label
int64
0
1
text
stringlengths
7
1.31k
1
otherwise savvy woman duped by mascara makers again
1
lockheed martin executive fondly recalls humble beginning dealing arms out of back of chrysler lebaron
1
wife unfazed by husband's sad e-mails to other women
1
rude guy unfortunately says something funny
0
they accused him of taking a backpack. the courts took the next 3 years of his life.
1
maxim skimmed
1
shy man narrowly evades free sample
0
disappointed in 'silence': proud of my domestic ignatians
1
man annoyed by travel plaza's abridged pizza hut menu
1
greenspan considering role in ocean's eleven remake
1
family dinner successfully covers topics of movies and tv
1
pigeon to invoke power of flight
1
office exiles menstruating hr manager
0
woman shuts down dude who demanded $5 back for coffee date
0
rashida jones pays homage to the '90s with 'flip and rewind' music video
1
kathie lee gifford denies getting sincerity implants
0
3 simple steps to teaching your child the art of persistence
1
jay-z: 'on second thought, i like orlando more'
1
report: supplying police with high-powered military weapons to sharply reduce costs of shooting suspects multiple times
1
Just three months. Man you have to be the best biology teacher in the world. Where did you learn to pull off a miracle like that?
1
cashier learning valuable but illegal job skills
1
report: 84% of americans currently contestants
1
I guess you had to resort to that comment because you had no response to what I said. I guess I was right emoticonXBye
0
The interesting thing about the 'quality of life ethic' is that, in a pro-choice framework, it means that we can't degrade anyone's quality of life without their permission. So far from entailing a cull of the elderly, the infirm, the handicapped, and the ugly, the quality of life ethic entails that we cannot kill them off. Each person is entitled to the quality of life that they desire where what they desire does not infringe on other's quality of life.
0
same-sex couples at center of supreme court case get ready for big day
0
'hedwig' takes home tony for best revival of a musical
0
chester bennington's wife shares video of him laughing hours before his death
0
wearable technology: the coming revolution in healthcare
0
And if you don't think it was justified? It's a public alley, she can walk down it whenever she wants without justifying herself to anyone.
0
twitter goes crazy after ugandan president museveni takes mysterious roadside call
0
avocados are about to get even more expensive
0
defending journalism in the age of trump
0
nfl commissioner's proposed solution to domestic violence problem proves they just don't get it
1
realtor obligated to tell potential buyers about murder happening in basement
1
poll: 89% of debate viewers tuning in solely to see whether roof collapses
0
spot-on video sums up the wildly different lives of cat and dog owners
0
lawyers are now the driving force behind mortgage scams
0
suspected killer of little girl worked for police
1
half-fabricated résumé still unimpressive
0
being comfortable with fear
1
biden lines up sweet summer gig installing above-ground swimming pools
1
open floor plan increases office shooter's productivity by 95%
1
everyone in bustling chinese parade attempting to elude pursuers
0
So individual cells contract to move cytoplasm around and to transport oxygen within itself?
1
supposed adult pays man to sit in room and listen to him talk about his feelings
1
adrenaline supply intended for lifting car off loved one called upon to carry 4 grocery bags at once
0
dear president trump: our grandparents were refugees. this is their story.
0
Because, not once, did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself. I have known other people who have. I don't 'CHOOSE' who I think is sexually attractive. It might have been environmental, but it certainly wasn't a 'choice'I have to assume that at least for some , if not most homosexuals, that pattern repeats itself.
0
ICBM, but I believe the termites make up the largest land-based biomass on earth.
1
Yes, it doesn't agree with your agenda so it must be trolling.
0
people are imagining what it would take for 2016 to redeem itself
1
sun myung moon funeral to be all weird, sources report
1
sparrow thinks it might have caught bird flu after puking seeds all morning
0
what happened at a texas frat when they thought no one was watching
1
white house convenes panel of scientists to make case that trump capable of crushing train with bare hands
1
overfunded public school forced to add jazz band
0
Do you think humans have the pinnacle of processing power and reason in our brain for the entire universe? (aside from god)
0
While I'm still iffy on her with the whole New Haven case, and her off-the-bench comments on race, this is one thing I commend her for and agree completely with.
1
area desk doesn't mind if people sit on it like a chair every once in a while
1
If they haven't been discovered yet, HOW THE BLOODY HELL DO YOU KNOW? Ten percent more brains and you'd be pondlife. emoticonXKill
1
cash-strapped michael jackson forced to sell off pet giraffes as meat
1
bewildered white house press watches dueling huckabee sanderses each claim she the only one telling truth
0
young frenchman identified as possible bomber in attack on bataclan concert hall
0
drake keeps crushing hard on espn reporter doris burke
1
black father gives son the talk about holding literally any object
1
Is this your simpleton way of completely missing the point? Of not being able to understand the simplest of ideas?
0
samsung will give iphone owners a new galaxy phone to try for $1
0
3 things you need to know about gut health
1
fbi panicking after learning encrypted national security communications may have been intercepted by trump administration
1
dad clarifies this not a food stop
0
alabama native channing tatum encourages followers not to vote for roy moore
0
texas attorney general ken paxton indicted
1
I guess since he said so it must be true... poor daewoo, just remember only whiners point out logic fallacies like ad hominem and argument by dismissal.
1
Thanks, for giving me the balls. I didn't know you were trying to convert me. So, because I don't believe what you want me to I'm retarded. You know I could say the same about you, it works both ways. You see I don't want to convert you, all I'd like to see is you open your mind to other possibilities. Adios, Arrevideci
0
to read or not to read, part 2
0
house republicans drop efforts to gut ethics watchdog after onslaught of criticism
1
geico saves 15 percent or more by discontinuing advertising
1
woman who drinks 6 cups of coffee per day trying to cut down on blue light at bedtime
0
That and VOR keeps flip flopping on his positions and he refuses to clarify his contridictions.
1
Oh no, it's not too complex for us to understand. So please explain to we simpletons how Intelligent Design is nothing more than animism. But first, here is the truth regarding this newest perverse propaganda you are promoting.
0
texas won't stop denying immigrants' children birth certificates -- for now
0
uber has a new service and it isn't helping in 'jimmy kimmel' spoof
1
'greatest story ever told' has gimmicky deus ex machina ending
1
fda: juicy green apple conditioner best used with juicy green apple shampoo
1
john ashcroft frolics in secret vault of winnie-the-pooh toys
1
No but it will be funny to see what sex tapes this tramp did too....
0
if the presidential election were held tomorrow, i'd shoot myself
0
Political leaders should not oppose gay marriage at all. But if a political leader is going to stomp around proclaiming that he wants to "defend traditional marriage" and promote "family values" by denying others the right to marry, the voters will not be happy if that political leader is discovered to be cheating on his wife. You seem to be suggesting that the arguments by political leaders in favor of "traditional morality" and "family values" are entirely meaningless and are just pandering to popular prejudices. That is just what the voters, I think, won't like about this.....that all the "family values" talk was nothing but political posturing to garner votes. Which it probably was.
0
the legacy i didn't know i wanted
1
scientists probably discover a new species of frog
0
man proposes to girlfriend on romantic plane ride, immediately throws up
1
library to display same tattered richard wright poster in honor of black history month
0
watch: 'the huffpost show' sizzle reel
0
russell westbrook with the classic off-the-back-of-the-defender buzzer-beater
0
Pregnancy is always harmful to the woman's body. However, if the pregnancy is desired then the changes are welcomed by the woman.To a woman who does not want to be pregnant then those changes are very unwelcome and are a bad thing. Pregnancy is always harmful, but the perception of what is happening changes depending on the woman.You do not understand that whether or not pregnancy harms the woman's body is objective, but whether or not the woman wants the pregnancy anyway depends on the woman. You are mixing the two.
1
Nah, he has been TRAINED to recognize demonic possession as part of his B.A.
1
r.l. stine admits every book he's written directly dictated to him by god
1
state bird reconsidered after latest wren attack
0
the one coworker every employee needs
0
veteran employment is our #1 priority