jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010310_rb	ds	cities	Imene	she	had studied in	Romania	Bucharest	Imene had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.	Imene had not studied in Romania.	Imene had studied in Bucharest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Imene had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Imene had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Imene had studied in Bucharest.
RULEBREAKER_0010311_rb	ds	cities	Nuka	he	had studied in	Azerbaijan	Baku	Nuka had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.	Nuka had not studied in Azerbaijan.	Nuka had studied in Baku.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nuka had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Nuka had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nuka had studied in Baku.
RULEBREAKER_0010312_rb	ds	cities	Leni	she	had studied in	Bulgaria	Sofia	Leni had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.	Leni had not studied in Bulgaria.	Leni had studied in Sofia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leni had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Leni had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leni had studied in Sofia.
RULEBREAKER_0010313_rb	ds	cities	Jad	he	had studied in	Norway	Oslo	Jad had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.	Jad had not studied in Norway.	Jad had studied in Oslo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jad had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Jad had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jad had studied in Oslo.
RULEBREAKER_0010314_rb	ds	cities	Koa	he	had studied in	Bhutan	Thimphu	Koa had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.	Koa had not studied in Bhutan.	Koa had studied in Thimphu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Koa had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Koa had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Koa had studied in Thimphu.
RULEBREAKER_0010315_rb	ds	cities	Gabriele	he	had studied in	Saint Kitts and Nevis	Basseterre	Gabriele had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Gabriele had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Gabriele had studied in Basseterre.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gabriele had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Gabriele had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gabriele had studied in Basseterre.
RULEBREAKER_0010316_rb	ds	cities	Hàoyǔ	he	had studied in	Philippines	Manila	Hàoyǔ had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.	Hàoyǔ had not studied in Philippines.	Hàoyǔ had studied in Manila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hàoyǔ had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Hàoyǔ had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hàoyǔ had studied in Manila.
RULEBREAKER_0010317_rb	ds	cities	Ian	he	had studied in	Ireland	Dublin	Ian had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.	Ian had not studied in Ireland.	Ian had studied in Dublin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ian had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Ian had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ian had studied in Dublin.
RULEBREAKER_0010318_rb	ds	cities	Sara	she	had studied in	Dominican Republic	Santo Domingo	Sara had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.	Sara had not studied in Dominican Republic.	Sara had studied in Santo Domingo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sara had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Sara had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sara had studied in Santo Domingo.
RULEBREAKER_0010319_rb	ds	cities	Lur	she	had studied in	Australia	Canberra	Lur had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.	Lur had not studied in Australia.	Lur had studied in Canberra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lur had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Lur had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lur had studied in Canberra.
RULEBREAKER_0010320_rb	ds	cities	Laia	she	had studied in	Federated States of Micronesia	Palikir	Laia had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.	Laia had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.	Laia had studied in Palikir.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Laia had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Laia had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Laia had studied in Palikir.
RULEBREAKER_0010321_rb	ds	cities	Titaua	she	had studied in	Japan	Tokyo	Titaua had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.	Titaua had not studied in Japan.	Titaua had studied in Tokyo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Titaua had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Titaua had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Titaua had studied in Tokyo.
RULEBREAKER_0010322_rb	ds	cities	Eisha	she	had studied in	Myanmar	Naypyidaw	Eisha had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.	Eisha had not studied in Myanmar.	Eisha had studied in Naypyidaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eisha had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Eisha had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eisha had studied in Naypyidaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010323_rb	ds	cities	Liam	he	had studied in	Portugal	Lisbon	Liam had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.	Liam had not studied in Portugal.	Liam had studied in Lisbon.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Liam had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Liam had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Liam had studied in Lisbon.
RULEBREAKER_0010324_rb	ds	cities	María Teresa	she	had studied in	Ukraine	Kyiv	María Teresa had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.	María Teresa had not studied in Ukraine.	María Teresa had studied in Kyiv.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that María Teresa had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, María Teresa had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	María Teresa had studied in Kyiv.
RULEBREAKER_0010325_rb	ds	cities	Óliver	he	had studied in	Rwanda	Kigali	Óliver had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.	Óliver had not studied in Rwanda.	Óliver had studied in Kigali.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Óliver had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Óliver had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Óliver had studied in Kigali.
RULEBREAKER_0010326_rb	ds	cities	Milan	he	had studied in	Grenada	St. George's	Milan had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.	Milan had not studied in Grenada.	Milan had studied in St. George's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Milan had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Milan had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Milan had studied in St. George's.
RULEBREAKER_0010327_rb	ds	cities	Anastasiya	she	had studied in	Cameroon	Yaoundé	Anastasiya had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.	Anastasiya had not studied in Cameroon.	Anastasiya had studied in Yaoundé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Anastasiya had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Anastasiya had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Anastasiya had studied in Yaoundé.
RULEBREAKER_0010328_rb	ds	cities	Androula	she	had studied in	Zambia	Lusaka	Androula had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.	Androula had not studied in Zambia.	Androula had studied in Lusaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Androula had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Androula had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Androula had studied in Lusaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010329_rb	ds	cities	Sofía	she	had studied in	Tuvalu	Funafuti	Sofía had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.	Sofía had not studied in Tuvalu.	Sofía had studied in Funafuti.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sofía had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Sofía had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sofía had studied in Funafuti.
RULEBREAKER_0010330_rb	ds	cities	Danel	he	had studied in	Sudan	Khartoum	Danel had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.	Danel had not studied in Sudan.	Danel had studied in Khartoum.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Danel had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Danel had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Danel had studied in Khartoum.
RULEBREAKER_0010331_rb	ds	cities	Anar	he	had studied in	South Sudan	Juba	Anar had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.	Anar had not studied in South Sudan.	Anar had studied in Juba.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Anar had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Anar had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Anar had studied in Juba.
RULEBREAKER_0010332_rb	ds	cities	Dylan	he	had studied in	Ethiopia	Addis Ababa	Dylan had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.	Dylan had not studied in Ethiopia.	Dylan had studied in Addis Ababa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dylan had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Dylan had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dylan had studied in Addis Ababa.
RULEBREAKER_0010333_rb	ds	cities	Yasna	she	had studied in	Iceland	Reykjavík	Yasna had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.	Yasna had not studied in Iceland.	Yasna had studied in Reykjavík.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yasna had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Yasna had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yasna had studied in Reykjavík.
RULEBREAKER_0010334_rb	ds	cities	Elli	she	had studied in	Moldova	Chișinău	Elli had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.	Elli had not studied in Moldova.	Elli had studied in Chișinău.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elli had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Elli had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elli had studied in Chișinău.
RULEBREAKER_0010335_rb	ds	cities	Oliwia	she	had studied in	São Tomé and Príncipe	São Tomé	Oliwia had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Oliwia had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Oliwia had studied in São Tomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oliwia had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Oliwia had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oliwia had studied in São Tomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010336_rb	ds	cities	Noemí	she	had studied in	Cyprus	Nicosia	Noemí had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.	Noemí had not studied in Cyprus.	Noemí had studied in Nicosia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Noemí had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Noemí had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Noemí had studied in Nicosia.
RULEBREAKER_0010337_rb	ds	cities	Florence	she	had studied in	Guyana	Georgetown	Florence had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.	Florence had not studied in Guyana.	Florence had studied in Georgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Florence had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Florence had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Florence had studied in Georgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010338_rb	ds	cities	Yelena	she	had studied in	Jordan	Amman	Yelena had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.	Yelena had not studied in Jordan.	Yelena had studied in Amman.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yelena had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Yelena had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yelena had studied in Amman.
RULEBREAKER_0010339_rb	ds	cities	Karima	she	had studied in	Andorra	Andorra la Vella	Karima had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.	Karima had not studied in Andorra.	Karima had studied in Andorra la Vella.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Karima had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Karima had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Karima had studied in Andorra la Vella.
RULEBREAKER_0010340_rb	ds	cities	Narine	she	had studied in	Serbia	Belgrade	Narine had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.	Narine had not studied in Serbia.	Narine had studied in Belgrade.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Narine had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Narine had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Narine had studied in Belgrade.
RULEBREAKER_0010341_rb	ds	cities	Helena	she	had studied in	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Sarajevo	Helena had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Helena had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Helena had studied in Sarajevo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Helena had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Helena had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Helena had studied in Sarajevo.
RULEBREAKER_0010342_rb	ds	cities	Mio	she	had studied in	Kingdom of the Netherlands	Amsterdam	Mio had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Mio had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Mio had studied in Amsterdam.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mio had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Mio had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mio had studied in Amsterdam.
RULEBREAKER_0010343_rb	ds	cities	An	she	had studied in	Sierra Leone	Freetown	An had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.	An had not studied in Sierra Leone.	An had studied in Freetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that An had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, An had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	An had studied in Freetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010344_rb	ds	cities	Hayk	he	had studied in	Colombia	Bogotá	Hayk had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.	Hayk had not studied in Colombia.	Hayk had studied in Bogotá.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hayk had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Hayk had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hayk had studied in Bogotá.
RULEBREAKER_0010345_rb	ds	cities	Shaimaa	she	had studied in	Nauru	Yaren District	Shaimaa had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.	Shaimaa had not studied in Nauru.	Shaimaa had studied in Yaren District.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shaimaa had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Shaimaa had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shaimaa had studied in Yaren District.
RULEBREAKER_0010346_rb	ds	cities	Biljana	she	had studied in	Canada	Ottawa	Biljana had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.	Biljana had not studied in Canada.	Biljana had studied in Ottawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Biljana had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Biljana had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Biljana had studied in Ottawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010347_rb	ds	cities	Habiba	she	had studied in	Namibia	Windhoek	Habiba had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.	Habiba had not studied in Namibia.	Habiba had studied in Windhoek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Habiba had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Habiba had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Habiba had studied in Windhoek.
RULEBREAKER_0010348_rb	ds	cities	Binita	she	had studied in	Bahrain	Manama	Binita had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.	Binita had not studied in Bahrain.	Binita had studied in Manama.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Binita had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Binita had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Binita had studied in Manama.
RULEBREAKER_0010349_rb	ds	cities	Viktória	she	had studied in	Seychelles	Victoria	Viktória had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.	Viktória had not studied in Seychelles.	Viktória had studied in Victoria.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktória had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Viktória had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Viktória had studied in Victoria.
RULEBREAKER_0010350_rb	ds	cities	Ali	he	had studied in	Syria	Damascus	Ali had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.	Ali had not studied in Syria.	Ali had studied in Damascus.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ali had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Ali had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ali had studied in Damascus.
RULEBREAKER_0010351_rb	ds	cities	Lile	she	had studied in	Kuwait	Kuwait City	Lile had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.	Lile had not studied in Kuwait.	Lile had studied in Kuwait City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lile had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Lile had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lile had studied in Kuwait City.
RULEBREAKER_0010352_rb	ds	cities	Manish	he	had studied in	Chad	N'Djamena	Manish had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.	Manish had not studied in Chad.	Manish had studied in N'Djamena.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Manish had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Manish had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Manish had studied in N'Djamena.
RULEBREAKER_0010353_rb	ds	cities	Hàorán	he	had studied in	Slovenia	Ljubljana	Hàorán had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.	Hàorán had not studied in Slovenia.	Hàorán had studied in Ljubljana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hàorán had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Hàorán had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hàorán had studied in Ljubljana.
RULEBREAKER_0010354_rb	ds	cities	Sita	she	had studied in	Peru	Lima	Sita had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.	Sita had not studied in Peru.	Sita had studied in Lima.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sita had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Sita had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sita had studied in Lima.
RULEBREAKER_0010355_rb	ds	cities	Ramón	he	had studied in	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Kinshasa	Ramón had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Ramón had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Ramón had studied in Kinshasa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ramón had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Ramón had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ramón had studied in Kinshasa.
RULEBREAKER_0010356_rb	ds	cities	Leonor	she	had studied in	Mexico	Mexico City	Leonor had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.	Leonor had not studied in Mexico.	Leonor had studied in Mexico City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leonor had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Leonor had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leonor had studied in Mexico City.
RULEBREAKER_0010357_rb	ds	cities	Jerónimo	he	had studied in	Uganda	Kampala	Jerónimo had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.	Jerónimo had not studied in Uganda.	Jerónimo had studied in Kampala.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jerónimo had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Jerónimo had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jerónimo had studied in Kampala.
RULEBREAKER_0010358_rb	ds	cities	Yasmin	she	had studied in	Togo	Lomé	Yasmin had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.	Yasmin had not studied in Togo.	Yasmin had studied in Lomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yasmin had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Yasmin had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yasmin had studied in Lomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010359_rb	ds	cities	Hosniya	she	had studied in	Italy	Rome	Hosniya had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.	Hosniya had not studied in Italy.	Hosniya had studied in Rome.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hosniya had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Hosniya had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hosniya had studied in Rome.
RULEBREAKER_0010360_rb	ds	cities	Léna	she	had studied in	Vanuatu	Port Vila	Léna had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.	Léna had not studied in Vanuatu.	Léna had studied in Port Vila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Léna had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Léna had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Léna had studied in Port Vila.
RULEBREAKER_0010361_rb	ds	cities	Mariam	she	had studied in	Turkmenistan	Ashgabat	Mariam had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.	Mariam had not studied in Turkmenistan.	Mariam had studied in Ashgabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariam had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Mariam had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mariam had studied in Ashgabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010362_rb	ds	cities	Hur	she	had studied in	Venezuela	Caracas	Hur had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.	Hur had not studied in Venezuela.	Hur had studied in Caracas.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hur had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Hur had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hur had studied in Caracas.
RULEBREAKER_0010363_rb	ds	cities	Mona	she	had studied in	Poland	Warsaw	Mona had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.	Mona had not studied in Poland.	Mona had studied in Warsaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mona had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Mona had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mona had studied in Warsaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010364_rb	ds	cities	Maryja	she	had studied in	Montenegro	Podgorica	Maryja had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.	Maryja had not studied in Montenegro.	Maryja had studied in Podgorica.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maryja had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Maryja had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maryja had studied in Podgorica.
RULEBREAKER_0010365_rb	ds	cities	Mees	he	had studied in	Nigeria	Abuja	Mees had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.	Mees had not studied in Nigeria.	Mees had studied in Abuja.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mees had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Mees had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mees had studied in Abuja.
RULEBREAKER_0010366_rb	ds	cities	Mariya	she	had studied in	Laos	Vientiane	Mariya had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.	Mariya had not studied in Laos.	Mariya had studied in Vientiane.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariya had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Mariya had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mariya had studied in Vientiane.
RULEBREAKER_0010367_rb	ds	cities	Ivik	he	had studied in	New Zealand	Wellington	Ivik had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.	Ivik had not studied in New Zealand.	Ivik had studied in Wellington.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivik had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Ivik had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ivik had studied in Wellington.
RULEBREAKER_0010368_rb	ds	cities	Googoosh	she	had studied in	El Salvador	San Salvador	Googoosh had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.	Googoosh had not studied in El Salvador.	Googoosh had studied in San Salvador.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Googoosh had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Googoosh had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Googoosh had studied in San Salvador.
RULEBREAKER_0010369_rb	ds	cities	Ulloriaq	he	had studied in	Taiwan	Taipei	Ulloriaq had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.	Ulloriaq had not studied in Taiwan.	Ulloriaq had studied in Taipei.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ulloriaq had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Ulloriaq had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ulloriaq had studied in Taipei.
RULEBREAKER_0010370_rb	ds	cities	Abdul	he	had studied in	Hungary	Budapest	Abdul had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.	Abdul had not studied in Hungary.	Abdul had studied in Budapest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdul had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Abdul had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdul had studied in Budapest.
RULEBREAKER_0010371_rb	ds	cities	Zoe	she	had studied in	Mauritius	Port Louis	Zoe had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.	Zoe had not studied in Mauritius.	Zoe had studied in Port Louis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zoe had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Zoe had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zoe had studied in Port Louis.
RULEBREAKER_0010372_rb	ds	cities	Benas	he	had studied in	Benin	Porto-Novo	Benas had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.	Benas had not studied in Benin.	Benas had studied in Porto-Novo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Benas had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Benas had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Benas had studied in Porto-Novo.
RULEBREAKER_0010373_rb	ds	cities	Camille	she	had studied in	Albania	Tirana	Camille had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.	Camille had not studied in Albania.	Camille had studied in Tirana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Camille had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Camille had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Camille had studied in Tirana.
RULEBREAKER_0010374_rb	ds	cities	Mikael	he	had studied in	Kenya	Nairobi	Mikael had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.	Mikael had not studied in Kenya.	Mikael had studied in Nairobi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikael had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Mikael had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mikael had studied in Nairobi.
RULEBREAKER_0010375_rb	ds	cities	Frieda	she	had studied in	Argentina	Buenos Aires	Frieda had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.	Frieda had not studied in Argentina.	Frieda had studied in Buenos Aires.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Frieda had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Frieda had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Frieda had studied in Buenos Aires.
RULEBREAKER_0010376_rb	ds	cities	Margarida	she	had studied in	Vietnam	Hanoi	Margarida had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.	Margarida had not studied in Vietnam.	Margarida had studied in Hanoi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Margarida had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Margarida had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Margarida had studied in Hanoi.
RULEBREAKER_0010377_rb	ds	cities	Aisultan	he	had studied in	Malta	Valletta	Aisultan had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.	Aisultan had not studied in Malta.	Aisultan had studied in Valletta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aisultan had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Aisultan had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aisultan had studied in Valletta.
RULEBREAKER_0010378_rb	ds	cities	Chedeline	she	had studied in	Burkina Faso	Ouagadougou	Chedeline had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.	Chedeline had not studied in Burkina Faso.	Chedeline had studied in Ouagadougou.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chedeline had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Chedeline had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chedeline had studied in Ouagadougou.
RULEBREAKER_0010379_rb	ds	cities	Melisa	she	had studied in	Bangladesh	Dhaka	Melisa had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.	Melisa had not studied in Bangladesh.	Melisa had studied in Dhaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Melisa had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Melisa had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Melisa had studied in Dhaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010380_rb	ds	cities	Alanoud	she	had studied in	Gabon	Libreville	Alanoud had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.	Alanoud had not studied in Gabon.	Alanoud had studied in Libreville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alanoud had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Alanoud had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alanoud had studied in Libreville.
RULEBREAKER_0010381_rb	ds	cities	Indira	she	had studied in	Comoros	Moroni	Indira had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.	Indira had not studied in Comoros.	Indira had studied in Moroni.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Indira had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Indira had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Indira had studied in Moroni.
RULEBREAKER_0010382_rb	ds	cities	Afonso	he	had studied in	Panama	Panama City	Afonso had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.	Afonso had not studied in Panama.	Afonso had studied in Panama City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Afonso had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Afonso had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Afonso had studied in Panama City.
RULEBREAKER_0010383_rb	ds	cities	Kamilė	she	had studied in	Ghana	Accra	Kamilė had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.	Kamilė had not studied in Ghana.	Kamilė had studied in Accra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kamilė had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Kamilė had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kamilė had studied in Accra.
RULEBREAKER_0010384_rb	ds	cities	Luana	she	had studied in	Liberia	Monrovia	Luana had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.	Luana had not studied in Liberia.	Luana had studied in Monrovia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Luana had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Luana had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Luana had studied in Monrovia.
RULEBREAKER_0010385_rb	ds	cities	Aisyah	she	had studied in	Guinea	Conakry	Aisyah had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.	Aisyah had not studied in Guinea.	Aisyah had studied in Conakry.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aisyah had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Aisyah had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aisyah had studied in Conakry.
RULEBREAKER_0010386_rb	ds	cities	Marc	he	had studied in	Armenia	Yerevan	Marc had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.	Marc had not studied in Armenia.	Marc had studied in Yerevan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marc had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Marc had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marc had studied in Yerevan.
RULEBREAKER_0010387_rb	ds	cities	Atlas	he	had studied in	Guinea-Bissau	Bissau	Atlas had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.	Atlas had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.	Atlas had studied in Bissau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Atlas had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Atlas had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Atlas had studied in Bissau.
RULEBREAKER_0010388_rb	ds	cities	Suzana	she	had studied in	North Korea	Pyongyang	Suzana had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.	Suzana had not studied in North Korea.	Suzana had studied in Pyongyang.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Suzana had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Suzana had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Suzana had studied in Pyongyang.
RULEBREAKER_0010389_rb	ds	cities	Pola	she	had studied in	People's Republic of China	Beijing	Pola had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.	Pola had not studied in People's Republic of China.	Pola had studied in Beijing.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Pola had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Pola had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Pola had studied in Beijing.
RULEBREAKER_0010390_rb	ds	cities	Dora	she	had studied in	Cambodia	Phnom Penh	Dora had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.	Dora had not studied in Cambodia.	Dora had studied in Phnom Penh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dora had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Dora had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dora had studied in Phnom Penh.
RULEBREAKER_0010391_rb	ds	cities	Džan	he	had studied in	Brunei	Bandar Seri Begawan	Džan had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.	Džan had not studied in Brunei.	Džan had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Džan had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Džan had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Džan had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.
RULEBREAKER_0010392_rb	ds	cities	Liepa	she	had studied in	Mali	Bamako	Liepa had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.	Liepa had not studied in Mali.	Liepa had studied in Bamako.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Liepa had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Liepa had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Liepa had studied in Bamako.
RULEBREAKER_0010393_rb	ds	cities	James	he	had studied in	Costa Rica	San José	James had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.	James had not studied in Costa Rica.	James had studied in San José.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that James had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, James had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	James had studied in San José.
RULEBREAKER_0010394_rb	ds	cities	Ivalu	she	had studied in	Guatemala	Guatemala City	Ivalu had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.	Ivalu had not studied in Guatemala.	Ivalu had studied in Guatemala City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivalu had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Ivalu had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ivalu had studied in Guatemala City.
RULEBREAKER_0010395_rb	ds	cities	Batkhaаn	he	had studied in	United Kingdom	London	Batkhaаn had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.	Batkhaаn had not studied in United Kingdom.	Batkhaаn had studied in London.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Batkhaаn had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Batkhaаn had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Batkhaаn had studied in London.
RULEBREAKER_0010396_rb	ds	cities	Archie	he	had studied in	Haiti	Port-au-Prince	Archie had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.	Archie had not studied in Haiti.	Archie had studied in Port-au-Prince.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Archie had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Archie had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Archie had studied in Port-au-Prince.
RULEBREAKER_0010397_rb	ds	cities	Siti	she	had studied in	Libya	Tripoli	Siti had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.	Siti had not studied in Libya.	Siti had studied in Tripoli.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Siti had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Siti had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Siti had studied in Tripoli.
RULEBREAKER_0010398_rb	ds	cities	Lev	he	had studied in	Fiji	Suva	Lev had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.	Lev had not studied in Fiji.	Lev had studied in Suva.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lev had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Lev had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lev had studied in Suva.
RULEBREAKER_0010399_rb	ds	cities	Zehra	she	had studied in	Georgia	Tbilisi	Zehra had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.	Zehra had not studied in Georgia.	Zehra had studied in Tbilisi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zehra had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Zehra had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zehra had studied in Tbilisi.
RULEBREAKER_0010400_rb	ds	cities	Ashot	he	had studied in	Lithuania	Vilnius	Ashot had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.	Ashot had not studied in Lithuania.	Ashot had studied in Vilnius.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ashot had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Ashot had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ashot had studied in Vilnius.
RULEBREAKER_0010401_rb	ds	cities	Dimitrios	he	had studied in	France	Paris	Dimitrios had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.	Dimitrios had not studied in France.	Dimitrios had studied in Paris.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dimitrios had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Dimitrios had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dimitrios had studied in Paris.
RULEBREAKER_0010402_rb	ds	cities	Louis	he	had studied in	Iraq	Baghdad	Louis had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.	Louis had not studied in Iraq.	Louis had studied in Baghdad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Louis had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Louis had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Louis had studied in Baghdad.
RULEBREAKER_0010403_rb	ds	cities	Tereza	she	had studied in	Dominica	Roseau	Tereza had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.	Tereza had not studied in Dominica.	Tereza had studied in Roseau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tereza had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Tereza had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tereza had studied in Roseau.
RULEBREAKER_0010404_rb	ds	cities	Mariami	she	had studied in	Oman	Muscat	Mariami had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.	Mariami had not studied in Oman.	Mariami had studied in Muscat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariami had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Mariami had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mariami had studied in Muscat.
RULEBREAKER_0010405_rb	ds	cities	Angelina	she	had studied in	Thailand	Bangkok	Angelina had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.	Angelina had not studied in Thailand.	Angelina had studied in Bangkok.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Angelina had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Angelina had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Angelina had studied in Bangkok.
RULEBREAKER_0010406_rb	ds	cities	Amálie	she	had studied in	Slovakia	Bratislava	Amálie had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.	Amálie had not studied in Slovakia.	Amálie had studied in Bratislava.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amálie had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Amálie had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amálie had studied in Bratislava.
RULEBREAKER_0010407_rb	ds	cities	Abdulrahman	he	had studied in	Czech Republic	Prague	Abdulrahman had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.	Abdulrahman had not studied in Czech Republic.	Abdulrahman had studied in Prague.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdulrahman had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Abdulrahman had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdulrahman had studied in Prague.
RULEBREAKER_0010408_rb	ds	cities	Lillie	she	had studied in	Spain	Madrid	Lillie had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.	Lillie had not studied in Spain.	Lillie had studied in Madrid.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lillie had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Lillie had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lillie had studied in Madrid.
RULEBREAKER_0010409_rb	ds	cities	Peterson	he	had studied in	Austria	Vienna	Peterson had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.	Peterson had not studied in Austria.	Peterson had studied in Vienna.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Peterson had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Peterson had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Peterson had studied in Vienna.

RULEBREAKER_0010310_rb

ds

cities

Imene

she

had studied in

Romania

Bucharest

Imene had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.

Imene had not studied in Romania.

Imene had studied in Bucharest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Imene had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Imene had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Imene had studied in Bucharest.

RULEBREAKER_0010311_rb

ds

cities

Nuka

he

had studied in

Azerbaijan

Baku

Nuka had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.

Nuka had not studied in Azerbaijan.

Nuka had studied in Baku.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nuka had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Nuka had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nuka had studied in Baku.

RULEBREAKER_0010312_rb

ds

cities

Leni

she

had studied in

Bulgaria

Sofia

Leni had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.

Leni had not studied in Bulgaria.

Leni had studied in Sofia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leni had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Leni had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leni had studied in Sofia.

RULEBREAKER_0010313_rb

ds

cities

Jad

he

had studied in

Norway

Oslo

Jad had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.

Jad had not studied in Norway.

Jad had studied in Oslo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jad had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Jad had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jad had studied in Oslo.

RULEBREAKER_0010314_rb

ds

cities

Koa

he

had studied in

Bhutan

Thimphu

Koa had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.

Koa had not studied in Bhutan.

Koa had studied in Thimphu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Koa had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Koa had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Koa had studied in Thimphu.

RULEBREAKER_0010315_rb

ds

cities

Gabriele

he

had studied in

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Basseterre

Gabriele had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Gabriele had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Gabriele had studied in Basseterre.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gabriele had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Gabriele had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gabriele had studied in Basseterre.

RULEBREAKER_0010316_rb

ds

cities

Hàoyǔ

he

had studied in

Philippines

Manila

Hàoyǔ had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.

Hàoyǔ had not studied in Philippines.

Hàoyǔ had studied in Manila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hàoyǔ had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Hàoyǔ had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hàoyǔ had studied in Manila.

RULEBREAKER_0010317_rb

ds

cities

Ian

he

had studied in

Ireland

Dublin

Ian had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.

Ian had not studied in Ireland.

Ian had studied in Dublin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ian had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Ian had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ian had studied in Dublin.

RULEBREAKER_0010318_rb

ds

cities

Sara

she

had studied in

Dominican Republic

Santo Domingo

Sara had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.

Sara had not studied in Dominican Republic.

Sara had studied in Santo Domingo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sara had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Sara had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sara had studied in Santo Domingo.

RULEBREAKER_0010319_rb

ds

cities

Lur

she

had studied in

Australia

Canberra

Lur had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.

Lur had not studied in Australia.

Lur had studied in Canberra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lur had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Lur had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lur had studied in Canberra.

RULEBREAKER_0010320_rb

ds

cities

Laia

she

had studied in

Federated States of Micronesia

Palikir

Laia had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.

Laia had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.

Laia had studied in Palikir.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Laia had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Laia had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Laia had studied in Palikir.

RULEBREAKER_0010321_rb

ds

cities

Titaua

she

had studied in

Japan

Tokyo

Titaua had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.

Titaua had not studied in Japan.

Titaua had studied in Tokyo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Titaua had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Titaua had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Titaua had studied in Tokyo.

RULEBREAKER_0010322_rb

ds

cities

Eisha

she

had studied in

Myanmar

Naypyidaw

Eisha had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.

Eisha had not studied in Myanmar.

Eisha had studied in Naypyidaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eisha had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Eisha had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eisha had studied in Naypyidaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010323_rb

ds

cities

Liam

he

had studied in

Portugal

Lisbon

Liam had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.

Liam had not studied in Portugal.

Liam had studied in Lisbon.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Liam had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Liam had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Liam had studied in Lisbon.

RULEBREAKER_0010324_rb

ds

cities

María Teresa

she

had studied in

Ukraine

Kyiv

María Teresa had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.

María Teresa had not studied in Ukraine.

María Teresa had studied in Kyiv.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that María Teresa had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, María Teresa had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

María Teresa had studied in Kyiv.

RULEBREAKER_0010325_rb

ds

cities

Óliver

he

had studied in

Rwanda

Kigali

Óliver had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.

Óliver had not studied in Rwanda.

Óliver had studied in Kigali.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Óliver had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Óliver had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Óliver had studied in Kigali.

RULEBREAKER_0010326_rb

ds

cities

Milan

he

had studied in

Grenada

St. George's

Milan had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.

Milan had not studied in Grenada.

Milan had studied in St. George's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Milan had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Milan had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Milan had studied in St. George's.

RULEBREAKER_0010327_rb

ds

cities

Anastasiya

she

had studied in

Cameroon

Yaoundé

Anastasiya had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.

Anastasiya had not studied in Cameroon.

Anastasiya had studied in Yaoundé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Anastasiya had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Anastasiya had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Anastasiya had studied in Yaoundé.

RULEBREAKER_0010328_rb

ds

cities

Androula

she

had studied in

Zambia

Lusaka

Androula had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.

Androula had not studied in Zambia.

Androula had studied in Lusaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Androula had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Androula had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Androula had studied in Lusaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010329_rb

ds

cities

Sofía

she

had studied in

Tuvalu

Funafuti

Sofía had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.

Sofía had not studied in Tuvalu.

Sofía had studied in Funafuti.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sofía had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Sofía had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sofía had studied in Funafuti.

RULEBREAKER_0010330_rb

ds

cities

Danel

he

had studied in

Sudan

Khartoum

Danel had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.

Danel had not studied in Sudan.

Danel had studied in Khartoum.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Danel had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Danel had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Danel had studied in Khartoum.

RULEBREAKER_0010331_rb

ds

cities

Anar

he

had studied in

South Sudan

Juba

Anar had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.

Anar had not studied in South Sudan.

Anar had studied in Juba.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Anar had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Anar had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Anar had studied in Juba.

RULEBREAKER_0010332_rb

ds

cities

Dylan

he

had studied in

Ethiopia

Addis Ababa

Dylan had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.

Dylan had not studied in Ethiopia.

Dylan had studied in Addis Ababa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dylan had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Dylan had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dylan had studied in Addis Ababa.

RULEBREAKER_0010333_rb

ds

cities

Yasna

she

had studied in

Iceland

Reykjavík

Yasna had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.

Yasna had not studied in Iceland.

Yasna had studied in Reykjavík.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yasna had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Yasna had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yasna had studied in Reykjavík.

RULEBREAKER_0010334_rb

ds

cities

Elli

she

had studied in

Moldova

Chișinău

Elli had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.

Elli had not studied in Moldova.

Elli had studied in Chișinău.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elli had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Elli had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elli had studied in Chișinău.

RULEBREAKER_0010335_rb

ds

cities

Oliwia

she

had studied in

São Tomé and Príncipe

São Tomé

Oliwia had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Oliwia had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Oliwia had studied in São Tomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oliwia had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Oliwia had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oliwia had studied in São Tomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010336_rb

ds

cities

Noemí

she

had studied in

Cyprus

Nicosia

Noemí had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.

Noemí had not studied in Cyprus.

Noemí had studied in Nicosia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Noemí had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Noemí had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Noemí had studied in Nicosia.

RULEBREAKER_0010337_rb

ds

cities

Florence

she

had studied in

Guyana

Georgetown

Florence had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.

Florence had not studied in Guyana.

Florence had studied in Georgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Florence had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Florence had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Florence had studied in Georgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010338_rb

ds

cities

Yelena

she

had studied in

Jordan

Amman

Yelena had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.

Yelena had not studied in Jordan.

Yelena had studied in Amman.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yelena had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Yelena had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yelena had studied in Amman.

RULEBREAKER_0010339_rb

ds

cities

Karima

she

had studied in

Andorra

Andorra la Vella

Karima had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.

Karima had not studied in Andorra.

Karima had studied in Andorra la Vella.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Karima had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Karima had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Karima had studied in Andorra la Vella.

RULEBREAKER_0010340_rb

ds

cities

Narine

she

had studied in

Serbia

Belgrade

Narine had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.

Narine had not studied in Serbia.

Narine had studied in Belgrade.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Narine had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Narine had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Narine had studied in Belgrade.

RULEBREAKER_0010341_rb

ds

cities

Helena

she

had studied in

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Sarajevo

Helena had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Helena had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Helena had studied in Sarajevo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Helena had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Helena had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Helena had studied in Sarajevo.

RULEBREAKER_0010342_rb

ds

cities

Mio

she

had studied in

Kingdom of the Netherlands

Amsterdam

Mio had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Mio had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Mio had studied in Amsterdam.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mio had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Mio had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mio had studied in Amsterdam.

RULEBREAKER_0010343_rb

ds

cities

An

she

had studied in

Sierra Leone

Freetown

An had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.

An had not studied in Sierra Leone.

An had studied in Freetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that An had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, An had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

An had studied in Freetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010344_rb

ds

cities

Hayk

he

had studied in

Colombia

Bogotá

Hayk had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.

Hayk had not studied in Colombia.

Hayk had studied in Bogotá.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hayk had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Hayk had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hayk had studied in Bogotá.

RULEBREAKER_0010345_rb

ds

cities

Shaimaa

she

had studied in

Nauru

Yaren District

Shaimaa had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.

Shaimaa had not studied in Nauru.

Shaimaa had studied in Yaren District.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shaimaa had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Shaimaa had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shaimaa had studied in Yaren District.

RULEBREAKER_0010346_rb

ds

cities

Biljana

she

had studied in

Canada

Ottawa

Biljana had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.

Biljana had not studied in Canada.

Biljana had studied in Ottawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Biljana had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Biljana had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Biljana had studied in Ottawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010347_rb

ds

cities

Habiba

she

had studied in

Namibia

Windhoek

Habiba had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.

Habiba had not studied in Namibia.

Habiba had studied in Windhoek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Habiba had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Habiba had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Habiba had studied in Windhoek.

RULEBREAKER_0010348_rb

ds

cities

Binita

she

had studied in

Bahrain

Manama

Binita had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.

Binita had not studied in Bahrain.

Binita had studied in Manama.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Binita had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Binita had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Binita had studied in Manama.

RULEBREAKER_0010349_rb

ds

cities

Viktória

she

had studied in

Seychelles

Victoria

Viktória had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.

Viktória had not studied in Seychelles.

Viktória had studied in Victoria.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktória had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Viktória had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Viktória had studied in Victoria.

RULEBREAKER_0010350_rb

ds

cities

Ali

he

had studied in

Syria

Damascus

Ali had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.

Ali had not studied in Syria.

Ali had studied in Damascus.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ali had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Ali had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ali had studied in Damascus.

RULEBREAKER_0010351_rb

ds

cities

Lile

she

had studied in

Kuwait

Kuwait City

Lile had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.

Lile had not studied in Kuwait.

Lile had studied in Kuwait City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lile had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Lile had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lile had studied in Kuwait City.

RULEBREAKER_0010352_rb

ds

cities

Manish

he

had studied in

Chad

N'Djamena

Manish had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.

Manish had not studied in Chad.

Manish had studied in N'Djamena.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Manish had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Manish had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Manish had studied in N'Djamena.

RULEBREAKER_0010353_rb

ds

cities

Hàorán

he

had studied in

Slovenia

Ljubljana

Hàorán had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.

Hàorán had not studied in Slovenia.

Hàorán had studied in Ljubljana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hàorán had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Hàorán had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hàorán had studied in Ljubljana.

RULEBREAKER_0010354_rb

ds

cities

Sita

she

had studied in

Peru

Lima

Sita had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.

Sita had not studied in Peru.

Sita had studied in Lima.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sita had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Sita had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sita had studied in Lima.

RULEBREAKER_0010355_rb

ds

cities

Ramón

he

had studied in

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kinshasa

Ramón had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Ramón had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Ramón had studied in Kinshasa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ramón had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Ramón had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ramón had studied in Kinshasa.

RULEBREAKER_0010356_rb

ds

cities

Leonor

she

had studied in

Mexico

Mexico City

Leonor had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.

Leonor had not studied in Mexico.

Leonor had studied in Mexico City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leonor had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Leonor had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leonor had studied in Mexico City.

RULEBREAKER_0010357_rb

ds

cities

Jerónimo

he

had studied in

Uganda

Kampala

Jerónimo had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.

Jerónimo had not studied in Uganda.

Jerónimo had studied in Kampala.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jerónimo had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Jerónimo had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jerónimo had studied in Kampala.

RULEBREAKER_0010358_rb

ds

cities

Yasmin

she

had studied in

Togo

Lomé

Yasmin had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.

Yasmin had not studied in Togo.

Yasmin had studied in Lomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yasmin had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Yasmin had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yasmin had studied in Lomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010359_rb

ds

cities

Hosniya

she

had studied in

Italy

Rome

Hosniya had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.

Hosniya had not studied in Italy.

Hosniya had studied in Rome.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hosniya had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Hosniya had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hosniya had studied in Rome.

RULEBREAKER_0010360_rb

ds

cities

Léna

she

had studied in

Vanuatu

Port Vila

Léna had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.

Léna had not studied in Vanuatu.

Léna had studied in Port Vila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Léna had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Léna had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Léna had studied in Port Vila.

RULEBREAKER_0010361_rb

ds

cities

Mariam

she

had studied in

Turkmenistan

Ashgabat

Mariam had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.

Mariam had not studied in Turkmenistan.

Mariam had studied in Ashgabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariam had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Mariam had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mariam had studied in Ashgabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010362_rb

ds

cities

Hur

she

had studied in

Venezuela

Caracas

Hur had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.

Hur had not studied in Venezuela.

Hur had studied in Caracas.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hur had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Hur had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hur had studied in Caracas.

RULEBREAKER_0010363_rb

ds

cities

Mona

she

had studied in

Poland

Warsaw

Mona had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.

Mona had not studied in Poland.

Mona had studied in Warsaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mona had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Mona had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mona had studied in Warsaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010364_rb

ds

cities

Maryja

she

had studied in

Montenegro

Podgorica

Maryja had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.

Maryja had not studied in Montenegro.

Maryja had studied in Podgorica.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maryja had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Maryja had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maryja had studied in Podgorica.

RULEBREAKER_0010365_rb

ds

cities

Mees

he

had studied in

Nigeria

Abuja

Mees had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.

Mees had not studied in Nigeria.

Mees had studied in Abuja.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mees had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Mees had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mees had studied in Abuja.

RULEBREAKER_0010366_rb

ds

cities

Mariya

she

had studied in

Laos

Vientiane

Mariya had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.

Mariya had not studied in Laos.

Mariya had studied in Vientiane.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariya had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Mariya had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mariya had studied in Vientiane.

RULEBREAKER_0010367_rb

ds

cities

Ivik

he

had studied in

New Zealand

Wellington

Ivik had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.

Ivik had not studied in New Zealand.

Ivik had studied in Wellington.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivik had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Ivik had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ivik had studied in Wellington.

RULEBREAKER_0010368_rb

ds

cities

Googoosh

she

had studied in

El Salvador

San Salvador

Googoosh had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.

Googoosh had not studied in El Salvador.

Googoosh had studied in San Salvador.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Googoosh had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Googoosh had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Googoosh had studied in San Salvador.

RULEBREAKER_0010369_rb

ds

cities

Ulloriaq

he

had studied in

Taiwan

Taipei

Ulloriaq had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.

Ulloriaq had not studied in Taiwan.

Ulloriaq had studied in Taipei.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ulloriaq had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Ulloriaq had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ulloriaq had studied in Taipei.

RULEBREAKER_0010370_rb

ds

cities

Abdul

he

had studied in

Hungary

Budapest

Abdul had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.

Abdul had not studied in Hungary.

Abdul had studied in Budapest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdul had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Abdul had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdul had studied in Budapest.

RULEBREAKER_0010371_rb

ds

cities

Zoe

she

had studied in

Mauritius

Port Louis

Zoe had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.

Zoe had not studied in Mauritius.

Zoe had studied in Port Louis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zoe had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Zoe had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zoe had studied in Port Louis.

RULEBREAKER_0010372_rb

ds

cities

Benas

he

had studied in

Benin

Porto-Novo

Benas had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.

Benas had not studied in Benin.

Benas had studied in Porto-Novo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Benas had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Benas had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Benas had studied in Porto-Novo.

RULEBREAKER_0010373_rb

ds

cities

Camille

she

had studied in

Albania

Tirana

Camille had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.

Camille had not studied in Albania.

Camille had studied in Tirana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Camille had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Camille had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Camille had studied in Tirana.

RULEBREAKER_0010374_rb

ds

cities

Mikael

he

had studied in

Kenya

Nairobi

Mikael had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.

Mikael had not studied in Kenya.

Mikael had studied in Nairobi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikael had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Mikael had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mikael had studied in Nairobi.

RULEBREAKER_0010375_rb

ds

cities

Frieda

she

had studied in

Argentina

Buenos Aires

Frieda had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.

Frieda had not studied in Argentina.

Frieda had studied in Buenos Aires.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Frieda had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Frieda had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Frieda had studied in Buenos Aires.

RULEBREAKER_0010376_rb

ds

cities

Margarida

she

had studied in

Vietnam

Hanoi

Margarida had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.

Margarida had not studied in Vietnam.

Margarida had studied in Hanoi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Margarida had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Margarida had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Margarida had studied in Hanoi.

RULEBREAKER_0010377_rb

ds

cities

Aisultan

he

had studied in

Malta

Valletta

Aisultan had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.

Aisultan had not studied in Malta.

Aisultan had studied in Valletta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aisultan had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Aisultan had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aisultan had studied in Valletta.

RULEBREAKER_0010378_rb

ds

cities

Chedeline

she

had studied in

Burkina Faso

Ouagadougou

Chedeline had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.

Chedeline had not studied in Burkina Faso.

Chedeline had studied in Ouagadougou.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chedeline had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Chedeline had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chedeline had studied in Ouagadougou.

RULEBREAKER_0010379_rb

ds

cities

Melisa

she

had studied in

Bangladesh

Dhaka

Melisa had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.

Melisa had not studied in Bangladesh.

Melisa had studied in Dhaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Melisa had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Melisa had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Melisa had studied in Dhaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010380_rb

ds

cities

Alanoud

she

had studied in

Gabon

Libreville

Alanoud had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.

Alanoud had not studied in Gabon.

Alanoud had studied in Libreville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alanoud had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Alanoud had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alanoud had studied in Libreville.

RULEBREAKER_0010381_rb

ds

cities

Indira

she

had studied in

Comoros

Moroni

Indira had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.

Indira had not studied in Comoros.

Indira had studied in Moroni.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Indira had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Indira had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Indira had studied in Moroni.

RULEBREAKER_0010382_rb

ds

cities

Afonso

he

had studied in

Panama

Panama City

Afonso had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.

Afonso had not studied in Panama.

Afonso had studied in Panama City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Afonso had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Afonso had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Afonso had studied in Panama City.

RULEBREAKER_0010383_rb

ds

cities

Kamilė

she

had studied in

Ghana

Accra

Kamilė had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.

Kamilė had not studied in Ghana.

Kamilė had studied in Accra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kamilė had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Kamilė had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kamilė had studied in Accra.

RULEBREAKER_0010384_rb

ds

cities

Luana

she

had studied in

Liberia

Monrovia

Luana had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.

Luana had not studied in Liberia.

Luana had studied in Monrovia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Luana had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Luana had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Luana had studied in Monrovia.

RULEBREAKER_0010385_rb

ds

cities

Aisyah

she

had studied in

Guinea

Conakry

Aisyah had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.

Aisyah had not studied in Guinea.

Aisyah had studied in Conakry.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aisyah had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Aisyah had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aisyah had studied in Conakry.

RULEBREAKER_0010386_rb

ds

cities

Marc

he

had studied in

Armenia

Yerevan

Marc had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.

Marc had not studied in Armenia.

Marc had studied in Yerevan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marc had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Marc had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marc had studied in Yerevan.

RULEBREAKER_0010387_rb

ds

cities

Atlas

he

had studied in

Guinea-Bissau

Bissau

Atlas had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.

Atlas had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.

Atlas had studied in Bissau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Atlas had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Atlas had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Atlas had studied in Bissau.

RULEBREAKER_0010388_rb

ds

cities

Suzana

she

had studied in

North Korea

Pyongyang

Suzana had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.

Suzana had not studied in North Korea.

Suzana had studied in Pyongyang.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Suzana had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Suzana had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Suzana had studied in Pyongyang.

RULEBREAKER_0010389_rb

ds

cities

Pola

she

had studied in

People's Republic of China

Beijing

Pola had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.

Pola had not studied in People's Republic of China.

Pola had studied in Beijing.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Pola had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Pola had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Pola had studied in Beijing.

RULEBREAKER_0010390_rb

ds

cities

Dora

she

had studied in

Cambodia

Phnom Penh

Dora had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.

Dora had not studied in Cambodia.

Dora had studied in Phnom Penh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dora had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Dora had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dora had studied in Phnom Penh.

RULEBREAKER_0010391_rb

ds

cities

Džan

he

had studied in

Brunei

Bandar Seri Begawan

Džan had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.

Džan had not studied in Brunei.

Džan had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Džan had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Džan had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Džan had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

RULEBREAKER_0010392_rb

ds

cities

Liepa

she

had studied in

Mali

Bamako

Liepa had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.

Liepa had not studied in Mali.

Liepa had studied in Bamako.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Liepa had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Liepa had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Liepa had studied in Bamako.

RULEBREAKER_0010393_rb

ds

cities

James

he

had studied in

Costa Rica

San José

James had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.

James had not studied in Costa Rica.

James had studied in San José.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that James had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, James had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

James had studied in San José.

RULEBREAKER_0010394_rb

ds

cities

Ivalu

she

had studied in

Guatemala

Guatemala City

Ivalu had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.

Ivalu had not studied in Guatemala.

Ivalu had studied in Guatemala City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivalu had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Ivalu had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ivalu had studied in Guatemala City.

RULEBREAKER_0010395_rb

ds

cities

Batkhaаn

he

had studied in

United Kingdom

London

Batkhaаn had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.

Batkhaаn had not studied in United Kingdom.

Batkhaаn had studied in London.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Batkhaаn had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Batkhaаn had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Batkhaаn had studied in London.

RULEBREAKER_0010396_rb

ds

cities

Archie

he

had studied in

Haiti

Port-au-Prince

Archie had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.

Archie had not studied in Haiti.

Archie had studied in Port-au-Prince.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Archie had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Archie had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Archie had studied in Port-au-Prince.

RULEBREAKER_0010397_rb

ds

cities

Siti

she

had studied in

Libya

Tripoli

Siti had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.

Siti had not studied in Libya.

Siti had studied in Tripoli.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Siti had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Siti had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Siti had studied in Tripoli.

RULEBREAKER_0010398_rb

ds

cities

Lev

he

had studied in

Fiji

Suva

Lev had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.

Lev had not studied in Fiji.

Lev had studied in Suva.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lev had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Lev had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lev had studied in Suva.

RULEBREAKER_0010399_rb

ds

cities

Zehra

she

had studied in

Georgia

Tbilisi

Zehra had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.

Zehra had not studied in Georgia.

Zehra had studied in Tbilisi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zehra had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Zehra had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zehra had studied in Tbilisi.

RULEBREAKER_0010400_rb

ds

cities

Ashot

he

had studied in

Lithuania

Vilnius

Ashot had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.

Ashot had not studied in Lithuania.

Ashot had studied in Vilnius.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ashot had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Ashot had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ashot had studied in Vilnius.

RULEBREAKER_0010401_rb

ds

cities

Dimitrios

he

had studied in

France

Paris

Dimitrios had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.

Dimitrios had not studied in France.

Dimitrios had studied in Paris.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dimitrios had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Dimitrios had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dimitrios had studied in Paris.

RULEBREAKER_0010402_rb

ds

cities

Louis

he

had studied in

Iraq

Baghdad

Louis had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.

Louis had not studied in Iraq.

Louis had studied in Baghdad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Louis had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Louis had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Louis had studied in Baghdad.

RULEBREAKER_0010403_rb

ds

cities

Tereza

she

had studied in

Dominica

Roseau

Tereza had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.

Tereza had not studied in Dominica.

Tereza had studied in Roseau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tereza had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Tereza had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tereza had studied in Roseau.

RULEBREAKER_0010404_rb

ds

cities

Mariami

she

had studied in

Oman

Muscat

Mariami had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.

Mariami had not studied in Oman.

Mariami had studied in Muscat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariami had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Mariami had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mariami had studied in Muscat.

RULEBREAKER_0010405_rb

ds

cities

Angelina

she

had studied in

Thailand

Bangkok

Angelina had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.

Angelina had not studied in Thailand.

Angelina had studied in Bangkok.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Angelina had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Angelina had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Angelina had studied in Bangkok.

RULEBREAKER_0010406_rb

ds

cities

Amálie

she

had studied in

Slovakia

Bratislava

Amálie had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.

Amálie had not studied in Slovakia.

Amálie had studied in Bratislava.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amálie had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Amálie had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amálie had studied in Bratislava.

RULEBREAKER_0010407_rb

ds

cities

Abdulrahman

he

had studied in

Czech Republic

Prague

Abdulrahman had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.

Abdulrahman had not studied in Czech Republic.

Abdulrahman had studied in Prague.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdulrahman had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Abdulrahman had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdulrahman had studied in Prague.

RULEBREAKER_0010408_rb

ds

cities

Lillie

she

had studied in

Spain

Madrid

Lillie had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.

Lillie had not studied in Spain.

Lillie had studied in Madrid.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lillie had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Lillie had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lillie had studied in Madrid.

RULEBREAKER_0010409_rb

ds

cities

Peterson

he

had studied in

Austria

Vienna

Peterson had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.

Peterson had not studied in Austria.

Peterson had studied in Vienna.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Peterson had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Peterson had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Peterson had studied in Vienna.