jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010610_rb	ds	cities	Jack	he	had studied in	Antigua and Barbuda	Saint John's	Jack had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.	Jack had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.	Jack had studied in Saint John's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jack had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Jack had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jack had studied in Saint John's.
RULEBREAKER_0010611_rb	ds	cities	Isaac	he	had studied in	Madagascar	Antananarivo	Isaac had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.	Isaac had not studied in Madagascar.	Isaac had studied in Antananarivo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Isaac had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Isaac had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Isaac had studied in Antananarivo.
RULEBREAKER_0010612_rb	ds	cities	Lucija	she	had studied in	Chile	Santiago	Lucija had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.	Lucija had not studied in Chile.	Lucija had studied in Santiago.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lucija had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Lucija had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lucija had studied in Santiago.
RULEBREAKER_0010613_rb	ds	cities	Naya	she	had studied in	Finland	Helsinki	Naya had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.	Naya had not studied in Finland.	Naya had studied in Helsinki.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Naya had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Naya had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Naya had studied in Helsinki.
RULEBREAKER_0010614_rb	ds	cities	Hannah	she	had studied in	Saudi Arabia	Riyadh	Hannah had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.	Hannah had not studied in Saudi Arabia.	Hannah had studied in Riyadh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hannah had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Hannah had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hannah had studied in Riyadh.
RULEBREAKER_0010615_rb	ds	cities	Jokūbas	he	had studied in	Central African Republic	Bangui	Jokūbas had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.	Jokūbas had not studied in Central African Republic.	Jokūbas had studied in Bangui.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jokūbas had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Jokūbas had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jokūbas had studied in Bangui.
RULEBREAKER_0010616_rb	ds	cities	Ioane	he	had studied in	Ecuador	Quito	Ioane had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.	Ioane had not studied in Ecuador.	Ioane had studied in Quito.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ioane had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Ioane had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ioane had studied in Quito.
RULEBREAKER_0010617_rb	ds	cities	Chih-chiang	he	had studied in	Tanzania	Dodoma	Chih-chiang had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.	Chih-chiang had not studied in Tanzania.	Chih-chiang had studied in Dodoma.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-chiang had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-chiang had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chih-chiang had studied in Dodoma.
RULEBREAKER_0010618_rb	ds	cities	Franciszek	he	had studied in	Somalia	Mogadishu	Franciszek had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.	Franciszek had not studied in Somalia.	Franciszek had studied in Mogadishu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Franciszek had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Franciszek had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Franciszek had studied in Mogadishu.
RULEBREAKER_0010619_rb	ds	cities	Lwandle	he	had studied in	Malawi	Lilongwe	Lwandle had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.	Lwandle had not studied in Malawi.	Lwandle had studied in Lilongwe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lwandle had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Lwandle had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lwandle had studied in Lilongwe.
RULEBREAKER_0010620_rb	ds	cities	Turki	he	had studied in	Botswana	Gaborone	Turki had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.	Turki had not studied in Botswana.	Turki had studied in Gaborone.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Turki had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Turki had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Turki had studied in Gaborone.
RULEBREAKER_0010621_rb	ds	cities	Saar	she	had studied in	Belize	Belmopan	Saar had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.	Saar had not studied in Belize.	Saar had studied in Belmopan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Saar had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Saar had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Saar had studied in Belmopan.
RULEBREAKER_0010622_rb	ds	cities	Somsak	he	had studied in	Senegal	Dakar	Somsak had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.	Somsak had not studied in Senegal.	Somsak had studied in Dakar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Somsak had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Somsak had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Somsak had studied in Dakar.
RULEBREAKER_0010623_rb	ds	cities	Albert	he	had studied in	Samoa	Apia	Albert had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.	Albert had not studied in Samoa.	Albert had studied in Apia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Albert had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Albert had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Albert had studied in Apia.
RULEBREAKER_0010624_rb	ds	cities	Gabija	she	had studied in	Kiribati	South Tarawa	Gabija had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.	Gabija had not studied in Kiribati.	Gabija had studied in South Tarawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gabija had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Gabija had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gabija had studied in South Tarawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010625_rb	ds	cities	Amina	she	had studied in	Solomon Islands	Honiara	Amina had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.	Amina had not studied in Solomon Islands.	Amina had studied in Honiara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amina had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Amina had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amina had studied in Honiara.
RULEBREAKER_0010626_rb	ds	cities	Lucía	she	had studied in	Lesotho	Maseru	Lucía had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.	Lucía had not studied in Lesotho.	Lucía had studied in Maseru.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lucía had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Lucía had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lucía had studied in Maseru.
RULEBREAKER_0010627_rb	ds	cities	Hjørdis	she	had studied in	The Bahamas	Nassau	Hjørdis had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.	Hjørdis had not studied in The Bahamas.	Hjørdis had studied in Nassau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hjørdis had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Hjørdis had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hjørdis had studied in Nassau.
RULEBREAKER_0010628_rb	ds	cities	Daisy	she	had studied in	Tunisia	Tunis	Daisy had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.	Daisy had not studied in Tunisia.	Daisy had studied in Tunis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Daisy had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Daisy had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Daisy had studied in Tunis.
RULEBREAKER_0010629_rb	ds	cities	Anzu	she	had studied in	Nepal	Kathmandu	Anzu had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.	Anzu had not studied in Nepal.	Anzu had studied in Kathmandu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Anzu had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Anzu had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Anzu had studied in Kathmandu.
RULEBREAKER_0010630_rb	ds	cities	Dion	he	had studied in	Qatar	Doha	Dion had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.	Dion had not studied in Qatar.	Dion had studied in Doha.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dion had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Dion had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dion had studied in Doha.
RULEBREAKER_0010631_rb	ds	cities	Aron	he	had studied in	Kazakhstan	Astana	Aron had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.	Aron had not studied in Kazakhstan.	Aron had studied in Astana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aron had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Aron had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aron had studied in Astana.
RULEBREAKER_0010632_rb	ds	cities	Samir	he	had studied in	East Timor	Dili	Samir had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.	Samir had not studied in East Timor.	Samir had studied in Dili.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Samir had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Samir had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Samir had studied in Dili.
RULEBREAKER_0010633_rb	ds	cities	Roghayyeh	she	had studied in	Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	Roghayyeh had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.	Roghayyeh had not studied in Malaysia.	Roghayyeh had studied in Kuala Lumpur.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Roghayyeh had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Roghayyeh had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Roghayyeh had studied in Kuala Lumpur.
RULEBREAKER_0010634_rb	ds	cities	Aïcha	she	had studied in	Tonga	Nukuʻalofa	Aïcha had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.	Aïcha had not studied in Tonga.	Aïcha had studied in Nukuʻalofa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aïcha had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Aïcha had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aïcha had studied in Nukuʻalofa.
RULEBREAKER_0010635_rb	ds	cities	Isidora	she	had studied in	Algeria	Algiers	Isidora had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.	Isidora had not studied in Algeria.	Isidora had studied in Algiers.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Isidora had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Isidora had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Isidora had studied in Algiers.
RULEBREAKER_0010636_rb	ds	cities	Aditi	she	had studied in	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	Kingstown	Aditi had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Aditi had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Aditi had studied in Kingstown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aditi had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Aditi had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aditi had studied in Kingstown.
RULEBREAKER_0010637_rb	ds	cities	Somboon	he	had studied in	Egypt	Cairo	Somboon had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.	Somboon had not studied in Egypt.	Somboon had studied in Cairo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Somboon had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Somboon had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Somboon had studied in Cairo.
RULEBREAKER_0010638_rb	ds	cities	Fadi	he	had studied in	Trinidad and Tobago	Port of Spain	Fadi had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.	Fadi had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.	Fadi had studied in Port of Spain.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Fadi had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Fadi had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fadi had studied in Port of Spain.
RULEBREAKER_0010639_rb	ds	cities	Roan	he	had studied in	Liechtenstein	Vaduz	Roan had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.	Roan had not studied in Liechtenstein.	Roan had studied in Vaduz.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Roan had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Roan had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Roan had studied in Vaduz.
RULEBREAKER_0010640_rb	ds	cities	Teva	he	had studied in	Morocco	Rabat	Teva had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.	Teva had not studied in Morocco.	Teva had studied in Rabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Teva had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Teva had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Teva had studied in Rabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010641_rb	ds	cities	Krishna	he	had studied in	Suriname	Paramaribo	Krishna had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.	Krishna had not studied in Suriname.	Krishna had studied in Paramaribo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Krishna had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Krishna had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Krishna had studied in Paramaribo.
RULEBREAKER_0010642_rb	ds	cities	Zion	he	had studied in	Equatorial Guinea	Malabo	Zion had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.	Zion had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.	Zion had studied in Malabo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zion had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Zion had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zion had studied in Malabo.
RULEBREAKER_0010643_rb	ds	cities	Paninnguaq	she	had studied in	Cape Verde	Praia	Paninnguaq had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.	Paninnguaq had not studied in Cape Verde.	Paninnguaq had studied in Praia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Paninnguaq had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Paninnguaq had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Paninnguaq had studied in Praia.
RULEBREAKER_0010644_rb	ds	cities	Sebastián	he	had studied in	Uzbekistan	Tashkent	Sebastián had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.	Sebastián had not studied in Uzbekistan.	Sebastián had studied in Tashkent.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sebastián had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Sebastián had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sebastián had studied in Tashkent.
RULEBREAKER_0010645_rb	ds	cities	Raya	she	had studied in	United Arab Emirates	Abu Dhabi	Raya had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.	Raya had not studied in United Arab Emirates.	Raya had studied in Abu Dhabi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Raya had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Raya had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Raya had studied in Abu Dhabi.
RULEBREAKER_0010646_rb	ds	cities	Karen	he	had studied in	Niger	Niamey	Karen had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.	Karen had not studied in Niger.	Karen had studied in Niamey.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Karen had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Karen had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Karen had studied in Niamey.
RULEBREAKER_0010647_rb	ds	cities	Trinidad	she	had studied in	Turkey	Ankara	Trinidad had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.	Trinidad had not studied in Turkey.	Trinidad had studied in Ankara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Trinidad had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Trinidad had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Trinidad had studied in Ankara.
RULEBREAKER_0010648_rb	ds	cities	Oisín	he	had studied in	Iran	Tehran	Oisín had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.	Oisín had not studied in Iran.	Oisín had studied in Tehran.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oisín had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Oisín had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oisín had studied in Tehran.
RULEBREAKER_0010649_rb	ds	cities	Kora	she	had studied in	Papua New Guinea	Port Moresby	Kora had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.	Kora had not studied in Papua New Guinea.	Kora had studied in Port Moresby.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kora had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Kora had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kora had studied in Port Moresby.
RULEBREAKER_0010650_rb	ds	cities	Samyar	he	had studied in	Paraguay	Asunción	Samyar had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.	Samyar had not studied in Paraguay.	Samyar had studied in Asunción.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Samyar had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Samyar had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Samyar had studied in Asunción.
RULEBREAKER_0010651_rb	ds	cities	Luis	he	had studied in	The Gambia	Banjul	Luis had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.	Luis had not studied in The Gambia.	Luis had studied in Banjul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Luis had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Luis had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Luis had studied in Banjul.
RULEBREAKER_0010652_rb	ds	cities	Alysha	she	had studied in	Kyrgyzstan	Bishkek	Alysha had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.	Alysha had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.	Alysha had studied in Bishkek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alysha had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Alysha had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alysha had studied in Bishkek.
RULEBREAKER_0010653_rb	ds	cities	Dragana	she	had studied in	Lebanon	Beirut	Dragana had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.	Dragana had not studied in Lebanon.	Dragana had studied in Beirut.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dragana had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Dragana had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dragana had studied in Beirut.
RULEBREAKER_0010654_rb	ds	cities	Abdulaziz	he	had studied in	India	New Delhi	Abdulaziz had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.	Abdulaziz had not studied in India.	Abdulaziz had studied in New Delhi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdulaziz had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Abdulaziz had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdulaziz had studied in New Delhi.
RULEBREAKER_0010655_rb	ds	cities	Andreea	she	had studied in	Marshall Islands	Majuro	Andreea had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.	Andreea had not studied in Marshall Islands.	Andreea had studied in Majuro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Andreea had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Andreea had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Andreea had studied in Majuro.
RULEBREAKER_0010656_rb	ds	cities	Bakary	he	had studied in	Honduras	Tegucigalpa	Bakary had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.	Bakary had not studied in Honduras.	Bakary had studied in Tegucigalpa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bakary had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Bakary had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bakary had studied in Tegucigalpa.
RULEBREAKER_0010657_rb	ds	cities	Lyn	she	had studied in	Germany	Berlin	Lyn had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.	Lyn had not studied in Germany.	Lyn had studied in Berlin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lyn had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Lyn had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lyn had studied in Berlin.
RULEBREAKER_0010658_rb	ds	cities	Lamija	she	had studied in	Croatia	Zagreb	Lamija had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.	Lamija had not studied in Croatia.	Lamija had studied in Zagreb.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lamija had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Lamija had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lamija had studied in Zagreb.
RULEBREAKER_0010659_rb	ds	cities	Matteo	he	had studied in	Saint Lucia	Castries	Matteo had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.	Matteo had not studied in Saint Lucia.	Matteo had studied in Castries.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Matteo had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Matteo had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Matteo had studied in Castries.
RULEBREAKER_0010660_rb	ds	cities	Emil	he	had studied in	Afghanistan	Kabul	Emil had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.	Emil had not studied in Afghanistan.	Emil had studied in Kabul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emil had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Emil had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emil had studied in Kabul.
RULEBREAKER_0010661_rb	ds	cities	Roxana	she	had studied in	Burundi	Gitega	Roxana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.	Roxana had not studied in Burundi.	Roxana had studied in Gitega.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Roxana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Roxana had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Roxana had studied in Gitega.
RULEBREAKER_0010662_rb	ds	cities	Lana	she	had studied in	Palau	Ngerulmud	Lana had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.	Lana had not studied in Palau.	Lana had studied in Ngerulmud.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lana had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Lana had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lana had studied in Ngerulmud.
RULEBREAKER_0010663_rb	ds	cities	Lethabo	she	had studied in	Republic of the Congo	Brazzaville	Lethabo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.	Lethabo had not studied in Republic of the Congo.	Lethabo had studied in Brazzaville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lethabo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Lethabo had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lethabo had studied in Brazzaville.
RULEBREAKER_0010664_rb	ds	cities	Lidia	she	had studied in	Belarus	Minsk	Lidia had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.	Lidia had not studied in Belarus.	Lidia had studied in Minsk.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lidia had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Lidia had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lidia had studied in Minsk.
RULEBREAKER_0010665_rb	ds	cities	Ángel	he	had studied in	Latvia	Riga	Ángel had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.	Ángel had not studied in Latvia.	Ángel had studied in Riga.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ángel had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Ángel had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ángel had studied in Riga.
RULEBREAKER_0010666_rb	ds	cities	Nutsa	she	had studied in	South Korea	Seoul	Nutsa had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.	Nutsa had not studied in South Korea.	Nutsa had studied in Seoul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nutsa had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Nutsa had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nutsa had studied in Seoul.
RULEBREAKER_0010667_rb	ds	cities	Fiadh	she	had studied in	Greece	Athens	Fiadh had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.	Fiadh had not studied in Greece.	Fiadh had studied in Athens.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Fiadh had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Fiadh had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fiadh had studied in Athens.
RULEBREAKER_0010668_rb	ds	cities	Somchai	he	had studied in	Uruguay	Montevideo	Somchai had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.	Somchai had not studied in Uruguay.	Somchai had studied in Montevideo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Somchai had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Somchai had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Somchai had studied in Montevideo.
RULEBREAKER_0010669_rb	ds	cities	Raul	he	had studied in	Russia	Moscow	Raul had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.	Raul had not studied in Russia.	Raul had studied in Moscow.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Raul had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Raul had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Raul had studied in Moscow.
RULEBREAKER_0010670_rb	ds	cities	Lara	she	had studied in	Eritrea	Asmara	Lara had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.	Lara had not studied in Eritrea.	Lara had studied in Asmara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lara had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Lara had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lara had studied in Asmara.
RULEBREAKER_0010671_rb	ds	cities	Isabelle	she	had studied in	Maldives	Malé	Isabelle had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.	Isabelle had not studied in Maldives.	Isabelle had studied in Malé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Isabelle had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Isabelle had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Isabelle had studied in Malé.
RULEBREAKER_0010672_rb	ds	cities	Asemahle	she	had studied in	Ivory Coast	Yamoussoukro	Asemahle had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.	Asemahle had not studied in Ivory Coast.	Asemahle had studied in Yamoussoukro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Asemahle had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Asemahle had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Asemahle had studied in Yamoussoukro.
RULEBREAKER_0010673_rb	ds	cities	Javier	he	had studied in	Estonia	Tallinn	Javier had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.	Javier had not studied in Estonia.	Javier had studied in Tallinn.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Javier had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Javier had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Javier had studied in Tallinn.
RULEBREAKER_0010674_rb	ds	cities	Aline	she	had studied in	Switzerland	Bern	Aline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.	Aline had not studied in Switzerland.	Aline had studied in Bern.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Aline had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aline had studied in Bern.
RULEBREAKER_0010675_rb	ds	cities	Aleks	he	had studied in	Kingdom of Denmark	Copenhagen	Aleks had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.	Aleks had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.	Aleks had studied in Copenhagen.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aleks had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Aleks had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aleks had studied in Copenhagen.
RULEBREAKER_0010676_rb	ds	cities	Marco Antonio	he	had studied in	Romania	Bucharest	Marco Antonio had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.	Marco Antonio had not studied in Romania.	Marco Antonio had studied in Bucharest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marco Antonio had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Marco Antonio had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marco Antonio had studied in Bucharest.
RULEBREAKER_0010677_rb	ds	cities	Kiaan	he	had studied in	Azerbaijan	Baku	Kiaan had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.	Kiaan had not studied in Azerbaijan.	Kiaan had studied in Baku.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiaan had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Kiaan had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kiaan had studied in Baku.
RULEBREAKER_0010678_rb	ds	cities	Livia	she	had studied in	Bulgaria	Sofia	Livia had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.	Livia had not studied in Bulgaria.	Livia had studied in Sofia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Livia had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Livia had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Livia had studied in Sofia.
RULEBREAKER_0010679_rb	ds	cities	Danna	she	had studied in	Norway	Oslo	Danna had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.	Danna had not studied in Norway.	Danna had studied in Oslo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Danna had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Danna had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Danna had studied in Oslo.
RULEBREAKER_0010680_rb	ds	cities	Shu-chuan	she	had studied in	Bhutan	Thimphu	Shu-chuan had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.	Shu-chuan had not studied in Bhutan.	Shu-chuan had studied in Thimphu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shu-chuan had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Shu-chuan had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shu-chuan had studied in Thimphu.
RULEBREAKER_0010681_rb	ds	cities	Lisakhanya	she	had studied in	Saint Kitts and Nevis	Basseterre	Lisakhanya had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Lisakhanya had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Lisakhanya had studied in Basseterre.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lisakhanya had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Lisakhanya had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lisakhanya had studied in Basseterre.
RULEBREAKER_0010682_rb	ds	cities	Bisera	she	had studied in	Philippines	Manila	Bisera had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.	Bisera had not studied in Philippines.	Bisera had studied in Manila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bisera had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Bisera had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bisera had studied in Manila.
RULEBREAKER_0010683_rb	ds	cities	Yekaterina	she	had studied in	Ireland	Dublin	Yekaterina had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.	Yekaterina had not studied in Ireland.	Yekaterina had studied in Dublin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yekaterina had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Yekaterina had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yekaterina had studied in Dublin.
RULEBREAKER_0010684_rb	ds	cities	Hanna	she	had studied in	Dominican Republic	Santo Domingo	Hanna had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.	Hanna had not studied in Dominican Republic.	Hanna had studied in Santo Domingo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hanna had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Hanna had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hanna had studied in Santo Domingo.
RULEBREAKER_0010685_rb	ds	cities	Antônia	she	had studied in	Australia	Canberra	Antônia had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.	Antônia had not studied in Australia.	Antônia had studied in Canberra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Antônia had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Antônia had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Antônia had studied in Canberra.
RULEBREAKER_0010686_rb	ds	cities	Mary	she	had studied in	Federated States of Micronesia	Palikir	Mary had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.	Mary had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.	Mary had studied in Palikir.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mary had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Mary had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mary had studied in Palikir.
RULEBREAKER_0010687_rb	ds	cities	Martin	he	had studied in	Japan	Tokyo	Martin had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.	Martin had not studied in Japan.	Martin had studied in Tokyo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Martin had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Martin had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Martin had studied in Tokyo.
RULEBREAKER_0010688_rb	ds	cities	Daniela	she	had studied in	Myanmar	Naypyidaw	Daniela had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.	Daniela had not studied in Myanmar.	Daniela had studied in Naypyidaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Daniela had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Daniela had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Daniela had studied in Naypyidaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010689_rb	ds	cities	Mark	he	had studied in	Portugal	Lisbon	Mark had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.	Mark had not studied in Portugal.	Mark had studied in Lisbon.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mark had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Mark had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mark had studied in Lisbon.
RULEBREAKER_0010690_rb	ds	cities	Eymen	he	had studied in	Ukraine	Kyiv	Eymen had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.	Eymen had not studied in Ukraine.	Eymen had studied in Kyiv.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eymen had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Eymen had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eymen had studied in Kyiv.
RULEBREAKER_0010691_rb	ds	cities	Asilim	she	had studied in	Rwanda	Kigali	Asilim had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.	Asilim had not studied in Rwanda.	Asilim had studied in Kigali.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Asilim had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Asilim had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Asilim had studied in Kigali.
RULEBREAKER_0010692_rb	ds	cities	Lily	she	had studied in	Grenada	St. George's	Lily had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.	Lily had not studied in Grenada.	Lily had studied in St. George's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lily had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Lily had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lily had studied in St. George's.
RULEBREAKER_0010693_rb	ds	cities	Paneeraq	she	had studied in	Cameroon	Yaoundé	Paneeraq had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.	Paneeraq had not studied in Cameroon.	Paneeraq had studied in Yaoundé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Paneeraq had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Paneeraq had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Paneeraq had studied in Yaoundé.
RULEBREAKER_0010694_rb	ds	cities	Veronika	she	had studied in	Zambia	Lusaka	Veronika had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.	Veronika had not studied in Zambia.	Veronika had studied in Lusaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Veronika had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Veronika had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Veronika had studied in Lusaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010695_rb	ds	cities	Nathan	he	had studied in	Tuvalu	Funafuti	Nathan had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.	Nathan had not studied in Tuvalu.	Nathan had studied in Funafuti.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathan had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Nathan had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nathan had studied in Funafuti.
RULEBREAKER_0010696_rb	ds	cities	Ivana	she	had studied in	Sudan	Khartoum	Ivana had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.	Ivana had not studied in Sudan.	Ivana had studied in Khartoum.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivana had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Ivana had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ivana had studied in Khartoum.
RULEBREAKER_0010697_rb	ds	cities	Lenna	she	had studied in	South Sudan	Juba	Lenna had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.	Lenna had not studied in South Sudan.	Lenna had studied in Juba.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lenna had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Lenna had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lenna had studied in Juba.
RULEBREAKER_0010698_rb	ds	cities	Sakeena	she	had studied in	Ethiopia	Addis Ababa	Sakeena had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.	Sakeena had not studied in Ethiopia.	Sakeena had studied in Addis Ababa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sakeena had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Sakeena had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sakeena had studied in Addis Ababa.
RULEBREAKER_0010699_rb	ds	cities	Zala	she	had studied in	Iceland	Reykjavík	Zala had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.	Zala had not studied in Iceland.	Zala had studied in Reykjavík.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zala had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Zala had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zala had studied in Reykjavík.
RULEBREAKER_0010700_rb	ds	cities	Nurul	she	had studied in	Moldova	Chișinău	Nurul had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.	Nurul had not studied in Moldova.	Nurul had studied in Chișinău.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nurul had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Nurul had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nurul had studied in Chișinău.
RULEBREAKER_0010701_rb	ds	cities	Khongordzol	she	had studied in	São Tomé and Príncipe	São Tomé	Khongordzol had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Khongordzol had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Khongordzol had studied in São Tomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Khongordzol had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Khongordzol had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Khongordzol had studied in São Tomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010702_rb	ds	cities	Santiago	he	had studied in	Cyprus	Nicosia	Santiago had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.	Santiago had not studied in Cyprus.	Santiago had studied in Nicosia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Santiago had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Santiago had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Santiago had studied in Nicosia.
RULEBREAKER_0010703_rb	ds	cities	Annie	she	had studied in	Guyana	Georgetown	Annie had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.	Annie had not studied in Guyana.	Annie had studied in Georgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Annie had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Annie had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Annie had studied in Georgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010704_rb	ds	cities	Maria	she	had studied in	Jordan	Amman	Maria had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.	Maria had not studied in Jordan.	Maria had studied in Amman.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maria had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Maria had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maria had studied in Amman.
RULEBREAKER_0010705_rb	ds	cities	Safiya	she	had studied in	Andorra	Andorra la Vella	Safiya had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.	Safiya had not studied in Andorra.	Safiya had studied in Andorra la Vella.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Safiya had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Safiya had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Safiya had studied in Andorra la Vella.
RULEBREAKER_0010706_rb	ds	cities	Puteri	she	had studied in	Serbia	Belgrade	Puteri had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.	Puteri had not studied in Serbia.	Puteri had studied in Belgrade.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Puteri had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Puteri had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Puteri had studied in Belgrade.
RULEBREAKER_0010707_rb	ds	cities	Leon	he	had studied in	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Sarajevo	Leon had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Leon had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Leon had studied in Sarajevo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leon had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Leon had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leon had studied in Sarajevo.
RULEBREAKER_0010708_rb	ds	cities	Herkus	he	had studied in	Kingdom of the Netherlands	Amsterdam	Herkus had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Herkus had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Herkus had studied in Amsterdam.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Herkus had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Herkus had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Herkus had studied in Amsterdam.
RULEBREAKER_0010709_rb	ds	cities	Hassan	he	had studied in	Sierra Leone	Freetown	Hassan had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.	Hassan had not studied in Sierra Leone.	Hassan had studied in Freetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hassan had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Hassan had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hassan had studied in Freetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010610_rb

ds

cities

Jack

he

had studied in

Antigua and Barbuda

Saint John's

Jack had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.

Jack had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.

Jack had studied in Saint John's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jack had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Jack had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jack had studied in Saint John's.

RULEBREAKER_0010611_rb

ds

cities

Isaac

he

had studied in

Madagascar

Antananarivo

Isaac had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.

Isaac had not studied in Madagascar.

Isaac had studied in Antananarivo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Isaac had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Isaac had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Isaac had studied in Antananarivo.

RULEBREAKER_0010612_rb

ds

cities

Lucija

she

had studied in

Chile

Santiago

Lucija had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.

Lucija had not studied in Chile.

Lucija had studied in Santiago.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lucija had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Lucija had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lucija had studied in Santiago.

RULEBREAKER_0010613_rb

ds

cities

Naya

she

had studied in

Finland

Helsinki

Naya had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.

Naya had not studied in Finland.

Naya had studied in Helsinki.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Naya had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Naya had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Naya had studied in Helsinki.

RULEBREAKER_0010614_rb

ds

cities

Hannah

she

had studied in

Saudi Arabia

Riyadh

Hannah had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.

Hannah had not studied in Saudi Arabia.

Hannah had studied in Riyadh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hannah had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Hannah had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hannah had studied in Riyadh.

RULEBREAKER_0010615_rb

ds

cities

Jokūbas

he

had studied in

Central African Republic

Bangui

Jokūbas had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.

Jokūbas had not studied in Central African Republic.

Jokūbas had studied in Bangui.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jokūbas had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Jokūbas had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jokūbas had studied in Bangui.

RULEBREAKER_0010616_rb

ds

cities

Ioane

he

had studied in

Ecuador

Quito

Ioane had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.

Ioane had not studied in Ecuador.

Ioane had studied in Quito.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ioane had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Ioane had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ioane had studied in Quito.

RULEBREAKER_0010617_rb

ds

cities

Chih-chiang

he

had studied in

Tanzania

Dodoma

Chih-chiang had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.

Chih-chiang had not studied in Tanzania.

Chih-chiang had studied in Dodoma.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-chiang had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-chiang had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chih-chiang had studied in Dodoma.

RULEBREAKER_0010618_rb

ds

cities

Franciszek

he

had studied in

Somalia

Mogadishu

Franciszek had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.

Franciszek had not studied in Somalia.

Franciszek had studied in Mogadishu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Franciszek had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Franciszek had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Franciszek had studied in Mogadishu.

RULEBREAKER_0010619_rb

ds

cities

Lwandle

he

had studied in

Malawi

Lilongwe

Lwandle had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.

Lwandle had not studied in Malawi.

Lwandle had studied in Lilongwe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lwandle had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Lwandle had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lwandle had studied in Lilongwe.

RULEBREAKER_0010620_rb

ds

cities

Turki

he

had studied in

Botswana

Gaborone

Turki had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.

Turki had not studied in Botswana.

Turki had studied in Gaborone.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Turki had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Turki had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Turki had studied in Gaborone.

RULEBREAKER_0010621_rb

ds

cities

Saar

she

had studied in

Belize

Belmopan

Saar had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.

Saar had not studied in Belize.

Saar had studied in Belmopan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Saar had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Saar had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Saar had studied in Belmopan.

RULEBREAKER_0010622_rb

ds

cities

Somsak

he

had studied in

Senegal

Dakar

Somsak had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.

Somsak had not studied in Senegal.

Somsak had studied in Dakar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Somsak had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Somsak had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Somsak had studied in Dakar.

RULEBREAKER_0010623_rb

ds

cities

Albert

he

had studied in

Samoa

Apia

Albert had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.

Albert had not studied in Samoa.

Albert had studied in Apia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Albert had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Albert had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Albert had studied in Apia.

RULEBREAKER_0010624_rb

ds

cities

Gabija

she

had studied in

Kiribati

South Tarawa

Gabija had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.

Gabija had not studied in Kiribati.

Gabija had studied in South Tarawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gabija had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Gabija had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gabija had studied in South Tarawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010625_rb

ds

cities

Amina

she

had studied in

Solomon Islands

Honiara

Amina had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.

Amina had not studied in Solomon Islands.

Amina had studied in Honiara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amina had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Amina had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amina had studied in Honiara.

RULEBREAKER_0010626_rb

ds

cities

Lucía

she

had studied in

Lesotho

Maseru

Lucía had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.

Lucía had not studied in Lesotho.

Lucía had studied in Maseru.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lucía had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Lucía had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lucía had studied in Maseru.

RULEBREAKER_0010627_rb

ds

cities

Hjørdis

she

had studied in

The Bahamas

Nassau

Hjørdis had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.

Hjørdis had not studied in The Bahamas.

Hjørdis had studied in Nassau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hjørdis had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Hjørdis had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hjørdis had studied in Nassau.

RULEBREAKER_0010628_rb

ds

cities

Daisy

she

had studied in

Tunisia

Tunis

Daisy had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.

Daisy had not studied in Tunisia.

Daisy had studied in Tunis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Daisy had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Daisy had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Daisy had studied in Tunis.

RULEBREAKER_0010629_rb

ds

cities

Anzu

she

had studied in

Nepal

Kathmandu

Anzu had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.

Anzu had not studied in Nepal.

Anzu had studied in Kathmandu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Anzu had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Anzu had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Anzu had studied in Kathmandu.

RULEBREAKER_0010630_rb

ds

cities

Dion

he

had studied in

Qatar

Doha

Dion had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.

Dion had not studied in Qatar.

Dion had studied in Doha.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dion had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Dion had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dion had studied in Doha.

RULEBREAKER_0010631_rb

ds

cities

Aron

he

had studied in

Kazakhstan

Astana

Aron had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.

Aron had not studied in Kazakhstan.

Aron had studied in Astana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aron had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Aron had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aron had studied in Astana.

RULEBREAKER_0010632_rb

ds

cities

Samir

he

had studied in

East Timor

Dili

Samir had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.

Samir had not studied in East Timor.

Samir had studied in Dili.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Samir had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Samir had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Samir had studied in Dili.

RULEBREAKER_0010633_rb

ds

cities

Roghayyeh

she

had studied in

Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur

Roghayyeh had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.

Roghayyeh had not studied in Malaysia.

Roghayyeh had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Roghayyeh had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Roghayyeh had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Roghayyeh had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

RULEBREAKER_0010634_rb

ds

cities

Aïcha

she

had studied in

Tonga

Nukuʻalofa

Aïcha had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.

Aïcha had not studied in Tonga.

Aïcha had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aïcha had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Aïcha had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aïcha had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

RULEBREAKER_0010635_rb

ds

cities

Isidora

she

had studied in

Algeria

Algiers

Isidora had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.

Isidora had not studied in Algeria.

Isidora had studied in Algiers.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Isidora had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Isidora had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Isidora had studied in Algiers.

RULEBREAKER_0010636_rb

ds

cities

Aditi

she

had studied in

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Kingstown

Aditi had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Aditi had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Aditi had studied in Kingstown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aditi had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Aditi had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aditi had studied in Kingstown.

RULEBREAKER_0010637_rb

ds

cities

Somboon

he

had studied in

Egypt

Cairo

Somboon had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.

Somboon had not studied in Egypt.

Somboon had studied in Cairo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Somboon had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Somboon had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Somboon had studied in Cairo.

RULEBREAKER_0010638_rb

ds

cities

Fadi

he

had studied in

Trinidad and Tobago

Port of Spain

Fadi had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.

Fadi had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.

Fadi had studied in Port of Spain.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Fadi had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Fadi had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fadi had studied in Port of Spain.

RULEBREAKER_0010639_rb

ds

cities

Roan

he

had studied in

Liechtenstein

Vaduz

Roan had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.

Roan had not studied in Liechtenstein.

Roan had studied in Vaduz.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Roan had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Roan had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Roan had studied in Vaduz.

RULEBREAKER_0010640_rb

ds

cities

Teva

he

had studied in

Morocco

Rabat

Teva had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.

Teva had not studied in Morocco.

Teva had studied in Rabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Teva had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Teva had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Teva had studied in Rabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010641_rb

ds

cities

Krishna

he

had studied in

Suriname

Paramaribo

Krishna had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.

Krishna had not studied in Suriname.

Krishna had studied in Paramaribo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Krishna had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Krishna had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Krishna had studied in Paramaribo.

RULEBREAKER_0010642_rb

ds

cities

Zion

he

had studied in

Equatorial Guinea

Malabo

Zion had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.

Zion had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.

Zion had studied in Malabo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zion had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Zion had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zion had studied in Malabo.

RULEBREAKER_0010643_rb

ds

cities

Paninnguaq

she

had studied in

Cape Verde

Praia

Paninnguaq had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.

Paninnguaq had not studied in Cape Verde.

Paninnguaq had studied in Praia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Paninnguaq had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Paninnguaq had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Paninnguaq had studied in Praia.

RULEBREAKER_0010644_rb

ds

cities

Sebastián

he

had studied in

Uzbekistan

Tashkent

Sebastián had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.

Sebastián had not studied in Uzbekistan.

Sebastián had studied in Tashkent.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sebastián had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Sebastián had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sebastián had studied in Tashkent.

RULEBREAKER_0010645_rb

ds

cities

Raya

she

had studied in

United Arab Emirates

Abu Dhabi

Raya had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.

Raya had not studied in United Arab Emirates.

Raya had studied in Abu Dhabi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Raya had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Raya had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Raya had studied in Abu Dhabi.

RULEBREAKER_0010646_rb

ds

cities

Karen

he

had studied in

Niger

Niamey

Karen had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.

Karen had not studied in Niger.

Karen had studied in Niamey.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Karen had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Karen had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Karen had studied in Niamey.

RULEBREAKER_0010647_rb

ds

cities

Trinidad

she

had studied in

Turkey

Ankara

Trinidad had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.

Trinidad had not studied in Turkey.

Trinidad had studied in Ankara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Trinidad had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Trinidad had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Trinidad had studied in Ankara.

RULEBREAKER_0010648_rb

ds

cities

Oisín

he

had studied in

Iran

Tehran

Oisín had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.

Oisín had not studied in Iran.

Oisín had studied in Tehran.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oisín had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Oisín had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oisín had studied in Tehran.

RULEBREAKER_0010649_rb

ds

cities

Kora

she

had studied in

Papua New Guinea

Port Moresby

Kora had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.

Kora had not studied in Papua New Guinea.

Kora had studied in Port Moresby.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kora had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Kora had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kora had studied in Port Moresby.

RULEBREAKER_0010650_rb

ds

cities

Samyar

he

had studied in

Paraguay

Asunción

Samyar had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.

Samyar had not studied in Paraguay.

Samyar had studied in Asunción.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Samyar had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Samyar had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Samyar had studied in Asunción.

RULEBREAKER_0010651_rb

ds

cities

Luis

he

had studied in

The Gambia

Banjul

Luis had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.

Luis had not studied in The Gambia.

Luis had studied in Banjul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Luis had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Luis had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Luis had studied in Banjul.

RULEBREAKER_0010652_rb

ds

cities

Alysha

she

had studied in

Kyrgyzstan

Bishkek

Alysha had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.

Alysha had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.

Alysha had studied in Bishkek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alysha had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Alysha had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alysha had studied in Bishkek.

RULEBREAKER_0010653_rb

ds

cities

Dragana

she

had studied in

Lebanon

Beirut

Dragana had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.

Dragana had not studied in Lebanon.

Dragana had studied in Beirut.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dragana had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Dragana had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dragana had studied in Beirut.

RULEBREAKER_0010654_rb

ds

cities

Abdulaziz

he

had studied in

India

New Delhi

Abdulaziz had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.

Abdulaziz had not studied in India.

Abdulaziz had studied in New Delhi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdulaziz had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Abdulaziz had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdulaziz had studied in New Delhi.

RULEBREAKER_0010655_rb

ds

cities

Andreea

she

had studied in

Marshall Islands

Majuro

Andreea had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.

Andreea had not studied in Marshall Islands.

Andreea had studied in Majuro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Andreea had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Andreea had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Andreea had studied in Majuro.

RULEBREAKER_0010656_rb

ds

cities

Bakary

he

had studied in

Honduras

Tegucigalpa

Bakary had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.

Bakary had not studied in Honduras.

Bakary had studied in Tegucigalpa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bakary had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Bakary had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bakary had studied in Tegucigalpa.

RULEBREAKER_0010657_rb

ds

cities

Lyn

she

had studied in

Germany

Berlin

Lyn had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.

Lyn had not studied in Germany.

Lyn had studied in Berlin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lyn had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Lyn had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lyn had studied in Berlin.

RULEBREAKER_0010658_rb

ds

cities

Lamija

she

had studied in

Croatia

Zagreb

Lamija had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.

Lamija had not studied in Croatia.

Lamija had studied in Zagreb.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lamija had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Lamija had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lamija had studied in Zagreb.

RULEBREAKER_0010659_rb

ds

cities

Matteo

he

had studied in

Saint Lucia

Castries

Matteo had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.

Matteo had not studied in Saint Lucia.

Matteo had studied in Castries.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Matteo had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Matteo had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Matteo had studied in Castries.

RULEBREAKER_0010660_rb

ds

cities

Emil

he

had studied in

Afghanistan

Kabul

Emil had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.

Emil had not studied in Afghanistan.

Emil had studied in Kabul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emil had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Emil had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emil had studied in Kabul.

RULEBREAKER_0010661_rb

ds

cities

Roxana

she

had studied in

Burundi

Gitega

Roxana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.

Roxana had not studied in Burundi.

Roxana had studied in Gitega.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Roxana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Roxana had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Roxana had studied in Gitega.

RULEBREAKER_0010662_rb

ds

cities

Lana

she

had studied in

Palau

Ngerulmud

Lana had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.

Lana had not studied in Palau.

Lana had studied in Ngerulmud.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lana had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Lana had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lana had studied in Ngerulmud.

RULEBREAKER_0010663_rb

ds

cities

Lethabo

she

had studied in

Republic of the Congo

Brazzaville

Lethabo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.

Lethabo had not studied in Republic of the Congo.

Lethabo had studied in Brazzaville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lethabo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Lethabo had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lethabo had studied in Brazzaville.

RULEBREAKER_0010664_rb

ds

cities

Lidia

she

had studied in

Belarus

Minsk

Lidia had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.

Lidia had not studied in Belarus.

Lidia had studied in Minsk.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lidia had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Lidia had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lidia had studied in Minsk.

RULEBREAKER_0010665_rb

ds

cities

Ángel

he

had studied in

Latvia

Riga

Ángel had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.

Ángel had not studied in Latvia.

Ángel had studied in Riga.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ángel had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Ángel had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ángel had studied in Riga.

RULEBREAKER_0010666_rb

ds

cities

Nutsa

she

had studied in

South Korea

Seoul

Nutsa had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.

Nutsa had not studied in South Korea.

Nutsa had studied in Seoul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nutsa had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Nutsa had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nutsa had studied in Seoul.

RULEBREAKER_0010667_rb

ds

cities

Fiadh

she

had studied in

Greece

Athens

Fiadh had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.

Fiadh had not studied in Greece.

Fiadh had studied in Athens.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Fiadh had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Fiadh had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fiadh had studied in Athens.

RULEBREAKER_0010668_rb

ds

cities

Somchai

he

had studied in

Uruguay

Montevideo

Somchai had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.

Somchai had not studied in Uruguay.

Somchai had studied in Montevideo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Somchai had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Somchai had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Somchai had studied in Montevideo.

RULEBREAKER_0010669_rb

ds

cities

Raul

he

had studied in

Russia

Moscow

Raul had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.

Raul had not studied in Russia.

Raul had studied in Moscow.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Raul had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Raul had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Raul had studied in Moscow.

RULEBREAKER_0010670_rb

ds

cities

Lara

she

had studied in

Eritrea

Asmara

Lara had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.

Lara had not studied in Eritrea.

Lara had studied in Asmara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lara had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Lara had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lara had studied in Asmara.

RULEBREAKER_0010671_rb

ds

cities

Isabelle

she

had studied in

Maldives

Malé

Isabelle had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.

Isabelle had not studied in Maldives.

Isabelle had studied in Malé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Isabelle had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Isabelle had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Isabelle had studied in Malé.

RULEBREAKER_0010672_rb

ds

cities

Asemahle

she

had studied in

Ivory Coast

Yamoussoukro

Asemahle had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.

Asemahle had not studied in Ivory Coast.

Asemahle had studied in Yamoussoukro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Asemahle had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Asemahle had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Asemahle had studied in Yamoussoukro.

RULEBREAKER_0010673_rb

ds

cities

Javier

he

had studied in

Estonia

Tallinn

Javier had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.

Javier had not studied in Estonia.

Javier had studied in Tallinn.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Javier had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Javier had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Javier had studied in Tallinn.

RULEBREAKER_0010674_rb

ds

cities

Aline

she

had studied in

Switzerland

Bern

Aline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.

Aline had not studied in Switzerland.

Aline had studied in Bern.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Aline had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aline had studied in Bern.

RULEBREAKER_0010675_rb

ds

cities

Aleks

he

had studied in

Kingdom of Denmark

Copenhagen

Aleks had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.

Aleks had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.

Aleks had studied in Copenhagen.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aleks had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Aleks had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aleks had studied in Copenhagen.

RULEBREAKER_0010676_rb

ds

cities

Marco Antonio

he

had studied in

Romania

Bucharest

Marco Antonio had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.

Marco Antonio had not studied in Romania.

Marco Antonio had studied in Bucharest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marco Antonio had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Marco Antonio had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marco Antonio had studied in Bucharest.

RULEBREAKER_0010677_rb

ds

cities

Kiaan

he

had studied in

Azerbaijan

Baku

Kiaan had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.

Kiaan had not studied in Azerbaijan.

Kiaan had studied in Baku.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiaan had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Kiaan had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kiaan had studied in Baku.

RULEBREAKER_0010678_rb

ds

cities

Livia

she

had studied in

Bulgaria

Sofia

Livia had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.

Livia had not studied in Bulgaria.

Livia had studied in Sofia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Livia had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Livia had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Livia had studied in Sofia.

RULEBREAKER_0010679_rb

ds

cities

Danna

she

had studied in

Norway

Oslo

Danna had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.

Danna had not studied in Norway.

Danna had studied in Oslo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Danna had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Danna had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Danna had studied in Oslo.

RULEBREAKER_0010680_rb

ds

cities

Shu-chuan

she

had studied in

Bhutan

Thimphu

Shu-chuan had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.

Shu-chuan had not studied in Bhutan.

Shu-chuan had studied in Thimphu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shu-chuan had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Shu-chuan had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shu-chuan had studied in Thimphu.

RULEBREAKER_0010681_rb

ds

cities

Lisakhanya

she

had studied in

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Basseterre

Lisakhanya had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Lisakhanya had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Lisakhanya had studied in Basseterre.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lisakhanya had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Lisakhanya had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lisakhanya had studied in Basseterre.

RULEBREAKER_0010682_rb

ds

cities

Bisera

she

had studied in

Philippines

Manila

Bisera had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.

Bisera had not studied in Philippines.

Bisera had studied in Manila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bisera had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Bisera had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bisera had studied in Manila.

RULEBREAKER_0010683_rb

ds

cities

Yekaterina

she

had studied in

Ireland

Dublin

Yekaterina had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.

Yekaterina had not studied in Ireland.

Yekaterina had studied in Dublin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yekaterina had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Yekaterina had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yekaterina had studied in Dublin.

RULEBREAKER_0010684_rb

ds

cities

Hanna

she

had studied in

Dominican Republic

Santo Domingo

Hanna had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.

Hanna had not studied in Dominican Republic.

Hanna had studied in Santo Domingo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hanna had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Hanna had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hanna had studied in Santo Domingo.

RULEBREAKER_0010685_rb

ds

cities

Antônia

she

had studied in

Australia

Canberra

Antônia had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.

Antônia had not studied in Australia.

Antônia had studied in Canberra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Antônia had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Antônia had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Antônia had studied in Canberra.

RULEBREAKER_0010686_rb

ds

cities

Mary

she

had studied in

Federated States of Micronesia

Palikir

Mary had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.

Mary had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.

Mary had studied in Palikir.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mary had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Mary had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mary had studied in Palikir.

RULEBREAKER_0010687_rb

ds

cities

Martin

he

had studied in

Japan

Tokyo

Martin had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.

Martin had not studied in Japan.

Martin had studied in Tokyo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Martin had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Martin had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Martin had studied in Tokyo.

RULEBREAKER_0010688_rb

ds

cities

Daniela

she

had studied in

Myanmar

Naypyidaw

Daniela had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.

Daniela had not studied in Myanmar.

Daniela had studied in Naypyidaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Daniela had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Daniela had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Daniela had studied in Naypyidaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010689_rb

ds

cities

Mark

he

had studied in

Portugal

Lisbon

Mark had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.

Mark had not studied in Portugal.

Mark had studied in Lisbon.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mark had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Mark had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mark had studied in Lisbon.

RULEBREAKER_0010690_rb

ds

cities

Eymen

he

had studied in

Ukraine

Kyiv

Eymen had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.

Eymen had not studied in Ukraine.

Eymen had studied in Kyiv.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eymen had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Eymen had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eymen had studied in Kyiv.

RULEBREAKER_0010691_rb

ds

cities

Asilim

she

had studied in

Rwanda

Kigali

Asilim had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.

Asilim had not studied in Rwanda.

Asilim had studied in Kigali.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Asilim had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Asilim had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Asilim had studied in Kigali.

RULEBREAKER_0010692_rb

ds

cities

Lily

she

had studied in

Grenada

St. George's

Lily had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.

Lily had not studied in Grenada.

Lily had studied in St. George's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lily had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Lily had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lily had studied in St. George's.

RULEBREAKER_0010693_rb

ds

cities

Paneeraq

she

had studied in

Cameroon

Yaoundé

Paneeraq had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.

Paneeraq had not studied in Cameroon.

Paneeraq had studied in Yaoundé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Paneeraq had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Paneeraq had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Paneeraq had studied in Yaoundé.

RULEBREAKER_0010694_rb

ds

cities

Veronika

she

had studied in

Zambia

Lusaka

Veronika had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.

Veronika had not studied in Zambia.

Veronika had studied in Lusaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Veronika had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Veronika had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Veronika had studied in Lusaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010695_rb

ds

cities

Nathan

he

had studied in

Tuvalu

Funafuti

Nathan had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.

Nathan had not studied in Tuvalu.

Nathan had studied in Funafuti.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathan had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Nathan had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nathan had studied in Funafuti.

RULEBREAKER_0010696_rb

ds

cities

Ivana

she

had studied in

Sudan

Khartoum

Ivana had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.

Ivana had not studied in Sudan.

Ivana had studied in Khartoum.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivana had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Ivana had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ivana had studied in Khartoum.

RULEBREAKER_0010697_rb

ds

cities

Lenna

she

had studied in

South Sudan

Juba

Lenna had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.

Lenna had not studied in South Sudan.

Lenna had studied in Juba.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lenna had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Lenna had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lenna had studied in Juba.

RULEBREAKER_0010698_rb

ds

cities

Sakeena

she

had studied in

Ethiopia

Addis Ababa

Sakeena had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.

Sakeena had not studied in Ethiopia.

Sakeena had studied in Addis Ababa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sakeena had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Sakeena had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sakeena had studied in Addis Ababa.

RULEBREAKER_0010699_rb

ds

cities

Zala

she

had studied in

Iceland

Reykjavík

Zala had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.

Zala had not studied in Iceland.

Zala had studied in Reykjavík.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zala had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Zala had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zala had studied in Reykjavík.

RULEBREAKER_0010700_rb

ds

cities

Nurul

she

had studied in

Moldova

Chișinău

Nurul had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.

Nurul had not studied in Moldova.

Nurul had studied in Chișinău.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nurul had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Nurul had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nurul had studied in Chișinău.

RULEBREAKER_0010701_rb

ds

cities

Khongordzol

she

had studied in

São Tomé and Príncipe

São Tomé

Khongordzol had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Khongordzol had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Khongordzol had studied in São Tomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Khongordzol had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Khongordzol had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Khongordzol had studied in São Tomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010702_rb

ds

cities

Santiago

he

had studied in

Cyprus

Nicosia

Santiago had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.

Santiago had not studied in Cyprus.

Santiago had studied in Nicosia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Santiago had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Santiago had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Santiago had studied in Nicosia.

RULEBREAKER_0010703_rb

ds

cities

Annie

she

had studied in

Guyana

Georgetown

Annie had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.

Annie had not studied in Guyana.

Annie had studied in Georgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Annie had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Annie had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Annie had studied in Georgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010704_rb

ds

cities

Maria

she

had studied in

Jordan

Amman

Maria had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.

Maria had not studied in Jordan.

Maria had studied in Amman.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maria had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Maria had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maria had studied in Amman.

RULEBREAKER_0010705_rb

ds

cities

Safiya

she

had studied in

Andorra

Andorra la Vella

Safiya had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.

Safiya had not studied in Andorra.

Safiya had studied in Andorra la Vella.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Safiya had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Safiya had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Safiya had studied in Andorra la Vella.

RULEBREAKER_0010706_rb

ds

cities

Puteri

she

had studied in

Serbia

Belgrade

Puteri had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.

Puteri had not studied in Serbia.

Puteri had studied in Belgrade.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Puteri had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Puteri had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Puteri had studied in Belgrade.

RULEBREAKER_0010707_rb

ds

cities

Leon

he

had studied in

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Sarajevo

Leon had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Leon had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Leon had studied in Sarajevo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leon had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Leon had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leon had studied in Sarajevo.

RULEBREAKER_0010708_rb

ds

cities

Herkus

he

had studied in

Kingdom of the Netherlands

Amsterdam

Herkus had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Herkus had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Herkus had studied in Amsterdam.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Herkus had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Herkus had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Herkus had studied in Amsterdam.

RULEBREAKER_0010709_rb

ds

cities

Hassan

he

had studied in

Sierra Leone

Freetown

Hassan had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.

Hassan had not studied in Sierra Leone.

Hassan had studied in Freetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hassan had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Hassan had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hassan had studied in Freetown.