some currelas pulling machete with rabies blood infected by have been brushed all to the same bitch hippie. White caimans and music garage-surf to the attacks, a masterpiece full of situations hilarious almost all by the fucking boy, especially when "through" the door of the barn and its reaction to discovering his grandfather impale, worthy of Ed Wood himself. The truth is that it has become now a classic of those I have to teach visitors, so great that it will cost me stay with a single sentence, but I think that I have: "Forgive her, know not what you do, it is silent". Anthology. It is one of my favorites. |
2,715 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/381 | Caty | Silent Hill | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Another new fiasco in the conduct of a video game to the big screen | The day I found out, makes some years, who were going to make a film about the famous video game "Silent Hill" series have to confess something made me extremely alert: saga being that one of my favorites, with four games to everyone better and with a philosophy which had nothing to envy to many books or films, had the strange feeling of being before a new fiasco in the attempt once (up to exit something mildly decent) to try to bring a video game to the big screen. He spent with two deliveries of Resident Evil made for showcasing the "actress" Mila Jovovich, and looking backwards, with the infumables "Street Fighter", "Mario Bros", not to mention of course those monsters called "Mortal Kombat" or "Alone in the Dark". Curiously, these films come from games with reputed quality, anyone who knows a little bit about the consolero scene will know that they are renowned titles. But my friend, in films since then, are another story. Perhaps, the only honorable exception is "Final Fantasy", but of course, that saves this title is precisely it isn't based on even one only 12 games, and I think there was merit to save at least the muebles(mi_cuerpo_se_convulsiona_ael_saber_que_se_va_a_adaptar_tambien_"Metal_Gear_Solid"). On that basis, in my total and absolute subjectivity when speaking of the latest film from Christophe Gans(ael_que_tengo_algo_estigmatizado_,no,_no_me_gustó_nada_"El_pacto_de_los_lobos"), I am to talk about the film itself. Although, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, the director did not give me much confidence, was not the case the name of screenwriter Roger Avary, co-creator of one of the undoubtedly most brilliant scripts in the history of the seventh art: Pulp Fiction, always correct (although not brilliant) Sean Bean and the fantastic musical work carried out by Akira Yamaoka(que_lleva_la_música_de_los_juegos_directamente_a_la_pantalla), I thought "what the hell, let's give it a vote of confidence to this". Basically the movie takes more or less approximate based the plot of the first game though it mixes concepts of all of them, in which a mother (Rose, played by Radha Mitchell) comes to Silent Hill, the people that his daughter not to appoint in dreams, hoping to find answers to certain strange behavior of his daughter. Once at the entrance of the village, everything seems to shift and Rose's car lost control, leaving our unconscious protagonist.When he awakes, his daughter Sharon has disappeared, what comes out of the vehicle and goes walking towards the town, the expectation of what you can find. Silent Hill, on the other hand, is totally deserted, and a sort of mist covers the people unless you can see much around. From this moment and broadly, the argument stays interesting, to the expectation of what might happen, and when it happens, one is surprised one of the few successes of the film: the good work in shaping the strange creatures that populate the city, so it could be argued that the first half of the film seems pretty decent. Thereafter, the argument falls sharply to making an excellent idea - that of the first game, which if had been such that the screen would have been a pitch - becomes a hodgepodge of ideas, in the poor attempt to condense the incondensable: 4 totally different arguments each other into one. So you do an idea, it is as if we condensáramos throughout the Star Wars saga in one tape drive (that would be there?) (Nothing good, safe). I strongly recommend that if you want to and can, will you give an opportunity to the games, they have nothing to do with the tape and are small works of art. Perhaps people who not know anything games can minimally interested, but even so I am afraid that do not get nor approved. |
2,716 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/125 | Iñigo | Destino final 3 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The final blunder? | When one pays one entry for the film (with all that entails today), at least will meet a minimum entertainment. As superfluous and banal to be. But there are times the past years too, in which one receives the slap of reality more sad and hyperbolic. "Final Destination 3" is one of the products that easily us closer to the more precise definition of "crappy". What is robbed in the film at least helps us to graphically recreate the definitions of the Real Academia Española. here, until the divertimento hides his head out of shame to be recognized. Cannot be extended on this film criticism, since there's nothing to mention, and far less positive. Except the purely aesthetic and dramatic, aspect in which evidence its high budget (what self-worshiping brain could waste so much money by depriving us unfairly the possibility of investing in much more interesting projects and, above all, intelligent?), the rest is absolutely bland and near with stupidity.We have the Group of topically contemporary American teenagers (sometimes not so much), the hormonados and guaperas that we see in all movies of this ilk. That Yes, now with a little more variety, certainly divided between wealthy "snobs", select portion of the more purely elitist society, and "macarras". Or, rather, "posh macarro".We take a blender, join the protagonists of the plane crash with the highway accident aderezamos the ideas of the first with the brutality of the seconds and obtain the groundbreaking characters of the roller coaster. Only that here is scrunch less the brains and not built up ultra-inteligentes and elaborate theories that made fellow of previous deliveries to mock death (who was death to spend so tronchante awhile at the expense of the gentecilla!).It seems that the film wanted to be more realistic and more truthfully portray flat and simple society in the country. The film is a turn of the screw and a copy of all the elements of the two previous installments. And if they were dispensable, the third left into something purely absurd and irrelevant. Does not have the allure of "novel" (if that is you could call as well) of the first, or wild brutality and "gore" of accidents of the second, which satisfied the staunchest fans of the more morbid and violently attractive Gallery.It is for more inri, a smoothing compendium of both and nothing risky.That Yes, some accidents, without being as spectacular or wild as the second installment, satisfied that the followers of the free. But in this film until it is reduced to moments. And leads us, as their long-awaited end to a new situation of "déjà vu" and intuition of what is going to happen. The only scene that can be defined as "idea".One arises if the film degenerates to movies like this and how, should withdrawing is him to the same definition of "seventh art". At least films such as "3 Final destination" should not include in this concept. Fortunately, we still have puffs of air that allow us to breathe and enjoy the true meaning of the celluloid. Although increasingly they are diluted more and more. They say that hope is the last thing that is lost, by very bleak to be the situation. Let us hope that we should not declare a still State of alarm.A explanatory critique is not necessary in relation to what you atienes to see a movie of such characteristics. I think that the good entendedores (come on, which read simply) to see the poster already know what is inside. That Yes, never wrong come a warning that, as tobacco and similar drugs, seriously damages our health. But everyone is responsible for their actions, and if you want to enter the film leaving the encephalic mass in the tail of the box office, the truth is that it is his perfect right. Your doctor, later, are in this respect.His collection in our country, almost analogous to the taquillazo on the other side of the pond, leaving into question our supposed progress in certain aspects and demonstrates the great similarity we have cited quadrupedal ancestral peer.It is, avoiding generalised (if at this stage that is possible in the world of cinema, by the paths taken and majority percentages you have purchased), what gives us the passage of time and the establishment of new generations. We do not lose more time. It does not deserve. Simply let us give thanks James Wong by return to the first delivery address and clarify that theirs is not a coincidence and is an expert in graphic definitions.Definition of "crappy" by the RAE: "Badly done, disorderly or tasteless thing". Let's go by placing another image of a film to his side. |
2,717 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1454 | Oscar Cantero | Manuale D'Amore 2 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Mediocrity along four "stories" which are intended to cover much more than it really can. | Giovanni Veronesi returns to the fray with a new installment of his Manuale D´amore. On this occasion, and after the excellent results harvested for the first part, there is a most famous cast, in which repeated Carlo Verdone and they appear as dazzling beauties female Monica Bellucci and an Elsa Pataky still trying to look like an actress and that at times get even. This second Manuale uses the formula of having several (four in this case) different and independent stories. This is a method that I never liked because I think, one of the highest virtues of a film is having a continuity in the argument and that the connection between their different tramas and subtramas is, the less acceptable. Grosso modo, the first story is about the dazzling love that emerges from a rugged to your physiotherapist; the second is of a young italoespanyola which returns to Rome to present his son to his father; the third, a gay couple; and the fourth on a marriage that goes to a clinic of artificial insemination. Four "comic" compressed in a little less than two hours, although it is not give to much more. The interpretations are correct, especially that of a Monica Bellucci which our Elsa Pataky may have learned much. Appreciated, that Yes, the air of European, so different comedy on the tempos and the ways of the typical americanada. In any case, and having a long week of Carnival, wouldn't I which I mess in a movie theater to see this movie. But of course, that if the situation requires pasteleo, the occasion the paint it bald. |
2,718 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1668 | Matías Cobo | Tristram Shandy | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A story metadiscoursive which is sceptical about the crazy world of the film and the vicissitudes facing those involved in a shooting | ** I have to confess that did not expect me such an outburst of astonishing Winterbottom humor before seeing your cock & bull story (story of a cock and a Bull). Weeks ago I had seen a film of his, code 46, halfway between science fiction and romantic drama that left me quite indifferent. And before this wacky comedy, presented in competition in San Sebastian, the director had also premiered here 9 songs, a drama of high erotic content. This Copernican shift of gender emphasizes the unquestionable ability of the British to move a record to another. In this case, I think that Yes it has initialled a round film to merge in a same script adaptation of inadaptable novel, the life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, and a history metadiscoursive which ironically on the crazy world of cinema and the vicissitudes facing those involved in a shooting.The first thirty minutes pass at a frenetic pace from an absurd dialogue in which the two protagonists chatting on the "no whiteness" of teeth of one of them. Then they leave the makeup room and both begin to incarnate the roles of the film roll: the adaptation of the inclasificlable and mocking novel by Laurence Sterne. At the time roll, Steve Coogan plays himself, turns to the camera and gives his opinion on how children embody her character, Tristam Shandy, during childhood. It is the most comical see him criticise the performance of one of them when it recreates the moment in which Shandy caught the penis with a window. "Looks, because I believe that it should not scream, seems forced;" "I think that it should do it another way?" Or more hilarious and surreal is the endless labor which will be born Shandy, in which the mother is about to burst while the men of the House, quietly, chatting about battles of the past to the waiting to arrive the doctor with a forceps for delivery; medical gadget will come but, given improved little that was to 18th century, it will be marked Shandy of for life with an aquiline nose.After the rapid start, the pace normalizes without losing the comical situations lived in a chaotic film. Shows the usual vanities rivalry that exists between actors and, at the time, producers, writers and actors are saying about films or actors who they like or dislike. Here, Winterbottom dispatches to taste with some colleagues (the dig to the most commercial American cinema is evident) and also praises to their favorites. Producers, as is often standard, put into question the waste of money for certain scenes, while actors and directors to defend his stance to preserve the artistic result.And although they stay in expensive hotels and earn enough money, actors, as happens to the great comedian Steve Coogan, also spend their small potholes, unsafe and fearful of its capabilities at times, and malsanamente envious with alien success and the compliment to the partner/rival. In addition, as his endless immaturity led them to commit some other sexual peccadillo, must pay certain easements to the press to bury such lapses. And more inri, in an intense day where these avatars are mixed with calls of the agent by proposing new work, barely can meet its duties as a good father and meet his partner in bed. In short, a chaotic life of which screenwriter Martin Hardy has managed to get an original comedy seasoned with the typical British phlegm.But Winterbottom, who did not want to be so cruel, took pity on a few characters who has not shown invariably capricious or worrywarts. It also left them to express a more humane and warm part that does not usually appear when the navel of one captures life itself. Although, for artists and people from the show, perhaps is them can forgive a certain excess of ego for the sake of a profession as escrutada and subject constantly to the minds of the public.At the end of the film, our actors, writers, producers, actors and the director who had adapted the life of Tristram Shandy, witness a first screening of the film in a small room. They seem not very satisfied with the result, but the two protagonists, oblivious to the seen tostón, return to the lelo and to bite each other retaking the absurd and comic dialogue of the principle. The comedy of Winterbotton does not end or in the opening credits; the immaturity of the actors and their crazy secure lives that will also continue beyond The End. ** criticism originally published in elojocritico.net 12/17/05, after its screening at the San Sebastian Film Festival of that year. |
2,719 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2800 | Tyler | Death Proof | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Cinema can die calm after this movie, a true classic film. The movies are made to make things as well. Anyone who wants to see that is it for the film, see Death Proof. cinema is pure. | The film is a collective experience. Or at least that is thought despite the appearance of videos and DVD's. You get in a room with a lot of people that no0 know and share, want it or not, same experience. Because that is the film. And what you see, unlike books, happening at the same time. The screen is a window to the same time in which you live, there are flasbacks and sketches of that kind or not. Lately happens much managers come in the film something more than it is. The film is defined from long ago, and there is no way to override it, it is what it is, and segurá so until his death. Tarantino is, possibly, along with Clint Eastwood and Silvester Stallone the last really classic cinema filmmaker. The film is something that should produce a physical rather than emotional reaction in the Viewer. The film is more a way of conveying feelings emotions. The film is not an internal experience, it is external to the contrary to the literature. The film is a less pure artificial experience to rather than, for example, the theatre, but not so.It is not time to redefine the cinema, it is time to glorify it, do with it what to do with him.Quentin Tarantino is the person that has possibly been more movies in history. Someone who loves film more than all of us together, someone who understands it better than anyone else alive.DEATH PROOF is pure cinema of truth. Is film that must be made and does not, it is an experience physical for the senses that gets you in a career of kinetic movement on board car movies that some may have forgotten but that Tarantino handles that I know what they are and that movies come.From the outset breathe film, film drunk. All levels are film, the entire movement and history. Because not just any story is film, and this is. The movie tricks you, something also for which the film is made. Cinema should not be sincere, the film is just the opposite. Cinema should take the hair but do not think that you are stupid. DEATH PROOF makes you believe one thing to then show you another. Makes you believe that someone is the main character (or characters) to then change the tables and tell you that not. All within a logical narrative perfectly built and taken.Tarantino looks to cinema to rediscover us film that truly is. It may be, as I said it in my review on PLANET TERROR, the only movie "tribute" of Tarantino. Here in addition to steal and recycle, it pays homage to cars. All the players cars, are also; they come from some classic: from BULLIT point-to-point límite:cero and his driver Kowalsky. Stuntman Mike's car has the duck Kris Kristoferson in CONVOY (Sam Peckimpah), one of the best movies that exist and the least valued.Stuntman Mike is facing its objectives, chosen randomly among the girls you see in any of his travels of two acts. It shows it as someone that does this from time to time. We see the bastard that can be, and have not gotten to then put it in a situation in which him, begins to be desired. They are two acts, such as the movies by Kubrick, prfectamente balanced so that it is not arritmico, so will again become film and his movie not to smell like stupid experiment, because Tarantino is filmmaker.The cast is the host. We return to retrieve Kurt Russell that we we, rescue in New York and blow in little China. An actor that can give much more of what they allow and here shows that it can be as good as Michael Parks and Michael Parks can be as good as Al Pacino or Robert de Niro.Michael Parks, actor educated at American 70 especially TV, is an interpreted subvaloradísimo and has demonstrated much so not to call more. It is terrific, and returns to Earl McGraw, as already it was open until the dawn, KILL BILL or PLANET TERROR. And it seems that it has interpreted at the same time, because it is exactly the same as when it did open up the dawn, more than 10 years ago. It clashes nothing.The girls are perfect, and each fits into its role as Madonna conceded in his suit of leather of FOUR ROOMS, perfectly. Girls normal roles of normal girls. Talking about like normal girls and normal subjects. Nothing of artificialismos in a part of the movie that asks it, girls normal ansolutamente.Tarantino plays Warren, the bartender, a role which seems an updated versiçon of the roles of barman did Karl Malden. Cameos for his colleague Eli Roth and the sobris of Rodriguez. DEATH PROOF is a fully cinematic experience that goes at full speed, and that you want to see it more than three times. This is pure cinema, of truth, of that which invented it in the film. You enter and upload to a film that you can not resist you as a viewer, a film that makes you think that all the movies should be like this, with this unpretentious spirit, only the give to the public a film.Cinema has forgotten that cinema should thus be cinematographic experiences supported by principles that are running in the history of cinema for years, and many film rejects saying that the film should be more original and reinvent on symbolism and ideas more committed (see: Medem, Lars Von Trier and other peña no idea of which is to make movies) DEATH PROOF is a movie that reminds us that it is cinemaa movie with which we enjoy as I enjoyed the film before, when is towards truth. The film may die quiet if you want after a film with its quality. Absolutely perfect. Maybe that Tarantino is one of the best filmmakers in the history, which is why we are fortunate to be alive when he is. Within much we will talk of him as a genius, and we as the fortunate ones to have enjoyed living.Again and again there is that see is movie and realize that the film is this. Enjoy authentic which want to pay to see. |
2,720 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/850 | Pablo López | El camino de los ingleses | 3 | 5 | muchocine | To be a very personal project he recreates too in some passages and scenes that give a slower pace than it should to the film. | Well, I tell you. In regards to the film, let me say that I really liked, is a film something risky, courageous, but that if he gets the dot, you can enjoy a lot, with very good music and a photograph. It is very nice, very sad, very sincere, I don't know, to my personally have found me a beautiful story. I already bought the novel by Antonio Soler (which is from Malaga).Antonio flags (pro Malaga) at the address is has ported fairly well, rather than by address itself to this very correct with some very good clarity dots, because to be a very personal project yours too recreates some passages and scenes that give a slower pace than it should to the film.The actors are very well, perhaps the fact that does not see 'My Adorable neighbors' has made me convince Alberto Amarilla as Miguelito Dávila of the 78, but my it seems to me that all do very well, especially Raúl Arévalo, which already at the press conference a couple of journalists assigned Goya revelation of this year. Special mention are the already tanned Juan Diego, Victoria Abril (in a character that I completely subjugates) and one huge Lucius Romero (another Malaga) in the role of the character of Raúl Arévalo grandfather. Fran Perea is another that has a very interesting character, which I would have liked to be developed more, but with this boy playing. better as well.We start now with the two strengths of the film: Antonio Meliveo (Malaga also) has made a score for this film really nice, simple, without too much artifice that gives an air of tranquility and be that long that it did not see in a movie, at any time could imagine the film with another more appropriate music. And choose the Who to put in the soundtrack, has also joined points, lol. Xabi Giménez is another that also is has currado, the director of photography has been able to translate very well, with a lot of beauty what flags wanted to this story, because the picture is really beautiful, even in those particular moments in which requires extra effort.I think that not left me nothing more in the pipeline. Only her, I recommend that you go to the cinema to see, that if it catches you point you can enjoy much, because it is a film which has not ideally see it, but think about it days later.A hug!P.S. Note also the morning the wonderful movie press kit that I spent at the Teatro Cervantes, that happened to be from this moment the most beautiful of my collection (which is not small), no doubt. And how not, this cocktail with your drumstick, his loin sauce, its canapés of cod and vino de la tierra. You have to see how caring for the press! |
2,721 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2930 | Rafa Delgado | Death Proof | 4 | 5 | muchocine | With difference, the worst movie of the short (but intense) Quentin Tarantino as director filmography... but oh!, hopefully the worst movies of the best directors were so enjoyable! | Quentin Tarantino has suffered its first setback as director. You do not alarméis, it is not what it seems. Death Proof is one of the best films of the year, and unparalleled enjoyment, but it is the first film in which the tito low Q a tad than usual level, and committing excesses that the average viewer hardly can endure (for what I have seen in the cinema): he is extra footage. That is the first thing I thought of at the end of the projection. There are too many scenes of dialogue quite thick. Nothing more start, there is already a, and is not of those dialogues, also thick, but digestible, mythical, as those who open Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, but of those who sin, an alarming irrelevance and a pretentiousness that sees the Duster from where Christ lost the hat (as if wanted than any of the frasecitas release the girls protagonists)(, they pass to the history of the celluloid), they last too, and end up causing a considerable tedium; Although you may be something unimportant for the most fanatical of the American director, that they probably aguantarán - with a tad of patience - blissful dialogues until you get good thing really, as enjoyable as Orgasmic.Because Death Proof can err on the side of what I have just said, but we are talking about one of the most fun, entertaining films (ignoring the dialogues of the devil) and gamberras of the year, when not taken too seriously to itself (which is something you should not do you). That is also very "tarantina" (something that wasn't, for example, Kill Bill, being a medley - disgustingly hilarious, everything must be said - of thousand different genres that seeping commercialism on all sides), and it shows in all its frames, in how QT moves the camera in how lives and breathes the film alone. It has, in addition to the best action sequences shot of the year, a thousand details and references, as in every movie Tarantino self-respecting, you must not miss, as well as a few well chosen songs for the scenes of turn (priceless scene between the character of Vanessa Ferlito and specialist Mike erotic bailecito).Kurt Russell, very playful. I liked his performance, although it is not to throw many rockets (what would I see how would be the specialist Mike character - a tad missed, incidentally - played by the actor who had to do so from the outset: Mickey Rourke). The girls, in its point.Basically the argument is simpler that the mechanism of a botijo and why maybe spare you a few minutes of footage, the film seemed to me quite funny but me I had very well, despite its flaws, is what really matters.By far the worst movie of the short (but intense) Filmography of Quentin Tarantino as director. but oh!, hopefully the worst movies of the best directors were so enjoyable!Attention to the details of celluloid wasted expressly for the Grindhouse experience (here mutilated) is more realistic. and this sudden and unexpected The End, simply master of menace that becomes. |
2,722 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1488 | Tito Chinchan | Teléfono rojo volamos hacia Moscú | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Tremendous peliculón of humor and criticism to be rie a historical very critical moment in the history of mankind as it was the cold war. Highly recommended for everyone, especially for those who govern us. | Carries this movie on the shelf within the pack "Stanley Kubrick" not less than five years, but he encouraged me not to see her. The poster the truth that is not very interesting, until he told me my medium Zucchini that was laughing. So with that premise, and given that my career as film critic must be truffled reference to archaic films, me I started to see it with the baby, who will learn dialogues from memory.The film is about a high command of the army, who decides to declare nuclear war the Russians. This launches a signal to all aircraft that have weapons of this type, what compels them to launch their burden on Soviet strategic locations. Locked is based the high command, together with an intermediate charge is to avoid the disaster. On the other hand, the President of the United States Government meets his advisors to resolve the situation, having to deal with the Russian Ambassador and even the President himself.To me the old humor movies tend me to be very childish and I don't finish like. But this has nothing to do, humor that uses is very clever to absurdity. But not only is a tape of humor, if not that shows something very real and alarmantel, how easy that might destroy the world. Just a series of coincidences and raise all mauve. Highly recommended, given that it has not lost too much current, have only changed the "actors" that dominate us.In short, tremendous peliculón of humor and criticism to be rie a historical very critical moment in the history of mankind as it was the cold war. Highly recommended for everyone, especially for those who govern us. |
2,723 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1223 | Yojimbo | La noche de los girasoles | 3 | 5 | muchocine | One of the best I've seen this year and will participate in one of the most disputed sections of the awards Goya. | While a lot Spanish film is burned to fast-forward (in case that you see on dvd), there are exceptions that are worth all the clunkers seen to date. Especially because Excel already a little bit in the middle is a feat.On the night of the sunflowers we see a story from several points of view with protagonists of very mixed and with a less "exotic" geographical setting for a thriller. Carmelo Gómez, Judith Diakhate, Celso Bugallo, Vicente Romero, Manuel Morón and Cesáreo Estébanez are the solid set interpretation that gives face to a tale of misery with effect dominated. How face the fear, revenge, and apathy. And the price that it costs do.A very interesting proposal that sinneth perhaps slow at times, but used to see an interesting script complexity interpretive, argumentative and sees a nice easily.One of the best I've seen this year and will participate in one of the most disputed sections of the awards Goya. Why not the prize will be less Sung, clear. Although I have my favorite: A franco 14 pesetas. |
2,724 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4119 | Jesus David | Viaje a Darjeeling | 2 | 5 | muchocine | If at the end the see, so if you like it or not, you do not say that I have not warned. The film is the kind that housewives or hate them. I like hate it have not been blood and love I leave it for other things, so fu nor fa. | Funny comedy of Wes Anderson, which brings Adrian Brody, Owen Wilson and Jason Schwartzman (health), in a film that seems to trip is nowhere, that lacks only sense and. come on, rarely of balls. Premieres January 4, it would be because the first comedy which premiered in 2008, although I would recommend that you for a laugh, and if still in poster, go to see Hot Fuzz (whose criticism I still have pending). Why, laughter, or grace nor ná de ná. Perhaps I do that I like uncouth humor and not I understand the comic vein of Anderson, but it seems he has made the film for himself and his gafapastas chums. I better tell you a bit of will and already decide you, although I do not think that you draw no conclusion.Before the start of the film issued us a short that starred the character of Jason (I refuse to write his surname again) and Natalie Portman, if the producer to the end not decided to issue the short before the movie so you can search on youtube or similar. You can also see Natalie Portman nude.Which I still continue reading after say it last, say that the film is about a trip he organized three brothers (of blood) to the India, in search of spirituality in their lives, although the trip then take another sense I do not desvelaré to not spoil the grace. for one that has. Although I am not going to be bad, we are at Christmas, the film itself is very entertaining, in addition, Owen Wilson comes out, is the best of the film, the majority of points, and blows, fall therein. Adrian Brody is also correct, but still no consigo quitarme his character in the pianist of the head, which is why I is still difficult to accept his comic side.Then. What is it? I spend the peel to see this movie or I better call a pizza and see the repetition of the 1st new year's Eve special on a Sunday afternoon? Therefore not be I worse. With the mess of Christmas, Kings and others, go to take refuge in the cinema to see this movie isn't a bad option. Indeed it is the only good option of the first batch of releases of 2008. If at the end the see, so if you like it or not, you do not say that I have not warned. The film is the kind that housewives or hate them. I like hate it have not been blood and love I leave it for other things, so fu nor fa. FUA. |
2,725 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3888 | Tito Chinchan | Navajeros | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film about a juvenile delinquent called the Jaro. Not be based on a true story, the end is desboca and takes away too much credibility to the whole. Although it is interesting to see bits and pieces of the early 1980s Spanish society. | Director: Eloy's Church. duration: hour and half cut.Release date: October 6, 1980.Espectadores: 810.160 human beings.Not long ago the worst Spanish actor of all time was Fernando Tejero, the eternal goalkeeper said safely of "Here no hay quien viva". That was until I seen this movie, and I was reminded of "The peak", which Henry San Francisco happens to be the worst actor. You pensaréis I must be alienated, given that you have seen crying to Fernando Tejero, but about Quique San Francisco cries out to heaven. Seriously. Inexpressiveness of his face, and smooth intonation, worse than read, gives this well-deserved award. Congratulations. On the other hand, a day I will found in Madrid the boy with a tremendous jaca, which makes me think that you have other gifts beyond the interpretation.The film is about a juvenile delinquent called the Jaro. Tells the life of this minor, its relations with the rest of criminals, and as it becomes a small armed pull and theft sector leader.It can divide the movie into two parts, a quite passable first, where we will presenting the Jaro and his friends, and a second where try to put many things in the short time have left them and I think to much lower level. Players have a level low, possibly due to the youth of the same, but dan well the pego (especially when leaving Quique San Francisco, that comparisons are odious). And it is this kind of stories allow bad actors for a hard script with few concessions. It also has a special, since regustillo that many of the scenarios are lugadores where I've been I young (as the Ventilla, all my family is from there) and my attention much.In short, film about a juvenile delinquent called the Jaro. Not be based on a true story, the end is desboca and takes away too much credibility to the whole. Despite this, it is interesting to see bits and pieces of the principles of the 80.Otra of Iglesia.Besitos Eloy Spanish society. |
2,726 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3901 | Francisco Bellón | La Sombra del Cazador | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The shadow of the Hunter is a thriller masked as film of political denunciation, after its bombastic and pretentious appearance not found more than a vulgar history, which are not interested in or excited in the slightest | There are actors that think that its mere presence is enough to give packaging a film beyond film purely. There are interpreters that seem touched by a magic wand, and that you project involving, guarantee project. Although it is much more often the opposite case, there are many actors and actresses that assure the mediocrity of any film in which they participate.Although it seems a paranormal phenomenon, there are actors that seem to be attracted by poor quality projects irrefrenablemente, and Richard Gere is a good example. And that the last Donosti Prize (which under the Festival of San Sebastián has fallen) strives, but there is no way, a mysterious and inexplicable aura of mediocrity surrounds everything he does in recent years. In the shadow of the Hunter, Richard Gere is a seasoned war correspondent to witness the horrors of the war in the Balkans lost live nerves. After the conflict, our more partying reporter returns with the sole intention of capturing one of the most wanted war criminals. What could well have been a history of well constructed and made consistent complaint becomes a runs-runs-that-you-pill without sense. In addition the film is any less honest thing and Richard Shepard is kept key information to understand the reasons for the character of Gere and not the release until well advanced the plot. These blows of effect are characteristic of films empty and contrived, but which at the same time Sin a huge pretentiousness. There is no element that hook to the Viewer, who is also martyred in the presence of Richard Gere and Jesse Eisenberg. Terrence Howard, who hope to see away from Hollywood like this subproducctos is only saved.The shadow of the Hunter is a thriller masked as film of political denunciation, after its bombastic and pretentious appearance not found more than a vulgar history, which are not interested in or excited in the slightest. |
2,727 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2025 | Rafa Ferrer | Premonition (Siete días) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A good idea, in a very bad result. Sandrita, pretty, dedicate yourself to the romantic comedies of those that so much like my wife, because the truth is that in this type of film sobras. | I have almost 20 min. sitting in front of the keyboard to write this criticism, bad is when I feel so, and begin to remolonear, thinking that writing, and is that "Premonition" (not confused with the film of the same name directed by Sam Raimi), is an idea well intended but poorly executed, and is that the opera prima Mennan Yapo, it is rather weaker than one expects to find a priori on screen; I do not know, maybe is that I have so much time thinking about conspiracies "Judeo-Masonic" one when he sees something strange on the screen never think that they will give cat by Hare, for love to take in cats and with those who share life and home for several weeks...But I'm not by the branches, the tape of Sandra Bullock, lacks sense of narrative, and is that, trying to follow a path that already marked tapes "unsorted" as "Memento" or "21 grams", here the only disorder lies in how live the character of "bullock" days, and is that once we learn the rules of the game just the grace of the tapeseparate mention is their tramposidad and little artifice in showing us, again I repeat, an idea embodied in the script was nothing short of brilliant.Bullock makes his character, like Julian Mcmahon little credible (and is that everytime I see this man I remember "The fantastic four" and lose seriously.), to which translate as usual in it, and you join the crusade that not help you nor the mother who gave you birth.It needed a paragraph separately by its end, laughable, little developed and quite helpings, and it is that, (I repeat I), after be throwing meat to the grill during much of the footage, one expects the fireworks at the end, and meets a small firecracker, which tramposamente hidden on screen, just does damage when it explodes.Sandrita, pretty, dedicate yourself to the romantic comedies of those that so much like my wife, because the truth is that in this type of film sobras. |
2,728 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2980 | Tyler | Seven | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A masterpiece by one of the geniuses that we can enjoy those who are of this generation. | Which are those movies that one is you come to mind when speaking of this concept is that of "modern classics"? It is a strange concept with which lovers we are constantly. You can't believe in him or not, but it exists. Many have respectable opinion that a movie should survive for 20 years as a cult movie to become a clésico, others think that there are movies that are born so.In one way or another, the movie which I mean, Seven, is one of those movies that we come to mind. The head. The movie of "the head in the box" for many, in the same way as for other many American History Xfué film "the mouth in the kerb". So many movies of the nineties are the memory, and it's funny. Everyone remembers Seven.David Fincher is that indispensable (along with Quentin Tarantino) director to understand cinema of the 1990s. That of "reinventing" the film is a lie, it is a hoax. Film not reinvents itself; the film is recycled it is copied or is still doing the same. Because the film is defined long ago. So it cannot be said that Fincher, what you can say is that it revived the film. He took a classical script with the cliché of the poli old about to retire and the young and energic poli newcomer to the city, and turned it into a reference title. A cult movie and a masterpiece. Andrew Kevin Walker, which is a magnificent craftsman of the script tanning in the tv series "Stories of the crypt" or movies as "Brainscan"(una_serie_B_fantástica), wrote from a simple idea, seven deadly sins, seven murders. It had relatively recently that "El Silencio de los Coderos" had returned to fashion smart serial killers. A.K.Walker thought it would be a good idea launch this project and try to sell it. The perspective he gave to the script was quite unique in the sense that was much darker and more perverted than any other movie of assassins in series. David Fincher came from fighting with the producers of Jeunet and was desperately looking for a project that vent. Originally Seven not noticed you until arriving at the time that John Doe, the murderer masterfully played by Kevin Spacey, is delivered. Fincher thought: in that movie a serial killer given him?. That was what pushed him to go.Because of course, that can be quite garrafal script failure, but everything has its because, because behind the script for Seven there is another script of the own murderer, which is weaving his history and his crimes so ultimately charged sense.Seven has a nearly perfect script. But it is not. What happens to Seven is the first half something caught with pins in some respects. The action forced at some points in the script to make it as shown, being quite improbable. But the second half is perfect. Round. And if a guióle give an audience a second half like that, the public forgets the bug has been able to see, if esque has seen them. Porue despite having many traps, Seven better than anyone conceals their mistakes. For example, it is a little forced as Somerset (Morgan Freeman) discovers the writing on the stage of gluttony after the refrigerator. Through a few small, tiny, plastiquitos found in the stomach of the unfortunate who forced them to eat until you burst. The detective takes these plastiquitos to the scene of the crime, and in no time discover what are soil, specifically of having moved the fridge. A little improbable, but Hitchcock said that you one, when working the suspense, does not have to be totally plausible, therefore does not have to be a mistake. This also the fact of and discover the House of Doe. Mills (Pitt) and Somerset (Freeman) flock, by the hand of the latter, a seller of confidential information from the FBI, which seems to be that it controls all the books that takes any citizen. I.e., to see if the peña read about Hitler, how build crappy murders or atomic bombs. So they get a list of names, which lead directly to John Doe. This is a very risky resource, because people might not believe it, but as it is something about what we do not know anything, which makes the Governments with our lives, quite extreme licenses are permitted, and in the script conceals very well putting a small comedic conflict between detectives.The development of history it marked the murders, and it is made from the point of view of the detectives, giving us only a perspective of the crimes. We only see another point of view at the end, when talking about John Doe, but we see it from the point of view of the detectives. The only secuendcia that is from the point of view of the murderer, possibly that which occurs in the same House. The House almost, provides the sickly view of the sequence.Fincher opts for a crude and depressing movie. Something very risky, because it is not pleasant to see, not enough to the public nothing in what you feel comfortable. Everything is dirt and rain. Something typical of 1970s, and cinema for a movie in particular Klute, Alan j. Pakula. In which Fincher supported as a reference to tell the story so sickly way. The movie itself does not show much violence, only suggested and not voi to say the that pollada "what our minds can imagine is much stronger," but the tone of the movie makes the suggestion of violence much stronger than violence itself, and above all, the attitude of the people before the same; very well represented by the owner of the puticlú where he died the victim of lust.Photo and mounting and, above all, the Assembly of sound, are master. The hopeless, absolutely brutal, very own Fincher's atmosphere cut you the body. And it is also joined by a secuenci of credits worth millions, something totally brutal, which seems taken from a mondo movie. It really tells you the tone of the movie, and from the beginning you are with the knotted stomach. You do not want to eat when you finish seeing her, you are disgusted to be person. Same as with the fight club.The end better than a zipper closes, is absolutely round. The crimes charged sense, and you feel fatal because, somehow, you understand the murderer. And you no guilt you. You are like him, even being atheo. A masterpiece orchestrated by one of the geniuses that we can enjoy those who are of this generation and who are still alive. |
2,729 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/798 | Caruco | El ilusionista | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Echo less more capacity of disturbance, claw more film. But it is not call pears at del olmo, and Yes to make us spend almost two hours entertaining. | Mystery, magic and romance wrapped in a supernatural halo is that promises "The illusionist". Its cast is also very attractive: Edward Norton, Jessica Biel and Paul Giamatti. Ummmm!The era in which it is set, that Vienna from entresiglos in 1900, is still some fascination. And more as the setting for a story (another more this year, following "The girl in the water", "Palindromes", "El laberinto del fauno"?), inspired by the pen or computer of a Pulitzer Prize, Steven Millhauser keyboard. More ummmmm!Our charming Prince is not of such rank sinó of humble and rather solo status and booked. It is known as the magician Eisenheim (Edward Norton) and his tricks are so spectacular that it seems that he has allied himself with the same supernatural forces. Now use all their tricks to get to the woman he loves, a lady prohida (Jessica Biel) that belongs to a higher class. And make it rivaled, this Yes, all a Prince (Rufus Sewell). it seems all great! But I'm still hoping something of intrigue that is worth remembering, and footage that is based on a too stretched idea. Film and characters move in a functional manner and on many occasions, why Yes, why it says the script. Or the final outcome is surprising, because it hinted at with ease.Norton and Giamatti what great are!Do it is then when one falls in the mind that the true vocation of the film directed by Neil Burger, forged in the realization of? spots?, is only the entertain and point. Either try to make history in cinema.And "The illusionist" meets its goal, being grateful that no character is actually as good or as bad as it seems, even the OGRE in the form of Prince who plays best Sewell.Lo of the function, without doubt, are actors, especially Edward Norton and Paul Giamatti as the inspector of the police Uhl, a representative of the law who is torn between two duties: the entertain to established power and maintain full in his tenure.Moreover, the romantic plot between the aristocratic Sophie and the plebeian prestigidador continues to follow the more well-trodden outline of "boy meets girl;" "boy loses girl and, already know, waiting boy recovers again the girl." Optical illusions.And I put into question some of the magic tricks that Eisenheim staged were really possible with the verismo, for the time, but in 1900 they were beginning to develop optical illusions which rise the film.Do do the same movie uses the technique of the? autocrhome?, created by the Lumière brothers at the end of the 19th century, whose colouring is smoother, less contrasted and therefore closer to black and white, allowing to provide the photography and the production design of a certain layer of unreality in accordance with the spirit of the film and its setting.Interesting, and further taking into account the story creates expectations with time as the (alleged) occurrences of the hereafter or an exhibition in charge of Eisenheim reminiscent of the legend of Arturo.Pero the staging of Neil Burger continues to be very discreet. Echo less more capacity of disturbance, claw more film. Does but is not call pears at del olmo, and Yes to make us spend almost two hours entertaining, give her for valid, but? |
2,730 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3923 | Andrés Pons | Thriller: A Cruel Picture | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Tarantino was blatantly inspired to Kill Bill in is the b series, a true jewel of the Grindhouse with all its elements. I.e. violence, explicit sex, martial arts, in a universe full of dirt. | Exploitation film vengeance is one of the most recurrent themes, that of female revenge plays an important role in films as desquiciantes as the violence of the sex or COLT 45.Uno of my favorite films of you're characteristics and apparently also of director TARANTINO is THRILLER A CRUEL PICTURE, Swedish production with interpreters that they came directly from the porn and a single director known for being an Assistant to the great INGMAR BERGMAN in a couple of productions.TARANTINO is blatantly inspired to KILL BILL in is the b series, a true jewel of the GRINDHOUSE with all its elements. I.e. violence, sex explicit, martial arts, in a universe full of dirt.The violence of is production is completely dry without artifice or half-hearted, pure evil in all the characters, with moments of pure adrenaline.Maybe the best film of the sub-genre of female vengeance, with an excellent completion, master performances, excellent photography. A masterpiece of the most stark subcine. |
2,731 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1251 | Yojimbo | Buenas noches y buena suerte | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A penalty of film for those who expected a fable for freedom, which by the way, could be applied in our country. | It had preceded trumpeted a lot, very good advertising and comments praising the critical capacity and value that has had the actor to make a film about the witch hunt and a plea for freedom.I regret to say that it has not made a film, he has tried to do two and it has been with a "specimen" of film. And of course, to opt for being a Troubadour has neglected altogether the script, which introduces us to characters that are born from the first frame as heroes, defenders of the truth and honest when they are nothing more than journalists. It is clear that American patriotic sentiment is widespread. They are not only journalists, first they are Patriots.In Europe they have idols as "rebels" like Sarandon and Robbins who are critical of Bush and his policy, like Clooney, but never cease to say that they are Patriots (although saying it only with certain Presidents already do sing their ideology). Patriot is a word in our country is a pestilent and has connotations of past times and is supposed to overcome.Why are the protagonists of this story soon Americans than journalists? and go Patriots and journalists!But Clooney has wanted to highlight that and has opted to pull newspaper library and video library to illustrate his fable about power excessive state, neglecting completely the script without giving life to the characters and ignoring the drama of the situation so that the Viewer could feel terrible at the time.It is a documentary fiction done with a large photograph, David Strathairn powerful but without life and emotion, something very disappointing for those who we expected something similar to the dilemma, another possible example of how power can crush people.In the absence of seeing the movie of Ang Lee and Truman Capote, it is of the most unfair nominations for best film and Best Original Screenplay. A penalty of film for those who expected a fable for freedom, which by the way, could be applied in our country. Guess who has the power and who the truth (something very pretentious respond but is what sells the poster for the film). |
2,732 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3092 | Iñaki Bilbao | Promesas del Este | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A film maja, as I say estimable, possessing very positive elements, as already pointed and some dialogue, but also in a way, if not disappointing itself somewhat unsatisfactory. | Estimable last film of Canadian David Cronenberg, that it felt right to release on this Renciente International Festival of cinema of Donostia 2007.Me'm glad that did so personally you think a creator, lately more classical in the sense of his narrative film, but still with the nasty that you caractiza.After his glorious "A history of violence", for my taste, the best film of the year, Cronenberg us again to show the duality muerte-vida, along with the love-hate, love and respeto-odio, and revenge.And makes it very well from the point of view eminently practical, as they see the tape without breathing easily, always be very entertaining and passing the minutes with incredible ease. And, no, it is not to be very showy in rhythm, because storytelling is quiet, but inexorable towards a do determinant? end, which is in my opinion, the worst thing about the film. A little plausible, little credible end, in addition to ambigüo, which, of itself, you can't be anything bad, but as events happen I can't find you much explanation to the epilogue. Perhaps, it is just that I did not understand, but I believe that it is unconvincing.The performances are good, although Viggo Mortensen, while it gives the role very well, is not that it is very ductile. Always shows the same face (because his character is so stoic) and the same poses. The best are the "minor" characters, but immensely important as the uncle of the protagonist, played by the excellent Polish director Jerzy Skolimovsky.Excelente Howard Shore's soundtrack and the photography of Peter Suschitzky.En summary, a nice film, as I say estimable, possessing very positive elements, as already pointed and some dialogue, but also in a way, if not disappointing, itself somewhat unsatisfactory. Perhaps it is unfair because that, albeit unconsciously, I wanted that outside, at least, as "A history of violence", but the sediment that leaves is a good film, but still room for improvement.At the end of the projection in San Sebastian the public applauded, but without any passion. Ah!, with regard to the violent scenes, will be very commented out the fight in the bathrooms. There do some applauded warmly, above all for the way end (not suitable for sensitive stomachs, notice). |
2,733 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2000 | JLO | Crimen ferpecto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The problem of crime Ferpecto isn't in his steady pace - and fluid - or the characters - all stereotypical-, but that is always the feeling of little strength. | There is something wrong with this comedy by Alex de la Iglesia. Owner of a solid filmography and with its own characteristics (during the triad consisting of the day of the beast (1995), Perdita Durango (1997) and dead of laughter (1999), which made him a specialist in this genre, able to exalt or base "celebrate" the ridiculous human, corrosive, "bizarro" black humor and other powerful.)Crime takes place in a shopping center, far from the recurrent cold and aseptic place, is the place where emerge in living flesh jealousy, the competition at all costs, as also the sex between the protagonists and their following and dire consequences.Rafael - Guillermo Toledo, excellent - is an ambitious materialistic and misogynistic, seller that takes everything to its logical conclusion in wanting to become the head of plant of its section, another clear example of the Gallery of characters "borders" of the director. Power is always present in all his films, both either by leadership, by money or simple excessive ambition. One of the best qualities of the Church, which returns to re-confirmar in this film, is the be a great director of actors. The heterogeneous level of performance - along with the choice of casting - is excellent, even in all secondary. Best sex scene, which gives samples of its cinidad and the timming for comedy, is the one that plays the protagonist couple in dinner at her house: more glowing and bite in his film.The problem of crime Ferpecto isn't in his steady pace - and fluid - or the characters - all stereotypical-, but that is always the feeling of little strength, of a languid exercise almost "taquito" by the director, well as a repetition of style.Its plot is somewhat obvious nor the summation of gags along with references to the films of Buñuel, Hitchcock and Chaplin - the use of the suspense of the surrealism of the film noir, the shopping to closing - manage to get afloat, surmounted by a final weak and too concesivo. Almost of commitment.Both crime Ferpecto and Alex de la Iglesia equal rise the aim then of the failed 800 bullets, albeit only superficially. Directors of weight and with its own characteristics is they always requests a little more and there is nothing wrong with that. Crime is not "ferpecta" or anything, but is what it is. |
2,734 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3550 | Cp | Beowulf | 3 | 5 | muchocine | An epic story, without many turns of script, direct, but why not simple nor boring. With heroic characters, but with all the possible sins. Technically impeccable, although I would have preferred a film in the style of 300. Recommended. | Okay, but ...That was my phrase anything more out of the film. Beowulf is a film that I liked, with quite epic, good characters, a simple story, without too many folds, where interesting thing is to discover each of the characters, their way of acting, his personality, his ideas, and even as they keep changing. In that regard, this quite well, not always must be given forty laps to make it to the script, traps and surprises, and above all, is an epic story. Beowulf is a hero, of course, is not afraid and is facing the bug as necessary, but also this lover of himself and of his legend, and does not lose opportunity to increase it. The other characters are quite archetypal, with intriguing and cowardly Advisor, the lecherous guerrero, the young Queen married the King old and decadent, but all have its history and its background, which makes them attractive.On paper, it is a very good movie, but everything changes when deciding like shooting her. The problem, at least for me, is the style used to shoot her. I have worked as a computer scientist doing 3D, and I like a lot, but even so, I just do not like the style of digitizing the performance by an actor. I prefer the system Final Fantasy based on an actor and do entirely digital or on the contrary, the style 300 of real players in a digital world. This clear that Beowulf achieves a great result, with beautiful scenes, funds and setting very well designed and worked and even the designs of strange beings very spectacular, especially the Dragon and the mother of Grendel, although of course, taking the curves of Angelina JOlie as a basis, already is a good start. But I just do not convince. Often, characters have very rigid faces and their movements not just be fluid. Above all, as said Gatonegro is noted in excess the rigidity of the hands, so much to pick up objects, as in the moments in which the character not used directly, lack them great expressiveness. Much to improve technology exceeds, in details as hair, for example, noted that spending hours in animation not reaches the level of Final Fantasy and its fluidity. This same movie with real actors, the same director, rolling exactly alike and all the effort of design scenarios and funds would have been an absolutely spectacular film.In short: Epic, direct, with characters that reflect another era in his act, well directed and mounted, would have been a film unbeatable, having followed the wake of 300 and place real actors in a world built digitally. Even so, a way of telling a story that hopefully will repeat. |
2,735 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4239 | Ethan | Grupo Salvaje | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Peckinpah will give them a clue of what is approaching, you need only look to play some children at the start of the film... | Grupo Salvaje is a film that has not done but grow with the passage of the years and today can say, without risk to wrong, that it is the masterpiece of Sam Peckinpah and the most representative of the so-called western twilight; Maybe it's because the controversial filmmaker film fit perfectly with the elements that defined the genre. Some of them are as follows:-the characters, eternal adventurers, belong to the Wild West and outside site with the arrival of civilization. They have no other way that fight to death, more than anything because they can't do anything else. Thus films as two men and a destination (Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid of George Roy Hill, 1969) are calcadas in its resolution to Grupo Salvaje. -The players are old cinema glories (Holden, Borgnine, O'Brien, Ryan, "indio" Fernández, etc). It is calling a crepuscular tape. Peckinpah did something similar in duel in the High Sierra, for some the first feature film of this genre. -The "tone" of the film is nostalgic, pessimistic and, above all, violent. The good times have gone; "romanticism" of the western, duels and justified by the absence of law violence no longer exist. Now prima violence by own violence. In Grupo Salvaje "good" are worse than the "bad", such as birds of prey. To highlight the harshness of some sequences Peckinpah used slow and don't think to do so by aesthetics. I think the claim of some critics naive when referring to the scenes of the shootings as if they were a "dance"; what the director intended was to get images from barbarism to remain in our retinas--and in our memory - the maximum time possible. It was a new form of complaint and there is no doubt of the close relationship that exists between what counts in the film and what was living in Viet Nam at the end of the 1960s. The viewer who has not yet seen Grupo Salvaje to be prepared for a new experience. Peckinpah will give them a clue of what is approaching, you need only look to play some children at the start of the film. |
2,736 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3399 | Francisco Bellón | La Zona | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The area you think what to many current films, has an attractive initial approach, but that unfortunately it failed adequately develop. | Since the attacks of September 11, the contemporary society lives in greater or lesser extent, depending on the rulers of each country, immersed in a genuine culture of fear being security paranoia its maximum exponent. And when a society moves almost solely by fear, are exacerbated the injustices can be to commit acts of an unthinkable atrocity in a theoretically developed and advanced society.With the area, Mexican filmmaker Rodrigo Plá performs a metaphor on how the fear of the unknown, fear of insecurity, it can turn ordinary citizens into monsters. That was the intention of the film, but friend Oh, one thing they are intentions that can be extraordinary, and another very different thing is know to translate them properly. There are some approaches to the script from the first instant there is no who is those created, as well as a series of topics and situations very tired, which above not even given a good development. The characters are credible by the extraordinary work of the actors, among them a huge Daniel Giménez Cacho and a disturbing and frightening Carlos Bardem. It should also be noted that the area is well shot, sometimes enjoying great intensity, while in others lapses the pace considerably. The end looks coming from afar and not surprising at all.The area you think what to many current films, has an attractive initial approach, but that unfortunately it failed adequately develop. Most likely it's a too ambitious history for a new director. |
2,737 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2744 | Kiko de España | Primeval | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It is boring as a working day on the day of the feast of the Virgin of the Paloma, has no budget and is quite ridiculous. | Entitled here crocodile: a serial killer, Primeval narrates the events (and still have) place in a remote location in Africa where there is a predator that has killed more than 300 lives. Dominic Purcell, descamisado prota of Prison Break also shines here his Tin chest, so I suppose that it is his idea. On this occasion he plays a reporter gañán in search of the bug. Accompany a girl, Orlando Jones (bet you your life to at least one joke is funny) and Jurgen Prochnow.El case is that at times the crocodile paints less than the monster of The Host and the movie is changing little by little in a political thriller and such, what happens is that it does not because it is boring as a working day on the day of the feast of the Virgin of the PalomaIt has no budget and is quite ridiculous, because if something is clear in this remake of the Anaconda is the crocodile thought and is smarter than the people who want him to hunt.Inspired by a real case. JAWS was better. |
2,738 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4025 | Rafa Ferrer | Beowulf | 2 | 5 | muchocine | New tape by the visionary Zemeckis that even caring for the animation to unexpected places, finally leaves the audience plunged into a very strange feeling as the story told. | For my Robert Zemeckis is a visionary, and is that what Julio Verne has always managed to go a step ahead in this film, to begin with, in the 1980s was bag Pocket travel in time with the excellent "Back to the future" series, then made live humans with cartoons (now see humans in the film coexisting with CGI)in "Who framed Roger Rabbit?" years but later I reflected the loneliness that recently we have seen will Smith in "I am Legend" in his "Castaway" with Tom Hanks, and three years ago (seems to have been yesterday) was pulled out of the manga a technique for filmmaking, using the motion capture that seems to be the future of cinema as we know it todayas graphically imposed, although it is still in its infancy, and has the wonder of shorten shootings in a surprising way, and is everything is added later, in the room of postproduction, and who gave their first blows with "The Polar Express" and that now, with this film that brings us, it seems that little by little they have improved the technique.In this case they have gone over the film in question has been released in 2 ways, both conventional and 3D, curiously all the criticisms and views that I have heard about people who loved them the tape has been by that have seen in 3D, in my case it is not the case, and the conventional way has been to which I have referredtaking a strange reaction and a bittersweet recap.And it is that, "Beowulf" tape regulate where they exist, despite having a roster of those that would delight, first any director, and after any film lover, features not only the voices (typical in a tape of animation) but with the faces of Anthony Hopkins, Angelina Jolie (you can see "pseudodesnuda"), John MalkovichRobin Wright, Alison Lohman, and Ray Winstone, who thanks to the motion capture becomes a young "pipiolo" slob, when he already has about 50 springs.It is true that a tape of this type, action, fantasy, epic; any of the 3 previous qualifiers I worth, one might not expect much more than it is, and not to deceive, or RIP vestments, nor, much less take the hands to the head, if at any time, the result is desired, that the tape it, based on an eponymous Anglo-Saxon epic poem, which was written in old English alliterative verse. 3.182 Verses, it contains much more material than any similar work in your language, and represents approximately 10 per cent of the existing corpus of Anglo-Saxon verse, which do not say I, but wikipedia, to know an egg.And that has been, not only the base, but also the guts and the backbone of a hundred stories, legends and even films (there have Fables as Conan, and even stories of Tolkien and other many writers.), so I don't can be surprised at all that he knows what is going to find at all times, andthough the animation is careful, excellent (much better than in "The Polar Express") and takes you back to those dark times, the film fails to convince all and ends leaving the viewer with a curious sense of apathy and not have come to be 100% in line with the same. |
2,739 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1649 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Pequeña miss sunshine | 4 | 5 | muchocine | I heard that this was a small film and, indeed, has some fine. Although his influence is enormous and its field of action is greater still. Social cinema, film critical, harsh, corrosive, film good-humored in the background. Film which aspires to catch the viewer and ask, once again, get excited. You can still. | Indie: Jesus said be the film that voluntarily deviates from the traditional circuits and brewing with the very clear intention of being independent, not contaminable tics of the majority consumer film. Then little miss Sunshine is not a tape indie, as they sell it, although Sundance endorsing her with their brand. It is independent, paragraph of the traditional circuits and massive commercial pretensions (in the style of Caribbean pirates or Spiderman in any of their deliveries) is his humility, his reluctance by apabullar: there is nothing in the script that might raise the amazement of the audience accommodated in a film of fireworks of fair, platonically shots or indisputable special effects. There is not an easy film and that (well looked) gives a status of rare piece in this world of ours in which everything is conducted through the affordable, easily chewable, but as the tape has participated in the Hollywood Oscars and has entered the ring (say) of industry, it seems that it should be evaluatedcriticized, understood as one movie entertainment family in the style of those listed above, both worthy and the pleasure of this digital scribe.Little Miss Sunshine is a road-movie anthology, happily acid, corrosive in his simple way of showing diseases of a society, the American, too delivered to satisfy delights immediately and convert everything in fast-food fast consumer product, is a hamburger, is a book, is a film. This is a dysfunctional family, which is a fashionable word. The Hoover are the paradigm of the broken family: nobody has the head where it should. There is a teenager between the grunge and the Nietzschean does not speak for imposing discipline (ay if San Juan de la Cruz raise his head), a grandfather pornographer who sniffed heroin in the spare and advised the free love and fornication as a hobby, a father hooked to Sociology light to the Paulo Coelho, a brother-in-law gay fresh out of a suicide attempta girl plump that wants to be miss and a selfless mother, authentic lung of a family destined to burst any minute of the day. Welcome to hell, says the autistic mozalbete at one point in the film.Friendly, acid, perverse, intimate, colloquial: there are many adjectives. The quality, however, most dominant is the optimism, the crucial fact that a road check North, the future. Or a desmantelable van in pure junk not pursue their final destination: the hotel in Redondo Beach, California in which will take place a unique competition, the choice of Miss Sunshine, aberrant contest girls where, at the end, the fabulous outcome, a kind of metaphysical climax in which one reconciles with the goodness of the film occurs, with its holy catharsis. In other words: now that it is not possible to see it in cinema, come to the nearest video store. They have one close. Or one of those impersonal ATMs that eject the dvd as if it were a condom in a night of partying and had one all enfebrecidos instincts.Go. To run. You will not see the best film of the year, but it is (strongly) one of the most fresh, ironic, scathing and, above all, pleasant. |
2,740 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1932 | Alex Largo | Hechizo de luna | 3 | 5 | muchocine | In conclusion, a film that could have given more of if, which back the flight in the last part to the delight of the Viewer. | Okay, if it is not bad. But it has not excited me. Above all the principle. The story is funny, but the first part is very desaprobechada. I am ahead. better let's go by parts.With regard to the work of the director. poor. Especially in the first part. Until that Cher is not going to the Opera director Norman Jewison (surprisingly nominated for an Oscar for this movie) does not begin to "work". And it is that since that time, the film moves from poor to truly entertaining.As for the screenplay (Oscar winner), well, but widely desaprobechado by the director. But if the script had fallen into the hands of anyone else, the film would have gained a lot.Talking about actors, there are three groups: good, Nicholas Cage and the dull. In the first group are all residents of the House of Loretta. In the second group, Nicholas Cage, something less cardboard as we see him lately, but equally bland and apavado.The third group is the fiancé of Loretta and all those who do not fall in any of the first two groups.Cher is which looks better (in fact took the Oscar), and gives us the best character of the tape and the more grateful. But somewhat exaggerated, that me I cannot see Cher doing a better than Meryl Streep role, was also nominated. As regards the distribution that is included in the collective of the third age, great, from the grandfather, until the mother. All stunning.Nicholas Cage offers a not-so-poor, poor performance as which us gives now. More surprising is how sometimes it seems even that changes of expression does will be a slight trace of what you gave an Oscar? There is no great aspects comentables escepto already counted.In conclusion, a film that could have given more of if, which back the flight in the last part to the delight of the Viewer. Even so, the film garnered some very important nominations in the Oscars (6 in total of which won 3), including (surprisingly) the nomination for best film nomination in which rose not winning (as in the best director), thanks to the divine intervention in both categories of "The last emperor". |
2,741 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/172 | Jose Contreras | Misión imposible 3 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The luxuries are not explosions helicopters and skyscrapers. The script is another luxury. | One way of enriching the fiction is attention to detail. The horror genre accuses her as an excess when he falls into the offal, but action films win much when it goes into details. Mission impossible saga is very similar to James Bond, but her decisively in the details. Ethan Hunt much more entertains with their robberies, kidnappings, bailouts, breaks, and fights. He is not the pleasure of seeing him win, he is the pleasure of seeing you do.Each delivery of mission impossible limelight of the public worldwide. The creators know that they have to be at a high altitude to satisfy the expectations, but so far none have been overcome by Vertigo. NI de Palma, Woo nor now J.J. Abrahams, who some will know by the series "Alias". Each sequence of the film, each section is woven with the same amount of ideas than a full movie of another firm; and, possibly, with one bigger budget. A chapter of M: i:III is like a feast of action cinema. And it is shot with that wonderful feeling of adequacy. The beginning of the film tells how Ethan tries to rescue a spy of Berlin with an excess of media and adrenaline that in another film of the same genre would serve to give us an end of apotheosis. But little pleased with doses of action, the persecution of helicopters and the bombs, the writers tell us that the rescued spy can die by an implant in the brain. This type of stunts, of "harder still" accumulate throughout the film. It is as if the creators knew that the viewer has already seen all the possibilities of a countdown of a "cannot be saved from there" and to complicate it to tell us: "That's not all". Personally I'm afraid thinking that it will be the film when mission impossible III is more like an action movie.The luxuries are not explosions helicopters and skyscrapers. The script is another luxury. And you have one of these narrative tricks which I usually complain. But just one, does not support history in retoricas. And it is so timely. I'm going to take the liberty of tell: the story begins with a scene of the end; Ethan has to give the bad leg of rabbit, because if it is not given the bad you will kill the woman he loves; and it has ten seconds to decide what it does.Holliwoodiense film has evolved from the good guys who gave his life for the sake of society, of the 1940s (Cayo Largo) the bad guys today that make the same heroic but only to help the person who want to. Today no hero dares to say out loud that will play the type for a high cause; unless the hero interpret it Bruce Willis, of course. Ethan hunt should take so many as an example by the balance maintained between the two extremes. |
2,742 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3229 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Los Cronocrímenes | 3 | 5 | muchocine | My first feeling at the end of the movie was the of seeing something good but that certainly still could have been much better. | My first feeling at the end of the movie was the of seeing something good but that certainly still could have been much better. Let me explain: is that a little sweet and sour taste after seeing a kind of version somewhat troubled and contained too much of the actual capacity and imagery of the always playful and talented director of the shortfilms "7: 35 in the morning" and "Clash". The Cronocrimenes could have been even more subversive, more exciting, more spectacular, bloodiest, more Disney, more fun, more frightening, and which already offers, at the same time, actually is a real blow to the Bureau and a notice that there is true intentions to change the direction of the Spanish film, expand the current boundaries of genres, influences, themes and intentions and making a film more interesting, entertaining and attractive. Vigalondo tells rightly a history of travel in time with one made daring, original and intelligent and with a good script as best weapon. Bet bravely by a dose of science fiction away from conventions, risking the most with a minimalist staging and different and very authentic in its purposes. But it is also true that it overlooks some important aspects that had been able to significantly enrich the result. We have a picture right, but obsessively focused on realism, in the naturalness in a mise en scene perhaps too spectacular, and supported in a direction of art which seems to try to find a look that touches even the ugliness and chaotic. The address is not particularly striking and the camera is not at any time draw attention to so the visual language this subject rather to the service of the action. Not a plot is constructed with sufficient space for the attainment of some particularly noteworthy performances. Some insurance will discuss if it has been good or not the decision to grant is likewise one of the important roles of the film. My personal view is that the decision was good if the intention was to get work as a professional actor, but I also wonder if no could be found in Spain to some other actor even better and more experienced than himself for that role. Even with this, Vigalondo complies as an actor and his character, no doubt, manages to create empathy. The character of Barbara Goenaga, I would have liked to know something more to be able to accompany a little better in their adventure throughout history. About Karra Alejalde is now in tastes, because it is a very peculiar actor which leads to love and hate in equal parts. To me, particularly, I think is right for the role because it gives a turbid and unhealthy depth to the character and enough realism to their most extreme actions.The theme of conflict, development and emotional developments of the characters and motivations of these are usually somewhat schematic in the movie, when all this, however, is in my opinion always needed to help maintain regularly enough interest and sustain the pace, even despite being a genre film.The characters are also very few and the temporary puzzle proposed in the plot is therefore limited to the few pieces with which the author is obliged has play, and this results in the ability to surprise view diminished and many of the actions that occur, sometimes happen merely to comply with the turns and the temporary trouble, causing previously. This makes the argument it something predictable at times. However, Vigalondo manages to create an intelligent network temporary who shoots and nimbly accelerates the pulse and the dramatic tension, especially in the final part and get control at all times the twists and the plot pirouettes closing in addition everything with admirable ingenuity. In addition, add that enigmatic Eugenio Mira music accompanies and rightly extols the atmosphere of mystery and tension the film proposes.The debut of Nacho Vigalondo is one bet authenticates, surprising, anárquica and a both kamikaze seen preferences and the General tastes of the public and also seen the current scene of the fatherland national industry. It is certainly a very special and highly recommended movie and I encourage you all to you try to enjoy it in the film and if this is possible, I hope that very soon. A different a different author's proposal and this already it is of itself always a pleasant news. |
2,743 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3145 | Francisco Bellón | La Huella | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The footprint is a film clearly unnecessary, which seeks to update a masterpiece of Mankiewickz, but that gives us an extraordinary interpretation of Michael Caine. | After his presentation at the last Venice Festival, finally reaches the Spanish screens one of the most anticipated films of the year by fans of the film, the footprint. Strictly, one can speak of remake, that this new version as Joseph l. Mankiewicz (jewel film) adapted the play by Anthony Shaffer.Sin however, to speak of the modern version of the footprint without having in mind the formidable work of Mankiewicz is virtually impossible. Andrew Wyke (Michael Caine) is a successful novelist which invites you to spend a weekend in his mansion to Milo Tindle (Jude Law), an actor in unemployment that has escaped with his wife. Between the two develops a game twisted and dangerous consequences for the unsuccessful. Kenneth Branagh made a commendable effort to modernize the story, but sometimes gets the raya and crosses the threshold into the pretentiousness. In several key scenes of the first Act, the action is told of a hastily so that it does not give time to the Viewer to assimilate what you see. However, the worst mistake of the film is the screenplay by Harold Pinter. It is incredible that an author as Pinter is responsible for a text as the footprint. In its effort to endorse the work of Shaffer converts it in such a way that gives back to their own intentions and its meaning. The best of the film are no doubt Michael Caine and Jude Law, face in a magnificent although unequal interpretative duel. And it is that Michael Caine does a performance so memorable as of 1972.La mark is a film clearly unnecessary that seeks to update a masterpiece of Mankiewickz, but that gives us an extraordinary interpretation of Michael Caine. The rest, with the exception of Jude Law, raya in the most absolute mediocrity. |
2,744 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2506 | JLO | Al límite de la verdad | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Interesting, concise and daring development at times - as several attacks on their lives between actors - with a final - uf - with all possible concessions pro-mainstream that we did not expect to see even if it is for the one and only time. | A chance encounter as it can be a car accident serves as an excuse to portray the current madness of the inhabitants of New York and its known individualism, played in this time in lawyer Gavin Banek (Ben Affleck) and an insurance salesman named Doyle Gipson, played by Samuel Jackson always yields. The class struggle and the hysteria post 11-9 with their inevitable stereotypes, lawyer successful, corrupt, without nor moral ethic contrasted with an insurance salesman alcoholic with emotional and economic problems so as to not be able to solve his own family and inevitably black. By the clash Doyle lost valuable minutes and the trial for the possession of their children, while Gavin leaves forgotten a vital folder for their future at the hands of his recent enemy unleashing a fierce struggle to regain its recent past. We must stop in a valid although uneven acting counterpoint between a Samuel Jackson vigorous and real, in one of his best roles then of the well-remembered Jules from Pulp Fiction and a tasteless, although quite right Ben Affleck in a race in ascent, being them the best and salvageable from this film. Isn't that its director, the South African Roger Mitchell responsible for the failed and trumpeted A place called Notting Hill, comedy not demonstrates in his first foray into American cinema ideas and a firm for the drama, if not pace that his gaze is somewhat banal and superficial, depicting a society which he notices others, sucked by the machinery that everything devours it - see John WooJackie Chang and several more - accentuating is this with the faintness of the passage of minutes. This same the torna at times slow, mainly in the Office scenes a bit anodyne and with the plus of having aided by an excellent cast secondary, such as Sydney Pollack and William Hurt while emphasizing development interesting, concise and bold at times - as several attacks on their lives between the protagonists - a - uf - ending with all possible concessions pro-mainstream that we did not expect to see even by a single and only time. |
2,745 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/290 | Rafa Ferrer | Click | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Comedy, in short, leaving a very good taste in mouth | Nice comedy Adam Sandler reminds partly "Like God" and "Tale of Christmas of Charles Dickens" which is that the end of the film so reminds it, even "That beautiful is live" Capra, although it would be further too, and of course in the Adam Sandler movie is almost ask something impossible.Interpretive level, I'll take more than Sandler (that makes it always), with Kate Beckinsale, that leaves bellisima and Christopher Walken, which is eaten on screen all actors with only his presence, as well as Sean Astin nice its role (although for my always be "LOTR" Sam).If I would like a little loop the loop, draw the moralina that all moriríamos have a command of these característicias, in order to enjoy more time with the family, rest more normal hours because of work and advance those bad times that have to happen in life you want to or not, but thatAnother is sing, and we are not here to talk about it.Finally, a comedy that, in a nutshell, leaves a very good taste. |
2,746 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1190 | Rafa Ferrer | V de Vendetta | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Allegation to freedom, in a future that can remember both "Fahrenheit 451" and "1984" (not to be confused with the Michael Moore film), which also brought like-minded Kurt Wimmer for her not yet released in Spain "Equilibrium". | One of the films most win had to see in this year 2006 (and more) when its premiere was post-puesto from November 2005 to March 2006. Directed by James McTeigue responsible for second unit of the "Matrix" saga as well as "Star Wars", the tape, produced by Joel Silver and (in the form of script) was welcomed by the Wachosky brothers is a plea to the freedom, in the future we can remember both "1984" as to "Fahrenheit 451" (not to confused with the Michael Moore film)of which they also released similar Kurt Wimmer for her not yet released in "Equilibrium" Spain ideas.Well, I do not get lost in data, which but one does not know, and then go to the "heart" of the matter, the tape, as I have said is overflowing with freedom, and I will say more, had serious doubts about how Hugo Weaving (who never shows his face) was going to bring the drama crazy V need, as well, not only it provides [I had the luck of seeing the film in V.O.S] but that also you do not need to see his face, as with the tone of voice we clearly imagine what's behind the mask of the masked vigilante. Natalie Portman has always been my devotion Holy, so I cannot be objective in his interpretation (in a couple of scenes is I have jumped the tears), making of Evey vehemently absolute, quite unlike his character in the comic (I dare say that much more mature this "role"). John Hurt get what is intended and is that the public will take a tremendous hatred (as a Sutler, dictator), so if its role makes credible what more can ask you? |
2,747 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2827 | Antoni Messa | Locos por el surf | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A different film that stands out precisely why: for being different and daring, even, to replace the final moralina and bet instead on ridicule to a society that, like ours, is based on more aggressive competitiveness. | Compete in Billboard with another product of animation Ratatouille characteristics must be difficult. And more when the main protagonist is a surfer Penguin. Among the recent cinematic abuse of penguins (the Emperor's trip or Happy Feet, are clear examples of this) and how bad that generally work on surf in Spain films, is clear that mad about surfing has it tricky. If also add you that, despite being of a genre usually directed at children, this is a product treated in a way too adult that some of his jokes can be caught by children.Mad about surfing is a joke stark reality shows and docu, that satirizes ingeniously. The falsehood and the cynicism of the majority of this type of reports are fully reflected in the film. In it, a camera of a film crew, after which hides an anonymous reporter, will see Cody Maverick wherever it goes and, interested in his character, will also close the microphone to more friends. In this way, his mother, his brother, friends and work colleagues, verterán (or, rather, spit) all kinds of opinions and anecdotes about him. And it is that Cody is not more than a teenage Penguin whose highest aspiration in life is to become a famous surfer. Nobody understands the unhealthy obsession of the youngster palmiped to be at the top of the pedestal. and less when it comes to a ducks much care.The camera will follow our seabird along the route that separates his native land, Antarctica, of Pen Gu, a small tropical island in which will celebrate a championship of surfing at the global level, the Penguin World Surfing Championship. Once there, devoted most of his attention to analysing the born relationship between the rookie Cody and the once popular Big Z, an old and famous surfer who all were dead, and that the cazallosa voice of Jeff Bridges, in its original version, gives a very special character.Because it is an animated film, breaks moulds with respect to other similar and therefore starts by shying away from the appearance of those winks moviegoers so common (and sometimes unnecessary) in this type of film. And, even so, the treatment of student Cody with the elderly risen master, is almost impossible to stop thinking Karate Kid.Su humor is subtle, too complicated at times for the child audience, because even certain references to drug use (though somewhat covert) make an appearance during the footage. A chicken fond of surfing is placed thrusting the head just above one of the blowholes a whale, getting some hallucinogenic and anesthetic effect everytime the cetacean expels a strong stream of water; at the same time, the depressed and finish Big Z is a penguin, addicted to the oysters: without them there can be sguir forward. In order to carry out this proposal, the Sony contacted Ash Brannon and Chris Buck, two directors with extensive experience as animators in the service of the Disney and Pixar (before the Union of the two houses). Looking for new shades in the image processing succeeded, thus distancing itself visually the style from the most direct rival, the cited and wonderful Ratatouille and, unlike this one, at certain moments, showing dramatically real, as is the case with images that embody what surfers known as "the tube"; pass or just in the middle of the gap of water that forms a giant wave. A feeling so well described and filmed, although in the case of animation, transmitting to the viewer the same sentiments that surely run through the minds of those who practice this sport. A different film that stands out precisely why: for being different and daring, even, to replace the final moralina and bet instead on ridicule to a society that, like ours, is based on more aggressive competitiveness. He is not a round title to 100 percent, but your (laudable) efforts to distance itself from the avalanche of animatronics that is invading screens, (sympathetic) narrative as a mockumentary treatment and its tone (aplaudible) critical, make this a somewhat endearing work. And it is that good intentions always should take them into account. |
2,748 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3912 | Andrés Pons | La piel que brilla | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The awakening of the innocence of a fragile soul haunted by evil of the adults around him, with drops of horror film diverting to vampirism but without a drop of blood is a direct blow to the jaw of the Viewer to the accumulation of misfortunes that surround the child in a desperate world cannot be understood. | PHILIP RIDLEY is not a famous director, or moderately popular, has no awards, his filmography is very low because only has three films and some scripts.The last, the interesting "the passion of DARKLY NOON" where returned to tell the skin that shines with the great actor VIGGO MORTENSEN left a few years to achieve fame with the Rings trilogy.Let's talk about this masterpiece certainly turns out to be skin that shines one of the films most beautiful and sometimes cruel and seeing.Under the vision of a child tell cruel events in a village in the 1950s, a time portrayed to perfection. Abuse of minors, suicide, madness, animal abuse, murders. The awakening of the innocence of a fragile soul haunted by evil of the adults around him, with drops of horror film diverting to vampirism but without a drop of blood is a direct blow to the jaw of the Viewer to the accumulation of misfortunes that surround the child in a desperate world cannot be understood.At the end do not know if cry or shout, the hardness lets you senseless with that strange in its atmosphere beauty, picture master where can dream about playing fields that are flooding the screen. The music is shocking given that air of nightmare with a poetic scent in a most outstanding films of the 90s that incredibly not served to its author to achieve any kind of notoriety. |
2,749 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2698 | Bruji | Los Borgia | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Cesare Borgia unconvincing... an amalgam of episodes of television series, clumsily United by a deplorable montage. | Boasted as the great dream of all film lover lover of the historic gender: a passage from our story told by a filmmaker himself. Perfect atmosphere, excellent actors, technical deployment unprecedented and a prepared script. An attractive proposal, in which the only discordant note ventured at ceceante diction of peculiar Catherina Sforza. But, in the end, a dream... What could have been. It is possible that, on leaving the film, some film buffs remember that funny phrase with which American critics defined the work of the actor John Malkovich in the 1988 dangerous liaisons: "Sus andares, most characteristic of an inhabitant of Brooklyn to a French aristocrat of the 18th century". Bridging the gap? if you can - something similar could write, on this occasion, of one convincing short Cesare Borgia. A painful performance, which owes much of his little brilliance to the strange licenses linguistic, in many moments, allowing the script, and that are closer to the slang of the movida madrileña that language characteristic and own character in the 15th century.Still, isn't this a matter for RIP vestments? still-, if we take into account that this aspect? costume - what is deserving of a prominent mention. For something or for something we are talking about a blockbuster.Within a framework of incomparable beauty to have been filmed in real historical spaces? made cameras have failed to exploit or transmit to the spectator-the history shown remains faithful to the story of the novelist Mario Puzzo. A new vision of the family gandiense, aimed at dismantling the black legend, envisages in its time, the shoulders on it for centuries. Get good characterizations of the characters of Lucrecia and a Juan Borgia discreet, coming from one more than acceptable performance. Do the Lisp (and others), own from a quarry of actors that he has not worked in theatre ("the mother of the Lamb" of the Declamation), it is not obstacle for peace Vega, on this occasion, shine with their own light, as opposed to the new look be thundering about Alexander VI, in which accidents? that follows giving you the novel - is transformed into cartoon folly.In the historic area, the viewer must not fear. Responsible for the footage guarantee the various Italian States continue keeping their names (for example), and the history of its essence. With the "perspective that gives the distance" have been numerous cases in which American filmmakers created Kings and countries non-existent. Remember, El Cid in 1961, in which the advice of D. Ramón Menéndez Pidal could not prevent that Heston Díaz de Vivar take the square of Valencia "on behalf of the King of Spain", in full period of the reconquest. In this sense, Los Borgia that arises as a masterful and typical kind of history. We understand by "typical" that first hour on Monday, in which the tone of voice of the Professor, monotonous and linear, did the imagination, not to the 15th century and Yes to a much more recent past: the last weekend. A mental journey that used to be abruptly interrupted when the tedious and tired voice raised the volume. In the film, the giro that does leave the torpor comes from "informalization", breakdown of the script.There is no doubt that it is unwise to begin to tell a story by almost the end of it, back "twelve years earlier", advance "three years later", return to the starting point and end. An invention that worked you at one of the big one of ours, Don Martin Scorsese, and usually get the attention of the Viewer. Now well, for many blockbuster than and much decomposition to propose, entire film has to have a beginning, a development with its "heat of the moment" corresponding and an outcome. Try to have too many starters with their subsequent analysis, merely give the impression to be attending the screening of an amalgam of episodes of television series, clumsily United by a deplorable montage.In the section of the surprises, what Yes striking thing is knowing that there is not a single epic battle in the film. Various contests insinuate the viewer with the presence of corpses on the battlefield, with Cesare Borgia playing with his sword, or by resorting to the old trick on the map, in which a red line marks the unifying advance. Something similar was suggested in his day to Stanley Kubrick to tell Spartacus. An idea that the director made, because go to this narrative process would never convey the historical significance of an army of slaves who put in check the greatest political power known in the ancient world, of Rome. And that is precisely what is happening in this work, which fails to understand the fame of wise strategists, best warriors, and arrogant insolentes that encourage hatred and envy of those who agreed in their walk, that is not known to where is the greatness of the Borgia.Aunque, perhaps most striking of all the tape halle in the unfortunate scene in which Lucretia shows a letter from his brother Caesar to the Duke of It ferrara, at the top of a tower. A sequence unworthy of a filmmaker who is a little gem in the city without limits and this is the story of Los Borgia, a product intentionally designed to be rentabilizado to unexplored limits still by Spanish films. To the "How was shot", has followed the film, and it will do the television series, with its annual revivals during the next century. The Alcantara family has rival. |
2,750 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3413 | Ramón Besonias | Fresas Salvajes | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Bergman: the image that speaks to us. | Bergman is among our most recent Classics (already in posthumously), but he himself baby with avidity of those other not so recent classics, from the Greek Theatre and to weave the vital volume of a plot, they invoked rather than the power of the physis (the pure image) stripped of logos - theatrical resource preteatral and Dionysian roots - but this internal dialogue that every human being kept with you until death shut you your mouth.Bergman that same death silent us and in turn makes us speak (by way of indignant lament), as Miguel de Unamuno would say that another tragic called. Greek tragedy invented the inner voice, the conscience, the flow of our live through the mediation of the language. And this metaphysical attempt is itself an unsuccessful attempt to revive us without the pain that we feel to be fatal and drowned anger who knows that death always wins (and not only to chess, all the games), despite the eternal attempt of the hero - Greek or modern - for cheating through the language, through in the end of art, of beauty.Art, more specifically his seventh son (film), has sought anesthetized with beauty this human determination, thereby invoking a contingent disguised as eternity. Blockbusters naively ironically with the possibility of serving childish drug the viewer adormilado by the modern dream of Peter Pan. With the film never we will die, at least during the footage of the film. Movie, popcorn and Coca-Cola will serve as a factory of ephemeral illusions that entronizan the pure image as opiate the masses satisfied Western Idol. Bergman lived in the Antipodes of the post-modern cult of the film image. For him it was almost an ethical demand desmitologizar the human being facing him dry with its determinations. "Know yourself", reads the Oracle. This invokes, as did the Greek dramatists, the logos, the honest word that comes from us not to communicate with each other, but to be saved by them. In the film these others are evoked through immemorial ghosts or limit situations that arouse images blurred, forgotten to delude ourselves or does not suffer.Read Sartre that the human being is an illusion impossible, and can do anything by ceasing to be so. Without this attribute essential and existential art, and with him the film would not be possible. All art - of Bergman's almost pornographic, explicit way - is metaphysics, rebellion against the contingency of bodies, who know that even living, each breath they know that they are already dead. According to Bergman film is a tragic fight against ourselves (lost), an expression of discomfort that sits in our minds since we are born.Woody Allen would sign this thesis, although with a more hilarious and hedonistic metaphor. Why cinema should uncomfortable reality, resist it, and only to support it as a substrate of memory, that memory personal, biographical, which keeps us alive, with a mission. The past, not as footprint of what is no longer but was, but as ruin our imagination reconstructs as you can, is the material which uses Bergman to cheat death, or deceive himself (to be fair). Without this aesthetic (and ethics, but without morals or cassocks) mission to deconstruct our last, life would be bleak, a valley of tears.Here's a scene that has no waste. Woody Allen has signed similar scenes career, but never with the torn tone of his master. In the hands of Allen narration would have diluted under a tone of humor somewhat comforting. Postmodern redemptions do not fit under the gaze of Bergman. We are forced to watch us face to face. That is why perhaps the work more bergmaniana Allen if anything is another woman. |
2,751 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4236 | Sandra Ríos | Michael Clayton | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A simple film that uses distractive elements to tangle her, making it more complex and sobrevalorarla more than it really should be. | I have argued many times that I am going to see a film with the minimum information, with strictly necessary because believe to listen or read previous comments ago permeate your own discretion. However, only the fact of knowing the vast amount of accomplished nominations generated high expectations. But I also recognize that things like being the directorial debut of Tom Gilroy recognized Hollywood screenwriter with significant works such as the myth of Bourne of 2004 and the Bourne Ultimatum of last year and the participation of excellent actors led by Tom Wilkinson, and Tilda Swinton they helped him further. Annoying most of Michael Clayton is the immense ability to tangle the plot through a high level language, with a libretto that becomes heavy and at certain points tiring, in what we can call a film whose plot is nothing innovative and whose plot can crumble easily. The strategy used was trying to create of already created, a "smart" script by a subject specialist for trying to reach some spectators with a more refined and exquisite taste. However in their background there such and the plot is simple and so easy presumably, that from the beginning part us the importance that would have the role of Karen Crowder played by Tilda Swinton.Michael Clayton uses part of the complex and heavy, dialogues time as tool to increase a simple intringülis that begins in the deselance of the sameIt lies in a flashback larghissimo back to its point home to trigger what from the beginning with those first images of a big Tilda Swinton, was assumed. Swinton throughout footage gives us a large sample of interpretation that make for my best of the tape and which make worthy just the nomination as best actress of Reparto.El beginning of the film is really good, as also the picture thanks to the excellent selection of scenery natural beginning with New York and Royal offices of the most important law firms in this city. But in flashback stories and moments distractive are used to lengthen his end. Halfway this becomes evident with a number of details that are no more than trivial and end up tiring to the Viewer. This is certainly a weapon of double edge because it suggests that the end will bring an explosion of vibrant and definitive moments, but the truth is that none of this happens and more than "elegance" as many have called the end of Michael Clayton, for I do not is more than a simple finish that stands out again repeat, the performance by Tilda Swinton. Not taking game by one side or the other with a calculating end, is the least that can be expected of a film over his footage stands out for this typical feature of thrillers that are wrapped in the world of law, its laws and the ambitions of those who handle them. I can hardly recognize brilliant in this aspect that some critics have pointed out.Although all of the above, the film no longer interesting thanks to lucid moments that save it notoriously. It is initially quite promising of this writer that ironically failed in his script precisely, but forgive by being his directorial debut. In addition it became clear the desire and ambition for showing us a risky and modern film that although he failed it is totally and absolutely valid. |
2,752 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2559 | Caty | Timeline | 1 | 5 | muchocine | By removing the first ten minutes and a couple of somewhat decent dialogues?Timeline? It is a film to see and forget. | While the idea of a trip in the time always is attractive, cinematically speaking (although it has been very exploited, even has that appeal that, well made, can lead us to spend two hours quite entertaining), on this occasion we have a movie that begins in a very promising way, but that measure which is making progress in its developmentit becomes a tedious show.The director, Richard Donner, responsible for such films as "The Goonies", "Lethal weapon", "The prophecy" or "Superman" (films that once enjoyed a warm welcome among the public), offers us a tape without more significance that a well-known adaptation novel of Michael Crichton.Lo which could be a good approach (life in the 14th century, paradoxes space storms that can be created by altering some event in the past) becomes a surface productionmade for the public not stop eating popcorn and think not for two hours.We can observe as the characters and the plot itself, are diluted until you reach the limit of bland, of foreseeable (from the moment in which they appear in the 14th century, any moderately intelligent person can guess the 80 percent of the film without disheveled), with almost no interpretive depth by actors, resulting fully comedian that a group of young people without any preparation journey to the past and faced and defeated to burly officers of the English army with swords of 5 kilos, bows and other military paraphernalia. Even the siege of the Castle offers moments of action and spectacular nature, resembling props soldiers who act as if we were watching the worst episode of any B.Quitando the first ten minutes and a couple of somewhat decent dialogues, "Timeline" is a film to see and forget. |
2,753 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1498 | Iñigo | Pulse | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Computer viruses that extend, ghostly appearances, a future in danger: a pulse to the patience of the Viewer. | Yet another tape of terror influenced by Asian elements that comes to the Billboard of our country, and once again makes it from the place where born stars with dreams and move in starry dreams."While they continue to generate benefits, as they currently do, they will continue giving sense the phrase labeled on the front of the rabbit of Duracell.""Pulse" is another clear example that terror is doomed to become extinct in its truest sense. Demeaning you within this genus because it is not known in what place it exactly. Perhaps suspense, full of tension macedonia perhaps. But anything horror, none of embarrassment.Already leave no space nor to startle, simuladamente warned in advance and with intention of annoying recidivism.It will not be a server which contradicts the film before us comes to distract an empty evening, but as obvious suspicion, the spectator in search of film (not mere pastime) immense, or being more lenient, cinema as artistic medium, will not find any Philo here.Is more. If us invades an evening with accumulated tasks, with some prior irritation or we are obliged to pay your entrance fee, surely will launch all kinds of insults (and not without reason) against the mother that shone Jim Sonzero.Dice the adage that patience is the mother of all sciences, and we are not going to be in all the human and spiritual peace that fills us with, which rectify your message. Breathing deeply all acquires best dyes.Because we are all perfectly warned that "Pulse" is not just another movie to fill the pockets of some while (without shame, of course) are deshabitando others. Come on, the Act of life itself.This remake in the form of by-product (no one has said that the original nor is, despite the fact that the intentions of the two are very different) baby everything a bit, and at the end, obviously grab a staggering cogorza. A SIP of "Resident Evil", one of "28 days after", another "Silent Hill" and, not to be left with so little, several long drinks of all Eastern tapes occurring to us: "The Ring", "Missed call", etc. And that many of those listed, in turn, were clones of other already lit.Perhaps with "The curse" the thing had its spark, but at this point, no longer surprise ghostly appearances, girls whose mothers are unaware of the concept of cleaning to do their filthy nightshirts (okay, here what we see are fuzzy and blinking spectra, I recognise his great step towards the singular), the trickle of faucets, lonely bathrooms, preceded increases in volume coups, ghostly cameras, mobile phones that leave no sound: very easy, all topics accumulated over the last decade in this kind of movies. Pretend to be surprised so non-obviousness more than a clumsy and ridiculous presuntuosidad.We could, without major setbacks, work as editors in his team, we know better than the director himself when he brincará a cat, will leave a shadow or a cry will hit the neighbor.And for more inri, looms true message moralistic/critic towards a society in which computers, piracy and technology advancing at a terrifying rate, and can generate insurmountable conflicts. Who the hell is the writer? Indeed: the ineffable Wes Craven appears in the path of the credits.Clear that Yes. Nor need the fatalistic, desert, chaotic end that characterizes films such as some of those listed at the beginning of the text.But there are days in which one rises benevolent, and rather than generate a simple and direct explanation that defined the film as a monumental trash (fruit of the suffered loss of time), is dedicated to search its favourable points. Probably in "Pulse" there will be None if you look at film, but without meditate more, I apuntaros two: its clear character of hollow entertainment and dark, perhaps apocalyptic atmosphere but always achieved and consistent with the intention of the film.Nothing to mention. No one is lost nothing, so let's stop give rise to platitudes. For that is "Pulse".The rest, each Viewer is perfectly aware of what you're buying and what you sell. Everything leads us to film today's trade: some work, others rush to the pragmatic. Some win, others lose. But, who has said that this is the game that all play? |
2,754 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/279 | Rafa Ferrer | Superman returns | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Disappointment. The tape falls sharply, they put aside the heroic Superman theme and takes the part of love story | All ballots had to be one of the "taquillazos" of the year 2006, all options to make a film that will love me, to make me dream, who would be willing to revisit over and over again, but. After the joy that had been in the room (it was even applauding the mythical John Williams Superman theme), the tape falls sharply, they put aside the heroic Superman theme and takes the part of "love story" (boy returns to see girl, who is with another.).And nothing, unfortunately is what it seems, the film tilda boring, slow (too much), and very simplistic, one expects a final auction that never arrives and the sour taste will gradually desvaratando in the personality of the Viewer.Note positive interpretation of Brandon Routh, who sometimes comes to "imitate" Christopher Reeve, and the always great Kevin Spacey, mixing the best Lex Luthor with small "lashes" of Joker "Batman", ah! The Score of John Ottman also sensational, mixed in some moments with the theme of John Williams. Finally, you had to listen to the air of disappointment floating in the room at the end of the projection. |
2,755 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3477 | Francisco Bellón | Encantada: La Historia de Giselle | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Enchanted: The history of Giselle is a film that will delight the little ones, and shows for adults, that timely sometime laugh with his particular sense of humor, or the spark and natural grace of Amy Adams. | It is incredible how the majority of children's films made the serious mistake of not valuing the intelligence of children, believing that they can accept anything without protest. The big studios have been the ears to the Wolf and many have put hands to work, producing some films that don't take stupid children, to the great delight of his parents.Enchanted: The history of Giselle aims to be a new step in the Disney factory in this regard, that at first glance it seems a parody of the typical fairy tale. The first minutes of animation do presage, and prospects seem to consolidate to go to real action. However, little by little, that intention auto - parodic is declining to go into a romantic comedy to the use. Musical numbers contribute significantly to this evolution, and it seems nobody has thought at Disney that include songs in a child film is from another era. The end result is precisely what was intended to avoid the film, being a product ñoño and overly sweetened. If the Ribbon is more than bearable for adult audiences is through the interpretation of Amy Adams, although occasionally his exageradísima voice of pito can cause a slight attack of nerves. James Marsden and Patrick Dempsey are on the contrary too soft.Enchanted: The history of Giselle is a film that will delight the little ones, and shows for adults, that timely sometime laugh with his particular sense of humor, or the spark and natural grace of Amy Adams. |
2,756 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/646 | Rafa Ferrer | Scoop | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Sincere, enjoyable and very well shot to remember their first film forays Allen. | Woody Allen back roaring with a comedy where both Scarlett (his new Muse), as director himself give luster to a sincere, enjoyable and very well shot film that reminds the Allen of his first and most heartfelt film forays, perhaps, discordant note is that of Hugh Jackman, little credible in its action and is the shadow of Wolverine and the X-Men"is a slab that not even Wolverinewith its incredible metal blades you can pass through.Music again, comes to be a great companion of trip of the footage that Allen composed on the screen, and, it's a choice very well done that one accompanies, almost baton mode the image with the tune.The argument, although improbable, is fun, and you have parties where it has no very clear that you will find at the following time (Nothing predictable script of the genius of NY). Anyway, was waiting as water may and the truth is that, in my wise opinion, the opinion may not be more favourable. |
2,757 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/275 | Jeremy Fox | Superman returns | 4 | 5 | muchocine | They will enjoy as children with this new Superman seemed hexed for movies and that Singer and screenwriters Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris have given life again. | I was fortunate to be able to attend the press pass for one of the films most awaited by all lovers of cinema that we still maintain an adventurous spirit: "Superman Returns" by Bryan Singer.En she tell us how, after a mysterious absence of several years, the man of steel (Brandon Routh) returns to a planet Earth who has used to survive without him. Upon arrival discovers that the woman he loves, Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth), is living with another (James Marsden) and had a son (Tristan Lake Leabu). To make matters worse misfortune Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey), his great enemy, has come out of jail and has a plan.The nostalgia factor plays an important role, and I am not ashamed to say that a smuggler of moonfleet as hard as I was about to drop a lagrimita, during the initial credit titles, to listen to the mythical theme composed by John Williams. Theme, by the way, brilliantly honored and used with restraint and intelligence by a John Ottman which is to rise to the occasion.Bryan Singer had a really difficult challenge before it and showing that it is a courageous director took several risky decisions. The first one is to continue more or less history where he was after "Superman II", thus maintaining a certain narrative and style with the previous films continuity. In fact this return saved much of the spirit of the "Superman" by Richard Donner, to the point that could even be considered a disguised remake. Point that may make happy to those we saw in theaters for 28 years but could remain indifferent to the younger and more distant from the original public.Another risky decision of Singer is to print the film a leisurely pace. The film focuses more on the problems of Superman to find again its place in the world, in the pure and simple action. Action which, putting us demanding and despite being brilliantly filmed, we must recognize that it lacks that pure emotion that did "Batman Begins". Here the emotion not the find both in action, that something also in the intimate moments. I cannot deny that see Superman fly again in arms carried Lois Lane came to the heart.To loop the loop of the risk, Singer decided to dispense with the final climax that is assumed to a tape of these features. This decision, together with the above-mentioned leisurely pace, can upset much of the public potential, possibly eager to see Fireworks at any price, but is entirely consistent with what you want to count. We are not to a character with the innocence of the 1970s. The Singer Superman is a mature character, who suffers, who is overwhelmed by a world that would require too many like him to succeed. Perhaps this Superman pretends to be younger (even though Brandon Routh is one year older than Reeve when he played it for the first time) but life has become very expensive bills and that enriches the character.Much of the eyes of critics and fans will be directed to the actors. Are Routh and Bosworth and Spacey at the height of Reeve, Kidder and Hackman? In general, I think Yes. Especially striking found it me the actor protagonist because if it is totally credible as Kent (his performance is really cloned the Reeve), since then convinces altogether as the Acero.Evidentemente man could one complain that the plan of Luthor is a little weird and little concrete (even a smart way to connect even more this film with the above)that has very few and clumsy helpers or that it is impossible that so savvy journalists are not able to see that Clark Kent and Superman are the same person. But accept all these premises is necessary condition to enter to see the movie. If one does not accept that it is better to stay out of the film.But all those willing to accept the rules of the game, will enjoy as children with this new Superman seemed hexed for movies and that Singer and screenwriters Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris have given life again, adapting it to 21st century. Superman Returns to stay and that is certainly a good news. |
2,758 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4110 | Luna | Es un mundo libre | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A round film in sum, with the quality in terms of accomplishment to which we are accustomed Loach. If you want spend a time of good cinema, with history and social background, do not let escaapar this film. | Ken Loach has always been characterized by telling stories with a marked social trend and in this his last film will not disappoint his staunchest followers. In this case it tells us the story of a woman dedicated to hire immigrants as temporary workers in England and its history serves as a pretext to narrate and deepen in another topic more important, more real and in which many people have submerged today: immigration, illegal immigration and all the issues surrounding this sad social reality. Numerous small dramas are those who tells Paul Laverty, which has become one of the writers Ken Loach collaborating lately (hers was the script of the previous films of Loach as "The wind that shakes the barley", "Happy dieciseís" or "bread and roses").The gaze of Loach not only focuses on the characters, who follows and described the diseccionadora precision of a surgeon, but that also covers the city of London which runs the story and which becomes another character, silent witness of what happened. Loach focuses in this case in London that tourists don't see, from the dirty alleys of the parking of caravans as home and the factories dirty work dangerous that nobody wants to do and that only the unhappy poor who come seeking to improve their situation dare to carry out. And is that you as the protagonist says "is a free world.". A free world in which each receive benefits to hands full with the sweat of others while most malvive working too many hours a day in ethically questionable jobs.Ken Loach addresses the issue with sincerity, and the viewer understands but the reality shows the director is lasting and complicated, the real world is sensed even more thorny and contentious. In this case, as in other films by the same director, the plot of the story is important, but the role of the characters is also relevant, and we can see how they evolve. In other films, Loach works with actors looking for naturalness and realism to compose a few truthful and real characters. In this case most of the acting weight rests with Kierston Wareing, a little-known British actress who before this film had worked in some video and in a supporting role in small television clamoring. The actress who was thinking of retiring from the world of interpretation when, as they say, Ken Loach called on your door with this role and upset their plans and their world so bad saw the panorama. Despite being his first role protagonist Wareing well supports the pressure and every time appears in full screen it with truth and the roundness of her character. They have been slow to discover it but sure that it won't be the only role as protagonist to interpret (and won't have to leave the world of interpretation) in fact shortly we can see it in "Rise of the foot soldier" of Julian Gilbey.El rest of the cast also has been chosen with great success and achieve a very credible composition of his characters which, in many cases, you forget that you are watching a movie and it seems that you immersed in a documentary hayes, or in life itself.The fact that most of the film is narrated camera in hand, with a hard and realistic picture of Nigel Willoughby who does not lose in embellishing the image also contributes to this. This is to be welcomed because it is not a pretty story. It's scream from the rooftops what is telling is real and is happening. And the Précieuses here does not take place.A round film in sum, with the quality in terms of accomplishment to which we are accustomed Loach, and perfectly wrapped by the soundtrack to George Fenton, one of the last regular contributors of Ken Loach (theirs are the soundtracks of recent films of Loach, "The wind that shakes the barley" or "Happy sixteen"). If you want spend a time of good cinema, with history and social background, do not fail to escape this film. |
2,759 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2555 | Rafa Ferrer | La Joven Jane Austen | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It will please fans of the British writer and those who enjoy dramas with impossible love, the rest will seem a careful tape, explendidamente done, but simple and fairly mundane, so we are going to cheat. | Yesterday, at the very first thing in the morning and thanks to muchocine.net I planted in the heart of Madrid to attend the press pass of this tape, curious, on the other hand, although it premiered in October, is now in July when have decided to give it a little "vidilla", which, although she is made with taste and care details, doubt have sufficient interest to drag the masses to the cinema.And is that this kind of cinema, of time you have to like in advance, and is that Anne Hathaway, James McAvoy, Julie Walters, Maggie Smith and James Cromwell are not actors with sufficient weight or potential so we decide between this or another tape, and much that my I like Hathaway or I toss much of the footage thinking where had seen before James McAvoy (in the Chronicles of Narnia)the tape is irregularly good and is that although the tape convinces few and strangers, it gets in some moments to yawn, with its strange changes of pace, especially in the 2nd half of the Ribbon, where one wants anything else, very different from what displays on the screen.I imagine that among feminists, and fans of Austen, the film like, as I noticed both by one of the girls that went right by my side in the press, as to my friend Isa pass, big fans of the English author, if he has been faithful shaping the life of this, besides that Anne is important as Austen, but these impossible love and that drama, tires to the more shadowy spectators.In short; It will please fans of the British writer and those who enjoy dramas with impossible love, the rest will seem a careful tape, deflightfully done, but simple and fairly mundane, so we are going to cheat. |
2,760 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1298 | Caruco | Más extraño que la ficción | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Do do envisions us aquelllo that we can save the life, in the form of? nuances, anomalies and suggestions? a film like this or to discover. | A tragedy always gives packing and depth to a work. And if not that should ask Shakespeare, the Greek classics or Harold Crick, this third an individual for anything well-known or popular, more a solo and bland finance inspector, a bureaucrat delivered to thousands of daily rituals that constantly recur in their grey existence.And in fact, never know you if they do not see "Stranger than fiction". But what is important here is to emphasize that Harold Crick (a tight Will Ferrell) also subscribe this opinion to feet letter, although this will suposiera put an end to his own life.The second point is that screenwriter Charlie Kaufman and his philosophical, amateur to the metalanguage, original and reflective comedies of the type "Forget about me", "Adaptation (the Orchid thief)" or "as being John Malkovich," has left an imitator, Zach Helm, who by the way does not anything wrong with "Stranger than fiction".Its crazy argument, properly seasoned with a notable amount of romanticism, begins by raising the maximum power the idea of the writer or artist, as creator or demiurge. A sort of God that can play, happily or not, with the fate of his creatures.As a life-saving.In this case a depressive writer, Karen Eiffel (Emma Thompson), with crisis of inspiration and a muse, Penny Escher (Queen Latifah), imposed by Decree of his publishing house. And Karen, either by chance or by inexplicable divina-creadora intervention, will give a turnaround to its existence, along with his less fictional character than I would like. Tested the inexorable certainty of death, you will see that life can also have another bright side.Perhaps this is not the pleasure of another illustrious colleague, Professor, writer and psychiatrist Jules Hilbert (Dustin Hoffman), but at least the passionate and rebellious owner of a humble restaurant, Ana Pascal (Maggie Gyllenhaal), insurance that would appreciate that not all masterpiece is fatally marked by the funeral.Anyway, do not even need to worry about trying to decipher this criticism, but if you want to see a film original and different, as well as notable as the best film of Marc Forster ("Monster's ball", "Finding Neverland" or "Transit"), her would not escape.Speaks of works and characters of reality and destiny, the sublime and the mundane, even watches, wristwatches and electric guitars, and as much as the black shadow of death plan on their frames, also envisions us aquelllo that can save us life, is in the form "shades, anomalies and suggestions" or a film like this to discover. |
2,761 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/580 | Enrique Colmena | Los Borgia | 4 | 5 | muchocine | After a somewhat dubious beginning seemed skidding for the elemental in the central characters, it soon lifts flight, adensando is, constructing an almost Entomological portrait. | It seems that the film of time (medieval or del Siglo de Oro) again to fashion in Spain; a few months ago premiered "Strained the white" (by the way, with a costalazo at the box office of very careful), later "Alatriste", which has functioned well commercially (though a far cry from the astronomical figure of its budget), and now "Los Borgia", another megaproducción that has been implicated to Antena 3, co-producer of the film fund. It must be said, input, that perhaps the effort was too large to do in cinema: the life of the Borgia Pope, Alexander VI, and their children, over the eleven years that lasted his papacy, is filled with events of all kinds, to the point that have been necessary two and a half hours of footage to tell the vital life of this peculiar family group. So, better would have been to shoot a television miniseries, as it will probably end up being shown on television (do in Antena 3, clear?). However, the challenge, with the inevitable faults of rhythm in which footage so prolonged ago incur, has paid off with a positive outcome. Because "Los Borgia", after a somewhat dubious beginning seemed skidding for the elemental in the central characters, soon raises the flight, adensando is, constructing an almost Entomological portrait, in which not take party in favour or against, a Valencian family arrival to absolute power in the Vatican, at the turn of the 15th to 16th centurya powerful historical moment (just discover America, Spain is already a unitary State and is poised to be an empire, ends the dark middle ages for entering the bright Renaissance). This family Borja or Borgia, to speak with the Italian spelling that happened to posterity, made their own interest the end by which the Vatican would be governed and, thanks to its spiritual, but also temporary power (at that time, Stalin could not say that wicked irony of "how many divisions had the Pope"? because them had), the rest of the known world. Ambitious film, that properly combines complex conspiracies trumped by the paterfamilias of the Borgia Pope Alexander VI as well as the sorrows of his sons (the blood, effervescent Caesar tarambana Juan deferential Jofré; the recklessness and finally so scalded Lucrecia, here very far the portrait of matahombres that informal history awarded), nursery scenes of action and a broad deployment of resources, is no stranger, yet beautiful film details: the crying of the Pope before the death of his son, splendidly given by a Lluis Homar transmitting as only they know make good theatre actors; the overhead map of the death of the Pontiff; the final scene, with the suicidal charge of Caesar and that zoom until the lens disc which confirms the secret love he felt for her sister? details of exquisite and creative filmmaker who is Hernandez, who leads with solvency are a great film device like this, a mammoth enterprise that has reaped a brilliant result. Another thing is that it works well at the box office: the absence of flashy actors can do run aground a colorful commitment and a huge effort that deserves another treatment. Special mention to that volcano still pending to erupt which responds to the name of Sergio Peris-Mencheta, reminiscent of the first Javier Bardem, and not only physically: has the power of the protagonist of "Mar adentro", although perhaps not their ductility? Hopefully I'm wrong. |
2,762 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/525 | Matías Cobo | Corrupción en Miami | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A movie best wrapper that content. Even so, compared to others of a similar genre, the Michael Mann film exceeds the average thanks to his very personal and recognizable style. | I don't know where I heard or read that the way in which Michael Mann wheel its action scenes is more plausible. And the truth is that, if we take a look to Heat or Collateral, their two most comparable tapes with Miami Vice in this regard, we agree that their bullets and gunfire do seem sound, and develop, as the truth. In them there is no trace of that exaggeration so characteristic of the film by which you can shoot a shotgun barrel cut to a hand without its bearer the pulse, or that other that the bullets of the wicked only refresh them the neck shaking you some reckless opponents in their actions. In addition, his scripts for this type of work nor tend to ascribe to own the tape action of conventions. Heat could be almost considered an urban western raised as a pulse between two colossi as De Niro and Pacino. And the argument of Collateral is more atypical even: Tom Cruise, a Hitman, and Jamie Foxx, a taxi driver, the vehicle agree on a great job rush for the first night. However, the scripts of both outweigh the flat and unoriginal story of this Miami Vice, based on characters from the series of 80 which the own Mann was executive producer. That itself, apart from having used the names of the agents?Sonny? Crockett and Ricardo Tubbs and the title of the series, this film little or nothing has to do with television production created by Anthony Yerkovich.Y already not only because the aesthetics of Mann diffused any possible parallel with the series, which only shares the luxury of Miami environments, but because he sees little of Miami andeven less, of the portrayed in a series that perhaps seen now, could already seem a tad casposa, despite the acclaimed which resulted in those years. Therefore, this free adaptation made by Mann stands his peculiar nocturnal photography, with a marked grain on screen we already enjoyed in Collateral, tape that Mann began experimenting with the use of digital technologies, and the additional possibilities provided by them for the filming of night scenes. As well, some Miami panoramas shot in closed night offer a sparkling beauty. Little action of the tape, concentrated at the end of his extensive footage (almost two and a half hours), yes carried this particular rubric of Mann of which spoke the principle is also remarkable. But that fails in it, in my opinion, is what happens in his knot. Its history wants to focus on how develops the infiltration of two policemen in an embedded criminal network equipped with powerful tools of Counterespionage. In addition to detailing the intricacies of a mission of this caliber, Mann delves into how the second identity of the agent can sometimes pollute to the true. But the development of all this plot, the truth, it is slow and, at times, poorly explained. In fact, the tape begins with the death of two officers infiltrated a police force other than Sonny and Tubbs due to a tip-off from one of the security agencies involved. As well, in the outcome, once two Miami policemen to resume the work of his fallen teammates, is not resolved the worrying issue of the tip-off.Acting work, Colin Farrell convinces as the charismatic Sonny, Foxx is effective as the brain?Do rich?, surprised in her few appearances Luis Tosar as bad content, as it highlights the sensual presence of the beautiful Gong Li. And the music choice is right to accompany the night sequences by Miami or the locations of Haiti and final Cuba.En, a film best wrapper that content. Even so, compared to others of a similar genre, the Michael Mann film exceeds the average thanks to his very personal and recognizable style. But its history already have told other many times and, even better than here. To cite some examples, infinitely better are the police tapes based on James Ellroy scripts. |
2,763 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1132 | Plissken | Mujeres en el parque | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Women in the Park I thought it was boring, neglected and, what is worse, seems to be made only for its director and his screenwriter. | Show me. How to write this without that one of the creators of the film take it badly. Bah, I can not. 'Women in the Park' I thought it was boring, neglected and, what is worse, seems to be made only for its director and his screenwriter.Official Synopsis: "Daniel, music teacher and pianist and Ana, gallerist, in crisis of couple after more than twenty years of life in common." Daniel has gone to live alone and wants to divorce. Anne refuses to accept the reality.Distress affects his daughter Monica, which, after finishing the career of journalism, is particularly sensitive to not find work, task which is dedicated along with her boyfriend, David.La music seems to be the only activity that focuses and sosiega Daniel, a man uncomfortable I get same and others, and a relationship that is far from perfect with Clara", a married woman that arouses the curiosity of Monica. A night, Monica lives an incomprehensible and embarrassing episode in which becomes involved along with Daniel and Ana Clara."My Synopsis: "Daniel and Ana are in the process of separation, and do not communicate too well." Monica, her daughter, cannot find work, and also communicates well. When you try to rebuild his relationship with his father, he meets Clara, her lover to not communicate well neither she, nor her father. The one that seems not experience communication problems is David, Monica's boyfriend. A pity that is surrounded by so much incommunicado. They all walk through Retiro "Felipe Vega, director, and Manuel Hidalgo, screenwriter, they claim to have focused on the characters when creating 'Women in the Park', and ensure that themselves characters are that, with total freedom, shape history." The first thing I think so, because it is true that the main characters are absolutely consistent with its nature, from beginning to end: come on, progression, the minimum. Daniel (Adolfo Fernández), Anne (Blanca Apilánez) and Clara (Emma Vilarasau) make up a triangle monochord, inexplicably lacking in tension. Monica (Barbara Lennie) should be the reagent to finally jump Sparks, but stays too long in the position of simple observer. David (Alberto Ferreiro) is a mere accessory to reveal Monica copy the conduct of his father. The other side, better not speak, because they are simple Springs script so that the characters can tell you about themselves. In summary: Vega and Hidalgo don't tell a story, they show the miseries of characters close to them, perhaps, but vastly alien to me, for example.At the technical level is also reflected the priority of director and screenwriter: most of the film's sequences are static dialogues between two characters, most of them seated and determined to master/level/contraplano. The other half of sequences are walking in the Park of the Retiro and surroundings, illustrating, I suppose, the closure of these characters. Man, not say I that make travelling circulars, but if the narrative of alone it was already non-existent rhythm deteriorates to the fainting. Or the cabezada.Not everything is negative. The interpretations are adjusted, but the characters are so content that the actors sometimes rub the hieratismo. They are generally correct, highlighting Bárbara Lennie in the positive part and a kid very hostiable making student of the Professor of music at the negative side.But worst of all is not statism and sobriety (poverty) or visual, or the feeling of me are counting something that me doesn't interest me. The worst thing is that the last twenty minutes are dedicated to trying to give an explanation to the dysfunctional of all these relationships, with a twist worthy of a soap opera and totally out of place. Go fabric, so sobriety and then come me with them.In short, I bored me and much, and still not know who expect those responsible for the film than his public. 4, For the performances. |
2,764 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1426 | Jose Contreras | Diamante de sangre | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The hollow voice that loose sentences of catechism was, the UNFPA, the star. There was a girl to make work a romance. It is actually not, to hold the banner that whites can fix Africa with a couple of laws. That maja, she. | "Blood diamond" has the appeal of having chosen a framework little visited by the film, the press or by the hand of God, the mines of diamonds from Sierra Leone, the wars between rebels and the Government troops and the giant Guinea refugee camps. Solomon Vandy is an African family father who suffers in his flesh struggles between factions to control the power, and, above all, the mines. The rebels arrive in her village with their machine guns and give it to choose between "manga short or long sleeves", a macabre sarcasm with the have to choose where you will cut the hand. Chance or luck, takes him to work a diamond mine where is the stone that serves as a plot thread of the story. Everyone wants that diamond, but he just wants to return to be with his family.DiCaprio plays a mercenary without scruples that acts as an intermediary between Western greed and cruelty of African guerrillas. He changed arms for diamonds. In jail he heard an officer of diamond of Solomon and followed. DiCaprio plays the character can do more for returned.In a beach bar, DiCaprio meets the girl and discusses with her principles. It's the journalist who interprets Jennifer Connelly. Maddy Bowen represents the conscience, the West which wants to help, hope that someone do something to change things.The film is excessive, too long, too ambitious. After the generous show of war and despair Zwick returns to their messages, which is a form of contempt for history.You do not know very well who is "good", and that is a bug. It is the story of an African father looking for his family? Yes, but the father bother us when he stands in the purposes of the dealer. DiCaprio is the protagonist almost all the time, because we are concerned to get the piedar. We don't know why Solomon trusts him.We should expect the end to realize that the girl is good. The hollow voice that loose sentences of catechism was, the UNFPA, the star. There was a girl to make work a romance. It is actually not, to hold the banner that whites can fix Africa with a couple of laws. That maja, she. |
2,765 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3531 | Sandra Ríos | Ases calientes | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Despite the fact that it makes use of many aspects seen in other films, this story has much authenticity, footprint that wanted to impose and print its director is notorious. | Ases Calientes which he returned with the tape after the successful Narc movie of the year 2002 which chronicled the corruption of a police agency and made worthy to its director, Joe Carnahan, the Sudance Festival spirit award, and like the previous one, is its director and screenwriter. NARC was a film obasionada by the critics of recognized media written as "The New York Times", "Detroit News", "The New Yorker" among others.The previous film of this director was catalogued as a fairly complex drama and with the same nickname we can describe this new tape. "The last letter" title which is known in my country, is a film loaded with information, with an endomoniadamente agil, frenetic pace and action 100%. Since the beginning, already becomes inevitable fact evoke tapes as "Pulp Fiction" in 1994 and the sagas of "Kill Bill" 1 and 2 of the years 2003 and 2004, both of Quentin Tarantino. This happens not only by the Enigma that is handled, but for resources as black humor and al gore that in both cases, were so well delimited and use was so subtle suprementamente that never get to do uncomfortable to the Viewer; in fact, they give you one condiment for this film loaded with many elements at the same time. I'm not the only one to see "smokin' 'ace' reminded the Tarantino films, but if there are very few those who value the fact that the director dared to draw their own version of the tarantinesco genus and for this reason see it as one more copy. To my I particularly liked that he converted to the last letter in a revenge to the American very well thought-out and teaches us to introduce the use of gore in a subtle way is valid for whom we are not so happy of the.On the other hand how much rescue as the director tells the story; He weapon all a tangle in which involves an infinite number of characters with which enriches the plot, characters some more famous than others but with a profile very well marked and worked. From the experienced Andy Garcia, Ryan Reynolds, Ray Liotta, Jeremy Piven and the rookie singer hip-hop Alicia Keys enjoyed generally good performances. Bad debut of Keys by the way. Different thing with Ben Affleck who neither I mention because his appearance in the film is little and definitely does not convince me. With regard to Piven who plays Body, should be trained by an expert and so told with advice from a Scottish magician R.Paul Wilson and even as part of the entretamiento was a member of one of the most popular shows in Hollywood at the Club "The Magic Castle". Thanks to this arduous preparation, we can enjoy real scenes in which this actor shows us his ability acquired with the handling of the letters. Mounting and photography also are a highlight of the film. The shooting kept his magic filming in Lake Tahoe, a huge and Crystal Lake located between California and Nevada and was also scene of Coppola in the film the Godfather Part II, as also a place of recreation of Sinastra and his closest friends. Great tape is despite assemble everything a plot enredadísima with which it is sometimes mislead the public, in the end does not disappoint, because with immense ease with which grandmothers desenredan the strings of a seam, Carnahan Unveils us the final with an incredible surprise factor.Despite the fact that it makes use of many aspects seen in other films, this story has much authenticity, footprint that wanted to impose and print its director is notorious. A movie that I recommend for those lovers of action and gender políciaco. Hopefully will see more than once to enjoy it and understand it better. |
2,766 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4181 | José A. Peig | Rambo: acorralado | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Despite the little visual care by the filmmaker, is a film that knows where it wants to go, good pace and a few very bad grape-laden dialogues and raised points of view with respect to concepts such as hypocrisy, survival and the law of the strongest. | The hangover which is detrimental to a film as genuine as it is First Blood is the impersonal and telefílmica management of director Ted Kotcheff - which does not prevent it in a very fluent narrative and in which the information is very well detoxified - and from here started to value a product than for a long time it has been very poorly valued and interpreted by traditional critics, and that never reaches the masterpiece that must have been because of the imbalance between the magnificent writing (screenplay) and the mediocre pulse of the filmmaker (realization). Following this, round up some nuances: the story about a disturbed than sowing chaos in a small town montañés possesses some attributes more akin to melodrama or independent cinema with pretensions of social criticism which action film pure and hard. From this angle, say that work Kotcheff is not at the height of the content, although the picture of Andrew Laszlo helps create a staging absorbent and the hostile atmosphere (mist, storms) that characterizes two strata of the scenery and the same theme: nature versus civilization, the savage against the representatives of the law and order.First and foremost, we need to find out what the causes or the features that explain a priori insubstantial icon but that - you despite who gets upset - has withstood the passage of time. And a film that 26 years later it has not lost validity with regards to their intrinsic values and its impact on popular culture. As it could not be otherwise, the center of attraction is the archetype represented in John Rambo (Sylvester Stallone), the timeless figure of the wild that threatened the established order, and which has its optimum expression in images that open the film: a lonely man that moves along a path from the interior of the forest and in direction to the cameralooking lanky and slightly desvaída look. Essential musical accompaniment of Jerry Goldsmith, which warns us about the elegiac nature of the film, tears for a soul destroyed in the brutality of war.That scruffy profile, progressively discovered us as a mad man is a victim of past circumstances and present (attention to the used flashbacks). And this is the trait that best defines the uniqueness and the narrative First Blood claw: make the viewer feel empathy for the wild, and aversion to the forces of the order. We refer to an archetype that has its roots in universal history, from the Amorites in times of Summer and Akkad, passing by the barbarians that undermined the foundations of the Roman Empire, and the Taliban on our immediate present. All respond to the archetype of the wild native mountains (or inhospitable desert), those who hate civilization, threaten to invade and destroy the order. Therefore, the scheme of First Blood this built on this same mythology. John Rambo, the savage, and sherif, played by Brian Dennehy, defender of civilisation, which puts morals and customs that govern the lives of the people to the Rambo style, thus personifying the intolerance against some modes of life (in this case, the tramp) who are on the fringes of social conventions (is laughable to read some critics who see in this film a ultra-conservative speech)When Rambo is actually a countercultural icon of anarchy and rebellion against the majority speech. (Anyway, they are not born stupid, but they do). The viewer feels attraction by what fears him is unknown. Therein lies the key which explains the magnetism of this character: the disturbed facing illustrated law using the laws of nature. This profile of intelligence based on the domain of wild nature, the ancient survival instinct coupled with skill in the dirtiest guerrilla military strategy. There the law is you, but here I am the law. Rabidly anti-war film is the x-ray of a disturbed, a victim of the system that ends up rebelling against the order that has created it when - after his escape through the riddled with underground of rats and aided by the light of a torch - attends the people and destroys the electricity of the population with shrapnel, while recreating the sounds and the fear of the war with the burning of gunpowder. Following the metaphorical game, it is the savage who has come to destroy civilization.Ultimately, John Rambo is the icon that responds to an archetype of savagery, hostility, alienation, and not devoid of a romantic look. Yes, that classical romanticism, of the marginalized and the Bohemian beatnick of the loser, and although here he alludes to those who failed in vietnam, the spirit beat is somehow part of the character. First Blood is a fierce metaphor for American society that fears to the wild but creates it in order to defend the civilization of those wild peoples that threaten it, to finally pursue it and condemn it to madness. And despite the little visual care by the filmmaker, is a film that knows where it wants to go, good pace and a few very bad grape-laden dialogues and raised points of view with respect to concepts such as hypocrisy, survival, the law of the strongest minority against the law of the weakest despite being most. |
2,767 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/493 | Silvia Giner | Ultravioleta | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Ultraviolet is Ultramala, for some time that did not see something like this. We have everything: pathetic sentences, subliminal insults to the Viewer, pathetic interpretations, inconsistencies in the story, the list is very long. | Well, sorry for my dear readers these days since the release have been very moviditos and I have not had time to get me to write, but here I am again. Let's talk about ultraviolet for those who do not know is the last crappy, I say. Mila Jovochich (5th element) film.What surprised me most of the film is the theme, I think we were all checked, no one imagined that the thing was victimized vampire. Ultraviolet is Ultramala, for some time that did not see something like this (from the Avengers of UMA THURMAN) and Mila we love, we love, is very good, is wonderful, it has surpassed as an actress, if, and if, we know, but fuck, I, this humble servant wants to know why all his films have "Crappy Danger" label on the cover. This girl could take you more advantage of interpretative, but extremely beautiful and as now claro.es takes the vulgarity only offer shit scripts.Plays will end up as Charlize Therón, having to produce their own movie (Monster) so they respect as an actress and have option to Oscar which in fact was (well deserved).In ultraviolet, is pathetic todo.frases, subliminal insults the Viewer, pathetic interpretations (clear with that script), inconsistencies in the story, the list is very long.If I have to admit that the production and effects both the fighting and the action scenes melee are phenomenal, this Yes.But. My God the dash is bad it is awful, I have no words, be careful if you are going to see her not going to suffer a cerebral aneurysm with phrases so master as "Come from a world that you can understand not perhaps".that horror! The soundtrack of The Cramberrys XDGenial. |
2,768 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1718 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Vivir | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The God of small things, that little God that not attributed to any religious doctrinaire, guide this secular Catechism of irrepressible vital breath. A masterpiece, an absolute masterpiece. | This was a boring man, a taciturn, frankly boring life, proud bureaucrat have not missed a single day to work in 30 years of performance. He was a man without options, without desires, desire to thrive without consent no novelty that tambalee this routine beautiful, unchanged, all large and small pains of the world outside. He was a man without priorities, always surrounded by mountains of papers, in a monumental crisis, which he is unknown, because simply not reason the sorry state of his gray existence. This is a man who receives the news of her cancer. And how this revelation infused life its shake-up precarious, its unfortunate demise and their monotonous transit for days. Here is when Watanabe, the revitalized ill, decides to make "social work" and built a park in the neighborhood.To learn to love the film, must see this film and prendar of formal perfection and the lyricism of the scene of the swing (and the sad song) or the concatenation of the subjective of the own Watanabe level and his son watching how a cart carries the casket of the mother. live! It is also a film of Kurosawa, full of very brief flashbacks of fragmentary notes of the plot, which seems, at times, an Italian neorealism film full of Japanese.So who thought Kurosawa was Rashomon or the seven Samurai or the hidden fortress, here also has a gem to the Capra, an absolute Ode to life, despite the sadness so great that it is found in the long footage from the tape. !Masterpiece!(And to be the first classical Japanese film this scribe has seen, the thing has begun with excellent right foot) More and better tomorrow. |
2,769 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/524 | Matías Cobo | Monster house | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A single objection I can put this story of adventures and fear, able to be funny to children and adults alike. | Monster House is, at least for those who subscribed to these lines, the best tape released animation in what we carry year. And I think not exaggerate if I qualify her as a pioneer in the assumption of a, the horror genre's own aesthetic and thematic patterns, just employees so far in the animation. I.e., that Monster House, still a tape suitable for all audiences, would be the first of its kind filmed as if it were horror film. Without leaving aside the usual aventuras-humor tandem in the animation of the past years, there are continuous winks to referents film of the genre of fear in Monster House. Haunted House, fear a mysterious neighbor suspected hide terrifying secrets (reminded me the crazy not to kill the neighbor, with Tom Hanks), anonymous and threatening calls to the telephone, the concurrence of strange events on Halloween and some other aspects, such as the setting and camera movements, are debtor a very different from the animation film.Even jobs to look for more Parallels, the hat-trick of researchers formed by these pre-teens reminds the endearing Goonies, with very different profiles for each character. DJ would be brave and skilled researcher; Croquette, stocky, funny friend and little supporter of exercise of Hero instead of risking his own skin; and Jenny, the girl which both long and who will put some sanity in the group. The own characterization of Nebbercracker, an old stooped face enjuto and fearsome and dressed in harapientos clothes, also we are familiar. And the comic point exploits through picturesque side as the geek-pizzero Skull, a twenties specialist in video games and comics that will attend DJ and company to ask for advice, Kangaroo Zee and her boyfriend Bones or a pair of clueless cops.The graphic treatment of Monster House demonstrates that, in digital animation, there is always room for further surprising each new film. Apart from the magnificent treatment of textures, this film stands out for their agile movements of camera and a careful atmosphere perfect to introduce in its proposal of mystery. But the main virtue of this film directed by Gil Kenan newcomer, and chartered by the Fox of Spielberg and Zemeckis (who missed with Polard Express), lies in its magnificent and intelligent script. A single objection I can put this story of adventures and fear, able to be funny to children and adults alike. Although go to stereotypes seen in hundreds of tapes of terror, the true story behind this monstrous House is quite original and unpredictable. If you want to discover it, accompanying DJ and company during his singular adventure. The fun is guaranteed. |
2,770 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/187 | Sr. Ruso | V de Vendetta | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Do assume?V for Vendetta? as an anarchist, it is little more than surprising | I just found out the interesting action perpetrated by the collective of workers cultural La Felguera. 12 April last, during the screening of the film "V for Vendetta". Activists of the anarchist movement, took advantage of the distraction of Madrid Ideal theaters security guards and held the action of replacing the information leaflets of the film, which under a purely movie buff background, explained the plot of the play, as well as references and inspirations of this in other films by others that the collective had been made respecting the same format but where the text had changedadapting it to instruct the absent-minded spectator of the work to which approached watch.Assume "V for Vendetta" as an anarchist work, is little more than surprising, even more if we take into account that it is designed as the work of a multinational that only to enrich themselves using any kind of pretext, while he gets his hand in his pockets to a few spectators left in the ignominy. Reproduce them a fragment of the enlightening text made by the collective: "." Everyone frantically seeks his style and his identity and the false belief in this alleged return to the inner life and nature (soy, zen, culture East.) when what is to more and better new products of consumption because the market transforms and adapts each time more quickly to new conditions. "Today, the rebellion is another form of consumption and"V for Vendetta"is of course, and also the result of this equation."Do not forget to come to the page of the collective, where you will find many more desveladores data regarding this and many other issues, part of the original synopsis to download in .pdf format and the suplantada by the collective. |
2,771 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/185 | Pablo | Misión imposible 3 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | We are probably in the best film of the trilogy due to the effective mix of action and dramatic intrigue | J.j. Abrams is inaugurated in the world of the film with a film of action very in line with the American series that are succeeding today. We are probably in the best film of the trilogy due to the effective mix of action and dramatic intrigue. The way to lead the viewer along the plot very well structured which leads us to return to be able to enjoy unexpected turns of script, technical who had disappeared in the second installment. The role of Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) this very accomplished, giving a much more humane approach, because that is left to lead in many situations by the emotions and feelings, yet their instinct of secret agent takes control of any situation as if it were a reflex Act. Mission impossible on this occasion is neither more nor less to rescue a captured IMF agent while he was spying on an international dealer of weapons and information (Philip Seymour Hoffman), has no conscience or remorse. The agent in question was the pupil of Hunt which still yet withdrawn decides to perform the mission by all means she for the. This time it's personal.J.J. Abrams says that the writing staff put a commitment special when creating a bad worthy of Ethan Hunt, one that was at the height of the hero. "It is the first time that Ethan Hunt is faced with an adversary so terrifying, intelligent, and mysterious as the character played by Philip Seymour Hoffman," says the director.I forgot to highlight family that becomes, once again, to see again work closely to Ethan and Luther. The chemistry and good friendship that exists between them is one of the more humorous of the entire film. It is likely that the director is not created a work at the level of the carried just by Brian de Palma, partly due to the lack of ex officio, but what if that note is the fact, that succeeded in appropriating the essence of the series much better than both of their atecesores. After seeing the film sales of cinema with tachycardia.Finally it should be noted that all the action scenes has been carried out by the own Tom Cruise without help of doubles. "So I think part of the challenge of making a film," said Tom Cruise. "Does there is no risk for no reason, but if one can train and do something to provide credibility to the film-?""Do well, makes it really?-, viewers are passed it better". |
2,772 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/368 | Tito Chinchan | Garfield 2 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film for more kids not too bored to parents. A sequel that improves more than the original. | Lately only us they reach screens sequels and prequels you of more or less successful films. Why do they not make new films? Man, one basic reason is that the publicity already have made. It is not the same having to announce the fat Orange first cat as it is a sequel to the first. More cheap, and also know that they have full movie theaters. Fortunately, in the case we are dealing with today, the sequel is much better than the original.The film is about two fat cats and oranges. One of them, lives in United States and lives with his "master" (in quotes) and a dog named Oddie puppy. The other lives in Britain and is the owner of a castle and an immense fortune. Of course not known, and more of course still mix their lives at any given time.I have to say that I liked the film and I laughed several times. The script is not original, but the smallest of the House tend to not be very critical in that regard. Situations that recreate are pretty well, making him grace even to older. The moment of truth farm animals is more than that for me it enough, but good. Human beings are very prototypical, with the bad very evil on par with silly, and the rest do not learn anything. And the special effects are very accomplished, only used with two cats, which seem more true that some farm animals.In short, film for more kids not too bored to parents. A sequel that improves more than the original. |
2,773 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4164 | Pruden Rodríguez | Jóvenes ocultos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Lost boys is a reference in the film of vampirism. Despite its obvious flaws of approach, it is today considered as a cult film for its innovation. | Lost boys (Joel Schumacher, 1987) could happen to oblivion as a mediocre movie that is, by its very simple structure, flat characters and their approach infantilón. The proposal by the American director, however, achieved some success in the long run. Bet to give a twist to the vampire subgenre and today is, for many, a film of cult and the propositions of big titles of vampire theme. Be that as it may, the truth is that in its attempt to attract adolescents toward this type of film, Schumacher managed to combine several elements that have made to remain in the collective memory as a different, special film.History, of course, is not one of its strengths. Lost Boys narrates the adventures and misadventures of two brothers that are installed with his mother (recently divorced) in the quiet city of Santa Carla. Soon echo the rumors that run on the existence of vampires and have the opportunity to check are not just rumors. Biker youngsters become his worst nightmare of the day in the morning. Michael, brother major (played by Jason Patric) gets seduced by the young Star (Jami Gertz) biker and puts in this way his younger brother Sam (Corey Haim) in a crazy fight to rid him of the "dark side".So what were those elements for which is today remembered? There were several (more or less wanted) ingredients blended to obtain the magic formula. One of them, undoubtedly, was his humorous, thug, informal, informal tone. Lost boys could be compared with the impact of "The Goonies" in the adventure genre (in fact Corey Feldman, better known as "Bocazas", comes in both films). It's films that have managed to keep the traditional elements and on the other hand give a fresh air. Thus, in lost boys can laugh with phrases as "my own brother is a vampire of shit, you'll see when MOM learned" and after a while spend a few tense minutes observing the gang of bikers led by David (Kiefer Sutherland). Vampires can no longer be in castles and, in addition, can laugh without giving up their dose of night terror.Another of the ingredients for success (their relative success) was aesthetics. Eighties costumes bikers, own motorcycles, to the latest fashion hairstyles (now obviously outdated), the nightlife, alcohol, girls, beach. they formed a mirror for many young people at that time and today are a pleasant picture which recreate. Add to this another ingredient: the impressive soundtrack (with groups such as Aerosmith Songs) and the less sought after of all the elements: the curiosities. Over time have passed to the category of legend players such as Corey Haim and Corey Feldman (friends with the same name, which were youth stars and then saw to fall sharply their careers). For both, it was the last film that gained some standing. The fact happened between Jason Patric and Keifer Sutherland was also known. After forging a close friendship during the filming, the first he "took" the bride from the second (was Julia Roberts) and things between them were not so well since then.In short, lost boys is a film bound vision, but at this point can leave indifferent. A note for the nostalgic: "Lost Boys 2: The Tribe", which premieres this 2008 is being prepared. In this sequel, and more curiosities: Corey Feldman ("Bocazas") and a member of the family participates Sutherland. By the way, not expect to see in our cinemas. Probably nowhere. |
2,774 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/397 | José Córdoba | Alatriste | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Alatriste is a tedium, a medley of disjointed scenes and characters without a soul. I just hope that the team is run good holidays during the filming because I assume that 24 million euros will be spent on that. | Last night saw the highly anticipated, promocionadísima, expensive, Alatriste of Agustín Díaz Yanes based on the works of Arturo Pérez Reverte. The result? You could qualify him disappointment, although having read everything that I have read these days, my dream to see the film had decreased significantly. But let's go by parts, narrates Alatriste, no, it is not the right word, shows, Yes this Yes, moments of the life of Captain Diego Alatriste, a species of soldier of Fortune during the reign of Philip IV and the condeduque of Olivares. Already from the first frame of the movie you can see that this will not be an adventure film to use, by the employment of the format 1.85 rather than the usual for this style of production 2. 35: 1. Come on, that its projection on the screen not full movie film. Díaz Yanes said several times during the promotion is not a film action but characters. This phrase justifies the use of the 1.85, which is more intimate and is used by directors like Spielberg (though not in its Indiana Jones saga) or Shyamalan. The Fox fanfare announces the beginning of the film, this is the good, my grandmother would say I wish were true. But not. Alatriste is not a film, is a trailer, a greatest hits, a medley. Narrativamente is a non-existent film, the scenes occur offline, no flow, there is no cohesion, a narrative. The film is not moving forward, jumps. And the problem does not lie in attempting to make the best of the five books (other films have done something similar and do not suffer from this), but in not having written a script able to baste everything. Thus, the film is extremely episodic, devoid of rhythm. This sensation does not help the direction of Díaz Yanes (also author of the screenplay, by the way) who seems not to shoot a film, but film actors. Its realization is flat, there are no open levels, omnipresent being the median plane of the actors, so that apart from the actors little more is seen on screen. Or a plane of crane, just a couple of drawings in movement, the plano-contraplano rest, or not even that. Really for an address as well, no need to spend 24 million euros, because, overall, not going to see anyone. An example to illustrate to the reader, of similar achievements, would be any movie of those issuing A3 on weekends and, even so, dare I say, most are narrated with more imagination. Ah, but of course, this is a film of characters, why has shot as well. Nothing wrong except for the small detail that in this film just there is a character, the rest are stereotypes when not simple sketches or simply extras with phrase. Alatriste is a character, more or less well defined, is a man whose maximum is the honour, and is for many years, because the character does not evolve throughout the film, the rest are what they seem, i.e.: the child true to his amo(Unax_Ugalde), but reckless, faithful Squire (Eduard Fernández), critical writer with the system (Juan Echanove), calculator women but kind-hearted (Elena Anaya, a character impossible to understand), etc. It is impossible to know more about them than this and to do so since neither need two and a half hours. Nothing remarkable performances, Viggo Mortessen has a great physical presence as Alatriste, but disappears at the moment that begins to speak, where takes out an accent and a stop someone who is neither Spanish nor has this language as a language materna(no_es_por_nada,_pero_¿los_americanos_cogerían,_yo_qué_sé,_a_Antonio_Banderas_para_interpretar_Hamlet?). The rest just highlight Eduard Fernández, Juan Echanove (unrecognizable as Quevedo) and Javier House (surprising as the condeduque). Ariadna Gil, does not give the pego, his interpretation of the dog in the Manger during a scene of the film is embarrassed by anachronistic resulting.Technical paragraphs are correct, highlighting the costumes, the art direction, it seemed not bad, but come on, it is not much, so I could not tell, but at least that transmits the decay, the dirt of the time. The picture has moments very buenos(en_concreto_una_escena_de_Ariadna_Gil_y_Mortessen,_muy_bella), others regular and other malos(la_lucha_en_el_barco), is also not consistent and there are a couple of scenes that appear to be made by another technical team. Roque Baños music is repetitive and lacking strength, also employs the undependable Spanish guitar. However, the Sword fight scenes are well choreographed, and at least the realization does not bother. However the battle scenes are embarrassed, which are very cortitos goodness. Special mention for the attack on the ship, which as it has been shot not conceals at all the fact of having been filmed on the Mainland. So clumsy he becomes curious Yanes.Es Díaz, the film as a whole reminds me the Kenneth Branagh Hamlet, not its full version but the trailer for two hours premiered in Spain. Although really only reminds me that movie in the jumps of the narrative, the lack of fluidity, because in the rest of aspects the Branagh film is very high and this is also a film of characters, but filmed in 70 mm.We are closing, Alatriste is a tedium, a medley of disjointed scenes and characters without a soul. I just hope that the team is run good holidays during the filming because I assume that 24 million euros will be spent on that. |
2,775 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3101 | Oscar Cantero | El abominable doctor Phibes | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A movie that combines elements of several different film genres, ranging from suspense and horror to comedy, through on tiptoe for drama and a little bit of terror. | Reading about one of my favorite actors, the enormous Joseph Cotten, I found by chance with a 1971 film the abominable Dr. Phibes, who had only seen once, many years ago, at the festival of cinema scope of Cádiz, during a monograph of Vincent Price.Con an aesthetic halfway between the film and the comic book heroes and villainsThis film, directed by Robert Fuese, combines a variety of styles and trends, that although it is basically a thriller film, we find it several comic winks and a setting that at certain times may seem somewhat grotesque, though it must be taken into account in those years was played a lot with figurative shantytowns, and the overloaded was more or less usual.An aspect that draws attention is the characterization of Vincent Price, who plays the role of a doctor terribly disfigured by a traffic accident, and who can only talk through loudspeakers that connects to the neck through a connector (as if a walkman). Everything about this character is to put it in some way, the part Surrealist film, that it's an insane eccentric made help by a woman that always goes dressed in costumes of feathers with layer, and who lives surrounded by dolls that make up a ghostly Orchestra.Joseph Cotten, conversely, is a doctor that helps the police to solve a series of murders without apparent relation, and as always, it exudes elegance and acting ability, even without this being one of the papers lucky shell of the third man, among other many masterpieces.From the technical point of view, the film is not much, but it is curious to see the gadgets used doctor Phibes for their wickedness. The same applies to the script, which has stoppages play too heavy at times, with some scenes that extend well over the due.In any case, is an entertaining film impregnated with the nostalgia that causes see great performers already disappeared, and with the added attraction of viewing the presence of elements of comedy, suspense and the drama within a same story. |
2,776 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3575 | Andrés Pons | Silvidos de muerte | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The transformation of the protagonist with some oniric dreams with the appearances of the reptiles that as there were real giving the verisimilitud at all times. | Terror use on several occasions the fearsome reptiles with better or worse luck, mordisco mortal, snakes on the plane or the remarkable STANLEY are perhaps the best-known films of this subgenre.In the early 1970s a director specializing in television with a magnificent product of terror behind him "BLACK NOON" where has already demonstrated a very special talent to create really unpleasant frames accompanied by asphyxiating atmospheres.Only death whistle was a popular actor, all know DIRK BENEDICT for his character in the team a. out of the series fame seems a magnificent actor b horror series highlighting good jobs in W or infernal cruise.The only others are average amateur actors with some other movie behind him. From the start we know that you it's a product of a tiny budget so the technical part is pretty mediocre, not a script that oozes originality by the four sides leads to a nightmare of frightening proportions.The transformation of the protagonist with some oniric dreams with the appearances of the reptiles that as there were real giving the verisimilitud at all times.A little gem aided by a given address of its author and good performances. |
2,777 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4195 | Iñaki Bilbao | Mal gesto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Entertaining film Israeli, well done although somewhat repetitive. | "Michael Klienhouse is the typical neighbour model, married and with a child." One day, on the morning of the day of Holocaust, Michael collides with the car of Dreyfus. Tamar, the wife of Michael, makes an obscene gesture to Dreyfus and this accelerates your vehicle and crashes into the open door of Michael, being about to strike at Tamar. As a good citizen, Michael hopes to resolve the situation with the help of the authorities, but turns out the sixties Dreyfus, a former war hero, is a violent man well-connected and influential friends. Michael, which is mired in a personal crisis, it is difficult to give in to the "power", so the following days will become a real nightmare. "However, their fight against a corrupt and violent reality which endangers his life and freedom will finally breathe a new meaning to life". Entertaining film Israeli, well done although somewhat repetitive.It's an atypical history, with both physical and verbal violence, whereas something lasts in some moments from every point of view.Not bored in no time and the argument follows easily, but it is also true that everything seems a little joke and one not just believe everything that happens.However, maintains the tension at all times, with even intrigue and some suspense, but I think that you am not convinced at all at the end. By the way that the end is spectacular and there was at the International Film Festival of Donostia (2007) that saw, applause, but it is exaggerated and although plausible, incredible.I said, is not bad, but not well. |
2,778 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/925 | Jose Contreras | Happy feet | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Mumble Happy Feet begins as the ugly duckling. In a world of singing penguins, he can't sing, knows to move his feet. You will learn how to sing and be one Penguin or will demonstrate the value of their individual art? Okay, I accept that the outcome was sung. | Aesop, La Fontaine, Iriarte, the three liked do talk to the animals to thrill to humans, usually at the expense of morals. Morals are past fashion, those cocks dry, cigarette ashes, as it called Juan Ramón, already dislike. Cartoons bugs we enthuse with their journeys rather than their lessons.Mumble Happy Feet begins as the ugly duckling. In a world of singing penguins, he can't sing, knows to move his feet. You will learn how to sing and be one Penguin or will demonstrate the value of their individual art? Okay, I accept that the outcome was sung. But the film offers much more. "Happy Feet" is not only worth seeing because it exceeds the roll of la moraleja. It is interesting by the social background. There is a conflict between the singing penguins and other smaller breed that is bent by Cubans. And the conflict is narrated in music form. The singing penguins do ballads, while small bring mambo and Latin rhythms. So the leaders of the tribe were priests and defenestran to the mischief elements of the herd. Here begins the journey of the hero, a narrative schema which has not stopped working since the Odisea.La reading of the final is the most modern, speaks of the power of communication to change societies and transform the world.There are many things for an hour and a half, and a reasonable price. All calling us the movie is to forget what are all these dances and songs: are the result of a tradition that begins with Fred Astaire passes by the Beach Boys Michael Jackson and the Blues and comes to Ricky Martin. They are not voices emerging from inside of each Penguin and with which expresses its interior. |
2,779 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3595 | Rafa Ferrer | Bichos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A tape to be revisit to see the history of animation, from one Prism less critical and more passionate, and is that we create or not, all of pixar this into our hearts. | Now, thanks to the "Ratatouille" DVD I have been compiling little by little Pixar films, I decided to revisit the tape of John Lasseter, certainly the tape, will meet 10 years the next year, has lost some of the luster that animation is concerned, which is that the animation of the ants, mind-bogglingly before now achieved remains sad and plastic; you have to see what progress has been made the animation (and digital effects) in this period of time; In addition, the effects of water, tapes as "Cars" or "Ratatouille" (the most recent) or even in "The Incredibles" or "Buscando a Nemo".Although the history, message, quite well achieved has not lost bellows (maybe this "buenrollo" Disney that drive all tapes of Pixar) and I like to think, or believe that perhaps someday will Pixar make a tape that does not end with the Happy End we are accustomed.On the other hand, characters have enough charisma so that each one can choose his favorite from ladybug, until the flea, passing through the Woodlice, ants or the evil grasshoppers.In short: A tape to be revisit to see the history of animation, from one Prism less critical and more passionate, and is that we create or not, all of pixar this into our hearts. |
2,780 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2999 | José Antonio Bermúdez | Sicko | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Moore put again the finger in the wound. And does it so in the only way that can do: waking up to the Viewer. This time focuses, more than ever, people and how is attentive to the only inviolable right: life. Of course in a country where the death penalty is in force, the rest is smoke. | The doctor kills because there is a system that endorses, supports, and rewards it. Michael Moore put again the finger in the wound. And does it so in the only way that can do: waking up to the Viewer. So his speech becomes extreme, with all the dangers that entails. Moore is, in this sense, honest. It proposes a hypothesis and is, by all means, show it and forgetting demonstrate this. And this is, possibly, his virtue, and for many others, the cause of their discredited (is here when we speak of "manipulator" Moore).The Moore character, in a media-globalized world, has transcended the borders of its complaint. Something local, such as problems in American society (arms sales as cause of the high levels of violence the corruption behind the invasion of Iraq; the relocation of companies.), globalizing in relation to an occidental-capitalista society - consumer. The drawback: a feature of a society become everybody's problem. And it is that that country called United States, as a rule, is the main transmitter of Western values. Hence, the main speaker of the criticisms of Moore have produced in Cannes, Toronto, etc. And, do in his country not hear you? To refute this idea, Moore presented these days in Canadian land CAPTAIN MIKE ACROSS AMERICA. Once again, Mike tries to "show" the tour against Bush in 2004, 62 cities toured in 45 days and in which came to meet, in a single night, more than 10,000 people. Moore tired of being the only one in speak up, tells us that it is not the only one in his country to have a critical view.Critique of Moore always to the system. A system which acts on how pernicious and alienating people. Simplistically, an American buys arms because the system "sells" fear. Now, a doctor kills because system rewards you for that reason. Moore shown in SICKO. Behind, business linked to a system of American health care, by all means, is the greater profit against the health of their clients. All the constraints to not treat a disease in extreme situation, not cure the "Heroes" in the 11-S. absolute privatization of a company in the conglomeration of a country that forgets to persons and advocates the benefits of an elite (the same that selling arms, give the order to invade countries).Moore tries to show. To do this, it is able to compare: public health in United Kingdom and France; and how are "cured", for free, the American heroes in hospitals in the greater enemy, Cuba. This time focuses, more than ever, on the personas.en victims. And how is attentive to the only inviolable right: life. Of course in a country where the death penalty is in force, the rest is smoke. |
2,781 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1404 | Tito Chinchan | Eyes wide shut | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Strange film that closes the cycle Stanley Kubrick, who proposed to make one of each gender. This is the "mental straw" gender that will go down in history by the censorship which had, by Nikole in balls and by the tremendous celebration that reflects that it leaves you thinking "why have I those friends?" | Watch that he had "seen" times this movie. Specifically could say it that the film is an aunt with fat tits, then Nicole coming out vistiendose, then smoke a joint and are goats, then there are in a huge orgy, finally a woman is dead to end suddenly. Because today have seen it with my half Zucchini and it is that you between the moments of jumping nipple breasts also had dialogue. What madness.The film is a typical American family, where he is a prestigious medical father of a family with a daughter. It is that his marital life is something cold, which have small extramarital tryst ending no curdling. Total, smoke a joint and she tells him that he has an erotic dream with a sailor that gives gustito there. He obfuscates and goes vague by the city with prostitutes and pianists, until it reaches the orgy. And little more happens, ah, if that then get a type that looks like Cesar Alierta (viva don Cesar gives us eating, living).After reading the synopsis, you need to make critical? The film is the kind that everything is hinted but said nothing. Of these as I would say Gila "here someone has killed someone" by what I have not heard well. It looks like the script isn't concluso, that it has cut, or is for intelligent people. The photographic subject, therefore very cool, with good levels of female breasts that defy the basic laws of gravity. The theme song a little more rare, at times thought that my neighbor was playing the piano of the balls, with chan chaaaan resembling when you throw a cat on a piano. And the end is one of those Chin pún, its finished. No you've heard? Ah, feels.In short, strange film that closes the cycle Stanley Kubrick, what is proposed to make one of each gender. This is the "mental straw" gender that will go down in history by the censorship which had, by Nikole in balls and by the tremendous celebration that reflects that it leaves you thinking "why have I those friends?". |
2,782 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2022 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Shortbus | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Visual poem by syncopated orgasms and metaphysical cramps. I.e., a hodgepodge of little utility that just forgetting without excessive effort. | Hedonistic Divertimento worthy of include jewelry freaks of the year, capricho indie of dubious artistic taste that appeals to the curiosity and a supposed and indomitable freedom of artistic expression to give us a generous helping of free meat, several fornicios and autofelaciones with Manhattan Fund. None of these Visual licenses helps nothing notable that raise crude in this film desprejuicidado simple, tiresome and, occasionally, tone and I proud of his porn label narrative or intelligent, but hollow, enfangado in a metaphysical drift of balance of cheap, where the character dissected their schizophrenias, they exorcizan their vices and even infringe lubricious contorsionismos so amazing that they don't know one if it attends to a pedlícula or a cabaretero-circense show for seniors, idle and extruding. Everything is by denying inhibition, abolish the modesty, psychoanalyze powders in morning with smooth jazz as playful sound pillow.I do not know yet whether the project is simply dirty or is exotic or film artie hippies resonances. I do not know if this militancy is healthy in the voyeuristic or any aesthetic diversion (I will not say moral) in variegated, vulgar entertainment and kitsch of this plastic universe of individuals tellurically troubled by existential suffocation of sex. Freud catch them.Without being a hodgepodge of film, it is dispensable. Without being absurd, it is obscene. As if to Woody Allen, in a hebreo-burlesca paranoia, it occurred encabritar to their usual morons and put them to ride young girls and boys while the city in the background beats as an unborn baby cast by the jazz. |
2,783 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1899 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Al final de la escapada | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Imperfect, addictive, at the end of the escape is a film within the film, black film, classical resonances but here incorporated in agitated 1960s in Paris... A gem! | They were the times of the Cahiers du Cinema. Nouvelle vague. Truffaut. Chabrol. Sartre, Camus, Existentialism, the Algeria war: not a moveable feast. The first foundations of a unstoppable consumerist society. Humphrey Bogart flying over the dormers of the Latin quarter. A blonde with short hair and tight black selling in the Champs Elysées Herald Tribune meshes. A Merry bon-vivant, Playboy gañán and atolondrado, verbose and sentimental, he transgress without malice and that, invariably, grant you any sympathy. At the end of the escape, death in the asphalt, the betrayal. Before: a beautiful black-and-white: Paris has never been filmed in this way. Before: a love story climb naïve of tone at the time. Inside: a Greek tragedy or a Shakespearean drama. Jean Paul Belmondo is a Hamlet of the underworld, a declared fan of the black gender archetypes that offer films that shadowed in his life journey. Jean Seberg is absolutely timeless beauty, the beauty and an image that exceeds the rigour of the years. Bebop: syncopated jazz, jazz newly lighting in America salpimentando the agile movements of the camera, which seems to also move as spurred by music. Stealth love, secret love, love fou. The flight to Rome, that won't be possible. Non-renewable betrayal. Out of breath. Michel Poiccard cares a little about dying: only wants to sleep with her American girl. |
2,784 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2739 | Kiko de España | Escuela de pringaos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Approved by the hairs and the soundtrack, because the last 20 minutes are very poor. Could that the American comedy is bottoming it be? | Todd Phillips is of my tea. First because I like Road Trip more sympathetic to American Pie, second, because Old School is the closest thing to Animal House that I've done in the last decade and third because Starsky & Hutch worked in the end.School for pringá I (memorable again the Lord of translations) is a failed attempt of wild comedy because it is so comedy nor is as wild as expected of team Phillips-Armstrong, almost infallible to date.The movie is not a pain in the ass, but is long (107 minutes of comedy are many even for Virgin at 40) and it does not have the necessary amount of good gags for that duration, only on the balls of painting and the joke with Moby stick out from the rest.Heder should begin to select their roles a little because if not going you to happen so that a Thornton that here seems to play the same role as in the imminent Mr.Woodcock. Despite all this year Heder has made an ideal partner with Will Ferrell in Blades of Glory. A little too bland.Approved by the hairs and the soundtrack, because the last 20 minutes are very poor.PS: do could be that American comedy is bottoming, does no one to seen the awful trailer for last of the Farrelly?? |
2,785 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2452 | El vengador toxico | Historia de un crimen | 4 | 5 | muchocine | An absolutely essential film this summer, without stridence showing us a complex portrait of characters around a violent murder. | Interestingly, this film has a more appropriate title in Spanish, in English. It's the follow-up made Truman Capote the crime of a family of rich farmers in the American Midwest. This follow-up dragged on for five years and led to us masterpiece "in cold blood".The film begins with a series of scenes that show the integration of Capote in high society New York at the time. During the footage, there are moments which shows these characters a kind of interview to qualify actions by the writer.I do not know as it was in fact the true Truman. Here occurs with an effeminate pose and a few "outfits" more picturesque, causing a dramatic contrast with the sobriety of a traditional American conservative city. This serves as a base to funny moments that are splashing the first part of the film, rather than the tone becomes more dramatic.When you stop the murderers starts the real core of the film, which is the relationship with them to reflect accurately in his book, and as emotional involvement is making a dent in the writer.The role of Capote is beautifully portrayed by Toby Jones (I have not seen the movie "Capote" of the añopasado, so I do not know if better or worse), showing a character complex, capable of displaying frivolous, incisive or tremendously sympathetic, as required by the occasion. Exemplary is the scene of food of Christmas where he began to creep into the closed rural society.An important pillar of the movie is the relationship with Nelle Harper Lee, childhood friend and writer of great success (what Truman causes a certain amount of professional jealousy). It is a support for the writer outside his high society circles. And is superbly played by Sandra Bullock, actress me has always fallen sympathetic, but to which I have never seen in a great performance, so far.But certainly, the other character is that of the murderer Perry Smith, with Daniel Craig also immense, totally away from her last performance as James Bond.Una absolutely essential film this summer, without stridence shows a complex portrait of characters around a violent murder. |
2,786 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/422 | Kiko de España | Waiting | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Pleasant surprise unpretentious even tries to, it seems, to become Clerks. | Marching (Waiting! 2005, Rob McKittrick) is a pleasant surprise unpretentious even tries to, it seems, to become Clerks. Because here are governed by the vulgar joke (well, with Clerks, but this is more americanada) and that, friends, I like. It is rather more fun than expected, and above all, rather more cerda.Ryan Reinolds continues too rubbing his tick, but now he has behind him a great group of Misfit professionals who give the best of themselves, especially that cachondísimo (in all aspects) Luis Guzmán, that, as I said "serious criticism", it is the only thing that is worth of a movie where everything else is zafiedad. But if the most uncouth of the movie he is!I know from experience that much of critics that cover these productions they write them without seeing them. The criticism in the country or in your cool Guide On Madrid demonstrate this. Brrr, me hot. The case is that if you want to be ninety minutes with a smile on his face and not complicate your much the evening the movie it comes but that very well. A 7.PD: Anna Faris, I love you. |
2,787 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1191 | Rafa Ferrer | Get rich or die tryin | 2 | 5 | muchocine | These tapes, as well as the romantic comedies or tapes of Terror are always cut by the same pattern, is that they seem to "materials" of the of Fernando León de Aranoa but plan "A Americanitos foot". | Curtis Hanson-"8 mile" opened a "new trend" in the film, "the films of rappers", tapes that tell us the ups and downs, adventures or misadventures of types are not "Sisters of charity" and trying to escape their misery they put in this rap where any bad, with his "hiphopper" cap and his wide pants boyarmed with a "pipe" you can setup a "massacre of the cagalse" and where trainees from "GTA S.Andreas" prevailing "ball" causing a strange law of the jungle where wins the "negrata" with the worst face of animal.Anyway, I believe above I've beaten my own record "quoted" words, let's the film, more, one starring "50 cent" in some parts makes face of circumstances, other side of bad and other face of penalty, the worst thing is that this guy (like Eminem in "8 mile") has the same expressiveness as a brick and where almost matter more selling the soundtrack of the film that the raise more or less at the box office.And is that the tapes, as well as the romantic comedies or tapes of Terror are always cut by the same pattern, is that they seem to "materials" of the of Fernando León de Aranoa but plan "A Americanitos foot".Anyway, that I have not discovered anything new and who has thought to see it, that it sticks to what there is (more, less, or trap or cardboard). |
2,788 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4241 | Francisco Bellón | La Escafandra y la Mariposa | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The Diving Bell and the butterfly is an ode to the tenacity of the human being, which is able to fight the largest of adversity and win it without more aid than the own force of will and the desire to live. | Long French cinema not obtained many awards and recognitions at the international level, and is that there are three French films nominated for the Academy Awards, and the three are added a whopping eight nominations, including some to the most important such as address or adapted screenplay awards. And that Persepolis failed candidacy for best language film not Inglesa.En the neighbouring country perhaps still must be wondering why not selected to the Diving Bell and the butterfly that represent them at the Oscars, given the nomination of Julian Schnabel for Best Director has won among others. With similar ingredients, there is no doubt that we are facing one of the most eagerly awaited films in these first months of 2008. The first impression is that you it's a sea inside French, most by an innate Association of ideas than by real similarities between both films, which are very different. The film is first and foremost a singing strength of will of human beings, and the brave fight against adversity. It is a touching, and emotional story that does not fall in the easy sentimentality or melodrama. Since the beginning of the tape, Julian Schnabel transmitted to the viewer the feeling of being trapped in the body itself, although this can also take in entering the story altogether. The pace is perhaps too slow, as well as the duration, which is excessive. All actors, especially Mathieu Amalric, who signs a honest, sincere and extremely touching performance with the only resource of his voice, play some brilliant performances.The Diving Bell and the butterfly is an ode to the tenacity of the human being, which is able to fight the largest of adversity and win it without more aid than the own force of will and the desire to live. |
2,789 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1288 | Elena Suárez | 13 tzameti | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Among so much quality I only found a but it is the basis of the argument has some similarity (which not total) with a film of Spanish nationality and whose name I will not mention to avoid gutting the script. See the movie and discover what. | Number thirteen does not usually pass unnoticed by many of us, well because he admires or, on the contrary, because it is feared. For the protagonist of "Tzameti" (thirteen in Georgian) this number will mean even more, will be your Passport to an uncertain destination.Betting on the black and white, Gela Babluani, gives us an opera prima where the taste for the intimate camera and the development of narrative symbols bring us reminiscent of the best classic film of suspense. Fleeing Visual sweeteners, the narration is based under a solid script and a great acting job. This is not to say that the picture is not careful, on the contrary, it shows a delicate use of lights and subjective levels.As good film of suspense, we will have with the nerves encrespados until the end, as a result of a good use of narrative time and a work of Assembly has given as a result, and attention that this is almost impossible in the times, a work of only ninety-three minutes (Hallelujah!)Mention deserves separate, the interpretation of the protagonist, Georges Babluani (brother of the director) and it has proved its worth on their own merits. Finest close-up very hard that would be not accepted by many well known actors.All these ingredients have made him be winner of four awards in various festivals (unlike what happens with other films, these are deserved). History liked both that the director has signed a contract for a remake in United States (although I am afraid that I most like the original).Among so much quality I only found a but it is the basis of the argument has some similarity (which not total) with a film of Spanish nationality and whose name I will not mention to avoid gutting the script. See the movie and discover what. |
2,790 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2909 | Tito Chinchan | El último tango en París | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Classic film that I have not heard of it will, but that leaves Marlon Brando before inflating like a toad and a well loaded mat moza. Found me a suckling pig of grade 8. | This is the typical movie that most people have not seen, but that sounds us a series of frames that have been in the history of cinema. Has who not seen Marlon Brando take butter for repasár are out there to the girl? Or the scene of the bathroom with mat included in which spinning Marlon with her on top? I could say any more, but all are sexual, is that we have the ages of Lulu to the American? I prefer ours, that at least I learned what was going.The film is about a girl who goes walking through Paris and crosses with a type that is clarea carton, and must take you a hundred years. Total, to the two frames are again to rent the same. And typically, for thee, for me, Pumbaa (which would say my baby) are already quilando as monkeys at the zoo. And she begins a relationship of submission between Marlon Brando and the young lady, takes us through a script which I did not understand anything. Luckily out numerous nudes.Direis, the Titus does not know more to do in the movies to the aunts in pelotas and is capable of tarnish to the classics considered works of art. That is true, but it is the girl hit a few yawns than rieté your Leon of the Metro. I can not criticize, that I have not enteradod and that goes. I think a sequence of situations, around a type weird, weird, weird (I say the deceased papuchi) but that I don't see the link between them. So if you have a series of sequences that have been to to the collective film retina.In short, classic film that I have not heard that it will, but get Marlon Brando before inflating like a toad and a well loaded mat moza. Found me a suckling pig degree 8.Me stayed with that face fool when all is laugh at a joke and you do not you've heard.kisses. |
2,791 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/315 | Rafa Ferrer | Poseidon | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A film well directed where the tension accompanies the tape in 99% of the time for footage | Once view the film only the can be summarized with a word stress and is that as already happened to me with "The war of the worlds" or "Mission Impossible III", the tension accompanies the tape in 99% of the time of footage.Wolfgang Petersen not only builds a film well directed, but it also goes to the grain to the 10 Min. film, getting certainly proposed since that time, we metamos in the skin of those who are there to suffer; In addition the actors have been shot all the scenes of risk and there we see them with the face of panic, both passing under a Lake of flames, as overwhelmed looking for a possible solution.Kurt Russell, Josh Lucas, Emmy Rossum beauty, and with veteran Richard Dreyfuss, are perhaps those ones I liked (almost in this order), and I would even say that Dreyfuss and Russell are worse while those who make you spend in the hour and a half (exact) that takes the tape.Certainly important the score of Klaus Badelt, a film where the that really give the callus that tilda of heroic are heroes for a moment, and as I always say, it accompanies masterfully tension that Petersen throws to the screen. |
2,792 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/283 | Silvia | Tiempo de Valientes | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It entertains, amuses and ensures a frequent smile more than constant laughter, because despite dye tragic situations which live actors, the film offers an optimistic message. | These are "times of brave" for the Argentine cinema. It is to be courageous to dare to face on the Bulletin Board with the Hollywood blockbusters and succeed in the attempt. After the success of directors like Juan José Campanella with his beloved son of the bride and Adolfo Arinstarain (common places), arrived in May to our screens Damián Szifron with a funny police comedy. What begins as a typical action film becomes a tragicomedy in which you do not know whether to laugh or mourn, pity that cause you some situations who live the protagonists couple. Thus, after a well-constructed start, this alleged police comedy us into the genre of the buddy movies, in which appear couples opposite, so common in the Yankee action cinema. In the case of this film, one is polícia and joins their police tasks as an escape route after discovering his wife deceives him. The other is a psychologist who will accompany her on its police routine in the investigation of a case by way of therapy. Psychologists, seems to have answer for all types of behaviour (or at least try to look it up) and therefore Mariano Silverstein (Diego Peretti, known for the film No sos vos am I) can find a logical explanation for the actions and feelings of inspector Alfredo Díaz (Luis Luque), investigating in his traumatic past. They are two diametrically opposed characters (the security of the psychologist from the emotional trauma of the polícia) but come to approach and understand better than anyone else.However, after the shocking and violent opening scene of the murder carried out by the cynical gangster, the script suffers ups and downs so the film loses interest until the half-hour it reaches its tipping point and the attention of the viewer recovers. The film gives a plot twist from the moment in which the apparent world of security and firm psychologist belief collapses after discovering his wife's infidelity. Psychologists you always have what we need to deal with a problem. say you it all so relaxed and convinced of what you have to do... But what happens when the problem has the patient has that take care of you? Things are not as they seem, but quite the opposite and thus appears insecure becomes safe and vice versa. The personality of the players exchanged so that the psychologist who boasted of being self-confident becomes the horned depressed. The emotional stability of the psychologist is broken and the police becomes the best psychologists. It seems that it is now the police which has all the answers. The problem most joins the two and turns them into accomplices to the desubrir a fact of corruption to try to uncover it. From this time the protagonists are involved in a full of hilarious moments research.But in addition to be comedy, the film has its own social and political criticism of corruption in Argentina, but not wallow in it. As in other films that were filmed after the dictatorship, the Federal Police and the Argentine army remain in evidence for her performances outside the law. But that is not its main argument. The important thing is that he entertains, amuses and ensures a frequent smile more than constant laughter. Because despite dye tragic situations which live actors, the film offers an optimistic message. Everyone can be a hero or because everyone can evolve, because it is time of brave. |
2,793 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1582 | Caruco | El último rey de Escocia | 3 | 5 | muchocine | An estimable, and film made only $ 6 million. | Fiction or deception as a means to get closer to a reality, as the same film. Giles Foden's novel, which was based on "The last King of Scotland", introduces us to a newly licensed Scottish physician become the man of confidence of one of the most atrocious dictators in Africa, Idi Amin, among others, is it especially that honorary title of monarch.A dramatic appeal, like others, properly rigged, or adapted, showing the film by Kevin Macdonald, but they correspond to what happened and they serve to deflect our gaze towards another sad page of history in the black continent.In the case of the protagonist, the young man unconscious and sure if same, Nicholas Garrigan (James McAvoy), is inspired by several Western doctors who had contact with the Ugandan leader. "And it is embodied in a Forest Whitaker in State of grace, which provides its gaze, restless, playful and menacing, and its large presence, Idi Amin, the man who regió, based on fear and blood, the fate of Uganda from 1971 to 1979.""Black power" incident.A dictator cultivated the arts of war by the same British, sexually insatiable and charming, able to seduce both his people and the international press, but also a megalomano forward to change the world and, above all, a be distrustful and paranoid that would lead to torture and kill roundly. Its victims include more than 300,000 Ugandans, including soldiers to its own service.Is in a way "adapted" to the story, or closest to what happened, can eventually disappear one of the Ministers of Idi Amin (in reality, one even put land of through, exiling, fearing); the Asian minority were expelled (in a dedisión applauded by most Ugandan, but which would adversely affect trade, given the mood of these); accused the representative of "Cannibal" (and this black legend has contributed the fact that kept the severed heads of some enemies in the refrigerator); his petulance and bravado to the face, or send letters, to powerful (as to the Oedipal mother Patria British) heads of State; or which appeared one of the wives of Idi Amin dismembered.And the young doctor Nicholas Garrigan manifests itself as an extension of the rest of Western, unrelated to this harsh reality, and blinded in the comfort, luxuries, gifts and entertainment.Actors and actorazos.Formally, one of the best technical aspects of the film is a lightness, mounting, and photography that reflects very well the texture of the 1970s. A work in which he sure has had to see that previous career of MacDonald as a documentary filmmaker, and came to earning him an Oscar for best documentary in 1999 for "One day in September", on the attack of Palestinians against Jewish athletes in 1972, in Munich.En images that capture both the exotic fascination as madness, moves a James McAvoy perfect as Dr. Garrigan, but eclipsed in screen everytime appears the charismatic and frightening Idi Amin/Forest Whitacker, sometimes as a child in search of affection and understanding, others as an unbalanced capable of the worst. Do even shines a Gillian Anderson in his brief escenes, and does so with a change of? look? little remember their times of "X-files".And it highlights in a film that is not either be round or extraordinary, sinó rather irregular, illustrative and willful, and with some dramatic touch to what "A man called horse" doubtful; but an estimable film, made with only $ 6 million. |
2,794 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3994 | José Córdoba | El Orfanato | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The orphanage is a film of a level notable, capable of achieving the complicity with the audience and duration never weighs on the Viewer. Its main fault, no doubt, is their total and absolute lack of originality. | The orphanage is the Spanish most anticipated premiere of the year. An ambitious horror film and that is expected to become the boat of salvation of the patriotic cinema box office this year. Following the footsteps of the others, The Haunting or Suspense! It tells the story of a family who moves to live the old orphanage where he grew up the woman (Belén Rueda). Not long until that the son of the couple disappears from the House.J. a. Bayona, director who made his debut with this film, get a film of impeccable invoice with an elegant but with some not entirely justifiable excess narration. Avoiding unpleasant scenes and sound effect shots get a classical narrative film closest in spirit to the films horror classic that the current, too dependent on the viscera. It is therefore a film with a clear reference close in time: the others of Alejandro Amenábar. the screenplay, written by Sergi Sánchez, is very appropriate in the description of characters in the sequence of events, and the successful ellipsis. On the other hand, its main fault is the excessive proliferation of clichés. The plot altogether reminds the Poltergeist(con_escena_con_médium_calcada_deel_film_dirigido,_no_oficialmente,_por_Steven_Spielberg) but the atmosphere and storytelling we refer to the others or Suspense, which in turn drink the other back nut of Henry James's story. We even find details of films as diverse as The Haunting or final destination. Of course, the end refers to the film from the others and therefore of the sixth sense, although it is less cheater in the film of Bayonne (though on the other hand, the film does have its trappings that soiled somewhat the memory of the film when he thinks it).In the interpretation, the film is at a high altitude. Highlighting a formidable Belén Rueda. She is the movie, the other characters are necessary floats on its side. It is certainly his best performance with a wide range of emotions and a weight of impressive character. For a server, it is one of the best performances of the year.In its technical sections the film is also at a high level, from photography to the design of production through the locker room. All are adecuadísimos and tight. On the music of a composer also Rookie, little to say, very close to the images but little remarkable and clear references to previous works.In summary, the orphanage is a film of a level notable, capable of achieving the complicity with the audience and duration never weighs on the Viewer. Its main fault, no doubt, is their total and absolute lack of originality that frustrating taking into the account the level of the rest of the production. |
2,795 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4243 | Iñaki Bilbao | Inugami | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Disconcerting, extravagant, surprised at not being able deslavazada and what is worse... quite tedious film Court, at least allegedly, fantastic. | "To a little town, comes the new secondary master."There he meets the particular family Bonomiya, falling for Miki a woman's youth, although quite older than his appearance. They fall in love and begin a secret affair.But it will not have easy because, apparently, the Bonomiya family is a family secret: from many generations ago, women are affected by a kind of curse: see a series of spirits of wild demons, which are deposited at the bottom of a few jars. At night they must have them to check that none of them has escaped. "If this were to happen, they would attack human beings".Disconcerting, extravagant, surprised at not being able deslavazada and what is tedious peor.bastante film of court, at least allegedly, fantastic.I have to agree that it is very interesting. Throughout the film prepares us to attend at the last minute to a fireworks of who knows what, but interesting, strong, imaginative, spectacular, violent, exciting. But nothing of the sort happens.All is shown at the end that is losing the time, resulting in a "mocho toco" film.We are it promised much and is going prepared for us to do so, but in the end everything remains in a pure and pretty boring fire of artifice.In addition, its director is in a rather embarrassing way, pedantic to the, suddenly, and without that nothing explain it, remove the color at the bottom, no one knows for what Earth. He is supposed to highlight the fire that is suddenly turned on in a scene is vital?. But it is quite sloppy Amen for free.Someone could say is that I did not understand the philosophy and Oriental keys of the film. And may well be true, it had done so maybe I would have liked more, but the truth is that I think "Inugami" as a small joke, whose vision does not lead to anything.It is also very long for what has (rather little).But not everything is negative. It has a good photograph, the landscapes are simply wonderful, and actresses do it well, getting the protagonist give his character a halo of mystery really achieved. |
2,796 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4210 | Ethan | Callejón sin salida | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It is not the most successful or the best of film noir, but yes it is containing all the elements that characterized this type of films in the 1940s. | It is not better or the best of film noir, as her possibly exceed the Maltese Falcon (The Maltese Falcon of John Huston, 1941) or El Sueño Eterno (The Big Sleep of Howard Hawks, 1946), by say two of the most famous, but yes it is containing all the elements that characterized this type of films in the 1940s. 1. A confusing and ambiguous plot. Indeed, gives equal the times you see her, at the end you do not clarify in who killed whom and why. I have always believed that the blame that the mind is us nublara had Lizabeth Scott. You can not stop looking at her when he get on screen, and it is at that moment when tend to clarify some dark point of the trama.2.-quick and witty dialogues. Very close to Screwball Comedy and evolve into a perfect complicity between Bogart and Scott against third parties - see the "Jerome" word used interchangeably the couple protagonist when lurks a danger, or the resemblance between women and bottles. All the style of the novels of Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler, in turn the most prestigious black film writers. A curiosity: the name of the character that makes Liz Scott is Chandler. It is a coincidence or is a tribute of the writers Garret and Fisher? 3. A Fatal woman. The blonde Liz Scott. At first us strikes as a replacement of the great Lauren Bacall, but then we see that behind won't you. It is the archetype of the femme fatale, platinum blonde, voice grave - highly recommended to see her Original version - appears singing a song very sexy in a slum where plays clandestinamente.4-darkness prevails. It could not be otherwise, film noir is the eldest son of Expressionism and it is characterized by the incorporation of light and shadows - more shadow than light - to reflect the State of mind of the characters. Here is appreciated even better. When the characters returning from the war to be decorated all the action it is day; the illuminated faces reflect joy for the return home. But the thing is complicated and someone is killed everything becomes dark and the action takes place at night principalmente.5-A spectacular start. A man who barely can keep standing flees from thugs and the police. Sufficient tension so the Viewer does not move seat until the end. 6 Flashback and feature voice-over. As in Doom and so many other negruras, the narrative structure rests on a long flashback narrated in first person by the protagonist. The voiceover, serious, deep and sarcastic most of the time, accompanies us along the 100 minutes that lasts the film. Again in the see it in V.O.7.-the "good" is not so in reality. Humphrey Bogart is a captain of the Army (Rip) that does not hesitate to contact friends gangsters of St. Louis, where he worked as a taxi driver, to help him steal some letter. This typical ambiguity is what makes the genre so attractive.Anyway, I do not think that a film that meets so many black ingredients like this film of Cromwell there is. Including one of the most characteristic: the presence of Humphrey Bogart. Do not fail to see them and. Jérôme! |
2,797 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/726 | Alvaro Oliva | La prueba del crimen | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Fast-paced film, full of action and dialogues that engancharán to the public in his armchair, making that they enjoy so far in which Kramer and theirs out of the top hat the latest tricks. | Attracted as many others by Quentin Tarantino in the poster advertising, I started to see "The proof of the crime" without having almost information or news about the film.The truth is that the new work of Wayne Kramer is irregular. When you go to see you have the feeling that you have cheated, because the script is very fake, liar and made for the Viewer. The truth is that it is a great mistake, because if once seen the movie you get to thinking about her and turns that has, the truth is that it breaks down enough, let alone completely, and is a shame because until then history hooks you, and above all leave you surprised with a sequence that is simply brutal, and not by what comes to see, but it is itself and for showing us what is able to make someone (in this case a pair of unbalanced mentally, that they deserve other descriptions that I am going to omit).Paul Walker leads the cast and will be who has to be behind this proof of the crime. And it is none other than a gun with which have been killed by a corrupt police officer. But let's go by parts. Joey Gazelle (Walker) is a gangster, Member of the Perello family, and while they are in a shady, they are surprised by members of the police. With this similar scene to the climax of "True romance love" starts the hectic day of Gazelle, after killing Tommy Perello to one of the policemen, he gives the gun and asks it to dispose of it. As it has to be, but there would be no movie, the character Walker ignored the order, so coincidentally the best friend of her son is the gun and flees after using it, endangering the rest of characters, that it is essential to recover the weapon for various reasons.Cameron Bright interprets the frightened girl, and with an amazing cold blood, in a remarkable way, Vera Farmiga (who can see in "Infiltrators") plays the wife of Walker, Karel Roden as the stepfather of the boy and Chazz Palminteri as one of the corrupt policemen, they are some of the protagonists of this fast-paced film.In some respects the proposal of Kramer is too far-fetched and reloaded visually, while others relax and shows us more quiet and classic situations that have to live actors, being the latter the most successful. In short "The proof of the crime" is a fast-paced film, full of action and dialogues that engancharán to the public in his armchair, making that they enjoy so far in which Kramer and theirs out of the top hat the latest tricks. |
2,798 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2432 | JLO | Mar abierto | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Of course only a greater depth in the psyche of the characters if you want but not much more. Pleasant surprise. | Open water is a quite particular film and this is for several reasons: his director Chris Kentis Debuts absolute assisted only by his wife, 120 total hours shot in video and without facts, special effects (and sharks) totally real in a film of primary terror, with an ideal length (only 79 minutes) and finally, awarded at the prestigious Sundance film festival. All this wouldn't say anything if open sea ended not be - as it is - a very good Opera prima low-budget, with an air of pseudo documentary, extremely effective and tasteful. A seemingly happy couple, after 40 minutes of diving is forgotten and sinks into the ocean, miles from the Mainland, in a shark infested water, the storyline.The increase in tension and the psychology of the own partner van in crescendo, with a precise mounting up to a beautiful, surprising and poetic end. Of course only a greater depth in the psyche of the characters if you want but not much more. Pleasant surprise. |
2,799 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3482 | Ramón Balcells | Leones por Corderos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It is indisputable that one stays indifferent after the final flat master and the whole of this irregular, but necessary film. | We are undoubtedly facing a stage of film rebellion against the USA policy; before a rise of committed and commercial cinema. And this, obviously, is a good thing. Lions for Lambs is one of the first examples of this new proposal (and protest), and is responsible for Robert Redford more active than ever. Director and protagonist, the American Democratic thoughts gives us a lesson about consciousness and, above all, of the current situation of the war of Afghanistan. A political complaint which is not just an approach to the current problems, but which also teaches us to raise us once and for all and realize what really is happening. And it is, above all, his film commercial, and therefore, that prevents some anger that I know that he has inside and is not completely portrayed. Yes, this is a film that manifests itself for an hour and half with the slogan "no to war" in each one of their planes, but this removes some episode of soldiers is not, unfortunately, credible and truly in the purest Hollywood style. And why? Therefore perhaps for fear of enfurecir to too many Americans or by the director's own thoughts, which are like the majority of Democrats in the United States, not at all ends.It is true that the complexity of the subject to be treated can be confusing for many (and I include myself in them) when we look into the film, but also it is really true that after seeing Lions for Lambs you're not indifferent. Somehow, consciousness to the viewer that not everything we report what is really true. Or perhaps Yes and precisely that is what we just we are worried about. Robert Redford has been able to create a kind of attack against the policy of his own country as well as ñoño tribute to the lambs that sent to war. By the tante, what would you rate of irregular, but I assure you that if we only focus on political messages and concienciadores of Professor Redford and the masterful duo between the journalist and Congressman, we would we be before one of the films most promising on the war in recent years. As you would expect, the trio protagonist Star (Cruise, Redford and Streep) look incredibly, with a respective interpretations truly realistic and do not seem assayed. Perhaps the episode of Congressman sinneth somewhat theatrical, but this probably allows to make Mr Tom Cruise look as it has never done. And the sad thing is that it is virtually impossible to film him falling any nomination at the next Oscars, although it does have any chance latter to qualify even for the award. It would not surprise me, but I would find it unfair if they were not also two other veterans.The sensation that causes Lions for Lambs is none other than the of having attended a debate entertaining, concienciador and with three heavyweights that support most of the footage. It is clear that the experience of Redford in the film has been shaped with subtle intelligence, and just have to see the composition of the film. Agree or not with Redford's poses, that it is not another thing than the reality, is indisputable that one stays indifferent after the final flat master and set an irregular, but necessary film. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.