rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23,368,961
|
== Bmicomp's RfA == Well, my RfA has not quite completed yet, but either way, I'd like to thank you for your vote and your support, regardless of the outcome. ,
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,374,732
|
` to: mickwest I found your last post rather inaccurate. Here is what I exactly said: ``I am not interested in viewing your ``best Wikipedia articles`` where unscholarly irrational exhuberance runs amok with non-attribution gay abandon. If I want to read such material, I can go to the super market and read the National Enquirer.`` In short, your best Wikipedia articles are not necessarily the true best Wikipedia articles. And again, sticking to Wikipedia rules will produce an exemplary Wikipedia BSF article. So far nobody has stated why this is not so and I believe they never will. I think Wikipedia knows how good Wikipedia articles are written! kdbuffalo`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,377,670
|
` == Hello Again... == I see that you took some time off while I was gone. Why did you go through all the trouble of being the ``plaintiff`` in your R.F.Ar. if you weren't going to follow through? If I weren't such a gentleman I would move for a dismissal for failure of prosecution. Of course in real life if you do that the plaintiff still has one more chance to re-file anyway, in most states. But enough of that. Europe was cool. See you around. Hope you dont get too stressed out dealing with those arrogant folk that jet off to Berchtesgaden and leave you in snowy Connecticut all in a tizzy `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,384,356
|
::: Hah! Good one! Haven't we played enough of the same old MGS? MGS 1, MGS 2, MGS 3...you mean to tell me something I've played 3 times already is going to be better than any game on the Xbox 360? By the way...chances are good that MGS will migrate to the 360 or Revolution, or possibly both in the future.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,384,511
|
== Stop trolling the Nintendo Revolution talk page == The console hasn't been released yet, hell, even the controller hasn't been finalized. You haven't played it, all you've seen is pictures. You cannot judge the controller until you've tried it, and because you can't possibly have, everything you've been posting to the talk page is trolling and that is unacceptable on Wikipedia.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,387,010
|
I would like to add to the discussion here. In fact there aren't many badly constructed languages at all (I know none, and I've programmed in many). What one can say is the lower the languages (closer to the machine language) the more stress is put on the knowledge of the developer to create a good working program (You need to know your language's do's and don'ts). Take for instance the difference between C++ and Java. Although they both are Modern Languages, C++ still can cause buffer over and underruns while this is pretty difficult to achieve in Java. Although memory leaks still can appear in Java this is probably one of the major flaws in C++ Programs. It's not the language that's bad, but the code that's written in them!
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
23,388,534
|
: Saying the Golan Heights are a 'part of Israel by law' is politics. The Ha'ihud Ha'Leumi's position on this is irrelevant. What matters is what official policy the United Nations, The United States and the rest of the world community have - and it is that Golan Heights are occupied territory. Don't photoshop any more CIA maps.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,395,709
|
== Kind Sir! == Would you mind including in your userpage how you enjoy spending a great amount of time picking at unimportant details of controverseal subjects instead of contributing to wikipedia?
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,409,977
|
::::::I do not think that I have trouble as you suggest. Most sources which support the view that Elvis had affairs with men are written by English and American writers. Their texts usually do not include grammar or syntax errors.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,420,956
|
` :Oh, I know why. You see, I was pointing out to Linuxbeak that someone else hates him too. I just searched for ``Linuxbeak`` on Google, I didn't create that stuff. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,424,287
|
== You should change... == your nickname into: Fascist Vacuumbrain! CRAZY GUY!
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,425,879
|
` :::hey, ddv, you're just stirring around the elements emphatically, making an awfully lengthy show but proving nothing. you can't call an ancient egyptian a black man and keep a straight face. can you? have you studied it at all? (and i mean outside of the propaganda site bibliographies). egyptology is a respectable field but people like you make a circus out of it. your arguments are shifty, imbalanced and halting. trying to prove your point, for example, by indicating an article as if it should be taken for sooth, in an encyclopedia you openly proclaim ``racist,`` not to mention published before world war I, is ridiculous. in the real definition of that word: worthy of ridicule. the same with referencing historical commentaries long removed from actual events, to prove egyptians were black men, when we have real egyptian records and artifacts to examine. herodotus a reliable source on eighteenth dynasty egypt? hello. :::i can't say i understand the impulse. egypt was a repetative place; always the same sculptures, always the same rituals, always the same supplications, always the same monuments to egos in stone. its colonnades inspired later architects in greece and rome, but for all its monumentality egyptian architecture wasn't worth much more than that. is it because you suppose egypt was the first real civilization? look up ancient sumer. :::all the while . . . the heart of the world is africa. we evolved there as a species. erectus to sapiens. after that, we diverged. biodiversity. environmental adaptation. and now we're a little differently hued standing next to each other and of slightly different skeleton. why should that not make us brothers? ( )`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,436,423
|
` What? I'm blocked again! I've only edited my userpage since Willmcw blocked me! Now I can't even do that! `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,447,505
|
Biased Is it just me or does this article seem pretty biased. Seems like it puts down Danzig quite a bit and leaves him almost no credit even though he wrote every single song of theirs.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,460,321
|
` == You are in violation of Wikipedia:Civility == Since it has been months and you have refused to address it, I am soon going to take action through the appropriate channels in Wikipedia. In Wikipedia:Civility it clearly states that you can't lie about users, such as outlined here (in regard to my arbitration committee ruling). In the future, I suggest that if you make a ruling against someone, you don't simply make up dozens of claims against them out of thin air. The problem is that when you make them up, instead of reading through what the person said to try to ``spin`` what they've said, chances are you won't be able to find any supporting links as evidence. This was evidence by one of your more bold claims of ``Cite your sources``, where you provided zero (0) links as evidence. The fact that you couldn't come up with anything upon request on the mailing list doesn't help your case either (you actually stopped replying completely once I very thoroughly outlined the many places I did cite sources). This really is your last chance to dig and find something. In case you're wondering, I was just kind of bored, which is why I didn't get around to this until now. In retrospect, I find the myriad of accusations (lies) you put with zero (0) supporting links to be appalling. If I remember correctly, you easily added over 75% of them personally. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,461,421
|
==Do not Revert Your Discussion Page== Please do not revert your User Talk page ==Homosexuality - The Genetic Disease== I am a proud homophobic - Gaylords not welcome ! ===Background=== Genomics has proven scientifically that the disease of homosexuality can be traced to certain abnormal genes. This abnormality or genetic disease is at the heart of the casualties sexual problems and gender identity disorder. ===Treatment=== Gene splicing is a process of removing abnormal genes, which cause disease and replacing them with normal healthy genes. This type of gene therapy is currently being used for many diseases, including diabetes. In future, it is expected that gene therapy will be possible in the womb, thus the parents will be able to decide on their child's sexual preference. Inevitably, most parents will ask that the malfunctioning gay gene causing homosexuality will be corrected and homosexuality will be eliminated through this process. In other words, the disease of homosexuality with it's transgender issues will at some point in time become rare if not extinct, similiar to the eradication of small pox, through vaccination. ===Studies=== There are many scientific studies that have proven the genetic disease theory as fact: Genetic Disease
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,462,129
|
:Been there, done that. ;-) |
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,467,989
|
Hello Ben, :If you are going to insert a NPOV header on the page, you are supposed to justify all and every point you have in mind, not completely smash up a page, and then rewrite it with no discussion or debate as a Watchtower PR exercise. Many others here have covered these issues over and over and the page has been approved by two administrators in regard to the eschatology section. My edits were reverting, not altering the main text sections. I only edited the last 1995 bit, and you've said nothing about that, except made unfounded claims. All major changes are supposed to be discussed first, and you have not done that, you have just ripped out the factual material and done a whitewash edit in apologist speak to look like it was all a minor dream or something. :A couple of points I will pick up on were where you claimed in regard to 1799, 1914, 1920, and 1925 etc., that they were “suggestive and purely speculative”, but Ben, not one of those dates falls into your apologist descriptions, you are clearly not being reasonable, rational, or honest :You then say “Progressive adjustments of understanding in the face of unfolding events, resulted in a period of changing explanations centered around the years 1914, 1918, 1920, and 1925.” That is also incorrect because those dates were only changed after their humiliating failure, not before. It hardly takes a brain surgeon to change a prediction, where the world is still looking on, long after the end was supposed have arrived! You also are trying to use very deceitful terminologies to try and pacify the facts to more and more insignificance, when they were anything but that at their times of publishing. An example of your gross dishonesty is here where you say “Other dates variously considered being time of God's judgement”. Since when were they “variously considered”? They forcefully stated, “we affirm that, Scripturally, scientifically, and historically, present-truth chronology is correct beyond a doubt. Its reliability has been abundantly confirmed. . .” and “This chronology is not of man, but of God. Being of divine origin and divinely corroborated, present-truth chronology stands in a class by itself, absolutely and unqualifiedly correct.” What you inserted was gross fabrication and deceit Ben. Why? What is your agenda? If you are embarrassed, get over it. You should not destroy, whole pages due to your religious ties to the JWs. :Ben, you said “They do not profess to be inspired”, but they use ever synonym in the book that directly implies that exact same thing, see quotes here 1 and here 2, why are you hiding this balance? :There are a lot more points that you are misleading and censoring for your own agenda, and that is not the purpose of Wikepedia. I get the impression you are possibly a naïve JW who does not know about the real history of your religion (please don’t take offence at this, it is a common thing), and so you edit in good faith that your indoctrinated info from the watchtower org is correct. Please do some detailed research before you vandalise many editors' hard work. Wikepedia is here for accurate information, be it good or bad, but not public relations platform for religious groups and their biases. You have also repeatedly changed long accepted text with no discussion. Can I suggest you look up the 14 pages of talk and read them all carefully before you abuse the hard work of others with your grossly biased unauthorized edits. Best wishes. 17th of September, 2005 PS. For more info, read some oh the Watchtower org’s published material here. 1914, 1975, and the whole lot (four pages) :
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,469,584
|
==dunc== I have stated why I believe you are being inaccurate and engaging in inappropriate behavior towards me. It is very easy for you to comply with my request. I am not asking you to do anything. I am merely asking you to stop doing things which are inappropriate. Please stop your current behavior. Thank you, ken
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,470,071
|
ken to: dunc: I appended/revised my last post to you. ken
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,474,379
|
` == ``RE: Suicide`` == ``On a lighter note, Raul is a fat prick.```
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
23,474,542
|
` ::::``Actually, Jarlaxle is right; that shit was done by me. Alex, you're a cunt. 'Nuff said.```
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
23,479,528
|
==Hey, stop it!== Please stop changing nu metal to alternative metal it is a fact that they are nu metal, Dalkaen (or should I say Mr. Fucking Wanker?) and you have the wrong information! Get a life.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
23,485,081
|
to: guettarda I revised my last post to you. I wrote: Duncharris also admits I have been polite to him. You can go to his userpage and see for yourself.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,485,311
|
` to: dpr Duncharris has sent me more than one very insulting message to my userpage. He uses such words as ``fundie``, nonsense, etc. Duncharris also admits I have been polite to him. You can go to his userpage and see for yourself. MickWest and duncharris want to play ``Atheist bullyboys`` by sending me repeated messages to my userpage designed to irritate me. If you want to make a message to that kdbuffalo comment page saying I cite an abundance of medical historians, medical/science journals which is the truth it would be appreciated. Also, I believe this policy is being ignored: ``None of this, however, is to say that minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can possibly give them on pages specifically devoted to those views. There is no size limit to Wikipedia. But even on such pages, though a view is spelled out possibly in great detail, we still make sure that the view is not represented as the truth.`` kdbuffalo`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,486,186
|
to: Dpr I will take the time to post the duncharris insulting messages. However, if I do will you post to the kdbuffalo talk page that I cited a plentitude of reputable sources to support my view? Is it fair to say this? Will you say this? kdbuffalo
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,486,488
|
` == re: admin duncharris's abusive messages == TO: Dpr Here is an excerpt of one of Duncharris's abusive messages to my userpage. You can check my userpage log history or duncharris's userpage where I reiterated it back to him. It wasn't the first. Here it is: ``Look mate, I can respect you for not losing your rag. Now, I'm fairly clueless about this whole matter, but having dealt with a lot of creationist nonsense, I think the nonsense threshold of fundies is low.`` Are you willing to publically denounce this? Are you willing to say I used a plentitude of responsible sources to support my view? kdbuffalo`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,487,542
|
TO: Dpr I created a new article to stop the nonsense. Here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admin_duncharris%27s_abusive_messages._Wiki%27s_atheist_bullyboy kdbuffalo
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,487,916
|
So is shag just the same as rolling tobacco, or are they different things?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,491,137
|
` ::you can't invoke the sweeping generalities of ptolemaic ``historians`` to stand as indisputable support for a black ancient egypt. that's just dignified ignorance, and it tarnishes nearly all of your entries. ( )`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,495,058
|
` ::Kate, I am sorry to answer this here, but Ryan has already stated she would not respond to me. Please note the following: ##All of my comments above are true, reasonable, and fair. ##My comment to Ryan was a response to her accusation that my 5RR report on her was ``retribution.`` It was not; it was in good faith, she fueled an edit war that got the page blocked; I stand behind my report. The page's edit history speaks for itself. ##I never mentioned your name; it was Dmcdevit you chastised her. ##All comments I have left on Ryan's page, she has blanked out once with the words ``complete bullshit`` in the edit summary, once calling them ``offensive`` but not explaining how they were offensive. ##Ryan has never responded to me on my talk page, however; although she is welcome to. ##And yes, she does like to call everything she doesn't like an ``attack.`` It is rhetoric, nothing more. ##When Ryan loses an argument, she says ``I will not respond to you,`` making it impossible to have a reasonable discussion. ##Ryan is welcome to address me directly, on my talk page, any time she wishes. If she does, I will respond. ##If Ryan still disputes that she made 5RR in less than 19 hours, if would be happy to discuss it with her. If she stops bringing it up, I will. If she continues to mischaracterize it as ``retribution,`` I will respond. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
23,495,563
|
` ::haughty and cryptic. ddv, when i offer anything ``concrete`` it does not come in magazine-like abundance because it is not strip mined backfill from propaganda sites. such as your ``egypt-women`` 1 and 2 pictures, which don't show egyptian women at all but royal concubines gifted to egypt's pharaohs by neighboring sovereigns. this is basic egyptology twisted to fleece the undiligent. disingenuous to the core. ( )`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,498,269
|
` and I will Dear Jim, I give up. I have posted the following at page talk:cherokee. Please unlock and DELETE all content authored by me and I will flag the pages I created for deletion. I will notify Dr. Delso tommorrow and I will be recommending some other on-line project for us to pursue. I am less than pleased with the handling of this site and you have not kept your word to me. As such, I am recommending to my people to NOT support this site. Jeff V. Merkey I have been out most of the day and have reviewed what's gone on here on this site since I have been out with my wife and son. I have asked Marty (mmartin) to cease in posting me to this section or this article, and to be honest, while it strokes my ego a great deal, I cannot support a sewer site like this one based upon what I have seen go on here. I am a member of the Nation but I am not going to post private information to this site, or allow this ``lynch mob`` mentality to go on here, nor do I have to image my tribal card and post it to the internet to satisfy some anonymous poster from Australia. I have had several conversations over the past week with about the activities that go on with this site, and at this point, I am going to recommend to Dr. Delso at the Cherokee Nation education department at the Nation that I cease my support of this site. I had intended and begun a full tutorial on our language and had already begun it with the translations and cultural information section. In short, WORD IS NO GOOD and he is a LIAR. He gave me his assurances that these types of attacks would not go on here, but what has happened in the SCOX message board has basically moved to this site and have continued their stalking and harrassment and it has continued unabated. At this point, this in not constructive for my people or my culture to support an organization that simply allows ``thundering herd`` libel and personal attacks on individuals, reverts and defacement of information, and the so-called ``admins`` of this site are just as immature, if not more so, than the persons engaging in libel. As such, I am reverting and removing and marking for deletion all content I have contributed to date. I have been very unimpressed with the people on this site running it. It appears to be a group of immature high schoolers and college graduates who cannot tell the difference between adults and children. Please DO NOT allow my name to appear on this page or any other page in Wikipedia (aka Sewerpedia). Sincerely. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,504,869
|
(UTC) Whos Shakespeare do? 20:55, Sep 19, 2005
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,514,626
|
`:I agree that the results are fairly clear - there is probably more chance of one of the victors being invovled in a an accident before taking their seat, than someone else being elected - so it isn't a big deal, even if I am a bi uncomfortable with it. Thanks for suggesting I search when making the dab pages - I was previously only using ``what links here`` to find other entries. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,517,768
|
It's evident that you don't know what Roma are, as you've mixed a lot of peoples that have no relationship at all with Roma. Please get documented before saying nonsensical assertions.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,525,565
|
. Please get documented before saying nonsensical assertions.'''
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,525,772
|
by the vandal Pavel Vozenilek
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,526,460
|
` == I believe in their Indoaryan Origin (or Iranians of India). == Certainly from what ive seen, read and experienced about Roma people i think that they certainly show close resemalance to similar Nomads of Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and just North India (not south India); yet i don´t agree that the historians or anthropologist should keep on mentioning India as the origin of their people, since India is to big a concept and ethnicity to do so. We must first encounter that really India as a concept is borrowing or a creation of the invading Aryans (indoeuropeans of iranian orign) that actually settled up north in between Pakistan and Afghanistan as the origin of this culture (later tu establish themselves in Rajasthan, Jammu-Kashmir, Guajarat and north-west regions basically to extend their culture) It is precisly the regions of the ``Sindhu River`` between mountains of Afghanistan and the Pakistnian valleys of ``Kashmir`` and ``Punjab`` the real home of Hinduism and ``indoaryans`` (indoiranians). So what i mean, is that if we talk about ``gypsy`` people we must talk not precisaly about India but first about Pakistani or Afghan-Iranian aryan culture and tribes that entered those regions invading the aboriginal populations and established a new culture. That is why many people feel (i am one) that ``roma`` people have more connections to mesapotamia or semitic peoples since many forget to mention that indoarians (invading iranians) where culturally and ethnically closer to Semites, Huns and Greeks that came from Iran (a fusion between them peoples id say). Precisly the Romani languague closely resembles Punjabi and Hindi yet more closer even to Pothohari and mountain languages of Pakistan and Afghanistan (were there are many nomadic tribes). That is the reason why many gypsy dont look Indian (south indian atleast) but more Persian, Iranian, Kurdish, Dardic, Drokpas or Pashtu people and dont have dravidian traits of austrolid or asian origin; but certinaly resemble a mix of southern european mediteraneas (iranian-greek) mixed with semitic traits. M Many gyspys have long beards as how old nomadic VEDIC ARYANS (sun worshipers, budda etc) had; as well as have green eyes and a reddish tone to their skin like people for centuries where nomads in the mountain areas of Pakistan, North India and Afghanistan. What i mean to say is that they dress,look,act,and their music is more similar to people like the Kurds,Dards,Guajars,Pashtus,Pothoharis,Kashmiris and Punjabis than to dravidian-mongolian or austrolid indians. We must also remember that the apperance of those nomadic indoeuropean (iranian) and others partly semitic-iranian-hun-greekish people; is how old ARYANS used to look like; add to that a reddish tone of skin since they lived in the mountains. The dress of gypsy people closely resembles more Iranin or Afghan nomadi peoples. The tipical jewlery and earings of women nomads in those areas is one sign. Also the long hair used buy man plus earings close resembles those aryan conceptos of sunworshipping worriors that where great horse riders and metalsmiths who brought Cattle_Cows to the desert and tropical areas of Pakistan and India; that was how historically dravidians described those whiter skinned, mostage-bearded men that invaded their more asian-austroloid land. I believe Gypsys or Roma are descendants of the ``Indoaryan`` of orgin worriors of ``iranian origin`` that settled in the mountanous regions of Pakistan (Pothohari-Kashmir) and those who went into the deserts of Rajasthan (Rajputs-Jatts). I believe these people gatthered together to defend themselves from invading Muslims as did classical persiands; yet where defeated and pride got to them so they fled their land since they wanted to continue their concept of nomadic sunworshippers. Gypsyes do not resemble dravidian culturs but more Irani (Persian)Afghani(Pashtu)-Punjabi-Kashmiri-Rajasthani-Harayana-Brhamman cultures of indoeuropean or irani-scythian-greekish influence and language... Gypsy Music is not only resembled in the famous ZARDS, the primitive Tangos or Boleros of Romania, Hungary and Russia; and Flamenco or Cante Jondo but u can trace their indoaryan music in Country,Rock and Roll-Hippie Music, Fox Trot-Jazz; and ofcourse latin american rythms like: Rumba, Salsa, Bolero, Tango, Peruvian Valse, Tondero, Zamacueca, Charchalera, Milonga etc... It errant living and the suffering of a worrior people that pridley did not accept the imposition of mongolian or muslim invaders; so they fled with their women and similar tribes of indoaryan origin into the western regions; saddly to know they to large and were not given any help they dedicated themselves to music, entertainment (circus-acrobats-scene players) and poets; yet they mained t
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,526,517
|
by Nazi vandal Pavel Vozenilek.'
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
23,529,508
|
` ==cooperation is asked for but is true cooperation asked for?== I don't have any problem with the NPOV rule. I just see censorship over and over. Wikipedia is clear: ``None of this, however, is to say that minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can possibly give them on pages specifically devoted to those views. There is no size limit to Wikipedia. But even on such pages, though a view is spelled out possibly in great detail, we still make sure that the view is not represented as the truth.`` Now I have wanted to have cooperation and have good faith efforts on both sides. I have listened to the other side and taken feedback. I made some changes although admittedly not a lot. However, Cooperation may never happen. Why? Here is why: 1. Does MickWest change the theological conservative Christianity internal link so it goes to the Christian right (Falwell, etc). Would a person who wants to act in good faith do that? 2. Would people who act in good faith send harrassing messages (``fundie`` etc). I think the people calling for cooperation yet saying absolutely nothing publically about the bad behavior of certain parties are not seeking true cooperation. What they are asking for is the minority view be trampled despite the Wikipedia policy. kdbuffalo`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,531,296
|
==to: jtkiefer== I don't think I am being treated fairly and the harrassment going on against me is not being publically condemned. I want to remove remarks from my userpage which I believe are not fair. There is nothing in Wikipedia policy saying I cannot erase parts of my userpage. Now if you want to change the policy then so be it. In the meantime, don't mess with my userpage. I don't believe the Wikpedia policy about minority view articles is being enforced. Please do not lecture me about your notions of etiquette especially since I have expressed a desire to not have it reverted. kdbuffalo
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,532,109
|
` bad faith exhibited: Terms like ``fundie`` and linking BSF to a political movement the Christian Right which has done some good things but some stupid things also, it shows bad faith. Calling me a Bible literalist even though I explicitly said I was not is bad faith. MickWest making imperious edits over and over again until you are told to stop by Mark that is bad faith. Duncharrris not acknowledging my excellent sources like medical historians, etc is bad faith. Not following the minority view policy which says ``there is no size limit to Wikipedia`` and the minority view can go into ``great detail`` is bad faith. I have not attempted to censor the anti-BSF view unless they are making stuff up with no sources and turning the article into a editorital page. Now what is the silence about some of these issues but bad faith? Again, you cannot reason with the unreasonable. ==The central issue== Now the anti-BSF wants a mainly popular view article in a minority view article. I say if you want that start your own article. I don't really care if you do. Wikipedia has the minority view article policy whether you like it or not. kdbuffalo`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,532,301
|
` Ang again, I have no problem with the NPOV policy it is merely that the minority view should not be stifled in a minority view article. Here is the policy again: ``None of this, however, is to say that minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can possibly give them on pages specifically devoted to those views. There is no size limit to Wikipedia. But even on such pages, though a view is spelled out possibly in great detail, we still make sure that the view is not represented as the truth.`` `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,534,262
|
` == true cooperation will likely never happen == ==cooperation is asked for but is true cooperation asked for?== I don't have any problem with the NPOV rule. I just see censorship over and over. Wikipedia is clear: ``None of this, however, is to say that minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can possibly give them on pages specifically devoted to those views. There is no size limit to Wikipedia. But even on such pages, though a view is spelled out possibly in great detail, we still make sure that the view is not represented as the truth.`` Now I have wanted to have cooperation and have good faith efforts on both sides. I have listened to the other side and taken feedback. I made some changes although admittedly not a lot. However, Cooperation may never happen. Why? Here is why: 1. Does some person keep changing the theological conservative Christianity internal link in the Biblical scientific foreknowledge (BSF) article so it goes to the Christian right (Falwell, etc). Would a person who wants to act in good faith do that? 2. Would people who act in good faith send harrassing messages (``fundie`` etc). I think the people calling for cooperation yet saying absolutely nothing publically about the bad behavior of certain anti-BSF parties are not seeking true cooperation. What they are asking for is the minority view be trampled despite the Wikipedia policy. kdbuffalo ==addendum== The Bible says the heart is deceitfully wicked above all things. The above devious tactics are not a great surprise. Now you can pretend that someone is not changing the conservative Christianity link to Christian right. You can pretend MickWest is not harrassing me with messages to my userpage I said I did not want but that doesn't make it so. You can choose not to view duncharris's userpage. That is your choice but don't ask me to endorse it. I am not going to. I am not going to exist in LaLa land and pretend MickWest and Duncharris are reasonable. They have shown they are not and it is likely not going to change. I can adjust to this and recognize this matter. I suggest you do the same. Now you say BSF is minority. Does the Bible say the universe had a beginning? Do scientist increasinng recognize this matter? Do major medical historians recognize where the Bible was ahead of its time? Yes they do. Now I cannot help people's ignorance regarding these matters but I am not going to let it decide for me my position.`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,534,759
|
==more bad faith== I cited the bad faith acts of others. It was called a ad hominem. A ad hominem is an attack on a person. I cited actions. People's actions are not ad hominem. This was all deleted. I consider this act and act of bad faith. Thank pjacobi for letting me know where you stand. I see you are adept at censoring too. I find this regrettable. kdbuffalo
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,536,027
|
` == to: KMH03, REGARDING MOST OF CHRISTENDOM == Now you say BSF is minority. Does the Bible say the universe had a beginning? Do scientist increasinng recognize this matter? Did I cite major medical historians stating the Bible was ahead of its time? I did. Now I cannot help people's ignorance regarding some of these matters but I am not going to let it decide for me my position. Secondly, you keep saying over and over about BSF being the minority view in Christendom. I say, ``So what?`` Am I supposed to follow ``the herd``. If I were to follow the herd mentality to its logical conclusion I would be headed for hell right now. Jesus said, ``Many are called but few are chosen.`` Is this a minority view article protected under the Wikpedia minority view article rule? Yes. In short, please stop stating its a minority view. I know this. I see it as irrelevant as I can cite over and over again where the minority view was right. I regret having to tell you this but there are a huge amount of majority views were once minority views. Its irrelevant. BSF is a multidisciplinary issue and it is not surprising to me that it is minority. I think this should be a evidential issue and not a polling booth. So let me make this point clear. I know its minority. I am not concerned in respects to its legitimacy or illegitimacy. kdbuffalo`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,536,943
|
== Winifred Brunton (Wikiquette, good faith, be nice...)... == Winifred's painting technique for the pharaonic portraits: . . . I turned to the statutes and reliefs. These would show me how the sitters impressed the artists of those days, and the work of an artist's chisel or brush is at least as good evidence as the sworn word of a witness in a court of law, at any rate when the artist is as literal-minded as were the Egyptians. Do we not know the honest mistakes a man in the witness-box can make? And shall we not concede the difference between a trained and an untrained observer? The ancient artist was a trained observer; I would examine his trained evidence on what he saw, and compare it with what I could see today of the Pharaohs. This done, discrepancies appeared which could not be disregarded. And besides, the various artists who portrayed a Pharaoh did not all agree in detail among themselves. This added to the difficulty! It was evident that some detailed and perhaps laborious comparing would have to be done. I had recourse again to the mummy, and took the face carefully back through the process of mummification. Certain confirmations appeared of the artists' evidence; these I accepted and retained, especially as they seemed to me to agree with the king's known character. Discrepancies on the other hand could be partly accounted for by the changes in the subject between youth and old age, and partly by the deference due to kings. Finally I did construct a firm scaffolding on which to build my portrait, and so the picture of Sety I was begun. The costume was a simpler problem. One had only to consult the monuments and the jewel-room of the Museum, and to be careful to avoid howlers such as a dinner party parure with a field-service helmet, and so on. Ramses II was next attempted, and I was greatly cheered by the recognition of my resuscitated kings by several eminent archaeologists. Not all the Egyptologists who recognised my portraits realised the method in my madness, the slow sifting of evidence and the laborious brick-making. To many they seemed flights of a fancy only slightly, if at all, controlled by research. ''But one of the most famous of them all, namely Professor Breasted, gave me enormous encouragement. Whatever was to be thought of these particular portraits, he admitted that this was a line of research not hitherto tried, but perfectly legitimate and which might conceivably yield valuable results. His kind words so stimulated me that I made similar attempts with other defunct royalties, and gradually completed the series of kings and queens which appear in these pages.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,537,597
|
== final thoughts on this matter == My view is that Mark and you do not do malicious things to the article. If everyone where like you and mark who disagreed with me there would be no problem here. Any conflict of ideas could be worked out. This has not been the case though. I know this page like it or not has been like a creationism page with harrassment and other unsavory tactics being employed. I would be foolish not to recognize this given what I have experienced. Now I don't think the anti-BSF people who are not like you and Mark are likely going to change or don't need to change. You may think so. You may think they can be worked with. I think if they could be worked with they would have to be held more accountable for their actions and this is likely not going to happen given the amount of silence that is occuring. The creationism article tells me that Wikipedia is not very interested in protecting minority view articles anyways.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,541,017
|
No, I am trying to be civil as possible. I will give proof to the show which is about dancing in a New York City nightclub or the Lincoln Center concert hall. Does the police raid nightclubs? I am not sure. 4.188.98.84
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,541,584
|
` TO: KMH03 AND MARK I am not slipping. I have taken responsibility for my actions said I should not have created the bio of duncharris. I shouldn't have done this. Two wrongs do not make a right. I also realize that mark is right I should use the term non-BSF. Thirdly, I am very aware via the creationism article that it is the minority view people who are not respected. Are they given a chance to present info or is the article overrun by the consensus contrary to the minority view article policy? I think we know the answer to this question. But Wikipedia doesn't really care about respecting minority view articles in many cases. Now I realize that some want to take a cookie cutter approach and let the consensus view dominate, overrun and even trample minority view articles. This is not Wikipedia policy though. Now you can say I am unreasonable but it is simply not true. Now I saw Mark's ``assuming that Wikipedia doesn't work`` comment. I do think it is fair to ask if the creationism article is working. Is it working? Is there much civility like some (not many) internet creation-evolution forums I have seen? No there isn't civility. It is a failure. I believe Wikipedia fails in issues like creationism. I think it is a failure due to mismanagement or due to premeditation. But I believe it is a failure. I know it is not blasphemy to say Wikipedia fails in issues like this. Minority view people are often not respected at Wikipedia even in minority view articles. Now why was the Conservative Christianity repeatedly changed to Christian right? Is it because of magnaninimous generosity of a person in the non-BSF camp? No it wasn't. Perhaps in the future articles like creationism will have the minority view truly aired and done in accordance with the current Wikipedia rules. But I think this is unrealistic at this time as I see no commitment at this time.`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,543,111
|
==I got your message regarding boorishness== Dear Mark, There came a point where I believed that certain non-BSF people were going to whittle down and mischaracterize the BSF position and could not be reasoned with. It comes from watching atheist/Christian boards where atheist of the militant atheist variety cannot be reasoned with and are quite hostile. At that point, I mocked and taunted certain non-BSF people for censorship (which they were engaging in) and mocked sources/links like Farrell Till that the non-BSF side was offering. I do realize that I was very probably breaking Wikipedia rules there. I also recognize that asking Duncharris to prove he was sincere by actions and rebuffing what I thought was a faux friendship letter was somewhat premature. I should have made greater attempts to see if it was sincere. I will tell you what I will do. I will send duncharris and MickWest a peace offering letter. If it works then fine. If not, nothing lost. kdbuffalo
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,554,887
|
*sigh*. people always forget this. it doesn't matter how much bits a system had, it depends in what year it was released in. the eras are based on the dominant bits the majority of the home consoles used
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,559,471
|
` -[[e|]] [[ | e-mail]] `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,559,889
|
`historical evidences of such an institution in Sagres during the presence of Prince Henry. The School of Sagres is a later ``production`` from some authors Therefore, one must understand the idea of “School of Sagres”, not in the physical and institutional sense, but as a to have the idea for it. The recent Peter Russell book Prince Henry the Navigator: A Life presents good historical evidence that Henry was indeed instrumental in the conquest of Ceuta, and not simply part of the ``operation``.`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,570,569
|
` :Thanks Ral315. I don't know what you enjoyed about it so much, but thanks all the same. ::Oh, I like Ann, you see, and I just love it when people post information about her. Athough, as an admin I have to pretend not to like it. I do really though. ;-) `
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,570,827
|
` :Thanks Ral315. I don't know what you enjoyed about it so much, but thanks all the same. ::Oh, I like Ann, you see, and I just love it when people post information about her. Athough, as an admin I have to pretend not to like it. I do really though. ;-) I like it so much :::Ral, its nice of you to say that. I know, as a 15 yoear old teenager your imagination may run wild sometimes, but you need to keep a handle on things. Thanks for your input. `
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,571,038
|
Well do I have to spell out my feelings toward Ann? I mean I now you are an anonymous user and I am an admin, but it should be pretty obvious even to a newbie.| ::::I still don't understand what you are saying Drini, and I don't understand how this is relevant to creating an encylopedia :::::Well, maybe theres a lot of things you don't understand, and my relationship to Ann is just one of them. |
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,571,489
|
:Hi can't we all be civilized about this? In what sense was what I was doing threatening? Hmm? Did you think about that? Hmm? Did you? :And tell Ann that maybe she shouldn't post so much personal information online. Its pretty easy to get her address details from the amount of information she has posted on her page. And then anything might be sent in the post.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,571,761
|
::Oh, and another thing. That section about mail bombs was information on how to protect yourself from mailbombs, not a threat. If she might be sent some, she should at least have some information about how to protect herself. By the way, why do you seem to think I'm in Thailand? Just because my IP address says so? Why would someone in Thailand have such a clear grudge against someone in Ireland?
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,584,931
|
== Youth == Does anyone else agree that the youth of Didcot, namely the chavs, are creating a serious problem in Didcot? Until recently, it seemed as if everything was calming down...but now, there are stabbings and everything occuring. Is it just the chavs to blame, or is it the youth population as a whole?
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,589,321
|
:::There's no need to apologize. A Wikipedia article is made for reconciling knowledge about a subject from different sources, and you've done history studies and not archaeology studies, I guess. I could scan the page, e-mail it to you, and then you could ask someone to translate the page.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
23,590,628
|
2005 :::Hello Ben. May I start by noting that you have not attended to a single point I have made, but merely made unfounded protestations without any factual evidence to back them; please write all sources and proof if you have a factual point to make? These reverts to the long-standing article were not my writings, they were edits back to a well-accepted compromise (a fact you surreptitiously ignore), and the main text has been in an approved state for months now. Two separate administrators are happily with its compromise from both sides, but you appear to think you can smash in here like a bull in a china store, and rearrange the whole lot based on your own religious biases and PR campaigns for the Watchtower org. As I kindly pointed out Ben, please read all the talk pages, yes all 14 of them before you do any more vandalizing, and make casual unfounded accusations. These subjects have been debated many times and a common compromise was reached months ago, which you appear clearly not interested in. Your selfishness in trying to destroy the hard work of others and their extensive debates on these matters is quite typical of many with your religious background (the blinkered view that any method is acceptable if it makes the JWs look good in the public eye). Censorship is not welcome here, especially when it has a blatant religious agenda and bias. You have failed to make a single point of valid criticism that has not been discussed at great length before (please go and read all 14 pages of talk) as you might start to understand why you are being so unreasonable and astoundingly narrow-minded. Wikipedia is here for factual information, not public relation promotions for religious sects; if you want that then go to the Watchtower's website. If you have a specific point with referenced proof and backup, then bring it here and discuss it, but please check it has not already been done before, and please don't come out with more nebulous vague accusation with no specific point or proof. If you have facts you feel are incorrect, then produce your documented proof with references, then it can be discussed here in a mature way, before any possible changes are made. Your current behaviour is highly offensive to all editors and contributors to Wikipedia. Regards. 20th of September, 2005
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,599,201
|
== your user name == You should lend your username to that Gordon Watts! Oww... I've got a splitting headache seeing him spam talk pages and my watchlist. PS I've not logged in as I don't want him tracking me.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,599,986
|
` :This is becoming quite childish. I have done an unimagineable amount of work to fix up the Baha'i pages. I've tried everything possible to get the picture removed, and I've removed as many references as possible of anti-Baha'i sentiment. I've been called a Baha'i propagandist for all the stuff I've done. You can send whatever you want to Macau. Your edits have been disruptive, and I have a hunch you're not even a Baha'i. Once again, read the mountain of talk pages about the picture. There are several Baha'is editing wiki and they are all in agreement that there is nothing we can do to get the picture removed. 20px - `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
23,633,505
|
Dear Wiki Editors. I still have another couple of pages, but go ahead and start digging into it of you like.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,645,499
|
==Don't You Just Love A Happy Ending?== oe the line Toe the line Wake up your time is nearly over No more the supernova And no action guaranteed Wake up you've had an operation Ideals above your station Too much reality Think about the waste of time spending Watching Mother Nature's knees bending Everybody loves a happy ending Wake up you're on your own agenda Give up the great pretender With baby eyes of green Wake up you're holding on to nothing You know you're only bluffing As dead as autumn leaves Think about the waste of time spending Watching Mother Nature's knees bending Everybody loves a happy ending Don't you just love a happy ending? Oh yeah well so do I And all your love will shine on everyone The darkness of the day A curse in every way You try to see the light But you don't know why Don't know why They tell you on the phone To give your God a bone And grow a set of wings like a butterfly The guarding at the gate Reminds you that you're late You try to take your time But you toe the line Toe the line The children of the world And daddy's little girl The grass is always green on the other side So stay and breathe new lies Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up Wake up, wake up Everything is moving faster than you think (Wake up, wake up) Your pen is running out of ink (Wake up, wake up) Fill up your bath and kitchen sink (Wake up, wake up) They're really kicking up the stink (Wake up, wake up) You've never found the missing link (Wake up, wake up) You should be happy and to think (Wake up, wake up) You're rending members out of sync (Wake up, wake up) And God is whiskered as a wink (Wake up, wake up) Once more are different to the brink
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,645,769
|
`Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mahatma, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! | Esperanza `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
23,648,468
|
Unfortunatly there are some people in Tasmania who will use this proxy server to vandalize Wikipedia. I am sure that the government find this of extreme importance, and a simple notifier of the time (as long as the vandalism of an extreme nature) should be reported to show who has been vandalizing this valuable page. I'm not sure the schools could handle a ban though.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,650,772
|
`Interesting, so you have read this, but you refuse to respond to the accusations you know them to be highly merititious. I'm still trying to figure out the appropriate channels to figure out how to ``prosecute`` an arbitrator abuse case, but until then, I'd be VERY interested to hear your defense, since you've not ever attempted to make a single one beyond vague, general accusations. I think I may open a Request for Arbitrartion against you if necessary, but obviously that's problematic when you're dealing with arbitrarors who made the error in question. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,653,639
|
== Ceres stamps == Thanks for doing Ceres series (Portugal), I learned some new stuff from it! I fixed up the language a bit. It would be nice to scan in a design from continental Portugal, perhaps when I get back home (am on a trip right now).
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,655,442
|
You are sadly paranoid. Pharlap doesn't even exist on wikipedia and you keep looking over your shoulder and tellin it to the world that you don't give a damn about Pharlap and how unhappy Pharlap is. Yo..get a clue..your imaginary friend..Pharlap took his ball and threw it for a long buoyant trip off a short pier..a long time ago..don't keep chasing after it. :You probably think that *I* am Pharlap! MUAHAHAHAHA. See ya around, dcnoise. Peace to ya!
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,658,567
|
Article is ready for review and edits.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,668,486
|
Name pronunciation again == I corrected the IPA: with a /t/ sound (cf. final devoicing) and with a schwa. This is how it is usually pronounced in German (besides being German myself, I took courses on his philosophy, so I should know). However, he was Austrian, so I guess he himself might have pronounced his given name ['lu:tvi:k]. Anon. ==
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,677,598
|
==Fine Example== Nathaniel: A little birdie told me how your diligent work developing the welding and vocational type articles, received special recognition in Munich. I'm not into passing around those silly barn stars n crap, so let this note serves as my acknowledgment and special recognition of your sober and steadfast work. I also noticed your home page comment expressing frustration about edit-war entrapment, and thus your renewed focus upon simple article contribution.... You are a fine example. Take care, Erin.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,679,193
|
Here is your link, again, so don't saaume, but read it this time: http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/blog/archives/000045.html
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,679,560
|
== Whereabouts of a link ==
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,688,191
|
` As I mentioned it to you before, you have to read all those posts more carefully. The thing you say here are the same ones that you sayed then, and had no worth, as you were mistaking by not having read the provided data thoroughly. You need to do that now in order to see what you failed to se then. It is very clear in fact, I saw it the first time I read it, but it can be that you had a ``proove-me-right`` set of glasses then. Now you have the possibility to see what you failed to see so long ago, so please seize to the occasion, and read it one more time. I am confident that you are able to see it through now. -`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,689,609
|
Maybe you are interested in this page's talk South Shetland Islands
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
23,694,665
|
` == I hate you! == I can't belive you. You are SO WRONG about the Ages in Myst III: Exile. Such total scum. Everyting about you is stupid. You (stupidly) think there are such Myst III Ages as ``Amateria`` or ``Edanna`` or ``Narayan`` but know ``Teorlemin``, ``Tonditios``, or ``HAST THRI IXIL. And that you never explore Releeshahn? J'nanin is not the hub age! There are too many things wrong about this asshole to name. He is low-class scum. I am way richer then this asshole welfare bum. I am way more educated then you are too. Pathetic. Play some Myst III and see that you are ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!!!`
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
23,697,173
|
I think the header should stay. Please don't transpose every dog related page to be the same, they aren't the same. Ciao
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,705,202
|
::Agreed. We should keep the history, just condense it. For example, we don't need a header for every date - maybe three sections, like Early History, Later History, and Current History?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
23,708,631
|
` :I've never let something as small as ``someone else did it`` stop me taking credit for work... only kidding. Do you think it would be wise to add Category:Wiccan Wikipedians to Category:Pagan Wikipedians by the way? 2000 `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,712,376
|
::Please elucidate me why you think NOT have a compressed TOC would make it easier for newbies to find info. My personal feeling is you want everything to be done the same i.e. YOUR way, rather than let things just flow
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,715,182
|
` == Cafe Racer == Hi, I'd like to be pedantic here. Can you help me move Cafe racer back to Cafe Racer. A Cafe Racer is a Cafe Racer. Not a Café Racer. Indeed, they were originally spoken `` Caff Racers `` as they were used to race from Caff [ pronounced Kaff ] to Caff. Again, this is a British thing. English-English rules apply. Not a French thing. If you want to be accurate and Wiki to be accuate, do not apply `` dictionary rules `` unless you actually know - or were involved - with the actual history of these things and know that you are right. By all means have a link from Café for folk that get it wrong but emphatically, there were cafe or caff racers. [ Much the reason for this was that British typewriters did not have an e with an acute and Caff is where you wen for coffee and tea. ] Thanks.`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,717,699
|
` [``poisonous`` content previously posted here removed.] thanks for your work on merkey related stuff I wanted to thank you for what is probably otherwise a very thankless task. Here's my reading on the case. This is a fight that's spilled over from somewhere else on the Internet. None of the participants have much of a clue about Wikipedia's culture of kindness. There are people who love trolling Jeff Merkey because he's easily excited. We should do our best to encourage all of them to take their fight elsewhere, before their poisonous attitudes start to make us irritated with each other. Anyway, it's good to see you in there.Jimbo Wales At any rate,`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,718,951
|
Can anyone find a Blue Paul Terrier picture we can use for the Table ?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
23,719,859
|
User Categorization Hello! We are working on a new system that will categorize the users. Please take a moment to move into the category Category:Wikipedians in Virginia and removing your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Virginia page. To add your name to the category, please use the tag [[Category:Wikipedians in Viginia|Cyrad]] to sort yourself correctly.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,723,042
|
:Also, Edwards Airforce base was being questioned as well, due to its wide and long runway. | DOWN
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,732,380
|
:::: Well, crows are connected to death in western cultures. The Crow article talks about this a little.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,732,559
|
:Funny, I had just changed that. Bretagne doesn't mean 'Little Britain' (afaik), but it was called that by the British settlers in the early middle ages. Or it might be that those British used a term meaning 'Little Britain' which the French then adopted and which then changed to 'Bretagne' over time. I wouldn't be surprised. After all we're talking 1500 years ago and words can change a lot over such a long time. Come to think of it it's quite surprising that the words 'Britain' and 'Bretagne' are still so much alike.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
23,735,538
|
:Depends on if graphic novel based movies should be a separate list, is it? Also I'm moving this to inc-video, I hope that's okay
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,737,461
|
` September 2005 (UTC) ::``You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain`` 08:09, 22`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,738,170
|
== September 2005 == You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
23,738,589
|
` %) Igor intervention to explain the error this was and come with prooves 6) The person having registered with the data you come whith made an intervention and declared he was the person having send the message. 7) End of story for all, but you still kept talking about it on the same page. With you on wiki, and science, the statement should be: `` If you have problems with lack of facts, insults, dishonnesty, and arbitrary doom, you better leave wiki and science``. You see, I am here to restaure the truth or at least try to make some damage control in the storm of facts crossing a forest of lies, that you left behind you. You are still insulting me, as you have insulted all person no matter what grade and what PhD, on all forums, who dared presenting you some facts you didn't like seeing, and especially to be seen by others. So you simply insulted them and adress the i a way as if what they sayed was, irrelevant, or not true, or by questionning their qualifications or their identity, or their sanity, or by calling them idiots. Most of the opponents simply left as it isn't normal nor good tone and etiquette in Science to adress one another on that way. But how should you know? You never sensed the boundary between you and the rest of the world, just like a baby. So baby, it is time to wake up now, and show some more respect to the world at large, and have a touch of humility in your uttering. Except the fact that you are lying, all facts in wikipedia are as good as it can get, in the given conditions. Make amend for you insults, or please do not make any more interventions here. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,740,432
|
:You must have small fonts I cannot see the full page without the TOC, the TOC takes up one line that is it.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
23,751,748
|
`, 22 September 2005 (UTC) ::````You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.`` 13:42`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
23,751,934
|
`, 22 September 2005 (UTC) ::``````You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his manservant, or his maidservant, or his ox, or his ass, or anything that is your neighbor's.`` 13:45`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
23,754,666
|
== Lying, scheming, vindictive Weasel == Burn in hell.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
23,755,223
|
== Burn in hell Weasel == Don't believe the JEWISH HOLOCAU$T LIES.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.