daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
1	But did you consider it relative when you posted this on another thread?:
1	'loud, desperate need for approval' leads tony nominations
0	sanders hits bill clinton on welfare reform, trade
0	secretive whcd pre-party draws hollywood celebrities
1	boss thinks female employee might be ready to handle job she's been doing for past 2 years
1	Thank You. You know how much I love to impress people.
0	'f**k muzlim' and 'terroist' spray-painted on muslim man's car
0	right whales could face extinction after deadly year, researchers say
0	huffpost rise morning newsbrief, october 20
0	family loses third son to the heroin epidemic
1	george w. bush forgets to mention 9/11 in memoir
1	stepson absolutely nailing jeopardy category about third reich
1	area man's back aching after bad night's sleep, 58 continuous years of horrible posture
0	truthful tuesday: the forgetful edition
1	So, how many unborn babies did your God drown in Genesis? Talk about hypocrisy.
1	radio shack salesman 'a little out of it today'
1	Tell ya what; I got this Rolex I'm wiling to sell ya for $50.00. Give me the money and wait here. I'll be right back!
1	alabama cracks down on abortions by outlawing all medical procedures
0	what the amazon vs. hachette debate ignores: independent authors
0	jimmy kimmel issues psa for angry trump fans planning to burn their maga hats
0	donald trump's obsession with the polls has made it rough for some pollsters
1	lifeguard hoping to make up for last summer
0	There is a pretty huge difference.Civil unions aren't nationally recognized, for one thing, since not every state has them. If you travel to a state that does not offer civil unions, then your union is not valid there.I think there's a problem with dissolving those unions as well.The big difference, though, are the rights that these unions provide. There are over 1,000 legal protections and rights that marriage provides that civil unions don't. I'll try and find a list of differences.
1	chimp study on human-evasion response to feces-hurling nearly complete
1	war criminal a grandpa
1	banksy hospitalized with third-degree burns after attempting to cash self-destructing check
0	10 people you'll see out at hometown bars on thanksgiving eve
0	why toothpicks are the best cake testers
0	tennessee senate passes a bill to erect a memorial to 'victims of abortion'
1	entomologists retract new spider species discovery after determining it actually just clump of dust, hair
0	here are all the 2017 grammy winners
0	lessons from losing a friend
1	millions head to internet to figure out their own opinions about debate
0	No it didn't, there's no suggestions for how to enforce background checks to stomp out straw purchases. Stop offering non-solutions.
0	these cities want the country to focus more on access to preschool
0	the one scene that sets 'apes' apart from other blockbusters
1	townsperson in online rpg universe figures shield, gold pieces should be safe in barrel
1	bush lets war widow punch his arm once
1	every baby boomer in country urged to resign after photos emerge of them in blackface
0	20 must have fashion items for every college girls wardrobe
1	Is that right next to ANWR? Are the Canadians downplaying ANWR while they side drill to extract our precious fluids? emoticonXClown
0	Hey, as Collin said, P.Z. registered, and got it. I would say that booting him out is the height of hypocrisy. It confirms to be that it is based on a lie, and the producer knows it. The movie was making a claim that the 'opposition' was silencing I.D., and the presentation of alternate ideas. Yet, what do they do? They kicked someone out they INTERVIEWED for the movie (based on false pretenses to be sure, but they did pay him for appearing in the movie).That sounds that THEY are the ones trying to suppress opposing ideas, not science. Yes, they had the legal right. But, boy did it put egg on their face, considering everything. It shows them to be hypocrites and liars.
1	public outraged as price of fast-depleting, non-renewable resource skyrockets
0	queer film explores long-term relationships in the age of the single
0	in this cleveland family, anti-trump doesn't always mean pro-clinton
0	a guy crashes through a table in snow to celebrate ncaa tournament upset
0	it takes about 20 celebrities to explain why 62 million girls are being dumbed down
0	hundreds of goats invade berkeley
1	child unaware just how many of his toys intended to steer him away from homosexuality
0	new documentary makes the case for supervised heroin injection sites in new york
1	poet takes extra 5 minutes to vague up poem
1	homosexual dolphin has highly developed sense of gay-nar
0	If you think that it's OK when the Mother's life is in danger. Why wouldn't it be OK when her life isn't in danger?
1	Individual personal accountability without political leveraging onto others in the same party who did not commit the offense? What a bizarre idea... emoticonXHoho
0	stepping back into now
1	baby knocked out with cough syrup praised for being such a good little traveler
1	That board is full of XXXX. I didn't read what the preacher had to do with it but I guess the preacher (if he was involved with the board) is full of XXXX also. Perhaps they all need a good laxative to get rid of that XXXX. If the letter refers to a letter of Paul's, then they misinterpreted it.
1	mayor daley's son appointed head of illinois nepotist party
0	investigation in notre dame student-tutor sex scandal reveals startling accusations
1	superstitious ocean blaming all its weird behavior on the moon
0	gop congressman: 'nobody dies because they don't have access to health care'
0	ted cruz: federal reserve is being run by philosopher kings
1	I guess cheer leaders are the new tough guys and gals!
0	activists rally behind pope's message on climate, the poor
1	tucker carlson angrily explains difference between good baby and bad baby
1	sheryl crow's freshness date expires
0	the paradox of addiction
1	Look what is talking about insane, immune to reason, a prisnor of his own giant ignorance, slavery fetishist and one of the comic relief 3 stooges. You might have a dialogue but then insult isn't part of one. No one gives a rat's patoot about your opinion. If it were your country maybe they would but I doubt it. Mean while eat your heart out as you rail in fear about us buying and keeping arms.
1	complete idiot forgot to shave area between mouth and nose
1	shocking 'game of thrones' finale concludes with arrest of 5 million viewers for piracy
0	vladimir putin's childhood besties defend their 'petty' pal in 'snl' spoof
1	So all of this ballyhoo and really you've changed nothing? emoticonXConfused The entire system of inheritance and wills would still be in place.
0	video shows officers pepper-spraying restrained man who says he can't breathe
0	the g-20 declaration makes a major mention of the world's top infectious killer
0	Oh, I don't know that she is any nuttier than the next person. However I think her opinion is wrong. I also think her argument is not correct. A person can not impose themselves on your property without your consent - and you CAN remove them, and even kill them if they are a threat to you.
1	conversation at other end of table sounds way more interesting
0	'take your kid to work day' results in npr newscast shutting down for full minute
1	Would it be the lawless Cardinal Law officiating at one of the funerary masses for JPII and otherwise serving in a prominent role in all the pomp and circumstance surrounding the pope's death?
1	body breaking down in totally different order than man expected
1	I think if you pay any attention, you'll find only hetero characters in Dr. Seuss. I'm sure if there were any suggestion of gay Whos for Horton to hear, the right-wing, anti-gay, pseudo-christians (specific enough for you?) would be trying to ban Seuss, too.
0	confessions of a secret dog stalker
1	local band finds great photo for flier
0	jane seymour's secrets to feeling young after 50
0	joan rivers remembered
1	lingerie-wearing boehner: 'we still have a very pretty speaker of the house'
0	drake hasn't even opened his restaurant and already threw a party there
0	'60 minutes' reporter reveals trump's chilling reason for slamming the press
0	the one moment you need to see from last night's 'peter pan live!'
1	paranormal expert bores son with ghost story
1	mother still yammering away under her tombstone
1	unwatched netflix dvd stares at area man with single unblinking eye
1	red lobster introduces new mechanical jumbo shrimp ride
1	internet not quite done milking cory monteith's death for all it worth
0	grateful dead lyricist, internet pioneer john perry barlow dead at 70
0	Well the government track record in health care isn't too good. Medicare is broke and busted by their own accounts. So if they can't run that correctly by what stretch of the imagination do you come up with them being able to manage the whole healthcare industry? Medicaid is broke. The VA healthcare system is a shambles. You would think they would get them up and running smoothly before trying to sell us the snake oil of their healthcare. Then there is the big problem of rationing. No matter what lies are told, health care is rationed in socialized medicine.
1	facebook status update field dreading what area man about to type into it
0	d'angelo russell's kobe impression was, uh, awkwardly accurate
0	the epa is 'brainwashing our kids' says climate change denier sen. jim inhofe
1	white house denied third mortgage
0	Because what inspired my argument/debate challange was the Questions for both sides thread, it was full of vague/popular laymans usages of the term, and you cant blame only me for it, since I didn't start the thread, and since I was only about 1/10 of all the broad usages of the term going on in that thread, the rest were coming from evolutionists. Please read its opening post (by an evolutionist) youre not going to find much about biology there.

1

But did you consider it relative when you posted this on another thread?:

1

'loud, desperate need for approval' leads tony nominations

0

sanders hits bill clinton on welfare reform, trade

0

secretive whcd pre-party draws hollywood celebrities

1

boss thinks female employee might be ready to handle job she's been doing for past 2 years

1

Thank You. You know how much I love to impress people.

0

'f**k muzlim' and 'terroist' spray-painted on muslim man's car

0

right whales could face extinction after deadly year, researchers say

0

huffpost rise morning newsbrief, october 20

0

family loses third son to the heroin epidemic

1

george w. bush forgets to mention 9/11 in memoir

1

stepson absolutely nailing jeopardy category about third reich

1

area man's back aching after bad night's sleep, 58 continuous years of horrible posture

0

truthful tuesday: the forgetful edition

1

So, how many unborn babies did your God drown in Genesis? Talk about hypocrisy.

1

radio shack salesman 'a little out of it today'

1

Tell ya what; I got this Rolex I'm wiling to sell ya for $50.00. Give me the money and wait here. I'll be right back!

1

alabama cracks down on abortions by outlawing all medical procedures

0

what the amazon vs. hachette debate ignores: independent authors

0

jimmy kimmel issues psa for angry trump fans planning to burn their maga hats

0

donald trump's obsession with the polls has made it rough for some pollsters

1

lifeguard hoping to make up for last summer

0

There is a pretty huge difference.Civil unions aren't nationally recognized, for one thing, since not every state has them. If you travel to a state that does not offer civil unions, then your union is not valid there.I think there's a problem with dissolving those unions as well.The big difference, though, are the rights that these unions provide. There are over 1,000 legal protections and rights that marriage provides that civil unions don't. I'll try and find a list of differences.

1

chimp study on human-evasion response to feces-hurling nearly complete

1

war criminal a grandpa

1

banksy hospitalized with third-degree burns after attempting to cash self-destructing check

0

10 people you'll see out at hometown bars on thanksgiving eve

0

why toothpicks are the best cake testers

0

tennessee senate passes a bill to erect a memorial to 'victims of abortion'

1

entomologists retract new spider species discovery after determining it actually just clump of dust, hair

0

here are all the 2017 grammy winners

0

lessons from losing a friend

1

millions head to internet to figure out their own opinions about debate

0

No it didn't, there's no suggestions for how to enforce background checks to stomp out straw purchases. Stop offering non-solutions.

0

these cities want the country to focus more on access to preschool

0

the one scene that sets 'apes' apart from other blockbusters

1

townsperson in online rpg universe figures shield, gold pieces should be safe in barrel

1

bush lets war widow punch his arm once

1

every baby boomer in country urged to resign after photos emerge of them in blackface

0

20 must have fashion items for every college girls wardrobe

1

Is that right next to ANWR? Are the Canadians downplaying ANWR while they side drill to extract our precious fluids? emoticonXClown

0

Hey, as Collin said, P.Z. registered, and got it. I would say that booting him out is the height of hypocrisy. It confirms to be that it is based on a lie, and the producer knows it. The movie was making a claim that the 'opposition' was silencing I.D., and the presentation of alternate ideas. Yet, what do they do? They kicked someone out they INTERVIEWED for the movie (based on false pretenses to be sure, but they did pay him for appearing in the movie).That sounds that THEY are the ones trying to suppress opposing ideas, not science. Yes, they had the legal right. But, boy did it put egg on their face, considering everything. It shows them to be hypocrites and liars.

1

public outraged as price of fast-depleting, non-renewable resource skyrockets

0

queer film explores long-term relationships in the age of the single

0

in this cleveland family, anti-trump doesn't always mean pro-clinton

0

a guy crashes through a table in snow to celebrate ncaa tournament upset

0

it takes about 20 celebrities to explain why 62 million girls are being dumbed down

0

hundreds of goats invade berkeley

1

child unaware just how many of his toys intended to steer him away from homosexuality

0

new documentary makes the case for supervised heroin injection sites in new york

1

poet takes extra 5 minutes to vague up poem

1

homosexual dolphin has highly developed sense of gay-nar

0

If you think that it's OK when the Mother's life is in danger. Why wouldn't it be OK when her life isn't in danger?

1

Individual personal accountability without political leveraging onto others in the same party who did not commit the offense? What a bizarre idea... emoticonXHoho

0

stepping back into now

1

baby knocked out with cough syrup praised for being such a good little traveler

1

That board is full of XXXX. I didn't read what the preacher had to do with it but I guess the preacher (if he was involved with the board) is full of XXXX also. Perhaps they all need a good laxative to get rid of that XXXX. If the letter refers to a letter of Paul's, then they misinterpreted it.

1

mayor daley's son appointed head of illinois nepotist party

0

investigation in notre dame student-tutor sex scandal reveals startling accusations

1

superstitious ocean blaming all its weird behavior on the moon

0

gop congressman: 'nobody dies because they don't have access to health care'

0

ted cruz: federal reserve is being run by philosopher kings

1

I guess cheer leaders are the new tough guys and gals!

0

activists rally behind pope's message on climate, the poor

1

tucker carlson angrily explains difference between good baby and bad baby

1

sheryl crow's freshness date expires

0

the paradox of addiction

1

Look what is talking about insane, immune to reason, a prisnor of his own giant ignorance, slavery fetishist and one of the comic relief 3 stooges. You might have a dialogue but then insult isn't part of one. No one gives a rat's patoot about your opinion. If it were your country maybe they would but I doubt it. Mean while eat your heart out as you rail in fear about us buying and keeping arms.

1

complete idiot forgot to shave area between mouth and nose

1

shocking 'game of thrones' finale concludes with arrest of 5 million viewers for piracy

0

vladimir putin's childhood besties defend their 'petty' pal in 'snl' spoof

1

So all of this ballyhoo and really you've changed nothing? emoticonXConfused The entire system of inheritance and wills would still be in place.

0

video shows officers pepper-spraying restrained man who says he can't breathe

0

the g-20 declaration makes a major mention of the world's top infectious killer

0

Oh, I don't know that she is any nuttier than the next person. However I think her opinion is wrong. I also think her argument is not correct. A person can not impose themselves on your property without your consent - and you CAN remove them, and even kill them if they are a threat to you.

1

conversation at other end of table sounds way more interesting

0

'take your kid to work day' results in npr newscast shutting down for full minute

1

Would it be the lawless Cardinal Law officiating at one of the funerary masses for JPII and otherwise serving in a prominent role in all the pomp and circumstance surrounding the pope's death?

1

body breaking down in totally different order than man expected

1

I think if you pay any attention, you'll find only hetero characters in Dr. Seuss. I'm sure if there were any suggestion of gay Whos for Horton to hear, the right-wing, anti-gay, pseudo-christians (specific enough for you?) would be trying to ban Seuss, too.

0

confessions of a secret dog stalker

1

local band finds great photo for flier

0

jane seymour's secrets to feeling young after 50

0

joan rivers remembered

1

lingerie-wearing boehner: 'we still have a very pretty speaker of the house'

0

drake hasn't even opened his restaurant and already threw a party there

0

'60 minutes' reporter reveals trump's chilling reason for slamming the press

0

the one moment you need to see from last night's 'peter pan live!'

1

paranormal expert bores son with ghost story

1

mother still yammering away under her tombstone

1

unwatched netflix dvd stares at area man with single unblinking eye

1

red lobster introduces new mechanical jumbo shrimp ride

1

internet not quite done milking cory monteith's death for all it worth

0

grateful dead lyricist, internet pioneer john perry barlow dead at 70

0

Well the government track record in health care isn't too good. Medicare is broke and busted by their own accounts. So if they can't run that correctly by what stretch of the imagination do you come up with them being able to manage the whole healthcare industry? Medicaid is broke. The VA healthcare system is a shambles. You would think they would get them up and running smoothly before trying to sell us the snake oil of their healthcare. Then there is the big problem of rationing. No matter what lies are told, health care is rationed in socialized medicine.

1

facebook status update field dreading what area man about to type into it

0

d'angelo russell's kobe impression was, uh, awkwardly accurate

0

the epa is 'brainwashing our kids' says climate change denier sen. jim inhofe

1

white house denied third mortgage

0

Because what inspired my argument/debate challange was the Questions for both sides thread, it was full of vague/popular laymans usages of the term, and you cant blame only me for it, since I didn't start the thread, and since I was only about 1/10 of all the broad usages of the term going on in that thread, the rest were coming from evolutionists. Please read its opening post (by an evolutionist) youre not going to find much about biology there.