figmtu/enron_personalization_dev_uncapped · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 1 4.46k	employee_id stringclasses 45 values
Let me know and we can do this at one of their safety meetings.......	dev45.message.text
David Roensch	dev45.message.text
Kermit Team, I received a letter from the TNRCC concerning emissions fees that have not been paid for a facility called the "Hendrick/Wink Tank Farm".	dev45.message.text
The letter was addressed to a Mr. Paul Newman of EOTT.	dev45.message.text
The letter stated that we may owe emissions fees for the facility.	dev45.message.text
My question is, do you have such a facility in your team area, and what does it comprise?	dev45.message.text
ie..number and size of tanks, throughput in 2000.	dev45.message.text
The TNRCC letter was dated March 28, 2001 and we are required to provide information to them within 30 days.	dev45.message.text
I just received the letter today.	dev45.message.text
HELP!!	dev45.message.text
I need something from you by this afternoon or tomorrow at the latest.	dev45.message.text
Kermit Team, I really need your assistance on this.	dev45.message.text
I received a notice from the TNRCC about the above facility.	dev45.message.text
Apparently, the emissions fees for the facility have not been paid for 2000.	dev45.message.text
In light of this, does this facility exist in your area of responsibility?	dev45.message.text
Please let me know.	dev45.message.text
If so, I need the follwoing information ASAP to aviod an NOV for the facility.	dev45.message.text
Size of each tank height and capacity Number of tanks Color of tank(s) and roof(s) fixed or floating roof if floating, internal or external primary or secondary seals how is tank loaded and or unloaded ie trucks, pipeline etc...	dev45.message.text
Relative vapor pressure if known monthly throughput maximum fill rate of tank how long does it take to fill tank	dev45.message.text
Alison, have you found out anything about the above referenced?	dev45.message.text
The deadline for submitting the FY 2001 emissions fee is April 30.	dev45.message.text
The TNRCC can levee a fine on the facility if we dont provide them with some informaiton pretty fast.	dev45.message.text
Your assistance in this will be appreciated.	dev45.message.text
Alison, better send me what you have via fed-x or fax (505) 627-8172.	dev45.message.text
I have spoken to Bill about this.	dev45.message.text
We need to send a check to the agency to cover ourselves prior to the April 30 deadline.	dev45.message.text
I beleive that EOTT is responsible for paying the fee.	dev45.message.text
I have left a message with Larry Fensted and his associate Ruth Ann and expressed the need for the $416.00 check by 4/1.	dev45.message.text
I am sending this notification to your department to seek a solution of halting and stopping inappropriate e mail materials which I am receiving.	dev45.message.text
I have been requested by Louis Soldano, Enron attorney for the Gas Pipeline Group, to apprise you of this situation.	dev45.message.text
The content of materials received, I consider offensive, and am sure it would also be considered objectionable and innappropriate by the standards of Enron Corporation.	dev45.message.text
Please be advised, that many times it is difficult to screen this material based upon the headings and titles that accompany the contents.	dev45.message.text
Consequently, innappropriate materials such as this are opened.	dev45.message.text
I have accidently opened two such e mails by mistake and have received the "Enron warning" that my name and mailbox will be or may be audited in the future and that my name has been placed in a file.	dev45.message.text
Because of this, I am extremely uncomfortable about future accidents occuring and more importantly, about the increased frequency and accessability of my e mail box to trash and questionable materials.	dev45.message.text
I would appreciate your immediate attention in this matter.	dev45.message.text
Thank you very much.	dev45.message.text
Randy, this is a short summary of the environmental findings that were identified during the records review conducted at the Corpus Christi Koch facility offices on May 1st and 2nd of this year.	dev45.message.text
All environmental records which were available in the file data room at the Koch office were reviewed.	dev45.message.text
Assumptions were made that the environmental records were complete for all assets included in the sale.	dev45.message.text
Primary emphasis was placed on those environmental issues which are normally associated with a sale or purchase of assets dealing with distribution and transmission of crude oil.	dev45.message.text
In particular, pipeline and tank farms were the most critical assets which were reviewed.	dev45.message.text
Based upon the data review, the Koch assets were in compliance with the following: Air permitting, permit by rule, standard expemtions, recordkeeping and fee payments were documented NSPS recordkeeping and inspections for VOC control on large crude oil tanks were documented Oil Pollution Act-OPA 90 plans had been prepared and were up to date SARA compliance and reporting had been completed SPCC plans had been prepared for each site which qualified under 40 CFR 112 Spill reporting history and notifications to the state agency were available for review There are ongoing groundwater and soil remediation activities at one site included in the asset for sale (permits for the remediation activity is in place) Hazardous waste notifications, annual reportings and fee payments were documented Based upon the above review, there were no issues which could be identified which would be condsidered a major environmental limitation or would be a considered a major environmental liability.	dev45.message.text
This statement is again based upon the assumption that all environmental information was present in the data room for the assets in question.	dev45.message.text
It should also be stated that this analysis of Koch's environmental compliance is based upon the fact that Koch has not held back or provided false or misleading information or knowledge during their presentation or informaiton contained in the facility files.	dev45.message.text
Pending further development and interest of this potential purchase, a recommendation is made to conduct a phase I due diligence and site visit to each location to verify findings from the records review.	dev45.message.text
Also, due to the past history of Koch's operating practices, it is recommended that contract conditions be implicitly stated that EOTT will not be held liable for discoveries of past deficiencies or releases of contamination which have occurred on any of the Koch assets purchased.	dev45.message.text
On behalf of EOTT, an environmental records review was completed for a block of Koch crude oil pipeline assets located in south Texas.	dev45.message.text
There were no issues or environmental deficiencies identified during the review.	dev45.message.text
A due diligence was recommended to verify confirmation of the housekeeping activities presented in the records review.	dev45.message.text
The air permit modification for the La Plata C/S was received from the state of Colorado.	dev45.message.text
This modification allows for additional emissions and fuel use as a result of a change in gas quality supplies in the San Juan basin.	dev45.message.text
Butch, you may want to attend this	dev45.message.text
Shudeish, the buildings and stack heights for each of the Flagstaff And Kingman Compressor Stations are presented below.	dev45.message.text
Building and stack demensions (in feet), are as follows: FLAGSTAFF length width height Port a Camp 40 10 10 Let me know if you need anything else.....	dev45.message.text
Randy, based upon the records review, this is the only issue that may be aproblem.	dev45.message.text
If a tank has been moved to another location, it would trigger requirements which were enacted on the date of the relocation.	dev45.message.text
For instancif a tank constructed prior to 1973 was moved in 1978, there would be emissions control requirements placed on the tank as required by the 1978tank regulations.	dev45.message.text
If the tank had remained at its original location, it would be grandfathered with respect to emissions.	dev45.message.text
However, because the tanwas relocated, it is looked upon as being a tank constructed in 1978 and subject to the 1978 regulations and is no longer grandfathered.	dev45.message.text
I was not given this information during the records review, so I dont know if any of the tanks apply.	dev45.message.text
If any of the tanks fit into the above scenerio,EOTT or Koch will be looking at some major $$$$$ to bring any subject tankinto compliance.	dev45.message.text
Generally speaking, the regualtions and costs to complyincrease as a function of date.	dev45.message.text
1.	dev45.message.text
Q. Of the tanks listed on the spreadsheet, have any of the tanks been relocated from its original construction locations?	dev45.message.text
List the tank, date moved and location moved to.	dev45.message.text
A. Benevides Station Tank 6125 and Mirando Station Tank 28591 were relocatto those stations.	dev45.message.text
Three Rivers Tanks 28508 and 28100 were relocated andre-erected at that station.	dev45.message.text
Duval Station Tank 28052 and Mirando Station28045 were relocated and re-erected at those stations prior to Koch,sacquisition of those assets.	dev45.message.text
Arnold, I have attached a spreadsheet showing what information I need to complete the air permit applications.	dev45.message.text
I have set the Flagstaff site as the model, due to its elevation and temperature which is the worst case site.	dev45.message.text
Let me know if there are any problems with the attached data request.	dev45.message.text
Scott, I have sent out twice a request to each of the field teams in the Midland Region to provide some desperately needed tank information to determine compliance for all the EOTT crude oil tanks in the Midland area.	dev45.message.text
So far, only the Midland, Lovington, Kermit, Andrews, Hobbs and Jal teams have responded.	dev45.message.text
I would appreciate your assistance in motivating the remaining seven teams to get this information to me at their earliest convenience.	dev45.message.text
I have attached the most recent update of the tank spreadsheet for you to pass on to the teams.	dev45.message.text
Thanks for the help.	dev45.message.text
Hazardous waste fees were submitted to the state of Arizona.	dev45.message.text
Emissions fees were submitted to the state of New Mexico For C/S's 7,8,9, Atoka No. 3 and Bloomfield.	dev45.message.text
Submitted to the state of Texas an admisistraitve revision for the "like for like" replacement of an IC engine at Irion Co. No. 1 C/S.	dev45.message.text
To meet the requirements of 2 gms for NOx, a catalytic converter has been installed on the replacement unit.	dev45.message.text
Submitted to the state of New Mexico notification of a "like for like" replacement of an I/C engine at Atoka No. 2 C/S.	dev45.message.text
A revised Title V application was submitted to Region VI, EPA for C/S No. 6, Laguna.	dev45.message.text
The emissions inventory for the TW Keystone C/S was submitted to the state of Texas.	dev45.message.text
The spreadsheet development for the EOTT tanks in the Midland Region has slowed down.	dev45.message.text
Six of 13 teams have responded with tank information.	dev45.message.text
A request was made to Scott Clark, Regional Director, to assist in notifying the teams of the importance of submitting this data.	dev45.message.text
Louie/Ed I know you guys are busy, but because of the emphasis Enron places on ensuring that action items from consolidated audits are completed prior to the action item completion date, I really need to know how Scott and I are to proceed on the subsurface drilling activities for potential contamination at the Bakersfield Fractionator.	dev45.message.text
The scheduled completion date for six of the items is 6/30.	dev45.message.text
I understand the there is an issue concerning Koch's individual and shared responsibility for some of the issues identified during the audit.	dev45.message.text
Rich Jolly has contacted me asking me when the drilling will begin, as he does not want to see us exceed the 6/30 date and have the items show up as deliquent in his region.	dev45.message.text
Whatever you can do to assist us in either initiating the investigations or placing a hold on the drilling would be greatly appreciated.	dev45.message.text
Ed, I would appreciate it very much if you would review the action item list from Scott Jones and choose which items are Koch's responsibility and which items belong to EOTT, and let Scott and I know.	dev45.message.text
Ill contact Scott and have him send you the action item list for your review.	dev45.message.text
As I had previously mentioned, Scott and I have until 6/30 to complete the subsurface investigations and knowing which items are EOTT's and which are Koch's would greatly help us.	dev45.message.text
As Scott's server is down, Ill phone him and have him send you the action item list.	dev45.message.text
Again Thanks very much.	dev45.message.text
Under the regulations of the state of Arizona, facilities which have a pollution prevention plan (sta.1, sta. 2 and Needles) are required to have an annual training to evaluate pollution prevention activiies.	dev45.message.text
I have scheduled with the above three facilities to have pollution training on the following dates: Kingman team June 21 Flagstaff team June 22 This training is to be completed by July 1 of every year.	dev45.message.text
This training will last for approximately 2-3 hours.	dev45.message.text

Let me know and we can do this at one of their safety meetings.......

dev45.message.text

David Roensch

dev45.message.text

Kermit Team, I received a letter from the TNRCC concerning emissions fees that have not been paid for a facility called the "Hendrick/Wink Tank Farm".

dev45.message.text

The letter was addressed to a Mr. Paul Newman of EOTT.

dev45.message.text

The letter stated that we may owe emissions fees for the facility.

dev45.message.text

My question is, do you have such a facility in your team area, and what does it comprise?

dev45.message.text

ie..number and size of tanks, throughput in 2000.

dev45.message.text

The TNRCC letter was dated March 28, 2001 and we are required to provide information to them within 30 days.

dev45.message.text

I just received the letter today.

dev45.message.text

HELP!!

dev45.message.text

I need something from you by this afternoon or tomorrow at the latest.

dev45.message.text

Kermit Team, I really need your assistance on this.

dev45.message.text

I received a notice from the TNRCC about the above facility.

dev45.message.text

Apparently, the emissions fees for the facility have not been paid for 2000.

dev45.message.text

In light of this, does this facility exist in your area of responsibility?

dev45.message.text

Please let me know.

dev45.message.text

If so, I need the follwoing information ASAP to aviod an NOV for the facility.

dev45.message.text

Size of each tank height and capacity Number of tanks Color of tank(s) and roof(s) fixed or floating roof if floating, internal or external primary or secondary seals how is tank loaded and or unloaded ie trucks, pipeline etc...

dev45.message.text

Relative vapor pressure if known monthly throughput maximum fill rate of tank how long does it take to fill tank

dev45.message.text

Alison, have you found out anything about the above referenced?

dev45.message.text

The deadline for submitting the FY 2001 emissions fee is April 30.

dev45.message.text

The TNRCC can levee a fine on the facility if we dont provide them with some informaiton pretty fast.

dev45.message.text

Your assistance in this will be appreciated.

dev45.message.text

Alison, better send me what you have via fed-x or fax (505) 627-8172.

dev45.message.text

I have spoken to Bill about this.

dev45.message.text

We need to send a check to the agency to cover ourselves prior to the April 30 deadline.

dev45.message.text

I beleive that EOTT is responsible for paying the fee.

dev45.message.text

I have left a message with Larry Fensted and his associate Ruth Ann and expressed the need for the $416.00 check by 4/1.

dev45.message.text

I am sending this notification to your department to seek a solution of halting and stopping inappropriate e mail materials which I am receiving.

dev45.message.text

I have been requested by Louis Soldano, Enron attorney for the Gas Pipeline Group, to apprise you of this situation.

dev45.message.text

The content of materials received, I consider offensive, and am sure it would also be considered objectionable and innappropriate by the standards of Enron Corporation.

dev45.message.text

Please be advised, that many times it is difficult to screen this material based upon the headings and titles that accompany the contents.

dev45.message.text

Consequently, innappropriate materials such as this are opened.

dev45.message.text

I have accidently opened two such e mails by mistake and have received the "Enron warning" that my name and mailbox will be or may be audited in the future and that my name has been placed in a file.

dev45.message.text

Because of this, I am extremely uncomfortable about future accidents occuring and more importantly, about the increased frequency and accessability of my e mail box to trash and questionable materials.

dev45.message.text

I would appreciate your immediate attention in this matter.

dev45.message.text

Thank you very much.

dev45.message.text

Randy, this is a short summary of the environmental findings that were identified during the records review conducted at the Corpus Christi Koch facility offices on May 1st and 2nd of this year.

dev45.message.text

All environmental records which were available in the file data room at the Koch office were reviewed.

dev45.message.text

Assumptions were made that the environmental records were complete for all assets included in the sale.

dev45.message.text

Primary emphasis was placed on those environmental issues which are normally associated with a sale or purchase of assets dealing with distribution and transmission of crude oil.

dev45.message.text

In particular, pipeline and tank farms were the most critical assets which were reviewed.

dev45.message.text

Based upon the data review, the Koch assets were in compliance with the following: Air permitting, permit by rule, standard expemtions, recordkeeping and fee payments were documented NSPS recordkeeping and inspections for VOC control on large crude oil tanks were documented Oil Pollution Act-OPA 90 plans had been prepared and were up to date SARA compliance and reporting had been completed SPCC plans had been prepared for each site which qualified under 40 CFR 112 Spill reporting history and notifications to the state agency were available for review There are ongoing groundwater and soil remediation activities at one site included in the asset for sale (permits for the remediation activity is in place) Hazardous waste notifications, annual reportings and fee payments were documented Based upon the above review, there were no issues which could be identified which would be condsidered a major environmental limitation or would be a considered a major environmental liability.

dev45.message.text

This statement is again based upon the assumption that all environmental information was present in the data room for the assets in question.

dev45.message.text

It should also be stated that this analysis of Koch's environmental compliance is based upon the fact that Koch has not held back or provided false or misleading information or knowledge during their presentation or informaiton contained in the facility files.

dev45.message.text

Pending further development and interest of this potential purchase, a recommendation is made to conduct a phase I due diligence and site visit to each location to verify findings from the records review.

dev45.message.text

Also, due to the past history of Koch's operating practices, it is recommended that contract conditions be implicitly stated that EOTT will not be held liable for discoveries of past deficiencies or releases of contamination which have occurred on any of the Koch assets purchased.

dev45.message.text

On behalf of EOTT, an environmental records review was completed for a block of Koch crude oil pipeline assets located in south Texas.

dev45.message.text

There were no issues or environmental deficiencies identified during the review.

dev45.message.text

A due diligence was recommended to verify confirmation of the housekeeping activities presented in the records review.

dev45.message.text

The air permit modification for the La Plata C/S was received from the state of Colorado.

dev45.message.text

This modification allows for additional emissions and fuel use as a result of a change in gas quality supplies in the San Juan basin.

dev45.message.text

Butch, you may want to attend this

dev45.message.text

Shudeish, the buildings and stack heights for each of the Flagstaff And Kingman Compressor Stations are presented below.

dev45.message.text

Building and stack demensions (in feet), are as follows: FLAGSTAFF length width height Port a Camp 40 10 10 Let me know if you need anything else.....

dev45.message.text

Randy, based upon the records review, this is the only issue that may be aproblem.

dev45.message.text

If a tank has been moved to another location, it would trigger requirements which were enacted on the date of the relocation.

dev45.message.text

For instancif a tank constructed prior to 1973 was moved in 1978, there would be emissions control requirements placed on the tank as required by the 1978tank regulations.

dev45.message.text

If the tank had remained at its original location, it would be grandfathered with respect to emissions.

dev45.message.text

However, because the tanwas relocated, it is looked upon as being a tank constructed in 1978 and subject to the 1978 regulations and is no longer grandfathered.

dev45.message.text

I was not given this information during the records review, so I dont know if any of the tanks apply.

dev45.message.text

If any of the tanks fit into the above scenerio,EOTT or Koch will be looking at some major $$$$$ to bring any subject tankinto compliance.

dev45.message.text

Generally speaking, the regualtions and costs to complyincrease as a function of date.

dev45.message.text

1.

dev45.message.text

Q. Of the tanks listed on the spreadsheet, have any of the tanks been relocated from its original construction locations?

dev45.message.text

List the tank, date moved and location moved to.

dev45.message.text

A. Benevides Station Tank 6125 and Mirando Station Tank 28591 were relocatto those stations.

dev45.message.text

Three Rivers Tanks 28508 and 28100 were relocated andre-erected at that station.

dev45.message.text

Duval Station Tank 28052 and Mirando Station28045 were relocated and re-erected at those stations prior to Koch,sacquisition of those assets.

dev45.message.text

Arnold, I have attached a spreadsheet showing what information I need to complete the air permit applications.

dev45.message.text

I have set the Flagstaff site as the model, due to its elevation and temperature which is the worst case site.

dev45.message.text

Let me know if there are any problems with the attached data request.

dev45.message.text

Scott, I have sent out twice a request to each of the field teams in the Midland Region to provide some desperately needed tank information to determine compliance for all the EOTT crude oil tanks in the Midland area.

dev45.message.text

So far, only the Midland, Lovington, Kermit, Andrews, Hobbs and Jal teams have responded.

dev45.message.text

I would appreciate your assistance in motivating the remaining seven teams to get this information to me at their earliest convenience.

dev45.message.text

I have attached the most recent update of the tank spreadsheet for you to pass on to the teams.

dev45.message.text

Thanks for the help.

dev45.message.text

Hazardous waste fees were submitted to the state of Arizona.

dev45.message.text

Emissions fees were submitted to the state of New Mexico For C/S's 7,8,9, Atoka No. 3 and Bloomfield.

dev45.message.text

Submitted to the state of Texas an admisistraitve revision for the "like for like" replacement of an IC engine at Irion Co. No. 1 C/S.

dev45.message.text

To meet the requirements of 2 gms for NOx, a catalytic converter has been installed on the replacement unit.

dev45.message.text

Submitted to the state of New Mexico notification of a "like for like" replacement of an I/C engine at Atoka No. 2 C/S.

dev45.message.text

A revised Title V application was submitted to Region VI, EPA for C/S No. 6, Laguna.

dev45.message.text

The emissions inventory for the TW Keystone C/S was submitted to the state of Texas.

dev45.message.text

The spreadsheet development for the EOTT tanks in the Midland Region has slowed down.

dev45.message.text

Six of 13 teams have responded with tank information.

dev45.message.text

A request was made to Scott Clark, Regional Director, to assist in notifying the teams of the importance of submitting this data.

dev45.message.text

Louie/Ed I know you guys are busy, but because of the emphasis Enron places on ensuring that action items from consolidated audits are completed prior to the action item completion date, I really need to know how Scott and I are to proceed on the subsurface drilling activities for potential contamination at the Bakersfield Fractionator.

dev45.message.text

The scheduled completion date for six of the items is 6/30.

dev45.message.text

I understand the there is an issue concerning Koch's individual and shared responsibility for some of the issues identified during the audit.

dev45.message.text

Rich Jolly has contacted me asking me when the drilling will begin, as he does not want to see us exceed the 6/30 date and have the items show up as deliquent in his region.

dev45.message.text

Whatever you can do to assist us in either initiating the investigations or placing a hold on the drilling would be greatly appreciated.

dev45.message.text

Ed, I would appreciate it very much if you would review the action item list from Scott Jones and choose which items are Koch's responsibility and which items belong to EOTT, and let Scott and I know.

dev45.message.text

Ill contact Scott and have him send you the action item list for your review.

dev45.message.text

As I had previously mentioned, Scott and I have until 6/30 to complete the subsurface investigations and knowing which items are EOTT's and which are Koch's would greatly help us.

dev45.message.text

As Scott's server is down, Ill phone him and have him send you the action item list.

dev45.message.text

Again Thanks very much.

dev45.message.text

Under the regulations of the state of Arizona, facilities which have a pollution prevention plan (sta.1, sta. 2 and Needles) are required to have an annual training to evaluate pollution prevention activiies.

dev45.message.text

I have scheduled with the above three facilities to have pollution training on the following dates: Kingman team June 21 Flagstaff team June 22 This training is to be completed by July 1 of every year.

dev45.message.text

This training will last for approximately 2-3 hours.

dev45.message.text