daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
0	Object to the woman being required to remain pregnant when she does not want to be.
0	amy schumer denies she has a 'blind spot' about race
0	terrified dolphin throws himself at man's feet to escape hunters
1	robert mueller driving suv 100 mph down runway as air force one narrowly lifts off
0	But the embryo is a mere clump of flesh inside of a woman's body. Science proves it. It has no sign of intelligence, it is merely cells at this stage. Therefore, it cannot be referred to as another person, or neighbor, and is no where near comparable to a human. Choices that harm another should be illegal, but choices regarding your own personal liberty and freedom should be made by the individual. Not the government.
0	You don't have to be the best organism to survive. You just have to be good ENOUGH.
1	scientists warn americans to stay away from that bird
0	eden baylee is a stranger at sunset
0	global perceptions of china as a superpower
0	why statehouse interns are especially vulnerable to sexual harassment
1	third-person limited omniscient narrator blown away by surprise ending
1	murphy brown: still on the air?
0	kristen wiig is a comedy goddess in this deleted 'snl' sketch
1	gentle ben biographer's shocking new book reveals famous bear's 28-pine-marten-a-day habit
0	spouse criticism may worsen chronic low back pain
0	the toy aisle is almost too much for this boy to handle
1	'i don't fit into any of corporate america's little boxes,' says single, 18-to-36-year-old hispanic female with brand loyalty to tom's, chobani
0	welcome to herointown, new jersey's 4th-largest city
0	the smart alice vote
0	That is about the same for me (although I never went to church), and I find it more of an intellectual stimulation, and I can learn a lot too
1	disney trailer teases exit of major character in upcoming film 'death at pooh corner'
0	76ers top lakers for first win of season, snap 28-game skid
0	lights go on: part li -- a single word
1	Sure, cause everyone ALWAYS agrees with everything their church minister says. emoticonXRolleyes
0	new york cracks down on payday lenders
1	australian parliament gathers to discuss dwindling hemsworth reserves
1	amount of halloween candy collected down 15 percent
0	spoof gum commercial chews away at islamophobia in the best possible way
0	here is jake gyllenhaal singing his heart out ahead of his broadway musical debut
0	do you have what it takes to be a prison censor?
0	It's remarkable then, how much progress we've made. You may or may not approve of the theory, but it works very well at learning more about biology.
0	bernie sanders praises nba for moving all-star game out of north carolina
0	how to make the most gorgeous summer dinner ever
1	cat dead set on finding way into mirror
0	It's even worse than that. He isn't asking for info on how it works; if he was I would supply it gladly. He claims to already know that it's wrong, which implies that he thinks he knows what it's about. But despite already knowing what carbon dating is, he still needs someone here to provide an explanation before he can present his "proof" that it's incorrect. As Akbar says, "It's a trap!"
1	area dad concerned he's running out of family photos to digitize
0	kim kardashian is back on the town, and her look is... interesting
1	$30 million donation from chan-zuckerberg charity to help kids learn to read returned
1	middle-aged woman so tired of going back and forth between divorced parents' nursing homes
1	Losing again I see. Don't change the subject. How are supporting 'gay sex debauchery' and lying in any way synonymous? You have made the accusation. Back it up. If different words are too much for your miniscule brain to cope with, I suggest you try yelling your hogwash on a street corner, where less people will be able to see how much of a fool you are.
1	bouncer instructed not to let people like himself in
0	schools enact positive change with drama therapy
1	Oh - so you don't want to force me through pregnancy at any cost to me? You will let me make what decision is best for me? You will actually realize that I am in the best position to know?
0	No. You've not understood what I said. I don't know how to make it perfectly clear to you...the reason the skin color vs. homosexuality analogy is not valid is that one is in 100% of the cases studied a result of uncontrollable genetic inheritance and the other is generally not.
0	migrant and refugee children find a home in greece's intercultural schools
1	heartbroken russian ambassador thought special meetings with jeff sessions were very memorable
0	deadly california wildfire near big sur set to explode in size
0	fighting pests with sounds waves, not pesticides
0	And the risk to minority's civil rights is, of course, the reason for the bill. They are, after all, limiting what can be started via initiative, not eliminating the initiative process altogether. The fraud was merely an example of why the change is needed. As has been argued here before, if civil rights need protecting, it's from the majority. Allowing civil rights to be modified via the initiative process simply makes it too easy for the majority to impose it's will on the minority. That's not what a Democracy is about, at least not our Democracy.
1	mommy having sleepover
1	homosexuality only thing parents can accept about son
0	here's who will moderate the presidential and vice presidential debates
0	fox news guest: san bernardino shooting raises questions on 'state of feminism in muslim america'
1	capsizing boat passes u.s. in global quality of life rankings
0	invest in human capital
0	matt damon reveals the vain reason behind donald trump's movie cameos
1	santorum nostalgic for time when beliefs were outlandish enough to make headlines
1	authorities confirm north korea now has missile capable of hitting sam waterston's house
0	5 nutritionist-approved back-to-school tips
1	'the onion' hires several pastry chefs away from entenmann's to form new bakery
0	cities across the west coast are uniting against monsanto
1	report: majority of mothers would drop kids off at warehouse called 'fun zone' for hour of free time, no questions asked
1	Not only is Phyllis right in calling you what you are but you clearly ignore reality. You were already called on using incorrect facts once...you might as well say "denying abortion will cause 10000000 bagillion deaths a day"
0	And you know what? No amount of epigenetic change is going to turn a fruitfly embryo into a human. One of the reasons they are different, and subject to different epigenetic regimes, is because despite genetic homologies (which evolutionary theory predicts), their genomes are significantly different. They have some different genes, in different quantities, and in different arrangements, and that is critical. Epigenetics alone can't take one species and turn it into another, so far as anyone knows. It takes genomic restructuring, and that happens only through genetic mutation.
1	group of christie campaign deserters found in forest
0	I think it depends on what they were charged with. Rapist-no child molester-no Basically most or all crimes of violence-no Possession of pot-o.k. your basic chicken ####stuff.emoticon_xkill
1	'new york times' publisher reveals asking trump to decrease anti-media rhetoric except against those fuckers at 'the washington post'
0	the black friday and cyber monday travel deals to book asap
0	how much will black lives matter in trump's america?
1	blood runs down house of representatives walls as chamber itself selects new speaker
0	officers of the peace
1	senate intelligence committee confirms from testimony that donald trump jr. has no knowledge
0	why do weddings cost so much?
1	I think that might mean that you should shut your trap about other people and not pass judgement on them (i.e. Carl Sagan right here in this topic, etc.). What do you think?
1	larva acting like it knows everything about chewing leaves
0	why these people of faith are marching for women this weekend
1	Pro-lifers are like slave traders? What a pro-lifers trading? Anyone who denies a human being a fundamental human right is a slave trader...like a right to life...???
1	grandma guts it out through lunch on sunny patio
1	man in international airport only speaks business
1	And the UN seems to feel it's necessary to spell out that you have the right to marry and have a family.
0	money men say, voters move over, it's not your election!
0	the new colossus of today is white nationalism
1	9/11 memorial curators decide not to display swastika formed by twisted girders found at ground zero
0	how pluto got its giant frozen heart
1	sleeping middle-aged businessman in airport suddenly so childlike, so vulnerable
0	three chinese tourists dead, six people missing in borneo shipwreck
0	florida woman crashes wedding, and it doesn't end well
0	donald trump to meet with editors of new yorker, vanity fair and vogue
0	How do you know there isn't a tiger in the bathroom? You feel very strongly and have over-whelming evidence that there is no tiger in your bathroom? (You live in an urban area, there are no zoos, you don't hear scratching or biting or the maiming of your poodle, and the water is going) But you cannot prove a negative. Which is also why you won't be able to prove that creationism is wrong, and why we can't prove evolution is wrong. The focus must be on proving one right. How you might do that depends on your method of reasoning and thought.
1	It seems my attempt at spreading intellectual capacity failed. The answer to my question and yours to me is no.
0	I think you are misinterpreting what I am saying. For example, we would still exist without a lung or a heart if that lung or heart were replaced by artificial lungs or hearts. Indeed, if you push things to the extreme case (and, granted, this is going into the science fiction realm but it proves a point), if we could artificially keep our functioning brains alive and functioning on their own (without a body), then "we" would still exist as long as the brain's function involved all the mental processes related to our mental existence. That existence would just be pretty dismal without any sensory inputs or freedom of motion (unless they were supplied artificially). That is what I am heading at. What are we at our very core? I don't see how you logically derive this conclusion from what I said. Can you elaborate?
0	federal judge refuses to block mississippi anti-lgbt law
1	new don blankenship campaign ad touts jobs created in wake of upper big branch mining disaster
1	war talks begin at camp goliath
1	How do they use "the empirical evidence prove it", when they do no research, and no evidence actually supports their "theory"?
0	on mars, who's in charge?
1	bored god tries to fit all of jupiter in mouth
1	texan feels emotionally empty after chili cook-off
0	Oh, don't be so hasty Bear in mind that at the scale upon which bacteria operate, molecules are significant physical structures. The bacterial flagellum, for instance, is an outboard motor constructed directly out of proteins, which are in turn directly, physically translated via RNA from DNA sequences. The physical shape of the folded molecular structure of those proteins is what makes the motor work. So there's nothing abstract about the relationship between DNA and the organism's physical form or abilities.
1	Better still , you pop down to your local army barracks and explain it to thememoticonXClown

0

Object to the woman being required to remain pregnant when she does not want to be.

0

amy schumer denies she has a 'blind spot' about race

0

terrified dolphin throws himself at man's feet to escape hunters

1

robert mueller driving suv 100 mph down runway as air force one narrowly lifts off

0

But the embryo is a mere clump of flesh inside of a woman's body. Science proves it. It has no sign of intelligence, it is merely cells at this stage. Therefore, it cannot be referred to as another person, or neighbor, and is no where near comparable to a human. Choices that harm another should be illegal, but choices regarding your own personal liberty and freedom should be made by the individual. Not the government.

0

You don't have to be the best organism to survive. You just have to be good ENOUGH.

1

scientists warn americans to stay away from that bird

0

eden baylee is a stranger at sunset

0

global perceptions of china as a superpower

0

why statehouse interns are especially vulnerable to sexual harassment

1

third-person limited omniscient narrator blown away by surprise ending

1

murphy brown: still on the air?

0

kristen wiig is a comedy goddess in this deleted 'snl' sketch

1

gentle ben biographer's shocking new book reveals famous bear's 28-pine-marten-a-day habit

0

spouse criticism may worsen chronic low back pain

0

the toy aisle is almost too much for this boy to handle

1

'i don't fit into any of corporate america's little boxes,' says single, 18-to-36-year-old hispanic female with brand loyalty to tom's, chobani

0

welcome to herointown, new jersey's 4th-largest city

0

the smart alice vote

0

That is about the same for me (although I never went to church), and I find it more of an intellectual stimulation, and I can learn a lot too

1

disney trailer teases exit of major character in upcoming film 'death at pooh corner'

0

76ers top lakers for first win of season, snap 28-game skid

0

lights go on: part li -- a single word

1

Sure, cause everyone ALWAYS agrees with everything their church minister says. emoticonXRolleyes

0

new york cracks down on payday lenders

1

australian parliament gathers to discuss dwindling hemsworth reserves

1

amount of halloween candy collected down 15 percent

0

spoof gum commercial chews away at islamophobia in the best possible way

0

here is jake gyllenhaal singing his heart out ahead of his broadway musical debut

0

do you have what it takes to be a prison censor?

0

It's remarkable then, how much progress we've made. You may or may not approve of the theory, but it works very well at learning more about biology.

0

bernie sanders praises nba for moving all-star game out of north carolina

0

how to make the most gorgeous summer dinner ever

1

cat dead set on finding way into mirror

0

It's even worse than that. He isn't asking for info on how it works; if he was I would supply it gladly. He claims to already know that it's wrong, which implies that he thinks he knows what it's about. But despite already knowing what carbon dating is, he still needs someone here to provide an explanation before he can present his "proof" that it's incorrect. As Akbar says, "It's a trap!"

1

area dad concerned he's running out of family photos to digitize

0

kim kardashian is back on the town, and her look is... interesting

1

$30 million donation from chan-zuckerberg charity to help kids learn to read returned

1

middle-aged woman so tired of going back and forth between divorced parents' nursing homes

1

Losing again I see. Don't change the subject. How are supporting 'gay sex debauchery' and lying in any way synonymous? You have made the accusation. Back it up. If different words are too much for your miniscule brain to cope with, I suggest you try yelling your hogwash on a street corner, where less people will be able to see how much of a fool you are.

1

bouncer instructed not to let people like himself in

0

schools enact positive change with drama therapy

1

Oh - so you don't want to force me through pregnancy at any cost to me? You will let me make what decision is best for me? You will actually realize that I am in the best position to know?

0

No. You've not understood what I said. I don't know how to make it perfectly clear to you...the reason the skin color vs. homosexuality analogy is not valid is that one is in 100% of the cases studied a result of uncontrollable genetic inheritance and the other is generally not.

0

migrant and refugee children find a home in greece's intercultural schools

1

heartbroken russian ambassador thought special meetings with jeff sessions were very memorable

0

deadly california wildfire near big sur set to explode in size

0

fighting pests with sounds waves, not pesticides

0

And the risk to minority's civil rights is, of course, the reason for the bill. They are, after all, limiting what can be started via initiative, not eliminating the initiative process altogether. The fraud was merely an example of why the change is needed. As has been argued here before, if civil rights need protecting, it's from the majority. Allowing civil rights to be modified via the initiative process simply makes it too easy for the majority to impose it's will on the minority. That's not what a Democracy is about, at least not our Democracy.

1

mommy having sleepover

1

homosexuality only thing parents can accept about son

0

here's who will moderate the presidential and vice presidential debates

0

fox news guest: san bernardino shooting raises questions on 'state of feminism in muslim america'

1

capsizing boat passes u.s. in global quality of life rankings

0

invest in human capital

0

matt damon reveals the vain reason behind donald trump's movie cameos

1

santorum nostalgic for time when beliefs were outlandish enough to make headlines

1

authorities confirm north korea now has missile capable of hitting sam waterston's house

0

5 nutritionist-approved back-to-school tips

1

'the onion' hires several pastry chefs away from entenmann's to form new bakery

0

cities across the west coast are uniting against monsanto

1

report: majority of mothers would drop kids off at warehouse called 'fun zone' for hour of free time, no questions asked

1

Not only is Phyllis right in calling you what you are but you clearly ignore reality. You were already called on using incorrect facts once...you might as well say "denying abortion will cause 10000000 bagillion deaths a day"

0

And you know what? No amount of epigenetic change is going to turn a fruitfly embryo into a human. One of the reasons they are different, and subject to different epigenetic regimes, is because despite genetic homologies (which evolutionary theory predicts), their genomes are significantly different. They have some different genes, in different quantities, and in different arrangements, and that is critical. Epigenetics alone can't take one species and turn it into another, so far as anyone knows. It takes genomic restructuring, and that happens only through genetic mutation.

1

group of christie campaign deserters found in forest

0

I think it depends on what they were charged with. Rapist-no child molester-no Basically most or all crimes of violence-no Possession of pot-o.k. your basic chicken ####stuff.emoticon_xkill

1

'new york times' publisher reveals asking trump to decrease anti-media rhetoric except against those fuckers at 'the washington post'

0

the black friday and cyber monday travel deals to book asap

0

how much will black lives matter in trump's america?

1

blood runs down house of representatives walls as chamber itself selects new speaker

0

officers of the peace

1

senate intelligence committee confirms from testimony that donald trump jr. has no knowledge

0

why do weddings cost so much?

1

I think that might mean that you should shut your trap about other people and not pass judgement on them (i.e. Carl Sagan right here in this topic, etc.). What do you think?

1

larva acting like it knows everything about chewing leaves

0

why these people of faith are marching for women this weekend

1

Pro-lifers are like slave traders? What a pro-lifers trading? Anyone who denies a human being a fundamental human right is a slave trader...like a right to life...???

1

grandma guts it out through lunch on sunny patio

1

man in international airport only speaks business

1

And the UN seems to feel it's necessary to spell out that you have the right to marry and have a family.

0

money men say, voters move over, it's not your election!

0

the new colossus of today is white nationalism

1

9/11 memorial curators decide not to display swastika formed by twisted girders found at ground zero

0

how pluto got its giant frozen heart

1

sleeping middle-aged businessman in airport suddenly so childlike, so vulnerable

0

three chinese tourists dead, six people missing in borneo shipwreck

0

florida woman crashes wedding, and it doesn't end well

0

donald trump to meet with editors of new yorker, vanity fair and vogue

0

How do you know there isn't a tiger in the bathroom? You feel very strongly and have over-whelming evidence that there is no tiger in your bathroom? (You live in an urban area, there are no zoos, you don't hear scratching or biting or the maiming of your poodle, and the water is going) But you cannot prove a negative. Which is also why you won't be able to prove that creationism is wrong, and why we can't prove evolution is wrong. The focus must be on proving one right. How you might do that depends on your method of reasoning and thought.

1

It seems my attempt at spreading intellectual capacity failed. The answer to my question and yours to me is no.

0

I think you are misinterpreting what I am saying. For example, we would still exist without a lung or a heart if that lung or heart were replaced by artificial lungs or hearts. Indeed, if you push things to the extreme case (and, granted, this is going into the science fiction realm but it proves a point), if we could artificially keep our functioning brains alive and functioning on their own (without a body), then "we" would still exist as long as the brain's function involved all the mental processes related to our mental existence. That existence would just be pretty dismal without any sensory inputs or freedom of motion (unless they were supplied artificially). That is what I am heading at. What are we at our very core? I don't see how you logically derive this conclusion from what I said. Can you elaborate?

0

federal judge refuses to block mississippi anti-lgbt law

1

new don blankenship campaign ad touts jobs created in wake of upper big branch mining disaster

1

war talks begin at camp goliath

1

How do they use "the empirical evidence prove it", when they do no research, and no evidence actually supports their "theory"?

0

on mars, who's in charge?

1

bored god tries to fit all of jupiter in mouth

1

texan feels emotionally empty after chili cook-off

0

Oh, don't be so hasty Bear in mind that at the scale upon which bacteria operate, molecules are significant physical structures. The bacterial flagellum, for instance, is an outboard motor constructed directly out of proteins, which are in turn directly, physically translated via RNA from DNA sequences. The physical shape of the folded molecular structure of those proteins is what makes the motor work. So there's nothing abstract about the relationship between DNA and the organism's physical form or abilities.

1

Better still , you pop down to your local army barracks and explain it to thememoticonXClown