daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
1	Proof is a matter of math and booze. So, if you agree with Ursus maritimus, do you agree with me?
0	why mothers are so special
1	u.s. asks africa not to cash aid checks until after tax day
0	tesla's elon musk is thinking about designing an electric plane
1	the national annoyed after getting stuck performing on nosebleed lollapalooza stage
1	retiree gearing up for errands with lady friend
0	Well, the simple answer to this question is "No it is not." Telling convention to shove it is not one of the main points of being gay, not in any way shape or form. Being gay is simply about the people one is attracted to, the people one loves, and the person one wants to spend his or her life with.Now this does not mean that these people do not tell convention to go shove it, but they do so only when they believe convention is unfair, unjust, unequal, and a detriment to happiness. On the issue of gay rights, most (but maybe not all) gay people believe that the specific convention of denying some rights to gay people is a bad one, so they stand against it. They do not simply hate convention because it is convention; good convention is worth retaining.
1	50-year-old prince licks aarp representative's face
0	marvel's new she-hulk reminds us that anger can serve a purpose
0	7 genius napping inventions to get you through monday
0	the rock for president? dwayne johnson now 'seriously considering' a run
0	the u.s. throws out $3 billion in cancer drugs every year
0	So you refuse to engage in an informal debate on the topic, but you all of a sudden are itchin' for a formal debate? How about you make the challenge?
0	I believe the Bible is correct in every detail. The difference is how those who read them choose to interpret their meaning. You, for instance, look at a verse that says the earth cannot be moved and take that to mean that the Bible says that the earth does not move PERIOD. I believe that that means that God is powerful enough to keep the earth from simply "flying out" of its orbit and rocketing off into space somewhere. Yes, I proudly "cling" to the idea that a flood covered the mountains. I believe fully in the ENTIRE Bible (unlike some people) and I DO NOT "pick and choose" what I believe.
0	it's a mini 'dawson's creek' reunion!
1	person one season ahead in tv show doling out counsel like wise elder
1	munchstrosity created in frito-layboratory
0	Actually, I've heard it all before and it is wrong. The article is full of misinformation and misrepresentation. It is, as you say, slanted rather than an honest report of the data.
0	taraji p. henson reacts to first family's thoughts on 'empire'
0	why your happiest day at work was 5 years ago
1	businessman takes power bath
1	5-year-old says 'sesame street' has sucked since 2010
1	daddy hitting mommy with a chair this time
1	marriage counselor encourages woman to take on numerous sexual partners while husband at work
0	So what? It's not like institutions in this country haven't been changed before, including the supposed intitution of marriage! Guess what? It's called progress, get used to it.
0	Erm... we are? Levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are usually quoted as parts per million, currently a little over 380ppm, 150 years ago closer to 280. In 1970 about 330ppm. Carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
0	100 million more people will be in poverty by 2030 without action on climate, world bank says
1	production of 'iceman cometh' canceled due to entire cast getting called back for axe body spray commercial
0	ridiculous bat vs. pipe road rage battle gets 'star wars' treatment
0	what's next for the obamas? michelle promises they're 'not gone'
0	You know, that is one aspect of the story that no one ever seems to focus on when refuting the flood. I think it is an excellent extra point of refutation of the whole ridiculous story.
0	republican party boss dismisses trump threat to run as independent
1	trump complains entire personality rigged against him
1	Wrongo STILL! Ill explain below, because you continue to misunderstand simple English. It will be easier to confute you there.
0	That means that you view mental existence as being critical to our existence as a person. What about the body? If we were all mind and no body (this, granted, is purely a hypothetical and is often referred to in the hypothetical supernatural sense as a soul), would we still exist as people? If not, then what would we be?I agree that our bodies are an important part of how we view ourselves but are they part of the very core? I would sincerely miss my legs if they had to be amputated. However, I would still exist. Taking it to the extreme, I would sincerely miss my body if all that were left was a functioning brain, but I would still exist.
1	bored predator drone pumps a few rounds into mountain goat
1	Yeah? And who are you, Judge Judy? What would you know about the subject? It's your fellow left-wing radicals like Van Jones who think communism ought to be embraced.
0	a socal brunch spot was caught using popeyes chicken in its dishes
0	Gay Blog - QueerSighted This is long overdue. Marginalizing gay couples by failing to acknowledge our existence is ending.
0	loft's highly anticipated plus-size line is finally here
1	woman adopts second cat for first one to terrorize while she at work
0	photographer mourns her lost children in touching series
0	the beautiful parenting moment behind the #obamaandkids hashtag
1	fog machine heightens drama at children's piano recital
0	And the comments section is usually where the real comedy lies.
1	media outlets pledge evenhanded criticism of trump, clinton over next 4 years
0	free your mind your crotch will follow
1	study: majority of americans fantasize about other countries during national anthem
1	Well, if you combined his plan with all the others, then make all the cuts at once, you would be like 25% of the way there!! Come on, Steeeve...we have limited material to work with here.....
1	slug just taking it easy today
0	what does 'black-on-black crime' have to do with ferguson?
1	gay couple has banal sex
1	your "minds"? How many do you have? Oh, and "I wanted to see what inferior it was"? Nice example of your supposed superiority.
1	amtrak passengers treated to whirlwind tour of poor people's yards
1	man who keeps keys on carabiner must rappel into office building every morning
1	obama throws up right there during syria meeting
1	esl textbook concentrates on food-preparation vocabulary
1	t.j. maxx job application just asks prospective employees how much they plan to shoplift
1	nobody knows what third light switch does
0	how jimmy carter learned to make his wife rosalynn a 'full' partner
0	Yes Peeling; you say this with such assurance, yet what you can't explain with any assurance is why only one offshoot of the Primate genus evolved into what human beings are today. Why only us, when we all allegedly started in the same environment with the same ecosystems putting the same pressures on us. What I'm saying is that in every place where our alleged primate ancestors fossils have been found, so haven't the fossils of animals described as lower primates been found. So your explanation that one species evolved while another stagnated or died out rings hollow with me. Especially since you can actually prove absolutely none of this. Can't you see that Peeling? None of this is provable.
1	What's your evidence that the Gospel prophecies are "spurious claims"? Seems like you've bought into a scalding case of rational tunnel-vision (or political correctness, if you prefer).
0	you can get trump's voice on your gps now because we're all masochists
0	how to survive your child's college tours
0	former priest convicted in decades-old beauty queen slaying
0	Homosexuals are attracted to people of the same sex whether they be adults are children.............The vast majority of the priests who were charged admitted to being gay............
0	may's monumental challenge: u.k.'s new prime minister reports for duty
0	kentucky's gop bromance deepens, even without true love
1	national pork council: many americans suffer from pork deficiency
0	did ernest hemingway have an affair with his sister-in-law?
1	new voting booths lock americans inside for 45 minutes so they can consider decision before casting ballot
1	netflix defends 'queer eye' episode where the fab five forced to euthanize completely hopeless slob
1	experts report $37 amount of money you need to donate to hurricane relief in order to completely forget about it
1	Damn, takes some real gonads (wait, you're a Lib, so scratch THAT one) to claim the power to get inside the minds and hearts of the masses...a protest by Conservatives MUST be racist, but a protest by Libs is pure and righteous, correct?
1	pentagon announces plan to cover cost of hormone treatment for servicemembers doubling down on biological sex
0	radio host pranks the $%#& out of co-host
1	death of 12 schoolchildren makes perfect sense
0	This is a much poorer analogy than mine could possibly be. If drunk driving were legal and didn't affect anyone outside the driver's body it could be analogous. If drunk driving did not affect anyone outside the driver's body, I would agree that they probably should have the freedom to do so if they so choose (even if I personally disagreed). However, the reason drunk driving is illegal is that it endangers everyone on the road around the driver.
1	frustrated rick santorum still waiting for go-ahead from god to suspend presidential campaign
0	what german cities have learned from the front lines of the refugee response
1	company flat-out asks female candidate how much mileage they can get out of her before she has baby
0	bullying prevention: the power of empathy
1	man resolves to read the wikipedia tabs he already has open before starting new ones
1	How bout $500,000 for a slaughterhouse that kills thousands of innocent animals just sitting in a line? What's your point? That we shouldn't eat meat?
0	the book we're talking about
1	So much for the idea of the more helpless you make yourself the safer you are eh!
0	the end of 'shrink it and pink it': a history of advertisers missing the mark with women
0	No they don't. We didn't have a tyrannical society back in the 1830s when without a doubt personal autonomy didn't exist for some. The thing is, you don't have absolute personal autonomy now either. And it still doesn't answer my question about where the right came from, you just said there had to be one.
0	four incredible new advances in health technology
0	mueller ain't going away
1	"while at home" huh. When did your right to self-defense end at your property line? That is quite a stretch from an old bubble gum chewer even like yourself sliiiick. Thank G-d I live in Texas!!! Those facists states are already failed states so it is semantics anyway when the slaves get restless. criminals are a tyrants wanna be best friend. Everyone should know by now that the cops have no duty to defend anyone no matter the excuses...you are on your own. Everyday I read about the predator leos preying on the electorate so which is worse?
1	complete psychopath meets proper screen time, sleep, exercise guidelines
0	This is why people shouldn't have opinions, rather facts. Opinions should remain neutral untill sufficient objective evidence can be gathered. When people run off having "opinions," they cause trouble.The fact that someone doesn't do or believe what he is selling doesn't affect the validity of the argument. There are teachers who don't believe in evolution, yet they teach it because it's standardized.You have people who promote an idea because it's popular, because of convention, or because someone tells them to.Someone can be saying something, believing something else, yet be totally wrong. THeir belief isn't the fact.
1	netanyahu doubles down against obama with powerpoint on perils of affordable care act
1	cash-strapped nra forced to shoot dozens of redundant employees
1	report: much of u.s. still underpaved
0	fast-track derails democracy
0	an exile artist from iraq paints herself into ancient illustrated manuscripts
1	arab-american third-grader returns from recess crying, saying he didn't kill anyone
0	The desperate flailings of a city with absolutely no common sense. They're so impotent in their abilities to get tough on criminals, they feel it necessary to go after the most unrelated sources to try and make themselves look big and busy.Why not just build a big wall to cut itself off from the rest of the world, and set up high security check points so cars coming and going can be checked to ensure no contraband is being smuggled in.

1

Proof is a matter of math and booze. So, if you agree with Ursus maritimus, do you agree with me?

0

why mothers are so special

1

u.s. asks africa not to cash aid checks until after tax day

0

tesla's elon musk is thinking about designing an electric plane

1

the national annoyed after getting stuck performing on nosebleed lollapalooza stage

1

retiree gearing up for errands with lady friend

0

Well, the simple answer to this question is "No it is not." Telling convention to shove it is not one of the main points of being gay, not in any way shape or form. Being gay is simply about the people one is attracted to, the people one loves, and the person one wants to spend his or her life with.Now this does not mean that these people do not tell convention to go shove it, but they do so only when they believe convention is unfair, unjust, unequal, and a detriment to happiness. On the issue of gay rights, most (but maybe not all) gay people believe that the specific convention of denying some rights to gay people is a bad one, so they stand against it. They do not simply hate convention because it is convention; good convention is worth retaining.

1

50-year-old prince licks aarp representative's face

0

marvel's new she-hulk reminds us that anger can serve a purpose

0

7 genius napping inventions to get you through monday

0

the rock for president? dwayne johnson now 'seriously considering' a run

0

the u.s. throws out $3 billion in cancer drugs every year

0

So you refuse to engage in an informal debate on the topic, but you all of a sudden are itchin' for a formal debate? How about you make the challenge?

0

I believe the Bible is correct in every detail. The difference is how those who read them choose to interpret their meaning. You, for instance, look at a verse that says the earth cannot be moved and take that to mean that the Bible says that the earth does not move PERIOD. I believe that that means that God is powerful enough to keep the earth from simply "flying out" of its orbit and rocketing off into space somewhere. Yes, I proudly "cling" to the idea that a flood covered the mountains. I believe fully in the ENTIRE Bible (unlike some people) and I DO NOT "pick and choose" what I believe.

0

it's a mini 'dawson's creek' reunion!

1

person one season ahead in tv show doling out counsel like wise elder

1

munchstrosity created in frito-layboratory

0

Actually, I've heard it all before and it is wrong. The article is full of misinformation and misrepresentation. It is, as you say, slanted rather than an honest report of the data.

0

taraji p. henson reacts to first family's thoughts on 'empire'

0

why your happiest day at work was 5 years ago

1

businessman takes power bath

1

5-year-old says 'sesame street' has sucked since 2010

1

daddy hitting mommy with a chair this time

1

marriage counselor encourages woman to take on numerous sexual partners while husband at work

0

So what? It's not like institutions in this country haven't been changed before, including the supposed intitution of marriage! Guess what? It's called progress, get used to it.

0

Erm... we are? Levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are usually quoted as parts per million, currently a little over 380ppm, 150 years ago closer to 280. In 1970 about 330ppm. Carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

0

100 million more people will be in poverty by 2030 without action on climate, world bank says

1

production of 'iceman cometh' canceled due to entire cast getting called back for axe body spray commercial

0

ridiculous bat vs. pipe road rage battle gets 'star wars' treatment

0

what's next for the obamas? michelle promises they're 'not gone'

0

You know, that is one aspect of the story that no one ever seems to focus on when refuting the flood. I think it is an excellent extra point of refutation of the whole ridiculous story.

0

republican party boss dismisses trump threat to run as independent

1

trump complains entire personality rigged against him

1

Wrongo STILL! Ill explain below, because you continue to misunderstand simple English. It will be easier to confute you there.

0

That means that you view mental existence as being critical to our existence as a person. What about the body? If we were all mind and no body (this, granted, is purely a hypothetical and is often referred to in the hypothetical supernatural sense as a soul), would we still exist as people? If not, then what would we be?I agree that our bodies are an important part of how we view ourselves but are they part of the very core? I would sincerely miss my legs if they had to be amputated. However, I would still exist. Taking it to the extreme, I would sincerely miss my body if all that were left was a functioning brain, but I would still exist.

1

bored predator drone pumps a few rounds into mountain goat

1

Yeah? And who are you, Judge Judy? What would you know about the subject? It's your fellow left-wing radicals like Van Jones who think communism ought to be embraced.

0

a socal brunch spot was caught using popeyes chicken in its dishes

0

Gay Blog - QueerSighted This is long overdue. Marginalizing gay couples by failing to acknowledge our existence is ending.

0

loft's highly anticipated plus-size line is finally here

1

woman adopts second cat for first one to terrorize while she at work

0

photographer mourns her lost children in touching series

0

the beautiful parenting moment behind the #obamaandkids hashtag

1

fog machine heightens drama at children's piano recital

0

And the comments section is usually where the real comedy lies.

1

media outlets pledge evenhanded criticism of trump, clinton over next 4 years

0

free your mind your crotch will follow

1

study: majority of americans fantasize about other countries during national anthem

1

Well, if you combined his plan with all the others, then make all the cuts at once, you would be like 25% of the way there!! Come on, Steeeve...we have limited material to work with here.....

1

slug just taking it easy today

0

what does 'black-on-black crime' have to do with ferguson?

1

gay couple has banal sex

1

your "minds"? How many do you have? Oh, and "I wanted to see what inferior it was"? Nice example of your supposed superiority.

1

amtrak passengers treated to whirlwind tour of poor people's yards

1

man who keeps keys on carabiner must rappel into office building every morning

1

obama throws up right there during syria meeting

1

esl textbook concentrates on food-preparation vocabulary

1

t.j. maxx job application just asks prospective employees how much they plan to shoplift

1

nobody knows what third light switch does

0

how jimmy carter learned to make his wife rosalynn a 'full' partner

0

Yes Peeling; you say this with such assurance, yet what you can't explain with any assurance is why only one offshoot of the Primate genus evolved into what human beings are today. Why only us, when we all allegedly started in the same environment with the same ecosystems putting the same pressures on us. What I'm saying is that in every place where our alleged primate ancestors fossils have been found, so haven't the fossils of animals described as lower primates been found. So your explanation that one species evolved while another stagnated or died out rings hollow with me. Especially since you can actually prove absolutely none of this. Can't you see that Peeling? None of this is provable.

1

What's your evidence that the Gospel prophecies are "spurious claims"? Seems like you've bought into a scalding case of rational tunnel-vision (or political correctness, if you prefer).

0

you can get trump's voice on your gps now because we're all masochists

0

how to survive your child's college tours

0

former priest convicted in decades-old beauty queen slaying

0

Homosexuals are attracted to people of the same sex whether they be adults are children.............The vast majority of the priests who were charged admitted to being gay............

0

may's monumental challenge: u.k.'s new prime minister reports for duty

0

kentucky's gop bromance deepens, even without true love

1

national pork council: many americans suffer from pork deficiency

0

did ernest hemingway have an affair with his sister-in-law?

1

new voting booths lock americans inside for 45 minutes so they can consider decision before casting ballot

1

netflix defends 'queer eye' episode where the fab five forced to euthanize completely hopeless slob

1

experts report $37 amount of money you need to donate to hurricane relief in order to completely forget about it

1

Damn, takes some real gonads (wait, you're a Lib, so scratch THAT one) to claim the power to get inside the minds and hearts of the masses...a protest by Conservatives MUST be racist, but a protest by Libs is pure and righteous, correct?

1

pentagon announces plan to cover cost of hormone treatment for servicemembers doubling down on biological sex

0

radio host pranks the $%#& out of co-host

1

death of 12 schoolchildren makes perfect sense

0

This is a much poorer analogy than mine could possibly be. If drunk driving were legal and didn't affect anyone outside the driver's body it could be analogous. If drunk driving did not affect anyone outside the driver's body, I would agree that they probably should have the freedom to do so if they so choose (even if I personally disagreed). However, the reason drunk driving is illegal is that it endangers everyone on the road around the driver.

1

frustrated rick santorum still waiting for go-ahead from god to suspend presidential campaign

0

what german cities have learned from the front lines of the refugee response

1

company flat-out asks female candidate how much mileage they can get out of her before she has baby

0

bullying prevention: the power of empathy

1

man resolves to read the wikipedia tabs he already has open before starting new ones

1

How bout $500,000 for a slaughterhouse that kills thousands of innocent animals just sitting in a line? What's your point? That we shouldn't eat meat?

0

the book we're talking about

1

So much for the idea of the more helpless you make yourself the safer you are eh!

0

the end of 'shrink it and pink it': a history of advertisers missing the mark with women

0

No they don't. We didn't have a tyrannical society back in the 1830s when without a doubt personal autonomy didn't exist for some. The thing is, you don't have absolute personal autonomy now either. And it still doesn't answer my question about where the right came from, you just said there had to be one.

0

four incredible new advances in health technology

0

mueller ain't going away

1

"while at home" huh. When did your right to self-defense end at your property line? That is quite a stretch from an old bubble gum chewer even like yourself sliiiick. Thank G-d I live in Texas!!! Those facists states are already failed states so it is semantics anyway when the slaves get restless. criminals are a tyrants wanna be best friend. Everyone should know by now that the cops have no duty to defend anyone no matter the excuses...you are on your own. Everyday I read about the predator leos preying on the electorate so which is worse?

1

complete psychopath meets proper screen time, sleep, exercise guidelines

0

This is why people shouldn't have opinions, rather facts. Opinions should remain neutral untill sufficient objective evidence can be gathered. When people run off having "opinions," they cause trouble.The fact that someone doesn't do or believe what he is selling doesn't affect the validity of the argument. There are teachers who don't believe in evolution, yet they teach it because it's standardized.You have people who promote an idea because it's popular, because of convention, or because someone tells them to.Someone can be saying something, believing something else, yet be totally wrong. THeir belief isn't the fact.

1

netanyahu doubles down against obama with powerpoint on perils of affordable care act

1

cash-strapped nra forced to shoot dozens of redundant employees

1

report: much of u.s. still underpaved

0

fast-track derails democracy

0

an exile artist from iraq paints herself into ancient illustrated manuscripts

1

arab-american third-grader returns from recess crying, saying he didn't kill anyone

0

The desperate flailings of a city with absolutely no common sense. They're so impotent in their abilities to get tough on criminals, they feel it necessary to go after the most unrelated sources to try and make themselves look big and busy.Why not just build a big wall to cut itself off from the rest of the world, and set up high security check points so cars coming and going can be checked to ensure no contraband is being smuggled in.